Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1987/04/15 - Agenda Packet
~' CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:30 p.m. • APMI 16, 1917 Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga •~• Ciry Councilmemben Dennis L. Stout, Meyv. Pamela J. Wright, Mapes pp Tem Deborah N. Brown, ca,nrnmeinM, Charles 1. Buquet, co~~„rm.me„ Jeffrey King, cnem~nmrmDe, •r• Lauren M. Wasserman, c;lv M,~as„ James Markman, crn~ Arromn~ Beverly A. Authelet, c;r,.~ c;o} City Once: 989-1851 lions Perk: 980-31e5 ~J PAGE City Council Agenda Apr31 15, 3987 I i All itaau aahrittad for tba Clty Gvrcil Aganda mart 6a io rritiag. 2fit datdliaa for aaDatttiug tLrt star is 5:00 p.r, m iht Ytdnaaday Prior to tM awtiag. 1De Citt Qtrk•a Offict racti~r all rneL itra. A. CALF. TO dgDQ 3. Pladgr of Allegianct to Piag. 2. Roll Call: Hrgra Buqurt . Stout ~_ Ring _ and Nrigbt _. -- D. 1~0lCOfflS/!!~1'ATIDm I. Prutasatioe of Proclautioa to E. David Datktr for hir ountaading atmica u a rrDar of eht [uacbo Cucronga Planning Cooiariow 2. Fzaaantation of a Protlaution daclasiag Mal 1, 1987 u rLr Dq" is eha Ciq of Rancho Cucronga. 3. Prutnution of a Prociration to eha 6tirrada High School Tall Plag Trr. ` f t C. ~ CAL~AE Tha follariag Came CalrrAat ltaay azr e~paeead eo ba toatia aag aaretatze-arial. SLq rill b• aettd apq DT tM Corell at ow tiw rie-re alrewioe, M' itr ry M rarord by a CaamciLrDtr of wMr of W aadiaeet fos diacraaiaa. 1. Approval of Narrantr, Mgiater Nor. 6/1181 and 618/87 t and Payroll Lading 412/87 fot tba total count of $1.340,316.21. 2. Approval of Niaueu - Ptbrwty 19, 1987 (Hugwr ~ i t abrtnt). i i ~ ~ ,. Approval to aatcuq SuDordiwtion Agraraat ritD 17 Lincoln Rancho Cucrooga Asrociatn. A California Psremnhip, louud on eDt oorttnrnt cost[ of Eighth i i Stzast and Aocbntar Avaaua. ~'v'~~. ~': _~, • r 1 L J City Cowcil Agenda April 15, 1987 PAGE RESOLUTION N0. 87-169 24 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITE COONCII. OP THB CITY OF RANWO CDCAMDNOA, CALIFORNLA. APPROVING A SUBORDINATION M,AEEM@)T PROM LINCOLN RANCRO COCAMONGA ASSOCIATES, A CALIFORNLI PARTNERSHIP AND AOTRORIZIT~ 17IE MAYOR AND CITY CLEPIC TO S1GN SAME 4. Approval to gazd professional aervica agrageat for 25 COnatruCClOn anNging for eha COnatruCtiOn Of Ya[ar plan aeon duina 4-N. 4-P and h0 (AagagMt District 86-2) io J. P. I4pp sad /usociacu, incorporated for eba count of $6,622.00 to ba fmdad frw Raveaw A/anwaov. Funding is eoecingani on Hond ulna. 5. Approval to ward profassioaal aesoica agragant for 27 conatrectioo adainiaeration and inspaeiioo for eha cowenction of suraz plan aion drain 1-N, 1-P and h0 (Aauagant District 86-2) to Doa Csaak and Assoeiataa for eha goant of $57,739.00 eo ba fmdad frw Ravamy Assessants. Fording is continent on boed solos. 6. Appzeval to arard profusiowl wrviee agngent for 29 soil^ and otarials tutisg for iha construction of maatar plan stop drains 1-N, 4-P and 4-0 (bgawaet District 86-2) to Piowar Coeaultaota for tha Yomt of $2.888.00 to ba fmdad trw Ravmw bpsatants. Pundina is ennti aS.n~ ... M_A ~~--- 1. Approval of Coetraet mango Ordar No. 1 (CO 87-14) for 31 eha praparaLioe of plans, spaeificatiaw and eatiaaua for tha AtN VII Stop Drain, coetract rorkiega rith G. P. S. Consul tang Gtvil Engiwara is eha uomt of $5,500 rbich is rithin eha l0E cantingaucy bringing eha contract total to S50,820 to ha funded by Draiuga Fords aed zaiaburud by Housing Sat-Aaida Pmds. RHSOLUTION N0. 87-170 38 A RESOLUTION OP TRH CITY COUNCIL OP TAE CITY 0! RANCRO WCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROPING CONYIUCT CRANGB ORDER N0. 1 TO C.O. / 87-14, ~ ~ A PROl23SI0NAL SBAVICES AGREEIi$iT POR THE PREPARATION OP ftANB, SPECIFIGTIONS AND ESTIMATES POR THE ARG VII STORM DAMN ~ ~~, ter; .~ -- • City Council Agenda April 15, 1987 PAGE 1~ 8. Approval of Contract Chsage Order No. 1 (CO 86-81) for 39 the preparation of a Coaputerised Standard Spacificstioa Syatea by NorrirRapke, Inc, in the arouar of $7.300, bringing the total contract count to $17,700.00 ro be paid frw byat~a Developaenr Fund.. RffiOLUTION NO. 87-171 43 A RHSOLOTZON OF THE CITT COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RUICNO COGMONGA, GLIFORNIA, APPROFINO WNTRACf CRAtR:E ORDER N0. 1 TO C.O. 86-81, A ~ PROFHSSIONAL SHRVICHS AGRH@$NT FOR TNH PRHPARATION OF A COMPOTERIZHD SPHCIPIGTION SYST07 9. Approval to ezecute agre~ant for inatallation of 44 public itprovrent and dedication (of right-of-ray) banveen Jerrold H. biy and Sieglinde R. Bing and the City of Rancho WcYOnga for strut frontage laQTwaal\ata ae 8510 and 8576 Arrar Roata. R640LUTION N0. 87-172 54 A RE30L11TION OF THE CITY COONCIi. Ot TRB CITY OP RANCRO WGMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGRHIDffi!f POR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC ItOMtOVE}IEtlT AND DEDIGTION FROM JBRROLD H. HiING AND SI$LINDE R. IDiIl~ MiD ANTRORIZING TYIH MAYOR AND C.YTt R.eor Tn _,,, ,,,,,.,, 10. Approval to a=seep agzNUnr for the installation of 55 public iaprwaaeat and dedication (of right-ofway) batmen Lae D. Senniaga, Ls Jeoainga, Leria D. Jaaniap, Mildred L. Byes., and Marjorie D. Barrisa aad the 0117 0! Raaebo Q~monga for atreee froaeaga Lprov~aota •t 8624 Artov Roau. Rffip,OTION N0. 87-173 62 A RESQ.UTSON OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCRO WCANONGA, GLIFORNLA, ACCEPTING AN AGREID44R7T POR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC Ii1PRWElOIIiT AND OHDIGTION PROM LEE D, J~VIII}R;S, LBWI8 C Jffi7NItL'S, MII.DRID L. BYARS ' ' I i AND MARJORIE D, DHIRiIDH AND AOTNORI2IIF: 1YiH MAYOR AND CIT! CLHRR TO SICN SA/IH 11. Approval to aracuu agraraat for iaatallatioa of 63 public i~prw~ent and dadiGtioa (of right of-ray) betreea Dona M. Pilaa aad eha City of Rancho Cucagooga for attest frontage iaprwe~enU ^t 8556 Arrw Route. }-v ...t; ~_.f ., ~~ ~ • • City Council Agenda April I5, 1987 PAGE RESOLUTION N0. 87-174 71 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCII. OP TAE CITY OP RANCHO COCANONCA, CALIFORNIA, ACCBPTING AN AGREEMRlT POR INSTALLATION OP PUBLIC IMPROVBiffiiT AND DEDIGTION PROM DONNA M. PILAN AND AOYHORI2ING 111E MAYOR AND CITE Q.ERR R'0 SIGN SANG 12. Appraaal to e:ecuie a{raeamt for iwtallation of 72 public iapraveasat and dedication (of right-aE-vay) betraen RoNanw Rin{, John Dalrochw wd Eduard L. Balvochw and the Gity of Aanebo Cucatonga Eor street fronta{e iaprov~enb at 8643 Arran Ronta. RESOLOTION NO, 87-175 78 A AESOLOTION OP TH6 CITT COUNCII. OP 17iE CITT OP RANCHO WGMDRIGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTIII6 AN AGAERWI'P FOR INSTALLATION OP P1IELIC I!D!AWdNID7T AND DEDIGTION lRdl ROSEANN6 RIlRi, JOHN EALNOCEOS Atm SWARD DALNOIXUS AND AUIIIORIZING TAE MAlOA AID! CITY C(.ERR TO 9IGN SAME 13. Approval to authorise the adoertiaiog of Lhe "NOtica 79 Iwiting Bide" for the Esker Avanw and Arran Route store Drain and Screet Lprovwent Project. The 6ngiwar~^ aatiaau for cowtructiw is 51.534,000 to be forded h. vyat~" ?~_I^ .:=t '- D..iuagr Honda aaa reiabursed 17 Rowing Set-A--Side tunda. RESOLUTION N0. 87-176 80 A RESOLUTION OP 196 CITT CWNCII. O/ 1718 CITT OP RAN4I0 WCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIPIGTIONS FOR 1N6 "BARER AVRiOE AND ARROW RWT6 STORK DRAIN AND STREET I!@RWRffi1T PRC176CT", IN SAID CITY AND AUTNORIZ IIAS AND DIRECTING TN6 CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 14. Approval to emecuta a{rs~ent fez iaatallatioo of 84 public iaprovsasnta (Under{rounding of Utilities) i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ beteaan Richrood Developaegt Company and tba City of Wncho Cunaon{a Eor the mdergrouadin{ of utilities slon{ ~srov Route for Trace 12621. ~~ ~' r4 _, `,. ~ ;~f Citp Council Agenda April 15, 1987 PAGE RESQOTION N0. 87-177 93 A RBSOLUTION OP TRH CITY COUNCIL OP THR CITY OP RANCHO C(ICAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCRPTINO AN AGR800D1T FOR INSTALLATION OP PUBLIC IMPROFHl~NTS (I11H)RRORWNDIIA: OP OTIL ITI83) FROM RSCRUOOD DHPRLOPMHNT COMPANY POR TRACE 12621 AND AIITROAIZINC T8H MAYOA AND CITY QEIIX TO SION SAMH 15. Approval to e:ecnU iaprw~aat exuaaion agse~an~a 94 for Tracts 12936, 12938, 12939 and 12943. located iv the Ceryn Pleuwd Coaamaiq, auh~itud h7 Marlborough Dwalopaent Corposatioa RssauTlDM ND. a7-17a lao A RHSacoxsoM or INa CITY CDDNCa oP TRS CITz of RAN®0 Ol~1MONDM CALIPORNT/1, APPAOpIM0 IMPRWHM~i'1' A2'ID73IOM ACRHRloIIPfS AND Il1PR09HMRNT SEWRITIES POR TMCTS 12936, 12938, 12939 AlID 12913 16, Approval to a=acute i~prw~ant aztanaiop agrarant for 101 Parcel Map 8815, located oa the vast aide of Henl Avaaw, south of 19th Staeq anhsietad h7 Citation Noaee, RffiOI.OTION N0. 87-179 104 A RE90LDTION OP 1EH CZT! COUNCIL 0! THB CITY OP RANCHO COCAMDtAIA, CALIFORNIA, APPROPING Il1PROpHMHNT RI3'RNSION AGRRR!ffiCf AND 1NPRWIDffi7T SHCOAITY POR PARCHI. MAP 8815 17. Approval of up, aacutioa o[ iaprweaant gn~eut and 105 iaprwesaat wcurit7 for parcel sap 10185, located on ehe aonchaut comer of Highland and Milliken Avanwe, avbaitted t7 The Nilliaa Lyoo Company. RRSOLUTION NO. 87-380 116 A RHSOLUTION OP THE CITY C011NCIL 0! THH CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONIA, CAL IPORNIA, APPRWIMi PARCRL MAP N0. 10185, {TH1CfAT1PA PARCHL lIAP i ' ' ' ' ' N0. 10185), IlRROppffiiT AGRHmffi7T, AND 2NPRWIH~NT SHCURITY ~'.ti ~'y~, C~ '. ~r =r~ ;ter' PAGE Ciq Cowcil Agenda April 13, 1937 • • iB. Approval to rslaue agreaaants for Poatpon~ant of 117 CC6R'• foe Tract 13039, lowed aott6 of Bsw Liaa and eui of Dasr Crssk C3anw1 is pietoria Plsaaed Coaaunity. RESOLDTION N0. 87-181 110 A AESOLOTION OP THE CITT COONCIL OP TAE CIT4 0! RANISO QJGIOfgiA, CALIFORNIA, RII.BASItx: AN M,REEMRIT POA POSTPONEIffiiT OP APFAOpAL OF CCiR'3 POR TAACT 13039 19. Approval to accept i^ptw~anis, raluu of bonds and 121 Notice Of fwplation: Tract 13131 located oa the northeut corner of Arror RoaC• and pingard M.anw. 141eus: richfai wnonaar• naafi (strwt) Svz,soo Acespt: Maiatsaanw Gwraataa Dowd (Et[NC) $ 17,230 RESOLOTION N0. 87-182 122 A RESOLD?ION OP TAE CITT OOUNCIL 0! THE CITT OP RAN080 QICAMON:A_ r~r •w.el~ nwar`•Ii'ai 111E PDELIC IMPAOpE11AiT3 POR TRACT 33131 AND AOT80RIZI12. THE PIL IN: OP A NOTICE 08 ODNPLETION fOR THE NOAE Tract 11625 located on ^ portioe of Nsaou Avanw 124 batrsea 19th Scrut and Righlaad Msaw Rdwa: Psitdful Psrtonanes Doad (Street) $423,300 Accept: i i i N.ioienance Gaaraatse Band (S[reet) $ 42.330 -.~ _t. ~~~ ,S i' ~ City Council Agenda April 15, 1987 PAGE RESOLUTION N0. 87-183 125 A R850LUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING THE PUDLIC IMPROF&fRi'1'S POR TRACT 31625 AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OP A N01'ICE OP COl~LETION POR THE WORK Tract 11423 locaead on the uat aide of Gntar Avenue 127 ewth of Church Strut. Raleaae: Faithful Parfonuc• Bond (Strut) $ 70,000 Raleua: Maioumnca Cmraaeaa eon (Stmt) $ 3,500 AESOLUTION NO. 87-184 129 A RESOLUTION 0! THE CIT! COOIiCII. O! THE C13T O[ RAN(SO COCAMONGA, GLIFOIUI~/y ~ ACCEPTIIT. 17IE PUELIC I!Q'ROFR09iY'S FOA TRACS 11781 AND AOTRORI2ING THE P7LING O! A NOTICE OP COMPLETION FOR THE HORK 20. Approval of Reaolutioo authorising the daatruction of 132 records in Adainiatration/Parunnel. RB90LUTION NO. 87-185 132 A AESq.UTION OP THE CIT! CODNCIL 0! THE CITY OP RANCHO WCAMONGA, CALIPORNLA, ADTHORIZ ING THE DBSTROCTION 0! CIT! RECORDS AND 004Nffi!TS WHZCH ARE NO LONGER R~OIRED AS PROFIDBD Ut0)ER GWEANMENT CODE SECTION 34090 21. Approval of Resolution ordering preparation of 135 Aupportioment Report for Tract Nap 9649 viihin eha Alta Lma Channel. RESOLUTION NO. 87-186 136 ~ , , ~ A RESOLUTION OP THE CIT4 COUNCIL OF TA8 CITY i OP RANWO COCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA. ORDERIIR•. THE PREPAMTION OT A REAPPORTIONMRTf RBPORT AND ANR7DED ASSBSSMR7T AND DIAGRAM IN ASSESSMENT DISTRSCT AND ESTADLISHING REAPPORTIONlOSiT PEES POR TRACT 9649 WI1EA1 THE ALTA 'OMA aANNe(. .~:~~. ~~~ .. t~ ~. -. ,.,.. • City Council Agenda April 15, 1987 PAGE 22. Appzwal of Resolution apprw iag purchase agremeat 138 rith Undarrriter, Stoaa sad Youngberg for Aaaeatnani District 86-2. RESOLUTION N0. 87-187 139 A RESOLUTION OP TH8 CITY COUNCIL OP TH8 CITY• OP RANCHO QICANONGA, GLIPORNIA ACCEPTING A PROPOSAL POR SALE OP BONDS AND MARI1{, OTRER DETAIlIINATIONS 23. Approval of paid sad unpaid liar and authorising 14Z iaawaca of bonds for Rancho Ll,emonga Drainage Asmsman[ Mstrict 86-2 36 the apprasiuta mount of $2,122,143. RESOLUTION HO. 87-188 143 A AESQ.UTION OF TEE CITY OOUNCII. OP TR6 CITY OP VAECHO WCAIbNGh CALIFORNIA DETEREIHING UNPAID A336ES1W1T8: DE87G17AT2NG PAYING AGENT. AUTHEItfIGTING AGENT. TVANSFER AGENT AHD RR:IBTRAR: AND PROPIDING POR ISSUANCE OP BWmB UNDER TEE IIBIIOFEMRFf bOl7R ACT OP 1915 Z4. Approval o! Resolution posing on Mapportiooant 172 Aaport for Parcel lYp 9670 ritbin the 9ixeh Sesmt Industrial Park Aefmdin{ District ({2-1R), Giving pzeliaioary approval, and mttin{ s eiae and place for public hmrin{. RffiOLPfZON NO. 87-189 iii A RESQ.UTION O! THE CITY COUDICII. OP TIIE CITY OP RANCHO CDCAlONGM CALIFORNIA, PASSING ON AEAPeoRTIDNeoa+T REPORT. GIVINf: PRII.IMINARY APRIWAL, Alm SETTING A TIME AND PLACE !OR i POELIC HEAVING 25. Sat public burring - Mry 6, 1937 - APPEAL OP TRNTATIVE TMCT 13316 - PRIEDMAN HOMES -Appeal of Plmning Coe~isaioo'a deeirioa spprwiag the orientation of Gases backia{ onto Grrari Street and the raquirmenta of the local egwatrim trails and ebe teepin{ of horaa^ fora toCal ruidantial davalopant of 113 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ single Emily lots on 84.5 acrm of land in the Very Lw Rnidantial Diatzicc (lens ehm 2 drellin{ uaiu par acre), located at the northnst cocnar of Archibald Avenw and Grrari Stzaat - APN 201-071-14, 37, and 45. r'r ~'~+i ~^', ..1 r ry • ~, City Council Agenda April 15, 1987 PAGE • 26. Sat pablic hearing for Hay 6, 1987 to conduct • TEPRA 175 hearing for the propored rafundiag of Radevelopent Agency TA 84-1 Tas Allocation Bonde. D- OO~T ORDIYIICSg TDa lollosiag Osdimcaa Dts~ Dad Pablie Daasiaga at W Liao of fisat zeatdiag. DacoW xsadiaga ass esyaetW to M rnstir and ooa-e9atsasarsial. Tfq sill D. aesad Qa ~ tN Coraeil at od sir slt6oat diaoaasioo, TDe CIeP Clerk sill seM W tiele. day itr eao b• rrared fot disewiaa. NO ITBHS SODMITT® R 10YQfIR® lODLIC iRdRIiD TDa follasiag iter Me 6eea ad-asdaN ad/es pwead ao pabiic haaaiaYa r ts~a(sad DP lr. Al Iaais sill ePoo cDa aaatiag Lo rse»iso prblis eaadaoaY, 1. COMIUNITS DE9dtpPl~iT DLOCR CAANT APPLIGTION PISCAL 176 YEAR 1987 88. PINAL STATElmPf OP OOMMONIT! ODJECTIVES - Revier of CDDC 83nt1 Statrant of Oormity Obj actives and ulectioa of projects for the fiscal rear 19R7-RR. oarea oo sn anticipated grant of 5409,000. RTSCLOTION N0. 87-190 179 A RESOLOTIOH OP TAE CITT COONCIL OP TAE CITY OP AANatO L4GlflNCA, CALIPORIIIA, ADOPTING TAE FINAL STATEMENT OP COMMINIT! OD.TECTIVES AND SELECT' PRQTECTS TOR lONDING POR THE COIOd)NITT DEVA.OP!ffiiT DLOCE GRANT PROGRAM POR PISGL 2EAR 1987-88 2, ENVIROID~7'fAL A99688MENT AND TBRRA VISTA PLANN® L85 COlDfONITT AMENDHp7T 86-02 - WESTERN PROPERTIES - A request to rend the Tarn Vista Pl anwd Corunity bq ~ ~ ' ' eatablirhing a Dwieus Park Wesley 2oae for areas deeignand a Office Park, Corarcial and Mized Up , rithin the Planned Caasmity Domdaq - APN 1077-421-06, 1077-091-17. ~l~:, r`. r~ .. yr ~~.%~ City Council Agenda April 19, 3987 10 ~ ' OLUTION NO. 87-191 209 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITT COUNCII. OP 1R8 GI1R OP RAMWO CIiCAMONGA, CALTLKIRNIA, DENYItar. TP.RRA VISTA PLANNID COMMUNZIT AfoZNDNRlT 86-02, A REQDEST IY) MODIFY TH8 COMNUNI3T I A.ANN® i.'BETT 8Y EBTAELISNINO A EUSINESS PARR W®tLAT ZONE FOR AREAS DBSIGNED AS OFPIC6 PARK DISTRICT, OD158SRCIAL DIS1RICf, AND MIEED USE DISTRICT, NIStiIN 1N8 ftANN® COMMDIiI17 EOU1mART 3. ERVIRON!®iTAL A3S68SMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMQ7DMR(T I 211 86-09D - CT1'f OP RANCHO CDCAMONCA - A re+(uuC to vend the Lsnd Uae Elaaant of Ganarel Flan frw Lowl4diw Density Ruidential (4-8 drallio8 uaiee/acre) eo Laa Deeaicy Rtaidutial (2-4 Mreiline mitahcra) sad/or Very l.wr Deaaiq Aeaidutial (leu than 2 dnellin8 unite/acre) fos 68 ecru of lud located at the aouthreae coroer of Nilaoa (if e:tandad) sad Millikaa iif ertaaded) - APN 201-191-11, 17. (Related to DOA 86-OS). RESOLUTION N0. 87-392 .• I 272 I ~ ~ ~ I ~ TNEA RUSE Q.IDIRET Ot 2EE~RANCHO QICAMDNOA ~.".':Sui:neNTAL ASSR48MR11' AND DEpR.OPMBtfP DISTRICT AMRiDll~iif ob-0~- CITE OP RA)ILNO CDCAMONCA - A ragwat to vend t6a Dav~lopanc lHatriet Map frw "PC" (Pl ood Coneroi) sad RM" (Loe-l4diw Dewitp Residential - Z-0 dvellin8 uita/acre) and/or "V3." (Very Lar Density Ruidantial - 1W than 2 drelling uoita/acn) for 68 ecru o! land located at the aoutheaat corner of Nilson (if aaterdad) and Milliken (if tatendad) - APN 201-191-11, 17. ORDINANCE N0. 310 I Z73 AN ORDINANCE 0! 1N8 CI17 COUNCIL OP SHE GIST OP RANRIO CUCAlR)NGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSORS pARCm. NOl~ER 203-191-11, AND 17 LOCAT80 ON 66 ACRES ON SR6 SQIIHNEST CORNER OP 1H6 E7:TlNSIONS OP NILSON ANO MILLIEEN PROM "PC" AND "LM (A-B DNE[.LINC UNITS/ACRE) TD "I," (2-A A1ffi~LSit) UNITS/ACRE) ~ r'~ri. :. ,r . ~^; -,r_ PAGE City Coweil Agenda April 15. 1987 11 • 5. BSNIROtEO:NfAL ASSHSSNENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMffiiDMQ)1' 274 87-02A - C11S OP RANCNp COCANON('A - A rsgwst to ueod th• Circulsrion ffia^^at of the Gswral PlN for th• purpou of accoapli^hing the follwiag ch^nges: A. The artN^ion of Nilson Menw, fru CJrnalian G Strwt to Archibald MNw, rbich lnd edu ~~G"~ existing rosdr^y bab^an Archibald and Nathyst, ~~ ~. ud 1/4 aii• nut of Carnali^n and Caroalian. ~ ~.LKt ~ S. The dalation of Eagan Scrut frog appro:iutaly 3700 fut sue of R^rN MNw to Nilson Avanw ~~%~ ^ad ch^ ^stanaion of Ewan StrNt trc~ ,, '4. appro:Lstaly 3700 tnt nut of Ravse Menw to ~ ~' the iataraaction of 6tirNda Mares ^nd Suuit . Manes. _ ~' •-~ ~ C. Ths sata^^ion of Nilson MNw traa approa3astaly V~~'` 400 fut nut of Caniaesl MNw to the anat. D, 7h^ aztauion o! RechaK^r Manes frt~ Highl^nd Mamu to noreb of propoNd Daoyu MNw, E. Ifia dalation of Nillilun MNw ~!1'c~ approzlaatsly 1300 fNt aoet6 of Nilson Maow CO Nilson Manes alo^g its currad aligaNt and Iha azcanaiN of Nillilcs^ Mama Iron approaiaataly 1300 fast south of Nilson MNw eo Nrth of Nilson Manes. P. The addition of N mns.n ~_~:: a::..iu rroa Nr0 $LrNt to eha Werth and being approai^auly 1000 fNt rut of and pasallal to EtirNda MNw; Nd, eha artNaion of Eut MNw north of 24th EtrNt. AESOLiTf2011 N0. 87-193 278 A RESOLOTION 0! TEE CITY COONCIL 0! TN6 CIT! o! RAN~o QICAlDICA, CALIFORNIA. APPRapnlc ' GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 87-02A AlOIIiDING TAE CIRQI3.ATION BL@lE77T O! THE RANCRO COCAM7)FA GENERAL PLAN 6. ORDERING THE NORR II7 CONNECTION NI171 ANNRATION N0. 20 288 POR TRACT N09. 32650-2~ 11772 ANp 13142 IVARIOIJS i I ~ ~ LOCATIONS TNR001'NOOT THE CITI) TO STRESf LIGHTING MAINTR7ANC6 DI ICT N0. 1. ~n ~ ~ r `;/ City Council Agenda April IS. 1987 ' OTION N0. 87-194 • A RffiOLOTION OF TNH CI1'T COUNCIL OF THH CITY 0! RANCHO WCANDNGA, CALIFORNIA, OADBRING THE MORE IN WNNHCTION WTTR ANNBEATION N0. 20 2'0 STREW LIGHTING NAINTRIANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND ACCEPTINL• THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT BOR TRACT NOS. 12630-2, 12772 AND 13192 7. OIIDERIN4 1NE NORR IN ~NNECTION NITH AM7ffiATION R0. 32 FOR 'TRACT NOB, 12650-2 AND 12772 (YABIOOS 7.OCATTOBS TRRGOGROOT_ TAE CITT) M LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO__1. RffiOLPTION ND. B7-195 A RffiOLOTION 0! THE CITS COUNCIL 0! THE CITT o! RAN(80 CBCAlR11GA. CALIlOgNIA, ORDEIIIAG 1RE WORE IN COIINBCTION WTIH AIAIQATMN lp. 32 TO LANDSCAPE MAINi'OpNCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND ACCEPTING TAE FINAL mIGINER'S RETORT !OR TRACT Nos. 12650-2 AND 12772 8. ORDERING THE WORE CONNECMON WITH AIg16ATI0N ND. 15 i0R CT NDB. 2850-2 Alm 12 72 VAAI0U8 LOGTIONg TAIWUGNOOT 1HE CIT! TO STAFFS LIGNTIIR. MAIN'1'lQIANCE • DTSSRICT N0. 2. RESOLUTION N0. 87-198 A Rw?n!~. ~- Ce 1R6 CIl'! COUNCII. O! THE CITT OF RANC30 QNCAIDNGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORE IN CONNECTION WISH AN1NffiATION N0. 18 TO STREET' LIGRTIM: MAIIPTWANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND ACCEPTIIR7 TSE FINAL 9R:2NERl' S REPORT POR TMCT N08. 12850-2 A18) 12772 9. ORDERING THE IpRR IN CDNNECPION WITH ANNElATION N0, 5 POR TM NO8. 1 192 VISTA TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 AND STREET LIGNTINC MAINTAUNCE DISTRICT N0. 4. REBR.UTION N0. 81-197 A RffiOLU'TION 0! THE CIS! COUNCIL OP TRH CITY OP RAAICAO EAGlDNCA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERIW THE I I I I I I NORR IN CONNECTION WITH ANNRATION N0. 5 TO {I LANDSGPE MAINI3NANCE DTSTRICf N0. • AND ACCEPTING THE lINAL ffiiCINEAt'8 REPORT POR TMCT N0. 13192 PAGE 12 288 289 295 294 303 304 309 ji ,. r ..'~ fin. ~rr~; ~~ PAGE City Council Agenda April 15, 1987 13 • • O RPSOLUTION N0. 37-193 315 A RHSOLUTSON OF THE CITY COONCIL OP TN6 CZTY OP RANCHO COGtt)NGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TRB WORK IN CONNECTION WITB ANNgATION N0, 5 TO STREBT LIGRTING MAINTRiANC6 DISTRICT NO. 4' AND ACCEPTING TEE PZNAL ffiE:1NEPlt'S REPORT POR TRACT N0. 13192 8. tODLIC 9EAEIBDE 1Le tollaeisf itaw hne m legal pabliutim ec poaeieg ra~vt.raeaeta, The i>,air Brill epee W aaecieg co reeei~e pablie tptieoq. ~~ 1. CONSIDERATION O8 MDD~. CODES CITT O8 RANCRO 316 WCAMDOCA - 2ntroduceion of Otdidnce and Besting public 6eatiag for Mq 20, 1987, for the parpoaa of adopting by refareece variona codas a published b8 the Iegtweional Coaltrenea of building Ofticial^ and/or tba Intereational Alaociecion Qb P1o•bing and Machaaiul Officials or the National Pira Protection /uaociatian, ORDINANCE N0. 311 (tirK ruding) 318 AN ORDINANCE O8 T'pE CITI OOUNCIL O[ THE CIT7 u" iuwuiu VUGAMOM.A, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING QIAPT6R3 15.OA. 15.03, 15.12. 15.16, 15.20. 15.24 AND 15.28 O8 TITLE 15, DtlILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION, O8 TSE RANQ10 WCAMONGA MUNICIPAL OOD6 IN '!HEIR ENTIEETT, AND SECTIONS 2, 3, 4. 7, 9, AND 10 OP THE SAN DERNARDINO OOIiHTB CODE ADOPT® DT ORDINANCE 17; AND ADOPTSIRi DT RE[ERRICE THE "UNI80RM i AOMINISTMTIPE CODE", 1985 EDITION: TNH "UNI80RM OUTGOING CODE". 1985 BDZTION II74.ODING ALL APPR7DIC63 THERETO: THE "UNIFORM BOIi.D3NG gpDt 3TANDARDS". 3985 EDITIONS THE "IINI80RM MECHANIGV, ODDE", 1985 EDITION II1CLtJDING ALL A PP~7DICE3 TNERET02 THE I M "UNIFORM PLUM IMi WDE", 1985 ®ITTON i i ~ i INCLUDING ALL APPENDICES; 1HE "NATIONAL 6LSCTRICAL CODE", 1907 IDITION; TOE "UNIFORM CODB POR TRB ADATAffi1T O8 DANGEROUS BV ILDINf33", 1985 ®ITIONi TMB 'RIN180RN HOUSING GDDE", 1985 IDITION: TRH "UNIPCRM BUILDING SECDRITT CODE", 1985 EDITIONi WITH CERTAIN AMENOlIENTB, ADDITIONS, D~,ETIONS AND EBCEPTIONS TO SAID CODES, 47Q,UD1N6 PENALTIES -~.`~,-1 rACe City Cowcil Agenda April 15, 1987 14 r1 U 2. AMENDMRPI TO SECTION 10 OP THE MUNICIPAL CODE 374 ESTAELISIIItR: A SPEED LIMTT ON CE1R'ER AVEN06 PROM ' FOOTIi1LL BOULEVARD TO CAURCR STREET: ON LDDN AVENUE PROM AACHIBALD AVENGE TO HAVEN AVENGE; ON SPROCE AVENGE PROM ELM AVElR7E TO BASE LING ROAD: ON TORNAt AVmiOE PROM POOTNILL EOUI,EVARD TO DA86 LING AND ON VICTORIA NINDR0G3 LOOPS NDR19 ATN 30019). I ORDINANCE q0. 312 (tint reading) 378 AN oRDINANCE or rna CIT! COUNCIL or ass CITT Ot RANCHO COC~1lbHGA, CALIFORNIA, SECTION 10.20.020 Or THE RAMCHO OOG1N0lE;A. CITP CODE AS.ARDING PRIMA lACI6 SPEED LIlIITS UPON CERTAIN CITT STREETS a. cln wnaPa~R srArr nxaes ~ lello~iq ter ds sot legally t'Ma~ ul P'~2ie eastleoq, altbsgl; tLo Gale ~ apse tM eutlsg for ' pablle tryst. . . 1. STATUS REPORT R!lr.ARDINO IIRROVpm1I AGRREgIR AIID 781 na'ROVE)®Pr saaRlTr FoR TRACT 11997 LOGSED oN TH6 soG19EAET CDRIRR OF B AVmR1E AMD H 8IDE ROAD ~ sGBM1TI® : NORDIC DEPQ.OrM11T. aoNrmm APRs. 1. 19E7 temp RffiOLOTION N0. 57-199 396 A RESOLOTION 0! SNE CITS COONCIL OP THE CITT O8 RANCHO WGMOIGA. CALIFOWIIA. APPROVING IMRWAffipT ACREBMIDIT. ZIlpAR0Y81®IT SECGAITI, I AMO FINAL MAP Or TRACT N0. 11997 2. DOILDIN6 ABATEM@1T 10153. 24111 STREET - Ragwat to sat 397 huring o[ appeal pnrswat to Bolding Official~a order i i to abate • daagarow bonding. i ~,~4~ ~r. :j -. ~J • F City Comtil Agenda ~e~~~~ PAGE • e •kd April 15, 1987 15 B. ODDiCII, HO871®gS autW by CM Clty Coaoril t ~ e for diaoerir, 7lSay are mt although the mair ary opr W naatiagitor pahiio cope[. 1. AD 1637 (EApBS) - Diatwaioa of propaaed legislation Jqg which would Crrte the San Heroardino County 'haffic Cerigioa rit6 • arbarahip oonsiatiag of the Board of Director of SAtAAC and would authorL• ibe Coeeisaion, rich rjoriq votes approval, to iapop a 1S retail traareiioo and uM ta: to firoq bighrq and local trenapottatioa Lprwrent• ie San Derrrdino Couoty. 2. NACLHp TRAIN A17U AH 1839 - Diacwsioo of superapaad 402 trace eo provide aetvice bebrn Lu papa and Ontario, sad AH 1839 propord legidation to crrta a bi-anee coririon to atady sad potentially Lplraat prof att. I. IDllylyl~ll4 Op ITr! HR id1' IQl1iC , 73fia L the [ir for tlq Cored to identity tM itra they eriah to diaera at tM ae:t awatieg. lhaaa itra Hill ~di~ as sLia wtiag, rly 14ntiliM for tie J. ODNlO4CJTI00 P9011 '!~ tOg1.IC Ihia L the tine ad place !er she pseral public to address the City Ceeacil. L JDJOOR9trR I, Hreely ti Jathelat, Clty Clack of tM City o! Reecho Iberoep, 6arehy cartiiy that a err, atcerata oepy o! the toregoiq agaeala eea punted r JprLl 10, 1987. aearty-two r to sM aretiag Per J.D. 267 at 9320-C ( Haan Line Rvad Adj ouro to 7:00 p. n. on Nay 6, 1987 in order to hold c joie[ City Council snd Redavdopeent Agency Beating. f" =+~1 w. -, C';.% •V1 NUNNrNVpNNN-PWr-PPN +f OO.MpO-Vr'Vp+O VN-PnWprE • .p.a. a n.Le srr rrs s rs wmp .msr rt+ i.oem.. •rr n~oe Gen ~nrrjlYYSrf±m~+Vm. mnVCT 2n'<NZrmT1 OCiyiOp.n~+ m'li ~.rl Np n rI1~Y C r si m ~NaDrm °aii°NjTS mii ~e~ nNN< Q r~ioi~~~f ~e~ ~e~ aN ~ mimi r ier+z ra Cy TON ZON n- D el ONm V' NIn r< 2r m• rpm -2 Di ZN ^N ~n _m D) Nm (1 a m«smTmrm ir~m ~)m<arSYnim< MsaiC~~~cinmmTi i~C'~a ~~nFr+i °e~. ~ zy~'r3 as 72jAN ~ °ai+i j°m~±° n°M mi°Nni c_N . zT~e ein y~yrorn :omy re ~~r~.r. e'N~ii oo°isiyn~m m -zi L^ewj.ii~°Nm~~riEe~T~ - O La ya~ii NGyN'iVTwy ^ N' T rGCti~i11~C rm` iGm m m C OmTr~r ~r )~E T1 r T yay< i 2 iwN NnN. m rn r~l V N 2rr u~O W• C PO ~-oe r smi 'm N i °z mPm+t n 22 a A A Z P Z m n m T i • i N N N N WW...pea... p .y0.4 r'°N-LP V O ii:c~~~`~szz s o G~s~^^N~m:~ G r ~~mT;.~ ~.~a ~~TNT~w jyei ~ T (~(% aDNm n ^)^eI11T mntr ^ ^ ..~ mNn y"ii n io mN~. N~ . zz i ni i >r a O 00 2 Y O __ O °e w:NNN:TmNO 1! VijiNVini i iaisinyi~~ i n .zrrs.am~~~e z '~ rz, rNLTn.iO~f 'ii } iNeipi• air r ° zz °a=iT <i~ rismT y ) W (~~nl~m f st.zNa r° } ej ri n OON nyi n M: f. a O T ~ j mg s r ~ x< A A~ a A r> ry Nj°i VWriV WVVwVwWWUWWyyyy urrVVr-WWWWWW m..~..'p M1..p..Oppl~~0 J.ps~OVyyVyV yNNNNNNNwwr~.--~-~-.~+eoo~^ ~~no as+.Ja O'N+wN-ea.... N+wN-nap~P~ ~~-ga°~iNi ~• - N -Nw°e NW W$~eeN.N °nao++ + aw:~N ~sw~ o-aeo..~p-~+ nWL'noLobui~o p~*o~pooL~%.~u O-OOON010.OOOJl~O e00a-iONw WJW~~P aeiy~y ~i`i"i N i~w..~iu+Eo mm+~o u+i ~ o oio°oo °o o.+.i~oo v °o i y O i m s 1 ; 1 ^ ~ _ I O 1 n Si i iz € ~e iz r a ~D T i i .- NgJgOYwwNWJbWOJ.d YYWVSbWb~rJJYJP Vb1P dOVNyWrW ~INOyb 1wP rdJPe lTm OrTTT'w`rTmO PbPgJY p T ^ a OWPP^M bNJ JP ~~9P)w~~N TnnYb 11 F flm nNnn<~~Y>~YmTw~~Y\nnn P b> TIP•-s°TyYaY°^a>z eu>~~bm aieos~~'~ N3c~o?e>nrrnen a>m zwi-Im ± '^aemzmyY ^ ^i a Tremm~ ~imiann ii *ar.ne _wio' ~` Tz~ ni nlr~~;Ae~wi as m`."u Ia~mY^ ~SrN >2~~~ NO OOyim2 n n. mu^i 1nCr ZOi ~^~r> CZ SOaO S O ~ "Sa '°"N n ~~ a ~ a~ Nn i ' 'F' 3 N n ~ n ~ ~ O _ r 2 N m 9 n f imni am~m ° ~n2ZDwC2i ^~ mT _ °s ~.a..a. S n ti9b2 n » bw O oi°^ a SNy2i m ~~ A •ry r N YN r JvNr ubi<Y~NnY 1_w C \ !ia' < >9i ~2iOTyaxi Nb O Y nr r4 O 1n N m0 YI T 9m1 nN N~OY Y _O> rOnn Ym^ Tb92Nm>PY N O TT f ~ N N~ H N^Op TmP NS myN \~ T m ~ r m= ~ ~ i)LN OfrN~. ^ >NT •rm n c ^J ^ Nn mnMCnVN. nNnN n '" min ° ~° oar-v n.- m N nn 'i i ms ianN r r°n °' m..'T'~ m9 a N9 r'zi oz aisz ~ ^ zx a i aA i m m 1 s I I 1 ~ li T i N ,~ -~ ~ m r r N V Y -• ~ ~•~ i z ~ ~ a ii i Yk"'seYoa~Ngrrrr..y rr......rr yy 11uu NN ~ W OYP NJPPTP NNNNUNVb1pgJJJAd~7P~7WWOOIJWrWWWWW 1~ ^ WNrO~P OYOMJWNrOdO PNjWNrOd b.IANV~N~Odu ~9 ~~ 2 .;1 r i i N ;` Ngr.~OBr rWNJw JN WW J 9 r'O UNq NRN WVOJNWN J`r " _ ~~_ l; ONyWOp JJOP~WOWWMOONWPNNOJ UWiO\nNbWdP?N O NPOOpOONJJ.JWVO dOJrPON ~ m AO y dJNOJI000dONONONOWPNJnNOP WyYjW000OO~py ~• N C~ • • }O VPWPlVNPWNppW!!!N rW1PrNr>rrrr~rpN Orr 1 ppPper Wrr iplrpWppN-OP l~'<Nf NONNN~ylwpONMrW If 1 • fnTNTTi1O14y n=y ~+Z ZS rr:~ ~r%r ^ri giZll Y ~m ~ j~Crr~+ 1Z nC}SM(rnf r}A Cpnii=f na~irfmrf+a 1 f°}>O~Yp rr I+Sm^13 ~O2y ^~rJ< r~ rTrrmm Z>mrN •}>fIT>s%r•arairl Na •Zfw aN i ~ ZTNmT2O^ ~ fZmA~ })Nmff rMmN S Or nyr N a9r<^ nSee ar0 im T,m T+r I ns n ~ r fNr ~rN~ f/S~ar anM >Tm~>9N =A0 fSmT O 019• 1n~n<~ • ~S nm f ZrNmr =~+ OOHS ~ T zmT a Nsaz c or nmz r } > ° r w> fa~>r}c zN.r-amz>z f^N>x°r= mN -Ni s~fT~sT yaN<~^~a~-c z~ a >m< : r a nm ZaT i i Tm g . Ni+ enNN ym ifTY _> miSSrN~ Z ZNmN~r Nr n ' nr.a 1 a Z aiCPm PN ss S m ~ n N N NL{Rr • OTC Y Ns o sin in v r aNin 1 n i TnO2 r n <rmi z Y i > n i N c 3 an i n zn n iz i i } T n m A n° n 1 o s n N n N i > •~ x n e n z i o e i n s i ATnapopp°:yZY>}aaf a<TOSeNaapnmreaonTn <pa j CmrAmOC Vammm>mmr<p<Cm Y <mC^N Tmif NTO>mfmrrrnfnm ~~NNMTmamf Tfs'N~TgmTmezim^n °a +m+ e^rcnr ra zmn~'z+ a-.a cnm-~c mACar sr< zNpz zrTNa rs ~ In ~fn az •+4iz az}TZam~iTO r3 iy }:TO^ v ON i ii r°^u»f<°l~rY°rs°>zrlsAnO + Z< of meT^ •fn <~J_ pn ` rn<i+ +Z nman9Tn SC S OT°>N RSS 1000•~n NinSr rf im' a3}}m9 zOm lTrmZVmZ Clm nr mmi•mm N }Npr<>zf rr c rA>e: i rNNZZ>sr> NiTaM im NW tN~rr^ r r : ma.N.a TAT Nii°r i1'NVOaNS r fA nN ~~ NSnNiTfNem NWOrNanrq%O eSn<m< re Tm `eie pr~TN r o . Tf ^m .,.. Trz ~: is o~ f^ s a^n m sr nrp e~mz Tp n~+ . T* A r~i c sx~ nm~ c Nc >'n"r F °eN N~ °r <o Tri+ iN++i: .a..m: mm Tam m T m'e n n>1 nnnNnOaanaNnuN+mN N n Nun y Oar ~ O'ONC mG .Hr N r n y x x° n izT°r yz nxn n n x z s s i isa A iAi i A i n a _ i m %m m N m T >y T t i N u. .n _ _, r. N ~w 1 C IL rWWVWWWVWWVW r VWWWWWWWW - - 1> r ar aaaaaYaeeppp}emeNp S's'p"ip}ppopfssNli L'Yri'amn .a >z ~$°a~iuu~oiii ~a<°li~°+ua•°o +s~~w°!~°e°N%°p :oo ~m.rii WU=oe ii i n p P Nr-.. Wa PONTO~`.POJJW~O~Od1•Jl+ypWWPMOJPW! rNOppII~O ~• p:INOC nmNVOnNOPImPT rOe~+Pp Op~+10r1Np-lnNON(Ojp000lCnrVwpOmO00NONwJO~JRO 3 aEi ~."•i ~.N.:'si~r i~iwe.P "'o Daryay.~~>Wia~aww.~~N~-Nw lMPNMy0iVp1 ••IN r C~N!•VrVS~ PNaJrPr N1••ypOPr~NyWO fII1 ~wNTT) SST<Y~aOr~~.•~sNs my1N~00Y1Ni •ZiTmfl l_>~ifi~}j T^yr >%aNtirM >Tin~~i NT-~IC Z)(aa >r TtinOx • ~y~Nrr>Tr YaT TfZT ZSyytiNr ji ~aZN NS wn O T DTTTTy aNNarli2ZZ2N mN ~0= ZN~>_Z]~ ~ <OerOw rTTTr 'ZTT 'i nZTyfti 2Tf yymNTim an n n) r0' m > Za f~~11nZ ZxNpyi~2 •1T Zy:i>!OZ >T TZ~>TA lira SOYr~<V O ON>pTKYTT „ 1rN<)SwTT ~~NZNNNfn i~nNnnnT ImNT>/ f 1 ~y>N eawmz ~ cmF . ~»,.. r.ro~.> m zRnT z wn r a ~N r^ r~~sb isc^tarr YrN fTr~n ~S T rNr TTTON } ~mm Zm C~ >etis n aTS c N m pfw o 'pz nS rN..N doze +~cx aaf n~ z nar s w Nzzm ^m~ m mysi N u.z..xou a fRN wNn zoo *~a ~ >ssn~ n i Z < naa iT •TII O n n n O<O AZ O a n )00> • wr tN O T > a Tn C D Y T nap D N w22 Z N .nn .ne z• . K r )mipme2yr~C~0a~0umjmCeO i*c aie.~•Ta rmoam~.>~~~•.oos ~~~ rmenrzmeo eN>T amamwamT amoa>zwos :rN>ny !>mf a. mo vxuo< nen• ~sn >nm efs>oNi n Tim .N res .xriay=zyyr~y s=~NH emTaz "o%n ~mNi n o TiNa ia+i a z~yr^ aa~ < a-~<rr- ! -• a n ^>r C erC TO T CTm> ~ Try N =N em L= ya n_ r T T ar TTT 1 n NnN nN f0 Hn n e eel nr N Ny O m Nmn Zn n2i x z >gmT a is ~_. Ni Z m N i T m w nmNN n a n n ~n Opr> W y O u TTm ~ 2 i ~ t r m w w z a a N 1 ii io i~ r1 11 u 1 1 1 I • a aZ aN o f aaII a S a ym Zm m x VWWWVW rr r rrr rVWWWW W~YW rVVWWVWwW ~aaaaaa~aa~±~~a~a`~}Y "1 "~~a+++aaa+~aaaaeaaaaa oie`+awi~.'+~oii~T miu v.W.o ae~aw~~oi~ oio ~o•~u~i`+rr+~ o P • a w JW OWPr rIN•N rNrl N rW O N N•• P PN W vONNaNTWOamaON/001n fplr aw fnmONJaNONwONO~N +~e oou eu~si~ ao o%~yo ooi.. i.o u.Mi+o t>oo~n :no ~•eas opop..~nbJaarr+pPaQoeao~oo.-W .•foooepo~no o~~+oo-. 2 C Z ~ i i n i > 9 a n r r • y • r 1 L J _ 1~ IY Im ~ 1 ~ S I ~ ~ r ~ 1 y i O 1 i a s a c i 'z ~ i m ~ M i I i i i m o i ~+ i s Im .- i a iv c e e in la N i 1 o i n i z f i N n c ii s i a x N 1 a G 1 a 2 n .i Is 1 a ID ~ i : m ~J 1 S .n S w ° P~9 V Oc'F °P ° ~PUwP< rr O P i r ^N I i eNAIWJN i . i jOUr wNryWppfPfT~rww<! f V r N I W - f Ij • • v>\Y> Trrym Pcmvgmrzi..yT ym wN nzN. c« .. »n .m. i ce r ~ c o vaz>.. a z<..orarntisx>..N \..r ° z w ~ms•rv a Ym r.. ar<•n rnmvn m . . m r Tn O20 AN ±O r D ZNTS r y O Z N L f~N•Sm a N OmO..TT Om2 ~ Sy 3 - 9 9 T r Zf \ qC ~ >M T N ZL \. On Nr m- D _ r m •y SNnw !/T C3 _ rmf yf n. ~ ~ C ~ ~ y hiN- O _ D SnNVm 2 ~ < ~ . ~ T m 3 vmY TTS ~ m 1 n m . i• NOr A +n r zy. q.. mrr cz'. S..n zr i e m m .. 2 ^ FN<y e N .Ynn ir.1T Tm~° m ^~v N 2 r .~ c i n m n TS ° 2 ~ .1 ~ rN O S 3 E n l i 1 rr T< n Y C • O O 1 ~ ~ r r f ~ e1n ° N 2 9 l n ~ D N C OH a </ n O ~ H I ~ TS 2 F n N / 2 O N m 2r f C N f O D O e D > m i Dzaavrv rrMen>>szvYV\Sr•>rr < o < t < < i w"~Onwi r •am °ai ~.'ia \ •s<°1J<°+ ° a - •• , ~ - .°+ i g~i• ~ y .. n .. . iMS~ ~ r r r r n _ < oo moL i z \'"nNin~ i i ia rira r rn rTr m iq ~ n m n z n x n s ~ i i nOmnq z x > C S <m2 +• YfOMO-nm _ z m z 1 <NmT rJT <r~wM wf\T 7 } n ~ F n n IT Nmm O nD •O m mnmNr'.IN i YrmeT • . ^~n 2 R f 1 N:< ~~ r yry Sn 2 iN 2 l[32 O T f -r m ^ ^ C w T w I(1 1s y < „ m m ~" 'i rs ~i ~ ~u N o ~ Nas a ~ ~ f ~ ~ p ei •O zms.~ as 1 f. r= m r r ~ r ]i i M N° n C i ° w P ~ en ~ : ; S i y ~ i r . b ii i ~ n ~ ~ y < n n 1 n n n i r 'A. sD ~ > ~ n zo INn ~ ~ i v ti~ ~ . z4 f a NC ~ A Aa D f m q N r W D ~ ° ~Y r- ce 2 a • ~ e PCO i Sn N 1 1 n r OrN i'[ dD O m 1 i ~ 1 n w -r - - - 1 ( C n VWW WW iaNaa'3'b'e e WWWYWWW VWW + pw+ N.Y.Y ry~ N%YY+ ai W Yo•Y' W ss k'.1 WM -1 ~ N^ P 1 ~ ~i Y 3 yryyrr "' l ii • yl.•!1!p!lwO NNNNwIINN w N w +IN a t fN N '~ W vW PW N A ~• . a weWN. =.i. ~i~iiiiW ~Q iii •• • ~ • s ~ i I S i " 1 Y o Welty! ' f i s n X10 W1 NM N.'~+fMN~ONW.~-N-N 1 O 1 T rwWrWNP~ r UfAw.'N • i0••OOry yWfWNf•Wr Or000•r~ lrTWNJO• ~ O O ~ N ! p O N O N O ) ;^ p ~ S p p S 0 OS0 P N p O O 1~ OOp1• N- OO 00 0lOlONf O 0 W P O L: 1 G °a f vneo° i o a ~ r a a + ~ D ° ~= ° a o •o• aoaaoi n .. •i~.r . .- •-++~. •o i,n ov ~ . a ~ ~~ Nwaw W•.rt<..e-.NNNUO~..nrvovnra a.-d•-v r.e +. ra-+na ~ o e=w=nNis ver TVnnr~nnnnn•.nrnnan•-n.•wa Nato ^a.>r • >`e c eeo sm>.+.xc oo >ea) ' w r ° • ~ M T GT a c e D S ng Krr r+. .. wzNS nr•. lSr r p 3Z3(i <•-w N)rn) z n i y = N ^ ^y m ^nrlPxnN»>sr OPiz Crx r- On Y20pO err .{2-~-•-04ZZ$12 CCC)nNan>T{I)el Ow0)-•[L ~ - (.)m OGOea>TTZ ^ r.T CDT Pa2P O 2~ m .TPN N ff 2y ZCO-a~yiN~a•C>~ a>rf ~ IY9 °• C ~POnaP )yy i Pi n C ~ 1 T : : 1) O 7..rNi a~nN 12rr niT~Nn.r2n OwI••O SN ^'~ >rmzo>r~mr T >.N -• xrYmN Lmrpsn O i O i <pODnp2)e. rynnnN .f2mr Z P-n1mrN y)yY~t-x n Ona~2 PDeO UPD•• rO V P ) 1 '- ° ^ F I •n O r > ~ w- n IN O O pr ns <Tnnf 2 nrr SD 1 ~ N r ° 1 a 9 . CSr) n i wr):1~• mr~ m t p s Z9-m C wr.r~r3 mr <N O~ n YS~n i i n > ezmmmT n- - zrm ro<T Ny O SOarp ni• O D i Z O z N c e °X iz im ° ) ~wi r N n ovo u e .rr z n3 2 Z N < J rN C~+ o n C 2 POrN m n n Z +9N ~ n m • nn _ Z• 2L Z n Npm r.)nmm.F rai~~mC~)Nm00=3amm rPm R'AnPTC~G~TYnmT~ +o PawTNZmr rzNr mq ~~mx >m~mYZwTxNrxmTxn Smrm¢CxNC~nN-TaCYq _ CrP-_C_ C_rNN G_>'m TmC C_•- a 2)20 O mfi0^O >r n ~ n mNj ^ nG ibz zrYrreTOrover ea- anz s Nngs~•Nmrr rr . : m rm~: : ~ N.;~:sra~ iizo"ic ~'° ~n of <<°.rar n)~r~zN s Ymnn N ri m m3m Boa i3 r£ c o~ir r^r,ENi iM T o^i xr n i ~%P T3 rar <Tx 3 N~ °T d Y r G as o yy< ~ m z nnn n nn nnnn nnnz i P nn nr. ~. c~~ u Do ocec oc D_N.D sn° i co ~~ ,fix fi. IA m3a€~ ~m~3~ 4.`~m m 3: Ia aip a sx asaa aaa p ~ nA TaN _ N _ _ n ~r rni-1 -~ -• T_T_Tm r r r ~ 3 3 3 3331 ° r JJJSSS S~$o§$aaea a.Wi=aa'1' aXiiainiy i.wi `a' DSSE6Soo,o oao-.P`a:w:.•.ea°~~>q:wN°OO as-°•waiwu~eiu°Pa°m±°W N~°o J W ru r rr W r NO r Jr aVW N rN J••PN grNPrNN NqN - i-}Oa d •ON rdWWjWWrP PWNrNWOWNI^NNJNWrrVgJJPOa ONnr?wJNT gNWrrrNOrrWaOa-110gyJNOa^rWrgN I.W 00 OwOraN-1 I~I.l OpNgWWO-•O OOOOOPO00 NN a00NW ONO OI.S gaOOaaWwraO~000POaa00000WOON~ •O V..•w IT iT i~ C i n a i I > • .°.u ny.o NOS ~on~=d.[+.C~N ! oau« ,+aocne.. `°..a oo •NSOOgNYPSN.TrP-00-up0lw}rwPNOVYa~d.i ~~NNfi . OS~SiYirOSSim2lNijrrr/}ix«rraxNnN~wiOT3T SnaOV>CV. .nan.x»00~>1~T.1zd1.rC r>ma0° v°rrym~2T arr M v « ip2ri-I~rrp`+«! YTV~w a >« ~ Tr nTm~nor -~ ezmcrarnwra..14 ma m ~ r zrm.rmr~sm .r z >wanY~ <s Tnza~eox.z~ni~zimicz.mz~«iriz ins°Tiri~°Tr a za°~-im>o ~. .sTap. r° es TnBaNn« nor o ~n dnrrrr « z>rmm .~ dm - eo-~om ~~ u p<>mTn°riti 't0 m°SO iZ rT aaNf 3^ ^~~ if n dNTZ ax3-mms> r« m~ C r .:ir•n m.a> f>iarF ia-~ mP m .'v mi ~rr~ ~^c-.xr+m«c> ep aam x a rimz z««.~.~e iTi z'zc..r. « a z... c« azn~ w.xof n. z« s is ~ o ~ zr ~ nr ~ n m ~. : 2 i « ne °cS ~ .° .- « u 1 IY ° Im ~ I 1 i ~ T i 1 a f i i m i i 1 1 faaa~ $ a a s NN afa a n f «N Z wp W n N~uxiNp .', N M a in cn ~i 3~S~~SE~SS3~S=gtS3L3#SQ~YS~Sb~ESEy.SgwSSN3 '~ i a > Is T • m r w s NuNJN NNpN N}.•IrS 8 ° pNQrP r W Np 1~ m rN VOOOO~aNryalOMdOa.Na~Jir OlA gaapa°°I IIJPU IS u OPNO°pp ~Ogp~p00pOJONN ~UeOaJONN00oolpy00! 1 OINOOOOrI000 °00°dr..aSI~N°OlOaNTOOfl lfi0 OOa 1• mYNaImW ar9rNTT\mlWai9anpwYa nff ^aNaa =~. .~m~me or ocm..ammawu mr~rmm~ Iemm t, ~1WrmSTTi e.T ~s r w irT.TTaTreT~ e:Nrz.-n~c*nw ggc dmesiNM$vp~m-zii m'~~~~i~€«i:~~i~ d z~~m~ °aSudNeTe mYedwronairc owrp.aea Nmm TNn rr mS >tif > =mria TnnNr w°r Nn0 OndT1 n n^MOI~na xrNrbg >r r., Za<fdimim mmp i'r d -. . „ nr:m ~m N..>rf : mm Namf w> ~MOd id s dYrn.+NNZ>rnam>~ a= N r zT oMi N g.. ..a mNN mrY I>r~: m NN rmr m.a pp.N r~~ n Y y a2 _ pNpTi~TTy Syr ^ ~N ° 2 a °I T N ~(C°w a'1 nlri T .Ni T C Snwa ^ p ;Om= n° NPn ~ 2 N ti N.. ~Ir €Imn "°w T ..~ n nnn« rR r~n n N n Nnnn n n _d co ~r Apr :'y° e W d idmud d r ~Sx~n • ~ z ~ m~n ~ z 8 ~nO~00VlOPnOOWCWww~Wd OVOdddRN- dpONNOIw+N !y)~IY U~NrrNrd±r ! I.. rrlWNNVlrOWPU I: i «w N I' ulw0 O"OPSMw u.p .l y.l .llm p.l .I nOr«+ON«lPpVUryOPV GCC0.11rury I. <NNJJ I1nnptMeNnN x.aaT myy~~C ~T ~• D aaf 10OTYTOCYO~OTrp»\Ty•.Nf~AT~ .~ nnTE0r1ANZT)A000CCG>nrl<2 TuC r0_'''"'llllll nnp .IY Nf~n Om)T20yrayrr FOr ~m NTrm )~Oyr i 1 J -.T TO mil Osxxiz ZZN<zeT`r D r >SaTr I P rf ry SNI rT TTTm 2 < Nny mM^•n2NmT 1 EDTirr 1 L>+anaa aaOrN2Ta in >•nrr. I ~ <,Aim ~N.r Iv)z z'>Es:>Tx>•~os n~r>oeN N r < n T yr rmo T~ T )Niarr\ m y G rmmr $ .«~~nnn ac'r~« m arm°.. zT«v i rz °s _'2i~€pTa; ~~~Nr9 s~ a> cm.ayz>c a >Fr` ~ n~TTaOi>wT`n w~m 1T0 n Cn<NmNyiTM9 n ~ D ZtiTC rDi «ONOQOOT aO \SD r> D PmxP (1 {r rAfAar mCnma Amy n it nn r mNmd T ~DN.i• e2i i2i nf==O ZNr Pn i ~ ~0N O CE _ _>Y» D 'D 1 n n2 9A i N it N O •~ u:TTT •t0 C r C 000 ~ 9 1 i n i T _ i e N nooo z zzz ` e n i o z • 9nnn z >aev <~ n NNnNrNraAaan~Tr~'.IT~NSi~~i~~: naive°ime °a m~ 1 oimTm9 imp°a w+Tir«TS` W ~TTm il>e-a>rr\.TTrTa>r i zi.i. a~T..m~jricier>E<z~vsirs::zmarix zi`~irriNic~ 9>2>2 TOEBSOT n4 Nr O>O•nE rrr •O r0 >rT j OA>r T m PTf T<: G iAN Or.• NN TEA ATE NATf5nn2n D2Mr n)~PaCm~ Owm~ O A IT OrrrNrx~ OV°mN N_r9 c9 MY2im (im»>A«Ot T NONNi9n ^ Af N 1 ~>tii 1pNNN mAf I O^ N<N '1 2' Nti T N\NiNmm~ °nN N m IA 010A ^ N ~ ~_F 111• i-NOy MnT Tn y T T >A 1 r6 T iO N a~ a2 CNy z P xsN iT " n~ yN nm~ r e O< OT \~ \r < 2 W 1 >1 E` T I • ~ N n n n Tnn nTn z nnn i O C C O 00~i Ny >M CO~iO~2 O 1 r _ i m m AT~ PP- m~T{ C A A A AAADyA tT DAA W 1 A \ m .. p . .. 1 z i ~2 ~iP r N N N u1iN MM~N p ~NN 1 O C ~!..$~{ lpa. 88-- sOfpfp +p+p SSS ~> .x. l i n N~Od-~~~~VN~OSSaSwD~N~OaO~PNEySyeS~S~SSOS 1\ f ii a ID lA VN•~ PrN P O! NP'~r r8 Nr•' ••ppNN rr yrr 1 • m ~Ogp~~OprOy~uOlWnr~~JA000JONVN•l.~~OWO~V~Op If w p p pp pp 14 pOOyJPOPrOOMNOPOtiNNNOOVOOSOOj~VlSOWSSrOPO 1~ a~x nwor..n s..o 1 • a o ^i~a...e<c 1 "' T d^ •mrsi ~ V ~Ti(l On~~ ~^~ 1f T .yT )~m T a~ )'^ 0 n 1 ° e ~a.mt~ .p~rN Si s w~ 1 s ~~ "' a^ z ~1 oi+~i e im a i ° 1 as su i.. an a y~ .- Inams ~~ s e 2 TC r rT 1 9 D m 1 N fY^0 n z a s 1 ^ ~a N^ : 1 1 a~ °n ~c i ~ 1 a mo r N ~ i ~- a..x: w...r A.. 1 f .~i T,~•~yf1~OGN m^i ~:I..s c ~~ E ' a.T~aN i n c ~ 1 ii . nas N ~a~ ' ° ' a NnN m r r 11 N r ~a~^ y ' N s +i ia s i N .- :T..:m^ 3 aia.N i T~[y..~ 1 • n n nnn a i e o ooe a y ' T ~~~ ~ ~ 1 a a aaf 1 A ^ _ a ^ N NNN _ ~ N j N ^ 1 I C ~'=r=•!LlN NJ f i ~' :..=e32~:S.3 I a .3 1 ^ ~ a : w vl a. - J~ ow Ni~= i~ m s i~i~oiii io ma iy a o so~i~.di~ego~"a 1 /0 February 19, 1987 CITE OF RANCHO CUCAlbNGA JOINT CITY COONCIL-SCHOOL DISTRICT MEETING Adj Darned Meeting An adjourned joint meeting of the City Conacil of the City of Rancho Cucsmoags and repreaentstivea from all the School Diatrice Board of Directors met on Thursday, Pabruary 19, 1987, in the Lions Yark Community linter, 9161 Base tine Road, Rancho Cucsaonga. The seating ru called to order et 7:07 p, m. by Nsyor Dennis L. Stout. Present were CounciLa.bers: Deborah N. Brain, Jeffrey Ring, Puel^ J. Wright, and ILyoz Dennis L. Stout, Also prpent vote: City Clerk, Htverly A. Anibalet; City Attorny, Jues lLzkman; Community Developent Director, Jack Lu; Community Services Director, Willis Aolly; and Ciq I~gineer, Auuell Maguire. Representing School Districts vote: Gntral School District: Toni Shiply, Debbie esker, and Pramk Cosca. Alta Lwa School District: Sandia Oarly, • Barbara Herrera, Bob Proat, sod John McMurtry. Chafty Joint Onion High School District: Birt Herein, Kathy Rinly, Jsrry Wolf, and Mike Dirkaen. Cueuonga School District: Loraine McMnllae, David Ortega, Luim Conr ales, Ren Bradahar, Julian Rincon, and Joha Costello. Etiranda School District: Dave Long and Gary Colliga. 1. HOH CAN THE CITY COUNCIL NHLR TO SOPPORT STATE LPGI SLATIVE PROGRAMS REGARD- ING SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION PINANCING7 Counc ilvomen Wright caked Mr. Dirknen to give some background on hor thn acbool• have been aligmad with the Ciq in the past to help achieve some lagio- lotion that has bean beneficial to the school diatzicL. Nr. Dirkeen Kated that school construction financing vse not the moat critical issue. He felt the more critical issue for the Hart year vas nchool eaintr Hance financing 1Ualf. The Gwernoz'• budget did not include enough to carry on the current progrus. Thy rare looking at progzm reductions. They depend on the State entirely for school financing, end there simply in not aneugh there. This map have an impact on acbool construction. It will have so impact to the eaent that they ail Lave to support acbool houairtg out of thniz general funds. Ao thy build Her schools, shy staff thm and saintain thw u an on- going expense from the general funds. This ie where the crunch comes. Thy rill not be a61e to maintain the schools ihy have. ~~ City Comeil Minutaa Febrwry 19, 1987 Pegs 2 • Ken Bradehav ateted that the $1.50 per agwre foot wee not really enough. Per baps the group could hs\re a mired push for a special tar or do some type of unified lobbying. The Mayor asked for a clarification on the tm the Stirmda School Die trier van trying to lang. John Costello responded that they rare asking for an additional fee on [op of the dwelopar'^ fe• for every house built in the cosuaity. ThaC could bring the District up Lo the level they were before December 31, 1986. Citq Attorney Markam marked that the history of the developers' fees in AB 2926 around the State is the converse of what happens in Rancho Cuemonga. He represents several cities. Virtually all the school districts in thane cities has lwied the full $1.50 for various ramms, The me racoon nanally sited is the fact that if you don't levy it, you'll never gwlity for State funding if there is ouch a thing. And if you do qualify, thq rill deduct the nowt that you did not gat from • dsvalopar that you could have. The system in Rtneho Cucmmga for dsveloper'^ fee, after the Cmdid Interpriae case, rhich ru virtually vide open. The real racoon for HIA mpporting AB 2926 vu to shut it dwm sad cap it. Pruent legislation says that is all that you em hit a de- velopment proj act rich. If clot is chat the State lagirrlatioa says, hw em a local entity rains the ta: to levy more w a davaiopaaat proj act? iihy did [heq • choose • course to do more by rty of developers' feaa. Mr. Costello stated their attorney, Clay Roller, gave them the information. They are going [o try. Mr. Dirkaen coamented that the $1.50 ran not enough. I[ probably ian'i even SOS enough. The $1.50 to match State fwding ie the problea. Whether or not ycu gwlity for State funding. What ie happening in Etiranda is simply grwth ie going to hit th® so fmt, but •t this point in tine thq have a Sough time being epprwed by the Stara for funding. So thag have to do eamathing else. Since the high school ewers ouch a vide area, they era funded on the basis of the high school attendmca area. If shay can qualify in tazma of eha number of students that era going to be theca three to air qua darn the road, (they are goal ified right nw to add m addition to Etiranda High School). The problem ie the time epm and all of the red tape for State funding, They rill have more kids Lhey em house Dafora they gat the cleaarooma built. This ie the problm they vich they could turn around. Hob T.nngman stated that if they could sot adegwtely house atudanta nw. chat ie going to happen five oz eiz yearn darn the road. Tha quality of education throughout the City is is the bbt interest of both City Council and School Boards that re push to keep additional funds coming in. Mr. Di rkeen stated that the Chaf fey District hired a conaultmt rho did a study of: • is City Comcil Minutes February 19, 1987 Page 3 (1) Coet of housing pas student. This ie hov thq dirived that the $1.50 is not enough and the $.25 for industrial/coamerical is not enough, (2) Needs of various kinds of things that go into it. School construction at high school level is sore e:pansiva then is is at junior high level For eruple. Mr. Dirkaan stated Chet Phue I is the very first •tq eo help fund the proj- ect. It provide- • vezy winisal au• of mopq. Phase II ie the fumdiag. Thin rill help pay the architect. Phase III is then you go to bid sad era rady to coaetruct. The fees of $1.50 rhich ssa being collected (in our cane .47 cents) frog the Williaa Lyoa project, is trunittsd in catching fund fros Sacraaen- to. Tha catching fords cone fzoe basds. Tha $1.50 cosec fras developers. Nwever, re do not get to keep the $1.50. Once you Gave entered that phue, thw the developer fee which ued to be the aehool diatricu sad controlled by Chas, is oo longer available. Mgor Stwt stated there is legislation being considered io el isinaq the col- lection of developer fus for flood control, strata, •tc. Re felt tMt if Chia huppeaed Chu all building rould have to stop is Rancho Cucuonga. Mr. Markaea, City Attornq, copcurrad Chet there is • backluh sad not just • against AB 2926. 1aq root to wipe out Che Quisby Mt rhich wu a aouzce of all building fee funding for parka, flood ~oatzol proj ecta. In this eoeuunity, the but thing that could happen is to nee AB 2926 disappear in its entirety sad fall back to the cu. lsr tact you era frN wdar the moviroeaental Lpact Protean to aelp azact that you needed a you calculated it. Disiricu like Chia are filling prq to Sute aavasnta. Rta ..utN_^.a c:p .Ll~u it geccrng a negative oaekluh by cifiaa there building need isn't justified. Thq ssa using it to rehab schools, fiz upMlt, roofs. Mr. Costs stated there wu Ugirlatios either posed or pending that rould pro- hibit a dis[rict frw ^toppiwg construction if the fee rare being contented. The builder could pay into as account xhatevar tae uouat xould be and the dio- trict cossld not atop constretion. ghould that 6appea toe diatricq he could see no reesoa way tats couldn't happen to the City a yell. Mayor grout zeapondad Chat re d rudy do that. We caned tc collect fees up front, nor ra collect at the sod of iht proceu or •t tine of occupancy. Mr. Taagaan stated that their Board valise that thq aunt become sot politi- cal; this is a pol iticsl issue rhich the group could addrsaa, Parhap• a repre- aencative from each group could meet together to some up xith n atatamnnt. Counciltun Kiag fe1C that [he City could help rit6 thin iuue by contacting our local legial sent. !3 City Council Minutes February 19. 1997 Page 4 2. HOW CAN CIT4 AND gCR00L DISTRICTS HORR COOpERATIYELY NHEN NEW SCHOOLS ARE BEING PLANNED AND CONSTRUCTSDY TRAFFIC, pEHICULAR, AND PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ISSUES DESIGN YACTORS JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT/PARK UgE AND DE9HLDPI~tIT POLICY deck Lsa, Comunity Davelopatnt Director, rev[ war the Design Process. Gary Collins sUtad that they hwe difficulty getting the school buses dorn the winding streets because of the type of stteeis that are being Duil t. It doesn't hove anything to do rith school sites, but [bey do Gave to transport she kids. Mr, Lam responded that these are sae of the iaaws that re weeded to knor. Mr, Long stated chat at their lent nsv school, they tried cooing to the City for ravim. But because of the dmanda baiag ands oa thm, they pulled out their plans sad vavt to the State. They •iaplq did not have the funds to do many of the things. Mr, Taaagman thadced Council for the help in the Deer Creak School traffic ac- • cea• probl ms with the perk developed sari to it, It turned out to ba s nice fncil itq and they liked hiving iha park nazt to the school. Mr. Dirksan stated that the City could alrrvs of en nn s on "s.r nv. .. .. a _- ^ the etreeta. The •tree is Geed to be ride enough for the bus to atop and turn around. Councilmen Ring asked if [hare wars nvy other practical type problm the City should be ewers of rhea zeviaring the plane ^o re can take it into considera- tion, Mr. Les stated that staff doss east with the eupeziataadavts on ^ regular beer end perhaps ra can work rith thm end cme up rith ease guidaliaea toz the fu- ture. Mr. Tnvgmen pointed out there vas a etreeC which ras being resurfaced toaor- ror. It had been posted, but the school district had not been bean notified of it. They hove three bus stops on that street. It is Lhiage like this vbere the City could coupe rata with the School Districts. Mr. Stout euggea tad that the City get a copy of the School'^ bus routes so that ve cold poet car tain etreeta as "no perking." Mr. Holley presented a report on the joint use of City and School llrk drvelop- ment. • /y City Council Hinute^ February 19, 1987 Pegs 5 • Mr. Dirkaen s4ted that rveryooe in the row bad needs that rill not fund through the St eta. The High School District needed a football field, He felt that there van a ray to fop the RDA fuoda which would be a joint effort to help then a11. Mr. Coacs atatad it ran not a concersus that [he etadiw vas the beet project. ' Mayor Stout eta[ed it ru a aline that the City fine say fine echoola, but did not rvm hive a library. Thin eight 6e awething to lode at. Mz. Ring ezprasaed thew rare a lot of grwps rho use school facilitica. He felt the reatrowa should ba left open then the echoola rera being used. Per hops the school districts could arrange to lave the reatrowa open. Sandie Oerly stated that during the last tro teaks there ware reatrowa at Carnelim School which rera left open. Swewa tried to burn tht. dorm. She did not knw hot you could leave thr open rich the vmdaliaa today. 3. STATD9 RHPORT ON CI1S, CODNT4, AtID SCHOOL DISTRICT COORDINATION OP DI SASTHR PLANS. Staff report b7 Hilliu Holly, Coa>tunity Sazvicsa Director. . Mayor Stwt atatad that a high priority rit6 the City is public safety. A eomittee hu been appointed rho rill addrea^ iaauea of Pira District, Police, and -isaeter PL inning, 6. SCHOOL PROGRAMS TO RDIIGIR 3TDDRNTS AT ALL LEpH.S ON RANCHO CDCAMONGA LOGL GOVHRNMSNT. Councilrwan Wright stated that Nx. Haaaaxran tea intareated io having an inierrelationahip rith the echoola nt the eleraotaty through high school levels. The City rss ril ling to cork rith the schools in helping to aecwplish this. It tee auggaated that each school trite down [hair ideas ea to hot this could be eccwplished. report by Hillier Hol Mayor Stout orated the iaportmce in our City is [fist ra azs • City that hu a pro6lm rhich ewething can be done about it, Ha felt thi^ City fine a chance. ~~ City Comcil Minutes Febrwry 19. 1987 Pege 6 • 6. AATOURMOSNT. Most in attendance erprereed sn iniereet in continuing this type of meeting in tha future. 1Lere being uo further diacu¢aion, Mayor Stout adjourned the teetiag at 9:20 p. a. Re¢pectfully aubaitted, Beverly A. Authelat City Glark Approved: C~ C~ ~G • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: ADril 15, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Magutre, City Engineer BY; Linda Beek, Engineering Technician ~ ~~u ~~. ~,. z~_~ ~' i f ~ z y tn" Sl1BJECi: Approval of a Subordination Agreement with Lincoln Rancho Cucanonga Associates, a California Partnership, located on the northwest corner of Eighth Street and Rochester Avenue RECi)NENp17I01: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the subject Subordination Agreement and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same. Background/An atysis the City Council approved a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreenent for Parcel MdD 8648 on October 4, 1984, submitted by Lincoln Rancho Cucamonga Associates. In order to secure financing for this proJec t, the lender requires that the Lten Agreenent be subordinated to Liens in favor of the lender. Lincoln Rancho Cucamonga Associates has submitted a Subordination Agreement for City Council approval. Copies of said agreement are avaflable in the City Clerk's office. °. °5 ^:ctfulh euianiccetl, r RHM:LB:dlw ~7 • SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT NOTICE: TNIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT RESULTS IN YOUR SECURITY INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY BECOMING SVBJECT TO AND LOWER PRIORITY THAN THE LIEN OF SOME OTHER OR LATER SECURITY INSTRUMENT. THIS AGREEMENT, made this .j/L... day of ~/~"~, 1987, by LINCOLN RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSOCIATES, a CsliEOCnia pan ne rship, owner of the land hereinafter described and hereinafter referred to as "Owner" and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, hereinafter referred to as "City," owner and holder of the certain Real Property and Lien Agreement hereinafter referred to as "Lien Ag ceement." W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement dated October 4, 1984 ("Improvement Contract") covering that certain teal property described in the Improvement Contract as follows: That land situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of Ssn Bernardino, State of California, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 30 of the Map of Rochester pee Book 9, page 20 of Maps, records of said County; Thence along the north line of said Lot 30 Nacth 89° 43' 21" Eaat 1297.34 feet to the Northeast corner of said lot 30; Thence along the easterly line of Lot 30 and Lot 31, o£ said Map of Rochester South 0° 24' OS" West 766.13 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot 31; Thence along the southerly line of said Lot 31 South 88° 09' S6" West 1298.63 Eeet to the Southwest corner of said Lot ]1; Thence aLo ng Che westerly line of acid Lot 31 and said Lot 30 North a' 25' 46" East 800.61 Peer to the Northwest corner of said Lot 30 and the Point of Beginning. 0152Y/L°.061-078 sb 1:04/02/87 /8 Ezcepting the ref com the east 20 feet of said lots as shown on deed recorded on September 25, 198a as Document No. 84-230034, County of San Bernardino, State of California. to secure the construction of Off-site Street improvements which were recorded October 25, 1984 in the Official Records of San Bernardino County, State of California; and WHEREAS, Owner has ezecuted a deed of trust and note in the sum of Three Million One Hund[ed Thousand Dollars (S3,i00,000) dated March 19, 1987, in favor of InterFirst Bank Dallas, N.A., hereinafter referred [o as 'Lender,' payable with interest and upon the terms and conditions described therein; and WHEREAS, it is a condition precedent to making said loan that said deed of trust last above mentioned shall, upon recordation of this Agreement, unconditionally be and remain at all times thereafter a lien o[ charge upon [he land hereinbeEore described, prior and superior to the lien or charge of the Lien Agreement; and WHEREAS, Lender is willing to make said Loan provided the deed of trust securing the same shall.¢eeome a lien or charge upon the above-described property prior to~and superior to Che lien or chacge of the Lien Agreement and provided that City will specifically and unconditionally subordinate the lien or charge of the Lien Agreement to the lien or charge of the deed of trust in favor of Lender; and NOW, THEREFORE, in nnn.i~.a.ic- -f [G2 wuLUei oene[rts acccucnq to the parties hereto and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which consideration is hereby acknowledged, and in order to induce Lender to make the loan above referred to, it is hereby declared, understood and agreed as follows: (1) That said deed of trust securing said note in favor of Lende[ and any renewals or extensions thereof, shall, upon recordation of this Agreement, unconditionally be and remain at all times thereafter a lien or charge on the property therein described prior and superio[ to the lien or charge of the Lien Agreement. (2) ThaC Le ndec would not make its loan above described if it were not contemplated that this subcrd.nation agreement were to be executed and recorded as se[ forth herein. (3) That this Agreement shall be the whole and only agreement with regard to the subordination of the lien or chacge • -2- ~5 • of the Lien Agreement to the lien or charge of the deed of trust in favor of Lender above referred to and shall supersede and cancel, Dut only insofar as would affect the prioci[y between the deed of trust and Lien Agreement, any prior agreements as to such subordination, other than those pcovisions, if any, contained in the Lien Agreement which provide for the subordination of the lien or charge thereof to another deed or deeds of trust or to another moctgage or mortgages, pursuant to which this Agreement is entered into. The City declares, agrees and acknoa ledges that: (a) It intentionally and unconditionally waives, relinquishes and subordinates the lien oc charge of the Lien Agreement in favor of Che lien or charge upon said land of the deed of trust in favor of Lender above referred to and understands that in reliance upon, and in consideration of this waiver, relinquishment and subordination specific loans and advances are being and will be made and as a part and parcel thereof, specific monetary and other obligations ate being ana will be entered into which would not be made or entered into but for said reliance upon this waiver, relinquishment and subordination; and (b) Concurrently with the ezecution of this Agreement, • an endorsement shall be placed upon the Lien Agreement that said Lien Agreement has by this instrument been subordinated to the lien or charge of the deed of trust in favor of Lender above referred to. NOTICE: THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT CONTAINS A PROVISION WHICH ALLOWS THE PERSON OBLIGATED ON YOUR REAL PROPERTY SECURITY TO OBTAIN A LOAN, A PORTION OF WHICH MAY BE EXPENDED FOR PURPOSES OTHER THAN IMPROVEMENT OF THE LAND. DA Ea LINCOLN RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSOCIATES, a California pactners hip By: Lincoln Property Company No. 611, a Calif n a limited partnership , [rk M. Hansen General Partner (S ICiNATURES CONTINUED) 3- DATE CITY CLERK. ALL SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED _ti_ C~ r~ L ~~ • STATE OD CALIFORNIA ) es. COUNTY OP ORJ1)A08 ) On this }`_ day of ~~~ 1987, before se, the undersigned, • notary public in and !or said County end State, personally appeared BRIR M. HANSBN, known !o se or proved to se on the basis o! satlsfaetory widsncs to be the person who exeeutad the within inatrusen! as a genersi partner of Lincoln Property Caapany M611, s California lisited partnership, the gsnsrsl partner of Lincoln Rancho Cueaaongs Associates, s California lisited partnership, end acknowledged to ae that he executed the within lnstrusent as a genarsl partner oL the first partnership shove nosed which executed the within instrusent ae general partner of the last partnership nosed. MITNBSS ay bend and official sesl the day end year first herelnabove written. Y '~ - ~ ~~ .+ j AIL/d~ _~~'li!/ .9r /~~ -~-! No ary public in and for • ~.. . _. '.. .. _. ~ P the County o! Orange _"`-"°" Stets of giifarnis ~ ~ 3fIN3Atl H31S3H]OH Q= W W C f N r ti W Y i z 0 d 0 U O x • 0 a • ~3 • RESOLUTI01 N0. ~r/-~69 A RESOLUTIQI OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ff RANCHO CUC4MOti0A, APPROVING A SUBORDINATiQI AGREEI£NT FROM LINCOLN RANCHO CUCAMCNGA ASSOCIATES, A CALIFORNUI PARTNERSHIP AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO Siq SAlE ' NHEREAS, a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the installation of off-site street Improvements including but not Limited to curb, gutter, and asphalt pavement along Jersey Boulevard was aDProved by City Council on October 4, 1984 and recorded in San Bernardino County on October 25, 1984, instrument No. 84-256114; and NHEREAS, for the developer to secure financing for the protect, the lender requires that the above-mentioned lien be subordinate to the lien in favor of the lender; and VHEREAS, the developer has submitted a Subordinate Agreement to that effect for the CTty's approval and execution. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Ctty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Subordinate Agreement be and the same • are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Subordination Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk attest thereto. ~~ /~~ ~ fC J ~y ...................................... ,L~`'~~k- STAFF REPORT ~~~~. :> \_ DATE: ADrfl 15, 1987 = ~'- ~ i T0: City Council and City Manager > iasc FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Michael D. Long, Sr. Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Award Professional Service Agreement for construction Surveying for the Construction of Master Plan Storm Drains 4-N, 4-P and 4-0 (Assessment District 86-2) to J.P. Kapp and Associates, Incorporated for the amount of E6,622.00 to be funded from Revenue Assessments. Funding is contingent on Bond sales. i RECOMIENCATIOI: It is recommended that City Council Award the Professional Service Agreenent for construction surveying for the construction of Master Plan Storm Drains 4~1, 4-P d 4-0 (Assessment 0lstrict B6-2) and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend (6,622.00, (56,020.00 plus 10% contigency) to be funded fran Revenue Assessments: • Background/Analysis Staff sought and received proposals for construction surveying of said protect. J.P. KaDP & Associates has been selected for said services. Respe 1 su~mitte~d, ..~c.~~ RHM:ML• ~~ • ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86-2 MASTER PLAN STORM GRAINS 4a1, 4-P AND 4-0 CONSULTING SERVICES PROPOSAL SUMMARY CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING L. D. King, Inc. Inc. Hackett and Kramer, Inc. 0erbish, Guerra and Associates, Inc. Dwight French and Associates Janes M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, inc. Associated Engineers J. P. Kapp and Associates, Inc. f 6,000.00 5 7,750.00 524,500.00 S 8,490.00 f 2,560.00 511,000.00 S 6,020.00 ~L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: April 15, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell M. Maguire, City Engfneer BT: Michael D. Long, Sr. Public Morks Inspector ., ~'M7~ t~'r. a~~ z ~I" ~ 19" SUBJECT: Award Professional Service Agreement for construction administration and inspection for the Construction of Master Plan Storm Drain 4-N, 4-P and 4-0 (Assessment District 86-2) to Don Greek and Associates for the amount of (57,739.00 to Oe funded from Revenue Assessments. Funding is contingent on Rond sales. RECOMIF31a1TI011: It is recommended that City Council Award the Professional Service Agreement for contract administration and inspection of the documents for the Construction of Master Plan Storm Drains 4~1, 4-P 6 4-0 (Assessment District 86-2), and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend (57,734.00, (S 52,490.00 plus 10X contigency) to be funded from Revenue Assessments. • Background/Analysis Staff sought and received proposals for contract adninistration and inspection of subject Droiect. Don Greek and Associates has been selected for said services. Res pe mi tted, RHM: ML. ~ 7 r 1 LJ ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86-2 CONSTRUCTIQI OF M45TER PLAN STORM GRAIN 4-N, 4_p AND 4-0 CONSULTING SERVICES PROPOSAL SUMMARY CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND INSPECTIDt L 0. King, Inc. Milidan Associates NBS/Cowry C.G. Engineering J. F. Davidson Associates, tnc. C. I. A. Engineering Consultants Dwight French and pssoctates James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc Don Greek and Associates 545,880.00 533,500.00 f48,224.00 No total given (21,380.00 f33,745.00 519,520.00 f33,300.00 (52,940.00 ~~ C~ -- ~ ,,.,,.,,o~ STAFF REPORT ~~' ~. ~~~~' 04TE: April 15, 1981 ~~ _'' 6 z T0: City Council and City Manager 19" FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Michael D. Long, Sr. Public Morks Inspector SUBJECT: Aaard Professional Service Agremment for Soils and Materials Testing for the Construction of Master Plan SLOrm Drains 4a1, 4-P and 4A. (Assessment District 86-2) to Pioneer Consultants for the anount of 52,888.00 to be funded from Revenue Assessments. Funding is cronttngent on Bone sales. RE001~EIIdITI01: It Ts recommended that City Council Award Professional Service Agreement for Soils and Materials Testing for the Construction of Master Storm Drains 4a1, 4-P L 4-0 (Assessment 0lstrict 86-2) and autlariu the Administrative Services Director to expend (2,888,00, (52,625.00 plus 10,C contigency) to be funded from Revenue Assessments. Background/Analysis Staff sought and received proposals for soils and materials testing of su b~ect protect. Pioneer Consultants has been selected for said ResDp ly sudnftted, ~..J a9 • ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86-2 CONSTRUCTION OF MASTER PLAN STORM DRAINS 4-N, 4-P, AND 4-0 CONSULTING SERVICES PROPOSAL SUMM4RY SOILS AND MITERIALS TESTING C. H. J. Inc. f2,210.00 Richard Mills Associates f1, 354.00 Pioneer Consultants f2,625.00 John R. Byer1Y. Inc. f6, 600.00 !~J 30 :a ... ...... a.v~ STAFF REPORT GATE: April 15, 19W T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Diane N. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer VIIA.N(~yf ..y f ,. <~..'~ > x; ~- 6 z ~o-- ~ SUB,IELT: Approval of Contract Change Order No. 1 for the preparation of plans. specifications and estimates for the Area Y!I Stan Drain, contract workings with 6.P.f. Consulting Civil Engineers 1n the amount of (5,500.00 whicA is within the lOf contingency Dringing the contract total to f60,820.00 to be funded 6y Drainage Funds L RECOI~EIOATION: The Contract Change Order in the amount of (5,500.00, which is within the pre-approved contingency aaount, is recommended for acceptance by Council and to be signed by the Mayor upon Council approval. Two work iteas arc noted M thin the Chance Order as di«uccM ny attached letters. The first consldlrs the eztenslon of the Turner Avenue laterai to the north of the Arrow Route intersection. The effect of this change allows for nuisance waters to be picked up before crossing the Arrow-Turner intersection. Th1s has a zrior advantage in eliminating the need for cross gutters within the noted intersection. The second item allows far the design of the mainline stone drain to proceed through the NorthTown Park s1te. An ultimate construction savings by this change in the designs is estimated at about f90,000.00. Re'/sp~"e~ctfully submitted, ~i J ;~~ RHM:BWF:k~ %~i'%~~i.~/~~'.Oa~jt~ Attachments .~/ cm aF RANCHO cucA-nNGa ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER . r er o.: Engineering ?ions, Specifications and Engineer's Estimate for the Construction of the Drainage Area VII Storm Drain March 16, 1987 ~- T0: G.P.S. Consulting Engineers ngrneer You are hereby requested to comply wtth the following changes from the agreement for engineering services. in Contract Price In Contract Price 1. Additional fee as required by the extension of storm drain along Turner Avenue to north side of Arrow Route. (See attached letter f2, 300.00 of 3/9/87.) 2. Additional fee to change to Alignment "A° per letter of 2/17/87 attached. f3, 200.00 • TOTAL f5,500.00 Item 1 to eliminate need for cross gutters at the Arrow Route intersection. Item 2 to follow a more economic alignment for the storm Aratn eyerw", The amount of the Contract will be (YfRr`f/{!A) (Increased) by the Sum of: Five Thousand Five Hundred and W/100 Dollars (f 5,500.00 +T` The Contract Total including this and previous Change Orders will be: Sixt Thousand Eight Hundred and Twenty and 00/100 Dollars (f 60,8'LO:IIO~ The Contract period provided for completion will 6e (Fdtrbdll0)(Ddttdbdld) (Unchanged) Days Thfs document will became a supplement to the Contract and all provisions will apply hereto. f" ~~ ' r // ~ i< <~ ~ oequested: ..~/ ~/~~,.r,.~v--t-_~.s~ i`Srl~ i us a neer a~ 6 Accepted: ~ 3//98 T ' ngine r "-lTate `~ Approved; Amount Within 10`b Contingency _ _ ~i5yor, C y o anc o "ucamonga a e rs n oraa on us as recor o any c anges or g na eng neer ng agree~ent dated: February 5, 1987 - C.0. B 87-14 3~ consulting civil engineers February 17, 1981 Nr. B1 ane Frandsen Senior Civil Engineer Engineering Division Community Development Oe partment City of Rancho Cucamonga ' P.O. Box 801 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Reference: Pro3ect 87-002 Drainage Area YII Storm Drain Dear Blane: 17821 E. 17[h. Street Sui[e 295 Tustin, California 92680 (714)832-4707 The addition design fee for using Rlignment 'R' is 53,200,00. This includes the additional survey, borings and storm drain design. Should you have any questtons please call me. Sincerely, a ls~~[-/ Norman K. Spielman N KS :1 kb • • • 33 • consulting civil engineers March 9, 1987 17821 E. 17th. Street Suite 295 Tustin, California 92680 (714)832-1707 RECEIVED MAR 11 1987 art a a~cla cucu4oau Dtr~xflRiac avlslox • Mr. Slane Frandsen Senior Civil engineer Engineering Division Communi[y Developtaant Department City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Reference: Project 87-002 Drainage Area V22 Storm Drain Dear Blnne: Our firm i^ recommending that the Tu cnec Avenue Lateral be extended from a ootnr r~D.,,.i.i..es_^ fi.c h~ndr' southererly of Arrow Route to Arrow Route. Theureason for this recommendation Sa that fifty-four cubic feet per second (54 efa) is tabled to Arrow Route at Turner Avenue. Without a storm available at Arrow Route, this amount of storm water would cause intersection flooding of a major highway.* As a result of this extension, additional survey and storm drain design is required. The additional fee for this work is 52,300.00. * Attached to this letter is a coat analysis comparing several alternatives to provide drainage [elief for this intersection. 3Y Mr. Blane Frandsen Re: Drainage Area VII March 9, 1987 Page 2 A summary of present contract costs is as follows: 1, Original Contract Amount = S55,320.00 2. Additional fee as a result of 3,200.00 changing from Alignment 'B' to Alignment 'A' (per letter dated 2/17/87) 3. Additional fee for the Turnec 2,300.00 Avenue Lateral extension (Per this letter) TOTAL 560.820.00 Please note the total fee is within the P.O. 100485.0 limitation. ($60.852.00). If you have any questions, please call. Sri/fin/jcJere y, Noe Torkelso~~ • RT:lkb C~ 3 ~" • • COST ANai.ySZC FOR DFaINACF` AF I F FOR THE TORNER AV£NUF/AaaON AI NLav I6 RcLF`(`m Tn,y Altern No 1 From Turner Avenue/AC[Ow Route Intersection in Arrow Route easterly to Deer Creek Channel. Pipe Size = 45" Q = 54 cfs ' Length = 800' 45" R.C.P. 800 L.F. 135.00/L.F. 108,000 Channel Connection @ Deer Creek L,S. 10,000 $118,000 Alternat No Extend Turnec Avenue Lateral from a point approximately 550' south of Arrow Aoute to Arrcw Route. L 550' p 54 cfs 30• = R.C.P. 500 L.F. 105/L.P. 57,750 Add Alternate No. 1 savings on 14,900 reduction of Mainline Size•in Turnec Avenue 5102,650 Before After 36" 24" 39w 30" 39" 30" 39" 33" (Pipe size reductions in Turner Ave. due to reducing Q by 54 cfs) Length Savings/L.F. Savinas 940 115 - 90 25.00 23,500 400 125 - 105 = 20.00 8,000 370 125 - 105 : 20.00 7,400 400 125 - 110 = 15.00 6,000 Total Savings $44,900 The above analysis is based on the following assumptions: 1. The beginning point for cost comparison begins at the same point in Turner Avenue. That point bein located approximately 550' (feet) south of Arrow Highway.9 2. The miscellaneous structure coats will remain constant for the alternates. 36 The alternate of constructing a storm drain in Arrow Highway from Turner Avenue t0 the mainline system f0[ Drainage Area VII was not evaluated in detail for the following reasons: . 1. The reach of this alternate is longer than the reach of Alternate No. 2 (950' vs 550'), 2. The pipe size will be 36" R.C.P. for this alternate verses 30" R.C.P, for the Turner Avenue extension. 3. Up-sizing of the mainline would be required from Arrow Highway to the railroad; thus, adding additional costs. Based upon the above findings, it is our recommendation to extend the Turner Avenue system from a point approximately S50' south of Arrow eighway to Arrow Highway. • • 37 RESOLUTION N0. ~'7 - ~ 7~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON6A, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER N0. 1 TO C.O. N 87-14, A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR THE PREPARATION OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES FOR TIE AREA YII STORM DRAIN NHEREAS, the C1ty Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga has previously engaged G.P.S. Consulting Civil Engineers by a Professional Services Agreement (C.O. 87-14) for Drcparation of Plans, Specifications and Estimates for the Area Y[I Storm Orain; and NHEREAS, additional workings arc desired to be performed for Contract Change Order No. 1 dated March 16, 1987 and as G.P.S. Consulting Civil Engineers is willing to perform wch additional workings for a fee. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, to accept and execute the attached 'Engineering Services Contract Change Order' to C.O. 87-14 in the mount of (5,500.00 to bring the topl contract amount W 560,820.00. Such Change Order amount is within the ortglnai project contingency approved by Council on February 5, 1967. f~.J 38 ---- C[TT GF RAVCHG CCCAMO~GA i a~i, tr • STAFF REPORT =~`j ~-, s ~~:«_. = _tL DATE: April 15, 1981 -__ _ _ . }: :. i ~~ T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer j BY: Biane W. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer ~ SUBJECT: Approvai of Contract Change Order No. 1 for the preparation of a Computerized Standard Specification System by Norris- Repke, Inc. in the amount of f7,300, bringing the total contract amount to f17,700.00 to be paid from Systems Development Funds RECDMMEIOATIOM• The Contract Change Order No. 1 in the amount of f7,300.00 is recommended for acceptance and execution. Additional fund allocation to be approved for completion of the contract. This will bring the • contract total being expended from Systems Development Funds to f17,700.00. BACKfROUMD/AWILYfIf: Thn croNil ~aH nn ...n ,..a .._ _....a _. r~p~•-••~~~ p~.,~JGay Ci teu w ix a irybred specification package, based upon bid item notation. This has been reconsidered by staff requesting a specification package based on total conformance to the "Standard Specifications" as published by the j American Pubttc Works Association. The move is progressive in aspect. i The change requires a revamping of the scope of work to be performed by the Consultant. A letter detailing the change is attached to the Change Order form. Respe y b fitted, r RHM BWF:ko r Attachmerts st J ~9 • ~1 NORRIS-REPKE, INC. I ~ SO7 E FIRST Sr E~i"E A . rti5-~~,~. CAUF'-anaA ?259C [7 ^ ~; r3^.-_ _ ' --e<~_ • -__ _e~ _ .,' - _.: :_ -''a "G7? ~ .uC r'6 3^v r2?5 fc: --:..,___..,: o° `~7= -_..z?c __, cai Jn s~s.e^. .; aas=_„ ., ... __rsta^:tl_n..^., your .=_vis=e`ci:__,_.,:, o=. our ore~ious c_>>~s__ons. ~w~ _` ~_ ..~PK r. ~__., L3Cla~ __.. ^.ys _- .__s. .?vis_.. .,.._c Ucn d~C a?ve_c.. .. _ _.. SS]Oe ..: .. ,,:k, _. ___ -.-_o,s__. ,, _, _ra: ,., ___icrs/Stanad:.. JCCC-?~ s '?vi?.: 3~^. .__., '_ r?Vi5iJn5 LO Vn" '~ ^ _ _ " _. ,__., ~^,renc :evisi rs n ~____:v 3-] c ~-_ _- _ ^:s~tc sic :s. ^iy 'e ii si ^s, Oe.__ ors daaiL - .. -_ -~te Tdoie of Cenie^CS. ~. __= Cara oecia: Provis.c._ -~~.,: std:^ca: soec:d: ,vi_ ^s ... :_,.:ion_. .. .•iL .- SeJ3raL? 5J2Jia.S, _: ~3: _5 c .. _ ~. _„ ~.:4. v~ ~~ ~ ~ _ _ __~_. 35 ~. _ v_ __..: 3~__. ..5 _ __~___ 35 ~. Cy^^1'151 CC'1 `_: dCC. ___~ "2J:5'_^_ '__: d:0 35 f31!0'.v5: _.. _5:_ ____..~. ~__~Ld1J^.5 . ______..~ r:___ _,,.. __.__ ______ l • ~ll'i~sG -~ ~16~'fCE y/ cITT of RilNCNO cuca-nNGA ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER . r er No.: _ _ _; _ a ngineer You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the agreement for engineering services. in Contract Price In Contract Price ~~___ '-.y_3_ The amount of the Contract will be (Decreased) (Increased) by the sum of: ~~ - Dollars (S'~'~-.== ----~- The Contract Total including this and previous Change Orders will be: - - -- ,a:-c =even - =r. Dollars (S '' ' The Contract period provided for complett on will be (Increased )60ecreased) t@nMangeb) Days This document will bec!//,/ent to the Contract and all provisions will aDD1Y hereto. Y ~. Requested: ~ -f-~-'i`"! '~ -~iusse e, C'{~~ng~neer a e Accepted: ~~~(~/[Fn inee ' LF 3-2 a eb7 9 :~ Approved: ayar, ity o anc o ucamonga a e s n once on us as recor o anY c anges or g na eng neering agree~ent dated: /i~gK,f 7•iv9F~ C.o S6•tir ~2. RESOLUTION N0. ~ 7 -~ ~~ r L C A RESOLUTION OF 7HE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROYING CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER ND. I TO C.O. 86-81, A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREE4ffNT FOR THE PREPAMTION OF A COMPUTERIZED SPECIFICATION SYSTEM WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of 0.ancho Cucamonga has previously engaged the services of Norris-Repke, Inc. by a Professional Services Agreement (C.O. 86-81) for the preparation of a Computerized Specification System; and NHEREAS, the City now desire to change the scope and direction of the workings and whereas Norris-Repke, Inc. is in agreement to such changes in scope and direction in the pro,l ect and agrees to perform the additional work for a fee. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, to accept "Engineering Services Contract Lhange Order No. 1" to of f7, 300.00 and to reallocate funds from the Systems a total contract aawunt of f17,700.00. and execute the attached C.O. 86-81 in the amount Development Fund to pay ~3 • --- CIT1' OF RAtiCHO CCCAy[O\GA `~i ~•,r,,tr STAFF REPORT ~' j '~_ s df .,_ _ ~:t:: - _ `r~ . DATE: April 15, 1987 - -- _ -~ 'p,-- i T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer SU&JECT: Approval of Agreement for Installation of Dublic improvement and Dedication between Jerrold E. Ewing and Sieglinde R. EMng and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements at 8570 and 8576 Arrow Route tt is recaiwended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Agreement for Installation of Public improvement and Dedication between Jerrold E. Ewing and Sieglinde R. Ewing and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKAt W IIO/AMIILYSIS: The attached subject Agreement between the City and Jerrold E. Ewing and Sieglinde 0.. Ewing provides for street improvements which include curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drive aooroaches. street tTnwra awn «roo. ~ _„c-t; along the Ewing's Arrow Route Frontage. The Ewings have agreedrto grant to the City a Roadway Easement to allow for the widening and improvement of Arrow Route Tn return for the construction of said improvements. SaT4 street improvements wilt be constructed in con3unction with the Ctty's Baker Avenue and Arrow Route Storm Drain and Street Improvement Project. Respe .y u matted, ' r R :LEH:ko Attachments yy i AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC 1wR0YEMENr AID DEDICATION This Agreement is made and entered into this day of 1987 Dy and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY") and Jerrold E. Ewing and Sieglinde R. Ewing, husband and wife, as ,iotnt tenants (hereinafter referred to as "ONNER") for the installation of certain public improvements including, but not limited to curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drive approaches, street sights and street pavements along a portion of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue 1n the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A. Recitals (i) CITY has prepared plans and specifications far, and presently • contemplates Lhe installation of, public improvements along Arrow Route from the Cucamonga Creek Channai to 1930' west of Baker Avenue and Baker Avenue frs, oGi ;1.reei w toornut tloulevard (the "Baker-Arrow Protect" hereinafter in this Agreement). (ii) ONNER owns that certain real properties, identified as San Bernardino County Assessors Parcel No. 207-201-27 and 207-201-28, fronting along Arrow Route which property 15 within the itm/ts of the Baker-Arrow Pra,ject and described as foilows: APN 207-201-27; The East 71.64 feet of the Nest 469.68 feet of the Nest 1/2 of the South 1/2 of Lot IS of the Cucamonga Fruit Lands, Section 9, Township 1 South, Range 7 Nest, as measured to the street centerline. APN 207-201-28; The East 60 feet of the West 529.68 feet of the West 1/2 of the South 1/2 of Lot 15 of the Cucamonga Fruit Lands, Section 9, Township 1 South, Range 7 West as measured to the street centerline. -1- y~ (iii) OWNER desires to participate in the Baker-Arrow Project so as to dedicate necessary Rights-of-Way related to street frontage improvements along. owners property at 8570 Arrow Route and 8576 Arrow Route ("the Ewing Portion" hereinafter). CITY is willing to include the Ewing Portion within the Baker- Arrow Project upon the terns and condT Lions hereinafter set forth. NON TMEREfORE, 1t is agreed Dy and between CITY and OWNER as follows: 1. OWNER shall execute a Deed of Easement in favor of CITY for street right-of-way and related purposes in fore and content identical to that attached hereto as Exhibit "A". 2. CITY is authorized to cause OWNER's Deed of Easement to be recorded forthrith upon execution of tR1s Agreement. 3. CITY shall include the Ewing Portlon as a part of the construction of the Baker-Arrow Project and shad cause all necessary public improvements to De installed in accordance with CITY's plans and specifications therefor. 4. ONNER agrees to grant to CITY, Its elected officials, officers, • agents, employees and contractors such rights of entry and/or temporary Cmo 1, ut ii un easemenu as are deemed necessary by CITY's City Engineer to cause the completion of the Ewing PortTOn. 5. This Agreement shall De governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 6. In the event any legal proceeding 15 instituted to enforce any terms or provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shad be entitled t0 recover attorneys' fees and costs from the other party in an amount determined by the Court to be reasonable. 7. This Agreement Ts binding upon and shall inure to the benefits of the parties hereto and to their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, wherever the context reQUires or admits. • -2- yC r1 U 8. It is undersWOd that the intent of this Agreement is not to relieve the responsibilities of the owners for the suD~ect parcel(s) with regards to the normal and usual public improvements conditioned ar required as a part of land development or redevelopment. Improvements would include streets, sidewalks, street lights, utility undergrounding, street landscaping, etc. 9. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, whether oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, stateaKnt or promise not contained in this Agreement shall 6e valid or binding. Any nadificattan of this Agreement shall be effective only tf tt is 1n writing signed by all of the parties hereto. tN NITNE55 MIEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. CITY PROPERTY Of~JI CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation By: enn s u , yor _ ~ wo-i~ ~ ~a..,4~ ~ erro w ng T/ sY. e9 n e w ng ATTEST: every u e , y er 3- MPROVED AS TO FORM: y arney X17 H*+###r*ht*rrHrr;rrtrrrril#t*ytir*rrt#trM*ft*tr##irr##rrrtrxfie*ftrw wrw#+eee STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO • On 19 before me the un ersJgne otary u c, persona y appeare an L A, AUTHELET personally known t0 De LO be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, and known to me to be the parsons who executed the within instrument on beAaif of said municipal corporation, and acknowledged to me that such municipal corporation executed it. NITNESS MY HANK ANO OFFICIAL SEAL o ary gna ure STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO j ss On this the ~/L1 day, of 4.--.'/ ~~,p~-± before the um3ersigne o~ary u c persona y appeare -~~ ( ^ personally known to me , ~, Pr.,Y^.: t^, P:` Qn #w. haste of exit efarinrv ovl Aan[e tD De the Der50n(5} whose name(s) suDscribed~ to the wt thin instrument and acknowledged tha executed tt, NI7NESS MY HAND AN ~. ..~. / '.~ ~~.. , ,1 ~ ~ JUDITeut aGUF]RNV1 o ary gna re :^,-ew o~ a.-.,.-. _,~.. ~~-"' MT cumin. a m . i9a 1.°"~C;. . $E AL ~ CFF{r_,q_ is JUC - ' SAM°"A y .7„T+ A F^r _. NC tPGY m: G..:~~l'~+~N'4 ~ _fl N^^~.r _ vx eEmunovro counn sw etaruncivo c;,+ . M coan ~~ Na m, (9a7 ~ t~~ Mt amm. unrtet 4e M. I?9] ACKNOkL 6E~ p~CNSENOT~ALCEPTABLE.BYAACORPOMRT ON/PARTNERSHIP ACKNONLEOGEMENT -4- I'~ U '/P V. LI ~ ~ _4 ail V`' _.o 1_ SCGCE HaR/z. / =40' 13 14 EV1ltNG 15 '` PLAN SCALE ~-`•, /"'GO' 207-20/-27 I - ~, ,,m S 207-20/-OG a~' k Y '~i 207-20/-28 I T 207-20/-03 207.20/-OQ •. ti III Q ,, +la `y ~3 p'~ t,~ n 0 ~, p p _C'4 f T C ~~. tai Q ~ ~ ~= P' l ~ ~ yi - ~- p v, ..o/N ~' Oi _~~ ~. /O i~ I ,~ /_ I VII r .. ~~ ~ T ., b - T ~ ~ . i9 N // / A .u ~1 :. -_ _ r.. _ -;.. __ 1 'drily ~~ne8 ~ ~~ 207- Zo'i-07 ~`.'I ROUTE y9 Ri00pii1R RIpYrTN w • CL, M.YkAR CbClO~i .dr RROOIOO 6tK m C#f o! ~an[do QuamoRY P.O. BI•.t ~RpeAC t"+,:,teoWR, G 91710 ~AL~AiOYi TIRE AiN p011 Ri00110~1'/IIA EASEMENT ro~ w v,~.uMI.E tronstne2lnno(9, IRtflPt w which a ApHhy ptksow4dilA, ~Ierrnld E FYi nO mn chat loo F„1n0_ Auehpnn . un.. Im.r OMM!$) b th f7tf A# ^Ytb OIeRSDRp, R 511midpRl Ca7bnnm, tl P.~9Wf6N[ (a Po6d Purgses 10. tn~tm0 yaR tr twTliiR rat PTDOw1/ r W ClYatll~rbCYlesDyR, CdIRR1d7~ MerAYo.lw o! 9dl6yrili, DflolNd r Po1wN '[hp mI[h 20.00 bK o[ ebp pwth 50.00 twe wnwd pt HRAC pvpL of the Yo[ 60.00 [ut a! eM tollowloi duerthpd pragrry: A grtlep o[ Mw wpe I/I o[ eM pmeh I/2 0( Oat l5, Necfoo 9, towpAlp t .oath, ipRN 7 wpt, 9po Nrurdlee Nu pW lNrtdle, pecerdly m tM Mu of G:tppl0nip L.W. u qr r0 reeordW Lo Nok 4 of Mppp, [pit 9, r¢ordp of Sae Nrwprdlo Gucy, dpperlNd a follow: igdaolni pc • glut q cM pw[A IlAp o[ u!d 7.ot LS, p dLUaM of 798.Ot (ue put of cM panthwut eorwr of old lot; eMRep por[A 7]0.91, ehmce uK 17651; eApKp pooch 130.91 fwt; ebuep vot 1IL6/ [ot to eM q/oe o[ nylmlpi. I11p •ru pod dbnaeu of :M phorp dpperthpd property pn eowpi ted cn ehe nuten of the pd blmn_ .. ._ _.. ....... ......u up. •~- V slpb o14l//rDmt._ 1 l-t'{77/ ~ _ ro~Mrmt mp, on muiM~~dn of j CDYn1Y DI ~ Ltinld ane 1 ~ 1j ~ l~T ~,~-U(._ rM AmdpIROMd NOlary Puhuc, grwnNlr ppOxna ~' ""' ~ ~ i f ) / ' .,Qp ru+~l/fa//I7~ YG/i ns~ l DptppnYly tnown tolM X pOYRC IOnN Or11M 6dwppl fahplptlorY W idMCp IDglMpwponlNwMNnwMIN /NG ~.t,.~ tu0fcr~ppe to lop wllnln lnRINTMI,AW K11MMpdppolMl ~prKUllO it ,~~ _ WI1NfSR my nRM pno olhtiN eK~ y / 1 c:HNI:~ Y;~w;Cp-~' \ AC_17A I t9Y6___ .e.:.:.u gpYy 'f . ;~.Y JY dd2MA^~YO :JIIIIR IDMIYtp RA owR uMU NI11Q IfA fi2i Ii A DRRRRAL 11.'.RRgILR00RNRMT~~ILWi Odi [ROIp ACRNONLLD6RALRT. [. C, PAPTR[RSbt D, CORIOMl'i, ifC, ' O .~ W h p Jerrold d SkpAnde Ewing Jenold Ewlnp 207-201-27 207-X101-28 ~ L r~ ~ _ M r--~ ABBOW BOUTB tNOtMtttt/tLANNttt ~~ S~ . 17t! a warp a 011r 1)Kd~r Y•IL ro atp of wew CSlamppry P.O. Br 107 waa Cllweepp, U 91770 [Nq rpY9 flr t8N IOI1 Mppppr'90[[ ~l1.7~1\ 1 POR A VALUABLE CONBIDEIIA770N, 196tbt Ot ~8fth n hartby •ctpowl[dptd. Jerrold E. EXin9 ana Sfe9Hntl R E in h spa tl a d 'f J i c i [ ORAM(J7 ro tlM al! M wm CY~w9[, • n7rs1PY CapaYbl, r PAL4EhffN1' to RMtl Purposes r. o[. rd p9r IrlgNlp lr wwrlr trap of wdtp Cltm9nw, C6rtpotlr BartOrp, wNm C11Bfanls, D~vB[a [[ POBnr tr vor[h 10.00 [at of er pwth SO.Iq tae warrW •t riche •wl•p of eM [ollovtp! d•Nr1hM prvp•rtP: Pvrelvv o[ eh• w•t t/1 of th• •oneh 1/1 of Lot I5, S•cefov 9, 2ow•nlp 1 Nnth, [vvp 7 w•t, 9r Nrwrdlvv rN •vd X•rldl•e, •ccvrdlv~ co X•p o[ Gn••wp tavd•, a p•r W raordW tv lave 1 0[ N•p!r Py 9, remrd• of Sa Mrardlvo COU•c7, d•NrthM •• follow: [vtionly{ •C • poly[ w tM [oath I1N et a!d Lot I5, • dt[uvc• of 198.04 • [ac aR of eM [eothrnt mrar o[ utd lop th•ve• vorch ]]0.9t Net; LM•C• w•e lIL6{ [wq eM•e• wu[A 770.91; thwe• wrt 111.64 fwe to eM polo[ of M8lvvivl, !1[C[PTI80 eMMtrw M• wNr1P 60.00 tat. tM ar[• •pd d1rCNINt O! th[ •bow AweN MA n...... ~ earn of eM w7olnte! .crab a .how Oo old ap. -~ ~ - _~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~ 4 EA.rt,_.t --~'~td ORNirAI A/C1R c OOIMMI[T 81W O1( ~~/EIYII/L On InItIM ~~WOI _ / ~ OOp 191rptlOre mt. Counh of Sty 6~rnA.//NA } ~ /A.// ~ ~ ~~- t'AL IM uMlnpnev MM•ry PuOUt. ptttpnNir appNr[a ILY{~/J/A ..,/ tires//r/.: ,~~4// 7 D!rlpn[Ih tMMllmm• plpr•d le mlon ln•M[it01 NIIl1•CIOry •vldlvc• 41M pw•wV[1'•110N ntmgW A/! au6Nnt•010'M ~~^ .,Y~'"'1~"1L!"'eAL W11 nMNNInM1, [IM [Ctlgw~rpgplMl ~NlCUtt0~1 M ~1;;•~~.14:~ST•ty111(eB inl nYq nM O111ciN N4 ' ~.LLC~tAI'f:t44 1 ~ I~ 'N t1p4gN rA11M1 Y!1 48I! I[ A 9iBlBAL ACtetOMl.[OpOp~l. !li•8t tl88 w0lr dC[XOX[.t00[X[NT, t.l. PARTX[118XIF Cp[lOrl8r 9[C. S1 ti ~,~ I ~ J ~~{{ NI ~a Jerrold d SiepRnde Ewing Jerrold Ewip 207-201-27 207-20f-28 -- i 1 ~ b~i ti ! I _ i y I Mi M i 1 __ f---~ ARROW ROUTE aNO~nasurrcenntas S3 RESOLUTION N0. F") -' ~7~ • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT ANO DEDICATION FROM JERROLD E. ENING AND SIEGLINOE R. ENING AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME NHEREAS, the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Lo establish requirements for construction of frontage improvements in conjunction with the Baker Avenue and Arrow Route Storm Orafn and Street 2mprovement Rroject; and NNEREAS, installation of curb, gutter, drive approach, sidewalk, street lights and street pavements located at 8570 and 8576 Arrow Route, to be made part of the Baker Avenue and Arrow Route Stores Drain and Street Improvement Project; and NHEREAS, Jerroid E. Ewing and Sleglinde R. Ewing have agreed Lo dedicate Rfght-of-May as reimbursement to the Gity for said improvements. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept said Improvement Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Cierk to sign same, and directs the Cfty Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. • ~-1~~ Sy ~.~ 1.a1V Vlt~AIRVIV IIH STAFF REPORT DATE: May 6, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer ~~U.Np~ ~`~'\~ y ~ . I9-' SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication between Lee D. Jennings, Imo Jennings, Lewis D. Jennings, Mildred L. Byars and Marjorie D. Barwlse and the City of Rancho Cucamonga far Street Frontage Improvements at 8624 Arrow Route • It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Agreement for lnatallation of~ PuDltc Improvement and Dedication between Lee 0. Jennings, Imo Jennings, Lewis D. Jennings, M7ldred L. Byars and Marjorie 0. BarwlSe and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACIfQ01Np/ANAL YS I5: Tna aiiacbed suoject agreement oetween the city and Lee D. Jenningys, Imo Jennings, Lewis D. Jennings, Mildred L. Byars and Marjorie D. BanrlSe provides for street improvements which include curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights and street pavements along the Jennings Arrow Route frontage. Jennings agreed to grant to the City a Roadway Easement to allow For the widening and improvement of Arrow Route in return for the construction of said improvements. Said street improvements will be constructed 1n conjunction with the City's Baker Avenue and Arrow Route Storm Oratn and Street Improvement Project. Res c CII submitted, R H:ko Attachments S S' A9lEEMERT FOR INSTALLATION OF PBBLIC IMPROYEJEtIT AND DED[GTIpI This Agreement is erode and entered into this day of 1987 by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'CITY") and Lee D. Jennings, Imo M. Jennings, Lewis 0. Jennings, Mildred L. Byars, and Matorle D. Barwise, as toint tenants (hereinafter referred to as "OMNER') far the lnstallatton of certain public improvements including, but not limited W curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights and street peveaw!nts along a portion of Arrow Route and Raker Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A. Recitals . • (1) CITY has prepared pions and speciflcstians for, and presently contemplates the instatlatlon of, public improvements along Arrow Route from the Cucamonga Creek Channel to 1930' west of Baker Avenue and Baker Avenue tram Bth Street to FaotA111 Boulevard (the "Baker-Arrow Protect" hereinafter in this Agreement). (ti) ONNER ores that certain real property, identified as San Bernardino County Assessors Parcel No. 207-201-23, fronLing along Arrow Route which property 1s within the limits of the Baker-Arrow Protect and described as follows: The East 72 feet of the Nest 203.64 feet of the East 1/2 of the South 1/2 of Lot 15 of the Cucamonga Fruit Lands, Section 9, Township 1 South, Range 7 Nest, excepting the highway. (fii) ONNER desires to participate 1n the Baker-Arrow Protect so as to dedicate necessary Rights-of-Nay related to street frontage improvements along ownars property aL 8624 Arrow Route ("the Jennings Portion" here/nafter). -1- s6 CITY 1s willing t0 include the Jennings Portion within the Baker-Arrow Projec~ upon the term and conditions hereinafter set forth. NOM TNEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and ONNER as follows: 1. OMNER shall execute a Deed of Ease~ent in favor of CITY for street right-of-way and related purposes in forty and content identical to that attached hereto as Exhibit "A'. 2. CITY 1s authorized to cause OMNER's Deed of Easement to be recorded forthwith upon execution of this Agreement. 3. CITY shall Include the Jennings Portion as a part of the construction of the Baker-Arrow Protect and shall cause all necessary puD11c improvements to be Installed in accordance with LITY's plans and speciflcatlons therefor. 4. OMNER agrns to grant to CITY, its elected officials, officers, agents, employees and contractors such rights of entry and/or temporary construction easements as are deemed necessary by CiTY's City Engineer W cause the campletlon of the Jennings Portton. 5. .This Agreement shall he Governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 6. [n the event any legal proceeding 15 instituted to enforce any terms or provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in said Legal proceeding shall be ent1H ed to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the other party in an amount determined Dy the Court to be reasonable. 7. This Agreement is 6lndtng upon and shall inure to the benefits of the parties hereto and to their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, wherever the context requires or admits. -2- s7 8. tt is understood that the intent of this Agreewent is rwt to relieve ` ~ tM responsibitTifes of tM owners for the su6,lect parcel(s) with regards to the raneal and usual public isryrovNSents conditioned or ttQuired as a part of lane developnent or redevelope~ent. laproveeents mould include streets, -. sidewalks, street lights, uLiitty undergrounding, street landscaping, etc. 9. Tfits Agreeeront supersedes any and all other agresents, whether orai or in writing, between the parties with respect to tM subject Batter hettpf. Each party Lo this Agtteeent acknowtedgls that tro ttpttsentatton by any party which 1s not eiWOdted Mroin nor any other agree~ent, statsent or pro~ise not contained in tM s Agreesent shalt be valid or binding. Any codification of this Agreeebnt sMll De effective only tf tt is in writing signed Dy all of tM parties Mrcto. IN NITH:SS HEREOF, tM parties Mttto Mve executed this Agr~aeent on tM day and year itrst above written. • CITY fRO/QTT OMER CITY OF AANCND CUCANDNGII CALIFORNIA, a ewrMCfpal corporation By: enn s u , yor ee enn ngs ea enn ngs ew s enn ngs re yarn ore are se -3- S ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: • every u e , y er orney • • -4- S5 • STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On 19 before aK the un ers gne o ry u c, persona y appearc an A. AUTHELET personally known to 6e to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, and known to axz to be the persons who executed the within instrument on behalf of said aanitipal corporation, snd acknowledged to me that such awniclpal corporation executed Tt. NITNESS MY NANO AND OFFICIAL SEAL o ary gna rc STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ ss COUNTY OF SAN BERNAROINO ) • On this the day, of before me, the un ers gne o ry u c persona y appearc ( ) personalty known to ae i i proves w ~e on the Dasis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose naaK(s) subscribed to Lhe within instrument and acknowledged tha executed 1t. NITNESS NY W1N0 AI~OFFfCIA SEAL o ary gna urc NOTE: NHEN DOCUMENT IS EXECUTED 8Y A CORPORATION OR PARTNERSHIP, THE ABOVE ACKNONLEOGEMENT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. A CORPORATION/PARTNERSHIP ACKNONlEOGEMENT TS"REQQIREQ- -4- 60 ~, k W'~ u O ~~ l 17 20/-07'' 207- 20/-~ ~4 m r,, i i~ d I ~ a \' ~-, lye, r; i j ~ ~~ ' ~~ ( lG y~ saW-CUT ,~ \ ~ i ~; JO/N i ~ I I ~ O 4i ~, - ~.~• 1. . ~ ~ a.~ ~i 18 0 A 7 7 D L 207- 20/- 20 207- it 20/- 23 4 I~ Oar ~ j tl3 Q Q u n~Q ~IQ ~ ~ 0 V v ~ bl~ I ~ i (~ ~ ~~ 01w i I ~' NKKUw --- - - _ / / --- _ " ,v I. II 207- 262-OS • 19 " B_V U Ctly c 207-20/-24 ~, Bemar cur0 Z F7C:^: %.t °_(evac ;~ ~ 2G 1\~1 n 1 : .n i j j ~ r _ 4' e~,'~2 '~' ~~ ? ~ . ~~ '` ~a ,o ~ I ~ i M4D20NE AVENUE fo / OESCRIP CJTY Or' PLAN RESOLDTION N0. 8 7 -/ 7.3 • A RESOLUTION aF THE Citt COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AIREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IWROYEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM LEE O. JENNINGS, IMA JENNIN65, LENIS D. JENNINGS, NILOREO BYARS AND WUWORIE D. BARYISE AND AUTNORIiING THE IMYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME MHEREAS, the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucaronga to establish requirerents for construction of frontage lrproverents 1n conJunctton with the Baker Avenue and Arrow Route Storr Drain and Street IrproveaKnt ProSecL; and NHEREAS, installation of curb, gutter, drive approach, sidewalk, street lights and street pavaents located at 8624 Arrow Route, to be arde part of the Baker Avenue and Arrow Route Storr Oratn and Street IrprovearnL Protect; and NNEREAS, Lee 0. Jennings, tar Jennings, Lewis D. Jennings, Mildred Byars and Maryorie D. Barwlse have agreed to dedicate Right-of-Nay as rotrburserent to the City for said lrproverenLs. NON, THEREFORE, BE I7 RESOLVED that the .City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaronga, California, does accept "sold Irprovaent Agreerent, authorizes the Mayor and the City Cierk to sign sae, and directs the City . Clerk to record sane 1n Lhe Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. l ~T J Gi • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: Apr11 I5, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, G1ty Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer Ll U.l~ y ~\~' Y ;: 6 z 19" I SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication between Donna M. Filan and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements at 8556 Arrow Route It is recaawended that City Council adopt the attached Resotutlon approving Lhe Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication between Donna M. Filan and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. lACKaIdMC/AIMLTSIS: The attached suD~ect Agreement between the Ctty and Donna M. FTlan provides for street improvements which include curbs, gutters, e1 Aav~t Y~ ~.~.~~ _ •.. Y pavements along Fig wCuu, iii RL i i ida a,u 5ireet Lhe F1lanls Arrow Route Frontage. Ms. Filan has agreed to grant to the City a Roadway Easement to allow for the widening and improvement of Arran Route Tn return for the construction of said improvements. Said street improvements will De constructed 1n con,~unction with the CTty's Baker Avenue and Arrow Route Storvl Drain and Street Improvement Project. Resp~ bmf tted, M:L r Attachments G3 AOREENENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC • iMPROYEMENi ANp DEDICATION This Agreement is made and entered into this day of 1987 by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corDO ra lion (herclnafter referred to as "CITY') and Donna M. Filan, (hereinafter referred to as "ONNER") for the installation of certain public Tmprovements including, but not limited to curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lfgnts and street pavements along a portion of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue 1n the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A. Recitals (i) CiTY has prepared plans and specifications for, and presently • contemplates the installation of, public improvements along Arrow Route from the Cucamonga Creek Channel to 1930' west of Baker Avenue and Baker Avenue from 8th Street to Foothill Boulevard (the "Baker-Arrow Project" hereinafter in this Agreement). (it) OUNER owns that certain real property, identified as San Bernardino County Assessors Parcel No. 207-201-04, fronting along Arrow Route which property is within the 11m1 is of the Baker-Arrow Droj ect and described as follows: The East 65.82 feet of the Nest 398.04 feet of the Nest 112 of the South 1/2 of Lot 15 of the Cucamonga Fruit Lands, Section 9, Township 1 South, Range 7 Nest. fits) DNNER desires to participate in the Baker-Arrow Project so as to dedicate necessary Rights-of-Nay related to street frontage improvements along owners property at 8556 Arrow Route ("the F11an Partlon" herclnafter). CITY r, ~ 1- ~Y is wi icing to include the Fil an Portion within the Baker-Arrow Project upc: the terns and conditions hereinafter set forth, NOM THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and OMNER as follows: 1. OMNER shalt execute a Deed of Easement in favor of CITY for street right-of-way and related purposes in forty and content identical to that attached hereto as Exhibit "A'. 2. CITY is authorized to cause ONNER's Deed of Easement to be recorded forthwltA upon execution of this Agreeaknt. 3. CITY snail include the Ftlan Portion as a part of the construction of the Baker-Arrow Project and shall cause all necessary public Lprovements to be Installed in accordance with CITY's plans and specificattans therefor. I. ONNER agrNS W grant to CITY, its elected officials, officers, agents, sployas and contracWrs such rights of entry and/or tsporary construction easements as aro deemed necessary by CITY's C1ty Engineer to~ cause the completion of the Filan Dortton, 5. Th1s Agreement shaft be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Star ~+: rel!f^rr.!a. 6. In the event any legal procaedtng is instituted to enforce any terms or provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall De entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the other party to an amount determinad by the Court to ba reasoneDle. 7. This Agreement is binding upon and sMil inure to the benefits of the parties hereto and 4o their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, wMrever the context requires or aAeits. • -2- ~~ • • 8. It is understood that the intent of this Agreement is not to relieve the respons1Di11t/es of the owners for the subject parcel(s) with regards to the normal and usual public improveemnts conditioned or rcQulred as a part of land developaent or redevelopment. Improvements wouid include streets, sidewalks, street lights, utility undergrounding, street landscaping, etc. 9. ibis Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, wMLher oral or in writing. Datreen the parties w1Lh respect to CM subject matter hereof. Each party t0 Lh1s Agreement xknawledges that no rcprcsentation by any party which 1s not embodied Menlo nor any other agreement, statement or promise not conLalned 1n this Agresent shall be va11d or Dinding. Any modlficatton of this Agrewent shall ba affective only 1f 1t is in writing signed Dy all of tM parties Moto. ~ IN NITNE55 N1IEREOF, tM parLi es Mnto Mve executed this Agreement on tM day and year first above written. CITY CITY ff RANCHO CUCAMONOA CALIFORNIA, a muMcipal corporation P110-flTY OYIER By: eons u , yor ATTEST: every u e y e ~- onna n APPROYEO AS TO FORM: -~Ci>=y orne~ -3- (0 6 H'Hf fHSRf 41~Y•ftlMr I4MMrwwfwr'f rf+Fff f rftrrfNwwefff 1f Mff rrirrwwA4f iMxrswar STATE OF CAL IfORNIA 1 . I ss COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On 19 before aN! the un ers gne o ry u c, persona y appearc an L A. AUTHELET personally known to De to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, and known t0 me to be the persons who executed the within instrument on behalf of Bald municipal corporation, and acknowledged to me that such municipal corporation executed it. NITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL o ary .gna ure STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 ss COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On this the ~~ day, of i'I ~ ~ ~9~~ before • Ine. ~ ~~~,J~~i soy-;'iZ the un- e'a"r""'Is'gne o ry u c peTi"~rsoniTly appeared ( ) personally known to me ( ~ Droved to xu nn ih. ti,_1t s cai;fac w„q e.l,iwme iv ue cne personl si whose name(s) subscribed to the within Instrument and acknowledged tha ~ executed 1t. NITNESS MY WIND ANII~FFICIA SEAL JUDITH A AC0S7A NOT~R, LUaLIG •4UIagNl4 NOTE: NFiEN OCCUMENT IS EKECUTED BY A CORPORATION OR PARTID:RSHIP, THE ABOVE ACKNONLEDGEMENT !S NOT ACCEPTABLE. A CORPORATION/PARTNERSHIP ACKNONLEDGEMEN7 ~_ -4- r~ L 67 ~~~ ~ z~ • ~ v 12 ,~-20.-2' n, ~/ 13 SCGLE HOB/z. /:,40' !/E?T. /'~4' 14 15 FLAN SCALE ~ i"-ao' 207-201-27 2' FILAN ~'^ T 207-20/-03 a 207-20I-04 ~'` ~ < 207-2c ~'~ ~,; k ~! ,~'3 i , ~' ~ I~ 5~a a ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ ~~ I d ~ z~ o p i /ciu m 41 ~'~ f'~ ~ P I n rl i I i. I /~_ / ' c~7yEP ~ ~ ~ 2'iE.OT//E2 _ -,1^ 2 ~_ trn'' "~ ~ ~~~ ~~ i +. _ 207- 2~l-07 ;W .; i ARROW _ ROUT ~~ =r ,~ ~8 IR'Ollpele tle911~1iM . 47 a Rr[LO CWemonp mgt e1001ii 11111E ro rxP a ^.Oteo P.O. Bdt pT IlrrLO CLnm94µ CA 917,10 eN[a A90Y9 T11~/9N P111 eemflpar9 Ntt ~~ ~SC+liLl~ 1 POl A VALUAtLB CONS~2A77pN, rtoiyl a frhi[0s huaE) eelmowlfdpd, a~A['r1YA b IV Ql) a Barb C1oe49p, . Aitf91[ipU CotpNetka, u P.13FlAIdT fa Noed Purposes I., t,Y.r.p.ler L.ur r P[oP[e19 i WtM a ^r[~pf.L~e, caf9q aa..lwralm, s[.tea CLtl9nle, D~nOtd «Ib~plrc lTr Doren 10.00 [we of eM .vote fO.Op twe raeuru at r19A[ aryl.. o[ [M follor{e~ yurthW prowrq: the uec 1/1 of chef porelev et the wee I/3 of tM amth 1/2 of Let I5, Sectlw 9, TowahlP l mouth. tu9a ) wrt. Su yrnardlno Saw ud Merldlu, acevrdlry to I4p o[ Cuceeovp Lavda, a Nr uep rworyd to Saok { nt Nau, Prye 9, racarda of 4u yrurdtw Cowt). deacrihN w follow: • Setlmlv9 at . pvloc N tM ePO:h lIw of Nld Loc IS a dleuou of 266.60 [ut trN tM fonthwee corao of utd Got 13, cMoce uRh J10.91 bet; [Mma urt IJLdt furl cMUe eau[h J30.91 furl theoc• wet 1]1.64 tut to [M pvtoc o[ M/imlry. iha aru •nd tlL boce• o[ [M show tluerlMd prapertY art cwPmd cn tM eeuun of the ad~oleie~ Rneb a abw oo old up. flate0 7 S7 , ANN ~"~... LN[NlML ACKNONII! I~NT \v ~- Slala of ~~//)~YI)/A. On IMtIM ~vayol // / / c~ ~__ t9 ~'MICn me CoNnn el .J(l2 Beriw iAi ~d}a ,JU~1/-f1i fi' a-i ~1r. IM undtrflprlt0 Mo1My WpNe py»^tI~T tCCeLttl 1lcnna iYl7r G,_/un = petNOYlY known lolm ~pIONd 10 nN1 On IMOaaia 41 NIIfINloty FMlnca NMIM NraPNN wMN MIMI^ /5 suONnpatl to let [r11nIn IMIrye1N1.YMeChlbwNgpap lhN ShL efNUlbY OYPI^1L S(AL YYITNE9911ry Mnd wltl 411iCU1 N91 JUpItY 4.tGGSTA /} • R1M rURK -CI[NOIYit J~~ ~~ ~~ 1N eta 10X911 '~L/ ~'GA __ 9/ieA M99t 19P f on P9PB [91 099Wt. ~/ nC99019i0pppP, IIJA99 U/9 wOPY AC1N011G[IN:9N9NT~ t.6, plJITNCAUMlP C0910911T9,95C• G9 ~~ RESOLUTION N0. .~' 7 - ~ 7`/ • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN A91EElENT FOR INSTALLATION ff PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM DONNA M. fILAN AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME k1RiREAS, the Ciq Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucaaonga to establish rcquireaents for construction of frontage iaprovea>ents in coniunction with the Baker Avenue and Arrow Route Stone Drain and Street Iaproveaent Proiect; and NIIEREAS, installation of curb, gutter, drive approach, sidewalk, street lights and street pareaxnts located at 8556 Arrow Route, to be nude part of the Baker Avenue and Arrow Route Stores Drain and Street Ilproveaent Pro,~ect; and NiIEREAS, Donna M. Filan Mve agreed to dedicate Right-of-Nay as rcianurseawnt to the C1ty for said taprovtuents. NON, THEREFORE, BE [T RESOLVED that the Ctq Council of the Ciq of Rancho Cucaaonga, California, does accept said Ialprovaaa!nt AgreaaMSnt, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign,sale, and directs the Ciq Clerk to record sane in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino • Counq, California. ~/ ~ ' I T ~"// I~TTV l1 RT i] STAFF REPORT DATE: April 15, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer ~~~.~ot~ .~~~ -, ~- <,' ~ ~ i ~F Y' :t F ~. 7 10;' SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement for Installation of Pubiic improvement and Dedication between Roseanne King, John Balwochus and Edward L. Balwochus and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements at 8643 Arrow Route It is recommended that City Council adapt the attached Resolution approving the Agreement for Installation of PuDtic Improvement and Dedication between Roseanne King, John Baiwochus and Edward L. Balwochus and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • lACKBRdANI/ANALYSIS: Thy attached subject Agreement Detw!!n the City and Roseanne King, John Balwochus and Edward L. Baiwochus provides for street improvements rhich include curbs. nutters. sidewalks. drive aooroaches. street lights and street pavements along the King's and Balwochus's Arrow Route Frontage. The KTngs and Balwochus have agreed to grant to the CTty a Roadway Easement to allow for the widening and improvement of Arrow Route in return for the construction of said improvements. Said street improvements will be constructed 1n conjunction with the City's Baker Avenue and Arrow Route Siora Drain and Street Improvement Project. Respe sudai tted~ / ~o R :LEH: / , Attachments '71 A9IEEIEMi FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROYEJENT AID DEDICATION This Agreement is made and entered into this day of 1987 by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY") and Roseanne King and John P. Balwochus and Edward L. Baiwochus, as toint owners (hereinafter referred to as "OWNER") for the installation of certain public improvements including, but nat limited to curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights and street pavements along a por ~ ) ~ i Baker Avenue 1n the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Q~~-`~~ A. Recitals ~~~h~'CnnK (i) CITY has pry ,ficatlons for, and presently • contemplates the instal~acion of, public improvements along Arrow Route from the Cucamonga Creek Channel to 1930' west of Beker Avenue and Baker Avenue from 8th Street to foothill Boulevard (the "Baker-Arrow Protect" hereinafter in this Agreementl• (it) OWNER owns that certain real property, identified as San Bernardino County Assessors Parcel No. 207-262-38, fronting along Arrow Route which property 1s within the limits of the Baker-Arrow Protect and described as follows: The West 10 feet of the North 167.85 feet of that portion of Lot 18, Section 9, Township 1 South, Range 7 Nest and described as follows: Cammtncing 30 feet South and 256.41 feet Mest of the Northeast corner of said Lot; thence Mest along the Southerly Itne of 10th Street a distance of 140 feet; thence South a al stance of 267.58 teat; thence East a distance of 140 feet; thence North a dl stance of 267.58 feet to the Paint of Beginning. Excepting therefrom said Nest 70 feet of the North 167.85 feet that portion being in the street. 1- 73 (till ONNER desires to participate in the Baker-Arrow Protect so as to. dedicate necessary Rights-of-Nay related to street frontage improvements along owners property at 8643 Arrow Route ("the King-Balwochus Portion" hereinafter). CITY is willing to include the King-Balwochus Pardon within the Baker-Arrow Protect upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. NOM THEREFORE, tt is agreed by and betreen LITY and ONNER as follows: 1. ONNER shall execute a Deed of Easement in favor of CITY for street right-of-way and related purposes 1n fona and content identical to that attached hereto as Exhibit "A". 2. CITY is authorized to cause ONIIEIt's Deed of Easement to be recorded forthwith upon executten of this Agreement. 3. CITY shall include the King-Balwochus Portion as a part of the construction of the Baker-Arrow ProJecL and sha1T cause all necessary public improvements t0 6e instailed in accordance with CIri's plans and • specifications therefor. 4. ONHER agrees Lo 4rant to clTr, +~~ .lectcd afH t7 "~a, YI~IGlR, agents, employees and contractors sucA rights of entry and/or temporary construction easements as are deemed necessary by CITY's Ctty Engineer to cause the completion of the King-8alwochus Portion. 5, TMs Agreement shell De governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 6. in the event any legal proceeding 1s instituted to enforce any terms or provisions of this Agreement, the prcvatling party to sold legal proceeding shall be en ti tied to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the other party in an amount deternlned by the Court to be reasonable. • -2- 7y t~ J 7. This Agreement is Dindi ng upon and shall inure Lo the benefits of the parties hereto and to their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, wherever the context requires ar admits. 8. It 1s understood that the intent of this Agreement is not to relieve the responsibilities of the owners for tM subject parcel(;) with regards to the normal and usual public improvements conditioned or required as a part of land development or redevelopment. Improveaw:nts would include streets, sidewalks, street lights, utility undergrounding, street landscaping, etc. 9. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agrtdaents, whether oral or in writing, beMeen tM parties with respect to LM subject natter hereof. Each party to thla Agrcanent acknorledgas that no representation by any party whicA 1s not sbodted herein nor any otMr agrcemant, statement or promise not conUtned in this Agreement sMll De valid or binding. Any modlficatlon of this AgreemanL shall be effective only tf tt 1s in writing signed by all of tM parties hereto. IN NITMESS MIEREDF, tM parties MroLO Mve executed this Agreement on the My anA y~a~ H~s1 aMy~ vrlfl~r. CITY PRdENTY QtfEEll CITY OF RANCIfO CUCAMON611 CALiFORNiA, a municipal corporcti On By: enn s u , yor ATTEST: oseanne ng o n a woc us ar a woc us AFVRDYED AS TO FORM: every u e e , y er -3- y orney ').i 4R*tf****#***R*S#**#i*!*#*'*fi##}Hii**i*fi*tFR*#*VRM*i#***i*#i#*##f#*i**ifii#i • STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss COUNTY OF SAN BERNAROINO ) On 19 before me the un ers gne otary u c, persona y appeare an L A. AUTHELET personally known to be t0 be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, and known t0 ax! W be the persons who executed the within instrument on behalf of said municipal corporation, and acknowledged to me that such municipal corporation executed it. NITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL o ary gna uro STATE OF CALIFORNIA ss COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On this the day, of before • me, the un ers gne o ry u c persona y appeare ( i yer>unaiiy known co me ( ) proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to 6e the person(s) whose name(s) subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged Lha executed it. NITNESS MY HAND AND~OFFfCTAL-SEAL o ary gna ure NOTE: NHEN DOCUIO:NT IS EXECUTED BY A CORPORATION OR PARTNERSHIP, THE ABOVE ACKNONLEDGEMENT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. A CORPORATION/PARTNERSHIP ACKNONLEDGEMENT • -4- 7G c J 4 m 3 ~C p O .~ ~-~-_ 207-2Oi-2C Bernar±;ro a~n~~.:ur ae7cr :dq e: ncr:- >< I cur0 27' ner:o of cence r:i-e :mdr;ecc:: Foetn~ll Bcufeva rC an1 Baker a.er.ue p~~ m vt _levat ion 1237.586 . h~ k 207-20/-/O C Q I ~~ ! m O O 0 yt yl~", ~ Y ~ ! iv iI O y Opp R ao oIn ~ 0 3 I ~ ~ ~ ,4 1I ~l~ n,~ ¢ ~ ' s',Z I '~ I N 1 I ~ 1 W N _ ^-~- - ~~ l~ 2s2-a5 h T, F~3 y 1587 - / J J ©RI n, - ~ n~ J a°i s'Z N 2 ~ ~ h,~ ~ 7 207-?62- 38 a ~J ~ m~a ~,a KlFlfr 4 ~ a;'O s i~ >'JA'LWOCNLIS . ~ ` 'v DESCRIPTION OF REVISION oar CITY OF i~ANCHO CUCAM'J _ PLAN AND PROFILE OF STREET I?.IPROVEMENTS FOR ARROW ROUTE 4PP4CVED BY CATE C!T'I E,VGINEcR qC~! JE SinV .wj .LI~~~ °E::'. ==:,N L.O.KIN~, INC. 2151 E. "D" ST. SUITE 120 A ;HE 6 ''`-'E7 77 ONTARIO, CA. 91764 a.E N7- _aae i RESOLUTION N0. P7-~ 7S • A RESOLUTION OF THE LITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNfi11, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTlND AN AgIEEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROYEMENi AND DEDICATION FROM ROSEANNE KING, JOHN BAL110CHUS, AND EDNARD L. BALNOCHUS AND AUTHp1IZIN6 TIE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SATE NHEREAS, the C1ty Clerk of the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga to estabitsh requirements for construction of frontage improvements Tn con,1unction with the Baker Avenue and Arrow Route Stort Orafn and Street Improvement Protect; and NHEREAS, lnstallatton of curb, gutter, drive approach, sidewalk, street lights and street pavements located at 8643 Arrow Route, to be made Vroiect; ~ Baker Avenue and Arrow Route Stors Dra1n and Street Improvement NHEREAS, Roseanne King, John Balwochus and Edward L. Balwochus Mve agreed to dedicate Right-of-N~y as reimbursement to the City for said improvements. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLYED that the C1ty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept said ImproveamnL Aaraex+r, authorizes the Mayor and the City claw .^ _~;,-, ~, a~ directs t11e City S'2r!; to •&.or5 yi+r in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino • County, CallforM a. ~C / ~J 7g ,.,".., „ STAFF REPORT V ~` "~1v; ~, ~~` is t DATE: April 15, 1987 T0: City Louncii and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Magufre, City Engineer BY: Michael D. Long, Sr. Public Norks Inspector > ~~ F J ier- SOBJEC7: Authortzation to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Baker Avenue and Arrow Route Storm Drain and Street Improvement Pro,~ect. The Engineer's estimate for construction is 51,534,000 to be funded by Systems Development and Drai nags Funds and reimbursed by Mousing Set-A-Side Funds REC01/EIID!ITI011: It is recommended that City Council approve Dlans and specifications for the "Baker Avenue and Arrow Route Sturm Drain and Street [mprovenent" Prnf orb and aDprnn-•M it tcFr.:1 -^i r,?art ton r!`,r-'±", ng the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". • Background/gnalysis The subject protect plans and spedfication have been completed by L. 0. King, incorporated of Ontario, California and have been reviewed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for ^`!ructicr, i::1,5:;, ^:S, to ue fuuue~i uy Syi.ans ueveiopment bonds an0 reimbursed by Noosing Set-A-Side Redevelopment Funds. Legal advertising fs scheduled for April 20, 1987 and April 27, 1987 with the bid opening an May 1, 1987 at 2:00 p, m. Respec f submitted, t - _. ~ RMM:MDL: w E.J 79 RESOLUTION N0. S~-~~~° A RESOLIRIdI OF THE CITY COLNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO LUCAMDNGA APPROVING PLANS pN0 SPECIFICAT10i5 FOR THE "BAKER AVENUE AND AKRON ROUTE STORM ORAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. NHEREAS, it fs the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. NHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT AE SOLVED that the plans and sptifications presented by the Lity of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Baker Avenue and Arrow Route Storm Drain and Street Improvement Protect". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: 'TI OT ICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cuc anon ga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the r itv r.lerk in the nffires of the ('.itv of Raneha Cucamonga. on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 7th day of May 1987, sealed bids or proposals for the "Baker Avenue and Arrow Route Storm Drain Street Improvement Protect" in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of Baker avenue and Arrow Route Storm Drain Street Improvement Pro,Iect". PREVAILING NAGE: Notice is hereby given that fn accordance wf th the provisions of California labor Code, Division 2, 9art 1, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a Similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing 80 rate of per dies wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the• Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are an file in the office of the City Clerk of the Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as pensalty to the City of Rancho Cucanonga, twenty-five doll are (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or meUanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as anended by Chapter 911, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the Cal ifarnia apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions to sections 1717.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentfce5 by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor • employing tradesmen in any apprentice able occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the publ7c works project and which adninisters the apprenticeship progran in that trade for a certificate of aonrnvat, ?~ - {coca wiii aiso nx the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will~~be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. Nhen unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or D. Nhen the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. Mhen the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. Nhen the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered appentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. LJ ~/ The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the a6al nistration of apprenticeship programs ff he employs registered apprentices or Journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. the Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1711.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be o6t ained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officta the Adninistratar of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or fran the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work far all workmen enployeO in the execution aF this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as anended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (f25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic enployed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which safd laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. • Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must sudnit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidders bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga far an anount equal to at least ten percent (10X) of the anount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter Soto the proposed contract ff the same is awarded to him, and in event of fat lure to enter into such Contract safd cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall becane the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the anount of the lowest bidder°s security shall be applied by the Cf ty of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the law bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The anount of the bond to be given to secure a fat thf ul perfarman ce of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100X) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an anount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the F J Q1 work contratted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contrctor will aiso be required to furnish a certificate . that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor wham a proposal farm has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class "A" license (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's license Law (California Business and professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time time this contract is awarded. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and speciff cats ons of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and spec if lcattons will be furnished upon applitatf an to the City of Rancno Cucamonga and payment of (25.00, said (25.00 is rwnrefundable. Upon written request Dy the bidder, copies of the plain and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional norn•eimbursahle payment of 55.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract • satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements a- Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Ptans and Spec iftcations regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor mav. upon the rn^Lrectcr's rcgce Y. aid "L lice Cuniraccor s sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities to lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cal ifornTa, reserves the right to reject any and ail bids. By order of the Council of the Lity of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Gated this 15th day of April, 1981. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this _ day of 19_ RTTEST: y er 83 rrmv nc. o ~ n.r on rrrn. wrnwrn STAFF REPORT t~~ , ` ~ ~ ' ~' _z GATE: April 15, 1987 ~s__ ' T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civ11 Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement for Installation of Public I mprovements (Undergrounding of Utilities) between Richwood Development Company and the L1ty of Rancho Cucamonga for the undergrounding of utilities along Arrow Route for Tract 12621 RELONEIDATION: It is recamm:nded that City Council adopt the attached eso u on approving the Agyreement for Installation of Public Improvements (Underground of Utititiesl between Rlchwood Development and the City of Rancho Cucamonga to an amount of 157,300.00. i 1 !_J BACK@OIANI/ANALYSIS: The attached subJect Agreement between the City an c eve opment Company provides for the underground of electrical transmission and telephone lines and the removal of existing poles along a portion of Arrow Route fronting Tract 12621. Said improvements will De constructed to conlunctton with the City's Baker Avenue and AITOw Route store n~+}n •_^d Strect :,.Y;c:~nt Pro3ect. Richwood 0eveiopment Company has agreed to pay the City the actual cost Incurred in undergrounding said utilities which is estimated to be 157,300.00. Respectf submitted, :LEH: Attachments BY AOAEEMEII'P !OA INATALLATION O! POBLZC INPAOVEMENTB (ORDEA0A00ADIN0 01 OTILITIEB) This Agreement is made and entered into this day of 1987, by and between the CZTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY") and RICHNOOD DEVEIAPMENT CO., a California Corporation (hereinafter ratarrad to as "DEVELOPER") for the undergroundinq of eleetrical transmiaaion and telaphona lines and removal of poles along a portion of Arrow Route in tRe City oL Rancho Cucamonga. A. Reoitale. (i) CITY has prepared plans and specifications for, • and presently contuplates the installation of, public improvements along Arrow Route and Baker Avenue (the "Arrow-baker Project" sometimes Rereinafter in thin Agreement). (iii uEVC1pP6R has Raretofore processed and had approved a development for certain real property identified as Final Tract No. 12621 located along Arrow Route, which property is within tRa liaita of the Arzow-Baker Project. (iii) A malarial portion of DEVELOPER'S obligations regarding the construction and installntion of public improvements necessitated by development of Final Tract No. 12621 is a requirement to underground overhead transmission lines (electrical and telaphona) and removal of poles along Arrow Route from Baker Avenue to Madrona Avenue. 1 8S C, (iv) DEVELOPER desires to participate in the Arraw- Baker Project so as to cause its obligation for undergroundinq electrical tranamiaaion and telephone linen to be discharged, and to contribute its pro-rata portion of the total coats of the Arrow-Baker Project rslatW to undergroundinq of electrical transmission and telephone lines along its property at Arrow Route from Baker Avenue to Madrone Avenue (^tha Baker-Madrone Portion" hereinafter). (v) CITY is willing to include the Bakst-Madrone Portion within the Arrow-Bakst Proj act upon the terms and conditions hsrsinaltsr eat forth. NOW, THEREFORE, 1t to agreed by and between CITY and • DEVELOPER as follows: 1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A., of this Agreensnt. 2. CITY shall include the Baker-Madrone Portion as a part of the construction of the Arrow-Baker Project and shall cause undergroundinq of electrical transmission facilities and removal of poles to occur in accordance with CITY'a plane and specifications theralor. CITY and DEVELOPER further agree that the limits of construction, for cost accounting purposes, of the Baker-Madrone Portion shall include ell a! DEVEIAPER'a frontage along Arrow Route at the property described in paragraph A.(ii), • 2 P6 above including corner cutoff(s), to a point approximately 445 feet west of Madrone Avenue along the southerly side of Arrow Route. ]. DEVELOPER agrees to pay to CITY, in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, CITY's actual costs incurred in constructing the Baker-Madrone Portion. The parties hereto agree that the present, estimated coat of said construction is $57,300.00, as shown in the Estimates of Construcilon attached hereto and identified as Exhibit "A". 4. DEVELOPER shall, concurrently with axecutlon of this Agreement by DEVELOPER, deposit with CITY the sum of $57,300.00 in cash, certificate o! deposit ~or passbook account, . in favor o! CITY, in form and content acceptable to CZTY's City Engineer. 5. Upon completion ar gyn. S^o•~-9akar Pwjau0, ane the Baker-Madrone Portion thereof, CITY shall cause a final accounting to be prepared and presented to DEVELOPER. Said final accounting shall specify the final, actual costs of construction oL the Baker-Madrone Portion. In the avant that the amount theretofore deposited by DEVELOPER in accordance with paragraph B.4, above, exceeds the ectual coat of construction of the Baker- Madzone Portion, CITY shall include with the final accounting presented to DEVELOPER its warzent in such amount so ae to cause DEVELOPER to have borne the actual cost of construction of the Baker-Madrone Portion. In the evenC thnt the ar punt theretofore 3 87 n u deposited with CITY by DEVELOPER is less than the actual cost of construction of the Baker-Madrone Portion as shown in said fine; accounting, said presentation of the final accounting, to DEVELOPER shall include a statement or invoice to DEVELOPER indicating the amount necessary to be paid by DEVELOPER so as to cause DEVELOPER to hove borne the actual cost of construction of the Baker-Madrone Portion. Said amount shall be due and payable to CITY, by DEVELOPER, within thirty (30) days of CZTY so mailing said final accounting and statement or invoice. In the event DEVELOPER !ails to psy to CITY the amount shown to ba due and owing by the final aecovntinq within thirty (30) days, then interact shall accrue thereon at the maximum legal rate. 6. DEVELOPER agrees to grant to CITY, its elected • officials, officers, aganta, employees and contractors such rights of antrv and/or t..~..rer,• cc„~t,-a..Liu„ easements as are deemed necessary by CITY~s City Engineer to cause the completion of the Baker-Madrone Portion. 7. The parties hereto understand and agree that, in the event the Arrow-Baker Project is discontinued or terminated prior to construction of the Baker-Madrone Portion, CITY shall promptly ralund to DEVELOPER any sums theretofore deposited with CITY. DEVELOPER shall thereafter be required to underground the electrical transmission and telephone liens, and remove all poles, in accordance with the conditions of approval heretofore imposed upon Final Tract Map Nn. 12621 within 60 daYS of refund 4 X8 by CZTY of DEVELOPER's deposit. In the event the Baker-Madrone PortioP. is constructed in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, and upon payment by DEVELOPER oY all of its pro-rata costa thereof, DEVELOPER shall ba deemed by CITY to have complied with the undergrounding requirements imposed by CITY and shall be discharged from the underground obligation along Arrow Route. 8. This Agreement shall ba governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 9. Zn the event any legal proceeding ie instituted to enforce any term or provision of this Agreement, the preveilinq party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' lees and costs from the other party in an amount • determined by the Court to be reasonable. 10. This Agreement Sa binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of any heirs, wvrr,.t..; ~, e+„-,iriaL~ni.ors, successors or assigns wherever the content requires or admits. 11. TAia Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, whether oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement or promise not contained in this Agreement shall ba valid or binding. Any modiricetion of this Agreement shall ba effective only it it is in a writing signed by all of the parties hereto. 5 89 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above. CZTY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA A Municipal Corporation By Mayor ATTEST: By c ty Clerk RICHWOOD COMPANY A CaliLornia Corporation By By • • 6 50 ac ~~~ .,, CITY' OF RANCHO CUCAVIONGA ~~ i >~ E4GZNEERI:7G DEPAdT`.L:R' s. i~ ~ ~' ~ PRELIMINARY • ~: b ' ~ 13n ' COST ES:::`.A:E Dace: 3/31/87 F~k UTi L:'IY Di,DERGRI;OLJiNG Ey9 ~_ ' FAR iia~T .1ti21 VO. ZT!_! ~t1.1.`n:::'! G:~ZT UNi: PA:[E A.`!'.'.^.~: ~ I ,= n l I I Edison and GTE Facilities 445 L.F. 70.00 S 31 ,150:OC 1011 Contingency ~ 3,115.00 • SUBTOTAL S .34,265.00 S 22,951.55 I r^T»' ~ ~ f 57,222.55 I r~~ I ~ I ~ ` I 9/ ~l R die y:r'ifIHJRC[YY fyyl p{RNx nI~iFN s r e b~/XY yyi R lrtr M xoa i ry< p ~ •J ~ s R e.New qR -. :StG ,Q f1 eli.. Y. x 1I } -- - pF `«= ARyR~OW • b• N r , sn R, } _... / _ _ n n•»»~ i rN w' ROUTE} - } } ~ KI rf I ~~~~~ ',~ • If I Y !~ y ts~es \ ~ ; \ •y~rC.er 10 nRIM( JI rM. IIOIN ~ ~ • tM •1 I I e n xuM fOT .e" N '•r. _ r~ ^I I ~. _, ~g P~ C ai«..oi» » xrll~ I>,'aal L!fl !'»I'~ } ! _ - -- I. ^__ah -.~._. nM•MYI-l }yep (~ iLl a ~~b « (er •a. a «an.. ,,V~a ea }f » I ~~ rf R Q31Ail' ~ e r~l i ~~ § ~LGu~~ ~'~' I q~- ~ r»~ YI;~---. ~,. I car I r .. 9 III ~- - `__ .o. r r-- 4 ~ a SALIY • e i ~..w ~ w 'x I fu ~ I ~'1~ ~ ~_-~ • .:x ~^ A ~~ ~ I w, o , 30 STREET ~ - - .~._ f~ i ~ wr-N _ r 21a I x x . a ~ ~ ~ II ~ I~~ 7l rT~I !-1' ~ Q 8 . I i e ~, r 1 ter; ~ ~` a I~r a ~'la ~n la -~ ~ , ~ ~ t ~1 b b '.l III ~ ••OI 0' ' tn~- .- ., / , I.. .. ,~ ,eI .--~ ~~. - I adad yr rw cut[R r}pxr NO a• }[twos ~ r . «d[an. FlN~ry 0uw,yT ]N rxx r ~ x• w• ca1N(na i I I ~YOIi•i(~ Yp •I •. r rM.^f0 Rt' '•1•i ^ ~wp ~e1u: V•.I ~f 9.~ • RESOLUTION N0. E~7_~~7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITT OF RANCHG CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT Fit INSTALLATION ff PUBLIC INPROVEfENTS (UNDERGROUNDIN6 OF UiILIT1E5) FROM RICH11000 DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR TRACT 12621 ANO AUTHORIZING THE M11Y0R AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SIDE NHEREAS, the City Couneil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to esiaDllsh requireaents for construction of undergroundtng electrical iransotsslon and telephone lines in conJunction with the Baker Avenue and arrow Route SLOrf Orain and Street Iaproveaent Pro,{ect; and NHEREAS, the undergroundtng of ut111t1es along Arrow Route fronting Tract 1262L, to be Dade part of the Baker Avenue and Arrow Route Storo Dra1n and Street In~proveslent Protect; and NHEREAS, Richwood Developaent Co~npaAy has suDaltted an Agreeaent for installation of PuDl1c Iaprovexnt as retaburseaknt to the City for said taprovements. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the.Clty Council of the Lity of Rancho Cucaaonga, Callfornla, does accept said' Agreeaent for Instsllatlon of . Pub11c Iisproveients, authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to sign sane, and directs the C1ty Clerk to rocord sane to the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino, Callfornla. 93 • CiTF OF R~ISCHO CL'CA110`GA STAFF REPORT ~~.~-_ ~ ttr)k _ !, :`` ! ~"~_ ^~ - /. ,- T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 1 BY; Linda Beek, Engineering Tenchnician i SUB SECT: Approval of Improvement Ezt ension Agreements for tracts 12936, 12938, 12939 and 12943, located in the Caryn Planned Community, submitted by Marlborough Development Corporation 04 TE: gpril 15, 1987 RECOMIENCi1TI01 It is recommended that the Lity Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the su btect extension agreements and securities and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk tb sign said agreements. ANALYSIS /9ACKGROLND Improvement Agreements and Improvement Securities to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements for Tracts 12936, 12938, 12939, and 12943 were approved by the Lity Council on March 1, 1986, in Che following amounts. TR 12936 TR 12938 TR 12939 TR 1290.3 Faithful Performance Bond: 5108,000 (139,600 f 85,000 5109,000 Labor and Material Bond: E 54,000 69,800 47,500 54,500 The developer, Marlborough Development Corporation, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreements. Copies of the Improvement Extension Agreements are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respe submitted, ~"-~ RHM: LB: w Attachments yv ImpExtAgmc cln aF wwcxo alc~wo111A IMMt0YE1B1T E7ITBISION A6REE>1BIT fOR TRACT 12936 - Street Improvements KNOH ALL NEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the Drovisions of the Subdivisfon Map Act of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a aunfcipal corporation, by and between the said City, hereinafter referred to as the City, and Marlborough Development Corporal referred to as the Developer. MITNESSETH: THAT, WHEREAS said Developer entered into an improvement agreement with the City as a requisite to issuance of Dutldings permits, and VHEREAS, said pevetaper desires an extension of time to coa4lete the krnm of the said improvement agreement. NOw, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by the City and by said Developer as follows: 1. The completion date of tht terms of the said improvement agreement is hereby extended by a Deriod of 12 months from the date of City Council approval of said agreement. 2. A11 other terms and conditions of the said improvement agreement shall remain the sass. As evidence of understanding the provisions contained herein, arld of intent to comply with sane, the Developer has affixed his signature Hereto: »wr»,t»~rrrrr»r»»-»-rrrr»»-»far»rrme»r»rr»»»»rrr#r*r»rm» CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIgNDA DEVELOPER CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation NAgS.B071O(1~J~P!ffiNT CORPORATION ey: ~ .. nn s ou ayor Pa~ ~ V Attest: C--~J __ every ut e e ty er Dated~~~ if ~~ 7 1~ MDTE: PD~II MISI Ie.owrtETto w ntI!'LIGTE AllO OErElOl6t'S SIYI~T61lE MIST t 110'iMIIED 4~ Imp EZtAgmt CITE OF pMCHD CI1CA11016I1 INPROYEIIBIT ElITE115I0N AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 12938 - Street Innrovements KNOM All MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement fs mace and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation, by and between the said Lity, hereinafter referred t0 as the City, and Marlborough Development Corporatic referred to as the Developer. YITIIESStlN: THAT, WHEREAS said Developer entered into an tnprovement agreement with the City as a reQuisite to issuance of Dulldings permits, and MHEREAS, said Developer desires an extension of time to complete the terms of the said improvement agreement. NON, THEREFORE, it 7s hereby agreed Dy the City and by said Developer as follows: 1. The comp let ton date of the terms of the Bald isprovement agreement is • hereby extended Dy a period of 12 alonths from the date of City Council approval of said agreement. Z. All other terms and conditions of the said ingrovement agreement shall remain the same. As evidence or understanding the provisions contained herein, and of intent to comply with same, the Developer has affixed his signature hereto: f M~Nf rr~f~~w~+htsrfr~r~~-#~-H~f efwrf ~M~ltMt~+if*rfrnh~r~,ev*~**rtrlrA~f~sR~~a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA OEYELOPER CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation 1y4RS;)~OR~dlGFI pE~LOPItENT CORPO:tATION Ry: ~ e0nts Ou , ayar Pau i. By~ V ce President ~ i v ~ - d Attest: ~-~~~~r~~"Tr Ti~a%~----• every u e et, ty eZT rc Dated:, • R07E: FOMI MIST E CalLETFD IA 1RIILICATE AND OEIELOIER'S SIGNATIRtE MIST E NDTARI~D 9~ ImpExt Aamt • CITY OF RANOIq t11UYld1611 IliN0YB61T F7IT191Sia1 A6REBIEIIT PoR Street Improvements - Tract 12939 KROY ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement fs mnde and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation, by and between the saie City, hereinafter referred to as the City, and Marlborough Development Coroorat i~ referred to as the Developer. YITNESSETN: THAT, YHEREAS said Developer entered into an ingrovemint agreement with the City as a requisite to issuance of Dutldings permlits, and YHEREAS, said Developer desires an extension of time to complete the terms of the said improvement agreement. NON, THEREFORE, tt is hereby agreed by the City and by said Developer as follows: 1. The caapletion date of the terms of the said inprovement agreement is • hereby extended by a Dertod of 12 months from the date of City Council approval of said agreement. 2. All other terms and conditions of the said inprovement agreement shall remato the same. As evidence of understanding the provisions contained herein, and of intent to comply with same, the Developer has affixed his signature hereto: fMlH}MN}ff HItfHHHlffHffMf,HfMfllftf ffffHfff Nfffff Hfftfflfff HH}H CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONW DEVELOPER CALIFORNIA, a municipal corooration CORPORATION BY: uenms L Stout, Mayor au ~e res~ attest: ~~ _ ` ~ ~ ~/1 ~ _2.,+-~ Dclores 0'B 'en, secret every ut a et, ty er Dated yL a<iL[ii~ ~ ~~P7 IM EDErEL01ER'S Ii11T1~E 1111TI1E~NQTMI~D 97 I mp ExtAgmt C17Y OF RANCHD CUGYIdl61 IwROrBeir EicTalstoll AsxEFreir FaR TRACT 12943 - Street Improvements u KNON ALL MFN BY TNESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Caiifornia, a municipal corporation, by and between the said City, hereinafter referred to as the City, and Harlborouah Development Corporati o: referred to as the Developer. YIIIIESSETY: THAT, YREREAS said Developer entered into an improvement agreement with the Cfty as a requf site to issuance of buildings penults, and YHEREAS, said Developer desires an extension of time to complete the terms of the safd improvement agreement. NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by the City and by said Developer as follows: 1. The cony letion date of the terms of the sa/d improvement agreement is hereby extended by a period of 12 months from the date of City Council approval of said agreement. 2. All other terms and conditions of the said improvement agreement shall remain the same. As evidence of understanding the Drovisions contained herein, and of intent to comp ty with same, the Developer has affixed his signature hereto: •wf i+vf~+w~~~tr#ew+~rt<f+,~f-f*fr`t1.Nf+w-e»~~vr+~*n.Mr~,tr*~HHe~f~IMwwr~,Mf ~dY» CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPER CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation _ By: enn s ou ayor Attest; every ut a et, ty er • CORP09ATI0\ e [~' ' / ~ Datea:(~~Gz;c% ' s J IIDTE: ill MIST E 00lLL7~ III 1DI1lIG1F AND DlrEL01a'S Si~7g1E IgSt E MDTARI2ED 9d .. ~ TR 12.938 r-.. ~~.r~__., '~V~/~. .. y ,, , ,-_. `' - c v~ r_- '--- E' ~. , ~ _ ~i5 ~ '~~ . ~l, ~ '- ~ ~. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGIIIEERIIdG DIVISION ,,;, ,~ /_ .. ~ . V l~ ~ ~~ ~~~` ~~~ ~~ r IMPROVEMENT uGp EE°E"~' I~1~ E%TENS IAN TITLE: ~~TRACTS 12935. 3°•. 39. a°; 9~ • RESOI UTION N0, p7-/78 A RESOLUTIQI OF 7HE CITY COGNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNG4, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT ExTENSION AGREEMENTS ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR TRACTS 12936, 12938, 12939 AND 12943 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, C al ifornf a, has for its consideration improvement Eztensi or. Agreements ^xe toted on March 20, 1987, by Marlborough Development Corporation as developer, For the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property spec if icai ly described therein, and generally located in the Car yn Planned Community; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subJ ect Co the terms thereof, is to be done in condunction with the development of said Tracts 12936, 12938, 12939, and 12943; and WHEREAS, said improvement Extension Agreements are secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Securities, which is identified in said Improvement ExtenSf on Agreenents. • NON, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cuc amanga, California, that said Improvement Extension Agreements and said Improvement Securf ties be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Extension Agreements on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ~QO - CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONGA c~US+ok„ • STAFF REPORT ~.;, ''~~~. • OATS: April 15, 1987 T0: Lfty Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, Cfty Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician } c F F L Z .. > 19- SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Extension Agreement for Parcel Map 8815 located an the west side of Beryl Avenue, south of 19th Street, submitted by Citation Hanes aEOO««EMana It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subJect extension agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ', ANALYSIS/BACKCAOUNO Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements for Parcel Map 8815 were approved by the City Council an September 4, 1985, in tM fnllnrron ,m„~.~r~ faithful Performance Band: f1,546.00 Labor and Material Bond: f3,173.00 The developer, Citation Hanes, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Extension Agreement are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectf submitted, R ;tB;,ih Attachments /D/ clTr aF roularo aulloNSA IMPAOVOENT AfiREEIEIIT EXTEIISiCI1 FOR PARCEL M1P 8815 KNOW ALL MEN OY THESE PRESENTS; That this agreenent is made and entered into, in conformance with the provisions Of the Subdivision Map Act Of the City of Rancho Cucaaonga, California, a municipal corporation, by and between the said City, hereinafter referred to as the ..ity, and Citation Builders referred to as the Developer. nT1~ssETi1: • C_J THAI, WNEAEAS said Developer entered into an Improvement agreenent with the C1ty as a requisite to issuance of but ldl ngs permits, and WHEREAS, said Developer desires an extension of time to carpi ete the terms of the said lmprovemmt agretmenL. ROW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by the C1ty and by said Developer as fol lays: 1. The completion date of the terms of the said improvement agreement is hereby extended by a Deriad oP 12 months fray the date of City Council approval of said agreement. 2. Ail other terms and conditions of the said improvement agreement shall remain the sane. As crlJen:.e ui uncernanding the provisions contained herein, and of intent to comply with sane, the Developer has affixed h15 signature hereto: •++w.~:,r~~Mww~.~w~w~r~itita.artr-*M*+rae+f++~~nenr~+rw~,~:+:***~e+»n,r~s~r~~•i~~ CITY OF RA.NCMO CUCAH0116A CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation 8Y: ern s L out, ayor DEVELOPER CITATION HOMES, a partnership Attest: Ev: - ~,` ' , .~ G. Linton, 3r. Developmer.£ Manager-50. Divisio ver Y Authe et, ty er By: CITATIOtd 9UILDERS,a partnership NOTE: Fptll KIST NE CpPIETED IN TRIPLIGTE AND OEY0.0PfR'S 516NATURE MBST NE NDfARIZED 3/19/87 /01 0 2 z Q ,, 1 I~ f ~~ ~ a ~ i ~: ~~ H.; ..y ~3 ¢q~ 3HN3~tl tl3153H00N '~~I ii ~ ,~, Iii! \\~ Wj ~, ~• YC- _ ,i 111' ~`' ~ •~ ~'lll~ ~ i 39M3 '~ N ~~, ,; i Y~ . ~Y i~ '1 ii h :~ ' t:. Q 'Il ~~ W H t^ • U U ~ O U X03 RESOL UT[ON N0. 1f /~/79 • A RESOLUTION !1F THE CITY CODICIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMpiGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEIENT SECURITY fOR PARCEL MAP 8815 MHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for fts consideration an Improvement Extension Agreement executed an Marth 27, 1987, by Citation Homes as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adiacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the west side of Beryl Avenue, south of 19th Street, submitted by Citation Manes; and MHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and suWect to the terms thereof, is to be done fn cordunction with the development of said Parcel Map 8815; and MHEREAS, said Improvement Extension Agreement is secured and accompanfed by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Extension Agreement. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Extension Agreement and said Improvement Security he and the sane are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Extension Agreement on behalf of • the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Cierk to attest thereto. ~ ~~~ loy ! 1 U • --CITY OFR2.VCH0CCCA~IOSGa `~~a~ip4 STAFF REPORT ;,° 1 ~~_ A: : ~ ;~ic«= 04 TE: April 15, 1987 = 3 _~, i T0: City Council and City Manager _.. ---- - ' r~ _ I FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 8Y; Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUB dECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Parcel Map 10185 located on the southwest corner at Highland and Mil iken Avenues submitted by The William Lyon Company. RECOMMENd1TI0N It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 10185, acce Dting the subject agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and Ctty Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. ANA LYS [S /BACKGROIN D Parcel Map 10185 located on the southwest corner of Highland and Milliken Avenues, in the Victoria Planned Community, was approved by the Planning Cmmissi on on November 12th, for the division of 36,6 acres into 2 parcels. The Developer, The William Lyon Canpany, is submitting an agreement and security to quay antee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: 5606,000 Labor and Material Bond: 5303,000 ~opies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga County 'A at er District. Respec ly submitted, ~/ , ~lsrer-~ 1 L3:jh 4 ttachments / O S' ^"` ".~+ w..., tIG~Ld NUJ AU ENL'c' -~-~~s - ,.,o. . •1~- ~ ,. v ~~ • - -- ~ it - _ i -.~' r_ ! ~a . ! ° ~ 1 i i ~ ^ j ~~ ~ nm i ~w ` ~ ~ 22 1 . ~ ~ M ¢ =.r. ~ w r ~ .k i; - ,,~ ~~\~ S - ~~ Y'.. VCMY AW _- G Tf~s~i_ PCOCEL MAP !plc5 ' 71TL~: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~"~ ENG~IIQ(i DM9ION /06 CITT OF IWICHO CUCAM01611 . IMPROVEMENT A1itEEMENT FOR PARCEL MAP 10185 IQiDN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municip5l 'corporation, hereinafter referred to as the City, by and between said City and The William Lyon Company hereinafter referred to as the Developer. THAT, WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain real property in said City totaled on the southwest corner of Highland and Milliken Avenues and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to De met by said Developer as prerequisite to granting of final approval; and NHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to 6e equivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the purpose of securing said approval. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at developer's ezpense all • improvements described on page 4 hereof within 12 months from the date hereof, 2. This agreement shall be effective on the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement. This agreement Shall 6e in default on the day following the first anni vers arv date of coin .~~~~.._1 ,.~~~ ~ ;n aetmuiun ui tine nos Deen granted by said City as hereinafter provided. 3, The Developer may request additional time in which to complete the provisions of this agreement, in writing not less than 30 days prior to the default date, and includfng a statement of circumstances of necessity for additional time. In cansideratton of such request, the City reserves the right to review the provisions hereof, includfng construction standards, cost estimate, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to require adj ustmen is thereto when warranted by substantial changes therein. 4. [f the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shalt have the right at any time to cause said provisions to be cmmpleted by any lawful means, and thereupon to recover from said Developer and/or his Surety the full cost and expense incurred in so d0ing 5, Construction permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of any work within the public right-af-way, and the developer shall conduct such work it full compliance .~ with the regulations contained therein. Non-compliance may result in stopping of the work by the Cfty, and assessment of the penalties provided. 8540 Fr<hi bald Ave, Ste. B Aan cho Cucamonga, CA 91730 /0 7 6. Public right-of-wr4y improvement work required shall be constructed in . corMonnance with approved improvement plans, Standard Specifications, and Standard Drawings and any special amendnents thereto. Construction shall include any transitions and/or other incidental work deemed necessary for drainage or public safety. Errors or ommissions discovered during construc- tion shall be corrected upon the direction of the Lity Engineer. Revised work due to said plan modifications shall be covered by the pravfsions of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original planned works. 7. Nork done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to complete any and alt work in the event of unJustified delay in completion, and to recover all cost and expense incurred from the Developer and/or his contractor by any lawful means. 8. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocations, or removal of any componerd of any irrigation water system in conflict with the rewired work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner Of the water system. 9. The Developer shall be responsible for renoval of all loose rock and other debris from the public right-of-way. 10. The Developer shall plant and maintain parkwsy trees as directed by the Community Development Director. 11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to • guarantee completion of the terms of this agreement shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney, The principal amount of said fmprovement security shall not be less than the amount shown: • ~v 8 FAITIFUL PERfORMANCE Type: Principal Amount: (606,000 The .4meri can Insurance Company None and address of surety: 17542 E 17th Sc. Tustin, [A 92680 MTERIAI AND lABOA Type' The American nsuianceAto~any (303,000 Nave and address of surety: 17542 E 17th se. Tustin, CA 92680 CASH DEPOSIT MDIIUENTATIOII Type' The AmerfcanP lnsuiSnce Company f 1,350 Nave and address of surety: 17542E 17th St. Tustin, CA 92680 TO BE POSTED PR10R TO ACCEPTMCE BY THE CITY IN YITN ESS IffREOF, the parties here~~~ooo have /caused these Dresents to be duly executed and acknowledge rrt,fh all/9t~mayf des required by lmv on the dates set forth opposite their si atur 1({,'~ ~ / Developer ident Date March 20, 1987 Developer Steven Ford Assistant Secretary n me Y~ Accepted: Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga, California A Municipal Corporation BY: Mayor Attest: ty er Approved: 1 y t orney OEYELOPER'S SI9IATURES MUST BE NOiARiZED AND COlPLETED 1N TRIPLIGTE 3 X09 cm aF RANamo awa4Y1 ENGINEERDI6 DIYISIDI E1ICRMCNMEMT PEAIQT FEE SdEBILE . Locat Date: File • NDFE: Does not iMluek torrent fee for writing permit a' pavemmnt deposi ts QUANTITY UNIT ITEM PRICE gM0U17 L.f. P.C.C. curb - 8• C.F. 48" gutter g 00 L.F. P.C.C. curb - 8" C.F. 24" gutter • 6 00 L.F. P•C.C. curb only 8" C.F. (Median) . 5 50 L.F. A.C. berm . 4 50 S.F. 4" P.C.C. sidewalk . 1 75 S.F. Drive approach . p r~ S.f. 8" P.C.C. cross gutter (inc. curb) • 3 40 C.Y. Street excavation . 1 50 L.F. S F . P.C.C. curb 8" C.F. w/24" to 48" gutter 7.50 5• • . . A.C. over 6 A.B. 1 10 S.F. 4" A.C. over 4" q•B. . 96 EA. Handicap rasp • 100 EA. End of street pavement, std, 405 • 400 00 EA. Remove and aP street pavement . 200 00 EA. Adjust sewer manhole to grade ~. . 250 00 EA. Ay ust water valves to grade . 75 Op EA. Street tights , 1000 L.F. Barricades (intersec. 5500 min) • 500 00 L.F. Z z 4" redwood header . 1 75 S.F. Removal of A.C. pavement . 0 35 EA. ~" Street 51gns . Z00 DD L.F. nei ieciors and posts A.C. ditch apron ;5.OD L.F. Gunite interceptor ditch, std. 815 1.50 4 00 L.F. Gunite ditch and inlet Structure . 15 00 L.F. Temporary cmcrete drainage ditch . 7 50 -~- , 29 00 L.F. -T T4• RCP (1500 D) . 35 00 L.F. ~- 48• CMP inlet riser . l ~ EA. - Flared pipe end with rip rap pp,0 p ~ EA. Catch basin N - 8' P900•00 Continued on next page Page 1 of 2 (/ O QUANTITY UNIT ITEM PRICE AMOUNT 2 EA. - Brick and mortar plug 200.00 400 ~ L.F. - Concrete encasement 25.00 -1-IYS- ~ EA. - Local depression 12' 1000.00 -2`006- ~ L F. - - Junction structure (N.H. "A" std.510) 5000.00 ~- ) 4Ob L.F. ~" Earth channel 200.00 ~/~ T EA. - - Outlet structure, Std /507 500.00 ~8- ~ Lunp Sum - Sand blasting 40.00 ~l1iT ~ZI9 L.F. - - ' 4" solid paint stripe 1.00 -d-Ir~ 7rf1 7 L.F. - 4" dash paint stripe .50 ~8.ria~ ` L.F. ~ J- 8" solfd paint stripe 1.50 -2' 65r '~ EA. - painted traffic arroN 25.00 ~~ ~ EA. - - Painted stop and stop bar 100.00 ~- 79 L.F. Sawcut 2.00 -I3&- ENGINEERING INSPECTION FEE S24 B65 SUB TOTAL ` - 5549 376 ' •RESTORATION/DELINEATION CASH "S; 000- COIITINGENCY COSTS (lOL) ~5 ~938- OEPOSiT (REFUNDABLE) FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BQ10 (100%) ~Calf- MOIIUENTATIp1 SURETY (CASH) 1,350 LABOR AND IMTERIAL BOiD (50X) ~Pursuaot to City of Rand~o Cucaoonga Ihntctpal Code, T1tle I, Chapter 1.OB, adopting Sa~ . Bernardino Caonty Code Titles, Chapters 1-5, a cash restorrtloNdeitneatiae deposit sMl Ee made prior to issuance of an Engineering Coiwtructtan pewit. Revised 3/84 • 2 of 2 /// CITY OF RANCHO pICAM01fiA eord No. '11 1577 FAITHFUL PERFOINKICE 8010 premium: 53,636.oc NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of . California, and The Killian Lyon Canpany (hereinafter designated as "principal") have entered into an agreement whereby princlpal agrees to install and complete certain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated 198_, and identified as protect Parcel Map rs re y re erre to an made a Dart hereof; and, NHE REAS, said principal 15 required under the terms of said agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said agreement. NON, THEREFORE, we the principal and The rimer can insurance Com an as surety, are held and firmly bound un o t rty o anc o ucamonga (hereinafter called 'City"), in the penal sum of Six hundred and six thousand Dollars (5606,000) lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sun welt and truly to be made, ne Dind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, ,)ointly and severally, firmly by these presents. u The condition of this obligation is such that if the above hounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in alt things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and pefform the covenants, conditions and provisions in the said agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and to all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall became null and vofd; atherwlse, it shall be and remain in full farce and effect. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be fncluded costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully eM•orcing such obligation, ail to be taxed as costs and included ,,, _ y ~nA,mont rwndered. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the sane shall in anywise affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications. IN NITNESS KHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the principal and surety aDOVe named, an March za `, 198 7 THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY urety ~ )+ -(1~L orney- n- ac patricla Brebn ~`.~ ATTOIMEY TO ALL 801DS BE NOTARI2ED MUST BE COPLETEO IN TRIPLIGTE //d eor.d No. 713 16'7 CITY DF RANCHO CIICAMDM6A Premium included ir, charge for LABOR AMD N17ERIALMEN 9010 Performance Wna WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, and The William Lyon Lompany (hereinafter designated as • "principal") have entered into an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated 198 and identified as prop ect Parcel Map is re y re erre to and m~a part hereof; and WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is required before entering upon the performance of the work, to file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Rancho Cucamonga to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as a corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material men and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure in the sun of Three hundred and three thousand Dollars (f303, 000), for materials furnished or labor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unanployment insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that said surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth, and aiso in case suit is brought upon this bond will pay in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, inciuding reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in suctessfully enforcing such obligation, to 6e awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to be included in the judgment therein rendered, It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall inure to • the benefit of any and all persons, companies and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Oivison 3 df the Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this band. .~.hJ ulu L'ne condition of tM s bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall became null and void, otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect, The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of said agreement or the specifications accompanying the sane shalt in any manner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration or addition. 1N WTTNES$ IrtIEREOF, this instrument has beer. duly executed by the principal and surety //above named, on March 2a 198 ~ T_he-lyiliiem LVOn ~C~mpan~ ~~^ 1'FIE AMERICAN INS^RANCS COMPANY 1 eve aper. ~ ( ure~£y~'-- Ure LLOrney-ln-Y dct Patricia Brehner James F. Baile;i, Vice Pre ~`iden[ • `PLEASE ATTAdI POk£R OF ATTOINEY TO ALL RONOS SI9IATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED MUST RE NMPLETED IN TRIPIIGTE // 3 sueotrtsla 61NRANTEE NO PERFORMMCE (SETTDIG OF FINAL MDNUENTS) • City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Gentlemen: Pursuant to Chapter 4, Article 9, Section 66497 of the Government Lode, the undersigned hereby agrees that all monuments shown on the final map of Parcel Map 10185 are to be set and furnished by the subdividers engineer or surveyor on or before May 1988, as specified in the Engineer's or Surveyor's Certificate and agrees to furnish the rrotes thereon to complete all engineering requirements specified in Section 66497, of the Government Code. The undersigned hands you herewith the sun of 51,350 (Receipt No. ) as a cash deposit, said deposit to guarantee that the monuments will~e set and the notes furnfshed as above provided on or before the date specified and that the engineer or surveyor w111 be paid Dy the undersigned. It is further understood and agreed that in the event the undersigned fails to complete the above requirements witRin the time specified, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Ts authors and to complete said requirements or cause them to De completed and the cost thereof 1s to be a charge against said cash deposit, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to make the necessary transfer from said cash deposit to the credit for the proper city fund. • It is further agreed that if the undersigned does not present evidence to the City Council that he has paid the engineer or surveyor for the setting of the final monuments, and if the engineer or surveyor gives the notices prescribed in Section 66497 of the Government Code, the City shall pay to said engineer or surveyor, the cash Arrocir haratn m.do If the cost of completing said requirements exceeds the amount of the cash deposit, the undersigned agrees to pay the difference wTthfn thirty (30J days after receiving written statement from the City of Rancho Cucamonga specifying the amount of the difference between the cash deposit and the actual cost of said requirements. ~, Cordially, S aturer. ~ Title /~( s, ~. i ey, V' c President Date ~ i The de positer of record (for net ur~y portion of the cash deposit) shall be Name Address NOTE: TO 8E SDDNITTED FULLT FIlLEO OUi ANO 5191ED IN TNIPLigTE // c/ cEire:AL RDwu of A^°R'~+' 77~ AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY IItIOW ALL MEN tY TIfFaE PRtlLNiS: TAU THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY. a Corporatmn duly ermmud and eusunl urger Ihr hws of sAs Sou o/ New IeruY• and lurirm iu pnndal olBee in the Cur aM [oumy W San Fualuo. CMfornn. has made. comomsed and appdmed. aM dm by Neu prcunts make. ceMlnute aM appmns -----PA7RICIA BRF9NER--___ • ks true an0 4w/ul Attameyls}in-Fxt, with IuB power aM awhauy MreDY cafened in ns name. Dlaee aM Head. to eamme. ual. ackaw led{e and drlrvn anY aM all bonds uMertakmP• rxapurances or mhtt wrinen obhptxms m the nature thereof ____________________ _______ and to Alpd the C anon IherebY as full) and so the lime enms as i/ such bonds wen ssPM 6Y sM Reddens. waled wnh IM corpmam ual of the Corponsmn aed duly anntN 6Y ns SecresarY. hereby rnApN arq canhrmrry all rAal IAe uq AltarneYls FimFur maY do In Ihr premlus Thn power of moray n Qansed pursuat to Muk VIII. Sxtmn b and 11 d RY-kws of THE AMERICAN INSCRANCE COMPANY au in full /ae<aM Mect. "Arsine VIII, ApPWatmmeaW AaNen'ry Aarimufinercmrim, aW AttwaY-u-Fxrasd AlmD ro acrepr Le1a/ Prows aod.Nake Appmrmm. SKtioa NI, Appeirtmmr. lb C\svaeu of s1e bud of DiscYOn, We Praaldees, apy Via-PrafMml a aoY otbn person aalhoriaed hY the Board of Dlmora, she ChavmP of sb bud of OtruYOm. rM Prmideat u any VicwPmgenl, maY. from time m time, appoMS Rmsdmr Amutml Sareurus W Mlemrys•u•Fxt m reprvnl aad art Im aad a AeMtf of Me CorponWp and Almu to accept kmn proms and make aDpnrancrs lar and an Mall of Me Corpentia. Section ll. bMwiry. The Aumonty of aoch Rmidmr Aukunl Srneurin. Auarveys-in-Foes, apd Almrr Mnl he a DrncrlAed in the m0rvmml ergmtlq Wev appoiaum4 aad aY aad appoutmmr aW W avMOreY {rated 1herMy may D<revole0 as mY lime by the tab o1 Dirmors or by ay aaswa spowpW le male axh appemuP}•• Tlsn po er of moray is sl~ple~~ and waled under aM by Me alAentY M the lollowia Resolution adorned by sAe Board o1 Dlralms of THE AMERICAN INSURANCE [OM-ANV at a mubry dWy Wkd arq held on the :tlh day of $mmmber. 19A6. and uq Resolubon Ms nos been amende0 or rrpeakd: "RESOLVED. IMt the uPnure d any Vke-Pmidms. Am+um SxmnY ~ and Rnidem Auknm SxrtuO of IInY Corponsson. aM IA[ ual of IAn Corpmamn may b<a111aN w pnmN on any poa'u of usomeY, on ay r<ranion of any power of aemaY~ a ql mY « nrMate rclaulq sherno. hY /xslmik. aml any power of mtome). Py rtraasmn of ay power d attorney. a crosBnte beano such /xomlk smature p Ixslmik ual shall he .ahd and bintlsN upa Ihr Cmporatmn." IN WITNESS WHEREOF. 711E AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY Ms causN 1MU prelims so be nlrled AY in Vue-Prtsrdenl. arq mcarpouu sdmbe hereumo arlixed this 26th day of September 19 83 THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY • ~~ b BY wr Yni alwl a Vr lwLVtMrIA. m. CT'ANDCOCNTY OF SANfLANCL4C0 777 on tun 262` da-of September 83 Richard Nilliams y 19 _ , before me anonnly came la ma known, who. Arm{ by me duly sworn, did depou and say: shat Ac is Vue•Pragml or THE AMERICAN INSL RANCE COn1PA~1. :he Cur. porabon deuribed in and uMch executed the above mnrummG Ihal h< knots the ual of wd Corporaoon: IAaI Ihr teal aferN to the aid imvumenl is such torporme ual: Ihal n was so aleaN by mdtt of the bud of Dommrs of stud Corporaoon and Ihal he g{nM Ns name IAerno by h4<order IN WITNESS WHEREOF. I have hercumo sn mY AaM and alAaed mY ofkpal ual. she day arq yen Mrmn Rru about wnuen OFFICIAL SEAL ws~1EIIp~1.[wue~t D~i ta.n ai fr MY Commnnan hP.n loot 1/, 1Na STATE Of CALII'ORNIA. L'fTY ANDCOLTTY Oi SAN iAANCLSCO ~ u, ~~ cERnnu7E I. me undersl{ned, Rngens Assisum Secrnary of THE AMERICAN INSI:RANCE COMPANY, a NEN /ERSEY Corpoaoon. DO HEREBY CER TIFY tun me lorgoin{ and atucAed pOW ER OF ATTORNEY remains in full force antl has nol been •m oAN: and furthermore :nn Lmle YIII. Sr,. worn ]0 and ]I of the Bylaws of the Corporaoon. and IAr Rmolubon of the Bwrd of Dnenon, cal forth m the Power of Almrnry, arc no• in lane Si{ned and caned u;Ae Cny and Caunly Of San Franauo Deed the 24th day of _MaYCh 19 9~ ..~jj ~°. ~~ SA~~1 hngmi ,~s«rC~e +e - 1tpT1-TA31Y ~~ ~ RESOLUTION N0. I7-yd~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 7HE CITY OF PgNCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PgRCEL M1P N0. 10185, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 10185), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No, 10185, submitted by the William Lyon Company, Subdivider, and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the southwest corner of Highland and Milliken Avenues, being a division of a portion of the northeast 1/4 of Section 36, Township 1 North, Range 7 West, and a portion of the northwest i/4 of Section 31, Township 1 North, Range 6 West of the San Bernardino Meridian, was approved by the Planning Commission as provided in the State Subdivision Map Act and is in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 10185 is the Final Map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map, Said subdivider submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NON, THEREFORE, BE I7 RESOLVED by th@ ,City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: • 1. That the offers for dedication and the Final Mao delineating sane tx approved and the City Clerk is out hors zed to execute the certificate thereon behalf of said Cfty; and 2. chat said Parcel Map No. 10185 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present sane to the County Recorder to be filed for record. ~/ L - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~ STAFF REPORT -~' ~ ~, xis -- DATE: April 15, 1987 ~I ~ z T0: City Council and City Manager - - > 19'- FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Release of Agreements for Postponellent of CCdR's for Tract 13059, located north of Baseline and east i of Deer Creek Channel in Victoria Planned Community Reoaf>EMBATIa: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Revocation, Release, Satisfaction and Cancel anon of Agreenent for Tract 13D59, authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause saae to record Background/Analysts • On August 6, 1986, the City Council entered into an agreement for the postponement of CCLR's for Tract 13059, said agreement was recorded on August 13, 1986, Document No. 86-230698, Official Records of San Bernardino County, California. CC&R's have been approved by the City Attorney for Victoria Droves Five, the buyers of Tract 13059. CC6R's were retarded an February 13. 1987. ac Mrimnn~ w_ 8, ~~~~±~ G; fig{ai Kecoras of San Bernardino County, California. The recording of the CC6R's meets all conditions of the agreement recorded on July 1, 1986. Re, uhmitted, S:L //7 RECORDED REOUESTEO DY AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN T0: City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga REVOGTICN, RELEASE, SATISfACTipI AND CANCELLATION OF ADREEMENT THIS REVOGTICN, RELEASE, SATISFACTION AND CANCELLATION OF AGREEMENT is entered into this 2Oth day of 'iarch, 19_J and is to be effective that date, regardless of tmT-d"ate of exec~on hereof, and is by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (hereinafter sometimes referred to as 'City') and Victoria Groves Five, (hereinafter sometimes referred to as 'Developer'). WHEREAS, City and Developer entered into an: agreement dated July 7, 1986, recorded as documront No. 86-230698 on August~l3, 1986, Official Records • of San Bernardino County, Calffornla ("Agreement'), which was to provide assurance to the City that rp budding permit for a work of improvement would be issued and no permanent utility hookups could be made therefor on the PraJect constructed on Tract 13059 until the set of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions ("CCLR's•) acceptable to the City had been reviewed and recorded; and WHEREAS, Developer is the owner and developer of the Protect described Sn the Agreement; and WHEREAS, a set of CCYN s for the work of 7ngrovement on Tract 13059 has been reviewed and approved by the Ctty and was recorded on February 13, 1987, as Document No. 87-049275, Official Records of San Bernardino County, Cal ifornta; and WHEREAS, the Agreement provides in paragraph 3 thereof that once CC6R's are satisfactory to and approved Dy City and have been recorded, City and Developer o- its successor in interest shall execute and record a document declaring that the conditions have been satisfied and that the A9reanent is null, void, cancelled, satisfied and of no further farce and effect; and NHEREAS, all conditions precedent to the Agreement or its can cell at ton have been met; 1467 Nor[h Wanda, Ste. I55 Orange, CA 92667 ~~ NON, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. That certain Agreement dated July 7, 1981, recorded as document • No. B6-230698 on August 13, 1986 Official Records of San Bernardino County, California, is hereby and shall be henceforth null, void, cancelled, released and of no further force and effect and City hereby declares that all of the conditions hereof have been satisfied by Developer. 2. The CC&R's for the Project constructed on Tract 13059 will and have replaced the Agreement in its entirety. HHEREFORE, this Agreement is executed the day and year first above written. RE?UELIC DI;VELOP`L.S'"_' CO DEVELOPER CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY l~ BY• 'oh. e ~ rtu ,,''ViZ. _ >tlent/ ;enl. ~'ar, ayar y 0 9Y Rancho Cucamonga Ted l,. !'opver; Assistant Secretary cnI *' !'Tee i?~s°_ ~ ATTEST: Ev .,, 1 aoe~i>.-Vice Prr~ident • BY ~lc~ ~I .Ce y F e y o Earle G. Tlmf Vice president RanChO Cucamonga STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On 1987, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in an or sa oun y and State, Dersonally appeared and ,proved to me on the bests of satisfac ory e~'vi'~ce~o be t persons w executed this instrument as Mayor and City Cierk, respectively, of the City of Rantho Cucamonga, and acknowledged to me that the Lily of Rancho Cucamonga executed it. MITNESS my hand and official seal. 0 ory c 2 /i9 RESauTIa no. 87-/~'~ • A RE50.HTICN OF THE CITY COINCTL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING AN AGREEI~NT FOR POSTPOiIEMENT OF APPROVAL OF CC6R'S FOR TRACT 13059 NNEREAS, to meet the requirements, as a prerequisite to approval of building permits for Tract 13059, the subdivider of said tract, The Killian Lyon Canpany, entered into an Agreanent for Postponaaent of CCbR's. MHEREAS, said requirements have been met by the reordatton of CC6R's, document No. 87-049275, recorded in San Bernardino County, California the current developer, Victoria Groves Five, submited a Revocation, Release, Satisfaction and Cancelation of Agreement for approval and execution 6y said City. ROM, TMEREi011E, BE 1T RES0.YE0 by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califnrnia as follows: 1. That said agreement be and the same is approved and the Nayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto and cause same to be recordtd upon said execution. /~ O • CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 15, 1981 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Cathy Becker, Public Norks Inspector SOB.7ECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Canpletion RECOMIENC11TI01: ~t ~`U ~~ ~.'`_ > ~ i- ~ z IV'- The required street improvements for Tract 13131 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that CSty Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of f17,250.00, authorize the City Engineer to ffle a Notice of CanDletion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond fn the amount of f172,500.00. Background/Analysis Tract 13131 -Located on the Northeast corner of Arrow Route and Vineyard Avenue DEVELOPER: Robertson Hanes •VVN VVVICy UI IYC, iLC. 1VL Colton, CA 92324 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) f17,2250.00 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) f172,500.00 Respectful submitted, RHM: CB:Jh /~ / L. _J RESauria no. 87-/8~- A RESOLUIICN Of THE C[TY COLNCIL OF THE C[TY OF RANCHO CUfAMON64, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IWROVEN['NTS FOR TPACT 13131 ANO AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF C014LETIa FOR THE NORK • NHEREAS, the construction of publ7c improvements for Tract 13131 have been completed to the sattsfactian of the City Engineer; and MHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, Certifying the work canplete. NON, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Motice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino Lounty. /~?~ . RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 WHEN RECORDED MOIL T0: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCIIMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION nOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEn THAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature oP which interest or estate is: Tract 13131 • 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCNGA, 9320-C Base Ltne Road, P. 0. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 3. On the 15th day of April, 1987 there was completed on the hereinafter described real property the work of Tmnrn„amen. ~,.. e.._.~ , contract Documents for: ~'-"'-"- ""~ """ "' `~` Tract 13131 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was; Robertson Homes 5. The real property referred to hereto is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of son Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: Northeast corner of Arrow Route and Vineyard Avenue CITY OF RANCHO CUCgMCNGA, a municfpai corporation, Owner a e usse agu re City Engineer ~a 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT BATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT April 15, 1987 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Cathy Becker, Public Works Inspector Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion REC01lENDATION: t;- x,l f F ~ 2 _ ~ 19"' I The rewired street improvements for Tract 11625 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of f42,530, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond to the anount of 5425,300. Background/Analysfs Tract 11625 - located on a portion of Hermosa Avenue between 19th Street and Highland Avenue. DEVELOPER: Roy E. Daly Construction Corporation 93.m Aac• I ina anaA c~~~~a Ana Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Accept: Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 542,530 Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 5425,300 Res pectfu ubmitted, c RHM: LB:d w /d y . RESOLUTION N0. grl'l83 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CODICIL OF THE CITY GF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IIPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 11625 ANO AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF CONPLETlOI FOR THE MORK MHEREAS, the construction of public improvements far Tract 11625 have been camel eted td the satisfaction of the Ctty Engineer; and MHEREAS, a Notlce of Completion Ts rewired to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOM, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a kotice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. /~ ~~ • RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 MHEN RECORDED MIL T0: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUfAMOMGA P. 0. Boz 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE iS HEREBY GIVEN TMT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate i s: Tract 11625 • 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUGMQIGA, 9320-C Base Line Road, P. 0. Box 801, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 3. On the 15th day of April, 1987, there was completed on the hnr•ninafl n~ doe~N F_eA al ,...~.. •G_ ^__. ter:«"~.r ",.. ,.~; ,: of i6,y,'ur AumiL ael iur•i ii in [he contract documents for: Tract 11625 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was: Roy E. Daly Construction Corporation 5. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardfno, California, and is described as follows: A portion of Hermosa Avenue between 19th Street and Highland Avenue. The street address of said property is CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, Owner Date Russell H. Maguire City Engineer /.>? 4 STAFF REPORT ~ ~. ~;~-\ GATE: April 15, 1987 ~~' t- T0: City Council and City Manager 19" FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Cathy Becker, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion AECOMMENMTI01: u The required street improvements for Tract 11428 have been campieted 1n an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond fn the amount of (0,500.00, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 570,000.00. Background/gnalysts Tract 11428 - Located on the East side Of Center Avenue and South of Church Street. DEVELOPER: Data Dest~ 7925 Center Avenue liw ~~.A r. n. Yu.. W..V llyp, yf1 >L/JU Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) f0, 500.00 Release: Fa1tMu1 Performance Bond (Street) f70,000.00 Respec y submitted, RHM CB:]h "i /d7 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMhIGq P. 0. Box 801 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NHEN RECORDED M4IL T0: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDRf{f P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIYEN TWIT: hereinafter destribedrrea~ledrosrt othe nature ofnwhichtinterestatoriestate is: p ~ y' Tract 11428 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF PANCMO CUC4MgNG4, 9320-C Base Line Road, P. 0. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91130. 3. On the 15th day of April, 1987 there was completed on the hereinafter described real property the work of improvement car forth :n thn i.Jnii a~L uu~umencs tor: ..._ Tract 11428 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was: Data Design 5. The real praperiy referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and fs described as follows: East side of Center Avenue and South of Church Street ate CITY of RANCHO CUCAMONGq, a municipal corporation, Owner usse agu re City Engineer /d 8 RESOLUTIQi N0. p7-/8`I A RES0LUTI01 OF Tiff CITY COUNCIL OF THE CTtt OF RANCHO CUCANdifA, GLIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC INPROVE1wENT5 FOR TRACT 11428 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE MORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for * have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and MHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is rewired to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, be it resoived, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized t0 sign and ffle a Notice of Completion wfth the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. -, J ias ~. 1$~;~~~ The Insco/Dico Group DIOp n.~tsTE~a~ce eo:vn HD~D ~o: loz~zs PRE \IfC')1: ~< Nil P~ LI GY.:: I\ YE kF ~hC ,4 'r by\: fC.COR' ALL )IE\~ R5' THESE PRESESTS: THAT u'e, DATA DESIGN LABORATORIES .a>prinupai. and DE1'ELOPER3 I\,y'CR.A\CE COSIPA\\', a corporeuon organaed and doing hu.iine s; unrier ant! by [ imie of the lawe of the Stare of California and duly licensed to conduct surer business in the Mare of 1-alifmnia, a: surety. are held and fumy' bound unto CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA as Obligee m the sum ofTHREE THOUSANC FIVE HUNDAED NO/100 iS x.500.00 Dollar. for which pay'men4 well and truly to be made. we bind ourselves. our heirs, executor and successors. 7oindy and severally' firmly by these presents • THE CO\DITIOS OF THE OBLIG.iTIO\ IS SCCH THAT: • R'HF,RE.4S. the shove named Princtpal entered inro an agreement or agreements with said Obiaee •n. TRACT 11428 R'HE REAa. :aid agreement provided that Principal shall guarantee replacement end repair of imprrn emenr as described therein for a period of one year [ollowing final acceptance of said improvements \'011', THEREFORE. d the above Principal shall indemnif}'the Ohligee far a!I los that Ohligee may •usrnin he reaann of an. defective materials or workmanship which become apparent during ;he oerind of one year from and after acceptance of the said improvements by Obligee, then this obligation shall he eoid. othervase ro remain m full force aim ettFrc I\' R'IT\ES$ IVHEREOF, the sealend signature of said Principal is hereto aftixed and [he rorpnrate -tai and the name -d the said Surely' is hereto affixed and attested he its duly authorized dtmrnes~itr Fa,t thr 3rd day of eF.•tt _.I96•~ . .iK ' t DECELOPERS fVSCR.iYC F. COStFA\} B1 uaV1tl C. B3n£er - , ,, .F,,. . n Nilahrte ire Anaarvn, 1'\'L^il -IL ~~MICI /:So POWER OF ATTORNEY OF N°. 019791 INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA AND OEVELOPEg3 INSURANCE COMPANY P,O. BOX D5n3. ANAHEIM, CALIF. 9t Wt • OtA19EY-lgl NpTCE. 1. xl powr x+tl.tlpwnY MrYn 9rMYY NW p my YRnI IYmIIW. on M 1tY My a McaneY. tY) • 2 Tni.P rd Anonyr ~. wan YMlOwil Yry POroon nwrW. .1 TnM PgwdAtlarnry i. Yae uMA•MMIUIrrW.MbxnM ErmT p..MpNbM x.In du. hM Yapb nga.bMnn xM, . Tno ROYxaxp.my WVa mi GrYUrMe!o lr AllgMNx-In-F.c1.wt.MUa r.mYn. rrm.md p.nd MOapw.rraM_ KNOW ALL YEN By *NESE PREEENT9. Mt rrpl u rplray Nmnr, IMDWNRY COYMYr w CAMIOYNA Ya oEYELONM IMEYAANCE GOYMNY, eP rcn rYrrYq'. an zl;PwR', IwwY mA.•, rnrdl• wa rrpad David C. BBnfer M aun rra I.xul Arrrwnx+n.E«t. p mrllr. rYYY, EdNwwa rMnoarep•. ro. Yb on CrnEP a rcn a ra axoarmrr wrrr eoneA uMYbrxgr Ara wnnACV of wrrryYYP in r rmoum N1YR.ranE f Tf9D000 in.M oubb unEElCCkrY: EYVIf Y1E EYIR/lE uaC Yr AnwlbNJhnJia NM parr Yq YYMrM ro eo w p PArblm Yrrry.d MwrYy. rwu iYN w aa0w b Y YYY in Mry1KtlM MI.Ynn Y Yal d YM lprpa•Opl. GOUa dA Mn naYYMy b rah d Ya rorpaabr IuM PPw d wMMMn .M r.w[.- non: Ya r a M wsa ra AronYArFp-frL wl.lYN ro rlrY w.rYO rrr nwry ndbtl Ya eorwrmr. TM wmwq •w owY«• ceawwtl Er M Paw a Atbrry r IYI rrntl a rNr a M rorPlnlN eonaw urows.ubr w apYrsa wrrrnlp. BYR nCPPr.orY OoM. mwgyreYklwN.reapA malEpr QYMrMCr Oa W, Wnrrraroarmwn oww. rs Wxx'Y.eana., ema. an NuncW .nxmwiY. wr mrpa NwrmG amrnY VINIWW WrW. wlirur. Colby IYYRI salty OW 0mr. TnNPOwdAbwry NaYMYa napba Ey YYwrulrow W OYMrRaIIraMMVWYrwaubrraYYnb/MlrprlMbrrddrrW.dRWpWRYCOYMNY w CALJIOIMY ua DEYEEOraE XHYINIICN CDYrAYY, rNaNY r a Ewembr in, nYf: RESOLVED. MIMCNWmYIdM NrE. M Rr1eY11Ar YM Vtr PrrpYna MCarwwon CA rnxr YCMd Ma Miry k rlW V~ebr.wn Nw.a Altwr~w~ ourrWW MrwrRrllbpr YMPowrdAlbrnryb•YrVMOnpdWlaMaorperrnon.OdlMUMwYNfrwaooMY4awrrNWY: W MtMSrrYwydxry AIW- WR SsrYYy a M mrpdbbn Cw W rr a tMp Mnq M Yav¢r b HA M wWCOn a Yry wtll Powra AlpnA RESOLVED.F11PTNERMIMYprlwwdYlNab.MyrxMYnbxry br PowrdARanryab YryovYWYrYCMglMrroOybrbNM,YtlYrywr Powra Arr. nEr0r41EkM0rhgral nYrnMYpl~llrrYtr M•YkIYa CaCYq YPMMaLrrr.EOnwlYn Ylx1YN W MMIWr.YllrptlbYN OOIA. nntlrlallnlp a WnbMal MYryrIP b MNCII n b aYdW. rR1TNFAt1YIlfMOr, YIOWY)r COWAMrwcMJr0111AAtlagY~WrW NIEIIRAfICECOMMI1YNCrrYwrryoYYrf\MPrYIbbMMEINeEynRY~rprt- M M1rlEwls Wa AY~fO Yy EIEY rrprYw ESarYllr rllr Aln ry d OatlEw, IIEE EgdMM1 COIIIAIII w CAYrBYRA orvaarau fXEUftrIOE ooYfYlYr J lwamo 'RnYOMN AYr ~ JMMIr J/S.PYYY, RVWOY. ,nfu • . l/ eM0 ~ ATTFBT M` - ATTEST A I+ `y~flr hul E, OIX14. N., rir.Yll~ Ewl E OrXIMI, J , ~IRgR STATE Or CALIFORrA 1 I SS. CODNTVw OMNOE 1 On Oawbr Nl. lfr. MNr. mr, M VMYYpnr,.NaYrrYMCYYr RN W 6YR rYrabfy YMlrrN JYgIb J, 9YEYby W MW C hElln, k.. PYrCIbIIY CnY1rn b M for pror.apilwanMwbarnMaorrwawwlbe.MrYEelraarruYaMaMnMwMdrPnaenllrbarnwyoneYMaxlawa+rycanpxryacrmnwbp u PrAYewll Ya 9rnbrv an rwm a Dwdtloar ilvrs crAlrYN. MCwrorrYYb Arran nrNe. YY rAwwrra b M Mt M IrpwrEYY mwYa n. MTNE%my nW Ya Gnarl wY. OffICIAL SEAL yf/n VIRGINIA M. lOUMAN Sbrtun ~I'~""" ~ JI/y"'y' NOTAM PUBLIGCAUfONNIA Newlr PVaa ORANGE COUNTY Yr CamrsYr EnENw YY. 17, I9E9 cElmncAn *M ~newrprtl, r firaNr VKr Mwutlrtol IIID/YMRr COfIMMr wC1WA1WIA, Yb4rwtrn vaP.waYndBMLwaIEOY1YIEYCEOOYrAYr,aoY nxwy aar^Nw~lwemrol rw mr w.~m. rl~iam ro~ina~ a Am.rlq. En a~m.e.~ r a~i m.a r a~mNrc«~bmi«mws nwMwwraYaMrrauronaMr.r.alY.ewro.ot rnN Gwm~a Na«vYE inMOMdArurbbl. UlXUrdA M..jISL rra Anri1 tr2. IYDEYMT'COWANI Or cALN01NNA •~y o~YEIOrERE fYYMAMCE CBYMIIY e. )MTYN JI Irl LMmYN N. > Hq •i L.cdM VIDI PrYban • ~ o FJEW IM Vb IIr10r1 ' r •`'') .D n,r nav lJ/Y t 3 / RES67-a • RESOLUTION N0. 87 f ~ Q j A RESOLUTION OP TR6 CITT COUNCIL OP TAE CITY OP RANCHO COCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, AUTROAIZIRO TAE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS AND DOCUldNT3 NRICli ARE NO LONGER REQUZAED AS YAWID® OtmSR GWERNl9:NT CODE 56CTION 34090 NH]!AL'AS, it 6u been deut~ined that certala City record. under the charge of the follwing City Department arm no longer required for public or private purpopr. Administration/Pazaonael N;USAEAS, it hu bean datermiaed that dutruciioa of the above-mweianed maCazials is neceuazy to conaama storage apace, an reduce .raft tine, azpaaaa, sad confuaioa in handling, and infotaiag the public; and WREREAS, Section 34090 of the Govarammut Coda of the Staten of California authori:u cha head of • Ciq deparcmeac to dutrq aq City record. sad doc:oann mhieh era over ero yore old under him or her ehargm, sithoat making • copy thereof, .Tres then aaaa era no longer required, upon the approval of the Ciq Council bT ruolotion and then arittan comaaat of the Ciq Attorney; and • NIUSREAS, it is eharefore darirable to daatrq acid record. a Tiered in B:hibit ^A" attached harem and uda ^ part hereof, in ^totage, rithou[ making • copy thaaof, rhich are over tmo years old; and WRBREAS. uid record. 6ne been approved fox dntruction by the Ciq Attarnn. NON. TREREtORE, THH CITY COUNCIL OP TRH C21T OP RANCl10 COCAMONGA DOES AESOIVS As PoLLaNS: SECTION 1: That approval sad authorisation is hereby given to dutrq [hoes record. dneribed a Eshibit ^A^ attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 2: That the Ciq Clerk is eutdozised to all ar azuinaeioa by and dooetion Ca the Department of Spacial Collactione of the Onivaniry Reacarch Library, Univmraiq of Glitomia, or o[het historical •oc ieq du ignated by the Ciq Guacii, aq of the records described in ~hibit "A" attached hmreto sad uda • part hereof, acept those dared to be confidential. SECTION 3: That the Ciq Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution, end th¢aceforth sad tharaafiar the sue shall be in £u11 force and effect, /3s n HAIIBIT "A" Personnel Policies - 1981 Progzaa of Services - 1982 through 1984 Watioonaira/Specificatiooa for Cdusificatioa StudT - 1980 WeruiLent Piles for: Jusietaat Planner -October 1982 Maintenance Worker - Boveaber 1982 Maintenance Norkar - Jannat) and Hepteaber 1987 8ngiseering Technician - ~3' 1953 Huildisg Inspector - Jma 1983 Planning Inters -June sad Ottober 198! Ns«iab Civil IDgiwer -Jane and Jnl~ 1983 Asa«iaq Plaawz - Sptenher and Moveaber 1987 Accowt Qazk - Septaabat 1981 Assistant Planwr - Sapteabar 1969 Park Plmwr - Moeaaber 1989 AdainLtreti~e Aeal~at - December 1983 Aasistani Flamer - Nq 1984 • Me«iata Planner - Mry 1961 Assistant Park Planwr -March 1963 N•«iaG Civil ID~ginear - Mereb 1985 Aa•«iate Plmnar -March 1985 /31 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RECORDS SNVENTORY WORKSREET IN OEPAR'I?7EC7T Administration FILE CAB. N0. LOCATION Personnel SHELF CASE N0. PACE N0. 1 Of 1 ~ OTNER PREPARED BY/DATE M. Kuhn 4/1/87 VOLUME (CD. Ff.) INCLUSIVE DATES 39~-1985 DRAWER N0. SHELF N0. SERIES TITLE(S) 6 DESCRIPTION OF CONTENTS REMARKS: Personnel Policies 1981 Program of Services 1982-83 1983-84 OuestionrwirelSpecs for Classification Study 1980 f2MNItIfIQnt3 Title Dote Yea Auistont Planner October 1982 Maintenance Worker tJOVember 1992 Maintenance Worker Jan b Sep} 9 En4ineering Tect+nician Moy 1 83 Buildirq Inspector June 1483 Planning Inrorn June 6 Oct 1483 Associate Civil Engineer June iS JuIY 1983 Associate Planner Sept ~' Nov ^ 1 3 Account Clerk SePtemDer 9 8 Assistant Planner Seot-mtir ~<~ Park Planter November 1983 ^.drd~d~uanve Analyst December 1987 Assistant Planner May 19~ Associate Planner MaY Assistant Park Planner March 1985 Associate Civil Engineer March 1985 Associaro Planner March 1985 I di•PROV~D FOR OESTRCCTION BY DISPOSITION OF RECORDS: CITY ATTOR.YEY / 3'f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT •~~~. ~'~~ ~ z 19~' DATE: April 15, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FRUM: Robert A. Rizzo, Assistant City Manager 9Y: Jerry 8. Fulwood, Assessment Revenue Coordinator SUBJECT: Approval of Resolution. Grdering Preparation of • Reanvortiorment Report for Tract Mao 9849 within The Alta Loma Channel 184-21. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Resolution Ordering Preparation of ReapPOrtSonment Report for Tract Map 9649 within The Alta Loma Charnel. EVALUAT'ON: Pursuant to Part 10 of the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 for APPortionment of Assessments because oP the subdivision of land; tF.e approval of Resolution Ordering Preparation of Reapportionemnt Report is necessary. This Resolution directs the Assessment Revenue Section to prepare a Reapportionment Report, amend assessment diagram and establish fee for apportionment which is six hundred dollars. Respectfully Submitted, `~. ~`, Bober^. A. P.' o ASSietent ty Manager RAR:JBF:kmm A*.tachment: Resolution Ordering Preparation of Reapportionment Report / 3i` RESOLUTION N0. g'I -I8 f' RESOLUTION OF TEE CITY COUNCIL 09 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PRPPARATION OF A papppORTIONMENT REPORT AND AMENDED ASSESSMENT AND DT_AGRAM IN ASSESS47ENT DISTRICT AND ESTABLISHING REAPPORTIONMENT aE v_S POo, TRACT MAP 9649 WITHIN THE ALTA LOMA CHANNEL. WHEREAS, the CI^_'Y COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has prey±ously confirmed assessments in a special assessment district, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and bonds were issued to represent the costs for unpaid assessments pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Improvement Bond Act o£ 1915", being Division 10 of said Code, said special assessment district known and designated as Assessment District 84-2. (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District") and, • WHEREAS, subsequent thereto, certain lots and!or parcels of land upon which there are unpaid assessments have been apportioned or divided; and, WHEREAS, at this time this legislative body is desirous to order the reapportionment of sain nnna i.i sae e.,.~ ., to the provisions of Part 10 of ". he "Improvement Bond~ACt-of` 1915". NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. That the Superintendent of Streets is hereby ordered to Pile with the City Clerk a report entitled "Reapportionment Report" and an amended assessment and diagram of the origSnal parcel or parcels of land atf ected by such division or transfer of ownership, segregating and apportioning the unpaid insialiments of the original assessment in accordance with the benefits to the several parts of the original assessment in accordance with the benefits to the several parts of the origSnal lot or parcel, plus costs and fees of making the app rt.ionment. /3G SECTION 3, That this legislative body hereby determines and establishes a fee in the amount of 5600.00 to cover the costs of the reapportionment. SECTION 6. That <he Superintendent of Streets shall, prior to making a division and making the amended assessment, notify the owner of the original parcel or parcels assessed, as the name of the owner or owners appear on the last equalized assessment roll for taxes, ar as said owner or owners are known *_o the Superintendent of Streets, of the order of this legislative body fixing the costs and fees of the apportionmen[, and direetSng that the payment of such coats and fees be made to the Superintendent of Streets within fSf seen (15) days of ouch notlflcation. In the event that the reapportionment fee Ss not paid within of teen (15) days of such notlficatlon, the Superintendent of Streets shall proceed to prepare the amended assessment • and shall show separately thereon, but as a parC of the total, the reapportionment fee chargeable to each dSv3ded parcel. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 1987, AYES: NOES: ABSENT: s L. Stout ATTEST: Sever;y .,, Autheiet, City Cierk /3'7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 15, 1987 T0: City Covncil and Ciiy Manager FRDM: Robert A. Rizzo, Assistant Clty Manager ,p ~~ kont- ~C 1 t~~° .> ,- x 19'- ~ BY: Jerry 9. Fulwood, Assessment Revenue Coordinator SUBJHCT; Aoaroval of Resolution ADProvin4 Purchase • Agreement with Underwrltar~ Stone and Younabero for Aasessment District 86-2. Recommendation: St is recommended that City Council approve the Resolution Approving the Purchase Agreement with Stone and Youngberg for Assessment Drainage District 86-2 Bond Sale. Backoround: .,e. ~i, 4, •do~, City Council approved the formation of Assessment Drainage District 86-2, The issuance of the bond for the proposed Assessment District is scheduled for April of 1987. A purchase agreement from Stone and Yourgberg, our underwriter, is attached for City Council's Approval. Respe tf uily Submitted, f~~~/ Robert A. ,ICt zzo Assistan City Manager pqR: rvc. K^„~ ~1 Attachments /3 ~ /87 RESOLUTION NO. _~-P~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN HERNARDINO COCNTY, CALIPORNIA, ACCEPTING A PROPOSAL FOR SALE OF BONDS AND MAKING OTHER DETERMINATIONS WHEREAS, the City Council oL the Cit o! Rancho Cucamonga (the "City") has heretofore instituted andyconducted proceedings, pursuant to the "Municipal Improvement Act o! 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code, for certain public works and improvements and acquisitions generally described as follows: The construction and acquisition of drainage improvements including appurtenances and appurtenant work, acquisition o! interests in real property and incidental expanses in connection tharnwith (the "Improvements^); WHEREAS, the lands specially assessed for the improvements are included within an aaaaaament district designated as • ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86-2 (the "Assessment Distriei"); wwnocna '_n the ^-,G:,liaLiw, vL intention, it was determined and declared that bonds representing unpaid assessments would be issued under the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", being Division 10 of the Straeta end Highways Code (the "Bonds"); and WHEREAS, there has now bean received, in proper Porn, a proposal for the purchase o! the Honda to be issued under the assessment proceedings and the acceptance o! this proposal will best serve the interests of the owners of land included within the Assessment District: NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby RESOLVE, DECLARE AND ORDER as follows: Section 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. Section 2. The written proposal received from STONE S YOUNGBERG C.J i39 for the purchase of the Bonds Yepresentinq unpaid assessments in the Assessment District is hereby accepted and approved. Section 3. The sale of the Bonds is subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the: (a) Accepted proposal; (b) Resolution authoriz inq issuance of Bonds; ' (c) Resolution of intention; and (d) Improvement Bond Act of 1915. Section 4. The Treasurer is hereby directed to have the Bonds printed immediately and to have the Sonds signed and del leered to the purchaser upon receipt of the amount of moneys due pursuant to thn proposal and upon the performance of all the conditions set forth in Section 3. Section 5. The interest rate (or rates) on and the maturities of the Bonds are hereby fixed at the rata (or rotes) and maturities as sat forth in the accepted proposal. Section 6. Tha City Clark shall certify to the passage and adoption o! this resolution; shall enter the soma in the hook of • original resolutions of the City; and shall make n minute entry of the passage and adoption thereof in the record of the proceedings of the City Council of the City and in the minutes of the meeting at which the acme is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1997. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dennis L. Stout, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk ,yo z ;~' I, BEVERLY AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho • Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City o! Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City council held on the day of , 1987. Executed thin ~ day of 1987, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk • iY/ • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~ 9 < > ~`!' 19"4 DATE: April 15, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Robert A. Rizzo, Assistant City Manager By: Jerry B, Fulwood, Assessment Revenue CoordSnator SUBJECT: Aoaroval of Paid and rnoaid List and Authorize Isavence_of Bonds for Rancho Cucamonga Drainage Assessment DistrSct 86-2 Sn the A roximate Amount of S2 122 363 Recommendation• It is recommended that CSty Council approve the resolution approving the paid and unpaid listing and authorizing the Issuance of 9onds _"or Rancho Cucamonga Drainage Asaessmen; District 66-2 in the approximate amount of $2,122,163. ?_Y: ~ui:4: Dn March 4, 1987, City Council approved the tormatlon of the prepared Assessment Drainage District 86-2. The property owners within the district were given the opportunity to prepay their assessments prior to the bond sale, The attached 31st reflects the paid and unpaid status of these properties. Respectfully Submitted, //',/'. RoSrrt A: zzo Ass=`-tanJ+-, C•ty Manager RAR:JBF:kmm iYa. ;8g . RESOLUTION NO. $ 7 _~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING UNPAID ASSESSMENTS; DESIGNATING PAYING AGENT, AUTHENTICATING AGENT, TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR; AND PROVIDING FOR ISSUANCE OF BONDS UNDER THE IMPROVEMENT BOND A T OF :oit WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has heretofore commenced assessment proceedings pursuant to the Resolution of Intention, under the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, and has confirmed assessments on parcels within the boundaries of a special assessment district designated ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86-2 WHEREAS, notice o1 the recordation of the assessment and of the time within which assessments may be paid in cash has been published and mailed in the manner provided by law, the time provided for receiving payment of assessments in cash has expired, and a list of all assessments which now remain unpaid has been filed with the Treasurer; WHEREAS, the assessment proceedings provide for the • issuance of Honda, in an aggregate amount not to exceed the total amount of the unpaid assessments, under the Improvement Bend Act at 1915, and it is necessary to establish the terms for the issuance of the Bonds; WHEREAS. ih is _ ~~_. =ry --•~.. th= Cl Ly nuchoriza the sale of Bonds representing unpaid assessments; and WHEREAS, Stone s Youngberg has offered to purchase the Bonds pursuant to a Purchase Contract presented to the City and the City wishes to approve the sale of the Bonds to Stone 6 Youngberg, pursuant to the Purchase Contract: NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby RESOLVE, DECLARE AND ORDER as follows: ARTICLE I DEFZNZTIONS• RV*ec OF OAeTRUCTION SECTION 1.01. Definitions. The following terms will have the meanings indicated below unless the context clearly requires otherwise: "1913 Act" means the Municipal Improvement Act ~: 1913, Being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code. /H? "1915 Act" means the Municipal Improvement Act of 1915, being Division to o! the Streets and Highways Code. "Assessment District" means Assessment District No. 86-2 of the City. "Bond Counsel" means counsel whose opinion is acceptable by underwriters in the marketing of tax-exempt obligations of public entities and political subdivisions. "Bondowner" or "Owner" means the person in whose name any Bond is registered upon the Bond Register maintained by the Paying Agent. "Bond Register" means the books for registration to be maintained by the Paying Agent, pursuant to Section 4.01 hereof. "Bonds" means improvement bonds representing unpaid assess- ments issued under the 1915 Act. "Bond Year^ means the twelve month period beginning an the anniversary of the Cloeinq Date in each year and ending on the day prior to the anniversary data of the Closing Date in the following year except that the first Certificate Year shall begin on the Closing Date. "Cash Payment Account" means the account within the • Improvement Fund designated by the name of the Bonds established under Section 7.02 and held by the Treasurer. "City" means the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino county, California. "City Clerk" means the City Clerk of the City. "City Council" means the governing body of the City. "Closing Date" means the date upon which there is an exchange of the Bonds for the proceeds representing the purchase of the Bonds by the Underwriter. "Code" means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. "Debt Service" means ehe scheduled payment of principal and interest on the Bonds. "Excess Zncome" means the amount by which ali i.".come ear..^.ed `°^- the investment of Invested Funds in Non-Purpose Investments exceeds the amount which would have been earned if the Invested Funds had been invested at the Yield plus any income attribut- able to such excess. • 2 i ~1 y "Excess Investment Earnings^ means an amount equal to the • sum of: (a) The excess of (i) The aggregate amount earned Prom the Closing Date on all Non-purpose obligations in which Gross Proceeds of the Bonds are invested (other than amounts attributable to an excess described in this clause (a)), over (ii) The amount that would have been earned if the Yield an such Non-purpose Obligations (other than amounts attributable to an excess described in this clause (a)) had bean equal to the Yield o! the Bonds, plus (b) Any income attributable to the excess described in clause (a) above. ^Excesa Investment Earnings Fund^ means the fund designated by the name o! the Honda established under Section 9.02 and held by the Treasurer. "Fiscal Year" means July 1 of each year through the next succeeding June 30. . ^Gross Proceeda^ means the sum oL the following amounts: (a} Original Proceeds, namely, net amounts received by or for the City as a result of the sale of the Bonds; (ti +::~=e~µ=uL y<uueeds, namely, amounts received at any time by or for the City, such as interest and dividends, resulting from the investment of any original Proceeds (as referenced in clause (a) above) ar investment proceeds (as referenced in this clause (b)) in Non-purpose Obligations, increased by any profits and flecreased (if necessary, below zero) by any losses on such investments; (c) Amounts in the Reserve Fund and in any other fund establishefl as a reasonably required reserve or replacement fund; (d) Investment Property pledged as security to make principal or interest payments on the Bonds; , (e) Amounts, other than as specified in this definition, used to make prirc ipal cr interest pa}aents on the Bonds; and (f) Amounts received as a result of investing amounts described 1n this definition. 3 ~ y,_ "Improvement Pund^ means the fund designated by the name of . the Bonds established under Section 7.01 and held by the Treasurer. ^improvements" mean the improvements constructed and/or acquired for or on behalf of the Assessment District together with appurtenances anfl appurtenant work, acquisition and incidental expenses in connection therewith. "interest Payment Date^ means March 2 and September 2 of each year commencing March 2, 1988. "invested Funds" mean that portion of the Original Proceeds invested in Non-Purpose Investments. "Investment Earnings Fund" means the'Yund designated by the name of the Bonds established under Section 8.01 and held by the Treasurer. "Investment Property" means any security (as defined in section 166(g)(2)(A) or (aj of the Code), ohligation, annuity contract or investment-type property, excluding, however, obligations the interest on which is excluded from gross income, under section 103 of the Code, for federal income tax purposes. "Net Proceeds" when used with reference •to the Bonds, means the face amount of the Honda, plus accrued interest and premium, iP any, less original issue fliscount and less proceeds deposited in the Reserve Fund. "Non-Purpose Investments" means any investment pronerty which: {a) Is acquired with the Gross Proceeds of the issue; a~,.: {b) Is not acquired in order to carry out the governmental purpose of the issue. ^NOn-Purpose Obligation" means any Investment Property which is acquired with the Gross Proceeds of the Honda and is not acquired in order to carry out the governmental purpose of the issue. "Original Proceeds" means the proceeds from the sale of the Honds. "Original Purchaser" means the first purchaser of the Bonds upon their delivery by the city. "outstanding" when used with reference to the Bonds and as of any particular date means all Bonds theretofore delivered except: • 4 / `/~ (a) Ary Bond cancelled by the Treasurer on or before said date; and (b) Any Bond in lieu of or in substitution for which another Bond shall have been delivered pursuant to the Section 3.12 Hereof. "Paying Agent" means the Treasurer of the City who shall act as paying agent, authenticating agent, transfer 'agent and registrar with respect to the Bonds. "Permitted investments" mean any investments authorized pursuant to Article 1, Chapter 4, Part 1, Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, as amended from time to time. "Private Business IIse" means use directly or indirectly in a trade or business carried on by a natural person or in any activity carried on by a person other than a natural person, excluding, however, use by a governmental unit and use as a member of the general public. "Purchase Agreement" or "PUrchaea Contract" means the agreement by and between the Original Purchaser and City for the purchase of the Bonds. "Purchase Price" for the purpose of computation of the • Yield of the Bonds, rias the same meaning as the term "issue price" in sections 1273(b) and 1274 of the Code, and, in general, means the initial offering price of the Bonds to the public (not including bind houses and brokers, or similar persons or organizations acting in the capacity of underwriters or ::holcaalcr~) a - .. et i..n a aubscantial amount o1 the Honds are sold or, if the Honds are privately placed, the price paid by the first buyer of the Bonds or the acquisition cost of the first buyer. The term "Purchase Price", for the purpose of computation of the Yield of Non-Purpose Obligations, means the fair market value of the Non-Purpose Obligations on the data of use of Gross Proceeds of the Bonds far acquisition thereof, or if later, on the date that Investment Property constituting a Non-Purpose obligation becomes a Non-Purpose Obligation of the Bonds. "Redemption Fund" means the fund designated by the name of the Honds established under Section 6.01 and held by the Treasurer. "Record Date" means the close of business on the fifteenth !i5*h) day of the mort.^. preceding each Interest Payment Date whether such fifteenth (15th) day is a Business Day. "Regulations" means temporary or permanent regulations promulgated under the Code. /y7 "Reserve Fund" means the fund designated by the name of the Honds established under Section 5.01 and held by the Treasurer, • "Reserve Requirement" means an amount equal to ten percent (10$) of the par value of the Bonds. "Resolution oP Intention" means Resolution No. 86-93, as amended, adopted by the City Council. "Superintendent of Streets" means the Superintendent of Streets of the City. "Treasurer" means the Treasurer of the City. "Unpaid List" means the list of assessments on file with the Treasurer remaining unpaid thirty (30)' days after recorda- tion of the assessment in the office of the Superintendent oP Streets. ^Yield" means that yield which, when used in computing the present worth o1 all payments of principal and interest (or other payments in the cash of Non-Purpose Obligations which require payments in a form net characterized as principal and interest) on a Non-Purpose Obligation or of the Sonds produces an amount equal to the Purchase Price of such Non-Purpose obligation or the Bonds, all computed as prescribed in applicable Regulations. • ARTICLE II SECTION 2.01. Unpaid Assessments. The assessments now remaining unpaid in the aggregate amount of $2,059,351.81 are shown on the Unpaid List on file in the oPPice of the Treasurer and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 2.02. Parcel Descriptions. For a description of the lots or parcels of land bearing the respective assessment numbers set forth on the unpaid List and upon which assessments remain unpaid, reference is hereby made to the assessment and diagram recorded in the Office of the Superintendent of Streets. • 6 ~ vy • ARTICLE III BONDS SECTION 3.01. Issuance of Bonds. Bonds shall be issued in the aggregate principal amount of $2,059,351.81 representing assessments remaining unpaid as shown on the Unpaid List, upon the security of the unpaid assessments, pursuant to the 1915 Act, Resolution o! Intention and assessments proceedings duly had and taken, for the purpose of paying for the costs of the Improvements for the Assessment District. SECTION 3.02. t~ecistration: Denomination. The Bonds shall be issuable only as fully registered Bonds Sn the denomination of $5,000, or any integral multiple thereof; except that, if the amount by which the total issue exceeds the maximum integral multiple o! $5,000, then one Hond in such amount shall be issued to mature in the first year of maturity. SECTION 3.03, Date. Ths Bonds shall be dated Apzil 6, 1987 • and interest shall accrue thereon from such date, unless otherwise provided by the Purchase Contract. SECTION 3.04. Maturity. The Bonds shall ba issued in serial form with annual maturities an September 2nd of each year succeeding the first twelve (12) months after their date, until u,o wiw lc la yuiu. cud ia~t au5..driS.an. vi uGn..~ 5...... w.......o .,n September 2, 2007 The amount maturing each year shall be such as to result in approximately equal annual debt service during the term of the issue, as provided by the Purchase Contract. SECTION 3.07. Interest. Each Bond shall ba of a single maturity and shall bear interest at the rata to be determined on the sale thereof on March 2 or September 2 commencing March 2, 1988 next preceding the date on which it is authenticated and registered, unless: (a) The Bond is authenticated and registered as of an Interesk Fayment Date, in which case it shall bear interest from such Interest Payment Date; or 7 /'! 9 (b) The Bond is authenticated and registered prioz to the • first Interest Payment Date, in which case it shall bear interest Prom its date; until payment of its principal sum has been discharged. SECTION 3.06. Form of Bonds. The Bonds shall be substantially in the form set forth on Exhibit A. SECTION 3.07. Medium of Payment. The Bonds shall be payable in lawtul money of the United States of America which at the time oY payment is legal tender for the payment of pubiic and private debts. SECTION 3.08. Payment oP Principal and Interest. The principal on the Bonds shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America at the Principal Office of the Paying Agent. Interest on the Bonds shall be paid by the Paying Agent by check mailed on the Interest Payment Date to the registered owner of each Hond as his name and address appear on the Bond Register kept by the Paying Agent at the close of business on the Record Date. SECTION 3.09. Failure to Pav Interest. Each Hond shall continue to bear interest after maturity at the rata stated thereon, provided it is presented at maturity and payment thereof is refused on the sole ground that there is not sufficient money • in the Redemption Fund with which to pay same. If a Bond is not presented at maturity, interest thereon shall run only until maturity. SECTION 7.10. Execution. The Banda shall be executed in ieu~imiie by the l~reasurer and City Clerk. The seal oP the City shall be imprinted in facsimile on the Bonds. The Bonds shall then be delivered to the Paying Agent for authentication and registration. in case an officer who shall have signed or attested to any of the Hands by facsimile or otherwise shall cease to be such officer before the authentication, delivery and issuance of the Bonds, the Bonds nevertheless may be authenticated, delivered and issued, and thereupon shall be as binding as though those who signed and attested the same had remained in office. SECTION 3.11. Authentication. Only those Bonds which bear a certificate of authentication substantially in the form set forth on Exhibit A manually executed by the ?aging Agent shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to the benefits ^f t.^.=s Resoluticn, T.`.e certif icata of the Paying Agent shall be conclusive evidence that the Bonds so authenticated have been duly executed, authenticated and delivered hereunder, and are entitled to the benefits of this Resolution. / s-O SECTION 7.12. Bonds Mutilated oest~ovad toy • In case any Bond shall become mutilated or be destroyedr stolen or lost, the City shall execute and the Paying Agent shall authenticate and deliver a new bond of like maturity and principal amount as the Hond so mutilated, destzoyed, stolen or lost, in exchange and substitution For such a mutilated Bond, upon surrender and cancellation of the mutilated Hond or in lieu of and in substitution Por a destroyed, stolen or lost Bond, upon filing with the City and the Paying Agent evidence satisfactory to the City and the Paying Agent that the bond has been destroyed, stolen or lost and proof of ownership thereof, and upon furnishing the City and the Paying Agent with indemnity satisfactory to each, complying with such other reasonable regulations as the City and the Paying Agent may incur. All mutilated Honds so surrendered shall be cancelled by the Paying Agent. SECTION ].13. Temmorarr Bonds. Until the definitive Bonds are prepared, the City may execute and the Paying Agent may authenticate and deliver, in lieu of definitive Bonds, but subject to the same provisions, limitations and conditions as the definitive Bonds, except as to exchangeability for Bonds, ono or more temporary Bonds (whicR shall be registered as to principal and interest), substantially of the tenor of the definitive Bonds in lieu o! which such temporary Hond or Bonds are issued and with such omissions or insertions of and variations from the terms and conditions thereof as may be • appropriate to temporary Bonds. Tha City at its expanse shall prepare and execute and the Paying Agent upon the surrender of such temporary Bonds for exchange and the cancellation of such surrendered temporary Honds, without charge to the owner thereof, shall authenticate and deliver in exchange therefor, at the Principal Office of the Paying Agent, definitive Bonds of the soma aggregate principal amount and maturity. T_he temporary Bonds shall in all respects be entitled to the same benefits and security as def initiva Bonds issued pursuant to this Resolution. Ail temporary Bonds surrendered in exchange for a definitive Bond or Bonds shall be forthwith cancelled by the Paying Agent. SECTION 7.14. Order to Print and Authenticate ponds. The Treasurer is hereby instructed to cause the Bonds, in such form as shall be approved by the City and its Bond Counsel, to be printed, and to proceed to cause the Bonds to be authenticated and delivered to an authorized representative of the Underwriter, upon payment of the purchase price as set forth in the accepted Purchase Agreement for the sale of Bonds. /5/ • ARTICLE IV REGISTRATION• TRANSFER• EXC*iANGE• CANCF amrON SECTION 4.01. Hond Register. All oP the Bonds issued under this Resolution shall be subject to the provisions for registration and transfer contained in this Resolution and in the Bands. So long as any of the Bonds shall remain outstanding, the Paying Agent shall maintain and keep,' at its principal office, the Bond Register, and, upon presentation of a Bond for registration or transfer at the Principal office, the paying Agent shall register or cause to be registered therein, and permit to be transferred thereon, under such reasonable regulations as the clty or the Paying Agent may prescribe, any Hond sat itled to registration or transfer. So long as any of the Bonds remain outstanding, the City shall make all necessary provisions to permit the exchange of Bonds at the Principal Office o! the Paying Agent. SECTION 4.02. Transfer of Bonds. Each Bond shall be transferable only upon the Bond Register by the Owner thereof in person or by his attorney duly authorized in writing, upon surrender thereof, together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Paying Agent duly executed by the owner or his duly authorized attorney. Upon the transfer of any Bond, the paying Agent shall issue in the name oL the transferee a new Hond or Bonds of a like aggregate principal . amount of the same series, interest rate and maturity as the surrendered Bond ar Bonds. SECTZON 4.00. Exchange of Honda. Any Hond or Bonds may be exchanged at the Principal Office of the Paying Agent, upon surrender thereof, by the ownn. r. -: Ly iiis accorrey duly authorized in writing. Upon^exchangeVof such Hond or Bonds, the Paying Agent shall Issus in the name of the Owner thereof a new Bond or Honda fora like aggregate principal amount of the same series, interest rate and maturity as the surrendered Bond or Honda. SECTION 4.04. Regulations with Reaoect to Exchanges and Transfers. Zn all cases in which the privilege of exchanging or transferring Bonds is exercised, the City shall execute and the Paying Agent shall authenticate and deliver Bonds in accordance with the provisions of this Resolution. All Bonds surrendered in any such exchanges or transfers shall forthwith ba cancelled by the Paying Agent and delivered to the City. For every such exchange or transfer of Bonds, whether temporary or definitive, the City or the Faying Agent may impcse a charge efficient to reimburse them for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such exchange or transfer (other than such as may have been imposed by the City), which sum or sums shall be paid by the person 10 /S2 requesting such exchange or transfer as a condition precedent . to the exercise of the privilege of making such exchange or transfer. SECTION 4.05. No Exchange or Transfer. No exchange or transfer of Honds shall be made during the period from any Record Date to the next succeeding Interest Payment Date. SECTION 4.06. Cancellation. All Bonds paid or redeemed, either at or before maturity, shall be cancelled upon payment or redemption of such Bonds, and upon delivery of such Bonds to the Paying Agent when such payment or redemption is made. All Bonds cancelled under any of the provisions of this Resolution shall ba sent by certified or registered mail to the City which shall retain such Honds for the statutory period of one year, after which such Honds may be destroyed upon execution of a certificate describing the Bonds so destroyed. The City shall retain the executed certificate in its permanent files for the issue. ARTICLE V ',SERVE FVND SECTION 5.01. Reserve Fund. A fund is hereby created and designated • Reserve Fund Assessment District No. 86-2 to be held and administered by the Treasurer. EECTIO:: ^i~ru-i~_lw: ui rroceeas. none proceeds in an amount equal~to the Reserve Requirement of $205,934.41 shall be transferred to the Reserve Fund. SECTION 5.03. ADmllcation. The moneys in the Reserve Fund shall be applied as follows: (aJ Except as provided in Section 5.06, moneys in the Reserve Fund shall be transferred to the Redemption Fund for the Bonds if, as a result of delinquencies in the payment of assessments, there are insufficient moneys in the Redemption Fund to pay principal of and interest on the Bonds. Amounts so transferred shall be repaid to the Reserve Furd tram proceeds from the redemption or foreclosure of property with respect to which such transfer Was required and trom payments of the delinquent assessments; and • 11 ~s3 (b) Whenever moneys in the Reserve Fund are sufficient to • retire all of the Honds outstanding, plus accrued interest thereon, such money shall be transferred to the Redemption Fund and collection of the remaining unpaid assessments shall cease. SECTION 5.04. Investment. The moneys in the Reserve Fund may be invested and reinvested in Permitted Investments. SECTION 5.06. Transfer of Investment Earninos. All interest earnings and profits on amounts in the Reserve Fund shall ba transferred to the Znvestmert Earnings Fund upon receipt thereof. ARTICLE VI REDEMPTION FUND SECTION 6.01. 8edemotion Fund. A fund is hereby created and designated Redemption Fund Assessment District No. 86-2 to be held and administered by the Treasurer. SECTION 6.02. Di snosition of Proceeds: Bond proceeds in • the amount of $146,213.98 representing not to exceed one year's interest on the Bonds shall be deposited in the Redemption Fund upon sale and delivery of the Bonds. SECTION 6.03. Accrued Interest. Accrued interest paid by the original Purchaser, if any, shall be deposited in the Redemption fund upon sale and delivery of the Bonds and used for payment of interest due on the first Interest Payment Dates. SECTION 6.04. Annlication. Except as provided in Section 6.06, moneys in the Redemption Fund shall be used exclusively far the payment et principal of and interest on the Bonds when due. SECTION 6.05. Investment. The moneys in the Redemption Fund may be invested and reinvested in Permitted Investments. SECTION 6.06. Transfer Of Investment Earnings. A11 i^teres car ngs an3 pr or. amo~ `he Redempt on Fund shall be retained in thevRedemption Fund if such ee rnings and profits in any Hond Year are less than $100,000. If the aggregate earnings and profits equal or exceed $100,000 in any Bond Year, then all such earnings and profits shall be forthwith transferred to the investment Earnings .und. z2 lsY ARTICLE VIZ • IMPROVEMENT FUND SECTION 7.01. Improvement Fund. A fund is hereby created and designated Improvement Fund Assessment District No. 86-2 to be held and administered by the Treasurer. SECTION 7.02. Cash PavmenC Account. Within the Improvement Fund, an account is hereby created and designated Cash Payment Aecount Improvement Fund Assessment District No. 86-2 to ba held and administered by the Treasurer. SECTION 7.03. Disoosition_of Cash Pa~^.nents. All payments made by the owners oP property within the Assessment District, pursuant to Section 10603 of the Streets and Highways Coda, shall be deposited in the Caeh Payment Acceunt. SECTION 7.06. Investment of Cash Pat~enta. The moneys in • the Cash Payment Account may be invested and reinvested in Permitted Investments, without regard tc yield limitations or rebate requirements under the Code, and shall be retained in the Cash Payment Account Por thn purpose specified in Section 7.08. SECTION 7.OB. Di s_oosition of Bond Proceeds. After deposit oP the zaquired amounts in the Reserve Fund and Redemption Fund, the remaining proceeds Prom the sale of the Bonds shall be deposited in the Improvement Fund. SECTION 7.06. Investment oP Bond Proceeds. The moneys in the Improvement Fund, exclusive of the moneys in the Cash Payment Account, may ba invested and reinvested in Permitted Investments. SECTION 7.07. Transfer of Investment Earninos on Bond Proceeds. All interest earnings and profits on amounts in the Improvement Fund, exclusive of the amounts in the Cash Payment Account, shall be transferred to the investment Earnings Fund upon receipt thereof. 13 /ss SECTION 7.08. Anolication. The moneys in the Improvement Fund and Account therein shall be used exclusively for the . payment of the costs of the Improvements described in the Resolution of intention, as now or hereafter amended by appropriate change and modification proceedings. SECTION 7.09. Sure lus Funds. Any surplus in the Improvement Fund after completion of the Improvements shall remain in the improvement Fund for a Period not less than two (2) years from the date of receipt of Bond proceeds and thereafter shall be utilized or distributed pursuant to Section 10427.1 of the Streets and Highways Code. ARTICLE VIII REBATE SECTION 8.01. Investment Earnings Fund. A fund is hereby created and designated Investment Earnings Fund Assessment District No. 86-2 to be held and administered by the Treasurer. SF,CTION 8.02. Excess Investment Earnings Fund. A fund is hereby created and designated • Excess Investment Earnings Fund Assessment District No. 86-2 ~....~ ,.z11 a„u cumiuialernd by cite ~rreasurer. SECTION 8.03. Transfers to Investment Earnings Fund. All interest earnings and profits on amounts in all funds and accounts established hereunder, other than: (a) Interest earnings and profits on the Redemption Fund and any other funds referenced in this Section if such earnings in any Bond Year are less than $100,000; (b) Interest earnings and profits on amounts in funds and accounts which do not constitute Gross Proceeds; and (c) Interest earnings and profits on the Excess Investment Earnings Fund; shall, upon receipt by the Treasurer, be deposited in the Investment Earnings Fund. In addition, all interest earnings and profits on cross Proceeds in funds held by the City shall, upon receipt, be deposited by the Treasurer in the Investment Earrings Fund. • 14 is~ SECTION 5.04. Transfers to Fxcess Investmen` ern' . Fund. Annually, on the last day of each Bond Year or on the preceding business day in the event that such last day is not a business day, thn Treasurer shall transfer Prom the Investment Earnings Fund to the Excess Investment Earnings Fund for purposes of ultimate rebate to the United States an amount equal to Excess Investment Earnings. SECTION 5.05. Transfers to Redemption Fur•+, After the transfer, pursuant to Section B.Od, the Treasurer shall transfer all amounts rameining in the Investment Earnings Fund to the Redemption Fund to be used for Debt Service on the next Payment Date. SECTION 5.06. rn,ties of Treasur 'n General. The Treasurer shall calculate Excess investment Earnings in accordance with Section 5.07 and shall assure payment o1 an amount equal to Excess Investment Earnings to the United States in accordance with Sections 5.05 and 8.09. SECTION 8.07. Calculation of rxces~ Znv s ment arninc . Prior to the last day of the lust Bond Year, the Treasurer shall calculate the Excess Investment Earnings referenced in clause (a)(i) of the definition of Excess Investment Earnings. Thereafter, fifteen (15) days prior to the last day of each Bond Year and on the date of the payment of the Bonds in full, the Treasurer shall calculate the amount of Excess Investment • Earnings. The calculations shall ba made or caused to be made by the Treasurer as follows: (a) Except as provided in (b), in determining the amount described in clause (a)(i) of the deLinition of Excess .'„yo, Liie aygregata amount earned on Non-purpose Obligationsyshall include: (i) All income realized under Federal income tax accounting principles (whether or not the person earning such income is subject to federal income tax) with respect to such Non-purpose Obligations and with respect to the reinvestment of investment receipts from such Non-purpose Obligations (without regard to the transaction costs incurred ir. acquiring, carrying, selling or redeeming such Non-purpose Obligations), including, but not limited to, gain or loss realized on the disposition of such Non-purpose Obligations (without regard to when such gains are taken into acccu.^.t under Section 483 oP the Code relating to taxable year of inclusion of gross income), and income under section 1277 of the Code (relating to original issue discount); and 15 /S7 (ii) Any unrealized gain or loss as of the date of • payment of the Bonds in full in the event that any Nen-Purpose Obligation is retained after such date. (b) In determining the amount described in clause (a)(i) of the definition of Excess Investment Earnings, Investment Property shall be treated as acquired for its fair market value at the time it becomes a Non-purpose Obligation, so that gain or loss on the disposition of such Investment Property shall ba computed with reference to such fair market value as its adjusted basis. (c) In determining the amount described in clause (a)(ii) of the definition of Excess Investment Earnings, the Yield of the Bonds shall be determined based on the actual Yield of the Bonds during the period between the Closing Date and the date the computation is made (with adjustaents for original issue discount or premium). (d) In determining the amount described in clause (b) o£ the definition of Excess Investment Earnings, all income attributable to the excess described in clause (a) of this definition must be taken into account, whether or not that income exceeds the Yield of the Bonds, and no amount may be treated as "negative arbitrage". (e) Zn determining the amount of Excess Investment Earnings, • there shall be excluded any amount earned on any fund or account which is used primarily to achieve a proper matching of revenues and Debt Service within each Bond Year and which is depleted at least once a year except for a reasonable carryover amount not in excess of the greater of one year's earnings on such fund or ~..1 vi uutl-Lweii Lit uP annual ueac service as wall as amounts earned on such earnings if the gross earnings on such fund or account for the Bond Year is less than $100,000. SECTION 8.08. payment to the United States. The Treasurer shall pay from the Excess Investment Earnings Fund an ameunt equal to Excess Investment Earnings to the United States in installments with the first payment to be made not later than thirty (30) days after the end of the fifth (5th) Bond Year and with subsequent payments to be made not later than five (5) years after the preceding payment was due. The Treasurer shall assure that each such installment is in an amount equal to ac least ninety percent (90~) of the Excess Investment Earnings with respect to the Gross Proceeds as of the close of the computation period. Not later than sixty (60) days after the payment of the Bonds in full, the Treasurer shall pay from the Excess Investment Earnings Fund to the United States one hundred percent (100$) of the theretofore unpaid Excess Investment Earnings. In the event that there are any amounts remaining in the Excess Investment Earnings Fund following the payment required by the preceding sentence, the Treasurer shall pay such amounts to the city to be • 16 /r8 • used for any lawful purpose of the City. The Treasurer shall remit payments to the United States at the address prescribed by the Regulations as the same may be from time to time in effect, with such reports and statements as may be prescribed by such Regulations. In the event that, for any reason, amounts in the Excess Investment Earnings Furd era insufficient to make the payments to the United States which are required by this Section, the Treasurer shall assure that such payments era made io the Vnited States, on a timely basis, Lrom any funds lawfully available therefor. SECTION 8.09. Further Obllaation of Treasurer. The Treasurer shall assure that Excess investment Earnings are not paid or disbursed except as required in this Article. To that end, the Treasurer shall assure that investment transactions are on an arm's length basis and that Non-purpose Obligations are acquired at their fair market value. In the event that Non-purpose obligations consist of certificates of deposit or investment contracts, investment in such Nor.-purpose Obligations shall be made in accordance with the procedures described in applicable Regulations as from time to time in affect. SECTION 8.10. Naintenanee of Racozds. The Treasurer shall keep, and retain for a period of six (6) yaara following the payment of the Bonfls in full, records of the determinations made pursuant to this Article. • SECTION 8.11. Independent Consultants. In order to provide for the administration of this Article, the Treasurer may provide Por the employment of independent attorneys, acccuntants and consultants compensated on such reasonable basis as the Treasurer may deem aoprooriate. CJ 17 /SS ARTICLE IX • DEFICIENCIES IN RFD MPTZON ND shallEnot be9ob11gatedOto+advance anydlawfullynavailable0funds to cure any deficiency which may occur in the Redemption Fund; provided that this determination shall not prevent the City, in its sole discretion, from so advancing such funds. SECTION 9.02. Title of Bond<. The determination not to advance lawfully available funds to cure deficiencies in the Redemption Fund shall ba clearly stated in the title of any Bonds issued representing unpaid assessments, pursuant to Section 8769 of the Streets and Highways coda. ARTICLE X SECTION 10.01. Redemption. Tha outstanding Bonds may be redeemed and paid in advance oP maturity upon the 2nd of March or 2nd o! September in any year by giving the notice provided by law and by paying principal and accrued interact together with a premium equal to . Three percent (3t) of the principal thereof. SECTION 10.02. Notice of Redemption. The notice shall specify the maturities o! the Bonds to be radnem.R ._~_< ~eciempcion sate and the place or places where amaunta due upon such redemption will be payable and, if less than all oL the bonds of any like maturity era to be redeemed, the letter and numbers or other distinguishing marks of each Bonds to be redeemed, and, in the case of a Bond to be redeemed in part only, such notice shall also specify the portion of the principal amount thereof to ba redeemed. SECTION 10.00. Fedemotion of Tess than n +re Bond. If there shall be called !or redemption less than all of a Bond, the City shall execute and the Paying Agent shall authenticate and deliver, upon the surrender of such Bond to the Paying Agent, without charge to the owner thereof, for the unredeemed balance of the principal amount of the Bond surrendered, a bond or bonds of the same maturity and of any authorised denomination. 18 /(oo ARTICLE XI PAYING AGENT SECTION 11.01. j~ppointment. The City Council hereby appoints Treasurer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as paying agent, authenticating agent, transfer agent and registrar for the Bonds. SECTION 11.02. ~poroval of Administrative Charges. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the paying Agent to collect administrative charges to defray expenses incurred in performing the services specified herein as may be authorized by law. ARTICLE XZI • SECTION 12.01. Intention of Covenants. It is the intention of the City that the interest paid on the Bonds be exempt Prom federal income taxation to the extent permitted under the Coda and from personal income taxation imposed by the State of . California and trierefore the City agrees to the covenants contained in this Article. SECTION 12.02. Compliance with Code and Regulations. The City represents and covenants, for the benefit of the Bond Owners. that „^f it t*o l~ct ^--d Ua~ Laeu pain or aeYeased, the City will comply with all requirements of the Code and all applicable Regulations. SECTION 12.07. G e a The City represents and covenants that: (a) The City is a governmental unit of general taxing powers. (b) Tha original Proceeds will be used, in part, to construct and acquire the Improvements and to pay costs and expenses incident thereto. (c) The Improvements are awned and operated by the-City, except for certain improvements that are under the ownership, manageme.^.t an3 control of other public agencies cr regulated public utilities. SECTION 12.04, Private Activ ity Hond P rohibition. The City represents and covenants that the Original Proceeds will not be used in a manner that would cause the Bonds to become ~arivate • 19 /b/ activity bonds" within the meaning of Section 141 of the Code, including: (a) No part oP the Original Proceeds will be used for any private business use within the meaning of Section 141 of the Code. (b) None of the payment o! the principal of or the interest on the Honds is directly ar indirectly secured by any interest in: (i) Property used or to be used for a private business use; or (iii Payments in respect to such property, or to be derived from such payments (whetrier or rot made to the City) in respect oP property, or borrowed money, used or to be used for a private business use, all within the meaning of Section 141 of the Cade. (c) None of the Original Proceeds will ba used directly, or indirectly, to make or finance loans to persons other than governmental units, within the meaning of Sectior. 141 of the Code. SECTION 12.05. Substantial Expenditure. The City represents and covenants that substantially all of the original • Proceeds and investment earnings thereon will be expended on or before May 1, 1990 SECTION 12.06. Investment of Proceeds. The City rar.-asa~a> >uu uovenants tnat: (a) The original Proceeds will not exceed the amount necessary to achieve the purposes stated herein and no portion of the Bonds is issued solely for the purpose of investing such portion at a materially higher yield (taking into account the discount) than the Yield on the Bonds. (b) The Redemption Fund has been established primarily to achieve a matching of revenues and payments due with respect to the Bonds in each year. Amounts deposited in the Redemption Fund will be depleted at least once a year except for a reasonable carry-over amount not to exceed one year's earnings on such Fund and all moneys deposited in such Fund will be expended within a thirteen (13) month period beginning on the date of deposit. T.`.e amount in the Redemption Fund will be invested without regard to yield, but in no event will the aggregate earnings on the Redemption Fund be permitted to exceed 5100,000 in any Band YeaY. If the aggregate earnings exceed 5100,000 in any Bond Year, than all amounts earned on the Redemption Fund shall be subject to Article VIii. 20 //~ } (c) A portion of the Original Proceeds in an amount not to exceed l0E of the Original Proceeds will be deposited into a • reasonably required Reserve Fund. At no time will the amounts deposited to the Reserve Fund be in excess of l0E of the Original Proceeds. Amounts held in the Reserve Fund will be invested without regard to yield. Amounts earned on the Reserve Fund will be subject to Article VIII. (d) No funds held by the City and pledged to the payment oP the Debt Service or the Bonds shall be invested so as to produce a yield in the excess of the Yield on the Bonds. (e) Notwithstanding the foregoing, any Original Proceeds and other amounts held in the Fund described above may be invested in obligations earning interest which is exempt from federal taxation under Section 103 of the 'Code, and any amounts earned from so investing shall not be subject to Article VIII. SECTION 12.07. Private Loan Use 'mttat' The City represents and covenants to assure that not in excess of the lesser of $5,000,000 or live percent (St) of the Net Proceeds of the Bonds is used, directly or indirectly, to make or finance a loan (other than loans constituting Non-purchase Obligations) to persons other than state or local government units. SECTION 12.08. Federal Guarantee Prohib rt ~.,, The City represents and covenants that: • (a) Neither the principal of nor the interest on the Bonds is directly or indirectly guaranteed in whole or in part by the United States or any agency or instrumentality of the ,...: «.,,a ~.....,. --- -' -- '- cause Lilo ueLL service or cne Bones to be federallyrguaranteed within the meaning of Section 149(b) of the Code or any Regulations. (b) No significant portion of the original Proceeds will be used to make any loan, the payment of principal or interest of which is to be guaranteed (in whole or in part) 6y the United States or any agency or instrumentality of the United States so as to cause the 1987 Certificates to be federally guaranteed within the meaning of Section 149(b) of the Coda or any Regulations. SECTION 12.09. prohibition Acainst Artifice or Device. The City represents and covenants that the Bonds are not and will not be part of a transaction or series of transactions that attempts to circuavert the provisicrs of Sacticr. 14a of the Code or any Regulations: (a) Enabling the City to exploit the difference between tax-exempt and taxable interest rates to gain material financial advantage; and • 21 i6 3 • (b) Increasing the burden on the market for tax-exempt obligations. SECTION 12.10. Pledged Revenues. The City represents and covenants that no revenues or amounts in other accounts or funds of the City are reserved or pledged for Debt Service or the Hords. SECTION 12.11. No Arbitrage. Tha City represents and covenants that the City shall not take, or permit or suffer to be taken, any action with respect to the Gross Proceeds of the Bonds which if such action had been reasonably expected to have been taken, or had been deliberately and intentionally taken, on the Closing Date would have caused the Bonds to ba an "arbitrage bond" within the meaning of Section 148 (a) oP the Code or any Regulations. SECTION 12.12. AealBtratlon. The City represents and covenants to cause the Bonds to be delivered (and transferred if requested) in fully registered form. S ECTZON 12.17. Amendment. Tha City represents and covenants to amend this Resolution and the assessment proceedings to make such additions, deletions or moditications as may be necessary to assure compliance with Section 168 (f) of the Cade relating to required rebate oP Excess Investment • Earnings to the United States or otherwise as may be necessary to assure exemption from federal income taxation of the interest on the Bonds. ARTICLE XIZZ SECTION 13.01. Covenant to Foreclosure. The City covenants that upon default oP any assessment payment due, it will cause foreclosure proceedings to ba brought within one hundred fifty (150) days of such default and thereafter diligently prosecute such proceedings to completion. Furthermore, the City covenants to bid the minimum of any delinquent amount at any foreclosure sale. SECTION 13.02. Unpaid Assessments as Trust Fund. The unpaid assessments shown on the Unpaid List presented to and determined by the City to be correct, together with the interest thereon, shall remain and constitute a trust fund for the redemption and payment of the Bonds and of the interest which may 6e due thereon. An installment of each assessment shall be payable in each year preceding the date of maturity of each of the several series of bonds which have been issued, sufficient to pay the bonds when due. 22 ~G y SECTION 17.03. Reassessment. IP any assessment • heretofore or hereafter issued is void or unenforceable, for any cause, or if Bonds are issued to represent or be secured by any assessments and such issuance is not effective through the curative provisions under Division 10 or Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code to make the Honds valid and enforceable, ther. a reassessment shall be made in the manner and form provided by Division 10. , SECTION 13.04. Tncontestab ility. After the sale and delivery of the Bonds by the City, the Bonds shall be incontestable by the City. SECTION 13.05. Contract with Bondowners. The provisions of this Resolution and of any other resolution supplementing or amending this Resolution shall const ituta ~a contract between the City and the Bondowners and such provisions shall be enforceable by any Bondowner for the equal benefit and protection of all Bondowners similarly situated by mandamus, accounting, mandatory injunction or any other suit, action or proceeding at law or in equity that is now or may hereafter be authorized under the laws of the State oL California in any court of competent jurisdiction. This contract is made under and is to be construed in accordance with the laws of the States of California. No remedy conferred hereby upon any Bondowner is intended • to be exclusive of any other remedy, but each such remedy is cumulative and in addition to every other remedy and may be exercised without exhausting and without regard to any other remedy conferred by law. No waiver of any default or breach of duty or contract or shall impair any right or remedies on said subsequent default or breach. No delay or omission oY any Bondowner to exercise any right or power accruing upon any default shall impair ary such right or power or shall be construed as a waiver of any default or acquiescence therein. Every substantive right and every remedy conferred upon the Bondowners may be enforced and exercised as often as may be deemed expedient. In case any suit, action or proceeding to enforce any right or exercise any remedy shall be brought or taken and should said suit, action or proceeding be abandoned, or be determined adversely to the Bondowners, then, in every such case, the City and the Bondowners shall be restored to their former positions, rights and remedies as if such suit, action or proceeding had not been brought or taken. SECTION 13.06. Cessat~g,D„og agreements. When all of the Bonds and ali inceresc to accrue thereon have been fully paid and discharged, the agreements in this Resolution shall cease and terminate, and the City shall be under no further obligation to do or perform any of the covenants, conditions or agreements in this Resolution. • 27 /6l • SECTION 13.07. Partial rnval idity. 2f any section, subsection, aentanca, clause or phrase of this Resolution shall be for any reason held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional, invalid or unenforceable, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Resolution and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase hereof irrespective of thn fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared to ba uneonstitutional, invalid or unenforceable, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. SECTION 13.08. Liberal Construction. This Resolution shall be liberally construed to the end that its purpose may ba effected. No error, irregularity ar informality and no neglect or omission herein ar in any proceeding had pursuant hereto which does not directly affect the jurisdiction of the City Council shall void or invalidate this Raaolutinn or such proceeding or any part thereof, or any act or determination made pursuant thereto. SECTION 13.09. Authorization to Authenticate. The Paying Agent is hereby authorized and directed to authenticate and deliver the Honds to the Unflerwriter upon payment of the purchase price thereof. • SECTION 13.10. Author+zation of Officers, The officers of the Oity are hereby authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to do any and all things and to execute and deliver any and all documents which they may deem necessary or advisable in order to consummate the issuance, sale and '- 'Yc~y vi Li,e nw,ua, and tittle rWl9e Lo eiieCLUatB the purposes ofythis Resolution, and such actions previously taken by such officers are hereby ratified and confirmed. SECTION 13.11. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective upon adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1987. AYES: NOES: ABSENT; CJ Dennis L. Stout, May.,r as /6~ ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk I, BEVERLY AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of , 1987. Executed this day of 1987, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk • 25 /67 E70DBT1' A UNUSED 5TA7E5 OF AMERICA SPATE OF CALIFtR~7IA CQRilY OF SAN FDIND (5 II~VII'gS7f E%1N0 (L.'K1SFD 0E3LIGATICNi FOND) CSTY OF FtANCED QICAt~G71 ASSF5.44Nf DLSiRICT NO. 86-2 II~ST FAZE MATURITY HATE BOND DATE PRINCIPAL AFflONf: pprrnn_c Under arcl by virtue of the "Tnprov®et~t Htrd Act o! 1915", being Division 10 loonvmreina w5 th .corti,+n otnn) ..i *~~ ~_-_ - - F-u'~y',~y~ ~e ~i ~'t~e State of California (the ~"Act") , the Cityro! PanrSmycxramuga, California (the "City") will, out o! the zederpt.ion Karl for the payment of the bonds issued upon the as^=°°^°^'a m~fa for the a~uisitrai ant anvhvction of caxtain public worio oP i~rwement in the AsaessIDV7t District, beirg Assessment District No. 86-2, mote Arlly described in Resolutim Of Intention No. (the "Resolution of intention"), adapted by the City Council of the City of F2trd'.o on the _ day of _, 19_, pay to the Registered Owner indicated above, or megistatad assigns, on the Maturity Date indicated above, the Principal Amami irrlicated above in lawful money of the United States of America, with interest thetea~ item the Artesdst Payment Date (as hereinafter defined) next preoedirg the date an which this bond is authenticated and registered, unless this band is autherticated and registered as of an Interest Payment Date, in whnidi ease it shall bear interest item said Interest Payment Date, or unless this bond is authenticated and registered prior to the first interest Payment Date, ~ which ease it shall bear interest free its date, until payment oP such principal sum hoe been diaCharrled, at the IrM-erest Pate indicated above per annum, at the office of the Ttaesuter of the City, as paying agent, registrar and transfer agent (the "Registrar"), located in the city of Poncho Cucamcrga, California (the "Principal Office"). A-1 /66 'Eais braid will cantirnre to Lear interest after maturity at the 7nte_rest • Fate above stated: provided, it is gxesented at maturity aryl payment hereof is refused upon the sole grtiad that there are not sufficient moneys in the rndemption find with wdrich to pay same. If it is not presertte3 at maturity, this bord will cease to bear interest at maturity. 'IIils bord shall rot be entitled to any benetit under the Act ar the pr.+.ee.+:,~,a ar become valil ar obligatory for' any Purpose, until the Certificate of Authentication and Registration hc~ecv; erdor.,ed shall have been dated std signed by ttla lrarrsfeY Agent and Registrar. 2TU.s bond is ma of several annual series of bonds of like date, tenor and effect, but differing in amanzts. interest rates aid maturities, issued by the City u}YjPY the Act arld the Resolution of IASUarVoe in the aggregate principal amount o£ Two Million Fifty Nine '1lwusard 'Sloan FDmdxerl Fifty One aryl 81/100 Wllars ($2,059,351.81) far the puupose of providing means for paying for the work and iagxwements des¢ibed Sn the Resolution of Intamiaf, and is secured by the moneys in the redemption ftad ¢xated under the p+*Y~++ ~ std by the unpaid -s ~-~^•a mmde for the payment of said work, ard, i7rludi~ principal and interest, is payable exclusively out of said Red. 'RVs interest is payable saaiannually to maturity, on the 2rd daY of Mazrh aryl 2rd day of September in each year hereafter (an "interest payment Cate"), to the registered owner hereof by dteclc or draft mailed to such owner at his address as it appears on the registration books of the Rngtctrrr, or at such address as may have been tiled with the Registrar for that purpose, as of the fifteenth day immediately preoedirq an Rrterest PaymaR Date; prwided, that • the first installment is far the interest tv the 2nd day of March, 1988, std thereafter, the interest installments are far the semiannual interest. the borxLa are issuable on1Y as fully registered bonds in denaairfations of $5,000 ar any integral mtltiple thereof, etn'eDt for' ane lrxN *y,.+_+^_~ <- - "V"'°'- ,"-:: cf r:,:...i.Ly wcucn ;.,..,odes the amotu[t by which the total Lsauer•~ °°''° the mwv;,m+m integral IDultiple oP $5,000 mr;tallled therein. his bond is transferable by the registered owner hereof Sn parson or by his attorney duly authorizes in writing at the PtS,nci.pal Office of the Registrar, subject to the terms and oaditions provided in the Registrar's systrm for transfer of registered debt obligations, including the payment of certain charges, if any, upon surrprider and cancellation oP this bond. UF+on such transfer a new registered bond ar bonds of arty authorized derxmiration or ~~^^^+~tions oP the same mattrr~tiea for the same aggregate principal amount, wi11 be issued to the transferee in exchange therefor. 'Eais bond, or a portion thereof if issued in a denomination greater than $5,000, shall be subject to redea{rtion and payment in advance of maturity in increments of $5,000 as provided in Section 8768 of the Act, on the 2nd day of Ya.-`. or 2nd day of Sep~_er5ar in arty Yom' bl' 4lvirg the rVOtice provided in the Act to the registered owner hereof at his address as St appears on the registration books of the Registrar and by paying principal of and accrued interest on such redeemed ano~art, together with a premium equal to three percent (3!) of the redeemed principal amount. It less than the t;tite bowl • is redeemed, the unrede~~ed portion shall ba reissued to the x+egistared owner thereof. A-2 /65 • II7 WTIIgSS Y~DP', the City has cawed this bold to be signed in facsimile hY the RY'esmaer of the City of Fatrt» QsBmuxp, Cnlifoznia, and by the City Clerk, std has mvead its msporaTi senl to la in facsimile henecn all m the _ day of ,1987. C13ZITFTCATE OF AVD62D•ICA.'1ZQ7 AND 1.iDGI.SlT+ATiRf 'Dais Bond has been authen- ticated and pegs are.w rn CLZ7C OP RANCi37 R~7C,A, CALIFC¢dJSA 8y: City Clerk By: Trene,re. [mil crrfr of aAra~n a~aaa, m as 2Yansfer Agent and Regist<ar ay: r~u orarlnr the apinirn of Bald Caimsel is +M+~^^~+-~+ hnnvtq and mode a part hereot by retenerne. 2anrsFIIts AND ExC~ti[$5 'Ain Bad is tranefesable only upm ttr bad ryister kept for that gupoea at the offic9 of the Tnaifsfar Agent aid lbgistrar by tY1e negistatred owner hereof in pennon, or by his nttornay duly autorized Sn writing, upon the surretdpr of this Bald together with a written Snstntsoant of transfer satisfactory to the Tnarfsfnr Agent and Registrar duly e~aecuted )ry the registered owner ar his attanney. A-3 ~ 70 ASSIC1Sff27f • For value reoaived the lmdea:signed does hereby sell, assign and txa[mter unto the vit3un-mentimed iaegisteted Eard aed hereby isxavaca6ly ouietituta(s) acid appoint(s) to transfer the same an the boob of tha Trarmfer Agent alr! Registzar with foil paver of subetitzrtlon in the premises. Ihted: .. . Notice: 'ih8 aseiglwr's eicgiatlae to this assign- IDeilt mlait OolLBRpQ1d With the name as it appeazs ltpwt the face of the within Bald in wezy m.+imlw~, Without altaratim GR' any Cbalx~e Whatever. $ignatllre fiUaCdiltee: • • A-4 / 7/ STAFF REPORT ~^ ~%~~~ ~', s.~1 ~~ 191 DATE: April 15, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager PROM: Robert A, Rizzo, Ass.i slant City Manager BY: Jerry H. Fulwood, Assessment Revenue Coordinator • SUBJECT: Approval of Resolution Passing On Reappgrtionment Report For Paace'_ MoD 9870 Within The Sixth Street Industrial Park Refunding' DistricC (82-SRI, Giving Preiiminarv ADDroval, and Setting a Time and Place For Public Rearing. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Resolution Passing on Reapportionment Report for Parcel Map 9610 within The Sixth Stree[ Industrial Park Refunding District (B2-1R), giving preliminary approval, and setting a time and place fgr the public hearing. EVALUATION: During fiscal year 1986/87 a property subdivision occurred within The Sixth Street Industrial Park Refunding District (62'1R). This has necessitated the reapportionment of unpaid assessments on subdivided properties. The Resolution Passing on Reapportionment Report Preliminarily approves the reapportionment report and sets the t!me and place for the public hearing for May 20, 1987 a[ 7:30 p.m. at the Lion's Community Center, Rancho Cucamonga, California. .'Resperrf+,;l i`yeS'lbmi rrgd, R~-A / ZO Assista City Manager RAR:JBF:kmm / 7 )- /s9 RESOLUTION NO. Q7 -~ RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, PASSING ON REAPPORTIONMENT REPOP.T, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, has previously confirmed assessments in a special assessment dls tract pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and bonds were Sasued to represent the costs !or unpaid assessments pursuane to the terms and provisions of the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", being Division 10 of said Code, said special assessment district known and designated as • ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.H2-1R ;hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"}; and, WHEREAS, subsequent thereto, certain lots and/or parcels of land which there are ,,.,P~~,1 apportioned or divided, and this^leglslative body has ordered the preparation of and has now received a "Reapportionment Report" setting forth the segregation and aPPortionmene of the unpaid installments of the original assessments, all as authorized by Part 10 of the "Improvement Bond Aci of 1915 specifically commencing with Section 8730 thereof; and, SEC?ION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. / 73 NOW, '!'HEREPORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION ^e. That the report entitled "Reapportionment Report" setting forth certain segregations and apportionments of the unpaid installments of the original assessments for the Assessment District is hereby received, preliminarily approved and ordered to placed on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the legislative body, SECTION 3. That the proposed segregations and apportion- ment~ as set forth in the Reapportionment Re- port, are hereby approved in the amounts set forth and for the respective lots or parcels as set forth in said Report. Reference in hereby made io said Report for all particulars as !t relates to the proposed segregations and reapportionments. SECTION 6. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT ON WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF MAY 1987, AT THE HOUR OP 7:30 O'CLOCK P.M., IN THE REGULAR MEETING • PACE OP THIS LEGISLATIVE BODY, LOCATED AT THE LION'S PARK, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA., IS THE TIME AND PLACE FIXED FOR THE HEARING UPON THE PROPOSED AMENDED ASSESSMENTS. ALL ~~~~~~~~~ _ _c cvccue~rm ~ ~ ~ 1' THEREBY , OR IN THE LANDS AFFECTED OR IN THE BONDS SECURED THEREBY, MAY, AT THE TIME OP THE HEARING OR AT THE TIME TO WHICH THE HEARING MAY BE CONTINUED, APPEAR AHD PROTEST AGAINST THE AMENDED ASSESSMENT. WRITTEN OBJECTIONS TO THE AMENDED ASSESSMENT ARE TO BE FILED WITN THE CITY CLERK OP THE LEGISLATIVE BODY EY ANY INTERESTED PERSON AT ANY TIME NOT DATER THAN THE TIME SET FOR THE HEARING. SECTION 5. That the Citv_Clerk of the legislative body shall, immediately following the adoption of this Resolution, cause notice to be made, pur- suant to Section 6061 of the Government Code of the State of Ca l!fornia, by having a copv of this Resolution published in the DAILY REPORT, said publication to be made two (2) times with the first publication to be com- pleted at least fifteen (161 days prior to the date set for the public hearing. • 7'1 ~~ • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIdONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: T0: FROM: 8Y: SUBJECT: April 15, L987 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director Linda D. Daniels, Senior Redevelopment Analyst SET PUBLIC NEARING FOR MAY 6, 1987 TO CONDUCT A TEFAA HEARING FOR 7NE PROPOSED REFL!°DIN„ OF REDEYEL OPMENT AGENCY B4-I TAX ALLOCATION BONDS As part of the new Tax Reform legislation, it is required that, prior to any refunding of a bond, the legislative body of the jurisdiction hold a public hearing known as a "TEFRA" hearing. This hearing, required by the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act, provides the opportunity for interested parties to make comments about the proposed pond refunding. Since the City Council is the Iegis la Live body for the jurisdiction where the bonds were Sold it is necessary for the Council to hold the TEFRA bearing. On May 6, 1987 staff expects to be prepared to present the complete bond refunding package far Redevelo;."e nt Aymicy consideration. A ,ioint me^ti,;g of the Council and the Agency is "b2Jvied ror that evening, At that time the Agency will consider the bond documents, which include the Official Statement, the Resolution of Issuance, a purchase contract, and the overall bond structure. At the same joint meeting the Council will conduct a public hearing which complies with the requirements of the TEFRA legislation, Respectfully submitted, Jack Lam, AICP Community Development Director JL:GJ:kap ~ ~,~CAMp~~, ~/( ~? °ii x F, a ~z ~„ > 1471 r 7a STAFF REPORT ~~ DATE: April 15, 1987 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Otta Kroutil, Senior Planner BY: Miki Bratt, Assistant Planner ~~~.KO>h t~~- F' C ir, SUBJECT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRAN1 APPLICATION FISCAL YEAR ev ew o na o ammun ec fives and selection of projects for the fiscal year 1987-BB, based on an anticipated grant of 1409,000. • I. RECOMIIEMDATION: It is reta~ended that the City Council adopt the a c eso cation approring Lhe final statement of Cawsunlty Oo,{ectives and selecting certain projects for funding in FY 1987- 88; and authortziny the ryor to sign; and directing the staff to submit the application for Coa~untty Devd opment Block Grant (00861 funds for these prolects to the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HU01. li. BACKGROUMO: On March 18, 1987, the L1ty Council held a public ar no discuss the caawunttv's oot actives far the cOB6 erovram and to set priorities among all the projects sugygested by City staff, cal~wnity organizations, and residents for funding in 1987- 88. The basis for that discussion was the Preliminary Statement of Caswunity OW actives. Tne Ctty Council listened to public testimony and after considerable discuszion made a preliminary selection of projects and gave staff direction as follows: o Continue funding for the Residential RehaDilltatton Grant and Loan progru, 1106,000; o Cantlnue funding for the Senior Shared Housing Program, f5, 300; o Shift the focus of COBG funded public improvements from the North Town Neighborhood (wnere ellgibie improvaaents have been completed or are in praessl to Southwest Cucaaonga; o Fund Street Improvements to Southwest Cucamonga in the amount of f215,000; / 7L City Council Staff Report CDBG APPLICATION FY 1987-88 April 15, 1981 Page 2 C o Develop a acre detailed description of the inproveaN!nts needed an each street and the estiautted cost of those isproveaients to oe used to deterotne the logical phasing of the work in the taryet area; and o Although a site is not currently available, include park acquisition as part of Southwest Cucaoonga iwprovenent proyrae. On April 1, 1987, the Engineering Division subwtitted a report on the TaprovseMS needed in the Southwest Cutaapnga neighborhood, along with estlMted costs by street, for the Council's consideration. (A copy of their report is attached.) Based on that discussion, we are recaastending the following phasing of public iprovsents in the area, including but not Molted to reconstruction of the street aiW instailatton of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and street lights: Phase IaOrove~ents Cost I Street 1~proveaNUKs (north of Arrw Highway) • a. Yta Car111o 5208,000 b. Sierra Madre 6 Placida Court 5188,000 c. Avenida Yelar 5153,000 Total SS;g;pp0 "W ureuta j%LO,UVU (between Arrow Mlgnwey and 9th Street) III Street ieprovea~ents 5484,000 (south of 9th Street) IV Arrow Highway S2%,000 Y 9th Street 5350,000 In suaasary based on previous Council direction, the pra,fects selected for funding in 1987-88, and the amount of funding for each would De: a. Housing Rehabilitation 5106,000 D. Senior Shared Housing S 6,300 • / 77 city council Staff Report COBG APPLICATION FY 1987-88 April 15, 1981 Page 3 • c. SM Cucaiaorlga Street teproveeents: (Phase I streets (north of Arrow NighwaY) Design and construction ' tagrovewents for Yta Carillo with a a>argin for contingencies f215,000 d, Progru AdelMstratton (including fair Noosing) f 81,700 Total anticipated funding fp09,DOD Federal rogulatlons require a public hearing on the proposed progra~ prior to selection of projects for funding and approval of the F1na1 Siatsent of Caaawnity Objectives and Ca~unity Derelopeb~ and Noosing Plan for suM ttal to NUD. Ona you have glwn tMt approwl, tlr docualenL and the 1987-88 pr ae cost be subaitted far enWronaKMal and state and nglonal clearinghouse review. Then the Final Statealent of Caaaunlty Objectives and any coa~ents received fra Lhe pu611c or the clearinghouses will be sudaitted to NIA LogetMr with the 1981-88 funding appllatton. • Motice of the puDltc baring was published on April 6, 1987. RespecU~illy subaitted, •.e ; I"gr ~, UL[o RreUtll Senior Planner OK:MB:vc AttachaKnts 7Y RESOLUTION N0.~7-t9~ /9'~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHD CUCAMONGA, CALIFOIINIA ADOPTING THE FINAL STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY 08JECTIVES ANO SELECTING PRQIECTS FOR FUNDING FOR THE COMNINITY OEYELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PRO6RAN Fpt FISCAL YEAR 1987-88. NHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cutaspngs is an Entitlement City under Lhe reputations governing the Caeawnity Development block Grant Program; and NHEREAS, notice of the avallaDfllty of funds for eligible projects wasd publlsned in the Da11y Report and soiled to interested comsgnity groups; NHEREAS, the City Staff has received proposals for projects and programs Fran vartous organizations in the Coaawnlty; and NNEREAS, the City Staff has conducted a needs assessment to determine program eligibility and needs; and NNEREAS, the C1ty Council Ms hN d a Legally noticed public hearing in order to give tM pu611c an opportunity to respond to staff recaataendattons for program funding and to put forth for Council consideration reto~endatlons of their own; and • NHEREAS, the C1ty Councii has heard public testimony and received all puDHC input regarding the City's Community Development 81ock Grant Program Por the next program year. NON, THEREFORE DE IT RESCLYED, that the C1ty Council of the City of _~_ ,. ....D-.... eu:.::6ay: wei nni iw~ uAe Lila iui iVlli ng aG[i Ona: 1. Approve the Final Statement of Casmnntty Objectives and Comwnlty Development and Housing Plan 2. Select funding for the following projects and programs to Oe funded out of the City's Coamunity Developsent Block Grant award: Project/Program Amount a. Housing Rehab111tattan 5106,000 b. Senior Shared Housing f 6,300 c. SM Cucamonga Street Iaprovements Phase I streets (north of Arrow M) ghway design and construction of improvements for W a Car111o 5215,000 /79 C1 ty Council Resolution No. CDBG APPLICATION FY 1487-88 April 15, 1987 Page 2 d. Proyram Ad•inistration (including Fair Mousing) 81,700 TOTAL 5409.000 3. Authorise Mayor to sign the application for Community Development Block Grant funds included in the Final Statement of Caanunlty Ob,~ect/ves. • • ~~O - C[TY OF RA,~ICHO CUCAbIONG,~ ~~cs.srp~ STAFF REPORT ~. ~~ DATE: April 1, 1987 c~ ~= T0: City Council and Lity Manager ~I ~ '> 1977 FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Rfchard Cota, Fssociate Livil Engineer SUBJECT: Update of Estimated Construction Costs for Street and Alley Improvenents to be funded by Community Development Block Grant Funding for the Southwest Cucamonga Neighborhood: Yta Carrillo, Placida Court, Avenida Vel ar, Ca~3ver as Avenue, Salina Avenue, Sierra Madre Avenue, Vinmar Avenue, Ninth Street and Arrow Route Background/Analysis As requested by the City Council at its March 18, 1987 meeting, attached is a tabulation, street by street, of updated estimated costs for roadway and alley improvements proposed to be funded by the Community Development 81ock Grant (CDBG) Funding. These figures are for information purposes only. The estimated costs cover construction, contract adnfnistratton, • contingencies and design. The improvements proposed include roadway and alley pavement reconstruction; the installation of street lights, Portland Cement Concrete curb, gutter, cross-gutters, spandrels, sidewalk and drive approaches, as well as pavement markings and signing. It should he noted that the Southern California Edison Company will not install marble poles and Tlluntnares where curb and gutter improvements ~ do not exist. Also, restrictions placed oy wati rur nng oasicaiiy prohibit the formation of Assessment Districts for the construction/instalation of street light but not the maintenance thereof. Estimates not covered are the possible installation or replacement costs of items such as sewer and water supply facilities. Also, for Arrow Route and Ninth Street, potential right-of-way acquisition estimated costs are not provided. Considering the tabulated results and the knowledge that CC. s funding allocated yearly approximates 5215,OOOt/fiscal year, it is ap;. -ent that most of the single proposed project could be scheduled only on a yearly basis unless additional COBG or other revenue sources are provided. L"J the Engineering Staff therefore desires Council direction for priority scheduling of design/construction of the various proposed street improvements for CDBG funding. R esp -Lf submitted, . d '^ A tt /~/ SET NAME LIMITS ESTIMATED IlPROYElE11T CD5T5 [ Arrow Route From Grove Avenue 5296,000.00 • Just east of Sierra Madre Avenue Ninth Street From Grove gvenue to 5350,000.00 Just east of Baker Avenue Via Carrillo Fran Avenida Velar f208,000.00 to east of Canet Street Placida Court Fran Sierra Madre f 56,000.00 Avenue west to Cul de Sac Avenida YeJar Between Grove and 5153,000.00 + Sierra Madre Avenue Calaveras Avenue a) Between Ninth Street (270,000.00 +* and Arrow Route b) Fram Ninth Street f149,000.00 *++ p~ i y - 625t eet 5outh ' Sierra Madre Avenue a) Between Arrow Route 5132,000.00 * and Vta Carrillo • b) Between Arrow Route (249,000.00 •+ and Ninth Street c) Fran Ninth Street 5149,000.00 *** Sep. . . •zat .;o~G~ Virmar Avenue a) Fram Salina Avenue f 71,000.00 ++ north to Cul de Sac b) Fram Ninth Street to 2135,000.00 *++ approximately 61St feet Sauth Salina Avenue Between Calaveras and 5138,000.00 *+ and Sierra Madre A}ley parallel to and From 195 feet E/0 Grove E 51 000.00 *++~ south of Ninth Street Avenue to 175 feet E/0 , Sierra Madre Avenue C~ /P> PAGE 2 " Subtotal of torts for streets north of Arrow E 549,000.00 Route ** Subtotal of costs for streets between Arrow 728,000.00 Route and Ninth Street *** Subtotal of costs for streets and alleys 484,000,00 so uth ,of Ninth Street ~~~ TOTAI f1, 761,000.00 d:r • /83 Sri; !• r1 LJ -~ r-- SOUTHWE3T Ci1CAdAONGA ~C:: 7777 Aru quallfyin9 iT` i for CDBG tondo CI 1 1~ ~l' ~ N~~U~d ~tr~~t R.-~\C~:O CL:C-X110\G~ Impr°rBm°nts PL:\~'iVl\G DI\'LiO~! E\HIOIT SC>L[~ /s'y - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c~U,++o STAFF REPORT F~~ 6 • OATE: April 15, 1981 19'~ T0: Mayor and Mabers of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Dl anner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA PLANIIEO COMIMINITY - e reques anon errs s anne oawun Dy establishing a Business Park Overlay Zone for areas designated as Office Park, Cot•ercial, and Mixed Use, within the planned coaxunity ooundary. I. RECOMIENDATtON: Staff recaa~ends that the City Council affina the n ngs he Planning Lonelssion and deny the Terra Yista Planned Coaasunity Anendnent. A Resolution of Dental has been attached for your review. . II. BACKGROUND: The proposed aasendnant would allow, subject to a on ono Use PenNt, a Business Park Overlay Zone in areas designated for Office, Caarterclal or Mixed Use. The purpose of Lois Business Park Overlay Zane is to provide for nu1N-tenant projects fostering saw11 business developaunt. These types of "incubator" spaces would D! Urgeted at tDe sawn business users woo require a conoination or uiiica anu waraiwaaa l~ya ;yaca, .1tG the office use expanding over tine to fill out host of the building area. In addition to the uses perwitted by the base zone, the Overlay Zone would allow other land uses Lhat range fran adninistrattve and professional use, retail and service use to custom nanufacturing uses listed in Exhibit 'A". The Planning Coa~isston on February 25, 1987 regular aueting reviewed the tM rd revisions of this Droposed aa~endaent, considered all public input, and rccowaended for dental to the City Louncll. The following section suanartzes the Planning Caawission's Doses for the recaneendatlon of denial. III. ANALYSIS: A. Conflict of Land Uses: The Proposed anendaw!nt would allow ' cus in s r a evelopax!nt in a residentially planned connunity. The Planning Caa~isston stated that the Industrial Specific Plan provides nearly 4,000 acres of developable land that is properly zoned for the type of uses proposed. The Terra Y1sta Planned Ceaasunity is conceived as a series of residential neighborhoods linked together by caasaon recreational and institutional functions. The planned /g CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TERRA VISTA PLANNED COlMUNITY AMENDMENT 86-02 April 15, 1987 Paye 2 • developsent is divided into four neighborhoods with the two northerly neighborhoods Wore residentially orienkd while the southern neighborhoods have a M gher portion of land devoted to caaoercial and atlxed use. The purpose of these cawercially zoned areas south of Church Street is to provide transition uses to the industrial area south of Foothill Boulevard and transition k the residential district north of Church Street. The proposal k allow lndustrtal uses within Terra Vista is ~~n~,.ry w cne runeawentai kn~ o-- zi-'own nc e a uses sou s ra avo a nu sauce. re ore, ann ng a~ ss on s a a o ng industrial uses would erode the inknL of tM Terra Vista Planned Caaeunity and not De in the best Interest of the City of Rancho Cutaagnga. B. Inconsistent with General Plan and Relatlonshl k the n s r a c an: ann ng ss on s a a a ng n s r a uses awy trae the Industrial Specific Plan area boundary mould erode the /Mant of the Industrial Specific Plan. Also, ailowing certain commercial uses within the Business Park Overlay Zone such as appliance stores and repair, • pluebing shops and supplies, television and radio sales and repair, floor covering sales and instailat/on, and other retail and services businesses would expand ca~n^c1a1 land uses Into acres not intended for these types of uses. This would conflict with City-wide rogulations of the Develoo.enr. r.~d. ,~n cue ueneral Pian which esLaDlish a wrefui balance of coaraercial, office, industrial and residential tend uses. Copies of the Planning Coawisston staff report and ninutes which fully describe the proposed aax3ndeent and the Planning Cowission discussion are attached for your inforaation. Res tfull ltted, Brad 1 er City tanner BB: NF ae Attachatents: February 25, 1987 Planning Cowsisslon Staff Report and Minutes Planning Co~isslon Resolution Recattaending venial City Council Resolution of Oenial • /8G STAFF REPORT DATE: February 25, 1987 T0: Chairaen and Mealbers of the Planning Coaadssion FROM: Brad Butler, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY ~.+cw,wa:n~ w-vc - ec~lcwe ncweniia - me request to sax errs s ann n by estaD11sh1ng a Buslnass Park Overlay Zone far areas designated as Offtce Park, Coawerctal and Nixed Use, within the planned coasaunlty boundary. I. ABSTNACT: The developer 1s requesting for recaaasendation of approval for issuance of the negative declaration and approval of the Coawunlty Plan Aweiid~aeilt to create a 'Business Park Overlay Zone.' II. BACKGROUND: - ^laraiay CG°w1;;14n w, ieuru.ry ii, i9ei continued tnis proposed Planned Coa~xinlty Aaleridaent to this regular aieeting, at the request of the applicant. The developer hes sudattted a third ~eviston to Lhe list of proposed laM uses as shown in Exhibit A". Attached for your review is a teller fray the applicant responding to staff analysts of Deceaber 10, 1986 Planning CoaeHSSton staff report. The following section is staff analysis on this revised proposed aalendeent. III. ANALYSTS: A, EstaDlishaw!nt of a Business Park Overl Zone: The purpose o s over ay zone actor ng veloper, is to provide for aul ti-tenant protects fostering Sax111 business development. These types of °incubator° spaces would be targeted toward shall business uses who require a caalbinatlon of oN1te and warMouse type span, with the office use expanding over dale to fill out most of the building area. In addition W the uses penltted by the base zone, the Overlay Zone would allow other land uses 19ii /~7 ITEM Q G CA.tiO~ I ~~. a _; Fi Q PLANNING CdeMI SStOi 'AFF REPORT TERRA VISTA PLANNED ~JlBII1NITY AMENDMENT a6-02 NESTERN PROPERTIES February 25, 1987 Page 2 that range fro~a adainistrative and professional use, retail and servitt use to custa~ aanufacturing use as listed in Exhibit 'A". Staff CosrML: Th1s Dropased aeendaent would allow, su ec a andltlonal Use Peradt, Business Park Overlay Zone in areas designated for Office,Gow•ercial, or Mixed Use. !n responding to staff's October 10, 1986 Planning Coa~lssion report, the developer 1s proposing to lbit the areas where such Overlay Zone could be estaDllshed within the Planned Caa~nlty boundary as shown to Exhibit "B". The developer, as stated to the attached February lO, 1986 letter, clarified that each Business Park project would be processed as a CaM1t1oM1 Use Peradt to afford the City additional review and control. Most of the land uses proposed within the Business Park Overlay Zones are alreagy per,•lttad ar condttlonally permitted within the following N zed use zaniny designations: MFC (Flnanclal, Restaurants, Residential), MOC (Mixed Use. Office, Caaaaeretall, and MNO iNospltals, Office, Caawero1a11, as shown in Exhibit 'C". Therefore, creating a Business Park Overlay Zone within these caaaarrclal designations would • st111 be redundant, except for areas designated as Office Park. The priabry Issue, then, becanes those new uses yreposed that would M 1n addition to hose uses already allowed in the base zone. A lame artrtx chart with coaparlsons of the land uses allowed within Otflce and Mixed Use w111 De available at the eeeting for your review. RaeaaawaMatia: The proposed anendaent should allow, su ec a Condltlonal Use Per~1t review Drocess, Business Park protects 1n areas designated for Offlee Perk only. Th1s would eliadnate unnecessary redundancy and abintaln the Integrity of the Cawaerclal and Mixed Use Zones. in addition, the proposed definition of the Business Park Overlay Zone which includes "office and warehouse type space" should be wodified with the intention of discouraging wrehouse type industrial use by changing it to read "otflce and 11aNted storage area". 8. Uses Permitted in Business Park Overlay Zone: 1. Th1s section starts with 'adadnlstratlve offices" and ends with "auta~otive service station (CUP)" and as listed below: • /8Q PLANNI N6 OOMMISSI01 'AFF REPORT TERRA VISTA PLANNED ~OMR1NiTY AMENDMENT 8602 NES7ERN PROPERTIES February 25, 1987 Page 3 o AdsiM strattve offices o Professional offices including, but not 11aHted to, professions such as accounting, law, Tncaak tax, insurance, arcAitecture, engineering, aasdicine, optoaN!try, chiropractic, podiatry, osteopathy, dentistry, real estate, escrow, financial brokerage, securities brokerage, and interior design. o Retail and service businesses serving the needs of office users including, but not 1ladted to, printers, stationers, secretarial servtees, office wppltes and equlpuent, ofitee aychlne sales and service, and aw!ssanger and postal serrfas. o Caanaretal recration faN11t1es cap1Wpattbl• with offtee use, . including, but not 11Httd to, health clubs or (CUP), racquet ball courts ICUP1. o Banks and other financial ^ct! •a t! oa: o Eating and drinking establlshaients o Autoawblle service stations (CUP) Stiff Counts: A review of these types of proposed uses n ca s that they parallel those uses allowable by tM City's Oevelopsent Code within the Office/Prolesslanal District. Therefore, the proposed land uses as listed above are acceptable. RacoxandaLlan: Approve the above section of land uses n • Business Park Overlay Zone. 2. This next section starts with 'retail studios, stores, and associated workshops" and ends at "interior design" as listed bales: ~J /87 PLANNING COMMI SSIOF 'AFF REPORT TERRA YI STA PLANNED ..JMMUN ITY AMENDMENT 86-02 WESTERN PROPERTIES February 25, 1987 Page 4 • a Retail studios, stores, and ass«tated worksho s for the desl n, fabrication, an sae of handaa~r cus « or us ness and rest-edn a uses ncluding, but not flatted to the fallowing, which eaboQy custaatzed design and/or hand craftsaanship rather than aechanized prod«tton, providing such use does not constitute a nuisance to adJolning uses by reason of noise, vibration, partlcuiates, odors, hazards, or fragrant or large scale transport and suD,ject to the approval of the City Planner: Jerelry, wearing apparel and accessories, stained glass wares, picture fraaes, quilts, araalcs, glass, leathergoods, auslcal lnstruaw:nts, pottery, housewares, gifts, art and craft peas, photographs, fashion • design, interior design. Staff Caveats: The appltunt has atteapted to ed n-ft a aoreipecifically the scope of the land uses for the proposed rotail studio, stores and ass«iaud woricsnop. tssentially, the revisions clarify that these uses should be retail establishaents rwtose products are intended for business and residential uses. Virtually all products are consuaed or used by a business or residential user; Lhercforc this does not further define the scope of allowable uses. However, allowing studios or workshops which fabricate custoa-wade products as listed above is oblectlonable, as it 1s inconsistent with the intent of the Terra Y1sta Cosaunity Plan and the City's General Plan. The custaa-ride and fabrlcatlon types of products are sDeclf1ca11y defined by the City's Industrial Speclfle Pi an as custaa aanufacturing. Allowing these industrial uses within Terre Y1sta would violate the fundaaental tenant of :ontng: The separation of incapatible land uses. Certainly, a "design studio" or "artist studio' would not be ob,lettionable, 1t is the fabrlcatlon of these products that is of concern. The applicant could 11a1t the scope of the above proposed land use by • /90 PLANNING COMMI SSIOA 'AFF REPORT TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 86-02 NESTERN PROPERTIES February 25, 1987 Page 5 • defining further the! this type of land use involves office use, shwrropa and associated workshop that is 11aNted to art and craft ite~s such as ,jewelry, quilts, photographs, picture fra~es, ceraNlcs,' potteries, and specialty small gifts. Racoa~tlen: Staff recas~ends that this section o propos uses be Menged as follows: Retail studios, stores, and associated workshops for the purpose of sales, office, showroa~, and design with workshop for wsta~-~sde saagles of products for display only 1n the sharroo~a far the following types of art and craft hers: Jawlry, picture frams, quilts, cerarlcs, potteries, specialty gift itasK. Custar- Mda censuer goods within sWdlos, stores and associated workshops ray De allowed provided tMt the custon-~ada cansu~er goods aro ancillary to the studios ar • stores and do not exceed 20 percent of the leased floor arH; and wb~ect to City Planner approval. 3. This section started with 'retell and service Duslnesses serving the needs of residential Yi,ll'.1 , a,w ands ac 'cicxec sales, etc.' as follows: o Retail and service businesses serving the needs of residential users, including, but not 1lsdted to the follawtny and subject to the approval of the City Planner: Appliance sales and repair, plurbing supplies and repair, television and radio sales and repair, floor, wall, and window covering sales and lnstallatlon, paint and hash! decorating stores, catering establlshrents, contractors (excluding contractor's yardsl, treauty supply stares, fabric stares, shoe repair shops, antique dealers, security device saUs and service, telephone sales, luggage sales, pet grooadng and supplies, dance studios, opticians, redlcal supply sales anc / 9/ PLANNING CdMISSION AFF REPORT TERRA VISTA PLANIIED ~OMMUNI TY AMENDMENT 86-02 NESTERN PROPERTIES February 25, 1987 Page 6 • ~ rental, electrical, electronic, data processing, and telecansun/canons sales and service, audio/video sales and service, furniture sales, upholstery shops (except autoaxdtile upholsteryl, apparel shops, and siadlar businesses. o Convenience retell aM service businesses such as food and beverage sales, newsstands, bookstores, barber and beauty shops, cleaners, Lrcvel bureaus, photo developing, tuxedo rental, bicycle sales and repair, locksnlth, ticket sales, etc. 54ff Co>•ats: These types of cannerctal uses arc a rea e r pernltted or condlttanally pernltted within arcs 1n the Terra Ytsta Planned Ca~unity designated for nixed use (IFC, MDC, and MIN)) except for Office Park District. Therefore, allowing expansion of Lhasa types of uses only within the . Office Psrk D1stHCt would ellninate redundsncy and naintaln the degree of distinction and balance between caanercial, office and elxed use type districts within the Terra Y1sta Planned Cos~nity. c.~~.w.. .use ~_ t<-ir,ii tni: u,e iuiiuwiny iiais of land uses are lnconpatiDle to Office Park type of land uses: o Appliance store and repair, p1unDing shops and supplies, television and radio sales and repair, These types of uses Involve Large Household hens, servlee area for repair and warehousing which is indtcatlve of intensive caanercial use and would not b! compatible to office uses. o Floor, well, and window covering sales and lnstatlatlon, paint and hone decorating stores. Aga1n, these types of land uses could involve large showman, and warehousing which is indtcatlve of an industrial use. However, these types of uses arc closely related to . /g} PLANNING COMA SSION AFF REPORT ~~ TERRA VISTA PLANNED ~OIMUNITY AMENDMENT 86-02 NESTERN PROPERTIES February 25, 1987 Page 7 • interior designing, therefore, by changing 1t to interior design office with shawroast, but without warehousing of products, could be acceptable. o Upholstery shops (except autoeob7le uphoi stery ). housMOld hens anwchSQascafurntiturc v aiMar9s 1ndlcaLive of a custan ^enufacturing use which is tncagat161e to Otflce Park type of tend use. o Dance sWdtos. Danes swdlos should be classified as ce~arclal recraatton faeillttes and a Condittonai Use Pendt should be trod to Mwre Its operation would not adversely tapact (e.g. noise) other tenants. • Raee~an4tian: Staff recoanends that the above s o uses, neoapaLible to olflce tYpa of uses, be altainattd frw tMS itat, while dance studio should be anved to cawrefal recreation fac111ttes as a condttianaliy penaitted land use. 4. Th1s section starts Fran "caaaunity fac111t1es as specified above' and mds at "parking requirenenLS .approved by the Planning Caawisstan' as follows: o Coateunity fac111t1es as specified above. o Accessory structures and uses necessary or custaeary incidental to the above uses. o Other uses which are /ound Dy the Planning CoaolasiM to be con;intent with the spirit and intent of this land use ciassiflcatton. o Parking rcqulrenents for business ,~ arks shall De the sane as for Office Barks unless otherwise approved Dy the P~anning Cawtsslon. /93 PLANNI N6 COMMI SSSOA AFF REPORT TERRA VISTA PLANNED ~OIMUNITY AMENDMENT 86-02 NESTERN PROPERTIES February 25, 1987 Page B L Skff Col•alltt: The above land use languages are accep e. Reeoa~dstlon: Approve the above section of the an uses n the Business Park Overlay Zone. IV. ENYIRQNMENTAL ASSESSMENT: As a result of the initial study, staff has dekrsr7ned that the proposed anendeent auly have Lhe following pokntial signtftcant adverse isgacts: 1. The proposed aaendeent by adding custo~ manufacturing industrial type of land uses substantially alkrs the present planned land use of the Terrs Yisk Planned Ca~munlty and the General Plan. 2. The proposed aarndmment would conflict M th the oblecttves and policies of the Gerteral Plan and the Industrial Spaciflc Plan. • 3. AS a result of the proposed aeendxnt 1n adding costae mwtnufecturing industrial uses within the residentially planned caaeuMty, truck traffic would increase substantially, adding traffic hazards to im-it0i 7eiiC lei, u11.y~115La OOO peaestr~ans. 4. Asa result of this proposed amw!ndeent, people oay be exposed to an increase 1n health, safety, and nuisance factors such as none, odors, or industrial accidents. Haamaver, rlth the suggested chaeges by staff, a negattre dstlantton could be prapand as the above land use adverse impact could be dttgeted. V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: [n considering the proposed amaendeent to the Terra Vista Planned Community, the Planning Comalssion oust make the following findings: 1. The amM!ndmbnt does not conflict with the land use policy of Lhe 6enenl Plan, 2. The amKndsknt does prompte the goals of the land use • elemVtnL, and ,9y PLANNING COMMI SSI01 AFF REPORT TERRA YISTA PLANNED ~OMlR1NITY AMENDMENT 86-02 NESTERN PROPERTIES February 25, 1987 Page 9 3. The asendsent would not be tsatertally 1n~urious or detristental to aQiacent properties. V1. CORRESPONDENCE: This is a continued public hearing nets frog October 8, 1986, NovesDer 12, 1986, DeceNber 10, 1986, and February 11, 1987 regular tseetings. YII. RECOMMENDATION: Staff reco~ertds that the Planning CosNttsslon conduct a public hearing to review the proposed atsendNent, receive public input, and consider the follotAng options: 1. 1t tM Cassslsslon cannot wpport the facts for findings, a Resolution of Denial should be prepared for your adoption on the next Consent Calendar Agenda. 2. Should the Caas.lsston decfde to consider the proposed • aaend.ent and concurs with file recaaasettdatlons of staff, then the applicant should be directed to prepare a rcvistd list of land uses for the Business Park Overlay Zones. Upon retelpt of the rcrlsed astatdsrttt, staff would prepare a Resolution of Y'Yr ,.,1 Iw- el. ri.a r s.ii i.-ii. '-"icw w, u.e i~ew avallaDle agenda-~as a consent calendar hest. Res tfully s ltte , ~, Brad Bul er City Planner BB:NF:te Attachtsents: Applicant's February 10, 1987 Letter Exhlbtt "A' - Latest Proposed Text fras Lewis Noises for Business Park Overlay Zone EaMD1t "B' - Proposed Designated Areas for Overlay Zone Exhlbtt 'C" - Office, Cawsrclal aM Nixed Use Land Uses Initial Study, Part II n ~J St TERRA VISTA DELIVERY BY MESSENGER February 10, 1987 Planning Division Attention: Ms. Nancy Fong City of Rancho Cucaaonga 9320-C Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 CI'IO fECE14ED . GNU„~ rJi; cb. ~ rq i'L...'.C i ~~~. .,, FEB =.. i~r' w 718191b1U112111213141516 RE: TERAA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 86-02 - TERRA VISTA BUSINESS PARK Dear Nancy: • Thank you for your review of our proposed Business'Park Overlay Zone as set forth in the staff report of December 10, 1986. Ne wish to respond to the Analysis section (Section III) of the report as follows, using your subject headings and paragraph numbers: A. EstablisMnent of a Business Park Overlav Zone This Planned Community Amendment is the zone change that we seek for purposes of this zone. It should not, however, be construed to obliterate the underlying zone--that zone is to remain, Our intent, with respect to the CUP procedure, is to afford the City additional revtew and conditioning authority over proposed business park projects, so that each such project that is put before the City is subject to the requirements of that procedure. Exhibit C to your December 10 staff report correctly shows the areas which our proposal as currently written would make subject to the overlay. However, it is not our intention to apply the overlay indiscriminately to such a large area, and we hereby request that the Business Park Overlay Zone De restricted to the areas shown on the attached Development Plan. This restriction can be incorporated in the community plan by language fn the text, exhibit, or both. B. Uses Permitted in Business Park Overlav Yone 1. NO comment. "%"~ Mo..^ie.r A,e °0 0o. 5'C '. oianp ;43~~95 ~; t.f r 9P.5 ~OW •~ CBV2'O Pe: CV L¢W~$ Hnrn¢5 / 9G p- Planning Division February 10, 1987 ~ ~ ~ " '; .. Page 2 !' , ~, . ~ si4i5i6 2. It is not the intent of this proposal to allow, in the paragraph which begins "Studios, stores, and industrial uses; rather, we see the uses listed here as entirely appropriate within the context of the residential and business environments that will characterize Terra Vista. In an effort to refine the characteristics of the uses which will be permitted, we have again modified the language of this paragraph. Mere, too, the language has again been modified in an effort to ensure that permitted uses will be appropriate to Terra Vista. Additionally, we have deleted hardware stores and we have prohibited autanobi le upholstery. Me believe the remaining uses, with the additional regulations afforded 6y the text changes, are entirely suitable for inclusion within Terra Vista. 4. Ib comment. We also believe, with respect to the Environmental Assessment section (Section IY) of the report, that wfth Lhe incorpbratton of these changes this proposal now merits a negative declaration. Thank you very much for your continued interest and cooperation. • Cordially, X, ahn R. M~ e1~~ Yrce Presfdent/Pro,lect Development JRM:kr:514z U i97 • r1 ~J h m N Q W _N W a <_ .L WS ~ s a •~ ~' r u pF r= O ~~ =U Yj 1- < U W~ LCy ~~ N W < ~ < C O W I'^ M U 2 z LL J d U o LL «_ O N ' W N G 2 N W J C .: '. W :::. ~ '/ W Q` U2,. 6'z~ >Oa F U a ci b W u ~ '~. ~~ ~~ V 1 ~:N ~M: e~ V ' 1 ~ ~ ~ h ~~ v a /9P m n 0 w ut o ~ m v as . 7 ° ~ L ~ N E ,. c v ~a o a oq v .. r L..°. io ; L . Y aE •• o,a b $ v ° E N ~« u a ~ m Y J N- c> m v E ~ c n. N c c Nay-„ ie w~ E N j _- d .N L U m~ LJ c N„ ppad o ua c ti a ,N C C d Y N~ ~; N U '? A G ~ O j 9 v _ Yq > L~ V CN oN COI OIv q Y r Y V Gu ~y O a ~aN 6 mC ~ C OI N «d C Yo ~ U~ LNYa Y'- t] w C Y ~y ~I C G ~V ° ~~ a u Y Y U a ° U N V. uT .Y.r LdN C ~C NaLq YV Nu Y C > .~ T U L a N a q Y N N G U L ~ C ~ r ~. ~' N C m i p ~;n N 3 u` o c a y ~ ~ A N E C .v u« ° a N y N E o'-°~$ °qc ~•d °- cN ::ouYVY y°m «~ c c -° «a ~. a•-r Cep Ug J.Y. « NJ ~ m~ ~C: ui ~J N U Y Y O NY7C d L N Y Y N._ E O~0001'WWV1~ N "mu a`in v~i00~ E~ _~ c c b Y ~M N C~ O V O m W C ~ O . Z o~~swd~gE~g'; n~ q~ 3 N = km~ `=~ m~~ >~ aNy a \0w m E~°~ D r N d ~' H.L. Qi ~ Y d N r !17 n «~ u>.,r° ~aE uYi 3c `a ~ ry ~ ANY °c ~ N o ~ > O o ~ T ~ Y~ F N« C V Y N~ Lq~ A N '~ E Y S ~ ~~ 0 Y [TNmu NNW Y01m 6V YN d ~UN a L a N N N N y`~° y ~~" y~ L= C h ~ N ~ .. ~ ~ O O~ A O •~. C O S m Y Y ... ~O G J~ ~x'o'uEi~d«~r°v :: NU c r~« O uq C L m r~ a r .+ u L ~ J N T C L~ Y O a ~ ° N C y Y« C -' rn a `0 ° N c E m'; N~ Y a o O w E ~ Y ~_ ~ c« c Y~~ y c ,o` ~ "m 5 y,Y. GY ~m~i ocm i a5E N ~,°-~~ ~ ~ ~L C.u 3 c ~ do i ov=c N° ~r c a a, c Na u3v Nua~v • 1-.°. mo]o(D Ea ~$~a~q FL-~r°_O ~ ~wg < tai P z i99 ~ ~ ~~ ~ N N[ Y N u 10 N = y N N 9 N l O [ C a N Q g Y U a Y L O C E Y Y a NN N L q.. LL N L C N L 7 _ N N U Y U~1 a N O 7N rYD yy YY •~S Y G N y N Y C 10 C C O.~ N N Y ~ Y Y L N OO O C 7 N 0 O a L Y C N > v d~ L N G '~ ~ 6 . Y N a N N~ N Y Y O J S N >. a y C ~ O N N N L ' m _ d V y L > O~ d 9 7 ~ p 3 U C N N> ~ ~ Y""N L NYS C d ~ O d a p N N y OI Y L D 0 9Y CN y, « N O] O. V 6 3 N L 9 Y a Y (1 `Q Y N O N q l N U L OI y 0 C A ap 'N a p> -~ L ' ' Y Y y • L. C N L U . N m N ~ ~ N U O ~ O m ~ O u y y u Y N Y ] 01 « ~ ~ Y O C U Y 7 am Y 0. d E Y u • ~ j. Y m t ~ 9 t ; - O w Y L u E >. >. N •] LLY = > C'pp Yaa- N W N.~ >• " 'er N ~ ON ~ a m= ~ N N Y C O s • r T G Y Y N9LSu1 8~ C~'1L>'~Y q j uOiF J'~O E ~A> M ~ L O.. -y O Ga0 y1 8Y Y V N EE L'~'~ ~ 'N O ~`~` 010 Y.~ Y 70a Uma LY E U N L~« l 6 u ~ ~~ w b b U < u O U P n10. ~ m ,~ • ~ L N Y L O N ~' Y O aE~ o ~ ~~ N 9 N Qi N >. • 9 Y C Y C L- aN C GOd 10 aY C U iA ~ ^. A r N 99 ~~ J N ~w O L N N N GI S - Y ~ N Q~C C N d« 11 p C N Y a V 0 Y N Y y VCNL m aOVY •~YYN E 7 ~ L u Y a9iE$ L N n~oLC uvl ."1 C C T L L .. Y '~ y ~ Y N g~ O1 a ~d a~S u;N~ ~aL ~ •vc N» ~m.m_ N ~ u T Y L 7 r u « N N U JU N ~~ C C OqN C ~ _ry 9 ~~ Y«ONN . .Y. N Y a L ' 7 N m ~ N a C>- uu N C C Eo.Y.o3~ a l ~ C E Y N Y q ` Y ;;; ~.. ~e Y._ ._u h>Lr 1 L;N _ CC N Y ~'~,~Vyt 0 U G LO Y E A q a N E YE NJ L q V N .Y1 ~ 10 . p Lp ~ .di U L ~E N ~ n L 6 w G- E 6 N A e~~ e p N 1 l L y Y y 01 9 7« L O °~ 3u i l 01W N d 01C L Y g77 ua'r« [ ~ O 'NO tYt// •d L~- G C r 9 ~ C y ~ u y E ~ dN>'~ C L U L y R LmC p O s.. G~ C .7 .Yy N ~' N 7 N J U w u" d O C ~ N L C_ ~- ~p Y ~ Y N N o~ 7 ~ Y L O qq `Y - Y p" L ~ 6 ~ „~ ~ 9 j R 7 COCd~ L Y« U Y ~3N 1~UU ~ pp Y J'f 6.SU< GG ry~ SLL_ C Y C Y V C ~YLN N•rNR W K L 6~O >~ 0~0 O V • :~ ~x - >! =OQ riX ~~ ~f'~_Jf Itl_ r. ~'I~~i~ 3I = ' z a 3 ~ ~~ ~ ; r f ~~ ~ ~ o i _ ~) li ~ j . ~I ~ 3 3 ~ ~\ '" ~ S 6 ~ i jj( 1 G ~ ' 1. ~ W ~1 =~ ~ G i J 1\C` I r II ~ } I, ~ ~ s _ a~ \\ ii ,~ z i i : ~ i r' ~ I = ~ $ ~ +~ do/ ~_ 'a~ N ~N 1 'o P ~ ¢_ ca ~ ~J ~ N ~~ 03o3 m o T N J b n~ C w 7 ~~ !y(~~ .~ m 7 N 9 O. w~' =w ~ u ~g m~ r~n~ ed w ;ma~~a a~ 3 3 ~ p A ~~ , ~ 7 ~ C~ a n A wg l N m ~_ 6~ ? C A A 7 w N ^ Q n u ~ Q n a Q e ma m^3i my n3-d g oe` i ao N ,., n mN ~ ~ a"' a 7 ?~ i uA~ ~ m ~ o. o gQ ~, wa' wn '~'gn 7 u~ c ~ _ S _ O Cp 7C C< 7 A N n 7 m 7C ,y < n 7N7 m~ n n~ 7x ^ Q; CR i n~ ~p6 bm u.^, O ~G N w w b N ~ ~ 'b b a n Gm o w a ~ A 'm ° 7 w v < T w^ ~; N w ~ n Y C 7 w ~ M_ ; N m n 7 A m 7'P SM „ ~ 7 w „` ~ A ~ A 7 V1TA~ S w,< n'~ ~ c ~ YI = ~7~ 7 7 O an umin g N ~ ~n ^< ~ ^~~ ~ w '~ p c m] .'( w ~ S OF ~ n G 7 O 7 m s~ ~ Y1 b • m ~ s$ 3 u 7 A n ~ b m y 3~ C i N m M ~ G ~ O ~. ~. ~ 2 A C ^ '~ n~ n n n" A R ~ .N u ~ 1C ~ ~ a ~ ~ - ~ ~ ". 0 9 ~° ~ a~ ~ s r ~ +_ sy 3~ K y x ~' _~ ~ a ~ x _ ~~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~~ ~ 3 N m ~+ ~ a ~.'~: wC w w ~ b ~ ~ N +N ' ~ !~ _3a ~s M ~ ~ °a a~ ~ > Oo r ~ ~;_ ~ ~ Mq~ ~ 3 ~ ~ s N ~. ,aR~ ~~ m M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ y ^t GGG m = Ni i 3 ~ ^ ~ N N S C ~~ 4` ~ N 7 A ~ 'C 3~ ~ ~ ~~ ao ~ ~3 0 _> ~ n a c a c a a ,y = A ~ i m j ~ K~ ~ c ? c 3 u 9 G S ~~ ~ ~ d = s o ~; ~ m m ~ c in 33 n q 'n w ~~ _ ~ ~ N - y 6= ~ n J uCi d C ~ ~ u R A N ~ S C ' IC m e n n ~ ~ N d m O ~ 7 ; W A a n ro p ~ u w ^ N m ~ N N ~ 6 G V ~n M ~ 2 A d m ~ '~ ~ ' ~~ G c ~ w N O ~ _ w .F ~ j < n N N ~ N .] ~ N~ J j 6 n n ~ N O 6 OI J y n ~ _ ~ ~~ ~~gg 3 S,Q ~ a ~ 0 ~ m m ~ ~ ~ g M 2 g ' ° 9 m H G m n to ~ _ 1~ d R d A ~ ~ b a 1 a < 7 a ~ ~ C ~ ~ pj O ~ N e A M i° ; ~ ~ n N ~ ~ i " ~ 3 g n L~ ~ . ~ S ?S;? S> do A !P s>! a ~~ ox 63A - p ~a ~~ C ~ N Ay ~ i C ij~ N ~ Z i S ~ ~, 0. r ~ n ~ n = ~ N G .~ :~ d 1y ~ ~ ~g~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ S F )r y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 j Onl V`' N ~ ~ ~ N ~ a N m a ~ H ~~~ g n 3 R o' n N A ~~ ~ ~ X03 RESOLUTION M0. 87-31 • A RESOLUTION OF THE RANGp CUCAMONGII PlA1RIIN6 COIMISSION RECOIMENDING GENIAL OF TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMJNITY AMEIaD1Et1T 86-02, TO MODIFY THE COIMMITY PLAMIIED TEXT BY E5TA8LISHINB A BUSINESS PAID( OVERLAY ZONE FOR AREAS DESIGNATED AS OFFICE PARK DISTRICT, CONIIERCIAL DISTRICT AND MI%ED USE DISTRICT NITNIN THE PLANNED COMlINITY 80UNDARY. A. RECITALS (11 MNEREAS, wstarn Propert/es Ms f11 ad an appl tcatian for the approval of a Terca Vista Planned Community AaMndaant 86-0¢, describes above 1n the title of this Rasolutlan. (il) NIEREAS, an Octabar 8, 1986, tM Planning Ces~lsstan at tM Ctty of Rancho Cuuea~nga conducted a duly noticepdp publtc boring an Lhe cantfnwd~ TAM ~ltrantUen~M :orwber t6, 1gB6cwwOdtted pKrtnftrst nWS1on to Llal proPOeed aslendrent for Plamtng Coaatalon rester. At tM cant/nwd Moraaber 11, 1986 aNttng, the -lamitnn9g Carlsstan continued tM haartng at tM reVuest of staff, m ally sufftefent tlar to nrter the proposed revls/on to the astMMdbnt. Thereafter, on Decerber 10, 1966 and February il, 1967, tM Planning Casslsstae a9+in held public hearings an tM proposed aaandaent rlNre an eKh such daG, • tt ws eontlnwd at tM ragwst of the applicant. On February 10, 1987, the applicant wbeltttad ties sacand rwtaton to the proposed ausndoant for PLnnln9 Caaalisston nrler. (111) NHEREAS, at tM eantlnwA ~tf.. ..f ~_._...... .~ •rr w,~ cu, li0/, LI1e rianntng Ca~tsston Mld a public hearing to consider the suDlect eetpr of the proposed asrndaent aiM dtractad staff to prepare a resolution reco~eandln9 dental for tM1r nrler at tM March Z5, 1987 regular Planning Coaaaisslon eaNttng under a Consent GlaMar Itw. (iv) NNEAEAS, all legal pnreQuislUs to the adoption of this Resolution of here aaurred. B. RESOLUTION NON, THEREFORE, 1t 1s found, detenst Md and resolved by tM Planning Coewisston of the Ctty of Macho Cueaaonga as follows: 1. Th1s Caaedsslon Mreby spactflully finds that all the facts set forth 1n tM Rscltals, Pert A, of this Resolution are Lrw and correct. aov PuwalwG caMlrala• eso~urtoM wo. 7YPC 86-02 - wESTEh.. /ROPERTIES MareA 25, 1987 Page 2 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Caa~isslon during the above referenced OctoMr 8, 1986, Novesber 12, 1986, Decesder 10, 1986, February 11, 1987 and Febrwry 25, 1987 public hearings, including written staff reports, this CO~isslan heroby specifically finds as follows: a. The proposed asrndeent, by adding custew wanufaeturing industrial type of land uses, substantLlly alters the pnsent planned land use of dr Terra Yista Planned Co~untty aM LAe General Plan. D. The proposed asundsrnt Mould teflfliet with the abiKtives and policies of tM General Plan, Industrial Specific Plan and du Terra Ytsq Caarntq Plan. c. TM proposed a~endnant, fn adding euste~ awtnufaeturln9 industrial uses within the residsnt1a11Y Planned coss4nlty, could haw a significant lapaet on the environarnt by espming people to an tircrease 1n traffic hazard sins puck traffic would tncreaa wbstant/ally; and, espose people to an increase In htaltA, safety and nuisance factor such as noise and odor. 3. Based upon tM wbstantlal evidence presented to this Caassisston • during tlu above rNereneed public hHrings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth 1n Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Les~lssien hereby finds and concluMs as follows: :. Tire aaanlaalni 7s In conflict with the land use policy of the General Plan. b, The anendont does not pra~ote 4ht goals of the land use elenent. e, The aaundaent would be ~aterlally 1nturious or detrlnental to ayacent properties. 4. Pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of die Cailfornla 6overnawnt Code, the Planning CorNsslon of the C1b of Rancho Cucasanga hereby recoanends denial of Terra Y1sq Planned Co~unlty AsenAwnt 86-02. 5. The deputy secretary to this Cosrisslon shall certify to tM adoption of tM Resolution. • dor PLANMIN6 COMA SSION ^rSOWTION N0. TYPC 86-02 -NESTER ROPE0.T[ES March 25, 1987 Page 3 • • APPROVED AMD ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1987. PLANM[~ q~E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAlgN6l1 ATTESi• ~oraa euT~q~~ n 1 I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the planning Cea~lssion of tIM C1ty of Rancho Cucaagnga, dD hereby eert/fy tMt tM foregoing Resolution aala duly and C~loflRaneho~~ passed, and adopted by t1M planning Ce~lssfon of the on tM 25th uca~onga, at a regular eretinngg o/ LIM Plane/ng CoaNsston Mld day Of IYrch, 1987, by tM follaaing rote-to-~At: AYES: COIMISSIOIERS: CHITiEA, MCNIEL, ENERECK, BARKER, TOLSTOY NOES: COINISSIONE115: NONE ~ ' ABSENT: CONIIISSIONERS: NONE aoc • DRAFT PLANN[NG COMMISSION MINUTES - FEBRUARY 25 1981 - FOR DISCUSSION PU NLY Q. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA vl ttA of euurn rnrruurrv a„rurv,ru. „~ "., - .narcn a ro - r request to amens the Terra Vista Planned ommunlty by estab fishing a Business Park Overlay Zone for areas designated as Office Park, Commercial and Mixed Use, within the Planned Community boundary - APN 1077-421-06, 1077-091-17. (Continued from January 14, 1987) Nancy Fong, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Brad Butler, City Planner, advised that this item was continued from a previous meeting, therefore, was being advanced in the agenda. He additionally stated that the Plannf ng Commission's action on this amendment would be a recommendation to the City Council. Y ice-Chairman McNi el opened the public hearing. John Melcher, representing the applicant, commented on the staff report. He advised that the applicant wanted to develop the business park type of use with the full range of uses listed in each of the zones indicated as potential locations for this use. He, therefore, disagreed Lhat the overlay zone is redundant and asked that it 6e allowed to aDD1Y to all the zones. He disagreed with staff's conclusion that retail studio land uses do not give sufficient definition of this section and is therefore of no value. He • pointed out that the staff report also states that aDDliance rcpatr, plumbing shops and supplies, television and ra dto repair and upholstery shops are incompatible uses in an office park and agreed that this statement as written is true; however, the applicant stated these uses are entirely appropriate within a business park environment. He commented on staff's suggestion that sl,. .n _. "" '~-''~ LG.ci Lly auiea anJ inataiiacion, palm ono Home decorating stores could Involve large showrooms and warehousing and advised that these would be retail uses and he expected the tenants to be small merchants whose primary trade is developed from the residential sections of the community. He believed that the receiving of household goods, the retail sale of such goods and the delivery and installation of such goods in customer's homes and place of business is a legitimate and appropriate activity within Terra V15 to and not in any way industrial in character. He disagreed that dance studio would be inappropriate in this environment and stated they are small businesses which require relatively large floor areas and low rents and, therefore, have a need of the business park environment. He felt that dance studios may be priced out of commercial recreational facilities and stated it 1s unlikely that any dance stud to could adversely affect other businesses uses or activities. He indicated that noise factors could 6e mttiga ted through construction. He further disagreed that the poLPr.tial fpr adverse enVlrefllmental Imps^. t5 a%f5L5 dnd suggestEd thdt it would be appropriate to prepare a Negative Declaration on the basis of the proposal as submitted. Mr. Melcher additionally gave a slide presentation. Terry Sario, 10025 Yew Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that residential uses should be above Foat hill and any type of commercial uses be~uw -Foothil 1. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. X07 Commissioner Chitiea stated that she did not think that expanding this area is • going to be beneficial to the City or the community as a whole and didn't see enough rural areas that are appropriate to allow a change. She found nothing in the applicant's proposal to support that the request was essential to Terra Vista and stated that the uses proposed belong in an industrial area. She stated that for the City to take everything on a case-by-case basis is not the appropriate way to control land uses and was unconfortaDle with the request for all uses in all zones. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that the planning that went into the Planned Communities process was quite intense and the uses that were allowed to go in the Planned Communities were looked at very closely. He was concerned with plating a Business Park Overlay in a Planned Community. He stated that it reduces the quality of a land use pattern that was established. He pointed out that when a developer has a building to rent he never knows what tenants will go into what building; therefore, one never knows how io design the building to actomplTSh sound proofing a building to accommodate a light manufacturing or dance studio type of use. He further stated that businesses come and go and uses change aM it would be difficult to anttclpate all kinds of uses in all kinds of design requirements. He stated that the Planned Losnunity Text currently has provisions for many of the uses the appltunt is asking for in the Business Overlay request. He did not think that the additional ones the applicant wished to add would enhance the Terra Vista project coawercial areas or office park areas. He further stated that the City has many acres of husiness park available to developers, and did not support the request because • it is in conflict with the General Plan. Vice-Chairman McHiel stated that he concurred. He pointed out that the applicant stated that eventually the Business Park Overlay would become all office, which is what currently exists to the Plan. He Could not support the rc yue+t. Motion: Moved by Emerick, seconded by Chitiea, unanimously carded, to direct staff to prepare a Resolution of Denial to be placed on the March 25, 1987 Planning Commission agenda. • aoa 19e9?'~L • RESOLUTION N0. 8 ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCi10 CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF TERRA VISTA PLANNED CgMINITY ANENOMENT 86-02, TO MODIFY THE COMMMUNITY PLANNED TEXT BY ESTABLISHING A BUSINESS PARK OVERLAY ZONE FOR AREAS DESIGNATED AS OFFICE PARK DlSiRICT, COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND MIXED USE DISTRICT NITHIN THE PLANNED COMMUNITY BOUNDARY. A. RECITALS (1) NHEREAS, Nestern Properties has filed an application for the approval of a Terra V1sta Planned Coassunity Mendsent 86-02, described above in the title of this Resolution. (11) NHEREAS, at the continued aw!etlny of February 25, 1987, the Planning Ca~ission held a public heariny to consider Lhe proposed aeendsent and directed staff t0 prepare a resolution recde~ending finial for their review at the March 25, 1987 regular Planning Coaaatssion aeeting under a Consent Calendar Its. (111) NHEREAS, on March 25, 1987, the Planning Casdsston approved the Resolution recaaaaending dental to Lhe C1ty Council. . (1v) NHEREAS, on April 15, 19W, the CTty Council held a duly adverttzed puD11c hearing to consider the Droposad anandwnt. (vl NHEREAS. ali legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it 1s found, detereined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cutawnga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all the facts set forth 1n the ReciUis, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence Dresented t0 trtts Council during the above referenced public hearing, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a, The aisendAent is to conflict with the land use Dolicy of the General Plan. b, The aa~endeent does not prawte the goals of ehe 1 and use eleawrnt. c. The anendaxnt would be auterially 1niurious or detriabntal to aq(acent praperttes. ao9 CITY LOUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. TERRA VISTA PIJINNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 86-02 Apr11 15, 1987 Paye 2 r1 LJ 3. Pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Goverment Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaiwnga herooy denies Terra Vista Planned Coaawtnity NaendaM!nt 86-02. 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of the Resolution. r1 -..J • ~~O l I • CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.~IONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 15, 1987 TD: Mayor and Me~bers of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cynthia 5. Kinser, Assistant Planner ~~c~.trq ~~ ~~ ~,,~~,- F ~ 2 ... > t97i SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENOIENT 85-030 rcques aaxn an se sen o nera Plan iron Low-Medlar Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units/acre) to Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelliny units/acre) for 66 acres of land located at the southwest corner of Nilson (if extended) and Milliken (if extended) - APN: 201-191-i1, 17. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT - reques p ray "FC"" (Flood C~trol) and "LM"p(Low-MediwecDmsity Residential - 4-8 dwelllny units/acre) to "L" ILow DenilLy Residential - 2-4 dwelling units/acre) for 66 acres of land located at the southwest corner of Nilson (tf extended) and Milliken (if extended) - APN: 201-191-11, 17. I. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Coswisslon recaewends the City ounc approve the proposed General Plan Anendaient and Develaonent uistn ct Iwendeent, tf the City Council concurs, adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval va old be appropriate. II. BACKGROUND: Thts General Plan and Developxient District Aoendnent was n ated Dy the CSty Council to change 66 acres of land on the soutnwest corner of the extensions of Mil son and Milliken ,)ust east of Chaffey Colleye iron Low-Medtua Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units/acre) to Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelliny units/acre). The Planning Commission initially heard the requested anendaents on SeptenDer 24, 1986. The Commission had expressed concerns with grading, circulation, density and land use transitions associated with a Low Density development on the site Tne amendments were continued at the request of the property amer to allow the developer, the Deer Creek Company, to prepare a subdivision nap to show how the property could De developed under the Low Density standards. This plan was recently submitted to the City and reviewed concurrently witA the land use applications. Tentative Tract 13542 was approved by the Planning Commission en March 25, 1987 . A copy of the staff report is attached for your reference. ~ ~~ C[TY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA de-03D - CITY OF RANCHO LUCAMONGA DDA 86-OS - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA April 15, 1987 Page 2 III. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: On March 25, 1987, the Planning aaw ss on a pu c aring to consider the General Plan and Oevelopiaent District Aab~aent and review of the subdivision abp. The Gaw.tssion felt Lhe subdivision awp did address their concerns of grading, circulation, density and land use transitions. The Planning Coallssion found that the General Plan and Developsent District Anend~aents would praaate the land use gals and policies of the General Plan, would not bQ awterfally deLriaKntal to aylacent properties, and would not ause significant adverse envlrcnakntai fagacts. Therefore, the Anendeent was approved by the Planning Coasstssion. Detailed staff reports to the Planning Co~isston arc attached for your review. Res tfully su fitted, ~~ Bra Bu er City Planner BB:CK:te AttachaKnis: Planning Cosfission Staff Report of September 24, 1986 Planning Caa~isston Staff Report of January 14, 1987 "IS.ri.:y Ci,.wiiSi mi 3i.aii nepVrr ui FeorwrY 26, 19tl7 Planning Ca~ission Staff Report of March 25, 1987 Planning Ca~alssion Resolution No. 87-35 Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-36 Resolutions of Approval • • ~/ 2 GRAFT PLAIRI[16 cDilUSSIDM NiRUTES - MARCIi 25, 1987 - FOR DISCUSSIDR PIAIPOSES . OILY F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-03D - CITY OF reques amen an se omen o enera an rom ow dlum Density Residential (h8 dwelling units/acre) to Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units/acre) and/or Yery Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units/acre) for 68 acres of land located at the southwest Corner of Nilson (if extended) and Milliken (if extended) - APN: 201-191-11, 17. (Continued from February 25, 1987) ENYIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEYELOPMENi DISTRICT AMENDMENT 86.05 - CITY o oC~n rol) and~•LN° (LOr-Me41u• e0eni~ityn Residential v 4 8 dwelling units/acro)" t~ "L" (Low Density Residential - 2-4 dwelliny units/acre) and/or YL (Very Low Density Residential - less than 2 dwelling units/acre) for 68 acres of land located at the southwest corner of Nilson (if extended) and Milliken (1f extended) - APN: 201-191-11, 17. Cynthia Kinser, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Chatramn Barker opened tiro public hearing. Michael Valrin, 8480 Utica, Rancho Cucamonyd, advised that he was representing the applicant for Tentative Tract 13542, which was proposed to De developed on this site and was being heard on this evening's ayenda. Mr. Va/r1n gave an • overview of the product type anC site plan for Tentative tract 13542 and supported staff's recoamrondation to ascend this site to Low Density Residential. There were no further caaaeents, therefore the public nearing was closed. caawissioner kminck stated that he felt cdmforpble with the pra3ect designed by the Deer Creek Company and stated that the concerns of the Cdsaaission had been addressed. Me supported the Low Density designation. Coaaissioners Tolstoy and NcNiel supported the Low Density designation and stated they were happy with the proposed Oeer Creek pro,)ect. Coswtsstoner CM ilea supported the Very Low designation. She advised that all tracts north of Banyan were to be minimal half-acre equestrian lots; therefore, she felt more comfortable with Cne Yery Low deslynatlon. Motion: Moved by Faerlck, seconded by MtNiel, to recomarond to the City Council the issuance of a Negative Declaration and adoption of the Resolution approving the Low Density Residential deslgnatlon (2-4 dwelling units/acre) for Environmental Assessment and General Dian Amendeent 86-030. Motion carried by the following vote: ~/3 AYES: CDilIISSIONERS EMERiCK, MCNIEL, BARKER, TDLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: GNITIEA • ABSENT: COIMtSSIONERS: NONE -carried Motion: Moved Dy E~erlck, seconded by McNiel, to recaaaw!nd to the City Council the issuance of a Negative Declaration and adoption of the Resolution approving the "L" Ilow Density - 2-4 dwelling units/acre) desiynation for EnvironNental Assessoent and DevelopNent District Anendaent 86-05. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS ENERICK, MGNIEL, BARKER, TBLSTOY NOES: COlMISSIONERS: CNITIEA ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NOME -carried U ziY r~ ~~ • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~ ~~c.~.~i~k. ., <' ~~ ~' ~'' F ~ Z .. > GATE: March 25, 1987 T0: Chairsxln and Meebers of the Planning Cos~lssion FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cynthia S. Kinser, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND fiENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-03D - rcques asw!n an se assn o e ra Plan frogs Lor-Medics Density Residential (M8 dwelling units/acrcl Lo Law Oenslty Residential (2-4 dwelling units/acre) and/or Yery Law Density Residential (less tMn 2 dwelling units/acre) for 68 aces of land located at the southwest corner of Nilson (it extended) and Milliken (if extended) - APM: 201-191- 11, 11. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Alp DEVELOPMENT D15TRICT rogues - . .. Control) and 'LM'~ MedlircDenslty Re ldential (~ 48 dwelling units/acro) to 'L' (Low Density Residential - 2-4 dwelling units/acn) and/or "YL' (Very Low Density Residential - less than 2 dwelling units/acre) for fib ages of iand iocated as the southwest turner of Nilson (1f extended) and Milliken (if extended) - APN: 201-191- 11, 17. 197' BACKGROUND: At its coating of February 25, 1987, the Planning aassi"~Tan continued tAis General P1 an and Developewtnt 0lstrict Nsendsent. Tha purpose of continuing this aaundsxnt was t0 have concurrent rcvtew o} a related Circulation MenAaant and proposed subdivision swp. The Circulation Eleslent it being revised to change the allgnslent of Nilsen and Banyan, which border the site on the north and south. The peer Creek Caepany has sub~sitted a suDdlvlston eap (TT 1352) that atteepts W address the Caesisston's concerns of grading, circulation, density, and land use transition issues. These related fist are being reviewed tonight. ~,/r ITEM F PLANNING LOMMISSIG TAFF REPORT I GPA 86-03D - CITY OF RANCHO CUCIUIONGA DDA 86-05 - CITY OF RP.NCHO CUCAMONGA March 25, 1987 ~ Page 2 • I(. ODTIONS: The Commission's primary concerns for this Site have been grading, circulation, density and land use transition. There are two options before the Commission (please consult previous staff reports for more detail): A. That the existing Low-Medium designation (4-8 dwelling units/acre) be changed to Low Density Residential (2-4 dweiling units/acre). This is the property owner's preference. B. That the sub,lect site be changed to Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units/acre) per the Commission's previous request. Alternative A: This designation would provide an adequate transition of densities with the 6,000 square foot lots south of Banyan. However, the north portion of the site abutts Deer Lreek (1 acre lots) where the • transition will be more abrupt. On Deceaber 3, 1986, the Deer Creek Company submitted a Tentative Tract Map (TT 13542) to staff. The Commission may refer to the staff report on TT 13542, that Witt be discussed later this evening, to see how this site may be developed at a Low Density standard. If the Planning Lommfssion ue Leruii uea Ci,aL Luw GmuiLy neaiumiLiai is Ciro ayyruyria Ce General Plan and Development District designation, the Tentative Tract Map will continue through the Orocess. Alternative B: The Commission has requested the alternative of Yery Low Residential on the subJett site. The Very Low designation would work more effectively with equestrian trails and would require less grading on the s1te. This designation would provide an appropriate transition of density adjacent to the Deer Creek proSect. However, the transition to the area south of Banyan designated as Low-Medium would represent a two-step change (Very Low to Low-Medium), and would be less appropriate. III. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The Initial Study has been completed for bat t e ow an cry ow designations by staff and no significant adverse environmental impacts were identified to De associated with either alternative. L F-~ ~/6 PLANNING COMIIISStnu STAFF 0.EPORT GPA 86-030 - CITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA ODA 86-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA March 25, 1987 Page 3 • IV. FACTS FOIL FINDINGS: SAould the Canatssion, upon exaeMnation of the su ec nera an Mendaent and Development District Aaxndaknt, decide that the change would proaate the land use goals and policies of the General Plan, would not be materially detriakntal to the adJacant properties ar would not Cause significant adverse enrlron•antal lagaets, the following arc the findings that are necessuy upon arrival: A. TM Amendeants do not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan; and B. The Aundawmts do promote goals of the Land Use Elewent; and C. The Amanda~ants would not be arterially incurious or datrlawatal to the adJacanL properties; and D. TMt the suD,cact property is suitable for tM uses perwittsd 1n the proposed dlatrict 1n tenr of access, s1ze, and caegat1b111ty with existing land use 1n Afrrounding areas. • Y. CDRRESPONDENCE: This 1te~ Ms been advertised as a Wb11c hearing n + y sport newspaper. the property was posted, and not cos warf i senY~o alt property owners within 300 feet of the protect s1ta. vI. RECOMIIENDATIdI: Staff 1s rcquesttng direction as to the east appropr a s gMtton for th! property. Resolutions are attached for both Low and Yery Low Density Residential designations. if the Caawlssion selects one of these options, approval of the aDDroDriate Resolution of Approwi is necessary. ResD tfully ONLted, tar City lanmm BB: CK ae Attecharnts: Staff Report of Saptedar 24, 1987 Staff Report of January 14, 1987 Staff Report of Fabruery 25, 1987 Resoluttans of Approval >~3 ~~~ - - ..._ ........ ....... ................... ~~~ .,,nom STAFF REPORT ~~ , , ,?, ~' ~I: _~, ~i ~ z DATE: February 25, 1987 i9 T0: Chalreun and Mesibers of the Planning Casslsslon FROM: Brad Buller, C1ty Planner BY: Cynthia 5. Kinser, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AID GENERAL PLAN AMENDIENT 86-03D - {:l IT Ur RML1N GUGAelllwll - A req/eSL Lo Mane Ln! Lane se Bean era Plan from Low-Median Density Residential (4-8 dre111ng units/acre) to Low oenstty Residential (2-4 dwelling units/acre) and/or Yery Law Density RasldenLlal (less than 2 dwelling units/acn) for 68 acres of land located at tM southrast Corner of M11son (if extended) and M1111ken (tf extended) - APN: 201-191- 11, 17. U w,,..v„ my ,... ,pow-„n.,a. ,w,w,y nns,uem w, - .-o dwe111ng units/acn) to 'L' (Low penalty Residential - 2-4 dwe111ng units/acro) and/or 'YL' (Very Low Density Residential - less than 2 dwe111~p units/acre) for 68 acres o1 land located at cn..~~~~hy..t - ^f al;or, (If extended) and M1111ken (if extended) - APN: 4201-191- 11, 17. I. BACKGROUND: At the Planning Caolssion seetiny of January 14, T987~~Ca~lsston continued this General Plan Naendaent to February 25, 1987 for the Geer Creak Coapany to subM ! a suDdlr/ston sMp. The suDdirlsfon nap rauld address the Coawtsslon's concerns of grading, ctrculatlon, density and land use transition Issues an tM subject site. II. REVIEN: fie subdivision Mp (TT13542) was xupaltted to staff far review. The nep has proceeded through Design Review and 1s scheduled to ha heard Dy the Planning Cawission On Marth 25, 1987. The wp, however, 1s inconsistent with the Circulation Elenent of the General Plan. ~~ Staff Ts tunently in tM process of revising the Circulation Eleuent of Lhe General Ptan. One of the 1talas to b! revised 1s the altgmaent of N11son and M1111ken iron its currently curved ~~ ,~r9 Planning Cowwlsst r- Agenda GPA 86-03D - C[TY RANCHD CUCAMDNGA February 25, 1987 Page 2 • connection Lo a conventional 90° lntersectlon. Mikan is the northern boundary of the subject site. The clrculatlon element is scheduled to be heard by the planning CamH sston on March 25, 1987. As this rertslan will affect the submitted'amp and, thereforo, determination of this General Plan and Development District Amendment, staff requests these aeundeents be continued to March 25, 1987 when all related items yY be heard. III. RECDMMEMDATIDM: Stiff repasts that the Planning Co~isslan grant a can nuance of the fwneral Plan and Development DistrTCt AmendaeM to March 25, 1987. Res ally sub , r Buller City Plan r DB:CK:ve Attachments: Staff Report M September 24, 1987 Staff Report of denwry 14, 1987 • • ~5 ~/9 'S n u L~ CITY OF RANCHO CliCA.110NGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 14, 1987 ~ c~ .a~,~ -> ,~ ~: ~ _= ;. f FI ~ z _ Z iv-- TD: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cynthia S. Kinser, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENYiRONMENTAL ASSE55lENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-03D se omen ra -Plan from low-Me~dtust Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units/acre) to Law Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units/acre) and/or Very Low Density Residential (less tMn 2 dwelling units/acre) for 68 aern of lend located at the southwest corner of Wilson (if extended) and Milliken (if extended) - APN: ZDL-191- 11, 17. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ~- - - ~• ~ ~ K ~.~ ~w~eexw.n - n request t0 Control) and "L ~ (tw_MsdiwcDmsity R sldmtlal «4 8 dwelling units/acre) to 'L' (low Density Residential - 2-4 dwelling units/acre) and/or 'YL" (Yer, Low Dmslty Residential - less than 2 dwelling units/acro) for 68 acres of land located at the southwest corner of Ntism (ii a"Lenuedi and Allltxen (iT extended) - APN: 201-191- lI, 17. BACKGROUND: At the Planning Commission menttng of September 24, 1996 a request Lo change the General Plan land Use Nsp from Law- Medium Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units/acre) to low Density Residmttai (2-4 dwelling units/acre) to con~unctlon with a Development Districts Amendment was reviewed. This request was initiated by City Council. (Please ste the attached September 24, 1986 staff report for more details.) At the Commission meeting, concern was raised as to whetMr Low Density Residential was an appropriate transitional deslgnat/on from surroundlnyy land uses (Exhibit "A"). The property owner also asked that he be given the oDROrtunity to prepare conceptual pions for the sub,)ect site, and present the plan to the Planning Ceeialssion prior to decisions on the property being made. F-6 ~~o PLANNING COSMISSt Ow "4FF REDORT GPA 86-03D a ODA E -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA January 14, 1987 Page 2 • The Cameission continued this General Plan Mimdeent and Developeent District Anendeent to order for the landowner to provide a concepWal plan consistent with tM Low Density designation. Stall was requested to provide optlens at both the Low and Very Low deslgMttons. It. OPTIONS AVAILABLE: There are two options avallaDle to the acre ss on: (AI That the Low-Mediue designation to be changed to Low Density Residential (2-4 dwe111ng units/acre). This is consistent with the property owners preference. (B) Thal the sublecL site to be cMngad to Yery Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwel/1n9 units/acre) per the Co~lsslon's previous dlswsslons. Alternative A: TM property orner wWld prefer that tM sub~ece s exchanged Lw Density Msldmtial (2-4 dwelling units/acre). This deslgnaiten would perelt single fantly residences en lots of 8,000 square fat average nintnun. This destgnatten would provide en adegwte transition of densities to • soutA of Banyan's average of 6,000 sawn foot lots. However, tM north portion of tM stq abutts Deer Creek with its 1 acn tots and tM transiNan would be icon abrupt. On DecesDer 3, 1986, a representative of the property owner enlrlffrl a f~nfaH v~ frwrf Wan annllMf.1M M A1viM the nrnDertV into 203 single faeily lots at a density of 3.05 dwelling units per acre (Exhibit 'B"). Parcels proposed for LM site range in size froe 8,562 square feet to 18,940 square feet with an average 1oi size of 10,944 squaro feet 1n area. TM tots an generally located on cul-de-sac struts ceasing off of the aayor north-south circulation spine connecting Nilson Avenw and Banyan Street which creates a nuwber of sub-neighborhoods within tM project. Nh11e no unit product typo has Dean suDnitted as Dart of this application, discussions with the the applicant 1ndlcate that residences constructed on sLS walls with Wised wood floors an being censldered. As a result, the only grading that will De necessary w111 De far construction of the streets and assaiated tmproveaxnts. It is teportant to rota that no action 1s being requested on the tenietlve tract awp application at tRis tine. The Lract cap is provided pur~el! as an inforsaLional old to conceptually depict how the stu could-be Mveloped at the Lw OansiLy Residential F-7 a~/ PLANNING COMf1155I r' ^AFF REPORT GPA 86-03D 8 DDA ! - CITY DF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA January 14, 1987 Page 3 standards. tf the Planning Caarisston does deterslne that Low Density Residential is the appropriate General Plan and Development District Designation, the tentaLtve tract crop w111 continue through the caawittee process w tethntcal and design issues can be resolved prior to formal action by the Planning CaaaHSSion. Alternative 8: The Co~lsston has requested the algratlve of ery ow s ty Residential on the wb~ect site. Thts designation requires 22,500 sewn foot lots and 1s norarlly associated with an extensive troll syste~ and an anrlronawmt conducive to egwstrial use. If designated Yery Lor, approzirtely 130 dwellings would De peraHtted an the site by the General Plan, though if developed under the C1ty's Basle StanNrds as a eaventloal subdivision, a sere rcallsttc potential would be around 100 units. TM enact nueber would of course depend on tM specifics of design. The Yery Low desigatla would provide an appropriaU trans1t10n to density an tM north, ayaeent to tM Deer Creek protect. However the transition to tM area south of Banyan dasigated low-Madtw would represent a two-step channggee (Very Low. to Low-Medium), and would as a result M less appropriate. • IIi. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: TM Initial Study Ms been caepteted for ow an ery ow designations by staff an no stgnlficant adverse environronUl tapacts wen ldentlf/ad Lo be associated with either alternative. i'r. ~iwT~ Fiai fiM7lNli: 5110YId th! CoaNsfion, open exsmlaLlon Of L11! su ec nera an NrondeenL and Developawmt District Mendront, decide that the change would proamte the land use gals and policies of the 6taral Plan, would not be arterially detrimental to the adiacent properties or would not rouse slyniftcant adverse environmental impacts, the following arc the findings that are necessary upon approval: A. The Ibendmanb do not conflict with the land Use Po11c1es of the General Plan; and B. The Asmndawnts do proaaq goals of the Land Use Element; and C. The 1Mendarnts would not be materially lnaurtous ar Gtrimental to the ad,)acenL properties; and D. That the sub~act property 1s sultaDl• for Lhe uses perwltgd in the proposed district 1n terms of access, s1ze, and coapatib111ty with ealsting land use 1n surroundim) areas. a8 PIANNIN6 COMMISSit•" ^AFF REPORT 6PA %-03D 8 DDA . - CITY OF RANLND CUCAMDN6A January 14, 1987 Page 4 VI. CORRESPOIOENCE: Th1s ltde has been advertised as a public hearing n~iTa y lte ort newspaper. The property was posted, and notfes re sen~ all property owners within 300 feet of the protect site. YII. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is requesting direction as W the east appropr a gnatian for tM property. Resolutions an attached / ~r both and Very Low Density Residential desigrotions. tf the C 1s selects of one of these opttans, approval of tha a rop to Resolution of Approval is necessary. ub~lttad, ~~ :vc Attachaunts: Exhtbtt 'A' -Land Use Ezhtblt '8' - Canceptwl Traet Plan MinuUs of SepteeMr 24, 1986 P1anMng Caesslsslon • MNting Steff Report - Septeaber 24, 1986 Resolutions of Approval ig (,..1«so D~.~R G~~ V L ~~~~ ~ ~~ Z~~C~rx C~- ~e~t EL.T Srh. G'µaa~~.v ~A~ ~~ F•G ,Y.. C M N M ~„~ L u,~~..:o a ~ NOR 'L7pA 8b •CS CITY OF rrE~t:.r~p~ ~ •~~ ~' RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~s:_L- -~ y~~ PLANNING DIVISION 8xHI8IT:_. aL SCALE: F-~D y a z a p a =r.~ ~I~g ;~~ ;i~` }~7~ a~i~~ i~~~ ;~~ ~" :' i :~~ i~ xs ~e ~ ~1 1 ! ~ ~~ n ~ 111 }~~~~66y t ~A ~~~~f K"-Q ~ Y~}}~f4744~~fft+ ; ~.~ ~ a 1 ~~ilii~ll ~if~i~~ ~~j~'':~ i~~l ~ iz~~~~4~i ~~f~~~ 1~~ "~ i~{ e ~~ ~ ~-l( ~,;,; ~~i' ' ~ ~ ~ ji ! ~~~ 4~ ~ ;t f S F~IHierr "6' • ~• ~L,r- ~;nnrt.n ov-w l.{ I 1 • Rgwi !Ye Opak S r C ap rpll ae to "OP" (Office/Professional) for .75 acres of land looted on the south std! of Foothill Boulevard, 1125 felt nest of Rellayn Avenue (9113 FootMll Boulevard) - APN 208.241-09. Alan Marren, Assadate Planner, presented the staff report. Chairwan Staut apanad the public haring. Ryan Sellers, 13106 Md(iniey Avenw, Ch1no, urged approval of the request. Stew Luus, 9489 Aptleot, Rancho Cuwonga, supporbd the ragwst on bMalf Of the a~acfllt property eMllr. Thtre were no further coawants, LharHore tM DuD1/C hearing ra closed. Notion; Moved Dy Stout, seconded Dy Tolstoy, to recoawnd approwl of Envlron•antal Assassaunt and General Plan Asiana•e:k 86-03 C to tM Ctey Council. Motion cabled by tM folioring voq: ACES: COIIIISSIOMERS STOUT, TOLSTOT, BARKER, CNttIEA, MCN10. NOES: COIII155IOMERS: NOME ABSENT: COIIIISSIONERS: NOME -carried • Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded Dy Barker, t0 neawnd approval of Envlroiaaantai AsseswM and DevelopMaM Oistrlct AondMant 86-04 to the Ctty Council. Motion cabled by tM folloadng voN: AYES: COMMISSIONERS STOUT, BARKER, CHiTIEA, MCNI0., TOLSTOT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: HOME ABSENT: COMNi55I0MER5: MgME -carried • ~ ~ - s a{! {~° liaai Ie~l1I APaar ~ aiat7 1a' a reeve ~ Density Rs/dent/a1 (4-8 du/ac1 to low Density ResldaiKlal (2.4 du/ace for 68 aces of Und looted at tM souehwest corner of N11son (1f estended) and M1111ken (if esttnded) - APN 201-191- 11, 17. Planning COieaisslon Minutes -19- Septaebar 24, 1986 F ~a ,z~ on ro) and •La" flow Mediae Density a.s+dlntlal - 4-8 duiacli Lo "L' (lor DMStty aesldenttal - 2-4 du/ac) for 6B acres of land located at tM sauthwst corner of Wlson (if extended- and Mi111kM (if extended) - APN 201-191-I1, 17. Otto Knutil, SMior P1anMr, prlseMtd CM Staff report. Ghalrean $touL sULed that M thought LM County's Footh111 Cca~unlty Plan shoved M11 son exUnded across to Etlwnda. Paul aougeau, City Traffle Engineer, explained that tM Foothill Caeswnity Plan snore a street in tM gMenl ridnlty of Wilson rhich extends across to lath Strwt 1n Etiwnda. a! advised that Banyan is to extend to ELiwiMa and that staff weld be inlttating an astandnnt to tM C1ty's GlrculatiM plan in tM very MM tutuM. 11! further sUted that tM tssw needs to De axln closely studied as to rMtMr tree curve free Mii son to M1111kM mould be nUtned. ChairMn Stout ws conarnM that 1t looks 11ke tM C1ty Ms turned its back on tM arN north of Highland. a! suggested that 1f tM City ws going to cor'nct BanyM on t1N Clrulatton Plan, M11son should M studiM at tM saee flex,. Me then opened tM public Mu1ng. Tney Lawan Ttbbels 1OB22 M11son, aanMO Cucaonge, addressed Lbe Caa~ission an bMalf of hlexellt as a nsideM and also on behalf of tM landswen. He felt that 2-I units per acre ws a seeMngly appropriaq designation for this • s1te. H! suggested Mat tM Ca~lssion eontlmu its decision on this a~end.ent for 90 days to ailor Llae landorner to ex~et rlLh C1ty stiff, surrounding hpMOwers aiw Chaffey College. Ne tndluted Mat tM 1Mrower mould tMn bring a pro~ett proposal to C1ty. Ju Uetor~e, npnseircing cnartey coi iege, supportae tree Lor uensity desigMtion. Me potiKed out that on tIN east border of LM college eMn not only an atMlette fields, but also unMwloped land Mat has been deslgnate0 by tM college speetftully for f/dd study. FurMar, tMt tM colUge Md no ineenLi on of ever develop/rag Mat land. M! encouraged di seas siMS betwln tM landower and tM Cottege in ardor to daveidp a apn coMrML idea of hor LM land rill De usM. TMn more no furtMr eaa~Mts, tMnfon tM public Mar1n9 ws closed. Chatrwen Stout sUtad Mat M weld like to see chat tM pro~act proposal eight look 11ke on Mis s1ta. Ne felt this Nght De an appropriate direction to take prior to arking a deNslon on tM aeendaent. Planning Coalisslon Minutes -20- $tpteaiDer 2L, 1986. w/3 z~~ Ca~atssiontr Barker stated that he had no hesitancy in vaLtng at tMs tine, Ha stated that the appropriate deslgnatian should M Yery Low. Casialssloner Tolstoy stated that he ws on tM Caswissiort at the Lisa the map ws filed do M15 pies of property and one of the things the Cowission was quite concerned about ws the edge treataent between the Goitege and this site. Ht eaplalne0 that /t ws detl0ed at that LiN Met LM higher density would altar clustering of the units and provide open space. Ha thought that tM final proSecL e/ttgated tM rnncerns of tM peer Creek rsstdents /n that it eliowed tramttion betwen their property and this project and the dusterinq of butidin~s, open sped and tM edge trvataent also addressed itsNf to tM Collages nNds. tt seeaM that the reason the protect ws never built ws because /t ws real econaulcaly feasible to do so. He pointed out that ff the pro)ect wes developed at 4 units par acre, tMn would be a terrible grading proDiaa. Ne felt that tIN Lor Ma/gnatlen could not provide a proper tNnsltion and the only proyett alterMtfre would De Yery Low. Co~aisatoner Chitla stated Mat Aer tndinatione were the saes and agreed that Very La seats W De the appropriate Nsignattan. Casissianer akMiel stated Mat M did not Mve an objection to tM Lor dos/gnation. Otto Kraut/1, Senior planner, advised tMt tin City is CM appltunt on tMs asKna•eM rpwst. Ne asked eounsd if the City could Mnttlate the wndeent and radvergse tt in Mts Heneral Ilan cyle as a request for Yay Lor density. • Hal ph Manson, Deputy City Attorney, advised that if tM City is rilling to withdraw ite request, it Could Mnidate an aaendwnt W Ylry LOw. Jae SecIlia, npnsentlnq the pemMtil Corporation, advised that sore conceptwl plans had Dean subeltted on OMs pre~tet to Ctty taf'. ne veil that the request for tM eartinwe.. ,,;, ;,; yire ewryoM the opportunity to see what . ~d d..wiaper can d0 wits Mis piece of property, He fAL that he could solve alt o1 the concerns o/ everyone 1rrolvW. Ne asked for tine to approach Chaffey College and the Over Creek HaNOr~ers to show the the conceptwl plain and then presets thM t0 CM Co~lsslon before tMY cake a decision on tMs piece of property. Mr. Buller pointed out Mat tMs aeendeent 1s for land use and the applicant could case back r/M a proposal, but then would De no gwrmta Mat this is the wy tM prWee could be Duilt. He suggested Mat if the Cow,lsston's direction would be to conttnw tM aNndNnt ragwst for 9o days, staff could advertise the asundwM as eitMr Low or Yery Law, Xe asked if tM Coeeisston would like CM proposal Dy tM appliant W M caneeptwl or should the applicant file a tentattre sup concurrently with tlq aeenaleeM, Ilanntn9 Ca~tsslon Minutes -21- SapteeiMr 24, 1986 F .y ~1y Laa~tssloner Tolstoy stated that the proDlq he would have with filing the tenutlre pp Concurrently, is that if the Caeaisslon fMls the site should be Yery Low, tM applicant would have ode the expense of designing tM tract at• tM Low designation. Sas Sterpa, 200 W. Bien Oaks, 61erMale, California, property owner, was concerned that tM Cawfssion ws once again considering reducing tM density on his property. Ne advised that M has been in negoNattons rith tMs project wny tines. He did not feel M could find a buyer rho would De willing to canpiy wltA oM or one-Mif atn lots 1f below tM property LMre is a 12 unit per acre project. Ne advised that while M rould not De eatrealely Happy about tt, M would accept tM 2-4 unit per acre deslgnattan. He stated that a Very Lor Mslgnatlon would seriously 1nM Dit tM a>arkataD/11ty of CM property. Motion: Moved Dy Stout, seconded OY Mdltel, to coMlnw tM pu011e Mating for Environ•ental AssesseeM and 8eneral Plan Aeundpnt 86.03D and Environeentai AsseswM and Oewlopeent O1stMct 86-OS to tM Janwry 11, 1987 Punning Ca~17s1on a>tet/ng. TM landorner is to supply tM Ca~tsslon with a eonaptwl plan at Lba law designation. TM tonceptwi plan 1s to Dacoek a part of tM peraeMnt reard for caegarison of futon appllattons. Staff rs directed m provide options at botA tM Lor and YerY Low deslgnatlons. • ~ r ~ M. ENVIR018ENTAl ASSESSMENT AR8 6ENEAAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-03E - CITY OF an /Professional to Medlue Oenstty Rea/denttel (4.14 du/ac! • for 3.56 acres of and loafed at tM soutMast corner of Church an0 ArcAlDald - APM 1077-332-26. 'DP'-t3-'M'-fB=I~du/ac) Tor 3.56 acres of land loaUd at LM soutMast corner of CMroh and Archibald -APR 1077-33Z-26. Otto Krouttl, Senior Planner, presented tM staff report. CMlrawn Stout asked for clariffatton as to rhy tMs anand.ent ws proposed. Brad Butler, City Plainer, advised that eM City Council directed that all Office Professional parcels 1n tM City outside tM Haven Corridor De re- eval wted. Chalrayn Stout opened tM public Maring. Lloyd Micheal, 6320 Naves Awnw, Rancho Cueuonga, co-or+nar of tM Percal, opposed iM aaendnent. Ne did not agree tMt all Office ProfessloMi should be located on Naves Awnw and felt LM property ws appropriately designated. Planning Loa~lsston Mlnuta -22- Septanber 24, 1986• ~~~ Zi9 n ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUl„„vIONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: September 21, 1986 T0: Chairswn and Members of tM Planning Coewission FROM: Bred Buller, C1ty Planner BY: Rubin Yu, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-03D - V1Ir UI' NxIa:11U GUGRa1NGA - A request t0 Mind tM Lind Se Men 0 mere Plan from Lor Med1w Density Residential (4-8 du/x) to Lar Density Msldential (2-/ du/ac) for 66 acres of land located at tM southwest corner of N11san (1f extended) and M1111ken (1f extended) - APN 201-191-11, 11. ENYI0._ONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Mcnvlew~ eo-w - 1:l li ur MMI.mU GIA:I1111NIG11 - A request LO Control) and "UI'o~ MedlwcDens/ty Resl6entCtallFipod du/ac) to 'l' (Low Density Residential - 2-/ du/ae) for 66 xres of land located at tM southwest corner of N11son (1f extMded) and Mi111ken (1f extended) - APN 201-191-11, 17. ABSTRACT: Recently, tM C1ty Council directed the staff to ini tlate a General Plan NaendmMt for tM area east of Chaffer College bounded by Nilson, Banyan and Deer Creek CMnnel. The request is for a change from LM (4-B du/ac) to L (2-4 du/acl. In can unction with this Amendment, staff Ms initiated a Development DMStrtct AmenMaM from LM and FC t0 L to aswn consistency between the General Plan and Development Otstrlct Meps (see EaMDtt "A" ). tI. BACKGROUND: In 1982, the Planning Commission approved a vaeiTopm~ent proposal (TT 11550) for 508 condMintums and 8 single family dwellings for suUorlty of the site. In 1981, tM Planning Com~tssian approved an extension for tM trxt map for two years. In June of this year, tM pro~xt proponent requested an extension again, but 1t ws denied Dy the Planning Commission. TM project expired 1n July of this year. The easternmost 110 feet of the ana, DouMad by the college, Nilson, Banyan and the Channel (see Exhibit 'B'), is eurreMly desl9Mted FC on the Development DlstricL Map. LM of tM General Plan, and belongs to tM Flood Control D1strlet. in order to avoid fragMntatlon of future land use, this 110 foot wide strip is ~o-- 7 ~' ~ .,~- `' ., F-l6 ~3~ PLANNING CpM1SS[ON ~ F REPORT GPA 86-030 -CITY ( NCNO CUCAMONGA Septeeber 24, 1996 Page 2 included to this A~endnent. If approved, this AeendNent would result 1n the eM1re area being designated L under botA the General Plan and the DevNOpNent Cade. The flood Control District is not opposed to tM change. III. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action q ted• Change: I) The General Ptan Land Use Map ran or uN ~ sits ResldaMlal (4-B du/ac) to Law Density Residential (2-4 du/ac), and 2) The Dewlopawmt District Map fran Lai MediuN Msidantlal(4-8 du/ac)/Flood Control to Low Residential (2-1 du/ac). B. Latatlon: South s1G of Y11san Avenw (tf extended) and west oTRRTilcen Avenue (1f exuMad). C. Parcel Stu: 66 acres of land. D. Extstlna Land Use: Yeeant, undavelOped. E. Surround) Land UN end Zantn - f ng s ng f y residential (Doer Creek), • acs/gnatM Very Law ResldeiK/a1 (less than 2 du/ac); vacant, designated Yery La Residential (less than 2 du/ac). SoutA - Yeeant, desigMted Low-1Nd1ur Residenttat (4-8 du/ac) East - Yeeant, designated Flood Control. Yect. rn. f f... C.r l .... ._.. w.._......._ .. (4-B du/ac). ' ' -...'.»~ ~~~~~ "ssi uenciai G. General Plan Desi natlans: ro ec a - on- u• ansiLY Rtsidentlal (4-9 du/ac). North - Yery Low Dans/ty Residential (less than 2 du/ac). South - Low-INdius Danst~y Rasldsntlal (4-8 du/ac). East - Flood Control. lkst - Chaffey College (Public Fac111t1es). IV. ANALYSIS• TIM site 1s sltwtad between properties with GeNra1 an s gMttons of Yery Lon (less tMn 2 du/ac) to the north, and Lar-INdt~ (4-8 du/ae) to the south. As a result, then 1s a lack of appropriate transttlan 1n land uN. To eadce Natters worse, the existing Deer Creek subdlv/stan al the north s1h of N11son, 1s developed in area acre residential lots, while the wglect s1U perwtts developawmt of uD t0 9 du/ac. This raises obvious canpaLlbiltty quesLtons, particularly along Nilsen Avenw. F-/7 ~. 3 / PLANNING COMMISSION 5 F REPORT GPA 86-03D - CITY ~ NC110 CUCANONGA Septeeber 24, 1986 Page 3 • fie wb~ect site is also situated between a sasl-royal and park. like college taapus to the rest and a large Flood Control arse to the east. Aga1n, tM existing General Plan destgatia does not provide for an appropriate transitlan of land use. The proposed change to Low Danst;y Restdenttal (2-t du/acl would appear to Provide for better lend use translLlas, Mile accaaodsLing a reasonable iwel of devdopwnt cdNpatlDle with all surrounding land uses. The General Plan descrl6es the ter Density category as follows: "The low density rosideMlal classtftcat/an is cMracterized by stnglafasrily boos. TAe density is appropriate rlMre the tradltloal alghboMaod eMracter of detached single-tastily units Drwails and rIM-e the lwel of servlee including rods, shopping and reerattan are not sufflNaK to ,lusttfy a h/gMr density.' The sub~ecL area 1s saaH-rural in nature and charatterized by detached single-faNty boos with no edsweretal establlshNents or public recrwtion facilities nearby. the propesM change to low Oensity ResldeMial appars eonslsteiN; rlth tM General Plan criteria 1n all • respects. Y. ENYIRDMIENTAL ASSESSMENT: the IM ttal Study has been capletad Dy sgff associated Mth tM a e~ wvlraneental tsgacts were identified to De proposal. v7. FACTS Fql FINDINGS: Should tM Cosissta, upon exaniatia of the su ec a an Aondrnt aM Developwent District Aondrnt, decide that tM change would praoq tM land use Bats and policies of the Gearai Plan, would not M otarlally detrloMal to tM ayaunt properties or would not cause signiflanL adverse envirawntal 1Npacts, the following an tht findings tMt an necessary upon approval: A. the Aondonts do not Conflict with the Land Use Policies Of the General Plan; and B. The Aondeents do pronste goals of the Land Use Eleennt; and C. The AondNnts would ai D• nterlally 1n~ur10us Or detriMntal t0 tM adlacent properties; and D. That the wb~ect property 1s w/gble for tM uses persMttM 1n the proposed dlstrlet in tars of aeeess, s1ze, and eaegat1b111ty with existing land use 1n wrranding areas. F ~CJ ~y2 PLANNING CpNISSION S F REPORT GPA 86-03D - CITY ~ NLNO CUCAMONGA SeptaMr 21, 1986 Page t • YI. CORNESPONOENCE: fits itw has Dean advertised as a publle he+rtng in The o a DropartY oNMprs wltMin ~0 fK ofstplle pro~actnsitaLtces wre stn YII. REGOMEMDATION: Staff reeoaaaxids approval 01 tM IWndwnts. If the La~'ii 3's1an~Teds the NNndaMlnts to tM Oaneral Plan and DarelopaMnt Otstrtct Maps wrrantad, adoption of Liu attached Resolutions ratos~nMing approval to tM Ctty Counetl of the General Plan and DevelopoiK 0lstrtct A~aiKrents and Lhe lsswnee of a Negative Oeclaratfan could be appropriate. Re tfully s ed r ller C1ty Piannar 88:RY:ko Attathrants: ExhlDtt 'A' - ganerd Plan and Dawlopswit Otstrtet Naps ExMD1L '!' -Flood Control Property Resoluttan Of Approval • ~~9 z _ _~: ___ ~" ==^ -=_ ;~:' h ^ _ • --- - e == Q~naral Wan --•- .. _,. ~ / L ur' ~ LM ec - _ ~ LMv [~ . ~ 'I ~C ~IF~NCI ;- a M~ ~~ --`~t~dNwl __ -- SITE Fc CARYN PLANN~l~ M COMMUNITY Dawlopmant DlstriCb w^„ ~OItT{ I G~A~- ~6-03 D CITI OP ITr~o ~(Z,4-~'6-DS" R.-~~CHO CLC.'1~IO~G.a TITLE _ PL:\N~I\C UI\'15IOV e~nlrn'.~ ~~sc,u.l; ~~~ _ - ~~ - I'. 1. 97.r~' IJU~ - • ~ r n ~ ;~_ ~ ~ y'I ~ ~~ . I I i . _ _ - 1 I I # ~ ~ ~~~ NOItTi 1 I ~ ~ • uI-M-OD-U3U ~ .. ~ / DDA-86-05 ~ ~ f / ' ~. ~ '% / EXH~IT B F-~l ~ 3+' • • RESOLUTION NO. 87-35 A RESOLUTIOI OF THE DI.AIININ6 CDMNISSIDN OF THE CITY OF RANCHO LUCAMDNGII, CAL1f0RNIA, RECOMNENOIN6 APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AIEIIDIENT ND. 86-03D, AIENDIN6 THE ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMDNGA DENERAL PLAN FROM LDN MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 14-8 DNELLIM6 UNITS/ACRE) TO L011 DENSItt RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DNELLIN6 UNITS/ACRE) FOR 68 ACRES DN THE SOUTMiEST CORNER OF THE EKTENSIONS OF NILSON AND MILLIKEN. NHEREAS, the P1 anM ng Coswl ssion has held a duly advertised WDlic hearing to consider all caanents on the proposed General Plan Aeendeent No. 86-03D. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucaeonga Planning Commission hereby smokes the follow nag T1n~Tngs: A. The Mendeant does not conflict with the Land Use Po11c1es of the General Plan. B. TM Aesa,deenL praeptes goals of the Land Use Elaswmt. C. TM MendsrM would not De ieaterlally tn~uri ous or detrlMngl to the adlacent properties. ' • SECTIDN 2: The General Plan Land Use !Yp shall ba meended as follows: freer Law-Medlar DensltY Residential (4-8 dwe111ng units/acrel to low Density Residential (2-4 dwellt~ units/acnl for 6B acres on the southwest corner of the extensions of Nilsen and Milliken - APN 2U1- 191-11, 17. SEtTIdI 3: A iNgattve Declaration 1s hereby reeaMnded for adoption by a Council for this General Plan Nendewlnt, Dared upon the caaptetlon and findings of the Initial Study. Ndl, THEREFORE, BE tT RESOLVED, that tM Raneho Cuunonga Planning Casssission does hereby raceaesend approval of General Plan Arendeent No. 86-03D to the C1ty Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1987. PLANN SIGN IE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGII BY: ATTEST: ra n ary aa6 PLANNING COIMISSION ' SOLUTION N0. GENERAL PLAN AIIEIRIIE. K-03D March 25, 1987 Page 2 I, Brad 8u11er, Deputy Secretary o1 tha Planning Caa~tssian of the City of Rancho Cuca~onga, do hereby certify tMt the foregoing Resolution ws duly and regularly Introduced, passM, and adopted 6y the PHlming CoaeMssfon of the City of Rancho Cuueonga, at a regular neeting of the Planning Lca~lssian held on the 25th day of Marts, 1987, by the foliwing vote-tO-Mft: AYES: C@MISSIONERS: EMERICK, TOLSTOY. BARKER. MCNIEL NOES: CQIMISSIOI~RS: CNITIEA ABSENT: C@MISSIONERS: NONE • • r~ ~?7 • RESOLUTION N0. 87-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMOIIGA PLANNING COIMi5510N RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DISTRICT CHANGE N0. 86-05 REpUESTING A CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM "FC' AND 'LM' TO 'L' Fpl 68 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHNEST CORNER OF THE EXTENSIONS Oi NILSON IUD MILLIKEN - APN 201-191.11, 17. NHEREAS, on the 15th day of July, 1986, an application ws f11ed and accepted an tM abort-dascrtbed protect; end NNEREAS, on tM 25th day of Msreh, 1987, tM Planning CaasHsslan Mld a duly advert/sed public hNring pursuant to Section 65854 of tM California 6overn~mt Code. SECTION 1: TM RanMO Cucatonga Planning Ca~isslan Ms Mda tM followingTi dings: 1. TMt tM wD~eet DroPN'tY is wltaDle for tM uses pena/ttad to tM praposad district to tans of access, siu, and cosgat1D111ty w1tA existing land use 1n tM wrroundtng area; and . • 2. TMt tM propostd district changt could not Mve slgnifluM tagaei on tM environsant nor tM wrrounding propertlas: and 3. TMt tM Droposad district chMge 1s in confonaance wi tl~ uw b~nerU %Nn. SECTION 2: TM RaneAo Cucaapnga Ptanntng Casatsston Ms found tMt this pro ec w not erea4 a s/gnlflcaM adverst /sgaet on tM envtrorwnt and recawnds lswance of ^ Negatlvt Daclaratian on March 25, 1987. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That purswnt to Sactton 65850 to 65855 of the California 6overnaant Code, tMt tM Planning Ca~lssian of tM C1ty of Rancho CucaaaMga Mraby recapends approval on CM 25th day of March, 1987, D1strlct CMnge No. 86-05. 2. The Planning Ca~lsslon MnDy reco~ands that tM City Counctt approve and adopt District Change No. 86-05. 3, That a Certlfltd Copy Of this Rtsolutton and nested arterial Mnby adopted Dy tM P1anMng Caasatsslan shall M forrardad to tM C1ty Council. „~ 38 PIANNIN6 CDMIISSiDN "SDlUTION ND. DEVELDPMENT DISTRIC'~ o£NDlENT B6-OS Wrch 25, 1987 Page 2 APPROVED AND ADDPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1987. PLANNING ~I~ C1TY OF RANCHO CUCAMON611 ATTEST: i, Brad Buller, MputY Sacntary of t1M Plannl~ Canslsslan of the Ctty of Rancho Cueaeonga, do hereby Gritty that Lhe foregoing MsoluLlon ws duly and regularly 1Mroduced, passed, and adopted by tM Pinming Casalssian of the City of Rancho Cucuonga, at a regular naetl of tM Planning Caieatss/on held on the 25th day, of March, 1987, DY the follo~ng rote-towlt: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, MCNIEL. BARKER, TDLSTOY NOES: CDMMISSIOIERS: CH[TIEA A85ENT: COIMISSIONERS: NONE C~ • X39 Ci • -~°~~ll STAFF REPORT ~ ~ ` a ~ ~~ DATE: March 25, 1987 is-- T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13542 -DEER '~ ws om o su v s on o s ng a am parcels an 66.65 acres of land in the Low Medium Density Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located east of Chaffey College between Nilson gvenue and Banyan Street - APN 201-191-I7 and a portion of 201-191- 11. I. ABSTRACT: Earlier during tM s meeting, the Planning Commission re~e~General Plan Amendment 87-02A to modify the Circulation Element, and reviewed General Plan Amendment 86-030 and Development District Anw!ndnlent 86-05 to modify the land use and Development District from Low-Medium Density Residential to Low or Very Law Density Residential. If the Planning Commission recommends approval of the Circulation Element modification and the change from Low-Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residentiai, the .P1ao~J~,y Cawvi»ion may consider tentative Tract 13542 based on the merits of the pro3ect. If the Planning Cammisston recommends denial of the Circulation Element and/or recommends approval of a Very Low Density Residential designation, the Planning Commission may deny Tentative Tract 13542 based en inconsistencies with the General Plan and Development Code or may continue this Stem until the General Pian Amendments and Development District Amendment have been heard by the City Council. Ii. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re nested: Approval of the subdivision design, conceptua gra ig plan, and issuance of a negative declaration for a 206 lot custom subdivision. 9. Protect Density: 3.09 dwelling units per acre. C. Surraundin Land Use and Zontn art - ng a am y es en ial and Vacant, Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 du/ac) South - Vacant, Low Medium Density Residential (4-8 du/ac) East - Oeer Creek Channel, Flood Control west - Chaff@y College, Low Medium Density Residential (4-8 du/ac ). ~y~ ITEN G PLANNING COIaMISS IC' STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 1. - DEER LREEK March 25. 1987 Page 2 • D. General Plan Desi nations: rat rte - Low um ensity Residential (4-8 du/ac) North - Very low Density Residential (less than 2 duyac) South - Low Mediuw Density Residential (4-8 du/ac)' East - Flood Control west - Chaffey Collage E. Site Characteristics: The site is currently vacant with the s ope o approx ma e y 8Z from north to south. The site is bounded by the Nilson Avenue extension to the north, and Deer Creek Channel to the east, the Banyan Street extenslon to the south, and the Chaffey College Stadium, baseball field, and parking lots to the west. I[I. ANALYSIS: A. Back round: On duly 14, 1982 the Planning Coimatssion approved en a ve ract 11550 consisting of 508 condominiums and 8 sirgle family resldences. The plan called for the single family residences fronting on to 411son Avenue to he on 1 acre lots to provide a more gradual transition from the existing 36,000 squaro fool lots on the north side of Nilson Avenue. Also, the malority of the area located adjacent to Chaffey • College was devoted to recreation aM open space area to buffer the residential units from the activities taking place at Chaffey College. ^c .cr:. 11 l:;,f, TeAtutlre T,o~L 11550 came oerare Lne Planning Canaaission requesting a final one year extension of time. At that time, the Commission stated their concerns about the development not meeting the energy conservation requirements, the cowpatibility with the surrounding area, and the adequacy of the circulation system proposed for the site and surrounding area. As a resuit, the time extenslon was denied. Following the Planning Commission's denial of the time extenslon for Tentative Tract 11550, the City Council initiated a General Plan Amendment and Development District Amendment to explore the options of low or Yery Low Density Residential destg nations for the site. • ~,y/ PLANNING CWMISS IC :TAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13ar2 -DEER LREEK March 25, 1987 Page 3 General The applicant is submitting a proposal of single aml y s that they feel addresses the concerns expressed by the City. The development of the 206 lots will result in an overall density of 3.09 dwelling units per acre. This would provide a smoother transition between the Very Law Density Residential Designation to the north and the Low Medium Density Residential Designation located to the south of the project. The lots proposed for the protect range in size from 8,150 square feet to 19,547 square feet in area with a average of 10,923 square feet in area. Also, the applicant is proposing to extend Nilson Avenue and Banyan Street to the Deer Creek Channel thus allowing for the future connections Lo Milliken Avenue. The applicant is also proposing a public street that will connect Nilson Avem~e and Banyan Street. C. Desi n Review Caawittee: The Design Review Comaittee (0. arcer, o son , rev ewed the protect on January 22, 1987, and recommended approval subtect to the following conditions: 1. The original proposal submitted by the applicant proposed a cirwlatton spine with a direct connection between Nilson Avenue and Banyan Street. The Design Review Casittee felt that the circulation spine • (Canistel Avenue) should be modified to provide a defined break in the connection between Nilson Avenue and Banyan Street in order to reduce the potential traffic speeding and to improve the site distance vie 1h 1114v of int~reKHnnt Tho ro_a17~nnn of of iM circulation spine should be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 2. The side-on cut-de-sacs should be landscaped by the applicant to provide a consistent theme along the circulation spine (Canistel Avenue). 3. Corner side yard fencing (decorative masonry black) should be installed by Lhe applicant. 4. Landscaping should be provided to buffer the residences fns Chaffey College. The plans should De reviewed and aDProved Dy Lhe City Planner. :. Landscaping should be installed to provide a smooth transition between the existing Deer Creek Community to the north and the proposed development. ~Y~- PLANNING COMMISS I' STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13ar2 -DEER CREEK March 25, 1987 Page 4 Technical Review Committee: Durfly the Technical Review amm+ttee meet ng o anuary 20, 1987, staff noted that the applicant was proposi+g a number of drainage connections to the Deer Creek Channel. In staff's experience, the Flood Control District has generally not permitted the number of connections proposed by the applicant. Staff is concerned that if the Flood Control District does not permit the connections, the grading, as proposed by the applicant, may have to be alternated to drain the streets back towards the center of the site. The Lity is in receipt of a letter frbm the flood Control District stating that they are not approving the connections at this time but may consider them in the future as more detailed information is available (see attached letter}. Therefore, staff recommends that if Lhe connections are not fmproved a~ significant changes in the grading plan, as determined by the City Planner and City Etgineer, are necessary, the revised grading plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Grading Committee prior to the issuance of any permits. E. Envlromaental Assessment: Staff has completed the • env ronmen a c c s and found no significant adverse environmental ialpacts as a result of this pro,}ect. If the Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a negative declaration would De in order if the Tentative Tract Map is approved. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: If the Planning Commiaaiuo aad Cit; rM'^."_+1 approve-~enerT-PTan Amendment 87-02A, and approve General Plan Amendment 86-03fl and Development District Amendment 86-05 from Low- Medium Density Resi dentf ai to Low Density Residential, the pro,}ect will be consisted with the General Plan and Development Code. The pro3ect will not be detrimental to the public health, or safety or cause nuisance or significant adverse envfronment impacts. In addition, the proposed use and site plan together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with applicable D*ovisions of the Development Code and City Standards. V. CORRESPONDENCE; This item has been advartfsed in the Dail Re ort Newspaper as a public hearfng and notices were Sent to a property owners within 300 feet of the project site. • ~H3 PLANNING COMA SS If STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13>r2 - DEER CREEK March 25, 1987 Page 5 RECDMiENDATiON: If the Planning Commission approves General Plan n nt to modify the Circulation Element and General Plan Amendment 86-030 and Development District Amendment 86-05 from Low- Medium Density Resident tai to low Density Residential, staff recommends that the Planning Coaissfon approved Tentative Tract Map 13542 through adoption of the attached Resolution with conditions. Res ctfully i d, Brad Bu er City Planner BB:SM:sgr Rttachments: Exhibit •A" -Site Utilization Map ExMbit •8' - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit •C• - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit •D' - letter from Flood Control District • Resolution of Approval with Conditions .~yN :~ o~ ., \ORZ ~~ crr~r or ,~,,: ~ ~y2 RAnCHO CL'CA1ViCh\'GA Tm~:,sr~ ,~-~~.z.,li../ PLA1Wi IKC DtVLS10N E~cxiarr:!9 SG~~: 3, 4+' cc~ or RAl~'CHO CL'CA.,~IO~~'GA PtAtvNt~c otvc5-tav \ORT tTE~ t: ~Tr /33S/2 • TtTCF~ __?~`JSrJiIT/Vt ~list^T E~HIWT: __ 8 / SG\LE ~Y~ u~bn G _________________rr _, _____.____ ~~ ~~ ~ i 1 1 f 1I ' I -•. I 1 1 1 I ~~I \ i rO 1 ~ ' ~ tJ ' Ili ; ~ ~ ~ ~ g 1 II i ~ `' ~ ~ ~ ° i /~ l h0 ~ O ~ g 1 y ~ ! 1 ~~ i I '! m i i~ m j 1 ~`~~: • O i~ f m~ I ! m 1 i v''~'.i ' I t }I I ~, f I. I^ ~ ~ ~ m~ 1 1 I ~ ~.1m ~i:~ e ~~~1 ~_ ~ 1 y~~~. I ~ ~ ~ ,T~JJ m i i. X19 ! , ( W'm ~ ~ ,i n-. ~ I11 '~~ ~ I { 7; t. 1 ~I . ~ ~ I ?. ~ T ~ '~- cis or• ITE,i: ~ ~~ K~\'CfiO CL'G~,VIOi\'GA rr~:~yror//E,Z~-~- PI.aNML~ ~~~ E~CHI[UT: 2 ~_ SG\IF ~Y7 ~~ h ~`a ~ ~ .. A C2C 1 T ~~~~~ Y~)~+ ~R~ ~ \~ ~` • • .` \' CITY OF rrE~l: Tr i3s~s/2 RA1~'CHO CL;CAlv10-\'GA ~: '~rrr~ ,~.~T PL'1NNItVG D[VL'W'laN E`CHIWT~~_SG~LE oZ Y 8 ~ ~ ~ ' 1 ~ l 1 ~ v ~ ~ 60\i) ~N ~\Y\tl i • P QZC I cis or ~~'cHO cLCA,~a~~c~ PL.aI~INIi~C p(~y-ipN .2YS I'I'E~ b _ TT /,~y2 m'om'-~n~'' '~ ~~- E~CHIW'r: ~_ SG~IE• ` ~ I ' NryNi'i~ ~~IINi CITY OF RAi\~CHO CL'Cr~V101\'G~- PL~(YNI~~'G p[V'SSON „~ ~ o rrE.~ is ~~r /3Sy2 'f'R'tE ~f~jj/s1L ~Oi^-'L EYHIUR: _~_ SG\LE: CITY OP x.~'cxo cl:c.~vla~~cA P1.AIvN1~C DNLSfOiV R'E~4-fT ,!~$y2 E~CHIDIT: l2 _ ~,~~, a +'i c~~ or RAI~'CHO CL'Cr~~1oi\'Gor~ ~~vwt~c atvtsiav ITE11 ~ ~ S~2 • Ttr~: -C,~(~o~,ec czo~n~ E~CHtIttT: ~ SCi~LtE; as-~ Q=-Q __ ___ .4 ,' ~ I+Y-,r, •d~t ~I rte' ~~ ~ 11 ~ ^Pf ' . ~; ~ ~ ~i ,`ten ~' ._._ Y i 1 c !1_- T Y s._~. JL_ ~ I ,J M9^I J l r-~--~ i P "~ ~j I~ I~ J~ 6 ~~ I~ ~ 4 ~~ti .G; v „4 :{ ~~.._ y r ~~ ~ ~ fi 1 I .!,. ~ ~ i r ~` 7 ~~ I. I ",~ _`" ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ i {151' ~fi' ,' ~ ~ ., ~ I.. "'""-'~ ~ ~~ 1 I ya J O J H aI 1 r--, ~ i :~ ilit a li 'i 6•€ +,~-,~;= ~' ~~. h sip _~ ~; ~~ CITY 01' rrt~il ~~ /..3Sy2 RAi1CH0 CLCr11~IC1\'Gr~ rrrt~: ~~~iuv~ c,~a~/r~ Pla.'VNI\C DIVISION exHiorr: _~ SG\LE ~S~ DEPARTMENT OF TRAA_rORTATION/ \\11~y CGUNTENVIaoNN7ElITAIa~ FLOOD CONTROUAIRPORTS ~~,~ ~t weuc woaNa ADENCv axe Eem Itwa geem • ben iE111EleYN. CA !Z{ta-Oa36 • 171{1 3g7 da00 ~~~ ~:~ MICHAEL G WALKER • ~ngy~(1~~~ DPKtO. Mareh 4, 7987 File: 1-507/1.00 Tract 11550 City oC Rancho Cucamonga Eng lneering DS vision ., P.O. Boz 809 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 nw / ~~~ ~ ~ F•A'NC~J ,;;;•,yC.ha l U ~ I IF:a ~~, ~rN Attention: Mr. ~A ~%" Re: Zone 1, Deer Creek Channel Tentative Tract 135g2 Gentlemen: Reference Ss made Lo your transmittal Kith aeeompan yin{ Tentatl ve Tract Map No. 735N2 and ngwsting the District's rev leN arW coEmenb. Tha tentative tract Ss lxated on the south afda of Mil son Avenbe, Oetwan Chaffay College and Deer Creak Channel, in the north portion of the City of Rancho Cucmeonga. • In our opinion, this proposed development is reaeonebly free of serious Clood hazards from maJor flood channels and drainage courses. Portions of the site say De auOJect to ezaeaa Sve street flog and accumulated ^r x!^~ge °- - - IC is Lilereion reoo®ended that a separate report 6e oDtaln ed from~VtM~ CSty Enginnr's Office with respect to local and on-site drainage conditions. Our reoommendatlons aN as follows: 7. A aiz foot block Nall or other District aDProvad barrier shall De provided along the aaE aide of the tentative tract. 2. IL !a noted that Sntlrnal dninags La to Oa outlettetl into Deer Creek through aiz aids drains along the east boundary of the propose0 subdivision. The number of storm drain oonnec lions shall De limited to one (1) at Baryon Avenw and one (1) at Mllson Avenue. 3. A permit must De obtained through the Distrletla Field Engineering Ofvisien prior to any setly ley on District right~of-Nay including ere area nfarrad Lo on the Tentative Tract Map as "Excess Flood Control Land", unless current fight-ot-Nay negotiations have bean con summand prior to the start of conatruation activity. At the time of permit rev ieN the number and location of the proposed aide drains will ba revlewd N1 th napeet to apec.ria rvquirementa by both tM Olstr ice and the Corps of Enginwrs. ,Ej(/~/B/T ,a .~ sy Letter to tha city of Rancho Cucamonga March u, 1987 Page 2 • Should you have any further questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact the undersigned at (71L) 3g7-2515. Y~ery~tr1u~ly yours, ROBERT M. GORCHERO, Chlsf flatar Resources Division RMC: HY3: m,1 a ce: Ken Nilliama, Flood Control Engineering JSm Dunn, Field En sneering • C~ a s~ DESIGN REVIEN COMMENTS 6:30 - 7:00 Scott January 22, 1987 CYS 0 sY r s ql ~ O ~-- "~^" aaa~c - In:EN GREEK - A s n9 e y parce s on acres of land 1n the Lor-Ilsdlw Dxslty ResldenNal District (1-8 dws111ng units per aerel. lawtad xst of Chaffey Collage Detwax Mflson Avenw and Banyan Strxt - APN: 201-191-17 and a portion of 201-191-11. leek ~o~wd On July 14, 1982 tM Planning Caslsslon app~M Tentative Tract 11550 consisting of 505 eondoHntu~s aiM 8 single faanlly residences. the plan called for the single faedly nsldanees fronting onto N11son Aremue to ba on one acre lop to prortda a sRwv gradwl trssltlon frs the existing 36,000 sauan fool lots on the north side of Nilson Arenw. Also, the s>yoMty M the area located ayatant to Chaf/ey College ws devoted to recrstianal and span space arxs to buffer the residsnttal unip its the acttrltlp taking place at ChatfeY•College. On June 11, 1916, TenGtlve Tract 11550 cast before the Plaimtng Co~tsslon reellesLing a final one yxr extension of t1s. At that tine, the CaaaHsslon stated tMtr concerns about tM dwtlaparllt not aawlttng the energy consmattan nqufrerents, the coapetlbllty with the surrounding arN, and tM adpuaey of tM clrculatton cysts proposed for the sip and surroumNne ,... e. _.... dMled. - _. __. ._ - ...,, ., w~a tiw eALew5l oil waS Deslen Paraeetere The site is currently vacant Mth a slope of aDDroxtstely 7f frae north Lo south. TAe site 1s bounded by tM Ntlsan Avxw extension to tM north, tM Deer Creek Channel to tM xst, the Banyan Strxt expnsion to tM south, aM tM CMifey Collage Spolula, baseball field, area parking lots to tM west. soft Casts S1te Dl an: N1tA the previous application for this site, tM t at1b11ity with surrounding areas and buffering tM residences hole CMifey College were ~a L r1 ~J DESIGN REYIEY COMMENTS TT 13542 -DEER CREEK CO. January 22, 1987 Page 2 concerns expressed by the Planning Coearlsslon. The previous subelttai proposed one acre lots fronting onto Ytlson Avenue. Nfth the current proiect proposal, lots no longer front onto N11son, but rather are oriented inwards towrds the proieet interior. Staff feels th/s to be a aprc approprlaU design. Y14san 1s identified as a secondary street, and the General Plan directs tMt direct aaess onto secondary streets De liadted. These lots that aro dlrecLly ad,acent to Ntlsan range to size frasi 9,570 square feet W 18,940 square feet. Staff believes these lots are generally sufficient to size to provih adequate trensitton with existing rcsldences t0 tM north, but mould wggest LINt lots 2-4 M enlarged to a elnlwee of 10,000 square feet as a cans to further enhance this trans/t1on. The second issue, Duffering free the college, was addressed on the prcviaus subNtgl througA an extens/ve recreettanal and open span area. TM wrrenL proposai has lots 6aeking up•to the college. TM applicant tndtutes that M Aas bean worklnq with the college to provide additional landsuping on the college property. Also, the applicant has • expressed a desire to eanstrutt a 6 foot to 8 foot Dlaek moll along tDe vast property boundary. To date, nothing to writing Ms been received free Chaffey College. Staff feels that t110 opttena are avatlabie to provide adequate buffering for tM lots. First landscaping on tM COlleee Draefrty could ha lntixllM ~uA~.'~ ~~ ..,.i ~. w..~ ......, -e the college and the C1ty Planner. Or second, tf landscaping un not De instilled on the college, planting can be requ{red an tM lots syacent to the college suWect to review and approval of tM C1ty Planner. Staff reeoweends tMt tM landseapliy M Provided on the rcsldenttal lots to allow the property owners greater control over the care and reeoval of the tress and/or shruDS. Landscaping The project, as proposed, indicates two cut-de-sacs (Street '8' and Street 'C') that side onto Canlsbl Avenue. Staff feels that the area between the terdnus of the eui-de-sacs and Cantstel Avenue should be landscaped Dy the developer at tM saw ties sod to a sooner canslstent with the tandscaptng design for Canlstel Avenue. Circulation In reviewing tM clrculatlon for the dewlopwnt, staff w6ialts that the aeount of curvature of Canlstel Avenue results in decreased sight design • ~ s7 Revter Coawents TT 135!2 -DEER CREEK CO. January 22, 1981 Page 3 dlsUnce vis1b111ty for drirars pulling auL fray Street '0' and $LreeL "E'. Stiff IgtN tINL thaw an LMO posslbla altarMtlrN to rasolva the confllcU IsN attached). The first altarnattw mule be to educe the curvatuw of GnisUl AranN. The satond atUroatiw mould be U iaake Street 'D' a side-an al-de-sac and construct a street cannaettng Stwet 'C' to Street 'f . Stiff fNif tMt AlUwatlw [, 1NSN1ng tM curvature, 1s pwferabl• 1n order U adntadze the nunber of lots abutting Chatfq Collage. Grading a~ppituttaendlscu~~oro rl~ the apUpllunt~lnduUsthiat nstdanus construetad an stw rlls rlLh ra/sad rood floow aw Mt conslderad. M a wsult, tM only grading that r111 be naussary r111 be for construtttan of Na strNU and assaclatad A~rovaoanU. • Dastge aerlwr CaaaalLtaa ALt1M Reobers Pwsant: Stiff P1anMr: Scott Murphy ~a3 ~~ \ORT ~ cis or ~E\.: ~,c~,Z RAI~'CHO CL'CA~vIOi~'CAAA mom: ~GWtsirF / _ Pf.1\P1N1KC D(VLSION E`CHI(11T~ 5G\LE ~s9 \OR7 CITY QI' RAr'CHO Ct;CAl~IC1\'GA r~rnvihc ~[v~s~o~v awe T~~ ~/ilr~VL Z E`CHIOR: _ ~~~, RESOLUTION N0. 81-37 • A RESOLUTION Of THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIq, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT WIP N0. 13542 MNEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 13542, hereinafter "Map" submitted by the Deer Creek Company, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamo~a, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential subdivision of 66.65 acres of land into 206 single family lots located east of Chaffey College between Nilson Avenue and Banyan Street (APN 201-191-17 and a portion of 201-191-11) regularly came before the Planning Cownission for public hearing and action on Marcn 25, 1987; and MHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended aDProval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and MHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOM, THEREFORE, the Planning Caawission• of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: • SECTION 1: The Planning Commisstpn makes the following findings in regard to eT n naive Tract Mo. 13542 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative Lract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code. and spec if is olanr (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent witA the General Plan, Development Code, and speciffc plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of Lhe subdivision is not likely to cause substantial enviromnental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. aei PUNNING COMNI SS[ON "SOLUTION N0. TENTATIVE TRACT 135 -DEER CREEK March 25, 1987 Page 2 • (gl That this protect rill not create adverse iegacts on the envlronent and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Nap No. 13542, a copy of which is attached erc s hereby approved suglect to all of tM following conditions and the aLLached Standard Conditions: Planning Division 1. Approval of ientati ve Tract Nap No. 13542 sMll De contingent upon approval of General Plan AaxndeenL 87-02A, General Plan AewmdeenL 86-03D, and DevelopwenL District AeNena•ent 86-05. 2. TM side-on cut-de-sus shall be landsuped and irrigated to provide a consisUnt tMar along the circulation spine (Canistel AvMw). Plans sMll be nriered and approved Dy LM City Planner prior to tM isswnce of building pereits. 3. Corner side yard fencing (dtcorative'iasonry black) sMll be nautnd. TM laution and type of uaterlals for LM wall shall be shown on tM • landsupe plan which shall M nvlerM and approved by tM City Planner prior to the isswnce of bull d1 ng pent ts. 6 1 AY'nn1~1 v. u~n_n,.~ 61.vL all eM11 6~ .w.I rA r~~-. around tM entire tract perleNter.- TM location and type of ewtertals sMll De shown on tM landscape Dian which shalt be roviewed and approved by LM City Planner prior to the isswnce of building pens Ls. 5. Landscaping sM11 M provided to buffer the residences along the vest property line free Chaffey College. TM plans sMll De reviewed and approved by Lhe C1Ly Planner prior to isswnce of building pereits. 6. Landscaping along Nilson Avenw shall be installed to Provide a saaoth transldon Detwnn tM proposed Bevel opaNnt and LIN existing Dm Creek CattiuAl ty fA tM north. 7. If substantial changes are nQuind to tM grading plan, as detenined by tM CtTy Planner, City Engineer, or Bu11 ding Dfficlal, tM plan s`a11 De • reviewed and approved by tM Ending Ca~itLee prior to tM tsswna of any pereits. X61 PLANNING COMMISSI01' 'SOLUTION N0. TENTATIVE TRACT 135.- - PEER CREEK March 25, 1987 Paye 3 Engineering Division Banyan Avenue: a. The portion along the project frontage shall be dedicated and constructed as a standard half width Street with Tu11 isgrovenents on the north side and 26 feet of pave~ent within a 40 foot dedt ati on. b. The portion frog the west tract boundary to Beet the existing portion to the west shall contain a 26 foot wtdf pavenent centered within the ultinaU right-of-way; however, a 40' ~1n1eu• width right-of-way shall pe provided 1M ttally. A per~it and easaaents shall be obtained frtA• tM Iktropolltan Hater District for the portion within Its right-of-way. c. The portions described to a and b shall be constructed wltn Phase [tI as ,shown on the plans. • 2. Secondary access shall De provided for all Phases as approved by tM Foothill Fin District. 3. The portion of Master Plan Store Drain Ltne No. 3-K shall M constructed frost peer Creek Channel to the we>L i.r.~t wwi,wi f, n d:brS ,`-': r. -.`.cll provided at the westerly in1eL~ or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The developer shall be eligible for ninbunwent of the cost of construction in accordance with C1ty Ordinance No. 15. 4. Internal stop drain facilities shall be provided as necessary based upon a f1na1 dnlnage study approved by the City Engineer. In particular, the need for flow interception at the intersection of Canlstel with D Street shall be addressed. Also protection frc~ drainage t0 the north of the site shall be addressed. 5. All store drain connections to Deer Creek Channel shall be subject to the approval of tree Flood Control District. Any redesign of the proposed swtw drain systaa dw to district requlr4ents shall be subjeet to the approval of tM City Engineer. 6. RioyhhL-of-way shall De provided for 44ccess reaps to Dtir Creak Channel at Banyan and N11son Avenues as reconnendad by ttN Flood Control District and approved by the C1ty Engineer. .1ro3 PANNING LOMMISSIOY 'SOLUTION N0. TENTATIVE TRACT 136 _ - DEER CREEK March 25, 1987 Page 4 C.~ The developer shall bear all costs incurred (including condeanation proceedings) in the acquisition of Lhe off-site right-of-way required for storm drain and street construction tf it is not acquired by some other means Drier to recordation"of the Final Map. An agreement to this effect between the Developer and the Cfiy shall be executed prior to recordation of the Final Map. Approval of th15 tentative tract map is contingent upon the City Council approval of General Plan Amendments 86-030 and 87-OZA and Development Oistrlct AmeMment 86-05, Buildirg Division 1. Aii drainage across lots shall be conveyed in easements and drainage devises reviewed and approved by the 8uiiding Official. APPROVED 1110 ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1987. PLANN 5 N THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA . 0Y: ATTEST: ~i '-g-rE~g'ul'1er-, epu y ecretary [, Brad Bulier, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Caaanissfon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Punning Caamiission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Ptanntng Cammfssion held on the 25th day of March, 1981, by the following vote-to-wft: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, CHITIEA, BARKER, EMERICK, TOLSTOY NOES: LOMNISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: LOiM1IS$IONERS: NONE • aLy .g.t, y 4;'!,S; !4', %4 y1 ~S '~a $ +~ ss + .'~ /J d O r d 5 ~ S V ••• yr4% S § ~ 1~~11 .z~~s4 ;~ . ~ ~, ~ ~'sA'~'~~` is 1`r ~ s t '!~ ~. . a ~ - ~ r 1 ~ 1=+1 ~~ ~ s iii' y~y • -a o i ~ ~ ~~ =' N\ ~ i ~~ \ :, ~. ~~~~ 0 r <~ X. G ti • ' Y i~~~~sss1~~ ~ _ ? +~~~'r 3 d s3, 3s"~3-1 skys ~ •g~'Y~~~ ~ 7 j = . - 5=[ i. '~?x's-±s~;g~ ~~~ ~~ i~~'~Is~ ji~~--'~`i [~i~ Y •E~ 3_~~E~~S d „- . ._-s ! -;~ :-~ ~ ~ t_9i[~i's~E ~ ~~ a s :;nf =t =f 3~a ga~~~ Y 7~: ~~~ffs ~i~~J! :lts' ~~~~~ ~~Ess ,: ;~~y~ __ Ei~~~ r !~ i s C Y ~s ~ g ~ ~~ F ~~ Y~~ t itS :.j ;sa r~~ jis ;~i ii! :~ :s3 3!! j~~ 3~==s .t'- ~1= a~t~3 ''a==: ;s;-~ #~s~ta 3~ty! j=~Dj •d-~7 ~'i~" !i i~ sil8 ~iesa: .: _~ ~~~~~ Y~~ =e' '~Y H~ :~~ ~~'~ =~~f Z = _~~_ ~sii `F~l7 E~'EL .sia a.t~~ Ewi~f ~~ ~ ~•~ •) =y } ~ ~I ~ s~si!"rt=~ ~~ I ~ i i.~3~j~i~s ~~. ; ie ~s Y:R~~ I=~ i a 4 3 s=-ff~s~~ a s ~ n 1= 3r~F~.s~E .~j ta ~~ ~~8~`i s~ ~id 0 I ~.~ ssY=~~,~_ i f ~ ~ a ~`~as '~ ~ 3~ ~s:3 3~!p" ~~; ~ s s is ai.l~a=s .~ b~" M ~~ u u 0 ,''s ~3~1 ~~'ii_'Y_ ~ 1 gxa 8 tty€::~ =Yji ~;-= i-OYEi~~± .ia~ '~y~ gie'ii~:x- ! i .1~ !_ red :!;_ -aa~ a 1 ~'-- / t Ye, ~` 3:11 .~ir iitli d.s0~~ly~ i~ 3_x'_~'` ~~ ~~~= 3 ~ ~Yi=ldaa:i ~ 't. jYi .i s!!~$~! ~iic~ ~~~~! ~335E~~~~~ I ( ~ g~s:sls a"es ! ':as zd '~~~3ia~ Sri ~ .~rl #~ x_s-- ~'' _8i! e- :l:.g.' 1_.t ! ~j' 3S~ i i~ 1= L~ ~•~i~! ~i ~k l~• S .l=~i7l i~~? lr 7r~- fl ~~;sS :li d_ii 3~ !Y ~ ~ ~idt~li ~ plid ~: 3~~1t is :i:~tllt 3~'i I =.~~li m~~ .I rl .il ~ ~ !I r • L=:~ =~ ,t =:_ 1 zse~ ~' Epp i3r ~! 1 4~~ .y s-- i~: st 1! ~a',r _ iilf ~i! ~! s~ ~ci' ~~ a!1 ~d! ;Yt ~! 6 ,~~ t y:Y ~ ~_! ~' y =~.;s' E1= Y~= it ~ ~yy rr .$YS~ 9 y 1s~~} ~~~! E!~ li _I ~ ~i ~I ~I j`i;,1~ISt is =~! ~l- i!~~si£ P! _ ,_ _ ~! ~'~~1 i=.. ?lt3a! ~~l~ ! ~~i$ Y~J •~~ I!i •ll sa lr~s~ ~tY?~~ .i :3 s ~~ ;S~ s-!_=- ir~~~~ if?i~ Y'id"e 333_ ~:_~~ !- °7 .d ~: l~~~y3 i'ri €s ;~lr~ ¢ dlil 3=~~= ~(=i=sj fYt: iY ~ i ~I ~I X66 1~ a" M 0 al V v ~o a as:: ra s !a €= =il= as - N~ :s :isr !~ Y ~~ =i -f: ~E :. ~-~i 1ss f ~!- e= aea:;_~y;-n Y,1#ii;~~a~ #: wY3i.i~~~ sii"8c: r =~=-'Y - Sq~' ~ is ';~ =A L - b Y;<~ ib s~jir :i - -•~~ ~is !3 ~l~i i~ i ~~i~Yt xi! _~ iSa ~Vi= °~a .~ =e~ s ii# s- s; ~s-t. 3!~ 1J ~~~ d~! ~ ~~ °~ ~I sr: r }oas .a ~ 3 Sl ~ =: - ,s ~IZS ~; a- S ! i -3i5i i 31 3~ sP iljzs ! ~' :s1 ~ :~ {iii ~~ ~~ aa~ ski ~S s~ i - i:.e :i s!i ~i~ii = ~ ~~i= ~_ _' ~; !~~! rs ire x#~N s .<r :!s! !~ : ! ~~ 'r~s as :°~S =~ [~ r is ! ~ ._i!i ins is s~~ 3i ir'n sb - a ~; !:r- '= ii=a ; #3. zs_ -°. ii g13 #_ 3=ss s=Zir~ a~ ;i~ -s~ ;-ja s =} 3~~s z= is~3 dr•:-!s i~~ ~_ _ n:g fair -z ' i- ~" : i~•I;~ aiYS- ~Y?3 ° ;!~ ji *~: ~ ~i:l. r!~ei :°'i t--i=•! :sus i"sus i =.~c six a;, ~i iss~i i:l <?i1 c:ila~s ° a~? od i '~9 F'~s s1 .. ei3 g~j£F aa~y ks a. f~,j y~is .jc~ $ F 3€ -9i~ ~fe} _ is • ` _~a ~"~ _-s' -'° s~°~ ~Fiea iii s" SS :i' .s ..~_ ' ~ i~ sYj ~sE i~3~a i=" t-:= "s~~=_ =Yii1 s a ~i3= ci~ ~F~`! i~ ibis slFs~ ~qj~', d ~~ Si~~ z3"~ ;~:"j~s Fy- -3ai Y iii a_i. 3~~ ~~~~ ~ a- s ia? 3ii tt ,s ~I ~I 11 ~ ~ ~I ~I 11 ~ I ;;=s ~~ =s~ : as „ •:~ ,. x ~i~ -~Y _. i.. .~ ii- 3~3s g.. ~'s~ iii ~ ss•a :~ Asa ~ °Y .. :ge: ra ! ~s ~ '~1j F# aYl i ~F ~'ai c}= = ~ {!3 ~s~ a ~ sad c 3t, !irt 1 _~ ip ~ ~ ~f ~: i -Yd it i ~ ~Ss!_{i Za_xYx F'~~i St ~_ t~i ij~ 75F i' Fa ii SQL a=t[ ~.ia ' "a xFai ; i+f'F iF " i~ "! 3s f~-~ :~~~9 ~i ~ ~~~ ;is~ r iF~i! F~ ~i~i i'' ^x ~3i: ?~s!Y .~3. i:_ ~ ~ =. lIaF3 :ci ~~~ ii i~ s~-,'~f • ~I I ~ ~I ~ ~ I ~I ~I all ~I ~I ` aas ° N as: i a~sz ~ } i t gas; s M $ ri'd~: !=i 3 y raaz i • ~ ~aa Y}~ili hri ? ~ a 3 ~'Z~ _ k• i Yif~ _' ~' = 3i'~e Y °E a~sMi ,~- ~s a a a s is ~ - ~ i.n ~s =a~~ '~i~JC~! i~~~ s~ i i i i =: r 3j ij~ti 5r Is! 1s ~~ ~a ~: ys~l~ Fi ~ ~~i ~I -I ~I +I ~I is -! 3 ~I ~l i 3: _~ a E; YJ !J ~ijj i ;.i 23 S! ~: ;~ s1 s X~ Y; :_ ` ii as agi rs ~~ c,s~i ~~~ $-~. ~I ~I -I f a'~ S ~ i= ~ .. rill ]_: a'7 s= ~~ ; r t~ i€ ~a3i ~~i ~'?'s i ~ ;ast a;sa ~a~l~. _:~ ? ~ ~? ii y!i ?_!i c-!j9 z~s3 ss -: d i s="! .a ~ ti(io x at as s- 3s ii s €_:4s "i!s !°r:. ! ?~i~ !a zi ~# i 7 ~~s1 {iii ~s=1i• s_sa : sJa: .I a .l~ !~ a „ ~~~I ~ >I ~I ~I VI ~~s Ni x'Y -`~' tai s : a<:s: ? } s -:: _• _;-: _~ -= a 3: s n3 •~ } =3 x,n~iy ~ ~a s s =is €s }iu ~ sis ;dp i-3} - ~~ _~ l: . 3 j : ~;~a~ -~ is ,~ i -_. ~?' i ~,; .is33: ii ti3 =<a -~asa~a i a .e di i aiir : i f ~' ~ IE -sy ye h- ~~ :~ ,F ~? • s- : si ~ !! - 3. a i= l~ ~~ 1 :' _ ~~ ~ ,- ! •7 ~ ij I} i i as 5~' a'! i '3 3i 3r~ as ! '' }~Y ~~ ~S fit ~l . k =; .i ~ - :,; x; ~ 3 <i~ ~; ~3l ~~ ~ •I wl ^~I ~I 1i i :~ M~ ".•~ ~~ \ 1 ti~ '~ ~ 1 +~ ~3 3 fi ~ 2v _- i~.~. ~: ~, {~~ ~il~7 J! ~j }~: i~!3i =' 3- f-3 =i:£A -:~ c!~ ~~!-= L ~3~! }i' iii-S !~ 5 a~Y = •: 33•, =i~ +ia ~j~pe =~• pp = ~~3 ~'~ ~s3~s iN' i~lii ~a~ _~t i3c atd~3f .L? fit ~~ ,~ ~~ • a~~ •`~ i 0 v 0 d ~a ..ws a ! ~ i I I I dpi ~I 2 :br ' r ';f t -iy s = a s a s .- 3~y _ _~7~ s ~s 5 °s o=as Ia ;s_ _ = ~ ss_ }! ~s sr yy'y~P s~~ _ ~ = ~ Z ii: ;~i =i ii xSu3 ai=~ ~ ~~~ a ~. i =-- -- '- se i ~3.:r d ~3 = i3 :: a -~: ~'~€ ;. ~ iii? ~~Yi ,~~ ~~:~ s~ _; ai eF~~ spa sf ~! r}~~ xa~~ ~~ s~~~ 3~ a 3i ~~ a:i' is~ •a: ~~r a,e3 =:;a is 9zpsi ~a 1? !'~ xi~~ '9a ~~€ sc ?=i. i~- €s atl~ i~ ~~ 1t3~ s~:s :-~ ast ~i: ?z~a; :d~~ ~ E~3~ f~ - o~ ss a I ii !.z ac; o .2'7/ /90- .~ • RESOLUTION ND. 8 7 -~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Uf THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PUN AMENDMENT NO. 86-03D, AIEIIDIN6 THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMON6A GENERAL PLAN NNEREAS, the City Council has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all cawents on the proDOSed General Plan AnenM1sent 86-U3D; SECTION 1: The Rancho Cutaawnga City Council Hereby hakes the following T1'ndings: - A. The ANendaNlnt does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the 8eneral Dlan. B, The AMnO~ant proawtes goals of the Land Use EIeaN:nt. C. The A~endawtnt would not be agtertally 1n~ur/ous or detrtawmtal to the agiacent properties. SECTION 2: The General Plan Land Use~Nrp shall be aaronded as follows: . To change 66 acres of land on the southwest corner of the extensions of Nilson and Milliken tree Low-IAed1u~ Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units/acre) to low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units/acro 1. SECTION 3: A Nlgatwe uaciaraLiwi is r:by .'!^^t!~ based uoan the caDletion an3-f~di"ngs of the initial StuQy. NUN, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucauonga City Council Mes heresy approve General Plan Asrcndlent 86-03D. X71 ppDlNANCE NO• 9~0 CALIFORNIA. AN pRpiNANCE OF THE Ci7Y OF RANCHO CUCAN~`' ARp 17 • S PARCE THE ~~RNEST 1 CORNER LM (y.6 RE10NiN6 ~ ~ RES ~MtLLtKEN FROM FCUNj~S~ACRE1. LOCATFA ~ NSLSON AMO.L, (2-4 ONELLIN6 ExTENSIONS ~ REI TO pNELLIM6 UNITS/1t •on9a California, does Tha Gity Coundl of the City of Rancho Cuca ~ Gity Council hereby finds a~ detenalnes the ordain as follows: faltowin ACT ~ t^a Plfoilogwin9~isW~pyf he~ ^9~~nAS~theiMid Guupnga. ~. Prescribed described• rice and ego" property here/nabl>'~ hearin~a d and rezoning of t~{1 has held a W and duly t1~ Cit,Y COQ resc~datlon.~ and ~^^~ P the ~nerai constdtred said rec 6 That this rezoning is consiste^t '~~ Plan of the City of Rancho Gucaeanga• here no slgnffianE envlrorwentat G. This re>Antn9 w'l' in the ,K;r`1Ve pedaratlon fired . {agact as provided rezonaC herein. real properLY is hereby following described ^ded accord1n91Y• SECTION 2: d, and the zoning sap is heroby ace t pistrtct MaD for ~' acres oa the in the xwnne""~~ DeveloP~^ diu1N~^ ity Arend the of the exte^sians~rof N/~ ~ dwellin9dunits/acre) to .L. iLOw fraa~ C"clFlood Control) rel. Residential - 2-4 dwallin9 unitslac Residential •-8 Oensi tY __ r.' •2. ~~. h ~: ~ .. .~ ''F} sJ~ u ,~. • ~~3 0 <~ X, G ti • ORDINANCE N0. 3/0 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM011611, CALIFORNIA, RE20NIN6 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 201-191-11, AND 17 LOCATED ON 66 ACRES ON THE SOUTHNESf CORNER OF THE EXTENSIONS OF NILSON AND MI LLIKEN FROM "FG" AMD "LM" 14-8 DNELLING UNITS/ACRE) TO 'L" (2-4 ONELLIN6 UNITS/ACRE). Tne City Council of the City of Ranchc Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and detenaines the following: A. That the Planning Cawrission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the tiawt and nannar prescribed by law, recasends the rczoning of tM yroperty hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the tliae end aNlnnar prescribed by law and duly heard and considered sate recaaawrdatlon. B. That CMs rezoning is consistent w1N the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cuca~enga. • C. This rczoning will have no signiflwnt envlronaw:ntal lepact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The following described real vroperty is hereby rezoned to the awnner stated, and the zoning leap is hereby aawended accordingly. Aaw:nd the DevelOpawmt District Map for 66 acres on the southwest corner of the extensions of Ntison and Milliken frc~ "f C' (Flood Control) and "LM' (Law-Mediia Density Residential - 4-8 dwelling units/acre) to 'L' (Low Density Residential - 2-4 dwelling units/acre 1. ~ 73 CITY OF RANCHO CGCAMONGA STAFF REPORT C~ GATE: April 15, 1981 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer L~ U ~ih ~ Y F~ Z _ ~ ie-- I SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87-02A - reques seen rcu a on amen a e enera tan for the purpose of accomplishing the following changes: 1. The extension of Hilton Avenue, fraa Carnelian Street to Archibald Avenue, which includes existing roadway between Archibald and Amethyst, and 1/4 mile east of Carnelian and Carnal/an. 2. The deletion of Banyan Strcet from approximately 3700 fcet east of Haven Avenue to Nilson Avenue and the extension of Banyan Strcet from approximately 3700 feet east of Haven Avenue to the intersection of Ettwanda Avenue and Sueaeft Avenue. . 3. The extension of Milson Avenue frw approximately i 400 feet east of Canistel Avenue to the east. 4. The extension of Rochester Avenue from Highland Avenuo }n myth nP n ...,..e e.-...- ~': vi('. . ~~n~r.... ru,, un - Yc. 5. The deletion of Milliken Avenue from approximately 1500 fcet south of N11son Avenue to N11son Avenue along Its arved alignment and the extension of M1111ken Avenue from 1500 feet south of Nilson Avenue to north of Nilson Avenue. 6. The addition of an unnamed major arterial from 24th Street to the north and De1ng approximately 1000 feet west of and parallel to Etiwanda Avenue; and, the extension of East Avenue north of 24th Street. RECOMMENDATION: It 1s recommended that the City Council receive public npu regar ng this proposal and, if deemed appropriate, adopt the attached Resolution providing for the approval of General Plan Amendment 87-02A BACKBROIMD: These changes and additions to the Circulation Element are prapos o complete the City's circulation systee and to provide access to areas in its sphere of influence. The amendments are described 1n mare detail below. .27Y LITr COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: GPA 87-02A April 15, 1987 Page 2 • 1. NILSBN AVENUE FROM CARNELIAN STREET TO ARCHIBALO AVENUE - Nilsen venue currm y ex s s as a secon rya era ran arne tan Street to 1/4 Bile east as a coepleted section and frog Aeethyst Avenue to M1111ken Avenue as a largely undeveloped roadway planned for taiprovenent to secmdary standards. Nhile its taraHnus at Archibald Avenue, as currently shown, would provide a valuable alternate v1a Haven and M111iken to Archibald Avenue, further westerly extmsim would greatly i~rease its service to the City. Between the west City Melts and ArcMDald, only Carnelian Street will provide significant capadty for traffic bound south to get to east-west arterials. Beryl, Hellean and Anethyst Mve all deveioiled with cony lots frenttng the which causes friction with the "collector' character of the traffic using thee now and in the future. Continuing the developeeM of N11son Avenue as an east-west arterial free Aeethyst west to Carnelian will relieve the scalier north-south collectors of each of the increased traffic 1n the future. Otverslon of traffic ta N11son free Nilislde and Banyan w111 also relieve stellar conflicts along those streets. The allgneent of this extension 1s across undeveloped property except for a house at its connectlen witA Aeethyst Avenue. the allgneent was part of the county raster plan of streets and one right-of-way offer exists teeedtataly west of the house, en a separate parcel. The existence of one house on the altgneent 1s not teen as a serious obstacle since Lhe ultteata connectim w111 be easy years away. It should be noted, however. tMt thic Muc. hoe h..,, ..~.,,.e..i,. renovated and has Deen subeitted as a candidate for designation as a City Historic Landeark. It is on a 0.6 acre lot with an unteproved street frontage. 2. BANVAN STREET - The Banyan Street extmslen will provide an n arse a routa across the C1ty between Nilson Avenue and Route 30 (now 19th Street -Highland Avenue; future freeway). The proposed aligneent carries the street along a route wh1cA includes the portion being Dutlt now as a part of the Caryn Planned CoeeiMty and ,{airs existing Suit Avenue in Etlwanda. 3. NILSON AVENUE EAST OF CANISTEL AVENUE - Th1s extlnslen of Nilson venue eas o en venue prov des a circulation 11nk for possible future developemt, as well as a continuation of a cross- c14y arterial route, if needed. 4. ROCHESTER AVENUE -Rochester Avenue is Included 1n the Caryn Planned ocean y an s ould extend north of Banyan, should that area be developed. • ~ 7 ~' CITY CODICIL STAFF REPORT RE: GPA 87-02A April 15, 1987 Page 3 • 5. MILLIKEN AVENUE -The curved alignment for M1111ken Avenue which is s en existing General Plan was developed prior to the lmproveaxnts on Deer Creek and planned improveaxents on Day Creek to control flooding Tn that area. At that Nme, the entire area east of Deer Creek was contsplated to remain undeveloped indefinitely or be used as a rcgionst park or undeveloped recreational area needing minlaw.l access. It appears now that a conventional intersection between M1111km and Nilson Avenues, with the potential For eztensiens of the streets, will better serve the expected circulation needs. 6. ETIIIANDA AVENUE -Future development of the sphere of influence in wan require the extensien of East Avenue north of 24th Street and an additional arterial Lo the west. This westerly arterial 1s proposed to be offset from Etiwanda Avenue to discourage the use of EtlwaMa Avenue as a route through the caawunl b and divert spMrc traffic to Day Creek Boulevard. Addition of this arterial and the extension of East Avenue sill corplete this circulation goal begun 1n the Etlwanda Specific Plan. EM/IRONMEJITlL ASSE59EMT: Staff nos completed an Environmental Assessment of propos mac and has detenained that there will De Ia significant enrironrental Impscts. Part I of the InitialStudy is attached for your review. • Res ~ubmitted, `i;~~s6 RI~R!P~o Attachments ~ 7~ 0 a e 0 r 3 a77 ~ ~ .~~d i~~4~~u~V X93 • RESOLUTION N0. P ~ -e~-' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON611, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 87-02A AMENDING THE CIRCUUITION ELEMENT aF THE RANCHO CUCAMON61l GENERAL PLAN NHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all caawents an the proposed General Plan Amendment 87-02A; SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council hereby hakes the following -f{ nd~gs: A. The Amendaent does not conflict with the CTrculation Policies of the General Plan. D. The AmmdmenL promotes goals of the Circulatlan Element. C. The Aamndment would not be materially tniurious or detrimental to aQlacmt properties. SECTION 2: The General Plan Circulation Map shall be amended to • show new an~rovTsed streets as follows: 1. The extension of Nilson Avaue, from Carnelian Street to Archibald Avenue, which inciudes existing roadway between Archibald and Amethyst, and 1/~ mile east of Carnelian and Carnelian. 2. the deletion of Banyan Street from approximately 3700 feet east of Haven Avenue to Nilson Avenue and the extension of Banyan Street from approximately 3700 feet east of Haven Avenue to the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Su~1t Avenue. 3. The extension of Nilson Avenue from approximately 400 feet east of Canlstel Avenue to the east. 4. The extensfon of Rochester Avenue from Highland Avenue to north of proposed Banyan Avenue. 5. The deletion of M111fken Avenue from approximately 1500 feet south of Nilson Avenue to Nilson Avenue almg its curved alignment and L11e extensfon of Milliken Avenue from 1500 feet south of Nilson Avenue to north of Nilson Avenue. EJ a7P CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. RE: GPA 87-02A April 15, 1987 Page 2 • 6. The addition of an unnaaaW armor arterial fra~a 2~th Street to the north and being approztabtely 300D feet west of and parallel to Etlwanda Avenue; and. •the extension of East Avenue north of 2~th Street. SECTIdI 3: A Negative Declaration is hereby adopttd based upon the ca~pletton an n nys of the Initial SWdy. NDN, TIEREiORE, BE IT RESDlYEO, tMt the Rancho Cucaaxxtga City Council does hereby approve General Plan Mendeent 87-O7J1. l__I • ~ 79 n,mv no n ~ wrn vn rn rn ~ ,.rnvn STAFF REPORT GATE: April 15, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide .'ir Lew... ~'r j ;;> 4 T v H~ ~ Z ~. '> i9-- SUBJECT: OROERIN6 THE IpRK IN CONNECTIQI WITH ANNEXATIQi N0. 20 FOR TMCT NOS. 12650-2, 12772 AND 13192 (VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE CITY) TO STREET LIGHTING MA INiENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 RECOMIEND!1TI071: tt is recomiaended that Ctty Council approve the attaMed resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 20 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROLND/ANALYSIS • Attached far City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 20 to Street U 9hting Maintenance District No. 1 for Tract Nos. 12650-2, 12772 and 13192. The developers of the sub0ect tracts have been notified of the public hearing by mall. The attached resolution also approves the tentatively approved Engineer's Report by Resolution No. 87-128. Respe f sudnttted, RHM: AttacMnents arm • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. Annexation No. 20 for Tracts 12650-Z, 12772 and 13192 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compitance with 1, Division 15 of the Streets and (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). the requirements of Article 4, Chapter Highways Code, State of Cal ifornta SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex the tracts enumerated in Exhibit "A" into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Couneil has determined that the street lights to be maintained will bare an effect upon all lots within said tracts x. :11 a; on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Mark to he provided for with the assessments established by the district are: ~`?`.a 'rurnishing of services and materials far the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on arterial and certain collector streets. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot basis. In the case Of condominiums with airs Dace ownership only. and xnarfi..nte, _ -"-::cll!;g w.it ;kuii oe considered to benefit the sane as a lot. SECTION 3. Rlans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval For the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the sub,?ect tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the sane extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the 111uminatton of the subject area. ~di SECTION 4. Estimated Costs Na costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements wfll be constructed by developers. Based ort available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 427c(9500L streetilights) andcl4p(27e500L ITghts)uisishown be1~5800L lights), 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lamps Lanps Lang Size* YTD Annexed Rate 5800E 341 51 (8.93 9500E 425 2 f10.16 27,500E 14 0 f15.31 *Migh Dressure Sodium Vapor Lamps Rate Mo's Total 392 X S 8.93 X 12 = S42 006.72 427 X 510.16 X 12 = (52,059.84 14 X 515.31 X 12 f 2,572.08 f96, 638.64 2. Costs per dwelling Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost = f96 638.64 = (1.64 /year/unit No. a n s n s r ct ZZ;353-- f7.64 divided by 12 • f .64 /mo./unit Assessment shall apply tg each lot as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street lighting Maintenance District No. 1°, Annexatfon No. 20. These diagrans are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Where there is more than one dwe111ng unit per got 'or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each iot or parcel shall be Droportfonal to the number of dwelling units per lot ar parcel. tt is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the District. • • dP1 SECTIO71 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Prelimfnary Approvai of City Engineer s Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a OTstrid and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the Cfty Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Councii conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. • X83 EXHIBIT "A" Properties and in~proven~ents to be included within Annexation No. 20 to Street • Lighting Maintenance District is Arterial PROJECT D/U 5800E 95 ci, ~ 12650-2 19 21 12772 42 11 13192 62 13 2 51 2 L_J aav i • ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION No. 2 ~ ~--~- T Ai 'c,~s.Sd:(v. CITY 08 RANCHO CUCA1[ONOA ~ rRacr iz5so-z ';:' ~ COUNTY OF BAPT BSSNA8DIN0 Y, `-~" ,i srATB OF CALIIrORNiA ~ T ass wN~~i~• 1N~~1' ~ ~M'~oN 1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION N0. z 0 b>'~~~~''+^ C'~ OF RANCBG CUCA1[ON(iA w raacr iznz ._,;,~ ~ COUNTY OP 8AN B31tNARDINO / ` ~__. `~'~ ~ BTATS OF CALII-ORNIA ~~ - N aP6 r~frSE LINE • ti J W t., W j R if z j~ i__ p~ u __ y ~~~~.w C1TY OF RANCHO CUCAIION(iA ~ ianci tgt92 . _~ ~ COiJNTY OF 8AN BSBNASDINO >' `~' ,3 8TA'1'$ OP CALIFORNU N Lii > ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION NO. 10 i -- av~ Pf}SE LINE ~ G ~"+D i9`>` #!g Ri:saurlan no. 87-~ • A RESq.UTiON OF THE CITY COLNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGq ORDERING 7HE WORK IN CONNECT[pi WITH ANNEXATION N0. 20 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. L AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TPACT NOS. 12650-2, 12772 AND 13192 WHEAEAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 18th day of Narch, 1987, adopt its Resolution of Intention No, 81-129 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 20 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, wMch Resolution of Intention No. 87-129 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office Of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the pass; of said Resolution of Intention, headed `Notice of Improvement^, w;; auly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location; anC nunber as required by taw, as appears from the Affidavit 4f "c;ting said notices, on 9fie in Che off+~~ ~;; the Cify r,'?5;~ d;iu WHEREAS, after the adoption th:reor, no;JceS of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention ~:rc d• ;,ofied to all persons owning real property oronn:ed to ;•e as:eosed r'or the -improvements described in said Resolution of ~,icentlon No. 87-129, according to the naves and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the Gity of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City r..,_rcil `:.~;uy uuiy received considered evidence, oral m,u documentary, concerning the Jurisdiction facts fn this proceeding and concerning the necessity far the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired Jurisdiction to order the proposed work, SECTIQ/ 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 81-129, De done and made; and SECTIQV 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; an SECTIQi 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the En3lneer's epor are hereby approved. SECTIO!1 4: the assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said trot s eve been occupied. d, g & • --•- vvravawn STAFF REPORT ~~'` DATE: APril 15, 1987 ~~ ~i i0: City Council and City Manager iy__ FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE NORK IN CGNNECTi2! i:J*,'s, AMNEXATI01 N0. 32 FOR TPACT NOS. 12fi50-2 AND !;:%t ~'rARIOUS LOGITIONS THROUGHOUT THE CITY) TO LAwrx,;,tas ;.h1NTEtNNCE DISTRICT N0. 1 REOnr.,s!M~tts% • It 1s recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 32 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND/AINLYSIS Attached for City Coundl approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 32 to landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Tract Nos. 12650-2 and 12772. The Developers of the subject tracts have been notified of the publ7c hearing Dy mail. The attached resolution also approves the tentatively approved Engineer's Report by Resolution No. 81-136. Resper ~ sudnitted, i ~~ RHM:JAA:y~rr Attachments ass CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMpIGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 ANNE7WTICN M0. 32 for Tracts 12650-2 and 12772 • SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with 1, Division 15 of the Streets and (Landscaping and Lighting qct of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description the requirements of Article 4, Chapter Highways Code, State of California This City Council has elected to annex all new subdivisions Into Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determiced that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon alt lots within Tracts 12650-2 and 12772 as well as on the lots dtrectiy abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right-of-way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTIOI 3. Plans and Sceciftcattons The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditfons of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference 1s hereby made to the suDJett tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaced areas. The olanc ana specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the sane extent as if said plans and speciffcations were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for parkway Improvement wnstructfon. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based an historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (5.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, including Annexation No. 32, is as follows: ego Total Annual Maintenance Cost YTD f.30 X 736,111 square feet f220,833.30 • Per Lot Annual Assessment f220833.30_ = f 26.66 Per Lot Monthly Assessment f2~~ " f 2.22 Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated fn Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. Mhere the development covered by this annexation involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced. SECiIgi 5. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A", by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECiIpI 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all • lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit . Mhere there is more than one dwelling unit per tot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall he proportional to the MmMr rrf Au=llinn ..M t' ~ lct ~- _ .._ .... pc.~ ~. ydi Cci. The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual vests Incurred by the City during the previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. Cfty Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, west ders all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the Lity Council conducts a pu„11c hearing and approves, or medifies and approves the individual assessments. • d9/ Properties and faproveamts to he included within Annexation No. 32 to • Landscape MalMenance District No. 1: MAINTAINED AREA TRACT D/U _ 12650-2 21 (42G 5) 0 0 12772 ~7~ Turner Avenue ~ ~~ • ~R1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM . LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. Z ANNEXATION N0 3 Z . , 1 wkntll SMlll' 1 wNiaN I i ' `~ • ; ~ ~~~ .. '~ktyD Y 1 . t T.• 4r~~t • [~ -~ VyM /v0Y1liY film ~ [ i ~ _ ~ !{y~l~ 1 Illlpl LIrK ~~{• la lw.w 1 uK~K! -. 1lN.~y ~ uN~~p r ~~ /I 1. I ~~ r~~ • ~ a ~ 1!!N! r ~ ~ A•r ~ ~ f ~~~.~ ~ i~ i I ? ~ I ~ 3j `~ ~ I ~~ I _ _ ~,•~""~ \~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAutiIOIYCA .~ ~~ /~ '- ~s ENGINEERING DIVISION ~ .~' ~> VICINITY MAP N Im ~,$3 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION N0.3,Z tr`'~'~~' ~. CITY OF RANCHO CUGu~IOIYGA /` TRACT 12772 '~ ~ ~C ~i F "" j3 E~` NC LAITY MAPISION ~ T . ~ 9'1 ,y r RESq.UTIOI N0. ~'7-~~' • A RESOLUTI01 OF THE CITY COLNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON64 ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTIOI WITH ANNEKATIOY N0. 32 TO LANDSCAPE NA INTENAN CE DISTRICT N0. 1 ANO ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 12650-2 AND 12772 MHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 18th day of March 1987 adopt its Resolution of Intention Na. 81-137 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 32 to landscape Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 87-137 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and MHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and NHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of • Intention No. 87-137, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the sane appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on fife in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the 3urisdiction facts fn this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having maw acquired 3urisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTIQI 1: It fs hereby resolved by the City Council of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and Lhe ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87-137, he done and made; and SECTION 2: Be ft further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer s;- e~~y finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it further resolved that the assessments and method of assessment in t e ngineer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4; Be it finally resolved that said assessments shall not begin unt a er 0 percent of said tracts have keen occup`ed. r a9r STAFF REPORT ~n ~t~~`~°°~'`' -I~'~ ~. t. ~~` DOTE: April 15, 1987 } F T0: City Council and City Manager 19C- FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 8Y: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE NORK IN CONNEGTIQV ItITH ANNEKATIOA ND. 15 FOR TRACT NOS. 1265D-2 AND 12772 (VARIOUS LOCATIONS iHR000H0U7 THE CITY) TO STREET LIGHTIH6 MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2 RECOP)ENDATION: it is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in conra•ttion with Annexation No. 15 to Street Lighting Maintenance District Ho. 2 and approving the Engineers Report. BACKGROUID/ANALYSIS C~ Attached for C1ty Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 15 to Street Lighting Maintenance 0f strict No. 2 for Tract Nos. 122650-2 and 12772. The developers of the subJect tracts have been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the tentatively approved Engineers Report by Resolution No. 8T-130.. Respectf ly sudnitted, . ~~ RHM:JAA~ Attachments ~4L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 Annexation No. 15 for Tracts 12650-2 and 12772 S£CTlON 1. Authority for Report This report is in campiiance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lfghtf ng Act Of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex the tracts enumerated in Exhibft "A" into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon alt lots within said tracts as well as on the lots directly abutting the street tights. Mork to bt provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on arterial and certain collector streets. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas fn the Oistrtct and cost shall be divided on a per lot basis. In the case of condoms ni~ms with airspace ownership only, and apartment., t~eiiing unit shall be considered to benrf{t t"c sane as a lot. SECTION 3. Plans and Sceciftcations The plans and specifications for street iighting have been prepared by the developers, The plans and street lights are as stipulated fn the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the sub}ect tram map or development plan and the assessment diagram for t4c a,"~i location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on [he individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district Include: the repair, removal or replacement of alt or any part of any improvement, providing for the f)lunination of the subiect area. a9~ SECTION 4. Estimated Costs • No casts will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvenents will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will he based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (including Annexation No. 15 comprised of 3938 units and 1043 (SBOOL lights), 0 (9500L street iights) is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lapps Lapps Lam Size* VTD Annexed Rate SBOOL 1005 38 58.93 9500E 0 0 f10.16 *HigA Pressure Sodium Vapor Lapps Rate Mo's Total 1043 X 5 8.93 X 12 - 5111,761,88 • 0 X 510.16 X 12 0 f111,767.88 2. ~J; t; yc, u.eiiiny iini c: Total Annual Maintenance Cost 5111 167.88 = (28.38/year/unit No. o Un is in istrict x`938- 528.38 divided by 12 • 52.31/mo./unit Assessment shall apply to each lot as explained in Section 6, SLGiIUI 5, Assessment Ota~ Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrans are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2", Annexation No. 15. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6, assessment Improvements far the District are found to be of general benefit to all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Nhere there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or Darcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shale be proportional • to the nunber of dwelling units per lot or parcel. It is proposed that all future development shaii he annexed to the fistrict. ~5P SECTI01 7. Order of Events • 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2, City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a Otstrict and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public Hearing, Considers all testimony and determines to form a pistrict or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year 1n June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. r1 LJ X99 EXMI6IT "A" Properties and improvments to be included within Annexation Mo. 15 to Street • Lighting Maintenance District Ho. 2: PROJECT D/U 5800L Tract 12650-2 42 27 Tract 12772 47 11 8+l ~ `. J Sop ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.2 ANNEXATION NO. IS ~ wef ~~xaa xnaa+ ~ uYOar •~ 1, i i .~ ' ~T~. " "i * ~xfx'ei q , 1-, 4A __ , graoau a•aaii ~~< ~ -:.~ ~• ~ 'wrmn aar u ~ y_ ~ Ifll xaalT IYN~ ) 11L ~WaW JJ ~ waV~iara :aa~~~ ~ ~wv~„u i 1 i~ ~ 1~Iu'9!i ~ ~ IlfNf .~ ~ a~ a a. ~ ~ ~ f ~ - ~ ~ y - i-.~ ------- i .._~-- ~ i ~ ~_ I _ , _ -- - eaao °. -" a yr ~~ws ~.?%'~•~,^ CITY OP RANCHO C[1CA1[ONGA . • ~:~\~ COZTNTY OF 8AN BRRNARDINO ~ 4~' `~" ~ srATR OF CALIII'ORNIA - N ~~, 3oi Tana tzbSO-z ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION NO. I S ~,mi~. CITY OH RANCHO CUCAI[ONOA .~,,,~ ~ COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO ~~ "~" ~~ BTATS OF CALII~OANIA im ~~ ~ +~ - N 3 0 ~. TRACT 1 ryL RESOLUTION N0. ~7-/~" • A RESOLUfIQI OF 7HE CITY COLNCiL OF THE C[TY OF PANCHO CUCAMON CA ORDERING THE MORK [N LONNECTICN MITH ANNE%ATIO'i N0. 15 TO STREET LIGHTING MIINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2 ANO ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRALT NOS. 12650-2 AND 12772 MHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga tlid on the 18th day of March, 1987, adopt its Resolution of Intentton No. 87-135 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 15 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2, which Resolution of Intention Mo. 87-135 was duly and legally published in the Lime, form and manner as required by law, shorn by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intentton on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, rgtice of the passage of said Resolution of intention, headed "Notice of Improvement", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and nunber a4 required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in Lhe office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, ratites of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property • proposed to be assessed far the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87-135, according to the nacres and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last matlfng or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mafling on file in the office of the City Clerk; and MHEREAS, said City Coundl having duly received cansfdered evraence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to he derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired ~urisdictton to order the proposed work. SECTIQI 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intentton No. 87-135, be done and made; and SECTIQi 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; an3-- SECTIQV 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer`s epor are hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tracts rave been occupied. 303 T2111 • 111.i i/1 /~ • STAFF REPORT ~ ~~ p~ ~;~~ DATE: APril 15, 1981 ~, T0: City Council and City Manager Fi~' ~+ iycr FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: OROERIN6 THE VKIRK IM CONNECTI01 KITH RNNEXATIOY N0. 5 FOR TRACT N0. 13192 (TERRA VISTA) TO LANDSCAPE MI INTENAN CE DISTRICT N0. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 RECOMMEN01TIOl: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolutions ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 5 to landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 and approving the Engineer's Reports. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS • Attached for City Council approval are resolutions ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 5 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Matntmmce Distrit No. 4 for Tract No. 13192. Lewis Names, developer of the sub3ect tract, has Gem notified of the public hearing by mail The attached resolutions also approve the tentatively approved Engineer's Reports by Resolution Nos. 87-130 and 87-132. Kespectr'uliy submitted, e RNM: Attachments ,~o y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG4 Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 ANNE1(ATIQI N0. 5 for Tracts 13192 (Terra Yista Planned Community SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is Tn compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (landscaping and Lighting Act of 1912), SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new subdivisions Tnto Landscape Maintenance District No. 4. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract 13192 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in Lhe annexed tracts are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right-of-way or easeaents to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucanonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications . The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as aDProved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the Landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this re DOrt to the same PYI POI ae if ~~?~ Ml ~,-,~ u~-~U specs( icac ions were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs wiil be incurred for parkway improvement construction. A11 improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (f.30) cents Der square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based an actual cost data. The estimated total cost for landscape Maintenance District No. 4 is as follows: Existing Annex New District No_4 Total total estimated annual (196,546.80 f913.50 (197,460.30 maintenance cost Assessment units 1,578 62 1,640 Total costs assessment unit for year and month f19~7 4t~6.3~0 ~ 5120.40 r 12 510.03/mo. ,~O i attached assessment dtagrpaei. t Where thetdevelopnentacovered by this annexation • involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagran is attached to this report and labeled Exhibit A by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment Par each lot or Darcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot ~ parcel. The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, to determdne the actual assessments based upon the actual vests incurred by the City during the previous fiscal year which are to De recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTIp1 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of Ctty Engineer's • Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to Distrito and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public Nearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year to June, the City Council conducts a public Nearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. L J Sot • Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 5 to Landscape Mairdenance District No. 4: MAINTAINED AREA TRACT L Sq~Ft• ~- 13192 62 Terra Vista Pwky 1,210 1,775 • 307 • ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. ~} ANNEXATION N0.5 • .. „. ~~ ~ -~ ~ _ ~ .- ~` f .. t _ .,,. '' p 9 ~. • i I • ~ I :I I~ ~~ J •~ _ _ ` I e i z ~ . ~'- ~--T ~-z NIIYMY ~ ~ ~f .s``~~~~: CITY Of RANCHO Cl1CA,VIONCq r_.7. ~y A ~w ~~~ r ~~ ~~ ~'`4~i'' {? ENGINEERING DIVISION `'~-~f VICINITY MAP ,30 ? TkACT N0. t; !9~ RESOLUTION N0. g ~ ~~G A RESOLUTICN OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY aF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE HORK IN CONNECTION KITH ANNEXATION N0. 5 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT M0. 4 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT N0. 13192 HHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the ISth day of March, 1987, adopt fts Resolution of intention No. 67-131 to order the therein described work to connection with gnnexatlon ho. 5 to landscape Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 67-131 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publicatfon of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and HHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement^, was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Pasting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and HHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices oP the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to ail persons awning real property proposed to be assessed far the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention Mo. 67-131 according to the names and addresses of such owners as • the sane appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duty mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit Of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and '~ricnEhS, Baia C,ty Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the~3urisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrmn and said City Council having now acquired 3urisdictfon to order the proposed work. SECTIQi 1: It fs hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87-131, be done and made; and SECTIQI 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed Dy the Engineer sT- eTi rTfinally approved; and SECTICH 3: Be it further resolved that the assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: Be 1t finally resolved that said assessments shall not begin until afEer~i0 percent of said tracts have been occuoied. I ,po9 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 Annexation No. 5 for Tract 13192 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requf rements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Di of Sion 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex the tracts enumerated in Exhibit "A" into Street Light ing Maintenance District No. 4. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all Lots within said tracts as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established Dy the dfstritt are: The furnishing of services and maters als for the ordinary and usual maintenance, oDerating and servicing of street light improvements on arterial and certain collector streets. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas 1n the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot basis. In the case of condominiums with airspace owners hio nnly ann aoa.~meM. ,,..,.,,:__ .. -, - -••.~~...y ..r~it Shun 6e considered to benefit the same as a lot. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared Dy the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated 1n the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development Dl an and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas, The plans and specifitations for street lighting improvement on the individual development T5 hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include; the repair, reiroval or replacement of alt or any part of any improvement, providing for the illuninatton of the subject area. SE CTI DN 4. Estimated Costs ,~ No costs will be Incurred for street lighting tmprovemer` construction. All improvements will be constructed 6y develoDers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. ?/ o The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 . (including Annexation No. 5 comprised of 988 units and 151 (5800L lights) and 24 (9500L street lights) is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: LaaPS LanPS Lamp Size+ YTD Annexed Rate 5800E 144 13 38.93 9500E 22 2 f10.16 "High Pressure Sodium Vapor LamPS Rate Mo's Total 157 X f 8.93 X 12 - (16,824.12 24 X 310.16 X 12 • 3 2,926.08 f19,750.20 2. Costs per dwelling Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost - f19_ 7~0• f19.99/year/unit o. o n s n s r c 319.99 divided by 12 • 51.67/mo./unit Assessment shall apply to each lot as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagran Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4•, Annexation No. 5. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the tent of this report, SECTION 6. Assessment Improvdnents for the District are found to be of genera) benefit tc all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be eQual for each unit. Nhere there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. it is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the District. • • 3// SECTION 7. Order of Events • 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of Lity Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines Lo form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report witA the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the Individual assessments. • 3/1 EXHIBIT "q" Properties and Tmprovements to be included within Annexation No. 5 to Street • Lighting Maintenance District 4: PROJECT Tract 13192 D/U 5800E 62 13 Arterial ~L u • 3/~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.4 ANNE7(ATION NO. 5 Unl~ ,po~Fb u . • a ti . ~ ~ ~ FI i~ tiwsw riwrw ~ ~ ~ r--~a~e.~. wwwwrv MI _ (~ Di ; u ~Tr~~~ • ~ `~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI[ONGA ,. . ' '~'~~ ;~ COUNPY OF 8AN BSBPiARDINO ",~ ti -`~' ~ sTATB OF CALII+ORNIA - N ~. ,m 3iY raacr N0. 13~9z 198 awl RESOLUTION N0. I17 ~~ • A RESOLUTIO1 OF Tiff CITY COINCIL OF TIE CITY OF PANCNO CUCAMONGA ORDERING TIE NORK IN CONNECTI01 NITN RNNEXATICN N0. 5 TO STREET LIGHTING MIINTENAN CE DISTRICT N0. 0 AND ACCEPTING TIE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT N0. 13192 NNEREAS, the Cfty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 18th day of March 1987, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 81-133 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 5 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 81-133 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required 6y law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in Lhe office of the City Clerk; and NHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolutton of Intentton, headed "Nan ce of Improvement", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and NHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intentton were duly mailed to all persons awnfng real property proposed to 6e assessed for the Improvements described in said Resolutton of • Intentton No. 87-133, according to the names and addresses of such owner as the sane appears an the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, whteh said copies were duly mailed 1n the time, form, and manner as required by lar, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and NNEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the Jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council havtng now acquired Jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: [t is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the arderiny of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87-133, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer Ss hereby finally approved; a~- SECTICN 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engfneer's eport are hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 50 percent of said trac~rfave been occupied. 3/~ • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~ C~G•Nn cv ~ yi~ ~;i ;: F", $ Z 1977 ~ DATE: April 15, 1987 TO: Mayor end Members of the City Council FRgN: Jerry Grant, Building Official SUBJECT: Update of Building Regulations i. RECOhMEtIDATION: [t is recommended that the City Council hold a irat reeding of the accompanying ordinance and set the date of May 20th for public hearing on the matter. fI. ANALY9I9: The Government Code sets specific procedures for adoption of codes Dy reference,(es is intended Dy the accompanying ordinance). This procedure is somewhat different tAen other or dinancea. To assure compliance witA all of not[flcetion requirements o[ state law it la necessary that the Ctty Council place the attached or dinence on ti rat r. •nl~e ...n ...b~....._-•. ~y........~ o date [or hearing. The date of May 20th for a hearing will allow time for proper publication. Re./s(,p~%e//c//t//f/ully submitted, J~;e~~G~y R. Gran/~ . 9uilding Official JRG:tI Attachment: Adoption Ordinance 3/~ AfFIDA VIT OF Pl)NtICAT10N STATR OF CAIdFO1tMA s.v ~INTYOF SAN NFftNAHD(NO I, Neurtne D. -eean , do M;nhy r•crtify that I am Mlc IAT(al AdvertiainR clerk of 77tF. DAILY Rf:l'1lItT, a daily newspaper of µ~lleral circulation, publishtd in the (;ily of Ontario, L'ralnty and Slak aforcwrid and that the alWchlsl advcrtiwsnent tL CnMt SlM • /IIt1,. of Notice Ot Fublle Ne^rin! ns.,,,.ln To .rwe ~ Ilst: MV 1lnilmp FuW,W C1lY Ce unell __._ __-. ~ cr, NY /Nriw. me.m_ ~I Citr sf Ranr~~ CuCa/lanwe _._____ _ .._ waa published in said newspaper _ Dnt _ (~.. .flat Wwit: Arril 3. 1907 I certity under penalty at penury Mot the toregoing is true and I ~T r ~,,,,,~~`,;,,~ m. an cr, ro w o. . UUU ISi naturel i AVTM/l/T M104M AMrIA NV g ,o<m~, l~ted at Ontario, California ttua ..._ ._ DMA . day of Arril 19 87 3/7 • olifllNAt~CE ND. 3N AN f7DINANI£ OP Tf1E CITY CAQ~CIL 0!' TFIli CITY OP RAt43p Ci[N;LK'~t, REPEALikl; CHAPiH6 15.04, 15.08, 15.12, 15.18, 15.20, 15.24 AND 15.28 QP TI17,E 1S, Wi1LDi8 AED O78'1RUCTIQi, QF 11E RAK}D QI'NYLlGA M[N[CIPAL O1DE IN TFElll ENFIAEIY, AND 9H;1'IQS 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, AND 10 OP 7IE SAN BFldiymlW O71N1Y C~ ADOPIFD BY OIDINAti:E 1T; AED AD7TING BY RBPHt@LE THE "INIli7lM AON[NIS'iRATlYE QT8^, 1983 IDITIDi; 11$ AiIA7M BUILDII4; Cmi, 1985 ®ITIQi INCLIDING AIL APP@DICES 1FEBLr1O; 7fE "INI1tIM BU11DR4G 0778 STANlYtlmB^, 1885 IDIT1Qi; TFE "ONI1Qlt h87I!lNICAL 078", 1985 IDIT[Q4, IELII.DINO ALL APP!>tDICEB TEEBL+1O; THE "lIN[1LZIH PLIDEING C3~E", 1995 EDtTIQ4 INC;[DDG AIL APP@DIC®; 118 NATIONAL H.$1RICAL Q7E, 1987 ID[TEQ4; 1I6 "[I4IIKHi 038 ItR TiE ABATHt@tf OP UNtffiQ)g BUIIDIN(E", 1985 IDITIfN; TEE "IMPl7M fIL71SIN0 078", 1985 IDITIQi; TE8 "fItI1CyM EQIEDIIC SBI.lt1TY 078", 1985 IDITIfN; WITH CZZO'AIN AtflatH~t19, AWITIQ4S, Dffi.El'IQ8 AE1D E7gFPfION9 70 SAID OlD®, [EG.[DIEG PENALTIES • A. RCITALB (i) Article 2 of Chapter 1 of Pert 1 of Division 1 of Title 5 0[ the California Goverment Code suthorlaes the adoption, by reference of the Uniform Adniniatrntive Code, 1985 Edition; the Uniform Building Code, 1995 Edition; the Uni form IDl lding Cade Stenderde, 1985 Edition: the rm. r,.,.., Me c.".er.icsl Coda, iSeS cdi tron; the Uniform Plumbing Code, 1993 Edition including ell appendices; the National El ectricnl Code, 1997 Edition; the Uniform Code for Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1985 Edition; the Unl form Housing Code, 1985 Edition; the Uniform Building 9ecuri ty Code, 1995 Edition; and the Uniform Sign Code, 1995 Edition, each as published by the international ConPerenee of Building Of [iotels and (or) the international Association of P1 umDing and Mechanical Officials or the National Fire Protection Association. (ii) AC lens[ one copy of each of said Codes and Standards certified es full, true and correct copies thereof by :he City Clerk of the C[ty of Rancho Cucamonga hove been filed in the oPf[ce of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 50n22.5. (iii) A duly noticed public hewing, ea required by California Government Code Section 50022.3, has been conducted end concluded prior to the adoption of this Ordi nenc^. (iv) All legs! prerequisites to the adoption of this ordinance have occurred. 3/P B. ORDINANCE. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council o[ the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine end ordain as follows: SECTION 1. In all respects es set forth in the Recitals, Pert A, of this Ordinance. SECTION 2. Title 15 0[ the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal o(~e, -entitled Buildin a end Construction, and Chapters 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, and 30 of the en ernerdino County Code adopted by Ordinance No. 37 of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ere hereby repealed, provided that said repeal shall not apply to or a=case any violation thereof occurring prior to tha effective date of this Ordinance end provide further that the Uniform Codes ns adopted by rate ranee and emended by Ordinances Nos. 17, 58, end 122 of this C[ty shell continue to be applicable to construction for which plans have been submitted for plan check end the plan cheek fees paid es of the effective date of this ordinance, provided that the permit/a therefor are issued no longer then ninety (90) days after the effective date of this Ordinance. r~ U Section 3. A new Title 1S is hereby added to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to reed, in words end figures, es • follows: Title 15 BUILD INGB AND OONSTRUCI'[ON Chfl Dters: 15.04 Codes Adoption 15.08 Administr etive Code 15.12 Building Code 15.16 Meehantcal Code 15.20 Plumbing Code 15.24 Electrical Code 15.28 ~ Code [or Abatement of Dangerous Buildings 15.32 Housing Code 15.38 Sign Code 15.40 Building 9ecuri ty Code SECTION 4. A new Chapter 15.04 is hereby added to the Rancho ucemonga Municipal Code to reed, in words end figures, as follows: r U 3/`Y Chanter 15.04 Codes Adoption • Sections: 15.04.010 Codes Adoption 15.04.010 Codes Ado lion. The "Uniform Administrative Code", 19 5 Ed t:on; the "Uni orm Building Code", 1985 Edition, including all appendices theretot the "Uniform Building Codes Standards", 1985 Edition; the "Uniform Mechanical Code^, 1985 Edition including ell nppendioes theretot the "Uniform Plumbing Code", 1985 Edition, including ell appendices thereto; the "Notional Electrical Code", 1987 Edition; the "Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings", 1985 Edition] the "Uniform Housing Code", 1985 Edition; the "Uniform Building Security Code, 1985 Edition; and the "Uniform Sign Code", 1985 Edition; sre hereby adopted in their entirety na the Building end Construction Regul ationa of the City of Rsncho Cuesmonga, together with the amendments, additions, deletions and exceptions set forth to Chapters 15.08 thru 15.40 below. SECTION S: A new CASpter 15.08. is hereby added to the Reneho Cucemangs Municipal Code, to read in words and figures, as follows: Chanter 15.08 Ahninistrntive Code sections: 15.08.010 Section 202(a) Amended--General 15.08.020 Section 202(c) Amended--Right of Entry 15.08.030 Section 204 Amended--Appeals 15.08.040 Section 205 Amended--Violations and Penattie e 15.05.050 Section 301(b) Amended--Exempted Work 15.08.080 Section 302(e) tnformetion on Plsns and 3pec ificat lons 15.08.070 Section 303(8) Amended--Issuance 15.08.080 Sec[ton 303(d) Amended--Expiration 15.08.080 Section 303(f) Added--Unt[nlshed Building s 13.08.100 9eetion 304(e) Amended--Pees 15.08.110 9eetion 30S(h) Amended--Reinspections 15.08.120 Section 307(e) Amended--Er?rgy Connecti ons 3.t o Uniform Admtnes trattve~Code dis Gemended to reed ns follows of said • Section 202(a). General. The Building Official shall enforce the provisions of this Title, the Uniform Administrative Code, 1985 Edition end the technical codes referenced therein and shell have the responsibility for making interpretations thereof, [or deciding upon the approval of equipment and materials and for granting special permission provided for in a number of code sections therein. 15.080.020 Section 202(c) Amended--Ri ht o[ Entr . Section 2 c a say Uni orm A :n:stretive ode is hereby emended to read as follows: Section 202(c) Right of Entry. The Building Official, or his duly authorized representative, shall have the authority to enter any building or premises for the purpose of investigating the existence of suspected or reported damage or defeats which constitute en immediate danger to human lice or en Immediate Aezard to public safety or Aeslth. Except in emergency situations, the Building Official, or his authorized representative, shall not enter any occupied building or premises without the consent of the owner or oecupent thereof, • unless he possesses a warrant authorizing entry and search of the premises. No person shall hinder of prevent the Building Oftic[al, or his authorized representative, while [n the performance of the duties herein described as emerzenev ai ruatinna wh;,., possession of a warrant, from entering upon and into any end all premises under his jurisdiction, et all reasonable hours, for the purpose of inspecting the same to determine whether or not the provisions of this code, the referenced technical codes and ail other applicable laws or ordinances pertaining to the protection of persons of property ere observed therein. 15.08.030 Section 204 Amended--A eels. Section 204 of said Uni orm Administrative Code, :s hereby emended to read as eollows: Section 204(e) Appeals. A decision of the Building Official regarding interpretation or impiementetion o[ any provision of this Title, the L•niform Administrative Code, 1885 Edition, or the technical codes re [erenced therein shell be final end shell become effective forthwith upon the service o[ the decision of the Building Official, in writing, upon the permittee, appl[ennt or ether person affected by rye decision, hereafter celled permittee. Por purposes of this • section, service upon the permittee shall mean either personal delivery or placement in the United States Malt, postage prepaid, end addressed to the permittee at his lest known business address; provided, however, that 3~/ • the permittee may, within ten (10) days after the effective date of service of the decision of the Building Official, file en appeal with the City Clerk, in writing, specifying the reason or reasons for the appeal and requesting that the Board of Appeals review the decision of the Building Official. (b) Board of Appeals. The City Council or such other five (5) persons, other than employees of the City, that the Clty Council may appoint, shall act as a Board o[ Appeals in making a final determination of any appeal filed in accor dsnce with the provisions o[ 9uDSection (a) of this Section. The City Clerk shalt schedule a hearing on the appeal at reesoneble times and at the convenience of the Board of Appeals, Out not later then thirty (30) days after receipt of the written appeal. The permittee may appear in person before the Board or be represented by en attorney and msy introduce evidence to support his eleim. The Building Official shall transmit to the Board all records, papers, documents end other materials to support of his decision end shall provide a copy thereof to the permittee appealing the decision of the Building Official. The permittee appealing the decision of the Building Official shall cease, st his own expense, say tests or research required by the Board to substnntinte his claim to De performed or otherwise carried out. The Board may continue such sppenl hearing tram time to time es deemed necessary by the Board. The Board may, by resolution, affirm, reverse, or modify in whole or in part, any eppeated dec~aton, determination or interpretation o[ the Building Official. A copy of the resolution adopted by the Board shell De mailed to the permittee end the Board's decision shall be final upon the mailing, by United States Msil, postage prepaid, to the permittee's test known address of record. Notwithstanding the foregoing, appeals tiled in relation to substandard residenttel buildings shall be processed in accordance with Section 203 of the Uniform Housing Code. 15.08,040 Section 205 Amended--Violations end Penalties. Section 0 o said Uni orm Administrnt~ve Code is hereby emended to reed as follows: Section 205 Violations and Penalties. It shell be unlawful [or any person, firm, or corporation fo erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, improve, .~ convert or demolish, equip, use, occupy, or maintain any building or structure in the City, or install or alter any electrical, plumbing, mechanical work done,or cause the acme to De done, contrary to or in violation of any o[ the provisions of this Title. 3az Any person, firm, or corporation violating any of [he • provisions of this Title shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each end every day or portion thereof during which any violation of any o[ the provisions of this Code is committed, continued, or permitted, end upon conviction of any such violation such person shall be punishable by a tine of• not more then One Thousand Dollars (51,000), or by imprisonment [or not more then six months, or by both such tine and imprisonment. Section 3 1 D 1 o sa;d Uni orm Adman suet uve cCodetes emended to read es follows; Section 301(b) 1. Building Permits. A building permit shall not De required for the following: A. One story detached accessory buildings used ea toot end storage sheds, playhouses, end similar uses, provided the projected root arse does not exceed 120 square feet. B. Wood, chainlink, plastic metek or similar light weight fences not over 8 feet in height above the lowest adjacent grade. • C. Oil derrteks. D. MoveDle cases, counters end partitions not over 5 f-wt hiEA, E. lie teining walls sad masonry fences whleh are not over 3 feet in height above the lowest adjacent grade, unless supporting a surcharge load or intended for impounding flammable liquids. P. Water tanks supported directly upon grade i[ the capac[ty does not exceed 5000 gallons and the ratio of height to diameter or width does not exceed two [o one. C. Platforms, walks and driveways not more then 30 inches above grade end not over any basement or story below. H. Painting, papering end similar ft nish work. [. Temporary motion picture, television end theater stage sets end scenery. J. Window awnings supported Dy an exterior wall of • Croup R, Division 3, and Group M Occupancies when projecting not more then 54 Inches from the supporting well. 3~ 3 K. Pre [a brieated swimni ng pools accessory to a Group . R, Division 3 Occupancy in which the pool walls are entirely above the adjacent grade end if the capacity does not exceed 5000 gallons. L. The changing or the advertising copy or message on a painted or printed sign. M. Painting, repainting or cleaning of an advertising structure provided no structural changes ere made. N. Signs less than 6 feet ebo ve grade that are not electrically lighted. O. Changing of theater marquees and similar signs specifically designed for the use of changeable copy. Unless otherwise exempted by this code, separate plumbing, electrical and mechanical permita will be required for the above exempted items. 13.08.080 Section 302(c) Amended--Information on Plana end Spec: icetiona. Section 3 c o the Uni orm Administrative Code is hereby amended to reed as follows: • Section 302(e). Information on plans end specifications. Plans and specifications shell be drawn to scale upon suDStantiel paper or cloth end shell be of sufficient clarity to indicate the location, nature and extent of the work proposed end show in detail that it will conform to the provisions of the technirtal ,.~a.a ^^^_ ~:: r2.cvuui laws, or di nencea, rules end re guletiona. Plans for buildings more than two stories in height of other then Groups R, Division 3 end M occupancies shall indicate how required structural end fire-resistive integrity will be maintained where a penetration will be made for electrical, mechanical, plumbing end eamnunication conduits, pipes end similar sys lama. Plans for grading work shell contain the information specified in Section 7008 of the Uniform Building Code es adopted and amended in Section 15.12.200 of this code. 15.08.070 Section 303(e) Amended--Issuance. Section 303(e) of the Uni orm Administrative Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 303(x) Issuance. The application, plans end apeci ti cations, end other date, filed by an applicant for permit shell be reviewed Dy the Building Officit: and may be i~ reviewed by other departments of this jurisdiction to verity compliance with any applicable lows under their jurisdiction. It the Building Official finds that the work described in the application for a permit end the plans, 3aN specifications and other data requirements of this code end pertinent laws end ordinances, Section 384 have been paid, he to the applicant. Exceptions: tiled therewith conform to the the technical codes end other . and that the tees specified in shell issue a permit therefor El ectricel permits shell only be issued to a person or persons qualifying under one or more of the following categories: a. A state licensed contractor or authorized representative of a state licensed contractor Dut only to the extent and for the work the person is licensed 6y the State of California to do. b• A bonatide owner of a single teml ly dwelling for electrical work within that dwelling, Including buildings and quarters accessory thereto. c. A person, firm or corporation regularly employing one or more qualified maintenance electrlciana. d. A representative of a charitable, non- profit organization for temporary work in connection with Christmas tree lots, enrnivsls, fireworks stands end similar non-permanent installations, provided that work covered by the permit is to be performed by members of the organization and furthermore that there are to De no persons employed et the location where such temporary wiring is installed. Such permit shell expire within a time specified by the Building Otticiet, no[ exceeding six (8) months time, and shall not be renewed, A representative oL another city, county, state district or other political subdivision tot electrical work to be performed on the premises of said politics! subdivision. `J When the Building Official issues the permit where plane ere required, he shell endorse in writing or stamp the plena end specifications "APPROVED^. Such approved plans end speciticetlona shell not be changed, modified or altered • without authorizations from the Building Official, end ell work shell be done in accordenee with the approved plans. 3~~ • The Building Official may issue a permit for the construction of par[ of a building, structure or building service equipment before the entire plans and specifications [or the whole building, structure or building service equipment have been submitted or approved, provided adequate information and detailed statements have been filed complying with all pertinent requirements of the technical codes. The holder o[ such permit shell proceed at his own risk without assurance that the permit [or the entire building, structure or building service will De granted. 15.08.080 Section 303(d) Amended--Ex iration. Section 303(d o said Uni orm A nistrntive Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 303(d) Expired on. Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of the technical codes shall expire by limitation end become null and void, if the bulld[ng or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit, or it the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days. Before such work can be recommenced, e new permit shell De first obtained to do so, end the tee therefore shell be one-halt the amount required for a new • permit for such work, provided no changes have been made or will be made in the on ginnl plena end speci ticetiona for such work; and provided further that such suspension or abandonment has not exceeded one year. Any permittee holding an uno xniron ...~~. ,_ ;~~;~ !~,- extension of the time, within which to commence work under that permit, when he is unable to commence work within the time required by this section for good end setistactory reasons. The Building Official may extend the time for action by the permittee for a period not exceeding 180 days upon written request by the permittee showing that circumstances beyond the control of the permittee have prevented action from Deing taken. No permit shall be extended more then once. In order to renew action on an extended permit after expiration, the permittee shell pay a new u 1Z` I permit fee. 15.08.090 9ectlon 303(f) Added--Unfinished 8uildin s. Section o sa Uni orm A in:strative Code :s hereby emended by adding subsection ([) to read as follows: Section 303(f) Un [i nished Buildings end Structures. Whenever the Building Official determines by Inspection that work in or on any building or structure for which a permit has been issued and the work started thereon has been suspended for e period of 180 de ys or more, the owner of the i •operty upon which such building or structure is located or other person or agent in control of said property, upon receipt of notice in writing from the Building Official to do so, shall, within 90 days tram the date of such written notice, obtain a new permit to complete the required work end diligently pursue 3d~ the work to completion or shell remove or demolish the • building or structure within 180 days from date of the written native. 15.08.100 Section 304 Amended--Fees. Section 304 of said L'ni[orm Administrative Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 304(a) Feea. The tee tar each permit shell be as established Dy Resolution of the City Council. The determination of value or valuation under any of the provisions o[ this code shad be made by the Building Official. The vnl ue to be used in computing the building permit and building plan review tees shad be the total value of ell construction work for which the permit is issued es well as ell finisa work, pointing, roofing, electrical, plumbing, heating, air-conditioning, elevators, fire extinguishing systems and any other permanent equipment. Whenever any work, for which a permit is required by this Code, Aes been commenced without first obtaining said permit, and when such work is discovered as a result of en investigat[on by the Building Official or his duly authorized representative, the permit Feea spealtied Dy tae Ctty Council shell be doubted. The pnymeni of such double fee shall not exempt any person from compliance with ell other provisions of this Code nor [ram any penalty prescribed by lsw. • Section 304(b) Plan Review Fees. When a plan or other data is required to be submitted by Subsection (b) of Section 302, a plan review fee shall be paid et the time of submitting plans end apeciftaatlons for review. Payment of a plan ...• tC~ c ~Jf~iiucreu as pC[mli tlppllCa[100 Only [Or the'work desa r~i bed on the epplicetion form and for which the plan review fee is paid. Where plans ere incomplete or changed so es to require additional plan review, nn additional plan review fee shall be charged. Pees for plan review shell be es set forth by City Council Resolution. Section 304(c) Expiration of Plen Review. Applications for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application shell expire by limitation, and plans and other data submitted [or review may thereafter De returned to ±he applicant or destroy¢d by the Building Official. The Building Official may ¢xtend tae time for action by the applicant, for a period not a:ceeding 180 days, upon written request, showing that circumstsnces beyond the control of the applicant have prevented action from being taken. No • epplicetion shall be extended more then once. In order to renew action on en application after expiration, the applicant shell resubmit plans end pay a new plan review fee. 3~~ (d) Exemption From Fees. Neither the State nor any other • county, city, district, or other political subdivision, nor any public officer or Dody acting in his official capacity on hehalt of the State or of this or any county, city, district, or other political subdivision shall pay or deposit any tee required by this code. This Section does not apply to the State Compensation Insurance Pund or Public Housing Authority or where a public officer is acting with reference to private assets which have come under his Jurisdiction by virtue of his office. (e) Ae funds. In the event that any person shall nave oDtei ned a permit and no portion of the work or construction covered by such permit shall have been conmenced and such permit shall have expired as provided [or in Subsection (d) of Section 302, the permittee, upon presentation to the Building Official of a written request, shall be entitled to a refund in en amount equal to eighty percent (80%) o[ the permit tee actually paid for such permit; however, the portion of the tee retained Dy the City shell never be leas then twenty dollars (=20.00) or the total amount paid, whichever is leas. In the event a permit is issued in error by the Building Official, ell fees shall be returned to applicant upon written request. No refund shell be granted when receipt of the request occurs • more then 180 dsys following payment of the permit or plan check fee. No portion of a plan checking tee shell be refunded, unless no checking has been performed on a set of pions, in which cane eighty percent (80%) of the plan checking fee shell be refunded; however, the portion o[ the fee re teined shalt n.~. n. 1. th- _ (520.00), or the total amount pnid,•whichever ~Iis lessuVli61>, The Building Official shell satisfy hi mseLt as to the right of such applieent to such refund and each such refund shell be paid as provided Dy law for the payment of claims against the City. 15.08.110 Section 30S(h) Amended--Reins actions. Section 303(h o said Uni orm Admintstrntive Code is hereby emended to reed as follows: Section 305(h) Reinspectiona. A reinspection fee, es set forth in City Council Resolution, may be assessed for each inspection made necessary due to work not being ready at the time inspection is requested or for work not corrected after prior written notice. In instances where reinspectiona fees have been assessed, no edditionsl inspection of the work shell be performed until the required tees have been paid. +~ 15.08.120 Section 307(x) Amended--Ener Connection. Section 307 n o said Uni orm Administrative Code is hereby emended to reed as follows: 3~ y Section 307(x) Energy Connection. No person shall make . connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by the technical codes and for which a permit is required by this cod¢, unless such required permits ere obtained and applicable final building, electrical, plumbing and/or mechanical inspections have been made end ell conditions of development approval have been completed or guaranteed, except es provided for in 3ubsectlon(d). SECTION 6. Anew Chapter 15.12 is hereby added to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to reed, in words end figures, es follows: Chapter 15.12 Building Code Sections 15.12.010 Chapters 1,2,3 Deleted 15.12.020 Section 420 Added definition-- 3wimming Pool 15.12.030 Section 1101 Amended--Group "M" Occupancies 15.12.040 • Section 1103 Amended--fire-Resistive Pr oteotion 15.12.050 Section 1105 Amended--Garsge Ploor 3urfeces 15.12.080 Rerrinn 77oa ~m...n.n__apl.~.t ... n~~l .•e Fencing 15.12.070 Section 1210 (a) Amended--Fire Warning System 15.12.080 Section 1704 (e) Amended--Root Coverings 15.12.090 Section 1717 Added--Underfloor Aresa 15.12.100 Table 23-D Amended--Allowable Deflection 15.12.110 Section 2907(b) Amended--Bearing Walls 15.12.120 Section 320T(a) Amended--Roof Construction and Materials 15.12.136 Section 3203 (f) Amended--Ordinary Roof Cov ering 15.12.190 Section 3203 (g) Deleted 15.12.150 Section 3708 Added--Spark Arrestor 15.12.160 Appendix Chapter 12 Deleted !5.12.170 Appendix Section 3210 Amended--Retooling 15.12.180 Append[% Section 7003--Exempt Grading 15.12.190 Appendix Section 7004--Hazardous Grading 15.12.200 Appendix Section 7005 Added Definitions--Pinal, Pre![mi,ary • Grading Plana 15.12.210 Appendix Section 7008 Amended--Permits Required .3.1 S • 15.12.220 Appendix Section 7007 Amended--plan Review Feea 15.12.230 Appendix Section 7008 Amended--Bonds 15.12.240 Appendix Section 7010 Amended--Fills 15.12.250 Appendix Section 7011 Amended--Setbacks 15.12.260 Appendix Section T013 Amended--Erosion Controls 15.12.010 Chn tees 1 2 end 3--Deleted. Chapters 1, 2, end 3 o said Uni orm u: ding Code ere hereby deleted in their entirety. 15.12.020 Section 420 Added Definition--Swt mmin Pool. 3ect:on 4 0 o said ni orm Build ng Code is hereby emended Dy addition of the following definition: Section 420. Swimming Pool is any body of water created by artificial means designed or used for swimming, immersion or therapeutic purposes. 15.12.030 Section 1101 Amended--Crou M Occu enciee. Section 1101 o act Uni orm Building Code is hereby amen ed to reed es follows: Section 1101. Group M Occupancies shell be: • Division 1. private Garages, carports, sheds end similar structures accessory to residential structures, and egriculturel buildings. Division 2. Pences over 8 feet high, tanks, towers end ewimmine nnnte For occupancy separations, see Table 5-B. emended to read es follows: 3eetion 1103. Por tire-resistive protection of exterior wells end openings as Aetermined by location on property, see 3eetion 504, Part IV, end Appendix Chapter 11. Section 1105 o sa read as follows: emended to 3eetion 1105. Garage floor surfaces in building areas where motor vehicles era operated or stored shell be of noncombustible, nonabsorbent construction. °~ 15.12.080 Section 1307(e Amended--Swi mmin Pool Fencin . Section 110 o said Un orm utl ng o e is ere y amen ed to read es follows: 330 Section 110T(s). Swimming Pool Fencing. Every person in • possession of land under a contract, or as owner, lessee, tenant, licensee, or otherwise, upon which is si lusted a swimming pool, having a water depth exceeding 18 inches, shall, at all times, maintain s fence or other structure completely surrounding such pool and extending not less than five feet (8'0"), measured vertically, above any walking surface, wall or other climaDle structure, within two feet (2'0") of the exterior of the enclosure. Openings in such fence or structure, other than those created by gates or doors, shell be of such size so that a sphere exceeding 4" (4 inches) in diameter will not peas between adjacent members. Members o[ such pool enclosure shall not be arranged so as to materially facilitate climbing or scaling by small children. Gates or door openings through such enclosure shall be equipped with self closing and self-latching devices designed to keep, and capable of keeping, such door or gate securely ctoaed et all times when not in actual use; Dowever, the door of any dwelling occupied Dy human beings which forms any pert of the enclosure herein required need not be so equipped. Required latching devices ahali be located not less than tour feet, six inches (4'-8") above the round. The poot enclosure shell be in place end approved Dy the Building Official Detore water is placed in the pool. • EXCEPTIONS: 1. The provisions of this section shall not apply to public swimming pools re¢uleted by State BuiiAi"a Standards approved by the State Building Standards Commission. 2. Any fencing serving es an enclosure for a swimming pool, lawfully in existence on the date o[ adoption of this ordinance, end meeting the requirements for fencing in effect et the time of construction o[ the swimming pool, may be continued, however, any replacement of fencing in whole or in part, shall comply with the requirements set forth above. b) Where applicable (see Section 103) for agricultural buildings, see Appendix Chapter. 15.12.070 Section 1210(x) Amended--fire Warnin S stems. Section 1210 e o said Uni orm Building Code ~s hereby amen ed to read es follows: Section 1210(e). Pire-Warning Systems. Every dwelling unit end every guest room in a hotel or lodging h~~~se used for sleeping purposes shell be provided with smoke detectors • conforming to U.B.C. Standard No. 43-8. In dwelling units, de :actors shell be mounted on the ceiling or well et a point centrally located in the coreidor or area giving access to rooms used [or sleeping purposes. [n en efficiency dwelling 33/ unit, hotel sleeping room end in hotel suites, the detector shell De centrally located on the ceiling of the main room or hotel sleeping room. Where Bleeping rooms are on en upper level, the detector shell De placed at the center of the ceiling directly above the st airway. All detectors shall be located in sccordan ce with approved manufacturer's instructions. WAen nc loafed, the detector shall provide en alarm in the dwelling unit or guest roan. When habitable space having a vaiueti on exceeding 51,000.00 or when one or more sleeping rooms ere added or created in existing Croup R, Division 3 Occupancies, the entire bud ding shell be prov(ded with smoke detectors located as required for new Group R, Division 3 Occupancies. In new construction, required smoke detectors shell receive their primary power from the building wiring when such wiring is served tram a cammerclal source. Wiring shall be permanent and without s disconnecting switch other then those required for overcurrent protection. Smoke detectors may De bsttery operated when installed in existing buildings, or in buildings which undergo alterations, repairs or sdditions regulated by the second paragraph of this section. A smoke detector shall De installed in tha basement of • dwelling units having n stairway which opens from the basement into the dwelling. Such detector shell be connected to a sounding device or other detector to provide an alarm which will De eudi ble in the sleeping ores. 15 19 aOn o....~:_- -~ -- '"" Mug uueu--nuui woven n s. Section 1704 o end Un worm ~il't ng o e a ereby amen a to read es follows: Section 1704(n) Root Coverings. Root coverings shall De fire retardant except in Types Ii[,[V end V buildings, where it may be ea [ollows: Ordinary roof coverings may be used on buildings o[ Group R, Division 3 or Group M Occupancies. 2. Class C root coverings whleh comply with U.B.C. Standard No. 32-7 may be used on Group R, Division 1 Occupancies which are not more then two stories in height and hove not more than 6000 square feet of projected root area and there is a minimum of 10 feet tram the extremity of the toot to the property lines on all sides except [or street fronts. Roof mounted skylights shall De constructed es required in Chapter .~ 34. Penthouses shall De constructed sa .equlred in °' Chapter 38. Por use of plastics In roots, see Chapter 52. Por Attic access end area, See Section 3205. For Roof Drainage, see Section 3207. 331 (b) Fire Stopping. Root coverings having openings ei eaves. which would allow the entrance o[ embers or flames shall be fire-stopped at eave ends to preclude entry of embers or flames under the roof covering. 15.12.090 Section 1717 Added--Underfloor Areas. CAapter 17 of said Uni orm uild:ng o e is hereby emended y addition of Section 1717 to read as follows: Section 1717. Underfloor Areas. Buildings or structures shell have all underfloor areas enclosed to the ground with construction as required for exterior wnlls. EXCEPT1ON3: 1. Enclosure is not required when the underside of ail exposed floors end ell exposed structural columns, beams and supporting walls are of non-conbuatible construction or protected with one-hour fire resistive mated al s. 2. The underside of cantilevered wood beiconies and unroofed weiking "decks", constructed entirely of 2^ or greater nominal thickness wood joists and decking, need not be Enclosed. $. Woo0 st ructursl membero having a minimum dimension • of 8" nominal, tongue and groove Mooring of 1 3/2" net thickness or plywood flooring of I 1t8" net thickness need not ba enclosed or fire-protected, 15.12.100 Table 23-D Amended--All oweble ne!l zciion. TeDle 29-D o said n orm url ng ^~! l; hereby emende to read, in words end figure.a, :; iu a ows: TABLE !J-D YA2110! ALLUTAHLE DETLELTiU1 Pt7a S'PBDGTOiAL t80B>m6a 1®B~ LUADIID 11116 1®BBa LLIAD® LIY6 LOAD PL06 L[Y6 I.DAD dN1.7 DBAD LOAD tTPg OP IBOB L.L. L. + H D.L. Ploor Members, Roof Members Supporting Plsstar, Root Hembers Supporting Dead Loads L/380 L/240 Exceeding 50 Percent of Give Lo ds •SUffiafent slope or camber shell be provided tot flat roofs in aacordanee with Section 23051E 1. • L.L. Live Losd D.L. Dead Land K = Factor datermined by TsD1s No. !3-E L Length of member in name units es deflection 33~ • 15.12.110 Section 2907(b) Amended--Bearin Walls. Section 2907 b o said Uni orm Butl ing Code is hereby emended to reed as follows: Section 2907(bI. Bearing Walls. Bearing walls shall be supported on masonry or concrete toundetions or piles or other approved foundation system which shall be o[ sufficient size to support all loads. Where a design ie not provided, the minimum foundation requirements for stud bearing wells shall be as set forth in Table No. 29-A. EXCEPTIONS: A One story wood or metal frame bu[Iding not used for human occupancy end not over 200 square teat in floor areas may be constructed wThout masonry or concrete toundetions if wells ere supported Dy a Portland cement concrete slab not less then 3 1/2" in thickness. 2. The support of build[ngs by posts embedded in earth shall be designed es specified to Saetion 2907(1). Wood posts or poles, embedded in earth shall be pressure treated with en approved preservative. Steel posts or poles shnll be • protected as specified in Section 2908th). 15.12.120 Section 3202)a) Amended--Root Construction end Materials. Section 2 e is hereby amended to reed as ollows: a.,..: onnni-~ ---• ~-~~.. :oof Cuuairuuiiun end materiels. Noo[ covering ys hall be securely fastened to the supporting root construction and shall provide wenther protection [or the building at the root. In locntiona designs fed as Special Wind Regions on Pi gore No. 4, Chapter 23, the Building Official may require supplementary fastening or attachment methods to those specified in Table No. 32-B. Spaced sheathing for wood roots shalt be spaced not to exceed 6" dear nor more then the nominal width o[ the sheathing board. Sheathing ~boerda shell be not less then 1 inch by 4 inches nami net dimension. Di egonal and sway Dreeing shall be used to brace all root trusses. 15.12.130 Section 3203(1 Amended--Ordinar Root Coverin . Section o se n[ orm u: ding Code is hereby amen ed to read as follows: Section 3203(1). Ordinary Root Covering. An o~~d[nary root covering shell be any one of the following roofings: Any root covering listed in Section 3203(e). 33Y Any built-up roofing assembly not less than Class C • roofing. Any mineral aggregate surface built-up roof for application to roots having a slope o[ not more then 3 inches to 12 inches applied es specified in Section 3203(d) 2, consisting o[ not less than the following: Base Sheet and Plies Three layers of Type 15 organic or inorganic [fiber felt, and Surfacing Material 300 pounds per rooting square of gravel or other approved surfacing material, or 250 pounds per rooting square of crushed slag In 50 pounds o! asphsit, or 80 pounda of pitch. Any prepnr ed rooting not less then Class C roofing. EXCEPTION: Unless otherwise required because of location as specified in Parts IV and V o[ this • code, Group M, Division 1 root coverings may consist of not less than one layer of 55-pound smooth-surfaced organic cap sheet, or built-up rooting consisting of two layers of Type 15 organic fiber felt end one Layer o[ satiating materiai ns specified on Section 2202([)3. 15.12.140 Section 3203(8) Deleted. Section 3203(8) o[ said Uniform Building Code is hereby a eted. 15.12.150 Seetfon 3703 Added--S ark Arrestor. Section 3703 of said Uni orm Burl [ng Code [a hereby emended by adding a new subsection (h) to read as follows: Section 3703 (h) Spark Arrestoe. Any chimney, flue, vent, or stovepipe ettaehed to any solid or liquid fuel burning [i replace, stove, barbeque, or other similar device hereafter installed within or attached to any building or structure, shall be equipped with an approved spark arrestor. A spark arrestor is defined es a device constructed of non- combustible meterinl equivalent to 12 gauge steel welded or woven wire mesh or 3/IB" thick cast iron plate. Perforations or openings in spark arrestors shell be not less then one- halt inch (1/2") and not larger than Live-eights inches, (5/8") and shell be of sufficient number so as [.ot to reduce . the required flue area. Spark arrestors shall be installed in such a manner as to be visible for Inspection and accessible for malntenence. 33~- 15.12.180 Appendix Chapter 12 Deteted. Appendix Chapter 12 • of the U~orm mil ng Code is hereby deleted. 15.12.1?0 Appendix Section 3210 Amended--Reroofin¢. Section 3210 of the peen x o[ t e Uni orm Building'-Comae is hereby emended to read as follows: Section 3210. Reroofing. New root coverings for existing buildings shell not be applied without first obtaining a permit therefor from the Building Official. An inspection may De required to determine the ncceptebility of an existing structure for reroofing. A final inspection and approval shall be obtslned from the Building Official when reroofing is completed. 15.12.180 end[x Section T003 Amended--Exempt Gradin¢. Sect~t on 7565 o t o Appen x o t o ni orT-m~u iTatng Coe s hereby amended to rend as follows: 9eetion 7003. Exempt Grading. No person shell do any grading without first having obtained a grading permit tram the Building Official except for the following: 1. Removal of surface deposits of Improperly placed material or refuge. , • 2. M excavation below finished grsde for basements end foot[ngs of a building, retaining wall or other structure authorized by a valtd budding permit. This shell not a:empt anq fill msde with 4he material from such excevetion nor exempt any excevetion having en unsupported height arester then S feet otter the completion of such structure. 3. Cemetery grave a. 4. Refuse disposal sites controlled by other regulations. 8. Excavstions for wells or tunnels or utilities. 8. Mining, quarrying, excavating, processing, stockpiling of rock, send, gravel, aggregate or clay where esteDliahed and provided for by law, provided such operstlons do not effect the lateral support or increase the stresses in or pressure upon any adJecent or coati guous property. 7. Explore tory excavations under the direction of soil engineers or engineering geologists. 8. M excavation which (a) is lass thaw 2 feet In depth, or (b) which does not create a cut slope greater than S feet In height and steeper than two horizontal to one vertical (2:1) end that is of less than 100 cubic yards. 3]~ 9. A till less than 1 toot in depth; placed on natural . terrain with slope not exceeding 5 horizontal to t vertical (5;1), provided that the grading is in en isolated, sett-contained area and does not endanger private or public property. 10. Fill lass than 3 feet in depth and not exceeding 100 cubic yards, placed on a single parcel, provided that the till does not obstruct a drninege course. 11. An exenvat[on for pipeline or other underground utility lines installed under a aeparete permit, provided that any necessary erosion control measures are made pert of that permf t. 12. Public Works projects not requiring a building permit including sewer and storm drain construction, utility trenches, power transmission lines and appurtenant access roads end retsining walls or grading accomplished as pert of street maintenance activities. 13, Recurring, regularly scheduled maintenance of existing facilities where no new construction is involved. • 14, Ylnergeney repairs to exiating facilities resulting from natural or civil disaster including, but not limited to, rainstorm, flooding, earthslide, heat storm, eerthquske, riot, sabotage, end the like. g, sec n on 'r uua o[ the Appendix o[ the Uniform Building s hereby emended to read as (allows: Section 7004. Hszardoua Grading. Whenever the Building Official determines that any exiating natural slope, or say excavation, embankment, fill or other condition created by a grading project has become a hazard to life or limb, or endangers property, or adversely affects the safely, use or stability of a public way or drninege channel, the Building Ct[icial may give the owner of the property upon which the condf tl on is located, or other person or agent in control o[ said property, a written notice to abate the condition. Upon receipt of such written notice from the Building Official, the owner ar other person or agent in control of said property shall within the period specified in the notice repair or eliminate such natural slope, excavation, embankment, [[ll or other condition so as to eliminate the hazard and be in conformance with the requirements of this Code. • 15.12.200 A endix Section 7005 Added--Definitions. Section T005 of the Append x o the Uni orm Building Code is hereby emended Dy adding the following definitions: 33~ • 1. Pinal Gradtn Plan is a plan showing all detailed drainage n ormation, grade elevations, locations and floor elevations o[ any buildings. Preliminary Gradin¢ Plsn fa a plan showing building pad elevations, typical drainage methods to be utilized, and similar generalized information, usually ,excluding finish floor elevations, building locations, and specific drainage details. 15_12.210 Appendix Section 7006 Amended--Permits Required. Section T008 of the Appendix o the Uni orm uilding Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 7008(a). Permits Required. Except es exempted in Section 7003 of this Code, no person shell do any grading without first "obtaining a grading permit from the Building Official. A separate permit shell De required for each site, and may cover both excevstiona end tills. Grading permits may be issued based upon suDmitt al of either a preliminary or final grading Alen. The preliminary grsding plan requirements shall apply where insuff[cient precise deta[1 of site improvement exists st the time of grsding permit issuance. Where grading is accomplished baeed upon e preliminary grading pl nn the submittel~snd approval of a • final grading plan shell be required prior to the issuance of any building permit for the site. Preliminary grading plans shall include auttictent detail to assure that et the time of final grading plan submittal, all standards and specifications of this code and other City grading regulations will be met. (b) Appliceti on. The provisions of Section 302(b) ere applicable to grading end in addition the application shall state the estimated quantities of work involved. (c) Plans end Specifications. When required by the Building Official, each applicat[on for a gredi ng permit shall be aecompnnied Dy three sets of plans end specifications, end supporting date consisting of a soils engineering report end engineering geology report. The plans end speci ticetions shall be prepared end signed by a civil engineer when required by the Building Official. (d) Information on Plana end in 9pecificationa. Plan shell be drawn to scale upon suDstsntiai paper or cloth and shall be of sufficient clarity to indicate the nature and extent of the work proposed end show in detail that it will conform to the provisions of this Code end all relevant laws, ordinances, rules end regulations. The first sheet of each set of plena shall give the Iocstion of the woek and name and .~ address of the owners and the person by venom they were prepared. The plans shall include the following Information: General vleinity of the proposed site. 33P 2. Property limits end accurate contours of existing • ground and details of terrain end area drainage. 3. Elevations and finish contours to be achieved by [he grading. 4. Detailed plans of all surface and subsurface drainage devices, walls, cribbing, dams end other protective devices to be constructed with, or es a part o[, the proposed work together with a map showing the drni nege area and the estimated runoff o[ the area served by any drams. 5. Location o[ any buildings or structures on the property where the work is to De performed end the location of any buildings or structures on lend of adjacent owners which ere w7 thin 15 feet of the project site or which may De affected Dy the proposed grading operations. 8. Size, type and condition of vegetation that is to remain. 7. Legal restrictions ouch es property linos, easements, setbacks, etc. 8. Utility structures, catch basins, manholes, • culverts, etc. 9. Drainage, sewer, water, gee, electric or other u[:l: ty [Ines. 10. Any onus unl site conditions. Contours, both existing and proposed, shall be shown in accordance with the following schedule: Natural 3looes Maximum Interval 2% or less 2 feet Over 2% to end including 9% 5 feet Over !1'K 10 feet 3pecitieat[ons shall contain information covering construction and materiel requirements. (e). Solt Engineering Report. The soils engineering report required by subsection (c) shell include date regarding the nature, distrtbution end strength of existing soils, concluaiona end recommendations for grading procedures end design criteria for corrective meaaurea when necessary, end • opinions and recommendntione covering adequacy of sites to be developed Dy the proposed grading, including the stability of slopes. 33s • (g). Issuance. The provisions of Section 303 ere applicable to grading permits. The Building Official may also require submittal of the following additional inf ormetion with the permit application. 1. Extent and manner of cutting of trees and clearing of vegetation, disposal of same, and measures for protection of undisturbed trees and/or vegetation. 2. Schedule defining staging and timing of construction and estimated extent of disturbance et strategic points during construction. 3. Equipment, methods, and location of spoils disposal. 4. A plan defining the schedule, equipment, materials, end personnel that will be used to maintain alt pr oteative devices end drni nags facilities shown on the approved grading plan. S. I7esignatlon of routes upon whicA mstarlala may be transported and means of access to the site. 8. The location and manner to be used for disposal of excsvated materials and control o[ erosion tram such materials. • Z. Requirements as to the mitigation of fugitive dust end dirt which may be offensive or injuroua to the neighborhood, the general public or any portion thereof, including due considerstion, care. and raepaat for the property rights, convenience, and reasonable desires end the needs of said neighborhood or any portion thereof. 8. Limitations on the area, extent and duration of time of exposure of unprotected soil surfaces. 9. Any grading or drainage mittgsting measures specified in en Environmental impact Report prepared for the site pars uent to the Cali[ornia Environmental Quality Act. 10. Any grading or drainage requirements included as conditions of approval of a project on the site by the Planning Commission or the City Council. 11. Phasing o[ operations to minimize water run oft or other caul ronmentel concerns. 12. Such additional applicable information ea the Building Official msy require to carry out the purposes of this ordinance. 3y° (h ). Compliance with Plans and Code. The permittee or his • agent, shell tasty out the proposed work in accordance with the approved plans end specifications end in compliance with all the requirements of this Code. (i ). Inspections. In performing regular grading, it shell be [he responsibility of the permittee to notify the Building Official at least one working day in advance so that required inspections may be made. (j ). Protection o[ Adjacent Property. During grading operations, the permittee shell 6e responsible [or the prevention of damage to edjecent property and no person shall excavate on land sufficiently close to the property line to endanger any adjoining public street, sidewalk, alley, or other public or pr[veto property without supporting and protecting such property from settling, cracking, or other damage which might result. (k). Temporary Rrosion Control. The permittee shell put into effect end maintain all precautionary measures necessary to protect edjecent water courses end public or private property trap damage Oy erosion, flooding, end deposition of mud or debris originating from the site. 15.12.220 A endi: Chs ter 7007 Amended--Plan Review Pees. • Section o t e Appen s o the Uni orm a Id ng o e is hereby amended to reed as follows: Section 7007(x). Plan Review Pees. When a plan and/or other date are required to De sumitted, a plan review tee shall De pa.J ai iiie Tina of suomt[[ing plans and specifications [or review. Said plan review tee shall be ns set forth in City Council resolution. Separate plan review tees shall apply to retei ning walls end major drainage structures. (b). Grading Ptrmit Feea. A fee for each goading permit shall De paid to the Building Official as set forth in City Council Resolution. 9eparete permits end permit tees shell apply to retelning wells end major drainage structures as set forth in the Uniform ABninistrative Code for building permits. Cons t~r action valuation for major drainage structures shalt be determined based upon en estimate o[ the cost of their construction provided Dy the designer end approved by the Building Official. Wherc preliminary end final grading plans ere sutxnitted separately for pion checking and/or permit, tees shell be calculated from the work to be accomplished under each submittal. The tee for a grading permit euthorixing addit,onel work to . that under a valid permit shall be the difference between the tee paid for the original permit and the tee shown for the entire project. 3y/ • 15.12.230 A endix Section 7008 (mended--Bonds. Section 7008 o the Appendix o the Uni orm wilding Co a is hereby amended to reed es follows: Section 7008(a). Bonds. Prior to the issuance o[ a grading permit involving 5000 cubic yards or more of cut end till, the applicant shell first post with the Building Official, a bond executed by the owner as principal and a corporate surety authorized to do business in this State. In lieu o[ a surety bond, the applicant may file a cash Dond, or deposit end assign to the City, savings and loan certificates or other instruments of credit. Where unusual conditions or special hazards exist, the Building Official may require a bond for grading involving le sa than 5000 cubic yards. The Dond required by this Section msy include incidental ott- s[te grading on property contiguous with the site to be developed provided written consent of the owner of aueh contiguous property is tiled with the Building Ott[cisl. The Buildtng Official may waive the requirements for grading necessary to remove n geological hazard, where such work is covered Dy en agreement end bond posted pursuant to provisions of other Ordinsncea. • (b ). Amount of Bonds. The amount o[ the bond shall be based upon tAe number of cubic yards of materiel In both excavation end f[Il, plus the cost of ell drainage or other protective devices, work neceessry to eilminate geological hazards, erntinn nnnt~nl nlanr: ..w •"o ~••~ rcyaicZd :2tfiiulna ,veils, and masonry fences. That portion of the bond valuation Dssed on the volume of materiel shell De computed as set forth in the following schedule: 100,000 cubic yards or Iess.......50% of the coat of the grading work Over 100,000 cable yards.......... 50% of the cost of the first 100,000 cubic yards plus 25% of the estimated cost of that portion in excess of 100,000 cubic yards. (e). Reduction in Bond. When rough grading has been completed In conformance with the requirements of this Coda, the Building Official may at his discretion consent to e proportions to reduction of the bond to en amount estimated to be adequate to insure completion of the grading work, site development or planting remaining to be performe4. The costs referred to in this Section shell be ea estimated by the Building Official. (d). Conditions. Every Dond shall include the conditions that the principal shell: ?y~- 1. Comply with all of the provisions of City • ordinances, applicable laws, and standards. 2. Comply with all of the terms and conditions oC the grading permit. 7. Complete all o[ the work authorized by the permit within the time limit specified in the permit or within any extension thereof granted. No such extension of time shall release the surety upon the bond. (e). Term o[ Bond. The term of each bond shell begin upon the tiling thereof with the Building Official end the bond shell remain in effect until the work authorized by the grading permit is completed and approved by the Building Otficiel. (t). Oetault Procedures. In the event the owner or his agent ahnll toil to complete the work or toil to comply with ell terms and conditions of the grading permit, it shall be deemed a default hss occurred. The Building Official shall give notice thereof to the principal end surety on the grading permit bond, or to the owner in the case of a cash deposit or nssi gnment, end may order the work required to complete the grading in conformance with'the requirements o[ this Coda De performed. The surety executing the bond shell • continue to be firmly bound under en obligation up to the full amount of the bond, for the payment of all necessary costs and expenses that may De incurred Dy the Building Official in causing any and ell such required work to be done. [n the case of a cash deposit or assignment the unused Dortion nr e,,..D d.:pLail or [ands assigned shell De returned or reassigned to the person making said deposit or assignment. (g). Right of Entry. The Bui Lding Official or the authorized representstive of the surety dompnny shell have access to the premises described in the permit for the purpose vt inspecting the work. in the event of default in the performance of any term or condition of the permit the surety or the Building Official, or any person employed or engaged [n the Dehaif of either, shell have the right to go upon the premises to perform the required work. The owner or any other person who interferes with or obstructs the ingress to or egress from any such premises, o[ any authorized represenFative of the surety or of the City of Rancho Cucamonga engaged in the correction or completion of the work for which a grading permit has been issued, after a default has occurred in the performance of the terms or conditions thereof, is guilty of a misdemeanor. . 15.12.240 A endix Section 7010 Amended--Pills. Section 7010 o the Append x o the Unf orm u d ng Co a Is hereby emended to read as follows: 3~/7 . Section 70101e). Fills. Unless otherwise recommended in the approved soils engineering report and approved by the Building Official, fills shall conform to the provisions o[ this Section and to Pigure A, Typical Lot Cross-Seetion for Fills. WMY, 6/~0a ]0' ila~ / M~ 1 1 PAL Or.INOMI. r.. ]' MN n<oTOOCt ]e MN. ~yT~O .LN. NM d, VN N .wxo aNrnu SLOIa TO NWI M Mr\MM /I~ wN. W{IIILIe LIQT Orre0.0w 1 ~ C~.ITJ-10'+{ aaeesax saauewa 1/ e~Na1l 1 yLya ueu0a OMm vufa~L TO- OI WT lLO/a 10 /IYa 1! 1 •Oa,10eTY . -Ia ON! ~a~ TYRIO~I LOT CNO!!•!lCTION FOa RILL! to the abaenee of an approved soil engineering report these provisions may be waived [or minor tills not Intended to support structures. • (b). Pill Location. Fill slopes snail not be constructed on natural slopes steeper then two (2:1) to one or where the till slope toes out within 12 feet horizontally of the top of e lower existing or planned cut slopes except in the case of slopes of minor height when approved by the Building (c). Preparation of Cround. The ground surface shell be prepared to receive till by removing vegetation, noncomplying fill, top-soil and other unsuitable materials, senrifying to provide a bond with the new till, end, where slopes ere steeper than five to one, and the height greater than 5 feet, by benching into sound bedrock or other competent material as determined by the soils engineer. The Dench under the toe of e till on a slope steeper than five to one shell be et lens! SO feet wide. The area beyond the toe of till shell be sloped for sheet overflow or a paved dr nin shall be provided. Where till is to be placed over a cut, the bench under the toe of till shall be et least 10 feet wide but the cut must be made Detore placing fill and approved by the soils engineer and engineering geolog(st as a suitable foundation for till. (d). Fill Materiel. Detrimental amount of organic material shall not De permitted in tills. Except ns permitted by the Building Official, no rock or similar irred\~^ible mater[al with a maximlxn dimension greeter then t2 inches shell be buried or placed in tills. 3'!Y EXCEPTION: The Building Official may permit placement • of larger rock when the soils engineer properly devises a method of placement, continuously inspects its placement end approves the fill stability. The following conditions shall also apply: a) Prior to issuance of the Grading Permit, potential rock disposal areas shall be delineated on the grading plan. b) Rock sizes greeter than 24" in maximum dimension shalt be 10 feet or more below grade measured vertically. c) Rocks shall be placed so es to assure tilling of all voids with tines. (e). Compaction. All [ills shall be compacted to n minimum of 90% of maximum density se determined by U.B.C. Standard No. 70-1. Pield density shall be determined in accordance with U.B.C. Standard No. 70-2 or equivalent ea approved Dy the Building Offtciel. EXCEPTIONS: Pills exempted elsewhere in this ordinance end where the Building Official determines that • compaction la not a necessary as[ety measure to aid in preventing saturet[on, settlement, slipping, or erosion of the till. ~T,a~~ iuwer uensi [y end expena[ve types o[ soil exist, permission for lesser compaction may De granted by the Building Official upon showing o[ good cause under the conditions provided herein. All beckttll in utility line trenches shall De compacted and tested. The soils engineer shall verify that this beckfilling hea been set[sfactorily accomplished. Alternate methods of tilling and compaction may be utilized on specific projects when specified Dy the soil engineer and/or approved by the Building Of [i ciel. (f). Slope. The slope of till surfaces shell be no steeper than is sate for the intended use. Pill elopes shall be no steeper than two horizontal to one vertical. (g). Drainage and Terracing. Drainage end terracing shall be provided and the Brea above fill slopes end the surfaces of terraces shall be graded end paved ns required by Section 7012. • Syr 15.12.250 endix Section To11 Amended--Setbacks. Section TO11 o t e Appen x o the ni orm u:ld ng Coe is hereby emended to reed as follows: Section 7011(e) Setbse ks. The setbacks and other reatricti ons specif[ed by this Sect[on are minimun end may be increased by the Building Orticisl or by the recommendstion of a civil engineee, soils engineer, oe engineering geologist, it neceas ary for safety snd steDility or to prevent damage of adjacent properties from depostion or erosion or to provide access foe slope maintenance and drainage. Retaining walls may be used to reduce the required setbacks when approved by the Building Official. (D) 9etbacka from Property Linea. The tops of cuts end toes of till slopes shall De set back from the outer boundaries of the permit area, including elope areas and easements, in secordance with Pigure No. 70-1. • M• rw« 1 ewe rvtw2'.k ~~~' CMarli Tot yaM M l14s riaM cwaar • Perm: Ne Be,n,rry ~~Na7P1 tY! Yet Y aYa. ati 10' era. 3Y~ (c) Design Standards for Setbacks. SetDecks between graded slopes (cut and till) and structures shell be provided in accordance with figure No. 70-2. • d 11s of minvaum or ~~~ W:ichews is ~ d 9rabr, but 8 a!1 need Hoe ~"'~~ axcaM 10' IVl aw awe ~ Hera IS' awl. ~r~~ 15.13.380 9eation 7013 Amended--Erosion Controls. Section 7013 o the ppend x o the Un otm wild ng o e is hereby emended to rend ea follows: Section 7013(s) Erosion Controls. The faces of cut and till slopes shall be prepared and maintained to control against erosion. The proteat[on for the slopes shall be Installed as . soon ea practtenl end prior to calling for final approval. (D) Other Devices. whets necessary, check demo, cribbing, ri prep or other devices or methods shell be employed to control erosion and provide safety. (c) Planting. The surface of all cut and till slopes more than five (5) feet in height shall be protected against damage by erosion by planting with approved grass or ground cover plants. Slopes exceeding fifteen (15) feet in vertical height shall also be planted with shrubs and trees at equivalent spacings, in edditlon to the grass or ground cover plants. The pleats end pleating methods used shall be suitable foe the Boll and climatic conditions of the site. EXCEPTIONS: Planting need not be provided for cut slopes rocky in character and not aub)ect to damage Dy erosion, when approved by the Building Official. Slopes may be protected sgainst erosion damage by other methods when such methods have been specifically recommended by a soils engineer, engineering geologlet, or equivalent, end found to otter erosion protection equal to thsi pTOVided Dy • the planting specified in this Seatlon. .?4 7 (d). Irrigation. Slopes required to be pleated shall be provided with an approved system of irrigation designed to cover ell portions of the slope, end plans therefore shalt De submitted end approved prior to instsllation. A funetlonal test o[ the system may be required. The requirements [or permanent irtigation systems may be modified upon• specific recommendation of a landscape architect or equivalent authority that beesuae of the type of plants selected, the planting methods used end the soil and climatic conditions at the site, such irrigation system will not be necessary for the maintenance of the slope planting. (e) Release of Bond. The planttng and irrigation systems required by this Section shall De installed as soon es practical after rough grading. Prior to final approval o[ grading and before the release of the grading bond, the planting shall De well established end growing on the slopes. 3F.ffCION 7 A new Chapter 13.10 is hereby added to the Rancho ucamonga lgunteipsl Code to reed in words and figures es follows: Chapter 13.18 • Mechenieal Code Sections: 13.18.010 Chapters 1, 2, 3, Dalated. is '-°. ^:4 C~a :ers i z and 3 Deleted. Chapters 1, 2, and 3 of sal ni orm Mec an ca o e, 1 tlon ere hereby deleted. 3V P SECTION 8 A new Chapter 15.20 is hereby added to the • Rancho Cucamonga Munieipel Code to reed in words end figures es follows: Chapter 15.20 Plumbing Code 9ections• 15.20.010 Psrt I Deleted--Administration 15.20.020 9eetion 1004(a) Amended--Msterlals 15.20.030 Appendix Section D1(D)--Deleted 15.20.040 Appendix 9eetion D3. 4--Deteted 15.20.010 Pert I Deleted. Part 1 of said Uniform Plumbing Code, 1 d tlon, ent:t a "Aministrntion^ is hereby deleted in its entirety. 15.20.020 Section 1004(e) Amended--Materials. Seatlon 1004 a o sad n orm lumb~ng Coe s ereby amended to reed as follows: Suction 1DD{(a) Materiels. Water pipe add tittinga shall 6e of brass, aoppar, cast iron, galvanized steel, lead or other approved materiels. • Asbestos-cement, PB, or PVC water pipe manutnotured to recogntzed standards may be used for cold water distribution systems outside a building. All materiels used in the we ter _ :F'-y EfEt:.^.:, --apt .oi'rAS 66u Siu:iiar uerivna, aneii be o[ ~ like msterial, except when otherwise approved by the a Administrative Authority. 15.20.090 Appendix 9eetion D1(b) Deleted. Section D1(b) of Appendix D ot~s a-: n orm umbing Code is ereby deleted. 15.20.040 A endl: Section D3.4 Deleted. Section D3.4 of Appen :x o sn: n orm umb ng Code a ereby deleted. • 349 SECTION 9. Anew Chapter 15.24 is hereby added to the Rancho • Cucamonga Municipal Code to read, in words end figures, as follows: Chapter 15.24 Electrical Code Sections: 15.24.010 Chapter 2 Amended - Deletions 15.24.020 Cbapter 3 Amended - Deletions 15.24.030 Article 90 Amended - Introduction 15.24.040 Section 210-52 Amended - Basement Receptacle Outlets 15.24.050 Section 210-54 Added - Receptacles for Buildings Accessory to Dwelling Units. 15.24.080 Section 210-58 Added - Equipment Room Receptacles 15.24.070 Section 210-58 Added - Built-in Gaa Ovens. 15.24.080 9eetlon 210-70 Amended - Lighting outlets required. 15.24.090 Section 210-70(c) Added - Minimum Light Outlets-- Buiidings Accessory to Dwelling Units. 15.24.100 Section 220-110(e) Amended - Ampacity and Computed Loads. 15.24.110 Section 230-43 Amended - Wring Methods for 800 Volta or Lesa. . 15.24.120 Section 230-70 Amended - Service Equpiment-- Disconnecting Means Location. 15.24.130 Section 230-212 Added - Service Equipment Capacity. ts.xa.tan Section 900-15(c) Added - Soere Recewavs. 15.24.150 Section 310-14 Amended - Aluminum Conductors 15.24.160 Section 320-3 Amended - Open Wiring on Insulators --Uses Permitted. 15.24.170 Section 320-15 Deleted 15.24.180 Section 338-3(c) Amended - Usea Not Permitted 15.24.190 Section 338-2 Deleted. 15,24.200 Section 350-5 Amended - Flexible Metal Conduit Use for Grounding. 15.24.310 Seetlon 370-8(d) Added - Box Construction 15.24.230 Articles 550 and 551 Deleted. 15.24 .010 Che ter 2 Amended -- Deletions. Chapter 2 of said National lectrtcel Coe la hereby amen ed Dy deletion of sections 201(a), 201(c), 203 and 204. 15.24 .020 Chs ter 3 Amended -- Deletions. Chapter 3 0[ said National Electrical Coe is hereby amended Dy deletion of sections 302(a), 302(b), 902(c 1, 303(a), 303(d), 304(x), 304(b), 304(e), 3 04(d), 304(e), Table No. 3-A, 305(e) and 308(n). 3ro 15.2A.030 Article 90 Amended -- Introduction. Article 90 of the et~ona lectr;cal Coe is here y amended to read es follows: 40-1 Title. This coda shall be known as the Electrical Code. Whenever the work "code" is used in this chapter is shall mean the Blectrical Code of the City al Rancho Cucamonga. 90-2 Scope. The provisions of this code and the building standards contained herein, shell apply to the construction, eIteration, nerving, 4emolition, repair and use of all electrical equipment, wiring end systems in or on any building or structure err outdoors on any premises or property; except for such electrical equipment, wiring end systems which era expressly esempted by Section 90-3. 90-3 Exemptions. This code does not cover: nl Installations 1n ships, wrtercratt other than tloatfng dwelling units, railway rolling stock, aircraft, automotive vehicles, eaamercial cosches, mobilehomea and recreational vehicles. b) Installatfona underground in mines, mine shafts and tunnels. c) [nstallatlone of railways for generstion, trenstormation, transmission, or d[stributia~ ^: power used axclusivety for cue: alion of rolling stock or ~..^.c:a:.a n one used exclusively for ;ignslling and communication purposes. d) Installation at aortmunication equipment under the exclusive Control o[ comnuniaetion utitities, located outdoors or in building spsces used exclusively for such tnstallationa. eJ lnstallationa under the exclusive control of eteetricsl utilities for the purpose of communication, or metering; or tar the generation, control trnnatormation, transmission, and distribution of electrical energy located in buildings used exclusively by utilities toe such purposes or located outdaors on property owned or leased by the utility or on public highways, streets coeds, etc, or outdoors by established rights on private property. I..J ,3t/ EXCEPTION to (d) and (e): In places of employment, • the following shall apply: Installations of conductors, equipment and associated enclosures subject to the jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission, that are owned, operated end maintained by an electric, communications or electric railway utility, but not including Conduit, vaults, end similar enclosures containing conductors and equipment of such a uttllty when located indoors or on premises not used exclusively for utility purposes, except for the util(ty's conductors and equipment therein. t) Installations on Highways or bridges. 90-4 Enforcement. This code shall be enforced by the Building Otficiel as provided tar in Section 15.08.020 of this title. 90-5 Interpretstion a. [nterpretationa of this code shall be made by the Building Offleial es provided for in Section 19.03.020 of thin title. 90-8 Annual maintenance permit. My person, firm or corporation regularly employing one or more quslitied electrical maintenance electrieiena may make eppliestion for • end obtnln nn annual el ec triCel maintenance permit. Pees for such permit shall be es set forth by City Council resolution. Each annual electrical maintenance permit shall be valid for the year during which lasued. Prior to Jenuery 18th of each year, annual maintenance permits shall tie rPaPWP/l~ Work authorized by nn annual maintenance permit shall be limited to inatallntiona, alterations, eztensiona and maintenance of electrical wiring and equipment in or on existing buildings. 98-7 Monthly maintenance records. Any person, [i rm or corporation having obtained an ennuel maintenance permit shall keep a record of ell electrical equipment installed under such permit end the Building Official shell have access to such records. Within fifteen (IS) days following the end of each quarter- year, the person, firm or corporation to which such annual maintenance permit was issued shell transmit to the Bu[Iding Of[i ciel a quarterly report of all electrical work done during the preceding quarter end shall obtain a permit for such work.. Pees for quarterly permits for such work shall be those set forth for other electrical permits except there shell be no issuance fee charged. .~: a 90-8 Qualification o[ Maintenance Electricians. Every person • applying for qualification es maintenance electrician shall pay a tee, as set by resolution of the City Council, for examination and qunlificat[on, and by successfully passing an examination given by the Building Official, relative to electrica[ work. My person tailing to pass the examination may re-npply for qualificntion after a period of 90 days has lapsed and upon payment of a new examination tee. ' In lieu of examination, possession of a State Electrical Contractors license or proof of qualificntion by another governmental agency neceptsble to the Building Official may be considered as meeting the requiramenta of this section. Watver of examination shall not be considered as waiver of any fee required by this section. Ench ennuel maintenance electrician queliticatfon shall a:pine on December 21st of each year and shall be renewed within thirty (30) days therestter upon payment o[ an ennuel renewal tee as set by resolution of the City Council. 90-9 Approved Materials. All electrical materials, equipment and npptiancaa shall be approved Dy the Building Official for use or method of Installation prior to utilixstion within the scope of this Code. Listing or labeling as conforming to the standards of Underwriters Laboratories; [ne., the United States Bureau of Mines, the American standards Association, • the United Stated Bureau of Standards, or other simllsr inst(tution of recognized stsndtng, shall De prima facie evidence of conformity with approved standards of safety to life and property. Notwlthstsnding the foregoing, any materiel, method of installation, or equipment, the use o[ whinh ;~ tn. written oolnlon of the Bud ding Official would constitute an unreaaonsDle hazsrd to life or safety may be disappproved by the Budding Official, roc a vn <av-v< rnwnvev tla8emin action 1 - o t e etional lectr nded to reed as follows: Section 210-52(t). Basements. For a one-family dwelling at least one receptacle outlet in addition to any provided for laundry equipment shall be lost ailed in each basement. See Sections 210-8(a)(2). ~aca:vn L1V-i9 Navev tlUildln 9 e st one lectrlcal ode s ar new Section 210=54 to read as follows: C 1 3t3 • Section 210-54(a) Buildings accessory to multiple dwelling uses. Garages and carports accessory to multiple dwelling uses shall be prov[ded with at least one receptacle. Garages or carports designed for use by more than one dwelling unit shall be provided with at least one receptacle for each four (4) perking spaces or fraction thereof. Where such garages or carports are separated by walls or partitions so ea to form individual areas serving individual dwelling units, at least one receptacle shell be provided in each individual area. Separated areas shell be wired either on individual dwelling unit meters or on a house meter or meters. Receptacles provided in common-use garages or carports shall be energized from n house meter or meters. When energized from a house meter or meters, the number of receptacles per circuit shall not exceed six end no such circuit shall supply any other outlets. Wiring to ell new or reconstructed, detached accessory buildings shell be Installed underground.in conduit approved for the purpose. gee slso Section 210-5(2). . (b) Buildings accessory to single family dwelling uses. Cnrpor is end garages, accessory to single !emily dwellings or duplexes, shall De wired with a minimum of one grounding type receptacle on a separate 20 amp circuit. Additional receptacle outlets, not exceeding 3, may be installed on the same c:rcu: t. (e) petached garages or carports. Wiring to ell new or reconstructed detached garages or eerports serving residential uses shall be installed underground in minimum 3/4^ raceway from the distribution panel. Laundry receptacles ea required by Section 210-52(t) shell not be construed es meeting the minimum garage or carport recept nclea required by this section. 15.24.000 Section 210-58 Added E ui ant Room ptacles. he National lectricel o e :e amen a by adding ion 210-56 to reed sa follows: Section 210-5&. Equipment room receptacles. A receptacle outlet shall be provided in all equipment rooms, attics and underfloor areas where equipment Is installed to provide e power source for repairs. ,~ 15.24.070 Section 210-58 Added -- Built-in Gas Ovens. The National lac tr:cel o e s hereby amen ed adding action 210-58 to read es follows: ~rY Section 210-58. Built-In gas ovens. A receptacle outlet • shalt be installed to serve each built-in gas oven. The outlet shell be located so that it is accessible without removing the oven. This outlet may be installed on the lighting circuit. --'--•--- ....... ..... .....-.~ nu,c uaov -- ,., nun vuuecs ii red. Section 210-70 o the National Electrical Code is :by emended to read as follows: Section 210-?D(a ). Dwelling uni ta. At least one well switch-controtted lighting outlet shell be Installed in every habitable room; in bathrooms, utlllty rooms, basement, hallways, stairways, garages and at outdoor entrances. At least one lighting outlet shell be installed in each attic, or underfloor space used for storage or containing equipment requiring servicing. Exception No.l: In haDiteDle rooms, other than kitchens, one or more receptacles controlled by a well switch shell be permitted in lieu of lighting outlets. Exepti on No. 2: In hallways, stairways and at outdoor entrances remote, central or automatic control of . lighting is permitted. 15.23.080 Section 210-70(c) Added -- Buildin s Accessor to lin Units. The at onel lectricel Co a is hereby emended idding action 210-70(c) to reed as follows: Section 210-70(c). Buildings accessory to dwelling units. Garages or carports accessory to dwelling units shall De wired with a minimum of one switched light outlet. Garages or carports designed for use by more than one dwelling un(t shall have et least one light outlet for each [our (4) perking spaces or traction thereof. Where garages or carports ere separated by wells or partitions so as to form individual areas serving individual dwelling uni ta, et least one switched lighting outlet shell be provided in each individual area. Separated areas shell be wired on individual dwelling unit meters or on a house meter or meters. Lighting outlets provided in common-use areas shall be energized from a ho0ae meter or maters. Wiring to ell new or re-constructed de tec'ed accessory • buildings shall be installed underground in conduit approved [or the purpose. .ass . 1s. 24.100 Section 22u-ib(a) Amended -- Loads. Section -1 e o the Nations hereby emended to read as follows: 220-10 (a) Ampacity end computed loads. Feeder conductors shall have sufficient empncity to supply the load served. In no case shall the computed load of a feeder De leas than the sum of the loads on the brunch circuits supplied as determined by Psrt A of th[s Article after any applicable demand factors permitted Dy Parts E, C or D hsve been applied nor less then 50 amperes empacity, whichever is greater. sect: on xau-~a or to reed sa follows: s Section 230-43. Wiring methods [or 600 volts or less. Service entrance conductors ehsli be installed to accordance with the applicable requirements of this code covering the type of wiring method ua ed end limited to the following methods: 1. Rigid Metal Conduit E:oeption No. 1 Aluminum conduit shall not be ueed for overhead service entrance raceway. Exept[on No. 2 Aluminum conduit shell not De ueed for underground service raceway. 2. Electrical Metallic Tubing Exec ption No. 1 Electrical metallic tubing shell not be used where supporting or intended to support service drop aft echments. Exca ption No. 2 Electrical metallic tubing shell not De ueed es underground service entrance raceway. 3. Wireways. 4. Susways. s. Auxiliary gutters. E. Algid Non-Metallic Conduit. Exception No. 3 Rigid non-metallic condui+. shell not be ueed for overhead service entrance raceway. T. Cablebue. 8. Mineral Insulated Metal-Sheathed Cable. ~sb ------- ..a, anenuea -- serVi~ sconnectin cane-Location. action 0-7 d o s ectrical Coe s here y emended to read as tolloxs: Section 230-70(d) Gocetion. The service disconnecting means shall be located on the exterior of the building at the nearest sate end readily accessible po[nt to where the service connectors enter the Duilding. Exception No. 1: On buildings of a commercial or industrial type thnt are normally upon during en average business day the service switch, feeder end/or meter may be installed within the building it meeting the requirements of the service utility. Service disconnects, where permitted inside a Duilding, shall be located in a spsce, readily accessible, and ne Wrest the point of entry of the service conductors into the building as possible. ...,un.a m ec~r:cai code ng cell on 230-212 to read as follows: Section 230-212 Service equipment capacity. Service equipment cepscity shell De es follows: 1) Service equipment installed to serve single family • dwellings shall hove a capacity o[ not less then 20 single pole overcurrent protective devices in addition to a mein switch or circuit breaker. a. .: .. '• '_''. sac. L:a siugie family de [ached dwelling unl tai shell be not less then 1 1/2^ size conduit. 2) Service equipment installed to serve commercial or industrial buildings shell have nn empaeity rating to serve the intended load but net less then 80 amperes. Service conduit or feeder raceways shell not be less then 1^ size except thst where service conduit or feeder raceway is concealed, the minimum size raclwey shall be 1-1/4^. 3) Peeders serving individual units of multi-family dwellings shall De installed in not less then 1" size conduit and run from the meter location to e distribution panel within each unit. National lectr 18(c) to read es non Juu-1s1e1 added - Co e s hereby emended M owe 3r7 i. The on 300- • . Section 300-15(c) Spare raceways. For attached or detached single family dwellings, twe (2) three-quarter inch (3/4") spare raceways Lor future use shall be provided for each dwelling unit, one running from the panelboard to an accessible location in the attic and one to an accessible location under the floor. Where either apace, is not available because of method of eonatruction, such termination of spare raceways shall be as approved by the Building Official. Jac axon Jav-aa mte naee -- attanf nimum Conductor Use Restricted. The National Electrical ode is hereby amended by adding action 310-14 to reed ea follows: 310-14 Almninun conductors. (e) Material. Solid aluminum conductors, No. 8, 10 and 12 AWG, shell be made of an M-800 series electrical grade aluminum alloy conductor material. Stranded altmintm conductors, No. 8 ANG through 1000 MCM, marked es type RFBIW, TNW, THWN, TEifffl, service entrance type SE, Style V, end 98, Style A, shall be made of en M-800 series etectricsl grade elumi ntm alloy conductor material. (b) Use restricted. Aluminum conductors, smeller then No. 8 shall not be used for circuit conductors, feeders or subfeeders, unless installed under full-time inspection by e • Special Inspector as a "special case" outlined in Section 308(a)12 of the Uniform Administrative Code as adopted to Chapter 35.08 of this Title. u un JLV-J emenaea - en wtrln on 1 i x x x-x ~-5-. -~ uKV it V,1 JLU-J Vl 111C atltlOnHl aIeC LT t0 read 96 tOIlOWS: Section 320-3 Uses permitted. Open wiring on insulators shell be permitted on systems of 800 volts, nominal, or less for industrial or egrieultural establishments in outdoor locations only. 15.24.170 Section 320-15 Deleted. Section 320-15 of the National Electrical Code is hereby deleted. 15.24.188 Section 338-3(b) Amended T e NMC Cable. Section 3 6- D s hereby amended to rea es ollows: Section 338-3(b ). Type NMC. Type NMC cable shell be permitted: (1) for concealed work in dry, moist, damp or corrosive locations; (2) in outside end inside walls o[ masonry block or tile; (3) in a shallow chase in mesanry, concrete or adobe and covered with plaster, adobe, or similar finish, where embedded in piaster or runs in a shallow chase in masonry walla and covered, NMC cable shell ,,e protected against damage from nails Dy a cover o[ corrosion-resistant steel et Ienst 1/18^ in thickness. 3r8 13.24.190 Section 336-4 Amended -- Uses Not Permitted, Subsection (c) o action 8-3 o the National lectrical Code is hereby amended to reed as follows: ' Section 336-4. Uses not permitted. (s) Type NM or NMC. Types NM and NMC cables shell not be used: (1) in any dwelling structure exceeding three stories above grade; (2) as service-entrance cable; in any commercial or industrial building; (3) in any hazardous location; (4) in hois[ways; (5) in unenclosed locations o[ privets garages or carports; (6) in accessible locations of dwelling units other than circuits or portions of circuits located within end serving an individual dwelling unit; (7) in any area where exposed to mechanical damage or the elements; (8) in underfloor crawl spaces; (9) embedded in poured cement, concrete or aggregate. (b) Type NM. Type NM cable where expaaed to corrosive embedded in masonry, concrete, In a shallow chase in masonry, with plaster, adobe, or similar shall not be installed: (1) fumes or vapors; (2) where adobe, till, or plaster; (3) concrete, or adobe and covered finish. 18.24.200 Section 338-2 Deleted. Seption 338-2 of the National Electrical Code a hereby a eted. n u r 1 LJ ce to read es follows: Section 350-5 Grounding. Flexible metal conduit shall be ..A perm~cced as a gruuuuiua u,u aua ..lieto .~. ~ .-r.- fittings ere approved [or grounding. VVWhere anV equipment bonding )umPer is required around flexlble metal conduit, it shall be installed in accordance with 9ectlon 250-79, Exception No. 1 Plexible metal conduit shall be permitted es a grounding means it the total length in any ground return path is 8 feet (1.83 m) or less, the conduit is terminated in fittings approved for grounding, and the circuit conductors contained therein are protected by overcurrent devices rated et 20 amperes or leas. Exception No. 2 [n dwelling units and in buildings accessory to dwellings, flexible metal conduit may be used for grounding means by the use of fittings which thread into the convolutions of square-cut flexible conduit. 15.24.220 Section 3T0-8(d) Added -- Box Construction -Noncombust ble ter sls Require action .' - o the Netionel Electrical Co a is hereby emended Dy adding subsection (d) es follows: u 7TS • Section 370-0(d). Box construction. Bo:es used in walls required to 6e of tire-resistive construction shall be o[ metal or other approved incombustible materiels. 15.24.230 Articles 550 end 551 Deleted. Articles 550 end 551 o the Net~one lectricel Code ere hereby deleted. r1 LJ 3Go SECTION 10. A new Chapter 15.28 is hereby added to the . Rancho ucemonga Municipal Code, to read in words end figures, as follows: Chapter 15.28 CODE FOR ABATE~ff.NT OF DANGEROUS BUII.DING9 Sections• 15.28.010 Section 103 deleted 15.29.020 Section 201 (c) deleted 15.28.090 15 29 040 Section 203 deleted--Violations and penalties. . . 15.29.050 9ecti on 203 emended--Board of appeets. Sections 208 added-Summery abatement. 15.29.090 Section 901 emended--Demolition procedure. 15.28.070 Section 902 deleted. 15.28.080 Section 901 amended--E:penaes incurred by city in repair or demolition. 15.29.090 Section 902 amended--Council ruling. 15.29.100 Section 903 emended--Objections. 15.29.110 Section 804 amended--Passage. 15.28.010 Section 103 Deleted. Section •103 of said Uniform Code or Abatement o angerous u Idinga is hereby deleted. 15.28.020 Section 201(c) Deleted. Subsection (c) o[ Section • 201 or said Uniform o e or Abatement of Dangerous Buildings is hereby deleted. 15.28.030 Section 203 Dal er.d--v:.,i.•~,,... ..... 3 action 203 of the Un orm o e or the A atement o nDnngerous Buildings is hereby amended by deleting Section 203 [n its entirety. 15.28.040 Section 205 Amended--Board of A eels. Section 205 o t e Uni orm o a or Abatement o Dangerous Buildings is emended to read as tollowa. Section 203. "Board of Appeals" ea used herein shell mean the Board o[ Appeals as set forth in Section 204 of the Uniform ABni nlstretive Code hereby adopted. Appeals to the board shall be processed in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 501 of this code. 15.28.050 Sectl one 208 Added--Summer Abatement. The Uniform Code or Abatement o ^ngerous u ld ngs a emended by adding Sections 206 and 207 to read es tollowa: • 36/ • Section 208(x). Summary abatement. In addition to the procedures provided [or abatement o[ dnngeroua buildin s g as set forth in Chapter 4 of this Code, the Building Official is hereby given summary power to secure from entry any structure or premises which in his discretion he determines to be immediately dnngeroua, or immediately hazardous or in other manner injurious to public health or safety. Such structures may be secured by the Building Official by nailing of boards over the doors and windows of such structure, however, he shell not be limited to only thin method and may use other methods at his discretion to accomplish the same purpose which may be more appropriate under the circumstances. The Building Of [icinl shall also post a sign stating in effect "DANGEROUS BUILDING, DD NOT ENTER": or other appropriate sign upon the structure or premises in et least one conspicuous piece. The Building Official shall immediately upon such action send notice to the owners of the real property upon which the structure or condition is located, sa shown on the lest equalized asseaament rolls. Such notice shall contain the following inf ormatlona 1. That he has secured the structure or corrected the hazardous conditions. 2. The cost incurred by the City thereby. • 3. That he has posted signs ns provided Dy this section. 4. The resaona why he has taken the action. S. That nn eppeel may be made within ten (10) days to the 6. That it his action is not annulled by the City Coundil, the cost of securing the property shell become a lien upon the reel property, unless the cost is paid to the City within thirty ('s 0) days of the mailing of the notice. If any owner of property, or any person having any interest in property affected by the action of the Building Official in securing a structure or abating e hazardous condition as permitted by this section, is aggrieved by the action of the Building Official in securing the structure, such person or persons may appeal the action of the Building Official by [fling s written notice at eppeel with the City Clerk within ten (10) days after receipt of notice of the action Dy the 9uilding Official. The notice of appeal must he verified under oath or under penalty of perJury and must state the grounds upon which the action of the Building Official is appealed. The City Council shell, upon receiving such notice of appeal, hear say evidence or other relevant matters presented by the appellant or the Building Official et its next regular meeting after the [l ling of the notice of eppeel, provided however, 34 i if the notice of appeal is filed less than ten days . prior to the day of a regular meeting of the City Council, the hearing shall not be held et the first regular meeting, but at the following regular meeting. After hearing all evidence and other relevant matters presented at said hearing or without hearing if no appeal is made upon the report of the• Building Official, the City Council may then confirm, emend, or annul the action of the Building Official. If the action o[ the Building Official is annulled, the City, et its own expense, shalt remove any end ell instruments used to secure acid structure, end shell remove any and ell signs stating that the building is unsafe to enter. [f, however, the City Council confirms the action of the Building O[[iciel in securing the structure at the hearing on appeal, or, it no appeal is taken, et any other regular meeting, or adjourned meeting, then the cost incurred bq the City in securing the structure shall became a lien against the property, end a resolution of the City Council confirming the action of the Building Official, including the imposition of a lien upon the property upon which the structure is locsted to pay for the coat of aecur ing It, may De adopted upon•reeeipt of a report from the Building Officisl. Such resolution may be tiled with the San Bernardino County Ta: Assessor, and • the lien imposed thereby may be collected for the City by aim, along with the next annual tax levy end assessment on said property. ,_~ '"`' sa~,a yruueuure, as prov~eee to subsection (e) for abating through securing from entry any structure which is determined by the Building O[fic[al to be immediately dangerous or immediately hazardous may also be used by the Building Official [n connection with the summery abatement of all other dangerous or hazardous conditions upon private property which the Building Official determines, et his discretion, as constituting an Immedistely dangerous or hazardous condition. TAe Bu[Iding Official msy then summarily abate such nuisance, at his discretion, in the most appropriate manner under the circumstances, which may include, Dut shall not be limited to the following methods: fencing, draining water from swimming pools end [i Ming with appropriate ballast, removing fire hazards, fi111ng or covering open holes end geeding or strengthening land [ills or ezcavattona. Although the manner and method used by the Building Official shell be et his discretion, he shall, in making his determinations, seek the moat economical method and endeavor not to place en undue economical hardship upon • the owner of the property, end only use those measures which will eliminate the dangerous end hezardo us features. 3L] . 15.28.080 Section 801 Amended -- Demolition Procedure. Section 80 o the Uni orm Code or Abatement o Dangerous Buildings is hereby amended to read as Follows: Section 801. Procedure. When any work of repair or demolition is to be done pursuant to Section ?O1(c) 0 of this Code, the Building Official shall issue the order therefore and the work shall be accomplished by City personnel or by pr(ve to contract under the direction of the Building Official, or he may employ such architectural and engineering assistance on a contract 6sais es he may deem reasonably necessary. if any part o[ the work is to be accomplished by private contract, standard public works contractual procedures shall be followed. 15.28.070 Section 802 Deleted. The Uniform Code for Abatement o Dangerous Bu:ld:nga is hereby amended by deleting Section 802 in its entirety. =.. .a.= ~~ vanoi:non. aect:on Sul o[ the Uniform Coder the Abatement o Dangerous Buildings is hereby emended to read as follows: Section 901. The Building Official shall keep en itemized • account of the expense incurred by the City in the repair or demolition of any building done pursuant to the provisions of Section 701 (c) 3 of this Code. Upon the completion o[ the work of repair or demolition, the Building Official shell prepare and file with the City Clerk a report specifying the work Anna. thn ~~.m:~.n ..,~ .. .: description of the real property upon which Vthe=building or structure is or was located, and the names end addresses of the persons entitled to notice pursuant to Subsection (c) of Section 401. 15.28.090 Section 902 Amended--Council Rulin Section 902 of the Uni orm Coe or the Abatement o Dangerous Buildings is hereby amended to reed as follows: Section 902. Upon receipt of said report, the City Cterk shell present it to the City Council for consideration. The City Council shall fix a time, date and place for hearing such report, and any protests or objections thereto. The City Clerk shall cease notice of said hearing to be posted upon the property involved, posted as directed Dy the City Council so as to give proper public notice, end served by certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the owner o[ the property es his name and address appears on the test equalized assessment roil of the county, it such so appears, or es known to the Clerk. Such notice shall be given et least ten (10) days prior to the date set for hearing and shall specify the day, hour, end place when the Council will hear and pass upon [he Building Official's report, together J~ Y with any objections or protest which may De tiled as • hereinstter provided by any person Interested in or affected by the proposed charges. 15.28.100 Section 903 Amended--Ob actions. Section 903 of the Uni orm Code or t e Abatement o Dangerous Buildings is hereby emended to reed as follows: Section 903. My person interested in or affected by the proposed charges may file written protests or oDjecti ons with [he City Clerk at any time prior to the time set for the Dearing on the report of the Building Official. Eeeh such protest or objection must contain a de acription of the property in which the signer thereof is interested end the grounds of such protest or objection the date it was received by him. He shall present such protests or objections to the City Councilet the time set foe the hearing, and no other protests or objeetlona shall be considated. 15.28.110 Bectlon 904 Amended--passe e. Bastion 904 of the Uniform o e oe t e atement o angerous Buildings is hereby amended to read es follows: Section 904. Upon the day end hour fl:ed,for the hearing the City Council shall hear end pees upon the report of the Building Official together with any such objections or . protests. The Council may make such revtaion, eorreotion or moditicntlon in the report or the charge as It may deem just; and when the Council is satisfied with the correctness of the charge, the report (ss submitted or •a revised, corrected or modified) together with the charges shall be confirmed nr rejectee. ~rne Decision of the City Council on the report and the charge, end on all protests or object[ons, shall De final end conclusive. • 3~ ~" • 36CTION 11. A new Chapter 15.32 is hereby added to the Rancho Cucsmonge Municipal Code, to read in words and tigurea, es follows: CHAPTER 15.32 HOUSIdO CODE Sections• 15.32.010 Section 104 deleted 15.32.020 Seetton 201 suDaeetion (e) and (b) deleted. 15.32.090 Section 203 emended -- Housing advisory and appeals Board 10.32.040 Seetton 204 deleted -- Violations and penalties 15.32.010 Section 104 deleted. Section 104 of said Uniform Houa ng ode s har• y elate . 15.32.020 Section 20t, Subsection a) and (b) deleted. SuDSect one s an D o ect~°l61 o s• n orm ous ng Code ere hereby deleted. . 15.32.030 Section 203 bosr act on o emended to read as follows: Section 203. "Housing Advisory and Appeals Board" na used Fu .w.ll ~r.. -- :+yyo6ib ae aoi iur 111 111 Section 204 of~^the -Un[[orm yAdministrsttve Code hereby adopted. Appesis to the boned shall be processed in accordance with the provisions contained in Sectior. 1201 of this code. Section 15.32.040 deleted. Section 204 of the Uniform Housing Code s ereby elate . 34L SECTION 12. A new Chapter 15.36 is hereby added to tAe • Rancho Cucemongn Municipal Code, to read in words end figures, as follows: Chapter 15.38 3ixn Code Sections: 15.36.010 Section IOS(d) deleted 16.36.020 Section 303 amended--Sign permits: Exemptions 15.36.030 Chapters S through 12 and Chapter 14 deleted 15.38.020 Section 103 Deleted. Said Uniform Sign Code is emended by elating act on 10 n its entirety. 15.38.030 Section 309 Amended--Si n Permits Ex clone. Sect on o ss n orm gn ode s amends to rea as follows: Section 303. The following work shall not require a sign permit, however, these exemptions shall not be construed as relieving the owner of the sign from the responsibility for its erect[on end maintenance, eompllanee with the provisions • of this Code, the Rlneho Cucamonga Devel opmen[ Code, or any other law or ordinance regulating the same: 1. The changing of the advertising copy or message on e painted or orint~A aion n ~.., ......_.._. faces. ~ .. -- _~ ... _~....... ~. yiuiiic aigu 2. Pointing, repainting or cleaning of an advertising structure provided no structural cA snge is made. 3. Signs Less than 5 feet above grade that are not electrically lighted. 4. Changing o[ theater marquees and similar signs specitically~designed for the use of replaceable copy. Any permit issued for erection o[ a sign in vioietion of this Code or other ordinance is automatically void end shall be cancelled by [he Building Official. -- - .. .,,~~~ n .~ ane cne ter l4 Deleted. Said Uniform Sign Code is here y emends by delet ng Chapters 8, 7, S, 9, 10, 11, 12, end 14 in the[r entireties. • 3G 7 • SECTION 13. A new Chapter 15.40 is hereby added to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, to read in words end figures, as eollows: CHAPTER ls.4o BUII.DINC SECURITY CODE Sections: Section 15.40.010 Section 4101 emended -- Purpose. Section 15.40.020 Section 4102 -- Application. Section 15.40.030 Section 4105 emended -- Door viewers. Section 15.40.040 Section 4108 emended -- Doors and hardware. Section 15.40.050 Section 4107 emended -- Sliding doors. Sect[on 15.40.080 Section 4108 emended -- Windows Section 15.40.070 Section 4108 amended -- Garage vehicular access doors. Section 15.40.080 Section 4110 through 4115 added -- Multiple-fsmlly developments. Section 15.40.010 Seetlon 4101 Amended -- Pur oae. Section 4101 o said n orm u 1 ng ecurity o e s amen a to rend as • follows: Section 4101. Purpose. The purpose of this code is to establish minimum standards to make newly constructed dwelling units end additions to dwelling uni ta, and private ParaPP.a rM iaf anf In nnlPrfu l_ ~nlwn •nA_ •n L..:,:r.~.. protection of property. ~ ~~~~~~- Section 13.40.020 Section 4102 -- A lication. Section 4102 o[ sa Uni orm Bulid ng ecurlty Co e a emended to read as follows: Section 4102. Application. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to openings into dwelling units of Group R, Division 1 Oceupnnciea, Group R, Division 3 Oceupnncies and into geragea of Group M-1 Occupenctea, es defined in the Uniform Building Code, including openings between attached geragea and dwelling units. EXCEPTIONS: I. An opening in en exterior wall when all portions of such openings are more than 12 feet vertically or 8 feet horizontally from en accessible surface of any ad)oining yard, court, peaasgewey, public wsy, breezeway, patio, planter, porch or sirt'~lar area. 3~Y 2. An opening in an exterior wall when all portions of . such openings are more than 12 feet vertically or B feet horizontally from the surface of any adjoining root, balcony, lending, stair treed, platform or similar structure or when any portion of such surface is itself more then 12 teat above an eccessiDte surface. 3. Open[ngs where the smeller dimension is 8 inches or less, provided that the closest edge of such openings is at least 40 inches from the locking device of the door or window easemDly. 4. Openings protected by required fire door assemblies having a fire endursnee rating of not less then 45 minutes. 15.40.030 Section 4105 emended -- Door Viewers. Section 4105 o satd Un orm u 1 ng eeurtty Code la amends to read ea follows: 9ectlon 4105. All main or front entry doors to dwelling units shell De arranged so that tha occupant hea a view of the area lmmediataly outside the door without opening the door. Except ae provided in Section 9305 (h) of the Uniform Building Code, such view may De provided by a door viewer • having a field of view of not leas than 180 degrees, through windows or through view ports. 15.40.840 Section 4108 emended -- Doors and Hardware. Seat On 1 n tha ^n arm n,l .• read es follows: -~ ~ ------+ ---~ .. ~......-.. .. Section 4106 (a). Doors and Hnrdwsre. Swinging pedestrian doors and their hardware regulated by this chapter shall comply with UBC Standard No. 41-1, Part [ or equivalent standard. Doors sad hardware shall be installed as Leafed. EXCEPTION8: Doors and herdwsre fabricated and installed as set forth in BuDsections (b) through (i) below. (b). Door construction. Such doors shall De of soii6 construction with a minimum thickness of one end three- quarters Inches (i-3!4") except for recessed panels which may be not less then alas-sixteenths Inches (8/18") thickness. C~ J 3c 9 • (e). Locking devices. Such doors shell be equipped with a double or single cylinder deadbolt lock. The bolt shall have a minimum projection of one inch (I") and be constructed so as to repel cutting tool attack. The deadbolt shell have en embedment of at least three-fourths inch (3/4") into the strike receiving the projected bolt. The cylinder shell have a cylinder guard, a minimum of five (5) pin tumblers, end shall be connected to the inner portion of the beck Dy connecting screws of at least one-fourth inch (1/4") in diameter. A duel locking mechanism constructed so that both deadbolt and leteh can De retracted by a single action of the inside door knob, or lever, may be substituted provided it meets all other specifications for locking devices. (d). Insetive leaves. Inactive leaves o[ double doors shall be equipped with metal flush bolts et top and bottom having e minimum crone-sectional dimension of one-halt inch (1/2") end a minimum embedment o[ five-eighths inches (5/8") into the head and threshold of the frame. (el. Blocking. In wood framing, horizontal blocking shell De placed between studs at door lock height toe three (3) stud spaces each side of the door openings. Any spaces between jambs end trimmers end edj oining studs shalt be shimmed sold. • (t). Stops. Door stops or wooden jambs for in-swinging doors shell be of one pleca construction with the jamb. Jambs for ell doors shall be constructed or protected so es to prevent violation o[ the strike. (gi. ule2ing. Glazing in exterior doors within forty (40") inches of any IocKing mechanism shalt be of fully tempered glass or burglary resistant glazing, except when double cyclinder deadbolt locks are installed. (h). Strike plate installation. in wood frame construction any open space between trimmers and wood door jambs shell be solid shimmed Dy a single piece extending not leas then 6 inches above and below the strike plate. Strike plates shell be attached to wood with not less than two No. 8 z 2" screws. Ati strike plates of doors in pairs shell De installed as tested. (i). Hinges. Hinges which are exposed to the exterior shall be equipped with non-removable hinge pins or a mechanical interlock to preclude removal of the door tram the exterior by removing the hinge pins. 15.40.050 Section 4107 Amended -- Slidin do rs. Section 4107 0 [he Uni orm Building ten sr Coe is emended to read as follows: 37D Section 410?. Sliding doors. Sliding Door assemblies • regulated by this chapter shall comply with UBC Standard 41- 1, Part lI or equivalent standard. 15.24.080 Section 4108 Amended -- Windows. 3ecti on 4108 of the Uni orm Buil :ng 3ecuri ty Code is emended to read es follows: Section 4108. Windows. Window assemblies which ere designed to De openeble end which ere regulated by this CAapter shall comply with UBC Standard 41-2 unless such windows ere protected Dy approved metal bars, screens or grilles. to read as toltowa: Section 4109(a). Geroge vehicular access doors. Rolling overAeed, solid overhead, swinging/sliding or accordion doors provided for vehicular access to private garages shall be constructed end inatslled es set forth in this section. (D). Such doors shall be provided with nn exterior eovertng of one of the following: t. Exterior grade plywood not less than five- • sixteenths inches (5/18") in thickness. 2. Aluminum not less then tour-hundredths inches (.04^) in thickness. 3. Steel not less then three-hundredths inches (.04") in thickness. 4. Fiberglass having a density of not less then five ounces (5 oz.) per square foot. 5. Wood siding not less than nine-sixteenths inches (9/18") to thickness. Section 4109 (c ).~ Locking devices. All locking devices utilizing a cylinder lock shall have a minimum [ive (8) pin tumbler operntlon wt th the locking Dar or bolt extending into the receiving guide a minimum of one inch (1"). 91ide bolt type locking assemblies shell have a bolt diameter of not less then theca-elghtha inch (3/8^). Slide Dolts shalt penetrate the receiving guide not less then one and one-halt inches (1-1/2^) end shell be sttached with three ($) bolts that ere not removable from the outside. Rivets shell not be used to attach slide bolt easemDl[es. Doors exceeding sixteen feet (18') in width shall be provided • with opposlie, centrally located locking points, either et each side or at top and bottom of the door. 37/ • EXCEPTIONS: 1. For doors nineteen feet (19') or less in width, a single locking point may be used if centrally located et the floor or top of the door. 2. Doors provided with torsion spring counter-balance type hardware. (d). Frames. Prames for garage vehicle access doors shall be constructed of one of the following: 1. Aluminum not less than twelve-hundredths inches (.12^) in thickness. 2. Steel not less than six-hundredths inches (.O6^) in thickness. 3. Wood not less than one and one-halt inches (1-1/2") to thickness. 15.40.080 Section 4110 throw h 4115 Added -- Multi le Pemil Develo nts. he n orm uil :ng ecur ty ode le amended by adding act ons 4110 through 4115 to read sa follows: • Section 41 I0. Complex diagram. There shall be positioned at each entrnnce of a multiple-family development, en illuminated diagremnstic representation of the complex which shows the location of the viewer and the unit designations and Iocntions within the complex. Section 4111. Lighting Lighting in multiple-family dwellings shell be as follows: Aisles, passngeways and recesses related to and within the building complex shall be illuminated with en intenai ty o[ at least twenty-five one-hundredths (.25) [ootcendles et the ground level during the hours o[ darkness. Lighting devices shell be protected by vandal-resistant covers. Open parking lots and carports shall be provided with e minimum of one (1) tootcendle of light on the parking surface during the hours of darkness. Lighting devices she L1 be protected by vandal resistant covers. Section 4112. Keying. Upon occupancy, each dwelling unit in e subdivision or multiple-family development shell have locks using keys that ere not Interchengenbie with any other dwelling unit in the subdivision or multiple-family development. Section 4115. Definitions. 37 3- 1. "Burglary Resistant Glazing" means those materials es defined in Underwriters Laboratory Bulletin 872. 2. "Double Cylinder Deadbolt" means a dendDoit lock which can be activated only by key on both the interior and the exterior sides. 3. "Door Stop^ means the projection along tAe top and sides of a door Jemo which ehecka the door's swinging action. 4. "Dwelling" meena a building or portion thereof designed exclusively for residential occupancy, including single-family dwellings. 5. "Plushbolt" is a manusl, key or turn operated metal Dolt normally used on innetive door(s) end is attached to the top end bottom of the door end engages in the Dead end threshold of the Creme. 8. "Single Cylinder Deadbolt" means a deadbolt lock which is salivated from the outslda by a key and from the inside Dy s knob, thumb-turn, lever, or similae mechanism. SECCION 14: • The Mayor shell sign this Ordinance end the City Clerk shell cause the same to be publtshed within fifteen (IS) days after its passage at least once in The Dailv Report. a newaoaoer er o.n.rsl circulation published In ttie t~~9T~~ntnrlo,California, and circulated In the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PA33ED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1987. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ennia tout, yor ATTEST: • Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk 3 73 -_- -. ... .~ vuwvwvn STAFF REPORT GATE: Aprtl 15, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer By: Paui A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer i'~UnK?~h ~?~r~, ~~ x, ~ y . $, io-- SUBJECT: Amendment of the speed limit section of the Municipal Code establishing a speed 1/m1L on Center Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Church Street; on Levan Avenue from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue; on Spruce Avenue from Elm Avenue to Base Line Raad; on Turner Avenue from Footh/11 Boulevard to Base Line and on Yictoria Nindrows Loops (north and south) RECQNEIDATION: It is recapmmnded that the Ctty Coundl adopt the attached Ordinance amending Section 10.20.020 of the Municipal Code to establish speed limits as follows: On Center Avenue, iras Foothill Boulevard to Church Street, 40 mph; On Lean Avenue, from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue, 40 mph; On Spruce Avenue, from Elm Avenue to Bese Line Road, 10 mph; On Turner Avenue, from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road, 45 mph; On Ylctorla Ntndrows loops (north and south), 35 mph. These streets have been the subject of engineering and traffic surveys as prescribed 1n the Vehicle Code. These surveys included such peps as residential frontage review, street grades, accident hl story and radar surveillance of prevailing speeds. The street sections presented here are currently unposted, making enforcement of speeds lass than 55 mph difficult. The proposed speed limits recognize increased deveiopment or, 1n some cases, newly developed streets, and will enable effective enforcement without creating an unreasonably high number of violators. Respec Dmltted, RHN~: • Attachments :~ 37y n ----- i 1 1 1 1 1 1 u~ t~ ~j i~ x~ F~ I 1 1 " I ' 1 1 1 I_ J ~-- •, ,;~r a~ ° ~ ~ s ~ III ~~~~ ~ ~o e~ ~ 0 x W 1 t f W ~~, ~; ~~ ---~ -- __ ;~ e s~ ~ ~ ~ •< ~~g~ ~~ 'II ~ LL ~ a~ ~~a ~--,r---t-, W ~. S 37~ r~ ~~ 0 377 • ORDINANCE N0. ,}3/3 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANDN611, CALIFORNIA, SECTION 10.20.020 OF Tiff RANCHO CUCAMONDII, CITY CODE RE6ARDIN6 PRAM FACE SPEED LINITS UPON CERTAIN CITY STREETS A. Recitals • (i) California Vehicle Code Section 22357 provides that this City Council swy, Dy ordinaroe, set prises facie speed limits upon any poKion of any street rata state hlghwgy. (11) The City Traffic Engineer has conducted an engineering and traffic survey, of certain streets within the City of Rancho Cucamonga which streets arc specified in Part B of this Ordinance. (111) The determinations concerning prim facie speed 1lnits set forth 1n Part B, below, are Wsed upon the engineering and Lrafflc survey identified in Section A (11 ), above. B. Ordinance NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNDA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLONS: Section 1 Section 10.20.020 hereby 1s mended to the Rancho Cucamonga City Code to read, in words and figures, as follows: 10.20.020 Decrease of state law naxinia s d. It is determined by City Counc reso u on a upon ass o an engineering and traffic investigation tMt the speed permitted by state law 1f greater than Ts reasonable or Safe under the conditions found to exist upon suth streets, and it 1s declared that the prism facie speed linlt shall De as set forth to this section on those streets or parts of streets designated in this section when signs arc erected giving notice thereof: Nave of Street or PorLlon Affected 1. Archibald Avenue--Fourth Street t0 Banyan Street 2. Arrow Route--Baker to Haven 3. Haven Avenue--H1 h1arM to Wit son 4. Hellnan Avenue--Foothill to Alta Lana Or. Declared Pr1na Facie Speed Linit (MPH) 45 45 50 35 .~7P OBOttUNCE N0. ADri1 15, 1981 Page 2 5. 6. 7 8 9 10. 11. 12. 13. 14 15. 16. 11. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22 Hellnan Avenur-5th to ~ oflManzanita Hettaan Avenue--5~ n Be yjl 5tre ~~, north of Leew to BanY an to Beryl St ao~dB-aij st citYnlledt Base L/nc Carnelian to Naves to Carnetlaoad-- Base Line t-.Foote Haven end e11an Stree N/gh E19 ~ 5 ~v~ue--Footh111 ~ Archibald Foo Ni9hlandQ v~ EEigh>~ ~ Footh111 Grove A Tur h~~ vStr~iet..l9than L ~~h1re ~va~~ .Choy ~ ~aeasttne 23. 24. 25. 26. 21. 28. 29. `' ~ 30. 31. 32. ~~ 33. 34. ~u Vicforia(Pa L~fr~an Nast c1tY ltnlts to B~;°eaat~ Archibald .. onad--fry Ranch bate to Nili>~•w •" ue A~eethYSt~~i tfroa Archibald AVeo Church 5 Ue erd Avenue to Haven Aven frog VineY San Bernardino Road-- EtiNanda Avenue to Archibald Avenue Victoria Avenur- fr~oa Archibald Avenue tp Route 15 H19h1and Avenur- sa Avenue to ~ sa Avenue 800'1 ~ t of Hav ~ Bth~ t. Lo Foothill Boulty rA Blvd. to Center Avenur-F~th{11 Lh~ avenue--Archibald Avanue W Naves Avenue E1i Avenue to Base Unee0.oad turner Avenue'-Foothill Boulevard to indro'!s LpOP (north 8 south) Base Line Road Victor/a M artl. 1982: gaucho Cucaawn9ao5~82 (124 ' r 1 LJ 45 40 40 45 45 40 45 45 45 35 40 45 40 45 ao 40 35 40 35 40 35 40 35 45 45 40 40 • 45 35 Ord. 19 Section 5.1, 19781 3~9 ORDINANCE N0. April 15, 1987 Page 3 • (i) Both sixty-five (65) n11es per hour and fifty-five (55) wiles per hour arc speeds which arc wore than arc reasonable or safe; (fit TM n11es per hour as stated are tM Arlen facie speeds which are host appropriate to facilitate tM orderly noveweM of traffic and arc speed liwlts which arc reasonable and safe on said streets or portions thereof; (tit) The wiles per hour stated are Mreby declared to be tM priwa facie speed ltwlts on said streets; and (iv) TM Traffic Engineer 1s Mreby authorized and directed to install appropriate signs upon said streets giving notice of tM prlwa facie speed liwit declared Mrc1n. Section 2 TM City Clerk sMli certify to tM passage of this Ordinance and shall cause tM swe to be published as reWlred by law. TM Mayor sMll sign this Ordinance and ~tM City Clerk sMll cause • tM sane to De published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in TM Da11y Report, a newspaper of general clrcualttan published in tM City of Omar oi -~Tfiarnia, and circulated 1n the City of Ranch Cucaiwnga, California. f~~ ado i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM GATE: Rpril 15, 1987 TO City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer {~~' BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician ~u ~L` ~ a.. \'.i z FI ~ Z 19-~i SUBJECT: Tract 11997 -Southwest corner of Hillside Avenue and Beryl Street Tract 11997 was pulled fron the April 1, 1987 council agenda since the instrunent of credit guarsMeefng performance of the required improvements accempanying the map did not meet the C1ty Attorney's approval. The Tract map was submitted with instruments of credit as a surety. According to Paragraph (3) of Section 66499 of the Subdivision Map pct the financial institution issuing the tnstruaents must be regulated by the State or Federal Governllmlt. The instruments of credit submitted with Tract 11997 were issued by Nevada Savings and Loan Association which is not regulated by the State of California or Lhe Federal Government. RHM:LB:dlw ~J 38I ntmv nc n ~ r.rn vn rn rn . •Rn vn . C~ STAFF REPORT DATE: April 1, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician GV tw. IQ~ Y FBI 19" SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 11991 located on the southeast corner of 8ery1 Avenue and Hil)sf de Road, submitted by Nordic Development RECaMOiixrta • It is recaamended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract 11997, accepting the subJect agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record, ANALYSISJBACKf,R01ND Tract 11497 located on the southeast corner of Beryl Avenue and Hillside Road, to the very low Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on October 16, 1983, for the division of 9. T5 acres into 19 lots. The Developer, Nordic Development, is sutmitti^; ~r nyreement and security to guarantee the con~tr_~ctio„ ui zne otf-sfte improvements in the following Jun ie: Faithful Performance Bond: 5379,000 Labor and Material Bond: 5189,SOD Cnpi es of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school distracts and Cucamonga County Water District. C.C.6R.`s have also been approved by the City Attorney. Resp idly submitted, .- i h ~ '~G ~ ~ Lam- `~'. RHM, CB',;dler~ Attachments 38'~ TRACT NO. 11997 N rl/1 CT' w •.fCMO eec.roef• • flf A i1pAN s . rN11N a If Nfl I/i f I/11. lNt N, (NItA AFSIIN a11[InIIE l ua, a n/ rta ftaN/ u w/ f Ms, MQ N, EteE61! iN [MNN <Nllsx, sNlf a uem. r r ~. ~' e `~S, a 3' $' ~. ~; i -# - ~ >~nus~ ~ B4NYAN 57REET- , } V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGDJEERIIdt3 DIVISION M!T MO: afe,R. W ..Atle .CMS : ..,, e i ~ ~ N.N ,. r IB ; ~~ x x 1~Q '- Q N..,.. ; _ N .~•~/~&. TRAC7 i X997 err: 3!~ • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON6A IMPROYEMEMT A6AEEMEN7 FOR TRACT 11997 KNON All MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the Drovisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and of the applicable Ordinances of the City of Rantho Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation, by and between said City, hereinafter referred to as the City, and Nordic Development hereinafter referred to as the Developer. MITNESSETH: THAT, NHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain real property in said City as shown on the conditionally approved subdivision known as Tract 11997; and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by said Developer as Drerequisite to approval of said subdivision generally located on the southeast corner of Hillside Road and Beryl Street NOw, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by said City and by said Developer as follows: . 1. the Developer hereby agrees to construct at Developer's expense all improvements described on Page 6 hereof within twelve months from the effective date hereof. 2. This agreement shall be effective on the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this aareanent rti;~ an~namnn• ~~.,n ._ ._ default on the day following the first anniversary date of said approval unless an extension of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provided. 3. The Developer may request an extension of time to camp lete the terms hereof. Such request Shall be submitted to the City in writing not less than 30 days before the expfration date hereof, and shall contain a statement of circumstances necessitating the extension of time. The City shall have the right to review the provisions of this agreement, including the construction standards, cost estimate, and improvement security, and to require ad,Justmen is therein if any substantial change has occurred during the term hereof. 4. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provisions to be met by any lawful means, and thereupon recover frgm the Developer and/or his surety the full cost and expense incurred. 5. The Oeveloper shall provide metered water service td each lot of said development to accordance with the regulations, schedules, and fees of the Cucamonga County Hater Dtstritt. 280 No. Benson, Ste 6 Upland, CA y1J86 3+Y 6. The Developer Shall be responsible for replacement, relocation, or removal Of any component of any irrigation water system in conflict with • construction of required improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of such water system. 7. Improvements required to be constructed shall conform to the Standard Drawings and Standard Specifications of the City, and to the Improvement Pian approved by and on file in the office of the City Engineer. Said improvements are tabulated an the Construction and fond Estimate, hereby incorporated on page 6 hereof, as taken free the improvement plans listed thereon by number. The Developer shall also be responsible for construction of any transitions or other incidental work beyond the tract boundaries as needed for safety and proper surface drainage. Errors or omnissions discovered during constructin shall be corrected upon the direction of the City Engineer. Revised work due to said plan modifications shall be covered by the provisions of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original planned works. 8. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of work; all regulations listed thereon shall he observed, with attention given to safety procedures, control of dust, noise, or other nuisance to the area, and to proper notification of public utilities and City Departments. Failure to coagly with this sett ton shall be subJect to the penalties provided therefor. 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rocks and other debris from public rights-of-way within or adJoining said development • resulting from work relative to said development. lo. work done within existing streets shall De diligently pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to complete any and all work in the event of unJustified delay in completion, and to recover all cost and expense incurred from the Developer and/or hic rnn~r,~rp. ~~ ;,,-,~ luwfv; nKens. 11. Said Developer shall at all times following dedication of the streets and easements in said subidivision, up to the completion and acceptance of said work or improvement by said City Council, give good and adequate warning to the traveling public of each and every dangerous condition existent in said street or easement, and will protect the traveling public from such defective or dangerous conditions. Unt11 the completion of all Improvements, hereto incorporated on Page 7 to 6e performed, each of said streets not accepted as improvements shall 6e under the charge of said Developer. Said Developer may close all or a portion of any street subJect to the conditions contained in a temporary street closure permit, issued by the City Engineer, whenever it is necessary to Drotect the public during the construction of the improvements herein agreed to be made. i2. Parkway trees required to be planted shalt be planted 6y the Developer after other improvement work, grading and cleanup has been completed. Planting shall be done as provided by Ordinance in accordance with the planting diagram approved by the City Community Development Director. • 3d~ • The Developer shall be responsible for maintaining all trees planted in good health until the end of the guaranteed maintenance period, or for one year after planting, whichever is later, 13. The Developer is responsible for meeting all conditions established by the City pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, City Ordiances, and this agreement for the development, and for the maintenance of all improvements constructed thereunder until the improvement is accepted for maintenance by the City, and no improvement security prov lded here inwith shall be released before such acceptance unless otherwise provided and authorized by the City Council of the City. 14. This agreement shall not terminate until the maintenance guarantee security herefnafter described has been released by the City, or until a new agreement together with the required improvement security has been submitted to the City by a successor to the herein named, and by resolution of the City Council same has been accepted, aM this agreement and the improvement securf ty therefor has been released. 15. The improvement Security to be furnished by the Developer with this agreement shall consist of the following and shall be in a forn acceptable by the City Attorney: A. To secure faithful performance of this agreement. 1. A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate • sureties in the form and content spec if led by Government Code SecLlon 66499.1, 2. An Improvement Security Instrument in the form and content specified by the City Attorney. 3. A deposit with the City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind annmy~A Fnr e_ .i.... ~~..... u. _e B. To secure laborers and materialmen: V yyV ~~~ .w. ~~~ 1. A bond or bonds by one ar more duly authorized corporate sureties in the forn and content specified by Goverrmw!nt Code Section 66499.2. 2. An Improvement Security Instrument in the form and content specified by the City Attorney. 3. A deposit with City of money or negotiable bands of the kind approved for securing C. A cash deposit with the City to guarantee payment by the Developer to the engineer or surveyor whose certificate appears upon the Final Map for the setting of all boundary, lot corner, and street centerlfne monuments and for furnishing centerline tie notes to the City. The amount of the deposit may be any amount certified by Me engineer or surveyor as acceptable payment in full; or, if no value is submitted, the cash bond 3ha11 be as shown on the Construction and Bond Estimate contained hereto, Said cash deposit may be refunded as soon as procedure permits after receipt by the City of the centerline tie notes and written assurance of payment in full from the engineer or surveyor. 3 A~ D. The required bonds and the principal amounts thereof are set forth on • page 6 of this agreement. 16. The Developer warrants that the improvements described in this agreement shall be free from defects in materials and workmanship. Any and all Dort ions of the improvements found to be defettfve within one (1) year foliowing the data on whlcA the improvements are accepted by the City shall be repaired or replaced by Developer free of all charges to the City. The Developer shall furnish a maintenance guarantee security in a sum equal to ten torsecurelthe faithful performance of iDeveeloperss0obl~gationseasrdesc9lbedein Lh1s paragraph. The maintenance guarantee securfty shall also secure the fafthful performance by the Developer of any obligation of the Developer to do spec ifted work w1tA respect to any parkway maintenance assessment district. Once the improvements have been accepted and a maintenance guarantee security has been accepted by the City, the other improvement security described in this agreement nwy be released provided that such release is otherwise authorized by the subdivision Nap Act and any applicable City Ordinance. 17. That the Developer shall take out and maintain such public liability and property damage insurance as shall protect him and any contractor or subcontractor perforning work covered by this agreement tram clataa for property damages which may arise because of the nature of the work or from anyrcontractoreorLsuDcoot aeator, oreaniyone di ecDtlraoroindirectlhimself or by said persons, even thougA such damages be not caused by the negllgenceoo~the Developer or any contractor or subcontractor or anyone employed by said • persons. The publfc liability and property damage insurance shall list the City as additonal insured and directly protect the City, its officers, agents and employees, as well as the Developer, his contractors and his subcontractors, and all insurance polic{es fssued hereunder etiair _.,_, ._._... TA.. .-:-1_._ . •••- ,~~.~~~~.µ~: e~wwii.a ur sucn insurance shall be as follows: ~~~~ A. Contractor's liability insurance providing bodily Tn~ury or death liability limits of not less than f500,000 for each person and iab~it~ limitse of not iless than 5250,O00~forndeach Dact~dent~aor occurrence with an aggregate limit of 5500,000 for claims which may arise from the operations of the Developer fn the performance of the work herein provided. B. Automobile liability insurance covering all vehicles used in the performance of this agreement providing bodily in,Jury liability limits of not less than 5500,000 for each person and 51,000,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage 17aDtlity limits of not less than f250,000 for each accident or occurrence, with an aggregate of not less than 5500,000 which may arise from the opera- tions of the Developer or hfs Contractor In performing the work provided for herein. • 3d7 • 18. That be/ore the execution of this agreement, the Developer shall file with the City a certificate or certificates of insurance covering the specified insurance. Each such certificate shall bear an endorsement precluding the cancellations, or reduction in coverage of any policy evidences by such certificate, before the expiration of thirty (30) days after the City shall have received notification by registered mail from the insurance carrier. As evidence of urwlerstanding the provisions contained herein, and of intent to comply with Same, the Subdivider has submitted the following described improvement security, and has affixed his signature hereto: 5 3Pd TYPe: ~, ~ Name and address of surety: FAITNFUt PERFORMANCE Principal Amount: E379,000 M11TER[Al AIp LABOR PATIENT Type: Principal Amount: Name and address of surety: CASH DEPOSIT M1INNENTATION Stab of Catilo~ia _1 County of Oranges-1~ ~~ ~ CMRVF~AN EEKNOUi ~ NoMry tLbNCCalllamy OnANOE COUNiv MY ~.an E.a Fab 11, 1a9a 1 Cry Po Hn19p119~a rvm, daiNa CA o•: ai, E189,500 On mb tM 39th,o1 August 86 -~_ tY_, Mfon rrN, CARRY VAN EERHOUT IM uMMipnw Notary PuDllc, Mrwnatlyappwaa HARRI J. RETO W pNaonally known to rM ' ~ Prowdlo maontM bnla of wtlalaetoryrwWanca to M IM MnoMp wM naacubtl iM wllhin (MiNmNlt w Sr. Tr ~_ oronbMall ollMc Hamad, and aCknow orPOrallon thabin NApw to ma tM1 tM aorPOnlbn aaaculw 11. WI?NESS my hwd and ollkial NV..... . 1 rat ~~ \1 .. Notary's SiynaWn '-~ .~..._._.. _. _. _ ...w ___~ _ __ rura4.a rarun.Ybu.rwl, • m.t wMO. w,r . Iwawa^a wM, u a ~ ]a I cN s wriaw a. .w... I....q.. ,,,, ,,<„ No1NY'~nalura C ~urmwaeoa„ebr thou nrpp. n.rpn.a.grubluocl.rroF. tJOU vwn~.,awa .weeaw.w,. a.ls, SieMrN L. f'INLNI Accepted: City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation By: Attest: Approved: Mayor City Clerk City Attorney OEYELOPER'S S[fNATURE MIST [IE NOTARIZED ANO COIB'LETED IN TRiPIICATE 3d clrr of RANCHO tucAllDNSA E1IGINEERIR6 DIVISION ENCROACINIFAIT PERMIT FEE SCNEDIN.E • For Improvement: Date: 7-DB- File Re erT ence: n ty NOTE: Does cot include current fee for wrttieg peMt or paremant deposits r1 U ~J _ QUANTITY UN [T ITEM PRICE AMOUNT L.F. P.C.C. curb - 8' C.F. 24' gutter 6.00 L.F. A.C. berm 4.50 S.F. Drive aDProach 2.50 S.F. Preparation of su6yrode 0.15 S.F. Crushed agg. base (per inch thick) 0.03 TON A.C. (500 to 900 tons) 45.00 S.F. 0.01' thick A.C. overlay 0.30 EA. Ad3ust sewer manhole to grade 250.00 EA. Adlust ester valves to grade 75.00 EA. Street lights (5800 Lumen) 1000.00 S.F. Removal of A.C. pavement 0.35 L.F. Removal of R.C. bens 1.00 EA. Strut signs 200.00 L.F. Concrete block w11 (Htllside)• 25.00 C.Y. Contrite collar 400.00 L.f. 24' RCP (1500 D) 35.00 EA. Catch basin N • 5' 3000.00 EA. Local depression 17' 1500.00 EA. Outlet structure 4000.00 L.F. Sawtut 2.00 L.F. Hillside Eq. Trail 25.00 S.F. Landscaping 6 irrigation 2.75 L.F. Utility Underyrounding 150.00 EA. Street Treet (330' Spacing) 75.00 ENGINEERING INSPECTION FEE 15 785 SUB TOTAL •RESTORAT IpI/DELINEATION LASH ~ 0~ CONTINGENCY COSTS 343 096 (lOf) 34~35$- DEPOSIT (REFUNDABLE) FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND (100f) 3T~3S1 MONUMENTATION SURETY (CASH) 2.150 LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND (50f) T •Purswnt to City o1 Raneb Cuwomga Muetcipal CaM, Title [, CNpter 1.OB, adopting San BerMrdlno County Code Titles, Chapters 1-5, a uaN restoration/deltneattan deposit still be erode prior to lsswnu of as Eegteeerte9 ConstrYCtlon Permit. Revised 3/84 35 ° SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE fq PERFORMANCE (SEttTN6 OF FINAL lpIRRENTS} City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucanonga, California 41730 Gentlemen: Pursuant to Chapter 4, Article 9, Section 66497 of the fwvernment Code, the undersigned hereby agrees that all monuments shown on the final map of Tract 11997 are to be set and furnished by the subdivider's engineer or Surveyor on ar before September 1987, as specified in the Engineer's or Surveyor s Certificate and agrees to furnish the notes thereon to complete all engineering requirements specified in Section 66497, of the Government Code. The undersigned hands you herewith the sum of f2, 150 (Receipt Mo. ) as a cash deposit, said deposit to guarantee that the monuments witl~6e sef'and the notes furnished as above provided en or before the date specified and that the engineer or surveyor will be paid by the undersigned. It is further understood arM agreed that in the event the undersigned fails to complete the above requirements within the time specified, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to complete said requfrenRnts or cause them to be completed and the cast thereof is to be a charge against said cash deposit, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorised to make the necessary transfer from said cash deposit to the credit for the proper Cf ty fund. It is further agreed that if the undersigired does not present evidence to the City Council that he has paid the engineer or Surveyor for the Setting of the final monuments, and if the emgtneer or surveyor gives the notirec p,escribed in Section 66497 of the. Government Cade, the f.+F; ;;,Qii pay to said engineer or surveyor, the cash deposit hoses^,~,wae. !f Ua cost of completing said requirements exceeds the amount of the cash deposit, the undersigned agrees [o pay the difference with to thirty (30) days after receiving written statement from the Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga specifying the amount of the difference between the cash deposit and the actual cast of said requirements. Cordially, ~+_-~ ~ ^-~= /T~~x~ Subdivider 1900 i3M+C of pm pucw ~pw-~QI, ~"iz ~,,~c~,~. Address G7fM7FE i_~~~i~6 _ Date _ ~ _flc6ust~~(ii6 The depositer of record (for return of any portion of the cash deposit) shall be "ti"w~ vC Name rest NOTE: TD BE SU81IttED FULLT FILLED OUT AND SI6NED IN TRIPLICATE 35 ~ G S9T 0 P .~ ~ ~ V RvE N~ ARLENE ECI(MART V.cp Pnyyrtl ant December 19, 1986 NEVADA SAVINGS •NO 104N .\yyOCl.,\iON City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Base Line, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 (FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE) Irrevocable quthortty to Pay Tract No. 11997 A09-23804-9(1) Gentleman: At the request and for the account of Nordic Development Company, we hereby estaDl tsh 1n your favor our Irrevocable Authority to Pay A 09-23804-9(1) in the amount of ;379,000. This Irrevocable Authority to Pay is available against your sight drafts drawn on Nevada Savings and Loan Association, Las Vegas, Mevada, ;IIJ tl~~uwpuuieu by your ieccer certitying that the City of Rancho Cucamonga is entitled under Its agreement with Nordic Development relating to construction of offsite improvements. Sold certlftcation shall be final and binding on the right of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to so draw. The amount available under this Irrevocable Authority to Pay A09-23804.9(1) will be reduced from tune to time to the extent of payment of your drafts or upon your written authority drawn hereunder and upon your request, upon receiving from you a letter certifying the amount by which this Irrevocable Authorf ty to Pay A09-23804-9(1) is to be reduced, and the amount that will be available hereunder after such reduction. This Irrevocable Authority to pay ezpi res on the 7th day of August, .988, .n Che Uni[ed States of America. ~. ~ "~~!~ 1 li. n~t~n ~ ~.~ ~ ^!xr InG lInOA., ~I~vG~ix POlyS tlnl, Inlnpxnn~linil Jn75[RG 39 1 City of Rancho Cucamonga December 19, 1986 • Page 2 we hereby undertake that your drafts, when drawn under the terms and conditions of this Irrevocable Authority to Pay, will be tluly honored by us upon presentation. Please ensure that all drafts bear a reference to our Irrevocable Authority to Pay A09-23804-9(1). Very truly yours, NEVADA SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION ' / 1 Ar ene Ec klia rt, Vice~re s~ident • STATE OF NEVADA ) SS. COUNTY DP LLAP.K ; On December 19 1986 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and or said County and Slate, personally appeared ARLENE ECKNART. proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to De the person who executed the wfthin instrument ae VICE DRESI- DENT of NEVADA SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION ~e(~d acknowledged to • me that she executed the within instruments 1. ~ ~w ~ak-~Me pr N'Ret ary's S19nature~~~i~ /~/~~ CUgK COUNTY ~l~~ ' rraero~wruvwrw,wd~ylaV 39? • G Sqr m to s ~ a QxE NOv AR~ENE ECwHAgT v~u w.nia.~t December 19, 1986 NEVADA SAVINGS weo www waneuwn ow City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Base Ltne, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 (LABOR AND MATERIALS) [rrevocaDle Authority to Pay No. 09-23804-9 /09-23804-9(2) Gentleman: At the request and for the account oP Nord lc Development Company, we hereby establish in your favor our Irrevocable Authority to Pay J09-23804-9(2) in the amount of (189,500. This Irrevocable Authorf ty to Pay is available against your sight drafts drawn on Nevada Savings and Loan association, Las Ye9as, Nevada, and a~~n .~i.w Cy ~~~,- 1ct 2i Cci Li Ty my ii~aC the tl[y of Rancho Cucamonga T~is entitled under its agreement with Nordic Development relating to construe lion of offsite improvements. Said certification shall be final and binding on the right of the City of RancAO Cucamonga to se draw. The amount available under this Irrevocable Authority to Pay M09-23804-9(2) will be reduced From time to time to the extent of payment of your drafts or upon your written authority drawn hereunder and upon your request, upon receiving from you a letter certifying the amount by which this Irrevocable Authority to Pay X09-23804-9(2) is to be reduced, and the amount that will be available hereunder after such reduction. This Irrevocable authority to pay ezpires on the 7th day of august, 1988, in the Onited States of America. ~~....~. ~mn~ tirMl a:^ei 5,~nra Min.. rn nn. yi ni UeVno.. N.vMa eat25~A Oi. IprpOnn. (i0119aP555~ 35'f Lity of Rancho Cucamonga Decemher 19, 1986 • Page 2 Ne hereby undertake that your drafts, when drawn under the terms and conditions of this Irrevocable Authority to Pay, will be duly honored by us upon presentation. Please ensure that all drafts bear a reference to our Irrevocable Authority to Pay A09-23804-9(2). Yery truly yours, NEYADA SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION BY: ~ ) ~I br Tene-lc kha rt, Vice-V resident • S7ATE OF NEVADA ) SS. COUNTY OF CLARK ) On OecemDer 19 1986 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in antl ~p saie County and State, personally appeare0 ARLENE ECKMART, proved to me on the ba sfs of satisfactory evidence to be the person who executed the within instrument at 'J CF PRESI- • DENT of NEVADA SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCigT10N,ra~d acknowledged to me that She executed the within Instrume rtta ~ ~ Notary Publle - SYNC of N r'l CLAPN CONNTr notary's Signature ~~~' ~_~~~ ' ~~"" Vom~ A.i Co.;eff ar nrrainm6m cnrwaa o,cwiw 39,_ ~:. 5,. r95 >~ '' • RESOLUTION N0. E~ .~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONC~1, CALIFORNIA, APPROYINO IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT N0. 11997 NHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 11997, mnsistfng of 19 lots, submitted by Nordic Development, Subdivider, located on the southeast corner of Beryl Avenue and Hillside Road has been submitted to the Ctty of Rancho Cucaaonga by said Subdivider and approved Dy said City as provided in the Subdivision Map qct of the State of California, and in caxplfance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and NNEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdfvider has offered the improvement Agreement submitted herewith for apvrovai and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: • 1, that said Ingrovement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute sane on behalf Of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2, That said Imornvnmrnt Cxuriry iq ._ cg,..e~ .~ ~,.cd and sufficient, subject to approval as~ta form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and ?. That the offers for dedicatlon and the Final Map delineating sane he approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon an behalf of said City. n as` r~ L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~<us:0,~ ~~ ~,. < \ , `= i F F' ~ Z _ s 19;' I DATE: April 15, 1987 TO: Mayor, Members of the City Council end City Mnneger PRDM: Jerry Grnnt, Building Official SUBJECT: APPEAL HEARING - DANGEROUS BUILDING, 10155 24TH ST., RANCHO CUCAMONGA [. REODhbffiNDATION: That the City Council consider des gnetiono an eppeeis board or hearing examiner(s) in sppeel of the Notice and Order of the Building Official in the mstter of abstement of a dengero us building nt 19155 24th St. iI. BA(3iGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Bu[ldtng end Safety Division hea Deen involved n abatement proceedings sgafnst two owners of properties locnted between 24th Street and HumDolt Avenue east of Turner Avenue. The owner of property designated es 10155 24th has nppeeled the Notice anA ()r Aar nr fA._ RnilAi w.. nri:..:_: this is the first time an action of this type~has~come before the City Council, n policy decision is needed. Under the Uniform Code for Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, as adopted by the City, the Council has several options sa to how such appeals may be heard: a) The city council, as a Dody, may serve es the Board of Appeals; b) The City Council may appoint 5 other persons other then employees of the city to serve ea a Board; c) The Council may appoint one or more hearing examiners to hear the case; or d) The Council may appoint one or more of its own members to serve ns hearing examiner(s). 39 7 Ste[f Report - 10155 24th St. Page 2 (In the case o[ hearing examiner(s) the process is somewhat delayed becsuse of reports to be returned to the city council for ratification before a decision becomes tinel.) This mstter will be brought Detore the city council at the May 8th meeting for designation of a hearing body or officer end [or setting o[ a hearing date. Respectfully sutxni fled, Jer R. Cren, Building Ottlciel JRG:I1 • 398 • _ ~~ • _ _°, _ `c` y ~ i o ~ i " ~ y- ~ 1~~ ~ r ~ r ~ y c _ ~ '~ ,; ~_ a ^ i _ r ~ ,; r r ~ ~ r. ` J0. p = ° p. J` Q r y' ~ r. Y ~ C ^m n \ ~~ ~ nr~ a n• C ~ ?r',;f 1°o ty.~y_ 1~,~ o Y ~.v= ,y < tc ~n Y 3, o~ f3 h; `n~~r.~;~ O• n 2 n~ r JR Y 'c`am S. ~ ~a'OOY?i„'s~om ~;N' =3r.y ~ I a P t'~ ~~ ~ r r ___ a. r J, J~ o.~. S ~ ~ n ID p / V n .~ v` n ~ ~ Y ^y cyi nOi ~ ~ J _~' ` \C ~ Y .7 J 1 r - l 'ti O y F n !.~ ~ ~ O. 'y ' ti 2~ ~~ blS~ ~~ .. C~~~ J ~+, =~~ k~ r C~`'~~ ~ n ~ z F . 6`~ i, , r `~ ^ y y ~` n° ~ r ° S 7 ~ ~G . _ '~ ~,t '~y.{;~ q~ 1-~~.~,~ 1 ~ SG ~. r ~~ ~~ • S ; 1. ~ CR: • ~ ~: , ~ry ~. ~. `fin ~~~. 'Cry t.. _.: ~: ~ ~, ~~. ' ~~ ~~ ~-- L- t "~3~`3a&'aL''fo"~$'~o`m~'muacona.`.o~om-iaaa~.+ro.• ~' o ,~ ~•- <Onnre'.O-.,y pm~C`~Am"N fp i m ~ ~r~~m- =o_~ o=- $3 _m,coN,wm°m Z m•" a R, E~ti y '~-n..=o mop ~'mc C: -'3 to a ~ =9=_°_°^o 7 ~ 7 O -. S ~ S9 ~ ~^ > > tC S ~. 7 ~, Z T ~ ~. r m O . p; =g~'(°'~S~e~:~w'o~ c:7» eCn> Y> ryo. a °°~°~~m',o. 7 8-O^~1 y nZ m n=T n =~" > c3 ~• N=~-E ~=+.No.~aa°•°~Rg ~~E y y_p ~;t~o o c ;, c n •= - N ~ ,7 ? ~' ~ a ry~Rp ~ ~ xn' p p Z u°i n A w ' T% =70°_ n.o~c~f°~'" mm a3 °' p f] ~°° 9 e R c ar°ya~mms3'.~m= R~'~ n C oT 0 3 is "' > 7 m y p ~~ cM ~ ~ o e~ E T~ n ° ^ m n o ?~ ~ ~e ~ ~ or~FS'r3"'s'"F'n `j'~'t~o~`b'Q36o°~8'i ~+ L°~a ~r..~°-~©m=i `aaswm=o~00)dO~tnaLfp- T5 -$~(pp 0 o m ...? . . ~ ORf m ~j GO~I1i' N "'~'O o ° ` e 2. ~~ d •c a°~o ~ a ..j ^^ ~' /`y~~l. m [Gm!~ ~J o ~/yB~~. S -mom ~ s o ~ ^ ^ ` o o ~ I~~ o it ° .~ ~ < h 00 ~ 1 °_ ~ m -f ID ~ V R ? ~ S YmY~~ ~ O. ^ a ~• '~Nl ~ IC ~l l . ~J C~ -? "•1c.m °.`o_' ~ Sao ° ~3~° ~ Rm~~,~..o ; ~"n3yR `J~ ~°-,sy' »" ~E;a~°- 3~3a3.m o~3 °-m° 'gB~~m • m ~; e' m 3 o a _~ o n o m ~.» sTn o ~ ~ v Go o' y c o- < E m _ m ^~. o N ,°'ma > 3mN 'o~ o ~,oR' e00oo ~~'R 3n 3 a m ins ; ~'~ ° gb~~~ ~ ~ z , G'o 3 yyS~~° '" ° ~ c° m c °3 .~3~;~,°o~ z Fg a3tuT.. +oi s°$9Ti5~~ ~~»2- -na ~ .T cm`~ y m'~T3 om~ y H9~ o~ mvm _°° O' C O Z rp 7 .~ m 7 7 L' 7 N 7 ° `~ off>E <m ~ Nm ~ y $: ~^'Cg e ~ ~0~6 ~ H •R ~ S` y Eao'<GN~ ~ T o. s m ~~ ° y °. o 3~9 ~- ~J .,~ a C ~W1`q~'v~f''C''a~it~o.V. Cj'tD OO~~~ia~'~~~tcmj,TW at.~N~` F.a C'~ ° ° ~ Ohm JO~cna~p_ a '~ S ~ , 7 o~ ^ 0 L ~~ •_, O ' .1.7. 5= _ ~ :~ 6~ O c a -~~ =Pm -,- o_. =;m_ ~ b;~ ~ A 3 t ° aa ° ~ !j S-? < O f~1 s ~ F?~n,~ e:o2S s2oo • Q .. o.j m,o -~.j fmm~Y~ ?m ~, uSe'f _NO~_o ao~ o ~ o T~~ Fpm ^1 ~ c TTm a n <.m n°~3~~ 7 ~"^?_? 3 .e . 9,m -,-° 0 0 n ..ems 1 .e - _ :.?o ~ e ~ W O 9 ~ a 7a N _ ~ n ~ 3 ~ O O ° Tv~ H ~n ~ 'y ° ' Z nn °:SO RO y o ~e' m.o.. ~'c m ~ ° ~' _ . m~~''3° = ~ ~'~S . e . n a nnT o °i0^ ~ O o c E=.0. 'o3~S`. ~. ono ~ 2 n .-".'R ?007 y _ '>>> O`j ~=5 s E~rn'7 ISa~H oeoo-i a~''~''"~'.4''i~~d',-~''.~N~$'S~'~~~i~~~a~o-~..~iom~`ac`na`w~`o.`.o~om.taaauto- .~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ `~' c h S`S ~ d R O _. .. t ~ . ,y .~ R~ E. . ~ c _ , a ' N n r ?r ° n n _,~_ ~ a m 3 3 ~_~, ^aG r n m =3 c~ ~ ^<> > <3 3 ^~.~ =,m • O ~ E n ~c ~ c ?7. 9 C^. ° °° ca3 - y s n < p~m ~ ~ ~ o ~~ ~ a~_ = ~~~ 1 Hn=~ ~»m N t n o ~ .. m R r ~ ~ c9 ~'3~so°o=~,a~~ ~a=s~~~ o^ o c' m 3 0 0'~ m ~ .~ _. E n =_ _ = ? ~ M 'JOa ~ A ^ Cry ^ ~ 7 ~ = m ^ .~ . n J( a ~~~.° r ~ Si ~ ~ ° ~ O ~ u O .Z 6. 7 ° m O ,. ~ ^. 0 0 0 0 +~ 0 ' m d a w 7 R H y S n S c ° G ~ ^ S S Q ~ ° ~ ° ~ ~ m O ~ ^ rn 0 a~~.~o ~a~ cB a ~$ 0 r=1 ~? ~ a_ r~0-.g~io=cnx..r ~ ~ o ~_ _ ~ ^7`=~R ~`~m^co~ o ~~ ' ., o mo _3° > 0 ~ o H. 3 n ~ ~ ,_ Z aE»'8s~gsS3_chH= C~vi ~ n p' u< ry O -i = SO n A ~ afD ~? ~,O n ^c 3.~ma~G S.'0'gam~~ H o'~ yy'<?o3n Z ~OtfDS .C.L .9N 071J ~, a o ~ ° O a~ ^. N^ 9 ~ N~ 7~ N >^' C '^ 7 m ~m 1O. m h~A.3o ~S9F° ~7`-'~=~R Oa~~R 0.o n. ~ o_,oo ^- ~/o 0 ~~``6~'~u'i~n''a~''t`''o.w.•~~So'~~"~ii ~'~i~.i .N.. a'e`m=~au~awci=`o~omNacna.- [SJ n ^} m N -, aaE3y B 3.--,m ,~Y,o n3 m °em gay TOO SB cm9~ '--.,~g, =b', - `8- m go 9 •m ~co .r_s=o s~ a " e '~=.= x m ..n ~ <~3nY ;~~'^~;^~o8''.c a~N m''o-~~:n$nW~o'T<~t°°ac°^ °~m- ~o .jo ~ ° ~~ -'~ .P~ ~ s B'n.~ S H o 0 o n,~ To 3 m' ~N ~ c :^ ^90 S m^aS m m-O"SfD y m",~'^+7?N n m^O j o To ~c u ~ ~ o m Ste: ? >a ~ ~ a...TA mn c~'m m n n ~~ Ssm Tm n o•~ o •cn~'y~?n~a'g o.o,#g~~,o~3 ~u m_Sm'~~u3c, .m.::.~~:~a~3.~H 930p•°?.^m ^~1pmoDO~ a:uq`~'o tl ~_Rm~mp 3'Q =~~E~ami k3m~-ia 0 3 ~~; ~ a^ p r°,j ~ 0 6. o~ ~~ p G~ 7 ~ S ro m~ n~ •°• ~ ~. F 9 ~ ~. N 7 a n ~_~H~~moo-.Eao,cAO ,?__HY ''c~o'nn_ymCmry(3p'mR,~'$ faD .~;-`3°~:e ;;_E'~o 3T^SioT:Sm mB.^- <m r,'masoa_~m^3~~'4'...;_? _.. ^..o o Tm~m~ Em .Oixm~°S?yoffi "+YY c~um0a o`m_.i9`g~?o~~?,,,Q c' '~°oa c~~e KE .,T<~.~~oyo.o_. -noo~m yY So.a ~c oo, o. ucmm~~3oom oE.. ?, ~;~ < 3 7oB R >g~m53offi a~c -,an>>~goec °'Sm~„:mc_' ^O mrmi ~'2. .m.om To .3 ,o,c~w•y_o ao n m'o'o•<~ - xs,''p~,~ o~o.m2e~~~~ moo' n 'S3_~`~3« ~~~~~^. `° a ~'YfD> > '~.20 $.n.c~ R9 ^'~~c~T~m S^p 'm'3 ~'~9 <~c.3 "°° was $, B.g m c~?~"SRAe~` ~~mS m$5 o0 3~^"'$ oa-`Z 3c°m' ~S`d$ 'E 00~°°' ooh m<o- ~~eY _ 1 ~ _ _ - .+ .. fLLDaa GG~~ m -. (N.~ Wp (4 RN~ (~~Epp Tpp 1Epp pp ~ Y S O. m m O. lC T 1 ~ n fE n C~~N~CnL~N ~~t0~~1 Of~ifJ lO~~~D QDd0101 ~i 4)[o~O~D W~1 O`.NaC.~N~ '?4'^RQ CP,9 mo•,~~S9n <S9 e~ me.-n ,- x.. 3~^-~,j~^~as.~o'~~"iiO'm~-mi~R3~~~<~n'~Po.oo3 c?S'm~<e'~x.a'^,~•n ~y00 09mHO x0f9~7 O^O~< ffi~Sry mOmO•SmS-~m~3_~O ~ ~ "y -x~ 30o m'~ e'~~m~B no~:m~n~'9 ~~~AO nn~? E"s•a~33'~? soa ~ n. 3,~Y~^ m~~~~.ToiS~~a~'^m~Sc~,%' =. -, °. n ~^e o ~~o m o 3 `~B.SE'~,.m ~' ~ Tg e Y o ~ ~~o°•~: ~ co 3 ~ G'::: ~^ f". ~ ~ n R ~' tP ~ ~ A p• m ~ M S m `mG S E ~ m ~ - o ~ m R ,O" ~ "'~ a " s CCC m o 9 3 `~ ~~~mc.?aaY'r3? 3.a ~~.~~ ~$~O~cn°~`a.mc~'s~s~~'a ~~,~:~?_Sffi-°^'me,•SN T3~,o,S4m ~~~~,,•e~ •,e`@v; mg~`u~ 3 m ~~~ ;ffi~s .s~_ •aoffisa ms~`gB.s..~=~;m;Taoo~ _ n x a_oo.: ~ _,a.$ ffimo- crosas_...g o3nc H e"' J~ m o 7. '0'^ m m9 Q^ m m~ m m o ~ ~ S:- "^~om`°~~wo m•°c>>~<`$. '°~ ~aa m3r~$m 3~3~a ~- _ ~ - =~< Tmc~ Ho~a.c~6mm ~o.°.Nco ~m~m~ N$~°~8.n ~O~ ~~~vO~~a~.f~r~.p~^0 ~~1 O:~pL~N~~~D W NO+Cnat.~N~OtOm~f acna UN- a ~ a .~ ~ 3, ~ .'-..tD". ~ m ~ ~ _ ~6 ~ ~ o n 3 n ~ _~ ~ n ~ ~ ~• •~ y '0 3..~ ' ~ S ~ re ~o~3o~y~:°.ma~.~~~Na~3?.3m °-~.?~' oo~s~z~°m^~e x x.. n =_ :^~~^ I'~° m_ o -~ j o E• 3' 0 3' n.' T. m s T m o:'` m A a o w' m_ s .=3 y-:. 333 ~O 3 s~c~ow~~ao 3 c`g=c~T~ 3-NC ~iom - n mi~?~=c-~°~yo3=,sS„~.A._'~ o~x~=~3.~`e~•~o~x~~m~n - m 7 3~ S ~ N ° .m. <_ ~ ^~ R ~ S p T~ .^J ;' F ~ p c o ~ p ~ ~ Pi ~ T ~. ~ ? ~ CY ^^.n•n ^:D ,-c~'^.~QA.-.n mEmO O`<7 Cam. -~^ m. 3.y'oo•~e,~T'g_g_<;aO~~n5oS~3 ~3s~o.i3:~.~~°N~ ~~=~<.. 70 R -n .. ~ D•~•O AN 3 ~ yry 3 ~n ~ .^~ ~.^T ~~u0i -~'?-. ~~=..-~~>:'^oNTO~m3~~'~ ~s~$ 3 <i o-i-• ""33cv =a^ym~o °.~a °_, Y'-~n9 ,0°, a3 O'_• 53 .. :^O-~^. ~--~ m~~y.~~ °--°~~~~r ~-.° i5 TnX n -,o~ mom no~_ o3oy^ ~g~o~omery^ ~+ c31 ~:o >•,m,_N5 n~7^c~ • ~_ x~° xr m~~ui~~^?3.°6 °-,Em mos a__°. m_ n~_-~ xt^f__ ~~ ~ ° T. .. ~ -gym ~~ O O - ~ u -~ 7 fu w ^ # - ~ ~. c~- 3','o=ofOYe >:o~`~ on 'n'e" o>:m:_ ° so c' - r ((,,aa .~ rn~~ n ~p1 A llYY~~~ oNN m [-~~1 pp ~ -pp1 - Yl ° m "1 ~ ~. ~ m N •^ .--~~~.1m~.i i.~N ~~~O~~Im~ataN~O~C.m~1.mN aGaN~ c cm-~mflla CJN- oy~ 3 >:m m m T ~ nm m ~ ~~ ~ n ~° + . ° ? 3 ' ^ ~ n ' ' n ^ 3 . , m - C i A 2 S b ` 8 .. 7 3 m " ~ c . ` . ~ ~ • K = . ~ = o o s - ° n o -._3E y~RHaC>>n~~_cm"'gmm~.3.=v`?3~~oc=o»-fix ^ i ~ ~ ~ f~ ~ p ~ `mot o ~ m ~ ^ 7 T. m n' n m ~... ~ O ~'. m`K ~ ~ ^L 7 - r. g._•_: o ~ s E ' ^ ~ ' < - ~ H ~ 7 g ~ n E_ ^ ~ ~ y y `,3yF,,',i~ 9 c . m ~ = S m_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~6° . - < `^ -+ ~; S~ y `~- 7 tl 3~ ~. S- 7 °^ _ S .'j ~Z $~j! 3^ m O C 3 v 9 d~ ~ ^J s y `C ~ u'i m 7 3' ^• 1 G m ~ (~' ~ ,s . ~ O _ ~ ~ H ~ . n C ^. - C % w C T. < w ^~. '_S w C 3 C t9 ^~. '^ c tC -. O 7 ~ 'O `e n F' `< ^n-n'm'ce ii'mon~~. `^AO^m?_oo°-.3. °o'~n• tmt~4~ p ~~N~mEoSE°cm3c° ~~`°3'o'a~om.°o:^ao oAOS~com c ^ H °'=•„n... °'~` m e ~~ gsa c 7 '" ~m o m °''R'e s f9 m m' x ms^m a=,^.~°-.~S=.cT~ s"3a~^~aE°<~° o T~'~3°<_,~m° o ~ ~ _ ' ~n~m"2H=•°m'•Eg^ao ~,°~c~'~~m °3.3m7~3~, °°c3~°o4,a x -N ~. ~. ° aN n ^~'.TO~~a~m~E°~,n "35r~,'~<~m ~$.nN~S~~mmm~y•o~mm =_c.~n ~~~ ~B ~<TC 3mstyy~~3o Qice~ n_aoEctosmo- =s.°~.~'.~~~^°.SNcs°9-~~ $~~~S~-,c~' `°3-'•me~'e•a'r,o;`4..'aE;= $=c$nmNO of ,<c •~ ~ Xp'~~'n•n??A~S^~~a~ ~~o ~~mte~ ~om~'~~co~~~~~m~n •yoi CCU~,a W W We W Wrr~~..~~ ppp~j NN pNN NN ..:°GCJ~cna Ga''lO.•p~Of .i~W dG.>N ~Ctm m~tacnar:~t0 .~.~ ~ ~ = 7 ~ O f~ Vf ww"t ~ ~ G. ^ O ° fn O ~ C ~1 j~ CAS % ('f ¢ f~i~ d rym ~ ~ O' aa^e P i~ P - ~ w z 7 9 7 ~GGI p .~ ~ C17 S p y ~ ^ [~1 ~ ^ ~ ~ _ e ^ n .°.. ~ c 2 A .~°a'a_~3p;~n~~oMvN_.rt-. ~C]~•~ppmp'w'~CN'o'C~'°eS r.~a~a•3o'~^ :OYOO~~i^m~-'m ^450_°W,(p=mf~N°=i~ wa w~7CL~~.^. ~i ° A O O _i +~.. +~^ 3G W o=oS~20~ ~Sr-=7m °, o,o^_°. c. ~j~,~5=-jfD ~n>>.~~s~~~o'h sr~ma~N enA7:m~ ° -=^ ^e'osm cmo,y oG~m~ee= c ^s,<. o•3 c ~ oo°nc° w°v'X 9a_s ~•~=a3 =~~e o°Sm~>> ~mA ~~'7=,R ~~$°'°~~.x.~m ~,e~ 9~hm O.m 6.~~.7 .°'.OO° v .. _~ a°-.°~ 1o e~"3~wm°m. m~? ~~1o eo~C~~one~ . y e o °3.~ ~ m .'. Fg ,o ~98.~m o 2 -, w S Cn3$ mN ~ o am ~ ~' ~~~ Soso ~a ~'~ ~ ~~m ~ n. 3 A e._''m^~ ~m ~ o~ 3~ T sg~ c o'm •~~ w 5 ~"~ 3~ -.~_~ `~.3 ~"mESa apg awe =~~~^-~_~' ~ ono ym?S ~ew~~~~s-m'~ S=;m ~?v••oc c..`~ofim°-= s26~_ W to .+ 5`3 3~~ ~. ^ ~ ° A w ~~3 =° o _. N7 ~~ Rp C N W '~ 7 _. ^m S3 ^~ T ~ w~ w' m n n~ ~ 5' C O /O/ Tha San Bernardino County Tntpportafion Commission 5AN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS • A PLANNING COl1NCIL OF COOPEMTIN6INTEAACTIVE GOVERNMENTS Memo ... Nn~ Arrovhead Avenue, $une •0! ~~~~~"~ 9an Bernardino. Cablanu 92M1 (71q gga-9278 O ate: March 23, 1987 To: SANBAG Board Members From: Wesley C. M,:Oeniel, Executive Director subject: MAGLEV Train This is the meeting st which you have scheduled • vote on the general question of support, no position, or oppose the Maglev Brain. t However, in this leaf weak you probably all received a letter from Aasem6lyaeo Eavs• and Leonard urging thst you take no active, sad noting they have secured an amendmemt requiring two • sea Bernardino County members. As Chia is written on March 23, we also •re in contact with Assemblymen Eaves concerning another amandmnnt which would limit the Commiaaion'a initisl authority to further studies only, including the full EIS. It would than tali. ._t::-••~,-,; 1 <aiaincive action to trigger the action phase. Assemblyman Katz' reaction is unknown. Attached ere the folloaing items: 1, The Eaves-Leonard letter. Note that it implien, in the last ma„or paragraph, only the study level of authority. 2. The bill, AB 1839. 3, The recent new letter from Bob Nieheua, tba ecoooaic impact conaultent. While ii does not change any dnt• from hie basic Phase I2 report, it displays th• comparison ^ueh better. 'Note on Exhibit I, at the bottom the imbalances are still very clear: a f554,000.000 net outflow to Lna Vegas annually. 4, sCAC's recent (March 10) en elyaia of traffic end missions, with the impact estimated at one full needed additional freeway lane at the full ridership. Tha report also places the economics into a regional perspective. ~~ 5. The County's enslysia of plsnning end permitting authority. yo s .mtf -~ .oewrto. }.arrow tm ttM Wa, cMMe. COlrow, tMrtM,A Oaua naa¢t. ~Qtu ura. „awiClM, wemxn. onruia. nnhcrq cuc.wwtA etoiv,at. w..ro. a,a stawuwr,o. unuo. wcromus. couan as ear w•m,wer,p AGENDA ITEM :.._.~~ 5ANBAG Board Member^ MareD 23, 1987 Pa(e Two 6. A clippia; frog last month's ^eetiaQ. Recomseaded Aetioo: Up to you. CL-87-129 ec: AasamDlymaa Haws Assamblymaa Lroaard Aaaasblyaaa [atz Lna Ve[as repraaeata2ly ra ~~ • • yo3 N/EHAUS & ASSOCIATES . nESE~w u+o corrouLnNG • ECONOMICS 9701 SnOe R, ab. 200 ' PUNNING Si11Y m10vi, Camp,p~ 93105 • ENVINONMENTK ~NALrSIa a0bee7•t9U February 26, 1987 A,~R _ : i887 Mr. ues McOan tel, Executive Director ~ San 9ernardino Associated Governments cor:s 444 N. Arrowhead Are., /301 San Bernardino, CA 92601 Subject: Clarification of findings -- socioeconanic analysis of super speed ground transportation system (SS/GTS), Las Yegas- Southern California Reference: (1) Applied Economic Systems, Inc., 1986. Socioeconomic Impacts of the SS/GTS, Ftna1 Repert. Prepared for City of Las Ypas. Santa Barbara, California (June). _ (2) San Bernardino Associated 60vermuplis. 1986. Las Vegas - Ontario Maglev Train: SANBA6 Staff Rnalysts and ..Critique. San Bernardino, Callfornta (Oecaslber 5). Dear Wes: Thank you for your careful review of our June 1986 front reDOrt ,rcfcrcnw :). Da;2u uu yuur stair report lrererence 2) and our subsequent conversations, it Ts apparent to me that same of our findings were not ;resent eC in our report and its exetut the sum;ary in a way that is clear Lo everyone. This letter clarif fes our ftndi nqs and presents our data 7n a different -- and hopefully better -- way. the overall conclusion of our regional analysis fs that Soutnern Callfornta •wou ld gain most of the short-term jobs and incare from system construction, white the Las Vegas metropoi ltan area would gain most of the tong-term jobs and income due to induced ridership and visitor spendtnq. Short-tens effects would occur while the system was being bunt and equipment pur- chased (completion assumed in 1994). Long-term Impacts would persist for the operatfnq life of the system (approximately 1995 through 2025). Exhibit 1 is a revised version of TaDte S-1 of the summary of our final report. i have expantlW the table to include t.".e secondary or awltiDlier effects of the SS/GTS, as welt es the direct effects ortpinatty presented !J •yoy EXHIBIT 1 OIRELT AND TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE 55/6T5, ' lA5 YE6A5 AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA (ALL DOLLARS IN MILIONS OF 1984 DOLLARS) Lu Southern Las Yegas as S of Yequ California So. California Short-term, 1986-94 (pfannfnq; constrvction) Peak Year 1993 1992 - Direct Impacts (excluding multiplier) JoDS (a) 598 1,440 42Z Payroll (a) f 20 f 47 43S Consumer spendf nq (a) f 14 f 32 44S Materials/equip. spending (0) f 27 f 168 16S Total Imparts (including multiplier) Jobs (c) 1,436 7,849 18S Payroll (c) f 40 f 199 20S Spending or sates (c) f 99 f 680 15S Long-Term, 1995-2025 (operation, Induced and diverted ridership) S ~S Dam a erati on (excluding multiplier) • ( ; 86 128 67S Payroll (d) f 3 f 4 75Z Consumer spending (d) f 2 f 3 67S Materials/services spending (e) f 4 f 18 22i Induced Ridership (excluding multiplier) no. of riders (baseline scenario, 000) i995 (f) 1,161 271 4292 2025 (f) 1,324 421 3142 Rider spending (baseline scenario) 1995 (q) 356 39 9132 2C 25 (q) 428 62 6902 Diverted Ridership (excluding multiplier) Reduced gasoline spending (h) (f 3) (i 4) 75S Reduced restaurant spending (i) 0 (i 1) OS Total Net Impacts (including multiplier) 1995 JoDS fj) 13,183 2,153 6125 Payroll .(j) ~'S 259 f 49 5295 Spending or sales (j) S 608 f 125 4865 2025 JoDS (j) 15,882 3,180 4995 Payroll (j) f 311 f 72 4325 Spending or sales (~) f 731 f 177 • 4135 yo,- Y„ Mr. Wes McOan iel, Executive Director February 26, 1987 ' San 3ernardino Associated Governments Page 2 • in Table 5-1. I also have modified the table to show esti:oaLed annual sdendinq for equipment, materials, and services -- rather than just the multi-year cumu tat ive spend inq shown in the original table. I have not rounded these data, so you can match than to ind ivitlual tables in chapters 5, 6, 7, and B of our final report (see the notes and sources at Lhe bottom of Exhibit I). Rote also that the table expresses economic impacts to Las Vegas as a percentage of impacts to Southern California. If impacts fn both regions were identical, the final column of data would read 100 percent. The short term inciudes planning, design, engineering and construction of the project -- assumed in the report to be :926 through 1944. Ourinq this period, peak-year total jobs (including multipiier effects) in Las Vegas (1,436 jobs) are oniy 18 percent of peak-year total jobs to Southern California (7,849). Put another way, peak-yetr total Jabs in Southern Catifornit in the snort term would be 5.5 times as large as in Las Vegas. in the loop term (for examplq 1995, the first year of operation), total Las Vegas jobs (including multiplier effects) are 612 psrtent of total S cu theta California jobs. fn other words, Southern California jobs in the first year, of operation are only 36~percent of Las Vegas jobs. A similar interpretation applies io the other measures -- payrolls and sates -- presented fn EaMbit 1. Alt show the same pattern, though the magnitudes differ samewh at due to variations in wages, sales patterns, end multiplier effects between the two regions. The total payroll figures are includeC in the total sales estimates, since they are computed as payments to tailor which are covered Dy the values of sales. ' Cther slat istics showing the reLit~. -•ttcrn -f ;,;,Nn~La can oe egUnily userui. riqu re 1 displays the net total sales differences between the two reyicns -- in favor of Southern California C~.rin~ construction and in favor cf Las Yegas for the operationai life of the system. Figure 2 illustrates the share of bi-regional DaYrolis generated by the 55/GTS in 1995 actruinq :o workers 7n each region. Las Vegas is praj acted to receive about 81 pert eat of these payrolls. hope this revised presentation is useful to you. Piease do not hesitate to call if you have any further questions. - 9est regards, NIrHAOSnB ASSOCIATES ~v ~^ Pobert O. Niehaus, Ph.D. PreS ;c eat a Principal Economist cc: Bab Parsons, Robert E. Parsons, Inc. , ,; ack Thomas dn, City of Las Vegas yoc . notes and Sources in June 19x6 final report: •" (a) Tables 5-Z and 5-3. (b) Tables 5-6 and 5-7. (c) Tables 8-1 antl 8-2 present secondary (multipler) economic impacts for constructtdn phase. These have Deen addeO to direct impacts to calculate !Dials shown. Total payrolls are included within total sales, since payrolls are treated as one of the (major) costs of product ton covered by the value of sales" (d) Text; pp. SE 5-B and SE 5-9. (e) Table 5-8. (f) Table 6-2. For Las Vegas, sum of `Baseline Scenario' and "Weekday.' For Southern Caiifornia, sum of 'Business' and "Non- Business.' (q) Table 6-4. (h) Table 7-4. Little vartatipn from year to year. (i) Text, p. 7-15. Little variation from year to year. (j) Table 8-9. See explanation of payro?1 and safes in note (c) above. yd 7 Figure 1. Net Total Sales Benefits from SS/GTS to Las Vegas and • Southern California eoo 300 a00 200 100 100 O t00 i00 200 X00 700 eoo Figure 2. Shares of Long Term Total Payroll Benefits from SS/GTS to las Vegas and Southern Californta (1995) L~• V~e~• t CaM~mt~ (1e.OR) • yoP ve¢-e2 teea soar M E M O R A N D U M March 10, 1987 T0: Transportation i ComIDUnieseiona committee Executive Committee FROM: SCAG Staff SUBJECT: LAS VEGAS-ONTARIO MAGLEV PROPOSAL Issue: Should SCAG policy co®ittees take a Lormal position to support or to oppose the Las Vegas-Ontario Maglav propomal? Reeoamanded Action: (1) No lormal poeitlon is required st tRis Lima. (2) sCAG s ouSd transmit technical/policy issue for further study and ' recommendetiona to the City of La vegae for consideration. (7) Stott should keep SLAG policy commtttue appraised. o! project-related legislative s!lorta and now inLosmation as appropriab. • Back4round and Proiact Deacrimtlon As previously reported to the Transportation i Communicatlona and Executive Co®itteu, the Clty of Loa Vsgas prapcus to provifle Suoaz Speed Train sarvsr. !'_t`<•tc.: ~-- Vy.. and vntarao, calitornia. Tvo Phases of consultant prepared study have concluded that the proposed service is feasible, would cover th• 230 mil• distance in about i5 minutes, with scheduled service opsratinq from 6:00 a.m. to 1:00 a. v. daily !or a round trip Cara of $85 (198a dollars). Porecaetad annual patronage for 1995 ie 3.6 million round tripe which is expected to grow by same 40i to 5.0 million round tripe in 2025. initial capital costs would be $2,536 million with total annum opsratinq and main=chance coats of S7a million (1984 dollars). Relationship to SLAG Plans Although SCAG's RTP and AQMP support the development at haw transportation technologies, including high-speed rail systems, as a strategy to provide headed mobility end congestion relief in an enviornmentally sound and cost affective manner, the consultant finding of financial and sngineazinq lessibility of MAG-LEV construction and operations has not provided satisfactory anawera to several outstanding issues which may significantly impact Southern California. M~ Ove r~iaw of Outstanding Racional Issues Principal areas of regional concern include: (1) Net consumer spending yo9 Transportation i Communications Committee Exaeutlve Committee LAS VEGAS-ONTARIO HAGLEV PROPOSAL Page 2 . i alanee to Soutbern California, (2) Ground across congestion at Ontario train terminal location, (1) Induced regional tra!lic, congestion, and air pollution, end (4) As a spaeinl purpose train, the large investment will do little to relieve congestion loraeaat to occur in the region. Additionally, the Exaeutlva Committee noted that (a) job/housing balance could be a1lectad between the ontaria terminal and desert community residents, aM (b) that it the project moves forward, Las Vegas should be required to mitigate anticipated impacts noted in the SGC report. items 1-~ are discussed 171 brie! detail in Attachment E. A more complete list o! issues which requizo further study era liatad 1n AtGehment A. Current Status Currently the City o! Lss Vegas is develop inq a local funding package of approximately halt a million dollars squally split among the City, County, State and private sources to maintain a smnll stet! to promote the eatablishmant o! s S1-State Super Speed Ground Transportation Commission. The purpose of the Commission is to secure right-of-way, perform nacusary enginesring and enviornmantal studies, issue debt, select routs and terminal sites, and to award a franchise to build and operate the„ayatam. Future ^Phssa III" work rill consist et those ae[ivities lesdinq up to the psesage of lagialation needed to form the ei-State Cemaiu lon. In • this regard, California Aseeablyman Richard rots has introduced Aasambly Hill 1879 to the calilornia Legislature. 7- similar bill is being introduced to the Nevada Lagisiatura. AH 1879 is rhovn in Attachment C. Exaeutlva Committee Comments on the outline Of AD 1839 era contained in Attachment D. "Phase IV" work will include lranehiaea selection, EIS preparation, securing a joint uaa agr~amant !or the I-15 right-oL-wey, englnaerinq, and securing project permits. Tha Clty hops to award the Lranchises contract with construction commencing by 1989. Local agency stet! who have bean following project study work to-data incl~~da represantstivaa from San Sarnardino County, City o! Ontario, Ontario chamber of Commerce, SGG, and caltrans. The San Bernardino Associated Governments and Transportation, Commission (SANEAG) will consider taking a position on this proposal at theft regular meeting in April, 1987. staff will continua to monitor project developNnt and related legislative efforts, and provide future aeatus reports to SGG policy committees. Attachments C~ y/o ~. TZansportation i Communications commitUe Executive. COmmittea LAS VEGAS-ONTARIO MAGLEV PROPOSAL Page 7 • Attachment A -- LAS VEGAS-ONTARIO MAGLEV PROPOSAL Ticfi feel/POlicV Issues for F1~rthar Studv SLAG has identified issues which regain further study and/or explanation by the City of Las Vegas. These eras of conwrn have not bean sufficiently treated in consultant-prepared studies to data: o Distribution of eeonoaic benefits and costs in Ls Vegas and SLAG regions: Is the 4 to 1 net economic outflow stemming lrom the project something this region wants to accept? Can it be mitigated? o SCAG region congestion benefSCS: To what extent sight the project help alieviate SCAG region Sorecaated tratLic congestion, S! additional stations or termini are provided? o Orange County project terminus: What is the feasibility and coat eSLeetivenees of Orange County as a possible terminus of the system? o Bazatow and Victorville stations: what would the impact of station locations at these cities be? Do cities vent them? What is the alfeet of intermediate station locations on overall project feasibility? o Impacts on develoment: Iuup of induced growth, land we impacts around terminal ~rar!nn 1^ ^attric -:~ is ,,,~ 3:~..~? riuw wiii development patterns ba affected? o Problems in Vicinity of stations (safety, noise, parking, circulation): What era the full coats o! mitigati~nq these issues and who is responaibl• for providing added services? c Regional and local air quality impacts: How will the preferred alternative affect project-related and induced traffic emissions? w Y // Trarspo rtation 6 Communications Committee Exacntiva Committee LAS VEGAS-ONTARIO NAGLEV PROPOSAL Page 4 Attachment B -- LAS VEGAS-ONTARIO MAGLEV PROPOSAL Outstanding Regional Iasuaa it should be pointed out that the following isauss emerge from a rather cursory technical review o! consultant prepared studies which total soma 51.5 million, and that *-om the perspective or pose ibla 5GG region impacts, studies to data have supplied neither complete and satisfactory answers, nor auggasted mitigation measures. The decision o! overall project merit, however, should ba made lollowinq consideration of all "sides" oL the issue by those affected public and private dacisionmakers. o set Consumer Snanding Imbalance to Southern Calitornia Taking the position that project economics is a valid area of technical review, net consumer spandinq is greatly weighted Sn Lavor o! Las Vegas. Tabl• 1 illustrates the order oL magnitude of net outflow of consumer spending and yob creation attributable to the proj wt: Tabl• 1 1995 Nat E enditure Job Imbalances (m one o 198{ o are) (A) (S) (C) Lost 5GG Region Gained SGG Region Nat SGG Region E and Jobs E end Jobs E and Jobs 100 Loss Direct -$ 360 5 40 -$320 Indirect -5 566 5 63 -a5Us Total -$1,108 5123 -5985 (-19,670 jobs) (+1,963 jobs) (-17,707 jobs) 50t Iris Direct -S 180 $ 40 -5140 Indirect -$ 283 $ 67 -$220 Total -$ 554 5127 -5427 (-10,817 jobs) (1,963 joha) (-8,854 jabs) • To place these statistics in perspective, in 1984 the reoreational/amusement industry's share of SCAG's regional economy was: ^ ind~_st_ry $ volume -- 528,742 million or iD$ of regional total. o :ndustzy Sobs -- 619,000 jobs or 12t of regional total. ~ SCAG region S GNP -- $201,828 million and 5,923,000 jobs. C^.. C.^.¢7 A spending losses in the 5GG region result Lrom induced travel :rom Southern Calitornia Co Las Vegas. Column 8 repreeants increased ex?enditures in the SCAC zeq ion as a result of induced travel from Las ':eggs to Southern Calitornia. Column C represents the net •ttect of protect related spandinq losses and gains to the 5GG region. Job ~/~ ~- Transportation i Communications Committee Executive ComIDittaa LAS VEGA.:..-ONT71R2O [4aCLEV PROPOSAL Page 5 , gains and losses depicted ara commensurats wits expenditure levels. The two scenarios shown describe (1) a high (1001) loss situation, whereby the Las Vegas spandinq gains are all net loss to the SLAG ragion, and (2) a low (SOt) loss situation in which only halt oL the spandinq gains to Us Vegas ara net spandinq losses to the SCAG ragion. This assumes that the other halt o! the'spendiOq lossas may have bean spent outside the ragion in ether recreational arses instead. Zt sho:ld be pointed oui that a net seonomie advantage amounting to 5625 million dcas accrue to Southern California during the tan year eonatruction period; however, that advantage is overshadowed by one single year of operational imbalance. In addition, there may also ba economic advantages to communities around system stations. o Ground Aeeess Conaeftion ~" New traffic demand induced by the proposed superspead train project which terminates in tbs. Ontario area'will aired both regional and local facilities. Phase ZZ studies make it dittieult to analyse the potential ground seeese impacts because: (1) the terminal location is unknown, ~(2)~•ene peak-hour inguency of train trips is not nixed, and (7) passengers per train trip are not clearly explained. • Given these uncertainties, SCAG analysis o! possible state highway and local arterial Lacilitiy ispaets assumed the following conditions to illustreta a range or iagncta: (1) s 2010 operating condition nor aversge apkday and weekend day which treats aaeA operating hour of the day as handling Si 'o! daily passenger hoardings, (2) three additional impact scenarios which utilize a lot, 2Ot an4 ]O8 peak hour pa naenger damana total, and (]) that the split of traffic which a??roaches the area of terminal location (I-10/I15) is 48= from the ~;nst and South, and 322 from the east. Table 2 depicts the results. Table 2 Naw TraffSe Demand Gnerated by SS/GTS Train Proposal (Peak Hour--Year 1995 i 2010) Yur t wukdav Weekend 1995 St 145 217 lOt 290 474 . 20t 580 868 30= 870 1,702 2010 St 173 260 lOf 746 520 20i 692 1,040 70i 1,078 1,558 Yi 3 Transportation i Communications Committwa Exacativa Committee LAS DEGAS-ONTARIO MAGLEV PROPOSAL Page 6 • In recant eonvsrsationa with the consultant coordinator far Phesa II :4aglev studies, it was indicated that peak hour Friday afternoon train departures from Ontario would total 5, an average of one every 12 minutes. This level of passenger service wculd ba comparable to the 2010, 20t impact scenario (waakand) depicted above. By 2025, oassangar usage would rise to the 30t impact scenario (waakand). Primary regional fraaway access will be provided by I-lo, Rt. 57, Rt. 60, Rt. 91, I-15 and I-210. Aa a point of reference, in 1984 portions of the Rt. 57, I-10, Rt. 60, and Rt. 91 experience savara recurrent congastion in normal commute periods. REGIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM IMPACTS. Looking at 2010 regional highway par ormanca w thout the pro act, Fiqurs 1 indictee the deficient regional highway facilities expected to experience savara future congastion. At the 20t seaMrio level, the addition of 692 (760 vehicle trips in pack direction) average weekday peak hour vehicle trips at first glance appears to be ainimal, although westbound eraltic on I-10/Rt.60, and eastbound Rt.60 traflic oast of I-15 will experience delay. Average waakand pack hour prof act trafllC howver is likely to cause significant additional congastion as it adds the equivalent o! up to • i/2 lane (Sal vehicle trips in pack direction) o! traltie demand on I-lo which is swerely congested. Zn 2023, this demand is expected to incraaaa by SOt to 1,358 vehicle trips or the approximate equivalent nand for one additional fraaway lane. :,OCAL FACILITY IMPACTS 5xtandinq the soma methodology used for regional tacilitiaa to local facilities, Table 3 indicates how local roadways, Lt used as a primary route to the terminal location from the fraaway ayatem, >rould likely ba impacted. all locally identified facilities in 1995, if utilized as a primary route to SS/GT3 terminal from the fraaway under assuaed conditions could ba impacted on both Waakday and wukend paakhour trawl times. Under the St scenario, seeeions of Etiwanda both north and aoulh o! i-10 would ba at or above capacity. At the 10i scenario in 1995, all 'tacilitiaa would experience savara peak hour congastion on both weakdaya and weekends. Local aceus to the proposed terminal fac!lity could ba provided as a direct freeway connector which would lesson impacts illustrated hero, but no mention is made o! this alternat ivs. i• y/ Y .} ~li • Y U Z W U W 0 W Q r O W OQ ~I'~ N W S ~ .nl ~ W LI iy O N Z O U O J iO V a n ~ c i ~ [t n ~ ~ f j o ~ ~ w t ^ ~ 3 i ~°u ~ N ~ I \~ 1'1 i ' i ~ ~ t i P O ~ i O ~ I n _ a ~ % w M1 tl1E ! I .~ .~ W ~~ a. .. J ' ~ ~ ~ n 2 ~ ~ ~ „ ~ O n > t iii i } f i i ~°4 1 ~ ~.~' ~ ~` ~ A ~ I. y O Q ~ ~ y M1 t _ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~_ R ~ ~ O W ~ O :'~ C u /1 N ~ ~ /~ , t C '~ ) O n ~ o C~/~_ n~ r x / ` CV v~ ~. `rY~ ~ 2ransportetion i coamunicationa Committee Executive Committee 1J~.4 VEGAS-0NTARIO MAGLEV PROPOSAL Page 7 i Tabl• 3 Naw Trattie Demand Genaratsd by SS/GTS On Local Facilities (Year 19 S) Major Roadway 1995 Uvel of 1995 Laval 1995 Uval o Local Routes Capacity at Sarvica of Service Service(+/ (w/o 38GT5) (w/SSGTS 8 S~1 SSGTS 8 30i) WEEKDAY 4th Straat 7,200 8/.6S C/.79 F/1.40 Et iwnnda (N) 2,770 D/.87 E/1.00 F/1.68 ~tiwanda(S) 2,990 E/.93~ F/1.07 F/1.75 Airport Or. 1,060 A/.33 A/.47 F/1.15 Millikn (N) 1,690 A/.33 B/.67 F/1.34 Milliken (S) 2,380 C/.74 D/.88 F/1.56 WEEKEND 4t:'tStraet 3,200 8/.6S D/.86 P/1.88 Etiwanda (N) 2,770 D/.87 F/1.07 F/2.09 Etiwanda (S) 2,990 8/.93 F/1.14 F/2.16 Airport Dr. 1,060 A/.33 A/.S4 F/1.56 Hillikan (N) 1,690 A/.53 C/.73 PJ 1.76 • Hillikan (S) 2,380 C/.74 E/.95 F/1.97 -- L:.C u,. naaubpciona usao in this section era used for illustrative purpops and subject to debate, additional detailed rata and anal}•s is era nsadad to aore accurately determine the actual origin and travel routes o! toreeast paaaangars, snd to gain a batter undarstandinq o! train usage peaking cheraetaristies ahieh might signiLieantly elfact regional and local highway ground access impacts on identified facilities. This is especially true for the Friday P.M. departures and the Sunday P.M. arrlvnls. r yic Transportation i Communications committee Executive committu LAS DEGAS-ONT1UtI0 NAGLEV PROPOSAL Page e o A~4uality Impacts A conservative estimate of local and regional air quality impacts •aas made by evaluating air omissions generated by additional traffic (53 scenario level) attracted to iha the SS/GTS terminal area. For localized air quality impacts, tour receptor areas ware identified, and an evaluation of csrbon monoxide omissions attributable to the operation of the project in 1995 wee completed. The rangt or Co incraasa in forms of parts par million at the receptor locations in the City or Ontario varied from 9.Oa to 17.04. An estimate of 1993 daily regional aIDiselons for SS/GTS induced tzattle travelling lrom diitaront parts of the SCAB to the Ontario terminal location, indicated vary small percentage incraasa: of tailpipe emitted pollutants as follows !or the a regional traffic impact scsnarioa shown Sn Table 2. Table 4 shows the results. Table 4 Tail i a Pollutants Emitted b SS GTS Induced T7attlc ens par ay) Amount o L Pollutant Fisittad TOG CO NOX P!t 3i Scenario .068 .717 .101 .007 l0i Scenario .136 1.474 .204 • .014 20i Scansrio .277 2.868 .404 .028 303 Scansrio .409 4.702 .606 .D42 +* AVarage aMOa ens/day amltta n • _°^..".3 ~i muuii. sources Sn 1979 ware: a CO --- 6,180 tone o NOX --- 832 tone o PM --- 89.6 tons o Sinala Purpose Train Since the termini of the train era located in Ontario and Las Vegas (with soma discussion o! poeaibl• stations north o! Ontario in '~ictorvill• and Barstow), the only immediate congestion relict potential appears to be along the I-13 Corridor. According to Coltrane, current route development plans indicate the Woad to add capacity *_o I-13 batwern Barstow and cA/Nevada border by 1993. successful train operation may delay this data by several years. However, it thn train is auccesstul in diverting Loa Vegas bound auto -ratfic to train use, it is unlikely that the Woad !or the additional capacity would vanish given the number o! intarmedla~• destinations and ocher recreational vehicle uyage I-13 serves. ~ • Y/ 7 ~. rra~ ~S o, _? era hjo - • ~`CAS~ ~°ptp . 6 ~ ~, O,y1,ARrO ee ~U'ic ~C~v ati°Rg •yar PRop~SAt ~0~2 t tee rRo o.~ 1 p 1ga' AhtaCF ^teRt ~ M; SU~`CI': SLAG sport ` h F h Shat ahiO ~ R ['FCA" O n~ co A N~ U owe roh Nt~r~ 1yA~pntoa rioR M Aro hts S, rvoy. s B s„e;,~~ 1, re9ara , hh ARopos cOay~i tte . spe ~ t~ .Ym c Rt ~tatr g hye Ac F AL e ° rain °'n+ai Nary Was o ke° 'he ArOPo 1p~ xatt j`~sr ari oh~`e c o°a1 tour sal, to 4o ha ohed to °mh'1 ht os aQ Cesileot Cats o BA1 eme~e te=ea ~u~e9 ;evejoAQ • ° -Pe eye1ogee ~s Ar ~ a~C °ta1s, the 6i `Sr he o hari O~S Wh c ese sAee °IIO Sego ire Whioh a t~Ctn ate co ~s ve Wo41 stt Crd n9 ~e4i p r•(s~~sPort AreAatteQt CAr ate re9i ~~sst°n tr 4ds .y 91 4eate ao at ~ ara@rr tt AAor o? o ~t r of°rhia re P ns aej~Q- o om caiitOrni ht sh WhiC ~Ahase Co r gea s anti °j2a~ Z~j1 ho Ar ~~ ta1jtor a be to x121h+nq brq ti 8 $stsAtnorOr'ee re1a ey tortta !r ~aI2C @ r re12 evhj PY ~ a ter.hpac. ever 1S, ~'y to o'`~aj- 93', a any re°as~her ny Ia tltus4 e .,~ ~~~ ~,.. . ~ INTEROFFICE MEMO~~ DATE February 27, 1987 P NE 4141 ~ • FROM SHARON HIGHTOWER• PLANNING OFF ICB~ ~ r3 OFFICE OF PLANNING i~~/p(q~~~ TO DEBORAH BARMAC R• SENIOR EXECUTIVE ANALYST e~forau tenwdiae HOARD OF SOP£RVISORS SUBJECT HAGLEV PROPOSAL - COUNTY REVIEW AND PERMITTING AUTHORITY As requested we are providing you with our understeodinq of the County's review and permitting authocity over the proposed super speed train between Las Vegas and Southecn California (Naglev). Sen Bernardino County - Responsible Ageney and County Authority: The Maglev Bail line would have support facilities such as passenger terminals, which are proposed to be within the Cities o! Ontario and Las Vegas and, perhaps, Victozville Those cities would have authority over these portions of the projeei, within the city limits, unless special legislation makes other prow iaions. The County would have Responsible Agency review authority as defined in CEpA if any portion of the pcoj act ar support facilities crossed either private land in the unincorporated pact of the county or if a permit wece to be required to crass some county road or right-of-way. The franchise section in the P.U.C. code 6001 and 6002 that could give the County some additional responsibility is not applicable because this is an In tersta[e railway doing interstate business. If no County permits were to be required by this proposal, then the County would r.ot have the tight of Aasponsibie Agency review. However, bee ease the County has extensive health and safety pcoteetion provisions, some County department such as the Environmental Health Department, will very Likely need to issue some permit, and then the County would be a Responsible Ageney as specified by tM State CEDA guidelines. In add itlon, under the provisions of the P.U.C. Code Section 1001 and the California 2ransnortatian Commission provisions, the County would have additional authoriey for input into the pro; act review and permitting process, unless special legisla- tion removed those provisions. i~ N/5 Deborah Harmack -2- Yazch 3, 1987 r1 Possible Lead Agenciest A. A special bistate commission, created by state legislative action: Since no legislation hes yet been presented, the legislation could include many specific provisions on the method and responsibility for project ceview and permitting authority. participaeion in the preparation and adoption oL such legislation would be desicable. B. The State Public Otilities Commission: Sines both "best" routes propose using a utility corridor and sine this Commission has state authority in issuing a eeztilicat• of public convenience and necessity, as specified in the P.O.C. code Chapter 5, 'ASticl• 1 section 1001. Loz electri- cally powered ra it lines, this Commission could be the Lead Agency for California. IL it is, then the County could petition under section 1001 and thereby become able to participate in the review o! this project. C. Cal trans: Since both "but" routes are proposed next to much aL Intezsta to 1S, the State transportation department (with input Lzom SCAG and SANBAC) could be the Lead Ageney. This is especially likely since the Maglev profae! propose tc request the use of a portion of the existing Stat~ right-oL-wey alo nq this £zeeway. The County then could have input and peztic spate in project review through the SANBAC and SCAG Transportation Co:msittees. D. Federal Agency: It is possible that some Federal agency may bee ome the pcoj set proponent. Then the pcoj act review would become joint NE PA and CEQA environmental cev ie w, but the Sta is Lead Ageney would still ba unclear. Very likely the Lead Agency would be s State agency or a spacial bistate commission. At tachmenta Sii:SW: IAP:vy r 1 LJ y~l o ~,. in ~ ~ m. noromitment of mmy m IDidy Vegas tra ~ taatlhlYly reppaentt a new ptl- ~> backers study R~r;~~t.d°^ ~n d; d t 2nd terminal aeaoo .rmie,l is iv ~ ro the aae~ertl«WtltYaJ.ya~ida~.t aa. hemio.t m tbtara .odd fly PATRt/7C McGRBEVY warren the era's teamc i'he lASy Rapoet 3~i11a~ ' am ~ ~ ` Propmwtb at a sir-eqM train; ~ ~K+s~irad mo n ~ '. We a ~ ~ rtydy~ "Partom heLLav t !t )oo , N • reeved teemisal to AtlMim aprpd tht ddeea beswem two hh miSEt Rlleve the WtlL VaLLey at mkYh, the teak sad air epptlty some trattlc caKtltian and emaY. i ptvhlema wm M away" add Walsh . The amanncemeot came attar I ~itl Peesaotaaa b the SANBAG satev enmthtl~ d the Sao Rwaedl• ~ no Avaciavd Governmmta etitldted ~ _ ~~ d a proposed hFrtate rnmmiadon m'i L'te 52.5 61Dlon loin prolatd tl laclt• a ZsFmiL Nented reset 6alwam , Ontaeto and I.aa V el ~' oo whkh a ' train would tr W the iaaT+atae of iepaenatlm from San Btlnaedim (:aunty. ~ av ~ to 1SP mpb Now thrt atuditl have shoes the SA.\'HAG'a azeeutlw. hoed, which m'Maat to Oe t~ d a~ and teeMi. ~ b4 ~ J lo Nevyab Mamie eo^ o tl ~ ctttn, {owtnmeot ao d the rnunty set Apeil 1 (ar a voM m wttMhp to .~{ d a m t u hWII ~~ ~ ad • evert sa; _.~ or oppose fM t pevlect qtl ~m~si~aa. Welsh mW tM SANBA6 • A.J~cah ^ sernnd Southern `c-.r. temoai Ma Men talkM shod tl ' i Leq'•elatkn auttsvad h man Rideud Iota, R•Y~.1' y. npo aq raa the erdn peoJect e Sa TRAIN/A3 would enh m mwioa e~a~ae Iar'9"OAaa~1a m R a ~ ~ v m i ~ a )~ . tn the t@ h et aH. w tt syyfa t Ho S~ADRtil~tuaeedrn, hr cludinf Camty Saparviaor Ja !f>ti1s ...n eu~~.•.e. n.(/. '' '' '"'' _ _ _ JoEswn, tdd the wpwanan it wton` to rot Cn:arantp San Berna'dino Coc:.t• repttlenlatim oo the cwm- misaim . ~ t ourl C a6toteaa n y from Southern Cal![onda. bnt not specifically San Betttardiuo Catmtl'. Welsh aM SANBAG DtrecWr Wn McDadel promised to sat an am admen tledtaMflan fo rtr ~ ~ cater taper saedafkst. TM Importance o[ the was stressed by McDadaL whe Wd it app~vf Sa Haaaedlm treaty will have IIRIe canC'at avtT the nu at land tar fb. train PealecL He add tM coatmiaalae wfR hive authoM1ty for laetd•uee Aecitlans tl ion{ u tM hairs V kept wttMa the heewq• Apht•otway. ' eti Recoup 1M county ma ~ lase tvn• t~ 6vl of Ne Project k ter bl-slap cvnunWion, hoN Mikda aM McDatF lei seid it V impottaot the! SAA'RA6 ' take a ptlltion on the iseoJeet pert month ' y}/ ... ~.. r ~' t ne sun • =. ~ ~; D'on_ t_freeze. COllIIty OUt 3/asl~7 ~....- - '~ San Bernardino Couary officials take an unjus[ifiably dyspeptlc attitude toward the proposed high-speed Maglev [rain between Southern California and Las Vegas, but on at least one aspect of the situation, their concerais warranted. They are correct is sacing that legis- lation to create a twostate commission to carry out the 52.3 billion project gives the county sbon shrift is representation. As the Dill now stands, the seven Califor- nia members on the commission would all be appointed by state officials. Only four would be chosen Irom Southern California and none are guaranteed to be from S~~n Bernardino County. ' Ye[ the train, with iu Southern Califor• nia terminals proposed in Anaheim and On- tario, would follow a route to Las Vegas that would be almost rmm~ioreiy •,~;;h;,-, aan ternardino County. Supen•isor Barbara Riordan sa}~s she as been assured by Assembl9men Jerry Eases, D-Rialto, and Bill Leonard, R-Red- lands, that the bill can be amended to auar~ antee direct representation for San Bernar• ditto County. - Riordan said such an amendment would provide a "guardianship" with which she would "feel more comfortable." 4 ;.; It can. b¢ QebateQ:vihethei.so`m`e~c~tttity • nrlrnieie hen. heA eilNlninnf eennnae Inr cheU boatihry towarE:the°project:.,ITheii~ attitude bas bees that:ihe~tra3n world do ', tlittle but•slnd,locahdoDafs.Yp'las'Vegas'"~7 casinos,'ivbile c~eatlnQ iratfic and pollution ' problems at Sts terminals here.). However, their right to. betieard and xo have reasons- . ble access to the project's plimiug ]s oot a matter that should be debatab3e.'; = . ~~ 35hile the co$cerns expressed by the county~o[ilciairmay'not prevail Ya the long ~ i run, they.deserve to•have a place in they •giv! and take th'a't leads'to the final decia slog ~a process eaa be legitimate when a ' directly intererted party u completely ig~ ~ ~, L nored.• '' ... •~ A.a_wuy n.e, vtate.rna, 61st.-sa.ay. Ae.rds {, t m Las Vegas leaders push bullet train Businessmen express interest; SCAG skeptical ONTARIO (APl -- A deigadm d W Vegas, Nev.. Indwf an tl'Yte[ W persuade Ban fianardino Conaq' otRCials u r Dotb eoA d tb back in their Wore m edo ssgtpet fa a Wgh-sped tnln They oar hmlEb d • fllmph tram run b hotD ditados -Dot just W NevtWa, las Vegn Mayor BillBdue. Brian cod athe W Vega d• nosh deltstbtl Cher pbs far the bullet tole m'ILUr'ldaY io n Wet to win sryport Gam the Bmioea Devclopmmt Afambtlm d the In- laad £mpue, . pm-devtlwmmt grmp. mtweigh the palidve, WrJutlW{ the polmtLl au polludm from We tttin Th. Dbnn.d rwb for We train would rrm d7n mils De/wem W Vew am orruao daog tLe lo- tertut. 33 corridor sad woWdur- clu4 frog m Barstow and Yetm- riBe, +uPPartat+ saM. MageetlraLy levibtad train wpdd rorb speeds d ttp W td0 mph and waWd Duke the area-way D+D ie about 7o miouts. the Callfareb luaWm keden geaanBY reacted hvanbly m 1M rdr, aceading W Jae Jah.amea. WeauodatlmprsfdmL "i would MY that scar ae¢pita- tla4 averaB, b very much W favor d tM Irai4" Jahamsm sud "I kaow tome paopN nr It .du jrnt take psopN W W Vetpu, tut that hainwfB rtm in tgthdtlecdom." So far, 1ha profaat ham'[ marts past rht plamin{a4{e. Proponenb art seeking private Wvaton W support tlse protect, .. o::.u.sa i m cos sts billim W build Auer atudyWg We propoul, the Fedual B.ilrad Adtaioistratloo mnrJuded Int year War the pra7ect wn terrhbcaBy .od fmaodaliy feasible. "TDero b envy indiradm the fyatw will Pay tw shelf and make a Droet.. Why should we L{ Mhind twmtrin W 6ltrope and Asu?" uid ]art libby, ^ W Vegas developrt and CDaIfIDlo Of th! sly'! tafk tart! promotWg the train. Brlare Wid the Glifontia butieeu leaders spat high-speed nll lrempotLhm "b the mint sttuap{ and ncieiog concept W g<wrod trarrportatloa Ym rto 4 the tuft m do wmethiogabautlt" Tourub curainly woWd ale tM tr]in to ihattlt fn eM Iw„n ir. Vega. said pobert Penom, rho has served n DroleC manjV and Dow dots research far the caB(atvia Lepanment of TrampwLUOn. But Panom added the train also woWd De a geura! rnmmuter xr- htt red cau7d De 11se eginvalmt d a "filth airport" io southern CaDfartua. The Southern Glitarola Assotubm of Govcnmmb' n- ecutlve cwmmitlee {eswnlly °P poses use prapoeed Duller tn:4 said Peggy Sartm. a memhn d sDe comtmttee WDO assn u4 m tlK l'ictorvdle CSty comsat .'ds. Samar wd the SCAG appaxf Utt vaiu bemuse "We negatlvd Century Freeway Inc! LOS ANGELES (AP) - Com• pleuon a! the IongEeiaytd Ceanuy Fleewsy u warig ]De otw pro)eaU m a {l1 biWop, flue-year spendia( proposal by the Calilornia Departmml d hanporLtlm. ;Te pWt, rtleased FTlday, roo- uuu [.600 pro/ecb, rao{tng from new IreeWay! to bfghway maintenr., nun tranpasatlm and tall .vd, d, wd 61tran uded In five-year plan The projscb melude frwrways W Hlchmotld atndttoq sane Bar beta, Aubw and RwarlBe. Flmd! woWd rome hom federal lute and private soitrcv, WtludWg focal sass toss. 7L! !cab Tnaportatlm Com• milaim w111 Rvlew tlr plan and three d oral Wmpoeudm Dbm• W e hope bdarv d!lddln{ m the Misquoted The story W the BuodeY. Mar. t, Daily Pres. ahmt the preamehm made by W Vega Wtetvb m hrhelf d the MAGLEV Hipp speed tlain mipuels me. Sian t!>. project cvdd h.w a mejnr imym m our stns, I ftd it u oeteaury roelarHYmy W Cement Aa • drert eeidsd, I cam[nmtW fMt f wn hippy W lee Wet DM6 Vicraville end Barstow ate still beio/ trleaidbwd n powhle stole to the trai0. afDLe at ae ealBfr preamuuoa m SA.YBAG they W hem elinunated Mose people who have uad wiW rM shad tbv projeR agrwe fhal wades than b some benefit m w (ureh Y faaty teanspaAaltae m tM mebvpotllan area sad • Ieul crop! tkae can't much intsetlva b aaprert H. IDainy Twouae d the VLSIJAL poBUtim and me Wbsiaa inn aulifettyk. N • rtpreaaetlw d SCAG, I poielad out tM aooccrn of merahen of Wa Lhecutire Committee n roiled at tDe meetist{ I Wd !tt<odad aarller That dn. 1 dM eY thn trw a rtgiarvl plenniog standpoioL We aegadvn sewed u mtwai~ tke peievn, std gave u ae example th! need for ewpledm af. the laothill frteway, since be+aging trainloads d people inb 6etaao neD day woWd compound We rongndm m ova fseeways wNCh alrtady canarm ttgtnnl joveremmb. wri,crs v care JlAli FxeNtlve Committee had eumervua caoovs which 1 s.~"~"•~+ad vn W the sugt;slioe 18at they be anmisNred in the fugue plan. I did not lay tdt oc opposed dx mompt d DigL speed rail. and espttully oat m We Delis d ppootteenndel av poautloo. I have sem the MAGIFtr train W C/-rmaey sod ntlden an Ibe Bullet TnW in Japa4 and am convinced au pogutim from the trio. v Dot problem - it b We added polutlm from W creasing use d ran and Dunn W serve Wane who ride Wets W which is d mncCrt Anottxr carious mece[u b tWt the propmed legssladoe mrniog od d Sacwmto txovsde fora twoetate tam0ilbe m wink m the supmpeed traW project We behove Wt the fwncul wpact will Oe m Sao BerwWoo and Clark (Ntwdal ceuetln and it would oNy be sDDroDnate b Fur< W mmmtttee members chato Iron tlroaecotmfke. Thu u lmtMr example d the [seed for people who wiB be Maud W let thru gov ernmenbl rcpraarutlvn k+aw how thtY feel spout pro)ecb wAlch wW have gtset Impact on 'hetr lifntyle. Peggy$rrtor VicWiville c'~ 3 SwCaA.NE.4T0 OFFtG[ Suu C.prol Glifib !9161 Y3~M) DISTIUC70'FI(;a 31t 8. awtln., SWa D RWw.ICafo93)16 .~ssPmblg ~FIlL~AL'LtiM ~P~iBjtt~P JERRY EAVES ASANaL'MAN,lIXNSI%TII DaTlllcf W ~I~ TIY CITO ~n0 CD.vNMmo p IIUtA L .OIYIIDDq RMGfiI MnW.0N4W aOd.11ND1pN. MDIn[b March 19, 1981 Deu SAMBA ~ ers CONNf:~EaS. nw,V.O nMp D3L YlA7 Cl4u4Yn. L~W.fO.Mtvr .so Da.yun IMI:ILVQ A'KVMNf'R Mp.'DMD MDCOMY CITY 1CGlDWU,lucrt ,wm~obt.vIap~r,^ ~l ~wrMnnT' o~.j~mr. I .AIl 4 •! ~~0~ iAn eRMLmW +aaut® cons As the County's elected npruantativu in Sacramb3ato, ae joined as eoauthor• o! AE 1079, a musure to eraate a joint commission betaaen California and Mevada to svalnata, oversee and coordinate a pouiDle ioint high speed rail project. We beliwa it is important to Sap Bernardino that we take thi^ leadership position rather than to allow legislator rsprsuntlnq other area to make important decisions the! will a!leet enr communities. 'Phereiore, we urge your support o! Af iB3f. It is our positien tbat it is premature and would not be in th• beat interest d! San Dernardino Couaty to take as utive position either !or or agaiast any pattienlu rail system proposal at this time. Ne arge SADiBAC Lo join ns in noL taking a stand on any partienlar system. Already, because of oar •!lorts we have bean able to insist on amendments to the original Gill !bat will require at lout tao members of the Commission to be !ram San Bernardino County -- and, with your support we shall coneinus eo sea to it that our rya^','e i !crests :a: .upecced. w• era concerned that a premature vote by an organization like the San Barnardlno Aasaciation o! eovernmants, would cripple our e!lorts to Y.aep key decisions in the hands o! those who know and understand the needs of Ban Bernardino. The start a! any rail program is at lust two to three years away. Th• only actiop 6einq taken nos i• the creation o! a commission to evaluate the proposals, to study possible route^ and to coordinate future decisions. It is to our advantage to play a major role in any such coamission and for that reason, at this time, rather than voting on the rail system, ws urge you to cast a vote in favor o! the creation o! the Commission. Th a..-.k you for your time and ef!ozts on bshal! o! oar county. BIL~~LRD 4..:.. a,...b S /Jn.. a v~ 1'NPawL Sincerely, ~ y4/ J TSY SAVES LC ~~~~f • CJ twtsoat+u ucmwtuu-wra u~vus sono~ ASSEMBLY BILL No. 1839 C 1,~. ~~ M• fly Messber Lts • :M G~[ a~. ( coauthor: Senator Deddeh- b• Jr (Co~uthas< Asseoblr Member Allen, Daanb Drown, Costa, eCN ~ ~ Dul#~. D~ar+a. Fan, Floyd, Hill, Jabmtoa, Iwonud, s0 -~1 Iww4, Mojoonier, Momejor. Tolatsco, StirWsg, and C [ ! 7uelur) ;. • O 1 (Coauthors: Senator Campbell, FJlis. Yeene, and Aogers) March 0. 19B! An act to add Tlek >4 (mnrnereeing with Seetlon 83000) to the Government Code, reLtlag to lramportation. suvums poutans peen AB 1838, u 6stroduced, Matz. Transportation: high speed rail. F.~ristlng law does not establish a joint canmWion between i;aiifornia and Nevada to oversee the comeruction of a high speed nil system between fps Vegas, Nevada and southern rnia. This tsW wouttt enaM m tnterrtate compact to create the C~liforda•Nevada Super Speed Ground Transportahon Commission. The commission would be composed of T member from each state and would be requved to secure a rightafvwy apd award a frmchise for the mmtruction and • , operatlon of • mPm speed transportation system. at iv • ! 1 `' no e:pease to the Stated principally following the O ~ L ( routsef Iatentate 15 betwam Ls Vega, Nevada, and • point C ~ -) in southern CalUoroia. The bill would specify the authority d O ~ i ( the cammisdae to accomplish this requirement. C. / ~ Vote: myority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. O t . ( ~.~ Sate•mmdated local program: no. C ~ ". O lR t • >D Nx~ Aa 1838 _g_ • 7ne people of rbe salt d C.G16rni. ~ aucr.: rarro»,. 1 SECTION 1. 'Title 14 ( w1t6 Sacdon O I ~~) 4 Y3000) b added to the Ceverames-t~t, m rad: • :^ li 3 a~ C r ~ TTTLE 1!. CALIFORNUI•NEVADA SUPER SPEED b• :+ t~ S GROUND TRANSPORTATION COMPACT aCy1 ti ['. 6 _ ~ ?t~i 7 93000. The LgWNu» of California 6treby ntifies • O ~ 9 and apprwat the "Glifaraia•Ntvada g~p~r swed h round Tnmsportatkn Cara n set fort beb ~ 10 93001. The provbfons a thb bstersate compact 11 executed between the State of Nevada atd California 14 arc as followr. 13 1~ Cat.ttoaNtw-Nsvaaw St~rttt St~to Gaotrtm iS 7lusrsroarwnora Cosa~ACr 16 17 ARTICLE I. DECLARATIONS.pQF PO CY . ,,~ ~ 18 19 Cers~dt-aM ~"*ped, (a) It b laud and declared that the of this YO compact b s decoration of kagWative int t that ~~~ f C d S l f d N l 41 tates o ornia an eva a Joint a i y pursue 42 development of a super speed pound transportation 43 system connecting southern California with southern ?A Nevada: 4S (b) The syrtem will serve the following public 46 purposes: 27 (1) Provide economic benefits to both southern 28 California sad southern Nevada. 49 (4) Reduce rcUance oa gasoline and dice! fueled 30 engines and enrntsrage the use of altesisadve energy 31 sources. Q ~ r 32 (3) Reduce oongestlas oa Interstate 15 between O ~ : 1 ~ southem California and Lu Vegn. ~ i ` 31 (~) Provide a working examvle for a rtateofthe•art O ~ ~ _ . 1 35 trensportatioa system that could play an essential role in G i ~ the dtvebpmeat of future commuter service in the Los O i. 1 ~ Mgtles basin and the l.u Vegas valley. r i ~ .- 38 (S) Provide quick and convenient transportation Olt _ 1 w m • yd~ -3- es ltii • ~ 1 aeevla fa ratidmts .ua vtsitan viretna m southaro Gdktota aad t Newda. 4 A1117t3„E II. DEF1Ni170N5 C t+/~ a • :•) a (•) "Comttdadm" meeot the Ca1N'ortsi.-Nevada Super !;'t a: t 7 ~ G a Seed Wattud Traoeporatlon Commirioa ` ° ats ~ r saeth.rn oluo~l. ro) ~ dk couutMa aF Las !^rl tit[ a Aoaelaa, Onoaq A(veritle, cad San eern.rtl>rso. b :~.) 10 (t:) C d ~ A111'ICI.E II4 ORGANIZATION ~ 13 (a) '!Acre 8 seated tht CeHdorda•Neveda Super is ~ Cramd rrempowetoo Commidon as a reper.ce s 16 1 ~ 'ib ~ 1T e tlt d ~y ~( ~ ~ le t:ooa ttta u owx bt ni.denl ot kns~ wo u#~ 1 OalVarstia deksptiosS~ ~ ~^ ~^~,~ ~«~~ Three members eppotuted by the Governor of ` ~ h-o od whom sha0 be raddenb of U eosKherD CeWam(L Si (B) Two members appointed by the Senate ~ masse of whom rhaR be a iN b raldeot d>DO • 9S ~ 46 (C) Two member epyolnted by the Speaker of the Assembl at l t ? h 6 1 y, eas osse o w om s a 1 be a resident of 47 4a fOnthlfn C~Ninr..t. Mahch~~n9 numbe.•o('~twa ce.~s~~w+e: (_) Nevada :~ by M1ltvod0 SIOtu/t• _- ~ (A) M 1LrL ~l ~ Orl slsall eleM One of its membeff to ` l ~ ehdiman. 31 AN77t3.E N. POWERS AIMD DI.TIES G 1 F-~ 3S 38 (a) rbe commissiors slap secure a ritht•ofway and 0 ~ % s 3T award a tranehiae !or the construction and operation of a C ~ t ( 38• aupet stfeed SrOUDd ttaosportatlon system at no expenx O ~ ~ - -s ~ to the Mate of Gli(ortsia principally /ollowfna the route L ~ ~ N' d0 of lnterstate7•I-Qhway IS between the Ciq• of Las Vegas, O i. / • r ~ O lR t - b (C~ ~~S~.~evS~eed Ground TCns~orlc-ltov~~~fs}e~riv MenhS~ 4 SyS+eM '~1Q~ C¢rr~lS r~movily Passengers and operaaes or, - q .rode 1 xP<ro~Fed d~edicaled ~uideu~ a. ~~ ~ ~~a `•'1 ~ ~i# 195 miles per hau; 4~ 7 ss na9 -~- 1 Nevada, and • point io rottthasa CalJorda. ~)} ! (b) '11ts easomisdon may do arty of the 3 ~ (1) /legttire a pia cootrai a rata of land u A i d d~ l t f t U m ~ ~ -waY. / oas. aA aac ary uw ro r t ~o a O 1 pay S purchua, giR. laara, ttsa permit. a asstament. • :- 1: 6 (!) Caadtsct aoattaariq and other ritsdfaa ralatad to a~r a: a 1 7 the aalactloa and of e4~ay and the it d t t Y t bi t d di d . b• ~,. ~ r sae, tt ng, no m e raae n o. reLetlaa . K.'rM tt; t ' ~ 9 eavirartntaaW hnpact stttdta. aocioacaoomk 6apact b :<a t- 10 setsaia, and finaocW ' studla. All loca4 rate. C r C y II .era fadard aavlmmnentd nqutnmenb w91 be diet by . ~ O 1! ma comsoiaroo. .... , ba olog fes rpeed , (S) bvalttate aharnat ~sapat 1 d a ~t fr ~ ~ IS id opana t~ r+>tiei tpaad rail system between at I6 rotttheen CalKada anti In Vapa 17 (~) &ablish csites4 far the award of the franchise. 18 (S) AcwPt Qaab. gdb. u.a. anti a9ocatloas tran 19 90 Nawda a ib poYtlal sabdivldom, Wa taderal sov~att. fonipt 9ovarnmmb, dad any atM priwte M t h f btl b 0 b ' gl a e o a eras to r o o no po hars s a sottrcas. 4 >>g Gllfaroia err arty of i4 poWkal wtbdlvWaos. tlt t ll b b b d S;f e as dot cam u t t a ut tlib e (r/ Ifnse dom. p obUptfon of tht Sate of California a Nevrda, a an~ 2S their politial subdivisbm. 46 (7) Hire an aaecntlw aificer, other staff, and any. >n coruultana deamad appropriate. 28 (g) Sebct the sect reuse and terminal sites. SY 1b/ voiriu. G ',!'! !~ awlected franchisee in 30 obtaitring J1 necesnty permits and certificates from 31 governmental entitles in Ca9forda and Nevada. 34 (c) The caao~iasioo shat be and is hereby declared 33 and created a corporate body. It shall have the power to 3• sue and be sued, !o CantraCt and be contracted with. and ~ _ " to haw and poetess aU of the powers of a corporation. It C 1 F - "-". i ~ play ~ a c0rp0iat° Baal' Cowes of Sts proceedings. O ~; a ~ records, and acts, whoa wtbanticated, shall be admissible C ~ t s 38 in evidence in all cottth of tither sate and shall be prima O ~ e _ _ 39 facie evidences of the truth of aU statements therein. G , : _ „ 1 O is 7 C ~ r .. - 1 OlR - _ _ ss ua NAP ~° .. r-~ ~~ C1 .~ r.~ •~ ct ~~ c ~. su c ~~ oc c ~. or c~~ o c~ - -a- w, us i AIITlQ~ V. 'MMQYA710N 3 (~- -Wrww~tt~6~Y a rrw.~.u. C ~~ yr, sunsc}~ C (, ~ o ~o~ (` W~ yz9 rv_ SUMMARY OF AB 1839 Basically, the bill would: o create a Bi-state Commission betaeen California and Nevada (at no cost to the state of California) to consider a possible Super Spaad Train betaeen Las Vegas and Southern California - o the commission would: _ - decide on the route and beat Southern California destination(s) (working with the various cities being considered and/oz the eitiea wanting to be considered) - obtain all permits and right-of-ways needed - conduct engineering and other studies (including an - ELR) to meat all state and Yadaral environmental requireaents - select the franchisee to build the train (the Freneh, Germans, or Japanese) if the commission decides to proceed ~. - attract the proper_financing toz the project ($2.5- • billion) et no cost to the State of California (i.e. the franchisee chosen will be expected to finance the projset) - sunset soon after its posers and duties have been performed (oroi acted 1 S ro s r,.mT: ems:.... :.- .w _,._ . ......------' __ _.._-.. ..c four years) As you know, a ei-state Commission requires both states to enact substantively identical legislation. Due to the fact that the Nevada legislature is only in session every two years (they are in this year until late May/early June) no substantive changes may be made after the Nevada Legislature adjourns this year. The proposed amendments to AB 1879 to date are: 1. Remove "fiscal committee" referral if possible. (The Commission has no state fiscal costs or revenues.) 2. Add a "Super Speed Ground Transportation System" definition. N3a Add a s citic "sunset" date. (We do not want this Co®ies on to be anything like the Tahoe Regional planning Authority.) 4. Desic~(nate that at least two of the California appointments be from San Bernar3~o Countv. 5. A technical amendment taking the "Chairman" selection out of the Nevada section and making it a separate item #3. 6. Change the make-up of the size of and vho selects how many appointaents to the Commission. (As drafted, the Comission would M aade up of 7 members fros each state. Wa are still working with Governor Deukajian and his staff on the number of appointments he will need to •ign-off on the legislation. It is safe to say he will want at least one sore than the bill currently gives him. Therefore, until the negotiations ere completed, we do not know exactly how many memberm will be on the Commission, although the total number im not expected to be more than 18. Regardless of how many California chows ae the magic number, an iden[ical number will be amended into the gwada bill.) • 7. Amend language to ensure more flexibility in determining the final outcose of the Coniaaion's findings. - Cuu..i uoiuu: setting up the Bi-state Commission due not mandate nor guarantee the Super speed Train between Lea Vegas and Southern California will becoms a reality. However, without passage of the Commission this year in both California end Nevada, we all are certain to lose the idea...the technology...and the franchisee financing to Texas or Florida (the two other U.S. areas pushing for the first super Speed Train). A copy of amendments that are being incorporated into AB 1819 are attached. These improvements were suggested by Assemblymen Eaves and Leonard. r L yai INTEROFFICE MEMO DATE Marti 30, 1987 PHONE 387-1824 FROM FAZLE RAB QUAD~Senior Executive Analyst Bond of Supervisors Government Relations TO JOHN QUIMBV, Legislative Advocate County of San Bemardino t.n Coq M See aterei SUBJECT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS POSITION ON SUPERSPEED TRAIN AND AB 1839 The Board of Supervifors of tM Counry of San Bernardino reviewed and discussed the four alMrnativa in the attacMd memo and adopted the four[h alternative as its position an the Maglev Project and AB 1839. The Coun[7/s position is: Qwlified apposition [o AB 1839- The elements that must W atnettded into tM bill ';~, for tM Counry to support tM Igislation ue: t Element A: Amend tM composition of the Bi-state Commission to require that eM seven member Glifornia DNegation provide for: (1) Two members to be nominated by the Board of Supervisor of tM County of $an Bernardino and appointed by tM Governor of California. l2I Two members [o bt nominated by the San Borodino County Transportation Commission and apeoinr.A 1.1, .h. Ct :_; -« of Lal ItOrnia. (37 The remaining three members to be appointed by tM Governor of Csli/ornia, Senate Commietae on Rules, and tM Speaker of tM Assembly. Element 8: Statutory requirement that the first duty of the Bi-state Commission shall be to complete a full Environmental Impact Study and other associated final studies. Some arus that must be addressed include: consumer spending imbalance to Southern California degradation of air qualiey in the region maatxconomie imwtt to eM California market far the continued operation - eventual isswnu of tax frx bonds to repay foreign government initial rapitahcos[ lestimated at approximately 52.5 billion in 1981 dollars). ,,., ~....,., y s 1 Element C: Statutory rewirement for full mitigation of localized impact at the train terminals. Some impacts that will require mitigation include: • surfatt street access congestion • freeway access congestion • may require up to a full freeway lane Element D: Statutory requirement to establish a major maintenance facility in Barstow/Viccorvilla area to compensate for Ions of motor vehicle travel related business. Element E: Delete project implementation authoriey granted in AB 1839 to the Bi•state Commission at this time. Attachment FRQ;bm • ~/ 3 3 1N 1 tHUrrIC,G Mt tU ' DATE Marti 30, 1987 PRONE 387.4824 FROM FAZLE RAB QUAD enior Executive Analyst Board of Supervisors Government Relations TO THE HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SUBJECT POSITION ON SUPERSPElb TRAIN ANO A8 1839 Recommendation: tr ~:•. ~~a ~ ~,,~~~~` ~~~ CaYSrf or sss Movois TALKING PAPER Ft; a CL'UNTy PC517iC~ Adopt qualified opposition to A8 1839 with statement to change position to "support" if amended to incorporate identifed provisions. MAGLEV PROTECT POSITION ALTERNATIVES ALTERNATIVE I ~ Oppose the Maglev Project outright unless the project proponent demonstrate by ra[egorirally identifying: a. how the negative impacts of the project are to Fie mitigated, and b. how the project will have beneficial impact [o ;he County. ALTERNATIVE II F..nrer, t rr . t fpr ~ 3vydi iye~ti vain concept. ALTERNATIVE III Express support for AB 1839 as amended to provide for two members of the California delegation to be residents of the County of San Bernardino. ALTERNATIVE IV Express qualified apposition to AB 1839 and identify eleme-.ts necessary to support the legislation. u. nrt y3Y l a~ co te~~te cn ~~ 5tace com oJS~{o~~' uPe~{sots of ~ i. ~a `i`O^ o{ ~ aQe\e6ai~oo P e eoafd °{ 5 COUncY t ansP° men`s compo~ Ga\'~fOt aPP°~n ` SbY e~a~d~oo `o ~~~a POSS`b\e ~\P~ Ptie ~~~a~ne ~~of Sa eetnacd ceaby he Sang by Saota~(n Ga\'~f° cd g\ecnan lU .\` e Go~ncY f `o ~ appo~n co ~ a~\ ~ i°F ~c C,o o hy~\'~"~~ One ~"~ 5 `on' cnam~o{ wh°m s d`e g S~~dJ and 1 ocnR` fou< `ne n cV o{ cc l1 G fema`n`~gae \easc a {1c ~ e~ca\ \enPa l3~ Govet~ ~ Een~ 4u\\Env~~o m ~: f~~a ,~~otY o coR'0 e a dressed lnq\° ouch~~n GaR ec ove~nmenc '~\e~^en~g s(n\a~ud`e sct+a~m~ss~a~c(`bacY ~ HGa\A`of `ate°~~Y25b`gn° `n Some area e~ sDeoaas gOao~ eO °~y~\ 4~ee bO adi\6`a~e{Y S as she consu Edon ~~c `(nP ued ~ ca* ~ ap7 pace ~a econ° oni` ce o c~ a ed Un dmac~gfeJ~P~~` ``ost lesi`ma m`"gac`on o4 \u ~\`z ~ 984'\\a~ fe'~\femanc {or fu\\ 6e m e 9ai~on ~no~°ie• \n e\ ' S~a`o~oe°M~na\s. at ~`\\ ~eqO ongesi~on av \a,e ce fai`„~~\~ e~av g\emenc G~' cc5 ~e.`tnPages ~5 ~e~ss c~esRBS~o a {u\\ free a~o~ r\~yn of~m°~~ ve tO UnPteo ene . ~ s{t~eWa~naY `cq...en~ ~o?o ~°\inPen a e fOt..,<.l,\ss`E Svys~q°en \eP`s\a fe~~~v`\\e a~" g uP n Pa5~ ;e " ,~eo 0 ear oab~s~aess, emene a oP6~ac~we e'ex~\ude~ c\e•~ ~e\a equa ~ogtn \n~\ud S~a~u X01 cs w \\ ncac`On co \r^e~c E~' ehe P 1. mo\eR`e se\e`C`on _._____. ~ Qgf one <et~`n bt5°n a`gU\5o^°n " SO~~hc"Of "i`Onyl(V~C ~~ Oe. _ ad~nA 4a ' P ~3> '~;. :, ~ ~, ~ _ . ~"`"'~~ '`s ,q ~~~" ~~ / ~ . yJ, ~ ~f7 .,r ~~ s HIGHLIGHTS OP THE CALIFORNIA/NEVADA SUPER SPEED TRAZN -- BENEFITS TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA -- 1. Private industry will build and operate the system. 2. The system will open up a new market of Southern California visitors. Many of the 9-10 million "non- Southern Californian" Las Vegas visitors will be attracted to Southern California as a result of the new super speed system. 3. In 1995, 3.6 million people, increasing to 5 million people in the year 2025, who are Southern California residents or Southern California visitors, will want to ride the system, according to a study by Barton Aschman Associetes using a state-of-tha-art computer model. These statistics clearly show that demand for the system exists. 4. The project will showcase a state-of-the-art, futuristic transportation technology that will likely have other applications in California. In other words, routes from ca,. pr~....trcc tc ,__ ~agalaa ~~ i.uy Ai~yeies co San Oiego may be considered in the future. 5. The system has the potential to serve as commuter transportation in Southern California. Possible routes would be Victorville to Ontario to Corona to Anaheim. 6. The system will generate many real estate development opportunities in the terminal area that will result in new property and sales tax to the local entities. 7. over $1 billion will be spent in Southern California during th? construction period, since 80 percent of the system will be built in California. e. System headquarters and maintenance facilities will be located in San Bernardino County. In addition to generating new jobs, this location also will result in millions of dollars of system revenues to be banked in San Bernardino County financial institutions. The worldwide interest in this unique system will put San Bernardino County and the terminus city on the map. 10. The Super Speed Train will provide a new link to an efficient, uncongested, easily accessible international airport -- Las Vagas~s Mecarran International Airport, a quick 9o-minute ride (maximum) away. l SUMMARY OF AB 1839 Basically, the bill would: o create a Bi-state Commission between California and Nevada (at no cost to the state of California) to consider a possible Super Speed Train between Las Vegas and Southern California o the Commission would: - decide on the route and best Southern California destination(s) (working with the various cities being considered and/or the cities wanting to be considered) obtain all permits and right-of-ways needed - conduct engineering and other studies (including an EIR) to meet all state and federal environmental requirements - select the franchisee to build the train (the French, Germane, or Japanese) if the Commission decides to proceed - attract the proper financing for the project ($2.5 billion) at no cost to the State of California (i.e. the franchisee chosen will be expected to finance the project) - ao~., aLLac ils powers and duties nave been performed (projected life of Commission is three to four years) As you know, a Bi-state Commission requires both states to enact substantively identical legislation. Due to the fact that the Nevada legislature is only in session every two years (they are in this year until late May/early June) no substantive changes may be made after the Nevada Legislature adjourns this year. The proposed amendments to AB 1839 to date are: 1. Remove "fiscal committee" referral if possible. (The Commission has no state fiscal costs or revenues.) 2. Add a "Super Speed Ground Transportation System" definition. 3. Add a specific ^aunsat^ date. (We do not want this Commies on be anything like the Tahoe Regional planning Authority.) 4. Desi ate that at least two of the California appo ntmenta be from San Bernardino County. 5. A technical amendment taking the "Chairman" selection out of the Nevada section and making it a separate item }'3. 6. Change the make-up of the size of and who selects how many appointments to the Commission. (As drafted, the Commission would be made up of 7 members from each state. We are still working with Governor Deukmejian and his atnff on the number of appointments ha will need to sign-off on the legislation. It ie safe to sey he will want at least one more than the bill currently gives him. Therefore, until the negotiations are completed, we do not know exactly how many members will be on the commission, although the total number is not expected to be sore than 18. Regardless of how many California choeea es the magic number, an identical number will be emended into the Nevada bill.) 7. Amend language to ensure more flexibility in determining the Yinal outcome of the Commiasion~s findings. conclusion: Setting up the Bi-state commission does not mandate nor guarantee the Super Speed Train between Las Vegas and Southern California will become a reality. However, without passage of the Commission this year in both California and Nevada, we all are certain to lose the idea...the technology...and the franchisee financing to Texas or Florida (the two other U.S. areas pushing for the first Svper Speed Train). A copy of amendments that era being incorporated into AB 1839 are attached. These improvements were suggested by Assemblymen Eaves and Leonard. AMENDlfENTS To AB 1879 (KAT2) - Am introduced: March S, 1987 Amendment one In the heading, strike out "Mountjoy" Amendment Two on page 2, line 21, after the word "jointly", inaart: consider, and if justified Amendment Three On page 3, line 10, insert: (c) "Super Speed Ground Transportation System^ means a system that is capable of speeds of at least 180 miles per hour, that carries primarily passengers and operates on a grade separated, dedicated guideway. Amendment Four On page 3, line 18, after the word ^delegation", insert: at least two members of which shall be residents of San Bernardino County Amendment Five On page 3, lines 29 and 30, delete, "appointed by the Governor of Nevada" and insert: annninteA ae rnm,ir"A by Nuvaria l.y. Amendment Six On page 3, line 31, strike out "B" and insert: 3 Amendment Seven On page 3, line 36, strike out "shall" and insert: may Amendment Eight on page 5, delete lines 3 through 5, inclusive, and insert: This title shall remain in effect only until January 1, 1992, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, which is enacted before January 1, 1992, Deletes or extends that date. '. C+1tJ~'Oalila Ilf:mwltlar~IlA~ aarvswa sltnor: ASSEMBLY BILL No. 1839 C I,eF. Introduead ~, Assembly Member Kass • :y ,C,~ k . (Friacipal caautlsu: Senator Deddeh) p. ~ (Cowthone Awambly Member Allen, Dennis Brown, Costa, CM ~ ~_! Duplisrea, Fawn. Fur, Floyd 1671. Iohmton, 1.eonu'd, s0 .'M 1aw1i. Mojonnier, MounVoY. Polanco, Stvlirtg, and C ~ f' Tuekar) :. ~ O 1 (Cwuthors: Senators Campbell, Ellit, Keene, and Aogers) March S, 19B! M aM to add Title Ig (commencing with Section 93000) to the Government Code, relating to transportation. tEG75U71VE C~M1NSEl.S DICGtT AS 1g39, as introduced, Katz. Transportation: high speed rail. E~dsting Lw does not establish a joint commission between California and Nevada to oversee the cwnstruction of a high speed rail system between l.ss Vegas, Nevada and southern uuiomia. This bill would enact an interstate compact to create the California•Nevada Super Speed Ground Transportation Commission. The romm+•~on would be composed of 7 member from each state and would be requved to secure a rightof-way sad award a franchise For the construcdan and - , ) operation of a super speed ground transportation rystem, at G I f ! ` no expense to the State of California, principally following the O ~ : ( routeof Interstate 13 between lit Vegas, Nevada, and a point C ~ ~) in southern California.l7~e bill would specify the authority of O ~i ( the commission to accomplish this requirement. (: 1 i Vote: m~ority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal rnmmittee: yes. G .~ ~( ~. State-mandated local program: no. O It w so AH 183Y -_- ne peepk of the Sfate alAfikrab do enact ar iolbax 1 SEC170N 1. Titk 14 ( with Section ~ O 1.x+'7 3 93000) b tided to the Governotett t Code. to nad: ~ :~ 1t r+'9 ~ e + TITLE lY. CALIFOANIA-NEVADA SUPEA SPEED b• -j >! ' S GAOVND TRANSPOATATION COMPACT ACM t1- ~ . g "0 ?--~ 7 93000. The Legislature of CaUforWa hereby ntifies ( B anda es the "CaUforsda•Nevada Super o ~ • O "' 9 0 Ground Transportation ConpaM" as set forth bcl w 9300 Th 1 1. e provisions of this interrtate compact 11 executed between the States of Nevada and California 12 att at follows: 13 14 CAL(FOPNL-•NEVADA SwEtt SPEEp GnovND 1S TtiANSPOA7'A770N COYPACf 16 17 18 ARTICLE I. DECLARATIONS~F PO t':S Cons r and li~'~.~.;A~ed, 19 , (a) It b found and declared that the pave of this 40 compsM b a decbntion of kgisbtive int t that the 41 States of CaUfornia and Nevada Jointly pursue the Q2 development of a super speed ground transportatlon Si rystem rnnnecting southern California wiN southern 89 Nevada. 45 (D) The rystem will serve the following public 46 purposes: 47 (1) Provide economic benefits to both southern 28 California and southern Nevada. 29 (2) Aeduce reUantt on gasoline and diesel fueled 30 engines and encourage the use of alternative energy 31 sourtts. O f F-~ ~ (3) Reduce congestlon on ]nterstate 15 between 0 ~: ~ 33 southern California and Las vegan. o A ` 3+ (+) Provide .working example for . stateoFthe-art t) ~ ~ . ( 35 transportation system that could play an essential role in G / 36 the development of future commuter fervitt in the Los O i. t 37 Angeles basin and the Las Vegas valley. G A .. 38 (Sj Provide quick and rnnvenient trantportaHan O lit '. / K 70 -a- ti lao • ~' 1 aarvfoe for rddmn and vWtoes vesting !o rottdtern : t~ornr ta-a Nevada a _. • ARTICLE II. DEFiNT110NS 0 :~) d (o) "Cammi>aim'tnenntthe Glifornia-NevodaSuper •(;~ ~: st, ~ C 7 Speed Cronnd Traosportatfat Cosnmissiott. f t W th c ti h G " - p ~ } I 8 er o nr means e omt ern . ad. (b) Sout !"M ti t[ 9 Angeles. Off. Ahrorside, and San Bernardino. ~ :9,) 10 (e) G ~ < < it ARTICLE III. ORGANIZATION • L 1 13 (a) There h crated the: Qliforaia-Nevada Super 1• d Gramd Tramportatlon Commiraion as a reparate e e S p i e ~ a l ll D i i h h d f o e b ' ~a ~ 18 a e e comm s s on s y o t he g roing o l 17 IB - r constituted as folbwx !Of ItYb* MJD ~+1 ulhom aAall be rti~dtAiS atiot of soy, Be.nord,.ao co..vrtyl I Glifomia dek g members appointed by the Governor of • ~ SII two of whom shall be residents of l so+rt tun ffi (B) 7rvo members appointed by the Senate SAt Committee an Auks, at kart one oI whom shall be e ffi resident of southern Gliforrtia. b 2S (C) Two member appointed br the Speaker of the ` 46 Assembly, at least oae of whom shall be a resident o! Y7 southemCslifornia. Ma1~ti;~9numbvo!'membvs co.~sf~+u~<d SB (2) Nevada del tbn: ~ ny Ne~odo slat~ne. 29 (A) 3o Al Alevaaa. The crommission shall elect one of its members to ~ l 3~ ~ chsirman. b ~ ~• ARncl.e rv. powsAS Ai\D DI,TIFS G 1 r-t 36 (a) The cwmsnixsion secure s nght-of-way and O 1: r 37 awed a franchise for the construction and operation of a G ~ ~ ( 38 • super speed ground transportation ryrtem at no expense O li -'s 39 to the State of California principally following the route L i /~` 10 of Interltate~lighway IS between the City of Ls Vegas, 01~ r ~ Olk / w . (C) ~~`x.Qea' Seed 6xa.r,d TunsQor4ahov~ 54siernv Means: a system •i4~u* [n.rr~es Pnmaril~ P°s~"~u's ar,d operaaes or, o, cSrede SePeroAead~ded~caled ~utdewtk{ J~ -}ram ~ ~ed3"O~' u~ lQpi~• 185 miles der hou+: ws la! -+- 1 Nevada, and a point is sotrtliern Cvifornia. ! (b) 'fie commwon my do my ar the 3 (1) Acgtdra or gain cmtrd or ttse of for -- ~ rilltt-of-waY. Matiaos, tod at-eillary toes dtrou~h O 1,~~'ll 6 purchase, giR, lase. toe permit, or easement. • :` l: 6 (!) Ceoduct aoghseeriog and other studies ratted to 1N a. t ! sO•_a i : 7 8 the selecelon and acqulaltiao of rilht-0f-way aatd the franchbee iadttdltt but not Ymited to le ti f - < , l, , se c on o a aG'M ti ti ">) 9 enviroomeaw impact sttttiles, sodoecwnamic impact b :'a_'s- 10 studies, and lioancial feasusWty studio. All local, state, C f F r 11 and tederat environmmw retptiremenb caul be met by :. ~ O 1! the eemmbdoo. - - ~• l3 (3) Evahtate alterrudve meet speed rau technologies, 11 systems, and operator, and select • franchisee to build iS and operate the super speed rau system between 18 southern CaLfornia and Ls Vegas. 17 (~) Establb6 criter4 fa the award of the franchise. 18 (S) Accept grantr, glib, feer. and allocad~s from 19 Nevada or ib poBtical abdivisions, the federal !D 41 government, fomtps govaamenb, artd any other private ubNe cost to the Stat¢ of 7ltere shall 6e no sources !! p . Califwoia a any of ib voudcal subdividooe. 23 (8) hmre debt. but dds debt shad not constitute an 4A obligation of the Stator of r'-K~s- ar Nevada, or any of !S their poNdcal subdividoos. ~ (T} Hire an executive officer, other Hoff, and any !T Conttdtanb deemed appropritte. Y8 (B) Select the exact route and terminal sites. 49 (9) UDtafn, Or amst tDe selected franchsee m 3l1 obtaining all necessary permib and CerdfiMtES from 31 governmental entities in California and Nevada. 32 (c) The commission shall be and is hereby declared 33 and created a rnrporate body. ]t sha116ave the power to 34 sue and be sued, to contraM and be contracted with, and C f F - - i ~ to have and possess aU of the powers of a corporation. It - - . 36 may adopt • corporate aesL Copies of its proceedings. O ~I ~ 3T records, and acts, when authenticated, shall be admissible C ~ • s 38 in evidence in all courts of either mate and shall be prima _ O l i - -- ~ 39 facie evidence of fhe forth of au statements therein. G ~ ..1 O 1: ~ ~1 - ! tilt- - ~ w~ .)w _! ), ... / _s- Ai 1~ ~ ~ rumctE v. rEx~~noN s 3 (a) -W~esweaM'~IrY 4 • S ~MMa• C ~4 yr. sunse~~ •ra ~~ c~ ~~ C ° ~_~~ C t~ O if C 1w OG G 1± O (_ ~~ C ~ ~ O C~ N IfD a ~2~ ~yy~yR aPw YY ~ ~ p~~' c~fi~8 28~'s~ o..~c~ °~.e39 '°0~6 9G' ae~; $~~ cc^ v 9^^ aR3o'a v,S~ m'gpf C p ~m OOp CJ d ~~ Box G~~x ~°a~z ~ ° m o^m 6~'~^^ 9~p ~b~ ~~App 0^O 600 ^~~^H ^~o _a,~, ~6i~ ~^ 6~ C ^ ~E~ nEg ~a~ ~°e 0 ~' ~~ r~~°ep a» & E^ og•ddd~W 0 o^r g'^r P T.., ~„+y0 < q~ OF. wOCC ~_.. .. o' : ~ :. ' A? Ro°. &.~60& „os ^~ c mP~ ^ryN ~C m ~w ~~ ~^Fn e ~7.o a~~'? ~°! a_w';fD 3^mw S m ~' O' O a ^COO C,m Jr •,a~~ yo s.~Uy ~a~ v O <O O 7 ~ G v ^d'T 1 i n ^ o ,~~ s~ ~"n ~^ ~~w w'o Q ^ 3 ~ O ~. ^^~ P +~ 6 O u~i y ~! M ~~ ~w p s ~e e~ w a YY~ apwPi vG ~as ^ ^ Q^ g_6 Sa» a ~«S ~~ ~~. ~: h~ ~ ~"! ~~ ~.~~, Ir+ n ;o ~+ Q 5 ~i P. m` p °~o~' a '~ w % A f. °C^ 5m~ 8°3 e ~o Q~~ N ~ N Orp ~ ym ~~i o~o a~ N ^ imp '=N^g O '+YO COs 5°o m o$w ~~ ^ ~, ~ N ^p G] O ~ s M ; ^p0 ,o~ E ~' m ^ .°. --~ ~. ~~'~ ~ ~ ~a~~ ~°-~~~o O ~ b ~~ p r6 "a. c s~~c o~ ~~ C ~ ry G a ~ KrF~ nr~^ .~Q.~ u •-7rR.~ ~f ~m~~ ~3eg ~~ !E2 ou ~~ 3~^^x~` ,^..w C fw»~o°_~ a~»RE~a ""-m ~m wo"o ~. m 7 ~w ~ _OC~^'or q= w ~ p 0 ~' w ry s,dm^a~ dP.,.o,cO•R~ ~9~o°c3 cc'~~;6~e ~iw^6q YU~CnGO E_~ ^^ p1E ~~ ~~Y'W OO wwm^E a5°y,^, ..m °6`~~0~ ma^°o»^~ ^mY0r^ R»~~~y09'piC r up A b~ ~ ~C (iw~W pA A~1 ~y ~tOROZ~R ao6R= ~~~'<7. m :i A s ~ ^ A $ C 7 o N~.o °mR~' ~. wn p'^, o ~^C~ 00~ Ado» ., o a.~T ^ ..r T ^ Y'^O^ ar.cm ~,oa° Y Mq ^ ~ O r'a O ~v,~ C ~n~~ - tngfaugurnrouTM.tl.tmsc - r.a sox Bess, stvwur n;tu, a saa;a vot. I I w un.r~aor wwm,,srssr, MAR 23, 1987 sb. 6 MACI.EY SBPR I8G CAOUND A plm eo rm 6f peed train prrice br t ~ nY~ and thnro if. ~ Cori m tbrsa di arm[ U r laths frosts - in Wsbington D.C., Car- son Cit] and Sacramento. The proposed 25Q-~ph lYglar train idm mould coat about 83-5 Dillim... ...In Ysshingtm D.C., U.S. Sm. Chic Becht (R-NV) introduced legislatim that would sllor Berada to trmsfer sbovt f10 sdllion in unused Orbm 11sss Trsosit 4uthorlt] Sect. 9 funds to Ssnte CLn Comtr in CA. Harads would thm get i10 sd.llion fros the fade tMt could be used for the super speed trsie. (UM'A sxrae] eaa't be used for this pro~aet)... ...In Saerssento, Glif. Aseasbl]sen Rlehsrd 4ts(D-Sepulveda) has introduced AB 1839. Gas chairs the Aseesbi] Trmr portetim Committee. The prineipsl eo- euthor Se CA State Sen. Yeddie Deddeh(11- Chula Yiste), vbo theirs the Senate Trmn- __ portetlon Casstlttee. Yeterm lobb]isc Pnuln Trgt is eoordinstinR lesislstire sctlrities for the Citr of Les Yesns... ...In Carson Cit], NV State Sen. Yfllies G¢aio(R-Reno), their of the poxerfvl NY State 5emte Finance Cossittee, lest week von a rote to here his cossdttee draft e super speed [rein bill with a :120,000 epproprietim for etert-up some]. Io eddltioo, State See. ,)sees Gibson(D-Bender- eon) rill introduce a Dill that is identical to CA's AB 1839... ...The plan is to hove both the Calif. end Nevede Legialeturee pass identical bills that x111 eetebliah n 14-meatier Supar Speed Gromd Trensportntion Cossisslm(SSGTC). This cossission mould here the power to do the necesser] studies; purchase the lend; award the costract; set the route; end operste ee a public agent]... ...Yhile this is ell rev] positive, there ere eerteia public offleleL in California, aspecfall] in Sao &rnardiao County where casseu..usocuns,utc. the [rein ronl trace , oppose Chic im x.~.,w..or n,a plan. Mora In smtMr issue of Y651'PEl7... tw a.sa.., a sooor - CALPEEK ~~ ..a.o.+.a.sv.n.m„t...a a+«.... ~ 12 -~~ ~ OY M,w~1aa0M ~r41y0re, IMR 13, 19{7 w, 12 aloprau an noria{ at • paw U 9aeraass4 sad Carer Cttp r backers of a ~~i ~wa~~ batnar ~.! ~ start t6a on{ proesr of Dsildia{ a eaalitir Of report for this proposal... ~{l(p'~a1a 9114), taatef.o of tM eirt• ~i iYr~taeir Cawie4a, r prin- • Other m-aotbon iaclad• Barton .mball, Jfa 911is. 9errr [ear sad A Here'• a brief an•ar7 of reert der~lop- Ma4 abort thL pm~ect: • te{islatiw Ass bar foraallp fauo- dscad U Saco ~ laaaablpar 9lchard 4es (p-Sapul~ada) vbieb ronld aa4611sh a 14-arbn 9a~ads/GllforaL eo~irico 4 werar the riot aapeeu of this aslri-bdlliw dellsr pro/esa1. L Csrsr Cit7 last nark, the 11~ Suu Sara picots Cs~ittr noted to hares • Mll dnftad that noald sppropela4 1110,000 4 cmar =the la1t1a1 rpeora of tA1s ew,Su4 m~tsaiea. ~ saeaad bill K31 b. satro- daead M Np Sub San. Jaw I. Oibaw(9- Srdersr) that rill M Sdrtlwl to the aw 67 Lcs... • lka Cit7 of W Ye{u has stained ~aterr lobbTlat Paola Trrt to handle le{islatina aceltltip on behalf of the aaarra, ~! 1639... • Ia edditiw to 4ts, rho U eheitra o[ the Arrabl7 Traoapor4tiw Coaaittr, '14re hu elm lined np S44 Ssa. WddU ...dt this point than L m tietal lapact w the S44 of Calif.. r 9arada sad Iws P latarea4 ere plekln{ sp the cote of this tno-.4uu ec~irioe. SM cwt 1n rr117 nrll caapared to the orerdl price 4{ of the rhola pro~act -13-5 Hlliw... ...7'he ~~ rear apaad trala idr L mt Kehw! 14 critics. ILa Bas 9esneedlao ~saoclatios of Oonraar4(SiN{AC) Ss the cost noeal, erpressie{ coscen abort r iacrrse U traffic wa{estion and air pol- lotion if thin pro,~ect is aetwllr bnilc... dlehou{h m ford hearfa{ dates have bra amoanced for d9 1699, re awrce ladiates • first hearin{ sd{ht a bald arord der. 21. Another dau nentfoaad for • first bearin{ we Mq 6. 347 tnaad... ceaaeu, wssocurea, tNc lnl N. ta,q~op ana la A~OnM. CA 7000/ W~STPEEK r.o. sox IAM, nvaLr NILLa a mot/a /~io. 3I Mr NWwlm a o1FE R.R.wl.o. MIMRn FEB 9, 1987 ~Pi113 TO 80. CAi,IF. 9IIPlZi TRAIN 7D&. mr or a auear-ane train llniang the publing mecca s emu th efts of the fastest proving area of Southern C-al.if.y tM. San Beraardlno/Rlvereide Canty +n+~ ~ area, Sa beginning to move foavard in Loth Lbe Nevada ani Calltoraia Stab Lsgielaturee... Id'S1PBF7[ aourcea sqy Calif. Aeaemblvmn Richard Esta(D-Sepulveda), cheirem of the Aeeemb],v Treneportation CommiLLee, plane to introduce some legislation that will eetablieh aCalif.-Nevada comiaeion to invsetignte the femibility of such a pro- ~eet. Nevada State Sen. James I. Gibew Tt-Hsnderem) has already in uc i en- tical legielatian Sn Carson City... ...The cormiaslon mould select a firm to wriU an EIR; handle the permitting pro- eees (there are about 3o-40 permits that are needed); mould select the all-Smport- mt route from Ins Vegea to So. Calif.; e~ mould eventhelly choose a firm Lo I.N 7.1 .•vi nro~1n 1ha *Ril NAtAe itself... ..The commission members mould be evenl.,y split between the tw States. Originally the idea was for en eight member body, bit that Se probably Loo small. Amore real- Satic figure Se 14-16: Funding for the co®isaion would come from Nevada sources, mnlnly the City of Ins Yeges, the Nevada Resort Association end the State of Nevada itself. Probably the most expensive aspect would be the EIR study, which could coat =1 million. However, Lha.t'~s small change compared to the $3-5 billion pricetag on the whole project... ...SST super speed trein)beckers are very qulek to note that just because a eom- miaeion might be eatabliahed doesn't mean there will be en SST linking the States. The key Se getting the aecemaary xlanulg. A 51.25 aillion fSnanclal end ridarmhip study paid or the City of lea Ymps concludes that there Se both the terhno- logy a~ the riders to make this Sdea go... ...The hope Se that elthmr the Preach or Careen designers of various high mpsad rail syeteu might be willing W pq far the whole tiling, provided that they could operate the train efnd asks St profitable. That's n very BIG if. The French have a 1GY rail system that Levels at 180 myp, while Lhe Beet Geraean have i'd8-Iwv which flies at 250 mph. The Japanese abujlet train" technology ie not c~eidsred u advanced u either of the otMr tw... ..."section on the Calif. Bide of the border has been nixed or cool. Yffi•TPEFx editors were recently in the InLrEd Hmpire and the reception to Chia idea wen chilly. Newly elected San Bermrdino Co. Sup. Jon Mikele Se deed net against the idea, feel- ing that the super speed train will Joel create sore pollution and traffic congeet- iom... ...WESTPEIX also talked briefly with Cali: Assemblyman Bill LeoTxtd(R), vhoee distric is within the general arm of the proposed route along Interetnte 15- The lav~lEer says if there is n '+aY to get some bene- fit out of the train proposal far hie area then he'll support it. Leonatd noted that iY there was a route which mould take the super speed train near BS BearBe~r Ieke, re- sidents of hie district mould be Sn favor. The Big Bear area is a year-round tourist resort, especially in the winter with eki- ng. Ho.rever, the local highways are ~am- med with care and with so little money far new road construction, n train proposal might have some merit... {Continued on Nezt Pace} WESTERN STATES IOUTICAL WEEK IW E3TIEE%I I I53N ass 6E»1 IS AN INO VEMOENT, NOMARTI6AN NEWS ANALrMb aULLETIN OF INLIC roUCY,USL13NING, IMC. A CALIFORNIA IUSLIC eENFFIT NONIROiIT CORIORATION TELEINONE. (71]1 ]7aa3a3. AODREas LO. SO% IE6a BEVERLY NILL6, CA 90]19. TA%DfDVCTgIE CONTRIBUTION ff0/YEAR IUSU3NED eLMa1TNlY E%CER THE FIRST ANO LAST WEEK6 OF THE YEAR COIVRIGNT EY IVBLIC IpUCY IUeL13NING, INC iNlf TRADEMARx REGISTERED WITH iNE CALIF. ffD OF STATE. RNRDWLTION IN WHOLE 011 MRT REWIRES E%IRESS IERMISSION. ALl RIGNTf RESERVED. IET CLASS IeeTAGE IAIO AT LOS AMGE LES. .In aWr !or tots .p..a Ltala to dw aaaa Taal f.peL, bofL po oaa .nt! as'r y.opl. boltora tb. ivnt. coat ~o g~ Sm Daroudlao tod Into oifbr L.A. oa' Dn~o Cant,1. If tao gala ow]d ~o to tbor arw, thoo Tb po far afar taslot Aol]ara rw]d atLo g9T • ~al~tlo aanrt far both OaltlarnL and 1a~ada. Hawvar. fhorawtlpaora gwbloa hu~o. lraa~tario Aoobda ~rhna~aw~l~d la looatod) could coot aoothar aavoral ama bllliae debars. .. ...l1~aa L an other point that owotfare wwpoa aoLip. Tho1a bu baoa oaaataat talk about bnildlu~ anethar lataraatiaoal airport. Sa tha Laooutor/Yaladals ara of L.A. Cwnt,. 9u~' aPMd Bala ~d~oab~ _ aot~ tAaL La 9apo~ lntarutlaaal aSiyo=•t could b dust 70 ednutaa arty frog dbtario Iatornatlaoal Airport via thL him apaad train. ' Mona m S8T 1a a Ltar i.ew of tlB3fplQQ... Ceaa6LL AffOCU71a.INC. J]0 N. W~Y~or n.a Iq ArM. G faW~ 1 1 1 `~ 1 1 SUPER SPEED TRAIN REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DEC6M88q, 1886 CITT O~ lA! VlOA! !Y~!! !~!!D TlAIN D!VlLO~MlMT TAl~ IOlCI . SUPER SPEED TRAIN DEYELDPlIENT ~ Decesber, 1986 INTRODU CTION Since 1981 the City of Las Vegas has overseen the preparation of a series of studies to determine the feasibility of building a high speed ground transportation system between Las Vegas and Southern California. Rfter five years of analysis the studies are now complete and the conclusions are in--the project is feasible. This narrative summarizes the details of the studies and outlines a plan of action for implementation of the Super Speed Train system. HISTORY The need for the Super Speed Train system was first articulated by Las Vegas business and community leaders in the immediate wak f th il e o e o price increases of the 1970's. Hi gher costs of fuel for all forms of transportation--but particularly for automobiles and the commercial airlines--reduced discretionary travel upon which the Las Vegas econo- my is dependent. the concept of a Super Speed Train system was born as an alternative to th t l e pe ro eum dependent modes of transportation that currently exist. Southern California is the largest single source of visitors to Las Vegas, therefore the Las Vegas/Southern California corridor emeroeA ac tho t~~;"at t•~~~~< o,,, a ,,,.,, ~ ............. f _ a Super Speed Train system. - ~ ~ ~ -~~~-"~~~~~~- .. An initial study, referred to as Phase I, was undertaken to determine the feasibility df a Super Speed Train system. It was conducted by The - Budd Company assisted by Bechtel. The study, completed in 1983, concluded that the project was technologically feasible. The Phase 1 - study also concluded that additional work was necessary, particularly _ in the area of ridership forecasts. In 1983 the Federal Railroad Administration agreed to fund the more _ detailed study called for in Phase I. this Phase 11 study was divided into five specific areas: Ridership Verification, Technology Fsses- _ sment, Socio-Economic Impacts, Environmental Review, and Organization/ Financial Planning. This study was conducted by five independent -. con?roc to rs and was coordinated by a sixth consultant Rober? E. „ Parsons, Inc. RESULTS OF THE VHASE II STUDY Ridershi - Barton Aschman Associates, Inc. was retained to conduct a eta; a patronage study and forecast future ridership on the proposed Super Speed Train system. Data from surveys of travelers in the Las Vegas/Southern California corridor were used to develop a scientifical- ly sound, state-of-the-art computer model that produced future rider- ship estimates. In order to obtain reliable information from the model, realistic inputs had to be developed. The inputs were based on the characteris- tics of a magnetically levitated (Maglev) Super Speed Train system identified in the Phase I study. Maglev, in its simplest sense, is like a train without wheels. The vehicle is lifted or levitated on a fixed guideway by magnetic forces. Electromagnetic forces then ro el p p the vehicle at super speeds. With no moving parts, it rides on a cushion of air and is friction-free (except for aerodynamic friction). At top speeds of 250 m.p.h. the Maglev Super Speed Train could travel between Las Vegas and Ontario, California, the proposed terminal location in Southern California, in IS minutes. Around trip fare of 565.00, in 1984 dollars, was another key input to the forecasting model. A fare at this level was estimated to be sufficient to cover the operating and capital costs of Lhe Super Speed Train system while remaining competitive with other modes of transportation. Ba d th se on ese input variables, the model predicted that starting in 1995, the estimated first year of operation, up to four million riders would use the system. This number would grow to over five million annual riders Dy the year 2025. As important as the total ridership PSLimatP Lhc mnAal alto chnvnn •n.r ~~,,, .ea: .:..- - _ _ , JVf/C, Speed service would induce 28Y additional +passengers in 1the corridor. An induced passenger is one who would travel be Lween Las Vegas and - Southern California with the introduction of the Super Speed train who _ would not make the journey otherwise. Technology Assessment - The Canadian Institute of Guided Ground Tran- sport was reta;neU to pto provide an objective assessment of the develop- - moot status and cost of the super speed train technologies around Lhe world that have the highest probability of successful deployment in - the corridor. The Phase I study had concluded that a Maglev system was _ best suited for this corridor. The Institute reviewed all existing Maglev systems and also considered other alternatives. - In all, four Super Speed Train technologies were seriously evaluated and bwo tec hrcl vG ies werz determined to i,e rzady for implemen tat; o,^, it the Las Vegas/Southern California corridor by 1995. They are the German Transrapid Maglev and the French TGV-q tlantique train which is - a steel wheel on rail system (non-Maglev). 1 1 i Trans rapid 06 - German Maglev TGV -French Super Speed Train The remaining two candidate systems, wnrcii in iiie upiu l~~~ „' "' consultant would not be ready for deployment by the target date but which show promise, are the Japanese National Railroad repulsive Maglev system and the Japanese Airline High Speed Surface Transporta- tion system (also Maglev j. Tne capital costs for the Transrap id Maglev system were estimated to be b2.8 billion in 1984 dollars. The primary components of the system, are the guideway and the vehicles. Annual operating costs for the Tr an sr apid system were projected at S76 million. The consultant also produced estimates of E2.0 billion for capital costs and 866 million for operating costs on the French TGV-Attantique system. While esti- mated Lo cost less than Lhe Maglev system, the French train also travels at lower speeds (top speed of 180 m.p.h. vs. Maglev's 250 m p, h. 1, this reduction in speed results in a proportional decline in to tai estimated ridership. All of the cost estimates produced by the lns ti to to were reviewed and accepted by the manufacturers of Che technologies. 3 1 t r Socio-Econo~ic - A consultant team lead by Applied Economic Systems, nc. wa~c Led to perform the Socio-Economic Impact Study. This study, which was specifically requested by the Southern California representatives, looked at the benefits of the Super Speed Train system to both Las Vegas and Southern California. The focus of this study was the direct economic benefits Lo both regions that would result from the construction of the system (estimated to take seven years) and the increase in spending that would occur as a result of the induced riders. In addition, the study also considered the sec- ondary economic benefits due to the multiplier effect. The study found that during the construction period, the majority of economic benefits from the Super Speed Train system would be realized by Southern California. The construction related benefits come from two main sources: regional employment, Dayrol ls, and consumer spend- ing; and regional purchases of goods and services. Peak construction at tivity will occur in 1992, in that year 1,500 new jobs will be created in Southern California and over the entire construction period these employees will earn $220 million. In addition, more than $750 million of goods and services (e.g, construction materials) will be purchased in the region during the construction period. These direct economic benefits, which represent 80% of the total system related regional expenditures, will have afar greater impact on the economy due to the secondary or multiplier impacts. For example, in 1992 the direct Super Speed Train expenditures wilt result in $480 miilion more in multiplier sales and secondary employment impacts would be on the order of 6,400 crew jobs. After the system begins to operate in 1995, approximately 130 people would work directly on the Super Speed Train system. With operations will also come the additional spending by the induced riders. Sales in Southern California will increase by $125 miilion per year beoin- mn in ~iie iiisL em of ., - •"is _ ^^";^^ has °_ nnod- 9 r N=roti r~. .r-.....,, ing increase in employment of about 2,200 new jobs. Th er i~n duced ridership spending in California represents 20% of the to tat produced by the introduction of the new system. In addition to these henefi ts, this study also identified the poten- tial for the system to act as a commuter line De tw een Victo rvil le and Anaheim. Benefits to Las Vegas would be greatest after the system begins to operate in 1995. [n that first year of operation, direct sales from new visitors brought by the Super Speed Train would be $360 million. The total economic benefits from these new sales in the region will exceed $600 million and result in 13,000 new jobs. These figures will grow to 4725 million and 16,000 new jobs by the year 2025. Environsental - ORS Corporation conducted an initial environmental as- sessment to determine if some critical factors in the environment would preclude the construction of a Super Speed Train system between Las Yegas and Ontario. Although not a full scale Environmental Impact Statement, Chis study reviewed such environmental wnsi dr 'a Lions as air quality, aesthetics, biology, geology, land use planning, health and safety etc.. The contractor discovered no insurmountable environ- mental issues that would stop the Droj ec t. Those concerns that were discovered are the type that would normally be addressed in the engi- neering, design and Dl anning phase which would accompany any major project of this nature. The study also identified between 30 and 40 permitting agencies that would be involved in the granting of operational and other conditional approvals for the system. Organizational/Financial - Robert J. Harmon and Associates, Inc. was se ec to as the con su t~ant for the Organizational/Financial Planning study. The principal objectives of this study were to determine financial feasibility of the project and to recommend an organization- al approach to implementing the Super Speed Train system. The consultant concluded that the system is financially feasible and could be implemented by 1995. The foundation of this conclusion is the strong cash generating ability of the system after the initial start-up period. The cash flow projectf ons show that by the year 2016 the long term capital indebtedness would be fully retired and the annual positive cash flow would increase from the previous year's total of 5300 million to 5800 million. (See Figure 1, below) The SUPFR SPEED TRAIN CASH FLOM PROJECTIONS, FIGURE 1 1.2 1.1 i 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.5 0.4 c 0.0 a 0.2 ~ 0.1 w --- C -0.1 -0.2 1996 2000 2004 2000 2012 2016 2080 ~v M (Assumes 6X inflation) V1J Beforlr Lax cash flow 2024 5 stream of income from system revenues represents more than a 20% return on investment. The study concluded that the most suitable organizational approach to implementing the Las Vegas to Southern California Super Speed Train is a private sector franchise. This approach requires that the States of California and Nevada award an operating permit to a private company to operate the Super Speed Train system. A private company would 'nave the ability to attract both debt and equity to the project and would not have to rely on any direct financial assistance from local or state government. Financing the system would De a multi-step process. The first phase will be a construction loan which would 6e provided 6y the foreign government whose technology is selected. Then, after a sufficient period of operation, bonds would be issued as permanent financing. issuing the bonds after the system has established an operating history will bolster the confidence of the financial community and will result in a lower interest rate. Finally, after several addi- tional years of operation, the system will generate sufficient cash flows to permit the restructuring of the financing package. Conclusion of the Phase II Study - These studies document that the upe~r~eed Train projectis not only feasible Gut would have a drama- tic positive impact on travel between Las Vegas and Southern Califor- nia. The information in the studies show that Lhe market for the system exists, that the system can be privately owned and operated and that it will make a profit. The positive results of the studies leads to the conclusion that the project should be moved towards implementa- tion. SUPER SPEED TRAIN TASK FORCE r„ can .~~~.~, ~noc r..i. r.. _-_ ...~ .... , a ~~ .. ~..~.., COnNri~Cd G` ""i~ty-vuc Laa ~~.yaa business leaders rand public officials, was appointed by the Las Vegas City Council to review the results of the five consultant reports. led by Chairman Jack Libby, a local ho mebuilder and Vice-Chairman Bobby Baldwin, a hotel/resort executive, the Task Force concurred with the Phase lI conclusions. After reaching Lhe conclusion that the project is feasible, the Task Force recommended to the City Council that the Super Speed Crain De moved towards implementation. STEPS TO IMPLEMENTATION The fundamental requirement for implementing this new system is the ' establishment of an entity that has the authority to select a franchi- see. This entity must be recognized by both States and the federal government. The City of Las Vegas recommends that the State of Nevada ~p and the State of Cniifo rn i.~ execute an intereta*.e compact and form a i Bi-State Commission to act as the implementation entity. i M Phase [II 'Action Plan In order to form a Bi-State Commission approp- , riate a ig s a[1 ion must be passed. In addition to this task, support and understanding of the Super Speed Train project must be expanded throughout both states and within the international community that has interest in this project. Both of these critical tasks, which comprise Phase [I1 of the project, will require considerable time, effort and expertise. Up to this point the Super Speed Train project has been primarily the domain of the City of Las Vegas and the Federal Railroad Administra- tion. However as concluded in the stud thi , y, s project will benefit California and Nevada. In order to carry the project beyond its present position, it must now become a bi-state effort. the City of Las Vegas is proposing the establishment of an interim SST Project Office to carry out the Phase III tasks of drafting legislation , gathering support for that legislation, and working towards its pas- sage in California and Nevada. This office will be assisted by an Advisory Group made up of members representing various public and private interests in both California and Nevada. ' PHASE IV Precons truction Activities After the creation of the Bi- ~ate ~mmission the project wt enter Phase IV. Ouring this phase several pre-construction activities must be completed, including es- ta6lishing a process to select a franchisee, completing an Environ- mental Impact Statement, securing a joint use agreement for the Interstate 15 right-of-way, performing detailed design work and obtaining all necessary permits. Either during or after Phase IV of the project the franchise can be awarded, the private sector will take over and construction can begin. The target date for this transition is 1989. roan nc tnu The comprehensive studies completed to date verify that the Super Speed Train project would be a positive element in the future develop- ment of the Las Vegas/Southern California intercity travel corridor and possibly could play an essential role in the development of future commuter service in the Los Angeles hasin and the Las Vegas Valley. Perhaps the most important benefit of these feasibility studies for Lhe future of California transportation is to show that Super Speed systems are technologically feasible and economically viable. Success in the Las Vegas to Southern California corridcr could lead to a state wide network connecting Lhe major metropolitan centers. The Las Vegas/Southern California Super Speed Ground Transportation System can be Lhe firs[ step Lo achieving the goal stated by the Cat~ifornia State Legislature, at the time of passage of the California Passen aer Ra;t Finartring fn^Imi551nn AC t, 'when thEy found that ••lt 15 OeCe55dry and essential that the state use all means and measures Lo promote rapid rail transit systems within Lhe state in order to reduce air pollution and reduce congestion nn freeways streets, and highways." The completed studies and the knowledge they provide sl~uw that a Super Speed system is possible, but this is just a starting point. The State of California and the State of Nevada must join with the private sector if such a system is to become a reality. i t 1 i 1 i 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f A~ r of ~ e.QaFaa~ra r r r N r cmr a~ awcao a~o~u- ~~~,~.~ r REAPPORTIONMENT RifORT REAPPORTIONMElIT AND AEDI9TRI80TION OD AS9E99Mi1RS A99[SSNENT DISTRICT N0. 02-1R The City Connell o! the C1tp o! Rancho Cncaawapa, Callfornla, hu prwiowly eoallrae0 aaweewala Sn a epeelal aooaaat _ dletrict pnrewnt to tba tal~a sad provlalona o! tba "Nanielpal Iaprowaat Aet of 1919", belay Divleloa 12 of the street/ sad HiDh~wya coda of the ataH of Calllorala, sad bonds ~rere Seeaed to repraeat the eoeH for onpald aaaa•unts pnranaat to the taro sad prwlaiow o! the "Laprowaent fond ACt o! 1910•, MlaQ Divleioa 10 0! said Coee. wid apeeial aaaeeeaeat diatriot enoMn and daaipaated o AsaE89MENT DISTRICT NO. e2-1R Sabeequeot to the eoatleaation, oertata lots and/or pascel• of lead upon afiieh LMre era unpaid ap..w.nsa baw bNn apportioned or divided, and the oadereipnad, ae Aaeesauai R:ginaar, bas apportioned and aavrapata0 tM mpald aaonnt O! Bald !aelaliwate, all u antherlaad b] fart 10 of the "2aoroVNent aond Act o! 1916". aoaCit1oa11V COYea0lna Mith seclSan 9790 sbaseot, of the 9tre:te and Riahways coda of the stets o! Cal1lor1nla. The mderaipaM, ae Aeeeeeant 6npineer, does hereMitb eubalt the tollopiap report, eettinQ forth tka to13oN1np: Exhibit A: L1etlnp o! eeprepatlon sad raapporeionaent of uaeeauate c 90 I Of R CITY Of CRO DA STATE OD C NIA Approved by the CSty Council of eM City e! Rancho CueaaonOa thi• day of 1997. CITY CLNRR CITY 01 RANCNO CUCAMONOA lTATR O1 CALIDORNIA I DO HBREEY CERTIIY THAT THN CITY COUNCIL O1 THE CITY Ol RANCHO COCAMONOA, CALIIORNIA, DID, >OLLONINO A POBLIC NEARING, CONtIRM AND NODIfY THE ASSWSMKNTS A9 SET TORTE HEREIN ON THE DAY OP 1987. CITY CLERK CITY O/ RANCHO CUCAMONOA SEATS Of CALIIORNIA RECORDND IN TNH O/IICi Ol THL SOPNRINTNNDENS Or STRHETS Or THH CITY Ol RANCHO CDCAININOA, CALIIORNIA, THIS DAY 0/ Seer. svvNRINTHNOSNT or eTRSSra CIT1! O1 RANCHO COCANONOA eTATt O- CAL2/ORNIA A CERTIFIED COPY Ol THE AMENDBD ASSESSMENT DIAORAN NAS TILED IR TN6 O/1IC6 01 SN6 COUNTY RECORDER O1 THH COUNTY O1 SAN SERNARDINO, CALIIORN2A, THE DAY O/ 1887. CITY CLERK CITY O/ RANCHO CUCAMONOA STAIN Ol CALSIORRIA BXRIBIi "A" RBAPPOR?IONNBMr OP ASEi88NRRT ORIOIMAL ASSBSSMi11? Parcel Deaeription tlnpaid Aseeasaent (MBNaor'8 Daaerlptlon) Aeeeeewnt Aeouat RWWr Book/Paae/Parcel A8o911t Reaalninc 1028 229-261-T0 0239,214.98 0411,837.07 Pasch Map 9070 Parcl3 DeacrSptlon Onpald Ateeeaaent (YaNaor'e Daecrlpt3an) Aeeeeeemt ABWWIt iaeber Rook/Pace/Parcel Aaouet 1528-1 429-202-2T 81{9,710.61 0111,119.98 1328-2 229-262-20 0109.604.31 0103.117.69 TOTAL 0269,212..93 3211,037.67• Parcel Map 9670 •Indieatee the nnpa3A aeeeeeaent reaaininp aOainat the properly attar tha 1983/07 tax b111 hu heart paid (does not Snclude delinquencies i! any). '~ NI{!T t W 2 {WlT~ AMENDED DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 - 1R (REFUNDIPI6) em a {~~cNO cuc~ro~w~ earTr w s~ naunuwo {TAT[ OF CAVON{~ _ ~.arw~~.>v nr ti.m. ss ~. IY P ra NJ JFT~i ~ ~ p ~ ~- a w' w a j ~ auia ~ a~a- jua~~ P la 3T1:!J %~IaL a'% ~i ~ ~/ ~J ~uu.i.l tutu .iW 1, l ~ `I uw~e ruNY ~. ~'- - ~\ .......... u.nuw..ru~ ~'... w .~rw ~~ ~rii.~w r- a~n .tss.~ ~.oni ~`r:.`an~ "~nmur w mom w w.r w. ~ u .r-.ria~r cwt. r r. •'h'y N~.~~.ii. ~ nub. m M~u1.1V.u. M fnvn poet ~ - A~1~ w .iA1~ M vAwIM Y...w-. U V.1~ p.l/1 [IA .II- Mir .p ry~~t W W Y r.~..N..ia .l M.. Hli~ n n1 rt Rn . ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 82 - 1R d u.ro n ...r rr. rrm "n ~- ~t F / r.. I i . / ~~. ~iri.mr p ~ i ~t u_ -- _ _______. __ ~_'~__ ~ _ ~ 4'i `Y ~\ I ~ Ittl11 arc w. tMCLL I ~T .- ~~1/~yrr I~.SI SgISS ~r r rq ' I, _ I: .. ~ ~ ~~~Y. / .. m I -- - - - L-'- -~~- -- - ..,... -r - - - ~ .~ 1 . ~ I ; - •. T~ a«r. tea.: ~- ``c,°~._-.» ~_-- ~ ~ _ u^, r~`O7:'Ti.~ . . " ~ .s ~ u.~ r ni< '~C- I ~ ~ . . ~: o iu wr~ -- ~ ~ i w , r eno e ~'. . .MCEL 2 ~~ `~ r 3 ~ , I~.,, .<Mt % y ~ r ' `~I ~.~ -Tu: ~.~r~`.6A'r iuID 'rr:u-' r ~~~~ 7 ~ ~.a r ,n~ i +. re -r w+. ~ -~- ' ~ ~'~ t ~ r-... ~ ~ ~ I X _ .a. f'1:iJ.. SIIKS: _,~~ ~u11.6~ N ;+ -..... ~Rq~l Final Statement of Community Objectives 1 1 r City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant April 1987 DRAFT rxsAn aTATElOERT or COMMUNITY oa7soTxvsa for the 1987/88 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA APRIL, 1987 cotton/Beland/Associates, Inc. 1028 North Lake Avenue, Suite 107 Pasadena, California 91104 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section I. Introduction and Resolution II. Standard Form 424 III. Community Development and Nousing Plan A. Summary of Community Development and Housing Needs B. Description and Assessment of Use Of previous CDBG Entitlement Funds C. Comprehensive Strategy/Statement of Community Objectives D. Three-Year Project Summary IV. Relocation Assistance Policy V. Community Development Program A. Summary B. Project Descriptions and Mapa VI. Housing Assistance Plan and Housing Action Program VII. Citizen Participation Requirements VIII. Certifications Page 1 6 7 it 16 23 27 28 31 G~SCAMp^, ~~o ~9. Q r ~, ~ Z I. Introduction a Cj ~l 1975 I. IRTRODDCTIOR The City of Rancho Cucamonga has participated in the federally funded Community Development 81ock Grant program since its incorporation -first as a part of the Urban County program administered by San Bernardino County, and, since 1982, as an entitlement city. Since 1982, the City has received $2,146,000 in Community Development Block Grant funds, which have been used for a variety of projects (described in Section III) - all aimed at meeting the federal objective of: "development of Viable urban communities, by providing decent housing and a suitable living environment and expanding economic opportunities, principally for persons of low and moderate income." With this year's application, it is time for the City to update its three-year Community Development and Nousing Plan to set goals and outline program objectives and potential projects for the next three years. In the past three years, the City has pursued a strategy of: (i) Focussing efforts on the pockets of older development within the larger, rapidly growing City; (2) Encouraging the upgrading of existing housing stock thrqugh low-interest loans and grants to low and moderate income homeowners; and f3) Imorov inq inadequate and substandard public fa r.ilitiec in these Target Areas (streets, storm drains, and recreation facilities). Five target areas were identified in the City's previous Community Development and housing Plan: North Town - east North Town - west Old Alta Loma Southwest Cucamonga Etiwanda Section III of this report furtF.er describes these areas. The housing rehabilitation program has been operating in all of these neighborhoods and Citywide, but the focus of public improvement activity has been the North Town neighborhood. During the next three years, the City anticipates continuing the same strategy, but shifting the focus of its efforts to the Southwest Cucamonga neighborhood. In soliciting ideas for projects to receive CDBG £undinq during the 1987-88 program year, letters were sent to all community groups and agencies which had previously submitted suggestions, as well as to City department heads. The project suggestions which Were received are described in Section V. Notice of the public hearing on the Preliminary Statement of Community Objectives was also published in the Daily Report on March 6, 1987. On March 18, 1987, the City Council held a public hearing to discuss the community's objectives for the CDBG program and to set priorities among all the projects suggested by City staff, community organizations, and residents for funding in 1967-88. The basis for that discussion was the Preliminary Statement of - Community Objectives. The City Council listened to public testimony and after considerable discussion directed staff to: _ continue funding for the residential rehabilitation grant and loan program; ° continue funding for the senior shared housing program; ' shift the focus of CDBG-funded public improvements from the North Town neighborhood (where eligible improvements have been completed or are in process) to Southwest Cucamonga; ° give a higher priority to street and sewer improvements in the area than to provision of a park; and ° develop a more detailed description of the improvements needed on each street and the estimated cost of those improvements to be used to determine the logical phasing of the work in the target area. ' The Public Works Department submitted a report on the improvements needed in the Southwest Cucamonga neighborhood, along With estimated costs by street for the Council's ' consideration on April 1, 1967. They were: 1. Arrow Route (from Grove to Sierra Madre) $ 296,000 ' 2. Ninth Street (from Grove to Baker) 350,000 3. Via Carillo (entire) 208,000 4. Placida Court (entire) 56,000 ` Avsnida :'ajar (Grove to Sierra Madro) 153,nnn ' 6. Calaveras Avenue (Ninth to Arrow Route) 270,000 7. Calaveras Avenue (south of Ninth Street) 149,000 A. Sierra Madre Avenue (north of Arrow Route) 132,000 9. Sierra Madre Avenue (Arrow Route to Ninth) 249,000 2 10. Sierra Madre Avenue (south of Ninth Street) 149,000 - 11. Vinmar Avenue (north of Salina) 71,000 12. Vinmar Avenue (SOUtA of Ninth) 135,000 -- 13. Salina Avenue (Calaveras to Sierra Madre) 138,000 _ 14. Alley South of Ninth (entire) 51,000 ..- TOTAL $1,761,000 '~ These streets have been targeted Por CDBG-Pundad improvement, beginning with Phase I in 1987-88. 1 1 1 3 RESOLUTIUIJ N0. '-~ ~ ~ ~~ -- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALiFORIJI A, APPROVING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ANU HOUSING PLAN ANU AOOPTI NG THE PRELIIdI NARY STATEMENT OF CDMMUNITY OBJECTIVES AND SELECTING PROJECTS FOR PRELIMINARY FUNDItJG FOR THE COh9AUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6LDCK GRANT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 1987-88. ~~' WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is an Entitlement City under the reyulattons governiny the Community Development Block Grant Program; and - WHEREAS, notice of the availability of funds for eligible projects was published in the Daily Report and mailed to interested community groups; - and WHEREAS, the City Staff has received proposals for projects and programs from various oryanizations in the Community; and WHEREAS, the City Staff has conducted a needs assessment to determine proyram eligibility and needs; and -- WHEREAS, the City Council has held a legally noticed public hearing in order to give the public an opportunity to respond to staff recommendations far program funding and to put forth for Council consideration recarmendations for their own; and WHEREAS, the City Council has heard public testimony and received all public input regarding the City's Camnunlty Development Block Grant Program for the nett program year. NOW, THEREFORE OE IT NESOLVEU, that the City Council of the City of Raitcito Cucamonga does hereby take the following actions: 1. Determine that operation of the Housing Rehabilitation program in the flood plain is the most practical and desirable of the alternatives, and the proposed mitigation measures are sufficient. 2. [f relocation of households or business is necessary as the result of a Community Development Block Grant program, the adopted relocation policy will be followed. 3. Approve the Comnuni ty Development and Housi ny Plan which proposes to focus public improvements in Southwest Cucamonga for the nex± three yea rs. 4. Select for preliminary fundiny the following projec is and programs to he funded out of the City's Community Development 61 ock Grant award: G11Y I;UUIJt;1L ItLSULI 1N tlU. LOM1VAUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6LOi.K GRANT March 18, 1987 Page 2 a. Housing Rehabilitation b. Senior Shared Housiny c. SW Cucamonya Street Improvements d. Program Administration (including lair Housing) TOTAL S10ti,000 6, 30U ,! 215,000 81,700 5409,000 1 1 1 1 cv~"^'oN .~ ~~ c9 Q r a ~, ~ ~ Z II. SF 424 ~~_ a 1977 I FEDERAL ASSISTANCE i .RU. . NUwfR a 54R • r,'N^.'_n GNra ~ a..f ; RrRSa N/p {e•rT. N/A I TYNE {.'STAN rEMI. r j % o< ^ NDTaO•ETFaaE WRTTEDfrSS R'R^'' • an ... A0 to •! • art su[•rnslDN frw, • O Mf.S/•t1GST10•T I •« ~rr• M 'A{yD.~ RStaONED Ir rR W ~+"• L2 •rRLUTrDn +[ 67 7 1 I n rt.n Tt yl ' fw+ lY.. ~WIRrRSGSa/i/RFDI~fNI f [W.DVE1110fMIEfjagNNWBFP IEINI ! •E•RIRR'•w•'• City of Rancho Cucamonga I D OTY7••a. ERR Planning Division [ ' D snrrrD u• p,0. Box 607 a nY • T~IRE.[R I I l4 i' Iz h tR • Ewa Rancho Cucamonga • rsYV San Bernardino 1 SaR• California at+DOe•.g1730 E~Reasef TMTRRi^ R c.'r"f.~'Ef4r Otto Kroutil (714) 969-1851 D Trrl[ ConFnunity Developm~ [ff*'"R'iP11 lock Gran[ 1. TRtE d RIR1r.5r(T'[ ITTp1ER [1M rrarl n r •~ ••r• r ~DNar • •rfnrr •r.Yrtrn r TD• rr OP RPRLf.RrEi~ qi ~`f`~.Fair Housing Services ~ '-a^^~+~ ~ OG 2. Housing Rehabilitation ~„s° ~ ,'-' ,,, y~ 3. Senior Shared Housing ~~ ~~~~ I~~ 4.Southwest Cucamonga Streets Phase I ~ •MGV•RW[R aa/AR IMArr~nw lRry RNR frI ID [STwATEDMUM•ER rI TYR OF ILSSISTANCj I 1 E/RERiflf•S IENfF1iTNG ~~ •~ 1 City of Rancho Cucamonga 74,000 `"'« r~-•-~ e" 6 pi Tt MM gtDaV•D,rD Tt rADRESSIDN•s pSrnKTE DE r•TYRf V••RSIf%rnOr• Cw~ f~~~ s t W a /uRK.WT \ RISORR r'~~ ~"'~ wr~r 35 35 D. IUM m n+.~Edn..wtraa.~l., s ra • . N• STA 00 Tf MQJFGY START 1• MD.IfR R t ..,T, .. ... .. •~~r• ~ OAT[ r« .•w r. A DU pN - a o• a L ,~ a. ~ T•87 ? 1 12 .a.Ir „ I . nvvR - _ . , I• DAR DEI[TO . r« ~rY •• _ w.M-r•r I E Tw ~ t .wJ 1 RDER'4 "DENLV' 11 87 5 31 T• RDEMS AG[NCT TO RERNE REOU[ST Department of I!ous inn and L'rban Devel opmenC » ERRTwK RDERAS GwaNf .Y.+,e,e.Tav.ww_ [EP 1 . ORWNWiIOUE umT IK RrRRO•nuTEl O ADURRSiRAnvF CONt IY RfgTTNI I e rea Office Re ion 1 8-87-NC^Ob-0555 • FL Iit R[YAPRS ADq[D 2500 'Ylsh ire Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90057 x ,~ 'g T•M an Or mT •nn•uOprw Dr,ar, R TF NS m N.r l A.'6NrAr~ ArOr. NAS rA]E Ar4JiSE fD TnFS ATF [ Y a„f yY n Ir, R'ram•(AT41/bOe aT [RECVTNE ORD[P 1»>i MCCESS ipE {fVIM Pi aM.IG,M Y. M W m,Ri M Dou,/rl P,a OfTE j CFRTMIft Or+. M •+^v^•^ N ^` [C"''^E at i 1NAir dA r M itlaarM •M aY MOb, N T R R Q , 1 .Rmp. ^^ wfn,rR+D rrr•+Dfr D Tq rROG AN E o +»ry NOT CO fO S F i] ' 1, rH WWYnfppwq OR MOGRAU NAS NOT •EEN SEt[R[O [•STATf fDR RE R[W ~!» • TTRD NArl AND TRLE 0 SIGWTVRE G,~ GTi,nfnrNG ` y~RFr,f vwwis Sion L. i~iuyur i :SEN•A^:f I `-~ N .~IG. Ywr «.ra r, i3 fEDERnE ArPEIt.SrgN [I(Ni,f4TgN NVY[[R K fEDf RAI gRAM Ip~(M1rDAT,(yi PECtrvED rt it rRgN rAREN 7< FVNpN4 Ir. rorra M b Ywr Mrr• R•rr SLARTNID ^ • .waPDEp » AR'0•v DARK N DAiE q _C D RUE^'E. I a fE0[MS _. RFTUPNED RDR [ OD T DDN1nD} fpl aDOnIDNAS ,NEDgw~ TIDN rn An+• ..Yri ..w R 9t rw. rn ar. EMD~Nu Y + Af•FnOUEM D AR•VDA•Ei p0 g , r WTt It ', ' } ^ 0 RETURNED fDR E O I»ra Wtu,55pN ' e STATE AD 77 RENA,55 ADD[D t RY Alr iUM t0 OCA I l L ~ I DD STATE • DE•EPPED • O1NfP _ __ OD _. w,rrrD,AwN I TDTAI t m ^ . ^ ND ,, . - ...~.,...,.~,., a a..r•a soeoA, D fcRU U. MCn mw .~.r III. Community ~ ° Development and Housing Plan 1977 III. COIDlDNITY DSY6LOP!lENT AND HODSIN6 PLAN i The purpose of the Community Development and Housing Plan is to "summarize the community development and housing needs of the _ city, its comprehensive strategy for meeting those needs, including its long and short-term objectives, and the projects and activities planned for the next three years." This plan contains the following sections to address those regulations: _ Summary of Community Development and Housing Needs; ° Description and Assessment of Use of Previous CDBG -- Entitlement Funds; ° Comprehensive Strategy/Statement of Community - Objectives; and _ Three-Year Project Summary. The City of Rancho Cucamonga last prepared a Community Development and Housing Plan in 1984. At that time, the major community development or low and moderate income housing need of the City was identified as the need to upgrade and maintain the pockets of older development in the rapidly growing City. As well as older housing stock, these areas have older public improvements which ara frequently inadequate for an urban area, or in need of repair. Five target areas were identified (Figure 1): 1. North Town - east 2. North Town - west 3. Southwest Cucamonga 4. old Alta Loma 5. Etiwanda These are small areas - much less than a Census Tract. because _ of the mix of older and newer development in each Census Tract, only two of these five areas (North Town east and west) were -- reported in the 1980 Census as having over 51 percent of the households earning less than 80 percent of the regional median household income, and therefore qualifying as low and moderate _. income neighborhoods. As a result, although all of the areas were targeted for housing rehabilitation loan and grant assistance, only North Town qualified for and received assistance in the form of upgraded public improvements (streets, sidewalks, parks, street lights, and storm drains). In 1985, the City commissioned a purvey of households in 013 niLa Loma and southwest Cucamonga to determine whether any 2 - Norf~ TovrEut 3 - ew~Awut Cuc.mwq. 4 - OIA Alh Lm $ - FootMtl/EtM~ _ City of Rancho Cucamonga Rehal~litr'ion Target Areas Figure 1 North ~ ~fX portion of these areas could be shown to be over 51 percent low - and moderate income households. Only a portion of one street in Old Alta Loma clearly qualified, but several streets in - Southwest Cucamonga did (Figure 2). City policy regarding the use oP CDBG program funds is to designate at least 51 percent of the entitlement funds each year for programs which directly benefit low and moderate income - households in the City. Since the public improvements identified as needed in North Tcwn have been largely completed (or are underway), the focus of the next three years' public improvements will shift to the - Southwest Cucamonga target neighborhood. 1 1 i 4 ~~ Terpet Aree m nun EIIp1U le 9irea tr m 0 n m h _y a ~ I _- .~ m <<, M 0 __ u r u rut unn u~ Arrow lii9nway ' r 1 L ~ i LM 1 -• I II ~! = r uu w .._ ,Inu pOOnnuuiul uuununmuurprpruunuuun In Slreel S ~~ w.~,~r~ ~rl irb# ~ ~ _ ;.. c- ~ + iy. 1 1 ~ .-~i ...FK Ar~H ~ :,~... _ -_7 J Bln Street Figure 2 =_ No Sca12 Eligible Streets Southwest Cucamonga ~C~ Summary of Community Development and Housing Needs A profile of the City describing population characteristics (based on updated 1980 Census data and State Department of Finance data) is shown in Table 1. The selected target areas for housing and infrastructure rehabilitation are all smaller than the area of a census tract. Table 2 shows a description of population characteristics at the block group level for the selected target areas. Data at the block group level were also obtained from the 1980 Census. - Target areas are shown superimposed over the block group areas in Figure 3. In previous program years, the North Town target area has been the focus for allocation of Block Grant funds for - community service and public improvement programs. Programs such as park land acquisition and street widenings have been - undertaken in North Town, which has been certified by H.U.D. as _ eligible for such improvements. The Southwest Cucamonga target area has also been certified by H.U.D. as eligible for public _ improvements. This area will be the focus for community service and public improvement projects over the next three program - years. - Information on the condition of the housing stock is provided in ' the Housing Assistance Plan (Section V of this report). 1. Housing . Ther_ is a need to continue City efforts to improve existing ~ Housing scoex cnac aoes Hoc meet nuilaing or sarecy cone requirements yet is basically sound and can, with some ' improvement efforts, continue to serve the housing needs of the City. Substandard units are not concentrated in on= area but are scattered in small neighborhoods throughout the City. There is also a need to continue City efforts to eliminate ' discrimination in the salt and rental of housing and to ensure that the rights of all parties are protected. ' The three-year Housing Assistance Plan and the one-year Housing Action Program (both attached) identify in tabular and narrative form the housing needs of the City. There are a total of 680 substandard units within the City (out of a total housing inventory of 22,664 units), of which 544 are suitable for rehabilitation. The total of minority households in substandard ..ng 136; minority households requiring rcnt~l ^,.bsidies total 295. A substantial number of households headedJby handicapped persons or single individuals with dependent children are also in the City. The City~s Housing Element of the General Plan notE~ that the city~s housing stock is generally sound (due to the relatively e TABLE 1 POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Number Percent I. TOTAL POPULATIONI 73,842 100.0 1) Sex -Male 36,995 50.1 -Female 36,847 49.9 2) Race/Ethnicity -White 64,907 87.9 -Hispanic 12,036 16.3 -Black 1,624 2.2 -Other 2,732 3.7 3) Employment -Employed 70,297 95.2 -Unemployed 3,544 4.8 II. TOTAL FAMILZES 19,562 100.0 1) Lower Income2 3,228 16.5 -White x,523 12.9 -Hispanic 626 3.2 -Black 19 0.1 _hfhe.- 7A A A 2) Income Below Poverty Level 900 4.6 III. TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 73,5641 100.0 i) Total Lower Income2 14,418 19.6 Households 1S OUrce: State Department of Finance Population Research Unit as of 1/1/86. Other data in this tzble were updated using the same proportion as the 1980 Census. '-lower Incone is defined as those families/households earr.inq less than 808 of the County median income. t2 TABLE 2 TOTAL L9W/MODERATE INCOME HOUSEHOLDS BY CENSUS TRACT AND BLOCK GROUP Census Block* Total Total** Percent Tract Group Households Low/Mod Income Low-Mod Income 8.02 1 495 83 16.8 8.02 2 686 151 22.0 13.00 1 340 58 17.1 20.00 1 673 71 10.5 20.00 2 3,396 516 15.3 20.00 3 2,430 523 21.5 20.00 4 3,643 333 9.1 20.00 6 39 3 7.7 20.00 9 1,691 200 11.6 21.00 1 764 233 30.5 21.00 2 1,150 299 26.0 21.00 3 1,279 639 5U.0 21.00 4 248 128 51.6 22.00 3 144 61 42.4 *LOW-moderate income households are defined as those with an income less than 80$ of the 1980 median income for San Bernardino County. **Household income information was suo__mressed for block arrnin_a not listed here. y 13 ~ Norl~ Torn-W~~t rj North Tovn-Est ,'~ SOYtDWUt Cuertmona• 4 OIA Alts Lom• $ Foot~lll/Etlr~n0~ ~~-OO Cranoutt Tncb ~~~Q Elock Orouo• City of Rancho Cucamonga Census Trac's, Block Groups and Rehabilitation Target Areas Figure 3 North ~ ~~ recent build-out of much of the City); however, the ..."deteriorating units in the older parts of the City will require...immediate attention." The Housing Element further identifies the expansion of lower priced housing units as a critical housing issue in the City (to accommodate the recent and projected growth) in addition to the problem of substandard units. Neighborhood Revitalization There is a need for certain public improvements in older neighborhoods which have been targeted for rehabilitation assistance to prevent the spread of blight and deterioration, to eliminate the causes of blight, and to support the investment of public and private funds in rehabilitation. Specific areas of improvement include: North Town street improvements, including reconstruction of the roadway and construction of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, an8 driveway aprons on the substandard streets; and Southwest Cucamonga street improvements, including reconstruction of the street and construction of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lights, driveway aprons on the substandard streets, and installation of sanitary sewers where none exist. l5 - B. Description aad ]laseasaent of the Dse of Previova CDHG - Entitlement 8unds - Rancho Cucamonga has been an entitlement City (receiving funds directly from the federal Department of Housing and Community Development) since 1982. In that time, the City has received a total of $2,146,000. -- Fiscal Year 1982-83 $ 360,000 1983-84 437,000 1984-85 467,000 1985-86 473,000 1986-87 409,000 Total $2,146,000 This section describes the use of those funds and assesses the - program's accomplishments in terms of both the national objectives for the Community Development Block Grant and the objectives which the City Council has set for Rancho - Cucamonga's program. 1. Fiscal Year 1982-83 In 1982-83, the City received $360,000 which was allocated to ' the following programs: ° Housing Rehabilitation Program: $ 84,000.00 ° Neighborhood Center Expansion: 81,000.00 " North Town Street improvements: 120,000.00 ~ (Center and Maxine Streets) ° contingency 17,787.00 ' Local Costs of Program Implementation 57,613.00 These projects have been completed and the funds expended or reprogrammed. The City's community development objectives for 1982-83 included the following: I. To develop a program capably of eliminating and preventing slums, blight, and conditions ' detrimental to health, safety, and public welfare that can aid in preserving housing stock for people of low and moderate income. II. Continue City efforts to eliminate conditions which are detrimental to health, safety, and public welfare, alleviate physical and economic distress ' through the stimulation of private investment and community revitalization and improve the quality of community services. 16 III. To expand and improve the quantity and quality of community services, provide needed neighborhood and community facilities and reduce the isolation of senior citizens living within the City. The programs funded by the City for 1982-83 are consistent with the City's objectives. The housing rehabilitation program directly meets the need addressed in Objective i; the North Town street improvements satisfy Objective II; the neighborhood center expansion carries out Objective III. - The programs are also consistent with the broad national objectives specified in the "maximum feasible priority" certification. The housing rehabilitation program is intended _ to improve substandard housing, thus eliminating slums and blighting influence. Participation in the program is also limited to lower income households, or families with senior citizen or handicapped persons as heads of household. The - neighborhood center expansion is targeted to senior citizens in the City. The street improvements will directly benefit residents of the North Town target area, a majority of whose residents are lower income. 2. Fiscal Year 1983-84 - In 1983-84 the City received a total of $437,000.00 in Community Development Hlock Grant funds which were allocated as follows: ° Housing Rehabilitation Program $ 70,000.00 ° NcinhhnrhnnA r<~ror Fvnaneinn ~4~ 0nn nn ° Fair Housing Services 5,000.00 ° contingency 5,OOO.o0 ° Local Costs of Program Implementation 60,000.00 These projects have been completed and the funds expended or reprogrammed. The City's community development objectives for 1983-84 were similar to Objectives I and III from 1982-83 and were as follows: I. To develop a program capable of eliminating and preventing slums, blight, and conditions - detrimental to health, safety, and public welfare _ that can aid in preserving housing stock for people of lcw and moderate income. II. To expand and improve the quantity and quality of community services, provide needed neighborhood and community facilities and reduce the isolation of ' senior citizens living within the City ' 17 The Housing Rehabilitation and Neighborhood Center Expansion - programs were consistent with Objectives I and II, respectively. The Fair Housing Services program serves to eliminate and prevent conditions detrimental to health, safety and public _ welfare as identified in Objective I. _ In terms of consistency with the national "maximum feasible priority" objective, refer to the discussion above regarding the 1982-83 program. In addition, the Fair Housing Services program provides mediation services in landlord/tenant disputes. The resolution of such conflict benefits low and moderate income _ families. The project also provides information and affirmative support for state and federal Fair Nousing Laws, consistent with - Section 570.601 (b) of the regulations. . ' 3. Fiscal Yeaz 1984-85 In 1984-85, Rancho Cucamonga received $467,000.00 in Community ' Development Block Grant funds which wore allocated as follows: Housing Rehabilitation Program $ 60,000,00 ° Fait Housing Services 6,000.00 ° North Town Park Site Acquisition 150,000.00 ' North Town Street Improvements Phase 150,000.00 ° North Town Street Improvement Planning, Phase 15,000.00 ' Contingency 15,000.00 ° Local Costs of Program Implementation 71,050.00 North Town Street Improvements were completed in the fall of 7986. Funds for the development of North Town Park were recently reprogrammed to pay for storm drains which it is necessary to install before the park can be developed. There ' are still some funds remaining from the administration account for this year which could be reprogrammed to another project. ' The adopted community development objectives for 1984-85 were: I. To eliminate and prevent slums and blight and ' conditions detrimental to health, safety, and public welfare while preserving the housing stock for people of low and moderate income. ' II. To provide information and affirmative support for the Fair Housing laws of the State and federal governments, in support of the goal of ensuring that all residents have access to a uecent hems in a suitable living environment. III. To provide neighborhood parks and recreation facilities in low and moderate income neighborhoods in order to support rehabilitation of _hose areas ' to and in order to n.:-t the needs of the residents. Creation of these centers for community activities will improve the living environment in the surrounding low and moderate income neighborhoods and support the prevention and elimination of blighting conditions, as required under the national priorities. IV. To eliminate hazards to the public health and safety and provide street improvements in areas targeted for housing rehabilitation assistance. Priority in these improvements is being given to areas whose residents are predominantly low and moderate income and to repairs which will correct health and safety hazards, thus improving the living environment. The Housing Rehabilitation Program is consistent with the first objective, Fair Housing Services implements the second objective, North Town Park implements the third objective, and both North Town Street improvement projects address the fourth objective. All of the projects are consistent with the national objective of giving "maximum feasible priority" to projects that benefit low and moderate income households and/or eliminate slums and blighting conditions. Rehabilitation loans and grants are available only to lower income households. The North Town area in which all of the capital improvement projects are In wtcA ha ci¢ ..s th.. _ t_ "" - 1. V111C category. cWell~over 518 of the~City's 1984~BSVCOmmunity Development Block Grant expenditures directly benef fitted lower income households. Fiscal Year 1965-86 In 1985-86 Rancho Cucamonga received $473,000 in Community Development Block Grant funds which were allocated as follows: Housing Rehabilitation Loan/Grant Program $ 80,000.00 North Town Park - Development 150,000.00 North Town Streets - Belmont/Acacia Construction 153,000.00 Handicap Signs 5,000.00 Future Frolects 10,Onn,np Contracts/Administration 26,000.00 Program Management 42,000.00 Fair Housing Services 7,000.00 Senior Shared Housing (reprogrammed funds) 5,000.00 i9 The street improvements were completed in the fall of 1986 and ' the funds allocated to North Town Park were recently reprogrammed to pay for storm drains which are necessary before the park can be developed. The Handicapp Sign=_ project has ' been determined infeasible, so these funds along with some remaining monies allocated to administration are available far reprogramming. ' The adopted community objectives for 1985-86 were: I. To eliminate and prevent slums and blight and t conditions detrimental to health, safety, and public welfare while preserving the housing stock for people of low and moderate income. ' II. To provide information and affirmative support for the Fair Housing laws of the State and Federal governments, in support of the goal of ensuring ' that all residents have access to a decent home in a suitable living environment. ' III. To provide neighborhood parks and recreation facilities iri low and moderate income neighborhoods in order to support rehabilitation of those areas and in order to meet the nerd= c_° t residents. Creati nn nF t:ooe centers for community activities will improve the living environment in the surrounding low and moderate income neighborhoods and support the prevention and elimination of hlinhtinrt mnAihinna a ronni roA nnAor hhc ~ nationalJpri.orities. ' IV. To eliminate hazards to the public health and safety and provide street improvements in areas targeted for housing rehabilitation assistance. ' Priority in these improvements is being yiven to areas whose residents are predominantly low and moderate income and to repairs which will correct ' health and safety hazards, thus improving the living environment. The Housing Rehabilitation Loan/Grant Program is consistent with Objectives I and II. The Fair Housing Services program serves tc eliminate and prevent conditions detrimental to public health safety and •:.~elfarc as idcntif icd in Cbject ive A program such as Fair Rousing Services also provides mediation assistance in landlord/tenant disputes. This assistance benefits low and moderate income households. The program also ' provides information and affirmative support for State and Federal F'a it Housing Laws, consistent with Section 5"9.601(b; of the regulations. Finally, the Fair Housing services program is consistent with the national "maximum feasible priority" ' objective. ~q The North Town Park project addresses Objective III and the North Town Streets and Handicapped Signs programs address objective IV. _ 5. Fiscal Year 1986-87 _ In 1986-87 (the current program year), Rancho Cucamonga received a total of $409,000 in Community Development Block Grant funds which were allocated as follows: ° Completion of North Town Street Improvements $ 13,000.00 (Acacia/Belmont) ° Housing Rehabilitation 80,000.00 ° North Town Street Improvements 198,000.00 (Turner Avenue - east side) ' Narth Town Street Improvements 50,000.00 (Feron Boulevard) ° Senior Shared Housing 6,000.00 ° Fair Housing Services 7,500.00 ° Administration 54,500.00 The rehabilitation program has spent $29,549 and made eighteen grants and three loans this year to date. The Turner Avenue Street Improvement project is in the design phase, with construction _ expected this summer. However, the improvements to Feron Boulevard have been delayed until the drainage improvements needed to permit development of North Town Park have been completed. This 16 not expected until 1988. In all, $60,396 of the 1986-87 grant funds had been spent as of March 1, 1987. - The adopted community objectives for 1986-87 are: I. To eliminate and Prevent slums and blight and _ conditions detrimental to health, safety, and public welfare while preserving the housing stock - for people of low and moderate income. - II. To provide information and affirmative support for - the Fair Housing laws of the State and Federal governments, in support of the goal of ensuring that all residents have access to a decent home in a suitable living environment. _ III. To provide neighborhood parks and recreation faci.l ities in low and moderate income neighborhoodG - in order to support rehabilitation of those areas and in order to meet the needs of the residents. - Creation of these centers for community activities _ will improve the living environment in the surrounding low and moderate income nelZhborhoods _ and support the prevention and elimination of blighting conditions, as required under the ' national priorities. 21 IV. To eliminate hazards to the public health and safety and provide street improvements in areas targeted for housing rehabilitation assistance. Priority in these improvements is being given to areas whose residents are predominantly low and moderate income and to repairs which will correct health and safety hazards, thus improving the living environment. The Housing Rehabilitation Loan/Grant Program and the Senior Shared Housing Program are consistent with objectives I and II. The Fair Housing Services program serves to eliminate and prevent conditions detrimental to public health, safety and welfare as identified in Objective I. A program such as Fair Housing Services also provides mediation assistance in landlord/tenant disputes. This assistance benefits low and moderate income households. The program also provides information and affirmative support Por State and Pederal Fair Housing Laws, consistent with Section 570.601(b) of the regulations. Finally, the Fair Housing Services program is consistent with the national "maximum feasible priority" objective. The two street improvement projects located in North Town (Turner Avenue - east aide, and Feron Boulevard) are consistent with Objective III, and they support the completion of North Town park by providing safe pedestrian access (sidewalks) to the park. 22 C. COHPRHHBHSIVE BTR1\T86Y (STATHNBHT OF COMMONITY OHJHCTIVHS) based on past direction from City Council and the analysis of community needs involved in the preparation of the Community Development Plan, the following Comprehensive Strategy (including Statement of Community Objectives) was prepared. Programs proposed to achieve these objectives are listed under each objective. A detailed description of each project is contained in the attached project description sheets (see Section IV ^Community Development Program"). City policy regarding the CDBG program is to designate at least 51 percent of the entitlement funds each year for programs which directly benefit persons of low and moderate income. 1. sousing Maintenance and Rehabilitation (existing program) Needs Assessment Finding: There is a need to continue City efforts to improve existing housing stock that does not meet building or safety code requirements yet is basically sound and can, With some improvement efforts, continue to serve the housing needs of the City. Substandard units are not concentrated in one area but are scattered in small neighborhoods throughout the City. Objective: To eliminate and prevent slums and blight and conditions detrimental to health, safety and public welfare while preserving the housing stock for people of low and moderate income. This is in direct compliance with the national objective of eliminating slums and blight. Only low and .. .... .,~ .yam .... ... y. which is also in accord with the Federal regulations. (Section 570.202 of the regulations.) Programs: The existing Housing Rehabilitation Pzogram offers deferred loans and below-market interest rate home loans to persons/families of low-or-moderate income and home improvement grants for minor projects to senior citizens and disabled or handicapped persons throughout the City. This program is managed by the San Bernardino County Office of Community Development through a contract with the City. Funded activities include: Outreach/public information; Home improvement loans; and rimme ropair grants (FCni~r l:l Y.l ]. P.n, f3l FilhlP.d, handicapped persons). housing maintenance and rehabilitation activities reflect the goals of the Housing Assistance Plan (H.A.P.). The rehabilitation goals in the H.A.P. are met through t'is program. 23 In 1982/83, $84,000.00 of the City's Block Grant was allocated for this program and $20,000.00 was expended. Zn 1983/84 $70,000.00 was allocated and $42,000.00 was expended at the end of the year. All of the funds from the 1983/84 program year have been expended. In 1984/85, $60,000.00 was allocated, and $44,800 was expended. In 1985/86, $80,000 was allocated and $126,000 was spent. To date, approximately $29,549 has been spent of the $80,000 grant for 1986-87. 2. Fair sousing (exietiaq program) Needs Assessment Finding: There is a need to continue City efforts to eliminate discrimination in the sale and rental of housing and to ensure that the rights of all parties are protected. Objective: To provide information and affirmative support for the Fair Housing laws of the state and federal governments in support of the goal of ensuring that all residents have access to a decent home in a suitable living environment, and the requirement that the City aPPirmatively further fair housing (Section 570.601(b) of the regulations). Programs: Continuation of the contract for services with Inland Mediation whose programs include: outreach and public information; Landlord/tenant mediation; and Counseling on fair housing laws and rights. In 1982/83, Inland Mediation handled 145 cases from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In 1983/84, they handled in excess of 160 cases, and in 1984/85 they handled 223 cases. In fiscal year 1985/86, 188 (a) cases were processed, and in 1986/87 an estimatc;l 227 cases will be handled. The agency has two paid staff members and relies primarily on volunteers to provide vital information and counseling. The grant request is proportional - based on the percentage of their cases which are in Rancho Cucamonga (approximately eight percent). 3. senior 8hareQ Houeinq (existing program) Needs Assessment Finding: There is a need for public services __ targeted at senior citizens, particularly in the area of 7nnat inn low-cost; safe housing. Objeective: To provide counseling and referral services to senior citizens. (a) This number is lower than 84/85 and the projected 86/87 activity because Inland Mediation was not in operation for ' over one month in 85/86. 24 1 Program: Continue under contract with Inland Mediation the - program that matches people who want to share their home with _ senior citizens in need o£ housing. - 4. Public Norks Iapravements (new program) Needs Assessment Finding: There is a need for certain public _ improvements in predominantly low and moderate income neighborhoods which have been targeted for rehabilitation - assistance tg prevent and eliminate blight and deterioration. These improvements would reinforce private efforts and eliminate - hazards to public health and safety. Two neighborhoods in Rancho Cucamonga have been certified by HUD as eligible for - these types of improvements - North Town and Southwest - Cucamonga. Objective: To eliminate hazards to the public health and safety and provide street improvements in areas targeted for housing rehabilitation assistance. Priority in these improvements is being given to areas whose residents are predominantly low and moderate income and to repairs which will correct health and safety hazards, thus improving the living environment. These programs will further the national goals of eliminating slums and blight and primarily benefit lou: and :oderat¢ income households. Proqrams• The Engineering Department has prepared an estimate of the cost LA.. I........ ~ ...... .....cnc .r'i a... x.. .~.r.....,.,~.,.,.~ .n „c........as,. .,....u.~,..,,ya. They are:^ Arrow Route (from Grove to Sierra Madre) 296,000 Ninth Street (from Grove to Baker) 350,000 Via carillo (entire) 208,000 Placida Court (entire) 56,000 Avenida Vej ar (Grove to Sierra Madre) 153,000 Calaveras Avenue (Ninth to Arrow Route) 270,000 Calaveras Avenue (south of Ninth Street) 149,000 Sierra Madre Avenue (north of Arrow Route) 132,000 Sierra Madre Avenue (Arrow Route to Ninth) 249,000 Sierra Madre Avenue (south of Ninth Street) 149,000 Vinmar Avenue (north of Salina) 71,000 Vinmar Avenue (south of Ninth) 135,000 Salina Avenue (Ca]averas to 3lerra Madre) 138,nnn Alley South of Ninth Street (entire) 511000 TOTAL $1,761,000 Necessary improvements include pavement rehabilitati n, construction of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and the installation of street lights. Some areas also need sanitary sewers and water line upgrading. 25 s. communitp earvices (aer program) Needs Assessment Finding: There is a need to provide recreation - facilities accessible to persons and families of low and moderate income in eligible low and moderate income neighborhoods. The two areas which qualify in Rancho Cucamonga are North Town and Southwest Cucamonga. The acquisition and development of a park in North Town was selected for funding in '- 198485 and 198586. .. Objective: To provide neighborhood parks and recreation - facilities in low and moderate income neighborhoods of Southwest Cucamonga in order to support rehabilitation of those areas and in order to meet the needs of the resiflents. Creation of these centers for community activities will improve the living environment in the surrounding low and moderate income neighborhood and support the prevention and elimination of blighting conditions, as required under the national priorities. A Community Services project suggested but not funded was: - Southwest Cucmoaga Park, which will be a multi-year program with only site acquisition proposed for this year. Two potential sites have teen identified in the area. community " Services staff requested $300,000 for site acquisition. Development of the Park is estimated to cost an additional $300,000. 26 D. THRBS-YE71R PRQTBCT BDADDIRY Based upon the comprehensive strategy outlined above, the City's three-year program for the CDBG program is summarized in the attached table. The table identifies, by program objective, the projects proposed for funding for fiscal years 1987-88, to 1988-1989. The estimated percentage breakdown of funding by objective is based upon past City experience with the Block Grant program (from 1982-86). The programs and funding allocation for the years 1987-88 are - considered estimates and may be subject to change and/or addition. The Community Development Programs to be prepared by -- the City during the next three years will continue to pursue the _ primary objective of the CDBG program; however, new and/or innovative programs may be proposed in conjunction with the one-year programs which are noL specifically identified in this three-year Community Development and Housing Plan. T8R86 YBi~B PAOfSta}l 9m4ARIC amity 95~4!l~t 4.2~ w.enC -.-^^^a-~ Estimatsl $ CDBG Potential Furdirg Commmity Development Pttposed Programs Allocation - arcl HwsSfg Objectives 1987-88 1987-89* (1987-89) 1. Housing Maintenance °HOUSing Rehab °Continuation of Up to 25% and Rdwbilitation & Repair Grant 1984-85 Program 2. Fair Housing °Inla77d Mediation °COntinuation of Up to 5% 1984-85 Program 3. c~mmanity Services - °Provision of UP to 70% dddltlCndl fdClllties 4. Street Inq~rovertents °Phase I °PCwision of Up to 70% Southwest additional Cucamonga street improve- Streets rw'its arcl public facilities *At least 51 pexcetrt of the fu7ds in eat year will be alloratsi to pfngx~anu~ -. which will directly benefit persons of low and :mdecate insane. 27 r 1V. Relocation -~ Assistance ~ a Policy 1977 IV. R8LOC11TI011 1188I8T11PCE POLICY None of the activities proposed for funding this year or - anticipated in 1987-88 would involve the displacement of residents or businesses. However, in the event that displacement should ocwr, provisions for relocation assistance will be made in conformance with the City~s adopted Relocation Policy (attached) and the requirements of federal and State law. 1 t 1 1 28 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA .~ RELOCATION ASSISTANCE POLICY r FOR THF. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLCx:R GRANT PROCMM - Receai changes in Lhe reguis[ions governing cite expenditure o[ Communt[y Development Block Grant (CDeC) funds reyui re that the CiCy establish a pclicy governing the provision of relocation ass is[:roce to any family, individual, buei nee s, nonprofit organization or farm [hat results from implementu [ion of ' its CDBG programs. I[ is [he policy o£ [he Cicy co avoid disp lac ems of Ot ail - Eamilie s, individuals, busine saes, nonprofit organizations and Ea zms in - carrying out i[a CDBG programs. No displacem¢nC is expected [o result Erom Che activities proposed for Che IYRG-N7 Fiar.al year. ' However, in Che eve of [hat operation of any of the CDBG Funded prog re ms results in Che voluntary or involuntary disylaceme nt of any Cnmily, _ individual, business, nonprof if organization, or Farm (wh¢ther owner or renter) the City will provide relocation eaa istence in ec wrda nee with the - standards end guidelines set forth in the federal Uniform Heloce cion Asaia[a ace and Real Property Acquisition A<t and Section 7260 et_seq_ of the S to [e of California Government Code (Title 25, Chapter 6) and [he guidelines _ issued by [he Commission of 'mousing and Community Development. The City will meet ica relocation re sponeibilicies through the use of iCe eceff end - coneu ltante, supplemented by assistance from local realto rs, social agencies, ..,a ,~; - It ie [he City'6 objective [he[ all dieplecees be relocated with a minimum of he rd ship in eccommodatio its which ere deceit!', safe, sanitary, end suitable to - their ind iv}dual needs; located in areas not less desirable then tt:eic current location in regard to public utilities and public end comae rcial tocilit ie s, ' and reasonably accessible [o [heir tuetome rs er places of employment; and priced within their fimnc ial meant. ' The City ant is ipaten no relocations, end vi1L handle Chose which result from implementation of CDBG a<tivitiee in an individual, cose-by-case me nn ec, Services provided to eligible displaceea shall include 6u[ no[ 6e limited [o: Providing infcrmntion on project octivities, :igh[s, b¢nefite, end options open to them. Maintaining lie icon be[vu en diapla r.ees and agent iea or firma wi [h resources to aegis[ [h ms (e.g., Chamber of Commerce, Small Business Admi ni nt ratio n, Office of Local Economic Development, lending ' inetitutio nr., realto re, etc.) t ' 29 ' Locating, innpec cing, evalw[ing, or ntimulating the produt[ion of ecc omodations to meet the needs of all displacees. ' Aneiating displacees in ob [a fining ti nancing. ' Aneiating displacees in securing priority consideration for Section 6, public how ing, or other Rousing assix t:mte programs. ' Making re Ee rrala to appropriate social, community, and velfa re agencies. ' Assisting eligible displacees [o prepn ce claims for all relocation assistance payments to which [hey are entitled. ' Keeping rat ords, maintaining Eiles, and word ina ting all relocation ec civi[ies. ° Providing all families, individuals, businesses, ins [i[ucions, and farms srh ich ere displaced by CDBG-funded programs, with written notice of this policy, [he types of aerv ice available to [hem, and Che amount o` re lace[ ion assistance benefits for uh ich they may be eligible. (Payments will be those established by Slate and Federal guidelines.) City seaff and consu Rents will 6e available co answer questions and provide information, end by [heir early involvement [n sec Cha[ relote [ion proceeds with a minimum of hardship, 30 1 ~~» V. Community Development Program 1 i v. 1987-88 COMMDMITY DSVBIAPM6NT PROGRAM In January, 1987, when City staff was given an estimate of the amount of CDHG funding to expect in the 1987-88 program year, letters were sent to all community groups and agencies which had submitted program suggestions in previous years as well as to City department heads. The following projects were suggested for funding: ° Program Administration (including Fair $ 81,700.00 Housing Services) ° Housing Rehabilitation Loans & Grants 106,000.00 (on-going program) ' Senior Shared Housing 6,300.00 (on-going program) ° Arrow Route Improvements - Design and 30,000.00 Environmental Review (new project) ' Arrow Route Improvements - North 185,OOb.00 Side Construction (new project) ° Arrow Route improvements - South 185,000.00 Side Construction (new project) ° Sierra Madre/Placida Court Improvements 185,000.00 (new project) ° Southwest Cucamonga Park - (multi- 300,000.00 year project) On March 18, 1987, the City Council held a public hearing to discuss the community's objectives for the CDBG program and to set priorities among the suggested projects. The preliminary direction was: to continue funding the residential rehabilitation grant and loan program; to continue funding for the senior shared housing program; shift the focus of CDBG-funded public improvements from the North Town Neighborhood to Southwest Cucamonga beginning with improvements in the area north of Arrow Route. give a higher priority to street and sewer imr^ovements in the area than to provision of a park. -- Project summary sheets for each of the recommended projects are attached. 31 tYN~ X~I,Y,. V l O[IwXTY\Ni O/ MOIIxNO WO VNIYN 0! V! LOIYIYI XMNVXL COYMUXI\V D(V\lO1YLMT I1100NYY 1. NXYt 01 wIIL~CexT of Rancho Cucamon a ~ROIECT tUTAMwRY ), Y•ILICXTION/ONYNi MV WI• R-87-MC-0556 o. r(luou o) uwLialsrtnv • ~ ONI INw 4M I /MY July 1, 1987 10 .Lune 30, 1988 , O L YY/ p IIWi910N, OwTIO p YmxoulNT,wno _ 1. NXY\OI YxOMCT 1fN01lCT NV WIN 1 t. (NVINONWNTIL X(VIIN STwT VS Exem t I,IXTItT1Y1TX1<({IONbIILITV rO/1CAMVIM000T TNl ggllGT Tnland Mediation 6TlLl IMON[NUWLY (714) 987-8663 Ie. DucmmoN Or .xoxCT The program will provide counseling and referral services to those lower income members of society who have special housing needs. Services will include landlord/tenant mediation, default/force Losure and discrimination counseling. p OYef i/LUnnlx/edm (ddinNW plph7lvM etaeD. Ib <[/AN 1xFCT1Yl(MVxglbOx DAUWTIN Cicywide 1) XFTICI•YTIO XCCOIOLIPNYLNi[ The program is expected to assi ,[ low-income people throughout the Cicy. rl /Y..4 it i..nn'~rW.r x4l.ri..nN....x/,I wI~Y.~w U CD(O GOWOMlNI wen VIT Yf MODPXY VEFn rUNDi lm pNxXNIND rln\pI,YOMIS<IIIr MenwW NfNNI.~Mw CO(0 OTN[R N /X'11, (VSr SUYY~IY, tpn NUD IMI,f LON/Y00 !(NIIIT OININ l\Nl/IT IYOVNT tOVXC! W (11 I<I lel Id 1'.I3Y -1{OlI51nf .SCrV iCCS ~ 9.1) ~ U s U 1(. TmYI !< 9.0 s 0 f 0 : f.)f`a',: S.~R~ , 15 Ta W Colo TO MVW WiN ComllNnM 01YelOO1M01 (f{xt OIM! FNMY f5um oI CNunw D rMCI 9.0 IWi.n .Y..xw rv.•~..ro.x..~... re(e OI VlOI __ -_._ Ul OL1•YTY)MT OI MOWINO •NOUNnAM OLYtLO1YtN< I. N•Y)OI •IIIIL•NT NwNY•LCpYrvwnr olvuolYlNT 11lOOn•Y Cit of Rmtclto Cucaman a ). •rILIC1TION/On1NT N V W! n -ao>ECiftmw~ar 8-87->tc-Ofi-0556 ). nnlou o/.nuunurv 7 D . [ f 1 1 nOY TO . x nImN•L w N4. O ptVlilON, O.LT10 July 1, 1987 June 30, 198A O 1V(NOWNT.O•YtO L N•Y{O)InOACT IINOMLI NVY.In ].\MVInONW NT.LL YI VI{w 31•T VS Housin Rehabilitation 2 (la[egorical Exclusion .. tN111Y 1YnN nnMOWIIILITY 10N C•nnYIYO 0V) TNl In0/LC1 I. T{LIINON[ MVY.! n 0 8e and ino 714 387-4573 le. oocnlmoN Or lnweeT Continuation of a ilousing Rchabilitn [inn Program that of Cers below market interest rate loans and deferred loans, co lower ineomc persons or Camil ies, and (tome improvement grunts lur minor repairs [n senior citizens an:I disabled or handicapped persona. het ivities Cundrd include: outrmch/public information, home improvement loans, and emergency repair grants (senior citizens and disabled only). C] Oast it Lmn:lY)don •Ed'norW np1fL1 rM.r:n I1. a1Yla TN~L'TnYlY11Y)n•TION ourucnn 20, 21 and Cit wide [n eligible households q •Nnnnr)o •CfgYnlleNYINT) Iiomc Improvement Loans 22 each Home Repair Grmts ?S cuci: U LTw:)//rmnlNadanddifia<W pLrhl /IIdtMM. U. COq COWONLNI •Ll1 VITaf MOGRw4 YE.n fUNOi nn I1YNwO MII R t10M1NNnISNny lwynw 11 Y`IN~eY 1•I~, COeG OTMIa Y /b1/. LWT)U)W~nY, /Yw, MUO~AIIII LOw/YOD OTMIw 140VNT IIOVNCC ILNIIIf nfNlllT W fel f<I fel IJ On trrach/ uh]ir. infnrmn[ion f 6,5 f 0 f 0 Ilo:nc improvement loots 53.0 0 0 Ilnmo rcwl it p,rnnls 4fi,6 0 0 I .. .._._ .......___i - t) Totr! f 106.0 f ! {~s:'~IV') °~'., 1L ,, 4t 15 7aW Las io M/W Wi0l CommYnlry Mrrlopl4m 6toLY GrYIt FNnb/Sumo/CwumlYnndcl {106.0 w.mww sYmnw rvn,..w,v~Ywv.~ np o{ ps{a ..__.____. `7 col iminarv es Hmn[c of (ands dl~tri but lanl funds may he all neat od in ~, ~irt in ~. i~ropn CC Lmr nmunl; thr indi Victual ,uilvitics. 1 1 ua oa.wwmaNr or xoalw wougwx oavnorwNa wNNUwacaawruwn+wvuowawrrnaowur LNwwrm •.ruc•xr ~_~~ City of Rancho Cucaman ~a FROJEDT jDRw/Enr a wrrucrmoxrow•wa wuwaw I4-87-MC-05-0556 ~. ngloo of wucwnurv rwow July 1, 1997 ro ,tune 70, 1989 + ~ omm«•c Irs rrl O wwmow, o•no O •w«ouaNr, owreo a. w.ua or rwoaacr a. rnwaca NUw[n Senior Shared Housing 3 f.awnbNwwm nawaw sr•rus Exempt E.awm+wrtxnaaroNannm ronnwnawo om r«a nwno Inland Mediation wnurwoN[NUwaw (7I4) 997-9561 IE. Daa[w D110N Or.bJICT Senior Shared (lousing matches up People whu want to share their home with senior citizens in need of )rousing. O pxER iE aorrcwwwEm rodioanal pipfU wwErnwelf. 11. CENFVE twwcrlEllEwwa11tl1ON aMlw,O}Iq IdC la •NrICN.raO wtaQYrIIENYaxTE To assist senior citizens wi[h ]Dear ing affordable housing. O CM[k ilfMlinOrOyf ~Ylpfwf p[Frh!•fNwfD[h, U. COEO COwrOx[N1 wCTVrtIEf MOOq AM Vfwq iwNOi lm pNrWM Nt/ M1MwlwMflM.r ri«Enw Nwfw,'fr fAr.rn fAEG 01NEq w Mw. c9[TEYawuRV, iMn wUDJpF/! lfNwNOO a[xlllf orNrn of xlrli ANOVNa FOYIICE W kl fd frl frl Senlur Shored (lousing _ j 6_3 j 0 j 1n.5 on t.,r;n _.____________ _...-_ __ 1 County of San u. ToWr f 6.7 j U = 30.5 ` f!~,6 v. °n};Rt IS. ToW Cww TO pFEq WIDI Commun~ry DnrlopmmlBIM GIM1 FuwM l3ww oFCWYmm DanJCI j 6.9 N.vl.a.em nw Alf 1, w«mwfllYrN Pfje of pajef Nuo roes lam r.,,~.eD.r.,, VAOlF4RTYlM10[NONINO MID YR(.«O(V(IOMIINt \, H.YF Or .MtIC.NT •NryuAL LO[Y[unn+Dw(lo•Y[«T.NDORw Cit of ncho Cucamon e ( .MIILAf10N/OR1ryl MVY\ER MOIFCT {UMRUFIY B-87-MC-06-0556 ~. rFRloo or Anla (uUrr - ~ rRDY ro e. o«mINAl Mall wl O RWMION.DATED July 1, 1987 June 30, 1988 Q wENDUtryT.O.IID ...~ {. H.Y(O/111OJ(LT SOnC}1weSC CUCHIDOnga Y.rRDI[LT NVY\(R J.INVIRONYIHT.L R(VI(«(T.TUS 4 nv r ncal Review Re (. FMT11r Y11N R((.OWI{I111Y.OR D.NRR+ING OYT TNF .ROIFR (. TELIINOM(ryVY([R C t of Rancho Cucamon a 7l4 989-1861 u. DucR\ma« or Few(n The street(s) to be included in Phase la will be deCermined by the City Council. O (Tr(R it DwnrNMdoR rtltlinorW nNDrl[1 W eHSR. n. (e N(N TIULTMII(NYMIRATION DMTMLTI(1 IJ .MICI..T(0110(OV IYNYFNT( Pavement rehabilitation, construction of concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks, sewer improvements and installation of street lights. la, COeO COWONl NT nCTrvlnEa rROGR(M rFAR rYNOL 6n My[YW N!I -__, /LN[[onaNnf~rN~nw /YM nNwNrlsMiliN Maw CO(G OTNFR Y,MA, Lrlf)FUYYA(Y, IRm HUO)Q),l tOR/Y00 OTN(R ((N(rlT ((NIIIT .MOVNi {OVRCI MI fq kl lel fJ To be determined by City Council = = 3 '~ _ -_ --_ - 1 ~ r 4 < 15 TotY Cwn TD 4 VW WiN Communlry OwdODNYn1 llad GIM\ FNDA f5vnr olCwumM 0 Ynd LI Lred ' boiRY rwm NU9~A1(1, Iw,q NOYeNa P[p DI peFee Nuo taeum ~~ Tar9~t Ar~• 14 `' M Sty __ __ r" f• 1 1 ~ I ' I I M~ 1 ~ F LM i ' ~ _ .. . ~ 1 _ r ~ V _} -, ' 1 ti t*j .. 9^' n ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 -- ~-«i ~ {; . l MH ~~ , I\ \ .~~..1 _,. 1 Southwest Cucamonga No Scale Street Improvements: Phase I ~ r~ i VI. Housing Assis4ance Plan (- . ~.1 ~'&^DpprtlwMM Md INOan ppwppnwr fl 1a 15 W~,1015mpk aow...ro _ ~~ La, ~nppw4 OtlI1prM~ p0015-aapi ~ -, 4'~~ °t~Y 1 ' 1966 -- Mr. Lauren Masserman City Manager - City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 801 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. ilas5ernlan: _ SUBJECT: Community Development 81otk Orant Program No. 8-81-MC-06-0556-City of Rancho Cucamonga - Annual Housing Assistance Plan Approval In accordance with 24 CFR 570.306 and current instructions, thfs ,_ office has reviewed your Mnual Housing Assistance Plan for the period October 1, 1986 thru September 30, 1987. Based on our review, we find your Housing Assistance Plan to be acceptable and it is therefore approved. Accanplishments toward your goals will be reviewed annually as - reported in your HAP Performance Reports and as a result of our moni- toring of your program. ~1 I Sincerely, i -,-`. BenJamin F. Bobo, Ph.D. ~+~ Manager Los Angeles Office, 9.45 ~€ ~ ~ 0 , o ~n ~ 1 ~ ~ F v N ~ o m N m ~~. ~. 1 ~ m ~ < f ~ g J ~ r ~ 0 0 0 ~ > > 1 U O ~ J J O N 0 0 0 0 U p ~J Z 3 N ~ j m ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ c ~ r ~ n .+ o ~n o 0 ao m j ~ y p J N u ~ r l s U E o S O0 w mE S{ M .O A A t^ ~~ ~ Y x v w v ~ ~ ~a __--- R t 4s ~ ~ N .N.n ~ N ~ ti va ~ S • ~ ` 'VG S _ M 3 f ~ ;~ ~ d E ~ ~ ~ A V ~[ C ~ f ~ 4 0 N O C N ~ g ~ 2uW ~ ~yy ~ ~ ~ 0 a do ~ W '- f ~t Q 2 d C a ` " m ~ F ! i Z ~ ^ W~ ~ q y 4 ~ ~ 8 y y~ ` v o u c m 4 ~ ¢ ~ ~ j d u u ( . w c m~ F N N N a ' j v P! 'y n Y ® ~ i N e0 09 .1 b ' N N L ~ 5 ~ ae v O ~ 0 y~ !+ S i ~ ~ m 4 N C b C V i Wmi ~ 6 s i ~ i u N C N C 'T V d '> N d N N.1 N N O ~ N K d ~-df A N L o0 F d p ~ ~ I g 3 ~ . ~ A A Y d PW C l > O u d L Y ~ ~ 4 O m F t W d C .Ci u L ~ e U O = y ~ ~ o aY0 ~ o u G ~ . u m VT C H C ~ d.+ L x N V V N S a ~+ ~ ~ e S ~ ~ R s y N m .1 vl .C z F # ~. ria~ Ya~ CITY OP AANCNO CUCAMONGA ' NARRATIVE FOR TARBB-YEAR AND ONE-YEAR GOALS 1986-1988 ROUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN I. Displacement No substandard units are expected to be demolished or lower income households relocated as a result of direct Federal, State, or local actions. II. Actions the City Will Take to Implement Its One and Three Year Goals: A. Mortgage Revenue Bonds (owner) The Redevelopment Agency sells mortgage revenue bonds !o provide below market mortgage financing for owner occupants. Most users will be moderate income, none are expected to be low income. Issues funding an estimated 1,500 mortgagee have been sold in the past three years. The goal will be realised, therefore, subject only to market conditions and the developers' ability to develop end sell the homes. B. Multi-Family Revenue Bonds (rented By cooperation agreement with the County of San Bernardino, rental projects in Rancho Cucamonga with 2u percent oL the units restricted to low income households at rents leas than 30 percent of income, may be financed with County Multi-family Mortgage Revenue Bonds. Some 385 additional unite have been proposed. Developer interest is currently very strong. Bowever, market conditions and developer performance will dictate whether the unite committed are completed. C. CDBG Rehabilitation Loans Through a contract with the County of San Bernardino, the City offers low interest rehabilitation loans to lower income houa eholds citywide. Approximately 8.5 units per year oc 25 unite anticipated to be brought up to stands rd through tole program. However, in 1985-86 only Eour loans were completed although severnl more are in process. All owners are lower income. 1 D. Rental Rehab Loans Rental Rehab loans are given only to structures to be occupied solely by lower income renters. Rents after rehab may not exceed 30s of tenant income. Pive units were anticipated to be brought up to stnndard through Chia program during 1985-86, but no loans were completed. In order to improve the performance of the rehabilitation loan program, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will undertake a publicity campaign to make eligible houeeholda and property owners aware of the programs and the possible benefits of participation. Section S Hxieting for successor program3 The City has entered a cooperation agreement with the __ Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino to administer the Section B Sxisting prog cam. The goals - reflect the reduced funding for Chia program and the fact that rents in the City are often higher than Pair - Market Rents. However, theca is a good potential of using 8action 8 Bxieting in the density bonus affordable housing to be produced as a part of the large planned developments under construction in the City. F. Article XX%IV Referendum Authority The voters of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved a referendum allowing public ownership or financing of ~' iuw am,L 'i :y ~L•r_CS^t t^ arhicl r. XX%IV Of the ' State Constitution. This enables use of public housing and various multi-family financing programs. There are currently eleven units of scattered site public housing in the City. r The City has entered into a Cooperation Agreement with the Housing Authority of the County o£ San Bernardino ' for use of the Public rnticipated for th is Housing Program. No program in the second funding is Housing Assistance Plan year. However, agreements are in place should fundiny become available. G. Affordable Housing In cen Cives State law requires cities to offer incentives (including public improvements or density bonuseal to any project with at least 251 of the units effordnble ' to low and moderate income houeeholda. Several of the Planned Communities in Rancho Cucamongn contain _ comwitments for the development of affordable housing in the text of the approved oz proposed Community Plan. Tha developer commits to develop a percemtage of units at prices or rants affordable to lover income -- households, in exchange for City incentives. R. Redevelopment 201 of Tex Increment funds from the City's redevelopment proiecta rill be used to usist for income bouaing development as necessary and as funds become svailable. C4F.b 3 cosmilmenta for the development of affordable housing in the text of tha approved or proposed Comaunity Plan. The developer commits !o develop a percentage of units at prices oz zenta affordable to lower income households, in exchange for City incentives. H. Redevelopment 20~ of Tax Increment Punda from the City's redevelopment projects will be used to assist low income housing development as necessary and as funds become available. t 96.b 3 commitments for the development of affordable housing in the text of the approved or proposed Community plan. Tha developer commits to develop a percentage of units at prices or rents affordable to lower income households, in exchange for City incentives. B. Redevelopmeai 20t of Tax Increment funds from the City's redevelopment projects rill be used to assist for income hoaxing development ae neceaeary and ae funds become available. 1 a4~ .b 3 commitments for the development of affordable housing in the text of the approved or proposed Community Plan, The developer commits to develop a percentage of units at prices or rents affordable to lower income households, in exchsnge for City incentives. R. Redevelopment 20f of Taz Increment funds from the City's redevelopment projects will be used to assist low income dousing development ea necessary and as funds become available. 44f b 3 J '~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - a _ ~ .,,.. Hal.7 XieR ~ $ ~ G..,,.,.,, - u 1977 Chvin J. Bpml D Jm D. aEkW RkEW at DW Puve41. WriRh October 16. 1986 °Ein°~aJiN7mn°ulo"M° _ OCT :01986 Mr. Herb Roberts ar~Ea7weo1REC7DR - Community Planning and Development Division _ U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Los Angeles Area Office - Region IX _ 1615 West Olympic Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90015-381 Re: Second Year Annual Goals _ Rancho Cucamonga Housing Assistance Plan - B-86-MC-06-0556 - Dear Mr. Roberts: Attached please find the second year annual goal for the Housing _ Assistance Plan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City Council's action approving the HAP. The goals and narrative reflect past program - accamplfshments and the nu~ers are consistent with the approved three year Housing Assistance Ptan (HAP). The Annual Goal for 1986-87 reflects the following estimates: (1) In the three year HAY, we estJmacea chat 7a aaaltlonal households or 24 per year would be assisted under the Section 8 rent assistance program. We pro,)ected that seven of these would be elderly households, ten small families, and seven large families. Information from the San Bernardino County Housing Authority indicates that we should achieve this goal. Therefore, we have used the same annual goal for next year. (2) The total number of units to be assisted in the CDBG Senior Repair Program exceeded the annual goal of 25 units. We have seen a consistent participatf on rate for this program for each of the past two years. Therefore we have adopted the same annual goal for next year. However, we fell five units short of our goal of nine CDBG repair iuans to owners for 1465-86, although a number of loans were in progress but mat completed at the end of the year. We have adjusted the goal for this program because we anticipate that the planned public outreach program will increase participation. - 9130 BASELn18 ROAD, SUREC ~ P08T OFFICE ROX a07 ~ RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA 917X1 ~ plq 9a9~1 i11 Mr. Roberts October 15, 1986 Second Year Annual Goals Page 2 (3) The rental rehab program operated by San Bernardino County did not assist any units in Rancho Cucamonga last - year, however, we are hopeful that it will be successful -- in 1986-87. The annual goal has been ad,iusted to reflect this. _ (4) The total number of units to be assisted under the multi-family rental revenue bond program has been cantlnued at 35 affordable units (or 167 total units). This program has been very popular in the City. Several -- pro,)ects have been approved but not completed. We do not anticipate any problems meeting this goal (lines lb and 18 of the three year NAP). If have any questions about these changes, please contact our onsul nt,/}}aura Hudson at (213) 681-2061 or Otto Kroutil, Senior Planne a ~Cammunity Development Coardfnator at (714) 989-1861. Thank you fo y consideration in this. Otto OK:tlak Attachment t9~; VII. Citizen Participation Affidavit of publication will be inserted as soon as available. G~M~N ~~o c9 ~ ~ r z VIII. Certifications ~I 1977 . CE1tT I P 1 GT1tYt3 TAe grentce certifies that: (a) It posseaes legal eutMrity to make a grant aubmision and to execute a community development and Rousing progrsm; (D) Its governitg body Ras duty adopted or passed as en official act a resolution, motion or eimBer action eutAcrizing the person identifie0 as the of(icinl repreaentativc of the grentce to submit the final statement end ell understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing and authorizing tAe person identified as the officini representslive of the grantee to act in connection wltA the submission of tAe final statement and to provide sucA additions! infarmelim as may De requtred; (c) Prior to submission of its tine! statement to HUD, tAe grantee has: (l) met the citizen participation requirements of 45T0.301(e)l2) end has provided citizens with: (A) tAe estimate o! tAe amount o! CDB(i fordo proposed to be used for activities tAat will benefit pettwre of low and moderate Ind.,,, .fin (B) its pion for minimizing displacement of persons as a result of eetivities assisted witA CDBG funds and to assist persons ectunlly displaced as a result of such activities; (2) prepared its final statement of community development objectives and projected use of funds in accordance with S 570.301(x)(3) and made the final statement svailnDle to tAe public; (d) The grunt will be conducted and administered In cromp[isnce with: (1) Title Vf of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub. L. 86-352; 42 US.C. 2000d et seq.); onA (c) T(tic Y6i of llx Civil Rights Act ut 1660 (PUD. L. 90-264; i"< U.S.C. 3601 et sec .} (e) it wtU affirmatively further fair housing; February 1864 5 ' ,. .';S (f) It has developed Its pool riatemenl of projected use of funds so as to give maximum feasible priority to eclivtties which benefit low end moderate income families ar aid in the prevention ar elimination of slums or blight' (the final statement of projected use o[ funds may also include activities which the - grantee certifies are designed to meet other community development needs _ having s particular urgency because existing ronditioru pax a seriout and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community, end other firwtciel _ resources ere not available); except that the aggregate use of CDpC funds received under section 108 of the Acl end, if applicable, under section 108 of the Acl, during 1986-87 (s period specified Dy the goatee consisting of !, 2, _ ar 0 program ywrs , she principally benefit persons of low and moderate income in a manner that ensures that not less than 8l percent of such funds ere -- used for activities that benefit such persons during such period; . - (gl It has developed o community development plan, for the period specified in - perogreph (f) above, that Identities community development end housing needs end specifies both short and long-term community development objectives that - have been developed in secordence with the primary objective end reQuirements __ of the Act; _ (h) It it following a curtent housing assistance plan which Ms Deen approved Dy HUD pursuant to S 6T0.10s; (i) f1 will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public Improvements asisted fn whole a in pert with funds provided under section I06 of the Act or with amounts resulting from ^ guarantee under section lOB of the Act Dy esessing env amount aRStnst properties owned end occupied by o_ ersont of low •nn moderate income, including any fee charged a assessment made as a condition of obtaining access to such public improvement, unless: (1) funds received under section 106 of the Act ere rued to pot' the proportion of such fee or assessment that relates to the capita] costs of such public improvements that arc financed from revenue sources other tJ~an raider Title I the Act; or (2) for purposes of assessing any amount a5•ainst properties owned and occupied by persons of low and moderate income who ore nut persons of low Income, the grantee certifies to the Secretary that it Iecks sufficient funds received under section 106 of the Act to comply with the requin•menu of suDperogreph (I1; en4 (j) It will ram ply with the other provisions of the Acl en4 with other applicable lows. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM April 15, 1987 From: John A. Futscher, fapt Ain Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Station To: Lauren Wasserman, City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga Subjects: CITIZENS' CONCERNS REGARDING SIERRA MADRE, CALAVERAS AND SALINAS STP.E F.TS EETWEEN NINTH AND ARROW The problems expressed 6y the citizens of the above area fall into three categories: Burglaries; Gang Activity; and Speeding Vehicles. The following is an overview of each of these problem areas. BURGLARY - A review of the Daily Logs since January 1, 1937 indicaf es that the reporting district wiehin which the above streets are ]ocated was in fact haviny a resi- dential burglary problem. During the three-month period surveyed. it ww= o.. ~~-a .,__ ~„_, .~. 3L restaentlal buryl Aries in that repor t4ing district. cThe district ex- tends from 3th Street to Foothill Boulevard and from Grove Avenue to Vineyard Avenue. In February, officers from the Rancho Cucamonga Station arrested a burglary suspect by the name of Carlos Paredes. Thts- subject has been directly connected with 23 of the 30 burglaries. Since his arrest, there have only been three residential burglaries in that area. Additionally, the Patro] Division has been requested to increase the amount of burglary patrol during the day and evening shifts. [:ANr. ACT?PITY - ...e Stacion r.qo~ _-_. ~. -- -sai ned y to investigate the presence of gang activity ^iyn the area. Attachod is a Report from Deputy Guerra that indicates Memo To Lauren Wasserman, City Manager April 15, 1987 page Two that there is in fact a gang in the formation stages. However, at this time it lacks formal structure with the exception that a Manuel Vargas purports to be the Vice President. Initial information leads us to believe that the gang consists of approximately 15 members. Our Gang Officer, along with the Patrol Divisions will take appropriate measures to curb the gang activity. TRAFFIC - Our Traffic Safety Division was given a special enforcement assignment to work the area for speeders ar.d other moving violations. That enforcement program has continued since the initial assignment and will continue periodical]}• until The problem has been mitigated. CRIME PREVENTION - Our Crime Prevention Unit has Stepped up their activity in the area and has met with the two Neighborhood Watch groups. Channels of direct communication have been opened and it is hoped that this will prevent the problems Erom becoming a crisis. 1 :amp INTEROFFICE MEMO lw, DATE .March 26, 1987 PHONE FROM Virgil R. Merrett, Sergeant r Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Station Oasslr of ~ ~sedYo TO John A. Futscher, Captain Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Station SUBJECT RESIDENTIAL BURGLARY STATUS - REPORTING DISTRICT 406 SURVEY AREA: The aria surveyed was Reporting District 406, being the geographical area of the residential neighborhoods, west of Vineyard Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard, City of Rancho Cucamonga. The time frame used for the survey was from November 25, 1986 to March 4, 1987, approximately a three-month period of time. RESIDENTIAL BURGLARIES OCCURED - CASE STATUS: During the three-month period of time used for the survey, 30 residential burglaries have occurred to residences loca- ted within Reporting District 406. A breakdown of the 30 burylaries which hove occurred during the survey period shows 9 of the residential burglaries have been cleared by the arrest of Carlos Paredes. Those or physical evidence at ^[he^'s cene.•h An-eddit ional~l4~cases are extremely similar in the Suspect's method of operation, property taken, time frame and geographical location of the burglaries. However, it cannot be proved to hove been committed by suspect, Carlos Paredes. Of the remaining 7 cases, 5 of them have been inactivated with no suspect leads or identifiable prints and 2 cases are currently still open in an attempt to develop additional investiga- tive leads regarding suspects. OVERVIEW: In a three-month period of time, 30 residential burglaries occurred in the southwest corner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Of the 30 r?sidenrial burglaries, approximately 2J of them can be directly contributed to suspect, Carlos Paredes who has been taken into custody and some property recovered. Suspect Paredes was arrested on February 24, 1987 which leaves only 3 residential burglaries occurring iS iH1AW Iln MO Memo To John A. Futscher, Captain Page Two in that area since suspect Paredes' arrest during the sur- vey period. A breakdown of those 3 cases showed them all to he on the west side of the survey areas south of Arrow. Pzoperty taken was 1 VCR, 1 bike and 1 radio. Those 3 cases since Paredes' arrest nave no developed sus- pects. Catent prints lif eed from the scenes have been submitted foz CAL SD comparison for possible suspect iden- tification. During the time frame of the survey conducted, Detective Terrell spent numerous hours in that geographical area conducting an on-going investigation into the residential burglaries, which were occurring in the area, due to a similar pattern from the suspect. Deputy Guerra, the gang officer, nssisted in the investigation which centered in the residential area, the San Gabriel Labor Camp and the apartments to the west of the labor camp. That investiga- tion culminated in the service of 4 search werrenta in the immediate area with approaimntely 15 suspects being arrested and 70 pieces of property being recovered Ecom residential burglaries. That investigation was culminated on February Z4, with the arrest of Carlos Paredes and ser- vice of search werrenta. mince the culmination of that investigation, [here have been a few residential burglaries occur in that area, be- lieved to have been committed by other local residents known rn rhix nffin• ro he involved in huralariex and theft s. Detective Terrell has been reassigned to conduct an on-[ping investigation to the more recent set of residential bur- glaries still occurring in that area and hoe spent several hours in the past two weeks assisted by other detectives in field contacts, additional plain clothes patrol during daylight hours in an attempt to identify and arrest the suspects involved in the more recent residential hurglaries occurring in Ghat repotting district. V R~ M`:~dln p INTEROFFICE MEMO 1~~ DwTE :Narch 31,1987 pHOryE FROM :Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's ime Prevention Unit. TO :John Futacher, Captain ca.oaarasw Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's ion. SUBJECT NEIGR$ORROOD WA~S1i GAOUP 261/REPORTING DISTRICT 406. The Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Crime Prevention Unit has made contact with the citizens living in the area of Sierra Madre and surrounding neighborhoods. The persons at the meeting seemed to coma away from it with a postiva plan of action. The citizens in this area reporting district 406 realized that their area was averaging five residential burglaries a month since January 1987. Tha group has been updated on the basics of Neighborhood Watch and on reporting all suspicious activities in their areas. Just in the month od March the Crime Prevention has aeon somewhat of a deduction in the number of raaidential burglarise for the reporting distret. We feel that this La due co preventive aducatioa of the people in thn affected area. As for the traffic accidents and traffic citations that era ueiua iisudu i 'r, "::~ ~r~i,..^ Dw~~.~uN :o IIMr n_~~n~ determine actual~numbere~at~thie time,but feel thac bacaue• the citizens have become more aware of reporting occurrences in their area the number of traffic problems occuring in that area will be reducsd. Tha citizens in the accacted area have had numerous complaints about the gang activity in their neighborhoods. This information has been forwarded to the Gaag Officer and patrol. Tha Crime Prevention Unit has bean informed that patrol La providing extra patrol and obtaining extra F.I.s to gain intelligence information on gang members. I ] I Mf-000 M. Mt INTER-OFFICE MEMO DATE April 1, 1987 PHONE ~ ~~ FROM Hector A. Guerra, Deputy Rancho Cucamonga Station TO John A. Putscher, Captain Rancho Cucamonga Station SUBJECT CUCAMONGA DOG PATCN GANG The following will be a memorandum regarding reports of possible gang activity in the area of Rancho Cucamonga commonly known or referred to as "Dog Patch". GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION The area commonly known as "Dog Patch" is primarily centered in the residential area south of Arrow Highway to 8th Street and west of Baker Avenue to Grove Avenue. See attached map for further. GANG NANB/AFFILIATION/TERRITORIAL MARKINGS 1. "Cucamonga Dog Patch Boys" 2. "Los Dead End Hoods" 3. "CDP" (Cucamonga Dog Patch) 4. "IE SUR" (Inland Empire South) Identifiable markings or graffiti found on walls, buildings, curbs, etc., in the Dog Patch area indicates that the group of individuals are calling themselves the "Cucamonga Dog Patch Boys" and also "Los Dead End Hoods". Additionally, they are indicating affiliation with the "Inland Empire" group of gangs which have direct ties to the Southern California, Inland Empire area jail/prison gangs. The name "Inland Empire", when referred to gangs, is a name identification that the hispanic gangs have given themselves to indicate territorial origin. IDENTIFICATION OF MEMBERS AND MONIKERS The Dog Patch area is sparsely marked with graffiti, indi- cating terrirorial boundaries and current members 6y moniker (nickname) of the so-called Dog Parch gang. The graffiti is primarily concentrated to the block wall lcoated at the dead end of Calaveras Street, south of 9th Street, Chus the name "Los Dead End Hoods". The graffiti indicates a total of fifteen (151 members by moniker or nickname. The monikers are listed on the block wall on Calaveras Street, south of 9th Street in IJ~I J6 ha0o Rh, 1/)1 Memo to John A. Futscher, Captain April 1, 1987 Page Two IDENTIFICATION OF NENHERS AND NONIRERSx Cont'd the following order: 1. Joker 6. Smokey 11. John Boy 2. Beaver 7. Albert 12. Popoy 3. Cyco II 8. Bobby 13. Grizzly 4. Perico 9. Scorpio 14. Sleepy 5. Crazy 10. Melenas 15. Boxer Normally, the first name listed on a group of monikers indicates that person is either the one who did the writing or the leader of the gang. In this case it would be "Joker". To this date, only two (2j persons have been identified by moniker: "Scorpio" - Carlos Gutierrez 8638 Calaveras "Grizzly" - Nick Perez 8546 Baker There has also been intelligence information compiled on residences and families in that area who are possibly involved with the gang activity by either membership or association. GANG STRUCTURE All intelligence information gathered indicates that the so-called "Cucamonga Dog Patch Gany" has no formal structure. The graffiti is in no apparent order of rank and has been placed on the walls recently. However, the fact that these individuals are gathering on a regular basis, identify- ing themselves as a gang by name, and marking their terri- tory, indicates they have every intention of, and potential of, becoming a vary active gang in that area. From the information obtained, it is my opinion that the ~~nog Patch Gang" is a newly formed group of individuals intending to gain notoriety as a gang through related activities. I feel that because it is a fairly new group, the sheriff's office has a very good chance in putting a stop to their activites and destroying the gang prior to them getting out of control. Field interrogation informa- tion taken on possible members, indicates that the group Memo to John A. Futscher, Captain April 1, 1987 Page Three STRUCTURB Cont'd is a conglomeration of persons who actually live in the Dog Patch area, along with persons From the "Upland 9th Streeters"•(9th Street west of Grove Avenue) and persons from the Ontario 8th Street and Baker Avenue area. CURRHNT ACTIVITY In reviewing the daily logs for any possible gang activity in the Dog Patch area, it appears as though the majority of the related calls are of the disturbing the peace nature, stemming from gathering of small groups of possible gang members being vociferous, playing loud music, and drinking alcoholic beverages during the late afternoon and early evening hours. As for criminal activity normally associated with gangs, such as violence (fights, shootings, stabbings), there have been none reported in recent months. The narcotic activity, which is also associated with gangs, appears to be minimal due to a low number of narcotic related calls and arrests. My personal narcotics related contacts and arrests for that area with any of the possible gang members were ueually for under the influence of PCP. The residential burglaries, since January 1987, for that area have averaged five (5) per month with a noticeable decrease for the month of March. This is per the Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Crime Prevention Unit. There is no information which indicates that this somewhat high average is in any way gang related. PREVHNTIVH MBASURHS NBHDHD The complaints by residents of the Dog Patch area regarding the possibility of gang activity have been relayed to patrol deputies, along with the information obtained on possible gang members. Patrol deputies have been requested to extra patrol the area, make as many contacts with possible gang members to obtain FI's, and take every possible action to de *_er any type of gatherings and/er gang activity. I feel that with high visibility and increased contacts with these persona, the activities of this group will be greatly impaired and will diminish. HAG:lkh ->• : . ~„ - ~ ~.. . ~ ~ -. . n ~ ...,.x ~ _ ~• ~ ~ s '~ R '~ `. - ~. • 00 AY ~ 'tZ RAS AV o G LAMEIM CT tows VINMAR .., ~ i 4 _ ~ •~~:-~`.'~~"~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ AY '~M NrACIN7N Sl~ D A ~ ~!!~..~ .. I ~ .. ~ . AY y ~ r. ~f rrw- AY •• ~~ ,. •~ rr 3I • _ - imp ~ ST __ . .. ~~ . r-..Ti ~ a SEE MAP w ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 16, 1987 T0: or and Meabers of the City Council FROM Brad Buller, City Planner SUBJE T: MA6LEY SUPER SPEED TRAIN Attached fs a meso that was referenced during the City Council's discussion of the speed train and AB 1839. A copy of this ~eAO is also being forwarded to the City Clerk for the record. cc: Lauren Masserautn Beverly Auglel~t Jack ltu ~ INTEROFFICE MEMO ,.s~ DATE February 13, 1987 PHONE 4144 ~~ FROM STEVE WILSON, D' ion Chief Countywide section ~jd~ TO SHARON W. HIGHTOWER, Planning Officer cwe~~or s.n M,uraim Office of Planning SUBJECT MAGLEV - COi1NTY REVIEW AND PERMITTING AUTHORITY The determination of lead agency for CEQA review is usually a function of the number and significance of permits issued by various agencies when a multijurisdictional project is proposed. in the case of the Maglev train proposed by the City of Las Vegas, the most likely candidate for lead agency status should be the Cal ifornla Public Utilities Commission (PUC). Another state agency which may be an appropriate lead agency is Cal Trans. It is a possibility, although somewhat remote, that since [he project is proposed to be located in only one county in the state, namely San Bernardino County; we could be asked to be the lead agency. Other possible state agencies and local jurisdictions issuing permits include: State Land Commission Air Resources Board Fish b Game City of nnt~rie City of Vic torville City of Barstow Since a number of federal agencies will also be issuing permits, a lead agency for NEPA needs to be determined. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is probably the most obvious choice, but other agencies issuing permits include: Forest Service Department cf Transportation Environmental Protection Agency Corp of Engineers Fish 6 Wildlife Tf t,`,e state agencies are unable to resolve the matter of lead agency for the preparation of the EIR, the Office of Planning b Research's (OPR) Permit Assistance ste£f will make the decision. We are not sure of the federal process for determining lead agency status, but wh is he~~er agency is determined will most likely seek agreement with the lead agency for CEQA for the preparation of the Joint EIS/EIR. ~~ ue+ooo a.. ees '~ Memo to Sharon W. Hightower February 13, 1987 Page Two The most likely outcome of all of this is that the PUC will be the lead agency for the preparation of a joint EIS/EIR for Ma glee. The County's only land use authority would be for aupport facilities such as stations, (proposed locations are within cities), maintenance yards, transforms rs, etc. These permits would be issued as site approvals, plot plans, and/or building permits. There are numerous policies in the General Plan which could either support or be in conflict with the proposal due to their general nature. SAW:bd ~vv'Y'ivn~~iY ~~.I~(7i"//f/ln .~- ~~ ~ :'AMAK XJl7i9. ~ .~/~ r: ~ .i~ ~/ ~~~~~ n( M ~ J'l/~~? v CIT'YOF RANCHO CUCAMON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEMORANDUM DATE: AprH 13, 1987 TO: Redevelopment Agency Board, Executiv Dirac r FROM: Jack Lam, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: EXHIBITS FOR AGEN~~CI' M 1, HFA EXTENSION REQUEST Please find attached the following missing exhiDita Prom the above agenda item: 1. Executed Agreement for the extension request 2. Letter of support from Carter Hawley Hale The letter and agreement was received Monday morning. Please add these exhibits to your ege~a. Thanks. JL:vc attachments CU M ,~ ~'~ ~ ~n O > V ~ 2 > 1977 - - ~• Carter Hawley Hale r../. c+la.eott vtxe rma~aen: April 9, 1987 The Honorable Dennis Stout Chairman, Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency P O Box 807 9320 Hase line Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730 Attention: Mr. Jack Lam Dear Mayor Stout: We are advised that The Hahn Company is zeguestinq a 36-month extension to the effective dates of the Owner Participation Agreement for the Victoria Gardens Shopping Center. In our roles of Major Department Store and Partner, we wish to express our firm's support of that request. It is our expectation that this extension will provide us sufficient time to monitor the market area and have a better idea as to an appropriate time for opening of the project. We cn..t •Fn :Yn is nll 1nnaYeA nA fio cvnollonh 1nnaH nn for a major regional shopping center. We are aware of the growth of the area and our sales upturn in Montclair Plaza gives us even greater expectations for the future in the entire valley. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Please be assured that we will continue to work closely with the developer and your staff in order to bring this project to a timely opening. Since 1 ~`~~ ,f- / r,. .i .a ldrr_oY/it/,/t`~wJ(r/ EJC:jic S6~Sb~ah Fnwe~SVeet TM1n Btmdway- Elnpouum Cepwell BagdoelGwtlman Curler Hawley Haie PO BOx 1-?02 Southern Cehb,ma ThaNime,a Conmmpo Caz+mis inlorr anon Srrncrs ns Angelez Cah(orn 1a 90010 Th°Broedwap John N'enemaFer Ne~men Meraa Cartm Hawley Meln .., ~I620 0160 lklex 67~Z64 Bo~¢hweat VkwmckY Market Servaen SECOND AMENDMENT TO RANCHO DEVELOPMENT • PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT (Rancho Development Project) THIS AMENDMENT (the "Amendment") is entered into as o£ the day of , 1987, by and between the RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (the "Agency") and HPA ASSOCIATES, a California general partnerhhip in which ERNEST W. HAHN, INC., a California cocpozation ("Hahn"), and POOTHILL ASSOCIATES, a California general partnership ("POOthill"), are partners ("Redeveloper"). RECZTALS• Agency and Redevelopee are all of the parties to that certain Redevelopment Participation Agreement (Rancho Development Project) dated March 19, 1984 (the "RPA"). S. Exhibit C to the "APR" (Exhibit "C") is a Schedule of Performance pursuant to which Agency and Redeveloper are obligated to pecf orm certain acts within the time limits set forth therein. • C. Pursuant to Section 8.3 of the "RPA", Agency and Redeveloper desire to extend the times of performance set forth in Bxhibit "C" in the manner set forth herein. NOW THERE PORE, in conside Cation of the foregoing x ecirais, the mucuai cuvenance anu ayceemeuca cuolaiueu iieiei n, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Agency and Redeveloper agree as follows: All times of pecf or mance shown on Exhibit "C" which ace scheduled on or after May 30, 1987, ace extended thirty-six (36) months, as mole particularly set forth in revised "Exhibit C", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. !//// /// / ///// //// ® ///// //// -1- B. Redeveloper's obligation pursuant to Section ZIi, • D Of Exhibit "D" Of the RPA is deemed satisfied. HPA ASSOCIATES a California general partnership By: Ernest W. Hahn, Inc., a California corporation dba "The Hahn Company" BY: i:, r. Title: ice President, Development BY: ~-- I . lJ a Title: GENERAL COUNSEL RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ATTEST: By: • Lauren M. Wasserman Secretary 4066E _Z_ EXHIBIT "C" REVISED SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE GENERAL PROVISIONS Execution of A reement b A enc , The Agency and the City Counci will hold a public hearing to authorize execution of this Agreement and an agreement be- tween Agency and the Redeveloper respecting Site Parcel B (the "Parcel B Agreement"). If authorized, the Agency shall approve and execute this Agree- ment and the Parcel B Agreement, and shall deliver four (4) counterpart originals of each Agreement to the Redeveloper. Within 30 days after the date of execution and submission of this Agree- ment by the Redeveloper, or such later time as the parties may agree, but in any event not later than March 30, 1984. Redevelo er's Good Faith De osit. e Re eve oper s a e ver to the Agency the Redeveloper's Deposit. Concurrently with the delivery of the Tax Allocation Bond issue No. 1 proceeds by the Agency. A enc Tax Allocation Bond Issue o. Pursuant to Section 4.1 of the Agreement, the Agency shall issue its bonds, or obtafn other funds as set forth in the Financing Plan, Exhibit "D". Submission-Preliminar Master Pl an. and Use Perm t___pp: icatior., The Redeveloper shall prepare and submit to the Agency and the City the Preliminary Master Plan and Use Permit Application for the develop- ment of the Site. Not later than March 30, 1984. provided that in any event the Tax Allo- cation Bond Issue No. 1 in an amount sufficient to enable the Agency to pay the cash portion of the purchase price for Site Parcel A (i.e. 62,250,000), plus related casts and expenses (including interest on any advance by Redeveloper), shall be completed by May 15, 1984. Not later than June 1, 1984. -1- • l I II A 5. Review and A royal-Preliminar Not later than ,luly 1, 1984. Master Pan. T e Agency sta f s~ia-)T review and attest to the completeness of the Preliminary Master Plan. 6. Environmental Assessment. The Not later than August 1, 1984. Re eve oper s a prepare and sub- mit at.l necessary environmental assessments, or such other per- tinent environmental documents with respect to all of the improvements to be developed and constructed on the Site and pursuant to this Agreement. 7. A royal of Master Plan and Use Not later than September 30, Permit. The gency s a cause 1984. t e Master Plan and Use Permit for the Site to be such as to permit the development, construction, use, operation and maintenance of the improvements specified in this Agreement to be developed and con- structed thereon, including the filing of a Notice of Determination. PROPERTY ACQUISITION Site Parcel p A re~ent. The Agency and the Concurrently with the r:r„ _ Ott ~:n t,,.te .,~.wu. ...:__ _ .._ _ .. ... ,.,. .,. ...~ ~ .o.. hearing to authorize execution Agreement .y` of an agreement with the present owner of Site Parcel A (the "Parcel A Agreement"). If authorized to execute the "Parcel A Agreement", the Agency shall approve and execute said Agreement and shall deliver two counterpart o rigf nals to the present owners of Site Parcel A. 2. Acquisition. The Agency shall Immediately prior to complete the acquisition of the the transfer of Site Site Parcel A. Parcel A to Redeveloper. _p_ ' B. Site Parcel B • 1. Eminent Domain. The Agency shall By April 18, 1984. adopt a ResoTion of Necessity and take such other steps as are necessary to comoence eminent domain proceedings to acquire Site Parcel B. 2. Title. The Agency shall complete Not later than the acquisition and transfer to September 1, 1985. Redeveloper of fee title to Site Parcel B. III. CONVEYANCE ANO CONSTRUCTION 1. 0 enin of Escrow. The Agency On or before Narch s a open t e escrow for the 30, 1984. conveyance of the Site. 2. Transfer of Site to Redeveloper: A.Site Parcel A. The Agency Concurrently with the sha convey t tle to the Site delivery of the Agency's Parcel A to the Redeveloper, the Bonds referred to in Redeveloper shall accept such Section I-3 above, but conveyance, and the escrow not later than April 4, pertaining thereto shall close. 1984. • B. Possession of Site Parcel 8. By not later than The gency s a e ver September 1, 1984. possession of Site Parcel B, and P~ ~+ ~ to Redeveloper in spect thereto, accordance with Section 9.2 of the Agreement. 3. Submission of Construction Not later than Adv ertisin Si n to t e P annin April 13, 1987 Commission. a eve oper s a prepare and submit a complete sign application fora proposed construction sign to be located on the site. The Agency shat'. deliver the sign application to the Planning Department for scheduling on the first ova ila6le Planni^.g commission Agenda for their review and approval. _3_ • 4. Submission Off-Site fm rovement Not later than Plans. Redeye open shall prepare May 30, 1990. a~bmit its off-site improve- ment plans to the Agency. 5. A royal Off-Site Im rovement Within 60 days after P ans. The gency s a approve receipt by the Agency. or disapprove the off-site improvement plans. 6. Submission-Preliminar Buildin Not later than and Lan sca n Pans for eve o - June 30, 1990. ment Review. The Redeye oper sha prepare and submit to the Agency the Preliminary Building and Landscaping Plans. 7. Oevelo ent Review A royal- Within 60 days after re m nar Bu n and and- receipt by the Agency. sca~g Pans. a gency s all approve or disapprove the Pre- liminary Construction Orawi ngs and Landscaping Plan. 0. Submission-Final Buildin and Not later than La nds ca in Pans. The Re e- December 1, 1990. • ve oper sha prepare and submit to the Agency Final Building and Landscaping Plans. 0 annm val_Linal Ruiidinn and Within aS da.m aif or L~a nd sca inn P ans. The Agency receipt by the Agency. s a aph 11 prove or disapprove the Final Building and Landscaping Plans. NOTE: All drawings and plans can be submitted and approved in increments as they are submitted as long as each increment 1s con- sistent with all other increments. 9A. Finance Plan. Redeveloper shall submit to gency a description, in general terms, of its plans for flnanc ng construction of improve- ments to he constructed on the Site. The financing plan shall not require the execution of loan documents or definite proposals on terms of lender financing. July 15, 1990. -4- • `J n 98 A enc Tax Allocation Bond Issue No. 2. Pursuant to Section 5. Agreement, the City shall issue its Lax allocation bonds or obtain other funds as set forth in the Financing Plan (Ex ht bit "D"). 10. Off-Site Im rovements. The Agency sia advance to Re eveloper the funds to commence construction of the off-site work referred to in .,cr. ~_. ccpa . Oevelopmentu(Exhibit "E"). -5- Not later than August 15, 1990. Agency shall issue Tax Allocation Bond Issue No. 2 in an amount suf- ficient to enable Agency to pay the balance of the purchase price for Site Parcel A (i.e., 52,250,000), plus provide proceeds for the off-site improvements, as described in Section IV of Ez hibit "E". Agency shall pay the balance of the purchase price (52,250,000) within 5 days of (a) the pulling of a grading perniit or (b) receipt by the Agency of the proceeds of Taz Allocation Bond Issue No. 2, whichever is later: Within 45 days of the completion of Issue No. 2, upon either the execu- tion of a construction iJa,i oylceuicut uy noue- veloper respecting the [mprovements or the pulling of a building permit to commence construction. Funds for Off-Site work described in Subsection IV.A.1 of Exhibit "E" shall be advanced to Redeveloper as follows: (a) 1/3 at execution of contract tc construct the off-sites; (b) 1/3 at 50% completion, as certified to by Redeveloper; and (c) 1/3 upon substantial completion as certified to by Redeveloper. Funds for reimbursement of expenses described in Subsection IV.A.2. shall be paid u,,on submission of invoices. • • • 11. Commencement of Constructfon e edeve oper s a commence construction of the improve- ments referred to in Section II of the Scope of Development (Exhibit "E') to be performed by the Redeveloper with respect to the development of the Site. 12. Com letion of Construction. e le eve oper spa comp ete the construction of all of its improvements to be developed on the Site. 13. Certificate of Construction. e gency s a ssue to t o Redeveloper the Certificate of Completion referred to in Section 5.19 of the Agreement. Not later than March 1, 1991 (the "Construction Date"). Not later than Nay 15, 1992 (the "Completion Date"). Upon substantial com- pletion of all of Redeveloper's improve- ments to be developed on the Site. -6- TG WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: THIS LETTEk IS IN kEGAFDES ':~(7 THE HEALTH AND SAFE T'/ CF OUP' AFER. 7HE G1ILDkEN HAVE NO SIDEWALh;S UN WHICH TO WALP+: TO AND FFOM SCHOOL. THIS IS VEF Y' DANGEFCUS AS WE HR'JE A LCT OF SPEEDING ON OUk STFEET. RT THE t_g5T CCUNC I! MEETING IT Wq5 STATED THRT 7HE TFAFFIC GN OUF. 5TFEET WRS F'F'ORAELY FkOM THE kE5IDENTS IN OUF RF'E A. IN TALl.ING WITH THE POLICE OFFICERS THEY TOLD US THRT THEY EVEN USE" GUF' STFEEi AS A THGUGHFAF:E TO R'iCID USING GFO'dE. RT ONE OF GUk NEIGHBCF'HOCD WAi'CH MEET IPIGS 7HE POLICE OFFICEF. 'TOLD US THAT WE NEED TO HAVE STkEET LIGHTS TO HELP WITH THE CFIME IN OUP' AF;EA. WE AFE PL50 STARTING TO E.kFER7ENCE GANG kELP. T'ED f°FOELEMS CN SAUNA. WE HAVE T'WG HANDICAF'ED F'ECF'LE ON 7HE SOUTH HALF OF SIEFRA MRDF'E EETWEEN RRkOW AND 9TH. CN MANY OCCASIONS THE UNE IN T',-IF.. WHEE-LCHAiF HAS COME NEAk TO GETTING HIT FFOM THE 5F F_ED I?JG CAF;S UN IHt ST F'ECT. iF WE FiAD SiDEWALk'~'S THIS WGULD ALIVJPTE 'HIS F'FCBLEM. eir. nor. r. vr.rn .,_.m:..":C ...,~. ~ - ~~ 1 i- ._n ~rto :N :'HE 4RE:, ~': SIEF'kP MRDfiE, SAI_It.R, VL'.IM^F. PiJp CALAVEFAS. SFECIFJ[:ll.',.~ ..UF GL. AF•Ic ~. I~, lJE dF'=' '~,'QF't ING ~i EFY ViAf ~ o C;f•O UF' T.. ~: -;'~I Ilr ''HI°' 4FEF, ArJli MAh r. IT A SRFEF PLPCEC °.; ^'~IF; CrI:L GF'Efd 'T ('. GFGW UP IN NUT 14 e: ~;EEIi ~I HL {u, ~_F ,, r;U'F CI7`/. `h{F F'p_SJIi F.IJ TS !'F EIE:'FA MAGLf-. '.PLI hiA, ~; IfI;9A"r. TC WHOM Ii' MAY CONCERN: THIS '3 THE LET T, Ek THAT THE MA'~DR FiEL7~UE5TED FF;OM THE LAST COUNCIL MEETING gbOUT THE CPTME I'N OUFS AREA. IN THE LA57 9 MONTHS THEF;E HAS 6EEN THREE BUFGLARIES ^N SALiNA, FOUF EUFGLAkIES ON '/ItJMAF: AtJD Six Ord EIERFA MADRE. THERE HAS @EFN TWO HIT ntr'D RI!fd5 AND ^aIEFF'q MADfiE WITHIN THE LAST THREE MONTHS. SOME Gi= THE CHiLORENB P?4,'F, ~,'a vE Grcpi Sci_t~J FkOM THE FRONTS VFRDS RT NTGHT. THERE WAS AN ATTEMPTED Gf-;AfJD 'HEFT AUTO At.D ~OFCED GATE: OFEN ON SIERRA MADFE THE CHILDREN CANNOT GC OUT A':'fJIGHT E"ECAUSE OF ALL THE F'kOELEMS iN GUF' AF'EA. THERE OUR LIGHTS GN SIEFF'A MADF'E NORTH OF AKFGW. THERE AF'E ALSO LIGHTS ON THE NCkTEI HALF OF SIERRA 19ADRE EETWEEN ARF'OW RND 9TH ANC THERE I5 NO CGNGFEGATION OF F'EDFLE THERE AS THREE IS ON THE UNLIT HALF OF SIERRA MADFE. THERE L°. ALSO OiJE LIGHT SOUTH OF SIEF'RA MRDF'E JN 9TH. ?h .ID _~JT S. ~.. ~~•h~H MADF:E, SRL.INA. VINMAR AfJD CAL_A'dEF;AS ve , ~>~: ~~t~ W~eelem Propenle' ^0"""~+noN 1156Noi6MwmwAww'/PA.1x670/llplsd,0Jlmh917!/71490971 APR 1B }~7 April I5, 1987 HAND DELIVERY City Council Ci iy of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Base Lin! Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Subject: Environmental Rssessment and Terra Vista Planned Community Amendment 86-02 Dear Councilmember ax After extensive study, we have decided that it is in the besi interests of all concerned to modify the captioned amendment so that it will closely recembl~ the form suggested by the planning division staff. Therefore, and in accordance with the advice w! hav! received from the city attorney through th! planning division staff, we hereby withdraw the request which is now bef or! you. We will submit a new request, containing all the appropriate revisions, in the near future. Sincerely, WESTERN PROPERTIES i John R. Melcher L.Vice President/Project Development JRM:cjc/d1 y738O cc: Brad Buller, City Planner i .1 m .. i ~~'~ t : ~ t, ,~ . , ~~.~~. ~> \l. ~' Y ,t . :~ .~„ j~~.-_~~, 1~, ~ _ ~ µ< ~ v u`,, ,~;+ V~\//