The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1987/10/07 - Agenda PacketPAGE City Cowcil Agenda City Cowcil Agenda October 7, 1987 1 October 7, 1987 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda moat be in rriting. Tba deadline for eubnittiag these items is 5:00 ervice Agtea•ent (CO p. a. on the Wednesday prior to the seating. The City Corporetioa Yetd aC Clerk's Office receives ell such items. ea 1e almau Arcb itecte of of $118,410 ($107,645 vnded from Capital A. GLL TO OADBit it oa 9-16-87. 1. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. reement Sxteneion for cared in the Victoris 2. Aoll Cmll: Brorn _ Huquet _. Stout ~ T 16e Willis Lyon and Wright Ring _. 20 B. ANNONNCBMBNIS/PR&SBNTATIONS NCIL OP 1N6 CIT4 1NIA, APPRWING 1. Presentation of Proclsmatioa declaring October 18-24. LTBNSION AND 1987, as National Bnsinns Wemen'^ Week. ~' 13058, 13059, 2. Presentation of proclYStion to Jerri Rarney for her ouvtendiag contributions to the City of Rancho C1tCYOngI. ~B a Ccty CAIIDCII .987 for m appeal of 3. Prnemtatioa of Procl Yatioo decl azing tba month oP Ins relating to October u Toutmutev WYUnicstions Month. ieuu•iva Irscc ro. t C. CON9BNT GLE1B)AR . :1 The Follor iag Consent Cal eadar items era expected to be routine sad non-contrwereial. 'fiey rill be acted upon by IC1L OP TNB CITY the Council st ono tLe rithout discussion. Aoy itY esy IIA, APPROPING A be zswed by a Councilmmber or ember of the audience for T MAP. NDNBRR diecsaaion. ~OT RBS IDSNTIAL LAND IN TRS LOW 1. Approval of Minot es: August 19, 1987 OGTBD ON TR8 September 2, 1987 VHNU6 A181 TRYON ALIPCIRNIA, AND 2. Approval of Wacrmte, Register No'a. 9/16/87, 9/23/87 1 ERHOP end 9/30/87 Yd Psptoll ending 9/3/87 esd 9/17/87 for ~ ~ ~ ~ the total Yowt of $1,553,119.73. ~d at the acr rheas[ Hose Line Road, 3. Apprwsl to receive and file current Investment 14 I• Schedule as of 3eptmber 30, 1987. 4. Alcoholic Beverage Applicstion for On Sale general 20 Bering Place, 8qui's. Nmcy A Jeck Wu, 10006 Poothill Blvd. *4 ,} N. ~..:f City Cowcil Agenda October 7, 1987 PAGE 23. Apprwsl to ezecute sgresmt For Installative of 94 Yu61 is Ivprwseat and Dedication (OD 87-154) betrem August H. Raitar, III and the City of Reecho Cncuvege for Street Prvetage Ivprwasant• at 9744 Arrw Route, RffiOLOTIOR N0. 87-532 95 A RffiOLDITON OP THE CIT4 COONCCL OP 1118 QTY OF RANIXO WG1oN0A. CALIPORNLI, ACCCQPfItT, AN AGRHBMBNT POR INSTALLATION OP POBLIC IMPRWEMBNT AND DEDI GTION PROM AOGDST R. RBITER, III AND AUSHORIZINS TRS INYOR AND CIT4 CLBRY TO SIGN SAIQ; 24. Approval to ezecate Profuaional 8arvicea Agre~mt (CO 96 87-148) baAem the City of Rancho Lbcuaoga and L. D. Ring, Inc., to prepare Topographical Damp 9utvey Service for the Iaprwtmt of Via (Yrrillo Drive fray Meoida Vejes to Eut of 9lerra Madre Avenue (+ 1500 ft.). the aasiv:~ foe is $2,600.00 rod the project le under CDBG Pending. 25. Approval to relwe cash Mpoait in the nowt oE: $2,500 to Pul to Nava Corporative for taaporary aalea 100 trailer for Tract 13022. $500 to Rancho Verde Village Ltd, fw eubdivitive ^ip, 101 Tract 12091. $2,500 for Cr iaaar Devtl opvmt Corporative for 102 teapovaq wlea office, Tract 9440. S1,000 for oo-aite •ubdiviaive sips, $2,500 for 1D3 teapveaty wlee office, and $500 for a trap fence to the Deez Creek Cwpe~ for Trent 12801-1. 26. Approval to accept Ivprwe.ents, Release of Bonds And Notice of Cavpletive fw: Tract 12726 -located betaean Bear (teak Avenue and 104 ' ' ' ' ' Saddleback Place. Release: Peithful Perfotvance Bond (Street) $68,255.00 C City Council Agenda October 7, 1987 PAGE 27. Approval of Article 8 QeL Transportation Pu¢da for 110 Fiscal Year 1986-1987. 28. Approval to authorize the transfer of funds frw fiord 115 09 (GU Tar 2107) to Ford ZI (Gas Taz 2106). 29. Approval of encwbre¢ces frw P4 86-87 and appropriate 116 the f~mda to the ecco,mt as outliaed in the rapor[. 30. Approval to hire one par~tiae Ad.inistrative Intern se 132 support scarf for Oonu¢ity Pou¢dation end City business in a¢ nowt nos to euead $5,000 for P4 87-88. 31. Approval of contract (W 87-133) betraa¢ the City of 133 Ra¢cho Qicaaoaga a¢d Btiranda School District tar joist use of facil itin a¢d anthoris• the Naar to sign upon approval bf the Btiranda School District. 32. Approval of th• Conceptual Dsvelopaa¢t Plans for nro 143 wighboshood parb to b• located rithin the Victoria Devdopa¢t as raewnandad by the Park and Racraatiw Cesv.issiw a¢d Pl mai¢g Cooiasiw. 33. Approval [o accept th• Victoria Groves Park Proj set in "' ' ^ 146 .._ __a:ia ___ Cr~uuil~ w curpiacr and auehorisa the Diractor~of Cauwity Services to Pile • Notice of Cwpletio¢. 34. Approval to arard Professional Services Ag[s~ent (CO 147 87-156) rith Purkies-Rop Associates of Fullerton, (hliforaia to develop rorki¢g dzar ing for conatraction of West Beryl Park espandon. Tha base contract is $29.450.00 and a IOS coutiugeney totals S32,395.00. 35. Approval of contract (W 87-157) for Cor~wity 150 Deval opaa¢t Block Grant sdainistratiw services rith Micheal flrandaa¢ Assoelates in the aao~me of $24,410.00 i i for the 1987-88 CDBG program year. nr r ~~ PAGE City Council Agenda October 7, 1987 36. Approval of Paergemy Memgueni Aaeietence Sigmture 158 Reaol cation as regnised by State Office of ~ergeney Service to facil itete Rucho Cuceaongn'e regmet to participate in Funding Aseiataace progra. RffiOLUTION N0. 87-536 150 A RffiOLOTION Of TR& CIT4 COUNCIL OP T88 CITY OP RANCHO QIGIDNGA, CALIFORNIA, NAlQNG INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE HSRBBY AUTRORIZED TO BEEQITH POR AND IN HHIALP OP RANQiO W GtoNGM A PUBLIC ENTITY BSTABLISNSD UNDBA TRB LAWS OP THB STATE OP CALIFORNIA, APPLIGTIUNS AND DO4IlOSN13 FOR 171E PfIRPOSB OP OBTAINING PINANQAL ASSLSTANCB UNDER TRB FEDERAL CIPII, DEFENSE ACT OP 1930, AS AMENDED, (PUBLIC LAW 920, 81ST WNGRffiS, 30 USC APP, 2251-2297) 37. Approval of contract for rensal of Code Enforcuent 161 Repreaenerativa. 38. Set public boring for October 21, 1987 for the Bese 168 Line Rwd Widening Bmiromeatal fueeeatent Rwier, (Hellun Avenue to Archibald Avuue). 'fie proj ecu liw: r. •~ ~~~ ^ --- ui~ nail Luau 1racYu y Eeet of Hellun Avuue to Archibald Avenue. RffiOLOTION NO. 87-537 169 A Rffi OLOTION OP TNB CIT4 WONCIL OP TN8 CIT4 OP RANOIO g1CAlONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND SBTTING A PUBLIC HHARIH. DATE OP WEONffiDAY, OCTOBER 21, 1987 POR THE BASE LINS RAOD WIDBNIIA BtNIRONMBNTAL ASSffiSFDINT RSVIBW 39. Set public hearing for Oc[ober 21, 1987 far the Arror 111 Route Phase I Enviromantal Aeaeaueat Rev iar, (Archibald Avenue to Turner (Heraou) Avenue). the proj ecte limits are the North aide of Arrov Route troy , , , , Ar eh ibald Avenue to Turner (Hermosa) Avenue. RffiOLUTION NO. 87-538 172 A RffiOLUTION OP THE CITY NUNCIL OF THE QTY OP RANC80 QI GIONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND SETTING A PUBLIC NBARIM. DATE OF WEDNESDAY, OCfOBBR 21, 1987 POR THB ARROW ROUTE PHASE I EN9IRONMBNTAL ASSffiSFB:NT RHVIHN ~~ PAGE City Council Agenda October 7, 1987 30 40. Set public horsing for Nwsber 4, 1987 - Approval to 174 Avnez Parcel Map 1OS84, located oa the Narthwat corner of Bsaa Line Rwd and Ai~Libald Avenue to Street Lighting Maintananca District No. 6 w Annasytion No. 5. RffiOLDTION N0. 87-539 175 A RffiOLOTION OP TIi6 QTY WDNGQ. OP THE QTY OP RANOlO QICAlDIAA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPRWAL OP CITE BNGINBBR'3 REPORT POR ANNEFATION N0. 5 10 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANOS DISTRICT N0. 6 RBSOLDTION ND. 87-540 181 A RffiOLOTION OP THE CITE OOONCIL OP THE C[TY OP RANCHO WGAMDIAA. CALIFORNIA DEQ.ARZNi IT8 INTEIITfON lb ORDER THE ANNQATION TO STREET LIORTSN6 MAINTRIANOS DISTRICT N0. 6, AN ASSffiSMNNI' DISSRIQs D68ICNAT2lA SAID ANRESATION A8 ANRBATION N0. 5 1D 9TRF3T LIGHTING MAINTAIANW DIBTRIC! NO. 6{ PORSOANT TO 1EE LANDS CAPITA AtD) LIGHTING ACY OP 1972 AND OPL'BRIIA A TIME AND PLACE R/A HEARING vo~ew•ausm snaxsiu 41. Sat public horsing for Novwbar 4, 1987 -Approval to 183 Anew Tract Not. 13512-1, 13475, and 10414 To Strwt Lighting Mainiewaca District No. 2 o Anaeutioa No. 23. RffiOLOTION N0. 57-541 187 A RffiOLDTION OP 77IE CITI CDUNC3L OP 1EE CITY OP RANQ10 WCAIDNGA, CALIFORNIA. OP PRELIMINARY APPROPAL OP CDTI ENGIN88R'S REPORT OP ANNffiATION N0. 23 10 STREET i i LIGHTING MAINTENANOI DISTRICD NO. 2 PAGE City Council Agenda October 7, 1987 11 RffiOLUTION N0. 87-542 195 A Rffi OLUTION OP THH QTY WONCIL OF THB QTY OP RANCf10 OJGMDNGM GLIPORNIA D6¢ARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER TNB ANN6RATION TO STRBET LIGHTING MAINT6HAN(8 DISTRICT NO. 2, AN ASSffiSM6NT DISTRICT: DES IGNATING SAID ANNBIATION A4 ANNESATION N0. 23 10 STRBBT LIGHTING MAIN77UTANG DI5IRICT N0. 2; PURSUANT 10 THB LANDS GPI2& AND LIGHTING ACS OP 1972 AND OPPBRING A TIME AND PLA(8 POR HEARING OBJECTIONS TABRETD 42. Set pool is boring for Nw®Mr 4, 1987 - Approval to 197 Annex Tract Noe. 13542-1, 13475, 13353, 10414 and Parcel tLp 10864 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 u Annexation No. 32. RESOLUTION N0. 87-549 198 A RffiOLOTION OP 171E CITY ODONCIL OP TRS QTY OP RANdiO COCAIDNGA, GLIHORNIA, OP PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OP CITY BNGINEER'S REPORT POR ANNRATION ND. 32 TO STREET LIGHTING NAINTBNANCE DISTRILT N0. 1 RffiW.OTION N0. 87-544 ""' A ABSOLUTION OF TIi6 CLTY COUNCIL OP THB QTY OP RANCHO QICAMONGA, CALIFORNIA D8¢ARING ZTS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEYATION 10 STRBBT LIGHTING NAINTENAN(E DISTRICT N0. 1. AN ASSffiSMENT DISTRICT: DBS IGNATING SAID ANNBEATION AS ANNRATION N0. 32 TD STREET LIGHTING MAINTHNANCE DISTRICT N0. 1; PURSUANT TO TAB LANDS GPING AND LIGHTING ACT OP 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE POR HEARING OBJECTIONS THBRSTO 1 i 43. Set public hearing for November 4, 1987 - Approval to 210 Annez DR 86-21 (Indue[rial Cnmaercial Area) to ~ Landscape Mainteunce District No. 3 as Anna:ation No. 7. RffiOLUTION N0. 57-545 211 A RffiOLOTION OP 1716 CITY WUNCIL OP THS QTY OP AAN010 QICII0NGA, GLIPORNIA, OP PRELIMINARY APPRWAL OP CITY BNGINEffit'S REPORT TOR ANN®fATION NO. 7 TO LANDS GP6 F ~u r•, _\s~ t,t PAGE City Council Agenda October 7, 1987 12 RffiOLIITION N0. $7-546 A RffiOLOTION OP T1i8 CITY WONCIL OP TRH QTY OP RANCRO Q1GlpNGA. GLIPORNIA DHdARING ITS INTRITION TO ORDHR 1718 ANNeSATION TO LANDS GPA MAINTSNANB DISTRICT N0. 3, AN ASSffiS1RNT DISTRICT: D83IGNATIIZ; SAID ANNHEAATION A4 ANNSiATION ND. 7 TO LANDB GPB MAINTBNAliCB DISTRICT N0. 3; PORSOANT TO TA8 LANDS GPING AND LIGHTING ACT OP 1972 AND OPP~tING A TI1D1 AND PLACB POA REARING OBJECTIONS TNmt810 44. Set publ is boring for November 4. 1987 -Approval to Anaaz Tract Noa. 13542-1, 13475. 13353 wd 10414 to Landscape Naintamanee District No. 1 u Amnaution No. 38. RffiOLOTION N0. 87-547 A RffiOLDTION 0! TRH G[T! COONCII. Ot TRB QTY OP RANCAO C9CAlO1SA. GLIFOANIA, OY PRELINZNARS APRiWAL OP CITY 6ig;INEBR'8 REPORT FOR ANNBLITION NO. 38 TO LANDS GPH MAINTffi7ANCg DISTRICP N0. 1 RffiOLOTION N0. 87-S b8 A RBSOL0ITON OP 1N8 CIT4 CODNC[I. OP TRH QTY OP RANWO 41CANDNCA, GLIFORNIA DEdARING ITS INT811TION 1D ORDHA THE ANN67ATION TO LANDS GPS NAINTBNANCE DISTRICT N0. 1, AN ASSffiSlBtNT DISTRICT: D89IGNATIM; SAID ANNHYATION AS ANNBEATION NO. 38 TO LANDS GPg MAINTR7ANCB DISTRICT N0. 1; PURSDANT TO TN8 LANDS GPING AND LIGHTING ACL' OP 1972 AND OPPHRINC A TIlDI AND PLACE TOR HEARING OBJHCTIONS 771ERi E1O D. ODNSHNT OADINANCI'S 14:e follas ing Ordinances bave bed public heariaga at the time of first reading. Second resdimge are a:pected to be routine end nos-comtrweraial. They rill M stied upon by the Co:mcil at one time vithout diecuasion. 1be City Clerk will teed the title. Aay its cao be rowed for diecuaeion. 217 219 220 228 ~~ t PACe City Comcil Agenda October 7, 1987 13 1. SNVIROMIRNPAL ASSESSMENT AND 6TI17A181A SPSQPIC PLAN AMENIMSNT 87-02 - QTY OF RANCHO COGAMONGA - M aaeadsept to rawe fza~ the 8tirmda Specific Plm approziaataly 57 acres of lmd on th• north Bide of Foothill Boal evard betreen the I-15 Praeray and Best Avenue; approzisutely 5 acres of lmd on the southeast corner of Btirmda Aveave and Foothill Boulevard; sad approzisately 14 aetea of lmd on the southrest corner of East Avmne sad Foothill Boulevard - APH 227-211-24, 25 and 27, AFN 227-221-0i-03, 07-09, 14 and 22-27, APN 227-231-19, 21, 28, 29, 33 and 34, APN 229-311-14 and 15, APN Z29-0µ-01, end portions oP APN 227-231-16 and 23. ORDINANB N0, 320 (ucmd reading) 230 AN ORDINAN~ OP THE QT! ODONCIL OP THE QTY OP RANWO OIICAIDNOA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVItF+ E1'SBANDA 9PEQBIC PLAN (E. S. P.) AM6ND10SNT 87-02 REQUESTING LAND ON TR6 N0E19 SIDE OP P001HII.L HODLHVARD SSTfiBM THE I-IS PREBUAT AlID EAHT AVBNUH, 'IDE S00TREAHT WRNmt OF POOTEII.L BOULEVARD AMD ETIWAIIDA AVEtRIE, AND TBB SOOTHMBBT OOR118R 08 POOTEII.L BOULEVARD AND BAST AVENOH BE DELBT® PROM THE E, S. P. .. :iiwii+naTiw iwusiuiunZ ,uYU liruuv i'a1aL DY6DLtll: PLAN ^• AMBHIIMEIVf H7-01 - QTY OF RANCHO C9CAMONCA - M eaandsmt to rrwa frw the Indnetriel Specific pim epprozisately 80 acres of lmd on the south side of Pooth ill Boulevard batram th• I-15 Frearay and Htirmda Avmm - APN 229-031-01. 16 and 20 and postims of 229-021-57 end 59. ORDINANCE N0. 321 (second reading) 232 AN ORDINANB OP THE QTY OOBNQL OP TH6 QTY OP RAN WO WCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APAtOVIlG INDUSTRIAL AREA SPEQPIC PLAN (I. S. P.) AMENDMENT 87-01 REQUESTING LAND ON TRB SOOTd SIDS OP FOOTHILL BOULEVARD 88'1TiSffi7 TH6 I-35 i ~ ~ ~ ~ PRESIAY AND ETINANDA AVBNUB 8E DBLSTED FROM i THS I.S.P. ~~% ~~ ~ ~)~ PAGE City Cowcil Agenda October 7, 1987 14 3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSBHSMBNT AND VICTORIA CD!lfONITY PLAN AMBNOMHNS H7-01 - NiLLIAM LYON COMPANY - A rgosat to mend the Victoria Caumity Ylm tart to reduce the aiataat tquired lot depth m 3,000 quare foot lots frc~ 75 feat to 60 fpt, to reduce the ~iniav rgairad lot depth m 4,000 passe foot lots Frc~ 80 feat to 70 feet, ud to rgnira a oiM~uf tsn (10) foot frmt yard setback for the living arum 3,000 and 4,000 quare foot loco. ORDINANCE N0. 322 (second ruding) 234 AN ORDINANCH OP 1NE CTYY WONCIL OP THE CITE OP RANWO WCAIDIR.A. CALSPORMIA, ADOPTllii VICTORIA CDIMIIRTP PLAN ANElMT6NT g7-01, SO MODIPI 1ER WIlORiTr PLAN TERT TO RRDDOR 'IDR MINIlRIM LOr DEPTH DA 9,000 BQUNtE P00! LOD3 PROM 75 FEET 10 60 PEST, TU REOOW '~E MTNINDN LOT DEPTH ON 4.000 SQUARE POOS LO'S PROM 80 PEST TO 70 lEET, AND TO REgOIRR A MINIIOM rmr (la> Poor rRONr YARD sssseox POR 19E LIVING AREA ON 3,000 AND 4,000 SQIIARE FOOT LO'S. 8. ADVBRTISHD PUBLIC HHARINGS The folloring itua have been adveztiud and/or posted u public huringa as squired b7 lar. The fair rill open the resting eo receive public taatinony. 1. SNVIRONlOINTAL AS364SNBNT AND DBVEI.OPMBNT DISTRICT 236 AMENDMENP g7-09 - CITY OP HANCHD COCANDNGA - M uandamt to cbmga the Dtvaloprent DLtzict deaigeatima frw the eilating dedgnatiooa to Yoothill Bout avazd Specific Plm (P. S. P.) foz all progrtiu adjacent to Foothill Boulevard fra Grove Avmw to Deer Creek enamel and fror the I-15 Praerey to Heat ~ Avenue rithin the Pooth ill Soul evard Specific Plm ' ' ' azu. PAGE City Comcil Agenda October 7, 1987 IS ORDINANCE N0. 323 (first reading) 242 AN ORDINANCE OP TEE RANWO OICAMONGA QTY WVNCA, APPROPIlL• DHVELOPMEMT DISTRICT ANENDIRNT NO. 87-09, A RS)O~T TO AMEND TH8 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP PROM TEE ffiSTItG "CC° (GIDISiW. WNMSHC[AL), "OP" (OPPi CE/PROFESSIONAL), "M^ (MEDIIIM DBNBITY RHS IDSNiTAL), ^!C" (lLOOD ODNiROL), "ISP^ (INDDSTRLAL ABBA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND 'B4Y" (ETTNANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMElIDlRNT) TO "PS P" (POOIDILL B08LEVARD SPECLliC PLAN) POA 560 ACRES 0! LAIN/ (SEE E~IEIT ^A") ADJA~RT 10 POOTt[ILL BODLEVARD BE1NEmt CROV6 APENOE ARD DEER QEER (BANIiEI. AND EETFEEN TAE I-15 lREfiAT AND EAST AVENGE MINIM 1NE POOINII.L HODLEVAlD SPECIFIC PLAN. 2. OPF8IT6 SDEDIVISION DIREClIOINL SIGIB - An ueadaant 245 to Sectim 14.20.063 of the Raxho Cnca~aaga Mmicipd Coda pasuiaing to off-aiu aubdiviaim directional aigoa rithia plaawd carmitin. ORDINANW N0. 309-A 253 AN ORDINANCE 0! TN6 CITY WORCIL OE TEE C[T! OP RANOHO WCAIDNGA, CALIPORIiIA, AlQiNDINL' TITLE 14 0! TH6 RAN®0 QICAMDIi.A MOIIICIPAL WDB PBRTAININ. 10 SIGNS 3. BNVIRONMENTAL AS8638MBNT AND VICTORIA ODMNUNITY PLAN 255 AMHNDMENP 87-02 - NILLIAN LYON Od@ANY - A regneat to chavg~ the load wa and :owing Maigwtiona fray IMdiu. (4-14 drilling miu par acre) and Ibdi~a-Eig6 (4-g drilling mite per acre) fora 24.67 acre pared riffiin the 9lctoria Flamed Coumity, lacatad at the nor threat corner of Victoria Part Lane and Milliken i i Avenue - APN 202-211-13 end 14. (~~~} [~ PAGE ~ e ~ ~ City Cowcil Agenda • • y $ October 7, 1987 16 RffiOLDTION N0. 87-549 276 A RffiOLOTION OP TH8 QTY WUNCIL OP TRS QTY OF RANCHO COCAlDNGA. CALIFORNIA, DBNYIN'. ' VICTORIA ODMMONITY PLAN AMBNDMBNT N0. 87-02, R~UffiTING A C8ANG8 IN TN8 LAND OS8 DffiIGNATIONS FROM McDION (¢14 DWBLLING UNITS PER AQt6) AND MBDIOM-NIGg (1¢24 iF18t.LItT. UNITS PBR ACRE) RBS IDBNTIAL TO LOW-MEDIUM Rffi IDBNTIAL (¢8 RiSLL1IT. OMITS PER AQtB) FOR A 24.67 AQtB PARCBL WITHIN TIIE VICTORIA PLANNED COMl10N1TY, LOGTBD AT THS NORTEWffiT WRI83RR OF VICTORIA PARR LANs AND MILLIIC6H AVHNO6 - APN: 202-211-13 4. ORDBRI NG TH6 NORR IN WNNECTION WITH: A. AN!>QiATION ND. 6 POR DR 87-01. iAGT® AT 11288 277 ARApi ROUTS, TO LANDSGPE MAINTENANCE DIBTRICT N0. 3. 278 RffiOLUTION NO. 87-550 A RffiOLOTION OP TR6 CITY CDUNCLL OP TItB QTY OP RANCHO CUCAMDNGA ORDERING 141E WORE IN WNNECTION WITE ANNBEATION N0. 6 10 LANDS GPB NAINTR7ANG DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACGPTIHG TAE FINAL BNGIH60t'S REPORT FOR DR 87-01 8. ANNBEATION N0. 31 POR DR 87-01 iAGTBD AT 11288 284 ARROW ROUTE TD STRBST LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTAIGT N0. 1 AND A[OffiEATION N0. 4 TO STREET ' LIGNTIN(i MAINTBNAN(S DISTRICT tA. 285 RESOLUTION N0. 87-551 A Rffi OLUTION OP 111E CITY ODUNCLL OP THB QTY OP RANalO WGMSNGA ORDERING 1HE WORR IN OJNNBCTION WITH ANNBEATION N0. 31 TO STREET L ICHTING NAINTEMANfE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND ~ AC~PTIiG THE FINAL BNGINEIDI'S REPORT POR DR r i ~ 87-01 291 i RffiOLUTION NO. 87-552 A RE60LOTION OF TH6 QTY COUNCIL OP THE QTY OP RAN010 CU GlONOM ORDSRItI, THE WORK iN CONNECTION WITH AHNB7IATION N0. 410 STREET LICHTIIIG MAINIBNANC$ DISTRI(E' N0. 6 AND ACCEPTING 1H6 FINAL ffiCINEPR'S REPORT FOR DR ~` PAGE City (bwcil Agenda October 7, 1987 17 P. PUBLIC FIBARINGS 'fie folloring itae have no legal publ icaeioa or posting requiraenta. 7b• (Lair rill open the meeting to receive public teatinoay. 1. APPEAL OP STAHH DECISION TO RBNOY6 TH8 M®IAN ISLAID IN THE 9200 BIAQC OP MONPB VISTA. (Its continued from Septaber 16, 1937 meeting. 2. AMBNDlDiNT TO S8Q'ION 10 OP TNB NUIUCIPAL CODE 97 302 BSTAELISAING SP88D LIMITS PRO TERRA VISTA PARRpAY, B/1S8 LINE ROAD. TORN AVENGE. ARCEIHALD AVENUE AND (EUR(E STREET. ORDINANCE N0. 324 (first reading) 303 AN ORDINANCE OP THE QTY (IRINCIL OP THE QTY OP RANCICO QICAMDNGA, CALIHORNIA, AMENDING SSCfION 10.20.020 OP TAB RANWO (1/CI~lDNGA MUNI (BPAL WDE RETARDING PRAM PACIB SPEED LI14TS UPON CERTAIN CITY STREETS G. CIT4 MANAGER'S STAPP RBPORT9 The follor ing itaa do not legally require any public teatlmony, nl though the finir may open the meeting for public input. 1. USB OP (X)NDHMNATION TO OBTAIN OPP-SITE BASBMSNTS POR 306 TENTATIVE TRACE N0. 13850 - GRBENPIHN SSTATBS - A etnff request for City Council direction concerning the use of possible condonation proceedings eo obtain an off-site drnimga eaaemeni necaaNLy Eor the development of proposed Tentative Trsci No. 13650 i located at Eh• Beath neat corner of Pooth ill Boulevard I and Baker Avenue (APN 207-201-30, 41, 42, cad 43). ~iti ~~ ~~ PAGE City Cn,mcil Agenda October 7, 1987 18 H. COUNCIL BUSINHSS The follor ing itsa hivn been requested by the Citq Cowcil for dimcuasiom. 7Ley are not public hearing ite•e, although ttre mair mey open the aeeiing for public input. None Subeitted. I. IDBNfIFIGTION OP ITBMS POR NBYT MBBTING This is the time for City Comncil to iden[ify the itra they rimb to diacuaa as the nest mee[ing. Theme item rill not ba discussed at this meeting, only identified for th• aert meeting. J. mMIRINIGTI0N8 PROM THB PUBLIC This i^ the time and pl ace far the general pnbl is to sddrua she City Co~mcil. Stan lr prohibits the GYty ~ Council from addrsesing a~ issue not previonaly included on the Agenda. the City fbmcil mmy receire testiao~ and set the ntur fot a subsequent ueting. ComuaL are to ~ be limited to five ^inutas per individual. R. ADJOURNMENT I, Beverly A, Authalet, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucmonga, hereby certify that a trw, ucurtta copy of the foregoing agenda ru posted on October 2, 1987, seventy-tro (72) hours prior to the meeting per A. B. 2674 et 9320-C i i Bees Line Road. i rYl August 19, 1987 QTY OP RANQ10 W CAlD1&A CITY COONCIL MINDTBS Regular Meeting A. GLL Sb WDBR A regular meeting of the City Wuncil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Wednesday, August 19, 1987, in the Lions Park Community Centex, 9161 Bnee Line Road, Rancho Cucmonga. the meeting res celled to order at 7:32 p. a, by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present sere Councilmembere: Deborah N. Brwn, Q:arl ea J. Buquet II, Jeffrey King, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; City Cl ezk, Beverly A. Authel et; City Attorney, James Merluan; City Plainer, Brad Bullez; Deputy City Pl saner, Otto Kroutil: City Engineer, Rweell Maguire. Absent were Councilmabera: Pamela J. Nrigh t. * x • ~ it + D. MDOIN~IRIPIE/PREELR[ATIOIB Hl. Presentation by Jin Proet Pram the 10th Mmiveraery Celebration Committee. Mt. Frost stated that theq viahed the City's support in the follw ing four areas: 1. City endorsement of a Birth day Party. 2. Staff aesietence in preparing a multi-media presentation. 3. Support for s brief mitten documentary of the City. 4. Participation by say Council member. Mayor Stout stated this sae a City wen[ end felt Council should suppot[ it. 8e fait the items req ue eted were reasonable and needed to be formally requested by coming back on the agenda for epprwal. Regarding the request for someone to parti.c ipete, he wanted to be the person to help coordinate th ie activity. • t • • + C. m16EET CALE3011t Ml.**** Co one it man King req ueeted item number 19 be removed for discussion. Items 31 through 34 sere also removed to be discussed after the hearing on the Pooth ill Specific Plan. •~f~k* City Council Minutes August 19, 1987 Page 2 C1. Apprwal of minutes: June 15, 1967, June 17, 1987 (Xing b Wrigbt absent). C2. Apprwal of Warrants, Register No'e 6/5/87 and 8/12/87 and Payroll ending 7/23/87 and 8/6/87 for the total amount of $1,503,273.49. C3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sele General Eating Place, Pino Enotece Rietorente, Harriette S. Herebon, 10013 E. Eth St., Ste ^D", C4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale General, Joe's Market b Liquor, Chong Suk 6 Jwg Ja Xim, 9124 Pooth ill Blvd. (5. Alcohol it Beverage Application for On Sale General, Club Nigh Brow, Hibroweki, Inc., Thaddeus Lacb, President and Clara Lach, Secretary/Treasurer, 10134 Pooth ill Blvd. Cb. Alcoholic Beverage Application for OfF Sale Beer S Wine, C 6 8 Ital ien Deli S Grill, Bonnie L. 6 d:arl ea E. Hnllmark, 8661 Base Line. C7. Apprwal of requeet by the Ten Year Anniversary Committee end Priende o£ the Library Group to u[il ize the City Logo on a "Happy Tenth Birtbday Rancho Cucamonga" informational brochure. B. Apprwal to transfer french iee agreement with Scott Cable Commtmica ti one, Inc. to Simmons Communications, Inc. providing cable tel ev ieion services within a non-eacl usive franchise arse of Rancho Cucamonga. RffiOLUTION NO. 87-415 A RESOLllTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE QTY OF RANCHO CU CMtON:A, CAL IPORNIA, APPROVING THE TRANSFER OP A CABLE TELEVISION RYS TEM TO SIMPDNS WMMUNI CATIONS, INC. C9. Apprwal to sac ute Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Q/P 85-12 located an the north aide of Q:urch Street, east of Archibald Avenue, submitted by the Engl ieh Cucamonga Congregation of Jehovah's Witneeaee. RESOLUTION N0. 87-416 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE QTY OF RANCHO CU CA1pNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT PGREEMBNT AND IMPROVEMENT SEQIRITY FOR Q1P 85-12 C10, An pr,rv sl of Map a, arse ution of Tm nr ny em not Agreement end Imprnement Security for Tracts 12671-1, -2, -3 end -4 located on the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Mountain View Drive, submit ied by Lea ie Hamee of California. RESOLUTION N0. 87-417 A RffiOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMJNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMPNT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMPNT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OP TRACT NO. 12671-1, -2, -3 ANA -4 City Council Minutes August 19, 1987 Page 3 Cll. Approval of Mape, execution of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for 'h~act 12650-3 located on the east Bide of Haven Avenue, north of Wilson Avenue, submitted by Tk~e Deer Creek Company. RESOLUTION N0. 87-blfi A RES OLUTZON OP THE CITY ODUNCIL OP THE QTY OP RANCHO CUCAlpNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT PGRE@4!NT, IMPROVBMBNT SEWRITY, AND FINAL HAP OF TRACE NO. 12650-3 C12. Approval to ezcute Imprw®ent Agreement end Improvement Security for DR 86-26 (Phase II) located between Arror Highray amd Jersey Houlward end betreen Utica Avenue and Vineent Street, submitted by Martin Jaeka, Incorporated. RF55 OLUTION N0. 87-419 A RESOLUTION OF TRH CITY COUNCIL OF THH QTY OP RANCHO CICAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPRWING IMPROVE2UiNT AGAH&ffiNT AND IMPROVPJffiNT SBa1RITY POR DEVffi,OPMENT REV IHW N0. 66-26 (PHASE II) C13. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and file Notice of Completion for: Traci 12320-1 end Tract 12320 - located on the southeeet corner of Archibald Avenue end Victoria Street. Faithful Performenee Bond (Street) - $ 87,700 RESOLUTION N0. 67-420 A RESOLUTION OF TH& CITY COUNCIL OF THE QTY OP RANQt0 gICAlpht;A, CALIFORNIA, AC(2:PTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACE 12320-1 AND TRACI 12320 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OP A NOTIQ OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Parcel Map 9687 - located an the nor [beast corner of Santa Anita and 4th Street. Faithful Pezf os manse Bond (Street) - $ 22,500 AES OLUTION N0. 67-421 A RFS OLUTION OF TMh CITY OOUNCIL OP THE QTY OP RANCHO CU CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROV&fEN1H FOR PARCEL MAY 96 E7 AND AUTHORIZING 1HE FILING OP OP A NOTICE OF COMPLETION POR THE WORK city Council Niaut ea August 19. 1987 Page 4 Tract 12523 -located on the north aide of Lemon Avenue east of Atch ibald Avenue. Maintenance Guarantee Hond (Street) - $ 45,590 Tract Noa. 11663, 12019 through 12023 and 12026 - located between Archibald Avenue and Remom Avenue, south of Q:urch Street. Faithful Performance Bond (Street): Tract No. 12026 - $ 15,000 Tract No. 11663 - $ 11,000 Tract No. 12019 - $112,300 RESOLUTION NO. 87-422 A RESOLUTION OP TN8 QTY ODUNQL OP THE QTY OP RANCHO W CAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, AClBPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROPHNENTS FOR TRACE HOE. 11663, 12019 THROUGH 12023 AND 12026; CHURCH STREET INPROVffiaNTS IN WNNECfZON WITH TAACf 11663; TRACE N0. 12019 AND AUTHOAI2IRG TH6 FILING OF A NOTICE OP COMPLETION FOR THH WORR Tract 11797 - located on the east aide of Archibald Avenue, north of Base Line Roed. Mainte:mnce Cash Bond (Streets and Storm Orein) - $ 16,800 Tract 12237 - locateL et the North City Limits, east aide cf Hermosa Avenue. Release: Fai thfvl Pezf ormance Hond (Street) - $144,000 Accept: Haintenence Guarantee Bond (Street) - $ 14,400 RESOLUTION N0. 67-423 A RESOLUTION OF THE QTY WUNQL OF THE CITY OF RANCNU CU CAMUNGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPRWEMENTS POR TRACt 12237 AND AUINORIZING THE FILIlIi OF A NOTICE OP CAMP:.RTinN FnR THR WORK Tract 12237-2 - located at the North City Limits, east aide of Hermosa Avenue. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) - $lta ,000 Accept: Me intenance Guarantee Bond {Street) - $ 14,700 City Cowcil Niautee August 19, 1967 Page 5 RffiOLUTION NO. 87-424 A RffiOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANat0 Q]CAMO1&A, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING '-tE PUBLIC INPR098t~NT5 FOR TRACE 12297-2 AND AUTHORIZING TEE FILIIT OP A NOTI(E OF ODMPLETION FOR THE NORR C14. Apprwal of Parcel Nap 10696 bounded by Civic Center Drive, Nhite Oek and Aed Oek Streets, submitted by Rancho Cucamonga Business Perk 6quitiee, A Cal iforaie General Partnership. RESOLUTION NO. 87-425 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TRR QTY OE RANCHO QICAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVLNG PAR (EL NAP NUMBHR 10696 (TENTATNB PARCEL NAP NUMBffit 10696) C35, Apprwai to accept and ezecute a Real Property Improvement Contrnct and Lien Agreement (CO 87-118) and approval of Parcel Hap 10444 located et the southwest corner of Pooth ill Boulevard and Spruce Avenue, submitted bq Rancho Cucamonga Business Park Equities, a Cal ifornin General Paztnezeh ip. RffiOLUTION NO. 87-426 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP TY.E QTY OF RANQIO Q1CAlgNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPR09IDC PARCEL MAP NO. 10444 (TENTATNE PAR (EL MAP N0. 10444) RffiOLUTION N0. 87-427 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CICANONGA, GIL IPORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPRWEt~NT NNTRACT AND LIEN ?GREEt~NT F120M RANCHO CU CAMDNGA HllSINESS PARK EQll2TIES, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, FOR PAR QrI. MAP 10444 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CL ERE TO SIGN THE SANE C16. Approval to award the "Archibald Avenue Realignment from 19th Street to NiYJ~l and Avenue with Improvement on Highland Avenue^ Yroj act to Laird Construction, Incorporated foT the amount of 5271,300.00. C17. Approval to award the North Twn Perk Design/ Engineering contract (~ 87-119) to Purkiss Roae Aseoci et ea in the amevnt of $24,500.00. CIS. Appr<rv al to authorize placement of croe sing guard on Sepph ire Street between Hillside Road and Banyan Street. C19. Approval of Professi onel Serviee Agreement (CO 87-120) with Sh anaon end Aesociai ea for a Deputy City Engineer search not to sac eed $9,500.00. OWNCILiMN RING RBQUHSTRD IT®1 NU10IDl 19 BB RRDV&1 TOR DISWSSION. City Council Minutes August 19, 1987 Pegs 6 C20. Approval of a Proclamation of the City Cowcil commending the 20th Anniversary of the A1{JA-AGC Joint Committee Standard specifications fw public works construction. C21. Approval and execution of Renewal Agreement (CO 87-121) with South Bay Sweeping CompaTy of Gezdena for the sweeping of designated paved, curbed streets from July through Gctober 1987, for the sum of $1,869.00 per month. C22. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement end Impzwenent Security for DR 86-13 located on the north aide of Ninth Street, east of Vineyard Avenue, submitted by Messenger Iweetment Company. RESOLUTION N0. 87-428 A RFS OLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE QTY OP RANCHO QICAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEt~NT AGREEMENT AND IHPROVEMENT SEOIRITY FOR DR 86-13 C23. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bida^ for the Area VII Storn Drain/Main Line Improvement Proj act. RESOLUTION NO. 87-429 A RES OLllTION OP THE CITY WIINCIL OF THE QTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPCIRNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPEGI PI CATIONS FOA THE "ARP.A VII STORM DRAIN/MAIN LINE", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECPING THE CITY CL6RR TO ADVERTISE TO RECENE BIDS C24. Approval io authorize the advertising of the ^Notice Inviting Bids^ for the Haven Avenue Medians, Phase II Improvement Project from Fourth Street to Arrow Route. RESOLUTION N0. 87-430 A RESOLUTION OF THE QTY NUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAN LHO CU CAIKJNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIES CATIONS FOR THE ^HAVF.N AVENUE MEDIANS, YNASE II^, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CJ.HiK TO ADVERTISE TO RECENE HIDS C25. Approval to execute Agreement far Installation of Public Improvement and nndi oari nn (m A7-122) between Fred D. Nicks, Le urfl B. Hicks and Fredrick Nicker and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Stree[ Frontage Improvements at 9814 Arrow Route. RESOLUTION N0. 87-431 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO QI CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN PGREEl1ENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVffi~NT AND DEDICATION FROM FRED D. HICRS, LAURA B. HI CRS AND PREDRIQC HIQCS, AND A11'IEIORIZING THB MAYOR AND CITY Q,ERK TO SIGN SANE City Cowcil Ninmea Aaguet 19, 1987 Page 7 C26. Approval of the &rvironmental Initial Study Yarts I end II for the proposed Ramona Avenue Iaprw®ente Hetweea Victoria and 19th Streets and approval of the attached Reaol ution and issuance of a Categorical ~mption therefor. RESOLUTION N0. 87-432 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE QTY OF RANCHO CUGHONGA, GLIFORNIA, APPROPING THE fitNIIlONNHNTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OP A GTEGORI GL EEENPfION POR THE PROPOSED RAMONA AVHN06 IHPRWffi~ffiNTS BETNE6N VICTORIA AND 191N STRH675 C27. Approval of Contract Change Order No. 2 (W 86-029) with L.D. Ring, Inc. for design rev isiona and uhenges for the Baker Avenue sad Arrow Route Storm Drain Project, the original Agreement man dated April 3, 1986. C28. Approval to euthorite receipt of request of proposal for Proteeeionel Design Services fo develop construction drawings foz the Devel opaent of Wesf Beryl Park 8tpaneion by Comm®ity Services Department. C29. Approval of an Agrement (00 87-124) for Cooperation between the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, end the Gaffey Joint U¢ion High School District. G30. Set public hearing for Septnber 2, 1987 - Ew ironme¢tal Aeeee®ent and Tentative Tract 13476 - Williams Property Coneulte¢is -Appeal of the Planning Commieadon'c decision requiring the preaerve[ioa of sainting Nagnol in tree, the undergrounding of e:ieting overhead aril tries, and the construction of finish floor elwetiona along Hellman Avenue one foot above the 100 year flood level for a residential trecT auhdivieion of 37 single family Iota on 9.7 acres of lend in the Lw Density Reeiden[isl District (2-4 dwelling unite per acre). located et the nor [beset corner of Hellmn Avenue and Ttyon Street - APN 208-1 ].1-0 4. C31. Set public hearing for September 2, 1987 - Enviromental impacT report For the Pooth ill Boulevard Specific Plan and General P1 en Amendment No. 87-03B - To review and aoneidar a recommendation for certification of the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Foothill Specific Plan and General Yl en AmendmenT 87-03H Project. The Specific Plen consists of detailed land use regulations and standards for the development along Pooth ill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and Haven Avenue, between the I-15 Freeway and Eeet Avenue. IT'IDI RHN10V6D FOR DISCUSSION APT '196 HBAAING ON '196 F009i1LL SP6CIliC ?LAN. City Council Ninut ea August 19, 1967 Page 8 q2. Set public hearing for September 2, 1987 - Em ironmentel Assessment and Etiwenda Specific Plan Mendment 87-02 - City of Rancho Cucamonga - M amendment to remove from the Etiwande Specific Plan approzimetely 57 acres of lend on the north aide of Foothill Boulevard between the I-15 Freewaq and Bast Avenue; approzimately 5 acres of land on the southeast corner of Etiwenda Avenue and Pooth ill Boulevard; and approzimetely 14 acres of. land oa the southwest corner of East Avenue and Foothill Houl ward - APN 227-211-24„ 25 and 27, APN 227-221-01-03, 07-09, 14 and 22-27, APN 227-231-19, 21, 28, 29, 33 and 34, APN 229-311-14 snd 15, APN 229-041-01, and portions of APN 227-231-16 and 23. IZ811 E140P® RIIR DIS WESION AFS'mt ffi ~ARIEO ON 7E6 Rp>BILL SPEQYIC PLAIT. q3. Set public hearing For September 2, 1967 - Environmental Meesament and Industrial Specific P1m Amendment 87-01 - City of Rancho LUCamonga - M amendment to remove from the Industrial Specific Plan epprozimately 80 acres of 17nd on the south aide of Foothill Boulevard between the I-15 Freeway end Etiweada Avenue - APN 229-031-01, 16 and 20 and pottione of 229-021-57 and 59. ISSN EENDFBD !~ DISOHSSIOE AFfAt 18E BEAEIEG 011 7E6 POOTHILY. SPECIFIC PLN. q 4. Set public hearing for September 2, 1987 - Emironmenial Msesment and General Fl en Mendment 87-03B - City of Rancho Cucamonga - A req neat to amend the Lend Use Map of the General P1 en to reflect land use changes proposed by the Fooffi ill soul evard Specific Plan. I'fA6 EElDP® YOR DISL98SIW AFt'E11 !EE BARING ON 1ffi P0019ILL SPECIFIC PLAN. q5. Set public hearing fox September 16, 1987 - Approval to Mnez Parcel Map 9504, located on the nor theaat corner of Baee Line and Haven Avente (Terra Vista) to Street Liah tin¢ Haintenence District No. 4 ae Mne:ation No. 6. RES(R.UTION N0. 87-433 A RES OL'dTION OF THE QTY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO (ll (AMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPRWAL OP CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 6 TO STREET LIG HTIFG MAINTENANCE DIS TRI Cf NO. 4 RE90LliTI0N N0. 87-434 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RAN(NO C17 CAMDNGA, (Ai,IFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DIS TRI Cf N0. 4. AN ASS FS SMd;NT DISTRI Cf: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS AN"E:LITICN NC. 6 TO STP.EET LIG NTING !'AINTENAN(E DIS TRI Cf NO. 4; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACf OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIMR AND PLACE FOR HEARING OH.TELTIONS TN ERETO C16. Set public hearing for September 16, 1987 - Approval to "ones Parcel Map 9504, located on the northeast corner of Beee Line and Haven Avenue (Terra Vista) to Londe cape Maintenance Dietr ict No. 4 ae Mnexeti on No. 6. City Co+mcil Ninute~ Auguat 19, 1987 Page 9 R850LUTION NO. 87-435 A RESOLUTION OP THE QTY COUNCIL OF THE QTY OF RANCHO OICAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRffi.IMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEBR'S REPORT FOR ANNERATION N0. 6 TO LANDS GIPS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 RffiOLUTION NO. 87-436 A AffiOLUTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANQIO CU CAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANq DISTRICT N0. 4, AN ASSffiSMBNT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 6 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4; PURSUANT TO 17TH LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OP 1972 AND OFFERING A TINE AND PLACE P0R NEARING OESHCTIONS TN1IltST0 q7. Set public hearing for September 16, 1987 -Approval to Annez Tract Noe. 12fi71-1, 12671-2, 12671-3 end 12671-4 (Terre 9'iete) to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 ae Mnezation No. 7. RffiOLUTION NO. 87-437 A Rffi OLUTION OF THR QTY COUNCIL OP THE QTY OP RANCHO CV CA7UNCA, CALIFORNIA. OP PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OP GZTY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 7 TO STRBRT LIGHTING MAINTBNANCe DISTRICF NO. 4 RESOLUTION NO. B7-438 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE QTY OF RANOiO CUGAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THR ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENAN~ DISTRICT N0. 4, AN AiSBSSMENT DISTRICT: DES IGNATIIC SAID ANNERATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 7 TO STRHHT LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4; PURSUANT TO THB LANDS CAPIt~ AND LIGHTING ACf OP 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR NEARING OB,iECTIONS THERETO q8. Set public hearing for September 16, 1987 -Approval to Annax Tract No. 12914 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 es Mnezetion Ne. 29 end ^u tteeT Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 es Annexation 22. RESOLUTION N0. 87-439 A RESOLUTION OF THE QTY WUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OP PRELIMINARY APPRWAL OP CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT POR ANNEXATION N0. 29 TO STREET LIPUTING MAINTENANCE DI3TRI CP N0, i City Council Minutes August 19, 1987 Page 10 RESOLUTION N0. 87-440 A RPS OLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH8 QTY OF RANCHO CUCAMDIT,A, GV.IFORNIA, DE Q,ARING ITS INTENTION 10 ORDER THE ANNEXATION 1U STREHT LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICP NO. 1, AN ASSESSMeNT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANN67tATSON AS ANNERATION N0. 29 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENAN~ DISTRICT N0. 1; PURSUANT 7'0 1HE LANDS :APING AND LIGHTING ACT OP 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO RESOLUTION N0. 87-441 A RFS OLUTION OF THE CLTY COUNCIL OF THE QTY OF RANCHO CU CANOIi;A, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OP CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 22 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 87-442 A RESOLUTION OF THH CITY WUNCIL OP THE QTY OF RAN(NO 41 CAMOICA, CALIFORNIA, DEQ,ARLlG ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION 1b STR68T LIGHTING MAINTBfiAN(E DISTRICP NO. 2, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 22 TO BTREET LIGHTING MAINTBNANCE DIS1RI Cf N0. 2: PURSUANT 1Y1 THE LANDS GAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLAN FOR NEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO ©9. Set public hearing for September 16, 1987 - Approval io Annex Parcel Map 10696, DR 87-02, DR 86-OS (Parcel Mep 10444) DR 85-52 end OR 85-48 to Street Lighting Maintermnce District No. 6 ea Annexation No. 3. RESOLUTION N0. 87-443 A RESOLUTION OF' THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OR RANCHO CU CAFbNGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT POR ANNEXATION N0. 3 TU STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 RESOLUTION N0. 87-444 P. P.E~OLUTION OF THR CTT'Y OOU NCJL OF THE QTY OF RANa10 Q7 CAMONGA, CALIFURNIA, DE Q.ARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TU STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRI Cf N0. 6, AN ASSPSSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNERATION N0. 3 T'0 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DIS TRICL N0. 6; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACI' OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIt~ AND PLAT: POR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO City Council Minutes August 19, 1987 Page 11 C40. Set public hearing for September 16, 1987 -Approval to annex Parcel Map 10696, Tract 12671-1 through -4, DR 87-02, DR 86-05 (Parcel Nap 10444) DR 85-52, DR 85-48 and Tract No. 12650-3 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 ee Anneaafion No. 30. Rffi OLUTION N0. 87-445 A Rffi OLUTION OP THE QTY (Y)UNQL OF THE QTY OF RANCHO (U CAM3NGA, CALIFORNIA, OP PRELIMINARY APPRWAL OP CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT POR ANNEXATION N0. 30 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 RESOLUTION N0. 87-446 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY ODUNQL OF THE QTY OP RANCHO (ACAMONGA, GV,IFORNIA, DEQ,ARINC ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANN88ATION TO STREET LIGHTINC: MAINTENAN(8 DIS TRI(T N0. 1, AN ASSffiSt~NT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNHXATION AS ANNHXATION N0. 30 10 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE OISTRILT N0. 1; PURSUANT 1Y1 TNH LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OP 1972 AND OFFERING A TINE AND PLACE POR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO C41. Set public hearing £or September 16, 1987 -Approval to annez Tract No. 12650-3 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 sa Annezatioa Nc. 21. Rffi OLUTION N0. 67-447 A RESOLUTION OP THE QTY COUNCIL OP THE QTY OP RANCHO CUGIMDNGA, GLIFORNIA, OP PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OP CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 21 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENAN~ UIS TRICE NO. 2 Rffi OLUTION 110. 87-448 A Rffi OLUTION OF TH6 QTY (X)UNQL OF THE QTY OE RANCHO (U C.AEANGA, CALIFORNIA, DE(I.ARIMG ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 21 1V STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2; PURSllANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECT IONS TNRR R'In C42. Set public hearing for September 16, 1987 -Approval to annea Parcel Map No. 10696, DR 87-02, DR 86-OS (Parcel Map 10444) DR 85-52 and DR 85-48 to ?.ands cape Maintenance District No, 3 ae Annexation No, 5. RffiOLUTION N0. 87-449 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY (Y)UNQL OF THE QTY OF RANCHO (UCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OP PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CSTY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 5 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANIE DISTRICT N0. 3 City Council Minutes August 19. 1987 Page 12 RESOLUTION N0. 87-450 A ABSOLUTION OP THE CITY OOUNCIL OF THE QTY OF RANQIO QICANDNGA, GLIPORNIA, DE Q.ARING ITS INTENTION TC ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANLN GPE MAINTBNAN(8 DISTRICT N0. 3, AN ASSffiSMENT DISTRICT: DSS IGNATING SAID ANNHXATION AS ANI~XATION N0. 5 TO LAND6 GPE MAINTENANLE DISTRICT N0. 3; PURSUANT 1'0 THE LANDS GPTNG AND LIGHTING ACI OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIl~ AN- PLACE FJR NEARING OBJECTIONS THHRETO C43. Set public bearing for September 16, 1987 -Approval to ennez Tract Noe. 12650-3 and 11549-1 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 ae Mneaation No. 37. A1.50LUTZON NO. 87-451 A AESOLUTION OF THH QTY COllNCLL OP THE QTY OF RANQtO QICAMONGA, GLIFDRNIA, OF PRHLIMINARY APPROVAL OP CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FDR ANNEXATION NO. 37 1D LANDS GPE MAINTHNANG DISTRICT NO. 1 ABSOLUTION N0. 87-452 A ABSOLUTION OF THE QTY COU NQL OF TH6 QTY OF RANCHO CU GMDNGA, GLIIbRHIA, DE Q.ARING ITS INTENTION 1'O OADBR THE ANNERATION 1I1 LANDS GPB MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1, AN ASSESSlENT DISTRICT: DBS IGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNHXATION N0. 37 TO LANDS GPB MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUANT TO THH LANDS GPING AND LIGHTING ACf OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TI1~ AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERSI'0 C44. Set public hearing for September 16, 1987 -Approval to snnea Tract Nos. 12671-I, 12671-2, 12671-3 end 12671-4 (Terre Vista) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 as Mnexation No. 7. RESOLUTION N0. 87-453 A RESOLUTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANC10 QIGMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OP CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 7 TO LANDS GPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 RF$OLIITION Nn, 87-454 A HES OLllTION OF THE CITY (bUNGIL OF THE QTY OF RANd10 CI CANDNGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION 1'O ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDS GPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4, AN ASS FSSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 7 TO LANDS GPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4; PURSUANT TO THE LANDS GPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND D N'FERING A TI[~ AND PLACE FOR NEARING OBJECTIONS 1HERE1'0 City Cowcil Minutes August 19, 1987 Page 13 •fatee MOTION: Moved by Ring, seconded by Buquet to approve the bel once of the Consent Calendar minus items 19, 31 through 34. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Wright absent). xrite AexAA* DISCUSSION C19. Approval of Professional Service Agreement (CO 87-120) with Shannon and Associates for a Deputy City Engineer search not to exceed $9,500.00. Councilmen King eteted that since the last meeting, he had changed hie wind and did not concur with this. NOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by erwn to approve item 19. Motion carried 3-1^1 (King - No, Wright absent). w++~~• • * * ~ e D. OD1B61R OmIAAIAC~ City Qerk, Authelet, reed the title of Ordinance No. 317. D1. - wne>awrervoa ex varroum eecriena wr urv ra no Cowty Uniform Ew iromentel Henl th Code. ORDINANCE N0. 317 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE QTY COUNQL OP THH QTY OF RANWO QI CAMDNGA, GLIFORNIA, AI~NDIN: THE RANCHO QICAMONGA MUNIQ PAL OJDE BY T718 ADDITION OF A NBW CBAPTHR 8.20 TO TZTLE 8 1NEREOP AND ADOPTING, RY REPERBN(P„ ORDINANCE N0. 3105 OP THE NU N1R OP SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING DIVISIONS 1 THROUGH 6 OP TITLE 3 AND RESTATING VARIOUS REOULATORY PROVISIONS OF THE NllNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRON!ffiNTAL HEALTH SSRV I CES COVERING: POOD, DAIRIES, WATER, 1IIRI 6, WASTffi, VECTORS, HOUSING, RECREATION, AND OTHIDt Sll(R 6NV IRONMENTAL NSALIH RHGULATORY SUBJECTS, WITH QRTAIN At~NDMENTS, ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND EALT:PTIONS, INCLUDING FEES AND PENALTIES MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Huq uet to waive foil reading end adopt Ordinance Nc, 317. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Wright absent). City Cowcil Minutaa August 19, 1987 Page ib x x - x : x E, ADP~SIS® PUDLIC BEARINGS El svnn rna~n iv Saxaar inrnovarusEr rnwacr - Rwiev wauabu ity of twos ens approve reprogrmming of fwde to North Tao Fheee I9 Street Improvement project. Staff report presented bq Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner. Neyor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. there being no response, the public hearing vas cl oaed. RESOLUTION N0. 87-455 A RESOLUTION OP TNH CITY COUNCIL OF TNH QTY OP RANCHO W CAMDNGA, CALIFORNIM RHPROGRAMMING $53,735 IN UNSPeNT COlMfMTI DEVELOPMHNT HLOQ( GRANT (CDSG~ FUND6 FROM TN6 1984-85 AND 1985-86 PROGRAM YHARS 1U CDMPLET6 THB NOR1R TWN PHASE IV STRBHT INPROpffi@NT PRQIHCT MOTION: Moved by Kicg, seconded by Brwn to approve Reeol ut ion No. 87-455. Notion carried 4-0-1 (Bright absent). x x x +. x x E2. COlMUMTY DEVELOPMENT BLOQI GRAM' 1986-87 GRAM'EB PeRPORNANCE REPORT - Reviev of Block Grant Program Performance during fiscal year 1966-87 end approval of T.'.~e Gzantee Perf ormanre Report for submission to the U. S. Department of Housing end Urban Development by August 31, 1967. Staff report presented by Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing vea closed. RPS OLUTION N0. 87-456 A RES GLUTTON OF THE GITY COUNCIL OF THE QTY OF RAN410 CU CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THB COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOIX GRANT 1986-87 GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY Q.ERK TO SIGN SAME AND DIRECTING TRAT THE REPORT HE SUBMITTED TO THE U, S. DE PARTI~@NT OF HOUSING AND UREAN DP.VFtOPMENT MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Buq uet to continue the public hearing to September 16, 1987. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Bright absent). City Cotmcil Ninntea August 19, 1987 Page 15 x • ~ ~ ~ E3 . iTA Pf.ANNBD CORN 67-02 - IiSSTERN PROPIDlTIES/LBNIS HOMES -The request to amend Tesra Vista Planned Community bq eeiabl ishiag a Business Park Overlay Zone for Areea designated ae Office Pazk rithin the Planned Community boundary. Stnff report presented by Otto Rroutil, Deputy City Planner. Mr. Kroutil, Deputy City Planner, stated there were baeical ly three positions: 1. Approve ae recommended by Levis Hamea. 2. Approve es recommended bq the Planning Commission. 3. Derry. Mayor Stout opemd the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council rare: Bohn Melcher, Lewis Hemee, requested approval es amended based on the on¢ parcel; or at least refer it back to the Planning Comission for further study. Tb ey rare hoping that :he Office Profeeeional area rith the blue line around it be changed, they rare eeking for approval of the Office Profeaeioml Parcel bebem Tao Center end Church Streets, There being no further comente from the public, Nnyw Stout closed the public hearing. Co~mcilman King stated 6e had no problem with the area [het vas basically outlined in the blue line pert of the werlry business diexrict. Councilman Buq uet stated he did not have any pzobl em with the req ueeted change. Councilwoman Brwn also concurred. Mayor Stout stated he did have reservations about this ahen it first vent to the Pl ginning Commission. Now, based on whet has been presented, he concurred with the other Counc it members. RffiOLUTION N0. 87-457 A RffiOLUTiON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMDM,A, 6V.IFT7RNIA, APPROFIhG TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMU NITT AMENDME:iT N0. 87-02. AMENDING THE WMMINITY PLAN TEXT BY ESTABLISHING A HUSINffiS PARK OVERLAY ZONE FOR AREA DF.S LG NATP.D Ag OFFICE PARK D'IS TRI Cf SOOTH OP TOWN BNTRR DRIVE, WEST OF SPRU (I: AVENUE MOTION: Moved by Stout, eeconded by Buq uet to approve Reeol ution No, 87-437 and io emend Exhibit "H" to allow the business overlay, Motion carried 40-1 (Wright abeent). City Council Minutes August 19, 1987 Page 16 * * * • * fi E4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIPE TRACE 13541 - ALLNARR - Appeal of the Planning Commission's decision apprw ing the development of a 12 lot e ubdiv is ion on 4.3 acres of land in the Les Reeidentiel District (2-4 duvet ling unite per acre), located north of Red Hill County CL ub Drive at Sierra Vista - APN 207-411-10, 201-080-01 and 48. The applicant has al eo filed a Tree Remwel Permit. Staff report presented by Scott Murphy, Associate Pl saner. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were: Mr. Def rase, 8500 Red Hill, who stated that the basic problem wee the 60 foot road would cut into their residential area. Mr. Neguire, City Engineer, stated what pas being proposed nw xould be a 36 fool curb-to-curb road. 'Ae teat of the area xould be deeigaa red a parkway. Hr. Defreee stated that ihet would be okay sl though he did not see any need for sidewalks in that area. Michele Lindley, 8479 Camino Sir, representing the neighbors to the north of the pzopofled proj ec[, stated they did not object in any way to the devel opmemi of the lore. They did object to the street being opened to ffirough traffic for the follw iag reasons: 1) the through street would double traffic, a her erd in the abrupt nor: wring of the street on the 36 foot xidth to the 20 foot width of their street; 2) be a hazard at the 90 dear ee turn on Sierra Vista to Camino Sir if ii rare open to through traffic. The nee ghbore in the area felt the City had already set e precedent by cl owing the street to through treff is several years ago at the far north end of Sierra Vista with afire road end a gate. Tfiey al eo felt the aesth erica of the proposed two streets meeting have not been ceref ally thought out. the two neighborhoods xould not be consistent with one another (the size of the streets and appearance of th_ streets). They felt that, ass th eticelly, it would be better to have the two neighborhoods separated in some xey with either a cal-de-sac or same other method in order to keep their wan identities. They felt the people oho travel on Red Hill, usually try to find alternate rout ee during peek hours in order to avoid the traffic at Alta Cue sta. They felt many dr iv ere would take sh or tc uta through their street [o go north on Aed Hill Country Gl ub Drive on Valley Vista. Tn ey were also concerned if the street does go through, and it is found [o be a ptobl®, the City might come in to attract it by widening their existing ett sets. 7h ey would then lone a tremendous amount of landscaping, valuable trees, fences, retaining xal le end dr ivewflys. 7fi ey did not xish to see their homes destroyed in such away and did not w ieh to loose the rural end quiet feeling of their neighborhood. She seated they were asking the Council to carefully consider this met ter and suggect a reasonable alternative which might present ear ioue future consceq uences. Toary Miez representing the applicant, Allmark, Inc., 10070 Arrow Route. req ueeted that the appeal be denied end that they be allowed io proceed with their development. City Council Minutes August 19, 1987 Page 17 Being no fur ffier public response, Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. Cowcil men Buquet stated he did not see 12 lots presenting a major impact far traffic flan. He did see ii es a major impact if you had Sierra Vista connect all ffie way through to Red Nill Country Club Drive. He felt for the 12 lots we could address the ingress end egress through the northern portion of Sierra Vista possibly to Monte Vista Drive approach on the other end. Councilman Ring eteted hie preference ree that Sierra Vista not go through. Councilwoman Brain eteted she did not see a treneition from one neighborhood to the other since the people from Red Nill ranted to keep the area rural looking. She could no[ concur rith the requirement of sidewalks since this would not be consistent with the north e¢d. Mr. Maguire, City Bngineer, eteted the problem in th ie zone roe the code did not give them en option, but required 36 foot vide streets with eideralke. curbs, and gut tare. t1r. Herlmen, City Attorney, stated that Council should be swore there ie en Ordinance. If Cotmcil wished to make this change, then they could have to direct en amendment to the Ordinance. The Orditance dose have a paragraph of ezcepiiona, Cowcil would simply have to add this io the eueptions. Coune ilromen Hrorn eiated she could like [a see th ie rith 2 cul-de-sac's. Mayor Stout stated he believed that when the County dasi~ed the Red Hill area, they were very remise in all acing some of th see single access types of situations. He felt th ie wee dangerous, especially if the area et the top becomes blocked. Ne felt that public safety did cone firer and agreed aeeth sties end the rural lifesey le were impor tan[. But he felt there were other pays to deal pith these issues through design. Mr. Markman, Ctty Attorney, eteted th et perhaps the developer wanted to make e choice at Chia point. If Council sustains the appeal, Council would Gave to direct eteff to bring back a reeol ution decrying the tentative map. If the developer wanted to naive the time lines required in the map act, he could go back end redeflign th ie in order to save the life of this pectic ul er map, Richard Avant, Vice President of Allmerk, Inc., eteted he would waive the time line req uir®ent for the Council to ec[ and go hack to the Planning Commission. MOTION: Moved by Buq ue t. seconded by Brawn to refer th ie beck to the Planning Commission for a map rev iaion in accordance with the Council's diecueeio¢. Motion approved 3-1-1 (Stout - No, Wright - absent). e • • • ~ ~ •~c,a~• Mayor Stout celled a recess et 6:45 p. m. The meeting reconvened ei 9:05 p. m. with x11 members of the Council present. +R:i.~e City Cowcil Minutes August 19. 1987 Page 18 ::::: E5. ENVIRON!ffiNTAL ASSESSMENT Atm TENTATIVE TRACE 13063 - CITATION - Appeal of the Planning Commiaeioa's decieioa approving a total residential Bevel opnent of 74 single fmily lots on 32.6 acres of land in the Lw Residential District (2-4 duelling unite per acre) rithin The Etlrenda Specific Plan, located on the east aide of East Avenue at Catalpa - APN 227-071-07, 11 and 20. Associated with the proposal ie Tree Remwnl Permit 87-44 - A request to rmwe 270 Eucalypt ue Gl obul us (Blue Gm) [tees. Staff report presented by Scott Murphy, Associate Planaer. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were; Berry Litton, Citation Builders, stated an Arboriet found the trees to be in very poor condition. Ne felt their replacment progra rae consistent rith the Etiranda Specific Plan, end their tract net the req uirments of the City, particul arily, ae it xel ated to Bast Avenue and the access. Bob Cunninghm, Landscape Architect for Citation Buil derv, stated he ree not the Arboriei but, speaking for hin, the grwth on those trees rare sucker grwth. 7t;at vas the concern of the Arboriet. Jim Banks, appellant end resident of Victoria Avenue, rent over 5 issues l fated in hie letter to City Council. Jim Proat, Etirende resident, eapreseed that re could do slot better. He felt th ie development rae not good enough. Robert Watkins, Wetkine Aealty in Tuaiin, stated he had originally represented Mr. Oiu and Mr. Oran on this subdivision rhen they started the inception. through their Engineers, they did consult rith the schools on various issues such ae drainage. It was brought to their a[teniion et th ie time that th ie area had been, more or lees, a secondary crossing for kids coming out the back of the school th rossgh the athletic field, The school stated they did not ran[ any secondary eccees, and they relcomed something being put in there because [hey would have better can[rol of the kids. Mr. Cunninghm addressed Council again and vent over their tree rapt ecment progr m. There being ne fur that response from the public, Mayor Stout cl need the public hearing. Councilmen Buq uet and King both agreed rith Mr. Fzoet that [he development did not shw much cr eetiv ity for [he arse. Cn unc ilwoman Brwn also concurred that thate was not el of of creativity. She also felt eometh ing could be done with the wall. City Council Ninutec August 19, 1987 Page 19 Mayor Stout stated that ashen ve decided we wanted to make these corridors of vindroge, we bneicel ly set the pattern of What the development qa9 going to look like. When you make a boz, vhich is 330 feet by 660 Feet, there is no vey to hove slot of creativity, He also stated be did not like the Blue Gum Eucalyptus Trees used in residential areas since they did have a problem with branch drop and mere very dirty. Me fell ell the trees should be removed end replaced with a Spotted Gum Eucalyptus. He felt this tract baeical ly complied with the Etigenda Specific Plan; and if Council does not like the plea, then Co ~cil should change it. He voutd be in favor of derying the appeal pith same modif icetione: (11 He felt the block pall should ga back to the Planning Commission for them to make a determination as to what Chet well should look like and that some of the residents eh ould be iwolved in that pl sassing process. (2) Theta should be some tape of circulation, either some type of temporary in the form of esphel tic sidewalks or something that will lead from that tract down to the access of the school. IC should not go through the back. (3) In respect to the north/south streets, the decision was to make Eeat Avenue a 4 lane street, and it ie a precedent that ne should follan. 1t,erefore, he suggested that the appeal be denied with the two modif ice [ions ae he suggested; (1) regarding the design review process for the wall end, (2) that all the eucalypt uo trees be removed, Nr. Litton, Citation Builders, agreed to extend the time to September 2nd for Mr e. Wrigh t'e return from vacation. He oleo stated he would like to have the suggestions made by the Mayor take effect. MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Stout to approve the Lract on condition the S1 trees be retained subj act to further decision of the City Council that upon verif ice ti on of the condition of the trees they rill ¢ot pre6ent a dan¢eroue condition. Also approval of the wall be made by the Planning Commission end that Council adopt the Planning Commission findings in the Planning Commission's Reaol ut ion No. 87-112. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Wright absent). x x • t + a +waaxa Mayor Stout called a recess at 10:15 p. m. lt,e meeting recowened at 10:25 pm. with all members of the Council pr seen[. •~x~w~ ,t• ~ ~,t~ E6. FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN - Review of Planning Commission recce=ends ti un far edoptien of a epecit is plan regal sting development along the Foothill Boul everd corridor. Statf report presented by Otto Krout il, Deputy City Planner. SS idea were pr sae nted by Mr. Ven Stwene, Consul tent end Principal from Forme. Mayor Stout opened the meeting fur public hearing. Addreaein^ Council were: George Ade ir, who complimented staff for their work on the plan. After some discueai on by Council, it was decided that the meeting should be coasts ued toe workah op. City Comcil Ninu[ee August 19, 1987 Yege 20 MOTION: Nwed by Stout, seconded by Huque[ to continue the public hearing fo September 8, 1987, 7:00 p. m. in the Lion's Center for a workshop to discuss and review the Foothill Boul everd Specific Plan. Notion carried ¢O-1 (Wright absent). M0'1'IOM: Mined b7 Stont. seconded ~ Bogmei to cmtinae Cooaemt (ilmdar itmma 31 ihroagh 34 to Septsher 16, 1987 Comcil meeting. Motive carried 4~1 (Yright absent). * * * * * * E7. AREA VII STORM DRAIN - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. Staft report pr eeented by Blanc Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer. Mayoz Stout opened the meeting for public beexing. There being no reaponee. the public bearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 87-458 A RESOLUTION OF THH GITY COUNCIL OF THE QTY OF RANCHO Q7CAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROFSNG TH6 6NVAtON!ffiNTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A NHGATIVE DEQ.ARATION FOR THE PROPOSED AREA VII STORM DRAIN - NAINLINH MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Hrorn to approve Resolution No. 87-458, Motion carried ¢0-1 (Wright absent). • * * * * (* * Counn it combined items E8, E9 and E10 * *) E8. ORDERI DG THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 27 FOR MDR 87-05, DR 86-19 AND PARCEL MAP 10037 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRI LT N0. 1; and E9. ORDERING THE WORX ZN OONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 1 FOR MDR 87-05, DR 86-19 APE1 PARCEL MAP 10037 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6; end E10. ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0, k FOR MDR 87-05, DR 86-19 AND PARCEL MAP 10037 T'0 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3. Staff report on the above three items were pr eeented by Lauren M. Wae sermon, City Manager. May ~r S*~++t ape end the meeting for public hearing. There being no reaponee, the public hearing wee cl oeed, RESOLUTION N0. 87-459 A RFS OLUTION OP THE CITY COUNQL OP TH6 QTY of RAN(„0 CU CAITDGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDBRIFG THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION 27 TO STREET LIGHTIM, MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR DIDR. 87-05, DR 86-19 AND PAA(EL MAP 10037 City Council Minutes August 19, 1987 Page 21 RESOLDTION N0. 87-460 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY ODUNCIL OF TAH CIT4 OF RANQ10 QICAIDNGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN WNNBCTION WITH ANNEKATION 1 TO STRHRT LIGHTING MAINTENANQ DISTRICP N0. 6 AND AC~PTING 1tiE FINAL ENGINEER'S RHPORT FOA IIDR 87-05, DR 96-19 AND PAR QL MAP 10037 R850LUTIOp N0. 87-461 A RE9 OLllTION OF TNH QTY COUNCIL OF TNH CITY OF RANQtO CU CAlUNGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THH WORK IN ODNNECIION WITH ANNESATION N0. 4 TO LAIIDS CAPE MAINTENANQ DISTRICP N0. 3 AND ACCEPTING 1NE FINAL BNGINEHR'S RHPORT FOR 1R1R 87-05, DR 86-19 AND PARQI. MAP 10037 MOTION: Moved by Suquet, seconded by Ring [o approve Ream uH.,n Ne^. 87-459, 87-460 and 87-461. Moiion carried ¢0-1 (Wright absent). • t Y. POBLIC ~AQINC4+. ND ITEMS SUBMITTED • ~ ~ e ~ MANAG~'S SSAFP RBY(Nl'f8 Gl. STATUS REPORT ON INVESTIGATION OF VEHICLES PARKED AT 6006 KLUSMAN AVHNUE. Steft report presented by Richard Alcorn, Community Cade Representative. Mayor Stout stated he would prefer a type of Ordinance to preclude th ie from happening again. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing, Addressing Council rare: Nelson Stark, 6006 Klusman Avenue, the address where the vehicles ere l oceted. Mr. Stark stated he xae willing to work with the neighbere to mitigate th ie probi em, but it seemed lilts nothing eh ott of completely removing the vehicles would satisfy. ih uck Watson, 6011 Kluemar. Avenue, a neighbor access the street, stated he witnessed a car being tested and sold, Doug Maclndoe, 5911 Kluemen Avenue, stated this xes an eyesore end ranted something done about iC. ACLZON: City Council directed the City Attorney to work with Cade Enforcement to get the vehicl ee removed, City Cowcil Miwutes August 19, 1987 Page 22 R x x x x x G2. OVERpIEW OF CDST ALLOCATION STUDY - Mr. Wasserman requested a continuance. ACTION: Cotmtil concurred. Item vas raved to a future date. x x x ~ + x G3. RIGHT-OF-qAY ACQUISITION FOR THE AREA pII STGRM DRAIN. Staff report presented by Hlane Prandeea, Senior LYv it Engineer. RESOLUTION NO. 87-462 A RFS OLUTION OF THE CCTV COUNCIL OF TBS QTY OF RANQIO CAGMNGA, CALIFORNIA, STATING INTENT 1b AO'7UIItE REAL PROPERTY FOA THE AREA pII STOWi DRAIN BY EHIN&7T IIONAIN PROCEEDINGS SETTING TEE PUBLIC NEARING FOR SEPfH!®ER 2, 1987 NOTION: Homed by Stout, seconded by Buquet to epprwe Resolution No. 87-462. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Wright absent). x x x x x x G4 Haker Avenue and Arrow Route intersection in conjunction with the Baker Arror Storm Drain and Street Imprwaent Project. Staff report presented by Blane Prandsen, Senior Civil Engineer. ACTION: Council concurred that a taporary imprwaent be Constructed around the right-of-way restriction at the northwest corner of Baker and Arrw Route end go with an stoats domain action for the total frontage right-oF-pay when the next phase of Arrow Route reconetr uct ion from Baker to Grwe begins. x x x x x x G5. MILLIKEN AVENUE GRADE SEPARATION. PUC hearing report and Council direction [o proceed with formal design for grade separation. Staff report presented by Robert Batton, Consul tan[ from DeleW Ca th er. Mayor Stout polled the Council as to which design vas favored: Overpass Underpass Counnilman King Counril man Buq uet Mayor Stout Councilvaman Brown (Counc ilwaan Wright was absent) A CTION: Council concurred the Underpass design was more de eirabl e. City Cowcil Minutes Augsset 19, 1987 Page 23 t ~ t ~ t G6. ODNSIDERATION OP RESOLUTION DRGING APPROVAL OP MRASURH ^A" ON THH NUVBMBBR 19, 1987 BALLOT - Resolution provides support to ballot measure which could impl sent em addiiioml onrhalf cent sales tax to be utilized for traffic imprwaent needs. RBSOLUTION NO. 87-463 A RHS OLUTZON OF THE QTY OOUNCLL OP THE QTY OP RANa10 WCAlbNGA, CALIFORNIA, URGING APPROVAL POR t~ASURH A, A NUN1R-WIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVE[~@NT PROGRAM MOTION: Moved by Ring, seconded by Stout to approve Resolution No. 87-463. Motion carried ¢0-1 (Wright ebaent). ~ R ~ * + A G7. CONSIDERATION OF WORKSHOP DATBS TO DISCUSS CITY GOALS. ACTION: Council concurred in setting Tuesday, September 22, 1987, 5:30 p. m. in the Lion's Park Community Center for said workshop. * # # G8. DISCUSSION TO DESIGNATE A VOTING DHLBGATH FOR LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL GONFERHNCS SCRBDULED POR OCfOBHR 4 THROUGH 7TH, 1987. ACTION: Council concurred the voting delegate be Dennis L. Stout end the alternate be Carl es J. Buquei II. • : ~ + : n H. GODNCIL B0.9IN~S NO ITEMS SUEMITTHD • + * ~ ~ I. IDENTIPIGTION 0[ ITN FOR NHST MdBTING a, Interim solutions to noise levels and amplification probl ems in parka (,disturbing the peace). b. Perking on streets. c. Inveetiga to trains blocking main streets (i. e. Haven Avenue). d. Consider participation in Weet Valley Solid Waste Coalition. City Cowcil Minvtm~ Auguat 19, 1987 Page 24 +i+. ex+ J. QMOIQCATIO~ PACT[ 1E6 PUBLIC !A ITEMS SUBNITTBD • r Y. AATCWtIlAiNi NOTION: Moved by 8romn, seconded by Buquet to edj ~~rn. Motion carried ¢0-1 (Wright absent). the meeting adjourned at 12:55 a. m. Respectfully submitted, Beverly A. AnLhelei City Gl ark Approved: ~ Septaber 2, 1967 CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting A. CALL TO ORDHR A regal er meeting of the City Comcil of !be City of Rancho Cucamonga met an Wednesday, September 2, 1987, in the Lions Park Commmity Center, 4161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. The meeting was called to order at 7:35 p. m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present vere Comcilmembere: Deborah N. Brown, Charles J. Suquet 2I, Jeffrey King, Pasela J. Wright, and Mayor Demie L. Stout. Also present vere: City Memger, Lauren M. Weaaeven; Deputy City Clerk, Debts Ademe; City Attorney, Mdy Arezyneki; Aesietnnt City Mamger, Robert Rizzo; Sr. Adm.iniatrative Amlyet, Merk Lorimer; Coumity Devel opmmt Director, Jack Len; City Planner, Brad Buller; City Eagimer, Russell Heguire; and Commwity Services Director, Bill Holley x x x x f x B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESBNTATIONS No ennomcemente were made. x x * x x C. CONSENT CALENDAR C1. Approval of Warrants, Register Noss. 8/19/87 and 8/26/87 and Payroll ending 8/20/07 for the totes emomt of $1,658,308.33. C2. Approval to receive end file current Investment Schedule ae of August 31, 1987. C3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sele Beer S Wine F,ating Y1 ace, Club Sandwich, Mary t.ou A. Contoy, 9269 Utica Ave., Ste. 155. C4. Alcoholic Beverage Appl icatian for On Sale Beer A Wine Bating Place, R, N. Breaky's, Cypr in F. a Mary L. Huck, fi798 - 19th Street. G5. Approval tc ezecute Contract Change Order No. 1 (CO /87-022) for Don Gteek and Aesocie[es for revisions to the plane end specifications for Arrow Route Street Rehabilitation and Widening, phase I (North Side) and Phase II (3outh Side) from Arch ibeld Avenue to Turner Avenue in an amomi of $1,895.00. City Council Minutaa September 2, 1987 Pnge 2 C6. Approval to execute Agreement (CO i57-131) for Installation of Publ is Improvement and dedication between Johnson Liao apd Aita Liao and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Imprwemmte ai 9874 ALZON Route. RESOLUTION N0. 87-464 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP TRR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT POR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROFEMENT AND DEDI GTION PROM JORNSON LLAO AND RITA LIAO AND AUTHORIZII~ THE MAYOR AND CITY CLeRR TO SIGN SAME C7. Approval to execute Agre®mt (CO ;87-12fi) for Installation of Public Improvement amd Dedication betwem Richard N. Piel der, Petay G. Fielder end Sheryl Lyvn Fielder end the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Imprw®ents et 9564 Arrw Rovte. RESOLUTION N0. 57-465 A AESOLUTION OP TAE CITY COUNCIL OP TtiE CITY OF RANCHO CUGIUNGA, CAi.IFORNIA. ACCEPTING AN AGRE@ffiNT FDR INSTALLATION OP PUBLIC ItiPROFBlBNT AND DEDI GTION PROM RICHARD N. PIELDHR, FATSY G. PIHLDER AND SHERYL LYNN FIELDER AND AUTNORIZ ING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLHRP. TO SIGN SAMR C8. Approval to execute Contract Chmge Order No. 1 (CO ;86-114) with Liwille, Inc., for preparation of a Striping Plan on eeee Line Roed from Lion Street to Hellman Avenue and from Hellman Avenue to Archibald Avenue in conj unc[ion pith the Base Line Widening Project in en amount of $2,225.00. C9. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement end Improvement Security for DR 87-01, located on the nor iheaet corner of Arrw Highway and Maple Place, submitted by Davie Development. RESOLUTION N0. 87-466 A AESDI.UTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPRWING IMPROPEt~@NT AGREEMENT AND IMPROV~NT SECURITY POR DR 87-01 C10. Approval to eaecute Improvement Agreement end Improvement Security for DR R7-02, lcceted at 95 nn Santa Anita Avenva, submitted by Ei ghtean Sena Anita Partnership. RESOLUTION N0. B7-467 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL IPORNIA, APPRWING IMFR098MBNT AGREffiNSNT ANC IMPRWFMENT SECURITY FOR DR 87-02 City Comcil Miantee Septmber 2, 1987 Page 3 C11. Approval to execute Zaptwmeni Agremmt and Imprwment Security for Tract 9225 located on the south aide of Orange Street, between Carnal iaa and Jasper Street, submitted by Rill Willime Company. RffiOLOTION NO. 87-468 A RffiQ.DTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TRS QTY OP RAN410 COCAMONGA. GLIFORPIA, APPROVING IMPROVHI~NT AGRBBMBNT AND IMPROVHNRNT SECURITY POR TRACE 9225 C12. Approval to ezecute Aprwment Agrement and Imprwment Security for Parcel Map 7441, located vest of Amethyst Avenue, between Lomita and Le Grenda Drives, submitted by Domld end Jem M. Tackett. RffiOLOTfON NO. 87-469 A RESOLUTIOq OF THE QTY COIINCri OP THE QTY OP RANQIO CUGlDNGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING INPROVeNHNT tSRERffiNT AND IMPROPBIffi1T SEWRITY POR PARCHL NAP 7441 C13. Approval to execute Lpzwseat 8xteneioa Agremeot for Tracts 13022 end 13057, located in the Victoria Planned Caeaunity, submitted by the Willim Lyon Company. RESOLUTION N0. 87-470 A RffiOLUTION OF TRH CITY COUNCIL OP THH CITY OP RANQ10 CUCAMONGA, GLIPORNIA, APPROVING I1@ItOPH!ffiNT ERTRiSION AGREEMENT AND Itfl'ROVffi~BNT SSWRITY POR TRACES 13022 AND 13057 014. Approval to execute Imprwment Agrement and Imprwment Security for Tract 13052, located oa Haas Line Road, vest of Etiaanda Avenue, submitted by the William Lyon Compeaq for work oa Bese Line Road in the vicinity of the intersection of Bese Line Road and Victoria Park Lene. RESOLUTION N0. 87-471 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP TNH CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA. APPRGV ING IMPROVPAIILNT AG RESMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECJRITY FOR TRACE 13052 POR THE WORK ON BASE LIME ROAD TO THH VICINITY OP THP INTBRSHOTION OP HASH LINE ROAD AND VICIORIA PARK LANH City Cauacil Minutem September 2, 1987 Page 4 C15. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Boade sad Notice of Completion for: Parcel Mep 8828 - located on the vest aide of Vineyard Avenue betreen Arsw Highray and Ninth Street. Release: Faithful Performance Bo¢d (Street) $ 88,000 RESOLUTION N0. 87-472 A RESQ.IITION OF TIIE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAlpNGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC INPRODEMENTS POR PAACBL MAP 8828 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OP COMPLETION FOR THE NORR C16. Approval to accept Improvements, Reduction of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 11781, located on the northmeet corner of 19th Street end Hermosa Avenue. Reduce: Faithful Perfozmance Surety (Serest) from $92,000 to Iaintenance Guarantee Amount of $9,200 RESOLUTION N0. 87-473 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS POR TRACT 117 R1 AND AUTHOAIZ ING THE FILING OP A NOTICE OP COMPLETION FOR THE WORK C17. Apprwel to authorize the emergency repairs to Hellman Avenue south of 8th, utilizing Annual Maintenance and Emergency Repair Contract. Budgeted amount ie $155,000.00. C18. Apprwel to award the Purchase of two (2) 3/4-ton pick-up trucks, two (2) 1-ton crev cab flatbed trucks with modifications, two (2) multi-purpose utility vehicl ea, and one (1) 1/2-ton pick-up truck io Fuller Pord of Chula Viete, Cal iforni e, ea the lweet reeponeible bidder for the total amount of $138,x75,12. C19. Apprwel to award the Haven Avenue Mediene Beautification, Phase I Improvement Project from Arrw Route to 19th Street, to Valley Crest Lends cape, Inc„ for the amount of $1,112,954.38. CZO. Apprwel to ew and the Tref fic Signal et Haven Avenue end 4ih Street Improvement Project to Sierra Pe cif ic, Inc. for the amount of $117,516.00. City Comcil Minutes Septeaber 2, 1987 Psge 5 C21. Approval to ezecute Agrea•ents For Hngineering Services For leadecape plm checking with J.F. Dsvideon Associated (CO t87-127) and B.S.I. Caneul teats, Inc. (00 /87-128) rio (2) separate coaitacte foz Fiscal Year 1987-88. C22. Approval of a Resolution Ordering Preparation of Reapportioment Report for Parcel Map 10543 rithin The Sizth Street Industrial Park Refund District (82-1 R). R830LIITION NO. 87-474 A RESOLUTION OF TRH CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TNH PRHPARATION OF A REAPYORTION!ffi7T REPORT AND ANHNDHD ASSSSSMBNT AND DIAGRAM IN ASSHSSMENT DISTRICT' AND ESTABLISHING REAPPORTIONMBNT FHHS FOR PARCffi. MAP 10543 WITRIN 1R6 SI$T!1 STRSBT INDUSTRIAL PARR RHFUND DISTRICT (82-1R) C23. Approval of a Resolution Ordering Prapezntion of Reepportionaent Report for Parcel Nap 10008 rithin The Sirth Street Industrial Perk Refund District (82-1R). RBSOLUTION N0. 87-475 A RESOLUTION OP TNH CITY ODUNCIL OF TRH CITY OP AANCl10 CUCANDNGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TNH PRHYARATION ON A RBAPPORTZONMHNT REPORT AND A1DINDSD ASSESSMENT AND DIAGRAM IN ASSSSSM@iT DISTRICT AND ESTABLISHING REAPPORTIONMENT PEES FOR PARCBL MAP 10008 WITNSN TN6 S1X'1'N S'1REE'1' 1NUU JY'a1N. revu. RBFUND DISTRICT (82-1 R) C24. Approval to authorize the Allocation of $10,000.00 from General Pund unallocated balance to City Facil iiiee Account (4245-7044) for the purchase of additional telecommunications equipment compatible rich ezieting eyeten. C25. Approval to authorize a letter to the County Environmental Neal eh Director eapreesing the City's intent on continuing its current contract with the Weet Valley Vector Control District for Vector Services. C26. Approval to receive end file report from Telecommunica [ions Management Corporation regarding recommendations made in response to a proposal for a franchise agreement rith Comcest Cabl evision. C27. Approval to continue Appropriafione and Encumbrances from PY 66-87 Co FY 87-88, and appropriate the funds to the account ae outlined in the report. C28. Approval of The Conceptual Development Plane foz rio (2) future parks in the Vict orie Vineyards North Commvnity,Ite~ coetinred to Septrber 16, 1987 meeting. City Council Minutes September 2, 1987 Page 6 C29. Set public bearing for September 16, 1987 - Milliken Avenue Grade Separation Emirofinentel Assessment Review. RFSOLUTION N0. 87-476 A RESOLUTION OP 17TH CI1R COUNCIL OF TNH CITY OP RANCHO CUGAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROFING AND SETTING A POBLIC NEARRJG DATC OP WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 1987 FOR T8E MILLIREN AVENUe GRADS SEPARATION EN9IRONMBNTAL ASSESSMHNT REIIBW C30. Set public hearing for September 16, 1987 - Appeal of Undergrounding Overhead Utility Condition required by the Planning Commiaeion on July 22, 1987 for Tentative Parcel Map No. 5996, located on the south aide of Nil eon Avenue, vest of Haven Avenue. C31. Set public hearing for September 16, 1987 - Environmental Assesaent and Victoria Community Plan /uendment 87-01 - Willi® Lyon Company - A request to emend the Victoria Community Plm text to reduce the minimum required lot depth on 3,000 square Foot lots from 75 feet to 60 feet, to reduce the minimum required lot depth on 4,000 square foot lots from 80 feet to 70 feel, and to require a minimum ten (10) foot front yard setback for the living area on 3,000 end 4,000 square foot lots. C32. See public bearing for October 7, 1987 - Approval to Mnez DR 87-01 located at 11288 Amos Route io Londe cape Maintenance District No. 3 ae Mneaetion No. 6. RESOLUTION 87-477 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 6 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0, 3 RESOLUTION N0. 57-478 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL IFORIIIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TD ORDER 1H8 ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTR2Cf N0. i, AS ASSESSMRNT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 6 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3; PURSJANI TO iliE LANDSWFihT. AND LIGH^aIlw AC OP i572 AND OPFERING A TIME AND PLACE POR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO C33. Set public hearing for October 7, 1987 - Approval to Mnez DR 87-0I located et 11268 Arrow Route to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 ae Annexation No. 31 and to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 ee Annexation No. 4. City Council Minntem Septaber 2, 1487 Page 7 RHSOLUTION NO. 87-479 A RESOLUTION OF THS CITY OOUNCIL OP TRR QTY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OP PAffi.IMINARY APPRCAAL OP CITY 8NGII7HHR'S REPORT FOR ANNHEATION N0. 31 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 RE3OLUTION NO. 87-480 A RESOLUTION OF TH6 CITY COUNCIL OF TNS QTY OP RANCHO WCAIFINGA, CALIFORNIA. DHQ,ARING ITS INTENTION 1U ORDER TNH ANNBRATION TO STRHHT LIGHTING MAII7T&7ANCS DISTRICT N0. 1, AN A55333MHNT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEIfATION AS ANNESATION NO. 31 TD STREET LIGHTING IfAIN18NANCE DISTRICT N0. 1; PURSUANT TO THB LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFPHRING A TIl~ AND PLACE FDR HEARING OBJECTIONS TAHRHI0 RESOLUTION N0. 87-481 A RPS~.OTION OF THE QTY COUNCIL OP TRH QTY OP RANCHO g1CAH1NGA, CALIFORNIA, OP PRFI.IlQNARY APPROPAL OP CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNHKATION NO. 4 1U STRBBT LIGATING MAINTENANCE DI STRICT N0. 6 RESOLUTION NO. 87-482 A RESOLUTION OF TAE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO U1lAMJNIiA, lw:.aruamin, L'nu.i+i.uw ANNERATION TO STRBET LIGHTING NAINTHNANCE DISTRICT NO. ~6, AN ASSESSlIIiNT DISTRICT: DHSR;NATING SAID ANNH%TION AS ANNESATION N0. 4 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6; PURSUANT TO THS LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OP 1972 AND OFFERING A TI!ffi AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THHRETO MOTION: Moved by King, secoaded by Nright to approve the Consent Gel ender rith the ezception of Item 26. Molioa carried 5-0, • * * x + D. CONSHNT ORDINANCES The fol loa ing Ordinances have had public hearings et the time of first reading. Second ieadinge are ezpected tc be rcuti ne fled ¢on-contiwerei el. They will be acted upon by the Council et one time aiihout discussion. The Ciiy C1 etk sill reed the title. Any item can be removed foz discussion. NONB SUBMITTED * * • * • ~ City Council Minutaa Septeaber 2, 1987 Page 8 B. AD98RTISSD PUBLIC HBARINGS Mr. Naeaermm elated that Ilea ffi needed to be continued so Septeaber 16, 1987 et the request of the eppl icant. See regal er order of agenda for action. It®s 81, 2, 3 and 4 rare acted upon ea one item. E1. HNYIRONHENTAL ZHFACT ASPOAT FOR THS FOOTHILL HOULSVARD SPHCZFIC PLAN AND GHNHRAL PLAN AMHISIlHiNT N0. 87-038 - To revlar and consider a recoaaendation for certification of the Draft 8wirootenial Iapect Report for the Foothill Specific Plm and General Plan Aaendment 87-03B Project, the Specific Plm conaiete of detailed lend we regal etione end etmdarde for the level opae¢t along Foothill Boulevard betrem Grove Avenue cad Haven Avenue, bebeen the I-15 Preerey and Beat Avenue. THI9 IT8l1 E®IG ODRI10~ TO 86Pl1168R 16, 1967. ffi. 6NPIRONMSNTAL AS8888MSNT AND HTINANDA SPHCIPIC PLAN Al@tBIMBNT 87-02 -CITY OP RANCHO COCANONGA - An aeendaenL fo remove fray the Btirmda Specific Plm approrlastelq 57 acrea of land on the north aids of Foothill Soul evard bttrem the I-13 Frearey and Beat Avenue; appraziaetaly 5 ecraa of lend on [ha aouiheaat corner of 6tirmda Avenue and Foothill Houl evard; end approxisately 14 ecraa of lend on the southreat corner of Haet Avenue end Foothill Boulevard - APN 227-211-24„ 25 and 27, APH 227-221-01-03, 07-09. 14 end 22-27, APN 227-731-19, 21, 28, 29, 33 and 34, APN 229-311-14 and 15. APN 229-041-01, and portions of APN 227-231-16 and 23. THIS TY811 DHIIR. CflRlIIIQQI YO H8PT81m1~ 16, 1987. B3. 6NVIRONMBNTAL ASSBSSMBNT A1ID INDUSTRIAL SPHCIPIC PLAN AMHlU)MENT 87-0I - GITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONCA - M aaendment to reeve from the Industrial Specific Plan epprozimately HO acrea of land on the south aide of Foothill Boulevard betreen the I-15 Preeray and Stirmde Avenue - APN 229-031-01, 16 and 20 and portions of 229-021-57 and 59. 19IS IR'IDf 6ELIG OMI7DIU8D SO SEPPROfER 16, 1987 E4. ENPIROIPIHNTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AM8IIDNHNT 57-03H - wc;aNOeaa - A request io came the Lena Use Map of the General P1 an to reflect Send use chmgee proposed by the Foothill Boul everd Specific Plan. TAI9 TTdfl BeIRG OOMTilllf® 30 S8PI8l0Al 16, 1987. Msyor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was cl Deed, MOTION: Moved by Bing, seconded by Hroan to continue items H1, 2, 3 and 6 to Seprember Ib, I987. Morton carried 5-0. • + A ~ ~ City Comcil Minutes September 2, 1987 Psge 9 E5. wnaul,'rnnro - appeei or tae rianniag uomniesion~s recision requiring the preservation of en ezisting Magnolia tree, the vadergromding of e:ieting werheed utilities, and the conetrvetion of finie6 floor elevations along Hellman Avenue above the 100 year flood level for a residential tract eubdiviaion of 37 single tinily lots on 9.7 acres of Zend in the Gar Density Residential District (2-4 dwelling unite per acre), located at the northeast corner of Hellman Avenue end Tryon Street - APN 208-111-04. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. 7t,ere being no response, the public hearing over cl oeed, MOTION: Nwed bq Ring, seconded by Wright to continue Item ES to September 16, 1957. Motion carried 5-0. R R * R * R fib. APPEAL OP DBVELOPMSNT RBPZSW N0. 87-20 - SIBTN STRSHT - TURNBIt, LTD. - Appeal of Conditions of Approval requiring the undergrounding of szisting werheed aril tries ei ong Sizth Street for a proposed project located at the northeast corner of Turner Avenue and Sizth Stree[ - AYH 209-261-15, 19, and 22. Staff report by Barrye Hnnson, Sr. Civil Engineer. Meyer Stwt suggested that this item be referred beck to the Pl inning Commission. Councilmmber Wright stated she wanted to Neer the itm because she already had >,. vpluw., .... ~.,.a. Mayor Stwt opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council vas: John Will et, 6th Street Turner Ltd, stated he felt their situation was unique and that it would be rather costly to do who[ the City was asking. There being no further response, the public hearing was cl oeed. Discussion took place on the fees for undergrounding. Council member Buquet felt a waiver wee a good idea. Councilmember King felt it should be waived along 6th Street. Ccu.-.c ilWa,Se ra WrigF.: and Brawr. felt the W.de:grwrdirg a..uald take place. Mayor stout fell it ehculd be undergrounded so that it would be consistent with what the other pxaj acre have been required to do. MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Brwn to deny th. appeal with e Resolution coming hack September 16 supporting this denial. Motion carried 4-1 (King voted no). R* R R R R City Council Minutes September 2, 1987 Page 10 E7. ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH: A. ANNEXATION N0. 5 FOR CUP 85-26 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 3. RESOLUTION N0. 87-483 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THR WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 5 'TO STREET LIIiHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINBER'S REPORT FOR CUP 85-26 E. ANNEXATION N0. 2 FOR DR 86-38 AND DR 86-26 (PARCEL MAP 10237) TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6. RESOLUTION N0. 97-484 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCpMONGA, GU.IPORNIA. ORDBRING THE WORK IN OONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 2 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE OI STRICT N0. 6 AND ACCEPTING THS FINAL HNGINEER'S REPORT FOR DR 86-38 AND DR 86-26 (PARCEL NAP 10237) C. RESOLUTION N0. 87-4R5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THB QTY OP RANCHO CU CAlUNGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN ODNNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 28 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT POR CUP 84-37 {PARCEL MAP 8901), CUP 85-26, DR 85-37 (PARCEL 9409), DR 86-38, DR 86-26 AND PARCEL MAY 9504 Staff report by Lauren Was aermen, City Manager. Msy or Stout opened the meeting for public heezing. These being no reaponae, the public heating sae closed. MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Wright to adopt Resolution Noe. 87-483 ti,c vu gh E7-4~++. Motion tarried 5-0. * * * * • A E8. report by Leuzen Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing, There being no reaponae, the public hearing ace closed, City Council Minutes Septmber 2, 1987 Page 11 RESOLUTION N0. 87-486 A RESOLUTION OP TNH QTY WUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO WCAMONGA, CALZFORNIA. WNFIRMING AMENDED ASS&SSl0377T5 IN ASS&S SMENT DISTRICT 82-1R POR DR 84-49 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Eing to epprwe Resolution No. 87-486. Motion carried 5-0. • * ~ * R F. PUBLIC NHARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. NONH SUBMITTED. A h * A t G. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF RHPORTS G1. APPROVAL OP A RESOLUTION AUT110RIZING H7CECUTION OP rho ezpl eined the agreement and hw it worhe. ~.e. m o. u.. wu~ piaw •aw gwee~iuua w rir. JViieie by the l.oun crl. Mr. Wasserman stated that the intent was for the Mayor to sign the agreement which wfle to include Palm Springs. RESOLUTION NO. 87-487 A RESOLUTION OF THE QTY WUNCIL OP 1NE (TTY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROPINC, AllTHORIZ ING AND DIRECTING EXEWTION OF A JOINT E7CHRCISE OP POWERS AGREEMENT WITH THE CITIES PAIRPIELD, SANTA R03A AND PALM SPRINGS WITH RESPECT TO THE CREATION OP THE CCFC PINANCING AUTHORITY MOTION: Mw ed by Buq uet, seconded by Brown to sign the agreement end epprwe Resolution No. 87-487. Motion carried 5-0 A * * e e x G2. REVIEW OP CENTRAL PARR PROPOSED MASTER PLAN. WNTINUED FROM JULY 1, 1987 MEETING. Aill Holley, Community Services Director, introduced Pete Pitaesi of the ^erk. end Recreation Commission who gave staff report. Mr. Pi taesi introduced Bob Mueting of Moree Consul Ling who presented a elide pr esenteii on. City Council Minutes Septaber 2, 1987 Page 12 Mr. Piiasei stated that maty of the City's commissions and eery ice organizations hove approved the project end they hoped the Council would do the same. Sam Punter, Perk end Recreation Commission, stated be is in support of the project. Councilmember Wright naked xhet the coat would be. Mr. Noll ey stated about $35,000,000 total. Norm Guith, member of the Design Committee, stated he did not feel the park xovld stand the grorth of the community and felt increased sports facility apace vas needed. Diane Will isms, Priende of the Library, 7251 Amethyst, felt it would serve the needs for library fecil itiee. 8111 Wendell, resident, felt there would 6e a dangerous ai tuetion because of the bridge crossing into the park. Council member Ring said he did not agree pith the lakes because he felt more activity apace was needed. Councilmember Wzight asked what action Che Comcil was act welly supposed to take tonight. nnyor ar.ouc commenced ciiny waaa w give ii~eia ainaugiaw ap ci,n case. maw Recreation Commission on the design. Council member Wright said she wean'[ euze we had enough information to approve the total design and be locked into that approval at this time. She fell the Council should give approval on each section of the park end set each section in priority order. Counc it member Braxn eteted she did not want this park to be another situation l ilce Red Hill. She felt the Council should have more infozmation on this. Mr. Waesexman informed the Council on the process to get Central Park built. Mayor Stout eteted he felt comfortable with the conceptual design. Ne felt tine lakes issue and active vs. passive issue should be thought out end studied bef era ccr,wptual deaigr. is apprc: ed. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buquet to adopt the conceptual design of she Central Perk Pi an but stipulated they wanted more communication to Council on the design. Motion carried ~rl (Ring voted no). MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Brwn authariz ing the Perk and Recreation Commieei on to go ahead with step 2 of the design process. Motion carried 4-1 (King voted no). City Covnoil Minute September 2, 1987 Page 13 • t ~ Mayor Stout celled a recess ai 9:37 p. m. The meeting recawened et 10:04 p. m. with all mmbers of Couvnil present. • * • * e G3. REgIRW OF PARR DB4ffi.OPHBhT FB6 SCFffiDULB. CONTINUBD FROH JULY 15, 1987 MBBTING. It ras requested that this itm be continued to September 16, 1987. w e ~ e e The City could have access to the school's basketball courts and the school district would have access to the grass arse and fiel de. Councilmember Brwn stated she hee talked xieh Carleton Lightfoot xho indicated he vas not in agreealeni with the total plan. Councilmember Buquet felt that because re hove had eo many probl ems ri[h this school di att ict, that re should make sure everything is in black and chits. Mayor Stout egr eed pith this and felt there rae not enough in it for the City. Xe felt the City should go back to the school district and renegotiate. Council member Wright did not feel we should delay this because of school aCeriing neat Meek. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Brwn to duty rhie agreement and for staff to go back to the school dietritt and renegotiate. Motion carried 5-0. MOTION: Mw ed by Brwn, seconded by Buquet that no joint use agreement take place rith a school district unless the school iwolved ie at least 6 scree in air e, Motion carried 4-1 (Y.ing voted no). A * + * ~ Mayor Stout asked chat the City and the school district could be getting out of this. City Council Minutes September 2, 1987 Page 14 GS Staff report by Nalt Brad Buller, City 8ngineer, al no gave hie input on why re should oppose the proposed paver p1anY. Mayor Stout asked if we were wasting our time in trying to atop this. Rues Maguire eteted if ve go before the Board nw we will have better luck nt stopping it. Re felt ve should adopt the Resolution and send a letter to the Metropolitan Neter District asking to be placed on their agenda to ezpreas our concerns. RHSQ.UTION N0. 87-488 A RESOLUTION OP THB QTY COUNCIL OF THE QTY OP RANCHO WCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA. OPPOSING 11tE METROPOLITAN HATER DISTRICTS PROPOSED POWER PLANT MOTION: Moved by Huquet, seconded by Brwn to approve Resolution No. 87-488 and prepare the appropriate correspondence to the fHD to try to atop the proposed paver plant. Motion carried 5-0. • • • ,t G6. UPDATE ON MERCY Al~ULANCH RESPON56 TIMH - REQUEST TO COMlI11U6 TD 9EPTH1lBA 16, 1987 !0$TlEG. Item continued to September 16, 1987. f. * * • w + C7. DISCUSSION OP POLICY MATTERS RELATED TO HAVEN AVENUE MEDIANS. Staff report by bred Buller. City Planner. Tim Beedl e, a representative For the wnere of this Bite, eapl wined hw he felt shout the medians. Countilmember King eteted he felt uncomfortable with a cut in the median betauae everyone could vent to do this. Councilmember Wright stated she liked option 1 in the staff report. Council member King agreed vith Councilmember Wright on that point. Councilmember Brwn said she would be in favor of the hreek but not until the project ie in there and at their coat. City Couneil Minu[em September 2, 1987 Page 15 Councilmember Buquet said be would go along with the median break depending on what vas going in there. Mayor St wt stated he vas not in favor of option 1 unless it had conditions on it end then it could be considered. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Brwn for staff to bring back a Reeolutiw of intent w what would be required of a developer to get the median break. Motion carried 5-0. * * * * * * G8. STATDS REPORT ON TNR DEPEf.OPMHNT OP Avdy Aresynaki, City Attorney, reported on the liability of this eituntiw. Councilmember Wright stated hw she has been trying for years to get something done io cl oee the carryon. Mayor Stout felt that the canyon should be cl oeed after dark and that the City should work with the Porest Service on this. Cowcilmember Brwn felt the entire Council should work together on this problem. The Council concurred that Councilmembera Brwn and Wright would work together ae a subcommittee and a Reeol u[ion would be brought beck et the neat meeting on the Council's concern e. Art Bridge. 8715 Banyan, at ated he would like the road cl oeed leading into the canyon end said he has attempt ed Co post signs to keep people out. * * * * * * H. COUNCIL BUSINESS H1. ANIMAL CONTROL STATUS REPORT - Statue report by Mark Loriver, Br. Admini etretive As eistent. There war's ne qua eti one of discussion. x * * * * * H2. CONSIDERATION OF MATTERS PERTAINING TO CONTROLS FOR AMPLIPTCATION AND SOUND LEVELS IN CITY PARKS - Staff report by Bill Holley, Director of Community Services. No discoeai on Cook place. City Cowcil Minntu September 2, 1987 Page 16 * t • e ~ a H3 e Mr. Waeeemen stated re rill be sending a letter to the Aail road stating our concerns. + • * + • f H4. CONSIDHR PARTICIPATION IN WEST VALLHY SOLZD HASTE COALITION. Oral report by Covncilmember Debozah Brorn. The Cotmcil decided that Councilmem6ere Brown and Wright could serve ae a eubcommiteee to cork on this. A Resolution is to come back et the nezt seating. • ~ t • x t I. IDENTIPICATION OF ITEMS POR NE%T NESTING I1. Covacilmember Wright requested that in October the would like a report to Comcil on the hours of operation et the Sheriff's Station on 9t6 Street. She could el eo like to have the optiene ae to manning personnel 24 hours per day and what other stations aan 24 hours, chat are the soars. arr.. ;,,.,,.i..an e~ r.. this, I2. Councilmember Huquet requested that in Nav®ber fot staff to report to them on the abandoned vehicle problem with a brief rev ier of the Ordinances pertaining to same. He mentioned an abandoned vehicle on Vineyard Avenue which hsa been there arms time. • x + a ~ a S. COtRAUNICATI0N5 FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibi to the City Council from addressing any issue not prev iouely included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter far a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited io five minutes per indiv iduel. No comments from the public. City Co:mcil Minatea SepteaMr 2, 1987 Fags 17 &. AD.TOURNMRNT MOT10N: Moved by SLOUt, seconded by Bnquet to recess to esecutiva session, but for the meeting to adjourn to Septsbar 8 to disease Foothill Boulevard Specific P1 aa. Meeting adj onrnad et 12:39 a. a. lotion carried 5-0. Respectfully eubaitted, Debra Adeae Deputy City Glerk Approved: ohaoamoraorooorvorvoaooraoa • 1 °o o r o nm°n hmnompnmPOn~nohmo....o oorvgmr -• ii n n nao ~ ~pI~am~h~omr=wtim-. ao r'are a ~ a rlm•IN .JnPwPTn mh mm O~•r u rci I __ n..h Nrr ,w ¢ ~a.. ¢< < 1 .. h ...... .. m :r u< o ~ i ¢ u i 0 2 z a< N S 0 q a r P LL o..nrnnmrq ar~oPO•.N nrN ar- Po~grv m~mahmpo ..rvnrma ..n rvaaNNNmmNnNrrrrrrrr:r mggmmaaaaaaa NrrNm...hi-hh.-hnhhhhhhhhhhi-~-h°hl-rr•rl-~-i-hhhl-I-r- h. h hh. ~^. ti hh. h. ~.h..h. ~.h..h..h, ti tih. h.'_"..: h. h. h h. ", ~h. h. ~.h. ~..h..h..h. h, ti I^1 ~ f w ^ ~ P N a i W W N L WzW~ m2 z W .~+.Yi w < .. .. .. w .~ .~ c .~ n w i rN- r a ¢ o i A V V •~ O tYi V n O z W a i y ~ V 2 O ~ 2 w~ U U Y F~ i i uow V V V 2 > LLN1 u ' < ~ ~ ~ u K N 2 N 3 > i ~ t W LL V O = W _ O O < O ~ < ~ ~Y z ~- { u < u o N ' Y U i USN ¢ a V LL 6 pO a OOq m n ma.. : ^ F a _ ¢ ¢¢¢" ¢¢.J. x N 2 x x z22o S:W o F c opo `o oo~ `o oQN Wpj W N L12W WWW¢ WWww Sr~•+J upll qm 6 MU i<H< ¢nQON U ~ YOh~ w~W JOU N•y J _ 6 NuNN m o z^o z¢wN° m owM~MWh u >h `~¢ KW2 Z GJ Um ~ l6YQ w u V~ V m¢¢IL O MtiZNUW Y WZtt6w~J%htiw 6¢w¢ J iFWNS¢ ~Nm¢N62Nwlq••2h1¢N~VVN~mY JJI m hw UNS` •~• 27h <¢W ZPNF <ZRmm WYCYW S•~O ZhwwJV J•• Z¢hNJ¢ZS•+Z ~ommu •22 W¢ma.. ~..W JwmwW <W Z<pw360V <ufUUN2NJmw6Nrvi¢LJUV¢NTL¢ Z J 2 <N V Y .u. < ~ s z ¢ ~ ~ N ~ mu r i 2 ~ 2 WAN NV Z U Z U O Yh IlV 22U V V N W Li YU~N¢ NIti N r2i yUi s pp U VNWJOS1uLLm ~• Y J2 < Jo.+ ohh o z ua«aJWa<n°¢J 6Z ZUNWSNNw SJWUG'm ~~m¢o~<: iz.uww iN~o i.J-z~o¢.S.e lOW¢~20WJnl •Zi~Wh¢<_U Z~VSt Jh a¢JWJUFNJN~jN~j tiJ 21~V ~h~~fJ <a<a~«mmmmUVUUVOVV~~Vmm< N rVhOhrrynhmrNN gl•Ih ~P~,,,11 ..a PONNNr •~ .yh~SnrPrPWahi•10 aNr-~iO P.•.. oo`n°o~nm±oripo n N.r~-o°ao~°n almr°oin.h. °o o om°or°v onoo+o~~mo °p a.q. OmYPONnPprmOOPOOmONanIgVOPlagq~/mm~NryrfnmrOry m nPNnOP aNm 1 qN NNh ..~mmgn •. PYN Z ~ L ¢ 7 j U N P ry •~ N N ^'~ m m L ZZ Lqm>NZ ZO L L NL wTNtiWW ~OVn 1-m n¢ nw mN n 2M ~s •i~ a ~u u u uzwWJ o _ a __ H2O Z SW <~+N < 6 mN n ww X200 02 •Ywi~ O Y UWn ~ WOOwrv~Wn W OV ¢W wWS OV i WG ULLJM¢n n2 LW YLL V n M m¢aN >¢ J JN>M_ 2 ¢y n_ V O m6<W W h0 ¢wWNNZNrUn< NQN LGL m U Z V6 x DY JO__<O~<O J_IY_ p>¢p Nui UWW> < ZI Z~Ow 6 ~ <NWU N NW U LL u N Gww S ip WO ¢ m J > ¢OODONi~m GU 2 LO•. sao umLn ~ Way ¢ J¢.1 ~ .. ~ ow mi zwz z ir.i amyl Wsw >mz.Nw i~iiz< zuo mzorvL z`m x w zoor."+yy¢ N a <>w wF02 >n JIJU> U 2nh¢LyL¢LtiNw~Ow~l G L>Y <6 2<~« < 20YZ wOU >wYNwwNUZNOw V>JN O<J ynOT<JJN_ hOJ{YYO<{Y<NYZO m VO pa>6 Zm<VLLJJnj>V OU •¢<~WQ¢¢OQwONN¢<W¢Wm~<6'YS LL ¢ownnYw uz>s>wwzwm ornJOnw<JCwum ou<~wpozN<w¢q w»w>¢ •on<n¢¢....ow> ai nmuJNn¢N..psaxuoou°a~oap¢owhgJaJnWSpmum n,J. ~-OPO•+NmrganmPO•.N OI •'gahmPONNm~q anOPOnNmMgan aaannnhhnhh~nhOfhnrnrnrrnrrnnrM1YYm4V000Ve a wz V Vp 2 1 ¢wJ ¢>Y OLn OSY 1 K p G4rv wm 1 < wOF LL V ¢ 6JN 1 OU V O O WZ G UV¢ 1 4 YWr. I fp6~ 2~ D mV ONOO N.rp ¢ ><10n V V20 yV V 6wn~.. L _ Zu U_ OU d'J N__ WJ6L m V.I Q , Z.r .[r n NYrwN K ¢1' VZ ZU wm V n 1-'W Y>,N~YJ rLn VN UN < Sr~w ~Y L SLJwZ iw J6>w N6>OOJ S V NVnNW ¢ZVV J¢<VV UM1JLLWN¢<¢m LOh JOa mLU¢JnY02p WZtiZN F10 <SJ< J Gwn2WOY p z~~ r NW~a¢ml-z..c Y>zJ aNZW aN'~ei sNiowu'~ OU ~2hS ~+¢YO>6nW OU<Y2WWw WinVO J> VO Z 20inJ YLt1J0 <N LI-WNW'IU¢L2 LOVVJNO VN <ZYSSMVZZZ < Y20 wtZ¢ i 2p p VO<Ui wl-6ww2 <Q>NJMO >LNVLnw> wl..l f¢U R'u• J ¢FY •1-ZNwOY •J •¢wJJ 2>Y ~IYF'-OwN wV<Z Or~C H ~NNV¢ZJUUWJLLVhJJWa~3yWWZ6¢JZ>¢HYwI-{uUZ m OOOWwWUOV2>¢SZN~NY2JJJ~JLLZSLZZOLZL~DOOLL6 YI <1 mnq.rmPNhS ~.+amaNgPOUNrhahmmOaOgPrq J•+a m'f nPN I OOmONNPm..nrPgOaaamwhmOnnrv~IryhaOhONmO m.+N NNr o ..- wan h..o .. ....n PnrvomomaN vm mannrmNmrvn u i .. ... .. .. .. .. .... ..nn n .. n..nn .. 2 rO1°mm~°.1°-m °o ~~°o Dm uoeroi+mcoi °o .D.oo c~°no ~i m i-rv .~~n u:iiona~ooina .c m.:o n-~. c~nmo~.. oo+rvNmrvr..o m+nrnoaa n~-a ono n~-mo <.i Nm NNmr -.ram om Nr m ¢1 ¢ 1 .~ .~ T n` < 1 .. .+ x I ., 1 i o..N mrNmhm.ornT+Dmhmmornm+N a ¢ J~Jrrrrn~nrrrrNNNNNNNrvrynTTTTTT i ¢~ ommrrmmFmDrm~DDDmD~D~~~aDtiF~ u i 1 .:.........h ................h............1 ...1 n.......... 0 1 VN Y 0 1 hs ii i i i iiii i s u V 1 p 1"'r Yl- z 2 I rr ~+ ¢ rrrr ~+ M ~+ V 1 Xr 2 <Z ¢6 6 ¢ ¢¢¢6 ¢ ¢ 2 2 Sw __ 2 _ ___ _J 1 ~S S ~U Oj O ryp a00p G rOWO O ~ 1 7S ONr <V W tY r+W WWWW W ¢W W U LL Nl 1 ¢ L 7 U rl- O 1 O ¢ U m6¢ a ~LZ i ..~ u¢r ~>s uwN ~i 61 m7N lpV WUW 1> J< arWNwf UI 20U 372 <Lm¢ « «6 NI-Z w0 OSOh YpWrZw wl w `N< Vpmi r122N wa6GYrri WI UZW raWZwWhtit WVJ2p <~4pWW¢< Z_< arz+UZiNW`JVw>2Y¢awti<~wpN w6 Jw +Ntay~~J J'rWNWTJnu6l~jn~~uwi L JLL IIJVZZ¢<J rOLU4ry¢uLrL4 OVpnr<rr¢wNwrry+hpwpLLlLLwOrpw 1 N~Lw~uJJwNr¢r62DTmUNV<LLN¢<UVJ u 000 r UVU 2 3 oop u LL L2 V J 6 J V www 2 N Kr 4<l H~ C V mN LL I <zzZ 6 Q 6< 222 ^YY 'JL 'J ¢r z¢N22 Opp Vr ILLUU OwmJ < YO U V'J ZuV<6 WJ 3 Oh L wO2wiJJJ <uZrw Z 2 <T~¢'J JN «< 2pJVL zw O m `aLW 2 Vai¢ VVVNDUO6~w¢JJQ LLK LpzVwp2222h D4YNfLL6YJp o T,M3 O r2WWr 222 W2ZW <`` V ~ Zmou wa¢LNwwwJ<r x-¢33 ~i r m2 V2pal-N<SSIy w w % miOZVp N L~'Hr¢LQ2 22Jr O J 1 wJw2W <,-YZZf<ppJU<fwa 2106X62 D wj 44~C6¢K2¢NNNm~NNNNNNNrwJVSi% Y I-ONUNNNNJDNmyPhYhNmy.pmmtiDmhP 6~ NOJ1r i"hTrmp r.~rryNDrTOrhrrO N mm0 rNNrh DmmmmmhmDmD+nON 3 i III I I ' i I ~ i ~ i , I o i i ' III I ~''. II I ~ I ~ ~ II I II i I, I I I i i l i ~y I I j d ~ ml NNOro qrm c:oo...noor-.+.eo I ti 'o ~.Ji o.w.o OJ -1 NNn .xNn aVnN woV ^~r aaNN ...~ i ~ n ir, ~ ~~ ~a ^,~.e~~l Por-Jjor Nnn wmc arv NJ ', I ~ W ml n r ~ ^~- a~.u..m nnanm ~P~.. c~i .- I ~I ,i i i w N '~ ~n I r N W I^ ~~ '~ ~ ~I'P'i i I I I t a i i Irv II '., I I ~. Z ill N.pn OP rNO ~YN mi+Yi J y PO NmlN ~P rry I I ~I r ON~mq~Fm frN`^ N J {r ua '< n n~rn hM rrrr-Y l~n rma0~ tin~rr uJ i ~ ^ i L Ww ~ a W N a {S O tW i i on. .=~i.r~. z~ ~¢.. •~i n W ar. I ¢ Y~r¢ ¢ W ¢ Wi i r rW i z W,. N ii z i I ' it < N zr iz.-6p~ rro o< ~u 2~~a~r. Ji ~ii r I ;~ a 'o i'a ~o N.iwz ~~°J~+°~ :~o loylw°u iL"'r~eJlll°^ ~ J `_I< Wr`rLL¢V vr<m ~<O¢U2rN C<W< WU` i ! ~i Ali ~Izn x¢ir iWuu il.i ~°.~.`-.~rz. °ur~~u' - ~°n i . i I Wz < OR iuo 1¢w66 ¢^w aJ i^ ill mLW {4L LI Y~IfNM l.1 ~SK VISA nu r rl ~ I I I U _~__ II !I Z I I l` ~ 'F ~I ~ r I~r I 2 w I~~ L V< l^ I'L 2 N 2 J ¢ r tyIUV I I i ' 2 S 'Wx a] VN '`J~na iS Y WSV+=2VN• }I6J M--{{ I i II, 6 N H ~ z'IN N~z i ' `max Ngw z°¢ io.W.Y mrcf:: I ', tY6VW 0¢L 9rn j = J 6Fr < WOWS ONiVi i ~W=V ~ 'I ~ ~n ¢ l JI • F 2 ONOw~ %O dJ 2 r I W ) » rIJO J Y^20p«my/b Yi00 CCNww ~ ' I, NI u Sl6 _ u «Rw< Z mm¢J 4 - O L N„ O ¢ C1MS mir+¢M<6 1Y ~ •S I Y' Z 6 MWw Jw < SV wJJ OY xJw Z.« ' ' .. it o u ~ oi~ NWN o W^W ao zww xu«oo u i, x z¢ h- <~wz J ~-rcaN SNi N.aJ ao v~r ..r < ¢Of rL O VJi¢6¢N«<r~JT WOJJ ~ V LL I ¢ S S Olr~~ly¢ {<f«f<mm6OmJ YOm41~UVV 'I ' N f it a n n NNp Nrr ml PP Nlrn mm rmm.l~Pr WNNr~ i P ^Ni~F iIPN N.nT p'OHr Nr~NNaMPNN -' mN Y(>Ir mN Nm dhPar Pn P ~ n m r .. I, j r ~ n -~ __ _ _ N r U Y w xi 2 s i ali < < j it U U i ¢ i ~i 2 Y A 0 rv a` P III it ~ ~O ~~ I ~O O p O I ~ I rv0 •P ~ II ~ Jn I~ • gO ~~ qJ .np Y1W ~i ~ ~~ I OJO DOaIOn..pp .) On aOO'~ON O~Op II! I i I ~ ~~ I Ii ~ dDO '~ OJa 1N0 ^ ~ • N^ ~ WO Y Om P ±~ •r pm t ' Om a1U Lyry,~• rv-Imm rv ' ~ q 1 OJrym rv O nq n ~ ~ m I. iO ^ .-IN Y c ' j N a ~ an as mW PO an g ~ nm m ma r~ qS ~~ •~N mm rq Y m0 mn m m0 ~F Om < PP PP mh nm an PP rm I PO Pal Op rn P n rv . nn .. ti ti n w I - w G a Wr~¢ r W 2Y °a.¢• W< ~o oa Wp ¢ ¢~ W N W ¢ au o ¢Y W W a r mi W mY ¢r ¢ N w A Ls po .. i o ~~ i `oi z o n 2 oa ~co s.. nab 2 ~ ¢ z LLo V~s°~t u ~iJ u =N WW o ~ .+ Ju Wp oW e~ No u~ W ., u ~ ~ N SO m„ LLw On ^f w6 Gn VO JO <W m JG LLZ N o Lw LL< a s• ~iN < o y1 p~ SN Oi f O ~1 VW O Ur ¢J i¢ ¢ O V JI L^ V V Wj « m V LJ f ~~ iw i1m Yn o FW ~~ =i °i "i ~a <ii nw r ¢i Ow m')w LL'tl: [ <J 6Y J¢11~6 LL1 ¢O LS u~ S•'~ ¢O i Z !iN 9 y I:] i n p y F 'W W I M OF i ¢ V W r ~N p ~ S S r N w • ~ U ¢ W I U N 1iw6 ~.iS r S J T yM NO it 'U { ~4nV ZV~acS] Zw~ J O Y •Lip n O~UV W S~ < UW f J of of <~" o.'. r.¢ r - ¢¢ ^ ~ o s i ?~J¢ o f wF ) V WyN~y~ fw N ~NV wW ~ZSV w¢ f S¢ <V 3L mw m` !Ol ~N 6J OWfwV ~ ~Wn 6b OL Np <r Ow v~jf ZN LLt p OV i0 SY O~ - WF t ¢ uJw uV YF J1 ¢ N < Sa 2'~ YJ JJiWS n i ¢m WV iN tN iN VJ O f SSM i 00 7 « J<vv~~OJ W`"~Yw ~~fr'iJr ~n,uu uuu vu °ux 3u~Ipp 00 0" pw~lww m~yww orv ~ou ry~.N a~mo n~a P.]am iN. m~r mPJ nmr-.rm I~, nM ^~gn~Pm •NNmP ~rnJN p m mN mm ma,wrn .~ nPm-. ~, ~ '~ m < K ° i f V Y zp i V Ti V 4 ¢1 ~1 p~ it Ill~i I~ I I II I l ' I I I I ~ °~ i I I j I I ~ i i I. I I II I II I I °n °o 'ro°I OP °p °1n ~°v.e~~ Pomi ^D no lloo+~o m..~oJ m Ion I 'I ~' n~Nr ul rvIII a'~ o Fo oo WWWWWW on oau~nm as o.~, I ' M1O J,.ny ma0 rPU~ma ~aP ,n n.~wO N.. PJi rVr~lPa tiP ON mON N a~P ~~ 1(YN mP In m ~m N N I r n P im ..~P I N II I mPOti NIaF POrnm qa 9P ~.+ Y0.4 N OO J.~~+ w .. ..rv PN m~ Tm m ~ r`n Ynti Pn~rFFIP--P U~P FP Pn P^ n' ¢ 3^mq SN w Y w }W wj W ¢O m ~ PT ~o ¢w~;. ~~ a app .. ~.. a ~,~ W ¢Y~ C° °rFn OCW u¢ii ° wN >u¢i u¢i: u¢i mP '.7fSF Fi Iw f' OV O Oi ~O Jw O >ti N OJ2 n6 ~~I U wFaN + ~ W„ uOiW a W UW N W8 8. pJ ~W Yr I N =YZ L a~>a ~Jii ~m< li °u'C~ Y <N n,~. .z. "' iR" " z'^! m .S wzuZi¢u,I ul^.UmZNi z f7 i°^Fa O'^ W. n~N I VO °W N~+yZ ~OLLU M°Vp6 O P m JO ji aJ N O 'I Lit ff.f 1^ M Z ¢JF OmJ t SW vw ZO r9 ~¢V OV' VyZO° 20 )W mtiN2Z0 IwW d p Z < wr _O 1_$~II L ¢ 6 <Z VYL O hF Up< NCO N^N JIY J¢°F.00>-~~m N 0Y WJ O °W 1 Wm2JN fx66¢¢Ow¢p Ol y Of }pO~ZO 6W 6M Wzp u uzW °<W fs o.. ° mu o N°LLZ~~~~>Ni~oa..u $a wN<s~ :i z~~.J.LL Nz :¢ i~.,,a ~'~a.,p ~"' it W ui I I. I u I , 6 F u 1 1 N V w~ ~ Y i r J If ` oV. ~ w ~ Ip pln W < ¢ ~ Z I V_ V = ti O F Gf¢GNf fUH¢ WOfm¢ ZO M~w JwIW 1yW SV O°N p p L< ill J_xF~txa i~NN W wiym ¢z..i<o Rr x2JY;vi=o °L ;f`Ul° Y J i w« xl~ u J ¢ <Iwa .s ¢ zwwzWUwozxwoiop ¢, sJw>p ~..~ ¢pp~ ¢f<wi >. u~zz ~zJOw ~ZF 'U < i~ ` UU~J<6 O UJ J a~W:~¢»3~¢~ N S<r c» fx J~WV R~N6 UO U 2 JJ ~,~V(Liiiw r nP .Ni m.O+nN.+IVO^ m Nrm /OV aa~^^rl. a r , u ii 0 i ° s f 1 V I ngoJ ~ppP ap ~,~opo n``yy77oN ; m w~iN aN"NOS~yy P ^NN~mm _'ImW I I I rv I I 'I ~~ I I ~pNnr aYw.,~N~mao an.ipo. o YnJ ~oummrN Prp i~ UypL~ rvrJN nP JTPrpNY .n 1YP~ NAP .-.~Y.~.. N°^ :mn HP.'"iGlni .r .~ +I rv r1 '~ '' I ~ n rr r hrN r rr PC Nh Ph' g w W W p W~ w w.i Wa N WN W~ ~ i J r r V .n i rW I ¢ i i y Wr .n ~ ~ enW r Q m rm Q rw _ NW 6 rR miU aN ¢_ WM V WN 6N S J ~LLy~f p V J W~ J P W ~ uW YO YI p N° ~> pp 7 S °w 2 V.n V i o Z46WtttTTT WrW <~ Wt V u~ Wm] rw SW l''n< Ijy aII~¢ J6 wtrUi ~ N '~' SmLO Wp 6 ~ ~ "~¢LL W' ',Y W> °" "`~.`.N ~u~wn~ ..°, zu •i u°. map iii I °~w' w~ pi uz WW Mn i`I o N ~~ ¢p ~¢ .. I ~i aW Ns N~ LN Wp Ne Jr ,wni~Nw ~w1~J z' q~u~~s~oza r is o+ 66<s i u~ uz ~p p `< II II I I p-. iw- m.<- °¢o i WN mw ss i >3~ °LL ¢ I Np 2Z O i+< Z < Z Y¢ ¢LL 6A ouO~~~~JJ N Yw OI'• Or Om ^~O Z;l]~ w ' W nL~KL 1< Jp ¢u~ NO LL P<NN¢ 2¢ ~, ~ I ' [ N ¢ D i iil W ~ li I .` •~ :WS I li ~ I '~ ~L .>. ii ii i~ ~°nN r 'N~ ~. I J<_ Z ^~ r •V_Ip wU ^~a It w 1 a p VWW ¢~ ~I>N <~ JR iL NS wW Jo i <n L F¢ ~' ~¢ ..i off ~.. 'n iir oz o'~ ~ no ¢~F ~,i~z I i x 'i ~<Y w N w Nr ai, uio„"" .~`..". u i iww I, i i ~ iI a~aw'~ n.°~ ~°° o « i°°~i~ ~i Lw uu Ida i OG U¢ NOC J V LJ S 'I pJ_ iI Lp ~¢p Nwr~pN C VL Jw < Y _ FJ Ni+ _ 3 Up : J /. O Vt F t INw J ;i pp (wy{ r wm ww wwr~y~{ mu~pfJ~~6 NZ „ `N LY¢l mtfu SU mmN FL rT Yr U¢YZ¢WF CJrU 2r Z SL VN < Hr VJ VR F¢>¢>~ZI <U ~2G ^r :r Ni~yCJ JJ n1VJ ¢R .~¢ r~I <pfp iZ ¢<Eww r LYO yypO NtN FF~<w '~6L¢SI,OZ SOp ~O¢W66 W66 W¢¢ N ~I ~ » Y„.. r~r .~ryrv aPr-P~JY~Wrv .+nN NYPOa~^ nHTm ~ v~,ryr~Vr NM1N.{ mu~N~+rvYVn ~mVNnJ ~r mOY ~m r~ T U nn Trvmmrr Jlrm ~.NLYTWr Hjmmi+nm mrI'mp VVVVVV i ~I n ^1 11 n w .1 I i i ~ II j i I I I 1 j ~ I I I I I rdPO ~~P in do J :u a.. r y~ r d ~~~•••JJJ ~n i ~ ryq^.o ~IYGMa ~' ~ tnF ~ III 1 T I I u r I z ~~^O.Aryy ~~ ~ ~ OP PPP P i ~ I~ o~N~oo~<m LL<V ~wz ~„ r~ 9J2Nt• V ~ iwlmYY W J M1~J2Q • L.uw 1 U V~OLw2LUr :~LN >uOwW < ry .~ O ~n V RL d J ,2 w 1j1 NI J F ~ ;ry¢~ ~y ulo u noe SK ~ ~w <..O L az n i~l i~~z,o°` ma o ..~zJpOn Y„OW=xV r it <Z~-rO fM Ox i ~OYiu ~wj YYai m i-7.x xxz ~x o ° ~ omin~%oi oml~ i I ~~ ~ II I I~ OJOG OrO ..OmOO J~•,IOm~OVmn ~nOm,)],~Omt~00J s OOS•+O PTO 1J WON[]GOL ~- NOUw t0.']r v.O V'~n0 VU J„`1- UJ ^ ~+GJma mP•! OmliJ u~PeNnW Y , .. .n rv m T.. G T ~• < i mares +a O PP TmVJV00 i PJTJ JOOOOJ OJO.]JOJO JOO J000 JOppJOJJOJ00 maamOQ,amaaaT OaaaaW aaau,aW a0p1b0m Naa V 3 ........,...r.+.~.-,......~~...~...a.r,n..~~.-~r~.r .r r~rrn...r ...~.n.~w.r .rn J J I O_ O_ p,_n +_, N_ _ 2 V {~ L -i O~-, ~+ -'i < •• _ 3 w,a~ ¢ wp's rR OIY ¢ >rv Nm VJ OS w222i w. 1 V 1 t ,) 0,.1 J JV W~f 41¢ V 1 14 YV J 12 ViJ JJ . ZO W VJ iro mom. ~ i axe J, 1 v ~u a~ ~ ..u iw n 4x~ y O OVwJ I 2 ,L Y Jtirv 2~ J4.+O UM rv.~Ow SO Jrvr- O h J,-V JxVVU. V J 0 VSw.n22tw ZUSJ JK u ..,nu ¢°r~ apr~a ,~.,~p6o c :ice diw u~J° v~nJ nOLL Y'v J2rv Y~v LT JKZin !2)lr w.O Y¢2w,naxz .~~...ua .. Nix xi,~n~ V 4C2 62 +»O¢i.+~n66 e .. J,~~., a~~N..omr.xN~. wY ~J,:N av narvaYma i~-G~,wnu 4 z ,~ ~~ o ~ J, K o az , U -2 n _SV_ tt VUC K6 1 L r+w2Y a `•wun yC ,YZV Yrt [02wj/. ut)Y ~ !¢O'J ~ uJdw 40O '~<uI SH jVH Yy'..w uV,= nY~ %S~ Jl LL Q~Y,~Jiw 'Jw •Gw .Q6 aY,~OY JVu~.n J¢¢V~, 06~ .+4,-L¢ ~2Vif'~-•'^~o JVJw~nrL a>-~2 )l YJJ tl.u ,!. a mY~aY aYxaaY Ya¢mui s~m`n~~av iu.., S,I aIV V~JUJ ~ Oli Pin a'nia ai r' ur,0V00 wPP~.wn 'n 9 1 .,o r.oJOOPr-f rvu a,.,a worvuwn,~,oo]oanJOJ ~onmm no.. JoJ~-rv oJru,J -Ja•mrv.t,nor`,no,~'Jwn ~ tl ~(,w u' ,Il p„vnm r.YPP,(,wfrvO J.nY OpryVmOnOnrv m nOmP¢,m JO[, .~ nOnmmm C~ PLO .. N m n .n .~ f~ m f m n rv ~v L tiGP Oryn m.r Y, Y•~WPJ.nn m.e 4, y~0 mP Yf u~wu,NNwNwN U, .p .p40y O,Oy v+yrnFrY S /•00-]J OOJOOOOOOOOJOOOOOOOOJJOO OOOJOOOOpOJO cmmmmwmwmmmammmmmmmmm4~m mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm i ........_...~......~....r.n ...................... ...... ...... ....~.... .. ...... J 1 L L w L a 22 N S 1 w0 _ a ryo _ _ s s 'e zu r. na,., aarcv rca an u` z arc wVP wR LNOw ry222S w22 NSwJU , 6 ~60r-~-~,- wUyrw .,~ Win,-,-°JOp u~rvu u~ +, > W WW,.IW ~IJY W2 ~. p.aJ wi,J-uz La wVJ n rviJ CISn S i~ra. a .w. <iz mau rc env ~.> o.. wu~tJ, Buz _ _ a>° o.', ° rvpv, .~i Jaa ,,.ova w °ziz~ .„Iwo.-.].., V,su'~~:~ a x,,,zr ir° ,°.u zz zapzzJpaua H-'. ,)mom rvoi .,ax ,..a ~., :~Qim iia~ 'ip~ _ i`e Yz'~~~ `'oa; iJ. .J. 00.x•3 J%L7>~72~J¢wK4 ~pw60wv rVT ,r..Y r~u0 ~02wrv rv.7.~.0.'n 2.+•+n 6.i ,l n,n V4 <,c Sl,a VaSZrv/Y V Y •~ r, R .~ K i L " 2 ] V tti i Jut) ~ ,- 6 Y'J ~) 2 r 1o iZw - rc J .. _ z ~z iiw_ __ _ _ i Uw7 2ti ~. .u GnYSJ (a¢ L 4'T t~ RU J'7niu a~nS V,n J ~>Zt] >242~~J~ wLr r2tY t'll in 2 _i 004- 4 lJ !S•+OOZ aJU Z1u ~t>11 •a%J ~'.)K 1( e3iS G2 u~i1 44'r ZZ3J ]2R J',J ~+i.u .n ^JpJUUp24m~1~~. ~3 J~J lJ YJanJV~'22wp RPU U> -, .~n,~..tJU.~o`p+,.,m.iuo ~,...., ,.~w¢wuLL U,".¢ot~J..aai~i ]4 u... wSr ,y y. r,y .Vin l.Vr V Jrv.. rD~ V.1•.- /0 PPJP mOJ mJOOPI OJOOOmy 1-OOmY~00y ~n°OnmoomJdowooono rop..m Y,~p.rv~no z i .. r.riOrvP~m~~oo c+m ..+ou. o~n o~~.: ..n m..mP JO mm~`on'~o rv.Y r T ~n O,nn Yrv w rv w ^ p~ .~ r tl ~ m •1 rvmr~n yn PUwNm Yin ynmP O~+Nm Y,n Lr-m O.+N n1Y ~n .pn mPO mOOJOO.mS000tP]OOOOOOJO~I.JnH ~I~.V+N H.J+ti.+n w.ntiti ti~+n~+~+ m mmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm 31 nrn.rn-~.~w...nn.~.~..lw.+..~r.nn-.n...~.... r...n ...~...r .n .. ...~n.rnn UOmp ~) O Si LL i SZSZ S SL LSS r Z w 1 ,Y -, ,n .-, w,-~ u n n ~ .n .~ r rn < m~ 6 1 ¢K¢ ¢6 ¢¢ LL'R .+¢¢S 6 ¢ wy rixL xx rc xn is .-iii a~oo o~ -p ~ on rc on mo$o ,., p 2 Y ~ i.W <Wi,l ~.~ OUVWV WF > WW O~.I W ~.1VW W ^ZW 62Ymw w « Y J Zi UZ SuZW¢ m ¢ ~UVVU ¢06 O mf p 2V Oy0 ¢ Vu yu ¢ Z~'6 W N ~O¢ m p I _ ~po~p ~s Lsz _ : _ _rtaNpww ..w <o~~o ¢.+.i .-m`s z ~nVYOxLL ,7W ~}IpJp<O ~mIHY~ iV >OU6<2 N ~I SwQ'WH Y2~ ¢u iU 06¢Jr-u~ Y~Owyi <S JJm< u¢7 n3~J~ LJw3¢r¢.~.r~< WI > Ow Nfp w06U4 v~p N 2LLU r~wVJf VF• rydfVppU~7 ZiK GGA 2262K< Jp N~yJySxYjv~ w%LJZ43t~xJ>V~ r-3n +3VSz .n¢~+ OpOVJUOf0~4 w0 <GJOa I LLKLyu ~-Ui¢mJ,n u~N N.{fLKLS62jOrvYN~~J.wG¢.~ySi~nNNrv~- 7L 11YS¢ ~ ,1 S.<ii I i}SS O Ro 6V00 I ¢ o:: .. .n pa¢ ..> .~1¢ u ~¢ i~ 1 O\)J tt 6p Yla _ q - z _LZZp z~n~~ w~z- v m ~ -~. ro~..wpz a ~ ¢fsa z¢sa z¢WV~.. ~.> o.~i: in KYO~ up~-io-.¢ ~o.~uuua n .viu¢ Wu.... ¢~J».. ~i ,n wu~ .x, .ai wi a'.p"n nu, ,n ~,. ,°. uJUJr .u rn2~+ a(~a IUULL ~LL.V~ iii «a ~a,:~nzz .,p~zuuulra,n c .-. iixx- Kn' ~i~zu wYVLL ~nx n.-Y ~+¢zw - i~m~~z fop.. fu'~i <'iaoa up ~:aa .r u.,.,n.-....,uii.~nao~.f.~r:~-+xzz<izuxuunuLLnn _(arcmf¢a Y VP" tPPYV'Y Y~Vn y,T .gym YrJNVP~ V.. P'yL .-Pm~u~OP ,pyYmUFJ I-P~r r .. ... .. ~. mm~+v°~rv r ~~ OOnJNOmnOOJOOJOJOhmOrvm] •JOnmmnO nlm OmOOnOa OON n.+OrvYOU\u\nOJ000PrvryYmJOpJOPrvNwO m.f .rryVOdON aJrvOnNOd mJPO O.+NO~"m.l u\dm OPrynODPmOryJO~-mu\ 9 m^^OO ryrv dPFOONUry m ~ rv ONmmm 21 n a ¢ I PN~ .~ N .+Yn Y nN m 31 mnhNnmmmmmlP~l ldn mlm~IT~Y ~lYrV J.~IIm~mud\h.~aP\d~ ?I LWmmmm^^9mmmmmmwmmmmmmmmmOmOmmmmmmm0mmmmm P P r~.~u Orr r ..., V~ HO _ Fw Y n0 ¢6¢ ~6¢Ut6 #6 6C2 ¢ Rp 2 I U 2 S in .r^Y ~.S 63S°42 m RZ CJOO BOO#(:!J LO .701w0 mW hV~ Y u UW W~nWWOwW mLI WI-WV Vm 6Y O SJO¢ o ~W omw~., ,. Iti ~m r:..4 O \O ~ Vr 12¢ Omw 4wd Vil ~nPN~W r0~ ~udu VO ¢JYT ¢J6ti # ~JI-\- r0 wmm ¢ LL SAP rva Y+\uvooz wm .~¢.3 u:n ¢~ ~°ma~v~u oO6v¢NWK° a~ hrc.'vw °o ~lh-lu u~ii] ai J 'QiwJZ pi~Wa`WS.`Oim'm <°.\o °u~zJFm m,:~~°O<iomo,°.I ,:" ¢Vm~OJIJUP Qati hp Jr~W 606n2n LLtfJ b#NV -"OYpSd r-jdVZJn j=u m°d ~¢m9 Z ~Z 6s~nrw¢uwZLLw O?~+rn nJ V>L JJUI[i J.YJ <m~i¢O°V1i~i< ca ry`Ni 24V'v ~+ ¢¢~n._rn ~O~Y-rvlY m9w,n .r ~n9 n.i u~.~VYN¢<b¢% I J Y 1 wwiV~w u tV V Ct¢1^9 ) Z m ~ ZZZZ60 i ; y Z, ~ ¢2~vry _ ~_ _ _ VJ _ ~~r- :tj2t22 u.OM OL° p +~ i] y 4 V p I- rn ti n w ~ J ~ J W J Iw wL 4x d~~~hu~ 0?)VVJm2U ¢NN tw_-Zb f, ! L UONaTK ZNn J2¢¢Z~JUI ZS¢_J 4K Y39 L IY ^ w t ~+V )tl 9T l I ~:r ¢ ujwF~ZYLph h°V ^~nw r-.J° w ~Saru)P ~2 GirOJOJ902JrL ti¢~tlJm%~V - aF9ua~w..a ¢Ypvpv~NwJaaa2a jiw-r3a Y dG+~ ']dJ wP~ hP~-mN ~+ 4i dOPd hV~ 9dnn GP V ~ .. ~. ~ .n .. .~ .~ r.. .~~. mi] ^ nwW'.umvP JnC^ J /~ • 1 J I- mOJ P ~ POm?0 + O O U Z 3 0 V V U 4 i xi com~o mmmmm R2 J w< Z~ O ~Z r 0 sW 0 is: z ..~~`o uz ,.i iH~ o m o~ams ~z~~w o~°m' U z u... d:: •a~ _4O~ ii .H ro~ /3 i ~ Rs2SS ~°.em~S' ~ '. ~a ' __~_~__ __ 3 ! W =~~ .. .,~e~_ssR r ~ ~ .°C~H .s S 15 ~. 9. °_m - - ~g .. ' .' ~. ~.°~ i3m~ m:t5' Y m x~~ ~°8exm_e ~~, ~~ r =3 __ i ~ & ~~ ~~ csc s[e ~ zz s `.E 9831 ~ _ x L ° - ~ ° ~ t L Y €a~c ~g'~_ =~ a: Y .~~: 5_ ^~~E t.fr:~ ^ieY Y~:=S '~6 a_ g ~~~`.S ':9=_ S_~_e ~'E_ R ° Y. -9y:a :~S ~. ~I ~' f n \ ~~ ~~ e iy ~= g.. ~~ ~~a ~,~a ~o~ '3 ie i~ ss ~! rs €= ~z z~ ~} _~x5~=~~^aa=~~^ =='~cse~~~ a~~_gtl ~~xo7=~~~d~a?max s~csc~acscc:;csas~~tl ~cE B! sc ee~sz c ce ^sd ,?gee c'~~~??ssa~c3a ac~sc cz s?=c„~3_~3z~3~~ e_oe e.so~s^.=s?ea 38gs^' $I~ca °°-'s 3sas?a~s"a~33~ aasaa~a:saseasosa eases sszss s ssasasas csa iiii~~i~i~iiiaa= iiiii iiiii~~~ ii i~~ii iii asasas£gie,~_i~£s_ ssfsss~£iasar~fa~as~s$agszas: 94~a~x@£g~a^Ega?~~~P"s95E~=~~59"x~$k"aaoYsg~9&~s ~§g~~?~Rg~gSg$?gBgRREgE#&SE99~gBg~H?gi?Rfig3A£~g ~§g~gx$~~eRgg%Rggxxagg§##?$~:gggg~Exgx%%xa~@ga 88%%8%88888a88.888888888888888=8888SS88888888 iigiisi~iii~ii~^i~~i~iiiii~i-3iiiiiiiii~~'iii as_assssff_a~i~~sgff_ssssse~savaissPassaaasaaas- 88888888858888.88888%88888888%'=8fi%8fi888fia888S sR~~~g~iiii~~~i~i888$~iiiifi~~aiiiiiiii8~iigi 888°mRg888~}~~g8_8888853~88e%rg8SP8=888%8 sax seams:sasaacammmcammaaa~a_aacacssamaacamama_a:a _a.~ °r. vaarnr_sa=^=m;.e_gzr~=rasp a~^ _e~ev8°_^e=e_e8eS8e388ee-8e9e~ReeR ^e^ vEeS~Se=Be ~8 as '~ ..a~a.aW3~~.3 ~ g-_Y8 ~Jt3f _ 9eyy ~i m~~x..s~x~i~ ~~5'~!~'~--a=~~~cg 9~ ~va~~l~} 95== ~q 4'.__msRem_~8^3°-=~ _8~88fi ~~4~~=~~4o3fiE88~8 ~~ r e .a.~=~rR:F°~~^',_~_ _ R'~=~'~=~~°_RR~p °~_~=R"^^':>X~ S p C[i_ii![!GL[e[ti e_~_3FS.R ° A ibfi~[C[CL~LCL[3r[LC[mmCC[ ~3 - ~ 5^aF~ B ~F--8- ~= ~, [~~ i ___ _. eevoas.s.sa=aaa ~ = -. . e S 3~ 93ss9s3~os3=°°ee'a asc's=--== ' ~ aasaaaaaaESSass aa~ss[asa[s[sassaassasasasa y'~, L88388888888L8L ~ 8L&FYL~888 T.:YC&_8L88>8:&8e 5W ~'~~ ~~x=~~r~9d <aR.{~8 ~ ~~m:~~?=S~'~ ::=v~~5~>°L=gg 8 ~, ea + . ... ° ~~R~$~~RR~~~R~~ ~ ~~R~'R ~L~~R~~~~~mRR88n'~m~~8 1! °_ ~~:i~ReAF~~B~RR$ aS8x8a8.Re ~$x$~~~$m~R$$mem888 ~z H ..:em:>.. .. ~., .., ..a..~ ~>amm>.m--._.s:°°_s~ma-a°a_ ~ ~, assasxsESasssss asasxaaxaasaaaaaasaaaassaa _ ~ `a~°a~°a °s ~~°s~~~~°a°s m °s~°a~°a ~$°s°sff °a~$%°s ~$~°se°a 'E ~e~°s '~~^ ~', ~' __=_esss°ga~o - Sasss~_es_&seSS~s¢s _>'~est~a _ ° ~g _ a°~' _ 888''=84888888888 88aa8888888888E8888Ex8ax8E - ~3Ra~~~$~a~83o~~ m 884?35388R$ad~388~838oe8a8 ____°_88xx88S_ i SYosP ~___ a°P°x8Y8°FRgY8~ _ `a' ~~m A.$.88~F 9m$8mmm mSmm e$BSEmm2$°mA4Sm °m mm$^2 S _ _ . .. ., ., - o . ~_=n-o°~. .'` ~ ' $oe3ffe'-'B ~.nS=a"'e"eee8e3'_k=- ry t ^^ ~a a g9 a ~ S =a is Ne N a~ Y 'd ~Q°E~.~9~ ~ o a~-~ X.y y~/ ° -' YES YY_f ~~° Y~~ cae~Was~c3~ _.. ~x ~ i - --~". W° _ gs :~~~~ W~ ~ = oa=~ .~s~#~a~~ss~~w vvi~ ~6a~~`se~~ngxysg~s ~~m=~? _ ss n x s3°. _ q ~ ~a~? W Y yyyy 't~' ~i ~e~ ~d is sE :~ ss 'as eY .R ~~, i i II ~I i I Ali ', i ~ i ~ i ~~SSF- Ra~~A8.~RR S .~R Fie^~ e~^~^app'~=_~=~~ ~s cesa ^ ess~zz~ec ~¢g st •f as ot~csdaes:aresa =~ _~~~a~3s ^e az = 3i -~ s? z~?R3ar3?3d asss'a ~a 's saB s,s3 ~~~=- 33 .'e ~^z 3a~s's a`ssasas°aa 'sasaa~s:assess sa sa sa za;sa ssslaasas sax~asa il~~i$..E3~$$€it tt it ~E t3~t~ Il~titjQt~,~~#~~~ ~,a ss§g~~cssa~ss sasigssgstass~ia a~sa r~sa~aassas ~^s es~s~a'sc"a,F$sa~'cs~332seda?£`s~~~"s ~z.~~a'-„~E~30's ~~ReA~~I~R~~~g~~8~~'~~~~~j ICRY~~~~8A8~~°L~RBSRR SRS g$R8RgA$~~R$~~9~.Y 8~8XR~~gR~AR&aR~~8R8$~Ry R~RSARRR8 S aBSa-asaasaasesaaassaaaassasaxaesaaasaa%8%88 saaasss€s~ssasscssszssasssssseasseseessseasss 8833%='888888888888888%S8a8%888888888888888888 °°a~<as=~~°°s°a$°s~°s~~~~a~~~~~~s&~°s~~~3~~°a°a&~~a~~~~ _es~~~scsssssaffssssasss~tissssssseoRSSaaesss_, - maamammasszmsassaszacaa:mammmmasmmmsms~m _rv's='?o_'_ " -=`s3saa°s~s~aa=-- _-,__--- _- asaa~,o="~~~~-eeaa°Bas"sass'-?as~aasseso•ae ~~e =~!a"w~~~~~~=$$~"va'~~~~"rY ~3#~a~.v"_~ ~ag3~~~~ 3_ ¢~~s__~ ~ aN_-_ s ~ s_„ ~ a "aN~saa~e~s~~aa'~~=~~ie~-~~3ies~a..=33"v_'aa3~~¥a=~sa s~v~~wv~~Yaa~~N~a ~-as~3 ~~-~x-sg~:~;~~~3~s~x~~a~~ g~ss~s~~a~~~~~~~<~~i~~::~gr~~~a1~31~s~~~3d~~piv~ X39 aoco>e~'4o_~Roe.°+S °~e-ei3R~~-2~Secoc'^-' cTO'eba°a /~ t l t^GiS t LYL ^7tt __ - ~ e__ee _ s sa's e?sa ases a ai YI 8SS88 8 8 R 888 8 8K`=H ' R.°.=t = 8'. ,, . ~'~, 85888 a ~ d PLC S d~°S ~ LY~~ S 8 ~: i9' ~ Smm'' ~ ~ 8 5~.~^. K ~~.5 - 61C~~ S t _ a$ .. ._ _ _ '_ a .~~ ., e.~^^ odds a . _ ., ~R a^.es ~ ^ e .. ..~ ~ e_^. mmme m RI ~ ~ ="8=5 8 5 3 fi8e 5 ee'o3 % ::3Fi 8 8. - ~ dk'' Y'', _°___ g °3 R 8a~ 5_ - `:~ Y` ~°e R .E. ~' 9 og _ .5 _ _ ___ _ _ .. - .. = ~~ =a'a ~- =~~ a= - x -_ge a ~! - _ y _ gW _m =mm m = _ :-~.a- .-. ~ eoo X. $c ~' cue .~. e ~m~ ~~~ j 'j ES~$ ~ ... :~n ~~ V i~~~ ~~~~~ ~W 3~ SS - Y ~Q •'"• S_ r ~_ I~ Y' r °~d~~pp tC ~ _ _ LLs„~a °d Y _,~ i~ w~ y ~ R° WYr a Y: ,~, "'° ~~v~ a ~Y~~k a g:y:~ v. -' F . ~ .. Y ° s i ea ^' ks y d 5u s n . . ~ t1 =EXX W =W k 3 m F N ~~ ' ~ W '~ Y X a a ~y e S 1 ~ ~~ IC `~ 5 X - K 3 ~ ~ % - .~c3e g.-` ~y. 3c_ Y'w~TS ~occ _ c'E 2~a r y 2c ~s x /~ < ~ ie1 E ~ W ~¢j •1 ~~ ~i ~3~ R. e¢i 9~i ~~: __ R _ ~ 4 eR k y 3~g ags s! ~~~ _ , ~W xa $~ r ~a ~, ~~ ~°' =~' a r - `~ / w.. rwr-r.~.rw.. wr. wa. rw. Er. V«-Iw w~r...w. w.e.e. AMISC~SION b1 SRfO1g3K 9E27AM EKNEgl1 I, rTPNS) OF uCEN3f(31 SIIE NO. iM OIN~I+ N Nddk ESrwgS card Iw v ~~~ SEQMI 1q. ]I y ^ ~y.yyl~ San nernard ino ~~.~..r w.v......pr. UN SAI.B G&1ERAL EATING PLACE ~pq 3ti15 IEp ~p/wNNMSr'SST yEA«N 6SwwE Nwpi~e «1Jwp ur] Iwwe ]. I6]AWA d ASMKAM(31 rT Sawa n aweR •~ wdw Sw Sg13 p U.Nr.. oprw Welw 9.w. a rTrusl a 19ANSAC11owA ne iK. me Pe[.TSf. f :J CT ]0 t f]SwSM MpY~ alai's S. lmrwr N Ww-1M1« d SwM 10V06 Foothill Blvd. ar wN ry cr. ua.r Nancno C11CdWOr1 a Y 7] rrnu 3 0. M SIUir« 4MIw4 T. M A~~ Mr4 Sb. TrS~NGw~r 30-83603 C,p. V.aT Yea 4 MNEnE A~Irw fit Mwwe Iww new aIN Swr nwl n... M' I I. [+S~n • `Yd'rrww w Ilwp 9 w r9 ~n w ar«Sww+ rap tlloll N ~SOw~ An M ISp pN3YYM. I]. AplkwM RM bl a« ae arctic ~rti N ww4 Ss~npw Srwwlu .91 Mpw r Mw Pw4M«Iw N • S«nw. ad RI Nwl M .A b ~41pw w ar+ « MMr w Sp aNwSE an N M Sa.IMr N M AkaFNY Enww~ CaaN b. 1]. S1Aa OF GLLNOMIA Cpwrr d.__-._~-~.-.-_-_._-Opu..__-___.- a/lU/tl]___-. u.Y ~r ~ pN+l. M r.~ ~ti. Ww. r. NNrv. ariY. W T. ~I~ F ti w yti.. w yams. .r rvn rv/ w w .Mw+ n~~r. ~~ ~ « «My ~. rr s.pyxw w nary M ~y rv. r ,. ip rr r ~...W ~y ~1W ti .mow N-`I J pp V Y.N M w wu ili nn ti ~nsi ~ ystsw w .F ae • N. T~wv ~ ~yasss~Wyy n Y .~~/ We N. wsy~u In rvNp Y yYw« n n.r . ...+.r Nwy~~..yr ...-.. w...nN r~ yr~ ++.: ~ ww r .r. wo.+. ~. w .~ r N.-~ .~yyy_r ..+ra ...+.~ . - ti ~ ~-... - .~..- ... .. ~ +n F wM+ M rvrlny. Ip v iw sWy ~Ilyxw ..r y.~Pp.a, M whr Y ~Ilr~ 1'^~ .w ~ .wa+~ tiY^r .. w Nytie / /1 1~. NRKAM _ slGN ran _,-~n-1'`-`x"'--i-- --~•-_- _--___a..a:5~-~-__~--~---'---"---._-----_. -MlIC11YlON ~ i~M1/IPIW If. sGTE Of CAGroEMA Caafr N-__-_.ialt_Bec~cdltw.___._----Mw----.___a!<J1nz_-_..__ VrvYr tis a rrpl. w ww wy rvwwn yy~ ~wsM W r .nWn Mnw M ~~ .~ iY STS x~W DIY+.^^. M W~ W~ An rv~rvJ~ .w1n~.w ~ WI: ~)1~ w rvn.N .Wn wNnw n Mrv wyM W~nM1I yyaw N4rv W • a. wyrvn' W ~,~-~Y ~w4M n~ wY~ A M rv-nln n wwww N ~ Wr-, i rv.wM 4+w.. - TW rv~I.r n M I~h w~rvnn -y. y .Y.rv-~ ^rv-w +Yr Yn wlnwl ti _Mrv h •snJS x/s~y n w 0.~rrvnw~ w Wwyy w y~ n.Inr rv-Jr. ~ w AFw~ ~ •M1.n ntiw I x.r.JM, irvi M N rvy~N wM+M~ rrr N ~^Nn.~r inn n. ~.w ~ Nr I -~ rvn ~ ~ti WN. x M Yysyy~r .raNp. w.r ao Go Na A.Ye bloc 1T4 Lev; Fa DspNreM Uw OnIS Arrw3M Q S«wJN nMkp ~ ^ /Nveiwr STw• 9 l l W .__.....____ ...................................._CgaS MAlltp .___ ._--_.__..-.-__.__..-....----....-.- Eaai's laew++rv: /0006 Fm~,wia BtuO. ~MiLM Rt/6p'nY 2~av6: eKNLQ~L L. MM6TtG/AL ~v~rivc aF dnHac.,-r P,POa~eex,/: NG:Q'TH. LO41 Rta1OWT~At a70GTH: MtaMU'nJ{/~gy Eas r : Gawie.~ G,wwau. G1~ar: GsreR.c Cerrcsce~ ~~ ~'i R ~~I Eqw~ ieoob l7MTH/LL ~4VD a~ n Y/ ~1 1~ N ---- C[TI' OF RANCHO CCCA~IONGA STAFF REPORT ,(~ DATE: October 7, 198J '~ _ T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Dave 81er ns, Maintenance Superintendent SUBJECT: Execute Professional Service Agreement for the Design of i the City Corporation Yard at 9153 9th Street and i preparation of plans and contract documents awarded to ~ Pitassi-Dalmau Architects of Rancho Cucamonga for the ~ amount of f118,410 (101,645 plus 10X contingency) to be funded from Capital Reserve (Awarded by Councfl September 16, 1987) RECOMMEND11TIO1: It is recommended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Professional Service agreement with Pitassi-Dalmau Architects of Rancho Cucamonga for the Design of the City Corporation Yard at 9153 9th Street and preparation of plans and contract docunents. Background/analysis On September 16, 1987, City Council awarded the design of the City Corporation Yard to Pitassi-Dalmau. Staff is now submitted the agreement executed by Pitassi-Dalmau for approval by City Council and execution by the Mayor and City clerk. R?spe yisubmitted, / r~_ {~ :dfw a~- ----- CITY OF R.AtiCHO CUCAMONG.A STAFF REPORT ~ J RATE: October ], 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector ~ntG. SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Extension Agreement for Tracts 13058, 13059 and 13060 located in the Victoria Planned Community suMnitted by Willian Lyon REC01/ENDATIpI [t is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subie ct extension agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tracts 13058, 13059 and 13060 were approved by the Pity fmmril nn Aunuct fi 19R7 in tha fnl lnwf nn ammmtc. TR 13058 TR 13059 TR 13060 Faithful Performance Bond: E750,000 $506,000 $480,000 Labor and Material Bond: $315,000 $253,000 $240,000 The developer, William Lyon, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Extension Agreement are available in the City Clerk's Office. Res pe bmitted, ~ ~ RriM:~u. Attachments a3 RESOLUTION N0. V / ~ o~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOMiGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACTS 13058, 13059 ANO 13060 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on September 21, 1987, by Steven Ford as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located in the Victoria Planned Community; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tracts 13058, 13059 and 13060; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Extension Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLYEO by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cal ifornta, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security De and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ,,....c`-cc t, ~~ , HnC.~ C~~. fir'. ~ :T F~ : . - . Ranc"o Cucarrcrya Ca ~ - - , , . _ _ - - - 'i _ __ _ ____ _^ UJi '.ei.Ll.i.CN ~ ~.~ ~ • ....u ar ..J.. -. ~ .o., vv.a ~ L LM yu,~ • ' ~a..c ~~~~ I. 11 ~. _ ' , .v,an N SE f ~. .5 i ~ - C ~~~.., _ ^ Lrp ~W ~ M~am ~~~ _ _ ~`~_ ~~ :- / ~ i .._ ~~_. -_ /'~ `~ ~I~ "'( ^ 1~11~ ~` r v ~.. .. . • - f ,~,~. ..~,m.~ i '- - ~Y `.,, '~..,/ ,.~ ' _ , r .-'= I : , i. ~ ~' : \\ ' ° ~ ., ,~ .. ~ :.. T~: e `. ~ + ~ `` r K Ag~~ 3%~ CITI' OI' ~r~~Cl:~_) Ct~~.:~~:~.)~~~,:~ P1.1~;~"\G L" ~. . ~~~. V i ~ t ! j 'jam -'= ~_'. s :~~ ~ - :r: ,-i ~ ;r ~~ ~.-~ /;~' Jam. - u ,,L,--~ . -ri=- a--; ~ --~ ~ - C - - --,~ ITS:, i ~~~- ~30~j_~7~A ~~q TIT:.,, ~,firw~_"_~1T j•-~ G:; :.,,~ ~ _ - SCALD __~! 1.r. ~ k _ ~1 n,mv nc o w nrn vn nr rn w •~n~rn e STAFF REPORT DATE: October 1, 1987 To: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, Cf ty Engineer BY: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13476 - L AN - u tta o a reso u on co firming a i y ouncil decision made on September 23, 1987, for an appeal of Planning Commission conditions for a proposed residential subdivision located at the northeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Tryon Street - APN 208-111-04 Staff recommends that the Cfty Council adopt the attached Resolution. DISCUSSION: On September 23, 1987, the City Council heard the apDlicant's appeal of cnree ~Jj separ ace conditions or approval. fine accacnea Hesoiucion reflects the Council's decision summarized as follows: 1. The Council continued to require the preservation of an existing magnolia tree; 2, The Council modified the utility undergr•ounding requirement to a payment of one-half in-lieu fees; 3. The Council continued to requf re that the floors of the proposed houses along Hellman Avenue be raised above the 100-year flood level. R es pe ctf submitted,- w~ ~~ ~- / RHM:BH:s Attachment a~ RESOLUTION N0. 87_92 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N0. 13476 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 13476, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Dean Williams, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential subdivision of 37 lots on 9.7 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located on the northeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Tryon Street - APN: 208-111-04 into 37 lets, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on June 10, 1987; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map sub,iect to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and NHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Plannirw~ Commission makes the fallowing findings in regarc to lentan ve Tract no. i~yio and the riap tnereui: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development prcposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable in,)ury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious pu611c health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract wilt not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. Exhibit "A" a~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. TT 13476 - NILLIAMS PROPERTY CONSULTANTS June 10, 1987 Page 2 (g) That this protect will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 13476 a copy of which is attached hereto, sf i- ergapproved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Planning Divi sfon: 1. The construction of a 6' high tammon masonry wall along the pro,ject's eastern perimeter shall be provided. 2. Concrete insets shall be provided in planter cut-outs for street trees along Hellman Avenue. 3. The applicant shall provide details of a 6' high decorative masonry wall (i.e. cap, pilaster) along Hellman Avenue to the City Planner for review and apprgvat prior to issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall provide a landscaping plan for the parkway and areas adjacent to the masonry wall along Hellman Avenue to the City Planner for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 5. Lu:> iu auu ZZ >imii provide minimum i,[uu square feet of lot area. 6. Preserve magnolia tree on Lot 13. House shal] be plotted accordingly. Tree shall be protected during construction per Municipal Code Section 19.08.110. Tree shall be carefully pruned amd maintained per the January 26, 1987 report from Richard P. Johnson and in accordance with proper arborical practices. Engineering Division: 1. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Hellman Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the south side of Tryon Street to the first pole off-site north of the north prg,ject boundary prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. Reimbursement of one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street '; not feasible because the property is presently developed. 2. Notice of fntentton to form and/gr ,join the Lightfng and Landscaping District shall be filed with the City Council prior to recordation of the map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. TT 13478 - HILLIAMS PROPERTY CONSULTANTS June 10, 1987 Page 3 3. The existing structures located on the pra~ect site shall be removed prior to recordation of the final map or an agreement and bond guaranteeing removal of the structures within one-year shall be posted with the City prior to recordation of the final map. 4. The finish floor elevations for those tots located on Hellman Avenue shall be above the 100 year flood level as determined by the final drainage/f load study. 5. The protect shall be protected from flows entering the site from the north in particular flows entering at the northwest corner, to the satisfaction of the C1ty Engineer. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 1987. PLANNING C~OIMISSION Of THE CI)T•Y OF GRANCHO CUCAMON6A I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of June, 1987, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, ENER[CK, BIAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE a9 ia;~~e~~:,Y~ -'~ SS :key ySy oE'+' ~I f.?;yYc~s~~ 6~~1~c fit= e~ceE :__ E"sx ° i3g.41'XeBL~ Yatgy °=x .X~.;y g-~ '€E:~t v a~Ya_jee.Y yg 'a •~~ ~-s e~-e3 -a ``~- __s;s-gsYiVx "~~si ;-a i:isa= jas 5€3g.s a~ at j~~Y~y~~ss~ ^=~=s oaf ?= s~ sq=~! el~;~~ t-?~sa. .:i3 y ~sa~a i~~ .e~r~ 2E~J 'eta€:~ d s 'I ~~ ~~ N~ ~i P `g '~ ~ .~ v SgX<<~6a ~F i 9 N. a=rc y~~~6 YY E ac 5~ 3Y~_~'.o ° ~ ~ ~ e sus s ~ ~~ ~~:~yYelE s ~ \ sp 9 y-i E Y :- ~-e-..,,o~ t a e~ ~ ~~ D~ES.i~~a ~. ,.. ~ E ~~ ~d ~ ~ ~ C ~g r «i i~ 30 h M 0 u 0 d oiYa ~°y. •9' ° •. . a 6 ~o i5 8g,„68t -_ ~g ~_ ~i `~= €geE ?~~=Y'~io Tar.` 'Le ~°t , 5'~. .. 9EVk amaze z=_~~7ti-$ E~:~€~i ~xx ~ e~~' ~i ,;_ ~gJ~~ gig-°, a„;~ e-.~=x-_! ~~q. ~` cYNO :` ~YBg :~_$g~ S~Y~~7`fiy„ P~Yi~i:j ~~5: 2~ ~gg- e2 _EE „~ gYi'O8 :~_i 's3~~` E~=~a`~~~5 ~~$$~~~- "si~~ age ~fi~~€ as - - al - el I i~ i ~~ ^~ •~ :~ ~!'Fe Sfi "s?= sib; e& men ~,` ~Y Eg$ =k%g - `~y `s: t• ~C1 _°~ r- ~ , ~~~ `~ _s Eg ~; _ rM .~ :°9 - EE'- ei'ifi . 4kto -'3 .-<Fo s !yfi iZ° Yt Yfr fs'yE~¢C:Y i2a ~g =- ^4 €Pb fj~~ =t5 ~~ 3g {9~~2i ~~L ..tE `B~ ~y--`gpa t~v =~"a X92 ~i~ d~SL. g~~ Y;g 4~o ~~a d„ iy§si~~x~ F3 ~g ~'~~ _g5 1~~~'Y~~E.: ES ~ ' ~; _ - 3! €-g£ai i~ << :`_iE 89i.5 9':;L fi,~ga ~y~s LL ~~~t" .$Ead¢ .Y .8 fi8~ :, ,,.~ae i F S`~So "..~< a YrS~ ~~g~=~ fi'-~°g - ~.8°E"~ _ _ xa:E gE x 8E ~£ i8hE9`:,ZC~3 E!'Y S ~08." ~ -sE~ La a •4 i~fifi gZfi'a-E _.^~ - °~"y M Les ~ ~ ~St oa fE°'P ¢e~E_; ~~~eE~ g ~gi, ~, p~xQ t" a ax -~ ~z~a$so~'s~g ~ i~a s :ads X~ at' 9fi~5 ~stx~ ~ ES igsz q..~ ~ ;E_ to ~,_~#~`sczza "sxK~= ~~=~ °~` °= "~~ °E zit ~t °~icr;~~~g~ 3sEa~ -~ ~P'~ o ~.. " =~~= ~~ za = 5 ati - $^~i£" x a="s=s is ,e _s 8.~ ~y :S `x Sts wEf'~9 :~xit x. ~'"Kg 'g~R Y~fi Y° Ee. 8~ :~~.~~~.,Y eS C. egg ~~8 £6E Wig" ~~ =~ >`i -"~t9=~~ ~a `~=3E g' S t?x'c: ~~M~~ erv ~~ ~~;=ae~E~~ ~ ~=a "s 1e ~aex M ° _ ~ 9Y~` (' Qom B'E .ZS .{ g "x six- ~ x 8s of Y£ ; & __ ~ Y- fiFfl-, ° ~52 ~~; _~ : -s ~ ;£ g s £ s i_ a ~ ~~ : s=e eta ~' "~ ? ~ .,. i:E $- ' ~ ~ :! ~- ' c ar S ° ~"x m ~%~ ~ : `$ ~z h~ ~E f . ~t 2 Y - 6 = 6C _ F y x~, i9 ~~~ ~_"fr ~ a;S L~: ~e - ~fr~9 .8 '2Y~ ''3'ficyyJ F c ° _ - ~ - - ° ~, ~ s > ~ a ~a~ Shp 9~~~ :~~ ~ 2"' e~.d' ~- "~ ~~_ yg$ 8 ~ ~ xs ~ ~~e~ ~S=Y =~f=f b gr ~g~' x=~~ l~m~a '~' ~ - is=~ °hs5le ads?~ ~_ ~}; ?'3s~ =s~!\i~~li e3 a l~W~' cic"s!~ e'~i~&\ ~ :ca ~ Ni "~ ^i v ~ ~ III "~ "~ W 3 : _ a o'. ggyy 5&: ~ oP YE 5 ~~ ., ~ aY 6$5 ~,%g~ b 8~ k~l A . . y,s %` E. pSE ~~ j l, 3~ ESs :1f ~ Eac 6 fr IIS ~t ES E"_ 3 Ea• go_ ? i Y n ~ 8!~ YYi it:s ~~ a9E ~~ ;FY h8LK ^~`-he ~y ~ APR . ~::~ ~ E ~E bE _eS Y~ ~E =CYig hay. ; p E3i S~~ _ :. Bg kj 'goa- :~ XS` _,h~ i y a Y ~" ; .~ max` ,8 p T" al i E€_ ~ ~et re y txg~ °'~ ~ 3 a;~~ € FF~ 6 "o ' F "= '~~- t2i° Z S 6 l S ! y € C 8 1 t~ ~3f~ .%~ i~- ~&7` Yd=~- . J _ a 1 II ~~~ EB \ ~'~, )I ~~ 5J h ^ ~ \~ 1 1I ~~ i i ~ l ~ i i - 2 R ~' '~ z .- U W 'o 6 ;. a3= ?q~ E8 Y6% a al ~ $ 4 bR;: E aka ~2qa=Y bES - Q _ 3 "E8~ ~kY `95~~h `a' `~ h ~ ~'. V ~ $A~o k~ - e x - L~8` ~ ~` gq E ~ ~-b' '.~ Sei _~~ sa ~ ~ ~ ~ W .:,k _ "a a ° x "sa _~ "say 3i=~' ~'_ 'i ~ a s2 a ~r .- .s ,. 8 Es V k~ s n W "=dab a a~7+ =Cj,E Vii! "' ~•a! Et i t L Y 3~ q ~ ~2E := ~4 kf=? ~tid=_~i ~~~~ ~ 0 II 3 ~ 'i R _I 47 a r- s a : ~ y:S~. ss c3i~ =.:ts'a~C; a 3 s= :4 ~ M tl= ~' to ~_,?~" ?~ - HsY~ ai eH ~i is ~s~l~ F3 v . i~ ~ s?~ = e~€a ~t k 3 ~b=i 3faa rk::= ?j q 53~ = ~il3 i'- ~ ~ iii ~~3~ 3iiq! ~3 3 iii ~ _ aE f ~=sf +:ij ~~~~': li _~ s °~=~ is 3 ! y!~ __: 1 .ae:t ~~ ~~ 3=~~ '~ a:J~1r ~: ~ ~ r~y rII~~ ~i'sgq ~j 6~ ~y~' 3~ 3~~•~ ~~ E ~ ;'s~jd ~3ri "~afe E ~ ~.VL b3 ag i"ks ~s. Y s's ~~ 3, ~ ~:se~ ~`d_ y~k= ~s sa '1~~~ =S -~~~ l ~ s:~~~ ~~si f~=s3 r~ 3O f ~~ ~~ '~ ~ _s=;t °3~44 3 ~`j i3 ~a ~ ~s ~.~ ' 3 ij '~ 33r=s sy~i +rjt~iY F rs ~~ =r~3 s jcta sg ~s y ~i3a~ ~ p~~:r: =~~ i ~Y3 a~ ~qq~=n ~_~ Y~ ° a~Ia_ ~:is 6i_E_~ saa: h a~ zpE i x a°xxY a s c i e e tF °Ii a ~5=~e ?~ ~ s x g :" tx~ Y gY ~Y i ~ l g ~ 8lI , = i ~. hJ ..ie. E ~ x~ ~~ ~ ~~ - g.g. ~~,.:Y ~ y ~ i $= y~ o . : ~ - a ~ ~i e ~ e e -~~ `€ ~i Y _ 68x s c ~ ii e ,~a basr~ ¢ ~~ s v -"i ~~~~ ri ~~i - Ss Y'}~~'E ~ sa a _z ~~~~ ~~ a,: 2 g~ 3iEo ~ fi~ ~ [S 4i kf o} fsE " i~ ~x";6 ~ `- i i# E~ 2 gf 3.1~ f ~s =_c xF;~ - : ~f ~~~ T i !; ~ S~ 9~p. L ~3lx -s ~ Lf 7' 3~ :: _ ~~ ~x . Y _ ss f f .e ~I .I ^~ \I ~ 1,) ~ ^I ^I a~ a" ;i E a? Y of a ~~ _ !° i7, ~ ~ ~~ F{ ~f ` ;i Y E: 55 Cs _ Y~~ .h ~~ !~ ~"e a ;~ S~ ~~~ ;e ~a ~~ rae eY .~~ ~~ ~~e ~a? ~~ ~ iii <~ I wl a I ~I ~I 3if uggh ~v,. Y~ ,f °~ _xL .?# fri >? gp s_ i~ Y~ .xr °sg xx; i~ :~° ~_ s as sis ~., €'~ ~ a~. ~~ D E 3p f: r~_i ~C~ ~iit ~~~ ~I ~I ~ ~~ '~4 ~f~~i gi i^ i ait --i, •_ „f ~ i iz=Y i a-s 3is Vii!°t? yyiY i"~ 7"i Ejwit { eax =~3 3D~i= i~ iii ~ ~ _g3'_:Y mi -nf f~i gaac= i~ '~'! Yf; ii~'g i. jiI pia ifQa ~~ -zf ii~ ~r~~: ~ii k- i~~i_ C- .,r~ t1~ ~SFf?~ .~I Wi- a mi 0 z w 0 a~ s~ ~: ax x€ ~3 e~ as is ~~ sY= £e fix ~I e :fig a r~yy~i h~s~ ~ ~- ib i4"6' ey xt~3 Ye ~' ~~~~~ ~~ ke"~Q ~~ :~_~ EE YS~ :F ~~~;~ sa e~n~ ~Y 'hYC .. ~~ ?:Q:z cra -- o li'~ h w°i ~ ;~y ~ si~ _ji_ ~ ~I~ ~ ~_ ~ a w si~i ~4 ~s~ i~ .~}~ x~ i~ i=n S - B f7~ 7 b s;`~ i a ~ z ~ § - ~ ~ ~ i ~ ;~5 S:~ h 9. 3~ .~; a h: s~ - ~. B4 ~: y .x~~ ~ ~Y 3~ =h ~ f ; : , ~ ~ :ilk ~~ 3e ii iK,g ~a i ti S~ - b~fi, - tT ~= i ~. i ! ai e[;i x - .h i s' s ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~.~ e= s ( iii eY y ~ 9 j hY 2 ~ 8~` ~gf S e_g _~r e e yY Y Y F . Y ~ deg <<_ ss l 9 ~ t t r s ec~ ~~~w -7h -`~'€ ~i =r gc~ ~s z x x :~~ ae~ Y:a ., RESOLUTION N0. 8 ~ - sd~/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY aF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORN UI, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP, NUMBER 13476, TO PERMIT A CUSTOM LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION ON 9.7 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND LOCATED ON THE NORTHERST CORNER OF HELLMAN RVENUE ANO TRYOfI STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS AND SUPPORT THEREOF A. RECITALS. (i) LOU BERKOMITZ, on behalf of Mest Venture Development Company, has filed an application for approval of Tentative Tract Map, Number 13476, described above in the title of this Resolution. Hereafter in this Resolution, the subiect Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as •the Tentative Tract." (ii) On ,lone 10, 1987, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the subject matter of the Tentative Tract and, following the wnclusfon of said hearing, adopted their Resolution No. 87-92 thereby approving the Tentative Tract. (iii) The applicant has filed a timely appeal of the Tentative Tract approval represented Sn sold Resolution No. 87-92 on the basis of three (3) Conditions contained in said Resolution. The Conditions appealed are described as follows: a. The requirement that the developer preserve an existing magnolia tree (Condition No. 6 -Planning Division); b. The requirement that the developer underground the existing overhead utilities along the pro,Ject frontage on Hellman Avenue (Condition No.l - Engineering Division); and c. The requirement that the developer construct the finish floor elevations of the lots located on Hellman Avenue above the one hundred (100) year flood level (Condition No. 4 - Engineering Division). (iv) On September 16, 1987, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the subject matter of the appeal of the Tentative Tract and, on said date, conclude4 the public hearing. (v) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 8. RESQLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the City Coon cit of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 37 RESOLUTION PAGE 2 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resoiution are true and correct. 2. This Councfl hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental quality Act of 1910 and wncurs with the issuance of the mitigated Negative Declaration issued on June 10, 1987. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented Lo this Council during the above-referenced September 16, 1987, hearing, including written staff reports, the minutes of the above-referenced June 10, 1987, Planning Commission meeting and the contents of Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-92, this Council specifically finds as follows: a. The Tentative Tract applies to property located on the northeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Tryon Street within the law resfdential district and is currently vacant and unimproved; b. The property to the north, east, south, and west of the subject site is within the law residential district and is currently Smproved with residential dwellings. c. The Tentative Tract contenplates the subdivision of the subject site into thirty-seven (31) custom residential lots. Such a subdivision as contemplated is permitted within the low residential district and such a dwelling unit density as contemplated fs Dermitted pursuant to the density standards of the Development Cade of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; u. iim re yuireneni vi rianrn ng ~ommrssion Hesol ution No. 8/-9't that the Developer preserve an existing magnolia tree (Condition No. 6 - Planning Division) continues to he an fmportant and necessary condition in furtherance of the granting of the subject Tent ati Ve Tract application. The re quirenent is consistent with the intent of the tree preservation Ordinance No. 276 and is considered significant to maintain the historical character of the City. e. The requirenent of Planning Commission Resoiution No. 87-92 that the Developer underground the existing overhead utilities along the project frontage on Hellman Avenue (Condition No. 1 - Engineering Division) is modified to require the payment of one-half in-lieu fees in accordance with standard policy as suggested by the Developer, because (1) the utilities off- site from the project site will not be undergrounded in the foreseeable future since the adjacent properties are already developed, (21 it is unlikely that the Oz:zloper will be able Lo new ver reimbursements from future developments for one-half the cost the undergrounding, and (3) the undergrounding re quiranent would place an undue hardship on the current property avner. f. The requirement of Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-92 that the Developer construct the finish floor elevations of the lots located 3S RESOLUTIaI PRGE 3 on Hellman Avenue above the one hundred (100) year flood level (Condition No. 4 - Engineering Division) continues to be an important and necessary condition in furtherance of the granting of the subject Tentative Tract application. The requirement is mandated by City Ordinance Nu. 240 based upon Federal Emergency Management Agency regulations and is considered essential to protect the future hares from flood waters. g. The subdivision request as specified in the Tentative Trott will not contradict the goals or objectives of the General Plan or Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and would not promote a detrimental condition to the persons and properties in the imnedi ate vicinity of the subject site. 4, Based upon the substantial evf den ce presented to this Council during the above-reference public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Tentative Tract is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; b. The design or improvements of the Tentative Tract is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; c. The subject site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; u. Tile tiesign or cne proposed subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or avoidable irtlury to humans or wildlife or their habitat; e. The Tentative Tract is not likely to cause serious health problems; and f. The design of the Tentative Tract will not conflict with any easanent acquired by the public at large, non of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Council hereby approves the Tentative Tract subject to all of the Conditions set forth fn Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-92 (a copy of which is attached hereto and marked as Exhibit "A") with the specific exceptiun that Condition No. 1 - Engineering Divi lion shalt be replaced to read as follows: a. An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future under ounding of the existing overhead utilities (electrical and teleconmunfc~tions~located on the project (east) side of Hellman Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to recordation of the final Map, the fee shall be one-half the City adopted 39 RESOLUTION PAGE 4 unit amount times the length fran the centerline of Tryon Street to the north protect boundary. 6. This Council hereCj provides ratice to LW BERKOMITZ as a general partner with hest Venture Development Company, that the time within which tudicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 7. The City Clerk is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit certified copy of this Resolution, by Certified Mail, Return Receipt ReQuested, to LOU BERKOMITZ at his address as per City records. YO ---- CITY OF RANCHO CI;CAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~~ DATE: October 7, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel Map 10884 located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Base Line Road submitted by Sycamore Investments [I RECONlEN011TI0N It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 10884 and authorizing the City Clerk to cause same to record. Analysis/Backgroun6 Parcel Map 10884 was approved by the Planning Commission on August 1L, 198/, for the diVlSlon of 2.b acres of land Into Z parcels in the Mei ghborhood Commercial Development Oistri ct located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Base Line Road. Frontage public improvements have been constructed in con~un ction with development of Parcel Map 9079. Respe y submitted, X RHM: Attachments y/ RESaur[oN no. 0 ~ - S~ °L A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUiCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 10884 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MI1P N0. 10884) WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 10884 submf tted try Sycamore Investments II, and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Base Line Road was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 10884 is the final map of the division of land approved as shavn on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the reQuirenents esta611shed as prerequisite to approval of the final map Dy the City Councii of said City have now been met. NOW, THEREFORE,~BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 10884 be and the sane is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for]reco~rd. --' 7 l ''~ yet -_ _- - z ~~. W 'Q I Bb 00' t3:1' g~9d 0 e ~4a 19' fl ~5 Q ~T '~ I T ff Q r~ NOT °~ =i.RT .~' ~~ PgRCtL ~11DAG) ~, IIT =~' PJ45E LiNF_ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA En15T pKAIN•{B 1 fi'MT PAI2G GL 2 ~ ,,~ (1'100 AC~~ y. ~- I 73a b:' _ _ Koo.o N Iz~: TI'17.E; ~ , ;ae~ &NGINEERING DIVISION EXFIIBIT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ STAFF REPORT ~~ ~~. a ~ DATE: October 7, 1987 O O TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council ~ ~ Z V > FROM: Jack Lam 1977 BY: Olen Jones, Redevelopment Analyst SOBJECT: Approval of the formation of a Technical Committee to assist in the development of Fire Protection Facilities RECOMMENDATION: Approve the formation of a Technical Committee to assist in the evelopment of Fire Protection Facilities. BACRGROUND: In April, 1987, the Agency approved a Master Plan for the development of Fire Protection Facilities, which outlined [he needed facilities and set a schedule for the acquisition and construction cf those facilities. ANALYSIS: In order to proceed with the development of the needed Fire Protection facilities, it is necessary that a Technical Committee be formed to work with the architect in the space planning and design of the facilities. The purpose of this committee is to provide guidance to the architect on the nature and functions of each facility, based on an understanding of the Fire District needs and the Redevelopment Agency budget constraints. It is recommended that the Committee be composed of an Agency staff member, representing the financing of the facilities, a Planning Division staff member, representing the City's design concerns, a Fire District staff member, representing the needs of the users of the facilities, a Fire District Board member, representing the interests of the Fire District, and the Chairman of the City's Public Safety Commission, The Chairman of the Public Saf et;~ Commission has a special interest in these facilities, as these affect community safety. The inclusion of the Chairman will enhance the City's efforts towards promoting increased community safety. This committee will be advisory in nature only. Once a program and design have been developed, the plans will be submitted to the City for all the normal processing. Respectfully submitted, 1 T /,l (~{I/~ I [ACA//Ibl _Jac~La~h~~ICPI~ --~ community Development Director yy CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT c ~d~ -rn z o ~ F ~ Z UI D 1977 DATE: October 7, 1981 T0: City Council FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman City Manager SUBJECT: Approval to Amend Engineering Division Budget to Upgrade a Vacant Assistant Civil Engineer Position to a Associate Civil Engineer Position in the Traffic Management Section RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the vacant Assistant Civil Engineer position in the Traffic Management Section of Engineering be upgraded to an Aa suc ie ~e i.ivii Engineer poslnoo, When the Engineering Division budget was prepared, it was planned to have an Associate Civil Engineer in the Operations Group of the Traffic Section. Originally, this position was intended to be funded from an Office of Traffic Safety Grant. The City was unsuccessful in receiving this Grant. !t is important the Traffic Management Section not remain understaffed due to the number of projects being undertaken this year. The City will be installing or upgrading nineteen traffic signals or traffic control projects this year. In addition to these projects, current staff time is taxed by necessity to provide support to the Public Safety Commission. This proposal will have no impact on the budget due to salary savings experienced this year. Most of the 26 positions to be added this year to the Engineering Oiv i; ion were nui filled until the latter part of August and the beginning of September, while the positions were budgeted from July 1, 1987. If you have questions or concerns regarding this matter, feel free to contact me. LMW :baa yS ---- CITY OF R,>,NCH() C1;CAA10NG.1 STAFF REPORT ~~,,~~~~ O4TE: October 7, 1987 ~T~ I T0: City Council and City Manager i FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Duane Baker, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: Rdoption of a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program ~I (OBE) i RECOMIENd1TI0N: City Council should adopt the resolution adopting the policy statanent and commitment for an active Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) Program. Background/Analysis Federal regulations require recipients of Federal Highway Act (HEWN) funds to have an approved DBE program as outlined by Code of Federal Regulation 49CFR, Part 23. A DBE is a policy whereby the City es ta6lishes a goal for awarding contracts on federally funded jobs to a certain nunber of minority and warren owned businesses. The goal for our City is 10X. Since the City does receive and administer HFWA funds, we are required to update the DBE policy annually if receipt of federal funds is to continue. R es pe fvTNy submitted, ~; r i / Y EDIIBIT 'I' CITT OF RANCID CUCARDR611 DISADYAIRA6ES BUSINESS PRDGRAII (DBE) AID IIDIEM-OIRIED BUSIRESS EMIEIiRISE (1!E) I. POLICY STATEMENT It is the policy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to utilize Disadvantaged Business Enterprises 1n all aspects of contracting to the maximum extent feasible. This policy is fully described in the City's Disadvantaged Business Program which constitutes City policy and a coawiUaent to substantially increase Disadvantaged Business and Noman-Owned Business Utilization. This policy includes any program or facility funded wholly or in part by any U.S. Department of Transportation modal element, through CalTrans. The City, its contractors and subcontractors, which are the recipients of Federal-aid funds, agree to ensure that disadvantaged business enterprises have the maximum opportunity to participate 1n the performance of contracts a~ subcontracts. In this regard, the City aad all of its contractors and subcontractors will take all reasonable steps in accordance with 49 CFR 23 to ensure that disadvantaged business enterprises have the maximum opportunity to compete for and perform contracts. enn s tout, yor y9 II II! Disadvanta ed Business Enter rises (DBE and Women-Owned Business nterpr se a son cer Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer, is the D/WBE Liaison Officer for the City and shall report to the Director of Community Development. Mr. Maguire will be assigned such staff as is necessary to fully implement the provision of 49 CfR Part 23 and such other D/MBE programs as may be required. The reporting structure and duties of support staff are shown on Attachment A. Duties of the D/MBE Liaison Officer The D/MBE Liaison Officer shall develop, manage and implement the D/WBE Program on a day-to-day basis. The Liaison Officer shall: * Develop and carry out technical assistance programs for D/MBE's. * Arrange solicitations, time for the presentation of bids, quantities, specifiations, and delivery schedules, so as to facilitate the participation of D/MBE;s. Nhere such changes are found necessary to increase D/MBE utilization, they will be made in consultation and cooperation with the functional unit involved. * Provide guidance to D/MBE's in overcoming barriers, such as inability to obtain bonding or financing. * Carry out information and communication programs on contracting opportunities in a timely manner. Programs shall be bilingual where appropriate. inves iiya ce the services oirered by oanks ownea ana contra n ea oy Disadvantaged business and Women Business Enterprises. Ensure that, where feasible, the City utilizes said banks. * Utilize a listing of D/MBE's certified by CalTrans. Said listing to be made available to all bidders on City projects. Such listing will include the following information: Wame, address, telephone number, ethnic and/or sexual ownership, type of work performed by firm. * Approve any removal and/or substitution pf a Disadvantaged or Women Business Enterprise during contract performance. Prior to approval of substitution and/or removal of D/MBE, prime contractors will be required to prove performance of good faith efforts to replace the D/MBE with another eligible D/MBE. * Establish overall goals for both disadvantaged and woman-owned business enterprises. Goals shall be evaluated on October 1, of each year and adjusted as necessary. * Establish individual project goals for disadvantaged and woman- owned business enterprises. Ail projects will be evaluated for the appropriateness of goals. y S' * Maintain such documentation as is necessary to verify the City's performance of the above activities. IV. Establishment of Overall 0/WOE Goat The City will establish an overall goal forits use of D/MBE's. This goal will be updated annually as of October 1 of each year. The City's overall goal and the methodology used to determine the goal for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1987, is shown on Attachment B. Y. Contract Goals A71 projects receiving U.S. OOT funds will be evaluated for the appropriateness of D/WBE goals. Projects will be evaluated and goals established, utilizing the following criteria: * Size of project. * Dpportunities for D/MBBE's as subcontractors, vendors, suppliers. * Disadvantaged. population of county in which work is to be performed. * Existing/D/MBE goals being utilized in the project area by other State, Federal or local jurisdictions. * Availability of D/WBE's. * Past experience on projects similar to the the project being evaluated. * Such other factors as mAy effect the utilization of D/WBE's. Each project will be evaluated in conformance with the above criteria. Complete documentation will be retained of every project so evaluated. Contracts which do not contain specific goals wil contain the following provision. 1. 'fo~~l~icy -.. It is policy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that drs~taged business enterprises as defined in 49 CFR Part 23 shall have the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts financed in whole or in part with Federal funds under this agreement. Consequently, the D/W8E requirements of 49 CFR Part 23 apply to this agreement." 2. "D/NBE Obligation. (t) The recipient or its contractor agrees to ensur- a that disadvantaged business enterprises as defined in 49 CFR Part 23 have the maximum opportunity to participate in the perfomance of contracts and subcontracts financed in whole or in part with Federal funds provrded under this agreement. In this regard, all recipients or contractors shall take all necessary and reasonable steps in accordance with 49 CFR Part 23 to ensure that disadvantaged business Ti enterprises have the maximum opportunity to compete for and perform contracts. Recipients and their contractors shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of DOT-assisted contracts." 0/WBE use on projects without goals will be reported to the Liaison Officer and will be included in the City's reports to CalTrans and to the appropriate DOT element. D/WBE use on such projects will be counted toward attainment of the overal goal. YI. Public Notification At the time of submittal of this program to the U.S. Department of Transportation, the City will publish a notice in both disadvantaged and majority local media. Said publication shall: * Announce the City's overall goals. * Inform the public that the goals and a description of how they were set, are available for public inspection fora period of 30 days. . * Inform the public that both U.S. DOT and the Ctty will accept comments on the goats fur 45 days from the date of the notice. * The notice shall advise interested parties that comments are for informational purposes only. In addition to the foregoing, interested disadvantaged and majority contractor orgainizations will receive direct mailings of UJa wwyleLe pruyrmu with a reyuesi. chat they proviae written comments to the City on this program. VII. Contract Procedure This plan shall be implemented through the utilization of a contract special provision which is attached hereto as Attachment "C". These procedures require bidders to submit the names of 0/WBE subcontractors and suppliers, a description of the work each is to perform or material to be furnished, and the dollar value of each D/WBE subcontract. VIiI. D/WBE Notification Projects will 7e advertised in local newspapers and minority focus newspapers when possible. these ads will include reference to D/WBE r2qui rements and will indicate DBE and WBE goals set by the City. Dj WBE assistance centers will receive notification of projects scheduled to be advertised. Assistance Centers, Mi norl ty Business Development Centers and Program Management Centers will receive complimentary plans and specifications for projects within their geographical area of respansibili ty. ~~ IX. Disadvantages and Woman Owned Banks The City of Rancho Cucamonga will encourage all contractors to use the services of banks owned and controlled by minorities or women. This encouragement will be disseminated during pre-bid and pre-construction conferences (ff scheduled) and the contract specifications. Selection Criteria for Contracts with D/WBE Goals Every contract containing D/WOE goals shall be evaluated by the 0/WBE Liaison Officer or his/her designee to ascertain bidding contractor's efforts to attain the D/WBE goats. The award of any project with D/WBE goals must be concurred with by the D/WBE Li of son Officer or his/her designee before said contract may be awarded. Should there be disagreement between the City's functional units concerning contractor's efforts to attain contract goals for D/WBE participation, the matter shall be referred to the Liaison Officer or his/her designee, for final determination. Competitors that fail to meet the D/WBE goals and fail to demonstrate sufficient reasonable efforts shall not be eligible to be awarded the contract. Any contracts that contain D/WOE goals, pursuant to this policy, will be monitored on an ongoing basis by project personnel during the course of construction. The D/WBE Liaison Officer is to be immediately advised of any circumstances wherein contractor compliance with the D/WBE provision is questionable. The contractor shall submit a final report for each project with D/WBE goals which includes total payments to the prime contractor as well as payments the prime contractor has made to D/WBE ~uu~mdi uu vu r~, vendurs anti suppiiers. if the report inai ca tes the prime contractor has not achieved the project goals, project personnel shall attach an evaluation, in narrative form, of the reasons for failure to attain the goals and any corrective action that was taken. Prime contractors will be required to notify City personnel of any situation in which regularly scheduled progress payments are not made to D/WBE subcontractors, vendors or suppliers. XI, Set-Asides If determined necessary by the D/WOE Liaison Officer, the City, wilt consider the use of 0/WBE set-asides as a tool to acht eve the overall City goal. XII. Ccuntin O/WOE Tar tic iuants The City, its contractors, and subcontracators shall count D/WBE participation in accordance with the provisions of Section 23.47, Title 49, of the Code of Federal Regulations. 5,~.. XIII. Records and Reoorts The D/VIBE Liaison Officer shall maintain such records, and provide such reports, as are necessarey to ensure full compliance with this policy. Such records and reports shall include, as a minimum, the following information: * Awards to D/dBE's. * Awards to majority contractors. * Final project reports concerning D/NBE Utilization. * Such other data as is needed to fully evaluate the City's compliance with this program. The D/NBE Liaison Officer shall submit reports to CalTrans and to U.S. DOT elements as required. These reports will include: * Number and dollar value of contracts awarded. * Number and dollar value of contracts and subcontracts awarded to D/WBE's. * Description of general categories of contracts awarded to D/fR1E's. * The percentage of the dollar value of all contracts awarded during the quarter which were awarded to D/VBE's. indica cion as co the ezcenc of which the percentage met yr exceeded the overall City goals. * Reports shall be broken down separately by ethnic grouping and sex. XIV. D/W8E Listing The City of Rancho Cucamonga will utilize a listing of firms certified by CalTrans to be Disadvantaged Businesses in accordance with the DOT Order. This listing will be developed and maintained in accordance with Sections 23.51, 23.53, 23.55, and 23.87 of 49 CFR. This listing shall be made available to propsec ti ve Contractors at no charge. Contractors will be permitted to rely upon the authenticity of firms i'iited 'in tilii Directory. XV Complaints Any complaints received by the City concerning this program will be investigated by the City. The City wilt endeavor to resolve said complaints within 90 days of receipt of the ~/NBE Liaison Officer. The appropriate DOT element and CalTrans will be furnished a copy of the complaint and mdy be invited to participate in the investigation/resolution. The DOT element and Cal Trans will receive a complete investigative report on the conglaint and may be requested to concur in the proposed disposition of said complafnt. Contractors will be directed to notify the City of any complaints they may receive concerning this program. ATTACHMEiT "A" CITY IYtlA6ER Duties Lauren Wsserfm Insure that the D/WBE is implemented as adopted by the City Council. COIL OEVEL071F.11I AfA. lack La L1Al5O1 OF:CfR I Dnries per cenr inn iTT of Fnt i~•• CItt EN6IIEER Statement Mnsell N. Fage;re F1IELIC iIOPo(5 ENEIIEERa I i SR. CIb'iL EN611EERs I I ~~C'TY E16T I I SA. CPVI~LEFC.Ni651fEEIa 1 IgIN1NIN1EWY1CEi.a ~ISTAUCi1011 MYYIff1F/1T 1AAFFIC 1 iiAfF JELEfsli;01 STAFF OELEEAi(01 9iAFF AElE6Ai(Ol --,_._. STAFF OEIEEAT:tTN I__..._. _ STAFF Of:EEATIOI ~ . 9F,e is _o~:r. '`ricrr in insurnq contrac tor coral Lance t9rough `,~k;n; irate r: rows a;:d mak inq field obse rvat tons a;:d keeping ,.. . ~,;.'-ra m.f r: ate s. ATTACHMENT "B" The City of Rancho Cucamonga has set the following annual goals for participation in pro,jec is receiving U.S, DOT Funds by DDE and HBE contractors for the period of October 1, 1987, through September 30, 1988. DBE: 10$. ATTACHMENT "C" SPECIAL PROVISIONS 2-1.02 DISADYANTAGED BUSINESS. This project is subject to Dart 23, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations entitled "Participation By Minority Business Enterprise In Department of Transportation Programs." Portions of the Regulatons, including portions of Subpart D which defines Disadvantaged business ( DB) and includes other provisions, and the Regulations in thier entirety are incorporated herin by this reference. Bidders shall be fully informed respecting the requirements of the Regulations and the Department's Disadvantaged Business (DB) and Women owned Business Enterprise (WBE) programs developed pursuant to the Regulations; particular attention is directed to the following matters: (a) A DB or WBE Must be a small business concern as defined pursuant to Section 3 of U.S. Small Business Act and relevant regulations promulgated pursuant thereto; (b) A DD or YBE may participate a5 a subcontractor, joint venture partner with a prime or subcontractor, or vendor of material or supplies; (c) A DB or WBE joint venture partner must be responsible for a clearly defined portion of the work to be performed in addition to satisfying requirements for ownership and control. The DB or WBE joint venturer must submit either Schedule B of the Regulations or California Department of Transportation Form CR5A, Information for Determinging Disadvantaged Business and Womean Owned Business Enterprised Joint Venture 2ligibilTty"; (d) A DB or WBE must perform a commercially useful function, i.e., :61.. Cam.. t6, nl~nn of ~1C*~nf~ P1P .oust ` ~p~ _.,___ moot of the work and~must carry out its responsibility by actually performing, managing and supervising the work: (e) Credit for a OB or WBE vendor of materials or supplies is limited to 20 percent of the amount to be paid to the vendor for the material unless the vendor manufactures or substantially alters the goods; (f) Credit for trucking by DBs and WBEs will Se the amount to be paid when the DB or WBE trucker will perform the trucking with his/her own trucks, tractors and employees or when a DD or WBE trucking broker had signed agreements with OB or WBE truckers assuring that the trucking will Se performed by OB and WBE truckers, respectively. Credit for trucking by DBs and WBEs will be limited to 20 percent of the amount paid in ali other cases. (g) A DB or WBE must be a certified D8 or WDE on the date bids for the project are opened before credit !nay be allowed toward the 06 or WBE goal. The Department's DB and WBE Directory identifies DBs and WBEs which have been certified. Others may also qualify for certification but must be certified before bid opening. The DB and WBE directory may be obtained. (h) Noncompliance by the Contracator with the requirements of the regulations constitutes a breach of this contracat and may result in termination os the contract ar other appropriate remedy for such breach. sb (i) Bidders are encouraged to utilize services offered by banks owned and controlled by minorities or women. 2-1.03 DB and MBE GOALS FOR THIS PROJECT. The City has established the following goals for disadvantaged businesses (DB) participation and for woman owned business enterprises (WBE) participation for this pro,)ect: Disadvantaged business (DB) percent Woman owned business enterprises (WBE) percent It is the bidder's responsibility to make a sufficient portion of the work available to subcontractors and suppliers and to select those portions of the work or material needs consistent with the available DB and 418E subcontractors and suppliers, so as to assure meeting the goals for DB and WBE participation. SECTION 3. SUBMISSION OF DB AND NBE INFORMATION, AWARD, AND EXECUTION OF CONTRACT 3-1.01 GENERAL. The bidder's attention is directed to the provisions in Section 3, "Award and Execution of Contract," of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions for the requirements and conditions concerning submittal of DB and NBE tnformwtion, award, and execution of contract. It is the bidder's responsibility to meet the goals for DB and NBE participation or to provide information to establish that, prior to bidding, the bidder made good faith efforts to do so, as outlined in Appendix A "Guidance Concerning Good Faith Efforts" set Forth in Sxtion 6-1.04, "Participation by Minority Business Enterprises in Subcontracting," elsewhere in cnese speci ai pr•uvisiwu. It is agreed that the bidder's security furnished under the provisions of Section 2-1.07, "Proposal Guaranty," of the Standard Specifications shall also be security for the bidder's compliance with the OB and WBE information requirements in Section 3-1.OlA, "DB and WBE information," herein. [t is further agreed that if the bidder fails to submit the required DB and WBE information by the times specified in said Sec tf on 3-I.OIA, such failure shall 6e deemed to be a failure to execute the contract and shall be ,lust cause for the forfeiture of the security of the bidder. 3-1.OlA DB and WBE tNFORM4T [ON. The apparent successfui bidder (low bidder) and the seccnd low bidder shall submit DB and WBE information to the office at which bids were received no later that following bid opening. Other bidders need not submit an information dole;s requestad to do so by the Department. When such request is made, the D6 and WBE informatiion of such bidder shall be submitted within 5 days, unless a later time is authorized by the Department. The bidders DB and WDE information shall establish that the D8 and 4BE goals will be met or that a good faith ef~ort to meet the goals Das peen made. Bidders are cautioned that even though their submlttal indicates they will meet the stated DB and VIBE goals, their submittal should also include their good faith efforts information along with their DB and WBE goal information to protect their eligibility for awaard of the contract in the event the Department, in its review, finds that the goal has not been met. The information to show that the DB and NBE goals will be met shall include the names of DBs and MBEs to be used with a complete description of work or supplies to be provided Dy each and the dollar value of each such DB and WBE transaction. (Note: DB and MBE subcontractors fior signal and liyhting items, if there are such items of work, must have been named in the bid - See section entitled "Subcontracting" of these special provisions). The information necessary to establish the bidder's good faith efforts to meet the DB and MBE goals should iclude: (1) The names and dates of advertisement of each newspaper, trade paper, and minority-focus paper to chich a request for ~ and NBE participation for this pro,iect was placed by the bidder; (2) The names and dates of notices of all certified DBs and MBEs solicited by direct mail for this proiett and the dates and methods used for following up initial solicitations to determine with certainty whether the DBs or MBEs were interested. (3) The items of work for which the bidder requested subbids or materials to be supplied by DBs and WBES, the information furnished interested DBs and NBEs, the plans, specifications and requirements for the work, and any break down of items of work Tnto economically feasible units to facilitate DB or WBE participation. Where there are DBS or WBEs available for doing portions of worknormally performed by the bidder with his own forces, the bidder will be expected to make portions of such work available for DBS or WBES to bid on. (4) The names of DBS and NBEs who submitted bids for any of the work indicated in (3) above which were not accepted, a summary of the bidder's discussions and/or negotiations with them, the name of the subcontractor or supplier that was selected for that portion of work, and the reasons for the bf dder'~s choice. If the reason for re,iecting a DB or WBE 61d was price, give the price bid by subcontractor or supplier. Since the utilization of available DB's 8 WBEs is expected, only significant pr+ce differences will be considered as cause for rejecting such OB or MBE bids. (5) Assistance that the bidder has extended to DBs and WBEs identified in (4) above to remedy the deficiency in their subbids. ~~ (6) Any additional data to support a demonstration of good faith effort, such as contacts with DO and NBE assistance agencies. 3-1.018 AiIARD OF CONTRACT. The award of contract, if it be awarded, will 6e to the lowest responsible bidder whose proposal complies with all the requirements prescribed and who has met the goals for DD and NBE participation or has demostrated, to the satisfaction of the Department, good faith effort to do so. Meeting the goals for DD and NBE participation or demonstrating, to the satisfaction of the Department, good faith efforts to do so is a condition for being eligible for award of contract. ~q RESOLUTION N0, p 7 - S~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A POLICY STATEMENT AND COMMITMENT FOR AN ACTIVE DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISES (DBE) PROGRAM HFiEREAS, Federal regulations require recipients of Federal Highway Act (HFNA) funds to have an approved Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program; and NHE REAS, each local agency who administers FNNA projects must prepare a DBE program for approval by the State of California/Department of Transportation (CalTrans); and NHEREAS, annual overall goals for Disadvantaged Businesses must be established, documented and updated annually. NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: Section 1: It is hereby found and determined pursuant to Cade of Federal egu a on 49CRF, Part 23 and the definition contained therein that the City adlopt the Policy Statement and Commitment for an active Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE} Program as set forth in Exhibit "1" attached hereto and made apart of this Resolution. Section 2: This Resolution shall superceae Keso iucion o5-iui wii; ui establishers-6isadvantaged/Nomen Business Enterprises (DBE/NBE) Policy and Program. Section 3: This resolution modifies the City of Rancho Cucamonga Disa dvantage~8u si-ness Program to comply with the 1987 Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act which presumes that women are socially and economically disadvantaged individuals whose participation may be counted in attaining DB goals. As such separate MBE goals wilt no longer be used and the terms "DB and 11BE" in the current adopted program shall be understood to mean DB. Section 4: The City Clerk is hereby directed to mail a copy hereof and a copy of-exhibit "1" to the State of California, Department of ?ran spor±a tl en, District 08 for approval. OQ ---- CITY OF RANCHO C'l'CANONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 7, 1987 r` `~ - I T0: City Council and City Manager i FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer • ~' BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician ~I SUBJECT: Approval and execution of Amendment to Map and Plan Checking Agreements for Engineering Services with C G Engineering, Derbish, Guerra and Associates, and L. A. '~ Wai ns cott and Associates for FY 1987-88 ~ RECONENp1TI0N: It is recommended that the City Council approve the subject Anrendnent to the Plan Checking Agreements with C G Engineering, Derbish, Guerra and Associates, and L. A. Wai ns cott and Associates and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign sane. BACKGROLH D/ANALYSIS Agreements for Engineering Services for Map and Plan Checking with C G Engineering, Derbish, Guerra and Associates, and L. A. Wainscott and H lSU~iai ea welt ayy~uvc~ Jig uyJ 5 ::37 $Ub^•^:^°_:h infA) of ~hn agreement has been amended to reduce the bodily iRiury and property damage insurance requirement from one million dollars (51,000,000) to five hundred thousand dollars (5500,000). The mal or responsibility and liability for the maps and plans lies with the engineer of record who prepares the maps and plans for the developer. The plan check engineers exposure and liability is minimal. Therefore it is our opinion that five hundred thousand dollars (5500,000) is adequate to cover any unforeseen liability. Respect submitted, ~~~HM.t6:dlw IO~ I i DA Te: - - -- -- l'[T}' IrF' P..A X('Hn l iY'.A 11U\l;.A STAFF REPORT October 7, 1987 i0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, Gity Engineer BY: Duane Baker, Administrative Assistant -rr'=.n~'~-c ~~~ j. 4~Y'_:,r l i( ~~ SUBJECT: Approval to initiate acqui sti on procedures for purchase of house and land at 5702 Amethyst Street for future right-of-way for Wilson gven ue. RECO!lENRATION City Council authorize staff to initiate acquisition procedures for the house and land located at 5702 Amethyst Street. Staff will reporr, hack to Council October 21 to seek approval of specific negotiations. Background/Analysis Tne property in question nos been identified as future right-of-way for Wilson Avenue. The owners of the property have approached the City with a willingness to sell the house and property. A rr an Sing the acquisition of the property in cooperation xi th the owner is advantageous to both [he City and the property owner. The City benefits because an important piece of right-of-way is acquired without the additional expense of court and eminent domain proceedings. The property owner benefits in this case because he is selling his property for fair market value at a time when he is prepared to move, If authorized to proceed, staff will initiate procedures and oe gin negotiations. 4t the conclusion of these negotiations, staff will report back to Council xi th specific recoum en dation for approval, Res pe ct`~U y submitted, R'1 M: OB: dlw it t-..- (p~ J .' ----- CiTS OF RANCHO Cl'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT ,~-~C~~ ~-~Yn} - t`„ lJ .l DATE: T0: FROM: 8Y: SUBJECT October 7, 1987 City Council and City Manager Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector ~..~ Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 11193, located on the southeast corner of Lemon Avenue and Amethyst Street, submitted by Pennf field Hanes RECOMIENGNTIOI It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the sub,lect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and Lity Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKfAOUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements for Tract 11793 were approved by the City Council on March 6, 1986, in the following amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: $248,000 Labor and Material Bond: $124,000 The developer, Pen of field Hanes, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City C1 erx's Office. Respect ly submitted, ~ ~ ~ ~ < LR gttachm en is RESOLUTION N0. 8 / -~ ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 11193 WHEREAS, the City Council of the Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on September 23, 198?, by Pennfieid Names as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the southeast corner of Lemon Avenue and Ameih ust Street; and WHEREAS, the installation of such inryrovements, described Sn said [mpro venent Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 11193; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Extension Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. II rD ?~ ',. ~~°~ 1" !, l _ '. -.. _~~1 _-. _... -_. ,r..... :. C..: __ __ Y~-Vq ~'~ ia: ~' ia~ E'er \ !h ~ t ® ~ _ _ _ _ _~ , , , ~ 1 v l ~ ~ ~ . _ _.. o._ I '. ~-l _~____ ~ I ~ ~ ,- .... _i. ~ __ I i i i ~_~ , --. . . ~, _ ~ .. -~ ~, ~. ,F.. .. .. _- ~, - ---- _ °' ~~ -~- ~' ~ ;~ ~ 1 ~ " - ---- -- _ _ g ~- I _.. ~' a ~_....~._I ~ .Ei 1. ' ARpY~51pN MAP o ~~, ~ TENT TRACT NO iC9J ~o crrY of ~ ~~--_ - ~:~~ ~ i~9 N RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE; 1 t ----- CIT`,' OF RANCHO C['CAil7ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 7, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer 8Y: Cathy Becker, Public Norks Inspector °'~ _~ SUBJECT: gpproval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Map 8680, located on the east side of Ramona gvenue south of Base Line Road, submitted by M & 5 Residential Development, Inc. REC01lENQATION It is recaianended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the sub,Iect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROLND Improvement agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements for Parcel Map 8680 were approved by the City Council on April 16, 1986, in the following amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: E31,000 Labor and Material 8o nd: E 1,350 The developer, M & S Residential Development, Inc., is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Res pe c' su itt ed, ~~_ RHM:CBad orra~~.mo~r. 6G RESOLUTION N0. ~Z ~-SaS A RESOLUi1CM OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ff RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, RPPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 8680 NIiEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Eztension executed on September 15, 1987, by M 6 S Residential Development, Inc. as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way ad,)acent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the east side of Ramona Avenue south of Base Line Road; and NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and sub,Ject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction wi*.h the development of said Parcel Map 8680; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by goad and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Extension Agreement. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. I L~'~ 6~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROJECT:~L/1 &68~ TITLE: ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: LcGA`iGN Vlar~ - ----- CITY OF RAwCHU C'CCA~tONGA STAFF REPORT r ,-~ GATE: October 7, 1981 '~'T~ „-~ i T0: City Council and City Manager i FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician ~, SUBJECT: Approval of Amending Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 13057 located in the Victoria i Planned Community between Milliken Avenue and The Oeer Creek i Channel, northerly of the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks, ~ submitted by The Fieldstone Company, and the release of the i Improvement Agreement and the Improvement Security previously submitted by William Lyon Company for said Tract. RECOMEIIOATI011 It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Amending Map 13057, accepting the agreement and security submitted by The Fieldstone Company, releasing the Agreement and Security previously submitted by The William Lyon Company, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement, release the agreement previously submitted and to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Tract 13051 located between Milliken Avenue and the Deer Creek Channel, northerly of the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks, in the Victoria Planned Community, was recorded on September 15, 1986. During the Design Review for Tract 13057, the Planning Commission also reviewed and approved the adjusbnent of a number of lot lines to accomodate certain required building setbacks. The Amending Map complies with the conditions approved by the Planning Commission on February 1, 1981, for said Design Review. The new Developer, The Fieldstone Company, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site imvrovements in the fuii uwiny amounts; Faithful Performance Bond: E460,000 Labor and Material Bond: 8230,000 69 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT OCTOBER 7, 1987 PAGE 2 The agreement and security submitted by The fieldstone Canpany replaces the agreement and security submitted by the original developer, The William Lyon Company, and accepted by the City Council on August 7, 1986. Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Off 1 ce. Respect submitted, .~ RH :LB:sd qt s / t7 RESOLUTION N0. 0 7 - ~~" A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEfENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT N0. 13057 AND RELEASING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED BY THE NILLIAM LYp1 COMPANY WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 13057, consisting of 149 lots, submitted by The Nil Liam Lyon Canpany, Subdivider, located between Milliken Avenue and The Deer Creek Channel, northerly of the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks approved by City Council on August 6, 1986, and an Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security were accepted. The Fieldstone Canpany, the new developer of Tract 13057, has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvenent Security to replace the Improvement Agreement and Security accepted by the City on August 6, 1986, submitted by The William Lyon Canpany. NON, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That said Improvement agreement submitted by The Fieldstone C ampany is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and The City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, sub3ect to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security submitted by The Willaim Lyon Canpany be released. ~, 7/ RESOLUTION N0. 8 2 - S 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ff RANCHO CUfAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDING M.AP ff TRACT N0. 13057 WHEREAS, an Amending Map for Tract No. 13057, consisting of 149 lots, submitted by The Fieldstone Company, Subdivider, located northerly of the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks between Deer Creek Channel and Milliken Avenue in the Victoria Planned Community has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in canpliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, said Subdivider submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE [T RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said Lity. \_ i L 7~ ~~Gw„ANJ I nVENdE . i ~ - _ ~ .. u ~ - a ~ a _ .. I f i ~\ ' M • \ /i/I 1 p f !1 a fa fa // of a> W ~ s i =2 A.drvE \ of ~~ .~ ~! .. V iQ '" i ~ ~ 1 ,ti !~ •. s !. a. ae n an rOCw 5~ i3' ¢' b` i ;e --- - ---'~~ a'~ e _ as > 4 a f a _~ ___ it 'S~ / ~ a !\;. :f .~ :5 .• C ~ \1 ~ ~~ a .--~~'~ ..: ~ n ~ ~ JJNrvE -~~ ~~ NVA~_~ l [~~` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DM3ION rrl~: 'pjggl,~ rn ts~s7 ~A• EXF~IT: -- - ----- CITS' OF R.ISCHU l'CCAMGNG:~ ~ STAFF REPORT ,_~ DATE: October 7, 1987 t?~ J T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 8Y: Linda Seek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 13353 located at the northwest corner of i Archibald Avenue and Nineteenth Street submitted by ALH ', Limited Partners, A California Limited Partnership j RECOMEMDATipI It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract 13353 accepting the subject agreenent and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City C1erM. to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Tract 13353 located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Nineteenth Street in the Medium Residential Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on August 13, 1986, for the division of o.a.f acres into a lots. The Developer, ALH Limited Partners, A California Limited Partnership, is submitting an agreement and security Lo guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $296,000 Labor and Material Bond: E148,000 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have keen received from the high school and elementary s chnnl districts and Cuc moon as County Water Oist rict. C.C.&R .'s have also oeen approvea oy the City Attorney. R esp ~ bmi tted, RHM. Attachments 9s~ RESOLUTION N0. p ~J ~~ p A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT N0. 13353 NHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 13353 consisting of 3 lots, submitted by ALH Limited Partners, A California Limited Partnership, Subdivider, located on the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Nineteenth Street has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and fn compliance with the requirenents of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and NHEREAS, to meet the requirenents established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by sold City, together wSth good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOw, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the Gity of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That said improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute sane on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is uu Liim iceu Lu aiLesL liiereW; an6 2, That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, sub,lect to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedicatf on and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. 7~ ~. ' F_ •;, :. fEfERKCifR~ IV T6iWI~ ; __,_ -~-T'~__ v~ 1 ~ B - 1 T, ,._ -~__~fI „ - _ ~ I i titr ~EO /i Lo- ~ V t ~ T: « ~ ry ~ '~ W r ,e ' $ r --a`-'•-~' ~ _ ' .OTL 'm oTC Ef D 1 r ry aE ~ , o/ as r r • . RM ~[E~f ' ~ ~ f •w'v i wn _ D i~ .~ 1 E~ E . ~~ {t {i V N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERIIIG DIVL9ION rr~: ~~9: rn 13351 err: - CITY OF RANCHO CI;CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DOTE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT October 7, 1987 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Linda Beek, Engineering Technician -~ ~~ , Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 13475 located at the northeast corner of Ramona Avenue and Church Street submitted 6y W.D.S. Development RECOMENDAiiON It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract 13475, accepting the subdect agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. RNALYSIS/BACKGROIND Tract 13475 located at the northeast corner of Ramona gvenue and Church Street, in the Low Density Residential Development District, was approved by the planninn rrmmiccinn n Gchaiia. ~. 9S toot/ c,... •~... •:..: ,. acres into 29 lot s. ~ - ~ ~~~ --~' - ' ~-- ' . ~, ~~~~ u„ „~~a V' ~ ~" The Developer, W.D.S. Development, is submitting an agr eemer,t and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvanents in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: 5470,000 labor and Material Bond: 5235,000 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary ~chocl districts and Cur amonga County Water nistr:ct. Respec y su mitted, i t /`~ HRH •L3:sd Rttachments ~7 RESOLUTION N0. 0 ~ Sad A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ff RANCHO CUCAMONf~1, CALIFORNIA, RPPROV ING IM?ROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TFACT N0. 13475 MHE REAS, the Tentatf ve Map of Tract No. 13475 consisting of 29 lots, submitted by M.D.S. Development, Subdivider, located at the northeast corner of Ranona gvenue and Church Street has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirenents of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and NHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits far approval said Final Map offering far dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That said improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said Cfty and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subJect to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. V II ~~ W •• cnuecn CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DM3ION ~ ~. ••.. ~ •• •, etee[i ~i ! <' TITLE: -~ EXHIBIT: N -- ---- CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA ~ ~ti C_a ~V,t ;' STAFF REPORT ; . , ,;; z~A _ DATE: October 7, 1937 ~ ~~~, 6. i T0: City Council and City Manager ~ i~`- FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer ~, BY: Steven Allen, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Award the contract for Phase II, of the Area Ylt Storm Drain Improvement Project to Drainage Construction to be funded from Drainage Fund for the amount of 5835,632.00. RECOMENDATION: IL is recommended that the City Council accept all bids as submitted and award the contract for Phase 2, Area YII Storm Drain Improvement Project to the lowest responsible bidder, Drainage Construction, Inc, for the amount of 5835,632.00. Background/Analysis Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on September 11, 1987 for the subject project. Drainage Construction, Inc. ~i.~ en •_ ln~.n er rncnnnei hln 6iddar with a bid amount Of 5835,632.U~~(see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was S1,3D6,626.D0. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to Se complete and in accordance with the Sid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds alt bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Respectfully submitted, ` IRHM-'I Jr cc: 7urc`~a;i ng .. .. ~ o ~ 8 w a W ~ f ~ CO Q 6 ~ = M N O O W y~ yC J K 8 Nb 10 rl M f W i d a 8 N ~ I - Oi W W ~ _ y L Z R O E f H 4 w c C ~ H G '~ ~ e W H ~~~ JJJ f O ~ ~ ap O LLm O ~I r ~/ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 7, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steven Allen, Jr. Civil Engineer ~~ct:,io~ ~'~~,_ >I'' _ Z a I9'~ ~ SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Ramona Avenue Reconstruction Improvement Project, between 19th and Victoria Streets RECi31/ENDATIdI: It is recommended that Cfty Council approve plans and specifications for the "Rangna Avenue Reconstruction Improvement project and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." Background/Analysts The subject project plans and specifications have been completed by Hackett d Kramer Surveying E Engineering, tnc., reviewed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction . e,m nnn nn ie""t ., nucrri <inn is scheduled for October 13, 1987, and Oc tober~2O, 1987, with the bid opening at 2:00 p.m., Friday, October 26, 1987. Respectfully submitted, ~' , ~~ /~ j r ' ~Y ~~ RHM: SA:jh cc: Purchasing g~ g ~ - sae RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FDR THE "RAMONA AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION", IN SAID CITY ANO AUTHORIZING ANO DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS, WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. NHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and ~neci~+{±r?.c.^.c f_, Gha ~Jrolru«ion of certain improvements. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEU that the plans and spcif icati ons presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the Dlans and 5pa{ifi{4tt^^.R ~9" "n9~:B5 AVeirU2 KN.GifS CrUC LiUn~~. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" 7ursuani Lu a ne auiu Liun of Liie Cuuncii ui Lia vi Ly ui na n~iw Cu~annmya, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE 1S HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 23rd day of October 1981, sealed bids or proposals for the "Ramona Avenue Reconstruction" in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read imrediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91130, Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of Ramona Avenue Reconstructon". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice 1s he re6y gt ven that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Cude, Division 2, Part 7, Chap¢er i, Articles i and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California 83 is requireC to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such Geterminations to be posted at the job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as pensalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five doilare (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated fer any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in vlol,~,ttnn _,. ..... provisions of said Labor Code. . a~cvrdance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1177.6 of the Labor Code concerning Lhe employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1177.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenttceabie occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and niii~ii awui uie Lma Lice appren Lire aitiy pruyr•mn in Li~ai Trade Ter a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that wilt be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, er C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewidz or locally, or 0. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered appentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. g 1/ The Contractor is required to m'~.. ..~~ributions to funds established for the administration of apo'e~~•~-'.~np programs if he employs registered apprentices or ,iourne~-~. ~~ ,riy apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors ~~ .ire public works site are making such contributions. ..ontrattor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the r~yui rements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the A6ninistrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed 1n the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in DtvTSion 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said labor Code. Cun Lra~tu r• ay reee iu yay Lr•avei and eubaielence yay iu ea~ii wurkuan needed to execute the work required by th 15 contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8, The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied Dy the City of Rancho Cucamonga W the dSfference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. $S The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contrctor will also be required to furnisA a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may 6e entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been issued by the CTty of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Ctass "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the tulle time this contract is awarded. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of (35.00, said f35.00 is nanrefundabie. Upon written request Dy the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of 515.00 to cover the cast of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satfsfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Pions and Specifications regarding the work contracted to he done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). $lo The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to re,iect any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this day of _ 1987. PASSED ARD ADDPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this day of 19_ or ATTEST: ty er ~7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 7, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve Allen, Jr. Civil Engineer t~%`~`~9 ~', , ~',. ~, ¢!~_~\'r >. ~ F z _ _> 19- ~ SUBJECT: Award the Haven Avenue Medians Beautification, Phase II Improvement Project from 4th Street to Arrow Route to Hacienda Landscape, Inc., for the amount of 5719,661.84. It is reconnrended that the City Council accept all bids as submitted and award the contract for Naven Avenue Medians Beautification Phase II Improvement Project to' the lowest responsible bidder, Hacienda Landscape, Inc., for the amount of 5719,661.84. Background/Analysis Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on September 28, 1987, for the subject project. Hacienda Landscape, Inc. is the apparent lowest responsible bidder with a bid amount of 5719,661.84 ICPP attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was 51,100,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete ana in accordance with the bid requirements except for minor arithmetic discrepancies in some of the bids which does not change the order of the bids. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all STdders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Respeetfv submitted, r ~F«.. <.---j" cc: Purchasing a .. o .. 2 N O U ~ W O CO C 1~ W ~ 6 ID 6 p 2 J Y~ W r c w ~ D U ° o O ~ rl o m p W o ~ ~ W 2 p O O O O N H V p p ii ~ ~ 6 = ~ N _ ~+ u W Y Y C. N W > F- aC ~ N (..f = T N W 6' W W ~ J O Z s z O M Y ~ N y ' W ~ 6 µ ~ O J Y 1- 3 { y m W N OC H S Y a W ~ ~ lei 2 U Y! T 6 O~ < .. p g C z w w ~ 4 a _ -' R M x 0 m i- o W H ~ 0 s ~'9 Y ~b T t3~ T ~; Wp2 O y4 yI_ O N a~ F u N W r ~_ W d 4 Y E O V i G w ~ ~ ~ yy rc ° ~7{ ~- ~ °~ S ~ ~ o ~ ~ N 3 S '~ 3 ~ _ ., ~ _ F M S 6 ~ M O O b o a `` ~ ~ 9 6 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~IONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 7, 1987 TD: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Nalt Stickney, Associate Civil Engineer ~' >~9, ti~ \ Y ti ~ L. j SUBJECT: To establish an amount required of a development as a contribution in lieu of the construction of median islands on Haven Avenue from Arrow Route to 19th Street REC01lENDATIBN: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution establishing a linear foot rate fora contribution by private development on Haven Avenue from 'Arrow Route to 19th Street, toward the cost of a landscaped median on Haven Avenue. Background With the City's desire to construct a uniform landsca Ded median in Haven Avenue extending from 4th Street to north of Wilson Avenue, the City has designed a three phased median improvement plan for the above specified llmt rt rtie rnnrrart fnr the H rst ohase of this Dlan, extending north from Arrow Route to 19th Street, has been awarded with construction soon to commence. Phase II, from 4th Street to Arrow Route, will follow soon after Phase I. Analysis Due to the City's desire to have a uniform median design throughout the limits of the median and in order to install medians in locales where development is not expected in the near future, the City has designed and will construct a landscaped median on Haven Rvenue. To offset the cost of Lhe median incurred by the City, a cost which private development would have been required to Sear, City Council approved Sy resolution No. 87-49i the 2stahlishment of fees in Lieu of construction to be applied to the cast of constructing the Haven Avenue Medians Phase I. Tne attached resolution establishes a unit amount of SS1 per linear foot of property fronting on Haven Avenue from Arrow Route to 19th Street. Tnis unit cost was established by prorating the total costs associated with Phase t of the Haven Avenue Median Beautification Project to the total property frontages applicable to Phase I of the prc'ec t. Due to tha physical nature of the project, GI Flaven Avenue Median Islands Staff Report Paqe 2 this method was determined to be the most equitable means of distributing the contribution required of development. In order to best adiust the unit cost to a current year value, the unit cost for contribution will be increased on a fiscal year basis by the Prime Interest Rate as determined at the beginning of each fiscal year. Respectfully submitted, RIB N Q~ RESOLUTION N0. S 7 ~~~/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTADLlSHING ANO ADOPTING A FEE SCHEDULE PERTAINING TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE HAVEN AVENUE MEDIAN FROM ARROW ROUTE TO 19TH STREET WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is constructing a landscaped median within Haven Avenue from Arrow Route to 19th Street; and WHEREAS, the City Councii has determined by Resolution No. &7-491 that future development shall contribute toward the cost of said median; and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that it is necessary to establish methods to equitably share said cost among those benifited by said improvements. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IS RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California that staff, Committees and Commissions require, as a condition of approval of any development, a contribution in lieu of the construction for said landscaped median and such contribution shall be an amount equal to 557.00 per linear foot of property fronting on Haven Avenue. Corner property frontages shall be measured to the prolongation of the ultimate right-of-way of the side street. Payment of said contribution shall be made prior to building permit issuance or recordation of the Tract or Parcel Map, whichever occurs first. The unit contribution amount shall automatically be increased on a fiscal year basis by the Prime Interest Rate as determined at the beginning of each fiscal year. Q3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: October 7, 1987 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer l?'G'~iiyC ~ , i ~= i ~;r ^ iA E. ~` Z ~~-- Subiect: Approval of Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication between August H. Reiter, III and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements at 9744 Arrow Route It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication between August H. Reiter, III and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. sACIISRau{o~Aiiil~rs I s- The attached subl ect Agreement between the City and August H. Reiter, t[I provides for street improvements which Include curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights and street pavements along Mr. Reiter's Arrow Route frontage. Mr. Reiter has agreed to grant to the City a Roadway Eastvoent to allow for the widening and improvement of Arrow Route in return iu~ tiic wi~Sti uL t. Jii of aa~a inyi v. n«c i~~>. Said street improvements will be constructed in con,iurtction with the City's Rrrow Route Phase I Street Improvement Proiect from Archibald Avenue to Turner Avenue. Resp submitted, r ~'--~ RHM: :pam Attachments RESOLUTION N0. D ~' S3 a'" A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM 11UGUST H. REITER, III AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME MHEREAS, the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish requirements for construction of frontage Improvements in conjunction with the Arrow Route Phase I Street Improvement Project; and MHEREAS, installation of curb, gutter, drive approach, sidewalk, street lights and street pavements located at 9744 Arrow Route to be made part of the Arrow Route Phase I Street Improvement Project; and MHEREAS, August H. Reiter, III has agreed to dedicate Right-of- May as reimbursement to the City for said improvements. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamohga, California, does accept said Improvement Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the Ctty Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. ~_- ( ('~ 9s' CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: October 7, 1987 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russeil H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Henry MurakosM , Associate Civil Englneer ~ ~,rcl.+fa"~,c ~' -• `o z A fl Z -` > wc: -i Subject: Approval of Professional Services Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and L.D. King, Inc., to prepare Topographical Design Services for the Improvement of Via Carrillo Drive from Avenida Vejar to East of Sierra Madre Avenue (11500 ft). The maximum fee is f2600.00 and the project is under CDBG Funding it is recommended that the City Council approve the above Professional Services Agreement for the Improvement of Via Carrillo Drive BACK6ROUMD/AMIILYSIS• On July 29, 1987, City requested the puD115her of the San Bernardino "American" to advertise the Notice Inviting Bids for Topographic and Design Services. It was advertised twice, July 30th and August 6th, 1967. Three Engineering Consultants responded and submitted their bids; the lowest bidders were L.D. King, tnc., and Hackett and Kramer with the amount of 5960(1 00 a <umma rv of thn nrnnneal< to ae fnllnpre• L.D. King 52600.00 Hackett and Kramer 52600.00 Sanderson and Associates f2695.00 Resp f submitted, r R :HM: Attac ments 9~ L~C1~1G September 28, 1987 .E E E; 8 .Z ~ n E n 8 C O P B O P S E R V ICE E P 0 R Topographical Dasiga eurvaps for the isprovuaat of vis Carrillo Drive lros avaaida vaj ar to asst or eiarra Madre llvaava, appro=iaatalp 1,500= tact 1. Centerline control and stationing extending 100 feet maximum beyond project limits. 2. Topography from right-of-way to right-of-way. 3. Cross sections at 50 foot maximum, and as needed for driveway transitions. 4. Location of utility facilities (manholes/pole lines, etc.) F. Field nnf.P.R to br. dP.11VP.rP.d to tMP. (`.1rV fcr YP.nnrd. 6. Attend coordination meetings as required. 97 L~C1~1G September 28, 1987 aaaiaix .,$~, p R O J E C T 8 C 8 6 D D L E Z O R Topographical Design eurveya for the i~provuant of via Carrillo Drive from 7lvaaida veju to oast of Sierra Nedra 7lveaua, approxiutalp i,SOOt feat We are prepared to start work within 48 hours of notice to proceed. We also anticipate completion of our services within two (2) working days. /~ ~~~ September 28, 1987 ~ I~ I H I T " 4 A E I M B D A B E M E E T 1 O A Topograpaioal Daaiga Burvapa for tAa iaprovmeat of via Carrillo Drive frog Avaaida vajar to aaat of Eiarra Madre Avanua, appzoEi~ataip 1,5001 !aa! 2-Man Survey Party $118.00 / Hr. 3-Man Survey Party 145.00 / Hr. Project Manager 80.00 / Hr. Survey Coordinator 69.00 / Hr. Designer/Calculator 57.00 / Hr. Drafter 43.00 / Hr. Engineering Aide 24.00 / Hr. Production Typist 20.00 / Hr. 99 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: October 7, 1987 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Richard L. Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor,~L SUBJECT: RELEASE OF CASH DEPOSIT RECOMMENDATION: Mork for the following tract has been completed ana the cas epos in the total amount of 22,500.00 is hereby recomce~ed by the Planning Division to be released to Pulte flame Corporation, 270 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, California 92660. AMOUNT OF TRACT N0. LOT N0. DEPOSIT 13022 -- 52,500.00 RECEIPT ND. PURPOSE 37857 Model Home Sales Trailer Resp ully su fitted, i r Br 1 r City P1 nner BB:RA:ns /00 nrmv nc~ n ~ wrnvn nr rn ~ wrnun w STAFF REPORT ~~~__.~ ~ r. ;~' ' z'- ~ F a~ ~_ '. FI ~ ~~ GATE: October 7, 1987 1977 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Braa Buller, City Planner BY: Richard L. Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor/~(,t. SUBJECT: RELEASE OF CASH DEPOSIT RECOMMENDATION: Nork for the following tract has been completed and the cas epos n the total amount of 5500.00 is hereby recommended by the Planning Division to be released to Rancho Yerde Village, Inc., 22632 East Golden Springs, Suite 280, Diamond Bar, California 91765. TRACT N0. LOT N0. 12091 -- Res full bmitted, 8 1 r Cit Planner Btl:RA:ns AMOUNT OF DEPOSIT RECEIPT N0. PURPOSE f500.00 31270 Subdivision Sign (On-Site) ~~ STAFF REPORT $~`W+~~'.r ~~~~ f'i $ DATE: October 7, 1987 _ 1977 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Richard Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor I~tG SUBJECT: RELEASE OF CASH DEPOSIT RECOMMENDATION: Nork for the following tract has been completed and the cas epos in the total amount of f2,500.00 is hereby recommenced by the Planning Division to be released to Crismar Development Corporation, P. 0. Box 2131, Santa Monica, California 90406. AMOUNT OF TRACT N0. LOT N0. OEPOSIT RECEIPT N0. PURPOSE 9440 36 f2,500.00 21190 Model Nomes Sales Office (Temporary) Respe idly sub 'tied, ~~~ ra r City P1 nner BB:RA:ns /l7..2,~ nrmv na n n urvn rrrr n urnwTr_n STAFF REPORT ~~ ~'. ' ~ ,; Y ~ 0 f.n ~2 DATE: October 7, 1981 ''' I9~~ T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Richard L. Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor ~(, SUBJECT: RELEASE OF CASH UEPOSIT RECOMMENDATION: Work for the following tract has Deen conryleted and the case-l~eposi£s~n the total amount of f4,000.00 is hereby recoaaended by the Planning Division to oe released to the Deer Creek Company, 8480 Utica Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. AMOUNT OF TRACT N0. LOT N0. DEPOSIT RECEIPT N0. PURPOSE 12801-1 6 52,500.00 30475 Model Nome Sales Office (Temporary) 12801-1 -- 51,000.00 28969 Two On-Site Subdivision Signs 12801-1 -- S 500.00 30119 Trap Fencing Surrounding Model Complex Res fully submitted, Bra a er Ci tj Planner BB:RA:ns 7G ,~ nrmv nn onwirun rrrrn~un~rn ._ STAFF REPORT GATE: October 7, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector S..tU SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Motice of Completion RECD1lE11011TI011: `s The required street improvements for Tract 12726 have Deen canpleted in an acceptable manner and it fs recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of 56.825.50 authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize tbe City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of (68,255.00. Background/gnalysis Tract 12726 - located between Bear Creek and Saddleback Place 4100~Canpus Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 56,825.50 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 568.255.00 Resp submftted, ,~ c..- RHM:SG:sd /Dy RESOLUTION N0. ~ ~ ' ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRgCT 12726 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK NHEREAS, the Wnitruttion of public improvements for Tract 12726 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NNEREAS, a Notice of Canpletfon 1s required to be filed, certifying the work canplete. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer Ts authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Rewr~r of San Bernardino County. ~l7~ - CITT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: October 7, i987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector ~,MC SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion REttNlENOATIdi: The required street improvements for Tract 12127 have been completed 1n an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the aaount of 13,969.60 authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 539,696.00. Background/Analysfs Tract 12721 - located between Bear Creek and Saddleback Place u~ ~~V ~ 4100~Campus Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 53,969.60 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 539,696.00 Res pe y Jjmi tted, t! ~ RHMi G: sd ~ ~a6 RESOLUTION N0. ~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUiCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM0NC,4, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12121 AND gUTHORI2ING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE IN)RK NHEREAS, the wnstruction of public improvements For Tract 12727 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work canpl ete. NON, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and fife a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. /6 ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: October 7, 1981 T0; City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Cathy Becker, Public Norks Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECON£NQIITION: ~,~MO,~ 7 ~~ ,,.. ~I I~~ F ~~ > 19"' The required street improvements for Tract 12040 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said Improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of f21,250, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of (212,500. Background/Analysis Tract 12040 - located on the northeast corner of Turner Avenue and Arrow Route DEVELOPER: The Anden Group 1074 Park View Drive Covina, CA 91722 Accept; Maintenance Guarantee Band (Street) 521,250 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) (212,500 Re spec tfv .~ submitted, /~ ' ~ ~,~ r ~ ~~~~~ RMM. ~~ RESOLUTION N0. 87- 53S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12040 ANO AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 12040 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, be 1t resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. /09 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~ ~icnuo,~c ~, o 'I i p A F" U ~Z j:. !> DATE: October 7, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FRCM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director BY: Elizabeth Stoddard, Assistant Finance Director SIIBJEC2: ARTICLE 8 CLAIM ~: RANSPORTATION FUNDS FOR L 1 19'7 RHCOHHHHDATIOH: 1. The City Council authorize the City Manager to sign the attached Article 8 Claim. 2. The City Council authorize by minute action the distribution o£ Transportation Development Act Funds (TDS) £or Fiscal Year 1986-87 £or S80',„638. nn nv r_o nr rtm. Each year it is necessary that the City Cou r.cil authorize the City Manager to sign the attached Article 8 claim form to authorize receipt of the City's Transportation Development Act Funds for street and road purposes. For F~i seal Year 1986-87, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive a total of ~885,159•CC, in Transportation De velopaent Act Funds. Rescectr'~.111y submihted, .~ •11111 Rio l'~ Administrative Services Dire otor .: RS:cv ~~Q SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TDA NONTRANSIT CLAIM FORM STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUND FISCAL YEAR: DATE: 1987-1988 August 13, 1987 City of Rancho Cucamonga San Hernardino P.O. Box 807 U tats rans t ss stance and Mai ng Address pUC Secttan 99313.3 LOCaI Str!!t5 end Roads Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91770 ty and p ode Elizabeth Stoddard, Asa[. Pin. Dir. ttent on: name and t e Russell Maguire (714) 989-1851 contact erson- hone Number TOTAL ALLOCATION REQUESTED: S 807,638 lUNU111UN Ur RYYNUYpL: gpprOVal OT this payment by the County Auditor to this claimant are subject to monies being available, and to the Drovision that such monies will be used Doty in, accordance accordance with the allocation instruct tons. gU1NUN1LtU ~1~11RIUNE (CLAIMANT'S CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OR FINANCIAL ORRICER) ignature Lauren Wasserman, Cicy Manager ayment c u e eQueste ne ayment _ Mont y tr y _ Other -- Indicate monthly payments on the following schedule: 7 10 1 4 8 II 2 5 9 12 3 6 35 '1-5 ~~~ Project Boundaries (Street Specific) 1. Foothill 6 Rochester (;I50,000) 2. Carnelian d Vineyard and Red Hill C.C. Dr. (5140,000) 3. Highland b Milliken (5110,000) 4. Highland S Milliken (590,000) 5. ease line b Spruce (590,000) 6. Baven b Fourth (590,000) 7. Baseline Road from Alta Cuea[a to Nermosa (51,000) 8. Neu Signals: Baseline b A1[a Cuesta Baseline b Amethyst Archibald S 9th Upgrade Constrollers: Baseline E Carnelian Baseline d Archibald (52,000) 9. Haven S Civic Center (580,000) I0. Baseline S Victor is Park Lane (527,500) ll. Archibald from Fourth to Baseline (516,000) i2. Haven a 6th (590.000) 13. Haven S Jersey (590,000) Street and Road Pzofec is (Article 8) 4l Attachment Type of Work (Construction, Maintenance, Antic lpated Anticipated Paving, etc.) Starting Date Completion Date Traffic Signal 8/87 LO/88 Traffic Signal 7/87 4/88 Traffic Signal 7/87 5/88 Traffic Signal 7/87 5/88 Traffic Signal 7/87 4/88 Traffic Signal 7/87 1/88 Signal Coordina[1on 8/87 9/87 Traffic Signal (new 6 upgrade) 7/87 8/87 Traffic Signal 7/87 4/88 Traffic Signal 9/87 3/88 Signal Cocrd lnation 12/87 6/88 'L'ratt is Signal 7/87 4/88 Traffic Signal 7/87 4/88 ~~°L FY 87-88 PROJECT DESCRIPTION (STAF ONLY] - Local Streets and Road Purposes Type of Nork Anticipated Anticipated Project Bouiularf es (Construction, Neintenance, Starting Starting (Street soeciftc) paving, etc.) Date Date see attached u"i FY 97-88 PROJECT INFORMATION (for bicycle and pedestrian protects only) 1.) PrO~eCt Nape: (1.) Tryon Sidewalks (2.) Archibald Sidewalks 2.) Project Budget: Revenue 70,000 TDA Art tcle 3 (SB 821) S TDA Article 8 Other f Total Pro,)ect Revenues f 70,000 3.) Estimated Starting Date (Month/Year) (IJ z/aa (2.) 7/87 Estimated Completion Date (Month/Year)(I•) '%°' (z•) IlSS 35- 1-5 // III ti Nm 6 y 2 y~ v 6 W O f N4L Ny N {J mCS~ O 9 ti v o: Y ~ C O ~ 9 A d OS N¢ LOS 41J ua a¢ N L~ 6.1 •+ V a- V N .=n a! U LL CD O J y V V L Q O H U N Y 0 ro U v W N a O r 6 O T L v_ 1 m LL ~ 6 M ~ a+ N O~ U a ~ a `!~ e1 m A ~ r •+ Y N W W N ~ n Y OL W 1 m m m O dQ O\ ua u u Lo v ¢.°_. y ~ A O~ E ..M Y H ~ ; I i f Y • f '/1 W O _ I~ .+ b O T vl T .D m a _ m n o ~n v ~ m ti v n O. n p • a f • w • f 0 0 ~n ~n in m ~O ~O O O • m - m ~D n ~p .v ~O r ~1 t'1 y nl ti H N I.1 V U1 ~O 1~ D) 01 ~ M ~ C ~ C O ~ y u > .+ m y N W G U in b q O ° a z ~n ' ' .. U N i0 N C VI y A r y Y C d j N O. ~+ { LL ~ o a va ~LV L L y c y c A « 'C w~ O 01 i y u C O O. Y O N N r/~ y v ~( L L C y V C N ~ V N U O C .~ N y p N L N J~ N y L ~ C OI wJ 4J LL L ~ V U^ U y N Q C O Y J C E m y -. ~- i Ql / y W O 1- N W ~+ i N M O 4(f Gb 1~ A Q) ~ O~ tr S W m W a L y o a n~ N L I C - -~ O A C I U y b E r W O r V N t y YJ C y O L L C + J 6 m O L V- ~ r u y C TJ Y C V A ro y L 7 .+ .L+ a LL T ~ a y E C 7 L 01 O ~LL h N V ~ .r'.~ v v v .. ... 8 .' 7 y ... 41 • l(1 o O ~' •'~ N F N • M icy l.iTV n~ D A t.T/.LiA l.i i!. A ll/1\i/~ A STAFF REPORT ~~~w ~~'c - o ~I 6 yen I DATE: October 7, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROid: Jim 3art, Administrative Services Director BY: Elizsbeth Stoddard, Assistant Finance Director SUBJECT: APPROPRIATION TRANSFER RBCOlQ4BHDARIOH: Authorize the transfer of funds from Fund 09 (Gas Tax 2107) to Fund II (vas Tax 2106). BACKGROUND: On May 7, 1987, contract number 87-045 for various street rehabi litstion projec±s was approved from the Gas Tax funding source (2'06, 2107, 2107.5)• Prior to the end oP the 1986-87 Fiscal year, sufficient funds were nct encumbered by way of purchase order to allow for continued payment of the contractor. She purchase order would have been carried forward to the 1987-88 fiscal year had the funds been encumbered. An appropria*. ion transfer of $2?,000 is being requested to correct the oversight and allow for continued payment of the contractor. Respectfully submitted, _/Jytii ,~ R var*. A:?m?r_i •-!!, a. `.1 va fieryi^e? ~~i ro rtnr •?[I:Cv //J nrmv nn. n w wrnvn nrrn ~ •.rnun STAFF REPORT ~~~v , ,~ - of 8 ,~~ i DATE: October 7. 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROri: Jim Rart, Administrative Services Uirector BY: Elizabeth Stoddard, Assistant Finance Director SUBJEC2: 1986-87 ENCUMBRANCES RSCOl4BADATIOB: Council approve the encumbrances Prom FY 86-87 and appropriate the funds to the account ae outlined in the report. BACKGROUND• During Fiscal Year 1986-87 (FY 86-87), projects were started and funds encumbered tc pay for services. At the close oP FY 85-87. invoices and some services were still outstanding, therefore, the encumbered funds need to be carried forward and appropriated to the account as detailed on the attached Encumbrance Detail Report (6-3C-87 ). Respectful/ly^,y/ ~~ .Tim Bart Administrative Services Uirector E:ES:CY //~ l • • • ~ m a ar {I 7 P pP O O~ ^ r p m -• a .• m f 7 J J ~~ N i~ I OOrVOOn°OnVOinam+mmOOm^mrOnrOOJ000 OaOrrOmnm m OOr OrPaO^y000P0^mmPrrwrl..Nm+mrym000000P ONO•-m.JmaPO+OrSm -OPrPOm mPrvaaarPOmnOrOrOyn On npPa nmPOwm marv°aronammJ.°i.nmm$mrra ~- 'n vor.a .°v °o ~.r. °m ara nuP.rranm~~~vr n ^ n r.^ N:^ o P n n .. o. i~ o~ J~ a. m+r+ooooo000 pooopo ommr+rooooommmmmmmrooooo0000 p000000 1 OOJOPPPPPPPPP°PPPOp000PPPPPOJOOOJOCPPPPPPPptOTJpSPPP yrr maarr aaaaaa arm mmm mim nhn+i::<oiaa ainuioacooo~oooooo~oo~rm+. ~~n l~~n~l:.~.n u~~r NNVrvhrynNnnnammmwwmm r:r+r+r.rr++:rr rynryryhNnnh i +i++ii ii+i++ rir m 0 VI 21 .. .. n .. -.. n .. _~ .. ss s Wz i iz = x ° o ^°o J mo.m.. o W ~l ° W WV ti W SJ2 w U C fL ~Zn it _ mwm hJ2 N O O rV OJ. 2WOpYm wz `aurzw=z~~ ~o •x eom;~,`o~:s -a`:. ~~ Jx,., ..<^x~ aw ~rcs^ ,.uza 'm .J rzNZn mz~ z >` ~xJO=>iiw mcor^--°a oLUi wo .`-js ~.o~ooWi iwma^N os i4• -xoa~m oos= sxn cram iuuw°LL m•ru ~=~'.~~.~r~ Jo Ys. wuo s ..> JsH~ %oo° L so . ~=^ z° Mz oJ~i~aa. waasz^ wwro< o3'i Lsi iwzz rz .r.iu ~z~ww`s w°ii~ < -s> Hz=°^ ~O<r-m O^O vim w66a.R rVawOU6Jw^O~O V. _ ¢U%SNONUU.~^-YmrVZLw^ZwwNO_60w SJw 23 ~: ^O^ lmr wVpwZZJ ¢ Vu•n<`Y2NN uU ON =o~PSnNOSwu~ OVV=ywOYNOwr~O-wi O)w^mV~OLL OJnV1 )OOJPOVOr V2JV<L<N^O¢O`OL2RU U tiwr[~' Z -O ~•N i+WLOOhP O ~OhnmNmmOZ~OYIN>O maVN-O^ZaOmR °U NiVm~~O•ia0^ZSaimws~~i nymywPm VV rvG0^rnmmrvmmrN r mapr O~~Nrv~aPW ^m^Wm mmmD~ nVr^mVPPaNNn nOVPPm^wNP rPpJw^~- q mmPyVPV nU+r~O^prvPPmPm^arP +r rPa NJ~.OC~J+:O'OOJ000.pUmOPJOO~nmU^^1 rV i`IOJOOOVOOOJOG0004~ G O. O~~Jn.~~0000000 OOGJVOOOOUOUOmOODUJOOGO000V000000 // u i • mo • ~ . ... o moo Pm o~m < n ~ m a~rv uO J. n N ry m P J V U m S 0 p OI ry Q. i pDmpv poopooNOO r~-e~vo a~- aorm~.. noOONNN.moNo amoooooN~mm~oooooNOroO-.n..aomr aJm.. ,~ oapoom a.~.o P,.. DOOM U.a mO0a00.•rOOnP•'~OPrvNO rOmVm ryaaua•. rmNdav.m h00••ONVrnOPaaPlOlPr ONmPr NOntnNrryrNam ra V NpNrOrN OrmOhN rr.a •• PO n.• Nn .• nNmN•+ r VN n Pn m.Pp m O N rv ti O 1 w .r .• O OOOOOOOOOOmO@000@000000VVV1JlOOOrymfY0000001 p000p000 p0 PPPPPPPVpP00000GO0000000O00UOmlYp000PPPPPOOPpPPpPP aaaa.oam.Y aaaaarr~~rhrniaarrmmmmmahmmmmmmm '~N,nNN~n NLL. ,n ,nn mmnrl'1'1 ~.m mmmmm roaammm m .... ........ ..m h NN+mmm±mmmTmmmmmm 11MV11111VV IYtVIV 1VV1J11vfV L L L Hr = Q¢r+ SSY •, O o ]2 , J S 222 ~ V}w0 rOWO¢ OD ••O>OwwW NZ2D O a¢ <O~w,r~ rt V~ ' LO 6J¢LS•Z+ SPwuw ~i~6 vim 2 OJZ~y .+J , ..1 mtu VOr< 4 x< <OI O <VJ _ - m S G ~J G -' f2S6 ~ ~~.{~..~£SGw,n J32LJ ~O.+uw H¢S~NU LL%O^¢viY WOUZ Lw w3 - iymp¢ii° a u~~¢.,r wpa x~~ -p- s¢ iQ~ ~ ya-o~ ¢N ~¢io~LO< z~u.ia a wu ¢,nOOwY Ju. plra ww0 w Omo~O 2 Zu •a'. w,n p w a Urp.. .- Qw oiu r%..~_.x ..U=V,np 02¢~a rirVy s~ «ux~m~N :w rx •zo~o IL< sJ wswrw .YZ~o«m ,. <o¢iurw~iuzwr`-o..oo£nzi v .r.,i6 •zz< io~,owo<uz..oJm Y.<-I-}x1221 LLNrIC< u~U~VrQxYN< YJ{ rc~ niLaNZrzw .•LO< mo•a uoo°bmv~uoo w.^ii. n~ •wmoz o..w uii~umowihlo<zw»i~¢o~<NOOmo o..<za ¢ u ,., um~nn ~F.•UU>oLLN ~-. ~•+ N..d ••u rw£wYUOmi <n><v..pmri j oNNNPPmNnmPmPNryPnTWam O~+N N1"NPmm`r ~Nmaaar^a^P1m0PUNPmN Z~ YaOr VC ^.N OGmV1r1PVPm@mV1V VV aNVVm •^PPVv LODOU ~OVOVO.nGUp•-mm000000UJO0UJ0 JOVOOmpOJ0000 ~~, ~~ JCOVOCVUOOGOUOOUOOUV0GUU60UOOOJOVJOOCOUOGO./p000ODU //V o P O m a P O ~ ~ V w in N .o .. mOVPOrmONwOmNUmOOnf mlrnOPJOpa0000pJOOJO00f 000J.ONrP nOamOm mJfinFNmfYNmmOVNOO J•[•OmJOOpaONO Yy/J yu•u(n nm r~l py mJNm^rr/-f mrm.+O.pmrPrvOmPmOPpmmmNONOmrOPNmPOJ .'.aNLL(pOTm mY(Of rmf.pNL OOrrOaO m1-ma a..O mu(P NP.a nm u( mrvmNanfm r..im m0~- m .r .PNn m.p .y N.+P OOrmaONJN..O Jmmn-NOm.-~ ra .+ mr na mr mn.. m...nrn J ~i 0 ppppmmmmm voooop po a0oooo00.. ....-mmmmmmmmmf+vlrrvrvJo ?PPO?OOpOOJOOPPPpPPPPPPPPPPPPPP0000000JO000000JOOPP ~ maamao aaaaJaa arrrrrrrrrmm ,. iim nmm mom ~ YrIYY Y.f Pam' Md.mlvlt !llvrY i ~ i ix + 2 x0 Op O O O YO WJ wWU W W W W (]Or 1 rl~vi ¢J~ r-32w¢P N2! NO~n Ou i wp•+pOJnY ¢mm02 N0~2u v~ ..¢w ' ,k 2tti.i mVw _ ' -~<w SCm ~- VpF¢ SV2w Y ~ _ _ ~'6~ ~ Za~ yl. JV Z~na SVrnOJZ Wum2ri-i=Z O~nw>y0 >u>w __ i~/~mi ^ = SIjVZwZO iOQjOOOwW+'W¢uPUYU(•F IY ri G •~p rY2 r1n w2wOw O ~ m•/~R ZOO {VmSmZ1~i JViOrO •n- rLJ w{{ w¢~ ~rN rV0 VnOJ mY~JZrOV ¢i Y ¢SJ rVwrNJr¢r2r n0 wZr O ~QOwmU 4(- N¢ ~I VVV'{VSm -~00¢Za U~ 22l Y¢N~lrV11. J{ ~2pOCm.+VO~ O ~ QV •O.1 ZO•+ m0{007.+.-~r ¢¢p¢VP{•+27L OU~I ruw- roowpp+c¢ v¢ ¢>{>z.z.¢. rzNr v~. xa¢~ J>'~WUZUizo./~opiowmr-gyp{¢: x¢.-¢W ziiiz<mmziiu'wuzi 'npHa{pp{ooz .o womP~{ az..aowwwa •{opooWpwxzwwrno .•pw m iW-..rP¢n.-fia u~(x..pV.omo>a..ou~/-o¢s•.Y pa (+mnaz> Ci (.aPYPm mry P1'(-LYnPVnUOUmNPOPPVnNammP•' WPrPrvmrPm^ ?Pmar.n?L -.+N m0-mPma..G OPnmNWmr nr wrP UU~/'.nJ~ ~nOmPPmPn- uPaPOYfaVO^YdPrPf•m NVmUmmmrW a P.(~Y na.+U Y~• PrnPUO O,^.~Jmm~..UO'v OGCU.l OC~O-00'JJOOGJ m/~p OO LOrV^v rO J.+00000J0 ~~ 6~ iJ U~[.UVOV000VOOOO~aOGGOpUJUJOUV G(/G OGUOmOLOOUOGO00J0 !/9 mUn O 'ei a ¢ J ~p p o am NYH om ~ d r a n.. p z J i o ~ s n s ° +ooooornP:oo^o0..o0oppdu.prmpmPOPUpompa amcmarvma~.~ m^d ^omN.....>J..Or-+o o~n .+o^no+mNJ.•o+POa-.om adN +~ONYNmddmpJ+Omu(O dNPdd+Odm~rp PaPJO+PO+ PnnYNr m~rndL aN0-~ONrymnryNprv09pPNnOP-•m nP~N-~+N~P U1m^YH+ ^ryrvyNNryUYP~ 9 PH.nryNryYP lrwnOmF Nf^u •Vm0 .nN .r .T .r .. .~ .• N POY OI N ~ Z J J UOOOJp00 OpOJOOrym±YO pO 00000000m^OOOOOOOpO00.J 0000000 OOOOVOOOJO0000 00000000rvdO000V0000 aO ~OOOOp~~ aPpPPPPPPPaPP~OJOOPPPPPPPPPPOPP PPPPaPPP~ PpPP mcal_~mmmmmmmmmmdmm~lm ~.mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm rvmnmTrvry ~ i.ivivvi:w vii:iaaaa a.~aa 11 ~ w w zz xi x x x F2 J W ~ ° 0 0 0 '~ J J U u W W LOwu .. wi ~. wo+. ~ oWF .xYU° r in~z iri zs 's'i.-~i .Y `°J ~"~:_o w "JOa: adu ¢°a +`~w ~..z.- a., .~,', •+~ ~m"a iJO~omaii~~i a.n ~':J " a'ua wuiyw_+au„t.Z-.ud <%7602¢ >V~JSWwwOn- w •W„ 2W + ~ _ _ Oa6n<w~-OU%ul 'wN ~ .°LLJOO 20 •J 221- 2~J NV r GO .u 6LJ¢LI'J i'Z¢ J>OwOw2n¢Fw.]<IOC Vi .-. •rOVJI ^Z G• jwwWwl-y °¢ OPU:] ZU~+uJ Yd0 ~J ~ wJZ'Y w0r1~% Ow ~ • n •Z < u't ~~~>Zl um~+ .+ Zwu 6 uj02.n¢¢6 W-•6 wRm¢w.~LNwu 6 YO:CnOP i1 G U+u<O¢J ZZ~+OZ " ~ wV J ~. .J aJ~.r 1~+Mr6nw^N ~'-.Z 2.~uV'- 22=2Ywwl.n26 ~<iY •~LZ 1 LLu.J..OZ O~nww ZJ6S ¢L 6w±v~.l2 Tat UNJwaw~ y :OV6 e O+ hjuN w~..~ 00¢ui1 .n°< «viw6 6m p O~ t<1>m>~n .Ltt>2L}>v O u¢lOmVUO¢Oli2¢1-a UYUImYOpp0+61+mPaC °~ my,V mV NUmJn+FYOn~PPVa~Gd min aIUrLPYm JrO L6 rvOmmm~Pa r f1 C. .+4 C. ~. ~4Uw ru dNWNdm~p u~PdN 1-1-Pnrr ^ Y.rf ppY mPn n' J.JJC IwOU•Ja dm V.•~-PP nP G(1P YY..O mOn^rvwmr .~ J IOJJOOJ000u.-O UGJJ4 O;J .]000J O.~O/00-.U ~uJ w 6i r(J (. ;J U'J [. 44JUGJU.^.4VUpOOJ0000Upu4UVOUOVOOUVOOUV~:UU iao _O ¢ O~ OOwrvmOJJOO a.D rvnOmOJV00¢~vOO+NmVJON~ PDUmrm•'~m OmV+N P•~mJmPmOOmnPOna^nr mom na.+OVrn -+mwm Jah.+i °D°in~•+•[`•.n oonrvmmawP +m mm+n~amno-.P noa n mnnaamn ..+mann.•~r .. u P n mo wm..a ~mN•T4aNm•'•O JmUmrv ~no~rvinn°o°u+°¢°. ¢°.m ..m m .+ ^m^mN P n,m[•m.•.m[•mm•mv+iii+ii`+•ii°o°D°oo°ODO°o°o°o°°oooo°o°o °o .°~°D°oo°°u°D °ooo°oo°~°D°oo°a <°as°a°-°auoooooooroommmmm~P+mmPm ~mnnmmmmnn n~P+n mmnm Pnn~P..nn~P..m lip Rio iaiiiaaoaimoo `oiaoiomavuc°:"'iii+a+i:aii i'°°:ai+i+ I~~ I L = _ ^ c n xi ¢ x x i D _ u w .. i xG. ..° _ ..i-a ¢J'..f .¢w ~~VZ 3Vw fWS.n Vmr Zr. =0 azwr ia¢w•~°~ ^¢."~. moo i fzor 3i'.n ..iz ~= om¢i Do wu>~.^i 'a• Hof.=^ ~ ¢ - ~ iii o¢`¢.°." oo=azi°¢=m~ uoDJU¢n¢u ~a.~ooi~wa o~:iz ¢'zz]D'io. ~.° owo ai¢°n~l.•f ..nr ~z]•-~m~ Or <t Ifv~ ~OwfLL<LL vRf V•' NOwV0.mw~ nSJOZ ii s.~W..m rx n no u...o.~p6w uz~ wu•'.•~ ~ i _ ¢i2 -O Nn6~ LLC]ury i~ nZ]1 rpwiwa nUSLL'L•+Z ~Z{Z ZUZnJUUK1Z V •+H OuU~u ww0~~2 wJZ ¢U=l •~. wZOw6wnrv•n YTS-•~S~¢O~[ KUUmU~w •-•0.2]ZZZw e20r00.~I~Z6 r6 GKn•+•0.0.f¢000f UV ¢~V •^U ¢¢ +76 iV Owl•••~OwOw N'.iV VVLO¢f Df ~. ¢~L SOU O•^-I~rLLJlf^fi^Dm-v~~nmw O+•V -`WPmn.-~UU~J P+h n0 mhrn m0+ n tO PV ¢ainu •+.+.On mmPmnmPmm~n.n PO+ ~'(.G OU UNOPnu m,mn I I -•L.iUP vGmOV.+min .-•+0 PVaWU'N ~.Ua m OUJ GUVJ(.•000GJI .+00•u-•OU•'~J 000"GOJ •+VO 4i (^u.i0[~~J••C UUGUJJUU.U'UOO U•JGOJVUO':I .JO GJUOCVVOUJOOVOO C: C.O (~/ PU'mOJhOOUmUmbNrvmmry~NjmrOVOOYrvNOJYmmwO000POaa0 0 OpYOw Ora u~OVOmOraOJ.~m wPOUOJOOwJO NPhmml•In YrOPrypa. ~rvhrv ~wwmrvmmrv.yOONmPJOPrv W~-Pmu~00JNOPwO ~- 1•Im mmul0 aa:NS^aPl~mmah..ammmrwmY^'mONNmPmgVPOau(O m O It~d a.+Pw Y. O.ym~y din Jhu~ w w w w rv'In m w m 0000000000000000000000000.~~'.w w.r ...~w Nnryryrym~±~+mmmmmmm OOOp00p000000000000000000 mmmm m .nYYY1YY PPpSPPPPPmP?PPPp PPPPPP~PP000u000U000000000 m m^min maaaa a~-~-~-rri-rr~-F~-r o Yem a:PLaa YYPYa aaooa:PauoooauiiooooYC a`ao<mouoomaai<aa~.wJ^~~n ~n wx~-U ximJYO<.n x u.J emu. ZNr- wr OU-IV ~vwU ~w wUiZi ¢VUtiOhU ~ ~. -O2f ¢SN Ni nOY2~n2ww~w wZ2~¢~ww¢¢O>r~ I ~Jw Y.t 2 O>7 - o%O <J w)¢¢VS 2K4=3w SIJ-.V ¢W63~6 O I ~ ~: YiJa S I.`.V ` W _ Jn .. P.J _-J~.. <<N a4 a ...<Lm u... WwOPZ¢u I .Z..~~i 7G a.-.-pa V¢¢ wV i.w-~Or ~mmVOm~ZUw 7 wpoU U O S~ I Uiw2 ~ Y:UJUwOUZU.O¢ OJ in¢ul0 22wZJ22 wV awZ Jil a2 R~-.%APxI-~n < 2 <wwOOJO U <Z ~^I Va~u¢ ...10a tu. Iw<OJJ •a~«6 ww T240JZ w r r~~wu~ Z o~ -arm Jao2 waax~JaWU..uw wr-.-~' ioo:o+ - ~"u Wml- orc~ hwso ¢aJ ~~ x¢~°S]{ N» Leo - s J .'-mow o-~i iu" tioo¢ .xicw o-.am IN-^ua.¢.u iw..au .-~viw nw.-..> ~ wow ~FiW ~ww a x wag J..¢.wha ~w,Je .- z or..a r~Ji¢z: a~~w.~~omw rU6%rwin¢w~n Jan 6u1 a O<`6w0{{<OUO<WZ%PN L~nOZOZiO Y.m wOH~: ur LwOww inpUn„¢ '.u Oa(~ 6%ti J6 Z20Za001Jx a<a.. a ryr->jwa vim GO~.Ow mL¢¢aFV~rypw6U0¢m~~+Vnn6 V<mJa ma v. ~iNV W YOmYYhGNau~wPYU.YYm.~wm yNmNUr~ln C:alNU Oru• ON~;hY ..UnnmGmwNm O.-~~-YP(.aimm~"'a wyPrv( Pm ry0U UfVNVP vymQPa YmPYOmmYmPmu~ i •uu O~: ~-'JJ t)G JJ•J ~+'~l .. J.+OJ000OOJ OmmJ00000^UJ'JOOJO ~~ f. U,_~- OVVU'JOOUJVOOVUO.i OUGJOU00U0(ViJ 000VO000U00000(iJ0 Paz a i ~i `z' U V ' Q pl P P U OU~OHOmVJOWPrvrOmdOn~.NON rvOPmOmpYnympVryPw ;0„ONOPnnmmmMmONCNTNrmn N0N^~~+ 1.1P0 ° .. ..r m .. n N .. mY ~i ~ ~ V~ ~ mmmmmmmmmmlY l.f •f ¢Tl~IY f•J pO0o000000000000000u000 1 n'n oa.`~aaaio~iaoaoa u.oa o'L iai i Si i i ii SFn C Y r~KLL .~ Q O O 200 .J ii¢ .. ptJV J'JO rmrZ+Y ~~~Ot~n n3 ex~(-a Wiz: ai zm piw ~iiOO ps.`. ~c~ V~ Q6n vttf¢pw i>¢ W,.~.w-w r~nowi °i JOi Zp ~t o.[0'P Li¢(wrwnn ppZJO rV wuyOrVQFiOLOwt¢fm nOr ... i.n ~c-~z vwP2 au i WWU ¢VO .+ Oww> UZ~ mOwnmwO./w¢O~+YZHO f~w..oiirv ~f oirv.~s a-ro .J.n°an„~rw nr.,, ~-JSOp¢f mP-pe mry¢PU¢'O P.+Qt O)NymOrvPOy mNM.mPrv VLOrv~wL~+ ~~PnP N~nP P JGGUOO VO i~Oy OOO7UOUOOU00 .. 00 Op000UVUU0U0UOp m YOY r.r O~~OOmJOOn a.u n w PmOpJau~inYONYU~1-YmrvNUmJN •0lOlnmOlw N.+mrvPyOy u VNOJynnwNnPLamry o r .. w.. a o..yLOrvm ,r n 0000°00000°DOOUO~+~m.-~n.n .-r .+ PPPPPOPPPPCOOTPPPPPTPPTP mmmmmmm~mmmTmmm ml.lmmm +miaoya oomao r Z 3 w0 O O i. W r- V f QnZm2 O oi~Pi m..e w~V. suosao~a imi" ~ iz ~i° c <~ J SwZN=0u=r00 ¢ JZYwnwJ °r LL O¢S •LL':w0>39NOYUV00 •y+ ~ i i22~ LL¢h¢QlwR .¢CJt[6 ~VZwLLyJ rr2 mV Jr-.Gmj ¢f0 »306 Z~-.w Znr ~i(fr~>lS~ sL3moYOn~..cp.nf °u>sN¢wNapr rLm.o., .. m ...p+mrrn.. LNYNrym OOmnpOwmmN¢OmnOP~O OOOOOOOOOU0000V000000000 ~a3 O O J' X11 .+G J rvaa WOm Ymn^m O•]OnmmONONrmryNmJ~PO++OOU p pOPOP0000•+aYnJ m NPaNmP000 nnOaO^mnOmm^mm.•.n+nOU mOamOmOOVmm mJ "i°-'~m~-n r..morJnrnonmm..am a~-aoYOnpnoa mammomomn rv..WJ 0 o mramrvnoomamaJrmr omNrP m m~nroJ m PJ~NV nYma-Pnmr ~+ r m .r n m ^ m ^ n mOp Nm -~ 2~ J; UI z mmry~+YrmFnOJOOVrvm^nn ..m mmmmmm NVOOOOO O.y^^^^~+m n.+^ o mooouoa o.n+o oo.~-..•--•»^-.^-^^-•-~aca aaaa aaaammmmmmmammmmmmma~mm ":ii misi a.~aion;oa arYC m°ca auYaom,yd wt CW ¢ ~n 4 JO> Y> uJ .SLL F~l ?... __,n pia ¢,. is o s._ _ ViV _ Z;U=Jp•» °¢~n>r ti OO >/iw2mm22 .ZiN J.~-iy rc~nr r Uwm°V1V~n Ill U222V ~Od Z,n° .w,^w '-NV W~-wWF.v 2 J'J~Oti ~n ia.+~--n O r- ~J¢ r¢~-w.~N ~- r~Ww m >.~ ~nIVJ VIW •LLVl J U VOl2.n ~n SU •oC w{f 6 nLrwlS>O~n .n Ol ^m~n ¢.-.O VwuU¢ wlw JSY-^ 622FJZ~n¢Yl F¢ i 2voo°wuz¢oz¢<x~nj zoLLaoox¢ a:~ nsrazi~JU J.ono~ou °~ou i~ia:uuiJndtiu° nrv mmmYrvaP rnO rin+ •+V ii.n~NnannJPrvmnmmmmPry++ Y~ PYwn mUVU~UONnNn~+aY OOU ~UOVP0000^-•.+m000mOOpmmVO-' J-~C O.]OOJ000JOOOOOOOOOOOOOVOVVOUGO On PvY J P nPUJ U On P mOJ O m ON„ mPOOp w n ry m .- O m m .~ P m m J a ~+ PPPPP Ji+..Hmmmaa mooo~ao o.. ouoa n-..naa aza maam6m uaaa aaauaa .. z~ ¢ C w w_>~ ll¢ - ~ I~ m¢J ~x°¢wz <.-..¢ie i.. ^ wo.w.i= wa u.~oo Z .+2 Vi-~>ZSOww LL wJ~-iO~wrwOlwww -~v V_lV V~u F6nnJ w'.u J ZJw>N~J^ .n6 R 100 V~'Sz w plNFl~~ owLaoo~:,o~ooLLoo L^VLLVU¢¢NVVO22 u~JNP m~++Jw m.~rry n ~mmnurnY NF PJN mJOGUUmpU00GOJ OJOGUUGGVOOUGU /~ I P I n ~ •• u• n 4 O O •in0 •u f W P y a LL~ r1 O P ~+ U Om0 OJ a w P m+n i m .. In rv o W a n n .. n e 1 rv n n o I 1 J o °J GJn~UO +ONOmnW+rvJnNOOna+ JOO'J O OOOJONON J.I P ~OWyOPmU~"nnannaOh+P JwpO JPn0110m.pJ + aOP !Oa'n nP.+n anVy OPaPU~mOmrU m <iammmmNmmna+unP aPw + nn nmm~n nrvynnn Wr :Pr i P H N rvnnn mPnrv y p I .~ ^ P J Q~ V ~ J I O I p00O0O00O0O0U0aammm r'+! OOOJOaOOOOUnnI++ it rvNn OOOOOOOnnn ayaay PPUPPPPJPPPPPPOOUOO UyLJ OJVOOOOOJy aaa0w I NNnhn aiiiWmi s~oaa o.i oo~ is o~i as oar +i+vi: iii J~JJJJOJ .. n.r n.. .. .~n-~n..nnnnnnnnnnn..r ~r..n rvNNNryrvrvryNN xS xi I ~• Y n C .C Z x o a -. I s a ..~.~ n .>,~ I i _ i .- I O 2V0 V<w I r;] IL I<i w ~OUwxOjLV w 2¢x00 • mS w ~ •~a Sp u1Z n n VL~ ~ V6 iy r OK NI~J NNJ O<n O Z4 OVwwVU+w P.~n Z w2 J2 wZ L~OrXwO26 N`-<n0w7f J NV az w an..wwaa xLL a, w ,. w ¢~ .. i'2- ax"oanJx< .i.~~o.a--~.- wi za.~:' r¢-in wo nJa~. a<ooW v >x oou ~a~ww z~uNiu VJROw~~'[~lm~LLwUn SRV 02xw0 uiw6RwN] Z~+nV J JJ °T ~e z~a..p: °. .. Him a as 2 2N XJN ~JUrONUi N9P <ZK~ 23A<JJLLO UGb CIy 0ON J0 aUnSRf<J ~Ow0 wOJO w.ux0O Vn6 PYn .pwnJnNttpni ~nJa~! VV~`~^ YV6nN]UNa 0i eyuia ynrPmaPr rP`• PPn 100-~+Nm VI-W ^OhPn y.L aP a'pn 11 ~.W PPL PNP p~PUPrOPPPVPynrrr nar., UJOOnOOnJUUnVJGJUJ JUJ OOmV000'~O ui 61 IJV:~U aI OJOG[. OOOJOOGOOOVOO OLOU pOGGO0UV0 ~~d V +o of o ~`f • • •;e(e O ! > a O uU ry6m Ja N m •J a.-n •+ Nm P m~nnN ^ m m n v O r u' p m N .. N N u. w N t r P V J O S O h ~ f~ OI ¢~ OO ~GJOGONYrNPJO~-VO •~ OOmUJOwnaOJUY arrOOJPNNV000JOw OOOJJPmmrvPmOmN~n O UOaGJwOmmmOmPmmmnOOJUm~JmwO.+V~ JO^au~O JmPaNrynOY~rv N Ua~~00nPmmOmNY m•+NinO yrnn•~r r..aOm o•-PNaP rmYOaornanrnmomm~nNm .. o~~ omm No.. rvm .+YO~mN .. Nm ..~ mmoo.....rmrvNNmtiN..Y O..P mammm o n mno °c •- mm m ii ~~ ammmmmmr oo oruovo~o~~.m.~a~ao mmvm mmmmmmmm oi'oiaaiWiJauaaaii aom ararJ i a pz•~r o i us< s o0 a ppr¢ p Qu ~T¢ C Oy 2¢2 ~nr Lq O_(^ O_p l'wY _ N 2 aOLL )U uw ..p >2p O - m ~•L •+ VVFnCw w ~O•-Z p0 ~ <~2az:~nl>rnw'~i s opw>i Joo•.•~a°n ~+S n¢nU¢ul OU2 VUKn~.6 f.~ ~PGP PPn rvu•O J - mrmP rNmm ~A~ ~ NJ~GG~ 'nV .~JO w 4~ UOvuOGOJOGODUL.i00 Jm Onn nnNnNmmmryrynmonTmmmmmmm _.. ..n mamm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmwmmmwm Mmu aoaa a•oa mim;;u sauiii me as nnNryNnNryryry.rrv rvrvryrvnrynrynrvrvrynNNNnN .' W r• r N¢ Z r S W Owe ^ ry K•n W~~[¢ snuff "•a on °oo ¢l~~m 2 y0sw V .. y Asa O 21 wZ Nti ¢I.ImV 9~w1. W210'O.w.•J TL Z ~- J w r P uZai wWtiw OnYO >YiY>~ > t9 u tVSO J1 ZFU K~ wL 6Z wY r¢ m2mtW1'w 2v Ow¢w2 wf•+ u m~jwOm<iwY ¢ Yw: ynn¢ Ln ~' a±N Q V+• iwl UZ 00<Y Z oo ., z• pw>w< r p.. zpti rip w .nz¢www~c pw x rm~WF .z ~.wu -om~wooow:Jar a°a eo pwnu a o°n ~ia.•". a•w-•ioi~(io~o~ioa~ •w oi~ SJ¢V6uN(pUUNV r•nJ02•nJmmVJpJ¢V4n rOrva Om mnmrnmmpru.mPPPWOOmmmrrPa r PPPmPmamJPaNrNrmWra Jrymmnm n.~• Pu.r..mJaP.yrv~J.Owm.`.Y aYwP Pita aryNJN J UOJ OOJJOOV pOmmmmmJOOJJmmpO-~O G JOOUJUUUJOOUJOOVJUOOUGOOJUO ~a~ a V J O~ .l ~ u i o . . o e .. . e . . Po o~ o omo c D P OG4 NU N O P a m0 n P J b rv NO n dU mG n ¢~ n m ..O ~o N v n N J m - N .. .. O O J O O O .~ c V rnO00 J J ~V ~ P m O JryOnO V mJO O U OO ~ Jn UJ OmV 00 nOmOJ JO JUtVrOUtd OJJVPOd000Y4t0 OYOJJOmO O N n00 O raONVNOanmutmJPWYt S~UNOOwmdO y400mOdV -ry N w00 Fut9-m nJ n ONm Ned JrvO-NU~JNOn mrn±dm0„Jry„l.~nnn maFOYnONO NJrY mN mOV N mNY P P N . n n n .. N .. N N .. .. .D. mmmOONNJJaddddm m~R wNNmm PPmJJJJJtd 000000 n.+N.-~.4 n., ~r n.~n~nnNNryryrvN aaaama d d a aadaaaaaaaaaaaaa uo°°.=~N. P.m o0 oooJOa m m mmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmm m~ rm a~iaioa a o m i d` ou coa: m aauii + : au aa i . o i , i o a m '. JJJ.' i.f JN o < °i i ~ vi i° N : ooooc o nNao U ii ~ . < ii ` 6 r o i r ` - u'Y y0 iT ~SUJ - 2 u22000 - > u _ _ .-o DD' Nz~~ro :i ~ .. -u`~.`~z '~z tom .- o z zw ~-. a" ozz<-z D LZL- zL o m o ~'.ii y LL'u V u7J fli-U U'wrJ SIJU <w J < j < 7 fOU ><V OSn OZVt3!'12 w2 u -IZ ODUUN> u u O°° ¢ u )! "LUG °'On -V RLOZOO-~+ e-<ti 2 L~ mf< p2 Z ,- wZVwi O uJw "i~anzo max' .l ni rz~i~~-ooa~na 22 inUVU.n2 <« LL< m w°u~tJ u<w UJy V wZ°¢RO ~ U ->Z w ~l w2 u.Un-r-n Z GOS¢U Lr -v~tlL U 20<GZ O12wORZPO OSOZUOS k'wZnk pOCOPRw00-PO O([22ZVJ wK0000-w V6 wUU6 JwRS4 VuiJ <<RVM1V°V LL4U662-n>n~+ N °u UU>S <u ~S<n6 1 +~Lr^ mm O.+r J`/V VPP WPO UP S~ NLmrv a~nOnmdJY~O^VPP dOitN- mmYtN LNNVPGPWW aJ a mOV J'Pm n..JP JL PdmPJ OLPOm u~ 6i O -U-G OOOOVVOU0000-OnUJ UUV~V ~~OOOOVOUOJOOUOUOU000 n0'JNmm00 JUOJJO000 pU mONmO 00000 ia~ V a 2 Y O a • • a a a .,• J e ~ ~• 0 1 O O j ly a a i J P V U P O 0 J O! O Y O m ~ J o rv ° .. °~ N a o ~ .. iN W .. ., rv .. N ~ .P. i i I I o i v n o o N N J ~~ w w JoJYrvow p..o Y Noooo r umonwwoouoo oWn Yam .JO4.OJUh00n•u• 0 UONO JOUPJ••+000Om ajmhn ~'1 ••OmmP~•N p NNNON p yy i00rvJ0a • ml NO~Pmm.-•j~Ory r, 0rp0 ~ P~ nOIn 4•nd NNw~c ^ tr.mn L u• 0 r V O n W•'•P ~'^ ^'~ rv P m ^ N ~• N .n P O I V u• JI UI nNN O•- P PPryOry JOOOJD00000mmYY± 0 OpJ 0K~w0^wmd mn .•r• DOpOUONNNNhJY rv O PPP mmmmmwawmm~w COL OHO ~O mmmmw PPPPPm0000000000 auawunnnnn : O mmm n N aooo~o°°.•m °~~°••°n °n .J..n °On mr°•J.. a YJY m0 VY I ~ rv rvhNrvNrvNN rvNN hN NN mmmmmmmmmmmmm mm Ya JYv I L n D _ V vl y 0 Y V 2 i O •~ I _ ~ R>U 00 3 s< °¢ D< a d ~a Go zL~g J wOw2 , w~2 i m U ¢ O .n w~~•1~N i.w L.~ i O S ut Ow¢¢w O Z 2w. . UwO_OF O W< V 000~r • D_ O O_ i2 •J ~~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ L Ui Z •%•-~J y~ OwV u n Y 2 u 1•iJr2¢ah 0 ¢ w LL V u w U ~u n iL O U2~-•L xx w~wJ ¢ ~~ ti U Vw OOw orc..~o au.-LL wJao Z bw D JJ¢ S ~ yt LLOn •~wtt0 UwrW O I l.2in _ _ ~ 0 U rl= J U JLL VhOJ ~' < d¢ O VZL OFOww12w .I Jw m wry .p p J 9 ¢ Jm~-NZ 2> S [0iw2 LL1¢ODG o r FV ~ 22U 6COwk UwZw J~wu•SLOV~16 `i 7jj w ~i~aiiu~Oi°J°rc m..~~~ iv°o,°~maowuuu .S.:ii Jx w~.x hhh M1f mW ~m n J~O Y: J Y PGPh J0 m u a .pN .• UOn nnmY mJY NW n N~nPLO~ yPnmP m 00 ; J.m JOUOn•nm OOb JOOJJOOO~OOOJOOU 0 0 OOJ w o.l i. C.uVJ000UOG OGO00 UOUGOOOOUOOUJO00 0 O OUV /~ V J R OI ¢~ ~ 4 • P ~ ~ • • • a ~ n ry m m P p O O O w a O O N N m ry a rv .' rv n a i U .+ .) a a a O - U ~ in ~ T m M u .' .e O O O O U U p U O O O nOnryry~p °~y rLVPO bOmJbON4bb00 O OUOUON ~P.pp~n maa mOT O.v0 Vb000~+'b N+ Ob000m u~PY na Ha n ti w bYmbfNaaOYnU P iYnmO.n-~ of ~ b T r ~~ V~ V~ bbmPPP bN Omb MY`rlYYr brv~bbm ~ 00000 NU Op p PPPDD00000 OUOOOC! ~a°oWaaai is maa . aaaa n ~ ~ oaooouoo 00 ~ ~ °pn n ~%v~nnN,b.~nnn - NnYnNirvnnN iaaYac iioooo Y:Y:v++Y v: i+ + nnnnr-..nn~nn mmvvmm " "' i i r - G 0 "°u u i o.J.xio "r ~G ua iii i ~`ni i i ~ Gi Lavin i ¢Z~~y _ ¢ r~Z _ 2 _ m~0 ~3 OZZUOY Z r ~- _ r- ~- i 1 n r- ~ O O O CYGL< LY ZZtiO7w 2 2 ~)bw~mJ¢ Zw< O u h6 OwL,aO iw L LL G~Z ¢tt 6 tI LL JwJZr J sz~° .. ~.. w ~. zGO a'rG ~w~° ins ~zz~ as a mix°.~r ~z ~~iz w~= uw ~ ac< sx~a~ a-<~oa~ iv of a ~zisxxL~~o ~~o a<aO 1m .-zW z.~ cwiz z n'iarcnw~W ~aN xTnwo w6O n+~N w<< r27 ON Yp of i:¢eL »: ., v°~ ~ a~uuo.~.orc.....as ..<uaxr m PPmn n.. aPi- mopaY ao.. ntpP ..ru mwmm~nrm mm nim rva~aY..omm~n PP.~.~Pn 1~ NbP ~~ .DOO NPbWNnTN b.+P DYarba VJ ~. JGO O~ 000 O OmOVOCJOJOJ.) OJTOOT w R~ VO~GOil00 00 000 O OOOOODUOOOOJ 000000 !~? 9 ~ • . • • • . • • n w < n J o ~ D p 6 O O O O j O Op f O O J O O O N n0 p p J Z 9 rv rv N rv r r r m ++ N~ O m ~ r t N N P p n f ^ O 7 u O O J U_ O pU G ¢ D u n o n a D ai u; I V j O J mpOpO p OrVOnaJ O OO GUN m•+O el O OJO O ~OJOO O O +OOaPrN.+p O pNmvOY O 000 rl B O O •0000 ~ O in OONN+mNO O nONmrnOP N O N •N G D0000 NryPaNdmJ N~a nN+ ~ niPN 9 n OVOO ~r1m 00 T .naOrP TNa OI rv rv ry nN00 ~ n r m Pm m .p N p n n nNm N N N ^qN P r r+r J U J WmNOq O O 1 P O OOJOO i a a~aaa P i u auaai o +~+ uouaa ~O m LmgOm w 11 NJw m ou FY 2 O ~+ n O LL a •~ i i JS¢¢ ~ Z I Z ~ i v. {- Lu JOOJU O O 6 I J n ~ ul iJU J J C~ u u w2Yy u m u O N ~ 7 wOO wuwio V OI T pwOVO J z 1 o ww> o <iw ¢ s s nppo¢ a i mP00+ U 11 P .+POm 6 J + 00 a ~ -~ J 00000 O mryUmmmmND mmm00000 hry~~NNNry hrvryNn p mryn UOOOUOOUV 00000000 P OUO aa•oaaaaac aaaaaaua aaa NNNrvhNNn NNNNNNNN riivr± i'O: Ilil w0wWa00~D PPTP p ONmmOWwmw mw0W0mwm P PUS ww ¢w r n 0 U N¢ U¢N ¢pj VJ _ UZ N2 < V 2V wU u u wz< N,w.i JR '~'.~. W ~2 ZJ O w2 22V OUN R NO ~ZS O r O wN p O 2 U ¢d' Z UOZZ K ? 2 2w2 2 2 Vw tw u n .u ~t 20 LL OUO OF22YQ O w¢f u w2r >pWrNN~ N1~>Or J~'p Tw^r~+J 06 2ir.~>c a.ri zxs zn¢ Npr ~xwzw usNao~WW >pw<p1yN o00 a~iopl-ass `~rcoisv..o u u..u JnNF+NPN„ Odm+mP^In n rY~+ ^OaOmyPOJ PV~00 w OSO pmOOpOD ujODUm^m UOOOOOODO OOUODD O JOO / ~O .:. ~o P O O V J ~ ~ O 1 m O P OI I I J000:]O'f0 OJNJrv00 Nom P P O ml annN P.ay00 U P O 1 ~ V• n P T 2 S j O 2 R J mm JOOOJO00 aaaaaaaa "+++airr°.ari P PPPPPPP e 21 6i J F ~Vw ~ ~ _?u nJ1 < W O w-~ LL O l OW uJ6L O ~ ~n2~ ~Z u r Z JM 2 yJ<LOS 0t a; U0 P J wO ' E vi2 WO 202 ~ ~ ~ U tm ~ PPPOPPPP JOGOUO~O /~/ DATE; October 7, 1987 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT T0: Mayor City Cou ncilmembe rs "~~~ ~ FROM: Mark Lorimer, Senior Administrative Assistant YYIR.~.I''[~ SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR FOUNDATION STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the hire of one part time administrative intern as support staff for the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation and City business in an amount not to exceed 55000 for the remainder of fiscal year 97-88. Budget allocation would be provided through a transfer of funds from the City's unallocated general fund to the administration part time salary fund, account number 01-4122-1300. BACKGROUND The City Council will recall discussing this issue with the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation as a part of a special joint meeting on September 16, 1987. At that meeting, the Board of Directors submitted for your consideration a job description and are outline of responsibilities for the Administrative Intern. The Board of Directors has completed its mission statement and goals and objectives for the next twelve months and finds an essential need for a part time administrative intern in order to achieve the established goals and objectives. The attached job description and outline of responsibilities provide complete information as to the duties of the administrative intern. The Board of Directors respectfully request the City Councfl's approval of this part time position and the continued support necessary for the Foundation to achieve its tremendous goals. Should you have any questions or comments rega rd ina this request, please contact me at your convenierc e. ML :Ir Attachments l3z RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION Job Descri Dtion - Administrative Intern The Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation seek a qualified Administrative Intern to assist staff with the following tasks and responsibilities: 1. Prepare coorespondence relating to Foundation business. 2. Prepare and update comprehensive cultivation listings for business, corporate and individual gift campaigns. 3. Prepare and maintain prospect and cultivation records. 4. Plan and coordinate special events and fundraising activities. 5. Coordinate the Rancho Cucamonga Community Calendar, a toint protect between the City and Foundation. 6. Maintain 91ft records and process gift acknowledgements. 7. Coordinate public relations efforts for the Foundation and prepare press releases and other related informational materials. 8. Respond to inquiries regarding Founda tton hus mess. 9. Coordinate and prepare Foundation meeting materials and information. Septebmer S, 1987 /ml /3~ A 0205 ADMINISTRATIVE INTERN Defini Tion This is o part time entry level professional administrative staff work assisting a department head in the preparation of reports, special analyses and the support of on- going programs. Under supervision, on employee allocated to this class is responsible for providing assistance in carrying out special projects, supervising or coordinating specific assigned programs and attending to administrative details. Work includes a wide variety of tasks designed to relieve a department head of details by review of mater(als, assembly of factual information and the iransmittol and Interpretation of management actions. Work may also involve responsibility for tha development and maintenance of assigned programs. Work is reviewed by observation, conference ord analysis of reports. Examples of Work Confers with the department head concerning operatiorwl problems and subjects requiring procedural or policy review. Conducts assigned research, procedural and administrative work or studies; prepares reports containing proposed or recommended solutions or courses of actlorn. Participates in 6udgel reviews and In the development of departmental budgets; attends budget review meetings. Represents the department head as delegated; relays instructions and information. Monitors assigned departmental operations statements and programs and advises the department head of problems or variances from planned objectives; analyzes complaints, follows up and furnishes public information. Performs related work as required. Desired Qualifications Graduation from rnllege with a degree in Business or Public Administration and some experience in municipal administrative work; or any equivalent combination of education and experience that produces the following: Ability to design, conduct and analyze research findings. Ability to write clear and concise reports. Ability to communicate effectively with management. Ability to establish and maintain effective wo:king relationships with other employees an }he public. 2~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: October 7, 1987 T0: City Council FROM: Beverly A. Ad he t City Clerk .~ Additional information with a new contract will be attached under separate cover. Said information was not available at the time the Agenda was being assembled. 133 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA •~'~ MEMORANDUM '~ E Date: September 17, 1987 ~`-' To: Deborah Brown, Council Member From: Bill Holley, Community Services Director Sub~act: Requested Infcrmatior.: Windrows Park/School Per your request, here are some basic facts surrounding the proposed use agreement between the Etiwanda School District and the City for use of the park by the school. • The District requests a 'closed, exclusive' use of approximately 3 1/2 acres of Windrows Neighborhood Park, a public facility. • Tha requested exclusivity from 7:30 a.m. until 0:00 p.m. on school days, and assuming a 180 day school year, would mean 1,570 hours of public closure at Windrows park. The District will make available for public use the hardcourt play area to the east side of the school ' us'... ,mh:e i~ vhn+~o hhn n<rtnf iaTinn hort_inc...fh at 15. What specifically constitutes the 'plus'.) Previously, staff had proposed the 'plus' be only the cost recovery of maintenance of what the school used. The Council directed that the 'plus' be increased. To that point, the District has been amenable to making available school facilities at their standard user rates, copy attached. In terns of city use, we could envision a likely use during school year of 9 hours per week of a multi-purpose room a school, probably windrows, or, to a much less degree, occasional use of the Gymnasium. If that ba the case, that the District wishes to charge the City for use of their facilities as it would any other group, the City could charge the District the same as we charge for use of municipal facilities. A word of caution, however, we do not currently charge for use of open space, only electricity for sports fielfl lighting. 134 Windrows Park/School September 17, 1987 Pages Two Therefore the charge would have to be based on an arbitrary value for how much 'exclusivity' is worth. With that in mind, Deborah, you really can place any value on that exclusivity you wish that achieves what the Council desires. For example, you ,may wish to make an even trade...City use of school facility at 9 hours per week x 52 weeks x $8.00 par hour ~ $3744, and therefore 15]0 hours exclusive school use of the park divided into the $7744 charge to the City for school tacility equals say, a rate of $2.50 per hour for exclusive use of the park. This brings it to a 'wash' situation. The City uses the facilities at 'no' charge. If Council wishes to exact a larger toll lrom the District, simply raise the 'axcluaive' use per hour from 52.50 to whatever. SH:bs ~~J Et~°da P.O. Box 248, EliwarMa, California 91739 Q11) 89}2451 ETIWANl11 SLI+('i01. DISTRICT USE OF SCHOOL FACILITIES FEE SCHEDULE WffN FEES AIDE CHARGED SCHEDULE I -FOR [lfILD-C0."NECTED GROUPS SUCH AS BOY SCOUTS, GIRL~SCOUTS~ LITTLE LEAGUE. 4-H, ETC, YAiICH ARE CHARGING NO FEES OR ADMISSION FOR THE PARTICUIM FEETING, PER HOUR A. GYMJASILM E13.00 B,~ AUD(TORIIM 8.00 'C. BASEBALL FIELD 16.00 (WITH L[t~iTS) 'EXTENDED USE, SUCH AS LITTLE LEAGUE SEASCN, WILL BE ESTABLISHED UNCER A SEPARATE CC"liRACr, SCHEDU_E II - FGR cHILn-CCit1ECTED GROUPS suai as Bov scours, uinL Gwu,.~.• :.r"LE ~. ~.r-r',I~ ~-~'~ FT!' WHIfN ARF CHARGING FEES OR ALMISSION~FOR THE PARTICI;LAR P£ETING, A. GYMULS[LTA 25,00 B, AUDITORIUM 16.00 C, BASEBALL FIELD zA,OO WITH LI QiTS) SCHEDULE III -FOR OUTSIDE ORGPNIZATIIXJS WHICH ARE NOT FORDED SPECIFICALLY FOR THE WELFARE OF STllCENTS IN THE ETIWPNDA SCHOOL DISTRICT. A, GYMJASILM S~[O,N001 B, AUDITORIUM JJ,W C, BASEBALL FIELD 60,00 WITH LIGHTS) Catlelon P. LighHoot ~ ? 9uperimendenl d W 9o~M of Trvabn R. G. (Jerry) Breslau Gary R. Collins Davitl W. Lonq Marshall 8. Pruitt Cecilia Solorio ^ ~ W a ~ N O U t~ ~ ~ p a^ >- U .~ n W .^ ~ ~ p ~ U7 ~' U 1 - to H Z O } T ^ LL; ~ LL ^ E" ~ Z O w c] w O ~ w p = ~ 1 p ~ / N a O O = ~ O L m a E. ~ a 2 } W Q N ~ Z a N w 3 3 ~ p z ~ W F Y ~ < ~ ~ ~ w w ¢ a W a U cn ^ c7 _ .J Z .i 7 . a r fn ~ ^ w w V w ^ 3 ;~ c) ... w .J w ~ ... o w ~ cn ¢ a ° Z Z ~ W p Z ~ w -' ~ J F- n . p `° p ~ ~- x a Z O O N U ^ O U U z ¢ y ~ Q ° p y } ~ ~ p ~ a Z o ~~~o ,~~. p 3 o ~, °; = y U a i' W T p g w y 9g ~ Z w J a W o ~ = a z ~ Z O F- Q w a O O U ~. p } O W O } Y Z Q 2 F /3~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAi~IONGA ~~~Ho ~ STAFF REPORT ~~ ~•~ ~~ r ~~~ ,; Cil z >'' C 2 v i D > i Date: September Z, 1987 is%% To: Mayor and City Council From: Hill Holl ey, Community Services Director Subject: Discussio n of Agreement with Etiwanda School District for a .joint Use Agreement between the City and the District for use of portions of Windrows School and Windrows Park for each agencies use. RECOMMENDATION: Discussion item only, staff requests Council direction. BACICGRODND: In June of 1980 iris Victoria Community Plan was formally submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and entered the public hearing process before the City Planning Commission in mid-September of that same year. The process of City review oP the plan was completed through the adoption of clcy council uruiuau~e ;:.,. 133 cr °ay onth ioai Ordinance No. 143 states that the approval is 'subject to the conditions' as sat forwarfl in planning Commission Resolution No. 81-37, establishing a framework and guideline for project implementation. (See Ordinance No. 143 and P.C. Resolution No. 81-37, attached as reference.) In those conditions the responsibility for insuring provision of proper park space was clearly the responsibility of the City (Resolution No. 81-37, Page 5, arks/open Soace, Items 1-7). The City met and is continuing to meet that responsibility. The responsibility for insuring the provision of school facilities fell to the appropriate school district (Resclution No, 81-37, Paae 4, Land L'sz, Item 4). The issue before the Council is a joint use agreement between the Etiwanda School District and the City for the use by each agency of the other's facility, specifically at the Windrows site. l38' Etiwanda School District and City Joint Use Agreement September 2, 1997 Page two In general, such agreements are common between Districts and Cities for shared use of public facilities. Through both formal master agreements and use permits, cities throughout the state work cooperatively' with districts to mutually maximize the use of public land to the benefit of it's client, the general public. In Rancho Cucamonga we have relied heavily on joint program use of school playfield areas for girls softball, little league baseball, tee ball, AYSO soccer, summer swim lessons, etc. It has proven to be a good way to do business. The City's General Plan adopted by the City Council on April 6, 1981, sets as apecilic objective oP the Recreation Element to: "Maximize opportunities for joint use of park and recreation facilities maintained by the Ciiy, school districts, and other public agencies." The 'typical' joint use of park and school site puts two 'independent' facilities adjacent to ono another for the ourposa oL enhancing the other. Examples: Hermosa Park/Deer canyon School; Coyote Canyon Park/Coyote Canyon School; and Bear Gulch Park/Bear Gulch School. In each of these examples, the school acts independently oP the park...a free . ,~. _..: _„ +r.n nark has an autonomou9 eLnlluiuy u,.it. .._.._..___ - integrity. In other wards, iP the park 'disappears', the school can still continue to provide it's full range of services, and conversely the park could function well without the school. The issue before the Council on the joint use of Windrows Park by Windrows School, however, is not the 'typical' joint use. In this situation, while the park is designed and constructed to function as a full service, stand alone neighborhood park without rely inq on the adjacent school facilities, the converse dces not appear to be the case. Specifically, Wi^drows School does not include a grass area upon which to conduc_ phys icai zducatior. classes or recess, which of course precludes softball, soccer or open field activities. Physical education and recess space on the school site is limited primarily to the hard court area on the eastern portion of the site abutting the park (site plan attached for reference). Further, there is no possibility to expand the undersized site. /39 Etiwanda School District and City Joint Use Agreement September 2, 1987 Page Three This then has created a quandry...how does the school, which by necessity desires an exclusive use area for control and security purposes, conduct lield activities in a neighborhood park that was designed and built for the benefit oL the community on a non-restrictive basis? In resolving the problem, a parochial approach will not yield a solution that will hest serve the children of the school. In staff's view, resolution of the existing problem is the first order of business. The steps taken to prevent it's repetition elsewhere will be presented later in this report. ONE SOLUTION: Windrows Neighbonc~od Park is approximately B.0 acres in size. It contains two softball diamonds, one soccer field, play area, picnic facilities, restroom and parking lot. A north/south sidewalk divides the park area in two sections, the westerly section being slightly over 3 acres in size and the easterly section, containing all the aforementioned amenities save one softball diamond and the soccer field, is slightly under 3 acres . The City could, under a joint use agreement, make available to the school the western portion of the park whereby the school would have controlled use from 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., weekends and school holidays excepted. In this way, with the north/south sidewalk as a boundary and proper playground -::p.c~ri.Si J:: vy sii„ui ~iii..iein, i.i~e yaia vuuiu Nt uviua a grass area Por open field activities, while at the same time provide all the general park amenities associated with a neighborhood park. In return for this arrangement the school would pay the full cost oP turf maintenance by City forces of the western portion of the park for the nine month school year. Additionally, the hard court area would be available for public use after school hours and on the weekends. Lastly, such an agreemert would contain all the hold harmless sections and insurance clauses (see sample agreement attached). 'Operationally' Prom a park and recreation standpoint, this type of reserved use of a oa rk, practically speaking, is not very different from reservations granted to A.Y.S.O. at Beryl Park during their soccer season, or Citrus League at Red Hill during their baseball season. / y4 Etiwanda School District and Soint IIse Agreement September 2, 1987 Pages Pour _ If the City Council wishes to grant this type of arrangement to the District, which in principal they have agreed to, we will forward the agreement to ,them for action and return to Council Por final execution. IP City Council wishes to pursue a different approach, staff will be Y.appy to Poliow your direction. Preventing a Repetition of the Existing-Situation The ideal philosophy of a symbiotic relationship was not achieved at the Windrows School and Park site. A similar repetition of this type of 'co-location' was about to occur in the Caryn project and the city council elected not to proceed with the park in this project, but chose instead to accept in lieu fees. That necessary decision was made to avoid a reoccurrence of what was being correctly forecast as an upcoming problem at the Windrows site. Councilwomen Hrown worked successfully with the Lyon Company to have the school sites at bath Vineyards North and South expanded to avoid 'grassless' school sites at these locations as were being proposed. It is hoped 1n the tuture that all parties to joint use developments will embrace the concept of 'mutual enhancement' another...it can only lead to further problem resolving. HH:bs ~y/ W H N Y Q Q a O O 2 U N N _? O C O Z ~. :ic .r t Fl i s.` - . m N 7 ~ O ~ O - ~ ,_ T V tll V 4 O A A m m r A, '. R .r "4.'. - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~ycA,tio,~ STAFF REPORT ~~' ~.~ O a pp U UL Date: October 7, 1987 iy;; 9 To: City Council and City Manager ~/ From: Karen McGuire-Emery, Associate Park Planner-~C ni'~~ Subject: Approval of the Conceptual Development Plana for Two Neighborhood Parks to be Located within the Victoria Development, as recommended by the Park and Recreation Commission and the Planning commission RECOMMffi7W\ • TION That the City Council review and approve the conceptual plane for two Neighborhood Parks, to be located in the Vineyards "North" Community, as recommended by the Park and Recreation Commission and the Planning Commission. City staff has received anfl reviewed the conceptual development plans, submitted by the William Lyon Co., for the next two Victoria Development Neighborhood Parks. Located in thn Victoria Vineyards "North" Community, the two Pork niLea are each approximately '7 acres In size and will be adjacent to two school facilities, each totaling 6.5 scree. (3ee Exhibits A&H.) Both park sites will include play area tot lots, picnicking facilities with barbecues, basketball hardcourt facilities, ballfields with adequate area provided for soccer overlays, restroom facilities, as well as on site parking. Concern was expressed by the Planning Commission that any lighting for the parking lots should be designed to prevent glare on the adjacent single family lots. It is staff's intent to take this into consideration when reviewing lighting fixture submittals for the project. KMC-E •pe Attachments: Exhibit "A" "Kenyon Way" Park Hita Exhibit "B" "Victoria Park Lane" Park Site ly3 // // iyy ~~ - S~: 0 = .. ~~ ~I 0 ~~~~ ~ ~~ 9 P ~. i ~~~// Gam; C ~1 i%'~ ~ ~~ y O~ u; z a~ ~~ Xj~' ~: O ~ ~: z ~ ~~ ,! Q ,'~^~ :: i W ^~ H` ~ I~..~ ~ c Q O r~ ~ (.~ r c ~~ z -1 ~, z u w< z H Ha ~ ~ ~~ ~r a F x W P s'"' U V • F ~1 5. 1! °u a~~t~'i Ii g[gi 4~ I ~e e~~'~ =~. ~`~ `-,~~ O 1"-~'1 V1 I Zm ~` ~G C J~-' O c~ Va ~ ' ~a ~r/~1 u r~ o ~a LJ :J O -~/ ~ ~'-I :~ /\ ~ ~~ O ,{ ^~ z~ ~r ~W ~ H ,,. LL ~/ QO r r z~ ~- z ~„~ c~;z a i~ ~~' ': Q1 _H m ti 111 /yS - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ STAFF REPORT ~~' ~~~.~ ~'i 6'~' z DATE: October 7, 1987 :vn ~ TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Karen McGuire-Emery, Associate Park Planner ~~ni-~ SVBJECT: Acceptance of the Victoria Groves Park Proj act in the Victoria Planned Community RECOlD~iDATION That the City Council accept as complete the Victoria Groves Park Project and authorise the Director of community Services to file a Notic® of Completion. The Victoria Groves Park Project has been completed to the satisfaction oP the Director of the Community Services Department. It is therefore recommended that the City Council accept the project from the William Lyon company as complete and direct the Director of Community Services to file a Notice of Completion for the work. KME/bcs /y6 nrmv nc n ~ unvn nirn n ~,rnwrn w STAFF REPORT ~~~u , ..~~ ~i ~~i 6 ~, s DATE: October 7, 1987 =1977 TO: City Council and City Manager //~~ FROM: Dave Leonard, Park Project Coordinator S~ REPORT: Approval of Professional Services Agreement with Porkies-Rosa Associates for development of plans and specifications for west Beryl Park Expansion. RECOMMENDATION• Approval oP contract with Purkiss-Rose Associates of Fullerton, California to develop working drawings for construction of Weet Beryl Park expansion. The base contract is $29,450.00 and n 10; contingency totals $32,395.00. BACKGROUND: Per council action on August 20, 1986, the conceptual design for the expansion oP the existing Beryl Park facility west toward Carnelian Street wee approved. The approximate tan (lo) acre addition fees attachadl wilt inrt udw twc t innreA soccer fields, picnic facilities, children pla area volleyball and hand court areas, exercise trail and stations, parking and reatroom facilities. On August 10, 19878, council authorized the Community Services Department to seek professional design services to develop construction drawings and specifications. Request for proposals were received from ten (30) firma on September 18, 1987. The proposals ranged in price from $29,450.00 to $66,111.00 with Purkiss-Rose Associates the low proposal. (Proposal summary attached). Purkiss-Rose has recently completed work with the City on a project of similar size and scope, Hermosa Park. Construction of Hermosa was completed with total satisfaction and based on Purkiss-Roos performance on that project and their low proposal for West Beryl expansion, we are recommending they be awarded the contract. DL/bcs /y~ CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMITRY OF PROP03AI3 PROJECT: bleat Beryl Park Expansions DATE: Sept. 18, 1987 Consultant Firm Proposal Options 1.) Purkiea-Rose Road Engineering $26,210.00 $3,240.00 Associates Fullerton, CA 2.) Heimberger-Hirsch Fullerton, CA 3.) Elliott/Maloney Riverside, CA 4.) Cardoza Dilello Harrington Costa Mesa, CA $30,450.00 $33,235.00 $38,000.00 5.) RHA, Inc. Riverside, CA 6.) Segura Associates Diamond Bar, CA 7.) Takata Associates S. Pasadena, CA 8.) Be£u-DOnen Associates Pasadena, CA 9.) Eichenberger Fennell Associates Costa Meea, CA 10.) R.J.M. Design Irvine, CA Shade Structure $39,000.00 $2,800.00 $39,300.00 $42,325.00 $47,500.00 $48,000.00 $60,000.00 ~yB ~ O .Q 1~~ ~'-pp 2 w J C U G V O C 'J :J .'~ V G O /~/V~ ~O `/ 4 I-JI 1,~~c / V _~ q f~ r~ .~ o /y`~ 1?3 b15 NII1)Ntl<D ,,.m., „ STAFF REPORT c~~^^~o"~ ~' ~ ~ .r DATE: October 7, 1987 ~~ [-1 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council ryr~ ~ FROM: Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner BY: Miki Bratt, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FOR COlMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES KITH MICHAEL BRANDMAN ASSOCIATES IN THE AMOUNT OF 524,410.00 FOR THE 1987-1988 CDBG PROGRAM YEAR I. RECOMI4ENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached ro ess ono Services Agreement: Community Development Block Grant Consultant' in the amount of (24,410.00 for the 1987-1988 CDBG program year, ending July 31, 1988. II. BACKGROUND: As required by Community Development Block Grant reg~u a ions of the Departpient of Housing and Urban Developcent, a request for proposal for Block Grant consultant was initiated. The consultant Ts requested to prepare the annual Housing A5515tance Pi an, the 1987-1988 Block Grant application and the annual Grantee Performance Report, as well as to provide ongoing program management. Criteria for selection included experience administering federal Block Grant regulations, familiarity with the City Block Grant programs, a commitment to a high level of service to the City and cost. Based on the above criteria, the firm of Michael Brandman Associates was chosen. Laura Hudson, whd has been the person providing administrative services for the City Block Grant programs since 1983, Joined the Brandman firm 1n July of 1987, and will continue to be the person providing administrative services to the City. The term of the contract is for one year, but in accord with Block Grant regulations the contract contains a renewal clause and may be renewed twice to extend through the 1989-1990 Block Grant program year. This year the City Council has allocated f81,700.00 for program administration including a separate contract for Fair Housing Services. The amount of this contract, f24,410.00, is well within the budget for administrative services. Respectfully submitted, Ott ut Oepu City Planner OK:MB: to ~~ PROFESSIONAL SERY[CES AOREFiffNT: CDB6 CONSULTANT This Agree~ent is awde and entered into this day of , 1987, between the City of RanMO CucaaxMga, a ~i 1in cipal o'C rporafi-on (hereinafter referred to as "CITY') and Nlchael Brandean Associates, (hereinafter referred to as 'CONSULTANT"). A. Recitals. (1) CITY has heretofore issued its Request Por Proposal pertaining to the perfonance of professional services with respect to the adadnlstration of the 1987/88 grant and preparation of the Noosing Assistance Plan, 0086 appltutlon for 1988/89 and the Emrironnental Rev1aM Record for each pro~ecL, a full, true and correct copy of xA1ch is attached hereto as Exhibit 'A" and by this reference swde a part hereof. (ti) CONSULTANT has now subadtted its proposal for the perfonance of such services, a full, true and correct copy of which proposal 1s attached hereto as Exhibit `B' and by this reference aNde a part hereof. (111) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to pertors professional services necessary to render advice and ass/stance to CITY, CITY's Planning Commission, C1ty Council and stiff 1n the preparation of the PrWect. (1v) CONSULTANT represents that it 1s a11t1ed to perforw such services and 1s wi111ng to person such professional services as hereinafter defined. NON, THEREFORE, iL is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT as iuiiuwa: B. A rg eesKnt 1. CONSULTANT agrees as follows: (a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and caagtete the project 1n accordance with Exhibits "A' and '8' hereto and all in accordance with Federal, State and CITY statutes, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY. (b) CONSULTANT shell, at CONSULTANT'S sole cost and expense, secure and h1re such other persons as aNy, 1n the opinion of CONSULTANT, be necessary to coayly with the tents of this Agreaent. In the event any such other persons are retained by CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT hereby warrants that such persons shalt be fatty quatisled to perfont services required hereunder. CONSULTANT further agrees that no subcontractor shall be retained by CONSULTANT except upon the prior written approval of CITY. /S/ Professional Services Agreement CD86 Consultant Page 2 CItt agrees as follows: (a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximum sum of f24,410 for the performance of the services required hereunder. Th1s sw shall cover the cost of all staff time and ail other direct and indirect costs or fees, including the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors Lo CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made in accordance with the schedule set forth below. (b) Payments t0 CONSULTANT shall 6e made by CITY in accordance with the lnvotces submitted by CONSULTANT on a monthly basis, and such lnvotces are received by CITY. Atl charges shall be 1n accordance with CONSULTANT'S proposal elthv with respect to hourly rates or lump sw amounts for individual tasks. (c) Additional services: Payments for additional services requested, 1n writing, by CITY, and not included in CONSULTANT'S proposal as set forth 1n Exhibit 'B' hereof, shall be paid on a reimbursement basis in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in said ExhlDtt 'B'. Charges for additional services shall De invoiced an a monthly basis and shall De paid by CITY within a reasonable Nme after said invoices are received by CITY. CITY agrees to Drovlde to CONSULTANT: la) Infonmetion and assistance as set fortA in Exhibit "A" hereto. Ib) Such lnfonmatton as is generally available from CITY f11es applicable to the protect. (c) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining lnforsatton from other governmental agencies and/or private parties. However, it shalt be CONSULTANT'S responsib111ty to make all initial contact with respect to the gathering of such lnforgtlon. 4. Terslnatton: This Agreement may be terslnated by CITY upon the giving of a wr n o ce of Tenainatton" to CONSULTANT at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date of terslnatlon specified 1n said Notice. in the event this Agreement is sa tenalnated, CONSULTANT shall De compensated at CONSULTANT'S applicable hourly rates as set forth in ExhlDit "B", on a pro- rate basis with respect to the percentage of the project completed as of the date of tersination. In no event, however, shell CONSULTANT receive more than the maximum specified 1n paragraph 2 (a) above. CONSULTANT shall provide to CITY any and all documents, data, studies, drawings, maps, photographs and reports, whether in draft or float fors, prepared by CONSULTANT as of the date of tersinatlon. CONSULTANT may not terminate this Agreemen' except for cause. / S2_ Professional Services Agreement CDB6 Consultant Page 3 5. Notices and Designated Representatives: My and all notices, demands, Invoices and writ en common ca ons a en a parties hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph 5. fie below named individuals, furthersgre, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the performance by the parties under this Agreement: M1k1 Brats, Assistant Planner Laura Hudson, Senior Protect Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Michael Brandman Associates P. 0. Box 807 411 Nest 5th Street, Suite 1010 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Los Mgeles, CA 90013 My such notices, demands, invoices and written caamunicattons, by mall, shall be doomed to have been received by the addressee folly-eight (48) hours after deposit thereof Tn the United States moll, postage prepaid and properly addresstd as set forth above. 6. Insurance. CONSULTANT shall neither commence work under this Agreement until as o fined all insurance required hereunder to a campagy or companies accepUDle to CITY nor shad CONSULTANT allow any suDcomtrecLor to cawence work on a subcontract until all insurance rcguired of the suDcontroctor has been obtained. CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the terms of this Agreement the following policies of insurance: (a) Workers' Compensation Insurance. Before beginning work. CONGII TaNT than u~~fn FITa-~ii/ITSS ~............ .-e that 1t has taken out full workers' coapensation insurance for all persons who 1t may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work specified herein, Tn accordance with the laws of the State of California. fn accordance with the provisions of California Labor Gode Section 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of calgensatlon to his employees. CONSULTANT prior to commencing work, shall s/gn and file with CITY a certification as follows: 'I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which reguire every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before cowgencinq the performance of the work of this Agreement." (b) Public LlabiliL and ProDeMy Oamege. Throughout the terw of this Agreement; af'Z11's so a cos an expense, CONSULTANT shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for Lhe mutual benefit of CITY and CONSULTANT, comprehensive, broe6 fors, general public liability and automobile insurance against claims and 11a~ilities for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from CONSULTANT activities, providing protection of at least Five Hundred Thousand Dollars (5500,000.00) for bodily injury or death 4o any one person or for any one a<Ctdent or occurrence and at least Five Hundred Thousand Dollars (=500,000.00) for property damage. /s3 professional Services Agreement COB6 Consultant Page 4 (c) General Insurance Reouirewents. All insurance required by express provision or thfs greewn s a e carried only to responsible insurance companies licensed to do business 1n the State of California and policies required under paragraphs 6 (a) and (b) shall name as addltlonal insureds CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents. All policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the effect that: (1) the insurer valves the right of subrogation against CITY and CITY's elected offlclals, officers, employees, and agents; (2) Me policies are prlwry and noncantrtbuting with any insurance tlwt may be carried by CITY; and (3) thSy cannot be cancelled or wterially changed except after thirty (30) days' notice by the insurer to CITY by cerLlfled w11. CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY with copies of all such policies praaptly upon receipt of thew, or certificate evidencing Lhe Insurance. CONSIA.TAMT RY effect for its own account insurance not required under this A9reawent. 7. Indwnlficatlan. CONSULTANT shall defend, indewnify and save haAless CITY, esftTfe'a awn appointed offlclals, officers, agents and employees, frow all 11abi11Ly fraw loss, dawga or 1r~ury to persons or property, including the paywent by CONSULTANT of any and all legal costs and attorneys' fees, 1n any wooer arising out of or 1nCldental t0 the perforwnce by CONSULTANT of this Agreewent, tncluding, but not limited Lo, ell consequential dawges, to the wxiwuw extent penHtted by Law. 8. Assiyww.mt. No assignment of this Agreewnt or of aqy part or obligation of pe o' rTiwence hereunder shall be wde, either in whole or in ~Lrt, :~ »Qi:w:T.~..T w. «'iwit «w yi iLi wi it~ci~ CGriSih~i ul LIII. 9. Independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that CONSULTANT and 1 s ewp oyars, o cers and agents are independent contractors under this Agreeaw!nt and shall not be construed for any purpose to be employees of CITY. 10. 6overnin Law. This AgreewnL shall be governed by and construed 1n actor nee w e laws of the State of California. il. Attorney's Fees. In the event any legal proceeding 1s instituted to en orce any ena or proWston of the Agreewnt, the prevailing party 1n said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' tees and costs fraw the opposing party in an awount deterwlned by the Court to be reasonabie. 12. Access to Records and Retention of Records: The CITY, the Federal grantor agency, a awp ro er ra o e n ed SLaies, or any of their duly authorized representatives, shall have access to any books, documents, papers, and records of the contractor which are directly pertinent to this contract for the purpose of wktng audit, exawinatlon, excerpts, and transcriptions. Federal guidelines require retention of records for a minimum of three years and 1n case Instances for flue years. /may Professional Services Agreement CDB6 Consultant Page 5 13. Conflict itself and its pro eTsT members, or any of its si leaning of the Fair Po11t~ any such interest during warrants for itself, its they do not have any finan rendering the professlona CITY. Upon request of tl completed by CONSULTANT, 1 Interest Clause: That CONSULTANT warrants for T.aff"{~af newt ear CONSULTANT nor any of its staff ontractore have any economic interest within the i Practices Act to the CITT and shall not acquire ve ter+ of this Agreement. CONSULTANT further desslonal employees, and Its subcontractors that it interest which would disqualify themselves from services were they designated employees of the CITY, a Statement of Economic Interest shall be professional employees, and its subcontractors. 14. Nondlscrlminatlon Clause: CONSULTANT represents and agrees that 1t does no a no scr mtnate against any subcontractor, consultant, employee or applicant for employmant because of race, religion, color, sex or national origin. Such nondlscrlminatlan shall include but not be limited to the fo110w1ng: employment, upgrading, dmaotton, or transfers or recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or terminattan• rates of y other forms of compensation; and selection for training including apprenticeship. 15. Section 3 Clause: (a) fie work to De perfor~ad under this contract is on a protect assisted under a program prodding direct Federal financial assistance fray the Department of Nousing and Urban Development and 1s subject to the reWlrmaents Of Section 3 of the Nnuclna anA Ilrhan fIw.lMrn~ trt ~f lace amended, 12 U.S.C. 1701 u. Section 3 requires that, to the greatest extent feasible, opportunities for tralning and employment De given lower lncaae persons residing within the unit of local government or the metropolitan area (or nonmetropolitan county) 1n whits the pro,)eCt is located, and contracts for work in connection with the project De awarded to business concerns which are located 1n or owned 1n substantial part by persons residing in the same metropolitan area (or nonmeLropolltan county) as the prWect. (b) The parties to this contract will comply with the provisions of said Seetlon 3 and the regulations issued pursuant thereto by the Secregry of Ilousing and Urban Development seL forth 1n 24 CFR Part 135, and all applicable rules and orders of the De artment issued thereunder prior to Lhe execution of this contract. The parties to this contract certify and agree that they are under no contractual or other disability which would prevent them from complying with these requirements. (c) The CONSULTANT will send to ath labor orgganization ar representative of workers with which he has a colleetlve bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, 1f any, a notice advising the said tabor organization or workers' representative of Ais co~ltments under this Section 3 clause and shall post copies of the notice 1n conspicuous places ava/1aDle to employees and applicants for employment or tralning. /S~" Professional Services Agreeeent CDB6 Cwsul tent Page 6 (d) The CONSULTANT will include this Section 3 clause in every subcontract for work in cwnecttw with the project and x111, at the direction of the applicant for or recipient of Federal financial assistance, take appropriate action pursuant to the subcontract upw a finding that the subcontractor is to violation of regulations issued by the $ecrctary of Housing and Urban Development, 24 CFR Part 135. The CONSULTANT will not subcontract with any subcontractor rDere it has notice or knowledge that the latter has been found 1n violatlw of regulations under 24 CFR Part 135 and will not let any subcontract, unless the subcontractor has first provided it with a prclimiwry statement of ability to comply with the rcqulrements of these rcgutatiws. (e) Compliance with the prorfslws of Secttw 3, the regulations set forth in 24 CFR Part 135, and all applicable rules and orders of the Department issued thereunder prior t0 Lhe eaecuHon of tha contract, shall be a cwdttion of the Federal financial assistance provided to the project, birMt~ upon the CITY or recipient for such assisGnee, its successors, and assigns. Fatlurc to fulfill these requirements shall suWect the CITY or recipient, CONSULTANT, and subcwtractors, its successors, and assigns to those sancLtons specified by Me grant or two agreeawmL or contract through which Federal assistance is provided, and to suth sancttws as are specified by 24 CfR Part 135. (f) CONSULTANT and any subcontractors subject to the rcqulrements of Secttw 3 are required to prepare a written affir~atlve action of an in accordance with the orovlslons of Sections 135.65 and 135.70. and 24 CFR Part 135. 16. Mendment Provision: This agreement may be amended ar modified only by wr en agreemen s fined Dy all parties; and failure on the part of either party to enforce any provision of this Agreement shalt not De construed as a waiver of the right to compel enfaroement o1 such provision or provisions. 17. Effective Dates of Agreement: fits Agrcfaent shall De in effect frw rau u y 1, 1988, and say be amended to continue for a aea mum o ree years through July 31, 1990. 18. Entire Agreement. Th1s Agreement supersedes any and all other agreemenLS, a er ore or Tn wriLing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein. Each party to this Agrcemant acknowledges Lhat no representation by any party which is not embodied hereto nor any other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be va11d and binding. My modification of Lhis Agreement shall be effective only if it 1s 1n writing signed by all parLles. /S~ Professional Services Agreeiaent CDB6 Consultant Page 7 IM MITNESS YFH:ItEDF, the parties Hereto a executed this Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above: ~ onsu n i~~ r AttEST: e ae /S? STAFF ftEPOftT V ~~c~M~°~ o J _ ~ 3 197; Date: October 7, 1987 To: Mayor and City Council From: Lauren Wasserman, City Manager By: Marti Higgins, Disaster Preparedness Coordinator~i '/ Subject: Signature Resolution for Emergency Management Assistance Funding It is recommended that Council approve Signature Resolution M 87-xxx da required by State OLfica of 8mergency Services, for submitting Rancho Cucamonga~e application for Emergency Management Assistance (B.M.A.) Funding. The 9tata Office of Emergency Services Administers a financial assistance program as offered by the Federal Emergency Manegemeni Association (F.E.M.A.) Every jurisdiction in California is eligible for this funding providing they fulfill the Status requirements. The funding allows up to 50$ reimbursement of certain expenses a jurisdiction has incurred for its Emergency Management Program. Expenses include staff, certain administrative expenses and equipment. The requirements for the funding include a Signature Resolution; a statement of staffing patterns; Emergency Budget; the Emergency Plan; a yearly workplan; a H.I.C.A.M.Y. D.P. ( Hazard Identification, Capability Assessment, and Multi-Year Development Plan Por Local Governments) and a Exercise Plan. After a jurisdiction la accepted, quarterly staff time cleims are submitted and paid. On October 1st of the following years a budget and yearly workplan are submitted Por approval. 3.`: ~$~ Signature Resolution for Emergency Mnnagament Assistance Funding October 7, 1987 Pnqe 2 Presently we are working on the initial application by eubaitting the above nosed items. Tha lirst document needed is the Signature Resolution, nosing those persona authorized to sign the yearly application for funflinq for Rancho Cucamonga. 44[: bs ~s9 53~ RESOLDTION ND. H7-~r BE IT RESOLVED BY CITY COUNCIL OF RANCAO CUCAMONGA, that the following named individuals are hereby authorized to execute for and in behalf of RANCHO COCAM:DNGA, a public entity established under the laws of the State of California, applications and documents for the purpose oY obtaining financial assistance under the Federal Civil Defense Act of 1930, As Amended, (Public Law 920, 81st Congress, 30 USC App. 2251-2297). ~ Lauren Wasserman, City Manager (Director Emg. Se r.) gna ure a name an e Robert Rizzo, Assistant City Manager (Asst. Dir. Emg. , (Alternate signature) (Typed name and title) Services) (Alternate signature) ~ (Typed nnme and PASSED AND APPROVED TNIS Ztiji DAY OF October, 1987. (Name And title) ~ (Name and title) (Name and title) ~ (Nnme and title) (Name and title) ~ (Name and title) I, , duly appointed and (Name) (Title) of (Public Entity) do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a Resolution passed and approved by the (Governing Hody) of 7th day of October, 1987. DATE: on (signature) (Official Pceition) i6o nxrna~ nn n ~ vnan n STAFF REPORT V DATE: October 7, 1987 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Pianner SUBJECT: CONTRACT RENEWAL FOR CODE ENFORCEMENT REPRESENTATIVE .:p` 4 f ~l I J VV ~sn I. RECOMMENDATION: It is recasaended that the City Council approve the con roc renewal for the Community Code Representative. II. BACKGROUND: Joe Torrez has been with the City of Rancho Cucamonga for over years in the position of Community Code Representative without a contract renewal. The purpose of this contract renewl 1s to provide for a cost of living ad,~ustment Por the last two years. Joe has played an Integral part in building up our code enforcement activities and has been primarily involved in the area of commercial and industrial code enforcement. Respec full~~ ed i B er City anner BB:ko cc: City Manager ~~~ This Agreement is made and entered into this 1st day of October, 1987, between the CITY of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporatfon (hereinafter known as "CITY") and Mr. Joe Torrez (hereinafter known as ("CONSULTANT"). A. Recitals. (t1 CITY has heretofore issued its intent to contract for professional services with respect to code enforcement activities (hereafter referred to as "services"). (it) CONSULTANT has heretofore issued an intent to contract with CITY for the performance of such services. (iii) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform services necessary to accomplish the duties of code enforcement activities. (iv) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perfona such services and is willing to perform such services as hereinafter defined. NON, THEREFORE, it 1s agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT as follows: B. Agreement. 1. Definition: The following definition shall apply to the following Lena, except ewTre tie context of this Agreement otherwise requires: (a) Services. fie completion of those Code Enforcement requirements describeTin E'xTiibit "A" hereto. 2. CONSULTANT agrees as follows: (a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith perform the services in accordance with Exhibit "A" hereto and all in accordance with Federal, State, and CITY statutes, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY. (b) CONSULTANT shall be the sole person providing services 1n accordance with this Agreement and shall not secure and hire any other persons to conply with the teens of this Agreement. 3. CITY agrees as follows: (a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximum sum of 115.40 per hour for the performance of the services required hereunder. fits sum shall cover the cost of alt staff time and all other direct and indirect costs or fees, Including the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors to COK.,ULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY shall be made in accordance with the schedule set forth below. ~y~' Joe Torrez Agreement Page 2 (b) Paycents to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY in accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and such invoices shall be paid within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. A11 charges shall be in accordance with CONSULTANT'S proposal either with respect to hourly rates or lump sum amounts for individual tasks. In no event, however, will said invoices exceed 95Y of individual task totals described in Exhibit "A". (c) Additional services: Payments for additional services requested, in writing, by CITY, shall be paid on a reimbursement basis in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in paragraph 3(a ), above. Charges for additional services shall be Invoiced on a monthly basis and shad be paid 6y CITY within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. CONSULTANT shalt not be paid for any services performed in excess of forth (40) hours each work week unless such additional hours are requested by CITY for additional services. 4. CITY agrees to provide to CONSULTANT: (a) Infonmatlon and assistance as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereto. (b) Such information as is generally available from CITY files applicable to the service requirements. (c) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining info-a•icr, fray -`hcr ga• -- "-tai agcccics and/or private parties. However, 1t shall be CONSULTANT'S responsibility to make all initial contacts with respect to the gathering of such information. 5. Ownership of Documents: All documents, data, surveys, drawings, maps, photograp s an repor s prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of CITY and, upon payment for services perfornied by CONSULTANT, such documents and other identified materials shall be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT. 6. Termination: This Agreement may be terminated by CITY upon the giving of a wr en once of Termination" to CONSULTANT at least fifteen (15) days prior to date of termination specified in said Notice. In the event this Agreement is so terminated, CONSULTANT shall be compensated at CONSULTANT'S applicable hourly rates as set forth in paragraph 3(a) above, or a pro-rata basis with respect to the percentage of the protect completed as of the date of termination. In no event, however, shall CONSULTANT receive more than the maximum specified in paragraph 3(a), above. CONSULTANT shall provide to CITY any and all documents, data, surveys, drawings, maps, photographs and reports, whether in draft or final form, prepared by CONSULTANT as of the date of termination. CONSULTANT may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. X63 doe Torrez Agreement Page 3 7. Notices and Desi noted Re resentattves: My and all notices, demands, invo ce~in~' en common catTs bin the parties hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph 7. The below named individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the performance by the parties under this Agreement: City Manager Director of Coamunity Development City Pianner Deputy City Planner Code Enforcement Supervisor My such notices, demands, invoices and written communications, by mail, shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty-eight (48) hours after deposit thereof Tn the United States mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as set forth above. 8. Insurance: CONSULTANT shall not commence work under this Agreement udtil-fi-~s obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to CITY. CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all Limes during the term of this Agreement the following policies of insurance: (aI Markers' C ensation Insurance: Before Deglnning work, CONSULTANT shall furn~~i;o a cer caTflnsurance as proof that it has taken out full workers' compensation insurance for said CONSULTANT in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of compensation to this empioyee. CONSULTANT prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with CITY a certification as follows: "I am aware of the provl5tons of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the Derformance of the work of this Agreement." (b) Before beginning work, CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance as proof that it has secured and will maintain through to term of th15 Agreement automobile liability and property damage insurance in an amount not less than 5100,000 (one hundred thousand dollars) for CONSULTANT and CONSULTANT'S business vehicle. 9. Indemnification: CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and save harmless CIT4~ts eTec'~d and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees, from all liability from loss, damage or injury to persons or property, including the payment by CONSULTANT of any and all legal costs and attorneys' fees, in any manner arising out of or incidental to the performance by CONSULTANT of this Agreement, including, but mat limited to, ail consequential damages, to the maximum extent permitted by law. icy Jce Torrez Agreement page 4 10. Assignwent: No assignment of this Agreement or of any part or obligation o pei ~frsacee hereunder shall be side, either in whole or in paM, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY. 11. Independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that CONSULTANT is an independent con roc or un r this Agreement and shall not be construed far any purpose to be an employee of CITY. 12. ~6ove_rn~ing Law: This Agreeaent shall be governed by and construed in accordancee 1-aws of the State of California. 13. Attorney's Fees: In the event aqy legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any e~ t~ or provision of the Agreesent, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the opposing party 1n an amount deterwined by the Court to be reasonable. 14. Mnual Evaluation: COSNSULTANT shall be evaluated annually in writing as to a pe ormance and fu1f111nent of contractual duties. 15. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, a er ora or n writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which 1s naL embodied hercln nor any other agreement, statement, or promise not contained to this Agreement shall be valid and Dlndtng. Any modification of this Agreement shalt be effective only if it is in writing signed by all parties. _. ,1, I,~II,LJJ IIIILI, LVI, NIi X11,1 Y~Gi GLV ~YY< G/.GbYtGY N.Ii Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above: CONSULTANT CITY enn s ou , yor ATTEST: every u e e , ark /6s Jce Torrez Agreement Page 5 EXHIBIT 'A' CDMMUNITY COUE CONSULTANT DEFINITION To perform technical office and field work in the enforcement of various CITY codes and ordinances, and to assist in processing and presenting related notices, reports and public hearing documents related to code enforcement. SUDERVISION RECEIVED AND EXERCISED General contract supervision is provided by Code Enforcement Supervisor. No supervision is exercised over other personnel. REQUIREMENTS Duties are required as follows: - conduct field checks to uncover possible violations of a variety of CITY codes and ordinances, including zoning and related regulations. - investigate possible violations, contact respansiDie persons in person and 1n writing; perform follow-up investigations to see that remedial action has been taken. - prepare and present code violation cases before appropriate advisory and appeals boards. ^^-pilc 1iGm«,aica onC y';Eydre Stuii leyu,La UII a VOPiely or cuae enforcement matters. - respond to citizen complaints regarding code violations, investigate and resolve problems, provide information to public by phone and in person regarding code regulations. - assist planning staff 1n researching and preparing special reports and praiects related to code enforcement. - learn and explain appropriate CITY codes and ordinances. - understand legal descriptions and boundary maps of real property, - analyze and compile technical information to code investlgattons and violations. - apply investigative techniques useful in ensuring compliance with appropriate codes and ordinances. - establish and maintain effective working relationships and communications with the public, other CITY personnel and outside agencies. - communicate clearly and concisely, orally and in writing, - possess a valid California driver's/license. ~~~ Jce Torrez Agrel~ent Page 6 CODE ENFORCEMENT CONTRACT I aA aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Cade which requires every eaployer to be Insured against liability for workers' coagensation or to undetake self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will coaply with such provisions before caanencing the perforoence of the work of this Agree~ent. ~.. +,. ~V 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Oa te: October 7, 1987 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer ~''`U'"'~'k: e~ ~ '> mi~~1= ~A F ~ 2 _ ~ By: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer Subject: Set Public Hearing for October 21, 1987 for the Base Line Road Environmental Assessment Review, (Hellman Avenue to Archibald Avenue) RECOMIEIDATION: It fs recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution for scheduling of a Public Hearing on the City Council's Agenda of Wednesday, October 21, 1987 for .the Base Line Road Widening Environmental Assessment Review, (Hellman Avenue to Archibald Avenuel. The projects limits are from the Southern Pacific Railroad Tracks East of Hellman Avenue to Archibald Avenue. Such action is pursuant of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQAI. This report presents the Engineering Staff's request to set a Public rieariny ua ie iur Lice oaae Liue nuau wiueniny uwirunmen Lai Aesee eim:nL Review, (Heilman Avenue to Archibald Avenuel. The project limits are from the Southern Pacific Railroad Tracks, East of Hellman Avenue to Archibald Avenue. Said Environmental Assessment Review is in conformance with CEQA requirements and shall render an environmental evaluation of the City's proposed Base Line Widening Project. Resp ly submitted, 1 :LEH: Attachment; ~/o RESOLUTION N0. a / ~ `-'~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF NEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 21, 1987 FOR THE BASE LINE ROAD NIOENING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEN (HELLMAN AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE) NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has directed the City's Engineering Staff and Linville Civil Engineers/Land Surveyors, Inc. to proceed with formal designs for the proposed street widentngs; and NHEREAS, said design for the street widening requires an Environmental Assessment; and NHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. NOM, THEREFORE, BE [T RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves a sets a Pubiic Hearing of Nedcesdgy, October 21, 1987 at 7:30 p.m. to 6e held at Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California for the Base Line Road Nidening Environmental Assessment Review (Hellman Avenue to Archl6ald Avenue); and Section 2: The City Clerk is directed to submit the attached City of Rancho Cucamonga~vironmental Assessment Notice for advertisement prior to said Pid~l it Heari nn Aa fa nurgnanr m rpe nlts,.r.,t~ c.ytr:n^CRtal Qua"t, (CEQA) requirements. .w. ~_~ /6 ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENVIROIJniENTAL ASSESSMENT NOTICE Complete environmental assessments have been prepared for the following project(s). The City Council will be considering these assessments, staff's recommendation, and public input, at their meeting of October 21, 1987 prior to making a final environmental determination. Following is a brief description and location of the project(s) and staff's recommendation on the project(s) to 6e considered. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED BASE LINE ROAD WIDENING PROJECT - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- The project location is Base Line Road from the Southern Pacific Railroad Tracks East of Hellman Avenue to Archibald Avenue. The proposed improvements consist of widening the street to its ultimate width which includes the construction of Portland Cement Concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drive approaches, asphalt concrete pavement and the installation oP street lights. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the Environmental Assessment and issuance of a Negative Declaration for the proposed Base Line Road Widening Project. A copy of the Environmental Assessment can be reviewed at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division office located aL 9320 Base Line Road, Suite "B", Rancho Cucamonga, California. Written comments should be addressed to the Engineering Division, City of Rancho Cucamonga, P.O. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730, or phoned at (714) 989-1862. In addition, concerns can be addressed to the City Council publicly at the meeting time previously mentioned, The meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. and shall take place at Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. PUBLISH: October 7, 1987 ~~Q - CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: October 7, 1987 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell R. Maguire, City Engineer ~ ~~~~~ ~~~„_ s ~!~ f' 6 Z 19JC By: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer Subject: Set Public Nearing for October 21, 1987 for the Arrow Route Phase I Environmental Assessment Review, (Archibald Avenue to Turner (Hermosa) Avenue) RECOMMENDATION: It is recomaended that City Council approve the attached Resolution far schediling of a Public Hearing on the City Council's Agenda of Wednesday, October 21, 1987 for the Arrow Route Phase I Environmental Assessment Review, (Archibald Avenue to Turner (Hermosa) Avenue). Such action is pursuant of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEpA). BACK61t0UMD/ANALYSIS• This report represents the Engineering Staff's request to set a Public Hearing date for the Arrow Route Phase I Enviromaental Assessment Review, (Archibald Avenue to Turner (Hermosa) Avenue). The project limits are the North side of Arrow Route from Archibald Avenue bo Turner Avenue. Said Environmental Assessment is in conformance with CEQA requirements a1M shall render an environmental evaluation of the City's proposed Arrow Route Phase I Project. Res ly ubmitted, R Attachments 7~ RESOLUTION N0. 0 ~ ' S.3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 21, 1987 FOR THE ARROW RWTE PNASE I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEN (ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO TURNER (HERMOSA) AVENUE NHEREAS, the Cibr Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has directed the City's Engineering Staff and Oon Greek and Associates to proceed with formal designs for the proposed street improvement; and NHEREAS, said design for the street improvement requires an Environmental Assessment Review; and WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. NON, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1: 'The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves amts a Public Hearing on Nednesday, October 21, 1987 at 7:30 p.m. to De held at Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California for the Arrow Route Phase I Environmental Assessment Review (Archibald Avenue to Turner (Hermosa) Avenuel; and Section 2: The City Clerk is directed of Rancho Cucamo~~vironmental Assessment Notice said Public Hearing pursuant to the California f rcnel romi(romonte. to submit the attached City for advertisement prior to Environmental Quality Act / e7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NOTICE Complete environmental assessments have been prepared for the following project(s). The City Council will be considering these assessments, staff's recommendation, and public input, at their meeting of October 21, 1987 prior to making a final environmental determination. Following is a brief description and location of the project(s) and staff's recommendation on the projectls) tv be considered. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED ARRON ROUTE PHASE I PROJECT - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - The project location is Arrow Route, North side between Archibald Avenue and Turner Avenue. The proposed improvements consist of widening the North side of the street to its ultimate width which includes the construction of Portland Cement Concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks and drive approaches, asphalt concrete pavement and the installation of street lights. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:. It is recommended that City Council approve the Envirommental Assessment and issuance of a Negative Deciaration for the proposed Arrow Route Phase I Project. A copy of the Environmental Assessment can be reviewed at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division office located at 9320 Base Line Road, Suite "B", Rancho Cucamonga, California. written comments should be addressed to the Engineering Division, City of Rancho Cucamonga, P.O. Box ou7, Rancnv Cucamonga, i.aiiiornia yi73u, yr pnonea ac i~i41 yav-itsa[. 1n addition, concerns can be addressed to the City Council publicly at the meeting time previously mentioned. The meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m, and shall take place at Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. PUBLISH: October 7. 1987 /73 --- CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 7, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr, Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Parcel Map 10884 located on the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 as Annexation No. 5 and setting the date of public hearing for November 4, 1987 RE00!/EIIOATIQ It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 5 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above protect to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. Analysis/Background Attached for City Council approval are resolutions declaring the City's intent to annex Parcel Map 10884 to Street Lighting Maintenance District -- ing t`e puYi,. iry dcta f c.a-ta~ ~1987.~ ~~Also~~attached ufor~Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subJect annexation. Respec fitted, . _~ RHM:JAA:sd Attachnents /75~ RESOLUTION N0. $ ~ ~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY LOUT CIL OF THE CITY ff RANCHO CU CAMDN G4, CALIFORNIA, Of PRELIMINARY APPROVAL aF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 5 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 WHEREAS, on October 7, 1987, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and NHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, safd City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said reDOrt, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itelnt zed costs and expenses o~saf~ork and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily ann,-n veA anA rr. nfitmeA SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descr~ib~in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and co of i rme d. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sai ss es sment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received 6y said subdivision, respectively, fran said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and co of firmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for- Cur pos es of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the pr npnq Nd di <Lri Ct. ~7s CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 Annexation No. 5 for Parcel Map 10884 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Oivi sion 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all developments enumerated in Exhibit "A" into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots or parcels within said developments as well as on the lots or parcels directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light .^.p^0 ~^^t. ~~ 1JC 11 uT~p~Jrcuiciit nwiui. c~i wipe is considered of general benef it~to all areas in the District and cost shall De divided on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved 6y the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same ezt ent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, rano val or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the sub,j ect area. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs Actual assessments I will be based on No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement tnd use summaries. construction. All improvenents will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Approval of City The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 including Annexation No. 5 is shown below: nex a District and 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lamps Annex New lamp all testimony and Lamp Size* YTD No. 5 Total adings. 5800E 35 --- 35 port with the City 9500E 2 2 +Ntgh Pressure Sodium Vapor public hearing and assessments. Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps Rate Mo's Maint. Cost 5800E 35 X $ 8.93 X 12 = 53,750.60 9500E 2 X $10.16 % 12 = 243.84 Total Annual Mai nt. Cost $3,994,44 YTD Assessment Unit = 212.58; Assess. Unit this Annex. 2,6 Total = 215.18 Total Annual Maintenance Cost 53 994.44 = $18.54/year/unit No. o Un is in i5trict -i2I-S47C Assessment shall apply to each lot as explained in Section 6 SECTION 5. Assessment Diagr am Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6", Annexation No. 5. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within Lhe text of thii re00r t. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and Chat assessment shall he equal for ea rh emit. Where units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 snits per net acre. Z EXHIBIT "A" Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 5 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 6: PROJECT ACREAGE 9500E 5800E Parcel Map 10884 parcel 1 ,9 ___ ___ parcel 2 1.7 2.6 - - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. G ANNEXATION NO. S ~ -- }--- - ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ Q ~ 1 . ~M..nd ~ ~ ._ e aN, I ~ ~. ^~ , ~ -ARCEL i PAKGCL I p O ~ ~~ o '~"fy f 1 v+)~c) ~ 0 . 2 ~ ~ao~c.) , (i u~ - NOT A p ~ ~ ~ . y , N c PART i ~ _ ~M ~ -~ ~A n'LOa' , . _ . ~ j,,_ 19o.d/1' 'p -t' ~ --- _. __... __. __ hjA50 LING ROAD . .~~``' " M CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIlIONOA ., : ~ ~ . :~ : COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO ,rC~ ~;~j' = STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~T ~ L~ im ORA1N 1J0 RESOLUTION N0. g 7 ~ ~~ A RESOLUTI QN OF THE CITY COLN CIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUGAMDN G4, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTIQN TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE OISTRI CT N0. 6, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 5 TO STREET LIGHT ING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6; PURSl1gNT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME RND PLACE FOR NEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTIQi 1. Des cri Lion of Work: That the public interest and convenience require andTt, is t e inten on of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located wit in roadway n g t-o -way en user ated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City f.l rrk A„*; tied '!^. ^ne ration ;;,., S t~ Su eeL Liyiuing Maintenance District No. 6". SECTION 3. Des cri Lion of Assessment District: That the contemplate war in the opinion o sai3~ity't;o un ciTi~-more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which df stri ct is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior ho un dory lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 5 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6" maps is en fife in the office of the City Clerk of said Citv. SECTION 4. Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. ' as approve t e report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and e xt en[ of the assessments and for the extent of the work. ~O~ AESOLIRION PAGE 2 SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected at t e same time an in t e sane manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council wfll annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTIDN 6. Time and Place of Hearin Notice is hereby given that on November~III97, at t e lour a pm in the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho~Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must wntain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests ar objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardfno CourRy as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECT IDN 7. Lands ca in and Lighting Act of 1972: All the work herefn propose s all oe crone and Carr a roug n pursuance of mi act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1912, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Cal if ornfa. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be ma pursuan d ec ion o t e overrment Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Dail Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of n ario, a i ornia, and Circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ~~.. - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 7, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide r SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Tract Nos. 13542-1, 13475, and 10414 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 as Annexation No. 23 and setting the date of public hearing for November 4, 1987 RECOMIENOATI011 It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 23 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described tracts to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2. Analysis/Background Attached for City Council approval are resolutions declaring the City's int ant in rnnex Tract Nn< 175d9_1 13d 75 anA 1fM16 in Ctrnot linhtinn Maintenance District No. 2 as Annexation ~No. 23 and setting the public hearing date for November 4, 1981. Also attached for Council consideration are resolutions giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Reports for the sub,Ject annexation. Respe ~ s~ ed, C ~~ RHM:JAR Attachments -83 ,L~9i~J// _-" //~/~iy'~~~~E~~f /~li+~i94 Ot ca~ Ave. Rahc o Cucamohga, CA 91 3C I/ /f / LMO~/ (j Jr: ~~ ~~., ,I (+i ) .206 lo-fs 38¢ ~~ + 7e 95ooL ~• {t. W j (Poh /tu~c August 19, 1987 City 8pgineer Citq o! Rancho Cucasongs 9920 Baseline Road Rancho Cueasonga, CA 91730 Subject: Regtust to annex Tract 13b12-1 into the Landseape and Lighting Maintenance Distriet. Cientlnen: Me are subsittinq t63s letter a• our regaest to amex Traet 13612-1 into the appropriate landscape and lighting districts. The final landscape pleas !or Mllson Awnns haw been snbsittad iur pian cnecK. aneioaed L asap o! the anbdivisloA. The Wilson Avenue frontage will be the perisstsr parkway needed to be saintained by the landscape district. It Ss our understanding, that we are required to naiatala the parkway for a period o! one year alter installation. Please notify ue i! this is any di!lerant. Sincerely, Michssl D. Vairin, Vise-president icy <f2 ~~ay~ ~a~7a~ ~~ ~ ~~ yso~~ - - ~--v ~3e ~UUL rZ ~ ~ DCVP.IOpITletl~, I[IC. July 14, 1987 Linda Beek Engineering Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Rd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Tentative Tract /13475 Dear LTnda, Please be advised that we N.D.S. Development, Inc., the sub4l vi dors of the above mentioned tract, intend to form or Soin Landscape and Lighting Districts and to file same with The City Council. S~erely, . i- . ~ ~ Joseph Mulley ,Vice President i NDS Development, Inc. ~S GREG LUNDEEN L6:i~~/ SUsr~/ -Su_ i telephone. (818) 3313198 9ene21 bIO9. contl'dt4X slat! IiCMSE n0. b335123 l7 /o1S 26 AUGUST 1987 ~~~ ~~L TO: LINDA BEERS RE: LANDSCAPE/LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT DEAR LINDA, PLEASE CONSIDER THIS LETTER AS A REQUEST TO JOIN AND INCLUDE THIS TRACT (110{11) TO THE LANDSCAPE/LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. NE WILL SUBJECT THIS PROPERTY TO THE RULES, REGULATIONS AND OBLIGATIONS REQUIRED BY THE CITY AND THE DISTRICT. WE NOULD APPRECIATE YOUR EFPORTS IN THIS NATTER. SINCERPLY, ~ A /I _i.. GRE LUNDEEN 122 nOM roNKtdak / co~ru, callfomw 91723 / o ~ RESOL UTIQI N0. ~7~~ I / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ff CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 23 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2 NHEREAS, on October 7, 1987 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Lands taping and Lighting Att of 1972; and NHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and NtiEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESq.V ED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SELiiGi L, iimL Lim u~yi ueei ~a Eali mole ui Lim iLaui ceu wela aiu expenses o sue' ai3 work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to ar~d described-in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment Oistri ct are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sar~gssessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit tc be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for Lrle purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. /~F7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGR Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 Annexation No. 23 for Tract Nos. 13541-1, 13475 and 10414 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex the developments enumerated Sn Exhibit "A" into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2. The City Council has determined that the street tights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said tracts as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Mork to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of Street if ght improvements on local residential streets. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the Dist rid and cost shalt be Ai al AnA ~ :~ M.:- SECTION 3. Plans and Scecifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the wnditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to khe same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, ranoval or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvanents will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 including Annexation No. 23 is shown belay: 1. S.C.E. Mairrcenance mid Energy: Lanps Annex New Lanp Lamp Size* YTD No. 23 Total 5800E 1166 49 1215 9500E 4 --- 4 22,000E --- ___ ___ 27,500E ~ --- ___ ___ *High Pres sure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps Rate Mo's Maint. Cost 5800E 1215 X 3 8.93 K 12 5130,199.40 9500E 4 X 510.16 X 12 487.68 22.000E --- X 513.84 X 12 = 0 27,500 --- X 515.31 X 12 = 0 Total Annual Maint. Cost = E130,687.08 2. Costs per dwelling Unit: YTD Assessment Unit = 4,347; Assess. Unit this Annex. 252 Total 4,599 Total Annual Maintenance Cost = E130~6J87~.08 528.42/year/unit No. o nl 5 In t5 n Assessment shall apply to each lot as explained in Section 6. 2 SECTICN 5. Assessment Oiauram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2", Annexation No. 23. These diagrans are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTICN 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to ali units within the Distrito and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Mhere there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the District. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 3. City Counctl adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 5. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. 3 EXHIBIT "A" Properties and improvements to be inciuded within Annexation No. 23 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 2: ASSESS PROJECT UNIT 5800E 9500E 22,000E 27,500E TR 13542-1 206 38 TR 13475 29 13 TR 10414 11 10 252 49 4 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM w LL LL 6 S U STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.2 LL- ANNEXATION NO. 2 3 WILSON ,, =--r~---- ~~~ ,~ ;;, ~ ~~ ~, f`~~;^ crr~r of xexcxo cuc~-xorrae ~ 2_~ f ,_; •~ ~ COUNTY OF 8AN BESNABDINO ~; ` `,Z sTATE OF CALII+'ORPIIA ~ T ~~ ;,, - lv ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ,2 ANNEXATION NO. z 3 --- -- ,s~`~t ; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI[ON(iA :`'.,_`'.\'. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO n ,yr _, ~? STATE OF CALII~ORNIA - N im ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.2 ANNEXATION NO. 2,3 ,o~` " ~ ; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONOA ~, '" COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO n ~ y ~~`~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA - N im RESOLUTION N0. C~ ~ "~y~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MA INTEWIN CE DISTRICT N0. 2, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATIM qS ANNEXATION N0. 23 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT ff 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descri tion of Work: That the public interest and convenience require an i s t e inten ion of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Wark: The foregoing described work is to be located witTFin roadway n g -o -way enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 23 to Street Lighting Maintenance Df strict No. 2". SeuutN s. Uescn ption of Assessment District: That the contemplate~wor~in the opinion o sated ~y ounce is of-more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the ezt ere or boundary lines shown upon that certain "MoD of Annexation No. 23 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2" maps is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. Report of Engineer; The City Council of said City by Resolution No. as ao prove t e report of the engineer of work which re part indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, Che district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made far all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. `~ RESOLUTION PAGE 2 SECTION 5, Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected al-f tie sane me an n e sane manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which tfine assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearin Notice is hereby given that on November~,'Tg87, at tie our pm in the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Ranchc~Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is irM:erested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delfvered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or oblectiorK will be considered. If the signer of any protest is rqt shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain ar be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; All the work herein propose s all be done and Carrie roug n pursuance of an act of the legfslature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be ma pursuan a ection o t e overrment Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Dail Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of n an o, a i ornia, and Circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. "Vlp - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 7, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide J i SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Tract nos. 13542-I, 13475, 13353, 10414 and Parcel Map 10884 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No. 32 and setting the date of public hearing far Novenber 4, 1987 NECDMENDATI011 It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's ReDOrt for Annexation No. 32 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above descrfbed tracts to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. Analysis/Background Attached for City Council approval are resolutions declaring the City's intent to annex Tract Nos. 13542-1, 13475, 13353, 10414 and Parcel Map 10884 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 as Annezaf.inn 32 and setting the Dublic hearing date for November 4, 1987. Also attached far Council consideration are resolutions giving preliminary aDDroval of the Engineer's Reports for the sub,lect annexation. Respe 1 'lsubmitted, /~ ~,, RHM: :sd Attachments 191 RESOLUTION N0. ~~~5~3 A RESOLUTIOI OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDN G4, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 32 TO STREET LIGHTING M1IINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 WHEREAS, on October 7, 1987, the City Council of the City of Ran rho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required 6y the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said pct, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o s~ai~d work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, rn nt ai naA in <aiA ranart ha anA uarh of therm ar> ha.ohv rul(m: na..;t„ approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagr an showing the Assessment District referred to and describe in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and conf i rmed. SECT [ON 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's ReDOrt forme uurooses of all soh<.;quenr, prncaed;ngs, and pursuant Co *_he proposed district. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG4 Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation No. 32 far Tract Nos. 13542-1, 13475, 13353, 10414 and Parcel Map 10884 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of Californfa (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to 6e provided for with the assessments es tablfshed by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street li4ht impr ovemencs on my or streets (arterial and certain collector streets) as shown on the Lighting District Altas MaD which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the Oist rict and cost shall 6e assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved 6y the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting impravement on the individual development is hereby made a part of L'nis report to the sane extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all ~r airy part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. 1 SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by de veloDers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is tanprised of street light improvements on majar streets for residential improvenents (single family, multi-family, condominiums and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone will he assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and institutional projects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, wmnercial and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. I is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: Na. of lamps Lamps Annex New Lamp lamp Size* YTD No. 32 Total 5°DD'. nnn ~ 9500E 465 11 416 16,000E 16 0 16 22,000E 3 0 3 27.500E 15 0 15 *Mi gh Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lam s Rate Mo's Maint. Cost 5800E 444 % E 8.93 X 12 = $ 47,519.04 9500E 476 X $10.16 X 12 = 58,033.92 16,000E 16 X $12.08 % 12 2,319.36 22, UOOL 3 % $13.84 X 12 = 498.24 '~,~"U !5 X E15.31 X 12 = 2,755.SC Total Annual Maint. Cost = $111,186,20 2. Tot a1 Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation 14,062 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 316 Total Assessment Units 14,378 2 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost = 5111 186.20 57.13/year/unit No. o m sin istrict ~4,-37i~ Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1" Annexation No. 32. These diagrans are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. S ECTICIV 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all tes ti many and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. 3 E%HiBIT "A" Properties and improvenents to be included within Annexation No. 32 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 1: Assess. Pro ect Acreage nUii- 5300E 9500E 16, OOOL 22,000E 27,500E Zone 1 TR13542-1 --- 206 --- 7 --- --- --- TR 13415 --- 29 --- 2 --- --- --- TR 13353 --- 64 --- 2 --- --- --- TR 10414 --- 17 --- --- --- --- --- 316 11 Zane 2 PM 10884 Pcl 1 .9 1.8 --- --- --- --- --- Pcl 2 1_7 3_4 _ _ _ 2.6 5 --- --- --- --- --- TOTA L 289 11 - - 4 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION N0.32 i ~ \~.~~ O i~ ~I! i wL u ~~ ~~.~ w o , ~ C 0 ~ HA u ° ~ RI E " ,~ (Jl~j i a _ ~ 1 i 1 n RDS AVENUE ~ ~ ~~I ~~~~ I ~IOI"~,JU~~'~ ,~_~ ~ili~ '! ~I1~SU \~ VIII iGl ~I~ • ~ J L I ~ G: ~ , ~. ~~~ II n i~.a _ ~ _ IL ~ ~ ~ I ~I ~ iii ~ ~ ~~ ,~~s===== ~-'----==1~4 ~' ~~,, ~l ~;, i `,~~` " s ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI[ONOA ,~.\ . COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDIIVO _, `~' ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA - ~ T °~.,, Iv ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIOHTINCa MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION N0.32 _.,. 0 a .,,, •~ `~ -. _. _ .b.~ . n..~ ~,.a~`~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI[ONOA .,~ ~, ~ , COUNTY OF 9AN BERNARDINO ~: '~" STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~m __ y ~ N ~' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION N0.32 _• . ~,., .._ x.; LOT +~I~. ~ .r •`y O ai ~FTK a. .' a ~ LOT<i oOTG i +c, ; • K, ii i .~'~ one f- O ~ . i ~~~~ LOT! ~ ~;i~ is fer c ~ 3 ~~' ~ I w i -OT ! ' i.' ... .. ~ ~ i ~i 1 d Gorr e .r •_ 1 ,. •I: ~I: } i i I 31` '' ~~ I 8 n T~i SY ~- .. o S,a~`~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA .,:; ~- ~ COUNTY OF 8AN BEBNARDINO \ 3 sTATB OF CALII+ORNIA ~ T im lv ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION N0.3Z s~~i°j~~'_ CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1[ONOA .,_; .. ~ COUN'IR OF SAN BERNARDINO ~: ~; ='~~' srATE OF CALIFORNIA - N W im ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION N0.32 ~ ~--- -- 1~ I Y 7 ~~...~..~~ 7 Q l ~ 1 ~4.00~ pRA1NA~t ~~ ~ IARGCL PAirctL ~ o . ~ +I} ' ~ l i 0 2 ~ ' NOT A lAq .~o~ (~uoec) y. r ~ ~ , ~ r ~ v + PART c ~ i I A 1 y -~i ~ II'L 00~ . ' - ~.- ¢j0. //Lr '4 _ _ - -l- _ ~ ~_ _... ___ _ _. -. ~~~ 9450 LiNC _ K04D ~ ',~~~~ CPfY OF RANCHO CUCA1[ON(~A ~ M _ ., ; ~ ~ ..\' . COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO - ?~ ~ _ _~~' STATE OF CALIFORNU ~ T _ ,^, -. l~l RESOL UT [LN N0. O 7 " $7 A RESOL UT[ON OF THE CITY COLN CIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA, CA LIFORN IR DECLARING ITS INTENT [CN TO ORDER THE AN NE NATION TO STREET LIGHTING MA INTEIWN CE DISTRICT N0. 1, qN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNE NATI ON AS ANNE NATI ON N0. 32 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF :972 ANO OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE [T RESOLVED by the City Caun cii of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being pivi si on 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descri ti on of Work: That the public interest and conveniencece requrre an it,rs t e n en on of this City Council to farm a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Satd maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located wit"- ri~adway n g t-o -way enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the uif iie u( iiie Cii:y Cier•k, enci Lied °A one xan on No, s[ to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1". SECT ICN 3. Descri tp ion of Assessment District: That the contemplate wor in the opim on o said Lit~il-ice-more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes Che expense of the said work ch ar gea6le upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All Chat certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 32 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1" maps is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. S ECTIOV 4. Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. * has approved the report of Che engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the di sf-ict boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Li gh tirig Maintenance District No. 1" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made far all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. ao8 RESauTlan PAGE 2 SECTIDV 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected a~E>!e sane ime an n t e same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTIQi 6. Time and Piace of Hearin Notice is hereby given that on Novenber 7, .~ our o pm rn the City Councii Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho~CUCamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not De formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the sane, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior Lo the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last eWalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 1. Landsca in and L1 htin Act of 1972: A11 the work herein propos~s~iall a ne an cart a roug rn pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1912, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION B. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be made pursuant to ection o t e over anent Cede. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Oail Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of n ar o, a ornf a, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ao9 CITI' OF RAtiCHII Cl'C'A~tONG~1 STAFF REPORT DOTE: October 7, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell R. Maguire, City Engineer 8Y: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval to Annex DR 86-21 (Industrial/Commercial area) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 as Annexation No. 7 and setting the date of public hearing for November 4, 1987 REC01lENMTI01 It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 7 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described projects to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3. Artalysi s/Background Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex DR 86-21 ( Ind ust riai/Comnerci al areal to iannc vane Maintenance District No. 3 for Annexation No. 7 and setting the public hearing date for November 4, 1987. Also attached far Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. Letters from the developers requesting the subject annexation are on file in the Engineering Division. Res pec~,f V,l;Ty submitted, i ~ ,, , ,- ~. _. RH M:JAA-:s6~ Attachments ~~~ RESOLUTION N0. D ~ ~ ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMON G4, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL aF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNE %ATI ON N0. 7 TO LAN OSCAPE M4INTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 WHEREAS, on October 7, 1987, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1; That the Engi neer~s Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses ohs ai~work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily ay pl ll vcV aIIV wlll IIIIR'u. SECTION 2; That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and describe in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and ca of i rme d. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sai-'3 Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and co of i,med. S ECT TON 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for C~purpos es of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed d~stri ct, a-~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG4 Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 ANNEXATION N0. 7 For DR 86-21 SECTION 1. Authority for Reoort This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, The City Council has determined the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon alt the developments as mentioned above. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed developments are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right-of-way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cuc anon ga. SECTION 3, Plans and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject development plan and the assessment diagram for the enact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and >N«{f i~nliwo fui iaaiu,tapeu iaryruvement un cire individual ae veiopment is herehy made a part of this retort to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred by the District for parkway and median improvement construction, All improvements will be constructed by developers and ur/by the City. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (8.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on act uai cost data. '_an ds ca pe Maintenance District No. 3 has heen demarcated into two nines. Zone i is comprised of Parcel Map 7349, comprised of 8 parcels, totaling 6,057 square - - di;ti id wd, fur fined in Ocluber 5, i963, for the maintenance of lam dscaping~~a detention basin and storm drain within the project. This zone will be assessed on per lot basis for the maintenance costs within the project boundary only as stipulated in the Engineer's Report for the formation of the District. Zone 2 S5 comprised of all other projects that are being annexed or will be annexed to this District. All lots or parcels within Zone 2 will be assessed on net acre basis for the maintenance of landscaped median islands on Haven Avenue from 4th Street to Deer Creek Channel, Foothill Boulevard and 4th Street from west to east City limit, Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue, Fran 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard, 6th Street from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue and median islands on other major divided highways and same parkways within the Industrial Specific Plan Area and Foothill Boulevard overl ay area. The estimated cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 including Annexation No. 1 is as follows. Zone 1 Existing District Total es tfmated maintenance cost Assessment units Total cost - assessment unit for year and month Zone 2 .A maintenanceyarea=~^Sq. Ft. Assessment acres Total cost r assessment unit for year and month E2,070 8 E2~70 Ez58.75/year or E21.56/mo. Existing .4 nnexation New District No. 7 Total 0 0 G 380,513.64 2,54 380,516.18 O~x Er3~0 = E 0 /year 0 /mo. Assessment shall aDPly to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A", by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated ..,thin the .c zt of this report. 2 SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all iots within the District and that assessment shall 6e equal for each parcel for Zone 1 and shall be equal to the next acreage for each lot or parcel in Zone 2. The City Council will hold a puhl is hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report, 2, City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 3, City Council conducts puhlic hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4, Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. 3 Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 5 (Zone 2) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3: PROPERTIES PROJECT ACREAGE DR 86-2: 2.54 (parcel 9 of PM 4594) TOTAL: 2.54 Acres IMPROVEMENT AREAS TO BE ANNE%EO IN ANNEf(A TION N0. 1 Area Salt. Haven Avenue 0 Foothill Boulevard 0 Milliken Avenue 0 4th Street 0 Rochester avenue D 6th Street 0 4 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 ANNEXATION N0.7 i .,....r"::: ~ ~.....~...~ ~.e._.. ~ '__ ~ li~ aW j S ' .nw. O U Z ` -~ ~ z W y ~-- danam owu ;,~'i`~'~~O'=, CITY OF RANCHO Cl1CA~~fONGA ^ DR 8-21 ,.l . = / ~~.;~ ;~, p ENGINEERING DIVISION ~ T ~' 6 1`,I, ~ VICINITY MAP Ian RESOLUTION N0. 8 / - ~ ~~ A RESOLUTI CH OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAN10NGq, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENT [ON TO ORDER THE AN NE XATI GN TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 7 TO LAN OSCAPE M4INTENAN CE DISTRICT N0. 3; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT aF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO n OW, THE REFIXtE BE IT RESOLED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Description of Work: That the public interest and convenience require audit is t~iniention of this City Council to form a maintenance district in ChG City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those parkways and faciliites thereon dedicated for canon greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof, Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any sprinkler system, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornanental ?ighti ng, structures, and walls in connection with said parkways. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located wi t~Fin roadway n- g'~Fti o~-way and landscaping easenents of Landscape ~4aillL cu aul.C Ula Ll i~L 11 u. J CII WICI aLeu III LIIC Itlp UIL ui Llltl 1.1 ly CIIg IIICCt' allU more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 1 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3". SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the co ntempl atet~wor rc, in the op mono sae ity ounce , is o more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho C ~tamnn ga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annezatf on No. 7 to Landscape iAaintenante Oistric[ No. 3" heretofore approved by the City Council of said City by Resolution No. *, indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within the proposed assessment district and which map is on file in the office of the Ctty Clerk of said City. a~~ RESOLUTION PAGE 2 SECTION 4. Re rt of En ineer: The City Council of said City by Res of utionn N~Fas approve t e repo of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Annexation No. 7, landscape Maintenance District No. 3" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of safd City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the anount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall 6e collecte ad L t eFi-same tme an n t same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time ass essnents for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearfn Notice is hereby given that on November~T987, armour o :36~n the City Councii Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extetrt of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the sane, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon thx last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property Ant rrihnd in thn nrnt u<ic ihon cn_rh rnf ne• m et nn~ain n. ho _ nA M_, written evidence that such signer is the owner 'of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landsca in and Li ht in Act of 1972: All the work herein propos~~e -s Fall a one an carte t roug to pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be mama e~pursuant tot o~-Section o t e over anent Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the sane to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in Che City of Ontario, a t or ni a, and circulated in the City of Rancho i. ui dm Ongd, ral if pr ni ~, ~~~ -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 7, 1987 T0: City Council and Cf ty Manager FR~I: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer i BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Tract Nos. 13542-1, 13475, 13353 and 10414 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No. 38 and setting the date of public hearing for November 4, 1987 ~ RECOMEIIDRTIDN It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 38 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described projects to Landscape Maintenance District Ho. 1. Analysis/Background Attached for City Council approval Ss a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex Tract Nos. 13542-1, 13475, 13353 and 10414 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Annexation Nn. 3A and ~orrin~ itio ,.~~nl!~ nearing date for November 4, 1987. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. Letters fran the developers requesting the subject annexation are on file in the Engineering Division. Respe ctfu submitted, ~ / R :s Attachments a~q RESOLUTION N0. p / ' ~ ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUiCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATIQI n0. 38 TO LANDSCAPE MR INTEIIANCE OISTRI CT N0. 1 WNEREAS, on October 7, 1987, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and MHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor arty part thereof, requires or should 6e modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o~said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in safd report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily annrnucd anA rn nfi nno d. SECTION 2: That the diagran showing the Assessment District referred to and descr~e~in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed, SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivf sf ons of land in said- s~sment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECT[GN 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report fort a purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the orooosed district. ago RESOLUTION N0. 0 ~ ~ ~ ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CODICIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 38 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 WHEREAS, on October 7, 1987, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing a5 required by the Landscaping and Lighting qct of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing a5 called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o sar work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and coMirmed. SECTION 2: That the dfagran showing the Assessment uistnct reienr;J to and descrirl-e~in safd report, the 6aundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and conf i rmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sar ssessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, fran safd work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4; That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for- tie purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. aao CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA Engineer's Report for sction b and the Landscape Maintenance Oistri ct No. 1 ANNE%ATION N0. 38 for y this annexation Tract Nos. 13542-1, 13475, 13353 and 10414 h are designated fined by an active SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter r this report antl 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of Cal ifornfa eby incorporated (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new subdivisions into Landscape 1 benefit to all Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the areas to 1 for each unit be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract Nos. 13542-1, . e7 of assessable 13475, 13353 and 10414 as well as on the tats directly abutting the landscaped aortional to the areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right-of-way or easenents to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ~ to determine the SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications ~ City during the rents as required The plans and lands caDing are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The Dl ans ~ City Engineer's and specificatiors for landscaped improvement on the individual development is irereuy moue Mort °f :hie ^_ ^^t +^ iho came ezt ent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. listrict and sets SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No casts will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All testimony and frogs. improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that ;he City Council. maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (E. 30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will tic hearing and be based on actual cost data. ants. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 including Annexation No. 38 is as follows; Ezititi ny Annex New District No. 38 Total Landscape Area 867,014 9,292 876,366 No. of Assess. Units 8,693 284 8,977 Per lot Annual Assessment E76 36 _ $29.29 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. Z ANNEXATION N0. 3B . c..~,+o +vevue y ~•a~T . ~. ~. ~ ~ i I ~.li •f• ~ u Lor i . ~ _ YID f~l• ~~~.. C , r.'-- , `t it 'f cote ~ ~ LOT G ~s ~ a E ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ e ' ~ .~ ^ ' y i j coT t .::j.. ~ ~ f iN .~. j 9 9 r w„ .Oi d ~l ~ . r .. .. l' t f~ i ~. O • 4CSj _ •"~~• a w ' rTi. e.~ e __~~__ t f~~rlG ~-w artee• S ` ` ~ C _-_ __ -._ ~. `~c. ai~M CITY OF RAtiCHO CL;CAMOIVGA w i r' 3 ~ r~~,~~.~ s' EtiGINEERING DI~'IS10~: }~ ~z ~`IT ~I m ~' VICIYITY `tAP 1 \ D 8 a s ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION NO. 38 c~c 4n ~.~°~ ~ ,r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAhI( ~. , ?' *..r.E~ ENC;INEERItiG DIVISION ~~ 'i ~` r,n ' VICINITY MAP N PaBz RESOLUTION N0. ~ ~ - S 7 8 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COINCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOCIGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 38 TO IANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1; PLRSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING ANO LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTIpI 1. Descri Lion of Work: That the public interest and conveniencece require and-i'~is t e ntent on of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those parkways and faciliites thereon dedicated for common greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any sprinkler system, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lightf ng, structures, and walls in Connection with said parkways. SECTION 2. Location of Mork: The foregoing described work is to be located w~tTlin roadw aV na -a -wav and 1anAc ran;o„ oa«o_n~< s i,., n..,.,,. Maintenance District No. l~en umer a£e4 in the report Hof the City Engineer wand more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 38 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1". S ECTIOV 3. Descri Lion of Assessment District; chat the coot empla a wor to the optm on o sat t y ounct , s o more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the casts and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shaven upon that Certain "Map pf Annexation No. 38 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1" Heretofore approved by the City Council of said City by Resolution No. *, indicating 6y said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within the proposed assessment district and which map is ~n file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. aas RESOLUTION PAGE 2 SECTI QI 4. Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. as approved t e repo of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Annexation No. 38, Landscape Maintenance District No. 1" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected aE~~same ime an in a sane manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which Lime assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined, SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hear~~inqq: Notice is hereby given that on Novenber 7, a ur o PMTn the City Council Chambers at 9161 base Line, in the City of Rancho~Cucamonga, any and all persons having any ob,Jections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be Sn writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or obie ctions will be wu>iJereJ. it the signer or any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must wntain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Lan ds ca Pi ng and Lighting Act of 1972: All the work herein propose s all be done and carte t roug in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be made pursuan o section o t e overnnent Code, The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the sane to be published 10 days before the date set fur tiie lie aring, at least once in the Dail Re rt, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of n ario, a i ornia, and circulated fn the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, ~a 9 - ORDINAN~ N0. 32(1 AN ORDINAN~ OP TNH QTY COUNCIL OP THH QTY OP RANCNO CUGfpK;A, GLIPORNIA, APPROPING HTIWANDA SPHQFIC PLAN AMBNDMHNT (H. S. P.) 87-02 RHQU63TING LAND ON TB8 NORTR SIDH OF POOTAII.L HWLSPARD BH1liEEN TAH I-IS PRHENAY AND EAST APSNUE, THH SOUTNHAST Q]RNffit OP FOOTRILL BOULEPARD AND ETIWANDA APENUB, AND THH SQJTHWP3T WRNHR OF F00111ILL BOULEPARD AND EAST AVBNUE 86 llHLETED FRON TNB S.S.P. W}IEItHAS, the Gity Count il' of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, does ordain ae follove: SECTION 1: The Aawcho Cucmonga City Cowcil has made the folloriag findings: 1. lfiat the eubj eci properties are pari of the Pooth ill Boulevard Specific Pim es recomreaded for approval by the Plmning Commission. ~a Planning Commiuion recomended that the City Couocil approve sad adopt Etirmda Specific Plsn Amendment 87-02 eubj act to the City Council edopiion of: A, General P1 en Ameadmen[ 87-03B: end B. Pooth ill Boulevard Specific Plen. 2. That the eubj act property is 9ui tahl. s.;. -~. yeaaisceo ra sne proposed Pooth ill Boulevard Specific P1 m~in~terme of access, size, and compatibility rich ezieting land use in the surrounding area; aad 3. That the proposed district change rould not have significant impact on the em ironment, nor the surrounding properties; and 4. That the proposed district change ie in conformance rich the General P1 en, SECTION 2: lbe Rancho Cutmonge Pl ginning Commission bee found that Chia project rill not create a eignificent adverse impact on the environment end recommends ieeuente of a Negative Declare[ion on July 22, 1987. NOW, 1HPREPORE, BB IT RESOLPED: 14iat the City Council adopted General Pl en Amendment 87-03B end the Pooch ill Houl everd Specific P1 en oa Septmher 16. 1981. 2~ Ordinance No. 320 Page 2 2. that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucuongs hea held e public hearing is the time end manner prescribed by lar and duly heard nod 6aa detestined that the properties on the north aide of Foothill Boulevard betreen the I-15 Predey ud Heat Avenue, the southeast corner of Poothill Boulevard and Etiranda Avenue, sod the southwest corner of Poothill Boulevard and Hest Avenue ae indicated in Srb ibit ^A^ be deleted from the 6tirudn Specific PS u. SBGTION 3: The Mayor shall sign th ie Ordinate and the City Clerk shall cause the sue to be published within fifteen (15) after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, s adepaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California end circulated in the City of Rancho Wcuonga, California. PtSSHD, APPROp80, and ADOPTBD t6 ie **** day of *, 198*. AYHS: NOS: ABSHNT: * ATTHST: Beverly A. Autheleq City G1 ark Denis L. Stout, Mayor I, HHYffiU.Y A. AUTHHLBT, CITY CLHRK of the City of Rancho Cucuonga. Cal ifornie, do hereby certify then the foregoing Ordiumce wee introduced at a regular messing of the Council of the City of Rancho Cutuonga held on the 16th deq of Sep[uber, 1987, and pea finally passed et • regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucuanga held on the **th day of *, 198*. ~cecuted this **th 3ay of *, 198* at Rancho Cucamonga, Gal ifornie. Beverly A. Authelet, City Cdetk a.~ ~ ORDINANlB N0. 321 AN ORDINANCE OF TR6 CITY COB NCIL OP THB CITY OP RAN(NO (A CdlbNGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROpING INgISTRIAL ARHA SPBClFiC PLAN (I. S. P.) AMENDMENT 87-01 REQUBS TING LAND ON THE SOOTN SIDH OP FOOTHILL HOULHgARD 881NEffi7 THH I-15 PRBB4)AY AND ETINANDA AgffiR1E BH DBLBTBD FROM TRH I.S.P. WNPi18A5, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucemmga, does ordain ae Follwe: SECFION 1: The Rancho Cucmonga City Comcil has made the follwing f indinge: 1. That the aubj act properties ere past of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan es recouended for approval by the Flaming Commission. the Flaming Commiaaim racammandad thai the City Cowcil apptwa and adopt Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 87-01 eubj act to the City Co:mcil sdoptim of: A, General Plan Amendment 87-lb B; and 8. Pootbill Boulevard Specific Plan. 2. that the subject property is suiubla fns the uses persitted in the propowd Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan in terms of access, • _. ._____~ _-~ ......a 1:.:... ~.. a.. iua •utauuudivg area; and r 3. 'fiat she propowd district change would noC hove significant impact on the environment, nor ffie surromding properties; end 4. That the propowd district chmge is in conformance rich the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rmncho 4luamonga Pl ginning Commission hw found that this project vi11 not create s significant adverse impact on the ew ironment and recommends issuance of a Negative Decl eration on July 22, I987, NON, THEREFORH, BH IT RES OLgSD: That the CiTy Council adopted General Plen Pmendment H7-Q3H and the Foothill Houl evsrd Specific P1m on September 16, 1987. a32 Ordimnce No. 321 Page 2 2. "That the City Cowcil of the City of Raneho Cucamonga has held e pvhl is hearing in the time and meaner prescribed by lea and duly heard end bee determined that the properties on the south aide of Paotb ill Boulevard beWem the I-15 Pieerey and 6tiranda Avenue as indicsted on Erh !bit ^A" be deleted from the Industrial Atee Specific P1 m. SHCfION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance sad the City Qerk shall cause the eewe to be publ !eked sithin fifteen (IS) after ice paseege et leset once is The Daily ReDOrq a newspaper of general cinulaiioa publ !eked in the City of Ontario, Csl ifornie and circulated is the City of Reecho Cucamonga, California. PASSHD, APPROPED, end ADOPTED this **** day of *, 198*. AYES: * NOBS: * ABSENT: ATTEST: Beverly A. Autbel et, City Clerk Dennis L. Stout, Mayor I, BE9HRLY A. AUTNHLET, CITY Cl.B1tR of Che City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cal ifornie, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordimace rae introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 16th day of Septetber, 1987, and rae finally pnaaed eta regal er meeting of the City Council of [hs City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the **** day of *, 198*. Hrecuted th ie **** day of *, 198* et Rancho Cucamonga, California. Beverly A. Authelet, City Qerk X33 ORDINANCB N0. 322 follwe: AN ORDZNAN(E OP TNH QTY COUNCIL OP TBE QTY OF RANCHO CUCAIt7NGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING pICTORIA NMNUNITY PLAN AMENDl~NT 87-01, TO MDDI IR THE W[97UNITY PLAN THHT TO REDUCE 1RH MINIMUM LOT DEPT!! ON 3,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS FROM 75 FEET TD 60 PEST, 10 AEDO(E THE MINIMUM LOT DEPTH ON 4,000 SQUARH FOOT LOTS FROM BO FEHT TO 70 PEST, AND TO REQUIRE A MINIMUM THN (30) FOOT PRONT YARD SETEA(R FOR 1HE LIpItd; ARBA ON 3,000 AND 4,000 SQUARH FOOT LOTS 'Eae City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, does ordain ae SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines as Follws: A. That the Planning Commisaiw of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, follwiag a publ lc hearing held in the time sad manner by lar, recommends the Com:mity Plan tent amendment hereinafter described, sod this City Counc it hea held a public hearing in the time nod manner prescribed by lar end duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. the[ the Amendment will provide for development of e comprehensively plmned urban community rithin the District that ie superior to development otherrise ellweble order alternate ~e,.l...,,..e. C. That the Amendment rill provide for development rithin the Dietric[ in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development and grwth management pol iciee of the City. D. Thst the Amendment rill provide for the construction, imprwemenq or ezteneion of transportation feeil tries, public aril tries, and public services required by development rithin the District. SECTION 2: The Community P1 en tezt of the Victoria Planed Conmunity is hereby amended co reed ae follwe: A, The minimum required lot depth on 3,000 square foot lots shall be ^_0 feet. H. 'D:e minimum required lot depth on 4,000 square foot lots shall be 70 feet. a~s~ Ordinaoce No. 322 Page 2 C. The minimum front yard setback for the fire[ story living erect of the dwell ing unit shell be ten (30) feet. Any second story shall be eetbeak further ffim tea (10) feeC eubj act to approval during Design Ravie¢ of the tract. Yt:e setbsek area shall be landscaped and is ezcl ueive of velkmaye or structures. SHCTION 3: The Mayor shell sign this Ordinance end the City Clerk aha21 cause the same to be publ iehed within fifteen (15) days after its passage et least Dace in Th¢ Deily Resort, a ndepaper of general circul etion published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California. PASS®, APPROVHD, end ADOPTED [his **** day of *, 198*. AYES: * Noes: * ABSENT: ATTEST: Beverly A. Au[hel et, City Clerk Demie L. Stout, Mayor I, BEVERLY A. AUTRELHT, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cal ifornie, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordimnce wee introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Rnncho Cucamonga held on the 16th day of September, 1987, end was find ly passed eta regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the **** say of *, 198*, Executed th ie **** day of *, 19g* et Rancho Cucamonga, Glifornia. Beverly A. Auth¢1 et, City Gl ark W ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: October 7, 1987 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cynthia Kinser, Assistant Planner ~'~ cx^^~o,~'•n ~;i 6 ~Z 1977 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT amen n o c ange a eve opmen s r e s es gnatian from the existing designations to Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (FBSP) for all properties adjacent to Foothill Boulevard from Grove Avenue to Deer Creek Channel and from the I-15 Freeway to East Avenue within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Pian area. I. RECgMENDATION: At its meeting of September 23, 1987, the Planning amm s>:Tion recamlended the City Council approve Developaent District Amendment 87-09. If the City Council concurs, adoption of the attached Ordinance of Approval would be appropriate. II. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: The proposed designation change for the area w n e oo TT1-Boulevard Specific Plan is necessitated by the adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan on September 15, 1987. The amendment will change the existing designation to Fuu uiiii Guui evaru jyel'IiiC Ylan irJY1 TOr t00Se propertl es w1 Lh10 the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (see Ordinance Exhibit "q"). [11. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The land use impacts of the SDecific an were a equa e y a ressed in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment 87-038 Environmental Impact Report as certified on September 16, 1987. IV. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning Commission at its meeting o ep er resolved to recommend the City Council adopt Development District Amendment 87-09. Re full bmitted, City anner BB:CK:te Attachments; Planning Commission Staff Report of September 23, 1987 Resolution of Approval Draft Ordinance of Approval n rmv nc o e wrn vn n,rn"""nwrn ~ STAFF REPORT ~~'~ ~~.~ o ~ ~ U > DATE: September 23, 1987 i9n T0: Chairamn and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, Cfty Planner BY: Cynthia Kinser, Assistant Planner SU&IECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEYELOPMENT DISTRICT amen n o c ange a eve oilmen s r c es gnattons from the existing designations to Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (F. S. P.) for all properties adlacent to Foothill Boulevard from Grove Avenue to Deer Creek Channel and from the I-15 Freeway to East Avenue within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan area. ABSTRACT: This is an administrative action necessitated by the as o~p£fon of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan to change the Development Districts Map for the properties within the Foothill Boulevard SDeci H c Plan area from the existl ng designations to Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan IF. S. P. ). The Planning Commstsston will review, take Public testimony. and consider staff's recommendation on the matter. Staff recommends approval of the Development District Amendment. Ii. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: The proposed development district c angel are ac ons necessary due to the adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (see Resolution, Exhibit "A'). fie Development District Nnendment will change the designation to Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (F. S. P.) for properties within Lhe Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan area. IIt. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This action provides for the e m na on o ex s ng zoning provisions and adoption of the Development District designation "F. S. P." for those properties regulated by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. The land use impacts of the SDeciftc plan have been adequately addressed in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment 87-038 ' Environmental Impact Report as certified on September 16, 1987. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Should the Commission, upon examination of the su ec eve oilmen District Amendment, decide t',at the changes would promote the land use goals and policies of the General Plan, would not cause significant adverse environmental Impacts, the following findings are necessary for approval. a~~ ITEM K PLANNING COMMISSI~w STAFF REPORT DDA 87-09 -City of Rancho Cucamonga September 23, 1987 Page 2 A. The Mcendsents do not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan; and B. The Amendcents do promote goats of the Land Use Element; and C. The Amendments would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the ad,~acent properties; and U. That the sub,iect properties are suitable for the uses penaitted in the proposed district 1n terws of access, size and caagat1bt11ty with existing land uses in the surrounding areas. IY. RECpMENDATION: .Staff recommends the Planning Coswlssion recaaaaend approve a evclopment Districts AmendaKnt 87-09 to the City Council by the adoption of the attached draft Resolution. Respe fully submitted, _~' Bra u e City P anner BB:CK:vc Attachments: Draft Resolution of Approval ~_~, aas 1 RESOLUTION N0. 87-177 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT N0. 87-09, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP FROM THE EXISTING "GC" (GENERAL COMIAERCIALI, "OP" (OFFICE/ PROFESSIONAL), "M' (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL), FC" {FLOOD CONTROL), 'ISP' (INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN), AND "ESP" (ETINANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT) TO "FSP" (FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC.PLAN) FOR 560 ACRES OF LAND (SEE EXHIBIT "A") ADJACENT TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN GROVE AVENUE ANO DEER CREEK CHIWNEL AND BETWEEN THE I-15 FREEWAY AND EAST AVENUE WITHIN THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN WHEREAS, on the 10th day of September, 1987 an application was filed and accepted on the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 23rd day of September, 1987, the Planning Commission heid a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Canmission has made the following'Tindings: i. iu"L Liie wuj e~L yruyer Ly is sui Labie fur the uses permiLCed in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and a dpatibiltty with existing land use in the surrounding area; 2. That the proposed district change would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed district change is in conformance with the General plan. SECTION 2: This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed ate- con~dered Tn compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 by the certification of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment 87-038 Environmental Impact Report as certified on Septc,~ber 16, 1987. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLYEO: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Conmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 23rd day of September 1987, District Amendment No. 87-09. a3q PLANNING CgMISSION RESOLUTION N0. DDA 87-09 - City of Rancho Cucamonga Septe~ber 23, 1987 Page 2 2. The Planning Caamission hereby reca®aends that the City Council approve and adopt District Amendment No. 87-09, as described 1n the title and indicated in the attached Exhibit 'A". 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by tJle planning CaRmission shall be forwarded to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED TH15 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1987. I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Caamlission of the City of Rancho COCamonaa, An harahv rar}ifv fhi4 fhn fnrn~ni n~ Dnenl9ti nr ., . e~l~ ~.~ regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning CaamlTssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Caamission held on the 23rd day of September, 1987, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EME RICK, TOLS OTY, SLAKES LEY, CHI TIEA, NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: nCNIEL ayo PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA GROVE n 'T1 0 .~- S W O C_ 01 a v fY '0 0) 7 .~ v so to 0) .~« O 7 0 r O 0 1 S r VINEYARD NELLMAN ARCNIBALD NAVEN ETIWANDA a v~ EAST ,. ~, k m v a m; 'm; r+.: ' ~; ~,. , M ORDINANCE N0. ~~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT N0. 87-09, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP FROM THE E%ISTIN6 "GC" (GENERAL COMMERCIAL), "OP" (OFFICE/ PROFESSIONAL), "M" (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL), 'FC" (FLOOD CONTROL), "I SP" (INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN), AND "ESP' (ETINANOA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT) TO "FSP" (FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN) FOR 560 ACRES OF LAND (SEE EXHIDIT "A") ADJACENT TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETNEEN GROVE AVENUE AND DEER CREEK CHANNEL AND BETNEEN THE I-15 FREENAY AND EAST AVENUE NITHIN THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and deterwlnes the following; A. That the Planning Cammisston of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, fallowing a public hearing held in the time and canner prescribed by law, recaamends the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a puDiic hearing 1n the time and manner prescribed by law and duly heard and 1. VilpiUCi pY iGiU ICL UIMIR'IIUO LI UII. B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. That this rezoning is consistent with the obiectlves of the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. D. That this rezoning has been reviewed and considered in campllance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 by the certificaton of the Foothill Boulevard SDecific Plan and General Plan Amendment 87-038 Environmental Impact Report as certified on September 16, 1987. SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned in the manne-~a-ted, and the development district map is hereby amended as indicated in Exhibit "A": a yam. cIn couNCIL ORDINANCE No. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 87-09 October 7, 1987 page 2 THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP SHALL BE AMENDED FROM THE EXISTING 'GC` (GENERAL COMMERCIAL), "OP' (OFFICE/ PROFESSIONAL), 'M" (MEDIUM DENSIn RESIDENTIAL), "FC" (FLOOD CONTROL), "I SP' (INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN), AND 'ESP" (ETINAIDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT) TO 'FSP" (FOOTHILL BOtILEYARD SPECIFIC PLAN) FOR 560 ACRES aF LAND ADJACENT TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETNEEN GROVE AVENUE AND DEER CREEK CHANNEL AND BETNEEN THE I-15 FREEYAY AND EAST AVENUE NITHIN THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN ava GROVE 'TI N ~. Q .-r S W 0 c_ m a ~a ~. ~o 7 (A 7 d .~ O VINEYARD HELLMAN ARCHIBALD HAVEN m L 9 p ~ A ~ fl 9 =~i' _ ~ ~ ETIW ANDA F~~~y ~~ - ~~f m to o b o EAST ~ I/ r 0 m k 3 v a m m 0 M O o x i ~ - CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: October 7, 1967 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: OFF-SITE SUBDIVISION DIRECTIONAL SIGH ~i~Mp~ ~~~~, ~i , ,, yi ~ ~. A F' 6 ~4-; I. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City ounl~ciTapprove the proposed amendment. II. IWALYSIS: On April 1, 1987, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. '309 rich established regulations for off-site subdivision directional signs within planned communities. On August 26, 1987, the Planning Commission reconsidered how the provisions of Ordinance No. 309 would apply to the Victoria Planned Community. The Commissfon supported the concept of allowing planned communities the ability to prepare a sign program with greater flexibility than what is currently permitted sublect to Commission approval and directed staff to prepare an amendment. The amendment ii Jc>a iucu ai icily uei uw. Number of Signs Permitted: Ordinance No. 309 was drafted to Para i-eT- rEl-e e~t~g~IA sponsored off-site subdivision program used City-wide. A maximum of six sign panels nay be used to lead customers to the site in the BIA program. WT thin the planned communities, Ordinance No. 309 allows a maximum of six signs to Lead the customer to the site (see Exhibit "A"). However, Section 14.20.065E states that developers within the planned communities may also participate in the BIA program provided "that a combination of a maximum of six signs may be used to lead customers to the site." From a practical standpoint, it may take six signs ,lust to lead a customer from the City limits on Base Line to Victoria. The off-site sign program within the Windrows Village illustrates what tf~e lJilliam Lyon Company would propose as the minimum program needed to lead customers to the site (see Exhibit "D"1. Fifteen sign panels are used to direct customers to each of the three model home sales offices. ays CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: OFF-SITE SUBDIVISION DIRECTIONAL SIGNS October 7, 1987 Page 2 The Commission recommends that Ordinance No. 309 be modified to require the submittal of a sign program for off-site directional subdivision signs subject to the approval of the Coamission. TAe sign program would include the de Wiled design and placement of each sign and sign structure. B. Use of Fla s: The Sign Ordinance allows a maximum of six flags n con unc on with a sales office. The flags must be displayed in the immediate vicinity of the sales office and must be located outside the public right-of-way. The Nilliam Lyon Company desires flags along their major entry roads, such as Victoria Park Lane or Milliken, because their models are located interior to Ytctoria. The Planning Commission believed that the existing Victoria monument signs and BIA directional sign structures located at their major entry roads provided ample notice to prospective buyers that there are homes for sale within Ytctoria. Flags were also found undesirable within public right-of-way because of the potential for liability, maintenance and enforcement problems. Re/ fully submitted, Brad B 1e~ City anner BB: DC:ko Attachments: Minutes of July 8, 1987 Commission Meeting Exhibit "A" - Off-Site Signs Nithin Planned Communities Exhibit "B" - Header Board Regulations Exhibit "C" - Flag Regulations Exhibit "D" - Nindrows Sign Program Commission Resoluttor. No. 87-153 Ordinance ayc~ 1JFV ";: ~ concern witTi~ ~i+ ~ f~ availability ~'=9^?"l~;w?`used in Vic unacceptable. ~f : r ice of the PYC and the long-term maintenance and fencing material. He does not want to see`PYCr ~'" ~ it is not up to their standards and'~`is " Discussion was heard regarding the ntages and disadvantages of PVC, three-rail and two-rail wood fencing. Commission approved 3-2, McNiel and Chitiea disapproving, an except to the city standard three-rail PVC fencing for equestrian traits within Yictoria Planned Community only. The new standard will be three-rail woo cing. Z. VICTORIA OFF-SITE SUBDIYISION SIGN PR06RAM Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that a sign program which helps direct people in the subdivision would certainly be beneficial because of the uniqueness of the planned community. Mr. Jim Bailey, representing William Lyon Company, stated that the current sign ordinance does not work in Victoria since it is a master planned community. He indicated he wants to develop a sign program that works for their projects. Chairman McNiel stated he did not see a problem with keeping the signs now existing and let them phase out in seven to eight months. Commissioner Chitiea agreed with Chairman McNiel regarding the existing signs and commented she did not mind seeing the flags at the models. The Planning Commission supports the concept to allow planned communities the ability to prepare sign programs subject to the Planning Cammissi on approval. They further directed staff to prepare a code amendment to the sign ordinance. x x r x r COMMISSION-$USINESS T Chairman McNiel and EoaLnfssioner Chitiea would like to be on the subcommittee for the Vic to r7a~.l.ake s. ~+• ~. ~~ PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public camnents. • a . ~ Planning Commission Minutes 33 July 08, 1987 :~, :~ , ~y~ ~ i. f "14,20. C65 Pe.*mitted st^ns -- Off-site subdivision directional s within P apnea uommum y; e o owing emporary signs nay oe perms xi n any panne community, rhicn was estaoltsned pursuant to Seci 17.14,020, sub,~ect t0 Cne provisions listed: "A. A maximum of stx skins may be used sol ety LO lead_ cus tamers to the Si Ce wi Lein the lapped commumL Signs sna11 oe located w Lh1n the odundaries of the Planned Comawnlty, except said signs shall not be located on perimeter streets to the Planned Consounity. "l. This section shall not be construed as to prohibit the developers within a Planned Comm pity from participating in the off-site subdivision sign program implemented and +nstailed through Che 9uitding Industry Association (3fA) provided that a combination of a maz irrum of six sic ns may be used to lead custcmers to the sic<, CITY OF PLANNING D1~'LS[ON i~l ~(M C}i ITEM TIT E.tiHtBIT SC:,>LE _ ;, ~ `-18 f. "8. Sfgns shall be no larger than s!xty inches by ten inches and shall be grouped an a four-sided sign structure as snorm in Exhibit "A'. The to header board shalt identify the planned common ty. ~_ . '~ ` TERRA VISTA=-'=''~ j rA PLANNED COMMUNITr-: PARKVIEW PLACE I{~ APARTMENTS I 71 "'`APARTMENTS -I~I1 I =_r _~ ,~ CITY OF rrE~t: R~K~ CLG~~IC-~,G?~ Tm.>r: Rw~I/~I~ '~4~ f'LAIr".YCVG DIVISION EXH161T:..~_ SCAIE y ,, ayq 15.15.060 Cse o.` fiats. ?he use o: Gags is permitted is conjunction with an aporoved residential subdivision sales office or a ccmmerciai c Fite, o: an i..^.custri al leasing office. ^.`.e ase of suc^. `__zcs s::all confo r:n to toe .follewinc _re.is :cns: A. A maximum of six may be used. H. The f'_ags shall to no Mahe: tr.an Fifteen feet. C. The _`laas shall be displayed in the vr~r:ediate 0. _^ the case o_ a r. <.... .__ia i~"subaivision of`:ce, the flats can be m - .: as iong~as a valid eperaticc pe r:r.lt fnr - _, ffic e~has teen _ante3 2. - the case o° a co;nmercial o:fice, or :r.dc_tria_ leasice ocf:,ce, the flats aay to ma_ntazned u..___ se': e^tq- five ercent of the soacea avc ~<en F .._ nax.a,am sze 'he .:ac's.:^.aii net exce_c ,...____ et - :.._ 'eet and sh al'`'to -a.^tsined !^ cpcd cc r,c a>- . .orn cr ~., r^ _`laas sha:. be reciaced. IGrd. 65-9 5:.6, .... 31. /.~ / ~: ~'~ (.I 1 1 lJi' RAi'V(,'f IO CL'C-1 ~ K}:~G~1 f'LANIVLrVG Df~'ISIO(r ~~1: TI"fl.E ~ EJCHIBIT ~. SCALE a~ '!H~ 4W~N~1ecW~.~ V-~~~ VICTOP.IA OFF-SITE DIRECTIONAL SZGN PROGRAM (6/23/97y ~ _____=====mn~:........~____====_z__________________ate= SIGN GROVES NUMBER COVNTRY GARDENS MEADOWS MODEL ~ TOVR _____________________ ___________~~__====~ea~==:_~=_==_m..== 1 1 1 1 1 r 2 1 1 I 1 3 1 1 1 1 4 I 1 1 1 5 I 1 1 1 6 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 1 8 0 0 0 1 9 1 1 1 O 10 0 0 0 1 (A} II 0 0 0 1 (B} l; 1 1 1 0 12 0 0 0 1 13 3 1 1 0 14 0 0 0 1 15 1 1 1 0 r 16 1 1 3 0 17 1 I 1 O 18 1 3 1 1 r 19 1 1 1 0 ZO 3 1 1 O 21 1 1 1 1 r ______________________________________________________ TOTAL '12 15 15 i5 14 RESOLUTION N0. g7_16G A RESOLUTION OF THE RAKC HO CUCANONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO TITLE 14 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO SIGNS WHEREAS, on the 26th day of August, 1987, the Planning Commissio held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Ptanning Commission has found that this pro,7ec'~wiTT-not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration, on August 26, 1981. NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED. 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Ptanning Commi scion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt the attached Ordinance amending Title 14 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. 2. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Conmission shall be forwa reed to tr..a City Council. APPRO YED AND ADOPTEG THIS 26ir uAY OF AUGUST. 1987. PLANNING COMMISSI OtI Of THE CITY OF RANG dO C'C.4MOhGA arr'v ~: TNiT~ iairman ATTEST: `~~.~~~__ ~/~~~TT~Y, ~ p~U~SCC r~ dry I, P~rad 6ul ler, peputy Secretary of to r. Ptanning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duty and regularly in roduced, passed, anA adopted oy the Planning Commission of the r i ~-t`-Y nr ~;ar n~ ~„~ mp.^.g3 at yul ar 22`iny- of tha Ptdnn°ny OinmmiSiian held on the 26tH Gay of~August, 1987, by the Following vote-to-wf t: AYES: COMI-0I SSI ON ER S: _; ;C1, ,,,,~~;ESL EY, `'. C.:I EL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: :. ;TiC ABSENT: COMM[SSI ON FRS: 'J LST01 as2 ORDINANCE N0. 309-A AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 14 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO SIGNS fie City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Section 14.20.065, of Chapter 14.20, of Title 18, of the Rancho Cucaaonga Runicipal Lode is hercDy repealed and re-enacted to read, in words and figures, as follows: w n any p anne community, which was-established pursuant to 17.14.020, subject to the provisions listed: "A. The developer of a planned cammun/ty shall suDmlt a sign Drogram for leading customers to the site within the planned ceawunity to the Planning Coawisslon for rcvtew and approval. Said program shall include the detailed design and piaceaw:nt of each sign structure. Signs shall be looted within the boundaries of the Planned Community, except said signs shall not be iota*.ed on perimeter streets to the Dlanned Community. tl. » gns snail oe no larger than sixty inches by ten inches and shah be grouped on a four-sided sign structure as shown 1n ExhlDit "A". The top header board shall identify the planned community. Further, each sign may only contain the name of the subdivision, and a directional arrow as shown On ExM Dit "A', except as otherwise provided for herein. "C. Signs placed on Drivate property shall be done with wrlttan consent of the property owner and filed with the Department of Community Development prior to issuance of penatt. Signs in the puD11c right-of- way shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of the sign Denatt. "D. There shall De no additions, tag signs, streaaw:rs, devices, display boards, or appurtenances added to the sign as originally approved. Further, no other directional signing may De used such as p,sters, sandwich signs, or troller signs. a~3 ~ _~ ORDINANCE N0. 309-A Page 2 "E. All non-conforwing subdivision directional signs associated with the subdivision to question lust De revved prior to the issuance of a new sign penait. 'F. qfive-hundred-doilar cash deposit shalt De placed with the City to ensure caeplimce with this title. My sign placed contrary to the provisions of this title aµy be revoved by the City and the cost of reapval shall De deducted fro~a the deposit. Addlttoml costs Incurred by the City resulting frame the rsoval of illegal signs shall be charged to the developer. "G. The sign shall be allowed unL11 subdivision 1s sold out or, in the case of leasing efflce, until 90 percent of the units have bean leased or rooted. 'H. Th/s section snail not De construed as to prohibit the developers within a P/anmd Coaaaunity frae participating in the off-site subd1v1s1an sign progran tagleaented and installed through the Building Industrial Association (BIA). 'I. 51gns any also De used to lead people to non- caaeierctai caaeamtty facilities, such as parks and public schools. ow .IC"ri Z. inia Cuuncii Hereby linos one cert7tie5 that the protect has been r v ewe n capliance with the California Enviromental Quality Act of 1910 and Hereby concurs with that Negative Declaration pasted with respect to the protect. shall cause T-tTie sane toebe published M Loin fifteenn(15) days aftertltslark passage at (east once in The Oa11y Report, a newspaper of general circulation published 1n the City of n ar o, a rota, and circulated Sn the Ctty of Rancho Cuuannga, California asV ~ ,~ .~ E`CHIBIT A SHADOW RUN ~ ~, CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~ica,tray ,`r'te-~ 9 ~' ~,. <, ar z" yi' ~ c z D ~'z _ '> -°-_"__ i DATE: October 7, 1987 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND YICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN - reques o c ange a an use an zon ng es gna ions from Medium (4-14 dwelling units per acre) and Medium-High (14-24 dwelling units per acre) Residential to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) fora 24.67 acre parcel within the 4tctoria Planned Community, located at the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Milliken Avenue - APN: 202-211-13 and 14. I. RECgMENDATION: The Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal an as unammously recommended denial of the land use change as inconsistent with the goals and objectives of the Victoria Community Plan and General Plan, If, after receiving all input and testimony ine Ci Ly Cuuntii wuw,o ni Lii Lila i2C~nTn,2ndatiJfS Gf ~~.. Planning Commission, denial of the request would be appropriate.y II. BACKGROUND: On September 9, 1987 the Planning Commission conducted as pubTicTearing to consider a change in the land use designation from Medium and Medium-High Residential to Low-Medium Residential fora 24.67 acre parcel located at the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Milliken Avenue. The applicant was requesting the change to accommodate the development of a 120 lot subdivision at a density of 4.86 dwelling units Der acre. After receiving all public input and testimony, the Planning Commission unanimously denied the request. III. ANALYSIS: In recommending denial of the proposed land use change, e arming Commission stated the following: A. Variation of Unit Types: The objectives of both the General 1sTan an e c or a ommunity Plan are to provide a variation i in unit types to serve all incomes and lifestyles within the City. In order to accomplish these objectives, a variation of the densities is necessary. By deleting the hfyner densities, opportunities would be lost Ld provide the diversity of housing needed to serve all portions of the population. The as(, CITY COONCIL STAFF REPORT VC PA 87-02 - M1111am Lyon Company October 7, 1987 Page 2 development of all single family detached homes within the Groves Village would exclude a portion of the population from the opportunity to purchase a unit fitting their income or lifestyle. The variation in unit types was also necessary to create a balance within the community and the City as a whole. In order to accomplish this goal, the current mix of densities should be maintained. Location: The location of the site is suited for multi-family eve opment. fie elementary school and neighborhood park located southwest of the site afford recreational and educational facilities in close proximity to the development. The site would also be located across the street from a commercial center thereby providing community services and a transition of density from Camnercial to Multi-Family to Single Family. C. Market Demand: Nith the development of additional single am y e ac a tracts, the demand for this product type would eventually decrease thereby allowing the development of alternative housing types. D. future Changes: Concern was expressed that by allowing the cTiange from~edium and Mediwn-High to Low-Medium Residential, a precedent would be established which would lead to future changes of the land use deli anati nne in nYhar arnac ni the Victoria Planned Community. As a result, the objectives of the General Plan and Victoria Planned Commmity to provide variation of unit types would be further endangered. A detailed staff analysis is contained in the attached Commission staff report. Res lly submitted, ra r City P nn 8B: Sf~ vc Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report Exhibit "8" - Planning Commission Minutes Exhibit "C" - Planning Comm~isston Resolution Recommending Denial Resolution Denying the Land Use Change asp - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~c~MO, STAFF REPORT ~~~' ~(~~\~^= DATE: September 9, 1987 rurr T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMAUNITY PLAN L reques c ange an use an zoning es gna ions from Medium (4-14 dwelling units per acre) and Medium-High (14-24 dwelling units per acre) Residential to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) fora 24.67 acre parcel within the Victoria Planned Community, located at the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Milliken Avenue - APN: 202-211-13 and 14. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a Community Plan Amendment to 1 c anyTi -e -ter- Tand-use desiynation from Medium and Medium-High Residential to Low-Medium Residential and issuanra nv a neya live uec Tara2ion. B. Project Density: The proposed amendment rill chdnye the ensi~'ty range rom 4-14 and 14-24 dwelling units per acre to 4- 8 dwelling units per acre. C. Surroundin Land Use and Zonir ot~rt tl•-- ~'acan i age omnercial South - Single family residential; Medium Residential (4-14 dwelling units per acre) East - Yaca nt; Medium Residential (4-14 dwelling units per acre ) Nest - Yacant, proposed single family residential; Medium Residential (4-14 dwelling units per acrei ,.. ~er~e rai Pian Desi nations: ro,lec~Site - e rum- rg Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and elementary school North - Neighborhood Commercial SOIL Ch - PdrK a5g 1TEw c PLANNING CGMAI SSIC TAFF REPORT YCPA 87-02 - Nilliam Lyon Company September 9, 1987 Page 2 East - Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) West - Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) E. Site Characteristics: The site is currently vacant with an average s ope o - from north to south. The site is bounded on the north by Kenyon Way, on the south by Victoria Park Lane, on the east by Milliken Avenue, and on the west by Fairmont Way. II. ANALYSIS: A. Background: On March 11, 1987, the applicant submitted a en'f~at"1-ve~ract map on this site for the development of 306 condominium units at a density of 12.4 dwe111ng units per acre. The proposal had gone through the design review process and had been scheduled far the June 4, 1987 Planning Commission meeting until it was withdrawn by the applicant based upon an insufficient market demand for the product type. B. General: The applicant fs proposing to change the land use es'd-igna~ion iron Medium and Medium-Nigh Residential to Low- Medium RPSi dPntial to arrnmmnAatn Yho do del n..m~n• s '20 1Dt single family subdivision. The proposed subdivision is made up of lots averaging 6,712 square feet in area and a density of 4.86 dwelling units per acre. The current land use designations of Medium and Medium-High Residential Districts specify a density range of between 4-14 and 14-24 dwe111ng units per acre. The request to modify the density range and lower the dwelling units per acre must be reviewed for consistency with the Victoria Community Plan. C. Variation in Unit Type: Within the Victoria Planned Community, one o e goo s an purposes is to provide a variety of housing types to serve the needs of the growing community. IAo re specifically, the Victoria Community Plan states that residential land within the Victoria Groves Village wilt include bath attacl-~ed and detached residences. The plan identifies Lhe type of housing products allowed based on a specific density range. For example, the Low-Medium density would permit single family attached and detached units on tots ranging from 3,000.7,200 square feet in area. Medium density would permit single family homes including duplexes, 4-plexes, condominiums, and townhomes. Medium-High density would permit multi-family homes with common open space. as9 PLANNING COMMI SSIC TAFf REPORT VCPA 87-02 - Nilliam Lyon Company September 9, 1987 Page 3 To date, development in the Groves Village has proceeded in the following manner; TRACT N0. LOT SIZE PRODUCT TYPE 13022 East 3,000 S. F. Single Family Detached - Zero Lot Ltne 13022 West 4,500 S.f. Single Family Detached - Center Plot 13057 4,000 S. F. Single Family Detached - Center Plot 13058 3,000 S. F. Single Family Detached - Zero Lot Line 13059 5,000 S. F. Single Family Detached - Center Plot 13060 7,200 S. F. Single Family Detached - Center Plot The projects approved for the Groves Vfllage do provide some variety of architectural styles, unit sizes, and lot sizes to serve a range of the market demand. There is, however, one common element that is characteristic of all the projects is that they are all stogie family detached homes. There are no approved projects within the Groves that offer an attached Hilo of i1M1 nn Au..l .... -t- ~ ---- , _•-•,-. „-r,.n, i-p~a.n, CJi~d4niiu iulll ur iA1w1111U111e. D. Location: The Victoria Community plan states that higher rest en lal densities will be near the regional center or near the intersections of major arterials. Also, the Plan states that lower density resf dential areas will be provided farther from the regionai center or along the community edges. While the Groves Village is the farthest village from the regional center, the project site is located along a major arterial, Milliken Avenue. In addition, the site is just south of Highland Avenue and the future Foothill Freeway and north of Base Line Road. Staff feels that the location does meet the criteria in the Community Plan to provide higher residential densities. p"asl^ 1.^. the Y~ctoria "cmar3nity plan, it was anticipated na in the short term, demand for single faintly detached dwelling units would outpace the demand for attached multi- family units. Therefore, the Low and Low-Medium land uses would be developed first with the higher density areas developed in the future. The Community plan rea~u zed that the higher density parcels might remain vacant until some future date. The development of Victoria to this point reflects that d~ 0 PLANNING COMMIS516 SAFF REPORT VCPA 87-02 - Wiiltam Lyon Company September 9, 1987 Page 4 trend. The majority of development that has taken place within the Planned Community has occured within the Low and Low-Medium density land use designations both in the Windrows and in the Groves. To date, no condomi ntum, townhome or apartments have been approved within Victoria. The development of this site, however, would provide sane benefit to the Groves Village. It would create a more aesthetically pleasing streetscene along Milliken Avenue. It would aiso complete the residential development within the Groves Village and provide more continuity throughout. Flexibility of the Plan: One of the unique elements of the Q c or a ommun y an is the flexibility built into the overall development of the Planned Community area. Political, economic, or marketing conditions may arise that suggest rearrangement of the land use designations. The Camaunity Plan allows the trading of residential densities to one planning area for densities in another planning area. Also, the densities within a planning area can be decreased without a corresponding increase fn another planning area. Such is the case with the current proposal. The applicant is proposing the latter and would like Co decrease the denst ty wl thin this site in response to the current market demand for single family detached homes. However, the flexibility of the densities within the Planned Community should only 6e accomplished when ft is found to be consistent with the goals and intent of the Community Plan for each village and the Planned Community as a whole. Victoria was intended to have a variety of housing opportunities. This variety can only be achieved by maintaining a broad range of residential densities. [f the proposed land use change from Medium and Medium-High to Low-Medium is adopted, there will be no further opportunities for attached mul tT -family development within the Groves Village. The entire village will be single family detached units. G. Compatibility: Nitn the approval of the area development plan or ineyar s orth, Medium density was established on the east side of iilliken Avenue apposite the subject site. This wai done to provide some similarity in the streetscene on both sides of Milliken Avenue. With the change Tn density, the streetscene will be somewhat altered. This change, however, is less obvious due to the width of Milliken Avenue. acs i PLANNING COMMISSIL TAFF REPORT VC PA 87-02 - William Lyon Company September 9, 1987 Page 5 Traffic: With the proposed change in density the traffic generated from the site will decrease. In fact, the daily trips anticipated will be a little less than one-half the number of trips from a multi-family project. For example, a 120 single family lot subdivision would generate approximately 1,200 trips per day. A nul tT -family project of 306 units (the previous proposal), on the other hand, would produce roughly 2,142 trips per 4ay. I. Future Development: Ni th the proposal to lower the density on sfFi sil:e, si-afi~l s concerned that additional requests may follow to reduce the densities in other planning areas. If the Planning Commission does feel that the changes are appropriate for this site, staff recommends that the Planning Commission establish whether the change is due to specific conditions applicable to the site or whether the change is precedent setting which would allow changes in other villages. J. Environmental Assessment: As a result of the Initial Study and e nv ronmen a ec ist, staff has determined that the proposed change will not have a significant impact on the environment. Therefore, should there be Commission support for the Amendment, staff recommends that the Planning Commission issue a Negative Declaration. III re~rr rnn r. runr ur o.. -dCr f:.r ahC nl •_-~i~- __ _ approve a an use change,u the Planning Commission must determine that there are adequate facts to support the following findings: 1. That the Amendment will provide for development of a comprehensively planned urban comnu Wily within the district that is superior to development otherwise allowable under alternative regulations; and 2. That the Amendment will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth management policies of the City; and 3. chat the Amendment will provide for the construction, improvement, or exte.^s'.er. of transportation facilities, public utilities, and public services required by the development with the district. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in e a y eport newspaper and notices were sent to ail property owners w n eet of the site. a~a PLANNING COMMISSIO, .TAPE REPORT VEPA 87-02 - W1111am Lyon Company September 9, 1987 Page 6 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission con u~cf a pu7iTic hearing to review the proposed Nmen6nent and receive pubiic input. If, after receiving all the input, the Commission feels there are adequate facts to support the findings, then a recommendation of approval to the City Council and an issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. If the Planning Commission feels there are not adequate facts to support the findings, recommendation of denial to the City Council would be appropriate. Res`peetfully submitted, ,/ //~~~ •r Brad-BUl'S~r City -1anner BB:SM:vc Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Existing Land Use Exhibit "B" - Proposed LanC 'se Exhibit "C" - Area Developr.:~ a P1 an for Grove Village Exhibit "D" - Original Yictoria Land Use Designations Resolutfon of Approval ocggtnrt nn of noniai 2 (p 3 BSdO ARC eIBAID, SUITE 8, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91730 (71d1 980-42nd August Jn, :987 Mr. Arad Buller Plannin_e :hector City of F echo Cucaxnga P.0. Box cu7 F ancho Cucamonga, CA 91770 P RG]ECT: Victoria Groves S UB EC T: Ten:acive :'r act l7)2? Dear 5:ad: ! apprec := a you and Scott meeting w th us to discuss the subject tract. As I mencionzc during our mee:in3, we fe~l the proposed tract is both compatible and cousiscen[ Ma h thz inter: of the Victoria Common icv Plan for the t ollo'::nt reasons: I. Development of V: u.o ria G: )vrs to date well rep:e5ents implementation .. ere c: :ho r. ., imoo:can; concepts of '. he Vlc co na Communic': Plan, :he or. m',.n 1'a l'u ncept. _. -: ac: 17.-.? rc-r :rues :he u: :l:zat:on of :his planning aoprea,!: -':`v~d:ng C•.+ell:ng un:a nt a ;t'pe anC ~n a qudnr:ty aCCress: r.g al! nt .,r .ollow': n, tler.c r.:s o. ;he ~`p r.imum 1'te ld Concepe: a' i'e'v is:en of amen ups dzs<r:bed in the Community Plan. ~o:c: '. ic:cria Grp von torte ^.;:v prov:ces a completed b ac;.~ nei;, h'no rhnnd park. i,17 a: rot of Vl cr prig Park Lane whirh ::ac: wool: coop is u• and h.ii acres of ~mmuniey Trails eomple:c ';r Und@r lOnsCrJCt+Cn. ,. o.ov: =,: o:'. of ;he :nfras; ructum nr'e deC. \ote' Ce^.t ur .... d:•veionm~>n; o! 'hi:. „,-o~., 'rcll:ken ny'e. will be extended f: o.^. . .rtor,a r^^a,-k La n•' tc Iii ghland a~-!: („ii width strv~~t :-or ~v~^.^" .,~~,: :'t~nv:•n 'dac will be const ratted wfch full wid:h ... ,.. ..<..,. .ts (: ..,, Fairmont to ..il Lken. '. ompic;:on of ;F.is parcel in the Groves Village with :;} a'ten da ra .of ra s; roc ::: re will complete all residential tl~r.:lupn.e n: [ne rat:v sien:f :cart, ly enhancing the qua l:ty of lift r;r ail t. ~oria f, rovos residents. Additional impetus :o devvlt ~e n: e' [he v:llaee comme rc :al center rill be ano:har ix>nef tt of romplec:on and ucc upanv of ;his final resider nal pa rc cl .n '. ,. ~,- a Lru vvs• REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT ~b4 i d Prov:v cn of Names cna: nae: "che demands of :he ho us!n_ ma eke c'. Thts G ~[e t:os [he '+iC er[a Comma.n::y~ Plan a in:eg rai and vita: to .he ~'p; .^.u^. ': ie U. i...,,_apc anC exac u:: on of che ::om.^..un i:c Pi ar. a= a ..,r .r. -ova iopxenz of t;e r.:a ~"roves to dace, and Trac: 137?_ has Seen de s: geed co "p: nv;dc er.cugh units of housing :o assure housing needs can be met fmm Iota] emp lcyomenr grew;h ar prices local lv erple•.~ed w~crae:c cav aEiard". The o:o iec cs eurreicl~ ac: ive V:ccona G: oyes e ter a I-•id~ anee r; s:ng'-~ fan: Ly home-ox•v ::^..~ ogao r[un c:•as. „vaitaol: a:e zero-ioc-i:m• homes on )Gig square foo[ Io;s ft'*rnr app: ex:na[i!e ~iJ ..=Gua:e feet ,.:ch p: ices beg: nn ing in _.. SS;AGL"s ;e ccnve n::ona; ]arge single fam.i:v homes «:ch uo .~ app rexima[e!l' 7:OJ sGua rz fee: ei :acing a: va on tots averaging ove: dvo0 square feet :n size p .cod ~r! the 516G.900'>. '. se of ne :. he: c.^,e nax: hum nor m:n:mun number e: dmi-!!in u::: c; Eer ant ive^, .aaL use .. ~: he ...eves .:1!age as e N'hci~. ...~.. ~. ... .~ .. ~. -'~p'. .:or. :t .hc prop. s.:d 'C: ac: 2?. .~'. r -.. .. .: .: n .., ,.. -' ~~ ~. . 1" : ,, a. ., n... 1 .. 3~rr~ i ",i; . aes %~i' N'I1,L1.1~1 L1Y)\ ~~rai ~iiro~ 5'eu will see ;ha: while ehe [cal :es ident ial ace ragr a close 75..)5 vs. IS».8~ chat [he D.Z.. AC. varies by apo:ex: natelc : D. U. 'nc. feel very s. rong:v [hat :he Communicv ?tan did ncc adequa xlc address the consrde cable impa:c of the ,z: s: in.; opagraphy aad :eGui red grading design on }~ie ld. fr P: ovides :he oppo rcunicy :o complete ail residential devulopnen[ in Vic eo: is Crovcs accemodanng curre~: "pol i[ical, eccm;n:c and ma rket inq conditions wi [nouc de c: imen cal ly of feccJng the aa: l: cc :o con s: rust the coal Vicroria Ccmmun:cv". The l'u :oria Community still offers many cpporram vies tnr at tamed and nui: i-f a^~iic housing tr. P:eco: is V:neva rds and nose app ropriatq lc :n '.. e[cria Laves .:t'r. :he p:ax:n,:y of V;c~_or is Lakes Park, t'iccor is Ga rd=_ns 3e g:enal Cee:er and ch,~ ad jacenr Regions: &ela'. ed reca:l acd comme ccial de velopnent. ...t app: cued llcto:: Groves :1 raa Oeceloprent Plan changed :he l~.~d use far The proposed .: ac: i~om R:ti :o }1. ldhen r-hu fmm~nn:rv Plan vq< adco[ed rnr t i,.x:b:: icv :o range one eensi n' Ce.=.:gna:ion was boil[-in. :u: the r, the da:: n:: cr ~f .I xas ~-ice U. P.'AC. Only rec ent lv was [he p. de: in: vier. cha ngcd ;, „ ,,-_Ir., Tn:s :s :he F.: s[ tine that change has raised a quest: en ~~f ~. ,... ':':h ;ho .;c-:nur.tty Pian. i ac. ..r. ~. .. .~ ,rout:;] aasod ,n the adept ed dFf:ni n ons uciliz~,d. : .. .., n - ., ...; ~ ..,._ ., ~. .:... '.J... is a.l . ...:a:. _- _. -. ~ .... ... ~cr:a. -.. d:san as ,vY: _,od :esen; s ehe oe s' , . .. .. ., ,,., ,u.:w .. ror:a ., da'r. :.~ r.~. Fl ors pr. pos.: -". ~s ,,", ~~ -.-_:. Ian. 'or '::,. an:: .p., ,f .., .`.: „rove. ~ ...' ~... .. _~~~~ .. ~.. ~, .~~~ Jt a_.,...,dd ~. ~I ~~~~ .:.. `.~~••. ••{a ~~IICLl91 t4 :'i.ln as a['~Op .. 'ed a~~ 71-4 ~s~ '/, OOD S.F /ors 7~ ~/~~' _ k i ~ i ..A ~~~~~~~ "aw,. ~~'.~.~. A ~/3os9 ~ ,"° ~ M J ~i 4flOVES ~ i ~ ~~;~ ~,. , ~ iii,. `.lr nr~l }Adt ,~ inn < - ``~ ~ifV V~v -,w , ~,~ _~~~ _. ~~_ e n :-..~ __.._~.~._- ~'E~GrE,.e fur PI ..\\\ItiC~ IH\'LSKX\' ~~ 7.~'~rf /301z F~~- 3 arc sf- ~kT i~~n z~r' S6` .=tom' CE.~j~,~ ~-~T a 1HT1 i rrl:~l, yC~ ~7:~ _ T1TI1 ~X~N~e ~4.v1S .'<S_4~_,. L\I IIIgT ~ _ ~(.\I 1. _ .. a~~ ~j 3as~ cE~jE~ ~T ~'> /,~sB 3,2'?~ sF to ~~~1~/NE 7~ ~ ,,,~-. iii _~±= ~ ~T~ -__.~ M ~~~sq S,a~ s~ ors «l~iP }~T ~ 8 `~ ~ ,, ~~ I iii ,~ .~ ~ ,. ~I. -.. .J ~' r.arr ~`~ ~ II was M ~' I \ I I / ~, 1~ III VIII Imo. ..~.. ~ - - ~ :n ~. T,pst"r i~a F~l \ 3,CJ~ sc <qs ~cti3o~d 7, ~vo s~ fv~s S!S~ sf'[ojs ~>k'nI ~~r~,~'f-Y°l IZ:1`~~~)Cl.~:,~1~~~~r.~ TITII -,f'~'~.I'2Sr'd G4'~!~? f~ I'I.:\\\11(. IN\'ISND\ LXIIIRIl'_~_._5(.v.l. __ a~$ / \ ,, ~ v ~. wuf mono'. anw ` IAND USE LEGEND ANO .~ , Y. ~• ~ ~ '~w UNR TABULATN)N ' LM.y ,,„a-- ~~-• . _ °'. ~ r l Y' v ~ ' z -''-•l~~ ~~ '~ ~i v ~ .. ~ 4 PHASE 1 / ~ MASE v /''~ fir :I L _ ~ ~~ ~ x~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~ M ` ~< ~~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ .~....- ,~ .......... ~ ~ ....... .. L ... nM r~ ~ .. ~ .fc. \l 1{t~ I I ~Z.~~~f~)(~1~:~~1~)~~n1 TITLI:~.~/ES~l,PEi/~t~.(,.~ .. PL,\1\'I~X~ IN\'I5NX~ l.SIIIRII C __x..V.l a~a IIIGIN4M0 NEHUE I y L L ~: M • 'i f. 1: i 4 L. ~~ '.:.:.... LM L..... } LM J .~' .bli:. ..r.. ...•:... ~ :~ '•+t ~L .~ M S LM ,~ ~,T ffjj M 'i% MN ~ LM I M a M E LM • ,Wt lM (( nt GPM pq .~ ' ~` L 1~,,~plrtY y'~~, pKWq !J~ y M "~ ,1 { s LM ~ LM ~ LM r.nn ..,. ,f u ~ ~ ~'~J~~v M ~p LM 1~ Lt -~ ~ ` ,.rt f... ,~~ ~ .. ..... J.r.~....../ > L ......~.. ~~ ..P' .. M .~! ( ,r,::+; 4:1:x; ~ t ~'~ L W~ ,~ ~r ~ v., M 1V 4, LM /~ 4~4~1~~`` MN ' . // 8if t !!!))) ~ ''~ tlAYL'nE WND ~( NtTI i C'I"1'1' (~~ R:~~'EK) CL'(:1~K):~(:A PL,~\'\l~(~ I~\'LSI(X~ IT[[.\L _ v~~7cZ _ ago G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO VICTORIA COt9AUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 87-02 WICCr~fA O - reques o mange a an use an zoning d°signatio~om Medium i4-14 dwelling units per acre) and Pkdium- Hiih i14-24 dwe7 ling units per acre) Residential to Low-Medium lteraential t4-8 dwelling units per acre) for a 24.67 acre parcel within the `lic to ria Planned Community, located at the northwest corner df Yicto ria Park Lane and Milliken Avenue - qPN 202-211-13 and 14. Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Mc Niel opened the public hearing. Mr. Stephen Ford, representative of the Nilliam Lyon Company, sta teu the staff's concern seems to ue whether or not this project addresses the intent of the plan. One of the intents of the community plan is to provide a variety of housing in the Groves Village. Victoria Groves, to date, has not only met the provisions of the original community plan, it has exceeded it and the amount of common open space dedicated to the public for their use. This particular tract that would be involved in the pion change amendment would finish a large portion of Milliken Avenue from Victoria Park to Highland which is a very important piece of infrastructure. The other portion of the intended community plan is the provision of homes that meet "the demand of the housing market". They feel this is a very integral and vital portion of the intent of the community plan and this proposal on this site does meet the intent, it ~neets the deina nds of fire housing market. They have a strong desire to complete the Groves Village as quickly as possible, at least the residential development. The proposal is consistent with the intent of You rnmmdni h~ nlan nd ch hhn Dla rnmmie ,M ati ,... a romm nnann e, ..n ~. +n. ~mm. of approval to City Council. Cnai rman Mc Niel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Emerick stated he supported staff's recommendation [o keep mu7 tiple family in place. Commissioner Tolstoy stated one of the features of Victoria is the different deg reel of density providing housing affordable to people wr, °.tng in the inuustrtal area. C ;.nmi „ inner 3l aeesley stated this is an excellent location for the ni ,r.t ;ensi ty and ne finds ne compel ling reason to support the change. .,~.~~..i•ri•~r '.ni !.inn fcit that i3l onto wag t,nn 'v, oy war^_. :t i~npo~.~rt to re to in some di versi Cy to create neighborhoods that are well .cal anc ad. Sne flit coat the coca ti on in addition to the coinmerci al to Cie nortn is very well designed the way it is. ~1 ;nn r~~j ~,omnis;i ;r. I4iwtes -.- Septdmber 09, i98' a~~ Chairman Mc Niel stated he concurs with the comments, Chairman Mc Niel opened the pu'olic hearing. Mr. Ford stated there was a sli gnt misconception t'nat a condoini nium or a townhouse project odilt on this site would be more affordable than ^^te family that currently exists in The Groves. Townhouses or condominiums cannot be uuilt to be competitively priced in the Rancho Cucamonga area. This will continua to exist based on what is happeniny not only in Rancho Cucamonga but wnat is happening in otner areas outside the city. Commissioner Emerick moved to deny the request to change the land use designation from Medium and Medium-High Residential to Low-Medium Residential located at the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Milliken Avenue. Commissioner Chi ti ea seconded the motion. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COhMISSIONERS: EMERI CK, CHITIEA, BLAKESLEY, MC NIEL, TOLSTUY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NUNE ABSENT: COPtMi55[UNERS: NONE It was clarified the season for denial was the finding it was inconsistent with the 3oals and intent of tiie Yicto ria Plan and Lna gaols of the General Plan. * # * * f k -carrieJ ~~~ Planning Commission .li nu tes -Z- Septe~,n:wer u9, :3d7 RESOLUTION N0. 07-160 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 81-02, REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM TIEDIUM AND MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL TO LON-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL LOCATED AT TH£ NORTHNEST CORNER OF VICTORIA PARK LANE AND MILL IKEN AVENUE - APN: 202-211-13 and 14. A. Recitals. ,;~ -., .~. .•.. ~~,,. '.:~p.:.~~ .`.. filed ..., .,,r ~. ;,...:~~„ Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 87-02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Community Plan Amendment request is referred to as "the application". (ii) On September 9, 1987, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application am concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOM, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This I.Omm15510n hP rehV CDPfif{rally finwe ~h of all n_F Mn ia._~_._ set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on September 9, 1987, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Milliken Avenue with a street frontage of 1183.21 feet along Milliken Avenue and lot depth of 732 feet and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the~norih is zoned for commercial uses and is currently vacant, The property to the south, east, and west is zoned for ~zsdentiai uses. fie property ra the east and west !s presently vacant. The property to the south is being developed with single family residences. (c) That one of the elements that makes the Planned Community superior to other development is Lhe variation in residential housing types within each village and the Planned Community as a whole. The amendment will not provide for the development of attached multf-family units as was originally provided for in the Community Plan thereby el imf na tf ng variation in the unit type within the Groves Village. a~3 PLANNING CONWI 7N RESOLUTION N0. VCPA 87-02 - M'.. ,iam Lyon Co. September 9, 1987 Page 2 (d) An objective of the General Plan is to allow and create nex oppportu nits es which enable a broad range of housing types, site designs, construe<ion methods, and maintain a balanced supply of ownership and rental units, with the proposed change in density, the opportunity to devet op attached multi-family units will not be possible within Grove Village and will be reduced within the Victoria Planned Community. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission duriny the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this f.ommicsidn hnrohi finds aon concludes as follows: (a) That the Nnendment will not provide for development of a comprehensively planned urban community within the District that is superior to development otherwise allowable under alternate regulations, (b) That the Amendment will not provide for development within the District in a manner consistent Mith the General Pian and with related development and growth v management policies of the City; and 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1910 and, further, Lhis Commission hereby recomaends issuance of a Negative Declaration. ~. Gased upon cne rindings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows: ia) That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends denial on the 9th day of September, 1987, Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 87-02. (b) The Planning Comm scion hereby recommends that the City Council deny Victoria Community Plan Miendment No. 87-02. (c) That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related macer;al hereby adopted by the Planning Camnissidn snail De forwarded to the City Council, o, The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. a~~ DLANNING COMMI ON RESOLUTION N0. VCPA 87-02 - Wi, iiam Lyan Co. September 9, 1987 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, ;987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -'- 1. ," I arry airman ATTEST: ra y eceay I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Loawissi on of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of September, 1987, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: CONMI$$(ONERS: ENERICK,BLAKES LE V, CNITIEA, M[NIEL, tOLSTOY ~ NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ~1~ RESOLUTION N0. U,~S~9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING VICTORIA COiMAUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 87-02, REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS FROM MEDIUM (4-14 DWELLING UNITS DER ACRE) AND MEDIUM-HIGH (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) RESIDENTIAL TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR A 24.67 ACRE PARCEL NITHIN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED AT THE NORTHNEST CORNER OF VICTORIF PARK LANE AND MILLIKEN AVENUE - APN: 202-211-13 WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Victoria Community Plan Amendment un, C7 ,... SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council makes the following findings: A. That the Amendment will not provide for development of a comprehensively planned urban community within the District that is superior to development otherwise allowable under alternate regulations. B. That the Amendment will not provide for development within the District in a manner consistent with the General Plan and wf th related development and growth management policies of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council does hereby deny Yic toria Community Plan Pmendment No. 87-02. a~~ ---- CITY OF RANCHO CI;CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Oct Rher 7, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy gcosta, Junior Engineerfng Bide ~~' . SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 6 FOR DR 87-01 LOCATED AT 11288 ARROW ROUTE TO LANDSCAPE MIINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 RECO!lE11011T10N: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached rac nt ptinn ^-d-e rind :ratA lii GOOilE bL1UA wlih Hnne xatl0n No. 6 LO Landscape Mai ntenance•~District No: 3 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROLN D/ANALYSIS gttathed for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 6 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 for OR 87-01 incat ed at 11288 Arrow Route. The developer of the subject development has been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively ennrn vaA by RccnLrtinn Nn R7-677 Res pectfu suhmi tted, R Attachments a~~ RESOLUTION N0. ~ 7 ' S5b A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMON G4 ORDERING THE NORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 6 TO IAN DSCAPE M4INTENAN CE UISTRI CT N0. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR pt 87-01 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 2nd day of September, 1987, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. B7-476 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 6 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, which Resolution of Intention No. 87-476 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of tM aacsar ov said .^;ec~c'.s`ioc of ' =ctlun, headea "Notice of improvement", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87-478, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucanon ga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and uia0~ici as i cyu i I cu uy i aw, as aphC Of a i I all iIIC 111 i IYaV I L UI 11a I 1 Illg UII I I I C 111 Che office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and doc anent ary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the coot enpl at ed work and the benefits to be derived Cher efr an and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said C~i ty Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of intention No. 87-478, be done and made; and `~°"Cil 2; De it fui thee' r'eiui ved Lila[ the repurl filed by the Engineer isy iT e~finally approved; and SECTION 3: 8e it further resolved that the assessments and method of assessment in t e Engineer's Report are hereby approved, SECTION 4: 8e it finally resolved that said assessments shall not 6e gin anti a ter 0 percent of said tracts have teen occupied. a~$ CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMDNGA Engineer's Report far Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 ANNEXATION N0. 6 For OR 81-01 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into landscape Maintenance District No. 3. The City Council has date~!ined t!r :ra;, to .~_ maintained will have a;~ effect u{iirn ail the developments as mentioned above. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed developments are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right-of-way or easements to be granted to tyre City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred by the District for parkway and median improvenent construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers and or/by the City. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (5.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is canprised of Parcel Map 7349, cane rised of 8 panels, totaling 6,051 square fret. The district was formed in October 5, 1993, for the maintenance of landscaping a detention basin and storm drain within the protect. This zone will be assessed on per lot basis for the maintenance costs within the protect boundary only as stipulated in the Engineer's Report for the formation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all other projects that are being annexed or will be annexed to this District. All lots or parcels within Zone 2 will be assessed on net acre basis for the maintenance of landscaped median islands on Haven Avenue from 4th Street to Deer Creek Channel, Foothill Boulevard and 4th Street from west to east City limit, Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue, from 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard, 6th Street from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue and median islands on other major divided highways and same parkways within the Industrial Specific Plan Area and Foothill Boulevard overlay area. The estimated cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 including Annexation No. 6 is as follows. Zone 1 Fv7;tt n,; uistrxt Total estimated maintenance cost E2,070 Assessment units ~ 8 Total cast - assessment unit for year and month EP~O_~ = Ez 58.75/year or EZ1.56/mo. Zone 2 Existing Annexation New District No. 6 Total Total estimated annual wai ni en mice area - Sy. F~. v ~ u Assessment units, acres 380,507.14 6.5 380,513.64 Tot a1 cost assessment unit for year and month ~0 x$. 30_ _ $ 0/year 0(mo. Assessment shall apD ly to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is at tacYied to tMS report and labeled "Exhibit A", by this reference the diaar am is hereby incorporated wi Ch in the text of this repurl. SECTIDN 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and Lhat assessment shall be equal for each parcel for Zone 1 and shall be equal to the nett acreage for each lot or oz~t;r' +n Zone 2. The City Council will hold a .: ~,y:r cay in June, to determine the actual assessments b?c^.d :;ca,, !irk a~caal1 costs incurred by the City during the pr e~ioe~°~;c,t ;_,.~ which are to be recovered through assessments as required a, tar Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts Dublic hearing, considers ail testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 6 (Zone 2) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3: PROPERTIES PROJECT ACREAGE DR 81-01 6.5 IMPROVEMENT AREAS TO BE ANNE%ED IN ANNE NATION N0. 1 Area Sq. Ft. Haven Avenue Foothill Boulevard Milliken Avenue 4th Street Rochester Avenue 6th Street ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. ,3 ANNEXATION N0.6 `s lTE ~<<,,,~ ~~ ~"'=, CITY OF RANCHO Cl,'CA,~I( ~~~/ ~' ~; -~ ~ eNCINEERINC DIVIS1oN `" VICINITY MAP im N ---- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 7, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH RNNEXATION N0. 31 FOR DR 87-01 LOCATED AT 11288 ARROW ROUTE TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND ANNEXATION N0. 4 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation Nos. 31 and 4 to Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, respectively, and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND/gNALYSIS Attached for City Council approval are resolutions ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 31 to Street Lighting Maintenance District ii u. i miJ nuuennLiuu ii u. + lu Sli eel Liyiiliny riai nirf~mrce Di~lr i~l nu. o for DR 81-O1, located at 11288 Arrow Route. The developer of the subJect development has been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolutions also approve the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 87-479 and 87-481. Res pec submitted, c RH .JA. Attachments MO RESOLUTION N0. ~7- S~j/ A RESOLUTI CN Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUGIMONCA p10ERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 31 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE OISTRI CT N0. 1 ANO ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR DR 87-01 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 2nd day of September, 1987, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 87-480 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 31 to Street Lighting Maintenance Oistrict No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 87-480 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by taw, as appears frgn the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons awning real Droperty proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87-480, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and ....d 1.u lw i..r.n !Fn ~GGiAv~{! ni 4.ili n iiln i ~YU: u~ .~iYY-~ri .. w.. ~..- i... ....... r -. ..... ~~ .. ..- ... t hen office-of the-City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and doc anent ary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contanplated work and the benefits to he derived they efr an and said City Cauncil having sox acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1; It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires Lhe annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the war k, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 81-480, be done and made; and i[rri~y i. me P=part tiles by t^= Engi^eer ,. hereby fina;!y approved; a~ SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's Report are hereby ap pra ve d. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent o' said tracts a e been occupied. '1 S~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. Annexation No. 31 for DR 87-01 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex the developments enumerated Tn Exhibit 'A" into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon DR 87-01, as well as on the developments directly abutting the street lights. Nock to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on arterial and certain collector streets. Improvement mtintenance 1s considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot basis. In the case of condominiums with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as a lot. SECTION 3. Plans and SDecificattons The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering D1vislon. Reference is hereby Wade to the subiect development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby node a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include; the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illuminatton of the subject area. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvenents will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs far azsessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 including Annexation No. 31 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lamps Annex New lamp Lamp Size* YTD No. 31 Total 5800E 444 0 444 9500E 463 2 465 16,000E 16 0 16 22,000E ~ 3 0 3 27,500E 15 0 15 *High Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps Rate Mo's Maint. Cost 5800E 444 X f 8.93 X 12 f 47,579.04 9500E 465 X f10.16 X 12 f 56,692,80 iu, wv"L 22,000E iu 3 "n ai "c. vu X 513.84 X i2 12 - '1n f ~~498.24 21,500 15 X 515.31 X 12 5 2,755.80 T otal Annual Maint. Cost = 5109,846.00 2. Costs Der dwelling Unit: YTD Assessment Unit = 14,049; Assess. Unit this Annex. 13 Total =14,062 Total Annual Maintenance Cost = f109 846.00 57.81 /year/untt No. o n sin s rict ~- Assessment shall apply to each lot as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Oiagr am Copies of the proposed Assessment Oiagrans are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1", Rnnexation No. 31. These diagrams are hereby incorporated withfn the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvaaents for the District are found to be of general benefit to all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Nhere there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot ar parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. Estimated assessments are for comparison only. Actual assessments will be set by public hearing each year in June and will be based on actual energy and maintenance expenses and developed land use summaries. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and deterwtnes to forma District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Erery year in Nsy, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. EJ(HIBIT °A° Properties and improvenents to be included within Annexation Mo. 31 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 1: PROJECT DR 87-01 Arterial LNIT 5800E ~45bbi~T,50aL 13 0 2 0 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM IANOSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. / ANNEXATION N0. j~ ~Mn~« 1OA[v~b ~. ~ ~ ; ; v .. ._ .I hr • ys ~, .~~ ,I , . I .,, 1f "~ _ _ _~ry _ i.~ 1. . 3 ! / .. ... ... ..,. z i .~..,. M I~ • I .~ ei ~~~ ~• •• Mt • i • i { T ] ~u iii s ATE ~''~`^ CITY OF RANCHO CUCPu~IONGA t _ ~` `= ~ ~~', '-i ° 1 EN(:INEEIiiNG DIVISION ~~.. ~ 13 VICINI'iY MAP N RESOLUTION N0. g~- SSp2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTIQI WITH ANNEXATION N0. 4 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR DR 87-01 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 2nd day of Septenber, 1987, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 87-482 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 4 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6, which Resolution of Intention No. 81-482 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, nati ce of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvenent", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the offfce of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duty mailed to all persons ownfng real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87-482, according to Lhe names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner ac rnnuirnA by law ac annc arc from fho off iAavii of Mailinn nn filo in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and tooter ni rg the necessity for Lhe contemplated work and the 6enef its to 6e derived therefran and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECT [ON 1: [t is hereby resolved 6y the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders Chat the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87-482, be done and made; and S ECT iON Thz Report fit ed by the Engi n~er is hereby finally approved; a.~- SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tracts have been occupied. ~9~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 Annexation No. 4 for DR 87-01 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is 1n compliance with 1, Division 15 of the Streets and (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). the requirements of Article 4, Chapter Highways Code, State of California SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex the developments within Commercial/Industrial areas enumerated in Exhibit "A" into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be matntatned.will have an effect upon OR 87-01, as well as on the developments directly abutting the street lights. Mork to be provided for with the assessments established Dy the district are: The furnishing of services and materiais for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on local residential streets. Icprovement maintenance 1s considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be uiiidcu' Ji, d yc! iJt udaie. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The Dlans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for Lhe development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 including Rnnexation No. 4 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lanps Annex New Lamp Lamp Size* YTD No. 4 Total 5800E 35 0 35 9500E 2 0 0 *Nigh Pressure Sodi un VaDar Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps Rate Mo's Maint. Cost 5800E 35 X E 8.93 X 12 = E 3,150.60 9500E 2 X E10.16 X 12 E 243.84 for ai Nnnuei rieini. Cusp = E 3, ri4. vti 2. Costs per dwelling Unit: YTD Assessment Unit = 199.58; Assess. Unit this Annex. 13 Total = 212.58 Total Annual Maintenance Cost E3 150.60 = E17,64/year/unit No. o Umts to tstnct "3~58- Assessment shall aDDiy to each lot as ezpl ai Wed in Section 6. SECT?ON 5. Assessment Oiaar am Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagr ans are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6", Annexation No. 4. These diagrans are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all deveiopmenis within the District and [hat assessment shall be equal for each unit. Where there is Wore than one unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the ;s essment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the nun ber of units per lot or parcel. Estimated assessments are for comparison only. Actual assessments will be set by public hearing each year 1n June and will be based on actual energy and maintenance expenses and developed land use summaries. SECTION 7. order of Events 1. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to fora a District or abandon the proceedings. 5. Every year in Nay, the City Engineer files a report with the Gity Council. 6. Every year 1n June., the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. EXH16[T "R" Properties and improvenents to be included within Annexation No. 4 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 6: Arterial TRACT IN ITS 5800L ~56b~~C DR 87-01 13 _ _ _ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ,/! LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. yp ANNEXATION NO. L, .~. .:. s ! .• .r~ M IYr • ' 1`: !f ~~~ i ~ 1uY~ 1~ • ~ M~ ~..~ r /// .i:: ~ ;~.~ 11 '.... _, .. / ~ / ~ ~ a~ ,: ~ / ~, ~ I ~' 5 ITE ~`~' cam" ~` CITY OF RANCHO Cl1GVV101~tGA ~ DR 87-OI '~i, ~~ ENGINEERING DIVISION ~ T b ~ VICINITY MAP 1V ~m - CITY OF RANCHO CCCA,rIOIr'GA ~iclsto STAFF REPORT ~.;~~ DATE: September 16, 1987 ~ s~ \~ '- T0: City Council and City Manager I F' FROM: _ Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer ~ 19-- BY: Duane Baker, Admin. Asst. SUBJECT: Appeal of Staff Decision to Remove the Median Island in the 9200 Block of Monte Vista City Council should deny the appeal of staff's decision to remove the median island in the 9200 block of Monte Vista. Background/gnalysis . Mrs. Judy Gundeson contacted the Maintenance Section by phone to discuss the possibility of replanting a tree in the parkway. The Gundersons had planted a tree in the area between a neighbor's drive approach and their own. The original neighbors move and the new owners of the house had the tree cut down, the new owners had the tree cut down without permission or a permit. Code Enforcement is working on this situation. Additionally, these new owners did not cut the stump down far enougn to allow tar landscaping re-establtsfallent. Code tnf orcement is working on this situation a5 well. Nhen this matter was investigated in the field by Jeff Barnes, Maintenance Supervisor, he advised Mrs. Gunderson that the tree would not be able to De replanted in the same place in the parkway because the tree would be too close to the concrete. However, replacement of the tree will be required to occur westerly of the two driveways where clearance is sufficient. At this same meeting in the field, Mrs. Gunderson brought up the issue of landscaping the median. During this discussion it was made clear that if any landscaping were done it would have to be done by the City or a licensed contractor in accordance with all City standards and regulations. It was point¢d out that landscaping on the median could nct be allowed to be installed or maintained by residents. :~ a99 NORTH -~R~ J - Monte Visty X98' C7~Q/G ~ ndrn/sc/.~ /163 ~~~+/~ U/Jac a/.~J' // /~-sc.9~st 6; /~;7 l`vss /r ra 4u~(Ce - `-rfy ~i.~rin PC~L /JP4/` `j ~ R ~ TirC ~~~joorC O ~ '{/(iS ~vY/s~ /s zoo ^e~u-sf you, 4ssirfcn~e i~ ~ t evf' S'f~iH. r- ~ (T/ou~a~ ~a~~ Ou2 f'oirn 9~d Ot~P2 5 /'P4P,ay' ///IoM f^,~cronrr in ~"j' o~G'ii+i~ // y0 u ~2 /~j~' ~ i/7 ~.~is ~?~s J'S~r2 Gdoo~~ bP i'~~`~y q~r~p~,0. fc~ l /fcr~/l /o v ~ Si2~ ~~Z j v_~ ,Z G ~~ 9~r o lion ni? '~~is /!;'a: Y>r 2 ~,-~ ~, o. fhC~n ~~~.^uryM. ~T i -„.,i, r~.~r-~, rr~~„ F,~ ~:. _N .r- s C~ ~~ CIT'.` Ut' R 1~CH0 CIICAMUNtii ~ -„ ~ ... ,. ~ -.. ~(f~ -1Ll-fr Aug,tst 25, :9c7 i '-0 Er{C Gu ndertOn ~ O~R-vA_ 926? Monte Vista St. Rancho Cuca~tlonga, CA 91701 'F^_~ Dear Mr. Gunderson: ~W~" "pper pp In response a your letter of August 6th, the engineering 0lvisian has rZ .-v~+ reviewed the island on your street. The landscaping of the island on your street must compete with other projects in Che City for 11tm1ted funds. The funds that the Ctty does ~~ have available far this type of pro,1«t are used in areas where there is a wider and .,tore general penefft. There are no funds available for a proyect of ;his type in a residential neighborhood. While rev'ew!n3 this sltua tlon, Engineering staff recognized a voo lem with the island ;n your street. the st roes in its current confsgu ra lion has sane note ntial probilms. Naw treat the City has )een .made aware of ,~ i 1=t. `S these aroae^~s, it is obligated to act. j lne island an your street has been referred to the Maintenance Section for removal. Toe island has Seen placed on the maintenance schedule for removal within the next few months. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please cal', me ar Duane 3aker a*. 989-1862. O[ 1 ~ 8 0 Sincerely , ta,NCNO CUCA110Y.GA MINI4TR~TIOM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT EP 021981 ENGINE INfrDIVISION ~It1h1t~1~1a0 `jam'/ ngtneer ~~ I 7 RHM%.a N,1 ~~ t x,11 p&~ ~~O ., ... ~ ' I. `~'aL /ti'ICLl~aV ~l~ CvHC'~ iy0t~v~C~1Umk-»^~r',~t •.; - gum' n.e~.i,~,ta~t.r~ `~"` ~ P~~ c~ =tiu.. ~~tcr ,-h-~- ~.~oaeYk, /riac~,,n,t~ ~o n,eu~° a~t,u, u~,, vYVIA1, ~,,,,~-~,~P- CAD atie. n,p,n, ~„ ~P~,,t,L . 0' G~ckuorm ;/~~ M.rvte. U~yt-v ~~a-w ~ , ~~~~ J jtumclto Curuma„~ , ('0. cm a E~RCNO cui u arcca ADMINISTRATION sFP oz iea~ sw,e,q~,tsoe,t,~ e ~J ~~ 7 Q~ 30 I - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Oate: October 7, 1987 To: From: By: Subject: ~~c~.tio~ ,P~% .~, ,. <~ ~~ y,a ~~~ ~~ _z City Council and City Manager =~-- .-' IuC- Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Paul A, Rougeau, Traffic Engineer Amen Anent to Section 10 of the Municipal Code establishing speed limits for Terra Yista Parkway, Base Line Road, Turner Avenue, Archibald Avenue and Church Street I RECOMMENDATION t i1-- s recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Ordinance amending Section 10.20.020 of the Municipal Code to establish speed limits as follows: 1, Terra Yista Parkway 40 MPH (from Church to Bel pine) 2. Base Line Road 45 MPH (From Hermosa to Haven) 3. Turner Avenue (Hermosa Ave.) 45 MPH (from Foothill to Base Line) 4. Archibald Avenue 50 MPH (from Banyan tc North end) 5. Church Street 40 MPH (from Haven to Elm) BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: e a ove streets eve been the subject of an engineering and traffic survey as prescribed in the Yehicle Code. The survey included such items as residential frontage review, street grades, accident history and radar i surveillance of prevailing speeds. I The proposed speed limit recognizes increased development and newly developed streets, and will enable effective enforcement without creating ~, an unreasonably high number of violators. Respect u1~ submitted, RHM:PAR. Attachment 302 ORDINANCE N0. ~~ `7 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.2D.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS UPON CERTAIN CITY STREETS A. Recitals (i) California Vehicle Code Section 22357 provides that this City Council may, by ordinance, set prima facie speed limits upon any portion of any street not a state highway. (ill. The City Traffic Engineer has conducted an engineering and traffic survey, of certain streets within the City of Rancho Cucananga which streets ae specified in Part B of this Ordinance. (iii) The determinations concerning prima facie speed limits set forth in Part B, below, are based upon the engineering and traffic survey identified in Section A (iii, above. O. Ordinance NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN A$ FOLLONS: Section 1 Section 10,20.020 hereby is amended to the Rancho Cucamonga City Code to read, in words and figures as follows: :0.20.020 Decrease of state law maximum speed. It is determined by City Council lEeso ution an upon t e as s o an eng veering and traffic investigation that the speed permitted by state law if greater than is reasonable or safe under the conditions found to exist upon such streets, and it is declared that the prima facie speed limit shall be as set forth in this section on those streets or parts of streets designated in this section when signs are erected giving notice thereof: Name of Street or Portion Affected 1. Archibald Avenue -Fourth Street to Banyan Street 2. Arrow Route - Baker to Haven 3. Haven Avanup - Highland t0 Nf150n 4. Hellman Avenue - Foothill to Alta Loma Dr. 5, Hellman Avenue - 6th to Foothill 6, Hellman Avenue - 500' north of Manzanita to Valley View Declared Prima Facie Speed Limit (MPH) 45 45 50 35 45 40 303 CITY ORDINANCE Re: Speed Limits October 7, 1987 Page 2 7. Beryl Street - 900' north of Lemon 40 to Banyan 8. Beryl Street - Banyan to end 45 9, Base Line Road - Nest city limit 45 to Carnelian 10, Base !ine Road -Carnelian to Haven 40 11, Carnelian Street - Foothill to end 45 12, Eighth Street - Grove to Haven 45 13. Etiwanda Avenue - Foothill to Highla~ 45 14. Highland Avenue -Amethyst to Archibald 35 15. Grove Avenue - Eighth W Foothill 40 16. Turner Avenue - Eighth to Foothill 45 17. Sapphire Street - 19th to Lemon 40 1B. Sapphire Street - Banyan to end 45 19. Vineyard Avenue = Church to Base Line 40 20, Nhittram Avenue - Etiwanda to east 40 city limits 21. Victoria Park Lane 35 22. Banyan Street -from west city limits to 40 Beryl Street 23. NT1 l;tde Road - from Ranch Gate to 35 Amethyst Street 24. Church Street - from Archibald Avenue 40 to Haven Avenue 25, San Bernardino Road -from Vineyard Avenue 35 to Archibald Avenue 26. Victoria Avenue -from Etiwanda Avenue 40 to Route 15 27. Highland Avenue -from Archibald Avenue 35 to Hermosa Avenue 28. Highland Avenue -from Hermosa Avenue to 45 B00' west of Haven 29, Vineyard Avenue -from 8th St. to 45 Foothill Boulevard 30. Center Avenue -foothill Blvd, to 40 Church St. 31. Lemon Avenue - Archibald Avenue to 40 Haven Avenue 32 Spruce Avenue - Elm Avenue to Oase Line Rd. 40 33, Turner Avenue - Foothill Boulevard to 45 Base Line Road 34. Victoria Ni nd rows Loop (north 8 south) 35 3i. Banyan Street from Beryl Street to 35 Landon Avenue 30~ CITY ORDINANCE Re: Speed Limits October 7, 1987 Page 3 36. Terra Yista Parkway -Church W 8elpine 40 37. Base Line Road - Hermosa to Naven 45 38. Turner Avenue (Hermosa Ave.) - Foothill 45 to Base Line Road 39. Archibald Avenue - Banyan to North end 50 40. Church Street - Naven to Elm 40 (Ord. 169 Section 1 (part), 1982: Ord. 39 Section 5.1, 1978). Rancho Cucamonga 5/82 124 (i) Both sixty-five (65) miles per hour and fifty-five (55) miles per hour are speeds which; are more than are reasonable or safe; (ti) The miles per hour as stated are the Drtma facie speeds which are most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and are speed limits which are reasonable and safe on said streets or portions thereof; (iii) The miles per hour stated are hereby declared to be the prima facie speed limits on said streets; and (iv) The Traffic Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to install appropriate signs upon said streets gluing notice of the prima facie seeed limit declareA hPrei n. Section 2 The Cf ty Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Drdi Hance and shall cuase the same to be published as required by law. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Dafiy _R_eport, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of 6n tar o, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. i~~L~ ----- CITY OF RANCHO CI;CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 1, 1987 .~ ~ I T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council i FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer '~ BY: Joe Stof a, Jr., Rssoci ate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Use of Condemnation to Obtain Off-site Easements far en a eve roc o. reenv ew s a es. s a request or rty ounce D rec on oncern ng he use of possible condemnation proceedings to obtain an off-site drainage easement necessary for the development of proposed Tentative Tract No. 13650 located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Baker Avenue. (APN 201-201-30, 41, 42 and 43) RECOMlENUATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve in concept the passible future condemnation action to obtain an off-site drainage easement necessary for the development of proposed Tentative Tract No. 13650 II. ABSTRACT: Staff is requesting City Council direction concerning the use of possible condemnation proceedings to obtain an off-site drainage easement necessary for the development of Proposed Tentative Tract No. 13650 located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Baker Avenue. III. BACKGROUND: The Developer of Proposed Tentative Tract No. 13650 is required to obtain an off-site drainage easement from the prodect site to an acceptable disposal ;ice as determined by Che City Enyineer (Exhibit A). The Developer has obtained a drainage easement through the existing Mobile Home Park, but currently has been unable to obtain the off-site drainage easement through the "Old Labor Camp property", which is presently vacant. 30(~ IV. o1 SCUSSIDN: Staff rwrmal ly requests that all off-site easements De obtaf ned prior to scheduling protects for a Planning Commission Hearing. The Developer has spent a substantial length of time attempting to obtain the required off-site drainage easenents. He feels confident that the off-site drainage easement can be obtained in a timely manner, but needs to proceed forward with the protect due to considerable carrying costs. The Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462.5 (Exhibit B), states that the City cannot withhold approval of a subdivision Final Map because an easement for off-site improvements has rrot been acquired by the Developer. Essentially, either the City is forced to acquire the easenent for the Developer (through negotiation or condemnation) or the requirement fs automatically waived. The portion of property needed for the off-site easement is currently vacant. There has not been a formal protect submittal for this site as yet. If the Developer is unable to acquire the off-site easements within the allowable time period, he will be responsible for all costs incurred by the Condemnation proceedings including the cost for the easement itself. wii CL'dS i Cri . Staff feels that the use of condemnation is reasonable in this case, therefore is re comnen ding that the Council approve its use in concept. If the Council should decide against its use, staff would be obligated to recommend to the Planning Commission that the protect be denied due to Che possibility that proper drainage facilities would not be provided for the Development. Res pe u ubmitted, "~~-~--~ RHM:JS~' 30 ~ 4~J~. N~ ~'~ F opt .` .~ ~ MHP S-TE ` _ _ EA rST~N( EASEMENT ROUTE FOR n.F~S~TE DkFlInIRGE FRCILITlcS ~-~ `< F~ M H P ~I ~I ~' vRCANT ~ Wi w z~ SEMI- DEVELOPED CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEF.ItiNG DMBION I = g Cl^J' ~ V N rcEl~: T T 13b50 GFF~S/TE RR/NRG 'ppiZ,E; REQWREMENTS n Q . Ir7 30 $ aiea2.5. Appeaval et anal wag caretot be rrleaed because of ofFeik bsr proveeteM requbesuenla an laed nrM bebsKM{a w4dMdon w local apwary A ory. county, orciryand counryshall not postpone orrefuu approval of a final map becawe the wbdivider hu failed to meet a tentative map condition which requim the subdivider to conwuct or imWl ofisite improvements on land in which neidter Me wbdivrder nor the IoW a6eM'v Me tentative or final map is filed with Me lout agenq, to permit pro improvements to be made. In such cases, the city, coumy achy and county shall, wkhin 120 days of the !fling d the final map, Dunuant to Sectors 66151, acquire by oration orcommince procreedingpunuanr ro 7itle7 Icommencin{ wiM SMlon 12)0.0! of of Pan) of [he Code of Civil ProclMurc to acquire an interest in Me lend which will permit Me improvements to be made, indudin{ proceeding for immedau poser lion of the property underArtide 3lcommencingwiM Section 7255.1101 of Ctrap[er 6 0l such title. In Me event a city, county, or city and county lads to meet Me 120.day time limitation, the condition /or conunsction of olhite improvements shall be conclusivelydeemed to be waived. Prior to approval of Me Nnal map Me city, county, or city and county may regtnre the subdivider tp enter into an a{rcement to complete the improvements punumt to Section 66161 a[ wch time as the city, county, or<rry and county arno~.... ..._. __.........~'.+ ,. m... ,. li ycuuu rite miyrovemenu to oe made. Nothing in this section precludes a Ury, county. or my and county from requiring a subdiwder to pay the cost of acgmnng oNsne real property interests requued in connection wnh a subdwision. "OHsite improvements," as used m this sechon, does not include improvements which are necessary to assure replacement orconstruchon of housing for persons and hmilies of low or moderate income, as defined m Sectors 5009) of the Health and Safety Code. (Amended, Chapter 910, Stawtes of 19811 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DIVISION TPEM: TRHCT_1,~50 q'i'17aE; tUYO1VISlON MAP ACT M e Ir ~0 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: To: From: Subject: September 16, 1987 CU~MO~C ~' ' y'n ~ = 0 0 Fil ~ _ Vi > 19- Mayor and City Council Members Bill Holley, Community Services Director Review of Park Development Fee Schedule City Council Agenda, September 16, 1987 Recommendation; It is the recommendation of the Park Development Commission that City Council review and adopt, in accordance with the attached, the revised City Park Development Fee Schedule. Should City Council desire to adopt the fee schedule as recommended, this can be accomplished through the adoption of Resolution No. 87-489, hereto attached. Background: Chapter 16.32 of the Rancho Cucamonga Mur,i cipal Code addresses park land dedication in subdivisions or in- lieu fee thereof. It is t..*.e latter that is in discussion here, the in-lieu fee. The fee is a product of Ordinance No. 105 adopted in June of 1980 and amended three times there after. Once to iuGG':.. _.._~_ 1ut-.._-_ t~ :.... i..a.. •i.,. ri+n..nA ....n.nnnir:cc• nnro i.., y....y.. .-____ _.._ __ ........ to strengthen the private open spade criteria; ana,~ once in response to new legislation (SB-1785, FORAN). Two supporting Resolutions to this Ordinance, 83-9 and 83-10, establishing park land development costs and population density per unit, respectively, are currently operative. In this instance it is the former, park development cost per acre that is in need of revision. Additionally, consistent land values per acre within 'land use designation' categories need be established. First, before going into more detail about the revision, a brief review of how the in-lieu fee formula works. Formula: NSP (L + D) = fee 1000 Where; N = Number of proposed dwelling units. s = Standard park acreage per 1000 populat icn. P = Population per dwelling unit. L = Land value as represented by land being subdivided. D Development cost per acre for park land. Park Development Fee Schedule September 16, 1987 Page Two For example, a developer wished to subdivide a parcel of land into 472 lots and provide detached single family dwelling units on each. This is how the formula currently works: N = 472 S 3 acres maximum as regulated by State. P = 3.43 per household per 1979 special census. L = 40,000 per acre (1983 Cost) D - 48,000 per acre (1983 adopted figure). 472 x 3 x 3.43 x (40.000 + 48.000) _ $427.405.44 1000 or $905.52 per unit The "L" factor is really a variable depending on category of land use, The current formula, however, does not distinguish between land use values. Land values (the "L" factor) should be recognized by potential land use rather than an overall average by product type as is currently practiced. It costs the City no less to buy LM land for a park than it costs the developer to buy LM land for townhouses. In discussion with major developers in our City and with the BIA, and a review of recent land sales in the City, the rollowlnq values, Which are shown at the 75 percentile of the range of each residential land use, are proposed for use in the formula. VL = $ 43,057 per acre L = 72,242 per acre LM = 91,233 per acre M = 131,678 per acre MH 152,305 per acre H 211,000 per acre The "D" factor was set below actual cost in 1983 at $48,000 per acre and remains at that figure today. Statistically we can show that park development is currently running right at $80,000 per acre, i.e., total for our most recent park, iierresa, -- $758,.'",93 cr $79,OOG per acre. ..ewis confirms like costal and higher expenses in Terra Vista for their park construction. Park Development Fee Schedule September 16, 1987 Paqe Three Therefore, it is recommended that the cost for developing park land per acre, "D", should be established as true cost to develop, that is, $80,000 per acre. The attached seven page matrix addresses the implementation of the preceding paragraphs. The matrix and the new proposed fee schedule appear complicated, however, they are not. For example, to determine a developers fee only two questions need be asked: "What is your designated land use?", and "What is your product type?" In addition to the matrix, we have attached copies of Ordinance 105 and it's supportive resolutions. Thank you. BH:ks cc: Proposed Resolution 87-489 Park Fee Summary w/Land Use attachments Sales Summary sheet by land use flrAina..ro inc incr ~av __ Resolution 83-9, 87-10 y~ RESOLUTION N0. 87-489 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AVERAGE COST PER ACRE TO DEVELOP PARK LAND IN RANCHO CUCAHONGA AND ESTABLISHING AVERAGE COST PER ACAS BY LAND USE DESIGNATION TO ACQUIRE PARK LAMA IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA. WHEREAS, the City Council of -the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has adopted Chapter 16.32 of the Municipal Code, relating to regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees, or both, for park and recreational land in subdivisions and planned communities; and WHEREAS, Chapter 16.32 of the Municipal Code establishes a formula requiring as components, "(the) average cost per arse to develop park land as determined by the public agency", and, "(the) fair market value of parkland per acre as represented by the land being subdivided"; THEREFORE, BE IT NOW RESOLVED by the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. That the City Council shall determine and set by Resolution the average cost per acre to develop park land in Rancho Cucamonga and the average cost per acre to acquire parkland in Rancho Cucamonga; and 2. That the City Council shall review and adjust by Resolution, when warranted, the cost to develop and acquire park land in Rancho Cucamonga; and 3. The average cost per acre tc develop park land in Rancho Cucamonga is hereby established at Eighty Thousand Dollars ($80,000), and it is that figure of Eighty Thousand Dollars ($80,000) per acre that will apply in the application of Chapter 16.32 of the Municipal Code; and 4. The average cost per acre to acquire park land in Rancho Cucamonga, for the purpose of implement Chapter 16.32 of the Municipal Code, is hereby established by Land use designation at; Very Low Low Low Medium Medium Medium-Big High (VL) (L) (Lt. ) (M) i(MH) (H) _ $ 43,057 per acre $ 72,242 per acre _ $ 91,233 per acre _ $131,678 per acre _ $152,305 per acre _ $211,000 per acre and at these figures that will apply 'n application of the aforementioned Municipal Code Chapter. 5. The average cost per acre to develop and acquire park land as determined by this Resolution shall apply to tentative maps or parcel maps, approved or conditionally approved, on or after September 16, 1987. The average cost per acre to develop park land for tentative maps or parcel maps approved prior to September 16, 1987 shall be as set forth in Resolution No. 83-9 and previous land value method. Effective January 1, 1988, the procedures and provision of Resolution 87-489 supersede procedures and provisions of Resolution 83-9 and it shall be the provisions of Resolution 87-489 which shall apply to all tentative maps or parcel maps approved or conditionally approved without respect to date of such approval. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of September, 1987. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dennis L. Stout, Mayor rmms °'^: Beverly A. Authelet, City /~ 5Q 5` L W ,W fi Y Q G. a ~ ~, ,~ a .. ~ ~, _ ~ ~ ~ o p 1 ti m ° n ~ i a • ~ N q q N q ti q q T ~ OI In M N + C ~ i m a In ci ~n .~ m In In e i c ~ i lu In c~ 0 0 o ,~ ~ 1I1 M q q q • • M ~ l0 H •' ti H N M N tp W ~ ~ m ri v to In Q ° O ~ u i a n m m i N • s N q ~-1 q q ti q q q W r Oml N m b m Q ~ r-1 CO 1p N O ~ n N N ~ J e i Q 1 1 a : ., .. 6 q q W b9 N J 1~ ~ J 3 6 q • 4p • N J = .p ~ ~ ~ ~ i 1 N 1 1 1 1 1 1 q 6 ~ E$ a Z r N ~ •' N l7 ~!' j p 07 H ~ Z pd $e F ~ n D • • r Q . • " ~ _ e _ o s $ ' _ ¢ ~ ~ K M V Q Q N V l J J ~.1= O t F H o J 0 x °o N ~ X u N ~ N 1 1 1 1 I 61LL q gv OLL Y N W N 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 ; 1 I O CF f'1 W ~ S °> •« u° S O °o ~ w 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I ,'. >'.`, e In o n ~ M I I I 1 I I ... I 1 ..r ' - I 1 ~ u M ~~ O 6 G p ~ 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 <S 6 6 O1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 ' Y i~ j ~ 1 I I I co l I I I I I I I I I fWA °~ ~ O Z g = ~ a a ~ ~ C ° i ~ ~ g a J W a N Z in z J W 3 N O LLI to D Z J 6 ~ I~ W 6 f H O N Y ~ ~ y~j I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 s q n ~ y IpW ~ 1 I 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 1 of r-1 VI I ~ I~ ~~ O O O a u O C O 1 1 I 1 1 1 M` Y 6 „ I I 1 I I 1 .~. o N Y• 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A g p 1 1 I ~' m i ~~ ~ , 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 o u oc m 1 io i i I ; i m 1 • 0 ~ 1 I 1 1 1 I I ~ y ~ ~ .ten I I ~ T i O . . 9 v ~ ° $ h p = ~ ~ f 6 1 J F W n m `° m b ~ L M ~Y ¢ p ~ pl N N O 1 1 1 = r h Q ~ Oe h N l Q u M y~ IL I2 W fA W W W W N Y a N o I a = W S I b S N u1 1 L 1 f s_ 1. < ~ = W 1 1 = LL ;~ m In n J G F W W /i /i r ¢ O _ _ _ , ^ V ~- _.. u 7 p ~ 0 0 J ,- o o 0 0 0 0 ~ ° ° i W o I Y 0 0 0 o o 1 1 ,o m 0 W 3 1 p ~ w M O . Vi a G f ~~ a N J Y M N ~ N N N I N N ti ~ ~ P W M W M di I ( = m ti ~ n . r e C N Q ~ I r a 6M m N I N N 1 I 1 W x~ 0 e _ M M I m m m I i x I ;, l m 1 O ? I u '"'i N M ct ~ 1 s =1 ~ i .J `"'~ i I I I I I i ~ Ill N ~ Y ~ g O ° 4 W d f `.~_J'{ W 0 a do W W N Q J N W N 6 ~ 1~ .. p ~ w WI2 0.LL N w W o n u .-~ IY ~ I O u ~' !~ LL ~ J < of N w o - i I 0 .. o 0 I Y 0 m w r w ti J ~ N w C I ~° _ a I ~ I m O x o 0 I N 16 6 m ti ~ N ~ ~ N 10 ~ I°n ~ a ~ ~ N b a ti n m i w w w w w W N O~ 10 O d ~+ ~C Y C ° ~ ~ ~ m > d > L Ol I ~ w a w w - n n __ -- o °o ° o o ° 0 o 0 °m w °m w 0 m w 0 m w 0 ao w I _ ~. r 10 m b W b - ~ b m e ~ -i m .. w ti w ~y m w .... ti w - N (^ w - I I - .._ l7 O~ N N ~ N I N I N I H I "~ I I I M I ~ I ' N C O I I I I ~ I I N N ^ 6 6 a ~ v / 6 a c~ F LL Q W d N F /~{ V N` Y 1 1 W y 0 2 5 c w a ~ ii i Wli W su o = LL ~ ~ 1 J h p°H H ___ o ~o tae i ~ yMy 1 i y + - J ;4 i c• ~ J G C i ~ O y ;O ' OV ~ P 6 X ~ O ti ~ he N ~ ~O ~ wM ~ yu 6 L X w 2 2 a 2 ~ p.L Isol ., ~ a rn ~ n N l~I O+ 10 of mn ~ O~ Orn ~ O tp p ~ ~ ~ p W p W .~ N O n ~ ~ N O ~ ~ O b ~ C > L ~ C L 6 ~ ~ M p V p ~" p O O O O O O O ~ O . ~ W V1 p N O W W ~ m n n M ~y W N WI N W N p N w ~ 1 fh I m I ^l l ~n I VlI N I N I N I ^~ I ti l ~ ~ I M I ~ I M I C'I ~ 1 N I m l S I N I o~ Z P .~ e Z V p ~ M ' o a ? $ a Z a W a z '~ V Z J J W O 1 `Y N V 0 Z a J LL~ w J 0 c x o 0 .-y ~I xI S ;- I I O~ t~ ~~, b m h rn ~ rn o b N O~ O N rn e m N N O LL I u h m til 1h O G C ~ I N h m ~ ~^ V O1 O ° ~ n~ m .o L w ar e W .n rn o _ _ f _ __ _ cu O O O O ;' W m l °o °o o l °o o '~ L - N - N CJ N N i C i I I I i `L I C' N I h IP l i I N N I N ~ til I I L= j I ~ ~ I m M m m m l ~ _ a II ~ c i I ,III i E i rn ^ ~ N N M C' i _ C i<<l ~ i ~ ~ N " i i i i _ s ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ = i 201E: 2 r/a ttOSlNB : PANCEL : SALES ; GATE 812E FAKE : f/AC : OFFSITES : CONAENTS ~xxx = - _ _--1- ___-_- 12/!0/96 9.73 !178,500 : f/9,076.4T : Ail to Site . ltl01I86 : 3.03 : SZ00,000 : !34,603.96 : All to Site 09/08/86: 3T. R1 : !1,537,500 s t16,860.11 : par , 03!03/86 : 11.76 : f/00,000 : !3{,013.61 : All to Site 04/T6/R5 : 83.62 : !2,840,000 : t33, A8/. B1 : Rax 02/12/86 ; 3.13 ; !169,000 : f31,123.39 : Pax IT/IZ/86 : P.00 : !600,000 : tT5,000.00 : par : Eti xanda SP 121!6/86 : 10.00 : 5370000 : t37,000. b) : All to Site Etixanda SP iT/09/86: 82.77 ~~ ~~~ : tT,110, 000 ; ~~~ !28,271.11 : All to Site iota! Acres _ - ~ =265.19:- -~--:~:xaa:__= =_____::__-_____ ________ ______ IoGI Bales fr. ce !8,895, C00 Avenge Prio/Acre t33,311.94 lint al Sales Price/iota! Avesl (16,018.28 ITotal Oall ars per Acre/Mua6er of Sap lesl IONE: 1 to B uPo 0.0SIM6 : RAACEI : SALES , OR1F : SIZE t PAICE flAC : 8FF5IlE5 COmIENiS 12/26/86 : 15:13: 11,OdT,000ao zl68,B26.96 : R11 to 5i teva ~ Tenbti ve up 11!19/86 : 11.79: 11,250,900: tI0B,790.a"'S :Ail to Site : 0//12!86 : 32,73: !2,133,500 : t63, 181.05 : Rti to Site ientati re xap 12/22)86 : 1,33 : 1331,DOQ : t]d,091.95 r RII tq Site 12/22/86 : d. I4 : f/69,500 : t75~B/8. i1 : Aax t0/21/06 : /, it : SISB,50U : 538,561.18 ; pll in 1 vaa .. as W z __ ________~ ~___ Total Acres 71.3 Total Bates Frice 55,101,500 Rveraye Price/Acre N2, 738.90 I1gG1 Sales Price/iota: Acres! 572,217.71 !iota! Bgll ars per Acre/Nuxber of 5apl esl IONE: 2 to 4 u/a CLOSUI6 : PAflCEL OAIE 511E OJ/16/86 : 15.91 IY/11166 : 4.75 07/28/86 : 1.24 In Escrox : 68.00 5AiE5 (RICE !/AC ; OFFSIiES CCNMENIS ~~fi, 181, 000 :~~~571,607. t7 : AIl'appear in~. ~~=__~~~- ~~~-- f330,000 : /69, 17J.60 ; All to Site tentative aap f2A¢, 000 : t6ii92/.5I : Rax , s/, 430, 000: 165,117.08 :Aax :No docwentatign fatal Acres 92.9 iq{al Salez Price 16,235,090 Average Frice/Acre 167, 115. IR Iigtai Sales Fnce/igtal Avesl fd9a2¢e.ll ligtal Ogti ars per Acre/Xue6er a4 Saplesl IlN1E: 1{ to 21 u/a LLOAIN6 : PARCEL GATE SIZE 12i 31/B6 :~~~=1.16 1111 J/Ab : 17.15 10lOJ/A5 : 16.17 TaGI Acres Total Sales Fr ice Merage Price/Acre mac• a s~ a „~. SALES FAKE f/AC ; AFPGIIES : CAMNENTA ===51)1, OOd : 7115,517.2/ : All to Site ~~. ~~_-____- f6A0,d00 : LJ9,650.15 : An f3,070, 089: 1189,857,16: Ail appear in __===_31.18 _____ ___ ___._:____ ___ __ _ ______ __ 73,884, OOU 7i I2, 645.01 liotal Aaies Price/Total Aoesl 7115,008.38 liotal Ooli ors per kre/Muaber of Saap le CLOSI!!G : PAACfL ; SALES OA7E SilE FAKE S/AC : OFFSIiEA CdNAE!li5 st2/3U/Od :~~~15.Z5 ; t2, U50,000 : t1 ;1, 426. Z3 ; All to Site~~=.=__~~______________________ 04/17!86 : 8.79: tI.OAS,UiN : fIZ3, 135.72 : A^ in 09/il/A6 : B.79 : f1, 100, Oii0 : 1125,112.21: All in Il/15185 : A. 66 : 11,155,090: 7113, S71.BZ : All appear in :Frln inu. S105,00~i apt! on t inl ai Acres-.=_ =_-__ _":u.la.:_-'__________-_-' __--___,_,__aaaea..~e._e.eea.------- iotal Sales Fr ice f5,390, 000 Av=nge Price/Acre f12Y, 910. A2 liotal Sates Price/ToGI Rcresl S IZ9,U91.00 liotal Ool l ors per AcrelAcaher of 5aples) O0.p1HANCE N0. 10$ AN O0.0[NANCE OF PIE Cltt COUNCIL OP PIE Citt OF RANQ10 WGVgNOA, CALIFORx[A, g3TADL[SIIINO REOUfA- TONS FOg DEO[GTtON OP IaiND, PAYMENT OF PEES, OR BOltl, Eo0. PARR AND RECREATIONAL LAND IN SU{O1VIStoNS AND PLANNED GO[TNNLSIE3. r TAa Clty Council o[ the C1[y of kaneM1a Cu<avwiga, G11[ocnlt, don ordain o lollws: S¢elon 1: Incant aM General Prorle ions. The Lnemt of [hL Dcdlntnea A cv p[o•ida [or cN devalopmene of ptrk and r utlontl aaeill do ch'ough smbdtvialmn [eguL tiont. Sn an ¢u Mara Ma nod far ptrkt hu been decarmintd. Etch subdivider of LaW [or reaidan [lal va shall, a e <aMfctan to eb apDr¢nl of a [foal par<LL mtD, find abd SvLlan sap, or planned <awmanicy, dedicate lands oe paY Etaa In lieu ebreo(, or • canbintelon at bo [ly Eor pack and/or were clans! put peace. Oad ica[lon requ4mnta ahdl be a nveyed eo [M1e Clcy concu¢ane to recocdaclon of cha tine! parcel map oc tlnd aubdlvitlen map ar prior to Lautnct vE building peniea. In lieu [na shall be paid tv eba CLty prior to Lsotnct pf buflding pemlcs. ' ' Sec [ton 2. Aequlttwen[t. 40d or Gn nqulred uM a[ Chia ' ac [Smn afull ba cenvyad ¢[ pa ld dives tly [o [ha Clcy of bncho Cucamonp. The C1 [y fn t<up[in{ tuck Lod ar tuMS ahail develop cha LM or ass ' eM Evnds a hanin provided: , (A) Vu of Land and Paed. Tha Lod, fua, or eoabina [ion cha rent • • ca ba used only [mr cha purpost o[ pravld in{ park or ratnaclonQ Lciticiea uh lch will reuvaubly sane or bandit [aeon residann of snch subd iv lsimn. ' L (B) Ea cabl4hmmt and Deveippmm[ Time. My tees <oilac ad uauler this ordinance aM1LLl ba comicced vlchln five (3) yeah dear eM psymenc of meh teas or cha Ssuance of bailding pecml.ta on one-halt oL Mt lose created by eh< mbd ivlaivn, vhlch<ver o<cun lacer. I[ wch f sea a e no[ corral aed, they shell be dL tribuced and ptld w she than cord ro era of ens aubdlvlaion in eM1a name propscelan cha[ Me aloe of cbeir lot bean cv cha eo cal tna o[ all to to vitM1ln the aubdivtalmn. (C) Land DSapoaitien. In the event [Mc apporeunieias Evr be[[e[ ie<[eatton Eaclllelee cM1an topes pm vaueu Li :.. .. ' macerlallze, the land so dedicaced may be eotd with [he proceeds tM1era- Erom being med tar saleable pick end r ee cfon [eelli clm vM1l <h serve , the nelghbo dlaad Sn vhlch chat subd iv Sa ivn la located. (0) Only the payment vE Eees shall be required Sn aubdtvialona of lees than FS[cy (50) lob unloa agreed ocherviae by the Cicy Cvuncll ' aM the subd lv tde c. (E) Scavdarda for Oedlcaria n. The ameunc of land co be dedicaced or cha lees to be paid shall beer a reasonable rela[ionahlp to the use of beneffb of cha park and recreaclvn [ac iii [lee by the future ealden ea of the subd Svfaion. The Clcy Council herehy mcab lfahn s ra cio a( [lve (5) perk scree to one thousand (1,000) population, Sn co[danct vlch eM adopted Park end Recreo cion Elamene of the C1[y'a L Ce neral Plan. (F) Amoune of Palk Fees Regalred, Nhen ch¢ requlremenra of tlLLa cote v e evmplleJ vt[b on the bns la of p[av ld log perk fees, the uw~t u( fe¢s c. be pa ld !bail n. ~nmpu ud by uainR !ha Evllcv ing (ormv la am V,J C:NIIYY IIY. 1V1 Page 2 FORNIItA: N1y~60) - nlnimw Eee VXE0.E: N - nwbar of Dropased duelling en1b. g . planned park acreage per 1,OD0 population. P ~ population pec dme lling unle on • stela aed ( dmalcy eat by cha mpomibla public a[amy. L - talc mrkec value of parkland Der a<re as nprmen ced by [M land Daln¢ subdivided. D - average <ort p<[ acre co develop park av decacnined by cha pabllc :gen<y. (G) Amon[ of I+M 0.egalrld. tihenev at cha [equlrsenb o[ this action era cwpllad of [h an [ha bm la of providinb Park LM, the nln luau amunc of land requlrN shell ba ehe amount which twit Ds purchaeN vich cha [am cmpuud io g¢cion f(F). (tl) Park and Raerea [Salul Vaa Lnd Fair Wrbe VNa:a. the talr mrkec value atoll ba da arvinad •e ehe clue o[ wco[daeton o[ cM petal mep a[ tiwl mp In aceordanee ml[h [ha tolloxin{ e[Stkala: (1) The tali mrkec value as determined by d4.'Clty Goun<I1: a[, (]) Tf [ha mbdividar ob)ec[s ro ouch evaluaalon he mn ac hla own expmw, ebcaln an aPpnlaai of ch. prep= t^ by ! vuali[Sad real eetan apPUiaer fxw the gmeul area approved by cha CSey,.Ahlch ts reasonable IE t ou app[aisal mey he accapctd by [h< Ciey Council L (I) Cwbinatian of Pa[k God and Fees Requtred. then a cumbina[fan of ln:d ded ic.ci¢n and in lieu 4ea a a required as a eondieiee. r ba did SCaced, m of approval, ehe Esir mrkec value of cM land [a de eerminM purauenc co Seceion 1(N), and cha in lieu Eeee, as ewpueed under Sec ciao 1(F), atoll De of an egml value co provSeion of Section .. _. .. .~. ...... ...4a,.., .1.,.. ,.. aann.A rnwunl [v. •~•. rr'~ 5 ec [SOn 7: Procedure. The requiremen[a of this Ordinance shall be met cancu¢en[ co the approval of [he Elnal parcel mp, final subd SVi9f<n map, or Cha planned community, o[ prier [0 19auepce of building permits, by the provision eE park land in whole or in pec[, the payTenc of a park fee, or by a cowbina cfon of bo [h as required by the CL'y Council, (A) Cl[y Op clo n. At the elms o[ filing a tentative trace map or a minor aubd lv is ion plat Eor approval, ebe Clcy atoll determine vhe Chet ded ice clan of pm perry for park and recrea cl<ml putpo ses O[ in lieu Of Eee9 a necessary. IE ehe Cicy desires dedica clan, the at ea aha ll b< designs ced on [he cents clue tract map when subvia ced. (B) Action a[ CS ry. At the [ime of the [coca CVe [fact map approval, the Plenni cg Lomtss ton shall adeeecm ins a9 per[ of such d t: _ o,,,,...... ..• .~. aVV: we:o v u~. c :.x.1::. t. ... .. ~... ...,. payment [ aefee•in~l/eu dwreoE,~lr a~combine cfon oF~boch.v (C) Pr<requb Reg Eor ApPr<vat of FSnel Nap. Nhere deJ iczcfon is often ed and accepted lc shall be accomplished in acebrdanu vtth ehe provt9lons of she Subd tv to ion Map Ac[. Nhe re Fees ere r~ulred the a e she 11 ba depaa iced vich [he G1 cy prior co [M Suuance a[ build log permits. ...... ..... Page ) (0) gste[nl v cion, The plrnning Cavlaslon shall Jere mins vhethe[ to [wulre land d<tl Station, raw ire paynene of a [n In lieu tha[w[, or a combination of both, by cov ld<ratlon o[ chs [allowing: (1) Rausa [Soul eleaenc o[ [he general Dlan; uM (3) Topography, 6eolagy, access and lo<ufop of EEE--- laekl In the aubdl-dalon available for dedlca [Son{ and 1 (]) Si se end slope a[ ehe wbd3vleion aM land available Eoe aubdlvLLLOn, (E) Pack and Recrea [Saul Vsa 4nd-Credit [or Privau C Open gPacq NAara private open epau [o[ park and teem [ioaal pu[peaaa 1a provided Sn • p[owaed eubdiv b ion and such epau L co be priva eelq used end maintained by ehe fu tvra esateenta o[ cM wbdivistoo, au<h crest shall be crM Seed up co [i[cy (50) percent aguvc the requlrmenr o[ dMieatlon [a[ pack and r¢waiion purpaua, a eat [oich Sn Saetion 2(C), prwlded tM Palnning Coavia•ion Linde !t Sa Sn cAe public lnurene co do sc, aM clue the fallowing etandarda arc net: (1) Mac yards, eoua grey, saebacb and other open area nqulred co be main wined by cha wn(ng and bu Siding uguL Ciov dull not be included in the coaPUbtion o[ sueA Pr3wq open apua: and (2) Thu cAe pr iva to evaeuM1lp wd paiecenanu of cha open epau !a adage rely provided for by w[Setem gremm[; aM (1) Thu cM1e use of the p[Svsu open space Ss [ea cricted for Daik and recreationd purpwee by recorded cavevn[1 which run of eh N< Lod In favor of the fueura owners aF the peopertq vitAln the tact; nd l (4) TMt the proposed private open epee is [easovbly adep cable for uu for park and ncnacl~nal purpous, [wkly Snco cov idsu cion wch tacwv • cap^ecaphv, geology, access aM louclan o[ Me privets openaaPacs land; aM (5) That Fau llicies proposed [or [he open space ace 1n subs eanefel acaordann wleh the prowls low of ehe [ec[eetional element of [he general plan, and are approved by cM1e Planning CamrUaion. (F) Pack aM Reaeacional Land Cradle for PL nned Communl [tee. Bheta private open sDa ce Eor park and recreaclonal purposes Sa provided in a planneE covamnl[y and portlom of ar all aucM1 space is eo be priva ttly owned and maims toed by the future resldenw of she planned eamuniey, credit agaivt the requirmev of dedicatipn [or park end cecreaclonal DorDOSCa, as see [o ah in Sec cion i(C) shall be determined theough the adoD Clon of the Dlanned community text provided, M1owever, [hoc the park standard Eoc ea Ld planned comunic is the same as for any o Umr develapmenc and cha[ [he Planning Commisafon [Sods St is Sn the publicree [sr<ac to do ao, erd chat thn Eo Sloe ing s[andarda ace mac: ' (il Tha[ yards, court a eas, se [bat ks and ocher open a required to be ma in ca load by the xoning end bu Siding regulaclons shall not ba Sncluded in she compute cion of such private ap¢n epau; and (3) Thac the private ownership and main cenanee et the open space Ss adequately prow id ed fo[ by yr is ten agreement; and ,- lit Thu ens a of the p[lve ce open space fa eec[ICt¢d to[ park ens tecr¢eciona iepatpaeae by [eiJrda.::cyanantG ph lch run with she land In fever o[ the future owners of ehe prop arty w ithln the cce<t; and _• Ora lnence Ho. 105 Page 6 (a) That cha proposed pclvoce open apme la reasonably edapcable for me For park and re<tea Clonal purposes, caking into cone id eracfan each far con as size, abpe, topography. {solo{y, access and location of the privan open apace land; aM ' (fl '[Aar Fwilleiea proposed foe the open apace an Sn aube cantfal aeeordaoee uleh the provlalane of the recto clonal eleNnc o[ chs general plan, aM av approved by cha PLmini Cv,~in ion. S<ccion d, 6sen [tone. Tha piovlslom o[ this Ordtnena do r :at apply co caa.eceial or SMascrial subdivisions; nor do they apply en cwMawiniw projm4 vbicA enrolee of the aubdlvlsfon gf elopers In an aab cin6 apu amt building vhtch !a wan tNn five (P) yore old vhm ,w nau dve111n{ anlu are added. Secclon 5. Swecabiltrv. t( any aubseceion, auhd SVlalon pacagnph, sentence, clause er ph[aaa Sw cM ordinance, v[ trey pore cherev[, L (oe any canon hold to Oe invdid or vncoro cl to tiorot, auvM1 decision shall rear •f[ect eM validity of the rew ining tee [tone v[ pot [loos vE chit crdironce or any parr thereof. The Cicy Council herebq decLCed chat is Vwuld Nn paned each section, eubam civn, aubd ivfaiwn, P+raeuph, ventencq <Luee oc phuu of [Ala ordinance Sereapee cave of the fact chat any one oc won aeetione, rvbaection. mbd1v1a1oro, paregrapha, smueeu, clmese or phurea wy be declared invalid or uncorocl tutlonal. Section 6, flucnmt. The 14yor shill sign this ocdlroncc aM cha City Clark still occur to cha an, and cha C1q Clerk aAdl came the sea [o bs publLhed Vlthin fl[uen (15) days after iu puwge, •[ Luc ono 1n Tha Daliv Report, a ndepaPU of geneul clrculacion, publfahW 1n cha City of Oncacio, and circulated Sn the Glcy o[ Poncho Cuuworoa. PA88 ED APPPDYED, aM ADOPTED chL 4th day of June, 1980. AYES: gr Sdge, Mikals, Frpe e, ScAlosaec i l NOES: Ibne AgBENT: Palubo Ph111 D. Schlvu er, Meyvr ATiESi Lauren M. Hesaennan, Ciry Clerk L ORDINANCE N0. 105-A AN ORDtNANC£ OF PIE CITY COVNCtL OF tt1E Citt OF RANCHO CUCMgNGA, CALIPOpN IA, AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 105. (~' The Llry Cauncll of eh< Clcy of Rancho Cammenga, Giifprnia, I deco erdaln a tallove: SECTION 1: Sac ciao J-F o[ Ordinance No. 105 is hereby auMea a Eellovac C "Pack and Re<reaci<ul Land Cr`dit Ear Planned touuniciea. vnaw Drlvaca open apau fo: park nM recr a cimnal Darpmaa Sa provided In < punned coeeunity and pv¢Sero e[ a all each apace la co ba yavuely awned and utncained by cha future realdmo o[ the planned cacnunlcy or publicly dM icacN and utncaiud by • apa<Sal uaesmenc diacricc. credte agaiuc ehc cequ4menc of dedicaeien for park and recreaclonal purposes, a sec Eor[h Se Bection 3-L abll be deurmined through Ma adoption of the planned community c<xc prow Sded, povever, CMe cha park a caM erd [or uld planned <omunlty Sa cha name a Esr any ether dmvelopmenc aM chat cha Planning Cmalsafon f1:Ma Sc is Sn [he public lntareac to do ao, aM chat cha following aca:Marda ate met:" gECLtON 3: All oche[ pmrclona of @dinanc< 105 ahould'seuin Sn full torte and eEEen t. EECtION J: The Nayor aM 11 atgn Mta 0[dlnance and the Clcy C1<ck shall caws the eau to be publlahed vithln flECeen (15) tlaya a[eer Sea paeug< at leas[ once in ILG Oa11Y °°^^.r. • ntvepaper of gmenal eirculaefon publlahad in the L4 cy at Oscar le, California, mnd circulated in the CSty o! Rancho Cucamonga, CdlEarnia. PAgSED, APPROY60, and AOOPTEO [hie 18th day o[ Juna, 1990. AYES: Freac, Mlkela, Painmbo, Bridge, Bchlaaaet NOES: Nana Phil p 0. 5<hloaser, Nayar '~ At:E9t: Lauren N. Nasne rnan, Cl[y Clerk L OODINANCE N0. 105-8 AN aROiNA NCE OF THE LITI CDp11C IL OP TIIE CITI OF RANCgO CUCAEgYGA, CALIFORNIA, M1MENpING CHAPTEfl 16.72 OF TIIE flANCNO LULAMONGA MUNFCIPAL CODE RELATING TO PARR AND RECREATION LAND, INLLUDINO SAVINGS PROVISIONS. ~, ~ 'Inc Clty Council of the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga, does ordain as fal SeNa: SECTION 1: Chapter 16.32 of the Poncho Cucamonga Munlclpal Code Sa hereey amentletl Dy awnding Sectimn 16.32.010 to read as [ollova: "Sectlon 16.32.010. Intent and General PrOVlelOea• "The intent m( thla chapter la tv provide for the developmen[ of park and rocreational faoilitiea through eubdlviaion regulations, In an area vnere Che need for roaldential me, anali, as a coeW SClon Co the approval of a tentative mop, parcel mop, planned mmrnlty, lan0 develppwnt or real entaG dewlopwnt, dedicate lands or pay fen Sn lleu thereof, or • comDlnation o! Dotn, for nalghborhood aM community Dark m crwtlowl purDOaea. Iand to sa tlafy dee Station requlrementa shall be conveyetl to the CSty at the Limo of recordation of Me Iinal map ar parcel mop. In lieu fees one 11 be paid Co the City Drlor Co the laawnre rr N!11a,_a ~ -___a, gF.CTZON 2. 4`la peer 16.12 of Che Rancho Cucamonga Nunleipal Cotle Sa he reay amended by adding Subeac Lion J to Sectlon 16.32.020 to road as follaxe: "(J) No CNahstand ing any other provlalona Sn tnia chapter to the contrary, for tentative wpa and parcel wpa ~~~ ::~ eyy, V,eu al er wCember ]1, I`JO[ Ehe amount of land Vd edicated or Ceeav paSd shall De booed upon Ehe residential dev Sty, Nhich shall De determSned on Che Deals of the approved or [ontlSClonally approved • Cen tative map or parcel mop and Che average h0usehole size mN shall Uv the yrvyCrtlCnatc amount ncceaaaq to provlda threw ecrm of park area Der one thousand person realding N1th In ouch subdivinton, Far the purposes of applying the formula found Sn ,aubsecttan F of Chia aectlan to such aubdlvfs tons, 5 equals Cnree and P shall De the average size of each class of aouseh old Nlthln such aubdlvlalon. If any such eubd ivla SOn coma ins more Shan one class of household, a separate computatlen using the formula 1n aubsectlon F of this Sectlon shall De wtle for each claaa of household elthin such su bdlvlalon and the 'miniwm fee' far the separate ca lcula bona aha 11 De added together Eo determine the minimum fee for the suDdlvision as a Nhole for Ehe porno.. nr d<tr~mintng dedication requtreaents.^. ___ _ ptcr IE.72 - :ha Oa ra hD Cucamonga Nunlelpai Cod< Ss M1ereby amended by adtling Eubaectlon •G to 9ectian 16,32.030 to read as fo aova: "(C) Planned develoDm<nb and real estate developmen[s ea dell ned In Sections 11003 and 11003,1, respec Lively, of the Callfarnla Business and Prr'e m ions Code, aha 11 ba ellg lble to receive a credit, Sn an amount date rm load by resolution of Me Cl ty Comwll, agalnat Che amount of land requlnd to Da dad Seated, or Che amount of ord Lnance No. 105-g Page 2 the fea Seryosed, pursuant to this chapter, far the value of private open apaaa within the devaloPmmnt Mich la mxDla for active recreational uses, ihla au DSectipn shall apply only to planned deve lopxnta and real estate developxnm for wh lch ten[atlve ma pa'er parcel mom are aPProVed or condlt tonally approvetl after December 3t, 1982. The credit allowable pursuant to this auDSecClon shall, Sf applied tor, Da In lieu of anY other credit allowable antler ocher Drov Salons of Chia chapter.^. SECTION Y: Nothwithstending any other provision of State lav or ord lnance or reao lutlon pf the Cl ty of gaucho Cummonga, to the event of f1na1 Jud is lal datermination that any fee or dedlcatlon roquirement Smppaed Dy Chapter 16.32 of the Rancho Cucamonga MunlclDal Code, either a St eslatetl prior Co tha affecClve date of thin ord lnance, or u' axnded by this ordlnanme, la Sn excaaa of the maximum permitted Dy gta to law, such (ea or dedlcatlon requtrewnt, or Doth, shall Da daened reduced to and f1xeJ at the maxlmun quart tlty or amount that tha Court determ into might have Deen IawN lly imposed py the City puruant to an ordina:rce adopted under the authority of Callfornla Cavcrnaent Code SecClon 66477. °-- - - --_ ..w. nmalarsa thaE SE ww ld Mve atloptetl this Ordllunce~and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof Srreapec Give of the he[ :hat any e r more sections, suDaectlona, senlmcea, clones, ph rases or portion thereof Da declared 1nva110 or uncam LStutSOm 1, then all other provisions thereof cell remain Sn Cali [ores and afeent. SECTION 6: IDe Mayor shall sign Ch1a OrdSnence and the City Clerk shell attest to Lfie same, and the C1ty Clerk shall cause the can to be Da L1Y Report,. • newspaper of general circulation, Dubll shed ~Sn tM C1 Ey of UII Lerlu, lallt'OrOla, UIN cll'lu laLCJ 111 Lllc C1LY OI' IIn11uIlO L'umep118+• PASSED, APPROVED, one ADOPTED this tat day of Dacemberr 1982. RTES: Dahll Suquet, Schlosser, Frost, Mikela NDE$: None ABSENT: None `~ Jan lkela, Mayor ATTEST: ~e.L.~..-_~~Lui2w - L a'La en M. Naeaerman, Ctty Clerk ORp[NAIICB N0. 105-C AN OMINANCL OF TX6 CtTf OP RANCHO COCANOtICA, WLIPOMIAr ANfAD111C gV{ggCTtON G AND F OP gECTItA1 16,72.0]0 OP SNE RANCHO CIICAMONCA NUNIC [PAL CODL REWTTVB t0 PAR[ AND RLCRCATIONAL I.td[D 06DIGT!ON ggQUtAEMLNTg I fie Clq Couu ll a[ the Cf [y of Raneho Cuemonp, GLlfoenL, dom 1 ordain x follow: _ Benelon 1[ 5ubxe[lan C of Bm [ion 16.]2.010 of [M1a Nneho Cuemanm i Nunlelpal Coda L hapby xendad x [ollova: ~ ^C[M 1[ f0[ ~rivq Opm space" i Imex pr data opm spas (or park and ncrea[laxt vurpoaea la provided fn • p[opoaad aubdfv to ion, and aurM1 apace is [o De prlva rely owed and malnplvd by CM1a [acute realdenea of the mbd lvL ion, aucM1 vua say be redtted agalva[ nme note [hen [t[q percent (SOS) a[ eha wqulCmaoC o[ dad lca[Son aM dodopen[ for park ud erx clon Durposo, a xc torch In [hie ar[lclaa ve [M payment el [ed In rlleu [hereof, ae ae[ torah he nln, p rmvided eha Plawin6 Cox/x len [lode R la In eha public in4na[ [o dv ao, ' and [haC eM (olloving sexduda ua xe: (t) Tha[ yards, court • ua, xebuka and actor open area raqul pd cm ba ma lnulnad by [ha zmnln{ aM rbu lid ln{ peoriafeea vt CM1Ia lode atoll not ha included in eh< eoapu uclan at aucb prlvap span spas; and (2) Tlu[ [ha prfvato owenM1lp aM xin[snance of cM open apace la adagwnly provided for by vrle nn •{cement, end (7) Thu the vu nl rb ~_ .eta oven apace L natrletad [mr park and - umnal purDOa ea by ncordad eovmmu vh1<h run vl[h CM land In Eaver a[ th<`nalntlnR and Prrnrr n a( prnprn y vlrnln rLn nnlxl lr In ion nml ^L luh j cannot De det a [ed ac eLLminae<d vl[hou[ qu cone<nc of [he Counvltp and (5) Thac the proDmed pr lust[ opm apace La removably adaptable (or use ter Dark and rev reactoxl purpvasa, tak log Ln to eons /dose ion ouch faeton u size, shape, to po8caphy, Geology, encase and location o[ the prlwce open apace lane; and i (5) Th+t facll Lt lea proposed for [he open ague are In subacsn[Ll accordance vlth tM1a pmvla tone of the tee rea[/an end parka elmanC o[ eha ~ general pLn Eor [he CI[y and ue approved by eha Planning Cnxfm ion; and i (6) Thac the min Low open apace tar vh leh cred It vl1L De cone lde ttd fa cM1 [ea «rea and prov ld ea a atnlmun of four o[ [M1e elemen[e I)s tad D<lov, or ' onD lne[lon o[ auvh, and other reereaefonQ imp rovmend [M1ae viii xec the ' epee e[le rec reatlon park need[ of [he [u tu[e [ea id ants of the area: '~ Cr (tarts Lla[ ~~ A. Ch ttd ra n'a play apparatus j B. Pav lly herbece< ptentc aces '~ C. Game cvua area 0, gvln pool vlrh ed ]scan[ deck and ant llllary fee Lllelea ~. rec reatlon Dullding The eu bd lv ider requescll ng <onaldera[lon tar pelvete open space cred l[ shell, as pare of the subs it tai tiling, /nclud e: 1. N[lecen request [or such cone ideration Dy the "mooing Cosmlaalon; and Mo. IOS-C Page 1 2. SuDelc de[a tied plena and apes ltluclona [or acme and Lprovmenu wtchln ouch propoeed prlvace open ePace. 3Te planning Camlaslon aM ll, a an elevnc o! cne ro!<w for prlvace opev apace crad lt, ao llc it eorenca and recoomdatlom !rm the Pack Oevelepvant eombelov on all even applfu [Sono. Se<clov 2: Subaacclon P of Sec[lon I6.32.0]0 of ehe Ramho Cucaonq• Nuvicipal Coda Sa Mraby meMed ae tollove: 'Credit eor hbace Open space - tlemW Co~,ulclm^ Nhao prlvace open apace Eor part and n<rmcloml purpoaea la provided Ina ptanned commcity and pocc:ona o[ ail each apace la co Da privaealy owned and mintainad Dy eM Eueuw naldenn of the pLnnad co~unlcy publicly dedica tad and valncalned Dy a spec Lt uwaaseve dka cclec, credit yfpsc cne reyulremnc of dedlca[ lan foe park and recrcaclonal parpoaav, as sec torch In seeelon 16 J2.020 C aMil De detamined cnrovgn the adopclon of the planed covamnSty urq provided, however, chat the pack ad:ulard !or tM pbnosd comunlq la tM sue es Eor any otMr develo peens and eMC the plannln6 co~lea ion E1Ma lc la In cM public incenac co do ao, and clot tM acaMarda to[ prSVau opm apace, as set [a cth In S«clov !6.71.0]0 L, ace vet. sa<[lon ]: All ocner port lone of Ordinan<• !OS shall rem in 1n full tome andi[[ac% secelon 6: me !Lyon shall •lgn [h Se Ordlmme and ehe Cl cy Clerk mall ca • the wawa co be m,Dl la hed wlcAin tl[[mn (ISJ day..ECec '.: po up •c lea coon . !~ ?+.- •- ~ rc a newspaper of Bev tai cl cc ul¢len publtaMd Ln ens Cityrof Onearlo,• : ¢nta, and elreula eed to the Clq eE gkncM Cucasovga, GliEamb. PASSeq, APPgOygq, .nd ApOpigD chla let dq of Augm e, 19q{. AYES: Nrlghc, su9v<c, Mlkela, Oahl, Ring NOES[ ryone AeseNT: None L }an b. Mike la, Nayot A1'rEST: ~/ Beverly A. Au[heiet, Cl[y C erk i ~. .:':1 ~ .: li:.;1 4 . .. ~. ., .. i .... .. i ,a ~.. .. ..._ .. ,1... c11.' ...,. i:i!g ;YI:•4. R:.tci'~o u!:On~c ::G 1, i;cr,;. --T RESOLOT:OR N0. 83-9 A RESOLVIIOtl CP TRR CITE COVIIC:L OP THE CSTS OP OANCRO COCA[16NC1, CILIFOPA2A, ESTSgLLSRII$ 1YEAAC6 C0.4T PEA ACRE TD DE4ELOP PlA[ LAMD IR gAgC80 COCANDRCA 11gEREAS, CRe CStT fqumll of the City of Raw~dm Cucamonga, Callfornla, Na +tlopced maDtar 16.32 at eBa Nuvlclpal Cpda, re Lating to rcgulatloaa for dedlcaclon of land, DayDmnc of hen, or bean, for D+rk and rcareatioml land io auodlyia imm and pliraed a~nuvitlea; ene YAEREAS, Chapter 16.32 of cbe Nunlclpnl Coda aatablianea a for~la rayuYlog as a component, "(CRa) abroga Dmc par acre Co davalop Dark land as da Urninad by tRe DuD11c aganoy; SRE.4EFOPE, BR R tl0w RESOLyEp Dy Cna City Comc11 of Che CSty of Pincho CLCamrya as follwa: 1, Teat tRa CSty Gomcll shall deteralna ud at DT Raao lutlon the avarap aoac par acre tp davalop Dark lapel In Rancno Cucamory{a; and 2. IDat tea Clq Council shall rbiaw and ad}uat by Aa aolut:gn, Man warrweea, tna coat to QneloP Dark land In RaneF.e Cucaannasa; sad 3. Tna anraga coat par care to davalop park land in Rancho Cucamvrya la narwy aacaDliahaa ae Parcq Eighe Tnmuaand Dollars (Sue,000), and 1e is cnae ligun of Forty Eignt Thousand Dollars gaE,000) per aen tnae vtil apply 1n cne appL'eac!on of Cap ur 16.32 of ebe lLnie!Dai Coaa. Y. Tha average cast Dar acre to davalop park land as Qaterminad by tRta Maolucimn aML` apply t0 CMeative maps or Darml maps, approved or oondit!onLLly approved, an or after January t, 19a3• Ana av n'ro• - - v.~en Dark land Cor Cenucive ppa or pareai papa approved pr!or to Jarwry 1, 1983 aha:: hw as set Corcn :n ReaoluLlmn ;k. 80 +5: PASSEC, APPflOYID, and ADGPTED thla 5tR any of January, 1983. AFS: Dahl, Buduec, 3eRleaaar, MSkala NOES: Frost SBSEN :: Nona G. 4lkela, ;ayor AC: EST: i ~ ~~ ' wren M. 'aaaaaro•n, CSty Clar~_ - 6PSp1p2xw 60. 63-10 A a6wunxp6 a tRe c2x councxi eP SRE cm aP RAxc6p COCAIgtlOA, CAfSNRL, 65TABCIS6LY0 POPOSa2I06 PER OY8I.LINO UMIT POR 186 PORl036 OP 83PLFM1lfZ6C CSfAP'fE8 16.32 G 186 t6IYICIPAL 0006 681,ASLRO TO 1'tlE OEOZCSSxOd OP PAR 160 6CC84TIOY fJtlO vRRUS, tn• est> Cownu of en• eier or Rancho anavnega, Catifornla, baa uoDt•d CaapGr 16.3z or w Municipal ease, .ra'_atL'a :n feaulauene far dedication pt land, pa>s•ne ¢t h•a, er DotR, Cor parK and r•enaeioul lend N r~DdlAaiepa and planned deeminlCiu; and YI®16A3, Cnapcer 16.32 0l CR• Mwlcip+l Coda ncaplianea a formlla r•puirln{ w a eavpavme, "(eeel Dopulaclon par avelllu6 upit on • aeale amd a.mur a•c er N• r.avoosiDle pnnlln a6•mcr•, wa 41p016A6, Stan ]av, dlectiw Je¢wq 1, 1963. r•eulrea coat popuLtlon atspoeeeea employed io Dar![ dedieaeion toraulaa, auto as CRat emntatned vlchlm Cnepter 16.32 of Ne Municipal Coda, W nfleeuve of the •evera6e alto of eacn elaaa of howMela• R> tAe spat recmG Federal er State cenaw MS¢n diacloaea auto Lltore.Clan: 1RGROR, 66 R NaD RESOLyED Dr the City Cew¢L1 of cM CSLy or Randnn dlcamn6a, fAllfornia as rOlldYa: 1. Snat the Cicp Cawe!1 anal! determine and aae Dy naolue!en [ne oeram• DopuAtion for ucn clafa of hewenold Daaed upon ene moat cacao[ Fu•ral or Stau tendon dlxloaing au<n 1:.[oraa c!en: ane 2. :..at Eta CSbI Gu:.e!1 atria nvieu and •d3uae, Dy Seaolueion, Lt wrrancu, cn• poDUlatloD for eacn [lane at Rawuold as nviua Pueral er Suee emaua intormtion Sa laaued; and 3. IDaC the avera¢e oenulattnn fnn use ~ •+• Pancho Cucason6a, par We 9caG Ospar:a•nt at F!:.ance Spacial Gnaw of ADr11 0l 1979, la •acaDilaned as tollova: A. SingA Fpaaly Detaenad pepulatlon par w1c la 3•u3 panom; B. LLplea r•aidaniial acrvccur• populaelon tar Bann wu contained CR•nin Sa eacaeiLaRea ae 2.D3 peradna; C. h!pl•x ruldenLia3 acrvcewe Dopula Clon far each wLt edncalned CRenia la eaeaDilaned ac 2.29 panona: p. Paurplu rsaidueial acrueLwe population for eacn unLE cancalned cMnln la •acaDllaned ac 2.75; fi. Multi-[daily naidutLai atrvccuraa conealnlne 5 Lo 9 realdantLl wlta par acrucwn, nu •ataDllaned a populatiw tar ucn unit contained ct•rem of LSZ peradna; F. !611[1-faaily reaidemtlal acrvoturea cdnuining 10 er more raa!der.al win par Yrutturs Ran uub:ianed a poDUlatlpn tar vacp unit conwinq tnveln of 1.53 Deraem. paoletim 8p. 93-18 Pap 2 IDla Maolutioa shall he appllcaDla Co caloulacle~ the oediuciop of Led,palrnt of has, or DaN, for park spa newatl.oeal idea as reeulraC 01 Chapter 16.32 pf tea tLelcipal Goa, [er tae4ciee spa x parcel e•Da - apprvaeo m m agar Javuarl t, 1983. feetitlw v.pa cr parcel oopa apprvwe Drior to or m Dwaahar 31, 1982, vill Cag1Y uit6 aalat3os Lu Chap fa Dlaee ae the CSM aa0 apDrowl ws eraptao. lA888P, 1PP6hy®, am aDOP'fID Chia 5th oay of Javuary, 1983. AySS: Pahl, Buawt, Schlosser, lroat, NSkaL 8085: 8ope 1BSE8y: 8me . Mtkela, Hayor A11YSy: /~~ fa~V'~r~e, City Clera VNEST' VENTURE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY September 10, 2987 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Easeline Road Rancho CUcamorga, CA 91730 Re: Tract 13476 -City Cowcil Appeal September 16, 1987 CQntlemen: On the referenced tract the planning commission has required the undergmundircg of the poles on Hellman in front of our tract. To canply with this, we must underground from the first pole on ti9e south side of Tryon St. to the f --t Lain to the Werth of the tract, a total diatanee of approximately 950 feet. We have contracted 50. Cal. Edison as to the cost since they will be doiig the work, and we were told it would cost S275 per foot plus engineering, etc. That would briig the cost to over 5275,G00, FLrther, Edison would not give us a date for installation since small jobs do not receive any priority. V OLUVLV .JL IJ,VVV VVCL J/ aVIO \J /,'~Vi eFl i llr weconanical along with all the other conditions the City now insists on and will force us to abandon the project. Please note that in the conditions it is pointed out that the opposite aide of the street is developed and there can be no rei cement of any costs. 'Ibis 9t acre tcact is an infill development along Hellman, a street that has been substantially Wilt up for years. The balance of the street will probably never be undergrounded and the portion represented by our tract would be insignificant. We propose that in lieu of urc3ergrounding our tract, we pay an amount of 52,000 per lot or $74,000 to the City of Rancho ^.:comc:g~ to ux ir. a mere ~dV3.^.tagM6'.°. place such as Yfiere new 5900 SEPULVFDA BOULEVARD ~ SUITE 904 ~ VAN NUVS, CALIFORNIA 8941 ^. • (B1 BJ 908-9605 „ .i City of Random Cucamonga September 10, 1987 Page 2 developnent has left pockets of lines to the undergrourded, or M~ would like to suggest the money be used as a beginning of a fund that someday would be used to underground all of Hellman Ave. and not just a few hundred feet within several miles. If the foregoitg is not possible then as an alternative we submit the enclosed pictures for your review. We propose an extensive decorative landscape plan along Hellman Ave., with large specimen trees, mature planting along with a decorative slumpstone wall. the landscape mould be for in excess of that normally required by the City. We feel that would do a great deal to beautify the street until Same time in itc f:.,_~_-,.i yen the entire strnet could 6e done. We are willing to do our share to maintain the standards of the City and these proposals are in the spirit of working with the City to acmnplish its goals in a sound and reasonable manner. Very truly( y~urs,A ~~/~ l~C-li~`.~~e~' -X Lou Berkowitz LBjmh encl. "~-}fH- ~~ -i :~v N y ~- R+~ - ~ qfl to tJ~- ~ o-~-~ z~ u,'~,...~ ~ A.i,~ ~-rx.a~ u~ ~-Gu-~ , ~U ~- a rvw~.. I ,, ~/ ~ ~ ~ ~~Yl'~ ~,~ML ''J2 C-~r~.. 1 ni ~~'~~ ~.. -~ ~- - ~- ~~ 1'~- ~: Page 1 of JSS .~> 7U,.r PETITION ~n~~ J`'~~'4 / the undersigned residents of Uplund and Rancho Cucamonga aYe united ..st the proposal to route Red Hill traffic (via Alta Cuesta) through to .ova Ave. for a number of reasons: (1) the already heavy traffic flow coming up Crove (2) the unusually high incideneQ of traffic accidents on N. Grove (3) Chet, we feel, this proposal would not solve Red Hill's problem; but, increase the traffic flow. Furthermore, we the undersigned feel that options such as closing off access, installing speed bumps; or more practically, installing a center divider on Foothill (East of Grove) would do far more Co discourage traffic flow through Red Hill than any other options. ADDRESS SIGNATURE DATE (PRINTED) NAME i n ~~ ~. UPA \t f L ~ Ski ``!YI ti ~ x.' l'iE r-. ,~ _.i ,u/. iJ.:; : / ~ ~ ~ ~ +--~ S Yn as oi< hiG Wt Gr. ~3ondur 1`{by ~omw. Sold Cou,~, ,(U~.~4.~ee.u~ ~'~.~- /4~ ~ n ~ ' ~ r R, ~ i A 4~r~ m y ,~3,~~m~ A~C-~ ~. r i ~ rvi, . ra,-rui l~a'sr~~, i_nm~ t~ ~,~,_.14 .. ._ ~ 'cti~~u..t ~SS 'sal l.3I3 71~/ z- CG ,, ~,~~T.i~.I.7..J-~Fl hl /L77 r~ 2 l E I ~ ~ ' a '~ . 9- /l - ~> ~_i,_~~ „_ , ~ ,_~~_ j '.n - -~- -~3-s-7 ~~/~~ 7. C1I ~_ Ss7 _^/~^+'7 ~J- /3 Y' ~~ r„ .. ,~ -r /3'%' Si ;~u It ~~-,~ ~~, r ~ e~~ t it w~.,lt i~_ ~. 9/~-r/RBI v Alta Cuesta s u p Red •Hill Country Club I)r:' Proposed realignment of Alta Cuesta Remember the next council meeting: 6:00 PM, Sept 16 Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga .~,_~- Page 2 of PETITION > We the undersigned residents of URland and Nancho Cucamonga aTe united against the proposal to route Red Hill craffic (via Alta CuesCn) through to trove Ave, for a number of reasons: (1) the already heavy traffic flow coring up Grove (2) the unusuallq high incident of traffic accidents on N. trove (3j Chet, ve Feel, this proposal would not solve Red Hill's problem; but, increase the traffic flow. Furthermore, we the undersigned feel that options such es closing off access, ina[alling speed bumps; ar mare practically, ins[alling a center divider on Foothill (East of Crova) wou1J du far more to dlscournge traffic flow through Red Hill than any other options. trnan+cw/ nnnc nuunnoa aaunn+unc enac ~.t/ !~, / .A MAMA«T c L ~ j/~--~ ~ c fUi `~ ~~- gbbt~ l%/a, I'7arccR-- ~~ Page 3 of 13- PETITION 'T the undersigned residents of Upland and Rancho C -.gat the proposal to route Red Hill traffic ..rove Ave. Fora number of ucamonga are united cooing up Crove reasons: (via Alta Cuesta) through Co N. Crove buC) tha[?)wahfeelusua llyp`oPosal would enoy heavy [accidents oon problem; , increase the this traffic Furthermore traffic flow, t solve Red Hill's access, inatellin we the undersigned feelp=acticall R off divider on Foo[hi Bl speed bumps; or more Ptions such flov through Red Hi13East of as closin Crove) would do far y' installing a center then any other options, more to discourage traffic (PRINTED) NAME ADDRESS G AT E ~~:77 nn-., ~ ~ tih DATE ~' / PETITION Page 4 of-}~ Me the undersigned residents of Upland and Rancho Cucamonga are united against the proposal to route Red Nill traffic (vin A1[a Cuestn) through to Crove Ave, for a number of reasons: (1) the already heavy traffic flow coming up Grove (2) the unusually high incident of Creffic accidents on N. Grove (3) Chet, we Feel, this proposal would not solve Red Hill's problem; but, increase the Craff is flow. Furthermore, we the undersigned feel that options such as closing off access, installing speed bumps; or more practically, installing a center divider on Foothill (East of Crove) would do far more Co discourage traffic flow through Red Hill than any other options. l oorumcn~ J C - ~~~ ~~ ~UUKCJJ SIGNATURE DATE Cs •~-~F.Qa 9-Jo-d C~~~'ICJJbJ `/- ~t~lCG3 /I s~ ~L~hrA s'c~ ,~~t4 ~.. 1 // '/LO s~ .!y -/ d •d yy~/ , G cEx 9 /a-~ 7 ~ ,/ ~' ~ f'I 'y ~ ,/,~ ~-/~ f _ /" ~' i 'I ~ ~ Lb ~ \, // ' _ ~ , r% - C4r, r ' ~ ~.1 +' / ~ ~~~ ' , /. , , . ~ ~ 11~' , V1~ ^ ~ ~ ~ ,r V ~ - ~ . / a ~ ','~` v / - mac„ ~.i~, Cf'.,~r~; / ''<'% ~ C f , /. ~GJ .X l)ks. - rt E~~ ,7 / ~~L'SS« r /Y 'SOJ/ /O-~" / ' /~ l ~ c~ r/!. / ;is8 ucma `7cfcz , r, I r ;~ (~z 'ill. ~'~rraa - a -~ 1~~~ ~c ' ~ . 7 ar ~~. -! f r >7 >] 7 7 .~' ,~i.? /' ` .~ Page 5 of,23 PETITION Ne the undersigned residents of Upland and Rancho Cucamonga are united against the proposal to route Red Hill traffic (via Altu Cuestu) Uirough to trove Ave, for a number of reasons: (1) the already heavy traffic flow coming up Grove (2) the unusually high incident of traffic accidents on N. trove (3) [hat, we feel, Chia proposal would no[ solve Red Hill's problem; but, increase the traffic flow. Furthermore, we Che undersigned feel that options such as closing off access, installing speed bumps; or more practically, installing a center divider on Foothill (East of trove) would do far more to discourage traffic flow through Red Hill than any other options. r oorwmcn~ - ~~~ 11UUKGJS SIGNATURE DATE r', I ~ 33 i. ~a ~ C.UCN wl',it(~ l~,~~ 1V~ ('i2 VG a (~!1~'i,rr•,,, 1i1 ~ _o _~ //IC,C'V ;'/r_~t- ,~!/if: 13d: 7 /Y G C %E /1~ Y': ~T1 t't ~%~./'~,~Y4~c % ~ /Y ~ / r ~ ~ - L' ,~ Fi. ^ ~~ t ~~ _ ~ ~:~~ ~ fl ~ lY--~ .~ ~ ' r 1~ ~ - c;• hi /i,~ :,,, is i i n F~u~t ~~.~ --Itr... ~,., ~; - ' - ~~ iy ) .. ;; ~. e / i J f ~_ ~ ~ l • • R / / > _ v ~/ ~~ ~ f r ~ . / ~:o~, ~ ~~T r . / )a. . -~/ / / .r,. y. / „0 ~ ~k 9 J II , ~ '~ ~i :~' J~.4. ~~. ~ ~ )~ _y7 'f''~'.~ ni i ~,'..~' /% ~ /987 ~~ i /~ r• r 17 .' { "i If._ i~ (~/ Page 6 of L7 PETITION Ne the undersigned residents of Upland and Rancho Cucamonga are united against the proposal to route Red Hill traffic (via Alta Cuesta) through [o trove Ave, for a number of reasons: (1) the already heavy traffic flow coming up Grove (2) the unusually high incident of traffic accidents on N. trove (3) that, we feel, this proposal would not solve Red Hill's problem; but, increase the traffic flow. Furthermore, we the undersigned feel that options such as closing off access, inatelling speed bumps; or more practically, ins[alling a center divider on Foothill (East of trove) would do far more to discourage traffic flow through Red Nill then any ocher options. ~•^-^•~~i nuurce55 SIGNATURE DATE „~ ~7 ~ , ,.,,. ~ I , ,. ~ N J ~'~ ~ ~ _ i -~ ,, n ~~; ~ ' ty~ / /G -? ~I~iJln, ~ LLL1~ l`~.Z .~ ti' C-r~~~k tl p( fd/.x .~~ ~-CNL~ `j-/0 'd / ~ r . ~f ~ ., ,, - ,, -~ ,~ ~ _ ~ _ ' ,,~ -~ ~ ~ > . U ~ ~n, ,. ,,_ , ~ , _ ~/A. ~. r %' ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ r, ,. '~' .,,._ .1:~ ~ .. ~iI ~ • ~ , it I'~ Ib v ... Li ~i'.,, ,~ 4'' _ i~~* ~r ,.rl' ~' , 'r, (+ - y - ~ ..., o P . f. % ~, < .! ~ , .rt~Nlr2L• ~i - ~ /Y,m N. iii `~q y _~ ~~' ~ ~-i:~t ~~+' ~'~,~,. 4'•. j 1. i ~ . I l ,yu P ~• ~ ~f. ~'t % f3 ~ ~ [ ~._ (/r~ ~~~ ' ~ rd: .G_'1 ~'J~e,c{~ti r/, / ., ~ ~ , 7- ; %~y -~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ ~~ , k C c~ '7 ,!~ t~~ >~ 7 S~ 7 J r 7 PETITION Page 7 of X3 ' Me the undersigned residents of Upland and Rancho Cucamonga are united ~legainat the proposal to route Red Nill traffic (via Alta Cuesta) through to ~"~Grove Ave. for a number of reasons: (1) the already heavy traffic flow coming up Grove (2) the unusually high incident of traffic accidents on N. Grove (3) Chat, we feel, this proposal would not solve Red Hill's ,,problem; but, increase the traffic floe, :~~ Furthermore, ve [he underslgned feel that options such as closing off C access, installing speed bumps; or more practically, installing a tenter divider on Foothill (East of Crove) vould do for more to disc uurugu U'u(f lc -~ flow through Red Hill than any other options. G ~E C c ~~~ ~~ nnc nuurtcaa S1GRA'Z'URE DATE / flv~ ~~d l,.L~ 9-l~ s~ ~~~ - l O '~ ' tc uc '7 cYt GC -~~- ~. f7 A ~ E. '~~ C/FYflivJ~ ~ ''/Gf / ~c Lr. i'~ CGttiz / 'LULL- I 1(s e.t[l > / ), a 9/~~/,~7 >;a I i9'' - C+ (.~ . ~I i1~7~r<~rt~ ~a_/tr 41u a ~ 7 _ d ,c i -, ~, ~~ ~„ ~ i4~RGaFI ~t:hru`~c~ ~3 E, 13/t~5~u Iqa! ~ ,~c..F- ( `'"°` <)i38 l 1~° ~ ~~~, i~~~~, ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ /r c. ~i „(CIS(nn, kSq, rru -..._ _ i5 r,~ A~.TA :?"i~ '~ ~ /,~~~ "/Y~ . / ~, ~ ; ~..z R ~~. tgdd ~ ~ S~~ t ~ -,~ '' ar ~ ~ , F v 7 7 77 7 , :7 7 7 ~- ~ 7 l 7 PETITION Page 8 of 13 We the undersigned residents of Upland and Rancho Cucamonga are united against the proposal to route Red Nill traffic (via Alta Cuesta) through to Crove Ave. for a number of reasons: (1) the already heavy traffic flov cooing up Grove (2) the unusually high incident of traffic accidents on N. Grove (3) [he[, we feel, this proposal would not solve Red Hill's problem; but, increase the traffic flow. Furthermore, we [he undersigned feel [hat options such as closing off access, installing speed bumps; or more practically, installing a center divider on Foothill (East of Crove) would do far more to discourage tra[Eic flow through Red Nill than any other options. ~..,.n...wi , nu Auurt GnJ J1liKAlUKG UATL: ~ ~ a i 1 .~ ~ D .~ ~ .~~/ ~" ~"- ,~ 9-~ 6 ~ C _ ~ ~t / ~ _ E (ism ~ ~ ~; C. ~/~~~ I -~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ` Ci: w e ~ t4 ~k' ~/ - r .i iii/-Nrini r'T ,...ii~j Ai ~nour v.ri- , ii~~~.~=.i "zr. __ $'i~y ~7 7 l 37. 7 ,~ f7 ~7 ~7 ~~ J `~ _, Page 9 of ,13 PETITION Ne the undersigned residents of Upland and Rancho Cucamonga are united against the proposal to route Red Hill traffic (via Alta Cuesta) through to trove Ave, for a number of reasons: (1) the already heavy traffic flow cooing up Grove (2) the unusually high incident of traffic accidents on N. Grove (3) that, we feel, this proposal would not solve Red Hill's problem; but, increase the traffic flow. Furthermore, we [he undersigned feel that options such ea closing off access, installing speed bumps; or more practically, installing a center divider on Foothill (East of Grove) would do far more Co discourage traffic flow through Red Nill than any other options. lrrtanacv~ nnnc nuun wn aawnnaurtn unac ,Yn s 7 / ~ p.~ ~ w Z ~-.4 J -~ ~' s~ ~r Sx. -io •~ AI/en al t!n d ~~ '/7~/ /~.r So! -~a-87 e;nd ~anr/ .l //77 Lomn ~o/a L 9-10-6 (~Aizc L, S .,, 6~c / Lp < ~< <_ // - h• L ~ Wiz. ~ 1, 9-~~-~ 7 Page 10 of 1R', PETITION Me the undersigned residents of Upland and Rancho Cucamonga are united against the proposal to route Red Nill traffic (via Alta Cuesta) through Co trove Ave. for a number of reasons: (1) the already heavy traffic flow coming up Grove (2) the unusually high incident of traffic accidents on N. Grove (3) that, we feel, thin proposal would no[ solve Red Hill's problem; but, inc cease the traffic flaw, Furthermore, we the undersigned feel that options such as closing off access, installing speed bumps; or more practically, installing a center divider on Foothill (East of Grove) would do far more to discourage traffic flow through Red Hill then any other options. trrtinacu~ nnnc nuurtcoa nr~nnaunr. unac r 1p 0 ~i-~o _~_ ~N,aTCi! /30~ ,iu~za sr ~vc,f~o :~ 9-io-87 i ~(~" GYWS O ~Yk/ rJ~. u/'~~ ~-M^s~ q-IR~ l7cvGC.Q s N1. f3, ROSAlL 13 ~ l L oMA Soul AvF !/C<A~ 9- ~ s-g j T - b ~o a i r/a ~ ,; ~, 3e f~ _ q~/v; 7 `d'1 Page 11 of PfiTITION We the undersigned residents of Upland and Raucho Cucamonga are united ~gainet the proposal to route Red Uili troffie (via Alta Cuesta} through to Stove Ave, for a number of reasons: (lj the already heavy traffic tlov eo~ing up Grove (2) the unusually high incident of traffic accidents on N. Grove (3} that, we feel, this proposal would not solve Red Nill's problem; bat, Increase the traffic flow. Furthermore, ve the undersigned feel that options such as closing off access, installing speed bumps; or more practically. installing a center divider on Foothill (East of Cro ve) wuuid du far more to dlacourage traffic floc thraugh Red Nill then any other options. (rarnlGV/ napC IIUVR LJJ J1 VnafUaG UII1G rota ~Mtl ~4saN ~~ (w 1 ..~.». J ~ '/~ "~ o/lE~b "/y/ l 6 t/LI'ru~. S f' Jo .~ ~ / ~ .~ 1`/ l C a ~ `~ ,, 1~ ~~ >, 7 ) Page 12 of 13 PETITION '~~ We the undersigned residents of Upland and Rancho Cucamonga are united against the proposal to route Red Hill traffic (via Alta Cueste) through to Grove Ave. fora number of reasons: (1) the already heavy traffic flow coming up Grove (2) [he unusually high incident of traffic accidents on N. Grove (3) that, we feel, this proposal would not solve Red Hill's problem; but, increase the traffic flow. Furthermore, we [he undersigned feel that options such as closing off access, installing speed bumps; or more practically, installing a center divider on Foothill (East of Grove) would do far more to discourage traffic flow through Red Hill than any other options. i oe •.~mo... °~ auuKn~~ SIGNATURE DATE • } q-I ~q~~ - N /v. VET V o/ p^ 9,~ ~ ~ Sao /~~ 'R~`(/E (/ ~/ c e „L V ~or3en i r.:oo r2 6o L c~ v- T °1- 1 rY/C f ~ e e. ~ `- ~ . ^ ~ , GJ~J. L~r F'C' ) e j-/~ O ~r,;~llil, ~nCD~n-c~ I ~(°~i-~~11~;h.n(( (Prrl 1 ~l ~./// Iii Ir. i ~. , - ~ i ~ ~~ ~ i7 a ., _ ~: ~ "~ r ~! -, ~. ., ~ ' ~. i ei •?. r Li ~-!'t rr' nv (! C.nNi ..,~. ~ ,L ~ i/-A 7 s~ 7 1 I S~ /~ I 7 Page 13 of 13 n' PETITION We Che undersigned [esidents of Upland and Rancho Cucamonga are united against the proposal to route Red Hill traffic (via Alta Cuesta) through to Grove Ave. for a number of reasons: (1) the already heavy traffic flow coming up Crove (2) the unusually high incident of traffic accidents on N. Grove (3) that, we feel, this proposal would not solve Red Hill's problem; but, increase the traffic flow. Furthermore, we Che undersigned feel that options such as closing off access, installing speed bumps; or mare practically, installing a center divider on Foothill (East of Crove) would do far more to discourage traffic flow through Red Hill than any other options. PRI TE A D S D E i N D) N ME AD RE S SIGNATURE AT rle.n~ -~ ~~~~ r Ir M i'1'1~ f > ~~ Vl ~ ( / S E7~1/EJ7 ..., _ n u i~ C/J ~~ ~ r i ~ ~ ~ % h ~ '~ ~ ~ ~~ r .- C / ~ j ! / ~' ~~' 1 ~i~ /.. a'~ ~~~~ r ~ ~ l - ~ ~C-i p ~~/'Y ] ~ l~ /.C~L ivoG E 2 ~ i ~ lu/' l!~ F/ ~/ /' ~~ ms~ss )(~ --y ~ V~jvZ"uM :~r(/~ I `~~7/ ~ r'~r~~ /i ~tL/11~7 `)~ ~~ ~) C~ `. ` ~ ~ r ~AC.rs 1y ar''1r PETITION We the undersigned residents of Upland end Rancho Cucamonga are united against the proposal to route Red Hill traffic (vio A1Ea Cuestu) through to Crowe Ave. fora number of reasons: (1) the already heavy traffic flow cooing up Crove (2) the unusually high incident of traffic accidents on N. Grove (3) that, ve feel, this proposal would not solve Red Hill's problem; but, increase the traffic flow. Furthermore, we [he undersigned feel [hat options such as closing off access, installing speed bumps; or more practically, installing a center divider un Foulhlll (EusC of Cruvu) would du Cur more Lu dlacourugu [collie flow through Red Hill than any other options. f optumrn~ u.uc ____ -°~ ^^ auugESS SIGNATURE DATE a L ~ ^ ~ ~ , a i s o i~ ~s J v q -T ~ ~ - , s/- /n~ G r -~ ' 'f'Y~ ~ o n'L i ,Ui i ,.l Y A oraiArcK ~P~S9 - ~_~~~ S i e w~Tq u . 8'. _ ~ ~ n r 4 ' l (~ R ~, wll~ 0.~'~95,(r ~/V~iC (~i/1~; 7t cj /\fi ` 1: .~ ~ ~ v y-iti-k ~ ill ~ L • / 1 ,. /~, ~«H /<!a-~ ~ C7 ~~~ 1~3y c~-. Y it y, 7 ' ~~ ~~ d%~ ~'7 ~]7 p/re, e i r ~ f n- PETITION Ne the undersigned residents of Upland and Rancho Cucamonga ere united against the proposal to route Red Hill traffic (via Alta Cuesta) through to Grove Ave. for a number of reasons: (1) the already heavy traffic flow coming up Grove (2) the unusually high incident of traffic accidents on N. Grove (3) that, we feel, this proposal would not solve Red Hill's problem; but, increase the Craffic flow. Furthermore, we Che undersigned feel that options such as closing off stress, installing speed bumps; or more practically, installing a center divider on Foothill (East of Crove) would do far Dore to discourage traffic floe through Red Nill Chan any other options. pSTITION TO TN6 RAN['BO C[R,J1-gNGA CITY CgINCIL We, the undersigned, sra opposed to the pro osed realignment of Red H111 Country Club Drive ae set forth Sn the attached document, paragraph 7.1.3. We sre opposed to this change because: 1. No direct communication on the proposed change was sent to the residents of this area. 2. adequate study of alternative eolutlons was not given. We hereby request the city to analyze and present additional alternatives for an "efficient and safe" transition to Foothill Boulevard to the area residents. Date Slg~d Naae iMr Mrs or Ms 1 ass TeleDhona `~ ~y ~, `~`-j~~~,.~,~ ~" ~ Siyg ~ ~ an.(/ a L~ ' -p~~ rya ~ ~';~~~ /ib~rn 7 y~~ ycs~. I I... v/ i• ~. ' PETITION TO THE RANCBO CUCAMONCA CITY COUNCIL Wa, the undersigned, are opposed to the proposed realignment of Red Aill Country Club Drive as set forth in the attached document, paragraph 7.1.3. We are opposed to this change becau ee: 1. No direct communication on the proposed change was sent to the residents of this area. 2. Adequate study of alternative solutions was not given. We hereby request the city to analyze and present additional alternatives for an "efficient and safe" ~____, .a ..., ~., c..,.thill Boulevard to the area residents. 7.1.2 Aaess Control Program Business contiguous to Foothill Boulevard currently realise no access restrictions. In addition, existing fragmented parcel configurations promote a multiple of wn- flicting access points which disrupt traf- fic flow by rousing Increased side fric- tion. A recommended program of access controls, consistent with current city access policies regulating access point, driveway cuts, and their location from on another; including the provision of reciprocal access agreements, and special vehicular access controls, (such as right- in, and right out islands) is necessary due to the following: o Increased vehicular traffic capacity; o Increased perception of safety; o Reduced vehicular traffic wnflict points; and o Reduced vehicle/pedestrian conflict points. 7.1.3 Red Hill Realignment Currently, Red Hill intersects Foothill Boulevard at an awkward angle. Due to this existing configuration, Red Hill will be realigned in order to promote an efficient and safe transition to Foothill Boulevard. A preferred alignment was selected the following the consideration of other alignment scenarios. The selected alignment is shown on this page. ~~~ . J --. U, , =• ~ I_ _ i~ ~ } ~~~~-~~ .j j I Redhili Rai ynmsnt ~~ r4'i31~ T I I ~ ~u~ i i •~ Elm 06/12/87 CIRCULATION CONCEPT PETITION TD THB HAN[~O CUCJUIONGA CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned, are opposed to the proposed realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive as set forth in the attnched document, paragraph 7.1.3. We are opposed to this change because: 1. No direct communication on the proposed change wee sent to the reeidenta of this area. 2. Adequate study of alternative solutions was not given. We hereby request the city to analyze end present additional alternatives for an "efficient and safe" transition to Foothill Boulevard to the area reeidenta. Dste S, <med Name /Mr.. Nrs., or Ns.) Address Teleshom 7.t.2 Access Control Program Business wntiguous to Foothill Boulevard currently realize no access restrictions. In addition, existing fragmented parcel configurations promote a multiple of con- flicting access points which disrupt traf- fic flow by causing Increased side fric- tion. A recommended program of access controls, wnsistent with current city access policies regulating access point, driveway cuts, and their location from on another; including the provision of reciprocal access agreements, and special vehicular access controls, (such as right- in, and right-out islands) is necessary due to the following: Increased vehicular traffic capacity; Increased perception of safety; Reduced vehicular traffic conflict points; and Reduced vehicle/pedestrian conflict points. 7.1.3 Red Hill Realignment Currently, Red Hill intersects Foothill Boulevard at an awkward angle. Due to this existing configuration, Red Hill will be realigned in order to promote an efficient and safe transition to Foothill Boulevard. A preferred alignment was selected the following the t:onsideration of other alignment scenarios. The selected alignment is shown on this page. ^~- ~ ~ ~~ ._, oa~~`d ~~~ ~ ,~7 ~ ~ ~.,~T~`'}~ ~ j Redhilt Reailpnment •-._,., 06112!67 CIRCULATION CONCEPT PfiTITIDN TO TBH RANC90 CUCAMONGA CITY CollNCIL We, the undersigned, are opposed to the proposed realignment of Red Hill Country Club Dr1ve ae set forth Sn the attached document, paragraph 7.1.3. We are opposed to this change because: 1. No direct communication on the proposed change was sent to the residents of this area. 2. Adequate study of alternative solutions was not given. We hereby request the city to analyze and present additional alternatives for an "efficient and safe" transition to Foothill Boulevard to the area residents. Date Sinned Name (Mr.. Mrs., or Me.) Address Telephone /~I ~ C ~ UAM ~~~ ' , > ~~, -C ~L I a LA ~~ . l " '.^'C l` ~Qn[.[1 Z, ~v(~CSYX4+. J / 3~ Ul /,+~ / //.,7~ ~dw~ ov . / ~ ~(L. ~~ L~`~ ~ tdcl ~ u.,(.C r(.J _GC 79~~~)G~ /J /'~.T/ (~ tpI //~~ 1/ G~ 'N1O'~{'v ~~: c~.-ie v /i1~...r/.~ ~ '7,4) / ( % ~ ~° f. ~~ i ~ ~ i ~-;~_ 2'.~~~-~ dh1,~ C ~a_ s -~ ~ ~ - / ~ C / 0 9v -~ 5 ,dui 7 ~/F (.ll ~ ~ 7/~ 9'. ~ 7 l l -w-/ ! j',. !~, .~~~ CEe'~z~ i~ ~ 9 - 9P9.a~.~3 `/'I(r ~ ~/ 'Yi~.L~` •lC2A.~.1,i.IL~. ~'!(;Gti~ .~ LUUnMOnGA~ ~ ~ 17.70 ~!p) 83k`~ Q ,i ~. -.V'7 /' ~'n,a._ U CL~Q ~o»,q, '-e ~f. v/ 0 9f'9-~/G>~~ ,.-~ Y-' ~ C .'~,~:,.ti~ ~k~-~-~: I Jr+` LLJ( N' C .~ ~~«</:,..,, ~.~:a~,~~, (~ spy ~~u 7.1.2 Access Control Program Business contiguous to Foothill Boulevard currently realize no access restrictions. In addition, existing fragmented parcel configurations promote a multiple of con- flicting access points which disrupt traf- fic flow 6y causing increased side fric- tion. A recommended program of access controls, consistent with current city access policies regulating access point, driveway cuts, and their location from on another; including the provision of reciprocal access agreements, and special vehicular access controls, Isuch as right- in, and right-out islands) is necessary due to the following: o Increased vehicular traffic capacity; o Increased perception of safety; o Reduced vehicular traffic conflict points; and o Reduced vehiclelpedestrian conflict points. 7.7.3 Red Hill Realignment Currently, Red Hill intersects Foothill Boulevard at an awkward angle. Oue to this existing configuration, Red Hill will be realigned in order to promote an efficient and safe transition to Foothill Boulevard. A preferred alignment was selected the following the consideration of other alignment scenarios. The selected alignment is shown on this page. I~~_D J ®~ ~., ~ , .,~ ~... ~~ T 1) I '• ~,.,~-!~§_-~ ~gedhll! Realignment 1 `~i f'~i~l T~I ~I i ~~i ~ i 'i fJ\ 06/12187 CIRCULATION CONCEPT PETITION TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONCA CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned, ere opposed to the proposed realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive ae set forth in the attached document, paragraph 7.1.3. We are opposed to this change because; 1. No direct communication on the proposed change was sent to the residents of thla area. Z. Adequate study of alternative solutions was not given. We hereby request the city to analyze and present additional alternatives for an "efficient and safe" transition to Foothill Boulevard to the area residents. Dnte Siwned Name (Mr.. Mrs,, or Ms.) Address Telephone ~I ~1L.U~ . ~ s'3 7 ~o-~.'u.o oS-~` , ,~< ~i j ~ ~ 7 ~ss~r .t~~~5v,~c~ ' i// 1 !ry ni. 1~i. .Gl,I.l7 %%c~ i~"G'..a!! ./~~nir ^~ y-li fr! ~ - , ~~ '.r ~ ~', ':-, ~., ,,, wy- . ~.r~c 9 ~'3 ~ 3 i ca~2,u ~ 9S9Gay %v c..~ • /9 L i7 1.~ tin r~- Q n. c ~ S'7 - ~ /~ ~~, ~ ~ :~~c~~~ ~r~~f4~5 ~ _ <~,-~ Ci..~c-<< ~ t' ~~1~"~) ~~~ ~ W~li I Yi ~ ,;a ~ / 1~~~ ~ q i ar))~ i ~ G . i 1i &! 1: :..C .Gli t. ~ '~O ~ r_L°.>ryi" ~1, cL«G. . i/ QA.~ (~`G~' ,~~ ~ ~CII~.,' ~ ,~ _ 7.1.2 Access Control Program Business contiguous to Foothill Boulevard currently realize no access restrictions. In addition, existing fragmented parcel configurations promote a multiple of con- flicting access points which disrupt traf- fic flow by causing increased side fric- tion. A recommended program of access controls, consistent with current city access policies regulating access point, driveway cuts, and their location from on another; including the provision of reciprocal access agreements, and special vehicular access controls, (such as right- in, and right-out islands) is necessary due to the fallowing: o Increased vehicular traffic capacity; o Increased perception of safety; o Reduced vehicular traffic conflict points• and o Reduced vehicle/pedestrian conflict points. 7.1.3 Red Hill Realignment Currently, Red Hill intersects Foothill Boulevard at an awkward angle. Due to this existing configuration, Red Hill will be realigned in order to promote an efficient and safe transition to Foothill Boulevard. A preferred alignment was selected the following the consideration of other alignment scenarios. The selected alignment is shown on this page. ~~ ~ 0 `~ ~, __, ~~ ~.T .\ , I ~ 'b r~ ~ 1 I ~,..~ ~ I T.-a j I Redhiii Realignment ~~ 06/12;87 CIRCULATION CONCEPT PETITION TO TH6 RANCHO CUCAhONCA CITY COUN(,IL We, the undersigned, are opposed to the proposed realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive as set forth in the attached document, paragraph 7.1.3. We are opposed to this change because: 1. No direct communication on the proposed change was sent to the residents of this area. 2. Adequate study of alternative solutions was not given. We hereby request the city to analyze and present additional alternatives for an "efficient and safe" transition to Foothill Boulevard to the area residents. Date Signed Nasaj (Mr.. lira.. or Na ) Address Taleohone /S 6 ~ ,:-ai ~f k...~... P"6Si /-,zf/,, i/ .B~Ld 5~ 3 / yPS-S SsL ~~ ; ~G" ; ~~ * ~ t ~ '/Y y~/~ ~~ y nc~-r/w 71t~..~ ;iGfi t.,.,.::., w<.., v/~,~,. ~ifc~~z,-v ~~ -- ~~~~ ~7 ~ ~k~ i '1 _ ~~ ~".~.~,t`~ ~ 9 /~) ~l~Y' ~l ~ ;1~~~ _ IV 'NC'"\ 1 /~~ /. S~/ti.. `4ry ~~ ~~"L?%7W J <7 :'[~_/'!}/ T ~ .1 ), i ' ~ ~/4 ~ .,_i vim, -~,~> ~~ 7.1.2 Access Contrd Program Business wntiguoua to Foothill Boulevard currently realize no access restrictions. In addition, existing fragmented parcel wnfigurations promote a multiple of con- flicting access points which disrupt traf- fic flow by causing increased side fric- tion. A recommended program of access controls, consistent with current city access policies regulating access point, driveway cuts, and their location from on another; including the provision of reciprocal access agreements, and special vehicular access controls, (such as right- in, and right-out islands) is necessary due to the following: o Increased vehicular traffic capacity; o Increased perception of safety; o Reduced vehicular traffic conflict points; and o Reduced vehicle/pedestrian conflict points. 7.1.3 Red Hill Real'wnment Currently, Red Hiil intersects Foothill Boulevard at an awkward angle. Due to this existing configuration, Red Hill will be realigned in order to promote en efficient and safe transition to Foothill Boulevard. A preferred alignment was selected the following the wnsideration of other alignment scenarios. The selected alignment is shown on this page. ~ sass _ J. ._ ~ a ~~~ d~Q, -~~ - ; ,- __._ ~~° ~~ >. `fly I ~ ~ ~ -~~ ~. _ `-, :o~ ~- ~ ~- e _~ ~4 ..~ j Redhlll Realipnmant ~~' 06112187 CIRCULATION CONCEPT PETITION TO THB RANCBO CUCAMONCA CITY COIRlCIL We, the undersigned, ere opposed to the proposed realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive as eat forth in the attached do~!!ment, paragraph 7.1.3. We ere opposed to this change because: 1. No direct communication on the proposed change was sent to the residents of this area. 2. Adequate study of alternative solutions was not given. We hereby request the city to analyze and present additional alternatives for an "efficient and safe" transition to Foothill Boulevard to the area residents. Date SS~ned Name (Mr.. Mrs.. or Ma.l Address Telephone ~ ~ / c./ J~ u r~ .~-.1 G i 3 ~~/ 9s~ ~ ~ c ~;~~ ~ ~~ y ~ cc,clz. i~L ~~ 'S~''~ ~ c' r 5 ....- `~-~c ~'? ~ anli-a.~t,. 5 {~e-~--a ~~a 9i7ei ~3~ d9G7 . loc-y9 cTcn~P ~,= ,if ~ c~ 4"l~ ~~i~r. 8 ~ ~ ti~ Xrv8K6 ~~ / ~ ,! r ii~C° ~ ' / l Z J 1 1 zt.: Access Control Program Business contiguous to Foothill Boulevard currently realize no access restrictions. In addition, existing fragmented parcel configurations promote a multiple of con- flicting access points which disrupt traf- fic flow by causing increased side fric- tion. A recommended program of access controls, consistent with current city access policies regulating access point, driveway cuts, and their location from on another; including the provision of reciprocal access agreements, and special vehicular access controls, (such as right- in, and right out islands) is necessary due to the following: o Increased vehicular traffic capacity; o Increased perception of safety; o Reduced vehicular traffic conflict points• and o Reduced vehiclelpedestrian conflict points. 7.1.3 Red Hill Rolignment Currently, Red Mill intersects Foothill Boulevard at an awkward angle. Due W this existing wnfiguration, Red Hill will he realigned in order to promote an efficient and safe transition to Foothill Boulevard. A preferred alignment was selected the following the consideration of other alignment scenarios. The selected alignment is shown on this page. r~_ d°`~• _n ~' u ~~_i~'_ .~ ~ Redhill Reallpnmertt 06112187 CIRCULATION CONCEPT PETITION TO TH6 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned, are opposed to the proposed realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive ee set forth in the attached document, paragraph 7.1.3. We are opposed to this change because: 1. No direct communication on the proposed change was sent to the residents of this area. 2. Adequate study of alternative solutions was not given. We hereby request the city to analyze and present additional alternatives for an "efficient and safe" transitiott to Foothill Boulevard to the area residents. Date Sianetl Name (Mr.. Mrs., or Ms.1 Address Telephone 9 l~L/a? 111.w 97x'1 Maw,dw.a U..~ /D y~1~P9 .2n ~~[~e~rr..~..t.~n.o/%.~ ~39a s~+o ~'~' ~.+ck c/t. 9V~ -S~f~ 7.1.1 Access Control Program Business contiguous to Foothill Boulevard currently realise no access restrictions. In addition, existing fragmented parcel configurations promote a multiple of con- flicting access points which disrupt traf- fic flow by causing increased side fric- tion. A recommended program of access controls, consistent with current city access policies regulating access point, driveway cuts, and their location from on another; including the provision of reciprocal access agreements, and special vehicular access controls, (such as right- in, and right-out islands) is necessary due to the following: o Increased vehicular traffic capacity; o Increased perception of safety; o Reduced vehicular traffic wnflict points; and o Reduced vehicle/pedestrian conflict points. 1.t.3 Red Hill Realignment Currently, Red Hill intersects Foothill Boulevard at an awkward angle. Due to this existing configuration, Red Hill will he realigned in order to promote an efficient and safe transition to Foothill Boulevard. A preferred alignment was selected the following the consideration of other alignment scenarios. The selected alignment is shown on this page. 1~~~= ~~`~b~~ ~ I ~{ ~ ~~~~_-~ I I Redhiil Rlalignment ~~" tti"~..I~~ T^I I ~, i gut i~ '~ El l 06172!87 CIRCl1LATION CONCEPT PETITION TO T~ RANCHO CUCAMONCA CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned, are opposed to the proposed realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive ae set forth in the attached document, paragraph 7.1.3. We are opposed to this change because: 1. No direct communication on the proposed change was sent to the residents of this area. 2. Adequate study of alternative solutions was not given. We hereby request the city to analyze and present additional alternatives for an "efficient and safe" transition to Foothill Boulevard to the area residents, Date Si ed Name (Mr.. Nrs.. or Ns.1 Addres ~ Tel eohoae // ~, pp ~~ //~~ /~~~~ L~ cQ s. ~d g ' ~~'~ ,G~~ ~f~~n ~" (~. /73~ 9~y - 67 `~/ C ~- j q / ~ `~ y `bra-I y.~s ~ 4 a~~.-1 <c 4.Q a~.~~ v ~. ti ~~~~,. ~« a~~ YO ~/ ~~~ ~.,~dh, ~~r~ .. ~,, ~ - z_ ).1.2 Access Control Program Business contiguous to Foothill Boulevard currently realize no access restrictions. In addition, existing fragmented parcel configurations promote a multiple of con- flicting access points which disrupt traf- fic flow by causing increased side fric- tion. A recommended program of access controls, consistent with current city access policies regulating access point, driveway cuts, and their location from on another; including the provision of reciprocal access agreements, and special vehicular access controls, (such as right- in, and right out islands) is necessary due to the following: o Increased vehicular traffic capacity; o Increased perception of safety; o Reduced vehicular traffic conflict points; and o Reduced vehiclelpedestrian conflict points. 7.1.3 Red Hill Realignment Currently, Red Hill intersects Foothill Boulevard at an awkward angle. Due to this existing wnfiguration, Red Hill will be realigned in order to promote an efficient and safe transition to Foothill Boulevard. A preferred alignment was selected the following the consideration of other alignment scenarios. The selected alignment is shown on this page. 1 1~~ ~ = :~ -- 1 1 ( I ~~b ~ ~ ,~~- S ~ I~LS_ \ ~~ ~ ,``` ;;`'-TAI 'y ~ "~ J ~~_- ~ ~ Redhiii RNlignmsnt ~-; :-, 06112/87 CIRCULATION CONCEPT PETITION TO TH6 RANCHO CUCAMONCA CITY COONCIL We, the undersigned, are opposed to the proposed realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive ae set forth in the attached document, paragraph 7.1.3. We are opposed to this change because: 1. No direct communication on the proposed change was sent to the residents of this area. 2. Adequato study of alternative solutions was not given. We hereby request the city to analyze and present additional alternatives for an "efficient and safe" transition to Foothill Boulevard to the area residents. Date Signed Name (Nr.. Nte., or Me.l Address Telephone 1J E4 A.vc b~-LY'75 /^J 11 y ~1-lG.-~"1 ~ ~1-~,~, _ ~~,..L ~i'~~~Yti_~.r,d,.~at `7~-[o9t' G~II a) l ~ ' r ., ~< -Y'.}t'~ I(i9 ~ f 1 ~ ~ r ~ ~ C' Y ~ f ~«' 1 f'~ ~ I~1 ~I .'~• J i,~.~o.; ,~ ,-~i. T.,- C c "rof "f.ri~u~~"UFR ~-t~«~~47p J.1.2 Access Control Program Business contiguous to Foothill Boulevard currently realize no access restrictions. In addition, existing fragmented parcel configurations promote a multiple of con- flicting access points which disrupt traf- fic flow by rousing increased side fric- tion. A recommended program of access controls, consistent with current city access policies regulating access point, driveway cuts, and their location from on another; including the provision of reciprocal access agreements, and special vehicular access controls, (such as right- in, and right out islands) is necessary due to the following: o Increased vehicular traffic capacity; o Increased perception of safety; o Reduced vehicular traffic conflict points; and o Reduced vehiclel pedestrian conflict points. 7.1.3 Red Hill Realignment Currently, Red Hill intersects Foothill Boulevard at an awkward angle. Due to this existing configuration, Red Hill will be realigned in order to promote an efficient and safe transition to Foothill Boulevard. A preferred alignment was selected the following the consideration of other alignment scenarios. The selected alignment is shown on this page. a>_~- 1 J . _ ~ __ 0 ~ ~T ,, ,~i ~~ , __, ~ 1 ~~~~~ ~~ o~ ~~~-~., ~ ~~ 7 ~ ~ 'iIo {r_,.,U~.~'~-+ °1' --~ j Redhlll Realtpnment ~~~.,.-, I I `-'~ f`i~l T I I i ~LJ~ I i '~ fJ\ 06112187 CIRCULATION CONCEPT PBTITLON TO TR6 RANCNO CUCAMONCA CITX COUNCIL He, the undersigned, are opposed to the proposed realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive ae eat forth in the atteched document, paragraph 7.1.3. We are opposed to this change because; 1. No direct communication on the proposed change was sent to the residents of this area. 2. Adequate study of alternative solutions was not given. We hereby request the city to analyze and present additional alternatives £or an "efficient and safe" transition to Foothill Boulevard to the area residents. Date Slaved Names ( Mr.. Nre.. or Ma.) Address Telauhone I :t t3u.9o.~cu~ .sc.~~~+t /pOS'6 l~f~ b 916~Y7 h CO,~ Nw r q~9-)70~ L ca 1 MM.~ .°.,m-,u ass?zi. 6 Imo l,o <,ce~zos ~49,fz, ,~,~s ~~4r ~~ .., .., .. .. i<awf~r b ~ 4 m P H,v.w~, p A'@n~.'.wnez ¢'~ b89 . C~a c( rt a n~l~ ..GfL.n~Ty L/~1T5 / ~p p Ih'y BLG' PA%94 5~-td-~7 6 g ~vl~e ~~ /111 ~ hHls, ~ ,c,lee~- fv,~~ai ~~, r,,,~,~,,:,~. ~.,~~, ,~.,i v 7 s~- L 7.1.2 Access Control Program Business contiguous to Foothill Boulevard currently realize no access restrictions. In addition, existing fragmented parcel configurations promote a multiple of wn- flicting access points which disrupt traf- fic flow by causing increased side fric- tion. A recommended program of access controls, consistent with current city access policies regulating access point, driveway cuts, and their location from on another; including the provision of reciprocal access agreements, and special vehicular access controls, (such as right- in, and right-out islands) is necessary due to the following: 7.1.3 Red Hill Rralianment Currently, Red Hill intersects Foothill Boulevard at an awkward angle. Due to this existing configuration, Rad Hill will be realigned in order to promote an efficient and safe transition to Foothill Boulevard. A preferred alignment was selected the following the consideration of other alignment scenarios. The selected alignment is shown on this page. o Increased vehicular traffic capacity; o Increased perception of safety; o Reduced vehicular traffic wnflict points; and o Reduced vehicle! pedestrian conflict points. Ia~~- 1 d ~ ~-- i - ~,~ ~\, , ._~ , ~ ~ i ~;:, ~ -~'~ o~ ~ ~~, ~ i ~~ ~' ~ ~ Radhill Raalipnment ~`~' I ~-' i hi"i.31`~ T I ~ ~ i ~r-ti I! '~ Ell 06112187 CIRCULATION CONCEPT Y6TITION TO THfi RANCHO CUCAMONCA CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned, are opposed to the proposed realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive as set forth in the attached document, paragraph 7.1.3. We are opposed to this change because: 1. No direct communication on the proposed change was sent to the reaidenta of this area. 2. Adequate study of alternative solutions was not given. We hereby request the city to analyze and present additional alternatives for an "efficient and safe" transition to Foothill Boulevard to the area reaidenta. Date Sinned Name (Mr.. Mrs.. or Ma.) Address Telephone -IG ~~ ~ "' ~ ~..~~l~i4U,~~ U'7/ ~fiJsr ~`~ad /C ~I~,a~.J~` ~ h-/d ~ i ~ ~ i ~ 7 ~ '~GiS~ ~ / p ii, Y-i~-~~ a ~ ''a~5~ ~ ~ ~o-~y~~ ~ ~ 9- ~L -0~ ~ ~ /Oo o~ p' ~n,'l+CN P/r C~-D -&&36 rte. ,. ., _ 9i ~9 N~~ ~~- c ~ ~' - ~~ 7 ~, 7.1.2 Access Control Program Business contiguous to Foothill Boulevard currently realize no access restrictions. In addition, existing fragmented parcel configurations promote a multiple of con- flicting access points which disrupt traf- fic flow by causing increased side fric- tion. A recommended program of access controls, consistent with current city access policies regulating access point, driveway cuts, and their location from on another; including the provision of reciprocal access agreements, and special vehicular access controls, (such as right- in, and right-out islands) Is necessary due to the following: o Increased vehicular traffic capacity; o Increased perception of safety; o Reduced vehicular traffic conflict points; and o Reduced vehicle/pedestrian conflict points. 7.1.3 Red Hill Realignment Currently, Red Hill intersects Foothill Boulevard at an awkward angle. Due to this existing configuration, Red Hill will be realigned in order to promote an efficient and safe transition to Foothill Boulevard. A preferred alignment was selected the following the consideration of other alignment scenarios. The selected alignment is shown on this page. ^~- ~o~ ~, a ~a {~_.,.~~~~~'~'~7~h~ -~.~' ' Redhill Raalttinment ~= I-~ I~ I I I T ~ II l i i LJ1 I ~ "~ fl \~ 06/12187 CIRCULATION CONCEPT PETITION TO GZ 5 + ~_ THE ~A /,-~ o~(I RANCHO CITY COIHQCIL We, the undersigned, are opposed the realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive tae the attached document, proposed paragraph 7.1.3. set forth in We are opposed to this change because: 1• No direct communication on the proposed change Was sent to the residents of this area. Z• Adequate study of alternative solutions was not given. We hereby request the city to analyze and additional alternatives for transition to Foothill Boulevard to the area'reaidente. present Dnte and safe" I 3-~ ~ Nye (Mr Mra of Ma ) Address ' q Telephone /~~~~~ ~~;.,,.~ ,'xiL3 Y-~~liTirl-c. ~ w~i-d„ .`llld -3/3~ .s ~ u ~ J C n i.. , r . _ „~ ~' ,~~~ ;z..c' afta /ulJ~fu T~71 ~~, n ~~~; .. ~ _ ryt Y/ L J ~ / .~ ^~'~ 1/. L. y ~ ~ - p ..~,~- i i~ I ~/ ~ ~~ 't1 ~4, ;~ T.t.x Access Control Prearam T.1.3 Red NiR Rwlionment Business contiguous to Foothill Boulevard currently realize no access restrictions. In addition, existing fragmented parcel configurations promote a multiple of wn- flicting access points which disrupt traf- fic flow by rousing increased side fr(c- tion. A recommended program of access controls, consistent with current city access policies regulating access point, driveway cuts, and their location from on another; including the provision of reciprocal access agreements, and special vehicular access controls, (such as right- in, and right out islands) is necessary due to the following: o Increased vehicular traffic capacity; o Increased perception of safety; o Reduced vehicular traffic conflict points; and o Reduced vehicle/pedestrian conflict points. Currently, Red Hill intersects Foothill Boulevard at an awkward angle. Oue to this existing configuration, Red Hill will be realigned in order to promote an efficient and safe transition to Foothill Boulevard. A preferred alignment was selected the following the consideration of other alignment scenarios. The selected alignment (s shown on this page. Iir°'~ ~ a ---~ ~ ~, ~ ~~Q l~-_. . - ~.~,. ~, ~.'~T`1`- owl o~~'~ ~ ~ ~~ ~,.~~~~ .-~ ~ RedhiB Rsailpnment I~~ i-~i'c51`~I T I i~ ~ ~ iJ, I ~ •~ E1 ~~~ 06!12(87 CIRCULATION CONCEPT PETITION TD THE RANCB'O CUCAMONCA CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned, are opposed to the proposed realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive ae set forth in the attached document, paragraph 7.1.3. We are opposed to this change because: 1. No direct communication on the proposed change waa sent to the residents of this area. 2. Adequate study of alternative solutions was not given. We hereby request the city to analyze and present additional alternatives for an "efficient and safe" transition to Foothill Boulevard to the area residents. Date S_igaed Nave IMr.. Mrs.. or Ma.l Address Telephone q-I~-g~ 1 iuzz8 auacn~n cr 9bo-F& ` \.~ „_._ ice- nrr ~ 'c~~ %i.'_ ~ir'~BC,l ~ /w ~ ~ r I -l~ ~ ~ ~ `~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x~ . Pcci, ~ P J - j / 1 7.1.2 Acuss Control Program Business contiguous to Foothill Boulevard currently realize no access restrictions. In addition, existing fragmented parcel configurations promote a multiple of con- flicting access points which disrupt traf- fic flow by causing increased side fric- tion. A recommended program of access controls, consistent with current city access policies regulating access point, driveway cuts, and their location from on another; including the provision of reciprocal access agreements, and special vehicular access controls, (such as right- in, and right-out islands) is necessary due to the following: o Increased vehicular traffic capacity; o Increased perception of safety; o Reduced vehicular traffic conflict points; and o Reduced vehicle/pedestrian conflict points. 7.i.3 Red Flill Realignment Currently. Red Hill intersects Foothill Boulevard at an awkward angle. Due to this existing configuration, Red Hill will be realigned in order to promote an efficient and safe transition to Foothill Boulevard. A preferred alignment was selected the following the consideration of other alignment scenarios. The selected alignment is shown on this page. i~e>•. , ~ ~' _,,,_,e; ~T ~ , ` ~ ~.-, ~ ~ a-ry-' `~. X61 _ _. ~ ~i I' ~ -~ ~~~ -~ ~, ;_ ~ ~ I Redhiii Reall9nment ~-.,;~ 06/12/87 CIRCULATION CONCEPT PETITION TO T~ RANCHO CUCAMONOA CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned, are opposed to the proposed renlignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive ae set forth in the attached document, paragraph 7.1.3. We are opposed to this change because: 1. No direct communication on the proposed change was sent to the residents of this area. 2. Adequate study of alternative solutions was not given. We hereby request the city to analyze and present additional alternatives for an "efficient and safe" transition to Foothill Boulevard to the area residents. Date Si ed Nasa (Mr., Nra,. or Me.) Address Telephone 9~u/e~~ 9a~ s-' ~ ~/ ~~,~`~-,e-2 C /73 9Fa-~J ~ ~ ~ /oars ~ .,_ l;~. 6E , '1 16~~7 11 ~ VO~x~L^~. ;1 13ea~ U~sha sF ~~, u,~.a„ c~,G17.39 ~9~-I5yb rG~~%'~ r Jrdt ,cif, %471e /fin': c['..i.a[( ,c'at oryl ~ /n,c-r~~/J F PfiTITION TO TAS RANCHO CUCAMONCA CITY COllNCIL We, the undersigned, ere opposed to the propoaed realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive ae set forth in the attached document, paragraph 7.1.3. We are opposed to this change because: 1. No direct communication on the propoaed change was sent to the residents of this area. 2. Adequate study of alternative solutions was not given. We hereby request the city to analyze and presettt additional alternatives for art "efficient and safe" transition to Foothill Boulevard Co the area residents. Date Slaned ame Mr. Mrs. or Na. Address Telephone yj6~~$" ~' 8 z 9~s/53~a 9 l4 - 87 ~ S d.~+~ ~7 ro a -Ca •9~ 7Se g S-!.6 $/ .. s. ~-. ~^v cif-, ,` ~n-.ca ,l~-s~ Q ~ a:~~yer~,~ ~-- 9~~03, /6 o r 3U 87 S 7716 Qe.y 9 /4 7 /~.~ Cc,cm.»on a G/( 9n3* `T,To'87o/ ~ ~. i <<;, i<i ~z icc'E.Ei i,. _. ~_ . n K: S I dn~-'l..tC~..' .I~ /Y//.~/ < ~ t~ } ~ f ' ~ , i'/"~ ~ u'SL_~4. <J /'~ c rU%a C'vGe~M ~~n ~ i ~~' ^ 7 r ~, `3 G'.i'l ~.L~ ~~~ ("1 i I i~c ~,( ` \ ?C - SISU tr i~ art Kti M ' ' ' I ~ \. ~: Cl\.(C\f G ( C.. X117 7 ~'~ ' ~ /~f/ 1, ..G.t, , /lc~r ,.«_ ~ %d rt h:~..^y-.1~, :. ~{. < /~ 9a~r Ir ,. ~.~ ~,, 7.1.2 Access Control Program Business contiguous to Foothill Boulevard currently realize no access restrictions. In addition, existing fragmented parcel configurations promote a multiple of con- flicting access points which disrupt traf- fic flow by rousing increased side fric- tion. A recommended program of access controls, consistent with current city access policies regulating access point, driveway cuts, and their location from on another; including the provision of reciprocal access agreements, and special vehicular access controls, (such as right- in, and right-out islandsl is necessary due to the following: 7.1.3 Red Hill Realignment Currently. Red Hill intersects Foothill Boulevard at an awkward angle. Due to this existing wnfiguration, Red Hill will be realigned in order to promote an efficient and safe transition to Foothill Boulevard. A preferred alignment was selected the following the consideration of other alignment scenarios. The selected alignment is shown on this page. Increased vehicular traffic capacity; Increased perception of safety; Reduced vehicular traffic conflict points; and Reduced vehicle/pedestrian conflict points. IJ• ~ - i J ~ __ ~~;q~-- ~~ T ~, ; ~~i i ~} I~u~~~~ -i j RadhHl Rulipnment ==__;, I I ul fti'i31~ T I I ~, i ~u1 I i '~ EJ~ 06112(87 CIRCULATION CONCEPT PETITION TO THS RANCBO CUCANONCA CITY COpNCIL We, the undersigned, are opposed to the proposed realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive ae set forth in the attached document, paragraph 7.1.3. We are opposed to this change because: 1. No direct communication on the proposed change was sent to the residents of this area. 2. Adequate study of alternative solutions was not given. We hereby request the city to analyze and present additional alternatives for an "efficient and safe" transition to Foothill Boulevard to the area residents. Date SS ed Nase (Mr.. Mre.. or Me.I Address Teleohoae 9~5 b'7 gam, SfK7/ G~tkc.l~+-- L1k~l rmc~ 9e'95/o7(~ 5 ~37 nc.2fa ~~i~! ~~ 3~ ~~cS ~ ~ ~ 8i,.~ Aga ~- Afi ~t-~ ~ s ~aZ 9~a ~~9 w ~~i ~r 3 ~~ ~ ~ y ~1 ,rX y 0 ~ l~' /a-LV.o ~''M.E~. p l ~ ~J'15~~7 ~ (.~ ~~c~---- ~~,iaau.t ~cjr~ ~ s3~ h/.+u~-l~t~, 9fi7-6~8~3 9 ~ `' ~ > u'c~/ta9ficYA s ~ ~ ~'F+, ~~~ 6C~S .o J ,~ 1.1.2 Access Control Progran Business contiguous to Foothill Boulevard currently realise no access restrictions. In addition, existing fragmented parcel configurations promote a multiple of con- flicting access points which disrupt traf- fic flow by rousing increased side fric- tion. A recommended program of access controls, wnsistent with current city access policies regulating access point, driveway cuts, and their location from on another; including the provision of reciprocal access agreements, and special vehicular access wntrols, Isuch as right- in, and right-out islands) is necessary due to the following: 7.1.3 Red Hill Realignment Currently, Red H111 intersects Foothill Boulevard at an awkward angle. Due to this existing configuration, Red Hill will be realigned in order to promote an efficient and safe transition to Foothill Boulevard. A preferred alignment was selected the following the consideration of other alignment scenarios. The selected alignment is shown on this page. o Increased vehicular traffic capacity; o Increased perception of safety; o Reduced vehicular traffic conflict points; and o Reduced vehiclelpedestrian conflict iwints. ~~~ ~\ ~ o ~~ i -~~ J~ -~. Qdaq(-1-- `::;; '~ i ~' ~ 11 >~~~,, a a Q,~-.-~ ) ~ ~ ~T\ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ RedbHl Realgnment ~= ~;., 06/12;87 CIRCULATION CONCEPT PETITION TO THS RANCHO CUCAMONOA CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned, are opposed to the proposed realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive as eat forth in the attached document, paragraph 7.1.3. We are opposed to this change because: 1. No direct communication on the proposed change was soot to the residents of this area. r 2. Adequate study of alternative solutions was not given. We hereby request the city to analyze end present addl tlonal alternatives for an "efficient and safe" ... ~_ ..__..,.,.~ n.,..lnvwrd to the area residents. 7.1.2 Access Control Program Business wntiguous to Foothill Boulevard currently realise no access restrictions. In addition, existing fragmented parcel ranfigurations promote a multiple of con- flicting access points which disrupt traf- fic flow by rousing increased side fri~- tion. A recommended program of access controls, consistent with current city access policies regulating access point, driveway cuts, and their location from on another; including the provision of reciprocal access agreements, and special vehicular access wntrols, Isuch as right- in, and right out islands) is necessary due to the following: o Increased vehicular traffic capacity; o Increased perception of safety; o Reduced vehicular traffic conflict points; and o Reduced vehicle/pedestrian conflict points. 7.1.3 Red Hill Realignment Currently, Red Hill intersects Foothill Boulevard at an awkward angle. Oue to this existing configuration, Rad Hill will be realigned in order to promote an efficient and safe transition to Foothill Boulevard. A preferred alignment was selected the following the consideration of other alignment scenarios. The selected alignment is shown on this page. ^ ~~ ~~ .. ~ - ; ~.._ I ~_ ,,b (\~ J" \\\\\\ _ ~ I Rsdhill Realignmant =~,.\, i ~I T I I I ~ i 4.J~ I I ,i fl 1 06112/87 CIRCULATION CONCEPT PETITION TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned, ere opposed to the proposed realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive ae set forth in the attached document, paragraph 7.1.3. We are opposed to this change because: 1. No direct communication on the proposed change was sent to the residents of this area. 2. Adequate study of alternative solutions was not given. We hereby request the city to analyze and present additional alternatives for an "efficient and safe" transition to Foothill Boulevard to the area residents. Date 5lcmed Name (Mr.. IAra.. or Ms.) Address Telephone ~ ~ ~~u ~~ s 't ~ Y'~F~ F S~'~' / ~ \ ! -~ ~ Ru ~ = (~v~/q C~ ~ r ~~ 9 . ~,. ,~ ~ r9--399 9 ,' ! n,~.~.-;) .ice ~, _. i _ ~ 9~c../F"7 ~c.'z~.~ ( zf..<~~ Ca~ ~ ~P-~~u ~o~,.n.` Y7 08~ '" ' ~ ~ ~_,,;_~ , r, ~ ~ ^~..~ti.. ,._._ ,,cA 587-9370 r 4/9~ ~AU~/1 '- ~~ !~7 ~_~<l~ti `~' d'incaty~ ~i~ caiua, ~a_ 989-N~ ' ., ' 7.1.2 7.1.3 Access Control Program Red Hill Realignment Business contiguous to Foothill Boulevard Currently, Red Hiil intersects Foothill currently realize no access restrictions. Boulevard at an awkward angle. Due to In addition, existing fragmented parcel this existing configuration, Red Hill will j configurations promote a multiple of con- be realigned in order to promote an flitting access points which disrupt traf- efficient and safe transition to Foothill fit flow by causing increased side fric- Boulevard. Lion. A recommended program of access controls, consistent with current city A preferred alignment was selected the access policies regulating access point, following the consideration of other driveway cues, and their location from on alignment scenarios. The selected another; including the provision of alignment is shown on this page. reciprocal access agreements, and special vehicular access controls, (such as right' in, and right-out islands) is necessary due to the following: 1 o Increased vehicular traffic capacity; o Increased perception of safety; o Reduced vehicular traffic conflict _ points; and o Reduced vehicle) pedestrian conflict +~ points. 1 __.--_ _._.. _-_. __...~I J ~ ` i ~1 f ..~F-=- 1 J °° i ~ d, ~ I oo~, '~~~ ~ ~ ,,~~ _ ~- ~ J' ~- ~~~ -- ~ ~ Redhill Reellynment ~'•` ~'""f ~ I I. I ~ l i LJ' I I'~ fl 1 l16/12/a7 CIRCULATION CONCEPT PBTITIQ7 1'O TH6 AANC80 C[A>1MONCA CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned, are opposed to the proposed realignment of Aed Hill Country Club Drive as set Forth in the attached document, paragraph 7.1.3. We are opposed to this change because: 1. No direct communication on the proposed change was sent to the residents of this area. 2. Adequate study of alternative solutions was not given. We hereby request the city to analyze and present additional alternatives for an "efficient and safe" transition to Foothill Boulevard to the area residents. Date Sinned Name (Mr.. Mrs.. or Me.l Address Telephone 7 ~G~.3~ ~5 95~5~ 7.1.2 Access Control Program Business contiguous to Foothill Boulevard currently realize no access restrictions. In addition, existing fragmented parcel configurations promote a multiple of con- tlicting access points which disrupt traf- fic flow by causing increased side fric- tion. A recommended program of access controls, consistent with current city access policies regulating access point, driveway cuts, and their location from on another; including the provision of reciprocal access agreements, and special vehicular access controls, (such as right- in, and right-out islands) is necessary due to the fallowing: Increased vehicular traffic capacity; increased perception of safety: Reduced vehicular traffic conflict points; and Reduced vehicle/pedestrian conflict points. 7.1.3 Red Hill Rralignment Currently, Red Hill intersects Foothill Boulevard at an awkward angle. Oue to this existing configuration, Red Hill will be realigned in order to promote an efficient and safe transition to Foothill Boulevard. A preferred alignment was selected the following the consideration of other alignment scenarios. The selected alignment is shown on this page. ^ _ ~ Q ~~ --> ~. ~ + oo,, _ ~, . <., ~ J ~' ~ ~ ~ Redh,tl RuHpnment I_ i ~''I'L ~`~ I~ i I~ ~ i LJ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~`r. 06/12/87 CIRCULATION CONCEPT PETITION TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONCA CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned, are opposed to the proposed realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive es set forth Sn the attached document, paragraph 7.1.3. We are opposed to this change because: 1. No direct communication on the proposed change was sent to the residents of this area. 2. Adequate study of alternative solutions was not given. We hereby request the city to analyze and present additional alternatives for an "efficient and safe" transition to Foothill Boulevard to the area residents. Date 3laned Nase Mr. lAre. or Ne. Address Telephone ~~/8 ~ ~ ~ - L f~.~,A `ICI-q~s 'Ji"/bib UZ /~1/ff AN l9 /0027 sn-2~-~ lc. 9r~3v dry Qo-771s- PETITION TO TBH RANCHO CUCAhONGA CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned, ere oppoeed to the proposed realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive as set forth in the attached document, paragraph 7.1.3. We are oppoeed to this change because: 1. No direct communication on the proposed change was sent to the reaidenta o£ this area. 2. Adequate study of alternative solutions was not given. We hereby request the city to analyze and present additional alternetlVea for an "efficient and safe" transition to Foothill Boulevard to the area reaidenta. Date Signed Name fMr.. Nre.. or Na.1 Address Telephone /+:.-.~ ,fir J:r ~,; .74~. o ,~ /~ , i i I /~/.~ ~U~j L'c./tiJ ~ /GJSS~LSf. G:~.~~ ~!` ~~ // ICI'" (/CI~n/~i+Ct~ /730 ~Yy~3J A'$ ~ ~ C ~ 75"! N.UiwCu.~• K~4)'L,'i~U _ 7.1.2 Access Control P ram Business contiguous to Foothill Boulevard Inraddiuone existin9afragmented~parcel configurations promote a multiple of con- flicting access points which disrupt traf- fic flow by causing increased side fric- tion. A recommended program of access controls. consistent with current city access policies regulating access point, an therY includi g LheeProvsionn ofrom on reciprocal access agreements, and special vehicular access controls, (such as right- in, and right-out islands} is necessary due to the following: o Increased vehicular traffic capacity; o Increased perception of safety; o Reduced vehicular traffic conflict points; and o Reduced vehicle/pedestrian conflict points. 7.1.3 Red Hill Realignment Currently, Red HIII intersects Foothill Boulevard at an awkward angle. Due W this existing configuration, Red Hill will 6e realigned in order to pronrote an efficient and safe transition to Foothill Boulevard. A preferred alignment was selected the following the consideration of other alignment scenarios. The selected alignment is shown on this page• l i!~'! ~ ~ p ~,, i 9b~~ " i1 -~~, ~ ~nl b~~ ~~.: ~ ~ .~ 11\\,, I ~_-~ e I I Rrdhlll Raalignmenf ':c:~ ~ 'i 'til X31 ~ I I ~ ~ PETITION TO TAE RANCHO CUCAMONCA CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned, are opposed to the proposed realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive as set forth in the attached document, paragraph 7.1.3. We are opposed to this change because: ~. No direct communication on the proposed change was sent to the residents of this area. 2. Adequate study of alternative solutions was not given. We hereby request the city to analyze and present additional alternatives for an "efficient and safe" transition to Foothill Boulevard to the area residents. Date Sinned Name (Mr.. Mre., or New Address Telephone 9~ ~ i/aY ~o~~Se[a ~/y- y i 21RS. ~/ Cyi~ 6 d Cu 9~~~C 98~~Ca~ 'Nls, /I2k LontR Sa.,4 7/y !~a!P7 ~' i~vG Y y o I , / V n ~ QQ N~ ~H ~lLl0. G~5 LII 4 '"r' n w Yl CLl L/i - ~ ,~ ucC a.-m un a Lea 9/7 30 `1'~6 `9S0 `j I ~ VC ~.n~. SGU GLd ^.JphJ-r~ti-' i A p q A~ ~_ ~--- ~Ad~- 9i73o ,~' ~ `-( tLu/~'ia•,e /~~.n ~ ~7 fv Ulm, Se~e/i ~ ~I~f 73d~ r-- - --- ~e~ _ r.. {"__ . _ _ __ ~' u-Ce!1iL.lL~ ` ._ 5.6' i " rg _CFI.(.(.' ~ _ d I I ~ ,~y~~ ,a~ I H /C. s3~~ ~~.. ~ufiu, 9~.r•~ s ,~'' 7 J ~~ /~(jL[, ~ ~ ~YN l1G ~ ~ , ~ - ~3Q ) 7.1.2 Aecess Control Program Business contiguous to Foothill Boulevard currently realize no access restrictions. In addition, existing fragmented parcel configurations promote a multiple of con- flicting access points which disrupt traf- fic flow by rousing increased side fric- tion. A recommended program of access controls, consistent with current city access policies regulating access point, driveway cuts, and their location from on another; including the provision of reciprocal access agreements, and special vehicular access controls, Isuch as right- in, and right-out islands) is necessary due to the following: o Increased vehicular traffic capacity; o Increased perception of safety; o Reduced vehicular traffic conflict points; and o Reduced vehicle/pedestrian conflict points. 7.1.3 Red Hill Realignment Currently, Red Hill intersects Foothill Boulevard at an awkward angle. Oue to this existing configuration. Rad HIl1 will be realigned in order to promote an efficient and safe transition to Foothill Boulevard. A preferred alignment was selected the following the consideration of other alignment scenarios. The selected alignment is shown on this page. N ya5 E IFS ~ . J ~p •, ~ 1 -„ ~' T ~ ~_~~f/ ~' b~~~~~ Ot7, ~ " ~' ~{ i ~~~~_ ~ R~dhiil ReallQnmant ~-::, 06112187 CIRCULATION CONCEPT PRTITION TO TBS NANCJ30 CUCAMONCA CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned, are opposed to the proposed realignment of Red Bill Country Club Drive ae set forth in the attached document, paragraph 7.1.3. We are opposed to this change because: 1. No direct communication on the proposed change was sent to the realdents of this area. 2. Adequate study of alternative solutions was not given. We hereby request the city to analyze and present additional alts rnstives for an "efficient and safe" traneitlon to Foothill Boulevard to the area realdents. Date SS ed Name (Mr.. Nre.. or Na.) Address Teleoboae Y ~ '. ~~. -F F n IR ~~ ~ ~-ws ~ ~:.t ~ ~~i+s\)~no.,,,;~,.~~~~.,,~~ _. ~<.R~~\ t„~~.,a G,~a11~1Fw 9~ta-4~~1 ~ ,. y ,. ~ - j'r -- ~ a , -. ' Dlr., -, j... ;~ ~ v r ~ Lin-.n,ZC_, ~..-~/~~l-~ ~', /~ S ~~ ~ l ie-c~- ~v°t . ~ G fr' ~ ~ ~, b`}o 1 - 7.1.2 Access Control Prearam Business contiguous to Foothill Boulevard currently realize no access restrictions. In addition, existing fragmented parcel configurations promote a multiple of con- flicting access points which disrupt traf- fic flow by causing increased side fric- lion. A recommended program of access controls, consistent with current city access policies regulating access point, driveway cuts, and their location from on another; including the provision of reciprocal access agreements, and special vehicular access controls, (such as right- in, and right out islandsl Is necessary due to the following; 1 o Increased vehicular traffic capacity; o Increased perception of safety; o Reduced vehicular traffic conflict points• and o Reduced vehicle/pedestrian conflict - points. 7.1.3 Red Hill Realiaronent Currently, Red Hifl intersects Foothill Boulevard at an awkward angle. Due to this existing configuration, Red Hill will be realigned in order to promote an efficient and safe transition to Foothill Boulevard. A preferred alignment was selected the following the consideration of other alignment scenarios. The selected alignment is shown on this page. lil~~~ p '~ • ~ a~i~'~--`- - ' f`~ ~- -1 ~ i Retlhlii Rsailgnmant 06/12/87 CIRCULATION CONCEPT A. ~„ ~ vENru~ o~to~ar con~wY September 15, 1987 city Council c/o ~ Barry Hanson, Sr. civil Engineer Mr. Scott Murphy, Associate Planner City of RancYfo CUCamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Clicanglga, CA 91730 Re: Tract 13476 City Council Appeal -September 16, 1987 Gentlemen: Notwithstanding our previous proposals (please see our letter of Sepiember 10, 1987), upon further ooreideration we would like to propose still araUler solution to the very difficult problem of undergrounding overhead wires along Hellman Ave. Inasmuch as normal urclergrounding dlatges are shard 50/50 by developers on hotA sides of the street, and since this is not possible on Hellman Ave. because it is entirely developed, we propose a fair solution to the very high cost would be for us to oaV rn~r nn~mal SnY show ..i ya.x.......r ~~~ ___ _ _ nsiyaw~ulty as determined by Southern California E'r3lson.~ 'R1eWmoney could be held by the City to be used for lufdeigrolalding along Hellman whenever it takes place. Once again this proposal is su6nitted in a spirit of cooperation and to demonstrate our wi111ngness io pay our fair arcl reasonable share. Very ly y tau Berkowitz t~;mh c: Steve Wheatley RECEI!/E® SEP ~ 5 i9B1 Clry OF RANCHO CUCAAN)NOA ENDINEERINC DIVISION 3900 SEPI VEDA BOULEVARD ~ SUITE tO4 ~ VAJV NUVB, CALIFORNIA B'141'I • (B1O]' - ,- ---- -- wesT vErorur~ oevEtorn~nR comPannr September 10, 1987 City of Ran~w CLcamorga 9320 eaaeline Road Rancho Ncamonga, CA 91730 Re: Tract 13476 -City Council Appeal September 16, 1987 Gentlemen: Cn Lne referenced tract the planning crnmisaion has required the undeigtoundirg of the poles on Hellman in front of ovr tract. '1b canply with this, we moat underground from the first pole on the south side of Tryon Si. to the first pole to the north of the tract, a total distance of approximately 950 £eet. We have contracted So. Cal. Edison as to the cost since they will be doing the work, and we were told it would cost $275 per foot plus engineering, etc. 'that would britx3 the cost to over $275,000. Further, Edison would rot give us a date for installation since small jobs do not receive any nri nr; ~;., 1b absorb $275,000 over 37 lots (S7,432 per lot) is totally uneconomical along with all the other conditions the City now insises on and will force us to abandon the project. Please note that in the conditions it is pointed out that the cpposi to side of the street is developed and there can be no reimtursement of aryl coats. 'this 93 acre tract is an infill development along Hellman, a street that has been substantially built up for years. 'fie balance of the street will probably never be undetgtounded and the portion represented by our tract would be insignificant. we propose that in lieu of urrjergroundinq cur tract, we pay an amount of 52,000 per lot or $74,000 to the City of Rancho CLCamorga to use in a more advantageous place such as where new 89O05EPV' VEDA pOULEVARO ~ SUITE ~O4 ~ VAN NUYS, CALIFORNIA 9tatt • (8~6~9OB-9508 City of Rancho CLCamonga September 10, 1987 Page 2 development has left pockets of lines to the undergrouldcd, oz we would like to suggest the money be used as a beginning of a fund that someday could be used to underground all o£ Hellman Ave. and not just a few hundred feet within Several miles. L the foregoi~ is not possible then as an alternative we submit the enclosed pictures for your review. we propose an extensive decorative landscape plan alotg Hellman Ave., with specimen trees, mature planting alatg with a decorative slumpStone wall. the landscape would be for in excess of that rarmally required by the City. We feel that would do a great deal to beautify the street until same time in the future when the entire aireet could be done. fie are willicg to d0 our share to maintain the starclazd9 of the City and these proposals are in the spirit of working with the City to acoompliah its goals in a sound and reasonable manner. Very ttply yours, i / ~~~LOU Berkawriz ~, [B/mh encl. 3i 'S Ordin•ne• Ib. NO Pap 7 6. Intarpnt•tiod Of nla laTmdY'lp lYlu fat•rpNGtlau ab•N nuA•d, Y G tM aawt lae•tim o< Ch• balRdarlN of tM arW of apaefal floc! h•aard• (tar •n•pl•e abai'a tban •pp••r• to M • owtliet GCY•a • ••pp•d boua0•rq aM actual nAd owditie0•.) Any gram nmtutiaa EM loo•Lim of EM bouWrf shall M avN • ro•m•bl• apportuoity b •ppMl CM fOGrpn4eloe u provldw !o Smtim 19.12.150 f 5.'2.090 M•Snt•nanr, Or Flood ProtaotSan Meaauraa IDs •aihtmmn of my and all rlooe protmtlm swu»a, (lavuar dikar dad er raa•rvolNl~ x111 M proHdad b) th• City for my pub;3c lspror•amt,. if tense waavru aN printaty ew•d. m op•ntlm or oivtatuac• plan will M raqulrad of CM oan•r Co Mon f11• alth tM CSty F>t{Sna•r. 19.12.100 HaLN Mittpelon Plm Ina loin a6•ney er Yo•rd Napopaibla for nvl•vLy all Dropoa•la fof naa e•wloprot atoll w1(h all nquasG ter futon flood plain d•vlepnant yIOat mmunitys Caawnl Plan. Cayid•r•tim of CM follwleVt •lanfnta aN rpuir•d MteN approv11 t. Dataratnatlon if propvaM uvalop•ant if >p ar ,ffmis lmwn need plain 2. 2nfoN CM paella of !M propexd wtifltl 3. DataR1Y If CeaN Sa a pnotinbla alNrnatiu ar a1N for tea propoaM aetivitq Y. ZdmcSty impact of tha •etlllty m tea flood plain 5. Provld• • plan to aStSpt• tM lapaeL of tha actlvitf alth pNVlaiws Sn Smtion ig. 12.080U1(q. 19. i$.I10 9LmdaNa OC CONLNCC3011 ... aN•: er apmial none NxWar tM rollorln{ standards aN rpuir•dt• A. Mchar 1. A31 nm comtruetiOn ud aubatmtisl f•provammca atoll M mCbOrld t0 pNYapt rlotatl0n, COllapa• or 1•tar•1 .J.gant of cn. atry0turo. 2. All mblla hope aWll amt M• uehorinS standards of Smtion t9. 12. 130(U. B. Con•CNCtian Wt•riala and lMtnada 1. All M• ConatN0tlm Nd fu0at,ntial 1lproyaaM•ita fMll M oooatruetW vlth Ytarl•li and utility aqulpfmpt MlfNpt t• [lood dsrp. 2. All nau mnalryotlm and aubstantLl itproramt• aNll uaa aathoda and pnatiou !Mt •1nlallu Woad daY/s. 3• A11 a!etunta dµt fumtt•n u • pert of tM seruotunr fueh u turlunr hot star hut•rr •Sr oonditioaarr ate., !lull M •1•aat•0 to or aMya tea Ws• /lwd dantion or depth nuadur spmlft•d m eh• fIM. Fiood (~~d i v~ a u~~ a Ordlnanea Yo. 2u0 Pmp 8 C. Elantlm aM yloodwwflom t. mw owutrmEim amd auML1nt41 improa~Int at amy atrvetura stole Mn CM 1w1aS MD14DL flow. Imludlo~ bmamamnt, IlanLW b or • Int1m. Nenrnidwt4l etevoturmm oy aMNt tD1 atan0ardm Sm 9wtim 19.12.11 'J'(7). Upm oomplltlm of LM atrvaturo tM Illntlm of Lh1 lowat MDICmDb tlmr Smludlug Duamant atoll M clrtStlld Df 1 raglabrld profaasionml anginaw er aurvggr w vlriflld by CM local Eu11d1~ Snspwtor CML alwmtim rpulrlmanb My Dmav mt. poLificmtien of doaryliwca atoll M rwordq v amt fortD Sn Swtlm 19. 12.OB04Mf5{e Cr 2. Nw comtrvetion mod auDatwt4l Smprovamwt of any atructuw Sn 2ona AO atoll Mn LM loose floor, Swludlty MaaNnt, alwatad to or moon EM depth nn4r apwltlad m tM FIgM. If than to m d.peh number w tna PIBM, th1 :Dune [loon, 1nc1W1ng Msamwt, atoll M Ilwmttl 4 m dlp4 of wa toot shoo thm Mp1ut aC¢cwt aa'ada. Non naldmtlal rtructuraa uy mot atwdarda Sn Section 19. 12. t10(C)(2). Upon cmplatloo of tM atrntura cmpllmnn to Eh1 ellvatlm requirement atoll M nrtifbd Dy • rlgiabrad pro[eaaiavl elginllr or aurwyor or nritlad Dy CM local bu11d1ng 4mpwtoc. Notificetinn of ccmplimca atoll M nwrdad ms nt forth !n Swoon tg, t2.ago(C7(7), 3. Nawvaldwt4l atoll Hthw M Ilentmd fn nmfolLncl v120 Swtlon t9. 12.110(W (t) or (2) or topther vitD mtiandmdt utility and aanltatp facllltiea. a. M floodproc[ad w EMC Mlov CM Mae flood else th1 rtructun fa va[IrtigM vith vmlla aubatantlmlly SrymrawDla 4 tM pnagl of scar D, Nn structural waapoven4 dpmbb of naietium hydrostatic and Dydrodynaado leads and affwb of Douyaney, aMi c. M cart Stead Dy a rlgfabred pro[oaimrul en61n11r or archlbct thmt LM atmdutla o[ th Sa suMwLlm art amtlaf4d. Such ewtlfleatiws aMa M provided to tM of[SC3m1 ea sat forth in Sectfan 19. 12.OBO(G (3). Y, tbDlle haawa atoll mot CM eDoo a4ndaMa end also 41 a4nNMe In e~..M nn , v .,, !9J2. 120 Stmn4rda for Stenp of Wbrial d Eg ~ipm t A. Tha atorap or prowaetng o[ ®4rflla CMC are In timm of floodl~ Duoymnt, !la®mDb, etplwln~ or mould he inlurfom Cc human, mnfo.l or plant 11f1 Ia prohlbitnd. 8. 54rmp of other ma4rA1 or pulpmMt mmy M mllond St not au0lwt b mmler damlml Oy floada avd lf:viy anchored to prevwt flotatim or It really rvaavmDll frw thm are v1tD1n MI CSm1 anilable afbr flood vu'n1N. 19.12.130 Standards for Ut111tiu A. Ail nw and nplwaamn[ nbr supply and awltary amp ayatw under tM control at the City of Pandhe Cuquovp Amil M dsatpld Eo alnimin or Iliminmb ln[iltrmtfoo of Hood stars 2nt> the ayatas and dlacharp [ram fyatw Snb Hood non. B. Oo-a1t1 nab d4poul gsEau atoll M looatM ca avoid fapmltalnt 4 tn.. or amtaminacim f1w the durla~ tloodin~. 19.12.1x0 SCmndmnl for 9ubd1r1a1onm A. All pnllallury auDdivbim propwels atoll idwtiry CM flood Maard arw and EM Ilvmtim of CM Mu flood u dlbrminmd Dy CM City Pnglnnr. 4 3 . Ordloavc• NC. 2q0 Pap 10 14.12.160 Plepdeaw lFCatld aitnln aroma Of epenlal flood Maud •aGbllabed Sv g•atlov 19. f2.0g0(B) an area dalputad a tloodwra. sines CM flooaar !e m •atraalr Mrardow srsa des to the vlocitr of tlwtl wean ehigh earn Mbrte, potential pro0entila, ad erosio0 gtatial, CM follervivg prorialau +pPbt A. Prohlhit marwchaamta, Including fill, nw ooatrvctfon, aubftentlal Lproraevta, and other der•logenE. B. It no floodwy Ia Sdentifi•d then • a•t Mak 100 fat flee CM bmk(a) of the wbfcewry vlll M ntabl4hfd, voles mcrwchant will M probltlted. 19.12.170 AOgala and Yarlmee Procedure A. Appel Bwrd t. 1T• Ctty Cowe31 atoll har and decide appals and rwuup for verlmcea free the requireanta of LhSa Chapter. 2. Tne L1Er Counall atoll Mar avd d•vide appall vMv it Sa all. C fa m Error tv a1 rwuireant, deniaiop, or d•ter7latlen ad• 6r t r oar n rna[orana vLth tM prorlaiaa of this tlupter. 7. In gaaing upon sum applicacloa, tM ClCy Coaotl atoll ooaSGr all t•eM1ca1 eralwtivna, all relevant before, ataadaras spgifi•d !n other aentloa of Mia OMDter, agdl a. tM danpr LMt at•rLla ay M fa•pt mta othm laMe to CM Sndury of otMnl 0. M• danger of 1!fe and progrty des to flooding or erosion daagq o. the awceptibility of LM progaed faeilicy end Sta enntents to flood darp end tM .fleet of auch chap m GM Sndlrldwl omen d, tM legrtanq of LM aerviaa provided br eM progs•d facility to the coo unity; e. Lhe avet1ab111tr of alterative lOC•L10gl, for tM proposed ma Mich are not aub]ent t0 flooding Or erosion daapl L LM cemgtabll!tp of LM proposed we vlth ealating and mLicigted dewlopant~ g. CM rolaLlanaMp of the proposed w• to the caaprahemiw plan alW flood plain maagant proRa for tMt areal h. the safety of acoeaa Lo CM progrty Sn Llrya Of flood tar ordinary and eargency vahicleal t. GM expactM Mlgnta, rQOC1ty, duaEian, nta of ria, ad tediaant crazuport of CM flood vabrs ens LM .[!fete of veto action, if +pDlleabb, eapwt•d d CM silos end, i. CM costa Ot proriding pwfnaetal arHOn dwing and after flood cvMltionr fncludlmg aincenanam sad r•M1r of publlo utllitlo and fav311tia auch a ewer, pa, •lentrtal, ad ester ayatsr antl strata end hrtdrya, i~ oralYOC• k. zro Pap 11 {. GY•r+111r tariao0•a Yy M LawE far uv oooatruetim and YDRYtla1 1>tR'or~ta to M •rktk m • lot of aoa-bau aan ar lw LD alY omtlNmY to and aurropndatl Dy lots v1tD •aLt1o< atrwtuna ematrwek Wlm the hw flood lw•1, provltlLtN itYa (awl) G Skclm 19.12.110(1)(3) Nw Dean fully ocpltlk•d. V CM lOt alp Snanask Mlmd LM oY-Dal( Yn, tW t•ahaloai lOat1I1C•tlm nqutrk for SYUlaN t4 rarianm iaorwaa. 5• Vpm mmld•ntim o[ tt• fkton of Swt1m 19.12.170(\)(3) ak tb. purpoaY Of ttls cluptw, tha CSty Council ay attaM loch Cokitiom to LM Aa'Ytlm of or appYl or varlan0•a as it d••Y mgaaarf to twchw the pwpoaY of thin chapNr. 6. Tha City dart shall YSVtain the ncorda of all •ppaal actlout and sport avy varlYC•a tc the Fkml Oa•rgnny Muugwot Agkay upon nguaat. e. Cokitlo•a [or Yarianeaa 1. pariancaa Yy W Safuk for LM racOYtnotlon, rahaD311tatim or natenttm of atnetuna liatk m CM patioYl A•61atM of fllatorlo Plawa ar cha State Inventory of Alatorio Plu•a, vithout ngard to CM procaduns aaL forth to [M rbalndk of tAL aktim. 2. Parlamaa shall mL W iasuk rlthfa spy dYtpatk [looawy 1[ ,ny lncrus• In flood lewla awfK !m GY (loco dLaDarp mould rpult. 3. Parianws atoll only M issued upm • d•uraiaacaon tDat tD• rariaem to CN a1nLm n•c•aaary, coYid•ring CM flood haaard, W artdro nli•t. V. Pulancu aNli mly W Saauk upm a. ahovlog of good W auffic!•ot eauY auoD as renoraLlm, nDa0111tae1o0 ar nCOOatrv~eeim. parlaaa•a faauk for konoaie CopaldaratloY, uatDetloa, k bkaua• varfavcu hen b•Y oak So LD• peat an mt pk and euffioiene caws, D. • tlrtaratYtlop that hilun td O'ant CDe varlmm mould nault G exca0t10Y1 Dardship ea the applioaaCi apd o. t dkenitutiov tMt CD• grancivg or a rarlanCe viii mt result Sn Ivenaa•d ilok Mipta, addlCSoYl chnRa to puD110 fataty, •rtnordSnary puDlio exp•mar crab nulaaecY, caY• fraud M or HotialYtlm of LM puhllc, or mvfllet v1M exlattnN local law or nhaptera. t• toy applicant to vhoal a varland• Sa grantk alull W given vrtC1Y ootfe• tlut the atruetun viii M paralttk Co W tu11t vifA s lowat tlmr Qantlm b•lor the Was flood el•rattort and that CM C_Olt o[ !load lY111'anW viii M m rte vith tM r k rl 4 rqultias rng CM ow mr • wa m. C. CondltloY or AppYl \ppYl of Yy eOt1o0 of the CSty EnNin•M Yy M wade Dy arty pram M tillry • •rlttk mtlca of aDDaal vith the Clty C1erD x1LDiD tk (10) calendar Wye follovtng nociticatlm of Yid wtiaa. NDSU N appeal Sa pendio(. CM utaDllaDYat of any a[tkek atruotun or uY li k M hold to eDayanw. in h•arlog akD Y appeal, the City CouYil Yy atti(f, afflra !r part, or nvarY cha Dnvious irttorprotaiim •DSOD ig aualkc to appYl, prorld•d that Y appYl is not k M graatk mly ueY nll•r aoumt ahouid otD•rviw M gnotk LDrougp rarlYw or aa•nOYnt of ChL oNDtar. SECTION 21 ih• City Cotboil tike tbat thin OrdldagY U !o tM tea! Snt•nata'o['EfS'puDl3a hY1t0, aaf•ty, and wlfara Oaoulaa !t rill panic property aveks In eM Clty k ottaln [lend M'-ard SdaY1'aoa• aDltlh mould athalYlY mt W walLDla Dut for tM koDtioo of CDSS OrdiDaaaa. This Onimnw !s MNDy dklwd tp N k wpvvy gaY1W, and it aDall tap aff•ot irabNl7 upm !ta adoptlm. i..'~C..:..-- l'•O fZ 1]~~.. ~.i6~1 a•r tL1~u~VJGa vi.~_ Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman MtNTeI opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Comwissioner Chi ti ea moved approval of the resolution. Commissioner Blakesley seconded the notion. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CMITIEA, BLAKESLEY, EMERI CK, NCNI EL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY + r * r + ~ --carried F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND iwnusiara corm crr of au iurunr<ur o, ua - V 1 ~ 1 llr NANl;MJ GUGAMONfiA - M aNen Il~ien rellpve roA n s r a rea pet c an approximately 80 acres of land on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between the I-15 Freeway and Etiwanda Avenue - ADN 229-031-01, 16 a 20 and portions of 229-021-57 Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman MtNiel opened the public hearing. Since there were no public coaeaents• the oublic hearing wan clncnd Commissioner Blakesley moved approval of the resolution, Connaissioner Chftiea seconded the nation. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CMITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY ++++,.• --carried G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 5996 _ DAVID - su v s on o acres o an n o parce s rn ery ow dwelling untts per acre) Residential Development District located on the south side of MTlson Avenue, east of Mayberry Avenue - APN 201-181-59. Related File VA 87-08. DRArT FCi2 C1~C,;3~„„~ Planning Commissfon Minutes - 10 - July 22, 1987 DRAFT OR D1scU5SiC~ P1J~l?v'JC.rI OMLY H. VARIANCE 87-08 - BOWDEN - A request to reduce minimum lot depth and minimum ne average a area for a 2 acre parcel in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located ont he south side of Wilson Avvenue, east of Mayberry Avenue - APN 2U1-181-59. Related File TPM 5996. Barbara Kroll, Assistant Civil Engineer, presented the staff report on the parcel map. Nancy Fong, Associate Planner, presented the staff report on the variance. Chairman M[Ni el opened the public hearing. Mr. David Bowden, 1441 North Campus, owner of the property, stated neighbors had petitioned against the subdivision when filing the tentative parcel map. Since then, he has dropped the tenative parcel map the Commission adopted Lhe resolution to change the zoning fro Low- Mediw to Low Density at the time W comply with the existing zoning of before. The resolution was passed in 1985. He was under the impression that since the zoning was changed because of the people involved was Lo keep the two properties separate and now the Commission is proposing to connect them together. They had proposed this before and now the tuning has changed. He is against the Planning Coamission decision to change the zoning back to half acre lots, putting the two zoning lots back together. Mr. Randy Davis, 751 Cabrosa, stated the street should have been a cul- de-sac originally and he is now opposed to running the street through. If the street runs through, they would have to enter through the lower tract because of the way the temporary street gets closed off. The houses down there are worth alai less than the upper section aM the t ra ff it inr roaco .,,.,ne n. ...~~~.~-- ..~~-,. . ___ ..__._ -_ .-,.,,, ..~ ..y ......, uc to tot iy uypWes. Mr. Peter Granger, resident at corner of Mayberry and Wilson, stated ne felt there was a problem with the Cabrosas taking it down south. He was concerned about the zoning changes and the traffic flow in reagrds to the school children going to Hermosa. Mr. Bill Jones, representative of the Jones family, stated he was very opposed to the street going through affecting the children on the way to school, the zoning changes, and the increased traffic. They were one of the petitioners against the building of small houses. Today they have the half acre lots, attracting some very nice homes. He stated he was in favor of the Bowden subdivision but with the use of cul-de-sacs and not a through street. Mr. Bowden sta*ed there was a compatibility problem with the variance, arising from connecting the two zonings. This was the reason for changing the zoning initially to keep the zoning between the two properties apart. Chairman Mc Niel closed the pu611c hearfng. - - -.~_. - ~ ~~ ~ ~. Planning Commission Minutes - 11 - July 22, 1987 or-,.aFr r _ I~Jl2 UIJ 1rUJ:JiV~ "~.~t'~~•.J_u C Cow•issioner Chitiea stated that Engineering has some very good reasons about connecting for access. She observed that the project to the south is very large, considerably more dense, and designed with its own internal road system and she believes connecting through this project would encourage the higher density to use this neighborhood as a short cut up to Nilson. She is in favor of the development as proposed and because of the impact of the neighborhood to the south on this particular area, she would not support the recommendation by staff. Cowissioner Emerick supported Comaissioner Chitiea observations and stated the effect upon the variance of the applicant is requesting with a cul-de-sac design is minimal and he supports the variance with the cul-de-sac design. Commissioner Blakesley discussed fire access and understands engineering point-of-view but does not have an objection to leaving it as a cul-de- sac. Coawissioner Chitiea added that the map should have some notation that the placement of the structures should not preclude horsekeeping. There is a 10 foot trail easement on the west side of the proposed development. Coraissioner Blakesley agreed this was an important notation. Chairman McNiel responded to the question to the changes of the density stating that to the east and to the west are currently compatible densities. To the south is where the problem occurs, however. Access through here, though not most appealing to the residents, is possibly safer than shuttltny the children over to Hermosa. Coawissioner Chitiea stated there are sidewalks all the way up Hermosa. ~. Chairman McNiel stated that in terms ~ fire access they da need more than one access point. Commissioner Chitiea moved approval of the resolution as proposed with the notation of equestrian trails on the map. Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, stated the resolution needs one more modification for staff's alternative with the following language: 1. Temporary access to Nilson Avenue: a. A standard 30' wide caaaaercial drive approach shall be constructed en Nilson Avenue b. The temporary access shall be designed and constructed to suppport public service vehicles. The pavement shall be a minimum of 26' wfde. Planning Comaissian Minutes - 12 - July 22, 1987 Gr2AFT - ~ ~ OR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY c. A 30' wide easement for public service vehicles shall be provided by separate instrument. d. The tesporary access to Nfl son Avenue shall be removed and the effected trafl and street improvements along Nilson Avenue constructed at the time in the future that an alternate access fs provided. An agreement to this effect secured by a lien agreement against Parcel 1 shall be executed to recordation of the Parcel Map. Commissioner Emerick seconded the motion of approval. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CNITIEA, EMERICK, BLAKESLEY, MCNI EL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONE?S: TOLSTOY . w + ,t ~ --carried ITEM H - Commissioner Blakesley saved t0 approve the resolution, Commissioner Chitiea seconded the motion, Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY + + x x . : --carried I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONIDTIONAL USE PERMIT 87-25 - DURK q request CO eStdDli Sh a 9ymnds C5 st Oo wl 7n n US r d ark District (Subarea 6), totaled at 8656 Utica Avenue (M200) - APN 209- 142-18. Nancy Fong, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman MtNtel opened the public hearing. Ms. Rosann Burk, 8324 Vineyard, ME, Rancho Cucamonga, addressed the main issues of parking and main hours of operation. Parking requirements are '- pins 'the maximum needed. Main hours begin at 3:30 (private iessons) with the busiest hours after 5:30 p.m. Commissioner Chitfea questioned about sound attenuation. Planning Commission Minutes - 13 - July 22, 1987 ., PETITION TO THB RANCHO CUCAMONUA CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned, are opposed to the proposed realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive ae set forth Sn the attached document, paragraph 7.1.3. We are opposed to this change because: 1. No direct communication on the proposed change was sent to the residents of this area. 2. Adequate study of alternative solutions was not given. We hereby request the city to analyze and present additSonal alternatives for an "efficient and safe" transition to Foothill Boulevard to the area residents. Date Sinned Name (Mr., Mrs., or Me.) Address Telephone p ~~yy~~~ ~ ~(~' ~ `>-!C- 7 ^ ' ~ ~» . fir'-~z-,>-.~>~.~ Sys, .. ~" ., .. .,.~-T,~~,i~ll nszz5~ A ~ ~'~~~ ~ .r -u.~n ~R,'~ P~b.' G~~? / 1. ~~. ~,. z i ..! 1 ~/ '. ~ , l i i i ~L ~ -~ .. .. ,;. i /~/ y 1 7.1.2 Access Control Program Business contiguous to Foothill Boulevard wrrendy realize no access restrictions. In addition, existing fragmented parcel configurations promote a multiple of con- flicting access points which disrupt traf- fic flow by .:ausing increased side fric- tion. A recommended program of access coot: ais, consistent with current city access policies regulating access point, driv!:,ay cgs, xnd their location from on another; including the provision of reciprocal access agreements, and special vehicular access controls, (such as right- in, and right-out islands) is necessary due to the following: o Increased vehicular traffic capacity; o Increased perception of safety; o Reduced vehicular traffic wnflict paints; and o Reduced vehiclelpedestrian conflict points. 7.1.3 Red Hill Realignment Currently, Red Hill intersects Foothill Boulevard at an awkward angle. Due to this existing configuration, Red Hill will be realigned in order to promote an efficient and safe transition to Foothill Boulevard. A preferred alignment was selected the following the consideration of other alignment scenarios. The selected alignment is shown on this page. ~~_ ' p o ~,, ~ ~q ..~ ~~~T I~ _„ ~,::: , :~b~~ ~ f ~~~J '- o ,~. ~~ ~ ,, ' ~ i ,~ ~~ , , -~ r~ ~ rl _,T~ I Radhlll Raallanment ~-::,., ~r I "~ hi ~~`~ l l i i ~r/i t i '~ fly, 06/12!87 CIRCULATION CONCEPT