The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1987/10/21 - Agenda Packet • CITY COUNCIL A G E N D A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:30 p.m. October 21, 1987 Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga r~• City Counciimemben Dennis L. Stout, .Nayo. Pamela J. Wright, Ne~n.r.Pnm Deborah N. Brown, co~~lrlm.mb<. Charles J. Buquet, co~~~um.ms<. JefTrey King, co~~orrm.mal. •~• Lauren M. Wasserman, cm~aa~aB.. James Markman, cor~ Urumeu Beverly A. Aurhelet. t,,; rr.,r; City 08ice: 989-1851 Lions Park: 960-J14.° • City Council Agenda October 21, 1987 PAGE • A. CrLL 3D Om>Z 1. Pledge of Allegiame to Rag. 2. Roll Cdlt Brorn Bnquet , Stout _ _ Bing _, and Ntigbt D. /laO~liOi 1. Prreoution of proclauHon declaring October 25-33, 1937 u Red Ribbon Neek i¢ auppert of the car on drag abuN. C. 0000[ tli~ 'tw ~telleriq Oeaaear Oe1~Yr ite~a era e~eatN ro M rortir err M-awts~snLl. sq mill to aetH lea y~ tM Os~ril ae aaa ttr dtfwk riaawiw, 1q its rg 1» teawsat b • busila~ly ar aaYre ar t!a aeii~u ter dlsswia, 1. Approval o! Narraaty Register Mo'a. 10/07/87 and ~ 10/14/87 and Pgroll ending 30/M/B7 for the total rouot of 81.982,740.62. 2. Alcohol is De-rrage Appl icatiaa tar On Sale Dur i Niw 14 Eating Place, Joe'• Piau, lMudy M. 7aq 9653 Dau Line Road. 3. Alcehol is Denrarap Appl icativo for Do Sale Deer i Nina l6 Eating Plue, Mw Mend ~ineae Reataarant, Michael T.L. Gn i Philip R.P. tan, 7890 Rarw Arenae, Ihtit I13 i 116. 4. Approval to qult[laia • poetian of Lot D, Trot Mo, lg 13058 to Th• Nillir Lyee ~Mn7 toe the porpou of its incorposatioa rith the school site rithla the Victoria Grace Oeanmity located ruterly of Milliken Avenue, betrun Due Line Rwd and Sighlud Arenw. i f'r.-i4i~ Y~~ L PAGE • o' p,, + City Co~mtil Agenda ~~~.~~ Ociohat Zl, 1987 ~ 2` RL9Q.OTIOR !p. 87-553 19 ._ A RDDQLDTI011 Or 1HR CCTI WORCII. Or T~ CITI Or RAR~O mG1AHOM CALItORHIA, n'fDR!! or SAN DAIRARDI110, 9TA1E Or CALIIOADIA, ORDE0.IN6 iCl HE QOITCLAI19iD, A POxTION Or LOr H, TRACT H0. 13030 S. Approval to pard and azacata Pratnaional Services 24 Agearrt (fA /D7-16]J with L.D. Ring, Ine. io prepare plane, apacilicatiow and aatlnatu along •ith ~atioua engiwaring atndiaa and field nmrga for Dana Lino Rwd Stott Drain and 9isat Lpto-rru tsr I-13 to vat o! Etbanda Manna. 9ueh Wort to M dorm for a fa not to aaad $dA,HSO to W paid trr 8yatra Daalopnrt rtmd. RmOLOTIDII R0. D7-SSA 35 A R1/OLOTIOI Or rsi C[T! ODNItLRI. Or YIIR GIT! Or R/d10H0 ODCAIDRNA, GLIIbAUA, 10 ~YD AA) ffiWTL A pROrtDSIOW. BIIrIQD ABRAOQi NI'm L.D. RII4. IIIC., Or ONtARIO. CILZrORtIA • 10 YRA7Alt A.AM/, 9rRCIrzq?IDO Alm E6TIl1-'t•/ TOR DA/t LIR ROAD SSORN DRAIII tlDl STRA{T IlQROIAiR'D lRgl I-IS TO Nr/T Or 6TIiAlAA AVANT 6. Apptenal to rand and azacnta prolaaioeal Sarvitaa 76 Agraanaat (~ /D7-163) With DDI Cowtltrta, Inc, to prepare plow. 9panitieationa and RatLataa along with agiaaariog stadia and field aarvga toe 19th Strrt frr Havor to Cartilla A~raa. Bach notk to M done tot • !N wt to auad $38,300 t0 M paid ttr 9yatra Da~alopart rrd. RRBOLDTION ND. 87-SSS 37 A RD9aDTws or Ter LZTt fGOHCQ. op Ter CITt Or RARDHO waUOwsM CALI/ORMIA, 10 lAARD ADD s:ama A pROragamHAL DARIw RORRAmIT ~ WITH DSI WRSOLTAN78, IH6 , 10 PREPAAi pLAN/, spaarzcArlDNS ARD ssTZxars aDx 19~ H14DDY II~R07AN1178 pROM HAUDSA TO GRTILLI AVAND • //~/~ City Cowell Agenda October 21, 1987 PAGE 7. Approval to ward tad azecate Profndowl Service Agrarrt (fb /87-164) fw plario{ tad damp urvicu 38 ;alatin{ to the apytin{ of the Ciiy~• Nuter Ply of Draiup fw the Etisaoy tad Sy 9ovir arer to DSI, Inc. !os the romt of $ffi,000 to bs frdad frr Drain{e P+my •ith partial raiaborerrt ($50,000) free. RDA Pry. 8. Approval to arard tad atecata the Protutiaeal Semen 40 A{rerrt (OD /87-165) fw ffie irpactir urv ter eo the Archibald A~nr Anal igrrt Project to N83/Larq, Soc, for the sort o! $14,712. 9. Approval to e:.eota the coatruc (W /87-166) for the 41 Arr VII Store Dsaia, Phan II Iaprovrrt Proj act raryd to Dralaap Coaatraetir, Inc: lw the wort o! $835.682 to M ltmdad !rr Draiyp Pry. 10. Approval to aaacata Contract mrp Order /2 (m 42 187-020) to ProlMalonal Eez.ieae Agrarre •ith DOA i Maociatr fw Ooatzut Adainiatsatiba 9anicea !w varioaa duip prej acts. It is raeoanandad to expand • their contract ~ $15,000 to bring their contract total to $48,000 to M paid !tr the frdin{ toorcu o! the variou prof acts. 11. Approval o! . Pipel inn Licear babar the Southern 4a raeisic Trarpwtatir Ca{paq tad the Ciq is ceoaaetir eith Tract Na. 13022, located nut of Milliken Avrr, nwffi of Ear Line Erd and alto. the aPProval of u agraryt beber The Nillir Lyr Coapauy, the dwelopar and the City. AEBOLOTIOM N0. 87-536 44 A Af{Q.OTIOE OP T8E QT! OODNCIL OP TEE CITT OP AAM®O mC1101RA, CALI10{NIA, APPRWItA A PIPELINE LIO3N{E DEItiE~ 1NE CIIT ANO TEE SOOT{E{E PACIFIC TAANEIOATATION WNlANT 30R 1AE IN{TALLATION OP 81O{N ORAI11 IACILITIEE WITHIN 1N{ RAII,ROAD EIGNR~OP-NAT IN NN70ECTIOE NIT$ DEVRAPIRNT OP TRACE N0. 13023 (VICfOALA OAWID) .~ PAGE City Council Agenda I October 21, 3987 I 4 12. Approval to azacuta Agreaant (CO /87-167) for 46 Inatallatiw of Pablie LproveaNt and Dedintion babaan Hobart 8ottaaa, Jr. and the Clq of Reecho COCeaoega IOr $erNC lrwtaga LpieaaaNV st 9732 Asrw Hoare. RffiOLOTION ND. 87-537 ~7 A REBQDTION Ot TaN CITS WDNCIL Ol TSN 41'! OR RAA030 mCANDNOA. CALIRORNIA. ACG17'INO AN AOREYNOIT ROR" INSSALLA7ION OR P08LIC INPR09'RIDflIT AI@ DEDI GSION RRON RClRtI' 80?/NAN JI. AID) A0780NIZIRO 78t NASOR Alm 1ffi cz9s a.>vls m amN sAl~ 19. Appsaaal to amnia Iaprovaamt AgraNwt EstNaiw ew 48 parcel IYp 7902. IwaeW N the eu[ aide et NryMrey Maaw, aoath of Nitaoa A~esoe, aebaltted b) Aslo N. Laiz. RmOLOSION 110, 37-SSS 49 A R1aQ,0SI0N 01 18L Q1S CIONCA. 01 I8i CIS! . Di RANao GCAMINA, CALlpouaA, AtpRWL10 IleaaRNNNx KSR>DIIR111' R1SaN3ION Alm INR0IOSNS aNmIIT! /OR PARCQ. MAP 7902 14. Approval to asacata Lpro-aaaoe AgraaaNt Ratanaion tw 50 iTatt 129M, located on Highland, wt o! Mi1111can, ruEaiteed by Marl6eroagh Dnalopuat. RHBOLOS'ION N0. 87-339 51 A RZaCL01RON 01 18H CI1T COONCiL Op THD CLS.'! OI RYfQO COCAMDIOA. CALIRONNIA. APPROpINO IID!ROR'RINOIS a2'I6NaION AORERRII'1' AND SMPROpBRNS SEmRIT! pOg 'IIIACt 12914 13. Approval to aACiaa Lpeweaeat Agrarant and 52 Lprovaaeat SNUrity for Dt 88-33, lacatad on the month •ida OL ai>ah Street, bebean DL1Ca and Cl avalaad i , Avenas, tohaitied by Central gnuina Talley Syatau Dirialoa. • ~"~} 4~ • EJ City Cowcil Agenda October 21, 1987 PAGE RTSOLD'1'IOR ItD. 87-560 53 .. A R~OLUTIOE OT 366 QT! L08NCIL OT 16E CZT! Of RA6B0 WCAIORGI, CALITORNIA, APPRWING IMPRWEMERS AOAEpRIIi ARD IETROVEIOtRT SECTRIIT TOR DEpIg.OPlRRT REPIEW tA. 86-36 16, Appewel to eacvte contract (CO T87-168)foe the Raven 55 Avmoe lNdiau DNatitieatiw, Phua IZ Iaprw~Nt Prof tct frog 4th Street to Arrw Roata arardad to Ruienda Landaupa fw the nowt o! $719,661.8A to 4e forded frw Duatifiutiw TYmda. 17. Approval to accept the Arsw Roate and Ruth Street 56 Lprwwant prof act betrer Tiw7ard~aad Archibald Mwoaa a co~plettt. ralaaN bonds ad aathorise the OLq Entiwae to file a •Ibtiee of Coapletiw• ud ~appeove the fiaal ceatract aewtae of $697,9E0.67. REBQ.DTIOM R0. 87-561 58 A REBOLOlZ011 OT 16E CI1S ODOM4L OT TE1 CI4S 071UN®O WCAIDIRA, GLIAERA, ACaTf21p ' 16E PODLIC ZMfRW~'ID 7DR AAEOtI RODS! Alm NIR1a 81REES IMPRO-QRIR PRO7ECf DESSiE01 pIDE3dRD Alm 1EmiDN.D AVEROY Alm IA.IRi OT A BOTIC< OT O11VLermn ante sae v,.. 18. Approval to accept Lprwuenta, M1eaN o! Donda ud Notice o! Ca~pletios lost DR 86-OD -located 8936 and 8990 Cottap Or1va. 59 Rdwes T~ithfal Perfonance Dead (StrNt) $ 22,000 REDOLDI'ION IR1. 87-362 60 A REBOLOYIOR O1 16i QSS NONCZL OT TEE QTS OT RAMIXO WC~IDMA. CN.ITOEMIA, ACaPIAA 36R PODLIC II4RtAElWI3E TOR DII 86-08 ARD ~ A0780RIZIRO 7EE 1ILIIR OT A R01TCa OT OD1D3.ESROM TOt 16E WORE C~ PAGE ~° S' ,: city Cowcil Agenda 0'e°v`0A$d~ October 21, 1987 6 Trut 12922 -located eqt of Wean Avmste, ttortb of 61 Highland Avenue, and tooth of Lew Avgsr. Releuet Faitbtud Fertonaace Bwd (Sttaet) $100,000 (Stop Drain) $53.000 Accepts Maiatraeace Guargtae Bond (Strgt) $ 10.000 AssaarloH HD. B7-s63 62 e AEBOtorIDE of Ins arz DDDN®L 07 THE (als 07 AANQO OBCUDEDA, GLI70E1RA. ACLi7TIlO THE FDEL1c IlOsROFOmITH ioe a 12922 AHo ADTEOESZtta 1HE 7ILD10 07 s NOTfa o7 OOIQLETIOM BOE THE AO7E 19. Approval to ralgae caah Gpotitt Trot 12679 - LwL Haaq for 8a6divitiw 63 • Ideatlficatlw Sipt $ 628.00 Ttaet 11549-1 - Elalr Hwq for 8ubdivLiw 63 i Idea lice w Sign $ 62A nn 2u. apptovel to atKbotia• the advertlelaE of the 'Notice 64 ImitiaE Bidae toi the Ttattic 3lEad and Setety Ligh tiaE •t hrnellao 8trge and Red Hill Comtry Club Drive cad Cattteliq BtrNt and 7logard Avaatr Lpsmaagt Psoj cot. AE80L0?ION N0. 87-36• 65 A RE60LOTION O1 1HE CiT! LVONSIII. O1 Tffi CLTT OF RAN®0 aJGUO1f;A° CALIgENIA, A7LAOFIAD PLAHB Alm SFEC[-If51TI0N6 70E 1HE aTRA71IC S ICNIL AND 8A7ETT LIOBTIIA AT CAAIOQ.IAN STREET AND AED HILL W'ONQl2 Q,T! OAIpE ANO CARNELIAN STREET AIID 9INElARD A7EIIOia SN 8AID CITT AND ADTAOAIZ II6 Alp/ DIAECLIIB3 '!HE CIT! ~ ~ CLBAR TO AD9EATI8E TD RECE27E EIOH t~~ ~4f, city Council Asaoaa pAGE October 21, 1987 7 • 21. Apprmal to aathoria• the advartiain` of the "HOtica I 70 IavirinE Dida• for th• Trattic Sigaaia aad Sataq LiahelaE ae Bavaa Aranw at Slzth Strut, Have Avaaea it Jazaq Doolavard ud Rau Lion Hoad at 8proca Strut Lpro-rmt Proj ace. R~Q.OT20E H0. 87-565 ~ 71 A RESCLOTIDE 07 THE 4T! OOOHCIL OV THE CST! 01 AAH®O CSCAMOlti1. CALILOEELA. AYFtIWIIA pceHe AID stscln OlTI0E8 t0a THE 'TEAVtlc S$EALB Alm RIVET! LICHTIRi AT HA9EE AVIDNi AT' s2ITH STREET. HAVIDI A9p10E 1T JEREE! EOOLPAED Alm E1BE LIRE H01D AT SPROa 9TREE7~ 1H SAID CITT Alm AOTBOEIEIti 1!m DIIECtIMi THE CITT Q.zQ TO AHIERT7EE 10 RECRVE DIp 22. Approval to aathorL• th• ad-artiainE of the 'Hetiu 76 ImieinE Eida• toe t>t• 'ltattic 8ipual and 8afaq LiahtieE at Haan Avuv aad Civic date Drive • Lpzevaaut Vroj ut aad aothoria• Iha dirut porebua of ai~al polo !os iha prof net bt the Ciq. RESOLOTIOE lp. 87-566 77 A REEQ.OTIOE OIr THE CITT COONCIL Ot TEf CIT! vi wM~6v W~MIMi, ti1LlNaMly artKW llri tLAEE Alm sps¢rznTIDEE H)E lsE `TEAVVIC 9 HSEAL Ilm E1tE1T L)aHTllp AT HAVLI AVOHIE Alm CIVIC C~ Bttivs• IH SAID CITT Alm AOTHOEIZIW Alm DIEECTD4 THE C[T! CL>ai Ib AwnrtsE To EEalve HInE 23. Appre-al of ruotaradatiw raprdiaE provision o! I 82 protusiosal unite to th• City of Rancho Cacuup by H1111~ L. Hollq. 2A. Approval for City HLtoric Ludnark duipnatiu to M I 86 plead on eha Wanu/Thorpa Houu leeatsd at 6112 Kellen Avanra, Raeche Cnesaoaµ, Cal itvrnia 91701 (Atl1 1062-381-CS). ~~ ~ ~ I PAGE a ~~~ City Council Agenda @ 9 b2 October 21, 1987 8 RffiOLS7tI0N N0. 87-567 91 A R®OLO?I01 Ot 18i CIT! CODMCII. 01 TH6 CI1T 0! AAItIXO tACA1tlIGA, GLIlOML1, RICOOIIIZIN3 191 WAR1W1801pi H0081 A8 A SIOtII1I CAMS HL41'01IC tE1t\I111 Ol 18E G[T! OY RANQO OICAlt)RO1 AMD 19811101tt O68Tr.MATI111i IT A9 A CI1T HL99)12C L1tHMA1R 23. Appewal tw Clty HLtoeic Landurt daaiµatlw to M 92 plead on the Minor Hoeaa located ai 10089 8ua Lino Rwd, Rancho Cowonga, Oal itornia 91730 (APM 1077-0f1-57) . RDOL01T01 M0. 87-368 _ 95 A A~OL1Ti01 O1 TH1 CiS! 0001CII. Ot 181 CI'tf 0111NO10 WGIDIRI. OILIl011L, 11g01RLII16 191 MIIOI H0011 A! A 12610:li OARt 1711DlIC !1Al01i 01 TH1 C[S! 01 R1N080 O9CYDIpA 1101 18n10011 DiY111ATII0 I? A8 A C1S! HHi9AIC LAIO1MA11 • 26. Approval toe City Hiatwic Landaa:k daaiµatian to M 96 plead oo the q~qw Litf Oak 14aa lacatad at 12191 8ua Lino Rwd, Reecho Caaaaenµ, Oal itoenia 91730 (ARI 0227-091-21 and 0227-091-20). R880LOTI01 MD. 87-369 101 A 8180LOS101 OY 191 CI41 OWMCA. Ot TH1 CIT! Oi RAMOHO WG1101C1, C1LI10RML-, R1006HIZIIR 181 G11l01 Lflt OAC YRE1 AS A 9ID11I1ICJ14 HI810RIC T6A20R O! 191 C[1S 01 RY1030 mCAlt)101 AADt T~tt011 D08 HiMATIl4 RAH A CS1T 1I81OlIC L11m1A11 27. Approval to anthotis• chanµa of the daaiga o! Chic 102 CfnUr ud Yoblic 8ataty facility and antheris• ehuµ ordara to lapltant chuµa for Darty Oonatsactiw. ~ i i ~ 28. Approval to aubatitnR• the lw tin oT MarLan 6 105 Aret7oaki for Covingew i 4tw raµrdinl the la7auit of ROCCO~^ Mhol alalf COtporatlw, at ll, YfraV/ th• City of Ranehe Cocuwµ (NO. 10716). • ~~t 0. p~Gb °pcil A8;9 7 Ci ~c~ bst 21. ~~ l09 30' ~ps ~f 52A 3s20 1 bids aw= Ca-ci 9~ 6b4 46 °£ 11p anO~ aces4b saucy' ~O s af°~IDt of ~°vs1 Lo ~°+-7' of gcs°c mop. 'i° ~ 8 19a ~~seiall Do. acis OT°°s ~~ • ~°s4 t' 8.iis • c~ ooh cu i. at 41~•of C~~c'7 Satyic°~ ut ~• 110 m 19 Nom` C of ~p]caP bi ~~ n•E asG~ 11f8• f nc ~c f.os "Z sac 32 • ~ ~b ~s Cnsp°~s i~ N3 ~a a~+ ~t 3alV Apyp-~i°p „5 32. 8s. Q~Sfi g6 M~sydtipC~ Discsicc KO' ~yc-W ~ 81'Sj0 Q'tti 8. 4ffi ~p9 ~' NCQ' Ot 1rt6 Ot OL R8s CIS ~ GS.S~~~yIN~~y A A~ ~ O Ot ~ wtM ~ 8 ~ y111DS ot~~T~a.s ~1.a xa, ~ ai+t~sN~~a 9y5 you ~' 81,51 of tas cS~ ZSQ'~p W~D~ otVp 'Mt~a ~~03 8119 1 At ~~.r'[iD~..wiC1-i16 ~938~~1p ~L~ '14E ~" 1~ 1 ~ ~is'ntc';~0~~°.~asoA~g7i rJ~ Z~ * A8 ~~NO. 3' ottp 8T~8IlG 8ti~ 918 Q 08'~' A ~ R 122 124 use~"~µ'ca ~ y uro ~' m l111 ~g1lC' d TII'm tO ~dpOs y1_~1i.`9,8'nStP 1¢40 4. 1q8~ SiY L°c syW ~Jtt~TQlorB tOS i1w+bLiBbdpBd at ~p9KS°c. pblic bat~pd gt RNi~ 1Aspw apyiM 8~~ct9 93• 8y~11~~~NNSa tsr18 su1~s~.t ~~d AVSpVS• n Civ pW tpslij° gtcss° Ksvap A~p~• D~tsilisn ,. ,.` 8C1'~ DYivs. Wd ,_ l~~i "~Y PAGE City Council Agenda Cctobar 21, 1987 ID_ RE80LDTIDN ND. 87-572 125 A RESCLOTION OP 19E QT! fbONC[L OF THE CZT! Or RAN®0 WGlDNGA. CALIrOEiRA, APPawING A!ID SETTItG A P08LIC REARING DATE OP NEDN~DAl, NwElm~ 4, 1997 POR 1N6 TRAfrIC SIGNALS AT 9Z2 LOGTIDN9 ENPIRONMmITAL ASSffiSMENT D. OOAIa ADI.YIm ~ lollaaria~ tMianaaa beau hai public Yaariap at the tiaa of that taatla9. eased sWiap era-a>NaiM Co b. reatir ad aw-ewtewfrtlat. 7bq sill ba aotM qua bF t!a Oeuail at ar tiaa fdtlwt disewiaa. ta• Oltf Qsek frill surd tM title. Aq itaa w w raawd es diaesaiaaa 1. ENrI1WNDINtAL A85ESBMEIR AND DE9II.DPIRIR DISTRILT AlQIOIaMt 97-09 - C[T! of EANOHO WCAIE)NDA - An • uandaut to chop the Da-alopaut Diattict daaipatiou tray the asiatiaa daaignationa to loothiil Bontavard Specific Plu (t. fi. P.) foe all ptopartiu adjutant to foothill Doalavatd eras 6rafa Manua to Dear Crank manual ad trw the Z-15 h'aftra! to 6aat Avenue ~ithia the foothill boulevard Specific Plan atfa. ORDINANQ N0. 323 (second rudinE) 127 AN OEDINANa DT THE RAN~O CDGlDRGA CIT! CCDNC[L APPRwZlE: DID/ELOPl~ET DI9TAICT AMEN40DIT ND. 97-09, A R~0®T TO AIRIW TRt DEpELOPNENT DISTRIC! NAP rItCM TBE ffiSTTNG ^GC" (CII7MAL ODla`RCIAL), 'bP" (DPRe/PEOra68I0NAL), ^N" (MEDIBM DENBITT REB ZDENTZAL). "rC" (fL00D CONTROL). "29 P^ (INDDBTEIAL AREA SPEQTIC PLAN, AND ^69P" (ETDiANDA 9PECIfIC PLAN AN6NDM6NT) TO ^!8P" i i i i (PLt01NII.L BOBLEPARD BPECIrIC PLAN) rCR Sb0 AD&~ 01 LAND (S~ EEEIDIT "A") AUTAQNT TO P00'DaII.L BODLErARD DETiIEBI GROPE AlENEE AND DEER IXffi f71ANtffi. ANb BESNEmf THE I-IS PREH9A! AND EAST ATENBt NITRIN T9E r00THII.L BODLErARD SPEC[12C PLAN. • ~,'__tr ~4 „~ ~ PAGE i~ ' • t~ y/ City Covcil Agaada - •`'e g .ky~ October 21, 1957 l 11 r~ LJ F.. J 2. 0!!-SITE SDEDIVISION DIREC1ZOtW. SIGNS - M a~ec~mt to Sactiw 14.20.063 of the Rancho Cocuwp Municipal Cede partainint to otbsita anhdirLiw diraetioaal eigoa riNin planwd coanviriu. ORDINANCE NO. 309-A (aacond seeding) AN OEDINAMC6 O! TBE CITt OOONCII. OT TEE CITE O! R1M030 OICAMDNDA, CALITOg1IA, ANE!®I}C TITLE 14 OT TRA RAN®0 mCANDNGA lRiNiCIPAL mffi PERTAI112N: 10 SIGNS 3. AMENDMQlt TO SECtION 30 O! TIID MODRCIPAL OOD6 ESTAELIENIW 8T® LIM2'ID TA011 TmRA VISTA PARRSIAS 29 tASR Llli ROAD TORIQ A AA AV614A AIa CNORCH S ' ORDINANCE N0. 321 (aemed teadiat) 131 AN ORDINANCi 01 TRR CiTt ODONCIL OT THA CiT! OT AAA030 WCAID~A. gLIIORIfL. AMLNDIItI 9ECTIOM 10.20.020 Ol TNA PAY®0 mCAMDwiA ~ MDNICIPAL mDt An/RDIN6 PRIMA HC[i SPELD LIMPID DPD11 ~TAI11 C[TS STRRilE L ADTRSfim l~LLC 1f11I10 7W tollwiet itaea Yen heat alraseiad aa1/w peered u public heariata u rKdtrd h1 lw. Sie Quit Atli opr the artier to teeelre pablia tettiaoq. 1. EMiR.ONOiMt-L ABStSBlR1P! AND VICTORIA 00lMONIT! PLAN 134 AMENDMEIR 07-02 - DILLIAN LION 001@AN! - A regwat to champ the and uu and aonint dulpatiwa trw Madiv (4-14 drallint vit• par acre) and lbdly-Kith (124 drallint vita par acre) Auidantial to Lw-IYdiv Ruidantial (4-8 8relliat vita pat acre) !or • 24.67 acre parcel rithin the Victoria Pl aoaed Caeavity, located at the notthrut corner of Victoria Patk Law ~ ~ and Niliikaa Areaua - APlf 202-211-13 snd 14. ~~ City Comcil Agenda October 21, 1987 PAGE ORDINANQ N0. 325 (first zudi¢g) ~ 135 AE ORDINANQ 01 THE QTI Op RANQO Q7GNDIi,A. GLItORNIA. APPRWING VICTORIA WNMONITi PLAN AND7DIeNT R7-02, REQOEBTIM. A QAIL'B IN 1HE LAND OSE DES ICNATIONS PROM MBDIDM (14-24 DWELLIt71 DNI79 PER AQE) AED MEDIOM-H1DR (14-24 DMD.LING DNI1$ PER AQE) RESIDENTIAL SV LON-NSDIDM EES IDBNTI/E, (4-8 DNELLIIL• DNI1B PER AQE) POR A 24.67 AQE PAR GL WITBIII THE VICTORU PLANNED Wl9DNITT, LOGTBD AT TSE NQ'ffiNEBT WRNQ OP VICTORIA PARR LANE AND NILLIEEN A9ENOE - APN 202-211-13 2. ENVIROEIRNtAL A88BHSMRMt AID TBN1L1'IVE -TRACT 13541 - 136 aALLMAR - ~~ruideat~ial MaubdirLCi~on~oiwdralwi(12) ainBl• trip lots u 4.9 ecru of land is th• Lw Ruideatial Diantct (2-4 drtlliaE miu par acra). located north of Eed Hill Comtry Qub Deice at 3lerra Vista - APl 207-411-10, 207-OSO-OS sad 4B, 3. TBEE RIDgVAL P~IQT 87-43 - DENOaD - Appeal o! the 198 • PlemiaR Cwalssiw'^ daeia w deayisR the moral of ela~en (11) Eecalyptns ucnlan ner located in the rur yard of 9338 Cala Mum -APR 202-111-69. 4. BNVIRORIRNtAL A98ESSIONI' ABD DEVQgplOtyt RE9IEN 57-2A - 277 J. B DEVD,pIIQMt - Appeal of the fl ng CwaLrio¢~• decision requisinR ludacepinE and iniptiu o! Ma freerry siSht-al-rry donE the project bomdary for the de-alopaent o! thirteen (13) i¢dustsial hulldinge total inS 507,423 graze feet m 29.4 uzu of land in the Cemral Industrial District (Subaru 8), logted on the aoatheut corer of Arror RouU end Rochutar Avum - APN 229-121-19, Z3 throuSh 26. 5. BIflI1tONNENI'AL ASSE88MEN! AND GBNDIAi. PLAN AlONDMBNT 27~ 87-04C ARMA}BOE DEVEfgPMEN1E INC. - A rgmst to red eb• Lud DN Brut of the Cewral Plu frm Flood Control and Lor-lYdir Density Rsaldantial (4-8 drallinE min par acrq fer 6!c acres of led locand ae the aouthrue corner of Huyr and Millilwn - APN 201-271-55. L. J ,-ri=; ~'. ~~~ . ..~ • J .~ i / P.~GE ~ ~at~~~ City Council Agenda 0• td October 21, 1987 13 RE9Q.DTION ND. 87-573 _, A RQBOLIITION OP TH6 CIT! ODONCIL Or 186 QT! 08 AAN®0 07GNDM,A, GLINIANLA. APPROVIlC A R~0~7 1D AMRID TH6 LAtID DSE NAP OP THE GENatAL PLAN, CPA 87-01. PRON FLOOD WNTROL AND r01VAE NIGH SGOOL SITE 10 LQi-MBDIIfN RE6ID6NTIAL (FS DNII.LLEi IINIT6 PEA AQE) POE APPAOIINATELT 69.7 AQEB Or LAND LOGT® ON THE SWTRNINT mRINOt Or MbLIEEN ATENGE AtID HANlAl1 STREET, RAN®0 fAG10NGA. AND MAR l1NDIIr:.S IN SGPPOAT THERIOT SNVIRONIRNtdL ASSE6HMENT AND DEVII.O!lRNT DISTRICT 315 7 AM6itI1QN! 5 -0 N DEPEfpARNTS. INC. - An tppl tiu to aNad the Dhtioputt atsiet IYp frw Flood Control aad INdlm Dtaairj Ruidnntitl (5-1• Arallln5 mitt ps urt) to LorMadim AuidtMitl (1-5 drt111nE mien per aert) ror 63 ecru e! Land, looted on the gut aide of Nillikto Avum, north o! HiR63ud Avum - APN 201-271-SS. ORDINYICR N0. !26 (tint ruQiaE) 316 AN OADINANOr Or ?RE Q1? WONCIL Or TRi CiTr OI RANCHO WCAMDNDA, GLIr0A1RA, 10 AMtpD TNt DWR.OPlOfllt DI571IQE NAP, DDA 57-07. Panty "r1.Wn lAN'ROL" AND RRD2UN AESIDENTIAL• (5-31 ONIISIN6 tlNI1N PEn ACRE) l0A APPROIIMATELT 63.7 ACRIS Ol LAND LOG13D OM 18E SW'ARimT WRNQ 01 MbLII.O AVENGE AND HA1RA11 SIAECT, RANWO WGMON3A, AND MARE PINIE IN 8DrP0AS THEIIOr 6. BNVIRONMENPAL A88ESSMENI AN) G61aAf. PLAN AMEIOIRNP 721 57-0/E - NEIAIQ PROPEATi66 - A rtgaat to nand the Lud tlu 61uut o th• Central Flu Iron Office to NtiShborhood Caarrcial for 3.55 ecru of lud lowttd nu the aout6~ut corner of Lmitt Court and Archibald i i Avuaa - APN 202-IS1-33. ~ti, ~. rJ/ PAGE City Council Agenda October 21, 1987 16 RE;OLDTION N0. 87-37• I 346 A RE90LDTIOM 07 THE CI1T CbONCSL OP T116 CITS OP RANZEO OICAMONGA, GLILbRNIA, DEETINO A RH')DEST TO Al6ND TEE LAND 09E ELENRNT O1 THE G@7mtAL PLAN. AEEEDMEET N0. 87-04E R~D64TIIC A 4IA1GE IN T8E LAND OSE DEB D+NATION PROl1 OPPia 1D NEI6®OREOOp WMMAICIAL POE 3.58 AQ® LOfUTSD ON THE SOOTHBEST fi)AN~ OY LOMITA 070RT AND AROHIEALD A1ENOE - ApH 202-131-33 BNpIRONMElP1'1L A83E88MENT AND D61E1gPNENT DISTRICT 321 AM6R1lOflR 87-03 - NEIRIOI PEOPQ?2E8 - A rpwet to vend the Detelopune Dlatriet ayp frw "OPa (Offlee/Prolessiooal) to eNP (Ileighhorhood Caaarcisl) for 3.58 scrr of land touted as the aoathrest corner of Lwiu Cotat and Archl6ald 1~enne - APN 202-ISL-39. RESOLi1TION N0. 87-373 ~ 348 A R®OLDTIOM 01 TEE CITT fADNCIL Ot 19i QTT . Oi RYQO 07GIDNDA, GLIPORNIA, DEIIlIIf3 DETELOPlD1NT DI3TRI CT OBAICE N0. 37-03, REDOtBTIIA A OSAMG6 IN 1NE DIBTRICT DEB ION-TI011 PEOM 011102/PROlE88I0NAL TO NEI6ga0EE000 OD!!QC[AL N1E a.SS arnee LOGTtD ON 1Ni SODTd1iEBT OIENER 01 LONITA WDRT AND AE031sILD Ap®I06 - A1N 202-131-33 7. NtBIDEMTION 01 COtlHfMiT! DEpEIgPMENT DI40I GMNT J50 HOOBIN(i A8828TAN06 PLAN - Apptgal L recowndad for the 39H -88 Rowing Aaslstance plan rhich is the third annual lur~ent of me three yus plan zpaited of participuH io the Ooswit7 Deeelopnent Bloct Grant progrt• of the Department of Reusing and Drbsn Develo{aent. 8. BNpZRONMENTAL A98E88MEMf AND DEpELOP101NT ~D6 AMENDMENT 356 87-01 - CIT! O1 RANf~O QICAMDIOA - An amendment to Titl• 17 of the Municipal Coda parUioing to the datiaition of State undated seryel ine tacit itiee and the criteria for design, location and operation of such facilities. s ~~~ _~ PAGE City Council Aguda October 21, 1987 IS • RffiOLOTION N0. 87-576 370 A ASSQ.OTION Or TEE CIT! OOON(D.L Or THE QTT Or RAN09o WCAIDNGA, CALIlORNLA, APPRWINi DWELOPlID7T Q1DE M09NIRpT 87-01 ADDING SECTION 17.00.080 10 ~E DEpELOP!ffiIT ~W OP sea C[TT or RANao cntaAwNCS PERTAINING m STATE MANDATED RECTCLIt;s OENTERa WITHIII WMMERCIAL AND OrrIR ZONES ORDINANCE NO. 327 (tint rndiaE) 771 AN ORDINANa Or 1RE Q1T WONCIL 01 THE CLiT Or RANOHO atG10MiA, GLIT0R11IA, ADDING SECTIOE 17.0 A.080 10 1Na R611IX0. wGIONiA IDNZQPAL OJDE PERTAININi 19 7NE RPIEW AND aHSeELIamsN~t or EELtmIw rsclLlsnE WITHIN ~ Rn or EAN®o IACMDIDA 9. 6NVIRO1ERxtAI. ASSE88lRNP AID IBayAINS Or • tDGATIV6 376 DEC4EATION lOR TEL rROPOEID EbE LIEt ROAD WIDENING PR0.Ta@ - CITr OI EANfAD WfwIDIDA - It is rec d that the City Oeuneil appro-e the attached Ruelutive appro-inj the Eaisosental Aa^eaaaent and Iuuaace of • Neptive Reel asaHve !oe the proposed Dua Live Road WideninE Project Masan Hellatm Aveov sad Archibald Avuoe. R®OLDTION N0. 87-577 389 A R®OLOTION Or THL CIT! QRiNCIL Or THE QT! Ol RAN030 Q1f91DN0A, CALIIORNL, APPRWING 1116 ENratONNENTAL A88®8l~PP INITIAL 81DDT AND ISBDANQ Or A NNiATIpi DEQ.AEAMON IDE THa PROP08® RASE LINE AOAD WIDENINi PROJEQ 10. ENpIRONl~tR'AL A88a8SMENT AND ISSDAMfB Or A NRGATT9E 390 DEQ,ARATION rOR PROP08ID ARROD ROOT6 PHA86 I REODN9TROCPION PROJECT - CITt Or RANCHO COGIpNCA - Th• projece locative is Arson Route. north ai • Maeen Archibald Avanut and Turner Avenue. ~e propoud iaprov~enta coosiat of ridaaina the north aide of the ' ' ' ' ~ strut to its u1tl~aa vidch nhlcb incluMa th• cveetructive of Portland Caent Concrete cvtM, i gutters, aidevalb and drive appruchn. uphelt concrete pavaaut and the lutellaHve of art lights. -r~~`~ .,,{~ .- "C~` r,,. PAGE City Council Agende October 21, 1981 1~ RESOLOTION N0. 37-573 403 _ A RESOLOTION OP THE GTTT CbONQI. OF TA6 CIT! OF RANao mG11DNGA, CALI1bRNIA, APPRCAIIt: 1HE ENPrnoIa~NTAL ASSasSlMM' INITIAL 91V02 AND ISSOAMC6 OP A 17Q:ATIVE DECLARATION IqR THE PROPOSED ARA03 RODTE PHASE I PRQTECT 1. POELIC EEAEI~iE T!a tollaeiet iteY Yen r le®al pltisatiaa as Patwi reEdrerete. lAe owls eill ops tYe eeetist to rwiee PaLliA teeti~op. 1. FIRET READIED OP M OEDINANCE RVEALIR CHAPi'Ol3 08 Ol 404 T~ RAIICND COOIim MORICIPAL QDDE AND Alm ADDING A NES 3.0E E6 POR IIR. OEDIEANO E0. 323 (!irn retdie~ 405 • AN ORDIWa OP TEE QT! CCOIICII. OP THE QT! OP RYIQO QiG1DEpA. CtLIR1RAIL, RREALIip CRAPTEE 3,03 OP THE RANQ80 iUGlDN61 MONICIPAL 070E Alm 1DDIN6 M/i OHAPPER 3.03 10 TH6 RANIXO mCA1R11RiA MINifTf~I m~ wr,µ~, 'iV LNR09A6IN6 2. APPEAL PROM PEOPERTt Olil~ O1 STAFF'S ACTION TO HAVE 413 BLOQ WALL REIm9m FROM RILUID6 AD POELIC RIGHT-OtWAT LOCITED ON THE SOVIH BIDE Ol NILi,SIDE ROM. WEST OP Mi CANTON WAI. 3. FLOOD DAMAGE PREVEIflION - AMEIDlRN! TO CHAPTM 19.13 OP 429 TiQ RANCBD COCAMOM)A MOIC PAL WDt TO T WITH CMH068 IN TH6 FEDERAL ENC! NANAGENEM' ACENC! S REGOGTIONA. ORDINANOE N0. 329 (Brat swdiaE) 431 AN ORDINANe Os THE QTT WDMCIL OP THE 4ZL i i i ~ Ot RANOPO OICYONIA. GLIARNIA, AME1mIN6 OIIAPTl4 19.13 OP TE6 RANOHO W CAM014A MOIi1CIPAL O3DE, PROVIDING FOR FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION Alm DEfI.ARIMi IIIE ORCRILT TREREOP /~,.` r C~~ • • PAGE i e ~ City Cowcil Agenda o h'~i 3` October 21, 1987 17 '4. SMINENI DOMAIN ACTION TO AmDIRE POELIC RICRI~OFNAS AT 466 9611 EILLBIDE ROAD APN 1061-571-01 FOR TBE OQtBTRDCTION Ol 31Or11 DRAIN AfO STREET `~5. ORDERZIE3 THE mNBTROCTION Or pOELIr I!@ROVIDtaN18 AT 468 9611 HILiSIDE ROAD. APN 1061-571-01 LN ACWRDANCE NITN i THE CALIFORNIA CDDEB FOR STRERT9 AND RIGBEIASS. 9ECTION3 5870 AtD 5880 MDAE COMMONLY ENDNM AS CEAPTEA 27 OT TeE IMPROVElRNF ACT OF 1911. REBOLOTION N0. 87-579 470 A REEOLOTION OF THE CITZ CDONCll. 07 TR6 CITY or sAN®o mcuoNCA. CALIFORNIA. oRDEAINC lsE mNETRDCFION Or PODLIC INPR09ID®I'ls AT 9611 EILLSIDE A01D, APN 1061-571-01 IN ACmRDWiCR HITH IDE CALIFORNIA mDEB FOt 8'DAEE~ AND ' HD38NAYE, SECTION 5870 AND 5880 MDRE OOMIDNLY RNOFN AS ~ 27 Or THE IMFROVOmIT ACt OT 19L1 a. clsr NAFF18'Y~E ETdtE RFFNIRS ma loilsiy itana do not 1ag31)• tpdsa erq pnDlic tertiary. allfe~V N.. ~~~~ _~ -~~ w- ~:ily iw peAO.ia ieprt. 1. REOOfBT ZO SNAP LAND AT AACBTEALD AND 19TH STRFOLP roA 47l mN17tIED1TONE IN AID Or m1A3TA8CFtON FOR Tes ARCBIDALD REALIONMEIR - Mporr on a rpoaat to wap land tDat rii- 1 ~d foe Rovca 30 rift-ot-rq is raAanq !oe relict lsaN eoatriDntiwa in aid of coaatrvcrion for the ArchlDald Raal lgoaaat. ~' 2. A REPORT OM THE PROP08/0) ANTENNA STOD! FOR INQOSION 473 INTO 111E PLANNING DIVISION 1987-86 WAE PROGRAM. ~; 3. mNB IDEAATION TO ADD YORCHABE 0! H008E AND LAlD AT 5702 478 AME 9T AVEIR/E FOR 8111VRE RIGRT-OFNAY FOR NILSON ~ I A9ENOE TO T8E CAFZTAL INPIt0OH7CFIM' BDDOBY SYSTEI! i DEVEfAPMIPt POIEI. APPROVAL TO OPEN ffiCRON TOR TSE AMOUNT Or 210.000 FLOE mSY9 FOR AmDISITIOM. FOIIDS To orn~ moM sYaTet+ DsvE1.o roNO. ~~}M1~~.~ ~Y~ 4• "! PAGE City Council Agenda October 21, 1987 1 B. ODO~C[f. D06I1•NB 'tsa lollwtag itwa 1ary bow radoutN b tkn Cltp oewetl fw dtsewaiea, >eq era not alefoa~ tin (AuAir nq apw tho M• ~ tw Pa~ic Tape[, I• RE006H4 m JOM MIRII.B POR CITE PARTICIPATION IN LIBRARI EiPA~ION PR06RAN. 480 2. REPORT m BiIBfA10¢TTda ON lENCIRC AROBlD RED HILL LARK. I. IDI•lIplUTloE1 O! 239N1 IR NCT NNBIITO 't1L L t-a tLa !oe Cttp 6woi1 b idwtl.!>• t!a itwa thq di b dlaaaw at tf<a naet aaattiy, 3aaa itaw Hill ase M dlwaaaad st a1la aartiaC. wl7 Idaatltiai !s W neat wWq. J. mNNIQbSIOi BlOll 4Ba l062C • 7hts is LLa t!y aM plan tw eM «wrd pallle to addewn t!a Qltp Ibwoil. ibp lw priihib W Cttp _ Oaaaail trs __ - ..~ ~~~. W w tYa Apada. iV 1'.l 'Cowan ~ _ ~•~:•:•~~ i.eir.: tp wJ raaaiN taatfawp W Nt ba YLYaa !Of a aakaa~awt ~ I~wwta atn t0 b• ltdtad to !iM aiwtN pQ iadisfdaal. [. 1DJOBN~! I, Hararl~ A. Antbalat, Clt~ Clark o! the Clq of Kaneko Cucwwla, harab) eastit~ that a esoa, aceorata copy o! the foragoiog agaoda .u poapd on October 16, 1987, a~ant~-ao (72) 6oura prior to the uatinE par A. B, 2674 I I I at 9320-C Bua Lioa Rwd. • • H °.. o o° voJJ°JJOO>cor-o °o °~roma ~aooanm •~ OU O N000°000°POrJODUNmmp Jrm0.00 <1 Om m O mmJOOCU00JmW VI~mOggmmm LnfVPO ~ O J mwmmNNNmN'J mPmwOmOrOmrv W 1 N'-rv nNrvnnNnwNN NnWlmlm NO < ~ ~ m a n mmm w .. i i -. .~ < i u 1 . .• .~• ..~<. 0 RI mPJmEOn pnmPOrNnIfNOnWPJrNm1'1l OPmPOwNmlmir L 6¢~ FOOyyl~~a~V~~Y~~~'~YNyrO^mmmmmOmmPPPPPPPP v x 1 r.mi°wn.°.-~w.mi.mmi.°..mim.w.gnm.°.nn~°w.°..°..°.~~wrn.°. °r ni.°..°..°. °w .°.~ U 1 1 1 w PL r n O 1 1 m ~ i a^P w .e m mmmomomm. W i iNi a epp „ _ WW ~ <~^r +C~ m ~~ OO~MTO r ti r^yOm 1 ¢ m rra~Pp01~ ~~W x ~ ww 2 P 1 OPU°iW PPPPPi » ¢ ¢ 9wmW Ws m i mzmz ~ , 1 iuY .°m o J .°.o G2S°ooeoa u: oiu ° m uoe- .n ,<LP ~ ~ <a YJ~'uu~±y~a ~N zs i o J iio ^^ ° \ IUVJVVVVZ ~¢>V m~F ¢Ww W ¢Or •o Ni<. a 1 u siii~i3au¢iW° OJ iii N w°„W ~ N .- m zcaoaooa6'i"oia :'~ .`.fin LL °i^~: oY r OOJJJJJJJZJV r.. ~i ¢ u ~ a uWJ`JJJJJ<n~>..¢woxx °n ~°n ¢aJ^o ° .ao< ««<Nwn ¢.W.1°z"i~.z..z. W it 2q wl w WWW w ` N aW(1<~ a j ¢¢wW<wW W WON<OWLF FAY L 6 ~+~ >~ ~~ J w <NwOLrLL ¢N¢N6J o _J J>NOJ¢N2NY yyY j{ <ywYx6LL i J `¢ N V 00 LTV>V1>~6pJi2 <Y°YWON D V ¢ z ¢` m ,~ u < < N iW i ~ o i i~ i =YZ i < N ° ° s ~ u J ~+ ` _ 1:>6 VUJ~<Z2N .n w N 1 r]i .~ 2 UN5 W ~w>u >NLtiJit L~Y¢Yyu O 1 2 UU u' N Lni° JJV nLL ~+ w~YJ<ZI mOLWW o a J a ¢.cJ <LLmLL Nua°N3LL< jW°W <ofi N J < iaJ ¢~~LwLL uYLL ,"~ ' = JY ~ z a_JY m<<oN° zz o¢a JN°z°a J 6 J « NWQYOjJYwYCO<•piNV r~mN 61< > >U O : VWMNm¢V 'JNTN6NNNSJr1w 6EUWV~ m o ~i ,~ u °°W<a`er<wJw<rm .mz<x VVJJa F ~ '~`~' PO m+m.f mnp nJOm°nPnJNmpm r ~(.l PPP O •mnpnlmliN YgNm<hn r m<Yr LL i w m~ + m~-m-rvrmmru p r N,~mm-i- nnPaasm .~I-- C~ O~~hOYNhrvnNdNN~NOYryryVrm~Y NNmgOPNNNrN^YVOn N LI OJ^mOhNONNNaNNnrvOYryNgamw rOPn+yNNnnmON oahYmrmommmynmPNnmmmnrv nn~mnmNaya-.aNmon.ona ~i nrv n n n n Ki oP^ N rv 6 i' m N Z .OPJ m4nmP0^NnYN mhgPO^NnYm ql-gPOnrymaNVhq JOOJOOOVOO.•^^^^n.+^n^NNNNNryryNryNmnmm~mmmm L RI NNNryrvryryryryryNNryNNryryNryryryN <Y~ mmmemm^m~^m^^^mymm~mmmmtiMmN~mmmgymammmmam n n n nn u JN O ni 2 L L Z 00 Pv L Nm L qn ~- ~ Q a0 < L^ O r + K 1 n¢ O +p i _ miW _ _ OW_ W R• u _ Z KO mSN R aV O O S hm {~'0 UU p u>n '~a ~i ~ i is u u u W Pwu w ma- +m Ne m ao~.->m.. ~<-too NN o0 ~p)Nm 'wnn +Y z ^a Nzm nz ,c nr y ~~ -Yy naiJi iii w. i~z ~O nJ N» 1 O Y• h>m^W ttmrU nJ `i w0` F011 1`i~ 6Wh Jn• ONN ~L ith wiL~N <N 2nNn Nt ti6 rn> aNn OVY ONrywNN ~VNWNN2 NaN 6hnNN NUti 6YnLLNKNY wl SmLLN LLJLLWLL~ NtWLLm< LLOwLLWYWZLL LL< mV LJ LONOTOpOZOOYmVNO+U07060O2pLa%Ol.M1pq pOtJJ JW J6nZR WW2 ZLJSZ3NOwZhOG12WZZW¢ZL rL~Z6V~00 -•~ 'YyYJt~LNi LwN7~UL~~O2ZaLCdpNI~j{F'w0{<wZ7~ 7U04VY >LYYS <YJYY SSWpZNhYGJtiwu w=<¢{aaml{ON L<OwwJ<O< a<LLJ <O{ rn6 ww v.., a..s LL.-naLL+aLn ne"lawrvsiuLLpW j.~N JWmaw<anLass V_ V_ i LL ^ Sn Wnn i '.>: ~ .+ i u s n u Jew 1 i ¢2 V n wV Z N< ; YOV r 1 RY O Zw6 2V2 L J i i w ~ z iu u- s is Wig ' - va2Y ~,W ~ L o~~'"-{uiii`a°zs .iw.4 nWf )wNSw S m<=NJ^ .nY W t yfw6n¢mVW N'nin6i-^__O_ w <lY ~n~V OW SOS -~ ^L60V n n.N'f°~y a.. Lz..i wzaw •-~z..o zm,.aWa<{ano o~-J a<zz ~ ~ w•-.i iawpms{pzwpmpW p up.......+s uppuuWJ o FVNWJZf VaL uT L ZUmN ;ZZ2J Vi ¢2V ~ mLLm _ Lm Wpp p•ONI N{~i ~LttttJW J:owJ ~ W ~a mYmWOO=wV0000 NNw Vw n tt ~wNp J Wn2WY tt 6 w uYwJJ<¢U7 L ~ i O{^Y • UWOJJwJU><YY>LJ<nO Jr~~+nn.~./LLIZQ22 6Wr< AFJWaOa11(<Ow~O~JttW6Z T:n 2'Y JJJJJJJ<n~-VV> % <OY< JpJO«f1<+LnFn O- Jl< F < aamllm m60mLKmmLmVVIV~a®mpiVVUUU'J UUZJOVYL n' NPmmY.~WYU mPy uPVmrVnNVmmnPmm~VNOmaV a ?D WPyu~~4a+Un nhC Own J. 1 ur .a.=4m^bm+nmN^PiVWn~Jnn.r ^ 'T'-NNmvO.. J • 2 • P amoo m.a oadom+Nrvmmom>omwmoaJmmnmo..o °r cm.aNw mJ OdNOO+m+rvnoNOOnaryo+owaamomw LI raaV'a rvrvVP^m rdWamr m.a•NnOrvamrv^nN+VrVnn N'o'd +m Nparymmm.• NNPmm mOmVmmdmndmndmOrVn m .r a ^ n i•1 n P J ^ 31 ,. r n t~ + JOnNm+ddrmpOrrym+N armPOnN'•1lNarmpOnnm+4ldrmP 61 m++ mddddddaadOMrrrrwrhrw ¢1 nNNNNNNNNHnrynNNNNNNNNnrvnnnnNnNNNNryryryNNN RmmmOmmVOf OmmmmYOmmmVOmmmmmmmVVOmmmV000 t~ n^nnr.•nn^nnn.n.nnr.+nrr^-•rrwrw n•n .n .n n.nn^.~^.+^r~y LL J Z ¢ I w0 P P rrr .+ ~V NS 1 r z Jr an N•. ¢6 O N6¢¢¢ ¢+ ¢ m3 M6U Y¢ 1 6 P rm W_W_w_W w_ O 4N¢f I V•-r •+!rv Jwr ~V VS + rJY .70 N < mJZJ000 O !O nO, uV N.2 •J V 2 NN <6 VJ I yJ„W 1••i VUVVV JW u UujlVi •~ ~zJ as d +m m¢-• .J+a`i ~+ mi• mioLL IJ 1^ OQ I¢,I 1¢m C 2 •nON~ ^<J wNl U ^i i'f .u YNnOP ryryN w .Ir :N m.~O NM1OPnGRr 'J U. C m O O 6W ppee dN.t~PN~~ < ~^LU w7 __ ¢0161 NZs ¢Z w0 ON6M1L ~O<.J OSOJtONO O¢6d~ yQW JI t.<i w{<N NO< y. Vhi ~V<J2<ZP¢ <CL^ULLLLVUWUNON M.LOwSV iI¢• '7+y JS wJW G020Li0^O~O w dVJ2mLVLJ OV~md6 O r 'J OOh¢ UZOr¢~¢wYr<Ol<¢2Z07¢^OZSJZ0OSw202<Z2000wr NLLS Z6m w 2Vw3LWwOW~2 W_.n w_Zwm W•<h22~-• n uL Juwi r-V.]A J' J¢^< J YOWLZN L.nLL JL^L Jr~LL O3~ I J}.i inJZr > YYLLOmVJY}ZY YSr u6L I Ll.~jlnVw~ZrvU¢ON ri3 i~~~i~LL.<1J61¢LLy6EY6 N6mLKK2V L ^ T 6 ^ f 2 o rp VS I JU S J4 1U Z+ LL Z J -rVmiJrV ~ ^_ On I rIYJ ¢ ]3 - ttw ¢Y S '~ lw ~u ~n ~1.-w1.V i JV Z J LLY i ¢ Zw SwSwr w.ni V6J V_Ur U_ p Iwa I -•JM1¢J2621wU WY) Mu OZiS Irw uYu x3.n Uw.+J 6V•~r wLOU O >OJHr<wL uw J aJ O¢..Swr so,ez oowN^ ~w.w--..swo<zzzW~rarrN~ o a -iaw .. m ]r .• w z ¢¢NO<¢¢ or]uNd - ~ JzLW~Ns¢ww •^t wnczz~JrWJ<~noJawdy<r o Y JJ JJ wOOOa J << wl- Swu l)V<Ju VW i `: ZNw W.nO 6J ~t~wWwJw< Zw. ¢< ~ y<¢ rJt YYYrwrO r 2 Cw nU<LJ¢Zr2wm •C<w rc2¢VV WIn2 ¢6r-JR>2Y:'Z V•lpiUYSwN37¢<ZwL006=J aJ~V0000pOrUUwO~OVU•w wwp~Iw RLLUJ OU6hw~UVUSVN< - rJ+NP+J+.nmPOnrPmmNlnmm a.OmNNU•r+rrPlOdd h I o.~TwdmN^r+ pn-.-rnrv nOn.. p•rJO^ddOmminNU! n O'^ DJmNJm .D^~r NON +mYON^^.O '-rP Lm ^.•nJ YJ ^ ~. .i Pam°oon JOO mnnnN°irv ~,PnaPm~ mm~amNmPO^atimm rr r Y~~rvr.irv~.o~.rnn..: inraNOrva rv~immrvaNnr~vol.:oN rrvrrv ^ ^ mmmamMmmPm^mm0.+ Pmrprmmrm r r • ~+ NY ~+ .. O n ¢1 < m 6 ~1 !1 < 1 Z ~!~ JrrymlmaPmPO^rymrga^oS0^Nma'N angPO..nmrgq>mP0 O ¢1 grygmgOqmmmPPNPryPpPPPOVVpO..10000^~+^rr.n .fir r..rv ¢I Nrv NtVNmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm _; ^^mm04~^mm ~q^~~mgm^mm^m^O ^q ^q q~~^Oq Nggmgq j .. .. n r u i p z Y mV w Vw N O U nP O O 2 1 .+ r O • ~ < V ~. V ¢ 1 +! ¢ ¢ O P rL i< 2~`I ¢ +O = F M1S~ rr ~ y m + - Wrw ¢6 ¢ rV ¢vVVW6U 1J+ OJ~f 2 • .GWJ rNU.+n+ mrNO! U r~0~ mmq<nr¢q timrq~r aJr¢N.+^nNi !m ~ r¢~ ~ +l+2nW< ON^m.nN IO O!I_ m~gaN NI~NI~tir'.J S.I+S.In nl WNU~ae r/tJl rypU OdM1rm nOr w Onjr ~ JZmW~mNgOYN IIN OY.N NNi. r 6 s¢ I rn N~ I N I yy~ m+ 1 1 1 6> Wy I w Z 1 JI YOJ`OOjiryry~Ot <NryM1VI~, <200npryN000NtOL¢N<ry<O'I NVU U +O pZ~- i N'J¢ Sn ~2w OWV~02W ui ~~woo~Wwcwio ci-roocY o¢zWOnucoYWa o¢..oooca u ¢ pm .no _ ~i W. m m p?.iwiiY==i YyuYYi¢uY>~1ZNO ULYWY YOMY2YU.w i 1CUJU6S21'<IS LtYYyd <O~.>-= u6 u6 mCVO~n ~-p 6666 J Ja ZO O U J V+ r +m 6 Z L O J L i JLO N NNU L .F O~ +IV ./U2 J .Y O /1 O 'O ~T .x r- S ~ >OLLU¢J LZYE i¢ "JJ Yiw Lei u<wL¢WJm< Vr ZY<Z L rr J^ Sw VwW ..L Na<rf¢Z~O< dUZ.+N+ONSLY< rriL ~n Ui r.lu OwV O< L SrWW¢¢¢ y 6 >26mq YL6W<Y<w :] J2 SSS<2 YZZww ~ rV~ %2<Y<Wi+ C OJ<JwJw i V Z< SZYO YZFrOnwYYY r.n JO¢ i J i UOt< NZO LL~IwJ <ZSJ <m lm ~ZY-r'V Z 2 ZWw<YprY LwJ<O <ZF~OZ ONNWO Zm~ « > r<S ¢w6rJiw<wrrwL ¢ 6J¢ZW« NYOwJJJw2R J mV LZ ¢J'p~l+r+w JZJ1Jxw• ~ LCZNw tL 9 VO^Ym t^¢J¢USJJwNLjJY LVL000¢1CUY VYJC • zwxoz<W<..<>o¢o zzwo<<YFwW< a m.-z~.. qo O¢LOZVONwpLZULLN S..LN¢rr 1¢Y YYOJ¢YJVS<m¢ JOnaY..rawParrmUrNNrOlFrryaNlnlamaPhmYmN amY P JJ nNL ! m r JPmrNNUmIT a-'JUM ~ i .Si .Pi .. .. ~~ nn^~~rnWwP N'~M .. .. mmnrrn ^rms P..r ~rW~m 1 NOrNO a00JONJ•~iN Nry000JONVNnOPNOt]nNOJONNmONn a +OOPaONV mI"rynO.iNJONnPnOP^••JNNmPrNUrvNNN mOV.+ry'ramm.~mmmmmNp^mmNnmJNNUmmnryWmPrPNn ~• PN nrv0 21 < N .n ti .~ .• r 6 = 1' J z rmm Po••nmrpmnmmiii+:+r+++ammrurl In '°oNNln ao i a m`~m nmmnmmmmmmnnmmmmmmnmmmmmmmmmmmmmmnnmmm ii mmmmmm\momm^^~mmo~m^mmommmmomm^m ~~^~y ~~^^ U _ O _ _ __ J i a +N mN .`a P l 1 nm NY O+ ¢ ¢ui+ O U' rO¢O NKQ 6Yr+•f WON w a W wW • Zi+ ~r OS O H rN O im ipv 2•n ZZ ZV~^\ O.uY O ^J ~ ¢ N ~N Y J r NOO Op~ylj WUV t iW ¢ uV1 _W WWI WW W<C 22 • ••0(Or a>n ~nY•)POR P dmu.) yl • .)YQrVZi InWnN+ rn-m0 wN fLL SO yiN.++ J o :.i° rys 1 ..orvn N.1." ~•.z z.. Jun:. .m:rvN ~I~--..... ~z1-a~ i FmNmor lW\^ rJm¢ u ONPmU'a NPP ON m .pF id N2.•Iw00 IJI ~>IIN NN Im¢NN~ ¢U4V UOl ¢N O<r0<d OWOO <I<~>p J<O N<.Vii •I'JN ONJNryJNON¢ryJZNJYW ryNw6NtV~ <JN U~_ U VNU\W Vr6YU I+V N d•~ LLZU <NP]uUiu 02 .YLL•UiwN O~ <O• ^ NONOO OOOJ _O OLLW0o ~2WJOOJmwO OOLLO 4V zZ' aS^J^NrvF V~~ 03)• Y6r Nr-r¢aNrOV00 OdOZ<~ ZVZ<ZN2200<1620JZ0'J W<~+2Z<O 2u pi 2_UZwiWN~nWW mWW 2Zmm•+w 2mL Sr^6twW2 Zy1 6iw LL JiJ J~+•~iJirLWiCLLLL^'~<YUI+TU yI¢¢cZr6tixF.J JL ~<¢J>Y YuYO Y au6 dYYWrxY2~•^LLY LLtJ<.~«Y<O<¢« OOW w¢r y ~LG ¢dU6¢OU bNdb6d~SNN¢JY¢126N~d1LN6t6SVrim ~LL z ¢ •so u .... W Z x bZ<N Z Wd< S OZ^ O x •+Z'n > KJKW 7 O •• Y 2 S O Z r ¢JwS S O N VSUL : Vijv rS W¢Zwii .SwN~Y •.J rLnl ¢6 ..Z^J 3 •LLi0^ ~[WV Y.Zn<W Z LJN dW .+Zi<W< WJ ¢Z ¢wOJj 7^d Jm dY~w v z";iJ`~:W 3'"i`)zJV.~~WWCJ~ ~~3i>°l ~,¢.~2 Y'"u ~.d~,a~ WoJZC< 02Y0LL30¢U JJ ZO¢W<SWh i Z¢¢•'~ Y< ¢tN Y2y?V O'-I¢OY2Z<~+Jrr<NFY}O>Wr¢O W2n^N y.LN M1 Y «f<JfW ZSy2w¢«r~O <006 r <tNm<WVU¢O ~zNixcc¢LY~uW ddu nd Lw~foxdicc ~sJZZZ.~zzzm~ m..m nooomsmi~a-P~mmo.rv+moi^°nnrJm nrcaNnn°n ti.N•nm'.N.vrv O ~+m..^l^mSmmmpWmPPmmNAP^mJ ammmm PNm PN•T^mm 5 mmeaodoo ui-a~rmrveJ ooNNNOmPaommmomooonom+ .n-w. .nPpNOwoooor nPP owNwonnaorvNnJmooomona +] :~ Pa~Y~ryaNO+dnNPanO mNmmwmm4lwml~p+ONryrvry+OnWdOrv! i w amanm~ry~PNrmry^m>, oti^wrvnmmmmvroaanPmm ryrv rv o oNm P ¢i n a: -. 0 0 a m ! N tl P P 2 NaYmPprN mrm al~mPJ^NmflP anmPJ^NmfmdF iPOnN ° a~ m~caaaaoan n~-nnnr-I-nYmnmmm mm ~°~mmmm~nnm~P. ~°nn Pm ~°.~°r i1O ` mNm ~n ~.m°~tin^oN»°e oo^^tio^~m ~~mNm~mm~mmm^^~m»-'m V Z 1 ~+ J U 1 .. o u z .. ,° NWWWW r o ~ WN W nr s ~ w ~ °° ir...r. `. `. r a {.W. s a". z'Y .. ^ i^.~ ~ 1 z H~ Ifj¢W¢¢y¢ ~ yW1alUW= w_Y ¢ wtN _w ~U'U Jr s'•~L N Vf yJU U 1 NOS O aWVw wooop n~ a^;JWr oW rvo iwoi°[No I V¢N¢ Y U N• Qr- ¢ 00~- J WWU41C JN nUWwi W JW NW02JW ~ClPmlw^ NJt¢ ° wKNV~- O.]`/Nm OV mrP¢ I yNwwJ Or< J mONM( W- ON WNy N r N~a Z~1 rylw OJ2' ^wN~O<arN~ N111 j~, 6Z^6 nm~1^9N2 •Sr~W ~YN~!OrVnRw tV~f 6N rtiYO t~ 10N JW- 6rl ~m ^LLONN~VON I_II rJNlr Lynn IN r wow .~.~p~_~~... ~. >i nrvn-<i~ uiuioWnnN"~Nr¢LLy~M1wW~ryrynN o.z., "'V°'> nV V WJ~ -N Wi U •NV W VN>IVN ULLUUI u VyrNLrN '~NjVrU uV LLuJ N< LLLrYi ZpOO~uOUwLL<rf[h6WOOJ 1¢u0.2. LL~p00 WwCIrOV V_ 00 OJOS wJ .aWNN O VO U R ~ VFZZ •O ZO<ON -J <LZ2NOOw¢~OSN~02Z2 W4~¢6WnwZf - Nizri§s~r~i aiaoose°N~.L.i°~i C:J»~ii~~<w°W.~~~.2.'4i u¢i ^UU>LLYLLV ¢Ja<0>~mfWNZOLLY.J<LLJ•» aJ>J >Z < r00<lV~w»Z <¢¢W«a aw Z~w ~nn.i`ssa~aa~W~NOmacrvr¢mNa ~~aaw¢auLLico~-~Nw u I zi po u ¢¢ 2 oW .. z <a o> '9 t L > u xs i s u° ¢ ¢¢ L~ S~J z¢ui ~a op z:ds e~r++ ~' pWWZW io~,n..ooi 6.~ ~ MV~~.u.Np JiW~N~i°. J i~`.~ °o°wriz~a °si.¢.ia~o- i¢l~a'offiW °~pp°~°i~sz UNN26^Y~Nw00 OOLUV 2< 6N<¢ OOVLNLL<UUV Ut ~ ~JOVwiLL S<ZNw6LLFxV'J¢VVLLa<NJwuiO¢¢~Q-NZ ZVONL ~ JVw4Wp wL< OOJ¢Y<r0 Ov¢~¢w LO pOOrY w2 NZ J_00_p< ¢r ¢UNrRO <¢WWWr><V NJOtiU rui¢6r SOOVZ< ¢¢OW^VmmmmOrj -~ ¢(a>rWWZrwp¢I00 IIVV2r O_ONW<1•R _ '~ L 9GZaV a~<OYrR¢OWLia wa00 C~~>iO~~~OW ~i<OJV aOUVM1VIC¢i6uuGV¢O~¢O(V¢6¢Jm6¢6Y<060~NNNUZN n Pa nPwdUmJwmndOamNrPdNaOSNnw rvLPO 61 nrvPONmnwmOaPNf n+ mmmwPp 1" amuirrYnn m+n oN TVNyrOP PmWN prvmmPJPryPOmmrNPY P~ • J mommmmaom..mNmmmmoonaommm°JO°rJaomm~mmry„r norvrvnrPOm.. orrvnrvrvoommorvryryoJm°rJNm ~- ci mro+<oonrvnnoos m+~n r:n NU~...o oNr~-.i v~u~nrvnNm <1 Tmrmm .n mOVrONmmml•IPOrvmmmmmrrrvrr mm~rrvmmmry» V rv 1 r Y m [1 V S i•Ir angPOrNmrNaYgPOrNmrNanmPO•,nmYNangPOrnm ~ ~~ OOOY~r~lrr nrrrY~l~lYr~rrtYYlliY{YIYYrr!!+ . si mm~^m^m^mommoo ~.°. ~.°. m.°. .°.^om^ooommommm~o~MyNm ~ r r J O V P W u Y qN rr r rr YP m ¢ P ¢K 6 ¢K'r! L Z¢ ~o SS L LZ~ •Lw iS ~ ! OJ •r'~rv GOO.VUnnrvwVY>nnlw0 Y° ONNn ¢ •`1¢1-r ~¢WrwrOY ¢ Wy OJ yJJJ WW1 ¢ ¢JMJWW J UW O~S`a OrmOn.r ~mJrrm-W>-YmmU NOP6m ryr~mc zrrn N°mrmJWrvary<o -~ I.:o ~:1 a zr,: r.l+.W,1 ° 1°. r:..l.°.r. j~r$:.ao :. •~.! \ ~orl_ a1 rurl. l-l-m nQ s~-l-NSn>ol-m•~~~N mno auNr. 1N Nz<.. +. ~nmN r611 13 r 1`INN2JNm~L\6Y111`IN< JOr<JrWOyrOOV00 °niirvl°v n.N <rynNNr ¢nS r NNNN OHO mLL ~ m V VUO ¢2Jw r w OWU u u JYOw u u wuOLLrOaiLLUw<O O ~OOrJZ v10¢ OOOOmVN pLL000uuuwOn°2\VO00°JL 1 VO wu _ O OGOLL q ~NwJ V\ it r-aVr >iV}rm0l-r1.~YN rr 1-Y J n ny LzOZtm 2i 2222NUrY0222000U2{Z JU Ox2xmJ wjW w_N~-r yTwwJW_WW__WW ZW _ _ 2Liw JnV•'•W w_wZJ Y r Sr.< Y U2=L~ ' uJJ rtN>rJx Yu1 a rPU2}6V} y}?< Y uuJYJ>"25N0}Y 6 }OOOrOfw « « « iwwWn<u<Ow<•'•« t dAU1i N~+a6x6 ry1111NM1aLL~S11¢2'J[u1<6VNm J111L Rw 2 p 1 VUV .~• < W ~ x2 V r 000 ¢ i ~ OWQ Z6 r- NC Z J W LO W «f fV ZZxN u W J. W ON6 N L L UOVx Y O _ ¢6u F .c YLL -w'~<O SW> O J< ^ LOS aW J W 2 ~ >wSgZJJ < w w}O NN 6a 22N¢m°J7 N L:f1wM«t1uLR 1-.W r ¢ffN Lw7 wf2¢w m.f LwO z<ww-...uuup6imyNZ}o¢ mWmccaxL>r r °W ..u„ p <NWx~c pp aom- ZoZ~Jmm2.°W J zmJ~r x NN N¢¢¢LN~6r2NNN~xy tr~~OYpO l« •Y 2W rV S fOWWww2 N^J 06w V]2 •<]622 W JSSS$f rON JZ}w NN6Y0¢2WJwr N W¢ ., i~~: ~<...-Yr ui<ra¢uJ wr.. <..u<L <wzJS»oz~~o ¢`J OSrS7JOJ~ Z¢N2VJW~ ¢>VmYZQ2NYL¢6%mO 00°OO=NOaOWJ7i00<fOQOmOrrf C~< m LNwJ3~NNNN2 2NSNNY I¢LOw¢IOY S>11V32GJ1~i u<~ hml"P amP i-gPNgPmnrNnOm rl•rJFUlnmJmrOTaV SY.]ryirNrmNn~ONmmlpYmamaJ frrm OrN O ^m N~OgPmmnmm rr'1q V^gPmnWPmvmPNPy^a„mrOn^^mPr •i °m~m°a°nnm°o°o n ~ rvovu~n .ao~m~n ••P pnmry~n Yeti P n p ¢I Y ~ n ..• -~ T; ry W U LL p V U x z 6 tl I rl ilii~~i~iii O~~mNy mitt •ml0m L L V u m L a •+ v ¢ 6 P Z¢ { ~M1 2 Zf ~p pryj¢ ~- l0 ¢r N 2w WI WV wP f_C ¢J ~ NV~ wl TmVJim ~+ O ¢VM12NS I,pry y Yn S'Nnn YL~ ~~ '~V~Un rv2~~uoJLpY~ YU ~~ZrpOGwSNp fV~722wrw Z 6sriLLUN«~LL s.~n:ia sa o'aLLa ¢ i ¢ sp OT ¢ 2 >1 A 2 V iu ~ z V O u¢ CVO upn G' ~iL ~• ¢tii ti S ~ ¢ f wGi {~~r .J.lt¢ ~GOry ofSnp w~OVJG > 3600_ N YZ¢ r0~ in Y¢O ¢f N <j6oLL2uw 231i plpV~{S •lPnrivNM1Y.~Pry 1~wJU T.y P .SON u V F o o°rvaoaNOO ro a~epoPOOOrN~r ~' JONrmNmoJ joOVanOPmOOmO "~ tl Y Y d hNJr.yOm00 dPaadmOaONda r1~^ 1 `~ I mdm.n Nr ~d NOV~r^TNnP P ~ m ^ C <1 Nd ^ N m-~~+rl r mm aJ.".NnanmPO+mar~pPO.~iM1TrNan aPOrNmrmanmF o `¢~ Naarrnnoon rnnmamNNmmaaaaaaadaanrnrrnn ~ i~ ~n>rvrvrv N,w mmmmmnrr++rrr+rrr+rrrr++..+rrr+++ z1 ^^r..a..°.m.a..mmtiy^mmmmmmmmm~oyy^y^yNNmmmmmmmm» p~ r j ~~ in wd rsn ; m W WLL NSF rwn i i ~n~ m'r'a rm m N YL ; ¢mr¢~ Rr V w .ri »in r~~ ^ mNn w m ¢ ¢ ¢¢¢w >P Z L ± ¢w= ~ WPJS Fo • ' J W " ~ rJ<O ~JV W r W¢ ^'~'~ '^ Y mRrU JW OL rw J J N 1m 1~ j J Wn?. J; ~ ¢ 00 om .. Na v m .N i~Wi am~`LL z ~ .r. ~'°v z ~i Oi^Q` OY Y< OOp ^~ J V V o N WNUU6 tS Ym 6 O dNOmuu¢J < wl 1 P N W f N v w>„NN06TY f NWS.L]6¢nOwV OI O t] .] u LZVJ<_{_ SN W_ O^ 2oY w~ w w n r Y r .~ ¢ r N OOrrJJQ wi W 2 < L N iS~JJ¢rji00 ZJO< VG¢2f {nwt. i o L z W p ° ....~~~'-Ywr~ "'O aNa iii°.m-usu. ,s "~ u Y j > op LN zz¢W -~~. ¢v wr~¢uuwuuwwoo auNNUNJn ~ _ ~ u o .z.. z ~ { a <m o~.zs i ~ W~ i ~ ,u., .¢. .>. o iaLis iW ~ou~u i~i~ ° ~~mz opoN = 2 S W eLi i < mN6«w2 GN ~ ¢mYw OJt <_fV 0 1 O w O C %O ° J ~LtiSwSr<~ O¢ OW¢Z~u°iWw LO ' ¢ Y J ¢ y ~¢n<rWOwW ¢¢1p~^ijVwSJJJ6 -~ J > L V WONT rr OOLWWWW~ u~{ LL w W L ¢WL~<rr UWN¢WrW¢Nt¢NNV~ ¢ V l m 6( L <UVL6N<l«rw ;wOLLNN ~> {l{ « {r{f\Ymmmm ^ a r N .N rvnO~NdPP NOmVrprvOa+Nmmmh j d~ + N a P N ~TaM1Nr NrTPNhr.~NP P~'1 Nf~1N ~ n n m ~ .r r11 naPP .+ nndP^~I ^J P 1 _ oPO°mao°o~°noo°p°o~On amo°im°o n~riom°a°.i°o°aa~°n°m °o ,i o°ao~na N .. onon~iop ~.e ~.: nmu, l-o.-,.:ou°p °m .N. ..i 1-m~~-~.>ry aro o~nm -. ^ mJ wn.• nr p Nm ^ T r ¢1 < w n n nw wYm a -. Yi < I I u-.rvn~.Nal-mPO..n Nrm Pa.-mPO-•nm Y.n al-mPO.. n.nYN.u i-~Pr ~' mmrYm:m:..'YYSY`gM`POpJONJOp~Jw~w~~~~«N~1m J 21 mm.minmi^m~imnJmim^~mOmbmO^pmmmmm.Nmin~lnm~w.mnw0 U r r w r 1 _ _ _ N 1 uzj ww UuiiNm ¢ uii W ww a.nyr wOW _ wW 0 0.- onn~ Mai i :as.«.i~N.«.~«..~ ar".«.ar « a i r« as o n omm Pm «r Niir r 1 YYW n¢ryOR<PmKLL ~¢yU aJZ¢mN m¢¢ LLYi1 K16 I in2 LLr~Z •O w2• Z pw rH n=i LL• _ W 1 Vir ~^IIWMJ2iMW G•Z«i• Pao RUUw VF O YO ~w Om OZ ~ <J ¢Y_w¢ JWO YUW _NWyaWWRUWJ WY pNLLW^~ WWW N ¢~ W¢W NJ JS'U ~OJ ~ 2 ¢OJI U •~wni ~'L ~+Y `NZ rOI00 2\Nj wt nn• Sti w 6Ur.uwNJ L¢IOU wwLL ey•JJ .nu wYi W1w 1 2.cw mW~LLWm ~Z Z mma 2 N O ' a^y~p ^prwi s~r¢~..WV> p WONNNONN _ Wp^U rzOww ^mmO«O mOOU¢w f<J7«> HII U ow rp Z« OW ¢M >s VLLUJ 1 NZV4W«n r~-O< ON~rrTrr w 6JUU UN Ur ~•+ ¢OWNJ~-Lfj <wn 2NW2Z6yN W 60¢« Z OwLp Z: ¢ ONw= O N JVV.. V OLJLLO<« ii 66 ¢OwLS¢i r66 ZDOLLjrp~ OWOiJ¢ VVUH~ yjLLY(JppJO<O;«<¢O<`66000<ppZw ?uLamN<SJIL.z•~RL~uUiZ~wjwa206~mrZWw ~WJOjH V/~JJ yma~W<ap¢ ¢Wrrmnlzs>wNmwWOWN:JHZWwWW<Wr I ;~izc>~~L°~adi~o 3~i~ii~WOO~co op>NN~ii i°~n a~°n ~¢..~° 1 < zp ~v z ~ ~ i •'V n¢ ir. a ~- a •¢ f Jw -f.i nu ~ JW ,,¢ i w¢«. 22 VONZ y •+O O 00 N p SVOf • < O '1 V V tJ U s_ Y 2 a .O•W y.2. OL< W~ „ Vwry.-• O w in SY JS IHUw ^6Mm J O 3 Si yV ¢w ON:OJ LLOOSNU a t <¢ a' .~ w.NVN ¢r W VNONV6 2NYyZSWW auuo u r<N«r« mo ¢J¢S ZwW ONrO{OUSwp w¢O r ••OOOfNW¢WVrJ~fOLJfOW O<Jf uIm• OO~LI{^Yr¢J 10 rLiOwO OOpHNiiyOLlw IV J J 6'F >¢{iYrN<r < YMNFO "IZ J ~`.` OrInN UIr~JJ•+zrF~-<V C6WHVNU^LWnjUwlnLZi~ V •-J000 « LWH«rJ000667J Iw{Hr6Yr04<V m YL<mmmmUUUVVwUVVVVVUUUVVV01{FOVOOFVUFWYw N.fm yFnmYrmmTYYr!-aryNmN~mPY rOPNOrYNNmP GI PPmr pl•Iry am.p al"nn~mFinaNmNPPwO0ara00.nOry)N .-. I .. .•nNVPP PPw PI~a P mOmPry rPi~«wrn aPlOVn~ryNnY • 1~ nomn~monpomPO m..mo oooNOmiopmmoorooo.pa o UOJOPnNUmOOnrOhpNinJOVnnOyJmJrmOamaYVnVPUN Jrv rNPONmhNN rvu\aNOaNam NnOOpNNn NmnOpNOWaNW -fir aPmam .~ in hmN mpNmm~nrmP O.+r.-r aln PN ^IN r m -~N .n m Nry r ~nm uh W n m N n~ d it V •-Nmrm a~mTO.+rvlnr9 al-mP0•+Nm r.n ah mPO•~NmvmahOPVr O YI NNnNN NNNnmmmmmmmmmmrrr•ff AOmNNmOaa < KI NN aNmammNNPNNWmm NU.NNNNNU\u. N _; ~^^0^Nmm~OmOmmmmm^m^^AOM~00mm000mm0ymOmmmy J I ^ n n m U O Om N 0 L CL SJ Z 1 mPn•r a.-~ w0 u a.ai amn Z ~+ r n _W j.Ym WO ~+ Y m ¢ y' •1P Sh 6 YYY±n~~ 6 ~6¢ ¢V • ~ W < VUUNrVU ° NZY00 Om I U NJ Y F62J16¢i .pp¢ < m NY VU JW 0 WW ~NtiWY Wm i- ¢ -.W~uN ° z 'a o¢ o.i •muooor ioi 1 SV - ~+ O< M.VtirpN Nl-• 2~~ w<N w n ~ ii<AWL4 ion Z J NN~' V ~p in=01,i{WWZNNNLNN LL_IZ-OOpVm UU< Z> S p{LL LLOM¢N<W« <YUjjYW 222LLwu0 >W ~H WZ~J N ySSm JJJL UNLOw >u S6> 61 ^1 ¢JO ].'n1J ¢Nw LUUV 'JVUN WuZ-WW OI-wnw OL ¢IN °<¢uMtm ¢2 tiprw J¢O ZtiWNN SO o. oziu~n •' +oouW um¢ew w¢ < c<<a i{°{J1~'~.°a'~~~ o xoo pl-iop - Ja ¢'zpW¢~ r~ S~6J2~-ZOZO<29Wm« yOy SOip7000~0 <f ~~{6K<NO_mOV2¢ 2V¢~¢=]Jjm in-2 ]w~JJJr•J7 J~p r m~26 JJyJIp- wPN~ ^Z>LwwuNULLWO~~i[NUw iwV¢SUJ a02inw o<i6<OOWwW2wWwNJ~{Z<OOW>•~^pW•~ I rJ.n.y.n NU LLw'SC Nt1 J6JJJpx¢r6S¢<WU6.r W U.<~-OmZVSih~ LL J S 2 2 U r ~ 2w~ ~ Z R i u ai - x a nL uo z o ~ ~o¢ i u _ u i .uu ¢ .ni _•W .gym z¢ np J9wW ZJIh 1 :J ^^ J 6W ~~SS .]YSJ¢ aa>< StuuYL+Rx - pplY r>'I YO t tiw Y O¢W~N 62y~JOJ~r~Yw< tiU2L r 2%n~fmr~<•w0¢u< V-~- y~ L 6 ZI1nJiP ~~•.'IY °¢N O -mow 6v62ZV1-mWOw2 °pNJ¢ J O 1-NOOV2~n S~pYN JZ N •+<pp(( ~ V.-w • V«{UJpZ>Y RUNw{wnNO -00 JJ SVa~ ~ _L¢O _ZS 2 lpS w1>2 6i.n Ji-V uZ1 <V~Z Z W OS <OZ 2¢l <~+6 6f.+u w'Z w2~OZWWYVO<¢a~ J=ilrZ~, <OOmLL 6IJWJZ'J J¢ ~ JnW<i¢{W26Z2~>6wJ.-O{1J2OJL0J0¢n0¢J J!•JYp p00¢j.Y{pWOO IUfY<rOn<SO 2 OOWWw~¢ f mLLJ. '. u VIOJVV DOwSm62N~Sm VU 1Jf[YYSuYJJ ^ Y ramhYn nN0 aa0h<OPh ON.^PNnNrh9^OmON4\nm M1~ nmN~•pm mOONPI-Y.pr OOh ) amOm.nNnP w i ~n m .ten nryn arPw^OryOP.m rymnn.~PNP ary ~,„^hPTry Y•^n ~~ i~ gym..°on.°>.i°o vnn~oo°J~°n.lic°m±am°r°m °Oa mu°I Prnm°oo°°°~a.~~mo~n~m°o r i~l mwi~.'°.mtiimnl°ummN.mrv.F.~rnm°"~rvm,avo l: .F.a-~.m°~°~moromnO NP°o N m n ~- n.. -. NN N I•. v r .. .~ ~. i .. b i ~ .. .. i i Nnr ai-mPO..rvnrN al-mPO.. N,.~r marmPJ.NNr cl-mP O.+n si aaaiaazal-~~-„~.~~-r~-raammmmmmmmPPPPPVPPaPOUo sl :A N'a\NNmNam NNNNNNaNNNNNNaNNamWNmNaNN a mmmmmym^~:~ti,mmym^m~mmmm„^mmmtiy^y~mmmmm~$m J .~ J V ¢ p S 1 NwN yO[ W i W IN•1 • w J~ V ~-J a< m' NSA ws¢i N ^P as .... .~.cr .. m.~. ~.~.Ir.F.n a i r a u O 'u N. <.r. •.zi s -. p ~n >asn 4M `a u ¢NW z ~ oz n,. j iNNw mNU<iM1l nn z<a a ¢ wo J NO'`AO NNS ONppJ<.i.Z WNWWp % N s„ ZNI..N ZN Z<„'~yl•nRVN Viw UO:r-~R RW.,,W Y j Q.+u~ZN u JuVU¢i Oli~2>FOO <~ I•<JZtFO 0~F uauuy z uiWW~•r <aouWSU..zws Wi~a WCZ~+>¢~N.. r w <¢ O K ~2V<Z ¢K ZwVZOW Zni NZOZ<N L o.ioJai4 z ,. zzWU<~.uwNaw~-WN O~¢W~FF O..W WUo w JoNWa z .> oN z> oazbNb z W rpNOf o,sJ ¢YO 3~6J ~ l¢i6,n¢U I > iw i .., m N i 0o u¢u si Z4 <JZ V 0.Z •L> V J x-00 i i.. u°. bos a z wN~ s°u < x< < __ 2a W_1 f`< '+JJ Z N2 ON.. Z<Ow • J Y ZZW uu0 S V N~O Zr0.iw ¢w¢u 41> _ ¢wuzi ~ ,z, ~~°LSi~bb `olio Z ,n 4NY~W~«UZ'WOR 1 2U ZOOw 2nl r+ W Z WNO J JNwV7 FY O>"ZUF « < L¢SYw2G YJ iWO {¢ I uwWO'J J.Ni `~NW4 SVL~ YLO<J0. 06`<64wLN~<i0'J mU'> J.iV >FZZZ:w Nt~2ti02JJJVJV0. JwZ6NF2fNo J «.J.IQ<Iw-Vyy yLyNSt•u ~+rOOJ%200<rLL U.WF<WJURW W¢S m_SS J J•'~'•~Z.92t1 r2+¢KLr~i imH~Ni¢2YUVV'J PmV¢¢OOSJVI ..,moo-aN«««JOO «mWOZ..z« «..«¢s¢o «< u J J zzzz~IZwiFZZ:zzz<z obb bb<o.z ziuabbb¢¢¢¢s ` mcnl.~rmorva m I-tim.,ry^-O'^.~n mPPFNhm-aNN O..mm a.. n. .... ar. ~-~ry~.. rv oaoarv..-...-P gym., ~ Pm rv=ryONJ J`T ON^naN^ryF !^NnP nGTTP uNOVmO ~ •- ^• r r N N•"I N N l I u 1 2- Nmamon ~.-oPl-Nrim nnoP i~-ooincrooN~roPON J-.No PmrNOJUnmonPau-°Jrvno.-W POJJV noonJN .. of-rrmo N ii u~~n mnainmmvm mriomou.s o~n rim ry~n amsm> ~o Orrn^mNm~Nmmml~NYrym m mPmmmlmVOP a.-~n u ¢ ~ .... o ~., .. N .. 6 f r rv V 2 N rpPO-nmrNa~mPO-NmYN a.~mPV^NmrNaFmPO rln vw 0 ooooJ O.a^--..-...^--..rvnnNNnnNnNmmmmmmmnmm:rrr i s ma~aaa oaaaaaoaaaamJamaaaaaaJ aaaaaaaaa < mNe~~am m°m ~m~m^m mmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmamm J V _N ON J N1 __ i 4 ww JL m L ah i z .....- ¢ .... .. .. m or jr- ~ vi iaLL.+i ..... 2 ¢¢p R2m ¢pRNR n¢: NIpN i \upG j p¢ x¢zN .. zssJL aw ' N i~uu • ~¢WxR -~ ix WW.+ ~-' -iVy 2JhF2w UU LJ ~WOYO. Y u0 Huai < ooouJ _ owxo <2 ~¢ <.. WWW^r ¢" WLIW JW na m WUU ~Z-- Wm=O V Wll Ws o_. < ~. smom tio4:RmR?o r¢a °. r o NO m l ¢ryiNi N6'n~N~N.mi YpOP1 LL J •~J w W2r „O ii~ 9p}7VY mV J '4i Um > >wt N u y U< ~2-r m ~w N<ON~ <O tL7 PORN . .~n ..` ¢ ~~ ~ . J NL FN VIIw NRNN SLtiLL6ZU 2-+ 3~'-0 <cWio i -N m^u ~Z Om''Lw~ 'u<~r Jm YJJV¢~< 4M F~¢ UUr R RwVJNwrV OI..JV<VU20N>~ 2rwir 4¢a z zzJR Now aRP zs w W¢..p -zR-ti p~ wt O u TN wOwS ww~ >w<WZU¢uwmw WO}~ wMLN '>wtiJO~L O<w000N J..U NL<OmOO>wNNWZRi UZ SVJ U>wl-ZtV VIV N^ }~ ~.6 NmV NRWYN}> J~nr .[O~<Vw6m~J J OOw<20 -<UOLLOO RRO lOJ l>m~uSwNJ-r~<i<'J JJ~~J~3}O~LL7w~VWN b~¢-rR ao~LWWZwJ oNZ¢wuWwoLL¢wm w4wo.N:Lw¢z¢ J~O~O>~+PY-Zw4¢www¢OWW<>N Uw O r~W O><Ow I .n .nm VOLa~•1P~+6 N40Z¢4NtiSVOf~NZ~4NYNyLJO>Ln } •2 Op< L Vu4 N ZZ~ OOJ O S Z J Z OOt -V -4w i° Ww" iii a •a z-. }uoi O- f< ^^VR VNT. pV7 ¢L2 .J /i ~ ~m ZZZ 4VN ~+WY NZOw_V ~6¢ ZSR J }U ~> <UU ~i44L L -.. O Nww hJ - f :t - `-Vu x ,JO.. ~-,,. ~n JJwN < ws4.. w...-Naz i a~W~ I°n o¢ < <qm^~2VZ«4 ¢w0?7JUJ x.¢ r~JpaO Njo :¢ Z _SwVJV-N mLUr~.t w ~L ~/ Q~~LWww4N< LL O w < <5 4r ¢ N¢SNI.> S LOGOxNJ02LZ Jr-O<V •ZO JO{1(OJO~-OV RNR Z¢ROw6uy4ZU ~ 00- w 7 VV i~2 ZJ2 VVNN <R 2J< j1Y<}Z~ SJ¢O aw jrn0 J O KR} SWYLWy xVYpp O¢~+r'•w nn~NLLJOw OI~Ww¢w jt'O ~ N VS-OZ--rS6iH2uOL>VRO<wL VJ-NnJwr~YOJ ¢ ^>~>-IK wW2400Pd4rrf xm~Tt22<SL2tO ZZ<1 `2 N<pO Oww u K36¢Y~INNYNNNNNNNNVnNNY<m 1Y w-Li~>>jSfLjlM} ~oPmor ml`I-PNrvmnomor ..aamrYN-mrmo.~^min ..a PPn n~ i~-Ja^mN mmNanmm wnrNmNr ~. .. PoP o ...NNO momm- aol=omYPO~J+oPNmmPNOOJNNI- .. rv^.. .. ^rv n .. N n rv- .• n-N .13 u _,o 0 4J0 S~ 61 ti K1 KI o.`.a mm i i .... -. 1 V ~u i _ ~ nL V _• ~ ~- V O Vi V 1 np ~7 OUW S O~ LL~ O EOM nL9 J~ w0 Jp S LL t Y H~ ~S i ~N~ ifY a ti P u !y-ry. aN N U • t3~ COPYanw~w.a-R««.w..N.. wN«w.b.Aw..ru.w-.«w.r........n...n_I. AMSICATION FOB ILLCONOfIC tlV1~A01 tEDENS/Ifl I. ITPE(S) OF UCENSE(5) FILE NO. Daportmanf d Almhdk /ayNlll// Canted 1901 froedNVy ' RECEIPT x'10.370862 70 11N BSRNLRDINO Socrwnwlb, CaR1. 9381/ a r«caNl wnrlnc .eunelll ON-SALE BEER i RINL FLYING PLLCE GEOORAPNICAL CODE 3615 Tha wldwapnM hwcby applier ter Fk a M a r dIw/Ibad pl {OPpl.p Data NIY~ r ~ u S ~ 2. N^^..f) OF APFEICANTF!) Tamp. FNwB ApplNd Ilndx Sac. 7q/1 ;] ER«fva Datw ER.cNw Dole 3. TY-E(S) OF TRANSACTION(S) FH IK• lyF! f :. Nemo of f1lYrlw .react ol... !. loca/on of /wimrrNumbw and Shaw 9 Cite Illd Tip Coda CDUnIy TOTAI f {97.50 . If hmdwR Liemucd, To 1>• Surr. upon luu~nca of Nar {1 7. An hcmiwl MRid. Show Typ. of lionw ~ 19W na Cih limia7 yak /, Mvililq AddrRm (II dilhnnt tram S)~•Jumbw and Strcal rr.rrl lPrwl SaY Y~sC 9. Mwa yeu ewr bNn conrrtllld d e tNOnyi 10. Nava yea avw vidaNd ony d IM gvvidonR d Mc Alcoholic ~ /ercrvge Contrd AN w rapukNom of Me pparbwnt pw- raining la Mc AcN ~A I1. &plain a "YES" anlww ro ibml 9 w 10 en on aneehmDnr which Mell M daemcd par d tMl application. 12. Applicant ogrwl (o) That ony mamgar cmphh.d in on•w4 lipnwd pnmiwl will haw all Mc quoliicatiom of a liomca, and (6) Ihw M will net riolob w cauw w parmil b M HdoNd ony of M. proridonl of 1M Alcohdk Iwarage Conhol Act. I3. STATE OF CAIIFORNIA County 'of .Sia~wcdlrlo__________________Dob _10r8rf2______________.. uNw RmNn N r ..[A wrrm rMw lyrwnr. wwwR Mn.. mriM. wR x ;11 M rr M «N:rwa, w wn N rM .RNiwnrl. m ...rn N rM .nln.nrrr MrnN M ;M IrMry yN4Nwn. M. wMrnN nr. ryM rlrir .«14n:m m In MMII; I!I rM M Mr rW rM rl.rrr •wMwrw W rM.~~M~mnnn INr.N W Mx MeR W NI N ;M r a.nn rM.nM x.h • ill M.1 wMr rMn .M a.Nns r.Nlie.nrr Aw mr R:rnr w I.yrrr n rM MN'vw .M:r.^ Mxn • M rx4wnl rNwrrM liamxnl Iw NrnR rlrir .w1µ. m.N; Ix Mr M r nAn nRNrnem w wM.Mwl wlw i ;w rwN N NnN. rM w N • • INRn .n gnwlnnr w nrN •nb sr rAmM wl A.r xd:Mn;M MR drrA ;M r mrlw .wlNx 1 RIN .rd M 0..x M wxr Irn NN'nA . MdxrM. r r Ir • n.Nrr N 1 nrbrnnx ea..J w r rne'nr d Irmrlnn: HI IM iM vmdx .wlnrim rn.r M .NNn.n b rirM rM ..N4«I n d. rwoM.n~.e M uwltiq IieMln. u na.M. M D.R. !/. APP!!CANT SIGN HERE __~ ~-.__,.~___._ ..JE_A-_____. __________________________________________________________.r APPLICATION 1Y TRANSlEROA STATE Of CALIFORNIA County el______________________________________Dab UnNr wMlry N wr wIR M[wr .MM r•.rrMnl wwl r M.., xr1Rn nN r III Ml i n IMMN, x N4x sl rM r wrM IM Irrynq v wllx wdnnrvm, NIR MMrm. ~ x.b Mn nJw .wlrnnm m r MMII; i)I MxnM MnM rMbr oNU w lr.r NI rn x .n IM .nx ANnl:wnNl11 MMrrM/ MI.. nN N n«Nx r M r. rM wwin«I .N w Ix.Nm :N:NIN m rM .ryw Mrlm N rMn ne«I,re ern Ixn, dn~nA rwr0w i bN \I rM DMalwr i01 rM rM rrm[M .RNi[.rim x «W~nrlw M1 wr ;MN p um~ wr•Mnrn Ilan x rnJLNIRII .wr.mwr IMwN , l nw rMn nrMn Mr wnNlry rM N/ m .IrnR ;M r lnrlx 1'.r:m n RIN .nA M. r / n •rNxma r Irr w oN:w N rr •rlxw x N NIrxN w inMw mw roNrw N vmrlxx: i Mx rM xwdw lwl'nanm rMr M mrMn.n M aMx rnr «Nlunr r M Inmrn .:M M rrMr:rrl riM:Nry w Mr awwrnmr .. .. of .. ' r r I ~ I/. Olanw Nvmbed+l Qy~yF.(/HF V~LLAaE jnco B~~ ~y[1LCAt ~FN1kR ~ k~~ t~ ~` • Toi a zz 9G 53 Soil Pun Lour: Batiac.. Ui~eot 9G?3 gassl/ar- PRn,Etrv Pc~s~r+cvszeue: Nn~NdeRAMD ~HMaR~uL. I~N~n rk,yN~«+oov ca~w~~ -Sd,~: low IQra.uwr~•L. 2-y Dll,/AC Farr: I~.`.ICNBoRNWO C~„vNUUWt_ lcksr. ti5 COPY...N..~.x.w.N~, a.NN..n....__.~..I_ w----- AMNICATIpN N7A AlCOM011C RiVERAOR 11CUISEIS) I. TYPE(S) OF LICENSE(S) illf NO. Depahnenl d Akohdk Ie C maSe whel 1901 Iropdwry RECEIPT NO. SAM BERNARDINO Sac4amwlro C RI 9 ON-SALE BRRR i NINE 37070!1 , a . !111 IwrcvNnm•onnewl GTINC PLACE GfOGRAMKAI CODE i / 7615 a x H.mu dxaiMd x /db.o ~N r lewd T. NAMEIS) O! A-nltrwi(3) Temp. -ernlil Appled raldw Ses. 2~OU ~ LAtI, Nictual T.L. i ERMw Oolal Iuuanca EIIMiw Dale: L71L1, Ph111D R.l. 7. TYPE(SI OE TRANSACTION(S) iEE LIC. nPe S Or! loll !N 700.000 Cte 30 Ai011A1 !q 195.00 l Name e/ Ietiwr S. LaeaNan d SwMes-Mamba ad SMeel 1890 8irao aw., Unlt I15 L 116 Oly and Lp CoG Caunl S ~OGh° 8~{71N 51770 °'^ '~^ TOTAI 1 hemirn lkenNd, Show Type o. li<enN Mona /. Moiliry Addrpt (i(diMnnl ham SI-Numbx and Se i. An rvelINNllnaae Cih Limits rr.yl rrwwl i. mare yae xx Deco canwctw a a Nronyr 10. Haw you xx riohhd arty of Me poritiont d Me Aleahdi< Na IwxoSe ConHd Ao x rpulatiaro a( the Deporlmenl px- lainilq ro Me Aclt ~.~ 1I. Eaplan a "YES" ontwx b ibmr 9 a 10 on on aaahmenr which rhall M deemed poH d Ihif applkalion. 17. Applimnl a5nx (al Ih^I any menagr empbyed in on•wle liwnwd p4emitn will how all M. gwliflmliom of a licanue, and (b) Ihal M will not violab or cauw a permit b he ridaled any el Me proridom of Me Akoholk Mrxopr Control AO. 11 STATE OF CALIFORNIA County 'ol .___.iaa 2~•^'•Nt wa ______________Deh___~11+87__________.. VMr wrrNF N nrM, wrA wryn rlr.w r.r:Nw. Nrywr rNw. rr.r:Aw .:r, y :111 Iln x rM ryNrcmr. w xw M r4 NNmnn, .r Ninu N rM .Mlxurr rrryr.ryn..rw. w rM IrN.iN NNy.l:.n. Mt w.TwrrN rM Mw Mrr .ry1yNNn ur • MMII: i11 rMr M Mr rNI rM Iwr. piq wNLnrrw nN bwnr rM r r r4rwN wy rMr wA wN NI N rM rNn:wmn Moun n.N x. lit rMr n rFr rAwn :M oNx.nr aryln.nM Mr arr I:rwr w :nI'rw rnrpnr h Nn NNywrrr r N,Iw A.rwu w M ru:MrN rnlwrrM lirr I Iw .IrxA rMr NNn. MN; i.l 1Mr M r n•Ir .ONx. ww.M nwJw i :rN r:wN w riNrnrrM rn N . Iwo • INRM wn NrniMx:M ,nnrN :nl.:wr rMn n 101 • Ir.n r:rw.rr dq nwNrM•d. Nt rr wlrxA rM rmnlw NNu. 1 M1M/ wnM rM qNO w N O.xr r uMlip 1 nNxww. M r Ir r rrMirr N FwJwrrwr MOwrO w :am snr odhw N rrwndrr: OI rMr rM rnnJw wNwNW rr M wxM.nw^ M rrMr ~4 wNln1: a M I'vrmn ~nirA n. nw r M41.ry y pr Dgxrmmr \ r r u:n SIGN MERE ___________ __ e- AgLItATIOK Rr TRANfflROR ~7ATE OF CALIFORNIA County ol______________________________________Dah ___________.________________ UnM w^wlri N N NrA pu ~MN ri,NM1 N/IVl b,N~ n1iRn .M I r. III M n NN Iil.nrN, w wrl..n wrrr n rM r mrrW :M IwNUq r nllw NN.Ar. wr1 .rMw:W r nob Aril r mrx .,N:M:N n r I,MII: lit MnnM AxN1 :Nbr cpN.r.•NU• nMa NI :M n wANnliu ulU MurrW MN. nN p nnJx nM NN:I nn1 r r IrnNwr :NrynW m rM .ANr N :Irn nqL• nn :r w.b r nrlw nnN b. Mr OMnNw; OI rAN M nrrin n,Nlwr:n:r r xnlN Fw:rlw it :rwN r uJ1 rM n ::unl d n n. • 1.1411 ,wn.^L1 I nrN '~ Y4 Np wnN1ry M N. w nMnr 1M 1 ~Ilx gNNwiwr n M1IN n.M M. aq.rl;rwnl u • pnm • Irn4lnn pMx nn1 rNiw NA1~ndrw .r ^ NIrM w :niw. nr nNrrw N xoJUw; 1n rM r4 nrrlx nNlirnnr .wnr N r,rMren brnnrnnr rnn aNlk~ 1 w rM Inrrw _1M .n rld•M IrAiHr. n M OnryrMxnr ' i /~ a R, U W IV6~ NCaU FRIFIJ~ Ch~HESC K6~euaavr I ~re7r0: Dsf.2 CesE.e Csars2 ~'19D NMIENA~ Uuh' 1~ ll6 ~tiueb aF J iwPC.VT ~PnOSUry• __'-- • . _ _ _ _ FtmO C~u.~uaL ____ ~ J Q2~~q0 /J1NE L6Ml wctrt.~L. {.pW~I.~IV(Y BEN 7tQ Ear: R~ie~a,_ CdvwFarm~~~AUm-r~ (Gl~sr: F'ta~tl CD,U7RoL ~ .Ta~,.srzia ~~ ~~8~ 7 -CITY OF R~1NCH0 CtiCANONGA . STAFF REPORT /~,-,~ "~_~ OATE: October 21, 1987 T0: .City Council and City Manager j FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer ! BY: Vartan Vartanians, Associate Civii Engineer SUBJECT: Quitclaiming of a portion of Lot 8, Tract No. 13058 to the William Lyon Canpany for the purpose of its incorporation with the school site within the Victoria Grove Community, located westerly of Milliken Avenue between Baseline Road ' and Highland Avenue RECONIENa1TI0M: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, ordering quitclaiming of the subJect City property, authorizing the Mayor to execute a Quitclaim Deed on behalf of the Ctty, and authorizing the . City Clerk to certify the passage and adoption of this resolution and to cause a certified copy of same to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder. Background/Analysis Tentative Parcel Map 10902, located northerly of Fainmant Way at the westerly terminus of Victoria Park Lane, was approved by the Planning Commission on August 12, 1987. The purpose of the Parcel Map fs to create separate parcels for the existing City park and the school site located within the Victoria Grove Community. As a condition of approval of the tentative map, a portion of the City-awned and City-maintained green way located within lot B of Tract Mo. 13058, situated northerly of the school site is to De quitclaimed by the City and is to be transferred to the school site. The reason for this transfer of property 1s to place the new Tat line adjacent to the existing sidewalk along the green way to create an easily identifiable maintenance boundary between the scnool site and the City green way. ~ Res pe ctf ly submitted, i ~ i A V:dlw Attachments ~4 • RESOLUTION n0. 8 ~ - a.J~ A RESOLUTICN OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI~'1N64, CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNAROINO, STATE Of CALIFORN LI, ORDERING TO BE QUITCLAIMED, A PORTI CiI OF LOT B, TRACT N0. 13058 wNEREAS, Lot 8 of Tract Mo. 13058 as per map rewrded in Book 192, pages 57 through 61, inclusive, of the office of County Recorder of San Bernardinw County was dedicated to the City in fee simple for trails, open space, and storm drain purposes; and NHEREAS, in order to create a readily identifiable maintenance boundary between said City property and a proposed school site southerly of said City property, a portion of said lot fs to De quitclaimed by the City; and NNEREAS, said quitclatnwd portion of Lot 8 is to be incorporated with Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 10902, being subdivided by The Hilllam Lyon Company. HON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the Ctty of . Rancho Cucamonga, California, Section 1: The Council hereby finds iron alt the evidence submitted, that a port ono lot B, Tract No. 13058, is unnecessary for presets or future trail, open space, or storm drain purposes, and the City Council hereby makes its Order ouftcl of mina a mnrtinn rA ca1A L^t °., ••hi.h `GS `yeu, i w Liier described in a legal description and a map which are attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made a Dart hereof. Section 2: The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute a Corporation Quitclaim ee on half of the City to remise, release and quitclaim portions of said lot as specified above to The Hiliiam Lyon Company, a Caiifornia Corporation; Section 3: The City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution~o 6e recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, Cal ifornta; Section4; The City Clerk shall certify to the Dassage and adopt ton of this resa u on, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force 1`1 2 4 3 6 7 e 9 30 11 34 1JI 14 15 16 17 1B 19 20 21 22 23 24 23 26 ~ 2~ 2E 29 i SO 31 i 32 ~ EXHIBIT 'A' 24)-% :3.:3:'3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF QUZT'CLAIA DEED 54:: PROM CITY TO SCHOOL DISTRICT I BEING A PARCEL OF LAND WITHIN LOT '9' OF TRACT NO. 1305E IN THE [TTY OP RANCHO CVCAHONGA, COUNTY OP SAN BERNAROINC S TASE OF CALI FOANIA, AS SHOWN ON A NAP RELOADED IN BOOR .. PAGES 4) THROUGH 61 OF MAP BOOKS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COL'NC AEC'uRD'cR OF SAID COVNTY DESCRIBED AB FOL COWS: BEGINNING AT AN ANGLE POINT IN THE WESTERLY PORTION CP Tt SOVTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SATD LOT 'B'; SAZO POINT BE/t THL WESTERLY TERMINUS OP THAT CERTAIN COURSE ON SAID BOVNOAF LSNE SHOWN AS "N 80' 03' S8" W J07.77 FEET": SAID POINT AL'. BEING TXE MOET NORTHERLY NORTHWEST CORNER OP LOT 278 OF TRA( N0. 17022, A9 SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOR 191 PACES THROUGH 11 0! MAP BOOKS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ReCOROt OP SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE SAID LOT 'B' AND THE NORTHERLY BOVNDARY LINE OP SAID LOT 2TE B EO° 03. 4E" E 707.77 FEET AND S B9° JO' 00" E 163.35 FEF TO A POINT ON SAID BOUNDARY LINE: THENCE LEAVING SAID BOUNDAF LINE AND THROUGH A PORTION OP SAID LOT •P•• u n° 5nr e 2.14 PEET TO THE BEGINNING OP A TANGEIIT CURVE, CONCAVE WESTEPt AND HAVING A RADIUS OP 4.00 FEET; TXENC6 NORTHERLY AND WESTER[ ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44° 02' 40" r AqC DISTANCE OF B. 21 FEET; THENCE S 86° 52' 14" W 46.42 FE3 TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CVgVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY At HAVING A PAOIUS OP 105.00 PEET; THENCE WESTERLY AGCNC SA. CURVE THftOVGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19° 51' 77" AN ARC D25TAN: OF 140.78 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A PEVERSE TANGENT CVRV CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY' AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 795.J0 FEE' A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS N 16° 4J' 4)" E; THEN WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVfi THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OP 17° CB' S AN ARC DISTANCE OF 119.7E FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A PE'JEfl TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY ANO NAVI NG A RADIUS CF 290. FEET; A RADIAL GI NE TNROL'CH SAID 5 0° 74' 12" E, THENCE '•:ES°. E? ALONG SAID CVgVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2l' 15' 24". h 6 7 e 9 10 lli lE i 13 1~ 15 16 17 38 19 20 21 22 2S 24 2S 2A 2T i 28 29 SO ]1 J2 ARC OZS TANCE OP 117.74 FEET; THENCfi N 67° 1B' 47" W 58.2 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OP A TANGENT CURVE. CONCAVE SOUTNWESTERL' ANO HAVING A MDIUS OP 9.00 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY AN: SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE C 69° 21' 17^ AN AAC DISTANCE OF 10.89 FEET; THENC S 4I° 20' 00" w 23.]1 PEET TO A POLNT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDAR LINE OF SAID LOT 'B': SASD POINT BEING ON A CURVE, CONCAV WESTERLY AND HAVING A MOSVS OP a .ao FEET; A MDIAL LIN TO SAID POINT BEARS N S9° 00' 00" E; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALOH SAID BOUNDARY LINE AND SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTAL ANGL OP 30' S6' D2^ AN ARC DISTANCE OF 8.20 PEET TO A POINT C SAID CURVE: A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS S 80° OJ' 98" 'c SAID POINT ALSO BC2NG THE POINT OP BEGINNING OF TXe PARCE HERESN DESCRIBED. • CONTAINS: 7,591 $,P. OA 0.17d AC. ATTACH® HERETO ANO wm ~ ,,,_ .. _..~•. .., ,. OnGl~.n ENTtTLE ^exxinm ' B' •. THIS OOCUNENT HAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION. RY L. ; LR EA, L.S. 1163 ~~ r1 l1 u ~~ n~ 1 ~ I ~~ ~ L~ _ 1 ~1 ~~ ~w. F- ~~ V I •y~N 1^ m ^1 1 1n ) ~ y ,+l O \ \ 6 ~ J U :'°' 1 = ~ / S ~-k F7 3O ~ W Wm / n ~O 1 ~ « ^ o P ` e Nti 0 \\I I"1 LL O W } J .n uJ ~ M1 Ory • w ' ` \ aoi M r ; ~~ ~ ~1 o w ~•rl 2 ~ ~1 1 (~ n° X11 1 ~~ M 1 ~ ~ ~ `M J' - 1 ^1 ~..rJ 1 L^ ~ ~1 M _ LLB _~ mil ~~ ` ' ~ ~~ m W '7Yd MFI,SAM t ~~ ~) J G~~` -' / W ~J`~\ a Pb 3~~ob\ = oa~ W - w ~' R v ni annne n = e~ona e W H netl N np~ 4 N•.. r ~ 000000 OnnwpP r F : r ~wa ~ nN JWW Onwnnn V o.. i ~nnn.•p r tie rv Vy. en-°~r~ e r ~ < w~nwp A W ~ne --ne- m Ve rpr4Cp iei -nn~ee HIGHLAND AU ENUE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DIVL9ION • v V N ~~ QUITGLAIHING POR. LOT B, TP„ 130' Vii. u: ~~ --- CITY OF RANCHO CI:C?,MONGA • STAFF REPORT ~~ Oat e: October 21, 1987 ~ ' I To: City Council and City Manager j Fran: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer i By: 81ane N. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer j SubJect: Award and execution of Professional Services Agreement with L.D. King, Inc., to prepare Plans, Specifications and ~ Estimates for Base Line Road Storm Drain and Street Improvements from I-15 to Nest of Etlwanda Avenue RECOMIENDATI011• It is hereby recommended to award and execute a Professional Services Agreement with L.D. King, Inc. to prepare Plans, Specifications and Estimates aiong with various engineering studies and ffeld surveys for Base Ltne Road Storm Drain and Street Improvements from I-15 to Nest of Etiwanda Avenue. Such work to De done for a fee not to exceed f64,850.00 to be paid from Systems Development Fund • BACISNOUIID/AMLYSIS• On September 30, 1987, four firms responding to a Request for Proposals for the Base Line Protect, submitted detailed scope of work, background refer cr cc s,d da; igr L26F a e,ienLi aia Lu Lne icy or Nancho Cucamonga. All four teams met the professional and scope of service requirements established by staff. A ranking of the fee Droposals are listed below: L.D. King, Inc. (64,850.00 G.P.S. Consulting Civil Engineer=_ S?2,950.00 Don Greek and Associates f95,849.00 John Corollo Engineering f98,871.00 - 5104,412.00 Staff recommends L.D. King for award of the pro3ect. the Not to Exceed Fee will be paid Fran the Systems Development Fund and is included in the Capital Improvement Program list for 1986-81 with budget allocation they of ore. i Respectfu submitted, R Attachment a~+ ~zH:a.r .~~ • ~~ September 30, 1987 l94Y! 42 !!lYi~!! To Provide Profeuieaal maglueriaq and tur-e71aq prvioes for the preparatioa of coaatraotioa D1aas, speoifioatioa• aad ingineer•• mstiute !or rideaiaq o! mueliae woad tram S00 fast, more or rasa, vest of stiraada llvaaaa, easterl7 to th• city liana at/O! near Z-1a lreewa7, apProzlaatel] 1,200 LSaaar feeti also store Drain Sapreveaeats frog ltiwada Avenue to 2,200 fast urn or late easterly, laoludiaq temporary drainage buia Suk 1. wsiga Coordiaatioa wltb Cit7 aad other Couultaats A project base map or plan shall W prepared by the Consultant, Task 7 - Iv, to assist the City's Tratlic Planner in his workings, showing bas• topography, existing iaprovements and • utilities. A traffic signal plan for th• astatine/Etiwanda intertaation and design recomaendationt prepared by the Traffic Planner will guide the Consultant in street plan design. The base up will also serve as a template for the preparation of the final street, storm drain and striping and signing plane for th. _,j.~._ The Consultant will be retponsibl• for assembling together the final bid package, including tra!!ic signal, traffic striping and signing plans, specilications and estimates from the City's Traffic Planner, alt to be included with the street and storm drain plane. Task Z. Dtora Drmim lYdrelogT Dtudy Prepare a Storm Drain Hydrology Study for Nester Plan Storm Drain XV-ld. Design Hydraulics for ^uch ^tora drain to include calculations for pipe sizing, catch basin sizing, and possible temporary drainage basin. Prepare design calculation^ and construction plans for a temporary drainage basin as shown in the City's Project Study Report. ~~ a~ ~xHta;r °a (cnn't) ~~ Page Two 6COPA O7 gAYICAI September 30, 1987 Task 3. survey Aer~iaes to inolude~ a. Centerline control and stationing. b. Topography from 15• beyond the ultimata right-ot-way limits. c. Crou-sections at 50• maxirum intervals, including grade brealu, driveway and critical locations. d. Field nobs to be delivered to the City for record. e. Property lino surveys to locate front property corners for Right-of-Nay Acquisition. Task ~. A1ght-Of-lla>• AssearoD sad AAgiaNrinq 1. Order and obtain preliminary title reports for adjoining properties for the length o! the project, 27 separate parcels. 2. The Consultant shall define the ultimata Right-of-Nay and interim Right-of-Way acquisitions. An raseAent plat for • each effected property and saeesent description shall ba prepared. 3. Right-of-NSy negotiations and appraisals shall be oerterm.A *~ t::~ ~•tj. Teak S. otilit7 AesearoD 1. Research with local utility firms to obtain utility records and maps within the project limits. 2. Plot ell utilities in plan view on the plans. 3. Recommend utilitie^ to b• potholed and provide survey aaristance to record depth and location confirmation during the potholing. 4. Upon approval of first plan check, provide two (2) copies of the plane for each utility compnny to be sent along with a preliminary notice of construction and utility questionnaire as prepared by the City. 5. Keep a log of utility workings, recording responae• to the Preliminary Notices. • .~~ eYMiBi? "A" (con't) ~ L~C11'IG Page Three scope oa sskvzesr September J0, 1987 6. Meet with utility companies to coordinate for. relocation and/or grade adjustments required by the proposed construction. Teak i. prOjeot 111tl Prepare and maintain project design files for transmittal to the City at the completion of the project design Tack 7. COmetraaliom Pleas Prepare finished or complete street iaprovement and storm drain construction plans in accordance vith City Standard drawings Sncludinq: I. Title sheet shoving: • a. xitle b. Vicinity and location aappings and plan sheet indexing c. Utility end drawing legends d. Benchmark and basi^ of bearings •. construction quentitles f. 3tanAaM ~i ~~~r._~~ -~~ LitiO `uiJGn~ ii. Plan and Profiles for Street Iaprovsmenta showing: a. Topography to 1S' beyond the ultimata Right-ot-Way minimum. b. Centerline control and stationing c. Right-Dl-Nay limits interim and tutors d. Lot lines from Assessor's parcel Naps e. A.P.N. numbering o! street fronting parcels t. Utility plotting g. Proposed alignment for storm drain and catch basin installation h. Existing and proposed protile• for centerline edge of pavements and top of curbs i. Construction limits and instructions j. Catch basin local depressions iii. Storm Drain plans (separate Iron street drawings) Using base topo from street drawings prepare Plan and Profile sheets for storm drain showing: a7 E%HiBIT "r (con't) L~(1~1G ~ Page Four BCOPS O>/ mttVLCmm September ]0, 1987 a. Storm Drain centerline control and stationing b. Plan view of storm drain c. All utility lines burled and overhead d. Profile of storm drain e. H.C.L. plottings t. Hydraulic tabllnq, pipe sizes and Qs q. Lateral 11na profiles h. Varicus details for maMoles connect laterals, etc. i. A basin grading plan for the temporary Llood control basin showing: i) Property acquisition 2) Sesin hydraulics to: a. Size basin excavation b. Sias spillway or overflow or connecticn to the ezUtinq freeway drains c. Size a throttled outlet to reduce drainage out of this basin into Eeat Avenue to its present level. or to the acceptance of the City IV. Prepare 'vase street plan for use by others in preparing alignment atudles by others as well as acti nn w. ._ __~~ °Rx! fo. a.-iyl,.y and signing plan detail: , ghost in as background a. Shoe lane striping b. cross walla c. Traffic Legends d. Raised markers ExLtlna Sianinc a. Advanced warning signs b. Speed limits c. Parking d. eta. • (Shaw what is existing es say be considered for removal and/or replacement in the ultimate construction) Task •. loubdatioa 2a~estigatioa Engineering Evaluation and Design for Storm Drain Design and • Pavement Replacement and/or Resurfacing, including Soils Investigation: a$ .xn;a: (cor t)~ ~ L~K111G Page Fiva BCOY! O7 aIAOIC=a September 30, 1987 A hollow stem, auger-typo drill rig will ba utilized to perform both storm drain and pavement invaatigations simultaneously. SOZIS REPORT For Storm drain a. Soil classiLication and boring logs 8. Bedding conditions and requirements for any spacial bedding consldaration •xiatinq annd equivalancas c. Cround wetar conditior• d. Shoring raqulramants S. For Straai a. Soils claasiticatlona b. Subgreda conditions c. A-values • d. Structural section racoa~endation borings will beytakan Lto a maximumadapth of 20i fastoand willebe continuously logged. Subsurfeca conditions that could affect the proposed storm drain constrvction will ba noted. Samples will also ba taken rapresantetiva of the probable street subgrada soils. Zn addition, after removal o! the auger lrom the baaanmatarialhiitnany,owillaba notad.coNoractualdasphait concrete ~ cores will ba recovered. Bulk sampla^ of soils will also be taken trom the adiacant should areas. Four (0) borings will ba dons for the storm drain construction, it will ba necessary to place several additional shallow borings on Baseline Road to sample specifically for pavement etrveturai section design recommendations. Criteria will b• developed for the storm drain construction, including trench wall stability, nand equivalent, sieve anelysia and shoring. Information concerning expected difficulty with i excavation will also ba made at that time, including such things 1 as ground water or rock. 7q exe:e;r (con't)~ L~CIt1G ~ Page Six 6COP/ 01 /mmvIC// September 30, 1987 Regard ing the pavement structural section design recommendations, a civil engineer will visit the site and make notes on the condition of the existing asphalt concrete pavement. Areas requiring removal and/or overlay will be sapped. R-values with aDPropriate TZ will then be utilized to develop the street structural section. The structural section design given will be far new construction, and where practical, an overlay of the existing section. R-value tests will b• performed on representative eubgrade soils in order that appropriate structural section design raeommendations can be made. Tut f. Inter-hgsmoy Coordlnstlea !os appreval to Coaatraat, laoludiaq preparatiea or pezait applloatioass a. Submit storm drain and street improvement construction plans. to caltrane for their review and approval to construct the approved improvements within their right-ot-way. T~~L 1n __ ___ _ ___ ° ~. may. VY V~°V• eweVallY•G1Ym• Yelaq ^DOller plate° spse111oatioas provided b] Citt, Saoludiagt a. Boiler Plate by City: • Notice inviting bids • Instruction to bidders • Contract proposal (by consultant) • Bidders information • Agreuent • Gonda end insurance forms • General conditions b. Spacial provisions shall be prepared by the consultant. c. Tha Consultant .hall prepare a standard plan reference listing and copies for inclusion in the appendix. Teak il. /avlronmealal ltevi•r/ Prepare CEQA Envizonm•ntal Reviews - Parts 1 and 2 7.) ezeia;r "a" (con'[) • ~~ Page Seven BCOPf OI /1fVSCif September 30, 1987 Taek 12. PrweaatrYOtlea Coaterwee Attend Preconatruction Conference and Provide Dee iqn Coordination during construction 31 EXH.B:T "B" r1 L J N I L I m c _______________ __~_~______ __ _______ _ _______sPc g acTl~anPtl E w Iq mu I M+4 rom ILn 6J 16P su I a N T I G ,r C V IU R N C __________ ..____ _ ___ _____ __ ~______ _______SUeId 7SOIQ O$ O E u ~ ~ ~. v me LN F C m ~~pp C q / .. c --'- '--- ----' -- --- --- -- - ~$-- -------'- 0 a m • o m U 03370tld O.C 37I10N m Y ro v N u N G o. m N ~ OI V o. Y d U W N .I N N `u F w -TW N 4 O GF 0. N u A v N L _ / Ip T. ~ >. d y u m u m n U U U m t ~ ~ t m P u m O L -~ Y u ~p u u 'O -. L o 3 N C 0 c ~ C E m c~ R L C T C C V N d 'O >. ~ A 'O 0 10 d ~/ t E u+ ~. a .~ 3 C -I .r a 3 0 S ti O. I N u y N V -~ `u ~ N Y C n -~ U O r C U C N O C 7.u N I 'A 'M m m am '~ L'0 ~ A e p. .i d 'd a• 0 A ~.i Y tq N Y F x C Y U Y 0. Y U F U ~ N h V) 8i N N F m m m m m m G F F F F F F Z ~~ ~~ L.0. KIM, Irw. 2t5t Eaat •D' Street Suae i40r1 Ontano. CaLiprma 9:76a 171a1 yEe.~/p ENGINEEae/PIANNeIIa September 30, 1987 44!{Y!MlaTS41! Provide Protesaioaal Engiaeeriaq and surveyiaq cervices for the preparation o! Construotiori P1aas, apeoiliaations ana Eagineer~s Estimate for rideaiaq of Haeeliae Goad from S00 feet, more or lass, cast of Etiraada avenue, eaatesly to the City limits at/or near I-iS ~reeray, approEimataly x,700 Linear 7eett also Storm Oraia Iaprovaeats from Etiraada aveane to 7,400 fee! more or lass easterly, inalndiaq temporary drainage baaia Estimated soar Task 1 S 750 . Task 2 $ 7,500 Teak 1 $ 5,500 Talk 4 $10,000 Talk 5 $10,000 Talk 6 -n- 'l~ask 7 $29,000 Talk 8 $ 4,000 Task 9 $ 1,500 Talk 10 $ 3,600 Task 11 $ 500 Task 12 ~ 1.500 TOTaL {i 4,aS0 The actual cost of each tack may vary somewhat from that shown above, however, the total not to exceed cost of all task is a maximum court to the project of $64,850 for protsaeional engineering aervicea. cervices to N provided by the Cityt • Printing of final plans and specifications for bidding and construction purposes • advertising the projeci for construction bidr • Right-of-Way appraisals and acquisition 33 EXHIBIT "„ (con't) ~~ RATE SCHEDULE August, 1987 Pri ncipat ................................................ ......... Project Manager ................................................... Survey Coordinator ................................................ Project Planner ..................:................................ Project Engineer .................................................. Designer .......................................................... Associate Engineer ............................... ........ ......... Senior Drafter/Calculator ......................................... Drafter ............................................. .............. Assistant Engineer/Planner ........................................ Junior Engineer/Planner ........................................... Engineering Aide [I ............................................... Engineering Aitle I ................................................ Administrative Assistant .......................................... Production Typist ................................................. 3-Man Survey Crew ................................................. 2-Man Survey Crew ................................................. Travel Time (when in excess of B hrs work time per day) 3-Man Survey Crew ............................................... L-Man Survey Crew ............................................... Hourly Rate 90.00 75.00 65.00 65.00 65.00 65.00 60.00 60.00 45.D0 50.00 32.00 29.00 22.00 27. GO 22.GD 150. C0 t22.0u an nn 56.00 In-House Reproduction ............................................. Cost Printing and Materials ....... ................................ COSt + 15% Express Mai:/Courier/Next Oay Service ............................. Cast Mileage ........................................................... 30Q/mile Special Consultant Services ....................................... Cost + 15% • • NOTE: 4ourly rates are subject to increase August 1, 19od, due to labor • agreements, salary adjustments, and increases in operating expenses. 3'}- • RESOLUTION N0. Yj ~ -SS~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO ANARD AND EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT KITH L. D. KING, INC., OF ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA TO PREPARE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIXATES FOR BASE LINE ROAD STORM DRAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS FAOM I-15 TO NEST OF ETINANDA AVENUE NHEREAS, the C1ty Council of the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga desires to Install a Master Plan Storne Dre1n 1n Base Line Road and m otherwise widen and improve Base Line Road from I-15 m a point Nest of Ettwanda Avenue; NHEREAS, the engineering and planning fins of L.D.K1ng, Inc., has responded to a written Request for Proposal issued by the C1ty >D provide professional engineering services for lard surveys, engineering design, studies and calculations, with services for the preparetion of Plans, Specifications and Estimates for a Master Plan Stores Dre1n to Base L1ne Road and to otherwise widen and improve Base Line Roadfrom I-15 to a point Nest of Ettwanda Avenue Dy submitting a fee proposal for the sane; BE tT THEREFORE RESOLVED, to award and execute a Profestlonal Services Agreement with L.D. K1ng, Inc., tD provide professional engineering services to prepare Plans, Specifications and Estimates for a Master Plan Stores Drain to Base Line Road arM for plans and specification to provide for • the w/dening and improving of Base L1ne Road from the East City L1m1ts at the I-15 Freewyy to a point Nest of Et- panda Avenue. Such work shall be performe± for a fee Not to Exceed =64,850.00 to be funded by Systems Development Fund. A contingency fund in an amount of l0i of the contract amount shall also be estaDllshed for use under the approval aM direction of the C1ty Engineer for extra work pr change order during the course of the plan preparetion. ~7 ---- CITY OF ~2a\CHO CCCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ,~ ~ ~-~~ Date: October 21, 1987 To: City Council and City Manager w I i From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Civil Engineer ~ Su bt ect: Award and Execution of Professional Services Agreement with BS( Consultants, Inc., to prepare Plans, Specifications and Estimates for 19th Street Improvem~ts from Hermosa to Cartilla Avenue I RECOMIENBi1TI0N I It is hereby recommended to award and execute a Professional Services A greeneM with BSI Consultants, Inc. to prepare Plans, Specifications and Estimates along with engineering studies and field surveys for i9th Street from Hermosa to Cartilla Avenue. Such work to be done for a fee Not to Exceed f38,500.00 to be paid from Systems Developma~t Fund. • BACIt6R01110/AIMLYSIS• On September 15, 1987, four engineering firms responding to a Request for Proposal for the 19th Street Improvement from Hermosa to Cartilla Avenue, submitted detailed scope of work. backaraund rvfaran rn ann wo~i„~ row credentials to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ~ ~ J~~ All four teams met the professional and scope of service requirements established by staff. A ranking of the fee proposals are as follows: 85I Consultants, Inc. f38,500.00 RSL Consulting Engineers 43,125.00 Mtldan Associates 44,900.00 Robert Bien Nilliam Frost Associates 52,600,00 Staff recommended BSI far award of the protect. Thy Not to Exceed fee will be pafd from Systems Development Fund and is included in the Capital Improvement Program List for 1986-81 with budget allocation therefore. I Re< lly submitted, RH Attachment 3~ • RESOLUTION N0. ~ ~ ~ ~ S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM]N GA TO AN11RD ANO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREE!£NT KITH BSI CONSULTANTS, INC., TO PREPARE PLANS, SPECIFICATI0IS AND ESTIM4TES FOR 19TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM MERMOSA TO fARTILLA AVENUE NHEREAS, the City Cowcil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga desires to improve 19th Street from Hermosa to Cartilla Avenue; responded to HaRwrltten~Request forn Proposaloissued bynthe ~ity toncprovide professional engineering services for land surveys, engineering design, studies and calculations, with services for the preparation of Plans, Specifications and Estimates for the Improvement of 19th Street fran Hermosa Avenue to Cartilla Avenue by submitting a fee proposal for the same; BE IT THEREFgtE RESOLVED, to award and execute a Professional Services Agreement with BSI Consultants, Inc., to provide professional engineering services to prepare Plans, Specifications and Estimates far the Improvement of 19th Street from Hermosa to Cartilla Avenue. Such work shall be performed for a fee Not to Exceed 538,500.00 to • be funded by Systens Development Funds. A contingency fund in an amount of lOX of the contract anount shall also be established far usa under fire approval and direction of the City Engineer for extra work ar drange order during the course of the plan preparation. ~_ ~. ~~-~ 3'7 CITY OF RANCHO CCCAi~IONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: T0: f ROM: BY: SUBJECT: October 21, 1987 City Council and Ctty Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Natter C. Stickney, Associate Civil Engineer ~~U.NO \\ \\^ <~ ~ , x ~~ r ~" 1977 Approval to award and execute Professional Service Agreement for planning and design services relating to the updating of the City s Master Plan of Drainage for the Etlwanda and San Sev/ne areas to BS1, Inc. for the amount of 585,000.00 to be funded from Drainage funds with partial reimbursement (550,000.00) from RDA funds. RECOIIEIMTIOM: It 1s recoamlended that the City Council award the protect for the Etlwanda and San Sevine areas Master Plan of Drainage to BSI, Inc., authorize Lhe Mayor and City Clerk to execute tho- contract documents for said prolecL and authorize the AdminlstraH ve Services Dl rector to expend Funds5wtth pa 8ttal~reimbursement of 550,000 from RDA fu ds. from Drainage BACKGROUND The anticipated development activity in the Etiwanda and San Sevine areas has caused the need for a thorough examination of the area's drainage adequacy along with the establishment of interim drainage facilities to accamodate development until the ultimate regional systems are Installed. In addition, a fair and equitable fee structure is needed for the area which will reflect those costs and benefits associated with both the proposed regional systems and master plan systems. ANALYSIS: Nith the state of development in the Etiwanda and San Sevine areas and with the anticipated development expected for those areas it has become necessary to review the status of the drainage facilities and to examine the impact future development will have. The Etiwanda and San Sevine Areas Master Plan of Drainage study will consist of reviewing those drainage facilities necessary prior to development occuring. This would be addressed both on an interim and ultimate basis. 3g CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT OCTOBER 21, 1987 PAGE 2 • The regional systeaa (Oay, Upper Etlwanda, Upper San Sevlne, the coabined Etiwanda/San Sevlne and the lower Etiwanda) will be reviewed to establish a Fee strutturc to use 1n offsetting the City's cost of Lhase regional facilities. This stogy will also allow the City to best use existing drainage facllittes and to pian for future drainage require~ents. Res o , su ^itted,~ RNM:NS:~h ~1 U - CITY OF RAtiCHO CCCA~IONGA • STAFF REPORT / _~ 44TE: October 21, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steven Allen, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Award and execute the Professional Services Agreement for the contract inspection servftes for the Archibald Avenue Realignment pro,{ect to NBS/Cowry, Inwrporated, far the amount of f14,712.00 to be funded from Systems 6evelopment RECiII/END11TI011: It is recommended that City Council accept the submitted proposal, award and execute the Professional Services Agreement for contract impaction services for the Archibald Avenue Reallgmment project to NBS/Cowry, Incorporated for the amount of f14,712.00, and authorize the • Admtnfstrattve Services Director to expend f16,200.00 (f14,712.00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Systans Development. Background/Analysts Staff has reaues tad; racotvaA enH rwu(aunA .. ,lisic_.1 Cns ._~ prcF,;,,;,1; ~ submftted by various consultant firms and has determined that NBS/Cowry, Incorporated is best suited to provide subJect services for this protect. Staff has received from NBS/Cowry, Incorporated executed Professional Services Agreements and Tm urence documents reviewed them and found then to be complete and in accordance wfth the City~s raga i repents . Res pectfu submitted, 1 RH •S d • - CITY OF' RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 21, 1987 T0: -City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steven Allen, Jr. Civil Engineer ;~~,. ~~. SUBJCCT: Execute contract for the Area VII Storm Drain, Phase II Improvement Pro3ect awarded to Drainage Construction, Inc. for the amount of 5835,632.00 to be funded fran Drainage Funds. RECONEN0ITION: !t is recaimended that City Coimctl authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for the Area YIt Storm Drain, Phase II Improvement Pro3ect, and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend f920,000 (f835,632.00 plus lOX contigeiry) to be funded trap Drainage Funds. Background/Analysis Dm OttnMr 7 laR7 r~ra rn~xi~i1 ,nA~A t~:• •~.~^^~ _ •"` --i r~ .. J~~. yr Wr..~ .jc Construction, Inca Staff has received from Drainage Construction, Inc. executed contract documents, Donds and insurance documents; reviewed them and found than to be ~amplete and in accordance with the contract proposal . Respec.f udattted, RH cc: Purchasing L n DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: • ,~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT October 21, 1987 City Council and City Manager Russeil H. Maguire, City Engineer Slane Frandsen, Sr. Civil Engineer ~ ~~c.~.~rot~ ~'~~'~ <-; , ~ > y, ~ - oi~ ~~ - }~ = FII Sj z 19Ji I Execution of Contract Change Order B2 to Professional Services Agreement with DGA d Associates for Contract Administration Services C.0. 87-20 RECOMMEMOJITION: It is hereby recommended to execute contract change order l2 with Oon Greek and Associates for contract administration for various design protects. Background/Analysis The firm of Don Greek and Associates was engaged earlier this year to perform predesign studies for two projects which has now been expanded to four projects, including 19th, all four phases, Alta Loma Assessment District, Banyon Street extension d bridge, I 15/ Route 60 interchange. It is found necessary to expand their eriaina7 rnnrr.~• r,. .,, ._~,. adm tional workings encountered. The Change Order is for 515,000.00 to bring the contract total to 545,000 being paid from the fund source For each of the various Drodect fundlnes. Respectf y submitted, RH •BF• 2 - CIT]' OF RANCHO CCCA~IONGA • STAFF REPORT DATE: October 21, 1987 70: •City Council and Cfty Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 8Y: Vartan V. Vart ani ans, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PIPELINE LICENSE BETWEEN THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC N N N N M N N - Loca eas en venue, na o ase ine oad and also, the approval of an agreement between The NTlltan Lyon Company, the developer, and the City. RECOMMERdITI011: IC is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution • I approving the Pipeline License between the City and the Southern Pacific Transportation company and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same. In addition, it is recommended that City Council adopt the attached agreement between the City and The Million Lyon Company and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same. Background/Analysts the Southern pacific Transportation Company has issued the attached Pipeline License to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of certain storm drain facilities within the railroad right-of-way in connection with development of Tract Mo. 13022 (Victoria Groves j, located east of Milliken Avenue, between Highland Avenue and Base Line Road. The Nilliam Lyon Canpany, the developer c" said tract, has submitted an agreement to the City (attached for approval) to perform all of the City obligations as stipulated in said Pipeline License. Respec 1 submitted, C / , RHM VYV: Attachments ~~ • RESOLUTIQY N0. `rj 7 ' `~ 5~ A RESOLUTIOI OF THE CITY COINCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAiDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PIPELINE LICENSE BETNEEN THE CITY AND THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY FOR THE INSTALLATION ff STORM DRAIN FACILITIES MITHIN THE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-W1Y OI CONJINCTION KITH DEVELOPMENT ff TRACT N0. 13022 (VICTORIA GROVES) NHEREAS, storm drain facilfties are required to De installed within the Southern Pacific Transportation Company right-of-way near the Engineer's Station 2203+64, M11e Post 524.91, County of San Bernardino, State of California, for pro3ect, Tract No. 13022 (Victoria Groves); and NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucanonga, California, has for its consideration a Pipeline License between the Southern Pacific Transportation Caapany and the City for the right to install the storm drain fadlities at the above location. HOU, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaaonga, California, that said Pipeline Licerrse be and the ssae is hereby approved, and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to sign same on behalf of the city of Rancho Cucangnga. J ti W VICINITY MAP CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~- ~r q-5 ".-.-. _._.-.~. _. r._.~ r._._._._._...z i'_. _. _._~._ _ _._.. _._.__ i -• ~ r 1 LJ -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 21, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civit Engineer ~, SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication between Robert Hoffman, Jr. and the City of Ranch Cucamonga for Street Frontage improvements at 9782 Arrow Route NELOI(tEN011TIO1 It is recammeoded that Ctty Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Agreement for lnstallation of Public Improvme~ and Dedication betwedi Robert Hoffman, Jr, and the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga. The attached subJ ect Agreement between the City and Robert Hoffman, Jr. provides far street improvements which lnciude curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights and street pavements along Mr. Hoffman's Arrow Route Frontage. Mr. Hoffman has agreed to grant to the City a RnaAyay auR to allow iur file wiaemng and improvement of Arrow Route in return for the wnstruction of said improvements. Said street improvements will be constructed in cor~unctton wlth the City's Arrow Route Phase I Street Improveaent PrdJect from Archibald Avenue to Turner Avenue, Res s bmitted, RH :LEH:pam Attachment RESOLUTIDI N0. ~ / ' ~S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CODICIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCN61, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLRTION OF PUBLIC IIVROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM ROBERT HOFFIMN, JR. AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY LLERK TO SIGY SAFE WHEREAS, the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to estatrlish requirements for construction of frontage improvements in caN unction with the Arran Route Phase I Street Improvement Vro~ect; and MHEREAS, installation of curb, gutter, drive approach, sidewalk, street itghts and street pavements located at 97ffi Arrow Route to be made part of the Arraw Route Phase I Street Improvement ProJed; and WHEREAS, Robert Hoffman, Jr. has agreed to dedicate Right-of-May as reimbursement to the Lity for said improvements. NOM, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept said Improvement Agreement, • authorizes the Wayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Cierk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. ~~ I I X47 • - CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: October 21, 1987 Lity Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer ~,. ~f Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norkz Inspector~~y~~ Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Map 79(12, located on east side of Mayberry Avenue south of Nilson Avenue, submitted by Arlo M. Blair. RECOI/EIId1TI011 It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and securfty and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarmtee the constructfon of the public improvements for Parcel Map 7902 were approved by the City Council on August 19, 1986, in the following amounts. ~aicnl'ul Yerr onnance Bond: 549,000 Labor and Material Bond: f24,500 The developer, Arlo N. Blair, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Resp tf 1 submitted, r R M: Attachments +~~ • RESOLUTION N0. ~S 7 -~ S a A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, gPPROYING IWROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 7902 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, CallforM a, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on October 21, 1981, 6y Arlo W. 81air as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adJacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the east side of Mayberry Avenue south of Nilson gvenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvemeits, described in said Improvement Agreemenn and subJect to the terms thereof, is to be done in coniunctton with the development of said Parcel Map 7902; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which 15 identified in said Improvement Extension Agreement. NOM, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, CaliforM a, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 'l l • CITY OF RANCHO CUCADiONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: October 21, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Pubilc Norks Inspectortypr~ ~~cntitp,~ ~ ~ ;:; _~ c' p i^ Fi D %Z ~. ~ 19%% SU&IECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12944, located on Highland Avenue east of Milliken Avenue, submitted by Marlborough Development RECOMNEIOi1TI0M It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGRWNO Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securtty to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 12941 were approved by the City Council on August 7, 1986, in the following amounts. raithfui rerformance Bond: f136,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: f67,S00.00 The developer, Marlborough Development, 1s requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said tmprorement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension arc available in the City Clerk's Office. Res s ~mitted, _- • G: Attachments ~.1 • RESOLUTION N0. ~ ~ ' ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON011, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT ABREElENi E%TENSION ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12944 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideratton an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on October 21 1987, by Marlborough Development as developer, for the lnprovement of public right-of-way adJacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on Highland Avenue east of Milliken Avenue; and InprovementE Agreement andt subJect to the rater ~ thereot~, desc~ bbe done a1n con,iunctlon with the development of said Tract 12944; and MNEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identlPled to sold Improvement Agreement Extension. NON, THEREFORE, BE li RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said ImproremenL Agreement Extension and • said Iagrovement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. i " / ~ ~ t EJ ,rjl --CITY OF R~1NCH0 CCCA~iONG.A • STAFF REPORT ~' DATE: October 21, 1987 ~ ~~ i ~ T0: City Council and City Manager FROM; Russell R. Maguire, City Engineer ~ 8Y: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for DR 86-36 located on the south side of Sixth Street, between Utica and Cleveland Avenues, submitted Dy General Dynanics ' Valley Systems Division I RELOMIEi1D11TI011 It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. • ANALYSIS/BACNGROUNO OR 8636 located on the south side of Sixth Street, between Uttta and Cleveland Avenues, in the General Ind ustrfal Development pistrict, was approved by the Planning Cemmisston on November 25, 1986. iiie Developer, general Uynamtcs Palley Systems Division, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvenents in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: (880,000 Labor and Material Bond: 5440,000 Copfes of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk s Office. A letter of approval has been received fran the Cucamonga County Nater 0istri ct. j Respe tfully submitted, ~ I R :L :sd _~ Attachments 5~.. • RESOLUi10N N0. `~ ~ ' / ~' A RESOLUTICM OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY DF RANCHO CUCAMOMGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPRDYEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEM N0. 86-36 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on August 14, 1987, by General Dynamics Systems Division as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adiacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the south side of Sixth Street, between Utica and Cleveland gvenues;' and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subJect to the tenors thereof, is to be done in codunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, Development Review No. 86-36; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficfent improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement AgreeneM and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. r, 3 • ~~ _~v` En.w _ ._ --t~~- ~ _ ~- s~' ~ CITY OF ~' RANCHO CUCAMONGA '~.$ o.a. 86-36 ENGIIIEERIIdG DM.9ION ElLI~1T: 5¢ Qti Nui. s -CITY OF RANCHO CL'CA~IONGA • STAFF REPORT DATE: October 21, 1987 T0: 'City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steven Allen, Jr. Ctvil Engineer SUBJECT: Execute contract for the Haven Avenue Medians Beautification, Phase II Improvement Protect from 4th Street to Arrow Route awarded to Hacienda Landscape for the amount of f719,661.84 to be funded from Beautification Funds. REi]IMENDATIOII: It is recamiended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for the Haven Avenue Medians Beautiffcation, Phase 1[ Improvement Protect, and authorize the • Administrative Services Director to expend f792,OOO (f719,661.84 plus 1Of contigency) to be funded from 8eautificatton funds, Background/Analysis On October 7, 1987, City Council awarded the subject pro~ett to Hacienda Landscape, Inc. Staff has received from Hacienda Landscape, Inc. executed contract documents, bonds and insurance documents; reviewed them and found then to be complete and in accordance with the contract proposal. Resp,S 11 submitted, 1 RHM; cc: Purchasing I ~~ .°"i Ei • / -- - CITY pF RgSCNO CI'CAStOUG,Y ~ STAFF REPpRT October 21, 1987 ,~r i0: City Council and City Manager -' FROM' Russell H, I Maguire, City Engineer j BY: Steven i Allen, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Acce t ~ Vinep the Arrow Route and Ninth ~ y~'d Avenue and Archibald Street Improvements h and aPProvezthehf'C~ty Engineer to filesaoomPlete, releaseebonds ,i anal r_ontract amount Notice of Completion" of 5637,980.b3, REC01/ENp17I0N: Street Imcroo ended that the City Counci) accept the of completion" and aut the amount ofenents as h°rpZettheareleaseo the City Eng neerwtoofile ~d Ninth • f63,19g.00 for~87,422.64 and accept the ; oP the Faithful Perform a Notice amount of 98.06e and atheaut ~~ Melease o~n8ond in thecaaount of E143,7 563,7 horize 11.32, 35 days after the ~ebor anc ~tertals the retention in the been received, Also approve the fin ala~~~ said notice if the no claimsn have I Background/Analysis con_ ~t amount of 5637,980,63. the subJect ornta~. ... , °"J specifications ~ °een completed in accordanc contract amount and to the satisfaction a with the additional if 5637,980.63 of the Cft aPProved lan removal which includes five Engineer, the final I Arrow on a Ninth Str irri9aRoute~~removal~d reconseetcprope~t curb and gutterhap~q~o~rROUte,~ i ~d Leon Str , and fore al ae ment of a Cross gutters saturated subgrade on ppro ved eet was 5287, by Councfl for 5251, 043.OSextension totaling 29andrel at Arrow Route ~ 422.64 and the revised amount the original amount days as previously Res pe ttfu aPpr oved by Council iSpro ved by Council submitted, 5637,980,63, I f ~ RNM: I Attachments I cc: Purchasing 5(0 n u RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMCN G4 P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga,~California 91130 WHEN RECORDED MOIL T0: CITY CLERK CITY OF AANCHO CUfAMDNG4 P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91130 NOTICE OF COMDLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate is: • Arraw Route and Ninth Street Improvements 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONfWf, 9320-C Base Line Road, P. 0. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 3. i1n Lix: 2iSt doy of DLLO"e^ taR7 rhare was camDl et ed on the hereinafter described real property the cork af~improvement set forth in the contract documents for: Arrow Route and Ninth Street Improvements 4. The name of the original contractor for Lhe work of improvenent as a whole was: Fontana Paving, Incorporated 5. The real Draperty referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and fs described as follows; Ninth Streit between Archibald Avenue and ufneyard Avenue and Arrow Route between Archibald Avenue and Vineyard Avenue CITY 0 K 10 C CAMOYGA, a m c ti on, Owner ~ z1 I at C neer 5'/ . RESOLUTIDN N0. ~ / -S~o A RESOLUTIa1 OF THE CITY CODICIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR ARROW ROUTE AND NINTH STREET IPPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the tonstructt on of puDl it improvements for Arrow Route and Ninth Street Improvenents have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to 6e filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, be tt resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Canpletton wish the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~ ?l~ • ~~ - CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: October 21, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector~,~ SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Canpletian RECONENUATI011: j, The required street improvements for OR 86-08 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recamiended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Coppletion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of (22,000.00. Background/Analysis OR 86-08 - located at 8956 and 8990 Cottage Drive OEYELOPER: Mahlnn n c~~son P.0. 8ok 2090 Upland, CA 91786 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) f22,000.00 Resper lly submitted, RHM:SMG:sd I ~~ RESIX.UTICN N0. ~ 7 J ~ ~ A RESOLUTION OF TIE CITY COLNCIL Of THE CITY aF °JINCNO CUCAMON611, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC II4ROVEMENTS FOR DR 86-08 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF CONPLET[pl FOR TIE MORK MNEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DR 86-08 have been canpleted to the satisfaction of the Cfty Engineer; and MHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is reQuired to be filed, certifying the work caaplete. NOM, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder Of San Bernardino County. • ~i --- CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONCA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 21, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve Gillfl an d, Public Works Inspector~~ SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion ~ RECOMIEi1p1TI0N: U The required street improvements for Tract 12922 have been completed in an acceptable manner and tt is recomaended that City Council accept said f10,o000.00tauthorizet theeCftyiEngf eer to ffleea Notice iof Canple ion and authorize the City Clerk Lo release the Faithful Performance Bonds in the amount of 5100,000.00 and f53,000.00. Background/gnalysis TR 12922 _ Located east of Haven Avenue north of Highland Avenue south of Lemon Avenue DEVELOPER: LB[ Development 123 N. Post Oak Lane, Suite 400 Houston, TX 17024 Accept; Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 510,000.00 Release: Faithful Performance Bonds (Street) f100,000.00 (Storm Drain) f 53,000.00 R es pe ctf ly submitted, i "7 R . (01 RESOLUTION N0. 6~ ? ' ~~ A RESOLUT101 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORIIIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROYEMIENTS FOR TRACT 12922 AND AUTHORIZING THE fiLING OF q NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public Improvements for tract 12922 has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Canpletfon is rewired to be filed, certifying the work campiete. NOW, 7HEREFORE, 6e it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorised to sign and file a Notice of Canpletion with the County Recorder of San Bernardira County. j-, (p2 ,...,. ,. STAFF REPORT ~ ~ ~ .,, ~ = OI 'z p f~ U ~Z DATE: October 15, 1987 ~'~ `' i9r, T0: Mayor and Nea>bers of the City Councii FRDN: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Richard L. Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor SUDJECT: RELEASE OF CASH DEPOSIT r1 U RECOMMENDATION: Mork far the following tracts has been completed and cas~i eposi'tis are hereby recoawended by the Planning Division to be released to: AMOUNT OF TRACT N0. LOT NO. DEPOSIT RECEIPT N0. PUNPOSE 12673 -- f628.00 38394 Subdivision Lewis Homes Identification Sign 11549-1 -- f628.00 Blair Hones 38979 Subdivision Identification Sian Res utiy fitted, ...' Br 1 City tanner BB:RLA:nas fo z r1 u • C[TY OF RANCHO CL'CA~IONGA STAFF REPORT OATS: October 21, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steven Rll en, Jr. Civil Engineer ('7'4:~ SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting at Carnelian Street at Red Hill Country Club Drive and Carnelian Street at Vineyard Avenue Improvenent Protect. RECOMIEIIDIITION: It is recommended that the City Coundl approve plans and spedfications for the "Traffic Signal and Safety fighting at Carnelfan Street and Red Hill Country Club Drive and Carnelian Street and Vineyard Avenue Improvement" protect and approve the attached resolution authorizfng the Cfty Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting 81ds." Background/Analysis The subJect protect plans and specificattom. have Deen completed by Mohle, Grover and Associates, reviewed by staff and approved by the City rnni ..ne. rw, e...., .._.._~. .... .~~ ~...... ~..nu"w ~~i wuau u~~wu is a~w,wu, Legal advertising is scheduled for October 26 and November 2, 1987, with the bid opening at 10:30 am, Thursday, November 19, 1987. Respe tfully submitted, RHM: :sd cc: Purchasing ~`I' r~ U RESOLUTiOY N0. O ~ ~ `--' - A RESOLUTILN OF THE CITY COLfICIL OF THE CITY ff RANCHO LUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "TPAFFIC SIGNAL AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT CARNELIAN STREET AT RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB IXtIVE AND CARNELIAN STREET AT VINEYARD AVENUE", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOM, THEREFORE, BE tT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting at Carnelian Street at Red Hill Country Club Drive and Carnelian Street at Vineyard Avenue". • 8E [T FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as reRuired by late for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said adverti59nent shall De substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the Cf ty of Rancho Cucamonga, San 8ernardirto County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 10:30 o'clock A.M, on the 19th day of November 1987, sealed bids or proposals for the "Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting at Carnelian Street at Red Hill Country Club Drive and Carnelian Street at Vineyard Avenue" in said City. 81ds will 6e opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid far Construction of traffic Signal and Safety Lighting at Carnelian Street at Red Hilt County Club Drive and Carnelian Street at Vineyard Avenue". PREVAILING W1GE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 6S RESOLUTION PAGE 2 LI and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per dten wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per di en wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per di en wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per then wages are an file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to b~e posted at the job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (f25.00) for each taborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done ender the attad~ed contract, Dy him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provision of said Labor Cade. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1771.5 of the Labor Code as amended Dy Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indenture. apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1717.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the f nni ra~f n. n_. _~~---nirlCt ~. MJ Ii1.K1 111111. Section 1771.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program Tn that trade for a certificate of approvai. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, ar 6. Idhan r, he rtunber of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to flue, or • RESOLUTICiV . PAGE 3 C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentf ces on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight ,journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or ,journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributfans. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Irdormation relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements mqy be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its brantln offfces. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a~legal day's wok far all • workmen enpioyed fn the execution of this wntract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed Dy the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours a5 set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code o- the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho C ucanon ga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) far each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontracts under him, upon any of the work herefnbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labur Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable wllective bargaining agreements f11ed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's band, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount e qti at to at least ten percent (10.C) of the amount of said Did as a guarantee Gnat the bidder will enter into Lhe proposed contract if the same is awarded 67 RESOLUTION PAGE 4 • to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract Bald cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall became the property of the City of Rancno Cucamonga. If the City of Randio Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Ran rho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall 6e returned to the lowest bidder. The anount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100X) of the contract price tbereoP, and an additional bond in an anount equal to fifty percent (50X) of the wntract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials a' supplies furnished for the performance of the work wMracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of arty kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries caapernation fnsurance covering his enployees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered irKO between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the corKtruction of said work. No proposal will be COMidered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been issued by the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga. Corrtractar shall possess a Class "A' LScense (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provtsiorn of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time time this contract is awarded. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Ltne Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copt es of the plans and specifications will be furnished upon application to the City of RanUo Cucamonga and payment of 515.00, said f15.00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the p1arK and specifications will be mailed when sa1A request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional rarmetmbursable payment of 515.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful 6ldder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga. 6& RESOIUTIOV PAGE 5 • In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth to the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to he done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's re Guest sad at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to rGlect any and all 61 ds. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this ~_ day of 19_~ PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this _ day of 19_ ayor ATTEST: • ~ Y er bq STAFF REPORT V~ _. GATE: October 21, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager PROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steven Allen, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Haven Avenue at Sixth Street, Haven Avenue at Jersey Boulevard and Base Line Road at Spruce Street Improvement Protect. Recai~enlTia: St is recaenended that City Council approve plans and specifications far the "Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Haven Avenue at Sixth Street, Haven Avenue at Jersey Boulevard and Base Line Road at Spruce Street Improvement Protect and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting BTds." Background/Analysis The subJett project plans and specifications have been tompieted by Mohle, Grover and Associates, reviewed Dy staff and approved by the City Crytraar. iib Enyineer's estimate ror construction is 5234,000.00. Legal advertising is scheduled for October 26 and November 2, 1987 with the bid apenfng at 10:00 a. m., Thursday, November 19, 1987. Respec u submitted, RHM:SA: w Rttachment cc: Purchasing ~0 • RESOLUTION N0. ~ 7 ~~ S A RESOLUTION OF Tiff CITY COLNCIL OF THE CITY ff RANCHO CUGAMONG4 APPROVING PU1N5 AND SPECIFICATIp1S FOR THE "TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT HAVEN AVENUE AT SIXTH STREET, HAVEN AVENUE AT JERSEY BOULEVARD AND BASE LINE ROAD AT SPRUCE STREET IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. WHEREAS, ft is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of.R.ancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOl.YED that the plans and sDCificattons presented specificatronsffor "Traffic~ST~als~and Safety LighttngVet Haven gvenue at Sixth Street, Haven gvenue at Jersey Boulevard and Base Line Road at Spruce Street". directedltoFadvertiuESasYreq fired 6ylawtforlthe rece pL~of sealedribidsaor • proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertiseaent shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: ~~nrrrr r"vnr"r or., ... " ......,. u1G;, u"n ~niw OSAu" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council oP the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this rrotice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 10:00 o'clock A.M. on the 19th day of Novenber 1987, sealed bids or proposals for the "Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Haven Avenue at Sixth Street, Haven Avenue at Jersey Boulevard and Base Line Road at Spruce Street" in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids mutt be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Haven Avenue at Sixth Street, Haven Avenue at Jersey Boulevard and Base Line Road at Spruce Street", ,~ ~l PREVAILIRG WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the • provisions of California Lahor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages Tor holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of Per di en wages. Copies oP such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any tnt eras tad party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a wpy of such determinations to be posted at the ,lob site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as pens alty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five doll are (f25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laboreq workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached wntract, by him or by any subwntractor under him, to violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprentixship Council, property indentured . apprentices may be employed to the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisiorro in Sections 1777.5 and 1717.6 of the labor Code concerning the enploymerh: of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor undar him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the Joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works protect and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade far a certificate of approvai. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to tourneymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to tourneymen in such cases shad not be less than one to five except; A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the toint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds d ra*_io of one to five, or l ~ 7Z C. Mhen the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. Nhen the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered appenti tes on all of his contracts an an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight Journeymen. The CoMrador is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or Journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works sfte are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the anployment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or frpn the Division of Apprenticeship Stmdards and Its branch offices. workmenhenployed in the exec ttonaof this Lcontract andathe Contradar and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the • State of California having to do with working hours a5 set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Ran rho C UC d111n0 Oa tuont v-fIw Mll ~..~ I~ec ~ employed in the execution of the contract a°~il iauurer, worxman, or mechanic him, upon any of the work hereinbefare mentioned for eadyi calCendaradaydurtlng which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours to violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and Subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Lobar Cade Section 1713.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certtf ied check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (lOlk) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the sane is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or band shall he cane the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ~~ 73 If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest • bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (50X) of the contract price for said wa^k shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of airy kind done thereon, and the Contrctor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries ceapensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga far the wnstruction of said work. No proposal will De considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the Provisions of the Contractor's License Lar (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time time this contract is awarded. The work is to be done in acwrdance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of *.he City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Lfne Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications w111 be furnfshed upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of f15.00 said (15.00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, Wp1es of the purrs and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of f15.00 to rover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satfsfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specificatiorrs regarding Lhe work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the ContraMOr may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). • 7'~' • The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. ~ order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this , day of 19_ PASSED AND ADDPTED by the Council of the City of Rarirho Cucamonga, California, this _ day of 19_ ayor ATTEST: Y er' /S r~ L C[TY OF RANCHO CCCANONCA STAFF REPORT GATE: October 21, 1981 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steven Allen, Jr. Civil Engineer ,z, ~- SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the 'Notice Inviting Bids" for the Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting at Haven Avenue and Livtc Center Drive Improvement Protect and authorize the direct purchase of signal poles for the protect from Valmont Industries by the City REODIIEN011TI011: • It is recamnended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for the "Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting at Haven Avenue and Civic Center Drive Ingrovemmt• protect and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Invfting Bids• and authorise the direct purchase, on an e+nergency basis, of signal poles for the protect from Valwnt Industrles by the City. Background/Analysis the subtect prW ect plans and specifications have been camDleted by "ohla, n,uvm m~J nswciaies, reviewed by staff and approved by the Cfty Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for wnstructton is (80,000. Legal advertising is scheduled for October 26 and Novdaber 2, 1981, with the bid opening at 10:00 am, Tuesday, November 10, 1987. ~~ Respe y b tied, T M: d cc: Purchasing 76 RESOLUTION N0. b ~ ~ "' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGl1 APPRDYIN6 PLANS ANO SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND SAFETY LiGNTIN6 AT HAVEN AVENUE AND CIVIC CENTER ORIYE", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. NHEREAS, 1t Ts the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certein improvements 1n the City of Rancho Cucamonga. NHEREAS, the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamon a De and arc hereby approved as the plans and specifications for Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting at Haven Avenue and Civic Center Orive'. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hercDy authorized and directed to advertise as required Dy law for the receipt of sealed bids or • proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertiseamnt shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamon a, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Salo Jtty of Rancho Cucaagnga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk 1n the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 10:00 o'clock A.M. on the 10th day of November 1987, sealed bids or proposals for the 'Trofflc Signal and Safety Lighting at Haven Avenue and Civic Center Drive' 1n sold Ctty. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately 1n the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids oust be made on a forty provided for the purpose, addrossed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Callfarnla, marked, "Did for Construction of Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting at Haven Avenue and Civic Center Orive". PREVAILING MADE: Notice 1s hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Ldbor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 ~~ RESOLUTION PAGE 2 and 2, the Contractor 1s required Lo pay not less than the general prevailing • rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality 1n which the public work Ts perforamd, and not less Lhan the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holld~y and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the. Department of Industrial Relations of the Slate of California is required to and has detenalned such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wyyages arc on file 1n the SuiteeC f RanchoLCUCemongaf ~ ifornla, Ra dhare avallaEle3to eany interested party on request. The Contracting Ageney also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the ,lob site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each caleMar dqy or portion hereof, if such raterof~way~yes herelnbeforehastlpulatediTOr any work done under thi attached contract, by h1^ or by aqy subcontractor under him, in vlolatfon of the provisions of sold Labor Code. as amended by~Chapter 971 Sgtutes affl~tiandlle accordance wbithOtdhe regulations of the California apprentteeship Council, Properly indentured • aDPrentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention 1s dlrecWd to the provisions to Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subconLrectar under Mw. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor emptoytng tradesmen in any apprcnticeable oceupatlon to appiy to Lhe JoSnti apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works protect and which adatnlsters the apprenticeship program 1n that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to Journeymen that will be used in the perfonaance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to Journeymen 1n such cases shad not be Tess than one to five except: A. Nhen unemploytaent in the area of cov~!rage by the Joint apprenticeship coawtttee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, er • la RESOLUTION PAGE 3 • e. Nhen the nua8er of apprentices to training 1n Lhe area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. Mhen the trade can shay that it is repiacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. Mhen the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprcntlces on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight Journeymen. The ContracWr is required t0 cake contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs 1f he employs registered apprcntlces or Journeymen in any apprcnticeable trade on such contracts aM if other Contractors on the public works site arc making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 to the employment of apprcntlces. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Directgr oP Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, Callfornla, or from the Division of Apprentfceshlp Standards and its branCA offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed 1n the execution of this contract and the Contractor a~ any subcontractor under him shall comply witA and be governed by the taws of the State of Callfornla having to do with working hours as set forth 1n Division 2, Part 7. Cheoter 1 . IrNA. a ,.~ •~. i .w._ ~_.. as amended. ~ ~ ~ - "~ ""_ """"' """ "' "'O "Ole of Gaiirorma CucamongaCOtwentyfivehdollarsr(525.00)sfor eacA 1laborer, workman or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbeforc mentioned, for each calendar day during which Bald laborer, workman, or mechanic is requirod or permitted to labor more than eight (B) hours 1n violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees t0 pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required Dy this contract as such travel and subsistence payments arc defined Tn the appllcaDie collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. :~ 7~ RESOLUTION PAGE 4 The bidder Bust surfeit with his proposal cash, cashier's cheek, certified. check, or bidder's bond, payable to the Cfty of Rancho Cucaaonga for an asnunt equal to at Least ten percent (lOf) of the aaaunt of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to h1wt, and 1n event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shah becasN: the property of the CTty of Rancho Cucasbnga. If the City of Rancho Cuceepnga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the aeaunt of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucasnnga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, 1f any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. contracetasquntsaTdtwork shall begonenhu d du percentt(1u00fjeof theMCOntract price thereof, and an additional bond in an aexwnL equal to fifty percent (50f) of the contract price for sauipd work shall be given to secure the payAtent worklcontrected m beudone by the Copntrsetor~iorhany work~orplabor of anyfklnd done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries coapansatlon insurance covering his eegloyees upon work to be done under contract which •AY be entered into between hlwt and the said City of Rancho Cucanonga for the construction of sa10 work. No proposal will be considered fras a Contractor whas a proposal faro has • not been Issued by the City of Rancho Cucanonga. Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (C;eneral Engineering ContracWy Tn accorGnce with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Cal lfnrn la Ru"i nice •..~ erOsL'aa GAa ~wla $R:[len %UUU eL. alQ.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the tine tine tAis contract is awarded. speciflcattonsiof thebClt~ of Reneho Cucaspngaion fttle in tihesOfftce of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucasanga, Cellfornta. Copies of the plans and speciftcattons will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucaaonga and pay~ent of 515.00, sold 515.00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and speciflcatlont will be stalled when said request 1s accoegenled by paywtent stipulated above, together with an additional nonrefafiursable paysient of 515.00 to Lover the cost of nailing charges and overhead. • So RESOLUTION PAGE 5 • The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucaaanga. In accordance with the rcqufre~ents of Section 902 of the Generai Provisions, as ;et forth 1n the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor auty, upon the Contractor's request and at the CoMractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities 1n lieu of aanles withheld (Perfonience retention). The City of Rancho Cucaaanga, California, reserves the right to rc~ect any and all bids. By order of the Council of the C11;y of Rancho Cucaagnga, California. Dated this day of 1g PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the 'City of Rancho Cueaannga, California, this _ day of 19 or . ATTEST: City Clerk --- .. _-~ T• 81 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA STAFF REPORT u DATE: October 21, 1987 TO: Lity Count it ))) FROM; Launen M. Wasse rman ~~~ City Manager SUBJECT: Recommendation re Provision of Professional Services to Citv of Rancho Lucamo naa by Nilliam L. Y.ol lev ~ ~~cn.trgk; yy!l ~9 G~ i \/.. <! Y OI! '• ~~~~ ~ ~ _y z ,,. > 197 RECOMMEND AT ION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the agreement with William L. Holley in order to provide for transitional Services necessary during interim period Until a replacement has been recruited and hired. Our Community Services Director, William L. Holley, has submitted a resigna- tion to the City effective November 14, 1987. As City Council is aware, there are a number of critical projects which are underway, and it would be in the City`s best interest to retain the services of Mr. Holley for a period of time after his resignation in order to make certain that there is proper follow up for a number of significant projects. It is proposed that Mr. Holley be retained far a period of six months in order to work on the following projects: 1. Be available for consultation on pending litigation relating to park tonstruc Lion projects: 2. Identify potential community park sites in the northeast quadrant of the City as specified in the City's General Plan; 3. Begin negotiations for City to purchase the park site which is ultimately identified Dy the City Council; 4, Develop a marketing-financing strategy and alternatives for the development of Central Park; 5, Advise the City Manager or City Council as needed on matters relating to the provision of community leisure services or park development during this interim period; G. udv +=.e the City Manager and City Council as needed on matters relating to the acquisition and deveiopment of the North sown Park. 1. Advise City Manager as needed on matters relating to res sed park credit for detention basins proposed by Lewis Homes within Terra Vista Planned Community. O [~ Q CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Pat Omm Bea COT, pmb Cu"• T, CYifow, 911x1, IT U19C9-1111 October 21, 1987 Nilliam L. Holley 7515 Valley Vista Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Provision of Professional Services to City of Rancho Cucamonga • Dear Mr. Holiey: This letter will constitute an agreement 6y and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and you with respect to the provfsion of professional transition services to the City of Ra nt ho Cucamonga. The services to be provided by you will be as requested by the Cfty Manager subsequent to the date of this ie ice r. ido reove r, speciric pro3 ec is are appena ed Hereto a5 txnlD it "R". Other projects of a si mtlar nature requ irf ng your expert lse shall relate to any and alt matters with which you became familiar during your tenure as Director of Community Se rv 7ces for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. For and in considerstfon of your being available to Drovide the services indicated herein, you will receive the sum of 59,231.25 per month. It is understood that you will 6e providing Lhe services indfca Led in this letter as an independent contractor and not as an employee of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Th 7s agreement shall be effective as of November 17, 19g7 and shall continue fora period of six (6) months thereafter. Moreover, in considers Lion of this co nsul tf ng agreement, and the sum to be paid to you monthly by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, you hereby agree to fully release the City of Rancho Cucamonga, its respective elected ^ffic ials, officers, employees and agents, and each of them, from any Lla lm, demand, dz mages, action or cause of ac icon, whether past, present or fu cure, actual or contingent, known or unknown, for any sum or sums whatsoever and/or any or all attorneys' fees and/or costs related thereto, including any potential workers compensation benefits in any way arising out of or qr, connected with your employment with the City of Rancho Cut am~nga, excepting ~" therefrom such benefits that you have earned and have accrued during your tenure, including vacation leave and sf ck leave. ce..n...w., DeaonE N. B,o.T, lemey xina ~~~ w„y,. D<nnN mSbw CTVIn J, Bw ~/.'~ p '~' Nilliam L. Holley October 21, 1987 Page 4 r 1 U Further in regard with your employment as a consultant, you hereby agree to waive the provisions of California Civil Code Section 1542 which provide, in pertinent part, a3 follows: "A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known 6y him must have materially effected his settlement with the debtor." If the above agrement is aceepta ble~to you, please date and execute the copy of this letter where indicated and then return that coDY of letter to this office for the City's files. Me look forward to a continuous productive association with you witA respect to the rendition of professional transitfan services hereunder. Sincerely, Lauren M. Nasserman City Manager • LMN :baa attachment Dated N1 iam Ho ey I hereby agree with the pray is tons stated above. Dated Mary ey l J Q~ 'Rill iam L. Halley October 21, 1987 Page 4 • EXHIBIT "A" 1. Identify Dotent iat comrunfty Dark Sites to northeast quadrant of City as identified in City's General Plan. 2. Begin negotiations for City purchase of park site as identified Dy City Council. 3. Develop marketing-financing strategy and alternatives for development of Central Park site. 4. Advise Lity Manager or City Council as needed on matters relating to provlst on of coawunity-leisure services or park developrent. • 5. Advise City Manager and City Council as needed on ratters relating to acquisition and development of Ibrth Town Park. 6. Be available for consultation on pending litigation relating to park construction projects. 7. Advise City Manager as needed on matters relating to revised park credit for detention basins proposed by Lewis Homes within Terra Vista Planned Community. ~5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAx~tONGA STAFF REPORT Date: october 21, 1987 '~ To: Mayor and City Council From: Historic Preservntion commission v Hy: Paula Pachon, Adminlatrative AaslatantQ Subject: Recommendation of City Historic Landmark Designation RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Preservation Commission recommends City Historic Landmark designation for the Warren/Thorpe House Socated at 6112 Heilman Avenue, Rancho Cucamongn, California 91701 (ASSessor'• Pareel Number 1062- 781-08). BACKGROUND: As a part o! the City'• Historic Survey the house located at the above referenced address has bean identified • ea being historically and architecturally significant to the City or Rancho Cucamonga. On October 1sL, 1987 an advertised Public Hearing was held to hear testimony and determine the merit of this house !or possible recemeenn.ri.... ^~ ^itp :aoLuric a,anamerx designation. ArchitecturallyVit has been determined that the house is a eingl• story cement block structure of ractengular design. The house is architecturally significant due to its construction o! concrete work in the Queen Anne/Folk Victorian style. As bast ae can be determined, this is the only structure of its kind and material within the City. It should be noted that the use of concrete was not common during this period and appears to be an experimentation with new materials. According to historical records the Warren/Thorpe House was built prior to 1891. The builder, while not substantiated, is believed to be an O.A. Kueten. The house and surrounding 20 acres were purchased in 1895 by Charles F. Thorpe. ,~ g~ Mayor and City Council October 21, 1987 • Page 2 Therefore, based upon both the architectural and historical significance of the house, as outlined aboved, the Historic Preservation Commiaaion respectfully raqueate that City Historic Landmark designation ba granted for the Warren/Thorpe House. P2/Pe cc: Laursn Wasserman, City Manager Bill Holley, Director, Cosmunity Services Department Hlstorie Preurvntion Coaiasion • S/ • ~.u a yr nnivl.nv L V V.i1~1V1VGA MEMORANDUM Date: September 24, 1987 (1 To: Historic Preservation Commission ~ `~ From: Paula Pachon, Administrative Assistant Subject: Additional Information on 6112 Hellman Avenue (Assessors Parcel Number 1062-391-05; As per your request, I have contacted Neale Clark, Senior Plan Checker with the City's Building and Safety Division, to verify whether plans have been approved Por the addition of a second story to the residence at the above referenced address. According to Huildinq and Safety's records there is nothing pending in plan-check for an addition of a second story for this residence. During the course of their research the following permits for alterations on the structure were found: June 18, 1986 - Electrical permit to install 200 AMP service re-wiring 1136 square feet of the structure. Permit Number 86-6733 June 18, 1986 - Addition of 2 porches. Permit Number 86-6734 April 15, 1987 - Re-roofing of the barn. Permit Number 87-5622 May 5, 1987 - Re-wiring of an additional 1,000 square feet of the structure. Permit Number 87-6580 IE you would like any additional information, or if you have any further questions concerning ,this residence, please do not hesitate to contact me at 999-1959. cc: Bi11 Holley, Director community Services Department Neale Clark, Senior Plan Checker Building and Safety Division S~ Luy of IW nc ho Cuccmon ga Applic atlon for HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION • ~_HSSLOr1c Landmark Nlstorla Poipt of Interest IDENTEPICATION 1. Common Name: N/A _ 2. HSSt oric Mng, SL known: Marren/Thorpe House 3. SLreet or Rural Addre ea: 6112 Ilellmen Avenue Clty: Rancho Cucamonga Z10: 91701 County: San Bernardino Asseeacr'a Parcel No. 1062-1e1-06 Zone: Legal Deacrlptlon 9, Prevent Ownet, 11 known: wiilian Bamford Addreaa: 770 Telces ter Rd. C1ly: Elk Grove. IL 21p: 60007 Ownerahlp lm: PuDI1c privet e_~_ d. Prevent Ueei Res_Idence Original Uae: Aesldence Ocher pant ueee: DESCRIPTION 8. Briefly dueriba the pre Gent h a lto] a eanane o[ the alte or rtruc tors and ducriba any mador • test ono nom 1b original rondltlon: • ith it hi l E 1 Roof is hlpoed. endinn in a flat oiettar m, w camms e s ne es, ar Y accounts indla to that structure had a cuoola. this was orobabiv destroyed during a windstorm. Early photograph shows (Continued -- Ner atrarhnrnrl 7. Loc•t ton sketch map (draw k label g. ADD[omlmaH property alze: site and eurrounding et reef s, Lot Slza (Sn feet) raa de, and prominent landmarks): Prom to ge E9 ' - T month ~5 - T NDf: 'I'H or app ma. ac reass 9, condltlon: (check one) a. Excellent_ b. Cood % c. Falr__ d. Deterlorated_ ___.. 3AN'1 ~i1 e. No longer in exlatence 1-1/ `.S uB 7r c1' lf'aei'^r 10, Ia the feature: •, Alte red7_M LJ b. Vnaltered7_ ll, Surroundings: (check more th nn one If necesea ry) 1 a. Jpen land_ I b. Ree/dentltl % 6 I c. 9aaLtered buildings ~ I d. DemelY bu tit-up_ 1 J w :>; n"1 12. Threats to Site: •. None known_ D. Pr lvate davelo pment_ c. ZoninV_ d, Pu611c Norks Project e. Vandalism t. Other % _ . See~T'fSChment 1S. Oates of enclosed photograph(s) July 1987 NOT& The tot lowing ( Items 19-19) are [or structur es only. - 34. Primary exterior building material: a. Stone _ D. Brlek_ c. Stucco d. Adohe e. Vood t. Other % _ SVV'711r1mRNT 15. is the Structure: a. On its orl RSnal e1te7 N 6. Yavedt c. 13. Year of [n 1t L1 Cone ruction: 1890 Thfs Date L: •. Pactusl D. Eat tested % 17. Architect (1f knogn): Unkna+n 19. Sulkier (lt known): 19. Belated Pastures: c. ou[housa , f. Nlndm111 h. Other SIGNI PiCANCE 20. Bristly slats Dlstor teal and/or architectural Smportand (include dat em, events, and Paraooa ueociatsd with the alts when known l: The structure 1s lnportant githin the comsunlty DotA histarlcally and arcAltectualiy, the structure was Duilt prior to 1891, accardln9 to historic records possl Dly Dy an O.A. tuefen; Mlt Ms not Dean substantla tad. ins nnuu aM rb s rmmAlrm 20 arms wn ffnnrimn•d - See attarlwrntl •. Barn b. Carriage house M d, Shad(e) e. Po rural Gar den(~)- g. Mstertowar/tankROUSa 1. None 21. Wln theme of the hletorlc resource: (check only ohs ): a. Archltecturs~ b. Arta - Leleure c, Economic/In duet rl al d. Government e. Exploration/9ettlemsnt 2 t. Mllit ary ' g. flellgios h. Social/Educac tan 22. Sau rces: LL[ books, documents, au rveye, pe nonal Sntsrviews, and that[ dates: San tlerna rd L:o Cnunty Rsse ssor 9eco rds. "ihe Mistorv Of Alta LaM ' 6 Martha 0a Ines Staebe, (Continued - See at achnent) iv. Data tote D[e pa roo Ruanit 21. 1987By (name): Address: AD47 c. VN/(L{J L{t~d0 c1ty: /e ntMaf ztp:9i7{L Phnne: ~7/4~Jr~/•rlrb/ _... .. OrPanlzat ion: • ~~rl ATTACNMEIIT Har[en/Thc [pe Y.cuse • DESCRIPTION (Continued) 6. root cresting; this is no longer present. Windows era double hung, recessed Snto the wall with curved lentel with keystone and extended luspell. Curved woad molding comple tea the window trim. Of signiticanca era the upper liter in the front windows. The clear glass Sa surrounded by "small rectangles of green, red and blue glass. Front door is Eour panel wood, with transom. Hardware on door appears to be original. A veranda extends elonq the front and south walls. Early photos show that this was not continuous, but ended over each window on either aide o[ the doers. This apoeaze to he a modt[Scation; however, is o[ similar workmanship ae original. Thera is a separate ca rrlage barn to rear of property of wood construction and unknown age. , THREATS TO SITE 12. Building was being renovated; ie currently Coz sale. PRI MAAY E%TERIOR BUILDING MATERIAL la. Construction of concretw block In the Queen Anne/Folk victorlen style. SIGNIFICANCE (rootlnued( 20. purcheeed in 1995 by Cha rl ee P. Thorpe. Nle family moved to this house in 1999 end lived [Aare until 1901. Thle le the first pemenent zeaidence o[ the Tharpee plihln calltorn la, alnce they never occupied the Sr hone In Loa Angeles that they bu Slt on westcheatei place in the Heat Adams district. Mr. Thorpe had invested in aeve ral mining companies, In northern Michigan and received income [mm . the rcyaltlea. Ne bull[ en office building on the corner of Fra nklln and Broadway in Lca Angeles in 1906; the bulLd Lng wns named for him. It is architecturally eigni[Scant due to its construction aP concrete block Sn the Oueen Anne/Folk Vletorlan style. This is the only structure o[ its kind and meterlal within the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga. Tha use mt concrete block as a material was not common dozing this period and may represent an expo zlmentatlon with new ma teriele. SOURCES (Continued) 22. "A Field fu ids to American Houaee," Virginia b Lee Mc Alestor 0 ~0 RESOLUTION N0. 87-x~(O • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNI2ZNG THE WARREN/THORPE HOUSE LOCATED AT 6112 HELLMAN AVENUE AS A SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC FEATURE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THEREFORE DESIGNATING ZT AS A CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, has adopted Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal code relating to historic preservation; and WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission has investigated the historic significance of the Warren/Thorpe House and has held public hearings concerning this site in accordance with Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code relatlnq to historic preservation; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City o! Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: The City council !lode and determines that the Warren/Thorpe House located at 6112 Hellman Avenue, has mat the • criteria eatabliehed for designation as a City Historic Landmark, and therefore, and with the recommenflation of the Historic Preservation Commission, designataa this site as a City Historic landmark. .yn;. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PASSED, APPROVED, and Annvmvn this 21et flc, cf OGLu.,ac, Dennis L. Stout, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk x~ V I.1..- l`TTV !1C D A A!l~1111 !`i!l` A lR/lA'/. A STAFF REPORT ~° may. ~~ T Date: October 21, 1987 oil „ To: Mayor and City Council f~ ~7 2 From: Historic Preservation Commission 19~~ v Hy: Paula Pachon, Administrative Assistant Subject: Recommendation of City Historic Landmark Designation RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Preservation Commission recommends City Historic Landmark designation for the Minor House located at 10089 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 (Assessor's Parcel Number 1077-041-57J. BACHGROUNO: A9 a part of the City's ongoing Historic Survey the house located at the above referenced address has been identified as significant to the community of Rancho Cucamonga based upon two specific criteria. Those are: architectural dsaign of the house and its historic/cultural value. On October 1st, 1987 an advertised Public Hearing was held to henr testimony and determine the merit o! this house for possible recommendation of City Historic Landmark designation. Architecturally it hoe been determined that the Minor House is a two story wooden craft q.~.n erg , c hcuaa o: ~eulangular aeslgn. It is an excellent example of a 192o's craftsman style grove house which was once very common in this area. This particular structure is the last remaining craftsman style grove houea in Rancho Cucamonga, and has not been altered. Historically, grove style homes were located on the corner of two intersecting streets with the grove located on the rear portion of the property. Tho Minor House was owned by Charles J. Minor, who was both a citrus grower and possibly the last blacksmith within Cucamonga. He and his brothers, Herbert and Wilbur Minor, were active within the business community. The corrugated iron shed located to the rear of the home was Charles Minor's blacksmith shop prior to the opening of his business in downtown Cucamonga. Therefore, given the above referenced information, the Historic Preservation Commission respactually requests that you grant City Historic Landmark designation for the Minor House. cc: Lauren Wasserman, City Manager Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Department Historic Preservation Commission 92 City o[ Rancho Cucamonga Application for HISTORIC LANDtlAftz DESIGNATION HISTORIC POINT OF INTfiREST DESIGNATION • X Hletorlc Landmark Hletorlc Point of Interest r~ IDENTIPICATION 1. Coeaaos Nua: M1tmr House Z. Hletorlc Name, 1f knaan: N1nor House 3. Street or Rural Addreaa: 10039 Base Line Road i City: Ran ho ~ a!r,nc Zlp: 9vt0 County: can Berner+_f nn Asaeesor's Parcel No. 1077-091-51 Zopa; Legal Oaacrlpt ion: a. present Owear, It known: Adrian A. Xa.:von Addnus 1610 [rcneha,: Rlvd City: Torrance, G Z10: 90501 OaneraDlO Sat Public vn.ae: ~- 5. Preuet Un: Residence Orlglsal Uae: Residence 01Dar Dui uau DESCRIPTION 8. erle fly daac rlba the pralut h olc •1 a earanoa or the alto or mtructurs ted daacrlba as7 sa or • bnt ooa cos ita orlgieal contlltios• A twe stew cwt rrat.~.. .tyt r g g Ikdlom of [ch bi r Ith 1 1 H W rylp f knee Draces. SId1:m A rood 1 pboa d glndows arc wi d Oo 01 h tuod Iln tel, soldln9 and extended slit (Cwtlnwd - See atNarhean[t T. Location sketch map (drag a laDal B. Approxlnb prapartq eln: site and eurrcunding et recce, Lot 91za (in feet) roads, and pros lnut laodmarka ): Prontaga Depth or aDProx. tereazs~g~ 9. Cooditios: (check one) •. 8xcallent b. Cood M C. Falr_ d. Deterlonted_ e. No longer In exietonca_ 10. Ia the teatura: a. Alteredt_ b. UnalteradT M il. Surroundingat (check more than one it naoeeury) a. Open land X D. Residantlal % c. Scattered bulldinga_ d. Densely Duilt-up X n 12. Threats to Site: •. None knowq b. Private d¢ve lopment_~ c. Zon1nE d. PuDl lc Morka Protect e, yandxllam - t. 0[her 13. Dales of eocloeed photograph(s) July 1987 NOTg: TDe tollo+Sng (Ilene 14-19) a re [or structures only. _ 14. Primary exterl0e bull ding material: a. Stone_ b. Brlek~_ c. Sincco~ d. AdoDe_ e. hood % [. Ot Der 15. Ia the 9trvetura: •. On Sta original eite7 % b. YovedT c. Unkno+nt 18. Year of Ivitial Coget ruction: 1922 TDU Oa4 Li •. Pa¢tual b, estimated X 17. A[chitset (it keo+n ): Unknorm 18- Builder (it kno+n): Unknown 19. Related Features: a, Barn X c. Carriage house c. Outbouu d. Shed(e) •. Forul Cardea(a) t. MSndm111 g. tetertane/tankhoume h. Other 1. Nolte S IGNIPtCANC6 20. Briefly alb historical aqd/or •reDltacLUra1 Smportame (include dates, eyentm, and perwo• aaaocla[ed +lth the alto +Dee kgoro): . The structure 1s significant Dotq architecturally and Mitorlcally. This is an excellent exmnple of a 1920's craftsman style grove house, once very [omnon within tM arts: hoe+ver, De<gmin9 lncra+s11g1Y ran Oua to Mvelopment, alihougM1 eaamplef can oe locang wsrnin jCuaxi,ww - - - 21. Ya1g thaaw of tM hlator lc reegurce: (check only oge ): a, Arch ltectu[s 1 b. Arta \ Leleura c, Economic/[odvatrlal 2 d. Government e. EaDloratioq/9ettlemant t. Yll Stary ^. Eell gioe h. Social/Educ at loe 22. 9ourceat Ltat books, documents, surveys, De noaal in brvtev, and the .r dater. San Bernardino County Assessor Records: " A Held Ouide to Mmrican Nausls" D Yir in is 6 [!! (kAlester Conti ued -Sea atteclrnent) 23. Date [o rm peeps red Avw >r Mfl By (name): Addreu: lflA !. OVlurh kuI City: hmar 21p: 9,N.a Ph nn e: 71V~51l ~aaq _- Organ lzat ton: • X13 K} ATTACHHENT H Snor House • DESCRIPTION (Continued) 6, oL craLlnan styling. An uncovered ascend story balcony Ss IoeaNd over the sntrenea, with two uperete door open inq out to lt. Theca doors era plain. A covered porch extends the entire ISngth of the e[ructure. Porch la canenq xlth rock plan end pel tad, aquas woad supports, rock bnluetrad.Front door Ss txo panel with Levr glass panes in the upper third vlth aide xlntlov in living roos consisting o[ a large picture vindow with tM esaller side vintlowe. Foumla Ilan le oC [leidetone. Vnlque Leetun 1e a ports coehore located on the east Bide, Thla may haw had e drlvevay ertmding through St, however, widening oL the zoad hea ruulted In no front yard antl a ~ [oat high retaining veil. A single story utility roes sztenaa otf of the nor of the structure. A corrigated lion born ie T.o tM rear o[ Cha Property and may be the original blackolth. SIGNIFICANCE (Co~tlnued) lo, son Bernardino county. This pert icular attuclun L the last [seining ere ttsmen style grove houw wlthln Rancho Ncasonga, end has not bean altered. 1Tlese structures ran generally located on tM corner o[ tvo inbtaectlnq at nsb with tM grove to CM raer. Thla structure was ovned by chsrlb J. Minor, who was both a clt [ua grower end pose lbly tN lase Dlackulth/rhulvtlght wlthln Cueawngs. Ne end hU breihsn, Herbsit and NS IDur ran all act Sve wlthln the bus loco coaaunlty. The corrugated Sron shad to the nor oL !hL stzucture was Cheiba MSnor4 blecknlth shop prior to hL opening s shop In downtown Cucasonga. • SOVRCE9 (COptlnued) Z2. Penonel SnGrvleV with Ada Cooper, August 25, 1857. f rl. (.t y" RESOLUTION N0. B~reK ~~ _~ • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TfSE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE MINOR HOUSE IACATED AT 10089 BASE LINE ROAD AS A SIGNIPICANT HISTORIC FEATURE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THEREFORE DESIGNATING LT AS A CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, has adopted Chapter 2.26 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Coda relating to historic preservation; and WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation commission has investigated the historic significance of the Minor House and has held public hearings concerning this site in accordance with Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code relating to historic preservation; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE iT RESOLVED by the city Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: Tha City Council finds and determines that the Minor House located at 10089 Base Line Road, has met the criteria established for designation as a City Historic Landmark, and • therefore, and with the recommendation of the Historic Preservation Commission, designates this site as a City Historic Landmark. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of October, 1987. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dennis L. Stout, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk q • CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAbIONGA STAFF REPORT Data: October 21, 1987 To: Mayor and City Council Members From: Historic Preservation Commission ,~ Hy: Paula Pachon, Administrative AssistantQ Subject: Recommendation of City Historic Landmark Designation RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Preservation Co~lsaion recommends City Historic Landmark designation for the Canyon Live Oak Trea (Quartos Chrysolep is) located at 12194 Hasa Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 0227-091-21 and 0227-091-20). i9n BACHGROVND: On August 22, 1987, an application was riled by Robert L. Hickcox, a local resident and noted expert on the history of Etiwanda, with the Community Services Department for consideration of thn Canyon Live Oak Tree located at the above referenced address for possible City Historic Landmark designation. An advertised Public Hearing was held on October 1, 1987 to hear testimony and determine the merit of this item for possible recommendation of City Historic Landmark designation. This Canyon Live Oak Tree has been determined to be located on what is currently vacant land and is in its original condition. The tree is an native oak and is 13 feet 10 inches in circumference at a point 3 Leat above the ground and its spread is 66 teat. H istoricaily, trees of this variety are believed to have grown wild at the base oL the foothills. The origin concerning this particular tree is thought to be that a seed from the foothill area may have washed down the canyon and implanted itself at its present location. <; ~_ ~; ~~ .I 6 ,; ~~a~a~0 ,~ ~~ ~ , 9~ Mayor and City Council • October 2;, 1987 Page 2 This particular tree is believed to be the largest oak tree and perhaps the oldest tree in Rancho Cucamonga. (Hy way of comparison it Ss of similar size to the large Sycamore tree in front o! the Sycamore Zan and is also comparable in size to the Majestic Oak in Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Gardens in Claremont). While the tree would have to ba cored to determine Sts exact age, experts have estimated that this particular tree is over 100 years old. Therefore, based upon the age, size and community/cultural significance of this item the Historic Preservation Commission respectfully requaeta that City Mistoric Landmark designation be granted for the Canyon Live Oak Tree. • cc: Lauren Wasserman, City Manager Hill Holley, Director, Community Services Deoartmwnr Hia*nrln nr._C~ •u ~i~i~ ~.owmiaBlon G7 CITF OF R.1SCH0 CCCatip~;Ga . 1IE 1IORAND UbI i • ;~ DATE: October 1, 1987 T0: FROM: SU&IECT: Paula Pathon, Administrative Assistant Scott Murphy, Associate Planner 7' OAK TREE LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROPD BETdEEN DAY CREEK AND VICTORIA PARK LANE - APN: 227-091-21 With the proposed development of the site identified as Assessor's Parcel Number 227-091-21, concern has been expressed about the submitted by the applicant iindlcatetthat the tree willtbenpreservedPlaIn addition, the applicant has stated that the area under the drip line of the tree will not be Landscaped or irrigated to alter the present amount of water the tree 15 receiving. As part of the approval for the project, staff will be requiring the tree to be preserved as a condition of approval. A15o, staff will coordinate the final landscape plan to ensure the drainage and irrigation within the drip line 15 not altered. During the construction phase oP the project, the oak tree will be enclosed with a chain link fence to protect the tree from possible damage. if vmi chnulA h, ..r-_- -'- any ti ~-~~~~+, yicaac ieei IPCC GO 000LaCL me. Std: to Attachment: Site Plan .. '>~;1. ~- =~~,,. q0 • ~ ;_._- ~y i ~~ _-. , F.- \ ..~ ~ I~ .~~.(_'~ i.. it t~~~ ~~ TL ^I ~_~~~.- ;_ .., --- ~-- ~! _ _ ~ ~ _ ~ -..T _- _. ,i >'^~-~ . _ may' I rJ __ ~~ -. _ L~.~ - ~-__ ~4, .~~~ / ~j~ r //~~\\\\T • ~. ... ~^ _L _ _ _~ •~ _ I _ '~ `: C i - '` ~~ _~ ___ ~° ~ -~ _y-~ i^~i~ •-- --~ _ --- _ ~--- f oun n.n.uM ce.r.. i I~ ^ A \\\VrVViMMM~lll///,///1 I, I ---~ MY.X~fI~ Detailed itr PI3n ~p fl ~ , i ,_`- Ctty of Ra ncnO Cucamonga ApPllcatlon for NI StORIC LANOpARK DESIGNATION HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION ~a H19torlc Landmark H19torlC Point of Interest IDfiNTIFICATION 1. Common Name: Canyon Ilve Oak (Zuercua Chrysolepis) 2. Historic Name, 1f known: 3. Street or Rural Adtlresa: 12194,Beeellna Road City-Rene ho Cucamonga y1p:91730 County•San Berne rd3no Aaee aeor'e Parcel No.0227-091-21 2ppm.3gOB2 0227-091-20 Lept Desc rl ptlon: Lo Ea 21 and 22, Orange Rmpire Acraa 4, present Owner, Lf known:RO toff, Nm. J. Addrees:1 5202 O1 enh311 Dr City: Heclende Nel ghteylp:9174g Own erehlp Sa• publ lc • private •e 5. Preant Use: Vseent Land Or1{lnal Ue•: Ehade for s one roos ca`afin ~- OtMr peat usea• D63CRIPT ION 8. Brie lly deterlbe the Dreaent h alcal a eanme of tna Bite or sLructura aed dwserib• any major a brat oes ram lb on{anal • condition: Tree 1e on resent land In SLS orlglnsl copolLlom, A one room cabin va• built under the Lro many years sgo and hu nor co3 LSped Sn • pSL of lumber. Sho u1Q b• olsan •d up to pr•rent w rs.~: 7. Locatibh sketch map (draw 1 label e. ppproximaLe property size: e lt• and our roundln{ streets, Lot 91ze tin feat) reads, apd prominent landmarks): pr t • 41 L 7_ n- K TOFF ~- .f i~ <i ~ ~- r 7.1 Al 1 7,3 ~~ 4 J ~~f on a{ Depth 1 3{ tLy or approx. acreap tl TO 9. Condition: (cheek on1) a. 6xcellsnt_ b. Good c. Palr_ d. Oeterlorated w e. No )oo{ar 1n exlatence_ 10, la the teatu re: a. Alcend4:_ o. Uoalterad7 13. Surrousdln{e: (check more than Opp !t naCalaa[y) a. Opeo land •~ b. Resident Ll c. 9c at to rsd build Inge a~ d. Densely built-up_ p~4Y I19-0b '' ` . -.L~I~~ .._(..~._ .__--- _. __ _ _._ t'K1 12. Threats [o Slte: a. Nooe known_~ b. Priv¢te developmenc ~! _ c. Zon tnR _~ d. Public Yorks ProlecL___ e. Vandal ism '_~ f. Otner F1__e • 13. Dates o[ eaeimed photoerapn(s) Auvuet 21. 1987 ' NOTe: Tha follosuY (Itame 14-19) are for st run tutee only. le. Primarq axbrlor bull dlnY material: •. BLOne_ b. Brick~~ c. Stueco d. Adobe_ e. Yood I. O[har 15. Is the Structure; •. On ate oriRfnal s1ta7 6. YovedT c. llnknown]_ 1g. Year of In1tL1 Conat ruction= This Date lat a. Pactual~ a. eetlaated 37. ArohiL ect (i1 known): 18. Builder (lt known): 19. Sal ated Peatures: a. Bare b, prriap house c. OutnouN d. Shed(s) e. Po raMl Gsrdeo(aA L Y1oN111 Y. Yatertower/tankhouu h. Other 1. Nons 9[cNIYICANCB 20. Briefly stab 61slor1cal and/or arch ltsctural importance (include dates, aVan q, and Deroon• laaocla[ed Mlth toe alt. Shen known): a teas annce ~Thia nstlys oak tru 1. 13 ft. 10 in. in . ~~~1 ~~ •t • polnL 3 ft. nLnve ground. It. aprsad 1^ 66 tt. Ie proWDll b the largest' oak and o3dut tru In Rancho Cucamonga. IL b coaparobl• u the Matuttn 6.v '- ^.;.o~ u.u c. ana Houma Oardeq. 1500 North Collage avmua, CLreaon t, Gl1t. 91711-3101 23. Yain theme of the hletotic reaouroe: Schack only one): ' A. Archl petu re b. Arts A Leisure c. 8conomfe/IDduatrlal d. Government a. Exploratloa/Bet tlemant~__ f. Y11 Mary Y. Relltloa h• social/8ducat ion ae 22. Sources: L1ct books, documents, surveys, pereomal Ln ptvbws, sad their dates: by Y. YSe for Paterson Rancho Santa Ana Ba tan)c Garden, Na ter Mf furs 23. Date form Drops red A o:• 'e;By !nnmel: ~-~.:. u.~w.~ Addre sa: 79A0 Va lla Vlat~n. City: Cucamonga. Cal if ,2lp: a1TA Phone: 982-039A _,,, Organlzatton: 24. Ns Ut Ths L.rpa 9yesman Tra• 1n front of the 9ycuon Inn Se also 13 ft. 30 Sn. Sn of rcumfaranca, • I ` AUGLST el, 1987 • • 13 fi. ~0 Sn. Sn dlemeter 3 Lt. above Around 7 CAE TPEE 6F ft. epreed 01,E en M en cabin RESOLUTION NO. 87-~ / • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE CANYON LIVE OAE TREE LOCATED AT 12194 BASE LINE ROAD AS A SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC FEATURE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA AND THEREFORE DESIGNATING IT AS A CITY HISTORIC LANDMARE Cucamon a ~~~' the City Council of the City o! Rancho Municipal~COde re atlnq to hi toric preservation undo Cucamonga WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission has investigated the historic signiflcancs of the Canyon Live Oak Tras and has held public hearings concerning this site in accordance with Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code relating `.o historic preservation; and NOW, THEREFORE, HE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: The City Council finds and determines that the Canyon LiVa Oak Tree located at 12194 Bass Line Road, has met the • criteria established for designation as a City Historic Landmark, Prasarvationrcommi eioni designatesot~hisdsitsnas a Ci y Historic Landmark. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTRn thin o,.« .... _ ioei. '- ---- -mot ~~ OGLuLet, AYES: NOES: AHSENT: Dennis L. Stout, Mayor ATTEST: - Beverly A. Authalet, City Clark ~i CITY OF ReVVCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 21, 1987 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director BY: Linda D. Daniels, Senior Redevelopment Analyst SUBJECT: PROPOSED CHANGES TO PUBLIC SAFETY AND CZVIC CENTER FACILITY RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Architect Eor the project to develop construction plans and authorize staff to execute a change order with Berry Construction for proposed changes to the Public Safety and Civic Center facility. BACKGROUND: In September 1987, the City Council awarded the bid for the Civic Center and Public Safety facility project to Berry Construction. Since that award of bid, the Sheriff's Department has reconsidered their focus of operations and feel that it is important to make some • I physical changes in order to increase the efficiency of the facility operations: In addition, since the time that bids for the Project were awarded, the City has hired ad Disaster Preparedness Coordinator. Due to the nnnA ro n_.._ -„ - f~C3.i ve mie rgency upera lions Center, the Coordinator has reviewed the plans and has recommended that minor changes be made. These changes will add to the City's ability to provide information and emergency services to the public during an emergency situation. Because of the amount of money that the changes are expected to cost, it is necessary for the Council tO approve a change order. ANALYSIS: The changes to the Public Safety are outlined as follows: Lower Level Classroom (roam L13) - 1. AdJ a speaker which is connected into the phone paging system and has a volume control switch so that it can be turned on and off. .~ 1977 c~~`Mo ~~ ~ ~~'o $ o" f ~ i u > 1oZ 2. Provide ten one inch conduits leading from a second antennae on the roof of the Public Safety Facility and terminating in the Classroom. Five' of the conduits should terminate in the northeast corner of the room and five should terminate in the northwest corner of the room. All ten should exit at the floor level of the room. 3. Provide a conduit line which would allow for communication between the Revenue Assessment Computer room in the Civic Center facility and the Public Safety Classroom. 4. Provide an adequate conduit to hold ten dedicated phone lines between the classroom and the Conference room (room P22) on the Plaza level which is directly over the Classroom. The conduit should terminate in [he Classroom on the east wall directly south of the storage area. The conduit should terminate in the Conference room on the east wall, approximately at its midpoint. 5. Provide two adequate conduits which can hold five dedicated telephone lines each between the Classroom and Communications Room No. 2. The conduits in the Communication ROOM No. 2 will terminate on the floor. One will be approximately eight feet From the north wall and eight feet from the west wall. The second conduit will be approximately eight feet from the north wall and eight feet from the east wall. The two conduits will terminate in the Classroom on the floor along the east wall directly south of the storage area. 6. Provide cable for a television monitor in the Classroom. This cable will be located on the east wall approximately eight feet south of the door. The cable will lead to the roof where it can be attached to a receiving antennae. 7. Provide for tacks ble wall surface on the west wall of the Classroom. This can be done either by installing a permanent tacY.able wall material, or by applying tackable wall modules to the surface during emergency situations. 8. Provide a power, telephone and computer outlet in the floor of the Classroom. The string of floor outlets are to be approximately twelve feet north of the south wall and midpoint in the room. Antennae - 4. Add a second mast on the roof of the Public Safety facility which antennae can be attached to in emergency situations. The mast should be located on directly above Conference room P22. Conduits leading from this second • • ~0 3 • roof antennae to the classroom, and the two communication rooms must be provided. The conduit leading to the Classroom will terminate in two locations as described in Number 2 above. Kitchen - 10. Relocate the office designated for Inmate (L15) in the Public Safety Facility to the area designated for Laundry (L02). The Inmate area will now be a kitchen to service the Classroom. A door opening will be provided on the west side of the room. Hitchen facilities to include a sink, small built in refrigerator, formica counter top, outlets Eor coffee makers and toaster oven above counter top, a built in microwave oven and storage .cabinets below and above the counter. 11. Provide a mop sink in the Lower Level storage room (L10) of the Public Safety facility. 12. Relocate the Lunch room (P05) and the Lounge (P06) to the Traffic Sargeant (P29), Shift Commander (P28) and Administrative Sargeant (P25) office area. In doing so, all of the plumbing, speakers and other special equipment or designs necessary for the operation of the Lunch room shall be relocated. • 13. The area where the Lunch room (P05) and the Lounge (P06) were will now become two offices. On the west side of the area will be a Lieutenant office of approximately 15' by 15'. The door opening shall be on the west aide of the ..F f: mw.. -,a ~~ -~ - '` "- ,icw alto wiii ue a I'reLf1C Sargeant officerof approximately 15' by 17'. 14. The janitor closet on the Plaza level (P15) must Contain a mop sink. 15. The room labeled Special Investigation (P30) shall be relabeled Crime Prevention. 16. The office space area where the Probation office (P31) and Crime Prevention (P32) now occupy shall now become three offices. Starting on the west side of this area, two separate Citizen Report Rooms, of approximately 9' by 13' each, and one Probation office of approximately 10' by 13'. The door to the most westerly Citizen Report Room will be on the west wall (opening From the corridor). The dcors for the second Citizen Report Room and the Probation office will open from [he north wall (off of the lobby area). civic Center - 17. The meeting room (L on the lower level will now be used to house the offices Eor the Disaster Preparedness .~.~¢ Coordinator and support staff. In order to do this a • private office of approximately 14' 6y 13`~and a private conference room of approximately 11" by 14. The rematnder of this area will be devoted to housing personnel in open oEEice systems furniture, filing and storage and a seating area. In order to accomplish this new walls, power, telephone and computer connections/outlets will have to be located and installed. In reviewing these changes with the Architect, he estimate that the amount of work from his oEEicea, as well as the consultants, will cost between $10,000 and $12,000. In reviewing these changes with Berry Construction, their Project Manager has received preliminary estimates Erom the subcontractors that these changes will add between $40,000 and $47,000 to the cost of the project. aespec~uhmitte - Jack Lam, AICP Community Development Director • ~~ ~~~' ~. ~ ~ NVNeLR OHL GI VIC C[Nl'CR CIgC LC R. o. eoR losD J/.M L9 L. M.[RRM~N BR[A. GLIFORNIh DDOCi•106• •NOq [W V~.\RCZYN SRI R.[LRN O NI.N SON If l~f DDO-OD OI iCl[RNON[ O. Cq..IG FON IZ I]1 ODI-]ell N..R TX/~ JO OCIS LCR /~ ~./ MEMORANDUM TO: Beverly Authelet, City Clerk `'' FROM: Andrea V. Arczynski, Assistant City Attorney DATED: October 12, 1987 RE: substitution of Attorneys Rocco~a Wholesale Corporation, etc., v. MMEH Construction and Engineering and City of Rancho Cucamonga, et al. san Bernardino County Municipal court No. 40746 • Enclosed herewith please find a memorandum for the city Council regarding the above-captioned matter. Please include the memorandum in the Council packet. Additionally, we are enclosing the original Substitution of Attorneys forms for execution by the Mavor on thw w[r.ninn ..~ nct c.[:Cr iioi. ~., Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office at your convenience. AVA: ljl Encl. L\136\AUthelt ~~ ~ ~,~, ~` ` ~ ~~~~ ,A Vfs L. NA nvAv Avo PCw v, +ac zrvsnl PALPN D nA NSON O CR+IG fOA in ARTMA JO GCIS LfR Nuveca ONE avlc ccana aacl.e P. o, e0l ro SD eREA. CI. LIFOaNIA 92e22-103D IJI+~ 990-ODOI iCLEPNON[ ~21]~ 191-JGII MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Dennis L. Stout, Mayor Pro Tem Pamela J. Wright, Council Members Deborah Brown, Charles J. Buquet and Jeffrey zing and Lauren Wasserman, City Manager /,J„7 _ FROM: Andrew V. ATC2ynski, Assistant City Attorney DATED: October 12, 1987 • ~,i RE: Substitution of Attorneys Rocco~a Wholesale Corporation, etc., v. MMbH Construction and Engineering and city of Rancho Cucamonga, et al. San Bernardino County Municipal Court No. 40746 The purpose of this memorandum is to recommend to the City Council that this office be substituted in as attorneys of record for the City in the place and stead of rnJ. t..q+c~ ^_ro::c Thy uuueriyinq litigation arose as a result of an alleged failure to pay a subcontractor by MMGH Construction. PII4bH Construction was retained by the City to construct traffic signal and safety lighting on Baseline Road at Vineyard Avenue in 1987. The action is a Municipal Court action and the funds demanded are relatively nominal. The matter has been dormant for sometime do to the receivership of the bonding company for MM6H Construction. It appears, however, that the matter may again be moving forward. This office has discussed the matter with Mr. Dougherty of Covington & Crowe and it would appear aPPropriate to substitute this office in in place and stead of Covington b Crowe. Accordingly, we recommend that the City Council authorize the Mayor to execute the Substitution of Attorneys and direct this office to enter the case on behalf of the City. We shall, of course, be present at the meeting of October 21, 1987 to discuss the matter with Council should any member of the Council have questions. AVA:ljl L\178\MCC toy v,sr[,ro wols[ss as,nolrrr r[unroxf ao ca cwsr us, oar James L. Markman, Esq. MARRNAN S ARCZYNSRZ 1 Civic Center Circle, 4th Floor Brea, California 92621 ,na..r tae Defendant, City of Rancho Cucamonga SUPt]ROR COURT OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF SAN BEANARDIN0 ^ c.ny o.... Sl vvw a.v ^ o.... ou.n sal e.w,.o.~r,w.. .rre.+r.rrer toss c.~o... s.~a.~.e~w.u sa,is v:..,rv.u s:m 8303 Haven Ave., Rancho Cucamonga, CA e.wnnsxrm.iorae ROCCO'S WHOLESALE CORPORATION, etc., wrw.+rnnearnlu«r M. M. AND H CONSTRUCTION AND ENGINEERING, etc., et al. c,u rare: SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY 40746 ^ Plaintiff ~$ Oefsndant X8 Crow-Complainant ^ Cron-Defendmt U Pe[itionsr ^ Respondent • CITY OF RANCH~UCAMONGA he•eby substitutes JAMES L. RiCMAN OF M,Fi[ij(j~N 6 ARCZYNSRI leddreaal on iv+ en r Cir.Cle. 4th Floor. Hrna r•a onaot (phone numbed 17141 990-0901 as attorneylal 01 record in place and stead of ROBERT E- DOUGNERTY OF COVINGTON fi CROWE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dated: Octc bez , 1987 BY: ~~ ar-rsrfun aI grry '~ 1 consent to the strove substitution. COVINGTO[~ 6 CROWE, Dated: Oc <ober~ 1987 -BYT://~~ ~~/~ Iutl'vrRGJrnr orney Robert E. Dougherty Above substitution accepted, MAR&NAN ARCZYNSRI, ~ ~~ pared: October~^ , 1987 BY: , .~ Mora ~- Srpnarun e/ rWA/ram-. _~ James L. Markman Notice must be carved puraumr ro Sec. 1B5 C.C.P. ISn Navsru SAS ra Prwl of SsrvKel Acls cad. suesTrruTfa+ OP AtroRNEr 3600410Y1 .,..,,,..,.. „~ 108 u - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~'G'MO'~ STAFF REPORT ~.~ ,. o r 0 F $ Z DATE: October 7, 1987 ~ i 1977 To: city 'Council and CSty Manager FROM: Earen McGuire-Ems n ry, Associate Park Planner ~ II~.~ SUBJECT: Acceptance of the Victoria Groves Park Project in the Victoria Planned Community ~: That the Clty Council accept es complete the victoria Grove• Park Project and euthoria• the Director of Coluunlty Services to Lils a Notice of Completion. : The Victoria 6rovae Perk Project has bean completed to the eatiefaction of the Director of the community services Department. Zt !s therefore recommended that the City Council accept the project from the William Lyon Company as complete and direct the Director of Community Services to file a Notlca of Completion !oz the work. KME/bcs f 'y ~p ~ /'Q • ,~ -- CITY OF RANCHU CCCA~IONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 12, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Joan Kruse, Administrative Analyst BY: Wendy A. Miapagel, Purchasing Aasiat ant 3CBJECT: Purchn_„ of a crack sealing machine. RFCOlQ~DATI03: It is recommended that the City Council accept bid as submitted and award the contract the Crack Sealer to the lowest responsible bidder, BearCat Mfg., Inc. in the amount of $24,613.20. Background/Analysis Per previous Council action, bide were solicited, received and opened on October 6, 1987. Staff hsa reviewed the one bid received and find it to be complete, in accordance with the specifications and considerably lower than the $39,000 budgeted for the purchase of this item. BearCat Mfg., Inc. submitted the bid in the amount of $24.673.20. Respectfully submitted, ~~w JAK:WA .~L.~ • CITY OF RABCHO CU.NpS6A AD)QEI9PRATIVH 3BRVICEH DEPAH9B3f 9320 Bi1HELLE AOND, SDITE C AAtCHO COCAIEAGA, CA 91701 BIDE IgSP ffi AECR7ID BY 10:00 A.M. ABD iRLL BE OPEEED AT TEAT TDEE OE ocmBmt 6, 1987 CITY COUECZL CSTY OP RAECHO CfBJIlWId RABCHO CWIIOEGA, CALIPOffiIA 91730 HOlORABLE CCUECIL: I1 ACCOADAECE fII'B3 TBE EBPAffiS81pID BPECIFICATIOEB, THE IEHEfltBICEID BIDDER AOR® TO PROVIDE THE CITY Ol RAECHO COCAl10EnA Y298 OEE (1) CRAM 9EALIIl AT Tffi POLLOYII6 PRICE, IECL[ElItli 8A1~ TAE. BID PRICE TC ffi EECLUHIVE OP FEDERAL EZCIffi TAZ. One (1) enc6 crack sealer = 23.220.OG • Does not include Calif. Salen Tax. Bear(at Mf4.. Irc. COlRAEY P.O. Box 2059 ADDRE98 Wicxkenbur/9. Arizona 85358 J/'-"~f BY: E7ed Atder9on, General Manager CI • - CITI' OF R.~NCHO C'l'CANO1vGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 12, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Joan Kruse, Administrative Analyst BY: Wendy Miepagel, Purchasing Assistant SGBJECT: Purchase of Stencil Truck i It ie recommended that City Council accept all bldg ee submitted and axard the contract for a Stencil Truck to Bauer Coatings Division oY Whittaker Corporation, in the amount of $37,684.46 Background/Analysis Per previous Council action, bide were solicited, received and opened on October 6, 1987 for the stencil truck. Staff has reviexed all bide and found that Bauer Coatings Se the apparent lox bidder with their bid of $37,684.46. Reepectfully Submitted, 7. w~., w . ,T -----._ JAK:WA ~.. 2 • CITY OF RANCHO CUOAMOHOA AHMINISTAIITIY3 SffiiVICaB DSFAR1fDN:F 9320 BABaISNN AOAD, 3UITS C RANCHO CUCAMONIIA, CA 91701 BIDS MUST Ha R%CSIVBD BY 10:15 A.M. AaD DILL HB OPT AT TRAT TIlD; Oa OCTOBNR 6, 1987 CITY COUNCIL CITY OF RANCHO CUGlIONOA RANCHO CUCAMOaCCUII, CALlP'OANIA 91730 eoaoRABrs CooaclL: v accoRBANCa xlTe Tea ~.ISeaa sFacIFICATIONe, THa u~aess® ernnm+ acRaes To FROFina Tea crrY of eAaceo cu:AaoNmt MITa oNa (I) sTncm TAOCa AT Ta FOLiQIIIIIi muca, ncumna sALNH TAx. BID FHICa TD Ba mtcLHHlva of F~IHIAL EYCIHa TAI. • One (1) each stencil truck a 37,684.46 BAUER COATINGS DIVISION COMPAaY 1C21 NORTH MISSION ROAD ADDRNSS LOS ANGELES, CA 90033 BY: DOUGLAS A. RUSSELL 9.13 - CITY OF R,LNCHO Cl.'CASiONG.1 STAFF REPORT DATE: October 21, 1987 T0: .City Council and Cfty Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval to Annex DR 86-14 and OR 86-36 (Industrial/Cammerci al) to Landscape Maf nten once District No. 3 as Annexation No. 8 and setting the date of public hearing for Novenber 18, 1987 rtEDOf~earto>t • It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 8 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described protects to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3. Rnalysis/Background Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex DR 86-14 and DR 86-36 (Industrial/Commercial) to Landscape Maintenance District Nn. 3 fnr annava_~~,.., x,, o ... - puolic hearing date for Novenber 18, 1987. Also attached for~Councfl consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the sub,(ect annexation. Letters fran the developers reguesting the subJect annexation are on file in the Engineering Division. Respectful) ubmitted, RMM: Attachments 11y- • RESOLUTION N0. ~ ~ -`j ?J A RESOLUTIOY Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY aF RANCHO CUGIMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 0° PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY EnGINEER:S REPORT FOR ANNE%ATION N0. 8 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 WHEREAS, on October 21, 1987, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1912; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said Ciiy a report in writing as Called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consfderation; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that safd report, nor arty part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLYEO by the City Council of the City of . Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTIQi 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o~"~3 work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and des cr a in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within Said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3; That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sai ssessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, fran safd work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report forte purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district, -I~+J' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 ANNEXATION h0. 8 For OR 86-14 and DR 66-36 SECTION 1. Authority for Report TMs report is in compliance with the requiranents of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Landscape Maintenance District No. 3. The City Council has determined the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all the developments as mentioned above. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed developments are shown an the recorded Map as roadway right-of-way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. . SECTION 3. Plans and Specificattorn The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plane and specifications for landscaped nmprgvemenc on Lin: inuiridodl da:alo~,~cr; !t hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be Incurred by the District for parkway and median improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers and gr/by the City. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed wcrk standards, it is es tfmated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will eRual thirty (5.30) cents per sguare foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cast data. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 has been demarcated Soto two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of Parcel Map 7349, comprised of 8 parcels, totaling 6,057 square feet. The district was formed in Octgher 5, 1983, for the maintenance of landscaping a detentfgn basin and storm drain within the project. Tnis zone will be assessed on per lot basis for the maintenance costs within the project boundary only as stipulated in the Engineer's Report for the formation of the Oistri ct. 11 G, Zone 2 is comprised of all other pro3ects that are being annexed or will be annexed to this District. All lots or parcels within Zone 2 will be assessed on net acre basis for the maintenance of landscaped median islands on Haven Avenue from 4th Street to Deer Creek Channel, Foothill Boulevard and 4th Street from west to east City limit, Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue, fran 4th Street~.to Foothill Boulevard, 6th Street Fran Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue and median islands on other ma3or divided highways and sane parkways within the Industrial Spec if it Plan Area and Foothill Boulevard overlay area. The estimated cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 including Annexation No. 8 is as follows. Zone 1 Total estimated maintenance cost Assessment units Total cost - assessment unit for year and month Zone 2 Total estimated annual maintenance area - Sq. Ft. Assessment units, acres Existing oastri ct f2,070 8 f2~70 5258.75/year or 521.56/mo. Existing Annexation District No. 8 0 0 380,516.18 1,75 N eW Total 0 380,517.93 Total cast ~ assessment unit for year and month ~0, x~f.30 - f 0 /year 0 /mo. Assessment shall apply to each lot as enunerated fn Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A", by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the Cext of this report. • • z .~..7 • SECTIQi 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel for Zone 1 and shall be equal to the next acreage for each lot or parcel in Zone 2. , The City Councfl will hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the previous fiscal year which are to De recovered throu~ assessments as required by the Landscape and Lightfng pct of 1972. SECTIDV 7. order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of Cfty Engineer's Report. 2, City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annez to District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Counc+l wnducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4, Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. • 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and aDDroves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. ~~ 3 ~~ Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 8 (Zone 2) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3: PROPERTIES PROJ~EC[4 gCRr E~gDE DR 86-36 .75 1.75 IMPROVEMENT AREAS TO BE ANNEXED IN ANNEXATIRI No. 1 Area Sg~Ft• Haven Avenue 0 Foothill Boulevard 0 Milliken Avenue 0 4th Street • 0 Rochester Avenue 0 6th Street 0 C~ " 11,9 • ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0, 3 ANNEXATION N0.9 ~wwew waur~ I I ~'~~~`; CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,~IOIVGA fr~~~_ _; Z EtiC;INEERI:YG DIVISION =J~n VICINITY bSAP N ,.~ _ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 ANNEXATION N0.8 • i~c u~ ~.~~%"~'" CITY OF RA(VCF{O CUCA,~I( ~ ; si -Z:yC~:~``r t; ; ENGINEERING DIVISION ,z '-+ 6 VICINITY MAP inn N RESOLl1TI01 N0. ~') - 5" 7 l A RESOLlJTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ff RANCHO CUCAMbNGA, CALIfORiIIA DECLARING ITS INTENTIpN TO OROER THE ANNE-%ATIOH TO LANDSCAPE MOINTENANCE OISTRICf N0. 3; AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNE%ATiQI AS ANNEIiATION N0. 8 TO LANDSCAPE N4INTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3; PULSlD1NT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND "'ACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESDLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provi siore of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Hi~ways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descri lion of Work: That the public interest and conveniencece require ana' fE'-i~fen~Ton of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those parkways and faciliites thereon dedicated for cannon greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision trail map within the boundaries oP the proposed maintenance distrld described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cast and supervision of any sprinkler system, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornanental . lighting, structures, and walls in connection with said parkways. SECTION 2. Location of Wark: The foregoing described work is to be located wTtFin roadway r - -way and landscaping easements of Lmdscape Maintenance mctri rt wn 7 "niwe..reA <. t": °pcrv df U;a City Enyiueer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 8 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3". SELTICiV 3. Oesai Lion of Assessment District: That the contenplate wor , n the op man sa ty ounc s more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeabie upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 9 to Landscape Maintenance Otstrict No. 3" heretofore approved by the Ctty Coundl of said City by Resolution No. +, indfcating by said boundary ifnes the extent of the territory included within the proposed assessment district and which map 1s on file in the office of the City Clerk df said Ct~y. 122 RESOLUTION PAGE 2 • SECTICN 4. Re rt of En inner: The City Louncil of said City by Resolution No-"'+Tras approve a repo of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Annexation No. 8, Landscape Maintenance District No. 3` is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City, Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the war k. SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shalt be col lean a t e sane me an n same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Louncit will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will De determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearin Notice is hereby given that on Novenber~B,-'T987, a +e our o pN n the City Council Chanbers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and ail persons having any obiectiome to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried aut or why said district should not be fonaed in accordance with this Resolution oP !Mention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof 15 interested, sufficient to identify the sane, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other Drotests or ob~ectiorK will be considered. If the signer of any protest is cat shown upon the last equalized assessment roil of San Bernardino CourKy as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that curh c+.~w..r L^ the c,:ra o. Lia: property so described. SECTION 7, Landsc~a ing and Li t~_in~~A~ct of 1972: All the work herein propos~ e3 shall be done an~~d thug n pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Otvlsion 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTICN 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be ma pursuan a ec on a overnmen Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the sane to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Oail Re rt, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of n err o, a ornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 1~ - C(TI' OF RANCHO CL'CAbIONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: October 21, 1987 T0: 'City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steven Allen, Jr. Civil Engineer i~ r' SUBJECT: Set Public Hearing far Rovember 4, 1987, for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Six Locations Enviromiental Assessment Review located at Haven Avenue at Civic Center Drive, Haven Avenue at 6th Street, Naven Avenue at Jersey Boulevard, Base Line Road at Spruce, Carnelian Street at Red Hill Country Club Drive 'and Carnelian Street at Vineyard Avenue REDDMERpg7I011: • It is recommended that the City Council aDPrave the attached Resolution for the scheduling of a Pu61ic Hearing an the City Council's Agenda of November 4, 1987, for, the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Siz Locations. Such action is pursuant to the California Envirom!ental Quality qct (CEQA). Background/gnalysfs The Engineering Staff is reQuesting a Public Hearing date for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lightfng at Six Locations Environmental Assessment Review in order to coMorm to the CE¢A requirements and in order to render an enviromiental evaluation of the City's proposed traffic Signals and Safety Ltghti ng at Six Locations prof ect. *a~ Respec 1 submitted, RHM: Attachments 1.I~4- • RESOLUTION N0. O ~ "~ 7 ~" A RESOLUTION OF THE LITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ff RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING GATE OF WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1987 FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGIiALS AT SI% LOfATICNS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW, LOCATED AT HIIYEN AVENUE AT CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, HAVEN AVENUE AT 6TH STREET, HAVEN AVENUE AT JERSEY BOULEVARD, BASE LINE ROAD AT SPRUCE AVENUE, CARNELIAN STREET AT REO HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND CARNELIAN STREET AT VINEYARD AVENUE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has directed the CTty's Engineering Staff and Mole, Grover and Associates, Inc. to proceed with formal designs for the proposed traffic signals; and WHEREAS, said design for the traffic sf9nals requires an Environmental Assessment; and WHEREAS, an Enviromental Assessment has been prepared pursuant to Lhe California Fnvirormental Quality Act, as encoded. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: . Section is The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves-an~seEs a Public Hearing of Wednesday, Novmber 4, 1987, at 7:30 p. m. to be held at Lions Park Canmunity Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California for the Traffic Signals at Siz Locations Environmental Assessment Review; and Section 2: The City,Clerk is directed to submit the attached City of Rancho ucamonga nvirormentai Assessment Notice for advertisement prior to said Public Hearing date Wrsuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements. 1~y • LITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDfifA ENVIRLNMENTAL ASSESSMENT NOTICE Complete environmental assessments have been prepared for the following protect(s)). The City Council wiii be considering these assessments, staff's recommendation, and public input, at their meeting of October 21, 1987 prior to making a final environmental determination. Following is a brief description and location of the protect(s)) and staff's recommendation on the protect(s)) to De considered. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTINB AT SIX LOCATIONS PROJECT - CITY OF RANCHO CUfAMON6+1- The protect tocattens are at Naven Avenue and Civic Center Drive, Haven Avenue at 6th Street, Naven gvenue at Jersey Boulevard, Baseline Road at Spruce Street, Carnelian Street at Red H111 Club Drive and Carnelien Street at Vineyard Avenue. The proposed improvements consist of the installation of traffic signals and safety lighting. STAFF RECOMMENOr1TICi1: It is recommended that City Council approve the Envlrommentai Assessment and issuance of a Negative Declaration for the proposed Traffic Sfgnals and Safety • Lighting at Six Locations Protect. A coq of the Environmental Assessment can be reviewed at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division office located at 9320 Base Line Road, Suite "B", Rancho Cucamonga, California. Nri tten tomuents should be addressed to the Engineering Division, City of Rancho Cucamonga, P.O. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga. California ai nn ..hcncd (;,;) ;g;_ioo2, in aaam on, concerns can be addressed to the City Council publicly at the meeting time previously mentioned. The meeting will begin at 7:30 p. m. and shall take place at Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Ltne Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. PUBLISH: October 21, 1987 Taro ORDINANCB N0. 3Ti AN ORDINANCE 08 THE QT! OOUNCIL OP THE QTY OP RANCRO COGiDNGA, GILIFORNIA, APPROPIt2. DwBLOPNE1Pf DISTRIQ AMENDMENT NO. 87-09, A RiQUPBT ltl AlOSND THE DwBLOPifENT DISTRICT MAP FRON 11iE Ei15TING ^GC^ (GHNERAL ~IOERQAL), ^OP" (OFPIe/PROFESSIONAL), "N" (MEDIUM DHNSITY RESIDHNTIAL), ^PC^ (YLOOD CONTROL), "28P" (INDUSTRIAL AREA SPEQFIC PLAN), AND "ESP" (tT1HANDA SPEQPIC PLAN ANBNDloSNT) TO ^PSP" (l001EILL HOULwARD SPEQPIC PLAN) FOR 560 AQtE3 OP LAND (SEE BEIIIDIT ^A") ADTA(ENT TO POOTAILL BOOLwARD 8EINEEN GRWE AFENU6 AND DEER CE6E< CHANNR. ANp BETNH®I THE I-IS PRER)A! AND EAST AFHNOE WITHIN 186 FOOTHILL BWLWAED SPEQPIC PLAN The City 4wci1 of eh• Ciq of Rancho Cacsaoaga, don ordain as follwas SECTION 1: Th• Ciq Council hereby finds and 4teaiaaa the folloringi • A. 'mat the Plu¢iag Coraiasion of the Qt7 oC Rancho GVcuoaga, folloring a public boring bald i¢ the tiu and eamar prucribad by lr, racoaae¢da eha rro¢i¢g of tt,• property heraiwf ur deacrihad, and thin Cit7 Conch hu 6ald a public boring i¢ the tine and ~anwr ptucribed by it and duly hard and comiMred said recoswadatioe, B. that thin rao¢iag is conaiauat ritb tb• Geural Pisa of the City of Ranebo Cuca~oaga. C. That this raso¢ing is conaiste¢t rit6 eh• objectives of the Developaat 4M of the City of Rsacbo Gucuo¢ga. D. 'mst this rroaiag hu bsaa rsvirad a¢d coasiGrsd in conpl ieaca rit6 the 411foraia Bmirouutal Quliq Mt of 1970 hY eh• careif !cation of the Poot6111 Boulevard SpaciHc Plu and General Plea Aaudaut 81-03B Enviromutal Iapact Report a certif isd o¢ Septrbsr 16, 1987. SBCTION 2: The folloring described rani property L hereby rea o¢ed in the manner sEeted, and the dwalop~ut district sap i• hereby sae¢ded u i¢diceted is Pah iblt ^A^i :~ 1~- / Ordiunce No. 323 Pege 2 TRB DHyBLOPNSNT DISTRICT MAP SHALL BH ANHNDSD PRON TRB EEISTIM, "GC^ (CffiiHRAl, m1DBRC[AL), ^OP" (OPPICS/ PROPffiSIONAL), "M^ (IRDIllN DHNSITy RffiIDHNTIAL), ^PC^ (FLOOD CONTROL), ^ISP" (INDI)STRIAL ARHA SPHCIPIC PLAN), AND "ffiP" (STII7ANDA SPHCCPIC PLAN AMENDNRIT) TO "PSP" (P001RILL 800LEPARD SPHCIPIC PLAN) POA 560 ACRffi OP LAND AAlAC6NT lb POOTRILL BOOLS9ARD 881NEA1 GROPE AVHND6 AND DHER OtHHH CBANNR, Alm B61{1®i THE I-I3 PRERiAT Alm EAST AOENOE WITRIN THE PDOTiIILL BOilLByARD SPBGTPiC PLAN SECTION 3. The Neyor shall sign thin Ordioaaca and th• City Clerk shall caue the seas to M pnbl iahad rith la tiftHn (1S) days afdr its paauge at lent once is The Daily Report, • mapaper of gaaaral circulation pubs iahad in the C[ty of Ontario, Oeliforaia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucuonga, California. PA93ED, APPRW®. sad ADOPT'8D this +bt day of +eeeeae, 19Ha. ASES: + NOffi: ABSRPf: + llemia L. Stout, Mlyoz ATTEST: Beverly A. Auchelet, City Clark I, BHOERL7 A. AUTRII,BT, CITY CLERE of the City of Rancho Cuauwga, hlifornia, do hereby certify that the foragoiag grdioaaca ree introduced e! a regal ar seating of the Cowcil o! the City of Rucho Cucaonga held on the 7th day of October, 1937, and vu finally pawed •t a regal ar meeting of the City Comcil of the City of Rucho Cucaaonga Geld on the ++at dey of +++++++, 193*. • • 1 ~$ i ORDINANCE N0. 309-A AN ORDINANCE OY TAE CITT ODONCTL OP THE CITT OP RANWO COCAibNGA, CALIFORNIA. Ale{NDIM, TITLH 14 OY TA8 RAN~lO WCAlDN7A IUMCIPAL O1D6 PERTAINING TO SIGNS • The City Co:mcil of th• City of Rancho Cucaoaga dou ordain as fol lws: SHCTION 1: Section 14.20.065, of mapter 14.20, of T~tl• 14, of the Rancho Cucaaenga Nmicipa Code i~ hereby repealed and re-euetad to road, in vorda and figure, as follova: riffiia nay plamed coami ~~ We ,.oprraz7 argon °n ~ Mrsitted 17.16.020, nub tot to the ~' rhiM ru tatabl iehed pursuut to Seceioe 7 prov Lions lisead: A. The dwaopez of • planned cosmity aha11 ^ubait a sign pregra foe Lading euataers to the site rithin the pl asnad comity to the Plamiog CaeeLaion for twist and approval. Said progra Mail include the detail sd deaigo and placaut of tech sign •tructura. Signs shall M located rithia t6• bomdarin of the Pl caned Cwamity, ezcapt wid sigoa Mal not be located on periaster atrpn eo the Flawed Coaamity. a, signs anal M Do larger the aia:ty inches (60") by taD inehu (10") sad a6a1 h grouped on • fora-aiMd aigo structure as shorn iD Eshibit "A". Th• top huMr bard shall identify the plaDaad toasmlty. Further, each sign nay only contaiD the Due of ffi• .ubdiviaion, aDd a directional arrov u Mwn on 8rhibit "A", euept as othetriu provided for 6ersin. C. SLgDa placed on private property ehal M done rich rritten consent of Lh• property caner and tiled rlth th• Departaent of Cema:mity Dwslopsent prior to issuance of pewit. Signs iD the public right-of-ray ehal M twisted and approved by the Ciq EDginnr prior to issuaDte of the sign permit. ~. lhaee shell be ao additions, tag •igna, stream, dwicee, diapl ay boards, or appuetenaacaa adGd to th• sign as original ly approved, Further, no other diractioul sigeiag uy be wed •uch u pestsn, sandrich signs, oz ttail er signs. ~ ae Ordinance No. 309-A Page 2 E. All non-coafor~iag subdivision directional ^igna auociated rith the subdiviaiw in question aunt be rswed prior to the iuuaace of a ner siµ patfit. P. A fivrhnadred dollar cub deposit shall W placed rith the City to we:se coapl ranee ritk ehia title. Ay siµ pi ated contrary to the prov !lions of thin title a7 be r~wad 67 the City and the <ost of r~wal shall be deducted frog the Mpoaii. Addi[iowl coats incurred b7 the City ruin tang frog the removal of illeµl aiµe shall b• charged to the dwel oiler. G. the siµ shall be allorad Weil aubdivfaioa is sold , out or, in the case of loving office, mtil 90 pnnas of tb4 uniH have been awed or rented. N. lfiie sutiw well not M conetrwd a co prohibit the dwelopers rithia ^ ill anaed coarmity frog participating in the off-cite enbdivisioa siµ program lapl~wted and iartalle4 ttisough the Building Indutrial Aaaociarion (DIA). • I. Siµa u) also ba wed to lud people co non-coraereial coonaity facil !ties, ouch u parW and public athoola. 36CTION 2t ibis CLOP Cowcil harebv finA. ..w --- L'ua~ cIIe proj etc nu haw rwL:rad in cwDl !sacs rith the Cal lfornia,~6mironuntal Qwlity Act of 1970 and herelq concurs rich the Neµtlva Declaration posted rit6 respect to the project. SECTION 3: the Nyor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cewe the sue to be prbl !shed rithin tiftnn (15) dye after its paauµ at lent once in The Daily Eevors. s oarapaper o[ general einulation publ !shed io the City of Ontario, OalltoreL, wd circulated in the City of Raacbo Cucuonga, Cal iforoia. PASSBD, APPROPgD, wd ADOPTED thin •bt dy of *•••*••, 198*. AYES: NGES: ABSffiiT: r 1 L J Daoaie L. SCOYY, Nyor 13p ORDINANCE N0. 324 AN ORDINANCE OP 17IE QTY ODDNCIL OP TNB QTY OP RAN~O O7CAl0}CA, CALI80RNIA, A!ffiNDIllr SECTZON 10.20.020 OB THE RANa10 WCAMONGA MONICI PAL AIDE RHGARDINO PRIMA PACIH SPHSD LIMITS UPON OERRTAIN CITY STRHEIS A. Recitda (i) Cal iforaia Peh icle ¢ode Section 22357 provides that thin City Couacil say, by ordiuace, sat prise facia speed limits upon say porcine of anq street not a scan higbry. (ii) Th• City Traffic 6nginees hu conduced an engiuaring and traffic curvy, of certain struts rithin th• City of Rancho Cucasoaga rhich stream a spaeified in Part B of thA Ordiunn. (iii) The deteaiutiwa coacernin6 prise facia silted liaiu rat forth in Part H, Mlw, ate Mud upon the angiuaring ud traffic navy identified in Section A (iil, above. • 8. OrdinuC• NW. THEREFORE, TR6 CIT4 COONGit OP TH6 QTY OP RAN~O WC41DlGA ROBS HERBY ORDAIN AS POLLONS: Section 1 uacttaa 10.20.020 6araby i• astndtd to the Rancho Cueuonga Ciry Code to red, in cords and figure a follwa: 10.20.020 Dteztua of ^tau lac sasis:a uud. It is deursiaad by Ciry Council Ruol utioa sad upon the Meis of w engineering and traffic irtvaRigatiw that the speed persittad h9 state la if grater [hu i• ruaombl• or ofe under ffie condielona found to aziat upon such streKS, apd it i• decl aced that the prise facie ^paed licit shall M u pt forth in thin section on thou etreap or pare of •treeu drsigoated in ehit uctioa rhen signs ere eracUd giving notice thereof: Declared Priaa Facie Name of Strut or Portion AffscUd Swtd LLit (MPH) 1. Archibald AvenW - Pourm Street to 45 Banyan Strtec 2. Arrw Route -Baker to Hare 45 3. Haven Avenue - Highiand io Gilson 50 4. Hellasn Avtnw - Pooth ill to Alta Lwa Dr. 3s ~~ Ordinance No. 324 Page 2 r~ Declared Prima Pacie Name of Staat or Portion AffecUd Speed Licit (MPH) 5. Hellun Avenw - 6th to Foothill 45 6. Hellun Avenw - 500' norffi of MansuiU 40 to Vallq Vis 7. Beryl Street - 800' norffi of Lmon 40 to aanyaa H. Beryl Street - Bevyaa to end p5 9. Base Liaa Rwd - Wut citq licit 45 to Grneliu 30. Bua Line Raad - GrnQiu to Haven 40 11. Gtnal ian Strut - Pooffiill to end 45 12. Rigbffi Strut - Grwa to Haven 65 13. Sti~enda Avenw - Pooffiill to Highland 45 14. Nigblud Avenw - Ameffiyat to Archibald 35 IS. Grwa Avuw - 61shffi to Pooffiill 4p 16. Turner Avuw - 61gbffi to Pooffiill 45 17. gapphin Strut - 19th to Lmon 40 18. Sapphire Strut - Daqu to and 4S 19. Vingard Avuw - tbuzc6 to Bua Line 40 20. Whiterm Avuw - Btiranda to eui p0 cit7 lfaiu • 21. Victoria Yask Lue 35 22. Baayu Strnt - fray wet city limits to 40 Beryl Strut 23. Hilleida Road - frm Ranch Gata to 35 Ameffivat Strut 24. Lurch Strut -Tram Archibald Avamw 4p to Have Avuw 25. Su Herwrdino Road -tram Vingasd Avenw 35 to Archibald Avenw 26. Victoria Avenw -frog Htivaada Avenw 40 to Route 13 27. Highland Avuw - from Archibald Avenw 3S to Nemoaa Avenw 28. Highland Aveaw -frog Hanom Avenw to 45 800' rent of Haven 29. Vingard Avenw -from 8th St, to 45 Foothill Boultvard 30. linter Avuw - Pooth ill Blvd. to 4p Qiurth Sc. 31. Lemon Avenw - Arcbibald Avenw to 40 Hevee Avenw 32. Spruce Avenw - 81a Avenw to Bua Liu Rd. 40 33. Turoar Avenw - Poot6 ill Bout avard to 45 Bua Line Road 34, Victoria Windrw• Loop (north 6 south) 35 35. Banyan Serest from Heryl Street to . 35 London Avenw Drdirance Yo. 324 Page 3 Declared Priaa Facie Name of Street or Yoztfon Affected SDeed Licit (MPH) 36. Terra pieta Parkrq - 4;¢ch to Halpine 40 37. eau Line Road - Henow to ANw 45 38. Turwr Avww (Aetaou Ave.) - Poot6 ill 45 to Bue Liw Awd 99. Archibald Avenue - Hanyu to North end 50 40. 4urch Street - Naven to Ela 40 (Ord. 369 Section I (part), 1982: Otd. 39 Section 5.1. 1978). Reecho Cueuwga 5/82 124 (i) Hot6 eisty-five (65) miles per hoar and fifty-fiw (55) ails per Dour are rpreds rhichi are aura thu are rearowble or safe; (ii) The ailea pas boar u acted era the prLa facie rpeedr rhich ere coat appropriaN co facilitate the orderly movegat of tra!!ic wd are rpeed liaita rhich ue reuowDle wd ufa w Nid struts or portiow ehereol: (iii) 1Le ailu per Dour acted era hereby declared to ba ffie prima facie apaed iLite oa uid struts; cad • (iv) The Tralfic Engiwer ie hereby authorised and directed to iwtsll appropriate ^igma upon wid ^cseep giving aotiw of the price facie speed licit declared herein. Section 2 the Clq Clerk shall r•..i ~. _- ~~_ ~„::s: „i win urdiwnG and aball cause the rue to be publ irhed u required h7 ler. Sectiw 3 the Mayor shall ^igo thin Osdiwnce and the Ciq Clerk shall caeca the same to 6e pu611shed rithia flf taw (15) days al Nr iu paswge at lwt once is The Dsily Report. a nsapaper of gewral circulative puhl ished is the City of Ontario, 431fosnia, wd circulaNd is the City of Rancho Cucaaonga, 411fornia. The Mayor shall alga this Ordiwace and the City Clerk shall caeca Ne rue to be publ iahed rith to fifuu (15) days after itr paawge at lwt veee is The Daily Report. a nerapapar of general citculrtioa publ irhed in the Ciry of Ontario, 43itoznia, end circularid in the City of Rnneho Cucuoaga, California. PASSED, APpR09ED, ud ADOPTEp able ++rt day of ++++aee. 19B*. x,33 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: .October 21, 1987 i T0: Mayor and Headers of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENYlRONMENTAI ASSESSMENT AND YICTORIA COMMUNIri PLAN - reques c ange a use an zon ng es gna ions fraM Mediw (4-14 dwelling units per acre) and Mediuwt-Nigh (14-24 dwelling units per acre) Residential to Low-Mediw Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for a 24,67 acre parcel within the Victoria Planned Coaaaunity, located at the northwest corner of Vlcteria Park Lane and Milliken Avenue - APN 202-211-i3 and 14. • On October 7, 1987, the City Council conducted a public hearing to receive input on the proposed change. After receiving all input, the Cf ty Council deterwined that the request was consistent with the intent of the Yictoria Planned Coawunity and the General Plan. Asa result, the Council approved the change and directed staff to return with an Ordinance approving the aakndaent. attached for your rcvtew and first reading is the Ordinance approving Victoria Coaaaunity Plan Aaw:ndsent 87-02. Res idly submitted, Bra u e City PI nner BB:SM:te Attacnments: Ordinance Approving YCPA 87-02 1~ ORDINANCE N0. 3as AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMINITY PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 87-02, REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS FROM MEDIUM (4-14 DNELLIN6 UNITS PER ACRE) R SIDENT/AL TOILON--EDIIR~I RESIDENTIAL, (4N8TDNELLSNG UNITS PER ACRE) FOR A 24.67 ACRE PARCEL NITNIN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMUNITY, LOCATED AT THE NOIITHMEST CORNER OF VICTORIA PARK LANE AND MILLIKEN AVENUE - APN: 202-211-13 to considerHaRlAcawents otn the proposed Victoria Ccs~wnityiPlae MeiAsentrNO9 87-02. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cuusgnga City Council cakes the following findings: A. That the AswnWsient will provide for developaw!nt of a coeprehensively planned urban coswuniLy within the • District that is superior to developsw;nt othenrise allowable under alternate ngulatlons. B. That the Askndswent will provide for developswmt within the District in a sooner consistent with the General Ptan and with rotated dev-tnniwnr anA ~.,,.,.• eanagesent policies of the City. ~ ~ ~~+~~ C. That Lhe Askndsient will provide for the construction, ieprovesient, or extension of transportation fac111ties, public utilities, and public services required by developawfnt within the District. 13" STAFF REPORT DATE: October 21, 1987 T0: 'Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner ~` ~ ' a ~~ ~ ij U! ~i 1971 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13541 - pea o e ann ng aaa ss on s ec s on ap-prro ng a residential subdivision of 12 single faaily lots on 4.3 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located north of Red Nill Country Club Drive at Sierra VTsta - APN 207-411-l0, 207- 080-01 an0 48. RECOlMENDATION: The planning Commission recommends approval of the propose eve opment. • II. BACKGROUND: A. Original Planntny Coa~isslon Meeting: On July 8, 1987, the ann ng'Coi~eiss- of n rer ewe an unan nrously approved Tentative Tract 13541. The design of the tract consisted of a direct connection tram Red N111 Country Club Drive to the existing portion of Sierra Vista Street providin4 for the devetnnm.nr ~s I~ lute. During the public hearing before the Planning Conaission, several area residents expressed their opposition to the proposed direct connection due to the poor state of rep,,lr and narrow width of Sierra Vista that would be impacted by additional traffic. The residents felt that a cul-de-sac design would be pare appropriate. The Planning Commission, however, felt that the direct connection to Red H111 Country Club Drive was necessary 1n order to eliminate the long dead end street and provide a better opportunity for emergency vehicles to respond to the site. As a result, the Planning Conmisston approved the Tentative Tract Map. B, Apgeal to City Council: On August 19, 1987, the City Council conducle~a public Fearing to hear testimony on an appeal filed by area Sze;dents in opposition to the through connection of Sierra Vista to Red Hill Country Club Drive. The area residents stated that there were aiternatlve designs that could be used that would still allow adequate emergency access without providing a direct connection. The City Council, after receiving all public input and testimony, stated that the suDdiviston could be redesigned without the direct connection. Alternatives discussed by the Council members ~~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPoRT TENTATIVE TRACT 13541 - ALLMARK October 21, 1987 Page 2 I 1 1.~~ Included the use of two cul.de-sacs or the extension of Sierra Vista to provide one cul-de-sac with esergency access frw Montq Vista Drive to the east. In discussing these var/ous aiternattves, the consensus of the Council was that Sierra Vista not be a through street to Red Hill Country Club Drive and, as a result, referred the tentative sap back to the planning Coarlssion for redesign. C. Referral to Planning Caa~ission: On Septesber 23, 1987, the Pl ann ng1 -"Law s- sTT coniruct~a' public hearing to review the revise0 tentative asp. The new sap proposed to extend Sierra Vista south approxtsateiy another 300 feet and cul-de-sac it at the southern portion of the site. In addition, the applicant was proposing to extend the alley (Monte Ytsta Drive) along the east and north tract boundaries to connect to Sierra Vista to provide eaergency access. Area residents expressed Concern about the transition fros the existing ZO foot wide pavealent area to the new street width that would be constructed as part o/ the tract. In reviewing the new subdivision design, the Planning Cawission noted that the extension of Sierra Y1sta south and • the incorporation of she eul-de-sac along the south tract boundary e11s1nated the through connection to Red Hilt Country Club Drtre as directed by the City Council. fie Pianntng Caawlssion, however, felt that the extension of Monte Vista Or1ve along the east and north tract 6oundad•e "p,~n~ "... p.~o,iu< surricient turning area for eaxrgency vehicles, in particular the larger Fire District vehicles. As a result, the Planning Cawlistlon required that Red H111 Drive be extended to the west between Lots 5 and 6 to connect to Sierra Vista and that Monte V1sG Drive be terwlnated at the southern portion of Lot 1. The Planning Casatisston then approved Tentative Tract 13541. Councllperson Brown subsequently appealed the Colwisston's action. Re fully t , c r C!ty P nrer BB:SM:te Attachments: Exhibit "A" Exhibit '8" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Letter of Appeal Dated October 1, 1987 • City Council Minutes of Auggust 19, 1987 planning Cowdsslon Staff Re ort of Septealber 23, 1987 with Resolution City Council Staff Report of August 19, 1987 13'/ F~~ ~~~' , ~ `~ `~ ~ ~~„ ,\~~~' ~ ~~p,. ~ '• ~\\ ~\ oNd~ \ \ \ O ~pt~ ~. ~q8, CN b°t . ,~C-~ ~~ R~ aco by t~ 1~o<i Abe ptovi dts~9° O~tY CPb°~i, g1j30 °ts: ~S D°~~ssyc\n9 °°d Nast eo eye°9°' cp ~u^c"~ed~ ~~`ss`„E `J'.d°. tm^~~ ~ °°d ~``y Fop°bt 9°ta ~e ~°tb ~ybY ~J A~~bin9 °~ °Y • 5i~°tp6,1~,Y O~cY a a ONe'b etas e^ N° M°s5E c~•• ~a~t ~`~N ~,~,^.n 'h \'~~ SN ~\\ / ~~~ B+^~ N•1M a~~,•~. f~ r c G L _~xa~-~ F'tl ~ j. ~~ t ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r,. Dino a,. m~, x.a, ta„~,M,,Icmr,y I nw. No sn.tut October I, 1987 Mayor and Lity Council P, 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91)30 Dear Mayor and City Councllmembers: • I hereby appeal the Planning Coamllsston's decision aDProving TT 13501 by Ailmark Development with regard to the cul-de-sating and design of the street and ad,lourning aliey. Sincerely, . ~.~1lwn.IL~ Deborah N. Brown City Councilmember ONB:baa cc: Brad Buller Lauren M. Nassermen .~ +rr~ DeEwM N. aro.n hlRq KIM ty M.+w DennN i_ Stour [hula 1. aupYM 11 ~Q PrnN~ 1. Wripe IMKa M. Wr,mnri Cites Council Hiautes August 19, 1987 Page 16 • i e m + x E4. ENVIRONtgHfAL ASSESSMEHf A2N TENTATIVE TAACT 13541 - ALLHARK -Appeal of the Planning Commission's decisiom approving the dmvalopaent of a 12 lot aubdivieion on 4.3 'acres of land in the Loa Residnntial Districe (2-4 rivalling units per acre), located north of Rad Hill Cawty Club Drive at Sierra Vista - APN 207-411-10, 201-080-01 end 48. 'D:a appl icamt hu also filed s Tree Rmwal Permit. Staff report presented by Scott Nurphy, Associate Planner. Heyor Stout owned the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Comcil were: Nr. Defresm, 8500 Red Nill, whp stated that the basic pzobl em was the 60 foot rwd would cue into their residential area. Mr. Meguite, Clty Engimeer, stated chat wu being proposed nor would bm a 36 foot curb-to-curb rwd. The rest of the area could bm dulgnated s parlmray. Nr. Defrne stated that that would M okay although he did not see avy nod for eideralkn in that area. Hichel• Lindly, 8479 Omiao Sit, repreuntimg the nelghbox• tp the north of [h• propowd prof eci, staUd they did not obj act in any wry to th• • dwdopmemt of eh• lots. Thy did obj met to the stznt bring opened to through traffic for the following rmuoms: 1) the through sttemt rpuld double traffic, n heard in the abrupC marrwing of the street on the 36 toot width to th• 20 foot width of their ^trut; 2) bm a heard at tM 90 dmgree Lora on Sierra Vint• to Cuimo Sir if it rare opmn to through traffic. the naiRhbor• in th• area felt eh. N ti. h_a .!:.p - precadent by cloning th• Btut to through traffic aweral yarn ago at th• far north end of Sierra Vista with a fire rwd and a gate. 'lhay also felt the aesthetics of the pzopopd two Rreats mating have not bon canf ul ly thought out. the two naighborhoodn would not bm connistnmt with one another (the airs of the •truta and appaaranca of the •erutn). Tuy felt chat, see thetical lq. it could bs bmtter to hrvm the two nmighborhoode eepersted io sane ry with eitbar a col-de-tac or same oth mz aethod in order Lo kamp their acn idmntities. Thy tale the people rho ttrval oa Red Hill, unually try to find al tmrnatm routes during pmak hour im order co avoid the tratf is et AlU Cuesta. Thy felt many dr iver• would take shortcuts through their street to gp norN om Rmd Hill Country C1 ub Drive on Valley Visu. Thy rare also comcarnad if the strut does go through, and it is found to be • probl tv, the City might come in to correct it by widecing their asisting atieeta. Ih ay could thorn loo • trmamndoW count aF lendeceping, valwbla erase, fences, retaining rape and 3zivswayc. They die not aiah to u• their hamaa dutryed in such a ry and did not wish to loose the rural amd quimt Fmsl iag of ehais nmighborhoad. Shm ate tad thy rare asking the Cnuacil to Carefully consider thin mat wr and suggest a reaaouble el ternative which might prevent serious future consceq uences. Tory Miez representing the •ppl ioant, Allmark, Inc., 10070 Arrow Route, req carted chae the appeal be denied end that chy ba dlav ed co procmmd with their development. a-3q City Council Minuces August 19, 1987 Page 17 Being no forth ez public reaponN, Hayor Stout domed the public haring, Councilman Baguet acted he did not see 12 low pruenting • ujor inpaet for traffic flw. Hm did see it ma ^ major inpaet if you bad Sierra Vista connect all the rsy through to Rmd Hill Cowtry Qub Drive. tta felt for the 12 lots re could addrma th• ingra^ and egreu through the northern portion of Sierra 9iata poaeibly to Nonie Vista Drivm apprwch oa th• other end. Councilman Ring aLted hie preference vas thet Sierre Vista not go through. Cowcilramm Brwn stated she did not sae a crmaition from one neighborhood to the aL6 er mince the people Fran Red Hill rented to keep iha Brea rural looking, She could not concur rit6 the requirement of aideralks since ehia could not be conaietent rich the north end. Mr. Maguire. City Engineer, etaNd the probla in thin eons vu eh• coda did not give tb~ am option, but required 36 foot ride atraeta rich aidwralka, c urbm, and gut coca. Mr. Martoaan. City Attotwy, atmnd that Cowell mhould ba nose ehesa is an Ordioame. If Council rimhed co Hake thin chmp, then they would hews to direct an anandnent to th• Osdinanw. Th• Ordinaacn doom have • paragraph of e:ceptiona, Cowcil could •iaply 6ava to add Lh is to th• aataptionm. . Cowcilraan erwn ataNd mho could like to ue thL rich 2 col-des-ue'a. Mayor Stout atatmd h• bel laved that rhan the Cowty Mmignad th• Rmd Hill era, th eq res• very rNiaa in allwing soma o[ thna dngl• acena egpea of ei rn.H M.. u. s.,. .~i0. -- ~-ag~l~u., r.prciaiiy ii tn• •tN at U10 top bacaua blocked. Ne felt tbat public aafaty did coma fiat and agtnd eeKherica and th• rural lifutgla coca important. But ha felt there rere ocher rays to deal rith these iuuam [hrough daaigp. Mr. tLrlam, City Attoreay, atatad thrt parhapm th• developer rented to Hake e choice ac this point. If Cooneil ^umtaiaa the appeal, Cowed could have to direct staff to Dring back a raaol utim deaging th• tentative nap. IP the developer vmpd to calve th• tiw li¢em regal zed in the nap set, hr could go back and rede[iga thL in order to xw th• lit• of this particular map. Richard Avmt, Vices P[eaidant of Allmark, Inc., ^[ated h• could calve the time l ins requirement for eh• Cnwcil co act and go back to the Pl inning Commiuion. MOTION: Moved by Buq uet, uconded bq Bswn to refer eh im back to the Plmning Commiaaicn roc a nnp rwimien ie aceordaaw rich the Cowcil'm diacuaaim. Motion apprwei 3-1-1 (Stout - No, HrighC - abpnt). e R e f A R •:eetR • Mayor Stout celled a receem et 8:45 p. m. The encasing reconvened at 9:05 p. m. with ell members of eh• Cowell present. Refflfe ~~O • F~ CITY OF RADICHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 23, 1987 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Caasisslon FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner ~iG+s~p~ r ~~ ~ ~~~ <,, zr ^', >;~ , ~ A Fi Z .. > 19'7 SUBJECT: ENYIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13541 - - e eve oilmen o o cus om su v s on on ~3 acres of land 7n the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located north of Red Hill Country Club Drive at Sierra V15ta - APN: 207-411-10, 207-080.01 and 48. I. BACKGROUND: On July 8, 1987, the Planning Cowalsston reviewed and unan mousy approved Tentative Tract 13541. The design of the tract consisted of the direct connection from Red Hill Country Glub Drive to the existing portion of Sierra Vista Street providing for the development of 12 Lots. During the public hearing before the ptanning Cow•ission, several area rcstdents expressed Ue1r opposition to the proposed direct connection. They felt that the ennnerrinn ,.,,,nw .,.i. ,. additional traffic that could not be accommodated by the~extsting portion of Sierra Vista due to its poor state of repair and narrow width. The residents felt that a cul-de-sac design rrould be more appropriate. The Planning Commission, however, felt that the connection was necessary in order to eliminate the long dead end street and to provide a better opportunity for emergency vehicles to respond to the site 1n the event of an emergency. As a result, the Planning Cowtsslon approved the tentative tract map with the direct connection from Red Hiil Country Club Drive to Sierra Vista with a condition requiring that the new portion of Sierra Y15ta Street De devised with more of a curvilinear design subject to review and approval of the City Planner and City Engineering. II, APPEAL: Following a Planning Canm1551on hearing. area residents wed an appeal requestt~C t~•• ••~ City Council review the issue of the connection to Red Hill Country Club Drive. On August 19, 1987, the City Council conducted a public hearing to hear testimony on the appeal. Once again, the area residents stated their concerns about the proposed through connection and the impact it would have on their existing portion of Sierra Ws.a. They also stated that there were alternative designs Lhat could be used that would still allow adequate emergency access. City Council, after '141„ ITEId M PLANNING COMMIf `N STAFF REPORT TT 13541 - Al1m..R September 23, 1987 Page 2 • receiving ail public input and testimony, stated that the subdivision could be redesigned without the direct connection between Red H111 Country Club Drive and Sierra Vista and without sacrificing emergency vehicle response times. qs a result, City Council upheld the appeal of the area residents and referred the tract map to the Planning Commission wtth the direction that an alternative design be provided that would eliminate the direct connection between Red Hill Country Club Drive and 5lerra Vista. III. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant has resubmitted the tract map which proposes 12 Lots as was originally submitted. The applicant has, to response to City Council direction, eliminated the direct connection off Red Hill Country Club Drive. The applicant 1s proposing a cul-de-sac at the southern portion of the site thereby extending 5lerra Vista an additional 300 feet. In addltlon, the applicant 1s proposing to extend the alley along the east and north tract boundaries to connect to Sierra Yista to provide secondary emergency access. D. Environmental Assessment: The Pianrting Cemmmission issued a • ego ve ec ara on on uiy 8, 1987 for the development of 12 lots. Staff has renewed the latest submittal by the appylicant and has determined that the new subdlvlsion design will not create any additional adverse environmental imnarre rho.~.s,,... start recomamnds issuance of a Negative Declaration. IV. FACTS FOR FINDIN65: The protect is consistent with the General an an eve opmen Code. The project will not De detrimental to the public health or safety, or cause nul5ances or significant adverse environmental impacts. In addltlon, the proposed use and the site plan, together with the recommmnded conditions of approval, are 1n compliance with applicable provisions of the Development Code and City Standards. Y. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised 1n The Da11y RePOrt newspaper as a public hearing and notices have been sent'-~T property owners within 300 feet of tM s site, VI. RECOlMENDATION: Staff recomamends that the Dianning Commission con uc a pu c hearing to receive all input and testimony on the proposed subdiv/sion. If, after receiving att the input, the Planning Cosm/ssion feels that the revised subdlvlsion design adequately addresses the direction of the City Council, staff recommends thet the Planning Coaaalsslon approve Te.tatlve Tract • 13541. If, however, the Planning Commission determines that the proposal is not consistent with City Council direction, staff i4z PLANNING CGAMI.° `N STAFF REPORT TT 13541 - Alis.,x SepteaMter 23, 1987 Page 3 recoawends that the Planning Co~tsston refer this 1te~ back to the andlthat this~its be c~entlnued~to a loMrtheeappll entlto reavise the subdivtslon accordingly. Res ull subadtted, Bra C1ty tanner 88:91:rc Attachoents: Exhlbtt 'A' -Revised Tract Map Exhibit 'B' - Revised 6reding Plan Resolution of Approwi with Conditions • ~~ ~J -, - ._, ~. ~.~. -. ---~ ~~ -_ s i i ~~. • 6` A~ \ ta~~ .. t1. + ~ ~ ~, _~ 1 } ~~~~~ ~ a ~ ~. % ~ ~~ ~. .vi~~~ r 0 ~~ ~o-~, ~~ V \V vORTH CITY OF rre.~t: ,, /3~-~r/ RAVCI-IQ CUCA;~IOM„q TITLE S'~iC/"'L/~~~t/ PL.A.titi1;VG gVlS7pN EXHIBIT~_~` SGLE .~~ <4l[ C1~Y[ - LAWO CI~fTK 65- 74-_- _I ~'i ~ m ti . ._ ~ J i _ _" z 1~ I I iw Y; \ 6 I, sin ~r ~ ' _ SrrybreN Ww~ Q'~ ~~ ~~u F r 1 . ^~_7 b y~ C ~! .mac • nr • I '~ ~ r W Q =C ~~P l6 it 9 ~ ._ ~•.~t ~-~IC9~ ~Nkk -gINyE + ~i e • ~, ,' / °' i ~ Sl;6CIVUlOlti < ~ .s.r.i ~ ~ i e 3J69 ~~1.8, Zl: 33 - 5 9 ~ 7 7 ,~ •. ~~ , v FOR-!ON 6i"eilt..14 13 ~ i'~ it L~ u.L a~..6. I t 1 '2 ~A3, X2;,'33 ~ 'fry. y ~ ~ _~ "_!3 ~h .--_ ~m.,,,`..r ~. ~ ~ ~~~ ~ , ~ O ~ ~ur~c_'iYr..~-.~ 1 Awe 1 ~ 4 ~ >s.;;. ~ a \ 'I M.3._'~. \ 7 lam: ~ ii ~ I 1~. \C~RTH CITY OF `~ ~ ~~ R.ak7-IO CL'~;~ION(,A rrE.~~: ~ ~3nr TITLE ~,T /yG4,o • PLA.tiV1~iG Di~'1SION EXHIBfT ~ SCALE' - /~ 5 ~f-PP,~o v~ ~Y ~~~i-/iNG C~iI9~5 s>/aN> ,~- • its ~~ ~ (il j ~ :i= t ,I~ I~. ~~~. - !j 11 ~I : -___ ~~ 'l 1 ~ _ _ - Ili ~ ~ ~ a 1 . ~i , _ _ .-~_ .. !- __ ~__jl,l _. ~f ~~S' ' : ~-, ~ ~~ , --~ _:. ~Pr~Z p 9 -; ~- -- ~. :,,; 't ~.. ,,yi :~d ` '' ,~ ~~,. .~` \ I~•' 1 ~\K /: '~. \~ TJ J \ .,` ~~.. 1 i.. 1 / ~' 1- ~'i i .` Ci-., ~~ ~. . ~ ~ .- _ ; i ~' 1 i..., _ r- ,,_ '"~ `~ ~,- CITY C~' ITEM: _~ /3S~// ~ R.~tiCHO CL'CAMON(,~ rm,E: ~ ~4-.v PI.A,~ti1~1G DIVISION EXHIBITS C SGLE~ 1~ VOR'fH • RESOLUTION N0. 87-i74 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSIDN OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCMNINGA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N0. 13541, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 12 LOTS ON 4.3 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB ORIYE AT SIERRA VISTA STREET IN THE LON RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT - APN: 207-411-10 and 207-080-01. A. Reeftals. (i) Altaark, Incorporated has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Nip No. 13541 as described 1n the title of this Resolution. Herclntfter in this Resolution, the tuD,lect Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as 'the application", (11) On the 8th dAy of July, 1987, the Planning Co~isslon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application, concluded said hearing, and approved the prolact on said data. (111) Following an appeal filed Dy area residents, the City Coundl of the Ctty of Rancho Cucaanga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the appllutton and concluded said hearing M that. The City Council stated that . the proposal shall be redesigned and referred the application Dack to the Planning Coa~isslon. (ivl On the 23rd of Septeaber, 1987, the Planning Cawlsslon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on thet date. (v) All legal prcre~isttes to the adoption of this Resotutton have occurred. g. Resotutton. NON, THEREFORE, 1t is hereby found, deterslned and resolved by the Ptanning Coalisslon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Goa~lsston hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth 1n the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution arc true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Cowolssiun during the above-rcferonced public hearing on SepteaDer 23, 1981, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Carmtssion hereby specifleatly finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located on the north side of Red H111 Country Club Drive at Sierra Vista Street with a street frontage of 60 feet and lot depth of 273 feet and 1s prese~.cty vacant; and (b) The property to the north, south, east and west are designatloned for residential uses and are presently developed with single family residences. 14-1 PLANNING COMMISSI~„ RESOLUTION N0. tt 13541 - A1lnbrk Septeaeer 23, 1987 Page 2 • (c) The proposed prolecL, with the recaeoended conditions of approval. coepltes with all aAnteue standards of the City of Rancho Cucaeonga. (d) The estensllan of the alley fron its current location to Sierra W sta will provide secondary eaergency access to the site. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Caw•tssion during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the spetlfic findings of Facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Ca~ission hereby finds and concludes as follows; (a) fiat tentative tract !: ::r.:!~'--: with the General Plan, Developaent Code, and specific plans; and (b) fie design or iprovaoanes of the tentative trace Ts consistent MTM the General Plan, Developwnt Code, and specific plans; and (c) the site is phys/ally suitable for the type of deretop~ent proposed; and (d) The design of the subd1v1s1on 1s not likely Lo cau substantial envtraneentai daerge and avoidable 1nlury to huerns and wi1d1~ or their habitat; and (el fie tentative tract 1s not likely to cause serious Dub11c health probleas; and (f) fie design of the tentative tract witl not conflict with any easeaknt acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Co~isslon hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered 1n cosgllanee with the California EnvlroneenWl Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Ca~isslon issued a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth to paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Coerlsslon hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the atUched Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Engineering Dtvision: a. Sierra Yiste Street: 2) Eight loch curb and gutter per City Standard Drawing No. 303 shall be used; and 31 Sidewalk shall De located 0.5 feet fro~a the right-of-way 1,d line along bath sides of the street. 1) Provide 30 feel of dedication eaNSUrcA fro centerline (~ feet total) and a standard eul-da-sat Dulb; PLANN SNG COMMISS "V RESOLUT:CN N0. TT 13541 - Allure September 23, 1987 Page 3 • f ti ll b i d ll h b. The ve map s e rev se as ows: a o knta 1) The portions of the proposed alley ad,)acent to the north and east sides of Parcel 1 shall be eliminakd. 2) An alley shall be provided from Sierra Vista Street to Red Hi 11 Drive between Parcels 5 and 6, which shall be dedicakd and paved to a width of 26 feet. 3) Parcels 1 through 5 shall be moved northerly and the widths proporiionakly adjuskd considering 1) and 2) above. 4) The east/west alley (formerly Red Nill Drive) from the east tract boundary to Chula Vista Drive shall be improved to alley standards including a total pavement width of 26 feet, a minimw 0.1 foot overlay of the existing pavement a~ the trimming of vegetation that exknds into the pavement area k a height of 14.5 feet. 5) The portions Of the alley from the east/west alley (formerly Red Hill Orive) k the south boundary of Parcel 1 shall be improved to alley standards /ncluding a total dedication and pavement width of 20 feet, a minimum 0.1 foot overlay of the existing pavement, maintain driveable access to the property to the east, and provide a haamerhead turnaround near the north krminus as approved by the Ctty Engineer. 6, The Deput,( Secretary t0 tMs Commission shall certify to the adoptfon of this Resolution. APPROVED AND AQOPTEO iHIS 2380 OAY OF SEPTEM@ER, 1987. PtANNI NG C \fr~yS~S I~O~N~OF TH~IE'[~C7ITY~OtF ~RA~NCHO CUCMIONOA BY: ATTEST: 1, eraef Buller, Oeputy Secretary of the Planning Coawisston of the City of aancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopkd by the Planning Coa~ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Caawission held on the 23rd d4Y of Sepkmber, 19@7, by the following vote a-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOl5t0Y, QLAKESLEY, CNI 7IEA NOES: GUMMiSSiONERS: EHERitK ABSENT: COIMISSIONERS: NCNIEt ~~ ~J ~~os~ ~x,~~~ ~~in^ aa,.. sa;;~{ gg?a; I~_ i~; a ;~ - Is _~ ~~ S ~` R' ~ r gs ~i ~; ra ~~ ~t ~~ ~! ~~ ~i ~~ :, ~ i ;~ a ~r ~ . I I I ~ e~ ~ . s - ~~ ~ ~ ~ r ~3 ~~t ~ r ~ ~ =~ ,~ a # xa~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ e ~ r ~ ; a ~ P ~ ~ ~ =~P ~ i 3 ~gi " = r _~, ~ ~~~ ~ I ~ a g pgi i~ F~ - 3 ~a I I I~ I~ ~l ~r a r;s~ sg At_-e g~~ t3~~x I° a w = ~ ~s~- di~~~` ia~ `~~?r t s ~.• P =sB js g} } r ~ z~! aiS~ ~ ~P ~r~j~ r ~P~ ^~ Ps iEt ~°_~ t_g ~r 3 r-r r i~ i :~ :ia ~'a~~ ~~= i vP #i~ ~i~gg sg= ~~P~~ ,,; ~c 1 ;s~ „_P v ==x ;S i~P c~tPP i i ~gs il~~ ~g~ ~s~i~ s• _ sti a;-ri s? ~tt 1S'O - ~e .x tIIT•t- -+il~ir r ^~~lr~~~is1 ;~ a;°gi ~st.,~~i~3. i f~,~~s~l~i~~~ lig~~c~c;~~i ~:r"==~ ~ s pia - pg=; v A!3 g~'E; `Q! P a(s. Y~ g_- _~~s~~,~~ ~! ~~"~~c;~c~3 t ••"a~ta'.^2~a W Q~ N 1 i i a ~e~~i~ ~i~3}E S, +3} s:ra9 3a3a3 }~},~ ag F%~ agja} ~ax~~3 g3+1,}F csiieE I~T } ~~! x'` q a~~~a" ,} s;S s- ~__ss ~`zt~ Rs}'~_ ~s E~} _=fRS ii-j_3 ~~}ss ~53;'~ e x ~~ 3~f~ ~3 i't~ E~E E s~ ag= ~ El: .~c s f~ ~~R ~r_ ,3~ ax~ i~ 7s ~ZR. :- ~p ;;qr f= i- ii~ ' { c e£1 xs : I i~F ~: =fir ~~; iFa ~s~~r ,!}~~ zx~ g~.,xi Fe£ ii ~~}9 S'- ~ ~- }43 ~Ii ~}~f x~3 S£ g~:; ~~} is '^s= s~F '_~ E; 1= 3 di s,xx Y!s ~ S~a~ !~: is ~:~x • • ~- = i ~ I I .~ Ss 3. i e-S^ ;xr }~s 8 ta35i41P Si~'E ~3}ea Fa. jS'3~ ~s if xf=Y~s=~ ~'~ [~,x~! ~~~~} c8~~x ~$~it rc£ ~ is}Si sxs^ FEIx! 'F= ~ 1~? 3} SS ~4 ~# Rj~~ '~S~~~R~{ ~}: a! ;-} ~#~si 'R,~ e_ }A~ ~ s^ !c sE=- -~EEESsx ;i~~ sec `-~ c,~i s 3S: sx:ass t." a~$t: °Fr. 3~9'~ e s P ~ r:'£ a ~a 1F~x z s~~ ~~~,3a ~~$st3s~i ~x~~ cF'3 S ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~~! ~caxy3~ s~q~~E~X~ ~=Sa ~~~x xx :x:s ! Fix 3xiax-t -e?, se .is xal~ tffs: 'Icy I~ I~~~ ~ I I l j- ~ z ~asi=.s -aar Fii io3~ ~; cy :i~ °_!_ .i3- I~c;;' R~=e~g~ ~t~ i~ ~-p: a~ }? Asa f9a a °-~~j is~? ~3s4^:a 9~it ss ywl! g! ° g~: at- 4 ~~~~ c~~j ,! I1Ha ~:?t viii sl is -t~ cs'a a £~t! a=ax 's~ ~ 3 ds ~¢ ~= g~r~! tie s £a= ^s+~~ "S jts^ s4 ? -~ 4j ~ s.jj ~g~ 3; 1 _~I; i+~¢~' i~s ~ g~'~3 Sj t ti E: isf~ i~; .• s = a _ t- a_ tj3 aii ~t cs~~ j~ a ,~~ I? i ss ~ ~jj . ^J 3 _=- e t}a~ 3a ~S';~ ~9= J3 34w'~ ? ~ ja if Ija SRR W ~_ I` I~ I~ I I I I ~_ ,' ,~~ ¢ E' pj s~tjf ~~~ l~7~7ga ~,r~j t.s js ~j: j.~c~ a_w~ jj ~ t! i g~~'ijai~ ,a 3qg z:~,.=9 i~i~ ,e a~R7" • } ?is3 i=ii=i F, ~- =z~ 't ii~ a„~j 4~r1 ~i ;! ~! _3'~q=8~ a5 ~} 3~ '~^ ~C~ 9529 ~iYj ~t ti~_4 x~: 'fit;;~ i j• $r- ;~ jj~" _'• t: Melt r3~~i~~~~~~ xi !ca s'~.t~ _~"ti " ~._ Es 3g 'gX`a is"~s:9"ti a^ '~y~ ii Maa „;?y v`~• s 4~~j` x.-t°si~xa~ 93 s' ~ IMf gtt' 4e~ s 3 !,f i~;~tgier"s st $~ s ~' s;-t • 3 ~J .. a 1Rr:.gg9: 4~ 39 ¢ q3 ,..9q A 2 0 0 I~ LEI- : _;^ a~ ~`"s se< _t~= =xa x+ ax. ~~-~ ~ ~ s~fs °~r a,~= ,-r d :a3 !"^~ x,~s~ ~Ri ~~~Q :S X ASS •3gg~ ~es^} ~A a? Y~ i° '~ ,. A9 . , x ,. ~-s1 p_ js9 n~ x S 4 I i I_ ~ I~ i I~ I I~ ii e i > - ~_ w ~ Y s'! - P z a a ~ s t•= ~ ~ _ __ i s a;~ i3 ~~~g ~ ;~s~ !a! ~ l = j~fs s i~~ 1= eg~± ; ggs g~3 ~ ~ ai~s + # ' „_s ~ t . i~ -~ ;1P1 ~ ~~i P.~ ~ x~~~ P f: l ~ ~ ~tfs i S: c I_ I= I ~ I I~ Ivy 33R ~ ~=:P ~ -f 4: £'~ ~- as ~ ~;,~ i is~~s ^f p ~S 1w~=3 ~ yy~rr1 2F ~ PP~~~ `~;j ~7Rs ;3 s ~~3~~ j~~?~ affil ;' _9 ~ - ~~a ~;~3f .i i ~~ ~ ~ s3~;,5 x ~3 _r ~~_ #sxs~ ?~r: ~z ?~F: I~:~~i IY 15.3 ~ I~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~.~ ~~~ 1~7~ A R ~~~~ ~~ ~ t~ i c "e!I ~x~~ ~~i f'* ^RC i'~g3 P£7 ~j isi ~gP 3~= Rr£ y ~• ~ ~ 5~~ _ ~~ : 7 -t3 ~ y p ~ 1P ~ £ 3 : ~ iP= 1~f y ~ ~ ~ ~ iy ~~N ! i~'F ~ ~ ^ a3~ ~ ~ •~ ~ ~£ ~ ~?, t ~ i7 s-~ :~~ ~3s =~ ~;ss ~ i~" ~'" ~'Ji It i~=~ ss~ sE£. • C H • ~~ I ~ ~ aid ~3x aiF xsa-~ is""=Da mgrs ° z _ t ~ i . ? :ti ';~3~ 8 ~s s~ c yig~ ~.ixc ~ __ "^r q - i 0 • ~~ f ~~~ +e !~ ' Rt i ix~s ~~sr[ t - to d_~: t+s = e i~ 't,.: ss'j i j 33 ++. ia~ i?! + ~ fs d it.i t~R. ~e' ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~s sx33 s ~~? ~9^ s tote ~ s+ ~~+ ~~ ~~3t ~i ~~ ^3 ~= s jS€~ =; " ~; QE ~ 8. ip r , fga :~ +s t r~ tr 33 s ~i ~ ~' + '~3 j~ ~r~ ~ ~ ~ ~e Is fs ._ [ ;£ ~ fe t~ 34 t ~ ~ R g x, i 7 ~ y ~ = it g i ° i r _ r ` t Pj s . t i i s x! -;~ S'se' ++x~ i~~ 1 t- w= e~3- '~~ ~N#~ =i ~ Pi~£ ~ t ~~ ~_ r3 ~t cig ttF3 a ss t..i? I ~ I_ I I~ I I~ I~ It ~~ - ,, ~ ° ~ i nt '~c a+ t~; I a € ~t _~-_ t;st ai r a~ 't~t ~ ; a w ~ i i i ~~ ~~~~ Is1+', act 3~i~fl s .3~ I ~ i=? x city ~i ~~ °s,e i x ~R ~ ~t 3~! °~.~~i Qi~ t• 4~~ ~ ~ x' 3q f ~Y!^~ R z °_ 4 t 3+ a~- is ~ M~3 .A R (~ iY ~!~ ~ R~a~ x~S n ~~~; ~ •' ~ I ~ e tti 3~iR:z ;~x z aF• £ r" t ~ i" ~xi~~^ e~ a5q~ a i _ xc~ e~t,y~ 3 3 axe? „ a I~ I ~I t ~Is 4ss s gsis~t :it 154- t'f I~ a xga .C '` ;~ ~w ~ \ ~ ~~_ Rc~ f;~3" isr ;~~ ~~ 3~! +;; ;''S i; ~i.`~ ~ 1 ~9- 3R ~ "-3 i! ass ' 3 ~~ x33 ¢~; z _ a ~~,~ ~ R. ~~ ~'~~~ ~K ~~ £9 }~~g- ~ s- ~ • ss ce" 'Rsaa ~# s~ I f I X34 '~~~~ ?'": !s ;ga '~~ se ~~ •a+ ss ~p! _3 ?g sa S3 3R' ~E ;~a =: 3~~ ~g ~R. `° a _ :~ gds I ~ I~ :~ ~ #3 t xs ~ =s ~__ i~ s e; s{ ?s Y ^, Y ~ ~ ~. ` \ ~~ ~ ~ ~. u ~ € ss tt~ ~ ~~ ~F= a fi! S5 i ;d ~i i f~ =t ~~ c4 t i _~ a~ f; R i g ~~ i ~ ~ ~ ~: , ~ :~ ~~ ~~ i d± s : a r ~ ~r ~ ar !E ~~ a ~s I It I ;• , i i I` s -~ «~ c~ s _~ ~£ s ~ -~~ a "-~ pia ~x ~P~=~ ~~ gq ~~ ~__~"+ i~ F~ air ~~ ~i;~ ~= c+~ : ~ ~~~ ~ ~f ~' ~ ~~ ~ c~ ~ ~'a~ ~~ ~ Rf+ ;i :~~~ 3 ! 33 i s~i'~~ ~~ i a~~ ii i~ 3 'J cass~ "~ ~tr ~~ ''~ E ~ '~- ~i~ ~; ~pp53~ S 9 3 ! _ p 4 Y S4C-J ~' S 1~•_ ~y~ ~~^ ~ ~ ; ~Rf.i R ~ 3~# xi sSS9 .. I~ a x"?~ ~. ~' s~' ;~~i} =~~ ice;, V ~; ~`~ ° 3xr 'rs • s~ ~~! x" is 3~°. R` = x~,. s13 3i~ ;~ ~~~~: S;t Sew iR ~. •~3~ -~j i=~ }3 ~Z_-}~ 33 !x ~~ 7t ~~3 c~! ~~~ ~~ x~~~~ ~~~ =rs s~ g3,. ~ ~~i ~~ !f ~°t~! ~c'!! it ~~ ggs`~ ~~# i ci '~ss3 ~! _~ I`I,~ I_ ~ $ si ~~~ ~ `~ 3'~~ ~ ~: -~: F~ s~. 3 x.~ S~ 3~ ;~ £~ ;~- _~~ R _; ~S~ ~ xs q i ~ ~f r~~ # ~~ ~ i ~i ~3 ~ '~ sc £ ~~ I I,\ !F ~i C~ ~r r 1= R~ ~!3 9= r~ x. =Y ~3 £S 4 9r ~_ ii £S ~s :x I I I It 13 I It I ~. i i i ~ ~q ~i! s ~x ~}~ ~# ~ ~p'~3~ ~} _ six ~. Fa~~ i t 1 ~r 3p ~ e. ~ Ca ~ 3y~x~ ~ >~>E! ~ s ., =a ~ ' w ~ ^s~s~ ~i ~ ~x3 ~i ssj~ ~~ 1 I~ e C I, \ I ` I~ I. I \ _ s `g~ ibis x~'3 a~ ~ ~! to ~ '' ~!_ ii "~ ;j ~~a :p- a~! ~ ~~ ! s~ ~~g~ ii a~ai ~i~; t d y~ , ~,-- i ~Q~ ~ s ~ ~; ~ °la ~ g~~~ ~ sx A~ *: ~t ixi 3 i ! i ~ a ar ~ ~ ~ s !s i ~~~ ~(;~ ~s ~_ ! ga. ~ i ~ ~_~ w£~ s~ 'f~ a i ~a~ ~ xaa ~e ~ s •V ~' \ w ~zZ I 3~2 e!s ys~ ~x~ ;~_; s;7 ~. =off 1~ a!~ !! ~: ~}R „QS C !~g s r~ ;' ,i x ai ~~ ;~~ =~ ., ~; ~s - CITY OF RANCHO CCCAbIONGA ~~c STAFF REPORT >~ • <~ }'. DATE: August 19, 1987 i T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Duller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13541 - ALLMARK - Dea o e ann ng omm ss on s ec son approv ng a residential subdivision of 12 single family lots on 4.3 acres of land in the Low Residential Distrtci (2-4 dwelling units per acre), iocated north of Red Nill Country Club Drive at Sierra V15ta - APN 207-411-10, 207-080.01 and 48. I. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recoawends approval of the propose eve opment. if, after receiving all public testimony and input, the City Council concurs with the recommendation of the Planning Commission, then dental of the appeal would be • appropriate. II. BACKGROUND: On July 8, 1987, the Planning Commission unanimously approve entatlve Tract 13541. During the meeting, area residents expressed concern about Lhe proposed connection of sierra Vista to Red Ni11 Country Club Drive. fie reNMnse Eyr .-. ..,,,,--y;,,-, euuid result in additional traffic that could not be accommodated by the existing portion of Sierra Vista due to its narrow width and poor state of repair. The residents felt that a cut-de-sac design would be more appropriate. III. ANALYSIS: In Tts deliberations, the Planning Coawisston focused upon a need for the direct connection for the public safety in the event of an emergency. By not providing a direct connection, the Planning Commission felt the excessive length of the existing dead end street would severely limit the ability of the fire or police departments to respond. A. Throu h Street vs. Cut-De-Sac: Being a dead-end street of approx ma e y ee n ength, Sierra Vista is over two times the length of the 600 feet allowed by City and Foothill i Fire District policy for dead-end streets or cut-de-sacs. The Foothill Fire District and Sheriff's Department have responded to the appeal stating their position on the various alternative circulation proposals (see attached letters 1. It is the Ft re District and Sheriff Departments' ~plnlan that t~ ~ Sierra Ytsta should De connected to Red H111 Country Club Drive. Other alternatives would create additional delays in emergency response times. ~7 CITY COUNCIL STAFF 'PORT TT 13541 - ALLMARK August 19, 1987 Page 2 • Sierra Vista is presently a stub street that was Intended to be. completed as a through street. A Dreviously approved tract map for this site also planned to complete Sierra Vista as a through street. B. Access to Red Hill Country Club Drive: The area residents a so expresso concern a e a ility of vMlcles to safely pull out onto Red Hill Country Club Drive. The residents stated that the curve of the street and the location and height' of plant mater1a15 cakes driving the street dangerous in its current condition and that pulling out onto Red Hill Country Club Drive would be even core dangerous, fie Planning Caesission stated that traffic speeds are a concern throughout the entire Red H111 area and arc not limited to dust this area. In addition, regardless of the design of the tract (direct connection or cul-de-sac), there would still be a connection to Red Hill Country Club Drive. As a result, the Planning Cdawission added a condition directing staff to investigate trefflc control lnstallatlons along Red Hill Country Club Drive. AS was mentioned at the Planning Coawisslon meeting, there 1s a lot • of thru trefflc in the Red H111 area. While no immediate solution is available over the next few months, the Engineertny Division will be initiating a Traffic Management Program which would solicit input from area residents eoneernlnn tnr,l iref!!t ^••••+--- ••--.-«... TGc Red Hill area has been identified as one of the first areas in the program. Res fully ltted, B B City Tanner BB:SM:ko Attachments: Letter of Appeal Letter from Foothill Fire District Letter from Sheriff's Department Planning Commission Minutes Planning Coawlssion Staff Report C~ 1s$ - ,L. _ .. July 14, 1987 ]'Gc7! -RECEIVED- CITY OF RAlIC40 C9GANON^_a Dear Mayor Stout and Council Members, PM ~~~_~-'.~=' PF1 r. The encloaed appeal is Deing submitted on behalf of the residents of Camino Sur and Sierra Yieta regarding tantalite tract 13541. Also find encloaed a map illustrating our proposed alternative. Any questions regarding thin appeal or our proposed alternative aY De directed to Michelle ar Tom Lindley Jr., x+79 Camino Sur, 985-4432. • Thank you for your consideration. ~ ~` ~1'~~_~' , ~ - Resnectfully. / ' ",/ ~ ``"\ Michelle Lindley ~' ciTr ov ~A~+c~ilo cucaw-ua ADMINISTRATION Iw ze,~,en,ai,~y~ ~ ! 1sq Suly 9, 1987 Rancho Cucamonga City Council • City Hall 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Tentative Tract 13541 Dear Mayor Stout and Council Members: We, the residents on Sierra Vista and Camino Sur, vish to appeal the decision made by the Planning Commission on Suly 8, 1987, regarding the proposed development of the 4.3 acres of land located north of Red Hill Country Club Drive at Sierra Vista. We have no objections to the development in general of the above referenced parcel as we agree that such development could increase the value of our homes. We do, however, object to the proposal that Sierra Vista become a through street for the following reasons: 1. The homes on the vest side o! Sierra Vista are currently faced with the disadvantages of having no view, and an Edison company easement with power lines cutting through the west side of our lots. There[ore, • ve feel the only real value to those homes an the vest side is the fact that there is very limited traffic on Sierra Vista. 2. Both Sierra Vista and Camino Sur are posted to allow for golf cart traffic and several of the rne;~nn. ~_ on these streets who are members of the Country Club do traverse these streets regularly in their clover moving golf cads, a fact that all o[ us on the street are aware and cautious of, due to the narrowness of existing streets. 3. Several of the families on Sierra Y15 to have small children who xould De exposed to the additional dangers of the increased traffic on a through street. 4. The ingress/egress for this proposed project is anticipated to be from the south end of the develop- ment at Red Hill Country Club Drive however, with the majority of major shopping being to the north on Baseline and 19th streets, it seems logical that if Sierra Vista were a through street the nex residents would drive north un Sierra Vista rather than south to Red Hill Country Club Drive, 'hen north on Valle Vista or Alta Cuesta. 5. Even though only 12 lots are proposed, most families today have a minimum of 2 cars, (or poss'bly 3, vish a teenage driver) which could conceivably nearly double the curre r.t traffic flow on Sierra Vista and Camino Sur. We have lived wSth the potholes and eroding surfaces oP t:~e se streets for some Lime but the possible addition of ~~ Rancho Cacamonya City Council Re: Tentative Tcact 1354: - pale traffic from this proposed development would further • contribute to the existing erosion. 6. Current city requirements for residential streets require a 36' width of paved street in addition to curb, sidewalK and parkway area. Since Sierra Vista and Camino Sur have only a 20' width of paved street, opening Sierra Vista to through traffic will, we feel, create a hazard due to the abrupt narroxing of the street from 36 feet to only 20 feet in width and the City's Engineering Department has stated that they have no plans to widen the existing paved surface on Sierra Vista or Camino Sur. Sierra Vista currently dead-ends at the north end of the street and is accessed only via an approximate 90 degree turn onto Camino Sur. Due to this configuration, a member of the Planning Commission agreed that traffic faced a much more serious hazard in accessing the proposed development Erom the north than from the south. The development company stated that they intend to widen the entrance at the south end of their development, remove some existing tall shrubbery to provide bettec visability, and agreed to install the necessary signage to create a four-way stop at the entrance to their project and Red Hill Country Club Drive. . The Planning Commission seemed to have no problem with the idea of leaving Sierra Vista a closed street other than for access of emergency vehicles. ii:ac eecng the case, we would liKe to propose that an alternative plan be adopted to provide access for emergency vehicles while still restricting the flow of through traffic, by means of a cul-de-sac or similar configuration at the north end of the proposed new development with a Crash-gate access for emergency vehicles. On contacting the Foothill Fire District, they voiced no objection to the idea of crash-gate access and, in fact, such access has been in existence at the north end of Sierra Vista at the entrance to the private road For many years. ^. he development company does not plan to build on, or occupy t'ne;r oro ~OSed sub-division, and stated at the Planning Commission meeting their willingness to ecrk with the existing resident=, Therefore, we hereby respectfully request the City Council to either overrule the Planning Commission decision, or uphold the decision with the revised condition that Sierra Vista remain a closed street while providing emergency vehicle access there by • protecting the value of the existing homes, reducing the risk of accidents, and maintaining the more rural enviconment that the existing residents value so highly. Ne thank you for your consideration in this matter. Rancho Cucamonga City Count _: Re: 'tentative Tract :3~4: • ~ c. c ~ c • .. ~ ~' ~~...y Yame e''~/ D ~amez?~~~f~-~..oo,, fi-E.. J«440/N dam ~~~~ i~ . j' / )(ame / /%, ~ c -r -e , - e a,b2 Address ~~, r~~~t ~ : ~ 'r~ ' Address 1 / Address ~ ~~T~ ~~rv ~~.~ ~u.:J AddreSS Address S'~f70 ,{~ L"~liL~ ~(7 / .fcu7 mil/ Address Address ~1t4/h Sv.ua ~~ Address 7~~~ ~~t~~~n/ Address $'479 Ca.., Address Address Address ' s Address Address a~z Address ; /~. '_-, Address .. % Address /~ Address ~ „_.,e Rancho Cucamonga City Council Re: Tentative Tract 13541 Name c, ~ :. H,:,,,y~h,lL cx~t/uf,.. Name iznl,,,n y:,. ~t~,l~.Lu t~n. Name Name - 0 Name L1~~Vl1I.,I1 ~~ /~L/C:~ Na:ge / .~~t Y~~ ~I _IE ; •~e~_flJ~~ Name ~, 141 il~Lt.~C;~n~Ll xame N s ni>.. ..___ r Name Name Name N.~mn Name Name Address 7P 7y -tc4ra i,uf Address 7P7v ~.~~~7~~„J Addreas '7 c'.SS ~,Pnn I-5 cis Address ~e ~ i' ' Address Add7rpas s/,~~ .~. ~GL' Jt'f~.~,~2 '. L.i,'L . Addresa~ ~1d ~ l Address / Address ~ • 7910 S.ctra U~ SrA nuaress Address Address Address Address Address Address Addres9 Address 163 ti i, :~ ,.. 39 ]? ~~- ~ s~ -> ,, - r, ~: - -- - T ~ - - -o I '~ i I II. ~ ~ i W __ _. y1._~ T .~. "! I 1 ° i ~ ~ K ' 13 ar- u - __ i 7 :8. ~ ~"LT ly O N • ~ 11~ I . ~ ~ I~. 1 j ~~ II _~ - r,.,.., ~, ~' ,~ ~ B i ~ I !~ _ _ r ~ ~ eN.I ii 7 , ~ v ~ I I ~\ ` S ~. •WY I it _ J _ _ _I . I :_- ~ ~ =a _ ~\i ~~ . 6 - ,,'-. y, -`..w ~».~. ~. ~ 7ld B •• ~ 9 2 i ~ 10 '~ a ..a.. ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~v •a.r i • i' ri Ar , ~ ~ f - II , _`~~ ! nsr .~. -#, i~Y-~- - l~Nr ~t Cam.. '2 i11 -~ ~,~ y ~~ M.a z ~ ---14 13 IZ AFD rLL also. •A ,ns. ¢I,-33 ?7FLTION 1- ~+.v.r - / 3 n~~ ~~-3 t \ ~ ~~ 4 M,3,a2~` cir~r or ~,~: ~,~,, ~'cHO cL~c~v~a~~c~ ,T,~~~-M,~ a[ACVtvtt~G avt~av 11oq. ~ ~ T, e ,r ~I ~.I • :J -. il' 'del j ' ~ v9 n3 ~_ ._~ _ .. _.-_ ~ m i 8 I ~ r, ~~ I ~ 98 71 ~ I ~ ILa~. ..:.. ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 i 63 70~~i ~ ~~ 2 ~ ~ R~/~/ \ r I -~~ I 9~ I~ ~ I_~__13 •~~.. mar ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~~ I r I ~.%tii-`L~.'• ~ .~ur~ ~ ~ nsr ~ ; I 1" 1- Y • p '~ ~'I `7 ~~ ~ . -~ i ~ nM~I ~ jib, ~, n+.r T _~. ~Y-~ - !DI ~ Y ~f ~0 ~ t ~ 'I ~ ~ ~fi w, „~~~, ~ I ! ..o':rriar 3089 M.3. 2 :..':'/..14 i3 ~ 12 ~ :1F~rLL .it~3. T'JIdTION i'i ~s, ~ ~~ 3 ~~ a cif. 1 ~ n +n.3aZ~\ ~'~ • ` ctrY or ~.,<< _ . ~ %~r ~~cHO cL~cw~~a~ •~, ~7L,~M.~ ,, , , ~ 1 -- , _: -, -- _ ~ ~~I - . ~ j 56 ~~I__ --..._-_--i ~ I V - ~ . v.. r.. .~ \ 83 .~ ~ III ~ n~=.. ~ _ ~ 10 ~' ~ e ' 3 ~: ~ , i 23 ~ ~ ~' ~~ 3 V ~,~ .i rl '`~ aY.. ~ 1 ~ w ~~-. r YON,/ I,i ~INIJ•_~T I ~~ ~ ( I ~ ^ T ~ I JAB:, e..rr ~ ,~~ ,. ~* I4 I3 ~ IZ %7ED ALL iw` ^ne. X21, 33 . ~. ~T ~w`s LTp TbN ~~ . .S '~i /~ 9 ~ ~ / ,~ e , ct~ or ~.,~: ~,~~ P[~1iYiVI(~ D(VLSlON '.(o(i T a ~ July 17. 1987 Re: Tentative Tract 13541 Dear Mayor Stout and Council Members: Regarding the appeal requesting that Sierra vista not be made a through street, I would like to express my personal feelings in addition to the [easons stated in the appeal. Although "Red Hill Estates" Primarily developed due to the Country Club, that isn't vhy many of us today live on "the hill". As you Knov, Red Hill is a unique one-of-a-Kind area - a somewhat rural, mountainesque haven in the midst of a very rapidly growing city. It is for precisely that environment that many of us chose to buy our homes here. T never truly realized hov accustomed I had become to the sounds of traffic until I moved onto the hill and experienced the wonderful would of "quiet"! I quickly discovered that 1 really love being able to drink my colfee each morning while listening to birds chirping rather than cars passing. The size of the proposed development and hov many cars it may or may not add to the tra[f is passing my home isn't necessarily the issue. If it only increased that traffic by one car, that's one more than ve have nov and the thought that it could be five, or ten, or twenty, depresses me even more. I realize that our "rural" setting doesn't appeal to everyone • but it obviously is our choice or we wouldn't be appealing this proposed c.,u:.ge. Those that prefer to live in a more "modern" neighborhood vith aidevalks. serest lights, and through traffic, have many choices of location within the city. Those of us that prefer not to have very Cev. You, as nur etur~en ~ tie o a.a Ia~eu ri ci: a tre- mendous task in dealing with-the incredible growth we are now experiencing. I appreciate the fact that requiring improvements in new developments is one way of planning fot the future, and T Yespect your concern and effort in trying to maKe it all work effectively. In return, I hope you will respect our desire to be able to enjoy our homes as we have in the past. I realize that development is inevitable in undeveloped areas and that many times re-development benefits ': he community as a who Le, but I somehor doubt that the "community" really cares whether or not Sierra Vista becomes a through street. Those of us that live on it, do. We aren't asking that you prevent the development of an un- developed parcel of land - merely that you not ailov that development to unnecessarily infringe on our rights as current residents. Respectf ullyf,~,~~ J'W-~"~Y'O'0' Diane Staggs D.1 7862 Sierra Vista Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. .a'YO~ VINEYARD cry~~~ev ~ National `Bank a~, a~~~, i9,.,:; , ~y~T .; ~. . . August s, 19a7, fSi6 1fie Raacable Dennis Stout Mayor of Rancho n,.-•~•,•,~• P.O. Box B07 Rancho Cucasoiap, California 91730 Dear Mayor Stout: Soamtimr during tM month of August, the RaneM Cucaslonga C1ty Council will G dealing with a contrw . aial item which vill W ccalirg through tM mil as an appeal tN tM hameovrara of the Red Hill use hoping ttaC tta Council will ovrrturn a meant da- ciaion medr by tla Planning Cmraimion rrgacdiig Sierra Yiata Avenue. My vile and I live et 7928 Sierra Yiate which. ie the lint house on that street and is vhen Sierra Yiate presently deede:de di- • redly north of thr 5 or 7 acn pcpl planed Co W devalapd try Allma[k Co• We stand t0 aufur tM moat m property owners vith ceepet [o the Iona of approxLmuly 12 to 13 ft. accuse the entin front yard if, in tact, the City widmie sierra Vista Avenue on our aide of the street. A potion hm bran signed ny [he haarownwre vhinh M!•~..~.i ~ ._ - ~:yi.o~ua`I Ui WLIi my win eiW myself end hoe Wrn attadid to ACM appeel which tM Council vill be reviving. since the circulation of this ptitian, I have met with Brad Bullu. the City Plainer, and haw cevirwed CM proposed details and tM vuioue iapmvements bring racammrided f» made on the entire projrct. Mr. Bullet assured w that arty widening of the stress would be done on tM opposiu side accuse from our house and, would haw no affect an any of out frontage. With Chia 1n mind, ooupld viCh the aseursnn from tM city flat Chia la the ease, thin w vittdrew our namu from the ptition and taw no d- ditional objections to tM dewloprnt of tM property. fie would pceur some xrt of a cul de sac m appoerd to a attaight through shot rnnneeting Sieera Vista to Cauntey Club Deity. Howwr, ve are leaving Chet up to the City and thr tnarownere to argue over. I vould appreciate your paining thin information on to the propc indisiduala in the C1 ty. Yery tcu~ yaua, Sta~' R. President ownisnernt are[ FRB VINEYARD AVENUE PO a0%727 RANCHOaCUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91790 17NI 9e10177 ~~a ~~~1C~Yllll ~fl]["e ~ 1~I~(~rI'IECr]['I®1~ I~I~'I'If~ICI' I.O, s0X 33 . aa33 AMETHYST ST.. pAN01O cUCAMONGA 91701 (71Q Oa7@S33 TO: .Brad Buller, City Planner Rusa'MCGUire, City Engineer Tony Mize, Vice-President, Allmark and Anderson Realty .~/ FROM: Lloyd H. Almand, Division Chie£/Fire Marshal /7I¢ SUBJECT: Access into Tract No. 13541 ~/~~ DATE: July 27, 1987 After another review of the proposed tract, it is still the requirement of this fire district that access be provided as originally agreed upon during the Tech- nical Review Committee meeting, and aubeequently approved by the Eire district. other alternatives to entering the proposed tract • have been looked at, but all of those alternatives created a delay in what would be considered our normal emergency response time. The fire/medicel units serving the proposed area will normally take the route of San earnardino Road to Vineyard, to Red Rill Covntry Club Drive to the aooroved enr rv «„ tl.. «....« ,_.. other route will only build a delay into our response time. We have also, on occasion, allowed the use of gated communities with special provisions Eor entering during emergencies. These are normally townhouse or condo- minium type projects that are considered as clustered housing. They are private communities, have a home- owners association and are totally enclosed by walls or Eence^ and gates. These gates also build in a delay in our response. They are reluctantly accepted only bscause of the private community concept and the inherent security problems that come with these types of developments. Again, in ar. effort to emphasize the need for the most direct and unobetzucted route to this proposed tract, the plane as originally submitted and approved must be maintained. ,~ sag I::TEROFFICE MER J DATE AUGUST 7, 1987 PHONE • FROM CAPTAIN CILMORE RANCHO CUCAMONCA SHERIFF'S STATION R ECEIVED - TD BRAD BULLER, CITY PLANNER CIT/ OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PLAN NINO 7I`/!5'ON I~,) Camp d ]r a^a.a. i'i :: _ _ Rdl AY 0° 41g19itaILP-;? '1~IS~5i6 SUBJECT TRACT N0. 13541 The Aancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Crime Prevention Unit has once again reviewed Tract No. 13541 and ie requesting that access to this tract not ba changed from the access that was approved during the technical review phase of the projects development. The Sheriff's emergency vehicles serving the proposed project area would normally take the route of San Bernardino Road to Vineyard, to Red Hill Country Club Drive to the approved access to this tract. Any other route would only create a delay in our response time. The Aancho Cucamonga Sheriff's station hu maintained • excellent standards in responding to emergencia• in a minimum amount of time. To maintain these standards we foal that the moat efficient access to this tract is the one originally approved during technical review meeting. ~_ n ' U' EC/DG/h] cc: Rues McGuire, City Engineer Tony Mize, Vice President, Allmark and Anderson Realty ~l ~N100p 1,n M{{ ^ to C R,a FT FOR DISCUSSION PUR?OBEs Richard Fuercstian, 8331 Ut1ca, Rancho Cucaronga, stated the design fo East Avenue 1s set out in tM Etiranda Specific Plan. He was coot d Lhat tM Coalistion wants soaaething different and ranted clarif Lion on this ltsue. Brad Buller, C1ty PLnner, stated staff mould continue b use tht Etlranda Spec is Plan and could wke sure chat is approved is consistent with Etiwnda Plan. Nr. John Holt, 5335 nellan Avenue, Rancho Lutaaanga, stated back east it /s not unusual b f a have Wrned around so tM drivewy caakt in fraM tM buk, you coca reorient the houses b Put East Avenue, thent's no lac stating you h b caeN in free East Avenue. Chairsan McNtel closed tM Co~issloner Eaalrick coved adopt{ of tM rcsolutfon with tM isodlfications of added brick/rack tot front of tM Muse elevations and referral b staff tM debiled land a of moll plans for East Avenue. This cry include tM rcqutnrnt an additional landscape easeaMnt. In addition, auks tM 5 1/2 foot k moll along Etiwnda H1gh School a ~inlaaa• Of 6 fret. Co~tsstoner olstoy sacoMed tM aatton. Motion ws earned 4Y tM follaetng rob: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: 81AKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, ML1tl0., TOlSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: LgMISSIONERS: NONE .•.~• --carried 0. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AID TENTAIIYE TAACT 13541 - LANE - TM eve opaxn o a o eus s r s an n urea o and in tM Lov RestdenLlal District (2-4 dwlling units per acrc1, located north of Red N111 Country Club OMw at Sierra Y1sca - APN 207-411- 10, 207-080-O1 and 48. TM applicant has also t11ed a Tna Reapval Pent t. Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, presented tM staff report. Ne stated that a nueber of letbrs elated b tM pro~uL had been received. A petition signed by 12 haaMarners ezpnssed tMtr concern about tM connection of Sierra Y1sU b Red H111 Country Club Drive and tMtr proposal is that Sierra Wsb buoaR a cul-de-su. TM applicant has rccetved copies of tM letters end has nvteeed ths. Chat nun McN1e1 opened tM public Maring. Planning Coe~lssion Minutes ~?,ai=T FOR DIjCU~S1O~1 PURPOSES ~--: 20 July 08, 1987 ~~ C i-.r"~ FT Foz Dl~^;;~_;,-.,~V PU.~FOSES : Mr. Tony Niie, representative of CM applicant Allwrk, Inc., sUted • through tM two Design Review CoswitLee meetings most questions and probleam have been worked out. TMy agree with all tM conditions of tM staff report. Ne addressed tM concerns of Mrs. Dufrcse' letter regarding tM lot at Country Club and Sierra Yista W tM west specifically tM drainage problem is going W M resolved very adequaUly because tM amount of water that has Alstorically flowed down the hill into tM people's backyards is going W M virtually eliminated by grading and channeling tM cater out inW tM street or same minor surface water through specific easements. They arc obligated by law W control tM dust problem during construction. TM driveway Mrs. Dufrcse will be able W put to once they have tM street in and they will allow for Mr approach. M could not address the sidewik issue. As approve by stiff, they an required W put in tM sidewalk. It is his undersUnding they are complying with the preservation of tM trees Mrs. Dufrcse has. TMrc is sow landscaping out at tM approach for tM radius at Country Club and Slerra Y1sU which will caw down which is part of tM other proDlew W M addressed. On tM second latter frw tM nelghborMod residents, they corked very diligently to trying W look at all tM different whys 1n caking everyone comforUble in what tMY were doing. One of the thoughts ws W not go onW Country C1uD Drive, perhaps bring Slerra WsU down to tM botta and then create a cul-de-sac. This ws unequivocally dmnied by tM Foothill Fin District because of tM dlsUnce tram tM nearest street from tM nearest street W tM end of tM cul-de-sac; 1t violates every ordinance they have relative W that, then is gust no w4Y W approve that frw tM1r point- of-view. TMs want going back W tM original design which ws caster • planned and approved and that ws that Sierra Y1sU would ultiwUly run all CM way through W Red Hill Country Club Drive. As far as tM traffic flow that 1s occurring on tM hiil to that area, W tM south there is a Mgher density use ,Ming tM condominluw facing off tM Ht 11 ~~~ ~:~6 ••crf GUi riJ IIIRar ftrcmLS, Ln! solution may M afour- way stop at that intarseetlon o1 Slerra WsU and Red Hilt Country Club Drive. Basically, then an curves coring from both ways and a busy ingress-egress from CM condo proJact and you will have saw traffic on Sierra V1sU caking this a vary logical place W place a four-wy stop. In May 1982, Dr. Powers and tM Oufrcsa granted W tM owners of the property CM land that would cnaa tM ndtus neeMd at tM intersection W allow for all codas W M wt. In eachanga for granting that property, small strips of sand by CM developer can exchanged since tMy only needed 60 feel for tM right- of-way, This has been inUnded W be a street and has gone all tM way through the process through Untativa cap approval designed as a street. Regarding tM visability aspect, Mr. M1sa sUted that when those radius areas an developed with a street and all the U11 shrubbery that is now sitting in that area 1s eliminated, tM vtsabtitty will M much greater and the intersection situation ware afour-way sWp would solve all tM problems. DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ON• Planning Commission Minutes 21 July O8, 1987 ~~2 FC= Cl~..i:~c ~ .. Dr, Joseph Powers, 46412 Sierra Yista, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he has used this lot as an access to his residence for 26 years. He has no objectfon to the project, but feels that a through street was not an appropriate way of using this lot since it is a real hazard, It should not open onto Country Club Drive due to the speed. His major objection was tt being a hazard and feels the best use would be its use only as a fire road rather than a straight through street. Mr, Thomas Lindley, 8479 Canino Sur, expressed his concerns regarding Sierra Vista. This street was never meant to be a thoroughfare, it is only 20 feet wide. A cul-de-sad at the top (entrance to) the top of the project would be the Dest idea. The turn on Cad no Sur frog Sierra Ytsta is a very sharp turn now and with the increase of traffic flow on Sierra Yista, people will this as a through and will create a terrific traffic flaw problem. Mith regards to the suggestion of a four-wey stop at Red Hill Country Club Drive and Sierra Vista, tt teea Lhe developer is asking the City to alter the trafflc flaw on Red Hill to acco~aodate his development. This is one of the oldest neighborhoods in Rancho Cucamonga, changing the traffic to accaa~odate a snail development 1s culturo shack. Mr. LelaM Swanson, 7989 Sierra Vista, has lived on this street for 37 years. for 40 years, the strceL has been chained off or dirt blocked off to keep the residents from making it a thoroughfare which has been respected. The safety of the children and drivers would be put in jeopardy if it was made a through street. His recammendatlon/and • suggestion rrould be the entrance frw Red Hill Country Club Drive be brought up W the present cul-de-sac and made a south cul-de-sac for Lhe southern part of Sierra Y1sta. The entrance to the north end of Sierra Vista is an equally dangerous corridor, made moro 4angerous by the down hill turn. People who live them now are used to the turns and curves of Sierra Y1sta, to make 1t a through street .,morn n..,r';^•^^-ic's. _ ,. -r. Mr. Frank Luchinski, 8550 Red Hil Country Club Drive, objects to the project until the traffic problem can be solved on Red H117. Three or four serious accidents happen per year, with minor accidents happening onee or twice a month, He also stated the water would go into the ground, now with the roofs and driveways, the water will drain down, turn to the east and go to Lh! wash, but we will have four times as ouch water on a heavy rafnsWrm from the roof and the driveways. He suggested the area be considered fora park which was originally granted from Mexico City. It 1s a shame to wipe cut the hfsfdry in the beginning of Rancho Cucamonga; there Should be some mark of our history how Cucamongagg~~was developed. Mr. Steve di~sienbach, 7926 Sierra Vista, stated he believes the applicant has the right to develop the property with restrictions. He agrees the street going through would create a trafflc hazard to front of Dr. Dowers' home. Thera is limited police protection. Nhere would the exact widening of Sierra Yista would sUrt and how much of his property would he loose in front of his house. There is na objection to the improvement of the land, but feels the Comaission should glue some serious consideration to a cul-de-sac or Some other idea of preventing a _ flow of traffic on Red Hilt Country Club Drive. - - i Planning Commission Minutes 22 July O8, 1987' ~ ~~ 1-,~ 3 D R,y FT - DISCI,'SSIOi! ;aU^?CSE3 ONL Mr. Floyd Staggs, 7862 Sierra Yista, has no objections to the development on the other eM but would not like to see the street go • through. The area, Camino Sur and Sierra Vista, is now posted for golf cart traffic. Then is clot of animal wildlife and this would eliminate the animals. Sierra Vista is 1n deplorable condition now, full of potholes and is too narror. It will cost slot of coney to rebuild the street to handle the extra traffic, widening it would cause his lass of part of his front yard. Dam the line, assessments for sidewalks and traffic lights. He likes the h111 and the street the way it is now. Mr. &n Makel, 95% HMlock, npnsenttng the property owners of 7973 Valley Vista, the former owners of this property ax Kramer Brothers Nurseries clarified the reason wily the property was shut off was to restrict people from ceming into the nursery and stealing nursery stack. Retired from Foothill F1n District, he understands what the builder is confronted with, it is true that the access problem would present him a problem by cul-de-sating it at Red H111 Country Club Drive. There an ways this couid be mitigated, create a Cul-de-sac situation mitigated with tM ftn District Nhich would allow for the development. Then is access alto the possibility of an access free Monte Vista side as not W allow a thoroughfare fro Country Club all the way uD to Camino Sur and this should be considered. Mr. Larry ArcMnage, resident of Rad M111 Gauntry Club Drive, stated he does not have any reservations to the development of the property, but does not approve of Lhe idea Sierra Y1sta being a through street. . Ms. Laura J. Decks, 1908 Sierra Vista, has no objections to the development of the property. She does object the thoroughfare does present a problem whereas small children like to piay out in the yards. tf then 1s intnased traffic flow, this presents a potential hazard. This is a party area m.,, ~ t.".c C..-'' n, uywni is good, The Jeveiopment is W be 12 custom lots whicA would be then turned over and sold to whoever wanted t0 Duy the lots as they are. They have worked hard to develop the neighborhood to the value and the worth that it is. Ms. Ada Cooper, 8120 Country Club Dr1re, stated she has 11ved in Rancho Cucamonga since 1921 and owned the property since 1940. She does not abject the development, but requested the Coanlssion to be sun the water drainage problema an taken can of since then an more houses, more cement, and amore sidewalks then will be slot more water coming down. Mr, Duncan J11son, 8537 Chula Vista Court, resident 21 years, agrees with Mr. Powers then 1s a definite dangerous situation if Red Nill Country Club Drive was opened up with afour-way stop. There are Aro blind curves cooing into that point; then an slot of accidents occurring there already. Traffic backup due to the four-way stop will be an all-day, everyday occurrence. In reference to access to the alleyway, Monte Y1sta Drive, 1s there any driveways coming out backwards onto the alleyl Th1s 1s a very scull alley and would be quite dangerous if it was an access from tM new dwe111ngs. D ;,,~ ~ T Planning Commission Minutes 13 - ruTy'0~~,• 1987 1'14- DRAFT FOR DISCUSbION PURPOSES ONLY Chairawn MCNieI stated these all front on frog tM proposed street. • Mr. Jflson stated soaw:one suggested changing it and using it as a full access road. If that occurred, tM street is oniy 20 feet wide right now and this would wean cutting into property an both sides and Cutting into property values of quite a few hooks if this approach was accepted or used. Mr. Richard Avant, Yice President of Allawrk, Inc., stated they appreciate tM concerns brought forward but was soaw:what taken back since they Nde a strong effort t0 those taasediately concerned with tM probin of tM site. He is long aware of tM beautiful area and understands tM coaaaents of CM neighborMod yet feels this derelopaw!nt is a decent, seraightfonrard approach to this site. TMy have extended [M alley to allow Mr. Clssenbach without any fee or going through any legal hassles so M now un get into tM Dack of h1: property rather than off Chula Vista to support his particular problea. In regards to the drainage, there is not aaah absorption in tM soil and because of tM doaro-shape at tM top, tM water dispersed warywhere. Mt eh CMir design tM water is to De channeled toward tM street with tM exception of tM rear lots, Lot 5, 6, and 7. In ~eeting with Ns. Cooper, SM gave tht~ sane history about tM wall put up then stop 1t was put up was because of tM water prabin. TMtr proposal with Mr was t0 repave tM wall, to construct a six foot decorative type block wall which would enMnce Mr yard and not detract free tM view .of tM isountalns, they arc sensitive to that fact and vented tM Ce~tssion aware of that issue. In regards to Dr. Powers, there are legal problean involved and . a they arc working towards a solution. In regards to tM traffic probtee, LMre is a traffic proble~ now and arny cars are new existing in the proposed street onto Red N111 Gauntry Club Drive. Then is plot of traffic in and out o1 there rith two residents. Regardless of whether tM stroet goes through or not !! •--•^.d bcY„iu•e chose r45ide,^.t: cf uu Ln Those properNef to lower ~tM shrubbery, at least tM radius, W pick up another 20 or 40 feet of vlsab111ty around those curves. Regardless of what happens to LM street, this is only a recoiwendation to perhaps offset any praDlaau tM residents have observed. A four-way stop is another way of •tttgatlon. TMy have no oojectton to tM col-de-sae, as a costpagy or as a designer, but they do understand tM probleas with putting a col-de-sac, wMther it be at the north end or south end because of anglMering and safety problas. Because of tM narrowness of tM street of Sierra Vista, there would 6e problees to have fl re equlpeent try to yet in LMre because of eM roofs being of shake and turning around. This is probably why tM Firc District could not concur. As far as speed control, tM Coswission could Uke tM traffic out an alternate route or a lot by lot Dasis. They pro wiling to cooperate 1n any way. If soneone wants to pay f1, 400,000 for Lhe park, eMn they cart. TMy are asking the guidance of the residents and the Caaaalsslon and would like reach m a~alcable solution. ~~;:.aFr FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES O^:_.. Planning Coneission Minutes 24 July OB, 1987 17~ DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Mr. John Holt, resident of Carnelian Street, feels that the traffic . problem will continue until it is properly addressed as well as Foothill and Baseline where the traffic exists. He felt Mr. Grant offend an approach to slow down the through traffic which is the real problee, not necessarily where the street comes out. if a street 11ght, traffic bumps, guard gates, traffic sign is the answer to the problee instead of where the street comes in, this should be the maJor consideration. Mr, Tony Mize stated they have worked very closely with the staff and have been through Design Aevtew two times aM now have a staff recommendation for approval with conditions bgyond the standards conditions and they agree to meat all of those including offering, as the developer, to be amenable to a condition that would require the developer to create afour-way sWp. Chairman MtNtel stated he, too, was a resident of this area, and feels emotionally tied to the hill. He lives on Alta Cuesq between Camino stopasignaat Valley Yistareand Alta Cuestaswhichihas stowed udo~wnt traffic are svome things fo the design ofrthi~s streeti~h~h woould dlietiretraftfic~ the fact that there 1s a radical corner at Camino Sur and Sierra Vista on the north end. He understood the Fin DapartMnt's prospective. He questioned the dl stance now in the street. Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, stated that starting at Camino Sur where 1t meets Valley Vista, it is 1230 feet to the beginning of this • subdivision. Chairman McN1e1 stated that tram Lhe prospective of good planning, the street should ge LArough to Red Hill Country Club Drive and deal with .w- -`-i iiaiGr,. ii,e uereivper has agrees t0 put stop signs in, if required, which will slow down the traffic. It would not became an access road because tt runs Into Lamino Sur and then makes a left turn. This appears to be an opportunity and understands the feelings of the residents' feeling a sacrifice of privacy. He supports the continuation of the street. con~cursiowitheMrlsHoltfsaaoeaentstthatythesintersectloo isn't the problem, the trcfftc flow through Country Club Drive is the problem. Lom•ttsion Tolstoy stated ht did not realize that Sierra Y1sta was 1230 foot long and before knowing that M was fora double cul-de-sac Dut since the length of the street, because of safety precautions, the street should go through, Ne felt that afour-way stop would be quite appropriate, but questioned Lhe City Engineer M s caswents on Red Hill Country Club Drive. Russ Naguire, City Engineer, sUted there are two things to consider: the signal is being put to at Baseline and A1U Cuesta they are under design for a number of other signals which include the dual signal of • Planning Commission Minutes 25 July 08, 1981 D~,1rT 17~ r~^Z DISCUS~ICN PURE^=F': ~^l'; DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPCSES ONL Red Hill/Carnelian and Vineyard/Carnelian to improve tM access out. It . would appear appropriak in itt nature, Dut needs k carry through a review and approval process. Ne should rouk the through traffic through Baseline and Carnelian. Conwissioner Tolsky felt !M street should go all the way through and a study should be aside concerning afour-Way stop not only because of tM traffic sitwtlon but because of tM Dlirld corner situation. In regards to the water runoff, M questioned tM City Engineer. Russ Naguire, City Engineer, responded that it will be handled. There will De a full hydrology study, a 100 year skna protection will be required, and a trace out wMre they are dumping tM wakr can reasonably handle it without endanger anyone down LM street will be required before approval of tM map. TM hydrology study wilt have to address tM runoffs and its increased incremental {agacts. Coa~lssioner Chitiea felt that using Lots 3, ~, and 5 k exit onk tM alley is not a practical solution, therefore this should De eliminakd. TM Ida of a double cul-de-sac which might work in putting in soar higMr access gets a bit complteated, It might work but tM fact that ont part of tM cui-M-sac would be over 1200 feet long would not seem to M a safe situation. A four-wAy stop would slow traffic down and might solve part of tM problem. TM idea of offsetting tM street, putting an addlttonal eurre to it, pefiaps would discourage people using 1t as a through street. TM comarnts of Mr. Holt and Nr. • Naguirc regarding tM access to and from Red Nill Doth at Base Line and at Foothill will Mlp slaw down tM through Lrafflc. Mich tM developarni of Foothill plan, realignaxnt of tM access point which allows residents to get to and out but do not encourage other people to use this as a thoroughfare may Mlp to mitigate this particular intlrSection as rlt c~. sir tF,:r ;e;,p,.wnwad loan ng at the reallgnNnt of tM street, putting it through and putting a four-way skp sign there. Chairman MtNie1 staled the direction of tM Co~aission is k continue tM street through to Red Hill, k study tM possibUties and probabilities of a tour-way stop at tM corner of Red Hill and Sierra Vista, to put a curvature through tM now lots, change LM street so there's a little bend in it. He further explained that tM appeal process exists for those dissatisfied with tM issue. Russ Magutrc, City Engineer, stakd the developer is under tM obligation to Mar tM expense of installation of any further traffic control devices. Comaissioner Chitiea apved to adopt tM resolution with tM modifications regarding CM curvature, lnkrsactlon, tM continuation of tM street, aM 4ratnage. Goaasissloner Toisky seconded tM motion. Notion carried by CM following vote: C` RAFT . Z DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLl Planning Commission NT nutes 2fi July O8, 1987 1y7 Red NTII/Carnelian and Vineyard/Carnelian to isprove tht access out. It rrould appear appropriate in its nature, but needs to carry through a review and approval process. Ne should route the through traffic through Baseline and Carnelian. Coanissloner Tolstoy felt the street should go all tM way througA and a study should be wade cancernin9 + four-way stop not only because of tM traffic situation but because of tM blind corner sltwtlon. In regards to the water runoff, he questioned the City Engineer. Russ Maguire, City Engineer, responded that it will be handled, There will be a full pydrology study, a 100 year stop protection will be required, and a trace out wMre they are duaiping the water can rcasonabiy handle it without endanger anyone down tM street wilt be required Deforc approval of the arp, TM hydrology study will have to address the runoffs and Tts increased incre~ental iagxts. Cos~issioner Chltlea felt that using Lots 3, 4, and 5 to exit onto tM alley is not a prxtical solution, tMrefore this should be eliwtinated. The idea of a double cul-de-sx wA1ch eight work in putting in seek M9Mr xcess gets a bit coa>plicagd. It d t work but tM fact that one part of tM cul-de-sx wouid be over 1206 feet long would not sees to M a safe sitwtlon. A four-way stop wouid slow traffic down and eight solve part of tM problen. TM idea of offsetting tM street, putting an additional curve in it, perhaps would discourage people using it as a through street. TM caa~ents of Nr. Holt and Nr. • Maguire regarding tM xuss to and frog Red Hill both at Base Line and at FootM11 will help slow down tM through trafftc. Nith tM developawtnt of Footh911 plan, reallgneent Of tM access point wAtch allows residents to get in and out but do not encourage other people to use tAis as a thoroughfare nay Mlo to eitinar. «hi_ -cla, 4rtcr:<-ctlor ua weii. Sh! further recoawanded looking rat- tM rcaligmaent of tM street, putting it through and putting a four-way stop sign tMre. Chatrnan MtNiel staGd tM direction of tM Coswission is to continue tM stroet through to Red H111, to study tM posstDllties aM probabillNes of a tour-way stop at tM corner of Red Hill and Sierra Vista, to put a curvature through tM new lots, change the street so there's a little bend in 1t. Ne furtMr explained that tM appeal process exists far those dissatisfied with tM issue. Russ lYgulrc, City Engineer, stated tM developer is under tM obligation to bear tM expense of installation of any further traffic control devices. Coaaissianer Chitiea saved W adopt tM rcsotutton with the codifications regarding tM curvature, intersection, tM continuation of the street, and drainage. Cow•issioner Tolstoy seconded the sation. Motion carried by tM following vote; • Planr,ing Coccissfon Minutes 25 Juty 08, 1981 ~ 78 U • AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CNITIEA, EMERILK, MCNIEI, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ..... --carried Planning Coa~oisston Minutes f?~...- 27 July 08, 1987 179 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c~~++o,1 STAFF REPORT ~ , 4`I`I Q Jli V 197] DATE: ~~ly 8, 1987 T0: Chairnan and Members of the Dianning Comaission FROM: Brad Buller, City planner BY: Howard Fields, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENYTRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13541 - LAME - e ere opnen o a o cus on su vls on on acres of land in the Low Resident~~l District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located north of Red H111 Country Club Drive at Sierra Vista - APN: 207-411-30, 207-080-01 and 48. The applicant has also filed a tree removal peneit. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: • A. Action Re ested: Approval of a tentative tract nwp and ssuance o a egatlve Declaration. B. Protect Density: 2.7 dwelling units per acre C. ~urroundln L_and~Use and ZoMng; Aorth = -E'x s~i-ng s ng-7-TeTa~e~Ty residences, Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Existing Haiti-fanny, Medlun Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - Exlsting single family residences, Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Nest - Exlsting single fanny residences, Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) 0. General Plan Des1 nations: ro ec e - ow es en tai District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Median Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Nest - Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling 4,iits per acre) ~4D ITEM 0 PLANNING COMMISSIC :TAPE REPORT tentative Tract 13641 - Lane July 8, 1987 Page 2 E. Site Characteristics: The subject site Ts vacant and situated a e upper a eva ons of Red kiil, sloping fray north to south at approximately 5Z. The site contains approximately 12 aucalyptus trees, 4 hemlock trees, 2 Juniper trees with scattered grasses and sage bushes. !I. ANALYSIS: A. Generai: The proposed subdivision is on the largest renaming parole oolong the upper elevations of Red H111 area with lot sizes ranging from 10,020 to 20,445 square feet. Street improvements will occur on Sierra Yista to Red Hi11 Country Club Drive as part of this development, thus improving area circuiatlon. However, the completion of the proposed right-of- way for Sierra Vista Drive will create a noncom onaing situation regarding corner sideyard setbacks iminimw 27' from curb face is required per Development Code). The applicant should be conditioned to resolve this situation prtor to final mep recordation. • The existing 40' wide alley known as Monte Vista Drive will • remain providing rear access to lots 1 and 2, and also allowing an existing haex!awner continual access. B. Design Revlew_Cammlttee: The Design Review Canslttee (Toistoy, r c u er dr a Wally CnncT M...A t.~. prCT,JSai un ;;lay C1, ivtl/. At that tine, the Camaittee postponed the review of the protect until several technical issues could be resolved. These items included the encroachment of an existing residence into lot "A", access from Monte Vista across tot 2 and the provision for a turn-around area, and the encroachment of a black wall onto lots 5 and 7. The applicant subsequently submitted revised plans to be reviewed by the Design Rertew Coawittee. The applicant indicated that the garage addition in the east side of Sierra Vista had been illegally constructed. The plans also indicated that a turn-around area will be provided at the rear of lot 2. The Engineering Division reviewed the desfgn of the turn- around and determined that same modifications are necessary (a condition with an exhibit Gave been included fn the Resolution for ciarificatlon). In assessing the remaiMng issue, the block wall encroaching Into lots 6 and 7, the applicant has indicated that the wall will be demolished. ~PL PLANNING CDMMISStI ;TAPE REPORT Tentative Tract 13541 - Lane July 8, 1987 Page 3 • Based an this lnfonatton, the Design Review Coawittee recoweended approval of the protect suDtect to all technical issues being resolved by staff. Conditions are Included in the Resolution requiring completion of these item prior to recordation of the final map. C. Technical Review CoA,rittee: The Caewittee rcvlewld the protect propose an recaenen s approval subtect to an in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of existing overhead utilities (telecoewuntcattons and eiectrical) on the opposite (south) side of Red Hill Country Ciub Drive. fie fee shall be one-Ralf of the City adopted unit aequnt trees the 1engM of the protect frontage. D. tree Removal: As part of the developeN:nt package for this roc a applicant has submitted a Tree Reaoval Penh appllcatlon for the proposed removal four eucalyptus trees, four haelock Lrees, and a row of tunlper trees extending approxiemtely 90 feet. All of these trees are within the right-of-way for Sierra Wsta Street and will have to be reepved in order to construct necessary Street /mprovements. • The applicant 1s proposing to preserve the Mulberry and eight eucalyptus trees located elsewhere within the site. E. Environmental Assessment: Staff has capleted the initial s u an as a en ne .hat the brotect will net nrwy_nt .!!, i iyiiiii~anL adverse Impacts upon the envtronmint. Therefore staff recaeeends Mat the Caweisston issue a Negative Declaration in contunction wiM Me protect approval. lfI. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The findings listed on the attached Resolution are suppor e y e following facts: a. The proposed subdivision, 1n contunctlon with Me conditions of approval, 1s consistent w1M Me current Development Standards of Me City. b. The protect 1s adequate /n s/ze and shape to accaweodate Me proposed number of lots wiM1n the subdivision. c. Add/tlonal street and drainage improvements will be provided to make the protert c atlDle wiM Me surrounding area and improve circulation and drainage in Me vicinity. d. fie protect is consistent with Me General Dian and confons with Me Development Standards of the Low Reside-ttal District in which the site is located. 182 PLANNING COMMI SSIL TAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 13541 - Lane July 8, 1987 Page 4 • IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Da11y Report newspapee an notices were sent to alt property owners~'tw hen 3»Q' of the subject site. To date, no correspondence have been received for or against this proposal. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recoaaaends that the Planning Commission approve en ve Tract 13541 through the adoption of the attached Resolution with conditions, approve Tree Reawval Permit 87-45, and issue a Negative Declaration. It should be noted that the final map cannot be recorded until all conditions of the tentative nap, including successful Resolution of the encroachment/setback 15 sues, are satisfied. Respectfully su tt V Brad Buller City Planner BB:HF:vc • Attachments: Exhibit 'A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "C" - Detailed Site/Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Tn~ Rrr+".t ot.~ Resolution of Approval with Conditions -J.0.7 a ~. ~~ --' .~~ CITY OP Rt11~'CHO CL'CA~~IC~\~GA ~~~ av,,sa~, 18¢ RL• ~ l~ _..TT / S5~/ 11TLE~ _..5~ t.~~iu~ E~CHtDrI'~ /~ SG~CE i . ~ :; ;~; _ ~ .; ~ a -' _ ~ 9 \ °j R ~z ` -~ i ~ s Fes, ___ ~r+.~.~ a'i ~ e ~ BB 70 I e ---`- ` ~ ~ ~'~ ~ - i0 ~ N ~t y V Ib n I .. ,~.., t ~ ~~ ~ ~, .. ~~ r 2. >` ~ I ~~ i8 ! k, rI AIY .T ~~ v ~_ ~~ }} t ~ ~ i (' t~~~ ~ 5 ~ I` _~~ti~ t ....~.~.. i~,~.7. C 1 Wy t 7 M T = 23 ~nq, ~~ /'~ ~L~~Irw~i i4 \ _ ~ ~ 13 ~ J ~ .. AF ,~ ~~ ,7 h~L sLu, 12 P~8, 21: 33 n. ~JiaT'ION ~- ~ ~I ft. ~ ./ " q~ ~~p ~~.-1aYs"' ~ 1 ~','~ ~- ~ ~ '~ g c~rY or ~'CHO CL'CPuti10~\'GA ~"a'"r""~ avg., 18s G . ~° rre~r• %~s~/ TR'LE' ~- M..~o E.YNI01'1':, B n u cis or ~'CHO CL'CA1~10~\'C~ ~nvinc avLS~ocv 1B6 ~ '• 4 i ~~ _T r_ --==~ _ <-- ~i:t - i ` F ' Jk 1 `~ ___~_ ~ ,, ~ -- - a~. - .. ~ I ;. - --- '+. _ . -:.~ t If • ,. ~. ' ~t~i .~ .... ~ ~,,, . ~~ ~ d ~r~ ,.. +~ ~ ~s .~ r - , y~ ! r,,., N _: ~ ~~ r ~ _ ;' ~i y..,i,.'I 4~ ~~ ~.-'.. _-~~_-it'.~ G wi E)CHIOR~_ C < F, - = i -- _ ~ c~r,x -----, '; --~_. ~, _~_ J i r ` i_I. I. ~~ A j !t .._` ` ~__~f~~! `` ~ ~_.,\ _ _~~ ` w.~ o"'a r~ u G ~OF ~i~r or rrE~I: ,~ ~~~ RAl~*CHO CL'CA~vICs\'GA m2E~ , rpm ~MOV,yc _ PLANN4~'G DIVLSION ,],$7 E~cHIWT,~_SG\LE~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~cny~ STAFF REPORT ~~ y. • ~ ,>_ 4 ~ ~i,~ (j ~ I~> 1977 DATE: .August 5, 1981 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, Ctty Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13541 - Pea o e ann ng ss an s c son approving the development of a 12 lot subdivision on 4.3 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located north of Red Hill Country Club Drive at Sierra Ytsta - APN: 207-411-10, 201-080-01 and 48. The applicant has also filed a Tree Removal penett. I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that this item be set for public • ear ng on ugust 19, 1987 City Council Agenda. II. BACKGROUND: On Juiy 8, 1987, the planning Commission unanimously approve entative Tract 13541. During the Planning Camalsslon hearing, much discussion centered around the Droeosed connection of ~ Sierra risca co Hea HYII Country Club Drive. The Planning Comaisston felt that this connection was necessary to eltminate the excessively long dead-end street that currently exists. The area residents felt that a direct connection to Red Hi 11 Country Club Drive was not essential and, as a result, have appealed the decision of Lhe Planning Comeission. Res tfully submitted, Z~ Bra Bu e Ctty P anner BB:SM:vc 18$ duly 14, 1967 5~ . -REC.IVED- CITY OF RAtICHG C'.'CASIONCA PLANNING DI`/'S'GPI Dear Mayor Stout and Council Meabsrs, JU_~'J11~1 AM P{,~ 7i8~9~1a~1J;"_'•? ;3~8!dr5~8 A The encloaad appeal is bein6 submitted on behalf of the residents of Camino Sur and Sierra Yiata resarding tentative tract 13$41. Also find enclosed a sap illuatratin6 our proposed elternatire. Any questions resardins thin appeal or our proposed alternatite say be directed to Nichall• or Tom Lindley Jr•, 6479 Camino sur, 985-4432. • Thank you for your consideration. ~ ~` r v'i~' i ; /.~. ~~ ~ Michelle Lindley CITY Of RANCHO CIICAAIp1iG ADbNNJSTRATIpN JUL 1~ I981 wr 71~~ r 18g July 9, 1987 • Rancho Cucamonga City Council City Hall 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Tentative Trdct 13541 Dear Mayor Stout and Council Members: We, the residents on Sierra Vista and Camino Sur, wish to appeal the decision made by the Planning Commission on July B, 1987, regarding the proposed development oL the 4.3 acres or land located north of Red Hill Country Club Drive at Sierra Vista. We have no oDjsetlons to the development in general of the above rsieesnead parcel as vs agrs• that such development could increase Eha value of our homes. Ws do, hovevor, object to the proposal that Sierra Vista become a through serest for the following reasons: 1. The homes on ;hs wee aide o[ 5lerra Vista ar• currently faced with the diaadvantagee of having no view, and an Edison company easement vleh power lines cutting through the vest sid• of our lots. Therefore, • vs feel the only real value co those homes on the vest side is the tact Chat there is very limited tratf is on Sierra Vista. 2. Both Sierra Vista and Camino Sur aze posted to allow for Golf ra r~ ~.. !!!: -"d --::roi u: i.i:e resiaents on these streets who aro mambarsroC the Country Club do traverse these streets regularly in their stover moving golf carts, a fact chat all of us on thv street are aware and cautious o[, due to the narrowness of existing streets. 3. Several o[ the [amiliee on Sierra Vista have small children who would be exposed to ehs additional dangers o[ the increased tra[fic on a through street. 4. The Sngrsss/egress for this proposed project is anticipated to bs from the south end of the davalup- ment aL Red Hili Country Club Drive however, with the majority of major shopping being to the north on Baseline and 19th attests, it seems logical that it Sierra Vista were a through street the new rsaidents would drive north on Sierra Vista rather than south to Red Hill Country Club Drive, then north on Va1L Vista ~[ A16a Cuesta. 5. Even though only 12 Lots sr• proDosed, moat [amities today have a minimum o[ 2 cars, (or poaslDly 3, with a teenage driver) which could conceivably nearly double the current traffic flow on Sierra Vista and Camino Sur. We have lived with 't he potho Us and eroding surfaces of these streets for sours time but the possible additaon of ." 190 Rancho Cucamonga City Council Re: Tentative Tract 13541 - page 2 traffic from this proposed development would further • contribute to the existing erosion. 6. Current city requirements for residential streets require a 36' width of paved street in addition to curb, sidewalk and pa[kvay area. Since Sierra Vista and Camino Sur have only a 20' width of paved street, opening Sierra Vista to through traffic will, we feel, create a hazard due to the abrupt narrowing of the street from 36 feet to only 20 feet in width and the City's Engineering Department has stated that they have no plans to widen the existing paved surface on Sierra Vista or Camino Sur. Sierra Vista currently dead-ends at the north end of the street and is accessed only via an approximate 90 degree turn onto Camino Sur. Due to this configuration, a member of the Planning Commission agreed that traffic raced a much more serious hazard in accessing the proposed development from the north than from the south. The development company stated that they Intend to widen the entrance aE the south end of their development, remove some existing tail shrubbery to provide better visability, and agrees to install the necessary signage to create a tour-way atop at the entrance to their project and Red HS11 Country Club Drive • The Planning Commission seemed to have no problem with the idea of leaving Sierra Vista a closed street other than for access of emergency vehicles. That being the case, ve would like to propose that an alternative plan be adopted to provide access for emergency vehicles while stilt :es tricting the floe of through traffic, by means of a cul-de-sac or similar configuration at the north end of the proposed new development with a crash-gate access for emergency vehicles. On contacting the Foothill Fire Dlstcict, they voiced no abjection to the Ldea o[ crash-gate access and, in fact, such access has been in existence at the north end oC Sierra Yista at the entrance to the private road for many years. The development company does not plan to build on, or occupy their proposed sub-division, and stated at the Planning Commission meeting Chair xi llingness to work with the existing residents. Therefore, we hereby respect[ully request the City Council to either overrule the Planning Commission decision, oc uphold the decision with the revised condition that Sierra Vista remain a closed street while pcovidirq emergency vehlcl~ access,thereb protecting the value of the existing homes, reducing the risk of accidents, and maintaining the more rural environment that the existing residents value so highly. we thank you £or your consideration in this matter " tq1 • .~ ~~ i~.~ Name Name' r~~ ~_ a~ V~~ ~ , --~ 0~ ', ~' i.~ ,Yams dame, b .•!~~ L/ 7~ ~J ~ Tres J y(ne 14Z 2 L~ 111 Address ~~~ (~F~1)II ^. c~ ~f~ i Address Address Address Ad dress p~ X70 ,~{{JJ (."~tit« r~ ~ ..7 p1L!/L/ ~ Address fi'~70 r _.. / . _ ~wJ / A d d ress / ~ p I CJ ~eJ. ~^ `,e,~,~q / J~ L/rA/.~ ~ , ~~ Ad d r ess ~ C ~ A 70'1 .SInAA,ti ~IAn~ Address BY 79 Ca.„ ,,,~ S aaa.e.. ~79 ~d•.vi... .> ~~ Address > . ~/ i ice" ~~ Address' .~=~ ~ ~1~>/CI .CG ~.CLL Address Address Address ~ '~~ I i ~ /, ~-. %~ti~ ~ " Address i r % 'i Address // Address Rancho Cucamonga City Council Re: Tentative Tract 13541 Rancho Cucamonga City Council Re: Tentative Tract 13541 i Name c, Name L .Y.•~_ L1J.I.1L.L~1t YK Nam• I Namlr' b ~ . . Nam• , ' ~ ~M ~. 44 L'a~ti vti _? ~~y+2! Na • Nam• Nam• N ~ ~~ .,~aa ~ Name Name Name Nam• :Jame Name Name Name • 7~y~~es ~.,~ l~~ ~~ 'Address 7y 7V .~i~. •ea /~.~_ / Address / 7~JY ~cLi~2 7 ~lL~ Address 7c':55 Cicna~, l~~~h ~ Address Addrese~ Address//,JJ ~~ L ~l~ ,4(.rh52 /~.~~ . Address ~1~ ti r~ - Addrns Address ~~ 7 10 €~~A ,_ U/ SiA Address Atldress Addzeae Address Address Address Address Address Address " ~,~13 -- :_ - ~ _ ~~j ~A J __ _ I a ~ t V-~ ~ e - \~4 - +'. '- -- - ~ -! .. ; ~ -- -• -~--~ a. 3 es ~o i It ~~.,, Ic ~x ~-' -gr---e s ~ ~*} ~ we•. ' rrN~~ ~ ~~~ ntYN t ~ • ~y2 7 I ~ i ~~ ~ II 3 . _ y_ ^ ~r rMN t n.aw .:r ~wr ~y.-L - {1NM I + i ~~ e ~ t ~ 1 zz isc -n ~ _.. ryN t7 t,~ ..w`rN II +~!tif.T ivlt °-'.$~::' ~ I 1 ,.mar ~+ rrr; ~ r _ :•~•~ 14 13 12 Ae'L YLL ~L:. MH. ZI: 3J t YA..v~ r~~'1~ /I `~ ~ "~ ~~. ~ 4 M.3a2~~ :! ~l car,~~r**sr(~Royyr'-~~ T /~'+~,,~~ ~ '^,~ L<L1L\T6rL-iV ~r\1'11~KiYl P- 4YNtf~Y: Mn~1f1N ~~ 7RT„E~ ~~.E'~ M.IP 1 - ': ', ~ - - --~ 3 I1 3a ~~ 73 ~~~ ~ ~.. ~_ _ ;' i_._ y____ ~ ~ rb= a~ S a ___ ~ ~ ~d! 71 ~ I t¢r •~N ~ 7 ~ 3 y. ~YN~~ ;, ° es m ~ R:•• ` to ~~ •-u:-- i-Q -•---• .A/ aN i ° Is is a . ~ 1 ~ a I`I' g~--- ~ ~s ~ ~, - }~ _~;~ ~ .rN, ~ nwN f i ~ II T 1 17 : q 11 011 a -•- ~. •_ R L ~ .MN 1i OWN .T ~~#. ~.y MN !T ~ I ~ ~ ~ I i ;! is ~ li ~J~ ]~. I 1~ :.I~ .~ erNii 7 111 ..• t'.iil~' ~'!,^~. wu .r v i'.~ a ; 1 ~ ....a7~/ ~~ M.0~2 ~ MI/ ~ r•'I.Y •:~ri 14 13 ~ 12 ~ AfD F•Ll S13. M8. ii.'33 r- ~~ rTJi-fON ~- ~ Y.rir s /1 - end ~`",r~r~.s5~-- ,~ o AAe ~b~~ i ti.~ /~'~ h r\ 1 ~`r~ ~r yr~.1'f1~1M r n '~'~~fi ~7 '~'M.~A CI n+ 1 ~~ r • . _ k _ ~_ ,3 ~_ _~ ~._~- . - - 1 4 ee ,i i ~ ..:.. -:~ I i 89 -p 1 / Z ~ .r ~ ~ IG 19 ~- _ Q .~~N ~ '~ .NN ~ ~I ~ ~ ~a ,s _~y~ I ~-- ~ ~ i r 7 ->i ,~~ _. nqw I new ~ ~T ~~ 1~1 ~A J /..__ ~ ~ MN 1~ 1 ~~Zi rlnN , .r v2 ?~~ - '-1-'• .W. .X~6CI~ r ~.r/..~i 14 13 ~ li RFD i0.L 3L3. ,~ MD.21.73 n ''p1fI0N {{~~ ~^ 4 sy r LOIN; i3 K ~~ . . 9 i /~ 3-~ ~ ~ ~, a M3aZ ci-rY or ~'cxo cL~c~~a~ PL~Mvtr ^ pry' ~ ~ q T1TTF~ 7I.l3- M,1yD July 17, 1987 • Re: Tentative Tract 13541 Dear Mayor Stout and Council Membe[s: Regarding the appeal requesting that Sierra vista not be made a through street, I would like to express my personal feelings in addition to the reasons stated in the appeal. Although "Red Hill Estates" primarily developed due to the Country Club, that isn't why many o[ us today live on "the hill". As you know, Rad H111 is a unique one-of-a-Kind area - a somewhat rural, mountainesque haven in the midst o[ a vary rapidly growing city. It is for precisely that environment Chat many of us chest to buy our homes here. I nevec truly realized how accustomed I had become to the sounds of traffic until I moved onto the hill and experienead the wonderful world of "quiet"! I qulekly discovered that I really love being able to drink my coffee each morning vhii• 1l stenin9 to birds chirping rather than cars passing. The size of the proposed dwelopment and how many cars it may or may not add to the traffic passing my home isn't necessarily Lhe issue. It it only increased that traffic by og car, that's one more than vs have nor and the thought that it could be five, or ten, or twenty, depresses ee even mon. I reallz• that our "rural" setting doesn't appeal to everyone . but it obviously is oug choice or we wouldn't bs appealing this proposed change. Those that prefer to live in a more "modern" neighborhood rith sidewalks, street lights, and through traffic, have many choices of location within the city. Thos• of us that prefer not to have vary few. rnu. ." ~ _„ -ap..~.uiacives, ar• raced with a tre- mendous tasK in•deallnq,viEh the incredible gcovth ve are now experiencing. I appreciate the Cact that requiring improvements in new developments is one way o[ planning foe the future, and I respect your concern and effort in trying to make it all work effectively. In return, I hope you will respect our deaita to 6e able to enjoy our homes as w! have Sn the past. I cealiz• that dwelopment is in evitaMl• in uedeveloped areas and that many times re-development benelits the community as a vnole, but I somehow doubt that the "community" really cares whether or not Sierra Vista becomes a through street. Thos• o[ ua Chat live on it, do. We aren't aaKing that you prevent the development of an un- feveloped parcel OC land - merely that you not alloy that development co unnecessarily infringe on our rights as current residents. Respsctf ally, Q.~.or..t.. Y~4.~Y Diane Staggs OO 7862 Sierra Vista Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. 1q-( • CITY OF RANCHO CtiCA.'KONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: October 21, 1987 T0: Mayor and Meslbers of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tam Grahn, Assistant Planner ~iGa.Np~ :9 3 ~~ r a.. s F;j p Z Uu i 19i7 I SUBJECT: TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 87-43 - BENCOMO - The appeal of the ann ng om ss on s ec s on enytng the removal of eleven (11) Eucalyptus trees located in the rear yard of 9538 Gala Avenue - APN: 202-111-69. I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recamsends that the City Council receive all npu on a proposed Tree Removal Pern1t applltatlon. If, after receiving all public testimony, the City Council supports the decision of the Planning CoamNssion, staff recomaends that the City Council deny the appeal of the applicant. • I[. BACKGROUND: On July 27, 1987, staff dented the applicant's rcpuest o r'~-evev all 09 the existing eleven (11) Eucalyptus maculata (SDotted Gum) trees located in the rear yard of 9538 6aia Avenue, due to lnconsistencles with the intent of the Tree Preservation Ordinance (see attached letter). Following staff's denial of the application, the applicant appealed to the Planning Carissian. On Septesber 9, 1987, the Planning Commission conducted a hearing on the tree Removal Pern1t application. At that sleeting, the Planning Cosntsslon deterni ned that the Dropoted resgval of the ti eea uiu not contorn to the criteria of the Tree Preservation Ordinance as the intent of the Ordinance is to preserve natural aesthetic resources which heip define the character o~ the City. They explained how condltiont are placed upon developers to replace Eucalyptus windrows and reestablish the windrow character when the removal of the trees is necessary far the installation of improvements associated with a development, as was the case to this tract. The Planning Commission indicated they would support removal of selected trees; however, the applicant insisted on removing the majority of trees to accomaodate an RV Storage area, patio, and swiassing pool. As a result, the Planning Camission den led Tree Removal Pernit 87-43. Attached are copies of the Planning Comaisslon staff report and minutes. R;g ~Otful~b ed, i er City tanner BB:TG:te Attachments: Letter of Appeal, September 21, 1987 Planning Canmlisslon Minutes of September 9, 1987 Planning Cosmlisslbn Staff Report of September 9, 1987 *;~R • l ~t • Ki'•. _. • EECEaM~D ' CIiN Of RANCHO CDCAYORGA -~. City '.;ouncll ADMINISTRATION c iC1:: :~.on s Teti cia _eacoro SEP 211981 .-._. ,-.on~el -- .re= .. .oval psrm~ t a~_~? ~~"~'"'--,~~1~~1R~/ yy '~ ~/ln ^i~aoe .; cceoc tia 3 letter as nett ce to arceal tk'.e _ _sion ree.cha3 by the ?1<-~.nning Comci sst on raga rating -- -~ronal ?err,it A7-di •xhlch recuFSte nex'mission ~ r~nove ~' Ducal m tus _rees `rom-our rear n^nnerty. ecause of the aaount o•.' trees and because o_° *.'heir lorz;ion or. our nr~narty, we .eel t'n2c the treee r resent as undue 'nzrashin ko ua as homeowners. 4'e also 'Deli eve :cat the trees do not allow for econo.^.:Sc en;,ovear.t of our rear nronerty. (P.g ste*,ed u.uier Sec ticn .-'/~ri teria of the ~Pree Yreserva.tion Crdir.2nce.) :.di±tlonal in_fornation regarding tY.is annea~ will he aveila'ole at the City Council aeeting. (':"ne rtz,j on ty • oP our ?aoer~vork hag been gubmitied to tY,e CSty's Pla :^ir.g ~epPrt^ent.l ('ur am=al _ee o3 ..+2b.Oq is attache,i. 1a9 DRAFT FoR D13CUSStON PURPOSsEa OM.Y aiph Nanson, Deputy City Attorney, suggested a cash bond could 6e piecented if the landscaping is not installed by the rise of the c tificate of occupancy. Chat n McNtel stated the site-line view froc the freeway this cou16 not be een. Losslssio er Chitiea stated shifting the Durden t0 the Redevelopcent Agency fs t realistic with all the protects. Corecissianer lstoy stated the freeway should present a goad icage of the City. Chairsan Mc Niel o(lAned the public hearing. Mr. M1nar suggested he additional landscaping 6e put in now and they agree to de sale tree along the right-of-way. NT11 the City 6e able to work socething out wit CalTrans and the City aNintaTn Tt7 Russ Maguire, City Engin stated the only way it is going to go in is if the goversaental agency uarantees Calirans that they will saintain it for the nest twenty years. Cocoissioner Chftlea coved to pprove Ites L with the sodificatTOns including the Ungwge if the la scape was not installed, sale type of • cash Dond shall De placed. Case stoner Tolstoy seconded the cation. Mott on carried by the following vote. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CNITIEA, TOLS Y, BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, MCNIEL Y.CCS. CuiTiiboIUNLRS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ites K - Cocsissioner Chitlea coved to approve t Tentative Parcel Map, Corsaissioner Ecerick seconded the cotton. MO on canted by the following vote; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CNITIEA, EMERICK, 6LAKESLEY, IEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ' " " ' • * --carried N. APPEAL OF TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 81-43 - Appeal of staff's decision eny ng a rcsow o e even ucalyptus trees lrcted in the rear yard of 9538 Gala Avenue - APN 202-111-b9, Planning Comaission Minutes -17- SeptecDer 9, 1987 aao DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Conwissioner Tolstoy, because Of a long-tile association with th' applicant, asked penaission to abstain and was absent from the public hearing. Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner, presented the Staff report. Chairman~MCN1e1 opened the public hearing. Mr. and Mrs. Ronald Bencaao, 9538 Gala Avenue, Alta Lase, appellants, stated the trees restrict the use of the Dack yard and maintaining a lawn is quite difficult. Mr. Bencamo adtlrcssed M s concerns relating to issues of obUining usable land for the backyard, Having a swiwing pool built, the size of the yard to warrant so many trees, and futuro wind protection. Mr. Carl Sartaga, neighbor of the Bencomo's stated his support of the tree removal. Chalrwn MCN1e1 closed the public hearing. Chairwn McN1e1 stated the tree ordinance is for the protection of all trees to preserve the rural character of Rancho Cucamonga. CerU1n conditions are placed upon developers to replace tees to wintaln the character of the City. The obvert is to attempt to preserve saw of the things thet tykes Rancho Cucamonga what it ts, a nicer place to lire. He stated they didn't want to lose Lhe concept of the windrow. There may be a possibiitiy of reawving a tree or Lwo. Coewiss/onlr Blakesley sUted he concurred with Chalrwn McNtel and felt removal of one or two of the tttes would be n.rw!•_s?".?:, Cowissioner Emerick stated lie was impressed by the fact that the back yard was small upon his inspection and felt that forcing trees in the boo kyard of sM11 lots would have to have second consideration. He thought that CM lot was too small td accawodate a windrow of Eucalyptus trees and the trees did interfere with the the Intended use of the backyard, including a swiwing pool. These trees grow t0 60 - 80 feet in hel9ht aM twuid impede the view and sunlight in CM yartl. Mrs. Bencamo stagd she felt the removal of two to three trees would not make a gnat deal of difference. They would like to see all of tree trees removed. Cowisstoner Chitiea stated since the appellant was not in agttewnt with working with staff fora small number of trees being removed, Ms. Chitiea agreed an integrity of windrows must be wtntained, The reason the flood control area went in where it did was to protect the bows so the developer could develop tree tract. That's why the windrdws caw out initially, The tttes art theft for the vfsual effort to maintain the • character of the City. Du nning Cowission Minutes -18- September 9, .987 ~y DRAFT • FOR DISCUSSION PURPO>3E!J ONLY Mrs. Bencomo stated she felt that the situation could be acre easily assessed if the Caimaissidners could actually see it and felt since no ane has seen it, their request has not been taken into serious consideration. Coeaissioner Blakesley moved to deny the appeal, Commissioner Chi ti ea seconded the cotton. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMIISSIONE0.S: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COIMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: CCVMISSIONERS: EMERtCK, TOLSTOY Caewissioner Emerlck clarified his "Abstain' vote for the reasons previously stated. • " • " • • --carried DIRECTOR'S REIOMT . P. HIGH RISE OIIDINANCE - FOOTHILL FIRE DISTRICT Chief Lloyd Almand of the Foothill Fire District presented a slfde demonstration and how the Ordinance might affect site development and archi tlc t. Q. ANTENNA STUDY/87-88 NglK PROGRAM Brad Buller, City Planner, prey±nted the staff report. After discussion, CM Planning Cae~ission agreed with the scope of work and recoe~ended a low priority IV. AOJOURMRIEIR Motion: Moved by Chittea, seconded by Tolstoy, unanimously carried, to adjourn, Planning Commission Adjourned - 1:25 a.m. Dlanning toeaoission Minutes -1~9- September 9, 1987 3p 2 CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA c~~,++o . STAFF REPORT ~ ~ "~,^ y~~~r } p F'. ~ Z y GATE: 'September 9, 1987 197 T0: Chalroun and Members of the planning Camnisston FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tao Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 87-43 - BENCOMO - Appeal of staff's ec son eny ng a reogva o e even (11) Eucalyptus trees located in the rear yard oC 9538 Gala Avenue - APN: 202-111-69. I. BACKGROUND: On June 26, 1987, Ronald Bencomo submitted a Tree emova ermlt application 1n accordance with the provisions of Ordinance N276 (Tree preservation Ordinance). The request was for • the removal of eleven (11) Eucalyptus msculata (Spotted Gum) trees located 1n the rear yard of 9538 Gala Avenue, south of 19th Street and east of Amethyst Avenue. The proposed removal of the trees was deniedvthe rrequest asndinconsiste t swlthtthe Treetipreservation Ordinance. II. ANALYSIS: The request pertains to eleven (11) Eucalyptus trees >~iaf-were repoved and potted prior to the submfttal of a Tree Removal Permit. On June 12, 1987, Code Enforcement informed the applicant that that' were in violation of City Code by removing the subiect trees w/thout a Permit and required that the trees be replanted in their previous location (see Exhtbtt "F"). Staff has carefully reviewed the Tree Removal Permit application and conducted a field lnvesilgatlon to evaluate the condition and location of the trees. Based upon the information presented, staff denied the Tree Removal Permit as inconsistent with the criteria of Ordinance 1276 (see Exhlblt "B") to the following areas: ~ 1. The trees were required Cy the City to conjunction with Tract 13066, and Tree Removal Permit 85-22, to replace the original Eucalyptus w!ndrow that was removed far the Installation of roadway improvements and storm drain facilities in the tract. 2. Overall, the trees are generally healthy, although several appear to be dead due to their removal and subsequent lack of adequate waterlog, ITEM N PLANNING COlNI SSION STAFF REPORT TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 87-43 - BENCONO September 9, 1987 Page 2 3. The removal of the trees in not necessary at this time as the trees do not present any danger to existing structures or improvements on the property. In their appeal, the Bencomo's cite future improvements in their back yard as ,justification for removal. The Tree Preservation Ordinance does allow for consideration of tree removal which allows economic enjoyment of the property. Staff feels that the windrow could be retained 1n a manner than could accommodate Lhe proposed improvements. III. RECOMI~NDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Camlission deny rce emova application based on inconsistencies with the Tree Preservation Ordinance (Ordinance f276), and require the replanting of the eleven (11) EucalypWs trees. Respe ally submitted, B r City lann BB:TG:te Attachments: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B' Exhibit "C' Exhibit "D" Exhibit 'E" Exhibit "F" Exhibit "G" Exhibit "N" Tree Removal Permit Application Tree Prlserratton Ordinance Removal Criteria Site Plan Approved Landscape Plan Photographs Letter of Wolation Letter of Denial Letter of Appeal • • n U ~q' City of ~ Cucamonga z ~_ ~_ _~ Z Z Qz J a Z W ~: J u z C~ L U LL Z W 2 V Tree Removal Permi' DEVELOPMENT ~~'~> QENERAIINFORMATWN OIFMOIIiTNANOTREES OR BO't1NEAR FEET OF WINOROYt Ordinance No. 276, pertaining to the preservation of trees on private property, requires loaf no Derson remove or relocate any woody plants in excess of fifteen (15) feet in height and having a single trunk circumference of fifteen (t5) inches or more antl multi-trunks having a circumference of thirty 130) inches or more (measured twenty4our 12p inches tram ground level), wiMOUt first obtaining a Tree Removal Permit from the City. LOCATION OF SUBJ ECT SITE: NAME.ADORESS, TELE~'\PHONE OF APPLICANT: ~cu+s\ci Cln[\c Limn !,1'a ~qi C~e1 Le\ t'\+rc ~.. ~' t ~~l i `c.+~d. C!\ \\1l\\ ~9.~\-~\("~'.~ NAME, ADDRESS. TELEPHONE OF PROPERTY OWNERpf other than app;icantl: REASONS FOR REMOVAL (attach necessary sheetsl: PROPOSED METHOD OF REMOVAL: ~ ~ a '~~c+r ~u~ . APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE: 1~iCrha90 DATE: (/vC_l'O~ T.i~ ii?~ This application shall include a plot plan indicating location of all trees to be removed and retained. The speues, number, and sire of the trees to be removed ;ball be so designated. If a tree is diseased. then a wntten statement from a licensed arborist stating the nature of the disease shall be regwred. n rvn - t:tltala ^ APPROVED DENIED 7 ~. By' / RealOns~ ~ wl.Iwv4f/aI~ _ Date; // ~~A ~ /~~ Notdmahon of application shall be gwen to property Own~wlthin a three hundred toot radius ten c poor to approval If no aDPeals are received, then the permit shall become effective ten 1101 days from date of action This approved tree removal permit is valid for 90 days frdm the data of hnal map records or bwiding permit issuance, whichever comes first. Should applicant fail to remove Me trees within the day period, a new permit shall be required. unless an extengwn is requeste0 fourten (141 days prior tc ex~ ~a'ion of the permit, 1 . Condition of the trees? y. Proximity to an existing structure orinterlerence with utility services. 3 . Is there any conlliot with proposed improvements? (Streets, building pads, walls) 4. proximity of other trees iH the area. 5 . ElfeCt of tree removal on the aesthetics of the arse and the public Health, welfare and ae}ety. 6 . Can the tree be preserved by pruning or relocation? 7. Do the trees constituteasigniHCant natural resource? tl Are the trees required to beII ~p~reservlIatl'' by any specific plan condlNon off approval or histjQ~ric lantl• mark designation? ~~ht1VIN {^/~7 ~•~~ ~I411~0 11h ~~IIIA•ts 9 Is an arbonst required? DECISION: DATE: E1fAtUA3ED 11 a06 , , „ 0. Ausdatd witll • ltapaasl tae Dnm~et_ tiAra e, applttatlaa tar a itw s~osal rarm)t ~t~t~lls~ytNt~ O ~ it0~°~~(5) qlb ~~ 1. IIPN raNipt of nr appllNtlm, tlla Ctq PLmlar a dasiplaa etrR t4 tlr silo and araiuaq tha appliNtlan on tIN tluia of tM ~ ~ arltstlu . ~,:: . . ~ 'I1N ecnditlal of ttr teNW wIN eNPNt eo dtfNN, dulgr of ceWpss of all ar M portico of tM tsN(sl, Proximity to sn axtstin~ atrllatun, ar iotaetaranN aHN utiliq aseHeut b ~ 'tAa naaNa(q to ramova a trN ip ardor to Nmttruct tmpraVamann wMaq aliotr ~ aaalomb ukymaat at tlla P~1n ., • a. aKaetramosa) walld~ M m etr aa~ta~ballfM~d Nreaetar of fir arN and elr ProPUt7 Va41sN d. lI1NUlsr ar not' t0a ratmru d tpa teaaW b llOt Yvl~1r~ 1~a1/amatlb Mltt~n fIM PNt Y ttd11 l flood aantrel s urntr....e.~r~._... ' ~ ". ..~. ~ 1. a. NMtlMe or not ttM trN could tla Praarvad qr prwin~ and DnOSr maintslunN a ralaoatian nttlae than ramovaq t. 1YIMtINr or not f11oA Iraafa) aanseltut~.a sl~ni!-aant natural raaOla{y o! tAa Citjry' up . !<. t111attre a not soon trap w raquiead to W prasarrW bt an • spaoitk plan, community pWy candidan of appeoval, a dNlplaeton u Nstarfo lalldmaek. °~7 .J J I n p • i!i j~l 3 e li~~~ j ~ ~ f ,- I :.! f , ao3-~, ! ! ~ I ~ ~ i~ t ~ W ~aj~` .i . I ~ ! i'v~!!, IF I ! to I Fi~! _ !s I i j1 fill ; s, - j t '~ ~ ~3. ~~~i i!j .p it } i, ~ I ~t~ ei i. 1 e . r,i ! I! p, ~ \ _`._i == _~_~_y 111, ,; '-t"---- ----_ _~ 1 ~r--_---a X1.1 , I .a.. ! li~j q,i --- ~,.,. ~ I ~~ -~-~~I I 1 I l I ~I ~ ' f ~ _ _ ~. ! I ~ „ i ~ I b ~ ~~, i+ 1 o-_ I ~.~ : ~ C I f~ ~ I ~ . S + \ 1 e "`~ II e ~ _ ~ \ h~ f ~ I 1 C ` w ~R- n. ~ ~ .S ` L 2 i ~ t. E.._ annou ~ ~ ~~ ~i I~ 1,• \ G .. a ,~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~__ ~i ~ ?t `\ \ _ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ a I I ~\ ~i A ' a~. ,+ •• s ,~ } r =c . L ~ y +-~ ~ = . 1 . ~, •~ N ~ ~ ~~ r I /. ". i ~ i i it ti ~ M1 u a ~ Y n .. . ,, z. . Z 1 i. r s~~'1 ~/ ~ ~. _., ~'" ~ ~i;K~'d'KC~" ~~ t~~ n ~ ~~~ }:: ~_ __~ .M. •~ .~~ t£ .. ,ay.,`~{~rY~~v;~~~~~ y i Y*"°'1~9. ~' ,.,;P '. ~- ~ ,Y N .~. ~ h f........ ,t r ~ ~ ~ ~_.. ~'k r ~ $ .Y f _~ -*? CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ;~~ ' , June 12, 1981 ---- i -~- ~---- - • ---- - i ; _ ~_ Pm Oee em mT, e..ao o,m9a C,Ybn{, 911]0. (T1919n•1 Ronald and ~etf cia Bencomo 9538 Gala Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Oear Mr. and Mrs. 8encaaq: Prior to development of your tract, the M111-M1111ams Caagany was required to secure a Tree Removal Pen1L from the C1ty. The purpose of this penit is two-fold. First, all trees on the site oust be identified and proposed development 1s designed to save as many trees as is practical. The second aspect of permit approval is the ab111ty to provide rcplacealent trees for those removed. It 1s this part of the approved Tree Removal Permit which affects you and your property. As a result of • development, a number of trees were required to be removed along the west boundary of the tract. Replacement trees were required, a few of which were 1n your back yard. Tree Removal Permit 85-22 was approved on August 12, 19~. The lVndi ii Vns ui ayy,'u9~i r8quiicu ti,. yi ii,iiiry ~` -i i.iw r ~ ~~.°.~ Eucalyptus maculate (spotted gl~), 8 feet on center, along the wst boundary of Lots 6 through 9 and ZO through 22. The planting of these trees is to re-establish the Eucalyptus windrow Dreviously touted 1n that area. Ordinance No, 37 Pertaining t0 the preservation of trees on both public and private land, nquiros the approval of a Tree Removal Permit for any tree or trees within a Eucalyptus windrow. Sinu the tees at the rear of your property are wt thin this designation, an application for a Trce Removal Permit and Planning Division approval is required. Since you have removed the trees 1n your rear yard without an approved Tree Reawval PeA1t, you are currently in violation of Clty Code. Replacement of these trees will be required in their previous locations. An on-site inspection will be required to ensure fiat the trees have been replaced and will be maintained 1n a thriving manner. Your cooperation to attending to this utter will 6e appreciated. In order to provide a timely resolution, please contact me prior to June 25, 1987 to discuss a replacement schedule. if you have any questions regarding this notice, or the requirements of the Municipal Code, please feel free to contact me at (711) 989-1861. c....,.,..,,. v.~ Debo,N N Brv.n borer Kie9 cn r.... ermu L. SUwI CTUIn J.equnll~~ P9m9w J. Wnam iron M.Wrursr Ronald and Leticia Benu.wo June 12, 1987 Page 2 • Sincerely, CONMUNITY DEYELOPNENT DEPARTMENT PLANN/IfNG~DJf YI~SION Richard L. Alcorn Code EMorceaKnt Officer RAagr • • .; f • - _ __ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 27, 1987 Ronald &ncoeo 9538 Gala Avenue Rancho Luca~onga, CA 91701 Paw Oeo an b1, aawEe ci,e,waaw, pyb,w, 91110. ~'l,~ 9e~. SUBJECT: TREE REMOVAL PERMIT BT--~ (RELATED FILE: TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 85-22) Dear Nr. Bexaao: The Planning Dirislon has received your appllcatton for the nawval of eleven (I1) Eucalyptus eaculaia (Spotted Gu•) trees frog your rear yard to allow ro0~ for landscaping and strutWral additions. The trees 1n question were required by the C1ty to b! planted 1n con~uncLlon rtth Trect 13066 to replace the original Eucalyptus wiredraw ghat ws re~oved for tM lnstallatlon of roadwy fe>prorawents and stone drain fxTltefes in your trxt, Reegving these trees could be contradletory and Tncanslstent with the pollctes and Intent of the Tne Pnserratlon • Ordinance. Based upon these detenlnatlons, your Tne Rsoval Pena request has been denied. TM potted eleven (11) Eucalyptus exulaU shall be replanted eight (8) fp+ on center and any daawged or dead trees shalt h. ..nl~___ nrj.7~LtT5y «a` was Pi ace rlLnln a pertOd 0} thirty (30) days froe the daU of this letter. iatlun W replant the tees would constiwt! a rtolatlon of tM Tne Pnserratton Ordinance, punishable by a fine of not aqn than 11,000 and/or by teprlsonMnt not to exceed 6 aanths. Please contxt tM Planning Derision for tnspxtton following nplacenent planting. TMs decision 1s f1na1 unless appealed within ten (10) calendar days. Such appeal oust M filed with the Sxntary of tM Planning Casetlsston in writing, togetMr with the :62.00 appeal fn. If you should have any further questions, please contxt Ta• inhn of this office at (711) 989-1861. Sincerely, C NIT pEVEI NT P TIIENT D N1N6 IV1S ~A Da Co Se Planner OC:TG:vc ~~~ ~~~~~ r ~ I r J 1 ~.i~~4N-o~f 3 ~ 11`3`1 f DEDEIII~D C11Y OMINISTRACU~CANNONG AUG 041987 ( ,~ 7 \F~I18~1~Q 6 ~~~~~„~~ 0~14' ~a I ~ n ill • T0: Planning Commission FROM: Ron & Leticia Bencomo DATE: August 10, 1987 `r'.' RE: Appeal -- Tree Removal Permit 87-~ Please accept this letter as notice to appeal Che decis icn reached by the City's Planning Department regarding Tree Removal Permit 87-34 which requests permission to remove 11 Eucalyptus Trees from our rear property. We understand that the Planning Commission has the authority to overrule such decisions, and we would like an opportunity to present the facts as they apply to our individual situation. We realize that the Planning Department must follow procedure when making these types of decisions, and that Chey must follow set guidelines. However, the decision-making process is so "cut and dry", we felt that our individual circumstances were never considered. (AS a matter of fact, we were given an indefinite verbal denial before we even turned in our application). • We agree that ordinances must be adopted to preserve the look of the city. Especially in cases where outside developers come into our city wanting to remove trees to make way for their projects. However, we do not fit into this category. We have a unique problem which we feel warrants individual attention. Therefore, in defense of our appeal we would like to point out a few concerns: PERSONAL CONCERN: We have a real concern that as homeowners we have no input into what we are being told must be Maintained on our property. When we purchased this property six (6) months ago (it is a brand new home), no mention was ever made of trees. As a matter of fact, we moved in before landscaping was complete and when [he trees were planted we were told it was part of the landscaping package and that what we did with what they planted was "our business." We, by no means, want to come across as being hard-nosed about this situation, but it seems [o us that the City is asking us to keep trees that we not only do not want but ones which will cause problems in [he future. We ace being asked to maintain the trees and to be the ones who will be responsible for any tree-related problems. To cover any questions you may have regarding legal obligations, I have attached a copy of our "Deed of Trust" and Declaration of Restrictions" pertaining to [his lot, Ron & Leticia Bencomo • Appeal -- Tree Removal Permit 87-34 Page 2 and you will see that no mention is made of the 11 trees in our rear yard. As known to most homeowners, the only responsibility that is listed is the maintaining of the tree located in the front yard. Although the Plann.ag Department felt that this information was irrelevant in making their decision, we felt that it lays the foundation for our appeal. PROPERTY SIZE CONCERN: The concern in this area is simple, and it represents our main complaint. This type of Cree (Eucalyptus) and so many of them do not belong on property [he size of our rear yard. As you examine the dimensions of the property on the attached development plan, you will see that an unreasonable amount of trees were planted for this area. Although it seemed obvious to us that we are going to have problems in ehe future, we are not experts in this field. Therefore, we hired a horticulurist to give us his professional opinion. As you will see by the attached Letter, he confirms our belief that there are far too many trees for this size lot. He also makes a few other points regarding maintenance and future problems. We believe that • you can imagine the problems we will be facing when the trees begin to grow and become a threat not only to our block wall but also to our home. It is apparent when looking at the trees that there is a problem, so we welcome each commission member to visit our home if they wish to make a iauai iuaPeuLiuu ui ibis situation. (Note: We plan to have additional information for the Commission at the appeal meeting. We were unable to compile all of our research in time for it to be included with this letter). A few other points that we would like to make pertain to the "Pur ose and Lntent" of the Tree Ordinance. We would like to begin y quot ng t e first paragraph: "The eucalyptus, palm, oak, sycamore, pane and other trees growing within the City of Rancho Cucamonga are a natural aesthetic resource which help define the character of the City. Such trees are worthy of protection in order to preserve the scenic beauty, prevent soil erosion, provide shade, wind protection, screening and counteract air pollution. Lt is pertinent to the public peace, harmony and welfare that such trees be protected from indiscriminate cutting or removal, especially where such !rees are . associated with a proposal fot development." ~i"P I ~ ~ ~~ i l U • Ron & Leticia Bencomo Appeal -- Tree Removal Permit B7-34 Page 3 As we read this paragraph, which gives the reasons why these trees ate worthy of protection, we would like to make the following comments: Scenic Beauty - Without sounding sarcastic, we would have to say that we fail to see how Yrees growing intertwined within a block wall, facing homes and a storm drain would add scenic beauty to the City. We agree that this wou13 apply to tree-lined streets and parkways where the trees would indeed add to the look of the City. Prevent Soil Erosion - Again, we fail to see where this would apply to our situation. Because Che trees were planted within private property, the only land being affected is our rear yard. Because the trees were planted on a slope, our intent (as shown on our development plan) is to put a retainer/planter that would eliminate any erosion problems that might develop because of the block wall. Provide Shade - This matter is an understatement in our case. • In an open area within the City where large trees are an advantage, we believe this would apply. In our case, we would have far too much shade. The trees would overpower the rear yard and not allow any sunlight into our home. Wind PrOCeGtIOn - Wa roal ;,,e th°! .., ^f `hc -„" cm~.,a. ua ui the City is to replace a windrow-which once existed on this land. When we read the definition of "windrow" in Section 19.08.030 MF, it defines a windrow as "a row of trees, usually a variety of Eucalyptus, planted to provide a windbreak to protect property or agricultural crops." Well, if we look back to the past, we remember that there were in fact agrir_uliural crops Located on the same land where our home is now located. That row of trees had a definite purpose during that time. The agricultural crop is gone. We now have 27 two-story homes on the east side of this windrow and a storm drain and homes with many trees to the west. We would question what purpose a windrow would have sandwiched between an area developed with homes and trees. If anything, the wind damage from these trees would be great>r rhan any protection they ray glue to the homes and property. Screening/Counteract Air Pollution - We have no knowledge about this issue. We would guess, however, that the Eucalyptus tree is not the only tree that could serve this purpose. We do intend to plant a tree/trees, but not Eucalyptus and certainly not 11 trees. a~~ t;, l,~ ~ k „ Ron & Leticia 6encomo Appeal - Tree Removal Permit 87-34 Page 4 In summary, we would ?.ike to remind you that the trees in question are not the full-grown Eucalyptus trees that once existed on this land, but rather a "baby" Eucalyptus ihat was planted approximately six months ago. We would like to stress to the Commission that we have tried to see the reasoning behind the Planning Department's decision, but fail to see the purnoat. for keeping these trees. We cannot help but notice that throughout the City there are Eucalyptus trees that are being removed and not being replaced. And we must again mention the fact that the trees now sit on property that is someone's back ysrd, not an open piece of property that a developer is trying to build on. We would ask that the Commission consider all areas of this matter. Thank you. LJ (Additional information, photographs, etc. will be available • a[ the appeal meeting). Attachments: 1) Tree Removal Application 2) Deed of Trust 3) Declaration of Restrictions 4) Development Plsn 5) Horticulturist's Letter 1 L J ,x.18 ~ , ~ ~ ,, ~, r City of Tree Removal Permi Cucamonga DEVELOPMEN' r~ `Ir-~ _~ ~_ ~_ _Z Z Z g Z W a 1'` -• W h'~ Z U LL. d !-- W H W ! S TREES OR 58 {.WEAR FEETOF~WINOROY ._ FSNER~1~_INFORMATION?::r±:!.."~icr:;~`?OR MORETHAN Ordlnanee No. 278, pertaining to the preaervatlon of irons on private property, requlrea that no person remove or relocate any woody plants In excess of fifteen (15) feet in height and having a single trunk circumference of filtasn (15) inches or more antl multi-trunks having a circumference Of thirty (30) Inches or more Imeaeured twentyfaur (24) Inches from ground level), without first obtaining a Tfee Removal Permit from the Clty. ,B~COMP.LETED.BIG APPLICANT: - -..+~'.:~- ~~AF::='.:,•«:i:>.';a+'ac:S~r.Plrx' :'~.-'~ ~•" +'': LOCATION OF SUBJECT SITE: 950. >A .~ tii~i+~ v,\l:,l.~..,w .ca 9\-\dv NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF APPLICANT: ~,oi\ ~~ ~(lcmm~ A\~ Le.,.~ . ca ~t~~t ~~ti-~o~a q53~ ~.w~a a.,~.,..~ ~ NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONECOF PROPERTY OWNER pf omsr then appllcantg NAC~\ a'~S la ~iU C, REASONS FOR REMOVAL(attacn nsceaaary sheets): \ t/ She. A"CCP.~4~.F0 ~h4 ~~s 1 e PROPOSED METH00 OF REMOVAL' ~~o. '~~c,r n.~'Y. APPLICANTS SIGNATURE: v/~~X.r~~sN~O DATE: G-as-~~ ONAL';EILINfLREOUIREMENTS ='v.~+:~7.'~~1..:,--.. •~•+a+,~ ~ • -w'~I'' Thle appllcatlon atoll InGuds a plot plan Intllcatlnq location of all trees to be removed and retainetl. The species, number, and a@s of the trees to be removed shall be so designated. It a tree is diseased, than a wAttan statement from a licensed arbOrlel slating the nature of the dlaaeae shall be required. O ,'.Erelwtlan oG tIW appllcatlon la baaad on.tM.mltaels~on YM vine elde..~• „r~'' Ab='+ x ^ APPROVED ^ DENIED ey: Rsaeona: Date: Noldicauon of application snail be gwen to property owners within a three Hundred loot radius ten da~, prior to approval. If no appeals are receivetl, than the permit shall berome of}active ten (10) days from tt data of action. This approved tree removal permit Is valid for 9G daya from the date of final map recordatic or bulltllnq permit issuance, whichever comes tlrot. Should applicant fair to remove the trees witHin this S day psncd, a new permrt obeli W required, unless an exteneian ~s roquested fourten (14) days prior to U expiration of :n permit. e p ~ • ~. ~ ~.0.`OOr\ ~ro.\\ Owr ~C1.Cl~r+wr'd, C;1\\5 \~\__g ~iw~o. ~ . 1' ~P~,. ~ of a) ~oc OWi C~c1v.~S\ ~o 'C~1\\OV,t ~c1\e, ~'+ecS Qco~ecl~ ~\S ` ~o~ c~.ev~~o,~\~\er~t o~ o~; CSae. Y~wr\ ~ V\~\;.c~1\ \S 0.'~crac~t.e,., ~) ~V~ Q,ar\ Ito Ce.\\wvr. ~\\a. Qt~tl.~u. ~u~~. ~.c~.1/i\q O~ CR.~U.1,\Q\' IJ~~w1\~~C.Y Qd jcsC Y\\l J ~O ~~1~, E U~pCi~ lr:,c+.~`~. ~~\`1 S VJ~\1G\ W,~~ ~.X~i\\O. Gw~ ~'~. 4a-,.tT ~Ypr~ ,~ 1 ~rr:e5 wc, wa.,_\c~. ~\c~v~ c\\~ to ~+iet ~~ `~Q-'u~ ~ ~ wo Cie tas. \\~1S \.:0.,.~, ~C w~.~v, <eS+T 1u~ Sv_n \r~~T 'to ~-\~1S C~ceo., 3. \ y~L. '~ 10\.-.\ 1 ` \ ~\ ~t~~,+\`,c. 'i~~~{ ~t(\ \ 'S\`4_ l\O~ti i C=.. ~3ln~,o\hm,nc, ~CO\ V\M\~ \ \1,S ~1f\vJ. J\. U~t \,h ~0 ~S1~~t ~O ~D \~ \n1.Z C).~Y lAl\O~>~i. '40 ~~0~~". ,ttl ~~v0, \iJ ~+.~.~ ~OT ~VV.. E.\\4V.c`~ 1C GC1`n ~'Or 4F1C0~. a1~,1 c1`~~4 L.~c, l~...~, \1\~ lo,w , c_p, 5 ~~ o ~ ~a~. a o~ ~.~w.L~ ~.e. ~r~rS arc1, ~.h~. \~\oek w~~ . (~~,z., ~` z~S ~.~~ o,.~y 11 ti ~ ~ ~.~.~ Cw~wv~ ~OVh y4,~ Wn~,\ W\\~Ct'\ V+~@. O.r~, S) ~ h~ iv`~vre. S:cze. G~ ~.~ ~C.~cs ~S o.~So 0. CoY~e~crt., vCk~, v~c~rc~.'S S~Ze, ~~ aoo `Srwa~ ~c, vw.r c a~.~C So mwrv~~` `~,aS . ~1 ~ 1~ ~ t ~t'ASe, tlfte. ~10.X C~ ~c ~,\ `W.c~\ C~ c~c.S ~ C\er c~ ar.. \ c\ ~\~h4... ~vrc~\bS„~y L1\:~ ~h~`1S` pcoQ~1.c~ J~~Zc~~.~.) V;\,G`S `~v.. ~\oh~~, \ oa'~d. "'o7c we movs,\\C \~,)t. W+t~ e.. QbTO.\,L,\;\~\c W ~, ~a 0, O~S,c. ,~.u.. O~ W~ ~,X. 4)wrt~vA. J~ Oox ~\e>.~ ~o~ri.' C~'cc~. ~l~Ctl,;",bz o~C `~~sc. ~c~es we. o~Ca. u.\~\.,_. yo ~O~~ow `k.~~ouc~\~ v;;,~ ~.ost. ~c~.~.s. ~CO.,.~.,sc.., t~ o ~..~~~~ o,. wo.s ~cvtir '~'~ac1a, ~ V ~r ~.\y Cr , ~~ ~c ,~:v. C„~\ ` ~.,~.~ ~ aa~. ~r ~~. ;1~.c~ox q~4, ~v\ ~ R~S~ ; ~~, ~,~ , V.16~,.\.q ~Z Cc~c a..\~..~. lCV~`n ic~~cw.nJ~hrcv.CcJ\~ w~~ Ow~ 't~\a•. e~,, t~~yr~~ C-C,r\rS\ J`o ypv_ \koDaci~. C< `~\e. Sev~ccV~ CeGSr.~\S ~~5~.~, A\xve. ~,.~. v=c.~,~, aq~,te:~~.~e. ~`OI~Y' ^' ... ~: r. ._:,~ , , . ~; ~ . '_~.~~ '. ~..,. :,..~`AN ~~ __,__~X/JTi~/G ~,PO {"'fly' I i ` - -- - - 1 , -- - ~~s " - - - -- -------+ - - ~Oy. 9.s.~~ G•al~/ /~a~ - .~a' ~, _. _._ ~~" ~v~y__. /~''~. --. _ .- _. ---- • we v .sco?tAgt.'eA 'n'gT1O ?vLi~, _ _ .. __...: ~q~ Jt qa /j ~ ~~~1F ~'avcrars C/T~'Egs6NL.a/T at4'w~l[~ r~ ... .. //off ,~~~ ., ` -'T _._-~__~LK~~..... __ _ .. .._._-_ }_- PLUM f ._.- ._- _ - ._ -._.- -. __ _. _ __, T -- --- ~--, -- v ~ - - --- /A9 -- - ~ ------ -- -- -Gtmt---F-- ., - - --- - --- --- - - Dlc,~i/~i/1y~ar . ~M1 _ ,r ... _ .v ' ~ ~ov` - ~J~ - ..._ . _ _ y~ Jwin.-v.r~ ~ :JytJlyE. ~7 .. i~ - ~ c~P /~Yi ifAS J //D ~.S •__^^_-^^_°^__•_^^ R?="...^,CE^ iN C~ICIAL RfC^"0S FEB 20 1987 AT 9.OOAM a1.w"" ~j1` SAN BERNARBINO CBUNTY, CALIF. Mwx<mmmeMn BENCONO, RONALD d LETffIA f l • ~• 9538 GALA AVENUE &'7-05566) 0.M'110 CVCAMONCA, CA 91]01 ~ ~` _ _ ru,rx~nx rNrt./aYI TNeNEIMgtplpEll'f Vat r mcommun p^MM m./ 141.90 ,max SANL AS ABOVE eco ommo-nm.^lue or erexrtr w•mea. o• C'oT0Y110 on lull n N S e cvm nmi Cnn.^f xm.m1n91M11an rl urM Ol ran - - the ende [slg0<d zv^aw.. of fm~.r.a o•.cxrl aaxmmmo ~.. .. Exgw Nn wm<oroo•nw aren corm ___f61095_.__- Ti1NONxNn Nsl (16L cp/a911argx GRANT DEED 0242-111-62 x,.Yxr,MtOn l.rWnri ur~nY [.r.d.nu • FOR A VALUABLE t ONiIOENATION, n[npl of u hrcn n her<M .cknwl<J9N. HILL-4ILLIAM3 DEVELOPMIIIT CORP., a Calitornla corporatlan hertby GRANTISIw RONALC BENCONO ANp LES[CIA BENCOMO, huabud and m1[e a ,lain[ unan[a the fmlloxmg deunhm rvl properly m the Clty o! Amehp Cu<uonga counq~nf Ln Bernardino .ualr otl ddmma. Lot 7 Tract No. IlObb, a pee up ueorded le Beok lg9 0[ ILpe, Papa 93 and 99, Lv the m[t1a of the County Recorder of uid County. Tie <onveyano Se uda aed a<upud ud /aid Droperty L hrtebv ude subJect eo thou eareatm cowaanu, cmndltiou and tart [1e C10N eonuined In [hat crtoln Oec Ltaclon o[ 0.utrletlou ncotded Juna Sr 1986, a Znetrusant No. 06-141336, 0L11cL1 0.uoeda o[ uld County all o! Vhich by thin nGnnca [orN hareln^--_, ____ _r..... ~... y.., h.c•m a cnoutn tudq ear NtLL-YILLtAN3 DEVELDPNENT CORP., ~ • G11[arnL eoepoutlon • De1N Uc sober 2i. 1986 _____.___, gy,C~~__~,d~"~"_','/_~' ~l~_ _ Icmwnuon' ~ Donald H. NSli tams Jr.'U ST1iE OF 4LIflq Yl • P[Oldem[ 5. cWxty nA _Saa .Lrurddoo q~ Decober 39 1986 .n,~rr-. ~m ~.wn.y,rm .~.~.~. r.r, ~, ~rr.rr.i~ ~. r _- DemafA x YL1Llama..la.~_ ___ ._ vmamr.fM __..._ __ -_... ,a,,.. v ,. i. ,nr ri n..a .n.,n .., ,., rlnwnurmlwrpoNw on 1M0YItDl xuJUrwf nwnr,n ru^e ~~ ~ _ _ _ IwpMNwllW mxuW ln~rnm lnMrvmMl.lmnnra mt~u h"FV Nrurv. alrnnnurNlM+~lmn lmrrum<nr.r'l. tin mmp.W¢arq.INxp rammrMl•ryA[wpnnunn nKmN+^^in inrrnrmmr rynuenl In ~p n, a+,u mdn ~v .r r nri r+i CN ~ WITNESt mypyeq/d(~ o'rmm~~ rx~l/ /~/ I ^,• .'/1'A cEACH ` Sgnnu,e ~!/~1(aZ.S-/ (f' ~t ii .. +vr E.L Namelhwa Or hlmedl PpAN tau MML tAR 3TATEM[Ni3 A9 DUEC3ED MOVf ^~tl S.1 t D 071 CL-1530-136757 • ONMit'S POLICY-J.P.-LOAN-1973 Califoreia Lod Tiele Yuociaeioa tc Stallard Coverap Policy Doa 1973 ' SCBEDOLt A CP os ' Ordas Ma.: $51467 Tre~iw: $265.20 Polity Mo.: CMJP-1501-138612 tffaetiwu Dens P~bruary 20, I9S7 ac Bs00 N Aatwet: $128,990.00 1 • Mau of loauzed MONACO 1LMCONO AD LtY'ICL1 1000110 2. Thu eugn er ianrpt /a tha lad Mwribad Mnlo ad uhieh is eovesd b chit foliq !n e PLt 3. ?ba unn or iataeut nGrsed to Mrels L at Dan o! Policy wand to: tOMALD SEMC0110 AND LMTICLI ttMCOMO, eaeoata as vita, n leiat Goan •. I'ha lad ntarsed co in Chia Pelicy ie eitwnd to the Stab of Cal[lonia, Cotaty o! Sao Mroasdlao, and Se ducribed u foliova: Lot 7, Tract Me. 130ii, Lo the City of taebo Coeaotp, Coooty of Sao Mzaardiao, ttan of Glitoreia, u Per rt neerded !a 6oeh 159 of Maya, rape 9i aad 99, to ebt otliea of eha Cowq Raeord4r of will County. oc~•cti9~1 1• ~~ ~°r • 2y~ yc1 oa 4oi gbi1 ~,'t~ta ~ •~.i• ,yQ~.i~ g ~. c~1G4 ~•. cb• •oa• c° e-• ~.lg~g so/et cb• of 3 t • ~ ~,~yb11 °•••a °,,l tsos g ~ 65 Q t .01 aycb y.. sQ°~••bO°b 1 yj4 t •W•• •.ro.yo~yt°`c cy ~•a io sos °o yo ~s~ .l ~f.~ of C1 cya• tcOS io is `y0 ,\ `. -9 ~v~~ot °• -ty°~s~ MNA°1 .o~ ~~• -s°.n~-• .. 1` ~Ly .,i°•~~eb°on1. 4 • Gy..`b.. °0r s•~t S•~ c , ,~ cyoo ,yo. gyp,.- ~- qV-'.c 'yoo 1 ~ V•yi V c a cb /• • /a '•bN!/-M •1°°c°a cc s°`°t goO~a , a °o •••ocsycyso tob•. ~ °t s••dsyo-S1 ~taye° syo °sGodia a ~N~oa. g ott o` ucl j-1o< sti ycy°: °sa+ uy sOa~6°oNs,4-6 sa°•c °t o'`-cyo . ~oi a /a t c.. cOa°ti~ V°°s °s ~~ •~ aAt;~J vd3 to °s c~s taa ac ott t- Sa coc%t ptty° sy°, e .1 ~.~;` ot~cVsV •1•GCS•yaecJ goo s., V3 4••c o gs,~sybb9 oc t°s //,~~. .~yo` cb• •s`cop9-`opoQo°o4~~~bsti1 B •/~°°. ~yt oc g'O~tt•° °s .Y~oo. ~oo ~Og~ cbo .o sooc• of sds,yo. /al y°`~cv°s gb.'1`cyot b • . ,mss'' t~~yt°t0 /~y~~°, ; '~°~vo ,tt• b •. o•~y~/°' •say ~ sg~ a oa• ~•ya •do< )•5 gvc• /a ys~oc ••-•°bt 9 • .• y0 •°b' ac t cb• yo• t/c Q•~ ac •a-~3. tg •tb• yyy°~y°o ~• a°csVl~ ~ yp4yaoc s••°sa• o t•,5•Q` ~s ` cb•_..e Qs°• ty t°s S/- . -°acs`4' •.. saa os of .'o~- • /~,. Vyb~Ot a es occ s ~••a• °yao~ocs~• sQ°.o! •-Sa , 1/•cb°o°t i• 4/. hoc yV.9,1g e ~ o,~ J1 ~•°c • ps,`~y ~ya•. / •~ ~• Yip +-cs s°cy0••a-• yP°ya .° 1~ ssb y,~o' ~°b cs°s b°°a 1• i••y 1~ • sc t°s ° c 1ti °t o Ot fY• w .•c t° oc °, a t. a• io /d' /~ ~ as°y /• / o°c~OSOypc c O yo; ,s ~-65' °s -c°~ob°c• °ssy°c, a ~c1 .e °dy°t c~° ca ~aA ,a,. 3• ~yo ~- sc ~ ~a cs r S o° w c'/cos a• ~s,~o~°soy,' ~~ ., c ~~ c 0 s ONtO:a'S POIICT-J.t.-IAaN-1973 Ordat Mo.: 8514{7 80at1DOL6 H p4lt II Glitoraia Laod Ticla Aasoeiatioa 9taa4rd Grasals Polie7 ton 1973 tOLICT lp.t CBJP-1501-135612 • 4. Tha 11aa of aaplarental tas•s, i! ta7, usuud punaant to eb proedaloan e! Cbpbe 3.S (Garnaio8 rich 8eatioa 73) of cha bgow sad Tsutioa G4 of Cb 9tata et Glltonia. 1. V auaret ter qbr pipaliua tad ionidsabl parpoua, is Lnor of M. 9allnaa aM l•aa Gllaaa ~ ieatrrrat raeordad is look 211, pya 437 of DaNa. 2. M turNSt ter taut silhb ad iseidaatal prspua, ie taeoz of Iaais N. Ibllra, •c aa., ~ loatrv.eat raeordad Oatebr 9, 1900 in Doaa 288, pap 128 0! Oseda. 3. b waMat !or wcar gad iaaidaatal prrpus, L lnor of Haranaa Nabs Corpsat, • uepndoa y lu trt~aat ruerdad 9aptanbar 1), 1910 is look 4{S, pap 223 of DaeU. 6. b auaaleaC toe storms drain aW ioaipabl prppaaa, is fa+oe of eb Ciq et Wsb Cresaoap, arar cha Wat 20 tut of raid lud, u abora oe eb rp et eaid ergot. 5. Coeswet, ceNitieu ud natsiacieu u eet tort- L a Daelatacioa of 4atrlatioaa raaerded J:oa S, 1988 u Iwtrnarmt Mo. 8F14)326, of O[tialal 4sosda of lan Mrnardito Gut7, Glltonia, rhie6 psovida, aaga8 orbs ehiap, chat • doiatioa ebesat abll mt dsiut or reedar iaralid tb lice of ew. «._._~: ~: ~~:~ y L[.ei roe in jooa faith gad for ~alw. • Said eoweaab, condition sod rutrittloee an iacozporabd ~ wtasuu L tb Mad raeordad Ahnary t0, 1987 u Iaserurae 80. d7-OSS{iJ of Otllalal baorda of lag Nraaedieo Grnct, Glifenia. 6. b auaaast toe rrinl ad/or rNagrerad •laatria er eaa~aoieacion acres torn, aN iaeldsabl pnepous, u eonrgad to Gnasal Te laphent Grpaq o! Glltonia, • aoeporrtlea q /utr:o.rt raeordad Aupat 22, 198{ se Iutrrnaot Mo. 8h241{7{ of Ottlaiai baeeda o! Sag 8anardiao Gantt, Glltonia, atteetia8 the Sorcharlt 7.00 cue of said land. 7. Aa auernc toe usial ad/oe rWarBroaM alsatrie er ea:~uaieatioo atnetara, aM ixi4sul paspspa, ae eoora7ed to 8oatbrn Galifoeaia 6disoo Caapaq, • corperacloa pf iutruaaat raeordad Sapbahar 4, 198{ a Iaatrurat Mo. B{-255007 of O[liaial 4eords of Ssa Mroardiu Gang, G11loraia, albetial cha 9oatbel7 3 Oat of acid land. .~ ^~ Ordae tlo.: BS1467 ~ ~ dteacpal to ad ub • prt o£ Sdvart iitla Cwrury Caapaa7 Polie7 wo. CR7P-1301-13tl612 i Continwtiu et behadola D -Part II d. • Dud of Sroat to ueara a ladabeaduu u haniaatbr ut ut, ud u7 ocher ueonta p7abl• radar the Gnna eharaol: Dated: la-swry 11, 19H7 Trrator: faaald Lncaw and Iwtieia laneeae, Yoahaad ad rite, u ioiot neasu Irwuas la C.a. Twat Dud larriaa, • California sosyoratiu ltaafieiarys W WrtDya Iu., • California eerPeratiu 4aoaot: OSi,621.00 Yteosdad: Iahrwry 20, 1917 u Iaactmrat Ib. i7-OSSdM et OttielA 4soeda of 9p laeeardiu, California • ^~~ TRACT N0. 13066 IM TNT CITT Ox NANCMO CUC}YONOL • r~r a. r.w'x. r u. r s..Y:u w w.xr..~xw u.r,NrNxxr *•..n uw~vw W.•mrwm. nnruw.ur ~:.+wir w'r °yLSrw yraa~iys .......nxy~ ..n. ..'.x~i~~rwni'~. `w° ~ rv ~ a c.Yy a rwY y. w r.u.r w..v.r.~ .r r. r wu .. nr~...u .... Wry.+:v~w y'iwy:~ ~~. v..~rT.. ..~. ~. r• ..~~iu~~n.e v. a* ru.L yx .ri... ... r.~. N+~v1yxA..N~ ~...y.u ..:~r'.:~'uLCa ~W4 rlwLrw ~ .r~..:....y .w us. ry ..xcY W . w w„uy. is ~w ..u°,,.iyy'u~<yuoiw. I lTAT! NIONWAY pOUTE a0 .MYrwY ~- n ~y'Y'MY~ ~-_ ~ y' 1lTN sTp!!T 7~ I ~ ~+F g ~jT tl ~i ~ T i 1 T T rp ` ' i~ _ 1 Q ~^ I ~ 1 rNp~ ,yN ~ IL a0 i~ '; ~ T , d,. y i '•.~ •s S \ i •~~~ ` I I ~ y t" ~wiW ~ oTia '~ j i a7 „ `~ T ~~ ..~./ - ~ r ...•..:. ,t .. .. :: 0 KNy-, ~,M} .Oy' WT nni"Y, Y O aj` y ~. M~yr}I.~n~M ~ -~ 'ISM • •L ~~ 1lIL~.~ I~1T~ ~ r r r ..~~ +"~a~ A a '41~Ipa s ~; ': . r m : ~ n ,a fa ,~ y yw .yh' .Yy' \! y_ yy' r~ \- I! u I n is Is `i~ yx~ 'L. r ~-- a7 a~ ~ as j ae j aT 0. /. LINOS QOIIHq! uRpxq C}N/OArnp . 0 n•y, yr r .ry S .'M'rf Iyw _ }M. /YM YIY' rr11' NR I M• pr' /IY' yy r wr ssY . /Yl' Mr MM' yN /YIN 4y' yx' yN al -~ ~ = I. i;f .. ~ ` 1 ~ y ~~ MYIpY _T MM' Y }•L. _ _ LVLINx ~ ~ - = rw .r4 VI ___._ -- - .. ,<..r ~, . w '~~ { ...M1 IOx` Lgxu1 w ~ ter,.. . ~ .. ~..... N. .. ~MM .yw., . ='r Inro/ j ~ _ n i 1C/ I Zr. V:~ ~~ __- -, ° ~ .. t _~ ~ airi RECORDING REQUESTED Ay: b6-14'7526 NHEN RECORDED, HAIL TO: STE4ART TA~I TTTLTTTE[ CO. OECLARAT[ON OF RESTRICTIONS ATTN. pPORTER THACT N0. 17066 • This Uec Larac ion, made by [he undersigned, effecting Luta I through 27, inclusive, Tract No. 17066, aiGUa[ed in [he [icy of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of Cal tfornia, es per map recorded in Book /89 of Napa, Pages end ~-, in the ufEice of Cha County Recorder of acid County. YITNESSETH: HH Eft EAS, Hilt-Milliama Development Corp., the owner of aLL said Tract No. 17066, said party hereinafter being refered co as "Dec laranc". NOV, THEREFORE, on conaideracion of the premises •nd for the use and purpose herein sec forth, the above Dec laranc does hereby declare Cha[ all conveyeneea of Lo[s and ParCela cumpriaed in [he aDmvs described real property, shall De made and accepted upon the follaving condic ions, provia ions, rescricciona and covenanca whicA shall apply co and bind the pr rciea ch<reco, [heir heirs, succeaaora and ass ig na, and/or designed. for the mutual be nefic of ch• owners or lots above dear ribed, such conditions, covenanca and rascriccione being as follows, co • vie: fl) Land use and building Gyps. No lot shall be used axce pc for residential purposes. No building shall be erected, altered, Placed or permitted co r..m .,^ ;.;,~ ,,,~ urnar l~l all OO! da ached alOgla-fdm lly dVelllog nOC CO !%cCGd two and one-half stories in height and a private garage for not more ch •n three care. (2) No noxious or offensive trade, bus ineaa, industry ar activity shall De carried on upon any lo[ ri[hin acid Trace 17066 and no [ruck or commercial vehical may be ac ored or parked on any premises not fully enc lofed by • prau nenc building. There shall not be scored, kept, maintained ar permitted co be upon any portion aE said Lots, not fully enclosed by pecmanenc building, any broken dorn machinery or metal or material des ignaced sa "junk". (I) Any Duiid Toga placed, erected or altered on any Lo[a shall have a daai[able quality of work and material, must harmonise in exterior design rich existing scruccurea and ah ould ba Located in accordance rich topography and finish grade eLevaciona. No fence or •.LL shall be erected, placed or altered on any Lo[ nearer co any scree[ Chan the min Team sec-back line unless similarly approved. ~^ I 86-14'7526 (4J Tha livable floor area of the main structure, exclusive of • one awry open porches and garages, shalt nat ba less Chan I,J65 aq ua re feet, No Duiltling shall be located on any lo[ nearer [o the front lot line wr nearer to the aide street line Chan the minimus ouilding set Dack line shorn on the recorded •ap. in any event, no building shall be loco red nearer than S feet to an interior lot line. No dwelling shall be located on •ny interior loC nearer than 20 feat [o the rear lot line. For Che purpose of ch is convenant, eaves, steps and open porches shall not be considered •a a part of a building, provided, horever, chat chic eh-L1 not be construed co permit •ny portion of a building on a lot co enc couch upon another loc. No dwelling shall De erected or placed on any building sec-Dack line, nor shall any drellimg be erected or p L red on any building site having an are• of less than 7,200 feet. No ac ruccure of • temporary charaece r, trailer, basemen[ cant, shack, garage, barn or any ocher outbuilding shall be used on any lot •t •ny time as a residence, either temporarily or pe rmanencly. (57 No fence or hedge he ighc in the front sec-Dack area shall be more than 3 [eel on •ny lo[ in said Tract. (6) No derrick or ochsr structure designed for use in boring, mining of quarrying for rater, oil, natural gas or precious • mine ca la, shall ever be erected, maintained or permitted upon any lot in s•id Tract. (7) These covenants •re co run rich the land antl ehall De binding on all of the pasties and all - ,, ;, Timing under them uurii » yea ro, a[ rh ich time said`cov.nants, shall, insofar as such procedure shall be then lsvful, be aucomacically extended far suc cesaive periods of ten years unless by a voce of the majority of the [hen recorded owners of the lore an agreement Da recorded co change said covenants in whole of in part. (8) If the par[iaJ ha reco, or •ny of Chem or their heirs or assigns, shall ever violate or atcempc co violate any of the covenenca herein, is shall De lsvful for any ocher person or pe sons owning reel property situated in said development or aubdiviaiou co prosecute any proceedings at law or in equity against the person oc persons viotating or atcempc ing co violate any such covenants an8 either co prevent him or them from ao doing or to recover [he damages or any other dues for such violation. (9) Invalidation of any one Of these r.ovenan[s by judgment or tour[ order shall in no rise affect any of th other provisioy vh ich shall remain in Eull Eo rte and effect. n ~ 86-14526 (10) Each grantee is co agree for himself, his heirs, ass igna or suc<esaors in ince rest that he rill permit Eree acceaa by owners of adjacent or adjoining Loca co alopee or dcainageraya Located on his grope rcy which affect said adjacent or adjoining lots, when such access is eaaencial for the maintenance or permanent acabaliaacion on said slopes, or a maince name of the drainage facilities for the proce<tfon and use of property ocher than the Iota uh i<h the slopes or drainagewaya are located. (II) EacA grantee oL a lot in said Tract agrees for himself and his assigns chat he rill not in any way interfere with the aatabliahsd drainags pattern wer his loc. For the purposes hereof, °Established° drainage is defined as the drainage uh ich oecured at the crime the overall dratnage of the as id Tract, including the tandacaping of each lot in said Tract, wa complaced Dy the undersigned grantor. (12) Eaaemente for the installation and maintenance of ucilLc iea and drains ga tseiliciea ors reserved as shorn an the map of :he property recorded in the office of cAS County ftec order of San Eerna rdion County. Within thews ease me n[a • no atruccuce, planting or ocher material aAall ba plae ed or permitted [o ever ca ma in which msy damage or interfere rich the inacallat ion and maintenan<e of utilities, or which may change [he direction of flor of drainags channa la or devices in the •.....nta -- .;,iii, may oost rucc or retard the ftov of rater ch rough drainage channe la or devices in the ease me nca. She eaf emanc area of each lot and all improvemancs in it shall be maintained continuously by the orner of the lot, except for the improveme n[a for rhich a puDiic authority or utility company fa reapo naible. (17) Satellite dish antennas: (a) Diehss no greater chap 1 mater in diameter may be roof mounted. (h) Dishes gru ter than I meter in diameter shall be ground mounted znd ac reenad from puDiic vier on all aides rtrh • comb inac ion of walla, Landec ap ing or buildings. (I~;) Re<iproc al eaaementa foc °solar acceaa", proh tb icing [he cast :ng of chadors by vegscat ion, ac nc[urea, [ixcures or any ocher object, except for utility vireo and similar oD je<ts are hereby granted over and ac rose subject property, subject to the following atipulaciona: a31 86-147;6 No pe raon shall alloy a tree or shrub co be placed er grown so ea to cast a shadow greater than t0 percent to the collector absorption area upon the solar Collector surface on Che property of another at any one time Decreen the hours of 10 •.m. and 2 p,s., provided [hac Chia section shell not apply to specific trees •nd ahruDa which ac [he time of installation of a spier tolls[ cot or during the remainder of [hac annual solar cycle cut • ahador upon that solar collector. (IS) ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL CONNITTEE Section I. Archireetural Approval of Proooasd I o ovemenc Except for normal maintenance and repair, no Owner shall (I) build, construe[, erect, install, or attach, any light ing fixtures, shades, screens, awnings, patio covers, gaseDos, ral ls, fences, room additions, aerials, antennas or ocher broadcasting or receiving devices; or (2) change or otherrise alter [he exterior of any E u ideot ial Structure in the Project, (h ere inafcer collectively re tarred [o as "proposed improveme nta") until •1; conditions rh ich . may De imposed Dy the city have Daen u[iafied and until the plans and spetificaciona showing the nature, kind, color, ah ape, dieencions, materials and location of the same shall have Deen submitted co and approved in writing by the Arth iteccural Control Committee provided fnr Section 3 h•..p~ c ,,, lie rmony of external design and^ location in relation co surrounding acrueture• and topog- raphy. in the even[ said Commiccee, or its designated repreaeneatLvea, ah all fail to approve or disapprove such design and lot a[ion in urLting vichin thirty (30) days after said plans and specificatLona have been auDmitted co it, approval Dy said Committee will not be reduired. Section 2. Powers. Approval of the ptana and epee if icaciona for any prapoaed im~r^-•t_e,.t may De withheld because of non^coapltance vich any of the specific cavenancs, conditions and re attic[ ions contained in chic Declaration, or because of [he re asonab Le diasacisfaction of cDe Committee with any as pecc of the proposed improvements uh ich in ch¢ r~ a unable judgment of the Commiccee will :ender the pcopoaed improveme n[ inharmonious or out of keeping with cDe general plan of improve men[ for the Project or vich the improveme nca erected on neighboring Lot a. The approval of any such work shall be deemed conditional upon the commencement of such work within • ninety (9D) days after such approval. the reefcer, cork thereon must De prosecuted diligently co completion vichin a reasonable time and in any event before [he ezptrat ,i on of any reasonable pe trod as may be specified by the Commtccee. a3a ~6-14'7526 . Section I. NemDerahi The Archiceccural Conc rol om ml'~tc'c ee to compose of Donald N. WiLliama Jr., Richard V. Crosby and Vittor A. Gengler vhoae addreaa is 5500 Santa Ana Canyon Road, Suite 211, Anaheim Hilts, CA 92807. A majority of the committee may designate a repreaencac ive co act for iG. In [he ev6n[ of death or reaigna[ion of any member of [he Committee, Che remaining mem6era shall have full authority [o designate a aucceaaor. Neither the mvmbe ra of the commiccee, not the designated represencativea ah+il be entitled Co any compensation for aervicea performed purauanc co ch is covett+n[. Ac any time, the than record ovnera of a majority of Che loco shall have [he power through a duly recorded written inacrumenc co change the membership of the commiccee of [u vi[hdrau from the committee or reaeore co it any of its povera end ducisa. Procedure. The coomicte's approval of disapproval ae required in cheae covenant: shall De in writing. In [he even[ the commiccee, or i[a deaignacad repceaencac ive Fa ila co approve or diaapprov± with in IO days after plans or apecificaciona Dave Deer lubmicced [o it, or in any event, if no auic to enjoin [he construe[ ion has been commenced prior co the completion [hereot, approval will • not 6• required and the related covenants shall be deemed co have been fully Complied vicD. PROVIDED, ALSO, chat a breach of any of the foregoing covenants or conditions shall not defeat nor render invalid [h• lien of env mo rt vav. of A..A rt t:.... m.ua in gooa talch and fo[ vatue, as co said realty or any pat[ hereof, but said covenants or conditions shall De binding upon •nd efteccive •gainac any subaequenc owner of said property or really. LN NITNESS NHEREOF, said Dec loran[ ~ a cawed ice name co De affixed hereto ch ia~_day of ~t~7 ~- 19 ~6, H[LG-4LLLIAMS DEVELO PIIENT CORP., a California Corporation ~.~t.A.~ . , ~-e SY: Donald H. Milliama Jr., Preaidenc ~. X33 STATE Q' W WFp7MA SS Cp1Mry OF San Baroardine }S5. On ew tb lled d,,.a Anrsl ~y_B6~„t ~». " dr indrrp.a . ifatry vwto n rb br ttr ca.ty .r Snit. ~},Qrytld N. YSt if amt Jr. Oar/ MIbY111 b Illt ar Veytd b n\ On tlltettt a trwsb~y ar~ta b bt iiii~fifiiiififiiiiiiiiffiiiiiii,,,aldilt ~ b+twarlke~,~+aAW1rA~v~a~ah+.~wacaw / / /d(dtY~1 a tr mmrtatt ar tasird u..rtn Inwvi.a an err a n mpnaMn ttttrt etTtO, tib tr.b.- IaOptt b~TJt9tl~Y1~t+W. 4~0w1p~a0,lrt/oby~~~MtYM M MrYn M1/1WV ~ ~ s ~ saunx.bl'~~~ TO"L' ~ -- -. . ~F e s~ww~rr oaww on~ra~ ao~.. wif lfowr au~ o~ four ~~.J..4!I~..A~fa~~.AJ AiV \ • :r -.: . ~,:,.~. ~ ,.,, s ~~.~ ..-..-r~~.-J 86-147526 ~"-* _ , ~- ~ ~~ . -, -- .. RECORDED R. OFFICIAL RECD? ,' :ii JU!I -5 ?k 2 QS SAI: 2EFNARDINO CO.. CALIF. i~<. Na. cn Dosses Landscape Contractors 1843C STREET LA VERVE CA LIFOR NIA 91750 17141 5963263 :ocpa~.y, ^.c Mr. 6 Mrs. Bancowo, 8-3-8'7 As you requested I have given sows thought to your situation, and have investigated the particular species of trw tM builder of your hove has put in your yard. I have 13 years direst exparianc^ triwwing trees, end, in•telling and waintainin9 landscapes. It is wy opinion that you have too want' trees in the available space. EucalyDtw waculeta will eventually geE to 70 tact in Celitornia. Your trace are only u ght feat apart and four feet frow your back yell. Zn eewral years their branches will interfere with each otMr and their roots will lessen the integrity of the wall. It will ba costly to weintain thaw. Possible sepeir to your well could also be quite expensive. If you went to keep that spaaiea. I reeowwend that you eliwinate all but three of the trace. Plant the reweining three with two in the narthvest corner of your property at laeet tan fast frow the wall and house. and the third halfvey betvaen the house end yell about [en fast north of your R.V. slab. Another end possibly bettor solution would be to use a different species. It you want Eucalyptus, try E, torquata or E. nicholii. The torquata hee attractive flowre end aed capwles, a slow grown, it sorely goes over 20 fast. The nicholii has a nice vaeping look and a r rong fragrance. It grow to 40 feet. ~35 In any au~ tAr~~ or four tr~~s would b~ ior~ tn~n cuff ici~nt in your a~eky~rd ~re~. If you n~fd any £urth~r M~p pU~u lit p~ know. 1 S ino~s~lf, Jobn K. P~p~ View Pr~sid~nt and G~n~r~l M~n~q~r SCLM Co. Inc. 6.9. Orna~~ntel Horticulture Z7 r • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: October 21, 1987 T0: .Mayor and Meabers of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Meter, Associate 9lanner Gi~.~ipti^ 1, t ~~>. <~ ~9 is fil ~ 2 - "> 197 SU&IECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REYIEN 87-26 - J. BERMANT DEYELDPMENT Appeal or Lne Planning Goam15570n's ec son requ r ng landscaping and i:~iyatton of the freeway right-of-way along the Drotect boundary for the Bevel opaent of thirteen industrial buildings totaling 501,425 square feet on 29.4 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8), located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue - APN 229-121- 19, 23 through 26 I. RECOMMENDATION: Uphold the Planning Calw•ission approval of the pro ec w a conditions, based on the findings contained within the resolution. II. BACKGROUND: The applicants have appealed a specific condition of appr- ovalTr Development Review 87-26, which reads as foilows: ": aloes, >iiai i yrovide ianascaDing Mthin the freeway right-of-way along the boundary of this protect. The landscape plan shall be prepared to conformance with the Cal Trans Master Planting Plan for the I-15 Freeway througA the City of Rancho Cucamonga, plans shall also be reviewed and approved by the City planner and the City Engineer. Landscape and irrigation shall be installed prior to release of occupancy for the final building of the protect. If final approvals and/or installation 1s not complete at that time, the City will accept a cash deposit for future landscaplrig of the Cal Trans right-of- way. This protect 1s located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue. fie site has approximately 850 feet of frontage along the I-15 Freeway. Because of its proximity to the freeway, screening of the protect site, particularly loading/work areas and roof tops, has been a critical concern. One way to achieve the additional screening is in landscaping of the freeway right-of-way. The District Landscape Architect for CalTrans, 1n ~operatton with City staff, is presently preparing a Master Planting Plan for the I-15 right-of-way within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This plan will serve as the conceptual landscape guide for each deveiopment to prepare detailed iandscape plans for landscaping the right-of- way adtacent to that parcel. a37 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT OR 87-26 - J. Bensant Development October 21, 1987 Page 2 III. ANALYSIS: Specifically, the applicant obtects to the uncertainty o e mggnitude (i.e. -cost) of the landscaping and the pot¢ntial delay to the protect. A. Cost of Landscaping - The exact cost cannot be deteralned until LaTTrans-c~i:es the Master Planting Pian and the applicant prepares detailed landscape and irrigation plans. CalTrans estimates that the cost would be f16,000 per acre of landscaped area. Staff feels that this figure will be higher because of the relatively short length involved. The uncertainty regarding lmproveawmt costs for Landscaping the freeway right-of-way is no different than the uncertainty which exists regarding any lmproveaxnt. Costs can only be roughly estimated until detailed plans and specifications are prepared. This is true with street improvements, stort drains and Du11d1ngs. The applicant desires to "lock-1n' their flnantlal oDitgation to iandscape Me freeway right-of-way. Stiff would not recommend setting a fixed mount for the casA deposit. • B. Tlsiny - As the Condition sates, the applicant is asked to ah ve fhe iandsuptnyy installed prior to release of occupmcy for the final Dulldtng on the site. If at that time .., .. iyy.v~~ia ne•e nut ueen accampiisned Lhe City will accept a easA deposit to ensure completion of the landscaping of the freeway right-of-way. The assurance the applicant seeks already exists 1n the condition. Even if processing and arrangements through CalTrans does take several months, the applieant 1s not Aeld up from proceeding with Dl an checking, recordation or-Tp ased construction of the thirteen Duildings chat comprise this protect. Therefore, staff does not recaaasend changing the condition. Rep full 1t , t_~- 6 City Panne BB:DM:vc Attachments: Letters of Appeal from the Applicants Planning Co~atsslon Report September 9, 1047 • Planning Coawlsslon Resolution of Approval with Conditions P1anM ng Coewtsston Minutes September 9, 1987 a3$ • Bermant Development Company September 70, 1987 Ms. Debra Meier, Assistant Planner Planning Dlv ision CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P.O. Box 807 P.ancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: DR 87-26, Bermant Development Company Appeal of Condition SA (viii) Dear Debra, This letter is written regarding condition SA (viii) of our project DR 87-26 relating to freeway landscape planning along Interstate 15. As you know, on September 18, 1987, Robert Burnett of Ellis Sloan • Burnett Properties appealed this condition to the City Council. The purpose of the appeal is not to remove the condition but to ensure us of the cost of the landscaping so we can financially prepare for its imposition. Two weeks ago you found out from rai Tranc that ~ wai. for landscaping and irrigation done to their specifications is estimated to be S1E,000 an acre. Me are prepared to commit Lo this amount now but are told that we must wait until Cal Trans completes the design standards for such landscaping before any work or bonding can be initiated. 'Ne feel this is entirely unreasonable because Cal Trans is not under any tame constraints and the issue can carry on for months. Also, once the guidelines are completed by them, there is no assurance of what the cost would be for the work. We are preparing to begin many site improvements for the project including undergrounding telephone lines, undergrounding low power electrical lines, relocating high power electrical lines, extending water and sewer lines, installing 1ardscaping and irrigation systems along Arrow Route and P,ochester Avenue ar,d putting in a public street. Ail of these improvements are simrlar to the subject condition, however, in each ease the work will begin immediately or a bond will be posted to insure the work will be comp',e ted. Also, in each instance, the content and cost of each improvement is known prior to construction. The imposition of a condition which is open-ended as to cost, timing and content seems inappropriate and would create an unfair precedent. X39. ~O - ~ ~ ~ n Ms. Debra Meier . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 30, 1987 Page I would like to repeat our position. We are prepared to commit to the $16,000 per acre estimate and will poet a bond for this amount to ensure completion of the landscaping as soon as practicably possible. Our appeal is not to remove the condition or requirement. We would like some assistance from the City to accomplish the desired landscaping. This does not seem unreasonable, because the condition was placed on the project one-and-one-half weeks before the Planning Commission hearing, after the Design and Technical Review Committees' meetings. It seems we are caught in a bind because we are the first project for which the Condition has been required and the requirements are not yet developed. Once the guidelines are prepared, developers will know up front what kind of costs will be necessary. It is my sincere wish that we can resolve this issue prior to the City Council meeting. I would like to have a meeting with you end tha City engineer to discuss any alternatives or resolutions possible for this issue. You can contact me at B05/gBB-1150 so we can set up such a meeting. Thank you for your attention in this matter. I look forward to . hearing from you in the near future. Sincerely, /, i~ Andrew R. Miner Vice President Planning G Development ARM:ajp CC: Brad Buller, City Planner Robert Rurnett, Ellis Sloan Burnett Ted Fisher a~-o ,,, Euis ~~~c~~~® SLOAN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAiO~CA BURNETT ADMINISTRATION -' '- SEP 181987 ~ ~ septattai 18, 1987 ?~8~9~tl~U~T111~314'~' g 1 aty cle~dc City of Palx3~o Cixaapnrm Post Office Box 807 Parxho Cucanmga, G 91730 Pe: Design Review a7-26-J Bement Develoaaant CU. Gentlemen: 4k would like m appeal Item SA (viii) of the above zefPretged dot heard ty the Planning Ommisei~ at their meeting on Septctper 9, 1987. • This itan selatea m landscaping of the fxeewey right oP m ors psoposad developceni. Fb axe prepared to oaply wi~tl~t ~se~uaiable ~P~9 se4uireRnte for the area imcadiately adjaoant to our property; hoaevrr, we think it i, essential that these be a definition of the dollar amxmt and time-frmne in whirth this .r.,.i .,e,,.... .~.. __~__~.. .......o uviui. The City has indicated that Cal 2Yaru estlaete9 516,000 an a¢e as the that atmim~t ~HOwe~es, we fe~el~it ids arc1 we ass pt~ated to arnmit m oomutment while we unxeseonable to have an cq~en ended area. develop structures and psepese lard sales for this We will he pleased m bring out the Pull details of our position at the City Council mating. Very truly yours, ELI.IS STpgN p.s ~// alQll@t Pat7tler ~~ -RECEIVED. ar of aaNCSlo aoastoMa r[.tNNINO eitnaleN ELLIS stOAN w OCT071987 gURNETT Z18181r1>IIpf112181gI,S18 October 5, 1987 Mr. Brad Bulkr City Planner The City of Rancho Curamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: DRE-726 Ellie Sloan BurnettfBarmant DeveWpt[tent Catspatsy Appeal of Cot~tlon SA <viii) Dear Brad: When the item relating to the landscaping of the freeway righe-of-way adjacent to our property was first initiated by ehe City the week before the Planning Commission meeting, we indicated serious concerns and suggested . the[ [he City should look into the matter on an area-wide basis rather than on a parcel by parcel basis. While we continue to feel that this would be ehe most effective way for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to approach this landscape situation, we also indicated [hat we were willing to proceed w rth landscaping a portion of the freeway area adjaUnt to our property ~r ~• ^^!C -b:air : ra:,u,i.Liae tiefinioon or exactly what the magnitude of that landscaping would be, what the cost would be, and be assured that delays by CalTrans, in either approving or designing the installation would not hold up the construction on our property. The City Planning Commission was unable to give these assurances a[ their meeting and, therefore, we have appealed this condition to the City Council, As you know, CalTrans is no[oriously unresponsive when i[ comes to pinning down issues such u this, and we do not feel that it is reasonauie the[ our project be held hostage to [hair bureaucracy. Andy Minor of Berman[ pointed cuc in his ktter of September 30, 1987 that CalTrans had indicated to the City that the typipl cost for landscape and irrigation was f16,000 an acre. ;~ _ a~2 Mr. Brad Buller City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/5/87 Page 1 Our two firms are willing to agree to that cos[ and arrange a bond to cover it so as to not unduly burden the completion and sign-oft of the project. We have had a good working relationship with the Ciey to this point and we prefer to work out a solution to this situation with staff prior to the City Council meeting on October 2'Itt. We feel strongly, however, [hat it is not reasonable for the City to hold this freeway landscaping issue as an open ended item. Please advise when we can meet at your earliest convenience to resolve this matter. Very truly yours, ELLIS SLOAN B TT PROPERTIES Robert R. Burnett Partner y RRB:bw ~~ ~ Myai; (nssiscant Planned • • n. fl„9, . CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,'140NGA STAFF REPORT DATE: ~ Septeaber 9, 1981 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Coamissi on FROM: Bred Butler, City Planner BY: Debra Meter, Assistant Planner ~~u trgl^ ~\'~ ~~ ~, ~. > 19" SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND OEYELOPMENT REVIEN 87-26 - J. - ere opaw;n o n s r a u ngs o a ng ,425 square feet on 29.4 acres of land in the General Industr/a1 District (Subarea el located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue - APN: 229-121-19, 23-26. In addition, the application 1s ^equesting Tree Respval Perwit 87-58. RELATED FILE: Tentative Parcel Map 10782 • I. PROJECT AND SiTE DESCRIPTION: A. Action R_ guested: Approval of site plan, conceptual landscape an ra n ans, and buildinn P1~Y1?~nn~ •nd int..-- 9 9 p -.~ uanw ui a negative declaration. B. Surroundin Land Use and Zonin ~r - acant'Tan n us r a Spedfic Plan (Subarea 8) South - Yacant land; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 8) East - Eztsttng nursery (Industrial Spetlftc Plan Subarea 8) and vacant land on the east side of the freeway (Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 14) Nest - Schlosser-Forge; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 9) C. General Plan Deslanatlons: ProJect~i>.c - nera n ustrlal North - General Industr±al South - General Industrial East - Utility Corridor and General Industrial Nest - Neavy Industrial D. Site Characteristics: The natural ground at this site slopes sou er y a an approxlaate 2i gradient. There is a row of seren (71 eucalyptus trees along Rochester and a continuous row of walnut trees along Arrow Route, also an olive tree and two (2) palm trees are elsewhere on the Site (see Exhlblt "U"). All trees will be removed at the tlax the s/te is developed, ~ A , ITEM L PLANNI N6 CDMNI SSI' iTAFF REPDRT DR D7-26 - J. Berwant Devetopsent Co. $eptesDer 9, 1987 Page 2 the sa~orlty of the trees cost sake May for ultisate street tsperovesents. To the west of the site is the Schlosser-Forge facility and along the east boundary lies the I-15 freeway which is approxisately 30 feet above grade to this area. E. Parking Calculations: Mlniaaa Required Parking Building/ Square (Intl 5s s.f. Parking Lot No. Footage Use Office • 1/250) Provided lA/1 27,400 Industrial 58 64 1B/2 25,875 Industrial 51 (52) 1C/3 53,210 Marahouse/ Distribution 44 56 iD/4 5a,06A Narehouse/ Distribution 44 54 lE/5 33,000 Marehouse/ Distribution 33 11 1F/6 26,400 Industrial 55 63 iG/7 22,800 lndustrlal 48 58 1N/8 39,375 lndustrlal 83 (82' 1J/9 45,000 Ma rehouse/ Distribution 40 54 7A/ln 5n inn .:; :i~uuae% OistrlDution 42 71 28/11 92,125 Warehouse/ Distribution 60 121 ZC/12 63,000 Narehouse/ D1sLr1Dutlon 48 86 2D/13 37,450 Industrial 78 (72I TOTAL 687 874 Notes: 1. Parking Ratios - Industrial - 1/500 - Ma rehouse/Dis trtbullon _ 1/1000 for first 20,000 s.f, 1/2000 for second 20,000 s.f. 1J4000 for everything over 40,000 s,f. • 2. The figures in the "Parking Provided' coluaa are a susaury • of parking spaces provided on the loL associated with each building. The figures 1n parenthe~'Ts indicate lots that contain less parking spaces than required Dy code for that PLANNING COIMISSI STAFF REPORT DR 87-26 - J. Beraant Developsent Co. Septesber 9, 1987 Page 3 • buiiding. In actuality the site 1s well parked and through reciprocal parking and access agreeexnts recorded with the parcel sap each building wilt have adequate available parking. tI. ANALYSIS; A. General: The protect consists of 13 buildings for total ev'ireTopaTenL of the 29 acre Site. The buildings are designed for a coaatination of Morehouse/Distribution uses and General Industrial and Manufacturing uses. Several lunch parks are located throughout the site for shared use by all esployees of the project. B. Des~n Review Coawittee: The Coawlttee (McN1e1, Buller, rou as rcr a protect and found that the overall site plan, style of architecture and location of loading zones cosplies with the Industrial Specific Plan. The Coseittee has recawended approval of the protect with the inclusion of the following conditions: • 1. Trees of a tall growing ability (60'-10') shall be planted along the freeway right-of-way. Tree plantings shall be clustered in pockets at various locations to addition to the row piacesent shown on the conceptual landscape plan. 2. Increase the aaqunt of landscaping arses and landscape aaterlals at the trash enclosures between bull dings 1J and 2A to help screen Lhe loading/work area beyond. 3. Lunch parks should becose part of the overall landscape/ hardsupe treetsent and can De incorporated into parkway areas and at building frontages (appropriately screened and separated Eros the oeir entry Lraffic). Lunch parks Should De clearly accessible end available for use by alt eagtoyees on the site, and should be screened and protected fras loading/work areas and parking lots. Lunch park details shall De included to final landscape plans fpr City Planner review and approval prior to tssua~ce of bull ding pertits. 4. Redesign the area around Dull ding 16 for the purpose of elislnating one drive approach (either on Arrow or Rochester) and provide the building architecture closer to the streetscape if possible, due to f1°od protection constraints. d4fi PLANNING CdMISSI STAFF REPORT DR 81-26 - J. Bermant Development Co. SeptlmDer 9, 1987 Page 4 • 16e drivasgy onto Arrow Route Au been elfminated. Do to flood retant/om constraints tha building raslin 1n nearly the sae position in rllat/on to the streetseape. 5. A11 roof mounted equipment (including air conditioners) should De completely screened and preferably interior mounted. The roof tops must look very clean. Site lines with respect to any public right-of-way shall De submitted for any proposed roof mounted equipment for review and approval by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. C. Technical Revier Coalttee: The Coa~ittee has reviewed the p K an e e n at with the following Special Conditions and recommended Standard Conditions of Approval the protect is consistent with applicable standards and ordinances. The developer will be required to underground existing overhead ut111tias along Rochester Avenue an6 Arrow Route. RelmDursement for one-haH the cost would be feaslbte for properties on the oDposlte sides of each street. • D. Environmental Assessment: Upon review of Part I of the IM tial u y an comp a ono art II of the Environmental CAeckllst staff hes found no significant impeets related to the development of the proposed warMouse/industrial buildlnes. E. Freeray LandscaDin9: In the general vicinity of this project e rth ells approximately 30 feet above site grade. For that reason screening o1 this protect, particularly roof tops and loading/work areas, has been a critical concern. One way to provide the additional screening to accomplish this 1s to provide landscaping within the freeway right-of-way. Staff has discussed the idea M th officials at CalTrans and found that planting Dy others on CalTrens right-of-way 15 ailowed through the enerwchant perwlt process and is to be Sutded by a Master Planting Plan. The Dl strict Landscape Architect will furnish the Master planting Plan through the City where planting by others /s proposed. The City Engineer has request the preparetton of the Master Planting Pi an; however, the pLn 1s not yet campiete. The planting must be approved by Cat Trans aaa maintained by others for a 20 year period. Final details have not been worked out, but 1t appears that the City will be assuming the 20 year maintenance responsiD111ty throu,li a landscape maintenance district. d~7 PLANNING COMA SSI STAFF REPORT DR 87-26 - J. Benmant Development fo. September 9, 1987 • Page 5 III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Th15 project is consistent with the Industrial pet c an an the &nerai Plan. The protect will not be detrimental to the ayacent properties or cause significant environmental Impacts. In addltton, the proposed project together with recommended conditions are in compliance with the Industrial Specific Plan and Ctty Standards. IV. RECOIMENOATION: Staff rccammends approval of Development Review Conditions of the adoption of the attached Resolution and Approval and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Res tfutly submitted, Bro u C1t Planner BB:DN:vc • Attachments: ExhlDit "A' - Site Utilization Nap Exhi6lt "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C' - X-Sections ExhlDit 'D' - Building Eievatlon lA -..tit Exhibit ,~. "F' - uG .l uii~y El e.a iiva in. lE, - Building Elevation 1C, 1D Exhibit "G' - Building Elevation 1F Exhibit 'H' - Building Elevation 1G Exhibit '1' - Bull ding Eievatlon IH Exh1D1t 'J' - Building Elevation 2B Exh1D1t "K' - Bulldtng Elevation 2C Exhibit 'L' - Building Elevation 20 Exhibit "M' - Landscape PLn P1anL Ltst Exhibit "N' - Landscape Plan (Lots 1-al ExhlDtt '0' - Landscape plan (Colt 5-"; Exhibit 'P" - Landscape Plan (Lots 10 and Exhibit 'Q' - Landscape Plan (Lots 11 and Exhibit 'R" - Conceptual Monument Slgnage Exhibit "S" - Gonceptual Greding plan Exhibit "T' - Tree Ramowl Penait Exhibit "U' - Existing Tree Locations Resoluti on with Conditions of Approval 1J one 2A 13) 121 a~~ ~i CITI' OF ~~~ C[ICAI'~tOIVGA txvt~toty a~q try rr~', ~!_ m~:51TE !?/L/Z'AT/D~c/ FXNtST: ~_ SG4~; ~^ :i _ - :; - -,- - - ~_.~. e.=. ....~.~~ .. .. w, .,..,..„, . e <,.. ~ u ..., ri f i .-=~ `~ ~ a :'- 1 _ ~.~; i i ~ ~ , _~' r ij n `~ f ~~ ' ~~- 4- .~ _• ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ : ~ L~ i6!'- .: }` -- - ~[ i ~ ~b ~_ SiAg K _ ~ ~~ tii7.~ 'p T 1 .-"AR J ~i --- -~a.. i3 =_ il!55.8 _ _ _a FC + ~ ~ -3- - _'i f t i .. i pi -S _. -- R -~ 3 _ (1 -~~~ '1 -F_I `- _ __ T ~i _ - i - _ =,i- i __ f iii. . i ~ ~' - e;~g x i i ~.- . ~ _ r_ `, i j~ s` • s 3 - /, N 1~~ .~.--'-' - f t -y ' •' ~~ - i> ,..~..r~;.~= ~-fix. ., ~\`.~9Y/,p ma" -.~lx W'~.(('iy ita-~, -_,!iws w``...';' y _-' i. •~if~g P -'F ,y m iii -li ti /' ~ ~ ~ '~ i rx ; ~ y ~ _ ~ ~ ,. ,.-_~ ~ . - a. _ --~"a__ VORTF R ~,~, ~ ~,~~ rte,, G1PB'!-?_!o ~ R.niv~vmtc txvtsiav'~'~~ rr;~:~l~ Px,4~ exHierr: _ B~ ~: ., ~,,.~', ~, .._~ Li ~u sW •WM 8..~.Y . J ~] aYwc rlwe • - -J 7~ f A •~ '. V u A 1 5 H N ~ ~~ ~I a '~ N 1 e e {~ Y 11 .. ~ Y G ~~ 1 1 „ Y Y Y$f N ~3 Y • •,_„ ~J1f Vy~•' •M~1 ~` - RA1VC,'HO CLJCAMOnK~1 PL.Afr':~iQHG DN610N ~, ~~ rr~: X ,~lyoy~ fXH19T~ ~~ SCAIE ~~. ..... ....~.a. ~~.,.-_..~...~...~ Mp~MIW ~fi YN~ NMIYIW4~LL dM~' ~OCW~A YI/h1 iqM~ Ir 1~ / ~. eiroNO a xonlrl ELf WTON ^-- ~'A . i OlRDf10 /A VEST ELEVAi10N ~1~1Y d V 00~ ft/ Y ~'/ sIRDNA7 1A EgRN EIEW~\TION • Ji 01/Iallq 1A fAET ELEVATION V ~~ C[TY OF R.~'VCHp CUCAMONGA PI.AIVNWG DNLSbIV rr~: OR B7-Z~o ~ ~rme. EGEV.4flOA,/ 1~ EXHI~1'~ ~ ri('aI F: I~c~ ...~.:~:: --:::,M - ~._:.r.... ~. ~ Mt [eMe~ -eO~.NIW~ ev.w WY : e i -•WtY .eYM wwW n nu . . ~ _ - _ .,t I _ eVILOMq AMeT ELEY'A1101L '1% eu1LDIN0 90UTN ELlVATIgI :: _, : .e.. v. e .eew.. uw-~ • I .y euLOINO lAei EI.lVATION - _~- eUIDINe NpI1T11 ELEVATION /~ ~f 1.11 i ~./l~ R.A.'vC'HO CLJCA1~10NG~A R.A.~vrrnvc [xvts~o~v rte: O'Q 8'1'2!0 m~tE: ~~'Yr~T/~N 1B. IE.1. ~~-s~ 1~~ ~®~Y -1 ~p~ Y~O~ I~Y~ ~~ ~YW0s4in ~~y ~i~M1Yn1V 1i~PW~ ~ I~tr4i 1C VYE{T UEW710M ~~Y 11O\ V ~~~ Y~V ~1 MIlGN10 /C SWTM ELEVATION • ..1 • ~;T' i EUIDINti i0 EA&T ELEVAl10N ~Z'1' ~ RAIV(,'Hp CLKA.MOrK=A RarJxavc avc~onr .~4 V ~T ~; DI 8T ~; V O G D Exr~®rr ~ scl+~~ siwnwo a honor EllMI1710N q UIIIM . L 1I u f ~'./ _ a4Dlq i EA6T EILVATIpI .rr~a~n __. .rr~eosn 1y1~ IOYIY ~ ~ ~ ~IIMIK~~01Y ~C01~ ~~ ~y~ Y/A~ wr.~na r~a~- NRD~q rt IgRN N~VAATON : Mialq ~ MOflll fLlWOnN lIYL~tl 1r WE1T !LlWTIOp V ~ ~~ ~~ 1 1 \Ji' Rf~.'v(Z-b C~1' ~ti~avc avt9av rtFM: OR B7- Zlo mtF.: ~~ EYgT/oN iF ExH®rr: _~ sctE: ~~ ...~~ - -- ..~,o.. .e.,,.,,....~.,o -~:~.,,o. --- .,. wa.a w w....uvA,aw - _- _~~,. - __-- ~~ OVM.pla t0 Na11N fuVAtgN //j/V//-y. ,~`~()I `l'/ ~~ -~~V ,I' i ., ~ • ?~~~ ~ULDMq 10 WT 4tVATION -' -- -t •WIDMq 10 OIXfM fLLVATgN V CITY OF RANCHO C'UCA~'VK)1VGA PL.Af~IIVQNG DNlS~Y ~: OR 87-1~0 ~: ~l.~i/ATi~ON 1U FXH~'1': _CLr SCALE `1 C' :;°~~ ~~ ~~ ~Iw O~n~ ,....^s..~, - _,-~^ ~,.. su~clNO w NOg711 ELEVA7pN • IOW IAA V ~0~ q~M -~ r _ __ I/_~~ _ _11 __~ BULDMI0 1N EAS7 ELEVATION ~1N.01110 111 !011711 EL[VA71ON V \ ~~ 1.1 J I Vl' RANCHO CUCA1~iONGA PLAIvNIIVG DNL4gV ~Mi D,E' B'7- Z!o EXH®7': ; SCALE: <'~~~ M~~q lMi ~/ ~~~~ _ Iu~~~~ ~~NN1~ ~NNN W W ~~iwt~Ota4 MON uN~ -yu~~~ NY~~~ yHu _ ~~ . __ 1 _ _~ _ . _ . f___~__ _ _.~_-.. suLara. lASr euwnoM luLara LI~ RA.~1Cf-KJ CL1C"A1~IONGA ~ati~rrvc avtsaty Wlt/ ILLVATION ri'F,M: ~ 81' Zfo ~: ~/'AT/O/V ZB ExH-ar~ ~L_ scn~. • Nay NLL M~~W u WN~M ,~ ..~,,,...~... ya.,.,..._ MNy~n~~ yNN1 NYN~/~~ itlW~ tObyyWyy~~~• ~4~Iii Ontpi~~uFn~uO~~ 1 ie~n e~~ .-, N / ` /y~\~ Mfi l -.N.,......, K,..,,Y. . ..~.... Y„...... _..,.. ~, .._. _ .~_ s111t.Dlolfi pL NOII7N [l[VATIg1 • ' ~~ ~~~ .N,Y..N..... ~N. ~~~ - `~ - EU.DINO TL WEdT.ELEVATK uYIN ~00~ Nw ~1 •~1 L~Y~~~O11~ i~~i~~~0i .'~-- r _. U~ /URDIIq 2G [AET [LEYA ~.a110 7GE7VT1 KEWTION /\ ~f R '~CJ'HO CLJCAMONCu~- ~: O,Q $7- 2!0 rrn~: EIE~'.PTk~.V ZG PLANNQVG o(vl57oN ~cttterr: -f~ scwtE: W~~Y ~YAY MGM ~~ OA~~Ny ~~Ar ~YY~~H ~ ~mNM N~~ i ~~YY~~ f yY~ AM \W1 H CMiN~~ r~ - it '~ j ' i i~1 r ~7~~7 ----' a ~ULLDN10 ffJWlST E~EYATON ! ~Ril~"" - .e.r ~r- eu~ara 2DeA:re-cvAnoN ~~ ~ RA.'VC.'HO CLK'AMONGA ri.Air~vnvc avcsiav ..,~ sa~aea Zpna~rn cuvAnou r1 LJ [~~ VOR'T ITEM: OR87-ZOO • rrttE: ~yAr~or/ 2D extuerr: ~_ sc.~: lUIOMq SQIOUTN !LlVATroN ~ ~ I/~~^~\ `V~ ~1 ~~ R.4.'vC,'I-IO CT.JG~.'NONCxA R.nti~rvc avts~av ~y~: OQ 87'1!0 rmF: GANP.SCS1oL EXHIBT~ _ SCAIE X01. ~- R 'vCHO CLJCA.I~ONGA '- - ~~ ~ ~: ~ P[A'~7i[I~IG DNL901V FXHISi': '7 r ~ SCALE ~, ~~ soar M H ~C N ~ ~_ i i 2 0 J i ~ '. ~ ,"~ a <~~ S. ~~ t `~ Z L `~ !/// •~ _ ~~ , .J, y .. ~~~ ^ 7 ~-+w--- ~...._ _ - ~~ ~ ~ ti r RA.'vC'HO CL'G-~ at.,,.ti~v[:vc orvtvcx~. ,~