The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1988/04/20 - Agenda Packet~. CITY COUNCIL ACaEIVI~A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:30 p.m. l J Apr11 20, 1988 Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Aoad Rancho Cucamonga • ~ City Councilmembers Dennis L. Stout..aa~~o. Pamela J. Wright..Ha,~o.rnrr.M Deborah N. Brown, co~~nrmemer. Charles J. Buquet co~.~uM.ma<r Jeffrey Ring. co~~mm.me«. 5 ~ i Lauren M. Wasserman, o.. .Nnnago Jsmes ,,".4arks~aa. o,~•.,,~m,~ Beverly A. Authelet, crrc cr:.k II City ice: 989-1851 Lions Park: 980-3145 Y < 1 6 < x 0 S <¢ i .- o°ovo°o °om°om°Om rvo°n°o ami°o°°+~~on~ionm°ra°°°n°o°pm°°+ L 00m+n NOwPmOOmOryryNNNP NNp rv~.~i .<r la-na aL I r NNm Nr.f nyNm NNy y~ f -~P ~+~n mn rn.<r~ai=mmo•.Nn+Naraao~rvn+mar mo•o..N n+Nahmm W~+uauaac.o°°e°aa°uomoa ar°-or ~o°Or ~r°-r°°rsr~n~r~~r~ NrvNryNNNNNNN NNNNNryNNNNNNNNNNNN NrvN NrvNNrv NNNNNNrvryNNNN NNNNNNryNN . ¢ P LW w c z wa a .. n o~ i ~n~ a 0 Y u •.. V W Ni o V u z > > YZVUV >`>pp~ °O<i¢aJ N wW¢ VJp06 m ¢m¢ W_Yn w m n22 n< .Ni2mS < n !\ mirtl- ¢W moo 0 0 0 a o -c "aN pvz. ic.vVW Wn~ PaNo •+p NW y JrN tln n0.•1~ so~ W fONi NrN~ N„ Yp„: n.za ~amm JoWmwi -u z ~rc o~w W F of oua" ~. mU ¢ N O W V -ON~n020w >r10 Y w¢ "~uM~w¢ °Z%rw~a ~liJ ~i zyw .-v uz ~i uut`i< » r~<~ruiY" 6jK h4w7CF whKwKZ rrOawe» YJY20w ~w<y6<~Jww>22p>QyU<w¢<Ww<w<tWW ¢<YSwy<60•+<NOZOM1imm 06¢mNmz + ! ~, i ~_ i ¢ 2 O NJ W V . 6 ~ UUp V N VLL YU f w plZi¢ wJ ¢Z z O L ~o cNC.. o i - z1 ¢ z> NV 2w O YW6 WI~-i ~Q6 V_t_fwJFy w _ _ GGU OZNYW wOpWmY Zr wOf YG N~U SwiUL2z2wPWw RW~j2¢6 WY1i N aai°u ¢•6-~W ii~wooiouwii`o 21 ZO¢~uz.~o` ~iWw~ouoi<nz¢iu. i~uWivommmwmiW~ i°w zpwv¢ze~¢ .. ..nm Jr zo •'iu~oiwour<~iom~iWi woVauz °uo~ r<¢a •WOO Ya¢.~~aaNWNOi.Ni w.z.~i~.`.iii ~<t l<t «<~<t ««OO Wmm'/J YOmODUU mOP~nNI~IN P+aN~hnnNnNh a.y 1-tim +~ NPOPnOOaO N.~O NO40m+rh~aOrnPn a rv oaoaa ahNa as aararoam YN~aYPm« JWNNd Y^PP •1J1 PPPmPPPPPm PYWUY m0«WOPWWNmW+mmmUPmPNamyy..10 YNOOJMOP mWYmma~yoN«N:aYyNNymYaNNO+WwYOOa~aomY ZMTMZ>TTyyO~OOOLO~pC(fn,lC CmmODOOr N~ni2ZnTT CtrpiC Z> AHT~TNmN>Fnny2'~ Nn<»>ASSNS~aKAT2~Y N2rr+nm KyP TSZOZ« O> mKA •SS ZK)C A r2TOTImTpT ~NOimnG>+NN ONY UriLnNZZ2n .Yiozlnii°n ~°" "~ '^z win Tz 9Y• pm n m< iosopp nz<PZnn «a mz N imw ymzc»s<aicnnizie m" zi )<1)niiv om>zm«svny% ysp«mny «9y >o>«Nronr>yaT> zNTa °N nn°iei ~~°o ~rao9nnnT«~z roT•rz raarn m>o No mz m-1 N.A.°n%ai«~ r ampmr Mroo % y> 9c mczrrw P>a r Ny• O_KAa rY ym qm Sy»yn OOwmOSO mom 1° N<_Op+nnm> _T y0_mn2N Z « aT p « >!N 00 T«Mmn Y„O Y A S m A 2 ZN mf p O Z ZC 9[ > NO C n • n2 < Y y yy A n P m N Z ` C m T. A n n r G A2 n m mn N I M P m O Rl agzazmmaioio.°.s.y.~.y. ~g~KPmmmmcio.>.imsmi4c ~mmr'~im i cnviimc°P+"~m.A.iwmmi~~Ym ycTTeymiA is aismacc TZC .i. i.Y-I ~rwy9TOO•A>mr OCTNNyZmD OOAO an >OOOyYOp00 Im «Ony y921•>OZN «N W mOir C>mK ~ IS nNZ IPAn ZNrOmyY AIt AN nnCn )A9 nfN>Znnnn_ 1 timiNiNy OSNO OmA ~oMrZr % rmrrrr m > > O TTy Z ~YOnr NN«> rrNCNmyryNNNN IN N nNN N>nf OA> ON T T y ss nN ~` w W A~9NNTN ONNrNN>O n e ~22> r3 Aa p~ S O CwTO ti IA rT Mq ^ 09 My TNAF :~~TP •O ; p Y )10A ~ yi ~ A nl9r H2nm0 PZ 1 O 9yC %T ~ f%4 mwGr N> 1 O• > N r O >nmT mN> T DO N J P rN A • 1 Nn • y~<•I ` mn Im' d CO u0 rm A9 1 n nnNn(laN °n m9nFnmmFT~ n ~nno =•an~ nm I 00yO ` O ONO OOOtO O OCr N Z m n •1110 .-lnyyy nYy ~ YN y 1 iTxxma ~z T S zzz z z ziN y .>ii I >m ~.~ msmmm wmmz c pY o Ymya aY«n ao 1 z TTmT n> T9TTM y J N Z 33 3 •2 3 S 2TSZT 2 32 1 NN N N N NZNNN N N NN NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN 1> ~ pvyiM V+iN~iV~iq NUUNJJ+J N+)+WNYOamwWwuyiWwwwNNNNNNNNNN iy O OdmMPNJWNYOamyP •.PN+wNwOamyP N+.uNYO • Z O 1 Y N I> 9 a In JwN PP • 1a I)On J.a NOwLNmOytiyOPNNN+NaP..rW P-lymwYNNN«NrN+ 1> NWN+NV1.atiJ.0 y0ardN«+aPPOWPONNWPOOrYPNPNa N NOdPOPWyNP WNONpPY+~W •IONmO•IOY+mNNOOWNNN XIO OYNONNOm000aP00~•pdmp~JOOrO•IONNyOPOON°OOOV jy 2 vooaopoonorvm-ornPn..n oa.-oopo+o po~~n°nv ~°no~rommonoNOm nmo m.., o~-n a..+Pw~-mooomaa m .eon ~.. o,.. m oo crh-.°n r m -. ,v yr rv i . .. '„ hmPO-.~.mvma~mPO.-~rvm vm a~-mPp..rv mv,~. al-mPO-. ~1 aaFaaaaaah~-.-hh>h~~-i-wmmma PPPPPPPPOOm < NNnrvNrvnryrvNnNNNN 31 rvn.vN.~nNNrvNNnNNNrvrvrvrvrvrvNrvrvNnNrvrvrvrvnNn.vNrvrvrvNN U O V O ~ti v r r O iL K.-r Z m ~P K LLpRmNILY ESN N< Zh2W< plp Y uSN x O2rU p YtJ pm i <h+ _n • ~+ O O p >~ VW yW WVQ>i WU W Ww~WW WYO W s um~ a ax< ~~ie o- " mswm J ~.. rh_i2 N hZ` H W Nt h o _ wLLmrO S V^ i ~pw0 Na4~ Up?ON~NN Y wZW wp-.lrv ~:o ~o< > ~aJa .o as a J< Nuaxl ~awm mxs<wa m :,~ ,,.n JPW~ ~., ~°_ NzNS i h.~~Nw<°aNN O.,.N`,~~ s ,. lINNU oiNpt ipwmz> z~Nx~ <i~<..` ~W m". w.iu PmW uuazYupusW z- >.>wW Vy WuWi >oa.JiW a ..<Wx o< ep ~.~p~wpsn`ioopwo .h.au m.ioorpu ~n°wN ~»om~°N.~N~oi»>a~W O'~"o.-~i Wit~~au»rcw+i mWU.I ~. ap~.ayw moaw Nor.uWmoY ~..>s+wo><m J 1'J ¢wwiwo amou <~..wJ<mN a»wNm¢,WC O~uicvasN maWasw <uu+.w.masaJavux N z _ i w r u _z sw Nuu io a uW z ~ .~.... V VY ZU ZUU E _ v r>i Z o O ~ >i w~ H.n W L f 6J ~O «LL'UO2 4JrN-IOJIYOf J VI {J <RSw6 GI-122202WOJ <W ON aV `VNwNVW6UWZrZ S< ZZ_ LL02<W WVJ~Ow2 V CftiVLLw fV Swan iY lZR'. Y~< NYJVSf + 1 =C ONNwR i>w< INKY J.+NI-2ww .W wK<w m~SrWyZ6N 1 <WOZ 2~-LW iwi2>UUHmJ62 pN 1ZwmWVJ1+6m m 1 ZLLUV~V6ZUV<VppV22V6'.L~i2WO~+N~riiNUmLYGNJJOO a YI al hynmr r-mN ~~~-oryr..m ..r ammmra~rvmNnvarv rNaaaN.+ro + ~ as°m~-maaa a~caomaca.o °c ap~ano~a-aic~aPOOamaon.o+m°N 3 uPF wPOPJPPOM~yNwPy~~jW±P,mP+P PPmP qP PPPq Oar uZ.y qqP ymP ywryr NJr GLWNmO~gy yPlOp ruOyyNy+qJ.m yrNryNwmgONNNrm mrWPPNy+Oy TNtir2TmYm)Y>~9L220T> ZOOx>I.nT>Aa» CN>f~>ti >yOn<OZ.KO yAZpxZymalymmCA>-In yNrrZXNnaAJ m,.#In _ ZONyrym>yT m• A2n" 2NON' _OpOOT>_Sx_R NTmrONZr mr yr Mmr mON~+ym m rylm r 2 T 2ra S YATti rOK frNnnO}O mTmmxO m n Nm n orv aNTyNC\om ro ziz n_ N an> is?yc.m~.>i~ mxzyzi~m ai<N myz..zn j°m sp Nil'~iii~o s Nmrmy m• Y ooJ[ziy mr~~Ar nnnci>ASy nr miNm T m >NiYrnc>mrF sr zrrvyao on irc voT n rmNrnNa. of ymzN i>arrrnT vm osrimTmnN ~'c T .. r~cmrrTZn » a>yvN ao o_ iA O_T v .. pi TNS iN _ FCynF> O A m ' nrK minK -Z{ m '+ OAr ra LO NJt nl 00_ Amin ZZ 2 NC 9 O 2. NOmO n T YZT ^n tiS mGr O Ay 'ni i n ~ N Nn im o ~ i a y> on oomoy NnTN>rmNO AOPNTSmnPPNmmNmPanaa~va x2T\13ip A~nm T>SSnmGYi>~~pp YTY>p TN U>iTimm >m COTINOT+TNOZSAm9m~TmMHMfIN FNTTT OTTS C COOT>rrOrAmCnmT22 ZCm~n yC_ ymmCw>OCS~ rmmrrOSOZ S2rA0'nZZVrOtiw ~ZAm~ ~P ZrZ2mY a^ O'O' n> yT10>NA m O pO~rKO>DOOSm 'uNiy N 1mAT TN SZ N>m nOr Om 'I y L>On nYY mN nTmrCr>n >r^nr~>n1Pnn O n0 >29rTr yPL ~2 r m90^r>r ~VOiiT ysn mN~NSN NOO2y 1np >O ~nrrN U>i~rrM <N 9m JO O_f ZYZNysTs Nrn A rpammNmNO12 r NfON~C mT QNOOTN N'T rONp NYm TNrNNN O L> OM 'P tiT ZT(] nTT ~>>N n Omr myF SrOZ ny.~ y}Y+" 2~+ N r T N~ H<N<A > iN N9n '~n .F M> OYr r» Nm Tm mzmT y : ro > a, y xr` Wrr zr m y lr TN e` gWG +WW OT nNr ~ i z n n Nn ni ro >1' iao "1' me on c v n rv py io ov S> f O ~ n nw nS Wnn __ > m2 ~ ~ TD -1 rN PP - m ~ r2P y r~i 1 ti y = m J NN N N vi Ua TH Nin N NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN PJWPmw wWmmNIDNmNNNmmTr6YmrPYYYPmm¢PNmmID NPN u00o0000O Nr-O ym-aW V.I wNU O.(m yPV+wNrO.C R.I h'u`t+~.w Nr O~PPyP V~+wN N~YO N+JNyWwP~P .pnm WUP u00+OfwANrp WU:m WWaPWWP~O O NONr+NNwP+~OP NOONOO POOpWWOWPyP °oo°o moo o.+-°o omm°o om oNCOay°:ou°o°o°o°o °o oo°u°o~°oo°ouo °omi 1 i 1> P ~m 1 m 1 n O C r T A 30 • C f 1 mOONa1 ~I'O ONOOmVU'OOOYU•gOtl•-OOw000-•NVOOOPO •10 POnnN900PpLL•a'!I-OU•Orvrvp O.+rv OOO.rPOPmrvO VOPmPOJ 00^s mmN 'J ~+ m m -~ •• ~+ N O Y L U 3 V i Pq-•nn.rN a~mPpi.ouaaaiam~~mF n`~ra-~n-~°m mmm mmmmm~mmmmmmmm mmmmmammga NNNNNNNNNNnNNNrvNnNNrvNNNNNNNNNNN LZ wT L yi Yn~ ~Z3 F .~ u r 6K K6 1»-K Z O Q RK¢ VwZ w_ ~u w_ 62 w_ Np[ _ ___ ¢m F D m K{ ZW Z O O Op m00 NO O w0 O OOOJ W W V WW WmVV OW W~ W WVVZ im O Z< N <H r <VVi V i•4 JF i w \ Z N U ~U ~n __ a + gT N rr u .'. zn 9f N~- u ..u z.-m .~ < ° iiLL :, nj~ a < uo q z zw Nm° <r•• u ouaNwm .• w° w yaa~N•znH ~rc~a ra VwwNLLN»NN sq zoWy~.. j~.n .-<qJ i< J Iii~z~wq{ U<O~'J yw Z6~ uVw ZUN VVNN60J »V»620UJUr NV V V6ZyV •• OZOiUOyJw¢<LL»Z _ O<OSVO iwJUrJ6 »i~ywH00¢¢•- O.ZiJ<Jm72w~2 ~~n7JVP 6.w ~•JiYj up»N([LL W<2Vruuuiw VOyu.n ? OLLKmLL u¢r KLLm¢Iml-~VOOYN¢mZ6ZKH6UN¢N<YKVOim Vpmm¢<36 Z n VVUU~ V r n•Z223 W O OGOO u > V r Rg000 J J O OZ n O FKp •r ~ P r »{«< zz ue ~i <o i u ~~ Hor ~u ma'aam z» NoLLWm .. zgnN mua ~LLO~o uii ~ ua> aoNFN NJq i~.{- .N-i sin.»i~o oNw 2<O ••:W Ot»JM • p VgLO N IJJJJQNi <Q{<wiW wK~•S -w I m 2100aQNLN»LLZ Fw UJ ayJ YtsOS2a LL<~UV OS F_•NU {VUUUJ»L_O N6N»•<n UN<rMJZ .00~~ WOZNZ6N Nr»6___i p J OYM62N<O mNR»NZNjWLLLL6w<NNZU{~WSLWWwWwy ~<~w w6a220. IWW6m»4mOON y ZNZNN ZZSINOwq i{Zy0 VUUJY {Z 2WwJp oottM J r.rr i» :WmfRZt<fWf<Ww <•y+00V{f{<OWNW{S FIJ20~000<Yr< °apnzaav~a a~zimm ~Nm mV:N NNC ~r-4,NN»NNSNNNNNyNNr omnaPi-ama o..r oaPamnonrv n~e~ni-..nnnm»~-•-m..anm n oaa»mommn»..~Y•.orn»mya»mm »mNa~Nn»»»»NYno N-°•.N...ar °~aai N,°~.°..a.•.a•"~.".•~.a. .a. .a.~:w:"•.ae a..am mNm^am~ S W aPP yPOPalPyNlP~lPmWPP POPPP waNj+OVrOPOwNryPOaNOdNWNlNyW ra bmy-.NrwNmWmrwaPnranwmplo NNm'OrZ NTLZZnT«y<GfCCyM1ym T On»}ZSmm»<rnrp>}T22D}T> mjaZTMN~FD>Ar}r%yy>y~22nZnnry%A SO y2OenP 2nr'ZyN FY0 TAXI Y TOyZ~-rT <}ZMmTTT y(1 0> OZSZ irZf MZ. SO iypAO A O~tn000 Zr im0 YO'O <n Z CC y~ > p OnrN~~~Tm FDyY m>pn yZZ nTD T DmrrA ZAAC} yDtiy y n>IT TNNn ZTm yDrOmNnrt>2Y Opt ~ nimNGm2 <ppNTrp Nn~ r<>w> ~ M>yu0i~1'~ m0>y Kr~N m O O n> A A Dm nD Dnn Nf 2 G22 n_A Sn fmp ZO r0 n No r °a z n on mo N 2n i m „~ N o T~ANDATO>T>mT>ZmN~<.TyfOflmZ>~T>m OSr UTrOiT2T3 TyTrnOCTT«TOOTNnTTNT n~D'F r2 y2CmTD2wyT2nOSAmZ<yn ~ o o~orrN oz onzeNTOD p o -maim nonai~i~NCT in~inN~y nzi N.n- n c mPO NTir~~m„~~osNNiv ~cN H Tzmo eNZ V v cNSA~z T~>n q NANy~CpN~mNNT>NjPNI AN N T 1 ND my " `m ~ Dy m~ i ~ r N m n N y x n~ N T N c .zD. A ' « To a < ~ i WO A S > nnNn mmn ~ mi o 0 z o <>o ~o oo v,~ < i n mF iim i m We r N i .- m ..-- o n P\ Z y~r mn N n Ve 1 m YS• i N N m NN NNNNiN N~Np N,NpNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNNN daU800p000yydP000PPOmOPmbPPO 08 addd.O ddddPPbmPP N.r.O aC-~P i*.n wN~' dm-~PNJWN"Od P-~P N,. r v R raOmarR000POr'PPr.JW mJPNNVN WOOWPmOaN.IrP PNO.IN WPONNNmP m Pir00000u0000yrOOMOOwgOONOO~JO e ~ P m o n C > 1 b s V LL O OOV PLO [l NLnh0000v m~OrOOmvNNON0000 O 000hP0 NNOnhPm.rP rvmPOV NI-w000 n PnNYmO YOpvu~^.~iv vP~-mP hinOh n Po ::o~~=~momh..-.m h i i "nroo .. :nm,l. n _ m r ¢i 1 O O O N~ Si ~ ~ P v < V 3 V u\<hmP mmmmPPP?PPPP pim wP W1`w0 rv¢lNJ Q vi ¢Vjw_ ~ u ° ~~ ii ° ° o ~o W u u sQCeai m207<S SI R ShQPV6 VS F OS 2Y1 w0 i m ii"I+a¢ ° W ZZ61L S L OwZ 3~+i0u~ 3 V WUi-aL >wCN w V 6~6J¢ N < ONiaW[>V 0. y n24Y N S Y 2 mN¢3r0 2 O 5 u u ~ i t O O Y 1 6 r nn O r Z u o s .. o ¢ a ~ izJ i a ,,, <~. Z V~ 2Y i N 30w6JU < V W LL LL2CJ W < Y V Y¢~VN¢ O M FOm t3 U N w mOG~N CU00~ ¢.m-i O .. m O.~ nn 3 om >' ~ o u° iu Nn N. RON¢ HN IJ P h ¢pY2 J¢OH mJ Z¢O ht0 St •O~"21 N n<4YNJLL r<w JONiNNrvNOw __<u~iN¢ <7WwnN ONrrc ZN'ON¢UZ mh>1 2?V~P 2¢w <¢ouJi i.N+WLLOiM °¢Y,:"io~i~u°LL Yj <ON¢OM1w LLNN °OZV ~O WU Z~N2U<YS~42¢«JO wZJ ~O¢>OZwV%2w y0.JJN yNjyWVJY< WOGw<¢O6<wWNYU J.y2UW<¢C¢NU m J ..V<m 0.0uSO+~K6~"~jti O~1-'NO¢.~4UU~upQ~~m~6OQ6¢U< 6 <_ H U< m_ N OWV <_Z V b ~-2 > U N ~2H 4N.°n OY 6ji .2 2• J26 OK< J w ^ S'Z= ~Up !' ZW N¢N.'~< 6r,~'26hV >UU` ZYt wN J<WOWCC}}W Ow3 1V .+~.Z'IL JWWNR69~u ¢>JW0000 pYUZN6 w<0.N0 NFN202 'J JLLJLLO N~JW<° i¢w ~Z <¢ V a out <¢ isaor waz<a WjLL r0y<~OUS< ~V<1m~~n(NW 6iNWNYnM>«ZWJOO¢W Q1L '~iOHV W <yVVI-fhW hI~JOOmNJi6<O `O p?= ««{<t<N«~<iR«mmmOmZKm mF ! N lPN NONIP WN~mmnP nP ~NmhmOlytilil Pl.ly N!'IN ti J ! m m0! ! O Pn LPNryhmOdM1~P Lm Pp 7 rPr yr~rJmrmO rly NNy PO'~IOP d PpPr PPyrJ pNdPNJJ 1.pWyyyNWSdrmmmNpJOPrJWdprrjrPddJOp dNdPrPy °1"IO.T..T.a mo i.°.a°m imioA nc nn~i .N.oioc.^..^.mmmsmi>iii:~^ Tmizzm}zPNmrASS..n °p n~rl+nroy3syyAZ nn~~b>mrrrl-rrn 02y1mnnm=T^Z~S.(fA SMFmCCKCrAim>TTTNT>m nNm>n>TnO2N~>OP fly2 nPO T.3.m N'~.>-n yn~Aa>~• OY SZmA n ZOnPPPOPyZAnZSm > 2Zy<=C 2C>T - 2}N I~mZOm20>f}}My }-~OO~LA2 r~yrm 3 N A> 2yTr1 N>Tnr' C~>y>"~ »2»} OPm ~°y.G. ~ ~o° >i.G.~m_maT ^ato+P ay~o~Ox iy.~a^.iNCmiria yo ~} o~ y c y SLLi i z Nmmm i°c»<mm~ a o Nmm y>s> n oaN -.a.. ~..mao ~m - < c n mn ryti~ y yy~ z za r n % n °m i _ i° ~aaa _ {_i' }oP i m>~Nr`z, } S SSA A Gm • Z > G n 000 C A Snfl v omN N o0 ~s° p y n - °c izz TP (1 m yyy N NG Z mC2~ c n n N n n rcy y • • m 22 y mn N P A• O OTN mArv~NALLTSmCmO3PmyA9GGSmnPNaY}O~ANP}NNyN<S N OPII~mOCr>r1.ImYrm~rr fmOTrCP}mmTnC>Cmr> 2nTOTZCNMNPmTFnCT>nZGT2TTTAOmMT3TymKrZyD rYir YmZmi~mnnTm>2pmj2p.(~rl20ZZrn >OZZ~ flO HYOm mNNfn02 ff11ZACPOf~-IO iwPO° OAPO1 >cNl°LO ^~'-ISArm ••~yn^AOTmmmn in >Oay>nm=Trm n nWTP `S oN R ^ oP n~YA aTY PiYm NY A"Nynll 2 TT mONNHF1.lOPn(°1N JNC yyTn>9S„ <N\ yl>I~TN O_OmCmy iF O>rNyN m2T j~NmONyi[C _w ynf LOmCHNN SNO OTPAm Fmnir~mayyCYy R n OrZiN °D>~2PyPW >FZ}YY my mYA°P 9P- MPr>O i pr9P mTr-~N J. ny G NP J ~ONy NATSq Fn tO>NO » a2 OtiW~ 2Th~ O TMw >n r aNM >rYL wP P _ r mSON ~z o rm >no-z og~e~o m ~ ° a ~°mi •Y n•+ iA Tiymti PNNI Aa N AZPm =yOs TN n mn ~n PnZne nnnnn3nnnnnnnnnnnC ^ <SA O ~-O i0000P0 000 2 Or j[T _ rl{ y Ny y pyy~ti\_y{Y4yyyyR~ T A O 3 AT NO OmTTTy r3mTTTTrT~p ST T +• m n P~ wT'nd aTTT N2 r~ C mt n S 3 ~SS3 RSSS3 A NNNNNNNNNNNUNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNUNNNNNNNNNN :odddaddddddmdddddud a.o d.o .oa dsddddddd d.yddddd pP-~y-eel-~~wN/yPPPPPPP PP PO •n STN P•nV WM1rN+J+++ V+WU~-OL P~+'P •~ Ody ~vP ~n1wN/ d6~+ + OdP+~P V1 NdN.I.rO PP d JO mdPrPOrw NNwP NPOVWwPP1 /ONm dd d-n WO-10NPm~wPYwrvyONPrNNmmwW00/PmOtiJNN~1W YON0 oa.U~a i..oaii:.o:.i~~*~ns o~nv n+o ono eouHr s;nooo a:.ooos OrNwONONNwyO+00rdOWTwNOPOdOOPOm00000J0000 r Y K w 1 m pm 1 !~ s s A O E C 8 n OdnOOrv ryOVPVOOPnOm0000mOrOaOVO000m0 aOmPm000POmNONOaNPOrO00000~m m nmro~- .r ii-o i~no ..o m~-.: ~-odFimi~.:m oo~.: o~o ~.: a oa~~uram m moo N PP n n .. u'mN - mN N ... rm+ ..~ r o V R1 mPOnrvmvN.p PO«Nm+N.ph 9POrnmvN.ph 9POrn nlvN .p .YPPPPPPPPPP0000000000•. n•. ..rr-. •. r•.NNNnNnN 6i PJPPPPPPPPPPPPOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOd00 i <I tJ Si NNrvnnNNnNrvrvrvrvrvrvnNrvNrvNNrvNnrvNrvrvnNNnNrvNNnNrvm U O iZZ ~Z 22 P r L ._. r r Y ti .a ..~ n J r-i < mY rZ .nK RY OR ¢O n ___ PV NSS OS 0 SW ~L <V 2 o `W Om YR~o m~co `]OU w R oR o¢a.Q~mo S YSUNr~ WWWOrVZY6m 22 _2__O OWN+ryNKO«OiHYt_N 7_Ow 02m<m mm 'O ONNJ« !« »wr.O V ~ ~: ¢NZ ° ~ ~F paQwwYWWwaam R r«aJ^rz rci daRw R.°.o3{`~rv «owozP« Rz lei>jNpo.WN ~~"..iN<ri+waN o~NC.Q. w.2.~iNar-io~~z ocirc~o mOywOJUZZPh Ou0 O< OJ«<oWOWr«OZm ~Zw w0 )N mUrJ VO mOU O wLZhVOUWUS6J2V ~<mVyV00 6V,NWwNr JY{j ]m Ul-V Y« «PNS Yuf«2~~ww 00 33 HOOVO«~-rYZwlp< wr r~' Upm rcOURrc «O SVF _ ZZYZ>LLWwWU« js ZNZOVJ J 22 2?V?«wwJZ m LL«SJY24Y V V'1'«m91~OJy yYF6JVZ6• J= OwJV000 J'uw«YJw2 mLUUUK2 mu2NNpLLN<wm wOyO«<OO<w>JS<ZwNPOwwwO<WW w{<~w«J ~ LLmtt¢~RwOmrLYVUKO<lJW>mrUZSC3Q6NmNwWNU[L6~p V z U O 2 U Z > 2UVZJ N} L20 y 3 V <V~- E«~OZ U2< U2Uti W% •V« Owi Z«1« t m22 OOQN rU $ UwWNI 000 6VVwY nn VZ ~NUU L N t pZmwS < O~J p ~FYLO ? QSJ R~Y< ~NJ N~ O< V6NUP«U 3 UWw ZZ O Vpp6wNrLLry JwyQO u~rO JG YwN NI-OZV ~r<J<•J< L Ziu P,r LZ2NmQN0« w J wti SLYV L2mQ O ~rpu rlZ <N YGSVOOLW03PKUImjLUJ1- «WU < Y UN9U6Y~0066VwwZ2WOSU 1-••U L`220 Jp«iz `a w<op u JoppJw<z<NLLwd<W ~ N¢W6 <W«UZZW<ONwi ZZWrJ Z L<L { uASJ OjW2 ZJ 2ryJwY J6COJ1 J< O L 2I><{<_w_ J I w2 Z N .~Y 1« S~ 'U «LSJw ~ YWjF G'mx « 2ZjYO W~~NwJL= QZHmOOJJW«:jtppthp^N6UYQY Zu u m w VVm-~2p rv2FZN «r2iVOYmYJJJ~JJ IYY J'1 ) ~ LLSL YI <1 mPmhymrrONrNry+rymPmPrhm~p+OmT+aOrmNmmina LL1 mNOmOPOrNaarrrrrrvr-P+«Cm •.rrr0•.N ryhryNaNryryrry Y ra.-+hmmarrNhJhhrOryrmhmNrnhFryhhP hh NTh 1 r .rrrr r ..rr '1«r.l .n r .yrrrr ..Ir ..l nr rr r 9 Pl~Pr««PW Y r ••N Y••Y ~(fNgfN N PNOyNr6m WWpWWWO••Y OCPWy«dWmPONNNgmN•IP WPwWyWfrNNgm 19 Y qy NgPgPq»O•"••P NPO«NOmJdyydlmgyN«gONdNgvd 1) 1( W MmNNNi<NNLNNNNADAAAa9pF39'Y 199OmOZ220p «•yi2~ 1 0 or«> no >s««ss ammsms»sxz:m > im zm««r-1 °y iz ~izzmNZ2mcmzrratincnT SImPCNNIRN ~orNnz.^rm 2z RmmmA ZoA °mz.~i«mori(zs~xN»yx..N•:.m9i s~N o c9mNmmmmNno zNO zoz« rD i z %zN>cm> «> Tsy( oT( n9~mrs»~In .>.s ie•s oNl°-immNi°~~zzz °mmmsyil"NmtiNi9~ n9~n~(2 °s nmis o mos m z«oonnnn Nmpr naa rAZ (s x<«sACm rzNSis-~«Npo°pm'>° i « « Too •'4m A ~a 1 T y«tiZn>IC% N900ZZmp NOZ «•n « 1 Z oN pxz sp D9mcn a«<n~ z c nz pi ~ 1 s A r9 mz mmAmmTno«m• nn m 1 a i ) N nMC9i y<A ON D < m o nN aozna»sTTS 9 a •m+t z i s n a '~ +ylvy. >ii m«n z v n• 1 y i Na-• 1 N -i n z > Nn •~+sco» i i O 2 AS C n _ I D T T> n N. O 9 • > ( I•• n N nm m. i i ( .)• i n z iN i n c <N n< A (~ y n D mmoiOTmpp1'12T•m•9rZmITm1mTTTI~o1Di~.m. rtiv cmm~irmmmsi i T «n~99sr~~s~m~•'"•°-m~«I>°n~iz'R yazr•s.loti~y"Tg rf Niy ~» irE r%iii~m a«oris s » mT ooNm>oo«NIAOZ » n(n meoommmgzarNTOm ~~eaa nn~(/Tlnnn.N.NI'In i`I DmmpTAr> ~nnnDS~.y w"~•N.•N °A $i n nmm i ~ NNm cs»z°o9°oo9ir. 1°.•i ~iN NN ~1'I~im ~m~ieDm m~«pO E~INN»A>TAHD-12m y1 m N NmrtiST i« r )NNN 92f nrAN OANSS In _Ny y NimZ02 «m F Yti1rTNryp AO GC IA a N Y -q `N NY •~ STD a•a N•• i >aZZ ; PS( T~ OS 9mN ( ^PP Ao~O OPtiy NAA«ti l. I 1~9 9 ! 1 m>1•1 EOG DP4 A a(ONN 1 r01 NOTE«T m•InM O-~ 1~>.y_ON Wf•~• (YEN y•• ; A )O mIN+A <~•mi OC O v 1 W01 ~% rw 1 R~e ~ Znr9nnnnn «mnmm~~ n > n nannam~P • 2 lA 2 n >A• q s ApO~poOpO oppR{ o m o pypp9m i 8 N _ _ ___ V _ti 1 _y qN '_~ )»1-1L az 1 gSir y q I m O» S N >qa TTTT y N AT T9[Tma%ON 1 >p2 AAA A',n nDaYd A A aAw m• 1 D PA rM~n O_ f q (~ % mT TmTTT mT~ ynYTN j y' 9N NNNNy~ NHIn N •Si~P N(Tn O n C N NNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN Ir n WWWWWWWWWWWWwwWWWwWWWWWWWWW > 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000 IT I ypUPi.wNrOdPNPUJwNrOdmtiPglwN»OdP~PNlWN~pdNN li O m ^• i n s it 9 s is n lqq :.o m y oi~a mgoaN O.'-.w-vNOS-~i`NN-•rl„~.•o~.`•vcyi •'~-o~ay~o~as l i °°oooo.n o=•~~+o =.o~PeoNico~*~*+o.•w..-1o ~~n oN~*ooMa~c 1• ooovppooo~m mo••m WOOOgP:N«dWOOmoNOOOOo /O morn+°o°q°omm.mom w°OP m°q °q ~~~°n nmrvoro~o o°o°oc o m ..NrOrvmaNrPm~~~lJNmOmm~FMLmnwmOmNFPm LL Q i .-. .-~ n y N m „ n SI ti 2 p OnNmJNJn my.q„rymlNpnOPOnNmYNpnmPO„ pynnnnnhl-n hn000m00mmmmPPPPPPPPPP00 i K OOOO m00000000m000000040m m1q•~mm~~~mmm 3~ NrvryNNryrvNNNrvNrvNrvrvrvN~v NNNnNNrvry^.rvNNNNN V 1 O r U p V V r w N Vm w Z OP U Z 'r ti '.„ .n r „ .~ n .-~ K ¢_¢ww¢< > 2 KN LLinm¢ rv mTY~ i U 00000 m ~m0 .JVUCOFO%= O`1'N O •M SF WWWWW02¢ 2mm yU 4 > NN i yw N N 3< w3w~ wwltiK :~ a~<J zi Neu i~i~«3 oo w~»° mum p+ o_ml° - - :-viov~u"o oWt n'n ~FVNw .:m co iiN¢~uiii -o ¢.. z oa iamNaN.+¢ io J"' ¢. ~z.-a„ u< WWWIOw LLxn o >w z ~iW z3NNOU¢w¢.- zq ~1 zJNZWiw„LL ..zN_ _¢NwuNN wz 6mJ ~> > <Y W~ -w ~i0¢ZNNr <ZOh r~a>o°q ~°¢a~rchw:uw6owNauu~Nwgh¢ uYZ~z. ¢ <~ZwOwi NShi ¢ SU2Uw •+ ZVZM¢OJO OOi¢O { O<Ur ~N0 <SZN h Zw=wS m322 46aJt26<t wp0 •V ZVZJ2n y EOULLr~O„w ^'LLn0¢L6 N¢n.~Orr <J<Ni.r1w W UZ >~-ZtZUw m.pmm l.y. OJ<J6w<¢WwwwU„„<DOw ypO u Pi[. .+JN¢¢im>w¢Un¢a¢¢<SVSVVK~OSL V < Z ~ c~oeocip .. VUVUYU „ L < x22222202 V Z000000V0 O 00<O V< <6 Kp wwwww GV O„ wV2 00 VY W0 1 u ¢m « « « <z~ zq u a ~i 1 2.22xzzz_¢a So -N ~„„ N wuo a Woaoooooowo JW „~ N~ w o ~•. < ."...„„:, .LL..w. „.'.JZ y4 z¢ Jo ma i ~ wosi 3 N`J JJJJJJLL< /O YN ¢t 21_n Oj3 ¢ VUUUVUUVZO ¢wN¢NJNVYZJ SSW NGS •W6 o aiu<nrcow<w J .J N ¢ zsz z xrow NFWLnWrz » ¢YWJNO LLo mW¢¢¢~¢a~¢<¢r z1 orLL a__ z<___-SWWu WWW <„Yn hF J¢ t V 1 FF2Z~IZZZ~OJnnWm ¢NWM1 ~~+ WO O 6X 1-n1. 1-W2¢Jmr,l O<2 ><w ¢rtN ~[60 '~ JJ»JJ»W«JR>NLVWrLWJNL~%<6J¢46~ 1 ~NNNNNNNNNNNNn<„„„S Nx~>~"~.+<OSNar~W ZOW <1 nim„f nm0mmm0m0PON„nVNm„M1gNNfP i o 1 oFlm mn...-.....m Nmnmam ....f mfffcf a..m ..o rf-.o f ~ „ mmmma~mNmmoy~my~y~~mymNCO~NyNN - CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAil10NGA STAFF REPORT GATE: April 12, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Oiractor BY: Elizabeth Stoddard, Assistant Finance Oirec for SUBJECT: 1987-BB BUDGETARY ADJUSTMENTS ~p LCCA.NO ~K` I ~9 C a i }~ A [-i C IZ :i U~'a 19]7 Approve all 1987-88 budgetary adjustments for the General Capital Projects and Special Reserve Funds. BACKGRDUND: W.he.^. the budget dev elepment process begins, sra ff is ac rually projecting estimated revenues and appropriations 14 to 16 months ahead of antic lpa ted needs. In general, estimated revenues have been adjusted upward to reflect increased activity in all funds and to delineate con trl6u tions from other funding sources. Appropriations have been adjusted to properly reflect unantic tpa ted ~ne nditu res throughout the year and to reflect Council direction, spec tfully submitted, G, , Jim Hart Administrative Services Oirec for J M:E]:CV /V m o00o a °O oo~°n ° 0 00 ob c ~' oo~a~ N a ti.-m .. °r n.. °oN ~ dY e d o 00 0 L' N b0 O O O O G A ~n0 O a'O n0 O O % ~ m N a m m ., .c o ° o ."-. °o f. .. E TOE .-ON O d d C cq0 CWC OWp En EnO V do. Tim TNT. ~T~nN ~+ E _ mam ~o ~o_Aw [«c _ adN uEE6£WFYO VN~YSOC WO~ 9dW C Ontl•~n0 y wtlW G£ G b tl Y C Y O w£ Y£ E w c P££% V V d oW U x ~ a V1 W u 0 A t E d 6 ~ 0 Y V V~ C C 6' y X Y W d p> C~ O T L Y L W W Y Y N d Y Y N V W L Y v~ L dM N~Lr CUU. V-r qC qC >•~+-qcr-N+V- •Y•~V06 Z W OI~C+~wtpJSUHF V Z'LFUU£ V'E>c0] ~Uwf--~ C .~+ 00 O O O~ O a 0 D) O O a O O O a< O a O ti M O a N O O G O O O m N a O N O O C O O O a O a O f1 a N a N O 4 O~~r+N O'P P.+^OPOm~000~~Y NmP O~Hm1~GWO)PNPP000 ti~+nl~l~l~nnn.-~M R+aammmm.mmmmaaaaaaaaaaaam~r L m bbb Y>bb biC b~O ~ObbbblO b O~W yy~ v C C a C O! a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a O a a M LfG O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I W yN L ry w 4 f yN COJ O N N P P O N O Pm L .r Om ft N ti N N W -~ b N ~ E C C w LL E W y` C _ _ ~ H i c ~E u c ti. ~ c G v d~ co c ui~ A a ~ .'+ ,',~~ dC"" E G v~ ~d .w uW iD 6Nttf NOOLL ~wN C FL O O~G Ui 00 0000000 O~ P M O O+N NNYIbNm I+i N1100 'n ~~ V V n m W tiT !3 N W v~ mV N ObQ+O u N I rOO O O ~O Omi O s ~ R S 9 „ ~^ D j „~ ~ N mi m ~ mN yy ~ y~j y M; C N M ~ H R „ n „ `~ N N „~ y = m „ 5 o m o ~ ~ x m o e ~ A s ~ N / yr O ~a ~ I~ ° , s < N R n C C R ff N „ ~ ~pQ W m O Y O O O m A (~ NNNNN NNNNNNNN ~~ P P A A O A P ° ° ° ur-~ ~~ ° W m~ m m m mmmmammm mam a b W W W W W W W W v W .e b y mNOmmv "'O b m V v V •YWmWCOm mmm mmmm mm apm V V V V H r r r m 'S S. O ~'-' O m O O O O O p WNWV1 AN OWm VmV~ N O NOf A O O O 2 S ~ m u Y~ b b b W +Z. + W T C y ~; N ~ l O~ y'y1 ~< N R N R N ID N „ ~ ~ (t „ /mJ ~< m N m ~ a~ a~ a~ - ~ m W m~ y m g o y yi 'w ~ r ~ m ~mi i m'm aa~m ~N~ M1~ ~ ''Q' ; y VIWr. 11 W= y Y y ~ q N c~~ J Ru U„N q It + N l R (f ~ clm„crt N J~ n 9„~„'el-a ~A SAM m u~ „ m n „ ,m.~n6 Y ~m gi zNS < my F" S e°c ~m oorv~ $ .Wxm .y o ~ „ „ l1 „ C O VI M ~ „ i y Y „ m ~ ~ W a N N d nn~~~~ 8 ~ > .O2A y D~ 9 4 S a~ 0 V V ?R n'~~<N bpy 9 N 9 ~ 3 T j m ~~ ~ 4 J ~ l „ l m, ~ m ` 4 ~b 1 l '1Im e 9 O n , 7 NiO= N_ M1 „_ C 3 ~ ~ „ N m N J V A b m y N V NpIV N N q W W: p1p O V1 O~ m~b 1p 1 b N m A ~ Y N 0 ~ U V ^ rW O ~ ~ p O ~ ^ yy O N m N 0 N O O w1 b0 b 1 00 j.~ IJ NO b p Q O O O F T N O 0 ~ ~ ppp H W N W O O V1 m Q V O U1 ~ W a 8 O m O O ~ ~ I O O O ~~ o 00 m~ a b .. 00 u C W O O N OOS N b N oYlm m ~ W10N m . r ~+1 C .+NH NO RR .~enP N N N co ° m o a o o e m u" ° u ~ m o Y a - d Y c ~ ~ ~ .~. ~ r ~ c o.. e e ~ a P u n e ~I-~ e 6_ Q . V I r 6 _ G _ Y L 6 7 D O ~ _ ii -- w N S S j y ~ a ~ E t i~ W X a '-e Yo m°r-o `c-o t~Y'~'o + O ~xo K L O Y O d ^~ Mu N L b Y Vy G9'N O Px Myy Wr~ LL N Yy W G ' O L Yy Wh L t-yiL Ly w V .nw W ux W L( w ° y Zi w ¢~. ~ L 'rww ~a w W ~L n ~ c Lwr oq~. 4 N K m y WL M 3 tu LM CM C y KFL NNFS F'iC y~j'6 ~ oW i'-~ a i~~ f~0 bl~ d~0 O O m O [O O. mm mW m 0~ H m r n n M1 n n m P b e V bb 1O 0~ O W~ K s u ° v o~ ~ ~ ~S o ~~ ~ ° ° e ~ u y a c w y c ' ~ y rn ~ y o q o me > ~ ` u a . a' u` ~ ~ " ~I LL ~ ~g F oe q s c vl T W '~-. ~ h l LL o ` e sc .. N e ~ y C ~ o L m e m ~ c co .+ O q o ~ ~ ~ c uW uw u ~ { Wp o 'u'Y~ ~i N ' w S L .- ` n po r , l `W W N LW L F_« W L W y y j y C y ~ W ¢ m N ~ { ~L v2 ~ UI-i V ~O:i L i s m o m s o mo ~N ^7 o L o ~I by ~u s e ° n n w vn 1 /~ v~~W 0 a~ ~ W s ., m; ~R »o a~ ~_ T~ ~ '.tea A N M N N ~o N o N N O 1~ y{ 1 1 1 yy 1 ~ ~ y ` ~~ ` ~ ~ ~~ ~ p y Q ~o O O ~ yY f11 v v Inl m m ~~~ry1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:: ~~ I I I A Y Y a P A A P P P P A Y Y A i A ~ A ~GP OIT 0/0101010/ O1010101TPGIPPPm p01 b P A P A A A A A P P A A A P A A P A P v r v V V J V 4 V V V V V J V V V V V V V V I mnammmmmlm lWmalW maoamm min mm O V V V V V V V v V V V V J V V V ~:m ~` a 00 ObiUAWNNO~Om WV OW1N Nr1p 0)PW VIV ~i~bW WN~Ip ~O 101000 ~7 Nd ndW N~ N 7s Jy 00.~~~ SSSS^ T ~~ rM1 75~.~~ N R N N N~ N N~ N C S D yy N ~ 1 M1 N ~ N r11i T 1 O.CNN~G.~~CL~fIG 60j `nQn ~N1nn~~3i=ra as°o°Snio-n ma+~ O N ~ _ O ~ 1C T b pfv~V101OPPN10 bf3 pP NSONYB~O~WAYPO 00 O AOOOOO(PONWOSO oO~p W V Np (O V1 N WWII p // O OYS S OOJ I~ la ~~ i~ N`W W 0 t pz 6p 6 u 0 6y S WSI O W t~) i h N N N 0 0 0 O C N N N m W O P ti mN NP n 000~N~P101(+ bP b0~01M0.+~ o~.,earin ou, °a~ < N..c mN ~ rf O QOn17 < Or1 ~'1 QOM N O~O~V b OD)0 O n1•~'INQm .-~ Oa~0~m0 O P 0 Q P m ti N N~ O N ~~ m N N m O N O O u l ^ 9 Cp a. O m P v) N w 4 Q a~ E p Y b6 R~+iL ~ m uyF d_Pd NF-rL^O u~4~eG 9 cc O16 -«6uu«YW S 6E0'K V~ cOtJ Y u~+- 6n yCC N a D~W NN .6R Cw TdcCNCCLU~WE^OOCN9^ Lu TL-'V u06•~-d G2a d332pdKp{J LOO>~"~6 f6f6 W~ u ry d~d99_W c 2 M 99« ~'OCOUCPI 16 d~4'L d6~r•rrC Cgpi.EiN rEi NjN T6'L.a WBa r Nr.Sk ~ip~~c ~~ TG Ei T'aiF~ua~~N ~ E •dn Y H N N N V L C^^ m~ P P ~ d O c u f 0 vai OrnL N tLi u mE~agm=mmmm~am=~.......,=€~~ad~»~~ma~ oo°~wm«°n nnmrv~imeae°ea«eeh N~`.~i nr u~i ~.°. °m fo'm mo o° b b n n n n n n n n n n n n r r n r r r n r r h r r r n N W O m00mmmmmmWW~~Mmmmmd; ~~0 lm mQJd~~0MMM001 r: mnnm~nn~:nn~nnrri~rin minnn~minnnnmm~mma Qp~b~CiV bbbbbbb~0 b10 ~O tO 10bbbbbbN bl0bbV101010P O d O O d O O O O O O O C O d<< O d C O V O rt V< V V C d d V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N w O W O "a •v b b IO vt O .~ ~Ny u1 N Yl Oi N O 04 K E C ~w i' O sWW O h N w g d O O Oa«V «CW dC 4~n a~~ a c«~`+«` «aTOa rJNtJU fteAd6 i~ pW Om OOIW ~OIW O O lO 'gym ~ 'fiF ~tn ~~' S ~~o ~' m" m " m~i ti mi3 'yp yN MO p '~IIA~ ~ MPO P i 'l n ~ m r~ r ~ wm`m m .~~~ ~.+ ° ~ 3 ~~ fe v. N N Y ~ ~S ~ n Am m N ~ T O G Ay ~ N F NS (l N ~ N p W~ 01 i"' S N m I G W NIN • O w V V ~ 00 O~r~~O+1 ry O O W N W W N ~ N n N N N N N N A A P P> P WWWW P 01~W X01 O~P.Q W010~ b W W W W V V V ~ W W W W W W b U W m m m M blG W W W W WCO J ~` J V G O O V 4 V V V V V 00~0•H W vP.O Ob1W O~O~W NO1 •~OtlNWp •~ y f WO =OV~APV~SWNrp » W ~ N l Iq » < `O N lW Sb I) » ? A ~ 82i 6 R ~ ; r T~n <_iVl ~Mr~~ ~~°n3C x~n~~i~~~~ 'R« "a i5~ R`am 7f m'~c~od ~..~~ ~° g~ a BADS "~~o i ~w~ ~"r'n ~ i~mc ~m^ n~ o ~b'm au a 2 `° a ~ ~ x 7 N N N ~Np tVn •• 00 OHO OLObNWOp 80 OO~W NOOVIbO G O b O O O W O N N W u YI OIY Y ~O 0 ~ O ~p 0 p~popo{y (~ Y1 OJ N W OOCI IS o ~ a~ N m H 'm m y Om v mm sT mS m N y y~ W i W O R .. u t o c O WI 6i N C y6 t Wy N i W ~+ N oo~ 0 o Q 0 o SS o~8 ° ~+~ . . wN ~ N~ V ~ N N O y W J Y O ry • ~tl E J • tl N 6 4 • NItl G Z y~ L `SW G ~3 J` C'F >~Y ~r3 p C 6 O y 6 l ~ N C J> C O W d F O 4 60 N W M N 6 Y W K Y Y f O . ~ yV W F 4W ~ C ~ P ` ~ ~ : = q ~W + - W + ~/ ~~~ o e 0 5s~~ ~~ °c~ mP mo ass o M s~~ m e e NH~~ ~ ~~ <~ N K C V J 3 O W ~ ~ c 4 d d ~ 4 O O C O " O ~ J d i - r d s i ~I d '.P ~ ~ u i u :- s ~ a qa t ~a v $a a ~a o ~ i o K ~ E o ~ t m~ a J i o W W Y ~ Y W Y W Y ~L Y y V Y ~W ~~ y~ b 1 W rW a~ ~..I W ~ 4W 5~ W Psl LWU = N s LWY = ~ C i s s T s s P P P m.+ 1~ m mo mo IU r+0 0 NO 0 moo u1 V1 10 OHO OP IMP 1+O ndl fD0 ! 4 i m u m am am PN ..m O~ O N O m O~ ~ O N E ~ 0 0~ O W O b O O b O O p p q 1~ Nm~ ~ m~ ~ miO N mi ~ iD °o ~ fi N A Il O,G ~ ry'~ ~ N ~ Q ~N N Y~i»~ qN nm ys pnnm ~ !'~lrv ~ "a x~ i4 ~' m 'yam Fd 9A a ~J > x ~ ~ i :n'pO 7 i j~ n a~ y Au m mom' T~~ m D~ ~ Sly ~ mix ~ ~ $ ~~ K u ~~ ~ N N i RRR N N u~ `m g i' ~' I'm N g N a ~ .K' ~m I~ m m PP ° u p N ~~ ~A ~O N A P ~ H ~~pp pq O~O S 40i G O m S ~W W e ~p~pI1I1 m IQi m ~ I~ h m mom mma mmm Ntl~P UUY qNa W W V OW W V w V q P W W noo wua o~e.- A A N O O N O O P W m O O Y M p O ~rsds Ada«s ,rs~;s mnni~ m~'n f°n~ miwm 9°. //ee~~ ~ ~ Il ~ ~ ~~~pp R f1 rv R~ pp HQ 1~wy 11spe11~1 NNI'I~y ~ i~ '< ~ y w ~ a 2 w n n a°M~ a~9~p a~~~ m G u~ ~ N l ~n ~` ~ ~ ~ ~ J~ _ .^ ~ i'J ~ i ~. ~ C 6 N ~ N o i° N O O N > V ~ yNJOO 8OW N S N O O O pV~ O O V m 0 m +~; s m;~ y~yr N S. ~ c yN ~ m N w (~ a Nppf ~O r mooaY m W W W O VPW~+ bOt00 O W O ~ fi>,~„s y~~'~;3Ng It N N n N N !w o n m " m ~yy ~a a8~ C fi ~ y Z :•IY ~_ ~ N $ p ' in N ~. y i N m N ~ Yp1NNV1 p O S O Im Iti I~ /~`~ N b O P G W ~ n00O IN ~ u e r o ,~ t a p 6' 1/W~ i~ N O+ m O b y6 6 ~p bfn ~ ~ 6 b ^ y i O W P O'! n b O Ec O { = n Y y i ~ C ~J ' ° ° N LL ~e o ~~~ve o N:de V ~ ~ N C W .X i ~ ~~ Y p +S~Y ~ " +- d~ 6 . ~0 ~¢ S N 'S 55 ~ K > a O > ~~~ 9 G y 6~~ O K ~ O 2 a L o. 6 a O W 6 y O C wy N yYYy Y OL U CNi.1 ^ Myyy Y W p 6' y y CUV- y C W j ` ~ p W E W g N Y W ~ N U W il l V Y C ~ ~j N ~ O F 1 p i 1 o pb UU ~ y N 6 e y j' Q y V Vi Y 7C i ( L 6'E { i OJMC O HOO m O OTd~ OOOi Oi •n n 1~ M M n n n < C O O O C d C K V' < P P O 0 0 0 P 0 W 0 m S N O. m U m W W y ~ 4 ~' i K y O o PP ° l Q m ~ ~ ° p ~~Iyyy ~ v~ o E o rolm ii ! ~1 ~ m 1 N i m N W ~ ~ M ~ W ~+ C d C C j d d 4 ~ d °~ ~ w ~ V .. i p o u i., o e ~ tWl ` c rn l NC W ~ 11y~~ y NC =LL ~ ~ C I NI J c L I Oi it > G' I f LL ¢ C ~ 1 >K yip w N rt i O > E O m x F O N i O Y i O f J H W ~ W W N ~ y O Ip w Y a W Y ~ W Y y TYM ~ ~~ ~ YY11~ Y~ ~ N Y yl L i W yl L W H 1 N . L `IF d W rV 1 N a LW ~ y d LW OJY ~ W 1 0 6 ~ C y p yy ~ Q yy O C . . ~ 6 i 6 ~i ` ~Z 4 ~ O pp a P P noo ino O~ nao na no wo m°a ma wo a° to to m e tic y ~~ ~ P O O O W ~ O W O O ~ y i ~ O ~ Nn O ~ erne frf Y P m Y 2 m T M N y H N ^ q n ~y t ff tad a m f1 ffnM1 a ~ , i ~ ~ % N C V ~ C b ~ ~n 1G (l a ~n O 6 ~ 2 y R y N A N N N (~ 4 N O( WNr ~ mr q A W P .+ m O p Ta T i fl m a a m Y P V p ~O O i+ O O Y ~' a mS T.~ N T q N ~ Nyy lN1 D N s1~1 a y~~ 4» a~~s g~~•- • p m O f 2~ ~' ~~ CO ~ ^ 0. r1 Mwi..iMw• A _,,.. 0.IM MMM ..... tW tlw-Ir MrAMww~~~ Wew OW AMIKAIIQM tQt tat[O1gIK ttN~IWt t1Ci1tyfl I. tVK(31 d lIClNS[{S) NLE NQ. )a Qltvsw! N Alnltlk twp'Iti GwMN \ tw LL ~~~' aN tart 9ottlAt !lC5w Np, '~"~ s r cNl.vste 11r ttlltltlr . ~..~......,~,...~..~ . cArru vcArrr µ Coot 36ts - Aw ltt~ ~ W ]. llAMtl3) G AINSKAHTIA TMp !pr 'u r A. i SMrAA ~ Apt1A pAw 3s ]1011 ^ ltwNw Qtly .Aavar~ Ftielw Doll: 3. TrrtQ1 a ttANSACrgNQ1 f@ Ix. TYIt ae.b[. t tv.,. oo 1) a Ny~~fy ~.. s. lalefm d t~w~s-Nr.bp pd Lwt 3)1A -\9CA 9c. Ctl'aM DV Ce/o \ CaoN! lt>CAl 1]3t.0t •W ~~ wN~ r~ r~ w ti IwMr wliwr. aw ~ ~. ~~. 4. rl~r~n r in ~rwl: n '~. ~. •w-n•• r`Y r/IwMr r. Ywr ~pYM Antl ~ Y ~N ti M M Y ww~~ ~Iwh ~M~ w~ mw ill ~w r r~ ~Yr ww Y ~~Ywr ~r.. r M NJr•r .. w iY r//~ ~ ~~.~+~ u~ V ~~~r• J ws wrwi ~.. M wNM~ F ~/Y~Yp ~~ •rAw 4 "Y rY w HM1 w rr~w.~ " L . ~. HY r .raw ~w n ~~ M nrM1 ip Ln wn~Mw M Y~ r yl~e ~~V wFw4 w W ~.w Cwn+~ w w r+ ~ ~wYii ~ wwrr w w 1w ~r Mr M nwlww w w r...~. a ~~ IA r r .w rur r. v .ww.. n .r w. rrr . x. i~ w. ,. ~..+~+. ~.+«.. 11. AMIICAM + _~ SIGN HM! ______._._._.__~____--~-__-_.~. ___..________~_..___._..~.___.._.-___-____-___.. P ___ _ ___ ______ ______ _ __ _ __ _ _... _ _ I3. 3)ATf q CADlO!!NA Cowry N__su y-_.wi_.. -_______-__-__pAli ~/]A/W e.r r.wn + ..n~..r ..~ w. +r..• ..r~ ..i., r .r., ~~ . r i...ww . r ...w+•..ow. A w .m.+ a ~1 ~ w. Iwrwn ..r. plo~~ «r rrn.r w r'+., wry r.r- ~ m iww, io w r.w..n.. rrw w ww wwM bnwlJ Av+N 4r rl w wM~ wr Y rM'.' rl 4rxr MrY r M W rM~ ~ M iJ r.1~ n ~~ N Y pwr~ I)1 w+ ~~I~ ar14~Xr r wrwM wIw w M ~~ w W~ rww~ Y ~ M w n IwW Yrw~ www~ :+~ ~ ww Mrs Yn w~1 Y M r w nvMw Wrlr M IM A Y 0.wi4~ r w W w MMIM wAn~ w r Ir F stir I MME r w YFJ n ~~ rr' wow / wti~+~ Iq ww Y ~Iw rLti ~ Y ~.1w~n ~r w~lr rw~rn w M Wr~r .w r wNww pWr 4 Y a~~i. AnaAoL ~tMwIN note, Q __-.-__.____________________--_._-_-._-..__.-__.-_CDl10 MAM1N._____.___~_._.__..____.__._.___.._.__. ~w~r~ ^ t111wrNi Iw N____._..._-lN1 N_. ~~__________________ ptlw M....___.._..___.-11L1LM 110..__-_.__--_..___~_.. • • r. 11. lsplNn a'^/6" aprr p ilii~ 9 p 10 M M eIIQA1MA dMA ArM M Agri piA N tlln atptpXM. 1i. ApplkrvA apw fa) Mu anI rwiatw wylend 0. am~No MmW ppiua wAl iaw N tM y1rilMCMels N e icmw, aM rol Apl L. Nt mr walep > a.u. w twNl p b .tA.1.1 wn d Ap ae.~AMt d M Alwislls twww CawN AN. t5. 3\ATip GWOR1M Capryd.~llt!iryti9ll4___-_______Dw__1/~ ___________ DANN NNY 1111e TM1 t.iv) !M DgwUIMI [tw Otly a m. ni r,: ~! r v! PEPPER'S Loaated:8740 18th St. Rancho Cucnrtbnpa, CA Property Is currently Zaned NEIGHBOR COMMERpAL Zonlnp of edJeoent property la: North Medhxn-Hlph Reeldentle~ 14-24 DIPS/!uC South Medlum Resldentld 4-14 DU'3/AO Eeat; Medlum-Hlph Resident1ei14 [4 DU`SiAG West: OFfloe APN 202-t11-G8 ey: S, Remlrez 4-9-88 _~ aY 19 rrd 5 r. STAFF REPORT Date: April 20, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Ry• 6ldeon Y. Agra, Jr. Civil Engineer Subtect: Award and Execution of Professional Services Agreement with Linville Civil Engineers/Land Surveyors, Inc. to prepare plans, specifications and estimate for Hillside Road Pavement Rehabilitation Protect between Hermosa Avenue and Mayberry Avenue, for a fee not to exceed 512,690.00, to be funded by Systems Development Account No. 22-4637-8756 It is recomaended to award and execute a Professional Services Agreement with Linville Civil Engineers/Land Surveyors to prepare plans, specifications and estimate for Hillside Road Pavement Rehabilitation Protect. Such work to be done for a fee not to exceed E12,690.00 plus lOR contingency shall be paid from Systems Development Fund. BACK6it0UMD/ANALYSIS• On March 24, 1988 four fines responding to a Request for Proposals for - -i ~- _.~ n-_a-_• ,.,..~a ~~~• M~_IInA nP vn.Y harYnrnnnA ~... ~, r reference and design team credentials to the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga. Four of the firms met the professional and scope of service requirements established by staff. A ranking of the fee proposals are as follows: Linville Ctv11 Engineers 512,690.00 Don Greek and Associates 516,000.00 GPS 518,500.00 Associated Engineers 524,000.00 Staff recommends Linville Civ11 Engineers/Land Surveyors, Inc. for award of the protect. The not to exceed fee will be paid from the Systems Development Fund and is included in the Capital Improvement Program list for 1986-87 with budget allocation therefor. Resoe . 11y ubmitted, f,~"~„_r RH Attachment ~S RESOLUTION N0. p A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDN6A TO ANARD AND EkECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ABREEMENI NITN LINYILLE CIVIL EN6INEERS/LAND SURVEYORS, INC. OF RANCHO CUCANONOA, CALIFORNIA TO PREPARE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATE Fpt HILLSIDE ROAD PAYEMENI REHABILITATION PROJECT BETNEEN HERlpSA AVENUE AND MIIYBERRY AVENUE YMEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga desires to improve Hillside Road as a collector size east-west thoroughfare between Hermosa Avenue and Mayberry Avenue, and as a consequence sent out Request for Proposals to several engineering companies to design such protect for construction; NHEREAS, the firm of Linville Civil Engineers/Land Surveyors, Ync. has represented as qualified t0 perform the services in the Request for Proposal and was chosen by the City Engineering Staff to provide professional engineering services for field surveys, engineering design, studies and calculations for the preparation of plans, specifications and estimate for Hillside Road Pavement Rehabilitation Protect. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, 4hat the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve to award and execute a Professional Services Agreement aith Linville Civ11 Engineers/Land Surveyors, Inc. to provide professional engineering services to prepare plans, specifications and estimate for Hillside Road Pavement RehaD111tat1on Protect between Hermosa and Mayberry Avenues. Such work shall be performed for a fee contingency fund in an amount of lOf of the contract amount shall also be established for use under the approval and direction of the City Engineer for extra work or Change Order during the course of plan preparation. ~~ --- CiTY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: Aprf1 20, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 8y: .1Qhn L. Martin, Associa*_e Civi? Engineer Subiect: Approval and Execution of a Professional Services Agreement ~~ with L.A. Nainscott and Associates, to prepare Street Nidening and Signal Plans for Arrow Route from Grove Avenue to Baker Street for a fee not to exceed fb0,447.00 to be ' funded from the Systems Fund, Account No. 22-4fi37-8736. ~ REDDMlEMDATION• It is recoewended to award and execute a Professional Services Agreement with L.A. Nainscott and Associates to prepare plans, specifications and estimate for Street Nidening and Signal Plans for Arrow Route from Grove Avenue to Baker Street to be funded Dy Systems Developaw:nt Funds, Account No. 22-4637-8736. BACKGRDUMDlAMALrfStS• Proposals were received from Norris-Repke; Don Greek and Associates; GPS; ... .. N, vyv „ was removedy from consideration Vdue~to award of two other projects for design. The proposal from Norris-Repke did not address the workings to be performed in the Grove-Arrow Route intersection. GPS and Don Greek and Associates proposals acknowledged the street and signal workings in the Grove-Arrow Route intersection to be done by the Traffic Consultant and io be included in the final "package' to the City. The proposal from L.A. Nainscott Included a Landscape Consultant to prepare comments and sketches on various private properties that require widening and relocation of private landscape improvements. [t also included Civil Engineering design of the Grove-Arrow Route intersection design of-atetraffic slgnal~by a sub-consultant (Traffic Engineer) to City Standards. IC also include a Hydrology Study to confirm street capacity of the street where existing curbs will be retained (since some are less than 6 inches in height). it also included Aerial Mapping of the entire protect. This proposal seemed the most detailed and presented a more complete package to the City. ~- CCSR Re: Arrow Route April 20, 1988 Page 2 Comaents fray the City Traffic Division were solicited regarding the concept of a consultant Traffic Engineer performing street improvement plans for the Grove-Arrow Route intersection. Ne received a negative resoonse. The fee proposals are as follows: Don Greek and Associates 556,650.00 GPS 46,200.00 Norris-Repke 41,700.00 L.A. Nainscott 60,947.00 Further review was lade to determine a task Dyy task/fee by fee analysis of each proposal prior to making a recaanendation after having determined that the best proposal was fram L.A. Natnscott. The best overall package that confonas t0 the desires of all divisions was fra L.A. Nainscott. The overall fee anaiysis Tndiwtes that their proposal would be similar Lo the No. 2 bid. The low bid was declared inadequate as not addressing the intersection. The No. 2 and 3 bids did not conform to the desires of the Traffic Division. Therefore, the recommendatlen is to award the design contract to L.A. Natnscott. o nenuH fnl l~?vMi NSA ~,¢~ ~. RHM:JL :pam Attachment ~~ RESOLUTION N0. ~ ~ ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO ANARD pN0 EXECUTE A PROfE55I0NAl SERVICES AGREEMENT KITH L.A. NAINSCO'T AND ASSOCIATES OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA TO PREPARE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AMD ESTIMATE FOR ARRON ROUTE NIDENING PROJECT BETiIEEN GROVE AYENUE ANO BAKER AVENUE VAiEAEAS, the City of Rancho Cucaieonga desires to ieprove Arrow Route as a rwaJor size east-west thoroughfare between Grove Avenue and Baker Avenue, and as a consequence sent out Request for Proposals to several engineering cospantes to design such Droiect for construction; NHEREAS, the firs of L.A. Nalnstott and Associates, Inc., has represented as qualified W perfors the services 1n the Request for Proposal and was chosen by the City Engineering Staff to provide professional engineering services for Field surveys, engineering design, studies and calculations for the preparation of plans, specifications and estlaxte for Arrow Route Nidentng and Signal Proiect. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLYED, that the Lity Council of the City of Rancho Cucsaonga does hereby resolve to award and execute a Professional Services Agreeax!nt with L.A. Nalnstott and Associates, Inc., to provide professional engineering services to prepare plans, specifications and estimate for Arrow Route Widening and Signet between Grove Avenue and Baker Avenue. Such work shall be perforsed for a fee not to exceed X0,947.00 to be funded by Systems Development Fund, Account No. 22-4637-8736. A contingency iuwA_ iw a .M ni 1M ni •Aw .nw~w,.~ ..wn .w1 .M11 nl nn 4.. w. •wA11. M_A L.... use underwthe approval and direction of the City Engineer for extra work-or Change Order during the course of plan preparation. ~~~i~ I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: April 20, 1988 To: City Councii and City Manager From: Russeil H. Maguire, City Engineer ay: Jchn L. ?tartin, Asscciate Civil Cngioeer m~_. r~~ Sub,~ect: Approval and Execution of a Professional Services Agreement with J.F. Davidson and Associates, to prepare Landscape Improvement and Renovation Plans for the east side of Carnelian Street from Vineyard Avenue to Base Line Road for a fee not to exceed f14,260.00 to be funded from the Beautification Fund, Account No.21-4547-8946 Approval and Execution of a Professional Services Agreement with J.F. Davidson and Associates, to prepare Landscape Renovation Plans for the east side of Carnelian Street from Vineyard Avenue to Base Line Road for a fee not to exceed f14,260.00 to be funded from the BeautlflcaLion Fund, Account No. 21-4647-8046 along with an additional lOt contingency allowance to be established for use under the approval of the City Engineer. nmw:iarcuuwuiniaL~au The present landscape and irrigation systems on Carnelian Street do not blend between residential and commercial uses and have several voids as respecting City or developer installations and maintenance responsibilities along with various deteriorating improvements. This area has been a concern for upgrading, retrofitting and reconstruction of unsightly or damaged portions after several improvement failures due to outdated concepts, deterioration and wind damage. The intent is W bring the entire area into conformm~ce with current City standards for landscape, hardscape and irrigation. There after to include the ma,{ority of the area in the ongoing City maintenance activities. Res pe iiy su'axi lied, RHM. Attachment 3~ RESOLUTION N0. ~ ~ -~-i~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA TO AMARD AND EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAI SERVICES AOREEMENi NITN J.F. DAVIDSON AND ASSOCIATES OF RIYERSIOE, CALIFORNIA TO PREPARE PUNS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE FOR CARNELIAN STREET LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT AND RENOVATION BETNEEN VINEYARD AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD NMEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucaeonga desires to ieprove Carnelian Street as a secondary size north-south thoroughfare between Vineyard Avenue and Base Line Road, and as a consequence sent out Request for Proposals to several engineering coepanies to design such protect fpr construction; and NHEREAS, the fire of J. f. Davidson and Associates, has represented as qualified to perforw the services 1n the Request for Proposal and was chosen by the City Engineering Staff to provide professional engineering services for field surveys, engineering design, studies and calculations for the preparation of plans, specifications and estivate for Carnelian Street Ieproveaent and Renovation Protect. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaeonga does hereby resolve to award and execute a Professional Services Agreeeent with J. F. Davidson and Associates t0 provide professional engineering services to prepare plans, specifications and estimate for Carnelian Street leproveeent and Renovation PraJect between Vineyard Avenue and Base Line Road. Such work shall be perfoneed for a fee not to exceed f14,260.00 to be funded by &autlfication Fund, Account No. 21- I~II OMB L aIi .. a. v iI .< .nw .~ u. ~~.I.,) vl~ VII V ~ VI \VI VI LIIC LVII LI OLL 41111YIIL shall also be established for use under the approval and direction of the City Engineer for extra work or Change Order during the course of plan preparation, 3r - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: April 20, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager Fra\: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: John L_ Martin, Associate Civil Engineer r; ~q Subtect: Approva] of Professional Services Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and John Cutler and Associates to provide public Right-of-May Acquisition/Consultant Services for Arrow Route Improvements, Phase II between Archibald Avenue and Hermosa Street at a rrot to exceed fee of 534,000.00 ( 54,000.00/parcel plus 5650.00/tenantl to be paid from the Systems Development Fees, Account No. 22- 4637-8618. REC01/EMDATION• Approval of Professional Services Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and John Cutler and Associates to provide puDlie Right-of-Way Acquisition/Consultant Services for Arrow Route Improvements, Phase II between Archbald Avenue and Hermosa Street at a not to exceed fee of 534,000.00 ± 54,000.00/parcel plus 5650.00/tenants to be paid from the Systems Oevetopment Fees, Account No. 22-4637-8618. m\rYCOMMI/\Y\1 T'!Tf• The City has, for same time, found the present undeveloped and sub- standard widenings of Arrow Route betrreen Archibald Avenue and Hermosa Street undesireable, a public inconvenience, a trafffc bottleneck and maintenance concern. However, there are motor obstacles such as three (3) residences, warehouses and a grocery/convenience store in the path of the street improvwents. These structures would need to be removed 1n order to install the improvements to the master planned width. Staff has conducted interviews to select a firm that could represent Lhe City 1n the negotiation/acquisition process for this complicated protect. The firms acre required to show qualifications and experience in similar protects. The fires of John Cutler and Associates presented sufficient understanding of Lhe protect, a clear procedure for a[OUi sift en ar4.i nnc ornoninn~a ae Min ...~.~~..- a-.. - ... ng a rc prcac. w,.,c , I ieleral Southern California cities and presenting reasonable experience for activities. .9 ~ CCS0. April 20, 1988 Page 2 The attached Agreement includes a Scope of Services which outlines the proposal received from John Cutler and Associates which was negotiated with staff to insure a consistent effort within the guidelines established for fair and proper acqu!stticr. anC negottatior. activities. Staff tf confident that Lhe fires of John Cutler and Associates will provide the CTty with a professional acquisition and clearance of the needed right-of-way so that the street inprovements mqy be constructed. Respectf submitted, RHM: :pam Attachment 33 RESOLUTION N0. ~ 0 ~ a f A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANON6A TO ANARD AND EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CUTLER AND ASSOCIATES OF LONG BEACN, CALIFORNIA TO PROYIOE PUBLIC RIGHT- OF-YUY ACQUISITION/COIiSULTANT SERVICES FOR ARRON ROUTE IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE II BETNEEN ARCHIBALD AVENUE ANO HERMOSA STREET NNEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga desires to iagirove Arrow Route as a valor size east-west thoroughfare between Archibald Avenue and Hernosa Avenue, and as a consequence sent out Request for Proposals to several Real Estate Consultants to provide public right-of-way atquisition necessary for the construction of ulttsate toprovea~ents between Archibald Avenue and Hermosa Avenue; and NHEREAS, the fires of John Cutler and Associates has represented as qualified to perfona the services in the 0.equest for Proposal and was chosen by the City En rw;ering Staff to provide Lhe public right-of-way acquisition of severe parcels within the 1ladts of Arrow Route Reconstruction, Phase II Protect. MOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the C1q~ Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve to award and execute a Professional Services Agree~ent with John Cutler and Associates to provide public right-of-way acquisition/consultant services for Arrow Route teprovecents between Archibald Avenue and Heragsa Avenue. Such work shall be perforared for a fee not to exceed (34,000.00 ( =4000.00/parcel plus eccn nn u..-..ar a. ~_ n.-~.,~ t.. r.,.a«.. n-.._~_~--« .-..-~ •-....-• w. m, .~n+ - ... .y q.. .. r.-cn .., - ~ _ 8618. A contingency fund in an amount of lOR of the contract amount shall also be established for use under Lhe approval and direction of the City engineer for extra work o•r Change Order during the course of plan preparation. U-' -~ t 3~ n,mv nc o w win vn nr rn n w.rnw:n e STAFF REPORT Date: April 20, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer Dy: ,.ohr~ L. Martin, Assac',a•.e Civil Eny Weer Subject: Approval and Execrtion of a Professional Services Agreeicent with Associated Engineers to prepare Base LTne Road Nldening, Phase III from Yictoria Park Lane to Rochester Avenue and Storm Drain Construction for a fee not to exceed 560,000.00, to be funded fray the Systems Fund, Account No. 22-4637-8732. It 1s recommended to award and execute a Professional Services Agreement with Associated Engineers to prepare plans, specifications and estimate for Base Line Road Improvements and Storm Drain Project. Such work to be done for a fee not to exceed 560,000.00 plus 10% contingency shall be paid from Systems Development Fund. BACK9101Mt0/AMAIYSIS• un riarui~ ~i, iioii, iuur iirwa rcapuuuiny w a neyuesi. iur Frupuaaia iur the Base Line Road Project, submitted detailed scope of work, background reference and design team credentials to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Four of the funs met the professional and scope of service requirements established by staff. A ranking of the fee proposals are as follows: Associated Engineers 560,000.00 BSI Consultants 71,440.00 GPS 75,575.00 Don Greek 8 Associates 81,433.00 Staff recommends Associated Engineers for award of the project. The not to exceed fee will be paid from the Systems Development Fund and is included in the Capital Improvement Program list for 1986-87 with budget allUiaiiUn Eirerefor. Attachment Respectf y submitted, L~ ~.-µ-----r RNM:JL :pam ~ . ~~ RESOLUTION N0. O g - d ~~- R RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA TO ANARD AND EKECUTE A PROFESS[ONAL SERVICES AOREEPENT KITH ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS OF ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA TO PREPARE PLANS, SPECIFICl1TION5 AND ESTIMATE FOR BASE LINE ROAD IMPROVEMENT AND STORM DRAIN PROJEGT BETNEEN ROCHESTER AVENUE AND VICTORIA PARK LANE WEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucaonga desires to iaprove Base Line Road as a aaior divided east-west thoroughfare between Rochester Avenue and Victoria Park Lane, and as a consequence sent out Request for Proposals to several engineering coapanies to design such protect for construction; NHEREAS, the flrw of Associated Engineers has represented as quaitfied to perforw the services 1n the Request for Proposal and was chosen by the City Engineering Staff to provide professional engineering services for field surreys, engineering design, studies and calculattons for the preparation of plans, specifications and estiaate for Base Line Road iwtproveieents and Stores Drain. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve to award and execute a Professional Services Agreeaent with Associated Engineers to provide professional engineering services to prepare plans, specifications and esttaate for Base Line Road Iaproveaents and Stora Drain Protect between Rochester Avenue and Victoria Park Lane. Such work shall be perforwed for a fee not to exceed f60,0Q0.00 to be funded by Systens Developaent Fund, Account • - - r' J auwunt shaitvalso be established for use under the approval and direction of the City Engineer for extra work or Change Order during the course of plan preparation. ~~ 3~ CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: April 20, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager ~ Frain: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: John L_ Martin, Associate CiW7 Engineer Subt ect: Approval and Execution of a Professional Services Agreement with Norris-Repke and Associates, to prepare Church Street Nidening from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue for a fee not to exceed 543,300.00 to be funded fraa the Systems Fund, Account No. 22-4637-8753. IIECOMMENDATION• It is recommended to award and execute a Professional Services Agreement with Norris-Repke, Inc., to prepare plans, specifications and estimate for Church Street Improvement Protect. Such work to be done for a fee not to exceed 543,300.00 plus lOf contingency shall be paid from Systems Development Fund. BAp(61t0U11D/ANALYSIS On March 31, 1988 three firms responding to a Request for Proposals for •An rF~..n 1, Ce.nn~ D..ni w~•_ uAw.1 ~~wA Aw~.II wA -t wr4 4-..M--...-J reference and design teas credentials to the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga.- V Three of the firms met the professional and scope of service requirements established by staff. A ranking of the fee proposals are as follows: Norris-Repke, Inc.. (43,300.00 Oon Greek and Associates 50,800.00 GPS 66,400.00 Staff recommends Norris-Repke, Inc. for award of the protect. The not to exceed fee will be paid from the Systems Development fund and is included in the Capital Improvement Program list for 1986-87 with budget allocation therefor. MP/C nPf TT-111IV [IIIYPi}}p~ ~.~ I , RMM:,1L Attachment ~~ RESOLUION aD. B $ ' ~~3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANDNGII TO ANARD AND EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AEREEMENT KITH MORRIS-REPKE, INC. OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA TO PREPARE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE Fpt CHURCH STREET i14R0YENENT PROJECT BETNEEN ARCHiBALD AVENUE AND HAVEN AVENUE NHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga desl res to improve Church Street as a secondary size east-Rest thoroughfare between Archibald Avenue and Haven Avenue, and as a consequence sent out Request for Proposals to several engineering companies to design such pro,~ect far construetton; NIIEREAS, the fin of Norris-Repke, Inc. has represented as qualified to perfor* the services in the Request for Proposal and was chosen by the City Engineering Staff to provide professionai engineering services for field surveys, engineering design, studies and calculations for Lhe preparation of plans, speditcations and estimate for the Church Street Improvement Protect. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve t0 award and execute a Drofesslonal Services Agreement with Norris-Repke, Inc. to provide professional engineering services to prepare plans, specifications and estimate for the Church Street Improvement Protect between Archibald Avenue and Haven Avenue. Such work shall be perfon~ed for a fee not to exceed (43,300.00 to be funded by Systems Development Fund, Account No. 22-4637- 8753. A contingency fund in an saount of 10f of the contract amount shall •1 en b ee~,61ie1wA inn . ,w Aaw •Aw • .nl ,wA Ai ro_N nn nF Hu Piw~ Engineer far extra work or Change Order~Auring the course of plan preparation. 3$ --CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA _ STAFF REPORT Date: gpril 20, 1988 To; City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, Ctty Engineer ~ By: Richard R. Cola, Associate Civil Engineer ~~I Sub,j ect: Approval of the Environmental Initial Study Parts I and II for the proposed Hellman Avenue Storm Drain between Monte Yista Street and the Cucamonga Creek Storm Drain south of Base Line Road and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor. RECOIIN:NWITIOM: It is hereby recommended that the Ctty Council adopt the attached Resolution accepting and approving the Environmental Initial Study Parts I and I! for the proposed Hellman Avenue Storm Drain and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor and direct the City Clerk to file a Notitt of Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. BACK6ROIND/ANALYSIS: Th1s report presents an Environmental Assessment Initial Study for the yruyuaeu iieiiman Avenue Stores urain oetrreen Monte vista Street and Cucamonga Creek Stores Drain south of Base Line Road. In conformance with the California EnvirormN'ntal Quality Act and State Guidelines, the attached document has been prepared to permit construction of the above-mentioned improvements. Said improvements generally entail the construction of a 90" to 96" reinforced concrete pipe in Hallman Avenue between the above mentioned limits. Likewise, the intersection of Hellman gvenue and Base Line Road will be imporved with the removal of the existing Portland cement concrete cross-gutter across Base Line Road. It is the Engineering Staff's finding that the proposed project w111 not create a significant adverse imoact on the envtronm@nt amn therefore recam,end that these improvements be classified as Categorically Exempt. Respectful) Submitted, ~ 1 _" i~ i RNM:RRC:pam Attachments 3y RESOLUTION N0. ~ p ~~~7" A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON611, CALIFgiNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED HELLMAN AYENUE STORM DRAIN BETWEEN MONTE VISTA STREET AND THE CUCAMONGA CREEK STORM GRAIN SOUTH OF BASE LINE ROAD IAIEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has reviewed all available input concerning the proposed Hellman Avenue Store Drain Improvements; and and MfEREAS, said improvemenLS require an EnvirormKntai Assessment; WHEREAS, an EnvirormKntal Assessment Initial Study bas been prepared pursuant to the California Envirormw:ntal Quality Act, as amended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of 4he City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves the EnvironmehfaTl<ssessment Initial Study and lssuante of a Categorical Exemption for the proposed Hellman Avenue Stores Drain. SECTION 2: The City Clerk is directed to file a Notice of Exemption pursue California Environmental Quality Act. ~~~ 7 d /• i 1977 GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION INITIAL STUDY -PART I Por 311 prnj ells renoirin° env irnnmental raviaw; this form must be como letei and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Planning Division staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study and make recommendations to Planning Commission. The Planning Commission will make one of three determinations: (1) The project will have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, (2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or (3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further inf°rmation concerning the proposed project. Date filed: Project Title: Hellman Avenue Storm Drain Applicant's Name, Address, Telephone: City of Rancho Cucamonga 9370 Rasefine Rd.. P.C7. Box H07. Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91730 Name, Address, Telephone of Person To De Contacted Concerning this Project: Richard Cota, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Dept.. P.0. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 one: 7:a 989-1862 Location °f Project: Alon Hellman Avenue extendin from the Cucamon a Storm Drain (at oPacr lc Railroad to the existing trapezodial otiannel, near Monte Vista Avenue. Assessor's Parcel No.: All in Public R/W, except PJO. 2Di2 y0~ri°?grtyi)n fee at Monte Vista List other permits necessary from local, regional, state and federal agencies and iho agenry ic5il ing c°rh pwrmitc; Encroachment on public right of way - City of Rancho Cucamonga Connect to Cucamonga Storm Drain - San Bernardino County Flood Control District L,~ PROJECT DESCRIPTION Proposed use or proposed project: Desiqn and oonstr ct'nn of ~nP HPiin,a~ Avenue Storm Drain tc untlerground storm f;ows which currently d,scharge frcm an existing drainage channel onto Hellman A.v enue near Monte Vista Sf• The ornno~cd R~ 9n" - ofi" R f P anA aon rnxim=rnl„ ~.f100 foci in length. Acreage of project area and square footage of existing and proposed buildings, if any: Acreage of oroiect includes Hellmar 4venue between limits described (rrom S.P.R.P.. and Monte Vista SL ) which is estimated at 5 acres There are rn existino or ^roccsed buildings. Oescr ibe the environmental s~etti~n of the project site including information on topography, soil stabi itt y, plants (trees), land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding properties, and the description of any existing structures and their use (attach necessary sheets): The project site is Hellman Avenue; a relatively steep street (3% .) which extends from the base of the San Gabriel Mountains south to the Cucamonga Stcrm Drain and beyond. Hellman Avenue is a narrow, residential street characterized by high cobblestone curbs and tall trees. There is a small school at the northwest corner of Hellman and Baseline Rtl. (near the south end of the project) which is a moderately busy intersection. The existing IaniYnarks will be protected in place and wi;l no[ be disturhed by the proposed project. praJa pa ~ yc prod., o..,, o. ... actions, which although individually small, may as a~whole~have significant environmental impact No, the Hellman Storm Grain is an individual project. However it will flow into the Cucamonga Storm Drain, and collectively with inflow from other north and south storm drains, exceed the capacity of the Cucamonga Storm Drain, which is r_urrently under study for improvement as well. 1'he effects of the Heilman Storm Drain is subject to review and approval of the San 9ernardino County Flood Control District as a condition of this projer y~ MILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contou rs2 x 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise eP produce vibration or glare? _ x 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? x 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or General Plan designations? _ X 5. Remove any existing trees? Haw manyT ~ x 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, f lammab les or explos ives7 X Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): Consequently, there will be some need for Storm Drain maintenance, however there will be a significant decrease in street maintenance in diverting the storm run off by way of the proposed project. 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this project ... ~ y~ ~ ... ......... ..r. 8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this project: temporary cons ;ruc Lion traffic only. 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this project, in cubic yards: 23, 0 C.Y. of trenching, :5,800 C.Y. of backf ill, excess backfi 1 to be relocated o site 6y contractor. 1D. If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. n/a CERTIFICATIOM: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability; and that the facts, statemen~°, ._~ information presented are true and correct to the best of my know]edge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Enginee riny Division. +n/ (~- Date: April 8, 1988 Sign ature_ Ki~.~~.y>~ Title Assoc late Civil Engineer ~~3 RESIDENTIAL CONS iRUCTION The following information should he provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid the school district in assessing their ability to accommodate the proposed residential development. Developers are required to secure letters from the school district for accommodating the increased number of students prior to issuance of building permits. Name of Oeve toper and Tenrati:c Tract No. Specific Location of Protect: PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 70TAL 1. Number of single family units: _ 2. Number of multiple family units: _~ 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 4. Earliest date of - occupancy: _ Mode 1N and # of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Range ~~ -/ CITY' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PART II - INITIAL STUDY EHVIRON'~ffNTAL CHECKLIST RATE: April 8, 1986 APPLICANT: City of Rancho Cucamonga FIT.?NC D.,. April 20, 1968 LOG NUPIDER: 23-4ti37-8163 PROTECT: Heilman Avenue Sto[m Clain PROJECT LOCATION: Hellman Avenue - from th¢ Cucamonga Storm Drain (at the Sn. Pae. R.R, tp Nbnte Vista Street. L. ENVIRON;IENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheecs). 1. Soils and Geology. Will the proposal have s ignificane results in: a. Urs table ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. Disn,++~~,:.~, displacements, compaction oz hurial of the soil? c. Change fn topography or ground surface contour in[e rvals? ' d. The destruction, coveting oz modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any potential increase in wind ar water erosion of sails, off ec Cing either on or off site condi tons? f. Changes in erosion sil to [Lon, or deposition? a. F.xpoau r? o.' propie or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, Landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? h. An increase in the rate of extraction and/or use of any mineral resource? 2. flyd ro logy, Will the proposal have signifScant rosin is Sn: t/~/~ YES MAYHE NO x X X X ;( X X Y£S lL11 AE ;:O a. Changes in curranCS, or the course of dirge eion of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? X b. Changes in absorption races, drainage Patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X c. Alterations co the course or flaw of flood waters? X d. Change in the amcunt of surface vctc: in any body of .afar? X e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alCera Lion of surface water quality? X F. Al [era [ion of groundwater charac ceriscics? ~ g. Change in the quantity of groundwa [e rs, either through direct adds [ions or with- drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? ____ X h. The reduction in the amount of water other- wise available For public water supplies? X 1. exposure of people or property to wager r¢la [ed hazards sucfi as Flooding or seichesY _ 3- <+-. inv. will [he proposal have significant j res in [s in: a. Cons tanc or periodic air emissions From mobile ar indirect sources? X $Caciona ry Sourceal ___ ____ X b, De [e rio ration of ambient air quality andJcr interference wicN [he attainment of applicable air quality standards? ___ X c. Al ce ration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air mov¢ment, moisture or tempo ra cu re? -< v. i,i o ._ Fio rn. (Jill the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants? J _,__ X b. Red uc Cion of the numbers of any unique, rare ,~ or endan gored species of plants?s/! _~_ _, YES 'tAYOE :10 c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of planes into an area? X d. Reduction in [he po ten [iai for agricultural produc Cian? ~( Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, disCributlon, or numbers of any spec'.es of animals? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? X c. Introduction of new or disrup Give species of animals into an area, cr result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X d. Deterioration or removal of existing Fish or wildlife habitat? X 5. Population. fJill cha proposal have significant results in: a. Wi11 the proposal alter Che location, distri- bution, donsity, diversity, or growth zaCe of the human population of an areal X b. Will the proposal affect existing housin¢. m* crPar= = ?=yy,-,,; Loa aaaitional housing? X 6. Sucio-Economic Factors. Will [he proposal have significant results in: a. Change in local or re¢ional soc ia-economic charart erist ics, including economic or coom,ercial diversity, tax race, and property values? X b. Will project costs be equita6l;~ discribu [ed among prof ecC beneficiaries, i.s., buyers, tax payers or project users? X 7. Land Use and Plannin¢ Consider^ti-r,-. (vf it the V vropn <.,1 ~,,,,~ sisnif icanC results in? a. A substancial al Ce ra cion of the presenc or planned land use of an area? X b. A conflict with any designations, ohj ec [Sues, policies, or adopted plans of any Bove rnmen[al entities? X c. An impact upon the quality or quantity of exis CS ng consumptive or non-consumptive recreaCional opportunities? (/-7 _, X 8. Transportation. Will the proposal have significant results Sn: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X b. Effects on existing streets, or demand far new street cons [ruction? ~ c. Effects on existing parking facili Gies, or demand for new parking? :! ~. Substantial impact upon existing transpor[a- cian systems? X e. AI[erat ions co present pateerns of circula- tion or movement of people and/or goods? ,_~ f. Alterations to or effects on present and potential water-borne, rail, mass CtansiC or air traffic? X g. Increases Sn traffic hazards to motor vehicles, b icyclis[s of pedestrians? ~_ _ 9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have s ignificanc results in: a. A disturbance to the Integrity of archaeological, paleon tologiral, and/or hl5 to rical resources? X 10. Health. cif^~, ;:uisance F'ac tors. Will the proposal have significant res ul cs in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? X b. exposure of people co potential health hazards? X c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the evene of an accident? _,_ __ X d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or ehe exposure of people to such organisms? ._ _ n e. Increase in ex is tang noise levels? _. X _ f. Exposure of people to po ten tfaLly dangerous noise levels? X g. The creation of objectfonab la odors? ~ _„~ x h. An increase in light or glare? __ X_ ray\.`\ YES +IAYBE NO y~ -~ l ves >wyge cJo 11. Aes the[ics. Will the proposal have significant resul cs in: a. The obs[ruc [ion or degradation of any scenic vista or view? X b. The creation of an aes chetically offensive site? X c. A conflict with the objective of designated or po [ential scenic corridors? X i2. Otili[ies and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need For new systems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? X b. Natural or packaged gas? X c. Communications sys Ce-0~S? X ' d. Water supply? X e. IJastewacer fec ilitiea? ~ f. Flood control structures? X g. Solid was [e facilities? X h. Fire protection? n i. Police protection? X j. Schools? X k, parks or other recreational facilities? X 1. Pia intenance of public facilities, including . roads and flood control facilities? X m. Other governmental services? X 13. Energy and Scarce Resources. Will Che proposal have significant results in: a. ___ of aui~s cantial or excessive Fuel or energy? _ ^. X b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy. X c. An increase in the demand Far development of new sources of energy? _ X d. An increase or perpetua[ien of the consumption of non~renewabLe Eo rms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energ a re oval Lab le? x ~ ~ ,! 1~C\ YGS tNYHE NO e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or \` scarce natural resource? X 14. :fandacorv Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade [he quality of [he environmenC, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause c fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten co eliminate a plan[ or animal cemmuni ry, red~~ce e uumher or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? _, x b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, Co Che disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A ahorc-term impact on the environment 1s one which occur9 in a relatively brief, def Snltive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future), X c. Does the prcj eee have impacts which are individually limited, bur cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that [he incremental effects of an individual p: nj act are considerable when viewed 1n connection with the effects of past projec [s, and probah le fu cure projects). ~ _ d. Does the project have environmental ef.feccs which will. cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X II ..1.G. I.~.b. i ~ 1.6.a. DISCUSSION OF ENVIROt71`fENTAL EVALUATIOtt (i.e.. of affirn~e [ive answers to Ghe above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures). Soil will be removed curing trenching operations of the Storm Grain Tre nrh. Soil will be recompacted around the installed Storm Drain and the street reinforced as required. Excess soi; will he removed by the Contractor. the Construction of the Hellman Storm Drain will decrease the amount of runoff as surface water. `~° ..,,, wlii oe undergr ounded to the new sto[m drain in r1e!Iman~AVe` from Nonte Vista to south of Baseline intersect inn. routine flooding at Baseline-Hellman intersection will 6e eliminated. As such there exist potentials fcr increase in adjacent property values. Sc,E ATTACF-h'ENi FOF2 If. CCNTifJJATiCN lI I. DETERMINATION On Che basis of this initial evaluation: ^ I Find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effecc On [he environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION gill be prepared. _ I find thac although the proposed project could have a significant Fffec[ on Che environment, there will noC be a significant effecc in this case because the mi cigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the proj ec c. A NEGATIVE DE~LAAATION WILL BE PAEPARED. T £1-^-d =hc rro"road proj ec[ MAY have a significant effect on [he I-J environment, and an ENVIROMI&MT IMPACT REPORT is required. © I find the proposed project CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT per Article 19, Class 3(d), Section 15301 of the California Env' on nt t~1j~y,Act. Dace April 8, 1988 ll''..e'e'~~ signature Associate Civil Engineer Title S' ATTACHMENT TO PART II -Initial Study I.6.b. Protect costs are equitably distributed among protect beneficiaries through a per net acreage storm drain fee, charged under a "6eneral Lity Area" District. [.B.b. Construction of the Heilman Storm Crain will Significantly reduce, if not eliminate, the present runoff of surface water at the signalized Intersection of Bnse Line Road (motor arterial) and Heilman Avenue (residential collector). Said intersection will concurrently be reconstructed Yv remove a pord and cement concrete cross gutter and provide fora smoother intersection roadway crossing. I.B.e. This protect will have an interim effect on the present patterns of circulation of vehicles, people and goods for the duration of the construction period. Such circulation pattern impacts can be mitigated by the proper use of roadway warning and detour signing. I.B.g. Increases in the traffic hazards to motor vehicles, blcyelists or pedestrians may occur during the construction period. Such hazards can be mitigated by proper warning signs. I.lO.e. Local noise levels will increase during the construction of Nell man Avenue Storm Drain. These noise levels can be mitigated by restricting the hours of operation of heavy equipment and the Installation of noise attenuators on said equipment. 1.12. e. This protect will require the relocation of approximately 260 feet of 8" sewer line. ...,..;. T6~ yrujecc consrst of an inlet pipe at Monte Yista and Hellman, a storm drain in Hellman, catcA basins in or adjacent to Hellman, and a function structure to connect the Hellman Storm Drain to the Cucamonga Storm Drain. The exl5ting overflow structure at Monte V15ta which discharges runoff onto the street at Hellman will be decommissioned. I.12.1. Maintenance of the Hellman Storm Drain will be by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. I.14.c. fonstruction of the proposed Hellman Avenue Storm Drain 1s a very small part of a Comprehensive Storm Drain Master Plan. The drainage system proposed in the master plan would construct drains primarily within street rights of way or in natural drainage channels. This fact severly limits the tmpacts to primarily beneficial effects related to reduction of hazards to life and on3perty fr... t!~ ?apa^.ts of flooding. The Plan itself does not construct facilities or directly impact the physical envlrormw!nt. These impacts would occur at the time a protect is implemented. Further environmental analysis will then 6e campteted. ~~ - CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: To: From; By: Sub,~ect: April 20, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Henry Murakoshi, Associate Civil Engineer c1. ~! ~ Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II for the proposed Tryon Sidewalks from Klusman Avenue to Archibald Avenue and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor RECOMiEN011TI0M: It is hereby recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution accepting and approving the Envtrormkntal Initial Study Parts I and II for the proposed Tryon Sidewalks from Klusman to Archibald and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor and direct ilia Cfty Clerk to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant to the California Envlrormrental Quality Act. BACK6NOQp/ANALYSIS: This report presents an Environmental Assessment Initial Study for the proposed Tryor. Sidewalks from Klusman Avenue to Arch9hale •„o.,,~e In conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State Guidelines, the attached docuaent has been prepared to permit construction of the above-mentioned improvements. Said improvements generally entail the sidewalk installments, wheel chair ramps and driveway approaches. It is the Engineering Staff's finding that the proposed pro,~ect will not create a significant adverse impact on the envirorwent and therefore recommend that these improvements be classified as Categorically Exempt. Respe~ctfull ubmitted, Attachment RESOLUTION N0. ~ U ~~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONIENTAL INITYAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EKEI4TION FOR THE PROPOSED TRYON SIDENALKS FROM KLUSMAN AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE VMEREAS, the City Council of the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga has reviewed all available input concerning the proposed Tryon Sidewalks; and NHEREAS, said improvements reQUire an Environmental Assessment; and NHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Initial Study has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. NOM, THEREFORE, BE fT RESOLVED that the C1ty Council of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves the EnvironmenTal- s~sment initial Study and issuance of a Categorical Exemption for the proposed Tryon Sidewalks. SECTION 2: The City Clerk is directed to file a Notice of Exemption pursuan California Environmental Quality Act. ENVIIiONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION INITIAL STUDY ° PART I GENERAL For all protect: re4uir?ng enviroxaestal review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the protect application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Planning Division staff will Drepare Part II of the Initial Study and make recommendations to Planning Commission. The Planning Commission wilt make one of three determinations: (1) The protect will have no siggnificant environmental i~act and a Negative Declaration will be filed, `2) The protect will have a significant environmental impsct and an Enviroivaental Smpact Report w111 be prepared, Or (3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant glving further information concerning the proposed protect. Date filed Protect Title: Trvon Sidewalks Applicant's Name, Address, Telephone: Citv of R ncho Cucamonga az D 8a< Line Road, Rancho Cucamnnga. rn a, nn Mame, Address, Telephone of Person Ta Aa Contacted Concerning this Protect: Renrv Murakoshi, Associate Civil Engineer r ~ irv n v loomrnt Deoa rtment. Citv of Rancho Cucanronua, CA 989-1862 Location of Protect: from Klusman Avenue to Archibald Avenue _ Assessor's Parcet• No Ust other permits necessary fray local, regional, state and federal agencies and the agency issuing such permits: _ SS PROJECT DESCRIPTIDN Proposed use or proposed project: r t cid a7k ro ma rh a ictiny and wheelchair ramps i +av pnrg rhes alc g rrvnn CtrPPt from Klusman Avenge to Archibald Avenue and along- lanP,tP AyP~nP labout 5U0' north of Acreage of proJoct area and square footage of ex tsting and proposed build togs, 7f any: _. _. _ N!A Describe the environmental settln gf the Dro~ect site including tnformatton on topography,- so~T sta y, pants (trees land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding properties, and the description of any existing structures and their use (attach necessary Sheets): r~n pro iee•r li<_c in_h~icy rwc idwntiat streets. _rhj ch carry _ moth vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Pavement widths are 36' Garb to n •'rh t aff;r lanec Pa rkina is permitted along both sides of the <rrPPrc wpm rhP <pPPn t;mit ie as PiPN. The neiahbarhood 15 made up of older single family dwellings. as well as recently developed dwellings. Presently, oedestri an traffic is forced to wall ar rn« i,~.•rr o ~~- - - , (, vni.iuy the pr~pP rt iac 's thg project par's of a larger praJect, one of a series of cOmulative act tans, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact .matt protect and has no significant environmental impact. ~r~ 4ILL THIS PROJECT• YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? ~ 2. Create a substantial vibration or glare? change in existing noise of produce 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, eta lT 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or General Plan designationsl 5. Remove any exist tng trees2 How many? g -~. 6. Create the need for use or dl5pasal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, f lammab les or exp las ives7 Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additlonal sheets if necessary): m No. 5 - Three 3 trees at Lot 208-123-5 shall be relocated beyond the sidewalk. All other six (b) trees of diameter more than 6" are to be __ rerx,ved and disposed of to facilitate constru tion of the sidewalk 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this protect will generate daily; 8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this pYOtecL•_ u..._ 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this protect, in cubic yards:~No~ 10. If the protect involves the construct ton of residential units c the Iorm on the next page. + on4lete CERTIFIGTIO~: ! hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that *_he facts. ;tateiaPnr< and infenaatlor, presented are true and correci to the best of my knowledge and belief. !further understand that additlonal information may be required to 6e submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Planning Otvision. Oate:~~58 Signature ~/ /Zt~o~eiC~ envy mrac ~--- Title Associate Civil Engineer S7 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following !nfonnatfon should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga P'. anning Division 1n order to aid the school district in assessing their ability to accommodate the proposed residential development. Developers are required to secure letters from the school district for acconrndat!.^.g t`.>: increased nunber of stuaentt prior to issuance of building permits. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No. Specific Location of Prolect: PHASE I PHASE Z PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single fatuity units: 2. NumEer of mwltipte fatuity units: 3. Date proposed to begin tonstruetion: 4. Earliest date of occupancy: ._ Mode l• and f of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Ranae J o ' CITY OP gANCAC CUCA)tONCA PART IZ - INITIAL STCDY ENVIRON`D:b"IAL CHECKLIST APPLTCA.NT: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Community Development Department FILZNG DATE: LOO NDMHEA: PROJECT: TrYOn Sidewalks PROJECT LOCATION: from Klusman Avenue to Archi bolo Avenue I. ENVIRONMENTAL It~@ACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). YES. HAYRE NO 1. Soils and Geolo¢v. W111 the proposal have significant sesul[s in: a. Unstable ground condlilons or in changes in b. Disruptions, diap lacemancs, compaction or burial of the soil? ~ X c. Change in topography or ground surfac: contour inurvals? _ ~ x d. The destruction, covering or modlficetion of any uaiqus geologic or physical features? Y e. My puantial increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off sip mndi tons? ~ ~ f. Ganges in ..ce'a.^. cilia ior, oe dePOlitioni -~ ~ JL g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- siides, ground failure, or simllu hasarda? -__ ~L.. h. M increase in the race of extraction and/or use of any mineral resource? _ ~ Z. Aydro loav. Will the proposal have algnificant rssulaa in: ~r-q J / Page 2 YES wAYHE \o a. Changes in torten cs, or [hs course of direction of floving screams, rivers, or epheaeral stream channels? X 6. Changes So ebsorp cion rates, drainage peeterns, or the rate and amoune of ausface vacer runoff? ~ x c. Alterations Ca the course ar flow of flood waters? x d. Change in the amount of surface aster in any body of vacer? Y e. Discharge into surface voters, or any alteracioo of surface voter quality? __ Y f. Alteration of gzaundvater characteriatlcs? ~ __ x g. Change in the quancitq of groundwatera, wither through direct additions or with- drawals, or through Snter£erence vieh en aquifer? Quell eyt Quantlcq? _ ~ z h. The ftduct ion in the amount of vacer otber- wise available for public water aupp11u7 _ -__ x 1. Exposure of oeoote ~ __ __ _- j - reiaced hasarda aueh as flooding or seichea? _ X 3. Air Dualf ty. Will the proposal have •ignlfltant reaulta in: a. Conatans or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect soureast x Seationary oourcea2 ~ z b. W[erloratlon of ambient air quality and/or dnterferanca with the attainment of applicable air quality stand¢da? _ x c, Alteration of local or regional climatic eonditiona, sffaciina air nu+v.Lne^.t, s!stu:: or tempera cure? __ ~ 4. Biota Flora. Y111 the proposal have significant results in: a. Change !n the charac teriscle^ of species, including diversity, die tribe cfon, of number of any specie of plants? x b. Reduction of eha numbers of any unique, rsre or eadsngfrad species o[ planes?~O ~ ~~ x ?age } YES `9.1YBE ~o c. Introduction of mev or disruptive species of plants into an area? ___ x d. Redaction fa the potential For agricul coral produe cion? _ _- x Fa_na. Will the proposal have significant rnsul [s in: a. Change is the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or nus~bet! of any species of animals? x b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare of endangered species of arlmals? x c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an araa, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animtle? ~ x d. Decerio ration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? _ _ _ ~ 5. Population. Will tha proposal have •ignlficaac reaUlCa 1:10 a, viii chn p:opoaal alter the location, distrl- 6uclon, density, divarsi[y, or growth rate of the human population of an area? r _ _ y b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create • demand for additional howiag? - ~ b. Soc io-Economic Factors. W111 the yroposal have significant zasulta Sn: a. Change 1n local or seglonal aoclo-econamic eharaeuristlcs, Secluding economic or co®erclal dlverai ty, tax race,. and propartp valwa? ~ ~ b. W111 protect costs be equLtably 8letribu ted among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or prof ect users? ~ ~ , i. land Use and Plannlna Conslderatfons. Will the proposal have significant raaults in? a. A tub ecaneial alteration of the Dresent or planned land usa of an arts? ~ D. A conflict with any designations, ob~ecclves, pollc its, or adcn cqd plans of any governmental entities? ~ _ ~ c. M impact upon the q~laity or quantity o[ axSsting eonaumptlve or non-conaumptlva recraaeional opportunitlas? 6 ~ _ ~ X.. Page 4 Y=S "AY9E YO 8. TransoortalSon. Nill the proposal have significant results 1a: a. Genezatlon of subatantia] additional vehicular mvemant? -_ 7L 6. Effette on existing atreats, or demand for neV aCL!!t COaa[n<CiOa? c. Effects ca ax::ting parking facilities, oz demand For acv parking? ~_ ~ d. Subetantlal impact upoa existing Cranaporta- tlon sgetema? -- ~ e. Alterations to pzaeent pat terra of circula- tion or mvemaat of people sad/or goods? ~L f. A1[eratloaa to or affects on present and potential va[er-borne, tail, mass transit or air traffic? - ~ Y g. inczeaees !a traffic hazards to mtos vehicles , blcyelises or pedeseriaaa? -~~ Y 9. Cultural Resources. Aill the erapoaal have •ignifieaat resulu in: a. A dlsturbanca to the integrity of arehaeola¢ical. p~:.vu w:ugicu, and/or historical resources? -- 10. Health. Sai etv end Nuisance Paetozs. N111 the ~ Y proposal have significant reeal [a Sa: •. Craatlon of any health Aazard or potential health hazard? -- D. Exposure of people to potential Aaalth hazards? _ ' x x -- c. A risk of explosion or relaese of hazardous aubetancu in cM aver[ of an accident? - x d, An incraaae in the number of individuals or epacles of vector oz eathenogerlc o:g:r.i:ms er the azposur^ of people [o such organisms? -- -~_ 7L e. Zncreas• !n axfating noise levels? -- --_ lL f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levala2 ~_ 1L g. The craatlon of object lonabl• odors? 1L h• M lnereaee !n light or glere? ~_ ~ Page S YES !'AYHE Y'J 11. Aes thetics. WS71 [he proposal have aignif icant rea ul cs in: a. The obstruction of degradad.on of any scani< vista or view? % b. The czeation of an aesthetically afEenalve site? _ __ 1c <- A s~nflict •rStS :ha obl eetiva of deaigosted Or potential scenic corridors? ~ __ ~ 12. Ut ilitles and Fublit Services. W111 the proposal have a significant Head for nw eyatema, or al[ era[iona to [he following: a. Electric paver? __ ~ b. Natural or packaged gut _~. y c. Comunieationa systems? ~ __ y, d. Water supply? _ ~ ,~ e. Wutwatar facilicfea? _ _, Y f. Flood control structures? % g. Solid wuce facilltLs? h. Fire protection? ~ __ ~ 1. Police procectlonT ~ ~ 1. Schools? _- ~ k. Parka or other racraacional facilities? _ ~ 1. Nalntanancs of public facilities, including roads and flood control fac111t1sa1 _ ~ L ^. Other govatnmantal •ervicssl ~ ~ 13. EnaraY and Scar<e gasour gip. Will the nrapasal ~ haves sig..^.!ficaat raavita in: a. Uaa of anbacanclal or erceasiva fuel or energy? _ ~_ ~ b. Subatancial increase Sn dmand upon aalating wurces o,' energy? .._ __ ~ c. M increua in the demand [or dwelopmenc of new sources of enargyT _ ~ d. M Sncraan or parpetwcfon of the consumption of non-esnwsbla forma o[ energy, when Leaslble ranwabl• sources oC energy are availab lsT _! ~ 63 Fags 5 YE5 vAYHE YO e. Subs[snt!sl depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? _ _! ~ 14. Mandatory Findln¢s of 5!¢n£f icance. a. Does the project have the potential Co degrade the gwliey of the environment, substantially reduce the habits[ of fish or vlldlif• species, cause s fish or wildlife popula [ion co dzop bales waif sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate ^ plan[ or animal communitq, reduce the number or rescricc the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate lmportaat examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? _ ~ b. Does the prof etc have the potential to achieve short-tern, to she disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-ten impact on eha emlironsmc is one which occurs is a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- cen impacca will endure yell into the future). ~ c. Doss she project have impacts which are individwlly limited, but eusnilativelq considerable? (Cumulatively eonsidsrabla means that the lacrewetal effeeta of an indivldwl project era considerable vbep viewed in connection with the effects of peat oro 1. rr. ..,u prwoa¢le rucure projacca). _ ~ d. Does the project have env£to~epcal effaets which will cause substmtial advera• eE£eees on human beings, either direttly or ipd lreetly? ,_ ~ I2. DISCVSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALVAiION (1. e., of affirmaclve answers to the above queacions plus a discussion o! proposed mitigation mesaures). K~ r Page 7 III. DETERYINATI09 On the buia of this lnitlal cvaluatlon: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect XX on the emironmsne, and a CATEGORICAL EXENPTIOHvill be prepared. I find that although the prapoud project could have a eignificanc I I effacc on the em£ro~ant, there will noe be a significant effect LJ in this case becauaa tha mlclgaclon maasuzaa dutribed on an attachtd sheet hate been added to tha proj sc t. A NECATZYE DEOLARATTON itILL EE PP~lRED. L flad the proposed project NAY h+va • significant effect on the tnvirtmeot, and an ENVIA09MENT L~ACT REPORT is required. r Dart y.-! 3-p5' 9lgnacure Henry Murakoshi Associate Civil Engineer TSCL 7"^~ - CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONCA STAFF REPORT Oate: April 20, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager `` From: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Turning Mamsaang, Engineering Aide Sub,{ect: Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts T and II, for the proposed Slurry Seal Program 1987-88, Phase II for various City streets (see Maps to Staff Report) and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor. RECOMIEMOilTIOM• It is hereby recommended that the Initial Study, Part I, Environmental Review Application and Part iI, Environmental Checklist be reviewed and approved by the Ctty Council and that a Notice of Exemption be approved for filing with the County Clerk for the prodect under the guidelines of the Ca/iforrla Environmental Quality Act. BACI(9tW ID/AWILRSIS in accordance with the California £nvlronmental Quality Act, pro,Jects to maintain existing roadway streets without widening have been predetermined not to have a significant effect on the envlromaent, and aro AsN nnataA fnr 'rarennrl ral Fxawnf7nn" frnr nnvT rnnmenLnl ravi aw, Said streets to 6e rehabilitated have been broken into five Districts, including two alternate Districts A and R. The vicinity and site maps are hereto attached. Said improvements generally entail i) asphalt - rubber crack and ,Joint sealing, 2) removal and replacement of asphalt concrete pavement prior td crack sealing and placement of slurry seal mixture, 3) slurry aDpltcation, 4) rat sing utility valve t0 grade, 5) remove and replace sewer MH concrete collar, 6) installation of raised pavement markers for fire hydrant locations, and 7) the repainting or restriping of the pavement for traffic control. Respectful} submitted, ~!. ) _,. RH :TI . Attachment ~~ RESOLUTION N0. 8 () ' C/ Ih A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATE60RICAL E%EMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED SLURRY SEAL PR06RAM 1987-88, PHASE II FOR VARIOUS CITY STREETS MiEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has reviewed all available input conrerning the proposed Slurry Seal Program, 1987-88 (Phase I11; and NHEREAS, said program requires an Environmental Assessment; and NHEREAS, an Enviromaental Assessment Study has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental 4uality Act, as amended. NON, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED that the C1ty Council of the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves the Environmen~T s~sment Initial SWdy and issuance of a Categorical Exemption for the proposed Slurry Seal Program, 1987-88 (Phase II ). SECTION 2: The City Clerk is directed to file a Notice of Exemption pursuan California Environmental Quality Act. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPIEO this ZOth day of Apr11, 1988. ,VCC. NOES: ABSENT: enn s u yor ATTEST: every u e e y e p ENYIRONI4IENTAL BEVIEW APPLICATION INITIAL STUDY -PART I sENERAI car all protacis reQUiriny environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Oeve lopment Review Committee through the department where the protect application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Planning Division staff will prepare Part II of the lnitfal Study and make recommendations to Planning Caanisslon. The Pianning Comatssion will make one of three determineLlans: (1) The protect will have ne siggnificant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, t2) The protect will have a significant environmental i~aet and M Envirasnantal impact Report will be prepared, or (3) M additional information report should be supplied Dy LM applicant giving further information concerning the proposed protect. Date Filed Protect Title: ~~ Irv Seal Program 1987-88 (phase tI) Applicant's Name, Address, Telephone: Citv of Rancho Cucas~onga P.U. Box 807. Ranchn furamnn.+> ra o+ »n ~~+•~ ~~~, ~~a Name, Address, Telephone of Person To Be Contacted Concerning this Protect: Richard R. Coca, Associate Civil Engineer a nh h hove Location of Protect: City of Rancho Cucamonga. Various City Streets Assessor's Parce>• Nd.: Public Streets List other permits necessary tram local, regional, state and federal agencies and the agency issuing ouch per!ts• Mona ~~ PROJECT gESCRIPTIDN proposed use or proposed project: n i is of as halt-rubber crack and joint sealing, removal and replacement of roadway pavement, 5 urry app ;cation., repainting and Acreage of project area and square footage of existing and proposed buildings, if any: 22 27 Acres N a •cr;pp n~prannsed buildings Describe the environmental sett in of the project site including information on topography, so sta ty, pants (trees), land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding properties, and the description of any existing structures and their use (attach necessery sheets): The ono iect sites are located in developed residential tracts. All ~..oor .n~o~,,.nr< nave existed for several years. The proposed improvements _y,j 11 notmha ve a substantial_impact on~lants or animals, and land resources or obvious histo rica., cu to ra er scenic aspec s. is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact n~ ~9 PILL THIS PROJECT: VES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contaurst _ ~ 2. Create a substantial change 1n existing noise of produce vibration or glaret ~ 3. Create a substantial change 1n demand for municipal services (po lice, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or General Plan designatians7 ~. 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? ne 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammaDies or ezplosives7 Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets 1f necessary): 7. Nnicp and vibration will increase at the oro sect site only during slurry sealing ooe rations. After comoleti on of project noise and vibration levels will return to existfno levels. 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste matarial< rh+. ,.~,.~._._._ writ generas0 Daisy: _ None 9. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this prat ect: _; 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this protect, 1n cubic yards: 103.89 10. If the protect involves the construction of residential units, crngiete the form on the next page. CERTIFIGTi011: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and informstton required for this sniff al OYAluati0n tG file best of my anitiiu ..• •,... •~_ . one inforinatian presented are true and correct to the best~o4~mysknowledgenand belief. !further understand that additional informtettan may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the planning Division. ~~ /~~`/^' Date: Aoril 2U L19o8 Signature YC..X.o~eJ'C~ Tftie Associate Civil Engineer y~~ RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following information should be provided to the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid the school district in assessing their ability to accommodate the proposed res ldential development. Deve Topers are reeuired to secure letters from the school district For aceommodating the increased number of students prior to issuance of building permits. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Locat tan of Pra~ect: PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 DHASE 4 TO1Al 1. Number of stogie family units: 2. Number of muitiple family units: __ 3. Date proposed t0 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Model/ and i of Tentatlw 5. Bedrooms Price Range 7~ ' ~ ~ -~' , CITY 07 RANCHO CIIC.LYONCA PART IZ - INITIAL SIZIDY ENVTRONLffNTAL CHECKLIST HATE: April 20. 1988 APPLICANT: Citv Of Rancho Cu[aon0a FILING DATE: April 20, 1988 LDG NIIC~ER: 15-0637-GU50 PROJECT: Slurrv Seal Proara 1981-bH (Pha@~jI) PROJECT LOCATION: f.ity of Ranchn furamonoa. Various Citv Streets I. ENVIRONt1eNTAL II4+ACT5 (Explanation of all "yea" and "zuybe" answers are squired on attached ahee[s). 1. Soils and Geolo¢y. W111 the propossl have axgnif icant results in: a. Unstable ground conditions ar in chengee Sn e~~l-elm aaiarxonsnxpst b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface contour EncarvalaY d. Tha destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical featuraa? •. My pocantlal inereaee in wind or voter erosion of soils, affecting elthar on or off sin condicona? f. '~.^-a^.ga~ in erasion siita[SOn, or depofit ion? g. Exposure of people or property co geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- alidas, ground failure, or similar hazards? h. M increase in Che ran of extraction and/or use o[ any mineral eaeourn? 2. Hydrology, Will Che proposal have significant results in: 7a YES ?fAYBE NO X ._- X. __ ~ . ~ ~_ ~C _ ~ x _ ~ ~ ?a gs ? YES MAYBE VO a. Changes in currents, or the course of dlzection of floving streams, rivers, or ephemeral scream channels? ,_ ~ b. Change9 iv absorp cion rates, drainage patterns, or the race and amount of surface eater runoFf? c. Alteration! co the course or flow of flood watara? ~ d. Change in the amount of surface racer in any body of racer? r- ~ e. Discharge into ausface waters, or any al teratlon of sur£aee vacar Quality? -_ Y_ f. Alteration of groundwater eharactaristica? ~ ~ g. Change iv the quanti tq of gtoundratere, eieher through direce addiciovs oz rith- dravals, or through laterterenee rich an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? _- ~ h. T!:e reduce ran in the amount of vaGr other- visa available for public water supplies? ~ ~ ~ 1. Ernolure of nrnn t. -- :~ -;, -~, ' related hazards euch as flooding or aeiches? L 3. Afz Qualf ty. Yl13 eha proposal have ^ignltieant ruulb in: e. Constant or periodic •lr emissions trom mobile or indirect sources? Scatlonary eourcesl ~ Y_ b. Deceriora[!on of embienc air quality and/or Snurbrevice with the actalnment of appllesbl• alr gwlity standards? - _~ ~ c. Alteration of local or regional Climatic cvnditlons, affecting a±r ~----n t, .;.is ter: of [emDerature? __ L 4. Bi its Flora. M111 the proposal have slgnificanc results ini •. Change 1n the characteristics of species, including dlvara lcy, distribuc!on, oz number of any specles o! plants? _ ~_ ~ b. geduet ion of the numbers of any unigl~e, rare oL eodanpnd specles of plants? 7 ~ .8.. c. Introduction of new or disrup clue species of plants into an area? d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural produc Cion? Fa_na. 41111 the proposal 'have aignificanc reeul to in: a. Change !a the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? b. Reduction of the numDars of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Inerodueeion of nav or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to [ha migration or mvesnnt of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of mating fLh or wildlife habitat? 5. Population. Will the proposal have •ignificant rsaulta in: a. Will the ptoposal altar the Iota tips, diatri- 6ueion, denaiey, diversiey, or grouch rate of the human population of an araa7 b. NS31 she proposal affect existing housing, or crease a demand for addltlonal houaingT 6. gocio-Econonie Factors. 17111 the proposal haws aignificanc results in: •. Change in local or regional socio-economic charactariscles, including economic os co®ercial diversity, tax ran, and property valugT b. Will proles[ costs 6e equitnblq diatzl6ut ed along pro}ect 6eneficlarlas, F.e., buyers, tax payers or pro}ect users? i. Land Use and Planning Cpnaideratlone. Will the proposal have significant reaul to in? a. A substantial alteration of th• present of planned land use of an araa2 D. A conflice with any designations, ob}ectives, policies, or adop ud plans of any governmental entitles? c. M impact upon the qulaity or Quantity of existing consumpc ive or non-consumptive rserucional opporcunlciaa7 -7i/ ?axe 3 YES :.AYSE \0 _ x _ x __ ,-, X _ ~ X _ x ~. _~ 11_ ~~. ~ __ ~ ~- _~ _ ~~ ~ d^ Page YES lAY3E v0 8. Iranssortation. Nill the proposal have significant rneul es ia: a. Generation of aubstanclal additional vehicular movement? x _ A- b. Effects on exfeting sCreacs, or demand far nex atret construction? x c- Effetts an azlzaag parking iac iiities, ar dmand for nay parking? X d. Substantial Smpact upon existing transporta- tion aystest _ ~ x a• Alterations to praaent patNrns of circula- tion or movement of people and/or goods? X f. Alterations to or effstes on present and poCSneial your-borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? x g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyellats oz pedetrlans? 7L 9. Cul coral Reaouress. Will the proposal have _ _. _ significant ruulCS in: a. Adis turbanc• to the integrl[q of archaeological, 1 ~~-~~--.. •'al~°i• sou%or nlatO iiCal LlsoUtCea? ~~ X 1G. Health, Safety and Nuisance Factors. Nill the proposal have significant results 1.n: a. Creaelon o[ any health hazard or potential heal [h hazard? -- _~ ~ b. Exposure of pwpl• to potential helth hazards? --- 7L c. A risk of s:plosion or ralsae of hazardous substance in the went of a accident? -~ 7L d. M Sncnas• in the number of individuals or species o[ vector or pathenogenic ....-. ^'°° "' ~..a .aposur• of poop le co such ~° organlams? -__ 7L e. Inc raase in existing noise levels? ~- ~_ _ f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? - -- -2t g. The creation of ob.~,ectionable odors? _ ~- ~ h. M lncreae in light or glaraT - -__ JL ~~ Pa3e 5 YES }'AYbE VO 11• Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results 1n: a.' The oba traction or degrade Llon of any scenic visa or view? _ ~ b. the creaeion of an aesthetically offensive site? _ A x c. A conflict with the ob?ec rive of designstd or potential aeenic corridors? ,_, ~ 12. Uti lities and Pu611c Services. Will eha proposal have a signifleanC and for nw systems, or alt erations to the fo13ow1ag: a. Elect rie power? ~ b. Natural or packaged guT _ ~ c. Cn®URltatiOna e)/t WT -_ __ „j~ d. Wscer supply? ,__ ~_ g e. Waatwacez faclllciea? _. ~ Y. £. Flood coatrol atruciuree7 __ Y g. Solid wears tacilltfaa? _ X h. Fire pzo[ection2 _, ~y_ _ 1. Police pro[ectionT _, ,.,Y,,,_ J. Schools? ~ _~ _ k. Parks of other Yatrescional !still ties? _ ~~ ,~ 1. Naintenaaca of public facil iciea, including roads and flood control facllltlesT y, _ m. Other gowromental sarvlnaT ,~ ~ ~ 11. EnerSy and Scatce Reaoureaa. Will the proposal have significant :eauiia in: a. Usa of wbatantial or eacaulva fwl or energy? _ ~ b. Substantial increase In demand upon salating sources of energy? _ ! _ ~ c. M Increase iu the dsauad for development of sew tourcu of energy? _ ~ ~, d. M Ineraaaa or parpecwcion of cha conaump tion of non-nnwable forma of snergy, when feu ibis ranwabla wurces a[ gy are ave11ab1aY , _ ~ _ ~~ ?age 6 e. Subatancial depletion of any nonrerevable ar scarce natural resource? 14. Handatorv Plndin¢s of Si¢nifitan e. YES :AYBE VO -- .L a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the gwlity of the environment, subscancfaily reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, caws a fish or vildlifa population to drop baiov uif auacalning levels, threaten to ellminata a plane or animal cemmwity, reduce the nw~ber or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal er ellainau important esamplee of the major perlode of California history or prehia tot7? __ ~ b. Does the prof etc have the pocenelal to achieve abort-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, mvironmencal goale7 (A short-wtf impact on ehe emlreosent L one vhith occuse is a ralaeively brief, deflnielve period of time while loeg- term lmpacea will endure yell into ehe future). _ ~ ~ c. Dees the prof eat have Smpaete vhic6 ua individwllq limited, but cumulatively considera63a7 {Cumulatively eomaiderable means that ehe incremental effects of as individwl project ors eonalderable when viewed in connection with ehe effecu of out nra+..... ana prooaDle future prof acts). __ JL d. Does the prof eat have anvSronmental effaces which will cause eubacancial adverse effaces on human beings, either dlractlq or Sndlrectly? e s. II. DISCUSSION OP ENVIRONMENTAL AVAIUAIIDN (i.a., of affirmative answers co the above gwationa plus a discussion of proposed mieigaclon muaures). See attached sheet. 77 Page 7 III. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: ^ I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on Che environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATZON will be prepared. _ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant I I effect on the enviro~ent, there will no[ be a significant effect L-1 in Chia case because the miciga eion measures described on an attached sheet have bean added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATZON i7ILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed Droj at[ HAY haver significant effect on the envir~meaq and in ENVIRONMENT LMPACT REPORT is required. I find the proposed project CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT per Article 19, Class 1(c). Section 15301 of the Cali ,n' Env~onDieptal Quality Act Dste April 20, 198b l~ (`~~ Signature Associate Civil Engineer Title v ., '\ ~,`, \\ 7~? II. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation 1. Soils and Geology b. There will be subgrad! soils and aggregate base preparation and compaction for the replacement of sections of asphalt concrete pavemen :. 6. Soc1o-Economic Factors b. Protect costs are equitably distributed among project beneficiaries through Lhe implementation of ,Senate Bill No. 300 funding. 8. Tran5DOrtat{On a,b,c,e b g. During slurry sealing operations, traffic and parking will increase on surrounding streets near the project perimeter. Alterations to present patterns of vehicular and pedestrian circulation or goods and also traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians daring construction can be mitigated by the proper use of roadway warning and detour signs. 10. Health, Safety and Nuisance Factors e. Existing noise levels will increase due to equipment operations during construction, but could ba mitigated by the instaiiatton of noise attenuators and the restriction of hours of operation of equipment. 12. Httli tips anA Puh17r SPrri rP h,i,f. This protect will leave an interim effect on the present pattern of circulation of vehicles (i.e., police, fire, school). Such circulation pattern impacts can be mitigated by prior notification to the respective agencies of the proposed street work, giving time, date and duration of said work. 1. The proposed project will Improve the pavement surface and sections of pavement sutgrade. 80 ,~ sr .~~ _ > ~~~ ++ ,- Ave - ~. y, ~ E^~.p. o~SrR~ Healhel ~" `' > -jo> °„ "- ~ £ 4 ^0.G~ _ ~ 74TH ~. Nn Rin9_ Healnn~l a' Rini a a~1 ~•4vr j a vl~. , ~v as ! e La Vin :~ a~ Al1A LCMA ' i 3 La Grande SI FIEM. SCH. i 3 0 n ~ . ~ Lomlla N ~o~ClaCl _ _- r w Ela o N = ~ Mosa pr j ~ z MNP. w ~ ~b wgrberds w ~= CIiY HAIL oO°j\ JCL > rro ^ P 5 Q._ RnAD Q ---- 6 `SCM. dY~ C 0 S~On 5~ Hemlock v N Q a Tnn 0 3 "> S Y ~ 71I Q I~Lf Jl ~MNP SL PARK n ~ - J Y ' Fr ~~ '~~ v °1NOi\•iCh ~-EI NOlwifk Ya S J- 51' - I w ~Elt~en SI SL. . ~ ~,.,, '• ~~~ ~ ~ E!!en 51. ~'\JJ••gynr M1 6' l E m - ~•,~^ ~ > da i In SI. ° - Hoad ~" U a°"L''0i: Simi ~ ~ iann~n E Slallord 51. ~~ o° c19:VlY 51 p NIT ~ ~ MONTESSORI ~ ESi acia °..• ~~__U-n m c ~ ~ SCN.S_ _.. SI- UW ~ESiaaaq clco m EQ BLVD rnrM U Y f(1DSHILL.E .Sfim:.^n~~~ SLURRY SEAL PHASE II N 198? - 88 S~ VICINITY 8s INDEX MAID ~ t. `m~ Syh~~4\ ~a fl VOA Vi °oc . pla 0w^ 8a ia•~ca . a c_ L r l,Al //r. %II~' QI~ ~~ L_~ W J 2 W Q x Q x LEGEND SLURRY SEAL FIRE HYDRANT .~P~~?a~ gTYOFRJWCHO CU NHS TITLE SLURRY SEAL PHASE III ~ \ (SITE M 1987-88 ~-3 N DISTRICT NO. 1 J ~ I L l9 TH STREET W I~ W 41 24• ~ W Q 2 ~ W a '1lCT•CRJ Q R ET ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ Q W Z h Y a 3 Z3 h Z W m r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ W ~ Q MONTE V/S•TA •STR£ET ~ ~i~ ~ Wr ~ ~~ -~ ~~ ~ ~ !. .. ., , LA V/NE STREET ~ ~z~ DISTRICT NO• 2 LEGEND ` SLURRY SEAL CS FIRE HYDRANT • APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF R d R PATCHING c~`O1A+o . N T S ~,~~°°~; CITY Of RANCHO CU TITLE U ~ ,' SLURRY SEAL PHASE I) SITE 1987-88 8y N <-; '""I f t C J Q LEGEND L1 FIRE HY6RANT ~"~ SLURRY SEAL CITY OF RANCHO S 1 TITLE SLURRY SEAL PHASE II 1 \ SITE MAP it IS87-ss ~s N DISTRICT NO• 3 J ~ 1 9 T H T• w ~:- w > v~ a > 4 q > yIy~~ U' y Q D ~ T 2 S 3 ~ a ~ U w w >j MIGNONETTE ST• MIGNONETTE ST-= jj ~ U 3 3 y Y K ~ w 23~ m HOLLY ST• Y q LJ a Z W ~ f y ~' I : _. J • ~ tS _ ~ A R VICTO - I I r ALTERNATE A LE flEND 0 SLURRY SEAL 'J FIP.E HYvnANT • APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF R 9 R PATCHING ~ luuuu~ w a Z 0 Q 2 ~_ Z W a a 0 W S - - - - - -S-P °R-R- - __.. - - - ALTERNATE 8 LEGEND ~~, SLURRY SEAL P1 FIRE HY~RGNT • APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF R 9 R PATCHING ccciHn, ~ TITLE ~,.~ '~,~ CITYOFRAN~.>f~0 °' '~~« ~ SLURRY SEAL PHASE II $ITE MAP ~~===y 1987 - 8 S ~~ N 19 ii ---CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Oate: April 20, 1988 , To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer oy: Kenneth Fung, Assistant Civil Engineer Subject: Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II for the proposed Archibald Avenue Sidewalks, Phase II from Foothill Boulevard to 6th Street and adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor. ~ RECOI~EIMTION: It {s hereby recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution accepting and approving the Enviromcental Initial Study Parts I and tI for the proposed Archibald Avenue Sidewalks, Phase II and issuance cf a Categorical Exemption therefor and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. BACK®tOUND/AINLTSIS: This report presents an Environmental Assessment Initial Studv for the proposed Archibald Avenue Sidewalks, Phase II between Foothill Boulevard and 6th Street. In conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State Guidelines, the attached document has been prepared to permit construction of the above-mentioned improvements. Said pro,lect entails the construction of sidewalk and wheelchair ramps at various locations along Archibald Avenue. It is the Engineering Staff's finding that the proposed protect will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and therefore recommend that these improvements be classified as Categorically Exempt. Raspectfully~subP_itted, /', RHM:KF: Attachment g RESOLUTION N0. 8 D ' ~ ~ / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON611, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENYIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY ANO ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED ARCHIBKD AVENUE SIDENALKS, PHASE II FROM FOOTHILL BOULEVARD TO 6TH STREET kHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucauonga has reviewed all avatlaDle input concerning the proposed Archibald Avenue Sidewalks, Phase [[; and NHEREAS, satd improvements require an Environmental Assessment; and NHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Initial Study has Deen prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quaff ty Act, as amended. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The C1ty Council of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves the Environment=aTAssessment Initial Study and issuance of a Categorical Exemption for the proposed Archibald Avenue Sidewalks, Phase II. SECTION Z: The City Clerk is directed to file a Notice of Exemption pursuan California Environmental Quality Act. ~,~_~ 89 ENVIIiONMENTAL RE`7IEW APPLICATION INITIAL STUDY - PARfi I fiE11ERAt Fcr d/i pro,l sets regu it ing envi ronmentai review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Rev1eM Cameittee through the department where the prol ect application is made. Upon race ipt of this application, the Planning Division staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study and make recommendations to Planning Co~isslon. The Planning Caeaission will make nne of three determinations: (1) The protect will have no significant environmental impact and d Negative Declaration wilt be filed, t2) The protect will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or (3) M additional information report should be supplied Dy tM applicant giving further info~+eation conterning the proposed Dro~ect. Date Filed: Pro,lect Title: Archi old Aven ~e Si dewatks phase 11 _ Applicant's Name, Address, Telephone: City of Rancho Cucamonga noon e, ~.. i : ',v ewo rvnya, bH yl%JU ~I 1V) 9tly-lUOL Name, Address, Telephone of Person TO B! Contacted Concerning this Pro,lect: Kenneth Fung Assistant Civil Engineer ~J~ ooo_tnc~ F 4 ~ZF Location of Pro~eet• Various locations on Archibald Avenue between 6th Street and-foots%~' a^~~levard (see attachment) Assessor's Porte} List other penstts necessary from local, regional, state and federal agencies aid the agency !sautnG such aermitt: ~U PROJECT pESCRSPTIOM proposed use or proposed project: Thic moo,; err ;e~n7~os the construction of 4yrvilinear sidewalks at various locations along Archibald Avenue (see attachment) Acreage oP projec4 area and square footage of existing and proposed buiidings, if any: u n Describt the env tronmental~set~tin of the project site including information on topography, so sta iTi~ plants (trees). land anlmais, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding properties, and the description of any existing structures and their use (attach necessary sheets): This oroiect is wi thin_p mix of commercial and residentia areas ~~t~oe~ nnwnhs ll from Foothill Boulevard to 6th Street. As shown on Arrar nrtwn+ t. this nro iect is divided into seven (7) segments. Segments 1,2,5 ate„ fi are on marily weed and dirt covered lengths. Some houses are located on ~, + v The rema inin Segments (3 4 b 7) are imporved and landscaped. Nn cigp;ficant cultural, historical or scenic aspects are apparent. [s the project part of a larger protect, one of a series of cumulative act tons, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact iVo ~( HILL THIS PAOJECT• VES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contourst _ x 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise of produce vibration ur glaret ~, z 3. Create a substantial change in demand far munic!p al services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)7 _ ~ 4. Create changes in the exist ing Zoning or General Plan desf gnationsi _ ~S_ 5. Remove any existing freest How many?- ,_ g 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammabies or explosivas7 _, g Exp lanaiTOn of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): 7. Estimate the amount nI era_~._ .~! ~~+,+Q •„~,t2 o'.o, is is in is proj eci will generate daiiy: 0 8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this proJect• o 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this pro,lect, in cub lc yards: 0 10. If the project involves the construction o1 residential units, complete the form on the next page. CENTIfIGTION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exh lb its present the data and information required far th i~ in iE iai eya7uat10;; tq the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be reQutred to 6e submftted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Planning Otvision. Oate: a/FiEa Signature t,.,~~ 1~ " ~ Title Assistant Civil Engineer 9 ~- RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid the school district in assessing their ability t0 accommodate the proposed residential deve lopmeni. Developers are reQufred to secure letters tram the school district for accommodating the increased number of students prior to issuance e! building perstts. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No. Specific Location of Project PHASE I PHASE 2 PNASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Numbcr of single family units: _,i e 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: _ 4. Earliest date of occupancy: _ Model/ and i of Tentative 5. 8edroams Price Range ~3 ~ r r LL O ~ BLvD. APP ro L = 300 ~~ I-l4,NIPSHIRE 4T '~ ATTACHMENT I APprv. L. = 750' pEVeN 5T ©AI=Prc. L.. I5~' peveN sT-~ I vLe~cr~ ~-! Appro. L.=845' ~ O APP'O. L•= 460 i i p,~Rdw {zouTE bus. ~ vR.~ w li 1 J !~ UI: ~~~ ~I+h sT I Q . 12iGN7-Of.W.s~Y~i I''. I' LLL___-----~~--~ON BLVD. Q ' M,4W ST c.T. r. s. F R ¢. I __ .__. ~Jpy TO StAL~ W `L, ill J d i~u N J ~~! ~L! __ A~P~IA SI• T gppro, L = 190' ~ ` LEGEND _ ~/ ~® ^ COMPLETED 7t s Q ® UNDER CONS 9~ ® NONE ~GIZQRDO CR, ' O Appro. l.. 305' ~^~,, 1~- '~1. F I~^ 0 u1 9 ~ LL m 1 a ~~ OL ~~ ~ £ .p eX V i Q ~ ~ -~'~ CITY oy aANCRO cDCAMONCA PART II - INITZAL STCDY ENVIRDNMENTAL CBECiCLIST DATE: April 5. 1988 APPLICANT: City of Rancho Cucanwnaa FILING DATE: LDC NUMBER: PROJECT: Arc hi 6a ld Avenue Sidewalks. Dhase II PROTECT LocATION: Archibald Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and 6th Street I. ENVIADNMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yu" and "saybe" aosven are required on •ctathed shesca). 1. Soils and Ceolo¢y. 47112 cha propaeal hale signlricanc results in: a. Umtab le 4round condtrlnn. n. !- ~~-_-~_- .- geologic ralationahips? b. Disruptions, diaplacemenes, compaction or burial of eha soil? e. Change Sn ccpography or ground surface eoneour inarvals? d. The deseruttion, covering or sodifleatlon of any unique geologic or physical faaturss? •. M7 pocantial increase in rind or vatar erosion of soils, of fec cing either on or off nits condlcons? f. Changes 1n erosion siltation, or deposition? B• Exposure of people or p[oDerty to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landelldaa, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? h. M ineraese in the race of axeraction and/or use of any mineral resource? 1. Hydrol~. 8111 the propoul have aignifiunt ruulta in: 9S YES MAYBE NO X -- X JL ~_ ~ _--_ -- % x _ x ?a3e 2 YES wAYBE SO a. Changes 1a currents, or the course of direction of flowing streams, rSVers, or ephemeral stream channels? _ ~ 6. Changes is sbsorp tlon races, drainage paceerns, or the race and amount of aurfacs racer xvnoff? __ ~ c. AlNrationa to the course ar flow of flood roars? _ ~ d. Change in the amount of surfue wear in any Cody of vaUrt `_ ~ •. DSacharge Snto rurface rotors, or any altaracioa of aurfac• va tar qual leq? ~ f. Altaratfoe at groundraur ebaractatletica? ~ g. Change Sn the quantity of groundvaeers, either through direct addlcioea or vith- dravala, or through intarferane• with an aqulferT Qualltyt QuancSty? __ Z h. The reduction in the amount of vans ocbar- viaa available for public wear supDllesT Y S. EanO aVT! of n nnL ~~ ~7O Y~~C~ ,,y !!C!C related hazards ouch as flooding or seichast ~ X 3. Air Ouallty. Hill eha proposal Cave •ignificans results in: a. Conscane or periodic a1r emisslona from mobile or indirect sourceat ~ Seationary aouecut ~ ~ b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and/or inurfereace with the •eeainment of applicable aie quality atandardst _- x c. Alterat Son of local or regional climatic eoodiri nn_ affatl ng •ir agvment, me latuH or 6smperaturet ~_ X 4. BS,_ ou Flora. H111 eha proposal have •ignlflcant rtaul4 in: a. Change !n ehe characteristics of speeiu, Sncl uding diversity, diatribu cion, or number of any spec lea of plants? G+6 _- ~ b. RaducRlon of the numbers of a y unique, rare or endangered spaclu o[ plantar ,. ?age 7 YES `1.1YE° ~o c. Inezodvcclon of new or dlsrupelve apeeiet of plants into an area? ,_ ~ d. Reduction in the potential for agricul[urel pzoducCion? X Fauna. 17111 the proposal have significant rasulcs Sn: a. Change in the eharacteris :ca cf opaciea, ineluding diversity, dlatribucion, or numbers of any species o[ anlmaleT __ }L, b. Rsduet ion of the numbers of any unique, rare or aadangeraG spades of animals? ,_ JS c. Introduction of nN or disruptive apeciea of animals into an area, or resole Sn a battler co the mlgratlan or movemeae of anlmalsT ~ d. Aeterioration or removal of existing fish or vildli£a habitatT X S. Pooulaefon. Will the proposal have aignif !cane rasulcs in: a. Will the proposal altar the loueion, disiri- bution, density, dlvrrsity, or growth rata of the human populatioa of an arse? v b. Will ehe proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for addicionQ how ingT ~ 6. Socio-Economic Fac[ora. pill Che proposal have aigniiicant rasulcs Sn: a. Change in local or regional socio-ecoaomie charaetarlaeies, laeludieg economic of co®areiel diversity, tax rate, and property VelWaT ~ ~ % 6. pill proleet coau be equitably die trlbuud among pro~ecc banaflciaries, S.a., boyars, tax payers or proleet 4eareT ~ __ _ 7, fond Use and Planning Considerations. Will the proposal have signif Sean[ results Sn? a. A subttanclal slurs [ion of the Pteunt or planned land use of an araaT _ _ x b. A conflict with any dasignac ions, obyactives, policlea, or adopted plane o[ any goveinmencal en[itiu? ~ ~7 ~ ~ ~ c. An impact upon the quL Sty or gwnt Sty o[ existing conaumptlva or non-consumptive tec[eaclanal oppo rtunitluT Page ~ YES WAY9° v0 8, iranaoortation. Hill the proposal have aignif Scan[ results in: a. Ceneraclon of aubscantlal addiclonal vahiculer movemeac? -. ~~ Y b. Effseu on existing atresta, oz demand for nev street construction? ~. Effects on existing parking faeilicies, or demaad for nev parkinj? __ ~ d. Subetanclal impact upon axiscing eranaporta- tioa gecasa? Y •. Alterations to praaane patcaroa of eireula- tlon or awvessae of people and/or joodat ._ ~ f. Alterations to or effects on present and potential voter-borne, rail, twa transie or air erattle? x. j. Incrsasu in [nffic hasards to ~oeor vehicles, bicyelfau or pedsserianst ~~ Y 9. Cultural 1lssaureea. Hill the proposal have •ijniflcane results ia: •. Adis eurbanee to the ineserlrv nt ,.~t.,...t.....,,t paleontological, and/or hie torlcal resources? • •~ -~. Y 10. Health. gafe[v and Nuisance yactors. NSll the proposal have significant resoles la: •. Creation of any hulih hazard or poemtial health hazard? -~ Y b. Exposure of people co potential health hazards? ~_ .L e. A risk of axploe ion or release of hazardous substaacu Sn the awn[ of an accidanct d. M increase in the nusber of individuals er ~p~claa aY vector qr pethe-.oj~aic orjanisss or the exposure of paopi.a co such organlasat ___ x •. Ineraau !n axlatlnj noise lawls? _~ x f. Exposure of people to pocanclally dangerous noiu lewlst _ _~ x j. The creation o[ ob~eccionabl• odors? - __ z h. M incruu Sn light or jLre7 x g pa;e 5 YES `"AYEE VO 11. Aesthetics. ASll the proposal have eigniflcant resoles in: a. 'fha obs eruecion or degradation of any scenic vista or viev? JL b. I'he creation of as ta~thatically offensive site? _ x e. A conflict with eha o63 ece1va of daeigaaced or potutlal acetic corridor? _- .~ 12. Uttlitiea and Public Servleu. Will CM~propoeal have a signlflcant need for nN ayatasn, or alterations to the follwiag: a. !lent ric paver? ~e Y b. Fatural or packaged gut C• COOOUPSCatienm ayataYt ~L. d. N~car supplyi . - _. ~ e. ttaataacar fae111tio? -.~ x- f. Flood control atruccurut x g. Solid vuu fac171r1•a ~. ~ x h. Flre protection? _~ .Y i. Police protattlont --_ JL ~. Schools? - -~~ ~ k. Parka or otMr reecutioul taeilitiut 1. Nalntananea of public facilitlaa, Sncluding roads and flood control faef11t1aa2 ~_ Ji ^. Other govarnuntal aarvicut __ 1L 13. Energy and Scarr• 9..~..«.- have aignif icanc results in: ~~~~ `ae propoaai a, Uaa of wbatan clal or a:casslva foal or energy? -- JL b. Subs uncial increua in daund upon aalacing aoureu of energy? - ~ c. M lncreasa !n rho daund for development of rev source of anargy? ~~ d. M lncreasa or parpacwtlon of the conaumpclon of non-r anwable forms of anargy, when teaacble ranevable source of anargy era availablat ?age 5 YES waYSE YO e. Substantial deDletlon of any nonrenerabla or scarce natural resource? _- r 14. Nandatorv Pindinaa of Sitnifieance. a. Does the pro]set have the potential Co degrade the gwliry of the etnrironmmc, lubatancially reduce the habiiac of fish or wildlife apaeiu, caws • f1sA or rildlite population io drop below salt mataining lwala, ehrutan to eliminate a plant or animal cevunity, seduce the nusbar or raacsiot the range of • rare or andanprad place or animal or alisinate Important examples of the as]or parloda of California hLCOry os DrehiatoryT ~ _~ .Y.- b. Doo the prof at[ have the pountial co aehiaw short-tars, eo the disadvanuga of long-cerw, environmental goalaT (A short-test Sspaet m eha amirotaant L one which occurs lm a talatiraly brlet, definitive period of time rASla Zoeg- tats ispacta rill andurl wall into the futusa). _ ~_ ~ e. Doan the pro]enc have ispaeta v61eh are individually limited, but cumulatlvaly Lanl3darablaT (Cumulatively cowidarabla muse chat eha inerareeal attaetl of en individual pro]ace aza coaaidarabla rhea viavrd 1n ~m,.......X . ~~~ ~„~ ~i~acu ai pelt pr0]atta, sod probrbla futuN pro]act/). ~ d. Does the pro]ecc hews mvironmantal afLeta which v111 cause eubatantlal adverse atfac ca on human baiaga, alehar directly er 1edlreetly? ~ ~ ~ II. 7ISCUSSZON OP ITIpIEON!$!1'IAL 6VALVA7ION (i.e., of aftltmativa answers to the sbow qua/eiona plus a discuuion of propolad mitigation maasurea). >Dv ?age i III. DETERYlNATION On the 6sais of this iaicial avalwcion: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have • significant effect XX oa cbe ewiromaenc, sad s CATEGORICAL EXEMPTI OA Ni.li be prepared. I find that although the proposed prof ece could have • significant j ~ effect oa the saviroraant, there will not ba a significant effect L-~ in chic cue bacawa the adtigaeioo waaurea dueribsd on so attached ehnc Sava beta added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION DILL RE PREPARED- ^ L find chs proposed projat MAY have a tigaifieaac affect on the eaviraauec, ud as ENVIRONl4N2 LMPACT REPORT ie required. Dau 4/5/88 /LJ~v~n~7 ~~ gigaacur~ Assistant Civil Engineer 'rifle o~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: April 20, 1988 :: To: City Council and City Manager from: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer i By: Bohn L. Martin, Associate Civil Engineer ~ Sub,)ect: Base Line road Widening, Phase II between Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Park Lane - Right-of-May Acquisition for Williams property, 12196 Base Line Road RECOMIEM9YITION• Recommend approval to open escrow with Lawrence and Lorraine Williams for purchase of house and sand at 12796 Base Line Road to remove the house from the path of the Base Line Road Widening Protect between Ettwanda Avenue and Victoria Park Lane for 594,000.00 plus escrow casts of 55,000.00 to be paid from Systems Fees Account No. 22-4637-8731. Mr. Russell Maguire, City Engineer and John Martin of the Engineering Design Staff met with Mr. and Mrs. Williams to discuss the forthcoming City pro$ect to widen Base Line Rord between Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Park Lane. The present configuration of the right-of-wdy projection ••--.- -- p• -~~. •~..n. .~..,.y ~+,+,v „u.i v, ,Amn IolUC114! Ol AL/A Base Line Road. They both were well aware of the impending undesirable situation of having a ma,~or divided street at their door step. The additional concern was that if they were willing to stay and dedicate the necessary street right-of-wqy, the remaining portion of their property would not comply with minimum standards for a single family residential lot. It was mutually agreed that the City would purchase their property (land and lmprovaents) fora purchase price based on an appraisal prepared by an independent appraisal consultant along with agreeable relocation costs. The mutually acceptable result is the above recommendation plus the City absorbing nornial closing costs. Respec f y ubmitted, n RNM;F~-yA~~~L~ boa - CITY OF' RANCHO CCCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda "Deck, Engineering Technician +? . SUBJECT: Approval of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for OR 86-43, located on the northeast corner of Eighth Street and Baker Avenue, submitted by NTI Construction Incorporated RECOMMEMBATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the sub,iect agreements and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND DR 86-43, located on the northeast corner of Eighth street and Baker Avenue, in the General Industrial Development DTstrict, was approved by the Planning Commission on May 13, 1987. ine ueveioper, n u Construction incorporated, is submitting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement to guarantee undergrounding of existing overhead utilities on the opposite side of Baker Avenue and in the AT & SF Railroad right-of-way and an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: E226,000 Labor and Material Bond: E113,G00 Copies oY the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga County Water District. Resp f rfi1 , ubmi tted, r ~--~-- R M:LB:s Attachments ~~ RESOLUTION N0. ~ a'd~ g A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM HTI CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME kHEREAS, the ^ity Council of the City of Rancho C~camanga adopted Ordinance No. 5B on February 21, 1979, to establish requirements for construction of public improvements in conjunction with building permit issuance; and NHEREAS, undergrounding of existing overhead utilities established as prerequisite to issuance of building permit for DR 86-43 has been met by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by HTI Construction IncorDOrated. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lten Agreement, authorizes the Mayer and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record sane in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardirro County, California. r ~~~ /OAF RESOLUTION N0. O ~ J ~ ~ l A RESOLOTI ON GF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECIIRITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW N0. 86-43 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, californt a, haS fnr its consideratT a.^. an L^.IproYat:e.^.t Agree^~ent executed o^ April 5, 1988, by HTI Construction Incorporated as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adi acent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the northeast corner of Eighth Street and Baker Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and sub,lect to the terms thereof, is to be done in con,iunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, Development Review No. 86-43; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ~--~ ~' ~p5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tats:- oR 86-43 I+aiGYNEERING DMBION EXID$1T; N ~o~ iC/iirr~y y~e - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager ~~~.JJ7 FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer i By: Linda Bmk, E.^.gineer!ng TecM!ciar. ~~ SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Foothill Boulevard Master Planned Storm Drain No. 1, located on Foothill Boulevard, between Oeer Creek Channel and Haven ~ Avenue, submitted by Lewis Homes of California RECOMIEMDATION It is recoemended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALTSIS/BACKGROUND Lewis Homes of California is submitting an agreement and security for the construction of Foothill Boulevard Master Planned Storm Drain No. 1, located on Foothill Boulevard, between Deer Creek Channel and Haven Avenue, y, im w ue~civyn,cni. ei Liic eJjewnL y,uyw i.,r. Ti,e >m.uri yr >uim,i vi.eu i> in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: 5399,000 Labor and Material Bond: 5199,500 Copies of the agreement and security are available 1n the City Clerk's Office. Res 1 fitted, r E""`--yam :LBad~ Attachments ~6'7 RESOLUTION N0. $ D ~'~ O A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR FOOTHILL BOULEVARD MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN N0. 1 IdHEREAS the City Caunc -vf tilE amity Of RdnChv ~OCaTlOngd, California, has far its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on March 30, 1980, by Lewis Homes of California as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on Foothill Boulevard, between Deer Creek Channel and Haven Avenue; and NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property adjacent tc said storm drain; and WHEREAS, said Improvenent Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOM, THEREFORE, BE iT RESOLVED by 4he City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of nau~nv bud. GUWU1j a, allu U10 VILy bICrA LU aLLeOt LilereLV. ~-~-t~ toy okOJ l{7 BOJNDFRI ES a -` ~ V N crrY o~ rc~e: R~iNCHO CUCAMONGA 1'l77.E: MASTER PLANNEp STDRt1 RAIN NUMBER 1 ENGWEERII~iG DIVL9ION ~1T' ~D~ CITY OF RANCHO Cl'CAbIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Llilda Deek, Cng~nCCr ing 10C11n lla an ,,, p,. SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 13275, located on the north side of Highland Avenue, 1,200 feet east of Haven Avenue, and Release of Improvement Agreement and Security (Certificate of Deposit) approved by Council on February 3, 1988, submitted by Oxford Development Corporation RECONENd1TI0N: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the agreement and security dated March 29, 1988, and releasing the agreement and security accepted by Council on February 3, 1988, and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the new agreement and release the previously accented agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Iracc isuo, locates on the norm Sloe of Hignlana Avenue, t,zw feet east of Haven Avenue, in the Medium High Residential Development District, was approved by the City Council on February 3, 1988. The developer, Oxford Development Corporation, is submitting an agreement and security (bonds) to replace Lhe agreement and security (Time Certificate of Deposit) accepted by Council nn February 3, 1988. The amount of the bonds has not changed and remains as follows: Faithful Performance Bond: 552,000 Labor and Material Bond: 526,000 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Res 1 s bmitted, e RH B:sd - Attac men P/v RESOLUTION N0. (~p - ac~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGq, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TAACT N0. 13275 AND RELEASING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND SECURITY (TIMED CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT) RPPROVED ON FEBRUARY 3, 1988 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on March 29, 1988, by Oxford Development Corporation as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adJacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the north side of Highland Avenue, 1,200 feet east of Haven avenue; and NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subJect to the terms thereof, is to be done in con,i unction with the devetopment of said real property as referred to Tract No. 13215; and NHEREAS, Bald Improvement agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement; and WHEREAS, said agreement and security replace the agreement and security approved by City CountTl on february 3, 1988, niri~, 7nnrce~uwc, at ll Rtwtvtu oy Lne C7Ly Geunttl of LNe City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign 5=1d Improvement Agreement an behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto, and to cause the agreement and security approved on february 3, 1988, to be released. ~-.--~ l,( ~~~ 9 ' ~ ~ ....~ t - ~--- R ~;_---= '_ 1l~ iii ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ' R ' I ~,__~.~' ', ~ 4 ` ~ ;~ ~\~. '. \ \. ~ ~' ~p 1 ~`'~ tC` il~ --- ~ i~ ~ ; I ~ '31:~'r:. ~ ~~ S _ ~a Gj',\~, ~~1~ 5~ i F- ~ -' `- , j 1 i' ~~ ~ ----- - gar ~ ~~ ~- "'`~ J~ ~`~ _~ __ Diu`' .`• ~ - ..:.. CITY OF RANCHO CUC.AMONGA ENGIIPEERIIIi4 DIVIBIGN ;_ _._ •• n 1Talt: Ta. fi /~z ~S 17Z7.~ F7~8TP: I~~ - ----- CITY OF RANCHO Ct'CAyONGA STAFF REPORT ~ ~~,~~ ~ GATE: April 20, 1986 ~.L T0: City Council and City Manager ~~""CC.. ii I PROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer fiV: linda Raa_k, Fng innoring To rho i,r:an SU BdECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 13425, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, between Nineteenth Street and Highland Avenue, submitted by Glenfed Development I~ RECOMffNDATI011 It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract 13425, accepting the sub,j ect agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Tract is425, located on the east sf de of Haven Rvenue, between Nineteenth Street and Highland Avenue, in the Low Medium Residential Development Df strict, was approved by the Planning Commission on December 10, 1985, for 41.n A:~.,~:nn ..G 1C A7 .. 71 The Developer, Glenfed Development, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements ir, the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: E623,000 Labor and Material Bond; E311,500 Monumentation E 5,90U Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. ati r[_ nt ann v'mui aVp ryppn mrl from •Mn hinF nFnM ..d nL.nnn, .~.. _. _nn. ..-. .._._ ___.. nano:, .~.,. ... y,. 5...,..,.. a.... ~~oncn w,~ school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. Rasp 1'y ubmitted, ~~RH B:sd Attachment it 3 RESOLUTtON Ntl. 8 p ` ~o` A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROYEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, RNO FINAL M4P OF TRACT N0. 13425 MHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 13425, ronsist ing of 71 lots, submitted by Glenfed Development, Subdivider, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, between Nineteenth Street and Highland Avenue, has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider for approval by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and MHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets Aelineated thereon. NOM, THEREFORE, BE [T RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same fs approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approvai as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. '' Y i I~ - I _. m W 7 I a a x: 3 3A O C HI Gk{IAND AV^cN[IE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVL9ION A~N' ~py TRACT 13425 // S ERHIBI'h - --- CITY OF RANCHO CQCAMONGA STAFF REPORT r - DATE: April 20, 1988 , T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Yichazl C. Lang, ;eniur Public ii0rki inspector SUBJECT: Award the Archibald Avenue Entry Monuments Improvement Project located at Archibald Rvenue at 4th Street, to Bopark Enterprises, Incorporated, for the amount of ~ 5129,246.00, to be funded from. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Account No. 40-4130-8767 RECOMlIEIIDIITION: [t is recommended that the City Council accept all bids as submitted and award the contract for the Archibald Avenue Entry Monuments Improvement Project to the lowest responsible bidder, Bopark Enterprises, Incorporated, for the amount of 5129,246.00. Background/Analysis ier previous i.ouncti action, Dias were so nctcea, recetveo ana openea on April 6, 1988 for the subject project. Bopark Enterprises, Incorporated, is the apparent lowest responsible bidder with a bid amount of E8129. 246.00 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was $123,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. St aft has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Respe u ubmi*ted, e ~/,, RH L:d1~-J'~~~ Attachment cc: Purchasing ~~~ .~ 8 b ~ U N L m J m m O~ p G t H O ~ p~ ~ O_ `v 1 i Q l ~ 6 V W Q ~ C N ~ ~ m J ` G H p O (6 ~ T w ~ s ° ~ ~ _ ~ ~ y ~ m Q G'1 WL O O 6 M VI _ O g L F ~ ° ~ o o ~ ~ ~ Q Q 2 .. w ~ g o € ~ ~ a m .- e m W N (D O w m u a s g s 8 T J H Q a P C GC qr VY .+v'~ ~S~ i0 J 'J C 9 y!C O p 'J q9 ~ ~ a~ ~NFN 8 ~1 8 8 A s ~i a 8 '~ 8 nNI N NN O 0 s // 7 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager fROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 8Y: Michael D. !o.^.g, Sr. Public korks :n5pector .l I SUBJECT: Authorize the advertisf ng of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Victoria Street Rehabilitation and Drainage Pro,iect, Located hetween Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue, to be funded from Gas Tax 2107, Account No. 09-4637-8701 RECOMMENd1TI0N: It is recommended that City Council approve plans and Specifications for the Victoria Street Rehabilitation and Drainage Drolect, located between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertfse the 'Notice Inviting Bids." Background/Analysts The subJect project plans and specifications have been completed and reviewed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's ^`".ac3:c `- --~- - - i> E1,V,C~.v. w. !eyai auvercising is scneau led for April ~25yVand~~Mayv 2, 1488, with the bid opening at 2:30 P.M., May 6, 1988. Resp sVbmitted, ~ ~ RHM: Attachment cc: Purchasing /ig RESOLUTION N0. ~~ - ~a3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RPPROV ING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "VICTORIA STREET IMPROVEMENTS", IN SAID CITY ANO AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE i0 RECEIVE BIDS. WHrprec a `.5 ihn ie~t: 0.^. ,.f the City ^f Pd.^. LFO C;:C 3T~0^^yL t0 C..^`.trUCt certain improvements in,the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and spcif ications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 6e and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Victoria Street improvements". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed 61ds or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this rwtice, NOTICE IS HEREBY Gi.i.ii tirot ~ c aai~ vity vi non ~irv ~u~mr~uya niii receive aL Liie uPi ire ui Lire C itv Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:30 o'clock P.M. on the 6th day of May, 1988, sealed bids or proposals for the "Victoria Street Improvements" in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a farm provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid fur Construction of Victoria Street Improvements". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general Drevailinq_ r. '° `par d'vn wages far pork of 9 Siiiri idr ChardCLer' iri Lire iucaiiiy in whichVthe public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of Der diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on fife in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. ~~ RESOLUTION PAGE 2 The Contractor shall forfeit, as pensalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollare (E25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general Drev ailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1177.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may he employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777,5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apDrenticeable occupation to apply to the Joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works protect and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to Journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to Journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the Joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent ir. the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or 0. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered appentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. Thr f.nntrartnr i< regpirad to m3 ke td~tr'.bUtt~ne 4n iJnde nef abllshnA Fen the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site arr. making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. ~~8 RESOLUTION PAGE 3 Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any ~~•bcontrsctor under his. shop, cr~;,ply with and hz govzrnzd by the lass of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (f25. 00) fur each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8} hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence Day to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are deffned in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10X) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee L6nL Lice oiduer viii ewer into Lim yroyosed can tract it cne same is awardea to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the Lity of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shalt be appl~i ed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100X) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (50X) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or suDDlies furnished for the oerformance of the 'work contracted tv be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contrctor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. ~~~ RESOLUTION PAGE 4 No proposal will be considered fran a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class "A" license (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time time this contract is awa..loA The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of f35.00 sa?d (35.00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of 515.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The sutcessful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Sect ton 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute uV Ulw ItCU pCbVl ILIC] III IICU VI IIN/IIC] 1II NIIIC IU I~ICIIUI IIICIRC tCLC11LIU11/. The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reJect any ar,d all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this day of 19_ PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the Cf ty of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this day of 19 ATTEST: Ity er ~~~ ---- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAyONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager I FROM: Rur eil M. Maguire, City Engineer 8Y: Peter Tune, Ada in i; ratite Analyst SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the City Corporation Yard Phase I Prof ect, located at 9153 Ninth Street, Rancho Cucamonga, to be funded from Capital ~, Reserve - Account No. 25-4285-7043 I RECOMENpITION: It is recommended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the City Corporation Yard Phase I Droject, located at 9153 Ninth Street and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Cierk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." Background/Analysis The subject protect plans and specifications have been completed by Pitass i-Dalmau Architects, reviewed by staff and approved by the City cnyinen. Iiie tnylneel"S ClL Vila ie Tur GUnS GrUCLIen i5 >[,WV, WV. W. Legal advertising is scheduled for April 27, 1988 and May 4, 1988 with the bid opening at 2:00 P. M., May 19, 1988. Respe ybmitted, ~ ~~~ t ' ~ / "'- i R :PT:dlw Attachment cc: Purchasing ~~3 RESOLUTION N0. p O ~4~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "CITY CORPORATION YARD PROJECT PHASE I" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. WH E.°,EA~ ?t :5 LhE ^t£^Li 0^ .•s the City ,.c Pa.^.:h0 CUL3°..nga t0 ,.....St:'uCt certain improvements in~the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and spc if icat ions presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "City Corporation Yard Project Phase I". BE IT FURTHER RESDLYED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INV[T [NG SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant tc a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS_ HEREBY U1YG1, LIIUL LIIC ~OIU LIL,y VI If UIIL IIV I.U LNIIVII IJU 11111 ICLCIYC GL LIIC UII ILC VI LIIC City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M, on the 19th day of May 1988, sealed bids or propos ais for the "City Corporation Yard Project Phase I" in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91130. Bids must be made on a form proof ded for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of City Corporation Yard Protect Phase I". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing r atc of pci dieril wagei i6r work of a iimiidr Char fitter iri the iocaliiy In which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California I is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as ppensalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollare (f25.00) for each laborer, workman, or ^achanic e-ployed far each calandar day a- porticr therzof, suc` taborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, property Indentured aDDrenti ces may be employed in the prosecution of the work. P.ttention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1771,6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employfng tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of uyyi en a Lee w ~umne,puai waL wiii ue Loeu rn uie perrurmance ur cne contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the nunber o` apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through aDPrenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or ~. When the Cmit rdC Lur pruvi des evidence that he employs registered appent ices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. /~S The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or Journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1117,5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and -thzr rzquir~zrts Tay be obtai red fraT the Director of indu striai Relations, ez-officio the AAninistrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, ar from the Division of ADPrenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workman employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ({25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8f hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are aer inea in the app n caoie collect ive oargaim ng agreements rtlea in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10X) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Ranchu Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if anv. shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100X) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent ~~~ (50%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to 6e done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contrctor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor wham a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time time this contract is awarded. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of 570.00, said 570.00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonrei~ursable payment of 525.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expanse, subst ;cute authorized securities in lieu of monfes withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. ~~.~ ~~ /~~ --- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: T0: FROM: Uy: SUBd ECT: April 20, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Michael 0. Long, Sr. Public works Inspector •rr,~ Authorfze the advertising of the "NOtite Inviting Bids" for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Highland Avenue at Etiwanda Avenue Improvement Project, to be funded with TDA Article 8 funds, 4tcount No. 12-4637-8707 RECOMMEIIiMTiON: It is recomgended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Highland Avenue at Etiwanda Avenue Improvement project and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." Background!,gnalysis The subject project plans and specifications have been completed by Lawrence 5. Eisenhart, Consulting Engineer, reviewed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction is 581,000.00. Legal advertising is scheduled for April 25 and May 2, 1988, with the bid opening at 2:00 P.M., May 10, 1988. /Resp fu submitted, 1 / ~•~' 1 RH . Attachment cc: Purchasing ~~ 8 RESOLUTION NO. 0 S ~~ aJ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING .AT HIGHLAND AVENUE AT ET [WANDA AVENUE", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and spc if ications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Highland Avenue at Etiwanda Avenue". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the wcrk specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" ruro uanc w a nesuiucion ur cite i.uuncii or cite i.i ~y ur nanciio i.ucanunya, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 10th day of May, 1988, sealed bids or proposals for the "Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Hf ghland Avenue at Etiwanda Avenue" in said Cfty. Bids will be opened and publicly read inmediate ly in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Hf ghland Rvenue at Etiwanda Avenue". Pi L~YAILIHG WAGE: N^tice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the r~~ RESOLUTION PAGE 2 office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Lirie Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as pensalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollare (E25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less tnan the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, proper ly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeab le occupation to apply to the Joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of aoprentices to .iournevmen that will be used in the oerfnrmance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to Journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the Joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or 0 WMn Lh .._.r _ ~.__ - E ~~~ a..ior prv'r Baca 'c'ridciitc that h'c nTwi3Y5 rcuiiLered appentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. the Contractor is required to make contributions to funds establfshed for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or Journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are makfng such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777,5 and 1711.6 in the employment of apprentices. /3~ RESOLUTION PAGE 3 information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-cif icio the AAninistrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any -"era :or uP.dcr hint ihail cubp iy with dnd be yJYerneu by titB laNS Jf fire State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (E25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (Bj hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8, The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10X) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee to ac the oicaer will enter tnto cne proposee contract tt the same is awaraee to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contr acY to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder, The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall he one hundred percent (100X) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (50X) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or suoolies furni;bed for tha oarfnrmanra of tha work contracted to be done by the contractor, or any worK or IaDOr of any kind done thereon, and the Contrctor will also 6e required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. /3/ RESOLUTION PAGE 4 No proposal will 6e considered from a Contractor wham a proposal farm has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7D00 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the tfine time this contract is awarded. The work is to 6e done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of f30.00, said 530.00 is rwnrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied 6y payment stipulated above, together with an additionai nonreimbursable payment of 515.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reJect any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this day of 19 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this Cay of 19 ATTEST: Cit~.`Terc~- /~~ --- CITI' OF RANGHb CtiCANONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1988 I T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Michael D. Long, Sr. Public Norks insoectnr /y7%~ ~~I SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Highland Rvenue at MTlliken Avenue Improvement Pro,lect, to be funded from TDA Article 8 funds, Account No. 12-4637-8108 I RECOMMENBATIpI: [t is recommended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the Traffic Signals and Safety LTghting at Highland Avenue at Milliken Avenue Improvement pra~ect and aDProve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." Background/Analysis The sub,Iect protect plans and specifications have been completed by Lawrence S. Eisenhart, Consulting Engineer, reviewed by staff and dpPrOVed bV Lhe f.{tv Fnni near Tho_ c.,~+., _...~~ -- - evua li uu Llun is 585,000.00. Legal advertising is scheduled-for Apri lV~25 and May 2, 1988, with the bid opening at 2:30 P.M., May 10, 1988. Respectfull bmi*.ted, ~ ~ r ,% ~/~~~ 1~ RHM: Attachment cc; Purchasing l33 RESOLUTION N0. 0 V ~~S` A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT HI GHLANO AVENUE AT MILLI KEN AVENUE" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THF. CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucanronga to consxruct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of r_ert ain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and spc if ications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 6e and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Highland Rven ue at Milliken Avenue". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, Lo wit: "NOTICE IN V1ilNG SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Sdn BernarAinn r...i~r~. Ce':f_-;~,; ~c~Liuy i,iiis noL ice, NUIICE IS HERE RY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2;30 o'clock P.M. on the 10th day of May, 1988, sealed bids or proposals for the "Traffic Signals and Safety lighting at Highland Avenue at Milliken Avenue" in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read imnedi ate ly in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of Traffic Signa is and Safety Lighting at Highland Avenue at Milliken Avenue". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordanrc_ with the pro of %aiiinrnia _abnr Dnd2 DiViSiu,i G, Pdrt %, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and•2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the /3~ RESOLUTION PAGE 2 office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. the Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as pens alty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollare (E25.00) .for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or nortio.^. thereof, -f ;uch laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated far any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1177.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1177.5 and 1777,6 of the Labor Cade concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1717.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the jeirt± aRprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. 'fhe certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices t0 iournavmen rbat U+±± ~~ .~--~ ,~ (~~~ peri urmance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen fn such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio ^.f one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis Statewide or locally, or n I,[hcn the ~OritraCtnr prnvidn< ov+denCc that h2 employs registered appentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade an such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. ~S RESOLUTION PAGE 3 The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1771.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may he obtained from the Director of Industria) Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. tight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a iegal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 1, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (325.00) fur each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (85 hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed ±o execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payme.^,is are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder moor anhm:r y+.~ ~;; r, ;,rvSu~ ,.a~L, ~usiiier•s cnecK, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10X) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property cf the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's securfty shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the hood to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100X1 of the rnn,rracr pr iCB ihercof aiid ari ndditinn,ai bnn,d ^ umuJiit equal to rif ty percent (50X} of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contrctor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may he entered into between hfm and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said Work. RESOLUTION PAGE 4 No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a Droposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (Genera) Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Cal ifornfa Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time time this contract is awarded. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the Dlans and specifications will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of 530.00, said 530.00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accampanled by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of 515.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead, The successful bidder will 6e required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General F:evisfons, as szt forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to 6e done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized ccnir: }:o~ +~ ~+~_ cf ,-_,,," ..~.h~~s id (pe~ivrmantx recent ton). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this ` day of 19_ PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this , day of 19 Mayor ATTEST: tty er / 37 ----- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Michael n, Lnng, ge.,::. oeylic Ncrk; Inspector ~ SUBJECT: Authorf ze the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Slurry Seal Program, Phase II, Fiscal Year 1987-88 Improvement Project, located in Districts 1, 2 and 3 and Alternates A and B (see attached maps) and to be funded from SB 300 funds - Account No. 15-4637-8050 i RECOlifENC11iI0N: It is recommended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the "Slurry Seal Program, Phase II, Fiscal Year 87/88 Improvement project and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting 8fds." BACk6R0UND/ANALYSIS The subJect project plans and specifications have been completed and rGVi"W".I tip. e~~ti ..J estimate for construction ris 568,500.00. ~Legal~advertisfngnisischeduled for April 25 and May 2, 1988 with the bid opening at 10;30 a. m., Friday, May 6, 1988. Respec submitted, ri ~~---~ r RH Attachment cc: Purchasing ~ 3 ~" RESOLUTION N0. p O 'o~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPEC[FI CATIONS FOR THE "SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM, PHASE II, FISCAL YEAR 1981-80", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. WHEREAS; it i< the ;"r gnrapn c' the amity of Ra.u`N Cue maunga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and spcif ications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Slurry Seal Program, Phase II, Fiscal Year 1987-80". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is i;ereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals far doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisanent shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonya, San Bernardino County, California, directing this ratice, NOTICE IS HEREBY C n¢u •,..,. «_ City Clerk in the~officesVof"the~City~ofuRancho~Cucamonga,aontor before thethe hour of 10:30 o'clock A.M. on the 6th day of May 1988, sealed bids or proposals for the "Slurry Seal Program, Phase II, Fiscal Year 1987-88" in said City. Bids wilt be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to Che City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of Slurry Seal Program, Phase 1[, Fiscal Year 1987-88". PREYAILING WAGE; Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of Cal iform a Labor Code, Division 2, Fart 7, Chapter 1, ?r*_icles 1 anA - inn r,."._,,..,,_ . -~~- ' - required Lu pay not iess than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in •which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regarA, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the /3y' office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9326 Base line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as ensalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-f the dollare !t_25.Q0~ for e'^h labcrEr, ~crkalan, a. mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. [n accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1771.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship canmittee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apDrentices_hip program in that trade for a ~o.r:v: ate „s ., .~_ ~ ~~ tc wi it a~OU PIA Llle I'aL 10 OT apprentices to journeymen that~will<6e~used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least I/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered appentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. ~ y~ The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1177.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the hivicinn nF n p.e ~:~o b:p t d -dam ^d - . ..p n_. _..5... $ Ln L. d.. i~o brae ch off 'ices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of C, al ifornia as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him ar any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8j hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payahle to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second '.owest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. the amount of the bond to be given to Secure a faithful oerfnrmanre ~f rwo rnntraCt fCr ""d WCrk 'ha'y ` _ __ _. _.._ ~~ ~e uiie hundred percent (i00X) of the contract price thereof,~and an additional band in an amount equal to fifty percent (50X) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or tabor of any kind done thereon, and the Contrctor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. /~l Ro proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seg.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the *.in;e time this can tract i; awarded. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications will 6e furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of 530.00, said (311.00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of 515.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. in accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifitattons regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~5 avte wnL gnu CApCn)e, SUUSC1LULe authorized securities in lieu ofVmontesFwithheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to re,lect any and all bids. dy order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this ~ day of . 19 PASSED ARD ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this _ day of 19 -r.-- nayur ATTEST: y er / ~~ ~~ I ~~ ~ S ii^~.D c'1~ Ave wrrLn 5~ e ~- s; ~ s v ~ r.o D/ Tq rlaa mtt o o E .. wa oa" t ` Q ^P~ _ ~ MoT41 ~. 'CT A. fi ?~ a t C o afar _ 3 yQa' cl y wla MO`x c m v.fr 1 / O .~ o Cmlito,~ ?>t+~ ~" St ~• La Vln c ~rla~ G0) St 3 L GYanC mAe SI > `om~l,l pr. ~ Lomlla m" S <' / E Mov Dr _ AlU EEEM. M M.I. i i .,.~. ., ++~ = Hoad r'~ lj •n«pa,e clru Q Wi~~rl ° t IIO,A SI. _t0 ~ C hN ~u~ ~1'/Y 1 9 q~ T iD. ,i ~~^Eauaa" ~ m v "CY.lE`SCR:~FI Eu.au z2 4f _°.Iw ~ °F ~•. 1 ~ Ic ii p S SGN.(~ ~ JI Ealdga ~~ c " ,a E S ~'D_.~._IFQIIIHILLEI~i~~n~ ~ BLVO ,nrrn U SLURRY SEAL PHASE II N 198T~88 /~{ ~ VICINITY 8r INDEX MAP / ST GALq AVE• 3 3' 2 , 1 ~ ~ W H M/ETON W J 2 $ ~ ~ W ~ 2 R W W W / NO ETTE /NON T T ~ J ST ST• y R 2 Q HOL ~ HOL ST• ~ ~ Q d V V/CT R/ Q S ~"~ Q? 2 O r~ T y" Q W ~ y • O • ~ W W ~ ~ tr ~ ~~L~ v' '~ Q /~ ~~_ F r ~T~~ G STREET ~ - - - -s-P DI -R -- - - ~ - - ~ STRICT NO I LEGENO SLURRY SEAL FIRE HYDRANT • APPROXIMATE ATiON F R PA H °~~~Int~ CITYOFRANCIIO CUCQt~~VI" NTS TITLE !I ' ~ '~'-'~~~ - SLURRY SEAL PHASE II l `I '~~ is SITE MAP ~W ~~ I~J07-Ci2 ~~~ L J CHURCH STREET • a L.wcsrow sr• ,~ tl ~ H ti W ~ W J W Z •HEMLACK • STREET ~ Z W n ~ y W ~ • ~ Q Q ~ a a x 24• 33~U 1. O ~ TRY ~ TR T 2 M > ~ Q • _ m J Z ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ i V ~ v Q • • U ~ ~ SAN BERNARD/NO ROAD DOSTRIDT NO.2 ~ LE~E~:~ U FIRE HYDRANT ~~ SLURRY SEAL • APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF R 9 R PATCHING o°~ ~,~~0~' CITYOFRANCHOCUCIWON6A NTS TITLE _ „L~^~ 1; _ SLURRY SEAL PHASE II SITE MAP n ~ ~ 1987-88 /4'~ N L J /9 TN STREEt W ~ ; 4{~ 24 Z W t iy ti a ~ R y a W Z h ~ ~ ti 2 d W 3 R C m Y ~ ~ H ~ ~ ~ o Q MONTE V/S•TA •SrREET ~ Q ~ ~ (~ --~ ~ if ~! !~ ti ca v/NE srREEr ~ ~~ V DISTRICT Np• 3 V LEGEND y s~ j ~~~ SLunnr SEAL, ` (f FIRE HYDRANT ~ APPRQXIMATE LOCATION OF R 8 R PATCHING ~.o" °^r, CI TY Of~ RANCHO CU NA ''''`' - SLURRY SEAL PHASE II >~ ~~ s -' ~ Z 1987 - 8 8 ~ ~~ -- TITLE TE M J v Z 0 Q ALTERNATE A L^EGEND `~ SLURRY SEAL tl FIRF NYf1pA NT • APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF R 9 R PATCHING L W a N O W 2 r ~`P~y,..,^o,~'~ C~ ~ T OFRANC~#O~II~II n~ TITLE n SLURRY SEAL PHASE II $iTE AIAF ~~-"~'~ 1987 - 88 /~/7 N 19., u uuu MQNTE VISTA STREET ~ ~ I... w w W ~ ~~ rr~ > a ~ 3 c~ CIELI = rc ~ ~ ~ m a ~ ~ ST. tl a ~ ~ uo a = O LA VINE STREET ~ ~ ~ b Q Q W S - ._ - _ -3-P -R -R- - - - - - ALTERNATE 8 LEGEND ® SLURRY SEAL tl FIRE HYDRANT l • APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF R 8 R PATCHING ~~~~ei~,, C~~ I~R/7wd7Y N S ~c~-~~c ~ TITLE "%`Mt- ~~ SLURRY SEAL PHASE I) giT~ ~! ~ ~ 1987 - s s ~~~ N L'.~;i ---- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M, Gilliland, Public Narks Insoecto~gZ!- SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Coagletion RECOMEMOATION: ~,~; The required street improvesents for OR 86-22 have been compieted in an acceptable manner and 1t is recowaended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Certificate of Deposit 1n the amount of 58,000.00. Background/Analysis DR 86-22 - located on the east side of 6th Street north of Buffalo Avenue DEVELOPER: Donald Kaplan 612 North Sepulveda N11 1 nt 4nnuloe PJ aM}O Release: Certificate of Deposit (Street) 58,000.00 Respec -1~9ubmitted, , i i c, , MG:sim Attachment /y9 RESOLUTION N0. () ~ ' a~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANON61, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR OR 86-22 ANO AUTHORIZING 7HE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public ingroven!ents for DR AE-22 have been coepleted to the satlsfactlon of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Cowpletion is required to be filed, certifying the work coaglete. NON, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is Hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Coapletion wlth the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~.~/ ~ so ---- CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1988 I T0: City Council and City Manager ~ FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer B.: Steve M. Giiiiiand, -rubiic works inspec~t~~_ ~ I SUBd ECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECOMMENQATION: The required street improvements for OR 85-01 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that Cf ty Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Retice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 512,500. Background/Analysis Dr 85-01 - located on the west side of Amethyst Avenue, north of 19th Street DEVELOPER: TAC Development 9~1J Business Center Drive, Suite B Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) E12,500 Respect su fitted, iR~$MG,~ ~ ~~ Atiachment ~.Sf RESOLUTION N0. S 0 " ~ 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR OR 85-01 AND RUTHORIZ INO THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK uHEREAS the ^.^.SLruct iCr. ^' pub l' i~rc.~erYa for "uR "5-'vl have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work cunplete. NON, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~~ f ~~ nTmv flo n e unvn ni Tn n vn..r. . STAFF REPORT DATE: Apr11 20, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russeil H. Maguire, City Engineer 87: Steve M. Oiliiiand, Public Norks tnspec~ SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECQMMENDATIOY: The required street imgrovemknts for CUP 84-28 have been comyleted Tn an acceptable mmnner and it is recowended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Comyletion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond to the aawunt of 522,000.00. Background/Analysis CUP 84-28 - located on 4he west side of Pecan Avenue, south of Arrow Highway DEVELOPER: Daie Humohrev Trucklna P.0. Box 327 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739-0327 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 522,000.00 Respec ~:u bmitted, RHM:SMG:,jh Attachment /53 RESOLUTION N0. $ p ~~ d A RESOWTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFDRNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 84-28 AND AUTHORI2IN6 THE FILIN6 OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK wHERE0.S, the constructtar, of public i~rovements fcr CL'P 84-2E have been conryleted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and VRiEREAS, a Notice of Coapletion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, be !t resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~~- ~s~ - CITY OF RANCHO CI;CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer B!': Ste re q. Gilliland, Puuiic iiorks Inspecto~~(v! SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Hot ice of Completion '`-~ RECOI9~NOATION: ~~. ~:- The required street improvements for Tract Nos. 9399 and 9400 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of f4,900.00, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Band in the amount of 549,000.00. Background/Analysis Tract Nos. 9399 and 9400 - located on the north side of 9anyan Street, east of Beryi Street. uu ELurEn: rraao corporation 1156 North Tustin Avenue Orange, CA 92667 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) E 4,900.00 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) f49,000.00 Respectfu ~ itted, f ii i/ice %/! R •SMG• 2 Attachment ~55 RESOLUTION N0. ~ B ~ ~ 3 I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS fOR TRACT NOS. 9399 AND 9400 AND AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETIOfI FOR THE WORK .HE"n'cAS, the wnstraction of public improvements far Tract Nos. 9399 and 9400 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to 6e filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, 6e it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and ffle a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. / ~/ ---- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ,,_ DATE: April 20, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Ste.e M. Gill ilard, Rublic wurki inspcctJ~~-I SUBJECT: Release of Maintenance Bond fur Tract 11428, located on the ~ east side of Center Street, south of Church Street RECOMME11D0.TION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one year maintenance perfod has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER: 6ata Design 1925 Center Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) E3, 500 Res pectfu submitted, i ~ ~ RHM: w s my nn n ~ wintrn n,,n ~ wrnwtn n ,._.. ~v.......V .G. STAFF REPORT ~~' <I y !T F' ~ Jia Date: April 20, 1958 ``_- ~q~_ - To: Mayor, Members of City Council, and City Manager From: Robert Rizzo, Assistant City Manager By: Razen McGuire-Emery, Associate Park Planner Subject: Acceptance oP a Grant Deed for windrows Park RECOMMENDATION' That City Council accept from the William Lyon Company, a Grant Deed for Windrows Park. B7ICRGRODND The agreement between The William Lyon Company and rha City calls for the Pletoria Planned Community to develop six park facilities. Windrows Park was the first NeighbnrhnnA Harr so,.+i i«~ completed as part of this agreement. City Council accepted the construction improvements for this park on October 16, 1985. To complete the transaction The William Lyon Company hereby transfers title to Lhe land. Respectfully submitted: /h rt A. ~o Assistant ty Manager ~~ RAR: RMC-E:ba /Sa CITY OF RANCHO CLICAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FRGM: Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director B'i: Linda D. Daniels, Senior Redevelopment Analyst SUBJECT: APPROVE OF CONSTRDCTION COST FOR THE CIVIC CENTER AND PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY FOR ^ISASTER PREPAREDNESS/EMERGENCY AND PUBLIC SAFETY OPERATIONS GuGMONO 9 s, j ~i' i '_ pM1 IA F g, iZ __ I> 19'7 RECOMMENDATION: App[ove construction Cost for the necessary emergency and public safety changes to [he Civic Center and Public Safety facility in the amount not to exceed $98,000. BACKGROUND: On October 21, 1987 staff presented to the City Council proposed changes to the Civic Center and Public Safety facility. The modifications were a result of a detailed review of the facility by the City's Disaster Preparedness Coordinator and the Sheriff's Captain. In order to increase the efficiency of public safety activities as well ac emergency operations in the event of a disaster specific improvements were felt to be necessary for both internal operations ac well as contacr with outside information resources. At the time the specific modifications were submitted, [he Architect had provided the City with an estimate based on the general descriptions of the needed work and not detailed plans. The cost estimate for the constructton was expected to tall rn the range of S4e,uuu to Sµ/,uuu. ANA Ci BIS: The ArchitecC has prepared the detailed plans of the work [hat has been described by the City and the Sheriff's Department which will provide an efficient station and emergency operations ce r,ter. The plans have been reviewed by Che Genezal Contractor and the appropriate sub contractors for a cost quote. Berry Construction has informed the Ci[y that the work identified will cost approximately $98,000 to install. Although the cost is higher than that originally estimated, the inclusion of the needed items are important to the effectiveness of the facility 'in both day to day activities as well as in the event of an emergency. Poopc f~~i i _-__~ ~''~m--'-• Jack Lam, AICP Community Development Director attachment: October 21, 1987 Staff Report ~s 9 Q CITY OF RANCHO CUC ®ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 21, 1987 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council ~~~;GND~ ~ 'n ~' c ~ OI OA F $\~~J z U > 1977 FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director 9Y: Linda D. Daniels, Se nior P.edevelop!!!ent 9nalyst SUBJECT: PROPOSED CHANGES TO PUBLIC SAFETY AND CIVIC CENTER FACILITY RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Architect for the project to develop construction plans and authorize staff to execute a change order with Berry Construction for proposed changes to the Public Safety and Civic Center facility. BACKGROUND: In September 1987, the City Council awarded the bid for the Civic Center and Public Safety facility project to Berry Construction. Since that award of bid, the Sheriff's Department has reconsidered theiz focus of operations and feel that it is important to make some physical changes in order to increase the of Eiciency of the facility operations. ~.i.i: 4: __ ~Fn •:me •ha•_ Fia~_ Fn• ,I,n D~ninnf ~.ru re awarded, ^the City has hired ad Disaster Preparedness Coordinator. Due to the need to have an effective Emergency Operations Center, the Coordinator has reviewed the plans and has recommended that minor changes be made. These changes will add to the City's ability to provide information and emergency services to the public during an emergency situation. Because of the amount of money that the changes are expected to cost, it is necessary for the Council to approve a change order. ANALYSIS: The changes to the Public Safety are outlined as follows: Lower Level Classroom (room L13) - 1. Add a speaker which is connected into the phone paging system and has a volume control switch so that it can be turned on and off. /~D 4 2. Provide ten one inch conduits leading from a second antennae on the roof of the Public 'Saf ety facility and terminating in the Classroom. Five of the conduits should terminate in the northeast corner of the room and five should terminate in the northwest corner of the room. ~ All ten should exit at the flcor level of the room. 3. Provide a conduit line which would allow for Communication between the Revenue Assessment Computer room in the Civic Center facility and the Public Safety Classroom. 4. Provide an adequate conduit to hold ten dedicated phone lines between the classroom and the Conference room (room P22) on the Plaza level which is directly over the Classroom. The conduit should terminate in the Classroom on the east wall directly south of the storage area. The conduit should terminate in the Conference room on the east wall, approximately at its midpoint. 5. Provide two adequate conduits which can hold five dedicated telephone lines each between the Classroom and Communications Room No. 2. The conduits in the Communication Room No. 2 will terminate on the floor. One will be approximately eiq ht feet from the north wall and eight Eeet from the west wail. The second conduit will be approximately eight feet Erom the north wall and eight feet from the east wall. The two conduits will terminate in the !`1 ~anrnnm nn Yho'Flnnr alnnn •6n e! .mll A: nF l.. .•46 ..F the storage area. 6. Provide cable for a television monitor in the Classroom. This cable will be located on the east wall approximately eight feet south of the door. The cable will lead to the roof where it can be attached to a receiving antennae. 7. Provide for tackable wall surface on the west wall of the Classroom. This can be done either by installing a permanent tackable wall material, or by applying tackable wall modules to the surface during emergency situations. 8. Provide a power, telephone and computer outlet in the floor of the Classroom. The string of, floor outlets are to be approximately .::elvs fact no: th o,. the sou ti, waii and midpoint in the room. Antennae - 9. Add a second mast on the roof of the Public Safety facility which antennae can be attached to in emergency situations. The mast should be located on directly above Conference room P22. Conduits leading from this second // 1 1_, roof antennae to the classroom, and the two communication rooms must be provided. The conduit leading to the Classroom will terminate in two locations as described in Number 2 above. Kitchen - 10. Relocate the of Eice designated for Inmate (L15) in the Public Safety Facility to the area designated for Laundry (L02), The Inmate area will now be a kitchen tc scrcice the C'-assrooa,. F. door opening will be provided on the west side of the room. Kitchen facilities to include a sink, small built in refrigerator, formica counter top, outlets for coffee makers and toaster oven above counter top, a built in microwave oven and storaye cabinets below and above the counter. 11. Provide a mop sink in the Lower Level storage room (L10) of the Public Safety facility. 12. Relocate the Lunch room (POS) and the Lounge (P06) to the Traffic Sargeant (P29), Shift Commander (P28) and Administrative Sargeant (P25) office area. In doing so, all of the plumbing, speakers and other special equipment or designs necessary for the operation of the Lunch room shall be relocated. 13. Tne area where the Lunch room (P05) and the Lounge (P06) were will now become two of Eices. On the west side of the area will be a Lieutenant offira ~s -- clr 1,' uy ii,e aoor opening shall be on the~~west side of the office. The east side of the new area will be a Traffic Sargeant office of approximately 15' by 17'. 14. The janitor closet on the Plaza level (P15) must Contain a mop sink. 15. The room labeled Special Investigation (P30) shall be relabeled Crime Prevention. 16. The office space area where the Probation office (P31) and Crime Prevention (P32) now occupy shall now become three offices. Starting on the west side of this area, two separate Citizen Re~Ort Rooms, of approximately 9' by 13' each, and one Probation office of app: cxisa tely 10` by 13'. •i•he doer t e ,riost westerly Citizen Report Room will be on the west wall (opening from the corridor). The doors for the second Citizen Report Room and the Probation office will open Erom the north wall (ofE of the lobby area). Civic Center - 17. The meeting room (L on the lower level will now be used to house the offices for the Disaster Preparedness ~y~ ! • Coordinator and support staff. In order to do, this a private office of approximately 14' by 13' and a private conference room of approximately 11' by 14. The remainder of this area will 6e devoted to housing personnel in open office systems furniture, filing and storage and a seating area. In order to accomplish this new walls, power, telephone and computer connections/outlets will have to be located and installed. In reviewing these changes with the"'Architect; he eskimate that the amount of work from his offices, as well as the consultants, will cost between $10,000 and $12,000. In reviewing these changes with Berry Construction, their Project Manager hds received preliminary estimates from the subcontractors that these changes will add between $40,000 and $47,000 to the cost of the project.' Respectfully ublmitte /n~a ,/(II Jack Lam, AICp Community Development Director ~~3 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMGNGA STAFF REPORT Date: April 20, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Nervy MurakosM , Associate Civil Engineer 1 &, Sub,}ect: The setting of a public hearing date of NednesdAy, MAy 18, 1988 and direct the City Clerk to submit an Environmental Assessment Notice for advertisement to the Da11y Report for Etiwanda Stop Drain, Phase I, located rest of I-15, north of Victoria Avenue from the Victoria Basin to north of Highland Avenue and future Route 30 Freeway. RECONNEMOATION• It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution for the setting of a Public Nearing on the City Council's next meeting date of Nednesday, May 18, 1988, for the Etiwanda Story Drain Environmental Assessment Review and that it direct the City Clerk to submit an Environmental Assessment Notice for advertisement to the Daily Report by Thursday, April 21, 1988 for c one-time publication on Sunday, April 24, 1988, ten calendar days prior t0 said ppuublic hearing date pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements. BACKBNOIIID/AMALTSI S• This report presents the Engineering Staff's request to set a Public Hearing date for the above subJect Environmental Assessment Review. Said Assessment Review 1s in conformance with CEQA requirements and shalt render an envtrorwaental evaluatlpn of the City's proposed Etiwanda Storvn Drain. Respectfully submitted, r / ../ ~ ~ • ~~ Attachment lGy RESOLUTION N0. p ~ - a 3 ~- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGII, APPROdIN6 AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF NEDNESDAY, MAY 18, 1988 FOR THE PROPOSED ETINANDA STORM DRAIN ENVIRONlENTAL ASSESSpENT REYIEN NHEREAS, Lhe City Council has directed the City's Engineering Sraff and Assrxlated EngtReers to proceed xith fersal designs for a flood control facility serving the Etlwanda Stores Drain area; and NHEREAS, said designed storm drain requires an Environmental Assessment; and NHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment has been prepared pursuant to the Californta Environmental Quality Act, as mended. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1: TNe City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaronga hereby approves an se s a public hearing date of Nednesday, May 16, 1988 at 7:30 p.m. to be held at the LIons Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, Californta for the Ettwanda Storm Drain Envlrorrental Assessment Review; and Section 2: The City Clerk 1s directed to submit the attached City of Rancho u`~cmon;aa Envlron~ental Assesssront Notice for advertisewent to Liic vaii,r neyvrt uy ~nuay, nyrii o, iiao ivr a one-Lime pnol iCaq On On Friday, May 6, 1988, ten calendar days prior to said public hearing date pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements. IT- ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NOTICE Complete environmental assessments have been prepared for the following project(s). The City Council viii be considering these assessments, staff's recommendation, and Dublic input, at their meeting of Nay 18, 1988 prior to making a final envtrorwental determination. Following 1s a brief description and location of the project(s) and staff's recommendation on the project(s) to be considered. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSIENT AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED ETINANDA STORM DRAIN - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - The project begins north of Victoria Stone Drain Basin, traverses northerly, crossing under Highland Avenue and Foothill Freeway corridor to a temporary ending. The drain terwinates temporarily north of the freeway corridor from which the line will eventually extend westerly along the freeway corridor ffi pickup drainage frw the north and west and in particular drainage from East and Etiwanda Avenues. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the Environmental Assessment and issuance of a Negative Declaration for the proposed Etiwanda Stores Drain. A copy of the Environmental Assessment can be reviewed at the C1LY of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division Office iocated at 9320 Base Line Rosd, Suite '8', Rancho Cucamonga, California. Nrltten comments should be addressed to cne tngr veering U1vlston, City of Rancho Cucamonga, P.O. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91736, or phoned at (714) 989-1862. In addition, concerns can be addressed to the C1ty Council publicly at the meeting time previously mentioned. The meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. and shall take place at Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. PUBLISH: May 6, 1988 ~y°So e ^ e w~ > ~0^ al!~~~~~ HIGHLAND tli 26' AVE. Q ~ a z a 1z- .~,::-' 3 ~ wcroRia I~'~:':;;~~; t W nncir-IC IlAILf~OAD BASELINE /~ /// ROAD VARIES 40' MIN. CHANNEL LINING PER SP 192E Sta. 12 - 26- C. T. C. 26--31 ^ 108" RCP 31--38^ C. T C. 38~-45- 102"/108" RCP 45--51- 51~ - 72- C. T. C. O/45~-27- 48'60" RCP 0~72~-7.7- 54"/60" RCP SSE I P I ,~, N \ a; 40' ~ . -6' Ci 13.5' 13.5' 16' WHI \l~ ON r~ 1 OG. ..~. I Z` i'7 ~ 1g'1 GRADE TO DRAIN WHERE SHOWN ON PLAN (TYP, BOTH SIDES) 9 / r ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION INITIAL STUDY -PART I GENERAL For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted *_o the Develoxert Resew Cainittee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Planning Dlvtston staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study and make recommendations to Pianning Commission. The Planning Commission will make one of three determinations: (I) The project will have no sigyn if scant environmental i~act and a Negative Declaration will be filed, (2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or (3) An additional information report should 6e supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. Date Filed Project Title: Eti wands Storm Drain Line 2-1, Phase I Applicant's Name, Address, Telephone: Citv of Rancho Cucamonga S a9n a I ~ a ahoy as n_~yh~ryra~nga_ (:A 91730 name, aadress, Telephone of Person To Be Contacted Concerning this Project: uonrv M,raknchi. Acsoriate Civii Engineer Community Development Uepdrt,.ien t, ~1 ~5' of fig echo tiuccrooi qua (714) 9li5-1862, Ext. 32U Location of Project: The project is located vithin the Eti~randu Area of the City of Rancho L'ucamonga. being east of East Avenue bounced on the south by the Vic to rip Ra cin .end eetend ins 400 feet north of NimhlanU AVetme Assessor's Parceh No._ _. _. NLA list other permits necessary from local, regional, state and tederai agencies and the agency issuing such permits: Euc rose hrnent permit From State of California Deoa Ytment of TrancpgrtaTinn, n{_t"+'Ct :j tp S Ruutc 30 and Fui, tiiiii :rao~;ay Corridor. Connection permit from San Bernardino County Flood Control District to connect to Victoria Basin. j~ ~ ., PROJECT DESCRIPTION Proposed use or proposed project: A master Dlan flood control facility S rVinQ,,,E~` "^a' Vnr~m oral areae 1 & 2 Acreage of project area and souare Ppotags of exiting and proposed buildings, if aly: a o N{A Describe the envirommental settle of the project site including informatign on topography, so sta ty, pants (trees), land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of surroundtng properties, and the description of any existing Structures and their use (attach necessary sheets): mo ~n;err tncar>d north of the Victoria Stone Drain Basin traverses a .ter v;otw rnnt;nnsnn northerly crossing under Highland Avenue and the foothill c.eo~„v rnrr;w„r cn a temoorarv ending. The area is covered vith native grasses. rna is "bottom land" paralleling the Etiwanda Creek. Streamiets cross the .yam carrvinq highr+av ^un-off from Highland Avenue. The drain terminates temoorartty north of the freeway corridor from which the line will eventually Le r r n e r tv at~_n. itiA ~^^-::~: - 'Jv, to vtcxuo drainaoe from the north -~,+ ,.~atr ann ;n n-rti.~lirJ ~r~ drainagg from East and Etiwanda Avenues is the project part of a larger project, one of a series cf cum;tlative actions. which althcugh individual ty s^all, may as a whole have significant environmental irrytatt This is the first chase of a series of master plan storm drain p~•ojects which will serve tf+e Etiwanda Area of the City of Ranch Cucamonga. l~9 ., MILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? yy 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise of produce vibration or glare? x 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? _ K 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or General Plan designations? _ g 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? 73 ~. 6. Create the need for use or disp osal of potentially hazardous materials such as tox ic substances, flammables or explosives? _ ~ Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): 13 trees fall within the intended starm channel aii nnent and will be required to he removed. 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this protect will generate daily: N/A 8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this pro,iect:_ 9. Estimate the amount of grading (tutting and f111fng) required for this prof ect, in Cubic yards: __ 10. If the protect involves the construction of residential units, complete the farm on the next page. CERTIFICATIOII: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and uelinf. 1 fi~rthor pnAeretand that +dditi olnai ii,fvTwat iGi, may be required t0 be submftted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Planning Division. Oate: i Y Y ~ Signature Tf ~~~ • ~~ -~ << ~r Title Associate Civil Engineer 7b I-3 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid the school district in assessing their ability to accommodate the proposed residential development. Developers are required to secure letters fran the school district for accommodating the increased number of students prior to issuance of building permits. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No. Specific Location of Protect PHASE I PHASE Z PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Nun~er of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: a. Earliest date of occupancy: Modell and i of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Ranae ~/ I-4 '. ~ ~ -t'~ cIn or gANrnD cocASONCA PART ZI - INITLAL snDY ENVZRONi(E4, rAL CHECKLIST APPLiC.LVT: r;t„ of Rzn~6 r g fnmm nity Dete7ooment Department FILING DATE: LOC NUMBER: PROJECT: Etiwanda Storm Drain Line 2-1 Phase I PROJECT LOCATION: Etf Wanda Area - Citv of Rancho Cucamonga I. ENVIRO`iMENTAL I[~@AC7H (Erplanatfon of all "qas" and "maybe" anavers are rpuired on ettachad sheets). yEH HAYHE NO 1. So Els and Geolo¢y. Will the proposal have signu scant rnsul[s Ln: a. Unstable ground conditions or Sn changes !m .,, . . -___o_ .~_...vu.i,ipsi X b. Dis rupclona, dEsplacsmsnu, compaction of burial of the soil? x c. Change in eopography or ground aurfaca contour intervalai X , d• rha destruction, covering oz modEffearion of any uaiqua geolagic ar physical feacuraa? x •. My potential incnua Sn wind ox vatar erosion of soils, affecting either on or off •ite condECOns? _~ -~ x •. Cnan a.• /n .a,. ,.. _ _.. _. _...,,.. a«u.. ', dr depoticions x H. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such a mrchquakaa, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hasatds? ~ x h. M increase in cha rate of a¢eraccion and/or uu o[ any mineral resourn? _ x 2. Nyd ro lo¢y, Will the proposal have aignlficant ruulta Ln: / 7~- =age 2 YES "AYBE \0 a. Changes in currents, ar Che course of direc clop of flowing streams, rivers, ar ephemeral Stream channels'. ~_ _ b. Changes in abaorp cion [sees, drainage patterns, or the race and amounc of surface vacer runoff? ~ _ c. Alcerationa to the eoura• of flow of flood vatera" ~ _~ _ d. Change in cha amount of surface vatnr in any body of vacer? ~'_ _ e. Discharge into surface vatera, oY any alcera cion of surface vacer quality? _,_ ~ f. Al teratioo of growdvacer eharacterlatica? _ ~ X g. Chaaga Sn cha gwnticy of groupdvaeara, either through dlrscc addltlooa or viCh- dravala, or through interferenea with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? x _ h. Tl:e reduct fan in the ampwt oP wNS otMr- viae available for Dub11e vacer supplies? ~ Y 1. Exoosuse of ee,.nt~ :.- .: .: ~ ' flooding or saichea? [slated hasarda meh as _ x _ 3. Afr Qualf cv. Will the proposal have aignfficant [caul ca in: a. Constant or parfodic air eauesiona from mobil. or indince aoureas7 ^, ~ Y, Stationary sourcaa? ,_ Y b. Dstarioration of ambfant air quality and/or intarfarencs vlth the •c aicroant of applicable air gwllcy standards? _ ~ e. Al esracion of local or regional cllautlc tC^.QitiGni, afficr3 ng a_ir ~.__...., ~.. t4ra or temperature? __ X 4. BSota F1_~ra. Will Cha prapoaal have aignfficant results in: •. Change in the characterlatlcs of species, Snclud ing divas lty, die crl6u cion, ar numbs[ of any specie. of plane? / ~ 2 ~~ x b. Rsdutt loo of the numbers of any unique, cars or sadanpnd spscfu o[ plants? ,_ x ?a¢e 3 YES `41YEE ~0 C. Introduction of nev or disruptive specl ea of plants into an area? x d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? x Fauna. Will [he Oropoaal havt significant resul ca in: a. Change in the characterlacica of anerlee, including diversity, dlatribuclon, ar numbers of amy species of aplmals? x b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? x c. Introduction of new or disruptive apatite of animals into an arse, Or [caul[ to a barrier to [he migration or movement of anlmals4 _ _ x d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish ox wildlife habitat? _ e ~ 5. Population. W111 the proposal have significant reaul cs in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or grouch rata of the human population of an area? ,~ ~ D. Will the propaaal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional how ingt ]L 6. Soc1o-Economic Factors. Will the proposal hove aignificant results in: a. Chavge in local or regional socio-economic charactaristita, including acanosic or commarcLl divaraitq, tax rate, and property values? ~ _ b. WS11 project costs be equitablq distributed aaang project hmaElc iarfu, La., buysrs, tax payers or prof att users? i. land IIae and Planning Conaidaratione. Will rha prcposal have signiElcant results in? a. A subs tsntlal alteration of the present or planned land we of an araa7 ~_ _ b. A tonfllec with any dulgnat loot, obj attivu, policies, or adopad plane of any govarnmsncal enclties? / 7 ~l _ ~ e. M impact upon the qula lay or gwntity of existing eonaumptlve or non-eonaumpClve iltreatlonal opportunitiu? _ _ y,,,_ Page 4 YES ,ypygc ~O 8. Transoor[atlon. 4111 the proposal have significant resin [s in: a• Geneza[Son of substan[lal addlcional vehicular movement? _ x b. Effects on existing stree[s, or demand for vev streK <ona[ruction? x c. Eff!cta oa axistirg parking fa<illtias, or demand for nav parking? x d. Substanclal impact upon existing czansporca- [ion systems? x e. Alcezationa to present patterns of clrcula- tfon or movement of people and/or goods? x f. Alterations to or effects on pruent and potentlal vacer-borne, rail, mass traaaie or air irafFle? _ x g. Iacreaes So [raffle hasarde to motor vehicles, 6lcgclists or pedestrians? h. Access to adjoini n9 properties X 9. Cultural Resources Will [h x . a proposal have -- ugnlficane usults in: s. A die curbanc• to the integriey of archaeologi<a1, r----~.+..Ve.~u, ano{or niscosical reaourcea7 _ x_ 10. Health. gafecv and Nuisance Paetora. 4111 the proposal love significant resulo Lo: •. Creation of any health hasard oz poseetfal health hazard? - -~ r_ D. Exposure of people to potentlal health hazards? --_ .]L <. A rink of explosion or release of hasardous eubstaaaer In she even[ of an accident? -- _~ X. d. M Snereaee in the number of lndfviduala or species o[ vet coz or pathenogen is _.. o rea••....i cr thv exposure of people to each organlasu? --_ JL •. Zncruse in existing noiw Lvels? -~ ~L f. Exposure o[ people to potentially dangerous noise lavels2 _~ ~ g• The creation of obj eeclonable odors? -- IL h. M increase In light or glareT ~ x 75 Fage i YrS :'AYBE `i0 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have sign lficant re sults Sn: a. The obatzuction or d¢gradacion of any scenic vista or viw? __ >i b. 'fhe creation of an aes[hetltally offensive aiee? x c. A conflict vlth the obi ec tiv. of 3r_!gnatsd or potential scenic corridors? _ ~ 12. Ue S11i1es and public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need fos nw agatema, or alterations to the following: e. Electric paver? X 6. Natural or packaged gu7 __ X. c. Coamunlcationa ayatamT e ~L d. Water supply? Y e. Wutwatar facilities? Y f. Flaod control atruccur¢a? .Y.~ ~- g. Solid wasu fsc111t1aaT X. h. Fire protection? __ X 1. Police protection? 3. Sehaola? - .-_ 1L k. parks or other raeteatfonal fat Slitiaa? -_ ~ 1. Nainunanca of public facilities, Sncluding roads aed flood control fac111tiesT ..IL __ _ m. Other govammancal aarvieaa? __ x 13. Enarav and S<arca Resources. Will the proposal hsv= aisn:f lvaBE raauira ~a• a. Use of suhstantlal or excaaaiva fuel or energy? _ x b. Substantial lnereaa• in daund upon eslating aourcea of energy? _ x c. M lncraaae 1n iha demand for dwalopment of nav aourcea of energyT _ x d. M incratae or parpatwcion of iha consumption of non-ranwabla lotma of anargy, when faatible ranwabla wurcaa o[ energy an availab l~T x - ~_ ~7~ gage 6 YES `*AYBE !IO e. Substa¢tial depleefon of any nonrenewable or acarcc natural resource? x 14. Nandatozv Findings of Sianiflcsnte. a. Does the project Nava the pota¢tial to degrade the gwllty of the environment, auba[antlally reduce the habieac of ffah or vildlite species, caws a tish ar wildlife popula6lon to drao below ulf ausuieing 1Wala, thzeatan to elimiwu • plant or aaimal coaswnity, reduce the ¢Ymbai Or YleCriCL eha saga et a race Or mdaagerad plant or animal oe eliminate lnporcanc examples o[ the naj or pstioda of California history or prehiacory? ~ x b. Does cha project have the potential to achieve shore-term, to the disadvaataga of lo¢g-term, mvironmeneal goaleT (A abort-ust~ impact on the arviro¢mant i• ono which occurs 1n a relatively brief, definitive period a[ time while loog- tern impacts will endure yell into the future). _ ,~_ e. Dose the prof act have lmpacta wAieh ass iadividwlly limited, but cuswlatively considerableT (Cumulativalq cotuidanbia meow chat the Sacranantal ettaen eL an 1¢dividwl prof act art considara6le when viewed in Connection with the etfaeta of o••t •.,.. ~-~_-, ana probable futurn ptojecca). x d. Does the project have anvironmantal effaces which will cauaa subatanCial sdvarae atfecta oa hwan beings, either directly oz iadlrec[lyT x II. DISCDSSION OF ENVIRDNMElRAL EYALUA7IDN (1. a., at attirmatlve answers to she above quntlow plw a diacwsion of proposed mitigation maaaures). 7 Pa3e 7 III. DEIEA.YINATION On the basis of this iai tiai evaluation: a I find tha proposed project MULD NOT have a eignlficant effect on the navirovment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although eha proposed prof set could have • significant effect on tbs environment, there will not De a significant effect in chla case because [ha mltigaion maaauras described on as at ached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION STILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project IMY have a significant effect on the envirmuant, and an ENVIRONMENT LNPACT REPORT is required. Date •j- ~-.f {' ~ /'!4-.cr-~O~J-f S/igna~ure Title II. DISCUSSION OF ENYIRONMENTAL EYALUAT ION 1. Soils and Geology b b c Disruption, displacement, compaction or burial of the soil? YES Change in topograpFry or ground surface contour intervals? YES The Phase I construction of Etiwanda Store Drain Line 2-1 consists of an open trapezoidal shape channel 6 feet deep, 27 feet wide at the top and 9 feet wide at the bottom. At either side of the channel, a 16 foot graded roadway will be constructed with 2 to 1 slopes graded up to match the existing or natural grade from 1 foot to 3 above the roadway. For the east part, the construction will cut into the existing soil generating about 10,500 cubic yards of excess material to be disposed of. The contractor will be required to dispose of this excess material at an offslte disposal site approved by the City. f. Changes in erosion siltation or deposition? MAYBE The existing drainage course consisting of normally dry streamlets exhibits primarily sheet flowage with minfmal erosion occuring. The new Storm Drain Channel will be fully concrete lined eliminating any erosion to the drainage course and will reduce siltation occuring at the Victoria Basin. New cut slopes will be created which are sub,{ect to erosion along the length of the channel. These will be graded with a "brow" ditches above the cut slope to control such erosion. Periodic side inlets will also be provided along the length; of the channel to receive and discharge the surface flowage to the channel. A determination has also been made regarding run-off from future streets adjoining the channel and lateral stub outs have been or will 6e constructed as part of the project. These stub outs will be sealed until the improvements are made within the existing basin to accaaodate new ar additional 4t4rm run-off betng delivered to t!!e basin (see Item 2 for ad6lttanal information 1. 2. Hydrology Hill the proposal have significant results in a. Changes in the currents, or the course of direction of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeras stream channelsl MAYBE The proposed project improves a newly forming streamlet or drainage swale where street run-off fray Highland Avenue east of East Avenue has been directed to surface flow to the Ytctoria Basin and where surface flowage north of Highland Avenue have been collected into a culvert under Highland Avenue and again outletted to surface flow directed towards the basin. The initial project will accomplish little more than collect these flows and deliver such by an tmprovsd flood control channel emptying into the Victoria Basin. In the future, however, the drain will serve as the first leg of a ma,~or or master storm drain system to intercept storm run-off from East Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue and to carry such waters easterly, detiveri ng these flood waters to the Victoria 9asfn where s controlled release of such to Etiwanda Creek can occur. Eventually, therefore, as subsequent extensions are built following this project, a significant increase to flood water delivery to the Victoria Basin will occur. f gv b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water run-off? YES As noted Tn item a) above, the ultimate storm drainge system to be ..onpleted in later passes or extensions to *,his facili*,y witt intercept street run-off from East Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue. The intercepted run-off wilt be delivered to the Yictoria Basin and then discharged to Etiwanda Creek. The run-off rate is changed little by the iwaediate proposed improvement. The ultimate extension of suchwill collect and 6lscharge a significantly greater volume of flood water to the Victoria Basin and thereafter tothe upper reaches of Etiwanda Creek between the Victoria Basin and Foothill Boulevard than has heretofore occured. The Victoria Basin will therefore be required to hold the peak flow of these flood waters and to release such gradually to Etiwanda Creek. Basin improvements will be needed reduce the discharge rate to 90% of the existing peak discharge from the basin as required by virtue of the pe~mtt required to discharge to the basin.. This towered discharge rate wtll however, be sustained for an extended period to accomodate the increased run-off. The absorption rate of the old streamlet area above the basin will be reduced by the construction of a hardened channel. The new channel construction will place the Victoria Basin heretofore an old borrow pit into active snryi,e as a f1ooA cor.*.rol fac'.lity intended ultimately to provide for ground water recharge or ground water absorption for a portion of the storm waters delivered to the basin. Again, such will not occur until the overall system is completed in prolects subsequent to this one. ~r~ c. Alternations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES As previously noted, the primary intent of the ultimate facility will be to Intercept flood waters occuring on fast Avenue and E ti wandd Avenue dnd rhannal ydCh safely to tha Yir tQria gaein and tp gradually release such back to Etiwanda Creek. d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? YES (eventually!) The initial result of this immediate protect has little effect on the amount of surface water on East Avenue anQ Etiwanda Avenues and in the Victoria Basin and upper reaches of Etiwanda Creek. In subsequent phases of the Etiwanda Storm Drain Protect, surface wa*.ers on East and Etiwanda Avenues are taken into the drain and diverted to the Victoria Basin. The amount of surface run-off or flood water received by the Victoria Basin is increased from the existing condition but for the first time, the use of the Victoria Basin as a flood control facility will occur i.e.; this improvement along with subsequent protects will provide the primary collection and delivery mechanism to bring flood waters to the basin. Heretofore, minimal usage of the basin has existed. g. Change in Lhe quantity of ground waters, either through direct addition or withdrawals, or through Interference with an aquifer? Quantity? MAYBE Victoria Basin is sited to be used for ground water recharge with the eventual improvement of Etlwanda and San Sevalne Creeks by the County of San Bernardino and Armiy Corps of Engineers. To date, the natural run-off reaches the basin 1s minimal and remains unchanged by virtue of the proposed protect. Mhen the system 1s completed and ~~~ ma,{or storm run-off can be delivered to the basin by this and the subsequent channel extension protects.. The dead storage provided by the basin will allow for percolation of these flood waters to the ground. This will eventually sustain a planned ground water recharge effort, an Intended also of the basin. i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches7 M11YBE The eventual stone drain in itself is proposed to reduce and eliminate flood hazards from certain reaches of East and Etiwanda Avenues and serves as an umbrella to land areas south of Highland in the Etiwanda Area. The channel itself however, becomes a new hazard. Channel fencing is therefore Droposed to limit access to the channel to mitigate this hazard. 6. Socio-Economic Factor will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in local or regional socio-economic characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity, Lax rate and property value54 MAYBE The Rancho Cucamonga community 1s experiencing a rapid and a very susiained growth i.^. reside.^.*_ial developaxrt. Thy area which the ultimate storm drain system serves is predominately vacant and targeted for development. The installation or creation of these new first time flood control facilities will remove a motor environmental deterant to such development. As these developments occur, property values are pushed upward. The proposed storm drain 8.3 improvement could therefore become an indirect provision allowing development and property values to rise. b. Wi11 the protect cost be equitably distributed among protect be.^.eficiaries, i,e ~ buyers, taxpg;ers or protect ;:5er5? Ycs The source of funding for this initial construction is Drainage Fee's collected from developments occuring within the Ettwanda Area. No assessment spread or other taxation is occuring at this time. Existing homeowners and rest dents either have alreaQy paid fees or escape taxation from this initial protect. A11 new development will pay for a drainage fees to support the subsequent costs of extending tF,is system or will be required to build that portions of the system which would directly serve their development. The possibtlity of the creation of a Storm Drainage D!strtct to fund the remaining protect extersions !s ever present ar of potential. 7. Land Use and Punning Consideration Mill the proposal have significant results in1 a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? MAYBE The installation of this first storm drain in its dry cond+tion will change about four (4) acres of vacant or dormant land to a hardswpe farll fly os little change. As the storm drain is continued in later protects, the same affect will be noted. The resultant will though, remove a motor natural deterant to the development of this area of the Rancho Cucamonga community (Etlwanda area). 8. Transportation /~7 Mill the proposal have significant results in: g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? N4 This initial protect would appear to have no affect positive or negative regarding traffic hazards. The ultimate extension or completion of the drain to serve East and Etiwanda Avenues will serve to remove an existing flooding condition along portions of these two streets and the areas south of Highland between Etiwanda and the Victoria Basin. A wave effect reducing floodings all the way to the southerly City limits should be realized. h. Impact Access to AdJolning Properties? YES The storm drain location being an open flood control channel, will reduce access to the easterly lvi na orooerti es adtoi ni na_ tha flnnn controi channel. [n the present condition, this is of minimal significance. In the long term, such will take on greater importance. The easterly adJotning properties will be bounded on the west try this new storm drain facility, on the north by the Foothill Freeway Corridor and on the east by the Etiwanda Creek and 1-15 Freeway and on the south by the Victoria Basin. At present, access to these properties is from Highland Avenue. It is noted however, that when the Foothill Freeway is constructed, Highland Avenue x111 become or be replaced by tha Freewav and that new access must be taken from the west across the new channel. To this end, two locations for crossing the channel have been identified and access to cross the channel at these two locations have been reserved by the easterly lying parcels as part o9 the J 0 S sales contract for the Flood Control Right-of-May acquired by the City. It will remain however, the responsibility of these easterly properties to provide bridge or culvert structures to all the future roadways to cross the channel at these two locations. The proposed Foothill Freeway is also to be considered in the planning of this facility. The location of the drain will parallel the north side of the freeway corridor. Coordinatton efforts to realign the drain to provide for freeway on and off ramps have been provided for. Sufficient depth and structurel design for the drain has also been provided where the drain will cross the freeway corridor using a closed reinforced concrete culvert or pipe. 12. Utilities and Public Services Mill the proposal have a significant need for new systems or alterations to the following: f. flood control structures? YES In gaining approval to connect to the basin, the need to provide a new bottom outlet to the 6as1n, the need to provide an overflow spillway and the need to remove additional materials from the basin is required by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District as conditions of the permit to connect or discharge flood water to the basin facility. The City and County will {otntly partictpate in providing for some of these basin improvements. The bottom drain, spillway and initial basin enlargements will occur as part of the neighboring Day Creek Improvement Project which will mine the basin for core material for the Day Creek Debris Dam. In the event further excavations are needed within the basin, the City will require excavations to be ~8~ performed by parttes wishing to develop upstream of the noted facilities. The extension of the systems to East and Etlwanda Avenues and tributary drains extending north along these streets shall also becoiae "conditions of development" or be provided using fee's collected from the developwent of these tributary 3re3s. 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? The new channel adds additional flood control facility to the system for which maintenance must be provided. The drain will became a City drain requiring City maintenance. Construction standards for the proposed facility have been set for facilities operated by the San Bernardino County Fiaod Control Dtstrict and could be transferred to the County upon their acceptance. 0 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: April 20, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: JuQy Atosta, Jr. Engineering Aide -,t,, SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Tract No. 13425, located east of Haven Avenue between Highland Avenue and 19th Street, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No. 45 and setting the date of public hearing for Mey 18, 1988 RECDMNENCRTIDN It is recommended that Ctty Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 45 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described pro,~ects to landscape Maintenance District No. 1. Analysis/Background Attached for City Council approval 1s a resolution declaring the City's ~_.._. .. ...... r...... u. ,oa nc i...~.• .__. s u...... ~...._.~_ •,... ~.__ Highland Avenue an6 14thVstreet, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Annexation No. 45 and setting the public hearing date for May 18, 1488. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subiect annexation. A letter from the developer requesting the subiect annexation is on file 1n the Engineering Division. Resp y tted, { / :sd Attachments /~ RESOLUTION N0. ~ ~ ~ ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 0.5 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 !{HEPEAS, on P.pril 2D, 1998, the City Council of the Ctty of Rancho Cucasonga directed the City Engineer to sake and file with tfie City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by 4he Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has sade and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report 1n writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration: and WHEREAS, said Ctty Counctl has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor arty part thereof, requires or should be sodlfie6 to any respect. NON, THEREFORE 8E IT RESOLVED by the City Counctl of the City of Rancho Cucasonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Esttabte of the itemized costs and expenses o~l~work and of the incidental expenses 1n connection therewith, contained in Bald report be, and each of then are hereby, preliminarily cYp~,,.~,, o„G cc~;Ff~„;~~. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descri6e~fn said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily aDDroved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in safdlrssessment District in proportion to the estisated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, Eros said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report fo~Fie purposes of all subsequent Droceedings, and pursuant to the propoa2d dt'a trtL t. ~~s CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 ANNEXATION N0. 45 fur Tract No. 13425 SECTION I. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California ,Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972}. SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new subdivisions into Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract 13425 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the recorded Map as roadwaiy right-of-wdy ar easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering D1v151on. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of th15 report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty iS.301 cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 including Annexation No. 45 is as follows: Landscape Area No. of D. U. Existing Annex Oistrict No. 45 992,052 64,829 9,620 71 New Total Per lot Annual Assessment 1,056,881 x f .30 235 x 5.00 f318,239,30 9,691 5317,064.30 = 1.174.00 (318,239.30 f 32.84 ~~ 1,056,881 9,691 Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 5 and the attached assessment diagram. Nhere the development covered by this annexation involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners association, khese assessments shall be reduced. SECTION 5. Assessment Dfagram A copy of the QroQosed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled 'Exhibit A , ,.y thi; reference the diagraw is hereby incorporatzd within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment [mprovements for the District are found to be of general benefit to ail lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Nhere there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. The City Council will hold a public hearing 1n June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by khe City during the previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adapts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearln9 and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. j 9i Properties and ingroveaoents to be included within Annexation No. 45 to Landscape Maintenance District Na. 1: MAINTAINED AREA TRACT D/U ST$E7~- --TO~OND-CDVER TREES' Sit. ~4. tF- :3425 71 19th St. --- i3,S6i 6a Pa1a~ Dr. --- 0 47 Ring Ave. --- 4,116 3 Highiand Ave. --- 41,052 50 Alameda Ave. --- 0 29 Shawna Ave. --- 0 30 Finch Ave. --- 0 it 64,829 235 /~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM w a w i~ ~ 0 4 f .~°i~'~"'?, CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,~~OI~(Gp ;~~~~ ~~~ 't+ ,~ EN(;INEERING DIVISION `" ~ ~' VICINITY :~1AP im LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. y RESOLUTION k0. ~' ~$ ' a A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON6A, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEJUITION AS ANNEXATION N0. 45 TO LANDSCAPE 14AINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 19?2 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OB,IECTIO'AS THERETG NOM, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaaanga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descri Lion of Nork: That the public interest and convenience requi-re an s t n noon of this City Council to fore a autlntenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the waintenance and operation of those parkways and faciltites Lherean dedicated for cor•on greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of the proposed aaintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said malntenarKe and operation inCiudes the cost and supervision of any sprinkler systes, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting, structures, and walls in connection with said parkways. SECTION 2. Location of Nork: The foregoing described work is to be lOCdted w~t~iln roadway r n f-n -r+,y anA lanAg~+ej.... n+~.~.....-..;tp ~< ! ~-~~~~-- Maintenance District No. 1 enumerated in the report of the City Englneerrand more particularly described on naps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled 'Mnexatlon No. 45 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1°. SECTION 3. Descri tton of Assessment District: 7ha4 the centeaiptat~e woT, in a op n on o sa ty unc is of amore than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which 4lstrtct is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamo;,ga included within the exterior boundary iine5 sha„n Ilnnn {he{ row{air n~ryp of Annc'xa'tiCri Nv. 45 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1' heretofore approved by the City Council of said City by Resoiutlon No. *, indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within the proposed assessment district and which nbp 1s on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. l~~ SECTION 4. Report of~Engs_n_eer: The C1LY Council of said City by Resolution o. as approved the report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled 'Engineer's Report, Annexation No. 45, Landscape Maintenance 0lstrict No. 1' is on file to the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amoun*_ and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: TAe assessment shall be collected~l:he same me an n same axanner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determlrted. SECTION 6. Time and Place oD Heearnnq: Notice 1s hereby given that on Mqy 18985, at t your o he City Council Chaabers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any ob~ecttons to the work or extent of the assessment district, mqy appear and show cause wtif said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each styner thereof 1s interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set Por the hearing, and no other protests or objections wilt be considered. If the signer of any protest 1s not shown upon the last equalized assessment roil of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. acc uuw i. ~andsca in and L1 htln Act of 1972: Ali the work herein propose sail a ne an carr e t roug n pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California BestgnateQ the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be ma~uant to ec on o e vernmen ode. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once 1n The Da11 Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of n r o, a ornla, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. / -/ - CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONGA STAFF REPORT / DATE: April 20, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer oy. J"dy Ac„s~a, ~r °n ^yin2er ,;-y ide ~ SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Tract No. 13425, located east of Haven Avenue between Highland Avenue and 19th Street, to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 as Annexatf on No. 42 and Annexation No. 27, respectively, and setting the date of public hearing for May 18, 1988 REC01lENDATIDN It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Reports for annexation Nos. 42 and 27 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described tract to Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2. analysis/Background Attached for City Council approval are resolutions declaring the City's intent to annex Tract No. 13425, located east of Haven Avenue between Highland Avenue and 19th Street, to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No. 42 and to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 as Annexation No. 27 and setting the public hearing date for May 18, 1988, Also attached for Council consideration are resolutions giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's ReDOrts for the sub,lect annexations. A letter from the developer requesting the subJect annexations is on file in the Engineering Division. Respec subm ted, Attachments i / ~. ..~ _ nHM; ~Hm.~___ /9;, RESOLUTION N0. 8 ~ -~ 3J A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCNGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 42 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 WHEREAS, on Aprii 20, i9&"s, the City Councii of the City of Nancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to mate and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and NHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said Cf ty a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemfzed costs and expenses o~said-work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby. oreliminarily aDDroved and confirmed. SECTION 2; That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and described-l-n said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sa ssessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received 6y said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Reonrt fnr t~p~~rnnca5 of ail 5i~hgugUont prn~99n.n95, and pursuant iC the proposes of strict. /~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation No. 42 for Tract No. 13425 SECTION I. Authoritt fcr Retort This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Div!ston 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of Califarnta (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintalred will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Mork to be provided for with the assessments estab115hed by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light Improvements on mayor streets (arterial and certain collector screecsi as snows on cne a gnsing uiscruc Ricas map wmen is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to ait areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per untt basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or deveiopment plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement an the individual development is hereby made apart of this report to the same extent as 1f said plans and specifics were d itached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subJect area. / / C~ SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. A11 improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of street light improvements on major streets for residential improvements (single family, multi-family, condominiums and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and institutional protects throughout the City. 1t has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the same benefit as tyro assessment units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Enerav Cost: No. of Lamps Lamps Annex New Lamp Lamp Size* YTD No. 42 Total otwuL aaa u aaa 4500E 500 13 513 16,000E 16 4 16 22,000E 4 0 4 27,500E 17 0 11 *High Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps Rate Mo's Mai nt. Cost 5800E 448 % S 8.93 X 12 f 46,007.68 9500E 513 % 510.16 X 12 = 62,544.96 16,000E 16 X f12.08 % 12 2,319.36 22,000E 4 X S13_B4 X 12 = 666,32 21,500 ii % fi5.3i x :2 • 3,123.24 Total Annual Mai nt. Cost f116,659.56 2. Total Assessment Units: YTO Assess Units before this annexation • 16,884 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 71 Total Assessment Units 16,955 /99 3. Cost Der Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost 5116 659.56 = f5.88/year/unit o. o n is n str ct Z6,`95~ Assessment shall apply to each tot or parcel as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Oiaaram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled 'Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1` Annexation No. 42. These dlagrems are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units rlthin the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Nhen units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events i. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2, City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines tD form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year 1n Ma,y, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. ~~~ EXHIBIT "A" Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 42 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 1: Assess. No. of Lamps to be Annexed Pre ect Pw-ease wit 3.mn~~anJD:~3;D0^L-2'1~.'OL-2T.3'~R,'L Zane 1 TR 13425 --- 71 --- 13 --- --- --- Zone 2 ~- a ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 z a w a 5~~~.~ ,. :~~\ •r' ~~ ;~ 3,~ 0 4 ~, ciT~r of aAxcao cvcAxoxae COUNTY OF 8AN BEBIVARDINO BTATE OF CALII+ORNU - ~ T ANNEXATION NO. 4 Z RESOLUTION N0. ~~ ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 42 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHT iNG ACT OF i972 AND OFFERING A 11ME AND PLACL FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE 8E IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Cade of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Description of Work: That the public interest and convenience require an i~ if~e ~e~i on of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2, Location of Nork: The foregoing described work is to be located witT iTi n roadway riway enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 42 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1". SECTION 3. Descri lion of Assessment District: That the contemplate w~ in t e oprm ono sae y ounce is of more than local or ordinary public 6enef it, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 42 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1" map< is nn files in thw nff ire ni thn !`i Yy !'le.L .~F said City. SECTIIXi 4. Re ort of En ineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. as approve t e report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the mnount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. ~~a3 RESOLUTION PAGE 2 SECTION 5. Collett ion of Assessments: The assessment shall be collecte ad t [>e mne ime an in t e same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in ,tune, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year wi]1 be determined. SECTiCii 6. iime and Piace of Hearin Notice is hereby given that on May 18-148'8, at t e our o pm n t e City Council CNambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not 6e formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which eath signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or 6e accompanied by written evidenee that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 1. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972: All the work herein Dropose s all a one an carr a rough n pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: PubiTShed notice shall be mace pursuant to ection o e overnment ode. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once 1n The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation pubiished in the City of Ontario, ~aT~Tti=ornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ~~ RESOLUTION N0. ~ ~ - a 3 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 27 TO STREET' LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2 SNEREAS, a;~ April 20, I9SR, the Ci?y Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as tailed for pursuant to said Act, which report has beer, presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor aqy part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLYED Dy the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o~sai-d-work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report De, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily ayprureu anti confirmee. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and desc~-fn said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land wt thin said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sa~dAssessment District 1n proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respecttvety, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report 1s hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engieeer's Report for t e purposes of ali subseouent ororeedings, and pursuanf to t!w prv"pGie'u uiitr iC i. as ~ CITY OF RANCFN) CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 Annexation No. 27 for Tract 13425 S'cCTiON 1. Authority for Renort This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, DTrision 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and L19hting Ack of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon ail lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on local streets as shown on the Lighting uistrxt a~tas map wm cn a on rile witn the city engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECT [ON 3. plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram far the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made apart of this resort to the ;ame exunt ac if cold plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activltles on the street lighting district Include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subtect area. ~Db SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs wT11 be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. Ail improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 Ts comprised of street iigh¢ improvements an loeai streets for residential improvements (single family only) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this District will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Enerav Cost: No. of Lamps Lamps Annex Neer Laxq L_yn Size* YTD No. 27 Total 5800E 1,292 22 1,314 9500E 4 0 4 *Hi gh Pressure Sodium Vapor local iotai ~nnuai Lamp Size Lamps Rate Mo's Mai nt. Cost 5800E 1,314 X f 8.93 X 12 f140,808.24 9500E 4 X f10.16 X 12 487.68 Total Annual Maint. Cost = f141,295.92 2. Total Assessment Units: VTD Assess Units before this annexation = 4,863 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 _ 11 Tetal Assessment Hni tc d,936 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cast 5141 295.92 528.64/year/unit o. o n is n str ct ~;'43d'~ Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. ~-b 7 SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled 'Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2", Annexation No. 27. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Irv,rovements for the Oistrict are found to be of general benefit tc ail units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Nhen units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and deterwlnes to fora a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a reoort with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modiries one approves one ineiviauai assessmencs. ~~ EXHIBIT °A' Properties and i~eprovements to 6e included rithin Annexation No. 27 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 2: Assess. No. of Lamps to be Annexed Pro ect Aerea a ~n_it a ra elfi u00e: 2~fi'uG1- i2~ TR 13425 --- 71 22 --- --- ___ ___ d-b~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.2 w w ~~ 0 U S,~`~_ ;^ CIT7f OF RANCSO CUCAI[ON(iA :.,_; ~• ,! COUNfY OF BAN BERNARDINO ` .3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Vi !~ im __ ~' N ANNEXATION NO. 2 7 RESOLUnDN No. ~~ 'a 3 ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 27 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AN"u LiGHiING AGi OF i972 AND DFrE RING A TiM'c AHO 'r LACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descri ti on of Mork: That the public interest and convenience~re an s mien ion of this City Council to fore a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Mork: The foregoing described work 1s to be located w t~1i n roadway r~-way enumerated 1n the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the orrice or the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 27 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2". SECTION 3. Descri Lion of Assessment District: That the contemplate wor in t e op n ono sa ty ounc is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expanse of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Rnnexation No. 27 to Street Lighting Matntenance District No. 2" mao5 SS nn fila in iha pff ire of thg f.74y rlnnk of Sdid Ia ty. SECT [ON 4. Re ort of En sneer: The City Council of said City by Resolution-No.~ias approve t e report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Matntenance Dfstrict No. 2" is on file to the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. ~~r RESOLUTION PAGE 2 SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected a t same t me an rn t e same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTIGN 6. Time and Pi ace of Hearin Notice is hereby given That on May 18,-f99!), at t e our o pm n Lie City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause wiry said work should not be done or carried out or wiry said district should not be famed 1n accordance wtth this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no ocher protests or o0.lecttans will De considered. If the signer of any protest 1s not sham upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landsca in and L1 htin Act of 1972: All the rrork herein propose s all e e a carr a rou n pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designoted the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Dtvistort 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be ma~uartt to ect on o e vernment ode. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Da~11 Re~or-t, a newspaper of general circulation published 1n the City of On art to, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ~~ --- C?TY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer dY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Bide i SUBJECT: Approval to Annex DR 86-43, located at the northeast corner of 8th Street and Baker, Avenue, to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No. 43 and to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 as Annexation No. 15 and setting the date of public hearing for May 18, 1988 RECONIENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving she Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 43 and Annexation No. 15 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention *_o annex the abeae described pro3ect to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and No. 6, respectively. Analysis/Background Attached for City Council approval are resolutions declaring the City's intent to annex DR 86-43, located at the northeast corner of 8th Street and Baker Avenue to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation 43 and to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 as Annexation No. 15 and setting the public hearing date for May 18, 1988. Also attached for Council consideration are resolutions giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Reports for the sub,l ect annexations. A letter from the developer requesting the subject annexations is on file in the Engineering Division. Respectf b t ed, RHM7"dAQ:dlw Attachments ~/3 RESOLUTION N0. ~ Yj '~3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 43 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 WHEREAS, on ADrii zO, i9u&, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any park thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the. itemized costs and expenses oi• stork and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby. oreliminari lv approved and confirmed. SECTION 2; That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descr~iie3in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment District in proportion to Lhe estimated benefit to he received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Rronrt fnr t~p~~rnnc ac of all ,ihengennt prC....eA~~yS, 3R'' pursuant td the proposed district. ~~Y CITY OF RANCND CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation No. 43 for DR 86-43 SECTION 1, Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTiOM 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operatin4 and servicing of street light improvements on maior streets (arterial and certain collector streets) as shown on the Lighting District Alt as Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3, Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the sub,)ect tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street t;gnt;ng {~r„yemenr on .he :,,niv;duy, develcr~~ent ',s hereby made apart of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities an the street lighting district include; the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the sub,)ect area. CIS SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessme.^.ts will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 has been demarcated into two zones. tone i is comprised of street light improvements on major skreets for residential improvements (single family, multi-family, condominiums and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and institutional projects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1, The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 is shown below: 1, S.C.E. Maintenance and Enerav Cost: amp Size* Lamps YTD No. of Lamps Annex No. 43 New Lamp Total 5800E 448 0 448 9500E 513 7 520 16,OODL 16 0 16 22,000E 4 0 4 27,500E 17 0 i7 *Nf gh Pressure Sodium Vapbr Total Total Annual Lam Size Lams Rate Mo's Mai nt. Cost 5800E 448 X E 8.93 X 12 = E 48,007,68 9500E 520 X E10.16 X 12 = 63,398.40 16, OOOL 16 X E12, 08 X 12 2,319.36 22 nnnL e X EI3.84 X 12 = 564.32 21,600 I7 X E15.31 X 12 = 3,123.24 Total Annual Main t, Cost E117,513,56 2, Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexat ion 16,884 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 = 5 Total Assessment Units 16,889 ~~ 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost = E11~1 513.56 = E6.96/year/unit No. o n sin s nc Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Rssessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1", annexation No. 43. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Nhen units are based on acreage, assessment will he 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1, City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and seas public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a Otstrict or abandon the Droceedings. 4, Every year in May, the City Engineer files a repot! with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. ~~i EXHIBIT "A" Properties and Tmprovements to 6e included within Annexation No. 43 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 1: Assess. No. of Lamps to he Annexed Project Acreage Uni c 53U l~ v5wl lo, u [, ~, ~u~u Zone 1 Zone 2 DR °6-43 ?.5 5 --- 7 --- --- --- ~~~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION NO. 4,3 ~,~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI[ONOA :~~= COUNTY OF 8AN BEBNA&DIIVO ` ~~ ~ STATE OF CALII-ORNIA t. $ Vi im __ n N RESOLUTION N0. pFi "~`Ib A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 43 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING Ai:O LSGHT ING ACi OF i9%c AKD OFFERING A TIMt AND PLAL't FOR HEARING OBU ECTiONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descri tion of Work: That the public interest and convenience reGuire an t s e n en ion of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located wriFrn roadway rig~T-o#-way enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the orrice or the ~,ty Lierx, entrtiea ^Annexation No. 43 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1". SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the co rt empla end word-, in~fnion of s-~d-~5 y ounce , is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed Co pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows; All that certain. territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included wfthin the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 43 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1" mans is on fila in the off;ro os the r:ry rlerk os Shcd l,lty. SECTION 4. Report of Engineer; The City Council of said City by Resolution N~Fas approve the report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment :ones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shail be collecte at a same t me an in t e same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Councii of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will he determined. SECTIOFI b. Time and Place of Hearin Notice is hereby given that on May i8~t t our o pm in t e City Council Chambers aL 9161 lase Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assess,•nent. district, may appear and show cause why said work shouid not be done or carrieE out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a descrfption of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City Drior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landsca in and L1 htin Act of 1972: All the work herein propo- s' e~sFall a one an carr a roug n pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and !ighLing Act of 1972, being Divtsion 15 of Lhe Streets and Htghways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Seit~fon o L e overnment ode. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, a: least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of On ar ot~T, a iio~nia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. RESOLUTION N0. ~ f(j '~ ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 15 TO STREET LIGHTING MASNTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 NPEREAS, on Aor;l ?O, lggg the City Cuuncil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing a5 called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, And finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any par*. thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE RE !T RESOLVED Dy the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as foilows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o~sa d-work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, prellminari lv aooroved anA rnns i.+~o~ SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and deser a in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3; That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sai-3-Assessment Oistrict in proportion to the estimated benefit to 6e received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for purposes of all subsequent proceedtnac, and pursuant to the A pr vYVieu dl]tf ll: l.. `JO~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 Annexation No. 15 for DR 86-43 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requi rements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Df vision 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972), SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light rm """~""-""`- -- ''-~' aL~eees as shown on cne Lighting District"Altas Mapywhich is on file with the City Engineer, Improvement maintenance is Considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unft basis. SECTION 3, Plans and Spectfications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stfpulated in the conditions of aDProval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subJect tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development {s hereby ,maw a Part of 'h;s "°"^.t to the sari: CxteflL as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto, Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject,area. _~?~~ SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction, All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based an actual cost data, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 is comprised of all industrial, Cnmmerci37 and '.^st+. tut tonal pra,jects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the sane benefit as two assessment units in residential zones. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 is shown below: 1, S.C.E. Maintenance and Enercv Cost• No. of Lamps Lamps Rnnex New Lamp Lamp Size* YTD NO 15 Total 5800E 47 --- 47 9500E 2 ___ 2 *High Pressure Sodium Vapor Lam Size Lamps Rate Mo's I oLaI Annum Mai nt. Cost 5800E 47 X f 8.93 X 12 = E5, 036.52 9500E 2 X 510.16 X 12 = 243.84 Total Annual Maint. Cost = 55,280.36 2, Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation = 439.5 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 5.0 total Assessment Units 444.5 7 i ncr n«o~.,,,,,,a ~ Total Annual Maintenance Cost E5. 511.88/year/unit No. o Un is n D str ct Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. ~a y SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled 'Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6", Annexation No. 15, These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment I"qr^ve:^enis far the District are found to be of general oenefit to a)1 units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Nhen units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2, City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Councii conducts public hearing, considers ail testimony and detennlnes to form a Distrlct or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with *.he City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and ~HM~~•<~, ~, muu ii tee and approves cne individual assessments. aas E%HiBiT "A" Properties and improvements to be included wi thfn Annexation No. 15 to Street Lf ghting Maintenance District 6; Assess. No, of Lam s to be Annexed Pn,iecr, acree~ T~ 5$B;'vL ;501--.~uC6L cc,uTi6L e~5~~ DR 66-43 2.5 5 --- --- --- --- --- a~6 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. b ANNEXATKDN NO. P5 ,~o"~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAYONOA w ~~ ; ~ COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO , a ~:~"~ :: '~" ,; STATE OF CALII~ORNIA v~~ ~ N RESOLUTION N0. 8 a '~ y~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEIfATI ON N0. 15 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING ANO L`OHTING ACT OF i972 ANO GFFER ING A I1 ME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE I7 RESOLVED by the City Council of the City cf Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1, Descri tien of Work: That the public interest and convenience requ re an s e n ent on of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Ranchc Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street rights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located wifFfn roadway r g -o -way enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are nn fits in rwa „f~{~~ ui ii!e icy ~Ierx, entitled "Annexation No. 15 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6". SECTION 3, Descri tion of Assessment District: That the contemplate wor in the opts ono sar y Dune s o more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which distract is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 15 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6" maps is on file in the nffirc cf .he City C'srk of paid City, SECTION 4, Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. * as approve the-e report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work, ~.~~a 8 toilette SEaTd~~sameColle~ctiarn ofn Asses smmnesmannere asssCountyt taxesl are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in ,Lune, at which time assessments far the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearing: Notice is hereby given that on May 18~991~-at t our pm n e City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho ~Cucaranga, any and ail persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which eacn signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972: All the work herefn propose s all oe Done and carried roug n pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Calffor nia. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intentfon: Published notice eFall 6.. 1_~_ w r~~.,..o.~~ ~~ .>ce.~iun Devoe or me uovernment Cade. The Mayor shalt signythis Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before ttR date set for the hearing, at least once in The Da11 Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of n ar o, a ornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. a.a y' - CITY OF RANCHO C1,'CAMONCA STAFF REPORT GATE: April 20, 1988 TD: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer eY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide ~$, ~~,, SUBJECT: Aoprov3l to Annex DR 86•?3, located at the hurt heaet corner of 8th Street and Baker Avenue, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 as Annexation No. 19 and setting the date of public hearing for May 18, 1988 RECDMENC11TI011: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 19 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described pro3ect to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3. Analysis/Background Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex DR do-43, located at the northeast corner of 8th Street and Baker Avenue, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 for Annexation No. 19 and setting the public hearing date for May 16, 1988. Also ,rr,.r„a p_.. Cc::cc+• - - ;;,,,, ;, a reeuiuiien giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's~Report for the subject annexation. A letter from the developer requesting the subject annexation is on file in the Engineering Division. Respec rul submitted, RHIII:~NS3f1_---' Attachment X30 RESOLUTION N0. ~ ~ - a U 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, Of PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANN E%ATION N0. 19 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 WHEREAS, ors April 20, 1900, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should 4e modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: that the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o sa work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby. preliminarily oNyi areu anu wniinnea. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descr a in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land 1n said Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for t-Tie purposes of all s~hsequent proceedings, and pursuant tc the prvpJieu' district. ~3/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 Annexation No. 19 for DR 86-43 SECT10li 1. Authorit, fc Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Li gh Ling Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Landscape Maintenance Distrlct No. 3. The City Council has detenaTned the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all the developments as mentioned above. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed developments are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right-of-way or easements to be granted t:o the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference Ts hereby made to the subject development plan and the assessment diayram I9r me exact wcacion or sne landscaped areas. the plans and specifications for landscaped Taprovement on the icdTVidual development Ts hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be Incurred by the District for parkway and median improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers and or/by the City. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it 1s estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (5.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. Landscape Maintenance Distrlct No. 3 has 62en demarcated into two zones. Zone i is comprised ofrarcei Nap %349, comprised of 8 parcels, total7ng 6,057 square feet. the district was formed in October 5, 1983, for the maintenance of landscaping a detention basin and storm drain within the protect. This zone will be assessed on per tot basis for the maintenance costs within the pro,{ect boundary only as stipulated in the Engineer's Report for the formation of the Distrlct. _l° Zone 2 is comprised of all other protects that are being annexed or will be annexed to this District. All lots or parcels within Zone 2 will be assessed on net acre basis for the maintenance of landscaped median islands on Haven Avenue from 4th Street to Deer Creek Channel, Foothill Boulevard and 4th Street from west to east City limit, Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue, from 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard, 6th Street from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue and median islands on other maior divided highways and some parkways within the Industrial Specific Plan Area and Foothill Boulevard overlay area. The estimated cost for Landscape Maintenance 0lstrict No. 3 including Annexation No. 19 is as follows. Zone 1 Existing District Total estimated maintenance cost 32,070 Assessment units 8 Total cast - assessment unit for year and month 520 5258.75/year or 521.56/mo./lot Zone 2 Existing Annexation New Distrlet No. 19 Total ~ u ~ maintenance area - Sq. Ft. 0 0 0 Assessment units, acres 380,632 2.5 380,634.5 Total cost + assessment unit for year and month 0 x 5.30 ~80Z~3d3-' = S 0/year 0/mo./acre Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this reonrr and ianninn =Lxnrbit Aa ~•• this ~, reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6, Assessment lotsiwithinmLhesDistrict andtthat assesosmenttshallobegequaliforneach parcel for Zone 1 and shall be equal to the next acreage for each lot or parcel in Zone 2. d- ~3 The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the 0lstrict or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with Lhe City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modtfies and approves the individual assessments. ~-3yy Properties and ingroveaients to be included within Annexation No. 19 (Zone 2) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3: PROPERTIES PROJECT ACREAGE DR 86-43 2,~ IMPROVEMENT AREAS TO 8E ANNEXED IN ANNEXATION N0. 1 Area S~t• Haven Avenue Foothill Boulevard Milliken Avenue 4th Street Rochester Avenue 6th Street a 3s ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 ANNEXATION N0. IQ ~~c ~ yin ¢io~ ~~ ~~'_ c~ ~+~ >- im TY OF RANCHO CUCA,~IONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION ' p VICINITY MAP 1\`!I RESOLUTION N0. 0 ~ ~ y T A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO WCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 19 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 A110 OFFERING A iiME AND -ri.ACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Description of_ Nork: That the public interest and convenience requ re an s e hen ion of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those parkways and facilfites thereon dedicated for common greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivfsion tract map within the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any sprinkler system, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental Lighting, structures, and walls in connection with said parkways. SECTION 2. Location of Nork: The foregoing described work is to ho iu~aleu w~cm n roaaway ri gnt-of-way and landscaping easements of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and mere particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 19 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3". SECT [ON 3. Descri tton of Assessment District: That the contemplate wor in t e op neon o sa y ounc is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga includee within the exterior boundary lines shown upon chat certain "Map of Annexation No. 19 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3" heretofore approved by the City Council of said City by Resolution No. *, indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within the proposed assessment district and which map is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. ~-3 7 RESOLUTION PAGE 2 SECTION 4. Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution N~ o. +~Fas approve t e report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "En9lneer's Report, Annexation No. 19, Landscape Maintenance District No. 3" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said re Dort is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected at t e same t fne~an inn t~ie~same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTIpI 6. Time and Place of Hearin Notice fs hereby given that on May 1r~7~168, at t our o n City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any ob,lections to the work ar extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be farmed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient Lo identify the same, and must be delivered to the Ctty Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or ob~ecttons will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of tho nrnnorry uexribed to cne protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landsca in and Li htin Act of 1972; A11 the work herein propose salt a ne an cart e t rang n pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1912, being Divisfon 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION B. Publication of Resolution of Intention; Published notice shall be made pursuan o ec on o e vernmen ode. The Mayor shall sign this Resatutton and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days befcre the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Dail Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of D^.*.ar,o, ~a ~~arria, and cirr:nlr{e~ in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ~~38 - CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: April 20, 1988 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FRDM: Brad 8~11~~, r'ty Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner y 9 c~CAMO~ < , C \iy o!p~ p F' V IZ .-., J> 19~ SUBJECT: VARIANCE 87-18 - HOME FEDERAL - The appeal of the Planning omm ss on s ec s on eny ng a request to allow the sign copy to include the word "ANYTIMETELLER" on two (2) new faces of existing wall signs, located at 9596 Base Line Road. I. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council el~~ lie appeal. II. BACKGROUND: At the regular meeting of February 10, 1988, the Planning ~C-amm si sion conducted a hearing on the Variance application. At that meeting, the Planning Commission determined that the proposed signs did not canfonn to the criteria of the Sign Ordinance and denied the request. The Sign Ordinance discourages extraneous information and the word "ANYTIMETELLER" was determined to be extraneous information as it advertises a service the bank provides, rather than simply serving as a III, ANALYSIS: The Sign Ordinance states "Sign copy shall include minimal, In'~'onnaEion only. The use of subordinate information such as telephone numbers, lists of products, pictures of products, etc. are discouraged, The name of the use or business shall be the dominant message on the sign". The Planning Commission's interpretation is that the word "ANYTIMETELLER" constitutes extraneous information and, therefore, could not support the Variance. The Planning Commission also stated that allowing this sign will seta precedent for all banking facilities in the City. The applicant's reason for requesting a variance to allow the word "ANYTIMETELLER" is to identify a service the bank pro~!1des, because not all Home Federal locations have automatic teller machi n?<, The applicant contends that the City ha; allowed This type of sign in the past. In order to grant a variance, it must be shown that extraordinary circumstances exist on the site which clearly dl5tingushes it from other property and validate the need fora variance, and thus, the inclusion of extranenous information. tY. STAFF COMMENTS: On rare occasions in the past, staff has allowed the us ne6-i ss name to include a list of products. This is based on the interpretation that a nationally registered trademark could De considered as the name of the business. Such is the case with Sizzler (Steak, ~3~ Seafood, Salad), Alpha Beta (Liquor), Thrifty (Liquor), and Mustc Plus (Compact Discs and Yideos). The Sizzler, Alpha Beta, and Thrifty signs were approved either prior to the incorporation of the City or prior to the adoption of the Sign Ordinance. In the case of the Music P1 us sign, Music Plus was considered a maior anchor tenant of the shopping center and, "Coap:ct Dtscs and Yi fleas' is a national ly registered trademark. With Home Federal, 'AWYTIMETELLER° mdy be a registered trademark, but they are not a ma,1or anchor tenant of the center. Copies of the February Planning Comtsslon staff report and minutes are included in this report your review. Respectf~uily su fitted, G, ; ~ ~ B d B' ~ City ann BB: T6:,) s Attachments: Appeal Letter, February 19, 1988 Planning Caawtssion Minutes, February 1D, 1988 iduu wy ~~IlMjb jUll ~Laii KeperL dn0 Resolution of Denial, February 10, 1988 ~~ ~Q.~.ea x.._. N 1'lY.pgr~~ ~ "e head eam.xrveeeima company" February 19, 1988 Ms. Beverly Authelei City Clerk CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONOA P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: variance H7-1B Home Federal Dear Ms. Authelei, ®EC[~81![~D CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA ADMINISTRFTION FFa ? z Isee ~B~dGl~se4~i8 6. a..;.~.a...E.s~ Please accept this letter and the enclosed check in the amount of $126.00 as our request to appeal the planning commieaion decision on variance 87-18 -- Home Federal. We feel our request is consistent with the ordinance and the surrounding environment and provides a service to the community. I£ you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (619) 562-4200. S~i n_cyerely, l~~ Curt A. Bauer Account Executive CAB/dmd enclosure a ~i :9~:9 Y.~Ee'1 n+,';6 a 1f 5 , . p 5eN'EE ~ o " = UF'^PNin 92C V+ 5~0~952 1200 '1]9C Ens' e~PC`~ Si S.a'E 2nn, BPE.1 Cep FpPMe 9252. 'J' qi 529 9996 AYES: COMMISSIONERS; EMERICK, TOLSTOY, BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the resolutions would be brought back to the 2/24;88 geeting as Consent Calendar itens. +*++~• --carried H. VARIANCE 87-18 - HOME FEDERAL - A request to allow the sign copy to y we a ter' on two i2) new faces of existing wailusigns, located at 9596 Base Line Road. Toy Grahn, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Vice Chairswn Chltiea opened the puD11c hearing. Mr. Curt A. Bauer, 10845 Nheatlands Avenue, Santee, representing the aDDllcant, addressed the issue of design of the sign anG stated this is a registered trademark. He pointed out that the sign ordinance states that signs arc for "public convenience" and aa7st be "compatible with adjacent land uses'. Mr. Bauer cited examples of other businesses with signs with supporting infottaatlon on them within the City. Commissioner ChitTea questioned if the sign was visible to traffic. rir, Dauer response the sign is vistDle only to west bound traffic and not readable from east bound traffic. Vice Chairman Chltiea closed the public hearing. Coxwissioner Blakestey stated he would not support the variance for the sign and upholds the sign ordinance of the City. Coimaissioner Emerick agreed with Col~issioner 8lakestey. Coawtssioner Tolstoy coneurred stating he did not want to set a precedence. Vice Chairman Chi ti ea stated that the signs Mr. Bauer referred to were signs that predate the sign ordinance 3.^.d pre=dato t!~ inccrperation of the City, Tnese are the very signs the Cow•iss{on 1s~ trying to discourage. Vice Chairatan Chltiea stated she strongly supports the current sign ordinance of the City. Commissioner Tolstoy awned to approve the denial of the variance, Comaissioner Biakestey seconded the motion. Motion carried by the fallowing vote: Planning Commission Minutes -7- February 10, 1988 ~~~ AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MLNIEL • ~ # r + --carried N£Y BDSINESS I. ENYIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEYELOPMENT REYIEN 87-59 - OELMAR - eve opsw:n o an o ce, sutnu ac ur ng a researc and deveiopaent facility totaling 56,923 square feet on 4.88 acres of land in the Industrial Park District, Subarea 6 of the Industrial Specific Plan, located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Center Avenue - APN: 210-381-9, 10, 11 and 210-391-16, 17, 18. Chris Nestswtn, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report and advised the Coswissian of a error on the resolution. Mr. western stated that on condition 1 finder Planning Division, the wor4 "incospleted' should be incorporated . Y1ce Chairsan Chi ii ea opened the public Nearing. Mr. Adrian Young, Vice President of Delwlar Enterprises, 8115 Rosebud clarffied that the owner of the ad,~acent parcel is not the wise ownership as the parcel in question. Mr. Young also addressed the request for the dedication stating that it is not consistent with iho va:: uerei~pwenc ro cne Nantno Cucaapnga easiness Park. Mr. Young asked for the consideration of consistency, H! also addressed the issue of in-lieu fees stating that none of the poles on Fourth Street are coveting down. Mr. Young indicated they wind rather pay the in-lieu fees rather than underground. The basis for the in-lieu fees is for the length of the oroperty being developed fror property line to property line. The property Tn question is 250 fact wide, and the center line of the adjacent street, which is Center Avenue, is 25 feet, which is a total of 275 feet. The basis for the reasonableness in allowing in-lieu fees to a developer is less than 300 feet and not underground adjacent. They are neither 300 feet nor adjacent. He requested the Coswisslan consider the requlretaent of undergrounding, Vice Chalrsrn Chitiea closed the public hearing. Vice Chairsrn Chi ti ea clarffied there are two issues t0 be discussed, the undergrounding condition and the right-of-way width standards. Comsissioner Esrrick stated he would support undergrounding and not fn- lfeu fees. He questioned Engineering why they re requiring undergrounding and not the fee since it 1s under 300 feet. Dlanning Cosssission Minutes -8- February 30, 1988 ~ y3 CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 10, 1988 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, Ct ry planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner CCGS1pN p `2p 9 ~/ / 1~.. ii \~ T `! ~ A Z -d ' 197 SOBJECT: YARIANCE 87-18 - HOME FEDERAL - A request to allow the s~-copy inc u e e wor s "ANYTIMETELLER" on two (2) new faces of existing wall signs, located at 9596 Base Line Road, I. ABSTRACT: The applicant submitted a Sign Permit Application to rep ace he copy of trro existing wall signs on the Home Federal building. Based upon previous decisions denying the placement of auf.omatic teller wall signs, staff did not accept the application. The applicant has subsequently requested a Variance from the Sign Ordinance for consideration by the Planning Commission to allow the placement cf these two signs. II. ANALYSIS: In reviewing the two proposed "ANYTIMETELLER' signs for v-T,r _., '"G recd Liie ayyi icant cildL per the GI Ly of Rancho Cucamonga~Sign~Ordinance the use of subordinate information, essentially advertising a service or product in conjunction with a business identification, is discouraged. The name of the use or business shall be the dominant message on the sign. The Sign Ordinance does contain provisions for alternative signage, these being "convenience" and "directional" signs. Convenience signs contain such words as "Restroams', "No Parking", "Entrance" or minor business identification for on-site directional purposes, while directional signs contain such wo~ r~s as "Enter", "Exit", "One Nay" or other symbols for the purpose of indicating m-site traffic directions. There are no limitations in terms of~ie nunleer and type of these signs, but signs that contain advertising, or products, snail not be considered a convenience sign, and -~ ~ ~~yrs shall not coniain any advertisi ny or tradename information. Neither sign may be larger than four square feet and no more than four feet in height. In consideratfcn of the request for a sign variance staff suggested the applicant use a convenience sign as a viable alternative to the wall sign, primarily because this type of sign could permit the requested information, The applicant felt this type of signage would not be adequate and requested to proceed with the Yarfance, ~. yy PLANNING CDAMISSION STAFF REPORT VA 87-18 - Home Fe sl February 10, 1988 Page 2 III. PRECEDENT: Three previous appeals before the Planning Coawission se prece ent for tonight's decision. All three appeals were requests to allow extraneous inforawtional wall signs and all three were subsequently dented. 1) In August, 1986, the Planning Commission reviewed an appeal from the Lucky Store in the Haven Village ShoDDin9 Center, to allow for an extraneous informational wall sign of "Dell, Liquor, Bakery'. The Planning Caaeission upheld the City Planner's decision and denied the appeal. 2) In November, 1986, the Planning Commission reviewed an appeal of Sign Penit 86-46 - Bank of America to allow the placement of two "Versateller' wall signs. The Planning Caaoission upheld the Ctty Planner's decision and denied the appeal. The reasons for dental included the number of existing signs and the size of the proposed wall signs. The Planning Coawission chose not to pursue an alternative type of sign. It was the decision of the Planning Commission that this sign would constitute advertising and there was a clear indication that the automatic tiller would be visible from the street, as is the case with the Nome Federal 'ANYT[METELLER". 3) In January, 1988, the Planning Co~issian reviewed an appeal frog The Nherehouse in the Cucamonga Village Shopping Center to allow for extraneous informational wall sign of "music, video and software". The Planning Coma15510n upheld the City Planner's decision and dented the appeal. The Planning Commission's decision will once again clarify this provision of the Sign Ordinance for both existing banking facilities and future development, in that, approval of these wall signs, as proposed, would set precedent for all banking facilities in the City. IV. OPTIONS: The following optf ons are provided for consideration by •T..~.... r,.~i..,.,.. - 1) Deny the Sign Variance as inconsistent with the intent of the Sign Ordinance and the Alpha Beta Center Uniform Sign Program. 2) Direct the applicant and staff to work together to formulate an alternative to the proposed sign that would satisfy the request of the applicant, Dut would also be ~/ S PLANNING COIMISSI01' rAFF REPORT VA 87-18 - Home Fe~_ a1 February 10, 1988 Page 3 consistent with the provisions of the Sign Ordinance and the Alpha Beta Center. A possible solution is a wall mounted convenience sign with 2 to 3 loch letters to be viewed on-site for the purpose of directing custaeers to ±F.e "ANYTSRL?ELLER". Thi> would be the approval of the sign facing the parking lot, as the other sign faces Base Line Road. 3) The Planning Coaalssion also has the option of approving Variance 87-18 as requested. However, the mandatory findings outlined in the attached Resolution would have to be made prior to approval. Y. RECOMM TiON: Staff recoaaends e ar nce rough the adoption espe ully su ted, .I'' ~ Brad Bu ler City Planner that the Planning Caaarlssion decry of the attached Resolution. BB:TG:vc Attachments: Letter of Appeal Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Elevations (Showing Proposed Signs) Exhibit "B" - Photographs Exhibit "E" - Locations of Resolution of Beni al Automatic Teller Machines ~ y~ ®~~ ~,.e~~~~Y YARIANCB APPLICATION HOME FEDERAL 9596 BASELINE WRITTEN JUSTIFICATION 1) ANYTIMETELLER is pact of Home Fedecel's corpocata id entity program, and in addition, is a reg iatared trademark. 2) Provides cuatomar service to inform cardholdaca that theca le an ATM machine on the premiaaa available. This is important ae not all Home Paderel branches have ANYTIMBTBLLBR machines. In this aenee, the eignage is irfccmational and dirmetlonai in natuce. ~y7 ~06A3 WMEATLAN09 AVE.. SUITE O, 64NTEE, CALIFORNIA 92071 ~6 t91562•a200 i'laP1r r~+- :vcxrrH ct~ of ITEM,: ~/k ~'--a RA:~iCHO CL~ytONG~ TITLE ~~~1 M~ _ PLAIVN{NG D{V510N EXHIBIT:_~_SC.1LE:~ y~ ~-- x ~ ~ z z '~ ~~ x ~~~ ~:r ~~ -~~ ~~ ~N~ 11 ~~ ~s~ ~~ G I O U ' --- --d h CITY OF R~-~:vCHO CUC:1.'NONGA PLANNING DIVLSI(~N ~: %~I\'G NOR'iH : fiE~1: ~A' y - IG TITLE ='~"~ ~~~_ EXHIBIT: ~ SCALES ~, .-' y~ T 1~ p~~SC1 C ~~~ Y Y~F pip ~,qF ~~ +7kk ~pp T U\zY 4 €~~ CITY (~' R~.'V'CHO CI;C-~~IOhGA PLAIVNI.VG DIVLSION i~f ~~ ~~ ~(((~ ~~ i irEM: Va ~t1- I C TmE: ~leva~'~cr~~, EXHIBIT: ~~ SCr\LE: ~.T.2~ 1 ~~ ~ ± ' fib VgtTH Cj~ ~ ITE11: _ YA' U1' RA.vCI-I~ CL'CA.tiIO1V(iA TITLE f,~~aw~ P[.AIVIYING IXVI5701V EXHIBIT: L2 SGLE~ •T 2s/ ,~." CITI' f~` R<-~tiC:Hp CI/Y:~~~K~;~3 rr~.~{: ~ - I~ TITLE { -'---~ E}CF{1BIT: ~__ SCALE: ~ 5 ~ -~"_, rt.n~tirvtNC; n~vtsxxv J_I .._ ~_ , ~ ~.a I : J : ~MNII~ MM~IMIICt~ CITY OF R~'~1CH0 CL'CA.~IOIV'(~1 PLANNING DIVLSpN V V VORi~H ITEM: ~/k ~~~ ~ ~> TIT7.E: ATM ~.-f1C~DtY~/~t~l ~i EXHIBIT ~' - SGLE~ ~°1_.. ~ 53 AurolATlc TELLEx LocAnaNs 1: po~ana First FMera1 Savings a Loar, NSK; of Base Line 8 Archibald 2. Hove Federal, N/S of Base Line, Nest of Archibald 3. Security pacific Bank, N/S of Base Line, Mest of ArchlDald 4. Foothill Independent Bank, SEC of Base Line 8 Archibald 5. 1st Trust Bank, NEC of 19th 8 Archibald 6. Greet Nestern Bank, NEC of 19th 8 Carnelian 7. First Interstate Bank, SEC of 19th i Carnelian 8. Bank of Merlca, NEC of Base L1ne 6 Carnelian 9. Ylneyard National Bank, NNC of Foothill 8 Kiuslaan 10. Bank of Aalerlca, SEC of Foothill 6 Archibald ~~. ncl ~a ror yV DDaF, JLb VI rUV LO 111 a NdY@n 12. Independence Bank, NEC of 6th 8 Naven ~ sy RESOLUTION H0. 88_28 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING VARIANCE N0. 87-18 TO ALLON THE SIGN COPY TO INCLUDE THE NORD 'ANYTIMETELLER' ON TNO (2) NEN FACES OF E7(ISTIN6 HALL SIGNS LOCATED AT 9596 BASE LINE ROAD IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISYRICT A. Recitals. (1) Integrated Sign Associates has filed an application for the issuance of the Yarlance No. 87-IB as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter 7n this Resolution, the subJect Yarlance request is referred to as "the application". (it) On February 10, 1988, the Planning Caawissian of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. Ii 11) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred, B. Resolution. NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, detenalned and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: I TAI. rnwwL.I n. ~.__~.. set forth in the Recitals,- Part A, of this IResol~uti on are~~true andUCOrrectaccs 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 10, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property Located at 9596 Base Line Road; and (b) The application proposes two sign faces with the words "HOME FEDERAL/ANYTIMETELLER" located (one each) on the south elevation and east elevation; and If 1 TFn Iun Nnn. 1...~_~ a~y~~" d~~ ~~..u.ea apprvnlmaieiy fifty-five 15bj feet from Base Line Road; and (d) The sign Ordinance states "sign copy shall include minimal information only. The use of subordinate information, advertising a service or product in con~unctian with a business identification, is dlscoura~ed, fie name of the use or business shall be the dominant message on the sign . ~S~ PLANNING COIMISSION RESOLUTION N0. VA 87-18 - Hale Federal February 30, 1988 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Coa~ission during the above-referenced publ7c hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this CooAission hereby finds and concludes that the following aKtndatory findings necessary to approve a Variance CAN NOT be awde: (a) That strict ^: literal interpretation and enforceaKnt of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the obJectives of the Sign Ordinance. (b) Thai there are exceptional or extraordinary circwastances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the saaw! district. (c) That strict or literal interpretation and enfarce~ent of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the soak district. (d) That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the li~itations on other nrnnerttoe rlas<tston in the soak district. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Coaaaission hereby denies the application sub,{ect to each and every condition set forth below. 5. The Deputy Secretary to this Coawission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1988. a~~ PLANNING COMM1SS10N OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. VA 87-18 - Have Federal February 10, 1988 Page 3 I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Cosisslon of the City of Rancho Cucaapnga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Coawission of the City of Rancho Cucaapnga, at a regular aeeting of the Planning CoaiaHsslon held on the 10th day of February, 1988, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK NOES: CQMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL S7 ---- CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Oate: April 20, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Dy: John L. Martin, Associate Civil Engineer SubJect: Approval of Environmental Assessment Initial Study and issuance ~, of Negative Declaration for the proposed 19th Street-Amethyst Street, Storm Drain and Street Reconstruction Protect, pursuant to the Envirormiental Quality Act ~ It is recommended that City Council approve the attached Resolution approving the Environmental Assessment Initial Study and issuance of a Negative Declaration for the proposed 19th Street-Amethyst Street, Stona Drain and Reconstruction Protect. BACKGRDDID/ANALYSIS• In compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State Guidelines, the Environmental Assessment Initial Study has been prepared to permit construction of the subiect pro,{ect. These improvements generally entail the widening of the streets, installation of storni drains, removal and replacement of the existing street pavement along Amethyst Street and pavement overlay along 19th Street, construction of curbs and gutters, sidewalks and drive approaches, as well as installation of street lights. The installation of a traffic signal shall be with this protect. Right-of-way for these proposed improvements exist along Amethyst Street and along the north side of 19th Street, being voluntarily dedicated 1n exchange for frontage improvements. Four properties remain to dedicate along the south side of 19th Street and may require eminent domain action. An easement for the storm drain installation does exist. tt is the Engineering Staff's finding that although the proposed proiect could have a sfgriflcant effect on the environment, it is concurrent with the General plan that 4methyst Stree*. a..^.d 19th Street be developod to the proposed widths, and that remaining right-of-way shall be acquired through a process provided 6y Cal trans to ensure compliance with State guidelines, and that mitigating measures to offset the environmetal impacts have been considered. ~ S CCSR Re: 19th Street-Amethyst Street Aprit 20, 1988 Page 2 Staff therefore requests that a Negative Declaration be granted to the pro,{ect. Respe y ltted, RHM:JL Attachment a 59 RESOLUTION N0. g ~ . ~//S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO116A, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED 19TH STREET -AMETHYST STREET RECONSTRUCTION AND STORM DRAIN PROJECT NHEREAS, the 19th Street-Aas?thyst Street Store Drain and Reconstructior. as a Public Rgcncy ProSect shall be subJect to cospiy rrith the California Environaental Quality Act necessary to protect, rehabilitate and enhance the environmental quality of the State; and WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment initial Study has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration all availabie Inputs and has reviered same concerning the proposed 19th Street-Ametgyst Street Protect. NOW, THEREFORE, DE [T RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1 The City Council of Lha City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approve the Envirormmntal Assessment Initial Study and issuance of a Negative Declaration far the proposed 19th Street-Amethyst Street Starve Drain and Reconstruction Pro,iect. Section 2 The City Clerk is directed to file a Notice of Determination pursuant to the California environmental Quality Act. ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NOTICE Complete environmental assessments have been prepared for the following prajectisi. The City Council will be considering these assessments, Staff's recomnendatton, and public input, at their meeting of April 20, 1988 prior to making a final environmental a erm na on. Following is a brief description and location of project and Staff's recommendation on the projectis) to be considered: TITLE: Environmental Assessment and Negative Declaration for the proposed 19th Street-Amethyst Street Reconstruction and Storm Drain Project. The project entails the widening of 19th Street, between 1000' ;west and 300' east of Amethyst intersection; Amethyst Street between 19th Street and 500' north. It is the intent to construct ultimate pavement width, curbs and gutters, sidewalk as well as street lights. Storm Oratn Installation per Master Plan of Drainage shall also be considered to solve storm water nuisance in the areas. STAFF RFr.OM!~NDATinNr Tt is wrnmmunAnA FFa• hM r{w r..,,n..n approve the Environmental Assessment and Issuance of~ Nemative Declaration for the proposed 19th Street-Amethyst Street Reconstruction and Storm Drain Project. A copy of the Environmental Assessment can be reviewed at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division offices located at 9330 Base Line Road, Suite 203, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Written comments should be addressed to the Engineering Division at the above address or phoned at (714) 989-1862. In addition, concerns can be addressed Tn TnY I1TV 1'n l,nnil nn hlinl.. •• •A.. ...4i..- l.t yvv~.w~,, u „ ~111y 411,E pfLYi VUOIy mentioned. The meeting will begin at 7:00 P.Mc, and shall take place at the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. Appendix B ~Y~ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION INITIAL STUDY -PART I GENERAL For all pro,lects reCUiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Rev tow Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Planning Of vision staff will prepare Part II of the initial Study and make recommendations to Planning Camalssion. The Planning Commission will make one of three determinations: (1) The protect will have no significant environmental Impact and a Negative Declaration will be fi]ed, (2) The pro,l ect will have a sign ifteant env tronmental lmpacL and an Environmental Impact ReDOrt will 6e prepared, or (3) An additional information report should De supplied by tM applicant giving further information concerning the proDOSed project. Date Filed: April 20 1988 Pro,~ect Title: AmGthv~+ - i9th Street Reconstruction and Storm Drain Applicant's Name, Address, Telephone: City of Rancho Cucamonga _ a ~~~ noaa Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91730 Name, Address, Telephone of Person To Re Contacted Concerning this Pro~eet: Caron V Aara dr. Civil Engineer - same as above (714) 989-1862 Location of Pro,leet: 19 t1i Street (Rte. 30j 1000' west to 300' east of Ame thiyst Street Intersection, Assessor's Paree} No.: o„h,;~ cr rrrr list other permits necessary from local, regional, statt and federal annnrles and the a;e.^.cy issui.^,'y such permits: Caltrans Encroachment Permit, Temporary Street Closure and Construction Permit from the City of Rancho Cucamonga ~~a PROJECT DESCRIPTION proposed use or proposed project: An ultimate widenino of the existing street - - - - -++- g to + lion of concrete pia vement curbs and nutters sidewalk street lights and storm drain structures. Acreage of project area and square footage of existing and proposed buildings, if dny: N/A a t Lipp of Existing Street Describe the environmental setttn of the project site Including information on topography, so stn y, pants (trees), land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding praperttes, and the description of any existing structures and their use (attach necessary sheets): The~re~e<o~ Amethvst and 19th Street Project lies in n busy collector ,. ~,,.,,e~ +.,,r ~, ~o~;nantix l/civic /community. as well as commercial areas within Amethyst Averme, and senior citizen's care home on the west sloe. ine re also Foothill Freeway, with approximately 3U0' of right-of-way. IC will cross over Amethyst Avenue wit a near y in erc ange o e c [s the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative act tons, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact This is one of the Capital Improvement Projects of the City to be constructed in conformance with Raster Plan Storm Drain and the Street circulation Element of the General Plan. a (~ 3 4ILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? ~ 2. Create a substantial change !n existing noise of produce vibration or glare? _ ~ 3. Lreate a substantial Change in demand for manic lpal services (police, fire, water', swage, etc.ji 4. Create changes in Che existing Zoning or General Plan des ignations7 5. Remove any existing trees? How manyT 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, f lammab les or exp losives7 Explanation of any YES answer above (attach additional sheets if necessary): n installation of the ultimate street section will cause some excavation work on the existing stree siou ers. 21 a row of Eucal votus Trees fall within the right-of-way which will have to 6e removed to aliow for the construction of the new street facilities. ~. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this oroierr .~. yeiim nie ucily: ii/N ' 8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips 9qener~>be(d daily by this pro,iect:_ Amethyst - 5 000. 19th St. - lr 000 oT 9. Estimate the amount of gra4ing (cutting and filling) required for this pro~ec t, in cubic yards: 1355 Cy. Cut 10. If the protect involves the aanstruction of residential units, calglete the form on the nett page. CERTIFIGTIOII: ! hereby certify that the statements furntihed above and in fnitiaiteval~a4t~~b*tsrpresent the data and information required for this o beat Of mY dbiiif V. enA rh» •~.. s..,- _~_. ____.. and inforaation presented are true and correct to the best of~my~knowiedgenand belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made Dy the Planning Division. Date: horn 2G 1988 g ~ ~` Title Gideon V. Agra .lr fivil nain r a~U RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid the school district in assessing their ability to accommodate the Droposed residential development. Developers are reQuired to secure letters tram the school district for ac^~s:~dati;g the increased number of students prior to issuance of building Dermits. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No. Specific Location oP Pro,~ect: PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family chits: 3. Date proposed to beoin cnn<fn~riinn• __ 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Modell and I of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Ranoe ~~~ CITY OP RANCHO CCCA)SONGA PART II - INITIAL SIL'DY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DATE: Ao ril 20. 190II APPLICA.\T: Citv of Rancho Cucamonoa FILING DATE: LOC NUIWER: PROJECT: Amath vct_l0th ctrrat Rnrnnat r~rtinn a A ctnr 0 PROJECT LOCATION: 7gtk ar a t t innn' t t 700' t of th thyme Intersection and Amethyst from 19th Street to 500' north. I. E:1VIR0\T¢NTAL IlRACTS (Explanation of all "yn" and "maybe" answers era required on attached sheets). YES HAYHE Np 1. Solla and Ceolo¢y. WL11 the proposal have aignif Scant results Ln: a. Unat able ground cond Scions or in changes Sn geologic relac ionshlpe7 X b. 0ls rapt Lona, displacemanta, compaction or burial of the soil? X e. Change in topography or ground surface contoue inteevala? z d. The deatrue tlon, rousting or modlfieation o! any unique geologic or phyaieal features? z_ e. My pocartcial increase in wind os water 4rG:1Gr. of aaii._. a_i_'i.•r,... .i rh.• n .aG _____..o __...__ -.^. or -_- site condltons? ~ z f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposit ion? _ z g. Ezoosure of people or property eo geo to git hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground Lailure, or similar hararda? _~ x_ h. M increase Ln the race o[ extraction and/or uaa of any mineral reaouree? .IL 2. Nvd rolo¢y. Will the proposal have a1gn1[lcant results in: ,~ (P~ a. Changes in Curren [s, or the course of direction of (loving streams, clears, or ephemeral scream channalst 6. Changes in absorb Clon races, drainage patterns, or the rat• and amount of surf acs eater runoff? c. Al cerat ions to eh• coura• or floe of flood va tera? , d. Change Sn the aawwe of surface vacer in any body of eater? •. DSacharga Into surface va tsrs, or any alceracicn of surface eater quality? f. Alteration of groundvacer eharactariselcst g. Change Sn cha quantity of groundvatara, either through direct additions or vith- dravala, or through Snurfarand with an aquifart Quaiicy7 Quantity? F TM. ~A.. •1.. In a. .l _ •l~ vlsasavailabl• for public-vacer suppllast 1. Exposure of people or property to voter related haiards such as flooding or aeichea? 3. Air Quality. Nill the proposal have aignlflcant rasul cs Sa: a. Constant or periodic air smfas ions tram mob11• or indirect soureast Statlonaq aoureut b. Da tasiorat ion o[ amb lent air quality and/os interEaraeu v1[h the attainmen4 4t app l3Sahle air gwllty standards? c. Alteration of local or regional climatic coodltiona, affec cl ng air mowmmc, mo is coca or tempera carat 4. Biota Flora. V111 chs proposal have sign Sflcant results Sn: ~~~ •. Change Sn cha eharaeeerlscics o[ species, lnelud ing diversity, die erlbucfon, or number s __ _' ~ ?3je ~ YES u4YBE :;0 x x x x _ x x 1L _ x _ ~ x x L x c. Introdut[ion of nev or dlarupclvs apacl ea of Floats Snto an area? d. Radueeion Sn the poeantial for agticulcursl production? Fa_na. 4111 eM proposal 'haw algnif Sean[ maul ea in: s. Change is cha characcariatica of spaciaa, inoluding diversity, distribution, or nvmbna of any aDeelas of anlmalsT b. Raducclon of eha aumbara of anY unlgw, rare or aadangarsd apacin of animtisT c. Introduction of oev or dlaruptlw spaeiaa of animals Lnto an area, oz raaule in a barrier to the mlgracion or mvanaat of aalnala4 d. Dacarioracion os remval o! exisela~ lSah or vlldlife habicseT S. Population. 4111 the proposal have aigaltieanc results 1n: a. 4111 eha proposal altar cha loeatlom, diatrl- bucion, density, dlvardty, or groveh rtu of cha human populacioa of as areal b. 4111 cha preposal attact exUeing howing, or creac^ a demand for addlcional howiogT 6. Soc io-Economic Factors. Will the proposal have a igniiicanc rasulta ia: a. Chanp in Iocal or raglonal soeio-etonoaic eharatueiaeics, Lacludieg asoeoaie or cosmereLl divszaiey, tax rata, and property valwal b. {till Drolaet costs bt equitably dLtzibuted among pro~acc band lelaries, L •., bugers, tax o~y.ra or Drateee ve!ra? 7. Land Ua• and Planning Considerations. 4111 eha proposal have aignlt Stan[ results in? a. A aubscanclal al ura cion of the prnent or planned land use of an area? b. A eonfllee vich any dasignatlons, ob~eetlvsa, polleiea, or adopted plena o[ any governmental sncltias? c. An SmDact upon the qulaiey or quantity o[ exit eing eoneumpcive or non-consumptive Pd22 YES :..lYO° `;0 _ x x __ 1L .._.. ..-~_ 1L ~_ JL s_ ~ _ x x x x x 7a3e YES !'AYSE v0 8. Tranaoortatfon. Yill the proposal have significant sasul ca in: •. Caneraclon of aubacantial additional vehicular movasaat? ~ _ _ b. Fffeees oo exlaclnx streets, or demand for nav atnee conseruetient ~ _ e. FfteeG on exiteinx ptrkinx faeillelu, or denand for nev parking? ~ d. SubKancfal fxpacc upon exitcini eraneposae- [SOO gscml x •. Alceraclona to pruaae patums of circula- tion oz eoveatnc of people tad/or foodat ~ _ ~ [. Aluratione to or etteen oe prganc and potential wcaz-boma, rail, wa craaaic or air crattict _ , _ ~ ~. Incrusts Sn czdfle hazards to a»eor vehieUt, b[egellab or pedgeriana? _ ~ _ x 9. Cul tural Fuouraa. 8111 the propoul haw •i;nitlcuc tuulct in: a. A dlscurbanc• eo cM lnte~ricy of arthaeolo`Scal, palaoatolo~ieal, and/or his torieal resaurdu? _ x 10. Nulch. Sa[ety. and Nulsanc• yaccors. Will the proposal have aixnlticanc retulto in: a. Cnacion of any hulch hauzd or poUneial health hazerdt _ __ x b. ysposure o! people to potential health hasarde? ~ __ x e. A risk of explosion or reluu o[ huardow eubetaoeu in eha wane of an accident? _ _ _ ~ d. M tntrmas0 Sn tht nuebes o[ f[Idivldwla or epeclu of vector os pachanopnic orpaitst or eha expow» of people co such or`anisue? _ r_ x •. Inonu• in exist inp noise lwels? _ ~_ _ t. Exposure of people co pocencsally den`eroua noise Lvals? x ~. fie creation o[ ob~teclonabls odors? _ x h. M increase in 11aht or claret ~~o ~ ~ _ 2s;e 5 11. Aesthatlcs. VS11 eh• proposal have •Sgnitltanc results in: a. The obatruceion or degradation of inq acanic vlaca or vlev? b. The caatlon of so ancheclcally offensive site? c. A conflict with the oblecelve of designated or potenclal scenic corridors? 12. Ut 111t1es and Pu611c Sezvico. Aill tF.• propose; have a signitiunc need or nev ryeceme, os alteractona eo the tolloving: a. gleecric paver? b. Natural or packapd gu7 e. Co'unicationa gatesm7 d. Water supplq? a. Waatavater taeilitles? f. Flood control eeruccures7 g. Solid vuu fare l.!..? h. Fire protest ion? 1. Police ptotection7 s. Schools? k. ParW or other reetuclomal lacillties7 I. 7lafntenamca of publle facillciee, ineluding roads and flood control Lacilltin? ~. Other governmental eervicu? 13. ZnaEev and SCart: n.bdurcea. VLll the proposal have signif lcaoc neulca Sn: a. Vs• of subacan tial or axcua ri•e foes ar energy? D. Subrtantial insreasa in dmand upon exi~eing ecnrnaa of energF? e. M inensaa Sn eha demand !or davelopmanc of nev sources of energy? ~> 7 Q d. M increase or perpetwtlon of cha consumption of non-nnevable forma of energy, when taaaible ranevable wureas of energy are availableT Y55 :AY3E NO x x x '~L' _ x e .Y ~ ~_ _ 1 ~L_ _ x x x x x x -~ Y _ ~ x _ x pa:e 5 Yf5 :J1Y9f NO •. Subecantial depletion of any nonranevaDle ar scarce natural resource? ~ ~ ld, N+ndators Flndlnae of Sien!ltcanca. a. Does cde proieet have the potential ca dearada the gwliry of the enalroiroenc, avbacancially reduu thr T.abl:at of fish or vildllfe spaeiee, eawe a find or vi1d11te population to drop bQov ml! auetainla~ lovele, edrmim ee ellminite • plant or anlsal coeaamiry, raduw the avsber er aatriee cM rmp of a rtre or mdmpred plmt or miwl ev mllainau tapottme esuplm of the aalor periods of Gllforota history or pra6LtorFT ~ ~ b. Dom the psol eet dove the potmcLl co acdleva abort-tan. ee eM dieadvmeaq oY loe{gun, eavlroaaarocal podaT (A ahext-een Lpaee oa cde emrlronnaat L ens vhled oeenra in a relaelvely brief, dafiotcive period o! eir vbile loas- ten Lpaeta will endure veil lato tba future). ~ ~~ ~ c. Dma the pro~ecc Nava Lpmu vhieb era individually llrtited, buC ewulativelf eoaalderablaT (CUSUlatlval~ aonsidazaDle cans chat tda laerasemcsl efface of m S~LGv1.w/ yropct are comldeeable when vtevad Sn eonnaeeion vieh the efface of pmt profecta, and pcebable fueuze pro~acta). x d. Dom the protect have mvitoewneal eifeeea vhtch will eves aubecantlal adverse elfeeu on huaan betnp, dtdar dinetlp or lediraeely? _ ~ x II. DISCV5520N 0! ENPIROtaQ111'y, NALUA220N (S.a., o! affl2matlve ansvezs eo cha above queseiona plw a dlseumion of proposed nitl`aclon measures). See Attached Sheets gage III. DETERYINATYDN On the basis o[ chi! initial evalweioD: ^ I find the Dropoaed prof etc COULD NOT haw a aiQnificant of fact on the snviroomenc, and a NEWTIVE DELLIRATION will be prepare4. I find that al cbou~h the OroDOSed ptol eet could Mvs • aiQnificanc stfaet on the aevlro~menc, than will not Da • c!`nifitanc of Eecc !o this case beeause eha sitlption waurea deaeribad on an aceaehed eheec Nava bsan added to cha pro~eec. A NEGATIVE DECU1tATIDN NIL; EE fEEP ar . L F1nd the Droposed Dro~ecc NAY Aaw • eijnilScanc e[feet on the a anvir~ant, and an ENVIRONlffNiT L~ACI REPDEi~ia required. Dau ADri1 2U, 19b8 re ~~" ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS l.b.e The widening of the existing street section to its ultimate width for the improvements to be installed such as asphalt concrete pavement, will require excavation to the roadway shoulders. Parkways shall be graded to accomodate the sidewalk installation. Re*_aining wall shall be proride6 to sections where there exists a considerable grade differential. le. Seven of the existing eucalyptus tree windbreak falls within the ultimate roadway and right-of-way will have to be removed. A subsequent 19th Street Deuatiflcation Project will follow for replanting and landscaping along the reach of 19th Street from Nest City Limit to Naven. 2.b.c Properties fronting 19th Street and Amethyst Street, within the reach of the project are relatively unimproved, Dirt driveways show ditching because of rrorth-south runoff drain. Nh11e most of the water runoff is carried thru the street and empties to the existing stores drain line east of Amethyst, big storm runoff tend to follow a natural course towards the low south properties, A new stone drain wilt be installed 1n the street to pick up concentrated flows from the westerly end of the project and will transmit such through the new stores drain connecting to an -"~-`~^y °~~~~~ v~L~ ~rwsing tyLn JLreeL at 3U0' east of Amethyst. The construction widening of a new street section and construction of concrete driveways will eliminate ponding on the street and runoff towards the lower properties at the south side of 14th Street. 8a. The widening of the street as a public street will legalize much of the existing usage of this section of the street for vehicular and pedestrian traffic. The current width of 19th Street is ,just sufficient for two-way traffic without enough room for other cars to turn left or right. The ravelled and atligatored pavement along Amethyst Street are also in a worse stage of deterioration, needing replacement. Widening of the street and opening such to formal public usage and improving the riding surface and removal of flood nuisance will invariably make the street more attractive for usage projecting a higher density of traffic. a ~3 86. Developments immediately east of this protect have recently started construction causing such to widen an ultimate street section. Other narrow sections of 19th Street fora proposed widening are: Beryl t0 Hellman, Hellman to 300' west of Amethyst, and Hermosa to Cartilla. Each individual widening of portions of 19th Street pushes this street towards being a through secondary east-west busy street frca west Cify limit to Haven Avenue. 8e. The opening and widening of this reach of 19th Street and Amethyst Street is anticipated to attract nerthside traffic presently detouring along Archibald Avenue and Highland Avenue. 10e. The presence of construction equipment during construction will increase the noise level in the area fora temporary period of time. The protected increase 1n ADT due to the continuous develoipment growth shall add to the existing noise level. However, the Installation of traffic signals to 6e coordinated with this protect, wilt control the seooth movement of vehicies. This will minimize the frequent deceleration and acceleration of passing vehicies because of the existing 4-way stop sign. 12.a,g. Electric power and telecommunication poles and overhead lines occupy a location about 21' offset in front of the ultimate location of curb and gutter. It is currently proposed to relocate such facilities behind the curb and gutter leaving Lhe lines in an overhead condition. 12d. Some water meters along the street will have to be relocated by virtue of the reconstruction. Anew irrigation system to service the tree well knockout are provided for future Landscaping. 12f. The installation of drainage facilities for the Master Plan Stonm Drain shall be coordinated with the street construction. Catch basins and the proposed piece of store drain shall be installed 1n place prior to paving. The flood control structure shall serve to redirect storm water flow underground from its surface flow. 121. The pavements will be completely replaced and overlayed, relieving the need for pavement repairs for several years. New curbs and gutters and additional street pavement are added to 'the street system for additional maintenance 1n the future. a~~ nrmv nc~ n ~ unvn nrrn w w,rnwTn ~ STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1988 Tb: Mayor and M=n&ers of the City Council FROM: Brad Butler; City planner L~.,....~V 'G` 7 ~' '' ~, F ICI ~ ~ U` 19ii BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87-41 - appea o e ann ng omn ss on s ec s on eny ng the development of a school district facility consisting of a 10,500 square foot administration office, a 16,075 square foot warehouse building, and a 15,600 square foot transportation/amTntenance building on 5.25 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of Beryi Street, south of 19th Street - APN: 202-041-01 and 42. Associated with the development is a Tree Removal Permit requesting the removal of three (3) mature treex. (Continued from January 20, 1988) -• ~~ (o.:Jn~M:nuD LilaL HI15 1[em U2 COnLlnUed LO Lhe ~~meetln9. II. BACKGROUND: On January 20, 1988, at the request of the applicant, ~Ci'ty Eauncil tonttnued the above-referenced item. The applicant is requesting an additional 90 day continuance (see atWChed letter) Rfully s fitted, Bra~er City Planner MR•lN•Yn Attachment: Letter of Continuance From Applicant ass Alta Loma School District 9350~F Baugne BoaE • Poet Ofllce Box 370 • Alta Loma, Callfom49170t • 7U/%7~076f Estabhshea 1885 April 13, 1988 C~,\ ~~ i~,ry?f.°26tG %f ~ ~OOq N~` Mr. Scott Murphy Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Scott, BorJ H twba III 6WAIaM t~s eatoo~ OfALY u,. M1Nr1a OEIE MlalWA IERmTl1 Roernr w. tvgernn wam .wxn a ,rutwrnY sQ.,ti~~ae. s.,.uY m rr e=.a I received a copy of the Notice of Public Hearing regarding the Alta Loma School District request for a Conditional Use Permit scheduled for Wednesday, April 20, 1988. ~...~~~., .~~~~~ ~ ~~.....o°y , ryuw~ 0 3v-siay wntinuan~e un tors matter. Thank you, Sincerely, oho E. McMurtry Superintendent JEM/cdm a~~ N1LLY SiRNn p[,NV R EIIFiELP 3rM'Y tIF130r1 MauatoM 5arvne. RnonM/ggA Va,wmW S,rltn Buwea.S,rMa•, ~imv nc n n wr~un rr rn n n.rnwrr_ n __ Lv ..~V •G, 9 STAFF REPORT ~ z • L~r ~ 'I2 L> GATE: April 20, 1988 ~ i9%%~ T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: L. J. Henderson, Senior Planner BY: Miki Bratt, Associate Planner SUBJECT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION - FISCAL e a op on o e na a amen o ammun y actives, project selection, and environmental determination for 1988-89 fiscal year based on an anticipated grant of (417,000, as well as reprogramming f121,700 of additional available funds. I. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the a c e eso ution approving the Final Statement of Community Objectives and selecting projects for funding in fiscal year 1988- a9. II. BACKGROUND: On March 16, 1988, the City Council held a public ~~~ Ate _ ~ti- --.._..-.:~:i'~ ~~a C~t~:'.: •~. _ _ y Development Biock Grant program and to set priorities amongNali the objectives suggested by City staff, community organizations and residents for funding in 1988-89. The list of proposed projects totaling (575,300 fn relation to an anticipated grant of (417,000 and the Preliminary Statement of Community Objectives was the basis for that discussion and the following recommendations: o Continue the Residential RehabllTtation Grant and Loan program with funding for 1988-89 to come from the reprogramming of unexpended prior year's funds; o Continue funding for the Senior Shared Housing Program, (56,300); O YIIOI~ \TYG~f ITpF~l~omont+ tr °..oathwesY vnga `"' ~'" /'.• ...n IV1 /11 e1lI UY Vejar, Placida Court, and Sierra Madre Avenue north of Arrow Highway. The total (369,000 cost will come from the 1988-89 grant (5327,300) and from reprogramming of unexpended prior years' funds (541,700); o Continue to contract with Lhe Inland Mediation Board for fair housing services; X77 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT COBG APPLICATION - FISCAL YEAR 1988-89 April 20, 1988 Page 2 o Reaffirm the adopted Relocation Policy; o Determine that operation of COBG protects in the 100 year flood plain is the best alternative and that adequate mitigation measures have been incorporated in each; o Approve reprogramming of additional needed funds for 1988-89 programs from unexpended prior years funds: (80,000 for housing rehabilitation from unexpended prior year funds for housing rehabilitation and 241,700 for Southwest Cucamonga streets from unexpended prior year funds for administration and other completed programs; and The following list of protects and the amount of funding from the anticipated 1988-89 grant for each program recommended by the City Council is as follows: a. Housing Rehabilitation no new funding b. Senior Shared Housing S 6,300 .. SN Cucamonga Street Improvements: Design and construction of improvements Avenida Yetar, Pl aci da Court and Sierra Madre _ .~... ~~ua. ~. V~ ~n~ V. nl l VY 1~VY 1rC JG/,JVU d. Program A6ninistration (including Fair Housing) 83,400 Totai anticipated funding E417,000 III. ANALYSIS: At this meeting, City Council will review the pre m nary selections and adopt a final list of protects for funding. At this time, Community Services staff 1s reviewing the VIP request for expansion of the Neighborhood Center and has indicated that they will come back to the Council at a later date. Council requested additional Information from Concerned Citizens about their emergency food and shelter program. Staff followed up with a phone call and a letter requesting the !nfo,°^.ation tree Exhibit "A"), but at the time of ibis report no additional information had been received. Council approval of the attached Resolution will adopt the Finai Statement of Community Obtectives and make a final selection of protects for fiscal year 1988-84. The attached Resolution will also reprogram unexpended prior year funds needed for the approved protects and programs, as well as complete the necessary environmental determinations. ~~~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CDBG APPLICATION - FISCAL YEAR 1988-89 April 20, 1988 Page 3 Once the Final Statement is approved, it must be submitted for environmental and state and regional clearinghouse review. Then the Statement and any comments received from the public or the clearinghouse will be submitted to 4U0 together with the 1988-89 funding application. Notice of the public hearing on the Final Statement of Commmity Obtectives and on the Final Selection of Protects was published and posted on April 8, 1988. IY. ENYIRONMENTAL: Staff has completed an environmental review. None o e a ore protects or programs will have a significant adverse effect on the environment and adeQuate mitigation measures for potential impacts have been incorporated into protects as necessary. a. Southwest Cucamonga Streets is partially located in the 100 year flood plain but alternatives have Deen considered, potential adverse effects will be mitigated, a finding should be made of no significant impact on the environment, and a Negative Declaration should be filed. b. Housing Rehabilitation is a continuation of a multi- year protect and a mitigated negative declaration is - ~.,_ c. Senior Shared Noosing and Fair Housing are categorically exempt under Federal and State law. V. SUMMARY: Following a public hearing, approval Ts recommended of ~Fe~ nal Statement of Community Obtectives and Final Selection of Protects for fiscal year 1488-89. Rye(~s/pec~tfu7l(~/l~y~ s~ub~m~i t~ted, L. J. Henderson \GI1~I,Y Vi i,ln nn LH:MB:te Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Staff to Concerned Citizens of March 25, 1988 Staff Report of March 16, 1988 Revolution of Approval ~~ / ~t~: }~ ~ ~ CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA ewe oma m. nm. a.,,m c...9w,n. cd;rom~. 911)0. Ilia 9891851 v j ~ ~/ ~ ~~~ y~ ~~ ~ ~( 1~ ~~~~~ March 25, 1988 i~(N ubl .: ; ~~'- lb~'1 ~x,,:- ~M ~,~.~~- r ~ iii ;~. , N1111am and Sandra Swam `i (~~~ ~ VVb~ Concerned Citizens Comprehenstve Assistance Program 6964 Shamrock Lane Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91701 SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR BLOCK GRANT FUNDING 1988-89 Dear Mr. and Mrs Swain: At the request of City Council at the public hearing Por the preliminary selection of protects, more information 1s needed 1n support of your application. If you have 1t, please provide an address for your office. You may need to check with the Planning Department to be sure the office 1s located 1n the appropriate development zone. Also provide the record of the accospllshments of your organization for the past year. Your annual report to United Mqy/FFMA m/ght be adequate if it Includes your actual exoenditures for the year. rnunrll was particularly interested in the number of individuals served, what kind of assistance was given, and whether Lhey were residents of Rancho Cucamonga. In order to continue this application the lnfonaatlon must be received to the Planning Department 6y 5 p.m. March 30, 2988. If you have any questions, please call M1k1 Bratt at (714)989-1861. Sincerely. - - .. _- - - ------ ~-- --- - COFEIUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING~~DIVISION ~//~ol~.~~v' v'C rry Henderson Senior Planner cc: M1k1 Bratt LH:Js D Ik1 P~nm•I Seim Ch. L E$ 6 e it ~ ~ 8~a a {{ y8 c 0 ~ I a a ryry ~c. ~ B - ^ t k o(. ! ~ ~ . . c nE m z a o a( f 1 y b ~ ¢ {: ~~ tnU u d Z ~ Q F 1/ 5 ~ \ E i L C C ^ 4 ~ EE a g y~ ~ o m~ ^' C N ~ t T j 3 V V ~ _ - NY pN e e ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ y ~ S ~^ ~ ~ ~q ~ ~ ~ ' I ~' ~ yl y~ ~a~ ~ ~ ~ @ g WN E ct tit~o E ~ .~ g ~~ ~ 3 ~~ i^^ ~~~~~ ~Sd ~ - va F ~ r ~ ~~ MT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: March lE, 1988 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Larry Henderson. Senior Planner BY: Miki Bratt, Assistant Planner •~ G~~'~0,1, `C C9 ~i ~ .. A f-6 ~ ^Z i9n I SUBJECT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION FISCAL YEAR e a op on o e e m nary a emen o ommun y jectives for the fiscal year 1988-89 and preliminary selection of projects based on an anticipated grant of 6417,000 I. RECOlMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Cauncll adopt the a ace eso u ion resulting in the following actions: o Adopt the preliminary statement of community objectives, o Assess flood plain impacts and consider alternatives to proposed projects located in the base flood plain, n of fi.w !Fo aAnn~nA ..ni n.+~+..~ ....i +.... ..• o Make a preliminary selection of projects for funding, II. ABSTRACT: Jn accordance with HUD requirements, staff has prepared e re iminary Statement of Cammmity Objectives for Fiscal Year 1988-89 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. The City has received proposals for eight programs/projects fora total cost of 6575,300.00. Based on an anticipated block grant of (417,000.00 approximately 6333,600.00 will be available for project funding and 683,400.00 reserved for program managmenet, future projects and efforts to further fair housing. Staff recommends projects which will exceed the amount of the 1988-89 grant and proposes to reprogram unexpended prior year's 81ock Grant funds to make up the difference. Reprogramming actions will De submitted along with the Final Statement of Community Objectives and selection of projects at the April 20, 1988 meeting of the City Council. At tonight's meeting, the City Council is asked to make a preliminary selection of those projects which most closely correspon3- o common y nee s. ~~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: CDBG GRANT APP FOR 1988-89 March 16, 1988 Page 2 The proposed protects described in detail in the attached Preliminary Statement of Community ObJect{ves are summarized in the Background section and evaluated in the Analysis section. In addition, the City's policies on relocation assistance for those affected by Block Grant funded activities, and on flood hazard protection for rehabilitation of homes in the flood plain are included, as required by HUO. III. BACKGROUND: The City of Rancho Cucamonga has participated in the 'CDBO program since 1982 as an entitlement city. Each year the City has prepared an application to the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to secure funding for specffic protects and programs which further specified federal and local goals and obJecttves. Until fiscal year 1987-88, the focus of public improvements was the North Town neighborhood. Protects were selected and funded in order to support the efforts of neighborhood residents to upgrade the appearance and functioning of the area. A11 of the motor protects have been completed or are nearing completion. Beginning in 198i-88, the City Council shified the focus of the public improvements to the Southwest Cucamonga neighborhood. City departments have cooperated in the identification of a public 1mm n! in f6n wJ~il• !.. w4.• C_1._.._J J_ •L Town. _.. _., __. . _. _.._ _. __ _....._. ._ ..._. ......,..... ,., ..,.r... C08G funds are allocated to local Jurisdictions based on a formula which considers the City population, Tnstance of poverty and instance of overcrowding in the City. For fiscal year 1988-89, Rancho Cucamonga has been . allocated an estimated 5417,000. Approximately 583,400 of this will be reserved for program administration, including the required fair housing services, leaving 2333,600 for protects. Federal regulations specify that protects and activities which are selected for funding must meet certain eligibility criteria which are summarized below: n arc a_riy~rv miyct no ^d ^°t !" ,. 2!y^hbCrhGCd 'fisting predominantly of persons of~~low- and moderate-income and provide services for such persons. In Rancho Cucamonga, only the North Tawn and Southwest Cucamonga neighborhoods and one street fn Alta Loma qualify under this provision. o The activity must involve facilities designed for use predominantly by persons of low- and moderate-income. a~ a CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: CDBG GRANT APP FOR 1988-89 March 16, 1988 Page 3 o The activity must involve employment of persons, a majority of whom are persons of low- and moderate-income. o Conditions of slum and blight must be reduced or eliminated. Based on these guidelines, the Planning Division solicited proposals for projects to be funded under the CDB6 program. Eight projects were submitted by City staff and community agencies. Each pro,{ect is described be]ow. In the Malysis section, staff has evaluated these projects on the basis of federal regulations and the Preliminary Statement of Camwnity Objectives. The projects are: 1. Housing Rehabiittatlon: Continuation of a housing reTiabiTi'~a on pafi rogr~hat offers below markot interest rate loans and deferred loans, to tower income persons or families, and have improvement grants for minor repairs to senior citizens and disabled or handicapped persons. Activities funded include outreach/public information, home improvement loans and emergency repair grants (senior citizens and disabled only). During the 1987-88 fiscal year, 25 seniors have used fie emergency repair grants, one household has received a home improvement loan and approximately 16 applications are pending. RamaetaA iunAi nn• wn nor fnnAlnn inn mef 2. Senior 9iared Nousing: This is an ongoing program providing a mac ng serv ce ar those who w15h to share their home with senior citizens 1n need of housing. The project is eligible under block grant regulations since it serves primarily lower income residents. The level of participation, so far, has been limited. Twenty-seven people have been counseled (15 providers and 12 seekers of housing) leading to match-up of two persons. fie counseling service is beneficial for seniors in helping them to explore the options for independent living. Requested Funding; 56,300.00 3. Southwest Cucamonga Street Improvements for Avenida Velar: ~5~. <~ nro .ec reeaae rueST'a~'fTi-o~ra`nPe ,~,nn construction of concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks; and upgrading of water and sewer lines as needed to meet health and safety standards. Both design and construction are proposed for 1988-89 (see Exhibit No. 2). Requesting Funding: 5167,000.00 ~r3 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: CDBG GRANT APP FOR 1988-89 March 16, 1988 Page 4 4. Southwest Cucamon a Street I rovements for Sierra Madre Avenue an ac a our s pro ec nvo ves pavemen r a a on• cons ruction of concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks; and upgrading of water and sewer lines where necessary on Sierra Madre Avenue north of Arrow Route and on Piacida Court. Design and construction phases are proposed for funding in 1988-89 (see Exhibit No, 1). Requested Funding; f202,000.00 5. Ewer ency Social Services for the Homeless: In response to the rogues or proposa s or pro ec s or the funding year, Concerned Citizens for Community Improvement has requested funding to provide a comprehensive emergency service program, including food, clothing, shelter, counseling and referrals for the Nest Valley area. Funds are requested to match funds from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) aAainistered by United May. Requested Funding: (8,000.00 6. Senior Dental Health Service: In response to the newspaper a ver semen announc ng a availab111ty of funds, the County of San Bernardino Department of Public Health has requested funds to operate a oropram to PAuratP cantor rtti ,P~e nP t'~1P importance of dental health and Leath them to care for their teeth and dentures, as well as to provide indivtduai counseling and referrals. Requested Funding: f5,600.00 7. Neighborhood Center Expansion: The VIP Club requests enclosure of an ex~ nfT g paflo aaE'LFe Neighborhood Center to provide additional space for operation of programs for senior citizens year round. Requested Funding: f85,000.00 8. F~~air NousinJ Inland Mediation Board proposes to continue to pr^.-~C d r HOpsi na .icrYiteS to furthAr fair nnncinn aii Block Grant recipients are required to provide fair housing services. Requested Funding: (8,657.00 9. San Bernardino Count Cammunit Nousin Resource Board, Inc.: e n ernar no puny ommun y pus ng esource oard, Inc. has submitted a proposal for fair housing Information services. The program would include pubitc education workshops ~sy CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: CDBG GRANT APP FOR 1988-89 March 16, 1988 Page 5 and seminars with clients Hilo are statistically noted as persons likely to be discriminated against, as well as advertising and marketing efforts. Requested Funding: 518,000.00 IV. RELOCATION ASSISTANCE POLICY: In addition to the preliminary se ec ono pro ec s, a eral regulations require affirnmtion of federal relocations assistance policy. None of the Droposed protects will involve aco~uisition of right-of-way or the displacement of residents or businesses. However, in the event that displacement should occur, provisions for relocation assistance will be made in conformance with the City's adopted relocation policy and the requirements of state and federal law. V. FLOOD HAZARD PROTECTION: Federal regulations also require adoption 0 0o zone po c es. Although asst of the water courses in the City have been channelized Lo reduce flood hazards, there are same areas which are potentially sub,~ect to flooding in a 100.year flood (see Exhibit No. 2l. There are residential structures within the floodplatn which would be eligible for participation in the rehabilitation program if the owners meet the income requirements. Also, same of the streets 1n Southwest Cucamonga are in the 100. and 500.year flood plain. CDBG regulations require the Citv to develop nnliN ac aAAre<ci oo r~.+c ,..,.Li ~. Housing Rehabilitation: In accordance with Executive Order 11988, oil od p alT management, staff considered alternatives to rehabilitation of housing in the flood hazard areas and found them impractical or undesirable. One alternative would be to exclude residential units in these areas from the rehabilitation program and encourage the conversion of these areas to other uses. This would not guarantee that the use would change and also low-income residents of the properties would not have the option of financing necessary repairs of their units. As a result, they would be more likely to live in substandard conditions. Relocation of residents and removal of the units from the flood hazard area is not a reasonable alternative. In addition, the ldentiffed fi0ed hd2dru' arPTC enrrvnpacc a mix of •e`idential public, commercial and industrial uses. Removal of the residential use would neither remove the danger of flood damage and injury nor return the flood area to its natural state. Therefore, the City has determined that rehabilitation of the units in the flood hazard area is the oast practical and desirable alternative. In order to mitigate flood hazard impacts for any units which are rehahilitated under the program, the County of San Bernardino requires that owners of properties located in flood hazard areas ~bS CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: CDBG GRANT APV FOR 1988-89 March 16, 1988 Page 6 show evidence of federal flood insurance coverage before their loans are funded. This requirement applies to all loans in Rancho Cucamonga. Southwest Cucamonga Streets: Staff also considered alternatives to pr°`ov~'ding pu--'-b'T'i<mpi roren~ents in areas of Southwest Cucaoonga located in identified flood hazard areas. One alternative would be to exclude flood hazard areas from the public improvements, an6 encourage these areas to transition to other uses. Since the entire area is developed with single-family homes and has been for over 20 years, it is not likely that the area will transition to uses more compatible with the flood plain. Mother alternative would be to include storm drains in the street improvements. Since the primary flood flop is north to south along Grove Avenue and outside the target area, it is not eligible for Block Grant funding. Local storm drains could improve drainage of the target area, but in general, the cost of storm drains is too high to be funded through Block Grants. Also, the installation of local laterals, in the absence of a main drain, could increase flooding downstream. VI. ANALYSIS: In considering protect funding for fiscal year 1988-89, s~aff~Fas reviewed each of the proposals on the basis of al{ni hility nn Aar hl nr4 nrant rn{fnnla <fafu< ae an n nni n~ n obligated program/protect and protect priority in terms Hof need within the City. 1. Housing Rehabilitation: This high priority program should be con't°inue usus nom- g~nded funds from prior years. Expenditure levels lagged in the first years of the program, but have averaged (80,000 a year in recent years. Reprogramming of (80,000 from prior year funding is recommended. 2. Senior Shared Housing: participation in this program is Tncreasi-ng roth ugh-outreach efforts by the applicant. Continued funding at the current year level of f8, 300 is recommended. 3. Su uthwest C.u Eamon del Street Tmnrnvcmenfc*nr Eyeni da tioian• s an e o ow ng em are con nua an o e program or improvement in the Southwest Cucamonga target area adopted by the City Council in 1987. Funding for design and construction of Avenida Velar is recommended in the amount of (167,000. 4. Southwest Cucamon a Street Improvements for Sierra Madre and aPi ciao Cour un ng or end consiruc on o errs a re an acids Court is recomcended in the amount of (202,000. ~~ S ~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: CDBG GRANT APP FOR 1988-89 March 16, 1988 Page 7 Emergency Social Services for the Homeless: Because of events such a~os~ name, am y spu es and changes in family status, persons and families in Rancho Cucamonga need emergency social servlces. Concerned Citizens for Community Improvement provides emergency services in the Nest End of San Bernardino County and has received Federal Emergency Management Act grants for homeless programs in the West End since 1985. They have applied for Block Grant Funding in previous years. The applicants and principle directors of the organization, William and Sandra Swain, live in Rancho Cucamonga. Concerned Citizens also operates homeless food and shelter programs in the City of Los Angeles. For part of the past year local services for the homeless were provided by Concerned Citizens at an office 1n the First Baptist Church, 9875 Archibald Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, but currently the organization does not have a location within the City. Although State law and federal Block Grant regulations encourage local support for homeless programs, staff does not recommend funding until a new local office is obtained. 6. Senior Dental Health Service: An infornml pole of seniors at P A n A Pn v nnnA MAa• nnJ ~n~ _ e.. --~ - - .. fir. interest in an an-site rdental hygiene program, but--did not favor a dental education program. Staff recammmnds that the applicant meet with Seniors at the Neighborhood Center and develop a proposal for the 1989-90 funding year which is supported by the seniors. 7. Neighborhood Center Ex ansion: The YIP Club presented a pe-tft of ri con a n ng 3' names of seniors active at the Neighborhood Center with this request. Although the Comminlty servlces Department supports the concept, not enough information 1s available to recommend the protect at this time. Staff will investtgate and if the pro,{ect is feasible, submit a proposal far funding in 1989-90. o. Fair- HuUSii~G u~rvicac• inland Mediation Board. IMB has provided Fair Housing Services n co unc on w e Black Grant program since 1982. IMB provides fair housing services, including mediation of landlord tenant disputes and discrimination counseling, as weit as information and education to further fair housing. Fair Housing education efforts include ca~mnunlty workshops and courses for realtors and landlords as well as appearances on focal radio and television stations, especially spanl5h 1 ~ 7 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: CDBG GRANT APP FOR 1988-89 March 16, 1988 Page 8 language programs. During 1987, IMB assisted with the relocation of residents of the labor camp on Arrow Highway. Staff recommends continuation of fueling in the amount of 18,657.00. San Bernardino Count Communit Housin Resource Board, Irc. is proposa s m e uca ono services ur er fair housing and would supplement the existing fair housing program. For the most part, the educational services would duplicate the educational services being provided by Inland Mediation Board. The cost woulA be more than twice as high as the full service fair housing program offered by Inland Mediation and therefore, this proposal is nct recommended for funding. In summary, staff recommends the foilowing protects and Drogram5 for funding out of the City's 1988-89 Community Development Block Grant award which is anticipated to be 1417,000.00, as well as from unexpended prior year Block Grant funding: a. Senior Shared Housing S 6,300.00 b. Southwest Cucamonga Street 369,000.00 Improvements c. Program Administration 74,743.00 Fai~yd'sing 8,657.00 Total 1458,700.00 Larry enderso T~ Sent Planne L H:MB:kO Attachments: Exhibit No. 1 - Southwest Cucamonga Streets Exhibit No. 2 - Flood Plain Map Exhibit No. 3 _ preliminary Statement of Community ObJectlves Resolution FS ~~ ' f ~ (-~ O ~`~ ~~~ ..~.. RCCA OUAIGTpp F011 CDfp FUNDf Nfm[o fTN[er IM-IIOV[M[NTf IY-IIOV[YlNT AUTNOIIIZlD IN /f09-1Nt ® IYFIIOV[MlMT IIlCOYYEND[D f011 lflf-Iff• CITY OF' r SOUTHWEST CUCAMONOA ITEM: :NORTH RA.'VC'IIO CUC~,NO1V('iA T,~: SrREE7 IMPRCVEn,1tNr PI.AIV:VIVG DIVLS70IV EXHIBff 1 SCALE: /vr„1;~ 2~9 _ 100 YEAR FLOOD ROUNDRY CI1"Y OF' RANCHO CUCA1~10NC~ PLANNING IJIVLSION v NOR"iH PI'EM: TITLE: =~OOC CNANNEL EXHIBIT ~ SG1LE: NONE ago _._. _. _._._._. _._.~ r-.~ ~.~.~._._. _._.~ i _. _. _.~ i ~~ l.. RESOLUTION N0. v ~ ~ ~ S R A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF COIMUNITY OBJECTIVES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1988-1989 AND PRELIMINARY SELECTION OF PROJECTS BASED ON AN ANTICIPATED GRANT OF 5417,000 NHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is an Entitlement City under the regulations governing the Comunity Development Block Grant Program; and NHEREAS, notice of availability of funds far eligible protects was published in The Da11y Report, posted in the target area, as well as public places City-wide and awn ed to interested groups; and NHEREAS, the City staff has received proposals far protects and programs from various organizations in the community; and NHEREAS, the City Council has held a legally noticed public hearing Tn order to give the public an opportunity to respond to staff recommendations for program funding and to put forth for Council consideration recommendations of their own; and NHEREAS, the City Council has Aeard public testimony and received all public input regarding the City's Community Development Black Grant Program fcr the next program year. NON, THEREFORE, BE tT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamnnea does herehv take the fnl lrwinn arts nnc• 1. Determine that operation of the Housing Rehabilitation program in the flood plain is the most practical and desirable of the alternatives, and the proposed mitigation measures are sufficient. 2. Determine that improvements for street in Southwest Cucamonga which are 1n the flood plain, are the most practical and desirable of the alternatives, and that proposed mitigation measures are sufficient. 3. If relocation of households or businesses is necessary as the result of the Community Development Block Grant Program, the adopted relocation policy in compliance with state and federal reaulatic~s .111 Ge fall owed. 4. Preliminary selection of the following protects and programs to be funded out of the City's 1988-89 Community pevelopment Block Grant award which is anticipated to be ;417,000. The balance will be reprogrammed from unexpended prior year funds. a. Senior Shared Housing ; 6,300.00 b. SN Cucamonga Street Improvements 369,000.00 c. Program Administration 74,743.00 Fair Housing 8,657.00 ~~~~ RESOLUTION N0. ~ 0 ' ~ ~{IP A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING THE FINAL STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES AND SELEC?ING PROJECTS FOR FUNDING FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 1980-89 WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is an Entitlement City under the regulations governing the Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, notice of the avat1ab111ty of funds for eligible protects was published in the Dally Report and mailed to interested community groups; and WHEREAS, the City staff has received oroposals for protects and programs from various organizations Tn the community; and NHEREAS, the City Council has held a legally noticed public hearing on the Preliminary Statement of Community Obtectives and preliminary protect selections on March 16, 1988 1n order to give the public an opportunity to respond to staff recommendations for program funding and to put forth for Council consideration recommendations of their own; and WHEREAS, the City Council has held a legally soiicited public hearing on the Final Statement of Community ObJecttves and final selection of protects on Apr11 20, 1988; and WHEREAS, the City Council has heard Dublic testimony and received all public input regarding the City's Community Development Block Granl• Program for the next program year. NOW. THEREFORE. BE iT RESOLVED: than. rno riry r~~,~~ri ~s +tie r~,y ..s Rancho Cucamonga does hereby take the following actions: 1. Approve the Final Statement of Commmnity Obtectives and Community Development and Housing Plan, 2. Select for funding the following protects and programs to 6e funded ouL of the, City's Community Development Block Grant award: Protect/Program Amrount a. Housing Rehab111tation no new funding b. Senior Shared Housing f 6,300 ... SW Cucamonga Street ;~FOY@alenL4i ^ Design and construction of improvements Avenida Velar, Placida Court and Sierra Madre Avenue north of Arrow Route 327,300 d. Program AAninistration (including Fair Housing) 83,400 TOTAL E417,000 ~~~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. CDBG PROGRAM -FISCAL YEAR 1988-89 April 20, 1988 Page 2 3. Authorize Mayor to sign the application for Community Development Biock Grant funds included in the Final Statement of Community Ob,jectlves, 4. Direct staff to reprogram unexpended prior year funds to the following projects: a. Housing Rehabilitation (funds to be reprogrammed from unexpended prior years allocations for housing rehabilitation) S 80,000 b. Southwest Cucamonga Street Improvements (additional needed to complete above street projects from unexpended pprior years from adminlstrative allocations and other completed programs) 41,700 TOTAL f121,700 5. Determine that operation of these programs and protects will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment and that adequate mitigation measures for potential impacts have been incorporated in each project. 6. Direct staff to file a Notice of Determination and Finding of No Signiflcan4 Impact for the program and its component projects. ~- ~i 3 CITY OF RAA'CHO CUCAMONG9 STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1988 ~` T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner BY: Miki Bratt, Associate Planner SUBJECT: COMMUNITY DEYELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT REPROGRAMMING 3300,000 AVAILABLE FUNDS - Consideration of reprogramming of funds from store drain construction to improvement of the North Tewn park site located on Feron Boulevard west of Turner Avenue. I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached reso u on reprogramming 3300,000 of Cowwntty Development Block Grant funds from storm drain improveeents for Turner Avenue to site development for North Town Park, located on Feron Boulevard west of Turner Avenue. II. BACKGROUND: The 5300,000 was originally allocated to acquisition a~eTopment of a park in the North Town target area. Development was delayed because of flooding problems in the area and on the park site. The U,S. Department of Housing and Urban Development urged the City tc spend the COBG funds quickly to comply with the federal requirement for timely expenditure of funds. Therefore, the money was reprogrammed to the storm drain project with the understanding that city funds which would have gone to the storm drain would then be contributed toward park development. Because the HUD budget process time schedule could not be met the project application Block Grant funds will not be used for the storm drain project. Storm drain contingency funds are sufficient to pay for the amount allocated from Block Grant funding. III. ANAYLSIS: The 5300,000 in Block Grant funds must be allocated to an~>?°r project. At this *_ime ^_esig,^. for the Horth Tow^ park has been completed and the project will be ready to go out to bid as soon as the storm drain facilities are completed. Therefore, it is appropriate and timely to reprogram the 33DD,DDD back to North Town park development. Community Services has completed design of the park and estimates a total of f550,000 will be needed to construct the park wfth 3150,000 additional funds from a State Grant and the remainder from Park Development Funds. A environmental assessment has been completed and adoption of a mitigated negative declaration is recommended. Mitigation measures are needed for flooding, noise and light and glare. Flooding will be mitigated by the installation of the stores drain which is in process. Moise levels caused try the 3d„acent rail traffic will be attenuated. Lighting will be focused within the site. Since the park site is within the 100 year flood plain the federal eight step flood plain review process is being followed, including early notice of protect consideration, as well as consideration of alternatives. Many neighborhood meetings were held to discuss alternatives 4efore the present site was selected for final consideration. Additional neighborhood meetings were held to determine the type of development. The early notice of consideration of reprogramming Block Grant funds far the North town Park site development was published on March 18, 1988. Notice of public hearing was published and posted on April 8, 1988. IV. SUMMART: Following a Public Hearing approval is recommaended of tTie afEached resolution reprograweing f300,00tl of available funds to the development of the North Town Park site. The resolution also finds that all potential adverse impacts have been adequately mitigated and a finding of no s/gnificant impact on the environment _~La .'. situ t.ic u. ~. iKpm ia~euL of iiuusiay a11u u!'Vail Development`~and a mitigated Negative Declaration under the California Environmental puallty Act should be prepared. Respectfully submitted, arry Henderson Senior Planner LH:M9:,is Attachment: Exhibit "A' ~~S -...._._...~.L- ~~J~'~ 00 r~ ~,., PA~PK S/TE ~ u u NORTHTOWN Areas qualifying for using CDBG funds for improvement NOaPH CI~ ~ ~,~: RANCHO CLKAMONC,A TITLE: ~' BCC ,~~PaoU~~nl y PLANNING DIVL510N EXHt9IT:~SCpLE:_NTS RESOLUTION N0. ~ ~ - ~ U 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPROGRAMIING 5300,000 OF AVAILABLE COM~RINITY DEVELOPNENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS TO NORTH TONN PARK DEYELDPMENT. NHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga operates a Community Development Block Grant Program in compliance with the regulations established by the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; and MHEREAS, ;300,000 of Biotk Grant funding is available for reprogramming ; NHEREAS, the ;300,000 was previously allocated to development of the North Town park site; NHEREAS; an environmental assessment has been prepared with a finding of no significant impact on the environment under the National Environmental Policy Act and a mitigated Negative Declaration under the California Environmental Quality Act; MHEREAS, the Ctty Council has held a duly noticed public hearing to receive public input on the use of these funds; NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Ctty Council of the City of narlCitU WGa1rl0ngd, l.a llTOrnld 00es nereoy LaKe the 1pllOwi ng aCtiOns: 1. Determine that development of the park in the flood plain is the only reasonable alternative and that all potential adverse impacts of the protect have been adequately mitigated. 2. Direct staff to file a Notice of Determination and Finding of no significant impact for the protect under the National Environmental Policy Act. 3. Direct staff to prepare a mitigated Negative Declaration under the California EnvironmN!ntai Quality Act. g. Approve the reprogramming of ;300,000 in CDBG funds from the Turner Avenue Stonn Drain to the North Park Protect. 5. Direct staff to transmit lnformultton on this reprogramming to staff at the Department of Housing and Urban Development. ~` ..,, „ STAFF REPORT ~' " 9. ~^ III 8 !~z - a DATE: April 20, 1988 ien TU: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: nrad dui ier, City Planner eY: Richard L. Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor SUBJECT: MINI CIPAL CODE AMENDMENT - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - n n o ap ers an an repea o ap er 10,68 of the Municipal Code pertaining to the parking of oversize vehicles and trailers on Cit,,v streets allowing improved enforcement by Sheriff's Department and C14y Code Enforcement Officers I. RECOAMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve n n to the Parking Ordinance allowing improved enforcement ability and thus reducing the number of semi-tractors, trailers, and large commerc{al vehicles parked on City streets, 1I. BACKGROUND: As a result of direction from the City Council, staff ega~n f~preparation of a Dorking ordinance amendment. Though initially aimed at proM bi tf ng trailer parking wf thin Lhe industrial area, it became evident that major revisions to vehicle parking regulations would be needed to achieve that goal. The resulting project resulted in three major objectives: 1. Consistency with the California Yehicle Code and the authority granted to municipalities. 2. Optimum enforcement ability with the use of minimum numbers of signs. 3. Consistent application of regulations to all City streets. Mnnlirg fhn Se nhj g_4ivng rnq~i Fwd mono ox4cnciyn reYiSi On than originally requested. The end result, however, provides an enforceable and flexible amendment regulating the parking of oversize vehicles and unattached trailers. t11. ANALYSIS: Current Municipal Code provisions prohibit the parking o~-f'-commercial vehicles over 3 tons on City streets in residential and commercial districts. Parking restrictions in the industrial areas for ltrge commercial vehicles and trailers do not exist. The enforcement of current Code would require the placement of ~ ~I g CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Amendment to Chapters 10.52 and 10.64 and Repeal of Chapter 10.68 of the Municipal Code April 20, 1988 Page 2 signs in order to be effective and to comply with the California Vehicle Code. Such signs have not been used within the City except in specific locations, or problem spots in residential areas. The widespread use of signs in conjunction with current Code is not a viable enforcement program as it would not deal with the various aspects of the actual parking problem; i.e. storage of commercial trucks, semi-trailers and oversize vehicles on City streets. Size and Weight Limitations: The proposed amendment incorporates severs i eTf renE par nk3 g criteria and utilizes to the fullest the authority granted cities by the California Vehicle Code. Amended Section 10.52.050 sets a 10,000 pound weight limit on commercial vehicles in residential districts as granted by the Vehicle Code (22501.5VC) and may be enforced with minimal use of signs. This general regulation is augmented with specific limitations on ail vehicles over 80 inches in width; and over one and one-half tons in residential dtstricts, or over three tons in commercial /industrial dtstricts. With minimum sign placement at the City Nmits, and at entrances to residential or commercial/industrl al areas, the enforcement of these parking regulations can deal effectively with a wide variety of vehicle types and specific parking problems. Unattached Trailers: Since the parking and storage of unattached rai ers was a ey ssue, a separate section was created to deal specifically with this problem. The amended Section 10.52.060 prohibits the parking of unattached trailers on City Streets unless actively involved in work or loading ac ti vittes. Minimum sign placement will be used to permit general enforcement, while key areas could be more thoroughly posted, permitting tow-away for violations. Tow-Away Provisions: The tow-away aspect of enforcement is prided-{i o gfi-tFe amended Section 10.52.080. This penalty section also derives direct authority from the Vehicle Code. Tow- away of fllegally parked vehicles requires the use of additional signs to ensure proper notice. The inclusion of tow-away prn yi ei nne nnu~rv_c the e1TPinati O.^. Cf parkin^y Yt C13 tTCns. This method is especially applicable to repeat violators and specific problem areas. Penalty Provisfons: The repeal of Section 10,68 is needed to el'im na con cling penalty provisions within the Parking Ordinance. This change a15o complies with the Vehicle Code requirement for Superior Courts to adopt a Uniform Bail Schedule. Penalty provlsions for parking violations are no longer set by each City, but rather by the Superior Court of the County. ~~9 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Awe~aent to Chapters 10.52 and 10.64 and Repeal of Chapter 10.68 of the Municipal Code April 20, 1988 Page 3 IV. CONCLUSION: The proposed Asendment provides needed regulation of coawe~l- vehicles and unattached trailers parked on City streets. These regulations are also consistent with the current developaent of truck routes and private property parking restrictions. ?his Nend~ent is an integral part of Generai Yehicle Regulation within the City of Rancho Cucaaanga. Res idly s Batt ~- r en City P Hoer BB:RLA:nas Attachaa!nts: RCMC Sections 10.52.050, 10.52.060, 10.52.080, 10.64.020, 10.64.050 and 10.68 CVC 22507, 22507.5, 22651(N1 Droposed Ordinance MieMing Sections 10,52,050, 10.52.060, 10.52.080 and 10.64.050 3 po .3.32.030--10,52.030 10,52.030 Parking space markings. The city traffic engineer is authorized by the city council to install and maintain parking space markings to indicate parking spaces for on-street and off-street narking. (Ord. 169 S1(part), :982: Grd. 39 §14.2, 1978). 10.52.040 Si ns or markin s indicating angle parking, A. The city traf is engineer as authorized by the city council shall deternine upon what streets angle parking shall be permitted and shall mark or sign such streets but such angle parking shall not be indicated upon federal-aid or the state highway within the city unless the Department of Trans- portation has determined that the roadway is of sufficient width to permit angle parking without interfering with the free movement of traffic. B. Angle parking shall not be indicated or permitted at any place where traffic would be caused or required to drive upon the left side o£ the street. (Ord. 169 §1 (part), 1982: Ord. 39 511.0, 19781. A. ExcepC as prove a or n t is section: 1. It is unlawful for any person to park any motor truck or trailer, or combination thereof, exceeding a gross weight of three tons upon any public attest, highway or alley within the city. 2. It is unlawful fer the ewrer of ary :,.otor truck or trailer, or combination thereof, exceeding a gross weight of three tons to allow such vehicle to remain standing upon any street, highway or alley in-the city. n. Motsar trucks or trailers, or combinations thereof, exceeding a gt~Ass weight of three tons may be parked on public streets,-Highways oz alleys as follows: 1. On desiggnated truck routes for a period of time not exceeding one hrhr; 2• while makilq pickups or deliveries of goods, wares or merchandise frow or to any property adjacent to or abutting upon streets or hishwaya which are not designated truck routes. 3. when such vehicle is parked in connection with and in aid of the performance of a service to or on a property in the block in which such vehicle is parked. C. In commercial zones, the city engineer may permit, by the posting of appropriate signs, limited parking for motor trucks, trailers or combinations thereof exceeding s ysuss weight of three tons where it is determined that to prohibit such parking is contrary to the public ineerest. D. The provisions of this section shall not apply in industrial zones. (Ord. 27 §§1--4, 1978). (Rancho Cucamonga 5/82) 1J8 ~~~ 10.52.060--1~.5J.'!3C be~arked, an~ f- y.. =.,=1 °"y person to parx, or cause to P I motor truck, trailer or combination thereof, exceeding a gross weight of one-and-one-half tons, upon any privately-owned property in a residential zone in the city between the hours of 10:00 p.m. on one day and 6:00 a.m. the following day. 9. It is unlawful for the owner of any motor truck, trailer or combination thereof, exceeding a gross weight of ^^°-'°d-one-half Cons, to allow ouch vehicle to be parked upon any privately-owned property in a residential zone in the city between the hours of 10:00 p.m. on one day and 6:00 a.m. the following day. (Ord. 34 SS1, 2, 1976). 4 10.52.070 Parking on private property. A. It is unlawrut zor any person to pazic, or cause to be parked, any vehicle upon any privately owned property in the city without the consent of the owner, tenant, oz other person entitled to possession of such property. B. It is unlnwful for the owner of any vehicle to allow such vehicle to be parked upon any privately owned property ir. the city without the consent of the owner, tenant, or other person entitled to possession of such property. C. For the purposes of this section there shall be a presumption of lack of consent when all of the following conditions exist: 1. The vehicle is not owned by or leased to the owner, tenant or other person entitled to possession of the property. ' '"._ ._..l..ia i° ° wucur crucx, trotter, or combina- tion thereof.` 3. The vehicle is parked on the property for more than one consecutive hour between the hours of 10:00 p.m, on one day and 6:00 a.m. on the following day. (Ord. 34 S§1--3, 1978). 10.52.080 Penalt for infractions. Any act or omission }~ declare un aw u y the provta one o Sections 10.52.050, 10.52.050 and 10.52.070 is an infraction punishable by a fine of twenty-five dollars. (Ord. 41 $1, 1978). Chapter 10.56 TRAFFIC RESTRICTIONS ON CERTAIN HIGHWAYS Sections• 10.56.010 Gross weight limits. 10.56.020 Truck restrictions. 139 ~D~ Sections: (Continued) 10.64.040 Allowing of Barking unlawful. 10.64.050 Penalty for infractions. 1.64.010 Oversize vehicles defined. An "oversize vehic a is any vehic e, motorize or non-motorized, tF.at exceeds twenty-five feet in length, or exceeds seven feet in width, andjor exceeds seven £eet in :ieight. Oversize vehicles shall include all hoses, truck tractors oe.iii-treiiers, motor trucks, trailers, campers, camp trailers, house cars, trailer coaches, and othes.,equipment or machinery regardless of width, length, or height. '"(prd. 39 §17.0, 1978). }~- 10.64.020 Permitted, asking area for oversize vehicles. A. Oversize vehicles may ~ parxed or store on pr vote property in all yard areas except the required front yard setback on any side yard abuttiny,a street right-of-way or as otherwise restricted by city ordinance. Semi-trailers, camp trailers, campers and/or house ears may be parked on the driveway or on an apron in the front yard setback located between the driveway and the side properly line closest to the driveway if: ~~ 1. The trailer or vehicle does not project over any property line; 2. The parking or storage area has a paved or graveled 9Urf aCe; 3.^.d 3. The area around said trailers and vehic l:es is kept clean and free of trash, debris and/or parts. B. YO COmmeic ial nv~rai va .u 6:.., .. _ _ _ _ vehicle shall be parked or stored in an r - ~y ray mac area. (Ord. 39 §17.1, 1978). Y Portion of any yard 10.64.030 ~?~ync restriction. It is unlawful for any person to park or sto ae car, trailer, camp trailer, trailer coach, camper or beat up`eq any public street, highway, or alley within the city for longer than ee~hour between the hours of two a.m. and six a.m. on any day. (Orf. 71 §l, 19'9). 10.64.040 Allowin of arkin unlawful. It is unlawful for the owner o any ouse car, tra er, camp trailer, trailer coach, camper or boat to allow the aforementioned to be parked or stored upon any public street, highway or alley within the city longer than one hour between the hours of two a.m. and Six a"m. nn an.. .~~.. ...ru ~- 10.64.050 Penalt for infractions. Any act declared un law u by t e provisions o t is c apter is an infraction punishable by fire of twenty-five dollars. (Ord. 71 g3, 1979). 143 30 3 .0.68.010--10.68.030 i.~ Chapter 10.68 VIOLATIONS--PENALTIES Sections: 10.68.010 Payment for citations issued. 10.68.020 Method of payment. 10.68.030 Paralty fur violation or conviction. 10.68.010 Pa nt for citations issued. The following sums sha a the pens ty or c tat ons issued under the following section9 of this ordinance: Sections 10.44.010, 10.44.030, 10.44.040, 10.44.060, 10.44.070, 10.44.080, 10.44.090, 10.44.120 and 10.48.010 (parking vioia- tions) Two dollars Section 10.14.050(A) {parking vehicle for sale) Twenty-five dollars Sections 10.60.010 (handicap oarkinq violations), 10.64.010 (violation of overload require- mentsi. Ten dollars. (Ord. 39 818.1, 1978). 10.68.020 Method of a nt. Penalties specified in Section 10.6 .0 sha a pa as designated on the citation --- ~- --- -..L ~..:C ~i Gl....r .aviauw,. t~iu. i> lie.Gr LY /a). 10.68.030 Penalt for violation conviction. Any person violating any o the prow sions o this tit e s all be guilty o£ a misdemeanor except as provided in Section 10.68.010. Any person who shall be convicted of a violation of this title shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, or by imprison- ment for not exceeding six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment for not exceeding six months, or by both such £ine and imprisonment, except in cases where a different punishment is prescribed by ordinance of this city. (Ord. 39 x18.0, 1978). 144 ~D~ 3T0PP[NC-.4TANDIMG-PARKING Ch. 9 stop. +und, or pad vehkles upon city streets for period longer than on< hour be twe<n 1:90 and 6:00 a.m. o[ my day without permu from poliro depertmwnt. applieabN ro a sate highway in sbwnro of caution therefor by some provuion of sou Nw. :d. ~- § 22507, Lord resulaNon g zzso~ VioNtion of ordinances or reulutiona en- ured by loesl au[honties to rteuNu park ing N ttrtain pertieuNm w authorized by 44 22509. 22506 to ?1.509. 22519 N rmt in WoNtion of the Vehirk Code. 36 Ope.Atty. Cen. d9, B-2a-fiL Local authorities may, by ordinance or resolution, prohibit or restrict [he parking or standing of vehicles, including vehicles which are six feet or more in height lincluding any load thereon) within 100 feet of any intersection, on certain streets or highwayre, or portions Hereof, during all or certain hoots of the day. The ordinance or resolution may include a designatlon of certain streets upon which preferential parkiag privi- leges are given W residents sad merchants adjacent to He streets Lor then use and He use of He'v guests, under which He rea§deou and merchants may be issued a permit or permits which exempt tMm from the prohibition or restriction of He ordinance or tsolution. WiH He exception of dleya, no such ordinance or resolution ahdl apply until signs or markings giving adequate notice Hereof love been placed. A local ordinance or resolution adopted pursuant to Hia eet'tion may contain provieiona which are reasonable and necessary to inure the eiiec[iveness of a preferential pwking program. IStata.1959, c. 3, p. 1700, 422501. Amended by Stata.l963, c. 1070, p. 2580, ¢ 1; 5tau.1969, c, 511, p. 1168. ¢ 1; Stets.1976, a 1102, p. 4982, ¢ 1; 5tau.1980, c. un n 933 a P Shh.t981. c. 181.4 2.1 Nlsbrlesi Nqe The 1963 amendment added [h< words "or restrict' to the tint ununn. The t9a9 amendment added the accord senesce !now the third senhnael. The 1916 amendment inserted the second sentence. The 1980 amendment inwrrad "tor their uu and the uw of their Banta" in tan serond untence, inaerW "or permits' fob lowing "issued a permit" in the uemnd um team. and subaumwd "exempt" (or "ex~ empu" preredinB "them from the" in tae second ununro, and added the fourth sem term. The 1981 amendment inserted "including vehkln which are six feet nr nitro in hei8ht lincluding anY load thereon) within 1W feet of any inunectron" m the fiat eenunn. mbatltuted "th<" for "such" a[ the Degim nine of the accord wnuntt, zed aubetituo ed "are" (or "eAdl be" folbwine "parking pnvileges" in N< ucond aenunes. Qedaatbn: Veh.C.1935, S 159.8. added by Sutal953, e. i09, p. 1979, 4 3. Craw N.etertn<es nen,.,,,o... Alley. see § 110. Highway, see §§ dW, 392 (nkal authuntln. see § 8tl5. Park or yarking, sea § ts3. ?trees see 4 ~i90, {'rhmle, see § d70. 71 ~jD~ STOPPING-STAYDIYG-pARK[9G § 22507.5 Ch. 9 lal The name and address of the owner or lessee of the private property is on the permit. Ibl The permit is effective while the holder owns o; leases the property for which the permit is iaeued, but may be revoked without ecN^_^ o: hearing i{the local authority determines that parking authorized by the pormit creates traffic safety or other public health and safety problems. Icl The permit is prominently displayed in the front windshield of any vehicle parked in front of the private driveway. The local authority may charge a nonrefundable fee to defray the costs of issuing and administering the permits. A local ordinance adopted pursuant to this aeMion may not authorize parking on a sidewalk in violation of subdivision Iq o[ Sedan 22500. I {dded by Stata.1980, a I58, p. 356, § 2, att. June 11, 1980. Amended by 6tats.1981. c. 219, § 1. efT. June 20, 1984.1 NWOAraI YWe The 1981 amendment substituted in eubd. "(or a period of one yev tram the date o[ Ibl "while the holder owns or leues the ueuvntti : and added the lut property for whkh the permit b lamed" for WraarapA' LlErarr Referer,eea Automobiles ay31 ., 13, CJ S ylotor Vehicles 44 &31. Het seq., _... _., v n cry. t- § 22507.5. Local regulation: overnight parking; commercial ve• hiclee Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 2250'7, local authorities may, by ordiranca or resolution, prohibit or restrict the parking or standing of vehicles on certain streets or highways, or portions thereof, between the hours of 2 a.m. and 6 a.m., and may, by ordinance or resolution, prohibit or restrict the parking or standing, on any street, or portion thereof, in a residential district, of commercial vehicles having a manufacturer's gross vehicle weight rating of 10,000 pounds or more. Such ordinance or resolution relating to parking between the hours of 2 a.m. and 6 a.m. may provide for a system of permits for the purpose of exempting from the prohibition or restriction of such ordinance or resolution handicapped persons and regidopee of h. haens ~. ^g^ ~ i~ -dltipie-famiiV dweiiinv areas n. similar areas lacking adequate oftstreet parking facilities. e No such ordinance or resolution relating to the parking or standing of commercial vehicles in a residential district shall, however, be effective with respect to any- commercial vehicle making pickups or deliveries of goods, wares, and merchandise from or to any building or structure located on the restricted streets or highways or for the purpose of delivetting materials i3 3a ~ § 22507.5 RIIC.ES OF THE ROAD DI•. Il to be used in the actual and bona fide repair, alteration, remodeling, or tronetruction of any building or structure upon the restricted aheeU or highways for which a building permit has previously been obtained. (Added by Stib.1999, c. 541, p. 1168, § 2. Amended by Stata.19T5, c. 1213, p. 3069.4 L Sr.4 1970, c. 7f, p. G, f =, atC. Ya.:h 3, :3;a.i 7Te 1975 rmeWment imertW "eW nuy, by ordinance or roeolution, prohibit or rtr strict Ne prrking or atutdin[, on any atmR or portion thereof, m a mideutol du Viet, of mmmtetvl vehklp l4vm[ a menutactuter'a [rorr vehkb wei[nt tatm[ Hlttorfcal Note Dermitbn. Hi[hwq, rw 1f Ja0, SWL [oil rathorititr, ees 1396. 1'ertinL ear 9 bD. Stmt, see y 990. VehkN, tar t 970. of 6,000 pounds or more" N tl,e Cvat a<n teMa, end Wiled the artorA un4nee (non thud tentetawl. 7M IPlB rtneWmnt mhetitured "10,000" (or "6,000" in rM Cuat reotenee, eW added tha raeoW arntenw. Crate arfenarr IJbrarl Rrfeeencea AutomobiNt X5181, 7, 12 CJ $, nator Y<hkla H 6131, l4 at esp., L8, 29t 11 et srq. § 22507.6. Local regulaNan; street sweeping; rnmmerefd vehk:la; signs Local authoeities may, by ordinance or resolution, prohibk or restrict the parking or standing of vehicles on desigtuted stree4 or highways, or portions thereof, for the purpose of street sweeping. No ordinance or resolution relating to the parking or standing of crommercial vehicles in s residential district shall be e[fective with respect to toy commeroul vehicle making pickups or deliveries of goods, wares, or merehandne from or to any building or structure located on Ne restricted street or highway, or for the purpate of delivering materials W be used in the repair, alteration, remodeling, or reconatrection of any building or ettva lure [or which a building permit hoe previously been obtained. No such ordinance or resolution shall be eftectlve until the street or highway, or uOYtiGa tfierenf. I!6! turn etgn.~r~ in dt•'Oi JUatiie Fr i'u`t the 4nllOrm standards and specifications of the Department of Trtnaportation, or local authoridee have caused to be posted in t tronepicuow phue at euh entrance to the street a notice not lase thin 17 inchte by 22 inches in size, with lettering not leas than one inch ir. height, setting torN the illy or days and houre perking is prohibited. As used in Nis section, T4 3~7 § 22850 RL'LE8 OF THE ROAD Dlr. Il Ia. Rnle~ Commentarke Automobile xuch.~-Co:utitutbmllimi- Corotitutio[Wity or onlineme auttwrixing tenon Hereon. Anthony Numy efW Rob. vx of "denver hoot" ro immobiliu ilkgnlly art E. A,tken. 11940) 9 luyok 4Rev. (CaF narked motor vehkln. p9791 6a A.R.AJ. ifJ 95. 75T Library 14fersnen Automobiln r12, 311. C1.3. Tmpeu 44 5E to Sa, 133. Treepue aa24. CJ.S. Traver end Canvenion ;; 83 m aa. Traver end Convenwo e.22, 28. C.J.S. Motor Vehkln;; G31 ?8 et seq., 5a8 et seq. }- § 22651. Clreumatancea permitting rcmmal Any peace officer, as that term is defined in Chapter 4.5 (rnmmencing with Section 830) of Title 3 of Part 2 of the Peaal Code; or any regularly employed and salaried empbyee, who is engaged in dieecting tntfk or enforcing puking 4ws and regttlatioru, of a city or a comfy in which vehicle is located maq remove a vehicle from a highway located within the temtorial limits in which The officer or employee may aM under any of the following eircumanncea: (a1 When any vehicle ie left unattended upor. any bridge, viaduct, or causeway or in any tube or tunnel where the vehicle rnnaututea an obstruction to traffic. Ihl Whams a ~oh:nl~ :r w.4.A ,.. t„a _ ... ~:__ ..___ _ u_~_._.. ~_ _...e _r........n....,y ,.. position so asyto obstruct the normal movement of traffic or in a condition so u to create a heard to other traffic upon the highway. (c) When any vehicle is found upon a highway and a report has previously been made that the vehicle has been stolen or a complaint {laa been tiled and a warrant thereon issued charging that the vehicle has been embezzled. ' Id1 When any vehicle is illegally parked so ae to block the entrance to a private driveway and it ie impractical to move the vehicle from in front of the driveway to another point on the highway. (e) When any vehicle is illegally parked so m to prevent access by firetightlng equipment to a fve hydrant and it ie impractinble to move the vehicle from in front o[ the [ire hydrant to another point on the highway. ill when any venlcle, except any highway maintenance or comtruction equipment, is stopped, parked, or left standing for more than tour houre anon the lightof-way of any freeway which has full control o[ access and no crossings at grade and the driver, if present, cannot move the vehicle under its own power. I04 fag PARKED AYD ABANDONED VEHICLES §226u? Ch. la Ig) When, the person or persons in charge of a vehicle upon a highway are by reason of physical injuries or illness incapacitated [o an extent sn as to be unable is provide for its custody or removal. Ihl When an officer arrests any person driving or in control of a vehicle for an alle¢ed offense and the nfrrer is, by this ^_^de or ~c.".er law, required or permitted to take, and does take, the person arrested before a magistrate without unnecessary delay. lil When any vehicle registered in a foreign jurisdiction or without a current California registration is found upon a highway and it is known to have been issued five or more notces of parking violation over a period of five or more days, to which the owner or person in control of the vehicle has not responded, the vehicle may be impounded until that person furnishes to the impounding law enforcement agency evidence of his or her identity and an addme within this state st which he or she can be located and satisfactory evidence that bail hu been deposited for all notices of parking violation issued for the vehicle. A notice of parking violation issued to such a vehicle shall be accompanied by a warning that repeated violations may result in the impoutding of the vehicle. In lieu of requiring satisfactory evidence that the bail has been deposited, the impounding law enforcement agency may, in its discretion, issue a notice to appear for the offenses charged, as provided in Article 2 (commencing with Section 405001 of Chapter 2 of Division 17. In lieu of either furniahinR satisfactory evidence [het the bail hoe been deposited or accepting the notice to appear, that person may demand to be taken . ,:.~... _. _ __~J C::G~ `c -"' ,oa~aL sic .. iii,iu ~i,e county in which the ~offenaea charged are`alleged to have been committed and who has jurisdiction of the offenses and is nearest or mast accessible with reference to the place where the vehicle is impounded. Evidence of current registration shall be produced after a vehicle has been impound• ed or a notice to appear for violation of subdivision la) of Section 4000 shall be issued to that petaon. tll When any vehicle is found illegally parked and there are no license plates or other evidence of registration displayed, the vehicle may be impounded until the owner or person in control of the vehicle Furnishes the impounding law enforcement agency evidence of his or her identity and an address within this ante at which he or she can be located. Ikl When any vehicle is parked or left standing upon a highway for 72 or more consecutive hours in violation of a local ordinance authorizing removal. 1! 1 When any rehicle is illegally parked on a highway in violation of an>• Ixal ordinance forbidding standing or parking and the use of a highway or a portion thereof is necessary [or the cleaning, repair, or construction of the highway, or for the installation of underground utilities, and signs giving notice that the vehicle may be removed are I05 ~~ / § 22651 RULES OF THE ROAD Dlr. 11 erected or placed at least 24 hour prior [o the removal by local auehoritiea pursuant to Ne ordinance, (m) Wherever Ne use of the highway, or any portion Hereof, is authorized by local suthoritiee for a purpose other than Ne normal flow of traffic or for the movement of equipment, articles, or structures of unuauai size, and Ne parking of any vehicle would prohibit or interfere wiH that use or movement, and signs giving aotice slut Ne vehkle may be removed are erected or placed at least 24 hour prior to the removal by local auNoritiee pursuant to the ordiwnce. a.~ (n) Whenever soy vehicle is parked or Iek standing where local authorities, by resolution or ordinance, have prohibited parking and have auNorized the removal o[ vehkles. No rehkle may be removed unless signs are posted giving notice of the removal. (o) When soy unattended vehkle is fond upon • highway with a regietretton expiratwn date io ezceu of ooe year before the date it is found on the highway. For purposes of thm mbtliviaioo, tha unattended vehkle shall be released to the owner or perwo io control of the vehkle only otter Ne owner or person faroiattea the etmring Lw eoforoemeot agency with proof of current eegiatretion. In lieu Of ttbtaioing proof of curtest regietratbo, Ne storing agetny may, N its diacretioo, woe a notice to appear for the t'egistntion vio4tioe. fP) When the peace officer woes Ne driver of a vehkle a notice to appear for a vio4tan of Section 12500, 14601, 14601.1, or 14801.2 and there is no passenger in the vehkle who hoe a valid darver'e license end auuwrization w operate the venple. My vehkle so removed from the highway shall cot be released to the registered owner or hie or her agent except upon presentation of the registered owner's or his or her agent's curnntly valid drivers license to operate Ne vehicle or upon order of a court. (Stata.l959, c, e, p, 1701, 422851. Amend¢d by Stata.i969, e. 972, p. 9009, q l; Stara.l960, 1st ExSpa., c. 59, p. 108, 4 3; 34b.1988, c. 1001, p, 2271, 4 2; Srau.198'f, c. 518, p. 1891, , 1; Stau.19g8, c. 749, p. 1452, q 1; Stau.1989, e. 1116, p. 2177,; l; 8ta4.1970, c. 888, p. 1820, { 1; 3tab.1871, a 190, p. 172. 4 1, opennve May 9, 1972; 34ts.1911, c. SIb, p. 1827, { 211; Shb.197?, c. 13, p. 477, q 1; Stau.1977, a 488, p, 1605, f 2; Staa.1977, c. 1128, p, 3824, { $ Sgta.l979, c. 881, p. 2874. { 1; Stats.l979, c. 909, p. 3129, ¢ 2.9: Shts.1980, c. 1340. p.1795, f 81, etf. Sept. 30, 1980; Stau.1981, c. 313, p. ISOI, { 1; Shhd982, c. 814, p. 1&7, { t; Suw.198$, c. 818,; 1; 9fab.i988, c, 1011, q 9.1 Hkmele.l Nara 7Tk section. u originally enured, read rtgukdY empbYed uM wlarird offker of as folbwc ppoollee departmanr N • ray in whkh t r- "Any member of the Califomk Hi`hwry hek u bcatN m.y nraove •rehkle from Patrol or any mryWly rmpbyed end uk- highwq under tM folbwing circumeuncea: ned deputy of tM ahanffe office of • mun- "lal when any whkk k kR uultended ty in which a vehkle u located or any upon any bridge, vkduet or nuNway w in 108 ORDINANCE N0. ~~I3 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA AMENDING SELECTED SECTIONS OF CHAPTERS 10.52 AND 10.64 AND REPEALING CHAPTER 10.68 PERTAINING TO REGULATIONS ON THE PARKING OR STANDING OF YEHSCLES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FVLLUII~: SECTION 1: Section 10.52.050 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is amend3-~ read, in words and figures, as follows: 10.52.050 Parking Overweight Yehicles - Neight Limitation. A. No person shall park or leave standing any commercial vehicle, as the same 1s defined in the California Vehicle Code, having a manufacturer's gross vehicle weight rating of ten thousand (10,000) pounds or more on any street, or portion thereof, located in a residential district within the City. B. Vhere signs or markings have been placed dlrecting compliance with the provisions of this subsection, no person shall park or leave standing on any public street, highway, parkway or property dedicated to pubUc use in any residential district within the City, any vehicle, motor truck, trailer, semi-trailer or combination thereof. navina a manufacturer's gross vehicle weight rating of one and one-half (1-1/2) tons or more, or a width in excess of eighty (80) inches. C. Where signs or markings have been placed directing compliance with the provisions of this subsection, no person shall park or leave standing on any public street, highway, parkway or property dedicated to public use, in any commercial or Industrial district of the City, any vehicle, motor truck, trailer, semi-trafler or combination thereof, having a manufacturer's gross vehlcle weight rating of three (3) tons or more, or a width in excess of eighty (80) inches, 0. The previsions of this sec Lion shall not apaly to the following: 1. Public emergency vehicles; 2. Vehlcies parked for the purpose of making pick-ups and deliveries while actively involved in such activity; 3. Vehicles parked in connection with, and 1n aid to, the performance of a service to, or on, a property Sn the black where such vehicle is parked while actively involved in such service activity; and, 3// Ordinance No. Page 2 4. Public utility vehicles. 5. Nhere signs have been erected authorizing temporary parking of such vehicles. 3ECTIOii 2: Section iC.52.06G of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is herebyy alto read, in words and figures, as follows: 10.52.060 Parking of trailers or semi-trailers. A. No person shall park or leave standing any trailer or semi- trailer upon any public street, highway, alley, parkway or property dedicated to public use, or any portion thereof, unless the trailer or semi-trailer is at all times while so parked and standing attached to a vehicle capable of moving such trailer or semi-trailer. B. This section shall not apply W trailers or semi-trailers in the process of being loaded or unloaded while actively involved in such activity or trailers or semi-trailers parked and left standing in connection with, and in aid to, the performance of a service to, or on, a property in the block in which such vehicle is parked while actively involved in such activity.' JlCr1U1 .f: Section lu.S2. UtfU of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amen ed-to read, in words and figures, as follows: 10.52.080 Penalty for Infractions - Tow Away. Any act or om soon declare un aw u y e prov s ons of this Chapter is an infraction punishable by a fine not to exceed that set by the current uniform countywide bail schedule established pursuant to the terms of the California Yehicle Cade. Any vehicle left parked or standing Tn violation of the provisions of thts Chapter shall be sub,iect to being towed away to accordance with those regulations set forth in the California Yehicle Code pertaining to the towing of vehicles from public streets and property. SECTIOY 4. Section 10;64,024 of t!~ Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Cede is hereby repeaiee. SECTION 5: Section 10,64.050 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amend-to read, in words and figures, as follows: 10.64.050 Penalty for Infractions. Any act or omission ec are unTawfT y~ pret7~ o of this Chapter is an infraction punishable by a fine not to exceed that set by the current uniform countywide bail schedule established pursuant to the terms of the California Vehicle Code. ~- Ordinance No. Page 3 SECTION 6: Chapter 10.68 of the Rancho Cucaaonga Municipal Code is hereby repeaTd:- SECTION T: The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragrap sentence or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of caapetent Surisdiction, or by reason of any pree~ptive legislation, the reaktintng provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall rea~ain in full force and effect. SECTION 8: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance~~sTiaTi cause the save to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of-0n a-t rio; LaTfT'ornia, and circulated 1n the City of Rancho Cucasonga, Calffornia. 3 ~ CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONCA STAFF REPORT ,~ (' ,- DATE: April 20, 1988 ,..i T0: City Council and City Manager i FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer ~ i BY: JuGY Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE NORK IN CONNECTYON NITN ANNEXATION N0. 40 FOR ' TRACT NOS. 12643, '.3555, 13556, 13558, 13560, 13561,13563, DR 87-11, DR 87-26 (PM 10782) AND PARCEL MAP 9350 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. i RECONMEM[lATIOM: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 40 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGRWND/ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a roenu,r+~., ^_Cs-. ;y t`a ,.~,A in cmn,ec Ciun wirn xnnexatton No. 40 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 for Tract Nas. 12643, 13555, 13556, 13558, 13560, 13581, 13563, DR B7-I1, DR 87-26 (PM 10782) and Parcel Map 9350. The developers of the subtect protects have been notified of the public hearing by matt. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88-143. Resp t submitted, RHM. ~' Attachments ~~ RESOLUTION N0. ~~ ~ - a.Cf A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE NORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 40 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AHD ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TAACT NOS. 12643, 13555, 13556, 13558, 13560, 13561, 1'x563, DR 87-11, DR 87-26 (PM 10786) AND PARCEL MAP 9350 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamongga did on the 16th day of March, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 86-144 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 40 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 88-144 was duly and legally published Tn the time, fora and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Inten*.ion on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of intention, headed 'Notice of Improvement', was duly and legally posted in the time, fora, manner, location, and nwnber as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file 1n the office of the City Clerk; and NHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88-144, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same aooears on thn la<r natitnn .. ~ ~.,.,..,, ._ .,.. ~,..... of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copi esMwere duly mailed in the ~time,~form,yand manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and NHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to crder the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga t at the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of In1on41nn No. 00-144, be d~rie drid mdda: anA SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; and-- SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's- eR-port are hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 6O cent of said tracts ave been occupied. J~S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineerls Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation No. 40 for Tract Nos. 12643, 13555, 13556 13558, 13560, 13561, 13563 DR 87-11, DR 87-26 and Parcel Map 9350 SECTION 1, Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTInN 2. General Oescripti on This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No, 1. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. work to be provided for with the assessmzn t; established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materia is fnr tha nrw;nan,. .,.a usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on major streets (arterial and certain collector streets) as shown on the Lightiny District Altos Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cast shall be assessed on a Der unit basis. SECTION 3, Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made tc the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of hFn et..e • ti L•: T e• Vn~inC] of eGi. liltl Uiafl\ r1n 11 Cflef li if At i!]nc inn cinppY lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. ~provement by developers. Based costs for assessment •e estimated only, t. seen demarcated into Movements on ma3 or . multi-family, loch dwelling unit in ~r the operation of it and institutional !d that one acre of !as derives the same :e District No. 1 is F New Lamp Total 444 499 16 4 Total Annual s Maint. Cost = S 47,579.04 = 60,838.08 = 2,319.36 = 664 32 = 3.123.24 E114,524.04 16,245 571 16,816 3~~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NA. 1 ANNEXATION N0. 4O ~• ~~. // 70 r n u I~ s n II ~b° n n ~ ~ s r ~~ i~ ~s u r ~ a z. ~ ~ ® TURF I GROUND COVER TURF ARF 0 S.F. m i>. .. I 'u n GROUND COVER AREA 30,M0 S.F. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. Z ANNEXATION NO. qp z. a ! . r is ~e xo xe xx a xe xs ~e u u t3 a ii ~o _ ~ >. r ~ s s ~ e e ~ ~ 3e ..... at ~ -~ -.__....-._- r 79 ,. :: ~~e1 ~ ~, x t u i! 3 I ~ N M 4S , M - TURF Q GROUND COMER TURF AREA ROUND COVER AREA 7,275 S.F. 55,785 S.F. S~i`~':, - CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~[ONOA ._: •.~' - COUNTY OF 8AN BEBNARDIIdO ~? STATE OF CALIFORNIA - N ___ ;fi___ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIvHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. Z ANNEXI0.TION NO. 4-0 TURF :~ GROUNO COVER TURF AREA 0 5.F. GROUND COVER AREA 18,80 S,F. `-~~r CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1[ONOA ~ ,r ,~i , s.., , ,' ..\' _ COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDII~iO : ~'~ `= -. `~ ~ STATE OF CAI.II+ORNU --~-~ - N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 90 TURF GROUND COVER TURF AREA a,o~o s.F. GROUND COVER AREA 71,345 S.F. ,~~`~+;. C1TY OF RANCHO CUCAI[ONOA ~ ~R 13.5SR s~ ' ` ~" COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO ~~ 8TAT8 OF CALII+ORNU - N ~~-' ASSESSMENT dIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. Z ANNEXATION NO. ¢O ® TURF GROUND COVER TURF AREA x,300 S.F ,pi~S~`!fl~„ CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1[ONdA s ~ t_ COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO ..,_; y: ``~" STATE OF CALIFORNIA --~-- GROUND COVER AREA 41,730 S.F. n N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. Z ANNEXATION NO. ¢O ~~1~~~~~a~s~t~a~a 17IN Ita I1a I10I 11 ~ ~M~~~ 1•~ ~r'IIp -~-~ ~=Z~ - TURF GROUND COVER TURF AREA 2,030 S.F. GROUND DOVER AREA 42,660 S.F. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION NO. pfd s 7 { 6 / ~ 3 7 .~- ~ 11 ~ it b I7 17 N M 1f A 79 St 11 ~y >• » 7Q r >0 'b s z7 13 ~~.__ f0 7t it /f 10 T 72 T7 21 73 b 17 - TURF URF A_ 11 UND COVER AREA .ra GROUND COVER g,~pD S.F. D,8/0 S.F. L I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION NO. ¢0 STATE HMY ~ ..- :~ ----. 1 ~ - = L 1~1~ _ / -ti ~I --~. > ~- t ~- ~ I v t ~ 'T- ~' #i ~' ~ 1~ m- T ,s"~~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1[ON(iFA ~ D R 8 7- '., . ;' ..\~ : COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO '~ ` ~ aTATE OF CALIFORNIA w T "~-• lv ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. Z ANNEXATpN NO. ¢0 CRFOW POJ1E .ti._-~~ _ -_ . _ _ r- ~T~~ U :~~ ,i ~ .4 W ~ - _ - _ _ _: ai-.v I I W a ~~ n as a_ p~ ~.. ._ II^,~i .: s: nc~ S ` ,;~ n ~ oI _ ° ~ II ~ -~ ^--r) ve-BPS as':. E •JS ern '' i •__.. _~~ p ~~ i y p ~J: r~ °JC~_°L E~~ ~ ~ - - - _ -=- ~„ r; __. J ~.,f~ __ _ ~_~ _ _ _ _. 1 1 _ ~~ °._ •_ i..~~~0 _ae ~~ .?.. L .V ~. ~ •l .h Y~ ;~.' f y a ~ .~I ~~ .u '. •~ erT G_.. ~a FP'.1 . ~_ '3.f ~-il..y ~ -~ W i ~i ~, _E •_ // _ _ _ 1 Y ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. Z ANNEXATION NO. ~0 H IGNLANO AVENUE _~~ v fYa ..r. S. P R,it, ~~~ 4~ Y ~ .~"; ~~ Z .~ < ~ ~ y__~_- _ / Z C ~i ~ ~ '1~ 3 r ~~. ` o ri \ w..~ n. y . Nib N a iA ate` ? ~4 A ;~ i. ^' • ~ -a w~ r Z ~ASELIIYE FtOAO ta~`~~ CITY OF SADiC80 CUCAI[ONOA .,,; •. COUNTY OF SAN BElZNA8DIN0 ~_ =: ~ ; BTATE OF CA1.iFORNIA - N -~- - CITY OF RANCHO C[.'CA~IONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Atde °V .~ i SUBJEC?: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 9 FOR PARCEL MAP 9350, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD BETWEEN MILLIKEN AND ROCHESTER AVENUES TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 RECOI~ENCJITIOM: It is recoaiaended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Mnexatton No. 9 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUNDjANALYSIS e..__w,.. s.,..,._.. Ccy__„ ___ ... ,_ _ ____....,__ _..,. .,_ ... connection with Annexation~No.v9~to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 for Parcel Map 9350, located on the north side of Base Line Road between MTiltken and Rochester Avenues. The developer of the subject pro,iect has been notified of the public hearing by awt1. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88-145. Respect 1 bwtitted, / _ -~ ' ~s~Y :JA: -'i' fiiirrhmnnrc 3 3a RESOLUTION N0. B ~ - ~Y 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE NORK IN CONNECTION KITH ANNEXATION N0. 9 7O STREET LIGHTING IMINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE fTNAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PARCEL IMP 9350 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho cucaa~enga did on the :6th day of March, 1588, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 88-146 toorder the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 9 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3, which Resolution of Intention No. 88-146 was duly and legally published fin the time, forni and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed 'Notice of Improvement", was duly and legally posted 1n the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and NHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duty mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed far the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88-146, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as aooearc frrw +~ ass?,:.?: cf ~,;;;;;,y u„ ;;;r ;,, cne orrice of the City Clerk; and NHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evtdence, oral and documentary, concerning the ,iurtsdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived ther=from and said City Council having now acquired ,lurisdictlon to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88-146, be done and made; and iiEd SV the Fn~inacn ig hgr.•~•• f+_-"^ SEETigN ?• The .°.epdrt f++ _ ~ ,,,a„~. approved; dnd SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's e~lE-p~are hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tracis-have been occupied. ~3/ CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 Annexation No. 9 for Parcel Map 9350 SECTiDN i. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street lighting Maintenance District No. 3. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon ail lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on local streets as shown on the itnht ;nn uiscn cc q~tas Map which fs on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3, plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared 6y the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the sub,)ect tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the enact location of the street liyhting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made apart Of this report to fhu eat .°.X tent d'a if id'i u' ula0v_ anri c_nu_r_i4irc ., dtL dC ned hereto. ~ "'~~ ""` Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. 33J SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Liaht ina Maintenance District No. 3 is con.:prisad of street light improvements on local streets for residential improvements (single family, multi-family, condominiums and apartments) throughout the Victoria Planned Community. Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in residential areas. The estimated total cost far Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energv Cost: No. of Lamps Lamps Annex New Lamp Lamp Size* YTD No 9 Total 5800E 1,058 --- 1,058 4Fnni o~ -- -'" 02 *High Pressure Sodium Vapor Total ramp Size Lamps .Rate Mo's 5800E 1,058 X 3 8.93 % 12 9500E 82 X 510.16 X 12 Total Annual Maint. Cost 2, Total Assessment Units: I II_I YC_C_G_C_C_ i_Ini t< hofnnn •L:• ... ... ....rmc wr~a anilc:(atiVll Assessment Units this annex Der page 4 = Total Assessment Units Total Annual Maint. Cost = 3113,315.26 9.997.44 3123,372.72 3,i86 206 3,392 33-3 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost = f12_ 3? = f36.37/year/unit No, o n sin str ct Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Sect ton 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Ofaaram Copies of the Droposed Assessment Diagrams are attached tm this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance Dlstrict No. 3", Annexation No. 9. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the tent of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the Dlstrict are found to be of general benefit to all units within the Dlstrict and that assessment shall be equal far each unit. Nhen units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 1. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary gppraval of City Engineer's Reoort. 2, City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council tondutts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedtngs. 4. Every year in lAay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5, Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or mod iftes and approves the individual assessments. ~~ EXHIBIT "A" Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 9 to Street Lighting Maintenance bistrict 3: Assess. No. of Lames to be Annexed Prc~ect Acrea a un f x'!wl 35Su~ ~6,60~L Z PM 9350 pcl 1 44,9 90 --- --- --- --- --- pcl 2 24,0 48 --- --- --- --- --- pcl 3 34,2 68_ _, _ _ _ Total 103.1 206 --- --- --- --- --- ~ 3 S- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 ANNEa(ATION NO. ~ H IGHLANO AVENUE - ~r `-.~ ...~~ F ~; + ' ., n ~ Z ' a ~ ~ e ~+ -- Z c °~.: ~~- 2 pA SEL f ME 5. R R.R. ~i A ~( ~ 3 =~ _ ~ ! ~ " ~~ '~ "~ y `~y~ 9 ^o i i ~ f'~ Z KOAU ; , .v"s'°~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1[ONOA s! _ ~ '. COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO n :.-~ ~= ~: ~ sTATE OF CALIFORNIA - ~ T ~. 6 1~ -~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCA:1tONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide J ~ SUBJECT: ORDERING THE NORK IN CONNECTION NITH ANNEI(ATION N0. 3 FOR TRACT NOS. 12643, 13555, 13556, 13558, 13560, 13561 AND 13563 fCARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 5 RECOMIEIOATION: It is recoimended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the vrork in connection rtth Annexation No. 3 t0 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS AttarhsA v,,. tiro r„.,.,~ii „~ .. -,...,__ ..,__ connection with Annexation ~NO.~~3 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 for Tract Nos. 12643, 13555, 13556, 13558, 13560, 13561 and 13563 (Caryn Planned Com!minity). The developer of the subject tracts has been notified of the public hearing by mall. The attached resolution also aDDroves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88-147. Respec y~submi tted, /, i l/l~y-~~~T RHM:JA:s m A It al. ~II11C111 t~ 337 RESOLUTION k0. ~j g ~•~J A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE NORK IN CONNECTION NITH ANNEXATION N0. 3 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 5 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 12643, 13555, 13556, 13558, 13560, 13561 IVID 13563 (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamongga did on the 16th day of March, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 86-148 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 3 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5, which Resolution of Intention No. 88-148 was duly and legally published to the time, form and Wanner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and NHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and NNEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to alt persons owning real property p^oposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88-148, according to the names and addresses of such owners as •An n~~n -n-n~r~ n. •Ln 1-n• r_t1, .. L •~ 4- •L_ nt ~.. n1 ...1. .L .L. nt ~.. of Rancho-Cucamonga, which said copies werenduly mailed in the time, form,~and manner as required by Iaw, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and NHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the•,jurlsdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired ,jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: !t is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at the public Interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Tnte of inn 4n N4-Lin Nn Annn •nA s~.An• nnA SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Eng{veer is hereby finally approved; a.~- SECTION 3; The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's-heport are hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tracts have been occupied. ~~~ 3 ~O CITY OF RANCi10 CUCAMDNGA Engineer's Report for Street Light ing Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) Annexation No. 3 for Tract Nos. 12643, 13555, 13556, 13558, 13560, 13561 and 13563 SECTION 1, Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landstaping and Lighting Act of 1912). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance Dtstr ict No. 5. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Nork to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street lioht rnprovemencs on local streets as shown ort the Lighting District Altos Map which is on ff le with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general berief it to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3, Plans and Specifications The plans and specificaticns for street lighting have keen prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the Pity Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications far street liahtina improvement nn the i^div!dual deve',o^ ._ ,.men,. is i8 reby iTiade a udr't of ibis report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the !llumfnation of the subject area, 339 SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street 17ghting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No< 5 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of street light improvements on local streets for residentiai improvements (single family, multi-family, condominiums and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and institutional pro,)ects throughout the City. It has been determined that nne acre of land in industrial, camnercial and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in Zane 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: No, of Lamps Lamps gnnez New Lamp Lamb Size* YTD No. 3 Total 5800E 168 65 233 9500E 0 0 0 *High Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps Rate Mo's Mafnt. Cost 5800E 233 X E 8.93 X 12 = E24,968.28 9500E 0 X E10.16 X 12 0 Total Annual Maint. Cost = E24,968.28 l• TVtal A]fel~llle llt 1l rlll\: YTD Assess Units before this annexation = 637 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 298 Total Assessment Units 935 ~J 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost = E24.~96~8,.28 E26.IO/year/unit No, o m s in istnc ' Rssessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proDOS ed Assessment Diagr ans are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5", Annexation No. 3. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the tent of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to he of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Nhen units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 1. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers alt testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a reDOrt with the City Council. 5. Every year in .tune, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. 341 EXHIBIT "A" Properties and improvement; to be included wfthin Annexation No. 3 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 5: Assess. Na. of L s to be Annexed Proj2^.t Acre aye u~ ow uuL +o, c[,w L /, ~UUL Tract 12643 49 8 --- --- --- --- 13555 47 10 --~- --- --- --- 13556 40 9 --- --- --- --- 13558 52 13 --- --- --- --- 13560 ~ 23 6 --- --- --- --- 13561 43 9 --- --- --- --- 13563 44 10 --- --- --- --- Total 298 65 --- --- --- ~ --- 342 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.S ANNEXATION NO. 3 ~~ . 2 ~ 10 it ~ u v u n 11 7 11 17 1tl I I ]5 L b 7 I ~ S` I u~ 1f 115 110 1 21 I~ I a 131 TURF GROUND COMER wa~aawua a ~__Mr,~.__.J x a1 u as a~ as~x~n~~ei TURF AREA GROUND COVER AREA 0 S.F. 30,410 S.F. ASSESSMENT DIADRAM STREET LIGNTiNG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NA.S ANNEXATION NO. 3 17 1t 10 Ib 31 I ZZ ~ ~ b 2/ ZS 1f 10 1f 11 73 11 10 ~ ~ ~ M 71 ~ 79 _. ._ ~ I1 t0 1 I 1 I ~ ~ ~ 7 f7 M fS N - TURF TURF AREA GRt)UND COVER AREA Q GROUND COVER 7,275 S.F. 55,7D5 S.F. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.S ANNEXATION NO. 3 : a ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~~ ~= is a u '~ +~ s ~ ~ '~r.~C - y u a x~ a a a~ au u ~ m a~ n ~ r ~ •~~ _~.~ 10 ~ ~ 77 M ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ TURF TURF AREA GROUND COVER AREA GROUND COVER U S.F. 48,280 S.F. L ,a;~~:, CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1[ONOA ~,,_,'..\' . COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO `. "~ ; Srl'ATE OF CALII~ORNIA - N '_-~- ASSESSMEPI'~ DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.S ANNEXATION NO. 3 TURF ~~.".~ GROUND COVER YURF AREA 2,070 S.F GROUND COVER AREA 71,3A5 S.F. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANt;E DISTRICT NO.S ANNEXATION NO. 3 TURF GROUND COVER TURF A~ 4,300 S.F GROUND COVER AREA 21,730 S.F. ~,~~~ crrY of xAxcao cvcA~oxaA Tit i~~6o ,:~,~ , COUNTY OF 8AN HBANARDIxO `; `~ ~ S!'ATB OF CALII~OItMA - A T ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.S ANNEXATION NO. 3 TURF GROUND COVER TURF AREA GROUN COVER AREA 2~D9D S,F. 42.660 S.F. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE O15TRICT NO.S ANNEXATION NO. 3 7lils l~I~I 111 91 ~ W ,. I~ to s 9t 10 ~ 17 It - TUkF GROUND COVER ~ala ~1 ulu1w~ ~Ibl9lrl~lb b ~ r TURF AREA 6,200 S.F. GROUND COVER AREA 9,810 S.F. ~9;~~\\> c~r~r*sr~oF ~rtcxo cucwdoxo~ ~ s a~•• \ ~ WVn1j Q~ G7~L~ BiWl\ffiWY\~ ~: ` 3 ~~~ og cws.~oaxu - N ~,R-- b ------ CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA STAFF REPaRT DATE: April 20, 1988 T0: City Council and Ct tY Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 8Y: Jugy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE NORK IN CONNECTION KITH ANNEXATION N0. 13 FOR j DR 87-26 (PM 10782), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARRON ROUTE ANO ROCHESTER AVENUE TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 I RECDMIEIdITIOM: It is reccawended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 13 to Street Lighting Maintenance Distrlct No. 6 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKOROUNDlANALYSIS Attached for City Council aonrnvat ~~ ~o...,,,.~__ __.__,__ .~. connection with Annexation No. 13 tq Street Lighting Maintenance Distrlct No. 6 for DR 87-26 (PM 10782) located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue. The developer of the subJect pro3ect has been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88-149. Resp ~ ubmitted, w.f~~ Atrarhmen45 I RESOLUTION N0. ~'j ~ - ~_j I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE NORK IN CONNECTION NITH ANNEJ(ATION N0. 13 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR DR 87-26 (PM 10782) 16th dqy ofCMarcD,t1988,tadopt its Resolution offIntentlonuNo~88a150dtonorder the therein described work Tn connection with Annexation No. 13 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6, which Resolution of Intention No. 88-150 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and ResolutionMofEintent on,theadedp"NOtlceeof Iegreve~ntf,twaspdulygandflegaily posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file 1n the office of the City Clerk; and NHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duty mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88-150, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Cierk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. which catA rnninc ..e..e_ e.n.. ,,.,,_.._ . manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of~Pia111ng~onuflleatn the office of the City Cierk; and oral and dccumentaryjdconcerningcthehdurTsdictTon factsdinothiseproceedingcand concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired ,{urisdiction to order the proposed work. Rancho Cucamonga t~atlthespublicyi terestdand convenlenceurequiresttheCity of annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and sa!d City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No, 88-150, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer 1s hereby finally approved; a~-nd-- SECTION 3; The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's epor are hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tracts ave been occupied. 3S ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 Annexation No. 13 for OR 81-26 (PM 10782) SECTION 1. Authority far Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1912). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all to*_s within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be Vrovided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordi nary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on local streets as shown on the Lighting District Altos Map which is on file with the City Engineer. imnrovamn~t m +^tc ;;,aca '., wnaiuerea or general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3, Plans and SDecificat ions The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. a52 SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be inturred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, ft is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will 6e as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 is comprised of street light improvements on local streeks for ail •- institutional prn,iects throughout the Cit '~dustr tai, comnerci al and one acre of land in industrial, c y• It has been determined that derives the same benefit as two ass essment untd'tsnintresidentialezones. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Enerav Cost; No. of Lamps Lamb Si ze* Lamps - YTD Annex New L No 13 Total 5800E 4 -- z 9500L -" 47 "' 2 *High Pressure Sodium Vapor Tn4 =1 Lamp atze Lams Rate Mo' Total Annual s Maint. Cost 5800E 47 X E 8.93 % 9500E 2 12 55,036.52 X (10.16 X 12 _ - 243.84 Total Annual Maint. Cost 55,280.36 2. Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation 408 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 = 30.5 Total Assessment Uni ts 438.; 3. Cost per Asses s__ meat Unit. Total Annual Maintenance Cost No. o UmtS to tstrtct ES280,3'6 j12,12/year/unit Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6, 353 SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance 6istrict No. fi" Annexation No. 13, These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the t°xt cf this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Nhen units are based an acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a DTStrict and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. -• ''rcr; ,=al ~~I ouue, ine t,rry Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modff ies and approves the indiW dual assessments. ~' EXHIBIT "A" Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 13 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 6: P~o,',ect AcrEagE DR 87-26 (PM 10782) pcl 1 1.8 pcl 2 1.6 pcl 3 2.3 pct 4 2.6 pcl s z.l pcl 6 1,9 pcl 7 1,5 pcl 8 2,3 pcl 9 2.2 pcl 10 2,5 pcl 11 4.6 pcl 12 2.8 pct. 13 2.3 Totai 30,5 Assess. No. of 4amps to be Annexed Ont o&if'i4 L-- 9501 lb.-WUL T~~6L 4 --- -" '-- --' --- 3 --- -'- --- --' --- 5 --' -'- --- --- --- 5 --- --- °- --- --- 4 --- -~- --- --- --- 4 -'- -'- -'- --- --- 3 °-- '-- --- --- --- 5 --- --- -'- -" --- 4 --- --_ ___ __- '-- 5 -'- --- --' --- --- 9 --' --- --' --- '-- 6 --- --- --- --- --- 5 -__ ___ ___ ___ _-- 62 3 5s ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE 91STRICT NO. (o ANNEXATION NO. 13 4aaOW aou rE ~_ ,E, N ~ . -~ _ ,.1; _ ~ ~ i Il ~~ c ~h~ cJ~ i~~ ~J: __ _ ~~~ /~ ~I'~~~~ _ . s u',. s. s i __ ~.. :2 ,.~ :G _'_~: ~ W I -si ei- ~ / Y L ¢ `M1~' II --- CITI' OF RANCHO CI;CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1988 ~ ii T0: City Council and City Manager ~ FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer SY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 43 FOR DR 87-11, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 19TH STREET, EAST OF ~i HELLM4N AVENUE, TO LANDSCRPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 43 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 43 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for DR 87-11, located on ±he north side of 19th Street, east of Neuman - iJVCi c Subj ECL Mr 4J Cei. 16a ~Jccn nvi. iiiw vi Lim public hearing~~by mail. yThe attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88-151. Respect submitted, r l L ~ -~ RIIM: Attachments ~~/ RESOLUTION N0. 8 d ~ ~So~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PAN CHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITN ANNE%ATION N0. 43 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR DR 87-11 Wucprns the r;~,. Co .,..:r ., .ha 16th day of March, 1988, adopt its P,esolutionyof~Inte~ntionuNO.o88a152 tonorder the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 43 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 88-152 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and NHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed °Notice of Improvement°, was duly and legally posted in the tf me, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the i~rovements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88-152 according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucanonga, which said Copies were duly mat led in the time, form, and '.zq~ L =„ „y law, as appears rrom me Arrtdavtt of Mailing on file in the Doff ice of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefran and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work, SECTION 1; It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88-152 6e done and made; and crrTrnu o. n,. = it Turtiier resoived Thai the report filed 6y the Engineer ts~er~e y finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it further resolved that the assessments and method of assessment to t e Engineer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4; Be it finally resolved that said assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tracts have been occupied, ~J 3~8 CITY OF AANCNO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 ANNEXATION N0. 43 for DR 87-11 SECTION 1. Authorl ty for Report This report is in compitance with the requiren~nts of Article 4, Chapter ' Division 15 of the Streeis and Nlgnways Cude, State of California (landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new subdivisions into Landscape Malntertance District No. 1. The City Council has detenalned that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within OR 87-11 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on Lhe recorded Map as roadway right-of-way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The pions and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved 6y the City Engtneering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subiect tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of tAts report to the same extent as tf tarn nlanc ,,,A specrrrca lions were attached hereto. ~ '~' SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All improvemen*s will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (f.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance 01str1ct No. 1 including Annexation No. 43 is as follows: Existir Anne. Nw District No.43 Total Landscape Area 920,152 0 920,152 No. of D. U. 9,548 5 9,553 Per Lot Annual Assessment 920 1.- 5i~3~ f28.90 3s9 Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated 1n Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. Nhere the development covered by this annexation fnvolves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated for inclusion to the maintenance district but will be maintalred by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced. SECTION 5. Assessment Dlaaram A cosy of the eroposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled Exhibit A by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment isprovements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Mhere there is more than one dwelling unit per lot ar parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportlonai to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. The City Council will hoiQ a public hearing 1n June, to determine Lhe actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as rcquircd by the Landscape and Lighting Act o* 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 3, City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annez to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in Nay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a pu611c hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. ~~ Properties and lagroveaknts to be included within Annexation No. 43 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1: WIINTAINED AREA PR0.~ECT ~,~WUND COVER -_ DNiT- 3~'~F~t ~~-F~_ 3~a ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION N0. 43 s~ r~wr J F~ ~ ~'_ r ~' 1~ ~ _ , _ Mr /' ~ w. I ,-, ~~ I~~ _~ = ~ a.~.,,. ~ ~ ~~.~ ,.,....... f t ~~o. ' s "~~`^ CITY OF RANCHO Cl,'CA~~IONGA ~'y +~ ~ :. I ENG{NEERING DIVISION -" Sj 3 ~I VICINITY MAP nn n N - ------- CITI' OF RANCHO C[.'CAMONCA STAFF REPORT .,, DATE: April 20, 1988 ~ T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer ~~~ BY: Judy Acosta, Juai or Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE NORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 17 FOR DR 87-26 (PM 10782), LOCATED RT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND ROCHESTER RVENUE TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 RECpiMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 17 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and approving the Engineer's Report, BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 17 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 for DR 87-26 (PM 10782) located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue. The developer of the subJ ect pro,iect has been notified of the puhlic hearing by mail. The attached resolution also aAProves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88-153. Respec submitted, i ~ ~/~ ~~~~~ Y - RH Attachments 3~3 RESOLUTION N0. ~ ~~ a53 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CCNNECTI ON WITH ANNEXATION N0. 17 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 AND ACCEPT IHG THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR OR 87-26 ;PM 10182) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 16th day of March, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 88-154 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 17 to Landscape Maintenance Bistrict No. 3, which Resolution of Intention No. 88-154 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit cf Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as aDPears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real prooerty proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 68-154, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City ui nmiLiw 6u6baL'nya, which said copies were au~y maiiee in cne time, Torm, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1; It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamo~liat the public interest and convent en ce requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that, the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88-154 be done and made: and SECTION 2; Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer i~ he- re6y finally aDPr oved; and SECTION 3: 8e it further resolved that the assessments and method of assessment n t e Engineer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: Be it finally resolved that said assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tracts have been occupied. 'J ~}- CITY OF RANCHO CUCMN)NGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenanoe District No. 3 Annexation Na. 17 For DR 87-26 (PM 10782) SECTION i. Authority for Report This report is 1n caxgliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Nlyhways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments Into landscape Maintenance District No. 3. The City Council has determined the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all the developments as mentioned above. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed developments are shovm on the recorded Map as roadway right-of-way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ' SECTION 3. Plans and SDetiftcations The plans and landscaping are as stipulated to the conditions of apprcval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subtect development plan and the asseccmant eiagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual deveiopment is hereby made a part of th15 report to the same extent as 1f said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs Na costs will be incurred by the District for parkway and median improvement construction. A11 improvements will be constructed by developers and or/by the City. Based on historical data, contract analysts and developed work standards, 1t is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (f.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment wilt be based on actual cost data. landscape Mainte.^.a.^.ce District Nc. 3 has bEEn dEmaFCnLed ifiEd 4.ro vn_nac in_nn_ 1 is comprised of Parcel Map 7349, comprised of 8 parcels, totaling 6,057 square feet. The district was formed in October 5, 1983, for the maintenance of landscaping a detention basin and storm drain within the project. This zone will be assessed on per lot basis for the maintenance costs within the protect boundary only as stipulated in the Engineer's Report for the formation of the District. 345' Zone 2 is comprised of all other pro,iects that are being annexed or will be annexed to th/s District. All lots or parcels within Zone 2 will be assessed on net acre basis for the maintenance of landscaped median islands on Haven Avenue fros 4th Street to Deer Creek CAannel, Foothill Boulevard and 4th Street from west to east City limit, Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue, from 4th Street to Foothill Douievard, 6th Street from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue and median islands on other major divided highways and some parkwAys within the Industrial Specific Plan Areo and Foothill Boulevard overla0~ area. The estimated cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 including Annexation No. 17 is as follows. Zone 1 Existing District Total estimated maintenance cost 52,070 Assessment units 8 Total cost - assessment unit for year and month 5270 = f258.15/year or 521.56/mo./lot Zone 2 Existing Annexation New District No. 17 Total local estimatee annum maintenance area - Sq. Fc. 0 0 0 Assessment units, acres 3&1,601 30.5 380,632.5 Total cost s assessment unit for year and month ~x~~ S D /year 0 /mo./acre Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated 1n Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. SECTION 5. Assessment Diacram A cony of the orgpgsed assessment diagram is attac!rd to this rtDOrt and iabeiea 'txnibit A", by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. 31o so SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and Lhat assessment shall be equal for each parcel for Yone 1 and shad De equal to the nex4 acreage for each lot or parcel in Zone 2. The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs Incurred by the City during the p*evioas fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 1. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Mnez to District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and deterwlnes to Annax to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in Nay, the Ctty Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5, Every year in June. the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the 1rd1v1dual assessments. 3 ~7 Properties and lagrovsxaents to be included within Annexation No. 17 (Zane 2) t0 Landscape Maintenance D1strlct No. 3: PROPERTIES PROJECT ~~~ DR 87-24 (PM 10782) pcl 1 1.8 pcl 2 1.6 pcl 3 2.3 pct 4 2.6 Pcl 5 2.1 Pcl 6 1.9 Pct 7 1.5 pcl 8 2.3 pct 9 2.2 pcl 30 2.5 pCl 11 4.6 pcl 12 2.8 pcl 13 2.3 30,5 IMPROVEMENT AREAS TO BE ANNEXED IN ANNEXATION N0. 1 Area SG• Ft• Haven Avenue p Foothill Boulevard 0 M!lliken Avenue r 4th Street p Rochester Avenue 0 6th Street 0 3~g ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. ,3 ANNEXATION N0. !7 dNAOW FOVTE _ _,_~~ -j_-___-~-rJ?l.a_-r: r__-__~ - W i i -' ssa__,~~~ awn ,_ _ rc' W ~ .: Q ~ r Q rN.c p r.. _ sS .i4~ ? r.. ~ l ~I T,II ~ '^~' 1 .veg. ar si'rr EI ~~~..i rlri l i~t.ar is'rr _~. ~- r ~.. I _~. o r y I p ~, _ - ~. . u r - -- . ~ -~- . ~ :~°. ~~ _ Q ~: /rrtt~ CS ,3j• 'J'~ c'1 ~ ~ _ _ _ -- C W i iti ~ .•d w_ _ ~lC~~~p o°r/-~ `^,. CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~~IONGA _^ " ~z ENGINEERING DIVISION ~~ ~~' VICINITY MAP 11 nn CITY OF RANCHO C~CA~IONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1988 ~ ~ T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer ~~ BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITN ANNEXATION N0. 3 FOR TRACT NOS. 12643, 13555, 13556, 13558, 13560, 13561 AND 13563 (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE '! DISTRICT N0. 6 It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 3 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS M LLG~.IICU IVI LILY 1.1/1111 ~.II ayyi ~vai 1] q IC]V IUIIV~I VI VCI Illy LIIC I~VIn I11 connection with Annexation No. 3 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 for Tract Nos. 12643, 13555, 13556, 13558, 13560, 13561 and 13563 (Caryn Planned Community). The developer of the sub,lect tracts has been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved b.y Resolution No. 88-155. Respectful ubmitted, / Jas RHM:JA: w / At t acha~ar~ is 370 RESOLUTION No. 8 S ~ ~ S7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEI(AT ION N0. 3 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OISTRI CT N0. 6 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 12643, 13555, 13556, 13558, 13560, 13561 and 13563 (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) HHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 16th day of March, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 88-156 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 3 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 6, which Resolution of Intention No. 88-156 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Res o7ution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and HHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adopt ton of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons caning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88-156, according to the names and addresses of such owners as ~iie same appears on the last mat ltng or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the •j urisdictfon facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga t at the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and docrr+.ben in sa;n Res nl:.'tio.^. of iiiteiiiimi N0. da-156, be done and made; and SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it further resolved that the assessments and method of assessmen .n a ngineer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: Be it finally resolved that said assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tracts have been occupied. i ~~- 3'I I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District Ne. 6 (Caryn P.C.) Annexation No. 3 far Tracts 12643, 13555, 13556, 13558, 13560, 13561, 13563 SECTION I. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Niahways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new subdivisions into Landscape Maintenance District No. 6. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots w/thin Tracts 12643, 13555, 13556, 13558, 13560, 13561, 13463 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. A11 landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right-of-wqy or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the sub,Tect tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact Location of 4he landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is ho rehv ~Ae a nart of thle rennr4 to }ho e~m sWnn1 se Ii ea1A n1>n~_ aed specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. A11 improvements will be eonstructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed aork standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (f.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based an actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 including Annexation No. 3 is as follows: rr;e4;nn ann - ~.,.. District No. 3 Total Landscape Area 889,205 253,055 1,114,2ti0 No. of 0. U. 896 298 1,194 Per Lot Annual Assessment 1 114 260 x .30 = 1~- 279,96 f23.33 ~- 372 Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated to Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. Where the development covered by this annexation involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, whicA are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram A co¢y of the eroposed assessment diagram 1s attached to tA1s report and labeled Exhtbit A by this reference the Diagram is hereby incorporated within the :ext of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit W all lots within the District and that assessment shalt be epual for each unit. where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcei shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. The City Counctt will hold a public hearing 1n June, W determine the actual assessments based upon the actwl costs incurred by the Ctty during the previous fiscal year which arc to be recovered through assessments as rcQulred by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTIDN T. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intentlpn to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers alt testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. 373 Properties and iayrovea~ents to be included within Annexation No. 3 to Landscape Maintenance Dittrlct No. 6: IMINTAINED AREA TRACT ON STREET- UND COYER Sa: Ft. T-Ff- 12643 49 Netherlands Yiew Loap - 30,440 13555 47 8anyon St/ Sierra Crest View Loop 7,275 55,795 13556 40 Banyon St./ Sierra Crest View Loop - 48,280 13558 52 5lerra Crest View Loop 2,070 22,345 13560 23 Vintage Drive 4,300 21,730 13561 43 Netherlands Y1ew Loop 2,030 42,660 13563 44 6,i 9,840 21,965 231,090 3 ? ~}- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 ANNEXATION N0.3 x sl • !s io -... e ~~ u v ' so n s n ~ +~ xo I is ~ ~ ~._., ~t e n ~» u u is x~ a a a ~ max slul u - TURF TURF AREA GROUND COVER 0 S.F. GROUND COVER AREA 30,410 S.f. cw ,a?``""'~^, CITY OF RA~`CHO CL'CA,~IONGA w ~ - /` i ~!, C4;, =: i ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY ~1AP 11 „r ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM IANOSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. (o ANNEXATION N0.3 ZO x9 1 n to to xo xt xx zz ~ zs xo is is is tz tz tt to ~ ~ ~ ae . s e ~ e s ~ ~ ~ at ~ ~ ~ ~ x t u ~ ' a w u 'H ® TURF TURF AREA GROUND COVER 'AREA 0 GROUND COVER 7~~75 S.F. 55,705 S.F. ~ CITY OF RA`CHO Cl.'C.'+,~IOtiGA 3,L" ~~t^~.. i3'!~r~; '~ ; ENGINEERING DIVISION ~ T c E _,_ 1\,i4 VICINITY 11AP in ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 'v ANNEXATION N0.3 TURF GROUND COVER TURF AREA 0 S.F. GROUND COVER AREA 48,240 S.F. ~~c~„n . °- "'°' CITY OF RA`CHO Cl.'CA.~IONGA s' " ~ '_ i ENGINEERING D11'ISIOV ' VICINITY ~tAP i~r ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. !o ANNEXATION N0.3 'I'lalfl~l31= a I/olnl lxlull9~lsl/alli ~~I~Ix6~~I~I~i~1p 119 ?s 1391711 ~13a 131~3f'36 ® TURF GROUND COVER GROUND COVER AREA Y1,345 S.F. ~~ c ~ Rio ~.?'~ ""''^, CITY OF RA\CHO Cl.'CA,~IOtiGA ~'~ EvclueERl~c ~IVlslov ~ T ' ~'ICINlTY ~1AP lv ~/,• 52' f/I WINIµ ,~~ M ~~I ~llul"I" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. ~O ANNEXATION N0.3 ~`~~!~t„ ~+?- " CITY OF RAtiCHO CL'C,~,~IONCA } ,`~' = - ;, ~' i EVGiNEERIXG DI~'ISIOV ~ T ~'~ ' "v'ICItiITY '`lAP 1\,II ~~n ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. ~ ANNEXATION N0.3 - TURF GROUND COVER TURF AREA 2,030 S.F GROUND COVER AREA 4T,b80 S.F, ,~4%`~~`n'^, CITY OF RANCHO Cl'C~+~.~IOI~iGA w ~ ~! ~ / \ _, ~ i ENGINEERING DIVISION ~ T ' VICINITY S1AP 1\`ll n~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. (o ANNEXATION N0.3 7I1I6I1I~I Z~1 ~ 11 s 71 10 11 If N M 12 77 ~ 10 x u ~ s1>,a rao ai y x~ 1s ~_~,,,.,.,~„ 10 1~~ ~ iI lro~m xllaalnixa asiml - TURF TURF AREA UND COVER AREA GROUND COVER 6,4D0 S.F. 0,810 S.F, ,`J~.~~~M, CITY OF RANCHO Cl.'CA,~IOI~GA //A\\ ~ ~~~ O '4~' ~ EVGINEERI\G D11'ISION E'er VICINITY J1AP Hn ----- CITY OF RANCHiJ CI:CAbtONGA STAFF REPORT Date: April 20, 1988 ~ _ , To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer j i By: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer Subject: Recommendation to establish speed Limits on Jasper Street, j Roberds Street, Victoria Street and Mil son Avenue RECONEIDATIOM; s recommen d that Section 10.20.010 and 10.20.020 of the Municipal Code De amended to provide far speed limits of 30 NPH on Jasper Street between 19th Street and Roberds Street; a 30 MPN speed limit on Roberds between Jasper Street and Carnelian Avenue; a 35 MPH speed limit on Victoria between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue; a 45 MPH speed limit on H115on 6etweer. Amethyst Avenue and Naven Avenue; a 40 MPH speed limit on Mil son between Haven Avenue and 200 feet east of Canlstel Avenue. BACK8tOb1D/AMALTSIS• Continuing surveillance of streets in the City has resulted in conducting traffic and engineering surveys for the purpose of establishing speed limits according to Sections 22357, 22358 and 40801-40805 of the California Vehicle Code. the Vehlcie Code allows cities to set speed limits of other than 25 MPH or 55 MPH in accordance with such surveys to order to more precisely esiah11e6 «~ .. _.y-~~cb;~ a„~ prudent` speed wnicn is required under basic State speed law. This speed then becomes the Das1s for enforcement, eliminating the extreme discretion which otherwise could occur. Such a survey, less than 5 years old, is also required where radar 1s used for enforceaent. Surveys as required above have been conducted on the aforementioned streets. The surveys involved the determination of the prevailing speed of existing traffic 6y the use of radar, an analysis of the recent accident hl story and a search far any conditions not apparent to drivers which would require a reduced speed. The results of these surveys are summarized 1n the attached table. After review of these results, Tt was found that the safety record of the streets are within expected levels except for Jasper Street and there are no unusual conditions mot apparent fin dr!Vers Thus, excepi for Jasper SEreei, the observed prevailing speeds must be the predominant consideration in determining the speed limit. The Jasper Street speed limit warrants a 5 MPH reduction under the prevailing speed due to its safety record. 38Z CCSR Re: Speed Limits April 20, 1988 Page 2 CONCLUSION: A speed limit should be established that would be considered reasonable by most of the drivers on tF,e street and still provide for effective enforcement. A speed 11sit such as this is set at, in sort cases, the first 5 MPH lncresent Del ow what 85 percent of the speeds drivers are doing. The proposed speed lisits will be exceeded by 8 to 30E of the drivers observed, except Por Jasper Street where about 50i of drivers are exceeding 30 I~H, thus these limits should provide an effective tool for law enforcement. Jasper Street will require an on-going enforcement effort to reduce the speeds and increase safety. Respectfully bmitted, i - ~K..,~-~-.a-.~ R :PAR:pai--- cr. Clyde Boyd, Chairman - Pab11c Safety Cosatssion I,LLGI.I,III'IIL 383 LW~AIW: ~}~i>i`2 ~ ''. yzyz >¢¢yVy ~Wy6' 0~I ~~' =~'' :~g¢, :~,~ iNim'. ;`. ~~~~ ~i #~~~'. ;~a~. 1 aW N ~ GW i ~~~~' •O W ia~~. . ~, :~~w a m~ ~~o r^W Y~ o xa .off 9 ~g ~ r ~ wu YZx? :S NN N N N N N N p -TO H p p p p ~ OTOT NSO O OOON -- - Pte.,., i amo 0 000 f........_ .................._ ~ NNN P 0 0~ ~ NNN m 1 1 Tm~l ~1 I N~pT TT T I q n I TAM1N •I f f ~pp , NN~ p ~ N q ( y m ~~I1T 66 6 LiOa L i ^~~5 ~ r~ff ry N 4YY ~88 I ~o'N ~p Pm 00 N ~K6 W n0 1 ~ 0'6 n a' S ~2: '. =>: F k'~Y~ ~p ~O~ppg~p Nm !-I`0m0m N.J m i tt]~~i o~ n i +r . 'i'o ie .`, +i i Rio Yy v :QO~ x~ i- n Q c ~ .. i i _~ ~:~° _ ~ u .UU,~a. %~N' €w V KN ~~ff rW.Y W+ N loll W W=a ~3~ :o +i •9 CC 0~ x O n Q ~~ e F ` y U ~ K VV ~ O ~~ ~ ~ a a $s ~ .< o ~ €. 9 °;~ ~~ so; o 4 ~ r n a ~ ff S a v~,. J n ~ c... ~. J~• ~~k~ ° ggM1 VV bm g~ ~ tg '~wi6 ~ ~ ~ s~ ~:~a y Ip 3 W ~ ~ w 99 C ~~ ~ L w •y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V y P yy 9 ~C C~T ~ O ``L ` 6~j[ @ b~ ~ ea ~ Gfr e a~ ~ ^.~o ~~~~~ "8 ~~'".. l L U n eS m Os a no y o x,. ~m m O 6~PT N O N U1 N-~ xx 2 ~~ ~ x ~ xx:z ~~~~ 00 o a v-co n 6 ~ G a ! M O i a r 5 E ~, ' ~' o o so i ~ c~ oe s- i 7 a s <- i L I E u~ xi ~i oa n°~ SrL? ix= #~~ ~~e 3`" ~fi:i S ORDINANCE N0. 3 7 Y AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, SECTION 10.20.010 AND SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE, REGARDING PRIW1 FACIE SPEED LIMITS UPON CERTAIN CITY STREETS A. Recitals (i) California Vehicle Code Section 22357 provides that this City Council may, by ordinance, set prima facie speed limits upon any portion of any street not a state highway. (ii) The City Traffic Engineer has conducted an engineering and traffic survey, of certain streets within the City of Rancho Cucamonga which streets as specified 1n Part B of this Ordinance. (iii) The determinations concerning prima facie speed limits set forth in Part B, below, are based upon the engineering and traffic survey identified 1n Section A (ii ), above. B. Ordinance NOM, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLONS: Section I "~" `"=La '+ anim~ieu Lu Lia nancno iucamonga b~ty Code to read, in words and figures, as follows: 10.20.010 Increasing state speed limit in certain zones. It is determine~d~y City Counc reso u on an upon a an engineering and traffic investigation that the speed permitted by state law upon the following streets 1s less Lhan is necessary for safe operation of vehicles thereon by reason of the designation and sign posting of the streets as through highways and (or) by reason of widely spaced intersections, and it is declared that the prima facie speed limit shall be set forth in this section on those streets or parts of streets designated 1n th15 section when signs are erected gluing notice thereof: Declared Prima Facie Name of Street or Portion Affected Sceed Limit fMPHI Amethyst Street - Baseline to end 35 385 CCSR Ordinance January 20, 1988 page 2 2. Arrow Route - Grove to Baker 45 3. Beryl Street - Base Line to 800' north of Lemor, Avenue 40 4. Hellman Ave. - Alta Lana Drive to 500' north of Manzanita Drive 35 5. Jasper Street - frm l9th Street to Reberds 3O 6. Lemon Ave. -Beryl St. to Archibald Ave. 35 7. Lemon Ave. - Sapphire St. to Jasper St. 35 8. Ninth Street - Grove to Baker 35 9. Rmaona Avenue -Foothill Bivd. to 19th St. 35 10. Sapphire Street - Leman to Banyan 40 11. Yineyard Avenue -Carnelian to Church 40 {Ord. 169 S1(part), 1992: Ord. 39B S1, 1980: Ord. 49 55.0, 1978) (i) The twenty-five (25) miles per hour speed does not facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic. (11) The miles per hour as stated are the prima facie speeds which are most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of Lraffic and are speed limits which are reasonable and safe on said streets or portions thereof. (iii) The miles per hour stated are hereby declared to be the prima facie speed limits on said streets. (iv) The Traffic Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to Tnstail appropriate signs upon said streets giving notice of the prima facie speed limit declared herein. Section 2 Section 10.20.020 hereby is amended to the Rancho Cucamonga City Code to read, Tn words and figures, as follows: 10.20.020 Decrease of state low maximum s eed. It is determined by City Counc reso u on an upon as s o an eng veering and traffic investigation that the speed permitted by state law is greater than is reasonable or safe under the condtttons found to exist upon such streets, and it is declared that the prima facie speed limit shall be as set forth in thl< Seiafim nn thnm <r neer~ ... ...-~. -s .~___._ ._.. .. -' - ~~ rte, eo ~~ o~rxew uesi gnated In this seCt100 MFN!n CCSRs are erected gluing notice hererof: Ordinance 3g(~ CCSR Ordinance January 20, 1988 Page 3 Declared Prima Facie Name of Street or Portion Affected Speed Limit (MPH) 1. Archibald Avenue -Banyan to North end 50 2. Archibald Avenue -Fourth Street to Banyan Street 45 3. Arrow Route - Baker to Haven 45 4. Banyan Street frao Beryi Street to London Avenue 35 5. Banyan Street - fraa west City limits to Beryl Street 40 6. Base Line Road - Carnelian to Haven 40 7. Base L1ne Road - Hermosa to Haven 45 8. Base Line Road - Nest City limits to Carnrelian 45 9. Beryl Street - Banyan t0 end 45 10. Beryl Street - 800' north of Lemon to Banyan 40 il. Carnelian Street - Foothill to end 45 12. Center Avenue -Foothill Blvd. to Church Street 40 13. Church Street - from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue 40 14. Church Street -Haven to Elm 40 15. Eighth Street - Grove to Haven 45 i6 c~~,-,^.''~ ":L~.: - w iii yi~i miu ~ ~ V7 17. Foothill Grove Avenue - Eighth to 40 18. Haven Avenue - Highland to M11son 50 19. Heilman Avenue - Foothill to Alta Loma Dr. 35 20. Hellman Avenue - 500' north of Manzanlta to Valley V1ew 40 21. Hellman Avenue - 6th to Foothill 45 22. Hermosa Avenue - Base L1ne Road to Nilson Ave. 45 23. Henaosa Avenue - Ni15on to Sun Valley Dr. 40 24. Highland Avenue - Amethyst to Archibald 35 25. Highland Avenue - from Arc hiDald Avenue Lo Hermosa Avenw 35 26. Highland Avenue - from Hersiosa Avenue to 800' west of Haven 45 27. H11151de Road - from Ranch Gate to R~thyst Street 35 397 CCSR Ordinance January 20, 1988 Page 4 26. Lemon Avenue -Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue 40 29. Leman Avenue -Jasper St. to Beryl St. 35 30. Ninth Street - Baker Ave. to Archibald Ave. 40 31. Roberds Street - Jasper to Carnelian Ave. 30 32. Rochester Are. - Foothill Bivd. to Base Line Road 50 33. San Bernardino Road - from Vineyard Avenue to Archibald Avenue 35 34. Sapphire Street - Banyan to end 45 35. Sapphire Street - 19th to Lemon 40 36. Spruce Avenue -Elm Avenue to Base Line Rd. 40 37. Terra Yista Parkway -Church to Bel pine 40 38. Turner Avenue -Eighth to foothill 45 39. Turner Avenue (Hermosa Ave.) - Foothill to Base Line Road 45 40. Victoria Street - Archibald Ave. to Ramona 35 41. Yictoria Street - from Etiwanda Avenue to Route 15 40 42. Victoria Park Lane 35 43. Victoria Nlndrows Loop (north 8 south) 35 44. Vineyard Avenue - Church to Base Line Rd. 40 45. Vineyard Avenue -from 8th Street t0 Foothill Blvd. 45 46. Nhittram Avenue - Etiwanda to east City 41m1LS 4U 47. Mil son - Amethyst Ave. to Archibald Ave. 45 48. Nilson -Haven Ave. to 200 feet east of Canistel Ave. 40 (Ord. 169 Section I (part), 1482: Ord. 34 Section 5.1, 1918). Rancho Cucamonga 5/82 124 (i) Both sixty-five (65) miles per hour and fifty-five (55) miles per hour are speeds which are more than are reasonable or safe; (11) The miles per hour as stated are the prima facie speeds which are most appropriate to farilltate the orderly movement of traffic and are speed limits which are reasonable and safe on said streets or portions thereof: 3g8 CCSR Ordinance January 20, 1998 Page 5 (iii) The miles per hour stated are hereby declared to be the prima facie speed limits on said streets; and (iv) The Traffic Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to install appropriate signs upon said streets giving notice of the prima facie spend li;ntt declared herein. Section 2 The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. Section 3 The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once to The Daii Re rt, a newspaper of general circulation published 1n Lhe City of n ar o, a ornia, and circulated in Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of January, 1988. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: enn s u yor RTTEST: every u e e y e I, BEVERLY A. AUTNELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a reauldr meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held en the 2Oih day of January irs6, and was finaiiy passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 20th day of January, 1988. Executed this 20th day of January, 1968 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. very u e e y er 3~9 ~aa a yr nnrv vaav a.~t,ranavivvn MEMORANDUM DATE: April 14, 1988 T0: Mayor and City Council ~', FROM: Mark R. Lorimer, Sr. Administrative Aseietant /'~ S1IBSECf: Letter Regarding Telephone Directory Designation Attached for your consideration is a draft letter for the Mayors signature regarding the City/Community name to be designated in future GTe Cal ifornie telephone directories. The letter indicates that residents may choose arty one of the following Community names -- Alto Lome, Cucamonga or Etiwanda -- simply by returning a special Bello t. Those not returning a Bel lat will automatically be referenced in Che directory with the Rancho Cucamonga de eignacion. The City Council ie asked co review the letter and approve it for the ins ~• o rbu ....c ...... .. ~.L.. ............ Should you have any qua a[ione or comments regarding th ie letter, please feel free to contact Lauren Wesaermen or Mark Lorimer. MRL/mrl attachment 3°~O April 15 1988 near Resident: The City of Rancho Cucamonga and GTE California are working cooperatively to improve information provided in your telephone ditectcry~ and we need your input regarding [he lia Ling of your residential or 6usinees address and telephone number in future directories. Curre¢t ly such information ie lie tad with your addreea and telephone number, along with one of the following city/m®unity names - Rancho Cucamonga, Alta Lome Cucamonga: or Etiwanda. Moe[ people traditionally search the directory for the city in which a resident lives or a 6uaineea ie located. Such a single city lie ling has not been the case in Rancho Cucamonga, and this has caused a certain amount of confusion. At the same limn, the City end CTE recognise Chat it ie important to many residents [o have the choice of an individual community identity or a city lie Bing. To rr twin your current lietin¢, eimoly indicate the name of the city/community on the enc lowed ballot end return it no later than Jmly 15. 1988. If qou choose to be lie [ed ae Rancho Cucamo¢ga~ simply discard the ba llot~ and you will be lie led in future dizec for ies with the Rancho Cucamonga des igna lion. You need return the ba 1LOC card only rt you wteh ro retarn alra ioma~ ~ucamonga~ ur Etiwanda as your co®unity addreea (theca community names will be retained in directory ass ie lance). Ae pert of this ballot procese~ GTE California will no[ charge for any changes made to the city/co®unity name you choose. Such changes will be in effect Oc tober~ 198$. Changing [he city/community name will not effect your poe tal service listing since [he U.S. Postal Service xeliee on a specific cip code end not the name of a city or community. This change ie limited only [o the GTE directory. The Ci[y of Rancho Cucamonga and GTE California wish to thank you for making your choice of directory deeigmtion. If you have queatione or concerns rage rd ing telephone directory listings please contact a GTE Customer Reprcaen[a live (residence 1-800-482-6701 or bueineee I-800-482-6702). S incereiy~ Dennis L. Stout Mayor DLS :b ae enclosure ~~I ~~ ~ ~ JAN ES ~. MPPMM IV A .~FEVI V PPG.vrvSni VO.F G NAN BOM1 u CPP.G =UX v Ai~rA JO GEi S'-EF NVMOEG 9NE HIV IC CE NTE3 C:RE LE F C BG%1053 9P LA. CA LIFOU NIA 92622-1059 1>'i n' 9 -ELE R~.'JNE 9C-L 9C1 12 ~i~ 69'-36'~~ MEMORAPIDUM TO: Beverly Authelet, City Clerk /p//~. FROM: Andrew V. Arczynski, Assistant City Attorney DATED: April 7, 1988 RE: ATST Communications of California, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization, County of San Bernardino, City of Rancho Cucamonga, et al Sacramento Superior Court No. 500802 and American Telephone and Telegraph Company - Interstate Division v. State Board of Equalization, County of San Bernardino, City of Rancho Cucamonga, et al. Sacramento Superior Court No. 500803 This correspondence will serve as our report with respect to the above-captioned matter. As you will recall, in past years, the City had an obligation to provide notice to the County that it had been served with lawsuits requesting tax refunds and, specifically, to request the County Counsel's Office to defend such matters. Effective LTanuary 1, 1988, the law now provides that the County is to be served with the lawsuits and is presumed to act on behalf of the cities for which it collected taxes. The City may, pursuant to California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 5148, "opt out" of the litigation insofar as representation by the County Counsel's Office. Stated otherwise, the City does have the choice, in accordance with the provisions of California Revenue and Tavahin ~_1 n_ .~G .i n_f.. _..i: ...~ i4r...1F _.. ___...^. ...y ~~ i- tY.e i tigatiGD ac Gpk,JSCu to`havingythe~matter~defended~byythe Covnty~COUnsel's Office on the city's behalf. our analysis of the State law in this area, indicates that the City's relatively low level of involvement in the matter would militate against the city retaining its own counsel to defend the matter. Accordingly, we recommend that the City council, by minute action, direct your office to correspond with the County Counsel's office evidencing the City 3°12 Memorandum to: Beverly Authelet April 7, 1988 Page Two of Rancho Cucamonga's intent to continue the representation of the County Counsel's Office in the above-referenced matters. of course, in accordance with the provisions of the California Revenue and Taxation code, representation of the City's interests by the County will require that the City pay its pro-rata share of the costs and expenses of litigation, including attorneys fees. However, based upon the large number of entities in the County (virtually all) appearing in the matter, it would appear that the city's exposure to such expenses would be particularly as compared to having independent counsel represent the City. For all of the foregoing reasons, we recommend the City Council permit the County Counsel's office to defend the matter on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Please provide the City council a copy of this memorandum for its next City Council meeting in order that it may take a position on the matter. AVA:ljl L\137\MEMOHEV\R.C. 15E 3q3 / .. ,. .. CALIFORNIANS FOR PARKS & WILDLIFE 909 12th Street, Suite 2Q8 H('7-~'/~ Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 448-1786 Tw A/•.G~YMMIYa ~„~,,,,°„•,,,,,,r,,,, F; March 14, 1988 4iMm~• M1n •M 14°~tlm NM' p4n• Gb, 4~Nwti "•^^^°aiO Oaiv'"^9i ~1°' Dear Members of the City Council, .., a.°°u.A.w,~,..., wm wnan.i,w ami, xuar m~ 4.a mw ~•',~.~ Proposition 70, the Wildlife, Coastal and Park ~•'°°'a Wpini °°"" Land Bond Act is a statewide measure to preserve oa.~°r. a w,na, em.~w~e.mu.a.na California's magnificent wildlife habitat, coast, °i'"°'n9 NMNi "'nt 6otliry parks and open space lands. &776 million dollars will e.n. w c~."w a c~•+m u„,,,,,,.,°~ be alloted to various projects if the initiative passes ..°a. e. a°M an.°. in June. •.,. ". ~..P. f/4M•YN M ~.,.,,.ma~ Proposition 70 will provide each city Per Capita i.yia b~crar~uien ,.ra, as ~,,, ~,,,,.,.,.. funds which may be spent however you deem appropriate "~"~°^ for parks and recreation purposes. Certain cities with `.,,"°Y„`~,„;,;nOMw,s,,.", larger populations may also benefit from RoDertl-2'Berg a~w wwac".v"w~ Harris funds. A list of the amount allocated for your w... Mn°c,.i r.amana city is enclosed. nnw•nn~• a.m"ae rn.wa".r or. ~ This ballot measure Ss the onl one of its kind y N~•°•` ••""•• We believe that that will appear on the June ballot ,,,`°w;°•„'"" ~ this is the only fundin possible for park and ~w.•.,<s". r~ada rarreetion nurooasa this veer. Your avooort for ~ "'M' °, °"°"" Proposition 70 is extremely vital to ensure funding for ,,, b,,, a,, „ "•w,n.rw~ the statewide preservation of our parks and wildlife. a.w~a •..w.v. o.r~ cws• For this reason we era seeking your city's endorsement ,,,,, aW ~,,,,n ti~W~ . Enclosed Se a packet of information regarding ~' Proposition 70, and a list of other cities, ...« legislators and groups supporting the initiative. If e,,a°""o,,,, you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ~~~~° call. Thank you very much for your cooperation. a.n. wn ~... o~ as Sincerely, _.... _ a-",mow: %~ ~„~,""" Gerald H. Meral o+••" r`rniw ~ Campaign Director uw.. wn M• VYMy "y Y tlb u M CM• MnY 11•Nu TW ~,.~.,. .3 q4 i o, nrao.o y' u CALIFORNIANS FOR PARKS & WILDLIFE 909 12th Stree!, Swte 203 Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 448 1', 86 1,j~S ~ PROPOSITION 70 The California Wildlife, Coastal and Park Land Bond Act The California Wildlife, Coastal and Park Land Bond Act is a statewide measure that will preserve California's magnificent wildlife habitat, coast, parks and open space lands. If passed by the voters this June, Proposition 70 will provide funds to permanently preserve these lands throughout California. our wildlife, park and coastal lands are absolutely essential to the quality of life in our state. These lands are disappearing at an increasingly rapid rate, and we must act now if we want to preserve California's unique and irreplacable natural heritage. The initiative will provide funds for the following purposes: State Park System $153 million Regional and Local Parks $336 million Wildlife habitat protection $129 million Trout and Salmon habitat $17 million Coastal protection $85 million Santa Konica Mountains $30 million Historic preservation jti minion Trails, IIrban streams, Urban forestry $15 million About two-th irds of the funds will be used to acquire land. one-third of the funds will be used to develop park and recreation areas and to restore or enhance wildlife habitat. Funds will be available to build trails, provide public access and facilities for public use, restore historical resources, and protect endangered species habitat. Proposition 70 is supported by a statewide coalition of more than 200 business, conservation and civic groups as the only means of preserving these lands. The State Legislature failed to pass three bills in 1986 that would have provided funds to preserve these lards, and no other funding sources are likely. over 21,000 volunteers collected over 735,000 signatures in 1987 to qualify Proposition 70 for the ballot. CALIFORNIANS FOR PARKS AND WILDLIFE (sponsor of Proposition 70) is now working throughout California to ensure that this vitally important measure passes in June. We need your help in this local landmark effort to pass Proposition 70. Wa welcome and encourage you to join local campaign efforts in your area. For more information, contact Californians for Parks and Wildlife at 909 12th Street, Suits 203, Sacramento, CA 95814, 916-448-1786. 3°I S .o ix B ~ 3~k a ~' ~ c '~ c F~ ~ ~~99 ~ EyB o 0 8~ ~ y 6~ r 6~ ~ g ~ .~3 s~ ~9~~~ `~~`~y~9 gl~~pgggE ~q 8 5$~ ~ m m~ ~E ~5~~~ a 6~~'~g y tE'g a ,~ E ~ F q~~~' ~~ ~~ ~4~ y g~~~$ ~ ~5B c ~9 E y e €~~~ A e k" 9 ~BE 8E o tl~ ~~°~~ '~ 5 S F ~ g 8~ ~y g ~ ~Pe''o 3 r ~ tt ~ "s ~ 6 ~_ ~ B a a SE ~ ` ~~ yE~~E Eo ~e~2 Yj i~ ~tl ff $ &6 ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ a ~~ ~5~~~ ~^ ~: ~~9 a ~{~~ ~~§66y v' ~~~~~. i ~ ~ i~ ~~ A ~ ~2 e 3~~ 6 ~A~ 6 ~° ° ~ ° =~a~$ ~ era ~~ ~ ~~ ' ~ LL ~ap~~ ad g Eys ~ ~~ g g ~~~ Y ~ ~~d eg t zg ~ x 3 E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~p~xg4 og € a ~ ~~~ o ~5~ a ~ S ,; e g n _ ~~ V~~ a F ~~` r o~esk = ~a ° ~ ~ 4 ~sf Saar y °6B fi $E ~ s a,v u ~~ab Y ~' " 5=~ Fp° a-az a ap~~ p g~ o y .g 88 o Y B w C pp c A~j }J y aE V N G Zggxy~ i .~.y ) 4 S ~'3O3 b.Q R QD~ i ~9g i ~ 23g ~ i+ f•[ n v Y?~ ~ Y~Y n' Rw n ~i "I ~(j CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1988 T0: Members of the City Council PROM: Dennis L. Stout Mayor SUDJECT: Tri-Co®unity Deritege G~MD r~ ~9 ~~ A F~' ~ 2 U'. 1977 Laat month I requested staff [o draft a resolution recognizing the hie toric e ignificance of the tri-community heritage. At the March 16th city council meeting, Memb era of the Council stated that they thought similar or related re eo lotions which unde recored the importance of the legacies of each co®unity had previously been adapted. There are several policies in the General Plan that refer to each of the common itiea and a sec [ion that epee ifica lly mentions preserving the individual character of each community. In addition, at its January 2, 1985 meetinR~ [he City Council voted to approve street identification eigne with each community's identity printed on the eigne in letters ae large es poeeib le. No other resclu [ions or references sere located. Dewed on this additional informations I am submitting the following resolution which incorporates the sec Lien of the General Plen that refers [o the individual chazec ter of each community. Aleo~ please note a further refinement of the last sec [ion of Che rasa lotion. e amended reso lotion incorporating the prey iou sly referenced changes ie [ached along with a copy of the original re eo to ti on for reference. S:baa tachmente CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA MEMORANDUM August 6, 1984 TUs City Manager and City Council FAON: Robert A. ASzzo Assls Gant to City Manager SUBJECT: Cos®unity Identity Street Signs The Adalso^q Comalaaion at a recent meeting voted ~~^~a~a^ualy to recommend that the City Council consider s standaM atreot sign for tF.e CSty. Their suggestion was to have the atreot signs w11th all capital letters, block location, green background, and with reflective white lattering. Also, the CSty logo should appear on these signs with the SdenLity of each of the coc®unitiea as ahcx.^. below G~ t~ 7 ~. Y t ~ `r. a1.a Coma AAA:mk G~ ~~ 1 ~' 1 s ~.1 ~l ~ a Z Cucamonga C~ N~'~h t'~ 'f :~_ - ~ 9 2 i E[iwanda 19:' ,p ~~ 'Sc '1` ~ 1 y, ~> ^~ Z 39$ fj[Y COUO<11 MS PU[fe Javwry 1, 1935 Paie 4 tract Major Mikeb called + r<ceu at aaD p. v. ]De veetiu{ recowewd •t 8:47 p.v. ri eb all vevdlen of the Copvcil preuat.7 aeefaw (LL) D® IT6X. POP P 3 DRDI @IOe 10 P1 AL{LUf08l MD JOYCE PR1ZIt POP PtOJZCT LOCAtZD AT @Bl] STtAIIC LAea. Ciq Clerk Auehele[ rud title of Revalutiov Mo. @7-06, _...,....^10F Zi-v6 A ItBW.PfI011 OP Se6 CI'[f CODXC]L OP Rah CIST OP tMCRO COCAMORCA, OALIPONIA, APPRMIeC A SDiODJIIRAfIOM AGttD®1T F90M ALPJWDe{ MD JOPC6 PRAT III MD AOI50RSZtMG Ie6 MATOI MD GITT CLERK TO 92CM IEE SAld X021011: Mores bT bbl, aefvvded Dy Riv{ to adopc Reavluciov ao. 85-06 apprwiv{ 9ubordiwtiw A{reseac ricb the Pr¢iv'a, vvd raive full cevdivi of the toolutioo. Motiw carried uvmivp:a ly 5-0. •ae++• (l7) 68, t8POt1' W Tea 8ttttt IpteSIPICATIOe 9IG11 PtOCRN1. Itef rryuevted by Cowril at the Decevbrr 5. 19x1 rroftiv{. Staff report by oolh[t Sirro, 4 datavt to City Neu{er. Cowcilvv 6ugwt eapr~rud tbvi the propoud fitev would uke goad •owevi n. So boe [he eoemoiq we added would require mcb pall let[en ebat it vwld be di Ef iculc to reed. Jnrt to bne the uue[ cave Ivry mw{h vitb cowivtevcy throu{DOUt cbe City rduld b cbe heu •pep iv the ci{ht dire<tiov. Maydr Mi4L felt tee block vuvMn sere sort ivporuot vod should M coy to reed. Cowailvauo Mritht eryceued ebvt abw far .n.. _ ;,.-, :. _., _... uwm IgTIgI: Moved by Yrd{hq vecovded bT Dahl [o approve cbe •igva, Due to evbrge the covmaiq idevciq a lvr{e a powiDl e. Noti ov carried bq fee Evllwiv{ voce: AT69: vrith t, Nike ta, Dabl ROES: Huquet, 81v8 M9lJIT: ewe •e•ae• (16) b0. tEP~R1 011 9A~IIIC D68IGTATIOta, Its requevt<d by Council •t the Dernber 5, 19M veeti v{. 9tvft report DT tick Goles, Ciq PLVwc. Cow<ilvuv Dfhl evpcoud thvt he had covicerw •ith chf orenll devaiq aevi{ovci wv is the hither avvi ty vrua; [o[ euvple the 14-21 wad the 24-)0. ee [elc ebeu aeedvd co M ti{huwd up, vvd • nDOrt vhwld W brw{ht forth to diavuu [biv •[ avnrn.r !im=. Sc i:ab 'vvd covurva vbmy the ACZI011: AE ter [u[[her dluuuiw, Cew<il covenrrfd eo reAr thi• WeY to vCVff vvd the Plavviv{ Cwviuiov [or • hettar de[ipi tiw of !fetter Plev vod df0alq ditlaCe titll, e f f a f (17) bD. Rnatx a cylpAict rltuc~Cp~.tD cpeTwu ~lCITT atcxlat a P{oPOain tT let ADVIaoaY ca{11u1a. 399 March 16, 1988 RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIP.' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OFFICIALLY RECOGNIZING THE HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TRI-COMMUNITIES HERITAGE ANO SUPPORTING THE PERMANENT INCORPORATION OF THE HISTORIC LEGACIES OF THE COIR4UNITIES OF ALTA LOMA, CUCAMONGA, AND ETIWANDA WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which is rapidly developing a unique high quality city image, was created from the three communitie< os eira ~Gna, wce,aunga, and Etiwanda; and - - ~~~ ` WHEREAS, each of these communities has its own history and rich cultural heritage that have contributed to the unique high quality image which is attracting national recognition of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the legacy of these communities provide Rancho Cucamonga with a rich sense of history and an important legacy for its future which will be recognized forever; and, WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan acknowledges the importance of the three communities in its statement that the Ctty should be designed to establish the identity of the City as a single entity while also preserving the individual character of the three existing communities"; and, WHEREAS, the most noteworthy attributes of each community may be identified as follows: ALTq LOMA: This community on y-i rated from twa separate agricultural colonies (Iowa and Hermosa Tracts). After railroad service was established, an election was held to select the current name by a one vnrn marnin TMo ,. has Deen known for its fertile soil, pleasant ciimate,~ beautiful setting adjacent to and below Cucamonga Peak, and distinct rural atmosphere, CUCAMONGA; This community carries the original name derived from the Spanish land grant and identified as the Rancho de Cucamonga. The original Rancho was established almost 150 years ago on March 3, 1839 and contained not only the three communities comprising the City today, but also parts of Upland and Ontario. Cucamonga has been the crossroads of this region from the days of the Indians through today acting as a convenient resting place between the desert and Los Angeles on a route for the military, settlers, mall, and the original Interstate Route 66. ETiwANOA: The community was founded by the Chaffey Brothers as an agricultural subdivision which included for the first time the allocation of water right shares on an acreage ownership basis, thereby establishing the foundation fora successful grape and wine producing industry. Other firsts for this area Trcluded installation of the first electrical lights west of the Rocky Mountains and the first long distance phone call 1n the world. 4~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. TRI-COMMUNITIES HERITAGE Page 2 NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THE FOLLONING: That the communities of Alta Lana, Cucamonga and Etiwanda have strong historical significance and the City, therefore, recognizes their unique histories, as well as their importance to the legacy of Rancho Cucamonga; and Reaffirms tts strong commitment for the incorporation and preservation of meaningful historic community elements, both physical and symbolic, in the future of Rancho Cucamonga by supporting the following concepts as well as others: 1. Retention of historic postal boundaries. 2. Neighborhood sign identification and aronumentation. 3. City commitment to design elements that further protect and promote the individual communities. 401 April 20, 1988 RESOLUTION NO. ~~~~pP A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OFFICIALLY RECOGNIZING THE HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TRI-COMMUNITIES HERITAGE AND SUPPORTING THE PERMANENT INCORPORATION OF THE HISTORIC LEGACIES OF THE COMMUNITIES OF ALTA LOMA, CUCAMONGA, AND ETIWANDA WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which is rapidly developing a unique nigh quality city image, was creaied from the Three communities of Ai to Loma, Cucamonga, and Etiwanda; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan acknowledges the importance of the three communities ir. its statement that the City should be designed "to establish the identity of the City as a single entity while also preserving the individual character of the three existing communities"; and, WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that each of these communities has its own history and rich cultural heritage that have contributed to the unique high quality image whirh is attracting national recognition; and WHEREAS, the legacy of these communities provide the City of Rancho Cucamonga with a rich sense of history and an important legacy for its future which will be recognized forever; and, WHEREAS, the most noteworthy attributes of each community may be identified as follows: ALTA LOMA: This community originated from two separate agricultural colonies (Iowa and Hermosa Tracts). After railroad service was established, an election was held to select the current name by a one vote margin. The area has been known for its fertile soil, pleasant climate, beautiful setting ad±acent to and below Cucamonga Peak, and distinct rural atmosphere. CUCAMONGA: This community carries the original name derived from the Spanish land grant and identified as the Rancho de Cucamonga. The original Rancho was established almost 150 years ago on March 3, 1839 and contained not only the three communities comprising the City today, but also parts of Upland and Ontario. Cucamonga has been the r rnc<rnaAs of thic ro_ai n_n from tha days of the indi ans through today acting as a convenient resting place between the desert and Los Angeles on a route for the military, settlers, mall, and the original Interstate Route 66. 4~~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. TRI-COIMUNITIES HERITAGE Page 2 ETINANDA: The community was founded by the Chaffey Brothers as an agricultural subdivision which Included for the first time the allocation of water right shares on an acreage ownership basis, thereby establishing the foundation for a successful grape and wine producing industry. Other firsts for this area included installatiarl of the fir electrical lights zest cf the Rocky Mountains and the first long distance phone call in the world. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THE FOLLONING: That the communities of Alta Loma, Cucamonga and Etiwanda have strong historical significance and the City, therefore, recognizes their unique histories, as well as their importance to the legacy of Rancho Cucamonga; and Reaffirms its strong commitment for the incorporation and preservation of meaningful historic community elements, both physical and symbolic, in the future of Rancho Cucamonga by supporting the following concepts as well as others: 1. Defining the historic community boundaries as those postal boundaries in effect at the time of the incorporation in November, 1977. ~. neighuornocxi siyn Taco Li~ica Li un anu nNIIUiXCl14G LI V11. 3, City commitment to desT9n elements that further protect and promote the individual communities. e.g. rock curbs in Etiwanda, equestrian trails in Alta Loma, historic wineries in Cucamonga and others. q-03 ~Bnxr~ of ~-ernisnrB (IIauntg of Sttn ~ernar~inn ~~~\1111~/~t I8'? April 6, 1988 BARBARA CRAM RIORDAN SUPERVISDR THIRD DISTP.IGT SYLVIA RORLES Fre.o nEVxESEUrnnvE MARIE TEETERS F~E,o xEw,ESSxrnnvE EO O'NEAL F@l9 PFPPESEYTRTIVE The Honorable Dennis L. Stout Mayor, City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho camonga,CA91730 Dear~~ You have no doubt seen recent news accounts of several tragic incidents in which youths, carrying toy pistols, were killed or injured by police officers who mistook the toys for the real thing. On April 4, 1988, the San 6ernardino County Board of Supervisors took a giant step forward in attempting to prevent future tragedies of this kind 6y passing an ordinance banning the sale of replira firearms in the unincorporated areas of the county. The Board of Supervisors would like to see each of the cities in San 6ernardino County follow suit by adopting an ordinance of its own to prohibit the display- for-sale and sale of replica firearms. In turn, the State will hopefully adopt a law in the near future which would ban the toy gunsthroughout California. If we Ean be of assistance to your Eity in adopting an ordinance to meet this objective, please do not hesitate to call on me. Thank you foryourcooperation. Si rely BA A RC AMRfORDAH +UAf rl'iSCr, Third DIS tr,.. Attachment (Ordinance) cc: Members of the Board of Supervisors 404 San &moEino Cavmy Gov~mment Cmeer • 986 North Armw~eeE Avenue Sen BermrEino. CA 920150110 17141 38A4R55 • 17141826~IOS0 ORDINANCE NO. 3229 I 3 AN ORDINANCE OF iR~lE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, 6TATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 11 TO DIVISION 7 OF 4 TITLE 2 OF THE SAN BE RNARDZNO COUNTY CODE, 5 RELATING TO A PROHIBITION OF DISPLAY FOR SALE AND SALE OF REPLICA FIREARMS, AND PENALTY FOR 6 VIOLATION THEREOF 7 $ The Board of Supezvieora of the County of San Bernar- 9 dino, State of California, ordains as follows: !0 11 SECTION 1. Chapter 11 is added to Division 7 of Title 2 1, of the San Bernardino County Code to read as follows: 13 14 IS ~e 16 CHAPTER 11 17 Replica Firearas ~;: So s~ 18 ~`°g~ 19 3ectione: ~~~z 20 L/.111 Repiicu naLeaLwe - viPyi aY iw :,n.c og~ and Sale Pzoh iblted 21 27.112 Penalty for Violation sN 23 24 47.111 Replica Firearms - Display for Sale a~ Sale Prohibited '_5 26 (a) No person shall display for Bale or Bell a replica 27 or faceinile of a firearn within the unincorporated area of the 28 County. 29 (b) Aa used in this chapter, the meaning of the term 30 rireer m" ahaii `u6 the acme as the maa....y^ ,.. 31 "Dangerous Weapons' Control Law" located at Section"12000 et seq 32 Iof the Penal Code of the State of California. A "replica or fac- 33 simile of a firearm" shall include any device or object made of 3A plastic, wood, metal or nny other material, which can reasonably 35 be perceived to be an actual firearn, but is not an actual fire- 36 arm. 6uch tern 8oee not include any non-firing replies of an SAH:md 03/29/88 ORDreplics L~.~s s ~,sr ~:- noW .~~g rg c2 fig ~.'za u~X I 3 4 5 EI, 7 B 9 10 I1 I? 13 14 IS 16 17 I8 19 20 ~I ,~ 24 25 26 27 28 79 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 antique fireerm, the original of which was designed, manufactured end produced prior to 1898. 27.112 Penalty for Violation Any person, crorporation, firm or association of persons who vi elates the provisions of ihie chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, punishatle in accordance with the provisions of § 11.021 of this Code. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days from the date of adoption. /%~~~~ JOHN JOYF 2, a iman Board of Supervisors SIGNED AND CERTIFIED THAT A COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DELIVERED TO THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD MARTHA M. SCUDDER, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors TATS OF CALIFORNIA ) es. COUNTX OF SAN BE RNA RDINO ) I, MARTHA M. SCUDDER, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Be rnazdino, State of California, hereby cer- tify that at a regular meeting of the Beard of Supervisors of Bair County and State. held on the 4th day of APr11.^ r.. _.~ 1988, at which meeting Mare preaeni auyecvi ni,r s: uori v. mikeis, an t e er , t e orego ng or finance was pae• en a op~Tte~T~Y the following vote, to wit: AYESa SUPERVISORSa Mikels, Riordan, Welker, Hammock, NOESa SUPERVISORSa None -2- ~~ 3 4 5 R 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 IS y 16 ~~~ 17 e~'" 18 ~"4 19 a~~k 20 RM 21 2'_ 23 24 25 26 27 28 ~o 30 31 32 33 34 3S 36 ABSENT: SUPERVIBORSz pone IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set ny hand and nffixed the official seal of the Board of Supervisors this 4th day of April , 1988. MARTHA M. SCUDDER, Clerk of the Soerd of Supervlsors of the County of San Bernardino, ~~F~ State of Ce iifornia I::r 9 Y las { putt' 3 ~ 1 FBiAL STATRMENT OF COMMUNITY OBdRCTIVESS POR THE 1988-89 COMMUNITY DSVSLOPMENT BLOCH GRANT PROGRAM Prepared for: City o[ Rancho Cucamonga 9329 Race ~.:~~ o:~'! Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 (719)989-1801 Prepnred by: Michael Drandman Associates, Inc. 411 West 5th Streee, Suite 1010 Los Angeles, California 90013 (313) Gii-4443 AprD 1988 TABLB OF CONTENTS Section ~ L INTRODUCTION AND RESOLUTION ..............................1 II. PONSUAROP ......................... .................... ......3 EI. STANDARD PORM 424 ..........................................5 _ [Y. SUMMARY OP CnnG O!iJECfl9ES ................................8 - p. Summary of Community Developm ent and Housing Needs ........10 ft. Comprehensive Strategy/Statement oP Community Objectives.. ,'21 C. Three-Year Project Summary .............................. V. RBLOCATION AS344TANCB POWCY .............................22 VL COMMUNITY DRVBLOPMBNT PROGRAM ........................24 VII. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION ......................................27 - VL HOUSING ASSL4TANC8 PLAN AND HOUSING ACTION PROGRAM. , , 29 - I7C. CBRTQ~[CATIONS ....................................... ......... JOE/OL&0004 ~ SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION The City of Rancho Cucamonga has participated in the Cederally funded Community Block Grant program since its incorporation-first as a part oC the Urban County -- program administered by San Dernardino County and, since 1982, as an entitlement city. Since 1962, the city has received $2,553,000.00 in Community Block Grant -- funds, whlel~ have been used for a variety of projects ldescribed in Section BI}-aB - aimed at meeting the federal objective of: "Development of viable urban communities by providing decent housing and a suitable living environment and expanding ecronomic opportunities, principally for persons of low- and moderate-income." In the past, the city has pursued this strategy by: L Focusing efforU on the pockets of older development within the larger, rapidly growing city. 2. Enrnuraging the upgrading of existing housing stocY, through low-interest loans [o low- and moderate-income homeowners end emergency repair grants to senior citizens and handicapped households. ~~ ~~rrJ ~l~.6 1^u~ieyuaie une suostandard public [ecilities in identified target areas (streets, storm drains and recreation facilities). Five target areas have been identified: 1, North Town -cant. 2. North Town -west. 3. Old e11te Loma 4, Southwest Cucamonga 5, Etiwwtda Section 1V oC this report further describes these areas. The housing rehabilitation program has been operating in all of these neighborhoods Md citywide, but the focus of public improvement activity was the North Town neighborhood up until the 1987-88 fiscal year. In 1987-88, the city shifted the focus of its efforts to the JOB/018-0009 t Southwest Cucamonga neighborhood because the major public improvements have _ been compieted in North Town. In soliciting ideas Cor projects to receive Com mwiity Development Block Grnnt - (CDBG) funding during the 1909-89 program year, letters were sent to ail community groups and agencies which had previously submitted suggestions, as well as to city department heads and er, advertisement wes put in the local paper (see Section VUD. 'Pha ;x'oject suOe^Sl1L`f`w^ ai::.^,li vicfc received are described m Section VI. Notice of the public hearing on the Preliminary Statement of Community Objectives was also published in the Daily Report on iNarch 4, 1988. JOR/018-0004 2 RESOLUTION N0. RS-159 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OE THE CITY OP RANCHO CU CAFUNGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF' COMMUNITY OBJECTNES POft THE FISCAL YEAR 198tl-1989 AND PRELIMINARY SELBCPION OF PROJECTS BASED ON AN ANTI CE PAYED GRANT OF $417,000 WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is an Enti Cl amen[ City under the regulati ane governing the Community Development Block Grant Program; end WHEREAS, notice of availabil i[y of funds for eligible projects wee published in The Daily ReperT, poet ed in the target area, 9s well es public places City-wide end mailed to interested groups; end WHEREAS, the City staff hea received propoenla for proj ecte and programs faom va ri oue organic eti one in the community; end WHEREAS, the City Council has held a legally noticed public hearing in order to give the public en opportunity to respond to staff recommends ti one for program funding end [o put forth for Council consideration recommendations of their wn; end WHEREAS, the City Council has hee rd public testimony end received all public input rage rding the City's Community Development Hlock Crenf Pro¢tem for [he neEl pro¢r em veer. NOW, TN ERE FO RE, BE IT RESOLVED that Che City Council of the City of Re ncho Cucemange does hereby take the following actions: 1. De [etmin¢ that ope reti on of the Housing Rehabilitation program in the flood plain ie the moat practical end deai rable of the el ternetivea, end the proposed mitige ti on mace urea ape sufficient. 2. Determine that improvements for street in Southwest Cucamonga which ere in the flood pl sin, ere the moat erect teal end de ei table of the el ternativee, and that proposed mitigeti on meaeurea ere sufficient. Lf ralnca:i c-, - l.ouaehni.de or ^_ncinasaa- is necessary ae the resulc of they Community Development Block Grant Program, the adopted relocation policy in compl fence vith etete end federal regul a[i one vill be falloaed. Resolution No. RB-159 Page 2 4. Preliminary eel ecti on of the follwing proj acre end programs to be funded ou[ of the City's 1988-89 Comauni cy Development Block Orent flvard which is an iici pared to be $417,000. The balance Vill be reprogrammed from unexpended prior year funds. a. Senior Shared Housing $ 6,300.00 b. 5W Cucamonga Si rest Imprwementa 369,000.00 c. Program Administration ~~ ~43.D0 Fair Housing 8,657.00 $458,700,00 PASSED. APPROVED, end ADOPTED this 16th day of March, 1988. AYES: Bzovn, Huq ue t, Stout, Wright, Ring NOES: None ABSENT: None ~~ Dennis L. Stovt. Meyot ATTEST: 1 i _ i /.. Beverly ~[-----~ ~Authel et, City Qerk I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERIC of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the Foregoing Resolution vas duly passed, approved. end adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 16th day of March, 1988. Executes rhiu i7rh riay of Ms rch, '988 s. ..a.,.,.,. Cvicemonge, Caiitornifl. ,. ~ I 7 ..,~' I t"• , ~i 1. ~, Beverly Ar Authelet, City Clerk Fmm .A~pnprerad OMe No. 1506.UDa1 U.S. DEr^ARI MENT Of IIpU51NG ANU IINpAN DEVELOPMENT LOMMUNI i'/ UE V E LOPMEN I ULOCK GN/1NT PRUGMM REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS AND CERTIFICATION 1Pursuam fn .Section 704 //rl o/ fiUe / oI r/re Housing and Communi(y Developnrenl Act of 1974 as Amenrfedl ENVIRONMENTAL 1. NnMk n[ nrr LICANT City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ B-88-MC-06-0556 a. ~ nrr Llcnrar's nopncss b~~/w+. sn«r. G'rv. SMn.,m 9320 "B" Base Line Road .;ant ho C,.,.a~~~ nga, Califalnie 91730 5. REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS. Release of alapmved gram lurMs for the lolbwing project is reVUesled: PROJECT GRANTEE (//Oiher than ApP/iranlrl Southwest Cucamonga Street Improvements In which the Public Works Department will reconstruct Avenida Vejar, Pl acids Court, and Sierra Madl-e Avenue north of Arrow Route, instal- ling curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street lamps and, where necessary, upgrading sewer and water lines. The total amount of funding allo- cated to the project is $369,000 of which $327,300 are from the 1988-89 program year. fi. CERTIFICATION. With leler¢nee to Ure alrove prpjecl,l.thr. Rndarsigned ortic¢r of she applicant, cerlily: Thal the applicant hm al I¢ul raven hl days Irtior to sulanitling This rnqunt Ira Ieleas¢ of lands and cerlificalinn, published and diY scnanatnd In thr manner prrtscrilmd LY P4 C.PR SR.IG Ibl. a notice to shP nubnr !~ n~.w ..! w/yin :~ er.,ec/red! b: ame¢!ence wi!!e ?! 1.~ n "vR,.TR iai. Thal the apphrant has lolly carried out its respnnsi6ililiestor ¢nvironment¢I review, decision.makirg and anion IrerUinirp to the pro jPCI earned alrove; Thal the appliranl has uamplieJ with the National Environmental Puliry Act nl Ig69; That the applicant has com~ plied with the ¢nvironmrntnl prneeJw¢s, permit r¢cplirem¢nls and Ih¢ statutory nbl igelinm nl the laws cilasl in T1 CFR 58.51a1111: and Thal Ihn applicant has taken inln arnmun the envir nnmmdal criteria, standards, Irennil rerpliremmRS and nllrer oblyatiom appli~ ~ able lu Ihr W mm~l Imder the other related laws and authorities cilnl;n Z4 CFR 50.1 lal (71: That Ih¢ Icvrl of nnvirommental clearance ranieJ ovt by applicant in connection wish Ihis said project ^ did It~C did not repVira aM prepal anon and diss¢minatiaa nl an envirnnmenlal imliacl nal¢ment; IMII That sl>c dates upon which all statutory amt regulstory time periods for review, comment, or otiser response or xtian in regard to this deararsce tsegan and ended as irdioted below; that ail wch dates vvhids xe applioNe to ibis aloresaid clearance are indicated blow: grid that with the a%piration of each of the time phials irdicated below, applicant is in compliance with the requirements of Zd CFR Part 5g; COMMENCE E%IIflE ITEM MO/pAV/VR MO/DAY/VR Notice of Finding of No Significant Impxt Publication Same: Comment period Notice of Intent to Prepare EIS Publication Drak EIS: Comment period Same: 94day Aerial fNEPA Regulstiafrs) Final EIS: 3Pday period (NEPA Regulations( 7-DaV Notice of Intent to Request Release of - ---~ ~--- Funds: Publication 15day HUD decision period Other (Speci/y) That 1 am authorised lo, and tlo, conum to assume the status of responsible /ederal official under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1968 arai each provision of law spetif ied in T4 CFR 5R.1 (a1 (3) insolx at the provisions of theca lawt apWY to the NUD responsibi~ !ities !cr environmental review, decisiomnak irg and action assumed aml cxried out by the applicant; that by so consenting, I aswme the retponsibiliti<s, where applicable, for the conduct of environmental review, decisionmaairsg arsd xtion as so environmenal itwes, Art partition and circWation of dra4, linal and wpplemental environmental impxt statements, and assumption of lead ayency or maperatisg agency responsibilities for preparation of such statements on behalf of Federal agerreiet including HUD, when these agencies content to wch assumpton; Thal I am amhorised to consem to, and do, accept on behalf ..f she applicant and personally, the lurisdidion of the Federal coups for the enforcement of all these respomibilities, in my official capacity as certifyug officer of the applicant. /.G'arsefure Tif/e end ddrbes o/ sbrt%/vine O/llcer o/ Applicant WARNING -- a.niwr 1001 0l TiM 10 al rM UnIM Surr Coda and CriminN Iroadaa JrNI qpp re rhk rani/k+lion. TstM t0 Wmldes. amwy MMr ::i:-~.::::._.__..__ ..__..:__... Y. _::u..:.. _.:._ ....~ _ a._....Y... ... _.n:..-..... ~ ~ .. ~... Lam. Iksisiwn. w InWulms saammr w m4L fn ~y merrw within rM Iwisdkrion el :nY dapwlmant a ganeY of rM Unrtad SYta, abNl b IIr:N nw mwa Ilan 110,000 w Mgrirw,M nor mwa Mrr Ike Vern w eoM. E=[OcRAL ASSISTANCE 1 npE ~ ^ uV rv.,E Cl IHrErrt EY"IDNAU s~Eln~~sv..r b:. ~• 1~. ApEt r..FExY. :..>u. vwnEo _-.T J IniE a wve..~.~ „ ,rV N9Ea . EaH: ~ ~bFl. c•*AY1 I r r•. N/A IDE rnI. N/A ec Hn. ._..__ j ErEn _____ - IIEa a DniE v R ~~ a le, `• ; +.a.n A55rcNFD Yom. -. . A., .... u... ~,• At.+a^~w... ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ~~:rvry•N-. u~: Planning Division I< :~.•orD 60. P.O. Box 807 'a ~n Rancho Cucamonga •c 1, San Bernardino r iul. raliinrnia :r r„n. Olv3v n c..,... p:.•en lW.... Larry Henderson (714) 989-1861 A TrAr l-.. M1'nr 4 ] ililF CF AfY ~rJHI-5 fi1QrEC1 Illw •c>n rv y V~ k.m b y-mb , nm, r, y.pq M C., l 1-~^'~I 1. Fair Housing Services ~I 2. Housi ny Planning and Historic Prese rvatiorl ~; 3. Senior Shared Housing 4. Southwest Cucamonga Streets Phase I c naG Ci hiNfC~ iur,~'1 r+'.~+e/r^a ra'+n o•r., •v/ o ES*luniEO uuuef.n U< rEV Spas BF UErInrHl A~' City of Rancho Cucamonga 80,420 ._.--_ ___~ ~L_ ____ PnCY`]SED/vNpNG O (4+GP[SSKYUI CISin2TSp L •[:.~`E I, 4_17_,000_ m • ~i~oilcJ7,'. _._ e pncuECi -.__ i[ s_•lE_ m a va(1:ECi 5rAgi :6 pPN((1 -ro L., +rA Fn ' - - -_I_------ a 88 7 1 12 y„en I, plrrta __ _ rol_ __ _~,__..__. _ ____ _.__ I. ._... ~ ---A n nnn ,., fEERnx A,E NCr ~ n AA F r• aQl HWBEn IE IHI c • Huu6EP I1~~2~ 1 ~8~ nAU IFs+ CFUAI I yi n nm a !'1 fI TE*~ Community Development -l _ Block Grant . ti OE MroEXN(t/`p~(prtM _ ~~ .-~ ~ r-a" %in, .._ a.. ,../... _ ~ ~ .. r.PE c•' AncEr_~noH :~. r ~.. ' ..~_~. U - rl..r Wr Iv F[JE=n ACE <. io nfcElr. nE~uu, pe t. of Ilo_usin & Urban Develo ment "Ei~c'hau ~. ~`uuoEUl ......---. ....---- -~ -~ -~---p-~- - --9-----~- -.._. P......__. ._-~ . L. iv:: i• C:fr.HiLn iYYUl lnel lir nrtnb„mn:niF.l ~4 nWlrn5i11aWE UOrI Afi pf C,rawHl ' Los Angeles Area Office _ _ I Fred Stillions ~, 8-88-MC-Ofi-0556 ~I. •E. flEss In nEUAn.s •PDED . 1fi15 `nest Olympic 8ouleva rd Los Anyel es, CA 90015 ------- ~i. erg.;,-r.;::.,rr.=r~=-€s ~-.rs;1- - - •(-I--°E--~-"'- '< ~• T u vr, n tt/~nm/ I• _ if w'C~n ionC ~rpUCirx'+u~i.ocl iil,q wiS U~JE •vni4dtE lO iwE SIAIE ..~ y • •tO.:•s-n fAF ~ImYE pN:n rn'] vP J:E6s F.. of nFN (w r.l w f+vw .ur W . __________ __ _. ..,n u.IES M^e m./-.:H ty n. Y~i^•N __ Mfi o ••MU •b vw •nr .:I taro} -•m rv ,N:r`~l •ut.•~ • • ••N•urc• n u+v r..al 1' )± • lYt/D IIAYE NrD LIiLE i cr r, m.wu ~r _I4fg4 n'+E _ ~ __.. _ , . _ _. __ I nr tr Y=D ,v 1 1- nroD ~ ' •I •NE H(,.If Vf I APpl Ulll ~ ':I Cn nfrtuH(D Fpn '1 ? E O 4>r; SufluCSllyl °_si A_( __ _ + 6v •prIICAHI lD J E(GAF F St AtC p • (%•E nn ED ODI(n C 1 w11nDnA WH 1 tUtAL t qw lYnn~4M-Ai11 r:p rqp ~nAU 4 RF CAKnFO H. F J GO'] I.1 rp paDGnAU rp5 wli 6[fH i[ES.ClE9 L/9All'n(yr PCAfW ~~ ~O 61GHA NnE 1HUIHEI ~ ~~ Im mrA~bl ~ Ir•r rnr, Si.Pirr1G _ __ ___ E~:p Ar:IC OgFn IV __ D•iE IE vu 1 _ _ W 11 QY:IACi ip+ nMllRy:nl IuP)r1uA. l1 M ~P Vv 1 14yr 1An+. •J UOµ.+. u~.F•I EN(NN4 On DAiE n _, ~.~ ll nEUAnrs ADDED vM O Ib IHwnh~ 1.041 Crmb. Is rKn uveE[ sacTlox rv SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY DEV$LOPMENT OBJECTrvES 'Che City Counc0 has identified the major community development or low- and moderate-income housing need of the city as the need to upgrade and maintain the - pockets of older development in the rapidly growing city, As well as older housing stock, thse areas have older public improvements which are frequently inadequate for Rn wtmn area, or in need of repair. Five target areas have been identified (see - Exhihit 1): 1, North Town -east 2. North Town -west 3. Southwest Cucamonga 4. Old alts Loma 5. Etiwenda These are small areas-much less then a census tract. Because of the mix of older end newer development in each census tract, only two oC these five areas (North Town east and west) were reported in the 1980 Census as having over 51 percent of the households earning less than 80 percent of the regional median household income and, therefore, qualifying as low- or moderate income neighborhoods. As a result, although aB of the areas were targeted for housing renaou¢anon toss ens gran[ assistance, only North Town qualified for and received assistance in the Corm of upgraded public improvements (streets, sidewalks, perks, street lights and storm drains). In 1985, the city commissioned a survey of households in Old Alta Loma and Southwest Cucamonga to determine whether any portion of these areas could be slwwn to be over 51 percent low- and moderate-income households. Only o portion of one street in Oid Alta fume clearly qualified, but several streets in Southwest Cucnmonga did (see Exhibit 2). City policy regarding the use oC CDBC program funds is to designate at least 80 percent oC the entitlement funds each year [or programs which directly benefit low- and moderate-income households in the city. JOB/018-0004 8 - Norm TowrWe.t 'L -North TowrE.N $ - 8aulhweet Coe.monp. 4 - OM Atl. Lonr 5 - Feotnuveuw.~w. ytt. ~.. NO SCALE City of Rancho Cucamonga Rehabilitation Target Areas MYtiIe~~MtiWw N.A~ 1 Nor1A Town-West 2 NortA Town-Feel ,~ BoulAwest Cucemonpe Q Olo Alte Loms $ FoolAlll/Etlwenes ~~~00 Gnew Trecle ~~~Q BIOCk BtOeee HO SCALE City of Rancho Cucamonga Census Tracts, Block Groups and Rehabilitation Target Areas .~e.~,,...,. e.., Since the public improvements identi[ed as needed in North Town have been largely completed, the City Council directed that the focus o[ the CDBG program shift to the Southwest Cucamonga target neighborhood. Priority Cor completing the improvements was established as moving north to south. In 1987-88, improvements to Via Carrillo were funded. JOB/018-0004 9 A. SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING NEED A profile of the city describing population characteristics (based on updated 1980 census date and State Department of Finance data) is shown in Table 1. The selected target areas Cor housing and infrastructure rehabilitation ere aE smaller then the area of a census tract. Table 2 shows a description of population charaeterisiiics at the block group level for the selected target areas. Data at the block group level were also obtained from the i5aG Gensus. TABLET POPULATION CHARACTERLSTiCS Number Percent L Total Populations 80,420 100.0 1. Sex Male 40,290 50.1 Female 40,130 49.9 2. Race/Ethnicity White 70,689 87.9 Hispanic 13,106 18.3 Black 1,769 2.2 Other 2,975 3.7 II. Total Households 2S,'L'!U iuu.u 1. Total Lower-Oicome Householdsb 4,953 19.6 OI. Total Pemilies 19,620 100,00 1. Lower income Families 3,327 10.5 W hi tc 2, 531 12.9 Hispnnic 628 3.2 Black 20 0.1 Other 78 0.4 2. Income Below Poverty Level 903 4.6 n Source: State Department of Finance Population Research Unit as of Jmuery 1, 1987. Other data in this table were updated using the same proportion as the I oap ..>„ins, b Lower Income is defined as those [amuites/nousenoids earning ices rnan 80 percent oC the county median income. JOB/018-0004 10 TABLE 2 TOTAL LOW/MODHRATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS BY CENSUS TRACT AND BLOCK GROUP 1980 CENSUS Census Block Total Total Low/ b Percent Low; Tract Groupu k(ouseholds Moderate-Inemne Moderate-Incrome 8.02 1 495 83 16.8 8.U2 G h86 i5i 22.0 13.00 1 340 58 17.1 20.00 1 673 71 10.5 20.00 2 3,396 518 15.3 20.00 3 2,430 523 21.5 20.00 4 3,643 333 9.1 20.00 6 39 3 7.7 20.00 9 1,691 200 11.8 21.90 1 769 233 30.5 21.00 2 1,150 299 26.0 21.00 3 1,279 639 50.0 21.00 4 248 128 51.8 22.00 3 144 fil 42.4 a Low/moderate-income household: are defined es those with en income less than 80 nercent of the 1980 median incorne for San Bernardino County. b Household income information was suppressed for block groups not listed here. 'Cerget areas are shown superimposed over the block group areas in Exhibit 3. N previous years, the North Town target area hos been the focus of block grant funded community service and public improvement programs, such as street reconstruo- tion. The Southwest Cucamonga target area has also been certified by HUD es eligible for public improvements. This even will be the Cocus of community service and public improvement projects over the next two program years. Intormetion on the rnndition of the Iwusing stock is provided in the Housing Assistance Plan (Section VI o[ this report). JOB/018-8804 11 L HOUSING There is a need to continue city efforts to improve existing housing stock that does not meet building or safety erode requirements yet is basicnlly sound and esn, with some improve inert efforts, continue to serve the housing needs oC the city. Substandard units ere not concentrated in one area but are scattered in small neighborhoods tlu•oughout the city. There is also a need to continue city efforts to eliminate discriininatien in the sale end rental of housing end to ensure that the rights of all parties are protected. 'the 3-year housing assistance plan and the 1-year housing action program (troth attached) identity in tabWar and narrative Corm the housing needs o[ the city. There are a total of 660 substandard units within the city (out of a total housing inventory oC 22,664 units), of which 544 are suitable for rehabilitation. The total of minority households in substandard housing is 136; minority househohds requiring rental subsidies total 295. A substantial number of households headed by handicapped persons or single individuals with dependent children are also in the city. The city's housing ele~n ant of the general plan notes that the city's housing stock is generally sound (due to the relatively recent build-out of much oC the city); however, the substandard and deteriorating units in the older parts of the city will require immediate attention. The housing element further identities the expansion of the supply oC lower prised housing units as a critical housing issue in Ux: city (to accommodate the recent and projected growth) in addition to the problem of substandard units. State law requires the city to update the housing element of the general plan every 5 years. There is a need to coordinate the long-range planning of housing programs to comply with state law with the federally funded CDBG program. There is also a need to identity the city's historic resources and enure that CUBG programs end iNOjects (such as housing rehabilitation) Nrther historic preservation goals. 2. NRIGHOORHOOD R1iYITALIZATION There is a need for certain public improvements in older neighborhoods whleh have been targeted for rehabilitation assistance to prevent the spread o[ blight end JOB/018-0004 12 deterioration, to eliminate the causes of blight, and to support the investment of public and private fwids in rehabilitation. Specific areas of improvement include: o North Town street improvements, including reconstruction of the rosdway and construction of curbs, gutters, sidewalks and driveway aprons on the substandard streets. a Southwest Cucamonga street improvements, including reconstruction of the street and construction o[ curizs, gutters, sidewalks, street lights, driveway aprons on the substandnrd streets, installation of sanitary sewers where none exist and upgrade of water end sewer lines to bring them up to current health and safety standards. o Community services (parks and recreation programs end facilities) to encourage united neighborhood notion to improve the areas, combat vandalism end truancy and provide activities for residents and their families. JOf3/018-0004 13 B. COMPRHHHNSIVH STRATHGY (STATHMENP OF COMMUNITY OBJHCTIVPS) Based on past direction from City Cowcil and the analysis of community needs involved in the preparation of the commwity development plan, the following comprehensive strategy (including statement of community objectives) was prepared. Programs proposed to achieve these objectives are listed wder each objective. A detailed description of each project is contained in the attached project description sheets (see Section VI, Commwity Development Program). City policy regarding the CDBG program is to designate at least 66 percent of the entitlement Cwds each year for programs which directly benefit persons of low- end moderate- ineome. 1. HOUSING MAINTENANCE AND RHHABII.ITATION (HRI31'ING PROGRAM) Needs Assessment PIMinR There is a need to continue city efforts to improve existing housing stock that does not meet building or safety code requirements yet is basically sound and can, with some improvement effex~ts, continue to serve the housing needs of the city. Substandard units are not concentrated in one area but are scattered in smell neighborhoods throughout the city. Ob'ec~ five To eliminate end prevent slums, blight, and conditions detrimental to health, safety rod public welfare while preserving the housing stock [or people o[ Iow- and inodcrate-income. This is in direct compliance with the national objective of eliminating slums and blight. Only tow- and moderate-income households ere eligible Cor loons or grants, which is also in accord with the federal regulatiore (Section 570.202). ems The existing housing rehabilitation program offers deferred loans end below-market interest rate bare to persons/families of low- or moderate-income and home JOB/018-0004 14 improvement grants for minor projects to senior citizens and disabled or handicapped persons througiwut the city. This program is managed by the Son Bernardino County Office of Community Development through o contract with the city. Funded activities include: o Outreach/public information. _ -- o Home improvement loans. o FIome repair grants (senior citizen, disabled, handicapped persons). Housing maintenance and rehabilitation activities reflect the goals of the housing assistance plan (FLAP). The rehabilitation goals in the HAP are met through this program. In 1982-83, ;84,000.00 of the city's block grant was allocated for this program end $20,OOO.OD was expended. N 1983-84, ;70,000.00 was allocated and ;42,000.00 was expended at the end of the year. All oP the funds from the 1963-84 program year have been expended. h~ 1984-85, $8Q,000.00 was allocated and ;44,800.00 was expended. In 1985-86, ;80,000.00 was allocated and $126,000.00 was spent. to 1986-87, $99,080.00 was spend of the $80,000.00 budget. In 1987-88, only ;7,500.00 has bean spent oP the ;106,000.00 set aside for the program. Therefore, no new funds ere being allocated in 1988-89. Instead a reprogramming of unexpended funds Crom previous years will be used to fund the progran. 2 HOUSING AND H13TOR[C PRffiRRVATION PLANNING Needs Assessment Pindirg There is a need to cooMinete the research, planning and program development in the general plan and the Historic Preservation Commission with the CDBG program to avoid conflicts sod ensure consistency. 'active To coordinate the research, planning and implementation programs for the general plan housing element revision, the Historic Preservation Commission end the CDBG orogrmn. JOB/018-0004 15 Programs During the 1988-89 fiscal year, the city wilt be revising the Iwusing element oC the general plan to reflect changing conditions since the last element was prepared and to comply with recent changes in state law. The City Council has also recently di!•ected the Historic Preservation Commission :o develop policy recommendations to ensure preaer vntio„ of the eitp's historic r,..,..,., xs. hs part o[ the administration of the 1988-09 grant, staff will participate in these planning end program development efforts. 3. PAIR ROUBRiG (BXISTR4G PROGRAM) Needs Assessment Finding There is a need to continue city efforts to eliminate discrimination in the sale end rental o[ housing sod to ereure that the rights of all parties are protected. eetive To provide information and aCtirmative support Cor the [air housing laws of the state -- and federal govermnents in support of the goal of ensuring that all residents have access to a decent home in a suitable living environment, end the requirement that the city affirmatively further fair housing (Section 5i0.601(b)). Preg(Amg Por 1988-89, two agencies submitted proposals to provide services in this area. The San Bernardino County Community Housing Resowces f)oard (CHItB) has requested - "A iirul to nrnviriw rair ixmninF PddCntiOn vru4. :viand "t Cdintien r?^ard 1`zs pegeaaterl - $8,554 to continue their contract for atoll-range of Cair housing services, including: o Outreach and public information. o l.nndlord/tenant mediation. o Counseling on fair Iwusing laws. JOH/018-0004 18 ht 1982-83, Wand iV?ediation handled 145 cases from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In 1983-84, they handled in excess of 160 cases and in 1984-BS they handled 223 cases. In fiscal year 1985-86, 168 cases were processed and in 1986-87, over 220 cases were handled. Inland Mediation expects to handle some 230 cases from Rancho Cucamongn in 1987-88. 'Che agency has two paid staff members and relies primarily on volunteers to provide vital information end counseling. The grant request is proportional 7asad on the pczeerRage o..~,a,:.s~ which sr2 i~...a..eho Cucamonga (npproximately 8 percent). The City CouneR has elected to continue the contract with Intend Mediation Hoard in 1988-89. 4. SHNIOR SHARHD HOUSING (EXIS7'BiG PROGRAM) Needs Assessment Findirg There is a need for public servlces in support of other CUBG programs, particularly those targeted at senor citlzens in the area who are lower income but may not live in a target area. These residents ere not aware of the range of housing options available to them to continue to live independently. To provide counseling and crferral services to senior citizens to assist them to mintage their homes and remain independent. The emergency repair grant program is targeted at seniors, and staff finds that these clients frequently need counseling on other housing-related issues. am Continue under contract with Inland Mediation the program that counsels seniors on +i,e~. i.nna~nn nnrinnc nnri mninnne nr,nnin wnn want in chore iirair home wiiii aeniuF ..._.. .._...,...n _~.._._ _.._ ... _. _.. __ ~__~__ .._ ... citizens in need of housing. This is the third year Cor the program and the counseling work (assisting seniors to identity and evaluate housing options) is proving to be more valuable than the actual matches. JOB/018-0004 17 5. PUBWC WORKS 1MPROVHMENTS (HRLSTINC PROGRAM) Needs Assessment Pinding There is a need for certain public improvements in predominantly low- and moderate-income neighborhoods which have been targeted Cor rehabilitation assistance to prevent and eliminate blight end deterioration. These improvements would reinforce private efforts and eliminate hazards to public health and safety. Two neighborhoods in Rancho Cucamonga have been certified by NUD as elibible for these types of improvements-North Town and Southwest Cucamonga. Most of the improvements in North Town have been completed. In 1987-B8, City Council directed staff to shift the focus of CDBG efforts to Southwest Cucamonga. Objective To eliminate hazards to the public health and safety end provide street improvements in areas targeted for housing rehabilitation assistance. Priority in these improvements is being given to areas whose residents are predorninently low- and moderate-income and to repairs which will correct health and safety hazards, thus improving the living environment. These programs will further the national coals of elitninflting slums, blight and primarily benefit low- and moderate-income households. ams The engineering depsrLnent has prepared an estimate of the cost of the necessary street iinprove!nents in Soullrwest Cura!nonga. They are: o Arrow Route (from Grove to Sierra Madre) o Ninth Street (from Grove to Baker) _ Yia f'arillo (entire) o Placida Court (entire) o Avenida Vejar (Grove to Sierra Madre) o Calaveras Avenue (Ninth to Arrow Route) o Celaveras Avenue (south of Ninth Street) o Sierra Madre Avenue (north of Arrow Aoute) 5296,000.00 350,000.06 208,000.00 56,000.00 153,000.00 270,000.00 149,000.00 132,000.00 JOB/018-0004 18 o Sierra Madre Avenue (Arrow Route to Ninth) 249,000.00 o Sierra Madre Avenue (south of Nin[h Street) 199,000.00 o Vinmer Avenue (north of Satins) 71,000.00 o Vinmac Avenue (south of Ninth) 135,000.00 o Selina Avenue (Calaveres to Sierra 17adre) 13$,000.00 o Alley south oC Ninth Street (entire) 51,000.00 Total $1,701,000.00 - Necessary improvements include pavement rehabilitation, construction of curbs, gutters, sidewalks and the installation of street lights. Some areas also need sanitary - sewers and water line upgrading. Such projects are eligible under Sections s70.201(ex8), (9) and (10). given the a#ent and cost of the needed improvements, this will be a multi-year program. The first phase of the improvements will be the streets north of Arrow Highway. That is, Phase t includes: o Vie Carillo o Avenida Vejer o Sierra Madre and Plecida Court improvements to Via Carillo were funded in 1987-88. For t9"8-89, the City will fund both the design and construction of Avenida Vejer and the design and construction of improvements to Placida Court and Sierra Madre Avenue north of Arrow Route, $327,300 will come from the 1988-89 grant and 41,700 from reprogramming unexpended prior years funds allocated to program administration. 6. COMMUNITY SBRV[C8S (N8W PROGRAM) Ncr~ Assessment PindinQ There is a need to provide recreation facilities accessible to persons and families of Iaw- and moderate-income in eligible low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The two areas which qualify in Rancho Cucamonga are North Town end Southwest Cucamonga. The acquisition and development of a perk in North Town was selected far funding in 1984-85 and 1985-86. The 4outhwest Cucamonga neighborhood also needs a park, but suitable sites are scarce. JOB/018-0004 lg rr Ta NO SCALE ~m~ Southwest Cucamonga '~ Street Improvements: Phase I AAIv16~Jr.V~uu~ MnM •aeti~e To provide neighborhood perks and recreation facilities in low- end moderate-incrome neightarhoods of Southwest Cucamonga and North Town in order to support rehabilitation of those areas and in order [o meet the needs o[ the residents. Creation of these centers Cor community activities will improve the living environment in the surrounding low- and moderate-incrome neighborhood and support the prevention and elimination of blighting conditions, as required under the national priorities. ems The Community Services Department has not requested Cunding Cor 1988-89. This project is eligible under Section 570.201(c)(1) and (2). JOB/018-0004 20 D. TIiREE-YEAR PROJECT SUMMARY based upon the comprehensive strategy outlined above, the city's 3-year program for the CUBC program is summarized in the Table 3. The fable identifies, by program objective, the projects proposed for funding for Ciscal years 1987-88, 1988-99 and 1989-90. The estimated percentage breakdown of funding by objective is based upon past city experience with the Mock grant program (from 1982-88). TABLE 3 THREE-YEAR PROGRAM SUMMARY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Estimated % -- ProgremCDBG Funding Community Development Proposed Streteg~Allocation and Housing Objectives 1988-b9 1987-90 1367-89) 1. liousing maintenance Housing rehabilitation Continuation o[Up to 25% - and rehabilitation ~ repair grant program existing program 2. Fair !lousing inland Mediation Continuation ofUp to 5% existing program 3. Community Services - Provision of Up to 70% (Southwest Cucamonga additional rai`s, ueigiiuvri.vvu au C...uL.-. center end North Town Perk) 4. Street Improvements Southwest Cucamonga Provision of Up to 70'W -- streets (Avenida Vejar street improvements Sierra Madre, Flacide and associsted Court) public facilities e At least 60 percent of the funds in each year will be ¢Ilocated to programs which will directly benefit persor~ o[ low- and moderate-income. The programs and funding allocations are cronsidered estimates and may be subject to change and/or addition. The community development programs to be pcepared Dy the city during the current 3~-year planning period will crontinue to pursue the primary objective o[ the CDBG program; however, new and/or innovative programs may be proposed in conjunction with the t-year programs which ere not speclficelly - identified in this 3-year community development and housing plan. JOB/018-0004 21 SHCTION V RHLOCATION A331STANCH POLICY None of the activities proposed [or funding this year or anticipated in 1988-89 would involve the d'esplacernenl o[ residents or businesses. However, in the event that displacement should occur, provisions for relocation assistance will be made in cronformance with the city's adopted relocation policy and the requirements of federal and state law. Recent changes in the regulations governing the expenditure of CDBG funds require that the city establish a policy governing the provision o[ relocation assistance to any Cemily, individual, business, nonprofit organization or Corm that results [ram implementation of it CDBG programs. It is the policy of the city to avoid displacement of all families, individuals, lusinesses, nonpro[il organizations and farms ir, carrying out its CDBG programs. No displacement is expected to result from the activities proposed for the 1988-89 Ciscal year. however, in e.he event that operation of any of the CDBG funded programs results in the voluntary or involuntary displacement of any family, individual, business, nonprofit organization or Cerm (whether owner or renter) the city wiB provide relocation assistance in accordance with the standards and guidelines set forth inthe federal Uniform Relocation Assistance end Real Property Acquisition Aet and Section 7280 (et seq.) of the State of California Government Code (Title 25, Chapter 6) and tlw guidelines issued by the Commission o[ Housing and Community Development. The city will meet its relocation responsibilities through the use o[ its staff and cawultants, supplemented by assistance from local realtors, social agencies and civic organiwtions. It is the city's objective that ell displaeees be relocated with a minimum oC herdshtp in aecoin inodatiore which arc decent, safe, snnitary and suitable to their individual needs; located in areas not less desirable tlwn their current location in regard to public utilities and public and commercial facilities, and reasonebiy accessible to their customers or places o[ employment and priced within their [i~utncial means. JOB/018-0004 22 - The city anticipates no relocations, and will handle those which result from imolementetion o[ CDBG activites in en individual case-by-case manner. Services provided to eligible displaeees shall include but not be limited to: o Providing information on project activities, rights, benefits and options open to them. o Maintaining liaison between displaeees and agencies or firms with resource to assist them {e.g., Chamber o[ Commerce, Small Business Administration, O[ticre vC LUeni ntiuon:c f:evalop-era, lcndirg institutions, realtors, etc.). o Locating, irepecting, evaluating or stimulating the production of aceomrnodations to meet the needs o[ all displaeees. o Assisting displaeees in obtaining Cinancing. o Assisting displaeees in securing priority consideration for Sect[on 8, public holtsing or other housing assistance programs. o Making referrals to appropriate social, community end welfare agencies. o Assisting eligible displaeees to prepare claims for all relocation essistence payments to which they are entitled. n Keeping records, maintaining Ciles and coordinating all relocation activities. o Providing ell families, individuals, twsinesses, institutions and farms which are displaced by CUBO-funded programs, wrtn wrrcren notice of iiris policy, the types of services available to them and the amount of relocation assistance benefits for which they may be eligible. (Payments will be those established by state and federal guidelines.) City staff and corsultan}s will he available to answer questions end provide information, and by their early involvement to see that relocation proceeds with e minimum of hardship. JOB/018-0004 23 SECTION n 1988-89 COMMMONiTY DEYELOPMENT PROGRAM In January 1988, when city staff was given en estimate of the amount of CDBG funding to expect in the 1987-86 program year, letters were sent to all community groups and agencies which had submitted program suggestions in previous years, as well as to city department heads. An advertisement was also published in the Daily - Report. The following orojecis were suggested for funding: o Program Administration (including fair trousing services) $83,400.00 - Inland Mediation Board - San Bernardino County Community housing Resource Board o Housing rehabilitation bare end grants (on-going program) No new funding o Senior shared housing (omgoing program) 6,300.00 o Avenida Vejar-design and corstruction (new phase of multi-year project) 167,000.OU o Sierra Madre/Placida Court design end construction (new phase of multi-year project) 202,000.00 o Ilomeless assistance (new public service) 8,000.00 o Senioc dental health (new public service) 5,600.00 o Enclosing patio at Neighborhood Center 86,000.00 On March 16, 1988, the City CouncB held a public henring to cronsider all of the ,., ,.... .. r.....,......o ..i rn.. .ociAnnra whir ...~, _._ __~ take testimcn° ^^ ..~~.. ^^ ln'opudeu VwJccm mw > m .., r .................... ...... .-...-_..._ ..__.. respect to block grant funding for these projects. A[ler duly considering the proposed projects and alternatives to the proposed projects which would eliminate or mitigate the Rood hazard impacts, the following projects, were selected [or preliminary funding. JOB/018-0004 24 1. Project Name: Noosing Rehabilitation Program Description Continuation o[ the existing program operated for the city by the County of Sen Bernardino. The program offers low-interest loans of up to $15,000.00 to eligible low- and moderate-income homeowners and grants of up to $1,500.00 to senicr citizens and disabled residents to make minor emergency repairs to their homes. The county hopes to make 15 loans and 30 grants in Ciseal .. l eA 6_q_n yce. CDBG Eligibility: The program is an activity eligible for CDDG funding under Section 570.202(c). PundinQ Requested No additional Cunds are requested Cor 1996-89. Une~ended funds from previous years wilt be reprogrammed to cover the continuing contract with San Bernardino County. Environmental 3tat~ This is a multi-year project. Environmental clearance was given in 1966, The program has not changed since then. Procedures to avoid potential noise, Rood plain end historic resources impaeLS are in place and still adequate. 2. Project Name: Senior Shared Hauling Desenpuon: Von[mueuon caw expausum or w: n.vauug ,iu~uc service program operated by Inland Mediation Board. Senior shared housing offers counseling to senior citizens to identify mid evaluate housing options. Where the senior can no longer live alone, counselors will attempt to locate a roommate or home to share, Cor those who want to remain as independent es possible. The services support the senior emergency repair grant program and the senior programs operated by the city through the neighborhood center end predominantly benefit low- and moderate-income seniors. iocatim: Citywide. CDBG niigitnliiy: a.: ,, ,,..~:..: ~.. r.,. rnun r.~...::..,. 5 piv~:a lig. vac .,.. a... ap .... ............. ...e corder Section 570,201(e)(3}. Fundlnlt Requested: Inland Mediation's funding request is proportional to the number o[ clients in the city. For 1988-89, they have requested $6,300.00. Rnvironmental Status: This project is a muitl-year project which is exempt JOB/018-0004 25 from Curther environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Aet (NEP A) 24 CFR 49.34. 3. Project Name: Southwest Cucamonga Street Improvements (Avenida Vejar, Plaeida Court and Sferre Madre, rprth of Arrow Roate) Description: This is the second year of a multi-year project to upgrade thz public infrastructure in the Southwest Cuca!nanga target sea. The imnrnvementc will ineiude design end engineering; roadway reconstruction; construction of curbs, gutters and sidewella; i~ataliation of street lights; and upgrading Cor water end sewer lines to bring them into compliance with current health and safety standards. Location: Jensus Tract 21 Gsee attached map). CDBG Eligibility: This project is eligible for CDBG funding under Section 570.201(ex9), (9) and (30). Funding Required: Engineering ;;36,900,00 Construction 332 100.00 t8b~'66b:b~ $327,300 in 1908-09 funds will be ellomted to this program end ;;41,700 in unexpended funds from previous years will be reprogrammed for this project. No other funding sources will 6e used Cor this project. Environmental Status: This is part o[ a multi-year project which will require environmental clearance for flood plain, noise, biology and historic resource impacts. M environmental review record has been prepared for the entire project and is on file at the Planning Division. JOB/018-0004 28 SECTION VII CITIZAN PARTICIPATION PLAN The City of Rancho Cucamonta encourages and solicits the participation of its residents in the process of identifying projects Cor funding by the CDSG. The citizen participation program consists of the following six elements: 1. Outreach. The City o[ Rancho Cucamonga encourages citizen participation, with a particular emphasis on participation by persons of low- and moderate-income and residents of older neighborhoods which are experiencing physical deterioration. In order to reach as marry residents and community groups es possible, letters will be sent to crommunity organiaetiorts and indivitluels who participated in the program in recent years. In addition, a display advertisement will be published in the Daily Report at least a month prior to publication of the preliminary statement. 2. Notice. The City oC Aancho Cucamonga provides citizens with advance notice of all meetings related to the CDBG program and makes copies oC all related material available Cor publir. review, as soon as notice is given. Notice of the hearing on the preliminary statement of community objectives will be published on in tlw_ Deily Report, 10 days prior to the hearing. Notices will also be published in public places throughout the city with special postings in target areas. a. Technical Assistance. Community groups sad particularly lower-income --'~-•.~••~T lnnb n.e Hmo and 4nnwlydor nrrweCarv to deVelOD a 6.....,.., y-,,..._~ proposal [or CDBG funding that satisfies statutory requirements. The City o[ Ratteho Cucamonga publishes the names and telephone numbers of staff familiar with the CUBC program who ere available to at>swer questions and help residents package a proposal. 4. Poblic Iiearin .. The City of Rancho Cucamonga uses public hearings to obfam mhzen's views and to respond to proposals and questions at all stages of the program. A hearing is held on the preliminary statement o[ community objectives at which the city's Igirsing mtd community development needs are reviewed, past policies and programs ere discussed, end each proposed project is explained. A preliminary selection of objective; arM programs is then mach end published for public review and comment. The hearing on the final grant application is held a month later. All hearings are duly noticed. Agendas and staff reports are ~~I able ;n nnpwrnn and tiro mrntinvs are i,eid iii the LiGri 5 GErtei. 'rihich is fully accessible to the handicapped. 5. Accessibility. Beveral o[ the older neighborhoods have substantial hispanic populations. At meetings where it is likely that the attendees wiA not be bilingual, the city will provide an interpreter to ensure that residents can understand and participate in the procedures. JOB/018-0004 27 -- 6. Responsiveness. Once projects have been funded and are underway, the city is committed to ensuring the satisfactory execution of each project. Steft is available to explain the program end discuss projects. Staff _. provides a timely response to a6 written complaints-usually within 15 working days. In the 5 years that the city has operated a CDBG program, - Cewer then 5 written criticisms have been received. Citizen Participation Plen Implementation for 1988-89 included the following featwes: 1. Outreach. Letter soliciting program suggestions were sent to community - groups on January 7, 1988, and a display advertisement to alert the general public was published in the Daily Report for February 1, 1989 (copy attached). 2. Notice. Notice of the public hearing on the preliminary statement o[ community objectives on March 16, 1988 was published in the Deily Report on March 4, 1988. o Technical Assistance. Stet[ responded to inquiries end assisted several groups to provide the necessary information for an application for CDHC - Cunds. The agencies so assisted were: o The VIP Club 0 1Nand Mediation Board o Concerned Citizens for Community Awareness o San Bernardino County CHRB o San Dernerdino Coumty Dental Hestth 4, Public leavings. The public hearing on the preliminary statement o[ community objectives was held March 16, 1988. Notice of the hearing was published on March 4, 1988. 5. Accessibility. [C necessary, interpreters will be provided at all hearings. No interpreters were unecessery for the March 16th meeting. 6. Responsiveness. No written complaints cn the CDBG program or its operation were received in 1987-88. JOB/018-0004 28 ~ 1 ~y~ T H ^~ w~ W //~~ ,v ~~/~ ,v W O C ~~ 1 A~ TO `Ep~C ~ ~~W.S S. e timc ~„ CO G~'~~ ~5=~ `~~ a NaWa~o v wS S~C`~og °' ~fc wn `yT m ~~~vTgv $~ `m °dv: 04~ 4 d~~~j~jw~ ~~~ Q$~Q~ TT G 9 ~ ~ v 5 5'~ W ~ 6Y ~ Y ~F~..~ny~o~ d"y°C$~"m~~ ~- ~. ~. ~.. Z n. fA Z r• n. O_ Z_ LL F- Q wziw~a¢t°~J'm~.a Uaa°1 Wp0 W ~~¢ Q YYLL N-W+G IZL~? a 'g' mi`~~o=~¢oa 2 p Z = ~ 41 ¢ O= ~ a h m.~ ~~~s ~$~ m `~ ~~~~ ~~~~'~~~~yW v'e5 °~ " a -~ 9 y oZ °s5.~~~~?~s~gC°5°~E e g ~oa~~~a3 $~a 9'•7 °e V m ~~~g~y ~ ~~'~~&~ C ~a~m'e °a~ ~ ~~~~~~ .ae~m$a~~P a o~~$'~~ ~~~ ~5~~ S ~p.y m r .5y vvs~~,> y W -JO ~ .P V q~ ~ 0 0 ~^g~ ~ °, E~ yy.Yv~~ ~'n'vS ab~i c °v~,g$ ~aLv% $'a~°c ~"odP 8~~. ~~~ ~~o ~~~~~' `d~my~m~~ESe v o. ~,g ~~=`v W,~~gycy~~vga. seavm 9~°>:oE o,yw ~~av ~,o ^$B 8i°~~~~~s W~o„m z°g~.~cyT~p~~$~8uu~sm u~P~ bo~~5Eggs~~ a~: ~, `+ ~a ~_ 3 w h ~ Q j Q W H W W Ii 3 Z V 0 v c v ~c O Y Z L ~ ~ ~~ ~ o ~~ FW N E v = c ~ N o a ~ O E~ Ng~ ~a on M~~ O O LL O N¢ a ~ ~ 3~' a w - OL V P ' g '^ ~ 9 in r go 00 ~~ ~~ "'~-s a m ~ m D O S ° N O P ~ U 2'~c V ._ O co ~ O O ~ m ~ °' 0 0 0 ~ " rn ~ v Z m~~ _ `o E ~ o o i n ~ m~~ >'O pj E E O c E n o rn p'a m o f c ° m~ Z c p° o m~ m~ E ~ ~ c .Y ~° °.n n 'm a o v° v o ~ o' Q V -O o ° V Q °mnaov$~ m E mm ~' v`a V'~ s°mcooLE oc o~ v LLm ~ 0 a;~cm~E°E °p °E ~ [ °o U V n`u m nm m° ov oc E c gno > O > O ~~ °`cr a~~as QE a; °~ cof ~~ ° ° I- h ° V ~ O ~ - m E_'-_ _o m c Li ~ °1 Ur m ~ LL Q lO ro t° O m ~ = p 0 ~~ ooa°~°~m °O "E E mo`m ~,,, ~ u m ~ a„~v E c m m~ ~ , V Q omu °~'c`m m E mm ~ ~'«°-x O o ° c~ o n` t mm~crEmn._ t m~ v oo.J. W omom»'O-°~ rm c~' o Ev° V Z'~ ~ m~-m ° E o n ~v o o° m a c° 9 L c V 6« O V Z N N~` N° U„o O x ~ E Ei5 0 °a ~ E$ 0 Q H Q V m a Q D Q y O a z O m y~ J ~ U 0 O h n T C G a u 9 ~ E C a ~ ~~ u ti `o a .c~U~ ,a,aaa a ~c t ~ u 0 .7 C 9 ¢ 9 R IQG <+ ~a., W y y Q.L O C 9 Jc v p y ~ m N ~ ~~ u'~Y.~ ~I, .~ •5 a ~" 4 , ~. o •I d L N R79 c~ d a m5 y O ~~ ~ ~~ ~I~~7 ~ C W i j I pp .5 ~~7.( o o ~ N'i 17 C• W N ~ U' % F i rj Z ~' U~ ~ ~ a M ~ i- , ~~ N i Ri ~~ W ~ V i F ' I ti. a ~ l a v z ~ p i ~ C ~ d y' 4 ffUJJ O m9 n m '/ m ~ ~ o vl ~I + ° +1 ++ < ~ •~; ~ m ~ ~ ~ z° ~ ~ v° I a ° ° ' ~ k i I A ~ ~ ~ s s ~ qO 'O N v m A w 0 ro O .y O ~ V A N ~ SS9 i•', 'a se's in .AF: November 27, 198) Mr. Otto Kroutil Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga ATTEiiTiuii: i•iS. rliki Batt P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Kroutil: U.S. WPMn of Hou~lnq ar0 UeWn D~vNopm~nl Los AnOelas Nea OI L<e. nlO~On IC 1615 Wzsl Olymmc Boule rei0 LOS Anpllli GblJOlnla 900 15 380 1 cmw~ ,_., .-ucn AN ::..; .~ i~?7 4 SUBJECT: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program _ Annual Housing Rssistan ce Plan (HAP) - Approval City of Rancho Cucamonga - Grant Number: e-88-MC-O6-0556 In accordance with 24 CFR 570.306 and current instructions, this Office has reviewed your Annual Housing Assistance Plan for the period October 1, 1981 through September 30, 1988. Based on our review, we find your Housing Assistance Plan to be acceptable and it is therefore annr nv ad Arrmm~lichmentc toward vnnr HAP anals will be reviewed annually. Sin ely, n , l ,lpC)4n lapin _ Benjami F. Bobo, Ph.D. Manager - Los Angeles Office, 9,45 ?~I -. > o 2 V o c 3 N } ¢ o ,F V O 0 T U FF a - o~ w0 >M1 a I- Z mzI 6 QVQ ~u~ U amo Q _- uFF F. zwz ~y^ 1fW 41 ~o.+ 4 ~ ~ °wi 2 iOW N w} I~ ~ U ~J nF OF ~U I I I o < ,~ ~ 1 x N ~ .. ~ o_ `' i ~ - I ~ O: F V I~ < U 'J U ~ O_ ~ < o ~ n w ~ ~ s i F m o ti o 0 0 0 _ ~ ~ .. 1/ o ~ _ _ ... _ ... _ ~ Y ~ n o z o 0 0 v o ~ f. v .. Y i Q 2 rn S e o ° N 2 L L L i 3 - o ~ -je v v N N - ~ "' K s o: z N of % 0 m V o IE w ~ :O_ ^ Y~ Q= W 2 VI N .-y N ~e ti H ~ j~ '~ O ~ ~ ~ 2 I O !O 6 ` N mI :Dn ~Q ~ Z Z i .. L E ~ E _ ~ _ a J T a - e a ~ N ~ ~ c I~ _ =` ¢ E o o a C 6 ~ a ~ N ~ p m 'L L = V a d O L .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m `- ¢ - ~ m U 6L ~ I L C .'. `~ . V ~ N ON L N N W w ~f ~ ~ . t ~ ~ E ' W O ii L 7 ^-. g ~ °i m ~ o ~ 1 ? ° , . , ~ O m= o~ N c c. =~ n ~~ s ¢ o • a N ~ _ ° o o-~ o e l b T ~ 'i rn 'O N O - - 1- C J I li 'I I _ _ VI u j~ I~ _ ~ C N O 'O y Y f`"1 F. q ¢ ~ N s m o m 4, c ~ c N V L ~ d C ^ C~ ~n N T N [D N N .j n ~ u b ° N C N ~ N _ 7 C L N N N N ~ a I _. o ~ L N o N ~'~ ~ ~ ~ F lT 2~ j I l N N O W L l ~' ~ `I e G' q L N 2' Y U C t N w O 1 I .C rn La m S G ~ ~ Z o 0 - o n N ce c. o 0 0 e ~ 9 o ^ V ~ I- u ~ SJ r p - ~ O ~- ? 4 A I I I ,n m .. ° c n~ m ° ~' ii ~ ° n ' ~ O S ~~ i ,~ K + L ~ o ~ ? ' c ° '.' m o N o O 4 ~ a = ~ .. ~.i r n O ~ I i a i ~; is ~° ~- CITY OF RANCHO CIA;AIIONGA NARRATIVE FOR 3-YEAR AND 1-YF1R COALS 1987-88 HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN B Displacement No substandard units are expected to be demolished or lower income households relocated as a result of direct federal, state or local actions. II. Actions The City Will Take To Implement Its 1- and 3-Year Goals A. Mortgage Revenue Bonds (owner) The Redevelopment Agency sells mortgage revenue bonds to provide below market mortgage. financing for owner occupants. Most users will be moderate income, none are expected to be low income. An issue funding at least 66 mortgages sold in 1986. fie goal will be realized, therefore, subject only to market conditions and the developer's ability to develop and sell the homes. B. Mul tT-Family Revenue Bonds (renter) In 1985, the City took over cperations of the multi-family revenue bonding program. No new developments have sought funding using these bonds. Prior to 1985, the City had a cooperation agreement with the County of San Bernardino, under which rental projects in Rancho Cucamonga with 20 percent of the units restricted to low income households at rents less than 30 percent of income, could be financed with county multiple-family mortgage revenue bonds. Some 385 addlti onal units were proposed. Developer interest Ts currently very strong. However, market conditions and developer performance will dictate whether the units committed are completed. C. CDBG Rehabilitation Loans Through a contract with the County of San Bernardino, The City offers low interest rehabilitation loans to lower income h nucrhnidc Pity-wi Ae. gpPrnximataly A,5 rlnitc nar year nr 25 units are anticipated to be brought up to standards through this program. However, in both 1985-86 and 1986-87, only four loans were completed each year. All owners are lower income, City staff has an aDDOintment with staff of the County of San Bernardino to discuss ways to improve performance under this program. 1987-88 HOUSING . ISTANCE PI AN B Page 2 Rental rehabilitation loans are intended for structures to be occupied solely by lower incase renters. Rents after rehabilitation may not exceed 30 percent of tenant income. Five units were anticipated to be brought up to standard through this program during 19d5-8G and five in 1986-87, but no loans were completed, In order to improve the performance of the owner occupied rehabilitation loan program and to implement the Rental Rehabiiitation Program, Lire %ity of Rancho Coca ~.nga «ill a~eet with staff of the County of San Bernardino to identify changes to the program which may need to be adopted to make them more effective. The City will continue its publicity campaign to make eligible households and property owners aware of the program and the possible benefits of pa rtic~pa tion. E. Section 8 Existing (or successor program) The City has entered a cooperation agreement with the Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino to administer the - Section B existing program and the housing voucher program. The goals reflect the reduced funding for this program and the fact that rents in the City are often higher than fair market rents. F. Arttcle XXXIV Referendum Autherity Prior to incorporation, voters within the City of Rancho Cucamonga aooroved a referendum allowing public ownership or financing of low rent housing pursuant to Article XXXIY or the State Constitution as a part of a larger county-wide authorization. This enables use of public housing and various multi-family housing financing programs. There are currently 11 units of scattered site public housing in the City. - The City has entered into a Cooperation Agreement with the Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino for use of -- the Public Housing Program. No funding is anticipated for this program in the third Housing Assistance Plan Year. However, agreements are in place should funding become availa6l e. G. Affordable Housing Incentives State IoM regUlreS Cities t0 OTier incentives (inci udi ny public improvements or density bonuses) to any protect with at least 25 De rcent of the units affordable to low and moderate -- incase households. Several of the planned communities in Rancho Cucamonga contain commitments for the development of - affordable housing in the text of the approved or proposed _ Community Plan. The developer commits to develop a percentage of unit at prices or rents affordable to low income households, in exchange for city incentives. 1 ~ -88 _. _a ISIL. t PLAN B Page 3 H. Redevelopment Twenty percent of tax increment funds from the City's redevelopment projects will be used to assfst low income housing development as necessary and as funds become available. % ~ e ~~ ~ /o;/~ • i i ~0io° 5, Y/ //~~ PAGE City Couoeil Agenda ,/ October 21, 1987 14 Ni..n ___ _ L RESOLOTION N0. 87-374 A Rffi0101ZON OT THE Q?2 ODONCCL OT THE Q1T OY RANQIO O7C/1MDNGA, GLI}ORNIA, DENTING A R8Q0ffi? TO AMEND 171E LAND D9E ELROSNT O[ iRE GBNffiAI. PLAN, AMENDMEN? N0. 87-04D R15jDESS TINS ~ ~ A CAAffiE IN THD LARD IIBE Dffi IGHATION PAOR OTTI QI SV NLIGHDORHOOD ODMMpIQAL fOR 3.38 ACRffi LOGTED OM THE St70T8NEST QJANa Oi I LONITA fY7DRT AND AA®ZDALD AVENGE - APN 202-131-33 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSffiSM6H! AND DEVELOPI~NT DIETRI CT Cont, t0 AIOfNDIH[NT 87-03 - NEIAIQ PROTIDtTI63 - A regWat to 12/16/87 ueod the Detelop~ent District cap frw "OP• (Office/Trolusiwal) to •8G• (Maighborhood Cossszcial) for 3.36 stiu o! land located oo the Ieatheeat cornez of Lwiu Coort end Archibald Mesw - AT11 202-131-33. RE80LOSIOA E0. 87-373 A REBOLOTIOH OT THE QY'! LbD11CQ. OT THE QT! OT RAN®0 m0A1DICA. CALITOMIA. DENlIt(. DEVELOFi~IiT DISTAIQ ®AtriE NO. 87-03, IWDffiTIlRi A QAIOE IH THE DY89lIQ DEBIDNAT'IDH TROM OTTI OE/TROIEEDZOHAL 1V neiu®u.YYVY Wlef<eWIW Nn a.~e AUI~ LOG?tm OH 19E SW'!dl®i mE11tR Ol LOMI?A OODII? Alm AEQIDALD AVAmE - APII 202-131-33 7. WABIDEM?f0A OT ODMIHIQIT DEVEWTlaNI' DLOOI CRANT gpprovld HOOBIE4 A86I6?AIIa P(r11f - Approeel L ratwesnded for ;.0-1 (Buquet the 19 -66 Howing Assistrce nsn r/61c6 is the third amyl lnerrat oL the ehru yur plae required o! participuu is the Ooemit? De~siop~eni Dloeh Grre progrr o! the Dapardant o! Hov~ipg ud 8rhan Deralepaent. B. ENVIAOIMEHfAL ABBEBBIRHP AAU DEVELOP!®!1' WDE AIfElO1QNf Cont. to 87-01 - QTL' Oi AANt710 ODGfgNOA - An rsndunt to 11/4/87 Title 17 of the Mmicipal OoG peruining to the i i i a~r,~iti ~ •.3 ~__ _ _ _a7c~mg Lacil itiN and - ' W the criteria !or design, locatiw and opsatiw o! snch facilities. ~~, \ rr ,; ~l . r r ."^.:,r,R ,~ ' ~J 7 r ~'h,r; `Y`l~ ~ ,. `l`r ~.! CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 2), 1987 Pmi LMlrtc Bm PU1, Rrn[nn cYL,r'.~rl. CXnlmm~ Vli lll, I~IL VX4IASV Fred StillTons Community Development kepresentative U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Oevel opment 1615 West Olympic Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90015 SU&1 ECT: 1987-88 HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN Dear Mr, Stiltions: Attached is one copy of the 1987-88 Housing Assistance Plan, Form 7091.2 and accompanying narrative. The City Council approved this year's HAP increment at an advertised public hearing held on October 21, 1987. If you have any questions please call MTkT Bratt at (714) 989-1861. Sir rely, /~ / COt2~tUN~T~~~~ E!{T DEPARTMENT PLAN N/, I////~/f'/D I ION//® ~ ~~ Otto r utii Deput City Planner OK: B:vc Attachments ~ ~, N rZp CT IwD> n rf~fl~f rw.,l,..~,. .r...• DeMnh N, Brnxn hnreY Kmp can M.wn rlnnnl Sbvl Chrtles /. apdnfl 11 PXmelXl Wnphl I~urmM Wn,erm.n