Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988/05/04 - Agenda Packetr~ u r1 U I1 -- ~-: ~, CITY COUNCIL - AGENDA ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I REGULAR MEETINGS Ist and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:30 p.m. May 4, 1988 Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road RAIIChII ('11CAmr1n _QA • 0 Clty Councilmembers Dennis L. Stout, maye. Pamela J. Wright, Maror Pro-7'rm Deborah N. Brown, co~~drmrmer. Charles ]. Buquct, coundrmrmar. Jeffrey King, cnanrlrmrmber ss• ~ 1.A~1rrn M. WACCerinfllt, r;y xr,..ae.r James Markman, arr Arromry Beverly A. Authelet, crry nr,.t City lMce: 9g9-1951 Ions Park: 9&1-3145 ~ 621 M1 <~ TI f 2 III tl U T~ V L 0 m O f Yi 4 1 as 0 ~.'-.~~o°n<io°oo~wo.Pil~c°.-N. °o oon °o ,°~or~ o.m.Nmu°.'O~°o~~°.sM1 O°io rv~m 00 vNOV.10 Y. N./IVm n• ~n WM1 mPOrNmYNmI~mPO^rvmv~~.On mPONNmv~n mO On00000o~+n r.1 r.~n r.~.~rvnnrvnnNnnnmmNmmm vOCI .- n O r uN ~ w O > O ° W D N ~ inH n Oi N2 2J 62 Z aP .amp i a< i~ ~-p i~ si ie'• a ° u u.~ at a5 € n Y u ,7 •J N.ui WU WF Sa u~ ~m O V V a r 6 V 0 < 0 p O J J U h w u o r n i V a <u N N f rY m P w ~O J OC; mV~i Zj 6 6 Y2 6 ¢ Knn So a~ WO <w w Wia ., P.owM1 z aN ;u a m hV im G ~ _ _ V1 mw ~~ _ i~ .. M ia l ~ N " i Q F <~+N tI ~ zn 2nw L SrZ ' V~OnUI _nYm 60mp yO 'J 1- jWLLf <•ZJNO KtN2 rJ J W Y LL+w V 2~ mm ~ O2 UV '+Y C1 w NU W 62Y <wL 20 ,1 0 2 o m W ~ ~I YSW< <U<O 0 x+5 J N m ~Tu m M1 o N V O~V V n' 2L r +in I - r -• < < h% N~6 UVN;mrw2 N wKN6Nw m a < oui~w n'p fN~ O rZYH2r ia R'.x '.n~YG ~ Y6mLL<(LL<m7Y 1~ 76N6NW wowi~JhwJwJ r<orcN",<w<o W..o mo GNWLn mNNaNSnQm-.mmRr-WOmouN z m U Z 2 ~ N w V 6 I V 2 O .+ r n u _ °a mW Z < L > <Ut ~• '' _ io N. .m - ~6 6 r Q i ` < ~ ° " 2 < rc ~r J 2 u ~ +ia o - ~o Y ~i n Y J N O wO W ' ~ z Wh mm iwiu POZNOON TSa i. n . v i 2n ncP6wM1Z~o..mN SWw ~sn°N J rYYH t9JhN0 ZJ YN 7I-O` F 3 « p ~ aU >U<2<aVw JmvIJF6KY2N _ 0 Sa =1- _ 02LL2 2 OWiw w <W6P• N2WrW OW<OV r O jwNVFJKY ~ r N < <W U <ZJ pp0 Y~1'• Zti YV WfwoM1l-n Y'mNhNZJhU<N WJYZw W r f 6r6 _ _ V~+JZnm'RNO <WOrM~ ZrnOp r«<m««f«mmmm20 UUIVUUV r1 FO•'~J OI-.yOP•mNrrh~lr-~ml-rip Om mlrl m ^~O MJ myOM1 NN^IM PrNNODYaNNhP Y~NM1 N1n 0.ti Pm Pm NFh.f y»mFJn yH r ^ y r r 1 l :F rY ~•r yOrwy~Yir YiyyNNyOyrJ Y r dP/y~PWy rPPPNyPddW WPP POPydNNywPOdMdPPdPwpdNPPmyy LPOOPYdP yf NPWNlwmWwdyO-ryPNdyPwON NPryP J•w IT r NSO 2:mYYL10NOy00ZTO ~y{TTTD>mi00>(ll (1 (fin NOOfIA AA 1 m pC2DOym0 »>1 »CCOOCOy>00~~"~• I-rTZ()O>2m22-~yZTZYDNNNYPy<ZwDOm<D9>CSfI>y1 'T _>•_+RT <mM (lO2rTyy (l. OTn~O>_ _OKmr3>D.[D YY O OTD TNK ~_ ZSiP O •TKT 1'1 C f C 1 O>f2 >CNrP~nm OmN N )__ 00 NY ODO>r <(12 (t N y OrpNT SK M1 a>Tr > HT ~FJ[ nNmC>NO{"r2 (10 (1Y23T 1 S~ m O y() ZTOT tiV :rmOT»OyG O Op 00 • -DAFT N01A2ArYN OYOm > Am`y' y>ti r m2 n C^__Ny2Z Cf DTy9 mS C_(lPOm2 S nV P ry(1 O STyO„ FO2011 1 2Z> y~aN> O mN S Il l"rDyA2Y1nN n moo F ,y 00 c y > m Z03 y00 p D F 9ti T n mym ( N< c µ9 =Nm 4 Z 00- ZO y M1 ~+ > > A m ~ Ao m ( ~2T N 00 . ti_ T T N ~~~ - Z!~ T ~ Tm< mmy • 2<~+ NNZ _ m >T O y n _ _ n ~ 2 mL • ZNmm99TCmC NNAOmTmym9mOp< TOm~TmmrOTT2 ATDN n9TTDmD~TyWT2 OT30DrwO0ymm~oNTyTOyTTDN2Y>y TSCC~y• C.1yy TC<>T29 T OCyO>OyCr-1rmyN m~oc2 n Zn P> 2\P P(10T ~(r2m2r2m2S» O••NNOON>mmOD C » 9lTC0D0 wDOWrripOP OOm Y1C TZ Nm(1009TDNApyn3>3y~y l'ImSm>Din>Tr pyi mi<TSOD c mT<T>TT TyT Om>OySmO_2J01•Np mSm NN <TTyAAOZNYYyZ>OmCm NnDPRb m(1NN D••n_T2 TN~oTy YT~ Glm\N m>Sp2fPT Z-yPPyw NN9 OS(l~N 'y„T yNilP NMMmNh PPOti O PO>n ~R~N A[1D Tm f' NO D I'N m 2ti TSK OD OmJm[ O Dp O >O A mC nmD T~ m r • D 2. a yn P mNYZ >y ,1 ~A<Y F• T r m mmD >\ >N im T t)NLC ~- m Dffn' ymm (f pTm~mrN r.n Smm S RWTn > 3\ RHO Z R 2M2>P » O o`o :'.n p fmo mP no T Nm>y T A m NOO AT. P m TAT Vy C N N O N 9 m2 u+N uTi uZi ~n u1NN PNf NrOdRyPVf WNrOdRyPV~f WNVOdP-IP PfWN~OdRyP RwyyROwpv~O wOPfN~OU ~Oy~NPyw~d WyNNyNr~yNr Py00000w00~'OrOOw p(O}ONVI.OfOpONOU00w JN.ONOOf Nr C > m A T O E 2 Y z n ono..woo rop opoooo..PO n, ooppNOOmooorvwo =°on o~n P~n Pop oNOOnP..o on'oaopPO..~,.,o..P..vn m 9Nhn~..i y ,. no .n ao.~M1 ni mrP rv,., .. ao.. mi-m ,. Ln -,r moo.. u ~~ .. P .. o r v .. ~ ~ 9n p.+rvmnY PPwry nlaanCPO~+nn.r a.pn POw RPPPPPPOOn0000pOOw. J i rv~NrvNryrvrv N.v rvNnrvNrvNrvrvNryrvrvNNnhNNNNNNnNnNrvNNrv < lw r.... Pwu W6 ua. r w S ¢ Flrv,m in ¢ Oy _,u m W _~r ^Vrww N.r Wm O<rS iOr - P !!rl-6W Vq ! ,<L WtiW! UV V,6„W ¢V WJwV ~ ¢ w < MuNW lV6W ¢ r rOLL ~ U< N wm` >W ¢orv `¢oporJpmWN :0'4 ?~oo ~oaScwoi~y !%aa WalW m"oNrumes.¢. ¢iw~`+ a azNy a°~mz s<~W ~WJjzzz..`N°.<`H¢wi$z ¢.iJOW~o i•w•~~N~W~ w pxi o .-J >w <.. w. zw-.w~ipu i>2ruun}VVYri ~NwrWiVV ~- v,V Off'-V~n 2mJYm=¢yi Vl-Nw a<rv K.+w<p OiNJgOF{p7u....<<~'Jrr<2rii .uru Ip~--+-~vw.nY6Zjz~~¢wpN2 .' 2 umu6 O~i¢pMLL6`r~jYr9-KY6<K¢7 K> ..owmoda,a., .'. ,. w..W oe ~,~,~ ~ o..W NwwNanWwwpW¢ u~uwma$>w'OOJ>< ~<aa <p><pwW>wzxw ,. a¢P <p~W U~n¢¢~-w air. ~a¢m~npmNS<pzrv,n ,n r i z p ~ ~ .. ~„ z ti ¢a U p U rc ~ t UU > ~_ Q u> „z~.~ v O'er U N_ w'_)V L2 ~-Z 2 iZ t2r N UI-p T}YWZJW r_ ON ¢ ~r 7N ~¢¢Y pV,ZF at7 U_xWJ¢ ZwpJp2 ~V S '-ry ¢NHY VuVn yS w rp2rr< n¢SJ> Or-r O,n ~.rt Mw Z~np SNOpO~n W,nY VF >LUJ.OI- O wr+ Sp-JN<~SwMVZ ¢atpt¢WOrW = ~ ¢ pJ L~-wVm2Nw¢jo2 OOWJp¢ J ~ VwW1MjJZy`w <wpp p .. su.. ii-W a:x zJ soaiw < r i Ls~ihi noNa'rc~i .wcWY.<.rrY oc~"sTa Si .J.,<as-n1<-_JOix.2-W J ; UOJJrWw6w¢mm`J~UJ6<SW~S `¢`G¢6¢Jr%2`¢rYJ i-OL>W rnxiYMNn~~piOxm<Y03Y¢<J~J,Ln! i SJ6 -J ~ p w I O T 1 ~; NPmaNPam~I'OryFa00TmPrymP O.yNaUT m.nm NryNnOma~ra p rOr~-omrOnnnPrrvF~rrra~am0~/a~ mUm 'f 1 nPPP rnnwm PN„NN a~aNm N 1 .~ wrrrr n .~ .+r .~ .wrw N 3 N Waa.°•~o~.'..mrWWyaWU000-~iN.~.PP~ Ni. .r.`~ N.•.-um:a NNWOd~mdP~PN~•-mOP000NP OP-~POrmNPOMViN•--•a lm V 9i>O OOOSrOp» >1NM'>1mD>p"j'TDw99959999999y > > AADA001'~N»Y> DCCCZ O•n222z2Zn<2ZZaO 9~Z Z•+n TGTmy Z-IOOnCn•+ 'z.cr rr~ S:.cz m m i nnz ooyM»mmPTr x§' mmmmr'.N' .°..mm,m..r AaDpyr ~~:,o °aPOi.,Nm„<ry..'m° TOODDDT FN>mppD3•+mTTNY nL>Drn4 rn br9 rCS2Y YmmY022Z U•+rr r• G1rv^•nZ C'tHmN9Nm \ > a +c.o nmr~.rT c 9~+os - o-~onr9n N->ionni• p nnno anNx°arz casozsz i r YfnNNmNDOpoTmaDD Foo Co3 >•_n ZOpa r p o c m2rrONar DmC NCOCZ O rNOT>COaOZT NprO-1=mrn z `~ i9 >zm zmmmm.. mz> n P "oa c am9N<oc<m<N Apzrm..a .. rior cii > KDr raa c'rm i~'- n z'YN mo zoooNp iirN ar eii r999.+m n N Npm ov~o m:zr o ~ >c zzz` x o nN.• Y r ro < z n °D no c nnnm n t 9cz - z .z z ;s r >. < < T'/'TCY••C%tmCm<TpjT20>GSOmA922m~~>4COmTYntim m 99rrT OrONSXmOT O90m9pZOTmNrZw~'A O.PrC mrr92• 1>9Tm nCZmO.0.-IC 9PrDNOY DrY c22m imrr9rpNaz N.• ^•I NO•+ZPZ('19 >iZOi_NT „OOSimNNPOf ~T2C „N > rZ>G~^ >mmm p mN2 m rpimr< ANNp~+ -~NSO NT~rN nTn (1F O_nTT rN+ rnn mOyyAUT <Y~ 39> u'•~mSNH Z > Z O>9r<9p N>iy nTODTPm yPZ zm PtNii C)>r m~>~mrZ 'n P L-•w C m OP r> S> 9 M ^r0 >;rN200n >RN TP C finrTmYO m<2 O Tm0 OS PO ~~ P rrPNTZnm 1 > r N O 3mC PSZ JO n ma 2 • O OOi9 2 mrl n0•- •+tii 5 O 2 .N+n r Rn m NnTI'Ina TnZ Y1'1 Tn _ ml'1 >Z H p r CCt m O NCOyOf GOT=y 03 ODO Z S> SZ n W Y 2ZSZ2 •'10 r r p m D P(•ml T PDPPZ PP• rP PP m PW SN~+ N y~N N NNN V~ NN N v rNN vWWv hNivNNnNNNNNNNNN N IWi~nnWNn~VNwNNW NvNNNNNh WNNNNNNNNVN••r m-iPVI.WNrO.SOmrP ~).wv~-O.p psr P.n ;.WN•'OdPyP P;.WNrOdm r•r Om N T P LmN¢rNPr ~ddyrPNNdOrHNWNWWAdd;PmPwwdNOON •~O PPrN~dOdPWPahr NOO NdV'Pw v0-•OOU•IN OVO^~NlPO;UNNdvmOOPNONwO POJOWO PNONP0.0t~000NNOV-IPmPwU-'OO d•-OLOP.w OV W0.~00~10 •'O > f < O T I T ~ T D i O C 2 n 0.'A Z 1 } h oh""'~O "~ ° + ° ~ry ° ° BO r ° ° o c a F m q - o n O o... .~ u.mPOmrv ~. a~-oN m : a , ~i- a+n o ..h - _~ n h i .: .o .. ° i i + ~+ Z PO.n ~Vmlin .Oh 9PUnnm+u. P aaaaaaahr-.-I-hhh.-r- V T I Niv .~NnnnnrvnNnrvrvnNNnn^.n J V .n ti `r ti F. U u. ¢ _ < u~ OY ~ q ~ ! W rn W W W W W ~ WN ¢ L 6 N b°< o r~W«3 ahVU'WN O wU »Y a2J W JnJF r<iO~dq~n sG r ~: ioi wi<¢iw~ ~" ~g ° ~~ so<ww w¢mYmm u n uo S z<z<N u zoca2 mi< ~ an i ~¢°¢wzw 0~~.¢w 720w.- rYa ~6 U N~nmww wL0<n.-~nO 2 w7w..wmZwgwr.~p« 062 [Y]in v.60<w6+~.¢N¢ <L`m6u 6 ~ ~ W 02 m u.. ` a N < r x J ~n °W ' wi -u'i < < wq qi. . S M 2 ¢¢¢ u..2 S ui ~ r-u z zzYn WJ m ¢O 6y2 2w0¢mt~ w ~ ° Y wsw< wzw mu. l~r wq2~ ¢~f.2¢ ~U Q w3~~ Y T 6~ oVU6 ® m ` ¢ F { JO SOYY 3 ~Z ~ OSw ~ °~ izi~~us ~ w o z Y . <~ . ¢ z w «¢w.. ~. ~n .~..~~.n¢x~¢..<¢¢w m ~~ i i o .- »>uatz v.z i PmOmNrO tiIOMNFmmN.y m~lm n^. + nl+hdu JI-n~yiagwh or^mi-har aom h 1 .,. .. , ,. -Ni Pir N°a r° N U°o'~ P.~ald+m .m. lulu W r a N v i ! . . Pr !d POPdWW N'-N PPrm P W P r p r y i IY rJ 1< y wmP»i»iDf y>Y C ;r~ O A N P f 1 m P AO N g S~ im z ~e N ~ A i c i i P I i. m >z_N yOy rI m m O ~ M >TZ A -1 zn ~F m ~ m T P1AONnn F i2 A m ~ n > e A S m ,D I mmam N noon man .°-~ n~ma.iizfi~i>ao mr. yo° .F. o s e 'Y N ~ i ~ c m ~ miz n orAmmzrm.n <s ~. ~ H n i r am a viN ~o ~m isa Pns° n ~ s z ~ a i o < N o s m i ~ ~zzr>.. z N m z` ne~.mm ~~' zy a "~ sN nz > r rl .. T oy o ~ zm N '° 2 w m ° m x nN An • 2 K r M j m O n Dr ZZ n A 1 N _ N a I S A O K N -~ I - t A M1 > A S I T • V 1 r 1 '1><NTPOpSnWA nN> araro<>m..-Imgo iryT d T o a 1R N n 1 N cn aaDOrmNrws..azTm AO mcm i o N s a z o x m x ~....cmAmr.+N mr r-IK mNy i i r ° a . i.. OzA 7r aN1 DL'S NP a>N>mP°fl »r I i>N N c m s _ ~ IT rxK2aZ~Aynam gi ~ 02 I n r ff m > > a 1S .. sozm .ms izyzzym Na W .. m <zyr > ed .. i z o A z m < m m o s .+ 1 I o '2 ntiOtiaOKOL KN111m m 0 s l'1rNS ° e M S _ A ° C yy y 1 NG DO~~O'I1y N ~ y 1 N l F `nm fl Ty nN .V N A 9 x A > a I y a> m O ON mfT sr o mc;eno. z N L T yw a m a < < T a V H 1 \N» 9 0 Ny n a < A < m O n r. N Z 1 y Z n N O nT2 n N 2 n N m N PT 1 i ice > c P P ° -In 1 n :: z N T N s N o m ~ r 's 1 I r` '~ >y ' m i n N p . . . ° i A 22m S T - A T A A m r y m0 Y Z a r ~ N O 1 R N O m N ~ r 0 j O N I . ~ n vNNVNNNNNNNNNVNNNNNNNN N NN N N NNNN NNN N N IL C wWWWWWWW r N H U r r WWW NNN N O I> > NvN NNUVNVN Vr VV NOOddd.pydddddppmmmmPOPPydd r 00 rr 00m 00±± NP jyyy P r U A j Z O OdmyPNlWNi+OdPyPN!*:~-Od:O O yP # N:w y Od`p dmj d i : = 1 41 > r 1_ r ! N r. Y ! = 1 > T P M r I O 1 p 1 y~ NWNNP? Wdy p p~ P ~ O W P ` N OyOIN e. W'!P O ).P O O N O P 1 S r oooi.-~*.ouooooo~uo op~ 0 W 0 0 ~ a c N v. i y OOPIPONOOOVOPPPV OO O O O p m y O J y W OOm wpm!lOm N~-OOr'Ddq+4,O qOO rvY,OPmOVN66mNgOmO GON mPOry.ONr+pJOOmI-M11h .01-rv nYNP+OggOPOyOmqnOpm rv TPP O~+^mmmdr0m100gy ~O-,nnl-mn ~mYrvnPNNmmNmPrv l mPOOnFrm ,y+ ++m v.pNPn.~NmVNm++nm V Zi +q 6¢ + m .r r N .r P m f 3~ u 2 +u,.OrgPOtinmYq.pr mPOnNm+N.p l-gPOVNmlmwFgPO~rNm = 0000000 n.~nnnrr ry .,nn <1 rvrvrvNNNrynNNNNnNNryrvNNrvnNNNryNNNnrvNNNNNNNNNNn U O w w w S d U ` .r .r n. m v n ~-r ~+ p rvYin r. iy vey ¢ WZ¢ C 6 K¢LL' Ri ¢6 = Ufj Y tFO 00 ~ O ~ wWO¢ O r0 NOO p00 W S WW 'Nf¢ u W N aW LLW uWWUWW WWW _ is FyyW °a q n Z O VN~6XC _3__R < yPFN u NV OIUN •,- G~ W •n Z~ 44S11i NUNi\ aw 60 IZUUW.< -DLO d O~N v~imNrZ~O t{ 0>Y N3v'VUZ~ < wf w w .~yJO\O<LL V2 YFi ZOw LLZ<<OLLq vOm 2UiN2~U 2WN v¢ _ Ow~wOp(q .-w NiJ nwpw~+w2lO ZS„ NDU¢¢t iLY~ <J mvLO N(KNUIUv ¢ wi'Wo _ tilt 6V ¢ Lw< Z u,V ^~w ~nr .,im<wi<vrW<vq ZZZZ62FFFwOZJV J[a(Oryy~wwvmryY< YK{wo>n,w <1-vYwOOy=w„L> LZ NRNNw<6w6>6u,L>U WJOMNOm Jry u.NGV,i N <60V U'6 V NFVpWOrww<¢~ Ow Zuv02W Ji](w mZr~N ¢WWNF ¢YN¢NSOnUY06 b~ZJVNOONVOmVONLLNPW~{ R 2 w O v U N • V ~+Z V.~ < < OF r 72 F.a v,U y O T wi-r v r UZ' .. O N V 3 p UZ v0 O Nm2 {~ K 2V Iw-1~ 1 N r+0 Z KoNU< Hr2 ~r ~ ~Z ~ ~~=wU M20N0 w> ¢U {ZiONn W¢ r .2 ONOLU 3 NFwN_ < r LLuO.VO rL.nw f ' 2jO~w r¢~s <NUZNm O~ZV6r0(O Zv OG <.~a,C S xvOZW ~ LOZ UNO iw ai=a~+o ~rwzFpa unFiaWO iu`<zL~. raii o_.W a`b' u ..n x,-<aF ,~ oo -aNaoWZU..<o w as O WwUUNUOrONW( «OVKGL L UN Siyt4L2 Ohwr tw YwH VYiZZrZ~~ 22<RV20 NoU:406NVw{p~Vi<ttwNt v <NK6Y20¢YKU~J_ tO UL ONO~tiLN OwLL020WWwWF<w<~6VWJ 2'1N hY La¢a UNW> q ~« w27,rN`WO YfNV~O W<<~~YN{~OSMwvOOKiwO¢O VV>VUinUVVUU3GLUW3Wp o<WO l000wWwW1-mLLU.~¢wLLVOV2 N Y gPmgmvma'P.iNnOgONrvNNgNPPmmmPPqmlNwNmNrmNq ! 61 gryN ry~ggl.~vOgPq~wFOmFqrynq.,n ryN.~NNOmNON 1 qn .~ .~ nnl. ~Oryvv .1 M '~P/ju,N .fir vJ'wv vr~•-~O y.1 ~~ YYJmN Pm rN PPYpwdJ6PyrJHmr~ImOW•'Pp mrmoj~~rN PNNyPOpJOlrPN~WrprOyPNypNwPPYNyWPPOyWNrr•, If 1< AAAAyAZgM9g9ge00022ArSTTn2irFO An M__H HNx 1 O ~_»_>rm>O>• y Zm»ZS • Omn>nnn> >A• >2 2• Z Zmm10-T[xlm l•Ib yO-Iyynyymn9nna ymp nnMOOKmrO°Sm 1 m P OmmNm~AZOOaTNOAnTAA2mnN~(>Am•A-HFO ~•J[AZ09.2 1 ZN OHHyZ •N CA STrm m20amZ>_ 1 mAAHNNA n>••n x-Ix HOOT 11031 nnNy>alr Hr> Zp220 yf n• On 00 rnaq n2 m3 Z- try y 0 9c crmmnP- zmr:zHS°m m<rao~°y i b nnm2a q~ s•>• NNCpz> venyHr>A•m Nb bcTZ 1 ao~im emyncvHmesmrmrn> n y yr 1 o s oo> orHCrANmNNr xn2o a-yi <iip c x Tpc3N a mro+«qy<n y. mn3>x co nr AmSm soeoxn n <ai" qa i•A.H N gm1i1 sc ~ nHr"'mm A y pOyaH„ > m~G; Om}93Nn N F mKIZi O ONnO-°iA p zon n r gyro o n p n z yzan i znTy m aA AI•~ n b x> -loo N 00 > bAxy • n aO 9 2 n>V Yn O rNF A nP2 A N N 3 Oro t > •y'•n m 3 NOr ~nZ n2n n 1 ~n z N 2N nnn nym • Zn • n • y yA II amaAy>TTmCmOTSYYO2CmrA0»A~Sy n n9n> mC0 n»>AS2 m ZyOZHrA93pagHONry9mTn0 < 9N y••NnNO 2 aAN 1 n~ f2 <OmH <- 212MOrNCA401a12 Htr•ym y m(a ~. «'0 I y „m y'YiHNmpn yo n nTVmnZ >x i nnHA n C »9<AOTnN fmar° YT>N Nmn P ;m NmrPgmmyNCT~„TO >xn >yZ>pO OZONy m3 S OYrA> xM <Nam9q% m< ~ <><nAT]O Yp 1 2T nPnm y->Z»yyyr\> >3 m.y= >Z>O>m<) Im g>m+Za en2 >vp Tnz z•j f~~ N mGyAmrT mG>rNn~N OSni Snti00H mmT~ onnAm IN AN 9nZm~m q2 mmT S Fmm oyn TrZt\10 IR 2 n9Z O H>pf n A G X IA SIn p OmN >W N mmn 1 yOa >OfNNN „ 1 MmM r ~~LTi +o ~ ay > > xti gx9mwx Namo N ml"a > i~~n ~q N>rm >y>~ v y i n s im yN > G> i i i nsnni 1 x ~ ~i 8 w~wyy m > ~ oypn imYON + ~~ In-« n zT i pa -IA IRI O C= O q nTl•1nNni nnnnm~ P1 P1NP PI yT n t•1 A aN nn fl °ZyOC°O yOP ym yOp y wa O O^ Z 00 p 1 y zZxTO TmTpT~ Yn fl T a AAmA AAA-IA AzZ A a A Az A A 0 0 _ m_T_'_ TyyNy Z y 1 Y S 33 7 33 O N wN ... NNN N NN N N N NN N nn NNVNNUNNNNNNNNNVVNNNNNNNNNUNNNNNUNNNVNVV Il fl WWWWWWWWWWWWWwWWWWWWWWwWWWWWWwWWW > 0•pmPm"1•I ~IY./y y~YJPPPPpPPPPPPPNywi ~M VWIN PNJTJwJJ IA wWNrOdm-IPPJWNrOdPyPPJwNYOdmyPNJWNYOdmyPanJ 11 2 P > 11 1> 9 d ~A Y IA rJNWJWNP mOYr NP PNPN NONNrrJr m JWnPYrPOPddrYyUrr-Iy PPYOWPYOdP -IP JJYmPN 13 •INNrJW000PNWOJONyyNONOryOdPyPPOPOdNOPP ;y w NIVWJPJVOPPpOPOrJ400WJpOOWPYWy00VPOpYmPPr 1• OmYNrPyOPPrPPW4P•I000.4P YOOPOJOPOPOOOOJdPNp I 8 n.pmOgwOmmCf OpnpPmPOOwNOPm NOaPO.pONf NNPmmO•~nOmq O f mOaPY m w Z i mN.r m mN m m I- .~-~ N Z •1 qPpp mYWan mPO•'~NmfmangPpnNmr _ ¢1 gPPPPPPmPPPOOpOO~Op00•~m non .~ ji rvrvNNNNrvNrvrvNrvNNNrv nfrNNrvrvNNrvrvNNrvNN V __N_C _ Y r J V ri iy ran r ti ~-r V ¢ w¢¢¢¢¢¢6m ¢ _____ _ < 2ti2 ~ U IOO Oo s J Jon o n 00 O 2 WVWVVw1m Uti SVw 2 < Z lW Ono _ 2 ¢V ¢ ayn w WJm p,n O VL~WF Z~yfj <ZpN~wmm~WtMRJ po¢ ~->¢wN¢Lww u>NwrP Y¢ NJ6p<P Ui ~n„ NLFZ~ S V Up d m 7 H~ oZ ~: +e.4N°i zoo ~rcG..NYZi o.zv io W3YN2VJZ Yin wKNm'n JL w'V6Z<n Li h0<l<ZJn¢ <UOONO UOV II<-zOSw< p¢mmm',=PnZN oV~ L60~CniZwwwwZwrr LSOO+L n6¢Vpp J¢¢L¢u2 RKUin ¢2000Ntm0 wVYOLN6 ¢mmPPwKP¢NYVNnVON6+jmNU~vW~cNVLLL •2 r~oooop<J u VVUVVV6t OOOOOODU m < 00{J V O U Wwwww Y ¢p zs o z zzzz s - iz _N~r _ _ ~ a¢¢¢a¢az zp nWZUWU< ~WS of pppppopp p.. u.... ..a LLLp Vn ¢2~J 1 u6t < q<~ i 1 azuz o.J. .m¢ isiiii<s'iNrc n°u ¢ <w2Npj u•p e suuuuuuuuima~o.~W r°a jJW..u Nz i 222iz VUN¢ o •Y Zm< ~ n¢Ov ,",~~i¢a¢aa¢ao~s Yu _ ~zw .<uo <~nVYO p p ¢ZlZV SZit22221~pJOWnOWW v' S6 aNXY ~ nnnYY 2i¢¢V Vn~~JJw wM6nrQYNwO W7JJ~j oJ'J«w2¢wrn ~y2 Z%JNN <_¢JwRw m ¢0000 OOinyp<O¢2<~n it 1y < q YNNNNNNNNNNN NI-mn J>Y 36finC2XXN YI N rvnFnnnnPPNmyNam nf•~n OmmnpmNmNPn ~ N-.-.....-. ~..mmNm-.mNnNmao•+N n.v ~on+ on 1 mmmmmmmmaNmn^mnroga^Nm+mPPmNmm C ~ ~ ~ e 3 w - ~ gi~~ ~ ~~ ~~ _ - rm _ a~g B~ = .. = ae_ _ __.,E9 __~ ~YS i ~ ~~ S ^~' "' A .. ~ - q.°.. - F - Y ^ - - _ ac+ 5o y S fi Y ~ ^ l „ ~ k .°3 ~i - EYX8~ ~ .~ ~~ ~ Y ~ \ ~ __8~__aa= ~ oY 3 ' _ __. ^. P_ # £ b ~.~ ~ ~ .. .. ..32"~SF ~ > .. z \~ l O 1u ~ ~~ .. ~ $ IR S Y X ~. e3=4 °u8.;=~-3v`:i'~~,_0 :.5_ __ >5ou?o :i m _ ' o ~$ +......~~n~...u..aa.-.-. d 8~~~.n-_ms...~_. .~v.: _.. .. ~.°v:nsm `_'° _ m'n a .Ti ' r~ 3 °mm-'i".°.K%°c°-=N-Yip ^58NR2E°S° ='e ••^•x~ $$S S~$EYFY ,,, n.. ,..8:s F33" -g °a 'a ~a-;ry.'esn _ ` u. , . _.: ,E ~ „.=a'yp~:8i: ....;:nin9 °~e°°R°RRgY,RR4RSe F ~ F ^ 6 ' a an_y9_y _ %:.. .€ :%>g~ m €i 3i5~~gR%R¢.n,#~ B ~...^R' ' 6 Z " T . ~r ~ s. a ~ ' aS_8'S° m~ °aa^4SHS 8AG __c:32<=~a~°eE.°%°E.°,Z°v«8`ove°S°Sr.9E °.°«,~aw°.°.° ~8% __ ___e___e_ _ __ ____ _,ogooa mZ 38=98° _ =88888ryc88%8eO88o88...O 8e8888o88888X~w8~888e8~ ~ 38888383888338Se8R8G88888888s'a 33368:3-8's 833's 's - e8a ~%e%98m°9o8a-__veO$ooj_8_ __ ___ _ _ ° 83e8~$o8e88aS`:88%.°°. Sa~OrSo88°o£°'v_P'°-°.Se8°8~~ ,88888388888388888858888888888R88mRY8=888ER88 8%$8%~G8~b'Y$n~%%88~858Gu%X8%8%oN %'%%%%SX8G8%%%'~6 ~88~~dR~K$5~h%°88a6sh~tl~~5%%%S x'~~%8%%•S ~X{%K%K'%~ °~ -~ ~ ~ a.:,.,^u=~yBS=~mmY8-m8:GSZm%~~G$«.S.4m~88uK~zhG~Y« eE o38e8888R98998%~%So8%%%88.°.%09=CS8~8889889 " ' ' ~~ 8$38$_88$%$888pp$8s88u88888e8s88888scs8 s 8 s 8 s 8%S - rT.,.yyp..,. .,oppypypp^pp.. .. ..«..~°e°ese° 88888%88888%88888885888888888888868:8=8888883 F °°°°=8~,vSSG«88w4«««Y«v3Yv98;SS88R888S9$NBES °.°. ~ ~ ~ ` ~ D ~«~. -..='uE' ~"~'=~'..e~e$u~~S~u5a2k. -. 419 .'d~s=-N.p~~.'9~YC-•~3'D WV g~ UUU a.,-._~w..vm%°~~wCYe=L_P'd_.yvYN V.;eCmffi:A.=o.. e ° -~ ue a ~~..a ~.~.. ~. °8 ~' ~~: ~~5 :$ Zo ~~' m~m~ss m.~°~as> - ~.g 8~3~~°h.°8~~ _ m .; :R :. m $°m ,~em$SSEG°um °m Sm.`m° m~mme. m~ ~~m ~iP ° ?°g ego °y ge8e e3o'4° 8" _ .-Pmm.nma ;~..s o.~. mm. mmm .. m. =. X:X~ _ _ -_zR.~ _ ___ . o&~~~K ~8 °fi~R°28~e3F~'a m~wm.8m~mm°w m~ `Y :n Nayy ~^~N _.. .. ..~ b~mYM$xx a,Ef~~~rtW~tiiaa~'LL ~~ 3 ' _ _ _ _ ~.. 6, _ _ c @`a =3 ' ~ i '.' S a S 3 '~. '~ S Y ~ 3 '8'3 "h Em °s~=„ "6.W'~~' 1 5 8 X'. - ______ =~ae_ ____' -_ __'- - _ g ~~ ¢ ~RZ~S4RdAFR~'N":~-:~.&i$E9ei~:.€~DR3~I~A~€~g8£~~8£~AQ ~= Er ;Y ~~ R °' i8 ~ - .n$ 3S~9RRTie..~„a€e o°°aSSE S X°~•gg,~oeH~YF~F 328X' =3<'ZS SDK^~ffi=~~°~., n~~b6m-`~BRN~w~~~~= . ~ aX~„en-A~Bfig~e&~°£a€'9-"R3i~~Q:~FiBS$~~'"e~n^:n^: ~ m ~ ~~'~'n~n~~E:.~''5 ..~d~~'<b'F~~m~~<_r8~~<~~~'~~"K'~SS'6~~1~348.~- ~ ' .«Yeees$«~,3..,°$«YB=Y:=$°«YBY...«««`e«_=.°. «.°,Y««°°-".«S e88be83989839889589989938938388888°98985 ~X 8.°.93 %88F8883338gR883888888~8o88oe38U8888$8vo-_Saoe ' ' ° ~~%%8383 s 8883888888 € s 88888838838388838<38888 _ ___ __ _ _ 93%oQVaaRvQ__ _333x___ _Q's ~'~3s9; !F _- 8838ee=3838 eee88-~ eee8e3~88~~88'38c^'_`88~ 4 333883888883888%88888%88883%%88%R%88888a~%R%8 6 R~hR85fS 8:A%8d8 K'8z'8b.'J.1~XJ~88 ~'88888~8L~~81S5 ~ES~8E e M_ _ ~SCY~R45K ~~~%Au8%388a ox~w88~%58~8$3~~~~x~`~5583~ Y~ m°~~Ae`~_'S~°=~G°.~~-48=G°~..°4.'~6~~9tls3'.`~'.°.S~~.u.,.m e°.: ~~~a~$E e5' '~ - ~a93as9~9s595s95s99es98s988es9FSS99o9s&faa9s `' ~$~x°~R~~~3$~~~~338~3~8~8~88~%§~88~3R83^;:$$SS . 8888%888388%888:8%88885%%88888%88HS88885~8858 IF «Y«««SSYw3~.-««RY=Rw=.°.9«R°,°, ...««Se39-~°.88Y3888E8 GeX9Z=eY8 O ~Se:~°~BeS~~mw~ - a€2>~uL&N2:ICY"~ E I ~ . . d~ _4ffi8_9 SB4fB89_94lfffi9BSV444S444R@1444A808®49 ,Y .. a...,i~UU.. ~m Nfu~&SCYv~~v~~S=aexmvaaCaY-S ~S ~.,.~Yy ii e$ ~$~ A °F~ ~, ° !S "R€ mU 'zY 13 -m ~ -' A~~~~ ~s~a ~~~~~~~s~~~ == = ssssoe oae e- o s_'s _ ~~ v a s o o°ae o m~sa_ ~a~a s R~~s~m_~a~e ~~~~ e _ - ~~~$ s - ~~s~~ase~~ - - -msn - ~~s~~o ~s~~ 8_~__~~m mssa - _.~ .. - - C 8 'S' ^. 9. '-S, <a ae a mm m o ~ ,. __T„ ., ......, ..... ., ...... s -... ,.... ...... e o~ m 3 .. e m m .. - ~- - - x o&o~ -~- ~38aAa __- _ m Y~ ., _ ~.v__ ., __.._ ~ _ .. ~e .,~~ YY $8858~+~ ' veep, o ~ .1y ~ ~~ 3 ~ ~~~~kAC~B ~~A~ ~4 d~ '~ :5~ z~ p p C".~P . . ~.°S ~_ i3 ° ~ .~aS~'y' Wa'v7iiiXn'c 6 ~. $ ° a iY . '~4a3RK _ .".~~ ."~5 ". 5 X'd~~d"d~%wM6 M~ Y. m. Y g~ ~ - W °%u s - W ~ ~ ~ ~ e_ ,.. ~ - „ ~., _ /~ S k F 3 R b S - - .~ x _ ~ ~: § n~ m - I8~ T~ ~ ! F' =Qx .°S ., m ~Y 'f$ a'1 a e ~ 6' H m ~~ R eb IS ~" S .Y 8 F $ $ IN $'~y ~m- °$ EM I~ ~~c ~~ri ~~~ spa '. ~Y~ Se: g8: 5. X: 4' ~°w: Y' yi ~~ S. ~^ Y ~ $ { y~ e*g ~ 2' YY Y> lY 5 5 S a S ~ ~ _ _ __ __ F - ' -•~'~. "y'u&N k n ~~_ ~pnnR~=mF.. EF~RP€8Sm ~ N ~ _- o°°° ° e e -' '' $ '~ .R . '^^~ A R qR c ~ ---~585YL~ - RP ~ _. ..._ e ~ QY e3 - - 'ffi~8000 '.:~M85~~.°. ~-u ~ _ _ _ _ ~~ ~ ^fi _ _ __ __ ____ ~ m m~mmmm ~..,® m..,mmmmmam~ .., - & 8 8 8 - R CS - - 3 R ~ % - - .~ ~. ~ e ~ n _ s e ma= £ R ~ ~ i e'2 4 - ~# - e0 J' m °' d o ° _ 2 + RT ~ ° e e ee ~~ .. ° ame~ ~m &~ = ' - ~~ ~ - A :i S ^E_ ~~ F~ ^8 m $R §~ _. tt "' 8 3 _ J - & hR X81 ° - ~ - -- ss a ~~~ ~ ~ ~ -g' ~` . c rx ~ u ~ ~ s _ ~ _ ', a~, m m ~ m ~' ti a ~~~ w a! - - ~~~ x ~ti _ xrt- ~ .. mom ~'~ -~ ~i~ _ ~° a =~3K m ~~~~ ~ & X S 7X - a ~'C :o ~.. - ~ _ , - g MKS ~~`dr R^ 5 4 ~ _ ~ n, .~ ~~ C0PY.4.....~,...µ~.. e.,~.,n.~....N.e_~a....._ ttt61G11OM 1Ol A1C0M011C tt9YMt FICBYtYfI I. IYIf(]) OF 4CEN3E(31 fll[ NO. Ta DePwwlwY N AlaAdk Fwrep9 Crowd FFCFIPF NO. 1901 FreeaN , , SavmrFY~Cd11.9l1t W ~~ ~ ~ y~ ,~~~ ~ 1lAZItG I1.11CF COO! Ml TMe wdwi9~wd livebl eF~FrhY 199) OON3TIPFAL. ~ Foww doWl~Fetwe P1110tITF al] + iw~ Mnil ]. NAAIEES) a APIIKANFP7 YOC: 1/1/a9 AIIte/ Yndw Sw. ]YON f7 .YA+1i1821u1TA. 9sew9 ~w OYIw IM:Nw LNE ]. Tr1Elt~ a rtAN3ACElOH IA ree Fle )Tre P ee. 90 9.r ) AeeYel tew `~ 10 4 9eee1 Y11]al c Iltl s 4 New9 d Fnww lNtal IbeN ! laeFen d Wvw-MunM. rod Lwd 3]3.1 9A.ew Fn.. FA cM me LP c.a. CYenN rmu t Iluem .:JneooW Y1F30 9A.i teYae[dle e N INnaiei llmiNl. ). Am haNVn M.iae Slm Typd lima a1 Oee0]eq (. 1 ..v~ ~a:ia+ml GIF GaiNT Yu A A1dFq Add.Ya (A 61FYnnl lEen 3HMeMw mi Eaw1 n..rl nw v. New Fee row bYal awY.Imd d e NIfeIT lo. HYw Fee row AYIeYO eel d Ow ~.iYm d Nw AkYbYlk ~I N.+rete Cana lie w Ntde0w d IM Owww+^i Pe^ Kelby M 1M Ae1 /, 11. Fyldn a "Ff3' mww N bieY 9 w 10 M a. nied.ew dad ,IJI M d.YwYF Iei d Iln epOR.aMn. 11. ApplkeN eMew (el Md a•F wwga enIlFlea M ar.dY NuIS0 •eelew ,.M baw dl Yw OneYkeilae d • RaN«, wN (bl MW M.JI M rielew Fwiw. M w ._. d IM w0'' d du Akda0t FY+empY Cmlhd M. I]. FTATF Of GU14MN Cawry'd !~ taeerLL~ ______.__Oee_.~R____yaa.i,}t_ n.a ar. w wl.., r _n~ .r 4ur~• r.....+..~ .., "r ~. wr. x~ •r .+. _...we.,r .+ ~ rra w w r ..n r w w y e ,r ~ r ...~: m 4 ~r n~ .e.~~~~»~ ...unw M i~ f,{~I,.e nf~'. ! ..~^!`I..+e ~. a .w4an .-~ .e, u~~..i N .M n. W. a ..~+.. Ian ~e r.,,f • . ~ e y IY. w Y~..w w ~. ifF /+N M1 `. ~ .tea wiwr. n W .M owr~ e- 4i-' F~ .~+Mti • eMw... s e le e! n.a~.r M .eN..~ ~ w Iti.4~, le 4 es ..,1.. gYMaM. ~r n.,t~. ,r N +.~.n .w .. n~n:e I'+YIiF w ti one+/. 11. AIRICAM ~ ' SIGN NFIIF ~.__________________________________~. _...__.__._......_________.__.__...._____.____._...._____.. ~~1F0FI1 ~ i~ANf/1lO~ IS. ]SATE OF f.AIIIGtNIA CaINF d______________________________________ Cole __...______________._.__..__ uw ..+n w ..r.. «a. ...~ ~..+..~e rc. s+.. r ., ni w , w r . ~M....w r.. w r ,........ a I.,..c.. ~~. «. v i. 4. e:...~n..w .~.~ .. m can: io 4 +.~wr .~..r ~.. J YeeM W~ .a F n~1w ~ u i4. ..Mnn J.• V. •I~+. n .~..~.~ M YO4ww sy.a w M ~....4 a F...ti, it 4 .~ti w4ww• ~ wwr. wh. ~. +, .r a MM. V. m~ M . ,r w n Me ~.e..n...in... xM ~. ~w Yn nom.. Y 4r . wN a +!~ .ML./n Y eM .w e. n....e~, ~ 4 is ...I.~ ~.. M w. ..~ I..ul~ ~ w Y,4 ~'•++ ~. a.ewr M .sMwa~ 1 e. ~..Me ~ .nM..n .r ,~.~ a. ~y:.~+ ~ e. ,...~ ..a n n,Mih YY.. w er war ^ tfneaelilw d._.._._.._lrod._..__..____...__.___..__..OFlm m________________!)w9lti Ne. ...____.______._.. a M' Ue Nd Mdb MIYw TIW Lies Pa OgFrdEFN UFY UYFt IQ~ AOedYd ^ Fwaael nnkq 1 ^ NO.Oei19~'4 A'..' . , ~ ._____.__.______________________________________COIIlf MAF® ___..__...___._____....__..._._____.__ VIRGINIR ~ RRE w~NEAy cENrE~ no•cnrmar u~ ~~~ Located: 8038 Haven Ave. #A Rancho Cuccmcnga, C.A. Property is currently Zoned GENERAL COMMERCIAL Zoning of adjacent property is: North: Flood Control/Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 17 South: Industrial Specific Plan/Haven Avenue Overlay District east: Terra Vista Planned Community) Community Commercial West: Flood Control/Industrial Specific Plan/ $LL barr.R 17 APN 1077-66~-03 ey: R. Alcorn 4/26/H8 ~~ boo PacK W a z W I N F007HILL 3 L v ~ ..u..w.. M y. w.,.. A¢... rr. a„_M, v.r...w....w._ ANMICATION IW tICONOIEC WWOE IKWf~EI! )s„ 1 ttPE(!) Of lKEN3E151 fllE NO. ~ ie: Operlmem d Akohdkpxtr Cmml ~9ktat~f O fEE NO. a Y 11150 51rwE o4 _.V.:. .....J..Gt SexmuMe, CaIN. 95811 Sao uervaidl:a -nE ~l OEOGFAPNKAL ~wm.o....w.:.ne.r CODE Jh15 iM vnd¢rw•wd hw.by epplk¢ br Dde ga¢nwc dx¢nbd m bMn lyvvd Lmp Pmm~ ], NAME(!1 OF AFNKANT(5) Appli.d und¢r 5x. 1.1011 [Y ~h45 i~dG atU4Ea tAL19UINU, [qv. Elfecnw DMC FR._mr¢ Dme. 1--12 Ll>ft) ], ttPEl51 OF TRANSACLION(!) FEE l~ ! ' Y:daOY. r:AUV..6 3 rs.•nsz r1A.~.E::, rdb 4J4. v0 Remral he .xn _ 4 Namn of tuvlww :ungt DtueY _ S lwaeen o, Eminm-NUmbu a.d Sma _ 7.d iaveo Av. Ciry av1 DP Codt Cwnry 3 I '1 +v RECflPT NO. TOTAL 6. 1E Pnlnicx licenwd, ). M h¢mixc Imdt 9. Mwe you erx bwn crnn¢I¢d d e I¢I¢nT! 10, Mow ym ¢rer vl¢I¢wd emy d en pmdriem d Xw Akehelk E¢v¢re9t Cemml Aa w reavlolkm el rht Drye~mwM Wr~ i, reininE ro dw Ax9 iet I.T E.plgn ¢ "YE!" ¢n+.x b il.~m 9 w 10 an ¢n mrwhmxn .hi¢h Eh¢II t. d¢.mM p¢n d Mi¢ opplirogen. bararal rla6•ann. en. uW .... .¢ . ... yWY!,!Yt Star 1]. AppliceM aprcn (a; ,ha erry me^¢9¢r ¢'¢P'¢Yb in omw4 ikmwd p¢m~ h¢.a dl M¢ ovaEludc¢I e! ¢ N:¢-w, a-d rbl Ihm M will rol •blek w mv.. w pmlX ro M Nd¢I¢d my N Mt proriMmr d Mt Almhdk wremw Camol An. 1]. lTATE of CAUIOMU fwnry N7~ Daw .I,>Pq[XipL7mf )/)1/tE Canna Caa4 .aw .1 r ~/ISx snrwlm. •wwf I• M .wwM.. w¢11.~M, alr .s..xW w u•b Hy •rN.wl•• w In M.xr Itl M n. V .~ n. \n \ M r¢x.w4. ww sw•. v.'d ti mn •wl, .,1 rr M M Maw 1¢I rM M ~s s x.Mwx~ M wr n ice! 4xws M Rn wMr~xY w ~IIwIn' r.nw Y w1rM .yn M ~.I~1 .w NM AN 7MMMn i. nw+h .Mblyn w w~ww .mow L m. ~a~•M . I~ n n MN w nM.f M ,r. ,wrr rNl I.n weed M In w, wW x. xWw YMlwnw luW .X 4 ¢nMmn~ w n P w wen. n.lw.m u Mr..x w I+M wr aM.w .r I..rl.w, IA Aw M wwlw •wlLww ,. r .nM..n F wwn M.W.wr w rln M~ .nn.mI~M1¢'InWln w 11. APPLICANT ! ~~~ ' rr.r _ SIGN NERE h~ . fl -L'ylf ~yl J ~• , . O.~ ~ 1 n Qom{` ! D. D; Jonet, 9eiez 91an lr~t1MNR AMIIGTN)N et TMNNfAOR IS STALE Of CALIFORNIA Cmnry M Dew Wn r.IM1 I br...J~ .w• 4 ~~ mIM wM rr li M n M Irsx••. w w. r•w.+M M1. N mr rwrwr M IwM•r ~.Kr wllls~lw.. M rnlw:M n nx +w1. ~ n ¢MX: I]~ ..w 4 x+Mr ,wYr xrrry. b x.. .x•p.•i IMrwnl An.NM Mr..•f w n.n.yr wr. M wxMnn wtl. Ivrln I.JSU1 wyr xMn A wF a/IrwM r.. V M~ ~n 'r. PI Mr M nw+lw wMLrllw w wwrw1 +tin n •n .Y I..x.h M1 ...max A • 4wr n + IJM ,. warwn w.wn. InM1 •w rlwr nM.n .T nwM•r M ., .IxM X. rw.Ar w¢sW Y MM • M ¢.unmw w w xl^ w e.¢..v nau. rI...Mwr w w ~Mw1 w nMxo rt w•nA,wr ul ..w M x.,.r..rMlsx.n rrr w .IMn.• F MMr M 1 .Mkr w M 14..wr .IM ru ,..Ixrr IYUVry w M www,w,rAwr ''~ IA 4em¢pl of Li¢mwNrl 1). 3iteolvrN9 d lk.nwNN 10. Lkmw NmeMr) f R04-AiLr Anl[ S. tN EeR[pLN t. T_ e, .- aAtgtDr lfwt ad taLtt AtL Irl[ d Iv, Lxogee Q Ill tAeF 91~ato~till~~l1N3 SY Dtnu[d1m I Lb Nd WNq bbr 7AIalYt7 6L~ertmnl Uw GJ[ /~ ... Alro¢n.dl gg~xe~w¢~d...fe 1111~~-1111. ~~00 L ~-1-5"-J$~ ' q nY.. ~ r~ cones fAAneD~ .._. =1 RnwwhMai •7lrOD bka pncle[M. OlRm an 1')•qE IEwvlFe Nw 1O1]07I10t7p6"' nee m ,. ....... t~ s i Z w x J ~9 i ~'j LONGS ma'r' c 1 1 '-q ~ sraeE N L..J Syo~ qL ~'i 4~, __ ~~ ^Y\ 0.~{L 1~ \ \\ \\ ~• s '~-~ ' `>, -- .--~ I MnRrc~r \\,\ ~w ` ~., . ~ I J BASELINE ROAD LONGS DRUG STORES CALIFDRNIA, IHC. Loca v~u: fCVf He1VV,1 HVPnl~l0 Rancho Cucamonga, CA Property is currently Zoned= N£IGH80RHOODPCOMMERCIALMUNITY Zoning of adjacent property is: North: T.V.P.C. Medium Density Residential South: T.V.P.C• Medium Density Residential East: T.V.P.C• Medium Density Residential West: Low Dens3.ty Residential +7 /~ APN 202-801-26/27 By: R. Alcorn 4/26/68 L -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAb10NGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 4, 1988 T0: City Counril and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineer Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel Map 10351, located on the south side of Iron Mountain Court, west of Hermosa Avenue, submitted by Nordic Noods II, Limited, A California Limited Partnership REI'ONENC#TIOp It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 10351 and authorizing the City Clerk to cause same to record. Analysis/Background Parrol Man 10151 vac annrnvnA by fbn Planninn rmm~ieeinn nn lane..... to 1987, for the division of 1.12 acres of land into 2 parcels in the Very Low Development District, located on the south side of Iron Mountain Court, west of Hermosa Avenue. Improvements are to he constructed at the time of building permit issuance. Resp 1 submitted, i r ~, ~~ R~~ Attachments z3 RESOLUTION N0. $ 3 J ~ Jrs A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 10351 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 10351) WHEREAS, 7^_ntative Parcel Map Number 10351, submitted by Nordic Hoods II, Limited, A California Limited Partnership, and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the south side of Iron Mountain Court, west of Hermosa Avenue, being a division of Lot 4 of Tract 12902 ac per plat recorded in Book 207, pages 35 and 36 of Maps, records of San Bernardino County, Statc of California, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and NNEREAS, Parcel Map Number 10351 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel MaD: and NNEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met. NOU, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Calffornia, that said Parcel Map Number 10351 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. ~ i _ - ~_~ a4 H P O~ ~ mpMM . i '' ~ a N ~ PI ACF ,, 5 ~ h~ .w~p.nE~.w. ~ iim.w / "llh _ r !i A C T i ? _ ~ ~. .....,..,e } rover Y Y ~i ;!. 4~ry Oo 'fit W 21 ~33 ' ~ ~ ,a t I ~ NO. ~ Z 9 02 ~~ .. 6.~:.~s..~...i xem i .__. .- _ _......J V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA a5 ENGIIJEEAINC~ DM~ION N rr~r: ~~ PARCEL MAP 10351 ~l'!~ ---- CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 4, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Oiliiland, Public Morks Inspect r~"S SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Map 10185, located on the southwest corner of Highland and Milliken Avenues, submitted by The Nilliam Lyon Company RECOMMEN611TION: It is retom~nded that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting tie subJect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor acid City Clerk to sign said agreement. Background/Analysis improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements for Parcel Map 10185 were approved by the City Council on April 16, 1987, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond 5606,000.00 Labor and Material Bond 5303,000.00 The developer, The Nilliam Lyon Company, fs requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectf u itt , /~_ 'T RHM:~ ' Attachments ~b RESOLUTION N0. b D - ~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIq, gPPR0YIN6 IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EICTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MqP 10185 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Caiifornia, has for its consideration an improvement Agreement Extension executed on May 4, 1988, by The William Lyon Company as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way ad,Iacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the southwest corner of Highland and Mi liiken Avenues; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to 6e done in con,iunction with the development of said parcel Map 10185; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and arcompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, BE TT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security 6e and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 1~..~'j- a~ - CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 4, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FHUM: Nussell n. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Puhlic Morks Inspectpr~'-T SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13118, located on the east side of Haven Avenue between Banyan Street and Lemon Avenue, submitted by Paragon Hanes RECOMEIIDMTIGN It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the sub3ect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 13118 were aDProved by the City Council on April 2, 1987, in the following amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: 5800,000 Labor and Material Bond: 5400,000 The developer, Paragon Homes, is requesting approval of a ',2-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respect s bmitted, RH :$MG:dlw ~~ Attachments ag RESOLUTION N0. 8 8 ~ a~7 / A RESOLUTION OF SHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13118 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Lai if ornia, has for its consideration an Improvement agreement Extension Executed on May 4, 1988, by Paragon Nomes as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way ad,~acent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the east side of Haven Avenue between Banyan Street and Lemon Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and sub,~ect to the terms thereof, is to be done in con,~unction with the development of said Tract 13118; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which 1s identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. - 1~ ` a.-9 ntTV nn o w>,.n vn ~a ~n.n~nvn .. STAFF REPORT DATE: May 4, 1988 . T0: City Council and Cf ty Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 8Y: Lfnda BeeK, Engineering Techm ciao ~ SUBJECT: Approval of MaP, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 13476, located on the northeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Tryon Street, submitted by West Venture Development Company RECOMIE11011TI031 It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract 13476, accepting the subJect agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Tract 13476, located on the northeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Tryon Street, in the Low Residential Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on June 10. 1987, for the division of 9.7 acres into 31 lots. The Developer, West Venture Development Company, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: E228,000 Labor and Material Bond: 5114,000 Monumentation Surety: E 4,250 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. Respe y u fitted, ~ .~i c-~_..-"-~~ t,. f.. RHM;i.B: sd Attachments 2 n RESOLUT IGN N0. ~j / ' p~S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL M4P OF TRACT Nu. 13476 WHEREAS. the Tentative Map of Tract No. 13476, consisting of 37 lots, SL'b.T.i tied by least Yerture Oe~elopTent Curany, Subdivider, located on the northeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Tryon Street, has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider for approval by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and MHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Trott said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offertng for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subJect to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. 31 \° IRI"I"I~ I'/~ 1 ~ Y A '~ jl N ri w n » ~ .x ~ C T 1t H p ~ y i i~ ~~. ' ~f xi ~ ~ y s I s ~yyt} n n n ~ i x s IIIE ~ s ~ x r TRV9N tRrRi CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 3 2 ENGBdEERING DIVISION ~" V N ITEId: TRACT 13476 EXHIBI'I~ - CITY OF RANCHO CLCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 4, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Morks Inspecto~~~' SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12938, located on the north side of Highland Avenue east of Milliken Avenue, submitted by Marlborough Development Corporation RECDMENC11TION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the sub,iect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSISlBACKGr.OUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements for Tract 12938 were approved h„ rtio rat„ r„~~o~n ,.,, e,..ti to loan t.. *tio s..n,.Wt.,,. ~ ~.,., Faithful Performance Bond: E139,600 Labor and Material Bond: E 69,800 the developer, Marlborough Development Corporation, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreenent Extension are available in the City C1erk~s Office. Respec bmitted, ~_////y " R :sd Attachments ~T 33 NESOLUTION N0. ~ ~ ~/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCUO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12938 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cai ifornia, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on May 4, 1988, by Marl6ourough Development Corporation as developer, for the improvement oP pu611c right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the north side of Highland Avenue, east of Milliken Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and sub,iect to the terms thereof, is to be done in con,~unction with the development of said Tract 12938; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identlfled in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are he.*eby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ~__- ~ 34 --- CITY OF RANCRO CCCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 4, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer dY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks InspectorC'~-3- SUBJECT: ADDroval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12936, located on the north side of Hfghland Avenue, east of Milliken Avenue, submitted by Marlborough Development Corporation RECOHEN611TION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the sub,lect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. RNALYSIS/BAf,KGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements far Tract 12936 were approved by the City Council an Aorit lfi, tgR7, t~ tfin v„n~~+~, ,.,_~~.,.~• Faithful Performance Bond: 1108,000 Labor and Material Bond: E 54,000 the developer, Marlborough Development Corporation, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respe ' u itted, , ~•~-^ ~ J_, . . '~.. RHM~SMG-sQ"- Attachments RESOLUTION N0. 8 g ~ ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT ExTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12936 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cal ifornla, has fior its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on May 4, 1988, by Marborough Oevelopment Corporation as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the north side of Highland Avenue, east of Milliken 0.venue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said tmprovement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 12936; and WHEREAS, sa?d Improvement Agreement Extension Ts secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW> THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security he and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the Cfty Clerk to attest thereto. ~_,~- 3~ --CITY OF RANGHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: May 4, I988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspectos'~'~-~- Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12939, located on the north side of Highland Avenue, east of Milliken Avenue, submitted by Marlborough Development Corporation RECDMIENBATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subJect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security ±o guarantee the corstructior, of the aff-site improvements for Tract 12939 were approved by the City Council on ADri) 16, 1987, in the following amounts. Fai46a~_i n~rs_~~I~uuw Duna; b85, UDD labor and Material Bond; E41,800 The developer, Marlborough Development Corporation, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are avatiable in the City Clerk's Office. Resp y ubmitted, -~r-=--~-~-' RH Attachments r 37 RESOLUTION N0. 8~ ' ~ p A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAkCN0 CUCAMOkGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12939 WHEREAS, the Cfty Council of the City of Ra.^.c.".o Cuca,~onga, fa7ifOrr.i a, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on May 4, 1988, by Marlborough Development Corporation as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adJacent to the real Droperty specifically described therein, and generally located on the north side of Highland Avenue, east of Milliken Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 12939; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement Extensia! and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ` ~ ~ --~ i V nrmv nc n w nin vn rv •n ~ srn vn n STAFF REPORT DATE: May 4, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Workc Inspecterc~~- =a- r; SUBJECT: ADProval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12943, located on the north side of Highland Avenue east of Milliken Avenue, submitted by Marlborough Development Corporation RECOMEND11i10N: It is recamnended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements for Tract 12943 were approved by the City Council on April 16, 1967, in the fallowing amounts. r ai rnful Performance Bond: f109, 000 Labor and Material Bond: f 54,500 the developer, Marlborough Development Corporation, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said Improvement agreement. Copies of Lhe Improvement Agreement Extansian are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respec submitted, 1,~.~-~.__~ RHM: Attachments ~g RESOLUTION N0. ~g ~ ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, APPAOYING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSI OIi AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12943 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agre~se.^.t Extension executed ^n May 4, I9G", by Marborough Development Corporation as developer, for the improvement of public Hght-of-Way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the north side of Highland Avenue east of Milliken Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and su6,ject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 12943; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, Which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayer is hereby authorised to sign said Imprpvaaent Agreement €xtension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ~D --CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~. DATE: May 4, 1988 70: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Michael D. Long, Sr. Public Warks Inspector SUBJEC?: Execute contract for the Archibald Avenue Entry Monuments Improvement Protect awarded to Bopark Enterprises for the amount of 5129,246.00 to be funded frdn Landscape Maintenance DTstrict No. 1, Account No. 40-4130-8767 RECOMMENOATI011: it is recamaended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for the Archibald Avenue Entry Monuments Improvement Pro,~ect, and authorize the Administrative SerWCes Director to expend 5142,200.00, (5129,246,00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Landscape Maintenance District Mo. 1, gccount No. 40-4130-8767 Background/Analysis On April 20, 1988, City Council awarded the subject pro,iect to Bopark Enterprises. Staff has received from RnPar4 rc.o_.;-!;--, r,,,,,,uieu ^*_-^at JCmncnLo, uonas and insurance documents; reviewed them and found them~to be complete and in accordance with the contract proposai. Resp y su6mftted, ~ ~ _ _. RH . cc: Purchasing Revenue gssessment ~~ --CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Oate: May 4, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Dy: John L. Martin. Associate C1v11 Engineer SubJect: Approval and Execution of a Professional Services Agreement with J.F. Davidson and Associates, to prepare Landscape Improvement and Renovation Plans for the east side of Carnelian Street from Yineyard Avenue to Bate Line Road for a fee not W exceed f15,960.00 to be fundea from the Beautification Fund, Account No.21-4647-8046 RECOMNEMOIITION: Approval and Execution of a Professional Services Agreement with J.F. Davidson and Associates, W prepare Landscape Renovation Plans for the east side of Carnelian Street from Vineyard Avenue to Base Line Road for a fee not to exceed 515,960.00 to be funded from Lhe Beautification Fund, Account No. 21-4647-8046 along with an additional 10X contingency allowance to be established for use under the approval of the Ctty Engineer. BIICK6ROUID/AMIILYSIS: The present landscape and irrigation systems on Carnelian Street do not blend between residential and commercial uses and have several voids as respecting City or developer lnstatlatiors and maintenance responsibilities along with various deteriorating improvements. This area has been a concern for upgrading, retrofitting and reconstruction of unsightly or damaged portions after several improvement failures due to outdated concepts, deterioration and wind damage. The intent is to bring the entire area into conformance with current City standards for landscape, hardscape and irrtgation. There after to include the ma,tority of the area in the ongoing Ctty maintenance activities. Respe~}-}~ submitted, C /~~. ~_~ RH •JLM: a ~~ Attachment y~ RESOLUTION N0. ~ ~ ~ ~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDN611 TO ANARD AND EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES A6REElENT KITH J.F. DAVIOSON AND ASSOCIATES OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA TO PREPARE PUNS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE FOR CARNELIAN STREET LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT AND RENOVATION BETNEEN VINEYARD AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD HN.EREAS, t`.e City of Rancho Cucavange desires to ivprore Carnelian Street as a secondary size north-south thoroughfare between Vineyard Avenue and Base Line Road, and as a consequence sent out Request for Proposals to several engineering corpanies to design such pro,~ect for construction; and NHEREAS, the fine of J. F. Davidson and Associates, has represented as qualified to perforw the services in the Request for Proposal and was chosen by the City Engineering Staff td provide professional engineering services for field surveys, engineering design, studies and calculations for the preparation of plans, specifications and estivate for Carnelian Street Ivprovevent and Renovation Pro,~ect. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucavonga does hereby resolve to award and execute a Professional Services Agreevent with J. F. Davidson and Associates fu provide professional engineering services to prepare plans, specifications and estivate for Carnelian Street Ivprovevent and Renovation Project between Vineyard Avenue and Base Line Road. Such work shall be perfaewed for a fee not to exceed =15,960.00 to be funded by Beautiflcatlon Fund, Account No. 21- 4647-8646. A contln~ency fund in an avount of lOS of thw rnMra~. +_...-.~.t """ also ~ eaiaui~srlea ror use under the approval and direction of the City Engineer for extra work or Change Order during the course of pian preparation. ~T/ ----- C[T]' OF RANCHO CtiCAilIOtiGA STAFF REPORT Date: May 4, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager ~ From: Russeii H. Maguire, City Engineer 8Y: John L. Martin, Asseciare rt v'1 Eny nest i Subject: Approval of Agreement for Acquisition of Easement and Installation of Public Improvement between Donald G. Evens ~ and Miki E. Ewens, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for i Street Frontage Improvements at %11 Hillside Road, located between Malachite Avenue and Archibald Avenue. RECOMMEMDATI011: Staff recommends the adoption of the attached Resolution approving the Acquisition of Easement and installation of Public Improvements batween Donald 6. Evens and Miki E. Evens, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for street frontage improvements at %11 Hillside Road, 1n conjunction with the Hillside Road Stores Drain and Street Improvement Protect between Malachite Avenue and Archbald Avenue. In addition to exchange of standard street improvements for right-of-way, the City shall pay the Owner a sun of 520,060.00 as Dosed on appraisal report, in consideration for the removal of water reservoir within Lhe ultimate street right-of- way. Such amount shall be paid from the Systems Development Fund, arrm mf 4n e0_A Le"I o~~e BACKGRODID)/AM'ILL TS IS Previous action before the City Council on October 21, 1987, Resolution No. 87-579, adopted and approved the Eminent Damatn Action to acquire public right-of-way at 9611 Hillside Road, APN 1061-571-01 for the construction of stores drain and street improvements was Initiated. Although implementation of the Improvement Act of 1911 has taken place, negotiations to acquire such right-of-way continued to avoid further delays in constructing such improvements currently an hold due to missing right-of-way. A tentative agreement was then reached after further negotiations to pay the i,rnM r< ties annna:oeA _ .-~ -e existing water reservolr~within~the proposed rightrof-wayr~Thls action serves the City as welt as the owner in that the City will not have the liability of constructing an open concrete water reservoir on private property and the owner can more easily determine size, shape and location. In addition, the City shall construct all necessary improvements to compiete the roadway widening and stone drain construction. yy CCSR May 4, 1988 Pagae Z The signing of the Agreeaent will sake the right-of-way condennatlon no longer required and the previous order to construct and related court filings shall autocratically cease. Respectf subcritted, ~~ RH •6VA: Attachav!nt ys RESOLUTION N0. ~ ~ - a~3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR ACWISIt10N OF EASEMENT AND INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROYEIENT FROM DONALD 6. EVENS AND MIKI E. EVENS, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TD SIGN STYE MIEREAS, the City Council of the CSty of Rancho Cucawonga has estabiished requirements for construction of frontage improvements 1n a.awlnner that shall be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private inlury; and MHEREAS, the widening of existing roadway section and installation of curb, gutter, drive approach, sidewalk, street lights and street pavement located at 9611 Hillside Road> shall be wade a part of the Hillside Road Storm Drain and Street Improreamnts; NHEREAS, Donald 6. Evens and M1ki E. Evens have agreed to dedicate right-of-way as a reis~hurseeeni to the City for sold i~prorea~ents and in addition thereto, City shad pay the appraisal raiue of ;20,000.00 to the owners in consideration for the removal of existing reservoir as replacealent cost. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the city of Rancho Cucamonga, Caitforrtta, does resolve as follows: 1. Accept the agreement for acquisition of easement and lnersllaH nn of ....nl~. ~~~-.. __t. 2. City shall pay the Ewen's the total sue of 520,000.00 for the replacement cost of water reservoir to be removed. 3. The implementation of right-of-way condemnation per Resolution No. 87-579 dated October f21, 1987, shall cease and no Longer in effect; Council authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to sign sage, and dtrocts the City Clerk to record same in the Office of tae County Recorder of San Bernardino, California. L~- / `P - CITY OF kANCHO CLCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DALE: May 4, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russeil H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Joel R. .azc, r~icr C..,. Er~gioeer m r„ ~l SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Etiwanda Storm Drain System Line 2-1, phase I Improvement Project, located west of I-15, north of Victoria Street from the Victoria Basin to north of Highland Avenue and future Route 30 Freeway, to be funded from Drainage Fund Account No. 19-4fi37-8154 RECOMIENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the Etiwanda Storm Drain Systen Line 2-1, Phase I Improvement Project, located west of I-15, north of Victoria Street from the Vittoria Basin to north of Highland Avenue and future Route 30 Freesway, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clark to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." on~kyruwrujHnaiysis The subject project plans and specifications have been completed by Associated Engineers, reviewed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for constructfon is E593,000.00. Legal advertising is scheduled for May 8 and May 15, 1488, with the hid opening at 10:15 A.M., FriCay, May 20, 1988. Respectf submitted, e ~"_`'_~ RHM• A ttd Ginnent cc: Purchasing 7 / RESOLUTION N0. Y. [~ 1 /~n~ R RESGLUTI ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVSNG PIANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "ETIWANDA STORM DRAIN SYSTEM LINE 2-1, PHASE I", LOCATED WEST OF I-15, NORTH OF VICTORIA STREET FROM THE VICTORIA BASIN TO NORTH OF HIGHLAND AV'eNUE AND FUTURE ROUTE 30 FREEWAY, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AHD DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO 40VERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NUW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Etiwanda Storm Drain System Line 2-1, Phase I". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and f+gures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this ratire, NOTICE 1S HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 10;15 o'clock A.M. on the 20th day of May 1988, sealed bids or proposals far the "Etiwanda Storm Orain System Line 2-1, Phase I" in said City, Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of Etiwanda Storm Drain Sytstem Line 2-1, Phase [". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles I and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. in that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per dian wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the Lity of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, RESOLUTION PAGE 2 Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, Cal ifor•nia, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the Job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as pensalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollare (525.00) far each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing •~te of wages hereinbefcre stipulated for any work done under Lire attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Cade as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777,6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any aPprenticeabie occupation to apply to the Joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works protect and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade 'or a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to Journeymen that will be used Tn the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to Journeymen in such cases chat? nnr ~< less Shan one co n ve except: A. Nhen unemployment in the area of coverage by the Joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. Nhen the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered dppentiC05 on all of his rnnrrarre Q!: an aRRnai Ly er die Of riDt teSS Than one apprentice to eight Journeymen. - The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or Journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. f9 RESOLUTION PAGE 3 The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1717.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Adninistrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (~) hours of tabor shaii constitute a iegai aay's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rmicho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (83 hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective Da.^gaining agreewents filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1713.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check. certif leA check, or oiaaer~s Dona, payaD ~e to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (1GX) of the amount of said bfd as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall he applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder, The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100X) of the contract orice thereof; anA an adntt;onal bond i vaunt z~ual to fif tv Oeri:ent (50X) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to he done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contrctor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Ranrho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. s~ RESOLUTIQN PAGE 4 No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (Generai Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 1000 et, seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time time this contract is awarded. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of 530.00, said 630.00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable Dayment of 515.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done 6y the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld toerfnrmanro rpra~+~„~~ The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this _ day of 19 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this ~ day of 19^ ayor AIIE~I: ,ty er RDVERTISE ON: ~L".Y 8, 1988 MAY 15, 1988 - CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 4, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer ~ d9: Joel R. Lazo, Junior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Hillside Road Storm Orain and Street Improvement Project, located from Malachite Avenue to Archibald Avenue, to be funded from System Deveiopment Furtd, Account No. 22-4637-8748 RECOMI1E11011TIp1: It is recommended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the Hillside Road Storm Drain and Street Improvement Project, located from Malachite Avenue to Archibald Avenue, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Rid<~" Background/Analysts The subJect project plans and specifications have been completed by Associated Engineers, reviewed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction is E383, 000.00. Legal advertising fs scheduled for May 9 and May 16, 1988, with the bid opening at 10;45 A.M., Friday, May 20, 1988. Respec u11 fitted, ~ ~~-_ RHM:JRL:sd Attachment cc; Purchasing sa RESOLUTION N0. $~ ~ ~~aJ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "HILLSIDE ROAD STORM DRAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENT", LOCATED FROM MALACHITE AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has orepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THcREFORE, BE 2T RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Hillside Road Storm Drain and Street improvement". DE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTIf.E INVITING SEA!ED BIOS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant Lo a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice. N0T1r.F IC NFnFAv bIYGN rnat me Baia City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 10:45 o'clock A.M. on the 20th day of May 1988, sealed bids or proposals for the "Hillside Road Storm Drain and Street Ir~rovemen t" in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91130. Bids must 6e made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of Hillside Road Storm Drain and Street Improvement". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the DrDYlslnn5 Of fal ifnr ni,a lahnr !`~Ae DiViSiDn 2. part i. ChaoteP 1. Ar4 it iec i and 2, the contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, S3 RESOLUTION PAGE 2 Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request, The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the Job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore ;tipuiated for any work done under the attacnea contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777,5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, anA in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Cauncfl, properly ir'_entured apprentices may be employed in the Drosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777,5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Cede concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under ht m. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the Joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works protect and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval~.~ The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to Journeymen that will he used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to Journeymen in such cases shall not ue ie;s ciian one to rive except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the Joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. Mhen the trade can shave that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered dppent ices on all of hic rnnf ra{fe or e„ an.^.~31 Lv.ragc of mat icii than one apprentice to eight Journeymenn The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or Journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. S~ RESOLUTIOR PAGE 3 The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1177.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to aDPrenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch o~fices. Eiyht (8) hours of labor shah constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contr?ct and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. the Contractor shall forfeit, as a Denalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (f25.00) for each laborer, wcrkman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to laDOr more than eight (8f hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are derived in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his orooosal cash. sachsor'c rhoro- rerfifiaw check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10X) of the amount of said hid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of P.anchc Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall he returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to he given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100X) of the contract nr;ra the.eof and an ad^iti cral bond it ar. arouY equal to €';ftv nRr rani (50X) of the contract price for said work shall De given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance cf the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contrctnr will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. SS RESOLUTION PAGE 4 No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time time this contract is awarded. The work fs to be done in accordance with Lhe profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of f30.00, said f30.00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursabie Dayment of f15.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions. as set forth in the Plans and Spetifications regarding the work contracted~to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities 1n lieu of monies withheld (performance retnntinnl The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to re.i ect any and all kids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this ^ day of 19 PASSED RND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cai iforni a, th15 _ day of 19_ ATTES: ty er ADVERTISE ON: MAY 9, 1988 MAY 16, 1988 ~~ rimy nc o n wrr on rt it n urnw~c n STAFF REPORT _'~ DATE: May 4, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer eY: Joal R. Laze, Junior Civil 'cnyi neer ~ SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Archibaid Avenue Sidewalks, Phase II Improvement Protect, located from Foothill Boulevard to 6th Street, to be t'unded from SBA 325/T0A Art. 3 Funds, Account No. 12-4631-8605 RECOMlENCATION: It is recanmended that City Council approve plans and speNfications for the Archibald Avenue Sidewalks, Phase II Improvement Project, located from Foothill Boulevard to 6th Street, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." Background/Analysis ine suoJ ect pro,7ect plans ana specit ications nave Deen completed and reviewed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction is (38,700.00. Legal advertising is scheduled for May 9 and May 16, 1988, wfth the bid opening at 10:00 A.M., Friday, May 20, 1988. Respec 1 bmitted, NM;,IBYSC~ Attachment cc: Purchasing 57 RESOWTION N0.88~ eNr A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS ANO SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "ARCHIBALD AVENUE SI DEW.4LK5, PHASE II", LOCATED FROM FOOTHILL BOULEVARD TO 6TH STREET, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND OI RECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. 'WHE"nEAS, it ie Lhe intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHERERS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NON, THEREr'ORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Archibald Avenue Sidewalks, Phase II". BE [T FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SE.4!EO BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this ratite. NOTICE IS HEREBY sluts that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 10;00 o'clock A.M. on the 20th day of May 1988, sealed bids or proposals for the "Archibald Avenue Sidewalks, Phase I[" in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read imnedi ately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form Drovided far the purpose, addrESSed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of Archibald Avenue Sidewalks, Phase II". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2; the CnntraCrnr is r=quires re pay ^ot less that the general Dreval Y nc rate of Der tli an wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are avafla6le to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such dot erminati ores to be posted at the job site. S~ RESOLUTION PAGE 2 The Contractor shall forfeit, as pensalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollare (E25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. I.^. ccer dance with the - prcvisicr~s Sdti vii 1777.5 of iite Labor Cade as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor emgloytng tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the Joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works protect and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. Tha certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to Journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract, The ratio of apprentices to Journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: .4. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the Joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior Lu iiie reyues~ iur cerc m case, or 8. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship 4raining on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered appentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one appren~ice to eight Journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the adninist ration Of apprenticeship oroarams if he emptnyc rngi 5t opnd apprentices or Juurricyrnen in any apprenti ceab ie trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777,6 in the employment of apprentices. R ESOLUT[ON PAGE 3 Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or Iran the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day`s work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of fal ifnrni3 having to do with working hour: 35 sat forth ?^ Oiv isiar, 2, Par4 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8f hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required 6y this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payabie to the City of Rancho Cucamonga far an amount equal to at least ten percent (10X) of the amount of said 61d as a guarantee that the b?dder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded ~, auu in ereui. ui iaiiure Cu enter in iu suci, cun[r act rata cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall became the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the ammmt of the lowest bidder's security shall 6e applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (50X) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to 6e done by the Contractor, or anv work or labor of anv kind .,."_""_ d^a° ~ N~~, and the Coatrctur wiii aiso be required to furnish a certtficate that hemcarries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal wfll be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ~~ RESOLUTION PAGE 4 Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time time this contract is awarded. The work is to be done in accordance with the Drofiles, plans, anA specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clark at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucaronga, Cai iforni a. Copies of the plans and specifications will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of 530.00, said S30.OD is ranrefundab le. Upon written reques4 by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be marled when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursabie payment of t15.OD to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will b= required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of tYs General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cast and expense, substitute authorized securities Tn lieu of monies withheld {performance reten*.ien). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bads. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this _ day of 19 PASSED An0 ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this day of 19_ ayor ATTEST: i y er ADVERTISE ON: MAY 9, 1988 MVY 16, 1988 6/ - CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 4, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer B'i: Michael D. long, Senior Pub iic works inspector SUBJECT; Authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Sapphire Equestrian Trail Reconstruction Improvement Protect, located, south of Banyan Street, to be funded from Beautification funds, Account No. 21-4647-8723 RELOI~ENOIITION: It is recommended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the Sapphire Equestrian Trail Reconstruction Improvement Protect and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." Background/Analysis The subtect protect plans and specifications have been cangileted by J. F. Davidson Associates, reviewed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. Ine Engineer's estimate for construction is jbL,WU.W. Legal advertising is scheduled for May 10 and May 17, 1986, with the bid opening at 3:00 p. m. Friday, May 19, 1988. Respec ri u fitted, RH :dlw Attachment cc; Purchasing 6a RESOLUTION N0. R 6 " f7~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "SAPPHIRE EQUESTRIAN TRAIL RECONSTRUCTION", IN SAID CITY RNO AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. HHE.°,EAa, it ;5 the i;te~tiLn o` the City Of RafiihG CuCa,TiGfiga tG CunSt!'uCi certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of cet•tain improvements. HON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and spcif ications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Sapphire Equestrian Trail Reconstruct ton". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall 6e substantially fn the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, Cal ifornfa, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY G.: Lii :~~"L Gig >uid Cily ui namiiu i,ucmnunya wiii receive as the urT ice or the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 3:00 o'clock P.M. on the 19th day of May 14B8, sealed bids or proposals for the "Sapphire Equestrian Tratl Reconstruction" in said City. Bids will be opened and Dub1 icly read imnedi ate ly in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must 6e made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of Sapphire Equestrian Trail Reconstruction". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 1, Chapter 1, Articles and 2, the Contractor is required to Dav not less than the general orevailina ..., cf per 'ia~ wages for work of a similar character in the iocaiity in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies cf such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on ft le in the l3 office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as ppeas alty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollare (E25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate cf wages bereinbefore stipulated for and work dc~e under the attached contract, 6y him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with, the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and to accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may De employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any upprenticeahle occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not ue ieaa limn one iu rive except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage 6y the joint apprenticeship comni ttee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices 1n training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. Mhen the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered appentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less .,.. ~n air eria ap'yr Brit iCe to ei yht juurneymeri. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public vrorks site are making such contributions. S° T The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1177.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of ApDrenti ceship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8} hours of labor shall constitute a legal days work for all ~arur~en employed in the execution of thi; contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do wit~n working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended, The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer workman, or mechanic is required or perms tted to labor more than eight f8f hours in violation of said Labor Cole. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the aDPlicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submi4 wtth his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to ac least ten percent (iuij or one amount or sale oia as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awardel to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers check, certif ted check, or bond shall became the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the nett lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the law bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder, The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract far said work shall be one hundred percent (100X) of the eontract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (50X) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the oavment of claims for any maieria is or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, acid the Contrctor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. ~~ No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal forrt~ has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contracter's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time time this contract is awarded. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, pians, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of 530.00, said (30.00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of 115.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Previsions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done Dy the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (perforn~ance retention). The C1Cy of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to rel ect any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this _ day of 19 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this day of 19_ AITEST: ty er Advertise: May 10, 1988 May 17, 1988 rP }o /TTTV ilT Tl /. AtI+T T/1 l~TiM1 11T/~Tt/+ I STAFF REPQRT DATE: May 9, 1988 O G~,~, VNC ~`Z" ) 9 f e x~ ~~ F~! ~ it -=i9;~ ~ i TO: Mayor and Members of the, City Council FROM: Jack Gam. AICP, Community Development Uirnetor RY: Linda D. Daniels. Senior Redevelopment Analyst SURD F,CT: APPROtiAh OF CONS L'L TANT COYTRACTB FOR PROPOSfD SALE OF CERTIFI ('A TES OF PARTICIPATION FOR THE FINANCING OF FIRE PROTECTION FACILITIES RF. ,,^,OMM F.NDATION: Approve the consultant contracts for Stone and Youngberg lunderwritcr 1. Fieldman and Rolapp (i'inancial cnnsultantl, and Jones Hall Hill and White (bond counsel) in cnnneotion with the structure azld sal r, of Certificates of Parti r,ipetion for the financing of fire protection faciliCies. BACKOP.OCND: On April 6, 1988 the City Councfl and Redevelopment Agency reviewed an outline of a proposed bond stru r,ture for financing fire protection faoili ties within Lbo Lily. both 2ne Council antl the Agr.ncy authorized staff Yo proceed with developing [he structure and to prepare Cinal bonds documents for the sale of Certificates of Pan~i. A?'ALYSiS: In order to pr e.pare and structure su r,h a bond issue, it is necessary [e have the support services of an underwriter, financial consultant, one bond counsel. These servi r,es are typicnl to any pond issue sold. S7.nnn and Youngber P, is the proposed underwriter for the Certifl rate of Participation. This firm has provided underwriting services to the C.Sty and the Redevelopment Agency an many issues in the past and have been very prnfassional in obtaining the bast structure for Che varloua public projects. The underwriters roll in this issue would be to formulate the finnnr, ial structure, assist in presenting the issue to insurnnoe r.nmpan.i es and rating iii r. 1'.l ri tl ll __.. th.. .. .. ... .. .r ~. rr +r ur„~uir~ vie r. t' t11C i ssne fs readY far~se le~ r inldmnn and Rolapp is the proposed finan r.ial consultant fur the proposed bond issue. The financial consultants role is t.o insure that the City's interests are being met as wall as to negntia to the purchase price for the bonds with the underwriter. The firm of Jones Nall Nill and White is the recommended hoods counsel for the issue. This Dond counsel firm has provided services to the Agency and the City in the past and has worked well in preparing documents which meet the goals oI the issue. The role of the Dond counsel firm 3s to prepare all necessary legal documents and to issue a legal ooinion as to the tax exempt status of the Donds This firms legal opinion is highly respected in the bond and financing industry. All of the costs for the special consultants are pafd from the bond issue. No expenditure from general fund revenues 1s required. Attached to this report. ere copies of the contracts from each consultant which outlines the services to be provided and the fee. Staff has reviewed the prop owed fees for the consultants and finds that they are appropriate for the proposed bond sale. Respectfully submitted, °° Jack Lam, ~A iCP Community Development Director Y V ~~~~ STONE 8z YOUNGBERG NENBEBB: YaCInC STOtk E%CNaNGE UNDERWRITING AGREEMENT P.pril 21, 1986 City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C P, 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Lauren Wasserman, City Manager Re: Underwriting Agreement for financing Fire Protection Facilities through Cer tiflcates of Party cipation (COPS) in a Lease-Purchase Agreement between the Ctty and Redevelopment Agency Oear Honorable Memhers of the Council TMs letter will serve as an agreement between the City of Rancho Cucaeonga (the "City"> and Stone 8 Youngberg ("the Underxri ter") to serve as underwriter to the City until the parties enter into an actual Purchase Contract regarding the negotiated sale of certificates of par tlcipatl on to be authors ved by the C1 t_v (the "Certifica tea"> to finance a Fire Prote[ti on facilities. You have informed us that the City intends to authorize the issuance of the Certificates to provide funds for financing various public improvements and for thts purpose requires the services of the Underwriter to assist in the structuring of the financing and to enter into a Purchase Contract that is agreeable to the City. As underwriter we will use our best efforts to bring the Certificates to market at reasonable rates under then existing conditions. The Underwriter agrees to undertake the below listed services and functions. A. Structuring and Ftnancin The U.^.derxrt«e• x111 ,.to•k xirh the rl ty t^ c•eare me Est feaei ble and efficient structure for marketing the Ce rtiftcates. 2. The Underwriter will work with the C1ty's special counsel, financial advisor, and Ctty staff in recommending specific terms and conditions affecting the Certificates. 3. The Underwriter will prepare the Official Statements (preliminary and float versions, respectively) for sale of the Certificates. The City (P / d/E CALIrORNU STREET • &J1 fAawCI8C0, CALIFORNIA W111 ~ (t16) 9a1•Ia11 City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga April 21, 1988 Page 2 agrees to participate in their preparation by providing pertinent information to be included therein ar~d agrees to review the Offict al Statements for accuracy as they relate to matters concerning the Certificates, the Fire Protectlon Facilities, the Redevelopment Agency, and the City. The Official Statements will include a description of the Certificates and their security and pertinent financial and economic data. The execution and delivery of the Official Statements will be duly authorized by the City for use in marketing the Certificates. If the City so requests, we will assist the City and its financial advisor in the selection of a Trustee. B. Marketi na the Certificates: At the designated time for each sale of the Certifi cntes, the Underwriter will submit an offer to the City to purchase the Certificates by way of a Purchase Contract subject to partinent resolutions, the OffiCi ai Statement, and all other necessary documents, approvals, and proceedings governing such Certificates hav ing been determined by special counsel, the financial advisor, the Redevelopment Agency, the City, and the Underwriter to be ;att;fattory in all respects for ftnanci n5 purposes. It is intended that, once purchased, the Certificates will be re-offered to the pu611c on the basis of an immediate "bona fide Dubl is offering". The Underwriter may form a arouo of Investment banking firms for the purpose of underwriting and selling the Certificates. At least one day prior to the submission of any such formal offer to the City for the purchase of the Cer ttficates, the Underwriter will indicate to the financial advfsor and Clty the interest rate or rates, the purchase price from the City, and public offering price of the Certificates that we then estimate will he included in such offer. If, after negotiations in good faith, the City and the Underwriter fail to agree on the terms of sale of the Certificates, and upon written notice to the Underwriter, the City may then offer the Certificates for sale to others without any further obligation to the Underwriter. r, renu ral Drny i<1Qn< pglatin~ ro the n rv 3Rd the Underyrltor: The City agrees to make available to the Underwriter without cost, sufficient copies of any applicable reports, agreements, contracts, resolutions, and other relevant documents pertaining to the Fire Protectlon Facilities, the City, the Redevelopment Agency or the Certificates as reasonably may be required from time to time for the prompt and efficient performance by the Underwriter of its obligations hereunder. 7~ City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga April 21, 1988 Page 3 2. The Underwriter will pay its own out-of-pocket an6 other expenses, including the cost of Underwriter's Counsel which will be retained by Underwriter, Blue Sky and investment Memorandum and any advertising expenses 1n connection with the public offering of the Certificates. The Underwriter will be reimbursed at cost for ezpenses incurred on behalf of the City and Agency with respect to presentations to rating agencies or insurance companies. 3. The City will pay from the proceeds of the Certificates all costs and expenses customarily paid including the cost of printing the Certificates and the Official Statements, and any other documents, the fees and expenses of its legal counsel, special counsel, financial advl sor, accountants, architects, engineers, rating fees, credit insurance premiums, and costs of any other experts or consultants retained by the City in connection with the financing. 4. It is expressly understood and agreed and the City hereby recognizes that in performing its activities the Underwriter is acting solely on its own behalf and plans to submit to the City a proposal to purchase the Certificates for resale. Nothing herein will be construed to make the Underwriter an employee or financial, fiscal or other advisor of the City, or to esta611 sh any fiduciary relationship between the Ctty and the Underwriter. It is understood and agreed that the City wfii net be required to compensate the Underwriter fur services provided to the C1ty under this agreement if the Certificates are not sold to the Underwriter. 5. Upon termination of this agreement, the City w111 be under no further obligati on to the Underwriter hereunder. Upon your acceptance set forth below, this letter will cons tl to to an agreement between the City and the undersigned. Very truly yours, Accepted this day of CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 8y STONE 6 YOUNGBE/RG ~, ~ _ .-~.` Nm. Thomas Loc~card 1988 l NTL:cn (O110C1 cc: Larry Rolapp, Fteldman, Rol app S Associates -7/ ORIGINAL ~,.w Heldman, Rolapp & P-ssOCiatest ~W INpErfNOfNT PNAKIAL ApVlrpr t0 IOCAI LOHIINMfNT April 23, 1988 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9320 C. Baseline Road Post Office Box 607 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: Linda Daniels Senior Redevelopment AnalYSt RE: Financial Advisory Services FRA Project Na. 1225 Dear Ms. Daniels Pursuant ro your request, Heldman, RoiapD SL Associates is pleased to spbmi[ this letter Agreement to the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City") Cor municipal financial advisory services to be performed sn conjnaction with the lease financing of the fire improvements /Th• "O•n:roN\ W nnA•r"r.nA rbt rA• f:wnn:m_ mitt M errmm~t:"hM mLh rh• n r••A" of Certificates of PertieiDation. We have extensive experience in handling the aforementioned method of financing. We offer to assist you in a financial advisory capacity by utilizing and making available to yeu the research, statistical, and consultant staff oC our organization to such extent as may be necessary and hslpfal. Our services can be divided into Dhasex The first phase would be concerned with the financial planning end all other necessary analyses, public meetings, cooferenees, work sessions, and seminars. The second phase would be concerned with furnishing financial advisory services to be performed in eoejunction with the marketing of the Certificates of Participation. 21m s,E. MAIN STREET SECOND BOOR IRVINE, U 41]11 mgr feo•asm EAx Inq a7aem 7~- SERVICES We agree to provide the following advisory services in comec[ion with aoy and all City financing requirements as thcy pertain to the Project: PHA I. Prelimiauv Serrev. We will confer with your staff, bond counsel, and other i¢teresttd parties for the purDOSe of making a preliminary survey of the Project a¢d to assist in the formulation of a coordinated plea to fi¢aaee the Project. I[. Apgndaace at Peblle Meatless/God We will attend aoy meetings co¢cer¢i¢g the Project when deemed accessary and, in addition, be available to atte¢d meetings sad conferences to exDisin the effects of the proposed fi¢a¢ciag. III. Coaaeltatioe/Adrlee. We will be available for coasultatioa and advice until such time as the Certificate of Participation issued to finance the Project have been sold. IV. Work 5caalou ud Semlaar.- ' We will 6e avaiLAle to ennNmt anA/nr na rNr;oa.r ;n wn.Y . .. unA . _ ,..w_:..r. may be held to discuu the Project and methods of public financing. We will perform the following additional service i¢ cooju¢etioa with the marke!ing of the Certificates of ParticiDatioa. I. Mueicieal Secaritiea hLrket. Furnish the City with information concerning current muaieipel securities market conditions and make reeommevdatio¢s as to the technical details of the financing, including maturity schedules, funds, covenants, redemption featum, and other details which will, in our opinion, make the proposed fi¢aaciag most scceptable to prospective purchasers sad, therefore, marketable at the Icwcst passible iaicrest n:c. Z 73 II. Negotigted Sale. A[ the direction of the City, negotiate a sale of the contemplate6 Certificates of Participation. A. Negotiated Sale. 1. Cowultaflog/Adrlce. Attend any meetings concerning the Project when deemed necessary and, in addition, be available for consultation and advice anti! ..:ch time as the G-rtificates of Paaicipatica to fiaanx :hc improvemend havc been sold. 2. Negotiated Sala of Certificates of Particinatloa. Assist the Ci[y in negotiating the sale of the contemplated Certificates of Participation to the underwriter selected by the City and make aDPropriate recommendations to the City. 3. Finagclal Re.lew of Doegmeats. Review the financial aspects of all documents relating to the marketing of the propoud Certificates of Participation including aey Underwriter Official Statement and Bond Purchase Agreement. 4. Due Dtiigegce Meetlag. if a due diligence meeting is hdd, we will participate in such due diligence meeting and assist the City is the examination of pertinent fioaocial data. 5. Maitlele Saln/Secafitr Re•lew. In the event the authorized Certificates of Participation are sold in more than one sale, we will review the financial terms and conditions of each offering to determine to what extent, if any, the security of each series oC Certifiwtes of Participation is impacted. V Certificates •of'Participatioe are. sold in more than one sale, we will provide services for each cries of Certificates of Participation in accordance with this Agreement. III. $gjjpg. [F deemed desirable, we will work with recognized rating service(s) in ae attempt to obtain ao advaotagwus rating of the Certificate of Participation to be issued. IV. Igsuras.&f. If deemed desirable, we will assist the City in obtaining an insurance policy providing for guaranteed payment of principal and interest on the Certificates of Participation. V. Aifeudaace at Ciwiu. We will compute cloning figures, including accrued interest, and auiat in the coordination of events of the clwing. 3 7~ V1. table or Debt Serrlee. After the Certificates of Participation have been delivered, we will prepare and Curnish the City a Table of Debt Service, which wilt set forth actual semiannual and annual payments of DriaciDal and interest due on the Certificates of Participation. FEES For all services to !fe rendered hereunder rnsulting in the negotiated sale of Certificates of Participatioa, the City will DaY us Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars (57500) for each series of Certificates of Participation. ABANDONMENT [n the event the Project is abandoned prior to the completion of financing, the City agrees to pay us s Cce equal to the rcasooable value of services mndered from the date of this Agreement ro the date of abandonment. Reasonable value for our services shall be determined by using our current hourly rates in effect at the time of such abtndonment, plus reimbursement for usual apd customary ouFOf- pocket expenses. Attached hereto is Schedule "A" of our hourly rates in effect as of the date oC this Agreement. HXPENS63 The City will reimburse ua for ususi and customary out-of-pocket expense:, including, but not Limited to costs incurred in connection with travel outside oC Southern Califoroie, if each travel is accessary ie the furtherance of the Project sad is authoriud Dy the City. to additioe, if it is pouible to obtain a rating on the Certifiate of Participation from Standard d Poor'a Corporation and/nr MnnAv4 In arstn. Srrvir~ anA/nr nthre roNno orvirr »nA/nr :f munirin»I pnnA inav»nrr i• available, the City agrees to pay for the costs of such rating and insurance. PAYMENT Payment for all service rendered and expenses incurred puesuan[ to this Agreement shall be paid at the closing. In the event of abandonment of the Project, abandonment foe shall be due and payable immediately after such abandonment. TERMS This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect until the finaecing contemplated herein has been completed or the Project is abandoned, whichever first occurs. It is ezpzessly understood that this Agreement does not iaiead to and is not under say circumstances to be construed as requiring us to perform any urvicea which constitute the practice of law; we are employed in an expert fieancial advisory capacity only, 7s If the foregoieg Agreement is satisfactory to you, Dlease take aDDroDriate actioe to authorize its acceptaece by sigeiag aed retureieg the origieal copy hereof. Reslxetfully submitted, FIELDhfAN, ROLAPP A ASSOCIATES ~__~~~ c; Lawracc G. Rol:pp President LGR/tlg Attachment ACCEPTANCE Executed oa behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamoega this ~ day of 1988. ey: Title: Date: ATTEST: ey: Title: Bate: 5 7( SCHHDULE "A" EFFHLTIVH OCTOBHB 13.1987 $12S Per Hoar $7S Per Hwr Seeeort/S+eretarlal ctaf( $~S Per Heer AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES (Fire Facilkiea Project) THIS AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES is made and emend imo this day of 1988, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, GAL~FgaN~A rihe "Ghy"), acd JONES HALL HILL & WHITE, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION, San Francisco, California ("Attorneys"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City proposes to finance the acquistion of land, the construction of two fire stations and the acquisition of certain fire apparatus and equipment by entering into such agreements es may be necessary and to authorize the execution, delivery aRd sale of certificates of participation in payments to be made under such agreements (the "Certificatea'~; end WHEREAS, the Cfry has determined that Attorneys are apecialry trained antl experienced to provide services for the finendng end the execution and deivery of the Certificates; and WHEREAS, the public imeres[, economy and general wekere will be served by this , Agreemem for Legal Servit~s; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED, as follows: 1. Duties of Attomevs. Attorneys shall provide legal services in connection whh the authorization, Issuance and consummation of the Tinencing proceedings relating to the Certificates. Such services shell Indude the following: a. Conley and conautt wkh the officers and edminietretlve staff o/ the City as to matters relating to the finendng proceedings; b. Attend ell meetings of the City Coundl end any edministrative meetings at which any finendnq proceedings relating to the Certificates are to be discussed, deemed necessary by Attorneys for the proper planning of the financing proceedings or when apeclfica!ry requested to attend; c. Prepare any required lease agreements, trust agreemema. aesignmem egreemenis, agency agreements, amendments io exiaiing financing dacumema, Indentures, ordinances and ell reaolutione, notices end legal dacumems necessary for the proper conduct of the financing proceedings relating to the Certifcatea; d. Review all financial documeme for legal suttidency; ~o e. Review, without undertaking an independent investigation, any oNicial statement or other disclosure document prepared in connection with the financing proceedings to assure correctness of disclosure relating to the legal documents; f. Prepare and provide a signature and no-litigation certificate, an arbitrage certiNGtte and any and all other closing documents required to accompany delivery of the Certificates; g. Prepare and provide a complete transcript of the conduct of the proceedings necessary to accompany delivery of the Certificates; h. Subject to the completion of proceedings to the satisfaction of Attorneys, provide the legal opinion of Attorneys that the interest due with respect to the Certificates is excludable from gross Income for purposes of federal income taxation and that such interest is exempt from Calitomia personal income taxation; ' i. Subject to the completion of proceedings to the satisfaction of Attorneys, provide the legal opinion of Attorneys approving in all regards the legality of all proceedings relating to the Certificates; end j. Confer end consuh with City officials and agents wfth regard to problems which may edse dodos the servicing and paymem of pdncipal and interest due wilt! respect to the Certificates. 2. Compensation. For the services set forth under Section 1, Attorneys shell be paid the percentage comperreatlon set forth below: a. one percenT p`yo) OT the pnOGp81 BmaUnt OT the Gert111Cates to 8 principal amount of 11,000,000 (wfth a minimum fee of 115,000 in the event of Issuance of a principal amount of lags than 11,000,000), plus; b. One-half percent (1/2%) of the principal amount of 4he Certificates in excess of 11,000,000, but less than or equal to 15,000,000, plus; c. One-quarter percent (1/A%) of the principal amount of the Certificates In excess of 15,000,000, but lase than or equal to 110,000,000, plus; d. One-eighth percent (1/8%) 0/ the principal amount of the CeRHicetea in excess of 110,000,000, but lase than or equal to 120,000,000, plus; e. One-sixteenSth2n percent (1/16%) of the Ddncipel emouM of the vdYiifii~fiea iri exi:eaa of Kv,1lull,NN. In eddkion, Attorneys shell be reimbursed for any teats Pdvenced by Attomeye on behalf of the City, including delivery and mesa-miler aervk~s, closing Coate, dupllCBtion caste, transcdpt binding coals end expenses for travel outside the State of Celflomis, If any, but spsclflG3lry exGuding travel expenses wkhin the State of Calf/omla. -2- 7~ 3. Exceotiorre. Any services rendered in any Ikigation Involving the Cky or the financing proceedings relating to the Certificates are excepted from the services to t1e rendered for the above compensation. For such services which Attorneys are directed to render for and on behalf of the City, compensation shall be on the basis of reasonable fees to be agreed upon by the Cky and Attorneys. 4. Termination of AareemeM. This Agreement far Lsgel Servir~s shall be indefinke as to term but may be terminated et any time by the City, wkh or wkhout cause, upon ninety (fdD) days' written notice to Attorneys. In the evem o1 such termination, ail finished and unfinished documents shall, et the option o1 the City, become ks property and shall be delivered by Attorneys. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the partlea hereto have caused these presents to be executed by their respective ofnceB thereunto duy authorized es of the day and year Tirst above written. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By Cky Manager MIIIgI }~,~ City Clark JONES HALL HILL & WHITE, A Proleeeional Lew Corporation By B D.Ou1M 23174 ^~ V ~' ~~ /(al'M0,2CL.h ~ - .~//'Of'R//IIOTL~ LaMES L MAR.MnN A M1'pREW v nRC 3vN 61(1 Ra LPC r'Ia G EO%ON M A4rMn JO GEIS LER Beverly A. Authelet City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NUMBED ONE CIVIC EE NiER CIRCLE e. o. mx mss BREA~Ca LIeO RNIa H2622-1049 111 A~ 9 T ELEGY ONE 90 3601 x!213', 691' April i2, i5eu Re: Amendment to Agreement 9etween City of Rancho Cucamonga and Recreation Systems, Inc. Dear Beverly: As you will recall, in early 1985, the City and Recreation Systems, Inc. entered into a relationship for purposes of obtaining professional services regarding the planning, design and development of Redhill and Heritage Community Parks. While the projects are essentially complete, .c.o p~eam,~iy nxiai.a aeverni inwsuics arising out or stop notices filed against the prime contractor, Shooter & Butts, as well as a lawsuit pertaining to change order issues arising out of the lighting systems for the said parks. The attorneys for Recreation Systems, T;ic. have brought to our attention a potential problem with the original form of contract between the City and Recreation Systems, Inc, As originally drafted by the former City Attorneys office, the liability provisions thereof appear to be in conflict with the requirements of Recreation Systems, Ine.~s insurance carrier. In order to clarify the issue and insure that no lapse in coverage occurs, we have met with counsel for Recreation Systems, Inc. and have drafted the attached Amendment to the contract. We believe that the Amendment adequately preserves Y.he interests of all parties and, accordingly, recommend that the matter be presented to the City Council for its consideration at its meeting of May 4, 1988. We are enclosing a copy of the subject Agreement, together with all exhibits, for your use in preparing the Council agenda. a/ Beverly A. Authelet April 22, 1988 Page Two We have forwarded two duplicate original copies of the Agreement to Recreation Systems, Inc. in order that they may execute the copies and return the originals directly to your office for final processing. Accordingly, we would appreciate your placing the matter on the May 4, 1988 Council agenda, as a Consent Matter item, and providing the City Council this correspondence as our recommendation to the City Council to approvE the subject Amendment. Should you have any questions or require further information regarding the matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office at your convenience. Very t/~G" Andrew V. Arczynski Assistant City Attorney City of Rancho Cucamonga AVA:pmm \S\131\LAUTMLET\R.0. 2.4B 0 This Amendment to Agreement is made and entered into this 4th day of May, 1988 by and between RECREATION SYSTEMS, rNn, _ n~itfcrnia _ _r^~atie~ ("rnygrrr Tn~ymn en._weti._neg hereinafter) and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a Municipal corporation ("CITY^ sometimes hereinafter). A. Recitals. (i) Heretofore, CITY and CONSULTANT entered into an Agreement for the provision of professional services concerning the design, planning, bidding and constructien of Heritage Community Park and Redhill Community Park in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (ii) Said Agreement is evidenced by that certain dated Sanuary 9, 1985 and executed by CITY on January 16, 1985, and that certain Agreement executed by CONSULTANT on April 2, 1985 consisting of four. (4) pages full, true and correct copies of each of which are attached hereto. (iii) The parties hereto desire to ratify and amend said Agreement to insure continued indemnity and insurance coverage. (iv) All legal prerequisites to this Amendment have occurred. 1 ~3 ~ Aoreement. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. In all respects as set for the in the Recitals, Part A hereof. 2. CITY and CONSULTANT hereby ratify and reaffirm the Agreement and further agree that the Agreement between the parties shall consist of the Agreement and proposal described above, a copy of each of which is attached hereto, and this Amendment to Agreement. 3. Section (a) of the Agreement hereby is amended to read, in words and figures, as follows: ^(8) LIABILITY ^CONSL•LTAN.T agrees to defend, indemnify and hold the CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents, free and harmless from any claim, demand, judgment, action or cause of action arising out of acts or omissions for which CONSULTANT is at fault or legally liable. This indemnification shall cover any and all costs and/or attorney's fees which CITY occurs related thereto. To insure the fulfillment of the purposes of this paragraph, CONSULTANT, during the term of tnia A;rgamnnt; yell marry and maintain, to *_he extent that such coverage is reasonably available, professional liability insurance coverage for the errors, omissions, and negligent acts of CONSULTANT in 2 v / the minimum amount of One Hundred Thousand Dollars. In addition, CONSULTANT will maintain during the term of this Agreement, general liability insurance coverage in the minimum amount of One Million Dollars, the CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents being named additional insured under said policy. Evidence of such coverage shall be in the form of a certificate of insurance which shall be filed with the CITY contemporaneously with the execution of this Agreement. All the polices required and maintained pursuant to the provisions hereof shall afford thirty (30) days prior written notice to the CITY with respect to material change cr cancellation of the policy.~~ 4. In the event that any action or proceeding is brought by either party to enforce any term or provision of the Agreement, as amended hereby, the prevailing party shall. recover its reasonable attorneys fees and costs incurred with respect thereto. 3 o J IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. RECREATION SYSTEMS, INC. By Ronald F. Page, President ATTEST: secretary CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By_ Dennis L. Stout, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga \S\131\RSIAGREE\R.C. 2.4B 4 iF ~ ~ ~ 1.. .4chitecnxe. LaMecspe Mchnacfwe. Recreatron ena Ernvonnwnw flanninQ January 9, 1985 k+'i 111 am L. Holley, Director Community Services tatty of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 SUBJECT: PkUPUSAI FOR PROFESSIUNAi. DESIGN SERVICES HERITAGE CDNMUNITY PARK AND RED HILL COMSUN[TY PARK Dear Bill: This proposal for professional design services is submitted in ac- cordance with your request and reflects our interpretation of re- quired work. Contents include a suggested scope of work, proposed prol ect team, and discussion on professional fees. Our proposal is based on the understanding that Doth parks will be detigned as a single Droject, with one set of drawings and specifications. SCOPE OF SERVICES It is RSI's intent to produce a final rwrk product that meets the ob,iectives of the City in terms of design quality, vandal resistance, innovation, iw.iyei ..m,u vi n.i •v.y ioti0,i SG`icJb~6a• TJ "; JL achievement of this goal, adjustments to this program can,be~made. Mork will include, but is not limited to the following: Phase I - Preliminarv Construction Plans, Outline Specifications and Cost Estimate 1. Drepare preliminary plans and outline specifications to finalize actual scope of improvemm~ts. 2. Prepare detailed cast estimates for all improvements. 3. Submit for City and Agencies' review and approvals, as required. 4. Correct plans as directed and adjust scope to meet budget limita- tions. Phase I' - Construction Plans. Specifications and Cost Estimate 1. Prepare final plans, sperifications and bidding documents in sufficient detail to obtain competitive bids. Plans to meet all federal, state and local requirements, as necessary. Con- sultant shall provide required check prints and reading copies of specifications for checking and processing. 7500 F.mi Nutwooa 4.wnua. Smw 770 FNbnon. C7N~1anq 97671 17141979-6377 Nilltam L. Holley January 9, 1985 Page 2 2. Submit for final checking and correct plans as necessary. 3. Present final cost estimate for review and approval. Phase III -Construction Obserntton Services 1. Assist Lity in the 6ldding arocess. 2. Review and approve all shop drawings. 3. Providz site visitations and reports on construction progress and quality, with recamaendations far correction of defictenttes, as required. 4. Assist in determining and processing change orders. 5. Review and approve Interim pay request. 6. Participate 1n construction inspections, as required. PROJECT TEAM As prime consultant, Recreation Systems, inc. N111 assure full rezponst- bility for coordination of the total project. Service wilt include as- slgnment of P1aiMing responsiDiiitlei, client and comaunity contact, accampitshment scheduling, and the evaluation and interpretation of project requirements, as outlined in our Scope of Services. 1{VnILV n{V\ vJO ~~ LANG, registered landscape Architect, will participate in project de- sign and coordinate plan production. Recreation Systems, Inc. believes in the concept of team planning and the need for the inclusion of comprehensive coverage of planning needs with individuals or firms that have recognized expertise in each area of concern. RAHDALL K. MEYER, registered California Architect, will be responsible for designing the park buildings and feature structures. MILLDAM ASSOCIATES will participate in the design of the street improve- ments and the drainage systens required at both parks. RSI aM MILLDAM have a long standing association which has produced many successful pro- jects. CRC,PFSS1 Drini FEE Recreation Systems, Inc. proposes to complete all services for Lath sites as described in the scope of services for the following lump sum fees: ~a Milliam L Holley January 9, 1985 Page 3 Preliminary Plans, Outline Specifications and Cost Estimate (5103,200.00 less #37,470.00) f65,730.00 Constnedion Plans, Speciftcati ons and Estimate 112,060.00 Construction Observation 68 800.00 Th1s fee is established in accorda~e with the Los Angeles County Sliding Percentage Fee Schedule shown below, and is based upon a construction bud- get of 56,000,000 or actual construction costs, whichever 15 lower. The fuil fee reset ved by Reercati on Systems. Inc. far the Design Development Phase (537,470.00) has been proportionately credited against the fee for preliminary plans, outline specifications and cost estimate. Comoensation Bazed on Percentaae of Construction Cost Construction Cost 0 to 530,000.00 530,000.00 to 560,000.00 560,000.00 to 5100,000.00 #100,000.00 to 5200,000.00 5200,000.00 to 5500,000.00 5500,000.00 to 51.000.000.00 f1 .000,000.00 to 12.000,000.00 >~.~+w ,vlV.w Lu i~.uw,wv. +~ 55,000,000.00 to 510,000,000.00 Maximum Fee 12X 10X 8X #8,000,00 + 7;X of amount over 5100,000.00 #15,500.00 + 7X of aaaunt over #200,000.00 536,500.00 + 6}X of amount over 5500,000.00 569,000.00 + 6X of amount over #1,000,000.00 5294,000.00 + 5X of`amount aver 55,000,000.00 Any increases in scope of improvements not currently included in the master plan and design development reports will be added to the construction bud- get and design fees accordingly. Should Extra Services be required or requested by the City, RSI can provide such services at thefollowing hourly rates: Principal 560.00/hr. Construction Representative (45.00/hr. Pro,lect Landscape Architect 540.00/hr. Landscape Architect/Designer 537.50/hr. Orattsperson 520.00-#25.00/hr. I-IP.`l,fe1 SiS.DD/hr. (These hourly rates will remain in effect throughout 1985.) RSI's fees include all casts for transportation, telephone, interim sub- missions, review specifications and check prints. The City shall pro- M7111an L. Holley January 9, 1985 Page 4 vide or assume all casts for reproduction of final plans and specifica- tions for bidding purposes. The City shall also provide soil and structural tests as required. RSi can coordinate these services for the City at attual costs plus Sl for handling. Thank you for the oooortunity to suhatt this orooosal. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to cali~. ~'u~?r/// truly,(y~% ACCEPTANCE: ~~ / _ n ~ • Executed on behalf of the C1ty~of (~~ Rancho Cucamonga, California this 16th day of January, 1985. RDNALD F. PAIGE ~- Prestdent BY: TItt : '~ ' 9 i~~ ~" ! ATTEST: `~~c~it.L'c• ~C. ..Ctcf~e' I ~~ /, . /t ACA RNM 6NT ' r TNIS ACR66MRNir wad• •nd entered SplO thL day of 19RSr by •nd be wren the C[TT ey RRNCNO NCnNnNW Iharelna[br 'CItY'1 nM RdCRgRttCN STSTt1Nr INC. (hr[ain+t4e 'CpI6NLT+NT')r MI TH RSS STNr the ryrelre Aerato do agree ea [ollouar 11) rRQTRLB Is) Thrt th• ci TY 1• aulron• of ohtrlnlnq conrtroction pLnn, rpclllcetlona •na comtructlon oMrrvetlon urrlcea (or Rm N[LL CCMMNNITT'pdW[ snd NRRITN.R CCNM911It] PRPII rM . ID) that tie Ct tT hu dr !real nrd Nrt tha CY31m4trSTr legs !her vl th !n ruD-eoruulcaneer L gwlltlM to pr[on the wrp rM Ic) Thrt tha cnN3ULTRRT Mr rgsrrd to pr(oa tM unlnr rrgnirMr rnd Id) thrt tM 3egLLtlre body o[ the CI'R her havto[on drtenlned Nrt Nr publle lnNroQ conwdancar rM nrcusi ty rsgnlrr eM aregltlen of t)i1L 1graW nt. 1]1 ti1M1PCP31 M CaebLTMT Phsar t - yrrlAlnrry Conelcucllon Plrm rr~d 6Mel Qcrtlonr Ir) Pnprrr pn1L1Mry Conatnetlon plats +M al11Mr rpecl (lnlloM to ueaDlLh dgl9n thsu and fits liar rotarl roots o[ lni list iwpromrn4l ID) Prrprn datrilad cos! utlMG for all lnp[owMnb. Phba it - Conwenmllon PLM. enact pestlons urd Cntuct ponwenG Ir) Prrpnrr final plrnar •Meltleatlonrr +nd bidding aoeuMnb !n au[(leiat drtafl n ebbin coRptl lira corrtrwtln bide. fLM to lneorDOU tr City rGndrrdr rnd art ell Prdrnlr Rbtar nM locrl ragolrewnbr rr nrcupry. CgN3ULTdMT •AD 11 prorfd• pv.n rb.Ct P.1.^.ta _.._ ra_.. -9 aw....• •MOiiiC+riaa nr eMet1M rM prvenailpr (D) Sgbw/t [or (1M3 chrdlnq rM cornet p1rM a Mnarrp ICI yront y1M1 cMt utiRrb for rota rM rpprarll Id/ M+Lt Clly Sn the D1dd1M Prang. ~/ ) Phue III -Conn [ruction ebnrye[IM IQ Revl« erxl epPro» ell .pap, dr«tipq IDI Prarld• nl to vLltdlaner .. naeuurYr .~ prop. r. reporb on onetructlon progno •nd goell ey wl th nconnende tlon• [ar cerrac!!vn e[ de[lelenelul Icl Mdnt In da b[anixq etM pren4lrg eMwe oede[q Idl n«3« exq eppre« lneerln p> iegwetex lei yertlcl'peG In <onntrucelon fwpeliwn. ee rwvind, 171 one eCnynULn The COne04T1U1T evren• to pe[ton ell urvlwe a Mb1Ld In Pe[equph 131r Moe I sod II, In • prlad not to erwM ow Aendred trentY-flw 11 ]SI dq• [oil«!nq rrltt« «tMrlty tv proceed. Tien eehedulxe ere evb~evt to cMnw dependent a: deleYv cawed D> p[aceeellq or cweonl ty coerdlnetion wgel rebnte •nd .. eutpelly egwed to Dy crtt end CanM.TNIT. Ill COMISIddTtON CITI epeeee to py COnB11LTnnT [or lte eerrlwe Mr«xWer eM COIIW1LTnnT greee ep eeeept tr« CITY a lwp eve [w nteDllehed In eawrdenw rlth ' th• el LdliW Hmentps qe eehndele •tbahed M[e ta. yortbreorex COMPOLYdnY egreae lheG Me luti he IL77 x170.00) [or the Oulgn pe rel opont taper to [or both puke shell De cndl tad egeinet pro[welonel [w [vr Phue I. pnYwenb shall De eede non thl• open wenlpt e[ vrltbn lmoieu prorlding Nat N. eccwuLtlw W>pent eMll net enwe6r 7w o[ utWted tear nlwe i]7r N0,00r et tM euheiuion of RelLinery eewtrwtlw plena 10V o[ utlee tad fee •t Nn eaheleeiw et Ilwl: row ltnatiw plem eM epal[lwtlow o[ cMek1n91 73• v[ uefeu tad fee tellorln9 eaepLelon o[ nil aorreallone o' preventive o[ [lwl bid dntv~ntry ov. of eernu N• bub on tM 1«er• deernetlree [ollwi.g rave/pt o[ Wb w awl, rhleNVr L lover. ehoold • lw~ •lbrwtlYee M ecwPted M N. C1T7. N. 1 [lgen no Mta Wn tOt Delve NN [lwl wtL 1001 0[ ectwl [a [v11Mn~ eweptenw M fpe 2 IS) T6tNl NkT1011 dltM[ petty hereto ry tea/rte Nb A4reeeen! upn glvlp o! 4n 110) drys' wrltbn pollee !e the other petty, end upon eveh bcM nt Gan, CON6ULTNNT shell M entitled to • pro re4 tee Meed span rptk eetwlly eceavpll•Aed by hie r of tM dab of the g1w1n4 a! path o[ ach tealwar. 161 pUlypgl NT1NC/Nfp+ONIRION //O CONSULTMT tMll provide, et~ coat to Ne cIT[, el3 shack prlneevM nedlp eoplr o! epeilSeetlone r rorr[y !o' proarw plena. CITT eMll seers aw4 0[ repredection of eerlruetlon docvwn4 ter DldAln4 pepres. ly) OI1I.ICATI(N8 OI NCENCT C1Ty .hell De obllgetN ea .apply CONdULTNNS rlN rpulred 4pp[ephie rd hpwdeq •arwryel nofl lnottlgetloa, lnclndlp egronany end [rude !lent em •mh otMr elU lnfotrtlon, records, [Meer ar reprtn u ery M reentry, eM rhell rb m11Wb NeWen o! /b refit [or aorYl4tlr riM CONSULTNNT. Irl LIAQLTR CONWLTNNT tgry~lo hold eM CI'rt, 14 e4ceN oflldeL, alfinn, ~ !.playa. eM egab, [ru tnd Nvlu• fro. any eLL, dome, ltdgrnt, set/on or awe of astir Nrlch St toreoted r1U oe erlwn rt M fM CCNMTNIT'• prte[rnr o[ /4 obllgeaav penrnt to thir ngrnnat end ry •M ell ep r! cot4 rnd/or •ttornry !re Mleh Cl ey Sneen [e Ltd Hereto. To rrr N• !ul [I1Lat o[ tM pgrpout o! thb r[t4repA, CONSULTANT, derin4 Me [.o of !Alt prwrnq rill carry e1M rintel n, to fM aunt that rush cowrge Se rrtowbly •velleblw, prof relend 13 •bl ll ty lnevunr aowrpr far the vre4, on/r1oN, end npllwnt ecU~e! CONBULTMT In Me nlnLr count o! gloo,0a0. 1n eddl Ilan, CIMBULT)NT wl ll rlntan ao[lr tM 4n et N4 h9 ~aeernq wrnl iLD(ll ty Snnrnr eownw In tM elnler e.owt o[ i(,egp,gqpl,CM CI Ty, l4 o!(lee[r, eeploya• ad epnb Mlnq ee add/tloal nerd lnrund under rid pollee 6dMnd of wch covuga .hell M /n Me fov o[ • CrtlfleeU o[ Irorpe which tMll M tiled riN tM CITT cptaparoudy wl tll the ercatlnn e[ ~lhle N4reerne. 1111 the polleLt rage! rd •nd r1n41rd w .vest 4 the Ttavl+lons n.rer .h.il ee4m !niter uol a.n r/er rrle4n tar r ens eln r1N rape! to r4r/el Mtpe or aerelle!!r e! Ne policy. [~ i IYI NMiCRa Netf<H pD[agent to lAle R9Teoent cbell be given by Dnl Md aGt4 rllr pnteger prbpeldr eddnnM to Ua partLe u tollwn (el To CITT Mllll~ L. Rollay. Dlrentos Cweunl ty aervicae C1 tY o[ poncho Cucaeonge :.0. Box Rqi peneho Cviceeon9lr Ca11)ornL 91i]O lbl To CW&ILTIWT RoN1R R. Vnlge. PdntRent ' Reereetl6n RYeta. Ine. ' ]500 bent NUtveod Rtanaa. 6u1 to t10 Tullnrtonr GlltornL 91R]1 IM NITNRRO MNRpROy. !M prtlo Mato eeU1e Ne Rgrea~n! to M epacuted on tM Rey aM yeer drat abote vrl eten• CITP OR ppNCgp CUCRIUN011 pri JQI D. NIRRI./r N11yM RT[CRTr ewYwT R. RuTxmar, clrr cLepR RxRR~Rltp~ Rrarnw, 1RC. 1 1 .--. ~ i R11 pd WA P. PRICRr RpR 1DR1 ~~ A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT „mac" DATE: May 4, 1988 ~4S T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell R. Maguire, City Engineer ui: Teter lone, Apministrative Analyst SUBJECT: Approval to purchase a Vermeer Stump Cutter Model 665A from Vermeer-California of Ontario, California as a sole source vendor in the amount of 520,615.00 - Account No. 01-4647-7044 RECOMIEIIOIITI011: It is recammer~ded that the City Council approve the purchase of a Vermeer Stump Cutter Model 665A from Vermeer-California of Ontario, California, as a sole source vendor and authorize said purchase in the amount of 520,615.00 - Account Mo. 04-4647-7044. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On July 15, 1987, the City Council approved authorization to seek bid proposals for all Maintenance Section capital equipment budgeted in the 1907-88 Program of Service. The stump cutter was on the list of equipment aDDroved for bid proposals on July 15, 1987. In researching available equipment and vendors, staff finds that Vermeer-California of Ontario, California is the only authorized dealer of suitable stump cutters in this Dart of the state. Therefore, we are seeking sole source status for Vermeer of California and approval to proceed with the purchase. Respe submitted, r RHM:PT:dlw nrmv nrn o n wrn vn nr rr a aanern .. 9 STAFF REPORT ~~'~ ~~ i ~ 5 t IC 'J •• VV• j,,I lit 197 ~ DATE: May 4, 1988 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION REODESTIN6 LAFCO TO REYI EN THE CRY'S PROPERTY 7AX REVENUE PURSUANT TD SB 1063 RECOIMENDATION- The City Council adopt the attached resolution requesting LAFCO to review the property tax revenue split for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Backareund Under the Provisions of SD 1063, cities that incorporated during fiscal year 1977-88, are eligible to have LAFCO review the property tax split imposed by the Gount,y when Proposition 13 was implemanteA July 1, 1918. Essentially, cities that incorporated in FY 1917-78, did not have an opportunity to establish a tax rate and have that tax rate locked in place When YropoS ition 13 Was implemented. AS a result, counties were able to determine the tax rate the newly incorporated cities would implement. Oe ne rally, the new cities have found the counties gave them the minimum tax rate revenue and required the previously provided county services to be provided by the cities. The cost to the new cities to continue the former county services has been more expensive than anticipated. The result has been SB 1063, which allows fora renegotiation of the property tax split by using the LAFCO system. S[aff has been actively involved in the passage of SB 1063 and recommends the City Councii support the resolution requesting LAFCO's review of the City's property tax split. Re spec tfuiiy submitted, r ~ ~ Jim Hart Administrative Services Director JH ;cv ~~ RESGLUTI ON N0. V V ~ ~(Q O RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING LAFCO TO MAKE A DETEP,M INAT ION OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUE FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PURSUANT TD THE PROVISIONS Of SB 1063 WHEREAS, 56 1063 provides that Cities which incorporated during the fiscal year 1977-78 may apply to LAFCO for a determination of appropriate property tax revenue, and WHEREAS, the City Council finds it in the public interest that said application be made; NOW, THEREFORE, BE iT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby requests the Local Agency Formation Commission to undertake determination of appropriate property tax revenue pursuant to the provisions of SB 1063. ~~ DATE: May 4, 1988 vu r yr nnw~,nv wt,ninvrv~n MEMORANDUM T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jack Lttm, lleputy Executive Director BY: l.eAnn Faust, Redevelopment nalyst SUBJECT: Notice of Scheduled Public Hearing F At the May 18, 1988 meeting, a joint public hearing will be required to review the necessary documentation for the proposed l=ire Facilities bond issuance. Approximately .49.5 million Certificates of Participation are proposed to be sold to finance acquisition and constntetian of fire. protection facilities and equipment This idea was conceptually approved by the Agency Board on April 6, 1988. iuc M~awy wvuiu t~w~i~aac ,i,c in~iiiiica wnii uw uuuu pi uuccua, and lease them to the City. The City in tarn, will lease [hem to the Fire District. At the joint hearine, the City Council will, as it has done in prior financings, review: 1. the bond documents which would enact the above mentioned agreements 2. a purchase agreement with the underwriting firm 3. tiie Preliminary Gificiai Statement, so that a final Official Statement can be produced 4, the sale of the Certificates of Participation ~a rrmv nn n ~rrr un r•i ~r• n unwrr. STAFF REPORT DATE: May 4, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager EROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy A. Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: APProval to Annex Tract Nos. 13476, located on the northeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Tryon Street, and 12902, located on the Nest side of Hermosa Avenue south of ~ Almond Street, to Street lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 as Annexation Nos. 44 and 28 and setting the date of public hearing for June 1, 1988 RECOMENCIITION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Reports for Annexation Nos. 44 and 28 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described tracts to Street Ligfiiing Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2, respectively. Analvcic /Rarkornund Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex Tract Nos. 13476 and 12902 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No. 44 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Ne. 2 as Annexation No. 28 and setting the public hearing date for June 1, 1988. Also attached for Council consideration are resolutions giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Reports for the subject annexations. Letters from the developers requesting the subJect annexations are on file in the Engineering Division. Respectful ubmitted, Attachments ~'9 RESOLUTION N0. D D ~ ~ u / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMINdGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 44 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 wNEREAS, on Nay 4, iv8d, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and NHEREAS, the City Engineer has :node and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and kHEREAS, said City Council has duly considere4 said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufflcfent, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOX, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized casts and expenses o~~ork and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descri6edin said report, the boundarfes of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sa ssessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to 6e received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's PQp~rt for t.e p~!rp~ses of all suh<_equenf p oceedirgs, and pursuant fe the proposed district. ~Ov C[TY OE RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation No. 44 for Tracts 13476 and 12902 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972), SECTION 2. Generai Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance Of strict No. 1, The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on maior streets iarterial and certain col? ectnr streets) as shown on the lighting District Altas Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting irt~rovement on the individual development is hereby made apart of rh; eporr rp the ......,..xtent ,., i' ,aid pla~~., and spacific~ Kars attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. ~/ SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be inwrred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No, 1 has been demarcated into Lwo zones. Zone i is eamprised of street tight improvemen is on mat or streets for residential improvements (single family, multi-family, rondominiums and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and institutional protects throughout the City. It has been determi,led that one acre of Land in industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Enerov Ccst: amp Size* Lamps YTD No. of Lamps Annex No. 44 New Lamp Total btlUUL 44tl 1G 4bU 9500E 520 0 520 16,000E 16 0 16 22, OOOL 4 0 4 27,500E 17 0 17 *Nigh Pressure Sbdium Yapar Dotal Total Annual Lamp Size Lam s Rate Mo's Maint. Cost 5EOOL 460 % S 8.93 % 12 = S 49,293.60 9500E 520 X 510.16 X 12 - 63,398.40 16,000E 16 % 512.08 X 12 - 2,319.36 22, OOOL 4 X S13, A4 X 12 = 664,32 27,5UU 1% X 315,.11 X 12 3,123,'G4 Total Annual Main t. Cost 5118,798.92 2. Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before thfs annexat fon 16,689 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 66 Total Assessment Units 16,955 /b~ 3. Cost par Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost - ElID 798.92 = 37.00/year/unit No. o Um is to tstrtcL Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this reDOrt and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. I", Annexation No. 44. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of thls report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Nhen units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7, Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's ReDOr*.. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers ail testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4, Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5, Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. ~a3 EXHIBIT "A" Properties and improvements to 6e included wfthin Rnnezation No. 44 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 1: Assess. No. of Lam s to 6e Annexed -rrojeci Acreage 6mt aawL ? L L GL. ~ u,au L Zone 1 TR 13416 --- 37 3 --- --- --- --- TR 12902 --- 29 9 --- --- --- --- 66 12 --- --- --- --- Zone 2 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ~/ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. ~. Arq~EXATION NO. 44 w w n a n r N o URIV! Y ~~ n ! n N tl r f1 ~ 11 n !• } } y ~ n 1t~ ~I ~ 'I ~L ~~ N/ al ! f I • I I d I n n\ r I l x l f IYIzI • I f I• I x ~IIIIINIII NIIIII Y~YM II ~~~ C1TY OF RANCHO CUCAI[ON(iA s`'~ ' '' COZTN`PY OF SAN BEBNARDINO ~,~': ~ ~ 8TA1'E OF CAI•II+ORNU ~ T ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION NO. 4 4 R R[I S4K R4 Wif 2f s ITj .. r-i '\ RENAIMOER I 1 PARCEL : 1 .. I J1_~~ r l ~-~~°~,.. 2f I ~ N •, 21 1':1 w --1 N ~ i I F C i ml~i 23 ~ ~ 2! 2~ T Rineaa :r. ti I ~ I~ 20 191 I- \ 18 ti ~ ~ I 1! 12 ~ _ -~ =JyIVP. /_-~-- oRRRr oRiv ~', ~~ I I I---~ ~. ' r' ~~r' )/R4 I 21 16 F Is - I• ~ f \ 9 ~R ~ ~5 1 '., 3 2 I '.uuiafu`rt n.Rn 5,~~. CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1[ONOA .,_. ~• COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO n ~ ` BTATE OF CALII~'ORNIA ~,~~ N RESOLUTION N0. 8 A ~' ~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 44 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING ANO L1GHIING ACT OF i572 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBU ECT IONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the prov?sions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division IS of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Description of Mork: That the public interest and convenience rare and ski on of this City Councii to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located wit i'~i'n roadway rrg -o~-way enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on mans which are on fife in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 44 to Street LT ghting Maintenance District No. 1". SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the contempla e>-d word, in-t-~inro~ said [,i y ouncT is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 44 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1" maps^, file .,, the office of the C'ty Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. Report of Engineer; The City Council of said City 6y Resolution No. * Fas approved the report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's P,eport, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1" is on file in the office of the Cfty Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. ~~ RESOLUTION PAGE 2 SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected a~~Fe same ime an In a same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and Bald Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearin Notice is hereby given that on June 1~ at t our o In t e City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any o6Jections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may aDPear and show cause why said work should not be done or carrf ed out or why said district should not be formed Tn accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the Lima set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Lan~dsca~i~ny~and L1 htina Act of 1972: All the work herein propos~sFiaP e~ o~n~ carri+~oug n pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of Cal ifornta designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division LS of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of fal ifnrni a. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be ma~u ant io ectlon o ~ e overnment ode. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Dail Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of On ar o, a ornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. /a g RESOLUTION N0. $g ' a71 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 28 TO STREET LIGHTSNG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2 MnEREAS, on Nay 4, 1988, the City Councii of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and MHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Att, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and NHEREAS, Bald City Council has duty considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOM, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report 6e, and each of them are hereby, prel7minari ly approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and described-fn said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3; That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said- s~sment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained fn said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said reDOrt shall stand as the City Engineer's PwDnr} fer 4,g ni~rpncnc of 317 cphcngi~onf prnrenAin gc, 3nr1 p~ruland 4n 1ha proposed district. /a ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 Annexation No. 28 for Tracts 13476 and 12902 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscapins and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance Otstri ct No. 2. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on local streets as shown on the Lighting District Altos Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans anri street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved 6y the City Engineering Of vision. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street light ina imornvemnnt nn tha inAlyi Anal Aaruln~enT ie hereby mdd^ apart of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repafr, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. lid SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 is comprised of street light improvements on local streets for residential improvements single family only) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone will he assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District, The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: Nn. of Lamps Lamps Annex New Lamp Lamp Size; YTD No. 28 Total 5800E 1,314 31 1,345 9500E 4 --- 4 *High Pressure Sodiun Vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps Rate Mo's Mai nt. Cost 5800E 1,345 X E 8.P3 X 12 = E144,130.20 9500E 4 X E10.16 X 12 487.68 Total Annual Maint. Ccst = 5144,617.88 2. Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation = 4,934 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 = 66 Total Assessment Units 5,000 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost E144 617.88 528.92/year/unit No. o Units n strict ~66if- Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcei as explained in Section 6. ~l / SECTIDN 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of Lhe Droposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2", Annexation No. 28. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units Der net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a repor*_ with the City Council. 5. Everv vear in June, the City Council conducts a oubllc hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. /~a-- E%N1 BIT "A" Properties and improvements to be included within annexation No. 28 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 2: Assess. No. o~ Lam s to be Annexed rruj eci Aereage unto ~a ~ ouv~ io, u~ ~ c L TR 13476 --- 37 18 --- --- --- --- TR 12902 --- 29 13 --- --- --- --- 66 31 --- --- --- --- /~ 3 ASSESSMENT mIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. Z Af~B~EXATION NO. 2 8 ~~~~.~; C1TY OF RANCHO CUCADLONOA ~, ; ~ COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO / c; {~' +~ STATE OF CALII+ORNIA - A T ~M 1~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 2 ANNEXATION NO. Z 8 y •L MOMD-\1 . I I .. 4 REMAIROER J, GARtEI ; 1 J y/ ~,s ~\ 21 I I \, ~_i p 2! ~ ~ I ~; 4 ri 23 I ~~` II ~ f r fMAiN cry ~ 23 24 I T n I~ X["T.Ot( CT. 1 21 20 A I '~ ..+a ~, ,,, ~ /~. \ ~~~ ~/ ~~11'A'}~'~li ~ I6 .~" Il IB ~I 4i 3 I 1 12 _ _I_ 'i /~-~ I _-~-__JA~A. ~. % 1 r-- T - AA[n aa. 2! 8 1 9 IO II ~( ~ - + Si ~~+oraw+f~n cwr~ ~ ~ :. J ~ • ~. ~ I I I I / ..nKi "DArf .tw ~ ._ _~ .__L ~,~`~> CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI[ON(iA :.,_ ~ COUNTY OF 8AN HERNARDIIQO x ~~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA . Z ~. N V~ s Im __ -,~.~~ RESOLUTION N0. $$ - ~ '~ A RESOLUTION OF THE C[TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEI(ATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: OES[GNATING SAID ANNEJ(ATI ON AS ANNEIfATION N0. 28 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING Ah0 Li6HTING ACT GF i972 AND OFFERIWG A TIME AND rLACE FOR H'cARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Dursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1912, being Division IS of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1, Descri tion of Work: That the public interest and conveniencece rye an~E~e~ntention of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2, Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located wi i'EF n roadway r~i-way enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more Darticularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 28 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2". SECTION 3. Descri tion of Assessment District: That the contemplate~worTc,~ in t e op n ono sa y ounc is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 28 to Street Lighting MaintPnan~e District No. 2" mane is nn file in thn nff jtn of ihn rity Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. Re ort~of Engsne~er: The City Council of said City 6y Resolution No. ~ has approved Lhe report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District rvo. 2" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made far all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and fur the extent of the work. ~( RESOLUTION PAGE 2 SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shalt be coltecte addle same t me a~~e manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall fiie a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which Lime assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. lime and Placelace of HeartHearin~.: Notice is hereby given That ^ Jana 1-'~,Si '~, at tree fiour`o 7:30 P.M. in the Ctty Council Chanters at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any ob,lectians to the work ar extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention, Protests must be Tn writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof fs interested, sufficient to identify the sane, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or ab~ections wilt De considered. If the signer of any protest Ts rat shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be acca~anTed by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION i. Landsca in and L1 htin Act of 1972: All the work herein propose s all a one an carte t roug n pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of Cat ifornia designated the Landscaping and lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. StCTtON 8. Publicat ton of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be made pursuan o c on o e overnmen ode. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The DaTI Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published to the City of On ar o, a ornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. (< CiTY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 4, 1988 T0: Cfty Council and City Manager FROM: Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr, Engineering Aide r~_ ~r SUBJECT: Approval to Mnex Tract Nqs. 13476, located on the north- east corner of Hellman Avenue and Tryon Street and 12902, iocated on the west side of Hengsa Avenue, south of Almond Street, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 as Mnexation Nn. 46 and setting the date of public hearing for June 1. 1988 REC01/EIOATION It is recamamnded that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Mnexation No. 46 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the C1ty's intention to annex the above described protects to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. Analysts/Background Atfsr6n_d Fn,. rH.. r...~..,, intent to annex~Tract Nos.r 13476, located ~on~the ortheast orneryof Hellman Avenue and Tryon Street and 12902, Located on the west side of Hermosa Avenue, south of Alarond Street, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Annexation No. 46 and setting the public hearing date far June 1, 1988. Also attached for Cguncll consideration is a resolutior. 9lving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subtect annexation. Letters from the developers requesting the subtect annexation are on file in the Engineering Division. Re/sD s bn~ltted, RHM:JM:th Attachments /I~ RESOLUTION N0. $ b ~~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOIiGII, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNERATION N0. 46 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 MHEREAS, on Mqy 4, 1988, the City Council of the City cf Poncho Cucamonga directed the Ctty Engineer to make and fate with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; arM IiHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report 1n writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented Lo this Council for consideration; and 11HFREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every pert thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor aqy pert thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOM, THEREFORE OE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o spa d-work and of the t~identai expenses in connection therewith, contained to said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirwx!d. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descr e n said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sated-Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subd1v1s1on, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained 1n said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report fo~'poses of alt subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed dis;riot. /~ 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 ANNEXATION N0. 46 for Tract No. 13476 and 12902 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaofng and Ughtirtg Act of 1472). SECTION 2. General Descriotlon This City Council has elected to annex all new subdivisions into Landscape Maintenance District No. 46. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract No. 13476 and 12902 as well as on the cots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained to the annexed tracts are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right-of-way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Speciflcattons The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference fs hereby made to the subiect tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and cn.N1s~.,.+.._ . SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs wTll'be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (f.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 including Annexation No. 46 is as follows: Existing Annex New D istrici No.46 Total Landscape Area 1,056,881 129,455 1,186,336 No. of D. U. 9,691 66 9,757 Per Lot Annual Assessment 1,186,336 x 5.30 f355,900.80 102 x 5.00 = 510.00 535680 '~ ' f36,53 / U Assessaent shall apply to each lot as enuserated in Section 6 and the attached assesssen! diagram. Nhere the development covered by this annexation involves frontage aiong arterial or collector streets, which are designated for inclusion 1n the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced. SECTION 3. Assessment Diagram A co¢y of the eroposed assessment dSagram is attached to this report and labeled Exhibit A by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit W all cots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Nhere there 1s sore than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional W the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual axsessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the previous fiscal year which are W be recovered through assessmerts as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preilminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. CTty Councl) adopts Resolution of Intention to Mnex to District and sets nuhllr hn>rf .n A>~> 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimogy and determines to Mnex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year Tn May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the CSty Council conducts a public hearing and approves, ar modifies and approves the individual assessments. ~~~ Properties and taprovea~ents to be included within Annexation No. 46 to Landscape Matntenance District No. 1: IMINTAINED AREA TRACT D/U Tg.`Ft. -~l•~- Ea. 13416 37 Hellawn Avenue -- 27,195 102 i29D2 2~9. Conaaunlty Tra11 105 T~ ~a~ ASSESSMErff DIAGRAM IANOSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. T ANNEXATION N0. 96 N M N » M ^ N b `~~'°°`^ •Pi CITY OP RANCHO CUCAhfONGA # ~'; !-:ter..,'. :q T~ ~ V./f1 BIZ 6 ~ ENGINEERING DIVISION L VICINITY i\tAP nn n N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. ~, ANNEXATION N0. 4(o TI .. I r-Y 1 REMAIROER. I ~ I PARCEL T 1 I ~1 _ s, `~ " 27 - II ~ ~:,,1 K: -- ~ 2. r -I i I ~ ;; I ~ I~ m ' 23 l , ti E \ Y 23 2t 22 ~I 4[Yai~a tf. ~- ~ 21 20 19 Ti f r --~'MF11f'gH~-~ 16 .~ 17 1' ~~ ~ `~:.~. I IRR T f fO nfYY ~-- ~,AtNR a II ' C~ IS 3 112 i •` _ I I. I " :; --L-:Waraw z9 ~_ 9 1 s to ~ u I I ~u, i, +o+aunr couwr i ~ a0~f ~, ~~_~ ~/ ~ ~~" ~NritN~Y lnaat ~~C 11p ,sr °~`^~~, CITY OF RANCHO Ct,'CA~~IONGA ~, ~' ., V ~!~ ~~ " =~ ~ ~ EtiGINEERING DIVISION ~ T ~L~.~ VICINITY MAP 1\`I1 un - RESOLUTION N0. S V ~ a~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE M1IINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 46 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND DFfE RING A iTME AND PLACE FOR NEARING OD•JEC?IOhS THERETO NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the LaMSCaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Cade of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descri Lion of Mork: That the public interest and convenience require an t~s Fein e~nflon of this City Council to forty a msintenence district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those parkways and fac1111tes thereon dedicated for coamgn greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map w1tA1n the boundaries of the proposed maintenance dlstrlct described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation Includes the cost and supervision of any sprinkler system, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting, structures, and walls to connection with said parkways. SECTION 2. Location of Nork: The foregoing described work is to be w i •y.~ ... ,aaa a..ap niy eo aea,Cp La ai Lan(1pCapC Maintenance District No. 1 enamerated in the report of the City Engineer and Wore particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled 'Annexation No. 46 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. SECTION 3. Descri Lion of Assessaeent District: That the contemplated rTc, in a op n an o sa ty ounc is of acre than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which dlstrlct is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included wt thin the exterior boundary :pon •~. nayv mmm~etS an Nb. 46 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1' heretofore approved by the City Council of said City by Resolution No. *, indicating by said boundary lines Lhe extent of the territory included within the proposed assessment district and which ma 1s on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. l~ SECTION 4. Re rt of En lneer: The City Council of said City by Resolution o. as approve report of the engineer of work which repart indicates the aaaunt of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, ti tied 'Engineer's Report, Annexation No. 45, Landscape Maintenance District No. 1' is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for ail particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collecte ad twee are an ._ same manner ss Caunly taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and Bald CauncTl will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting 1n June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be detenined. SECTION 6. Time and Place~of Hearin : Notice is hereby given that on June i; i98~ at t ur o. p30 e. in~l~e City Councii Chambers at 9161 Base Line, 1n the City of Rancho Cucaaongs, aqy and all persons having aqy obJettions to the work or extent of the assessment district, mRy appear and show cause why said work should mat be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accorderce with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be 1n writingg and must contain a description of the property to which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the Ctty Clerk of said Ctty prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or obJections will be considered. If the signer of ally protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protes4 must contain or be accoepanied by written evidence that such signer 1s the ormer of the property so described. SECTION 7. LaMscepin9 and Lighting Act of 1972: A11 the work herein propose s all be done and carried t rou n pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California deslymated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be made pursuan ec on o e vernmen ode. The MAyor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once 1n The Da11 Re rt, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of On ar o, a orota, and circulated 1n the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ( 0 7` rrmv nr.+ n ~ u~ssn r+rrr n aanwr~ n 9 STAFF REPORT ~~'~ VNO~ C;r O'i o Fil U "ice I~: 1977 ~ DATE: Nay 4. 1988 1 TO: Mayor. City Counc it and Ci[y Manager !/~~^ Lam,`"~// PROM: Mark R. Lnr imer. Sr. Adminie trat ive Assistant: SUBJECT: SETTING PUBLIC BEARING POB JUNE 1. 1988 - CONSIDER HBNEMAI. OP AMBIJLANCE SERVICE PERMIT FOR MERCY AMBULANCE It is requested the City Council set June lr 1988 for coneiderati an of renewing ambulance eecvice permit for Mercy Ambulance. The purpose of this public hearing will be to review the performance of Mercy Ambulance end determine wfiether their permit to operate within Rancho Cucamonga shall be renewed. If you have any questions or coscerna regarding th ie ma[ter~ feel Ezee to contact me. THiL /dja /~ / -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA S'd'AFF REPORT DAIS: May 4, 1988 TO Mayor and Members of the Ciry Council FROM: Robert A. Riuo, Assistant Ciry Manager BY: Jerry e. Fulwood, Resource Center Coordinator SU9.JECT: Ac~'ttCtVALOF PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S RE ,;,i.,~%=;. Staff recommends that City Council adopt the attached Resolutbns giving preliminary approval of City Engineers Reports and declaring its inlentbn to levy and collect assessments within Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 for Fiscal Year 1988/89 and oNering a time and place For hearing objections thereto. Pursuant to the requirements of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 a Dreliminary engineer's report for each landscape maintenance district has bnen nrn..~rgw. ~, ;a;;;,, ,,; currenr ynarc 9~~%p;:c '- ,-,~;~~du as wan as projected expenditwes for fiscal year 1988/89. Landscape Maintenance JDistricts Nos. 2, 3A, 4, and 6 assessments will remain unchanged. Districts 1 and 5 are recommended to be lowered. District 3B (Commercial/Industrial) was formed during this fiscal year and fiscal year 1988/89 will be the first assas5ment year. Respectfully submitted, ~~ Robert A. Riuo Assistant City Manager RAR:JBF:sgr Attachments: Annual Assessment Rates Engineer's Reports (8) Resolutions (2) / ~~ ANNUAL ASSESSMENT RATES Landscape Distric! A'1 1985/86 $38.00 1966/87 $26.00 1987188 $25.50 1966/69 $25.00 (General City) Landscape District i12 223.77 223.77 195.00 195.00 (Victoria) Landscape District ;Y3A -0- 258.75 258.75 258.75 (Hyssop) Landscape District lt38 -0- -0. -0- 45.00 (Medians) landscape District K4 154.10 128.34 105.00 105.00 (Terra Vista) Landscape District MS 163.64 113.41 111.00 110.00 (Tot Lot) Landscape District #6 -0- -0. 195.00 195.00 t~arynl /~/ RESOLUTION NO. ~ p ' ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. f, 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 6 RESOLVED by the Ciry Council of the Ciry of Randro Curamongs that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Ad of 1972, the Ciry Engineer is required to make and file with the City Berk of the city an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of Ste maintenance andror improve- ment of said LaMscape Maintenance Districts Nos. i, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. WHEREAS, the Ciry Engineer has made and filed with the city Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Councl has duly considered said report and each and every pert thereof, and finds that each and every pan of said report is sugident, and that said report, nor any pan thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered as fellows: 1. That the Engineer's Estimate of hemized costs and expenses of sad work and of the fnddemai expenses In connecfion therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby preliminargy approved and confirmed. 2. That the diagrams showing the Assessment Dishicts referred to an described in said report, the boundaries of the sulxiivisans of land within said Assessment Districts are hereby preliminarily approved and con- firmed. 3. That the proposed assessments upon the suhdNisbns of land in said Assessment Districts in proponbn to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectNery, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report Is hereby preliminarily approved amf confirmed. ~. Th^; °^N •s^,...n shat: sta ~ as the City E yinesYS Annus! Repert tee the fiscal year 1988/89 far the purposes of all subsequent proceedings. 13a LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (General City) ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT Flacal Year 19118/89 The 1988/89 annual report for Landscape Maintenance Oistrict No. 1 (General City) is prepared in compliance with the requirements or Article 4. Chanter 1. Division 5 of the Rtraets antl Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lghting Act of 1972). This report provides information outlining actual maintenance costs for 1987/88 and projected costs for fiscal year 1988/89. The projected costs are used to establish the necessary assessment rate to provide the highest quality landscaping while maintaining or lowering assessments. Specifically, assessments will be used to furnish services and materials for the maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of parkways within this district. The maintenance of Landscape Maintenarce District No. 1 is considered of general benefit to all areas in the district antl the cost shall be divded as indicated in this report. Detsiled maintenance activifies inGude the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any Improvement, providing for the Iffe, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, me maintenance, repair and graffiti removal from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Parkway improvements within andscape Maintenance District No. 1 were constructed 6y the developers of the individual subdivisions. The plans and parkways are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. FISCAL YEAR 1987188 REVIEW Maintenance during the current fiscal year has been normal except for bss of trees during the wind storm. Funds were available 1o replace the damaged or bst trees in the Maintenance and Operations account. To provide specifb funds for the repair or replacement of trees and other landscaping due to a disaster type situation a Contingency account has been established with $1,000 being transferred into the account. Earth year additional kmrJc wul {~ addetl to insure SU,iii:ieni funds for iraee, BIC. dUB 10 SlefmS. ~3 / 87188 )~ AStDF 02/29/88 PRQ1ECfED 6/30/88 A55e55ment Admin. $5,289 $21,536 $21,536 Payroll 5,695 2,224 2,224 Maint./Operations 18,964 630 10,000 Vehicle Maint. 898 -0- -0- Contrad Services 31,014 13,873 20,809 Capital Expenditures 50,000 -0- 25,000 w.a,er 26,^00 "652 '9,000 Electric Utilities 3,500 2,067 3,100 Irrig. Restoration 6,028 -0- 1,000 Entry Monuments 170,000 -0- 170,000 Contingency (Trees) 1.000 -0- _0_ $317,388 $52,982 $272,669 During the current fiscal year the folbwing trails wer e annexed to landscape Maintenance District No. 1: Annexation 33 Tract 13118 102 S.F. Annexation 34 Tract 11997 19 S.F. Tract 12835 132 T.H. Tract 10246 15 S.F. DR 86-12 114 Ants. Annexation 35 Tract 11342 7^c S.F. Tract 12577 16 S.F. Annexation 36 Tract 10349 57 S.F. Annexation 37 Tract 12640-3 50 S.F. Tract 11549-1 27 S.F. Annotation 38 Tract 13542-1 96 S.F. Tract 13475 29 S.F. Tract 13353 15 CoMos. Tract 10414 17 S.F. Annexation 39 (No Developments Annexed -Only parkways) Annex tics 4C Tract 1~~,,, 304 S.P. Annexation 41 DR B5-O6 248 Apts. Annexation 42 Tract 13275 290 Condos. 2 /3~ FISCAL YEAR 1988/89 One area of concern with landscaped areas is water consumption. It is imperative that etfods t>a made to conserve water due to a possible water shortage but also to maintain the bwest possible water charges. The use of water sensor devices has proven to be a good irnestment. Monies will be budgeted for 1988/89 to implement a program far the installatbn of sensors in parkways within landscape Maintenance Disaict No. 1. Another new account will be established to budget funds for tree maintenance. The Cify Maintenance Section will begin during 8sca1 year 1988;89 to pravlde a wimple:e YBo aalnienance program. Trees will be invaniorad, monitored, and pruned to provide healthy trees, not just treos that are pruned every few years. PROJECTED 1988/89 EXPENDITURES Assessment Administration $29,516 Maintenance/Operations 26,771 Vehicle MaIntJOperatbns 6,488 General Liability 905 Contract Services 39,392 Capital Expenditures (Sensors) 20,000 Water 35,000 Electric Utilities 5,000 Tree Maint./Centrac! Admin. 16,425 Contingency (Tree Replacement) 5,000 tAd d7S Projected Revenue - 1988/89 It is estimated there will be 7379 assessment units within this district during 1988/89. After review of expenditures, assessment receipts, possible carryover lunds ($113,000) and projected costs, the assessment rate for Fiscal Year 1988/89 can be lowered by .50 to $25.00/unit. 7379 X 525.00 - $184,475 Assessment receipts are not received until after December 10. The estimated carryover funds wiii hw ucwd in fund ihw diciriri maintwnanrs nniii .ianuarv /33 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT Fiscal Year 7988/99 The annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Anicle 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Ca+^, S!atc cf California (Landscaping and L'ghting AG of 1972j. This report deals with the actual maintenance costs for fiscal year 1987/88 and the projected maintenance costs for fiscal year 1988/89. These projected costs are used to determine the assessment rate necessary to provide the highest quality of landscaping at the bwest possible assessment. Assessments are used to furnish services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of parkways and park improvements. Maintenance of this disiriG is considered of general benefit to all areas within the district and costs shall be divided as indicated in this report. Detailed maintenance activities inGude the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of tho landscaping, inGuding cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury: the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and othef solid waste, file maintenance, repair and graffiti removal from walls immediatety adjacent to the cultivated areas. Park and parkway improvements within Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 were constructed by the developers of the individual subdivisions. The plans and parkways era as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Divison. FISCAL YEAR 1987!88 REVIEW A major reconstruction project on Victoria Park Lane was undertaken during fiscal year 1987/88. To fund this project monies from the City Beautifbation Fund were banad to the District to be paid back over the next five years. Water sensors were installed in Windrows Park and the district has realized a considerable savings in water. Genera! parkway main- tenan~ ihruuyiwui lire disirict was routine with ra mapr expenditures to date. A contingency account was established to provide funds for replacement of trees lost due to major storms or other disasters. This year $1,000 was transferred into the contingency account and additional funds will be added during 1988/89. ~3y 87/88 )~ AS OF 02/29/88 PRQIECIFD 8/30/88 Assessment Admin. $16,796 $9,064 $9,064 Payroll 27,414 8,863 8,863 Maint./Operations 69,594 4,734 20,000 Vehicle Maintenance 3,471 1,421 2,800 Contract Services 108,850 56,829 96,248 V'latc. 'S 000 35 099 54 X32 Electric Utilities 7,000 1,240 3,124 Irrig. Restoratbn 15,854 -0- -0- Park Maintenance 50,500 2,879 15,000 Renovation (Vic. Pk. Ln.) 470,000' 777,102 810,000 Tree Removal 20,000 23 20,000 Contingency (Trees) t.o00 875,263 897,045 1,039,530 'Additional $260,00 funded from Beautlficafbn During fiscal year 1987/88 parcel originalhy assessed as vacant land were devebped. The tracts and number of units are as folbws: Tract 13279 13 S,F. Tract 13443 148 S.F. Tract 13444 179 S.F. Tract 13440 114 S.F. Tract 13441 115 S.F. Tract 13442 153 S.F. /3S FISCAL YEAR /988189 The projected expenditures for fiscal year 1988/89 provide for continued maintenance of parkways and parks. The onty capital expend8ures proposed are for a storage building in the park, mow strips and tot bt retaining wall. The district ranrwt handle any more debt therefore loans will not be an acceptable form of payment for capital improvement projects. New accounts to be established include tree maintenance, additbnal funds for tree replacements (due ,o s ~ ^s) a;td the `rsf year rapay-sr, of funds warsd ;o ;hs dis;rci for .";cta ~a Park Lars renovation. PROJECTED 1988/89 EXPENDITURES Assessment Administratbn 571,200 Maintenance/Operatbns 32,000 Vehicle MaintJOperatbns 10,604 General Liability 3,000 Contract Services 150,000 Capital Expenditures 25,000 Water 105,000 Electric Utilities 13,000 Pa# Maintenancs 150,000 Tree MaintJContract Admin. 10,000 Contingency (Tree Replacemenq 9,000 Lnan Reoavment 92.OGD $607,804 Projected Revenue - 1988/89 It is estimated there will be 2925 assessment units and approximately 827 acres to be assessed as vacant land. After review of expenditures, assessment receipts, possible carry over funds ($200,000) and projected costs, the assessment rate for Fiscal Year 1988/89 will remain at $795.00/unit. 2925 K $195 $570,375 821 acres X 48.75 - 40,023 Assessment receipts are not received until efler December 70. The estimated carryover funds will be used to fund the dislrict maintenance until January. /3L LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (Hyssop (A) b Commerciellinduatrlel (B) ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT Fiscal Year 1989/89 The 1988/89 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No- 3 (Hyssop and Commer- cia'I/industriai) is prepared in eompiianoe with the requirements of Ariicie c, Ghapier i, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). This report provides informmbn outlining actual maintenance costs for Zone A (Hyssop) for 1987/88 and projected costs for fiscal year 1988/89 for both Zone A {Hyssop) and Zone B (Commercial/Industrial). The projected costs are used to establish the necessary assessment rate to provide the highest quality landscaping while maintaining or bwering assessments. Specifically, assessments will be used to furnish services and materials for the maintenance, operation, servicing and restoratbn of parkways and median islands within this distdd. The maintenance of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 (A) is considered of general benefit to all parcels within Zone A and the maintenance or Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 (B) is considered of general benefit to all areas with Zone S and tlSe costs shall l>e divided as Indicated in this report. Detailed maintenance activities in~ude She repair, removal cr replacement of all or any pa:! o! any improvement, providing for the life, growth, healtA and beauty of the landscaping, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, n.1J.ieA deh.lc end mho nIW vocre the elmm~ _ and n.~(riri mmnvol bnm wvllc immediately edjacenf to the cultivated areasm ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ - ~ ~ - - -~ ~ .~ Parkway improvements within Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 (A) were constructed by ;he developers of the Indivklual projects. Median Island improvements within Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 IB) were constructed by deveopers anrVor City contract. The plans for parkways and median islands improvements are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering DNisbn. FISCAL YEAR 1997/88 REVIEW iAmmm~onre rinrinn the rnrmm iienor v • hee i,een inr 7nne d nniv The moimenonro hoe loon normal and routine. Zone B was not assessed during fiscal year 1987!89 because there was no area to be maintained. /3~ ZONEA: 87/88 )[ AS OF 02/29!88 PROJECTED 6/30/88 Assessment Admin. E276 $32 S32 Payroll 380 -0- -0- Maint./Operations 1,302 30 30 Vehicle Maintenance 60 -0- -0- Contracl Snrvirxs 63v 993 i,49 i Water 1,055 509 1,004 Electric 69 270' 75 Irrig. Restoration ~~ _~ -9- 5,592 1,Ti4 2,602 During fiscal year 1987/88 the following projects were annexed to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 -Zone 8 (CommerciaVlndustrial) Annexaton 1 C.U.P. 85-OS 4.5 acres DR 84-49 75.0 acres DR 85-34 2.2 apes DR 85-38 4.9 apes DR 85-39 1.9 apes DR 85-45 7.0 saes DR 86.15 1.0 scre DR 86-16 .9 ape P.M. 5086 1.7 apes P IJ S! S9 1 1 urvuc P.M. 8901 2.5 apes P.M. 9144 14.8 apes P. M. 9409 3.0 acres P.M. 9498 37.8 apes P.M. 9508 2.3 apes P.M. 9670 32.6 apes P.M. 9687 9.2 acres P.M. 9896 34,9 apes P.M. 9897 11.1 apes P.M. 9955 14.4 acres P.M. 9972 21.9 apes P.M. 10007 16.0 acres P.M. 10223 4.2 apes / ei iiri~ i Sk k mroe P,M. 10368 4.5 acres Annexation No. 2 DR 86-33 1.0 acre 2 /3S Annexation No. 3 DR 86-22 2.2 acres Annexation No. 4 MDR 87.05 1.1 acre Annexaton No. 5 P.M. 10696 39.4 acres DR 87-02 9.5 aces P.M. 10444 12.7 acres DR 3532 16.0' acres DR 85-48 18.4 acres Annexation No. 6 DR 87-Ot 6.5 acres Annexation No. 7 DR 86-21 2.6 acres Annexation No. B DR 86-14 1.0 acre DR 86-36 40.7 acres Annexaton No. 9 DR 86-42 15.2 acres Annexation No. 10 DR 87-22 19.1 saes C.U.P. 85-37 1.0 acre Annexalion No. ?? DR 86-39 1.0 acre Annexaton No. 12 P.M. 10617 16.9 acres IlR AZDt F ~ urro< DR 87-15 1.6 BaeS DR 87-09 17.4 acres MDR 66-24 9.5 acres Annexation No. 13 DR 87-OS 1.0 acre GU.P a7-07 1.3 acres Annexation No. 14 P.M. 11236 3.0 acres Annexation No. 15 DR 87-24 18.8 saes Annexation No. 16 DR 87-31 7.3 acres 3 ~~/ FISCAL YEAR 188@l89 For fiscal year 1988/89 two separate budgets were prepared, one for Zone A (Hyssop) and Zone B {CommerciaVlndustrial). The Hyssop zone is a small area of eight (8) parcels that continues as originally tanned. There is no change anticipated for this portion of Distriil No. 3. All parcel within Zone B will be assessed on a net acre basis for the maintenance of landscaped medial islands on Haven Avenue from 4th Street to Deer Creek Channel, Foothill Boulevard and 4th Street from west to east City limits, Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue from 4th to Foothill Boulevard, "07 SGeei frcm Haver Avenue to Roctester Avenue and other medlar, islands on major divided highways within the Industrial Specifb Plan Area and Foothill Boulevard overlay area. For fiscal year ?988/89 the median island on Haven Avenue will be maintained from 4th Street to Daer Creek Channel. PROJECTED 7988189 EXPENDITURES Zone A (Hyssop) Assessment Administratbn S 32 Maint./Operations 50 Vehcle Maint. 750 Contrail Services 900 water soo Electric Utilities 100 Contingency (Trees) 75 2,807 Zone B (Haven Median ~ 4th to Deer Creek) Assessment Administratbn 488 Maint./Operations 4,151 Vehicle Maint. 2,208 Contract Servces 15,276 Water 950 Electric Utilities 100 Cantingency (Trees) 2,000 25,173 ~ ~O Projected Revenue - 1988/89 Zone A: This zone did not change in size or number of parcel. ANer review of expenditures, assessment receipts, and projected costs, the assessment rate for 1988/89 will remain at $258.75 per parcel. 8 X $258.78 = $2,070 Zone B: Zone B will be assessed on an acreage basis. Aftar review of Me projected costs for fiscal year 1988/89 it was determined that the assessment rate for Zone B will be $45.OU per acres. This will provide enough funds for existing median landscaping aM possible additional expenses. 608.3 acres X $45.00 =527,374 // LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT Fiscal Year 1988/89 The 1988/89 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vistaj is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Artb~e 4, Chapter 1, DNlsbn 5 of the Streets and Highways Ccda, State cf Calla la (Lards:.apa a~,d Lyh!6~g A~ c! 197.'). This report provides information outlining actual maintenance costs ar 1987/88 and projected costs for fiscal year 1988/89. The projected costs are used to establish the necessary assessment rate to provide the highest quality landscaping while maintaining or lowering assessments. Specifically, assessments will be used to famish services and materials for the malntenance, operation, servbing and restoratbn of parkways and parks wflhin this district. The maintenance of Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 is considered of general benefit to all areas in the district end file cost Shall lie divided as indicated in this report. Detailed malntenance activities InGude the repair, removal or replacement of ell or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the malntenance, repair and greffitl removal from walls Immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Park and parkway improvements within Landscape Maintenance Diatrbt No. 4 were constructed by the devabpers of the individual subdNisions. The plans and parkways ere as sfipulated in 1hn rnrWifinne nl annrcwal fnr earn dlweloornent end as aooroved W thB EndlnBBrirq Division. FISCAL YEAR 1987!88 REVIEW Maintenance during the current fiscal year has continued to be normal except for the Toss of trees during the major wind storm. Funds were available to replace the bst trees and in and eNoA to provide sufficient funds for loss of trees due to storms a contingency fund has been es- tablished. Funds in the amount of $1,000 was transferred Into the contingency account this year. Each year additional monies will be budgeted to this account to insure sufficient funds In cases of major storms or disasters. / 7 CT 87/88 AS OF PFl011EC.f® )~jQ 02/29/88 fj 30/ /88 Assessment Admin. $5,115 $4,780 $4,780 Payroll 9,871 2,849 2,849 Mainz./Operations 30,251 3,374 15,100 Vehicle Mainz. 1,556 574 1,300 Contract Services 35,986 18,025 27,037 NfBtcr " 5J0 ~~ 4.805 '0,200 Electric Utilities 700 198 380 Irrig. Restoration 13,100 -0- -0- Park Maintenance 18;400 4,589 10,876 Rochester Beaut. 103,000 -0- -0- Contingency (Trees) 500 -0- -0- 240,979 39,192 72,502 During the current fiscal year the folbwing tracts were annexed to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4: Annexaton No. 6 Annexation No. 7 P.M. 9504 - 0 - Tract 12671-1 31 S.F. Tract 12671-2 42 S.F. Tract 12671-3 28 S.F. Tract 12671-4 34 S.F. /U3 FISCAL YEAR 1989/89 The main area of increase for fiscal year 1988/89 will be the increase in park maintenance. Capital expenditures within the parks for storage buildings, planters, and mow strips will also be budgeted. The contingency aaount for free replacement due to storms or disasters will he added to in an akempt to establish sufficient funds if needed. PROJECTED 1988/99 EXPENDITURES Assessment Administration $7,440 Maint./Operations 7,000 Vehicle Maint./Operatons 8,797 General Liability 1,700 Contract Services 65,000 Capital Expenditures 50,000 Water 40,000 Electric Utilities 1,000 Park Maintenance 100,000 Tree Maint./Contract Admin. 10,000 Conlingenry (Tree Rep!aceme.^.!) 5,750 296,887 Projected Revenue - 1988/89 It is estimated there will be 1880 assessment units within this district during 1988/89. Aker review of expenditures, assessment receipts, possible carryover funds ($298,000) and projected costs, the assessment rata for Fiscal Vear 1988/89 will remain at $105,00/assess- ment unit. 1849 X $105 m $194,145 Carryover ~ $298,000 Acceccmant rarainic era nni raraivari „niii agar iraramiwr iii A mriinn of ina neiimaiari carryover funds will be used for district maintenance until January and the remainder will be combined with assessment receipts to Tund the proposed expendkure, 7'P LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 (Tot Lot) ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT Flseal Vear 1999/89 The 1988/89 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot) is prepared in comriance ~ai:h ;he reyui: e;aaa:s ^f Ar:icia 4, Chapter 1, Dvisio~, 5 of .;.a Streets an~'. Hghways Code, State of Caliromia (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. This report provides information outlining actual maintenance costs for 1987/88 and projected costs for fiscal year 1988!89. The projected costs are used to establish the necessary assessment rate to provide the highest quality landscaping while maintaining or lowering assessments. Specifically, assessments will be used ro furnish services and materials for the maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of parkways and the tot lot within this district. The maintenance of Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 is considered of general benefit to all areas in the district and the cost shall be divided as indksted in this report. Detailed maintenance activities induda the repair, removal or replacement of ail or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or Injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair end graffiti removal hom walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Parkway and tot lot improvements within tandscape Maintenance District No. 5 were wn• structed by the deveboers of the individual subdivision. The plans and oarkwevs are as stipulated in the conditbns of approval for each devebpment and as approved by the Engineering Division. FISCAL YEAR 1987/88 REVIEW /,t the beginning of the current fiscal year a reevaluation of the exact areas to be maintained was done. Along with the tot lot a small portion of the perimeter landscaping was to be maintained by this district. The dollars expended over the original budgeted amount for 1987/98 is due to this redesignation of area. Maintenance of the areas was normal and there are no changes expected. l~~ 87/88 AS fJF PRCdECTED l~lQS~EL 02/29/88 8/30/88 Assessment Admin. $297 $176 $178 MaintJOperations 116 30 Sg Contrail Services 1,384 1,321 1,981 Water 75 120 181 Electric Utilities 28 68 g7 twig. Restoration 1,375 -0- .g. General Maint. 1.588 -n- ~ 4,860 1,705 _ 2,475 There were no annezatbns to this district dudng the current fiscal. The dLstrict was es- tablished with the 44 units within the tract and there are rw plans to expand the disMil. FISCAL YEAR 1989/89 The main area of change in the projected costs for this district will bB for contrail services. The increase is due to the addhbn of a poribn of the perimeter lardscapirrg. Anew account will also be established b fund monies to ba used br the care and maintenance of trees in an a8emq to provide healthier and nicer trees. PROJECTED 1989/89 EXPENDITURES Assessment Administration 51 76 Mainl./Operations 100 weiiicie iNemt. ip General Liability 35 Contract Services 2,424 Water 941 Electric Utilities 100 Tree MaintJConiraet Admin. 400 4,186 Projected Revenue - 1988/89 This district will continue to contain the original 44 units. Attar review of expenditures, assessment receipts, possible carryover ($12,000) and projected costs, the assessment rate for Fiscal Vear 1988/89 will bo lowered by st.g0 to $11n,Og, 44 X $110.00 - $4,480 Assessment receipts are not received until after December 10. The estimated carryover lands will be used to fund the district mainlenanca until January. / ~"~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT Fiscal Year 1968/69 The 1988/89 annual report for Landscape Maintenance Distdct No. 8 (Caryn Planned Com- munity) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 0! :ha S:raais and Higt~•ays Ccde, State of Catifomia ^ar~scaps ark ;.~Mi.^.g Act o! 1972;. This report provides information outlining actual maintenance costs for 1987/88 and projected costs for fiscal year 1988/89. The projected costs are used to establish the necessary assessment rate to provide the highest quality landscaping while maintaining or lowering assessments. Specifically, assessments will be used to furnish services and materials tot the maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of parkways within this district. The maintenance of Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 is considered of general benefit to all areas in the district and the cost shall he divided as indicated in this report. Detailed maintenance activities include the repaiG removal or replacement of all or any pars of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury; the removal of tdmmings, rubbish, tlebds and other sol'W waste, the maintenance, repair and graffiti removal hom walls immediatety adjacent to the cultivated areas. Parkway improvements within Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 were constructed by the devebpers of the intlividual subdivisions. The plans and parkways are as stipulated in the mnditinnc of anorovai for each deveboment aM as aooroved W the Enoineering Division. FISCAL YEAR 1987/88 REVIEW This landscape district has only experienced minor expenditures during the current fiscal year. Maintenance of parkways was not assumed u ntil late in the year because of major problems with the establishment of the landscaped areas. Ciry staff required many areas to be replanted to insure quality of landscaping. 87/88 ~ AS OF PfiCLIECTF~ 02/29/88 6/30/68 Assessment Admin. $3,774 -0- $3,77 4 Malll{.%VUM/Mt1t111'i I.M6g M -V- jW Contract Services 50,000 -0- 10,000 Water 20,000 -0- 4,500 Electric Utilities 1,500 -0- 150 General Maint. 7.000 -0- ~_ 77,754 -0- 19,124 ~T~ During the current fiscal year the folbwing tracts were annexed to Landscape Maintenance District No. 6: ANNEXATION N0.2 Tract No. 13557 30 S.F. Tract No. 13559 74 S.F. Trail No. 13562 63 S.F. FISCAL YEAR 1988/89 Fiscal year 1988/89 will realize a major increase in maintenance costs due to the large amount of parkways that will be accepted for maintenatce. The acceptance of parkway maintenance was delayed due to problems with plants and materials during the establishment period. Many areas were required to be replanted and reestablished prior to the district assuming maintenance. New accounts will be established for tree maintenance and a contingency account for tree replacement due to storms or disaster type shuatbns. PROJECTED 1988/99 EXPENDITURES Assessment Administratbn $1,896 Mainr,/Operations 10,800 Vehicle Maint.!Operetbns 1,099 Contract Services 40,000 Water 30,000 Flartrir. I ItiBtiaa; 2.000 Tree MaintJContract Admin. 1,500 Contingency (Trees) 2,000 89,295 Projected Revenue - 1988/89 It is estimated there will be 474 assessment units within this district during 1988/89. After review of possible expenditures, assessment receipts, possible carryover ($80,000) and projected costs, the assessment rate for Fiscal Year 1988/89 will rem2in at $795.00. After fiscal year 1988/89 a better analysis of ousts can be made. 474 X $195.00 m $92,430 Assessment receipts are not receMed until after December 10. The estimated carryover funds will be used to fund the district maintenance until January. 2 /y8 RESOLOTION NO. ~f ~ ~h RANCHO A RESOLUTION 08 THS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 6 RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City clerk of the city an annual report in writing for which zssessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and/or improvement of said Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the city Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, reaui res or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered as follows: 1. That the Engineer's Estimate of itemized costs and expenses of said werk and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 2. That the diagrams showing the Assessment Districts referred to an described ir. said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment Districts are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. ar rno_ oa -. _ ~,,,,,.,,,,. upon -_ _ns of land inYsaid Assessment~Dist riots •in~proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the irc idental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. I~~ That said report sha11 stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the Fiscal year 1988/89 for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings. ]ANNWIL 1\S989SMBNT R11T8S i~85/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 Landscape uiscricc #i 538.00 528.00 525.50 525.uu (General City) Landscape District #7_ 223.77 223.77 195.00 195.00 (Victoria) Landscape District #3A -0- 258.75 258.75 258.75 (Hyssop) Landscape District #3B -0- -0- -0- 95.00 (Medians) Landscape District #4 154.10 128.34 105.00 105.00 (Terra vista) Landscape District #5 163.64 113.91 111.00 110.00 (met Lo*_) Landscape District #6 -0- -0- 195.00 195.00 (Caryn) LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE D28TRI CT NO. 1 (General City) ANNOAL ENGINEER'S REPORT Fiscal Year 1988/89 The 1988/89 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 9, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). This report provides information outlining actual maintenance costs for 1987/88 and projected costs for fiscal year 1988/89. The projected costs are used to establish the necessary assessment rate to provide the highest quality landscaping while maintaining or lowering assessments. Specifically, assessments will be used to furnish services and materials for the maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of parkways within this district. The maintenance of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 is considered of general benefit to all areas in the district and the cost shall be divided as indicated in this report. Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the ma ititenance, repair and graffiti removal from walls immediately aujaceu~ w ~i~e cui~ivn~eu aceaa. Parkway improvements within Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 were constructed by the developers of the individual subdivisions. The plans and parkways are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. FISCAL YEAR 1987/88 REVIEW Maintenance during the current fiscal year has been normal except for loss of trees during the wind storm. Funds were available to replace the damaged or lust trees in the Maintenance and Gpa-- --- -'-- - pr- - ayeGifiG fuiiu5 fJi the ceYaii Ji replacementaofVtrees and otherclandscaping due to a disaster type situation a Ccntingency account has been established with $1,000 being transferred into the account. Each year additional funds will be added to insure sufficient funds for trees, etc. due to storms. 87/88 H[iDpET AS OF 02/29/AA PROJECTED fi/30/8A Assessment Admin. $5,289 $21,536 $21,536 Payroll 5,695 2,229 2,229 Maint./Operations 18,964 630 10,000 Vehicle Maint. 898 -0- -0- Contract Services 31,019 13,873 20,809 Capital Expenditures 50,000 -0- 25,000 water zti,000 12,652 i9, 000 Electric Utilities 3,500 2,067 3,100 brig. Restoration 5,0e8 -0- 1,000 Entry Monuments 170,000 - 170,000 Contingency (Trees) I.DDD -o~ -n- 5317,388 552;982 $272,669 During the currenc fiscal year the following tracts were annexed to Landscape Maintenan ce District No. 1: Annexation 33 Tract 13118 102 S.F. Annexation 39 Tract 11997 19 S,F. Tract 12835 132 T.H. Tract 10296 15 S.F. DR 86-12 114 Apts. Annexation 35 Tract 11392 72 S.F. Tract 12577 16 S.F. Annexation 36 Tract 1.U 349 S/ S.P', Annexation 37 Tract 12690-3 50 S.F. Tract 11599-1 27 S.F. Anr~exa*_ion 38 Tract 13542-1 96 S.F. Tract 13975 29 S.F, Tract 13353 15 Condos. Tract 10414 17 S.F, Annexation 39 (NO Development s Annexed - Onl y parkways) Annexation 90 Tract 12873 304 S.F. Annexation 41 DR 85-06 298 Ants. Annexation 42 Tract 13275 290 Condos. 2 rzsC~n sE7fR 1986/89 One area of concern with landscaped areas is water consumption. It is imp=native that efforts be made to conserve water due tc a possible water shortage but also to maintain the lowest possible water charges. The use of water sensor devices has proven to be a good investment. Monies will be budgeted for 1988/89 to implement a program for the installation of sensors in parkways within Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. Another new acccunt will be established t0 budget TUnd3 IOr tree maintenance. The C'iCy Maintenance Section will begin during fiscal year 1988/89 to provide a complete tree maintenance program. Trees will be inventoried, monitored, and pruned to provide healthy trees, not just trees that are pruned every few years. PROJECTED 1988/89 Assessment Administration $29,516 Maintenance/Operations 26,771 Vehicle Maint./Operations 6,466 General Liability 905 Contract Services 39,392 Capital Expenditures (Sensors) 20,000 Water 35,000 Electric Utilities 5,000 Tree Maint./Contract Admin. 16,425 Contingency (Tree Replacement) 5,000 189,975 Project ed Revenue - 1988/89 It is estimated there will be 7379 assessment units within this district during 1988/89. After review of expenditures, assessment receipts, possible carryover funds ($113,000) and projected costs, the assessment rate for Fiscal Year 1988/89 can be lowered by .50 to $25.00/unit. 7379 X $25.00 $184,975 Assessment rCCelpCS dre noC IECeiVed Unt 11 diter DOCembeT !0. Trio estimated carryover funds will be used to fund the district maintenance until January. I,ANDSCaPB MAZNT8N11NC8 DISTRICT NO. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) ANNOIIL 8NGIN&SR'S R8PORT Fiaeal Yaaz 1988/89 The annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 9, Chapter i, Division 5 of ti[e Streeis and riiyi[ways Cuue, Slate of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). This report deals with the actual maintenance costs for fiscal year 1987/00 and the projected maintenance costs for fiscal year 1988/89. These projected costs are used to determine the assessment rate necessary to provide the highest quality of landscaping at the lowest possible assessment. Assessments are used to furnish services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of parkways and park improvements. Maintenance of this district is considered of general benefit to all areas within the district and costs shall be divided as indicated in this report. Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for aisease or rn~uzy; me removal ox rrimminy, runnisu, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and graffiti removal from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Park and parkway improvements within Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 were constructed by the developers of the individual subdivisions. The plans and parkways are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. FISCAL YEAH 1987/88 R&VISW A major reconstruction project on Victoria Park Lane was undertaken during fiscal year 1987/88. To fund this project monies from the City Beautification Fund were loaned to the District to be paid back over the next five years. Water sensors were installed in Windrows Park and the district has realized a considerable savings in water. General parkway maintenance tnrougnout the district was routine with no major expenditures to date. A contingency account was established to provide funds for replacement of trees lost due to major storms or other disasters. This year 51,000 was transferred into the contingency account and additional funds will be added during 1988/89. 87/88 gj]pGET AS OF 02729:88 PROJECTED (,/30/88 Assessment Admin. 516,796 59,069 59,069 Payroll 27,419 8,663 8,663 Maint./Operations 69,599 9,734 20,000 Vehicle Maintenance 3,471 1,421 2,800 Contract Services 108,850 56,829 96,298 Water 75,000 35,089 54,632 Electric Utilities 7,000 1,290 3,124 Irrig. Restoration 15,859 -G- -0- Park Maintenance 50,500 2,879 15,000 Renovation (Vic. Pk. Ln.) 9'/U,000* 11/,1U2 81u,uuu Tree Removal 20,000 23 20,000 Contingency (Trees) 1.000 875,263 897,095 1,039,530 *Additional $260,00 funded from Reautificatinn During fiscal year 1987/88 parcel originally assessed as vacant land were developed. The tracts and number of units are as follows: Tract 13279 13 S.F. Tract 13443 148 S.F. Tract 13994 179 S.F. •rract 13990 ii9 9.F'. Tract 13441 115 S.F. Tract 13492 153 S.F. FISCAL YB11R 1988/89 The projected expenditures for fiscal year 1988/89 provide for continued maintenance of parkways and parks. The only capital expenditures proposed are for a storage building in the park, mow strips and tot lot retaining wall. The district cannot handle any more debt, therefore loans will not be an acceptable form of payment for capital improvement projects. :7ew accounts to be establisnea include tree maintenance, additional funds for tree replacements (due to storms) and the first year repayment of funds loaned to the district for Victoria Fark Lane renovation. PROJECTED 1988/89 E%PENDITOAES Assessment Administration $11,200 Maintenance/Operations 32,000 Vehicle Maint./Operations 10,609 General Liability 3,000 Contract Services 150,000 Capital Expenditures 25,000 water 105,000 Electric Utilities 13,000 Park Maintenance 150;000 Tree Maint./Contract Admin. 10,000 Contingency (Tree Replacement) 9,000 Loan Repayment 92,000 $607,804 Projected Revenue - 1988/89 It is estimated there will be 2925 assessment units and approximately 821 acres to be assessed as vacant land. After review of expenditures, assessment receipts, possible carry over funds ($200, OOU) and projected costs, the assessment rate for Fiscal Year 1988/89 will remain at 5195.00/unit. 2925 X 5195 = $570,375 821 acres X 48.75 = 90,023 Assessment receipts are not received until aitei UCCember lU. Tne estimated carryover funds will be used to fund the district maintenance until January. I.1\liD8C11PE N11IET8E11DiCE DISTRICT RO. 3 (8yaaop (A) i Commercial/Iadvatrial (8) 71t7NO11L ENGIIiEER' 9 REPORT Fiacal Yeaz 1988/89 The 1988/89 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 (Hyssop and Commercial/Industrial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter i, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). This report provides information outlining actual maintenance costs for Zone A !Hyssop) for 1987/88 and projected costs for fiscal year 1988/89 for both Zone A (Hyssop) and Zone B (Commercial/Industrial). The projected costs are used to establish the necessary assessment rate to provide the highest quality landscaping while maintaining or lowering assessments. Specifically, assessments will be used to furnish services and materials for the maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of parkways and median islands within, this district. The maintenance of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 (A) is considered of general benefit to all parcels within Zone A and the maintenance of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 (B) is rnnsidered of general benefit to all areas with Zone B and the costs shall be divided as indicated in this report. Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of alt or any part of. any Improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and graffiti removal from walls immediately adjacent to the cu ltivated areas. Parkway improvements within Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 (A) were constructed by the developers of the individual projects. Median island improvements within Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 (B) were constructed by developers and/or City contract. The plans for parkways and median islands improvements are as stipulated .in the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. rxscar. Bran 19a7/ae navxaw Maintenance during the current fiscal year has been for Zone A only. The maintenance has been normal and routine. Zone B was not assessed during fiscal year 1987/88 because there was no area to be maintained. ZONE A: 87/88 $~EZ AS 02/29/ OF PROJECTED 88 6/30/88 Assessment Admin. 5276 832 832 Payroll 380 -0- -0- Maint./Operations 1,302 30 30 Vehicle Maintenance 60 -0- -0- Contract Services 830 993 1,991 Water 1,055 509 1,004 Electric 69 210* 75 brig. ReStOration L,G20_ -fL ~_ 5,592 1,779 2,602 Dozing fiscal year 1987/88 the following projec ts were annexed to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 - Zone 8 (Commercial/Industrial) Annexation 1 C.O.P. 85-05 9.5 acres UR 89-49 75.0 acres DR 85-39 2.2 acres DR 85-38 9.9 acres DR 85-39 1.9 acres DR 95-45 7.0 acres DR 86-15 1.0 acre DR 86-16 .9 acre P.M. 5086 1.7 acres P.M. 5157 1.7. acres P.M. 8901 2.5 acres P.M. 9144 19.8 acres P.M. 9909 3.0 acres P.M. 9998 37.8 acres o _rn o5na 2,3 ar~rca P.M. 9670 32.6 acres P.M. 9687 9.2 acres P.M. 9896 34.9 acres P.M. 9897 11.1 acres P.M. 9955 14.4 acres P.M. 9972 21.9 acres 2 P.M. 10007 16.0 acres P .M, 10223 9.2 acres P .M, 10237 58.8 acres P .M. 10366 9.5 acres Annexation No. 2 DR 86-33 1.0 acre Annexation No. 3 DR 86-22 2,2 acres Annexation No. 4 MDR 87-OS 1.1 acne Annexation No. 5 P.M. 10696 39.9 acres DR 87-02 9.5 acres P.M. 10999 12.7 acres DR 85-52 18.8 arses DR 85-98 18.4 acres Annexation No. 6 DR 87-01 6.5 acres Annexation No. 7 DR 86-21 2.6 acres Annexation No. 8 DR 86-19 1.0 acre DR 86-36 90.7 acres Annexation No. 9 DR 86-42 15.2 acres Annexation No. 10 DR 87-22 19.1 acres C.U.P. 85-37 1.0 acre Annexation No. 11 DR 06-39 1.0 acre Annexation No. 12 P.M. 10617 16.9 acres DR 87-21 6.3 acres DR 87-15 1.6 acres CR 87-09 17.4 acres MDR 86-24 9.5 acres Annexation No. 13 DR B7-OS 1.U acre C.U.P 87-07 1.3 acres Annexation No. 14 P.M. 11236 3.0 acres Annexation ::o. 15 DR 8~-29 18.8 acres Annexation No. 16 DR 87-31 7.3 acres 3 8I8C11L YY11R 1988/89 For fiscal year 1988/89 two separate budgets were prepared, one for Zone A (Hyssop) and Zone B (Commercial/Industrial). The Hyssop zone is a small area of eight IB) parcels that continues as originally formed. There is no change anticipated for this portion of District No. 3. All parcel within Zone B will be assessed on a net acre basis for the maintenance of landscaped medial islands on Haven Avenue from 4th Street to Deer Creek Channel, Foothill Boulevard and 9th Street from west to east Cfty limits, Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue from 9th to Foothill Boulevard, 6th Street from Haven Avenue tc Rochester Avenue and other median islands on major divided highways within the Industrial Speci f.ic Plan Area and Foothill Boulevard overlay area. For fiscal year 1988/89 the median island on Haven Avenue will be maintained from 4th Street to Deer Creek Channel. PROJECTED 1988/89 Zone A (Hyssop) AssessmentAdministration 532 Maint./Operations 50 Vehicle Mairt. 750 Contract Services 900 Water 900 Electric Utilities 700 Contingency (Trees) 75 2,807 Zone B (Haven Median - 4th to Deer Creek) Assessment Administration 488 Maint./Operations 4,151 Vehicle Maint. 2,208 Cont rar_t Services 15,276 Water 950 Electric U[ilit ies 100 Contingency (Trees) 2,000 25,173 Projected F.evenue - 1988/89 Zone A: This zone did noC change in size or number of parcel. After review of expenditures, assessment receipts, and projected costs, the assessment rate for 1988189 will remain at $258.75 per parcel. 8 X S258.75 = 52,070 Zone B: Zone a will be assessed on an acreage basis. After review of the projected costs for fiscal year 1988/89 it was determined that the assessment rate for Zone B will be $45.00 per acres. This will provide enough funds for existing median landscaping and possible additional expenses. 608.3 acres X $95.00 = 527,374 5 LANDSCAPB MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 (Terra Vista Plaaaed Community) ANNUAL EN6IN88R'S RBPORT Fiacal Year 1983/89 The 1988/89 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Terra Vista) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 9, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, Scare of California iLandscape and Lighting Act of i9i2j. This report provides information outlining actual maintenance costs for 1987/88 and projected costs for fiscal year 1988/89. The projected costs are used to establish the necessary assessment rate to provide the highest quality landscaping while maintaining or lowering assessments. Specifically, assessments will be used to furnish services and materials for the maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of parkways and parks within this district. The maintenance of Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 is considered of general benefit to all areas in the district and the cost shall be divided as indicated in this report. Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, trimming, spraying, fert.ilizina or treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and graffiti removal from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Park and parkway improvements within Landscape Maintenance District No. A were constructed by the developers of. the individual subtlivisicns. The plans and parkways are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. SISCAL YEAR 1937/33 REVIEFI Maintenance during the current fiscal year has continued to be normal except for the loss of trees during the major wind storm. Funds were available to replace the lost trees and in and effort to provide sufficient funds for loss of trees due to storms a contingency fund has been established. Funds in the amount of 51.000 was transferred into r_he contingency account this year. each year additional monies will be budgeted to this account to insure sufficient funds in cases of major storms or disasters. 87/88 B[iDG .T AS OF 07 /79/RR PROJECTED 6:30/88 Assessment Admin. $5,115 $9,780 $9,780 Payroll 9,871 2,899 2,899 Maint./Operztions 30,251 3,379 15,100 Vehicle Maint. 1,556 579 1,300 Contract Services 35,986 18, G25 27,037 Water 22,500 9,805 1U,`L OD Electric Utilities 700 196 360 brig. Restoration 13,100 -0- -0- Park Maintenance 18,900 9,589 10,876 Rochester Beaut. 103,000 -0- -0- Contingency (Trees) 500 -0- -0- 29C,979 39,192 72,502 During the current fiscal year the following tracts were annexed to Landscape Maintenance District No. 9: Annexation No. 6 Annexation No. 7 P.M. 9509 -0- Tract 12671-1 31 S.F. Tract 12671-2 42 S.F. Tract 12671-3 28 S.F. Tract 12671-9 39 S.F. 2 FISCAL YEAR 1988/89 The main area of increase for fiscal year 1988/89 will be the increase in park maintenance. Capital expenditures within the parks for storage buildings, planters, and mow strips will also be budgeted. The contingency account for tree replacement due to storms or disasters will be added to in an attempt to establish sufficient funds if needed. PROJECTED 2988/89 EXPENDITDRES Assessment Administration 57,990 Maint./Operations 7,000 Vehicle Maint./Operations 8,797 General Liability 1,700 Contract Services 65,000 Capital Expenditures 50,000 hater 40,000 Electric Utilities 1,000 Park Maintenance 100,000 Tree Maint./Contract Admin. i0, 000 ...,ntinacncy (Tree °eplacement) 5,750 296, 687 Projected Revenue - 1988/69 It is estimated the re will be 1860 assessment units within r_his district during 1988;89. After review of expenditures, assessment receipts, possible carryover funds (5298,000) and projected costs, the assessment rate for Fiscal Year 1988/89 will remain at $105.00/assessment unit. 1899 X $105 = 5194,145 Carryover = 5298,000 no~oe~mcnt ntc ara n_nt rcraiva_d until aft P.r December 10. A ....., _.~_... _.._ Tcrcy. __ ___ portion of the estimated carryover funds will be used ror district maintenance until January and the remainder will be combined with assessment receipts Co fund the proposed expenditure. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 (Tot Lot) ANNDAL ENGINEER'S REPORT Racal Year 1988/89 The 1988/89 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 9, Chapter 1, Division 3 of the Streets and xignways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. This report provides information outlining actual maintenance costs for 1987/88 and projected costs for fiscal year 1988/89. The projected costs are used to establish the necessary assessment rate to provide the highest quality '_andscaping while maintaining or lowering assessments. Specifically, assessments will be used to furnish services and materials for the maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration o£ parkways and the tot lot within this district. The maintenance of Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 is considered of general benefit to all areas in the district and the cost shall be divided as indicated in this report. Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and graffiti removal from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Parkway and tot lot improvements within Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 were constructed by the developers of the individual subdivi s.ion. The plans and parkways are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. FISCAL REAR 1987/88 REVIEN At the beginning cf the current fiscal year a reevaluation of the exact areas to he mainta i.ned was done. Along with the tot lot a small Dort ion of the perimeter landscapina_ was to be maintained b_v tnis district. ~rhe dollars expended over the original budgeted amount for 1987/88 is due to this redesignation of area. Maintenance of the areas was normal and there are no changes expected. 87/88 AS OF PROJECTED BtlD(;FT 088 6/30!88 Assessment Admin. $297 5176 $176 Maint./Operations 116 30 50 Contract Services 1,389 1,321 1,981 Water 75 120 181 Electric Utilities 25 58 87 trria. Restoration 1,375 -0- -0- General Maint. 1.588 -0- -0- 9,860 1,705 2,475 There were no annexations to this district during the current fiscal. The district was established with the 94 units within the tract and there are no plans to expand the district. S ISCAL YEAR 1988/89 The main area of change in the projected costs for this district will be for contract services. The increase is due to the addition of a portion of the perimeter landscaping. Anew account wi 1.1 also be established to fund monies to be used for the care and maintenance of trees in an attempt to provide healthier and nicer trees. PROJECTED 1988/89 EXPENDITQAES AsCaASment Administration 5176 Maint./Operation 100 Vehicle Maint. 10 General Liability 35 Contract Services 2,924 Water 941 2iectric tilit ies 100 Tree Maint./Contract Admin. 900 Projected Revenue - 1988/89 9,166 This district will continue to contain the original 99 units. After review of expenditures, assessment receipts, possible carryover (5;2,000) and projected ccsts, the assessment rate for noo ,oo .,;>> .,.. ~,....,,...,,~ 1..~ ci nn t,. ciin nn 99 X $110.00 = 54,980 Assessment receipts are not received until after December 10. The estimated carryover funds will be used to fund the district maintenance until January. 2 LANDSCAPH HAINTENANCB DISTRICT NO. 6 (Cazyn Planned Community) ANNDAL BNOYN88R'8 RBPORT Fiacal Year 1988{89 The 1988/89 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 9, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). This report provides information outlining actual maintenance costs for 1987/89 and projected costs for fiscal year 1988/89. The projected costs are used to establish the necessary assessment rate to provide the highest quality landscaping while mairt aining or lowering assessments. Specifically, assessments will be used tc furnish services and materials for the maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of parkways within this district. The maintenance of Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 is considered of general benefit to all areas in the district and the cost shall be divided as indicated in this report. Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, trimming, spraying, fort i.L'zing e_r treating For disease or in iu ry; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and graffiti removal from walls immediately ad iacent to the cultivated areas. Parkway improvements within Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 were constructed by the developers of the individual subdivisions. The plans and parkways are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. FISCAL YEAR 1987/88 REWIEN This landscape district has only experienced minor expenditures during the current fiscal year. Maintenance of parkways was not assumed until late in the year because of major problems with the Aarahlichmanr of tha 7andscaoed areas. Ci[v staff required many areas to be replanted to insure quality of iandscaping. 87/88 EfIDGFT 00 /~ AS OF 88 PROJECTED 6/30/88 Assessment Admin. $3,779 -0- $3,779 Maint./Operations 1,980 -0- SOC Contract Services 50,000 -0- 10,000 Water 20,000 -0- 9,500 Electric Utilities 1,500 -C- 150 General Maint. 1.000 -0- 200 77,159 -0- i9,i29 During the current fiscal year the following tracts were annexed to Landscape Maintenance District No. 6: ANNEXATION NO. 2 Tract No, 13557 30 S.F. Tract No. 13559 74 S.F. Tract No. 13562 63 S.F. FISCAI~ YP.11R 1988/89 Fiscal year 1988/89 will realize a major increase in maintenance costs due to the large amount of parkways that will be accepted for maintenance, The acceptance of parkway maintenance was delayed due to problems with plants and materials during the establishment period. Many areas were required to be replanted and reestablished prior to the district assuming maintenance. New accounts will be established for tree maintenance and a contingency account for tree replacement due to storms or disaster type situations. PROJECTED 1988/89 EXYENDTTDRES Assessment Administrat ion $1,896 Maint./Operations 10,800 Vehicle Maint./Operations 1,099 Contract Services 90,000 Water 30,000 Electric Utilities 2,000 Tree Maint./Contract Admin. 1,500 Cnnt inaencv 1Treesl 2.000 89,295 Projected Revenue - 1988/89 2 It is estimated there will be 474 assessment units within this district during 1988/89. After review of possible expenditures, assessment receipts, possible carryover ($60,000) and projected costs, the assessment rate for Fiscal Year 1988/69 will remain at $195.00. After fiscal year 1988/89 a better analysis of costs can be made. 479 X $195,00 = $92,930 Assessment receipts are net received until after uecember ii.. the estimated carryover funds will be used to fund the district maintenance until Sanuary. RESOLUTION NO. ~$ - 0 740 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEdY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 6 FOR THE FISC4L YEAR 1988189 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 7972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO The Ciry Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisbns of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as lolbws: SECTION t: That the pudic interest and corwenience require and it is the intention of this Ciry Council b levy and collect assessments whhin Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 for the 8scai year 1988/89 for the maintenance and operation of those parkways, parks and facilities thereon dedicated for common greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivisbn tract map within the boundaries of said Distdcts. Said maintenance and operation includes iha cost and supervision of parkway maintenance (including sprinkler systems, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting, structures antl walls, and related facilities) in connection with said districts. Cf:nTInN 7• Tho fnrenninn rlwv:riMr1 work is to tfe located within the fOadWOV rights-of-way and landscaping easements enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly describetl on maps which era on file in the City Clerk's Office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than bcal or ordinary pubib benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said distdcts are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which districts are described as folbws: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that Certain 'Map of Landscape Maimenance D(sidct No. 1", ^nxan ni i onncrann Maimcnanra fiicirini Nn 9' Man of i AitfL§ia3ae Mainfenanrdf Di>tik°~ fw. 3". ..._~ _. __..___T_ ..._...._.._. __ _ _ "Map of Landscape Maintenance Distrct fJo. 4', "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 5", and "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 6", Indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory Included within each assessment district and which maps are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. /y9 Cf TY COIINCI L RESOLUTION LANDSCAPE MAINi'F1JPl~'CE DISTRICTS May 4, 1988 Page 2 Reference is hereby made ro saki maps for further, full end more particular desaiptlon of said assessment districts, and iha said maps so on file shall govsm for all details as to the extent of said assessment districts. SECTION 4: Tho City council of said Ciry by Resolution No.' has approved the annual repon of the City Engineer which report indicates the amount of the proposed assess- msnts, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report line "Annual Engineer's Report" is on file in the Office of the Ciry Clerk of said Ciry. Reference fo said report is hereby made Ior all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION 5: Notice is hereby gNen that on Ste 1st day of June, 1988, at the hour of 7:30 p.m. in the Ciry CouncA Chambers in the Ciry of Rands Cucamonga, any and all persons may appear and show cause why saW work should not De done or carried out or why assessments should not he levied and COlleeted for flscaf year 1888/89. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property In which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must 6e delivered to the Ciry Clerk cf said Ctry prior is the lime set for the hearing, and no oMer protests or objed'rons will be consMered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll such protest must contain or be acoom- ymucti ~f „uo:, o.,w:,:... ,,,:., e...... elan . .~ :~.°. 7....~. ~~ ,w~ ~ ....nw.. .. An ri6nA SEGTION 6; All the work herein proposed Shall be done antl carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of Califomia designated as the Landscaping and Ughting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Califor- nia. SECTION 7: Published ratice shall be mad9 pursuant to Section 69fi1 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resoluton and the CIry Clerk shell attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to ba published 10 days bebre the date set fw the heaiii,g, di ieaai Gi .:v" T,i' a,iy nop0 ~ 'xq.ape: ^f y^a '^I C„t„ilat~n r%=1`hed :.^. ;.he Ciry of Ontario, California, and circulated in mepCity of Rancho Cucamonga, Callromla. /~ A830LUTION NO. ~~~/~~Kl A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COONCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPB MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 6 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ACT REARING 1988%89 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGRriNG OBJECTIONS THERETO OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TINE AND PLACE FOR The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: D~gtion of work RECTTON 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and coiled assessments within Landscape Ma ir~tenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 a.^.d 5 for the fiscal year 1988/89 for the maintenance and operation of those parkways, parks and facilities thereon dedicated for common greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivi.s ion tract map within the boundaries of said Districts. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervisron of parkway maintenance (including sprinkler systems, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting, structures and walls, and related facilities) in connection with said districts. *~~arinn of Werk s .F_ Tom: The foregoing described work is to be located within the roadway rights-of-way and landscaping easements enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the City Clerk's Office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. nacrrint inn of Assessment Districts $~,T ION 3: Tha*_ L'he contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Courc it hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said districts are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which districts are described as follows: CITY COUNCZL RESOLUTION LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS May A, 1988 Page 2 All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 2", Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 9", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 5", and "Map of Landscape Maintenance Uistrict No. e", indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within each assessment district and which maps are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more particular description of said assessment districts, and the said maps so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment districts. SECTION 4: The City council of said City by Resolution No. * has approved the annual report of the City Engineer which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report title "Annual Engineer's Report" is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount ane extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. Time and vlare of Hea~'na SFCTInN 5; Notice is hereby given that cn the 1st day of June, 1988, at the hour of 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons may appear and show cause why saitl work shou Ld not be done or carried out or why assessments should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 1988/83. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, _nd n nrher .,roresrs nc nhiert inns will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll such protest must contair. or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS May 9, 1988 Page 3 S ..T TON 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Caiifo nii a. SF.f TION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6961 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ----- CITY OF RANCHO CI'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE; May 4, 1988 T4 Mayor and Members of Ne City Council FROM: Robert A. Riuo, Assistant City Manager BY: Jerry B. Fulwood, Resource Center Coordinator sf. ~' - ,i SUBJECT: APPE01lAL OF PRELIMINARYENGINEEfi&REPQATS_AN2SEITINSiA~u911C Staff recommends that Ciry Council adopt the attached Resolutions giving preliminary approval of City Engineer's Reports and decladng its intanticn to levy and collect assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 for Fiscal Vear 1988/89 and o8ering a time and place for hearing objectbns thereto. Pursuant to the requirements of the Landscaping end Llghting Act of 1972 a preliminary encineer's mmrt tn. o~~ti u,.n~+~g ^_i.!rio' `cc `- ,-, y;cyu, o,i. n invinw or current year's activities is included as well as pro)ected expenditures for fiscal year 1988/879. lighting Districts Nos. 1 and 5 assessments are proposed to remain unchanged. Lighting districts Nos. 2, 3, and 4 will be lower than 7987/88. Fiscal year 7968/89 will be the first year assessments are collected for district No. 6. Redly sub fitted, Robert A. Ria~~~~ Assistant City Manager RAR:JBF:sgr Attachments: Annual Assessment Rates Engineer's Reports (8) Resolutions (2) /~/ RESOLUTION NO. ~ '~ 7/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, S AND 6 RESOLVED r»' the Ciry Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighgng Act of 1972, the Ciry Engineer is required to make and file wits the City Gerk of the city an annual report In writing for which assessments are to be levied and colleWed to pay the costs of the maintenance aridior improve- ment of said Street L'ghting Maintenance DisMCts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. WHEREAS, the Ciry Engineer has made antl filed whh the city Clerk of said Ciry a repon in venting as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which has bean presented b this Council for consideratbn; and WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and every pan thereof, and finds that each and every part of saW report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any pan thereof, requires or shouts be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, ii is ordered as folbws: 1 . That the Erpineers Estimate of Itemized costs aM expenses of sell work and of the inddental expenses in connection therewhh, oontnined In said romA ha anA waMi of them are harabv oretiminarily aooroved end con- firmed. 2. That the diagrams showing the Assessment Districts referred to an described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within Bald Assessment Districts are hereby preliminarily approved and con- firmed. 3. That the proposed assessments upon the subdivisons of land in said Assessment Distrkts in proportbn to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivisbn, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses ihereef, as contained in said report is hereby preliminanly approved eM confirmed. 6 Thai caiA ramri ahaii danri a>; the %iiv Erlaineni a Arie¢ni ReeGrt far iha fiscal year 1986/89 for the purposes of all subsequent proceedirps. / ~3 ANNUAL ASSESSNYENT RATES Lighting District #1 1985/Bfi 8.91 (Arterial) Lighting District #2 36.22 (Local) Lighting District #3 48.65 (Victoria) Lighting District #4 27.14 (Terra Vista) Lighting District #5 -0- (Caryn) Lighting District #6 -0- 1988187 8.91 ]987/88 7.52 1988/89 7.52 31.23 25.00 23.00 48.03 35.00 27.00 32.21 25.00 25,00 -0- 35.00 35.00 -0- (COmmercizl/lnoustnat) wl -0- 25.00 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. Arterial Streets ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT Fiscal Year 1988/89 The annual capon for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (AAadal Streets) is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Anicle 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, Sieie vi Caiif0ioia (La^ndsCapir,g acid Lightng AG Gf 1372). This report deals with the projected costs for fiscal year 1987/88 and the projected expen- ditures for fiscal year 1988/89 to determine annua! assessments. The assessments will be used to furnish services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of street light improvements as provided by Southern California Edison Company. Maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and costs shall 6e divided as indicated in the body of this capon. Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area. Street lights were constructed and installed by iha devebpers for the individual subdivisions. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditbns of approval for each devekpment and as approved by the Engineering Divisbn. FISCAL YEAR 198%l88 REVIEW oan.iFrrFn errttel cA.ars 87/88 ~ AS OF 02/29/88 PFiCJECTED 6/30/88 Assessment Admin. $1,479 -0- $31,952 Payroll 2,716 6i6 616 Fringe Benefits 951 -0- -0- Maint./Operations 580 130 200 Capital Expend. 20,000 -0- •0- Electric Utilities 36 ooa ].9.943_ 22.415 60,726 15,869 55,183 rn ninn iionoi vnar iilkiikn ma __....a ... __. ,__. .-_..__ ..._ iniinwinn iracr< and ironic wwta annaxwi ._.._.....a .. __._ _.._ ..e..-_ _ _ _ _ __ inin Firwwfi iinhiinn ._ _ o . Maintenance District No. 1: /~ ~ ANNIXATION N0.21: Trail No. 13118 102 S.F. ANNEXATION N0.22: Trail No. 13052 221 S.F. 2/9500 1/2200 ANNe7(ATION NO. Zi: Tract No./1997 19 S.F. 5/5800 Tract 12835 132 T.H. 4/9500 Tract 10246 15 S.F. 4/9500 DR 86-12 114 Apts. 3!9500 ANNEXATION ND. 24 Tract 4244 Tract 1829 Tract 3221 APN 207-235-i APN 207-235-2 APN 207-235-19 APN 207-235-20 APN 207-235-21 APN 207-234-9 APN 207-234-10 APN 207.234-11 ANNEXATION N0.25: Tract 12577 16 S.F. 2/9500 Traci f3342 72 S.F. 6/5600 6!9500 2/22000 nn11.ICVnTIM1A1rl ~• Tranl 1n7do 67RP FWNEXATION N0.27: MDR 87-05 2 Assort. Units P.M. 10037 37 Assort. Units DH 86.19 16 Assort. Units ANNF~(ATION N0.28 P.M. 8901 1 Assort. Untt 1/16000 CUP 85-26 1 Assort. Unit 1/9500 P.M. 9409 1 Assort. Unit DR 86-38 15 Assort. Units 3;9500 DR 88-26 103 Assort. Untts P.M. 9504 11 Assort. Units 10/16000 ANNEXATION N0.29: Tract 12914 78 S.F. 3!9500 2 ~SS ANNEXATION N0.30: P.M. 10696 79 Assort. Units 2/9500 DR 87-02 19 Assort. Units P.M. 10444 25 Assort. Units 2/9500 1/27500 DR 85-52 37.5 Assort. Units DR 85-48 54.5 Assort. Uniis 2/9500 Tract 12671-1 31 S.F. 2/9500 Tract 12671-2 42 S.F. Tract 12671-3 28 S.F. 1/9500 Traci 12671-4 34 S.F. iiBSuG Tract 12650-3 50 S.F. ANNEXATION N0.31: DR 87-Ot 13 Assort. Units 2/9500 ANNEXATICN N0.32: Tract 13542-1 96 S.F. 7/9500 Tract 13475 29 S.F. 219500 Tract 13353 15 Condos. 2/9500 Tract 10414 17 S.F. P.M. 10084 5.2 Assort. Units ANNFXATIDN ND. 33: Tract 12873 304 S.F. Tract 13279 13 S.F. Tract 13443 948 S.F. DR 87-22 25 Assm;. Units DR 86-42 18 Assmi. Units 1;9500 1/27500 CUP 85-37 2 Assort. Units ANNEXATION N0.34: Tract 13444 176 S.F. DR 85-06 248 Assort. Units DR 86-39 2 Assort. Units ANNEXATION N0.35: Tract 13440 114 S.F. Tract 13441 115 S.F. Tract 13442 153 S.F. Tract 13445 21S S.F. P.M. 10617 34 Assort. Units DR 87-21 12 Assort. Units 2/9500 DR 87-15 3 Assort. Units OR 87-09 35 Assort. Units 6/9500 1122000 ANNEXATION N0.36: DR 87-OS i Assort. Unit CUP 87-07 2 Assort. Units ANNEXATION ND. 37: Tract 13275 290 CorWos. P.M. 11236 5 Assort. Units 3 S~ ANNEXATION N0.38: OR 87-43 4 Assmt. Units DR 87-24 38 Assmt. Units ANNEXATIgJ tJ0.39: Tract 13557 30 S.F. Tract 13562 63 S.F. Tract 13559 74 S.F. DR 87-31 15 Assmt. Units FISCAL Y""EAR i358i85 PROJECTED EXPENDRURES Assessment Admin. $48,720 Capital Expend. 20,000 Electric Utilities 42,000 110,720 PROJECTED REVENUE 12,100 X $7.52 .$91,430 Carrya+er Funds 19,290 Additional projected carryover funds of $20,000 will to used to fund this Ighting district until assessment receipts are received during January. /S~ STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 Local Streets ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT Fiscal Year 1999/89 The annual report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) is prepared in compliance with the requirement o9 Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and righways Code, State or Caiiiornia (Lardscapirg and L'yhtirg Act c1 1872). This report deals with the projected costs for fiscal year 1987/88 and the projected expen- ditures for fiscal year 1988/89 to determine annual assessments. The assessment will be used to furnish services and materials for the ordinary end usual maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of street light improvements as provided by Southern Cal'rfomia Edison Com- pany. Maintenance is considered of general bene(n to all areas in Me District and costs shall be divided as indicated in the body of this report. Detailed maintenance activities inGude the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area. Street lights were constructed end installed by the developers for the individual subdivisions. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each devebpment and as approved by the Engineeri!p DNisbn. FISCAL YEAR 1987188 REVIEW own.tvrron ecruet r-osrc 87/88 J~ AS OF 02/29/88 PRDJE(:TED 6/30/88 Assessment Admin. $2,219 10,060 10,060 Maint./Operations 870 3,172 3,172 Electric Utilities 43.500 16.528 24.793 46,589 29,760 38,025 During fiscal year 1987/88 the following devel opments and lights were annexed into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2: ANNEXATION NO. 16: Trac! 13118 102 S.F. 41/5800 ANNEXATION NO. 17: Tract 11997 19 S.F. 1115800 Tract 10246 15 S.F. 9/5800 !SO ANNEXATION NO. ~8: ANNEXATION N0.19: ANNEXATION N0.20: ANNEXATION N0.21: ANNEXATION N0.72: ANNEXATION N0.23: .ANNEX.ATION N0.24: ANNEXATION N0.25: Tract 1829 Tract 3221 Tract 4244 APN 207-331-Ot APN 207-331-02 APN 207-331-19 APN 201.335-20 APN 201.335-21 APN 207-234-09 APN 207-234-10 APN 207.234-11 Tract 12577 Tract 70349 Tract 12650-3 Tract 12914 Tract 13542-i Tract 13475 Traet 10414 Tree! 12873 Tract 13275 8 S.F. 9 S.F. 64 S,F. 16 S.F. 57 S.F. 50 S.F. 78 S.F. 96 S.F. 29 S.F. 17 S.F. 304 S, F, 290 Condos. 4/5800 4/5800 4/5800 1/5800 1 /5800 33/5800 21/5800 4/9500 38/5800 73/5800 10/5800 46/5900 3/5800 FISCAL YEAR 1988/89 PROJECTED EXPENDITURES Assessment Admin, $14,804 Electric Utilities 53,000 67,604 After review of current expenditures, projected revenue end possible carryover funds ($SO,oCO) it has been determined that the assessment for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 can ue bwered from $25.00 to $23.00 for liseal year 1988/89. 3651IUnlts X $23,00 - 83,973 The carryover funds will be used to support this district until assessments ara receivetl during January. 2 ~s9 STREET LIGHTING MIA7NTENANGE DISTRICT NO. 3 Vletorla Planned Community ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT Fiacal Year 1988189 The annual report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Vicoria Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 8 of the Streets and nghways Ca;e, Siaib o•. Catlfcmla (LarAs:,aplry and L'y-hii;tg AC. Y 73'2). This repon deals with the projected costs for fiscal year 1987/88 and the projected expen- oitures for fiscal year 1988/89 to determine annual assessments. The assessments will be used to furnish services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of street light improvements as provided by Southern California Edison Company. Maintenance is wnsldared to be of general benefit to all areas within the district and costs shall be divided as inrNcated in the body of this report. Detailed maintenance aclivltles Induda the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of Me sub)ed area. Street lights were constructed and installed by the devebpers for the iMividual subdivisions. The plans and street lights ere as atlpulated In the conditbns of approval for each devebpment and as approved by the Engineering Dblsbn. FISCAL YEAR 1987/88 REVIEW PROJECTED ACTUAL COSTS 87/88 AS OF PfiDJECTED Assessment Admin. 1,938 8,532 8,532 Malnt./Operaticns 760 30 30 Electric Utilities 3n.000 21.452 32.718 40,698 30,074 41,280 During fiscal year 7987/88 the following projects within the Victoria Planned Community were annexed into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3: /~ a ANNEXATION N0.4: Tract 13052 221 S.F. 55/5800 ANNEXATION fJO. S: CUP 85-26 1 Assmt. Unit ANNEXATION N0.5: Tract 13279 13 S.F. 73/5800 76/9500 Tract 13443 148 S.F. 39/5800 ANNEXATION N0.7: Tract 13440 114 S.F. 31/5800 TraC! ?3441 ??5 cc 2g/5gnn Tract 13442 153 S.F. 48/5800 Tract 13444 179 S.F. 23/5800 Tract 13445 215 S.F. 58/5800 This district experienced normal and routine expenditures for the current fiscal year. FISCAL YEAR 1998/89 PROJECTED EXPENDITURES Assessment Admin. 1 1 ,780 Electric Utilities 46,000 57,760 Aher review of expenditures, projected carryover ($38,000) and projected revenue end expenditures for fiscal year 1988/89 h has been determined that assessments can be lowered from $35.00 to $27.00 per assessment unit. 294GlunilS X $27.00 79,380 The projected carryover funds will be used to support this district until assessment receipts are received during January. 2 /~~ STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 Terra Vista Planned Community ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT Fiscal Year 1988!89 The annual report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter ?, Division 5 of the Streets and Hghways Cade; State of Calacrnia ;Landscaping a.^.d L~gh?irg A„^! o! ?972). This report deals with the projected costs for fiscal year 1987/88 and the projected expen- ditures for fiscal year 1988/89 to determine annual assessments. The assessments will be used to furnish services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operations, servicing and restoration of street Ight improvements as provided by Southern California Edison Company. Maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and costs shall be divided as indicafed in the body of this report. Detailed maintenance activltles indude the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area. Street lights were constructed and installed by the developers for the IndNidual subdivisions. The plans and street fights are as stipulated In the condhions of approval for each devebpment and as approved by the Engineerirtp Division. FISCAL YEAR 1987/88 REVIEW PROJECTED ACTUAL COSTS 87/88 AS OF pROJEOTEp i~ 02/29/88 6/30188 Assessment Admin. 1,020 4,780 4,780 Maint./Operations 400 475 475 Electric Utilities 2o.nog ~S )fir 596 , 21,420 15,653 20,851 Street Lghtin9 Maintenance District No. 4 experienced normal and routine expenditures during the current fiscal year. During fiscal year 1987/88 the folbwing projects were annexed to this district: // AtJ4EXATKKJ N0.6: P.M. 9504 - 0 - 3/5800 4/16000 ANNEXATION N0.7: Tract 12671-i 31 S.F. 2615600 Tract 12671-2 42 S,F. Tract 12871-3 28 S.F. Tract 12871-4 34 S.F. FISCAL YEAR 5968/89 PROJECTED EXPENDITURES Assessment Admin. $7,440 Electric Utilities 30,000 37,440 ANer review of current expenditures, projected carryover ($40,000), projected expendhures and revenue it has been determined that the assessment rate for Street Lighifnfl Maintenance District No. 4 can be bwered from $25.00 to $24.00 per assessment unit. Projected Revenue: 18fi0 X $24.C0 S44,fi40 Tha projected carryover will be used to fund this district until assessment receipts are received 2 /~ 3 STREET' LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 {Caryn Planned Community) ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT Flscaf Year 1999189 The annual report for Street Lghting Maintenance District No, 5 (Caryn Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways CWa, State of CaffioT,ia {Landseapiry arq'i Lighting AC, of 1972). This report deals with the projected costs for fiscal year 1987/88 and the projected expen- ditures for fiscal year 1988/89 to determine annual assessments. The assessments will be used to furnish services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of street light improvements as provided by Southern California Edison Company. Maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and costs shall be divided as indicated in the body of this report. Detailed maintenance activities inGude the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area. Street lights wore constructed and installed by the devebpers for the IndNidual subdivisions. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each devebpment and as approved by the Engineering Division. FISCAL YEAR 1997/88 REVIEW Dpfl.IFr:TFn r:nSTA 87/88 AS OF Assessment Admin. $739 1,896 1,896 Maint.lOperaticns 290 -0- •g- Eleciric Utilities t4.5g0 ~= 5.872 15,529 1,896 7,768 During March 1988 the energy charges for this district were fumed over to the District. These charges wero assumed as of 10/7/87 which ended the one year maintenance period for the first group of lights. Additional lights will be assumed during the next fiscal year as tracts are finalized and the maintenance period ends. During fiscal year 1987/88 the folbwinq projects ovari imn wont i inMinn FFaintonanno liceirt Fin 5• / ~~ AhBJIXATION N0.2: TfaCt 13557 30 D.U. 8/5800 Tract 13562 83 D.U. 13/5800 Tract 13559 74 D.U. 1 8/5800 FISCAL YEAR /988183 PROJECTED EXPENDITURES Assessment Admin. $1 , 896 Electric Utilities 7,500 9,396 PROJECTED REVENUE 474/units X $35.00. $16,580 It has been determined that because this district is so new and there is the possibility of more lights being assumed during fiscal year 1998/99, the assessment will remain at $35.00. Projected carryover funds ;$5,000) wilt be used to support this !ightinq district until assessments are received in January. 2 /p~ STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTFICT NO. 6 Commercialll ndustrial ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT Fiscal Year 1988/89 The annual report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (CommerciaVlndustrial) is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter t, Division 15, of the Street and iighways Cude, State 07 Califc,~,ia (bn.'scapi .g and :.',Uhting A,:t cf !^72) This report deals with the projected costs for fiscal year 1987/88 and the projected expen- ditures for fisral year 1988/89 to determine annua! assessments. The assessments will be used to furnish services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of street light improvements ss provided by Southern California Edison Company. Maintenance is considered to be of general benefit to all areas in the district and costs shall be divided as indicated in the body of 9lls report. Street Lighting Maintenance Distrbt No. 6 was established for the Commercial and/or In- dustrial properties within the City mainly within the Industrial and Foothill Specific Plan areas. Areas included in the work program are the street lights within the rights-of-way or designated easements of sheets dedicated to the City and are Ilmfied to bcal streets. The work program excludes maintenance of street lights in dghtsof-way of major streets. Detailed maintenance activities indude the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for the illumination of the subject area. Street lights were constmaed and installed try the devebpere for the indNidual projects within ~~~ w,,.,•~..r rtio ..rant and cr.our ~inmu urn us atiradated In Me conditions of eooroval for each development and as approved try the Engineedng Divison. FISCAL YEAR 1997188 REVIEW The district was formed during tiSCal year 1987/88. No properties were assessed during the current year. The following projects were annexed during fiscal year 1987/88' ANNEXATION N0.1: ANNEXATION N0.2: MDR 87-05 1.0 Acres P.M. 10037 17.5 Acres DR 86.19 8.0 Acres i r~? kF-:iR i.n Aue3 DR 86-26 51.6 Acres 2315800 // !° AMIEXATION N0.3: MlNEXATIONfJ0.4: ANNEXATION N0.5: AAidDWTION N0.7: ANNEXATON N0.8: AMIEXATION N0.9: ANNEXATION N0.10: ANNEXATION fJ0.11: ANNEXATION NO. 1?~ P.M. 10696 DR 87-02 P.M. 10444 DR 85-52 DR 85-48 DR 87-01 P.M. 10884 CR 87-2c" DR 86-42 CUP 85-37 DR 86-39 P.M. 10617 DR 87-21 DR 87-15 DR 87.09 OR 87-OS CUP 87-07 P.M. 11238 DR 87-24 DR A7-A1 39.3 Acres 9.8 Acres 12.7 Apes 18.4 Acres 27.4 Acres 1/9500 2/5800 1 /9500 315800 4/5800 16.0 Acres 2.6 Acres i9,1 metes 15.3 Acres .8 Acre 1.0 Acre 16.9 Acres 18.9 Acres 1.6 Acres 17.4 Acres 6/5800 1/5800 .7 Acre 1.4 Aces 3.0 Aces 18.9 Acres O F Ann< FISCAL YEAR 1988/99 PROJECTED EXPENDITURES Assessment Admin. 52,012 Electric Utilities 8,000 11.012 PROJECTED REVENUE 503/Units X $25.00 - 12,575 The rate of devebpment and acceptance of street IlphOn9 within Street L'ghtirq Maintenance District No. 6 will determine the actual expenditures of energy charges. It has been determined that an assessment rate o} $25.00 per assessment unit will provide sufficient funds for fiscal year 1988/89. 2 /~° / RESOLUTION NO. ~~` ~~ A AESOLOTION OS TH8 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OS RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGLNEER'S ANNUAL RBPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRTCT$ NO3. 1, 2, 3, ~, 5 AND 6 RC;JUI.VED by the City Courc it of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City clerk of the city an annual report in writing for which assessments are tc be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and/or improvement of said Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 9, 5 and 6. WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the city Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and every part t:12reJf, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered as follows: 1. That the Engineer's Estimate of itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 2. That the diagrams showing the Assessment Districts referred to an described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment Districts are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 3. Th a_r thn ~ -fed -. ~p.c amonro ~~ -ui,iii VlaiOnS up.,.. t of land in said Assessment Dist riots •in,proportion to the est i.mated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report fcr the fiscal year 1988/89 for the purposes o£ all subsequent proceedings. ANNU1\L A33&SSNBNT IUTSS 1 9A5/86 198 a'/87 19A7/8A 19A8/A9 Lighting District $1 8.91 8.91 7.52 7.52 (Arterial) Lighting District $2 36.22 31.23 25.00 ?.3.00 (Local) Lighting District $3 48.65 48.03 35.00 27.00 (Victoria) Lighting District $4 27.14 32.21 25.00 25.00 (Terra vista) Lighting District $5 -0- -0- 35.00 35.00 (Caryn) Lighting District $6 -0- -0- -0- 25.00 (Commercial/Industrial) STR88T LIGHTING NAINTBNANCB DISTRICT NO. 1 Arterial Strata ANNOAL SNGIN88A'S ABPORT 81aca1 rear 1958/89 The annual report for Street Lighting Maintenance Districr_ No. 1 (Arterial Streets) is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways rnda; Sra<e of ra l; po.n_ ~ rr.~ndcnan:..., .,d w«,..._ , 07~, _ ._ __ _r _..~ .. i^y..,....y Ac,. ... ~, . This report deals with the projected costs for fiscal year 1987/88 and the projected expenditures fez fiscal year 1988/89 to determine annual assessments. The assessments will be used to furnish services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of street light improvements as provided by Southern California Edison Company. Maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and costs shall be divided as indicated in the body of this report. Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area. Street lights were constructed and installed by the developers for the individual subdivisions. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each deve'_opment and as approved by the Engineering Division. FISCAL YEAR 1987/88 R8VI8N PROJECTED ACTIIAL COSTS 87/88 BS]L>GET AS OF -2/29/8A PROJECTED 6/30/AA Assessment Admin. x1,979 -0- $31,952 Payroll 2,716 616 616 Fringe Benefits 951 -0- -0- Maint./Operations 580 130 200 Capital Expend. 20,000 -0- -0- Electric Util 35.000 -' 14.943 22.915 Fii _., -_ con .5, .,,.. 5, io., During fiscal year 1987/88 the following tracts and lights were annexed into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1: ANNEXATION NO. 21: Tract No. 13118 102 S.F. ANNEXATION) N0. 22: Tract No. 13052 221 S.F. 2/9500 1/2 X0 ANNEXATION NO. 23: Tract No, 11997 19 S. F. 5/5800 Tract 12835 132 T .H. 9/9500 Tract 10296 15 S.F. 9/9500 DR 86-12 119 Apts. 3/9500 ANN F.XAT?(1N Nll, 29 Tr9Ct 4299 Tract 1823 Tract 3221 APN 2C7-235-1 APN 207-235-2 APN 207-235-19 APN 207-235-20 APN 207-235-21 APN 207-239-9 APN 207-239-30 APN 207-239-11 ANNEXATION NO. 25: Tract 12577 16 S .F. 2/9500 Tract 13392 72 S .F. 6/5800 6/9500 2/22000 ANNEXATION NO. 26: Tract 10399 57 S .F. ANNEXATION NO. 27: MDR 87-OS 2 Assort. Units 7 " J JI Htl y1RC. Un1C3 DR 86j19 16 Assort. Units ANNEXATION NO. 28 P.M. 8901 1 Assort. Unit 1!1 6000 CUP 85-26 1 Assort. Unit 1/9500 P.M. 9909 1 Assort. Unit DR 86-38 15 Assort. Units 3/9500 DR 86-26 103 Assort. Units P.M. 9509 11 Aasmt. Units 10/16000 ANNEXATION N0. 29: Tract 12914 7B S .F. 3/9500 2 ANNEXATION NO. 30: P.M. 10696 79 Assort. Units 2/9500 DR 87-02 19 Assort. Units P.M. 10499 25 Assort. Units 2/9500 1/27500 DR 85-52 37,5 Assort. Units DR 85-98 59.5 Assort. Units 2/9500 Tract 12671-1 31 S.E. 2/9500 Tract 12671-2 92 S.F. Tract 12671-3 28 S.F. 1/9506 Tract 12671-9 34 S.F. 1/9500 .ra..~ .265-3 50 S.F. ANNEXATION N0. 31: DR 87-01 13 Assort. Units 2/9500 ANNEXATION N0. 32: Tract 13592-1 96 S.F. 7/9500 Tract 13975 29 S.F. t/9500 Tract 13353 15 Condos. 2/9500 Tract 10919 17 S.F. P.M. 10084 5.2 Assort. Units ANNEXATION N0. 33: Tract 12873 304 S.F. Tract 13279 13 S.F. Tract 13943 198 S,E. DR 87-22 25 Assort. Units DR 86-92 18 Assort. Units 1/9500 1/27 500 CUP 85-37 2 Assort. Units ANNEXATION N0. 39: Tract 13494 176 S.F. DR 85-06 298 Assort. Units un o6-.ie [ Assort. units ANNEXATION N0. 35: Tract 13490 119 S.F. Tract 13991 115 S.F. Tract 13992 153 S.F. Tract 13445 215 S.F. P.M. 10617 34 Assort. Units DR 87-21 12 Assort. Units 2/9500 DR 97-15 3 Assort. Units DR 87-09 35 Assort. Units 6/9500 1/2.2000 ANNEXATION N0, 36: DR 87-05 1 Assort. Unit CUP 87-07 2 Assort. Units ............. ...... ..... .... -- 75 ~ 290 condos. P~M~ 11236 5 Assort. Units ANNEXATION N0. 38: OR 87-93 9 Assort. Units DR 87-29 38 Assort. Units 3 ANNEXATION NO. 39; Tract 13557 30 S.F. Tract 13562 63 S.F. Tract 13559 74 S.F. DR 07-31 15 Assmt. Units FISCAL YEAR 1989/89 2ROJECTED E}:a ENDZTDA'aa Assessment Admin. $48,720 Capital Expend. 20,000 Electric Utilities 92,000 110,720 PROJECTED AEVENQE 12,180 X $7.52 =$91,930 Carryover Funds 19,290 Additional projected carryover funds of $20,000 will be used *_o fund this lighting district until assessment receipts are received during January. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCB DISTRICT NO. 2 Local Straata ANNOAL BNGINfifiR'S REPORT 8iacal Year 1988/89 The annual report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets> is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 9, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Ffighways Code, v~d~c vi ~.a iiivrnid (LandSCa'y iiry finu ii y,it iiry ACS v.. ioi2j. This report deals with the projected costs for fiscal year 1987/88 and the projected expenditures for fiscal year 1988/89 to determine annual assessments. The assessment will be used to furnish services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of street light improvements as provided by Southern California Edison Company. Maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and costs shall be divided as indicated in the body of this report. Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area. Street lights were constructed and installed by the developers for the individual subdivisions. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by tY.e Engineering Division. SISCAL YEAR 1987/88 REVZEN PROJECTED ACTDAL COSTS 87/88 AS OF PROJECTED BUDGET 02/29/88 6/30/AB Assessment Admin. $2,219 10,060 10,060 Maint./Operations 870 3,172 3,172 Electric Utilities 4i SDD 16.528 24.7 a3 96,589 29,'760 38,025 During fiscal year 1987/88 the following developments and lights weir drincncu inw u~i cc~ iyh riiy is iru cr ,dLCc viS~i iC~ nJ. c. ANNEXATION NO. 16: Tract 13118 102 S.F. 41/5800 ANNEXATION NO. 17: Tract 1199 19 S.F. 11/5800 Tract 10296 15 S.F. 9/5800 ANNEXATION N0. 18: Tract 1829 8 S.F. 9/5800 Tract 3221 9 S.F. 4/5800 Tract 9249 69 S.F, 9;5800 APN 207-331-01 1/5800 APN 207-331-02 APN 207-331-19 APN 201-335-20 APN 201-335-21 APN 207-234-09 APN 207-234-30 TDA~ ~Jv7 i3 i- a./.~iOvv ANNEXATION N0. 19: Tract 12577 16 S.F. ANNEXATION N0. 20: Tract 10399 57 S.F, 33/5800 ANNEXATION N0 .21: Tract 126503 50 S.F. 21/5800 AtNEXATION NO. 22: Tract 12919 78 S.E. 9/9500 ANNEXATION NO. 23: Tract 135921 96 S.F. 38/5800 Tract ],3475 29 S.F. 13/5800 Tract 10419 17 S.F. 10/5800 ANNEXATION N0. 29: Tract 128'73 309 S.F. 46/5800 P.NNEXATION N0. 25: Tract 13275 290 Condos. 3/5800 AISCIIL Y1E711t 1988/89 PROJ&CTED S7CP&RDITORLS Assessment Admin. $14,604 Electric Utilities 53,000 67, 609 After review of current expenditures, projected revenue and possible carryover funds ($50,000) it has been determined that the assessment for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 can be lowered from $25.00 to $23.00 for fiscal year 1988/89. 3651/Units X 523.00 = 83,973 _.__ ____ .-_ __.._., ..,. ,upper rt ,.,..~ ... ~,.r,c,. ~n ~,.. a ssessments~are received during~January. 2 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCB DISTRICT NO. 3 Victoria Planned Community ANNDAL ENGINEER'$ REPORT aiacal Yaar 1988/89 The annual report for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nc. 3 (Victoria Planned Comununity) is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and u;..h.~~..~ r.,no e. pro ..a ~i: F..~,,;~ „~.,..~.. ~..; ..,. ,.a .....:..,_ of 1972). This report deals with the projected costs for fiscal year 1987/88 and the projected expenditures for fiscal year 1988/69 to determine annual assessments. The assessments will be used to furnish services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of street light improvements as provided by Southern California Edison Company. Maintenance is considered to be of general benefit to all areas within the district and costs shall be divided as indicated in the body of this report.. Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area. Street lights were constructed and installed by the developers for the individual subdivisions. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development and u.a u~.~.l :lvGu uy .,..~. .:y iucc~iuy ivaoiva. FISCAL YEAR 1987/88 REVIEW PROJECTED ACTOAL COSTS 87/88 AS OF PROJECTED BUDGET 02/29/88 F./30/88 Assessment Admin. 1,938 8,532 8,532 Maint./Operations 760 30 30 Electric Utilities 38.OOD 21.452 z?. 7~8 90,698 30,019 41,280 During fiscal year 1987/88 the following projects within the Victoria Planned Community were annexed into Street Lighting Ida intenance District No. 3: ANNEXATION NO. 9: Tract 13052 221 S. F, 55/5800 ANNEXATION NO. 5: CUP 8 5-26 1 Assort. Unit ANNEXATION NO. 6: Tract 13279 13 S. F. 73/5800 76/9500 Tract 13993 198 S. F. 39/5800 ANNEXATION NO. 7: Tract 13940 119 S. F. 31/5800 Tract 13991 115 S. F. 28i 5800 ~- '~O/ rOV V Tract 13999 179 S. E. 23/5800 Tract 13995 215 S. F. 58/5800 This district experienced normal and rou ti ne expenditures for the current fiscal year. FISCAL YBAR 1988/89 FROJBCTHD BXPHNDITDRHS Assessment Admin. 11,760 Electric Utilities 96,000 57,760 After review of expenditures, projected carryover (S38, U00) and projectetl revenue and expenditures for fiscal year 1988/89 it has been determined that assessments can be lowered from $35.00 to $27.00 per assessment unit. 2940/units X $27.00 = 79,380 The projected carryover funds will be used to support this district until assessment receipts are received during January. 2 STREET LIGHTING NAINTENANCB DISTRICT NO. ~ Torre Vista Planaad Coamvaity ANNOAL ENGINEER'S RSPORT yiacal rear 1958/89 The annual report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 9 (Terra Vista Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 9, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and iii yiawaya Code, State of California (Landscaping aed Lighting Act of 1972), This report deals with the projected costs for fiscal year 1987/88 and the projected expenditures for fiscal year 1986/89 to determine annual assessments. The assessments will be used to furnish services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operations, servicing and restoration of street light improvements as provided by Southern California Edison Company. Maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and costs shall be divided as indicated in the body of this report. Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area. Street lights were constructed and installed by the developers for the individual subdivisions. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as approves oy cne Engineering urv.rsion. 6ISCAL XEAR 1987/88 REVIEW PROJECTED ACTpAL COSTS 87/88 B[1DCFT AS OF 02/29/88 PROJECTED 6/30/88 Assessment Admin. 1,020 9,780 9,780 Maint./operations 900 975 975 Electric Utilities 20 o0a 10.398 15.596 21,920 15.653 20. A51 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 9 experienced normal and routine expenditures during the current fiscal year. During fiscal year 1587/88 the following projects were annexed to this district: ANNEXATION N0. 6: P.M. 9509 -0- ANNEXATION NO. 7: Tract 12671-1 31 S.F. Tract 12671-2 92 S.F. Tract 12671-3 28 S.F. Tract 12671-9 39 S,F. 3/5800 9/16000 26/5800 FISCAL YEAR 1988/89 PROJECTLD LXPLNDITIIRES Assessment Admin. $7,990 Electric Utilities 30,000 37,940 After review of current expenditures, projected carryover ($40,000), projected expenditures and revenue it has been determined that the assessment rate for Street Ligh±ing Maintenance District No. 4 can be lowered from $25.00 to $29.00 per assessment unit. Projected Revenue: 1860 X 524.00 = $44,640 The projected carryover will be used to fund this district until assessment receipts are received in January. 2 $TR88T LIGHTING lSAINTBNANCB DISTRICT NO. 5 (Csryn Planned Community) ANNDAL ENGINEER'S REPORT Sincal Year 1988/89 The annual report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community} is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Hi gia"ridy5 Cvdc, o~a~c v1 i.a Lifvi"rlia 1Lai,uSCdpii uJ dilu niyhtiilg AGi, of 1972). This report deals with the projected costs for fiscal year 1987/88 and the projected expenditures for fiscal year 1988/89 to determine annual assessments. The assessments will be used to furnish services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of street light improvements as provided by Southern California Edison Company. Maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and costs shall be divided as indicated in the body of this report. Detailed maintenance activiY.ies include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area. Street lights were constructed and installed by the developers for the individual subdivisions. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as approveu uy uie anyiueeriug uiviaion. SISCAL YEAR 1987/88 REVIEN PROJECTED COSTS 87/88 AS OF PROJECTED HiD-.T 02/29/88 6/30/88 Assessment Admin. $739 1,896 1,896 Maint./Operations 290 -0- -0- Electric Utilities 14.500 ~- 5•A72 15,529 1,896 7,768 During March 1988 the energy charges for this district were turned VVCL LV I.IIC D1Jl.L LI.L. 31lC JC 1.11tlLtjCJ WCLC tlJJlI I11Cd tlJ VL 1V/ //O/ which ended the one year maintenance period for the first group of lights. Additional. lights will be assumed during the next fiscal year as tracts are finalized and the maintenance period ends. During fiscal year 1987/88 the following projects were annexed into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5: ANNEXATION NO. 2: Tract 13557 30 D.U. 6/5800 Tract 13562 83 D.U. 13/5800 Tract 13559 79 D.U, 18/5800 FISCAL YEAR 1988/89 PROJECTED EXPEIQD ITIIAE3 Assessment Admin. $1,896 Electric Utilities 7,500 9,396 PROJECTED REYENOE 979/units X $35.00 = 516,590 It has been determined that because this district is so new and there is the possibility of more lights being assumed during fiscal year 1968/89, the assessment will remain at $35.00. Projected carryover funds ($5,000) will be used to support this lighting district until assessments are received in Januarv. 2 STRBET LIGHTIRG !(AIHT88ANCE DISTRICT !]0. 5 Commercial/Industrial ARROAL BNGINEBR'S REPORT Fiacal Yeas 1988/89 The annual report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 9, Chapter 1, Division 15, of the Street iy^h ayo ..J'~e, .... ate v.. ..au LJrrua iLd:.dSGd'ying -nom ighL u`ry Act of 1972). This report deals with the projected costs for fiscal year 1987/88 and the projected expenditures for fiscal year 1988/89 to determine annual assessments. The assessments will be used to furnish services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of street light improvements as provided by Southern California Edison Company. Maintenance is considered to be of general benefit to all areas in the district and costs shall be divided as indicated in the body of this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 was established for the Commercial and/or Industrial properties within the City mainly within the Industrial and Foothill Specific Plan areas. Areas included in the work program are the street lights within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City and are limited to local streets. The work program excludes maintenance of street lights in rights-of-way of major streets. VCLCIICU 1116111LCIIOIII.C aL,L1V1L1C, 1111: 111UC LIIC LCptl11, LCIIIU VGl UL replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for the illumination of the subject area. Street lights were constructed and installed by the developers for the individual projects within the district. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineer. ing Division. FISCAL YEAR 2987/88 REVIEW The district was formed during fiscal year 1987/88. No properties were assessed during the current year. The following projects were annexed during fiscal year 1987/88: .u.~......,, ...,. ",~. ~ ~ bIDR B7-OS 1.0 Acres P.M. 10037 17.5 Acres DR 86-19 8.0 Acres ANNEXATION NO. 2: DR 86-39 7.6 Acres ANNEXATION NO. DR 86-26 3: P M 10696 51.6 Acres 23/5800 . . ' 39.3 Acres i/9500 CR 8 7-02 9.6 Acres 2/5800 P,M, 10999 12,7 Acres 1/9500 DR 85-52 18.9 Acres 3/5800 DR 85-98 27.4 Acres 9/5800 ANNEXATION NC, 9: DR 87-01 is r. ., ANNEXATION NO. 5: P.M. 10689 2.6 Acres ANNEXATION NO. 6; DR 87-22 19.1 Acres DR 86-92 15.3 Acres 6/5800 CUP 85-37 ,8 Acre ANNEXATION N0. 7: DR 86-39 1.0 Acre 1/5800 ANNEXATION NO. 8: P,M. 1061'7 16.9 Acres DR 87-2i 16.9 Acres DR 87-15 1.6 Acres DR 87-09 17.4 Acres ANNEXATION NO. 9: DR 87-05 .7 Acze CUP 87-07 1.4 Acres ANNEXATION N0. 10; P.M. 11236 3.0 Acres ANNEXATION NO. 11: na a~_on ..~... %.~.m ANNEXATION NO. 12: DR 87-31 9.5 Acres SISCAL YEAR 1988/89 PROJECTED E7CPENDITDAES Assessment Admin. $2,012 Electric Utilities 9,000 11, 012 PROJECTED REVENDE 503/i7nits X $25.00 = 12,575 The rate of development and acceptan ce of street Yighting within Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 will determine the actual expenditu res of energy charges. It has been determined that an assessment rate of $25.00 per assessment unit will sufficient f d f provide un s or fiscal year 1988/89. 2 RESOLUTION NO. gg -a7 ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING RS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAIN- TENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1988/89 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFEAING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO The Ciry Council of the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: SECTION t: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intentbn of this Ciry Council to levy and wllect assessments within Street Lighting Maimenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 for the fiscal year 1988/89 for the maintenance and operation of those parkways, parks and facilities thereon dedicated for common greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of saM Districts. Said maintenance and operaton inclrxtBS the cost and supervision of street lighting maintenance (including repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area) in connection with said districts. SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be boated within the roadway iiyins-ui-way erro easements enumerated in the report of the Ciry Engineer and more par- Iicularly described on maps whbh are on file in the City Clerk's Office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. SECTION 3: That the contemplated work. in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefi6 and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the distrcts, which said districts are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and whbh districts are described as folows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Street Lighting Maintenaxe District No. t", "Man of Street Llghtino Maininnan(x Distric! No. 2', Map of SL Set LSghtinv Maii,terance 'uisirict ivo. 5", 'Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4", "Map of Street Lfphfing Maintenance District No. 5", and "Map of Street Ughting Maintenance District No. 8", Indbating by said boundary lines the extant of the territory Included within each assessment district and which maps are on file in the Office of the Ciry Clark of said City. (~ t") Cf f 1' COUJCIL RESOLUitON STRF~ f l1GHI'ING MAINT. DISTRICTS May 4, 1988 Page 2 Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more part~ular description of said assessment districts, and the said maps so an file shall govern for all details as to the extant of said assessment districts. SECTION 4: The City council of said City by Resolution No. 'has approved the annual report of the City Engineer which report indicates the amount of the proposed assess- ments, the distrbt bouMaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report tills 'Annual Engineer's Report' is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made kr all particulars 4or the anwunt and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION 5: Notice is hereby gHen that on the 1st day of Jung, 1989, at the hour of 730 p.m. in the City Council Chambers in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons may appear aM show cause why said work shauld not be done or carried out a why assessments shouts not be levied and collected for fiscal year 1989/89. Protests must be in wrNinq and must contain a description of the property in which each signer Mereof is Interested, suttident to identity the Sams, and muss 6e delivered fo the City Clerk of said City prbr to the time set far the hearing, and no other protests or obleclbns will be consWered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll such protest must tomato or be acwm- nnninJ A.. ...:,Inn n..:Jnnnn ~4n, nnnA ninnn~ In ~Fn n...nn• M ,I.n n.nnnw.. ~~ Jnn~J1.nJ SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall bo done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of Califomia despnated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Califor- nia. SECTION ~: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 8981 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolutbn and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, end the City Clerk shell cause the same to 6e published 10 days before the date set ror the Fnnrinn n1 Innn1 n n Tl.n Iln:l.. OnnnJ n< n ~nl ninn..Inltnn n..1JIn1.nJ L..L.. n,y, ,. o„ r , open '~opaq;nr , yai , , , W'^ m Inc City of Ontario California, and circulated in the City of Rancha Cucamonga, California. /~ RESOLI7TION N0. U 0 i~ / ~i RANCHO A RESOLIITICN OF THE CITY CODNCIL OF THH CITY OF COCAMONGA, CALISORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAIN TENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. I, 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 6 FOA THE FISCAL YEAR 198889 PDRSOANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND Livfi^a ING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pLrsuant to the provisions of the landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: SF('T ION 7; That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of *_his City Council to levy and collect assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 for the fiscal year 1988/89 for the main- tenance and operation of those oarkwavs, parks and facilities thereon dedicated for common greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said Districts. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supe rvisron or screen lrgnt rng marntenance lincluaing repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area) in connection with said districts. Location of Work SecTioN 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the roadway rights-of-way and easements enumerated in the report of the City Eng.i veer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the City Clerk's Office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. SF.t'.TTON 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said districts are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which districts are described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2", Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5", and "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6", indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within each assessment district and which maps are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. CZTY COUNCIL RESOLUTION STREET LIGHTING MAINT. DISTRICTS May 4, 1988 Page 2 Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more particular description of said assessment districts, and the said maps so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment districts. ~CTZON 9: The City council of said City by Resolutior. No. * has approved the annual report of the City Engineer which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report title "Annual Engineer's Report" is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that on the 1st day of June, 1988, at the hour of 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why assessments shoe ld not be levied and collected for fiscal year ].988/89. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll such protest must contain or be accompanied by writter. evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTS9N_fi: A11 the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of th=_ S*_a*_e of. California. SECTION 7: Published notire shall be made pursuant to Section 6961 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set. for the hearing, at least once in ': he Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. -CITY OF RANCHO CUGAMOWCA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 4, 1988 TO Mayor and Members of the City Courrci! FROM: Robert A. Riuo, Assistant Ciry Manager BY; Jerry 8. Fulwood, Resource Center Coordinator SUBJECT AQPR_OVAL2E.p,4EJ!AINARY ErvGiNteR'S RE ;.~._<: r. _5 Staff recommends that Ciry Council adopt the attached Resolutons giving preliminary approval of City Engineer's Reports and deciaring its intention to levy and collect assessments within the Park and Recreation improvement District for Flscal Year 1988189 and offering a time and place For hearing objections (hereto. Pursuant to the requirements of the Landscaping antl Lighting Act of 1972 a preliminary engineer's report for Park and Recreaton Improvement District has been prepared. A review of current year's activities (s included ac woii ~~ ;r„c~;~~ >~PUnriirures for fiscal year i wa/U7. The assessment for fiscal year 1988/89 is proposed to remain at $33.8o per dwelling unit. This assessment will provide sufficient funds to cover debt service. However, next fiscal year an increase may be recommended to assist with rising maintenance cost. Res Ily su, itle Robert A. R1YYd Assistant Ciry Manager RAR:JBFSgr Attachments: Annual Assessment Rates Engineer's Report Resolutions (2) ~~ RESOLUTION NO. ~ ~ _ a~ 9 A RESOILfiION Cf THE CftY COI,NCIL OFTHE CITYOF RANCFIO GJGAMCfJGA, CALIFOWJIA, OF PRELIMINARYAPPROVAL OF CITY QJC~ERti ANNUAL RF-PORf FOR THE PAPo(AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-95) RESOLVED lry the Ciy Couridi of the City of Rancho Cucamorpa that: WHEREAS, pursuam t~ the i.andscape and Lightlrg Ad of 1972, the Ciy Engineer is required b make and file with the Cly dark of the dry an annual report in writing for whM~ assessments are b 6e levied and wNected b pay Me costs of the maintenance araYor improve- ment of said Park end Reaeatbn Improvement Dfatrict (PD-B5). WHEREAS, the Ciy Engineer has madB and flletl wHh the dry Clads of sold City a report in writlng as called for under and pursuant to said Act, Whkit has been presented to Mis Ceundl fa oonsideratbn; antl WHEREAS, said Couridi has duy conskered said report and each and every part _ Thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report U su%Idem, and that said report nor any part thereof requires or should be modified In any reaped. - MOW, THEREFORE, h is ordered 8s folbivs: 1 . That the Engineers Estimate of Itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the inddental etwerisea In connection therewith, contained In said report be, end each of them are hereby preliminarhy approved and conlirmed. 2. That the diagrams showing the Assessment Dishkts referred to an described in said report, the boundaries of the suldWisbns of land within said Assessment Districts are hereby preliminamy approved antl con- firmed. 3. That the proposed assessments upon the subdWisbris of land In sak! Assessment Distrlds in proportbn to the estimated benefit to be receNed by said subdWisbn, respedivey, from said work and of the Incidental expenses thereof as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineers Annua! Re{>~ri for the !fiscal sear i9stL?'_+ for t^A purNOSes of aii sWSequent proceedings. l 7~ ANNUAL ASSESSMENT RATES Per Residential 1985/86 $34.65 1986/87 $33.50 1987/88 $33.50 1988/89 $33.50 Vacant Land 1.5 acres or less 17.32 16.75 16.75 16.75 Vacant Land 1.51 to 3.5 acres 51.99 50.25 50.25 50.25 Vacant Land 3.51 to 7.0 acres 121.19 117.25 117.25 117.25 Vacant land 7.01 to 14.01 acres 242.59 234.50 234.50 234.50 Vacant Land 14.01 to 25.0 acres 485.16 469.00 469.00 469.00 Vacant Land 25.01 acres and larger 866.42 837.50 837.50 637.50 ~~ TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE SECTION 1 SECTION 2 SECTION 3 SECTION 4 SECTION 5 EXHIBIT A AUTHORITY FOR REPORT FINDINGS DISTRICT ANALYSIS ESTIMATE OF COST METHOD OF SPREAD ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM MAPS ~~ SECTION 1 -AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report for the 1988-1969 Fiscal Year update is prepared pursuant to the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and In compliance vrith the requirements of Articte 4, Chapter 1, Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Section 22500 of the Streets and Highway Code. Provisans for this annual assessment ere included in Chapfer 3 of the Landscaping a^,d :igh8ng Ay, of 19'2. The purpose of this report is to set forth findings and the assessment analysis for the annual levy cf assessments for the Park and Recreation Improvement District No. 85-PD, thereafter referred to as 'the District". This District, utilizing direct benefit assessments, has been created to provide funds to finance the cost of constmction, maintenance, and operation of HerAage Community Park aM Red Hill Community Park in the City of Ranrdro Cucamonga. ~r SECTION 2 -FINDINGS Section 22573, Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, requires assessments to be levied according to benefit rather Man according to assessed value. The section states: •rne rst amount to ~ assessed t:,ooc lands :vi:hir an assess-art dist„ct ray ba apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proponbn to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the Improvements' The means of determining whether or not a pane! will benefit from the improvements is contained in the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7, commencing with Sectbn 5000 of the Streets and Hghways Code, State of Calibmia). The 1972 Acl also provides for the classification of varous areas whhin an assessment district into benefit areas where, by reason of variations in the nature ,location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive during differing degrees of benefit hom the improvements. Benefiting areas consist of all territory receiving substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements and may consist of contiguous or noncontiguous areas. As the assessments are levied on Me basis of benefit, they are considered a user's fee, rat a fez; and, therefore, aie rat governed by Ankle XIIIA. Properties owned by publk agencies, such as a nary, county, state, or the federal government, are not assessable without the approval of the pankular agency and, rarmalty, are not assessed. Certain other parcels used for railroad mainline right-of-way, public utility transmission right-of-way, common areas, and nonprofit organizations (i.e., churches, clubs) are also exempt from assessment. The assessment for mobile home parks will be based upon undedying kt acreage / ~~ SECTION 3 -DISTRICT ANALYSIS A Improvement District Boundary The improvement district includes all of the Ciry of Rancho Cucartanga with the general exception of the Etiwarxta area in the northeasterly sedan of the City. The Etiwanda area is not included in the improvement district because community park design and consiructon in that area is, in general, being flnanrad by devebpnent fees pursuant b the Quimby Act. Tire assessment district txwrxlary is shown on the assessment diagrar, map (Exhibit A). All parcels of real property affected are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxatbo Code, which are on fits in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor In the Hall of Records, 172 West Third Street, San Bernardino, California and which are hereby made a part hereof by reference. B. j?jg(fjct Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Park Improvement DisMct No. 85-PD C Facilities The existing works of Improvement are generaly described as folbws: The construction of Herltage Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, on-site roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, restrooms, equestdan facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, athletic facilities, and walking, jogging antl equestrian trails. The construction of Rod Hill Community Park including ,but not limited fo, grading, planting, Irrigation, on roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, waterscape, rastrooms, senior citizens facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, major lighted athletic facilities, Jogging trail, underground storm drain system, and adjacent public street improvements. 7~ SECTION 4 -ESTIMATE OF COST The Landscaping and l-fighting Act of 1972 permits carrying forward surpluses or recovering deficits In subsequent fiscal year. Costs for the dishict will be reviewed annuaity. Arty surylus cred8ed against assessments or any deficits shall be induded in the assessment for the tollawirg fiscal year. 1988-1989 FISCAL YEAR ESTIMATED COSTS AND BUDGET SUMMARY Deficit from 1987-1988 Budget 57,794 Contributions (interest earned) Redemption Fund (Limited to Pay Bond Debt Service) 29,490 Spedal Reserve Fund (Limited to Pay Bond DeIH Servce) 7.573 29.269 Total Estimated Available Funds County Special Charges 5,665 Administration Charges 90,632 ConsultaMS' Fees -9- Fiscal Agent Charges -0- Debt Service Installment (1/2/89) 311,365 Debt Service Installment (7/2/89) 496,363 Operation and Maintenance s2.24a 966,269 Balance to Assessment 937,000 4 ~~ SECTION 5 -METHOD OF SPREAD The Landscaping end L'ghting Act of 1 a72 indicates that assessments may be apportbned by any formula or method which faidy distributes costs among aA lots or parcels within the District in proportbn to the estimated benefits received. A DsfinMors The District is divided into three categories for the purpose of determining the assessments as toibws: Category A -includes parcels based on the number of existing residential units within certain ranges of parcel size. Category B • includes all parcels not defined in Category A or Category C. Category C -includes exempt parcels. Exempt parcels were discovered by seamhing the County Assessor's computer tapes Tor those parcels that era listed es exempt by the Assessor or which have an assessed value of less that 5500. In conducting this seamh, several parcels were included as exempt that slaw parcel sizes in excess of 1.5 acres and type codes af, for example, residential or agriculture. These parcels were added back ina the rolls and assessed. e. EgtmWa The assessment formula is based on actual land use inlormatbn contained in the current San Bernardino Assessor's computer files and Assessors parcel maps. Category A: All parcels containing existing residential dwelling units and meeting the Tolbwing conditions: Assessor's Number of EzisNng Res. &ue9at>oa Parcel Size Ranne Dwelling Llnits/Parcel 0-4 Lass than 1.5 sores and 1 or more dwelNrp units 5 I.p 1 la 9.5 a4f114 iYld L nr mhfH dweNlrlfl Ilnlfi 6 3.57 to 7.0 acres and 4 or more dwelling units 7 7.01 to 14.0 acres and 0 or more dwelling units 8 14.01 to 25.0 acres end 15 or mae dwelNnp units 9 25.01 acres 8 larger and 26 or more dweNing unNs / O Category A is based on the number of existing residential units. The actual assessment for Borttl Debt Service par existing residential dwelling unit may decrease each year as more residential units are twih within the improvement district. Maintenance costs, however, are expected to Increase annualy and will somewhat otfset the anticipated decrease in assessments due to new development. Category B: All parcels rat defined in Category A or Category C. Category C: All exempt parcels as defined bebw: 1 . all properties currently tex exempt; 2. al! public ownerships; 3. railroad mainline rights-of-way; 4. mayor utility transmission rights-of-wey; 5. mineral rights; F. parcels so small they currently cannot 6e beill upon; 7. all normaly assessable parcels with an assessed valuation of less That 5500 and 1.5 arses or less. and 8. nonprofit organizations li.e., churches). C Summary of Preliminary Assessment Amounts Category A: The preliminary estimated assessment which will be levied annually Is 533.50 per residential dwelling unit for those parcels in category A. Category A parcels contalning more than ane residential dwelling unit will be assessed for an amount equal to 533.50 times the number of dwelling units. 6 ~ ~9 Category B: The assessment which may be levied for parcels witltin Category B shell be acmrdirq b the fdbwirg schedule: Assessors a~@.BaagB. IfH1101I1g0 ASSessmwnt Per Perrnl' 0 - 4 bea Man 1b aCfea ~ 16.75 5 1.5 saes b 3S acres S 50.25 6 3.51 saes to 7.0 ewes 5117.25 7 7.01 acres b 14.0 saes $'184,50 8 14.01 saes b 25.0 apes 2489.00 9 25.01 saes and larger 5837.50 Category C: The assessment ahal be 50.0 br Category C parcels. Some assessments may vary from Me vaNws pfven above by 5.01 or 5.02 eiMer way. - The computer spreads the eaual Balance b Assessment, pules the extra pennlea bfl over from an even spread, and adds them one et a tlrne b 8w assessment roq from the first parcel downward b melts the total assessment spreatl exactly etttrel the Balenp b Assessment. The indNidual 1988.1988 assessments by Assessors parcel number (Ezhlblt B) have been rawininu wni wn on riie ar i.ily nae wnn me City C{eflt of UIB Cary Of fiBrlChO Cucentortpa and are hereby made a pan hereof by this referenp. Dated CRY OF MNCHO CUCAMONGA City Engineer / 6 V R830LOTION NO. ~ b~ ~ ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TY.E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNOAL REPORT FOR THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 19"72, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City clerk of the city an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and/or improvement of said Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85). WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the city Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Ccuncil has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof; requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered as follows: 1. 't'hat *_he Eng;.neer's Bstlmate Of ltemlzed COSts dnd expanses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 2. That the diagrams showing the Assessment Districts referred to an described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment Districts are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 3. That the proposed assessments upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment Districts in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and o= ttre incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 9. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the fiscal year 1988/89 for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings. 11NNU1LL 118888SMSNT R71T88 Per Residential 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/8Q $34.65 $33.50 $33.50 $33.50 vecauL Laid i.5 acr.ea oc iesn 17.32 io.75 16.75 io` .75 Vacant Land 1.51 to 3.5 acres 51.99 50.25 50.?.5 50 .25 vacant Land 3.51 to 7.0 acres 121.].9 117.25 117,25 117 .25 Vacant Land 7.01 to 19.01 ac. 292.59 234.50 239.50 239 .50 Vacant Land 14.01 to 25.0 ac. 985.16 969.00 469.00 969 .00 Vacant Land 25.01 acre and larger 866.92 837.50 837.50 837 .50 TABL& OF CONT&NTS PAGE SEI.TIOtY 1 [1V 111VR111 LVR RLC V{~1 1 SECTION 2 FINDINGS 2 SECTION 3 DISTRICT ANALYSIS 3 SECTION 9 ESTIMATE OF COST 9 SECTION 5 METHOD OF SPREAD 5 EXHIBIT A ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM MAPS SECTION 1 - AOTHORITY FOR REPORT This report for the 1988-1989 Fiscal Year update is prepared pursuant to the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and in compliance with the re~sirements of Article 9, Chapter 1, Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Section 22500 of the Streets and Highway Code. Provisions for this annual assessment are included in chapter 3 of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. The purpose of this report is to set forth findings and the assessment analysis for the annual levy of assessments for the Park and Recreation Improvement District No. 85-PD, thereafter referred to as "the District". This District, utilizing direct benefit assessments, has been created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, and operation of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 2 - BINDINGS Section 22573, Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, requires assessments to be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. The section states: "Tne net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The means of determining whether or not a parcel will benefit from the improvements is contained in the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7, commencing with Section 5000 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California). The 1972 Act also provides for the classification of various areas within an assessment district into benefit areas where, by reason of variations in the nature location, and extent of the improvements, the vari o+±s areas will receive during differing degrees of benefit from the improvements. Benefiting areas consist of all territory receiving substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements and may consist of contiguous or noncontiguous areas. As the assessments are levied on the basis of benefit, they are considered a user's fee, not a tax; and, therefore, are not governed by Article XIIIA. Properties owned by public agencies, such as a city, county, state, or the federal government, are not assessable without the approval of the particular agency and, normally, are not assessed. Certain other parcels used for railroad mainline right-of-way, puhlic utility transmission right-of-way, common areas, and nonprofit organizations (i.e., churches, clubs) are also exempt from assessment. Tha aggpccmant fnr mnh i,la hnma_ narkc will ha ha cad un n_n i~nderly{nom lot acreage. SECTION 3 - DISTRICT )1HALY3I3 A. Improvement District Boundary The improvement district includes all of the Ci[y of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of the Etiwanda area in the northeasterly section of the City. The Etiwanda area is not included in the improvement district because community park design and construction in that area is, in general, being financed by development fees pursuant to the Quimby Act. The assessment district boundary is shown on the assessment diagram map (Exhibit A). All parcels of real property affected are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, which are on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor in the Ha11 of Records, 172 West Third Street, San Bernardino, California and which are hereby made a part hereof by reference. plc ri N m City of Rancho Cucamonga Park Imgrovement District No. 85-PD Facilities The existing works of. improvement are generally described as follocas: 1. The construction of Heritage Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, on-site roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, rest rooms, equestrian facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, athletic facilities, and walking, jogging and equestrian trails. The construction of Red Hill Community Park including , but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, on roads, sidewalks, parking lots, li hrin~ w~rerenapn ect ?-nnme eninr niri?one g.._ .. _ _ .. _ _ facilities, playgroundTequipment, picnic facilities, major lighted athletic facilities, jogging trail, underground storm drain system, and adjacent public street improvements. SBCTZON 4 - ESTZN~ITB OF COST The Landscaping and Lighting Act. of 1972 permits carrying forward surpluses or recovering deficits in subsequent fiscal year. Costs for the district will be reviewed -annually. Any surplus credited against assessments or any deficits shall be included in the assessment for the following fiscal year. 1988-1989 FISCAL YEAR ESTIMATED COSTS AND BDDGET SDMMARY Deficit from 1987-1988 Budget $7,799 Contributions (interest earned) Redemption Fund (Limited to Pay Bond Debt Service) 29,990 Special Reserve Fund (Limited to Pay Bond Debt Service) ~ 573 29,269 Total Estimated Available Fvnds County Special Charges 5,665 Administration Charges 90,632 Consultants' Fees -0- Fiscal Agent Charges -0- Cebt Service Installment (1/2/89) 311,365 Debt Service Installment (7/2/89) 496,363 Operation and Maintenance 62.244 966,269 Balance to Assessment 937, OOC 4 SECTION 5 - 1~THOD Ot SPRE7ID The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 indicates that assessments may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes costs among all lots or parcels within the District in proportion to the estimated benefits received. A. Definitions The District is divided into three categories for the purpose of determining the assessments as follows: Category A - includes parcels based on the number of existing residential units within certain ranges of parcel size. Category B - includes all parcels not defined in Category A or Category C. Category C - lncludes exempt parcels. Exempt parcels were discovered by searching the County Assessor's computer tapes for those parcels that are listed as exempt by the Assessor or which have an assessed valve of less that 5500. L^. cenducrinq rnis searcn~ several parcels were included as exempt that show parcel sizes in excess of 1.5 acres and type codes of, for example, residential or agriculture. These parcels were added back into the rolls and assessed. B. Formula The assessment formula is based on actual land use information contained in the current Sar. Bernardino Assessor's computer files and Assessor's parcel maps. Category A: All parcels containing existing residential dwelling units and meeting the following conditions: 5 Assessor's Number of Existing Res. Rize Rana par. 1 Siz Rangy Dw ling Qn~ts/Parcel 0-4 Less than 1.5 acres and 1 or more dwelling units 5 1.51 to 3.5 acres and 2 or more dwelling units 6 3.51 to 7.0 acres and 9 or more dwelling units 7 7.01 to 19.0 acres and 6 or more dwelling units b ia_Oi to 25.0 acres and i5 or more dweiiing units 9 25.01 acres 6 largez and 26 or more dwelling units Category A is based on the number of existing residential units, The actual assessment for Bond Debt Service per existing residential dwelling unit may decrease each year as more residential units are built within the improvement district. Maintenance costs, however, are expected to increase annually and will somewhat offset the anticipated decrease in assessments due to new development. Category H: All parcels not defined in Category A or Category C. Category C: All exemp*_ parcels as defined below; 1. all properties currently tax exempt; 2, all public owne ships; 3. railroad mainline rights-of-way; 4. major ut.i lity transmission rights-of-way; 5. mineral rights; 6. parcels so small they currently cannot. be built upon; 7. all normally assessable parcels with an assessed valuation of less that $500 and 1,5 acres or• less, and 8. nonprofit organizations (i,e., ch~a rchesl. b C. S+ymmarv of Preliminary Assessment Amounts Category A: The preliminary estimated assessment which will be levied annually is S33.50 per residential dwei ling unit for those pazce is in category A. Category A parcels containing more than one residential dwelling unit will be assessed for an amount equal to 533.50 times the number of dwelling units. Category B: The assessment which may be levied for parce l» within Category H shall be according ro the following schedule: Assessor's Sine. kanae Definition Aec cam nt F Pa rcel* 0 - 4 less than 1 .5 acres S 16. 75 5 1.5 acres to 3.5 acres S 50. 25 6 3.51 acres to 7,0 acres 5117. 25 '7 7.01 acres to 19.0 acres 5234. 50 8 14.01 acres to 25.0 acres $469. 00 9 25.01 acres and larger 5837. 50 Category C: The assessment shall be $0.0 for Category C parcels. * Some assessments may vary from the values given above by S.O1 or 5.02 either way. The computer spreads the actual Balance to Assessment, carries the extra pennies left over from a:i even spread, and adds them one at a time tc t*.<_ assessment roll from the first parcel downward to make ttie total assessment spread exactly 2qua1 the Balance to Assessment. The individual 1989-1999 assessments by Assessor's parcel number (Exhibit B) have been tabulated and are on file at City Hall with the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and are hereby made a part hereof by this zefe rence. pared rang n~ g~p'eo rvr~oNCa City Engineer 7 RESOLUTION NO. $ Q A RESOLUTION OFTHE CRY COUNCIL OF THE CRYOF RANCHO CUCAMONC~.A, CAUFOFINIA, DECLARING RS INTENTION TO LEW AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) AND SETTING ATIME AND PLACE f-0R PUBLIC HEARING THEREON WHEREAS, the Ciry Council of the Ciry of Rancho Cucartwnga, California, has previously formed a special assessment district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972', being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Caiforrda, i.. what is known a, designated as'PARK AN'u ReGREATiON IMPROVEMENT Die' T HiCi (HERITAGE AND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARKS). WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to provide for the annual levy of assessments for the next ensuing fiscal year to provide for the costs and expenses necessary to pay debt service on the bonds issued and costs for annual maintenance for the Assessment District; and WHEREAS, at this time there has been presented and approved by this CNy Council, the Engineer's Report, as required by law, and this City Council is desirous of continuing with the proceedings for said annual levy. NOW, THEREFORE, R LS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true aM coned. nFr:l AR6TIr1N AF INTFNTrnN SECTION 2: That the public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this legislative body, to undenake proceedings for the annual levy and collection of assessments for the payment of costs and expenses for the following designated improvements, including debt service on bonds issuetl to assist in financing said improvements: Construction of park and recreational improvements in Heritage and Red Hill Community Parks, including but not limited to, land preparation, including grading, landscaping and irrigation systems, together with appurtenant work. That no new Improvements or any substantial changes in existing improvements are proposed as a pan of these procoedings. sOUNOaFtI=c frF rdutNT~Naur. ~I~rarFr SECTION 3: That said works of improvement are of direct benefit to the progenies within the boundaries of said Assessment Districi, which Assessment District the legislative body previously declared to be the area benefited by said works of improvement, and for paniculars reference is made to the boundary map as prevously approved by this legis- ~ lative body, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the Clry Clerk and open for public inspection, and designated by the name of this Assessment District. /~/ cm ctxfNCIL RESOLtJrIDN PARK 8 RECREATION DISTRICT P0.85 May 4, 1988 Page 2 SECTION d: That the "Report" of the Engineer, as preliminarity approved M' this legislative body, is on file with the Ciry Clerk and open for publk Inspection. Reference is made to said "Report" for a full and detailed description of the existing works of improvement, the boundaries of the Assessment Oisirict and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable bts and pamels of land within the Assessment District. SECTION 5: NOTICE IS HEREBY GNEN THAT WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH DAV OF JUNE, 1988, AT THE HOUR OF 750 O'CLOCK P.M., IN THE MEETING PLACE OF THE CITY COl1NCIL AT LIONS PARK COM\1UNfTY CENTER, 9181 BASELINE ROAD, RANCHO GJCAMONGA, CA, IS THE TIME AND PLACE FDSFD BV TWS tEGISUITNE BODV FOR HEARING PROTESTS l1R OBJECTIONS N REFERENCE TO THE ANNIAAL LEW OFASSFSSti1BJT5 ANDTO ANYOTHFA MATTFJiS CONTAINED W THIS RESOLUTION. ANY PERSONS WFp VVISIi TOOBJECT TO THE PROCEEDINGS ORTHE AM1l1AL LEW SHOtM-D FlLE A WRRTEN PROTEST MATH THE CfTV CLEPx PRK)R TO THE TIME SET FOR THE Pl1BUC HEARING. SECTION 6; That the City Cbrk Is hereby authorized and dkeged to give notice es causing a copy of this Resolulbn to be published in the Deity Repod, a newspaper of general n„infin wi\Fin IFn /yin,. nn1A n,A\Gnn\Inn \n M iv. nInIM n \ I..wn \An.. I..n I~n\ An...... n," ,n .. ":.." ,~ the date set for the publk hearing. V SECTION 7: For any and all informaton relating to these proceedings, including information relating to protest procedure, your attention is directed to the person desgnated bebw: Jerry B. Fulwood, Resource Center Coordinator P. O. Box 907 Rancho Cucantorga, CA 91730 Telephone: (71d) 999-1851 / ~~ R830LIITION NO. ~ 0 ~~ Uv A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-SS) AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING THEREON WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special assessment district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act cf 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Hignways code of the State of California, in what is known an designated as "PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (HERITAGE FvVD RED HILL CONA7lJN ITY PARKS) . WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to provide for the annual levy of assessments for the next ensuing fiscal year to provide for the costs and expenses necessary to pay debt service on the bonds issued and costs for annual maintenance for the Assessment District; and WHEREAS, at this time there has been presented and approved by this City Council, the Engineer's Report, as required by law, and this City Council is desirous of continuing with the proceedinys for said annual levy. NOW, THEREFORE, ZT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: correct. SECTION ~: That the above recitals are all true and SECTZnN 2; That the public interest and convenience requi__*es, and it is the intention of this legislative body, to undertake proceedings for the annual levy and collection of assessments for the payment of costs and expenses for the following designated improvements, including debt service on bonds issued to assist in financing said improvements: Construction of park and recreational improvements in Heritage and Red Hill Community Parks, including but not limited t_o, land preparation, including grading, landscaping and irriaat inn svstema. tnaether with annurtenant work. That no new improvements or any substantial changes in existing improvements are proposed as a part of these proceedings. S ,FCTroN 3: That said works of improvement are of direct benefit to the properties within the boundaries of said Assessment District, which Assessment District the legislative body previously declared to be the area benefited by said works of improvement, and for particulars reference is made to the boundary map as previously approved by this legislative body, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and open for public inspection, and designated by the name of this Assessment District. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION PARK b RECREATION DISTRICT PD-85 M.ay 9, 1988 Page 2 sP.^T~TON 4; That the "Report" of the Engineer, as preliminarily approved by this legislative body, is on file with the City Clerk and open for public inspection. Reference is made to said "Report" for a full and detailed description of the existing works of improvement, the boundaries of the Assessment District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the Assessment District. SECTION S; NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 1988, A'T THE HOUR OF 7:30 O'CLOCK P.M., IN THE MEETING PLACE OF THE CITY COUNCTL AT LIONS PARR COMMUNITY CENTER, 4161 9ASELINE ROAD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA, IS THE TIME AND PLACE FIXED BY THIS LEGISLATIVE BODY FOR HEARING PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS IN REFERENCE TO THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS AND TO ANY OTHER MATTERS CONTAINED IN THIS RESOLUTION. ANY PERSONS WHO WISH '1'U OBJECT TO THE PROCEEDINGS OR THE ANNUAL LEVX SHOULD FILE A WRITTEN PROTEST WITH THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE TIME SET FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING. SECTION 6: That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and d'rected to give notice as causing a copy of this R.esol ution to be published in the Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation within the City; said publication to be completed not less than ten (10) days prior to the date set for the public hearing. SF~CTION is For any and Ali inrormation relating to these proceedings, including information relating to protest procedure, your attention is directed to the person designated below: Jerry B. Fulwood, Resource Center Coordinator P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Telephone: (719) 999-1851 ORDINANCe NO. 343 AN ORDINANCE OF 1718 CITY COONCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCEIO CD GMINCA, GLI LORNIA, AMERDIl;i SELECTED SECTIONS OF CMPPERS 70.52 AND 10.64 AND REPEALING LNAPfSR 10.68 PERTAINING 1U R~DLATIONS ON TAE PARKING OR STANDING OF VIDIICLB3 THE CITY 00llNCIG OP THS CITY OP RANIXO QI G7UNGA 0065 HEREBY ORIWIN AS POLLOHS: SECTION 1: Section 10.52.050 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code ie amended to rend, in rorde end figures, ae follows: 10.52.050 parking OverreiRbt Vehicles - Weight Linitetion. A. No person ahtll pork or leave standing airy commercial vehicle, ae the sue i^ defined in the Cal ifarnia Vehicie Code, having e manufacturer's genes vehicle reight rating of tcn thousand (10,000) pounds or sore on airy street, or portion thereof, locnted in a reaidentinl district rithin [he City. E. Whore slgna or aarkinga have bean placed directing compl innce with the provisions of thin subeaction, no person shall perk or leave standing on airy public street, higtarey, pat7oray or property dedicated to nuhlic use in am »a: Aenri¢1 di er.i ,.r with .. rl.e City, eery vehicle, motor truck, trailer, semi-trailer or combination thereof, having a menuf acturer'e gross vehicle reight rating of one and one-half (1-1/2) tone or more, or a width in exce se of eighty (RD) inches. C. Where eigne or merkinge have been placed directing compl lance rith the prow iaions of this subsection, no person shell park or leave standing on nlry public etreei. highray, perlotaq or property dedicated to public use, in airy comerciel or industrial district of the City, alry vehicle, motor truck, trailer, swi-trailer or combination thereof, having a manufacturer's gross vehicle reight rating of three (3) tone or more, or a ridth in ezcese of eighty (80) inches. ... ... prv,.uvuo .,. - ~''°- ' th i6 aetti4T eh aii rwt ep/iV i4 Ehc foiior in¢: 1. Public emergency vehicles; 2. Vehicles parked for the purpo at of asking pick-ups and deliveries rhile actively involved in such activity; /(y? Ordinance No. 343 Page 2 3. 4ehicl es parked in rnnne ct ion with, end in aid to, the performance of a service to, or on, a property in the block where such vehicle ie parked while actively i:rvolved in such service attivity; and, 4. Public utility vehicles; and 5. Where sine have been erected author iz ins tam oorwrv ww rkinv of such vehicles. V SECTION 2: Section 30.52.060 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, ae follwa: 10.52.060 Parking of traiiere or semi-trailers. A. No person shell park or leave etending airy trailer or semi- trailer upon e:ry public street, highway, alley, parkrey oc property dedicated to public use, or airy portion thereof, unl ees the trailer or aeni-trailer ie at ell Linea while so parked and etending attached to a vehicle capable of saving such trailer or semi-trailer. B. This see[ion shell :rot apply to treilera or aeni-[reilere in the proce ee of being loaded or unloaded while actively imroived in such activity or trailers or semi-treilera perked and left etending in connection with, end in aid to, the performance of e service to, or on, a property in the block in which each vehicle SECTION 3: Section 10.52.080 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code ie hereby mmended to read, in words and figures, as follow e: 10.52.080 Penalty for Infractions - Tov Avey. Any act or omission declared unl maful by the prw ieiona of this Chapter ie an infraction punieha6le by a firm net to ezceed that set by the current uniform countywide bail schedule establ iehed pureunnt to the terms of the California Vehicle Code. Any vehicle left perked or standing in violation of the prw ieiona of this Chapter shall be eubj act to being t wed away in accordance with those regal etiona set forth in the Cal ifornie Vehicle Code pertaining to the [wing of vehicles from public streets and property. l Nl.'1'I IIN 4! Vu nl~nn 1_I_I 1_~4_f_17_f_t n__i f_„n_ _Vann_F n_ (`n na~n n_n ne M.n i_n_i_nat /~n M_n_ .. .. .~ .. p.. ..-.. r ie hereby repealed. SECTION 5: Section 10.64.050 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code ie hereby amended to reed, in words end figures, ee follwe: / 8~ Ordinance No. 343 Page 3 10.64.050 Penalty for Infractions. Any act or omission declared unlawful by the prw ieiona of this Chapter ie an infraction punishable by a fine rwt to exceed that set by the current uniform countywide bail schedule eetebl iehed put ~~an[ to the terns of the California Vehicle Code. SECTION 6: Chmpter 10.68 of [he Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code ie hereE~ repealed. SECTION 7: The City Council de cl area that, should airy prw ieion, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared iwal id b9 e:ry final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of airy preemptive legi el scion, the remaining prw ieione, ee etione, paragraphs, sentence e, and words of this Ordinance e6a11 remain in full force end effect. SECTION 8: The City Clerk shell certitq is the passage of this Ordirence and shall rtuae the seats to he published within fifteen (15) days after ice passage at leant once in The Deily Report, a nerspeper of generei circulation publ iahed in the City of Ontario, California, snd circulated in the City of Eancho Cucmonga, California. /O~ CiTY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: Mqy 4, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Enaineer r,~, ~t Subiect: Recommendation to establish speed Baits on Ylctoria Street and Nilson Avenue 1t is recommended that Section 10.20.020 of the Municipal Code be amended to provide for speed limits of 35 MPH on Victoria between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue; a 45 MDH speed limit on Mtlson between Ametlryst Avenue and Naven Avenue; a 40 MPH speed limit on Nilson between Haven Avenue and Z00 feet east of Canistel Avenue. BACK6RgMD/AWII.YSIS: Continuing surveillance of streets in the City has resulted to conducting traffic and engineering surveys 9or the purpose of establishing speed limits acording W Sections 22357, 22358 and 40801-40805 of the California Yehlcle Code. The Yehlcle Code allows titles to set speed limits of other than 25 MPH or 55 MPH in accordance with such surreys in nrAer Yn snw nwrf eater ne~.6t/eF fir •w.enn.Aln •nA .....An.~• ....~ _.. ..._ ____..__._ _.._ .r-.- whlch is required under basic State speed law. This speeA then becomes the basis for enforcement, eliminating the extreme discretion which otherwise could occur. Such a survey, less than 5 years old, is also required where radar is used for enforceaent. Surveys as required above have been conducted on the aforementioned streets. The Surveys involved the detenatnation of the prevailing speed of existing traffic by the use of radar, an analysis of the recent accident history and a search for any conditions not apparent to drivers which would require a reduced speed. The results of these surveys are sumaarized in the attached table. After review of these results, 1t was found that the safety record of the streets are within expected levels and there are no unusual conditions not awarent to driYi rS. Th11i, the nbcorvad prevailing epnade w-nei the predominant consideration in detenalning the speed limit. / Sk CCSR May 4, 1988 Page 2 CCMCIUSIpI: A speed li~ait should be established that would be considered reasonable 6y nost of the drivers on the xtreet and xtill provide for effective enforcea~ent. A speed limit such as this is set at, Tn oast cases, the first 5 MPH increcent below what 85 percent of the speeds drivers are doing. The proposed speed limits will be exceeded by 8 to 30E of the drivers observed, thus these limits should provide an effective tool for law enforcement. Respectf submitted, cc: Clyde Boyd, Chairwwn-Public Safety Ca~isslon Attachment /g wwwn o - jai: ~ ~ _ f0~1 WW2> y WvRr NN NNNh ~ L ~ O } OPO p ~ a a WKM OO II , O P f OppY ! Y j ~ T V • . ny: R ^ = X i ? Oy U~ p pep_ ~ C a. W ~ j -~a N rv iM1! tn20Y w~ ' ~i O: a!! m° i' _~~ p erpp - a° °~a d~~; ~ a~ ~~,r C m~ .... ..~...... a Y y ~~V`~ Le• ~N! W I ~o~~ i a.7 ~ i j m r $ S OI Y WY g :~ r PmOY i '! ~ ~` J ~ p ~m~„ ~~ m mmmr~ ~ i ^ ~ " ~ C __~ o f ~ R F P ~ r ! ? 2 . g ro . ZZ yayj yp yp , Y ~SNe T N ry m m m N ~~AT Y ! X f pp C L x ~ ~ yi TI ``ly ¢~y~ ` ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ i Y iO L 00~~ Il lp ~~ ~~ r Y Y RJ Oi . Z !H_ • ! Y CB W (C ?~ ~~~ ~ ~~~4 :~ .b coda e ~~ ~m~~ ... rCrrr...... rrrr.... .. . e .. ___.... ~~y{ gQ~ ~ yy y~ 4~~~ ~#~~~ 8 tl~78E ~ s~~0 g ~~~g ~~w :~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~8m ~ ~~~~ a...r....rr:....rrr.... ~~ ~wE ~ R~~~ s ~e JWm ~~ ~w ~I~~J: ~ ~~~~ y ~~gC~ ! p rvreo i i ! 6 ! ro~ B ~ C ~ ro ` E ~ ~~E@ e ~ ~~ ~ C Y W O 3W Z ! W ~ OS O ! O 0 " s ~ e3 ~"3is . as ~ s 3 ~ ~ ~% a~3 ? € .. ~ ~€ ~ 8 ~~ ` ~6 ``ee y ~ ! L J 62 :J ! UR J ' _ ! ~ ~ ~ / ~. ORDINANCE N0. 3 ~~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OUNCIL OF THE C[TY OF RANCHO CUCANON6A, CALIFORNIA, LTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAIN)NCd CITY CODE, REOAROINS PRAIA FACIE SPEED LIMITS UPON CERTAIN CITT STREETS A. Reclkis (1) California Vehicle Code Section 22357 provides that this City Council gay, by ordinance, set priaw facie speed 11~tts upon any portion of any street net a stale highway. (11) The Cfty Traffic Engineer has conduckd an engineering and traffic survey, of certain streets within the City of Rancho Cucaonga which streets as specified in Part B of this Ordtnante. (iii) The dakr~inations concerning prier faele speed ltd is set forth to Part B, below, are based upon the engineering and trafife survey identified to Section A (tt), above. Ordlnante NOM, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1bN011 DOES HEREBY ORDAIk AS FOLLONS: Section 1 Setts nn in. T1 n9n h~r~hv Ie arnA~A .~ •A. n.~.~~ ~.~~ _-_. .... to read, in words and flguros, as follows: ~~~~ ....~ y~~ 10.20.020 Decrease of stale low awxleaw s d. It 1s dekrwined by City Counc reso u on an upon as s o an eng neering and traffic investigation that the speed perwitkd by skk law 1s greater than is reasonable or safe under the conditions found to exist upon such streets, and 1t is declared that the prlex facie speed 11eHt shad 6e as set forth to this section on those streets or parts of streets destgnakd in this section when signs are ereckd giving notice hererof: Naag of Street or Portion Affetkd 1. Archibald Avenue - Banyan to North end 2. Archibald AVP flIM - Fnur#h Gi.•u. .~ Banyan Street 3. Arrow Route - Baker to Naven Declared Pr1w Facie Spee6 L1Nt (MPH) 50 45 45 t~ ORDINANCE N0. ~ [~l AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO116A, CALIFORNIA, SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMOIIGII CITY CODE, REGARDING PRIIiA FACIE SPEED LIMITS UPON CERTAIN CITY STREETS A. Recitals (i) California Vehicle Code Section 2235) provides that this City Council may, by ordinance, set prima faete speed limits upon any portion of any street not a state highway. (it) The City Traffic Engineer has conducted an engineering and traffic survey, of certain streets within the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga which streets as speclffed in Part B of this Ordinance. (i11) The detenelnattons concerning prlwa facie speed limits set forth to Part B, below, are based upon the engineering and traffic survey Identified in Section A (11 ), above. B. Ordinance NOM, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA GOES HEREBY ORDAIN As FOLLOMS: Section I Cam nn to N1 nvn 6a aA.. ~. wAwA ._.. •w. n.-.~- n to read, in cords and figures, as follows: ~~~ ..,.,...,., ~~~~ sya ,.i;~ Cow 10.20.020 Decrease of state low maximums d. It is determined by City Caunc reso u on an upon as s o an eng veering and traffic investigation that the speed permitted by state law is greater than is reasonable or safe under the conditions found to exist upon such streets, and it 1s declared that the prima facie speed limit shall De as set forth in this section on khose streets or parts of streets designated in this section when signs are erected giving notice hererof: Name of Street or Portion Affected 1 L 3. Archl6ald Avenue - Banyan to North end APthS paid AVAnuP_ - inurtn Crrmi in Banyan Street Arrow Route - Baker to Haven Declared Prime Facie Speed Limit (ppH) 50 45 45 ~~ CCSR Ordinance May 4, 1988 Page 2 Declared Prima Facie Name of Street or Portion Affected Speed Limit (MPH) 4. Danyan Street from Beryl Street tc London Avenue 35 5. Banyan Street - from west City limits to Beryl Street 40 6. Base Line Road - Carnelian to Haven 40 7. Base Line Road - Herviosa to Haven 45 8. Base Line Road - Nest City limits to Carnelian 45 9. Beryl Street - Banyan to end 45 30. Beryl Street - 800' north of Lea»n to Banyan 40 11. Carnelian Street - Foothill to end 45 12. Center Avenue - Foothill Blvd. to Church Street 40 13. Church Street - from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue 40 14. Church Street - Haven to Elm 40 15. Eighth Street - Grove to Haven 45 16. Etiwanda Avenue - Foothill to Highland 45 17. Grove Avenue -Eighth to Foothill 40 iii. riaren Avenue - riigni and co iiii sun ou 19. Hellman Avenue -Foothill Lo Alta Law Dr. 35 20. Hellman Avenue - 500' north of Manaantta to Valley View 40 21. Hellman Avenue - 6th to foothill 45 22. Hermosa Avenue - Base Line Road to Nilson Ave. 45 23. Hermosa Avenue - Nilson to un Valley Dr. 40 24. Highland Avenue - Amethyst to Archibald 35 25. Highland Avenue - from Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue 35 26. Highland Avenue -from Hermosa Avenue t0 800' west of Haven 45 27. Hillside Road -from Ranch Gate to Amethyst Street 35 28. Lemon Avenue -Archibald Avenue to 29. riaVeii Avenue Lemon Avenue -Jasper St. to Beryl St. 4l! 35 30. Ninth Street - Baker Ave. to Archibald Ave. 40 31. Rochester Ave. - Foothill Blvd. to Base Line Road 50 /~~ CCSR Ordinance May 4, 1988 Page 3 Declared Priwa Facie Nave of Street or Portion Affected Speed Liw1t (!PH) 32. San Bernardino Road - frow Vineyard Avenue *.e Archibald Avenue 35 33. Sapphire Street - Banyan t0 end 45 34. Sapphire Street - 19th to Lewon 40 35. Spruce Avenue - E1^ Avenue to base Line Rd. 40 36. Terra Vista Parkway -Church to Bel pine 40 37. Turner Avenue - Eighth to Foothill 45 38. Turner Avenue (Herwosa Ave.) - Foothill to Base Line Road 45 39. Yictoria Street - Archibald Ave. to Raaana 35 40. Victoria Street - frew Etlwanda Avenue to Route 15 40 41. Victoria Park Lane 35 42. Victoria Nlndrows Loop (north 8 south) 35 43 Vineyard Avenue - ChurcA to Base Line Rd. 40 44. Vineyard Avenue - frow 8th Street to Foothill Blvd. 45 45. Nhiitraw Avenue - Etiwnda to east City uwiu ao 46. Nilson - Awethyst Ave. to Archibald Ave. 40 47. ... Nilson -Archibald Ave. to Haven Ave. ~ ~. a 45 ,... _ - - - .~. ;H :~C CaaC east ~~ Canlstei~Ave.~ 40 (Ord. 169 Section I (part), 1982: Ord. 39 Section 5.1, 1978). Rancho Cucananga 5/82 124 (i) Both sixty-five (65) wiles per hour and fifty-five (55) wiles per hour are speeds which are wore than are reasonable or safe; (it) The wiles per hour as stated are Lhe priaw facie speeds which are wost appropriate to facilitate the orderly wovewent of traffic and are speed liwits which are reasonable and safe on said streets or portions thereof; (111) The wiles per hour stated are hereby declared to be the prlwa Ian1u n nnA t1~1 ~n n •IA ..1....,... -J •....~.. aWcv ..un ra v.. ac.o ar. cc bi, aIN CCSR Ordinance Na,y 4, 1988 Page 4 (iv) The Traffic Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to install appropriate signs upon said streets giving notice of the priaw facie speed limit declared herein. Section 2 The City Clerk shall certify t0 the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be pubUshed as required by law. Section 3 The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the save to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Oaily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published 1n the City of nO~aTC'aTT'iornla, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROYED, and ADOPTED this 4th day of May, 1988. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: enn s u yor ATTEST: every u e e I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meetin of the Council of tht• City of RaMho Cucamonga held on the 4th day of May 1988, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 4th day of May, 1988. Exec3ted this 3th day of May, i9@A at Rantho r~~c~ng. ralifo.nia. ~, every u e e y e l ~i~- - CITY ON RANCHO Cl7CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 4, 1988 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM; Brad Buller. City Planner BY: Dino Putrtno, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLIW AMENDMENT 88-OlA reques o amen a nera an an sL~O"e l~ap'}^ran Office to Neighborhood Cawnercial for approximately 3.45 acres of land, located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Hellman Avenue - APN: 208- 202-13,14. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND OEYELOPMENT DISTRICT eve opmen s r e s p rew ice/Professlonalm(OP) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC) for approximately 3.45 acres of land, located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Hellman - APN: 208-202-13,14. I. BACKGROUND: The applicant has submitted this General Plan and ~7 nA e~ri rt amandment reouesting a change of the existing Land use designation from Office to neignoornuu~ Commercial. The applicant contends that this change is necessary because current market conditions do not warrant the development of this site for office use. R traffic study and market feasibility analysis have been submitted as attachments to this application. The Planning Commission reviewed this proiect at their meeting of January 27, 1988. This item was originally scheduled for City Council review at the meeting of February 17, 1980. However, upon written request of the applicant, this item was continued to the March 16 public hearing. In addition, upon further written request of the applicant, this item was continued to the May 4, 1988 City Council meeting. As of this request, the applicant has discussed with staff passible alternatives to the subJect project such as the concept of a "Oevalopment AareemenL". The applicant was advised that staff work on a Development Agreement proposal would 'nave La 6e initiated by direction of City Council. A draft aggreMnent developed by the applicant and staff would then be reviewed by the P1anM ng Commission prior to fornwl City Council consideration. l~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GENERAL PLAN PMENDMENT 88-OlA - CARTER May 4, 1488 Page 2 On July 16, 1986, the City Council directed that five "Office/Professional" sites and ore commercial site be studied by the Planning Commission for possible General Plan land use changes. The subJect project site was one of the five sites identified by the City Council. The Planning Commission reviewed the five sites at their meeting of Augus4 27, 1986. in the review of the Base Line/Nellman site, three alternative land uses were considered: 1) Medium Residential, 2) Neighborhood Comaercial, and 3) Office. The Commission determined that multi-family residential would not be appropriate adjacent to Base Line and therefore, was not in favor of the first alternative. Likewise, the Commission was opposed to the second alternative of Neighborhood Commercial. The Commission concurred that the site was a difficult one to develop, and their concern was that Lo redesignate the site to a more intense commercial use would only magnify the aiready existing problems. The consensus of the Commission was to recommend to Lhe City Council that this site retain its Office designation. At their meeting of November 5, 1986, the City Council reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendations regarding the various sites for possible redesignation. The City Council concurred wtth the Planning Commission's analysis and the Council chose not to change the site's existing "Office" designation. II. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The current Droposal, as requested by Mr. Carter, is identical LO the One reviewed Dy the Pl anning Commission and City Council in 1986. In reviewing the current proposal, the Commission arrived at the same conclusion as they did in their 1986 review. The Planning Commission found that the sub,f ect property's physical design constraints render Lhe site incapable of adequately handling the increased land use intenstties resulting from a land use redesignation to Neighborhood Commercial without significant adverse impacts resulting to adjacent properties. Therefore, the Planning Commission, at the meeting of January 27, 1988, adopted a Resolution recommeadtng that the City Councii deny the proposed General Plan and Development District Amendments. RECOMMENDATION: At its meeting of January 27, 1988, the Planning _on•m,~Ten ~ec,~enden the rtry rouncil deny General Plan Amendxw_nt 88- OlA and Development Distrtct Amendment 87-11 and adopt a Resolution of Denial. Since this meeting, the applicant stated that they are interested in forming a "Development Agreement". Staff recommends that should the City Council wish to consider a development agreement for General Plan Amendment 88-OlA and Development District Amendment 87-11, it is recommended the City Council provide staff with any significant agreement provisions which are desired and that the applicant be /~7 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88-OlA -CARTER May 4, 1988 Page 3 instructed to begin work on a development agreement with staff for review by the Planning Cmnission. If the Council does not wish to consider a development agreement, then it is recommended that the Council uphold the recommendation of the Planning Comulsslon to deny General Plan Awendment 88-OlA and Development District Anm!ndmm•nt 87-11 and ado; the attacfied Resolution of Denial. Respectfully submitted, Y Brad Bul er City Planner BB:DP:Js ~7S AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CNITIEA, TOLSTOY, EMERICK, NCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY r e i w + --carried P. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88-OlA - J. - YM MMC If A0Y „bra a„ i e. •n ~rnca w netgnuurrpoa GnalaerClal' ror approxlmaLely 3.45 ac reS of land, located on the southwest corner of Base line Road and Helltaan Avenue - APN: 208-202-33, la. ENYIRONIEMTAL ASSESSMENT AND OEYELOPIEHT DISTRICT AMENDIENi 87-11 - regws ante ve opaten s r c s rots ce rofesslonal (DP) to Neighborhood Ca~erctal (NC) for approxlMtely 3.~5 acres of land, located on tM southtest Corner of Base Lfne Rad and Nellman Avtnw - APN: 208-2O~i-13, it. Bruce Cook, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Coawissloner ToisWy gwstioned Mr Rougeau regarding the widening of the project on Hellman Avenue. Mr. Rougeau stated that it would remain Mo lanes but it would be d such wider two lanes and a taore easily traversed two lanes over the railroad track. There is a storm drain that will De proposed in the City's Eudget in the next year that will accoatplish the tanrnvr..w~ ^f :~~ drat ^':! ^"^~~:: -t w~a ra i i rwd 50 Lnat the Streit C1n be widened to its normal width there and so that there will be roata for c left-turn lane into this property. Chairtsan Mk:Niel opened the public blaring. Mr. James E. Carter, appllwnt, presented an analysis of the proposal regarding three specific lssws, including land use, the appropriateness of the site for coatakrcial designation, traffic access, traffic circulation and ingress/egress tssws related to site specific criteria, and market analysis to deteratine the economic feasibility of the site fora co~arcial rather than office use. Ms. Catharine R. Clayter, 7360 Lariet Ptace, 1'D, stated her concerns were the traffic increase, crieua, and Darkina. She :.Meld rat..",er sae a ~!edical building going in rather than a shopping center. Mr. Mike Mitchell, stated his office is an the southeast corner of the intersection and stated he would rather see coataxrclal rather than office use which generates more traffic. Planning Conwissfon Minutes -25- January 2T, 1988 /9~ Ms. Elizabeth Brandt, 9188 Base line, stated there 1s an extrcaN aaaunt of traffic on Base Line. She would prefer to see Medical or dental rather than coaasercial. Mr. Ray Young, Urban Research Associates, stated this site has severe site constraints rcgardlrtg land use, zoning or developing. TM need for careful consideration in tM General Plan designation is needed naw. Lhairsan MtNte1 ciosed LM public Maring. Conaissioner ENerlck stated that office vacancy for lire entire region is quite high. Coartlssioner Eawfrick feels that NelghborMod Co~rerctal is not appropriate for tM site as is Office/Professional but it should reawin what it Ss for now. Caw•isstoner Tolstoy stated M concurred with Cosissioner EaNrtck. Ca~lsstaner Chttiea stated tM intensity of tM use was another aspect next to tM apartarnts. A neighborhood coasrroial center is Qu1te an intense use and 1s not coagatible. Office Professional N{y not D! viable use at this tine but tM use suss be reserved. TM proposed cosswercial developaent 1s real appropriate to LM neighborMod and to tM traffic concerns. CoNNtssioner Chitia does not support tM asN!ndgnt change. ChairNan MCMieI stated tM Office Prolessianal does not develop rapidly and they Nust protect the sites accordingly. Chairrn McNtel stated he did not support the change. Coawissioner Cnitlea agved TO rarward a recoNwndacion or denial w lore City Council for General Plan ANendax!nt 88-D1A and DevelopaN;nt District PNendaKnt 87-i1, Cowaissioner Eaxtrick seconded tM Notion. Motion carried by tM following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHYTIEA, EMERICK, MCMIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLN(ESLEY + ~ a • e t f OlD BUSINESS --carried Q. EAST AVENUE WAIL - CITATION - Review of a proposed pariNeter wall a ong as venue or a rcs dential subdivision of 74 single faNily lots on 32.6 acres of land 1n tM law Residential District 12-4 dwe111ng units per acre) of the Etlwanda Spet1/1c Plan, locattd on the east side of East Avenue at Catalpa Street - APN: 227-071-07, 11 and 20. Planning CoNNission Minutes -^26. January 27, 1988 / ~~ CIiY OF RANCHO CI:CAil10NGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 27, 1988 T0: Chalnean and Meabers of the Pt anni nq Coaad sston FROM: Brad Buller, Lity Planner BY: Bruce Cook, AssoClata Planner ~~us~p~ y= ~+ F? ? 19%% SUBJECT: ENYIRONIRiNTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN ANElg7MENT 88-OlA nau a nera an an se p rom Offlct' to 'iM!1gh0oMOOd Caaarrctal" for approxiawttly 3.45 acres of land, lacatt0 on the southwest corner of Bast L1ne Rad and Htilsum Avenue - APN: 208-202.13,14. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSiIENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AIR7~IENT 87-i1 - JAMES E. GARTER - A rN1Wtl LO mend e eve o r c p Offlee/Professional (OP) to Netghborbood Commarcial (MC) for approxia>rteiy 3.45 acres of Tand, totaled on ~o zauthwtst eorner of Base Ltne Road end He11ANn Avenue - APN: 200-202-13,14. noiinii.T: Ine applicant, James E. Carttr, has 1nlNated Doth a nera tan and Developaunt Districts Amendatnt to change the existing Office deslgnatton to NelghDorhood Comaerctat /or 3.45 acres of land on the southwest corner of Best L1nt Road and Hellman Avenue. fie Planning Coaaalsston prtviously considered redestgnating the site fra Office to Ntlghborhood Coa~erctal in August, 1986. At that Nme, tht Cwm/salon recaaawndtd that the site reUin its Office destgnatfon. fie Co~isslon /alt here were a number of design dl/ficultits assoefated with this s1U and was not 1n favor o/ a Co~arcfal redtsignatton wh1cA could poLent1a11y lncrtast the land use 1nGnslty of tht site, and therofon, augnlfy tht tdentlfled design difficulties in its dtvN opaMlnt. Although stiff Ms required Lht suDmltU1 of traffic and aNrket studies, a further analysis of this proposal has not found any aDDreNaple LhanQe df condlLlOnS Si nia Lhe ieei rev?eY !„ August ilI 1980. merlfore, Staff has provided Resolutions of Dental for this pro)eet for the Commisstons review and considtratlon. [I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION; A. Action Re ested: Anknd the Generai Plan from "Off tee" to e o 00 oamlerclal', amend the Deveiopment Districts Map from Office/Professional (OP to NelghDOrhaod Caawerctal (NC , and issuance of a Negative Declaration, ~~ PLANWI NG LOM4I SSI0~ GAFF REPORT RE: GPA88-OlA, DDA 87-11 January 27, 1988 Page 2 B. Location: Southwest corner of Base Line Road and Nellawtn wA- nue- C, parcel 51ze: Approxlagtely 3,45 acres. D. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning; North - Church and single faaHly residential; Low Residential (2-4 dw111ng units per acre). SoutA - Mult1-fa~ily apartwent ca~plex; Nedtuw Resldentlai (8-14 dre111ng units per ecrc). East -Service Station and Office Buildings; (Office/professional). Wst - Library and Dons Park; Law Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre). E. General Plan Dn1 nations: - c North - Low Residential (2-4 dwe111ng units per acre) South - Medtu~ Residential (8-14 dw111ng uMts per acre) East -Office Nest - Ctvtc/ColaUnity and Parks F. Site Charoctertstlca• rh. q!.. !e c - G ..iw .nnuei weeos a gran es an gen y slopes to a southerly direction. There arc no existing structures on Lhe s1 U, but a two-way access drtve with wedtan island b/sects the property to a north to south direcLlon to provldt access for the Witt-farally apartawrnt coaglex directly adlacent to the south of the protect siU. Itt. BACKGROUND: Dn July 16, 1986, Lhe C1ty Council directed that flue ce esslonal sites and one Caaaerclal site be studied Dy the Pianntng Coaatsston for posslDle General Plan Land Use changes. The City Council d/d not g1w any special A ternattve Lnd uses to be considered, but requested that Lhe Planning Caaalss/on study the sites ident/fled and prov/de recoaawndatlons to the C14y Council. fie pro,1ect s1Le at the southwest corner of @ase ! ine Road and N2H~:n Avenue dos o„- of thG five sites identifild Dy the C1ty Council. fie Planning Casa/sston reviewed the flue sites at their aneting of August 27, 1986. In the review o/ the Base L1ne/Nellawn site, three alternative land uses were considered: 1) Me41u~a Residential T)NeighDOrhood Cawsercial 310ffice. The Coaaission determined that nsuitl-faarlly resldentlai would not De appropriate adjacent to Base L1ne and therefore, was not 1n favor of the first alternative. U kewlse, the Camnlssion was opposed to the setond /95 PLANNING COM1i SSi 01 AFF REPORT RE: GPA88-OIA, ODA tl7-11 January 27, 1988 Page 3 alternative to 1Mighborhood Coaaaerctai. The Commission concurred that the site was a dl/fieuit ono to develop. The/r concern was toot to redesignate the site to a sore intense commercial use would only aegnify Ue already existing proDlean. AS a result, the Ca~aisston concurred, as a process of eliminatton, that Office would have the least impact and wow the aDPropriate choice. The consensus of the Casseission was to recommend to the City Council that this site retain its Off1a designation. At their meeting of November 5, 1986, the City Council reviewed the Planning Comaisslon's recoarendatlons regarding the various sites for poss/Dle redasfgnation. Thf City Connell concurred with the Plannfng Cos~tsslon analysts of the Rasa Line/IN11man siU, and they chose not to change the sites existing Office tlestgnatlon. IY. ENVIRONIffMTAL ASSESSMENT: S4ff has conduettd a Preliminary rev ro sessmen natal Study per pee reQUiraawnts of the Callfomla Errotronnental Quality Act and has detMMned that this project could result to significant adrene effects nsuiting from both soclo-economic lotion and health, sNety, and nuisance factors. As a result, staff cannot sake a finding of no significant impacts and would recaaaaend against the /ssuanee of a Negative Oectaratlon with this project. recur°", "'~; r:+onunoe7 MAL15i 5: A nunDer of design constraints res r c ~ e eve oilman po a of this site. Bast Line Road is a heavily traveled thoroughfaro. The Base Ltne/Neilman intersection 1s a moderaGly impacted lntanectton, At peak hours of use (weekday morning and craning rosA hours), treffie aavement will back up Into the existing tlrireway on Basa Line RaA. Also, the access patent/a1 off Ik1~lasan Avemle is severely itaNted. fie site's relatlvAy short frontage along Hellman (295 feet) restricts driveway locations because driveways awst malntaln a minimum distance of 200 feet from Basa Ltne on the wst side of Hellasan, Secondly, aecas tram fNllman is 1lmibd because of Hellsun's conflyuretlon Miere the stroet bottlenecks at the railroad crossing, A third factor that fa^.Strain'a deYelapoeeT p^_tentiilvf the tit! 15 Lha existence of a multi-family apartment compiex adjacent to LAe south of the project site antl the attainment of reasonsbly compatible land uses. Due to Halloo's conflguratlon, the apartment site could not access off of this street. This ieft this site with direct access only to Base Line Road. In response, an access easement was obtained by the apartment site through the project site to Base Line. fie result 1s a two-way driveway across the entire depth of the project Site that, essentially splits the property in half, ~o~ PLPNNI NG COMAI SSI01 'AFF REPDRT RE: GPABB-OIA, DDA tl7-11 January 27, 1988 Page 4 In the analysis of this proposal, staff has 1dmt1fled three spectflc Issues. They include; 11 land use Me appropriateness of the site for caa~ercial designation; raffle/atoll, traffic circulation and ingresslegross !slues rtl3ts~'".oa' s{;a ;pacific critarta• and 3) market/ana~sls, to dearmine the economic feesibilfty of Me sfl~ far a ca~erclal rather tDan otftce use. Land Use: In compaMng elternatlw futon land use options for the pro !C s1 a, an unavol daDie torsi deratlon 1a the existence of Me adjacent amltl.famlly apartment complex. Oue to unique design constraints previously hlghltghtaxl, this apartment complex must Shan access w1M the prolKt sta. The present configuration between the tro slas would nquln a subsaM/a1 OuHer from whatever 1s ultimaaly developed on the prq~aet site. In Me1r previous rwlew of Me proposal a ndeslgnaa this sta as eoe•ercial, the Planning CosaNsslon daarNned that ayltl- family nsidatlal could M an inapproprlaa use because 1t ws undalnDle a locaa higher denslRy raaldentlal units so close to Base Una Rad. fit City's goal for land use as per the fieneral Plan (Page 12) Is, "land use shall De arnaged with nspaet a laeatton, timing and density/Tntasity of developaent 1n order to M consistent w1M the ra ran/11N ~" M .A. race.., • ~ .".a2' _ __.. -~••• .• wjR ~,r~ w N~ia yWl IS to, "Organize land uses to avoid crating nuisances among ayacent land uses.' Th• Co~sisslon felt Mat a ndestgnaa the site to a land use Mat permits a grater lnanslty of use would only magnify the existing problems and could not De eonslstent w1M Me Land Use Element of Me General Plan. Thenton, Me Caw•isston did not recoammnd ndesignatl0n of Mis s1a a IMighDOrhood Cow•erc1a1. in staff's opinion, stnu Me time of Ma Caalsston's Dravlous renew a redaalgnaa Mfs site to Caa~arclai, wry 1lttie, 1f any, of Me condttlona Aave changed. The issue and nsulting analysts as dearmtned by Me PLnning Carslsslon wiM Melr prwlous review are still wild today. TrafflY C~ 1rcul~o~ _ The Aoollcant had Gr4er and Cckpany Engl.^.eers prop.. .,ir„~ scuay to addnSa Me Lnfflt 1fSYlf asfoclaLed w1M M1s sta. Staff's primary concern is Mat Cammerclal 1s a more Intense land use Man 1s Office/Professional. W1M lntenslNed land use canes increased traffic. The traf/ic study compares the traffic impacts associated with the site under four conditions: (11 Under current conditions with no existing development on the site, (2) Mith the site Dutit out with 40,000 square feet under thR Office designation, ~/ PLANNING COIMISSIO 'AfF REPORT RE: GPABB-OlA, OOA tl7-11 January 27, 1988 Page 5 (3) N/th the site built out with 31,000 square feet of Caeaaerclal/Retail Use, and (al N1th the s14e built out with 31,0000 square Peet of Caawercial/Retell Use, including a 6,000 square feet convenience store. The tratflc study looked at what would be the tratflc conditions both in 1989 under the four albrnatlves, and also the tratflc conditions in the year 2010. fie results of the traffic study aro that for 1989 Me tnfftc etrculatlon systast, Le. Base Line Road and Nslliwn Avenue mould be moderately /epacted with derelopeanlt of the site. But, the intenectlon could still be operating at a Ntter than acceptable level of wrvlee. ;n comparison of Lntfte impacts of eoimaarclal MwlopaMnt wnus Otflce development, the trafflt study concluded that awn dally trHHe rouid result fro Cd~erclal rather than Offtee use. Dut then would De no s/gMflcant difference to the operating iewl of wrvlee of the tnfftc systs resultln~~ from either the Ca~erclal or OH1ce use. L1kewlse, in 2010, the study concludes that the trafflt system will H. M. vH.. ~« "~ ~•. •-r- t-. by "~:: t::. un iv viEy Quito-out, and whether then•is an Office protect, Commercial protect, or no protect, it will have little impact as to the overall condition of the trafflt system. Again, 1n the coslpartson of traf9le impacts of Camaercial developernt versus Office developaMnt, the tnfftc study concludes that more daily tratflc would result from Co~ercla] rather than Office use, Dut then would be no signlHcant dtffenna to the operating lwei of wrvlee of the lrafflc system resulting from either the Cd~erclal or Off1u use. In analyzing the results of the tnfftc study, eerUln points must be kept 1n NM: (I1 fie Traffic Study only considered the effects of the potential site devslopcnt alternaLlvos ss thev relate cd ,agacts to tree peripheral street system, 1.e. off- slte eireulatton. (21 There are a number of on-site tra/f1c issues that must be considered with this pro eC ; (a) fie project site shares access with the ayacent apartment complex to the south. N1th Cowerctal uses as opposed to Office uses, there would be a greeter amount of on-site truck traffic for delivery purposes leading to a greater number of trot/tc conflicts with automobile users. ao2 PLANNING COMMISSIO fAFF REPORT RE: GDA68.OlA, DDA d7-11 January 27, 1968 Page 6 (b) Coamerctal use produces the greater number of trips to and from the site Men mould office use. kiM Me shared access wiM the apartment complex Me greater nvrber a0 ;rips onto Me siG would i ncroase trafflt conflicts wltn Me apartxnt users. Ic) Office reiated traffic 1s generally on week days during business noun, peak use is at aprning and evening rusMs MM 11aHted use at other ttaxts. Coa~arclal trafflt occurs during weekday business noun as rlth Offtn, but M11 also acur during Me evenings and/or reakeMa. Therefore, increased trafflt use 1s extended over a longer period of Liam and would result 1n increased impacts to Me apartsent usan and users of the center as May tnvene DeM on-s1q and off-site. i31 Flnelly, the traffic study tndlutn there wuid be no significant dfiference between OfHn and CaaMrclal uses in terse of traffic impacts. Hoverer, 1n assessing this conclusion one must understand the assumptions on vA1ch Me comparison ws Mde. In this >wvr. Lu~.rci.i use is wata on 11,000 square feet of development vhile in Me Offfee derelopment tt was assumed 40,000 square feet of development. Atsa, the traffic study vas completed under an assumed office mix of 10 percent financial, 50 percent medical/dental, and 40 percent general office. In Me genentton of t a'•ic numbers general office results 1n Me 1aasL impact, wiM flwnclal and ~medtcal/dental having slgntflcantly greagr impact 9n the tars of number of trips generated. If Me office mix wen recalculated in sgiMtul% total and Hnanclalotbeetnffic~numbmnswould be changed MaL could possibly alter Me level of slgnlficance between caaserctal and office uses of the aiu. Market Mal s/s - The aDDlltant tndlcates Mat he is requesting s c ange rw OfN ce Lo Neighborhood Caeserclal Detauae tt is M s belief that there 1s no4 sufflclent deamnd Lo absorb 30.000+ square feet of professional offla spree Mat would be provided if this site was coapleteiy Du11t out as office use. At the City's request, the applicant provided as part of Lois proposal a market research study to compare the existing market conditions between office and caewercial use. The findings of the study tndlcates that the existing supply of office ~3 fConaaunlty-scale) has approached the point of equilibrium and it is questlonaDle as to whether the need exists to absorb the additional square footage toot would be provided with this PLANNING CINMISSI OI -AFF REPORT RE: GPAB&OlA, DOA n7-11 January 27, 1988 Page 7 Bevel opaMlnt as office. fie study indicated that there is strong earket potential for certatn coaaw~rcial retail uses such as fawlly restaurants, speciality food stores, and apparel shops. A question of the earket study concerns the basic assuwptlon under which it ws coapiled that if the site were to be left with its currant office deslgMtlon it would De developed 100 percent as professional office use. fits 1s a questionable assuaptton. The office/professional zone of the Developaatnt Code perwits a nuatror of serviw/retail uses within Ue office desl9gnnaatlon, fie office des/gnation has a flex1b119ty of avallaDle land uses to pemt the Mwlopnent of a e/xed - use center, and 1s not confined to ,lust the derN opeent of professional office space. A key point to conslGr, however, 1s that the service/roU11 use pere/tted under Offlee arc of a low inUnsity type that could De eon eos+pattble with the adJacent residential uses. fie Iklghborhood Caaaaerclal deatgnatton perwtts a .nueber of Mgher intensity type of uses that would not be as coepatible with the ayuent apartalent complex. A Hnet concern of the earket study 9s that the grket study area used to assess need ws hasan ee , +_+i~ .~+. _. ~_.... _ the protect s1te. Thus the study areas ws coMlned Loathe area south of Banyan only. There is a significant population that resides north of Banyan that could potentially nuke use of the services provided on Ue s1te. A question reauins of the eurket study, that if the entire population froe north of Base Line and vast of Haven ws-Ti{~T"uded in Lhe study, would there then be sufficient dasland to warrant the provision of additional office space? VI. OEYELOPIIENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT ANALYSIS: State Law requires that e v o s r e s, .e., rag Ordinance, De consistent with the General Plan (Section 65860, Governeent Code 1. IT f/ndings can not be Bade to warrant a General Plan Aa>tndaMent of the site to a CoaMrclal land use designation, s1e11ar findings should alto sssda regarding rh. proposxd Oa:8lopsCir,t 01 strict pwenaeent of the site to Ccawerclai developaxnt dl strict to maintain this requlreeent of consistency. VII. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: !n order for the Planning Caawission to recomaen approve of tR1s project, they must find the following; 1. That this project 1s consistent with the land use policies of the General Plan. 2. fiat this project would De in the best Interest of Ue health, Safety, and welfare of the ctttze~ns^of Ranchd Cucamonga, d~ PLANNING COiWI55I0 :AFF REPORT RE: GPA88-OlA, DDA d7-11 January 27, 1988 Page 8 3. That tnls proJett mould not result 1n any significant advene fapacts to parsons and property in the vlNnity of the protect site. VIII. CORRESPOIOEMCE: Th1s tteie has been advertlsad 1n the Daily Report awpa r s a public IMarinq 1tee, a7Y property owners within 300 feet of the proleCt s1b wro sent direct ~a11 Public Hearing Notices, and the property ws posted +tth a 1 foot Dy 8 foot Urge notification sign per the City suppienanU/ noticing roqulrenents. IX. RECOMMEIOATIOM: Staff reeaawands that tM Planning CaeNssion 7S wTTdi 'tb'!If! City Council naolutions rocosfending the Oeniel of this prWeet for the masons as stated 1n the mo18t1ons. If the Cossisslan concurs, then the adoption of tM attached rosolutlons mould be appropriate. / - .. Brad Bu11er City PLnner BB:BC:~s Attaehaents: ExM bit "A" - Location/Surrounding Land Uses Exhlblt "B" - 6anerai Plan and pevelopernt Districts Exh1D1t 'C' - Dewlopunt District baidnent Map Exhibit "0' -Proposed S1te Plan Exhibit 'E' - Applicant's Stataaxsnt of Justiftcat/on Exhibit "F" - Traffic Study by Breer and Cagany Exhlblt "g' -Market Faes1b111ty Stugy by Urban Research Associates Resolution o1 Dental (6PA) Resolution of Denial tDDAI 2o.r VOIrTH CITY C~' ~`~, GPA.. B8-OIA/QDA 81-11 R.~.~iC.~E-IO CL.'C~~4O1~Gu~ Tom: LOCATIONlSURRDUNDING LAND u: QtA.ti~tvc ot~~ Exwierr: _8.._ sc~~e. ,, . SITE Dansral Plan LM ~ '_'~~ . ~.._.... .......-- ~~~ - [ _ M , ~ . - SITE ' _ ~ ... -a. 01. N =~ ~~ w ..-~ ~~~ ;, ~_ ~, /~~ M ,~ ,., ;~: ..fix ~~ ~. D~v~lopm~nt Districts FORTH CIT~Y ~OyF~ 1TE.~1: PA - IA/DDA 81- II R.~.vL[ll! CI,C~~t01~,C~ TITLE: `D ~. PMET/T DiSi.ZiC'= PL11.`v`I.~iG D(~'1S101V ao7 EXHIB[T~ B SCALE ~ C O ~ _ ~ 1 ~ ~ n e ' / o Cw '_ i e ~ .. ,J, i I T~~yfLLL_ ~® i~ ~+L . 1 . ~ ly / w I ^ ~~ I • e R ~ r~.~~r '_ $ OOPAIR N9 .~ ti9.~ ~ ~.. .~~:. ~ ~~ '. O ~ ~ ~~ri~ • ~ ` . ~OY~ ... M r . ~~ .7 rh~~ ... __ • ,x ~ 8 ~. S.~ a a. ... 63SS \\rr11,JJ..rii ~ 111 ,rr/ r \ o /\ i / 0 •J I~il+li / ~. ~ V tia~~. Mat M~~~n i..,. ~ FORTH ~~ i C[T1' ~ ~y~; GPA S8-t)IA/DiDA $T-II R'~°~~ Cj..G~~~z~1 TlllE+DEVElD~S7RICT AMEIUDMET~IT M. Pt..1.`tiIVG DI~'LSIOIV ~~ EXHigT' C ~~: .~.~,~. ~~ ~I< ~ ~if="I ~ ~, i l i l Mr r••3 to ]~~~ y1 i w~ - - i /n i V ~~ 7ANf/-~7.oV w"w .wi wrr ' ~~Aw yIY~ ~r Nf _ IY~ ~M'w~ Ywr//^^Yw, `V~\ •~1 n CIT'YpF REM;~PA 88-41A/pDA ST i~ R:~.~.~ CL'~'y TR1.E~ PQOPOSE~ SITE PLAN PL.A.'YNI.~1G DN157gV ~ E,a(HIBR' ~._ SGLE JUSTIFI GTION WITH REASONS FOA AMENDMENT Applicant requests that the General Plen Dasigna tion and the Zoning of the subj act property be changed from OlPice/Professional District (DP)„to Neighborhood/Commercial District (NC). The site is a 3.{5 acre parcel proposed to be used a• a retail/service commercial center and is intended to provide day-to-day conven- ier-ce a*.cppia~ a.:d aer.-icea for off lee peraomel and residents of the immediate neighborhood. The proposed change i• requested for the following reasons 1. with the existing OP General Plan designation and zoning, these pareel^ would support at least {0,000 square leer of prof easianal/admlaistzative ollices. Nowevar, at this time, there appears co be a large vacanry fsetor in the axistinq oflice buildings is the immediaG vieinity of thi• siG. There is ao need or demand for additional oEEiees. 2. Ths City oL Rancho Cucamonga will be moving it• facilities lrom the immediate area within eighteen months tree sing an additional supply of professional/admialsCra rive cf Eices. 3. The Ciey of Aancho Cucamonga ha• Dlaanad Che dwelopment of a substantial office/pzofessioaal district oa Haven Avenue which is drawing a largo number of the professional wee away from the subject property. Thi• will continue to draw those ---.-.-. ..anon,,: [.,i ~i.~ ~ucaaaCeale iucure. 6. There will probably always be •ome demand for certain local professionals such as femlly doctors, optometrists, den- tists, and family lawyers. Although thi• demand could not fill a x0,000 square toot professional building, it wpuld be adequately accommodated by the proposed project, The proposed project is designed to attract pzol essional and personal sarvics tenants as well as retail tenants. 5. This property Sa located in the canter of an established office/professional/residential area and would prw ids day-to-day convenience shopping and services for the oflice personnel and residents of the immediate neighborhood, o. the designation of the two parcels as Neighborhood/COm- mercial would require the two parcels eo ba developed in a consis^_ent, unified pattern. ~j~ .. G„~i, .r kF~~ '21 iou:h ~iagnol~a +.e~ee _, lnaheim Calvom:y 9SB0+ r~.,,,.• ~"1MK~xlor pl+)9a2417i ENGINEERS a PLANNERS ' ~ - ' °~ 1 t4. Tass CaLtar Saar Cartar OaYalo~m~nt ~, aaa Naat$ lritf Swat, Suit 801 Sant Aefa, Q 97701 AC: liaflie 77~a6Lt AnlyaL Sn Qy818Lt1,O<1 with tha Pi'opad NaL~baalfpoid cs~....1.t prpjst on tha Sali!'birt C1Rfla~ Ol ~••,~•,• atrld esllt•n Ae.u. in the City or Arlo ~~, rs,s~...s. (71s-old cti.r -m. area: A. auehoriznd, v. an plsasad to audit this tzsffic ~t arnlysis in cnnaetioel rite ttr oxaw..d n.ias,eow~,r,n ,.........~., pzajact on tha souetsare o®+.r of e...li:,: and Itlla~n Av.n~. iA tn. city of eirlotn ~F, Clalifomla. a» arrlysis e®inas ter i~YS of the pzoposad pro~nct on tha irfeesert,ion at bsalir» afd ttallsan kvaca><a with ttr GMigaeant of ttr pzojac! site a ni¢fhmdnod ®..R+.~ Stfatsad of ltln pzwnt pzotaoiaul otlios ~. 7}s addition to avaluatirg an ottioa dnralarent for ooepariaon AaP«r~ tw altarnatn davalops~k Plan• rats avaUat+d-vts of all ~i~fbozhood cseail uar, and a ssomd with a food suiast oe oarvaetiaena stoz~ intagratad with nsighboafyy retail usr. 'afs arrlyass also adders tlla nMaet 4t pNa-+oy tLnftle an t•,ro~I £eie orn.r,.e~.., zatr for ntatl ahapplnq o~etats. -- - •------ 12u pTOP°atl Pro~~ oonsista of a zorr dwma lzas protawianal offiaa zoning to nic~fbozllood osarzcial for ttfs davalopmarte at 70100 sq, ft. of nsic~ibozhcrad recoil ulna. A davalopmarvt altaznativa pzwiditq for 73,100 sq. te. of rrighboztaczd retail '~ attl appzoximataly 5,000 aq. tt. of oxwaniana stun usn a1T P7. JaIDae Cartaf' Jamaa CarteY Dsvelapav:L G.'s4Wfy 1Yattie Ltipct Naiysis Nei~jfbaal.~ood OO~meCial PiOjeCt Bafalitf db Ballsn AvaAa! Dar~6er 10, 1987 - Fef)a 3 w arrlysad. A peaSeeL viclltiLy ~ a.d e1La plan ate stews: 1.- Fiy:atr 1 aM 2, feapectively. Osaaa.ia: vile a,. aty ahtt rwlted v, ttr Oataafmia: to a*:dtat p.a. peak ear nLYw foe L1a Si:taarectiv: oL Baseline and 1i13a0 AVetue aid to eto~tr peoyec* amrs opaatloir. Gl~ i m. staff oYaavd traHfe opaetla:r aid oorducted p.a. peek ear turiiii:g rovearnt mares Leo• a:oo m ssao p.s. on lasdaY, Osoatf7ec b, 198'f. 9r edatLq ttaftiq rovrit vOlusr tae D•L peak hoar afr aeon an Figta~ 7. Ro7~ctad atileauL traniO whoa rsLr otRained ties sea City zYattle $+vinaar and used tae an analyals of e>~reatl tOAxra oaediticrr. Barad an «1+tini k:Lafseutim geaetrios and aiq:rl apastiar, cee SnLafseeeSm ~ih' analysis vrr aaM:cLW wir9 eta u:tefaaceim csp.city veilizatian (2011) ~'> ~etnmlaiy. 1sel. 1 tu'asarrts the wlier-to-oprelLY N/C) L+tiar aid 1*rais of safviw (IOB) tae Les sdtly intefracGia: :sfdat czrf~:e c~+diticir. tmdar edstifq ootdiilan, ttr ii:tstre~tim of easeliir aM Hallman Jlvrine aptntiiq at a him level of aetviar viN LOB "C" and a V/C ratio o! 0.706 duriig tea p.m. peak tear. (1) "IDployirg InGL7actlon CapaclLy CK111ratial V0lta6ar Lo EatimaU Overall Leval of SrLVica", TYUttic L7fginrciiq Megazina, July, 1974. ~~~ I FiGUaE ,.~ .............. ai~~ i?fi ~t~; ~~3~ .I Ii ~.~ 1 00r it F ~ ~ i 71 ,l~ ~~_~ ~ i ` Y ~ ~ i ii ~ ~ a I ~..._~~` _.,a . aX.~....- T~~ JTF ~ a ~ g `U' `.i i ~~ --uu iIG^/uAE ~~ r~ no-m n. ~~...a. ~~ ~m ~o N ~~ N h 1 ~ti ~~ `~h f -F6, ~,,_9..Z. f~.Z '' i ao~ .ri 996// ~ /s~/~i/a'[°~3&" 1/3//3 ~3 `/3S ~'' ~~ 7~19~/75~s/~ ~-- 673 f ~0~!'13~~~~ 66/~~f3/7~i-" ~ , -~ \ I ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~H N owp ~ Li_ CENn ofin 1 aEC ~ i ao o Dom" P,tF ~o!/- ~cT ~~ ~sr• ~ ~orz EXi~Nfi /~~7 ~Q,~ ~ 3-TO ~?O/O O/O I FIGURc ,.~_..,......., _ ass-~,. t4. Jaer CatGaT Jama• Cai4t pMlctar+t ~7 2taftic Dspsct Iwlysi~ ~hL~bodtaoa O~usCLl Pccf~ct 8saalirr an! N~1J~~ Avarua Jaruaey !~ ]9at - Plq~ 6 171P1]• 1 1271l18DLR7:ON CAp/1Q7 AS1~PIb7lXT Y J1lO~yygLR- pQ,gTIIi,. PIR-P~7LC.P AND SDL~.7.im - BarAlit>. and Hallan Avaeaa D.K. As k s.,. ~i+q 0.708 C 0.67] A 1989 ~ Psvjad 0.721 C 0.690 B 2010 v/OP Rojd 0.89] D 0.892 D :.liacxtiuv~ a (t1Y zQ~OtZld): 1989 v/Op Pmjact 0.777 C 0.779 C 7010 v/OP PtCj~CC 0.897 D 0.852 D A1tBtstitiv~ 2 (lYi~lb0a i0o6 ~ ) ibt-PtOjd (1989) 0.76{ C 0.770 C POat-PtvJd (2010) 0.888 D 0.88 p ALtacflBLiV\ 7 (Na1Qlbodfars~Iamu~niarra Oa>~p ial) P~at-Pmjact !1989) 0.780 C O.7i6 c Post-Ptgjast (2010) 0.899 D 0.859 p (1) ~/C - wlum~to-~aircity ratio ~ [D8 - l.u.t ~e .....io Saucy: anBt i Co. , Fhgitraif and Planrrn. ~/P t4. J~aa Getter Jaen Carter OavaloptarR ~7 1laffic lit aresiysis Hai~fboxR~od CoidYeial Rojo asaalilu and aaliaan Avanr Jan,asy a, 19aa - AT ~ RerpxvjaCt !rattle wlesaa ++aa datavitud by appLyinq an aranal gew~th factor to err aodsttn2 txatLia wUaea to aoma+e for noe>•lly al~s7ad tratflc 1te3aerr taauttLg i1v geeeasai ra91on1 drvalcpseret. 'ma aenal 9~ rap w dataplnad by ao~inftq Uw dittrte~aaa baerwtan andatieq exalflc wlraa r meaetad by the oea+aetitrrt atd the R'a7ap+d Dnk here wlura !ce 2010 and sef1^•-+•~• !d aenrl ittQeara fm m 22 year ptetad bKaaen 197 aad 2010. 'dr gawta rotas vaa~ calaulatad oh the baois o! dlteaKiarl trattlc on Seaalina aloes !!aa prvjat:bd 4eeraN L diil~aant for Ula aaatboeaed and wtberaid dlzerticte. 9fa a~aexad at;la~on data tae Nia pev~aet will ba in 19a9e 'afaraton, the araaael gewlh rata rata a~piiad to tlr tratile wltsar for a tW year paxiod is Uea 19W tatgat year to obtain ttr 19a9 pzrlavJaR teafilc wluaer, wSoh ae•aaa .., ~.•;~•.• !'_t . ~:. ;,:.i•cz siv. rtrpco~ct traffic wlumes vote~alao caLnA,atttl aari analysed for ttr year 2010, Sa. prvjacttl 6ullder+t traffic wl~ fricitdirq the ptojaez alto betilt~ut tsdar the OP reahitq. 'Aa lttr-(a:ojact traffic wlpaa for hoRh 19a9 red 2010 an ahOaT in sigea» 7 for the P-a. peak hers. 'Aa intataaetlae capacity analyara wart ~~'^'a paltq the IC7 aeealyaia aaethOdolaeAr utd 19K aetl 2010 pcs-paojaet ts7Kio vclma. 'Apia 1 YfeH~ t!» VJC ratio and LOB tte the pc~-pa'ojac{ oofditims in both 19M and 2010. Utdar 19M pn-iuejaet c~nnditivr, Rho sddy Letatsactlan will mTGitua to operate K a hiQ1 lawl of aeaviaa at LCE "C" with a vic tar±c ct 0.7<a wtireina tt+. p._. ~~ ~. Vrdar ptojaC'tad buildset eadlti0er 1h 2010, the abldy Urtaraact.ion with axi.atire2 lane 9aematry vial Qatarica'ata to LOB ^Lr' red a V/C ratio of O.B9] during the p.a. peak hose. 1176 "tY' in an aeaptabU level of aarvia for utsan mdltiaes, alRhaa~f the itttataactian aparatiana will b. approaching urdaairabU CQaratiOnal cz+rfdttiQ1/. ~(~ ter. rasa cbrtar ramr aanar Daualolart+t cospsny 7Yattim il~Pr-~t urlYais traiq~omocd n~....t.~ Psojact eaaall+r am Hallam aivan~a .rarv.sY e, l9aa - jb9a a 7YiD 9assatlas saga haaad an da4 asshld by U» Lrtitarts of 4YarrparTaGian Rglrras (S~ van ...~ i ~ ~..+ to aatimata rimaa tripe mat wt]d b graaatsd by bolh an offiaa psajact urd¢ ma pc~R OP mtln) (Altaatrttw 1) and fee tso altaartivaa tOC m. peeyoaad pse¢et undue mr psapmad natphadnod seta!! aarcieq. Altaontiw 3 peupo.aa ]0,100 aq. !e. of nat~batnod sw11 uas. Altaemaliw ] LeOaporataa ~ tm 5,000 aq. !C. of !lend atota ar Oota~anlada stores uM and ]5,100 aq. ft. o! sui.~fbadnad satJ111. Ih sd! OaM. mr affect of Dw'DP trips w appllsd to ma t:lp ganaearla~ wl~srs Lac ttv. triglbaesood satail apOs aM !n ma wma o! tlfa ottio peojaet, it w also applied m t?ra t~^~'~-~ uw. Aaa-bY trier nsa Lhos trip that rind 6a uairg ma adJaaant senores Mrt2>ae or rot ma pev~ace ass dsvalapad. pas'bY tzip attt appOS~Ga~iattc trip lsrtaad of dstiMian trifas, L. aeivv.+ a..;.i -~--~w of tk oppee't+atity to !aq aR Un rri¢fboshmod saeail rtOeas baeauaa may van drlvLg Pet ttr pecJaet anyway. PIL trip sates and pooJaetad trip toe all mtar altsmatiw asa ~ >n 'itibla 2, Aa shown in 11E1a ], fife affla. ptojad (]lltsenatlwa 1) weld ganfata appeadsealy 1,9H daily trip, aed appevdsealy 710 trip d~ ms p.a. prk has. 3i onlparison, ma seta!! altasntivar viii gerra4 ui~lY ~Y Mp ~~ Altasnatlva 2 aoolifsCltl t0 grnarata about 2,x79 tripe std Altazrrtiva 7 above 7,177 tiles. Hmwaag, Ser the p.m. pmk ~~", :.lt+;a~r~iiva i will 9'~s'ats apPemdatalY ]10 trip, uftlla Altatnetiva 2 mould ha sli¢itly leis and Altassstiw 2 s1ls~tlY mvsa at 27S and 7av tripe, sarp«.tiwly. All mss. aleaenativaa will gananh p. m. psk hoot traffic wluas vlthiA a rstya of only 7S trip dilfasanca. air ~ tOr. Jars aettr Jatrr Otte[ OavalcpmtnC qty 1Yelfic mist 1Vrlytit Naiq~Eaalnod Orn~t¢elal Rojaet Buallrr and lltl]tan Averut Jaru~ry t, 19it - Ptgt 9 331 2 Roiwt Irlp c~+.teeim na. _~iSa_ .~L1Y._ _~1. _~ AlerntelV. 1 - ap zmliryotflat - 4a,aoo a ~ral~al on. Io,aoo d Aattt pe 1,000 d sa.6 3.47 5.17 ~P 1,Ori 69 107 Htrncial 4,000 d llttet ptc 1,000 d 193.0 14.0 33.1 1Yipt 76~ 96 QO I4rP 614 4s 40 Rot. Ottlat 16, d00 d IZalr ptr 1,000 d 19.7 0.40 1.41 iSlp _2t7 s ~° 'tOGL 1, 9t9 120 190 ALtamtCiw 1 - Hai~hotff0od Rttall -- 70,100 d rotas pee 1,000 d 117.9 s.77 s.61 'R'1P 3,3{9 174 17s Pets-by IOf - 710 =~} _3i l~TT 2,t79 139 140 Ale.m.elw 7 - wl¢6welnoq/ctinvaninot Attail - 30, loo t! xair~badiood 35, loo d wea pes l,ooo tf u7.9 s.n s.el TYlpf 2,959 183 146 -di~-by ZOi _J~ ~ ~S t~R' 2, 367 116 117 CZxNfll4flOt 5,000 of Patat per 1,000 tf 322.6 23.3 13.7 1Yipt 1,61] 117 117 Pats-by SOt _ 807 ~s ~p F1E?' B06 ~ -~ TEL 3,177 174 17s t4. amass caflar Saar rarear Davalaprarrt ~ 'rrarrie ripa~t anlyais rri~,eazbaad ~-Ts caoiace eaaalLn ana frl7ran A~nnn sanuary e, Ines - gaga to Fbt-pev~acG tsa!!Se omdttio'r aasr Uiat ait2~r uiatrtivr ] ~ Altaartiw ] afa QavalapW Sn 1Lu of an afllo peaSatt tar 29e9 aiid 2020. $fa Ica analyas rm apptiad to 19a9 poatrpevjasY ~asiitiorr. 'IDa pst-pco~act 1~affie wl~aae far tha p.a. peak has an ahwn in Tlgca~ ]. 'Aa IG9 valor and v/c zalSaa velar 29a9 P~~7aCt avditiwr ara atm Ln 1fE1a 1. IAalar 2969 paR-pevjac* aarditiar, tha aedy Sikaa7aCtlan at Baaalizu and llallarf lrapfa will aaitltar apasatinq at psi-pE[Oj11C! INYlar Sa. t! IOB "C~r f(! hOtII AIIaCJIaLlw 1 afd 7. laa' Altar+rtiva 7. Ir411 rlapr tha Y.tl Mill ha "C° rith a v/C niio of 0.7N, and fot Altarnaliva ], tha IfS will t» "C"' with a V/C rrtio of 0.7a0. 'Iftla a~ W IL10 "C' and a V/C ratan of o. rr~ ti,. ~~~~•_:_ „ :.y ..: i.ia. u~c>• pev7atc altafrrtivaa will incxaasa itftasaetia~ voluar ^~~^~"y and will rot r,ru1! in a aignitiaa~! ~! an itttaaaetian opaatiarr. Tna '^~~~"!~ v112 aparat~ velar aoaaptabla oarditima Sn all ttlnsa oar. w,r tdou! oaedltions in 2010 ran also aoalnad with Altaxnaliw 2 and 7 OOIR[1iCllad in liar of !d oftip pevyact v~0at tha Cp zonitg. ~ 7010 pest-Iaojact voluss ara also stq~m in lig~ 7 with Ma anSyais raWta aharh in 11b1a 1. Nith tila pmjai.'tad tsaftlc vOluar far tha buildaut torditiafl at tifa antis CLLy, aatiaead to aocur appr®dsataly Sn 7010, tCr sGdy !a!*ar•~tiah kril.i :arsrlwrwa. to }rra unr, "- -'r ~'y~ ail thrw altarNtlw rill egaiata at ICs "D" with V/C zatlaa of 0.897, o.sae and 0.899 tar Altafnatiw 1, 7, and 7, taapaetivaly. All thraa p[ojaeta raault in ttr aama falativa ttaffic effaces, and rw of the thfaa altamaeiw rill have a sicytificant Sa4ect an traffic oparalioro. with ttta addition of an aaatbwrd rift turn San an t2r eaarbourd Baaalitr apptoacll, the intarsa~~ian cwld b• slic¢tely Ptc. Jaar Cbttter Ratfic fact Arriysis Neighbomood coafreial PeojeeG Rfaalirr and nell>rn Avocet Jarfuary a, lees - pegs bx mewed ie tll oar. 'IIr seaults of thL paribla ia~uv~rsrt an also shown in 11h1a 1. '~ Pet9oeed f~~= Averfue amsr L altiwl m !hs euaceae oL th ~U9 ~ r W3 r m lapepM aoeeealblllty m tdfa rr~.y,.~~f feliU m LS7s 1:Yr at tife pev}eR. 'IDs i~si,dtloaa peerftly !aloe their aoaar fLt>! Eaaallrr accar ttr ptvJect RoPgtiY• Esolw of 4attiC Q~rfl ~ at the f..~~.~...f..f an eastbofad ssalirr diairq the p.a. paale brae, it it sastiar ditLioult m srla a fafnebaa~! left hen fete eralirr irfm Ltr Pc...d driveway aaoar. frith eh. Hallett aonaaa, eeridenb could ~ their late hen lees lssalin Dram saftithoufd lhllsn and titfl a ziQR half 1nm the Peojeet, ~ebY awidirq {~ ,... _ "- :.r.:..:..C .~ eoaiirr ac tsfa eKiattrq driveray location. similarly, srktre~ a loft hen efdt aftc Brauer fees tlfe pevjeCC and Ltr eciseirg rridffror could bs srda eries- by ~~ th• Pecpossd ltallmfvf drivawry and ttanirq late at ttr Ltvesecelon. rla PuePoar of this artalyaia, th... mvrrtts fwr. aaasrsd to n. px.eoaifrne a:trinq the peak tfofs due m elr wits of traffic an Baaallrr and t!r quafr at tlr inteesaction. 0lsitiq nor~paak ltafa>w, boN t!r late hatfa in and the left hfhr ONt CCfild ba /tla vith :~lat.lve era and rfety. Fiallaaan Avina L paogra®ad t0 a viderrd and a nev storm drain irrtalled aoueh of the pxyjact boundary ~~ !hm !tat tWo va,a:s. ~_.:..~... _ peovide tar a late' !tart larr •eq of llailan Avenw aitould rerthbaad at >lsaalltr with a o~tirsrcua two-way left turn larr soutlrrly to a dLtancfa of 135 to 150 feint south o! ttr project south petpatty lino oroe the widsnirfq is coopleted. thftil t!r aapletion of t!r widrlirq sM dxairtaga Project in Fisllmsn, a left !sett Tarr should be pewided rorchbotud at Basalirr, and oppoming left ruin lards peovided at the ProjeR's FielLtWt Averer driveway and ttr drivewy m the east aide of Hallman. ITr Project's dtivawmy should b located On Cho Saar centarl Srte al icgmivrc 41th the eXLat171q dr1VlVay Or1 ur .eat sic. oC Hallmyf. ~a/Eiv~ Ht. Jasar caner Jana CaitK ONa1Qau+t ~Par+Y 1Saltic 1~7nt Antlyafa Hais~boahmd Cmtcial Pco7~ct Bsealirr and llallaan Avanue Janney a, 19ts - wqa 12 e,.,an,...., ~.s.~ prif¢ aociat:nq oardltiar and un0ar ilN9 aofdltia~ vim any o! ttr mn. paojc! altarnatiw, the saralinti~-~~-~^ Avian lntewaetlm v111 b opQaelrq arias 'rP, w aow~tabla Leal 01 SaNlca, durLay m• p.s. yeak has. 'tfla paopoaal pcoryact utamaeiw Y and 1 will iaault in a119ht1Y lwnt and a1L~tly hi9tarc v/c iatica, saapeetiv~ly, than tLr otiiw pmyaR vadax utaatrtiw 1. uy of maw vs~e altsmatiw viill saRaara: • nairrl iria~aae 1n axirtLq tsttitie voivw uid nma still iawut !n any aigniti~t fapacts on ma eeafy 7ntaeaaeelor~. tJrdQ ultlaat~ luildaR ootfdltiau fac ma antii~ Clty ~1....w to acct¢ in apptadaaY~ly 2010, ma 1nEaaeetian will )» oPatatlr4 at tY oorditiatr at las "0". w >n Ufa caw oP m. 1919 omlitlCnar all mice altwnatiw vault 1n similar txftlic oadlticrw. 'Cr {••t••~••+~••• vlll e.r.~..... _.. aooaptahla level of aaavica rim no aignlilone tiatiic iapacie raaultirq iias any of ttr mir altmtrtiw. an poundal iapawarm to aid ineataaeelon apaatia+a vould b to t7atripa ttfa axiatiiq aaatbaafd ~oad1 to the irrtarsertion to pacivida far; the daalgntia~ of a e¢nta ric/~t turn lan. 'the rtgft turn lava ~ b aall,avae aSep1Y h' seriplrq ms aadattrq psv~rn! vimout x~ooniigtsirg !tr piwtt stripirq ae ridardrq m• tws+ay. 'afa pa~arnt coeduay vidth !s srardaid ddth and piwidea aPad for ttr ri¢~t ttaT lane. The Hallln Avarua amts 6s~t ills pioja~t :a ctitirgl ea r3r ~uocw of local aaoaaa faa' ttr ahoppirq a~+tar std the aa:+ass for local x~sidanti lovttl hehird ma ptojazt seta. It all0ua for Wier and aatar amts to both ahoppaea W tvaidants. 'ills Hallman Avanw soots should ha lavtad dli~ctly appoai4 t1N axistirq drivaMy of t!Y soot aide of Hallmsn. Hallman should ~a~- -r. ,7e hitrr Jar ~ wwlapr~t 4ap.ry sc.tric Duet ~1Y~ tAigB6aetnm eza.setal Roi~et awiiir am xuirn sv.ar Janu.sy s, isa - wq. v b~ NsSPd Dae a 1~lt Can lrr nEeCLen~+d ~t aeaLL+e m+d ap~as8q ldt Can l~rrr d titi H~llan deivsiay to Cr P~~ W ~ ed~ltr9 drivey m !~ gut ~.W~. -ti M Pt~d m ~N bra ad aA7iRa110~ Cf Yev ~n6 t!r City of AYIChO ~~ m tsla ¢oJ~et. DT 45aa an +Q' qu~tlar a O~Itir p1M/~ dD noC O~altab m c+oOtaR Y/. Y ~~itttl, ~~~~~( - Lsry i. Q+rr, P.i. R~Du L6:st ~~3~ I ~Nrastc;ION :.vavr unuanw ua) weet a cp., uy~oE.ft w •iam.n ; ro•c•1 I [I [t N t(YI(t10 [y[M111Nr [III rOMI• OKMONf $t• IOtJ ONaIiM tttl NNI I•VN NrN/NN I ................................ E.M. IEAC NOYI ...................... t2f 7rIM0 GtOgrNitt ................. ........... ..... .. I I 1901 ... I 2010 .... .. I E2ltifq V/C I Y/W MOJtR V/C u/ Ot ZpN v/C I plgRlq tYtl WNCiTY I VOLIttt M710 I vOLl/ttt 4r10 I WLIMt Ui10 NNft/OPEr 111N 1 1700 t>M I O.t» I In I 0.201 I 274 i O. L7 I I tlMe - iq I 170 I ~ - I j lNt 1 1100 Zr O.W I >n O.la/ I Jq O.t% I I a.nnOwnt rnrv 1 trm 177 ana I ut oaq j xq oncp j I uwt a - I n I 70 I I lHt t 1100 I 1/ B.Oq I I m 0.017 I L I O.OU I I t..etwr nitu 2 7apo Iw o 7n I 1{7 p.m I n7e I o.7ea I I OMt - 117 I 11! I 170 I I LNt 1 12q _ 4 0.000 I N O.mO I 30 0.0]7 I j vrNNOtI my 2 leq {77 o.ite j 7t0 o.m j /xq p.7n j I ue7t - q . j LNt I t{p0 Y O.Oat ~ 70 0.04 I 1N 0.07a ~ }NW O./p0 i VN Iq 0.100 i ullw 0.100 I I '• yK • 0.70{ I V/0 • O.Tet I V/C • 0.017 I I to c l sq c l la o f I I i"nNwcntw crnctn urnlmla ^al Oq{e { 0., eq/qMt tr01 E101.W9 <21POt) I I City N OMNO QMgK~• Glllwnlt p«OMt 71, tt+e1' I I tiii11ro "'• •'""' "` I I ................................. _ • -••• •-- ^ ....~.... - -r ......... niV ttirl4}7q tM00YB10MT0 ............... I I t1e1 ..................... I m10 ........I I I t7f ttlN Y/i 1 1400 .roatR V/C I Y/ OE IOIM V/C I I Olq[ri011 uql I WO[IA VOIINt Y}IO j Yalwt uno i wlw uno I I N«eMMd rnrv 1 11q ' tw o.+N I In o.307 I 27a o.xN j I e1Mt Iw I In I zao - I I sNt I / 1{q m o.la I I a0 o.ur I 700 p.l% I I suseetltr rltn 1 170D ne pn4 ; tN I pna I xa onw j I NtOt a I a I 70 I eNt 7 te00 H O.pII i m 0.017 i 20 0.016 I ONtOw01e rnEY ' I 3t00 IOe O.at I 101 0.x01 I ttfa O,y,O ! ' OiMt i uoe ++! ...71 I iii 0.072 I IA 0.000 I LNt I 1 1000 4 0.0x1 I I N 0.0x1 I K 0.07) I I YKtew+t rnEU : xpo N7 o.ilo I 71• I p.xt7 I tM6 I o.ln I I Nlnt a I a I n I I un 1 It00 w p.ut I 7o p.o4 I ne a.pra I I I r.ua. o.1ap j I ..uw o.tpa j auor a.:o I vl[ 0.677 I v/C • I 0.{00 I V/C • ;,!!2 ; I los t l .n 1 1 :[s ..~ 2asa - I (Mflt7lCifd WeCI LT WI42ATtd f1G1 GElit E CC.. [Mi Mert t1tC •llnsn f2'7•JI) ~ Clry •1 llsll0 CuCE•Mp. C•Iibrni{ a4 EEN1T;Vf I 0•C•i•r 31, :90 1 i, I lwl1A tNl Mlles eVrNr ........ .. N. O[K NOW !Y(STtMO fiOM ............... ................... ttIU ....................... ....... I .....e ................... I i f9eE I 2010 I I [YIET IN6 V/[ W? •eOJftt Y/C I V/d NeOJItt V/C I I OltlRld was O//eOI1T veEUtll MRO I VOLUtl7 MTtO I vOLUt1{ I Mrfe I I I NgtNMnr i11N f 1100 tN I 0.19r I 222 0,20! I 2K 0.7e7 I I u1Nt to I of I 200 - I I L•Ye f 1000 220 O.fa7 I 7V O.tY I >a O. q7 I I I Sw<O.w.t1 TON 1 1700 17S O.tOa I 5N 0.117 I 30e O. taO I I Rlwt - >Z I >f I ~ I I LNt t 1100 11 O.OR I m 0.017 I 20 0.011 I j l..dn.r nrv : 7000 w e.7tr j tow O.Sw j tt7s o.7ee j I nrle tt7 I ttf I t>t I I L•f< t tew u o.E2e I a7 o.ow I K o.ms I j v.a..r rtr31 2 71w en ! o.ao I m I e.tw I ua I o.7rr I I •tMt a - I w 1 n I i Ll/t t tew Y o.at I a e.lna I tte e.t171 I j nu. a.tw j Mu« o.tw j »u.r e.+w j I I vYO'• I o.7a I r/c . I a.rn I v/e . 1 o.eq I I I Lw C I l0e . C I tw 0 I I I terwamd wee7r+ uru7Mnd E+w7 atwE 1 mo. 4wttttNtn w rteTtteM Ettvot3 t I eler d tar.• rr~~-__• _.,... _-.. t7.~ ~ ~ 0wawr 7r. tUf I I I lr•tIM .tl N.IIrn evwNw I r.e. ItlAl . me ItlrtMrtd ttetwNvture tetld . ...... ...... .. .. ... ... .. . ...... I . ..... ................................ I ....... ... .. . . .. . I twv ... . .. . I mte .I .. I I atlrlw v/e I vier IAWIR v/e 111/d rwutt vre I I Ocntttd Lwe weary wLtwl Mna I vaawe Mno I texuye alto I I I wretttt.tr rn•v 7 t7w ew I o.ew I 222 I o.u7 I xfa I a.aa I I e1Me taf I tq I tw I I Leve t t1w 22e eno I 217 ones I 7w o.tn I I I I I I Eeuarw n.v t t7lo u7 o.tY I tY o.tts I iw o.tw I I etrtt u I n I w I I Ldt t t1w » o.m2 I m o.et7 I a o.ou I I I ; i buun!_t r. ~. 7•ee w O.tee I tow 0.70{ j 1171 O.7w I j ueNT t Cleo tt7 o.en I ts7 o.en I t>, o.or I I L•re t two N o.oty I a7 o.ow I s1 o.o7s I I I I I I NIEEttgEtl iNru i 7000 077 0.210 I 737 o. u0 I 1x01 0.777 I eleNE a: I u I n I I urt t two Y o.wt I t7 o,ou I to t.Otc I I I cello. 0,700 I nlla o. too I pll0• O.IDO aaS LCE l I :07 ~ , .J: • ~_ I Ilnlncna warn urnluna[ uaI ulel i a., fmhu•t .b rl.ww. <ztv-un ; I Gity N RereO• Cieaenft, Glif•mix NlilRYtlK 2 OR~Cxr 71, 1 9e7 I 10•Nllne .110 INllrn SvMb• I ................................ N.N. Nf5[ ........... N0111 lXIITIIO OIOMTtICf .................... ...... . I . 10M .......... ........ ( 2010 I nltsnw v/c I Nwr•nI¢vler vrc I rmr•wz/er vrc I I OII/CT 101 w[i Wa1tt I 40LUlri Ui10 I t11L11111 Mp0 I vOLUrI MTfO I t•rrlWS.tl rxN 1 17W 1h I tl.rw I z11 I o.rn I 24 I o.n{ I I u{nt - +a I w I ,n - I I LNe 1 15f7 I 220 „•,:: I 270 I 0.111 I 700 0.100 I LxrtllOwrM iArv 1 t7pp 175 0.105 I 171 tl.t15 I 210 0.1{1 I OI7Ot 27 I 21 - I 70 - I LNt 1 1{00 H 0.012 I 20 0.077 ( u 0.01{ I I I /wtW~1 I I I wOtlrw TON 2 750p [I~It - LNt 1 1Y0 into 2 75a NMt - lcit 1 11r 1Y 0.71] ( 10a 0.277 ( 11M 0.705 113 ( 117 - I 170 Y 0.020 I e7 O.OD I M 0.077 {n o.211 j 751 e.at j 1711 Lm j el I of I n I Y 1.a1 i r 1.r7 i 122 O.a7{ I I TIIIM O.ir (TNltu 0.1r I rillwr 0.100 ( I I I v/s • o.7r ( r7e . o.7Y ( vrc • o.1r I La e I :ol e ( La tl ( I INUnerla wam urnlrlrral cleu2 I Gm 702.. UriNr•. _.. ,.~_:_ y„ I I tiq d •.w. ~_,~-,~ .~:Nmu aTllMTlr1 2 OK•>ref 71, iW7 I I imlln• aw x011•Yn evwNw I ................................ N.1. IM[ N000 ..................... YI77 ItITIGT1011 IOrMpllTi ................ . I I 1700 . ................... ( 1010 ........I V R1iTIM Y/C I IOIT•i10JOCT YK I OrT•OIO/IR Y/C I 1011/RIDtI LW! I WSCiT 10.LM1 tlrr0 I nLU11i 4110 I va1111/ MTIO I •extlM~n1 TON 1 1100 1M I 0.100 I 211 I O,a7 I Iae I 0,250 I I nM, ui - I 1r ; 1n I I LNt 1 tY0 !10 O.tq i 270 0. ter ( 700 O,ir I S.vurfr TIIN 1 1r00 177 tl.1u I 1n I ono I 110 I o.+cr l I 11111 - n I a I So l I LNe I I 1000 f0 O.OtI I 20 0.013 I K O.OU I ~ f r~17 ri1N ' ) 4M "' 1 O.mL I tOD ! 0,701 ( 11Y O.Sq I I 11eOt 1 7000 117 0.071 I 117 0.072 I 171 0.00{ Uxt I 1 1600 N 0.020 I I N 0.017 ( S{ O.OSS j WttOa[d TON 2 M00 NS 0.210 I 760 ( 0.2.11 I 1210 i 0,717 I Ii{Oe - Si I 57 I 77 LNt 1 1000 Y 0.051 I I 07 0.057 I 122 0,:75 I 'el la. 0.1001 I rp leV I 0.100 I rtllw J.':] I uc • o.e]7I v/e . I a.r3o I v/c : :.s.e la y, "' ~L,' I LOt t I :^.i v'_i Si:': Cn }i4:" ... p'I ]w ..•. .•iii . ..,. ey:-er•: aro a ir...: - . ;~, ai ianTa C.canert+r :alvfa* n,a +l'?aY+" I! 7 ;rcwnOrr J', ' :dT ! i,at:q are U,LfYn AvwVr I ............................ ..... +, v, >Gt ......... qM [:KSTf •0 a3rM•,ii7 .............................. , I ! '0!f j 2010 I lXf If;MG V/G ,(Iti-+tOaLT V(C I W!i •r•0:lCi '!(C I I Of11Cr101 I uWS Gr,Cltt MIUIlf r1{!0 I vOUPlt MiiO I MLVNS tITlO I I rw9wana ihrv 1 1700 ib 0.'90 i x19 I 0. tix I 3a1 I 0.311 I i ntnt - lav - I 197 I IW 1 I I ors 1 1100 ?r o, ra I 21r o, rat I 70f o. rvl 1 I ta,tnaw.r rnw i 1700 1!7 I o.la I In i o.11e i 3u I O. fat 1 1 nlns a ! n I m I 1 L.+t + ;tOG n o.au I m La17 I a o.au 1 j lrm..r rnr.. : also w I o.alr I too I a.x1 I Itrt I o.7r1 i i nlnt ns I n7 1 1>t 1 I - I ldt f ifOr 4 O.OT I I 17 0.000 i I x 0.07! I I I VtatOa,at rnN I 7100 1D 0.x10 1 7.7 O.DI 1 1317 0.710 I B/1t 1! • lNt 1 1100 ff 0.041 Hllr vrc L?t• 0.101 I fNlwr I 0.700 i vR e 1 La W 1 71 1 K 0.010 I f70 0.0M I I O.tN I TNl•• 0.400 I 67M I VR • O.OM e I for o I Imraeno w4e:n orul3rna tlai aw s m•, Ollrhitrr ar na.w.::»•on I 1 Ciry d 11nNM OaitarnOr, Gl Nami• Mr60M7IM 7 Oaa•0•r 71, IN7 1 i IWlfn1 A r•114ai ,Iran ..................•....... ..... I.M. Kw i10A ........•............. V/111 MI11G7tp IIOOOYltIMf! ....... •...... ......... ..... j .. I I I 1100 .... . . I mt0 ... .I I I mmM1 v(t I Io11•rwrn vrc I ro1T•naln we I I orrlenoi Lug1 worn v0.um una I roLV»a arto I apuyl aorta I I { +.rtnr.w rnr,A 1 17eo to I o.1w I _ x» I n.tax I x71 I o.xsc I I H/It 1H 1 I7! I iN I I bIt t i 1f00 7x9 0. tf] I I Ui n.taa i 701 I 0,191 I I faueMwr Ilw 1 1700 1!! 0.10. I 177 0.11! I x17 I 0. ti.i I I r/r°f r: 1 n I 7a 1 I lNt 1 I 1100 if 0.013 I x0 0,017 I U O.Ota i i a.e1r+•y TMI : a1/o w I o.IM l io4 i 0,70/ 1 Im I o.74a I 1 none + 1100 Ila 0.071 1 nl a.o>2 1 rx1 e.=s , I L•ft 1 I iN0 4 0.030 1 I <> O.Oai I 71 0.03! I vrfcm_n•_+ ;~ru i x00 17a 0.x10 1 747 I 0.37! 1 1317 1 O, JIO I 1 IiY1t - - 43 I 47 I }! I I ua + I +1oa w o.al I u o.oar I fa n,o1o i ! ! r•l lav 1 0.100 I I r•llw 1 n.100 I Tallar i I O. NCO i v/c . x.173 1 vrc . o.n1 I v(c • o.e7o I f w7 1 1 Lo/ c l ws ~ I ~a ~ a~ . COMMERCIAL CENTER MARKET ANALYSIS ~ 817E BASELINE AND HELLMAN SITE FORNSA RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA :" ~ wnpa d:.nuwN 11988 URBAN RESEAFiC ~ASSOC~ATES I~~ ~sOCIATEB f W Girton, Cp ~ !8$3' ~ a8" 1' ~~ 7I Onl CONTENTS Introd..cticn 1 ,}ffi Ca M;.•L'1t (.OAOitlOn4 . 3. E~:istinq Jffica Cdncitlons r. ruturf Market Condatlons B. 7nf Rfgtonal !office Market 10. Retu l $l ctor POtfnelalf • 11. Bafe Trade Ar9a and Populatlon 1.. Retail Dewludment Patterns 16. Alta Loma Pr o~oct^ in Pipeline 21. Ratan Demand Mpdflinq 23. Area Forecaf is .b. Referfnces . .9. asa .tars. ofticf builu'- viaf inf evolving Bince commercial :e of population qro {t succeff. particul and art targf tfd to {. hoWRVer. One fact :ablisMd retail. se le range Of ov•s op specific sites, them R1Vit1-f actor 3nVef Of • mar k'If •^a~n :. area of wa tern Ran et acrlf ai the sOUT Hellman interfeCe1On ~d OR (Ott ice/Protest ~lanal and administra •sses. A general plar borhootl Commercial the property owners. ~r oan Research Asfocia ~p ter II e::amines the offs[! market condir:ona wiinsn the Alta Lama area, tnen compares Mas• with me ottscs 9nviranment ciiywioe. Thai section as followed by an assessmmi of th• retail sector ppppYi4nitlaS dnb Cpnitraint4 pertinent t0 ih• SILT. me retail analysis inciueee e. c•: er•.~w of tn• population Support for retail and servspe businesses: an inventory at a:,iatsnq competstsv shopping centers; and notes on commer- cial projects wnipn ar• in varipua stages of planning antl develapmen t. ~3~ ILDFFICE (MARKET CONDIT10N9 Th• offi a market sn the City pf Rancho Cucamonq• ser vea batn regi anal and cpmmunity scale self viti.+, ?n recant years, a major regi anal offic complex ineludinq • number of larq• multi-stpry offic• buildings hoe developed alanq Haven Avenue south of Foothill Boulevard. Proximity to Footnill Bpu UVard, the 1-30 freeway and Ontario Airport are among tn• •ttracti one of tna! •it• 6or firms which serve • broatler regional market that in many lost aneef ex tend^ beyond the boundarfes of Rancho Cucamonga. Community-scale self vi ties such as medi eel offf css, branch banks and similar ki nd• of aetivi ties tend to b• spread out sn individual buffo+~;~ _- ~,;..:: trusters located •3 onq principal thor ought arcs throughout the remainder pf the city. Th• principal •it• consideration for these offic• deve7 opmants !a good sec ass to the Iocal market as def inetl by residential patterns and tr•ffie flaws. Because Of Lhe si s• and lot atSOn of the site at BaMlln• Avenw and Hellman Avenue, any offic• development for ihss OP-soned veeert parcel ~eould h:ve to draw upon the community-scale portipn o+ the overall offi a market. In order to determsn• the market potential for additf anal off ie• development, tNS URA staff eompleled • oetu lyd fi •id inventory of existing offic• uu• for the Alta Ldm• study X333 ~. area in December 1987. Th• fol3owsng action of th• report provitlee a tli ecussi on of exi a4ing office uua within th• Alta Loma area •l onq with an analysis of market potential for k.y eegmar.ta vi th• overall offic• market. Exi stsng,Qific• fagl_+y1 (Sion• Th• Rlta Loma area contains slightly mor• than 240,000 square feet ofi offic• spac• f7ab1. 1). Of this total, 160,000 squar• fpt or approximately two-thirds Ss fountl in ^mall to medium shed oiile• bulltlinge located on or adjacent to Bowline Avenue <Fi gars 1 and 7ab1. 2). Th• remainder--some 83,00'0 squar• fat--occurs Sn con iunetion with rstas: uses within the numerous shopping centers touted at kwy intersections tnraugheu! the area. metlscal offices, which occupy about 23X of th• total of;sc• spac• snventory, comprise th• largest single offic• category within the Alt• Lama area fTabl• 1). 0thsr important offic• ups include dent Ute, finane!•1 inetitutlon• and prof essl onal services ^ueh as insurance, real estate, antl law office!. TogetMr with metllcai ofilCes, then uue aeeouM for Aver 160,000 squar• feet df esaice apace ar •ppraximately 707. of the total offic• inventory. Mssc •llaneou^ small offic• uue comprise the remaining 34X of the total. a3~G Calgary Financsals Aankf Savsngf G Loans Othfr Financial Total FlnanCial TAPLE 1. OFFICE SPACE INVENTOkV ALYA LOMA COMMUNITY AREA Exiftinq EftsmaNd Supply Dfmano tfOuarf ffft) :1,000 15,106 19~4Q4 57,700 Mfalth Grf, Midi cal Offieff 61,800 Ofnt al Officff f~iQQQ Total Mfalth Car• 74', BOtl Fr offffional Sfrvic~a, Infurancf & R.E. :0,300 ~~y~. 9y40Q Total Prof. Sfr. 29,700 Gfneral Officf~ 65,000 Vacant Oificf 9pacfi 16,000 58,200 Unmet Damand <Ovfrfupply> 300 ^.f. 73,100 <1,700> f.f. 25,200 i4,500r f.f. 43,200 :.21 ,BOOT TOTAL OiF1CEi 245,200 199,700 <4„ 500: Vfcancy RaL~ 6.6 % Ovfrfuppl y~ 17.9 Sou rcfi Fiald sur vfy and dfmano motltrl linq by Urban kfuarch Asfociatff, Dfcfmbfr 1967. ~3S ~, t W a i_1 K C7 Z O< ~ ~ m4 U< lL Q ~ ~ C7 F z~ p„ 4 N x W any esow~aN m a ny PIeQ!4o~y d m V ny uewl!aH * t ~ W V N L C V7 N O m W ~• ~ c 1$ UB!!aUJB~ LL i ~~•~ ~ ~ .~. e m = ~ i• ~'~ ~ G /' a ' . ~ ~ G~ ~ ~~ _~' o i- ~3b Q. ,, TABLE .. E%IBTINO OFFICE BUILDINBB ALTA LOMA AREA Buildlnp A. Mwdical CMtor Nw egrnwr Baulin• wnd Amwthywt B. Baswtinw Buof nwss Contwr NE carnwr Bwultno wnd Moll Drat C. Forsc ast Pref osoi oral CMtor SE corner Bav11n• and Mwllwan D. Los Areas 8W cornwr Bwwolino wnd Bwryl E. 7ho Eachwngo SE corner Bwwllno wnd Grnollan F. Rwnchq Cucwwongw Mwdl Cifl Bulldf nq Carnwliwn wouth e4 Bwg11M Tglali Arsa l8q Ft) 3400 72000 18300 14700 47300 4600 160100 Sourew~ Flwld lnvwntory by Urban Roureh Aosoeiwtow~ Dweombor 1987. a3 ~ 8. By comparing Che exnsting of isc• sp ac• inventory with deman0 estimates based on averaq• per capita offi a epac• uus for comparable communiti o, st ss posai bl• to measure the tlagra to whsch the exi atf nq supply masts the expected demano. Yh• results of this anal ysi• lnoicaL a condition Of market equslf brium ar oversupply for moat major categories of uses tTable i>. The predicted spats demand of 38,200 squar• fret for financial instiGutians and 73.100 squar• feet for health care servius are •l most exactly in balance with the exiatinq euppl y. Proieesi onal services show an overaupply amounting to about 13X, while the general offie category snows an wwn graalK~over wpply--37,890 squar• feet or nearly one-half of the tatai supply of general offie• space. Fri tl~e M~,k~f, s,Onditions In order to untlerstand the market patenti al for •aditf onal offie spae• in the A1la Loma area over the next :ew years, st sa nee essary to con si0er the repent rate of offie epac• absorption, rxl sting supply/damantl eonditlons, expee4d growth ai deaNnd for oif ie• uaee, and planned additions to the existing euppi y. Th• rate of absorption in the of fic• market in recent years is anti mated to have bean approx- i mateiy 24,000 squar• fee! peP year. Viewed from this per sp •citve, the 16,000 squar• feet of vaunt offie space yn •xiattnq oific• buildinq• does not reprUent ^ fersoue ~3 ~ 9, overeupPl y. However, th• otner indicalar• of ;utur• affsu poCMti al suggeet that th• actual market Por new affic• 6uild,i nqe i• likely to b• small or non-exletent. It is unllkd y that protected ratty of popul ali on growth will wpport continued space abeorpti on at rater comparable to those occurring !n recant years. host of the area's growth has already occurred. Over the next few years, popu Ltion in the A1!• Losa area should SncreaN by lees than one percent per year. Th• marksL ef: ect ai ~sl ow growth in ofilce epau dsmMA is likely to be aggravated by subslan!!al new additiane to the fuppl y. Two additional meth cal offlee bullet nnr `.o.•s ~~~~~ propovd for Ch• Al t• Loma aru, one eontalnlnq 23,000 squar• lest lacaLd at Baulln• and ArchibalA, and another with 6,231 squar• feet 3auteA •t @ase3in• and Beryl. In addition, the expseteo rel oeati an of the city government f unc!lans tram 1t• temporary apace on 8usiin• near Hellman is expected !o release an additi on •1 23,000 squar• feet to the serket by mid-tq@9, 7hie total of 96,000 squar• feel of an;1c1p6te0 Tow wnn _.-„ptpv' epac •, .combined with ih• eHS Sting 36,000 sgwr• fee! of vacant space, represents a potential oversupply of subeUntial proportions glum the e:,pscted al ow ra!• of growth 1n new demanO. ~-3 ~' n r 1!~. The Renional Qf f_S!L M1aLSs Th• overall offic• market in Fancho Cucamonq• if dominated by th• emerging regional offic• complex Q onq Haven Avenw aoutw pf Feot.`.i 1: Soul ward. This eoneen tr anon of medium and larq• offic• builtlinge ha• become an •ttracti va louti on for iirme which require larq• amounts of sp ace or a mor• pr atigioue lacati on, a will as thou looking for good ac use to the broader regi ona7 market. Although no accuraU inventory of offic buiidlnps i• available, the overall supply i• clearly many times that of the small concMtre- ti on found along Baseline Avenue. 9eme idea of the magnitude of dwel opment along Haven un be seen sn the morn that 200,000 aquae fpt of proJeete approved in bath 1986 and 1996 whirw ~,...~ - ..,_- awn sumps ec ep or are fli 11 under tlwel opment. Becws• the market is dominated by new construction, the typically hf qh wuncy rates prbvid• little upfui inf ormelimn about market cnndltions. The ab aorptson of new space Lhrouqh leuinq agreements, currently running •t an estimated 100,000 to 160,000 square feet per yqr and doubling wary !wo years, i• a better indicator of the area's relatsvely healthy market sends ti or., ?he avaslabilsty of •n ample supply of modern nffic• apac• al onq Maven may weaken demand for new construction •l onq 6aseL ne. Generally spsaki nq, however, U• two areas draw upon vK y d14f Brent segmin f,e of the OffiC• market. a~ :I. III. ?E7A:~ 3EC-;iR P~i7ENTi At_3 'r.: isolation of tn• property under consitleration from cr~• mayor office area xr. Fancho Cucamonga, rising oversu ppl. of office spats, and tn• rslacively sca!1 p-.r ca: size a:i imply that retail ousinesses mast stutly as a tlevelopment a! vrnative. Pr os pecx:ve customers at businesses in such a canter wtil be drawn primarily from th• nor thwescern por- tion of tn• city. Urban Research Assou •tes taus has delim- ited a relevant trails arses to ioentify the levels pf existing and to tur• market support •s wall as th• pat Nrn of retail competition, This section examines tMt consumer support base along wi to the tleY~ilad attributes of competitive reCJll CQntOe an that trod! area. ~~~+:!_.r._ ...~. .. wee a^ office along Baseline in Alta Lpm• are supported almost •xclus rvely by resiCents of near oy vighborhootls. On• must cpnsi tler various tlemograpr~ic factors such of total population, nousenold size, household type, and income di strxbution patterns in estimating commer- cial land use potentials. Moreover, interest shoultl focus on those types of retu 1 or service usrs wnicn can serve as anchors or maq net^ to give tn• untgr ar. :dani:ty ono r..c;!t- tng drawing power. A enter of miscellaneous wes, d• they pthice tenanPS or retu l firms, often brings with it a Host of potential problems. inclutlinq high business turnover ant dimtnisned rwenul poCmtla 1. ~/ / Tra~~_ArRO_an d_POpula[iq?_:rsg Far Lois analysis. Urban RgSeirCh A49pCiaC9a Cefindd the rectangular trade area shown •arl:er. It is comparaple Cp d "cammun:ty-9Ci1!" mir4 •i deco) sods 3S. it I:: tOn OS roug rely an• to on rantl-a-half miles from tn• property. Tn¢ southern limit reaches dust south of Church Street, retlscr- ing the snatlow effect of Foothill Bculawrd oevelopmen t. Population tlynamics for this Alta Loma trade area and for en• City of Ran coo Cucamonga are ehodn in Table 3. Th• appro;:imately 37,.700 refidente in Alta Lama con sti to t• about 4J per cant of the city's total population. During the 1980s this area's pppulatipm'has increased at • rate com parable to that of tn• city as a whale (6.7 % per year versus 7.921. .:.e,, ...y or Housing tracts in the pldnned communities of J: ctpria and 'errs Vista since 1987 signal a shift of the growth canter turther to the asst, a ph-npmenon which will con now through the end •ot t!11s century. Hence, Alta soma will take on a "maturing pr settling-in" character rather Loan that of tn• rapid change which dominated its appearance between 1970 ono N.• mip-19B0s. ?t!!O 3 aw ip compares hpueenOld CrriN Cter 1lt3Ge in Alta Loma wiry, those of tr.• Csty of Rancho Cucamonga. Posed pn figures pr OVitleO by tree ~allfprnla Department pf F1nanCe and Urban Gec:sicn 9ystema, :here are donut 1=,800 households today in ~~ l_ TAPLE 3. C6NSUMER PFPFILES AL TA LOMA AREA AND RANCHu CUCAMUNGA CI7~ Rancho In tlicator Alta Lama Cucamonga Arsa City Pn~+~_1._. r, July 1. 1987 Eft. 7a tal J], 330 84,000 1980 Total 22,3b0 ]], 2]3 Annual Growth Rate ('/.) 6.] ].9 July 1, 1987 Est. Housfholds 1'2,830 26,400 Psrsans Psr Household 2.74 3.17 Aq• and Ethnicity !1980 ProTils) nstlian Aq• 27.0 26.6 Psresnt Under Aq• 6 32.7 t2.8 Psresnt Aq• 6 - 17 23.3 22.7 Psresnt iyvsr Aqs ]] 9.2 10.1 Psresnt Non-Mispantc Whit• 76.] 70.3 Psresnt Hifpantc 12.6 16.7 Empl oymsnt (1980 Prots l~s) ?o tal 10,314 24,943 Employ ess Psr Houfsholtl 1.72 1.47 Whlt• Collar WOrklrf! ProT. anA T~r~r, mss, .•!~ iv.v lp.4 Managerial antl Proprietor fX) 14.9 13.i C1 •rical antl Salsf ('/.) 29.] 28.9 Crafts and !ipsrative Pralvfsipns 23.0 26.6 Houf inq Psresnt in On•-unit Structures 90.6 78.3 Psr unt !iwnsr Ocdupisd' 84.2 79.8 Notssi Aqs, Ethnicity, and Employment fiqurss are 1980 con- ditsonf. All Diner data reflect mttl-1987 sstlma Ns. Employment data ar• by plats oT restdencs, nae p.ac• oT Work. Saurcesi California Stat• Department aT Finance, Urban tleciston Systsmf, Inc. and 1980 U. S. Cen su• of Population ono Housing. Psresnraq• calculations by Urban Refesr cn Associate!. Y~ the trade area oP Tne pYOposetl cm ter, 7h3 d~'eraq! npUS!- gpld 913. Of `. 71 p1Y4pne 14 ldwer LndO the dVfrdge rpr rr~e city (3.17), 113ustratsng tn• beg innings of nelghdonc~pp ataplll:atipn. Gwnar occuoancu +~ k~3 ^.cus:r.-y ,,,ar~a2 ana de rtu Hance of sinal• tams ly homes are also mor• cnaracteris- ..C pf th35 aria than of tn• rlmalnder of Rancha CUCdrtiC nqa. nsgrier elevation Housing distrtcts ana well-maintained matur- ing neighborhopds are generally accompanied by high in[ome prpflles, ie pn• mtght •xpe Ct. Accar ding to 1nCpme 1lTlmiTee preoared by Urban Deciu on Systems, M• median household tn- com^ for Alta Loma in 1987 was f 37,<`13 a! •nown in Tabl• a. rpr Rancnp Cucamonq• last year Si waa s 30,474, ibis means :Hat Half of all households haO incamla above and r,alf hap .-._ca,~~ .,a/uw vnos• amounts. Th• tratle area mldian incortw fhL~.s :s .J.1 percent above ih• mldian for the city, D~,ir.ng 1987, almost half of all trade •re• hpUSeholds r,ad gro4s it comes above s 40,0001 the comparable ttguYe far the city was 4..4 percent. iiverall, the demographic and incom! protilee signal a strenq reuil market --- a large group bf young, though ma hiring fam,iy-br:pnt~,', r.pw sehaips, rt~ost of venom nave lived to me • area 'or close to a tlecade pr mar! but who no Ionger .'on- ~: .er -r,emselvea 'newcomers." Basic necessities and such :'ems a3 ncm• furnlsnings and quail ty wearing apparel are p"SJrtt:29 among ihi4 Riarr e[ ilgmen t. Dining OUL ~~ TAEIE b. ESTIMA 7ED tN0?ME PROFILES AL TA L9MA AREA AND CITV ~?F RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 1987 Rancho Alta Loma Cucamangn ltfm Arfa vi [y Aggrfgat• In comf in Millionf f 49].0 f 1,11_.3 Median Howfhold Incomf • 37.217. s 30,47h. Pfr Capita Incomf f 14,010. f 13,241. Pfrcfnt of Housrnold Incomfs~ 8f for f 1],000 9.6 X 33.] X ! 1],000 - f 19,999 4.8 ].6 f :0,000 - f '4.999 8.6 7.3 s :],000 - f <`9, 999 10.. 11.0 v, Wary - a JY, YY9 ..~. e ..-. .. f 40,000 - f 49,999 18.5 17.E f 50,000 •nd Abovf ]7.7 .5.:: Ind1x at Alta Lama Arfa Mfdlan to City Mldiani 112.1 SOUrefl Urban Dfu sign Systfmf, Inc. updat) trom 1980 cfnfus rfcor d! •nd Vrban Rfvarch Associatfs calcula- tions. ~vs :>. i7Aewise is a hxghly rsgarOed act:vxty, [Hough qualxty din:^.~ raper uncea must 6e tempered w:th concern For value. ~e-ag1 ~wgl,ogm~nt_PatTerns ?es. don'. of 2h• Aica Loma ctlmmunity era aervetl by numerous c,nven unc• anq nn gn6ornood-Ievel ratan cen Mrs, Follow- ing th• cxty policy ofi no oal deveippmwnt, pr ciuster:nq, ~trtual3y all such enters arw located at th• tntersectipn pF mayor arterial atrats. As shown in Figur• ?, th• molt prominent retail clusters may 6e tound aC ih• uunctur• of Archibald b Baselineq Carvlian d 19tA7 and Baswlin• 6 Car- nelson. 7ha detailed conFiguratian of each commercial center xs descriped in 7ab1. 3. In th• aggregate, these canters and a smaller number pt fireestandinq businesses, provide over oa0, 000 square feat of anopping ppportunitiws /or *.he Alta soma area. Va can o es ar• rare, undwrscoring the stability and strong M of local consumer demon d. Uur Held analyst Found duet 1.`,700 square teat in vacant modules, Far • modest vacancy rate o/ 1.9 percent. A normal retail vacan Cy Nctor falls within tn• four-tp-seven percent rang o. True neighborhood-l wei Centers here are anchored by mau or chain supermarkets and aver aq• 76,600 square [set of grosf .easable arra. Virtually all tncor pore h a Meaetanding .~ / ~~7 m x N rz >~ rm 1 >~ ~A m ~^ >Z m 0 c m N ~Z3r L 0 C I I w w a • 3 it 3 ~ a 3 a N.. b a n i I L A L a O L D NO P N L C i ~ « v N w y~ B '~ L A G N i M O c ¢ o u s N I a L a m m p o` i j a y" _° c A A ' w u nu m~..r mc_ cv~ c G . L N 0 V t N . C « y L a a w a u N A N .. a. A A d a C¢ r -. L A U A a. ~ / L C/ w a c ~ G 8 n J G F- 0 N 9 C G 0 O N N :I c~ -o Nn a - mA aw Sao ca ' v i Aw m am TnL oL Aic «cmm a cr. N.+ a .3 A L ../ .. `a v c ro ^ a m a .v ro n~i a+ N c m v c I c v .. > u v / c roro i rorc O c $~ a•-u Lu a~-r+ a ro L ~ e« ro JI > 0 m u L w y / » L g L w I I 1 u m M a o L u ~+ a G a s C 1 1 m O C u ~ aa L W U LI~ r)y 0 ro C w y c a Q ^Q I i S T G O 2 Z^ tL N Q f ') Z a1 S U I j U tl Z I I 6 S I I L -• I I ~' 1 1 I J •+ I ' •+ I •J I n I f1 Q- I I ? P P m d P M ':: 2 J i n UPI i Q ~ .. .. u't ~.`~ r ~0 -~ Z Z ;l] C I C G C C ~ Z Q I - -~ I mal oa a m - z ~ ~ w a 6 N w a ~ « J_ J I a wro W {p to to P P P P y2 U N l -J2 ~ A i 01d b i i .D ~0 d L.p it C y ~ O ~ /v D 9 D 9 C 9 C .m. c c a+ L A C A A i J I L C ~ ro ro A V ro a s .. 9 1 _' 7 D a D d d ~... V .. ~ C I H L ~ AL LL L L a C JIC ~ C A I U \ V ~ U a U a U V l w L A L I I \ L L n L l L A + ro -• A I Y 1 A Q N Q ~ Q C Q w 4 a U « U a U I ~ 1 / C• V• L. C• L A 1 c 1 r L a L m i L W L a L ° ~ e i I • I m a a s c o 0 o a a a c 0 , V i n 2 U L U J U y 1Wy V ~ U ~ U \ U J U I I _aY 4CA a3 22 mZ C ~_ N i mii - • I 6 Q W+ ] N U ~ Qv a a A J ' L~ I Q G V m :L LL l9 Y u ~~~ ~ - v Q ~ i a~ O• ~ ~ ] .A. ~ 6 r . ]] a~ ~] T o ti~ a¢ ~~ ~C Y 1 0 b i] N a w "n ~. i ~C n 0 +D a M ] ~ oT c •" A 3n° '~ 3 5c 1 d i 0 I V I N C Li fl N on i ~A ] Y T N Y n n r Y ] u - L r D n T N ~ p• t< ~ 3 i ? r ~ Y O i A Y C ~ A „' T n ] ..~ ~ I I I I py I I D i I I I I • ] w 1 • ] a i~ T i ~ i < i ] ~ I n ~ i y ~~ ~ i K i n~= # ~~ w i ~ i m ~ " ' i gy I - m Y i I yy C S D ~ I i N 1 ] m u C q Y ~pppOn +i pY 1~ 4 ~ 0 ~ , • 7 M 0 T Y T ~^ A Y 7 p Y T ~ °~ rd d i A ] A ] 'RA an ip CdTT n n$] b A Y„ A~, Q y IJ d l ]a]~ ] y~ • ~B R 7 IC ~ Y T A w b :~ N n ~ _ M l I C n I I ` ~ {z D ~ j 2 m I V N I I ] ys i w~ L N -DD r T ° ~ r G I I 3 j = D I 3 ~ y D a ! I I I y n I r I • 4 ~ i nn g M I q C I y I TT M I N N i T/ .J. Last food rf staurant. At several a:tfs tnf neaghbornodd Cfntfr4 ir• }link'fd by CGOVfnlfngf Cfn tfrs p} :'. 00Q - ~0. x(30 square fN t. Convfnifn of untfr! prpvldl spaCf tar iowfr- L'q lUm• tfnant! And. in 9om• 3natanCf s. rf prfflnt tn• in1t1d1 pnasss of larger proposlo compl s::fs. Slnc• tn• tall of 1987, new rataal projscH totallang about 118.000 spuar• tfft hays 6ssn cpmplsted ~n the Alta'~cma area. MOrf than 96 plr cfnt of that nfW fpigf Waf pCCUplfd at ttu tams of our }alld lnvsntory. This 3mDllss a commfr- clal absorption rat! pt 70,700 sawr• Pest pfr year during th• la Hat .7 month psr loo. In Ilght of tM bslpw-average vacancy !actor avfrall~•~t of marks! may stall bf under dfvflopfd in se UCted catsq or ass o} rataal and service !unctions. ~~ia ,or rltdil Cpnstructl0^ Con tinulf •lffwhf rf Witnln `. hG C3 ty pf Rancho Cucamonga. Two of thf largest sucn pro~scts arf tnf 13.1 acr• Varginta Dar• spfalalty cfntfr and a 17.3 acr• cpmmunaCy -scals'rwntfr unosrway at Basslln• anq Navsn. Th• !attar of Chess, 7srra Vista Vallags, as a Daekfr-Marmington dfvf lopmfnt wr~a en fvfneually may contain as much a• Sc1,000 sduarr }fat of r•taal spat!. Slnc• tnssf and other smaller r•tait pr^;accy a:pnu Faoth,il you +. m•: arC ara incomplf t• and s o 11 in Thslr lsafrup phafe, vacancy and apsprptton •stlmarfs For en• city as a whol^ would bf vlrtuaily r~fantnq lfss. ~~ alta_~gm~._?r o,i~cts }n_~ipellna C;ty plann;nq and builtling art:coals were conracteo regartl- inq th• status of cpmmercial pro~acts under construction one ^roposetl for the Alta Loma community area. As of Lnis Ws:t:rq, tr~vr• are on:y four retail er offiu prowCts in the development pipeline whicn may 6e comps titlva tc tr,• enter prbpoaed Par Baseline and Hellman. Character;3ti cs or those have bqn euTl rnad ;n Table 6. Tn• office prapo sais were tliscussed previeusly in Chapter I1. Altnough ea cn of thane pro,l ctrl lies withan a halt mile of tn• Baseline/Nellmac nice, none signities any mayor cMnge to qen oral market con di:tions. Tne principal result will be an intensifi utien of the cammer cial node at Arenibald antl Baseline. Scutnwast Savings plans further dwalopmant on :ts 5.9 acre mi::ed-use property with the bulk of future construction likely to be allocated tp office uses. Wairiu ?raper ties also nos proposed 39,990 square feet of retail uses to be built on 3.6 acres oust north of the •::istinq Alpna Bsta center. As With •11 types of development propesals, tn• real a alien of these is subtract to soma uncertaint~l. Timing normally is delayed and land use concepts fregwntly are modified. ~encv, the pr ou ect cnaracteristiCS fhown in Tabi• a enoulo oe incarpreCed as a general rt~ar/at prospect ratner Man as an a::act picture. 2s/ + 1 I . n 9 I I N L7 a a •S I I \ « N C I g -~ C 0 a L N .~ 1 ~ O^ N n C U N« ' N U 0 •. O V B G i . 9 N a J n 0• A ul 1 P a> 1 n a ~+ m P -• ~ a 1 c 7a~\ .a ~ « t Y 3 n !g 0 a m ~ ^I G 1 ~ I N a C 9 ~ ' _ N N > O a a y a N 9 I a~ g ~ N > N L Z ~ N 9 9 n P G N O O a magi am- nmaL n,. Z I , a \ m ~.J a u ¢ O C Z I I a L ti In9~ .- L n L a z I -a , a a m a a a u J I I a I 1 Z I a ..a i ~ i 0 m l 7 ~`J ma d m~ ~] 2 ' 1 V1 L I~ L 111 L Y'1 L _ i Q m I ~ ~ QQQ I I Na a ma ^I ~ Z U I 1 7 •~ V I L ~ N V i L« I « a 7 t a L I N N a~ • 0 iv ~ an 1 ~a Y C ~« ~~ Z I D U I C a U ^ L d ~ Q y I Z a-l I «> L 2 OQ i nm H 7 1 Q, 2a Q p 2 1 I Z a i a L ~1 T I a 9 C I « ~~ J ~ 0 1 C 01 9 y I I a L a 'a i n i ~ r am < a ¢ O I u a U D .q ~ J i 9 a J 1 + ~ s a ~ •+ I C I G D , 1 n 1 c L: 1 I ~ u ac m I c l L U u 1 0 1 ~• a L ~ q L I ~ as SOp r j « 1 e y a J ' I a l « L L e .d e I L ~ U u U J I U I a a a a p I N i 9 N N -. U y Z W N ' ~ U W 9 N N 3 E m 1 L L N 1 I ~ G i ri Asa O P c L ea ui 0 01 N -~ T ]I r>ie G 7 M L D ~ a C a 7aa D: M u~i a . +I a « U alm 0 C N oe~a m< ~ L `u o L L ~ o• a N `u a C t L « ¢am 0«fl L J « nv sae uoa u 0 11 .3. ~9!2311_4gm3n_4_tl441d };ng In order to determine the mul'et prospects tar specific retail ufee at th3f 30Gt10n. Urban Research ASiOClatee simulated tn• tlemand lrvels far key anchor-type tenants and t.nen compared results of that motlellinq with t:ndings from the existing land usr Inventory. Tn• demand model used by URA takes Into account household characteristics antl typical western Inland Empire •xpentliture patterns for retail goods antl consumer services. Findings from the modelling process tMn provide a basis far the eventual site development con upt. ?he simulation was prepired tar functions which typically serve as anchors or destinations in neighborhood centers. Restaurants. Wnil• hat true '+^~~^r~,' ~-. ;~~~v. yeneraTOrS dt patrons, particularly whero conditions do not lend thom- solves to a supermarket ^ncAOr. Because of their abundance in tn• Alta Vif to areal fast-food restaurants were not included in tA• simulation. in aggreqetw land use terms both supermarkets and drug storN •r• ir. appro:u mate equilibrium where supply is In oalanee With mar3r~t ~e-and c5ce Tillie :;. j^. -_,~., ai tl less than half tM total market potm teal today /s addressed oy n:istlnq stores in tn• •pparei end speu •lty grocery lines. Part~i :y-oriented res Nurants as well ^s ethnic ar ~$3 TAELE ? SUMMARY OF hEV RETAIL TENANT CnNDITIONS ALTA L!iMA MAghE7 AREA, DECEMBER 3987 Current E;:sstsnq Mar6et Functional Category Dlmantl Supply °rosplcc ____________________________ ___S$~L_2__ -__S9r1_1___ Grv ary Stvref 13:,600 1]7,540 -- Specsalty Grocery + 8,.00 - 3,040 H,r. 1,10@ Drug 46,000 45, 4'S0 -- Apparel 16,400 6,00 N.F. Famsly Restaurants 37,500 13,700 N.F. Ethnic/Specialty Res taur. 16,900 7,600 M.F. +inplutlq meat, dish, and poultry= rrefh !roil •ntl vlgeta bl• markets •nd dell outlets. Sourr~. ci~IC -_ ,~~~,~ •np Hntl use demantl mptlellinq by Urban Reaearcn Associates, December 1987. ~~ ~ r .5. h3gner-end dining oppvrrun:t3as arc unpersuppl ud oy a wits margin. Specialty grocers such as meat markets, delis, and fresh _r^du ce slot aG annoy gooa customer suDPOrt 3n higher income areas comparabl• to Alta Lama. That grocery category actually m compasus a wade range of specialty types, an- clu ding Health Poods and bakeries 3n addition to th• product lanes alroady nofcd. Hued on national norms, consumer tlemano supports between 5,:00 and 9,600 squar• tees of such stores for each 100,000 fquar• feet of supermarket (pace. TAerefore, th• Alta Loma trade arse currently is un dersupplied by 5,_00 - 1_,100 squar• fist an the specialty groury lines. That shortfall Has been accammodatsd tp some extent by the orear.r-rn>~-~.,~ot`oC f.c_. .. .. ui iuaa-acne grocery stores an thss area where many supermarkets are tahely to include ba~ery and dell departments. Restaurants, other loan fast-footl drave-thru outlets, al ao represent a retail sector opportunity. Family-araent~o restaurants appear to haw slightly higher support than o0 ethnic or specialty •aterles. Regional chains of the first ty p!, es:ch aG Hiker'a Sn~~>r/. Co_. :, yr iara• i.aiiendar's ar• conspicuously absent. ~lairiy, Certain recall buelnef fff and rp twurant elrVicef or'er me man •r support nor found for office-ryp• uses. ~5~ .h. Ai[hough a number of service o~~s mess types, in clutltng restaurants. era permtttetl to me Office/Pratvf atonal land use tlistrict. rN triCtive ppndlripn9 accompany inert approval. For e•;ample, reftaUran2! wntcn Serve wns. a common practice art~ong better Nmily restaurants, must pass through Nye con- Cit:onal use permit process, incurring financial Costs nct associated wttn their lace tion to Neighoprhopd Commercial diatrictf. Moreover, two potential anchor usws aY thla location, specialty tdotl stores or ^pparsl shops, are d aallowed under the. current land use policy. Vet, they currently have sir onger market support than most alter- native functions. Ar ~a_Fgr~ca3;0 wean mar6 et analuses are und.rtav~.. •~ -_p_. q~pW.6 communit vs i[ is tot tructlve to know tt future reatdential Cevelopmmt may df amatacally change the population stce or Ch arac Nr pf tn! afffCYed market area, Af notfd firlilr, appr o::tmately 35,700 plople live in the Alta Lama area of Pancho Cucamonga. The city's planning ftatf forecasts the addition of 8,719 tlwellinq units to the Alta Loma and Cuca- .t~onga arses between !997 and the year =010 bulldout. the ~isYriGwtiOn Of vacant reftdentlil ltoef aUggef is foal apdut pne-cr,ird pf that ntm~ber will be In Alta soma. Multiplying Lr~e of tlmdild innUal tncr Hi! In hOUfinq wnlff for the Arta .:;•,1 t:mee cne average npuf enpld fire t~. 74) prOtlu Cff a ~5~ rougn Htima tf at thf average annual population growth in- crfmmt for Al G Loma (310 pfrsonf per yfar). Application of that mfthotl to antics patfd changf betwgn mitl-1987 and 399 impl us loaf five yfarf trdm now the [radf ^rfa will nave a total population on tn• or dfr of 3e,900. Tbat would bf only • slight gain of 4.4 pfrcfnt aoovf the lfvfl of today. Ir, sum, canfumfr support for local rftu 1, sfrvicf, and atficf land usfs in Alta Lama fivf yfar^ from nor rill ndt difffr radically from tn• prfsfnt support bau. ~5~ _~. REFeRENCES Barrett. G. Vsncrnt antl Jonn P. Blair N41_t4_~4nCust_ang_Ana~yiR_F!!i_S3Sl .! MlrESS_!^_9_Esal14}}}Sy _SSSlA1!!_ Mew Vork: Van Noatran0 Revnhol tl, 1980 . Buller, Brao 'SCAG Dssaggregatvon of Demographsc/Hpussnq/ Employment Forecasts" memo to kerry Fprsy to:, San Berner bsno Aesbciatetl Governments, May 7, 3986. Da vacs, R. L. antl D. 5. Roger s, etls. SSgL'L64Sl S14D_!D9_a4S4C!_93!!t!?•!DS_9!3llCSR• (Ctrs cnester and Mew Vorks John Wsley d Sons, 19B4Y. City of Rancho Cucamonga, Communsty Development Department, "MOntnly Status Report' (Npvember 1987). Cs ty of Rancho Cucamonga. D!yllpQm~nR_C~44!• Chapter 1?. 12 "Commeresa:i 6ftsce Dssericte' tDecwmber 1987). Urban L-ntl Inf LttULe. 44!!!re_&_Clnt!_gf_SIYQpQ}^_9_SlDSlC~}_1987. (Wasnsngtonv Th• Urban lantl Inststute, 1987), Ur Can Research AfsOCiates. "Baselsnw Economic Analy s s Footnsll Boulevartl Corrstlor, Rancho Cucamonga, CA." (Fullerton, CAs proceesetl, July 19861. dV v ;. ~~ ~ ash Sec G on : ".: ). ]; J C• Oeneal CosatsraLl DbtllM (OCh Ttils dbiriet is intenGd tar Qenerel commrdal actlv(tlss and sarvlcas of ^ more intaroiw nature. Thasa was would W iogtad primarily alon< major LraneportaUon routes and would inoluM major shoppitK taallltlee, major >tevloa-or4neM ura, mejar tlmneial and rnrporate haadquartan which an dufpiad to larva tM City or tM ra`lan r ^ whWa. s.oaaa ly.ladu a• taeubtlos Usn listed in TaDla 17.10.000 shall M allowaDL to ono ar more of tM commarclal d~tr!ct7 as ttir'latad !n t:s oelumn Danaath uoh eammaraiai district. When indicated with fM boar "P", tM ur dull W • permtttad uae b that dbtrict. tyMn Indigtad wiN tM bttae "C", tM uN shall be a COllditlallal ur auDjaet to tM Conditlonal Uaa Permit ptCCer. b tM avant tMn b dUtlaultq in gtgorl>itK a Qiwn use b one of tM dbtMets, LM proaadun WttlMd b SaMtgf 17.02.00 shall Da toUowad. rASts lr.u.as ass saaot.Artoss roc oo~oaactAworrtca asrrlucta asa ar sc ac A. Otttcaf and aebtad 0aaa 1. Adminlatntiw and axaauUw attlea. p p p Z. Mtirt and pMtapaptUO rt11010a, not P P P includln< tM sale of .aquipmant a wppu.e. 3. Clerical and protasdonal ottleas. P P P 4. Pinanelel servleaa aM ImtiruHror. O e . S. Nadfeal, dental and rWtad MalUi P p p services (non-utimal nlatad) includiK laDoratoria and cUNcet oNy tM sob of artiClea a1..rly inaidantal to tM Wvlga provided shall q parmittad. 8. PtwcrlpUan pharmaMM, (abo wMn P P P located wlWn a tatUdln< oontalNtK tM otUga of 8 ae man medical praODUonen) 7. Paella DaUdltep (Lbrary, Mty and county P P P ~ }~~ ~N Nstricta and poet ot 8. PuDUc utlUty sarviq oltlep. p p p 9. PuDUc safety facility (poUq, ttre, C C C ambulance end paramedics). d"~~ ~ "H" I Secucn i7.i 7, 7yp 068 O! NC CC 10. 144ted oommaecial uses (bluapeinting, P p p atattona'Y, Qdck roPY, etc.) when inctdantal to an ottlca taWding a complex. B. Gsnanl Commetdal Uar .. Aatigisa Ykpit - P P Z Adult Ougnaaa (sea apaofal ngdnmenb - - C pee Saetlan 17.10.080) 8. ANmai Can PacWty (Wmal haapltal, wteelntlan, commardal kamal, geoomin<). (a) @xeWding extatiae kanml, pan, a' C P P ~uro. (b) Ineluding,axtae(ae kauNl, par, ar etur. - - ~ 4. Apparel atom. - P P S. AM, mualc and photagraph)o atudla atld C p p supply staew. 8. AppWnca stars and repair. - C p 7. Arcades (aaa apadal nquinmanb pa - C C Section 17.30.080 F.) 8. Athletio and Health Club, gyms and P P P weight reducing cliNaa. 9. AutomoUw aarHcu (including motatcyclaa, boats, traLLar and dmpar) (a) salsa C - C (bl nntab - - C (c) npiln (major angina work, muMae - - C sigpa, painting, body week and uphobtary) (d) Coinop washing C C L (e) Automatic washing C C C ~~ iec;wn : .: i. iSJ 08i OP NC t7C In Barvlce ar gnolltta dltpeMing C C P statloro gneludhtg minor repair such u erne-upa, brakN, batterir, tlrN, multlen) (g) ~ Parb and auppliN - P P lo. BakerlN iretall ody). - P P 11. Barba am bwuty attopa. P P P 12. Blegcle ahoq. - P P P P P 1S. Blueprint end plgtooopy aervicN le. Bat and groper 1alN ettd aervleN. - - (` 1S. Book, gift and rtatlottery rtorN (otMr C P p than adult nLted matertd). 16. Catttty stereo and aanfeetlenariea. - P P 17. Caterlttg estabWhmanb. - - p 18. Cieening and praealtg atabl)ahmenb. C P P 19. Carpenter stop a cabiMt attttp. - - ~ 20. Cocktail lottnge (bar, Wuttge, tavern) including related entertdnment. (a) Opersted iMapendent of a C - C raataurant (b) Acceatory to a raataurant C C C 21. Commarcid rsarutlan faeilltlee. IV Ltdoor trN ouch u bowling, C C P tMatars, Dillarda, (b) Outdoor tree such as golf, tennta. c C C kO~611t. iu~ O~ i-ci,npVYnp, ate. 22. Contractor yards (screening of outdoor - - C storage required). 2J. Dairy product stores. - P P 3ecuon :'.L1.7~~ WE OP HC GC 24. Deportment ![ores. - - P 25. Ddva-in budnaates, includtr~ [Milan. - C C (otMr then tut food restaunnN) 28. Drug starts and phsrmacia. - P P 27. Equipment rental Yards. - - C 2a. Past-tool ras4urants. C C P 29. Paod/Tack rterM - C P 30. Plarlst ahope. P P P 31. Food store and 7upormarkets. - P P 32. Purnitun rtoraar rapalr and upholstery. - P P 33. General retaLL stoma. - P P 34. Hardware etarea. - P P 3S. Homo improvement canton. (a) Notarial stored and veld within - P P enclaeed twildinga (b) Outdoor staroge of material such as - - C lumber do building materials 38. Hotels and Nodb. C - P 3?. toe Machines (outdoor). - C C 3B. Janitaral aervicaa and supplies. C P P 39. Jewelry atarea. - P P 40. Gundry-self-serWca. - P P 41. Glquor store. - P P 42. KIoaW far key shape, [!Im drape, etc. in - C c parking lore. 43, Locksmith shop. - P P 44. '.tini-storage for public use (no outdoor - - C storage). Sec;: nn :".:1J:7 ~E OP NC CC 45. MrtWriM and oamatrir. C C C M. Stotorayola aalw and arviM. - - C 41. Nawapapr and maiazina slur, prlntini C P and publlahini. 4B. NunaNr end iatden s~pplp storsfi ~ ~ proWdad, U tlra NC dlaatot, all pulpmant, wppLtw and malarial ara kpt wittdn r anClcaad ara4 49. OLDca and Dudnar machlna ataraa. C P P S0. Parldni taailitiw (oommardaU wham tar C - P an ehariad. S1. Political a phi4nthropla haadgwrbrs. C C P 52. Pot shop. - P P SS. PlumWni aMp and supptlr. P 54. PMtooopy P P P SS. Prlntini shopa. - P SE. Rr4uranb (otter than frt food). (a) With antrtainmant and/or srvlrq C C P of alrnhollc blvrair (b) Iraidantal srvini oL bar and wino P P P but without • axktail lowga, bar, antrtatnmant r datrelni 57. Racraational VMlola Rtorap Yard. C C C 58. 9hr ataeaa, aalr and typalr. - P P 59. ~aaotW-Rand ataeaa and perm shopa• P 80. 9hoypin[ Cantr su4)!at to prcYWom in - C C &id'uvn ii.1Y.070-C.b. 81. Spirituallat rudinis u wtroloiy - P Luecaatini. 82. Sportirri foods stores. - P P 69. Stamp end coin shops. - P P ~~ ~GJe't1Pti'f •N _5 _, Sect: on 17.iJ.JJO q~ OP NC GC 89. Swlmmine pool wppliaa. - P P BS. Tahoe. - P P 88. Taaidaemiata. - - P 81. Tabv+don, radio galas and aarWca. - P P 88. Tln fa1N and 7aevlaa. - - C 89. Toy atoraa. - P P 70. Tnval epodes. P P P 11. tTanspoetatlan tacilitlas (thin and twr, C C C taxi depots). 72. Truck and toile[ rental, gala and aaevlp. - - C 77. VWKy ataeaa. - P P i8. Vahiautae stomp yard and towkK aarvlca. - - C C. PuDUc and aaml-pubUc usN 1. Day Can PacUltl~ C C C L. LY,IY~IA,.TY Iap1Y4A a,R IIgIT(a0. V - V 3. Private and puDUc clubs and lod`a, C C C includirtt YMCA, YWCA and aimilu youth croup ogee. 4. EduaaUonal irotltutloro, parochial, private C C C (includlns coUapa and unlwnitlas). S. LibeaNM dt muaaums, public ar private. C C C 6. Patin and raaraaUan taaUlUa, pubUa ae C C C prlwta. 7. Publta util-ty iroUUaUoro. C C C B. Voeatlonal a Dualnss trab achoob. C C C 9. Churches, convene, monasteries and other C C C religious irotitutioro. ~~ u ~, r ~.+tK~ t ^ RESOLUTION N0. 88-24 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAl1ONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF A REQUEST TO AMEND THE LAND USE MAP OF THE GENERAL PLAN, 6PA 88-OlA, FROM OFFICE TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL Fpi 3.45 ACRES CF LAND LOLATEC ON THE SGU?HNEST CORNER OF BASE LIME ROAD AND HELLMAN AYENUf, PANLNO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKE FINOSNGS iH Sii(%PONT THEREOF A. Recitals. (i) James E. Caner has filed an application for the General P1 an grendment No. 88.O1A as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter 7n this Resolution, the subiect General Plan Apendment request is referred to as The Application. (111 On January 27, 1988, the Planning Coaaelssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on The Application and concluded said hearing on that date. (111) All legal prereWisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred, •' B. Resolution. NOM, THEREFORE, 1t is hereby found. deter~lned and recniw.n ti~ .tie rianning ~owtsston ar the City of Rancho Cucamonga as fellows: 1. This Canwtsslon hereby speciflcaliy finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution arc true and correct. 2. Based upon SuDstanttal evldente presented !o ihfs Coasaission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 27, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speclflcaily finds as follows: (e1 1Te Application applies to a 3.45 acre parcel of Land basically rectangular in configuration, located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Hellman Avenue. Said property is currently designated as Office an the Land Use Map of the General P1 an and is substantially vacant land except for an ex is Ling a^.0235 easement that aiRerf_a the property it . norm-south direction over which a two way driveway with central median is developed; and (D) The property to the north of the suDaect site is dezignated Low Residential (2-4 du/ac) on the Land Use Map of General Map and consists of a church site and surrounding Single family Residential, the property to the south of the subject site 1s designated Medium Residential (8- 14 du/ace on the Land Use Map of the General P1 an and consists of a multi- family apartment complex, the property to the East is designated Office on the Land Use Map of the General Plan and consists of a Service Stattan and Office ~~Oj° aLANN LVG COMMISSION RESOLJT;ON N0. 3d-:: RE: GPA 8&OlA Page 2 buildings, and the property to the west is designated C1vtc/Caaeatntty and Dark an the Land Use Map of the General Plan and consists of the public Library and Lions Park; and (c) The appiieation requests the Amendemnt of the Land Use Map of the General plan frost Office to Neighborhood Camaerctal 9or the 3.45 acre parcel; and (d) The application would not be consistent with the Land Use Elesaent of the General plan, could potentially result in significant adverse impacts to persons and property to the lammdlaU vldnsty of the subject site, and would not be in the Dest interests of the health, safety and wNfare of the c1L1zMS of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as folios: (i) Severe site constraints 11Mt the development potential of this site. Speclficalty, th/s site cost shah access to peripheral streets with an adSaeant apartmattt coetplaa. fits shared access reptlremant 11N is the site's potential to M buffand tram tM ad~aeent apartment cotaplex. The Application wtWld penes, land uses o/ greater intensity than under currMt General Plan dnlgMt/on. fierNon, this ApplfeaLton has the potential to tncreua land use lncompat1D111ty of this site with the aQ)acent residential use, and this 1s contrary to the objectives of the Land Use Eteamnt of the General plan, (it) Nith the approval of this apPiteation, the project site would be suD~ected to land uses of grater intensity that would expose adlacenL residents to greater amounts of noise, ob~atttonable odors, light/Glare. track traNlr 11~~~r •-~vw,~, nuiaenp TaCCer3. ThlSe conditions have the potential to result in stgnlflcant advene impacts to the people and property in the lnwedlKe vicinity of the pro~eet site, and therefore, would not be 1n the best interest of the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the City of Rancho Cucaaonga, (H9) Barad upon the suDStanLial evldenu presented to this Cometssion during the above-referenced public Aaaring and upon the specific findings of facts set /orth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Coswfssion Mreby finds and concludes that the application would not De consistent with the ob~actlvs of the Land Use El anent of tna General Plan to organln land uses to avoid creating nuisances aamng aglacent land uses would not De 1n the DesL interest of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, and would not protect the Malth, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga, California. (iv) In con,)unctlon with The Application, an Initial Study/Preliminary Environmental Assessment, in confonaity with the requirements with the California Environaental Quality Act, has been prepared; however, Commission has determined that this project could nave a significant adverse effect on the envtronaKnt, and hereby declines to make a finding of n0 significant Impact and to certl/y a Nagatlve Oeclaratlon. (vl Based upon the findings and conciustons set forth in pa ragrapns 1, 2 and 3 aDOVe, this Cotmn/ssion hereby recamstends denial of Tne Application and directs gnat a certified copy of this Resaluttan and related material De forwarded to the Ctty Council for final determination,. ~~7 PLANNING C(NMISSION RESOLt1TI0N N0. 33-Z~1 RE: GPA 88-OU Page 3 full The Deputy Secretary Lo Lh1s Goaetsston xhall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND AOOPTE6 THIS 27TH OAY OF JANUARY, 1988. PLANNING CORHISSiON OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON6A BY:~ C' a ry ~jJnNn /1 ATTEST: C.AGfMt/~--- TC ra u er, pu y re I, Brad Buller, Deputy SacreUry of the planning Ca~lsston of the C1ty of Rancho Cucaapnga, do herby certify that tM foregoing Resolution ws duiy and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted Dy the Planning Cost.ISSton of the C1ty of Rancho Cucnonga, at a,Tegular aieettng of tM Planning Ca~tsston held on the 27th day of Janwry, 1918, by the follorH ng voU-to-~At: AYES: COlM1ISSIONERS: CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMIISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: CgMISSI0NER5: BLAKESLEY ~(o g RESOLUTION N0. gg_p5 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING CgMISSION RECOMIIENDISK; DENIAL OF A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP, DDA 81-I1, FROM OFFICE/9ROFESSIONAi TO NEIGHBORFIOOD COMMERCIAL FOR A 3.45 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE' SOUTHNEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND HELLMAN AVENUE. RANCHO LUCA~NGA, CALi FORK/A, AND MAKE FiNDItiGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Reci tai s. (i) James E. Carter has filed an application for the Development Districts Amendment No. 87-11 as descrtbad in the tltie of this Resolution. Hereinafter 1n this Resolution, the suD,jact Development Districts Amendment request is referred to as The ApDHUtion. (11) On January 27, 1988, the Planning CDamMsslon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on The Application and concluded Bald hearing on that date. (111) A11 legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 8. Aesolution. unY Turavcro~ !t +- -c.`rf ~i,uuJ, Jeierwinea anu reS0l tlea Oy Lne Planning Camissian of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. based upon substantial ev/dence presented to this Camstssion during the above-referenced public hearing on January 27, 1988, inclu4ing written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Coamisslon hereby specifically finds as foilows: (el fie Appllcetlon applies to a 3.45 acre parcel of land Oasically rectangular 1n configuration, located on the southwest corner of Base Line Read and Hellman Avenue. Said property is currently designated as Office/professional on the peveloDment Distracts MaP and is substantially y,c,n. lard •- • •-- x p,. „r an existing access easement that Dlsetts the property in a north-south dlrect/on over which a two way driveway with central median is developed; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Residential (2-4 du/ac) on the Development Districts Map and consists of a church site and surrounding Single Family Residential, the property to the south c~ the subject site is designated Medium Residential (8- 14 du/ac) on the Development Districts Map and consists of a multi-family apartment complex, the property to the East 1s designated Office/Dro/essional on the Development Districts Map and consists of a Service Station and Office ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, od-=i RE: COA 87-11 January 27, 1988 Page 2 bu 11 d1 ngs, and the property td the west is designated Low Resi denttal (2-4 du /at) on the Oevel opment Districts Map and and consists of the pu6ltc Library and Lions Park; and (c) The applicatt on requests the Mendment of the Deve7 opment 01str1cts Map from Office/Professional to Neighborhood Commercial for the a.as acre pa rcei; and (d) The appN cation would not De consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan, could Dotentiaily result in significant adverse impacts to persons and property in the taeaediate vicinity of the sub,lect site, and would not be to the best lnteretts of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the Ctty of Rantho Cucamonga as follows: (11 Severo site constraints limit the development potential of this site. Specifically, this site must share access to peripheral streets witAln an ayacent apartment complex. This shared access requirement limits the site's potential to De buffered fro the ad,~acent aD+rtment. The gppi tcatlon would permit land uses of greater intensity than under current Developaent 0/strlcts designation. Therefore, this Appllcatlan has the potential to increase land use incoepat1b111ty o1 this site w/th the adiacent residential use, and'~this 1s contrary to the ob~ectlves of the Land Use Element of the General Plart. (ti) N1th the approval of this application, the protect site would be subjected to land uses of oreater intendr~ roar .,,,,n~ ,. __ a0.7acent residents to greater amounts of noise, objectionable odors, light/glare, truck traffic, ittty and other nuisance factors. These conditions have the potential to result in significant adverse impacts to the people and property in the immediate vicinity Of the project site, and therefore, would not De to the best interest of the health, safety, and welfare of the clt/zees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (111) Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Coasission hereby finds and concludes that the appl lcatlon would not be consistent with the oD,jectives of the land Use Element of the General P1 an to organize land uses to avoid creating nuisances among adjacent land uses would not De 1n the best Interest of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, and would not protect the health, safety, and welfare of the rite>.ns oa aarcho Cuca.~^^ya, Caltfornta. (1v) In con,{unctlon w/th The Application, an Initial Study/Preliminary Environmental Assessment, 1n conformity with the requirements wirh the Califarnta Environmental Quality Act, has been prepared; however, Commission has determined that this project could have a significant adverse effect on the environment, and hereby declines to make a finding of no significant impact and to certify a Negative Declaration. (vl Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, this CoamlSSian hereby recommends dental of the gppllcation and directs that a Certtiled copy of this Resolut!on and related '1'~ material De forwarded to the City Council far final determination. PLANNING COFMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 33-25 RE: DOA 87-11 January 21, 1488 Page 3 (vf) The Deputy Secretary to this Coss.isslon snap certify to the adoption of tots Resolution. APPROVED AND ADDPTEO THIS 27TH DAY OF JANUARY. 1988. PLANNING COlMISSION OF THE CITT OF RANCHO CUCAPKINGA BY: , , ATTEST: I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Cossdsslon o/ the C1ty of Rancho Cucastonga, do herby certify that tba foregoing Resolution ws duly and regularly Introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Cas:lsslon of the L1ty of RanMO Cucaaonga, at a nguLr stseting of tha Planning Cosstlaslon held on the 27th day at January, 1968, by the tollortng rots-to-~+1t: AYES: COIINISSIDNERS: CHITIEA, EMERILK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY unct~ r,rr.:~:'w-"~.•: nun! ABSENT: COMAISSIDNERS: gLAKESLEY ~~~ JAM64 CARTER DEVffi.OPMmV'f COMPANY 888 North Main Street, Suite 801 9anu Asa. Cal iforala 92701 (711) 543-9759 February 11, 1958 Mr. Dennis L. Stout, Mayor CS ty of Rancho Cucamonga Post Offiee Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, G 91730 Re: CPA 8803A - JAMES E. CARTER DDA 87-11 - JAMES E. CARTER Request Eor coneinuanca of public hearing of agenda ieem 117 tram February 17, 1958 to March 34. 1988 Denr Mr. Stouts 1 request that the public heazinq before the City Counsel regarding the above applieationa to amend the general Dlen and development district maD be continued until March 16, 1988. As 1 ~~'~~=~~='"~ -- =~~ ~-~~Y~.vuw, wa a[e wOr![1Rg CO reaOlVe some 'Of the problems raised by 'the P1aRning Staff and Commission in connection with these project. Thank you. Yours very trul , ~~C~ ES E. CARTER acq a ~~ RESOLUTION N0. $8'0Q~, A RESOLUTION OF THE RAlILHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL DENYING A REQUEST TO AMEND THE OEVELODMENT DISTRICTS MAP, DDA 81- 11, FROM OFFICE/PROFESSIONAL TO NEIGIIBORN000 COMMERCIAL fOR A 3.45 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE SOUTHMEST CORNER OF BASE 'LINE ROAD AND HELLMAN AVENUE, FUWCHO CUCAIgNOA, CALIFQRHIA, AND MAKE FIHCINOS IN SUPPGRT THEREi~F - AGN: 208-202--13, 14. A. Rentals. Districts(iAeendment No.C81t11 assdescribed lnptheattttefof thisDResolutlon. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Districts Amendment request is referred to as fie Appllcatlon. (i1) On January 27, 1988, the planning Comiaisslon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duty noticed public hearing on fie Appllcatlon, and Issued Resolution Mo. 88-25 rccoatmending to this L1ty Council that said application be dented. (111) On February 1T, 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hear/ng on that date. :,.., ... •• ~~~ ~=50~ v~~•~w~~~ies w cne aeopcton or Lnts Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOM, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, detertstned an6 resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: forth to the Recltals,~ ParthA,YO% th/siResolutlonnarcttrueaand correcLacts set 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced pubiic hearing an February 17, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: basically rectangularhio conflgurattoaDllacatedaon theasouthwestlcornernof Base Lfne Road and Hellman Avenue. Said property is Currently designated as Office/Professional on the Development Districts Map and 1s substantially vacant land except for an existing access easement that bisects the property fn a north-south direction over which a two way driveway with central median is developed; and ~ 73 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. RE: DDA 87-I1 February 17, 1988 Page 2 (bl fie DroPerty to the north of the subtect site is designated Low Residential (2-4 du/acl on the Development Distracts Map and consists of a church site and surrounding Single Family Residential, the property to the south of the subtect site 1s designated Medium Residential (8- 14 du/ac) on the Oevelopnent Districts Map and consl5ts of a aAJiti-fanny apartment complex, the property to the East is designated Office/Professional are the Developaent Districts Nap and consists of a Service Station and Office buildings, and the property to the west is designated Low Residential (2-4 du/ac) on the Development Districts Map and and consists of the public iibrary and Lions Park; and (c) The Application requests the Amendment of the Development 0lstricts Map from Office/professional to Neighborhood Comaercial for the 3.45 acre parcel; and (d) The Application would not be consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Pt an, could potentially result in significant adverse tngacts to persons and property 1n the immediate vicinity of the subtect site, and would not be in the best Interests of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: (i) Severe site constraints limit the development potential of this site. Specifically, this Site must share access to peripheral streets within an adtacent apartment complex. This shared access requirement limits the site's potential to be buffered from the ayacent apartment. The Application would penait land uses of greater intensity than unaer current Development Districts designation. Therefore, this Application has the potential to Increase land use incompatlblltty of this site with the adtacent residential use, and this is contrary to the obtectlves of the Land Use Element of the General Plan. (ii) Ntth the approval of this application, the protect site would be subtected to land uses of greater Sntensity that would expose a dt scent residents to greater amounts of not se, obtecti onable odors, light/glare, truck traffic, litter and other nuisance factors. These coed/Lions have the potential to result to significant adverse impacts to the people and properay 1n the immediate vlctnity of the protect site, and therefore, would mat be to the best interest of the health, safety, and welfare of Me citizens of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ~, Based upon the substartttal evidence aresented to this r,ouncfl gun ng the above-referenced public hearing and upon the speclHC findings of facts set forth 1n paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes that the application would not be consistent with the obtectives of the Land Use Element of the General Plan to organize land uses to avoid creating nuisances among adtacent land uses and would not protect the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga, California. a~~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. RE: ODA 81-11 February 17, 1988 Page 3 4. In con,~unttion with The Application, an Initial Study/ Preliminary Environental Assessment, in conforwlty with the requirements with the California Environmental Quality Act, has been prepared; however, Gpuncii has determined that this project could have a significant adverse effect on the environment, and hereby declines to make a finding of no significant impact and to certify a Negative Detlaratlon. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, this Council hereby resolves that pursuant to section 65853 to 65857 of the California Goverment Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby denies on the 17th day of February, 1988, Development District Amendment No. 8)-11. ~~ RESOWTION N0. 88"OQ3 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL DENYING A AEpUEST TO AMEND THE LAND USE MAP OF THE GENERAL PLAN, GPA 88.O1A, FROM OFFICE TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FOR 3.45 ACRES Of LAND LOCATED ON THE SWTMNEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AN6 NELLMAN AYENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 20&202x1:, 14. A. Rest tats. (t) Janes E. Carter has filed an application for the General Plan Amendaent No. 88.O1A as described to the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter 1n this Resolution, the sub,)ect General Plan Anendnent re4Uest is referred to as The Application. (11) On January 27, 1988, the Planning Caaaoisslon of the City of Rancho Cucaawnga conducted a duly noticed public Rearing on The Application, and issued Resolution No. 88-26 recoasaending to this City Council that said application be denied. (11) On February 17, 1988, the City Council of Ranchq Cucanonga conducted a duly noticed puD17c hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iv) A11 legal prereQulsltes to the adoption of this Resolution have B. Resolution. NOM, THEREFORE, Tt is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows; 1. This Council hsreDy speclHcally Hnds that all of the facts set forth 1n the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence Oresented to this Council during the above-re/erenced public hearing on February 11, 1988, lneluding written and oral staf/ reports, together with public testlagny, this Council hereby specifically f/nds as follows: (a) ine Application applies to a 3.45 acre parcel of land basically rectangular 1n configuration, located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Hellamn Avenue. Said property is currently designated as Office on the Land Use Map of the General Plan and Is substant1a11y vacant land except for an existing access easement that bisects the property in a north-south direction over which a two way driveway with central median 1s developed; and ~ 7b PLAN NI 4G CGMMISSiON RESOLUTION N0. RE: GPA 88-OlA February ll, 1988 Page 2 designated Low(Restdentialo(2r4ydu/ac)eoe the LandhUseuMepcofsGeneral Map and consists of a church site and surrounding Single Fao11y Resident/ai, the property to the south of the subject site is designated Medtu~ Residential (8- 14 du/ac) on the Land Use Map of the General Pian and consists of a aultt- family apartment coablex, the property to the East L designated Off!ce ar. the Land Use Map of the General Plan and consists of a Service Station and Office buildings, and the property to the west is designated C1v1c/Canmunity and Park on the Land Use Map of the General Plan and consists of the public library and Lions Park; and (cl The Application requests the Mendment of the Land Use Map of the General Ptan fray Office to Melghborhood Caaweroial for the 3.45 acre parcel; and (d) The Application would not be consistent with the Land Use Eleaw!nt of the General Plan, could potentlalty result 1n s1gn1flunt adverse impacts to persons and property in the iaredlate vicinity of the subjec4 site, and mould not be in the Dest interests of the health, salary and welfare of the citizens of the City of Rancho Cucaagnga as follows: (1) Scverc site constraints limit the developalent potential of this site. Specifically, this site oust store access to peripheral streets with an adjacent apartment coaglex. This shared access requirement limits the site's potential to be buffered from the ayacent do lrlmpM ~nr.lw 1A• •wwlln.N .. ~~ ~,. ••rr• •--••-•• ~ .. ys. ~., oPw vidi vi yrel i.er intensity than under current General P1 an designation. Therefore, this ADPiicatTon has the potential to increase land use lncompatibtitty of this site with the adjacent residential use, and this Ts contrary to the objectives of the Land Use Element of the General Plan. iii) with the approval of Lh1s appttcatlon, the project site would be subjected to land uses of greater intensity that would expose adjacent residents to greater amounts of noise, objectlonaDle odors, light/glare, truck trsffic, litter and other nuisance factors. These conditions have the potential to result 1n stgnlflunt adverse impacts to the people and property in the lawedlate v1c1n/ty of the project site, and therefore, would not be 1n the best interest of the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Sa:Ed Upon Lh2 SiiD'aLai~it ai evidence presenced to this GOUOCII during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the speclfie findings of facts set forth 1n paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes that the appllcattan would not be consistent with the objectives of the Land Use Element of the General Plan to organize sand uses to avoid creating nuisances among adjacent land uses and would not protect the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga, Callfornta. ~/ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. RE: GPA 88-OlA February 17, 1988 Page 3 4. In cor~unctian with The Application, an Initial StuQy/Prel Linary Envl ronmental Assessment, 1n conforwi ty with the requirements witA the tallfornta Envtronmental Quality Act, has Deen prepared; however, Council has detenained that thts Dro,{ect could have a significant adverse effect on the environment, and hereby declines to mnka a finding of no significant impact and to certify a Negative Oeclaratlon. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs i, 2 and 3 above, this Council hereby resolves that pursuant to Section 65350 to 65362 of the California 6avernment Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby dent es on the 17th day of February, 1988, General Plan Amendment No. 88-OU. ~' / O connr,u~c o ~;ai~ss RESOLUTION N0. 88-092 A RESOLDTION OF TN8 CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A RP40EST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPI~NT DISTRICTS MAP DDA E7-11, PROM OPPI CE/ PROFESSIONAL TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMt1eRCIAL FOR A 3.45 ACRH PARCEL LOCATED ON TH8 SOUTHWEST CORNER OP BASE LINE ROAD AND HHLLMAN AVENOH, RANCHO QI CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 208-202-13, 14 A. Recitals. (i) Jemee H. Carter het filed an application for the Devel opmenc Diet ricte Amendment No. 87-11 ae described in the ci ile of this Reeoluti an. xereinef xer in this Reeolut ion, the eubj act Development Di etricte Amendment request ie referred to an The Appl icntion. (ii) On January 27, 1988, the Planning Commineion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noti cad public hesring on The Application, end issued Reeolut ion No. 88-25 recommending to this City Council that said application be denied. (iii) Cn February i7, 1988, the City Councii of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded etid hearing on that date. occurred. (iv) All Legsl prerequi sites to the adoption of this Re a~lution have B. Reeolut ion. NOW, THEREFORE, YT IS HERBBY FOUND, DBTERMINED ANb RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follova: 1. This Council hereby spa cifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Racitel a, Part A. of thin Resolution are true snd correct. 2. eased upon eubat anti al evidence presented to ehia Council during the above-referenced public huring on Pabrwty 17, 1988, including vritten and oral atefP reports, together with public teatimo~ry, this Cowcil hereby ,__xf xcel ly finds ss fsllovs. (a) The Application nppliaa to a 3.45 acre parcel of Isnd beeicslly rectangul er in configuration, located on the toutbvaat corner of Baae Lisa Road end Hallman Avmnw. Said property is currmntly daeignatad as office/Profauional on the Dwalopmant DiaCricL Nap red is aubatantially vacant land except for an aziating actan ascent that biuct^ the property in a`~~ Resolution No. g8-092 Page 2 a north-south direction war which a two way drivway with central median is developed; and (b) The property to the north of the eubj act site ie designated Lw Reeidenti ai (2'4 du/ac) on the Development Met ride Map and coneiets of a church Bite and surrounding Single Pamily Residential, [he property to the south of the eubj act nits i¢ desig•iated Medium Residential (B14 du /w c) en the Dwel opment Matricte Map and conei ate of a multi-family apartment compl ez, the property eo the East ie designated Office/Proteesiannl on the Dwelopment Districts Map and coneiets of a Service Steti on and Office buildivge, and the property to the west ie designated Lw Aeeidentinl (2-4 du/ec) on the Develop- ment Di stricte Map sad and conei ate of the public library and Lions Perk; and (c) The Application req oasis the Amendment of the Devel opmeat Di etricta Map from Office/Professional to Neighborhood Commercial for the 3.45 acre parcel; and (d) The Application would not ba consistent with the Lsnd Uea Element of the General Plen, could potentially result in eignificavt adverse impacts to parsons and property in the immediate vicinity of th¢ eubj act site, and would not be is the beat interests of the heal ih, safety and rel _°are of the citizens of the City of Anacbo Cucmonga sa follwa: (i) u¢ware cite conat rnivte limit the dw¢lopment po[eatial of this site. Specifically, thin site moat ehsra ecoeaa to peripheral streets within an adj acen[ apartment compl e:. Tbia shared acceu raquirsant limits the site's ootavtial to bw huff..•n a.... .+.• •aj ;^^... . - ~.... ...c %wr:..• tior. would permit land aces of greater intensity than order current Dwelopmeat Oi etri cte deeignati on. Therefore, this Appl icetioa hen th¢ potential to increase lend use incompatibility of this site with the adj acen[ reeideneral use, avd this ie contrary to the obj ectivea of the Land Uee E1®eat of the General Plan. (ii) With the epprwnl of Chia application, the project site woW.d be subjected to land ua¢a of greater intensity that could azpoaa adj ecenC res ideate to granter ameunta of aoi aa, obj actionable odors, light/ glare, truck traffic, litter and other nuisance fecton. Thane conditions have the potential to result is eignifimnt adverse impact^ to the people and property in the immediate vicinity of the project site, sad therefore, would not be in the beat ia[ereat of the health, safety, and welfare of the cilia eve of the City of Rancho Cucaaongs. 3. Resod upon [ha aubatantial ev ideate presented to thin Cowcil during the ebwe-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facto set forth in paragraphs 1 And 2 above, this Couweil hereby finds sad concludes that the applicati oa would not be cond sleet with the obj wtivu of [he Lend Usa Hleaaat of the Cewral Plsn to organise land uau to avoid creating nuiaaace^ uang adj aceae lead uu^ sad would not protest the heel eh, safety, sad oral fare of the citiz aaa of Rancho Cucaaonga. Cpl itornia. ~~ R A Resci ut ion :io. 88-092 Page 3 4. In conj cacti on rith The Application, an Initial Study/Preliminary Environmental As sesement, in conformity rith the req ui remente with the California Environmental quality Act, has been prepared; however, Council has determined that this project could have a significant adverse effect on the ewironment, and hereby declines to make a finding of no significant impact and to certify a Negative Declareti on. 5. Based uDOn the findinae and concl uai one aer forth i psrsgrsphs 1, 2 and 3 above, this Council hereby resolves that pursuant ie section 65853 to 65857 of the Cal ifornin Government Code, that the City Council of the Ci iy of Rancho Cucamonga hereby denies on the 17th day of Pebruery, 1988, Development Di at rict Amendment No. 87-11. a'/~ covr.v(,eo rc 5iaiss RESOLUTION N0. 88-093 A P,ESOLDTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE QTY OP RANCHO W CAMONGA, GLIPORNIA, DENYING A AHIUEST TO AMEND THE LAND USE MAP 02 TR6 GENERAL PLAN, GPA 88-O1 A, FROM OPFI C6 TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL POR 3.45 ACRES OP LAND LOCATED ON THE SWTHNEST WRNER OF BASS LINE ROAD AND HELLMAN ApENUE, RAi:CRG wCAPGNGA, CAi.ieGRNIA, AND MAKE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 208-202-13, 14. A. Recitals. (i) Sanee E. Carter hea filed an application for the General Plan Amendment No. 88-OlA ae des ctibed is the title of thin Aesolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment request ie referred to ae The Application. (ii) On Senwty 27, 1988, the Planning Comiatioa of the City of Rencha Cucamonga emducted s dulq noticed public hearing on The Application. and isewd Resolution No. 88-24 recommending to this City Cowcil that said appl ica[i on be denied. (11) Cn Pebrwry 17, 1988, [he City Co.:acil of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the eppl icstion and concluded said hearing on chat data. l tvl All legal prerequi sites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Reeclut ion. N0:1. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY POUND, DETERHINED AND RESCL4ED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamomga ea follmrs: 1. Tbis Cowcil hanby spaeifical ly finds the[ ell of the facto set for Ch in the Recital, Pnrt A, of this Resolution are trw and correct. 2. Beeed upon substantial evidanca presenud to thin Cowcil during the above-referenced public hanring oa Febrwry 17, 1988, including grit ten and oral etafE reports, together rith public teetimo:ry, thin Council hereby speci- fically finds ss fol loves (e) The Application applies to • 3.45 acre pa real of land baeicel ly rectangular is configuration, located on the sauthrast corner of Base Line Road end Hellman Avanw. Said propsrtp i• curraotly designated as Office on the Lsnd Usa Nap of the Gaaatal Plan and is substantial ly vacant land ezcapt for an azirting sccu^ euuant that bi nci^ the props rty in • north-tooth di caction over rhic6 a taro ray drivsrtq pith central udian is davalopad; sad a, ~D Resolution No. 88-093 Page 2 (b) The property to the north of the eubj act site ie designated Low Residential (2-4 du/ac) on the Land Uee Map of General Map and conei ate of e church site end eucromding Single Pemily Residential. the pzoperry to the south of the eubj act site is designated Medim Residential (8-14 du/ac) oa the Lana Use Map of the General Plan and conei sae of a multifamily apartment complez, the property to the Eaat is designated Office on the Land Use Map of the General Plan and consists of a Service Station sad Office boil dings, and the property to the vest is designated Civic/Community end Park om the Land Use Map of the Gene rel Plen fled consiate of the public library and Lions Pa rlc; and (c) The Application requests the Amendment of the Land Uee Hap of the General Play from Office to Neighborhood Commercial for the 3.45 acre parcel; end (d) The Application would not be consistent with the Land Uee Elemenx of the General PLea, could potentially result in eignificent adverse impacts to peraone and property in the immediate vicinity of the eubj set site, end would not be in the beet interest• of the health, safety sad welfare of the citizens of the City of Rancho Cucamonga am follwa: (i) Severe site conetzaint• limit the development potential of this Bite. Specifically, this aiia mums ahara nccee• to peripheral streets with as edj scent apartment complex. This shared access requirsent limits the sit e'a potential to be bnffezed frcm the edj aceat apartment complex. The Application would psait land uses of greater iatanaitp than under cuttent General Plen deaigmtion, Thstafore, th ie Application hem the potential to increase lend use incompetihilit9 of this site with the •diaceat reai derv: al vas, and this ie contrary to the obj ectivea of the Lead Usa Element of the General Plan. (ii) With the approval of this application, the project site rouid be subjected to land uses of greater intensity that would ezpoae edj scent reai dente to greeter amounts of noise, obj actiom6le odors, light/ glare, truck traffic, litter ewd other nciunce fact ore. These conditions have the potential to result in significant adverse impacts to the people and property in the immediate vicinity of the project Bite, and therefore, would not be in the beat interest of the health, safety, end welfare of the citiz sae of the City of Rancho Cucuonga. 3. Eued upon the eubatantial evidence praunUd io this Council during the abovo-referenced public heeriag and upon the spa cific findings of facto set forth to oa ragrapha 1 and 3 ebw. e, this Cevaci/ he:ems finds sad concluaee that the application would not ba conei atant with the obj accivaa of the Land Uee Element of the General Plan to organise land uaaa to avoid cresting nuieenca• aaoag edj scant land uaaa and rouid not protect the health, safety, end welfare of the ci tizana of Rancho Cucuonga, California. 4. In caaj motion rich The Application, an Initial Study/Preliminary Enviromantal Aauawant, in comfor~ity with the raq ui ra•anu with the Glifornie Em,iromantal Quality Act, has bean prapand; hwavar, Comcil has deterniaad that thin proj ac[ could Lave • significant edverw of fact om the f~~ ~D Resolution No. 88-093 Page 3 em izonment, and hereby declines [o make a finding of no significant impact end to certify a Negative Declareti on. S. Based upon the findings aad concluaiuns set forth in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 nbwe, this Council hereby resolves that pursuant to Section 65350 to 65362 of the California Gwenrment Code, that the City Council of the Ciiy of Rancho Cucamonga hereby denies on the 17th day of February, 1988, General P1 an Am enMent No. RR-01 A. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTHD this 17th day of Pebruary, 1988. AYES: Brown, Buq uet, Si out, Uright, Eing NOES: None ABSENT: None L. Stout, ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelei, City Clerk I, BEVERLY A. AlITNELET, CITY CLERR of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cal ifozni a, do hereby certify that [he foregoing Reeoluti on was duly pas aad, epprwed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, et a regal er meeting of said City Council held on the 17th day of Pebruary, 1988. Executed [hie 18th day of Pebruary, 1988 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk ~ ~D a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 4, 1988 ~ T0: Chairman and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT amen n o ap er Bevel o ge ve opmen Code modifying certain opment re ulatlons for Low-Medi R i wi es dential. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA CQMUNITY PLAN o e c or a n °~" develo 9 Y an ex ifytng certain pment re ulations for law-Medium d an Medium Residential. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN o e errs s ommun amen n development regulations for aL~e~ ~difa d c n Medium Residential. I. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of the ree a ace Ordinances amending certain development standards for small lot development within the City. II, ANALYSIS: The attached Planning Commission staff report fully escr es the proposed amendments. The Planning Commission's deliberations focused upon three minor language changes which are reflected in the attached Ordinances for both Victoria and Terra Vista: 1. The Commission clarified that center plat product would be allowed on lots with a minimum of 3,500 square feet, averaging 4,000 square feet, orovided it is an. i.^.nerativ¢ design. ;acfl ac tha "•-ide-shallow" concepts being developed within both planned conmunities. 2, Previously approved Tentative Tract Maps would be "grandfathered and would not be scb,~ect to the new standards. ~~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: DCA 88-03, VCPA 88-03, TVCPA 88-02 May 4, 1988 Page 2 3. The stdeyard setbacks were revised to require 5 feet nt7niapan on one side, with the total of both sideyard setbacks to 6e at least 15 feet. This is intended to al tow design flexibility in the total of 15 feet of setback, rather than requiring sideyard setbacks of 5 feet on one side and 10 feet on the ooDOSite side. R ly suMaltted ~~ Brad oiler City Planner BB:DC:ko Attache~ents: April 13, 1988 Planning Coawisslon Staff Report and Minutes Resolution No. 88-69 Ordinance NnenANent Develop~aent Code Resolution No. 88-65 Ordlna~rce Amanding Victoria Ca®unity Plan Resolution No. 88-66 Ordinance Amen6eent Terra Vista Coawunlty Plan ~8~ PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 13, 1988 P. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 88-03 - CITY OF .. - ame oleo ail er o eve oilmen o e mo y ng cer n development regulations for Low-Mediuo Residenttal. p. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 88-02 - - n amen n e erra s a ommun an x mo t y ng cer n evelopnent regulations for Low-Medium and Medilan Residenttal. R. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSNENi AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 88-03 - - amen men c r a omnun y an x m y ng cer n evelopment regulations for Low-Medium and Medium Residential. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Emerick questioned if staff had reviewed the new received from The NTlliam Lyon Company in regards to previously approved tracts being exempt. Dan Colman stated that staff had reviewed it with the Lity Attorney. Ne stated that when you have an alreagy approved tentative neap, that nap remains valid and the City must approve a final wp consistent with the tentative mao. iiiererore the cnanges to IoL sties woula not affect any approved tentative map. However, the setback requirements and other development standards would have an effect on any subsequent design review appiication, which is the point being made by The William Lyon Company. Ne stated that is yet to be seen because staff does not have specific product to review. Vice-Chairman Chi ti ea noted that the result may be that The William Lyon Company may have a valid tract map, but that they night not be able to build on the lots created 6y the map, Dan Coleman stated Lhat is correct. Ne stated that the Ordinance, as written, does not exempt previously approved tracts. Vice-Chairman Chi ti ea questioned that if the Commission decided Lo exempt previously apareved ma os, what would he the prgga4Lirp. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES PAGE I APRIL 13, 1988 Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that the Commission could approve the ordinance as is and the developer would have to come for a variance, or that the tract map could be amended, or staff could wrtte a provision in the ordinance eXempti ng tracts approved prior to the effective date. Comsi ssioner Emerick questioned if staff had reviewed Item No. 2 in the memo from The Nilitam Lyon Company. Dan Coleman stated that staff had. Ne indicated that The Nilliam Lyon Company is stating that they have no objection to Lhe minimum lot width proposed, but they do object to the 5,000 minimum%5,500 average. He stated that Lyon feels they can design a center plot single family detached home on a lot down to 3,000 square feet and stilt address the innovation and design quality concerns of the Commission, such as the 'wide-shallow' concept. He stated that the "wide-shallow" concept would be an innovative concept which would be a 3,500 minimum lot area/4,000 average, which still makes a dtfferente of 500 square feet. Vice-Chairman Chi ti ea opened the public hearing. Steven Ford, representing The Nilliam Lyon Company, stated that on Item No. 1, they are developing many of thair projects as a custom lot subdivision, they sell these to other builders. He stated that this could have a severe business and economic impact because many of the builders have purchased and many have closed escrow on those lots based on the approved product exhibit. He stated that the impact that could happen is that the side yard setback requirements in the new ordinance are greater than those approved on those products and it cou16 affect their ability to develop a product that could meet their goals because they would now have to be creating a narrower width house. He stated that it would be somewhat in conflict with the coals of the City to create a very strong architecture statement at the front of each house. He stated that Tn regards to the center plot, if the innovative product standards would allow for center plot houses, that does address his concern. Dan Coleman stated that in the past, the Commission has deemed the center plot, wide-shallow" product to be a form of innovation. The Commission concurred. Commissioner TolsLoy stated that he felt the Commission needs to encourage developers to da innovative projects. Brad Buller stated that for future references, maybe the top sec ii on should be ti tied "typical canter plot predict" to which there i; the innovative center plot and a typical center plot. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES PAGE 2 APRIL 13, 1988 a&~ Dan Coleman stated that there is a problem trying to list every type of innovative product because tf it is innovative, you cannot think of all the possibilities that will exist. Vice-Chairman stated that maybe the typical center plot should be added. Steven Ford stated that if something could be added that clearly identifies that there is an opportunity for center plot products. Dan Coleman stated that maybe a "wide-shallow' concept could be illustrated and label it an innovative produci and in that way, it would be very clear. Steven Ford stated that would address his concerns in regards to the center plot product. He stated that in regards to the 15-foot sideyard setback on center plot products, their suggestion is that the Commission might want to consider having a total of 15 feet of sideyard setback required with one of them no less than S feet, but not restricted to a 5 foot and ID foot. He stated the reason for this was to allow some flexibility t0 a builder in the plotting of center plot houses on their 1~Mlvidual lots. CaawTssioner Emerlck questioned how marry tracts The Nil Ham Lyon Company has that have been sold. Steven Ford stated that they had 7 or 8. Jfm Bailey, The Nillfam Lyon Company, stated that this would be a very difficult situaLlon in regards to the projects that they have sold to other builders. He stated that would really appreciate the Commission work with them on the ones that have already been approved and not encumber those with the new setback requirements. Commissioner Emerick questioned if all the tracts have been sold. Jim Bailey stated that they have 6 sales right now and out of those 6, 3 have closed escrow. He stated this would be a hardship. Vice-Chairman Chltiea closed the public hearing. Brad Butler stated that he spoke to John Melcher of Lewis Homes, and he would support a continuance if the Commission decided to do so. Mr. Melcher stated that they would like to evaluate what has been approved to date and how it would affect their protects that have been approved. Vice-Chairman Chi ti ea stated that in the past the Commission has been willing to work with the devolep?rs on prejec*_s that have beer. approved. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES PAGE 3 APRIL 13, 1988 a~S Commissioner TolStoy stated that the Commission has discussed this before. Ne stated that the Commission's comments have been heard by staff, staff has written the changes, which he stated he agreed with. He stated that the Commission should exempt any previously approved tract map. Ne stated that he also supported the suggestion regarding the innovative product option. Commissioner Blakesley stated ha supported all the comments. Yice-Chairman Chi ti ea questioned what the Commission thought about Lhe flexibility on the sideyard setback. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he agreed with that. Me stated that the whole idea is to get the feeling of space and that the Commission needs to be flexible with the developer community. Yice-Chairmwn Chitiea agreed. Commissioner Ta7stoy stated that the Commission can adjust this in design review Sf it 1s not working. Vice-Chairmwn CM ttea stated that the flexibility suggestion that was invade by Steven Ford would be appropriate and to allow the exemrytion for the already approved projects. Ralph Nanson, Deputy City Attorney, stated that the ordinance should contain provisions stating these changes would not pertain to those subdivisions where a tentative map was approved prior to the effecttve date of the ordinance, providing that no material amendments to such previously approved tentative maps. Brad Buller stated that staff would take this direction as policy, and any new tract nwp in for processing would be considered under the new standards. Commissioner Blakesley moved to approve Development Code Amw:ndment 88-03 as modified. Commissioner Tolstoy seconded the motion. The motian carried by *.he following vote: AYES: COMMISSIGNERS: BLAKESLEY, ToLSTOY, CHITIEA, EMERICK NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL + + + + + + PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES PAGE 4 --carried APRIL 13, 1988 ab~ Commissioner Blakesley moved to approve Terra Yista Community Plan Amendment 88-02. Comaissioner Tolstoy seconded the motion. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BIAKESLEY, TOLSTOY, CHITIEA, EMERICK NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL +a,: ;.:t --carried Commissioner Tolstoy moved to approve Victoria Community Plan Amendment 88-03 as modified. Commissioner Blakesley seconded the motion. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, BLAKESLEY, TOLSTOY, CHITIEA, EMERICK NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NCNIEL : w :: + : PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES PAGE 5 --carried APRIL 13, 1988 2-s CITY OF' RANCHO CUCAi~IO;dGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 13, 1988 ; ~ F, T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Comm ssi on r FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT cone AMENDMENT - - C - amen n o ap er o e eve opmen Code modifying certain development regulations for Low-Medium Residential. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN amen n o e c or a ammun y an ex mo ifying certain development regulations for Low-Medium and Medium Residential. ENYIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISA COMMUNITY PLAN a- o e erra s a ammun y an ex modifying certain development regulations for Low-Medium and Medium Residential. BACKGROUND: Durfng recent years, the City has seen an increase in ev oeT-ome^t of single family detached cuhdi victnn< 7n rho r w- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) District, particularly Tn the 6-8 dwelling units per acre density range. In reviewing these proposals, the Planning Commission has consistently raised concerns regarding neighborhood appearance, usable yard area, and design quality. The City Council has directed the Planning Commission to re-examine the Low-Medium optional standards, with emphasis on strengthening the development standards to address these critical issues. On September 17, 1986, the Director of Community Development presented to the City Council a slide presentation on the issue of minimum tat sizes and minimum dwelling unit sizes. Following that presentation, the Council accepted the BIA's offer to fund a study of housing and marketing conditions in relation to the lot `i-e. unit ^i• option oresented b'r staff to the Council. ThP study was commissioned~as a factual survey •to provide data for the Council to use in the decision making process. The primary objective of the study was to analyze what impact the proposed or any increase in lot size/unit size would have on the housing market in Rancho Cucamonga. The completed study was presented to the Commission and Council in November of 1987. The Commission received the study as a factual document and concluded no further staff analysis was necessary. ~~~ ITEMS P, Q, R PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GCA 88-03, VCPA 88-03, TVCPA 88-03 April 13, 1988 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. Development Code: On February 10, 1988, the Planning umm s~~sion revTed and considered options for development standards to address the critical concerns of small lot development. The Planning Commission directed staff to proceed with the necessary amendments based on Option 2 for both center plot and innovative product: CENTER PLOT (LON-MEDIUA OPTIONAL STANDARDS) OPTION 2 5,000 sq. ft. Minimum Lot Area 5,500 sq. ft. Average Lot Area 5/10 ft. Side Yard Minimua Setback 25 ft. Front Yard Average Setback 20 ft. Front Yard Minimum Setback 15 ft. Rear Yard 50 ft. Lot Mi ni>mum Width INNOVATIYE PRODUCT IW~-1'ICUIUrI U~IlUX%Y. JIflIIUN(Wf OPTYON 2 3,500 sq. ft. Minimum Lot Rrea 4,000 sq. ft. Average Lot Area 0/10 ft. Side Yard 20 ft, Front Yard 15 ft. Rear Yard 45 ft. Lot Minimum Width B. Planned Communities: Within the Terra Vista and Victoria anne ommun ies, a number of amenities are provided as a trade-off fpr Smaiicr iGti. The pidnnP.d en7munf iiac faatu_r> extensive trails systems and other~deslgn amenities which, in itself, fs a form of innovation the City encourages. Therefore, staff would recommend that innovation continue to be encouraged wt thin the planned communities by not Increasing setbacks and lot width, except for traditional center plot homes. The following standards are recommended; 2-~9 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OCA 88-03, VWA 88-03, TYCPA 88-03 April 13, 1988 Page 3 CENTER PLOT PRODUCT (LON-MEDIUM/MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL) 5,000 sq. ft. Minimum lot Area 5,500 sq. ft. Average Lot Area 5/10 ft. Side Yard Minimum Setback 25 ft. Front Yard Average Setback 20 ft. Front Yard Minimum Setback 15 ft. Rear Yard 50 ft. Let Minimum Nidth INNOVATIVE PRODUCT iLOW-MEDIUMMEDIUM RESIDENTIAL) 3,500 sq, ft. Minimum Lot Area 4,000 sq. ft. Average Lot Area 700 sq. ft. Private Open Space Minimum fie addition of a standard for private open space is necessary to ensure that adequate outdoor space is provided because of varying SiUe or rear yarn setnaCK Cenett10n5. Both Planned Community texts currently contain separate standards for "conventional" and "cluster" development. Conventional housing in Terra Vista includes single family detached center plot, zero tot line and single family attached units. Zero l04 line, "Z" lot line, and duplex/triplex style homes are innovative design techniques that should be distinguished from traditional center p]ot housing types. Staff recommends that "conventional" be renamed "center plot" and allow the other innovative forms of housing under cluster/ Innovative standards. Cluster housing generally means a project where the homes are clustered together on a stogie building site and usually around a common open space system. This 1s an innovative site planning concept which is one form of a ""rianned Unit Oeveiopment" or PUD. Staff recommends that the cluster development standards be expanded to include other types of innovative housing previously mentioned. ~ Ga PLANNING COMMISSION STAfF REPORT DCA 88-03, YCPA 88-03, TVCPA 88-03 April 13, 1988 Page 4 The Medium Residential land u;e designation in both Victoria and Terra Vista Community Plans has a density range of 4 to 14 dwelling units per acre. This followed the Medium density range of the City's original General Plan. However, the City has amended tts General Plan to eliminate the overlap of density that formerly existed between the Low-Medium (4-8 dwelling arils per acre] and Medium ,4-14 dwelling units per acre) by changing the density range of the Medium Residential land use Lo 8 to 14 dwelling units per acre. Staff would recommend that the same change be made for Victoria and Terra VT sta for the same reasons. iIt. RECOIMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission con uc a pu lic hearings. If the Ordinances are acceptable as drafted, then adoption of the attached Resolutions recommending approval to the City Council mould be aDDreDriate. If there are arty necessary modifications to the Ordinances, staff should be directed to make the changes and bring the revtslons back to the Planning Coamiission. Brad Buller;' vi sy iianger BB:DC:te Attachments: Resolutions Ordinances a~i RESOLUTION N0. 88-69 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COM14AISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOP4AENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE A71EyOME:r'i N0. 08-03, d74ENDiNG SECTION i7.Dc.D4C PERTA'aliiG DEYELDRidENT Si ANGwi"u5 FuR THE LuW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL ~DISTP.ICT WHEREAS, on the 13th day of April, 1988, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65864 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this protect wi11 not create a significant adverse effect on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on April 13, 1988. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVER: 1. That Dursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt the attached Ordinance amending Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. 2. That a certified copy of this Resolutfon and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Counctl. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 137H DAY OF APRIL, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF TH~CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA /) ~6~i: /rte ATTEST: I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolutfon was duty and regularly Introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of Apr11, 1988, by the fa11ow1ng vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, TOLSTOY, EMERICK, CHiTIEA NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL ~ / ~- ORDINANCE N0. i' yS AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENgAENT N0. 88-03, AMENDING SECTION 17.08.040 PERTAINING TO DEYELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 13th day of April, 1988, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65864 of the California Government Code and recommended to the City Council adoption of Development Code Amendment No. 88-03; and / WHEREAS, on the ~ ~ day of N \Q.t.I 1988, the City Council held a duly advertised public'h'ea~r ng pursue-tn'-{o~$ec~{on 65864 of the California Government Code to consider Development Code Paendment No. 88-03. SECTION 1: Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Cade is hereby amended by adding Table 17.08.040-B and Table 17.08.040-C as attached hereto and incorporated by reference. SECTION 2: Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding Table 17.08.040-CI and Table 17.08.040-C2 as attached hereto and incorporated by reference. SECTION 3: This Council hereby finds and certifies that the protect has been reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and hereby concurs with the Negative Declaration posted with respect to the protect. SECTION 4: The provisions of this Ordinance No, s shall not apply to those residential subdivisions wherein a Tentative p has been approved prior to the effective date of this Ordinance; provided na material amendments or extensions are made to such previously approved Tentative Maps. For the purpose of calculating those provisions which are the subtect of this Ordinance, those standards effective as at the time of appro~:a1 of such Tentative Moos cha11 annly The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Dail Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of n ar o, a ifornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. a 93 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 88-03 Page 2 The following tables supplement those standards set forth in the previous tables, for development of a Low-Medium Residential product. TABLE 17.08.010-C1 LQI~IIDIUN CEMiFR PLOI PRODUCT OPTIOkUJ. DEYELOPI~If SIAIOAR05 Lot Area: Minimum Net Average 5,500 Minimum Net 5,000 Lot Dimensions: Minimum width 50 (at requred front setback) Setbacks: Front Yard P.verage 25 Front Yard Minimum 20 Interior Side Yard 5/10 Rear Yard 15 Protects may also be filed under the Low-Medium Innovative Product Optional Development Standards provided they meet the following obtectives for innovation: 1. Provide high design quality throughout the protect; and 2. Provide creative design solutions which address the critical concerns of neighborhood compatibility, density transition, and design quality; and 3. Promote an attractive streetscape and discourage monotonous streets dominated by asphalt/concrete, garages, and cars; and 4. Create well-designed space, particularly usable yard space. 295 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENdiENT 88-03 Page 3 TABLE 17.OB.OW-C2 Lpf.1EDIUM INIIDYATIVE PROpICT OPTIONAL DEVEI.OPMEIIT STAIDARDS LoL Area: Minimum Net Average 4,000 Minimum Net 3,500 Lot Di~ensians: Mlnimwa N1dth Q5 (at required front setbackl Setbacks: Front Yard Minimuq 20 Interior Side Yard 0/10 Rear Yard 15 a ~s Section 1'1.08.040 B. Basic Development Standards. The following table, Table 17.08.040-B sets forth minimum development standards for residential development projects tiled up to the mid-point of the permitted density range. TABLE 17.08.00-8 BASIC DBVBLO[lID;NT STANDASOB M/H~Not YlWine) VL ii,5~5~ ;6`~ LY a MR jlh e~~ir. , /~ ' w u a wS Lot Awv '~"~ f ; g lM1nimum Vet .irenQe 25,500 e,ogo y/R Niminum Net 20,000 3,000 N(R p ~`' RonOa d DMWR Wtib lD to ~E 0y W UP ro "~ i (Dermabe PV !aril : 0 to %'1'Tw+ aWmun D+<WIIR Onlt fIa 'yq^„„z Sitgte femHy deteetvat V~„ OWlWnOe arty I.IPPeRflO I,P1RIOflO a"'s1~ la Mmwlele Mm:mum WiON 90erR. OROq. R/R d rpwrM frmlt vvy!]0 ~>K letGeNl Nin. rornr, lot +fOm too s 30 N/R Minimum OptM1 !30 OP y N/R ^ Sllmmum lrontge so r, / ~Ui 50 N/A 10 front WOpeRY lin<I e71; s"y ;y Nln. NR lot (ronteRe ]0 xim ~fl~ 10 N/A la front pwlxrtY Ilnel ia, ~, y,,?iay„ ~t0.donN d ~.yn . Front Y..Ue.e I2avb ;'-; i2ev3. ^ N/R '~ 3 very s 3 ~ vvY a ,,~, s§,,'ter4t~. 6 r. corer. Stit Yve Y ~'' x] /.~ +,, p?} : N/R "~ Interior Slee YsrO t0/li Y1a Sn0 y + Y ~'S60!*^`?s N/R ~' rev sera dD ; l5 ~'/'~ " N/A wa at mter:or ]ors SUi u/s ~'tf~~ ts4~s^ AMO see Houngery icaeumR cmb •. AecevarY tlltg.l •. " N.Ir.. m"S Raiden4v &WOit1R 9gvetWx Front :o bans Ni N ]ttS xi a1 d0 Y Other N/R 1Va 10 l ~ t li 11 NeiRRt IAmiYtim li „ ~ ]5 ` I •~• i0( P<~ Lot LoY~lR. E54 IR 504 ORr 504 YM IMlNlmum rot aPn ~'! Requvo¢ ' Pnretr opee spelt xagal NrR IlOa9l/a ]00,150 LHIK 130/100 Iflrt~P (GrounE Floor Upper Smry Cmtt ' Camman open SDee¢ I N, R 11(R N/R LIM ]D4 tar Ullmmum el esol<u0<n SDelt' 634 r•• 104 If)1 ]34 Pf{ (porn le .+ t'ommpnl RetrptlenAm/PeeWty V R NA NrN a0pYR0 Dtr See. tTdR.W~1 I+ndewRle a R e agr,.l per s.e. nw.oPa-e Eerlm:,nq inn0 n.aaer v !n ~ nngery 5lre¢If etM lrterieN. r n. \4 a reJ fr+ ^ u LLn •uD face an Vu pllc or orvv<le gretb. I eh.npl.• :' ~ rn¢u o:neenl to .5e¢uon Ii.UI,OSO-H I. bin I i l .9:I+rn1 ¢ la t L. L or L'.I Jn Vlet. l i L.ol V Lerv 1"nn ~~ II .n1n~n'.v rn gmree nulometlC RlreR! OOOr W<nera, 4nm; 1. ~ I I I~ct.~lN.vr..Ip .lnat:or mulllDlx !emlly e+ellings. Ynn~.mr i! ,Inennr vrr¢t vva. n. A sl ntly .'rUn~ e ? M ~Iwapnq lea men luV sgwre (¢et will rpmn see approval eU CanalOOnU P~~ ^n per >r¢I .uo Cse 1 ~, u1,eJp. a~~ ' -76- rj L) R - q (10!19/84) Section t'A9.040 C. Optional Development Standards. The following table, Tebie 17.11E.0411-C sets forth minimum development standards for residential development projects filed up to the maximum density permitted by the density range. TABLE 17.08.040-C OPTIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS r7-i/a. Nu ewpnel SIRdM Site Afr 1Hfan5 Iot Afp fmiNmum ne4 MusOr M DwWrf 0eitee IpumitlM pu eMl IIDiWsie DweRDir ONI Siy Slryle (. Wily 6neMd OfreWM w1Y Id DISe011me Minimum MIdtN (O required .rmt M10H01() M W sum DqN ~S~D LoW SVUI UD t0 I S,M333! N/R ""~. ' N/R ~~ YI f l"F C~~~I~. v'~dt N/R ~.i° x ''-~h,. N/R a 9~ vuY YS vµ/ li 5• 15 av{ ~. ~:4L Prlate Street or Sd' ~. µ Or4ew.y vwr6!' vary xs ,. rv;p.'x; Corner S;de Yud 11D .~ IOe t s ? "~„~'r~ `. N/R D ': iqF Nrenor Side Yem yyl 1 ' N/R ~'~.ya-- MFR At Imenar +~ .,. ~~' w is w1Y Srt<SOUndery IDn6WnH Lnll/ Accefe0ry dldH.) + ReMdmtiel auUdlR Repvatim: Pronno From >N ]5 1IH NIR N(! Oleer ~ 10 ~ NiR MR Ne1rNt LimlUtlorM ~ YS SN IOq NS Operi lD'ea Regiorei3 PtlveSe Open Speer tl1rYR/! t0U/150 yi/SSr ^' l5o/IOU LpytM IGrwm Yloprl Uppr St W y Unitl eemmM open Spena N SU0. 3{f ISb Y313 (minimum 0.1 UaWb Open 9peeee M{ IShi SMt IOb Aii arvete eM comment Re+nella ArWreeiaty N/! Requmed /r3yt r section Ii.gAYA :r-.63Pafi:im ' - ... pass ~ seeuon tr,a3.IN-r Pfant YW I~fiypepuiH leyeyY Dunwnt M hcliM I1.U/M-g Rnern Clele~raliw R/! Requiree Sfley3 M 9eetlan It.U3A1F8 3. Eaclud;n8land+eefssery for fecOnduyslreels end uMm3lf. p. Af mPmttd from ells mete taro fen en pu01m Or private uroelf. Refe. io Te01e L•.UB.OJU-0 for eddrtiOMl aettleeu ;nfmmaLOn. a Lim;i I-slaty •;In;a 100 feet of YL er L DuV;el for multiple Fundy dwelliiMf. d. Add I] feel d edpeent to u L. L or LN dsV;el~ e. Leif Inen IB !eel from nnfx of ndewaIX v;tein cond0imuum tOwnNwfe w epulment requ;ra sulo'nehe garage door Opener. iNreRe vetnecv m 10' m;mmum i( side entry gerege ufed per iecoon I.ASuIU-L wtlmf fmgle fnmily deleee<d's¢mrdrteege0 dereloDmml. I. Pen meter lendfeeDmg end mtenor Water Re01. Y. A fin(1< (fm11y d•inenrd dM<Il;nr I<if Iran 900 sgwfr (ttt M;II r<qu;fe IC't lDprOra of a [Ond;li0nll ufr pefmN Der 3fepan II,dJ.U]0. A, Arc 101 line dnelLnp Dermrtted per Secl;on 1(.03.010-0. 1, Refw to TNN IP.OLOIOCl uq TeVla It.w.D10CY. RESOLUTION N0. 88-65 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COIMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 88-03, TO MODIFY THE LON MEDIUM ANO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DEYELOPMENT STANDARDS NHEREAS, on the 13th day of April, 1988, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised pubiic hearing pursuant to Section 65654 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Caslssion has made the following~nd~gs:: 1. That the Amendment will provide for development of a comprehensively punned urban coaamnity within the District that is superior to development otherwise allowable under alternate regulations; and 2. That the Aax!ndment will provide for development within the District to a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth management policies of the City; and 3. That the Amendment will provide for the construction, improvement, or extension of cransportation racrtines, puDllc utilities, and public services required by development within the District. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga planning Commission has found that this pro ec w not create a significant adverse effect on the environment and recommends to the City Counci•1 the issuance of a Negative Declaration an April 13, 1988. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLYED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Cannission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Yictoria Coamunity Plan imenament 88-D3. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Counci'i approve and adopt Victoria Community Plan Mnendment 88-03 to modify the Cammmnlty Plan per the attached Ordinance. ~~ 0 PLANNING CgNiISSiON RESOLUTION NO. VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLld! AMENDMENT 88-03 April 13, 1988 Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED TMIS 13TH DAY OF APRIL, 1988. PLANNING CGIAAISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCMIONGA ATTEST: I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretay of the Planning Coaaalssion of the C1ty of Rancho Cucaewnga, do hereby cert/fy that the foregoing Resolution ws duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Caa>wission of the City of Rancho Cucaapnga, aL a regular meeting of the Planning Ca~aission held on the 13th day of April, 1988, by the following vote-to-wtt: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: @LAKESLEY, TOLSTOY, EMERICK, CHITIEA NOES: LOMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MC NIEL X99 ORDINANCE N0. 3 ~~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAY;ONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENpAENT 86-02 TO MODIFY THE LOW-MEDIUM AND MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DEYELOPMENT STANDARDS follows: The City Council of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a puD11c hearing held in the time and manner prescrl6eQ by law, recommends that the Community Plan text anrendmM'nt hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law and duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That this Camwnity Plan text amendment is consistent with the Generai Pian of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. That this Community Plan text amendment is consistent with the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. u. Tina i.umnunicy rian LEXL amenanenc wni nave no significant envirormnental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The Terra Yista Community Pian text, Dart V, "Residential Developmen an ards, Low-Medium Density Residential," commencing on Page V- 4, is hereby amended, in part, to read as attached. SECTION 3: The Terra Vista Community Plan text, ParC V, "Residential Developmen an ards, Medium Density Residential," commencing on Page Y-5, is hereby amended, in Dart, to read as attached. SECTION 4: The provisions of this Ordinance No. shalt not apply to ose res dential subdivisions wherein a Tentativ ap has been approved prior to the effective date of this Ordinance; provided nd material a~~Rnw,n:nts or eaiensions are made io such previously approved Tentative Maps. For the purpose of calculating those provisions which are the sub,~ect of this Ordinance, those standards effective as at the time of approval of such Tentative Maps shall apply. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shalt cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of 3aa Ontario, California, and circulated {n the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 3 a/ r .~ d q q.C 4 V I_ c d ''Nd N C L d~u K q O N Y d O N W Of cv Q L d n E q q JrN Y 9 C C T C C ~V~6 ~ ]~ N Yd q ~ J LC C N ~ O q L Oy w ~ q C M ~ Qpppj~~~~ C CI g L 8 y~ ~~Y C T p'•' d z v rn~ O g N d 0 J J•~ LW N O d N cYr Cd O N ~[~1 a N 3 E 2~up~ d L O' di p Y q p 9 8 O d ~ N N OI OCC o rn 4+ 3 W d U O y c LL 'O N y N C O N L 01 ~ C L Y E t d~ y p ~ '~ y a q mgr Y+j° „°, ~ ~ a^! y^ Y} q N 0. N 10 LT V C q + q U i .• q d _ ~ N OJ _ C^ V % d N L y~' L.O O 0: q q q ~ y T C~ 4l N ii O' O~ V p 6 ~ N N doQ N qyC- O U d _ J~ «' C ^ N ~1[l 4 ~~ L ~~~ J W J C N d •p • • p W 0 Y C N C d L N L ~ 01~ w V~ d 9 d V W d C N y Q^C~ c~ d pp1 d CUysaNyy( ~~yyNy{{ C V••n- 'JN uyd q6 v C'^~nn L ~ N•rc-=~ VI~V U ~ 6 dW mg 4RM ~ :°. ° ~ ° °: ~ v :° '° O O N Tom' dL _~,N anew dYV N~~ggJ qA qV-~ O~yO 6 C O N~d>O, N'^~~~ d u W q N J g d O OI @ L q NM1C-a T.~-1 'O c`y n N N E~ o L L V ~O C~~+s ++iOO~ a d•r d OlL ~ODUL L C~~d L+O-~~MWW q> t Ep q 9 O U N GNnnW d6 Via L U u p d~~` ~ ~q~ d cc m u - p.- E cS.dV O« •G Vqq tNtJJW c O W t~ d W~ T O N O ++'~!! > d Ol H M i0 V N U 6 AO> W~ec-qN ~ m d ~_ O d N N d d C L M T L•+Y L i+ U~ Y ~ W T N +- L P~ ~ C V- QI ~a N YNM+~U~O~ E ~ C C p d O d E D. ?O~p OptO td+~~O yO V t^ C t g V O O V y C{ i O Y q N q O~C~ V wNqy0. d d d ~ O w d c d y O d~ L D N C L d t ~ ~ YI C Y L d u J/ t y •~- N C wN O~gC~Q'rN dF, Vy~ O ~ d ~ q N N d JQV OdW O~ MOW ~ d j N C C=~ q N w i~udi ••'.pi~ WN nN d q+ L E y J%~ rv $ ~' v N vtee~~'I+d cd1iK O w ~e~ o V r g w d q a i Y !qq!~~ U W y d L ~ L L Y 6 Z i A ~- L L W •id- T ^ q i N d d q )y UL.r l~~-l.~i~LYuGiy, L'N•Lr •r q 4 a@ U n N g N A~ 9 S~ V K i N O p 3na- NSr-V •O LdppO y~ dNl1V'6dON]~dd~- A gdgNg l7~pUVC 6 tgdC C.C i~ga,C L 0. L N E^ 0.V Y N€ ed q ~+ F- L A d C d d .1.s C q U N ~ O C F 6 N • •L y T y LYV a C~+ UI qq CCC c~ p A aT ~~ L~ N V O N E ~ 6 ~0. LW q~ O i O~ d d A^~NCL.n4A~dU 9Y app X N~OM~.C-y da++'C qL O. d d ~q C E V C q ~O E N q d C 0+~+~~9 0 W ^ 1~ L i O N N L L~ y U .C CA ~ .. y 8 yCy ~ V V T y p 0. y m y Nq ddad Nr N~'^O MV OI V• 1•! YVOL q~V 01~E ylE D ~L t~LL 0O~ Od q 4l O.Y O^ YV Oip Eq . CV V~Yq[ \C21 ~qq yy6~ _~^ ~ M CM~O9UGp N0. LYY OOOL~p~0. p^LL V~ d Or ~ ~'01L TV^V qdY C.dC W I'I A OfTOL N~ ~ y ar, O>IUNC LL~GCLV 4~yp V ~L..C.YdLON ~ N L B. ryLQd~O.T0. pOO W^V N•• A••~ C E U y Oy VCy P 01 p1 C C p) yy1 ~~0.lQUQ8VL Ea0.bE'Wyl~ VET O D ~ ~V AL 01s O.d AO^~L Vyo~201LAC L01F Ar ON > > `` NNOd+-CIL^~N ALLdY NPY~L0.^r0.UOdE m0. m m G d $rC-NCl.Al MY~ OCR +0~0-OK ~O .U. ~ .d.• ~ a A^ O L V N N W N O. d ~ L yyd~ ~~ T q dp, y ~ O L d O~ ( Vu~ F-C g01Y O L GOY A Z O ~~NqCO~^qC~Of.1 +Nd ~IS'M L YJ U IL C a 6 C O e N= ~~ C V ~ P N N ~ ~ ~ Vd +'9~~Udd CC CAN U N N O q C q C N y 6 Q 9~ N U N g N d C u C DIY a % ~, 0 C q d ~Nj O N d d yai q 9 y~ L e0.W N q ,~~. q% 0. E d N~ N "' L L iJ V N C q~~ 0. ~ C N ~ B N yy N N Y C t yy V N O yA ~ r O Ld a> ~ y1 V D U L dO ~LNNygC 6V VJi~L'N ^~ d 0. 9 ry LM N p1 ^ ^ g 6p q A pLOLUq U gggYppp N ~ a~ q 10 q T O L a N U yy a Y .G N= W 1F U L 9 3 t Y > M N d q r- O.q o i C m 4 0 V% dT N A V r d V C U t V q F lqi ey N~ A N L d d 7~ c o L 9 N S A id-' OI }} d LL C C T U g N d N T q N E L C y ff L N~ U N C g U1 N Y OIN L L L V O V N V 0 0 E~ G~ d +> V~ O D W Cy^ 9 V~ L~ L +7 V d^ N V^^ C d pl U~ ^ O 1 C Y Y ~ G ^ O C 10 ~ Y~ i L O N d» .~ d L Y 9! ~ L j Y 7 O O~ ILL r U' O gqa LL Naa NV•O.OL Qf O.VE m m da .V.. ~ ~ v ~ ~ d v .a.+ V19 3a3 O N N 41 N O 41 N~ O ~0~~ cVY cW N c T ma +-x ~L ~ nE .-a r Y °i s ~ '^ '- °' cY y ,~ ov vv Y v c y Y q ~ p v a rV q •t ~ a > Y Rte' Y N a qyy ~n 9 Y o n ~ °m CN 01V WAY u~,,~ ~ U E~ V N v ^ 6 d OI N+ L A~~ C OiN N N~ fU~ YY p C C N Wy N W W o V r N ^ O ~ m W Y 9 6 p^ ~ y N 6 EE ~I C Y X C y Wy CI N ~ A y~ ~0. ~ Y ~C O ~ro Y N N N C G ~Y p D. r N 6 C ~Y'^O O~ ^YO C~ ^ N C d 'E C^ N ~ a ~ O O U N O C q W~ q N C~ C d t Y N i' O _ C Y YL~OI E b~MN O~~ V~ C i~ G _ L G yy yN ~~pL 41 CU~F~ TUr ~ ^ U U C NV V C N Vlrct NrV UN V ~ % 9Om " ~ v .U.. ~ v v C O ~ V CM ~~ GI N C L O S J~V-V- O ~ ~ ypOOy ~~j ~ a~T ~~LrYy1 wfyuJ~(' Xi~~3u"i~ p C .. My [sa, LC G~M QV M N yL~N~T T " ~ ~• NyG yyO ~ ^ p`~LT.~C~S~@I~C U~~Y epep upC ~ ~ ~ ~ C y i q ~ O ~ ~ N C ~ ~ « L C ~p ~ yj ~ Y C T ~ b ~M r~~~ ~So ~ ~ ~ ~y5!~~y4~«g~g~~~~"g " " A~ ~ VY ~ ~ a*`pY V i0 N`~ `1~0 V~a~C V C W~ OI>VFH C^ ~ ~OI r~ ~y! O1 d a r N + F. > V N ~ w~ ~ 'O ~ ~ A Y U ~ T^ ~ Tq n 1 y~~ C C N q q M C CpG T aG Yp y .r TL ~ V M T N .r ~~y T ~ ~ ^ T ~~ r ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~V~$~aa~i 0 ~y W f 2 2 E O W W .y O i FJ• J O6 ~~y W ti O LL m 2 O J m rn o~ > > q q C C + ° Nd•~ N Y M V- W Y w~ a+ ~ q fQ m Ih L L a m V M q N q I V O N 6 N c c c M N L~ ~ E E E 3 rn u q ~ c 3 c ~ W ~ w W w W ~O Y •~ W w / N 4r - V~ ~+ W ~ ~ •~ ~O N N N MOD aO O ~ ~ T O~ i > q q C C O O Y U V V V- V• .IJ iJ Y q i i a DD m a+ m a N N P Ol W C C C N L' N N ~ 'O @ ~ E OS Ol C _ C N L .. . NN N H 1~ VVV V'O O W V- V- Y- 0. V- V_ 0.0. P P 0. ~ 2 •r r V • 00 O r N m MM . -1 1~ N O Od l7L O 01 q Of OI A s 1~ N A C C O O U F W ~1 - V~ ~ i•~ N y y ~ N { ~ N y M C y V 6 N E N C C C C C Y N L N c L ~ EEE N + V ° ° O r O~ zc ILL ' n r D M W~ M 4• N W V V- V Y V V-wV- ~ q Y~ y Y T+ -r V w RED N N N mM~ N pp 2 L C L O O O q N Q 1 L @ O V .y ~ - i _ ! • N d 0 oy ~ l H L Y L" O NLr ~+ r Ma t q NOI V N J D d Q~ N@ N @ N V c yy N N L W d 4 ° `d 17 m O rn a o S 'L s y v'S ~ t ° ~ ' 01 n o u i w ~ ~Q7C o ~ h ~ ~_ ~ ~ H h S 1 n a N 4 - o vy i+W c O ~~ T ~~ H ~ LL m4 W N i O m x u v' ~i a z N a H U ~y N V C 4 O N L O rn c Ya- a+ w ti ~ ~ .pa e_ ~u Na a.~ dc- ~g d~ M w N Y W "w "" o w rr O b .-~ W W W O O O EvE r O M d d r N on c l N E N ~ W C V yg ~ O O O c u ° o W r U C o .- a L d ~i ~ o N AIL L de~ o w r N ~ A u y ~ L ~ N L d L \~4~ A 9 O ~ T N C ~ v T N C d O e '.' r A q GI cQa M u o L c y O 80~ N c yon L9 c M O Ol N • C U N ~ d O U d ~i~ WN YyV W v v °u m Y d ~ N Z A C O N ~ L O O.W „ '~ uci a~'+ / 2 d ~ dY j L O Ca A d O1 N ~ A L a y~~ d O i~ W w 01 y N Lr C O~ arc v uA T~ N d O N N L 0. ~ ~ n }I O ~ Ol~ V• Qw4LL dV NN d e YN L d E W Q Y ~ H ~ LO c ~ c M L c ~i N T d~ V r w~maiOi s°u .y N v c v E~ L tw V .~+ ti N A d p N +-i ~ d N G 9 G Y M ."- °r i n i L O A U d r u a 6 G ifl L d d O O N C O N N N i i N 6 u Ng = 8 ddy L L ~F OI N N O~ d C O Y S .~. n a < _N _T m ~ G S y !T m y ~ y 9 S ~H~ T ~. C 9 T m ~~ y ~< IN 4 0 r ~~ ~! ~~ i' i ~~ ft i '3~ ~Q~` `_ ~' rs ~ w w r w .~ .-. ~ .. Y ~ 11 BI Ali D_ ~! $ O 3 i F mti .~ m s~ b N, O w _r 41 T ~. C 9 T T a t 3 s c e ~~ < v~ F w N o p o p v ~ i t p ~-• N a O C ~ N J ~ N[ Ip b~ 0 b ~ H p ? G+. S -~ ~. O M fl p , v S PO C• H J ~ H S y C H S lNN(p+H ~ 3 C dH J (p l O. (p Z (p « < d J N d y J O '~d ~ 'S N C H G N NN ~ SN•~N 6 d H O F+ 9d O J J N WH b H J n L j d H C m ~ O J N H O+ 0 ? f S J W K N H ~f 6 lD H d N~ O 3 ID N IG N H O N (/~ H N 19 M A N r. ~ A p N H Z Z r• ^ A .O HSn O~ b H S t0 3 l T~~O~OO' 10 Hb O V i V I fD N N J 0. N S O H m O a b "``tttt ~ d~ .~ a vJi N ~ r • l o Hd a~±R ZZd ~m + °s ' u mn o ~ i C r . r ~ n !~ r c ; m m o c~ H~ i'~ m n m d .- .J ti s .i e o o ~ G ° ~ i ~ a n ~ L v ~ m y N m J N fD r• . ~ ., r ~. IO K J a~ lG _ b p IQ b C N J A fY H 10 N O d M O l a H 6 S y'-~ N T ID l n 9 S ~^ ry m a ~ J~ a~ d~ N -5 2 N Nd ry ~ ~NH N P ~~ bH N~ H~Ny ~~ N N V O HC ~ y ~ N 0. N V -}1~~b ad d A ON ~1ipD~ O • 6 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ M O H y 6 ; ~ Z W C b N py N! 3 N ~ - - ~ D 0 ~ e n b ~ ,~ i I ~ H til H ~ H '00 O O C a O N b R J N y • H H ~ 1 H C -1 b -1b f~S~ `° N~ P I+ N O~Od r QN O'N l ~ l• M ( N o M° ~ pp°~ =oa~a e~f e o ~ o ~ ~ ~ H Z ~ • O O C g g dz Sa ~< a a MJO"~ ~ a3 p l ~ J ~ 'J a N ~ N ~ N ~ 1T a ~ °g .~ ~ ~ ~ N ~N nJ~ - ~ ~ (° ° . µ0 ~m O m N ~ 10. gN W ~ O n Nr. p vu r 'J f. J J b~ c~ cr ~''~a ~+AR m J N i .~,. N N C +~ ~' b b o ~ n t i m A ~ ~ ~ S rt 10 2 '~ : N d ~ O n A~~ N~ T O ~ N WW O O O O1 w ~ j ~ R J d eb1 S J NIC O N g ` N 16 K M f~f f~f N 'i O H J O~ ~ O ~ ~ . n 4 ie. J 10 N O 10 W 1 N Oi Z _ 1 • O i N ~ M M 1 YI YI S 1 .l. 6 i _ r. ~Xd F: N ~ NO ~ ~I ~ ~ A ~ ~ ~ v~ Vi ~ y ~ 7 (D N O ~ ITr ~ ~ j Q 'f a ~+ r a a a P UI p 6 G ~ ~ n f00 C ~ -.. m ~ <~ -- ~ 1 6 N+ ~• ~ 3 ~ N `+9 N N N U1 10 N ~y •y~m O CI O H N ~m S N N 3 N N s •s s ~~ b~ ~~~ ~ ~'a ~~ .~ a '~ JEQ i w Q u L E n E J H gW 6 O D M e !~ W mJm py F O: W N J U K VI 0 J 3 x u a L d O: V ~y N O N Y ay N Y C li 9 O C .C O 4 as A A Y Y W ~ w m ~n v c c c E E E WP Y W Y V .. V - y.WW Y NO 4)N Il1 f7 (pm W •-1 .1 ~i N N I71~1 th I(1 rnrn a > A A Y Y w W p] p n1V C C C B B @ w W Y Y Y 4 . V - W P W V - Y ~ 00 O1~ G mom .'-1N r-1 H N PI 1~1 m l(1 T i A A ~~ aD ^! M VT c c c ` ' e e e Y Y W~ 4 -w W W4V - Y 0. ~ ti ((pp t0 N N !~1 M PI N « ~ O ~Y Y~ A V- A lA t L m A In A 6 N 6 t d d Y N t N 3 m Y ~ c s c Y W ~ Y r Y W -Y W O > > o .~a qua O C C O O YY Y.1J y-i ~ i 1(1 A In A N O. N 6 L WN L NN Z C 2 C 0. W W r w 0 oa Boa o 6 O W A V- A d L L Itl A Yf A DO N ~ N ~ U ~ N Y N a'n~ sc 6 Yc Wr PT ~L Z Oa ua o a t H ~ w E O d a .y L N N d i+ r T Lr YO A t ~ c V O o Y ~ A L J N OI i N J d p p-~~ N E N A ~r- Y yy AN c W d i rye rye r ~ ~ . fn (1 V G 0 N~ L g O d i d d d d a Y N a Y ~ ~~ ~ d.- O ~ p Lyy O o- y gggp Ara yY O 6 1 NO q C ^ ^ c ` p j6i 023 ~ ~i NN X gJNS (~,~ t i L J LL 4 t ' N T N QQf Z~ O W W O M ~~ J ~~ H J U 4 N F H Z O Y U A a L iy C yU N O h V My N V L W v C U c C ~ F ~ O ~ O v c v p N N N V N d d~ dr dY ~~ S~ 5~ 'w d u m YW NV Vw W 0.W W O.-1 O ~o O ~ W w W O O O r1 r1 r1 r A C va N ~ N C Y 6 q d t G U K C a o~ o ~a ~ i N C O Y v C O U L a 0 N Y L d C m L O V ~ E ~ v Y W ~ y 4.1 ~ y a d i q G \~ N N 9 p d c y V A C V C m r N C ~p~ A ~ N w N C 6 C y O y Ld O O O ~ U u Y L ^ +~ M d L V C i Y 10 ~J O q ( u~ W N N N L +'a ~ Na ~ y y N ~ O. y ~ L N Y L y M y ~+ O ~ y U a y d ~ _L q N N L y G y. O o yYw-L d L. O p O T~ ~+ wl U ~ N~+V Y d Y d ~ N N y ~ L 1 V' O 10 J J N 6 N O. ~Nr H L a y > t c 6 d Y ~ N Y O O ~ y y d O y a w Y. o N C n V d of c m q N qry C d N N O ~r ~ L L A ~~ N ~ A y O a S L J U O J y . q'r OI ~ Y N Lp m I L yy y V C ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ y N N e ~ ~' H y O q d L- U ~ W ~ C 9 N }~ a N . N.'-- C W J u q w n a Y~N~ ~91~MM NGt~C N N NE.-Y.p@LWOO A•'~~ t~YY (MC~~/ OGO1I .rGG ~' ~ gE~y ~IIhI OO UyY e C ~QSM Cyy~~~M NO ~NOT{O~ U NEiOL yECyE VG-YLLUI In Y ~ ~Y S ONLY N S L E U e~W cG~ YI L NY Y N Y ~NN~pV q~~11~0 A N p~~NWj~V..GLV V 4'~~~~e y~N Qo~Y ~ ~ A L aiu-=1iY ec EY °ca L1~OY~M~~eu^~+ ° A Wq0 NLLLUI_U< qOl 9.tl~ YA~~~77i HM~M~E A ~ LT >YL GIdN ~~M'a0 N O +^ CO N~ A S ~ N 'J q° N ~ ~ A y A O A R L t O O O ° N W"s gNLzM~~~p~~~~ILi ~~ EEy aoi u~ L~~y ~o~u°p~~ «~ Y~CLV C eVNyV p~ G N °r Pf7NG ~~C p`.- Nvny NSYV ~/ ~ p~+L CT WY C NeWi yNw •~UN^NMyy YO yC GM ~ ~ p~ a T T (q V 6 0~ C W y ^ Y U A~ ~ ^a N N Ufa y„~ ^ ~ 6i4~T[Sj~ GS jjrrN~~11 I^Yp~AY=~}~}yY1~1~ Iy~gJ_~I~$cG ~yY1M~pC p °OS ~ LC ~yO ~ pLA CLOP agNIG ON r FV6~~~V'J I~,~N ~~~G~U~ N9 q V} NPV~.LP~~-PVOW~ vp V O i f Y N~1 d 6LY+_CN_~_Ldm ~Ya yyi~pp lY P Y Y Y L q W O Z 6 W A A r Q ~ N N U LL C L^ C O C N T ~~ r V O A Y O' / i D Ou y O Y L d~ N O j E uy +~ P . G N N OI ~.- N N N p p~ P A L C N° uO t d U N M 5N6 d ~ ~~ Q q ~ 41 N Q N YI 41 Y q q°~° L V~ t L ~ O ~ 1 N m> L~ VJI P= L M yYj O N C A p O p C Y= ~ ~~ qX G ° A y q C q( O,~ yA g T O a R A N q `} E °' ~c LIY La NO OZ EI N'AG EY UY~NIn 1"°TN ~p OI A~ A q A U O Y~ N q ~ Y A~ Yyy y p N O A Ny G~ °_ N L N NI N~ VN Ar pG i'~.A°~~OV U01~~UfJ~ ~CU Oy 1~1 ° UplQ N~ a$v' UN NNgNLLFy A~N GI YIq ~~~Y Y~ OI n.l iS _ Yr .~ Y I ° Y W 16 W ~ S y_L OI LM1 l.' D w 5. C O ~ ~ NUT N y V' N W N r g N- L C T~ C L ° ° N~ t + > S °~ ° Ol G!G A A C S q u G C 0 H v T y G~ L A~ V p ° A~' cI~/~o qmH Wgoa r°yL~°WYyyy'~(~~,y"LG ~YtM T d^ m E LL Q M U' rG- O E A AG L N L R N~~ O L 0~ ~ {r N^ OC ~ m N ~L• .-. ~A.. = OI v' o ~/ N v vq C N V O a O Y VI O Ea . M O Myy r O.O ~~ } .. L d G O1v d • >w ~~ dy ~ !~ N ~ m~ G r m d 1~ C ~ + Ev C V E u d C L C q } •-1 q N L Y q q d ~ V d N N OI OI C C ~v e > > ~ mm> .q.. v a C O ~ d a ~ a i d o v N q N F d U C A ^- V V y C q q U ,v L + O O.Q u N d V O) q L N c~ d - N x x rn c L n W L dv > 1 O >• U ~~ a ~" L W Y N d Y M O q q p °uv v' L a+ w66, v N Y v " C q qV d N o w 3 ~ o- d L V '^ nay C Y v+ ~ v m O. .d. E >' . E N d 6 .. O~Rd' L f.l O u O d d •r d No Y GV r 6] N E V d v rn d C v m v O1 V •ec- L OI d d L d w r N m N C q ~ Y ~ V Ld ! `~ys y a+ w ~ iw ~r Ol m C N N! N~ CY C•• r VdV- ~ 01 ~~ COOL C 0 V L 6 d C a m oLCde c'L .v Nr dN V W O L C_ Y_ O N C_ G_ •r~ L L N V V d C L U n.'-opuSt~m~~'c~ 6 U 6 L N U Y d t q '06dQ~O.i Orr ~ y L V L L N r L N O.GO 3 q E ~ q~ Of o 6 g r o W L d d V k C N..-.~- OI G~iI L O.V q N Y^~ g Y N L O.N ~~ U G ys N 9'-r d q C 6 q Y O 6L ~ V d~ N M L V O~ d L ~ y ~~ dV Ogd~v.0~0i1y U ~ VNgO~iddq n01dNN >T N > C q . O~ {psJ~ •" C q Cf W OI y V t L y O 'O q d9y~O C4 ~Y NCL yCyM > y' ~ N Oi0 ~NEL m O. gaONdOVCOVdY 60 V~ O V g L~~ d d d D T j g d+ O+ V V 9 V V- v L L d 0. .- O LL O C L 0. d d c v f V 9 O U V M f] q O. O N O r q VI d v N c Y N d O L Z J 0 A A d V Y U C q 9 V N N C N d~~ 4' p Y ^ i d N y 6 yc 9 O N ~ p C >~ r 6 _ ~ 6 C yS q O O N C v y a „°. L N V q n .- ,eia~ u ~ •"~ OI C O1G ~ _ w d M O~ N O v m~ e c d J r L ~( d d LL d T C' d d ~ N Oi N C M r W W W V O W~ O L G U Y V L 0 3 C ~ g O N p~ V L O O. Ot q V V N •~- >~ q>~ N N C N d d G] N p g e v w d g d q OI d L 6 Y C L G ,°o oo°v isYV woo ~ d"v'ca~ ai+ Q € c V ~ O d c L p N g N N L is ~ N y{C u T U N W V> d b y V 6 W L V~ O C 6Y '~vT yVgNd6q O d W> N d ~ L .O c M~ Q OI Y ~ O C y g C A~ N c n q O.T 9O g CY VENN OL Ld0 yyc~~C q>sU> >~n~~3° ~iu~ V ~ q O V YI cd a N G HM~O.OOY~'~ndY 0 NTC 1CO V NV x~x«~OL n ca rd `~c~OLLd ABi qC qN O.t~CdMLdyyd d~ t d L~ ~~ d C~ 0 0 C O L 63 L O.O q N OIU M •d O N > t u ~ W l a ~ c y .a0 a $ v ti C N c d > ° a 4- v O V v T q C C ~ ~ pe r q O. d Y L ~ N 0. N q v i o N q u q ~y J O W ' ~ pp W N _ +O~ q V ~ N G~ A ~ q v ~'' ~ ^' o d ,. . ~ N ~~ p i~A c V C ! q C ~ U N ~ ~ u m N VO00 V V ~. .. ... O O 9 C V aEc O N v q i+ 9 H 1 N ~ C a D ~° no ~~ t ~ O1U •TZ. ~ v ORDINANCE N0. 3C/ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 8B-03, TO MODIFY THE LON MEDIUM AND MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The City Councii of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTICN it T17e Ci Ly Councii hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends that Community Plan text amendment hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law and duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That this Community Plan text amendment is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. That this Community Plan text amendment is consistent with the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. D. This Community Plan text amendment will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the negative ueciarati on filed herein. SECTION 2: The Victoria Community Plan text, Part III, Section I, Regulations and Standards for Development, diagrams "Typical Garage Setbacks" on Page 204, is hereby amended, in part, to read in text and graphics as attached. SECTION 3: The Victoria Community Plan text, Part III, Section I, Regulations and Standards for Development, subsection "Residential Development Standards Low Medium Density Residential", commenr_ing on Page 212, is hereby amended, in part, to read as attached. SECTION 4: The Victoria Community Pian text, Part III, Section I, Regulations and Standards for Development, subsection "Residentiai Development Standards Medium Density RPCidenrial', commencing on page 224, is ha-eby amended, in part, LO read as attached. SECTION 5: The provisions of this Ordinance No. shall not apply to those residential subdivisions wherein a Tentativl~ has been approved prior to the effective date of this Ordinance; provided no material amendments or extensions are made to such previously approved Tentative Maps. For the purpose of calculating those provisions which are the subject of this Ordinance, those standards effective as at the time of approval of such Tentative Maps shall apply. /~~ ORDINANCE N0. VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 68-03 Page 2 The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (I5) ddys after its passage at least once in The Dail Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published Tn the City of n ar o, a form a, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 3i~ TYPICAL GARAGE SETBACKS FROM CURB ONLY FROM CURB AND WALK ao a~o[w~~K> ~~ wdY ~I h ~~ ~ dam- Jr._., a. ~...~ _.~..+_ s iwi n.Awa ~'lialc ~~wAir ~~ dmr N yS'f~bs NA' . uoi ^NrRr wut `~ < ' RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (continued) / n l ~ ~ Low-Medium Density Residential ("LM" Land Use Plan designation): land designated as Low-Medium Density Residential is intended for residential development that has a range of four to eight dwellings per adjusted gross acre. The following regulations are applicable to these areas: a. Uses Permitted: detached or attached residential dwellings not e;~caeGiny elyht dwellings per adjusted gross acre, including, but not limited to: (1) Single family attache dwellings (2) Single family attached dwellings, including, but not limited to, duplexes and triplexes (3) Cluster Housing (41 "Zero lot line" homes (5) Community Facilities as specified on p 241. b. Accessory Uses Permitted: any of the f uses and structures (1) Garages and carports, in compliance with the site development standards provided herein ([~ hences, walls, and trellises (3) Swimming pools with a minimum 5 foot high fence enclosing pool (4) Accessory uses and structures necessary or custama ri ly incidental to a principal use as permitted by the Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Ordinance. c. Site Development Standards: (1) Single Family Center Plot dwellings (a) Building site area: 5,000 square feet minimum, 5,500 square feet average. (6) Building site width: 50 feet minimumm. It is intended that site widths will vary according to lot Size. (c) Building site coverage: varies according to lot size, see typical lot plans, pp. 214 - 223. (d) Building setbacks: varies according to lot site, see typical lot plans arM table. 3/~' ~b~ ii$ g • ~~~ ~~a ~a ~' G GV ~. Ls L8 ff e~. _ F Y` W W U S~ N ti N w N u///i \~~~~IO ~~ C C 1 a ~ • ~ ~ I ! ~. I ICI 'JI yy;; ~ N ti ~ Ur ~d~~ ^~ d ]I ~ ~~ $ C C ~d C R • • ~O ~ ~/ W W yO LO IF .N+ ~ GN ea, ~~ _~ P' P I V V A Ui e t ~ I W W W b ~~ ` N N ~ N 111 111 ~~I ~ ~ G G I C ' C I ya;', ~ ~ I 3_S W ~ w K~ N N O O RQ `.~ C O r uT t = I _ L O N N ~ ~ d U f[ Z C y yF c in ~y O O p N Yy N • udi K ~O i PN ~~C ~ ~ 3 O ~ W OIL ~W~ Y~ O C Q ~ L~ 1 d ~ U n_U 1 '6J L C gl F ~ j Q~ N ~ Y~y F)1 1 ~yC{1 EqN VyV 'J Y G N d @3 jS 1 8 „ L p^O N i 1py d r-. S K O 2 3/y C G C E E E y W W ~ N N N C C C E ~ Q u y ~ N ~ ~ N N ~ C G • e i w ~ W N N N PI I G Y y 4 rN I w N ~ I u 9 O G G y i i w~ L W a w ~ G O O fV F ~ 0 9 M N y C _ ^ yMy r N N i T I ~ V VS f A yy X111 L C~ 1 q` ~ y q f W U 6 T i ~H N ~ { 1 ••~ `N Q J Qfi ~ S L O. CO ~ O yd C O ~F M Z G C O r t~ WC M ~ M l Z ~ y ( ~_ O Y p O d p F~ yy N d V O C o .. Y L J (e) Building height: 35 feet maximum .~~ (2) Cluster housing I Q (a) Building site area: 2 acres minimum ~(I ~TQ_~•~' (b} Building site coverage: 50$ maximum (c) 9uilding setbacks: See diagrams for typical building setbacks, pp. 214 - 223, (d) Building separation: See diagram for typical building separation distances pp. 214 - 223, (e) Building height: 35 feet, maximum. (f) Building site width and depth: As permitted by required setbatks- (g) Private open space: 300 square feet arinlaas. (3) Innovative horsing (a) Building site area: 3,500 sgwrc feet adniau, 1,000 square feet areroge. (b) Building site coverage: fk perf(tted by required setbacks aM private open space. r~1 w..,..-- _ _ •-• a ~-" "~+. aee uiagraaa ror LyplCal building setbacks. pp. 211 - 223. (d) Building height: 35 feet axxiara (e) Building site width and depth: As peraritted by required setback's. (f1 private open space: 700 square feet a~n1r~. The above site developaamt standards apply to protects which are deeaed innovative. Innovation in single faaHly developnent Weans providing creative design solutions which address the critical concerns of neighborhood cagatibility, density transition, ang design quality. Innovative nroix to a% .-b.~...~_-~-_~ , Ts not ionotanaus, nor . is ~ they streetscene daa>fn ~ iby asphalt/concrete, garages, and cars. Innovative design aa!ans finding spaceire ways to create well-designed space, particularly usable yard 3~ T W A 0 a r~ S ~~ D d d.~ d m S~ ~1 , ~_ ~~ ~ ~a ~ ~C~ i ~yq S ~ W ''`~ '~-' i ~~ a y d ~.ti~ LL ~~~~1 ~1 1 ~' i6 C C C E Q E W W W ill If1 N Y g F s Y- O O t f W ~ ti ti G G ."i r w W w c c • ^ W W 0 0 A 3 / L u c c c a E E ff o V ~e ~ k 4 w 0. y N 1(i L ~"~ N C C C C E Q ~ W I ti N N ~ c 'a n /~ . E ~l c ~«\ •Q ~ N , ~ y1 °J e i L w w N N MT ti < < • f W W O pN Gd f I V /~ 6Y N ` <~ J c ~ ~Y g ~ ' Y ~ ' YV ~ yO au rr ~° o~ e~ 0 4q Y Y ~ ~ N ~ ~ u °c $.c~ eYi g ~o: ~jr~ V 6 rT~sq, ~ia~ `yy~Ld '. A NL' ' ~/ yN C W 2 .; T Y ~ ~ e ~ .A- ~O ply W ~q +~ N V Y ~NL u O 'o tJ L c C V ~ _ I t V pLG O C6 O O 1 O v ~ c w ~ Y M .°. c s S ~jc i T Y w uQ 64 F 0 yN l d ~°+ V d u d U N~ d TW l P rn~ c~ 'u FT s= Ny Va N q JN Q~ YN G L P c~ ~ n ~ o • c W ~ F}' tJ 1 ~ G C ^T r ` =i 1 dS S C~ G O Oq 0 l ~ v W M ~~ ~ O Vyu N N C Y O u M N O O v ~ ~~5 $ c 6 u o ' ~T ~ ~ u N N C i ~ / `LM' LAND USE m~.a bt N[K sooo ..r. - aooo ..+. +rvkr arn.n.anK so x+oo n. yniec my /N ~^dR~'%~n.~e.:+gs ;S :rrsr pu ks (}5yw:.w.rj ~ , iyil~ny R~ [wL raddaui~Arv1., inay br. yo.~[ __-__ --. ~~: J` G~nya: iu gnr~e .retbna iw~dnrdi ~ Aav~wnt ~. rs(c nwl.~aow. ~\___--- ntyHbior m m~wtitty »uz ~... caMww~+ry pasrpw~ - w x4Utiawl s7s PI1uw~ m~wu. z,. ~a~ 1 i ^ 1~ 1; 1 1 1 ~~ l 3000-6000 S.F. LOT e~nbr plot e S 3 - i i5~t ~, ~,~a~n~d _. I Y~~%~~~~i'~i I ~~~~~~~~ ,/~ .~ M'~ z,s 3a3 sooaaooo s.F. nor :«o-Luc-un. may ~~~~ 1 YJOi~U iNO yiJG [tla~~ r~YiPh ~ MrtstMwn`_Covn?sK/: 6oA~ ~{araa .ril~yie/nnj (aw/ ~d 3a ~ J w V e I 1 1 "LM' LAND USE ~w M rbrt 7~N r.t. IwrtUw a p~-~f ~ MMM MNNMM N ~ 7t N. and aamct. or. ~ionivtG(: /reiw ~rx6~w nadr, 4wL anb ~peuPro m7! arnmc an. ~~~~b ~~ grrwar .~pv ~ ~y wo ronkrlaor ana ad~u~at asvuiaovnc om~.F .~e~.d cn de:atL~s +.~ prwi• ^.ad'.'rnwnR9 muu, and Enilic wne"ay" by ~0P'~' k<hvie ~+n/ase. ir< 7upun< ~iaragc Jufwk Scv.uJarJe J~.fcyard~ ~~,"7W. Rraswni iS min. uoo s.r. nor wlN-oM~Nw toM~~tH~ ~rotiot Swyrr' f(r wGy ~a/r xw.y.r~~',~" Frq~y~{ ~oR wog .rr 7y~4.1. s~ "LM' LAND U ~~. IrirY1Mfl11 bt Mt: 4th ~. itMO - bt - Ib~ o H~~ nwd" typkY 46 ^ ft. Acnrccrw a+d~rcmal vmdwnc +7yairrd~ arv dtwtrbnr vireli i~ r+aNf .^7d•, m.:~U~~ mu'><,.at¢ ~.4< °~ ~' Vkmriw fink Etwr»ra mot w< nwliw ~~^"~ r r i ~ '- y _ ~ ~ 1 r v/~" lV ~- m" / ® - ~' J ~ ~~ i i ;erUebtr ro pronde ~r'9 arv vrnerlau and adjr+rene 'n xrimwn~[q mu1 ryet[w. 'sm++nt-uru `,is"riwnnmt ..ruKrd.: o.v. ar mo.. nwiuawo--+ updU orv ~tvPafy 4~ne lnirraw .a~w1aN~ ruoble oPtrv .~lvs 3~ea btu by dtK/oye., nunimow I.s au+ pr. lor(rl~airs) krhuia .iaaye'. Ju 7Nynwl uargyc Subuk Sra,da.x4 SLfcyad~ a~%man. lob bsrwsoL bwldrhyf ~'m^" ,` ~ z,g 3a~ 35C0 -~96~ 3.F. l0T nrwloYlln~ ~'~~ ~ ~. Zet7 ~w-ef~,µrn. 3 ~-~ // / I Y/////////1 I ,w ryya+. j` j i~~~ '' :--;-i-. __~L_- _ ~ ~'lin9 a;fe-ahdfA cartes iNasGn«.o Catnyo 60FC o(arm~ vidu» yroprty 4',w o(s ,ns,r4. ro~t.wr.o~.+n+ur~ ~~ b a ~- ~~~ zzo 3a-~ RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (continued) 4. Medial Density Residential ("M" Land Use Plan designation): Land designated as Medium Density Residential is intended for residential development that ranges from 8 to 14 dwelling units per adjusted gross acre. The following regulations are applicable for these areas: a. Uses Penaitkd: detached or attached residential dwellings not exceeding focrteen u`weiiings per adjusted gross acre, inluding, but not limited ta: (1) Single family dwellings -attached or detached, including, but not limited to townhouses, triplexes, fourplezes, and condominiums (2) Cluster housing (3) Community facilities, pg. 241. b. Sik Developaa!nt Standards: (1) Cluskr housing (a} Building sik area: 3 acres Nniau. (b} 8uilding sik coverage: Aa perNtted by required setbacks and prirak open space. ici euiiming seLbiCks: See building setback dlagro~s on the following page for gryical setbacks. (d) Building sepsrotton: (i} buildings 35 feet or less 1n height, 10 feet minio. (11) buildings over 35 feet 1n height, 15 feet minio. (e) Building height: 40 feet nxio. (f) Building sik rldth and depth: As pewaitted Dy required setbacks, (gj Prirak open space: 300 square feet adnlaa•. (2i Innovative single family housing (al Building sik area: 3,500 sgwre feet adniaa, 4,000 square feet average. 3a9 (b) Building site coverage: 0.s peradtted by required utdacks and private open space. (c) Building utbaci:s: See building setback diagraas an the folloring page for typical utbacks. (d) Building separation: See building setback dlagrar. on the follartng page for typical utbacks. (e) Building height: 35 feet wciaa~. (f) Building site width and depth: As pertiitted by required setbacks. (g) Privets open spxe: 300 square feet adnlau. the above site develapaa!nt standards apply to projects chid are denied im~ovative. Innovatlau .in single faadly derelapaent amn providing creative design solutions chid address the crltiul canceres of neighborhood caapat1b111ty, dealty transltton, and design quallbr. Innovative projects arc characterised by an attratttre streetscape Mtd Ts not avmotanous, ner is the strcet scene dodnated by asphalt/concrete, garages, and urn. Ianoratlre design axons finding creative wys to create cull-designed space, particularly usable yard space. 33d i a ~ ~~ a ~ 9J ~~ ~- ~- - ~I s ~.~ } ~r~ W 6 ~~~ +-~-- e~.. ~~ a w a° ~` t = u ~ ~~ 0 W ~ ~ - - e- M g~J O Z ~ O b ~ W i b Q Q `F~ W~ ~3S b j~~ ,~~ ~ f r ~ ~~~ ~ I ~ R ~ r ~ xc 3 $ ~ ~ II ~ ~ ~ a ~' yb ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~` ~ ~'S` ~ ~ ~~ i I R °- ~ S2 I ~ 2 ''~,~ i ~ R ~ yi $ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~ G ~ ~ W ~ ~0 @~Y'~ J~ O ~„ Y V C ~] ~ ~' ~ a ~ ~ S S _ ' ~ ~ w ~ c ~ a §y5~~ ~ < y jy5~ I ~ w ~ 1O1yy ;~, ups F3 W S 5 ~ ~ ~ Z O i J s i PPS •M• uNO use raM b.d.a tOwlwiouo. to - 12 aw.uha wxn i .a. picas aiumr fiL16' ~vrtao5. plwnr nuror'ad w ~ n'exr of park.6g ww ~.y ~ kwa ~~ mrana~ IINiW gymplpgK CIOff y~/~{~~~a~~L ~~. yr.. ~~ ~ ("" ~_J (iil6l CM r{HMV {~WI~. uamW IORO. f11910h! YILLI//mllliA. N"/We g4rrtl~r py~~q J ... ..r.... ..~..~ 1~dt oLY[ry d0(ipMUJ"i, .ury~~ ~dq(~ Gsmye SaGtek : ase ry~nial ~iaragr Seduek Jemidu.ds Smrt Otu ow !w-aL rgy{s n fiMsr ratl/s ax prav~s :onnh+ilty wiik ndj~reno ;awc xur. L,wdr,~Ji+~a0~tnt auY~as m aarj~. rcrsw 22e A ~ImGI rwwAo.q h.. ws Ewa oivy ow diaeu~c w(c al dit gps~e orgtryort. T1K yniwa you it iuwdly as Ws rov o f de .y, a .~ ~wlb ~,,,n-.a ek ~~ ~ l ni/p~>'a' au pokby ~, ~. g ~ aifsaa/b, <ws aids a!u •r• urro use nr IoW W towMOUw to - tx awl Wb i yen RaR~~ h.wa ~C o~a.w a ¢~onorv a>tLa M dlc ~forytL Nv*Gy. lla .sVi p~lu-,...lfodl M.rkc nat Po tht ruin. yy'~~J~J ~'9r La+uf~p. o*aartnr nbfat m AuLjr• rerun'. 4~ .$CLCM1 /1V,tti J TrwZ,nyttrv co~wsu mpui. o s~f ~1 ,wra SP~+~ ~ aPnMrart ,u omy g.~l. 227 'MY LAND USE faxplxx o a~al ~- 72 - 14 daNlNq uMls / aGN T1rs ~I'cp u annrva/ad wilt wlrJs• reKruL twr*Gr9 4rtigv6 ar are GttgrxL fartcf roe ¢ dwI!!y iwrt b.J4+q. Grrarhxltr ymnA< nc~ (or.wL atuer m tlw dwr. ~y,~wx.uy ~,..~d. ctr4n,,.,,./ eayu~ eraa {~ vKatr: w.k.ay V~wfa Rubuy p4wry c~ re bw7d[uy WaFr way rawvct datlL(xgr ro naN., muZ, opueaPgtt nenrnrk see T %8$$888888888888$8888 ~ n -_-__~~An~'_________________ x .. w ~a ~ $ 5~ -----~ro-------------"------ ~ti W r --5-----~~--------------~-- ~ a o~8 ~ ~ a ~ ~~ ~~ ~ x~~ ~~~ a ~~~ j ° ~ a~ ~ ~ ' 5 ~ E ~~~~ ~ s~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~I ~ " RESOLUTION N0. 88-u6 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 88-02 TO MODIFY THE LON-MEDIUM AND MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS NHEREAS, on the 13th dqy of April, 1988, the Planning held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following~ndTngs: 1. That the Amendment will provide for development of a comprehensively planned urban community within the District that is superior to development otherwise allowable under alternate regulations; and 2. That the Amendment will provide for development within the District to a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth management oolicies of the City; and 3. That the Amendment will provide for the construction, improvement, or extension of iransporucion racm tres, public utilities, and public services required by development within the District. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this pro ec w not create a significant adverse effect on the environment and recommends to the City Council the issuance of a Negative Declaration on April 13, 1988. NON, THEREFORE, BE [T RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Terra Vista Carsvunity Plan Amendment 88-02. " 2. The Planning Commission hereby recamaends that the City Council approve and adopt Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 88-02 to modify the Community Plan per the attached Ordinance. 33S PLANNING CpMISSION RESOLUTION N0. TVCPA 88-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA April 13, 1988 Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF APRIL, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION Oi THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON6A t ~ , I, Brad Buller, Beputy Secretary of the Planning Caawisslon of the City of Rancho Cucaagnga, do hereby certify theL the foregoing Resolution ws duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Co~lsston of the City of Rancho Cucaaanga, at a regular aeettng of the Planning Caneisstan held on the 13th dt4y of Apr11, 1988, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMYSSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, TOLSTOY, EMERICK, CHITiEA NOES: CCiMISS10NER5: NONE ABSENT: CgAMISSIONERS: MC NIEL 3 ~/ - CITY OF RANCH(> C1;CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 4, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Robert A. Rizzo, Assistant City Manager BY: ,Terry B. Fulwood, Resource Center Coordinator <ti "s;, Vii' .x. SUBJECT: Approval of Resolution Confirming Amended Assessments for the Storm Drain Channel Assessment District 8b-2) For the Lot Line Adjustment for APN 261-271-77, APN 201-271-72 and Tract Map 12873 P,ECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that City Council approve the Resolution confirming the amended assessments at the close of the public hearing. EVALUATION: The Street and Highway Code Part 9C, Section 8730 through Section 8734 under Division of Land and Sond provides procedures for the apportionment of assessments necessitato~ by the division of land. The attach oa °._„piuu on confirms the amended assessma~tc L..iiowing the close of the public The Public Hearing Notice has been published twice in a local newspaper as specified in the Streets anfl Highway Code Part 1C, 5ectio^ 8730 through Section 8934. Respec (f timl d, Robert A. Rizzi~~ Assistant City Manager RAR:JBF:sgr :+*rac.^.msnc: Resolution Confirming Amended Assessments Reapportionment and Redistribution of Assessments 33~ RESOLUTION NO. O 6 ~O/ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUPlCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCRMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PINAL REAPPORTIONMENT REPORT AND CONFIRMING AMENDEC ASSESSMENTS FOR THE STORM DRAIN CHANNEL (ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86-2) FOR THE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT FOR APN 201-271-71, APN 20;-271-72, AND TRACT MAP 12873. WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has nrevio_sly c -fire,md assessments in a special assessment district pursuantyto the terms and provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and bonds were issued to represent the costs For unpaid assessments pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Improvement Hond Act of 1915", being Division 10 of said code, said special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86-2 (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District") and, WHEREAS, subsequent thereto, certain lots and/or parcels of land upon which there are unpaid assessments have been aPPortioned or divided, and this legislative body did receive a Reapportionment Report and proposed amended assessment and did set a public hearing on the amended assessment, all as authorized pursuant to the provisions of Part 10 of the "Improvement Hond Act of 1915"; and, WHEREAS, at this time all notices have been given as required by law; all persons interested in the original assessment. nr i~ «n., lanAc ~faen«..? _,--=Lr, ~~ iu cne bonds eeCUred thereby, did at the time of the public hearing, hear and determine all objections to the division of the assessments, and, this legislative body is now desirous to proceed to confirm the amended assessments. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. That the amended assessments contained in the "Reapportionment Report" are hereby approved and confirmed by this legislative bofly. SEC'P ION 3. The City Clerk shall, immediately upon adoption of this Resolution, cause the EullOWi rg; A. File a copy of the Amended Assessment Report, as confirmed, with the County Auditor, who shall annually thereafter enter upon the assessment roll the installments coming due on each component part of the original parcel opposite a description of the racpective parcels so assessed. 33g CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 86-2 May 4, 1988 Paqe 2 The amount charged for fees and costs as shown on the amended assessment es to each parcel shall be entered upon the assessment roll and shall be collected along with the first installment of the amendwrl asses s:roat, C. All amounts collected for fees and costs of the reapportionment shall be deposited in the General Fund of the City. The amended assessment toll and diagram shall immmediately be filed in the Office of the Superintendent of Streets, A copy of trte amended assessment diagram shx1l immediately he filed in the Office of the County Recorder, and said amended diagram shall cross reference the original assessment diagram for the Assessment Dietrlct. Said amended diagram shall contain the information as set forth in Section 8734 of the Streets and Highways Code. 3 3y ----- CITY OF RANCHO Cl'C:AMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 4, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer f Di: 8arrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION APPROVING TIME ~ EXTENSION F R TENTATIVE TRRCT N0. - CRISTIANO - A cus om o rest en a su v s on o o s on approximately 85 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (less than two dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of Haven Avenue north of the Hillside Drainage Channel (Deer Canyon Drive) - APN 201-121-24 i I. RECO!lENdlTION• Staff recommends that the City Council sustain the Planning Commission's action and approval of a time extension for Tentative Tract 12332, II. ABSTRACT: ine reasons stated in the appeal of the Planning Commission action are: 1. The lack of adequate "secondary" access, and 2. The street design Sn the project. A copy of the appeal letter is attached for your reference, following Exhibit "E". Ill. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract 12332 (containing 204 lots on 141 acres) was initially approved by the Planning Commission on May 11, 1983. Phase I (Tract 12332-1) containing 53 lots was recorded in August 1984 and tha ctrvnt< fnr that "vha32 %ere Lunitr uLted ShnPiiy tnereafter. Individual custom homes are currently being constructed on a lot by lot basis. The original Tentative Tract Map was allowed to expire by the Developer. R resubmittal approval for the remaining 151 lots was approved by the Planning Commission on February 12, 1986 for an initial period of two years. The applicant requested the first of three possible one year time extensions {until February 12, 1989), and received approval by the Planning Commission on March 9, 1988. 3 ~d CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 12332 - CRISTIANO Mar a, 19es PAGE 2 The time extension was submitted to the Planning Commission on January 27, 19A8, and was continued until March 9, 1988 to allow staff time to prepare a response to concerns expressed by homeowners within the first phase of the Tract, The concerns are summarized as follows: A. Street design within the project including: 1. The reduced width of the east-west collector streets, 2. The humped design of some street intersections, 3. An apparent inconsistency between the street Layout within the first phase compared to the balance of the tract, and B. Additional "Secondary" access IY. ANALYSIS: Street Desion• 1. Street Nidths: The homeowners requested that the main collector streets within the Tract be increased from the approved width of 32 feet to the City local street standard of a6 Poor The screeis wmcn are 32 feet wide are shown by a dashed line on Exhibit "C". A11 other streets are 36 feet wide. The streets which are 32 feet wide and posted for no parking on both sides will provide Netter traffic flow than 36 foot wide streets with parking, because there is a wider travelled lane width and less "side friction" caused by parked cars. This parking restriction should not cause a parking deficiency, because no lots front on these particular streets. The other streets are sufficiently wide for parking on both sides, and the lots are large with long driveways. 2, Humped Intersections• The homeowners expressed concern for the apparently exaggerated hump on the downhill (south) leg of the streets intersecting with the main (east/west) collector streets. These humps were installed as a drainage control measure. For the developed Phase of the Tract (TR 12332-1), the design provided for the cantatnment of drainage within the east/west collector streets by preventing it from entering the cul-de-sac streets. This was accomplished by raising the entrances to the 3~/ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 12332 - CRfSTIANO MAY 4, 1988 PAGE 3 col-de-sacs, which, in conjunction with the steep street grades, resulted in Lhe exaggerated humps. The conceptual grading plan for the rest of the project does not propose this scone design and shows a more gradual intersection Slope. 3. str ^t 'aycu t• One resident expressed the opinion that the street layout for the undeveloped portion of the tract is inconsistent with the existing port ion in that the existing portion consists of short col-de-sacs where the other portion has a rather long loop street. The question then becomes, does this difference make the two portions inconsistent or does it add an acceptable amount of variety. The Planning Commission felt that the design was consistent. Additional "Secondary" Access: The homeowners requested that an additional access be provided from the easterly portiai of the proposed Tract connecting to some street other than Haven Avenue to serve as an additional secondary access in the event that Havert Avenue is made impassable. The pro~iect currently has two street connections to Haven nrenue ~iacxsiern xreec ana Htngstern Drive). These two connections were required to meet the Development Cnde requirement for two means of access when the project was originally approved. Circumstances have not changed from the original approval; therefore, additional access points were not required for the new approval in February 1986 nor for the current time extdnsion. The current two access points provide adequate street capacity to serve the traffic from the 53 existing lots (Phase f), the 151 lots proposed for the rest of the tract, and the 42 lots master planned for the triangular property to the north. However, prompted 6y the homeowners' concern, the Planning Commission did instruct staff to investigate the Possibility of prcvidinq an additional access rnutn to fhe project area. Staff developed the Area Circulation Plan shown on Exhibit "D" that will eventually provide an additional access for the project area. The plan proposes that future streets will be extended from this tract northerly to the vacant triangular property and easterly though the vacant Fioad Control District (SBCFCO) property, then southerly across a bridge over Hillside Channel to connect primarily to Wilson Avenue with a secondary connection to Hillside Road. The 3 y~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 12332 - CRISTIANO MAY 4, 1988 PAGE 4 construction of the future access will be a requirement of the development of the triangular property, the SDCFCD property, and the vacant property south of Hillside Channel. This access is not intended to be used for regular traffic from Tract 12332-1 and 12332, therefore the connecting streets will 6e gated and only opened for 2mEr ycn 41E5. The Developer of the property south of Hillside Channel has expressed disagreement with the proposed access through his property, However, this street connection is necessary to provide addequate traffic circulation for the area west of Deer Creek Channel, and to serve the SDCFCD Droperty to the north when it develops. These future streets will also serve as an emergency access for Tract 12332. The Developer of Tract 12332 has proposed a method of providing an immediate additional access for fire and other emergency vehicles (Exhibit "E"). It consists of a graded road from the northeast corner of the proposed tract easterly across the SDCFCD property, then northerly adiacent to the west side of Deer Creek Channel to an existing bridge over Deer Creek Channel (used for Flood Cen±rel and utility company access}, then easterly Cross the bridge, and then southerly using the existing paved Flood Control access road ad,j scent to the east side of Deer Creek Channel to Highland xven ue or tfanyan Avenue (which is scheduled to be constructed in the near future with an approved Tract). At the time of the Planning Commission meeting, the Flood Control District had expressed concern with liability for this route; however, it nav appears that this concern can be resolved by the Developer posting a bond with the District. Respe tf y submitted, ~f RHM:B Attachments Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Map Exhibit "C" -Narrow Streets Exhibit "D" -Area Circulation Flan Exhibit "E" -Additional Emergency Vehicle Access Appeal Letter Foothill Fire Protection District Letter Planning Camnission Minutes Planning Conmisison Staff Report 3 ~!3 SITE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGDIEERIIdf} DMBION ~l °/j= Z~~OL~V V PPE~I; TT 1 Z 33,Z APPEN TITLE: VlC/N/TY ~IAP A 3 ~~ LEGlND ~~ I~IIT/M~ lTnf(Tfr CNnNNIy (r[. - - wrane sTn(pa ••r••• nf(w (wnenwgf ~ O v 5107 E5 ._ ~ ~: ~ __-_.. Y i x(;71" rt Yet ~`~~.-ta ~'~,'` !.'Sr ~ y ~ G ~1 ".lp rib ~ +i A:` 1R4 i /tit"~ 'i ;Re '~. ~• 7C ~. ',t''~jry/~ `r~ ,',X '-- '`L Z Tra ~'r `.'S ~ '. ". ._ Y."t•4ur ,y •y r a. ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~i a ~ .7. ~_ ~. :: °_ Inc a"ori,.,: ~ ..:•~4 ~ h' '~''r ~ ^~~ is e ~r Si ~<.~ ~. I i T~. • ~. .,rte/~.. t• F !7/'~ ~ y ..E, e l .t~•r~• .. ~ / Q b , -~ .~ _~.,, _~ ,./~ ` '..~'` ~ i _' ~r~`--~ ~ -~ r ~_.__!.._.i ar M 8 ~ ~ U t ~I ~ ~ F. 1 t ~ ~,~ 1•~a ~; ;x~ ~ „/~ ~: J 4 Q ~ /y~ ~ W N L V ~_ I~ F/ Q U ~ O U ~ z ~, U ~ ~ R ~ -~ - - ~`~ .. ____. ( Q~f s11 Q~I~a 1~Q i t s1 8 Sx.~~r ., _.._ _.~__ - i i 1' fret 7. !r ~ ~~. ~ /~~~~~/~f J _,}~~. ~^ `- s Y ~ ~y1 `'i ,,`"_ Y~.~~. ~'.Q CPC ~* =.y~l t-.: y~'..~ ;'Ia. / - ,` 1 ~ _ r.~ ` i ~ a ~ . ^ IF nn 1.J~ ~I i ~ E ~ era ~ r e t e~ j '' n ~1r ,~'e ~ ~:,tl nyP!£e a .r lc Y. •~~ / • w~i N ~s I, t ,, _ ~~t` "IM~.ti ~ ~~.f; ' /` ~ Y1 `8 V Ili F. «7 i' i !q'I ..Y •S~ ~ .• ' j f. l\~n'•.,F tl. ti. ~.~ i M 1 ise C Q r P- Mq ~] ' ~I 1 t y I~ " ~ n1 J 1 £~ ~QDy U C urrurv s~s~Manrt" LEGEND r%iSTIN® sTArrTl, cNANNIiS sTe. - - FGTUII H !TRlEPS •• • • • • ARrw e04NOAA/aa l Na \/~ r ~ 1 IANYAn JT SM N6 ~ - ~~~ l r V N Cam' OF ~(; TT/2332 RPP~AL RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLES AREACiRCU~.fTlON PLAN Frr~ ~ ~, nrv -, 3 ~ 7 ~cl~rr:, ~ ltiSTiN6 OR/DBE urrur/ agwwr {~~. jam.. ..... ~~~',,~~,~,~~~~ ~3/TE _, ~; T, ~,~ r~ ;; t ~~.__J ~IIIMiY OILIII p ; 'M ,~ ~ ~~ J l ~ }I ... LE6EN O: ~~ IllfilYl IinII.1~ fn/nF/U I/f. /Y tY11( fin//iJ ...••. nn~ /mnanan CITY OF RANCHO CUCt1MONGA ENGIIJEERIIVO DIVtBION 3y~ De7/ONQL l.MORG6NCY VBN/CLQ ACCCSS Ir~~^^10L1171 tt~~'V' Tl'EM: TT I ~ 3 3 APP~~L AGOeTeoNAL BwQAGCNCY 17TLF.: vitnreete ,tcc~ss Fx~srr: E :~.. - << . CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEM08ANDUM :, -- - - - - .._~~._. ....; :~a b~lY ~f RA ;•'^.NG CBCANONGA ENCINEEaiNC GIYiSIGN tl.ATE: March 10, 1998 T0: C1ty Cierk ~~~ ,i1_ FROM: Paula Uri811t, Councileaeher ~,"`/7_(j"y SUBJECT: TIME E%TEMSIOM FOR TEMTATIYE TRALT 12332 - CRISTINq I hereby appeal the daelflon of tM Plaenin8 W~Iisslon to grant a tier e~ftans/on (or TeMatiw Tract 12332. TM fwfona for fpr 1npe~1 an the lack of adegwtt fatondary atceta and street deel8n prolact. Plasa Schedule tA1s itM for C1ty Council rrYiar. PM:kck cc: City Council r, r~ r.:~~y:~ P. O 90% 7S .6617 AMETHYST 9i.. 9ANCH0 fUCAMONGA 91701 17111 997.4575 April 15, 1988 County of San Bernardino Department of TransportationlFlood Control ATTN: Charles Laird -Assistant Director 825 East Third, Street San Bernardino, CA 92415-0835 Subject: Request for Joint Use/Emergency Access RE: FC, Zone 1, Deer Creek Channel 6 Parcel 5 -APN 201-121-01 Oear Idr. Laird: I have recently reviewed Tentative Tract 12332, which is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, for emergency access as seen on Exhibit "A" (attached). This area h protected by the Foothill Fire Protection District. in iign[ of my review, I am requesting Joint use of your access facilities to accommodate an alternate emergency response into this development. The proposed access generally begins at Highland Avenue, continues northerly along the east side of the Deer Creek Channel asphalt patro! road approximately 2.2 miles to the existing power line road bridge, crosses the bridge, continues southerly along the west side o` the Deer Creek Channel graded patrol road approximately 1,400 feet, continues westerly across Flood Control District property (Parcel 5, APN 201-121-01) in the form of a new graded 26 foot wide access road, and westerly through the proposed development to the existing terminus of REngstem Road. I believe in addition to providing an alternate form of emergency access to the existing and proposed devel9ptnsnt, the (Ere Break created by the prep^sed graded access roatl through the project will benefit the existing homes in the area. I will appreciate your expedient cooperation in the review and approval of this request, in light of the fact that a City Council hearing is scheduled for early May on this item. ~~ County of San Bernardino April 15, 1988 Page Two Should you have any questions regarding this request, please contact me at (714) 997-2535. I sincerely appreciate your quick consideration of this matter. Yours very~~tr~ul/y, rjJ~G~,sw~+,~~u,.,.. Lloyd B. Almond Division Chfef/Fire MarsMl LBA/ss attachement cc: Jack Lam, Dlractar of Community Development/Rancho Cuumaga e Ken A. Mliler, Director Transportation/Flood Control Robert Stolomaysr, TM Cristieno Company ~/ OLD BUSINESS H. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12332 - CRI STIANO - A custom lot res en a su .v s on o o s on approx ma e y 85 acres of land in the Yery Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located an the asst side of Haven Avenue, north of Hillside Drainage Channel - APN: Z01-121-24. (Continued Prom February 24, 1988). 8arrye Hanson, Senior C1vi1 Engineer, presented the staff report. Coaeissioner Tolstoy questioned Engineering if 1n the future the triangular piece should be available and some one else should acquire it, will 94 lots be able to financially support a crossing of the channel. Mr. Hanson responded that it can occur. Cowaissioner Blakesiey stated the exhibits show a street coming out of Tract 12332 that ends in a cul-de-sac and 1f this develops, will there still be the avallaDility for access. Mr. Hanson stated there would be. 8111 Silva, Deputy City Engineer, added Lhat it would be fully Improved to the tract bou~ary, both street extensions t0 the east would be extended to the limits of the tract. This would be curb and gutter and paving. Chairman McNiei opened the public hearing. BoD Szalomayer, representing Cristtano Companies, 4400 Mac!lrthur Boulevard, Newport Beach, stated they have tried to mitigate the issues that were discussed at the last meeting. They are in agreement with the staff report. Bruce Ann Hahn, 5087 Granada Court, Atta Loma, stated there are several concerns of the homeowners regarding the access, The/r maJor concern is emergency access and she feels this has not been solved. The triangular piece at the top would have to be developed before the condition of access would be answered and there fs no tract map on that piece. The wedge piece would also have to be developed and this has not been sold by the Flood Control District. In the reports; Associated Engineering `•l ked Gaut iWe emergency access ai ternatives. There 15 an existing bridge at the top so residents could possibly get out and go northerly across the existing bridge and come down the Flood Control District's easement on the other side of the channel. However, without emergency access easement, emergency access is still the maJor concern. After speaking with the fire department, Ms. Hahn stated they, too, would like to see an emergency access to the east. She questioned Engineering if there are plans to extend Milliken. Planning Commission Minutes - 1 - March 9, 1988 35~ Hr, Hanson stated that the bridge is used by Southern California Edison and Los Mgeles Water and Power. However, the difficulty with it is getting frw this tract to it. There are saes easeeents concerns and the actual usability of the facility. It does not look particularly viable but has soee potential in an extrcee eeergency, core so for eeergency vehlcies to get in and less feasible for residents getting out that way. Froe Haven, you could get there; it is a gravel road however. Regarding the progress on Milliken, the property to the east of Deer Cnek Charrwl tz owned by the Flood Control District and Engineering feels it is highly unlikely that Nilltken will be developed straight north as shown by the developer's engineer because of the restrictions on the property on that side of the channel, it eay curve to the east. The flood Control District has not declared that property surplus so Engineering has no idea when or if that will happen. If tt does, it will be a ouch scalier street than Milliken south to Mil son. Marc Roy, 5068 Calypso Court, Alta Loew, stated that as the tract cap 1s presently designed 80-85 percent of all the traffic to the west will have to exit on Rtngstee as a natural course of traffic flow which Beans according to the Traffic Departeent of 3300 trips per d{y. This is going to create saeee traffic circulation problees. The present developeent and the part to the east is drawn in a whole series of sea11 cul-de-sacs of 15 lots per cul-de-sac. !n the back part of the cap, there is no consistency of the protect with what was designed or developed in the front part of 1t. instead of having short cul-de-sacs, there are soee cul-de-sac but an extreeely long, winding road with 30-50 lots on them also adding to the congestion. In reference to the traffic flow and consistency throughout 411e tract cap, the residents mAA 1~4- _ " ~- """ s:~.k...y ~l ae ,tune. They wou i a a I so I ike to see soeething-definite on easeeent agreeeents. They would like to see soeething fine that says that at this particular point in time the people who live there could exit at certain exits when there is a problee. Larry Clark, 6728 Teak May, Rancho Cucaeonga, stated he supported Mr. Roy's coeeents. The residents would like to see an ability to exit through the east side to balance the traffic flow and the proposal doesn't afford this capability, The current developers arc reluctant to build the bridge and provide the access. The problee will be eagnified in years to coee. Frank Militaes, Associated Engineer representative, 316 East "G" Street, Ontario, clarified they fas the developers) understood that abiH tv far the ad~aceat propercies to support the construction of the bridge ivouid include a third property, the property south of the Hillside Channel. They understood that all three properties would trigger that circulation element. Regarding eeergency access, extensive discussions with the Flood Control District, the Bureau of Power and Mater, and Southern California Edison have been held and though they have not said it can not be done, it is a longterm process and there are no guarantees. The Flood Control District is very reluctant to grant access unless somebody Dlanning Commission Minutes - 8 - March 9, 1988 353 other than the Flood Control District assuws the iiability for the use of the access. They do not view a developer or a hawowners association as a proper party to assuak liability. They look to the City to assume that liability. Ms. JoAnne Knatther, SOB3 Bram6)e Court, AI La Low, CA, stated her concerns regarding the access roads, traffic floc, and the high crowns in the streets. Hissm Durrani, resident of Haven view Estates, slated he concurred with Mr. Clark's comaents and stated that the City should have initially reviewed these wtters when first approving the plans. Chalrwn McNtel closed the public hearing. Chalrssan McNTeI clarified the three issues Deforo the Co~isslon were: 1) emergency access, 2) intersection visibility on north-south streets, 3) street widths. Ca~issloner Tolstoy stated because of the length and rldth of this tract, he felt them should be soar type of aaergency access. Further, he felt that the drainage 1s quite a problem on the north-south streets and soar other mitigation wasuros other than the crown :hold be considered for any new construction. Mr. Nanson stated that there are cdamrnts 1n the resolution to try to spread ar cake the hoops wider but this runs the risk of caking very steep streets aM this needs to be looked at very carefully. fnwa/lei nn.. Tnt afnv e~a~.A .w.• _+.__ .~_-- a yi itv ie aNOCH, LIR only way to wake them safer 1s for~the-howowners association to put stop signs on the existing streets. The City doesn't have ,lurlsdiction over that. Coamissioner Chitiea stated she agreed with Caarissioner Tolstoy regarding that soar type of eaergancy access should be provided, Regarding the visibility in the crown of the rwds, she would like to see sow different design used and possibly four-way stops at those locations where there myy be a problem. Chairwn MCNieI requested clarfficatlon of access easements. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the developer has atteapted to acquire emergency access easewnts across the Flood Control property but have open fnln n ...1... r4. ., ... . as ,,,~ b14J wools to take responsi biiiry and liability for that access. Coraissioner Tolstoy stated that though economics are important to the developer, but the money needs to be spent now and not later for a direct, positive exit from this pro,)ett to the east. Planning Commfssion Mfnutes - 9 - March 9, 1988 3s~ Chairman MCNieI questioned if the south side of Hillside Channel was developed? Brad Buller, City Planner, stated yes and no, the property immediately south of this proposal and west of the easterly property line of this tract is currently being developed, but southeast of this Drolett is vacant and no formal application for development has been subri tied. Commissioner Chttiea questioned why the City would have to accept liability for tt~a access and why not the homeowners essoCiattonl Ba rrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, stated this is a requirement of the flood Control District. Coa~issioner Emerick stateC there is a condition in the resolution that requires the developer to design a cut-de-sac at the southeast corner of the tract with both a turnaround and an access to the property to the east as approved by the City Engineer. Brad Buller, Ctty Planner, stated that the matter Lrofore the CamsHssion tonight 1s the extension of the map. 7hs Flood Control District east of this map 1s the key 1f emergency access to the east is required at this tick. Nlthout Flood Control cooperation emegency access to the east au4y not be possible. Chairman NcN1e1 stated the Flood Control people are not going to grant an easement without the liability transfer. Brad Buller, Cf ty Planner, added if access is remulred. Flood Cnntrnl .1yt: ~a nwrt a likely to grant easement across their property if the request was only for the southern tip of their property. If an access easement is required fray the north t0 south along the entire length of the Flood Control property, it can De expected that Flood Control may be a little more reluctant to granting an easement. Commissioner Emerick stated that it was unfair to expect taxpayers to extend the City's liability to ensure Ingress and egress over County Flood Control land for the benefit of residents who reside on private gated streets. Ralph Hanson, Deputy Ctty Attorney, stated that conditioning the map with off site improvements across property owned neither by the developer or the C1fy creates a problem. It is not a valid idea to put a condition on the aap. A probltm arises. mo; •h-n the Pity acqui~<; through eminent domain an action which is already public land put W a public purpose. This relates to the willingness of the Flood Control District to cooperate. Commissioner Emerick shared the City Attorney's legal concern that a private developer's right to develop his land cannot be conditioned upon the occurance of events that are outside of his control. Casaaissioner Emerick stated that Haven would be heavily impacted in the event of any Planning Commission M{nutes - 10 - March 9, 1988 ass esergency, fire, flood, or earthquake. He also stated that swny of the potential disasters, i.e. ft re, flooding, would cose froAt the north and east aM therefore was not sure esergency access to the east would be a good solution. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated currently there is no esergency access to the east across the Flood Control land unt11 you get down to Highland. Cosssissioner 8lakesley state6 he agreed with Cow•issioner Esrrick and Ralph Manson that there isn't a way to obtain an access and action should be on the srtter presented. Chairswn MtN1e1 rcoptned the public hearing. Frank Ni111ase, Associated Engineers representative, clarified that when the developer srt with the Flood Control District on the easwent issue, they asked the Flood Control District what would Mppen if the developer graded a road across their property to tM gravel red along tM channel wh1cA exists. The Flood Control DistrlcL napaMad tMy would not prevent they to do so as long as the developer d d not put it in on Wp of tM levees or soaves other point of finger. They would regain the developer to gate the access to that red with soar fan of crash gate. Coarlssioner Chlttea raised concern that the Cosrixslon fight waive pu611c safety for the developsrnt of this laM. Bob Szolasi~yer, Crlstiano rcprcsentattre, stated the developer has made a forswl request to Deer Cnek to buy a lot far the purpose of access to LiK auu[n. ne oeiievea access LO the south through Deer Cnek would 6e of sutual benefit. They totally dented th15 request. They have tried many options. They would eprc than happy to provide a graded emergency access. Bruce Mn Hahn questioned what would happen if Crlstiano sold their property since Crlstiano does not build basks. How would this be conditioned? Chairvwn MCNieI stated development of the property would go through the C1ty's Design Review Process. Chairwtan MCNieI rcclosed the public hearing. co~issiener Eeh!rick morel approval of the resoiutfan, t~;sse.^.er Biakesely seconded the sgtion. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, BLAKESELY, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, TOLSTOY ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Planning Coarission Minutes - 11 - March 9, 1988 ~~ Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the Coseiission entertain einute action to direct staff to work with Flood Control to encourage theft participation 1n developing an access to the east. Ca~Tssloner Tolstoy stated that he felt the tract is a good design but public safety is core iagortant. • w t e + s MEY BUSINESS I. APPEAL OF THE UNIFDR n or>1 gn rogram within the AlU Loma corner of 19th Street ALTA --carried by the C1ty Planner for~the tenants pptng Center Located at the southeast e11an SLmet. Brad Buller, Ctty Planner, stated that staff is 1n receipt of a ietter withdrawing the appeal. 8:45 p. m. -Punning Commission Recessed 8:55 p.e. - Planning Coawisslon Recopvened DIRECTDR'S REPDRTS v. nULI1dM1L! StIBACKS NITNIN PLANNED COiBBINITIES K. MINIMUM UNIT SIZE FUR M1LTI-FAMILY DNELLINGS - City Council n a s u rev ew s ze requ ream s for multi-family dwe111ngs. Brad Buller, City Planner, presented the staff report. Cowatssioner Chitiea stated she felt it very desirable to bring the setbacks in conformance to the standards elsewhere in the City. The additional setbacks Wally add Lo a project. Comsissioner Eax!rlck stated the Design Review Coawittee was looking at an apartment complex and ft appeared tt be too close to the street with the units fal rtY close to nether .hizh a, v. ;t ,~ .,..i.,.,.. appearance. This is what spawned the Cwwlsslon to review the ietbacks for multi-family land uses. Commissioner Eakrick agreed with Comaissioner Chitiea's coswents. Comais sf oner Blakesley stated he felt uncomfortable with the 22 foot settrack on a major arterial street and felt the setbacks should be consistent with the Development Code. Chairman Mc Niel opened the public hearing. Dlanning Commission Minutes ~J _/12 - March 9, 1988 --- CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ,~ .., GATE: March 9, 1988 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barrye R. Nanson, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12332 - CRISTIANO - A custom lot res en a su v s on o o s on apDrox ma ely 85 acres of land in the Yery Low Residential Otstrlct (less than two duelling units Der acre), located on the east side of Haven Avenue north of the Hillside Drainage Channel - APN 201-121-24 I BACKGRDIIND On January 21, 1988, the Planning Commission reviewed a request Tor a time extension for the above-referenced protect. During the meeting, homeowners within the tract expressed concern about three areas of the tentative tract design: A. The width of the east-west collector streets, =. ~.~. ~~J6wcJ Jeaiyn of cne Street intersections, and C. Limited access to the tract. On February 24, 1988 the Planning Commission continued the pro3ect to provide staff more time to prepare a resRonse to the Homeowners concerns. II ANALYSIS: A. Street Mtdths: The homeowners requested that the main collector streets within the Tract be Increased from the approved width of 32 feet to the city local street standard of 36 feet. The streets wM ch are 32 feet wide are shown by a day..^.ed line on F:h ih it ^A", Al', Ct her streets are 36 feel wide, The streets which are 32 feet wide and pasted for no parking on both sides will provide for better traffic flow than 36 foot wide streets with parking, because their is less "side friction" caused by the parked cars. This parking restriction should not cause a parking deficiency, because no lots front an the Streets. the other streets are sufficiently wide for parking on both sides, and the lots are large with long driveways. 3.Sg PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRAL7 12332 - CRISTIANO COMPANY MARCH 9, 1988 PAGE 2 B. Humped Intersections: the homeowners expressed concern for the apparently exaggerated humps on the downhill leg of the streets intersecting with the mair, collector streets. As stated 6y the Deve low's ~nyineer (letter attached), these humps were Installed as a drainage control measure. For the developed Phase of the Trait (TR 12332-1), it was decided that 1t was a safer and more economical design to contain drainage within the main streets and prevent ft from entering the cul de sac streets. The only way to accomplish this was to raise the entrances to the cul-de-sacs, which, in con,)unctlon with the steep street grades, resulted in the exaggerated bugs. The conceptual grading plan for the rest O1 the pro~ecL does not propose LRts design. C. Access: The homeowners requested that an additional access be provided from the easterly portion of the proposed tract connecting to some street other than Haven Avenue 1n the event that Haven Avenue is nxsde impassible. The pro,lect currently has two points of connection to haven Avenue, therefore meets the intent of the Development Code regarding secondary access. Thes• rnnnartinw: r^rc„ ~:, ddeyuaie street capacity to serve the trafPlc from the 53 existing lots plus the 151 lots proposed by the rest of the development. The Staff recamnendation 1s that an additional access connection will not be necessary until development of Che currently vacant triangular property ad3acent to the Tract north boundary and the Flood Control District (SBCFCC) property ad3acent to the Tract east boundary (refer to Exhfbit "8"). A master plan showing L2 tots for the northerly property is shown on Exhibit "A", and a master plan for the easterly property showing 52 tots is shown an Exhibit "C". Access for further development beyond the boundaries of Tract 12332 tan be accomplished by extending streets from this tract northerly to the triangular property and easterly through the SBCFCO arooerty; then 5viit hef iv atr055 br~~-" .aye over hillside Channel to either Hillside Road or Nilson Avenue as shorn on Exhibit "8". The construction of the access will be a requirement of the development of the triangular and/or the SBCFCD property. Once constructed, this access can serve both Tracts 12332-1 and 12332. t~ PLANNING COM1I55ION STAfF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 12332- CRISTIANO COMDANY MARCH 9, 1988 PAGE 3 III. CONCWSICN: It appears that the toneerns expressed 6y the homeowners within Tract 12332-1 will be addressed by the administrative clarification of conditions of approval fnciude4 in the attached resolution. IV. RECpMENCNTION: Staff recomoends that the Planning Commission consider all input and eienw!nts on this Batter. If, after such consideration, the Coawission can support the recommendation of approval, adoption of the attached Resolution with a clartficatton of conditions would 6e appropriate. Respectfully submitted, t~an~ ~P, /r~e~ Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer NJ5:8RH:dlw Attachments: Exhibit "A" -Narrow Street Locations Exhibit "8" -Area Clrculattan Dian Exhibit "C" - cnrrrn orap.'r~~ ;;uaier vian Resolution of Approval Prior Staff Reports 3~d ~} - 3 "~' ~ "~ ~~,,. _ a~ , .. ~ o L ~ ~~ ~~ o IDs ~~.~ ~, ~ ~~,',~ f ~ m m~ ~~, ~ ~ . ~ t ,~y ,t, ~ ~= ~'~ ~•`r ~~~ 716`. ~ 'T R 'V Q' ~® ®t ~' ~ v ~ ti' n\ +t ri r +y it ~ Lr ~1 ~ ~ h1 ~ :, ~, ®' ~~ :: ~ .. m ~tF ?``1 : ` /~~ ~ ~ O r t 2 e B _ ~ ~I ~ ~~ ~"~ Z i 1 v, ~ 1i4, TT! 33z-/ ~~ ~ myr. y- ~ ~ ~~ I _~ 1 ~~~~ I 1 ~ Ss4h i I C) i ~I I TT 1233x' I t~ ~ 1 iS/41s ~ y o i 1 ~ 1 '- 1 v / ~ OMB ~'ti ` / ` _ 1 ~ 1 / ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~~ ~ \ s 1 ,~ ~~~~~I~, ~ Y 1 I 1 ~ ~ ~ H~7/ride vd. J i . 1 ~ wr/scn Ave LL'GEND; E~ESti'wy stntvts~ c1rsMMr/s etc. - - -~ - Future streets -- - ,brae ~K~~~~ -- --- ~ /V crrY of rl~: sr iz a3a N RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: Area C/rcu/m~Fir,~~ ENGINEERING DIVISION .3~ EXHIBIT; _ B 1~" ~~ , I I ;u - - -t /k!?P _ 1 _ _ I w~naa ruw aMOwwo r. -y ~ 1 1 INNN/ /~/M/ MN~MN/I ~/ /N /\~~/ ~Nf N~ _~-,j,Z-- moo, ,., ;1\a3, 1 ~7 _- .~1 __ -- ~ ~_a-' ~ r~ ~ ~ L-- -- , ~~ I _?y ~ I ,y ~ tt _J 4u ~-- ---t\ ~ ,-----~ ,1 ---~ ~ - I i }4 r-~----I , -~ i,v ~, ~ i ay ~Jro ~ j ~r~! ~4I~ ~_~ ~ ~~ ~4'll5 I ~ I ~ ~ 1->-TT_r-~~ . ~.L 1' i I i i ~H i~ i # Ii CI'T'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA srran~nvc~ Dtvrs~ox 3~ ^~ N 1TE1[; TT /Z33~' .7ACFC0 p%o~ y 1TTLE: Msai4r ~o/mri ~~ C RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION Of THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PIaNNING COMMISSION APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TAACT N0. 12332 A. Recitals. (i) The Cristiano Caepany has filed an appitcation for the extension of Tentative Tract No. 12332 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution. the subdect Time Extension request is referred to as "the aDPlication•. (ii) On March 4, 1986, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 86-23, thereby approving, subject to sDeclfie conditions and time limits, Tentative Tract No. 12332. (iii) A11 legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, detenatned and resolved by the Pianning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The previously approved Tentative Map is in substantial compliance with the City's current General Pian, SDeclfic Plans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes and Policies; and (b) The time extension of the Tentative Map wilt not cause significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, Specific Plans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes and Policies: and ;c) The tine extension of the Tentative Map is not likely to cause public heaith an safety problems; and (d) The time extension is within the time limits prescribed by state law and local ordinance. 3~~ ~-7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESO4UTION N0. TT 12332 - Christtano Company January 27, 1988 Page 2 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Cammiss ion hereby grants a Time Extension for: Tract licant Exp irattan 12332 Cristiano Lompany February 12, 1989 Su63 ect to the following admin!strat ive clarification of the condl ti ons of approval: 1. The 32 foot wide streets shall be posted for ro parking on both sides. 2. The downhill legs of street intersections shall 6e designed to minimize the effect of ro111ng the profile if required for drainage control. 3. The cut-de-sac street (Court H) at the xoutheast corner of the tract shall be designed with both a turnaround and an access to Lhe property Lo the east as approved by the Ctty Engineer. 4. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission sha13 certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED 7HI5 9TH OAY OF MARCH, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: tarry cN e , a rman ATTEST: ra u er, epu y ecre ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Pianning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of March, 1988, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: HOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ~~,~ ~^ CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONGA STAFF ftEPOftT DATE: February 24, 1988 TD: Chairman and Members of the Planning Com!ss!on FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner 1977 SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRA:.T 12332 - CRISTIANO - A cus om o res !n a su V s on o 0 5 On approximately 85 acres of land in the Very Low Residential OistrlcL (less than two dwelling units per acre), located on the east side cf Haven Avenue north of the H111s1de Drainage Channel - APN 201-121-24. I. BACKGROUND: On January 27, 1988, the Planning Coaw/ssion reviewed a reques or a time extension for the above-referenced pro,{ect. During the meettrtg, homeowners within the tract expressed concern aDaut three areas of the tentative tract design; 1. Limited access to rho rra rr 2. The width of the east-west collector streets, and 3. The rolled design of the street intersections. II. ANALYSIS: A. Access The existing homeowners of the tract felt there was, in essence, only one point of access into the site. Because both street connections Into the tract were off Haven Avenue, the residents were concerned that if Haven Avenue was to be blocked, they would not oe able to exit the tract bnn' wwrgenry veh iC125 wain v' not De able LO sexy! the residents. The residents felt that an access should be provided to the east, with a bridge over the channel, to connect to the extension of MTiliken Avenue. B. Street Widths The homeowners were also concerned about the width of the east-west streets that serve as collector streets for the *.ract. The private streets were originally dpDroved with a 3l° ,. i' ~, > ~' !, a F~, w rl.- PLANNING CDMMISSIDN STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION FOR TT 12332 - CRISTIANO February 24, 1968 page 2 32 foot curb to curb width which only alloys parking on one side of the street. The City standard for public streets 1s 3a feet curb to curb which allows parking on both sides of the street. fie real dents stated that the peveeent width should be increased to aw~et the City standard. C. Intvsectton Design The homeowners stated that the desigyn of saaw! of the intersections, particularly the doamh111 streets, M d not provide adequate sight distance visibility. fie downhill streets had been designed with a "huap" to prevent water Pram runningg down the cul-de-saes. N1th the roll in the street, visibility of oncoming traffic was difficult. The residents felt that a similar design should not De repeated within the reaalnder of the tract. II i. RECOMIEN4ATIDN: In order to allow the applicant and staff tine o rcsea ese issues, the Planning Caaaaisslon continued this item for four (4) weeks. On February 12, 1988, staff received ner lnfermatton from the applicant but has not had sufficient t1aM` to analyze the new wterlal. Therefore, staff retaaniends that this lien be continued for Lwo (2) additional weeks. Res ly s L t , Br r ' City P1 ner BB:SM;te Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Assocleted Engineers Exhibit "B" - Letter from Flood Control pistrlct Exhibit "C" - Site Ut111zatton plan ,.,~,.~y,,ual Grading Tian Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Master plan 3~ ~ ~~~~ Associated Engineers *~~~~ 0U Utl 'f !TREK • ONTAIIq, UUf011NIA •1)M • 01a1 NFNU MAW11D AOOREDa: -.O. gW Wta, ONTARIO, CA a17a/ February 12, 1989 Nr. Brad Buller Director of Planning City of Rancho Cucamonga 93a0-C Daaeline goad Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 gE: Tsnutive Tract 12332 6xnnsioo Planning Cosissian Coot iauanca Submittal Dear Nr. 6ullar: Pursuant Co our ratan[ wecing regarding eha Planning Coriasion's cootinuaaw of a consent ealaedar itm for [:tension of 7sncat iva Tract 12732, w hereby submit the following: A. Fou[ prinb of Tentative Tnct go. 12332 ravi Nd to illustrate Che approx imace location OE [vo poi nt^ of access. Condition of approval fur tr. 12332. Resoluc ion Ro. 86-23, Section 2, Engineering teem 7 wyui wa an ncceaa eel ement. B. Four prints of a meaCer plan showing potential development of chc edjaca nt property co the east owned by the San Bernardino County Flood Control DiatricC. Prior cu the development ot• the potential maaeer plan, it moat be de to mined lE: 1. Tha Plood Control District plena to uc ilize the property for its own purposes; (See copy of letter from the Plood Control District dated 9-22-87 included herewith) 2. if the Flood Control District would oFfec the property for as le; 7. lF the ultimate owner could obtai^. • Tentac ive Map for residential development, then the owner would have Co determine if; a. He could obtain ac ce as co Naven via Tract 12772 and Tract 12732-t via a joint use of access sgreeme nt, or; ~_~~ 3~s b. Obtain ncce sa to the seat or aouch by development of new roads and bridges. C. Four prince of the A.L.T.A. Survey plat marked to show the proposed location of an ems rgency acceu to the east frw Tenutive Tract 12332 co Gilson Ave. via the existing bridge and road on Plood Control Diat zit[ property. The eneeaient would •l low residents of Trac c• 12332 and 12332-1, during an emergency which blacked the Raven Ava ezit, co drive co the rent aide of the channel, then north on the gravel road to a existing bridge, then east acroen Che bridge, end aouch along Cha seat •ida of the channel to Gilaoa Ave. The easevent could also be used, 6y fire sad safety personnel, to bring equi poser to she tracts. Ge have been in coarse icat ion with the Sam barmardino County Plood Cant rnl Diacric t, Loa Aoge lea Department of Mater and Powr amd the Southarm California Edison Company to ioitiaq the procee of obtaining [ha nacsuary easemsmts from ooh gaocy. ID additioq, w have reque a[ad a latter from each agency rhich indicate the it position on Chis attar. Ac [hi• ciao, w have rata ived ao aaeurance they rill agree to Che proposed atmrgency access. It is cuacoury for each agency co have a normal caviar period for this type of easecent of two to four moneha. The Ploed Control District has informed us on easemamb wch as w have raq,.~~~_~, ::~_> : .eye i,c ,.i,e icy of Want no Cucamonga [o assume ail liability which could •r iae from [he see of chic coed. D. Four prints of re wised Site Utilisation Nap. E. One print of [he Plood Control District Right of Gay Map as info rmacion oo ly for your Rngineecing Department. In response [o Barrye Reaao'a request w offer [he Eolloring information: .\. The reduced roadway widths specifically on Tackatem Street, Ringste~s Sc rear, Celico Court and Bramble Court were approved by the Co®iaaion co transfer the normal parking area on [he unloaded side [o [ha lender aped eress. Theat a:reata should Katie Keen ooaced Enr no parking co accomplish this goal. lE ch is has not been done, re are witting co ass isc the ex isc ing homeovne rs in po et ing she existing sc rests. 9. The seemingly exagera[ed humps at south running Cul-de-Sacs was designed primarily as a drainage control eo assure that stu rs flows are di recced where they are supposed [o go. In steep areas runoff veloc it ie• are ao high ouch extreme me aaure• are neceaasry pset icuLrly when mass grading ie not being proposed, We understand cha plinnlOg Co~miaaion's concern about aafe[y isauss end hope ehac our reaponsas co your nqueat prove use Eul in satisfying those concern. If you have questions please call. Sincerely ASSCCIAT6D RNA Ii ~ INC. !rank &. Nilliau Tor: Cziat iaso Partnara 1 82-bbCl cc: Criatiano Part nsrs 1 ~-13 37a E3il3~N 13~1T j l1. ]S3 Sf I) i,~,OT CO. DE- P~l7iTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION/ ~,~~ ~K*~'MO«a FLOOC CONTROUAIRPORTS ~~` ~.~ nswcwowcsaseacr su ~ nW a..w . M a...w, cs ant-eEri . nui 7s1•iEOO -x ~~~ MICNAEt 0. WA4(UI //A~Ipl~ Oiiw~e. 6aptashsr 22, 1967 Fila, 1.500/2.03 71fe Cristiano Casspsniss 1100 Main St. Sate B IrviM, G 9271tl Attns Ibbart ~. bwiassya 6es FCD, Zoas 1, Dssr Crank Cbla+sl, !stool S. AFN 201.121-01, lbsalEls ~urplw. Ilse' M'. Ssolesrysr, ifr IIissriot~s lawstiptian into your rsawst to purohas tht alle~sot prapsrty rwsslsd that it is trswrssd h7 the Dtstriot~a Ossr f>rssk Chssnsl. D1N to oonditiaM that Nw rsasntly ohs W our attsntim no R'opal'tlsr m Dasr Crask an bsins oonsidsred for puDilo sacs. 71wrs ors wprelty studisr hais6 data, ey LM Distriot sEW the U.6. lrsy Carps of ~n{1MM'a, m tM whin Ossr Crask Tro,)set to dstsrwins the nsad to sttsxarts flow in Dssr Crssk Chrlawl. Until ._...~ rr .w... N..~~... ~>,~. !w+n.rtr Ott b ruLlnad ter muipls basin ~"+--"~. uas. If you have any Questions, plesa, contact Kan Millissu at (714) 387-7136. Yry tNly yaws, NM Q •~ Kan A. Millar, WL. Dlrsator•tlannln6 'Ransportatian/Plaod Control KM/KM/k ., 3 7/ ~ ~,.,,..; . i _ _ t b..Pl m0' ~~ ~ yr I I ~ ~~ di /~ ~~~ ,-ti., ~~ ~~ .~ ? i ~~ e ~ R ~ ~~~ ~P\, `•~~` , -- ~~.%~. .=ice, `\/ ~~`. . .. Z. ~ ~a _._-_-_--i_e-.~-~- -~~e .~-- a~a~'r ~ C_ CITE' (~ ITE.~I~ ~~_ R.~~~ CL.C~~b~.~ TITI.F aS_ /11f d1/~ L/LT/a•~ Pl.~.\\I.\G DI~'LSIO(~ EXHIBIT --~_ SC:ALt -ls 37a R 'e _~ CITti' (~' ITEM: ~~ R.-1~CH0 CLC~~IO~G:~ rITLF ~Pll~e ~rirL-~.tt- _ PL.~.\\I.\G DI\'LS-Qf~' E~HIRIT ~,Q_~.~LE ~-I!o 37`3 ~,. 1 ~y ~_~ ~i w-anw -uw swow~wo C1ii~i\l IYtYN Nii\NNYt YI SM I\NY CiItN\ l~ltllll \iNi lilt i1 tNtIi1N tNGt N. ~liil ___~~ . ~ ~, h ~! -- ----- ~ _J i ~~ ~i lam-. CITE' (~ R.~~CI-~O CtC~~tO:`Gl~ ~.i~~~~ a~~lsia: t~-~~ .•- ~' vt MtT ITE\I ~~1~.bZ TITI.F. -,~."W EXHIPoT ~ ~(.:.>Lt 37y CITY OF RANCHO C[JCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 27, 1988 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tw Orahn, Assistant Planner G~G.Np,~ ~~ ~ ' <~ ~~_ OY A III ~ 2 J 1977 SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12332 - CRISTIANO cus m o res n a su v s on o o s on approztmakty 85 acres of land in the Very low Residential District (less than two dwelling units per acre), locakd on the east side of Haven Avenue north of the Hillside Drainage Channel - APN: 201-121-24. BACKGROUND: Tenktive Tract 12332 (204 lots on 141 acres) aas or-i9inalTapproved by the planning CoA•lsston on May 11, 1983. The applicant recorded phase I (53 lots). Subsequently, the applicant received a new approval for the remaining 151 lots on February 12, 1986, which 1s due to expire on February l2, 1988. According to the Subdivision Map Act, a kntative tract map may be - crd:: cp ff.e ~~m~~ iruw cim daa or approval. Therefore, the applicantVmay request two additional dale exknslons, in one year increments, exknding the map until February 12, 1991. The applicant is requesting a one year time exknsion to expire on February 12, 1989. II. ANALYSIS: Staff has analyzeo the proposed Lilac extension and has comp~the proposal with the development criteria outlined in the Cfty's Development Code. Based upon this review, the project meets the Basic Residential Development Standards of the Development Code for tM Yery Low Residential Of strict except for the required minims lot frontage of 50 feet at the front property tine. this project shows 19 cots of the to tat 151 that have a lot frontage ranging from 40 to 48 feet. However, those 19 cul-de-sac lots average 31,516 square feet, over B,OOC square fact largFr 4.han the average size of the remaiM ng lots within the tract. This inconsistency is not considered to be significant by staff and would not significantly alter the development of the project. III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve a me extension through the adoption of the attached Resolution. ~~s ~-i ~ PLANNING LOaMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 12332 - Christiano Copany January 27, 1988 Paye 2 Resp ally su tted, rad u r City PI ner 88:T6:vc Attachaxnts: Letters froel Applicant Exhibit 'A' - Location 14p Exhibit 'B' - Tract Nap Exhibit 'C' - Equestrian Trails and Landscape Concept Resolution 86-23 Tiar! Extension Resolution of Approval .~ /.~° ~-~9 1~HE CRiSTIA1YO COMPANY DecemWr 2, 1987 Mr. Brad Huller Director o! Planning City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320-C Bagllne Road Rancho Cueuonga, CA 91730 SUBJECT: Request for one-year extenaSOn on Tentative Tract 12332 Dear Mr. Huller: We have just acquired the unimproved portion o! Tentative Tract 12332, and have contacted an enginaerimq company to eomplst• the rsquirsd work _to record a final may. In addition, we have begun our market rsaearch •!lort• to detsralne the type o! product moat eultabla !or the project, whleh we be Nava will ba vary eompatlbl• with the exisiinq davelopunt in the trot. 91ncs we have been into rmed by our eonsultant• char t~... ~. ...._... _.._.___ time to comp]ei• the above work before sxpiratSon ol•ih• Tentative Tract Map, we hereby request your sincere consideration in extending Tentative Tract Map 12332 for one year in order [or u• to complete our work. Enclosed Sa our 462.00 tiling !ae required for the Tentative Tract Map extRnsion request. Please !!1• this request today Sn order to be placed on the January 27, 1988 agenda. I! you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at anytiu. sincerely, THE.LJij STIANO COMPANY Robart.~J. 92olomayer RJS:cIs Enc,osure DOCrB0H5.-Extension-Rancho Cucamonga ~ -Za ~' Associated Engineers CONSUITINOCIVIL ENGINEERS SAN 9ERNARDINO OFFICE 199 W. HOSPITALITY LANE. SVITE 18 • SAN 9ERNARDINO, CA. 94108 (714) 899.0491 - .(' oecamber 15, 1997 :C, .- • Director of Planning ~ , City of Rancho Cucaamnga Ec ~ 1~~ 9340 Beaalina Road A~~ f`~ Alta Loma, CA 91701 ,'~'• ~ : ~,~ Rax Tantativa Tzact 13337 - Savenvier Batatw ' Deal NI. Buller: wa hereby request an axtention of the approval of Tantativa Tract 17333 - Xavmviaw Estates which ie des to expire in Hbruary. Please notify me if [hare is anything which would pzevent the granting of this firae extension. Thank you for your consideration on this matter. •s.J ~tul~' rVULS, ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, INC. /~ /19 .~cc~(,~ Phslip M. Douglas, P.E. PMD: sl cc: Mr. Wa1Nr W. Wband - WRL Corp, Mr. Robert Szolomayer -The Ch[iat iano Cu. Mr. Ptank Williams -Associated Engineers IODCariol ..y c• J. u, 92-66 t, " {' ' i~~~ .Cr,f' 'JryJ ~~ N Fh:ipFlp~~'0 CpCa~ ~ ~ry!;ir Yr,4 H -zl 376 ..~u ~s!1~ Si7E UTIL12AigN MAP TBNTAT!VB TRACT 12332 V~ \ORTH crrl~ ~F 3 ~y ,,I, y, R.-1 \'CF-f0 CL'C~ ~ YO\G.a ITE.\I M~ ~ Gh - ~ 2~/ n TITLE PL.\\'~1\C DI1'ISIn\ E~HIRIT: /4 ~ ,]~ SCALE 'r~Raet~.y iTl coe n ~.YYArI/~ tfGltT it;3L ;.,~ ..;~, ins=-~+~i ~ ~ ~ ', ~ ~`\ Ytk'F ~M! ~ :eNrerrve T.ACY X1772 \YN~TH ~~ It.-~\CE{O CL'G~~[(~~~(~,~ TITLE PL.\\',,\IiL DI1'L~K)\ ~ ~3EXIi1i11T --~-- X::\LE ~' ~ ~ • ~ a t "r/. 1 i. •1 1 ' t ___~ ~ _ ~ t i~4~~ I ~ ~'- -- ~ 'K'7.. ! ~ w t 1 .~ s a ` 7 j t t i _ __ - ~___ ~ ; f ~ ~ ~ i 1 tl s t t ti a i /, ~Ta i I~ ___ _. ,~~t t t t 5 ~ t ~4 t ~~ r. ~ ' 4 t ~~ Ie t t ~~~ / I // ~ , j R t r ~ s 1 '~ , 1 .~ 1 'II ~ t /. 0 r' + _ ' i - • t ~; ~ -- ~ ~ ~~ (C., ~ w i H y t .- 3 t ?t~ 5 ' + i ~' °- ~ I e ~ ~ , if a E +s ® ~ ! - , ~- ~E , , ., aryj~i't ~ i•~~I~~' f ~t ~~ ~ '4~F ~ 4 .-s_-wr: ~ ~ r-~ ~ ~ 1_ ~,r L! I ~~ OF ~~~ITE.\1: ~ Y X1~~'1~(N~- ~~~'~/~ R.~\~CNO CL'C:1~I0\G.-1 TITLf, ~~,~ ~ I-r~_ rtirr ~~~ PL:\\'\'I\G DI1'L~IO~ µ ~~~\IIIIUT L SC.~LE RESOLUTION N0. 86-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVIR6 TENTATIVE TRACT 12332. wMEREAS, Tentative Traet Map No. 12332, Mrainafter 'Map' sudnitted by Natter Laband, applicant, for tM purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City o1 Rancho Cucamonga, County of San 8arnardino, State of Calffornta, described as a custom lot developant into 1St cots, regularly came before tM Planning Commission for puD11e Maring and action on February 12, 1986; and MHEREAS, tM C1ty Planner has recomaMnded approval of tM Map subject to ail conditions set fortA in tM Engineering and Planning Dtvlslon'a reports; and MHEREAS, tM Planning Coewissien Ms nod and considered th! Engineering and Plam~ing 01v1ston'x reports and has considered Other evidence presented at tM public Maring. ROM, THEREFORE, tM Planning Caewlssian o1 tM City of Rancho Cucangnga does resolve as follows: ^..e ~. SECTS IOr :~-The Planning Canwisston makes tM following findings in -+- - •- • -•• •-- • • ~ n .r. in. ic.~.~c OnY Mf riap cnerlgr (a) The tentative tract is consistent with tM General Plan, Development Code, and sped/ic plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and spec if le plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) TM design of the subdtvlsfan is not likely to cause substantial envirommental damage and avoidable injury tO humans and wild l±ts os them habitat• (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) the design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acQuired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 3~~- ~~--~-~ Page 2 (g) Thai this protect will not create adverse i~glacts an the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12332, a copy of which 1s attached hereto, s hereby approved subiect to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. A signature slgnroff shall be contained within the individual homeowner CC i R's designed to alert the buyer as to the requirement for strNL tens, including maintenence. Prior to octupantY. street trees an6 slope plantings on individual parpls suet be inspected and approved by tM City. 2. Parkstrlp landscaping a~ street trees, with appropriate trrlgattan systems shall M required along streets •A• and •C•. TM required landscaping and street trees any b! added with each phase of street construction. 3. Ranted ground cover is required for slope bank erosion control when required by standard conditions. Nydrosaedin9 shall not be allowed h~~fuu n! ,w Y.. •n11 ENGINEERIiKi 1. Oedicatten of ingress and egress and maintenance easements overall interior streets shall be dedicated on the Final Map to tM City of Rancho Cucamonga EnglnaNng and Public Norks Divisions; the Cucamonga County Nater District; the San Bernardino County flood Control District; Southern Caltfarnta Gas Cospany; SoutMrn California Edison Casgany. 2. TM northeasterly portion of the project area (F1aod Control District Easamentl shall be rude a Dart of tree tract map. The CC i R's Ior this tract shall make provisions to incorporate this aree into tM Homeowner's Association once this area 13 developed. 3. An access easement by separate instrment shah be provided to the property lying east of the project area (owned by San Bernardino County Flood Control District). The document shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the District. This condition shall be waived if the access is not required by the Flood Control District. 7 G, N- - ~fo Page 3 4. The Homeowners Association established shall provide specifically Por adepuate funding for the future maintenance of the private roadways and the Haven Avenue landscaping. APPROVED ARD ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1986. PL,P CCNNTSSIOR OF THE CITY OF RANCia) CUCAMONBA 8Y• ~ik.riL! ~6'n~s J(Cf-JS,t~ou , a rma~n(~~j ATTEST: / `a+'~V-'-'~` ra er, uty n ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of tM Planning CamM salon of the City of Rancho Cueaennga, do hereby certify that tM foregoing Refolutton was duly and regularly intraduead, passed, and adopted by tM Planning Camw,lsston of tM City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular suetlnnqq of tM Planning Coanission Mid on tM 12th day of February, 1986, by tM following vote-to-wit: AYES: ~..~<. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CHiTIEA, MCNIEL, BA1lKER, RFMPEL, STOUT airi+riiiiiuneRS: NONE COMMISSIONERS: NONE ~ ~3gs~ v t77Y O! RANCHO CUCMfONOA n. oa. a. wr. ~r. o.vy, fu,,,, mw, nio m-~u i Janeary 29, iSMa Raeart StolaaR~yar c!o TIM trlstlano Caapagy 4400 MocArtlwr dird., Sa1tt 7BD Marport 9aaeh, G 92tNi0 SUIWECT: TIIE EKTEMSIOM Fql TENTATIVE TRACT 12332 . CRISTIAND GntlaRan: TM rlanain! Ca~laaton radarad tM aeow daaerthad Orolaet at LMir awatt of Jaawry 27, 1918. TM 11aRn1R/ Co~Htslgi teals Ro aetton at tAts t1eR, bet tnetaad eoRNnwd tlHa iqR to tIy wetiq of ialreary 24, 19RR. Ike aRatt~ rill M Mld at tM L1M'a hrt CaaatnNt,Y Cantor lacatad at 9161 9aNltna Road, Raneke CreaRenp and nlll ba9in at l:tNl p.n. if yoY haw a4Y Wastlona, plaaa hat fro to ull oar offtea at any t1ar. St ncanly, COMNUNITV OEYELOPIENT DEPARTMENT PLANNiMC DIViSIdI gran C, Kiasack Planning Ca~isaton Sacntary /kk J ~7 ~~~~ AFfInAYIT 4F 4SILllMi I, sA'l~.l~~.aa-~ Nall Clerk for the City of Rancho Cutamonga, do hereby swear that on /],jj/l,~ aS 198 A' at approximately f~: 3Q_ o'clock ~/Y~ (a.o~. or p.w.), I deposited in the Cucamonga Branch of the United States Post Office located at 9607 Business Center Qrive, a letter addressed to and regarding: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, CITY COUNCIL - MAY 4, 1988 AT 7:30 P.M, TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 12332 - CRISTIANO 26 NOTICES MAILED ~Gp SEE ATTACHED FOR NAMES AND ADDRESS AND PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Signed: /~ /~ ~, Opi.ia.,_ Date; ~~ a~S~~_ _ _~ (RETURN TO ENGINEERING DIVISION AFTER SIGNING) ~~ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RANCHO CUCAMONGII CITY COUNCIL The Rancho Cucamonga Punning Commission will be holding public hearings at 7;30 p.m. on Nay 4, 1988, at the Lions Park Coemunity Building iocated at 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, to consider the following described proiect: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION APPROYIkG TIME EXTENSION cus o rcs en a s v son o o s on appraximatety 85 acres of sand 1n the Yery Low Residential District (less than two dwelling units per acrc), located on the east side of Haven Avenue rrorth of the Hillside Drainage CAannel (Deer Creek Or1ve) - APN 201-121-24 Anyone having concerns or questions on any of the above lteaat are welcnaa en concacc me oicy engineering Division at (714) 989-1862 or visit the offices located at 9340 Base Line Road, Unit 8. Also, anyone ob~ec!ing to or in favor of Lhe above, may appear in person at the above-described meeting or may sudait their concerns in writln9 to the Engineering Division, City of Rancho Cucamonga prior to said meeting. DATE OF PUBLICATION Rancho Cucamonga City Council ate pr , 3 ~~ ANTHONY J. FIGRENZA CALVIN OLIVER BARRY SIBUL P 0, BO% 1302 8255 'JINEVA0.D 6222 SACRAMENTO CUCAMONG A, CA 91730 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 ALTA COMA, LA 51701 APN# 201-484-10 APN 207-494-22 APN 201-494-14 JOSEPH GARC iA IOSEPH STEPHEN DONALD BRIGGS 10261 PEPPER 337 W, BENNETT 2350 OA KL EAF CYN RD. RANCHO L'UCAMONGA, 91730 COMPTON, CA 90304 WALNUT, LA 91789 APN 201-484-09 APN 201-494-21 APN tot-a84-z4 CHARLES DUNLAP PAMELA ANDERSON JACQUELINE PARISH 60 E. FOOTHILL BLVD 5019 GRANADA CT, 2114 SATICOY 5T. UPLAND, CALIFORNIA 91785 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91701 POMONA, CA 91767 ArN .,. 4e4-.,~ „~~ ' 201-494-20 APN 201-464-16 EARLE KRUGGEL ALLAN HAHN RICKEY 5. ROSS 7360 ARCHIBA LO AVENUE 9910 LA VINE ST. 833 W, 115th ST. RANCHO CUCAHONGA, 97730 ALTA COMA, CALIFORNIA 91701 LOS ANGELES, CA 90044 APN 201-484-07 APN 207-494-19 APN 201-484-75 JACQUELYN PARISH JON R. YOUNG LLOVO MICHAEL 2114 SATICOV STREET 17578 HAWTHORNE 6320 HAVEN AVENUE POMONA, CALIFORNIA 91767 FONTANA, CA 92315 ALTA COMA, LA. 97701 APN 207-484-06 APN tot-494-18 APN 201-484-14 WILLIJ/•M RAWLiNGS RALPH LAIRD ALBERT G, SEGUV 6250 MARBLE LT. 1882 N. MOUNTAIN AUE L942 C.4CTU5 CT. RANCHO CULAM ONGA, 91701 CLAREMONT, CA 91711 RA NC HL' CUCAMONGA, CA 9170 APN 201-484-05 qpN 201-494-17 APN 201-484-12 JAMES BOiLEY TR LOREN GILES SR, WAVNE S. CAREV P.O. 80% 785 550 MARIPOSA ST. 1547 NE'dC OMB PL. ALTA COMA, LA 91701 UPLAND, LA 91786 CLAR EMONT, CA 91711 APN tot-484-04 qpN tot-494-16 APN 201-484-12 JOHN BARBEE GEORGE LIGHTNER RONALD VEIRS 1867 ELAINE WAY 390 N. EUCLID STE. 202 i2g69 SUMMITT UPLAND, CA 91786 UPLAND, CALIFORNIA 91786 ETIWANDA, CA 91759 APN 201-494-23 APN 201-494-15 0.PN 201-484-11 SAN BERNARDINO CO. F100D THE DEER CREEK COMPANY ° r'nuro ni roe v vX 4vu 825 EAST-THIRDyST. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 917G SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92415 3~~ ,.,~-I - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 4, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, C'ty Engineer 8Y: Judy A. Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide w~, SUBJECT: ORDERING THE YIORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 41 FOR TRACT N0. 12870, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHLAND AVENUE BETWEEN ETIWANDA AND EAST AVENUES, AND DR 87-16, LOCATED EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND NORTH OF ARRON ROUTE, TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 REC01lEN01[TION: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 41 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Repor*_. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS at}arhaA fnr rihv rm mrSl annrnval fe a roenlu4inn nrAurinn i6u wr6 in connection with Annexation Ro. 41 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 for Tract No. 12870, located on the north side of Highland Avenue between Etiwanda and East Avenues, and OR 87-16, located west of Etiwanda Avenue and north of Arrow Route. The developers of the subJect proiects have been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88-189. Respect.' submitted, _~~ RHM:JAA:sd Attachments ~3~9 RESOLUTION N0. 8 D ' a O A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 41 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT N0. 12870 ANO DF. 87-16 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Ranchc Cucamonga did on the 4th day of May, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 88-190 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 41 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 88-190 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the P,ffi davit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement', was duly and legally Dosted in the time, form, manner, location, and nunber as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and NHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly malted to all persons owning real property proposed to 6e assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88-190, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the smne appears on the last mailing or as known to the Cfty Clerk of the City vi nml,.ilu w~mvuya, nil ll.n ]GIII wyieO nOIO l1Y ly IIIaIICY III NIC LIIeC, IUflll, alto manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the ,f urisdicti on facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired ,jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Ccuncil of the City of Rancho Cucamo~liat the public interest and convenience Requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88-190, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; a~ SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's epor are hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said trot s ave been occupied. J yC~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 Mnexation No. 41 for Tract No. 12870 and OR 87-i6 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in coagiiance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Coda, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1912). SECTION 2. &neral Description This City Council has effected to annex all ner developments into Street Lighting Maintenance 0l strict No. 1. The City Courrcll has determined that the street lights to be mslntained will have an effect upon All lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Nork to be provided for with the assessments established by the district arc: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servlcina of street pent i~,y, u.ewen is on isag or streets (arterial and certain collector streets) as shown on the Lighting District Alias Mep which 1s on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benef/t to ail areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications the plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated 1n the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering 0l vision. Reference is hereby made to the subJect tract map or deveiopment plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and speClflcations for street lighting improvement on the i.^.dtvtdual developwvnt is hereby m.•d~ a part cf this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of ail or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subJect area. ~tii SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs wail be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. Ail improveax!nts will be constructed by deve)opers. Based on available data, 1t is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes wiil be as indicated below. These costs arc estlamted only, actual assessments will be based on actual Cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone i is comprised of street light improvements on mayor streets for residential improvements (single family, multi-family, condominiums and apartments) throughout the City. EatA dwelling unit in tA1s zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of ail industrial, cammerctai and institutional protects throughout the City. It has been detenlned that one acre of land in industrial, coawercial and 1nst1tut1onal areas derfves the same benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. ! 1s shown below: 1. S.L.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: No. of Lapps Lamps Mnex New Lamp Lean Size* YTD No. 41 Total ~tlWl 444 4 448 9500E 499 1 500 16,000E 16 0 16 22,OWL 4 0 4 27.500E 17 0 17 *HTgh Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual Lawn size Lamps Rate Mo's Maint. Cost 5800E 448 X f 6.93 X 12 ~ (48,007.68 9500E 500 X f10.16 X 12 60,960.00 16,OWL i6 X 512.08 X 12 2,319.36 22,WOL 4 X fi3,64 X 12 664.32 27,500 17 X 515.31 X 12 3,123.24 Total Annual Mai nt. Cost f116,074.56 2. Total Assessment Units: YTO Assess Units before this annexation 16,816 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 68 Total Assessment Uni ts 16,884 _3y~- 3. Cost aer Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost - 511556 ~ E5.82/year/unit o.o n s n src Assessaknt shall apply to each tot or parcel as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5, Assessaknt Dtaoram Loples of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled 'Street lighting Maintenance 0lstrict No. 1•, Annexation No. 41. These dtagraa are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Iaprovements for the District arc found to be of general benefit to all units within the Dlstrtct and that assessment shall be epual far each unit. Nhen units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per neL acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Prcllminary Approval of City Engi~xer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a Dlstrtct and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines W forty a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year 1n Mqy, the City Engineer flies a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a pu611c hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. N EXHIBIT 'A' ProPertles and iaprovenents to be included within Mnexatton No. 24 to Street L1ghting Maintenance District 1: Assess. No. of La s to be Mnexed Pro xt AcrEa9e -C^i~ Zone 1 TR 12870 - 67 4 - - - - Zone 2 OR 8T-16 .5 1 7>~ 1 T T - _ - ! ~~ / \7 ~~ ,, ~9Y ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION NO. 4! + I I. I ~~ I. i. I •• I•~ r .~ I. I• I w l. l• I• I ~ r .ir~'~ ~ ~, • i• i• i• 1• i. i I GROUA OCOVER( }},) 1 TpE ES (wJ 51pEET 2S`000 110 LEGEND TAAiI ]T.900 ~ - ISO.wrMO Ar•.1 -~-GrounAeOVN ' • Sirplliyht s,~`~ crrY of RANCHO cvcAxoxaA w ,,_, •. ~ COUNTY OF BAN BERPiARDIIdO , e ~: `~' i BTATH OF CALII+ORNIA ~-- N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION NO. q' j O[rifN I6L BIND M1EI.O ~ 4 ~NI1L11-ZANILY '~ uouaua conrLEx w,x,.ro~ nee naxwa <' y2na ImM.w ' 'xunv'eex /p~~'pxx/yWy ' MKK WLL `11VMIMIM~( ~ rIRJAfI I ~ - - -- F O n¢LV ,.. ...~._ I I ~RROw NLn, ~- I s%~ ~ CITY of a~xCao CUCw>I~oxae ~ ~RB7--l~ • _, •• '"= COUNTY OF 8AN BEBNASDINO _ ~'~''~ c ; 8TAT8 OF CALII+ORNIA - N ' ----- C[TY OF RANCHO Ci;CA~10NGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 4, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Jud)r Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide ~. ~Y SUBJECT: ORDERING THE NORK IN CONNECTION KITH ANNEXATION N0. 26 FOR TRACT N0, 12870, LOCATED ON THF. NORTH SIDE OF HIGHLAND AVENUE BETNE6N ETINANDA AND EAST AVENUES, TO STREET LIGHTING M1IINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2 RfCON1ElOATI011: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 26 to Street Lighting Maintenance District Ne. 2 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS --+ ~t~.. ...enrle~ rlw rn~ in ALLLtaea Tor biTy Wurnii apy, wei ~" 1 .- .. connection with Annexation No. 26 to Street-Lightlrtg Maintenance District No. 2 for Tract No. 12870, located on the north side of Highland Avenue between Etiwanda and East Avenues. The developer of the subJect tract has been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88-191. Respectfull submitted, C` ~~_ ~~ RHM:JA:,1h Attachments 3s~ RESOLUTION N0. g D ~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGq ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 26 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT N0. I2870 .HEREAS, `ha City Council - the City a` Rancho Cucaranya d -- the 6th day of April, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 88-192~toVorder the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 26 to Street Lighting Maintenance Cistrict No. 2, which Resolution of Intention No. 88-192 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after Lhe adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duiy mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88-192, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as knoan to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and mmnier as reyu ireu uy iaw, as nyyears tram one nrr idavli or ma7 n ng on n ie rn the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, Concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set Forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88-192, be done and made; and SECTiOH 2: The "ncyurL hied by the Engineer is hereby finaiiy approved; a- n~-- SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4; the assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tracer's ~e heen occupied. 35~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 Annexation No. 26 for Tract No. 12870 SEC?ION I. Authority for Report This report is to compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Dtvisi.rn 15 of the Streets arM Nf9hway5 Code, State of California iLandscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION Z. General Description This City Council has alerted to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance 0lstrict No. 2. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintalred will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Mork to De provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materlais for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street lioht improvements on local crr.nt. .. -~;,~„ ,,,, ine sighting ui>tr in AILaS Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and SDeclfications The plans and speclfitations for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights areas stipulated 1n the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering 61vts1on. Reference is hereby made to the subJect tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report *_e the saa+e e=iertt as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. 6etailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the 111umination of the subject area. SECTION 4. Estimated_Costs No Costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be construeted by developers. Based en available data, it 1s estiamted that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These eosts are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated Lotal cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 i5 shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenan<o and Energy Cost: No. of Lamps Last's Annex New Lamp Lean Stze* YTD Na. 26 Total 5800L 1264 28 1292 9500L 4 0 *M1gh Pressure 3odlum Vapor Total Total Annuat Lamp Size Laps Rate Mo's Ms1nt. Cost SBOOL 1292 X f 8.93 X 12 • 5138,45D.72 9500L 4 X (10.16 X 12 487.68 •. iainc. post 2. Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation ° 47% Assessment Units !his annex per page 4 61 Total Assessment Units 4863 ~~ 3, Cost oer Assessment Untt: Total Annual Maintenance Cost - 5138 • =28.57/year/anti o.o n s n src Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as expiained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Dlaarae Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2', Annexation No. 26. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of th/s report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general Deneflt to all units w1tA1n the District and that assessment shall be equal for eacA unit. N1len unlit arc based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per rtet acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention t0 annex a 0lstrtct and cetc ro~h7f~ horn n~ Aaf~ 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to forty a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year to June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and aDDroves, ar modifies and approves the individual assessments. yd~ EXHIBIT 'A' Properties and iagroveiaents to be included within Annexation Na. 26 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 2; Assess. No. oP Laans to 4s Annexed Pro ~t lkreaae Tine' Zone 1 TR 12870 - 67 28 - - _ _ ya a ,N~~t ~NZ o NG poM~a~~t p55~sr$ Mp`NSEN~ ~b ~e'~'N~`NG _~`A~ ~~1 Sg os ~MENT oq e ~ y -A/Nr~NANCE' RAM `EG~kp ~;yo°`~4°t 5 tPEES IW ~Er~o°oo fp" ~e1 ~\~ Aso a~1 2'+~O `'tt P~t~ ~~b~ ~~~ 9~ ~~~ ~1 Vg \ ~~ ~.~ i} ~~ ~~ ~i •'~~ ~'~ C~ ~ ~~ $~ cA~:~s N~' Z ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. Z ANrEXAT1ON NO. 2 b ~~ ~ ~, I~ ~ I w ~ / /1 NIGNLA!10 GROUNOCOYER( .fl.) I TREES UoJ LEGE NO STREET 2!.000 ~ f0 (EIi~eMO ArE.) -~Atmx TAAIL 37.!00 ~ - lSo. R'L) • Shutliy~l ~-~~. crrY of RAxcxo cvcA~soxaA ~`j ' ' = COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO n at %~:~yV, s ~: ' 6~ ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA -~- ~T ---- CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA STAFF REPQRT DATE: May 4, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide ~~ s~> SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION KITH ANNEXATION N0. 44 FOR TRACT N0. 12810, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHLAND AVENUE BETWEEN ETIWAND4 ANO EAST AVENUES, AND AP.CNIBALD AVENUE GATEWAY MONUMENTS, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST ANO NORTHWEST CORNERS OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AhD 4TH STREET, TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT M0. 1 RECpfEN0ATI011: It is recamnended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 44 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS atSecCcd "- C; CJ buunl.il approval is a resolution ordering the work in connectionVwith Annexation No. 44 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Tract No. 12870, located on the rrorth side of Highland Avenue between Etiwanda and East Avenues, and Archibald Avenue Gateway Monuments, located at the northeast and northwest corners of Archibald Avenue and 4th Street. The developer of the <,ih~ect proJetts has been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88-193. Respectfu ubmitted, r ,R : 3~ Attachments RESOLUTION N0. u v ~.-p7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONH ECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 44 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT N0. 12870 ANO ARCHT BALD AVENUE GATEWAY MONUMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 4th day of May, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 88-194 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 44 to LardscaDe Maintenance District. No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 88-194 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the Cf ty Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, Location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on fSle in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all oersons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88-194, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clnr4 ~r +Fo r?~; of Ranrhn r~„•,m,...~: -•!;; c~ -o;,; ~upies were au ly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the ,iu rfsdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired ,{urisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1; It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamo- nga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88-194, be done and made; and SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer s ere y finally approved; and SECTION 3: 8e it further resolved that the assessments and method of assessmen i~E~'n~he Engineer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: Be it finally resolved that said assessments shall not begin unti~60 percent of said tracts have been occupied. ~fbS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District Na, 1 Annexation No. 44 for Tract No. 12810 and Archibald Avenue Gateway Monuments SECTION 1, Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new subdivisions into Landscape Maintenance District Mo. 1. The Cfty Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract No. 12870 and Archibald Avenue Gateway Monuments as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are sham on the recorded Map as roadway right-of-way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, SECTION 3, Plans and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subiect tract map or development Dian and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made apart of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4, Estimated Costs rvo costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (f. 30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual Cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 including Annexation No. 44 is as follows: , Existing Annex New District :0 44 To"1 ~andscapc Area 920,152 71,900 992,052 No. of D. U. 9,553 61 9,620 Per Lot Annual Assessment 992,052 X f .30 291,615.60 73 X f5, 00 365.00 Z97;'980. b~T E297,980,60 E30,97 9,620 ~~~ Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. Nhere the development covered by this annexation involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maf ntained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced, SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exnib+r p•~ by this refzrznce the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Mhere there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcei of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units Der lot or parcel. The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred Dy the CTty during the previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1, city Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Rnnex to District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the Ctty Council conducts a Dub17c hearing and approves, or modifies and aDProves the individual assessments. yap Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 44 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1; MAINTAINED AREA TRACT D/U 12870 61 Et!ra.^.da Ave. --- 23,uu7 40 Trail 37,500 Archibald Ave. (NN & NEC) Gateway Monuments y560 6,840 33 TOTAL 4,560 67,340 13 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION N0. ~f-I ~! ~I-I,I rlwirl~irT .~ I« I .~ u l u l w l r l w 1 w .T~i I~I~i. ~~~.~.~. T •Ii .. GROUNDCOV EII (r .11J TREES WJ LECENO •REET 23.000 40 ;EtiwaMe Aral ~ Grewndcprq TPAIL 3L 900 ISa.NU • SinBlip~t ~?. ~~~~'?` CfTY OF RANCHO CUCA,~I( ,4 •~ _: `~' ~ ENGINEERING DIVISION tm VICINITY S1AP N r ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION N0. 44 v W n~ ~~ u Q p .~ ~a Q 1,Q 8. W ~I E..w~ww fa tand¢.{Yq .oa wrronraror aes~s~ao'/ mss. cam' .va iibo i/aa. ss' Np v~:e i/J.tsi N~M7iD l/ .'^ JYI.e /b.../ 8~ p!G1nA~~ ~~ 6 ~l T_ '!/.~~ -M~'9 t0 iI MIOI ~~ ~. ~. 3AN BfRNARO(NO A/c~NG'E ~~ .~' `~~~`'~'`^ CITY OF RANCHO CIJCA`IO(NGA }; j . _; ~~; = HNGINEERING DIVISION ' T `' ~tfi ~'ICIVITY `1AP Il\~11 in, f m ~~ o~ t~ a~ ~R Q n tmv nc n n rrn vn nr rn ~ vr.. v. . STAFF REPORT DATE: Mqy 4, 1986 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: JuQy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide r3. P5 SUBJECT: ORDERING 7HE NORK IN CONNECTION KITH ANNEXATION N0. 18 FOR DR 87-16. LOCATED EAST OF ETINANOA AVENUE, NORTH OF ARRON ROUTE, TO LANDSCAPE IMTNTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 RECOIIEIDATION: It is recaammnded that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 18 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and aDProving the Engineer's Report. BACKBROUNO/ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approvai is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation Na. 18 to i,~~.c_;:.°,:t:,:c,iance uistrlct No. 3 f-- ~,^. ~:-iv, iocaced east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Arrow Route. The developer of the subject protect bas been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatfvely approved by Resolution No. 88-195. Respe~ctf Uy submitted, ~ ) ~ ~~ FHM. Attachments `~'~~ RESOLUTION N0. ~ ~' - ~~ S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG4 ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNE%ATION N0. 18 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OISTRI CT N0. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR OR 87-16 WHEREAS, the City Councii of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 6th day of April, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 88-196 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 18 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, which Resolution of Intention No. BB-196 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvements, was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the gffidavit of Posting said notlces, on file to the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in sa!d Resolution of Intention No. 88-196, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mat led in the time. form. anA manner as requires oy iaw, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the Ctty Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the ,jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired ,jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga t at the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intent ion No. 88-196, be done and made; and SECTiOn 2: 8e it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer is ere y finally approved; and SECTION 3; Be it further resolved that the assessments and method of assessment n t e Engineer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4; Be it finally resolved that said assessments shall not begin unti~Tet•te~ 60 percent of said tracts have been occupied. y~~ CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 Rnnexation No. 18 for DR 87-16 SECTION 1. Aut horit,~for Report This reDOrt is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1912). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into landscape Maintenance District ho, 3. The Ctty Council has determined the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all the developments as mentioned above. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed developments are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right-of-way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and iandscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval `-~ ti.a ~c.civ~nnenC anu as approves oy the City tngineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subJect development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of thfs report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred by the District for parkway and median improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers and or/by the City. Based on historical data, coniract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (5.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will he hacnd nn actual cosy Aaia, Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 has been demarcateA into two zones. Zane 1 is comprised of Parcel Map 130.9, comprised of 8 parcels, totaling 6,057 square feet. The district was formed in October 5, 1983, for the maintenance of landscaping a detention basin and storm drain within the pro,lect. This zone will be assessed on per lot basis for the maintenance costs within the pro,l ect boundary only as stipulated in the Engineer's Report for the formation of the District. 7 ~~ Zone 2 is comprised of all other projects that are being annexed or will be annexed to this District. All lots or parcels within Zone 2 will be assessed on net acre basis for the maintenance of landscaped median islands on Haven Avenue from 4th Street to Deer Creek Channel, Foothill Boulevard and 4th Street from west to east City limit, Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue, from 4th Street to foothill Boulevard, 6th Street from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue and median Islands on other maJ or divided highways and some parkways within the Industrial SPeclfic Plan Area and Foothill Boulevard overlay area. The estimated cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 including Annexation No. 18 fs as follows. Zone 1 Total estimated maintenance cost Assessment units Total cost - assessment unit for year and month Zene 2 Total estimated annual maintenance area - Sq. Ft. Assessment units, acres total cost i assessment unit for year and month Existing District f2, 070 8 52070 5258.75/year or f21.56/mo./lot Existing Annexation New 0 0 0 380,631.5 .5 380,632 ~0 x,~S.3~ S 0/year 0/mo./acre Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram A eopy of the DiDDvieu' dcc acc mcni ri_iann am . .~~...~...w a. >u_ labeled "Exhibit A", by this reference the diagram ismhereby incorporatedand within the text of this report. `~~ ~ SECTION fi, Assessment Improvements for the District are found to 6e of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel for Zone 1 and shall be equal to the next acreage for each lot or parcel in Zone 2, The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting pct of 1972, SECTipI 7. Order of Events 1, City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets pubiic hearing date. 3, City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines 4o Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a pubiic hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. ~~~ Properties and Improvements to be inciuded within Annexation No. 18 (Zone 2) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3: PROPERTIES PROJECT ACREAGE OR 87-16 .6 IMPROYEMEN7 AREAS TO BE ANNEXED IN ANNEI(ATION N0. 1 Area 5~t• Haven Avenue 0 Foothill Boulevard 0 Milliken Avenue 0 4th Street 0 Rochester Avenue 0 6th Street 0 ~~~ ASSESSMENT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT ANNEXATION NO. IC ~`~~"'~'`^ CITY OF RAtiCHO CI;CAhIONGA ~ pRB7-I(~ S"~•,'_ x,!y~?i3Ci. F ~ ENGINEERING DIVISION A 7 Cam' VICINITY ~tAP 1\`II CITI' OF RANCHG CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: MAy 4, 1988 Tp; City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N, Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junlor Engtneering Aide rte. ~r SUBJECT: ORDERING THE NORK IN CONNECTION KITH ANNEKATION N0. 14 FOR DR 87-16, LOCATED EAST OF ETINANDA AVENUE, NORTH OF ARRON ROUTE, TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. fi RECOlIEIO1ITIOY: It is recoa~ended that City Council approve the attached resolutlon ordering the work 1n connection with Annexation Mo. 14 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND/AN/1YSIS Attached for City Council approval 1s a resolution orderlnn the work in connortinn r/fh ,~pg.~..!cc Nc. ." •- Ct,~~;, Liyiiiiny i+ainunance uistrtct No. 6 far DR 87-16, located east of Etiwanda, north of Arrow Route. The developer of the sub,~ect protect has been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88-197. Respectf submitted, c :~h ---. Attachments Y~d RESOLUTION N0. 8 ~ '- ~- O ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE NORK IN CONNECTION WTTH ANNEXATION N0. 14 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR DR 81-16 Itu.EREAS, the City Council of the City of Ra!!cho Cucamonga did on the 6th day of April, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention Ho. 88-198 to order the therein described work in connection with Mnexation No. 14 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6, which Resolution of Intention No. 88-198 was duly and legally published in the time, fors and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Cierk; a~ WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed 'Notice of ImQrovement", Wes duly and legally posted to the tile, fors, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posttng said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of intention No. 88-198, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Cierk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed to the time, fors, and OlDllllcl Yi icyViicV u) w, u uy~.c uii ~~vm .~.~~ •LLiy~~It ~e Y~alln; = CII= fn the office of the C1ty~Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly recetved considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the ,lurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired ,~urisdlction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It Ts hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation t0 the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described 1n said Resolution of Intention No. 88-198, be done and made; and C MTTI,Y 9. TAn DnnnN it1nA 6.. 1An Cw wT wnnr Ie An..nhv •'l nta rv approved; ate- SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's e-R post are hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said trac~ve been occupied. ~/ / CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 Annexation No. 14 for DR 87-16 SECTION 1. Authority for Report this report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of Cal7fnrnia (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all Lots within said developments as welt as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on local streets as shnvn nn fha iinhr;nn District Altos Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street tights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Oivision. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made apart of fFa rep Crt tC the iai'nc 2xterd a5 if [a iH nianc anA eneriiire W attached hereto. ~ .~~ ~~ -~--~~~-" "" ` Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any irtprovement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. ~v~ SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construct ton. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estfmated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will he based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance Df strict No. 6 fs canprised of street light improvements on local streets for industrial, commercial and institutional improvements throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives xhe same benefit as two assessment units in residential zones. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 is shown 6e low: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and EneraY Cost: No. of Lanes Lamps Aimex New Lamp Lamp Size' YTD No. 14 Total 5800E 47 ___ q7 9500E 2 --- p 'High Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps Rate Mo's Maint. Cost 5800E ~ 47 X E 8.93 X 12 = E5,036.52 9500E 2 X E10.16 X 12 243.84 Total Annual Mai nt. Cost E5,280.36 2. Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation 438,5 Rssessment Units this annex per page 4 = 1,0 T'vt al Aiseiimeni iifiite di3 n yap 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost E6~,3r6 " 212.01/year/unit o. o n s n srct Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6", Annexation No. 14, These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shalt be equal for each unit, When units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTIpI 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3, City Council conducts publTt hearing, considers ali testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5, Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. c~aa EXHIBIT "A" Properties and improvements to be included Nithin Annexation No. 14 to Street Lighting Matntenante District 6; Assess. No. of Lairos to be Annexed Pro ect AcreagE ~ITnif- L OR 87-16 .6 1 --- --- --- _-- --- C/ d"J ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTIN~3 MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6 ANNEXATION NO. 14 SITE -M*4!.~. ~~o R~ ~MULfI-f~NILY wn`r.n- ~1 NgI61U6 COMfLfX ruu<iw ~' < ~fVV Menww ~qbY lD% CnM~MR/ /p~~ ~ ' ' MOCK WI.I{.--1~ ~1KN1nw1w ~ S O ~ I ~_ .. 3 'F ORM flEly _-, I T MROW NW. ~"~~ CITY OF RANCNO CUCAI~ONOA w ~Rg-~ l~ tr ~' ('AUNTY OF 8AN BEBNARDIIdO , ~ ~" ""`~ STATE OF CALII+ORNIA A T -~_ ~; 6 1~1 ---- CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~tONGA STAFF REPORT Date: May 4, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Paul A. Rougeau, City Traffic Erg!..^.eer _ti i SubJect: Permit Parking Ordinance and Resolution to form a Permit parking Distrlct around Alta Lana Htgh School RECOMMEMOIITIOM• It is recommended that the addition of Chapter 10.50 to the Municipal Code establishing authority and procedure to form Permit Parking Districts be adopted and that a Resolution forming Permit Parking Distrlct A around the Aita Loma High School to eliminate the encroachment of vehicular parking incidental to the A1gh school be approved. B11C1(6RQU11D/ANALISIS In response to a request by the City Councii at its April 6, 1988 meeting, an Ordinance to authorize and procedures to form Dermit Parking Districts bas been prepared. Additionally, the City Council requested that a permit parking district be fonaed that Includes the area within one-half mice of the Atta Lama High Schooi boundaries. A Resolution establishing Permit Parking Distrlct A around the high school has also been prepared. The Resolution cannot take effect until the above Ordinance is effective. Upon detailed analysis of the impacted area, it became apparent that only the immediate area around the high School would need to be signed. Most people will not walk over 600 fee: to their destination from the place where they park. By increasing this distance to 1300 feet (one-quarter mile), it is believed alnast all high schooiers also will not park that far away and walk to school. In this quarter mile area, approximately 46D residential homes are impacted by the signs and have need for permits. If the permit area was eztended to one-half mile at thfs time, about 5 to 6 timec more rest dents ye~~)d he !mpsctEd. Thi< ey,.ens!on ::.uld unaoubtediy also allow many parking permits to be available to hlyh school drivers, who would use them to park close to the school and defeat the purpose of this effort. ~/as CCSR May 4, 1988 Page 2 The high school principal has been contacted and informed of the City's pending effort to irsta'.'. permit only parkins sianaae. The school is aware of the parking short-fall and has been making efforts over the last couple of years to lessen the parking impact on City streets, When the current principal took aver, he reorganized the parking lots usage and then increased the student parking lot from 280 to 320 spaces. This lot increased a short while ago to 346 spaces. There are plans to increase this again by 35 spaces next year. There is, however, a demand to park about 500 student vehicles. This need will lessen after the new high school is built in 1991, 1900 students will transfer to 1t from both Alta Loma and Etiwanda High Schools. When this transfer of students occurs, Alta Cana High School should be able to handle its student parking demand. Since approximately 460 homes will be receiving permit parking stickers, a conservative estimate of the number of hi 9h school students who will have access to the permit parking stickers (or guest permits) 7s 100. If the signage is increased to the boundaries, about 600 to 700 hi 9h school students will have access to permits, These numbers will defeat the purpose of this effort. A short term remedy seems appropriate. Perhaps the students could use some of the available parking at the Red Hi11 Community Park, 120 parking spaces could be made available until the new high school is opened. This is enough parking to satisfy the student parking demand and help eliminate misuse of permit parking stickers. It is recommended, in addition to the Ordinance and Resolution, that the City Council direct staff in regards to this short-term remedy. Other near-by cities were contacted regarding the encroachment of student parking around high schools. The City of Ontario has a permit parking only district around Chaf£ey High School. Ontario High School does not yet have such a district, because several years ago rw parking anytime zones were installed in impacted residential areas before the City had a oermft parking only ordinance. The Traffic Engineer intends to replace the nu ark iri- ZuiieS with '` "?" dis?rift a time nnrmi E3, V 9 per..,, parking s The City of Upland installed a permit parking only district around Upland High School about 15 years ago. Also, they have permit parking only districts around the Post Office and the hospital. ~a,~ CCSR May 4, 1988 Page 3 The City of Montclair installed a permit parkins only district around Montclair High School about 5 years ago. Respe ul submitted, . am '- Attachment lja ~ ~~ ] E ~t r` r ¢_ x n a h i~ Cull ~` n r 1~ ~~, 801~N R I ll lal Yl A~~ITAI iY.i i`~l]111p ~1i11I I''~'*^~ ~ .4`~r' t ~ S T Y ~I ~l ~ ~J./~ i~ ~I r m ~~~,j(~7~] ,~ ~ ~Y~ '!""" ALTA LOMA '~~~"- ~!'+? ~~n ~~ I-m H I rr~" I I I I R I I I II."-'-.I - ~ _~~ i I /~. ~. .~a~~~ ~ -~,- a . [ T.i L._I ~ Yd~l~w~' ...........S .~..-...w i r»-; niiaiiiiailaill tl~i Ma ~~/'• r'^, ~yl_ ~ ~~~ppoPoS~D PERMIT- ~J;;~ pA{2K4NCa DISTi21GT /~, '-== °: v6~~ you NOlZy: uu•e. u......u... u...• =_ s . ~ vY Lam. ~. ~' -v ~.~.I ~ L~-... ~ ~- ~ ~'~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~ ~---tom- ORDINANCE N0. 3 y FOLLOkS: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON611 ADDING ARTICLE 10.50 TO TITLE 10 OF THE R11NCH0 CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROVIDE FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PERMIT PARKING DISTRICTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII GOES ORDAIN AS SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding awn rt11e, to be nuebered 10,50 and corststing of sections to be nuabered 10.5G.010 through 10.50.140, inclusl~e, which said Article reads as follows: ARTICLE PREFERENTIAL PARKING DISTRICTS Sec.10.50.010. Definitions. As used in this Article, the following terws shall have the following meanings: "Engineer" means the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. "Permit Parking District' means an area established by resolution of the City Council whereto parking restrictions apply to ail vehicles except vehicles which have been issued a parking penit pursuant to this Article and vehicles exempted by Section 10.50.100. "Resident" means a person who lives in a dwelling unit located within a Permit Parking Ofstrict. "Merchant" means a person wha operates a business within a Permit Parking District. 'Guest" means any person visiting or lntendlrg to visit a resident or merchant residing or working 1n a Permit Parking District. Sec. 10.50.020. Designation of Peewit Parking Districts The City Council may establish Permit Parking Districts by resolution. Any such resolution shall designate the boundaries of the Permit Parking District and shall specify the nature of the oarking limitations which 'py r,e w~wrn we ur xr'rtV ui opera tors of VehICI@S other than Veh7Cle5 wld Ch have been issued a permit pursuant to this Article, or wh1cA are exempted from this Artlcte pursuant to Section 10.50.100. Sec. 10.50.030. Minimum Size ~i~-y Permit Parking Districts shall contain at tease four (4) blocks or at least one (1) mile of curb frontage. Sec. 10.50.040. Petitions Residents or merchants mqy petition the Ctty Council for the establishing of a Permit Parking District. Any such petition shall designate the boundaries of the proposed district and shall be signed by at least seventy flue (75f) percent of the residents or merchants residing or working xi thin the proposed dtstrici. Such a petition shall be ftTed xith the Engineer who shall prepare a report to the City Council on the proposed district, including the Enggineer`s recommendations regarding the establishment thereof. The Engineer shall forward his report together with the petition to the City Council. Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the authority of the Ctty Council to establish a Permit Parking District in the absence of such a petition. Sec. 10.50.050. Signs Upon the establishment of a Permit Parking District, the Engineer shall cause appropriate signs to be erected to the district, indicating thereon the parking limitation applicable to the district and the exemption therefrom of vehicles with permits. Sec. 10.50.060. Exemption for Permit Holders. The parking limitations Imposed within a Permit Parking District pursuant to this Article shall not apply to vehicles for which a parking permit pertaining to that district has been issued pursuant to this Article, Y'~~ u .. .. yii ~w, ,a u ar.uJ ca ii, tiT uOi,liel rI eaLl IUaV III iC4N Y11 10.50.090. No such permit shall reserve any particular parking place within the district to the holder of the permit. Each such permit shall be valid only for the Permit Parking District for which it is issued. Sec. 10.50.070. Issuance of Permits Applications for perwlts to park within r Permit parking District way be made by any rest dent, merchant or employee of a merchant residing or working within such district. Such applications shall be filed with the Engineer or his designated representatives. Unless otherwise prescribed by the resolution establishing the district, not more than three (3) permits (exclusive of guest parking permits) shall be issued to residents of any single dwelling unit. Any person aggrieved by the decision n' the Engineer may appeal such decision to the City Manager, whose decision on the matter Sec. 10.50.080. Guest barking Permits Unless otherwise prescribed in the resolution establisMng a Penait Parking District, each resident holding a parking permit shall be entitled to ~/.3 a receive guest parking permit forms from the Engineer. Such resident, unless modified 6y resolution, may issue a guest parking permit to any guest of such resident by noting such resident's name and address on the form, dating and signing the form and identifytrg the vehicle for which the permit is issued by license number on the font. Each such guest permit parking permit shall be valid until 12:00 noon of the day following the date of issuance. Any vehicle for which a guest parking permit has been Issued shall be exempt from the parking limitations while parked 300 feet or closer of residence being visited within the district during the period for which 1t is valid, provided such permit 15 displayed 1n the manner prescribed in Section 10.50.040. Sec. 10.50.090. Display of Permits (a) A parking permit issued pursuant to Lhts Article (other than a guest parking permit) shall be penaanently affixed to the lower driver side of the inside of the rear window of the vehicle for which it was issued. (b) Guest parking permits shall be displayed face up on the driver front dashboard of the vehicle for which ft was issued. Sec. 10.50.100. Excwpt Vehicles. The following vehicles are exempt from the parking restrictions applicable to arty Permit Parking District: (1) Repair, maintenance, refuse collection, utility, fuel, delivery and service vehicles being used in the coupe of business. (2) Yehlcles owned or operated by any governmental agency, or ~nn}ronhnn nF a nn vewwwaMal ,nn..... Ln1+.. .....J ,~ aL ...... a ... _, . ... "' "' i ""~•'~~' ~i~"~!• ++'.~ ++++ 'n u.R ..VV~iG V• VViI11Cii• (3) Emergency, life support and health care vehicles being used in the course of business. Sec. 10.50.110. Authority of the Engineer The Engineer is authorized to establish rules and procedures and Lo produce signs, forms and other materials necessary or appropriate to implement the provisions of this Article. Sec. 10.50.120. Permit Fees The City Council may, by resolution, establish fees for permit applications under this Article. Sec. 10.50.130. Dissolution of Permit Parking Districts The City Council may, by resolution, terminate and dissolve any previously established Permit Parking District. / ~J Sec. 10.50.140. Penal Provisions (a) Unless exempted by the provisions of this Article, na person shall stand or parka motor vehicle in any Permit Parking District in violation of any parking restrictions established pursuant to this Article. ib) No person shall falsely represent himself or herself as eligible fora parking permit or furnish false information to the Engineer or his representatives to an application fora parking permit. (c) No person who has been issued a parking permit shall thereafter allow the use thereof by any other person. (d) No person shall copy, Droduce, create or use any facsimile or counterfeit parking permit. SECTION 3: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of"{Ffs ordinance is for ally reason held W be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court or competent Jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the rsaining portions of this ordinance. The Lity Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsettlan, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. ADOPTED this day of 1988. enn s ou dyor ATTEST: every u e y e I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a reguiar meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 4th day of May, 1988, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 4th day of May, 1988. Executed this 4th day of May, 1988 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. every u e e, y e ~3a- RESOLUTION N0. p O ' a O~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT A NHEREAS, pursuant to Article 10.50 of Title 10 of the Rancho Cucamonga Muncipal Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to adopt a Resolution establishing Pereit Parking Districts wherein parking restrictions apply to ail vehfcies except vehicles which have been issued parking pewits pursuant to said Article; and NHEREAS, this Council finds and deteraines that the resldentia'. neighborhood located generally one-half (1/2) mile from the school boundaries of Alta Loma High School and more specifically described herein below is in need of a Pernit Parking District in order to protect its integrity agatnst the encroachaent of vehicular parking incidental to the said high school; and NHEREAS, this Council finds that only certain streets within Bald district need to be initially signed for said District and additionally finds that if other streets not initially signed are also encroached upon by school parking, that the City Engineer shall also sign these other streets against said parking; NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL4E0, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: i. Permit Parking District A is hereby established and bounded by the following: a. 19th Street between Hellman and the west City limit. b. The west City limit between 19th Street and Base Line Road. c. The Cucamonga Creek fraa Base Line Road to a point 2700 feet southerly of Base Line Road. d. A straight line from said point and due east to its intersection of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway. e. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway between said intersecting point and Hellman Avenue. f. Hellman Avenue between the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway and 19th Street. No person shalt park any vehicle at any time between 8:00 A. M. and 3:00 P.M. on any school day within Penait Parking District A, except persens and vehicles exempted fraa such parking restrictions pursuant to the previsions of Article 10.50 of Title 10 of the Rancho Cucamonga Muncipal Code. ~3 3 CCSR Resolution No. May 4, 1988 Page 2 3. The City Engineer is autiwrized and directed to place signs or markings in Permit Parking District A giving adequate notice of the parking restriction imposed hereby. No violation of the P.anchc Cucamonga Municipal Ccda arising fraa the adoption of 4his Resolution shall be deemed to have occurred until such signs or markings have been placed. 4. Tha City Engineer is directed to place signs or markings on the following streets within Permit Parking District A: a. Iromrood Street from Vineyard Avenue t0 Alder Street. b. Agate Street from Ironwood Street to La Vine Street. c. Garnet Street from Ironwood Street to La Vine Street. d. Alder Street from Ironwood Street to Beryl Street. e. Beryl Street from Alder to C1e11W Street. f. Pepper from west of Beryl to east of Beryl. 9. Vineyard east side from Church Street to Base Line Road. h. Roberds Street from west of Agate Street to Beryl Street. 1. Cielito Street Pram La Vine Street to Beryl Street. ,~. La Mancha from La Vine to La Verne Street. k. La Verne Street from La Mancha W La Dona Street. 1. La Dona Street from La Verne Street to Cielito Street. m. La Paz Court north of La Verne Street. 11. La Luna nu rlil VI is eil[V j1.rElL. a. La Lanza north of Cielito Street. p. La Vine from Carnelian Street to Cielito Street. q. La Vine from Agate Street to Garnet Street. r. La Lema east of Garnet Street. s. La Grande from Garnet Street to Beryl Street. t. Emerald Street fray La Vine Street to Avalon Street. u. Opal Street from La Vine Street to Avalon Street. v. Luring from Emerald Street to Opal Street. w. Monte Vista from Emerald Street to Opal Street. x. Avalon Street from Carnelian Street to Opal Street. y. Carnelian from Cai1e del Prado to Avalon. z. Ca11e del Prado from Vineyard east to end. The City Engineer may sign or mark any other street which 1s detcTni neu' to need 'signing ur marking OT Lhe Sald parking restriction. 4. This Resolution shall not be affective until the Ordinance of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adding Article 10.50 to Title 10 of Lhe Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Coda Ts effective. y3~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM ~.~ ~'~ ~} DATH: April 14, 1488 TY7: Mayor and Ci [y Council FROM: Mark R. Lorimer, Sr. Adminietra Clue Ae sietent ~~ St1g16CT: Le[ter Regarding Telephone Directory Designer ion Attached for your considers tion ie a draft letter for the Mayor's signature regarding the City/Community name to be designated in future GTH Cal ifornie telephone directories. 1be letter indicates that residence may choose arq one of the fol loving Community names -- Alta Lome, Cucamonga or Ht ivanda -- simply by returning a ape ci el ballot. Those not returning e ballot pill automatically be referenced in the directory pith the Rencha Cucamonga deatgna Lion. T'he City Council ie asked to rev iev the letter end approve it for the Havoc's eivnature end distribution. Should you have arty qua etions or comments rage rding Chia lest ter, please feel Free to contact Lauren Waase rmen of Mark Lorimer. MRL/mrl et techment ~/ 3S April 15 1988 Deer Resident: The City of Rancho Cucamonga and GT6 Ce lifornie ere working cooperatively to improve information provided in your telephone direc torp~ and we need your input regarding the listing of gout residential or business address and telephone number in future directories. Currently such information is lie tad with your address end telephone number, along with one of [he following city/comunity names - Rancho Cucamonga, Alta Lome, Cucamonga or Btiwande. Moat people trod itionelly search the directory for the city in which a resident iivee or a 6ua ineee ie located. Such a single city lie ling hee not been the case in Rancho Cucsmonga~ and this hoe caused a certain amount of con £ueion. At the same tiee~ the City and GTR recognise the[ it ie important to many residents to have [he choice of an individual comunity identity or a city lie ting. To retain your current list ing~ simply indicate Che name of the ciip/comaunity on the enc loved ballot end return it no later then Jules 15. 1988. If you choose to 6e lie tad ae Rsneho Cueemonga~ eimp ly discard the balloti end you will be :in tad .n F..ruro dirge rnri.a wi ch the Rgnc hn Cucamon ¢e daei¢mtion. You need return the ballot card only if you wish to retain Alto Loma, Cucemonga~ or Btiwanda ae your comunity ed dress (these comunity names will be rots fined in direc Cary sae is [ante). Ae part of Chia ballot procea e, GT6 Ce lifornie will nat charge for any changes made to the city/comunity name you choose. Such changes will be in effect October, 1488. Changing the city/comunitq name will not affect your poe Cal service listing since the U.S, postal Service relies on a epee if is zip code and not the name of a city or comunity. This change fie limited only Co the CTB directory. The City of Ranchn Cueamonge end GT6 California wish to thank you for making your choice of directory designs [ion. IE you have goes [ions or cantatas regarding telephone direc torq lie tang e, plea ee contact a GTB Cue COmer Representative (residence 1-800-482-6701 or business 1-500-482-6702). S{nears lye Dennis L. Stout Mayor DLS:bea enc louvre y3~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOIdGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Mdy 4, 1988 ' T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SU&IECT: HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIONATIOM /29:7914 ALTA CUESTA DRIYE, THE ADAMS HOUSE - A Proposal to designate the Adams House as Historic Landamrk No.29. The house is located at 7914 Alta Cuesta Orive. I. RECQNENDATION: The Historic Planning Cawission recommends that e ounc 1 approve Historic Landmark Designation i29 with the adoption of the attached Resolution. II. BACKGROUND: The 1987 Survey of Historic Resources identified this grope as a potential landmark. It is the first to be processed as part of a program to Cesignate in an orderly manner landmarks throughout the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Nhen the owners were notified ahm~t tha nrnnneat ihov inttta7ty were opposed to designation, but later they concurred. (See attached letters). The house, built in 1935 and designed by Architect Saul H. Brown, is a floe example of Spanish Colonial Revival architecture which was popular in California in the 1920's and 1930's. it Ts significant because of its architecture and because 1t was built by a prominent local family, the Adams, who were actively involved in canmunity life. III. HISTORIC PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: A public hearing was held on pr a w o a ommission passed a Resolution recommending designation of the Adams House as a Historic Landmark because it meets severai of the criteria listed In the Historic preyervatton Crdiaance. ~t3 ~ CITY CWNCIL STAfF REPORT HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION M29:7914 May 4, 1988 Page 2 Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:AB:,15 Attachments: Exhibit "A" - HDC Staff Reonrt nF Anril 7. lOBR rlfh "tfarhw"Me Exhibit "B" - Letter from Staff to Habeckers Exhibit "C" - Letter from Habeckers to Staff with additional information Exhibit "D" - Resolution ~/3 g Joen~ C. Hwescac~ MI ALTA m16B1'A CVC.WON6A CA. ft'ND pul IYdbl April 7, 1988 Community Development Department Planning Division City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Califorttia 91730 Attn: Arlene Hanks Associate Planner Dear Eds. Hanks: ReYerence your letter. to ue dated April 4, 1988, proposing our home be designated a "Proposed Looal LandmarkN, we concur. Attached are some additions to the information you included in your "Historic Resources inventory^. Sincerely L~nn~~uo o~4e,. Owner l Owner L/3 9 S:a:e 0~ Ub'orry - - _ gSncv C EPFR TMENT Of PgRKS ~rv CyR EiP EAT'i0N HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY ~~CE`i'I FIGTICN Common game: J2r VO HAGS uAER_LOC_SHL NO._NF S;asus__ .. His;nr~.c -,ame: '""-d"'S -CLSP 3. $ttee[or rural addrea; 1914 Alta CuesLd Or. Gty -.dnCrlO „ CL f'.§d Zip Gounry - -2~^LL.^.. a, Parcel number: 07,C7-C73-C9 5. Prennt owns. John and Ann Habecker ~d,e9f; City Zip Ownerskip is; Public Private x 6. Present Uv: RR5l dente Origi.,al mr Residence O ESCRIPTION 7a. Arehiteen+N .rule: Monterey 7b. 6rieflY deecribe ttsa pm/ni PhY+~t'// /PPavavrc/ of Ne sin or stauRUn and dee;eriW /nV m/lor alnratiom from iv orpind condition: A single story el shaped structure of wood and stucco construction. Roof is front and side gable with red tile. Eaves are exposed. Siding material is smooth, white stucco. Windows are paired caserlent with flase shutters. Front door is wood with mul tioie glass Dane. There is a courtyard located within the shaoe of the ?1. ( This has been finished with red brick, and is complemented by a tall decorative font that screens the courtyard from the street. A separate front sable garage is lo- cated in the front of the structure, with a circul ul ar driveway completing the sc e rest or e area rough its placement on the property. A scell 8' x 12' -,~- Cce;t..., .,. aer ::oc cool sre :ec_aed or. .._ :ar'C: -_.. _ ... ...ae. ^e .-- scr,sred ~oy siiruo:,ery. :or,,..'n:: .. .. .e: .., ~.., scu ~'. ~. .,_.~n of c.., acusse. 8. Construttion date: Esvmated Factual ~_=G 10. BuJ.def 'xCi CSC - 11. Approz. prepsrty Site lTh hell rootage 1 ~- Qepm _:_j pr a 12. Oanlsl pl enclmeo pnomgrten lsl Julv 19A7 GDR 5221Rev. 11/B61 r1 ~ `/ ~w OEiggTNENT OF iggNS>.NO R~ gEAP:ON MASTER FILE HISTORIC RESOURCES DATA ENCODING SHEET NOTE: TM numben in PereaNeas indion eitMr the num Wr of characan (lenws, num Was, puneturtion marks, +Pauu mu may M emerM or da nvnber o} lion Nat may be me<ked. 1. Ser. No. 1730 _ 23 - 70. Regisiratian Status 111: City Zip 141 Foml Na. 1131 pmP. No. 1031 _ll Iimd -oan (61! /r _61 may W<ome Nigibb 2452 -21 tlettnninetl eliglbls - _$1 eligible Iwl IiRinq USGS Quad Mao No. (Q year III _61 inNigiae for above X 31 appears Niglble _71 vntlearmmed 2 UTM Zma 121 ~ N Bpi }21 q 11 4 ~/ /~CU 1 t. Proprty Given Rpamden Sam as 171: C ~t l pert qi aspic[ ~' 2; icdiri~.ul p:~~• _]) both of above 1 ProWrty Nartr: Common7NA a 1301: 12 NR qa Gtagory 111: Nirtork Name 1101: Adans House Parnl No,10.171 0207-073-09 _Jl Obtrict-No. of proparda ((}31 ~II tia C 31 buildup _sl ewcan X81 ablaet 1. Avftlna: 13 Od+ar Raeimatlan lPel 7914 Alta Cu - esta Drive TSwneer-(631- ~ tnet Nam. 14201 _nNbtwk Am. ele. SYwy _a) d. Nlaeorial I~ndmM[ _b Hbterie Am, Erg Rae 71 Cants Pt of H!at Inamt Naam[ Stmt 10.101 _71 Nadarael Nht Lrldmark~81 Lad Liad/p Rancho Cucamonga _al staiw Hietnk Pant _91 Caunty/RpianN Park tY own ~1 othrw C 91730 Videlityo< Lpcoda 151 Gry?own l/1 11. Pnaprty Atbtbuat: ._,,: S80 ,:...,.:._.,.__._:. _ ~II fine. family prop. X31 Nip S. Ttlpe of Uwmnhip 1171: .31 mutt family prop. ~' 11 IiytNOUa _11 andilary d4 ~Sl emutament park _ tl unknown X11 privaa _.51 hoof/moth _281 malumnt/mural/grantor _ 21 federal _ SI camN _81 cprirn, d0. 13 tt _171 folk art _ 31 tow __ 8) aN _ 71 rnrrlm. b10. over 3 tt _281 ttmt fumitun 71 epedM diebia _ 81 indwvial blq. _291 landlcapa ardbtr. _ 91 oubli< uuliry bl9• _301 treaWagaation B. Pasant Ua I/-0): _10) Meadn _J71 urWn open spats _111 anelnarine atrugt. X21 rural open span ~ 'I unknown _ 11 PHvaw noncanm. ,_121 dWC auditulum _]31 fertn/ranch II commercial ~ SI pudic _131 arlnty ntr/tot: hdl .311 military Mtgarty ' yY 31 repnndN ~ el non _111 eovemmnt ble• _]Sl CCCNYPA ttructun _151 eduudonal G0. -381 ethnic minority Property 7. Year of Initial Canatrsc8an: _181 nligioue bl0. ethnic group (5.201 _ i i i F/R depot Individual Property 111 1931 -18) tnl0 X71 hi sway/foil District IBI X91 EridP _381 womn'f property °' A~ _ 3:~GwII --301 ursel/aouaduR ~t01 nrnary 8. Ardriteetld ( 251: =' • 111 dam X91 other Buildarh110.251:: ~_' i^ ~..: :~'~.:; ~~!'_`=~;r T~1~ Arehinctural Pl.nt . c-Paul and Ndr and 5pepifiatlona: Yes X No ` !. yur ql Survey 121: _ 1987 DPR 860 (Rer. 12/831 Q l{~ Y / f _~ RESOLUTION N0, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK N0. 29 TO DESIGNATE THE "ADAMS HOUSE" LOCATED AT 7914 ALTA CUESTA DRIVE AS HiSTORIt LANDMARK DESIGNATION N0. 29. NHEREAS, the Hist9Hc Preservetion Coamtiss!an kas held a &:ly advertised pubilc hearing to consider ail comamnts on the proposed Historic landmark Designation No. 29 and issued Resolution No. 88-03 recommending to this City Council that Bald Historic Landmark Designation be approved. NHERFAS, the City Council has received and reviewed all input from the Historic Preservation Caawtsston regardfng said Historic Landmark Designation. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council hereby tykes the following~indfngs: A. The Droposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical period, type, style, region, or way of life. 8. fie proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned, important or local personality. r.. The nv"~al l .llw~~ „s M~ ~~~±~~~ ~! '„}~c pi Lpwe~ landmark is beautiful or its details and materials are beautiful or unusuai. D. The proposed Landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood, E. The proposed landmark in its iocatton represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood community, or city. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council does hereby approve the Historic Landmark Designation No, 29. C~C(~-~ nrmv nc n w wrn vn nr.n e,rnwrn w .,~~ y STAFF REPORT ~`V , ~ 7 Ci O.' O F': $ '2 DATE: April 7, 1988 ~'~ 'h 19'7 T0: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission rRGN: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: HISTORIC LANDHAPoC DESIGNATION OF 7914 ALTA CUESTA DRIVE - proposa o es gna e e ams ouse as s oric Landmark No. 29. The house is located at the corner of Alta Cuesta and Buena Yi sta Drive - APN: 207-073-09. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: fiat the Historic Preservation Commission recaawen~-i:o IEre City Council that they adopt a Resolution designating the Adams House, located at 7914 Alta Cuesta Drive, as Historic Landmark No. 28. 8. Location: 7914 Alta Cuesta Drive is at the corner of Alta ue7-end Buena Vista Drive fit aonears rn arr,unv fsro ._. Buena Vista and previously had a Cal~l~e Casino addressf. C. Surroundin Land Use and Zonin cr - ng a am y we ngs; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre). South - Singe family dwellings; Low Residential (Z-4 dwelling units per acre). East - Single family dwellings; Low Residential 2-4 dwelling units per acre). Nest - Red Hill Country Club. Golf course green is immediately adjacent to this property. D. General Pian Desi nations: Potential landmark site and a acen an o e nor ,south, and east are designated Low RaelAnnt:al f2_e Awe111 ng Dni tS oer acre). TAe Reu' Hill C_n_i_mr_v club to the east is designated "6olf Course". II. ANALYSIS: A. Site Characteristics: The site is on a steep slope, and the Fouse rs cu o see from the street. It 1s a U-shaped structure with a patio in the middle. Thick vegetation, a wood fence, a circular drive, the garage, and portions of the main /~~~ ITEM A HPC STAFF REPORT HLD/29 - ADAMS HOUSE April 7, 1988 Page 2 house can be seen from the street. From the parking lot of the country club, however, the house is in full view. Its east lawn slopes down to the golf course green, separated from it by a wire fence. According to the current owners, there was once a road where the golf course parking lot is now located, so that the house was once visible from a street. B. Background: This Spanish Colonial Revival house, currently ow~~y "John and Mn Nabecker, was built in 1935 by Paul and Margaret Adams who were eariy members of the Red Hill Country Club. Paul Adams was the manager of the Cucamonga Citrus Association and later the Alta Lam Citrus Association. Both Paul and Margaret Adams were activt Tn community affairs. The Adams were among the originai locals who began to 6evelop Red Hilt in the thirties as an exclusive nelghboMood for well-to- do, established families. C. General: The Historic Preservation OrdlnaMe states that in o~for a landmark to be designated, a description of the characteristics which Justify the designation must De included. Staff thinks that this house, the third Du17t on Red Hiii, is a floe example of Spanish Colorttal Revival architecture. It is also associated with important members of the community. Justification for its designation can thus be made on both architectural and historical grounds. D. Environmental Assessment: Designation of a landmark 1s exempt rom requ reen s rticle 19 Section 15308). III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Historic Preservation Commission Ordinance nc u es severs criteria as a guide in making fts determination. Applicable criteria are: A. Historical and Cultural Significance 1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical period, type, style, region, or way of life. 4. The proposed landmark teas carnected xit.", sar2one renowned, important or local personality. D. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance 2. The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark 1s beautiful or its details and materials are beautiful or unusual. ~Y Y HPC STAFF REPORT HLD/29 - ADAMS HOUSE April 7, 1988 Page 3 C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting The proposed landsark arterially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. The propose6 landarrk in its location represents an established and faaillar visual feature of the neighborhood, coaaaunity, or city. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This itaa has been advertised as a public hearing n~lCe rt newspaper, the property has been posted, and not ces sen property owners within 300 feet. The proper'1iy owners have been notified and a staff report and copy of the Historic Preservation Caawisslon Ordinance arlled to ths. Staff spoke on the telephone with Mrs. Habecker on March 18, 1988. V. RECgMEMDATION: Staff recoanends that the Hlstorlc Preservation oaw s~ recawend to the City Council that thgy adopt a Resolution designating the Adars House as Hlstorlc Landaerk Na. 28 because 1t Heels the criteria established 1n the Historic Preservation Ordinance. Respectfully subeltted, v~,i ~ Larry Henderson Senior Planner LH:AB:ko Attacharents: Exhibit "A' - Location Map Exhibit 'B" - Application Por Historic Landaark Designation Exhibit "C" - Historic Resources Survey Fora Exhibit "D" - Resolu4lons ~~S' 8~~• Lines Road Dr .'NORTH CITY OF RA1~1('~-(O CL'G~:~IONC~ HISTORIC PRE~9ERVATION COMMI88ION ~: TITLE . EXHIBIT ~~~ SCALE 13. Condition: Exee!lent .]LGOaa _ Fair_ Deteriorated _ No longer in existence _ 74. Alteration: NOhe apDd rant 15. Surround ngs: {Check more than one if naeesnryl Open IanO _$pttered buildings _ Dmuly builbup X Rnidential_~!ndustrial _Lpmmerutial _Omer: 18. T'nreats tp site: None knawn~Fivm tlav<lopment_ Zoning _ VaMalism Public Works projeR _ Other: 17. to the strueNra: On in original sin? X Moved? Unknown? 7& RelatMfaswres: N/A SIGNIFICANCE 19. Bristly stare histariol and/or architectural importanu linclude dates, events, and wrspm azmtiated wish the site.) Built in 1935 by Paul and Margaret Adams, this house is the third house to be built on Red Hill. The Adams were very early members of the Red Hill Country Club. Paul Adams was the manager of the Cucamonga Citrus Association and later the Alta Loma Citrus Association. They were very active within the community. This represented a trend to establish the area known as Red Hill as an exclusive neighborhood. Prior to this, most homes within the community were built on the large parcels of land, or on the city lots. Beginning in the early thirties, there developed a need to establish a separate identity from the newer residents. Most of the early residences on Red Hill were built by either older, established families tvi thin the community who had earned their wealth from hard work. usually derived from the land or by newcomers with some social standing. These people were usually in positions of importance within the community, and attempted to establish an image of success by, in effect, moving up the hill. Some of the families achieved wealth through their own endeavors, while others utilized family inheritance as a method of establishing social importance. Zp. Main theme of the historic resource: (If more Man one is checked, number in order of importance.) Architaaure Arti @ Leiwn Ewnpmic; Indus:r,al ~Explor:tian/San:xnmi Government Military Reli9wn Social/Education 21. Sources (List books, oocunsents, surveys, personal interviews arq Mair dated. "A Field Guide to American Houses," Vig- ginia 8 Lee McAlester; San Bernardino Co. Assessor Records; personal interview with Ada Cooper, Npvember 1967. T2. Date form prepared tlnvnmher 1487 By Inamel Lvnn Fle rri 11 city _ Phpne: zip Y ~~ Loutional sketch map (draw aM IaWI zin and surrounding rtreets, roads, and prominent landmarksl: NORTH stn. of calrorn;. - Tn. Rswr APnw DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER FILE HISTORIC RESOURCES DATA ENCODING SHEET NOTE: Tha numben in par~thesn iMinta eimar ma number G antar,d er the mxlbx et lirw that may M dlaeked 1. Sar. No. 1730 23 City Zip (41 Form No. (141 Prop. No. (041 USGS Ouad Map No. 141 2452 of charmers Osnan, numWn, punctuation marks, spans) that mry 10. Registration Status 111: _ 11 listed -den I61~ _41 mry become eligihla _2l denrmined eligible- _5l eligible lonl lining year 121 _fil ineligiNa for above Eaap X 31 apnan eligible _71 unwnrminetl 2 UTM Zoii(21 44 1 N~Dhi~~~1 q 4 5 / / 11. Property Given Re~strotion Starve u 111: 8 C _71 Pxt of distritt D X21 individual Property _3! ^_eM! et above 3, property Name: Comm N%A me 1301: 12. NR qaa Gte9ory (11: Mirtorie Nams (401: Adams House parnl No, 10171 0201-073-09 4. Addren: 7914 Alta Cuesta Drive umber 1 ~ Stmt Name (4.201 Nearest Gou Street (0201 Rancho Cucamonga CiN/Town 13-201 91730 Vicinity of Zip code 151 CirylTovm (~ County 3~latter dxignatn 13! 5. Type of Ownership 17 ~71= _„ 11 unknown _ 21 federal 31 rtaro 6. Present Use 11-e1: _11 unknown _21 commercial X 31 residential SBD ~_4) privan _51 county 8) city .,_ 7) special distritt _41 privan ram<omm. _ 5) public _61 none 7. Veer of Initial Construction: Individual Pronrty 141 1935 Gisirici (o'~ 8. Archinetls110~251: unknown _~) distrim - No. of properties (031 21 tin ~31 buildlnq _41 snueturo ~5) ohjact 13. Odlx Ragiatracon 1081 _11Hirtarie Am. Blg. Survey ._81 GI. Historinl Landmark -21 Historic Am. Enq. Ree 71 County PC of Hiat Innrost ~ _31 National Hist Landmark el Local Listing _4) Saa Hirtolic Park _91 County/Regional Park _51 oNv 14. Property Attnhutas: 11 unknovm _T21 Iske/river/romrvoir ~Cm _ ram .e:n -31 mutt family prop. --341 lighthouse _41 ancillary blg, _15) amusement park -51 honl/moral _281 monument{mural/gravestone _ fil cnmm, blq, 1-3 st. _27) folk art _ 71 comm. blg. over 3 st _281 stmt furniture e, 81 industrial b1g. ._281 landsrape architr. _ 91 Public utility Wg. -301 tmshagention _101 theatre X11 urban open span _111 engirnxing rtrutt. -321 rural onn space _t2l civic auditorium _.331 farm/ranch _131 cmnN ntrhoc. hall -341 military Property _141 government bl4 -35) CCC/WPA strvcture _151 edugtiond blg. _381 atonic minority property -161 roligicus hlg, ethnic group (5.201 _171 R/R Depot _181 train _371 highvvav/trail _lgl endga -361 wtRnenY property -101 anal/pueduct -401 amevry X11 dam _381 other Budderls110@Sb 15. Architectural Plans Paul and Margaret Adams ~ and Spaeifintions: vas )C No 9. Vaar of Survey 121: 1981 DPR 680 iRav. 12/631 / n ~y Stata o~ Caido.n:a - Tie Resourcx, Agmcv 'J eG.1RTNEVT OG PeR KS ANO aC-CR EATON HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY IOENTi FICATION 1. Common name: Ser. No. HA35_'-IAER_Loc SHL Na._ '.; T!A: A .. a n V R Status- 2. Nismnc name: ^adms ^~use 3. Street or rural address: 79!4 Al td Celesta t9Y, c;w Rancho Cucamonga Z;p °1730 cn~nty San "perna rdi no a„ Parcel number: v"cu7-G7i-0> a. Present owner John and Ann 4abecker Adnress: Clty Z:G Ownersmp m: Puhlic private x 5. Present Use; Re; l derce Or:glnai use: 8251 denC2 DESCRIPTION 7a. Architenural sp~le; P10^terey ]b. Bnefly descn be the present physical appearance of Iha site or structure antl describe any major alterations from its original contlition: A single story el shaaed structure of wood and stucco construction. Roof is frent and side gable with red tile. Eaves are exposed. Siding material is smooth, white stucco. Windows are paired casement with flase shutters. Front door is wood with mul tipie glass pane. "here is a ceu rtyard lcca ted within the shape of the el. "-'; has Seen fi.,i shed with red brick, and is cnmpl am2nted by a tall decorative fenc that screens the^courtyard from the street. A separate front Gable garage is lo- cated in the front o`. the structm~e, with z circulular driveway comolz±ing the crane. There is mature landscaoinq, and the structure is tied into the rest or the area through its placement on the prepe rty. 8. Consruction date: Ivjj Estmated~ Factual __ 9. Archireci un known :~. Paul ~ Q 'la rca rot "dams I1. APpro%, property site (ln 'eetl Frontage Oevth__ or appron. acreage 'Jnkn CY!^ 12. Datelsl of enclosed ohotagraph lsl ,ly lg?, ~~C/`j OPR 5231Rev. 11:851 Clty of Rancho Cacamoaga ADDlicatloa for flIBTORIC I.AIIDYAR[ p89IR(ATIDR eIBTOeIC POIflT OY IRT8R8Sf D891fd/ATI011 _~-Diatoric Wodaurk 8lstoric Poioc of Iatereat e IDBNTIYICATIOfl 1. Coaon Saari 1. 8latorlc 8aala, if kaora: Aeaas Nouae 3. 8traet or Rural Addrur. ]91a Alta cuesta Drive _' Clty: Rancho Cucamnaa Z30: 91730 County: San Aemardinw AuHaOr'Y Duaal No. 20 7_D73-o9 Zoar: Inv awxiAwntial Iw(al DaaarlOtlOat Tract N n_ 9iflfi. Into > aM A ~. Prawnt Owaar, St kaoaa: a non b Ann Habnrkwr Addraan 7916 alto cue<xa Dr. CSLy: ~ncho Cucaaonaa 21pt 91938 DwnrahlD iu publln , Drina~_ S. Pratnat Ow: Shale Fuily R esidence Or181ae1 Opt Sinale Faaily o.xidence Other put assn D69CRIDTI08 8. Br1r117 daaarlhr the D»pat D aical araaar or the site or atrvctara and drwrlba aq aaa or a twat oaa ram its orlaiaal coadlt.toa: ;h7s is a L'~sraoed Saantsh Calcntal Rayf val structure vl to , red rile roof an0 smooth white stucco exterior. A courtyard fs within the U. w7ndews dre n,ir,d ra<sna .M •w, emne nm. to wV~d ..uw ~.~u,.l... .. Neavy woad pasts support an attached porch on the east s1de. A full view of the house can be seen iron the Aed N111 Countrys Club Darking lot. 7. Location akrteh map (dry \ 3aDa1 9. Approxluta property nize: Bite sad aurroundin( streets, Lot 91za '1R tees) rondo, sad Drwlaazt landurka ): iroata8a Depth or aDDrox. aanaq 9. Condition; (ahrak ono) a. Sxcallent-~ 6. pond- c. yalr_ d. Datrrloratad~ •, 80 loons to ax isteoce_ 10. to LDr taatun: a. Altarad7~ b. UoaltrrrdTaooarently 11. Surrouadiopt (check eaora [ha one 1f arenury) a. Opra land r ~.. D. Reaidaat ial r c. 9eattrrad Du11d1n8s_ d. Danaaly Duilt-ups lJ J" 79. Threats to SSta: •. Noss kaowe~ h. Private develop.ee!_ c. Zooing_ d, Punlie sorb Pro~oct_ •. Vaodaliae_ L Dthae~ 33. Dates of aacloaod photograph(s) "' NCTgi The fo11oe1ag (Stems 2A-1B) era [or structures only. _ 11. Primary exterior bu11tl1ng uterlal: •. 9tooe b. crick c. 9tucco~(_ d. Adoha_ e. lood_ t. Other is. Is the 8trnctuzei a. Oe 3L• orlgisal •iteT x ~. Yoved7 c. Lokaornt le. pear of Iaitlal Coast ructiop: Thie Data Se: •. }actual 1935 h. Estimated 37. Architwt (!f kooao) 18. 8u11der (SS knon)e_ 18. Misted haturee: a. Barn n. Cuelap neuM C. Outhouw d. ghed(e) •. lorMl Gardsa(d L ^iadmill g, latertowr/twkhouw n. Other_aar„ge 1. Yoe. SIGNIPSCANCE 20. Brlelly state Oletor3cal wd/or arohftwtural leportaow (icclude daLU, swats, wd Deeeogs usoniated .Ito the •Ste rheo kooan l: Said to M thw thfM hnu<e nn RM N111 atilt he taw 6Aaw. { w11 i S Fin x "^7 of coani•h Gglpetal Revival ar<M Lecture. Adaa< Geily vac acH V. in c it life. Paul Adas was the na r f t n 1 a ~ and later the Alta Lana Citrus Assac. Conlrioutes to the anbience of fled Hit]. 21. Wio theq of the historic rawurca: (cheek Delp one): a. Arcnltecture n. Arta 1 [wisure c. Economic/Iodmtrial d. Goverment e. Exploration/3ettlemept f. Yilitarp g. Raligloo n. Social/Education 22, Sources: [.let nook e, documents, surveys, personal Sntervieaa, ¢ntl their datsa: ~aie_Survev Fore. Nnv. i9xl a Fbtn n,dnw tw e.e.f.... Hou< < V'r' f i L M e7 L B tli A 0. d Intervleus rn th Ada Cooper; Conversation ~aith Mr. Habecker. 23. Date tore prepared March. 1988 By (new ): Arlene Banks Addner. City: 21p:~ Phone: Cagan i2at loot ~~/ RESOLUTION N0. 88-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COIMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA RECOMMEi81ING APPROVAL Of HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION N0. 29 TO DESIGNATE THE "ADAMS HOUSE" LOCATED AT 7914 ALTA CUESTA DRIVE AS HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION N0. 29 NHEREfS, u,e Historic Preservation Commission had held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Historic Landmark Designation No. 29. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission hereby ma es a ollowing findings: A. The proposed landmark is particulariy representative of an historical period, type, style, region, or wAy of life. B. The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned, important or local personality. C. The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark 1s beautiful or its details and materials arc beautiful or unusual. D. The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. E. The proposed landmark 1n its location represents an established ana ramiiiar visual reature or the nelgnborhood community, or city. SECTION 2: Designation of a landmark 1s exempt from CEQA. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLYED, that the Rancho Cucamonga H±storlc Preservation Commission does hereby recommend approval of Historic Landmark Designation No. 29 to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 1988. HISTORCIC PkESERVATIO ISSI~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA aoo xnmiet, cnairman AYES: COMMISSIONERS: COOPER, ARNER, BANKS, BILLINGS, SCHMIUT, STAMM, NASKVITZ NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: CQTIISSIONERS: NONE Y ~~ RESOLUTION N0. ? ~ ' v~ a~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC lAlA1N1lRII N0. 29 TO DESIGNATE THE `ADAMS HOUSE" LOCATED AT 7914 ALTA CUESTA ORIYE AS HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION N0. 29. NHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Coawlssion has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider ail caam~ents on the proposed Historic Landmark Designation No. 29 and issued Resolution No. 88-03 recommending to this City Council that said Historic Landmark Designation be approved. NHEREAS, the City Council has received and reviewed all lmput from the Historic Preservation Caaisslon regarding said Historic Landmark Designation. SECTION 1: The Rancho CucamongA City Council hereby makes the following n ngs: A. The proposed landmark 1s particularly representative of an historical period, type, style, region, or MAY of 11fe. D. The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned, important or local personality. C. The overall effect of the design of the orooosed ianamerR is oeauttful or its details and materials are beautiful or unusual. D. The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. E. The proposed landmark to its loca4lon represents an estabN shed and fam111ar visual feature of the neighborhood caamwnity, or city. NON, THEREFORE, RE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga CTty Council does hereby approve the Historic Landmark Designation No. 29. (f's3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DgTE: May 4, 1988 T0: Chairman and Members of 4he Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Larry Henderson, Associate Planner Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: HISTORIC LAImMARK DESIGNATION OF 12467 BASE LINE ROAD THE REGIIOC - - an RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Pianning Commission recommends that the Dune slgnate 12467 Base Ltne Road, the Regina Minery also known as the Ellena Brothers Minery, as Historic Landmark No. 30 with the adoption oP the attached Resolution. BACKGROUND: The Regina/Ellena Brothers NTnery is owned by Nabisco ran s, nc. and is used to process grapes into cooking wines, wine vinegar and cooking sherries. The caaplex of bu7ldings was selected from the list of potential landmarks identified in the 1987 Survny of Historic Resources. The General Plan specifically encourages preservation of wineries. ThTs winery belonged to the Ellena family, longstanding residents of Etiwanda. It has historic and cultural significance and is a familiar visual feature of the community. HISTORIC PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Historie Planning Commission e a pu c ear ng on pr 1988 and passed a Resolution recommnending designation of the Regina Ninety also known as the Ellena Brothers Ninety, located at 12467 Base Line Road, as Historic Landmark No. 30. The Historic Planning Commission also directed staff to explore Lhe possibility of a Historic Overlay Zone which would allow a non- conforming use such as this winery to change and expand with a Ccnditianat Usz Fznnit arovidzd the chanane a.w not d_aerimaneal en surrounding land uses and provided that the changes are beneficial to the City and the landmark. yS/ PLANNING CQ4IISSION STAFF REPORT HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION - 12467 DASE LINE R0. May 4, 1988 Page 2 Respectfully submitted, Brad Bui er City Planner BB:LH:,1s Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Staff Report with attachaents Exhibit "B" -Drawing of Base L1ne widening Exhibit "C" - Resolution E~S~ ~ ~~ ~~2~. i i~ I i r i i I ~ , ~~~ :+ ~. G~ 1 i ~~ ~ 'o ______ ~ Z I' ~' ~' I ~' ~' II ;_~ i , ~~ I,_~ o ~~ ~' ti ~ ~~ ,~ 1 ~I----- y d ~y ~~ ~__r---t '~ va ~ '~' ci ~ ~a , N -~- - -~ ' ` ~ ysfn d O ~ A U ~ O x U t7 U l~TTV ALA D A TT(~i T(1 !~T i/1 A ll/~li lr STAFF REPORT ~~'~~ , "°~ ~iI of I'^ DATE: April 7, 1988 ~~I~ ~ Its 1977 T0: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Camisslon FRry!: Lam Hender;un, Senior --rlanner 8Y: Ariene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: HISTDRIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION N0. 31 - CITY OF RANCHO propose o esrgna a sco ran s, nc. eg na Cooking Wine and Nine Yinegar facility/Ellena Brothers Winery located at 12467 Base Line Road as Historical LanBwrk No. 31 - APN: 227-161-10 and 24. I. PROJECT ANO SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Location: The site is located on the south side of Base Line oR ate, west of Yictoria Park Lane and east of Hanley Avenue. It 1s surrounded by the 4ictorla Planned Comawnity. B. Site Area: The building complex is on a parcel of 6.98 acres w a acre parcei to the south that has wastewater oonds. C. Existing Land Use and Zoning: The site is currentiy being used as a fac y o process grapes into wine vinegar, cooking wines and sherries, and to bottle Nright's Hickory LT quid Smoke. The property is zone6 High Density Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre). D. Surroundin Land Use and Zonin r - rape neyar um High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) and Village Camperctal Center South - Vacant; High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Planned ComnunTty East - Fa+m Buildings; High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) within the Yictoria Planned Caasm,n itv West - Camper Storage Yard; Zoned for Church within the - Ylctoria Planned Community ~$ 7 ITEM C NPC STAFF REPORT RE: HLD 31 April 7, 1988 Page 2 E. General Plan Desi nations: ro ec e - gi of sf~ntial (24-30 dwelling units per acre) North - Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) South - High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) East - Hiyh Residential 12$-33 dwelling units per acre] Nest - Neighborhood Commercial F. Site Characterl5tics: The site is an island within the c or a anne ommunity and the topography 1s relatively flat. To the east of the buildfngs is a parking lot and picnic grounds that were constructed to accommodate a restaurant and deli that were once housed 1n the easternmost building. The grounds are paved and almost entirely bare of landscaping. To the east is a windrow of Eucalyptus trees and a residence with fare buildings. Most of the surrounding area is undeveloped. Same of the winery buildings are within a few feet of Base Line Road. The old restaurant, which wraps around the Ellena Nouse, is empty, but all other buildings are used in the processing of grapes into cooking wine, etc. A portion of the facility is used to bottle wright's Hickory Liquid Smoke. The facility appears to be in goad condition and is well kept. The southern portion of the site has been graded to accommodate wastewater ponds that are used 1n the plant's operation. II. ANALYSIS: A.Background: The Nabisco Brands, Inc. Regina Cookery Wine and nAi e~egar facility, also known as the fonder Ellena Brothers winery is made up of severai buildings constructed over many years in which grapes are processed into wine, and wine into wine vinegar, flavored cooking wines, and cooking sherries. Ellena Brothers also produced table wines at the facility at one time. The buildings house huge storage containers, bottling machinery, a distillery, cooling machinery, sherry cookers, fermenting tanks, pressing machinery, as well as facili*_ies for bottling Htckary Ltauid Smoke. A section agiacent to the former restaurant contains the current office and a portion of the facility formerly used to bottle wine is now an employee dining room. The restaurant portion was built around the Ellena House whose first floor outer walls and windows are now inside. The original wine cellar still exists. According to Mrs. Arnold Ellena, widow of the youngest of the Ellena Brothers, the house y~ HPC STAFF REPORT RE: HLO 3Y April 7, 1988 Page 3 at the very least predated her father-in-law Claudio Ellena's death which was in 1920 when her husband was seven years old. The restaurant was constructed in the late 1960's in Mediterranean style architecture. Its entrance can be seen on the north side of the easternmost building. The empty restaurant is cavernous. The pi ant supervisor, Eugent L. Cherpin, who kindly gave staff a tour of the plant, said that Ronald Reagan ate at the restaurant a number of times while he was Governor of California. It closed in the 1970's. For a while, it was used as a Lion's Club facility. Adjacent to the old house are buildings constructed in the 1930's for the winery and added to over the years. Mrs. Eltena said that the huge building west of the house, the most attractive building in the complex, had already been constructed by 1936, the year of her marriage. The buildings contain bottling roams, offices, large epoxy-lined tanks, and a wine laboratory. A chilling roam 1s filled with enon~ous round redwood tanks, the largest of which holds 31,000 gallons. Outside stands a stainless steel tank that holds 350,000 gallons. It was constructed in 19811. The tallest structure on the property 1s a distillery which uses by-products from the wine to make 190 proof alcohoi which 1s used to fortify the sherries. The still is relatively new, Dut the corrugated metal bulldiny in which it is housed was constructed in the 193u's. Mother building on the property contains a fermenting roam. Over the entry, the words "ELLENA BROS. 1945° are Pressed into concrete. The "N" in "ELLENA" is backwards. The outdoor grape crusher is on the western end of the property. During grape season, August 15 to October 30, trucks loaded with grapes dump up to 500 tons a ddy of the fruit into the crusher. The overall environment is that of a clean and smoothly running facility. The odor of wine permeates the air inside many of the buildings. During the period that the plan for the Victoria Planned Camnunity was being developed, the property was owned by liephl nTn~ a Ird{cared or the SCectf!c P'. art maps. It is sham as "not apart" of the Yictoria Planned Community. Assessor records indicate that the current owners are Del Monte. The plant supervisor explained that Del Monte and Nabisco Brands are divisions of R.J. Reynolds and that the Regina plant was recently switched from the Del Monte to the Nabisco division. `jJ / HPC STAFF REPORT RE: HLD 31 April 7, 1988 Page 4 The architecture of the complex is utilitarian and overall does not present a cohesive appearance, but the 1930'5 buildings are somewhat attractive. The significance of this complex, however, does not depend on its architecture. u. Significance of Eiiena Brothers Hinery: Historic Back _round: According to `Cucamonga Hines and Pines", a~983--Claremont Graduate School Master of Ar_s thesis written by James D. Hofer, Claudio Ellena came to the Cucamonga area from Italy by way of Australia, and early 1n the century he planted vineyards near Ettwanda. A photograph of the winery on Page 59 1n Ettwanda The First 100 Years, published 1n 1982, indicates a-frl-E-t a w~~ buiTi-'fn 1906, but James Hofer's thesis says that James and Frank Eiiena, two of Claudio Ellena's sons, began operating their winery in 1933. The Historic Resources inventory Fora gives an estimated date of 1937 for the buildings. It seems likely that the original Ellena house was built in 1906 (and contained a small winery to the cellar), whereas the complex of buildings that make up the winery today began when Prohibition was ending in 1933. The brothers made the sweet wines this area was fasous for as well as chamoaene, brandies. and Italian-ctvlP reA tahla wines. ThGy also produced Regina brand wine vinegar and cooking wines. John Ellena served as President of the Ellena Brothers Corporation, and was Chairman of the Board of the Mine Institute at the tints! that he gave an address to the Hine Vinegar Board to 1956. He was also a member of the State Htne Board. Frank Ellena was for many years a member of the Ettwanda School Board. This Hinery has been 1n its present location for more than fifty years and was run by a well-known Ettwanda family. Regina brand wine products have been produced here for more than fifty years and continue to be produced here. 2. City Policies The current General Plan clearly supports the preservation of wineries. The following statement 1s on Page 164 of the Community Design Section Landmarks and Focal Points Policies of the 1984 Rancho Cucamonga General Plan: ~(~D HPC STAFF REPORT RE: HLD 31 April 7, 1988 Page 5 "Vineries have played a significant role in the culture and heritage of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Existing wineries that operate for the purpose of selling bottled wine, or as a historic landmark should be allowed to continue to operate and expand their operations to include resWUrants, retail wine sales, gift shops, and other related activity. It is not ceant Lo encourage new wineries to begin operation within the City, but to preserve those wineries currently in operation." On Page 123 of the Community Design Section of the the General Plan says: 'The image of Rancho Cucamonga Ts defined largely by its physical and historic context. The City has evolved from three small rural communities, Alta Lama, Cucamonga, and EtTManda; and this agriculturai heritage is important to itc 1Aantity. VinnvanA< anA wineries provide visual ties to that heritage. As the City becomes increasingly urban, aay recollection of that historic image could easily be lost. While 1t is not feasible to preserve the area's fonaer rural function, it is possible to retain associative ties with the past." There are other statements in the General Plan that do not mention wineries directly, but which can be interpreted to support preservation of wineries such as this one. For example, Page 124 says, " .. i0 eiranethnn Oho im__a_nn_ anA identity of~ the City, ~ future development and public improvement should..preserve and deveiop elements of the City's built form which provide a sense of its origins and history..." `~ HPC STAFF REPORT RE: NLD 31 April 7, 1988 Page 6 The E11ena Brothers Winery is a highly visible landmark that has been and continues to be a part of the area's historic wine industry. Thus, despite the fact that the winery is not housed in buildings of outstanding architectural value, it is none the less significant. C. Issues: The Nabisco Brands, Inc. Regina Cooking Mine and Nine Y~egar plant is a non-conforming industrial use, since it is zoned for residential use. The winery 1s currently restricted from making changes that wouid increase the degree of non- conformity; therefore the plant cannot expand. Mother issue is the widening of Base Line Road. The buildings are only a few feet fray the current roadwaly and will be a problem 1f and when the road is widened. A third issue is tfie appearance of the winery. The collection of buildings does not vlsuaily communicate to the public that tt is a winery. D. Environmental Assessment: Designation of a landmark is exempt ran ., requ remen s ttcle 14, Section 15308). III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Criteria in the Ordinance that staff thinks are app ca a are es follows: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: 1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical period, type, style, region, or way of life. 2. The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned, Important, or local personality. 3. The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. B. Neighborhood and Geographic Settlna: 1. The CroCOSed landrark in Its lxatton reoresMntf as established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community or city. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing nT-TFie~atT~Ce ort newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices sen o a property owners within 300 feet of the site. The property owners have been notified and staff talked with the plant supervisor on March 22, 1988. `/ f~~ HPC STAFF REPORT RE: NLD 31 April 7, 1988 Page 7 Y. RECgMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation amm s~C~ion recaawend to the City Council that they adopt a Resolution designating the Ellena Brothers Vinery as Historic Landmwrk No. 31 because it meets the criteria established in the Historic Preservatfon Ordinance, as weii as being in canformwnce with the City's General Plan. Other recaamendattons to address the issues stated previously are as follows: 1. rnat the Historic Preservation Casisston direct staff to explore the possibility of developing a NTstorlc Overlaiy Zone within vfilch non-conforsing uses such as this winery wouid be allowed with a Conditional Use Perwit to change and expand 1n ways that are beneficial to the City and to the land ark. 2. That the City work with the owner of the landmwrk on the issue of street widening 1n the future. Landaxrk status is for the use rather than for the architecture and should not prevent same accaemodatlor. for the future road. 3. That the City encourage the owners to continue to use the facility as a winery and to present a higher profile as a winery. In addition, through the mechanism of a Special Overlay Zone and a Conditional Use Permit, the City should encourage the owners to alter or add to their buildings to meet their needs and in the future possibly to develop the site or a portion of the site as a wine-related retail/commercial facility. Res ectfulty submitted, ~ ~ ~1 rry He Berson Sent or Planner LH:AB:ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Slte Location Nithin Victoria Exhibit "C" - Photograph from Etiwanda, the First 100 Years ExhibiE-"if"- State Historic Resources Inventory Form Exhibit "E" - Photographs of Site Exhibit "F" - Copy of Photographs From Regfna Publicity Material Resolutions ~~~ Y O Y~ ° ,.c x ___ < ln V ~ F~PE• E'¢d FC EF ~ c ~. .O n ~ ; F v - . £ 3 =t a m F w j .,, _ Fi _ a ~Fi~2F,i F3i=i r.Es-vi z B 1" 3 = is 'FE ~ v'Sci$_c vin; a ~G N O W j a E• e. ~ 4 9 ~ °d ' 2 ~ 0 r ~1 .. . y ., . .. ~ z e .~ 0 n w'µy 11 _• oFJ .i n - .. .. ~ 0 ... ... w ro ~ ev..=• R ~~ r r Iri ze.e:w¢ewzaaxzxzzcz S :a ev: :. ~:e: i i A O o O 2 r t ~ z +~ m o n m a ~ te ~ { ~ r ~ t 'a' ' I ' t Y F i, ~ i ` ® -..¢..~..1 3. P , e 1 ' ~r.uo ® ~ Q 7 9 ~ K I © E ~ 3~Ei ~ ~ ' ~ •i ' C ~ 5 ~.~~ ® ~ [ ~ ~ ii ~ 4 3 . Z ~ ~f 1: II 11 ~ V ; 4 P ~' ® V ~8 ( _. j.. ._ N C 8 n Iff~~~ ( _ ' ~ _ = ~ F w ~ E a ~ A N V 4, ~ Q ~ ~ u ~ ~Lc.~Yl`. - U a ~ 3 4 E ~ a 1. ~ m • J ®~ O ~ V J ii i 1 ~~~ 1 Ix + ~ .I' I 1 _ m - ~ I^ l n r ~ W '~ 1 o i © ~'< ~ , o ; 1 S O ~ iQ1 ' o ~ ~ : . N ~ ~ N N M C ~ . ~ ~~ ~ I. i ~ N N ~ R S P A I ` 1 N ~ S ~ W, ~ ~ ,+ N a f ~ N > y ` m ti In F O 9 O r x ~ - S GY '4 m O n m > i~ 3' • A~ O 6 f i ^ • 0 i 2 O S • r 0 e • a 3 • v t << L~~ c~ _..._ ~->~ ; _ ' I ~ ,, al r'. 1 ~It~" ~~ _ ~t~~~. 9 ~. _ g~~~ ~~ + ^~l 5•t, t 81to Loutlon ~~ ~) I _ _~~,,,,j_-•~-~ 14407 Oaoo Uno ++ 1 w 1 * .~ i...+. ~ ;! 1 • ^ ~'' 1. L ~ ~ ~ . '~'~~ w 1 1 s t{5 ;~ ~~k. s 1 'll.~.°___ m~ .. - ~~.~._ i ~ _ t _ m ~~ ,, m ~~ -~ a /'e~ 'S VS•a3d?!6' ~ O ~.. I ~ ~ o ___ f/ / ~~ V ~I .~. - ~ .ti n Wltllo C ~'t't CI 1 i vi' f('EM: ~lDioco Br~nO• Inc. R A 7~Tr~T_Y\ !~T /'~ ~ ~ yy~!'~ ~ p~ytn~ Cookln~ Wln~ •i CL ~Ilyi 1V 1.1~1L1,V1lA hJ!'1 •rt'('~: wlnn Yln~atar FOCIIItr HISTORIC PRESERVATION EXHttitT: SGLE COMMISSION ['~s- From Eti Wanda The First 100 Years September 17,1982 V ;NORTH \:~~IRJ CL~`]iVlt/1 Vllll HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ITE~1: N.Ol~eo lr.n0• Ino. •9 n• oo ny n• rrrt.e: _ wln. Vln.aar F.ollltr 11:4111BfT 5C.ALF. 7~~ I! iM1' ^x~1me Rmd Illrnd Pr. ~. g~R~na Uinen baill m I'MN.. rvm' nn naJ b. i hu lulu n r n $oP al Calibrnia-The RarourM AefnaY Ser. NO. 173D ~ 21 DEPARTMENT OG PgRKS AND RECRE4TION MAaS_HAER_Loo-~SMI No._Nfl Statuf__ uTM: q 11-450910-377fi600 c HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY B D IDENTIFICATION Del Monte Packing House 1. Common name: 2. Mirtorfaname: Ellena Brothers Winery 3. strut ar rare! sddraw: 12467 Baseline Rd. ctr, Rancho Cucamonga _ - Zp 91739 ~w,N San Bernardino 4. Parul numWr: 0227-161-24 5. Prevent owner: Del Monte Corporation Addrm: 1 Market Plaza, Box 375 City $dn Franc 15C0 Zip 94119 ownership is Public Privan a Prevent uw: Warehouse origirMl uw: DESCRIPTION 7a. ArdlitecturN style: N/A 7b. Briefly dwcriM the Prevent Phytlwl ppeesance of the da or ftructun end describe any melw Nteretiom hom io ori9inN condition: An irregular shaped industrial complex consisting of several structures. Structure 1 - A two story irregular shaped structure of concrete construction. Roof is high hipped, with centrally located ventilators along the ridge with com- posit shingles. Siding is poured concrete with buttresses. Windows are multipane wood that are recessed into the walls. Front office area has al urTli rum and g', ass windows and doors and are not original. Structure 2 - A two story irregular shaped structure of wood and stuccD construction. KUDI la IIICU iuw ycvic n o'rL]i - `~'.'.~~^` eed raf}Rrc Bud beams. UD02r story windows are multipane casement with extended lugsill. Wrought iron bars are located across these windows, First floor is hidden behind a tall concrete block wall. Structure 3 through 5 -Large irregular shaped warehouse structures of corrugated construct on. 0 significance is an enclosed tower located along the street, with low gable roof, corrugated roof and siding. Windows are small rectangular glass panes with wood trim, with same windows boarded. There is a large, multiple storage tank located on the property of steel construction, with internal bracing and cat- walks. There are no significant landscape features surrounding this site. ARiM Photo EnvNOpe Nan a. Construction dm: Ertimeted ~._ FactuN __ 9. Archintt rn4nnwn 10. Builder lnhn R Fran4 Fl lane 11. APpro%. Property Nse (in hNl Frontage Depen__ or appro%. egeeye fi _qA -- 14. Dealel of endows MotograPhld July 1987 OPR a131Rw. 11/851 `7 1° 13. Condition: Excellent -Good ,~_ Fair_ Deteriorated _ No longer in exitten<e it. Altarationa: Vari0u5 windows and doors boarded. None apparent 15, Surrouri6ngs: (Cheek mon than pne if nec•varyl Otwn land ~Snnved Wildings _ Oenseltl builtap Rnioential _IndtutriN X Cpmmerdal -Other: id Threat/ to sitr. Nona known ~Pflyat• d•velopment_ 2pninq _ Vandalism e Public Works project _ Other: 17. Is me ttrueture: On in wi9inal sit•7 X Mpvadl _ Unkmwnt id 'n•ined features: Vi nnoa rd< le~a4ur1 to 5ni~th of .i to SIGNIFICANCE 19. BriaHy rtaro hirtorigl antl/or ar<hita<tural importance (indud• datai, •vanv, and p•rspna associated with the site.l John Ellena: Member of State Wine Board, involved in state wine legislation. Ellena family came to Etiwanda in 1920. Winery epitomized the mainstay of the Cucamonga-Etiwanda economy: vineyards. Ellena family were major agri cul turat and owners in Southern California. Frank Ellena member of Etiwanda School Board for years. 20. Main [hems of the historic resourn: Ilf more than ono is checked, numban in order o} impprtan4.) Arrhiteaun Artsy Uiwn Economic/IrMUttriN ~Explorttiont5•ttl•m•nt Govrnmoni Milivry RNigwn SodN/Edtscrtion Zt. Sources (List books, doammv, wrv•ys, p•non•1 int•rvi•wa and Msir datnl. San Bernardino County lax Assessor Records 22 Oau form prepared October 1987 Uxational tkrtch map (tlraw arM I•MI sin and wrrounding rtra•ts, roads, and prominent landmarksl: et/ lnam•1 Lvnn (lerrill 1~l Organization Addrms: ~(irvA~tt7lskfRq Ciry Zip Phonc -/ ~ V City of 1laacho CucwaRa ApDifcatloo for RISTORIC LANDYARB D89IGRATIOR 819TOBIC POINT OP IRT8R89T D89IOHATION % HSator3c Landmark RSeLOrlc Polet of Iatereat IDBNTIIICATIOIP 1. Coaaao Nw: Nabisco Brands. (nc, Reolna Cooki nc Nine and Nine Yineaar Facility Z. Niatorio Nw, 11 kaowa: Ellena 9rothers Ylnerv 3. Street os Rural Adareo: 12167 Base L!ne ~ CStyt Rancho L axon a ZSDt 91739 County: San Be rnardi ro - 1-2a znd Aawewr'e Parael flo. n7_t6t_ID Zotu Leeal DeacrlDtloat ~. PrneaL Owns, it kaowai Nabisco. tnc. Addreu:100 De Forest Ave. C ltrt East Nanover. Nd 21D: 07936 Owaerablp tat pablla pTiyab S. PreNat Dpt Ytner fob ravine rinse°r,OriRinal Dwt Yinerv and Mme CCooookkiing shheerry Otber put uMn Restaurant/Oe11/Tasting Roam: Elks Club Meetino Dlace D88CRIPTION 8. Briefly describe the D»aeaL alcal a arauce of the alto or structure and dewriba aa1 ma or • Ura0 ooa rc~ Sta orialoal COediLl0a: !Sae State /nv¢ntarv Fcrm7 An irrecular shaawd Ind .<tria' n-'en consistfna of several buildlnas used fo orocess and stor .a n. ~ina,,....n nnYinn Yi,u< <M <1,•n nine 7. Locatloa sketch aaaD (draw a label site aed ausrouadlo8 et recta, roads, sad prwlteat taodaa-rbh 8. ADDronimate DroDSrty size: Lot 91ze (Se feet) Prootye Deptb or approx. street 9. Copoltio?: (c8~r~lo t5)ac, xd). parcel. a. 8xeslleot b. Gcod~ c. Pair d. Detarior-ted e. No lompe !o sxieteoca_ 10. Is the feature: a. Altered? b. Deal bred}Has than 9¢d oYer E~ vea 11. 9urrauodlotat (check more the oae it oswaaary) a. Opea laad_~ b. Raaideut!-1 c. 9cattersC buildiote_y d. Dante ly built-u0 ~~~ ~ 12. Threats to 81 b: a. Rorie kno:m__ b. Private devalopneot~ c. Zoolnr~_ d. PuDlio rarka ProlecL~ e. Vandallew_ t. Otber_ 13. Dates of enclowd photorsaPb(e) )-P7 ~ - NOTY: The Po11ow1nr (Iteu 14-19) are for et ructurea only. 1!. Pr Lary exterior bN11d1aa matarlal: a. 9toaa D. Brick c. 9tuew_,_ d. AdoDe_ e, rood-- t. Other con e, stuoe 13. Is the 9t ruature: a. Os Sts oririnai sit e7 t b. IbvedY c. Lnkaoent 19. year of Ialt ial CoeatrucLioa:jgj7. 1965. L90 - Original house was early This Date Ss: a. Tactual loa5 A t9xn D. Eat Lated 193) 20th century. 17. lrchitsct (3f taom) 18. Bsllder (it anom)s Jonn 8 Frank Ellena 19. Related HatYres: a. earo D. CarrlaP Douse a. Outhouma d. Bhed(s) e. /orpl aaran(s) f. riedmdll r. taLertoeee/tankDOSN h. Other 1. Nose 9IGNIYICMCB 20. Briefly state historical sad/or arahiteatural LporLanae (include data, events, and persons aseooiated with the Bite when knom ): I t F d Lff tl iM h 11A1 9 t li 4 with the once oaerful arson xnA wino induar~ fn rno ct1,,.nm rM1, cn e., fa ilr owne0 la a holtlinos on which then Plantetl vi nevards: in 1933 thev began • making and se111ng their own wine antler the gegina label. 21. W1n then of the 6latoric reeourcel (check only one)o a. Arcbitoctun D. Arta k Lelluze c. Bcoaomia/industrial % d. Govsramsdt e. Explaratioo/9att lament t. Yil Mary r. Relirlos h. Soc1-1/Education 22. Sources: LSnt books, documents, aurvaya, penooal Snterviewe, sad their dat u: .,~-^_ e•~ - -- -- .:,s.r orv f~i~~ R h 1 W k Y P Jaa• 1 ka vino ui th C. nonw fNrpfll, Diwni Supervisor, Acgtna Promoticnal Natertel.Plam .enrsrarhan wifk Hf.l#nN Ekenn• 23. Date form prep-Nd March. L9li8 By (naM ): Arlene anka Addrns; CLLY: Zip: _,_ Phone; _ OrRanftaT tom City c/ Rancho Cucamonga \t~ \~'~ ~~'i. `~ i ., ;' ~ ~ .. ! c~ ~~ { ^;,i ~ ~~I rl, ~ . ~ ~. ,. ,.. ~,-~ ;, 'W 3, ..; I,;'' .. ~ 4v. ~'~ ~ ,. f~ ;, - f^1 ~ <'i ' ~ ^ ... 1. ~ .l, 1~ ' '' 1' ~1.~ ' .. . ~~ ~ it 1'i `\ ~' n NaWwo Bnnd• Inc. ' 'R~pln• Cooking Wln• i Wlp~ Ylnopn Faolllty (Ellena l3cather5> - -From 1950'° ~-ochure ' ~~ ~.~ ~ ~~)i is> ~~ ~)I) ~:. 1, r~)~ ; ~: Regine Sran[ s aged in :his 1,000 gallor. capacity warehouse. N~Dl~co Br~nd• Inc. RsOlna Coo-rk~lnp win• 5 Wln• VIn~9~rJ-F1~clllty E ~Gn0. UrotllGrs 1 f /`~ ~, r~~ of E~dwoai `anks snc~. y, ...ese LJH3 PG, 1 of 2 ~-7~ 12467 BASELINE RD. (STRUCTURE il) 12467 BAS F.LINE RD. (STRUCTURE 121 PG,2 of 2 LJH3 Y ~Y' 12467 BASELINE RD. (STRUCTURE M3-S) RESOLUTION N0. 88-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCMIONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION N0. 3D TO DESIGNATE NABISCO BRANDS, INC./ELLENA BROTHERS NINERY LOCATED AT 12467 DASE LINE ROAD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AS HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION N0. 30 NHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission had held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all caawents on the proposed Historic Landmark Designation No. 30 SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission hereby ma ecl-fs Fe following findings: A. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of a historical period, type, style, region, or way of life. B. The proposed lanbnark was connected with someone renowned, important, or focal personality. C. The proposed landaark is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. D. The proposed landmark to its location represents an nefahliehnA anA ian111}n uleual inaMu~n nF •he neighborhood, caam~unity or city. SECTION 2: Designation of a landmark is exempt from CEQA. (Article 19, Section NON, THEREFORE, BE iT RESOLYED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission does hereby recommend approval of Historic Landnark Designation No. 30 to the City Council PROVoVED AND ADDDOPTED THIS 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 1988. BY: ~ O~'G-' Xl~r2 ~~~ o c m. a rman AYES: Cp4NISSIONERS: BANKS, AP.NER, BILLINGS, COOPER, SCHMIDT, STAMM HASKVITZ NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Y 7~ RESOLUTION N0. ~, G ~ ~ V f A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROYING HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION NG. 30 70 DESIGNATE THE REGINA #INERY ALSO KNONN AS THE ELLENA BROTHERS NINERY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE RDM AS HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION N0. 30 #HEP.£AS, the Historic Preservation Cardaission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider a71 camoents on the proposed Historic Landmark Designation No. 30 and issued Resoiution No. 98-05 recawmending to this City Council that said Historic Landmark Designation be approved. NHEREAS, the City Council has received and reviewed all input from the Historic Preservation Camtntssion regarding said Hlstorlc Landmark Designation. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga City eouncil hereby makes the following-findings: A. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical period, type, style, region, or wqy of life. B. The proposed landmark was connected with samaone renowned, important, or local personality. C. The proposed landmark is connected with a business ur uae wiricir waa once cuwnun uuc is now rare. D. The proposed landmark 1n its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighbcrhood, community or city. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council does hereby approve the Hlstorlc Landmark Designation No. 30, ~~ -( 7/ REAPPORTIONMENT AND REDISTRIBUTION OF ASSESSMENTS A88E88MENT DISTRICT 0d-2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MONTH ENDING MAY 91, 1E88 REAPPORTZONMENT REPORT REAPPORTIONMENT AND REDISTRIBUTION OF ASSESSMENTS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86-2 The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Ras previously confirmed assessments in a special assessment district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1413", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and - bonds were issued to represent the costs for unpaid assessments pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", being Division 10 of said code, said Special Assessment District known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86-2 Subsequent to the confirmation, certain lots and; or parcels of land upon which there era unpaid assessments have bean merged and divided and the undersigned, as Superintendent of Streets, has apportioned the unpaid amount of said installments, all as authorized by Part 10 oP the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", specifically commencing with Section 8730 thereof, of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. The undersigned, as Superintendent of Streets, doss herewith submit the following report, settl ng forth the following: Exhibit A: Listing of segregation and reapportionment of assessments r r- I ENDEN'f CITY OF HO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THIS DAY OF 1988. CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA I DO HEREBX CERTIFY THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DID, FOLLOWING A PUBLiC HEARING, CONFIRM AND MODIFY THE ASSESSMENTS AS SET FORTH HEREIN ON THE DAY OF 1988. CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA FZLED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, THIS DAY OF , 1988. SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE AMENDED ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM WAS FZLED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, THE DAY OP , 1988 CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFCRNIA EXHIBIT "A" REAPPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT Parcel Description Unpaid Assessment IASSessor's Description) Assessment Amount Number Book/Pace/Parcel Amount Remaining an7 °°, .. "•_•• $27,444.97 $26,7b7.23 388 207-271-72 22,828.28 22,281.19 AMENDED ASSESSMENT Parcel Description Unpaid Assessment IASSessor's Deacriptionl Assessment Amount Number Book/Page/Parcel Amount Remaining 387-1 Parcel 9, LLA 87-370139 $14,607.55 $14,257.47 387-2 Parcel 10, LLA 87-370139 35,665.70 30,810.95 Total $50,273.25 ^549,068.42 "Indicates the unpaid assessment remai ning against the property after the 1987/88 tax bill has been paid (does not include delinquenci es if anyl. AMENDED D/AG~PAM ASSE5SMENT O/STR/~T NO. BG-2 cvr Lr gq~NO ctrgnnaMSq LOUNYY OF ,GN 9f.0Vggd~Yp Sigif OF G.IL/FtlPN/q ~4~ v W ~glpl~p tvn WI!la~0 4~M Ca`!V (d'KCND: ~~ m ymwr !um ~uKm ~~ .~r.pe wx~+w rum Mrot l~ I ~/ ._ - m u v~:~w wusrr vu u. ra u iMa~~ V ~ 4 txo tt n .tim rs .: w +..'1°Om°lia~~ u y®w~lti ~uv °o uo u no. a m o lr... c!n n wee arrow Nx PA.ILfL f //i.r ,a9 ~I- s ± A~ . ~ Q iT ~ >~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~c ~ ] ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x ....,r ~- . ~ Q j p~ p ~ 1 ( ~ p ~[ eFt l/fe ~ ~ !~ ~ ~ S ~ B .~r1.r:°c..b "° ! B ~ ' .~. ;r~o~ ~n»f~k. c td ~ i , ff ~~ m ~ ~ ...e n./ .r.n .arn• !!. w ir.ao1O.a+o+. ixi~ "w'= w.~:wun-_+w wui~ e8T4l~fl' yin n Ww~.+e.~a ~K!ML A _~ ui q ~.~ Y! o MYr7 nN118~~~- ~IM1 4 4w~ tiNYM MANNERINO dear BRIGiJGL10 :O N, `I D MAYYE91N0 SAL RRIGUG L!U April 28, [988 ..Ir; - , 1 :; ,,,~ . .. ~'r, Mayor Dennis Stout City Councilmembers 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mayor Stout and Councilmembers: Please be advised that we represent lames Carter regarding the `Jeighborhood Commercial Project (Item 83-01 A). We hereby request a continuance of chic matter, currently set for May 4, 1988 to May l8, 1988. yours, 'O h BRIGUGLIO ca lames CQLb City Clerk Brad Buller 93J7 9ASE!;NE ROAD, SUITE 110 RANCHO CUCAMON GA, CA 917OO~td 11/rci EO~~o xe (7141 9Bd~1100 - ~- CITY OF RANCHO CLiCAMONGA ~ • MEMORANDUM ~~ r- ~~N~l~~~TlA~ DATE: May 4, 1988 70: Mayor and Members of the City Council r tom/ By: Richard Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor SU B,IECT: STATUS REPORT - 6006 KL USMAN AVENUE - VEHICLE STORAGE An inspection of the property was conducted today, May 4, 1988, at 9:30 a.m. to verify the status of the vehicle storage violation. Cindy Norris, Assistant Planner, and Richard Alcorn, Code Enforeeme nt Supervisor, met with the owner, Nelson Start, at h1s residence and conducted a detailed inspection of yard areas. All of the inoperative, wrecked and dismantled vehicles have been removed from the property. One car remains in a paved area of the rear yard and is currently reyiste red and operational. All other vehicles visible on the property are parked in the paved driveway area of the front yard. These vehicles are all operational in appearance and display current registration. Pending verification of registration, it wuuiu appear ~iia~ wrreni wadi iimu are uuw iu wun Lu a Liai ~ampiin u~c with the Development Code. The initial trial date for this matter is tomorrow, May 5th. Discussion ba tween the Planning Division, City Attorney's Office, and District Attorney's Office has prove eded to support a favorable resolution to this case. The District Attorney's Office intends to pursue this matter regardless of the recent improvement at the property. It is their intent to ensure that compliance with City regulations is complete, and that Mr. Start is prevented from reestablishing the same condition again. Also, arrangements have been made to eliminate the need for the City Council and City staff to appear in response to the defendant's subpoenas. Code Enforcement staff has been in contact with neighboring property al.., aA: .~ p:r6 ~..A Alcorn, Code Enforcement'Supervisor,~will~be4in attendance~at tomorrow's court proceedings to represent the City and supply information to the District Attorney and any residents who may be in attendance. RLA:nas cc: City Manager City Planner Deputy City Planner _ C[TY OF RANCHO CUCP.MQNGA MEMORANllUM ~~ x ~ ~.::~ ,,~ ~, DATE: Nay 4, 1988 n ~L~~~~~ ~e~ p TU: City Council //~ i rvP PRDN: Lauren H. Na eeermen~ Citq Naneger SUBJECT: Parking Prob lame at Alta Loma Aig School City Council ie aware that over the pea[ fax yeare~ the cooperation between the City and the high aehaol has improved significantly. Aot only do ee no longer have students leaving canpue during school haurs~ but sore im{rortantly~ ae have eatab liahed a much better xorking relationship with the current high school Princ ipat~ Paul Ward. The City has agreements with the Chaffey Joint Union Aigh School District rhich allows ue the uee of high school athletic fields and the gymnasium far City reeren[ion programs at eo charge. In add ition~ we rent the high school axinming pool during [he aumoier months for a nominal charge which re Elec to actual operating costa. The Ci[y also has the use of the auditorium whenever it does not conflict with school progtama~ and City Council and staff members have been ec lively involved in the current program to renovate and restore the high school cud itor ium for community use. The perking problem rhich is being experienced at the high school ie ceased primer ily by the growth which has occurred in our cormunity~ and .a corresponding need for a third high school in the City. The third high echool~ Rancho Cucamonga High Schoo l~ will begin cone traction in 19g9~ end rill be Completed by fall of 1990. At that time ve expect [he perking problem a[ both E[iwanda and Alta Loma Aigh Schoo le to become lees of a problem to the City. As an interim eo lotion to the parking prob lem~ it ie our recomaendation that ve consider the uee of a smell percentage o£ [he parking sparse far 2 of the 3 Tote et Aed Aill Park to be evai Table for student parking during school hours. This interim eo lu Lion will demonatra to a continued cooperation with the high school and will alleviate some of the parking problem for residents. A coMition imposed by the City should include a prow ieion [het allove use of parking lot• only if [he campus remains a "closed campus." The City Engineer has informed me that [he uee of a portion of the Eed Hill Park perking lot by students rill in no way interfere with City park operations. Uee wee permitted ehor tly after the push was constructed. Ne experienced no dif Eicultiee et that time. . Continued Perking Problem at A.L.H.S. Maq 4~ 1988 Page 2 Ae ins true eed by the City Counc il~ we met will Paul Ward to discus tfie issue. Nr. we rd e;ll be in attendance et the Cit_v Couoc it meeting to respond to any questions [he City Council hee. Overell~ i[ is our view that the high school has made significant strides [o, correct some of the perking def is ienc ice bvez the peat few years. These specific changes ere outlined in the staff report. In addition, since the met ter was brought to hie at tention~ Mr. Ward hee taken e personal interest in resolving the parking problems and he has instruc tad hie staff to monitor the perking situation on a daily bas ie. This moaitoriwg has e beady helped [o alleviate some of the parking prob lame oa campus. Aeco®eadation: It ie recommended that the City Council permit the interim use of portions of Red Hill Perk parking lot by etudente under the following cond itiona: Ci Ey staff will designs to [he spaces which may be need 2. Dierup lions of City sponsored program will oo[ occur 3. At the time Rancho Cucamonga High School ie completed th ie interim perking will be discontinued 4. The interim parking arrangement be monitored regular lq by the School end City staff. Reports will be submit tad to the City Council 30 days after the start of [he school year 5. That the City experiences no park vandalism caused by etudente using the parking lot ieg 1405.03-216 cc: Deper tment Heads May 3, 1988 Dear Residents The City of Rancho Cucamonga and CTB California ere working cooperatively to improve information provided is the GTE telephone directory for all residence end business cuetomera. Currant ly such information ie listed with your eddreee end [e lephone number, along with one of the following city/community mmea- Bancho Cucemmga, A1[a Loma, Cucamwge, or Etiwenda. Moat people [rad it ionel ly eak the directory assistance operator or search the d free Cory for the city in which a resident lives or a bueinee• is located. Such a single city lib ting has not been the case in Hanche Cucamonga and thin has caused a certain amount of confuaios. CTB will be lending you a letter abort ly explaining a ballot process whereby you will be given the choice of retaining your current community deeignstion or changing your listing to reflect the incorporated city ease "8ancho Cucamonga." Changing the city/community mss will not effect your poa tsl service lia Ling since [he U. S, poa tal Service relies on a specific zip code and not the name of e city or comunity. Thin change i• lisi tad only to the GTE directory. me uxcy ox wneno weasmge wre nee co cnenx you xor waxing your enoxee or directory deaignetion. If you have queetione or concerns regarding telephone directory listings, please contact a GTE Cu etamer Hepre eentetive (residence 1- 500-482-6701 or buaiaese 1-800-432-6702). Sincerely, Dennis L. Stout Mayor DLSSbaa THE CRISTIANO COMPANY April 27, 1988 8onorable Mayor and City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road P.O. Box 802 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SUBJECT: Extension of Tentative Tract Map 12332 Public Hearing Item for May a City Council Meeting Dear Honorable Mayor and Council Members: Throughout the course of the last several months we have been diligently pursuing the extension of our Tentative Trect Map 12332. Planning Commission has approved the extension without new conditions, however an appeal was filed. We believe the basis of the appeal was primarily a sarecy concern. anouiu site Council after carelul consideration of all pertinent lacta and public testimony concur with that concern and require an additional emergency access, we hereby offer a voluntary solution to resolve alternate emergency access for Tract 12332. Although we arc aware, that only, under the most extreme of circumstances would the access be required, we are also aware that 1P human lives are in danger we must be prepared to take the necessary precautions to insure their safety. In either case, we sincerely, request your support of our Map extension. In addition, should it be deemed necessary, please accept our voluntary condition to provide emergency access. eACxORUUau On January 27, 1988 the Planning Commission had scheduled a Tentative Tract Map extension Por Map 12332 as a consent calendar item. 440!1 MacArthur BOWevud,SUite ~eo,Nrnpnn aeach,Cilifomia9Mdi0 (~1414]6o1n1 Mal9ng Addrcas Poet O((ce sox g2;e, Nawprm Bcaah, California 92~ SN Mayor and City Council Letter April 27, 1988 Page 2 At the meeting, one resident asked that the item be pulled from the consent calendar. Thereafter, several residents raised emergency access as an issue along with two (2) additional points of street widths and humps. Commission continued the ..A 6A~ i {~,,, Stem for additional siaii Scent ar,.. ... - has.,. .. March 9, 1988. Planning Commission approved the map extension on Chat date without new conditions. On March 10, 1988, the Planning Commission decision was appealed to City Council. Staff then requested vn April 6, 1988 that a public hearing be scheduled for May 4, 1988 by the City Council. CONCERNS Dvring the Planning Commission hearing on March 9, 1988, a major point of discussion was the concern over emergency access. The concern wee raised over a simultaneous set of catastrophic events that, although unlikely, could occur. The events were ae follows: Dve So an earthquake, the Hillside Channel bridge collapses and prevents travel along Haven Avenue, to the south of the bridge. Simultanecuely, chars is a xire chg. uevv i.,Pa i.. l f oothilla an the west side of Naven Avenue that ie travelling easterly and prevents the residents of Haven View Estates trom accessing Haven Avenue in total. The above set of events, if they were to occur, would eliminate all tour existing emergency access routes (See Exhibit "A"). Again, although the odds of this set oP events occurring Se extremely low, we have of tared steps to provide fvr an additional access. We have met with the foothill Fire District, San Bernardino Flood Control District, and the City oP Rancho Cucamonga City engineer and City Planner to develop an additional alternate emergency access. PROPOSAL 2n the event that City Council agrees that an additional alternate emergency access Ss necessary then we propose to provide the earlier oP the following: Mayor and City Ceuncil Letter April 27, 1988 Page 3 1) We propose construction of interim alternate acceae facilities as shown on the attached Exhibit B (as indicated in red) to be completed prior to the occupancy of the first additional dwelling unit far tract 12332. Approvals from buih tY,e Pacthill P_..-s District and the San Bernardino County Plood Control District for interim emergency acceae are approved. 2) At such time as the proposed Tentative Tract, 13851, to the southeast, is approved and conditioned to construct the acceae facility across the hillside channel, our development would assume the financial obligations oP the bridge construction and graded acceae road extension from Tract 12332 to the bridge at the north property line of Tract 13851 ae shown on Exhibit "B" (as indicated in green). Future reimbursement of the cost of the bridge improvements would be anticipatefl from the 26 acre Parcel just northeast from the 151 iota and the Plood Control District property just east of the 151 iota as seen on Exhibit "8" {ae indicated in yellow). REQUEST We sincerely request that you deny or reject the appeal of the Planning Commission's approval to extend Tentative Tract 12332 and thereby grant extension of our Map for a period of one (3) year and, should it be deemed necessary, accept the voluntary condition to provide an additional alternate emergency access. Sincerely, THE TIANO COMPANY Robe 019 ii- /f U U RJS ~ 1 B Encloeurea ~..._ -----------~_-~----~--__-~--------~---- -y-IJ_i- __ ~=- -=-- I i ~ ----- i ----: I V I I ' ' E'er i ~ ~%~ I ~ - ~ ----- Cry---'~ i ~ I _ k~s ~ ~ ~~ I ~ I I ~ 1 .>;. ~,. ti -. 1 .e.,. r ,._~:.: ~ (~Glka ~ _ _ _I !I s i ~•I~~Ir~:.S 1i ~ 1 ~~ iD 1 I __ .~__________t___j I I ~ 1' ~• I ~N -F~ I ~'~ '; i i i 1 r.. e- ..k ,:'°. _ ; - _._ _ :~;:~ ,~ ~: --- - _ - -,~ tea}------ I ,: ~ :~~ ~ I °,ti' h sui~.L. it a~3_ ~i`: iI~~•1r"` ~1~`~"„J; ~ ,. ., . ., „:,,. . j?;_ _ ___ __7 tea,, _ _ .., ___ =_i__ ______ .~ t'i'n iF- a ..:,. ~ I .~ I . ~ Y.Y pi I. [ I - I~ k .. , i~rr? ; h 1 i~ i ~1 ~ ~. I ~~ C , .. pi.'. rL';ri 1,, to ~):~ ,.. +~-- ;m- sw ___ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~s)_ ;__~___ fl ______-_'n _~ EXHIBIT "A" EXISTING EMERGENCY ACCESS ROUTES o. _,