HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989/07/05 - Agenda Packet- ''~ CITY
_ ;
COUNCIL
-~ ,-i
A G E N D A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGULAR MEETINGS
1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:30 p.m.
July 5, 1989
Lions Park Community Cen[e:
9161 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga
~e•
F.S.
City Councilmembers
Dennis L. Stout, errlbr
Pamela 1. Wright, cuunrumrmErr
Deborah N. Brown, mgvor Pronm
Chafles 1. Buquet, Coum~ilmrmGr
William 1. Alexander, cuennlmrmeer
M ~ Y
Jack Iam, cry Mumgr.
James L. Markman, Puy enn.ery
Beverly A. Authelet. clry ctrrE
City Once: 989-1851 lions Perk: 980-3145
City Council Agenda
July 5, 1989
PAGE
All itae sa0~ittad for the City Comcil Aga¢da wet be i¢
writing. Tha Qudliw for suhsdtti¢g these itas is 5:00 p.~.
on the Wsdwsday prior to tW casting. The Citp Clark's
Offics ncaivas all wch !lss.
A. CALL TO ORDER
3. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag.
2. Roll Call: euquet , Alexander _, Stout _,
Brown and Wright
e. AIIMOONCAME1Pf8/pResvfrAxxoes
1. Presentation of Proclamation stating July ae Parka and
Recrention Month.
2. Presentation of Proclamation commanding Bruce Bmerick for
hie service on the Planning Cosmleeion.
C. CONNIIICATIOSIA FROM T~ PVBLIC
This is the tir sad pLCa for !ha gwaral public to addru•
tba Citp Council. AtaG law pnhibits !ha Citp Council frw
eddnsslnq sap Issas not praviouslp inclnda4 oa Lha Agaada.
The City Conncil uy receive taetiw¢p sad ut the utGr for
a subsaqusn4 nsaliag. CoMVIe an to be liaitsd to five
aivutes par ladivldual.
D. CONSEMf CAL@IDAR
The following Coawat Glsndar itps era arpsetsd to bs
routiaa and ¢o¢-coatnvsseial. Thq will Da acted upon by !hs
Couvcil at ma tins without discussion. Any itaa up be
rsaovsd by a Cau¢cilaaaWr or asaber of the avdisaea for
dlscussio¢.
1. Approval of Minutes: May 3, 1989; May 17, 1989; June 7,
I
I 1989.
I
2. Approval of Warrente, Register Noe. 6/21/89 AND 6/28/89 1
and Payroll ending 6/22/89 for the total amount of
$8,478,948.62.
3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule 14
ae oP June 2B, 1989.
City Council Agenda I PAGR
July 5, 1989
4. Alcoholic Beverage Appl icatlon Poi On Sale General Sating 22
Place for Tha Cub, Eethy and Michael Sayee and Jolene
Airby, 8411 Foothill Boulevard.
5. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale Beer 6 Wine 24
Eating Places for the Saaey Steer, Alejandro and Ana
Shimebukuro, 8030 Vineyard Avenue.
6. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale Bees 6 Wine 26
Hating Place for Cherony'e, Naddeh Subhi Quadi, 9170
Haven Avenue /102.
7. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale Beer 6 Wine, Za
Nallk H. and Mohaamad Tabel, 9879-A Foothill Boulevard.
8. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice 30
Inviting aide" for the Sapphire Parkway Renovation and
Retrof Lt (Banyan Stteet to north of Jennei Street)
Improvement Project, to be funded from Beaui if icai ion
Funds, Account No. 21-4647-8723 (PY 88/89).
31
RHSOLIITION NO. 89-298
A ABSOLUTION OP THS CITY COUNCIL OP THH CITY
OF A11NCN0 COCAMONGA, CALIPOPIVIA, APPROVING
PLANE AND SPECIFICATIONS YOR THB "SAPPHIRE
PAARiAY RENOVATION AND RBTROPIT" (BANYAN
STREET 1'O NORTH OF JENNST 9TRBET), IN SAID
CITY AND AVTHORlEINO AND DIRSCTI NG TNB CITY
CLEA1( TO ADVERTISH TO ABCBIVB BIDS
9. Approval to authorize the advert Laing of the "Notice 35
Inviting Bide^ for Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting at
the intersect ions of Haven Avenue and 7th Street and
Archibald Avenue and Lemon Avenue, to be funded from SB
325 T.D.A. Fund, Account Numbers 12-4637-8873 antl 12-
4637-8872, respectively (PY 89/90).
AHSOLUTION NO. 89-299 36
A ABSOLUTION OB THB CITY COVNCIL OP THB CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
~
~ PLANS AND SPECIPICATION3 POR TXB "TRAFFIC
SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THH
INTBRSECTION9 OP NAVEN AVHNUB AND 7TH STREET
AND ARCNIBALD AVSNUB AND LBNON AVBNUB", IN
SAID CITY AND AOTHORILINC AND OIAECTING THE
CITY CLEAR TO ADVERTISE TO RECSIVS BIDS
City Covncil Agenda
~~~4~4~' July 5, 1989
4 PAGE
3
30. Approval to authorl:a the expenditure of redevelopment 41
Lunde on certain public improvements associated with the
development of n Sears Coneolldated Credit Center.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-300 41B
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY
OP RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING A
PROTECT BENEFITING THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT AND HARING CBRTAIH FINDINGS IN REGARD
THER@TO
11. Approval to award and execute Profeeeional Services 42
Agreement (CO 89-103) with BSI Coneultente, Incorporated
to provide Park Coneiiuci ion Adminietrat ion and
Inspection servicee for a ewe not to exceed $96,000.0;; to
De funded from Park Development Account No. 20-4532-8006
($16,000), 8007 ($16,000), 8015 ($32,000), and $611
($32,000) for renovation of Eaet Beryl and Lions Pazk and
conetructlon of Old Town Park (PY 89/90).
12. Approval to execute contract (CO 89-104) tar Hillside 59
Roadr east of Herawea Avenue, awarded to JEG Conet ruction
for the aawunt of $95,100.00 ($86,404.87 plie lOt
contingency) to be funded Prom Pvnd 09, Gas Ta,; 2107
Account No. 09-4637-8813 (FY 89/90 - Awarded 6-7-89).
13. Approval to execute contract (CO 89-1051 for the Feron fiN
Boulevard Improvement Project, fran Ramona Avenue to
Hermosa Avenue, awarded to Laird Construction for the
amount of $76,811.00 ($69,828.60 plus lOt contingency) to
De funded from Caamunlty Development Block Grant Punde,
Account No. 28-4333-8194 (PY 88/89 - Awatded 6-21-89).
14. Approval to execute contract (CO 89-106) for the Sierra fi]
Madre and Placida Court Improvement Project located from
Arrow Mlghway to Via Carrillo Drive awarded to Heritage
Conetru ci ion for the amount of $180,742.00 ($164,311.00
plus l0t contingency) to he funded from Community
Development Block Great Punde, Account No. 28-4333-4811
(PY 88/89 - Awarded 6-07-89).
i 19. Agproval to execute contrast (CO 89-107) fot the Slurry 62
Seal Program 1988/89, Phase Ir various street locations,
awarded to Doug Mart In Contracting compeny Eor the amount
of $134,524.00 ($1~i, 3E..00 plus lOt contingency) to be
funded from G:s Tax 2107 Acccunt No. 09-4637-8816 (FY
88/89) end t:,e emount of $84,253.00 ($76,593.86 plus lOt)
to ba funded from Gae Tax 2107 (Haw Accouni) (FY 89/90) -
Awarded 6-07-89.
rr
r
LJ
PAGE
Clty Council Agenda
~~~~+vi July 5, 3989 4
16. Approval to execute contract (CO 89-108) for the Old Town 72
Perk improvements with Martin J. Jaeka, incorporated for
the amount of $911,187.00 plus 106 contingency, to ba
funded from Park Development Account No. 20-4532-8611 and
Community Block Grant Account No. 28-4333-8181 (PY 89/90
- Awarded 6-21-89).
17. Approval to execute contract (CO 89-309) with 82
TeleQueetione, Incorporated in the amount of $15,000.00
for negotiation, agreement development and purchase of a
telephone switch and voice and data cabling for the Civic
Center and Public Safety Facility, including over eight
and installation of same through cut-over. Funding one-
half fray Fund 01-4295-7049 and one-half from RDA 13-
51700.
18. Approval of a one year extension of existing Traffic 93
Signal Maintenance Contract (W 87-086) with the
adjustment of monthly service coat with Computer Service
Company to De funded from cae Tax, Account No. 09-4637-
6028, Contract Services (PY 89/90).
19. Approval of a one year extension of exleting Street 97
Striping Conirnci (CO 87-07) with the adjustment of three
price schedule categories, wits Orange County Striping
Service, Incorporated to be funded fray Gas Tex, Account
No. 09-4637-6028, Contract Services (PY 89/90).
LU. wpproval of Nap, Improvement Agraenient, Improvemen! lU2
Security, Drainage and Maintenance Agreements, and
Ordering the Mnexetion to Landscape Maintenance District
No. 3 and Street Lighting Neintenance District Noe. 1 and
6 for Parcel Map 11891 located on the south aide Of
Arrow Route, north of the A.T. 6 S.P. railroad tracks and
west of Rochester Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-301 LOA
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF Ti.e I`ITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, APPR~-7ING
PARCBL MAP NUlIBBR 11891, (TENTATIVE PARC6L MAP
~~NT AGREEMENT, ANO
)
IMPROVE!ffiNT
SECURITY
i3
City Council Agenda PAGE
July 5, 1989
RESOLUTION NO. 89-302 105
A RESOLUTION OF TNB CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCANONGA~ CALZPOANIA~ ORDERING TH8
ANIPEYATION OF CBRTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT' NO. 3 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICP NOS. 1 AND 6 POR PARCEL
MAP 11891
21. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for:
Tract 12832. located on ozomeed Dav Creek Boulevard 148
bet NlOhl d A d V'ct S P k La a bmitteA
by The Nilliem Lvon COmoenv
ABSOLUTION NO. 89-303 1~9
A RESOLUTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY"
OP R71NCN0 CVCANONGA~ CALIPORNIA~ APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGASEMBNT B%TBNSION AND
IMPROVBMENT 9ECURITY POR TMCT 12832 (DAY
CAEEH. BOULHVARD)
T t 13318 locnied o the southeast n f Ner 111
!SY@nue end Me aniia Dri a bmitted Dv Ma fl -B
ABSOLUTION NO. 89-304 112
A WtSOLUTZON OP THH CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA~ CALIPORNIA~ APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGRBEMBNT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVetffiNT SECURITY POR TRACT 13318
Parcel Mao 10185. locnted on the south t f 114
N'ahle d A nue d H111 Lken A eubmttted b Will'am
Lvon Canoanv
ABSOLUTION NO. 09-305 115
A RESOLVTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA~ CALIFOANZA~ APPROVING
IF:PROVENENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SeCURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 10185
Tract 12650-d St rm Drain 1 red on the southwest 111
corner of CanlRtel Avenu0 and Deer Cenvon Drive.
submitted by The Deer cr k Can a v
PAGE
City Council Agenda
July 5, 1989
RESOLUTION NO. 89-306 118
A RESOLUTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OF TF1& CITY
OF IUINCHO COCAMONCA, CALIPOANIAr APPROVING
IMPROVEIBU!'T AORBBMENT SSTENSION AND
IMPROVBlBNT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12650-4 STOAX
DRAIN
Tract 13117 1 tad th net 'd f Ha A 120
between Banyan Stteet and Chaffee Colleoe submitted by
Perecon Romae
RBSOLVTION NO. 89-307 121
A ABSOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP TH8 CITY
OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIAr APPROVING
INPROVBMBNT ACASBNENT B%TBNSION ANO
IMPROVBNSNT SBCORITY POR TRACT 13117
22. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 129
Nos. 33279 Storm Drain; end 13279 Detention Basin; 13279
Victoria Park Lane; 13279 Streeter loceied on the south
aide of Highland Avenue, DetWeen Rochester Avenue and
Nllliken Avenue submitted by William Lyon Company.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-308 124
A AE80LUTION OF TFR CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY
VY RANCHO CUCANOROA, C1IL IPORNIAr APPROVING
INPAOVElBN'l AOREEl~NT 8%TSNSION AND
IMPROVBMSNT SBCURITY POR TRACTB 13279 9TOAN
DRAIN; 13279 DETBNTION BASIN) 13279 VICTORIA
PARR LANE; 13279 STRSBTS
23. Apptoval to accept Improvement e, Release of sonde, and
Notice of Camplet ion for:
D~I_ 06-42 located on the th ids of Arrow Hichwav 126
petwean White Oak Avenue end Nevle Place
Faithful Performance Bond (street) S 62,000.00
RESOLUTION NO. 89-309 12]
A ABSOLUTION OF THE CITY d)UNCIL OP THB CITY
OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIAr ACCBPTING THB
PUBLIC IMPROVEMBNT9 FOR OR 86-42 AND
AUTHORIB INO THB PILING OP A NOTICB OF
COMPLBTION FOR '1'NE WORE
,~.
city council Agenda I PAGE
July 5, 1989
DR 87-60 located o the west ld f R d O k st eet 128
between Arrow HiChwav and Jerae Bo 1 rd
Yaithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 69,000.00
RESOLUTION NO. 89-310 129
A R860LOTION OP TFB CITY COUNCIL OP TA6 CITY
OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
PUBLIC I!@ROVBIOLNTS POR DR 87-60 AND
AUTAOAIEING THE PILING OF A NOTI CB OP
COl@LBTION POR THB HORK
Tract 13248 located on the south aide of HS hland A 130
bet n Archlb ld A e d H A
Aeleaee:
Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 150,000.00
Accept:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 15,000.00
RESOLUTION NO. 89-311 131
A A830LUTION OP TH8 CITY COUNCIL OP TNB CITY
OP MNCBO CUCANONOA, CALIFOANIA, ACCEPTING THB
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS POR TRACE 13248 AND
AUTNORIEIN6 TN8 PILING OP A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE FORK
Tract 13060 located on the eouthwe t e f Millik n 132
Avenue and Palrmont wav
Release:
Faithful Performance Bond (Sheet) $ 480,000.00
Accept:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 48,000.00
~ ~ RESOLUTIOR NO. 89-312 133
A ABSOLUTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OF TH6 CITY
OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCBPTINC
THB PUBLIC IMPROVBMBNTB POR TRACT 13060 AND
AUTHORIEINC TH6 lILINC OP A NCfICE OF
COMPLETION POR TNH NOAA
V ,
PAGE
City Council Agenda
July 5, 1989
Tract Noe. 12590. 12590-2: and T t N 12590-3 d 134
12590-4 located on the northeast corner of Base Line Aoad
and Valencia Avenue
Tract 12590:
Release:
Faithful Performance Bond (street) $ 133,000.00
I
Accept:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 13,300.00
Tract 32590-2:
Release:
Faithful Performance BOnd (Street) $ 25,500.00
Accept:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 2,550.00
Tract Nos. 12590-3 6 -4:
Release:
i Faithful Performance Bond (Stteei) $ 18,000.00
Accept:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 1,800.00
RHSOLUTION NO. 89-313 135
A RfiSOLUTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OP IUfNCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACTS 12590; 12590-
2; 12590-3 AND 12590-4 AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OP COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
24. Approval t0 accept Improvements, Release of Maintenance 136
Guarantee Bond for Tract 12490 located at 8167 Vineyard
Avenue south of Foothill Boulevard.
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 2,310,00
i 25. Approval of the Environmental Initial study, pa rte I and ~ 13?
u, for the propOeed xldtlen Parm Aoad Culvert, located
1100 fast east Of Carnelian Street north of Hillside Road
and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor.
( i'
r,~~
PAGE
City Council Agenda
July 5, 1989
RESOLUTION NO. 89-314 138
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY
OP RANCHO COCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THB
ENVIR0N1NiNTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A
CATEGORICAL SX&MPTION POR THE PROPOSHD HZODEN
FARM ROAD CULVERT
26. Approval of Bnvizonmental ABee9emeni and Ieeu ante of a 151
Categorical Exemption for the proposed Sapphire Parkway
Renovation and Trail Retrofit, between Banyan Avenue to
north of Jennet Str¢et.
AESOLVTION NO. 89-315 152
A RESOLUTION OF THE CZTY COUNCIL OP THE CITY
OP IUfNCRO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSIffiNT INITIAL STVDY AND
ISSUANCE OP A CATE(iOR ICAL RYEMPTION FoR THE
PROPO380 SAPPHIRE PARKWAY RENOVATION AND TM IL
RETROFIT
27. Approval of Reaolut ions to deny Variance 89-04 and Minor 165
Development Review 87-71, Caimercial Carriers - A request
to grade and Deus approximately 12 scree of land and a
request to reduce the parking setback from 25 feet to e
feet and the landscape setback from 35 feet to B feet in
the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial District (subarea 9),
located on the BOUth sitle of Jersey Boulevard, between
Utica and Vincent Avanue6 - APN 209-143-07, O8, & 09.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-316 lfi6
A RESOLVTION OP THE CITY COVHCIL OF THE CITY
OF NANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNI A, DENYING
VARIANCE NO. 89-06 TO REDUCB THE PARKING
SETBACK PROM 25 PEST TO 8 FEET AND REDUCE THE
LANDSCAPE SETBACK PROM 35 FEET TO 8 PEST FOR
12 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THB SOUTH SIDE OF
JERSEY BOULEVAPD BETWEEN UTICA AND VINCENT
AVENUES IN THE MINIMUM IMPACT/HEAVY INDUSTRIAL
DISTRICT (3VBAAEA 9), AND HARING PINDINOS IN
~ i ~ ~ SUPPORT THEnxop - APN 209-143-07, 08, & 09 i
r
PAGE
City Council Agenda
July 5, 1989 30
RSSOLOTION NO. 89-317 169
A AESOLUTIOR OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING HINOR
DHVHIAPMENT RBVIEN NO 87-71, LOCATED AT 10807
JERSITY BOULEVARD IN THS MINIMUM IMPACT/HEAVY
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 9) OP THE
INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AND MAKING FINDINGS
IN SUPPORT THBRBOF - APN 209-343-07, OB 6 09
28. Approval to set Public Nearing for July 19, 1989 Ear 172
Refuse Rate Adjustment.
6. CONSENT ORDINANCES
The tollvrLvq Ortlivavcaa hates had public hearivga at the ties
of first readivg. eeaovd nadinga are expected to ba routine
and von-eovtro~eeaisl. Thep rill M aetad upon by the Council
at oue ties xitbout discvaiov. The Citp Clerk rill ned the
title. Anp i!a cav W raaw~ed for dLcuaaiov.
1. CO O
C ST OES C
T CONSTRUCTION
REOVIRBNHNTS
ORDINANCE NO. 58-C (Second Leading) 179
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO COCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, ADDING
SECTION 12.08.055 TO TH8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO AN EXEMPTION FOR
PRIVATE STREETS FROH STREET OEDICAT ION AND
CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS
2. £NVIRON NTAL T D U CIP NDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA - VARIOUS AMENDMENTS TO TITLE
16, THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, REGARDING APPEAL PERIODS,
APPROVAL YERIODSr AND BXTEN9IONS.
i oROINANCB NO. 7.8-C (second reading) 176
i
' i i i
Ali ORDINANCB OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY i
OP RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
TITLE 16 OP THE RANCHO CUCANONGA MVNI CIPAL
CODE REGARDING SUBDIVISIONS
~-~~
PAGE
CZty Council Agenda
,TUly 5, 1989 11
3. ASS S US RI P CIFIC PLAN
ANEROMBNT E9-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment
to the land wee tlaf inition of "Building Maintenance
Services" to include small operation contractors which
meet certain criteria.
179
ORDINANCE NO. 396 (second reading)
AN OHDIN,IiiCE OF T'dE Ciit COUNCZi OF '1'HK C1'1`Y
OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, A.~NDING THE
INDUSTRIAL SPECIPIC PLAN TO INCLUDE EMALL
OPERATION BUILDING CONTRACTORS WHICH FEET
CERTAIN CRITERIA IN TEH: LAND USE DEFINITION OF
"BUILDING FUlSN1RNANCE SERVICES"
!. ADVHATI SED PUBLIC HEARINGS
The follarivg itea ba~a bees adaertiaad and/or posed es
public hearings •v ragvirW Dp laW. The chair will open tae
Beativg to rspiae public tutiwvp.
180
1. CONSIDERATION OP AMENDING TITLE 12 OP THE RANCHO
C C GA C H G EXC U ION OP THE
CON TR 5 DHN AS ON RBSIDSNTIAL STREETS
CoatiaaW frog June 21, 1989 Beating
ORDINANCE NO. 58-D (first reading) 181
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING
SECTION ].2 .OB.C40(A) TO THH RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO AN EXEMPTION FROH
THE CONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALXS ON CERTAIN
RE EIDENTIAL STREETS
O. PVBLIC HEARINGS
The following iteu save no legal publication oz posting
requiraBeats. The Caair Will open tae Beating to receive
public test.iBOap.
~. i0N TO APP "V- ~ SO 1 ONS CL G RESUL S OF
wa
ELECT
A E NG Y AN O BONGS D
L^cVY' O SP C A P AD G OP O INANCE
AUTHORI HVY O S TA%ES FOR CO UN I~
FA~T,TIHS DISTRICT HE-2
~, -` ,I~',~,
,,,
r)~`
PAGE
City Council Agenda
,7uly 5, 1989 12
RESOLUTION NO. 89-318 183
A RESOLUTION OP THB CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY
OP R11NCH0 CUCAMONGA, CALIPORN IAr DECLARING THE
RESQLTS OP A "HELLO-RO05 CONMUNITY FACILITIES
ACT OP 1982" SPECIAL TA% AND BOND
AUTNOAIEATION ELECTION
ORDINANCE NO. >97 (first reading) 185
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OP RANCHO WCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTKORI2ING
THE LEVY OP A SPECIAL TAX IN A COMMVNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT
RESOLUTION NO. 89-319 192
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CAL IFORNIAr AUTHOAI2ING
PRELIMINARY ISSUANCE OF BONDS OP A COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT
RESOLUTION NO. 89-340 195
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING
ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX POA A COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT
H. CITY MANAOER'8 STAR REPORTS
The following ite~e do not legally require any public
teat iegny, although the Chair asp open the ~eelinq for public
i input.
1. PAE58NTAT ION BY SANBAG STAFF R.GAADING PROPOSAL FOR
COUNTY-NIOE BALLOT MEASURE FOR TRANSPORTATION PVRPOS
(oral Report)
2. CONSIDERATION OP ESTABLISHING P RK NATCH PROGRAM - PARKS 202
WATCH is a ~rlme prevention program which enlists the
~
~
~ ~ active participation of cltizene in cooperat Lon with law
~
enforcement to reduce crone within the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. Continued frw Jme 21, 19 E9 ueting.
3. CONSIDEMTION OP NAME CHANGE FOR DON TAP IA PART( TO DON 2~~
TIBUACIO TAPIR PARK
i'~~`
~`F
PAGE
City Council Agenda
July 5, 1989 13
4. ANNEXATION 89-03 - BLACRNON HOMES INC - A request to 2~9
approve the Tex Revenue Exchange for the annexation
proceedings (LAFCO 2547) between the County of San
Bernardino and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for
approximately 25 scree of vacant land located at the
northeamk coiner of Highland and ROCh08ter Avenuee - APN
225-152-O1r O2, 03, 04r and I8.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-321 Zip
A RBSOLVTION OF TIUi CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETEPNINING
THH AHOUNT OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUES TO BS
EXCHANGED BETWEHN AND AMONG THE COUNTY OP SAN
SHIINARDI N0 AND TH6 CLTY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA
RESULTING FRON TNB JURISDICTIONAL CHANGE
DESCAIBHD RY LAFCO NO. 2547
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have bon requotod by tha Citp Council
for diacuwion. Thay are not public hearing iteo, •lkhoug6
the Cbair uy opo tDe meeting for public input.
1. SOLID WASTE/AHCYCLING UPDATE - Council Subcommittee for 215
~~ I
SOlld Naete/Recycling recommends adopting a Resolution
eetebllehing waste reduction goals and endoreinq a
comprehensive solifl waste reduction et rategyr
SuDCOmmitiee ie also recommending eetabllehing a local
environmental quality/resource recovery committee.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-322 217
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING
WASTE REDUCTION GOALS AND BNDORSING A
COMPRENBNSIVE SOLID WASTE REDVCTION STRATEGY
2. DISCUSSION ON INITIATING A DEVELOPMENT CODB AMBNDM NT TO
~I ESTABLISH STANDARDS FOR CAA WASNBS
I i i i
J. IDHNTIFIGTION OF ITR43 yOR NEIT IDSETINO
Tbia is LDa Lima for Citp Council to identify the items Lhey
wish to diacuu et the next Nmsting. ThaN iteu will eat be
discussed at this mesiingr only idmii[[ed foz the next
meeting.
( ~.~
Y'.'''~~ttCCyy ~.
t S
PAGE
City Council Agenda
July 5, 1989 16
R COMMUNICATIONS TROM THE PUBLIC
This is the tine sad place for the general public to address
tha Cilp Council. etata law prohibits the Citp Council froe
addressing nap ieene not pceviouslp iaeluded on the Agenda.
Ths Citp Council sap receive tsstiaonp sad sat the utter for
a subsequent seating. Corents ara to be 1Lited to five
~iautes per individual.
L• ADJOURNI~7T
NBETINO TO ADJOURII TO JULY 11, 1989 AT 7100 P.N. AT TRS LIONS
PARK COIWOAITI CAITHR TOR A JOINT MHHTINO OR THS CITY COUNCIL
AND SCHOOL DISTRICTS.
I, Beverly A. Auihelet, City Clerk of the City of Aancho
Cucenwnga, hereby certify that n true, accurate copy of the
foregoing agenda wee posted on June 30, 1989, eeventy-two (72)
hours prior to the meeting par GOVerniaent Code 56953 et 9320-
i
i
i C Baee Line Road.
i
4:
May 3, 1939
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meeting
A. CALL TD ORDER
A regular meeting of the city Council gf the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on
Wednesday, Nay 3, 19 BB, in the Lions Park Conunu nity Center, 9161 Base Line Road,
Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting wne called to order at 7:45 p.m. by
Mayor Dennis L. Stout.
Pre9ant were Councilmembere: William J. Alexander, DeboraR N. Brown, Charles
J. Buquet II, Pamela J. Wright (arrived 3:07 p.m. ), and Mayor Dennis L. Stout.
A leo present were: Jerk Lam, Ciiy Manager; James Harkman, City Attorney;
Beverly Aut he let, City Clerk; Linda Daniele, Deputy City Manager; Jerry Fu lwood,
Deputy City Manager; Mike Olivier, Senior Civil 8ngi nest; Paul Rougeau, Traffic
Engineer; OCto Rroutil, Deputy CSty Planner; Lflrry Henderson, Senior Planner;
and Duane Baker, Administrative Assistant.
• R R R 1 R
B. ANNOUNCBNENTB/PAESENTATIONB
R R R x R+
C. CONSENT CALENDAR
C1. Approval of Minutes: March 15, 1989.
C2. Approval of Warranter Register No'e 4-19-89 and 4-26-89 and Payroll ending
4-20-89 for the total amount of $1,927,463.34.
C3. Approval to receive antl file curtent Investment Schedule ae of April 24,
1989.
C4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for on Sale Beer 6 Wine Eating Place for
Nnci(V'- NaW Ynr4 .Chyle Di E2ori 3, 9ede P. ., s ••• ^•• , •„++ ,ra..,,...
sou lcvard.
C5. Ai coho, iv' Beverage Application for On Sale Beer & Wine Eating Place foe
Taco Fac toxy, Raquel Guillen, 9799-A Base Line Road.
City Council Minutes
May 3, 1989
Page 2
C6. Approval to authorize the advertising of the ^NOtice Inviting Bide^ for
the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting improvement Project at the Znteraection
of Base Line Road and Ramona Avenue (Account No. 12-4637-8826), Base Line Aoad
and Valencia Avenue (Account No. 12-4637-8827) and Haven Avenue and Victoria
Street (Account No. 12-4637-8832) to be funded by TDA Article a Fund.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-188
A RESOLL'TLON OF TH8 CITY COUI:CTL OF TXE CITY CF RA::CFlO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFOAN IA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THE ^TAAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING" IMPAOVEHENT PROJECT
AT THE INTERSECTIONS OP BASE LINE ROAD AND RAMONA AVENUE, BASE
LINE ROAD AND VALENCIA AVENUE, AND NAVEN AVENUE AND VICTORIA
STREET, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY
CLERE TO ADVERTISE AND RECEIVE BIOS
C7. Approval to authorize the advextieing of ^NOtice Inviting eitls^ for the
Slurry Seal Program 1988-89 Phase I, various Street locations, Improvement
Project, to ce funded from Gae Tax 2107 Acct 09-4637-8816.
RESOLVTION NO. 89-189
A RESOLVTI ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
COCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THE "SLVRRY SEAL PROGRAM 1988-89 PHASE Z, VARIOUS STREETS",
IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO
ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
nPPr wni w auu.wrrzn uin auverc rnrnq or °nouce Inv rr inq aice° ror cne
Improvement of Feron Boulevard, from Ramona Avenue to Hermosa Avenue, to be
funtled from CDBG Funds 28-4333-8194.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-190
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS ANO SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THE "IMPROVEHENT OP PERON BOULEVARD PROH AAHONA AVENUE TO
HERMOSA AVENUE", IN SAID CITY ARD AVTNORI2ING AND DIRECTING
THE CITY CLERE TO MVEATISE TO RECEIVE BIDB
C9. Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement (CO 89-072) with
J.F. Davitlson and Associates, to prepare Landscape Improvement and Renovation
Plane for the ea et aide parkway of Rochester Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to
vase - "~ Lor ra nol W exceed ji7, "e7D.00 to be funded from the
Beautification Fund, Account No. 21-4647-8722.
C10. Approval to execute a Profeee Lonal 5erv ices Agreement (CO 89-073) with Don
Greek and Associates to prepare design plane, epeci Eicatlons and set Lmatee for
the re-opening of Highland Avenue between Haven Avenu0 end San Eenito Avenue
with a connection between Highland Avenue and 19th Street a[ Ban Benito Avenue,
and providing three lanes of tratfic each direction with a temporary median
city council Minutes
May 3, 1989
Page 3
islantl on Haven Avertue between 19th Street and Highland Avenue, for a fee not
to exceed $23,632.00 to be funded from the System Development Fund, Account No.
22-4637-8852.
C 11. Approval to execute a lease renewal (CO 89-07d) with the State of
California, Department of Traneportat ion, for property on the west aide of Beryl
5t rest between 19th and 20th St rest e, Parcel d223-001-05.
C 12. Approval io execute a contract (CO 89-075) for the Base Lire Acad Parkway
Beautification Improvement Project from the Weet City Limits to Carnelian Street
awarded to Gateway Construction, Incorporated, for the amount of $103,124.00
($93,749.00 plus 108 contingency) to be funded from Beautification Fund Account
No. 21-4647-8793.
C13. Approval to execute contract agreement (CO 89-076) with the County of San
Bernardino for participation in the Sheriff Department's Work Release Program.
Contract fldmini titration fee of $100.00 to be paid from Account No. 01-4647-6028.
C14. Approval to execute Summary Vacation of a Landscape Maintenance Access
Easement - a request to vacate a landscape maintenance easement between Wheaton
Court and the Southern Pacific Railroad's right-of-way, located west of Milliken
Avenue and north oP Base Line - APN 202-891-38
RHSOLVTION NO. 89-191
A RESOLUTION OF TH& CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO SUMMARILY VACATE A LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE ACCESS EASEMENT BETWEBN WHEATON COURT AND THE
JVV1nblUV YMV if ll. M1L1{VMU'J µllin'1'-OF-WflI
C 15. Approval to award the Carnelian Stteet, East Side Parkway Beautification
Improvement Project, from Vineyard Avenue to ease Line Road to Gateway
Construction for the amount of $98,661.00, tc be funded with Deaut iEicat ion
Funds Account No. 21-4647-8096.
C16. Approval to awatd the Red Hill Park Drainage Improvement Project to Harris
Construction for the amount of $181,914.30, to be funded with Capital Reserve
Fu nde - Account No. 25-4285-7043.
c ].7. Approval to award the Avenida Vejar Improvement Project, from Grove Avenue
to Sierra Madre Avenue to Vance Corporat lon for the amount of $158,253.65, to
be funded with CDEG funds - Account No. 28-4333-8811.
°+..• Apprcvai 'f Map, a -'ul iJU of iwpr.'ovemeul Ayreeme nt, imyroveme nt Security
and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Haintenance Diet[ict No. 1 end Street
Lighting Maintenance Dietrlct Noe. 1 entl 2 for Tract 12420, located at the
northwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue, submitted by Jenel
Development, Incorporated.
City Council Ninutee
Hay 3, 1989
Page 4
RESOLUTION NO. E9-192
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IHPROVEHENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVENENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OP TRACT NO. 12420
ABSOLUTION NO. 39-193
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH8 CITY OF RA.YCXO
CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNB%ATION OF CERTAIN
TBRRITORY TO LANDSCAPB MAINTENANCB DISTRICT NO. 1 ANO STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N09. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 12420
C19. Approval to execute Improvement Security Aidere for Tract 13273 located
on the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Mountain View Drive, submitted
by Lewis Homes of California.
RESOLUTION NO. 39-194
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CAL IPOANIA, APPROVING IHPROVBMENT SRCURI TY RI DER5
FOR TRACT NO. 13273
C20. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion
for:
a ce 7 t d n the h aide of Lomita Drive between Hellman
Avenue and Amathvef. Avenue
Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 5,600.00
AEEOLUTION NO. 59-195
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
PARCEL MAP 7441 AND AUTHORIEING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OP
COMPLETION FOR THE WORE
V.S. Poet Office located on the northwest corner of Arrow Hichwav and
White oak Avenue
Fa if hful Performance Bond (St reset) $ 34,000.00
RESOLUTION NO. 89-196
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAt[^,.::GA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT3 FOR
THE U.S. POST OFFICE AND AUTNORIEZNG THE FILING OP A NOTICE
OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE
City Council Minutes
May 3, 1989
Page 5
C21. Approval to accept Improvements, release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond for
Tract 12621 located on the south aide of Arrow Highway between Madrone Avenue
and Baker Avenue.
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 5 36,900.00
C22. Approval to accept for maintenance the Victoria Street Rehabilitation,
from Etiwanda Avenue to Eaet Avenue, Contract No. BB-107, as complete, re Lease
bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion'
RESOLUTION NO. 89-197
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TH6 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
THE VICTORIA ETREET REHABILITATION, PROM ETIWANDA AVENUE TO
EAST AVENUE, PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE
OF COMPLETION POR THS WORE
C23. Approval to accept for maintenance the Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting
at the Interest[ ion of Highland Avenue and Archibald Avenue, Contract No. 88-
166, ae complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a
"Notice of Completion".
RESOLUTION NO. 89-198
A RESOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP MNCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIPOANIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TAAPF IC SIGNALS ANO 3AFBTY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF
AACA.I BALD AVRNUE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORN
C24. Approval to accept for maintenance the Improvement of Groves Avenue at 8th
Street and Atchison, Topeka and Santa Pe Railroad crossing, Contract No. 88-121,
as complete, release bonds and authorize the city Engineer to file a "Notice of
completion".
RESOLUTION NO. 89-199
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
COCAMONGA, CALIFOAN IA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
BTN STREET AND GROVE AVENUE AT THE A.T. 6 S. F. RAILROAD
CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE
OF COMPLETION FOR THE MORE
C25. Approval of Resolution of Denial for Tentative Tract 14218 - Nord lc
Development - Appeal of the Planning Commieeion•e declelon approv ing a
reeidenttal euDdivie ion and design review of 8 single family lots on 5.77, acres
of land in the HLlle ids Residential Dietrlct located north of Inapirat ion Orive
and east of Crestview Place -APN 200-441-23-28. Associated with the tract ie
Tree Removal Permit 09-OB requeeting the removal of two (2j Eucnlypiue globulue.
City Council Minuiee
May 3, 1989
Page 6
AHSOLUT ION NO. 89-200
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO
CUCANONGAr CALIFORNIA, DENYING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14218,
A RBSI DHNT IAL SUBDIVISION ANO DESIGN REVIEW OF 8 SINGLE FAMILY
LOTS ON 5.71 ACREE OF LAND IN THE HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT, LOCATED NORTH OP INSPIRATION DRIVE AND EAST OF
CAESTVIEW PLACE - APN 200-641-23-28. ASSOCIATED WITH THE
TRACT IS TREE RHHOVAL PERMIT 89-OB REQUESTING THE REMOVAL OF
TWO (2) EUCALYPTUE GLOBULUS
C26. Approval to accept detnchment of Tract Noe. 13748, 13857 and 13858 located
north of Highland Avenue weet of Milliken Avenue fzao Lardscape Maintenance
District No. 1 and Street Lighting Naintenance Dietsict No. 2 and to annex Tract
Noe. 13748, 13757 end 13758 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 and street
Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 and setting the date of public hearing for
Suns 7, 1989.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-201
A AESOLUT ION OP TFIE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CVCAMONGAr CALIPORN IA, OP PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OP CITY
HNG INHER'S REPORTS POR ANNBIIATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 6 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
5 POR TRACT NGE. 13740, 13857 AND 13758
RESOLUTION NO. 89-202
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THS DHTACHHENT OP TRACT NOS.
13748, 13857 AND 13858 PROM LANDSCAPB MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
1 AND ETAEET LIGHTING MAZNTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND DECLARING
ITS INTENTION TO ORDHR TNH ANNBEATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCH
DISTRICT NO. 6 AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 5, PURSUANT
TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A
TIME AND PLACE POR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO
C27. Approval to auppo rt Tree Preaervai ion in Che I-10 Corridor.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-203
A RESOLUTION OF THE CLTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIPORN IA. SUPPORTING THE GOALS OF THE CZTY OF
FONTANA ANO PRESERVING THE TREES ALONG TP.E I-10 CORRIDOR
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Brown to epprove the Consent
Calendar. Motion carded 4-0-1 (Wright absent).
• R • • R •
D. CONSENT ORDINANCES
City Council Minutes
May 3, 1989
Page 7
No Stems Submitted.
f f R 1 }. }
B. ADVSRTIBED PUBLIC EE71RINO8
E1. ENVIAONMENTA.. INITIAL STUDY PARTS I AND II AND ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION POR THB 19TH STREET IMPAOVBMENTS FROM CARNELIAN STREET TO WEST OP
AMETHYST STREET - Recommend that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution
accepting and approving tha Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II for the
proposed 19th Street Improvements and issuance of a Negative Declaration
therefore and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Deierm lost ion pursuant
to the California Environmental Quality Act. staff report presented by Mike
Olivier, Sen ioi Civil Engineer.
R f f f
(Councilwoman Brown left the Council Chambers at this time.)
f f R f
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the
public hearing was closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-204
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
INITIAL STUDY ANU TSSUANCE OF A NS4A'1'1 V8 UECLANA'1'lUN e'uN 'i'ns
PROPOSED 19TH STREET IMPP.OVEMENTS FROM CARNELIAN STREET TO
WEST OF AMETHYST STREET
MOTION: Moved 6y Alexanderr seconded by Buquet to approve Resolution No. 89-
204. Motion carried 3-0-1-1 (Wright absent, Brown abstain).
f f f R f
E2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSE SSHENT AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT
89-02 - CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONOA - A request to change the propo aed location of
the north lag of Red Hill Country Club Drive, from that shown In the Foothill
specific Plan. The recommended plan ie to realign Red Nill Country Clun Drive
to approximately 400 feet east of the present intersection with Foothill
Doulevard: provide a median opening, and install traif is eignaia. Addit tonal
a lternati~ee that include a rained, curbed median on Foothill Boulevard in order
to ellminata left turns into and out of Red NL11 Country Club Drive will be
considered. Staff report presented by Peul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer.
1r 1r f R
Councilwoman Wright arrived at 8:07 p.m.1
City Council Minutes
May 3r 1989
Page e
• • k 1t
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were:
Mr. Haeon, from the Red Hill area, expressed the only reeponaib le
alternative was Number 4.
G. D. Joseph, resident of Red Hill, felt having Red Mill going Co Gxove
Avenue wessld be the Deet.
Emmanuel Seward, 1388 Lucard Court, Cpland, wanted to know what the three
structures were.
Paul Rougeau, TYaffic Engineer, responded two were the Texaco Et.ation, and one
was a small office.
Fred (last name unknown), Valle Viet a, felt the only responsible option
waE Number 4.
Bert (la.;t name unknown), also agreed Number 4 was the only option, and
agreed with the left turn lanes.
Alen (Last name unknown), 7575 Sierra Rojo, felt Number d was the best
solution.
George Llpeey, also concurred with option Number 4.
Dennis Michael, Chief, Poothill Fire Protection District, stated there
........ .. ....... ...,~...~ ....... ~...... o.. .. ..r ..,. ~....«.. o.. ,,~ ..x ., sue. .. ...
Red Hill Country Club. Ambulance companies Would also need bhe median
break.
Jerry Edwaxde, Claremont, owners of H230 Foothill, felt there should be
left turn signals.
Don Bollinger, representing San Antonio Community Noep it al, expressed this
matter has been given a lot of thought and has had a lot of public input.
Me thanked everyone for all the time and effort put into thin item.
Pat Lewis, concurred that option Number 4 was the desirable one.
Pat Hamberger, supported Number 4.
Foothill Boulevard .^-- ___ _ ~ ~__~~_ __ _~~_ '- -~~~- "'___ _.._ ..___.. ~ _.
There being no further public response, Mayor Stout closed the public hearing.
Councilman Buquet expressed that Sf there was going to be a break, he felt it
should be at a controlled intersection.
City Council Minutes
May 3, 1989
Page 9
RESOLUTION NO. 89-205
A RESOLUTION OP THH CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT ANO
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIPIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89-02, REQUESTING
TO CNANGB TH8 PROPOSED LOGTION OF THE NORTH LEG OF THE AED
HILL COUNTRY CLUH DRIVE ANO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD INTERSECTION,
AS SHOWN IN THE SPECIFIC PLAN, BY THE REALIGNMENT OF RED HILL
COJNTRY CLUB DRI•IE TO APPROXZHATELY 4CC PEE2 EAST OP .....
PRESENT INTERSECTION WITH FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BASEU UPON AN
IN-DEPTH ENGINEERING STUDY
RESOLVTLON NO. 89-206
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CVCAHONGA, CAL IPOPNIA, APPROVING ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT AND
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIPIC PLAN AMENDMENT E9-02, REQUESTING
TO CHANGE THE PROPOSED LOCATION OP THE NORTH LEG OF THE RED
N ILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD INTERSECTION,
AS ENOWN IN THE EPECIPIC PLAN, HY CONSTRUCTING A AA ISED MEDIAN
IN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN GROVE AVENUE AND EAN HEANARDINO
ROAD WITH AED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE REMAINING AT ITS PRESENT
LOCATION
RESOLUTION NO. 89-207
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AP.NCNO
CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT AND
win~~a. uv -. uFneIFIG iLiu: idiF.i:Liici:I o - Iv.WVi.o uno
TO CHANGE THEE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE NORTH LSG OF THE RED
HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD INTERSECTIOK,
AS SHOWN IN THE SPECIPIC PLAN, BY THE REALIGNMENT OP AED HILL
COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE TO APPRO%IMATELY 400 FEET EAST OF THE
PRESENT INTERSECTION WITH PODTH ILL HO[H.EVARO, AND CONSTRUCTING
A RAISED MEDIAN IN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN GROVE AVENUE AND
SAN BERNAFDINO ROAD
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Brown to accent the Plann inq
Commission recommendation of Alternative Number 4, and approve Resolution 89-
205. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
• • ~ ~ • .
.taper ,.e,.~ ca..a.. a recess a,. ,, ..,G p..-.... ...e mss~.ny rsccnveaaC E~ ~. ~~ F•.u.
with all members of Council present.
P. PVHLIC BEARINOB
No Items Submitted.
City Council Minutee
May 3, 1989
Page 30
• R R R R R
O. CITY NANAOER'S STAFF REPORTS
G1. REPORT ON ITSMS BROUGHT UP SY GSNS ULLRICH AT APRIL 19. 1989 CITY COUNCIL
MEETING Staff report presented by Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner.
A. Suggested project description should be written in a way that is
urderatandable tc homeowner.
D. All commercial proj sofa ahov ld be signed.
C. Proposed that notices of public hearing should De addressed not only
to homeowner name, but include "occupant".
D. Felt carwashes ahould be removed from neighborhood shopping centers.
Councilman Buquet et ated the points brought up were good, but felt we shoo Ltl be
posting for all projects. He also felt we ahould include in the notices the
permitted uses for that area.
Hayor Stout opened the meeting for puDl ie input. Addressing Council were:
Gene Vllrich, expressed there should be more notification and more easily
understood deecriptiona.
Fred Deaux, euppOrtetl Mr. Vllrich and requested the removal of car washes
from commercial centers, and euggeeted perhaps there were some other uses
wmcn were aqua uy ou ens rve ro cnn nurruunumy ue ryimwx now.
A man from 6341 Riviera Avenue expressed opposition to the car wash.
,Tim Frost, expressed opposition to the car wash in that particular center.
Jerry Grubel, developer of the Chaffey Plaza, stated they have received
oppoa it ion on every issue. He ea id they were trying to be aena it ive to
the people's needs, and felt there were people who did want a car wa eh.
There being no further public Snput, Mayor Stout closed the public hearing
Mayor Stout et ated that procedurally this needed to be directed [o the Planning
Commiae ion. He also euggeeted all deecriptiona be reviewed by a layperson to
check understandability.
Otto Kcoutil, Deputy Clty Planner, stated if we do the 4'x e' signs and extend
notification, what shall we do reyarding the developer mail Lng and signs.
Mayor Stout expressed the 300 feet was a minimum, but it is not the standard.
It should De rewritten to state all people who ere to be coneide cad a part of
this project, but no lees than 300 feet.
City Council Minutes
N.ay 3, 1989
Page 11
Councilman Buquet expreeeed that everyone who might be impacted by a particular
project should be notified. He also expreeeed that there be a way to stamp the
envelope in some way to notify people that important information was enclosed.
COUrtCilmen Buquet and Alexander both agreed that oar waehee should not be
prohibited from all commercial areas, and both concurred they were not in favor
of 24 hour ones.
Coc:.c iiwort:aa Nriy ht expreeeed s.:e did cot feel xe had a :cuyh :n.oraati o.-. o:. car
waehee.
Mayor Stout felt thle was a typical neighborhood commercial center because of
the size of the center. He felt it could be made compatible. He was Leary to
allow a CUP use going in. Ha Ee It this use was not appropriate in this center.
ACTION: Referred to Planning Cosaaieeion for public hearings
G2. CONPIRMING ULTIMATE BOUNOARI63 OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR AREA
EABT OF OEEA CEEER AND NORTH OP POOTH ILL BOULEVARD. Staff report presented by
Jerty Fulwood, Deputy City Manager.
ACTION: Council concurred for staff to move forward in the formation of the
D iet rict.
.,J. ni:i:ci::+IIJI: u>-v3 'Ii:IEi:T Iv iil:i:Aw - oLn..ivw,. n..ru~.o, ia... - n rdyuva~ w
approve a statement of Intention to Annex a 25 acre portion of the son
Bernardino County unincorporated area located at the northeast corner. of
Rochester Avenue and Highland Avenue - APN 225-152-01, 02r 03, and 04. Staff
report presented by Larry Henderson, Senior Planner.
RESOLUTION N0. 89-208
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
WCAMONGA, CAL_T FORNIA, DECLAAI NG INTENT TO PURSUE A CHANGE OF
OP,GANIZATION AND REQUEST ING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION
COMMISSION TO UNDERTAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNE%ATION OF
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNEA OF
ROCHESTER AVENUE ANO HIGHLAND AVENUE. REFER TO FILE,
ANNE%ATION 89-03
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Brown to approve Resolution No. 89-208.
Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
~ • • • • R
H. COUNCIL HVBINESB
City Council Minutes
May 3, 1989
Page 12
Hl. DISCUSSION BY COUNCIL OF MOVING "COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC" CLOSER
TO THE FRONT OF AGENDA No staff report.
Councilman Buquet expressed Communications From the Public should be put after
the Announcements and again at the end.
ACTION: Council concurred.
f • f • • R
H2. O SE B Y CHVCR BADER'S LETTER REGRADING HALFWAY HOUSES
Staff report presented by Duane Baker, Adminietrat ive Aes iatant.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-209
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CVCAMONGAr CALIPORN IA, SUPPORTING ASSEMBLY BILL 1160 WNICH
REMOVEE HOMBB THAT HOUSE WARDS OF THE COURT FROM THF. BOGY OF
LAW THAT TOTALLY ELIMINATES A CITY'S JURISDICTION OVER THE
SITING OF SVCN HOMES
MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Baguet to approve Resolution No. 89-
209. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
H3. RBPOAT ON COMMUNICATION EPFOR WIT C RA S ZN REGARDS TO IMPROVING
YNUCC~J1nG ur LtriaL JuHtJUr U'a'lUn Mnw au ra acarr nepVr¢ prenen¢eu uy Jaax bem,
City Manage[.
Councilwoman Wright asked iE a coalition or a public procedure would bring
better rasa lte Wi[h CALTAANS.
Jack Lam, City Manager, responded there was already a coalition, such as CLOUT.
He further stated it was a benefit to have the new leadership at C ALT RANS.
Staff felt they were hearing good responses, but it ie await and see situation
at this time.
ACTION: council directed staff to keep Council informed on the prog re se of
this matter.
R f f • f •
H4. CONSIDERATION OF RENAMING THE FOOTHILL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Staff
report presented by Jeck Lam, City Manager.
ACTION: Council consensus was to use the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
D iet rict name for the LAFCO hearing.
f R R R
City Council Minutes
May 3, 1989
Page 13
ID CAT O O! 9 N6Z STINO
I1. Mayor Stout raque eted to disco ea the Aequeet for Proposal Eor Central
Park.
I2. Nayor Stout wanted consideration of establishing a transition task force
with members of the Pire District.
I3. Councilwoman Brown requested a Recycling Subconmittee report.
I4. Councilman Huquet requested a Public Works subcortvnittee report.
J. COMMUNICATIONS PROM THS PVBLIC
J1. Steven Silver, attorney for the Sheriff •e Association, and Richard eeamer,
President of the Sher if f'e Aseociat ion, asked to instruct Councilmemtera to
refrain from harassing type of activity.
J2. Jim Bookout asked Councilwoman Brown for clarification of some
information.
f f • f • R
x. wJOVaxiaxT
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Wright to atlj ourn to a Closed
Session regarding labor negotiations. Notion carried unanimously, 5-V. The
meeting adjourned at 10:15 p. m.
Aeapectfully submitted
Beverly A. Authelet
City Clark
APProvetl:
May 17, 1989
CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Aecular Minutes
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on
Wednesday, May 17, 1989 in the Llone Park Community Centex, 9161 Baae Line Road,
Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:35 by Mayor
Pro Tem Deborah N. Brawn.
Present were Cou nc ilmembere: William J. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet iI, Pamela
J. Wright, and Mayor Pro Tem Deborah N. Brown.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk;
James Markman, City Attorney? Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager; Jerry e.
Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Bred Buller, City Plannert Larry Henderson, Senior
Planner; Miki Brett, Aseoclate Planner? Joe Schultz, Community Services Manager;
and Dave Leonard, Park Projects Coordinator.
Absent wee: Mayor Dennis L. Stout.
B. ANNOVNC6MBN1'8 /PRBSSNTATIONS
B1. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring May as YMCA Month.
B2. Jack Lam, City Manager, requested that items D19 and D20 be removed from
the Consent Calendar; items G2, G3, G4, and G5 be removed to come back at the
June 7, 1989 meeting; Items I3 and I4 be removed; and that tonight's meet inq be
adjourned Lo an Executive Session regarding personnel issues.
B3. Councilman Alexander presented a report fcom the LAFCO Meeting regarding
the Foothill Fire District issue. Ne stated it was approved by LAFCO. Au of
July 1, 1989 we will have the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,
• • • • x
C. COMMUNIGTIOMa PROM TH6 PUBLIC
C1. REQUEST FROM O T ON FO E CHO C C GA - FOr a
motion to be made antl passed by the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga that
Counc ilmember Oeborah Brown he censured for her tallure to carry out the
reepane ibllltlee of the public truer In an appropriate manner.
City Council Minutes
May 17, 1989
Page 2
Mayor Pro Tem Hrown opened the meeting for public input. Addressing Council
were:
Jim Bookout, 5961 Layton Court, Rancho Cucamonga, asked Council to censure
Councilwoman Deborah Brown.
Jack Williams, 9800 ease Line, Chairman of the Res identa Committee of
Ramona Villa, expressed opposition to the censure.
Fred Deaux, 11036 Shaw, expressed opposition to the censure.
David Valletta, 11116 Amarillo, Co-Chairman of Citizens for Community
Onity, oleo expreeeed opposition to the censure.
Phil Balcalzc, 1113 Shaw Street, expressed opposition to the censure.
Irwin Croee, 6836 Shelton Court, expressed opposition to the censure.
Wayne Brown, 6640 Mimosa, expressed opposition to the censure.
Hrs. Seymour, 9800 Haee Line, expreeeed opposition to Lhe censure.
Dnniel Glass, 12840 Coriander, expressed opposition to the censure.
Wayne Lauret, expreeeed opposition to the censure.
Councilmen Alexander and Baguet expreeeed they would not take a position on this
issue.
Dee Murray, stated that since Council would not make a motion to censure
Councilwoman Deborah Brown, she naked that ¢here be a vote of confidence.
Both Coun :ilmen Alexander and Huquet expreeeed they could not do that either.
There being no further public inputr Mayor Pro Tem Brown closed the Communication
from the Public.
• R R • R R
Mayor Pro Tem Brown called a recess at 8:20 p.m. Council reconvened at B:35
p.m, with all members of council (except stout) present.
R • • • f
D• COIIHEMT CALENDAR
(CCUncilwoua Nright rquasiad Itna D6 and D11 be rawved far discus aicn)
D1. Approval of Minutes: April 5, 1989; April 19, 1989; April 27, 1989.
City Council Minutes
May 17, 1989
Page 3
D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Noe. 5/3/89 and 5/30/89 end Payroll ending
4/27/89 for the total amount of $2,514,746.78.
D3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale Beer 6 Wine Eating Place for
E11y'e New York Pizza, RoohOllan Ajodnnifar and Al ieh Sharif i, 9155 Archibald
Avenue, Unit C.
D4. Alcoholic Beverage Appl tcation for On Sale General Eating Place for Mango's
eeachfront Cafa, Tumbleweed Grii1, Incorporated, 8034 Haven Avenue.
D5. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off Sale General, 1988 Conditional
Priority /29 for Haven Wine 6 Liquor Company, Prank E. B¢YYa, 8401 Haven Avenue.
DG. Approval of proposal for shielding eporie field lights at Heritage and Red
Hill Community Parke, to inet all cu atom deigned louvers to minimize glare and
light apillaga as designed by Cu atom Lighting Company, Tustin, California, in
the amount of $52,O61.C^ flue lOt contingency to Pacific Electric Company, sue na
Park, California, to be funded from Park Development Fund t20-4532-8806. ITEM
REMOVED MIR DISCUSSION BY COVNCILwOMAN NRIOHT.
D7. Approval to execute agreement (CO 89-069) between the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and the Chaffey Joint Vnion High School Diet rict for use of Etiwanda
High School property in lieu of limited annual maintenance.
De. Approval to award and execute a Professional Services Agreement (CO 89-
079) between the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga and J.P. Davidson Asaociatea,
Incorporated, for the preparation of Design Plane, Contract Specifications and
Engineer's Eet imatea on the Lemon Avenue Storm Drain Improvements starting from
Amethyst Street east to the Lower Alta Lomn channel between Archibald and Me rmoea
Avenues. The per dLem not to exceed fee of $40,150.00 ($36,500.00 plus 108
contingencies), will ba funded by the Drainage Fund Account No. 23-4637-8863.
D9. Approval to award and execute a Ptofessiortal Services Agreement (CO 89-
080) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and DGA conaultanta, incorporated, for
the preparatLon of Dea ign Plane, Contract Speciticatione and Eng inset's Estimates
for watershed Area XII, 7th Street Storm Drain between Center and Haven Avenues.
The not to exceed fee of $31,636.00 ($28,760.00 plus 300 contingency) will be
funded by Assessment District No. 82-1 R Funds, Account No. 83-4637-6028.
D10. Approval to execute a ProfessLOnnl Service Agreement (c0 89-081) with
Au etin-Faust Asaociat ion, Incorporatedr for Traffic Engineering for the re-
opening of Highland Avenue between Haven Avenue and San Benito Avenue with a
connection between Highland Avenue and 19th Street at San Benito Avenue, and the
craffic scud iea for the reieted cenerai Pien emenament. The xea wui oe a
maximum of $10,540.00 to be funded from System Development Fund, Account No. 22-
d637-8052.
D11. Approval to execute contract (CD 89-OB2) for the Red H111 Park Drainage
Improvement Project awarded to Hartle Construct Lon for the amount of $200,105.73
($181,914.30 plus 100 contingency) to be funded From Capital Reserve Funds
City Council Minutes
May 17, 1989
Page 4
Account No. 25-4285-7043. (Awazded on Hay 3, 1989) ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION
BY COVNCILNOMAN NAIGBT.
D12. Approval to execute Aeimbureement Agreement (CO 89-083) for inetallat ion
of a portion of a Master Planned Storm Drain Facil it iee in connection with
developnent of DA 86-13, located south of 9th Street, approximately 1300 feet
east of Vineyard Avenue, between Arrow Vineyard Associates and the City of Rancho
Cucamonga - DRA-09.
D13. Approval to award and execute agreement (CO 89-084) for Planning Services
with CM Engineering Aeeoc sates, 2ncorporated, for various Planning Services to
be funded by Contract Services Account No. 01-4333-6028.
D14. Approval of Improvemertta, Releaee of Honda and Notice of Completion for
Tracts 12802-2, -5, -6 Storm Dzaln located on the southeast corner of Mt. View
Dti.ve and Seruce Avenue.
Releaee: Paithful Performance Bond (Street) $134,00/ 1
Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 13,400.00
RESOLUTION NO. 89-210
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TILE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TRACT 12802-2, -5, -6 STORM DRAIN, AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
D1S. ApprOVal CO to LCa9@ CBan nep091t 1n tn@ alllOUnt of $SUU.uV to Jne lovrne
Development Corporation for Subdivision Sign for Traci 12991.
D16. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extene ion for:
Tract 10035, located on the west aide of Camino~dera outh of Red Hill
County Club Drive submitted b Rancho A c'
RESOLUTION NO. 89-211
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOA TRACT 30035
et 5 o t e northeast corner of
' i" a ve 1 d au"man a d broad
RESOLUTION NO. 89-212
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECVRITY FOR TRACTS 12642, 12935-4d
LANDSCAPE
City Council Minutes
May 17r 1989
Page 5
Traci 13697 located th uth t f H van Avenue and Carrari
Street. eubmlited by DelY Haoee
RESOLUTION NO. 89-213
A RESOLUTION OP TH8 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEIffiNT 9ECURITY POA TRACT 13697
Tract 13425 located th n th 'd f 19th Stre t b t H A
nd Hichl d A en a bmiti d b G1 f d De el t
RESOLUTION NO. 89-214
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION ANO IMPROVE!ffiNT SRCURITY FOR TRACT 13425
T t 13476 lOC•t d the ortheaet corner of Hellman Avenue and Trvon
Str et bmltted b Ne9t Venture De elotme t
RESOLUTION NO. 89-215
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
CVCAMONGAr CALIPOIWIAr APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY POR TRACT 13476
T a t 13118 locat d th t id f i+aven Avenue between Lemon Avenue
antl DanYan Street, eap111ttBG OY ParaGOn NOmea
RESOLUTION NO. 89-216
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGAr CALiPOAN IAr APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENEION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13118
D17. Approval of Parcel Map 12057. and Ordering the Annexation t0 Landscape
Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 and
6 fat Parcel Nap 12057. located at [he northwest corner of Feron Boulevard and
Helms Avenue, submitted by western States Development.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-217
A nE50LUT'iON OF INE Oi'a'Y COUHOIL OF T'NE CiT'Y vF TiANCHc
CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA. APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER (TENTATIVE
PARCEL Y.AP NO. 12057)
RESOLUTION NO. 89-218
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONOAr CALIFORNIA. ORDBRING THE ANNE%ATION OF CERTAIN
city council Minutes
Hay 17, 1989
Page 6
THRAITOAY TO LANDSCAPE NRINTBNANCB OISTAICT NO. 3 AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTBNANCe DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR TRACT 12057
D18. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, and Improvement Security for
Tracts 13748, 13857 and 13858, located at the southwest corner of Hanyan Street
and Milliken Avenue, submitted by M.J. Brock and Sone.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-219
A RESOLVTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OF TED; CITY OP RANCHO
CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVe118NT AGREP.MENT, AND
IMPROVEMENT SBCURITY OP TRACT NOS. 13748, 13857 AND 13858
Mai s--vaaz-sine-~
.~~
IT®1 RdOVED PROM CORSENT CALENDAR
of-Grki4eenisr ITIDI REMOVED PAOM CONBAFP CALRR)AR ,
isE9
City Council Minu[ee
May 17, 1989
Page 7
D21. Approval of proposal to designate the Hippard Ranch, 13L81 Victoria
Sireei, Rancho Cucamonga, ae a landmark - Thie unique rock and cypress Log home
has been rehabilitated Dy James and Marsha Bankep it was designed and built in
1916 by San Pranciaco Hey area architect, Cazr Jones.
ABSOLVTION NO. 89-224
A ABSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGNATION OF THE HIPPARD
RANCH, LOCATED AT 13181 VICTORIA STASBT, AS A LANDNAAR
D22. Approval of Preliminary Engineer's Report and Setting Public Hearing on
June 21, 1989 to levy the Annual Aeaeeamente and approve the Final Engineer's
Report for the Park and Recreation Improvement nietrict (PD-86).
RESOLUTION NO. 89-225
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PANCNO
CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PABLIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY
ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT POA THE PARR AND RECREATION
IMPROVE!ffiNT DISTRICT (PD-85)
AESOLVTION NO. 39-226
A RESOLUTION OP TNB CITY COUNCIL OP TNS CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARINU ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND
COLLECT A33ESSMENT9 NITHIN THE PARR AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT (PD-85) AND SETTING A TZME AND PLACE FOA PUBLIC
HEARING THEREON
023. Approval of Preliminary Engineer's Reports and Setting Public Hearing on
June 21, 1989 to levy the Annual Aeaeeamente and approve the Final engineer's
Reports for Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-227
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY
SNCINEEA•S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIOHTIRG MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 6
RESOLUTION NO. 89-228
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIPORN IAr DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND
COLLECT AS SESSMBNTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO3. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 6 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1989/90
PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972{ AND
OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE POR HEARING OBJECTI ON9 THERETO
City Council Minutes
May 17, 1989
Page B
D24. Approval of Preliminnry 8ngineer'a Reports and Satt ing Public Hearing on
June 21, 1989 to levy the Mnual AeseeevHlnte and approve the Final Engineer's
Reports for Landscape Maintenance District Noe. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5 and 6.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-229
A RESOLOTION OP THS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CIICAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, OP PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY
ENGIFD•fiR'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAZNTEI:A:: CE CIS:RICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 38, 4, 5 AND 6
RESOLUTION NO. 89-230
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND
COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS.
1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5 AND 6 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 PURSUANT TO
TH8 LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OP 1972 AND OFFERING A TZME
AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO
D25. Approval to set Public Heeling for June 21, 1989 fo[ the formation of
Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 for Tract 13566-1 and -3, located south of
24th Stteet, went of Cherry Avenue.
RESOLVTION NO. 89-231
A ABSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CVCAMONOA, CAL IPORNIA, IH ITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE
FORMATION OP LANDSCAPE NAS NTEHANCE U15'1'R1 L1' NU. / PUM5UAN'1''1'U
THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
RESOLUTION NO. 89-232
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY
ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7
RESOLUTION NO. 89-233
A RESOLUTION OF THE OITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO FORM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 7 AND OFFERING A TIME AND
PLACE FOR HBAAING OBJECTIONS THERETO
MOTION: Moved by Alexnnder, seconded by august to approve the Consent
Calendar lase items D6, D11, 019 and 020. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Stout absent).
~ . . . ~ .
DISCUSSION OP ITEM 76. Approval of proposal for shielding sports field lights
at Heritage and Red Hill Community Parke, io install custom des lgned louvers to
City Council Minutes
May 17, 1989
Page 9
minimize glare and light spillage ae designed by Custom Lighting Company,
Tustin, California, in the amount of $52,061.00 plus 109 contingency to Pacific
Electric Company, Buena Park, Cnl ifornia, to be funded from Pazk Development
Fund f20-4532-8806.
AND DISCUSSION OF ITEM D11. Approval to execute contract (CO 89-082) for the
Red Hill Park Drainage Improvement Project awarded to Harris Conatru ct ion for
the amount of $200,105.73 ($181,914.30 plus 109 coot irgency) to be funded from
Capital Reserve Fonda Account Nu. 25-4255-7043. (Awarded cr. Nay 3, 19E9)
Councilwoman Weight wanted to die case both items together. She did not feel
they were routine. She sealed we have to do this because of project problem a,
but she said she was doing it reluctantly.
MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Baguet to approve Items D6 and O11
reluctantly because of Lhe circumstances we have been put in. Motion carried
4-0-1 (Stout absent).
x ~ a x w e
R• CONSENT ORDINANCES
No Items Submitted.
• • • • • R
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC B671RIN08
F'1. ENVIMUNMEMI'AL AJtl65JMaN'1' ANU UBV6WYMaN'1' Ultl 1'n1U'1'J aMarvunttli on-Ui - ,.111
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A iequeet to amend 1.65 scree of the Development Districts
Hap from Radium Residential (0-14 dwelling unite per acre) to Low-Medium
Residential (4-e dwelling unite per acre), located approximately 600 feet south
of Lemon Avenue, 470 feet north of Highland Avenue on the east side of Archibald
Avenue - APN 201-252 -41. Staff report presented by Larry He nderaon, Senior
Planner.
Mayor Pro Tem Brown opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no
response, the public hearing was closed.
City Clerk read the title of Ordinance No. 394.
ORDINANCE NO. 394
Air vnOLNAHC-a OF 7HE CITY COUHCiL OF - ' --" OP - -
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT NO. 09-01, AMENDING 1.65 ACRES OF THE DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICTS MAP PROM MEDIUM RESIDBNTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE),
LOCATED APPAOX IMATELY 600 PEET SOUTH OF LEMON AVENUE, 470 FEET
NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENllE ON THS EAST SSDS OP ARCHIEALO AVENUE,
AND MAEE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEA80F
City Council Minutes
May 17, 1989
Page 10
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Wright to waive full reading of
Ordinance No. 396 and set second reading for June 7, 1989. Hot ion carried 4-0-
1 (stout absent).
• • • R f f
P2. E 0 RAFT SAN ARD NO COllN Y HAE OOS WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN - A
request by the County for City approval of the plan for the monitoring,
handling, reductior.r treatment, transportation, and disposal of hazardous waste
materials in San Bernardino County in conformance with AB 2948 (Tanner). Staff
report presented by Hiki Brett, Aeaoci ate Planner.
R850LVTION NO. 89-234
A RESOLVTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, APPROVING THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
HAZARDOUS WAST% MANAGEMENT PLAN IN CONPOAMAliCE WITH AB 2948
(TANNER)
MOTION: Moved Dy Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve ReaoLUtion No. 89-
234. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Stout absent).
R
a. PDBLIC BaAnlxas
G1. REPORT ON NOTICE OP INTENTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO ADOPT A
HESOLU'1'lUN UP NNCN56I'I'Z 'UN M nz r
RANCHO CUCAMONOA, ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 0225-131-16 - MARTI PROPERTY In Purchase
of a parcel totaling 15.145 acres to conclude the acquisition of 53.345 acres
for a community park in the northeast port tan of the community. Staff report
presented by Joe Schultz, Community services Manager.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated this does not mean that staff will stop
negotiat ione7 they will move forward. The purpose of the hearing ie to make a
determination whether thin property is necessary for the park.
Mayor Pro Tem Brown opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council
were:
Philip Lanzefane, 1010 E. Union 1208, Pasadena, felt a Resolution should
not 6e adopted by the City until they have more data, and Sf this parcel
was necessary for the project.
James Markman stated we made a good faith offer) however, we were far from
settling on a price. He still recommended Council proceed forward. He did not
feel we had a legal defect.
There being no further public inputr Mayor Pro Tem Brown closed the public
hearing.
City Council Minutee
Hay 17, 1989
Page 11
RESOLUTION NO. 89-235
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF TFVi CITY OF RANCHO
CUL'AMONGA, CALIPOANIA, DECLARING THE PVBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY
TO CONDEMN CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF PANCHO
CUCAMONGA AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to proceed and approve
Resolution No. 89 ~I.. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Stout absent).
• + x
G2. OR- n Tn [`yNSTRVCT PUBLic IMPROVEMENTS AT 10005 10095 10081. 10075 AND
10049 AARON ROtm'E POR TN6 ARROH ROOTS WIDHNI NG PROdHCT BETWEEN ARCHIEALD AVENVE
AND HERHOSA AVENUE - Public Nearing of protests regarding Order to Construct
Public Improvements at 10005, 10095, 10081, 10075 and 10049 Arrow Route in the
CLty of Rancho Cucamonga, in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act
of 1911 (Improvements along Arrow Route frontage of Property). ITEM CONTINUED
TO JUNH 7, 1989 166TIN0.
AESOLUT ION NO. 89-23fi
A RESOLUTION OF THH CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MNCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDBRING THE CONSTRVCTION OF PUBLIC
IHPROVSIffiNTS AT 10005, 10095, 10081, 10075 AND 10049 ARROW
ROUTE, APN 209-041-09, 18, 22, AND 31 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
CALIFORNIA CODES FOR STREETS AND HIGHWAYS SECTIONS 5870
THROUGH 5880 MORE COMMONLY ANOWN AS CHAPTER 27 OF THE
•nrnuvaMana~ our w :~::
• • R • R 1
G3. EM N DO IN A N UI PUB RIGHT-OF-WRY AT 10005 10095
100E 1, 10075 AND 10049 ARROW ROUTE, FOR THE ARROW ROVTB WIDENING PR0.7£CT BETWEEN
ARCHIBALD AVENUB AND HERMOSA AVENUE - Public Hearing of protests regarding
Eminent Domain action to acquire public right-of-way for the Arrow Route
widening project between Archibald Avenue and Hermosa Avenue at the property
located at 10005, 30095, 10081, 10075 and 10069 Arrow Route (APN 209-Od1-18, -
09, -22 and -31) for tAe construction of street improvements across the Arzow
Route frontage of said property. ITd CONTIIANID TO JUNB 7, 1989 MEET IN6.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-237
na-SGLGTiON COUi:CiL r ... w.. Oe^ R:.FCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THH PUBLIC NHHD AND NECHSSITY
TO CONDEMN A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE
CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND MARINO FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOP
City Council Minutes
May 17, 1989
Page 12
G4. ORnxa TO CONSTRUCT PUBLIC INPAOVSNENTS AT 10025 ARROW ROUTE, A VACANT LOT,
POR THE ARROW ROUTE WIDENING PROJECT BBTWBBN ARCNIBALD AVENUE AND HERMOSA AVENUE
- Public Hearing of protests regarding Order to Construct Public Improvements
at 10025 Arrow Route, a vacant lot, in the City of Rancho Cuca.-.onga, in
accordance with Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911 (Improvements along
Arrow Route frontage of property). ITEM CONTINUED TO JVMB 7, 1989 NEETZNG.
RRSOLUTION NO. 89-238
A RESOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAHONGA, CALIPORN IA, ORDERING THE CONSTRVCTION OF PUBLIC
IHPROVBMENTS AT 10025 ARROH ROUTE, A VACANT LOT, APN'S 209-
041-32, -33 AND -36, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA CODES
FOR STREETS AND HIGHWAYS, SECTIONS 5870 THROUGH 5880 MORE
COMMONLY I(NOW AS CHAPTER 27 OF THE IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1911
R R R R R R
G5. EMINENT DOMAIN ACTION TO ACOll IRB PUBLIC AIGNT-OF-WAY AT 10025 ARROW ROUTE
A VACANT LOT FOA THE ARROW ROUTE WIDENING PROJECT HETWE3N AACRIBALD AVENUE AND
HERMO$A AVENVE - Public Hearing of prote ate regarding Eminent Domflin action to
acquire public right-of-way for the Arrow Route Widening Project between
Archibald Avenue and Hermosa Avenue at the property located at 10025 Arrow
Route, a vacant lot, (APN'e 209-C41-32, -33 and -34) for the construction of
arrest !mprovemente across the Arrow Route frontage of said property). ITEM
CONTINVED TO JUM6 7, 1989 N66TIN0.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-239
A AHSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THH PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY
TO CONDEMN A PORTION OP CEATA IN REAL PROPHRTY LOCATED IN THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND MA%ING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THHREOF
H. CITY MANAOER'B BTA}! RBPORTS
H1. CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION POR WAYS TO IMPROVE COMMVNICATION WITH VARIOUS
COMMISSSONS AND OTHER AGENCIES (WZiyhi) Cooliouad from Nereh 15, 1989 meeting.
St aEE report presented by Jack Lam, City Manager.
ACTION: Conseneue fo[ aiaff co proceed forward to set something up,
R R R R R R
H2. GROWTH MANAGEMENT - Init Lal schedule for the 13-point work program related
to the management of growth Ln Rancho Cucamonga. Continumd from Aprll 5, 1989
msating. Staff report presented by aced Buller, Clty Planner.
City Council Minutes
May 17, 1989
Page 13
Councilman Baguet felt this should came back at the next meeting when the Mayor
was present.
Mayor Pro Tem Brown felt that under Item No. 13 we should include CLty
Pacilitiee.
ACTION: Item continued to June 7, 1989 meeting
H3. CON9 ON OF MMUN TY D GN FOR A _ CR PARK LOCATED ON ALTA
CU63TA DRTV6 SOUTH OF 8A5E LINB ROAD IN TH6 RBD HILL AREA - Community redesign
of a three acre Neighborhood Park that was previously approved under the name
Creekeide Park. Staff report presented by Dave Leonard, Park Projects
Coordinator.
Councilman Buquet felt w¢ n¢eded to be sure to keep Lhe name simple and not
something difficult to spell or pronounce. Don Tapia would be short antl sweet.
Councilwaoan Wtighi stated she really preferred Don Tiburc io Tapia.
MOTION: Moved 6y Alexander, seconded by Brown to name the park Don Tapia
park. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Stout absent ).
This item Se to come Deck June 7, 1989 regarding the price of sidewalks, etc.
MOTION: Roved by Alexander, seconded by Wright to approve the design of the
three acre park. Hot ion carried 4-0-1 (Stout absent).
MOTION: Moved by Wrightr seconded by Alexnntler to emend, motion to include
thanking the committee fox their work. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Stout absent).
x R R+ a a
H4. CONSID O O U 3 G S ON PETITION MAKING
APPOINTMENTS AND APPROVING AGREEMENTS IN._PROp_OSEO ASSE_S_SMENT DISTRICT 89-1
(MILLIKEN AT ARROwI
Richard Bierman, Aeeeeement Engineer, Bob Owen, Attorney, and Larry Roiapp of
Feldman, Rolapp and Associates were present to answer questions of council.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-240
A RESOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING APPOINTMENTS AND APPROVING
AGREEMBNT9 IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
RESOLUTION NO. 89-441
A RESOLVTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH& CITY Oh' RANCHO
CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MARI N6 PINDINGS ON PETITION
City Council NinuteR
Hay 17, 1989
Page ld
HOTION~ xoved by Buquet, seconded Dy Alexander to approve Resolution Noe.
89-240 and 89-241. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Stout absent).
R R R • • R
I. COVNCIL BUSIN688
I1. DISCUSSION OP REOU85T POR PROWSAL FDR CENTRAL PARR (Stout)
ITEN CONTIIUED 1b JUNB 7, 1959 NBBTINO.
R R R R R R
I2. DISCUSSION ON ESTAHLI SH ING TRANSITION TASR FORCE FOR FIRE DISTRICT
CONSOLIDATION (Stout) ITQJI CONTINUED TO JVN6 7, 1989 NEETIN6.
R R R R R R
ITEN
Rm10VBD 17tON A6mID11
R R R R R R
~d
ITeN RmavBD rnoN AammA
R R R R R R
IS. CONS IDBMTION OF A_PPOI NTMENT TO TH6 PANCNO CVCAMONGA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Jack Lamr Ciiy Manager, recommended William Purkiee far the Community Foundation
Hoard of Directors.
MOTION: Moved by euquet, seconded by Ale%ander t0 approve the appointment
of William Purkiee. Notion carried 4-D-1 (Stout absent).
R R R R R R
S IDBNTIPICATION OP ITEMB MR NEIT M66TIN6
J1. Counellwoman Wright stated she wanted the Council names eliminated under
Council Nosiness in the future.
R. COHMUNICATIONB FRON TB6 PUBLIC
There were none.
City Council Hinutee
May 17, 1989
Page 15
• • x
Mayor Pro Tem Brown adjcurned the meeting to an executive session to discuss
personnel matters. The meeting adjourned at 9:43 p. m.
Respectfully submitted,
Beverly A. Authelet
City Clerk
Approved:
June 7, 1909
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Minutes
A. CALL TO OADER
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Aancho Cucamonga met on
Wedneedgy, June 7, 1989 in the Lions Park Community Center., 9161 Base Line Road,
Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting waa called to order at 7:35 by Mayor
Oennie L. Stout.
Present were Counc ilmembere: William J. Alexander, Deborah N. Brown, Charles
J. Buquet II, Pamela J. Wright, and Mayor Oenn ie L. Stout.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Beverly A. Aut he let, City Clerk;
James Markman, City Attorney; Rueeell Magulre, City Engineer; Mike Olivier,
Senior Civil Engineer; Joe Stofa, Associate Civil Engineer; Monte Preacher,
Publ is Worker Engineer; Jerry Grant, Building Official; Brad Buller, City Planner;
Joe Schultz, Community Services Manager; and Duane Baker, Atlmin ietretive
Aae ietant.
R R • • R
8. ANNOUNCEIOSNTB/PA66ENTATIONB
B1. Presentation to the San Bernardino County Gang and Drug Taek Force.
B2. Presentation of 10-year pin to Mike Long, Senior Public Works Inspector.
C. COMNUNI CATIDNB PROM TAS PUBLIC
There were none.
R R R R R R
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
ui. approval of "riarranr e, Aeg Teter Foe. 6/iij89, 5j24j 89j 5j3i/83 and Pay ruii
ending 5/11/89, 5/25/89 for the total amount of $2,582,324.49.
D2. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of 5/26/99.
D?. Approval of reaeaignment of fiscal Lmpact report for North Etiwanda area.
D4. Approval of Fourth Qunrter Budgetary Adj uatmente.
City Council Minutes
June 7, 1989
Page 2
D6. Alcoholic Beverage Application £oY On Sale General Eating Place and
Caterer's Permit far Sycamore Inn, Bear Gulch, Incorporated, 8318 Foothill
Boulevard.
D6. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale Beer & Wine Eating Place for
Arrow Daityr Phil Ok Jeong, 10970 Arrow Route, /101.
D7. Approval to authorize the advert ling of the ^NOt ice Tnvitinq Bide^ for
the Vineyard Avenue ImproVP.mente at the Atchison Topeka and Santd Fe Railroad
crossing, north of 8th Street to be funded from Eyetems Development Fund -
Account No. 22-4637-BBi0.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-242
A RESOLUTION OP TNS CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OE RANCHO
CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THE "VINEYARD AVENUE IHPAOVBt~NT AT THE A. T. AND S. F.
RAILROAD CROSSING", IN SAID CITY AND AVTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
TH8 CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
De. Approval to authorize the filing of a Not tee of Exemption related to
environmental revi¢w of land being purchased with State Grant monies to develop
a community pack in the northeast portion of the City.
D9. Approval to develop a Hid Package for a micro processor remote control
system (touch pad) for user group access and City monitoring of the sport field
Sighting at exist ing and future park facllit tee to be funded from Park
Development Pund Account No. 20-4532-0806.
D10. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II for the
proposed Victoria Street Improvement from Baet Avenue to Et iwanda High School
and adoption of a Reeolut ion and issuance of a Categorical Exemption the reoE.
RESOLUTION NO, 89-243
A RESOLUTIbN OF THB CITY CQVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCI{O
CVCAMONGA, CALIPORNI A, APPROVING THE ENVI AONHENTAL INITIAL
STUDY AND ISSVANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION POA THE PROPOSED
VICTORIA STREET IMPROVEMENT FROM BAST AVENUE TO ETIWANDA NIGH
SCHOOL
D11. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, parts I and II for the
. meowed Alta Lama Basin No. 1 Excavation located north of Banyan Street and
we at of Hermosa Avenue and adoption of a Reeoiui ion and issuance ci a
Cateyorical Exemption thereof.
City Council Minutes
June 7, 1989
Page 3
RESOLUTION NO. 89-244
A RESOLUTION OP TFffi CITY COUNCIL OF THS CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALI PORNIA, APPROVING THE SNVIAONMENTAL INITIAL
STVDY AND ISSUANCE OP A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION POA THE PROPOSED
ALTA LOMA BASIN NO. 1 EXCAVATION
D 12. Approval to award the Sierra Madre and Placida Court Street Improvement
Project from Arrow Highway to Via Carrillo Drive for the amount of $164,311.00
to be funded with Community Development Block Grant Funds - Account No. 28-4333-
8811.
D13. Approval to award the Hillside Road Reconstruction Improvement Project
from Hermo ea Avenue to Mayberry Street for the amount of $86,404.87 to be funded
from Fund 15: S.S. 300 (new account number).
D14. Approval to award the Slurry Seal Program 1988/89, Phase 1, various street
locations for the amount of $131,385.01, with Dietricte lA, 1H, 3, 9 and S to
be funded from Gas Tax 2107, Account No. 09-4637-8816 for the amount of
$76,593.86 and Dietricte 2A and 2B to be funded from SB 300 - New Account No.
for the amount of $54,791.15.
D15. Approval to execute contract (CO 89-G89) for the Carnelian Street, Eaet
Side Parkway eeauti.f is ai ion Improvement Project located from Vineyard Avenue to
tlase Line Road awarded to Gat away Construction Cor the amount of $LD8, 527.00
($98,661.00 plus lDe contingency) to be funded from Beautification funds -
Account No. 21-4647-8046 (awarded Hay 3, 1989).
n16. Approval to execute contract (CO 89-090) for the Avenida Vejar Street
Improvement Project located Erom Grove Avenue to Sierra Madre Avenue awartled to
Vance Corporation for the amount of $174,079.00 ($158,253.00 plus 109
contingency) to be funded with Conmunity Development Block Grant Punde - Account
No. 28-4333-8811 (awarded May 3, 1989).
^17. Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement (CO 89-091) with
J.F. Dav ideon Aseociatee for checking of traffic signal and eignin9 and striping
plane. The work will be performed on an ae-needed, time and materials beets
with a maximum permitted charge per plan, depending on the type. Estimated
amount is $4D,DDD.00 funded from the Contract Serv lcee Account No. 01-4638-6028.
D18. Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement (CO 89-092) with
J.F. Davidson Aeeeciatee to perform Landscape Inventories and Master
-enu6ificniion eidlld i-i Vi,i@V dYd AV@D4@ PdikwdyB did cox^@:idn Stl eat PdikWdya
for a fee not to exceed $28,000.00 to be paid from the eeautif teat ton Fund,
Account No. 21-4647-8842. An additional 100 contingency allowance to be
established for use under the approval of the City Engineer.
D19. Approval to execute Subordination Agreement (CO 09-093) with Neal S. Weeks
and Rebecca Weeks for their property located at 5570 Crooked Creek Drive.
City Council Mlnutea
June 7, 1989
Page 4
RESOLUTION NO. 89-245
A RESOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SU80RDINATION AGREEMENT
PROM HEAL S. WBEAS AND AEBBCCA A. WEEAS AND AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR AND CITY CLERR TO SIGN SAME
D20. Approval to execute "Agreement Por Swimming Pool Operations" (CO 89-094)
requited by Cha£fey Joint Union High School District for use of Alta Loma High
School pool for Sumner Swim Program conducted by the City's Community Services
Department.
D21. Approval of Improvement Agreement Bxtene ian for Tract 13742, located on
the south side of Atrow Route, east of Grove Avenue, submitted 6y AC 6 C
Investments.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-246
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION ANN IMPROVEMBNT S&CURITY FOR TRACT 13742
D22. Approval of Improvement Agreement extension for Tract 13444, located on
the south aide of Fairmont Nay between Milliken Avenue and Kenyon Way, submitted
by the William Lyon Company.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-247
A AESOLUTZON OP THE CITY COVNC IL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONOA, CALI FOAM IA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13444
D23. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the
Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting
Maintenance Die trict Noe. 1 and 6 for DA BS-07, located east of Rochester
Avenue, south of 6th Street eubmitted by Swan Poole, Inc.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-248
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO
CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 88-07
RESOLUTION NO. 89-249
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIAr ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPH MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTSNANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND fi FOR OA 88-07
City Council Minutes
.Tune 7, 1989
Page 5
^24. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering
the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 2 for Tract 13359, located on the east aide of
Sapphire Street, south of Hil le ids Road, submitted by H.N. Heim, Inc.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-250
A RESOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVBMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP TRACT NO. 13359
RESOLUTION NO. 89-251
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNE%ATION OP CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE CISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 1 FOR TRACT 13359
D25. Approval of Drainage Acceptance Easement Deed, Grant of Easement and
Maintenance and Improvement and Maintenance Agreement. for Trace 12462, located
on the south aide of Summit Avenue between Etiwanda and Eaet Avenues, submitted
by Radnor/Brougham/CUCamonga Partnership.
RESOLVTION NO. 89-252
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO
WCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING OAAINAGE ACCEPTANCE EASEMENT
DRRD. GRANT OP P.ARRMP:NT AND MATNTP.NANCP. AGAP.RMF.NT ANA
IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMBNT OF TRACT N0. 12462
D26. Approval to accept Improvement e, Release of sonde and Notice of Completion
for:
6891 Amet bust
Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 3,200.00
RESOLUTION NO. 89-253
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
6891 AMETHYST STREET AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE
OF COHFLETION FOF THE NORX
T t 13057 1 at d nth eo th aide of HigJ(land A n bet een Fei t
Avenue and Deer Creek
Accept: Maintenance GuaranCee Bond (Street( $ 46,000.00
Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ d60,000.00
City Council Ninutea
June 7, 1989
Page 6
RESOLUTION NO. 89-254
A RESOLUTION OP TFB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TRACT 13057 AND AUTHORIZING TN8 PILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLSTION FOR THE WORE
D27. Approval of Improvement e, Release of Maintenance Bond for Tract 12650-2
located east of Naven Avenue north of Hillside Aoad.
Maintenance Guarantee eond (Street) $ 26,700.00
D28. Approval to nccept the Tryon Street Sidewalk Improvements, Contract No.
88-365, ae complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a
^NOtice of Completion^.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-255
A RBSOLUTION OF THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PVBL IC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
THE TAYON STREET SIOEWALRS, CONTRACT NO. 88-165, AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OP A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
D29. Approval to accept the Sapphire Trails Aenovationr south of Banyan Street,
Contract i7o. 88-176, as complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engi reez
to file a "NOtSce of Completion".
RESOLVTION N0. 89-256
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CllCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
THE SAPPHIRE TRAILS RENOVATION, SOUTH OF BANYAN STREET,
CONTRACT N0. 88-136, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE
OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORX
D30. Approval to accept the Vie Carrillo Drive, from Avenida Vejar to Sierra
Madre, Contract 88-163, ae complete, release bond and authorize the City
Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion"
RESOLUTION N0. 89-257
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO
..CChMOHCA, CALIFOR.Y/A, ACCEPTIKC THE FUDL IC IMFROVEMEt7TS FOR
VIA CAARILLO DRIVE, PROM AVBNI DA VEJAR TO BIERRA MADRE,
CONTRACT 88-163, ANO AUTHORIZING THE PILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOA THE WORE
031. Approval to release cash depoe ire in the emounte of $2,500.00 and $500.00
to Fannon Dcoiga a.._ ..-.~ , Incorporated for Hcdel Home Sales Office and
Subdivision Sign for Trace^13342.
City Council Minutes
.Tune 7, 1989
Page 7
032. Approval to release cash deposit in the amount of $2,500.00 to Pulte Home
Corporation for Model Home Sales office for Tract 13058.
D33. Approval to authorize the Levy of Assessment Adminieirative Chergea for
the collection of aeeesemente in the Alta Loma Channel District (84-2 ), the
Sixth Street Industrial Park Aefund District (82-1R) and the Rancho Drainage
OlatrlCt (Rb-2 ).
REEOLUTION NO. 89-258
A RESOLUTION OF TH8 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OP AN ASSESSMENT
SVRCHARGE POR TH6 8%PBNSES INCIIRRHD IN THE COLLECTION OF
ASSESS!ffiNTS IN VARIOOS SPECIAL AS SESSHENT DISTRICTS
^34. Approval of resolution setting annual special tnx for Community Pacil it iea
District No. 84-1 (Day Creek Drainage System) in the amount of $350.00 per acre.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-259
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, 65TA8LISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TA% FOR
COHMVNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-1
D35. Approval of staff time to assist ieaqua of California Citie e.
MOTION: Moved by Drown, seconded by Alexander to approve the Consent
ralund ar. Mnf inn rarriad unanimnuwlc. 5-O.
• • • • ~
B. CONSENT )RDINANCEB
E1. ENVIRONMSN AL ASSSSSMENT DEVE S C ENDM N B O- C
OF AANCXO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend 1.65 scree of the Development Oiatricte
Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling unite per acre) to Low-Medium
Residential (4-8 dwelling unite per acre), located approximately 600 Feet south
of Lemon Avenue, 470 feet north of Highland Avenue on the east aide of Archibald
Avenue - APN 201-252-41.
City Clerk Aut heist read the title of Ortlinence No. 394.
OROiBAHCE NO. 394 (aeWnd readL•.al
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT NO. 89-01, AMENDING 1.65 ACRES OF TH6 DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT9 MAP PROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACA6) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE),
City CouneLl Minutes
Suns 7, 1989
Page 8
LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET SOUTH OF I~EHON AVENDE, d70 FEET
NORTH OP HIGHLAND AVENUH ON 777E BAST SIDS OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE,
AND RASE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT TEIEREOP
NOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Wright to waive full reading and
approve Ordinance No. 394. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
• w • ~ + x
P. ADVBRTIBBD PUBLIC BEARINGS
F1. APPROVAL OP AMBNDING MAP TRACT NO 13441 LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF VICTORIA PARE LANE AND RENYOM WAY SUBMITTED BY GRUPE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
Staff report presented by Austell Maguire, City Engineer.
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response the
public hearing was closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-260
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY WUNCIL OP THB CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDING MAP TRACT NO. 13441
F.OTION: Roved by Nright, seconded by Blown to approve Resolution Ne. 89-260.
Notion carried unanimously, 5-0.
r w rr • • ~
F2. APPROVA_ OF THE DETACHMENT OF TRACT 13748 13857 AND 13858 LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OP HIGHLAND AVBNVE WEST OP HILL IREN AVENUE FROM LANDSCAPE
MA II4TENANCE DISTRICT NO 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND
ORDERING THE A_ XATION OF SAID TRACTS TO LANDSCAPE MA-NTENANCE DISTRICT NO. fi
AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 Staff reported presented by Joe
St of a, Associate Civil Engineer.
Mayor Stou[ opened the meeting for puD11c hearing. There belnq no response, the
public hearing was closed.
RESOLUTION N0. 89-261
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE DETACHMENT OF TRACT NOS.
i 3746, 13657 AND 13656 FROM i.iftiD6CAPE MAINTENANCE DISiRLCT ti0.
1 AND STABET LIGHTING MAINTENANCB DISTRICT NO. ~ AND ORDERING
THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH THE ANNE1(ATION OF SAID TRACTS TO
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCB DISTRICT NO. 6 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 AND ACCEPTING THB FINAL ENGINEER'S
IUiPORTS FOA TRACT NOS. 13748, 13357 AND 13858
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded Dy Buquei io approve Reeo lotion No. 89-
261. Motion carried unanimously, 5-O.
City Council Minutes
June 7, 19b9
Page 9
R R R R R R
F3. APPROV F 5 D S CT NO. 88-2 AVTHOAI2ING THE
LEVY OF O F N AL FACILITIEG AND
ESTABL IS NC I N F INTO E LAW
ENFORCElDINT PORTION OF THE DISTRICT
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated there were issues still to be resolved and
requeetetl the meeting be open for public hearing, but continued to the June 21,
1989 meeting.
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There was no response.
REEOLVTION NO. 89-262
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP TH6 CITY OF RANCHO
_............'C Ar CALIFORNIA, DECLARING NECESSITY TO INCUR A BONDED
INDEBTEDNESS, SUBMITTING TO THB QUALIFIED VOTERS OF A
~1MMUNITY PACILIT IES DISTRICT THE PAOPOSIT ION TO INCUR A
BONDED INDEBTEDNESS SECURED SY A SPECIAL TA% LHVY TO PAY POR
CERTAIN CAPITAL FACILITIES IN A COMMUNITY PACILIT IES DISTRICT
ANG GIVING NOTICE THEREON, AND ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES AND
CONDITIONS FOR CONDUCTING AN ELECTION
RESOLVT LON NO. 89-463
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
FORMATION OF A COMMUNITY PACI CITIES DISTRICTC AND AUTHORIZING
SUBMITTAL OP LEVY OF SPECIAL TREES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS
RESOLUTION NO. 89-264
A RESOLVTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ORDERING CERTAIN CHANGES AND
MOOIPICATIONS TO THE RESOLUTION OF INTENTION AND PROCEEDINGS
RELATING TO THE FORMATION OF A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
RESOLUTION N0. 89-265
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COVNC IL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONOA, CALIFORN IAr HARING CERTAIN PRELIMINARY FINDINGS AND
PAStiiNi; UPi:N PRiYPkSTS
NOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded by Aleaende[ to continua the public hearing
to June 21, 1989. Motion curried unenimoue ly, 5-0.
R R R R R R
a. PvBLIC BEARInoe
City Council Minutes
June 7, 1989
Page 10
G1. A NOTICE AND ORDRA OP BUILDING OPFICIAL - DANGEROVS BUILDING -
9768 CENTER - An appeal hearing before the City Council, acting as the Board of
Appeals, requested by the owner of property located north of Foothill Boulevard
on the eaei aide of Center Street, requesting that the Notice and Order of the
Building Official for Abatement of a Dangerous Building, at that location, be
set aside or modified. Staff report presented by Jerry Grant, Building
Official.
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, tF.e
public hearing was closed.
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to continue the item to June
21, 1989. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
R • R R • R
ITBMB G2, 03, O4 AND OS HERE BAHDI.6D TOOETH6R.
G2. DR A CONSTRUCT PlleLIC IlLOROVEMENTS AT 10005 10049 10075 10081 AND
10095 ARROW ROUTS - Public Haering of protests regarding order to Construct
Public Improvements et 10005, 10049, 10075, 10081 and 10095 Arrow Route in the
City of Rnncho Cucamonga, in accardence with Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act
of 1911 (Improvements along Arrow Route frontage of property). staff report
presented by Mike Olivier, Senior Civil 8n91neer.
NESOLOTION NO. 89-236
- FR Cl1l IIT TITN nF THE !'TTV 0011N('TT. OP THH CTTV OF AANOHO
CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC
IMPR0VEM8tiTS AT 10005, 10049, 10075, 10081 AND 10095 AAROW
AOUTE (APN 209-041-09, 18, 22 AND 31) IN ACCORDANCE WZTH THE
CALIFORN IR CODEE FOR STREETS AND HIGHWAYS, SECTIONS 5870
THROUGH 5880, MORE COMMONLY ENOWN AS CHAPTER 27 OF THE
IMPROVEMENT ACT OP 1911
G3. EMINENT DOMAIN ACTION TO ACOUIRB PUBLIC AIGHT-OF-WAY FOA THE ARROW ROUTE
WIDENING PROD C B D U O VENUE - Public Nearing
of protests regardinS Eminent Domain action to acquire public right-oE-way and
Yemnant for the Arrow Route Widening Project between Archtbald Avenue and
Hermosa Avenue at the property located at 10005, 10049, 10075r 10081 entl 10095
Arrow Route (APN 209-041-09, 18, 22 and 31) for the construction of et reef
improvements across the Arrow Route frontage of ea id property. Staff repoct
nreeented by Mike Giiv ierr Senior Civ ii Engineer.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-237
A RE SOLUTZON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THH CITY OP RANCHO
CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSSTY
TO CONDEMN CHRTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN TNH CITY OF RANCHO
CVCAMONGA AND MARINO FINDINGS IN SVPPORT TNHR80P (APN 209-041-
09, 18, 22 AND 31)
City Council Minutes
June '], 1989
Page 11
04. ORnFR TO CONSTRUCT PUBLIC IMPRO`JE[~NTS AT 10025 ARROW ROUTE - Public
Heating of proteete regarding order to Construct Public Improvements at 10025
Arrow Route, vacant lot e, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, in accordance with
Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911 (Improvements along Arrow Route
frontage of ptoperiy). Staff report presented by Mike Olivier, Senior Civil
Engineer.
RESOLUTION NO. E9-238
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO
CVCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION OF PURL IC
IMPROVEt~'NTS AT 10025 ARROW AOVTE, VACANT LOTS, (APN 209-041-
32, 33 AND 34) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA CODES FOR
STAEfiTS AND HIGHWAYS, SECTIONS 5870 THROUGH 5880, MORE
COMMONLY KNOWN AB CHAPTER 27 OP THE IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1911
G5. EMINENT DOMAIN ACTION TO ACOVIRE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE ARROW ROUTE
WIDENING PROJECT BETWEEN AACHIBALD AVENUE AND HERHOSA AVENVE - Public Hearing
of proteete regarding Bmineni Domain action to acquire public right-of-way for
the Arrow Route Widening Project between Archibald Avenue and Hermosa Avenue at
the property located at 10025 Arrow Route, vacant lot e, (APN 209-041-32, 33 and
34) for the construction of street improvements acroee the Arrow Route frontage
of said property. Staff report presented by Mike Olivier, Senior Civil
EDgineeY.
RESOLUTION NO. 09-239
_ run
CUCAHONCA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING~THE PVBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY
TO CONDEHN A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE
CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF (APN 209-041-32, 33 AND 34)
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the
public nearing was closed.
MOTIONe Moved by Alexander, seconded by euquei to approve Resolution Noe.
99-236, 89-237, 89-288 and R9-239. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
Council stated it waa a reluctant unanimous decision.
rounc ilwoman Wright stated that the traffic and safety issues were more
^rtant iC this matrer, 3lthnugh she re!DCr aptly anprreed ir.
R R R • • R
G6. OROER TO CONSTRUCT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ON PROPERTIES FRONTING 19TH STREET
BETWEEN ZIRCON AND AMETHYST AVENUE - Public Hearing for the purpoee of hearing
and pees ing upon objections or proteete, if any, which may be raieed by any
property owners or ether Lntereeted persona regarding the Not lees of
Construction that were posted May 24, 1989 on the ptopezt lee fronting 19th
City Council Minutes
June 7, 1989
Page 12
Street between Zircon and Amethyst Avenue e, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga in
accordance with Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911. Staff report
presented by Hike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer.
Mayor Stout opened the meeting foz public hearing. Addressing Council were:
Truman Reeve e, corner of 19th and Hellman, asked when Council would be
doing this project, and when will he be paid for this.
Russell Maqulre, City 8ngineer, stated we hoped to be under construction nett
summer. Rs io payment for pars of the right-of-way, that would be done with
negotiations with CALTAAN3.
Bill Wykoff, 9144 19th Street, third house east of Beryl, asked why do we
have to have a parkway which moves everything to 18 feet of his front
door.
Hike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer, responded the property is one which we are
not taking.
There being no further public response, Mayor Stout closed the public hearing.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-266
A RESOLUTION OF THS CITY CODNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGAr CAL IPORNIA, ORUERZ NG THE CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PROPSRT IES FRONTING 19TH STREET BETWEEN
ZIRCON ANU ANSTNYET AVSNDE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA
CUUGtl rUN b'1'Naa'1'J NqU n1UHWAYS JGU'1'1Vn >a/V '1'MMVLIVtl ]6tlV MVHG
COMMONLY ANOWN AS CHAPTER 27 OF IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1911
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Brown to approve Resolution No. 89-266.
Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
A. CITY MANAOBA'S STAPP REPORTS
H1. C SI E ON F N U G Y ORDI ANC AMENDIN SUB SECTION 17.08.0600.1
AS IT RELATES TO SCHOOL DISTRICT "WILL SERVE" LETTERS Staff report pee aerated
by James Markman, City Attorney.
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were:
Dean Smothers, Superintendent, Chaffey Joint Union High School District,
stated they were not present to protest this action. He stated they are
fast running out of money, but they will continue to seek funding from the
state, but. they do need council's see Letence to get schools on-line.
Char lee Uhalley, Board Hember, Chaffey Joint Union Htgh School Dietr ict,
stated they Dee ically agreed with Mr. Mnrkmen, and encournged Council to
City Counc i'_ Minutes
,7u ne 7, 1989
Page 13
make a strong policy or philosophical policy statement that as growth
takes place in Rancho Cucamongar they will have adequate school
facil Sties. Ne also caked City Council to utilize the influence of the
BIA to go forward with the formation an assessment district.
Mr. Wolf, BIA Advocacy Lobbyist, wanted to pledge their wi131ngneae to
help with the conlit ion, and will work with staff toward reeoluiion in the
future.
Councilman Buquet wanted to see the coalition make some long-term commitments
to make permanent classroom structures instead of the portables. Me also stated
he would like to sae this tied in with the growth management concerns.
City Clerk Authelet read the title of Ordinance No. 395.
OROINANCH NO. 395 (Urgency)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SVB-SECTION 17.08.0500.1 OF
THE RANCHO CUCAHONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PHRTAINING TO THE
EVALUATION OP SCHOOL FACILITI68 POR PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENTS, AND DECLARING THH URGENCY THEREOF
MOTION: Moved by Buquetr seconded by Alexander to waive full reading and
adopt Ordinance No. 395 ae an urgency measure. Moi ion carried unanimously,
5-0.
Mayor Stout called a recess at 9:10 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:30 p. m.
with all members of Council present.
R R R R R R
H2. GROWTH MANAGEMENT - Initial schedule Eor the 13-point work program related
to the management of growth in Rancho Cucamonga. Continued From May 17, 1989
meeting. Staff report presented by Brad Bu Ller, City Planner.
Council concurred that point Number 12 should be strengthened.
Council concurred that point Number 4 should include all other areas which can
6e master planned.
AC'1'1 UN: StaiE received the direction from Councii.
R 4 R R R R
N3. Fo V c o E Nc -with other agenci¢e and City
Commlee ion. Staff report presented by Duane Baker, Adminletrative Resistant.
ACTION: Council concurred to Select the second Tuesday of the month for
cit}' Council Minutes
3une 7, 1989
Pages 14
meetings with agencies ai 7:00 p.m. in the order presented.
f f • R R
H4. MATTERS PSATAINING TO PUTTING THE FIREWORKS ISSUE ON THE BALLOT Staff
report presented Dy Beverly Authelet, CLty Clerk.
AESOLOTZON NO. 89-2fi7
A RESOLUTIOF OF idE CI^aY COu'fiC IL OF THE CT-. k" OF RARCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALL PORNIAr CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE
HOLDING OP A SPECIAL MONICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY
ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1989 FOR THE SUBMISSION TO TH'c
QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF TKE CITY OF AN ORDINANCE RELATi NG TO THE
BALE OF SAFE AND SANE FIREWORKS AND CONSOLIOAT ING SAID
ELECTION WITH THE CONBOL IDATED ELECTION TO BE HELD ON SAID
DATE
MOTION: Moved by 5iout, seconded by Wright to approve Resolution No. 89-267.
Motion carried 4-1 (Baguet no.)
RHSOLUTION NO. H9-268
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOA THE FILING OF RE DVTTAL
ARGUMENTS FOR CITY HHABURES
MOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded by Buquet to approve Resolution No. 89-268.
Motion carried by the following:
AYES: Wright, Buquet, Brown
NOES: Alexander, Stout
RESOLUTION NO. 89-269
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CERTAIN OF' ITS MEMBERS TO
FILE A WRITTEN ARGUMENT REGARDING A CITY MEA^u URE
MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Ntight that no member of the Council
file an agreement and deny Reeolut ion No. 89-269. Motion carried unanimously,
5-0.
AESOLUT ION NO. 89-270
A HESOLUI'lUN OF THE O1'1'Y I:UUnu1L UF' 'THE CI'I'i OF Ri+N cHJ
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE
AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS
MoTioN: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Wright to approve Resolution No. 89-
270. Motion cerr led unanimously, 5-0.
: • • • • x
City Council Minutes
June 7, 1989
Page 15
Hb. APPBAL OP STAPP BNPOACBIDiNT OP RESO TION 88 557 G DING THE RELEASE OF
MOAE_ THAN 95i OP U.S. NONNS' BUI*OINGS (^R 10827-21 UNTTL ALL IMPROVEMENTS
AEQTA~p~y TiDI CONDITIONS OP A_PROVAL FUeVE BBEN !ffiT Staff report press nted by
Russell Haguire, City 8ngineer and Monte Preacher, Public Works 8ngineer.
Hayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addree9ing Council were:
Sherman Haggerty, felt it was Aelco'e responsibility to put in the
equestrian trail.
Peter Novak, of Relco Industries, had eu6mitted a letter stating their
position.
Cheryl Ann Stanlby, expressed she Rad a handicap problecs in not being able
to get into her home.
Wee Guthrie, spoke against this, and not being allowed to move into his
home.
Scott Murphy, Grigsby Development, suggested that some other means for
ascurLty be obtained.
There being no further public response, Mayor Stoui closed the public hearing.
MOTTON: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Wright to direct et aff to release the
three homes, holdLng the one home end other permits in the City Erom being
processed until the improvements were completed. Motion carried unanimously,
5-0.
Counc ilwaman Wright requested that et aff notify Council when the improvements
have been made.
Ccunc it stated this was an extreme hardship case iF the improvements were over
current prob lame, the withholding of the one house would not have been eneuyh
to cover costa.
R R R R R•
Hb. PICNIC RESBRVATION POLICY - rev law and approval of a City-wide Picnic
Aeeervat ion Policy for Clty Parke. Staff report presented by Joe Schultz,
Commvniiy Services Manager.
H^T.I ON: Mcved wy Wr ryht, seconded by Alexander tc adopt the Ae eervat inn
Policy as recommantled by the Parke end Recreation Commission and come hack with
a report in the tell. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0.
i • • R R R
I. COUNCIL 8U8IN688
City Council Minutes
June 7, 19 A9
Page 16
I1. CU ON UES A SAL FOA CENTRAL PAA Continued from Nay
17, 1489 ~aatisg.
Councilwoman Wright felt we should show ^good faith" in fulfill ing our previous
promisee before proceeding with Central Park.
MOTION: Moved Dy 3tout, seconded by Alexander to go after proposals. Motion
failed 6y tha following vote:
AYES: Stout, Alexander
NOHS: Buquet, Brown, Wright.
ACTION: Council requested staff to bring this back in 60 days and notify the
aporte groups.
x z z x z z
I2. ^ISCUS ON N S H G T SI ON ASA POACE OA AI RE DISTRICT
CONSOLIDATION Continued iru Nap 17, 1898 .eating
ACTION: Council concurred that the employee's group union designate someone.
The Council designation consists of Bill Alexander and Mayor Dennis Stout, and
the Fire District La to recommend two members.
x x M x f f
J. IDRNTI PIGTION OP ITEMB POA NERT MRBTINO
Jl. COU nC 11 IegUe9ie0 a netlVlUliVU ~ yta.,.e..L we u........ .., u.... ....--..C L.
Pacific right-of-way.
J2. Council to entertain preserving some of the vineya rde as historic
landmarks.
J3. A report from the Recycling Subcommittee.
x z z x x z
R. COMMVNI GTIONS TROM TAR PUBLIC
These weee none.
x x x z e a
L. ADJOVRNMENT
Mayor Stout adjourned the meeting to sn Executive Seseicn to discuss labor
negotiations and personnel matters, but to reconvert Lhis evening.
The Executive Session to adjourn to a Budget Workshop on June 8, 1989.
City Council Minutes
June 7, 1909
Page 17
The meeting adjourned at 11:45 p. m.
Reepr_etfully suhmitted,
Beverly A. Authelet
City Clerk
Approved:
n o oo
°
°
°
~
or
o
o maoo
poo~~
m
o Pi-o~~-
.o .o
ti u..o ~o.=
° r w _
: ~ m a n mP
ji Y
tiN~u~ r Yi PO
m ^^I m '/r.ph<P O~+NmYi1. .(i r-m
m
P D
muP PPP PPPPPP0000[i000GO~~+r.
--,
¢ OOOO
~ OpO00V
m
Y O00pO0U0?r
T i Ommmm m~~ m mmm m mimm~ mmm mnimmmmmmmt~mmmmmmmmmm
mim I-i. ; f fr
aX<
m ~n r. O r. VYr
n J=
J 2 Gm D\
O 7 AO ~ i R.70
vi
..~ ..f w
w
w _
w u.a .wi
,
2~ = ~ r
i NVN
Y0 OUTr
VO
< O
V m 2~+%
U r 24 ~K.
¢
O V 60 yZwl-u
L
~
u~ ul u .~ ~1 Z O • JV j621-Q
NON
70
> = j
O ^ U v
N P.NV.
sw
Jav
.o
~
U GJ u V
=
~COa
rrZ
V
_ U
.] U
¢ LLOO
u~3u¢
u~v~
K~
LL
~
O
~:
'~ v O >. 2 i
Ui
. a
rJ
'~L%
ire}J>rV <.. ~¢.
z
L
V
G U
V ~. 6 w
I Y1
V
h
4K
w
U ~ L ¢ a
'~~ .,~p
O
w p.
O0 ~
V
u
I [
i
O {
V O J a wu /.
~. ~.
w
r lwY V~+rm~u ~VZ¢~-w
% ¢ 6 <
W UrKU Vint uN Oyu iu
w}WZ <~VV S~aca
~-
T ¢~ < c2w f¢1
a { w `. r
Kr• uZ~ r>
MjY [..Ol< <2yU72umm
2
J
uO
tJ m o r ¢ 6
'
>OOOjVVtiH>
TS
m OUi U IJ VUVr6UHV¢orrr~~SLL}
i z°~ z ~i: « iii<
m <
m~w
o m m .. m <.
a<m
n
~O O .U YN PPmmN h.-O~pPmWmm~
O
V Y O O p FO U. m u. '-V rNmeN~NlYO
ln.pPNNN
~ r ~+ ~- r N r / r w ~+ ....
c
V
S
P
rYd~" .ndJDO crnl- ~iOd nOOUh r. '~00
.ZOOroO rvO~w"D ti.- -OOOOh'mr coi G.~Ou
r~ Y J t
r i-. 3 , r. ~. . . - .-. .~ ^.-.
VZ Z Srr 2 SZSZ_
Z 7 ~ .~.. lu~ l_ nC-~
J
Vv~ rG OT
6 VZ p6u
wpm _ Z1 ¢..~ .+2
.air v.20o _
a~2P
uS2 ~ _ wp>/
ri. ~ir~ L
> V Y p yr 3? c~ p V R _ .a
a;C
W >~._ .,cam a°rc>w
.. ~ ~ -
ri
iu _
uVa
_ rz~ -
> ~ :- i _ _ _ -- _
-V ~4uW t2
ZSw 7
¢Vp2ttf 3P ZUOVmr~nV7 U
ri3woD=w.aTZm <VU~~- <r. ~- SU
00<L~~~~~ EU P'nV V'JC6 Z,tu
S< <QO.~ 1[OIr V-~wii
U~.1V6 u
<>J LLKO 7J7
oSY~W wZ6rr J'+<uppa
D%TVVrWV.~<LK ri<ZZ rVi ~-'>1VV rr.~Wr
¢o Nmmv~bm L'im UVVN~u VUUVVU~V DUVU ~>~,V~~<V~~t<i ]~v~[)t~
h .ter .+OQPW mdOC~d r%r .nP Udu
P .v ~i~ rvy~OTPVeIOryryd< mh.rviw.. ~• ~ •PN ~`VO
J +'v rOP y.JwnY`a'mOpOVyr FOn.aaPy
OOnOCO ~yr0 FOOOy.p rnPP
.a O u
y a0.. ^O
nu r~ti mNOr I- W N -+
PO-+ a)PO~ ~-.JPO
aJ O
Y
Zu
~. ... rurrn r+ ~r ~n
~ OS
P __
< x S 2^
~x~ :n
.pis - woG
u)..a YJ~~ JZ J..I iJJn .J ~'.
O » Y
i O V x C V Y
1n
i w10 nO.ir < aUw
ii0 O~~ _
:~i n -
9JY uJ LLLL'MOL
TOu ~U u06
rti' u
yJ <J~O
~SV7
JJu
u~~iu ~;¢ u~72Lt
>.]rt~n T.'~.~w.~S 1S2m.n,<.iL1 .. ..i p.n ~J~1LLiw >[tiaJ6J^
l Jr
l - J u
i n .. (.
J f. O J ~+
i2~
t r a ~ <uL2 LVJ[~67G[ JO
<~ui~.i.r -+wi uLLLl2
i r62
VHnPJ3z ni ac]i<
n<L ~4 wJ~a. ~i~ r2<
~ L'u ~ V'.w-- ~ C S <
+i) u<~Li wKV JAL -aZ~ ~X~iu~
Jy ~ 1 ~
i .nV I~u+uLL^ia.uO w1~• v^i .<iI ..a Y„7[]ii<O
~+~V.a.J Uw ~wnT .u+a. .i 1VVS>U VUI: STLYia C.Z+-Li .LV SYKY~Y¢V
Jd
P IV n 0 n W
~ IJON^ WO'A ^Orv -.
u i o-n.~ 00^ UV~r.m ~J nn P n o0 ^a X10
oo~~a ron o.~.~ooo+mOo
OO.pw hOnPr O~vP OrvOrOOPPO ~'~~OOry~O
c OU• LUn m00
~.Piw n .~ YrvOrrJU~ r.~.rw+rvU^..N
mm N ^ -~mOrv rv ^rv in
rWPO^ aPU-~Nmt PU ^"~m<ii JPpynm~eN al
POV fJ fJO ^
;i mmmmmmm m-~mi~mnri r.~mmmmm min m~~mmnmmmnmmmmmmmmmm
F n }iT
~ ~_~ y Jww
I n.= w w '~ O2
O JO
O ., rt .] ~V `~
~.~u ~ N6~ SJw fJ
wO V~lS7V~ _ m wirm3or~.r
~ c] 20
i wAZ rLLJ16'~7
Sn u'in 3¢ H + JLr-Z
.IUPMJO .u2
_ UYOU O .uUO
n w>i~•• L
J l>G < i
f{~
.yY 4>L
:Lf SSv
~ l:u .t ~~~(u ),~aV ~SJ./.'i^S~-'J U.J ~nL a~J LL Un m~YmJms. u >
JJ E
U 1 <
u% J /
_ t
utu
i Jn~J+ u
S ' J7> NjT`1 i=u
- t ¢SU ~j<=L
uja q
.i ~ ;I~ S ~ < J_h<2~< in„ZO LV N u'J UrI
j<w uF6w - <JZ1 '[0'w JJ N p n>
4rJC .ui u~~=~Si _ v~U¢
~ u>l ui tJY^3~+] <i~n~V~rUL~ «U
eY Z-. ~ia:ti.<.ix=~ coi `s..2?~ii= zaa
~~-. .,~.,~w~ = x• z = ~-, -+Li`z Diu ,. u,.udr
ummm~-tiu M1rv.~:
.. .. .. ., ~Nrv... .. .. rv .. .. ..
owY.omnmP000nomoYOmno ... oom,omnmo
oao..omoParv °oo
w~ OPm-~ry rvnPpOOryOYy~w0.1 ~4COrv0gmwOpPPmmnYOO.vYpm
m000 YOmPO ry.pO-~ YOm
-~Y PrvPPm^ryOn-rm PY -rm Y .+Y
m rv.v .v .~ n .fin mrv nn n.~n
6 2 i m
PO..rv m~l'wNnmPO^ pp nmPO~.rv mY U. .OF
~Jd .O 'G .4 .Onnnnn nl-n
ry NhNryN.v NiVrvNNnNhnnryneV rvNN
V Z~ mmmmmmmYimmmmmm(~lmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mt'Im mmm mm.n
V ~n 2 in
L L LiLLSiSOiLLi
Y r. r •nLL 4'KK6KwK¢KK Qu.2 r
w2 __ _ __ ____ __ _ ___
42 Z O S ~
o cwPmnC no opooooo"oa`o no na~~
w W~ ~w ~~wWwwwowwwW Www W
P~n.i: woo i s
# 0000 ~'P
O OOO n~+r.+ Y
,Y, u
_ ~ .". r rc
" oHSU zaz 'o~ ~ w
oro m`zu~.. roP
~izzz i~o w..< ommoowaa
V i OUmO ri'~V w' ~ 2wr 20.w+6 Y
mSPmUw { rvOnmy~r~UO ~1w1-
602>nOYa
~ tiVS t S
iu'wm ma ~.rv.~~
w2ww ~nVV wV.+
.L+SU IOm.J+K= r3iV
~Lwr - mJi+l-u~
-yz
6YO uK.C<S.. Om w.Y J6'ZJ.Y ZSwm06
7yww{Z yp6~Or. V<Or]w w^U
rp ~~a is mo.aox a5mi~5~ rd~, a.Ym ~..'^noooLL i~~w<iri W rL..~,~.-
w~ ~ i
' ~:~ LG<z` u~
i u i~ ooW
u
www OY ttL
3r 4~
d'>Z < 6~L
K ~LLTL2
STT
- > - ~~ooooo -- ---
m .`-ii wrw z wig
V<OVZY~ r2W.n .L-.S<
S L VZ<2 O<L.~ OZti v~< JS6m
.-zm nzo u..z
.rc.uwi u~~ii .`.. u,,. ,oz dwn
.~ azW .-<1
ioui< nw°i~a.o.. ~za zzz YooNw .ia"
~W ZR¢KCCwmV 3 <VYIO
rZ000 UWN2r w2T2~u T
OZY ~n Oi SZSSSYwwwv~O~n~r HGY
_+ Ki6Y1-n^r r02U
uLZ >OWL2«O<OOOJO«{6<~~nrOf60i wZu
<y< ~ONJ LS20V0006nY< L « w2<.
a.a ~cP¢u.t5.-~ama'r ~t ~~nY ~n in .r.r mvi .n wv~.n .n ,nr rr»SVSSOO
awn rOd mL.r .+
~ YP n.p .p0 PO.v ..P~PPn ~.Orv~l .+n .r ryP.V nP
'.~ `.DL ~O Or)m ...Orv OrYO ry^mmmmmmmmmOmmmiPnYYr
~ .~ .~ ry/Vn^ rv N.rrv w.n ~1~ N ^
Po_
a~mo~,
a =; Pom
~
r
_
n
i~ m
u
~~ mP On mm
NnnNn
SI mmmmm
Oi
1
P
T
L 6
V
<I
yuW F
n
Z 0
w 7N
Y rv Y C]
6 u. .Y .i;i S
2 ~
Op{ ~n
3«Jr~
s []lrJi
t3VN0
nX ~L
02¢
SVXFN
cp~ry~
T
t
6 3
U
<i
2r
u~
t
oonco+•- onroom-.NP~• o~•or-o
C VOOVOr~NJ pO.+p•O OOw P•n OOOOGm00
I- ~ pry •OU n vnNNC~u~^PP mOin ~: OP00
p 000•u0 .` a OrOm
~ -•~O OYV .. rv •f O.rO
~ r ,p n O m .~ .~ N
~+s~•'onm~°r~i~-'va o..N N..s m o-'rvm n„PO-Nmr
w0
m •- -, v iv .~- W
msm s - v:a
o' i~~.T- F zoFr
o u >; ~~., ..o0 0 oM
d
a ,.~ ~ ,~ o r .. o _ .,
w 'j °~i
aF r o
r _____ .' ...c .a o.., o~i
V u V ~Ca G4¢
r. ~ i l •.~.: ..,.i .r6 •Y i-LiV (SVi~].i 2.~uV YiY ~•~L ~, •)
t
J .. •r V w
i l n V ^ -R
Qr
VJ ~.~ ~•n •'ry _ _
1 .~ ^Jr1 S'/
~rU - r
y = a'J ~
~~ W
< ~ - uQj J.7 ¢~u7u, ]'1 '[ .~i'w xfY .u 76s
V Nt~~ 1Ur-'urC Q>~OY
u n~_m ~uU wr- •.~ Jr 2< Wn a Yf O"
J f u V TaVWU~tI 6~~3w~Ut~wl l.J S¢r i.l Z
G t ._ :]YUOSOIVWTU uLj~Ou
i ~_ w~ti<Q_ ~Y .~JrY`~On r,.~t.lUti U<¢V<
1 n ~n i, rrV~nN ~'] <l<~<lt<.J<tON.O min warp "I-,
al m huby tr '~JT~Pdti~rVfN~nu•Oam N•`I
rV .4 -r .rn N~ ~ti tires 'Vry w rvN-ti NN
~iu=°,~OO°o for ~ou~a m.'~co°o°~ P«or:o o,`..o .po°onPjo~N OOp
vrr
i . . ,.~ m ,-. ~.. ~.. r m ,., ,., ., ,., m ,-~ ,., ~.. m ~., ~.. ~-„~ ..... ,.. m ~~ ,.~ m m ,.. ~., m m ,~ m n m m m m
a ,L i
.., x-.L zx,~z s =.r
.o~ ~`0~9 -uv_~u pmo
an
.~ ~. ~., r. ~ P
Y nJ ~ i ~I[
c ut > I r
> ~ Y _
~ Rw pa
I LL'JM
i 'Jw
uo v<o .". a' am
W Jm ='~
_ „-~ n _
'i~ _
- ~?,~ _ _ __ i~~i_ __
saw T4^~J
"~ ~-+J-JKm~X pi ~TZ'~1{.cp ]-~.u t.ri {i ] ~U.. .-O WJ,[lY=/. .., ,~
I ~ ~ ~ a 7
~_ < W n
nL uS:
I<J~
5 _ t.t ur +LV L~~~ur-~C 7Q
aV Jp,^ <JJ~ ~Jaa<r JZ Za ~t~
i~=N J ].O ~n Q(]UY ~
6 r ulV _]j
uT21 r<~ ^V ZK a,)nu~n2 *~}:.u
iii ,~i..,~zaaa~ `., ~~~: ~~rt
I ,VJ ny~n JS is ?V IjhvW6==~ u~ju.~
~.in,„i K~ui, i. .a ~'~V~~V )O ~J UtJiV ).)~~-~i luO ~-~F r~ww t<
rv VOOpu NJ„ I.. np.~
.~a~~a _ ~ urn..
a ° o . r
...Nrv-.rv ~ °Nrv n -. ,V .. -. ~. rv , ..nv
~ ~n
J~J~ _
ao~ o~o~,Ja~o~~::o~~~ ~oo~-
- +o~.o oom:.~o .co~~ ~n~ a
cu°
i . ~ .. .. ~ .. P ., .,
Po-~~ .nK ~nPO-~ nPo
PPPPUm
,ii m~~~.nmm mmn ~mm mm~nmmm,-,rn nmm mn~m n,.,m nmm mtnmm~..n +, +~
r _
_ iu
c _ z
u r Y r ..i .r.r .., ,., r r, ..
t > Y~
J _ u
Zwm2V rp
w ~
r~ o no> >>
o i.
1 - ~a _
VO r' Jdrw
6 etV
V » ~
wJLLLJwrv~~O.s~,UIC
oJ>
n Z ,- 4
SpV .nY <~O6.J~~JU~u [U' -.tV ¢.. e~li i[]n t4~i +4..G¢.[.~
~ V ~ V
NL
-. a ~~I i
_]
i6 ~L
[ i-LS<~< ~7n
.SY
Z<U n.~.e w6r-S f<uW
.> .uh ~~IwV 1'~ S~-~4 06l
~z< a~i Nz>,~ :cam .,xw
wJw~nw t6.n ~l> 2~-w<.1
~ wKp K~ 7~C<~
.~. u~>e~i`z i'a'c ..Ieu~>1>z: t.`.a ~i a:~`r-",e o'ou ~,~ Ro
<x ~n <~~...ax~.~<un~ zzzz
..u uPaov ~-W~-..a a..o+~. ro...., nar.r~
m a„r-n ru-w ~+ ~~a.°n+
aoooor-o
~o `m ooa or.POn~+o~°o 'o: ~°oro-s m'oo~Y~oc-n.o:'o o~
r-ooo -.i
~n Pmrv yp~p~0u rv
PJ~ nyPO-~"~ nJPC
OOCOC O-~
JO You
.....u r a r.. aV wrn ~+ P~+
Y 1J
U wJT n
J_ nOO L ~Oa L 7'J UU9 7
+J~I.L n
ter. ~r~r rPw .i J[
1 rn 69 tiK w<~<t<
lVnw _ Y
<L -~ J a j
w> w]
i f JV i Y~<~ r7 16s
aZiY
~z ~ s>
:~wti
io' ~'<Ww
>:
_ ~V U~nJLrvu~
JS nYJ~
`ice
i JyuJ w>u~-J+
~. i 2 I
n )
J n
67~
-~ nK~u.~ x-20
f2 uF.~ .n< V7
+2 ~J
¢EJ
wJ2< ~]v.~r,~~
] I-Z.s ~JG ~n
' OOwJ wLJ
_ 4LLY~+
~ 'I 2~~? JZYC UJK<
wtn4w i'6S Qi{Ow<
~ %32-I .~~2 G~<J VL.ww GOG iV.r6 ~r .jii 9=0~YV U..].nYw
<.(tJ YI Ytu<4<~O.~K <.7 ~~
r2r,caa ~~~~w.~..od ~~~~.-~>_i~a`:i.r. +.amY ~.i 2<e Y..zu~L
,m ~- ~~rn '+~x'~:onn
Pnon
GOO~~VUn ~~O.~000 P.+P h600NO PO v~000 UN0- u~UO
G++ uOF ry0Y^OYI ti0u 3~fJ ~-n
.. i. a, rv .-. n .r Y O O .+
.n V .r m Ci ^ n ~.
3i
Pc~ u.dr~uy c-. Po.-N
i ~ n.mm.~~., .,.m-, ... .-,m mm.. .,mmr, ~. ~,mmT mom, mmm.,m m~., r.mmm m.m
v, i
i .. .. .. .. _ .. ~ .. .. .. z ..
x s x ~x
~~- n ~ i.-iU~ o o~ a r
e ,.~ .,, .e .°..a
i=~ ~ - on
ao - o sF
`z
x oa o
ii
___ ... G
n~~ _ ~nsn
mo
~< - - G~ si ~'~
__ I;~~: tee`
- F iF,<
.~ V u
L[~.[ri .~,~ij-JiljtsaY?.n~V a]6rty~-~¢u Kt~V V6U~'.JiT
~ ~ wY a u
U
y a. c) (a
VM1
f 1'Z 'l
u>u .3
.]T+. -.v r Vjnu
2 Un7 u+1'J> Vu
ajuw
-a V~nJ Uf]w V¢rv
- ~~. ai ozaW is
6 GSA ma.
~a `u~ sz
~ LO
+ V6K~2~ rOP at~LG Wr)o V2ZU< +,Yt
~ YZO~+~L X722 UZ~n NVu
'+UOG(=]GU1~LL tlM1U 6ua~1LL6 LL696 Ci Yr~YUOU VaR W'S. M1. u~cR i~
nLPU~Nf LUIOVinr WV O~Y "I SOP
io i mPV„VVY ~~ t'P ~jr JVF nVnrv W.J
~ .~ N .+ rv .~n V^l +.v M1ry .~ rvh an~rvnn ry rv.V
1
I moooryP WPOrvmm~+wnmooommdNpoooaooamop
• mc:°Op oool-n-.mop-oProPn+n~-P OONOOmoooomoomdao~
Zi Pw+wmmpNPNO OrynO PPrvadm~ +.~OwmF O~n PO~yO
mPPd~•u•mm rvOFrymY nONnPY•dryFN+n O
m mw ._• Om ...
y. n mnN'Yn nm N d m m
SI
(~
pOnmm+ r Pb .. mPOnrym+w r Pcnrym+mw
m mm bmm mpPP0000NO0000nnnnnn
Y~ mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmTmmm mmmmmTTmT mmmmm
= w F sw a
a ~w~
r n •-~ ..r .... M1••r .••-•.~ w •r.-. .~ ~
RK 1 RC KVK
nF~ L w O ~ L
_ ~-JYnMrHHI-n "'i y0i
n OWpO.J00000 j O p° ~ dU_]OJ Z;]
a0 'sW =WrtWrJ Ww•JW J ¢ Y WV J VIJNm
Y w0000000 1 n MTW O.p3
V ~Om 000 000 II•n V.n I Y~-iC0
VL ¢<zNm vFOOOSO00 n0~-„FYKdwdO<O~-OV
f0 w ?L n ryNNr~ pOSm6v6 ¢.~
I J~Ow6V« ~ FOOOOOOOOmmOJ3 iOK 1V¢O
w01001 ZW¢NOPOP~NOdNOOZ I.VrI LLmu•
NI n NOmYO d+mm1 W N~J V
~j¢~ ~ n modnJnm°:=m oV.n<NOiz•-•
<an z •.•I ~ r~i v¢mio< zNC•~F •..
L¢ J"o•on saioon.n.P `)z°~WVSUaum~m u<'.-~-o
- a wts>6VCawW=zw+W~y•np
3Y•~ m.px c +n mmmmT iw o...LLLLgW,~,~¢~ `
I-VS4< OREZ¢¢w
~OV /Wa ¢•+<2wy < +.+Wn +SJO<01-wZ wiu l"IKw<OVNY
L m Y6JpN<Oa~.~damad~OZU J2~•¢w¢¢¢uVVV=
•Z
oooono<
•. .~uupw
_ z
I oLO OO OO Lp o°u
V nt
ZN ¢ OOwwwww< _ w
.~i•S ww V L N y
OS •l1«<f « ~~
LJ .nW rw•r r_r ~n •-i ruH M t F
__ iLS 3LZS Ya V
•G ~-)<~n ,i2 ul3 w•/iuuuY. u.Viu= in ~< w ~n
T
w'J IL Wm ~opr°-~pJ<~J4«<tJ<J VJw VS r'i u Z
KVi ZF6pi-•rypN¢ VVVUUUU6in~i66in Z i
uLWOYm¢iziLO°zzmzzzLZZZw~sYaa.¢-z¢~ w<on.'.~i~
Vu vw Mi ¢¢'¢W¢y ~ JIVU•ur<¢ UJVr¢30
±wN Q•¢u<j w•Vi•y x W'</~~aOwJY•P-•ti iw-•-•ZVV Fm Cls
-i L O~ Z IE- ~-•Z- ~- I- n ~- r J
~"LL` °ZT<w=<rJ UJJSJOJ¢< wFF JW VJZNW<nn
a°~•<„~~.•ma::i,•,~,mnmz°O•°~~°~•°~I.~°m~nr vu •n •n °m ~.w.i<°.¢-~~:
NUNY
N KI yY .nN nyd Yn mNaN~l~P mm rvF nm.
0 a~mmm mTT TTTTnVNmm ryPlmm~Om vOFN+ma
~ Nn n.V .-••+n.~ ry rv N N rvN -'~Nn ~~N
/~
m°ow Wooo ~,'r °onn°r °o~°omo o,~
nv ,~ ao:,.;o m
O u~Of t e. ~O .G~v P
3~ m
`* r
P oyN mP
~s i mnn mmnnmF,mmmnnmmmri ran
V
u .-. ~ rn r. r. V
ZC vl>
7 ~ J F
WtJP 6rc ~.~ 'W.n W W
~P
>~ ~S
S <3~
Y }O
_ K i4 to
VGA Y
~70
~UrN~Z
a~]u0 O?
VaV
rvOJLn
x-~~'w~n'Nx~ ~u
iooW..w zj ~z>?ia'on
aw
a .wn :~~,~zR~2 ~,~w nnuLLa:uw
a
~ U UK
_ __ ~~ ¢
<Z • TY
YS .Sw ST2uVYmj~Y Zf tiO<
n]
i ~[C<Z~
uY w ri~ZUwo30
~O TSwzv¢>( Z
v»Ya w2Emr MAYO
~n xR 1<w~n u~f%rSV ZZUYu
O<pJW •aw
S
7JU>lu l~+Z 32RTLm230mN
a~ ~avoairvnw .. rv~nn~`~P n' /~
$..~ wsmemom I Y 24~-
c _ mom>mmm ~, ms
w ~~~ 86F
` m Ye:S
..s _~_ -____ ~ - `S.
a _ r -- ~£
~s.
^e FA '. h Y
~s ~ -_
oz a
_ a k+,
a" a - ~
e /~ ~~ .E
P ~ ~ ~ ~.
F
9
.. _g ~-_ _~. _..,.=:.fi of m'M1~,°^.iq=!IC~:ICFR~~K'm=F~am m'M1.^,S>_ ..
k°
•• - &~mbSbG&m°RmSe°m.".° e°,$6LL8LEC EL'LSS ~'&8&g~a&bm _Z mm
_°__m°°o-.~e-E'c'=-=ee5-~0e8~me88eS'o=e°o6o8€00=
-m.°Se$d8'.°^.wX=~89^°°<^mX:,^°..~9t<~=2 ~~~~p.^, 'b'm.~..m=~~~mn?.
C°4~'°F^S.=R^.mSAR&R~R R~SX.~°,S n88 ~.ArA ~L89'C>~g^mmm-°
em°'u'R RR4~42o992QpoQO m°mm..a emoc.-e>° msme.-.-n
o-mm mr. .~=r~ermo m°uA m°mes mm..e &m°cmmemmeeemmmeme~. .-a
,_~_Ae_amF88eOe 8°$8~~~ °.°R°hR€Fo °e eBeSa m°es2~~
%5~5588SSc~585° e -SSS - X58 °'SSoaS:'R
~ ..9 ... .._ _ ~ r _ _ .._~ _ .,_ __ _
S' s8 S`%R ~E888°°~88 P.E8 :;Re853 "-888
~ -.'a~`h~R8~8R~FR8A3o~3~e ~8a=8ooSSS88S°RRR~gB
S~~'
' RS° .~-,R38~3° ss33838538888588888e 030
_ ., ~d38er~rR%%83%S~~g~e~~~~%~e~80ge~%R%€%%888S~Re
--`°,88PS'kf~'>S~B ~S%rSR5S8&5588°=F&8S8o`=SSSs C'=ASSSE
m ABS.Sbmago°.SmII~SBm aN o°.° .°.i~°..&m.$Gm~&ffiS~Wom
m ~~5~a ~sa~a~~~ a~~V ~:~y~Ra
?~~r:~=. ~~~. ,}Y,h °' j€Y_~~'° ~.S Zvi 4~3~# .. ~ ~S'
-'N `~S'X'~'a Pss ;ssa~s~W .~^~af A~~a~s am ~~am~"s_Sa^~~
sn~~~r„~~~~~~,`sm~,`~~°°_'~_s~`sdssW~a~~=mw='-WmmmR
nx~.za°ex~,s°<.~,~e~~~.~~~°-=~4=ss~:v6e~9~~gesss~~
~ /~
° ~ e= Wa~'ava?es^s•°g•o~~'a~a~~"se's $s~ssa~~~~~s~gsas?s~sa~
~~ -- .. 3 ~~M ..zA~e4'~~A~1C ==.~-...5-'~^p~3e~8gr__~eK`~5:=~::
€ LLLTt LFFL882C8LYgFRii££Lt86LLLEYLCLYFFi tom.
`
'
c~~3~
" gve2rd
s$3aR=d$?:-p~s_L~ssdaec~?s3a i.^
.
' o_~se sa's 3sea'se'so?e3=?esas`s:ss'a a's oe_acecss
m?n~@ R nr.:;~E55=E,":Eer~4:l:p~YU%~Y3Ff°m'.e{6_~%S'.ois
RY§C8
'~'~
% %%%%F.t%%4R'i'IY'K~`i'RH%~~t ?°I%E~,%%Ri'%~,%9i$~g K'R C31~
a
'~Y~_.^.x a.4 Ai i'~<a 3Eg ~'a}~.mn'es-~e.'E~3fAn P. t'an?'E'.~f ?'nse°-.'^_°n n'
- 88°-88 - 88888Re8S888o888888888:°88888808888<
R8e8o = 8e%%%%%%%%e£fi5£%3 ^~%~%%~.~.%%Sg8RS§%08€
L ~~. _ eP ~ S&SFSFSFSF>3St8FS88SF§a%LSSF88RS~RZo
`t
}g, ~~ 888%~ R
~ 838SfiE38R888888888R889L~888888888R 8:.
5,,, %BveR a %%%%8%8%8%8%%%%F 8a%%%%8°-Stl%8%%8x%%g88
'~~s y 686:5 ~ C€SSSSSSS 5655S86F5855S~~SSSSsa5s 588$
~e
~6C 8ox8
' 888=8888888888%8888888:.°,88888888fr888
`
'~ e~S ~_~
~
L8 = ~R~g~~~~e~~~g~~8~~~e~8~~~e~S~~~~~geS
'~ S8SF5
~~ 6 55555FSSFFSFSt8F5885F%~~SSCF98SF 585>
i TiT&T LLSiiifiiiiLLTiTLLiLLLLSLL
i iiBiLLSim
_
. .
. .. ..
. --eee
..~ a ..
beeXeeeeeoeeee_~SeEedEE86"e~~_eR ^E~
^
u
1
~ ++4
~_~ ~ q ~
~~~~ ,~~'~'
~~ ~ '3Y Iii 1~~ ~. ..- .~, t
~ Y ~
~~
' @mla.8 ~. ..YY
.~
-~'"N ..~~s.. ~~~~ #~~A'~A3y~%81iM~„"'SA
~R3gb°
~: a~
°~s Y ~s- -.8 iY,%~iNe~ WG'y" ~~Y~~7 4i~_~..Y.a.
rc~~r
~•+k E~ G~6pperms~~ g~~'
~-~-
r
' ~~
~
~
L~B~~~hWE
~ffiKS~~~t
~~~
f
r
_ t+x
ssv~c ss:i e
_;
cccEe
a
i
Y
E ~ 3 s
/
~
~
W
aa g 66gg
~
~
~ esas~~
3 6~~~e~g8s$as
$~~~~~
€s~~~~$~~s~~s~~3lss~
g
avi =~FS__i-xipnaaz~~sos&# n - ~ __s_--„ ,. ;;~s~
~ ~ ~ ^~ -
L L8L6CLLLLL8LC6CLLL~L£g - ~i CCLLLLL CLL
egj ^^qFR=SF..3'3 ~=~K%RII: :~S=e~El~ _^~
z °ssa?s3's 'e asc??oLs3a "s'sz ~ i^. 2.s_e'sa ??'s
,~,I a~~~#e~BALSGSx1RR:C_.AiRA _ C X335.^^, .~.~~^ i RR4
-_ Y='F8i%L~887KII-S%%8eiRE S 1G~ESni~Ri CSS
- 8888888888888888888888 = 8 33888.1 :8L .°~ 888
~~,; 38868L83~8L8TGL8S8.°.88€ c ~ c~~~i~=s~ g ~~"s
~` c 888a8888888888888S888S ^_ 8 88885888 8 888
5E Y'~, 888Y8L8SL882L'SL8Lm£o6S ~ ~ gg$~~~~~g $ ~~#
`~1~ ~~ 8888888885888888888888 0 8 iSi880:8L 8 888
a. e" g~', 8~33~3~~3#~#~#~~~~~~~~ E ~ '.~_#:.ni$W::: a $3q
sasdasascesEriisst¢6st ~ k c#?E##si'e S ~#=
-fir ~ - ~ _ ---
~' ~W,! L~eLismLL~atiasasLEs#L sLSSSSSSS o iso
gaF3?z: c?a~3-?fi~R_ae es'sr's =died _as
~` e__e_oeoe---eeee.,eee esaaia8a's =
~a a'~?-rah„-#~ ~'x .. ~li_~34 ~r~ ~~ ~ ~:~~
_~ n:#i~e E3~~m sM»_~e ~G ~ ~~ ~#a'a'aa~:~¢ ; ~~~`~
~~
' P e ® ~~ a ( J e ~ p
i
~ ~2
E .~
S~
~s
>~
m~
C' f
~ s
g~~~ Y
!~R ~
rg~ g
~~
~ ~~
.'
E ~.
3 ~~
._".F3.^^. 3 ca.
^ ~E~G ~ ~ E~ ~
REL.
pAd° YCL
S.S $iei
~'~? 3
l.
es_s s's= q
s3a s
~
IIII RR iR. ~' F.~C ~ ~53~ 3
i
.3 ':s 3 55~
' F dp~5 6 a i
~- .~ . ii iwii ~ ~ R;
Y81,^
C ijX ~'~
~'~ ~
,
_ . . ~
~
5888
$~~II
8
3
RRII
"sE?
R
~
!iAR
l~FL
~
S
~
:
$:
~ ~rl
~{~
___ ~ - ~ C
sass a aaa s ssaa s a' s
~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ =~t~~. i ~ ~I ~
~~t#
$
dt~~
~
fiF9
~
$
k ~
x
888Y
~33fl 8
5 RR:
Y€# R
G CpC7
^3:~ A
F A
3 8~
~
~~
!
~~~8 a ?f?s ~ i3~3 ~ ~ o
~msm ::: a=_~ a
oeae a~~ ixass
z
e e
~~~~~ .~~ apd~ a -.
~~~~s e~~~ ~
~ r~
~:~~~ ~'
~ ~g~~ ~
~ Z
r=
i
~11:~ f
~ E~
E~1 ~1
~~~~$
a
~~~~
~
6i~~$ ~
~ i
1~
~~ ~t
~
/~
' Q G • i r ., iv
x_ .
Fx E
8.
C
e
$i
~ e
~
~ i
si e
s
~:
"a%~
Y
~kR C
cY .' 8:
F~
u a?
~ A:
~ ~
~ .
~Z,
~ ~~
--~ ~ ~ ~9
~ ~~ ~~ ~
8~
A
x
_. G' tY ~
^ ~ s ~ sa ss ~ a
E 3 i X ° ~ ~+' 3 ~~ £F e
~ ~?yy :~ ~ ~ ~ ~~yy p ~ ~
i_i ~zgzk is ~ ~"ati ¢ is s ~ ,g i g c
^° Y ° a i Y i~
=9iA S S 8- 8GF8 8 E ai8
i Via: R~~~ .~ ~ 8 ~ ~~.~~ E ~ ~ 3.T1_~ rC
sg; sss~ s # a = s~~s' a ~ 5 gee
` a ~~ icM1s_is sssssii ~ iscis ~ i s
g~~ i; aszna ..r=FFF~SS=_ 6eb'S- SF$X
g aa'aa'a~'si'aaaasa333 E3sxa Y~ii
YG~ ^ ^m°.^^^n.......>~.. ....r ~ .. .~..
G~~
tl
;~~ ~~ agE$ _~~_
6 L3E3JL3~~w `~~ ~6~~~ * E 3
xnnxabeeyE~°'rr3~ ::G~~ 9 ~ r:~
c~ ~3 6g 5 F s : o ~@ ~ 63yq e
£ € ag~~~}~~Yk~i~€~Y~Y~ ~ ~"t 1!!t~! ~e ~$ p~s 1a1YNY~
~ ~ ! E ~~D 6E ~ E !
@ ~ 9 G~ 6
8 E8 BF. 88 R R E~1t, ~ Y8
as i~ L" E ~ ,~~x IIII
~~yy g- - (~y ? {ayy y~5~y ~ ~~-yy - ~~y s
8 8 qE i y8 !.'. =fJ 7 i
r r G ~ w @ G
s x
se z
s" s' -
SL C E
as 'a ~ ~
as @ ~~~~
~ ~ I c
~ ~ aa~G
a ~
_ ~
~ ~ W ~ c g a
~~ ~ ~~ ~~ a$ ~i~~~ n ~ w
a
E
9
SI
a
k
S
^
i
~ ~ ...
_ ~
~< ' ~ JUN 2 ~ '.apy~~
~~ S Nf~Ieefwr Ir lw<w~r.w.r~.~_ ..__
C~
YRI[~fNM IA YY(~ ~t L7 1EC~!H I. T'K(1) bf IICFN5EL51 Ill[ 1q.
Iw O}NwwN rf Ablel`[ by E.prwfL gKlNI Eq
1901 ~wIrYY
~~ aUT1f
S®rYw.Cd.991f ~ VY eNii ®OYL ~~~
fh Y+T~p R.Yri COO[
r u;Wrifned E^'KIOPPNne /rr
' Mr
1
r~r /rrn~YN w /eMe IpXy
I
]. NAMf131 O/ A99EECAEXff]) temp. Iernil
Appfed order Sec 1YOXY Q
_ewT B1rAn Dyp [YYOYeO flh<Nee pale;
]. iY9N1) Cq ifANSAGil0ry31 fff tK.
M!
1
,_ 1150.00 T
__. IW.00
R ]1
e. Nenwd Welaa
fY C901
l lawiwdWWpe<--NwMr uN Lrple :
fkll t0pN~i11 f1N. ~-
~
dept f
YY
r ft'J]0 un ~..iaee.. ~ ~NO.N
rnrAl
6, IV hemre.e lkxwd. 1. An heaea Inud1
Slw irPe of li<mM ax-]1Hfl YvtYYdfr 9pol lYYYYYap dd Gry L:m:lel ]O
e. ;Yahn9 Addreu rr be.,.p l,ew n-wrnre.. ~erd sY ~~ ._;
0 Hwr rau erw b.rrr <arei<M d e INmyt 10. Moir Yor rew rialpled wr d Xw Ppr.uom d rM AkrMah<
Nrrrro0e Cem.<d Ana .qukno-r. of Me Prpenmrnl pw.
o-mrp p Xp Ac1f
I I F;Wo-n a "YES" on,wr p ipm< 9 w 10 en on oM<M1mwn .M1.<F Jwll M Meped psr d Mi< appFcalion.
1]. Appli<onyapwe lol fM anE monop« emEkyed in anwls li<enNd aemnw _iN Mme aX Me auel:finnan. n1 n l:•_
'Fr 1Fyn -eitl ^-' r::!ey G <w+r a ram n or +dnlad rnY of Me pevnr:ma d Tr AkeMdi< Mwope Cmfpl A<1MY
q SiAif Of GIIf0N1MA Cwnry of ._." W f~bl~ ___„pop,"...".."_ 6/15/89
rm •e.. .a_n.. ~... . .
.+:.•n anew ..e .-, .. .. _
y..nw • mm.. -
w _yn n. e4_ 4m
. nJ.w M ~~ISw. T, .r iy .~r_ .Y.. i,e+ ~_. f... w_n er wn_. M1 ..wan. _ r ~_.~ ..r .• .x- ~. .ei,n ~.
IX APPpCANT I '~~
YGk MERE .._."_..... _.. _...__._.___."____.. _ _."__.l..bi...~..v."...____
•MIICATION 11 TR1N79t~0A
IS S1AiF Gf CAIITONNIA Cwnry el lAY_JYevYQYm"_ ... .. .Pow ..{f-4/f Y.".._ ...
_ .we V.- _
_ .ey~n
15 aame.e yely.,•'a •,w Y •M•,' MA • • ~ ~] $pnalur.lu o{ il<m<eNJ IO L<en~rv mber~P
...__-___ ._ -_-r-
On Vor Wna Mlao ihu LYlr; Fw DrpenprrrE E'w OrllE
Arrpcned _ Eaorded ron<r.
fidwiery popn.
^......""___.__........"...._..__~....,_C0Mf5 AUIlED .......ij3Y/N.."...."__....__
eum
"'4ne.eM fee d..._......hk a .......... .. ......... URn m..."...". _._...lawq rb ..."____._..._..
19 lwonen Numbw oM Slrerl Gry and IiP Code Ceunry
NS M loptulll Ylrtl UpLM IfY) 19TtlY Bas Yf[y66tYtl ,_
LJ ~/ VUU UL'I ~+/ ~1
. .,~M~ ~,
~, , ' ;
1~ ~'u1~ ~((~ iJ~~~~y~) I ~ ~ ~„
uu~i ~j 5:,~~~ ~„ I \
IICI , I ~ ~~'~;~4; }~~~~~-`~;_6,,
~u
Iwo I I
~ i ~ I.-
..~`'%
I ,'
..~~i~
~~
Q~i~r~
~ ~:1"'u
8411 Foothill Blvd.
RANCHO CUCA'40NGA, CA. 91730
APNq 207-571-75
Prooerty Currently Zoned; Conmerical within Foothill Specific Plan
in Planninn Sub Area One
Zoning of Adjacent Properties;
North :Commerical (vacant) Foothill Specific Plan, Planning suh-area One
South U.P.S. Railroad/1ledium Residential
East U.°.S Railroad/ Medium Residential
!Jest :Commerical, foothill Specific P1an,Planninq sub area One
-~ 3
29 JUNE 84
joe torrez
..
'I
. ~
~
~ 9 -:
~
'
r.:..
.
`~
t
w
b .
N f.
JL
98
.
. I. If V IFIR Yw. hY Ilflr ymJwpa,,, Oin O.N
luyuc~ylaea ea wmxoue ona~s~ YCMYtfI t~q uCEWF13, ' EIIF w0
)« o.yvbwaE a Akaleay ....m,. c<Ib.l «
1001 e,wa.~ Rf<EWI ND.
u]611
Swaawao,cd.yvle d aOW®ile0
a °.•. tlea a tril6 c{ocxwlluf
~
i ~~ ~ . coof xts
iM .M.vRmd Mvbr oad.. b I]wR
IKanw. dwnb.d m bb.~ ! i lu.wd
2. NAMf(51 W ArRKMliIT I ~ imq, Iwm1
A{pyad u,dw Sav. ]tlY d2 ~]o
..~ [IM1rcf.a DRIR, Iaaoaeioa r. 6w. 6/15/a9
-
90IIIaYpeDSp, ApA
21'r{f51 d iLN5.1CilON(51 rfH
K
tt
~ R
~
._ _ Ra SSrL.
I
- 3 uo.oo
'e5
I
- I
i
~'
-~--
A, r+om. d amin... -~- .
ad sA.a
eo]e n..l..a Aw.
.~•^---a -- ._~-_ roue '
e n nam... lKmW, ._isfl_ALi--
SMr !rM al lkmr / M r..m,w. Im.dr
__ a.a _ _ Gry Lmibi Tv
8 Mailup Addrw ICI dlbrml bun S)-NUnbar oM ]baRl a r..,.
v ne.. ya, «w bwn cmrnbd d a IRim)i ID. Ib.. Y^n ^w noMad anY d tlv pmwan el M. 41e°F°li<
I.rmeq <omrN M w .qubl~om of M. Mpam...r p.r~
_ Io.riy b M. Atli
I t E.RIw o Y{5" amrm a n«w 9 w 10 m m anwfaam rln.F J.WI V darN Ra.t b rM. opp~ ~ dm
D. ~nw M r,ll mr wdeb `w grMl b w MRI~a a.~l W IM prwliwn aRM AIMdi<ula+wap Canwa IA~m
U 5!A!E 7f CAlllpb4 Cwnrr ol --__.-..JW-»~.----....Dab.... _.ypfn,_ .-.-
~~ - .. a~y,r ~ ._ ._.,_ ... _
r ...... ... w•w .. ~...
... n.r.. .r~Aw • 1,4 .~~. .rr...+ r.. ~ .~+wv~. e. n... r .. _..~... _~. ~ .w ~ ..~... .
4 +.~~-. i I/
SIGN HFRf ~ dIMX! '~
:Q _..._ .... .............. ..........
unacaraN ~r >:~rEwaan
IS SiAlE OF <AlIroRNtA Cawp d.-...-. W. •e~~IA-...-... .. Dab........ 6/1/89. .
.~~-a+ Y
' - nwr w
.....- . w ...,...., ....w,v u~,... v w,.~,.,
~6 Nom.Di nl Lmwtr___ 1) SyMary.)yliu~wbl le lio•v N~mbe,',I
._. I .__ _
DaRS:baI, `:call D. b /_ ~ at-11g 5!tl.
Osblulyer.2. saw:a ~. ~- ' r' ~ ~ ,j ~^~~~' ~ ~
Iv :«.~, ~~raame..:
ww r7 caa. cdary
~_ _ _ Rab eanARetm ._ __.. _._
Oa Ynl Wrtie L.laco TI1ir twv; Fm Oroanmewl ('~ Only
AMxM1ad~ ~ R.cwdRd mNra, ~ C
^ .. ._ ._ ..._...... ..-.. .... _COrIl4 MALL[D ...611lY9....__.
'~ bm.a4 rw al.. re, w..O,M,~... __ _ _ _ ORkR m. . , ..)aaRiyt W . ._ _. ..
,~ ~
~1~~°_
c7 The Sass Steer
~- ,i r- - - - - >~L
l~ --~~ ~~
__~ ~} ~.T_~~
;~ ~~
;\ 1 ~~~
__
~~ ~ n n r-l
° F I I [7j I ,,~~,,i
` -- ! I ~/ II_~_ MI
~J
~ ~ ~aQ Q ~
~Oo A~O~~
/~~~ ~ ~ (~i °~
the SNSSY SIEEK
8030 Vineyard Ave,
Rancho Cucamonga,Ca, 91730
APNR 207-102-15
Current Zoning: Conmercial Zone within Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan
in Planning sub area Two
Zoning of adjacent property;
North: Low Residential
South: Medium Residential
East Commercial Zone within Foohill Blvd Specific Plan -Planning area two nl
West Flood Control / Low Residential
~5
16 June 89
joe torrez
JU4 5 ';39
4 ~` J •Yr.• 4 M ~<rw Mnr
OMOIK !lNw~M tlOElpl1ll I '~ IPE(!1 .~f IICFN5E151
ie: Orpwgrwn N AlmAeli lrrrrapR CmOd lECEIRT NO,
ISOI daad.ar 6lcies .
car. vsele nn mwmm
sa<,~n..p w lads m • mu cEOCRann
,
~....r<..e.r„.,r..,..r Ears p(aL! cooE
.
M ~
^
i6
~~ b
1'
nhed
! Ib
m ~ I M
1. N9MF(!1 Of AI/IIGI+It(A LmP. Mm~l
ARpld unAV 5.[. ]6066 ~j
x'ant p~_~`•~f f!F[prr Oww I616vaw I E!r<!rr Ualr:
). TMry41 Of ]RANSACiION(!1 fFE li ~K'
S I
100.00 df
l6a~r
d, Nomr ei EaprN~
3. lo[0nen
91]0 Ns !n. 1101
C~rY and LP Ced. !Oanry I .__.. , S r--
d II hrm:rw trcwrW, ]. Ab h6mwv Inrgl
0 Horn YOU a.rr bwn [On.i<M d a NbnY] 10 Hmr yap ..rr nOlaM p^Y ai pr Po^~wN OI Me 11[ohOlic
lrn+apr CamrW An w rrpublera pl Mr pparNNnl a...
' snap q Mr MY ~
I I f.plarn a "YF!" On+.n q iNmr p w 10 on on ara<hm.a .nren Jrdl M drNrd pvr W M.. eppl;[p0an.
I} 6ppiicpnr opr6rr 101 rha 0M mnr:eprr rrnRlaYM in en.pN I:[rnrrd Praiw .pl he.r oll Mr GuaF![wlpn: al O h...r+e-. a^d
bl IM1aI hr .rll rpr rrOlab w [M w anrml q br •iWngd any 0< pa.i/m+ ei rn• AkoM1eM1C MrNaq ConM1pi qn
u
$I11F OE CAIIfpINU :00nry d .-.__.}!~ .._.-. _....OpN__.__...lj]5l09.-_.
m. '••rrti ~m ..... .' .
•~.~'..r.n r.0 _
w -.•r.. ~r:M1ah
.. +.r...'Yw rw .. .. e».. ~ r
I< 6Pp41CAki /
SIGN NERE ' ' 'rte _1-.'._..
7
.. __.__....._--__'__A-......._.-.__...... ..__ ...................._.. _......_.__........
~MtIC~T10N ~V 71AMf1~RW
IS S161F OE CAOfORNIA <wnry d ............ .._....._.._._ _._..._. DON._.___..... _.___....._... .-
. rrr .
.~pr~ rY l: s _
rwM ~~
i .r.. n~~4 +Ir.r.n .•r/. .J.ry ~+rr rb
_• ~ ~:.r .. M r r..•:~ a ....~~ .n rV ...n• ~.n~~u ..rw._. rr r..n..n.
to Yoe W.ye &loN iW flPr: Fw DrP^r(gr^e Vw gNIE 1 - --
~rq<hd '" Rr<wdd nwNr,
'-fiduraq PaW4 \vJI
"RrrNm6fw W_-._..-...hU w. ..... --- ..
'--_--- .._...__.-_-one[. on.....°--.-....a.p.iprw - _ -
~,
.]
m
O
m
~~
m
r
/ 9170 Haven Ave.
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730
APNA 209-262-17
Current Zoning: Within an Industrial Park
in sub area Six of the Indust-
rial Area Specific Plan and
with in the Haven Ave Overlap
W District.
R Zoning of adjacent property;
q North: General Industrial sub area SIX of
= Industrial Area Specific Plan.
South: General Industrial sub area SIX of
Industrial Area Specific Plan.
East General Industrial sub area ELEVEN of
Industrial Area Specific Plan.
u...t . r_a....._:,i ....,, rn¢ .,o
IndustrialuArea SpecificMPlan. - V
v
16 Jun 89
jcF torrez
COPY
._
__
..~. ~Bx.Hh4... <w uxa. 4..de..H.r. wN. a.p
AyKlCATION yOR AlCO1105K YIIRJAN L1CENfgn1 I ttR15) Of LICENSry51 filE E J.
TO: DePO•x."M d Abaholk Reewape Cxad RfCEIVT . O.
1901 R•euHw'OY Afi3]Sf
Sa.v:rna. fa51. 9fyly SAP Bvru[61m ::(:-vAle veer c Mine GEOf.RAE KAL
~wmrer ro.~ne:nuw o.~ COllf 1fi 15
TM u:rde<dpxe Mnby opplm I« Deh
Awrlm dxv:Aed m EOROIer loud
}, NAME(S) d AfflKAM157 irmp. fxmrt
Appped erNw Sx. 9tl4 (]
[BeMx ueeu Epxnx Dere,
:A9sL. noowaad J. iYVE(S) CN TRANSACBON(5) fFE fYyE
~
_ 4M ~ tOD. Jp ~tD
1 t
A
~r ip
A Nam. of Wtineee o
m41
~_
'~
~
S. EaOPOa of Euuneo-Numbx and SnM I
-~-
~mJ9-w )m[hf is vlon ~-
_ '
_
Clry aM TP Cede County ~ -- ' S
~. 91TP~LIDw [Glm_:_. _ _ LOtAt I 1]I:. pO
d, II yxmiM lkened, ] An yremne Imde
Snow iYW al Linnu Ory LmrnR __
! Morfnp Adnu (il diMnnr Irem !)-Number Od SnM w.
0 Ha.q Yau ern lmn mno<hd d e 1•bnYY I D Horq Yoe <. colald anv of MO pro.nrm< of M< AI<aholi<
Beenage Comrd AO a rpubRem of rM Oepanmmr per
nrrp h Me Ac0
11 Eaplprn o "YES" anrrer b rhmr 9 or Ip on an onaM1mem wb<n prop M tlxmed patl of Mi<opplimnon.
AppL:e-• a:y ~- - Oyed m -e M1<e ualAr el a e, aa..
'b~ rhw b +rll m .rOleh a u ro M aolaM any of rM ~po. ~ei`rM Almh011<M.uope~COenal ~Atlrr
IJ SLAJE Of CALIfORN1A Coonry el Swu_1LrrL[AEm...._.___...._.. Dah....... ti(]]L94 _: __. _
w ~..w
< AYVEIfANT -' v
SIGN HERE .......__.__.. _..__l...__.._....,, ...._____.. _._ _
A~~LICATION RY TRANSRROR
1! 541E Of CAUfORN4 Ceuery d........... . .........DON .......:....... ...
Id Namnln elleenxelll ti m.w~ e~10 5~ epl el E'oehebl ly Lcmh NUn•ber_
10 laanee Number ON SnM Crry and Gp Code Counq
Dn Nm Wntr Below TAu Line, Fo. DeEnnrmmr Cee Ody
Arra<ned~ - Rxwdd npnx,
^ fldu<rary paper.
'l ..__.. _ ........................ ......._...._ C091F5 MAIIED .__ ...?/1J/_pY.......... _..... .. ...
oum
^bne.olfx d.......... Jab a......._ ..... ........ ..... OIRx x_ _.._...Bxei9r Ne ....__.
- -- FOOTHILL 3L40, ---'- --- -------
- ~~--~ ..J,"
~ ~\_'
~~~ ~ ~
y
TABEL, Malik N. 8 Mohammad (gusiriess Not named Lo datef
yuiv- ~ rootni n ulvd.
Ranchr Cucamonga, Ca, 91730
APNM ?Ofl-301-11
Current Zonin Conmercial zone within Foothi~l Boulevard Specific Plan
Planning sub area Three
Zoning of ad is cent property;
Ho rth Conine rcial Zone within Foothf li Blvd Specific Plan/
Low Residential
South Low Residential Zone
East Consnercial Zone within Foothill Blvd Speciric Plan
W.c st Conine rcial Zone within Foothill Blvd Specifi r. Plan!
Low Residential Zone
19 JUN 89
,{oe torrez
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 5, 1989 ~~
T0: City Council and City Manager /,
i
FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Michael D. Long, Senior Pub11c Nor s Inspector
SU&1ECT: Authorize the advertising of the "NOt1ce Inviting Bids" for
the Sapphire Parkway Renovation and Retrofit (Banyan Street
to north of Jennet Street) Improvement Proyect, to be
funded from Beautification Funds, Account No. 21-4647-8723
(FY 88/89)
RECQNIEIOIITION:
[L is recommended that C1ty Council approve plans and specifications for
the Sapphire Parkway Renovation and Retrofit (Banyan Street to north of
Jennet Street) Improvement Protect snd approve the attached resolution
authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting B1ds'.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The subject project plans and specifications have been completed by J. F.
0zvidson Associates. Inc.. reviewed by staff and approved by the City
Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction is 561,535.00. Legal
advertising is scheduled for July 11, 1989, and July 18, 1989, with the
bid openin at July 21, 1989, 2:00 P.M.
Resy'r ul j-bdtted, _
J
Attachment
3~p
RESOLUTION N0. ~ ( "~ ($
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "SAPPHIRE PARKNAY RENOVATION AND
RETROFIT (BANYAN STREET TO NORTH OF JENNET STREET), IN
SAIO CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK
TO ADYERTISE TO RECEIVE BI05.
NHEREAS, it is tha intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Lo construct
certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and
specifications for the construction of certain improvements.
NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY
RESOLVES that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho
Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for
"Sapphire Parkway Renovation and Retrofit (Banyan Street to North of Jennet
Street)".
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and
directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or
proposals for doing the work specified 1n the aforesaid plans and
specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially 1n the
following words and figures, to wit:
"NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS"
f YI iYYPt W O IIC"UIYLI UII UI LIIC LU YIILII UI UIC LI L) UI I,OI0.11U WLaMUI11fG,
San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY
GI YEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the
City Clerk fn the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the
hour of Z:00 o'clock P, M. on the 21 day of July 1989, sealed bids or proposals
for the "Sapphire Parkway Renovation and Retrofit (Banyan Street to north of
Jennet Streetl" in said City.
Bids will be opened and publicly read imcedtately in the office of the
City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
g{ds must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of
SaDDM re Parkway Renovation and Retrofit (Banyan Street to north of Jennet
Streetl.
PREVAILING NAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the
provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1
and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing
rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in
which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing
rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the
Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California
is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem
31
wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the
office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road,
Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested
party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such
detenainations to be posted at the Job site.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or
mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, tf such
laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing
rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached
contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of'the
previsions of said Labor Code.
In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code
as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and 1n accordance with the
regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured
apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work.
Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1717.5 and 1777.6
of the Labor Code comcermimg the employment of apprentices by the
Contractor or any subcontractor under him.
Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor
employing tradesmen in any apprenttceable occupation to apply to the Joint
apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works protect and
which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a
certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of
apprentices to Journeymen that will be used in the performance of the
contract. The ratio of apprentices to tourneymen in such cases shall not
u2 1255 u,d,l olio to 1112 2w~2Nt.
A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the Sutnt apprenticeship
committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior
to the request for certificate, or
e. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a
ratio of one to Five, or
C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its
membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis
statewide or locally, or
D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered
apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not lets
than one apprentice to eight tourneymen.
The Contrac~~r is required to make contributions to Funds established for
the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered
aDDrentices or tourneymen in any apprenttceable trade on such contracts and 1f
other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions.
3~--
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the
requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and
other requirements may be obtained from Lhe Director of Industrial Relations,
ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or
from the OT vision of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices.
Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all
workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any
subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the
State of California having to do with working hours as set forth 1n Division
2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California
as amended.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic
employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under
him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during
which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor
more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to paq travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed
to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence
payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed
in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8.
The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified
check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount
equal to at least ten percent (l0i) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee
1A~• •Fn HI AAer will sofa.. inhn the n enA rn n~narh 1F fhn a a,e (e a„anAeA
to him, and in event of failure to enterninto such contract said cash,y
cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall became the property of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga.
If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest
bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the
City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second
lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder.
The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the
contract for said work shalt be one hundred percent (1001) of the cantra,:t
price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent
(SOb) of the contract price far said work shall be given to secure the payment
of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the
work contrar.ted to be done by the Contractor, Or any work or tabgr of any kind
done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a
certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon
work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the
said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work.
No proposal will be considered from a Contra~cor whom a proposal form has
not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
33
Contractor shall possess a Class "A' Licerse (General Engineering
Contractor) in accordance with the provl5i:r~; of the Contractor's license Law
(California Business and Professions Code, Srtion 7000 a*.. seq.) and rules
and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at t~R time tfine this tontract is
awarded.
The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and
speciftcattons of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the
City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of
the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer,
will 6e furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment
of ;35.00 said ;35,00 is nonrefundable.
Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications
will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above,
together with an additional nonretmbursable payment of ;20.00 to cover the
cost of mailing charges and overhead.
The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract
satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General
Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work
contracted to be done by the Contractor, tM Contractor m4y, upon the
Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute
authorized securities in lieu of monies withheid (performance retentionl.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any
and all bids.
m. _d__ -e th" ~' ^il ^s tw. ~,• ..c o. .. h.. ~~. .. r.li s" .i"
.y ~~ .~ ,. ...,~. .. . v ...... __....^.~L, _. .. _.
Dated this day of 1989,
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, this day of 1989.
ATTEST:
er
ADVERTISE ON JULY 11, 1989
JULY 18, 1989
3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
GATE: July 5, 1989
T0: city Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Michael D. Long, Sr. Public Norks Inspector =/ :.~
SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the 'Notice Inviting Bids" for
Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the intersections of
Haven Avenue and 7th Street and Archibald Avenue and Lenora
Avenue, to be funded from S8 325 T.D.A. Fund, Account
Numbers 12-4637-8873 and 12-4637-8872, respectively
(FY 89/90)
pECOMMEIOATION:
It is recoawonded that C11;y Council approve. plans and specifications for
Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the lntersectlans of Naven Avenue
and 7th Street and Archibald Avenue and Lemon Avenue, and approve the
attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice
Inviting Bids'.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The subiect project plans and specifications have been completed 4Y
En9lneer.~~~The" Engineer's ~estlmete for construction is 85,000 each
location. Legal advertising is scheduled for July 18 and July 25 with
the bid opening m August 3 at 10:00 A.M.
y submitted,
RHM:MDL:sd
Attachment
J ~
RESOLUTION N0. ~ / "~ / /
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY
LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF HAVEN AVENUE AND 7TH
STREET AND ARCH[BALD AVENUE AND LEMON AVENUE", IN SAID
CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLEAR TO
ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS.
MHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct
certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and
specifications for the construction of certain improvements.
NOw, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY
RESOLVES that the plans and specifications presented by the GTty of Rancho
Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for
"Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the intersections of Haven Avenue and
7th Street and Archibald Avenue and Lemon Avenue.".
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and
directed to advertl5e as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids ar
proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and
specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantiaily 1n the
following words and figures, to wit:
"NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS"
Pursuant to a Resolutfon of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY
GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the
City Cierk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the
hour of 10:00 o'ciock A.M. on the 3rd dqy of August 1969, sealed bids or
proposals for the "Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the intersections of
Haven Avenue and 7th Street and Archibald Avenue and Lemon Avenue" in said
City.
Bids will be opened and publicly read lmaedtately in the office of the
City Cierk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Bids oust be made on a form Drovided for the purpose, addressed to the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "B 1d for Construction of Traffic
Signals and Safety Lighting at the intersections of Haven Avenue and lth
Street and Archibald Avenue and Lemon Avenue".
PREVAILING NAGE; Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the
provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1
and 2, the Contractor 1s required to pay not less than the general prevailing
rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in
which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing
rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the
3(~
RESOLUTION N0.
PAGE 2
Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California
1s required to and has deterwined such general prevailing rates of per diem
wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the
office of the City C)erk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road,
Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested
party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such
determinations to be posted at the ,)ob site.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, wrkman, or
mechanic esgloyed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such
laborer, wrkman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing
rate of wages herelnbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached
contrast, by him or by aRy subcontractor under him, in violation of the
provlslons of said Labor Code.
In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code
as amended by Chapter 911, Statutes of 1939, aad to accnrdamre with the
regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured
apprentices mqy be employed in the prosecution of the writ.
Attention is directed to the provlslons Tn Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6
of the Labor Code concerning the eaployment of apprentices 4Y the
Contractor or any subcontractor under him.
Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor
employing tradesmen to any apprentlceable occupation to apply to the ~otnt
..ti..ri,. .,.~,~t t.., _ .t tr..i ~w ..e t~...,..~1 ~. ..t. ...,...t .w
which administers the a renttceshi - ~~ y- - ~~-~-~
DD P Drogram in that trade forte a
certificate of approval. TMe certificate will also fix the ratio of
apprentices to ,journeymen that will be used in the performsnce of the
contract. The ratio of apprentices to ,journeymen in such roses shall not
be less than one to five except:
A. Nhen unemployment in the area of coverage by the ,joint a~py~rcnticesAlp
committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior
to the request for certificate, or
8. NhM the number of apprentices to training 1n the area exceeds a
ratio of one to five, or
C, Mhen the trade can show that 1t is replacing at least 1/30 of its
membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis
statewide or locally, or
D, Mhen the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered
apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less
then one apprentice to eight ,journeymen.
37
RESOLUTION N0.
PAGE 3
The Contractor 1s required to make contributions to funds established for
the administration of apprenticeship prograes if he employs registered
apprentices or ,fourneymen 1n aRy apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if
other Contractors on the pu611c works site are arcking such contributions.
The Contractor and subcmtractor under him shall comply with the
requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and
other requirements WAY be obtained Fran the DT rector of Industrial Relations,
ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or
from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices.
Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all
workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any
subcontractor under him shall coagiy with and be governed by the laws of the
State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division
2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California
as amended_
The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic
employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under
him, upon arO~ of the work hercinbeforc mentioned, for each calendar day during
which said laborer, workman, or mechanic 1s required or permitted to labor
Wore than eight (8) hours to violation of said Leber Code.
Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pAy to each workman needed
to avnrute iM rnr# romA,wl by fMa rnnfra{i a< <p~h hwavsl anA egheTahnro
payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed
in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8.
The bTdd~~ .uat submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified
check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount
equal to at least ten percent (lot) of the amount of sold bid as a guarantee
that the bidder will enter Into the proposed contract 1f the same is awarded
to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash,
cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall became the property of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga.
If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest
bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the
City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second
lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder.
The amount of the bond to 6e given to secure a faithful performance of the
contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (loot) of the contract
price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent
(50:) of the contract price for sold work shall be given to secure the payment
3g
RESOLUTION N0.
PAGE ~
of clams for any meterfals or supplies furnished far the pcrforwance of the
work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of aqy kind
done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a
certlfiwte that he carries compensation insurance covering his emplgyees upon
work to be done under contract which may be entered iMO between him and the
said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the constwction of said work.
No proposal will be considered from a Contractor wham a proposal form has
not been issued by the C1;y of Rancho Cucamonga.
Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (General Engineering
Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law
(California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 eL. seq.) and rules
and rcgulat+^as adopted pursuant thereto at the time time this contract is
awarded.
The work is to be doiro 1n accordance with the profiles, plans, and
speciftutloos of the C1T,t of Rancho Cucamonga m file is the Office of the
City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of
the plans and speciflcatians, available at the office of the City Engineer,
will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment
of f35.00, said 535.00 1s nonrefundable.
Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and speciflcatlons
will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above,
together with art additional nonrel~ursaDle payment of f15.00 to cover the
cost of mailing charges and overhead.
The successful bidder will be required t0 enter Into a contract
satisfactory to the Ciq~ of Rancho Cucamonga.
In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the general
Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Speclflcatlons regarding the work
contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the
Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost end expense, substitute
authorized securities 1n lieu of monies withheld (perfomm~ce retention).
The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any
and all bids.
39
RESOLUTIDN No.
PAGE 5
8y order of the Council of the C1ty of Rancho Cucaaionga> California.
Dated this 5th day of JuIY .1989.
PASSED AND ADOPTED Dy the Council of the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, this 5th day of Ju_~V_, 1989.
or
ATTEST:
e
ADVERTISE ON JULY 18 AND JULY 25
O
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF ftEPOftT
DATE: July 5, 1989
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager
SUBJECT: Consideration of a resolution authorizing the expenditure
of redevelopment funds on certain public improvements
associated with the development of a Sears Consolidated
Credit Center.
BACKGROUND: In May, 1989, the Agency approved, in concept, a
reimbursement of the costs of certain public improvements
associated with the development of a Sears Consolidated Credit
Center, located a[ the southwest comer of Milliken Avenue and Sixth
Street. These costs all relate directly [o [he additional right-of-way
dedication required by the City.
This item relates directly to item number 2 of the Redevelopment
A venev avenda. The attached City resolution makes the same
findings as those contained in the Redevelopment Agency resolution.
RECOMMENDATION: Approved the attached resolution authorizing
the expenditure of redevelopment funds on certain public
improvements associated with the development of a Sears
Consolidated Credit Center.
ANALYSIS: Health and Safety Code, Section 33445, requires that the
legislative body, the City Council, approve the expenditure of
redevelopment funds for public improvements. The attached
resolution makes the following findings:
• that the public improvements to be constructed are of
benefit to the Project Area. The public improvements
funded under the terms of the Owner Participation Agreement
are necessary to provide adequate traffic circulation for the
immediate area of Milliken Avenue and 6th Street, and also for
the north/south traffic on Milliken. Thus, these improvements
provide benefit well beyond the site of the Seazs Credit Center.
• that there is no other reasonable means of financing the
public improvements. Due to the extended benefit azea of
these particular improvements, it is unreasonable to burden one
development project with the full costs of the improvements.
Respectfully submitted,
ate,., ,o .~~
Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager
~~ /f
REEOLDTIOd NO. ~~ W
A R880LDTIOd OF THB CODMCIL OF T8E CITY OF
RAdCEO CDCANOdOA R66ARDIN6 A PROJECT
8Ed81ITId0 THE RAdC$O REDSVSLOPNENT PROJECT
AND dAEINO CEATAZd FINDINOE IN R80ARD T8ER8T0.
A. Reoitale.
(i) The Community Redevelopment Law of the State of
California (Health and Safety Code Sections 330G0, et seq.),
among other provisions granting powers to redevelopment agencies,
contains Section 33445 which provides that a redevelopment
agency, with the consent of the legislative body, may pay all or
part of the value of the land for and the cost of the
installation and construction oP any building, facility,
structure or other improvement which is publicly owned, either
within or without a project area, upon a determination by such
agency and such legislative body by resolution that such
building, facility, structure or other improvement ie of benefit
to such project area and that no other reasonable means of
financing the same are available to the community.
(ii) The officially adopted redevelopment plan as
heretofore amended of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency ("the
Agency" hereinafter) for its Rancho Redevelopment Project
provides in part for the construction of community facilities to
s?rve said protect area, including facilities described below.
(iii) Attached as Appendix "1" is a document which
provides for the Agency's funding of public improvements to
4I~ 1
Milliken Avenue and Sixth Street from tax increment resources in
a specified amount ("the Public Project" hereinafter).
(iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this
Resolution related to the Public Project have occurred.
E. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it found, determined and resolved by
the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby finds that the facts set forth
in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The City oP Rancho Cucamonga hereby consents to
the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency's paz^tial funding of
the costs and expenses related to the Public Projects specified
in Appendix "1" hereto pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section
33445.
~:_
.• ...... ..o..nG.. ..e~cuy e~,o..iiiuaiiy iintia and
determines that the construction of the Public Project by and
through Agency's partial funding will be oP benefit to the
Agency's Rancho Redevelopment Project.
4. This Council hereby specifically finds and
determines that no other reasonable means of financing is
available to the community to construct the Public Project other
than through the Agency's partial funding thereof as specified in
Appendix "1" hereto.
5. Pursuant to California Health and Safety Code
Section 33421.1, this Council hereby finds that Agency's
~i c
provision of public improvements which the owners or operators of
the site within the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area may havN
been required to provide as specified in Appendix "1" hereto is
necessary to effectuate the Rancho Redevelopment Plan.
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of ,
1989.
Mayor
I, , City Clerk of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution
was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
rifer nF Dannhn M1an aannnr~~ bnlA •6..
_..._. ____ _____._ ~_ .~~~~ ~.. .s __ "f .. ,
1989, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of
1989, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ATTEST:
C ty Clerk of the C ty~
Rancho Cucamonga
s~:+l~ccusrt,:lxc :s.s ~ ' .1/ 3
011NAA PARTICIPATION AOREEMLAT
This owner Participation Agreement is made and entered
into by and between RANCHO CDCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
("Agency" hereinafter) and GENESIS REAL ESTATE GROUP I, a
California joint Venture ("Developer" hereinafter).
~STNEff&ET.H-
A. Reci~ala.
(i) Agency is a public body, corporate and politic,
exercising governmental functions and powers and organized and
existing under Chapter 2 of the Community Redevelopment Law of
the State of California and having its office at 9720 Baseline,
Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701.
(ii) Developer ie a California ,joint Venture having
its office at 139 East Huntington Drive, Monrovia, California
91016.
(iii) Developer is presently purchasing and will own
fee title in and to that real property specifically described in
Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by thin
reference, generally located at the aoutheaet corner of Milliken
Avenue and Sixth Stzeat within the City of Rancho Cucamonga and
within Agency's Rancho Redevelopment Proiact and hereinafter
referred to as "the site."
(iv) The purpose of thin Owner Participation Agreement
is to implement the Redevelopment Plan !or the development of the
1
~'
site on the terms and conditions contained herein. The
development o! the site pursuant to this Owner Participation
Agreement is in the vital and best interests of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga and the health, safety and welfare of its
residents and is in accord with the public purposes and
provisions of applicable state and local Law. Specifically, the
site shall be developed with a complex designed to house 1,000 or
more employees thereby providing substantial employment
opportunities within the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
e. acraeaant.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants
contained in this Owner Participation Agreamanl, the parties
hereto agree as follows:
1. Sn consideration of Agency's covenants herein
contained. Gvalonar harabv aarwwe fn nnn.~„irr anA A.v.lnn „_
cause to be conatructad and developed on the Bite a development
which contains at least approximately 50,000 square feet o!
office space, capable of housing at least 990 employees on a 24-
hour, multi-shill basis ("the development" hereinafter).
Developer further agrees that iha development shall be complete
and occupied on or before September 1, 1990. Said date
referenced hereinebovn in this paragraph 1 hsreinafter is
referred to as the "scheduled completion data." Developer shall
be entitled to extensions of the scheduled completion date as are
equal to delays in the construction on and development of the
2
41r
site which are flue to acts of God, acts oP the public enemy,
fires, floods, epidemics, quarantines, strikes, lockouts, freight
embargoes, unusually severe weather, or from any other cause,
whether of the same type as the Foregoing, or not, but only if
any such delay from any of the foregoing specific or general
causes is beyond the control and without the fault or negligence
of Developer. If Developer contends that any sucR delay or
delays has or necessarily will occur, Developer shall give
written notice of such contention and the contended period of
delay to Agency with sutlicient documentation and data to support
6tlCh contention. Should Agency desire to dispute such
contention, it shall do so in writing within thirty (70) days of
its receipt of Developer's written notice. It Agency tails to so
notify Developer, Agency will be eetopped from later disputing
Develooer~s contention. If Develooer and Aaenev aarew aw to env
such contention and as to the amount of time to be encompassed by
any such extension, Developer and Agency shall reduce said
agreement to writing and shall execute the same as an addendum to
this Agreement.
Any and all disputes relating to any such contention
regarding a claimed extension of the scheduled completion date
shall be settled and decided by arbitration conducted in
accordance with the Commercial Arbitration Rules o[ the American
Arbitration Association, as then in affect. Any such arbitration
shall be held and conducted before three arbitrators who shall ba
3
4- U
selected in accordance with the provisions set forth in said
Rules. Moreover, the prevalling party in any arbitration shall
6e awarded reasonable counsel fees, expert and non-expert witness
costs and expenses and all other costs and expenses incurred,
directly or indirectly, in connection with said arbitration, and
all costs and fees of said arbitrators shall be borne exclusively
by the non-prevailing party. The award rendered by the
arbitrators shall be Pinal, and judgment may be entered upon it
in accordance with applicable law in any court having
jurisdiction thereof. The provisions of Title 9 of Part 3 of the
California Code of Civil Procedure, including Section 1283.05
thereoL permitting expanded discovery proceedings, shall be
applicable to all matters ahich era arbitrated pursuant to this
paragraph i. This agreement to erbitrata shall be specifically
wnPorrwahlw undwr rh• nrwwilinn wrhi Mw4(nn ley, u,.f ln. ..• •w..
demand for arbitration shall ba filed in writing by Developer at
the nearest office of the American Arbitration Aseocietion to the
City of Rancho Cucamonga. The demand for arbitration shall ba
made by Developer within shirty (30) days after Developer's
receipt of Agency's written dispute of Developer's contention for
extension of the scheduled completion date.
2. Agency agrees that if the development is complete
ana occupied on or before the scheduled completion data or any
extension thereof determined in accordance with the provisions of
paragraph 1 above, Agency shall within thirty (30) days of such
a
41 I f
completion remit to Developer the sum of $1'O;nOr,00 as and for
Agency's contribution to the construe*_ion of the public
improvements to Milliken Avenue and Sixth Street upon which the
development has been conditioned. Due to Agency's defraying
costs related to said public improvements, Developer shall cause
the same to be bid, contracted for and completed in compliance
with the provisions of the California public Contracts Code and
the cal ifornia Labor Coda applicable to public projects.
7. Attached hereto ae Exhibit "B" are Sections 33445
and ]]4]6 of the California Health and Safety Code. Tha
provisions and raquiramenta thereof are hereby made a part of
this contract and Developer agrees to fully carry out all of the
provisions of those sections, including, but not limited to,
refraining from an}• sets of diaerimination therein sat forth and
including the insartfon fn env deeds or iwaawa of thw nrnviainna
therein set forth and to require in every such deed or lease that
its grantee or lessee and their respective grantees, lessees and
sublessees, whether immediate or madlata, insert like provisions
in any further dead, lease or sublease.
4. This Agreemant shall not ba assigned in whole or
in part by Developer without Developer first obtaining the prior
written consent to any such assigmm~nt by Agency.
5. Any and all notices, requests or other
communications required or permitted to be given under this
Agreement or by reason of this Agreemant shall ba in writing and
5
shall be deemed to have been given when delivered in person, or
five (5) business days after ma111nq by certified or registered
mail, return receipt requested, first-class postage prepaid, if
mailed in the State of California, or seven (7) business days
after so mailing elsewhere in the continental portion of the
United States of America, or the date of actual receipt as
indicated on the return receipt, whichever date Pirst occurs; or
ten (10) hours after the time dispatched by telegram or cable; in
every case addressed to the parties hereto as follows:
A. If to Aganey, to:
RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
9320 Baaa11M, Suite C
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701
Attention: Ms. Linda Daninls
and
I, .,..........
Number One Civic ,Center~Circla
Post Office Box 1059
Brea, California 92621
Attention: Mr. James L. Markman
B. I! to Developer, to:
GENESIS REAL ESTATE GROUP I
139 East Huntington Drive
Monrovia, calilornia 91016
Attention:
or such other address or addressee ae the party addressed may,
from time to time, designate in writing in the manner herein
specified. Any notice dispatched by telegram or cable shall be
6
~} I ~
reaffirmed by the sender within twenty-four (24) hours by mailing
a confirming latter in the manne!~ here inabove specified.
6. In the event that either party hereto brings any
action at law or suit in equity in relation to this Agreement, or
to declare such party's rights under this Agreement, the
prevailing party in such suit or action, on trial or appeal, in
addition to all other sums to which it may be entitled, may call
upon the non-prevailing party to pay a reasonable sum for its
attorneys' Ease and to pay all other coats :.nd expe~.sea that have
bean incurred by the prevailing party, either directly or
indirectly, in connection with said action or suit, as shall be
fixed by the court.
7. Nothing in this Agreement, whether expressed or
implied, is intended to confer any rights or remedies under or by
.e.a.... „r tn. fe.... ...n ...-....~.a..... w.~...• .... ............... ...w....
than the parties to it and their respective successor and
permitted assigns, nor is anything in this Agreement intended to
r.eliave or discharge the obligation or liability of any third
person to any party to this Agreement, nor shall any provision
hereof give any third persona any right oP subrogation or action
over or against any party to this Agreement.
8. Unless otherwise required by a specific provision
of this Agreement, time hereunder is to ba computed by excluding
the first day and including the last day, unless the last day is
a Sunday or a legal holiday, and than it le to be excluded.
7
~I k
9. Each party to this Agreement agrees to cooperate
by performing any further acts and by executing and delivering
any and all additional documents which may be reasonably
necessary to carry out the terms and provisions oL this
Agreement, and each party to this Agreement agrees that it will
not act in any manner whatsoever which would hinder, impede,
interfere with or prohibit or make more onerous or difficult Lhe
performance of the other party hereto under this Agreement.
10. To the best knowledge and belief of the parties to
this Agreement, this Agreement contains no provision that is
contrary to any Federal, state or local law or to any regulatory
requirement or other ruling or regulation of a federal, state or
local agency or that would be in breach of the obligations of
either or both of the parties hereto under the terms and
provision of this Agreement, or any part thereof, shall at any
time be held to be invalid, in whole or in part, under any
applicable federal, state or local law by a court of competent
jurisdiction, or by arbitrators or an administrative agency of
the federal, state or local government with proper jurisdiction,
then such provision or a portion thereof, ae appropriate, shell
remain in effect only to the extent permitted, and the remaining
provisions hereof shall remain in full force and •ifact and shall
in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated, unless the
8
y' I L~
invalidated provision(s) shall uniquely, materially and adversely
affect the rights and obligations of a party to this Agreement.
11. No delay or omission to exercise any right, power
or remedy accruing to either party to this Agreement upon any
breach or default of the other party to this Agreement shall
impair any right, power or remedy of the non-defaulting party nor
shall it ba construed to be a waiver of any such breach or
default, or acquiescence therein or thereto, or of or in any
similar breach or default thereafter occurring; nor shall any
waiver of any single breach or default by either party to this
Agreement ba deemed to ba a waiver of any other breach or default
theretofore or thereafter occurring. All remedies, either under
this Agreement ox by law, equity or otherwise, shall be
cumulative and not alternate.
12. This Aarwwmwnf wed Tha inahlv,mnnha n ref n,n as ~.
referenced herein contain the entire and exclusive agreement
between the parties to it, and no promise, representation,
warranty or covenant not included in this Agreement have been or
are being relied upon by any party to this Agreement. All
obligations of Agency and Developer under this Agreamant are
expressly stated, and no other obligations, conditions or
covenants era to 6a implied hereunder. Each party to this
Agreement has relied or is relying upon its own examination of
the terms and provisions of this Agreamant, the counsel of its
own advisors, and the warranties, reprasantatlons, duties and
9
~~M
~. ~ ~.-.
~ ~~~ ~~A~ ~ ~~
covenants contained in t~iis Agreement. Moreover, the terms and
provisions of this Agreement may not be changed orally, but only
by an agreement in writing duly executed by the party against
whom enforcement of any waiver, change, modification, extension
or discharge is sought.
12. This Agreement and any amendment thereto may be
executed in one or more counterparts, with the same legally
binding effect as if all signatory parties were signatories to
the same counterpart. If requested, any signatory party hereto
will furnish the other party hereto with a duplicate original
counterpart of this Agreement or any amendment thereto, bearing
said signatory's signature.
la. The terms and provisions of this Agreement shall
not cause the parties hereto to ba construed in any manner
what.anwvwr as na Mnara. in{nf van*nra.~a _ ~..~. n~ eanh nfhnr
in the performance of their respective duties and obligations
under this Agreement, or subject either party to this Agreement
to any obligation, lose, charge or expanse of the ocher party
unless the party to be held responsible has indapandently
contracted with the clai cant so ae to make it directly
responsible for the per!'ormanca and/or payment, as appropriate,
of the pertinent ribligation, lose, charge or expense.
15. sho_Qd any provision of thin Agreement require
interpretation, i.t is agreed that the parson or persona
interpreting ar construing the same shall not apply a presumption
10
4-N
that the terms of this Agreement shall be more strictly construed
against one party by reason of the rule of construction that a
document is to be construed more strictly agalnsL the party
thereto who itself or through its agents or counsel prepared the
same or caused the same to be prepared; it being agreed that the
agents and counsel of all of the parties hereto have participated
equally in the negotiation and preparation of this Rgreement.
The language in all parts of thin Agreement shell be in all cases
construed simply, fairly, equitably and reasonably, according to
its plain meaning and not strictly for or against any of the
parties hereto.
16. Time is expressly made of the essence of each and
every provision of this Agreement.
17. The provisions of this Agreement shall inure to
~ha hana~i~ of and ha M nM nn unnn hha na rPiaa hararn anA hhair
respective successors and permitted assigns.
18. No remedy or election hereunder shall ba deemed to
he exclusive but shall, wherever possible, ba cumulative with all
other remedies at law or Sn equity.
19. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted
in accordance with the laws of the State of calilornia.
11
~I ~
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed
and entered into this Agreement as of the date set forth below
opposite the name of each such party.
GENESIS REAI, ESTATE CROUP I,
a California ,joint Venture
Dated•_~~ Ey ..
RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Dated
naron• ~~
sUfsa~COam~R us 12
4I~
Parcels 2 and 4 of Parcel Map No. 9896, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County
of San Bernardino, State of Califomia, as shown by Map on file in Book 109,
page(s) 41 to 43 inclusive of Pazcel Maps, Records of San Bernardino County,
California.
t 77196. OWlpatlon of kaasa aM pnhsen b nfNn !row dbulnlnatbm nvndleerlnlna•
tbn nM mwpeplbn davse
Agetnds dull ob8pb hwaw and prduam of ml property unwired in mdarebpnwnt projeela
and owner of property improYed u • put e[ • eedeyebpnwnt project b nfrw from m4kfing the
mb4 ask, n kaaa of tlw prapeety m tM 6aaia of ns, robr, nlitim, nuribl ebls austry,
a stioml oritb of sy pence. All deeds, lean, or rontrada for tM ew, ev , or other
bwfu of my Wd b • rednebpmeet project a1Wl rontain u M subject to the nondiaerimistkn or
rowtnption elves Ixrea[ter prsaibed.
(Amended by $bb.1976, a 689. p. 1667, f 2)
t !7176. Pam of naeWaalndnllen awd nonagrepdon e6vas
Exprw proYbiwu dub M hwluded In dl deeds, lean ud rontneb whkh w agency pevpaw b
inter kb with rsDaet b tM oak, kaaq aubksa, trwfu, uu, occupancy, moan, or enjoyment of
sy Imd b • radeYebpmut projert in aubafnetialy w folbwm[ fom:
(.) to deed. m. followi~ bm8uap ehnu appnt~"Ifie tranW ha.b nrsanb by and fu
howl! n hemlf hk a Fa hehe, saevton, admbktraton, and wi8rr, aM W pawn d.imbt
aedu or t t LMro, tTut Lben atoll he vv d'sedmhurbn aBdwL or uenptloo of, n7 gnoo u
[map of perew p aeeom7 of roan molar, need, nlieke, ee; muiW abtn, ntlaW orl8b, a
avmtry b w cola, kw, nbins, trwfer, un, auupauy, brew, a mjoyment of N. pnmYs
haalu tnyeyed, not ahaB the 7pnmw , ~ ~ a ny ppeerwe ddmbf vvder or throvth Aim or ha,
stab8ah a permk my eah Dnwtiro a praetirna et dbimbation oe ae{nptkv wiN nfere~. [o
tha wkctbn, bstbq numMr, w a onopanry of twnb, laws, aabbpnb, avbkwen, a
Yaedw in Wa prinks haw enygN. 116 (ontwt eoYaunb ahdl rm wiN eM bvd"
NI In Noon tlu (olbadn8 kntvap alrq aDDeae~"1Le kaw hn+in ewssb M aM fu himal[
a ne hi a Mr ton, nambn, adminkhatan, and wits, and dl penaa chiming under nr
a~W Nis !coact mda and awapted vpm and wbjea b tlu tolbwbt eondifks:
'111aL rLen rhali M w d'IaatmlMflaa aawat n aYmwaLLv, n/ mY rwa„n nY ..n„n M,r.rn.w ...
account of rua, slur, ersd, eaiigf7v, sex, tmeibl alibi, sfked origin, ar aoortrj, k tM Nukgr
avbinainb Gwferdni, w, oceapaney, tenon, a enjoymnt of tM premYw brew kaaed trot
ahdl tM kaaaa hkrelf, s m7 Denon dalmby uoMr u throoffh Aim ar hs• sbblrh or prmit my
sash peectiee a Pradies of dYaimkafion ar sgrapfkn wiN refem:s b the uketis, hwation,
number, w, a oaupaecy, of bsab, laaeaaa. wbWaer, avbtenob, or YenMee b dw pnmYs
herein trued."
Id Iv rovbub mhYd bb by tAe agency nbtlng b tM uk, froufu, m kaeme of Imd ar my
btemt theroin erquind by tM apvcy whhb sy aunty ew a reMniopmant Drojed fM
finetwg PnrYku b au6atut48y rite [sma st forth a1W1 b Included and' ' 'the mnttub
ahdl furthee proride flat tM lontobg proriaks ahdl M bkdkg vpoe end ahdl 0-6118ab tM
eantnefing Putt' or parlin end eny eubwntractinH part! or partka, or otMr frwfenn under Ibe
inatnment.
(Amended by Sbb.1976, c. 689, p. 1657, D 7; 9bb,Ip81, a 111, p. 2687, d E10.)
I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
Date: July 5, 1989
~ c~Cnn+o,~
~ ~.
o~Q o
F! U I2
J'~_>
isn I
To: Mnyor, Members of City Council, and City ~~~~~ai//g~r
From: Joa Schultz, Community Services Manager ~i~D'
By: Dave Leonard, Park Proj act Coordinator J
Subject: Approval to Award and Execute Professional
Service Agreement for Park Construction
Administration and Inspection Services.
City Council authorize award end execution of a Profeeeional
Service Agreement with BSI Consultants, Znc. to provide Park
Construction Administration and Inspection 6ervicas for a sum
not to exceed $96,000.00 to be funded lroID Park Development
Fund No. 20-4532-8006, 8007, 8015 and 8611.
To aesura compliance with the plane and epacificatione
3o et.. eg f.. ewe ~.. ..t.. ^f ^1. - - -
Park and Beryl/Lions Tennis.COUrt Improvements,•'a ~coneultant
for contract inspection services is required.
Proposals were received from four Consultant Firms to provide
daily inspection services Eor the prof acts. Based on
analysis of the proposals and interviews with the prospective
inspectors, it is recommended that the firm B.S.I.
Consultant, inc. provide the services.
Resp~eyPUl l,~ted,
Joe ~SChuitz ~~
community Serv~ Manager
JS:DL:ba
~P
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Thl• Agreement is made and entered into this 5th
day of July , 19g~, between the City o! Rancho
Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as
"CITY") and _ H.S.I. Consultants Znc
(hereinafter referred to ae "CONSULTANT^).
A. Recitals
(i) CITY has heretofore issued its Request for
Proposal pertaining to the performance of professional services
with respect to the preparation of Park Construction
Adminiatrat ion and Znsoection Services.
("Projact^ hereafter).
(11) CONSULTANT has nos submitted its proposal for the
performance of such services.
(111) CITY desires !o retain CONSULTANT to perform
proieuional services necusary to render advice and auistance
to CITY, CITY'• Planning Commission, City Council and staff in
the preparation of Project.
(iv) CONSVLTANT represents that iC Ss qualified to
~•+'*^~'!". ey^-~ c_r:•ica~ ar,G 1. "iiiing to perform such professional
services a^ hereinafter defined.
NOW, 1'!ffiREFORE, it i• agreed by and between CITX and
CONSULTANT a• lolloar.
H. Aoreemant.
1. Uelinitiones The following detlnitions shall apply
to the tolloainq terms, except where the context of this
Agreement othsraise requires:
(a) Project• The preparation o! E4Lk
Construction Administration and Inscection services.
described in Exhibit "A" Scope o! 9erviees hereto including, but
not limited to, the preparation of maps, surveys, reports, and
documents, the presentation, both oral and in writing, of such
plans, maps, surveys, reports and documents to CITY as required
~~
1
and attendance at any and all work sessions, public hearings and
other mutinge conducted by CITY with respect to the project as
outlined in the Scope of Services.
(b) The Council: Shall mean the City Council
o! the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Council is the governing
body of the City.
(c) The Director: Shall mean the Director of
community Services for the city o! Rancho Cucamonga, authorized
by the Council to represent the City in matters pertaining to the
Project.
(d) Services: Such professional services as
ors necessary to be parlormed by CCNSVLTANT in order to complete
the project.
(e) ~omnletion of Project: The date of
completion o! all phases of the project, including any and all
procedures, development plans, maps, surveys, plan documents,
technical reports, meetings, oral presentations and attendance by
coxSVLTANT at public hearings Yegardlnq the project acceptance
for construction is set forth in Exhibit "S" Project Schedule
attached hereto. '
.. 7~'u LSi~iir aarNe e^ LO110Me:
(e) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and
complete the project in accordance with Exhibit "A" and
applicable with Federal, StaG and CITY statutes, nqulatlons,
ordinances and quidelinee, all to the reasonable satislaction of
CZTY.
(b) CONSULTANT shall supply copies of all maps,
surveys, reports, plans and documents (hereinafter collectively
referred to a• "documents") including all supplemental technical
doovments, as described Sn Exhibit "A" to CITY within the time
epecilied in Frojact Schedule, Exhibit ^H". Copies o! 4he
documents shall be in such numbers ss are required by Exhibit
"A". CITY may thereafter review and forward to CONSULTANT
comments regarding naid documents end CONSULTANT shall thereafter
make each revisions to said documents as are deemed necessary.
CITY shall receive revised documents in such Lora and
~~
2
in the quantities determined necessary by CITY. The time limits
set forth pursuant to this Section B2.(b) may be extended upon a
written approval of CITY.
(c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT'• sol• cost
and expense, secure and hire ouch other persona es may, in the
opinion of CONSVLTANT, be necnsary to comply with the terms of
this Agreement. In the event any each other persons are retained
by CONSULTANT, CONBIILTANS hereby warrants that such persona shall
be Tully qualified to perform services required hereunder.
CONSULTANT Lurther agrees that no subcontractor s'.all be retained
by coNSVLTANT except upon the prior written approval of CITY.
~, CiTY aarese as follows:
(a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximum sum o!
S96,oo0.00 for the performance of the services required
hereunder. This sum shall cover the coat of all start time and
all other direct and indirect costa or lees, including the work
of employees, consultants and subcontrnctors to CONSULTANT.
Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made in accordance with
the schedule eat forth in Exhibit "C".
(b) Payments to CONBSlI,TANT ,shall be aade by
CITY in accordance Mlth the 1nvM n.. .._+._SttC3 .~.} Cv2:uuZ,ii,i~T, on
a monthly basis, and each invoices shall be paid within a
reasonable time alter said invoices are received by CITY. All
charges shall be detailed in Exhibit "C" either with respect to
hourly rates or lump sum, asounts for individual tasks. In no
avant, however, will said invoices exceed 9St of individual task
totals described in Exhibits "A" and "C".
(c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event, shall
CITY ba required to pay to CONSULTANT nny sum in excess o! 95i of
the maximum payable hereunder prior to receipt by CITY of all
final documents, together with all supplomsntal technical
documents, a• described herein aceeptabl• in loan and content to
CITY. Final payment shell be made not later than 60 days after
presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY.
~~
3
(d) Additional services: Payments for
additional services requested, Sn writing, by CITY, and not
included in the Scope of Services as eat forth in Exhibit "A^
hereof, shall ba paid on a reimbursement basis in accordenee with
the !u schedule sat forth Sn Exhibit ^C". Charges Lor
additional sarvicam shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and
shall ba paid by CITY within a reasonable time altar said
invoices are rnceived by CSTY.
4. CITY_aaream to orovide o cONCrt*-•w~.
(a) Information and assistanee as east forth in
Exhibit ^A" hereto.
(b) Photographically reproducible copies of
maps and other information, it available, which CONSULTANT
considers necessary in order to complete the project.
(c) such information am is generally available
trop CITY files applicable to the project,
(d) Assistance, 1! necessary, in obtaining
information from other governmental agencies and/or private
parties. However, it shall be CONSULTANT'• rsaponmibility to
make all initial contact with respect to the-'gathering of much
information.
5. Ownership of ne .+ ~^• All documents, data,
studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports
prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be
considered the property of CITY and, upon payment !or services
performed by CONBULTANT, sucb documents and other identified
materials shall be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT,
may however, sake and retain ouch copies o! said documents and
materials as CON3IILTANT may desire.
Any use or rnuae of the plans and epeciiicationa
except at the efts intended or any alteration or rwimion o! the
plans or specifications by the CITY, its stet! or authorized
agents without the specific written consent of the CON9ULTANT
shall be at the sole rink of the CITY. The CITY
r vJ
agrees to hold harmlesr and indemnify the CONSULTANT agalnet all
damages, claims and losses including defense costs arising out of
any such alteration or revision, or use or reuse at another site
by the CITY, its etatt or authorized agents.
6. Termination: This agreement may be terminated by
CITY upon the giving of a written "Notice o! Termination" to
CONSULTANT at least !1lteen (1S) days prior to the date of
termination specified in said Notice. In the event this
Agreement Ss ao terminated, CONSULTANT shall be compensated at
CONSULTANT'S applicable hourly rates as set forth in Exhibit "c",
on a prorate basis with respect to the percentage oL the project
completed as of the date o! termination. In no event, however,
shall CONSULTANT receive more then the maximum specified in
paragraph 7 (a), above. CONSULTANT shall provide to CITY any and
all documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, mope, models,
photographs and reports, whether Sn drelt or tinal fors, prepared
by CONSULTANT as of date of Grslnation. CONSULTANT may not
terminate this Agreement except for cause.
7. Notices and Designated Reoresentativee: Any and
all notices, demands, invoices and written communications between
the parties hereto shall be ader•...A .. -_! tcrtY
• ii• Li•ia
paragraph 7. The below named individuals, turthermore, shall be
those parsons primarily responsible for the performance by the
parties under this Agreement: Mr. Gary Beke~ Director
Construction 3ervicea, BSS Consultants, Inc. 16880 W. Bernardo
Drive. Suite 100. San Diegg. CA 97127 (6191 451-6100. Mr. Dave
Leonard. Park Porlecta Coordinator. City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O.
Box 807. Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91779 f71d1 989-1858.
Any such notices, demands, invoices and written communications,
by mail, shell be deemed to have been received by the addresses
forty-eight (48) hours after deposit thereot in tho United States
mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as set forth above.
8. ~~uranee: coNSULTANT shell neither commence
work under this Agreement until it has obtained all Snsursnce
required hereunder in a compsny or aoapanies aeeeptsble to CITY
nor shell CONSULTANT allow any subcontractor to commence work on
a subcontract until all insurLa~nce required o! the
1~
5
subcontractor has been obtained. CONSULTANT shall tale out and
maintain at all times during the term of thi• Agreement the
following policies of insurance:
(a) Workar~a comnenaet~~~ nsv anc Belore
beginning work, CDNSULTANT shall lurnish to CITY a certificate of
insurance as proof that it has taken out Lull workara~
compensation insurance for all parsons whoa it may employ
directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work
specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of
calilornia.
In accordance with the provisions of California Labor
Code Section 7700, every employer shall secure the payment oL
compensation to his employees. CONSULTANT prior to commencing
work, shall •iqn and file with CITY a certllicstion as follows:
^I em ewers o! the provisions of Section 3700 of the
Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against
liability for workers compensation or to undertake eel! inaurance
in accordance with the provisions of that Cade, and I will comply
with ouch provisions belore commencing the performance o! the
work of this Agreement". -
/1N A.A11.. •,~t,.,r
Throughout the term of this Agreement, nt CONSULTANT~• sol• coat
and expense, CONSULTANT shall keep, or cause to be kept, in lull
force and •ttect, Eor the mutual benelit of CITY and CONSULTANT,
comprehensive, broad loan, general public liability and
automobile inaurance against elaima and liab111ties !or personal
injury, death, or property damage arising lrom CONSULTANT'e
activities, providing protection o! a least One Million Dollars
(1,006,000.00) for bodily injury or death to any one person or
Lor any one accident or occurrence and at least one Million
Dollars {1,~i00,000.00) !or property damage.
(c) Errors end Omissions: CONSULTANT shell
take out and maintain at all times during the life o! this
Agreement, a policy or policies of insurance concerning errors
and omissions ("malpractice") providing protection o! at least
Szso.ooo.oo tar errors and omissions ("malpractice")
~~
6
with respect to loss arising Pros actions o! c.~NSULTANT
partorminq anginaaring urvicas haraundar on behalf of oITX.
(d) General Insurance Rewiremanta: All
insurance required by express provision of this Agregant shall
ba carried only Sn respons ibis insurance companies licensed to do
business in the State o! California and policies required under
paragraphs e.(e) and (b) shall name as additional insureds CITY,
its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents. A11
policies shall contain language, to the extant obtainable, to the
effect that (1) tba insurer waives the right o! subrogation
against CITY and CITY'^ elecbd officials, officers, gployaes,
and agants; (2) the policies era primary and noncontributing with
any insurance that may be serried by CITY; and (3) they cannot be
cancelled or materially changed except altar thirty (30) days'
notice by the insurer to CITY by certified msil. CONSULTANT
shall furnish CITY with copies o! ell such policies prosptly upon
receipt of thq, or certificate evidencing the insurance.
CONSULTANT may effect for its ovn account insurance not required
under th1• Agraqent.
9. Indemniticetion: CONSULTANT ,~ shell defend,
indemnity and save harmleq CITY. itw wi.c±•fl ~-~ ~ppoi:a.~
officials, officers, agants end gployeee, from all liability
from loss, damage or injury to parsons oz property, including the
payment by CONSULTANT of any and all legal costa and attorneys'
lees, in any manner arising out of any negligent or intentional
or willful acts or gisrlons of the CONSULTANT in the performance
o! this Agreement, including, but not limited to, all
consequential damages, to the maximum extant permitted by law.
10. Aesigpaant: No assignment o! this
Agreement or of any pert or obligation o! parlormence haraundar
shall be made, either In whole or in part, by CONSULTANR without
the prior written consent o! CITY.
11. Indeoendent contractor: The parties hereto
agree that CONSULTANT and its employers, officers and agants era
independent contractors under this Agreement and shall not ba
construed for any purpose to be gploysas of CITY.
~~
7
12. Governing Law: This Agreement shall 6e
governed by and eonatrued in accordance with the laws of the
State of California.
13. ~tornw'a Faae: In the avant nny legal
proeeedinq i• instituted to enforce eny tarn or provision of the
Agreement, the prevailing party in acid legal proceeding shall be
entitled to recover attorneys' Lan and costs from the opposing
party in an amount determined by the Court to be reasonable.
14. $ntire Agreement: This Agreement
supersedes any and all other ngreemants, either oral or in
writing, between the parties with respeet to the subject matter
herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no
representation by any party which is not embodied harem nor any
other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this
Agreement shall be valid and binding. Any modification at this
Agreement shall be •ftaotive only if it is in writing signed by
all parties.
IN WITNESS WNEREOF, the parties hereto have executed
this Agreement as of the day and yeer first set lorth above:
cONSVLTANT - B.S.I. Consultants, Ins.
Date:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Dates
Dennis L. Stout, Mayor
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL
Joe Schultz
community Services Manager
DaL:
ATTEST:
Apporved as to form
Beverly A. AutheUt, City Clerk~O City Attorney
8
EXNIBI7 A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The consultant shall provide construction administration
inspection services as outlined in the contract administration
procedures Imcal Proorama Manual as published by the California
Department of Transportation. Contract inspector will consult as
Asaistent P,esident Engineer !or the project. Duties will include
but not limited to:
A. Provide construction inspection of all improvements shown
on Clty approved plans and apacification Lor Old Town Park,
Aer~l/Clone moditicatione and West Beryl Park. Examples of
improvements to be expected are:
1. Storm Drain Construction
2. Sanitary Sewer construction
7. Street and Parking Lot Construction
4. Perk Construction
a. Site Gradlnq
b. Landscape and Irrigation Construction
c. Restrooa Building/Shade Structure Construction
d. Concrete improvements including flat and wall
construction.
•. Electrical installation o! lighted fields,
courts and security lighting.
L. VariOLLa other raj aleA /f.w.
S. Provide day-today coordination and liaison with the
contractor(s), City Project Manager, Clty Huildinq and
Engineering Departments, Dtllity Companies, Surveyor,
Materials Teetinq Laboreeories and other Individuals and
Agencies involved in the project.
C. Provide contract administration services to include the
Locals Proorama Manuel and the following:
Provide daily inspection report o! men and
equipment hours, where and amount o! work being
partormed, coordination o! work anA potential
changes or problems, prograse towards completion o!
work according to the contract requirements,
conversations with all parties related to the
completion of the project, and any other
information fleemad essential to assure compliance
with the contract requiroenta.
Provide weekly statement of working days. Monitor
contract progress to assure completion of project
within allotted construction days. Advise and
assist in notification of contractor should
progress not be •atistaetory.
S/
3. Prepare contract change orders utilizing City forms
and procedures.
4. Prapara daily reports to document all extra work
performed on a time and material bases.
s. Review and certify quantities of work completed !or
progress payments.
6. Review and maintain tiles of contractor~e wage and
employment records and reports as required with the
Cal Trans Local Programs Manual.
7. Coordinate survey and material tasting services as
provided by City consultant and assure that
required advance notice is provided and eha
services are provided at the approprinte time.
D. Perform required inspections to assure improvements are
constructed per the plans and speciflcatione and the
workmanship is of the highest quality.
E. Maintain records to reflsct the as-constructed condition
and assure contractor records era kept currant and accurate
as to the as-constructed condition.
F. Perform final inspection and make recommendation for
acceptance of the improvements to the City.
c. Prepare or assist City in all nacessaFy final reports,
notices or completion, etc.
:+. ?rovida sepsrate reporting and accounting for each projeot
inspected.
Reimbursement for services rendered shall be made thirty (~o)
days with final payment being made within 60 days after
completion of services !or each individual project. Payment for
services will be at the hourly and lump sum rates specified in
exhibit "C". No travel, secretarial, principal engineer,
supervisory, etc. time will be paid !oz unless specilically
requested by the City Project Manager. Notice for a construction
project's start date will be given at least 11 days in advance.
Failure to respond with services will recall Sn the termination
o! this conernct.
S~
Si
SCOPE OF WORK
CONSTRUCTION .°+OgfINISf'RATION AND INSPECITON SERVICES
SCOPE
Listed belay is a brief descriptlon of the numerou dutiu that comprise a dally BSI
contract administrariat~mtpection routine; tasks generally undertaken include, but ate not
necessarity limited to the following:
• Familiarization and review of wnttas documemt.
Participation in Prewnsttuctioa Meetingi.
• Review of Compliance Certificate.
Daily impesion and Preparation of Dally Ltspection Reports.
Review and recotamemdatiom in the ptxeuing of payment requuts.
Assistance and recommendation is the processing of Change Orden, if required.
• Preparation of periodic Project Status Report.
Coordination with Contractor, Ageary staff etc.
• Coardinaton with Materials Laboratory stet[ for material tdtiag as outlined in the
specifications.
• Other Construction Phate Service, as mey devebp, to determine that the work it
proceeding im general camplianu with the intent of the pkun and specificatloas.
The following represent a more detailed process of the normal xquetta of event
involved t~ dally administratloa/mtpection activitla that wBl be uttlitxd oa thif project:
Review Plans and Specifications
Attend meetingi and conferences as required.
• Review submittals es required and discuss with Contras Senior Inspector/Agenry
Contras Manager.
• Ensure that proper noti6carian to resident has occurred and that eca6ic wntrol
requirement are setlsfied at all times.
~~
iii
Meet with Contractor at the beginning of each day and review proposed work plan,
including specific details that may affeM the progress.
• Record information related to Contractors work crews and performance, equipment
at site, eu
Coordutate schedules and testing a, required, including sampling, if necessary and
review of test raults.
Make notes and approve quantities and develop pay estimates as required and
submit to Engineer for approval.
• Review actual Contractor performance throughout day, as required, and discusses
discrepancies as they occur.
Develop 'Punch IJst" items.
• Review items requiring corrective action with Contractor and submit final acceptance
report, when wrtectiom have been made.
• Serve as general liaison between Contractor and Agency,
• Report to Agency/BSI Project EngineeNManagei at completion of each day's work
• PrcDeIe and submit darly and wenYly oimmw.o :n.n.rr:,.......,....
Coordinate on-going construction surveys and staking as requred.
Obviousty, marry other specific issues are dealt with on a daily basis, which are not listed
above. An important aspect, however, of the HSI approach to Contract intpection is the
internal quality wntroUasstuance provided our clienp. Each inspector or group of
inspector is supervised directly by a Registered Professioml F.oghaear and Supervising
Senior Inspector, which ensures our etienb of direct handson review and assistance in the
delivery of a quality product Supervising Engineezs are quite familiar with the impaction
and eesring needs of each specific project and avadabk to provide each inspector with the
necessary support at arty time.
With regard to our typical quality control program, h should bo emphasisxd that quality
control is very important both internally and externally.
~~
iv
Speaking in terms of the erternal issues and using a typical street companoon projen as
an example, the following items represent the minimum acxprbk: [or proper control of
a project where BSI is asked to provide guidance to the City.
Observation and testing of subgrade companion
2 Observation and testing of concrete work, (curb and gutttt/sidewalk,
underground utilities, etc.).
3. Obutvation and testing of base materials, including:
• Sampling and Testing
• Gradation
• Sand Equivalent
• R-Va]ue
• Companion and Thickness Detetmimtiom
4. Obutvation and testing of placement of asphalt concrete. (BSI, through the
use o[ our company awned nuclear gage, is capable of providing en inspenor
in dual capadry [inspenion and companion testing] for mntrol of paving
projects.)
Process should include dat7y sampling and testing for.
Gradation
.vNud~ ..G~itcui
Maximum dCNfly/96 Voids IDnr
Stabdiry
Relative Companion
Batch Plant impenion, as required.
5. Miscellaoeom impenion anti relocation o[ uttL'tles, etc-
As mentioned previomly, internal quality control measures emote that projects are directly
supervised by Registered Engineer, with considerable experience in the inspection and
testing of comtrvnion mareriah. A seperau Internal Qm6ty Coaaol System has been
established within BS[ to amore that the necessary degree of quality is met for each
projen in which the comparry is imohTd
in serving the needs of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, BSI wtll provide the City with an
experienced team of Comtrnnion Adtttitdsttation/Inspection petwme4 In an effort to
minimize cmb to the City, we will place very experienced impenor oa each assignment
capable of handling not only inspection resptmstbdides, but certain upects of construction
administration as well.
Sal
v
Depending oa the date of tommmeemem of work, are have prervided fax rerkw resumes
tot four (4) inspectors than eve prapae for use oa the rehcenced project, Farb itnpeetor
has extensive esperieaa is all facets of pttbfie trorks ramauctioa. Addy, awe
provide at ao esrra clurge to the City, roudae sapertrbina sad liaism through o~ Semor
Supervisia8 , Mr. Steve Symonds.
As an additional ante, BSI persoaoel tgpically ponraa the letert tdtm equipment
available ittelttdiag paging ratio (each iaspecmr) aDd ~, ~~ vehi~ complete with
the forest Motorola radio egt>;pmeat, melttdhtg a salluhr telephone eapabt7ity. Should dte
CrtY a'~h, BSI petaomel as he set up m opeeue ~ the Cttyrs rttdio frequenry if it is
considered by the City advaatagemrsv to da sa
BSI penoaael arc alto egmpped with aR neasssry field equipment, speci8eatiom sad
standards as well as other toateriah iegtd[ed for dally aedvidea.
The primary inspector assigned to the project shall be John H.
McCullough. Reassignment o£ the project inspector shall rea_uire
City acceptnace and approval of a substitute inspector.
LIMITATION OF LL1B1L.11Y
BSI agrees to indemnify and hold harmless AGENCY, its officers and tmplnyees
from and against liability, damages, costs, IOSSes, claims and expenses, including reasonable
attomevs' fees. atisina out of the ne_vlieent acts. errors ~r nm;e<irm. of nCt ~~ .ti.
performance of this Agreement.
AGENCY and BSI have discussed their risks, rewards and benefits of the
project and the HSPs total fee for services. The risks have been allocated such that the
AGENCY agrees that to the fullest extent permitted by law, BSI's total liability [o
AGENCY for any and all injuries, claims, losses, expenses, damages, or claim expenses
arising out of this agrcemeat from any cause or cataes, shell not exceed the total amount
of this contract. Such causes include but are not limited to BSI's negligence, errors.
omissions, strict liability, breach of contract or breach of warranty.
BSi shall not be responsible for delay, nor shall BSI be responst~lt fqr damagts
or be in default or deemed to be in default try reason of stokes, lockauu, accidents, or acts
of Gud, or the failure of AGENCY to furnish timely informatlon or to approve or
disapprove BSI'S work promptly, or delay or faelty performance by AGENCY, other
contractors, or governmental agencies, or any other delays beyond BSCS contrnl.
~~
~;
8ffiBIT H
PROJECT 8C8EDQLB
B5I CONSULTANTS, INC. commits to pertozminq the servlees listed
in the Scope o! Work in an energetic, consistent end diligent
manner upon recelPt of a ^NOtice to Proceed" from the Agsncy.
Ws expect to jointly establish with the Agency stet! a schedule
for the project at the outset and w will commit the resources
necessary to maintain the schedule.
Preliminary Estimate start up dates for the projects are:
PROJECT CONTRACT
DURATION ESTIN7ITED
START DATE
Old Town Park 120 Days July 13, 1989
Beryl/Lions Park 120 Days August 28, 1989
West Beryl Park 120 Deys October 23, 1989
The work as set forth in Exhibit "A" shall coaence with the
preconstruction meeting for the project and shall be completed
with the city Council acceptance of the construction project.
EXHIBIT C
SC»ULE OF FEES
Estimated feu for construction adtninistratiaNinspecdon personnel aze established on a
very flexible bazis. Currentty our inspector aze invoiced at rotes ranging from 547.00 to
559.00 per hour depending on a City's specific needs. Theo rates reprexnt our standazd
feu and are subject to reductioNnegotiation deprnding on the duration and/or nature of
each contract.
In an effort to demonstrate BSI inspection capab0ities to the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
we propose to provide construction inspector to the City at a rate of 54&00 per hour.
Please find listed below our proposed, not to exceed costs for this project based on an
assumed schedule as indicated below:
FEE SCHEDULE
Schedule of Fees
The following estimated cosu have been developed for review and further discussion and
are baud an the scope of urvices outlined in the Request for Proposals (RFP) and an
assumed range of required inspector time of 1,500 to 2,500 hour (all three projects).
For estimating purposes, we have shown the inspector assigned 'to the project for
approximately g hour per day (adrttinistration and iaspection).•'Any departure from this
schedule will result in a carresnnndino ~,.~.,,..... a.......:., r__. .„ -
......... .... ,G.-.~CLS ,.iu uc
invoiced on a time and materials not to exceed basis. (Ne '~irdmum charges).
Task Descriotion Estimated Fees
A. Construction Administration and Inspection j,~W ~~
Construction Lrspeaor, S 72,000.00 S 120,000.00
Assume Overall Average of 8 Houn Per
Day @ S48/hour (1,500 - 2,500 hour)
Project Supervision N/C N/C
Materials Testing Provided by the City
TOTAL ESTIMATED FEES ~[-Q~ S 72.000.00 S 120.OIIO.Iq
The total not to exceed fees listed above ale baud on the estimated work plan and time
requirements listed herein. Should additional services be required to atxompUsh project
objectives, said services will be imroiced in accordance with the Usted unit rates, following
prior notification and approval by the Agenry,
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIAONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 5, 1989 i.>r
70: CTty Council and City Manager ~~C
FROM: Russell H. Msguire, C1ty Engineer
BY: Michael D. Long, Sr. Pub11c Works Inspector
SUBJECT: Execute contract for the Hillside Road, east of Henaosa
Avenue, awarded to J. E. G. Construction for the aaounL of
=95,100.00 (186,404.87 plus lOf contingencyy) Lo be funded
frog Fund 09, bas Tax 2107 Account No. 09-4637-8813 (FY
89/90) -Awarded 6-7-89
RECOI~EIOATION:
It is recoeew!nded that City Council authorize the Mayor and C1ty Clerk to
execute the contract docuexnts for the Hillside Road, east of Herepsa
Avenue, and authorize the Adstlnlstratlve Services Directi r to
expend 195,100, (186,404.87 plus 10 f contingency) to be funded frae Fund
09, Gas Tax 2107 Account No. 09-4837-8813.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
On June 7, 1989, Ctty Council awarded the sub,)ect protect to J. E. G.
- - -tea JA ~wwsi w..:] w..1 ~.~A Hu u_ u~utul rnMnvf AnrirMa hnnAe
and insurance docuaw:nts; reviewed then and-found Chest to be caeglete and
in accordance with the contract proposal.
Resp ~ u~ tted,
RHM:MDL:
cc: Purchasing
~9
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 5, 1989 ~~
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Michael D. Long, Senior Public works Inspector *y,,q
SUBJECT: Execute contract for the Feron Boulevard Improvement
Protect from Ramona Avenue Lo Herwosa Avenue awarded to
Laird Construction for the amount of 576,811.00 (869,828.60
plus lOS contingency) to be funded from Community
Development Block Brant Funds, Account No. 28-4333-8194
(FY 88/89) (Awarded June 21, 1989)
It is recomaended that City Council sutlarize the Mayor and C1ty Clerk to
execute the contract documents for the Feron Boulevard, from Ramona
Avenue to Hengsa Avenue Improvement Protect, and authorize the
Administrative Services Director to expend ST6,811.00, (f69,828.60 plus
lOS contingency) to be funded from Community Development Block Grant
Fundt, Account No. 28-4333-8194.
aacxground/Malysi s
On June 21, 1989, City Council awarded the subject project to Laird
Construction. Staff has received the executed contract documents, bonds
and insurance documents; reviewed them and found them t0 be complete and
in accordance with the contract proposal.
ResDe ubmltted, ^
('
RNM:MDL 3Jmr'_
cc: Purchasing
Q
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 5, I989'
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Michael D. Long, Senior Public Works Inspector Jam'
SUBJECT: Execute contract for the Sierra Madre and Placida
Court Irgrovearent Protect located (rata Arrow Highway to Yia
Carr111o Drive, awarded to Heritage Construction for the
amount of (180,742.00 (f164,311.00 plus lOf contingency) to
be funded with Caaaunity Developaent Block Grant Funds,
Account No. 28-4333-8811 (Awarded June 7, 1989)
1t is recowrended that C1ty Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to
execute the contract docuarents for the Sierra Madre and Placida Court
Irprovearent Protect and authorize the AdNnlstrattve Services Dl rector
to expend (180,742.50, (f164,311.00 plus lOf contingenty) to be funded
with CoawrnltY Developaent Block Grant Funds, Account No. 28-4333-8811.
BackgrouM/Analysts
On June 7, 1989, C1tY Council awarded the sublets protect G~ Heritage
Construction. Staff has received the executed contract docuarer;ts, bonds
and insurance docu~ents; reviewed there and found theta to be coaglete arrd
1n accordance with the contract proposal.
Respe rbral ted,
:MDL:
cc: Purchasing
~~
- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 5, 1989 L>M
T0: City Council and Ctty Manager ~-~C
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Michael D. Long, Senior Public Norks Inspector
SUBJECT: Execute contract for the Scurry Seal Progran 1988/89, Phase
1 Various Street locations awarded to Doug Martin
Contracting Coo~appany for the aaxwnt of
f134,524.00 (f 131,385.01 plus l0f contingency) to be funded
froe Gas Tax 2107 Account No. 09-4637-8816 (FY 88/89) and
the aaaunt of (84,253.00 (76,593.86 plus lOf) to be funded
fro~a Gas Tax 2107 (New Account) (FY 89/90) Awarded June 7,
1989
RECOMMENCJITIOM:
It 15 recoawended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to
execute the contract documents for the Slurry Seal Progran 1988/89, Phase
i Yartous Street locations Improvement Project, and authorize the
Administrative Services Otrector to expend 5134,524.00, (f 131,385.01 plus
lOS contlrgenry) to be funded from Gas Tax 2107 Account No. 09-4837-8816
and the ,mount of (84,253.00 ((76,593.86 plus IOf contingency) to be
fY11UiY fI VM Wi TYn ~i.~i7 \u.Vw ~.y ~. u::nt)•
Background/Malysls
On June 7, 1989, City Council awarded the subject project to Doug Martin
Contracting Company. Staff has received the executed contraet documents,
bonds and insurance documents; reviewed them and found them to be
complete and to accordance with the contract proposal.
Resp yf Htted,
RHM:MO
cc: Purchasing
l.S/ ~t
.cw ~ •.
v r. ! O'
- !y j~ O
D
~ 2 :_'~
tL.''~d
:;;_
L
~y -
i_
' ~~ -~
.'_ ~,
~,
,~
~,~'~
~. ,.
cu
r a~. I
~- ~.
SLURRY SEAL
1988-8
~3
VICINITY S INpEX MAP
~'
e+aa+nt
- ~ L
Y
a
~i
r
r
r
.,~,
~, .
A
~~me'r~ 3
r ~~ ,
6 =
r<r:
CITYOFRANCHO Cl1GgMaNQA " $ TITLE
SLURRY SCAL PHAS[ I ~ SITC MAP
1988 N
LEGEND
C~ nue~r ~~~ DISTRICT N0. ! - A
b FML NTOMNT
• ~vreoziwT~ wurwN w ~ s ~ nrcNiNo
],
~~u~J
ICMA DRIVE
LEGEND DISTRICT NO• t-H
Q SLURRY.SEAL
tl PIRH NYORANT
• APPRO%IMATE LOCATION OF R B R PATCIIINO
" CITYOFRANCHOCUGQfYION "'° TInE
' '•
~~-~~~~ aiunnr sa~~ Pnuea~~r ~ SITE MA
X0.8 .e9 1~T
,,;.
~~
@GENO ioorHic~ e~vR
t~ swnnr scA~ r
b FlR[ RrpRART piSTRICT N0. 2 - A
_ _ AMRpKIIrAit lAUrpR M R d R nrewwR
~.'1~ I~~R~I~CU~`~a~l NIS (TITLE
SLURRY SEAL PHASE I I /~ (SITE MAP
19A8 1V
~P ~p
LEQ
n
CITYOFRANCHO
SLURRY SEAL PHASE I
1988
uu~~r u~~ DISTRICT N0.2-B
nec Mro~u~r
uroaura~, I Marron OI ~ s w Mn11Nli ---
r
TItLE
//~ SITE ILL
N
~P I
J ~ J ~ I l
~S+7iar /b+v
1
/LfO~'tiL
LEGEND
p aws~r a~~~ DISTRICT NO. 3
b -IIIL NTg1ANT
_ _ _ -'. ~rrnmrutc iouriaN a ~ s w roreNaw
~8
J
crVpe.~
~ ,-- --
J
m
a
N
m
r
i
0
s
0
L~
w
v
s
a
I
I
HERM08A AVENUE I
Ir
DISTRICT N0. 4
LE^GEND
`. SLURRY SEAL
d FIRE HYDRANT
CITYOFRANCHAG "' TITLE
SLURRY SEAL PHASE 1 SITE MAF
.988 N
nn I/^
W
W
2
W
Q r
O
J
Q
m
2
V
Q
4
r
~I~t o~rr N(1 R
LEGEND '
C~ ~ SLURRY SEAL
O FIRE NYORANT
• APPRO%INATE LOCATION OF R B R PATCHING
.~ `.L~~nA•yy,~nrr~~~ N S TITLE
f ~w~w"w/
3 SLURRY SEAL PHASE I $ITE MAP
,,:, ~ .9 8 8 N
~~
~JTRYLON J
W
h_
S
~J L
E E f
I7
w
W
~
?
K
O
J
Q
2
V
4'
~ - ocnngRD~NO ROAD ~~
I:
DISTRICT N0. 6
LEtiEND ~~
Q SLURRY SEAL ',
b FIRE NYORANT
~_
• APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF R 0 R PATCNIN6
~_
CITYOFRlWCFIO C TITLE
f
a SLURRY SEAL PHASE i SITE NINPt
e ~ 198g N I
inn
7 / -
I
nrmv nv. n •wrnvn n>'rn ~ unur
STAFF REPORT ~~ ~.~
~ A
J $ a
Date: July 5, 1989 ~y~~ ~~
To: Mayor, Membare of City Council, and City ~anaag/er
From: Joe Schultz, Community Services Manager /~
By: Dave Leonard, Park Project Coordinator _Iq'
Subject: Approval to Execute Contract with Martin J.
Jaska, Inc. for Construction of Old Town Park
Improvements.
City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clark to execute
the contract documents for the Old Town Park Improvements and
authorize the Administrative Sarvicea Director to expand
$1,002,299.00 ($911,181.00 plus 103 contingency) to 6a funded
from Park Development Pond No. 20-4532-8611 and Community
Block Grant Fund No. 28-6532-8181.
..,. _„
- -- ..1, :, .., - - - - - the Gl~ Tc:::.
Park yImprovements prof acts to~MartinyJ. Jaska,yInc. Steft has
received the executed contract documents, bonds end insurance
documents and Pound them to be complete and in accordance
with the contract proposal.
Res fully submitted,
Jo Schultz
Community Servac s Manager
JS:DL:bs
7~-
n•sr ~~
RNOW ALL HEN HY THESE PRESENTS: That the following agreement
is made and entered into, in triplicatn, as of the date executed
by the City Clerk and the Mayor, by and between Martln J. Jaeka
Inc, hereinafter referred to as the "CONTRACTOR" and the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California hereinafter referred to as "CITY".
WRERF.AS, pursuant to Notice inviting Sealed aids or Proposals,
bids were received, publicly opened, and declared on the date
specified in said notice; and
WREREA.4, City did accept the bid of Contractor Martin J.
Jaska. Inc.; and
WHERS718, City has authorized the City Clerk and Mayor to enter
into a written contract with Contractor for furnishing labor,
equipment, and material for the construction of OLD TOWN PARR
IMPROVEMENTS, a FEDERAL HLOCE GRANT PROJECT.
NOW, TBffi28POR8, in consideration of the mutual covenants
herein contained, it is agreed:
1. GENERAL SCOPE OF WOpR; Contractor shall lurnish all
necessary labor, tools, materials, appliances, and equipment for
and do the work for the Old TONN PARR IMPROVEMENTS. Said work to
be performed in accordance with epeclficationa anfl standards on
file in the office of the City Engineer and in accordance with
bid prices hereinafter mentioned and in accordanc• with the
instruction of the City Engineer.
2. INCORPORiTFO DOCVMENT3 TO B*+ ID FD COMP x'hnNT u]: The
aforesaid specifications are incorporated herein by reference
thereto and made a part hereof with like force and effect as if
all of said documents ware set forth in full herein. Said
documents, the Resolution Inviting Bids attached hereto, together
with this written agreement, shall constitute the contract
between the parties. The contract ie Sntended to require a
complete and Llniehed piece of work and anythlnq necessary to
complete the work properly and in accordance with the law and
lawful governmental regulations shall be performed by the
Contractor whether set out specifically in the contract or not.
should it be ascertained that any inconsistency exists between
the aforesaid documents and this wrlttan agreement, the
provisions of this written agreement shall control.
3. TERMS OF CONTRACT•
A. The undersigned bidder egress to execute the contract
within ten (lo) worklnq days from the date of notice of award of
the contract or upon notica by City after the 30 woxking days,
and to complete his portion of the work within One Hundred Twenty
(120) working days and to maintain the improvements for ninety
(90) calendar days niter completion of the work starting from the
data specified in the Notice to Proceed.
73 F-1
The bidder agrees further to the asaeeament of
liquidated damages in the amount of TWO HUNDRED FIFTY ($250.00)
DOLLARS dollars for each calendar dey the work romaine incomplete
beyond the expiration of the completion data. City may deduct
the amount thereof from any monies due or thet may become due the
Contractor under this contract. Progress payments made after the
scheduled date of completion shall not constitute a waiver of
liquidated damages.
4. INSURANCE the Contractor shall not commence work under
this contract until he hoe obtained all insurance required
hereunder in a company or companlea acceptable to City nor shall
the Contractor allow any subcontractor to commence work on his
subcontract until all Snmurance required of the subcontractor has
been obtained. The Contractor shell take out and maintain at all
times during the life o! this contract the following policies of
insurance:
Companeation Inmuranco: Before beginning work, the
Contractor shall tarnish to the Engineer a certiticato of
insurance ea proo! that he has taken out full compensation
insurance for all parsons whom he may employ directly or
through subcontractors in carrying out the work specified
herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of
California. Such insurance shall be maintained !n full
force and ettect during the period covered by this
contract.
In accordance with the provisions of Section 3700 0! the
Calitornie Labor Code, every contractor ~ehell wears the
DaVment of rtmm~~maH nn •_ i.~~ --..~_..__-
to commencing work, shall •iqn and+ fil• with ~the~City ~a
csrtiticetion as follows:
"T am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 0! the Labor
coda which require every employer to bo insured against
liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self
insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code,
and I will comply with such provisions before commencing
the performance of the work of thi^ contract."
b. For all operation o! the Contractor or any subcontractor
in performing the work provided for herein, insurance with
the following minimum liaits end coverage:
(1) Public Liability - Bodily Injury (not auto)
5500,000 each persona $1,000,000 each accident.
(2) Public Liability - Property Damage (not auto)
$250,000 each accident; $500,000 aggregate
(7) Contractor'• Protective - Bodily Injury
$500,000 each person; $1,000,000 each accident.
(4) Contractor's Protective - Property Damage
$250,000 each nccidentf $500,000 eggrsgete.
F-2 ~1
(51 Automobile - Bodily Injury
f500,000 each person; (1,000,000 each accident.
(61 Automobile -Property Damage
5250,000 each accident.
c. Each such policy of insurance provided for in paragraph b. shall:
(1) De issued by an insurance company approved in writing by City,
which is qualified to do business fn tM State of California;
(2) Name as additional insured tM C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga, its
elected officials, officers, agents and ewployees, and any
other parties specified 1n the bid documents to be so
included;
(3) Specify it acts as primary insurance and that no insurance
held or owned by tM designated additional insureds shall be
called upon to cover a loss under said policy;
(3) Contain a clause substantially in tM following words:
"lt is Mreby understood and agreed tMt this policy may not be
cancelled rror tM amount of LM coverage thereof reduced until
thirty (30) days after roceipt by C1ty of a written notice of such
cancellation or reduction of ceverage as evidenced by receipt of a
registered letter.'
(5) Otherwise be 1n fona satisfactory to Ciry.
d. TM policy of Insurance provided for in subparagraph a. shall
contain an endorsement which:
(1) Naives all right of subrogation agalnat all persons and entitles
specified to subparagraph 4. c.{2) hereof to be listed as additional
insureds in CM policy of insurance provided for to paragraph D. by
reason of any claim arising out of or connected with tM operations
of Contractor or any subcontractor 1n performing tM work provided
for herein;
(21 Provides 1t shall not be cancelled or altered wlthouL thirty (30)
days' written notice thereof given to City by registerod mall.
e. The Contractor shall at the L1me of tM execution of LM contract
presenE tM original policies of insurance required in paragraphs a.
and b. Mreof, or present a certificate of the insurance company,
showing she issuance of such insurance, and tM additional insureds and
other provisions required Mre1n.
F-3
~~
5. PREVAILING MI16E: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the
provisions o a orn a Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1
and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing
rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in
which the public work is perfonaed, and not less than the general prova111ng
rate of per diem wages far holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the
Dl rector of Lhe Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California
is required to and has deteradned such general prevailing rates of per dtw
wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the
office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line,
Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested
party on request. City also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be
posted at the ,lob site.
The Contractor shalt forfeit, as penalty Lo C1ty, twenty-five dollars
(f25.00) for each taborer, workman, or mechanic ewployed for each calendar day
or portion thereof, 1f such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid lest than
the general preva111ng rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done
under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontracWr under h1m, in
violation of the provisions of said Labor Code.
6. APPRENiiCESH1P EMPLOYMENi: In accordance with the provisions of
Section 1 o a r o as amended by CMpter 971, Statutes of 1939,
and in accordance with the regulations of the Callfornla Apprenticeship
Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of
the work.
Attention is directed to the provisions 1n Section 1777.5 and 1777.6 of
the Labor Code concerning the eaipioyment of apprentices Dy the Contractor or
any subcontractor under h1m.
Section i7ii.S, as amenaea, requires the Contractor or subcontractor
employing tradesmen in any apprcntlceaDle occupation to apply to the ,joint
apprenticeship coinlttee nearest the site of the public works project and
which adainisters the apprenticeship program in that trade fora certificate
of approval. The certificate will also f1x the ratio of apprentices to
,journeymen that will be used 1n the perfonsance of the contract. The ratio of
apprentices to ,journeymen in such roses shall not be less than one to five
except:
a. Nhen unemployment to the area of coverage by the ,joint
apprenticeship canwlttee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in
the 90 days prior to the request for artiftcate, or
b. When the number of apprentices to training 1n the area exceeds a
ratio of one to five, ar
c. Nhen the trade can show that 1t js roplaeing at least 1/30 of its
membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis
statewide or lowlty, or
F-4
7(p
d. Mhen the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered
apprentices on ail of h1s contracts on an annual average of not
less than one apprentice to eight Journeymen.
The Contractor is rcqutrod to hake contributions to funds estaDltshed for
the adainistration of apprenticeship programs 1f he employs registered
apprentices or Journeymen Tn any apprentlceable trade on such contracts and if
other contractors an the public works site are making such contributions.
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the
requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 1n the employment of apprentices.
7. LEGAL NOURS OF MORK: Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a
legal day s wor or a wor employed in the execution of this contract,
and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be
governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working
hours set forth /n Oivlston 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code
of the State of California as amended.
The Contractor sM11 forfeit, as a penalty to L1ty, twenty-five dollars
(525.00) for each laborer, workman, ar mechanic employed 1n the execution of
Lhe contract, by h1^ or any subcontractor under h1m, upon any of the work
hercinbefare mentioned, Por each calendar day during which sold laborer,
workman, or mechanic 1s required or permitted to labor more Lhan eight (8)
hours Tn violation of said Labor Code.
8. TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE PAY: Contractor agrees t0 pay travel and
subsistence pay eac wor n needed to execute the work required by this
contract as such travel and subsistence payments an defined in the applicable
collective bargaining agreements f11ed 1n accordance with Labor Code Section
1773.8.
9. CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY: The C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga and its elected
officials, o cers, agen an employees shall not be answerable or
accountable 1n any manner for eny loss or dame9a that may happen to the work
or any part thereof, or for any of the materials or other things used or
employed in performing the work; or for 1nJury or damage to any person or
persons, either workwn, dsployees of the Contractor or his subcontractors or
the puD11c, or for damage Lo adJolning or other property from aay cause
whatsoever arising out of or 1n connection with tM perforiaance of the vrork.
The Contractor shell Da responsible for any damage or inJury to any person or
property resulting from defects or obstructions or from eny cause whatsoever,
except the sole negligence or willful misconduct of L1q~, its employees,
servants, or Independent contractors who are directly rosponslble to City
during the progress of the work or at any L1me before its completion and final
acceptance.
F-5
The Contractor will indemnify City and its elected officials, officer,
agents and employees against and will hold and save them hornless from any and
all actions, claims, damages to persons or property, penalties, obligations,
or liabilities that may be asserted or claimed by any person, fine, entity,
corporation, political subdivision, or other organization arising out of or in
connection with the work, operation, or activities of the Contractor, his
agents, employees, subcontractors, or invitees provided for herein, whether ar
not there is concurrent passive or active negligence on the part of City, Its
elected officials, officers, agents and employees, but excluding such actions.
claims, damages to persons or property, pena11t1es, obligations, or
liabilities arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of City,
its employees, servants, or independent contractors who are directly
responsible to City, and to connection therewith:
a. The Contractor will defend any action or actions flied in
connection with any of sold claims, damages, penalties,
obligations, or liab111ties and will pay all costs and expenses,
including attorney's fees incurred 1n conrection therewith.
b. The Contractor will promptly pay any ,judgment rendered against the
Contractor of Ctty, or its elected officials, officers, agents or
employees, covering such claims, damages, penalties, obligations
and 11ab111ties arising out of or in connection with such work,
operations, or activities of the Contractor hereunder, and the
Contractor agrees to save and hold the setae harmless therefrom.
c. In Lhe event City, without fault, is made a party to any action or
protteding flied or pprosecuted against the Contrattor for damages
or other claims arising out of or to connection with the work,
operation, or activities of the Contractor hereunder, the
Contractor aerces to oav to City any anA all caste anA orn~neee
Incurred by Ctty in such action or proceeding together with
reasonable attorneys' fees.
So much of the money due to the Contractor under and by virtue of the
contract as shall be considered necessary by City may be retained by City
until disposition has been made of such actions or claims for damage as
aforesaid.
10. NON-DISCRIMINATION: No discrimination s~iall 6e made in the
employmen~ersors upon publtt works because o1 the race, color, or
religion of such persons, and every contractor :•,r public works violating this
section is subject to all the penalties imposed fora violation of Division 2,
Part 7, Chapter 1 of the Labor Code in accordance with the provisions of
Section 1735 of said Code.
11. CDNTMCT PRICE AND PAYMEIR: City shall pay to the Contractor for
furnishing a ma era an ng proscrlbad work the unit prices set
forth in accordance with Contractor's Proposal dated MAY 24, 1989.
F-6
~g
12. ATTORNEYS' FEES: In the event that any action or proceeding is
brought byy e~to enforce any tern or provision of this Agreement,
the prevailing party shall recover its reasonable attorneys' fees and costs
incurred with respect thereto.
IN YITIESS YNEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be
duly executed with all the forasllties required by law on the respective dates
set forth opposite their signatures.
State of California
Contractor's License No. icw204675B ~A
MARTIN J. JASKA INC•
10723 Bell Court
RancY.o Cucau~onoa, CA 19730
June 28,1989
a \
e
Vice President
CITY OF RANg10 gICAMONGII, CA
BY:
e
ae
Contractor's Business Fhone 714-941-1500
Emergency 7hone at which Con vac r can e
reached at any tl me 714-687-2948
F-7
~9
RESOLUTION N0. 89-160
P. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS ANO
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "OLD TOWN PARK IMPROVEMENTS" ON
FERON BOULEVARD, NEST OF NERMOSA AVENUE IN SAID CITY AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO
RECEIVE BIDS
WHEREAS, it is the fntention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to
construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
WHEREAS, the CSty of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and
specifications for the construction of certain improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby resolve that the plans and specifications presented by the City of
Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications
far "Did Town Park Improvements, a Federal Commmnity Block Grant Project".
BE Ii FURTHER RESOLVER that the City Clerk is authorized and directed
to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids ar proposals
for doing the work spacifted in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which
said advertiseemnt shalt be substantially 1n the following cards and figures.
to Mit:
"NOTICE INVITING SEALED BiDS OR PROPOSALS"
PUr'SUanL to a Remlm inn .! tbC wii6.:ii ui Lhe L1ty Of RanC hO
Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directingy this notice, NOTICE IS
HEREBY GIVEN thet the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office
of the City Clerk to the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before
the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.N. on Wednesday, the 24th day of May, 1989, sealed
bids or proposals for the "Old Town Park Improvements, a Federal Community
Block Grant Protect" in said City.
Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of
the City Clark. 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of
Old Town Park Improvements".
MININUN WAGES: Notice is hereby given that the project to which the
construction work covered by this Notice Inviting Bids is befog assisted by
the united States of Aaerita and Federal Lobar Standards and Provisions are
included in the contract pursuant to the provisions applicable to such Federal
Assistance.
All laborers and mechanics eaployed or working upon the site of the
work will be paid unconditlonatly and not tess often than once a week, and
without subsequent deduction or re'oate on any account (except such payroll
deductions as are penaltUd by regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor
~~
Resolution No. 89-160
Page 5
~~ r1
Dennis tout, layor
ATTEST:
, ~
every ut a et, ty , erk
I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Raneho Cucaapnga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution Mas duly passed,
approved, and adopted by the City GouncTl of the City of Rancho Cucaagnga,
California, at a regular ueeting of said Ctty Couneil held on the 19th day of
April, 1989.
Executed this 20th day of April, 1989 at Rancho Cucaapnga,
California.
~,
y L e et, ty ark
~I
- CITY OF RANCHO CiJCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 5, 1989
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director
BY: Joan A. Kruse, Administrative Assistant
SUBJECT: TELECOMMUNICATION CONSULTANT AGREEMENT
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve a contract with TeieQu estions
Inc, a telecommunica tfon consulting firm, for negotiation, agreement
development, and purchase of a telephone system and voice and data cabling for
the Civic Center and public Safety Facility, including oversight and
installation of same, through system acceptance.
BACKGROUND: In order to provide the most efficient pu6lfc service for voice
and data communications for the present staffing requirements as well as antra
departmental communication (Fire District. Sheriff, outlying City facilities)
staff determined it would be necessary for a new telephone system to be
acquired. The firm, Telepuest ions Inc, was selected to write a specification
for a telephone system, and voice and data cabling, to provide for necessary
expansion. The specification was written to assure the elimTna4ion of
blocking that occurs with our present system l~naoi lily to get an internal or
outside line without a busy signal), and the '.atest technology to enable us to
utilize voice and data capability to its greatest extent.
Attached for your consideration is an agreement with TeleQuesti ons lnc in the
amount of $15,000,(One-half of which will be funded by RDA account 13-51000
and one-half from account 01-4245-3900) which will secure for the City the
best equipment at the most economical cost, system design, installation
oversight, and system acceptance after installation. Funds have been budgeted
in Lhe City's '88-'89 and '89-'90 budgets.
Re spe tfully~~~--s~~ub///matted,
~~
Jim Hart
Administrative Services Director
JH:JAK;jk
Attach.
~~
A6REE11ENT
This Agreement is made and entered into this 5th day of July, 1989,
between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter
known as "CITY") and Tele Questions, Inc. (hereinafter known as "CONSULTANT").
A. Recitals.
(i) CITY has heretofore expressed its intent to contract for
professional services with respect to the negotiation and purchase agreement
for a telephone switch and associated cabling and Lhe cabling for data and
video equipment resulting from the request for proposal process conducted by
consultant, those services to be performed according to exhibit "A" attached
and by this reference made a part hereof.
(ii) CONSULTANT has heretofore submitted its proposal for the
performance of such services, a full, true and correct copy of which proposal
is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and by this reference made a part hereof.
(iii) LITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform services
necessary to accomplish the tasks outlined in scope of work through successful
installation and operation of said equipment post cutover.
(iv) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perform such
services and is willing to perform such services as hereinafter defined.
NON, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between LITY and CONSULTANT as
follows:
B. ree~ent.
1. Definition: The following definition shall apply Lo the following
term, except where the context of this Agreement otherwise requires:
(a) Services. The completion of those telephone and telephone
related requirements and data and video cabling requirements described in
Exhibit "A" hereto.
2. CONSULTANT ogre es as follows:
(a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith perform the services in accordance
with Exhibit "A" hereto and all in accordance with Federal, State, and CITY
statutes, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable
satisfaction of CI TT.
4. CITY anrao5 ac follows;
(a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximum sum of E15,000, This sum shall
cover the cost of all staff time and all other direct and indirect costs or
fees, including the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors to
CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY shall be made in accordance with
the schedule set forth below.
(b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY in accordance
~3
with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, and such invoices shall be paid
within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. All
charges shall be in accordance with CONSULTANT'S proposal either with respect
to hourly rates or lump sum amounts for individual tasks. In no event,
however, will said invoices exceed 95% of individual tusk totals described in
exhibit "A".
(c) Ad ditior,al services: Payments for additional services
requested, in writing, by CITY shall 6e paid on a reimbursement basis in
accordance with the fee schedule set forth in paragraph 3(b), above. Charges
for additional services shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid
by CITY within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY.
4. CITY aorees to provide to CONSULTANT
(a) Information and assistance as set forth in Exhibit "A"
hereto.
5. Termination: This Agreement may 6e terminated by CITY upon the
giving of a written "Notice of Termination" to CONSULTANT at least fifteen
(15) days prior to the date of termination specified in said Notice.
CONSULTANT may not terminate this agreement except for cause.
6. Notices and Designated Representatives: Any and all notices,
demands, invoices and written communications between the parties hereto shall
be addressed as set forth in this paragraph. The Administrative Services
Director and Administrative Assistant shall be primarily responsible for the
performance by the parties under this Agreement. Any such notices, demands,
invoices and written communica?ions, by mail, shall 6e deemed to have been
received by the addressee forty eight (48) hours after deposit thereof in the
Ilnirnd SrahaC me il. nn ata ge ora paid and oro pe rlv addressed as set forth above.
7. Assignment: No assignment of this Agreement or of any part or
obligation of performance hereunder shall be made, either in whole or in part,
6y CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY.
8. independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that CONSULTANT is
an independent contractor under this Agreement and shall not be construed for
any purpose to be an employee of LITY.
9. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed 6y and construed in
ac to rdance with laws of the State of California.
10, Attorney's Fees: In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to
enforce any term or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing party in said
legal proreed+'^.^, span n> eor;rled ro rernvcr atin rneys' fees and costs from
the opposing party in an amount determined by the Court to De reasonable.
11. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any and all other
a 9reements, either oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to the
subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no
representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other
agreement, statement, or promise not contained in Lhis Agreement shall be
valid or binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only
I
if it is in writing and signed by all parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement
as of the day and year first set forth above:
CONSULTANT CITY
Address
~~
EXHIBIT •A•
SCOPE Of NORK:
1. Consultant shall negotiate on behalf of City of Rancho Cucamonga for
switch, data cabling, voice cabling, video cabling, broadband
backbone and related hardware and software associated with
telecommunication equipment.
2. Consultant shalt verify equipment order with vendor to assure
completeness and accuracy.
3. Consultant shall attend customer meetings and provide critical input
for switchroom layout and design.
4. Consultant shall attend vendor inte rvfews with departments to assure
requirements within system design are met.
5. Consultant shall review database, floor plans, and worksheets for
completeness and accuracy.
fi. Consultant shall monitor installation of all ca tiling for compliance
with specification.
7. Consultant shall monitor switch power up, station wiring, telco
testing, station device installation, database testing, and sT to walk
th rnunh
8. Consultant shall verify installation for completeness prior to
acceptance and post cut-over.
~~
r. ~:~ ;
- .._ „„; .
~'~"~*"~'"'Ms. Joan Kruse
~• Administrative Assistant
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 Baseline Road
~;v .. Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730
~~Y:'T "~`~`
-.~,,; ~` _. , Dear MS. Kruse,
April 14, 1989
We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to present the
attached Qroposal for consideration, on continuing our
- telecommunication consulting services.
Z:
„iur;:.~. ..
`, ~~ our proposal will outline the services needed to oversee the
project until 30 days after implementation of all equipment,
wire and cable plant.
~~>: ;-~^~•~ ~ Although this project was significantly expanded beyond the
3';~,
~~<., ~. ~, projected liPespan, we have continued to provide the °~ ~.
'="'~`~r expertise required and at all times kept the best interest
~. of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Ej,t'~y.
wo r,clieva vnu will scree. that TeleQuestions has
'~.'{~~ ~ demonstrated its expertise, professionalism and hard work, ~~
;
-°,:=~v. while assisting you in the selection process Por a '. ..,
.:_~:a' ' ~ voice/data PBX and identifying data communication
"'~`~- requirements.
We take great pride in working, growing, and providing a
continuing service to our local business community and the
_ City of Rancho Cucamonga for the long haul.
We sincerely appreciate having had the opportunity to serve
you.
Sincerely,
<.,~
Margaret Krumm
Senior Manager
•~
1
i "'i. •
a. ?.
7201 Archibald Ave., Suile 4-305 • Post Olllce Box 7000-305 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 • 714/9876099
We are a completely unbiased Telecommunication Consulting
Firm. We do not accept any fees from manufacturers ,
distributors, or dealers.
We believe our alients~ investment in our expertise entitle
them to any and all benefits. Any fees offered are passed
on to the client and documented during contract
negotiations.
VV
Tcic ~~~.ti~~~~.
o „w
Because most organizations are not intimately aware of a_i of the
conditions presently affecting the telecommunications industry,
or the potential vendors it almost always becomes a lot of
guesswork in system selection, procurement, and implementation.
Unfortunately, in too many cases, the vendors are placed in
charge to provide, all the important considerations that are
necessary for successful system implementation and operation.
Remember, vendors are in business to sell hardware and software.
Considerable savings can be realized for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga by further investment in our expertise. The savings
will far exceed our professional fee cost, and will assure the
city to successfully complete the process o£ implementing their
telecommunications requirements for the new Civic Center.
The benefits and savings are numerous but some major ones are:
* avoid costly misunflerstandings by the definitions
of important terms.
* reduce the risk o£ being "taken for a ride".
* eliminate any uneccessery charges
mnn ,.,nio Awn wire distribution is sionif icant and should be
supervised from planning stage, delivery, installation,
implementation, anfl testing.
I would strongly encourage the City of Rancho Cucamonga to
continue our services to protect an investment of this magnitude.
8~
7201 Archinald Ave., Suile 4-305 + Post Ollice Bo><7000305 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91>01 • 714/9878099
~clc ~icsti~~~~s
~~ ~w
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
PHASE ~l
CONTRACT NEGOTIATION/PURCHASE AGREEMENT
* design of equipment
* additional interviews
* maintenance agreement
* equipment upgrade costs
* capacity/features
* system configuration
* title of system
* trade-in
* default and damages
* cancellation by the Buyer before installation
* cancellation by the Seller before completion
* leasing arrangements
* consultant discounts
* best and final offer
* payment schedules
PHASE X2
INSTALLATION/IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES
;hitiAtw All necessary olanninq meetings
es*_abliah delivery date
overview oP Ploor plans
overview of equipment room specifications
Telco/GTE information
after hours security provision
oversee floor plans
oversee station locations
oversee contingencies for system delays
obtain system documentations
follow up and evaluation
obtain documentation of any changes
v
7201 Archibaltl Ave., Smte 4305 • Post O1hce Boy 7000305 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 • 714/907.6099
Tclc ~~ccti~~~~~
~~;
PHASE M3
OVERSEE:
spe
SYSTEM CUT-OVER/POST CUT-OVER
equipment and software configurations and
cifications
station assignment and user training
delivery and installation
distribution and cable plant
equipment room preparation
hardware, software, and trunk testing
system cut-over
testing and acceptance
OVERSEE: 30 DAY POST CUT-OVER
* changes to database
* additional training
Assure all maintenance procedures are in place
Review and verify as-built drawings and records
9i
7201 Archibaltl Ave., Suile 4-305 • Poaf Olfice Box 7000-305 • Rancbo Cucamonga, CA 91701 • 714/987.8099
Tcl~ ~~~.t~~~~~.
_-
TeleQuestions Research, Analysis, and Design activities for the
City of Rancho Cucamonga will be organized as follows:
As per attached Exhibit A
TeleQuestions will provide the services explained in Exhibit A
for a fixed fee of $15,000
This fee includes all consultant and design engineer time, sup-
port materials, computer time, secretarial services and other re-
lated office expenses we will incur on this project,
Payment Terrs
Payments will be made in accordance with the following schedule:
Completion of Phase 1 $5,000.00
Completion of Phase 2 $5,000.00
+ Completion of Phase 3 $5,000.00
* Phase 3 will be considered complete 30 days after
implementation of system.
I~nhinnAl PAVxlent TQrmR
TeleQuestions will provide these services as per Exhibit A for a
professional fee of $50.00 per hour and will invoice The City of
Rnncho Cucamonga monthly and will provide a ledger of hours used
with explanation.
TeleQuestions Inc.
Signature
Tit a Date
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
S gna ure
Tit a Date
~~
7201 Archibald Ava., Suite 4305 • Post Ollice Box 7000-305 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 • 714/987.6099
- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 5, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: James T. Harris, Associate Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Approvai of a one year extension of existing Traffic Signal
Maintenance (C.0. 87-086) with the adjustment of monthly
service cost with Computer Service Company. To be funded
free Gas Tax, Account No. 09-4637-6028, Contract Services
(FY 89/90)
pECONEIOATIOM:
Approvai of one year extension of the Traffic Signal Maintenance Contract
(C.0. 87-086) with a 5i ad,~ustwent of the monthly service cost for
traffic signal maintenance, as requested by Computer Service Company.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The City is currently completing a two year Traffic Signal Maintenance
Contract. A request has been received fray Computer Service Company, the
City's current traffic signal maintenance contractor. This company has
grnvtdaA an adequate level of service at cgmpetitlve rates. Computer
§ervtce Company was requested to submit a proDOSaI for extending the
current contract through Fiscal Year 89!90. Computer Service Company is
agreeable to maintaining the current level of service with a 5s
adiustment to the monthly service charge per signal and no increase in
wage rates. A copy of the proposal is attached for your information. An
annual negotiation of fee rates is provided for 1n the current
maintenance agreement.
The following is a listing comparing existing and proposed rates:
Current ProDOSed
Monthly Intersection Service f52.50 f55.13
Hourly Wage Rates
Standard/Overtime Standard/Overtime
Operations Superintendent 27.30 40.95 Same Same
Englnnering Technician 26.78 40.17 Same Same
Leadman 26.78 40.11 Same Same
Service Technician 25.83 38.75 Same Same
Lab Technician 21.00 31.50 Same Same
93 __
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TRAFFIC S[BNAL M1IINTENANCE
JULY 5, 1989
PARE 2
Current Proposed
Equipment Rates
Service Truck 12.60 Sane
Bucket truck 32.55 Same
Air Compressor 22,58 Same
The 5S increase to the monthly service charge per signal, along with new
signals coming into service w111 be within the proposed fiscal year 89/90
budget of 5100,000.00 Por traffic signal maintenance contract services.
Respec lly submitted,
/1
~! ,
Attachment
9~
RECD ,®
Multi ib ~_.,~
CITY Oi IGNCiq CUCANCNDI
EkCbIFFaIMC OlY8k1Y
COMPUTER SERVICE CpMPANY DIVISION
I3J0 ER ST ORYNG[LH JgPC AVI NU[, CV LII qiO N.CP g34]I~SJIV
V OST O`fICE EOY dIB O. fVLL[RLO N, CA 93G]1
<RCd <OOE x]111 gHON! AA1~0361
June 9. 1989
CSty of Rmcho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rnneho Cucamonga, Celifornla 91730
Attention: Paul Rougeav
Dear Paul:
In Referents Refer To:
CSC LTR No. 8906DD0242
Per discussion with J!m Narrie June 2, 1989r Dleese find
enclosed requested proposed rate changes for traffic signal
maSntenancs for the upeoaming fiscal year. Pleas• not• th•
only increaa• Ss Sn th• monthly routine maSntenance category.
The price dlffersnc• reflects the CPI Sndex change for the
peat year.
if you hav any questions regarding this matter, please do not
heattate to call.
Ver/y~ truly yours,
iennta Dteter
C(.MPUTER SERYIC6 COMPANY
DD ]dr
enc.
cc: JSm Rarrla {,~
Jeff Swanson
~~
PROPOSED RATB CHANGES POR TRAFFIC SIGNAL NAZNTENANCB
Monthly Intersection Service 555.13
Standard Overtime
operations Superintendent 527.30 540.95
Engineering Techaicien 26.78 40.17
Lsedun 26.78 40.17
Service Teohuloien 25.83 38.75
Leb Techniciea 21.00 31.50
Service Truck 12.60
Bucket Truck 32.55
Air Cospressor 22.58
9~
nrmv no o w win vn r, rn . ""nvr .
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 5, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Bob M. Porter, Assistant Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of a one year extension of existing Street
Striping Contract (C.0. 87-07) and the addustxnt of three
price schedule categories, with Orange County Striping
Service, Inc. To be funded fray Gas Tax, Account No.
09-4637-6028, Contract Services (FY 89/90)
AECOMNETDATIOM:
Approval of one year extension of Street Striping Contract (C.0. 87-07)
with the adJustxnt of three price schedule categories as requested by
Orange County Striping Service, Inc.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Currently the Ctty is completing a two year Street Striping Contract with
Orange County Striping Service, Inc. This coapany has provided very good
service, 1n a tixly inner and at very competitive prices. In light of
the favorable service, Orange County Striping was requested to submit a
proposal for extlndln9 the current contract through N scat Year dy/vu.
Of the eighteen pay items, all will be continued at the current contact
price except for a minimal adlustxnt to three items.
The following is a comparison of existing and proposed rates:
1. REFLECTIVE CENTERLINE AND LANE LINES CURRENT PROPOSED
A. 4" Broken Lines 50.029 L/F Same
B. 4" Solid Lines 0.045 L/F Same
C. Two 4" Double Soiid Lines with
4" Black Separation 0.109 L/F Same
D. 8' So11d Lines 0.09 L/F Sax
E. Two-way Left Turn, BotA Sides,
4" lines with 4" Bieck Separation 0,18 L/F Same
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE
JULY 5, 1989
PAGE 2
2. STENCILS - REFLECTIYE CURRENT PROPOSED
A. 8" Letters f3.45 EA. f3.75
d. Limit Bars 12" Wide 0.35 L/F Same
C. Arrows 4.00 EA. Same
D. RRX Complete, Both Sides of Track 84.00 SET 90.00
3. CROSSMALKS -REFLECTIVE
A. 12" Nide f0.33 L/F f0.35
4. PARKING
A. Parking T's f2.00 P/T Same
8. Curb Painting 0.35 L/F Same
5. SMALL STENCILS
A. 3" Non-Reflective Letters f1.00 L/F Same
6. MARK REMOVAL
A. Wet Sandblasting f1.00 S/F Same
7. BLACKOUT 50.20 S/F Same
8. PRE-LINING f0.035 L/F Same
9. REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKINGS f3.00 EA. Same
30. CERAMIC PAVEMENT MARKERS f1.25 EA. Same
In comparison, these Items when applied to the level of service for
Fiscal Year 88/89, would account for a 3.65 increase in re-striping
costs. This is reasonable, when compared to the lnfiatlan rate for the
same period of time.
Respect~y suhmltted,
r. ~
i~ %'
~ ~~ / ~,l -
-'
RHM:BMP:Iy
Attachment
~8
A
~-.
u mNrsannss ucev t~rsn
ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING SERVICE, INC.
783 N. PIXLEY STREET • ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92668
p741 639~d550
RECEIVED
JUN 13 1989
cm aF wldlo cllculollcn
olsuEee~c nmtlox
June H. 19H4
Jim Hat rim
City of Rancho Lucawonga
HL Anneal Hestripe Contract.
Dear aim.
Attache4 are our pr~pused prices for the persod from July t, 1949
thru Junes '>O, 1996. '
We are requesLrn9 only three adjustments From our current price
schedu]r.. H11 three of these proposed increase are in the
Stenciling area. ih is area is more labor inEeneive than the
nttrers, and we he';e trod thr re labor rate increases in the poet
two years, while not ad~ustin9 any prices in our current
con6rac t. All three increases are less than 1D% and.when viewed
aver Lhe two year, of our curt ent contract prices, are less than
vi: a real .
fhe three proposed adjustments are as Fellow+.
2la) &' letters from f3. 49/each to fJ. 7:ri eae L,
2(di HHX complete, from S84. OU/seU to ti9U. U0/set;
3ta1 12" crosswalks, from t. 33/LF to f. 35/LF.
IF ruu have am questions or mould disagree with my request,
pleaeF Co not ha_: to tr to contact ere.
Stepl:cn~J.. He i.~~len
Vice President
I /
ORANGE COUNTV 5TR IPINC SERVICE, INC.
183 N Pitley St., Oranf e, CA 92668
C:o ntractor's Lic. M 346095
f714> 639-4590 FA% f714> 639-6353
PROJEC is Amiual Restr ipinf Contract
Var wus Streets
Proposal For the Period July 1, 1959 to June 30, 1990
ARCHITECT
We hereby submit an estimate for,
UNIT
ITEM GESCRlPTION UNIT PRICE
A. BIG SHEET
1. Reflective Cen terli ne .and Lana Lines
a. 4" Broten Lines L/F .U29
b. 4" Solid Lines L/F .045
c. Two 4" Double Solid Lines
wi to 4" Black Separation L/F .109
d. S" Solid Linr^ L/F .09
e. Two Way Lrpt Turn, botA sidas,
4" Lines with 4" BIacA Separation L/F .1S
2. Stencils - ReP Lctive
_ .,, ~ _..__
Y cA. a. i~
b. Limit
Bars 12" Wide L/F .39
c. Arrows EA. 4.00
d. RRX Complete botb sides op tracts Sets 90.00
3. Crosswalks -_$,aflective
a. 12" Wide I_/F .35
4. Parting
~ a. Parting T's T's 7..00
D. Curb Paintinf L/F .39
5. Smal] Stencils
a. 3" Non-R eplectly• letters EA. 1.00
I ~lO
_. ~ -
uNrr
UNIT PRICE
6. Marking Removal
a. Wet Sandblasting 5/F 1.00
7. blackout S/F .20
8. Pre-Lining LiF .035
9. Reflective Pavement Markings EA. 3. OU
10. Ceramic Pavement Markers EA. 1.25
i
(ol
- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 5, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
8Y: Lucinda E, Hackett, Contract Employee
~~
SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement
Security, Drainage and Maintenance Agreements and Ordering
the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and
Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for
Parcel Map 11891, located on the south side of Arrow Route,
north of the A.T. 8 S.F. Railroad Tracks and west of
Rochester Avenue
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions
approving Parcel Map 11891, accepting the subJect agreements and
security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 and authorizing the
Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreements and to cause said map to
record.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Parcel Map 11891 located south of Arrow Route, northerly of the A.T. a
S.F. Railroad Tracks and easterly of Rochester Avenue was approved by the
Planning Comaission on December 28, 1988, for the division of 131.03
acres into 24 parcels.
The Developer, O'Donnell, Anastrong 6 Partners, is submitting an
agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site
improvements in the following amounts:
Faithful Labor and
eF r~rmance a~eri-al-
Street Improvement f1,162,412 f581,236
Storm Drain 661,972 330,986
Landscape/Underground Utilities 425,556 212,778
( ~ 1
CCSR
PM 11891
JULY 5, 1989
PAGE 2
The Drainage and Maintenance Agreements are required to accept and
maintain the drainage from the north side of Arrow Route through the site
to Jersey Boulevard as shown on the approved plans on file in the City
En9lneer s office.
Copies of the agreements, security, and the Consent and Waiver to
Annexation forty signed by the Developer are on file to the City Clerk's
Office.
Respectfull ubmitted,
~: i C~•
RNM:LE : y
Attachments
(~3
RESOLUTION N0. ~ g- 3 O f
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 11891,
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 11891), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Nap No. 11891, submitted by O'Donnell
Arwstrong b Partners, and consisting of 24 parcels, located on the south side
of Arrow Route, north of the A. T. d S. F. Railroad tracks and west of
Rochester Avenue, beang a division of 131.03 acres Into 24 parcels was
approved by the Planning CoAmlission of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga on
December 28, 1989; and
WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 11891 Ts the final map of the division of
land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map;and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to
approval of the final map by the City Council of Bald City have now been met
by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement
Security by O'Donnell Arwstrong 8 Partners as developer.
NOW, THEREFORE, DE IT RESOLYED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said
Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby
approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said improvement Agreement
on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest: and
that ca1A Parrol Alan wn 11Ra1 Iw ,..~ Lam. CL~ ., .~ `.~ cpprJ~aC a~«. the Ciiy
Engineer 1s authorized to present same to the County Recorder to De filed for
record.
lo~
RESOLUTION N0. JC q. ~ d ~-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMON011, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNE%ATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 AND
STREET LI6NT[NO 1MiNTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR
PARCEL MAP 11891
NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucasonga,
California, has previously forarai a special xwtintenance district pursuant to
the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being DivTSion15,
Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special auintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance
District No. 3, Street L1ggMing Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance
District"); and
NHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping
and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional terriWry to
the Maintenance District; and
NHEREAS, at this tTNe the City Council 1s desirous to take
proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and
NHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed
to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their
written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or
filing of an Engineer's "Report".
NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL aF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLONS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative bogy hereby orders the annexation
of the property as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work prograat areas as
described Tn Exhibit "B' attached hereto to the Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance 01str1ct,
including~Fe Tevy of all assessa~ents, shall be applicable to the territory
annexed hereunder.
' ~~
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6
C/L ARROW ROUTE
ra i
i.tM r
rct x
Q i.iM r
rc~ s
i.w r
rc~ ~
1.«r r
rct s
r.~ r
rCl 7
7.017 r
rc~ s
i•r M,
rCl •
0.711 707
ru is I rep rx I ra n I ra ro I rct a
7A77 iM 4W r 7aY1 r 7.71 r 3.q1 r
ra f t
i. iii r
~I! ra rs
7.1M r
• ra ie
Y~ i•OM r
rCl 17
1.m 777
.~ ,.
ri.m Lei
rc~ r~ rc- xo
~.w r s ~"!
w~~ -~-
i
rc- u I ra xr
~.~ r 1]•r r
ra x•
6117 r
rC1 x~
ri.ar r
711G.E ~UPV04MJDPldi1E rMINT. • ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • STREET MFE MAIi(T.
,o~~ y CPPZ 0! RANCSO C~JCAYOI~GA ~ ~n II8`11
s, ~~. COUMT 0! MN H~l1~tAtDII~I0
'' ` ~'b ~ /'PATrt 0! CAL~'O~NIA
~~
-~ ~ N
EXHIBIT •B•
PROJECT NAME: Parcel Map 11891
N0. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 131.03 ac N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 262.06 units
STREET LIGHTING IMINTENANCE DISTRICT
No. of Lamps to be Annexed
District No. _,~-l£;~1T5DU
1 --- --- 25 --- 4 ---
6 1 2 25 --- --- ---
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
Turf Ground Cover Trees
"u iaLri~L nu. Sireec nave Jq. it. ~q. ft. La.
3 Milliken Avenue/
Median Inland/
Slopes --- 96,360 711
Mtsc. Streets --- --- 551
JAA: 7/5/89
~o~
rrmv nc oenrr un rTrreMnwrr_e _ma+.
STAFF REPORT
,
GATE: July 5, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector'
SUBJECT: Approval of Improvemmnt Agreement Extension for Tract 12832 (Day
Creek Boulevard), located on proposed Oay Creek Boulevard,
between Highland Avenue and Victoria Park Lane, submitted by The
Nilliam Lyon Company
RECOMMEIDIITIOY
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution,
accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND
Improvement Agreeamnt and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction
of the public improvements for Tract 12832 (Dqy Creek Boulevard) were approved
by the City Council on Nay 22, 1986, in the following amounts.
Faithful Performance Bond: f1 ,600,000.00
Labor and Material Bond: S 800,000.00
The developer, Killtam Lyon Company, 1s requesting approval of a 12-month
extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Iaprovement Agreement
Extension are available in Lhe City Clerk's Office.
Respectfull submitted,
RIW: •1
Attachments
log
RESOLUTION N0. g ~- 3O 3
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONSA, CALIFORNIA, APPROYiN6 IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12832 (OAY
CREEK BOULEVARD)
NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an improvement Agreement Extension
executed on duly 5, 1989, by Ni111am Lyon Company as developer, for the
improvement of public right-of-wqy ad3acent to the real property specifically
described therein, and generally located on the Droposed Day Creek Boulevard,
between Highland Avenue and Victoria Dark Lane; and
NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and sub3ect t0 the terms thereof, is to be done 1n
con,lunction with the development of said Tract 12832 (Dyy Creek Boulevard);
and
NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied by good and sufflctent Improvement Security, which is identified
in Bald Improvement Agreement Extension.
NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said
Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
X09
.~~cw'ILLIAVI L1'ON~I~i~¢sz~
85d0 ARCHIBALD, SUITE B. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 (71d) 9B0-P1d4
tune 19,1989
Steve Gilliland
Engineering Department
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga,Ca. 91730
RE: Tract 12832
Dear Steve:
Transmitted herewith is the executed Extension for Improvement
Agreement for Tract 12832 and a check for this extension in the
amount of $251.00.
The William Lyon Company is asking for a 12 month extension for
this improvement agreement. The work related to this improvement
agreement is the completion of Phase II of Day Creek Channel.
.. ,..-,.,.m.. .._. ...... ..,..,.. ~~~, ..
Phase II D of Gay Creek Channel to complete our work on the east
side of Day Creek Boulevard. As soon as this portion of Day
Creek Channel is complete we will begin working on the east
portion of Day Creek Boulevard.
Ptease contact me for any further Snformatiorr we ar. provide to
assist your processing this extension.
Thanks for your help.
Respectfully
~~//~U eI-`'/n'~-
na ri Newman
Prn ir+~t 'da n~gemcnt Assistant
Inland Empire Division
encls.
II
REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT
nrmv no n w unvn nr rn ~ srnwrr w
STAFF REPORT
.~
GATE: July 5, 1989
T0: CTty Council and C1ty Manager
FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer ~
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector'
SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13318,
located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and Manzanita
Drive, submitted by Mayflower - Bayoun
RECOMMENDATION
It 1s recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution,
accepting the sub,~ect agreement extension and security and authorizing the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction
of the public improvements for Tract 13318, were approved by the City Council
on July 7, 1988, in the following amounts.
Faithful Performance Bond: 5136,800.00
Labor and Material Bond: Y 68,400.00
The developer, MAyFlower - Bayoun, is requesting approval of a 6-month
extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement
Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Resp su tted,
.~
'~~~
-" RNM:
Attachments
RESOLUTION N0. 89- ~(rJ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMON6A, CALIFORNIA, APPROYIN6 IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
E%TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13318
NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension
executed on July 5, 1989, by Mayflower - Bayoun as developer, for the
improvement of public right-of-way ad,~acent to the real property specifically
described therein, and generally located on the southeast corner of Heragsa
Avenue and Manzanita Or/ve, and
NNEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
improvement Agreement and subject to the terws thereof, is to be done in
con,~unction with the development of said Tract 13318; and
NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreamnt Extension is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient YmproVement Security, whtrh 1s identifted
to said Improvement Agreement Extension.
NON, THEREFORE, the Ctty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said
Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor Is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvesent Agreement Extension on behalf of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
(~~
dayflower-Bayoun
REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS
FCE~VED
o~r~oa ''-'~:~
June 6th, 1989 FMCIN fq N~~'U~ NOh~
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Community Development Department
Engineering Division
P.O.HOx 807,
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91790
SUBJECT: Request Por Extension of Improvement Agreement TR 33338
Dear Slr:
This Se to kindly request the extension o! the Improvement
Agreement for TR 13318 which exp3ree on July 6, 1989 to Jan.6,
1990.
As of this dat• the the following work remains to be completed:
Minor grading work.
Street improvements.
DrSveway approaches.
Undergrounding o! utilities (scheduled by Edison to aiart the
.4 n{ Tn,.~ 4~M 1
Parts o! the boundary wall.
Landscaping work.
It Ss expected that ell the remainSnq work will be completed well
within the requested extension date of January 6, 1990.
Enclosed please 11nd a completed Dopy of the Improvement Bxtenslon
Agreement, executed Sn tr3p11eate and duly notsrSzed.
Thanking you for your consideration, I remain
Cordially,
MAYFLOWER-BAYOUR ;~-~
//~7 ~~~ll~~
B~ 111 A}ami
V.P./ General Msnager
~I~
~u,~~ Il.wn A~ripu~ ~iitlrl-~n.ILmilin~iu,nnnuu~i.~.A~il7tu•iTld~li.ldU{un
- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 5, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks lnspecto~
SUBJECT: Pyproval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Map
10185, located on the southwest corner of Highland Avenue and
Milliken Avenue, submitted by William Lyon Company
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Lhe City Council ddopt the attached resolution,
accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction
of the public improvements for Parcel Map 10185, were originally approved by
the City Council on April 16, 1981, 1n the following amounts.
Faithful Perfornwnce Bond: 5606,000.00
Labor and Material Bond: (303,000.00
The developer, William Lyon Company, is requesting approval of a 12-month
extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the improvement Agreement
Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Respectfully 1Lted,
RHM: ,. y ~
Attachments
II I
RESOLUTION N0. 8 ~- ~0 5
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CWNCTL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMON6A, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT A6REENENT
E%TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 10185
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for Its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension
executed on July 5, 1989, by William Lyon Conpany as developer, for the
improvement of public right-of-way ad,{acent to the real property specifically
described therein, and generally located on the southwest corner of Highland
Avenue and Milliken Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, descrlbed in said
con,lunction wltr~ntdeveloupme tto~sa d ParceltMap 10185s todbe done in
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which Ts identified
in said Improvement Agreeamnt Extension. '
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California Hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said
Improvement Security be and the sane are hereby approved aM the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
II~
. %~ ~~7LLIA~1 L1-O\ ~~~a~iri7~
BSdO ARCHIBALD. SUITE B. RANCHO Cl1CAMGNGA. CA 91770 Vldl 980-22dd
.Tune 8,1989
Steve Gilliland
Engineering Department
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.0. 80:C 807
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca.91730
RE: Tract 13279 & PM 10185
Transmitted herewith is the executed Extension for Improvement
Agreement for Tract 13279 and Parcel Map 10185 a check in the
amount of $251.00 for each is enclosed.
Our construction staff has informed me that the Detention Basin
is complete and that we will be requesting final inspection and
release of the bonds on this facility immediately. When the
bonds are released we will give the City a maintenace bond if
required.
Extension of the improvement agreement for Victoria Park Lane and
the storm drain system are directly related to the completion of
Phase II A of Day Creek Channel. There is only a small portion
of the storm drain system to complete and that is the portion
that would connect Co Day Creek Channel. Our completion of
'i~Lu~ie Ce~n i.e ur Lu tuc rm lew uuuuueiy ui item i327> is eiau
dependent upon completion of the channel construction.
Both Tract 13279 and Parcel Map 10185 are directly effected by
the detour plan for the work on Highland Avenue. It is my
understanding that this plan should be approved and a permit
issued within the next couple of weeks at which time work would
start immediately.
We are requesting an extension for both tract 13279 and parcel
map 10185 of 18 months. We would like to have your estimate for
completion of Phase IL A of the channel [his could help us in
determining exactly how much time we will need to complete our
projects.
lY ::c can pro•: ide further infarmaticn regarding these improvement
agreement extensions please contact our office.
Respectfully,
~~f!~- r~Mktr/
Shari ;le wRan
Project Management Assistant ~I
Inland Empire Division
REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT
- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
T0:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
July 5, 1989
City Council and City Manager
Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
Steve M. 6111i1and, Public Norks lnspecto~~/s~
Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12650-4
Storm Drain, located on Lhe southwest corner of Canlstel Avenue
and Deer Canyon Drive, submitted by The Deer Creek Company
RECOMIEIOATION
It Ts recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution,
accepting the subject agreement extension antl security and authorizing the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign told agreement.
ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction
of the public improvements far Tract 12650-4 Stores Drain were approved by the
City Council on June 2, 1988, in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond: 5182,000
Labor and Material Bond: S 91,000
The developer, The Deer Creek Company, 1s requesting approval of a 12-month
extension on said lagrovement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement
Extension are available in the C1ty Clerk's Office.
R tf ly su tted,
i /
RHM:
Attachments
ll7
RESOLUTION No. Xq - 3 O w
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CULANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROYIN6 IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12650-4
STORM DRAIN
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extenston
executed on July 5, 1989, by The Deer Creek Canpany as developer, for the
improvenent of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically
described therein, and generally located on the southwest corner of Canistel
Avenue and Deer Canyon Drive; and
11HEREAS, the Installation oP such improvements, described in said
Inyrovement Agreeaw!nt and sub,~ect to the terms thereof, Ts tc be done 1n
con,lunction with the development of said Tract 12650-4 Store Drain: and
MIEREAS, satA iagoveanwi Agreement Ewtcwsfan is Secured and
acconpanied by good and sufficient Iagrovenent Security, which is identified
in said Inprovemen*. Agreement Extension.
NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California Hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said
Inprovenent Security be and the sane are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said ImprovementAg regiment Extension on behalf of
the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga, and the C1ty Cierk to attest thereto.
/~~
STAFF REPORT
._
DATE Juty 5, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspecto~
SUBJECT: O.pproval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13117,
located on the east side of Haven Avenue between Banyan Street
and Chaffey College, submitted by Paragon Haines
RECONIEIOJITION
It is rccammended that the Cfty Council adopt the attached rcsotutlon,
accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
ANALYSIS/BACKGRWND
Improvement Agreement and In~rovement Security W guarantee the construction
of the Dublic improvements for Tract 13117 were origlnaily approved by the
City Council on May 8, 1986, 1n the foliowing amounts.
Faithful Performance Bond: f615,UW
Labor and Material Bond: :308,000
The developer, Paragon Homes, is requesting approval of a 4-month extension on
said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are
available in the City Clerk's Office.
Respp y submitted,
~~
:SMG:
Attachments
I~~
RESOLUTION N0. ~ Q - 30
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITT OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IPPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13117
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Igrovement Agreement Extension
executed on July 5, 1989, by Paragon Hames as developer, for the igrovement
of public right-of-way adiacent to the real property specifically described
therein, and generally located on the east side of Haven Avenue between Banyan
Street and Chaffey College; and
WHEREAS, the lnsta11at1on of such igrovements, described in said
Igrovement Agreement and subject to the teen: thereof, 1s to be done 1n
canlunction with the development of said Tract 13117; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and
accoganied 4Y good and sufficient Iagrovemxnt Security, which is iderrtified
in said Igrovement Agreement Extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, the C1ty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California hereby resolves, that said Igrovement Agreement Extension and said
lgrovement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Igrovement Agreexnt Extension on behalf of
the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga, and the C1fy Clerk to attest thereto.
Iv
~~~t-.sizes, .~iec:
June 2, 1989
Mr. Steve Gilliland
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Ae: ExplraLlon of Improvement Agreement and Securities for
Tract N 13117 - L.O.C 688-5.
Dear Steve:
In response to your letter dated Nay 17, 1989, we hereby lormelly
request an extension of the fiprovament Agreement !or our Tract
N13117 and enclose our check in the amount of 92Sf .00,
Ne are requesting an extension of tour months. The delays Sn the
construction ere dlrsetly reletsd to Lhs changes in policy by the
City of Rancho Cucamonga.
The corrections hsvs commenced and construction continues through
the projected cos:plstion date of October 16, 1989.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
PARAGON NOM$S, INC.
!/Zl1~c.~a~ ~ ~tE~E1VE®
Vanessa Alrkpatr! k .,
.u'; 1?.9
/vk
CITY OF RANCHO gUCAMONDA
enclosure ENGINEERING DIVISN)N
1 ~~
rJJA'rsib ~liirv,~lvn rtK~, ~lanm .!/wwx, C;a{ybnaa ,y04A0 ;~ekr6.{ortr /PlJ/.t9e-rler .Iox/Ere/,t91-~)r
. lGr/uy .,fddr~c.~ ~ 0. ~vs 4ref, Janm..lfonm~ L~j:Snui.9WOi5'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 5, 1989
70: CTfy Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, Citv Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Pubitc Norks InspectorG~
SUBJECT: Approval of Isgrovement Agreement Extension for Tracts 13279
Stoma Drain; 13279 Detention Basin; 13279 Victoria Park Lane;
13279 Streets, located on the south side of Highland Avenue
between Rochester Avenue and N1111ken Avenue, submitted by
N1111am Lyen Company
I{£COIgE1dITiQ1
It is recomanded that the City Council adopt the attached resolution,
accepting the sub,~ect agreement extension and security and authorizing the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND
Ingrovement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the canstructlon
of the public improvements for Tracts 13279 StonK Drain; 13279 Detention
tld51n; ld2/v victoria varK Lane; 1J2/9 streets, were epproVea Dy the G1 TJ'
Council on November 5, 1987, in the following amounts:
Stour Detention Victoria
Drain Basin Park Ln. Streets
Faithful Performance Bond: f2,734,609 (518,575 (155,041 (5,530,041
Labor and Material Bond: f1,367,305 (259,288 f 77,521 (3,139,024
The developer, Nilltam 4yon Company, is requesting approval of a 12-month
extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Iagrovement Agreement
Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Re 11~nsubmitteds
/ : SM
Attachments
/d J
RESOLUTION N0. 8~- 3V
A RESOLUTION OF THE CI7T COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMOM611, CALIFORNIA, APPRDVIN6 IMPROYEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IlRROYEMENi SECURITY FOR TRACTS 13279 STORM
DRAIN; 13279 DETENTION BASIN; 13279 VICTORIA PARK LANE;
13279 STREETS
NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension
executed on December 21, 1988, by Nilltam Lyon Company as developer, for the
improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically
described therein, and generally located on the south side of Highland Rvenue
between Rochester Avenue and Milliken Avenue; and
NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and subject to the tenor thereof, 1s to be done to
conJunctian with the development of said Tracts 13279 Stores Drain; 13279
Detention Basirt; 3279 Yfctbrta Perk tone; 13279 Streets; and
NHEAEAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied 6y good and sufficient ]mprovement Security, which is identified
in said Improvement Agreement Extension.
NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreeaent Extension and said
Improvement Security be and the same an Hereby approved and the Mayor 1s
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behaN of
Lhe city of xancno Cucamonga, and the City Cierx to attest thereto.
/q
%~ \\'1LLL~M Ll'Oii ~~~»r d~rr~/
BSdO ARCHIBAID. SUITE B, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91770 I71d) 980-4Pdd
June 8,1989
Steve Gilliland
Engineering Department
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.0. BO:C 807
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca.91730
RE: Tract 13279 & PM 10185
Transmitted herewith is the executed Extension For Improvement
Agreement for Tract 13279 and Parcel Map 10185 a check in the
amount of $251.00 for each is enclosed.
Our construction staff has informed r.~e that the Detention Basin
is complete and that we will he requesting final inspection and
release of the bonds on this facility ipmlediately. When the
bonds are released we will give the CL[y a maintenace bond if
required.
Extension of the improvement agreement for Victoria Park Lane and
the storm drain system are directly related [o [he completion of
Phase II A of Day Creek Channel. There is only a small portion
of the storm drain system to complete and that is the portion
that would connect to Day Creek Channel. Our completion of
v , .. ~~ . .1. ~ .. rw.. ~_~ ...... 1........1 ....• .. C T. ..r 1 7] ]Q t c a 1 e
uu. ..u u~ ... ~~ .. __ _ __ ___..
de pendent^upon completion of the channel construction.
Both Tract 13279 and Parcel Map 10185 are directly effected by
the detour plan for the work on Highland Avenue. It is my
understanding that this plan should be approved and a permit
issued within the next couple of weeks at which time work would
start immediately.
We are requesting an extension for both tract 13279 and parcel
map 10185 of 18 months. We would like to have your estimate for
completion of Phase II A of the channel this could help us in
determining exactly how much time we will need to complete our
projects.
!£ •..~e can provide further information regarding these improvement
agreement extensions please contact our office.
Res~{pyelc,,t~fu`l~l~y~~, ~
~' F.~"" ' f'""/wk~
Shari Newman
Project Management Assistant
Inland Empire Division /
REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 5, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, Ctty Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector
SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Coayletion
RECOMMENDATION:
The required street taprovements for DR 86-42 have been completed in an
acceptable manner and it 1s recoamended that City Council accept said
improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion
and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance and in
the aawuat of 162,000
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
DR 86-42 - located on the rarth side of Arrow Highway between Nh1te Oak
Avenue and Maple Place.
DEVELOPER: David Leff
P.0. Boz 1789
p.eaAa. !'1 g17AF
Release:
Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 162,000
Respe submitted,
RHM: :dlw
Attachment
1 /
RESOLUTION No. ~ ~ - 3 O
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAM0116A, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC INPROYEMENTS
FOR DR 86-42 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COIPLETION FOR THE NORK
MHEREAS, the construction of public iaproveawnts for DR 86-42 have
been coa~pleted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
NHEREAS, a Natlce of Coa~pletton 1s required to be filed, certifying
the work co~plete.
NON, THEREFORE, Lhe City Councii of the City of Rancho CucaaaMga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is
authorized to sign and file a Notice of Ca~pletlon with the County Recorder of
San Bernardino County.
~~ 7
- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 5, 1989
T0: C1ty Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Magutre, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. 011111and, Pubiic Morks Inspect r~
SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Coapletion
RECOI~ENOATION:
The required street fagroveaKnis for OR 87-60 have been caayleted in an
acceptable axnner a~ it 1s recoanended that City Council accept said
lagroveaents, authorize the C1ty Engineer to file a Notice of Coapletion
and authorize the C1ty Clerk to release the Faithful Perforaxnce Bond 1n
the aaxnxn of (69,000.
Background/Analysis
OR 87-60 - located on the west side of Red Oak Street, between Arrow
HTghwgy and Jersey Boulevard
DEVELOPER: Mertln Jaske, Inc.
10723 Bell Court
Release:
Faithful Perfor~ance Bond (Street) (69,000
Resp~ tted,
RNM SMB:
Attachoent
RESOLUTION N0. ~~' ~ I D
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE~CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPRDVEIENTS
FOR OR 87-60 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE YORK
YHEREAS, the construction of public laproveav!nts for DR 87-60 have
been coagleted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: and
IIHEREAS, a Notice of Coiapletion is required to be filed, certifying
the vork coaglete.
NOY, THEREFORE, the City Councti of the Ci;y of Rancho Cucaaa~nga
hereby resolves, that the wrk is hereby accepted and the City Engineer 1s
authorized to sign and file a Notice of Coagletlon M1th the County Recorder of
San Bernardino County.
/~ 9
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 5, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell N. Maguire, Cify Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilleland, Public Norks Inspector
SU&1ECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Caagletlon
RECO~EIDATION:
The required street Saproveaatnts for Tract 13248 have been caNpleted in
an acceptable wooer and it 1s recaaaaended that City Council accept said
laprovearents, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the aabunt of
515,000, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Caapletian and
authorize the Cittyy Claek to release the Faltbtul Pnrtorwnce B din the
aaaunt of f150,000. ,
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Tract 13248 - located an the south side of Highland Avenue between
Archibald Avenue and Nenaosa Avenue.
DEVELOPER: H 8 S Capital Enterprises
/Q51 D~wLyiw nr ~9r1r1
Covina, CA 91724
Accept:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 515,000
Release:
Faithful Perforwnce Bond (Streetl 5150,000
Respec u ubNtted,
RfM: Sl~i. dT~
AttachaKnt
(~~
RESOLUTION INI. g ~'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCINI
CUCAM0NGI1, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROYEMENTS
FOR TRACT 13248 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COIPLETION FOR TIE MORK
NHEREAS, the construction of public 1 rovesients for Tract 13248 have
been coayleted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
MHEREAS, a Notice of Coapletton is required to be filed, certifying
the work caaplete.
NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resoives, that the cork 1s hereby accepted aM the City Engineer is
authorized to sign and f11e a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of
San Bernardino County.
/~1
- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 5, 1989
T0: Ci fy Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. 6TllTland, Public Norks InspectoF-~'
SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion
~i .: ~1 ii~"A
The required street improvements for Tract 13060 have been completed in
an acceptable manner and Tt is recommended that C1ty Council accept said
1 rovements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of
548,000, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and
authorize the Cittyy Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the
amount of f480,000.
Background/Malysi s
Tract 13060 -located on the southwest corner of Mi111ken Avenue and
Fairmont Nagy.
DEVELOPER: The N1111am Lyon Company
8540 Archibald Avenue /B
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Accept:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) f48,000
Release:
Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 5480,000
Re/ sppepf 1 ted,
%j/J~ ~ "~
ANM:S
Attachment
/~
RESOLUTION N0. 8~- ~ 1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR TRACT 13060 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE NORK
NHEREAS, the construction of public tagrovea~ents for Tract 13060 have
been co®pleted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
NHEREAS, a Notice of CaaRletion is required to be filed, certifying
the work coaglete.
NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of Lhe City of Rancho Cuca~anga
hereby resolves, that the work 1s hereby accepted and the City Engineer 1s
authorized to sign and file a Notice of Coagletlon with the County Recorder of
San Bernardino County.
/~ 2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 5, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Publie Norks Inspector.
SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion
RECONEIDATION:
The required street improvements for Tracts 12590, 12590-2, and 12590-3 6 -4
have been completed in an acceptable men~r and 1t is recommended that City
Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds in
the amounts of f13,300, f2,550 and f1,80D respectively, authorize the City
Engineer to file a Notice of CampletTor~ and authorize the City Clerk to
release the Faithful Perfonaance Bonds in the mounts of (133,000, (25,500 and
S1a,ooo.
Background/Malysis
Tracts 12590, 12590-2, and 12590-3 8 -4 - located on the northeast corner of
Base Line Road and Valencia Avenue
DEVELOPER: Leris Hones
P.0. Box 670
Upland, CA 91786
Accept:
TR 12590 TR 12590-2 TR 12590-3 d -4
Maintenance Guarantee Bonds (Street) f 13,300 f 2,550 f 1,800
Release:
Faithful Performance Bonds (Street) (133,000
Res~.ec~tf sub~altted,
. ~ ~,~ ,
RHM:S •s
Attachment
(25,500 (18,000
/3~{
RESOLUTION N0. ~~ ' ~' 3
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR TRACTS 12590; 12590-2; AND 12590-3 d -4, AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE
NORK
NHEREAS, the Construction of public tagrovenents for Tracts 12590,
12590-2, and 12590-3 6 -4 have been coagleted to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Coapletton is required to be filed, certifying
the work coaplete.
NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaaonga
hereby resolves, that the work 1s hereby accepted and the City Engineer is
authorized to sign and file a Notice of Coapletlon with the County Recorder of
San Bernardino County.
/ 3.5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: duly 5, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works inspector
SUBJECT: Release of Maintenance Bond for Tract 12490 located at 8167
Vineyard, south of Foothill Boulevard
RECONEIDATIOM:
It is recaaasended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to
release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds.
Background/Analysis
The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street
improvements remain free fray defects 1n materials and vrorkmanship.
DEVELOPER: American National
Post Office Box 10
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Release:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 52,310.00
Respect idly submitted,
RHM: •s m
/3~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAtONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 5, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
fROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Ken Fung, Assistant Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II for the
proposed Hidden Farm Road Culvert and issuance of a Categorical
Exemption therefor
RECOMMEMBATIOM•
It is hereby recamsended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution
accepting and approving the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and I1 for
the proposed Hidden Fares Road Culvert and issuance of a Categorical Exemption
therefore and direct the City Clerk to filtr s Notice of Exemption pursuaet to
the California Envlronmetal Quality Att.
This report presents an Environmental Assessment Initial Study for the
proposed Nidden Fans Road Culvert.
In conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State
Guidelines, the attached document has been prepared to penait construction of
Said proiect entails the lnsta11at1on of a 33" RCP for drainage improvements
and same minor road work.
It is the Engineering Staff's finding that the proposed pro,~ect will not
create a significant adverse impact on the environment and theroforc recommend
that these improvements be classified as Categor1ca11y exempt.
Respectful submitted,
RHM:MD
Attachment
137
RESOLUTION N0. ~~' ~ I
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CDUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONfiA, CALIFORNIA, APPROYIN6 THE ENYIRONNENTAL
INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATE60RICAL EXEMPTION
FOR THE PROPOSED HIDDEN FARM ROAD CULVERT
NNEREAS, the City Council of the City Of Rancho Cucamonga bas
reviewed all available input concerning the proposed Hidden Fan Road Culvert;
and
NHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Initial SWQy has been prepared
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended.
NON, THEREFORE, be it resoived that the City Council of Lhe City of
Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION I: The City Council of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves the
Envlronmen ssessment Initial StuQy and issuance of a Cakgorical Exemption
for the proposed Hidden Fares Road Culvert.
SECTIQN 2: The C1ty Clerk is dlreckd t0 file a Notice of Exemption
pursuant tome i^ali'fornia Envlrormmnkl Quality Act.
/3~
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
APPLICATION
INITIAL STUDY -PART I
GENERAL
For all protects redacting environmental review, this form must be completed
and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where
the protect application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the
Planning Oiviston staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study and make
recommendations to Planning Comaission. The Planning Commission will make one
of Chree determinations: (1) The protect w111 have no slggnif to ant
environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, (2) The
protect w111 have a slgnificanL enviromianLal impact and an Envtranmental
Impact Report will be prepared, or (3) An addtttonal information report
should be supplied by the appltcaot giving further fnformatlon concerning the
proposed protect.
Date Filed:
Protect Title: Hidden Farm Road Culvert
,
._, ,,. ~oivyuune: ~~~y ui na ncnu uucamonga
v u Anx 8 z g32n Aa se i~g Rnad. Rancho Cucamonga. CA 5173D
Name, Address, Telephone of Person To Be Contacted
Concerning this Profeet: Kenneth Fun .Assistant Civil Engineer
1714) QA9-1867. Ext. 325
location Of Protect: Hidden Farm Road between Moonstone Avenue andrts eastern
farm inus road situated east of Carnelian Street.
Assessor's Parce}
List other permits necessary from local, regional, state and federal agencies
and the agency issuing such permits: None
/39
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Proposed use dr proposed pro,j ect: Pro iect involves construction of _c_ulve rt and
relatetl facilities to chapyel wxte de instead o£11YeL hidden Fa rn Road
Acreage of pro,lect area and square footage of existing and proposed buildings,
if any:
N/A
Describe the envirommental settin of the pro,Ject site including information
on topography, so st t ty, pants (trees), land animals, any cultural,
historieal or scenic aspects, land use of surroendt/tg prcpcrties, and the
description of any existing structures and their use (attaeh necessary
sheets): Tha portion of Hidden Farm Road under consideration is residential. The
road din< to allrce water from a n inral r annal in flow ddwnSL ream. The
,_pavamant. ;~ in bad shoo d~ to the continual presence of water. Trees line
both sides of the natural channel thouoh none are affected by the proposed
D YO ierL _ _
the arr nn knn n [ 7L rat historical or scenic aspects of anY 5idnifita ace.
Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative
actions, which although lndtvldually small, may as a whole have significant
environmental impact
Nu
~r~
HILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO
1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? ~
2. Create a substantial change in existin g noise df produce
vibration or glare? K
3. Crea[e a substantial change in demand for municipal
services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X
4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or General
Plan designations? g
5. Remove any existing trees? How manyT z
6. Create the need fcr use or disposal of potentially
hazardous materials such as toxic substances,
flammahles or explosivest _ g
Explanation of any YES answers above (attach'addittonal sheets if necessary):
Some regrading required to direct flows into the culvert.
~• Eai^aG `~C -~'~` f idw dya dnu auiiu eaa i.e ina ilr idl3 [nIS pr0]eCL
will generateWdaily:V
8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this
protect:_
9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and f1111ng) required far this
protect, in cub lc yards:
10. tf the protect involves the construction of residential units. conglete
the form an the next page.
CERTIFICATI011: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in
the attached exh 161 is Dresen! the data and information required for this
in ittal evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements,
and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and
Deltef. I further understand that additional information may be required to
be submitted hefore an adequate evaluation can be made by the Planning
0lvision.
pate: 5iinia~
I ~ ~ Signature
Title +1asi'a:-Engineer
. -"~ ~
. _ _ _.- _ _.. ~ _ .,.._,.,..M .. Ys~ ~... .. ~ . ...
RFiS iDEN7IAL CONSTRUCTION
The following informat ton should De provided *.o the City of Rancho Cucamm
Planning Division in order to aid the school district in assessing the
ability to accommodate the proDOSed residential development. Deve topers
reQulred to secure letters free the school district for aeeamnodating
increased number of students prior to lssuanee of building permits.
Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.
Spec if lc Location of Project:
PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TS'
1. Number of single
family units:
~~ 2. Humber of multiple
family units:
3. Oate proposed to
uegin construction:
4. Earliest date of
occupancy:
Modell
and I of Tentativs
5. Bedrooms Price Ranoe
I
~ ~ -~!'"~
exrY or aANCRO cocAaoeicA
PART II - INITIAL STUDY
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
DAIE'
APPLICANT: _ fity of Ra nrhn r~iramnnga
FItLNG DATE: LOC NDt91EA:
PRO.IECT: NiA.1nn ra„m Rn,,A r~~i ,,,,„r
PRO.4EL7 LOCATION: u„„ oacra„^ *^„m;^uc of •Li dtlnn Fa rnL-RGid
L. E.`NIAO\^fENTAL IMPACtS
(Explanaelon of all "yea" and "maybe" anavair era rpuitad on •teached
ahea ca).
YES MAYBE NO
1. So11a and Cealoav. Gill ehs propoul bane
^ignlfioanc zaeulca in:
a. Dm cable around ~e~e,.,,..c _„ _„ -..~r.~~. lu
gsolagit mlationahipaY ~
b. Dlnrupclona, diaplacsmenen, eompaecioa or
burial of cM aoil? ~- ~
c. Change So topography or ground aurtaca
eoncour inearvala4 ~_ _
d. fie dutrue tion, tovaring or aaditicaclon
of any unique geologic or phyaieal taaeuraa? ~
•. My potential ineraaw 1n viad or vamr
aroaioa of w11n, affac tang •icher on or off
efu condECana4
t. Changan Sn •ronion ail tacion, or dapoaiccon? _ K
g. Ezpcaur• o[ people or property to gao logic
hasarda such ae eaechquakaa, landn2ldn, mud-
alldaa, ground Callum, or almilar hasaeda4 ~ ~
h. Aa Snerease in the rata of ea[ract ion and/or
uae of any mineral raaouru? [
2
~
/ _ ~
r
~
J
2. Hydrola~. {1111 the pro ponal haV
sYgnftieane
reaulca Sn:
z
YES vAY9'
a. Changes is currants, or the cause of direction
of floving streams, rivara, az ephemeral screem
channels?
b. Chaagea 1n abaorp clan ra cos, drainage pacterns,
or the rocs and amount of surface vacer
ruro ff? X
c. Al carat loan co she course or floe of flood
voters? g
d. Change in Che amount of surfap voter fn any
body or va car? g
a. Discharge Snco aurtac• va cars, oz any
alteracioa of aurfaca voter quality? -_
f. Al utaclmn of groundvacer chartctarlaticat ~
g. Change Sa the quantl cy of gzouadvacars,
aicher through direst addiciona or vich-
drrvala, or through laurLnnu vich m
aquifer?
f1ua11tq?
puaneiey7 _ ~
h. The redact San !a the aaaunt of vsNt echer-
vfaa available for public vaur auppllu? ~
1. Expoaun of paopl• ar proparcy to war
reia cad hasarda ouch +a flooding or aaichu? __ ~
s. ASr Qual lcv. Y111 cha proposal have •lgniflcanc
ruin to So:
•. Cons cane or periodic a1r emiaalona Lror mobile
or indiraee sournet ~ ~ X
Sutfonaty aourua2 %
b. Deterloraclon o[ amb cant air qual icy and/or
Sotartaraau vlth the stcalnment of appllca6l•
eiz gwli qr atandardat _ ~
c, Al [.ration of local or regionaY elima cic
cood itlona, dtaocing alt anvsmen c, moistu[a
ar tempera cu re? X
4. giJcca
Flora. Nill cha proposal have slgnlf Scan[ taaul to
Sr,:
a. Change !n ehe <haracte rls cica of apsciu ,
including divers Sty, discrlb
u Lion, or number
,
of any spec lea oP plants?
- %
b. I I
Reducclon of the numbers o[
Tiny unique, rata %
or eadange ndapec Sas of Dlanta?
YES °..4Y?° :~~
c. Int roduttion of ntv or disruptive spat iea of
plants into an area? _ ~
d. Reduction io the pocen cial for agricultural
produccton? _. %
Fauna. [iSll ch• propoa al have algniflcant maul ca
ino
a. Change in the chazscreria tics of species.
incl uding dlveralcy, dlatribuciow, or numbers
of any spec iea of animals? ~ ~
6. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of animals? ~
c. Introdut clon of nw or disruptive epeaiu q[
animals into an area, or tool[ Sa s barrlax
ca the migraclan or sovemaa[ of aaisalsT g
d. DecerSOracion or removal of exlstiag tiah or
wildlife habitat? g
5. Po niarion. 4£1Z the proposal have aigAifieaat
resulca in:
a. 4tfi1 the Droposal altar cha location. diatrl-
bucion, dens icy, diveraitp, oz growth rata of
cha hu3an populatioa of an sru? e i
b. 41111 tM proposal al Let sxia tang housing, or
create a demand for eddltional housiagt %
b. So cfo-Economic Factors. 4111 the proposal have
signiiicanc ruults Sa:
a. Chas ge in Soul of regional aoeio-economic
characcerL tics, iacludiag acoaoafc ar
caamerc Ll divera3ty, tax rate, sad properep
veluuT K
b. 4111 pro~aU costs be equitably dietribuud
along pro~act banef iciariea, S.e., buge:e,
tax payers o[ pro Lett uppt _„ ~ K
7. Land L's• and Plannine Conrideraeions. 4111 Lha
p ropmal have signlf Scant ruulu in?
a. A subs canclal al ura cion of eh• preame or
planned land use of an area? ~ ~
b. A confli t[ with any des ignaclona, ob]eotivea,
polio iea, ar adopted plena of any governmancal
enc plea': ~~.1 /~ _
/ ~
c. M Sapact upon th•
qulai cy ar quan cley oC
existing conaumptly or non-consumptive X
recreational oppo rcunlCl aa? .
page ~
YES "AY3E VC
g. 7rananortation. pill the proposal have aignfficanc
renal ca 1n:
a. Ceneratlon of substantial addlclonal vehlculaz
movemaa c? X
b. Effecca on exiating scree ca, or demand Cor
nev acne[ conatrutt SOn? g
c. Effacca an existing parking fac llftiea, or
demand for nev parking? X
d. Subscantlal Smpact upon exla [Sag tranaporta-
tlon ayacann? X
•. Alceraciona to praaenc pattarna o[ cizcula-
[ion or avvamanc of paopl• and/or goods? X
f. A14rat1ana to or alfacts on prurnt and
pocanefal vacar-borne, rail, mesa tranalc or
air craffic? _ x
g. Incruaaa ie tra lfle hazards co motor vehfclu,
bicycliate or padae triana? x
9. Cultural Aeaouseaa, pill the proposal have
•Sgnif icant ruulca in:
a. A din curbanu to cha integrity of aethaologiul,
v+laontologiul, and/or hL COrical ruouroaa? X
proposal htve aignif Scant ruulta ln:
a. Craaeion of any health hasazd o[ po Gntial hutch
hazard? %
b. Expoaura of peapla to petantlal hutch hazards?
_ __ ~
t. A risk et as9loa ion or nluaa of hazardous
aubataeen So eha avant o[ an acddant?
_ ~
d. Aa leenu• in eha number of Lad ividwla
or apeclu of vaccor or pathanopnlc
mrgaeiama or the ezpoaur• of poop la to ouch
organlama?
a. Incr ua• in exia clog no is• taunts? X
_-
f. Expoaura a! people to pa eentlally dangaroua
noia• levala?
A• The creaeion of abJ ec tlonabl• odm ra
?
_ ~
/
h. M Lncruu In light or glarel /~/
„ X
Y°S Y41'3= AO
11. Aeatheclcs. Hill the proposal have algnlflcant
re sults in:
a. The o6acruc cion or dagradacSOn of any atonic
vler• ar vla? X
b. The ezeaclan of an aaachec Scally nffenalve
nice? X
_--
t. A conf llet with cha ob]ec rive of designated
ar pot en cial scenic corrldora? X
12. Ut111e1ea and Pub llc Saroieu. Hill eh. nze+g.,..l
have a algnificanc need Cor nav systems, or
alt eratlona to cha folloviag:
a. El act rde paver? X
b. Natural or packaged gas?
Y X
c. Coeeaunlaatlona systems? X
d. Hagar aupplyt X
e. Haacavacar facilltisat ~ _ X
f. Flood control acruecurasY X
g. Solid waste facilitLa? X
h. FSre prataction? X
1. Pol Sr• nrn orN nn7
], Schools?
k. Parks or other raeraatienal tat ilielnT
__ ~
1. Haintananca oY public Yac111c1p, lnclud ing
roads sad Ylood control facilitiaa?
A ~
^. Ocher govstnman ul aarvius?
- ~ b
13. Ena rn and Scarce Reaau rcea. fifll the proposal
Nava signlflusc results in:
a, L'ae cf subs cancial or uceaa h-a tual or snar¢v? v
b. Subacan cial lncreaaa Sn dmand upon as is clog
eau rtes of energy? X
c. M increase !n eha demand (or development oC
new sou rcea of energy?
7
~
d. M Sncrease or perpecuitian'oC the conaumpcian
of non-renevab la forma of energy, when Caaaib l•
cenevabl• sources of energy are avallab let X
page [
YES "AY9E VO
e. Subs[antLl depletion of any nonrenewable or
aearca natural resource? X
14. Nandacory FSndinga of Significant e.
a. Doaa the prol act haw the pacan[ial to degrade
eha gwli ty of eha environment, subs cancially
reduce eha hableac of fish or vlldllt• species,
caws a fish or vildlif• population to dran
b aiaw a:'_t ssc:lainj levels, threaten to
eliminau ^ plane of animal co®unicy, reduu
the number or rasezict eha reap of a rera or
endaapred pleat or animal or allslaare
lmporeanC a:amplea o[ the valor periods of
Csldtoznia history or prehla Cory? %
b. Does the prolecc have cha potential to achSava
shore-c arm, co eha dlsadvaaca~e of long-term,
anvironmanul Noala4 (A short-rers lspact oa cha
eaviromseac L oae which Devote 1a a zalatively
brief, deflnltive pariad oL c1s- while loas-
ure impacts will endure wall into the furusa). X
c. Dou the project have impacu vhlch are
indlvidwlly limited, but eumulatdvely
conaidarabla? (Cumulatively caaaidarahi•
means that the Soerewatal e![aeu of as
lndividwl prof etc •n canaiderabl• when viewed
1n connecclon with the •ftaeca of na.+ ~~-;--C-,
°nw ~'.-war iuWre QCaI eC U}, ^- ,_~ X
d. Does cha prof ace hwe anvSronmental effaces
which will cause euhacancdal advare• ailacca
on homes bainp, either directly or indiree ely? ~ X
1?. DiSCli55I9N OF ANPIAONNENTAL NALVATION (1. •., o! aflSCmacive answers co
the above Quaa cfona plus a diacuaaion of proposed mialpcSon meu urea),
~~8
page ;
III. DETER.YINAiION
On eh• baala of thla lnitlal eval ua clon:
I find the propaaad prm]ee r. COIIL7 NOS have a signif Scan[ affect
X% on the environment, and aCATE GOkI CAL EX EhIPTIGN uill be prepared.
_ I fiord chat al [hough the Dropoaed pra]ncc could have a eigniflcanr
effect on cha eavlronmant, [hare will not ba a algnif Scant effect
u In this tees 6ecauae cha mlclga [ion muaurea described on an
attached sheet have bun added co cha pro]¢c. A NEGATIVE
TOI1 ~0„
I find eha proposed pro]act NAY have a signlflcanc •ffecc on the
envirnmanc, and an ENVIAOYMENT L`~ACT REPORT Sa required.
Dau 5{lLi{8p
Sigma,
Engineer
Tf [la
I I
ENYIRONMENTAI IMPACTS
lc, Maybe - same regrading required to direct flows into the
culvert.
2b. Maybe - upstream flows will enter new channel instead of
spreading onto a field.
iZu. rieyue - d 2" ya6 iine and a d" water iine are iu~ and cu'
8 d. respectively south of the road centerline. Since their
exact depth fs unknown, St is uncertain whether these
lines interfere with the proposed culvert.
'~Q
- CITY OF RANCHO CL'CA~IONGA
STAFF REPORT
SATE: July 5, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: John L. Martin, Associate Civil Engineer
~~,
~?~'`
SUBJECT: Approval of Environmental Assessment and Issuance of a Categorical
Exemption for the proposed Sapphire Parkway Renovation and Trail
Retrofit from Banyan Avenue to north of Jennet Street.
RECDlfEMDATiDN:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution
approving the Environmental Assessment and issuance of a Categorical Exemption
for the proposed Sapphire Parkway Renovation and Trail Retrofit from Banyan
Avenue to north of Jennet Street.
BACKtltDUND/ANALYSIS:
This report presents an Environmental Assessment Initial Study for the
pre posed Sapphire Parkway Renovaticn and Petrofit for City Council approval
and issuance of a Categorical Exemption.
In conformance with the California Environmental nuati tv Arr anA cra to
Guidelines, the attached documents have been prepared to permit construction
of the parkway renovation. These improvements generally entail the renovation
of the Sapphire Street Parkway and Trail within the existing right-of-way.
It is the Engineering staff's finding that the proposed project is in
conformance with the proposed development of Sapphire Street as a coiiec for
arterial street will not create a significant adverse impact on the
environment and, therefore, recommend that these improvements be classified as
a Categorical Exemption.
Respectfull~bmitted,
i ~ ~~
~ /`l - ( -
NHM:JLIR'pGRr-
Attachment
/~ I
RESOLUTION N0. ~ 9_ 3 h
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL
EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED SAPPHIRE PARKWAY RENOVATION
AND TRAIL RETROFIT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has
reviewed all available input concerning the proposed Sapphire Parkway
ReOnVa T.?An and Trail De MnF: ,. ...A
WHEREAS, said improvements reoui re an Environmental Assessment; and
WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Ini ti ai Study has been prepared
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended.
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
approves Fie n~vi~onmental Assessment Initial Study and issuance of a
Categorical Exemptfon far she proposed Sapphire Parkway Renovation and Trait
Retrofit.
SECTION 2: The City Clerk is directed to file a Notice of
Determina io~ant to the California Environmental Quality Act.
/~ d
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
APPLICATION
INITIAL STUDY -PART I
GENERAL
rFCr all pro.i ects requiring en virnmm~ntet ro~ie~ ...;c Fo..r., ,.,.,..• h cc„r,. ,eted
and submitted to the Development keview Committee through the department where
the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the
Planning Division staff will Drepare Part II of the Initial Study and make
recommendations to Planning Commiss ion. The Planning Commission will make one
of three determinations: (1) The project wilt have no significant
environmental impact and a Negative Oeclarat ion will be filed, (2) ?he
project gill have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental
Impact Report will he prepared, or (3) An addtti onal information report
should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the
proposed project.
Date Filed: June 15, 1989
Project title: Sapphire Parkway Renovation and Trail retrofit
Applicant's Same, Address, Telephone: City of Rancho Cucamonga, P.G. Box 80Z
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (714) 989-1862
Name, Address, Telephone of Person To Be Contacted
Concerning this Project: Johc L. lia rtin, Assoc rate Ci vii cr~gineer
Ucatien of ?rojeet: 8znyan .~ver,se :., ~~orti~~ ~.," .erne: ;t~eec
Assessor's Parceb Vo.: NSA
List other permits necessary frrxn local, regional, state and federal agencies
and the agency 155u1np SU[h Oermitc~ ;tv rnr trur tinn n~rnit and tg nQ
CiGSLr'C Je rlnlt
Is3
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Proposed use or eropos ed project: Pz rkway renovation and enhancement of
_ pre sen` pa rkway `or public use and appreciation
Acreage of project area and square footage of existing and proposed buildings,
if any: oie t ea S a r c
Describe the environmental sett to of the project site including information
on topography, soi staoi ,ty, p ants (trees), land animals, any cultural,
historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding prop ert les, and the
description of any existing structures and their use (attach necessary
sheets): located in the northwestern portion of the Lity. Sapphire runs north
anc south wi ~h a steep southward slope. The parkwzy has exposed block walls,
plan c aon gran rd dirt The surrounding area is entirely residential.
is the project part of a larger project, one cf a series of cumulative
actions, which although tn4~oidually small, may as a whole have significant
environmental impact
'~~
RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCT?D9
The followring information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division in order to aid the school district in assessing their
ability to accommodate the proposed residential development. Developers are
required to secure letters from the school district for accommodating the
increased number of students prior to issuance of Building permits.
Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.
Specific Location of Project
PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL
1. Number of singie
family units:
2. Number of multiple
family units:
3. Date proposed to
begin construction:
u. tar nest sate or
occupancy: .!
MadelA
and 4 of Tentative
5. @edrncros price .Range
15-5
HILL THIS GROJECT: yE: :lp
-. Create a substantial change in gro and contours? _ ~
2. Create a substantial change in existing noise of produce
vibration or glare?
_ ~
3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal
services ;police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? _ X
4. Crea!z changes in the existing Zoning or General
Plan designations? X
5. 2emo ve any existing trees? Hnw many7_ g
6. Create the need for use or diso osal of potentially
hazardous materials such as toxic substances,
flammables or explosives? r
Explanation of any YES answers above (attach addi ticnal sheets if necessary):
1. Estimate the amount of sewagge and solid waste materials this project
will genera to dai lv: N/A
S. Estimate the number df auto and truck trios generated daily by
' this
preject•
~;~
9. Estimate the amount of grad my $cu tting and filling) required for this
pro; ect, in cab is yards'
10. If the project involves the construction of residential units, carnplete
the farm on the next page.
CERTIFILAT'.ON: f hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in
the attached exhibits presen4 the data and information required for *.his
in itiai evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the fac ts_. ctatamnnrc
-- nrr~a4;"n ,. - --
"'° ~'"` -- -.. re.ert"" "- -°e and w rr ect i:o the besc of my knowledge and
belief. ( further ~nnderstand~that additional information may be required to
be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be.~ade by the Planning
7i vi5 ion. ,~
.`)
mate: ,~ ~'- --
Signature ~~~~~1{~'
I ~ ~ Title - --- ..._-
CIT'! OF AAYC'?0 C.C.`!0\Gn
naTE: June 15, 1989
a-'p'-=C.::': CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGII
.. :G Dn:E: LOG SC)3E~:
p•°•D.:~C.: Saonhire Parkway Renovation and Trail Retrofit
F~D~ECT toc.lTlox: Banyan Avenue to north of Jennet Street
(Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached
sheets).
1. Soils and Geolor:. Ai11 the proposal have
sign is icanc :esul rs !n:
yr< H•vnc VO
a. l'ns ca63e grcurd <ond is ions ar ir. changes in
get loeit rela ri nn an ~~~+
~
6. _
D15 rup;ions, displacements, compac cion ar
burial of the soil? K
c. Change Ln topography ar ground sv dace
contour Ln[ervais? x
d. The destruction, covering or modification
of any unique geologic or ph}•sical features? X
e. My pocen clal increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, affec cing either on or off
site condieons? X
.. Changes in errs ran s.lca[fon. or depasicioo? g
g• Exposure of peon le or proper n• co geologic
hazards such as ear thgwakes, landslides, aud-
slldes, ground failure, or similar hazards? X
h• M Snc tease !n the race of extraction and/or
use of any mineral resource? X
2. Nyd rolo¢v. {1111 the proposal have significant
rrsulcs in: /
?age ~
YEa °_4Y?° t:0
a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction
of flovine streams, rivers, or epheceral scream
channels? X
b. Changes in absorp ci on races, drainage pac:ezns,
or the race and amount of surface eater
runoff? ,_ ~
c. Alcerat ions to the course or floe of flood
eaters? X
d. Change Sn the amount of surface va ter in any
body of eater? X
e. Discharge into surface va ters, or any
alcera ciao of surface eater quality? ~ ~(
., Alteration of groundvacer charac[ezis tics? __ ,(
g. Change in the quantity of groundva tern,
either through direct addic ions or vich-
dravals, or through interference vlch an
aquifer?
Quality?
Quantity? _ ~_ X
h. The reduction Sr. the amo unc of voter ocher-
vise available £or public eater supplies? K
i. Exposure of people or orooerty rn ear<.
related hazards such as flooding or seiches? x
3. Air Ovalf tv. W111 the proposal have signlf icanc
res alts in:
a. Constant or peTiodlc air emissions from mobile
or indirect sources? ,__ X
Stationary acurc es? ~
b. Decerlora clan of em6lent air qualley and/or
interference v1[h the a[ca Snment of applicable
air quality standards? ~ R
c. Alteration of local or regional climatic
conditions, affecting ai: mcvement, ma `s cure
or tempera to re7 ,_ ~
4. Biota
Flora. 17111 the proposal have signif Scant results
Sn:
a. Change 1n the charactaristica of speclas,
including diversity, dlstr Sbuefon, or number
of any species of plan cs? /~~ ~ ~ ~
D. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or esdangerad spec Sas of plants? ~ ~~ X
c• Introdur ion of aev or disruptive species of
plants into ar. area? x
d. Reducticn Sn the pocen tial :or agr'_culcural
production? R
Sauna. Wilt the proposal have signif is ant results
ia:
a. Change in the charatcerls ci cs of species,
1..^.c'_ _ing diversi:, discr!bucion, or nunbers
of any species of animals? x
b. Reduction of the nuxbers of any unique, rata
or endangered species of an'_cals' ~ %
c. Introduction of nev or disruptive species of
animals into an area, or result in a barrier
co [he nl3ration or movenenc of annals? __ ~
d. De cerloracion or removal of existing Eish or
vildl ife habitat? _ ~.,
poouiation. Wf 11 [he proposal have significant
results in:
a. Will the prooosai alter the location, dis[zi-
butiun, density, diversity, or grevch race of
the h:ran popular ion of an area? __ K
,,. Dili tae proposal atcect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing? X
Socio-Econonic Fac rots. Will the proposal have
sign:: icanc results in:
a. Change Sn Iocal or regional socio-economic
characteristics, including economic or
cc~ercSal diversity, tax rate, and property
values? X
b. W111 project costs be equ!rably distributed
among project beneficiaries, S.e., buyers,
tax payers or proj ett users? K _
land tae and p:anni na Considerations. W111 the
proposal have stgntf icanc resui cs in?
a. A substantial site ra clop of ehe pres enc or
planned land use of an area? __ %
6. A conflict vi[h any des !gnat Iona, obj eccives,
polScies, or adapted plans of any governmental
entities? /~ _ __ .X
e. M Smpace upon ehe qulalcy or quantity of
exla ring consumptive or non-consumptive
recraacional opportunities? _, ~ _
5
6
7
p~-e .
"_S "4Y3~ XO
B. Transnoztatlon. Will the proposal have significant
resui[s in:
a. Cenerat ion of substantial addlt!nnal vehicular
movement?
- 7L
h. Effects on existing streets, or demand for
nev street construction? x
c. Effects on existing parking facilities, o:
demand for nev parking?
_- X
d. Substantial impact upon existing eransporca-
cion systems? K
e. Alt ezacions to present patterns of circula-
tion mr movement of people and/or goods? X
f. Alterations Co or effects on present and
poten cial voter-borne, rail, mass transit or
air traffic? X
g. Increases Sn traffic hors: ds to motor vehicles
,
6icyclis is or pedest rlans?
__- x
9. Cu?rural Rnsources. Will the proposal have
s ignii icon[ results in:
a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological,
Oa~Pnnf nlnnln.l
c
.......:..e. .~a~iu Lei
~____, _.. _. _ ~ ~
10. Y.a :1 th, gaferv, and Nuisance Factors. Will the
proposal have significant resin es in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or po cent lal health
hazard?
- -_ 1L
b. Exposure of people [o potential health hazards? ~
c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous
substances in the event of an act idenc? __ ~
d. M increase in the number of individuals
or species of vet cor or pat heno gen lc
organisms or the exposure of people co such
organisms?
-- ~
e. Increase Sn existing noise levels?
__ ~
f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous
noise levels?
_ e ~
8• The creation of ob~eccionabl• odors? _ __ ~
h. M increue in light or glare? /~ O ~
?ase
'i .S "_11'5= ::0
11. Aesthetics. HSll the proposal 'nave sigriHcant
resuia in:
a. '_'he obstruction or degradation of any scenic
vista or view? X
b. :'he creation of an aeschet Scally offensive
site?
~.
c. A conflict vlth the o6iective of designated
or po ten cial scen': corrldcrs? _ ~
1:. Vt ilities and Public Services. Hill Lhe proposal
have a signi:icant need for new sys Gems, or
alcerac Ions to the folloving:
a. El etc zit power? X
b. Natural ar packaged gas? ~
c. Communications sysc ems? ~
d. HaCet supply?
~
e. Hascewater facilities?
Y
f. F1 ood control structures? _ ~
g. Solid waste facilities? X
h. Fire protecC ion? g
i. Police pro teccion?
Y
j. Schools?
- ~ JL
k• Parks or other recr eatia nal fat illfies? X
1. Malnrenance of public fat S11c1e s, including
roads and flood control facilities?
~
m. Other governmental services?
~
13. Ener¢v and Scarce gesou rimes. H111 the proposal
hat e s1gnlCiwnc results in:
a, L'se of substantial or ex cesslce fuel or energy? ~
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy? X
c. M increase in the demand for development of
new sources of energy? /! / _ ~
d. M increase or perpetuscSon of the consumption
of non-rsnwab le fo ms of energy, when feasible
renwabls sources o[ energy ate available? X
?a.e 5
YES >;1Y3°_ `0
e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or
scarce natural resource' ~
14. `facdacorv F!ndln¢s of SS¢-+fica e.
a. Does the project have [he pot encial to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of fish oz wildlife species,
cause x fish or wildlife population co drop
below self auscaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plan[ or animal community, reduce
the number or res [tic: the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory? ~
b. Does the project have the potential ca achieve
shore-tern, to the disadvantage of long-ter,
environmental goals? (A short-tern impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitive period of time while long-
tern impacts will endure yell into the future). ~
c. Does the project have impacts which are
individually li=iced, but cuaulaeively
considerable? (Cumulatively considerable
means that the incremental effec to of an
individual project are considerable when viewed
Sn connection with the effects of past prof ec cs,
.• -~_~.
d. Does the ptoj ec[ have environmen [al effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or indirectly? __ ~
II. DIECCSSIDA OF EVVIROWF'1TAL EVALIIATIOtl (i.e., of affir-..alive answers to
the above questions plus a discussion of proposed ciclgaelon measures).
1
~~
IIF. DETE?_". ":ATI C1:
Qn the has is of eh!s inlclal avaluacion:
I find [he proposed proj ec[ CCLL7 `IOT have a si5nif !cane a?: ecc
%A on the envlronoen c, and a GIE60RIGL EIIEMPTI(IN should be issu¢tl.
I find chac alchaugh the orepesed proj ecc could have a slgn!f!canc
I I effect on [he em: ironaen c, [here vi11 na[ be a sicnii!canc a??ecc
L- in cSis case because the o![!;scion aeasures des[r'_b ed on an
accached sheec hate been added ro the pro iec t. A `:EG+'A ='
DECli.A.GTIO:J HILL 9E PREP,IRED. ,
C I find the prooc sed prej ec[ D!4y have a slcniflcanc eif ecc ,-n [he
Ienvirnnen c, and an E:S'I nC:~~^. ; I`L^ACT 1P.EPORi is reGUired.
Date 47 _ z V ... i~ t ~ ~r.l.l.iny,. ~t i.V' •1~C~
S igoa cure
'v r'. 1,,.~.'.i ~Nri..~,4d.-~
/ (~ 3
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
SAPPHIRE PARKWY RENOVATION AND TRAIL RETROFIT
6b. The pro,~ect is to be funded by Citywide Deautiflcatton fees.
7c. The pro,~ect nWy provide additional recreational opportunities with the
iwproveaw!nL of the equestrian tra11.
I ~~
CITY OF RANCHO CCCAilIONGA
STAFF REPORT ^~
DATE: July 5, 1989 I
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Otto Kroutll, Deputy City Planner ~
SUBJECT: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY VARIANCE 89-04
request to grade and pave 5pprox ma e y acres o an and
a request to reduce the parking setback from 25 feet to 8
feet and the landscape setback from 35 feet to 8 feet 1n the
Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 91, located
do the south side of Jersey Boulevard, between Utica and
W ncent Avenues - APN: 209-143-07, 08, 09
I. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the attached Resolutions of Genial,
per ounc rection.
II. BACKGROUFD: At the June 21, 1989 meeting, the City Council held a
ear ng on this appeal. At the close of the hearing, the Council
determined that the findings required for the granting of a
'ra riance could not ne made and upheld the Planning Commission
decision. Staff was requested to prepare Resolutions of Denial for
Council action for both the Variance and the associated Ml nor
Oevel opment Review.
L Re rxrul s fitted
yC
Br d B er
Cit anner
BB :OK :ko
Attachments: Resolutions of Denial
/ W
RESOLUTION N0. X~-J~ 31 l~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA DENYING VARIANCE N0. 89-04 TO REDUCE THE
PARKING SETBACK FROM 25 FEET TO 8 FEET AND REDUCE THE
LANDSCAPE SETBACK FROM 35 FEET TO 8 FEET FOR 12 ACRES OF
LAND LOCgTED ON THE SOUTH S[DE OF JERSEY BOULEVARD
BETWEEN UTICA AND VINCENT AVENUES IN THE MINIMUM
IMPgCT/HERVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 9), AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-143,-07, 08, 09
A. Recitals.
(i) Commercial Carriers has filed an application for the issuance
of the Variance No. 89-04 as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as
"the application".
(ii) On April 26, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application
and continued said hearing to May 10, 1989.
(iii} On May 10, 1989, the Planning Commission denied the
application on the basis that the required findings could not be made.
(iv) The Planning Commission's denial was aDPealed to the City
Council and on June 21, 1989, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
(v) All leq al prerequisites to the adooticn of this Resolution have
occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, ft is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
City Cou nr.il of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during
the above-referenced public hearing on June 21, 1969, including written and
oral stiff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby
specifically finds as follows:
I w W
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0.
RE: VR 89-04 - COMMERCIAL CARRIERS
July 5, 1989
Page 2
(a) The application applies to property located at 10807
Jersey Boulevard with a street frontage of 814 feet and an average lot depth
of 673 feet and is presently improved with an office, warehouse, and parking
tat; and
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is multi-
tenant industrial, the property to the south of that site consists of a
warehouse, the property to the east is vacant, and the property to the west is
a warehouse; and
(c) The application applies to a site that is currently
improved with an office building, warehouse building and parking lot and is
considered a legal non-conforming lot; and
(d) Municipal Code Section 17.06.0206 authorizes the City
Planner to impose reasonable conditions upon a Minor Oevelopnent Review permit
approval, including requirements for landscaping, street improvements,
regulation of vehicular ingress, egress and traffic circulation, establishment
of development schedules or time limits for performance or completion; and
(e) Municipal Code Section 17.06.020A states that the purpose
and intent of the Minor Development Review permit process is to assure that
such limited projects comply with all applicable City Standards and
Ordinances; and
(f) The site plan submitted in conjunction with the
application, does not meet the Industrial Soecif is Plan standard of a 35-font
average landscape setback and minimum 25-foot parking setback, as measured
from the ultimate face of curb. Further, the site plan and existing chain
link fence improvements do not meet the Industrial Specific Plan standards for
screening outdoor storage of vehicles within 120 feet of a street frontage
with masonry, concrete or other similar materials; and
(g) The site currently is improved with four driveways within
820 feet of street frontage. The City's access policy for arterial streets
specifies that driveways on the same side of a street be spaced 300 feet
apart. Therefore, only two driveways would be allowed on this site. Further,
driveways should align with driveways on the opposite side of the street or by
off-setting a safe distance to avoid conflicting left-turn movements. The
City's access policy also requires the access be located a minimum 100 feet
from intersections.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Cou ncfl
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
/~7
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0.
RE: VA 89-04 - COMMERCIAL CARRIERS
July 5, 1989
Page 3
(a) That strict or literal interpretation and
enforcement of the specified regulation would not
result in practical difficulty qr unnecessary
physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives
of the Development Cade.
(b) That there are not exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions applicable to the
property involved or to the intended use of the
properties in the same district.
(c) That strict or literal interpretation and
enforcement of the specified regulation would not
deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the
owners of other properties in the same district.
(d) That the granting of the Variance would constitute a
grant of special privilege inconsistent with the
limitations on other properties classified in the
same district.
(e) That the granting of the Variance would be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the Vicinity.
4. Based uDOn the findings and conclusions set forth in oaraq raohs
1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby denies the application.
5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
I W$
RESOLUTION N0. J( ~_ ~ '
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA DENYING MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW N0. 87-71,
!OCATED AT 10801 JERSEY BOULEVARD IN THE MINIMUM
IMPACT/HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 9) OF THE
INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 209-143-07, 08, 09
A. Recitals.
(i) Commercial Carriers has filed an appllcation for the approval
of Minor Development Review No. 81-71 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review
request is referred to as "the application".
(ii) On the 26th of April 1989, the Planning Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and continued said
meeting to May 30, 1989.
(iii) On May 10, 1989, the Planning Commission denied the
application.
' (iv) The Planning Commission's denial was appealed to the City
Council and on June 21, 1989, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a du iy noticed public hearing on the aDPlicat ion.
(v) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds Lh at all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during
the above-referenced meeting on June 21, 1989, including written and oral
staff reports, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located at 10807
.lerc ay Rpi~lnyard with a street frontage of 814 feet and an average lot depth
of 673 feet and is presently improved with an office, warehouse and parking
lot; and
/~9
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0.
RE: MDR 87-11 - COMMERCIAL CARRIERS
July 5, 1989
Page 2
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is multi-
tenant industrial park, the property to the south of that site consists of a
warehouse, the property to the east is vacant, and the property to the west is
a warehouse; and
(c) The application applies to a site that is currently
improved with an office building, warehouse building and parking lot and is
considered a legal non-conforming lot; and
(d) Municipal Code Section 17.06.0206 authorizes the Cfty
Planner to impose reasonable conditions upon a Minor Oevelopnent Review permit
approval, including requirements for landscaping, street improvements,
regulation of vehicular ingress, egress and traffic circulation, establishment
of development schedules or time limits for performance or completion; and
(e) Municipal Code Section 17.06.020.A states that the purpose
and intent of the Minor Development Review permit process is to assure that
such limited projects comply with all applicable City Standards and
Ordinances; and
(f) The site plan submitted in conjunction with the
application, does not meet the Industrial Specific Plan standard of a 35-foot
average landscape setback and minimum 25-foot parking setback, as measured
from the ultimate face of curb. Further, the site plan and existing chain
link fence improvements do not meet the Industrial Specific Plan standards for
screening outdoor storage of vehicles within 120 feet of a street frnntaa_n
with masonry, concrete or other similar materials; and
(g) The site currently is improved with four driveways within
820 feet of street frontage. The City's access policy for arterial streets
specifies that driveways on the same side gf a street be spaced no less than
300 feet apart. Therefore, only two driveways would be allowed on this
site. Further, driveways should align ~.vith driveways on the opposite side of
the street or by off-setting a safe distance to avoid conflicting left-turn
movements. The City's access policy also requires the access be located a
minimum 100 feet from intersections.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council
during the above-referenced meetings and upon the specific findings of facts
set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes
as follows:
(a) That the proposed project is not consistent with the
objectives of the General Plan; and
'7^
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
RE: MDR 67-11 - COMMERCIAL CARRIERS
July 5, 1989
Page 3
(b) That the proposed use is not in accord with the objective
of the Industrial Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the
site is located; and
(c) That the proposed use is not in compliance with each of the
applicable provisions of the Development Code; and
(d) That Lhe proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
4. Rased upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby denies the application.
.~
17~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
OA?E: July 5, 1989
TO: City Council and City Manager / y-,e, d~
FROM: Jerry B. Pulwood, Ueputy City Managey) % A\Y
o/~ by ,
9y: Oiare O'Real, Administrative Analyst" mil,
SUBJECT: Refuse Rate Adiu etment CYO
RECOMMENOATIOq:
Staff re ccaJ;,e non the Aefuee Rate Adjustment be set for a Public Hearing on the
July 19, 1989 City Council agenda.
BACROROOND:
On May 22, 1989, the Board of Bupervleore approved an increase in the dump fee
effective July 1, 1989.
With the approved increase in the dump fee, the City's franchised haulers have
requested a rate adjustment. The franchised haulers are preliminarily proposing
a rate adjustment of $11.66. This amount represents approximately a 31.88
increase on all residential and commercial rates. staff ie continuing to analyze
e pa ~pvseu prniimiuaty uuauwsan nud auciutpecen 2iuauau:q cne race au 7uncmenc
by Friday, July 14, 1989.
Accordingly, the Rancho Cucamonga Munic Lpal Code, Chapter 8.17 Res itlential Refuse
Collect ion, Sections 8.17.280 )B) and 8.19.280 )B) Rate Adjustments, states all
revisions in charges levied by a permittee mu et be submitted to the City Council
for review and action, and mu et be approved by reeolut ion of the CLty Council
following a public hearing upon at least ten Jaye written notice to the
permittee. To meet this requirement, staff recommends a public hearing regarding
a eeEuee rate adjustment be set for the July 39, 1989 City Council agenda.
Respectfully submitted,
Jerry B. Fulwood
Deputy City Manager
JBP:jle
89-436 I ~ 1
ORDINANCE NO. 58-C
as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 12.08.955 TO THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO AN
EEEMPTION FOA PRIVATE STAEBTS FROM STREET DEDICATION AND
CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain
SECTION 1: Chapter 12.08 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal code is
hereby amended by adding thereto a new Section 12.D8.055, to be read, in words
and figures, as follows:
"12.08.055 Construction of Public Improvements - Exempt ion of
Private Street e.
A. The provisions of Chapter 12.OR shall not apply to private
residential attests ae follows:
"(1) Those private residential streets permitted to be
established by the City of Rancho Oucamonga pursuant to Subdivie ion
Ordinance and/or Development Code procedure e; and
"(2) Those private residential streets which have been
epegifically exempted by resolution of the City Council.
"B. Exemption of Private Si testa - procedure. The City Council,
noon the filing of an Application Petition and following a noticed public
hearing, may adopt a resolution deeignat ing a prLvate residential et rest,
or a portion thereof, exempt from the provisions of Chapter 12.08.
"(1) Oef initione:
"(a) 'Private Residential Street' shall mean a private
street in a residential area established ae private, or for
which offers of dedication were not requested, pursuant to the
pre-incorporation Ban Bernardino County subdivision/
development procedures.
"(b) 'Application Petition' shall mean a petition
bearing the names and addressee of property owners
representing, at minimum, sixty percent (608) of the
properties front i-,y on the private residential street prcposed
for exemption. The Application Pet It ion shall contain, or
have attached thereto: the name of the street and deecrlpt Lon
(in words or by map depiction) of that portion of the private
residential street proposed for exemption; a map depicting the
street addressee and approximate locations of those property
owners sLgning the application petition; and, a vicinity map
showing the approzlmata location of the private residential
street in relation to exist ing surrounding streets to a
dietnnce of approximately one-half mile.
173
Ordinance No. 58-C
Page 2
"(2) P[oceduree - Notice and Hearing. The Application Petition
shall be filed with the City Clerk of the City of Aancho Cucamonga
together with payment of appropriate fees. Vpon receipt of the
Application Petition, the City Clerk shall schedule the matter for a
public hearing before the city council occurring at a regular meeting no
later than sixty (60) days following the filiny of the Application
Petition. Notice of the public hearing eha11 be provided in accordance
with the provieione of Section 17.02.110 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code
"(3) Raw irements:
"(a) The traffic flow on the private residential street shall
consist primarily of the ingress and egress of the ceaidente along
such street and their guests, without customary usage by non-
reeidente ae a route of passage;
^(b) The proposed private residential street shall intersect
with no more than two (2) existing or proposed public etreetsi and
"(c) Sufficient off-cite and on-site parking, in conformity
with the requirements of the Development Code, shall be provided.
^(4) Findings - The City Council shall approve the private
residential etteei exemption request if, based upon eubetant Lal evidence
presented at the publ lc hearing, the Council finds all of the following:
"(a) The private residential street is in conformity with the
^(b) The private residential street meets all of the
requirements get forth in this Section; and
"(c) The exemption of the private residential street will not
adversely affect the health, aafety or welfare of those persons antl
propert iee adjacent to, and in the vicinity of, such street.
"(5) vacation. In the event one or more offers of dedication have
previously heen accepted on the proposed private roe idential street, no
resolution adopted pursuant to the terms and provie ions of this section
shall be effective until all each dedicated property is vacated and
abandoned and each abandoned right-of-way ie sold to, and accepted by the
owners of those properties which originally offered each dedication. For
ihn o_.p.,oe of ih L•' _err inn, the wain pLirn n£ a~.trh anandnneA and nvr naa
right 1of-way will be one dollar ($1.00) plus e11 co ate of transfer,
provided, however, that sold costa of trenefer may be waived Dy the Clty
Council on a case-by-case basis.
"(6) Cond itione. In adopting any auto xeeolut ion, the City Council
may lmpoee any reaeona6le condltione deemed neceeaery by the Clty Engineer
to protect the healthy welfare and sePety of those persona and propert iee
Ln and around the private reel7eniial eireet.
I f
Ordinance No. 58-C
Page 3
"(7) P_~g. The City Council may, by reeolut ion, establish a fee
to recover the coats involved in the zevieu and proceaeing of the
Application Petition.
SECTION 2: The City Council d¢claree that, should any provision,
section, paragraph, sentence or word of Chia Ordinance be rendered or declared
invalid by any final court action in a court of ewapetent jurisdiction, or 6y
reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections,
paragraohe, s¢ntencea, anA words of ihie Ordinance shall remain in full force
and effect.
SECTION 3: Tha Mayor shall sign ihie Ordinance and the City Clerk
shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) dnye after its passage
at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published
in the City of Ontario, Calitornia, end circulated in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
I 1
ORDINANCE NO. 28-C
as follows:
as follows:
as follows:
as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OP THS CITY COUNCIL OF TFL CITY OF RANCHO
COCAHONGA, CALIFOFUiIA, AHRNDING TITLE 16 OF TH8 RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING SUBDIVISIONS
The Ciiy Council of the City of Aancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain
SECTION 1: Section 16.16.130 of Chapter 16.16 ie amended to read
"16.ifi.130 Appeals -- By Subdivider. If the subdivider disagrees
with any action by the Planning Commies ion with respect to the
tentative subdivision map, he may, within ten (30) days of such
decision file an appeal with the City Clerk. Th¢ Council shall
consider the appeal within thirty (30) tlays unless the subdivider
coneenta to a continuance. This appeal shall be a hearing with
notice to the subdivider and the Planning Commies ion, and upon
conclusion of the hearing, the Council ehal 1, within ten (30) days,
declare Lte findings. The Council may sustain, modify, reject or
overrule any recommendations or rvlings aE the Planning Commission
and may make such findings ae are not inconsistent with the
provisions of this title or the State Subdivision Map Act.^
SECTION 2: Section 16.16.140 cf Chaptet 16.16 is amended to zead
"16.16.140 Appeal -- By Inters etsd Person s. A. Any member of City
Council or Clty et off or any interested person affected by a
decie i.on of the Planning Commission, may file a complaint with the
City Council concerning each decie ion. Any such complaint shall be
filed with the City Clerk within ten (10) days after the action
which ie the subject of the complaint, No complaint shall be
considered after the ten (30) day period. The Ciiy Council shall
eat the matter for hearing. The hearing shall be held within thirty
(30) deye aPtet the filing of the complaint pursuant to the
procedures Contained in Section 16.16.130, with additional notice
being given to the affected interested persona.
B. Upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council Baal 1, with In
ten (10) day e, declare its findings based upon the testimony and
documents produced before it. It may sustain, modify reject or
c:rerru le any recor...endat ions or ru lirgs of the P1arning Cpmmissior.
and may make such findings ae are not inconsistent with the
provisions of ihie tit le.^
SECTION 3: Section 16.16.150 of Chapter 16.16 ie amended to read
~~
Ordinance No. 2S-C
Page 2
"16.16.150 Appeal -- Par G r 1 Pla d Spa 'f' P1 C 'tv.
Any interested person may appeal any decision of the Planning
Commission relative to conformity to the General Plan or any
Specific Plan of the City to the City Council within ten (10) days
of approval or conditional approval. Such appeal and hearing
thereon shall be in accordance with section 16.16.130.'•
SECTION 4: Section 16.16.160, Subeect ion A, of Chapter 16.16 is
amended to read ae follows:
"16.16.160 Expiration. A. The approval or conditional approval
of a tentative subdivision map shall expire twenty-four (24) months
from the date of the adoption of the resolution by the Planning
Commission approving or conditionally approving the map. An
extension to the expiration date may be approved ae provided in
Section 16.16.170(E)."
SECTION 5: Section 16.16.1'10, Subeect ion C, of Chapter 16.16 ie
amended to read ae follows:
as follows:
as follows:
as follows:
"Time Limit of Extension. C. Extene ions may be granted for a
period or periods not exceeding a total of three years."
SECTION 6: Section 16.20.070 of Chapter 16.20 is amended to read
"16.20.070 Anceele -- By Subdivider. It the subdivider disagrees
with any action by the Planning Commission with respect to the
tentative map, he may, within ten (10) days of Lhe receipt of such
decision, appeal such action to the City Council in accordance with
ennttne t6 to tin.^
SECTION 7: section 16.20.000 of Chapter 16.20 ie amendetl to reatl
^16.20.080 Appeals -- ev Interested Pereone Adversely Affected.
Any interested par eon adversely affected by a decie ion of the
Planning Commission with respect to the tentative parcel map may,
within ten (10) days of such decision, file an appeal with the City
Clerk in accordance with Section 16.16.140."
SECTION 8: Section 16.20.090 of Chapter 16.20 is amended to read
"16.20.090 Eaton. The approval or conditional approval of the
teutat ive peruei snap shall axplrw twenty-four (241 months from the
date of adoption of the resolution by the Planning Commission
approving or conditionally approving the map. The axpirat ion of the
approved or conditionally approved tentative parcel map she 11
CermSnate all proceed loge and no parcel map of ell or any port loo
of the real property included within such tent at ivu parcel map shall
be filed without Eirst processing a neW tentative parcel map,
I 1
Ordinance No. 28-C
Page 3
SECTION 9: Section 16.20.100, Subsection C, of Chapter 16.20 ie
amended to read ae follows:
Time Limit of Rxteneion. C. Hxtanaione may be granted for a period
or periods not exceeding a total of three (3) year e.
SECTION 30. The City Council declares that, should any provia ion,
section, paragraph, sentence or word of this ordinance De rendered of declared
invalid by any final court action in a court of competent iuriediction, or by
reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections,
paragraphs, sentences, and words of this ordinance shell remain in full force
and effect.
SRCTION 11: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk
shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage
at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published
in the City of Ontario, California, end circulated in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
178
ORDINANCE N0. 396
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY f,OUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGR, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC
PLAN TO INCLUDE SMALL OPERATION BUILDING CONTRACTORS
WHICH MEET CERTAIN CRITERIA IN THE LAND USE DEFINITION OF
"BUILDING MAINTENANCE SERVICES"
WHEREAS, on the 21st day of June, 1989, the City Council held a duly
noticed public hearing pursuant to Section 65864 of the California Government
Cvde.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as
follows:
SECTION 1: The land use definition of "Building Maintenance
Services" is amended to read as follows:
Bu it din Maintenance Service: Activities typically
include, but are not invited to: maintenance and
custodial services, window cleaning services,
disinfecting and exterminating services, and janitorial
services. Small operation contractors may be included in
this category, provided that the contractor has no
outdoor storage of any materials or equipment, no
inoperable vehicles or non-mo to rued trailers, nor any
vehicles in excess of 84" in width or 6,000 pounds in
gross Weight.
SECTION 2: This Council finds that this amendment will not adversely
effect the environment and hereby issues a Negative Declaration.
SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk
shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its
passage at least once in The Dail Re ort, a newspaper of general circulzt+on
published in the City of nta rio, Ca ifornia, and circulated in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California.
~~9
- C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: Juty 5, 1989
T0: CTty Council and City Manager
FROM: Russett H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Walt Stickney, Associate Civ11 Engineer
SUBJECT: Amendment to TiNe 12 of the MuMcipal Code allowing exclusion of
the construction of sidewalks on residential streets
RECOMIE1DIlTION
It is recommended that the City Council conduct a public hearing and introduce
the ordinances relative to the provisions for deletion of sidewalks on
specific streets as approved by resolwtioa.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The requirements of the Municipal Code regarding the construction of sidewalks
consistent with City standards (Title 12i continue to be a source of
irritation with property owners Droposing to build or remodel single-family
residences. Because of the unique nature of some residential areas of the
community, there have been requests of the Ctty from developers to forego the
requirement of constructing sidewalks on both sides of the street, especially
in nnisiee areas.
The Development Code (Title 17) requires area streets except in the the case
of a planned coaawnlty or sD~Tfic plan which has established specific
standards.
An Ordinance has been prepared which rauld allow the City Council by
resolution to designate certain streets as exempt from the requirement of
standard sidewalk construction.
This ordinance was first introduced on June 21, 1989, however, Council
requested that an Intent paragraph be added. This is the reintroductfon of
that Ordinance.
/ R/espe~Yf~'T~~,s~ubCm~itted,
RH : dN~~/
Attachment
l go
ORDINANCE NO. 58-0
as follows:
AN ORDINANCB OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP TES CITY OP RANCHO
COCAMONGA, CALIBORNIA, ADDING SECTION 12.08.040(A) TO
TA6 RANCHO CUCAHONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO AN
EXSMPTION PROM TEiB CONSTRUCTION OP SIDEWALKS ON CERTAIN
IIESIDENTIAL STREETS
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain
56CTI0N 1: Chapter 12.08 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is
hereby amended Dy adding thereto a new Section 12.08.060(A) to be read, in worda
and figure e, ae follows:
'•12 .08.0401A1 Construction of Public Imorovemente - Reauirementa.
A. The provisions of Chapter 12.08.040 shall exclude the construction of
sidewalks on residential streets which have been specifically exempted by
resolution of the City Council.
B. Paragraph A above shall apply only to those residential streets, or
portions of residential etreaie, which are of such a unique nature that
would set them apart from the general city. Examples would include some
h illeids davelepmente, portions of streets abutting erase where sidewalks
have not been requlrad In the past, or areas where a sidewalk could not
be constructed due to existing or proposed physical constraints ae
determined Dy the City Engineer.
SECTION 2: The City Council declares that, should any provision,
section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared
invalitl by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by
reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections,
paragraphs, sentences, and worda of this Ordinance shall remain in full force
and effect.
SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Cleric
shall cause the same to be pu6liehed within fifteen (15) days after rte passage
at least once in The Deily Remrt, a newspaper of general circulation pu6liehed
in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
~$r
- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
I
DATE: July 5, 1989
TO: Mayor, Members of City Council & City Manager
FROM: Jerry 8. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE RESOLUTIONS DECLARING
RESULTS OF ELECTION, AUTHORIZING PRELIMINARY
ISSUANCE OF' BONDS AND LEVYING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX
AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE LEVY
OF SPECIAL TAXES FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
BB-2
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council approve the attached
resolutions which declare the results of election, authorize
preliminary issuance of bonds and levying annual special tax
for Co~mnunity Facilities District 88-2. It is further
recommended that Council hold first reading of the attached
Ordinance authorizing the Levy of Special Taxes.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
As authorized by City Council action, an election of property
owners within the boundary of Cortmunity Facilities District
88-2 was held on June 27, 1989. The first resolution
constitutes the formal action of the City Council declaring
the results of the election,
The attached ordinance authorizes the an rual levy of the
special tax according to the rate and formula set forth in
Exhibit A.
The second resolution provides preliminary authorization to
issue bonds and to order the validatior. proceedings.
The third resolution levies the annual tax for Fiscal Year
1989/90 to be effective upon passage of the above Ordinance.
Re pectfully submitted,
^-~ ii ~ u I~~~ ~ ~ ~~n
Deputy City Manager
JBF:de
Attachments 1
1 ~~
RESOLUTION NO. ( - J/V
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP T:'.E CIT'i OF
RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE
RESULTS OF A "HELLO-FOOS COMMVNITY FACILITIES
ACT OF 1902" SPECIAL TA% AND BOND AVTHORIZA-
TION ELECTION
WHEREAS, the PITY COUNCIL of the CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, (hereinafter
referred to ae the "legielat ive body of the local Agency"~, hoe pray Souely declared
fits intention and held and conducted proceedi.-.ga relating to the levy of special
taxes to pay fot certain public capital facil itles and certain additional public
services and iaeuance of bonds to be secured by each epeci al taxes in a community
f ac it it iee diet rlct, ae authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the
"Mello-Roos Community Pacilit iea Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, oiv ieion
2, Title 5 of the Gove cnment Code of the State of California, ea ld Community
Fac Ll itiee District being referred to ae COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0. 8A-2
(hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and,
WHEREAS, said legislative body did call for and order to be held an election to
submit to the qualified electors of the Diatrict a combined propoa it ion to authorize
the levy of special taxes, incur a bonded indebGedneee secured by a spec lal tax
levy, and to establish an appropriations limit in the Dietrlct; and,
WHEREAB, at ~th to time said election hoe been held and the meaeu re voted upon and did
receive the favorable 2/3's vote of the qualified electors, and this legiel alive
hndy dose desire to declare the favorable results of the elect Lon in accordance with
the provle ions of the Elections Code of the State of Celiforn Le.
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the above rec h ale are all true and correct.
SECTION 2. That this legielat ive body hereby receives and approves the CERTIFICATE
OF ELECTION OPPI CIAL AND STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST, ae submitted by the
Election OEf Lc la 1, ea id Statement nett Ln9 forth the number of votes cant
in the election, the meaeura voted upon, and the number of votes given
for and/or ag ain et the meaeura voted upon. A copy of said cart lE icate
and Statement fie attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", referenced and eo
incorporated.
SECTION 3. That the city Clerk le hereby directed, par au ant to the provisions of
the Elections Code of the State of California, to enter Ln the minutes
the resu lie of the election as set Eorth in ea Ld STATEMENT OE VOTES
CAST.
APPROVED antl ADOPTED this day of __ _ , 1989.
ATTEST
MAYOR
CITY OP RANCHO CVCAMONGA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY CLER% / U
CITY VF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
cenrulcATE Gr ElecxxoN orrxclu
AND STATElBSIIT Or VOTES CAST
STATE OF CALIPOANIA )
COVNTY OP SAN BBRNAADINO ) ee.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA )
I, BEVERL% A. AUTHELET, ELECTION OFFICIAL OF THE CITY OF RANC110 CUCAMOHGA, CCVHT.Y OF
SAN HEANARDINO, STATE OP CALIPORNIA, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that pursuant to the
prov to ions of Section 5332fi of the Government Code and Divie lon 12, comm¢ncing with
Sect ion 17000 of tha Elections Code of the State of California, I did canvass the
returns cE the vot ee cast et the
CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2
SPECIAL MAILED BALLOT ELECTION
in said Ctty, held June 27, 1989.
I PURTHER CERTIFY that this St atament of Vot ac Caet shows the whole number of votes
cast in said Diat rict In said Clty, and the whole number of votes cast for the
Meaeura in said Distr lct Ln eeid Clty, and the totals of the respective columns and
the totals as shown for the Measure are full, true end correct.
TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTES CAST: __ 346
II. TOTAL NUMNER OF VOTES POA
AND AGAINST PROPOSITION A:
346
AGAINST ~
WITNESS my hand and official Seal thLe 26 tF1 day of JDAB , 1989.
E CT ION OFFI AL
CITY OF RANC CVCAHONGA
STRTB OF CALIFORNIA
E%HIeIT "A"
ORDINANCE NO. 3 4 7
ORDINANCE OF THE CZTY COUiJOIL OF THE CZTY OF
RANCHO CL'CAMONG A, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN A COMMVNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONCA, CALIFOANIAr (hereinafter
referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), hoe initiated proceed-
ings, held a public nearing, conducted an election and received a favorable voce
from the quallf led electors relat.inq hti tho levy r+f a epeclal tar in a comm!m ity
far Lllt iee district, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provie ions of the
"Me 13o-ROe9 Community Facil it iee Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Pazt 1, Division
2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (hereinafter referred
to ae the "Act"). This communLCy Fac it it ies District shall hereinafter be referred
to ae COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (hereinafter refs cred to as the
"District"~; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2. Thnt this leglsl et lve body does, by the passage of this Ordinance,
authorize the levy of epeclal taxes at the rate and formula and set
forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, referenced and so Incorporated.
S ECTSON 3, That this legislative body is hereby further authorized each year, by
Recto lotion, to determine tha spec if is special tax rate and amou nc to be
lev Led for the next fiscal year, except that [he special taz zate to be
lev letl shall not exceed that as set forth Ln Exhibit "A", but the
=e.:...>. ..>~ , sy .~.,.e,, e~ a ..,.er .awe.
SECTION Q. Propert lee or em it lee of the State, Federal or other local governments
shall, except act of herari ee provided in Section 53317.3 of the Government
Code of the State of California, be exempt Erom the above-referenced and
a pprovetl special tax.
SECTION 5. The proceeds of [he above out hcrized and levietl special tax may only be
used to pay, Ln whole or in part, the costa of the followLng, Sn the
following order of priority:
A. Payment of principal of and int er set on any outstanding as thorized
bonded indebtedness.
D. Ne ceeeary replenlahment of bond reserve funds or other reserve
C. Payment of costa and expen see of authorized publ LC far ll Lt iee,
servtcee, and incidental expenses pursuant to the Aci.
D. Repayment of advances and loans, act appropr lets.
The proceeds of the epeclal tax eha 11 be levied only eo long act needed
for its purpose, and she 11 not be used for any other purpose.
~W
SBCTION b. The above authorized special tax shall ba collected in the same manner
ae ordinary atl valorem taxes are collected and shall be subject to the
same penalties and the same procedure, sale and lien priority in ce ee of
delinquency ae ie provided for ad valorem taxes.
SECTION 7. The above authorized special tax shall be secured by the lien imposed
pursuant to Sect lone 3114.5 and 3115.5 of the Streets and Highways Code
of the State of California, whLch lien shell be a continuing lien and
shall secure each levy of the spec iai tax. The lien of the special tax
shall continue in force and effect until the special tax obligation ie
prepeid, permanently satisfied end cancelled in accordance with Sect icn
53346 of the Government Code of the State of Califarn la or until the
special tax ceases to be levied by the Legielat ive body of the local
Agency in the manner provided in Section 53330.5 of said Government
Code.
SECTION 7. TAie Ordinance ie adopted under the specific authorization of Section
53360 of the Government Code of the State of CalifornLa.
SECTION R. The City Cletk shell sign thi0 Ordlna nce antl aha 11 cave0 the same to be
puDlls hed wiihtn fifteen X15) days after rte passage at least once in
[he DAILY REPO RTr a ne wapaper of general circ4lat ion publie hed and
circulatetl in this City.
INTRODUCED AND PIAST RRAD at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, on 1989;
AND THEREAFTER ADOPTED at a regular meet Lng of the City Council of the City of
~.e ~~ ... .. .........~i ..yur moo....,. •. , ua.v .n. ~u ny _ ii6ir Ly Ultl
follovrl^g vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ATTESTI
CITY CLERK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ ^
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~QJ
CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA
COMMVNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-3
EXHIBIT "A"
The Resolution of Intention re fete to thin Exhibit for an explanation of the rate
and method of apportionment of the Special Taxes eo as to allow each landowner or
tee Ldent within the proposed Community Facilit iea District to set imate the max irnum
am cunt that would be requiretl for payment for euoh landowner's or resident's
property.
SPECIAL TAE "A" - PCBLIC FACILITIES
PA0PERIR GTEU0RIE3
There are two categor iee of property subject to the levy of Special Tax "A", wh LCh
are identified as follows:
7. OEVELOPED PROPERTY All property itlentif ied ae a single Tax Aeeeseor'0 parcel
for which property a building permit has been issued ae
of Hay 31 of any year.
2. UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY A11 other property, ezclud Lng property which, ae of the
date of the election to authorize the levy of Special Tax
"A", is: ~i) ownetl by a public ¢nt ity; (il) owned by a
requ latad public vtil Lty and being ut liized far trana-
mieelon or distribution Pu rpoeae; or (iii) zoned a9 oper.
TAE IN6 CLA93IPIGTI0118 AED
MAEIMVN SPECIAL TAE "A" MTLS
The Gex ing cl as eif icat ions for the above Property Categories and the mex imam autho-
rized Spacial Tax "A" rates for Eiecel year 3989-1990 are ae follows:
TA%iNG CLASSIFICATION MA%fNUM TAE RATE
1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY
A. Residential Claee I 5 1,037 per year
(More than 3,590 square feet of
d«elliDq unit livlnu area
B. Residential Claee II $ 768 pec year
(J, 077-3,589 square feet of
dwell ing unit living areal `
0. Resident Lal Claea III $ 576 par year
(2,566-.3,076 equ ere f~9t of
dwelling unit livl n9 areal " ' (~(~
TAXING CLASSIFICATION
D. ReeLdont lal ClBee IV
(2,308-2,563 square feet of
dwelling unit living area) +
E. Residential C18ee V
(2,051-2,307 square feet of
dwelling unit Living area)
F. Residential Claae VI
(Lees than 2,051 equate feet of
dwelling unit living area) "
c. commercial or industrial property
MAXIMUM TAX RATE
$ 461 per year
$ 384 per year
$ 269 per year
S 2,030 pez acre per year "`
2. UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY
All Undeveloped Property
$ 2,400 par acre per year "`
The square footage of dwelling unit living area shall mean the equate footage
of internal living apace, exclusive of garagre and other etructu tee not usetl
ae Liv inq space, as shown on the building perm ir(e) Segued far the dwelling
unit.
•• T.he acreage of a mmmerc lei or in duetrial preperty shall mean the gross
acreage exclusive of any acreage dedicated or offered far dedication to a
public agency.
`"` The acreage cf an Undeveloped Property shall be the gross acreage exclusive of
any acreage dedicated ur offeratl for dedLcaG ion to a public agency.
H61T100 OF APP0RTIOENEII'1' OF SPECIAL TAl[ "A"
Special. Tax "A" shall be lev led annually on all taxable property within one of the
above identified Property Categorise eo long ae Special Tax "A" revenues are
neceaeary ^_o pay authorized ezpeneee of the Community Facilitlee District related to
the financing of authorized public facilities, which may include, without llmita-
tlon, payment of debt service on any bonded Lndebtednees of the common lty Fac llitlee
Dist tic t; Kepleniehment of any requ !red reserve fund for any such bonded lndebted-
neea; footling of any required sinking fund necessary to pay for future public faclli-
tiea or debt service; or direct payment for public feel! It SOS ("CFD Expenses^).
The annual levy of Special Taz "A" shall De apportioned ae follows:
STEP 1: The Community Facilit lee OLateict shall eBi !mete [he amount o[ CFD
Expan see which must be paid for from Special Tnx "A" revenues collected
durl ng the Flecal Yeer for which the Special Tex "A" levy le to be
estab lie had (the ^Requlred Spec lal Tex "A" Aevenue").
I
STEP 2: That equal percentage of the Special Tax "A^ rate, not to exceed 91\ of
the maximum authorized special Tax "A" rote, applicable to ell Developed
Property Taxing Cl ae elf scat ions neceeeary to ganerete Spacial Tax "A"
revenue In the Flacal Year of the levy equal to the Required Special Tax
"A^ Revenue fo[ such Fiscal Year shall be levied on all Developetl
Property.
STEP 3: If additional Special Tax "A^ revenuea ate et til necessary to generate the
Required Spacial Tax "A" Revenue, that percentage of the maximum autho-
rized Special Tax ^A^ rate applicable to all Undeveloped Property necee-
eary to generate such additional Spec iel Tax "A^ revenue shall he levied
on all Undeveloped Property.
STEP 4: If additional Special Tax ^A" revenuea are still neceeeary to generate the
Required Special Tax ^A" Revenue, that equal percentage of the maximum
authoriz ed Spacial Tax "A" rate applicable to ell Developed Property
Taxing Claeelficetione neceeeary to generate each additional Special Tax
"P" revenue shall be levied on all Developed Property.
STEP 5: IE add it Lonel Special Tax "A" revenuea are eL ill neceeeary to generate the
Required Special Tex ^A" Revenue, the Community PecLlLt tee DLetrlct shell:
A. compare (lj the special Tax ^A^ rata which would De levied on each
Developed Property combining STEP 2 and STEP 4 above with (LS) the
product reeu lung Erom multiplying the square footage of the Developed
Property times the Baee Raximum Special Tax "A". The Beee Max imam
Special Tax "A" means an amount equal to $0.054 per square Eoot of the
lot or parcel.
e. If the product deer rl bad Ln (Li) above exceeds the Spec lei Tex "A'•
rata dwacri bed In tll ahn... •... ..... ,._.._•..__. ....__. .. .. _
Y
Facil itLee District shall Lncreaea "the Special "Tar ^A",rata levied yon
each such Developed Property in aquel percentages up to the rate net
to exceed the product described Sn (lij above neceeeary to ganerete
the additional Spacial Tax "A" revenuea to equal the Required Special
Tax "A" Revenues.
Notwlt hetanding the foregoing, the minimum Special Tax "A" which shall be levLed on
all texablo properties withir. the Community Pac111t1es OSStcLct each Fiscal Year
shall be:
DEVELOPED PROPERTY: $ 1.00 per dwelling unit Eor reeidsntial uses
$ 1.00 per acre for commerc lal/industrial uses
pync ;rvynevn .~.^PERTYv $ i.00 oar inr nr pa rrwl
• e ~
X90
SPECIAL TEE "B" - ADD ITIOEAL POLICE SERVICES
All Developed Property she 11 be eubj act to the levy of Special Tax "B". The maximum
authorized Special Tax ^B" rates for fiscal year 1989-1990 are as Eollowe:
TAXING CLASSIFICATION MAXIMVM TA% RATE
1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY
A. Reg Ldent Sal Claee I 5 432 pet year
(More than 3,590 square feet of
dwelling unit living area) +
B. Ree ident ial Claee 22 5 320 per year
(3,077-3,569 square feat of
dwelling unit living area)
C. Residential Claea III $ 240 per year
12,664-3,07fi equate feet of
dwelling unit lLving area) +
D. Resident lal Cleea IV 5 192 per year
(2,308-2,563 square feet of
dwe Ll ing unit living area) +
E. Rae ldent ial CLaes V 5 lfi0 per year
(2,051-2,307 aquas feet of
dwelling un It living etas) +
F. Rae Lde nt ial Class VI $ 112 per year
(Lase than 2,051 square Eeat of
dwelling unit livLng area) +
G. Commer clal or indu atrial property 51,000 per acre par year +•
The maximum annual Special Tax ^H" rates shall be subject to eecalat ion each July 1
commencing July 1, 1990, at a rate not to exceed four percent (49) per year.
Spec Sat Tax "B" shall be levied annually eo long as Special Tax "B" Revenues are
necessary to pay Eor addLtlonel police eery ices necessary to serve the properties
located within the DteLrLct.
The °Report" of the special Tax Coneultnnt, to be approved as a pnrt of the record
upon the conclusion of the public heeri ng pertaLning to the Eormet ion of the
Community Facillt Les District, shall sat forth euppLmentary detail^ pertaining to
khe Rate end Method of Apport lonment of the Spacial Tax "A" end "B" and shall
provide controlling gu Ldance in the Lnterpretet ion and lmplemeni at ion of thLe Rate
antl Method of Apport lonmsnt.
•+++++
l9~
RESOLUTION NO. ~~~ I
RE9OLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AVTHOAIZING
PRELIMINARY ISSllANCE OP BONDS OF A COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA (hereinafter
referred to ae the "leglelatlve Dody of the local Agency") hoe heretofore undertaken
proceedings and declared the necessity to issue bonds on behalf of a Community
Facil it iee DietrLct pursuant to the terms and prow ielone of the "Mello-Roos Cnamni_
n ity Facilit Lee Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Pert 1, Divtelon 2, Title 5 of the
Government Code of the utate of California. 5a id Community Fac llities District is
designated and known as COMMUNITY FACILITIE9 DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (hereinafter referred
to as the "Dietr ict"~; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to law an election was held and the following propoeit ion was
approved by more than 2/3•e of the vo!ers voting at said elect ton:
PROPOSITION A
CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONCA, COMNUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
NO. 8E-2, AVTHORIZATION TO INCUR BONDED IND£ETEDNE99
AND AUTHORIZATION FOR SPECIAL TAX LEVY
Shall Community Fecllit iee District No. 88-2, City of
Rene ho Cucamonga, be authorized to 1) incur a bonded
indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $4,000,000.00,
to be paid by special taxes ae established by the
Diatr Lch, with interest retee not exceed Lng the maximum ~ ~ ~
author Lzed by law at the Hm. ,.f :m~, a..... fi;;. y-c ~ ..,., i I
the construction, acqu ieition end inetallat ion of certain ~
dra lnage and flood control facilities, together with ~ ~
appurtenances antl appurtenant work, inclutling acqu ieition ~ NO ~ ~
where necessary, 2~ to levy special taxes to pay for eaitl ~
fee it it iee and atldit tonal police protection services
and/or any authorized and issued Dondetl Lndebted neea, and
3) set ablish an Article XIIIB appzoprlat ions limit equal
to the mex Lmum authorized special taxes whlr_h may be
levied in any fiscal yearl
and,
WHEREAS, thin ieg ielat ive body now desires eo prel iminar il.y authorize the ie nuance
^f such special tax bonds.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2. 'that the leylelat ive body hereby authorizes the issuance of all epee ial
tax bonds of Community Facil it iee OLet rict No. 88-2. The exact terms
and condlt lone of the La euence of eucA spec lei tax bonds shall be
eubj ect to the prov ie lone of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilit lee Act of
1982", es amended, end such further Reeolut ion or Reaolut tone of
Issuance ae shall ba a/do''pn'Jted by this legle lative hotly.
I
SECTION 3. That Biown R Divan, Bond Counsel, ie hereby authorized and directed to
forthwith file and prosecute to final judgment, an act Lon pursuant to
Government Code Section 53359 end Cotle of civil Procedure Section 860,
et ae~c „ to validate the proceedings pertaining to the formation of the
District, the levy of aut horixed special taxes within said District and
the issuance o£ the epecia7 tax bonds ae authorized herein.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1989.
MAYOA
CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA
STATE OP CALIFORNIA
ATTEST:
CITY CLERN
CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STATE OF CALIFORNiA
I 1
RESOLUTION N0. ~s• ~ O
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CVCANONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ES TABLIS HI NC ANNVAL SPECIAL TA% FOR A
COMMVNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the CITY COVNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI FOANIA, (hereinafter
referred to as the "legislative body"), has in Lt fated proceed ings, held a public
hearing, conducted an election and received a favoreb ie vote from the qualified
electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a community facitit ies district,
all ae author Lzed pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community
Facilities Act of 1992", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Div is Lon 2, Title 5 of the
Government Code of the State of Cal Lfornia. This Community Facilities District
shall hereinafter be re ter red to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES OISTAICT NO. 98-2 (herein-
after referred to ae the "Oistr ict"); and,
WHEREAS, th ie Legislative body, by Ordinance No. introtlu cad on the date of
adopt ton of thLe Reeo lut ion, as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government code
of the State of California, intends to authorize the levy of a special tax to pay
for costs and expo nose related to said Community Pac it it ies Dietr ict, and this
legielat L:e body La desirous to eetabl Lah the specific rate of the special tax to be
collected for the next fiscal year.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SACTION 1. That the above recitals ere all true and correct.
SECTION 2. i'h et the epecif Lc rate and amount of the npeclal tax to be collected to
pay for the coats and expenses for the next fiscal year X1999-1990) for
hhe efnron,-nd Mnr.ir~ .n hn.ob.. an~o.m:..nn e..d :,.b._.a __ ___
forthrin the at<ached, referenced and incorporated ExhibLtF^A".
SECTION 3. That the rate ae set Forth above does not exceed the amount to be
authorized by Ord inence No. of this leg islet ive body, and is
not In excess of that ae previously approved by the qualified electors
of the Dietri.at.
SECTION 4. That the proceeds of the special tax shall be ..~~,. ..c Pay, in whole or
in part, the coats of the following, Ln the fol lgWing order of priority:
A. Payment of principal of and interest on any out et ending authorized
bonded indebtedness;
s. Necessary replenishment of bo ntl reserve fu nde cr other reserve
C. Payment of costa and expenses of authorized public facilities and
publLc eerv ices.
D. Repayment of advances and loans, Lf appropriate.
The proceeds of the spec lal taxes eha 11 6e used ae set forth e6ove, and
shall not be used for any other purpose.
~9s
SECTION 5. The special tax shall be collectetl in the same manner as ordinary ad
ve}orem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same
penalties and same procedure and sale in eases of any delinquency for
ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector ie hereby authorized to deduct
reasonable adminLetrat ive co eta incurred in collecting any Bald special
tax.
SECTION 6. All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilit Sea
District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund.
SECTION 7. The Auditor of the County is hereby tlitected to enter Ln the next County
aeeeasment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot oc
parcel of land affected in a apace marked ^public improvement e, special
tax" or by any other suitable design et ion, the Lnstallment of the
spec lal tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is
made to the attached Exhibit "A".
SECTION 8. The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection
per Lod, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the
amount and/or amounts of such epee Lal tax installments, interest,
penalties and percentages eo collected and from whet property collected,
and alao provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense
of making any each collection.
SECTION 9. 2h is Resolution shall become of fec[ive upon the adoption of Ord lnance No.
APPROVED end ADOPTED this day of _ _ _r 39B 9.
MAYOR
CITY OP RANCHO CVCAMONCA
STATE OF CAL IPORN IA
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
19 (v
CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2
EXHIBIT "A"
The Reeolut ion of Intention refers to thin Exhibit for an explanation of the rate
and method of apportionment of the Special Taxes so as to allow each landowner or
resident within the propoeed Community Facilities District to estimate the maximum
amount that would be required Eor payment for such landowner's or resident's
property.
SPBCIAL TAE "A" - PVBLIC PACI LITIBE
PAOPBRTY CATEGORIES
There are two categor iee of property subject to the levy of Special Tax "A^, which
are ldent if Sed ae foilowe:
1. DEVELOPED PROPEATY All property identif ietl ae a single Tax Assessor's parcel
for which property a bu ildinq permit has been issued as
of May 31 of any year.
2. UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY AL1 other property, excluding property which, ae of the
date of the election to authorize the levy of Special Tax
"A", ie: 1il owned by a public entity; (ii) awned by a
regulated public utility and being utilized Eor trane-
miseion or distribution pu rposee; or (iii) zoned as open
TAILING CLASSIPICATIONS AND
NAE IMUN SPECIAL TAE "A" RATES
The tax i,ng rises Lf icationa for the above Property Categories and the maximum autho-
rized Special Tax "A" rates for fiscal year 1989-1990 are ae follows:
TAXING CLASE I'.CATION MAXIMUM TAX RATE
1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY
A. Resident Lal Class I 5 7,OJ7 per year
~MOre Chan 3,590 square Eeet of
dweiling ~n.,. ...1nq acesi
e. Rea ident lal Claee IS S ]68 per year
(7,07]-J,5U9 square feet of
dwelling unit livLng area) a
c. Rae Ldential CLase Iti 5 576 per year
(2,564-3,076 equ era feat of
dwelling unit livLng eree) " '
TA%I NG CLA53IFICATION
0. Realdential Cleee IV
(2,308-2,563 square feet of
dwelling unit lLVing area)
E. Aeeidentlel Cleee V
(2,051-2,307 aquace feet of
dwelling unit living area)
F. Rea ident Lel Cla9e VI
(Lase than 2,051 equate feet of
dwelling unLt living area) "
G. Commercial or induet rial property
MAXIMUM TAX RATE
S 461 per year
S 304 per year
5 269 per year
$ 2,030 per acre per year ••
2. UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY
All Undeveloped Property
S 2,400 per acre per year ++"
• The equate footage of dwelling unit living area shall mean the equate footage
of Lnternal living apace, ex clue ive of garages and other at ructurea not used
ae iiving apace, ae shown on the Lu ildleg permil;e) iaauad for the dwell irg
unit.
•" The acreage of a commercial or indu at rial property shall mean the gross
acreage exc lueive of any acreage dedicated or offeretl for dedlcat ion r,c a
public agency.
"*• The acreage of an Undevalopetl property shall be the gross acreage exc Luaive of
any acreage dad Lc aced or offered for dad icatlon to a public agency.
N6TFIOD OP APPORTIONl03T O! SPECIAL TAE "A"
Spec Sal Tax "A" shall be levied annually on all taxable property wit hln one of the
above Stlen[Lfied Property Categoc iee eo long ae Special Tax "A" revenues are
neceaeary to pay authorized expenses of the Community Fecil Ltlee District related to
the financing of author Lzed public Eacillt iee, which may include, without lLmlte-
tlon, payment of debt eery ice on any bonded indebtedness of the Common Lty Facilit iee
D iet rict; replanLehment of any required reserve fund for any such bonded indebted-
nea~; fu nding cf any requ Lred sin king funtl neceaeary to pay Eor future public Eacili-
tie9 or debt service; or direct payment for public Eac it it iee ("CFD Expeneae"~.
The annual levy of Special Tax "A" Snell be apportioned ae follows:
STEP 1: The community Facilit iee Dletrlet shall set Lmete the amount of CFD
Expenses which moat be paid for from Special Tex "A" revenues collected
during the Placal Year for which the Spec Lal Tax "A" levy le to be
eetabliehetl (the "Required Spec lal Tax "A" Revenue").
I ~ V
STEP 2: That equal percentage of the Special Tax "A" rate, not to exceed 918 of
the maximum authorized Special Tax "A" rate, applicable to all Developed
Property Taxing Classifications necessary to generate Epec ial Tax "A^
revenue In the Fiscal Year of the levy equal to the Required Spacial Tax
"A" Revenue for such Fie cal Year shall be levied on all Developed
Property.
STEP 3e If additional Special Tax "A" ravenuea are still neceeeary to generate the
Required Special Tax "A" Revenue, thnt percentage of the maximum autho-
rized Special Tax ^A" rate applicable to all Undeveloped Property neces-
sary to generate such additional Special Tax "A" revenue shall 6e levied
on all Vndeveloped Property.
STEP d: If addlt toast Special Tax "A^ ravenuea era et 111 neceeeary to generate the
Required Spacial Tax ^A^ Aevenue, that equal percentage of the maximum
authorized Special Tax "A" rote applicable to all Developed Property
Taxing Claeeif lcat lone neceeeary to generate such addit tonal Special Taz
"A" revenue shall De levied on all Developed Property.
STEP 5: If additional Special Tax "A" revenues are still neceeeary to generate the
Required Spec lal Tax ^A^ Revenue, the Commu airy Pac it it lee District shall:
A. Compare )i) the special Tax "A^ race whteh woultl be levied on each
Developed Property combinl rq STEP ~ and STEP 4 above with iii) she
product reeu lting free mul[iplying tt.e square footage of the Developed
Property tl.mee the Baee Maximum Special Tax "A^. The Baee Maximum
Special Tax "A" means an amount equal to $0.054 per square foot of the
tot or parcel.
B. IE the product described Ln iii) above exceeds the Spec Lal Tax "A"
rate described in 1 i 1 xhnve f.,r a v ne..o~...,oa o.,...e.f.. ...., ,. _
Facilltlee District shall increase the Spec lal Tax "A^ rate levied on
each such Davelopetl Property in equal percentages up to the rate not
to exceed the product described in iii) above neceeeary to generate
the addit tonal special Tax ^A^ revenues to equal the Requ Lred Special
Tax "A" Revenues.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the minimum special Tax "A'• which shall be levied on
all taxable properties within the Community Fecilit ice Dletc ict. each Fiecel :ear
shall be:
DEVELOPED PROPERTY: $ 1.00 per dwelling unit for resident tai uses
$ 1.00 per acre Eor commercial/lnduetrlal uses
ttpnxggLnocn o.,__ ~„~
$ 0 per lot o~ uarcei
199
9RECIAL TA7( 'B" - ADDITIONAL POLZC6 SEAVICBS
All Developed Property shall be eubj act to the levy of Special Tax "B". The maximum
authorized Special Tax "B^ rates for fiscal year 1989-199G are as fol'_owe:
TAXING CLASSIFICATION MAXIMUM TAX RATE
1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY
A. Res ident val Class I 5 432 per year
(Mare than 3,590 square feet of
dwelling unit living area) *
B. Residential CLaee II $ 320 pax year
(3,077-3.589 square feet of
dwelling unit llvin9 area) *
C. Ree ident ial Claee III 5 240 per year
(2,564-3,076 square teat of
dwelling unit living area) *
D. Resident ial Claee IV $ 192 per year
(7,308-2,563 squ ere feet of
dwelling unit llvLng area) *
E. Residential C1asa V S 160 pac year
(2,051-2,307 square Eeet of
dwelling unit llvin9 areal *
F. Residential Claee VI $ 312 per year
(Lees than 2,051 square feet of
dwelling unit living area)
G. Commercial or industrial property 51,000 per acre per year ~*
The maximum annual Spec Lal Tex "B" rat ea shall be eubj act to escalation each July 1
commenclno July 1, 1990, et a rate not to exceed four percent (4e) per year.
Special Tax "B" shall be levied annually eo long ae Special Tax "B" Revenues are
necessary to pay for addlt Lonal police services necessary to serve the properties
located within the Dietr ict.
The "Report" of the Spec Lel Tax Coneu It ant, to be approved ae a pert of the record
upon the conclusLon of the public hearing pertaining Go the formation oC the
Community Facillt iee Dietr Lct, shell set forth supplementary datall• pertelning to
the Rate end Mec;,od of Apportionment of the 9peciel Taz "A" and "B" and shall
provide rontrolling guidance in the lnterpretat Lon and Lmplementet ion of th la Aate
and Method o[ Apportionment, q OQ
- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
July 5, 1989
~U~MO'~C
v 9
z +
an it
5
Z
F ~ IZ
I>
Mayor, Members of City Council, and City Manager
Joe Schultz. Community Services Manager
PARKS WATCH PROGRAM
RECOMMSNDATION•
To authorize Community Services Department staff to implement
a PARKS WATCH PROGRAM within the City parka in cooperation
with the Sheriff Department.
To authorize the expenditure(s) of an amount not to exceed
$5,000. from the Park Development Fund.
HACRGROUND•
Parks Watch is a crime prevention program which enlists the
active participation of citizens in cooperation with law
enforcement to reduce crime within the park system. This is
__..__. -1 r..--~.. ........ i.-..~..... .... may........,
surrounding City perks, school children, through
presentations at various elementary schools and presentations
to local service clubs. Staff will organize a cohesive and
informed group of citizens to watch "their" parks and
promptly report auspicious activity to the sheriff's office
similar to a Neighborhood Watch Program. This program allows
defensive measures to develop in reducing criminal activity.
The PARK WATCH program will be effective due to an involved
citizenry. The program approaches are varied - but the end
result is the same: a more aware, concerned and involved
citizenry effectively reducing crime in their community.
our two primary goals of implementing PARKS WATCH are:
First, to r?duce vandalism within the park system. ~tandalism
is a menace to park and recreation operation. Its seemingly
irrational causes and destructive results reduce recreation
opportunity and increase park maintenance expenditures.
The second goal of Park Watch ie to create an environment
where people care about each other, their parks end their
community.
~~
PARKS WATCH PROGRAM
July 5, 1989
Page Two
ANALYSIS:
The city can proact to vandalism by implementing PARK WATCH .
We can accomplish a program throughout the City whereby the
Ccmmunity Services Department informs the citizens of our
intent to curb vandalism within the park system 6y meeting
with homeowners associations, service clubs and use the
Graoevine to communicate our message of PARK WATCH.
Appropriate signage will be posted at all parks informing
citizens to WATCH THEIR PARK and report all cases of
suspicious behavior to the sheriff's department. The Citizen
Patrol will also be asked to participate in the program.
The youth, park users and neighborhood residents who era
encouraged to comment on how to prevent vandalism will be
more likely to use PARK WATCH as we intend it to 6e used---
watch their local park--take pride in it--and report people
who abuse "their" facility.
Why Parks Watch?
over a0 million crimes in parks are committed
every year and the number is still growing.
Tha-- ..,. :'t be a _.. -- crc - - -.fi-- --
every -corner, so• oitizen -involvement is
essential to combat this social crisis.
By cooperating with each other and the Sheriff's
department, people can help fight crime in their
community the most effective way -- before it
begins.
IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAN•
To establish the PARKS WATCH program the following will be
implemented:
Signaqe: 35 signs will be ordered that will be
distributed throughout the entire park system
describing that this park is protected by PBBIS~
WATCH•
Printing oP 10,000 brochures describing the PARK
WATCH program to be flistrlbuted to (a) homes
surrounding each park; (b) elementary schools;
(c) local service clubs; (d) home-owners
associations etc. similar to attached.
An active public~~agenees program will be
implemented through the G amevine and newapeper
articles.
PARKS WATCH PROGRAM
July 5, 1989
Page Three
An involved citizenry will reduce vandalism and
other crime within the park system by altering
the Sharift department and citizen patrol.
To tag onto the NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH PROGRAM
within various residential areas and develop a
communication network with the existing
Neighborhood Watch program offered by the Rancho
Cucamonga Sheriff Station.
Enlist community participation and involvement
in a self-help cooperation move against crime.
This can ba achieved by acquainting citizens to
watch their parks and promptly report auspicious
activity to the sheriff's office.
In summary, the goal of Pnrke Watch is to create an
environment where people care about each other, their parks
and their community.
Ree ectfy~]. submitted
,p 1/ i1 A--s
Jd Schultz,
Community se i es Manager
JS:bs
v ~~
_~ ~
V1
1.n ~
~ -v a
~~
a~ ~
E"{
r
C~
u u
N m
y ' a
_ °
u 1°
.- a
_~
'-' y `m
°~ a
L
~ y G
3a..
.`
m e y'p
a E ° E
0 c r E
0
A ~ y V
pq C
y ~ ,.
u
r y
F a.a~
y
s r, ° ~ c
H C o a .~
N O ~ Jt ~ W
~ ~, ~ _ 0 0
Q T y
i,^ q~ r
Ta u
m c ~ a y A
a ;?
U Tt°0 y
i0°' E Nu
o~E u'usa
ro
g o,o'o `o cc~
y
y E ~' " E
E ~ ~ ° m
N N °,t{.~ Tau°.
`~ T C
n C 6° O~ V
?._ O V y
° ~ ~ O 6 ~ ~ q
i^m: a.ooa_
c 9
o °~
a
._ ,~
~ o
m °' o
~ a,
u 3
E ° 5
~": O
E "
N I.n
f.., C
T m
O
.~ a
r
O
u
h ~
N
M M
'^
N
~
°' d
u
[~
~
._ r
O0
a
•:
u
~
~_ ~
°` ~
y
o.
A _
.
u
N u ~
N a
y
y v)
y
°
r
as y W
m,_ m
a
~ o
E
y N y ~
W E
X :: y ii ~ U
„
E `~.
~
C .
U ti
~
O
Ci.
r .~
N
~ ~ "
~
i
U 4.
c, ~,
r,
x ~ ~
~
~
~ ~,
-~ y
ftS
~ ~ O
L1. y
o y
E o
N ~
~ ,~ rn
°
U ~
Ca
~ Q
o0
n ~p U ~n
r $ ~ o ~ ~
'~ c a e a
a ~, ~+~~
c d -~ ~ v
(j E R7 c
L
z
F' E
U o
a cup
~
u Y
>
u '~
ni
' c
m o,; q
O o uE _
E c u E r
VL' ~~ G'Q C' ACC Q
OCU WG
NBoiT Y E ra
.
N
O U' 'r C
V y i.
b inE 9 U
~ q.0 'O
a
m O .V.L VNT~O N
C•
m'j
UVL 0 oi. 6 Y «
..m ~
O
° L
` E T9 C
S
um 6
c
m
°'
"
u
°
° U
` m
as E
u uue co a C u
c ou
E
3.
_ ~ c u m
c W v
my u
;
a
K `
s u
me
m L
o
d
mm
' ..
C' O a o
p
- V
O o
smm
>c
LI
'
•1 e y
= d
O O H O ~. L ~ C y
y
y r V C V y
~. O
V
~ C ~° m T v y ~o T C p 9
m O
. 6 m
m 3
O Y ~
O
~i V Q T
.0 .~ y„y r 'm E
V U u
E C
y .S
'O y y Q' # ,m L y
~ y
a m `
G' V {
cy C VL ?
O >T
Va'9L
~~ O ~
d r
` N
m OV
uy T
V
,
uv ms 9
C
_ 3 .
• cc m
o Jf
c TC
"
y
~
~
u
L
~ y >
s-•~
Na
u e
L
u v
y
5 m u m.. o
u-u :fie PC c m mvc y
L y
v r
m .
.
c
N _
0 0
y
L
~,., ~ ~ u U'~
3a
i m- 41 m w
y m N
E
O
a
W
o
6
w
u
m
O mu tm.'_'u r u ~ 3 V
m
~' y
o~~ua i,m"
~E _ V . -
= ~
~
, yL N€~ m a 8 '
8 c
n m c c c: aLODU_ ~
'
W '
~
W a y u u c ~
3 '- ^ o ,o o u
> E o• y
u cs bi ~ $ m ~
~ u
m N
u u
x u v ~' ._ t' C o >
' .c ue ue ~- =
O ~ ry L L,
b
E p V
~
U V L
G3 K g U V L
4]=^ U m y .~ ({] 04 V V K m Y
' m E E ~ m .-
.+u •-m c smu ^E vC
S~mumZ ~ ~ q q U UU
e
~ r, y ~ iO v o e u
y
c m
m _
°
c u °
' c ~ ~
uc ~ 10 m ..x
V c y p L O G Y 6 C
u m ` y
e t
3 c U
F u T Y
o y ~ ` °o
c m u w ° c ~` ~
m '>.W'
' 6 L ~a OpY Cy 6 m L.. o '= m0 a
E _
=
` 3Y
~
m
° ev omoo
u a v> a ~~'
~ eL 'g2
U
~
u ..
`o ~
o ..
m
a
p
'y L
o c
a2
m u 'o
m
m
u
c
m
e °'
t°
o~
o
C7 ~ 3 U
L J m V u b y _
y A O
r O m ~ C L R L m V O
m
c C m $r ma -
EE " ; m" ~ •E Z
ay
v m u m V
0 k~ 6 Y L m m G G'
N 0 9 C O C m ~ IO
Q
. ' . _ Z C N . O
_ Q
_ ~ e j u~ a E o
L c c•`u c o.c sue y y0~ uS um v m G~ t >.,
y c o E.l a u o o =t
. uu a cr 'a c rv ev
O
~ V V
V U y 9
h O 6
c 3
V c y>
p m u :~
L .• ~ a
v0 C
~C u O
V p, m
n
v
:
° C
3 T
Qu` t
` .~ ,., N y > p
u
~
iv
m
a
o
>
o
m>.°
a°
¢vm
a
<u
.-°,c
v°~'
Uv'
V V C
9 6L m
'
E 8
'
O o u o 8 c' ~ ~1 ,
'„~ ~
r u m .~ _ u ~ V E V ++ 1 ~~
7 v
- o c ~` ~ ti u ~ p o Y Q it y''k..
U ~" Ee mEc ° ~ u
E L
.
u B
-y
e0
u
u n =
~
V T
~' y E
v ,
dA 1
y Z' u 3 A '
° u u ~' ~~
V m -
m i' ~
1
0+ ='t "'._ E
uo3. Y . m r ~'- u
a
' E y >
C
YU r ~'c E aN
°'-
° Vy'/~ ~1'~ ~
~
{ ~ 1.
~ L
~
L p U
V ~ E.. ec
-
m V m
O E ~
{> E U
a
~ C
R a..o
-
6L. C LYY y V
1U
O ~
'1
$
'
!
`
.
'
• '= O V
~ Ft p
O T C V
V
°
> V
uu
°o
u m V
(J V m m
$a OE=m u• u 6 H
!
~
'~~
`~ 6
u
3
E°n°
uZ`3 a
E~
u°o y
e"
u
a~`m 'n~~eE~m6 ~
`h 1ti,~~ 1
t7
r y~'V V9 Y> >~~ m
p~>.~ .
TV ODO O ~
700.tO~p VluOWCp
y ~V~~~ QOM ~y./'1 YM
, V ~
i
"~ y 00~ O "
m O V m F' O C qi~.. E .C UfAU a!. }'NG3{L Vl
a
ca°9 ~ • 1 3 ;
• •
~ •A~~~~A~~~•
- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
Date: July 5, 1989
~q C~~CnMO
t` ~9
f
a a
~~ iT
.,' x
F "~ ~ 2
., a
19;
To: Mayor, Members oP City Council, and City ~l anager
From: Joe Schultz, Community Services Manager ~~
By: Dave Leonard, Park Project Coordinator
Subject: Approval of Name Change for Don Tapia Park
RECOMMSNDATIO
City Council accept the recommendation of the Park and
Recreation Commission and change the name Don Tapia Park to
Don Tiburcio Tapia Park.
HAC%GRODMD•
A ten member community based design committee selected to
redesign Creekside Park suggested the name for the park be
changed. The committee recommended the name Don Tapia Park.
The Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the name and
suggested the name be Tiburcio Tapia. Planning Commission
ouyycb~av DVII 1lLLLL1.r1V 1¢(JlY C61R GALL lLLb IdLK YIIY XCUL'tlaC1 Uf1
Commission suggested Alta Vista for the relationship of the
park to the streets Alta Cuesta and Valle Vista Drives.
On May 17, 1989 City Council approved the name Don Tapia Park
in conjunction with adoption of the redesign concept
developed by the Community Design Committee. Subsequent to
this action, the name was questioned in regard to the proper
use of Lhe surname (See attachment). Tha Park and Recreation
Commission reviewed the letter and concurred that the park
name should be changed. They recommend Don Tiburcio Tapia
Park.
RespeAtful~ly su/bmitted,
~rK ~-~~
Jo Schultz
C munity Se i s Manager
JS: DL:bs
Attachment: Latter from Mr. Charles S. Miller
~~
Charlu S. MNkr
7781 Valle Vtrra Dr.
Cucama7ga, CA 91730
'x712+. nn., S•ta.,i
//3/eJC ~ 8'C 7
/K[L.+or~.c ~+t4rm.yy,~ ~f~ X177 5 L
y? we7xd c.. X47 ~ ?r~..7- ~ oorle ~j w«i=. abo
_•tlu.; ~ O.T CPJ...~n~..e '~,.ne Q~N.a4.Y.t ..zxe 6fearx._ e~
.~~.~.r ~ ~,..,n,,. erri.,.~,., .Q..r--z~ r,a~.. ~ ~~.. ra~„~. --
h. ar.,~v»~uaa.. ~r{^~+Cg..?d -be y/Jeh Ti..Gtrrr, ~i~o~.o. aL
lr,enaE.. , ~ c~ c.ro~, ~,~ Talrac,.d ~.,j~ " Qo,.t `a.....r
~o ,r~+r, Cj~cu~b./~- de tic- Ma„e%a.. ~~ n/)- ~~r,, d¢. ?.~. Ma-„plc.. ~~i
C~-Qc,.•.z't w•Y ,Sc; D.P.t.etiR~~J/~ Ste, LJc+~i,., Uw..c%..te a,~t .4.c n~ ,
~/ ~~•:, h,ua crtzle.r ,~..7L t i4~wT•n, 1~ ~.,~ /27n.~Pr- a+r(
l+f [reatsn ~rysq. m:pue..~ -~'wa~ r...~1L~^+c~~ry A=~.7~•'a+'~O+c1
.Z4h.cl,~tt-[a a ''/o~•., Tj6~ /"w+h ",A~.a,~/ -~'nt/t.:,. .
c - :; - . .
city c,~~; ..~ .~. ,.... ~.,~,,:t~, ,
,r ,
w ~N
7~Sr9~Niil~~tilZ~3~4l.,6
---- CITY OF RANCHO CI;CAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 5, 1989
70: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brad Boiler, City Planner
BY: Jeff Gravel, Assistant Planner
SU&IECT: ANNE%ATION 89-03 - BLACKMON HOMES, INC. - A request to
approve a ax evenue xc ange for annexation
proceedings (LAFLO 2547) between the County of San
Bernardino and the City of Rancho Cucanonga for
approxinwtely 25 acres of vacant land located at the
northeast corner of Highland and Rochester Avenues -
APN: 255-152-01, 02, 03, 04, and 18.
I. RECOMI/ENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the attached
eso u on approving the Tax Revenue Exchange between the County
of San Bernardino and the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
II. BACKGROUND: The Tax Revenue Exchange negotiation is a part of the
•annexa on proceedings before the Local Agency fornwtion
Commission for Blackmon Homes Inc., iocated in an unincorporated
area of the County (see exhibit "B"). This annexation is
scheduled far public hearing before the Local Agency Formation
Commission on July 19, 1989. Approval of the Tax Revenue Exchange
by the City and by the County is a vrereouisite of the annexation
proceedings. me tax share formula, for the tax exchange, for
this annexation, has been increased from previous annexations.
Due to recent negotiations between the City and the County, the
City is allowed to collect a higher percentage of tax than
previous years, when annexing property. According to Halt We11s,
County Administrative Analyst, the City and the County negotiated
and drafted legislation earlier this year which will allow the
City to receive 7.54% of the property taxes collected per year,
within the boundaries of the subject annexation. The new level is
approximately 3% higher than the previous annexation tax exchange
agreements. This increase is the product of the "NO and Low"
property tax legislation, SB 1063. This legislation gives cities,
who incorporated during the years of 1977-76, the opportunity to
collect a higher percentage of their property tax. Soon, the City
will collect up to a 7% property tax from all properties within
the City. This will take place over a 7 year period.
Pny special assessment district tax, for example, Light and
Landscaping or Me11o Roos, would oat have an effect on the
property tax received by the City.
PLANNING COIMISJION STAFF REPORT
ANNIXATION 89-03 - BLACKNBN HOMES INC.
July 5, 1989
Page 2
III. CONCLUSION: Adoption of the attached resolution is required to
procee w annexation proceedings for the subtect property.
Re dilly {
/Br d
/// Cit ann~
BB:JG:sp
Attachment: Exhibit "A"
Exhibit "B" - WNnity Map
Resolution
~~o
ANNEXATION TO THE
CITY Of RANCHO CUUMONGA \
LAFC N0.2517
CITY PERCENT IN ANNEXED AREA
7.51% '
TRA S 70008 -
MV f 256,265
REVENUE f 2,503
CHANGE IN CHANGE IN CHANGE IN
BASE YEAR BASE YEAR BASE YEAR
FOR USE IN FOR USE IN FOR USE IN
19868! Lgee~e! t9e66! TOTAL
COUNTY
General Opostions f (116) f (116)
FIooC contra
fI000 ZOM
library (eSI (65)
Iotalcounry: S (181) f (181)
OTHER AFFECTED
AGENCIES
CSA 1170 S (1) f (1)
CSA /70 20NE A I81 (G)
Tobl Afltctld
Agencies:
TOTAL (188} (188)
TRANSFER TO
aTr s lee s Ise
d ~~
EXFNBIT "A•
CITY OF'
RANCHO CUC~MON(~1
PLANNING DIVLSION ~ /~
NO(YiH
ITEM: gMExgTxN1 ePW
TITLE: vlcnrv MAP
EXHIBIT 'B' SCALE 1lQNE
RESOLUTION N0. ~ 1 - ~~ /
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE AMOUNT
OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUES TO BE EXCHANGED BETNEEN AND
AMONG THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDYNO AND THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESULTING FROM THE JURISDICTIONAL
CHANGE DESCRIDED BY LAFCO N0. 2547.
SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
finds and ce~ermi-n-es that:
A. Pursuant to Section 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, prior to the
issuance of a certificate of filing by the Local Agency Formation
Commission Executive Officer, the governing bodies of all local
agencies whose service area or service responsibilities will 6e
altered by a proposed jurisdictional change shall negotiate and
determine by resolution the amount of property tax revenues to be
exchanged between and among such agencies.
B. Except as provided in Section 99.1 cf the Revenue and Taxation Code,
in the event that a jurisdictional change would effect the service
area or service responsibility of one or nwre special districts, the
Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino shall, on behaif
of the district or districts, negotiate any exchange of property tax
revenues.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Board of
Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino have determined the
amount of property tax revenues to be exchanged as a result of the
ioiiowing Jurism ccronai change:
LPFCO N0. 2547 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
reso vel sand-orders that:
A. The negotiated exchange of property tax revenues beMeen the City of
Rancho Cucamonga and the County of San Bernardino, attached hereto as
Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference, resultl ng from the
above described jurisdi cti anal change is hereby approved and
accepted.
The annual tax increment generated in the area subject to the
jurisdictional change and attributable tq the local agencies whose
service area of service responsibilities will De altered by the
proposed Jurisdictional change shall be allocated in future years
pursuant to the provisions of Section 98 of the Revenue and Taxation
Code.
SECTION 3: The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby
directed"-fo-certify to the passage of this Resolution and to cause a certified
copy to be sent to the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation
Commission of the County of San Bernardino.
~l3
ANNEXATION TO THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONW
IAFC N0.2547
CITY PERCENT IN ANNEXED AREA
7.54%
TRA #r 70008
MV S 256,265
REVENUE S 2,503
CHANGE IN
BASE YEAR
FOR USE IN
1988.8!
COUNTY
General Operatiorn f (llb)
Flood Control
Flood Zone
library (65)
l otal County: f (181)
OTHER AFFECTED
AGENCIES
CSA I70 S (1)
CSA +M70 ZONEA (6)
CHANGE IN CHANGEIN
BASE YEAR BASE YEAR
FOR USE IN FOR USE IN
t988-89 19889 70TAL
f (116)
(65)
f (181)
f (1)
(6)
Total Affected
Agencies:
TOTAL (188)
TRANSFER TO
CITY S 186
(188)
S 188
~~~
EXFNBIT 'A"
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
vA1'E: July 5, 1989
To: City Council
FROM: Solid Waste/Recycling Sub-Commit /~/
Pamela J. Wright, Councllmembe~
Deborah N. Brown, Counc ilmembe
SUBJECT: Solid Waste /Aecvcl tna U~ete
RECOMMENDATION
4',.
It ie recommended the City Council adopt the attached resolution establishing
waste reduction goals and a comprehensive waste reduction strategy.
In addition, it ie recoamiended the City Council establish a local env i[o nmental
quality/resource recovery committee.
BACRGAOUND
The Solid Waste/Recycling Sub-committee attended a Local Government COmmi99ion
Recycling Conference on March 30-April 2, 1989. The Local Government Comm iea ion
ie a non-profit, non-partisan membership organization and is made up of Forward
thinking elected oEf icia le from throughout California. Commies ion members are
committed to developing and implementing local solutions to problems of et ate
and national significance. The Local Government Commission serves both cit iea
and counties, and ie directed toward promoting cooperative efforts among all
levels of government.
The purpoee of the Recycling Conference held March 30-April 2, 1989 was to
provide city and county off iciala with epeclf is information regarding what each
city or county can do to tnerease the viability of recycling as a eOlid waste
managoment option in their common it iea. The Conference provided the following
eugge area actrona for eetab liehing the goal of waste reduction and resource
recovery:
1. Introduce and adopt a resolution eetebliehing waste reduction goals
and a comprehensive waste reduction et rategy.
2. Perform a public opinion eutvey of residents and buelneeaee on
rec.Ycl ing.
/~
Solid Waste/Recycling Update
.TU ly 5, 1989
Page TWo
3. Perform a waste composition study to identify recyclable mater is le.
4. establish a local recycling committee or commission.
5. Adopt a zoning ordinance to facilitate the siting of recycling
facll it iee.
6. Hire a consultant to condret a feasibility study or to implement
recycling plan.
7. Hire n recycling coordinator to develop and implement a
comprehensive, integrated waste management plan.
8. Develop a waste reduction strategy with spec if is initiatives, budget
and implementation schedule.
9. Review collection and disposal contracts, rate structure, eol id waste
facility permit a, and ordinances to identify changes needed to footer
recycling.
30. Issue requests Poi proposal Pot curbside recycling (or yard waste
composting or commercial recycling.
11. Implement a procurement policy favoring the purchase of products
containing recycled materials.
12. Review legislative policy guidelines to guide city/county staff in
supporting legielat ion.
The Solid Waste/Recycling Subcommittee recommends adopting the attached
resolution. The resolution eetabliehee actions to move the City of Rancho
Cucamonga ahead Sn establlehing our philosophy for environmental quality within
our community. In addition, the Subcommittee recommends establish ing an
Environmental Resource Recovery Committee. The Committee will help insure the
Council will be made aware of issues in a timely manner.
PSW:DNB:jle
89-298
vl
RE SOLVTION N0. 89- 3 ~-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CCCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABL ISN ING WASTE REDUCTION
GOALS AND ENDORSING A COMPPEHENS IV6 SOLID WASTE
REDUCTION STRATEGY
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes the importance of
preserving limited and increasingly valuable landfill apace, conserving natural
zeaouccea, and protecting the environment; and
WHEPEAS, reducing, reusing, recycling and composting of wastes can
contribute significantly Lo achieving these environmental goals a& part of a
comprehensive integrated waste management system; antl
WHEREAS, AB 1462 requires revie ions of County So11d Waste Management
Plans (COSWMPS) to include a 20t recycling goal and a detailed plan of action
for reaching this goal which will require aggressive recycling efforts by every
city and county in the state; and
WHEREAS, AB2020 has established a network of local recycling centers
throughout the state that have increased the convenience of recycling and
provides an example of how recycling can be expanded at the local level.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
does hereby resolve anA establish the following goals and principles to govern
local solitl waste management activities:
1. Sn1id wa stow aM~~ld wo ...e en _ _
that can contribute to the local economy when reused and recycled;
2. Landfills shoo ld be managed not only to minimize environmental
concerns but also ae a resource to be conserved;
3. The hierarchy of integrated waste management should be applied
wherever possible to foster solid waste options in the following
order of priorities: reduce consumption, reuse ae much ae possible,
recycle or compost materials from waeGee, recover energy values of
wastes, then properly lendf ill the rest;
4. Weetee currently received at lantlf ills should be reduced by at least
20t through recycling by 1994 (or caneletent with the CoSWMP,
whichever ie greater); and
5. As local recycling collection programs increase, the City/County
shall work to stabilize and expand markets for recyclablee by buying
recycled materiels and product e, expanding existing end attracting
new user industries tc manufacture products from recycled malaria ls,
any by supporting appropriate state and Eederal market legia let ion
and programs.
V 1 /
G ~
~~. ~ ~s RANCHO CI.JCM70NGA
o ' _ ~ REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
~ ~ AGENDA
~yy
Adiourned lteetina
June 29, 1989 - 6:00 p.m.
Lions Park Community Center
9161 Baee Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
A• GALL TO ORDER
1. Aoll Call:
august _, Alexander _, Stout , Brown , Wright
B. COMMUNICATIONS PROM TBB PUBLIC
This is the time end place for the general public to address the Redevalapaent
Agency. Bteta law prohibits tae Redevslopasnt Ageacp Eros addressing say issue
not prey iously included oa the Agenda. The Redevalolrent Agency say receive
tastiwny end sat tae natter for s subwquent nesting. Co~uents are !o De
limited to five eiaules per individual.
C_ADVIiATISED PllBLIC HEARINGS
ADOPTION OF PISCAL YEAR 1989 90 OPERA IO L BUDG T AND 91 IS CAL
PLAN.
D. ADJOURNMENT
MEETING TO ADJOURN TO .TULY 5, 1989 AT 7:00 P.N., LIONS PARR COMMUNITY CENTBR,
9161 BASE LINE ROAD, RANCHO CUCAMONOA.
pg. 1
I, Beverly A. Authe let, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby
certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on June
23, 1989, nave my-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953
at 9320-C Baee Line Road.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOP
REDEVELOPMENT AGENC'
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 29, 1989
TO: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency
FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Deputy Director
SUBJECT: PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BUDGET -- FISCAL
YEARS 1989/90 AND 1990/91
RECOMMENDATION : Approve the attached two year
Redevelopment Agency budget.
ANALYSIS : Attached you will find the proposed 1989/90 and
1990/41 Redevelopment Agency budgets. Fund categories that
begin with the digit one (1) represent Administrative and Project
Funds; those categories beginning with the digit two (2) are
restricted ("Pass-Through") accounts subject to Agency agreements;
those beginning with the digit three (3) or four (4) represent special
Trustee Funds which have been established to handle transactions on
either bond or loan nro¢rams which have been established by the
Redevelopment Agency.
Ilow do these funds work?
Tax increment is received by the Redevelopment Agency from the
County of San Bernardino. The Redevelopment Agency, in turn,
places these monies into the restricted Pass=Through Funds according
to the percentages provided by the County Auditor-Contoller's Office.
Funds contained in the Pass-Through accounts are restricted for
specific purposes, or are [ransfered to the Trustee for payment to
debt service nn bonds sold by the Agency in prior years. These
restrcted Pass-Through Funds serve to provide the financing for
such projects as the Regional Facilities Day Creek Project, the
Affordable Housing Program, and the Fire Facilities Program. Luc
Project and Administration Fund accounts operate with ~'~
revenues derived from loans, funds transfers, proceeds of ~
bonds, interest income, and other revenue sources that o
are specifically designated for project implementation. These project
funds offer more flexibility in terms of implementation of programs
established by the Redevelopment Agency, in that they are not
restricted by prior Pass-Through Agreements with other taxing
entities at the time the Project Area was formed.
With the settlement of the lawsuits filed against the Plan
Amendment, the Agency is once again able to receive its full tax
increment revenue generated by the Project Area. This settlement
means that the Agency can now begin to expand its operations to
include additional programs identified in the Redevelopment Plan.
In addition [o the existing programs of Day Creek Regional Facilities,
Regional Shopping Center, Civic/Public Safety Center, and Fire
Protection Facilities, the Agency will be developing an Affordable
Housing Program, funding the construction of the Milliken Avenue
Railroad Undercrossing, Sports Park complex, Library in Central Park,
and the First Phase of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan
Implementation Program. Additional Programs will be under review
to determine the extent of Agency participation.
Respectfully submitted,
Linda D. Daniels, Deputy Director
a
~Q C.VCAMO,~
~, 'F.; G7'Y OF
1 RANCFIO (.lX11MOlVC',A
on o C~IrTrY~ TC~OUNCIL
F- U Z [Yll'~l Vrl.(-1
U >
1977
Adiourned Meatind
June G5. 1989 - 6:00 P.M.
Lions Park Comn~u nity Center
9161 Baae Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
A_ CALL TD ORDEN
1. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag.
2. Roll Ca11:
Ruquet _, Alexander _, Stout _ , Brown , Wright
B. COMMUNICATIONS FROM TAE PUBLIC
This is tAe time end place for the gave ral public to addreae the City Council.
state law prohibits the City Council from addre seivg any issue not previously
incauded on the Agenne. The City Council vap receive testimony avd set the
matter fora subsequent meeting, Comments era to be limited to five mivutes pez
individual.
C. CONSENT CALENDAR
Approval to rescind Resolution Nos. 88-413 and 88-413A and adjust salary
ranges and benefits for employees pursuant to Council policy and employee
group M.O. U. s.
RF.SOLVTION NO. 89-295
A RE SOLOTION OF THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. RESCINDING RFSnLOTION NOB. 88-
413 A[vu e8-41lA ANO ADJUSTING SALARY RANGES AND BENEFITS
FOR EMPLOYEES OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ADVERTISED PVBLIC NEARINOB
pg. 1
P9~ 2
AOOPTTON OF FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 BUDGET AND 1990/91 FISCAL PLAN: ARTICLE pg, 15
XIIIB APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT.
City Councll Agenda -2- June 29, 1989
RESOLUTION NO. 89-296 pg. 16
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATION
LZMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE %II IB OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE
CONSTITUTION POR FISCAL YEAR 1989/90
RESOLUTION N0. 89-297 p9. 17
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THB CITY BUDGET (GAB
TA%, AND OTHER BPECIAL PURPOSE FUNDS, AND ADDITIONAL
APPROPRIATIONS) FOR FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 OPERATIONAL
BUDGET AND 1990/91 FISCAL PLAN
E• CONMUNICATIOSS PROM THB PUBLIC
TAia is the ties and pLCe for the gaasral public to addrus the Citp Council.
State lee prohibiL• the Ciip Council Eros addressing aap issw aot previously
ivcluded oa Lha Agsnda. The City Comcil sap receive testieonp aad set the
utter fora aubaequeat eeetiog. Coosnts are to W 1Litsd to five einute• per
individual.
F. ADJOURMRNf
MBETINO TO ADJONRN TO JULY 9, 1989 AT 7:30 P.M., LIONB PARR COMNVNITY CENTER,
9161 BASE LINE ROAD, RANGED CVCAMONOA.
I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby
certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on June
23, 1989, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953
at 9320-C Case LLne Roed.
- CITY OF RANCHG CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
Date: June 29, 1989
To: Mayor, City Council and City Manager
From; Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director
Subject: ADDPTION OF SALARY RESDLUTION INPLENEN71N6 SALARY AND BENEFIT
C S FOR FISC 4 89
RECpMENDATION•
the City Council adopt the attached resolution implementing salary and benefit
changes for fiscal year 1989/90.
BACK6RDUND•
?he Memorandums of Understanding with all three of the employee groups were
adopted by the City Council at the June 21, 1989, city council meeting.
Additionally, the market equity adjustments were reviewed with the City
Council and have been completed. Adoption of the attached resolution
..~. .._
•~r '...".:C'ti `^`- pr`~~i i+ivii i~f • c i6 rvl Y~iJ wni ui l%IN CI aia llJ ill,J GIIJ illlp ie111e IIL>
the market equity adjustment s41as discussed with the City Council for fiscal
year 1989/90,
Res pe~tfully submitted,
~ i µ/~~
Jim Hart
Administrative Services Director
JH/d ah
RESOLUTION N0. 89-295
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTIONS N0. 88-413
AND 88-413A AND ADJUSTING SALARY RANGES AND BENEFITS FOR
EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has
determined that it is necessary for the efficient operation and management of
the City that policies be established prescribing salary ranges, benefits, and
holidays and other policies for employees of the City of Rancho Cucaronga; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes
that it competes in a marketplace to obtain qualified personnel to perform and
provide municipal services, and that compensation and conditions of employment
must be sufficiently attractive to recruit and retain qualified employees; and
WHEREAS, the revised pay ranges and benefits incorporated in this
Resolution have been reviewed and approved by employees representing City
Council approved employee groups by the approval of Memorandums of
Understanding, in accordance with applicable state and federal laws.
NOW; THEREFORE, AE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows:
SECTION 1: Salary Ranges
ASSTGNIENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES
(Monthly Amounts)
Control
Mi nimun Point Maximum
Class Title Step Amount Step Nraunt Step Amount
OOxX CLERICAL AND ADMINISTRATION
ooxx Clerical
ce 270 1,332 310 1,626 320 1,709
Office Assi <_ta nt 1/ 200 1,471 330 1,796 340 1,888
Records Clerk 290 1,471 330 1,795 340 1,888
Da to Entry Operator 290 1,471 330 1,796 340 1,888
Police Clerk** 285 1,435 325 1,752 335 1,842
Deputy City Clerk 1/ 360 2,086 400 2,547 410 2,677
Sr. Offire Assista~ 1/*** 330 1,796 370 2,193 380 2,305
Public Service Technician 344 1,926 384 2,351 394 2,472
Office SupervisorN 360 7,086 a00 2,547 410 2,677
Pianiiiny Comnissivn Secy6 i/ 360 2,08ti 400 2,547 410 2,677
Disaster Preparedness Tech- 348 1,965 388 2,399 398 2,522
Executive Assistant* 1/ 395 2,484 435 3,033 445 3,188
Records Manager/City ~lerk* 442 3,140 482 3,834 492 4,030
**This classification when assigned to shifts other than day shift shall have an
additional pay of 40 cents per hour.
1/ When acting as Clerk to Council/Commissions S50 paid per night or weekend day
meeting.
Resolution No. 89-295
Page 2
Control
Mi nimum Po int Ma ximum
Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount
fiscal
Cashier 302 1,562 342 1,907 352 2,005
Information Clerk 290 1,471 330 1,796 340 1,888
Account Clerk 302 1,562 342 1,901 352 2,005
Senior Account Clerk 332 1,814 372 2,215 382 2,328
Accountant# 393 2,459 433 3,002 443 3,156
Accounting Technician 347 1,955 387 2,381 397 2,509
Accounting Supervisor. 423 2,856 463 3,487 473 3,665
Financial Analys t# 412 2,704 452 3,301 462 3,470
Risk Management Technician 339 1,879 319 2,294 389 2,411
Business License Clerk 314 1,659 354 2,025 364 2,128
Business License Technician 344 1,926 384 2,351 394 2,472
Business License Supervisor# 374 2,237 414 2,371 424 2,811
Purchasing Assistant 332 1,814 372 2,215 382 2,328
Administrative
Administrative Intern 271 7.72 311 9.43 321 9.91
Administrative Aide# 352 2,005 392 2,447 402 2,512
Personnel Tec hnician# 360 2,086 400 2,547 410 2,677
Administrative Rnalyst# 382 2,328 422 2,842 432 2,986
Administrative RssistantN 412 2,704 452 3,301 462 3,470
Sr. Administrative A55t* 442 3,140 4II2 3,834 492 4,03C
Disaster Prepared. Coord.* 455 3,351 495 4,090 505 4,300
nzvv r,.m„~~ror
Computer Technician 368 2,171 408 2,650 418 2,786
Spec Dist Aide 338 1,869 378 2,282 388 2,399
Spec Dist Tech 368 2,111 408 2,650 418 2,786
Spec Dist Analyst# 419 2,800 459 3,418 459 3,593
Spec Dist Supervisor# 419 2,800 459 3,418 469 3,593
GIS Technician 368 2,171 408 2,650 41S 7_,186
GIS Technician II 393 2,459 433 3,002 443 3,156
Car tog s pher# 419 2,800 459 3,418 46S :,Sy3
GiS Supervisor# 419 2,800 459 3,418 469 3,593
fomp~.iter Operator 338 1,869 378 2,282 388 2,399
Programmer# 419 2,800 459 3,418 469 3,593
Data Base Mgr/P rogramner# 441 3,125 481 3,815 491 4,010
Systems Analys t7ProgrammerR 441 3,125 481 3,815 491 4,010
Data Processing Supervisor* 469 3,593 509 4,386 519 4,611
lOXX COMMUNITY SERVICES
10X% Recreation
Recreation=_sistant 191 5.18 Z31 6,32 241 6.65
Rrao•eation Leader 241 5.65 281 8.12 291 8.53
l nstruc cor/Guard 228 6.23 268 7.61 278 8.00
Assistant Pool Man"a er 256 7.16 296 8,75 306 9.19
Pool Manager ~ 280 8.08 320 9.86 330 10.36
Recreation Coordinator 359 2,076 399 2,534 409 2,664
Recreation Supervisor# 389 2,411 429 2,943 439 3,094
Sr. Recreation Supervisor# 419 2,800 459 3,418 469 3,593
Recreation Superintendent* 449 3,252 489 3,970 499 4,173
Resolution No. 89-295
Page 3
Control
Mi nimum Point Maximum
Class Title Step Amount Ste ~Amount Ste p Amount
i1XX Communit Services
Assistant ark fanner 395 2,484 435 3,033 445 3,188
Associate Park Planner# 425 2,885 465 3,522 475 3,702
Park Projects Coordinator* 455 3,351 495 4,090 505 4,300
Community Services Tech 360 2,086 400 2,547 410 2,677
2XXX PLANNING, ENGINEERING & INSPECTI ON
20XX Plano inu
Planning Aide 271 1.72 311 9.43 321 9.91
Planning Technician 338 1,869 379 2,292 388 2,399
Assistant Planner# 403 2,585 443 3,156 453 3,317
Associate Planner# 433 3,002 473 3,665 483 3,853
Senior Planner* 463 3,487 503 4,257 513 4,475
Principal Planner* 473 3,665 513 4,475 523 4,704
Deputy City Planner* 483 3,853 523 4,704 533 4,94-0
21XX Engineerinq
Junior Engineering Ride 315 1,667 355 2,035 365 2,139
Engineerinq Aide 335 1,842 375 2,248 385 2,363
Engineering Technician 355 2,035 395 2,484 405 2,611
Junior Civit Engineer 399 2,534 439 3,094 449 3,7.52
Landscape Designer# 416 2,758 456 3,367 466 3,540
Assist. Landscape Designer# 386 2,375 426 2,899 436 3,048
Assistant Civil Engineer# 429 2,943 469 3,593 479 3,777
Associate Civil Engineer# 459 3,418 499 4,173 509 4,386
Sem or t,ivii tnginee r^ vo9 3,9%u 329
Traffic Engineer* 489 3,910 529 4,846 539 5,094
Deputy City Engineer* 501 4,215 541 5,145 551 5,408
23XX Inspection
Code Enforcement Tech 330 1,796 370 2,193 380 2,305
Code Enforoement Rep. 2/ 371 2,204 411 2,690 421 2,828
Code Enrorcement Supvl`2/ 401 2,560 441 3,125 451 3,284
Public Works Inspector 2/ 397 2,509 437 3,063 447 3,220
Sr. Pu61ic Works Ins p.N 2/ 421 2,914 467 3,557 471 3,739
Puhlic Workers Engineer* 2/ 479 3,177 518 4,588 528 4,822
Plan Checker# 410 2,677 450 3,268 460 3,435
Counter Plan Check er# 425 2,885 465 3,522 475 3,702
Sr Plan (heck er# 440 3,109 480 3,196 490 3,990
Plan Check Coordinator* 470 3,511 510 4,408 520 4,634
Buiidiny impe~Lur 2/ 3 v
9~ "'3 43^. 2 n5y n~
4 J i liW
Rehab. Sper,i alist# 2/ 410 2,677 450 3,268 460 3,435
Grading Specialist#-2/ 410 2,677 450 3,268 460 3,435
F.l ectrical Specialis t# 2/ 410 2,677 450 3,268 460 3,435
Building Insp. Superv# 3,/ q30 2,958 470 3,611 480 3,796
D eput,y Build inq Off ir.ial* 483 3,853 523 4,704 533 4, 94M1
24 XX Development Administration
Asst RDR Analyst# 395 2,484 435 3,033 445 3,188
Redevelopment Analyst# 425 2,885 465 3,522 475 3,702
Sr. Redevelopment Analyst* 455 3,351 495 4,090 505 4,300
Resolution No. 89-295
Page 4
Class Title
SXXX MAINTENANCE SERVICES
ie rvices
easona rn enance Tech
Maintenance Worker 2/
Street Sweeper Oper~or 2/
Sr. Maintenance Worker 2T
Maint. Crew Supervisor 7/
Mechanic's Helper 2/
Mechanic 2/
Sr iHechanic 2/
Equipment Vefiicle Clerk 2/
Signal & Lighting Tech 2j
Electrical Helper
Pi umbing Helper
S1 XX Maintenance Supervision
in enance uperv sor
Maint. Superintendent* 27
90XX Misceilaneous
rossing usr s
Control
Mi nimun Po int Ma ximum
Step Amount Step Amount Step /mount
231 6.32 271 7.72 281 8.12
322 1,726 362 2,107 372 2,215
332 1,EI4 372 2,215 382 2,328
352 2,C05 392 2,447 402 2,572
382 2,328 422 2,842 432 2,988
322 1,726 s62 2,107 372 2,215
352 2,005 392 2,447 402 2,572
382 2,328 422 2,842 432 2,986
332 1,814 372 2,215 382 2,328
380 2,305 420 2,814 430 2,958
332 1,814 372 2,215 382 2,328
332 1,814 372 2,215 382 2,328
441 3,125 481 3,815 491 4,010
471 3,629 511 4,430 521 4,657
191 5.18 231 6,32 241 6.65
2/ Up 5135 proviQed annually toward purchase of approved safety footware.
~ Denotes Management Classes
# Denotes Supervisory/Professional Classes
***This position may be designated as a lead worker in a division or department when
more than one Senior Office Assistant is assigned and shall have an additional Len
(10) salary code steps (5%) added to salary range.
SECT iON 2: Executive Management Salary Ranges
Class Ti tie
Redevelopment Coordinator
Finance Manager
City Planner
Building Official
Community Services Manager
City Engineer
Admin Services Director
Community Development Oir
Deputy City Manager
Assistant City Manager
City Manager
Control
Mi nimun Po int
Step Prtwunt Step Amount
493 4,050 533 4,944
509 4,386 549 5,355
504 4,278 544 5,223
496 4,111 536 5,019
521 4,657 561 5,685
528 4,822 568 5,887
535 4,994 575 6,096
543 5,197 583 6,344
504 4,278 544 5,223
531 4,895 571 5,976
--$8,!51.00 flat amount--
Executive Managgement employees will be assigned to salary ranges which are no
less than 20% (40 salary code steps) below the control point and no more than
15% (30 salary code steps) above the control point. Actual salaryry within the
range is determined by performance achievement of goals and ob,7ectives, or
far recent appointments, groxth w t~iin the position.
Resolution No. 89-295
Page 5
SECTION 3: Three tiered Management Program
Employees designated as either Professional/Supervisory, Management, or
Executive Management are not eligible for overtime pay, or compensatory time
for working hours over and above the normal daily work schedule. Employees so
designated shall be entitled to all Benefits provided to general employees and
the following:
Professional/supervisory
A. Administrative leave to a maximum of forty hours per calendar
year at the discretion of appropriate supervisor, after
successful completion of six months service within this
classification.
B. Life insurance policy of an additional five thousand dollars.
C. Deferred compensation program of two percent of salary.
Management
A. Administrative leave to a maximum of sixty hours per calendar
year at the discretion of appropriate supervisor, after
successful completion of six months service within this
classification.
B. Life insurance policy of an additional ten thousand dollars.
C. Deferred compensation program of four percent of salary.
Executive Management
A. Administrative leave to a maximum of eighty hours per calendar
year at the discretion of appropriate supervisor, after
successful completion of six months service within this
ciassin cation.
B. Automobile allowance of E250.00 per month if a City vehicle is
not provided.
C. Life insurance policy of an additional thirty thousand dollars.
D. Deferred compensation program of six percent of salary.
SECTION 4: Life Insurance
The City provides f30,000 base coverage of life insurance for all
employees. Employees who want to purchase additional life insurance coverage
with personal funds may do so in 510,000 increments at the city's group rate.
SECTION 5: Sick Leave Buyback
Employees who terminate their city employment after five years of
continuous service and 'nave at least 50z of five years' sick leave accrued on
the books upon termination can sell 120 hours back to the City.
SECTION 6: Safety Footwear
The City will provide E135 annually toward the purchase of safety
footwear for employees required to wear safety footwear as part of their ,joD
responsibilities.
Resolution No. 89-295
Page 6
SECTION 7: Maternity Leave
Female employees are granted up to four months maternity leave for the
birth or adoption of a child. Employees on a maternity leave of absence
without pay will be responsible for the pa ent of medical, dental and optical
premiums to keep the coverage in force during the leave of absence.
SECTION 8: Paternity Leave
Male e~loyees are granted up to 3 days paternity leave for the birth or
adoption of a child. This time is to be charged to sick leave.
SECTION 9: 7uitton Reimbursement
Employees are eligible for reimbursement of up to E950 based on actual
cost as documented by receipts, per fiscal year for costs associated with
attendance of work related classes, or earning credits towards completion of
courses required for the degree, ar courses that employee feels would be
valuable for their overall development at colleges or universities. Approval
for reimbursement must be obtained by the employee's supervisor prior to
taking the course.
SECTION 10: Holidays
The City Offices shall observe the following days. All full time
continuous salaried employees shall be compensated at their reguiar rate for
these days.
(a) January 1 -New Years Day
(b) January -third Monday - Martin Luther King's Birthday. Employees
who wish to celebrate Martin Luther King's birthday may do so on
the designated day. Employees who do not wish to celebrate his
art",d:y" ~,`,C d:aigrutad u'u~ i7,oy u!c u~we IIUU~'! a! I IUaLIOg
holiday hours to be used within the calendar year. The floating
holiday hours associated with Martin Luther King's birthday are
not usable until the recognized observance day or after, but must
be used by December 31.
(b) February - Washington's Birthday
(c) May - Memorial Day
(d) July 4 - Independence Day
(e) September -labor Day -The first Monday 1n September
(f) November it - Veteran's Day
(g) November - Thanksgiving Day
(h) November - The day following Thanksgiving
(i) December - The day preceding Christmas
(,i) December 25 - Christmas Day
(k) Twenty-four (24) hours in discretionary time may be taken by an
employee at his/her convenience xho ha; successfully coapleted
probation sub,lect to approval of the department head. Hours may
not 6e carried over from one calendar year to next.
Whenever a holiday falls on a Sunday, the following Monday shall be
observed as a holiday. Nhenever a holiday falls on a Saturday, the preceding
Friday shall be observed as the holiday.
Resolution No. 89-295
Page 7
SECTION 11: Yacatian
All full-time employees shall, with continuous service, accrue working
days of vacation monthly according to the following schedule:
length of Service in Years Annual Days Accrued
I 10
2 I1
3 12
4 13
5 14
6-8 i5
9 16
10 I~
11-13 18
14 19
15+ PO
SECTION 12: Health Insurance
The City provides health insurance plans available to all full time
continuous salaried employees and elected officials. The City agrees to pay
for all full time continuous e~loyees and elected officials medical insurance
premiums by eve ra gt ng the cost of the plans for employees as one group. The
effect of averaging for fiscal year 1989-90 is that employees will not be
responsible for payment of premiums.
SECTION 13: Dental Insurance
The City shall provide a dental insurance plan for all full-time
continuous salaried employees and elected officials. The City agrees to nay
f~~ ail lull lime continuous salaried employees and elected officials up to a
maximun of 555.00 per employee or elected official per month towards dental
insurance premiums to be calculated on a composite rate basis and to be
effective July 1, 1989.
SECTION 14: Optical Insurance
The City shall provide an optical insurance plan for all full-time
continuous salaried employees and elected officials. The City agrees to pay
for all full Lime continuous salaried employees and elected officials up to a
maximun of 514,60 per employee or elected official per month towards optical
insurance premiums to be calculated on a composite rate basis and to be
effective July 1, 1989.
SECTION 15: Premium Holiday Compensation
Maintenance employees required as part of the regular work assignment to
work on Christmas Day, New Years Day, Independence Day or Thanksgiving Day,
are allayed to observe the holiday on another day. Additionally, these
employees who work on the aforementldned destgnated holidays may select to
receive compensation on that holiday at time and one-half for the eight hour
shift, or take a second holiday as time off at a later date.
SECTIONN 16: Standby Pay
5128 perpNeeees required to be on standby shall be compensated at the rate of
Resolution No. 89-295
Page 8
SECTION 17: Overtime - Maintenance
The City agrees that employees who are sent home to rest and to be
available to work additional hours as a result of a storm or Impending
emergency situation and are not subsequently recalled to work, wiil be
compensated for the hours not worked in that shift, due to them having been
sent hove, to bring the total hours to 8 worked in that shift.
Employees who are subsequently recalled to work the storm or emergency
situation will work no more than 12 consecutive hours. Any hours worked in
excess of 8 Tn that 12 hour shift will be paid at Lime and one-half,
regardiess of the total numbers of compensated hours for that work week.
SECTION 18: Confidential Fmpl oyees
Confidential e~ryloyees are designated as such when an employee in the
course of his or her duties, has access to information relating to the City's
administration of employer-employee relations. Employees designated as
confidential employees may not act as representatives of employee organiz-
ations which represent other employees of the City. The employees designated
as confidential e~loyees are as follows:
Personnel Technician
Account Clerk -Payroll
Senior Office Assistant
Records Manager/City Clerk
Office Assistant - Personnel
Office Supervisor
Planning Commission Secretary
Executive Assistant
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 29th day of June 1489.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
nn s ou ayor
every e e y er
I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed,
approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, at an adjourned meeting of said City Council held on the 29th day
of June, 1989.
Executed this 30th day of June, 1989 at Rancho Cucamonga, California
every e e , y er
7
f
Resolution No. 69-295
Page 9
SCHEDULE I -- SALARY CODE TABLE
BASIC PAY SCHEDULE IN HOURLY, BI-MEEKLY AND MONTHLY AMOUNTS
ONE HALF PERCENT BETWEEN RANGES
MONTHLY AMOUNTS ROUNDED TO NEAREST DOLLAR
Ranqe Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Range Hourly Bt-Weekly Monthly
AV~r R~ aR~f- a .e - A rer Ram aR~- aR'-i:e
181. 4.9289 394.3109 854 221. 6.0172 481.3724 1043
182, 4.9535 396.2824 859 222, 6.0472 483.7793 1048
183. 4,9783 398.2638 863 223. 6.0775 486.1982 1053
184, 5.0032 400.2551 867 224. 6.1079 488.6292 1059
185. 5.0282 402.2564 872 225. 6.1384 491.0723 1064
186. 5,0533 404.2677 876 226. 6.1691 493.5277 1069
187. 5.0786 406.2890 880 227, 6.1999 495.9953 1075
188. 5,1040 408.3205 885 228. 6.2309 498.4753 1080
189, 5.1295 410.3621 889 229. 6.2521 500.9677 1085
190. 5.1552 412.4139 894 230, 6.2934 503,4725 1091
191. 5.1809 414.4760 898 231. 6,3249 505.9899 1096
192. 5.2069 416.5483 903 232. 6.3565 508.5198 1102
193, 5.2329 418.6311 907 233. 6,3883 511.0624 1107
194, 5.2591 420.7242 912 234. 6.4202 513.6177 1113
195. 5.2853 422.8279 916 235. 6.4523 516,1856 1118
196. 5,3118 424.9420 921 236. 6.4846 518.7667 1124
197. 5.3383 427.0667 925 237. fi.5170 521.3606 1130
198. 5.3650 429.2020 930 238. 6,5496 523.9674 1135
199. 5,3929 431.3481 935 239. 6.5823 526.5872 1141
200. 5.4188 433.5048 939 240. 6.6153 529.7909 It47
201. 5,4459 435,6723 944 241, 6,6483 531.8663 1152
202. 5.4731 437.8507 949 242. 6.6816 534.5256 1158
203, 5.5005 440,0399 953 243. 6.7150 537.1982 1164
204. 5.5280 442.2401 958 244, 6.7486 539,8842 1170
205. 5.5556 444,4513 963 245. 6,7823 542.5836 1176
206. 5.5834 446.6736 968 246. 6,8162 545.2965 1181
207. 5.6113 448.9070 973 247. 6.8503 548.0230 1187
208. 5.6394 451,1515 977 248. 6,8845 550,7631 1193
209. 5.6676 453.4073 982 249. 6.9190 553.5170 1199
210. 5.6959 455.6743 987 250. 6,9536 556,2845 1205
211, 5.7244 457.9527 992 251. 6,9883 559.0660 1211
212. 5,7530 460,2424 997 252. 7.0233 561.8613 1217
2i3. 5.7818 46?.5436 1002 253. 7,0584 564.6706 1223
214, 5,8107 dti4,e5ti4 1007 254. 7.0937 567,4940 1230
215. 5.8398 467.1806 1012 255. 7.1291 570.3314 1236
216. 5.8690 469.5165 1017 256. 7.1648 573.1831 1242
217, 5,8983 471.8641 1022 257. 7,2006 576.0490 1248
218. 5,9278 474.2234 1027 258. 7.2366 578.9292 1254
219. 5,9574 476,5946 1033 259. 7,2728 581.8239 1261
220. 5.9872 478.9775 1038 260. 7,3092 584.7330 1267
Resolution No. 89-295
Page 10
Rance Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Rance Hour1V Bi-Weekly Monthly
Number Rate Rate Rate Number Rate Rate Rate
261. 7.3457 587.6561 1273 311. 9.4262 754.0962 1634
262. 7.3824 590.5950 1280 312. 9.4733 757.8667 1642
263. 7.4193 593.5479 1286 313. 9.5207 761.6560 1650
264. 7.4564 596.5157 1292 314. 9.5683 765.4643 1659
265. 1.4937 599.4982 1299 315. 9.6161 769.2916 1667
266. 7.5312 602.4957 1305 316. 9.6642 173.1381 1675
261. 7.5689 605.5082 1312 317. 9,71?5 771.0039 1684
268. 7,6067 608.5358 1318 318. 9.7611 180.8888 1692
269. 1.6447 611.5784 1325 319. 9.8099 184.7932 1700
210. 7.6830 614.6363 1332 320. 9.8590 788.7172 1709
271. 7.1214 617.1095 1338 321. 9.9083 792.6608 1711
272. 7.7600 620.7981 1345 322. 9.9578 796.6241 1726
213. 7.7988 623.9021 1352 323. 10.0016 800.6072 1735
274. 7.8318 626.0216 1359 324. 10.0516 804.6103 1743
215. 7.8770 630.1561 1365 325. 10.1019 808.6333 1752
216. 7.9163 633.3075 1312 326. 10.1585 812.6765 1761
271. 7.9559 636.4740 1319 327. 10.2092 816.7399 1770
278. 7.9957 639.6564 1386 328. 10.2603 820.8236 1778
279. 6.0357 642.8546 1393 329. 10.3116 824.9277 1787
280. 8.0759 645.0689 1400 330. 10.3632 829.0523 1796
281. 8.1162 648.2993 1407 331. 10.4150 833.1916 1805
292. 8.1568 652.5458 i414 332. 10.4610 837.3636 1814
283. 8.1916 655.8085 1421 333. 10.5194 841.5504 1823
284. 8.2386 659.0675 1428 334. 10.5720 845.1581 1832
285. R. 279R eR7 vaan in oc Iv.u'ZYo owy.ybbY 1tl9Z
286. 8.3212 665.6949 1442 336. 10.6180 854.2369 1851
287. 8.3628 669.0234 1450 337. 10.7314 858.5080 1860
288. 8.404fi 672.3685 1457 338. 10.7850 862.8006 1869
289. 8.4466 675.7303 1464 339. 10.8389 861.1146 1879
290. 8.4889 619.1090 1471 340. 10.8932 871.4502 1888
291. 8.5313 682.5045 1479 341. 10.9476 875.8074 1898
292. 8.5740 685.9170 1486 342. 11.0023 880.1864 1907
293. 8.6168 689.3466 1494 343. 11.0513 884.5874 1911
294. 8.6599 692.1933 1501. 344. 11.1126 889.0103 1926
295. 8.7032 696.2573 1509 345. 11.1682 893.4554 1936
296. 8.7467 699.7386 1516 346. 11.2240 897.9226 1945
297. 8.,'905 703.2373 1524 341. 11.2802 902.4123 1955
298. 8.8344 706.1535 1531 348. 11.3366 906.9243 1965
2ao a o7°6 7iC.iR77 1539 349. 'i. 39]2
9ii.4569
1975
300. 8.9230 713.8367 1547 350. 11.4502 916.0162 1985
301. 8.9676 117.4079 1554 351. 11.5075 920.5963 1995
302. 9.0124 120.9949 1562 352. 11.5650 925.1993 2005
303. 9.0575 724.5999 1570 353. 11.6228 929.8253 2015
304. 9.1028 728.222.9 1578 354. 11.6809 934.4144 7.025
305. 9.1483 731.8640 1586 355. 11.7393 939.1468 2035
306. 9,1940 735.5233 1594 356. 11.7980 943.8425 2045
301. 9.2400 739.2009 1602 357. 11.8570 948.5617 2055
308. 9.2862 742.8969 1610 358. 11.9163 953.3045 2065
309. 9.3326 746.6114 1618 359. 11.9159 958.0711 2076
310. 9.3793 750.3445 1626 360. 12.0358 962.8614 2086
Resolution No. 89-295
Page ll
Rance Hou rlY Bi-Weekl Monthly Ran ae Hou rlv Bi-Weekly Monthly
Number aR to atR a Rate Number Rate Rate Rate
361. 12.0959 967.5757 2091 411. 15.5218 1241.7465 2690
362. 12.1564 972.5141 2101 412. 15.5994 1247.9552 2704
363. 12.2172 977.3767 2118 413. 15.6774 1254.1950 2117
364. 12.2783 982.2635 2126 414. 15.7558 1260.4660 2731
365. 12.3391 967.1749 2139 415. 15.8346 1266.7683 2745
366. 12.4014 992.1108 2150 416. 15.9138 1273.1021 2758
361. 12.4634 997.0713 2160 411. 15.9933 1279.4676 2172
358. 12.5257 1002.0567 2171 418. 16.0733 1285.8650 2186
369. 12.5883 1007.0669 2182 419. 16.1537 1292.2943 2800
310. 12.6513 1012.1023 2193 420. 16.2344 1298.7558 2614
371. 12.7145 1017.1628 2204 421. 16.3156 1305.2496 2828
372. 12.7761 1022.2486 2215 422. 16.3972 1311.7758 2842
313. 12.8420 1027.3598 2226 423. 16.4792 1318.3347 2856
314. 12.9062 1032.4966 2237 424. 16.5616 1324.9264 2671
375. 12.9701 1037.6591 2248 425. 16.6444 1331.5510 2885
376. 13.0356 1042.8474 2260 426. 16.7276 1338.2087 2899
377. 13.1008 1048.0617 2271 427. 16.8112 1344.8998 2914
378. 13.1663 1053.3020 2282 428. 16.8953 1351.6243 2929
379. 13.2321 1058.5685 2294 429. 16.9798 1358.3824 2943
380. 13.2963 1063.8613 2305 430. 11.0647 1365.1743 2958
381. 13.3648 1069.1806 2317 431. 17.1500 1372.0002 2973
382. 13.4316 1074.5265 2328 432. 17.2356 1378.8602 2988
383. 13.4987 1079.8992 2340 433. 17.3219 1385.7545 3002
384. 13.5662 1085.2987 2351 434. 17.4085 1392.6833 30]7
385. 13.6341 1090.7252 2363 435. 11.4956 1399.6461 3033
sdd. ie.iuG[ 1U96.1/a8 23/5 436. 17.5831 1406.6449 3048
381. 13.1707 1101.6591 2387 437. 17.6710 1413.6781 3063
388. 13.8396 1107.1680 2399 438. 17.7593 1420.7465 3078
389. 13.9088 1112.7038 2411 439. 11.8481 1427.6503 3094
390. 13.9783 1118.2673 2423 440. 17.9374 1434.9695 3109
391. 14.0482 1123.8587 2435 441. 18.0271 1442.1645 3125
392. 14.1185 1129.4780 240.7 442. 18.1172 1449.3753 3140
393. 14.1891 1135.1254 2459 443. 16.2078 1456.6222 3156
394. 14.2600 1140.8010 247? 444. 18.2988 1463.9053 3172
395. 14.3313 1146.5050 2484 445. 18.3903 1471.2248 3168
396. 14.4030 1152.2375 2497 446. 18.4823 1478.5809 3204
391. 14.4750 1151.9987 2509 447. 18.5747 1485.9738 322C
398. :4.5474 1163.7887 2522 448. 18.6577 1493.4037 3236
399. 14.6201 1169.6016 7534 dd9. 18 76no 15n0,o707 3252
4"v"u. 14.6932 1115.4551 2547 450. 18.8547 1508.3751 3268
401. 14.7667 1181.3329 2560 451. 18,9490 1515.9169 3284
402. 14.8405 1181.2396 2572 452. 19.0437 1523.4965 3301
403. 14.9147 1193.1758 2585 453. 19.1389 1531.1140 3317
404. 14.9893 1199.1417 2598 454. 19.2346 1538.7646 3334
405. 15.0642 1205.1314 2611 455. 19.3308 1546.4634 3351
406. 15.1395 1211.1631 2624 456. 19.4274 1554.1957 3367
407, 15.2152 1217.2189 2637 457. 19.5246 1561.9667 3384
408. 15.2913 1223.3050 2650 458. 19.6222 1569.7766 3401
409. 15.3678 1229.4215 2664 459. 19.1203 1577.6254 3418
410. 15.4446 1235.5666 2617 460. 19.8189 1585.5136 3435
Resolution No. 89-295
Page 12
Range Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Ranae Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly
Number Rate Rate Rate Number Rate Rate Rate
461. 19.9180 1593.4411 3452 511. 25.5593 2044.7448 4430
462. 7.0.0176 1601.4083 3470 512. 25.6871 2054.9685 4452
463. 20.1177 1609.4154 3487 513. 25.8155 1065.2434 4475
464. 20.2183 1617.4625 3505 514. 25.9446 2075.5696 4497
465. 20.3194 1625.5498 35'22 515. 26.0743 2085.9414 4520
466. 20.4210 1633.6775 3540 516. 26.2041 2096.3172 4542
467. 20.5231 1641.8459 3557 517. 26.3357 2106.4590 4565
4b8. 20.6257 1650.0551 3575 518. 26.4674 2111.3933 4588
469. 20.7288 1658.3054 3593 519. 26.5998 2127.9803 4611
470. 20.8325 1666.5959 3611 520. 26.1328 2138.5202 4634
411. 20.9366 1674.9299 3629 521. 26.8664 2149.3133 4651
472. 21.0413 1683.3046 3647 522. 21.0007 2160.0599 4680
473. 21.1465 1691.7211 3665 523. 27.1358 2170.8602 4704
474. 21.2522 1700.1797 3684 524. 21.2714 2181.7145 4127
415. 21.3585 1108.6806 3702 525. 27.4078 2192.6230 4751
416. 21.4653 1717.2240 3121 526. 21.5448 2203.5862 4774
417. 21.5726 1125.8101 3739 521. 21.6826 2214.6041 4798
478. 21.6805 1734.4392 3758 528. 21.8210 2225.6771 4822
479. 21.7889 1143.1114 3777 529. 21.9601 2236.8055 4846
480. 21.8978 1751.8269 3796 530. 28.0999 2247.9895 4871
461. 22.0073 1760.5861 3815 531. 28.2404 2259.2295 4895
482. 22.1174 1769.3390 3834 532. 2b.3816 2210.5256 4919
483. 22.2219 1718.2359 3853 533. 28.5235 2281.8183 4944
484. 22.3391 1187.1271 3872 534. 28.6661 2293.2876 4969
465. 27.4508 1796.Ofi77 iR91 G?c ?o onna ~-•
.~~,
466. 22.5630 1805.0431 3911 536. 28.9535 2316.2179 5019
481. 22.6759 1814.0683 3930 537. 29.0982 2327.8592 5044
498. 22.7892 1623.1386 3950 538. 29.2431 2339.4985 5069
489. 22.9032 1832.2543 3970 539. 29.3900 2351.1960 5094
490. 23.0177 1841.4156 3990 540. 29.5369 2362.9520 5120
491. 23.1328 1850.6227 4010 541. 29.6846 2374.7668 5145
492. 23.2484 1859.8758 4030 542. 29.8330 2366.6406 5171
493. 23.3641 1869.1152 4050 543. 29.9822 2398.5138 5197
494. 23.4815 1818.5210 4010 544. .30.1321 2410.5667 5223
495. 23.5989 1881.9136 4090 545. 30.2827 2422.6195 5249
496. 23.7169 1697.3532 4111 546. 30.4342 2434.1326 5275
497. 23.8355 190b.8400 4131 541. 30.5863 2446.9063 5302
498. 23.9541 1916.3742 4152 548. 30,7393 2459.1408 5328
449. 24.0745 L25.9560 4ll3 549. 70,89?0 2471,4365 5355
5u0. 24.194A 1935.5858 4194 550. 31.0414 2483.1937 5382
501. 24.3158 1945.2637 4215 551. 31.2021 2496.2127 5408
502_. 24.4374 1954.9901 4236 552. 31.3587 2508.6937 5436
503. 24.5596 1964.1650 4257 553. 31.5155 2521.2312 5463
504. 24.6824 1914.5888 4278 554. 31.6130 2533.8434 5490
505. 24.8058 1984.4618 4300 555. 31.8314 2546.5126 5517
506. 24.9298 1994.3841 4321 556. 31.9906 2559.2452 5545
507, 25.0545 2004..3560 4343 557, 32.1505 2572.0414 5573
508. 25.1797 2014.3778 4364 558. 32.3113 2584.901G 5601
509. 25.3056 2024.4497 4386 559. 32.4728 2591.8261 5629
510. 25.4321 2034.5719 4408 560. 32.6352 2610.8152 5657
Resolution No. 89-295
Page 13
Range Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Ranoe Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthlv
Number Rate Rate Rate Number Rate Rate Rate
561. 32.7964 2623.6693 5685 611. 42.0878 3367.0168 7295
562. 32.9624 2626.9886 5713 61?. 47,2982 3383.8519 7333
563. 33.1272 2650.1736 5742 613. 42.5097 3400.7112 7310
564. 33.2928 2663.4245 5711 614. 42.1222 3411.1150 7407
565. 33.4593 2676.7416 5800 615. 42.9358 3434.8634 7444
566. 33.6266 2690.1253 5829 616. 43.1505 3452.0382 7481
567, 33.7947 2?03.5759 5858 617. 43.3663 3469.2984 7518
568. 33.9637 2717.0938 5887 618. 43.5831 3486.6449 1556
569. 34.1335 2130.6793 5916 619. 43.8010 3504.0781 1594
570. 34.3042 2744.3327 5946 620. 44.0200 3521.5985 7632
571. 34.4757 2158.0543 5976 621. 44.240 3539.206 7670
572. 34.6481 2771.8446 6005 622. 44.461 3556.902 7709
573. 34.8213 2185.7038 6036 623. 44.683 3574.687 7747
574. 34.9954 2199.6323 6066 624. 44.906 3592.560 7786
575. 35.1704 2813.6305 6096 625. 45.131 3610.523 7825
576. 35.3462 2827.6981 6121 626. 45.357 3628.576 1864
577. 35.5230 2841.6371 6151 62i. 45.584 3646.719 7903
578. 35.7006 2856.0463 6188 628. 45.812 3664.953 7943
579. 35.8791 2810.3266 6219 629. 46.041 3683.278 7983
580. 36..0585 2884.6782 6250 630. 46.211 3701.694 8023
581. 36.2388 2899.1016 6281 631. 46.502 3720.202 806?
582. 36.4200 2913.5971 6313 632. 46.735 3138.8D3 8103
583. 36.6021 2928.1651 6344 633. 46.969 3757.497 8144
584. 36.7851 2942.8059 6376 634. 41.204 3716.284 8184
u.>uw v~i.oi7y owuo b10. 4l.49U 3/96.165 8225
586. 37.1538 2972.3075 5440 636. 47.611 3814.141 8261
587. 37.3396 2981.1691 6472 631. 41.915 3833.212 8.308
588. 31.5263 3002.1049 6505 638. 48.155 3852.318 8349
589. 37,7139 3017.1154 6537 639. 48.396 3871.540 8391
590. 31.9025 3032.2010 6570 640. 48.638 3890.998 8433
591. 38.0920 3047.3620 6603 641. 48.881 3910.453 8475
592. 38.2825 3062.5988 6536 642. 49.125 3930.005 A618
593. 38.4739 3077.9118 6669 643. 49.371 3949.655 8560
594, 38.6663 3093.3014 6702 644. 49.618 3969.403 8603
595, 38.8596 3168.7679 6736 645. 49.866 3989.?50 8646
596. 39.0539 3124.3117 6769 646. 50.115 4009.196 8689
597. 39.1492 3139.9333 6803 647. 50.366 407.9.242 8733
598. 39.4454 3155.6330 6837 648. 50.618 4044.388 n776
h99 3° 64"2` 'i7 i.4lli 6"071 649. 50,871 4069.63h 8820
600. 39.8409 3187.2682 6906 650. 51.125 4069.983 8864
601. 40.0401 3203.2045 6941 651. 51.381 4110.433 8908
602. 40.2403 3219.2206 6976 652. 51.638 4130.985 8952
603. 40.4415 3235.3167 7011 653. 51.896 4151.640 8996
604. 40.6437 3251.4932 1046 654. 52.155 4172.400 9040
605. 40.8469 3267.1507 1081 655. 52.420 4193.262 9085
606. 41.0512 3284.0895 1117 656. 52.683 4214.230 9130
607. 41.2564 3300.5100 7152 651. 52.943 4235.301 9175
608. 41,4627 3311.0125 7188 658. 53.208 4256.478 9220
609. 41.6700 3333.5975 7224 659. 53.474 4277.160 9266
610. 41.8784 3350.2655 7260 660. 53.741 4299.150 ;312
-- ----- - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT ~` ~~
Date: June 29, 1989
To: Mayor, City Council and City Manager
From: Elizabeth Stoddard, Finance Manager
Subject: ADDPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 1999/90 BUDGET AND 1990/91 FISCAL PLAN;
ARTICLE KIIIB APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
RECOIWENDATION•
1. Council adopt attached Resolutions adopting the fiscal year 1989/90
operational budget and the 1990/91 fiscal plans. ~
i
2. Set the Article XIIIB Appropriations limit for fiscal year 1969/90. i
BACKBROUND• ~
for the first time, the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga has proposed a two-year
Program of Service. The 1989/90 fiscal year budget will be the upcoming
"operational' budget, while the 1990/91 fiscal year is inte~~d ed as a "Planned"
budget subject to refinement and modification based upon changes in the
economy or community goals.
The City Council has conducted two budget workshops wherein various elements
of the proposed budget have been discussed. After consideration of the issues
by the Council, a sum of 560,000 has been included from fund balance for the
purpose of performing an independent study of law enforcement needs and
options.
The attached Resolution No. 89-297 adop*,s the 2 year budget as presented with
the Council modifications included.
General Fund
Fiscal Year 1989/90
Fiscal Year 1990/91
523,924,541
524,909,016
Capital Funds Total
536,576,685
523,172,866
E 60,501,232
5 48,081,882
Grand Total
5108,583,114
Resolution No. 89-296 adopts the annual appropriation limit as required by
Article XIIIB of the State Constitution. Based upon the factors of the Gann
Limit C.P.I, calculation of 4.98% and a population change of 9.48%, Lhe City's
fiscal year 1989/90 limit is 516,609,483.
Respec tfu~~l..l~~y submitted,
El i a et~~dda r)
Fin ce Manager
ES /d ah
~~
RESOLUTION N0. 89-296
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AN
APPROPRIATION LIMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF
THE CALIFORNIA STATE CONSTITUTION FOR FISCAL
YEAR 1989/90.
WHEREAS, Article XIIIB of the State of California provides that the
total annual appropriations subject to limitation of the State and of each
local government shall not exceed the appropriations limit of such entity of
government for the prior year adjusted for changes in the cost of living and
population except as other wise provided in said Article %IIIB, and;
WHEREAS, pursuant to said Article XIIIB of the Constitution of the
State of California, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga deems it
to be in the best interests of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish an
appropriations limit for the Fiscal Year 1989/90, and;
WHEREAS, the Finance Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has
determined that said appropriations limit for the Fiscal Year 1989/90 be
established in the amount of 516,609,483.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga that an appropriation limit for the Fiscal Year 1989/90
._
Y" _ _ _ _ u u v
established in the amountu of `E16 ,609,483~,~andV the `same is 4h ereby establ~i~shed.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said appropriations limit herein
established may be changed as deemed necessary by resolution of the City
Council.
/~
RESOLUTION N0. 89-297
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADOPTING THE CITY'S BUDGET (GAS
TAX, ANO OTHER SPECIAL PURPOSE FUNDS, AND
ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS) FOR FISCAL YEAR
1989/90 OPERATIONAL BUDGET AND 1990;°.? F?SCAL
PLAN.
WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council held workshops to review
the appropriation requests for the FY 89/91, and;
WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a public hearing on
the General City Budget, and;
WHEREAS, this public hearing was published in a newspaper of general
circulation and held on June 29, 1989.
NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESDLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, in special session assembled this 29th day of
June 1989, as follows:
FISCAL PLAN. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Budget for the fiscal year lYBY/yt,
on file in the office of the Finance Manager, is hereby adopted in the amount
of E108,583,114. This budget total includes appropriations for other special
pu rpu se fwid s.
SECTION 2: TRANSFERS OF FUNDS BETWEEN AND/DR WITH APPROPRIATIONS.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga inay transfer funds between
funds or activities set forth in the budget. The City Manager may transfer
funds between appropriations within an appropriation as set forth in the
budget and may transfer appropriations between activities within any fund.
SECTION 3: TRANSFERS Of FUNDS BETWEEN FUNDS. Transfers of funds
between funds as shown on the Fund Analysis shall be made as expenditures
warrant such transfers.
SECTION 4: DISBURSEMENTS. The City Manager and the Finance
Manager, or the duly designated representative, are hereby empowered and
authorized to disburse funds pursuant to appropriations provided for in the
'980,00 budge ^d h^. .h., spo :b: l:Yy ~ ablten pr.._ed:f, and rn
administratively implement and control bud ge ton all matters, except direct
expenditures by Council members which require Council approval,
SECTION 5: ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS. The City Council may amend
this budget to add or delete appropriations.
/'