Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1990/03/21 - Agenda Packet
~~ CITY /1 I1T T1T /'1TT ~; I.VUlVl.1L ~ w s w.. e .A CT ~ 1V L A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. March 21, 1990 Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga +s: City Councilmembers Dennis L. $IOUt, Mayor Pamela 1. Wright, cavnr;rmemDe. Deborah N. Bcown, Aroyo. r~nm Charles J. Buquet, coveenmemDr. William J. Alexander, counrnmembrr ~~r Jack LQln, tip',gnnaRrr James L. Markman, c'ru'mm.nr~~ Debra J. Adams, c~t,~ rrr.A~ City Office: 989-1851 Lions Pak: 980-3145 I Pace City Council Agenda March 21, 1990 1 i ~'~ ~'~ ~ ' ~ All items submitted for the City Couvc it Agavda moot be iv ~ ~, i writivg. The deadlive for au6mitting thaw Stems is 5100 p.m. '~. i I '~, on the Nadva adap prior to iha watlag. Ttlm l'iey Cierw'• ' I, ~, 'I '. ~' Off iee receives all ouch items. I I I A• GI.L TO ORDER ~' III ~'., 1. Pledge of Allegiance to ee^lag. I'~I ~~, 12. Roll Call: Buquet _, Alexander _, Stout _, '~ 'I ~I ''~ Ezown and Wright III I, ~I~li ~I'i E. ANN0VNC61QdiTB/PRE9ENTATIONB ' 1. Preaentat ion to Commemorate Community Development Block i II ~ Grant Week. ~ II ~ I' II C. COIOOINIGTIONS pROM THE PC13GIC it I this in tae time sad piece for the geaernl public [o nddrena I ~I tae Citp Council. ataG law prohibits the Cilp Council from ' i, i addrmaaing sap Usum sot prmvioualp i¢cludmd oa thm Agaada. '~, '~, The Cttp Council up rmaivm hallway and set tae uttmr for ' ~~, ~ a subsaqusnt uatiaq. Comunts are to be limited to five ''~ miauGa Per individual. II ' ~ O. CONSENT CAL@7DAR ~ i i i I ~ ~~ i ' ~I ~', I ~, '~I The following Consan! GLndar iGU ere expeetad to ba ~ ~ ~I ' routine and aoa-controvmrsLl. Thep will ba acted upon by tea i '~ I Council at ono Liam without diacuuion. Any lies up be i removed by a ComciLember or member of the eud lento far ~ II! diacrosiov, ~ I li ~I~, ~' ~~ 1. Approval o£ Minuteeo Pebrunry 7, 1990 ~ ' ! ~~ ~ ~ PebruarY 14, 1990 i ~., ",, February 21, 1990 I ' '~ ~ ~ March 7, 1990 (Brown absent) ' ~ I 2. Approval of Warrnnte, Register Noe. 3/7/90 end 3/14/90; 1 and Payroll mnding 3/15/90 Cor the total amount of $1,9%,185.77. 3. Alcoholic Bavmragm Application for On Salm Ganaral 9 Eating Place foz Nango'• Beachfront Cafm, Tumbleweed Cr111, Incorporated, E034 Haven Avenue. PAGE City Council Agenda March 21, 1990 ' ~', 4. Approval to authorize the advartiaing of the "Notice 11 ~ ~~ ~,i Inviting Bide" for the Highland Avenue Reconetructicn, ~ ~, Hermosa Avenue tc Hayberry Avenue Improvement Proje Ct, ~~ '~, '~ to be Eunded from TDA Arfi r~o a, .._C.,_:. ..0. .,. ...~,- ~, ~, ~ 8930 (FY 89/90). it HESnLi~T T_ON YO. ^.-11+ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PTNiS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "HIGHLAND AVENVE RECONSTRUCTION, HfiRHOSA AVENUE TO MAYBERRY AVENUE" IN SAID C1 TY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLSAR TO ADVEATI SE TO RECEIVE BIDS 5. Approval to authorize the advartiaing of the ^Not ice Inviting Bida^ fez Baae Llne Aoad Hedien Retrof Lt from Nevan Avenue to Deez Creek, to be Funded fiem Landscape Haintenance District No. 4, Account No. 43-4130-8956 (PY 89/90). R8SOLUTION NO. 90-114 A REBOLVT ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THS CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING _ _._ ._._ -......::w" nu avn rqL "BASE LINE RETROFIT, FAOH NAVENLAVENVE TO DEER CREEK", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DI RECTTNC THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDB 6. Approval to designate Milliken Park ae the name of the park Bite edj scent to the future Y.M.C.A. facility ae rerommended by the Park end Recreation Commission. 7. Approval of an adjustment to the Tri-community boundary line used for community identification on City street name signs. Adjusting the westerly boundary of Et iwanda and the easterly boundaries of the Alta Loma and Cucertwngn arena Erom along Rochester Avenue between Bnee Line Roed end 4[h Street io be along Dey Creek Channel and Canyon from the .. -thcrn ..ity apimrs limit to Intereente 19 then continuing along interstate 15 to 4th SC rest. 8. Approval to purchase (1) Insulated Telescopic Aerial Lift mounted on Van wLch modificatlone, To be purchased from Nsst Coast Util lty Bquipment Company of Fontana, California in the amount of g39,g96.31 to be funded from Gee Tex Account D9-Ob47-7045. i I 16 I 17 21 22 zQ 2 :~. PAGE city council Agentla I, March 21, 1990 j 3 9. Approval to purchase one (1) Chevrclet Sxtended Mini Van at 313,860.09, to be purchased Erom Rotolo Chevrolet antl funded from tha Ica Account, ono (1) Ford Super-Duty 'r. - -r ,. 17, a7d, i1 , to 6e nurrbaend fmm wi i t Nix Pord end funded from Account No. O1-4647-7045. 10. Approval to award and execute the Professional Services Agreement (CO 90-028) for the construction coat estimates and mapping for the Tralle Implementation Plan to .]. P. Davidson Associates for the amount of $12,980.00, to be funded from ContracC Services Account No. 01-6333-6028 (PY 89/90), ll. Approval to award and execute the Professional Services Agreement (CO 90-043) far the financing plan for the Trails Implementation Plan Go Agajanien d Associates for the amount of $18,000.00, to be funded from Contract Services Account No. O1-4333-6028 (PY 89/90), 12. Approval to execute the Grant of Basement (CO 90-044) to Southern California Shcaon for the putpcse of providing electrical power to Waet Beryl Park. 13. Approval to execute a Cooperat Sve Agreement (CO 90-007) with the City OE Vpland Por the installation of a traffic signal nt 19th Street and Sapphire Street. This agreement will insure that the Rancho Cucamonga eR4re of the coat will remain 25t if Coltrane funding is not obtained. It also requires llpland to provide the remaining 75t under those circumstances. The City's estimated share remains at $35,475.00 from Transportation Development Fund, Account No. 12-4637- 8919. ABSOLUTION NO, 90-115 A ABSOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH8 CITY OF RANCHO CVCANONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THS BXSCUTI ON OF A COOPSAATIVS AGASSMENT WITH THE CITY OP VPLAND FOR THS DS9ION AND CONSTAnCTiON OF A TAAPP IC SIGNAL ON 19TH STRBET (ROUTE 30) AT SAPPHIRE STAEST 14. Approval Lo execute a Cooperative Agreement (CO 90-045) wlih Caltran^ far tha modi[icatione to the I-15/Route 66 interchange. A refundable deposit of $100,000.00 will bo required, to bo fundad from RDA Account No. 13- 50300. 25 26 26 i 27 28 29 30 / a City Counc 11 Agenda ee ~< ~ ~ Harch 21, 199C e eP a°a 8d 3= I PAGE 4 ~ ~~' ~'~ ~I ~~ AEEOLUTION NO. 90-116 3j ~' j ~' ~' A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY j i '. ~~ ~ 'i OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ' I ~i COOPEAATIVH AGREEMENT NO. 8-654 WITH THE ~I i STATB OP CAL IPOANIA DEPARTMENT OF I~ ~'i ~. '', TRANSPORTATION FoA TH% I-15/ROUTE 66 ~' ~~ '', ''~ ', INTERCHANGE MODIPICATIONS AND AVTHORI2INC i ' I '~ i '.~ '~ THE SIGNING THEREOF BY THE HAYOA ~ '', ~I ~I, I'I 15. Approval to award and authorization for execution of ~ 77 ~'~. I '~~ '~ contract (co 90-046) for 19th Street Improvement 'I ' ', P[oject, located fray the west City limits to Carnelian '~. I Street to Gentry Brothers, Incorporated, for the amount i I ! I li I of $285,625.00 ($259,659.20 plus lOt contingency), to ! be footled with Syeteme Development funds, Account No. i ~~ I 22-4637-8743 (PY 89/90). 16. i i i II Approval to execute Reimbursement Agreement (co 90-047) 35 I I for inet allot ion of porticna of Neater Planned Storm I ~ I I Drain Facillt lee in connection with developaent of Tract ' 'I I Noa. 12650-2, 12650-3r 12650-4, located northerly of Hillaida Aoad, Eciwccr. Haven Avenue an3 Daer Creek ~ I, i Channel; and Tract Nos. 13542-1, 13542-2, 13542-3 and 13542, located southerly oP Wilson Avenue, westerly of '~ ~ I Dear creak Chennal: between Gricsby Development, I I, ICI I~ li ~ Incorporated and the Clty of Aencho Cucamonga - DRA-10. I ~, I ! 17. Approval to execute Reimbursement Agreement (CO 90-048) 3A ~~ I ~~ ' for Unde[grounding of Overhead Utilities for Tract No. I ~~. ' ~ 13342, located north oP 19th Street, between Hermosa li , I 'I i Avenue and Mayberry Avenue, submitted by Pennon Design/ ~ II Oevalopment, Incorporated. i RESOLUTION N0. 90-1i7 40 t I I A ABSOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ~ OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ., ~ I~ REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT EXECUTED ON MARCH ~ 21, 3990 FOR UNDEROROUNDINO OP A PORTION OF i i I i DVBP.!?EAD UT IL ITZES LOCATED MORTH OP 19TH STAEBT, BETWEHN NEPMOSA AVENUE AND MAYBBRRY I I~~ AVENUE PACE / . City Council Agenda ` March 21, 1990 5 a o` e/3' 3r i '~, ' I II 18. Approval Co execute Contract Change Order No. 1 (CO 89- ii i I~, '~ 079) with J.F. Devldean Aeeoci atee, Incorporated, to ', ! I '. I, orcviae utii ity deoth surveys and legal deecript ion for ~ I, I, ~! 'I Lemon Avenue Storm Drain. The Change Order Se for the ~, . i ~, total aloounC of $3,992.00 to bring the contract total ~. it ~ ~'.~ ~', ~~ to 540,492.00 to be paid from Drainage Punde, Account No. 23-4637-0063-4603-4110. 4Z 19. '. ', I i '~ Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 1 (CO 89- i ~'~ '', ~ ', 013) for a Profess tonal Services Agreement with Ramco ~. '. ''~ ''. ~', '~, Coneu ltante to renegotiate with the property owner (APN I '., ', I, ~, 202-191-20) and prepare right-of-way map for Caltrane ', ~ I ', I '~ on 19th Street Project from Archibald to Haven Avenue e. ~ ~', ~ ~I '~, ~~~ I Contract to be expanded by $5,000.00 to bring contract , ~ ~~ ~~, total to 524,030.00 to be paSd from Syateme Development , I Fund Account No. 22-4637-8784. 20. Approval of Map and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance Dietrlct No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance Dlatrlct Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 12048, located on the south side of Arrow Route between Utica and Red Oak Avenue9. A650LUTION NO. 90-118 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMEBR 1284E RESOLUTION NO. 90-119 A RESOLUTION OF THS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OP CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND STREET LICHTINO MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 POR PARCEL MAP 12840 21. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, Drainage Recipients Agreement, and Ordirina [hi Annex et Lon Co Landecspi MAlntenenci DSYt r1Ct No. 1 nna strwt Llgnt lag MalntenanCe UlaLr1CL Noe. 1 an4 2 for Tract 13735, located on the southwest corner of Almond Street and Sapphire Streit, submitted by Rodini Caspanias, Incorporated. I 43 ~ 44 I 45 I, I i 4a PAGE City Council Agenda March 21, 1990 6 RESOLUTION NO. 90-120 ~ 4B A RESOLUTION OF TN% CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING i IISROVETDiN'f AGREEMENT, I!Q'ROVE!ffiiT SECURITY, DRAINAGE ACCBPTANCB AGREEMENT, AND FINAL MAP Uk '[NAC'T NO. i3 i3o RESOLUTION NO. 90-121 5~ A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY ', OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING I THH ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO ~, LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STABET LEGHTING MAINTENANCE OZSTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 POR TRACT 13736 22. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement 53 Security and Monument at ion each deposit for Tract 13753, located aL Lhe northeast corner of Esee Line Aoad and Milliken Avenu6, eubmittsd by Victoria Cucamonga Partners, L. P., and releeee Of previously eubmltted Improvement Agreement, Security, and NOnumentat lop ~ deposit aceeptsd by City Council on Janunry 18, 1989, i from the NLiliam Lyon Company'. RESVLUI'lUN NU. YV-ie[ I 5y A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT ANO IMPROVEMENT SECUAZTY FOR TNACT 13753 AND RELEASING THE IMPROVElD:NT AGREEMENT ANP SECURITY PREVIOUSLY ACCE PTEO BY CITY COUNCIL ON JANUARY 18, 1989 23. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement B.tteneion for 56 Tract 13644 located on the soot beset corner of Hermosa Avenue end Vista Grove Street, submitted by Woodridge Eei ales Ltd. ' b iUii H b0 - JV Fi v v . iv !LJ a A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY POR TRACT 13644 vW PAGE City Council Agenda li MaYCh 21, 1990 i, 7 '~ ', ~I 24. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for I 59 ~ ~ I .... -, -- L^Cated ..., .yo nrnrth etas of Arrow Route Iii ~~ '~, ~'~, between Rochester Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted ii I ~~~ by Fontana Steal. ' ~ ~~ ', RESOLUTION NO. 90-124 6~-A . ~' ', w vseni.nT TON OF THS CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY ' ~~, ~ 'i OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ~''~, ~I I' ~ '. IMPROVE!ffiNT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND ', ~'i ~~ IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOA DA 87-51 j ~' ~'., ~ 25. Approval of Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice it j i of Completion for: ~I ~ i~ Tract 11606-1 located on the southwest corner of 61 ~ I I V}_ct 1 Street a d Na ao street. i ~ i, ~ ~ i ~ III ! Release: '. i Faithful Yetformence Band (Street) $403,000.00 I I I 'i Accept: l i ~~' I I Maintenance Guarantee Bono (Street) $ 40,300.00 ', ! ~II RESOLUTION NO. 90-125 62 ~ I i ~ I ' i ~,, A RESOLUTION VP 'lNIS O1'I'Y WUNCIL Ut 'I'nn u'a'x ', i 'i OF RANCHO NCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING I ' '' '', '' THS PUBLIC IMPAOVEMSNTS FOR TRACT 11606-1 ~I '. AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OF A NOTICE OF ~, ', ~'', '., ' COMPLETION POR THE WORR '~ ~. ~i ' I ~'., '', Tra t 11606-3 located on the south ast cor er of 63 j j ~ I I Victo[ia St[eat end Mendocino Street ' '', ' Aeleaee: i ~ ! i Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $310,000.00 j III II ~ ~ Accept: i '~ Ma lntenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 31,800.00 ii ' -- - - 9G-. ' 6A ' j l a,.BwLD.:GN HD .r A RESOLUTION OP THE CITX COUNCIL OP THB CITY OP RANCHO CIICAMONOAr CAL IPORNIA, ACCEPTING i i TINS PUBLIC 2NPR0VEMENTB FOR TRACT 11606-3 AND AUTHORIZING THB PILING OP A NOTICE OF COMPLETION POR THE NOP.R PACF. City Council Agenda March 21, 1990 8 Tract 33542-3 located on the noriheaet co rner of Banvan ~ 65 street and Canietel Avenue Iii Release Faithful Performance Bond: Street $403,000.00 Banyan Landscape $ 28,800.00 Accept Maintenance Guarantee Bond: street C,3CC ^° Y ~ Banyan Landscape $ 2, 880.00 I RESOLUTION NO. 90-127 ~' 66 A RRSOLVTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PVBLIC IMPROVEMENTS POR TRACT 13542-3 AND AUTHORIEING THE PILING OF A NOTICB OF COMPLBTION POR TH8 MORN 26. Approval to accept Improvements, re lases of Maintenance Guarantee Bond for: Tract 11793 located on the east aide o m . by « «w a 67 NlGhland Avenue and Lemon Avenue Hain[enance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 24,800.00 I Tract 11853 1 tad on th orthenet c orns f 19th 68 St feet and Ramona Avenue Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 4,250.00 Tract 11893 Locnied on the eo th aide f I B St t I 69 het ee s ooh're St eet d o on a C k Maintenance Guarantee Bond (street) $ 25,800,00 Trnct 12832 to nted o the a th t or er f VS t r' 70 Park Lane and Vi etoiLa NL ndrowe Looo Meintenartoe Ouarantee Bond (Street) S 35.500.00 Tract 13353 located en the northw^et c orner of 19th 71 Street and Archibald Avenue Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 29,600.00 City Council Agenda PAGE ~ ~o > $ ~ March 21, 1990 j 9 ~? o` 0'83` I I I Ili ~ ~ 27. Appzovel to accept the E[iwantla Cobblestone Cutb, ~ 7z i '. '',, Contract No. E9-168, ae complete, release bonds and ~i i ~ autROrite the City Hngineer to file a "Notice of ', ''. ', AEEOLUTION NO. 90-128 )3 ~' ~~, ~~ ~~ A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ~', ' I ~ ~ ~ nF Rnurvn nnnaunwm mar ranowrs ~~pom+.,~_ '~ ~,, I~ THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR aET IWANDA; 'i ii i, COBBLHSTONH CURB, CONTRACT NO. 89-168, ANO ''. i AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF '. I~ I ''. ~.~ COMPLETION POR THE WORK iii E• CON86NT ORDINANCEe The following Ordinanen haw Dad puDlie hgringe et the tLe of first reading. second readings are axPaciad to De routine avd non-coalrooraial. They will M aeted upon by the Comcil a! ove tia without diacuasiov. The Cit} CLrk will read the title. MT i!q can be rawvad for diacuaaioa. 1. OADINANCB NO. 417 (eecontl reading) AN ORD INAA CE OF TXE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 15 OP THE MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 4T REOAADING EARTHQUAKE HAZARD REDUCTION IN UNRE INPORCED MASONRY OUILOINGS AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF Tha followivg iron have Dean advert iced avd/or poabd u public hurinya a required by law. TDe chair will open the :::Ling to t:c:iv: yahiic t::tiaway. 1. WNBIDEAATI0N OF A RHeOLUTION PPAOVINC TH6 PINANCINC AND REFINANCING OF A PORTION OF THB RANCHO AEDSVELOPIUINT i4 )~ 104 ~~ City Council Agenda it pAGE March 21, 1990 10 ~, '~i '~. PESOLUTION NO. 90-129 i ' I A RESOLUTION oP THY Crmy r-.-.~.,-~„ -_ _.,- --.. '~ ', '~i OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALI PORNIA, APPROVING ~, I THH FINANCING AND REFINANCING OF A PORTION ' ' OF THE RANCHO REDEVELOP!ffiNT PROJECT eY THE wltiC"r.0 CiiCnMvNGA Iv.unvaLvl-Ncivi AGENC: 'I I '' TNB REDEVELOPMENT AOR7CY HILL RECONVENE AT THI6 POINT IN THE II ~ 1o;ETIN6. z. c u B N G R A N PIN GS IN REGARD THERETO ILEDIC HOUS81 RESOLUTION NO. 90-130 A RESOLUTION OP TH8 CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REGRADING PROJECTS GENE PITTING THE RANCHO R80EVELOPt~NT PROJECT AND HARING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN REGARD THERETO 3. NEJU U.. GN .. _.. .... .. ... (LED IG HOUSEI AESOLUT ION N0. RA 90-006 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THB CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONCA, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING PROJECTS BENEPITTINC THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND NAI(I NG CERTAIN FINDINGS IN PEGARD THERETO • • ~ TBE REDEVEIgPI®Pl AO@7CY NILL ADJOVRN ITE MEETING AT THIB POINT. 4. CONSIDERATION O! COMMUNITY DEVELOPl~NT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION FISCAL YEAR 1990-1991 - The ndopi ion of the Prellminery StatYment of Community DBVelopRwnt Object LVU and Projected Uw of Punde for the Community Development Block Grent ApplLcat Son Eor the Piecel Yeer 1990-91 bnead on en ant icipetad grert of 5433,000.00. 105 107 i09 111 113 115 city council Agenda PAGE March 21, 1990 ~ 11 O. PVHLIC BEAAINOB Tae following Ltga have vo legal publication or posting requirueats. Tae Chair will open the ~eativg to receive public teat irony. 1. E)iT~I{ENT _yO71AIN ACTjON ..TO ACOVI AE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY R 8 OS BSTwSSN ViCTDA7A PAnA i.ANA nun vrv+wv _ _ AND 12472 BA58 LINE ROAD1 - Public Hearing of protests regarding Eminent Domain action to acquire public right- of-way for the Baee Line Aoad Widening, Parcel Map 11838, Project between Victoria Park Lane and Rochester Avenue at the property located at 12428 and 12472 Baee Line Rcad (APN 227-091-14 and 15) for the construction of atrest improvenanis across tae frontage of said properly. (COatisued few MascD 7, 1990) RESOLUTION NO. 90-109 A RESOLUTION OP TH6 CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIAr DHCLARING THB PUBLIC NHBD AND NHCBSS ITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION OP CHRTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN TNB CITY 08 RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND NAKINC FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 2. VICTORIA P as .a A STER A E 132 04 BASH IN AOAD1 - Public Hearing of protests regarding Eminent Domain action to acquire public rlghL-of-way for the Baee Line Road, Parcel Map 11838, Project between Victoria Perk Lane end Rochester Avenue at the property located at 12504 Baee Llne Road (APN 227-111-12 and 13) for the construction of atreei improvsmant^ across the frontage of sold property. (Continued frw March 7, 1990) ABSOLUTION NO. 90-130 A ASSOLti.ZON OF THB CST:" gVNCZL OF Tdfi CITY' OZ AANCFIO CVCANONOA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING TNB PUBLIC NEED AND NEC699ITY TO COND61Bi A PORTION OP CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA ANO HARING PINDIN68 IN SUPPORT THEREOF 15^. 151 158 159 City Council Agenda ~ PAGE March 21, 1990 32 3. CONSIDERATION OF MEDZA_ OPENING A. PIN WITH IN MEDIANS IN THE TEARa VISTA P NN D COMMUNITY - An appeal of the Plan.^.!ag C---iNSion•e tlecleion to deny a median opening on Church Street between We9t Elm Avenue and Spruce Avenue. - __ _ _____ _- n Tha follosiaq itoA do not lgally require Any public LAaLiAOay, Altbough the Chair nap open the noting for public iapuL. 1. DISCUSSION OP DRDICATTON nP r~TVTn nvNmrn n i~ 2. CONSIDERATION TO PT PROPO SD WO PR POR AB 939 IaPCYC^ING L•'ISL TION1 - Presentntion of overview and i proposed Work Program of AB 939 to Ctty Council for i tRair cone idsration and sdoption. 3. CONSIDERaTION • PTI N OP CO NDATION9 POR ARTH DAY 1990 - Environmental Hanagemeni ComnLeion'a li recommendet ions for Council's conelderation and adoption regarding Earth Day 1990. R1RnT.11T TnN Nn On-l i~ A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCNO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOAN IA, i, BSTABLISHING AN ENVIRONMENTAL BILL OP RIGHTS IN RECOGNITION OP EARTN DAY 1990 AND TO ItfPLEMENT PROGiUfNS DESIGNED TO PAOTBCT TNESE RIONT9 I. COGIICIL aNRTNRAN The following Ltoa haPe boa rquaatad by iha City Council for diaeusaioo. Thy Are not public boring iron, although the Chair oy aqn the Natiag for public input. 1. STATUS RRPnRT nN mrrumv m we e..n ..... a...... ....--~..~~ ____ 2• DISCV95I0N OP LETTER SENT TO Omm gy CO N RRR CHUCR BUOURT 166 182 183 203 ens 207 city Council Agenda PACT MerCh 21, 1990 13 i, ~ Th1s is the tLe for City Comcil to identify the itus they wish Eo discuu a! the Wart Netinq. These itga will ao! be '~~ ~ discunad at thi• aeetiag, only identified for the Wert '~ eeeting. I i „ E. CONMDNICATTnww WI TEE p~ This is the tine sad place fnr the general public to addrea• the city Council. state iaw prohibits tee City Council frog addressing any iasne sot prwiouslp iaeluded oa the Agenda. The City Comcil up retei~e Leatieony and aeL the setter for a subaequeat retinq. Coaeanta are to W lialtad to fire .cant.. yes ladi.leual. T~ 10$TINO HILL ADJODRM TO A JOIMT NEETINO wITE TXE PDELIO SAFETY COIWIESION, MAItCB I8, 1990, 7r 00 P.M., IM TE6 MVSCAT ROOK AT TE6 RANCHO COCAININg11 NEIOHEOMOOD GAITER r I, Oebia J. Adana, City CUrk of the Clty o! AancAO CuCaepngar hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda wee poatsd on Nerch 16, 1990, eoventy-tvn rl9~ ~....... February 7, 1990 CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONGA CITY COUNCIL HINUTES Regular Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Wednesday, Februnry 7, 1990, in the Lions Perk Cgomunity Center, 91fi1 Base Line Aoad, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The roasting was called to order at 7:34 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Pseesnt were councilawmbere: William J. Alexander, Deborah N. Brown, chazles J. Baguet II, Pamela J. Wright, and Mayor pennie L. Stout. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Andrew Arcxyneki, Assistant City Attorney (left at 8:30 p.m. ); James Markman, CSty Attorney (arrived ac H:30 p.m.); Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Naneger; Jerry B. Pulwood, Deputy City Manager; Rick Gomez, Community Oavelgpment Director; Brad Buller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Prmmpaz ranwway n - ° .a.u ____ .__..~_ __..' °^^^°", Associate Planner; Cindy Norris, Aeaoclate Planner] Ruae Maguire,~City Engineer; Jerry Grant, Building Official; Jim MsrtSn, Plan Check Coordinator; Susan Neely, Finance Manager, James Froetr City Treasurer; Joe Schultz, Community Services Manager; Duane Baker, Sr. Administrative Assistant; Diana O'Nealr Administrative Analyst; Susan Mickey, Administrative Aida; Pntty Riffel, Executive Assistant; Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clerk; Captain Eugene Gilmore, Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Stntion; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. R • • • f } 81. Presenter ion of 10-yanr Service Pin to Cammleelonar Ada Cooper. B2. Yse sent at ion of Proclamation to Andres. (:w,3yi SvlGrzaDG. C. COI/IUNICATION/ FRON TIDI PUaLIC C1. Phil Will lame, 7251 Amethyst, asked 1f there was any way to puk the bike lanes bnek on Haven Avenue. City Council Minutes Februnry 7, 1990 Page 2 Ruse Maguire, City Engineer, stated there were no bike lanes previously, that there was uuiy e .huuldcz a*.; ni nn, but felt Haven was wide enough now to accommodate bikes. Arad Huller, City Plattner, stated the Trails Implementation Study was in process, and that it would be presented to the City Council when complete. C2. Aon Morrison stated ha Eslt he was getting the run-nround on the graffiti removal program because of differenC stories he was getting from the CLty staff and the Sheriff's Department etaf E. Tha location he referred to was et 26th and Center, south of Arrow Route (CSOSe Creek Village). Mayor Stout asked Jack Lam, City Manger, to arrange a meeting with Mr. Morrison to work out this situation. Brian c. Thorne, President of the Homeowner's Association, also commented on the graffiti situation. Ruse Hnguise, City Engineer, stated he ie not aware of nny request fot graffiti removal, but that he would have it removed within 24 hours. C3. stave Martino, 7698 Gnney Couzi, asked to be able to speak et the time the Nordic item ie hoard. Mayor Stout stated that would De tine. C4. Jack Lam, City Manager, pornreu wuu : vu. ' ..e ...,..a-.... a_c: _cr .._: a correction Ln the staff report and the resolution, whereby the name of stonegate should ba deleted from both. C5. Jack Lam, city Manager, stated Item F1 hoe been requested to be removed by the applicant. C6. Jack Lam, City Manager, introduced suean Neely, the CLty'e new Pinanee Manager. R e r e e D. CONBEN'P CALENDAR Mayor stout asked that Item DB ba removed for discussion. D1. Approval of Nirtutee, Jenvary 3, 1990 January 9, 1990 (BUqust absent) January 17, 1990 (Brown ebaertt) January 24, 1990 D2. approval of Nazrante, Register Noa. 1/17/90, 1/21/90 and 1/31/90) and Payroll ending 1/17/90 for the total amount of 52,560,822.75. city Council Minutes February 7, 1990 Page 3 D3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of January 31, loan. D4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting eide^ for the Area II, Amethyst Storm Drain and Street Improvement e, Phase I Improvement Project, located on Amethyst Street from the Fire Station and north of 19th Street to Highland Avenue, to be funded from Drainage Fund, Account No. 23-4637- SffbS. RESOLUTION NO. 90-043 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOA THE "AREA II AMETHYST STORM DRAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENT3, PHASE I, IMPP.OV5HENT PROJECT", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIAECTI NG THE CITY CLHRR TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D5. Approval to award and authorization to execute contract (CO 90-019) Eor the Haven Avenue Gateway Entry Monument Improvement Project located at the northeast corner of dth Street and Haven Avenue to Ronald Harris Construction for the amount of 5201,397.00 ($183,087.95 plus l0a contingency), to be funded with Beaut ificaticn Funds Account No. 21-4647-8719 (FY 89/90). D6. Approval to award antl authorization to execute a Professional Services Agreement (CO 90-020) with respect to the surveying of Public Warke Design and Construction projects at various locntione in the City to Wagner Pacific, to be iunucsu att.w u,a va~wu yw~e .. uw.......e e. .. •.o :.y~ccL :..... ~ ...G. D7. Approval to award and authorization to execute a Profeeeicnal Services Agreement (CO 90-021) with Austin-POUet Aaeociatee, Incorporated, for a traffic study for the proposed 8tiwanda North Specific Plan area. The consultant's fee will 6e $30,000.00 to be funded from a $30,000.00 deposit made by the Caryn Company. RESOLUTION NO. 90-044 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO AWAAU AND EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH AUSTIN-POUST ASSOCIATES, INC. POA PAEPAIUTION OF A TRAFFIC STUDY POA THE PROPOSED BTIWANDA NORTN SPECIFIC PLAN AREA D8. Approval to awer8 and authorization to execute contract (CO 90-022) for Maintenance Aetrafit Project and the Parke Capital Retrofit Project to Tnylor- Sha£ar, Incorporated for the amount of $563,175.00 ($512,013.50 plus l0a contingency), to De Funded from Maintenance Account No. 01-4647-7043 and Park Development Fund - Account No. 20-4532-7043. ITE11 PIIId.ED FOR DIBCUBBION 6Y NAYOR BTOUT. D9. Approval to amend contract (CO 86-055) for legal services. City Council Minutes February 7, 1990 Page 4 D10. Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 3 (CO 88-084) with ABL Consult inq Engineers to provide additional engineering services for supplemental studies required by the Sen Bernardino county Piocd caniroi Diatr ict fur Hermosa/Church Stntm Drain. The Change Order is for the total amount of $12,003.00 to bring the contract total to $105,874.00 to be paid from Drainage Funds, Account No. 23-4637-8761-4603-4110. n11. Annroval to execute Agreement for installation of Public Improvement end Dedication (CO 90-023) between Roee Martinez and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for street frontage improvements along 10296 Church Street. RESOLUTION NO. 90-045 A RESOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORN IA, ACCEPTING AN AGABEMHNT FOR INSTALLATION OF PVBLIC IHPROVBFffiNT AND DEDICATION PAOH ROSE MARTINBZ AND AUTHORIZING THB MAYOR AND CITY CLBRK TO SIGN SAME D12. Approval to execute an Agreement for Acquisition (CO 90-024) of otf-site Property, Security, and Deposit for Tentntivs Traci No. 13812 located wee[ of Etiwanda Avenue and north of Nighland Avenue, submitted by Watt Southern California, Incorporated - 9tonegnte. RESOLUTION N0. 90-046 A RESOLVTION OF THH CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO OFF-SITB^PROPERTY -SECURITY w AND DEPOSIT POA TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13812 PROM WATT SOUTHEPN CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED - STONEGATE AND AUTHORIZYNG THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME D13. Approval to execute Maintenance Agreement (CO 90-025) between Weirick Propert iee Limited, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance of an overflow channel nlong with the replacement and repair of fencing and landscaping within the City Orainngs Sasamant located on the southwest corner Of Lomita Couit end Archibald Avenue. ASSOLVTION N0. 90-047 A AESOLVTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OP TN6 CITY OP RANCHO v'dC'AMuNGA, Oiu.iFORRiA, i,PPFw'Jim: MAYN -Ro~.3NT WITH WBLRICR PROPERTIES LIMITBD, POR PARCEL NAP 12504 D14. Approval of lases/purchase agreement with Municipal seroicse Oroup, Incorporated for two (2) asphalt patch trucks. City Council Hinutee February 7, 1990 Pnge 5 RESOLUTION NO. 90-048 - - ,,,,_~,,,, „_ _.,,_ -___ mirzarit. nR TA6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ^CALIFOANIA,^r AUTHORIZING THB LEASE/PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT TNROUGR MONICIPAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. D15. Approval to authorize purchase of a prefabricated reetroom building, a Super Secure Hodel NP-1135-0, for the Stiwanda Nigh School Sports upgrading pro]ect 2rom sole source vandvr 'seu nm.ki.. su.....e....s.ee. D16. Approval of Film Permit Beee. RESOLUTION NO. 90-049 A RESOLUTION OF TH8 CITY COUNCIL OP TAE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CERTAIN PE85 AS DEFINHD IN ORDINANCB NO. 410, CHAPTER 5.16 PERTAINING TO THE FILHING PERMIT PROCESS D17. Approval to Destroy City Dacumente ae provifled under Coverrvnent Code Section 36090. R680LUTION NO. 90-050 A RESOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OP TNS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, AVTHORI ZINO TNS DESTRUCTION OF CITY UNO@R GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090-„ D 18. Approval to establish an amount required of a development ae a contribution in-lieu of the construction of Baee Line Road Street Nidening and Median Islands from west of Interstate 1S to Victoria Park Lnne. RESOLUTION NO. 90-051 A RESOLUTION OP TN6 CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAHONGAr CALIFORNIA, ESTAELISNINC AND ADOPTING A CONTRIBUTION ANOVN'f PERTAININO TO TN6 CONSTRUCTION OP THE BASE LINE ROAD NIDENINC PROH WBST OP INTERSTATE 15 TO VICTORIA PAA1C LANE IN THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAHONGA D 19. ApptOVal OI ReeOlaE lOn COnilrl9ing a City wwiG11 u6C uiGii xmv -.- .,.ary 17, 1990 for en eppeel of Planning Coamiesion Candit lone ,relating to Environmental Aeaeeement and conditional Uee Aermit SS-18 - DLVersified 8hoppinq Centers. City Council Hinutes Pebruary 7, 1990 Page 6 RESOLUTION NO. 90-052 a ng cni37minx OF TNH CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT atf-ie POR THE DEVELOPMENT OP A FAST FOOD RESTAURANT TOTALING 5,180 SQUARE BEET ON 1.24 ACRES OP LAND ON THE EAST SIDS OP HAVEN AVENUE HETNBEN LEHON AND HIGHLAND AVENUES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COM.~ffiACZAL DISTRICT, AND HARING PINDINGS IN SDPP01tT 'I'-ncREOe - APN 201-271-ab arv0 0/ D20. Approval to order the annexation of DA 88-19, located on the north Bide of 19th Street, giant of Ramona Avenue, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Liyhti.-.g Y.ai.^.tensnca nietr ict Noa. 1 and 6 - APN 202-171-31, 32 and 35. ABSOLUTION NO. 90-053 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY OP RANCHO COCAMONGAr CALIPORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPB HAINTSNANC$ DISTRICT NO. 3 AND STREET LIGHTING HAINTSNANCB DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DR SB-19 021. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for 13181 Victoria Street, autmiited by Jamee Henke, Jr. RESOLUTION NO. 90-054 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CnCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IHPROV8ID:NT AGREEMENT AND IHPAOVEMENT SECURITY FOR 13181 VICTORIA STREET D22. Approval of Mape, execution of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and ordering the Annexation to Street Lighting Maintennnce District Nos. 1 and 3 for Txsct 13886 end Parcel Map 11394, located at the northwest corner of Base Line Aoad and Btiwanda Avenue submitted by The earmakien Caapany. RESOLUTION NO. 90-055 A ABSOLOTION OP THH CITY COUNCIL OF THS CITY OF IUINCN0 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INPROVBMENT AORBSNBNT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND BINAL MAPS OP TMCT NO. 1308fi AND PNe.EL Mi3 nv. ...~. RESOLUTION NO. 90-05fi A ABSOLUTION OP TNS CITY COUNCIL OP TNS CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THB ANNEXATION OP CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTEHANCB DIBTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 POR TRACT 13886 AND PARCBL MAP 11394 Clty Council Minutes February 7, 1990 Page 7 D23. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance Oietrict Nc. 3 and Street - - - ------ - - 1 ~,.n 6 far Parcel Map 12058, located south _ ...y ...... .e....e ...-..~___ ...._. _.. of"9th Street between Lion Stteet and Hellman Avenue, submitted by Rancho Busineee Partners. RESOLUTION NO. 90-057 - ,~________, no mua OTTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL HAP NUMBER 1205E (TENTATIVB PARCEL MAP NO. 12058), SMPROVEHENT AOAEEMENT, AND SMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLVTION NO. 90-058 A RSSOL'JTION OF THE CITY COUNCZL OF TAE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, OAOBRING THS ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTSNANCS DISTRICT NO. 3 AND STABST LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL lIAP 12058 D24. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Bxtension for Tract 12671-1 thru -4 located on the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Mountain View Drive submitted by Lewis Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 90-059 A RESOLUTION OF THS CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEHENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12671-1 THRD _q D25. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tzact 13697 located on the eouthweat corner of Haven Avenue and Carrazi Street submitted by Daly Home e. RESOLUTION NO. 90-060 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGABS!ffiNT EXTENSION AND IHPROVSI~NT SECURITY POR TRACE 13697 D26. Approval to execute improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13715, located on the northeast corner of Jannet Street and Exeter Court, eudsitted by Walton Construction Company. REeOLUTION NO. 90-061 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COVNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIPOANIA, APPROVINO IMPROVEMENT AOREBIgNT 8%TENSIOq ANO IMPROVEMENT 9ECUAITY POR TRACT 13715 Ciiy Council Minutsa February 7, 3990 Page e D27. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for DR 86-27 located at 9133 Center Street, submitted by California Piniahed Hetale. NlisuLUT 1UN NO. YU-U62 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP TH8 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOANIAr APPROVING IMPROVEIffiNT AGREEMENT E%TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY POR DR 86-27 D28. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Haven Avenue Improvements located on the east aide of Haven Avenue between Church street and Haee Line Road submitted by Lewis Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 90-063 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFOANIAr APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTEN920N ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY POR HAVEN AVENUH IHPROVEHBNT3 D29. Approval to accept Improvement e: Release of sonde and Notice of Completion for: act 9225 locnted o th n rthweat corner of carnelian Street and Highland Avenue ~o.~,...... 2e.......~e....e ~.... (~ ~., L) . . ......... RESOLUTION NO. 90-064 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIPORNIAr ACCEPTING TH8 PUBLIC IMPROVEl~NTS FOR TRACT 9225 ANO AUTRORIEING TtIS FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETZON POR TA8 HOAX CUP 84-39 !DR 88-071 located on the east aide of Rochester Avenue between g;b Street and 6th Street Paithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 21,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 90-065 A RESOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OP TAE CITY 08 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIIORNIA, ACCEPTING TAE PUBLIC IHPAOVEIRNT9 FOR CUP 84-39 (DR BB-07) AND AUTHORIE2NG TFNC FILINO OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION POR THB NORA city council Minutes Febrvary 7, 1990 Page 9 D30. Approval to accept Improvement a, release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 12833 located on the southwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and South Victoria Windrows Loop. lda intenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 64,935.00 D31. Approval io accept the Vintage Pnrk Project in the Victoria Planned Community ae complete and authorite the filing of a Notice of Completion. NaJVLUTIVN NO. 50-066 A RESOL'JT ION OP TRH CITY COUNCIL OF TH6 CITY CF AANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE VINTAGE PARR PROSBCT ANB AVTNOAZZING TME PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION POR TME WORK MOTION: Roved by Brown, seconded by Alexander to approve the Consent Calendar ae corrected with the exception of Item B. Motion carried unanlmouely, 5-0. • R R • • R DISCUSSION OF ITEM D8. Approval to awned and authorization to execute contract (cro 90-022) for Maintenance Retrofit Project and the Parke Capital Retrofi! Project to Taylor-Shaferr Incorporated for tRe amount of $563,175.00 ($512,013.50 plus 30f contingency), to De funded frg4 Haintenancs Account No. O1-4647-7043 and Park Development Pund - Account No. 20-4532-7043. Mayor Stout asked for further explanation of this itma with regard to the retrofit. MOTION: Moved 6y Stout, seconded by Baguet to approve item D8. Motion carried unanimouelyr 5-0. • R R • . x Councilman Huquei asked if item I7, Nordic Updaia, coultl be moved to the front of the agenda. Mayor Stout agreed to do thte afies the Consent ordinances. R . . « • . El. DSVEIAPMENT AGR86MENT 87-01 - 6RSAT WESTERN HOTELS CORPOAATION - A request t0 emend the Agreement to allow a hotel within the Poothlll Design end Conmarcinl Cantor located south of Foothill Boulevard and seat o! Spruce Avenue. Dabrn J. Adams, Clty Clark, read the title of Ordinance No. 415. City council Minutes Februazy 7, 1990 Page 30 ORDINANCE NO. 415 (second reading) AN ORD INANCS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAHONGA. CALIFORNIA: aoownln vn. ,-,,,,,,,, nT ~~, 1 TO AR EXISTING DEVELOPMENT AGAEHMENT FOR A HOTEL WITHIN THE FOOTHILL OESICN AND fX)M!ffiACIAL CENTER MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Brown to waive full reading and approve „r„_„_ _e sic Mnt{nn carried una ni man vl.. S-n, E2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 89-02 - CITY OP RANCHO CVCAMONGA - An amendment to Title 17 of the Municipal Code by adding Chapter 17.24, Sections 17.24.010 through 17.24.090, 17.06.010.0.1.9 and 17.06.020.0.6; amending eubeectione 17.06.Ol0.E.5, 17.08.040.0 and C, 17.08.OSO.E.S, 17.18.020.D, 17.18.030.A, 17.18.030. C, 17.18.040.A.1, 17.18.040.E.5. a, and 17.18.040.E.5. b; and deleting eubeectione 17.06.0'_O.E.S.a through f, 17. 18.040. A.1.a through a and 17,18.040.E.S.a.i through iv, regarding eetabliehment of 9uidelinee end standards for hillside development. Debra J. Adams, City Clark, read the title of Ordinance No. 416. ORDINANCE NO. 916 ;second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO 89-02^„ANENDING TT.TLS 17n OP••T}D: MUNICIPALT CODE BY~ADDING CHAPTER 17.24, SECTIONS 17.24.010 THROUGH 17.24.090, 17.Ofi .Ol0.C.1.G AND 17.06.020.0.6) AlgNDING SUBSECTIONS 17.O6.Ol0.E.5, 17.08.040.8 ANO C, 17.08.OSO.E.S, 17.18.020.D, 17.18.030.A, 17.18.030. C, 17.18.O40.A.1, 17.18.040.E.S.A, AND 17.18.040.E.S.B; AND DELETING SVBSECTIONS 17.06.010.E.5.A THROVGH P, 17.18.040.A. 1.A TNAOVCH E ANO 17. 18.040.E.5.A.I THHOOGH IV, REGARDING ESTABLISHMENT OP GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS POR HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOP John Wong, 5436 Valinda, addressed the Council stating hie pcoject Sa afPectad by this Ordinance. Hs added it would coat him time and money in order to comply with the ordinance, but ie willing to work with staff on th!n :.___.._. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated 1f the ordinance le approved, Mr. Wong'e plane would have to comply with the reguletlone of the Ordinance, and added ha does not have complete plane submitted for the technical review process. He Eelt the problem with Mr. Wong'e unite was the height. Councilwaoan Wright stated mince the last meeting, she hoe had a lot o! her concerns addraeaed by staff. She added her only concern at thla lima la lot size which could be dealt with at a later dste. city Council Ninutae February 7, 1990 Page 11 MOTION: Movsd by Wright, seconded by Alexander to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 416. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. . • : • . Item I7. Nordic Update was heard at ihia time, but the minutes will remain in agenda order. • • ~ . . . F. ADVRRTI86D POBLIC HNARINOS F1. MODIPIf~ATION TO CONDITIONAL USH PERMIT 88-12 AND PARCEL MAP 11030 - WBSTERN YROPEATIES - An appeal of a Planning Commission deCiBion denying e request to modify a condition of approval requiring that traffic elgnale be conetrveted prior to occupancy of any buildings for the development of a shopping center and related Parcel Nap located at the northeaei corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Eculevnrd - APN 3077-421-36, 37 and 40. ACTION: Item withdrawn by Lewio Nosiea. f • R Y F2. O U T CF Staff report presented by Letry Henderson, Principal Planner. Councilwoman grown stated she and Rick Gome:, Community bevelopsant DLrector, have spoken with Michael Bair of SANBAO, who ie working with the conmuter rail, and was informed he would communicate to Santa Fe that Rancho Cucamonga la designating ihia site ae en historical landmark and that it should not De torn down. Mayor Stout stated hs ie embarrassed by this building because of the graffiti. councilman Buquet euggeated this building be treated with a spaei£ic materiel eo that it would deflect graEflti. Mayor stout suggested the City lease the building. Councilwomen Brown suggested Rick Ucmez, Community Development Direttor, wntact Mitnaea eau. Mayor Stout opened the meat inq for public hearing. There being nc response, the public hearing was closed. City Council Minutes Pebrvary 7, 1990 Page 12 RESOLUTION NO. 90-067 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP TEE CITY OF RANCHO .:,,RNIA, RECO.~,...... _ .... ............. ... ..... ..CCA. ... .. DEPOTV' LOCATED AT EIGHTH STRESTT,AND nARCNIBALD AVENUE, +AS VA LANDMARX - APN 207-062-04 MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Alexander tc nppro••e nn 7..~:nn u~. on- nfi7. Mnh:nn rann:M n ~nV m.... a~ ~ c_n. t t • • } M O. PUBLIC HEARINGS G1. TENTATIVE TRACT 13303 - LEWIS HOMES - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to deny a rsqueet foz a time extaneion for a residential eubdiv ieion and design review of 96 single family lots on 13.98 acres of land in the Terra Vista Planned Community designated Low-Medium Density (4-E dwelling unite per acre) located at the eouthweei corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Mcuntnin View Drive - APN 227-151-13 and 14. {COntinusd from January 17, 1990) It eehould be noted that Rick Gomez was not present in the Council Chambers at the time th le item was heard. •.aw.: ____ _ _ _ _._.L_..........d .... !ho .v o~nn fan !hn nl . Rw stated if the Council wanted to go ahead and approve the project ee the developer now submits it, they could do ao, or if they didn't want to deviate from the new street width standards, they could deny the extenelon. Ruse Maguire, City Engineers stated they would have to record the final map to comply with the tentative, and as soon as it ie recorded, they would nave to go through a process of vacaiinq away the street and suhntituting n paseo. He stated Chia Se relatively simple. Mayor Stuut asked if there are any other tracts like this. Brett Horner, Associate Planner, stated this ie the last one. Councilman Buquet felt wa should give foam the iime sxteneion Councilman Alexander stated Ae agreed. R850LUTION NO. 50-038 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 08 THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, DBNYINO AN APPEAL OP TBE PLANNING C0MMZ88ION'e DECISION TO DENY A TIME EXTENSION POA TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13303 -APN 227-151-13 AND 14, AND HARING HINDINOB IN eUPPORT THBREOe City Council Minutoe February 7, 1990 page 13 MOTION: Moved by coquet, seconded by Brown to approve the extene ion requeet and direct staff to bring Dack the paperwork to substitute the paeeo for orchard Street. Motion carried unanimously, 5-O. Resolution No. 90-038 was not approved. R R R R f R E. CITY IQRAOER'S STAPR A6PORTS H1. STATUS REPORT ON FALSE ALARM ORDINANCE AS RECOMMENDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL BY THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION (COelSaued frog INCeeDer 6, 1939) (ORAL RBPOAT) Staff report presented by Dunne Baker, Sr. Administrative Assistant, who stated he has talked with the Chamber about this. He stated the Chamber has made some suggeeiiona. He felt that schools have a lot of false alar:ae and they should be exempt from service charyee. He said he was trying to get direction from the Council and that they could come back with an Ordinance for approval. Councilman eugaet stated ha die agreed with the suggestions by the Chamber, and felt the numbers worked up Dy staff were reaeoneDle. The City Council concurred with staff's recommendation of ins Ordinance. ACTION: Ordinance to come hack at the next meeting ee originally submitted. Service Chazge schedule wilt also come back by Resolution. Mayot Stout asked for information to come back on other city cervices. H2. RE-ESTABLISH CABLE TV/PUBLIC ACCESS Staff report pre seated by Jack Lamy City Manager. ACTION: Council concurred that Councilmembere Buquet and Alexander would serve ae the Subcomalttee. f f f x R f H3. DISCUSSION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT STUDY STEERING COMMITTEE Staff report presented by Jnek Lam, City Haneger. ACTION: Council concurred that crown and Alexander (Council), and Glaea, Amodt, aim aoMGravu (puviiw saxety Cwwiaaiunj weaid 6ervs se Lh0 aL08riny Collmirtee. R R R R R f H4. AEPOBT ON ANNEXATSON 89-OZ BTSWANDA NORTH - Annexation of approximately 5,600 acme of territory generally located north of 24th Street and east o! the extension oT Milliken Avenue - Statue updeta and request for Council Subcommittee. staff report presented by Brad Buller, Clty Planner. ACTION: Council conCYrrad tnnt Stout and Suquet to nerve as eubcammittee. City Council Minutes February 7, 1990 Page 16 • • 1t R R Ir Hayor Stout called a recess at 10:15 p.m. The meetina reconvened at 10:27 n_.m. wish all members of Council present. • • • • • I. COUSC;L SUSINE33 I1. 5TA US O BIL AE 2020 (Continued from uanua ry 17, 1990) Staff report presented by Brad Buller, City Planner. Councilwoman Wright asked if on Exhibit A, were there five centers not in compliance. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated it ie the State that goes out and makes sure the centers are in compliance. Councilwoman Wright stated that while eke was attending the League of California Cities Conference in Snn Francisco, she was approached by someone who etaied that Rancho Cucamonga ie one of two cities not in aompliance with standards, and to at it wan the City that was the stumbling block. She asked for information to clarify this issue. Councilwoman Brown stated that the city may have to give up some of the standards it has set. Councilman euquet suggested that staff address some of Councilwoman Wright'e concerns and report back at the next meeting. He suggested someone from the ccmmiseion rome to Rancho Cucamonga and see what it has done for the quality of life. Councilwoman Wright stated she Se looking for information on how the City can get in compliance to meet State einndarde. Brad eu ller, City Planner, stated he would provide the information to Council. Mr. Trout addressed the City Council asking for a copy of the staff report. He also expressed hie opinion on this issue. ACTION: Staff to prepare additional information to came bnak to Council. • • • • 4 R I2. SlPBATE OH U86 OF RECYCLED PAPER (Continued from January 17, 1990) St aft report presented by Jnck Lem, City Hanager. Hr. Trout stated he wou1Q be submitting a report to Mr. Lam through Councilmen Alaxandmr regarding thL subject. ACTION: Report received and filed. City Council NLnutee February 7, 1990 Page 15 • . . . ~ x I3. W C IVE '-- --- i,LHS (Continued froe Novenbar 15, 1989) Staff report presented by Chief Donnie Michael, Pire District. Council discussed the importance of the wider streets ae it relates to emergency operations. unmrnw. u,...od w., Rom+ct: veconded by Alexander for staff to 9o forward with env necessary amendments. Notion carried unanimously, 5-O. f f• f 1 R 14. STREET NAMING - Report on the statue of the City's current street naming policy. (Continued !rn Jaavary 17, 1990) Staff report presented by Brad Buller, Ciiy Planner. Mayor Stout asked about the computer program for street naming. Ne asked if ae have a list that we can check for naming etreate. He didn't feel that our city was eo large that we had to have our street names on a computer program. He felt the City should concentrate on the arrests tact connect that were once part of tae three commm~ities. ACTION: Canaeneue to proceed with staff's proposed program. IS. REPORT ON T})E IMPLEMENTATION OF TH6 PROVISIONS OP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS REQUIREMENTS POR COMMERCIAL/I DUSTRIAL/INSTITOTIONAL BUILDINGS Staff report presented by Jack Lam, City Manager. ACTION: Report received and filed. w ~ • • ~ IS. CONSIDHAATION OP A ABSOLUTION TO DHSIONATH A DHLHGATE ANO ALTERNATE TO SERVH ON A COUNTY-KIDS SOLID NASTH TASK PORCH AS R60UIRED UNDHR.AS_939 - AH 939 requires a teak force W formed Lo aesisi Ln coordinating the development of AB 939 which requires cities to prepare a source raduMlon end recycllnq element. Staff report presented by Jeck Lam, City Manager. RBSOLUTION NC. 90-068 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL O! THE CITY Ol RANCHO COCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MEMSEASRIP 01 A 90LID HASTE TASE FORCE REQUIRED UNDER A.B. 939 AND DHSIONATING A RePRESHNTATIVH AND ALTERNATE PAON TFDS CITY OF RANCHO CUCA)[ONGA city Couneil Ninutee February 7, 1990 Page 16 MOTION: Roved by Alexander, seconded by Btown t0 approve Resolution No. 90-066 which recommended Councilwoman Brown ae the delegate and Councilman Alexander ae the alternate. f R f 1 R R I7. NGADIC UPDATE Staff report presented by Jerry Grani, Building official, who stated Nordic hoe not kept their promisee, and presented further information pertaining to the situations of the homes in question. Ne added it was hie opinion that the "BSd Builder Ordinance" should be invokes xor me two Nordic tracts. He mentioned Rick Gomez, Community Development Oirectorr hoe been working with Senator Ayala•s office and that progress ie being made. Mayor Stout read the followf.ng letter into the record whicR he had received today in the mail: "January 29, 1990 The NonOYnble Jerry Eavea Nember of the Assembly 66th District Dear Assemblyman Eavea: The Director of the Department of Consumer Aftnire has naked me to review _ J1.... •I nnY Vn~Aln ~ln.....sn" n.l n O V V Corporation,fand to respond to your recent Lotter wherein you expreeeea concerns the Boazd had taken no apparent action in this matter. Well I can appreciate the length of time involved Ln conducting these inveetigatione might give the appearance of inactivity, I can eeeure you that the mniter Se considered a priority investigation. In order to expedite the inveatigntione, tRe complaints have been divided between three inveetigatore, end we anticipate legal action will be filed. In fact, iho first of these legal actions is expected to bo submitted to the Offlca of the Attorney General in tAa vory near future. I have oleo been advised that staff Ln tM Honrd•e Southern Regional Office have been Ln contact with your Adminletrative Aaeiaiant, and statue updates will bo provided ae needed. I Novo inetruMOd eteff to conclude ~.,aaa ..-..astlgat Lora as y,:ickly .c possible. Thank you for the opportunity to addreae your concerns. If you need any additional information, planes feel free to contact ma. Sincerely, Mickey Natelmato, Chief Deputy ConetcaCtor's State Llcenee Hoard" Clty Council Minutes Pebrvary 7, 1990 Page 17 Mayor Stout asked that hie office be informed of Rancho Cucamonga's deeLree to also join in this action, and that Assemblyman Bader 6e informed of what Assemblyman Eaves ie doing. Councilman Buquet stated the Subcommittee has been meeting regularly with promisee being made and not kept. Be felt the City Council should take action to get things resolved. Councilwoman Brown added that Aick Gomez, Community Development Director, and otner staff have drnfied a preliminary bill wnicn was aenx to senator Ayaia'e office, Assemblyman Hader'e office, and Senator Leonard's office, and stated that at the Executive Board meeting for the League, this subject was brought up. She stated at the March 15 meeting, the entire Inland Empire Division will be voting to support this legislation to have the League lobby for support on this bill in Sacramento. She added that Larry Rhinehard trom Montclair, who is the State Director, will be going on April 27 to the Executive Board for the League of the States and aeklny fur ~ig:xal on behalf of the Inland Empire Civieion, that they i®sediately lobby on everyone's behalf for this bill. Rick Gomez, Commmnity Development Director, stated he spoke with Senator Ayala this date and wee informed that the bill was with the Leglelatlve Counsel and was being prepared. Ma stated he eaould have a copy within a week. Councilman Buquet atatetl they have been working with tna City of Coltor. also. Jack Lam, Clty Hanagar, stated he attended a Weet Snd Manager's meeting, and was having. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the Council were: Steve Martino, 7698 Ganey Court, of tae Woodridge Eetatea, stated hie house looks like it ie ready to save Lnto, but cannot be finaled because of the street improvements not being complete on Bermo9e. Me etnted he ie in a real bind because his loan approval ie caoing due, and would like to get en exception fraa the City Council eo he could go ahead and move in. Councilman Baguet stated he had problems with the City Council taking n different action when a decision might came back end haunt them. ayo- „- ., a..eta.: ....a --.. - Dava c~.a:.,...raa rc., a.__ ,...p _ _ pr__ ___ _~_~ etreatY Lmprovemenie, snd that ha would have a problem letting ~him~move in when it might hurt eameone 6eceuee it ie unsafe. Mr. Martino esked whet ha should do. Councilman Buquet stated he would buy another house based on the information and experience he has gotten from being involved in this. City Council Hinutee February 7, 1990 Page 18 Councilman Alexander stated Nr. Martino has the option not to buy the houee or get legal counsel, anC felt that if Mr. Martino was allowed to move inr where does the City Council atop in allowing others to do Chat. Ron Stein felt that if Nordic can get someone to drop out of a purchase, then they could get more money when they resell it. Councilman Buquet stated he felt if the residents that were Here tonight could go back and get oui of their houses, shay would do this. Larry Wilder stated he eympathixed with Mr. Hartino, but that he was in a similar position, and now wishes he had not gone ahead with it. He further added he had the engineer for ins project look at hie houee, and was told it wee not built ee it was engineered. He continued to give information on the problems he is having with hie noose, and ditl not feel the building inspectors did their job when they did their iuepectiona. Councilman Buquet stated chat ie why he Le suggesting the City hire Hr. Sullivan to do the inspection services. Councilwoman Wright stated she is concerned about Mr. Sullivan being neutral on this issue. Counciiman nuquet added he Fe it Nr. Sullivan was qualiP iad and would do a good job. nnnnnl l..nmen w.l ~h1 •a4nA iR Miv ahm+ld ho Al vnnvvvA in vvvnnH vv mvvl nn James Markman, City Attorney, stated it shoo ld be in private. Mre. Huggins felt it was necessary for the City and the BIA to expedite the pro6leme with Nordic. Sha continued to inform the Council about the problems she is having with Nordic. she expressed her concerns for the condition of Iron Mountain. It wee her opinion thnt if repairs are going on in her houee, a City inspector should ba present to watch them. She also Eeli it woe n good ides for the BIA to gat involved with this. Jen Wilder, Stratton Court, expreeeed her concerns for the condition of the street et Hermosa and Iron Mountain stating ens fe1G it was unsafe. Brenda Praecoll, Paradise Hills in Colton, elated they were having the ___ ruble=a i.^. Coito.^. a9 tna r .ins.^.te i.^. o~.^.C.^.O __S:_.^.^x. V^ a .hayi.^.g Bhe added there wee no way eha would have gone ahead with her home if she had known of the problems she would have. Mr. atone expreeeed hie concerns for the street safety on Hsrmoea. Councilwomen Brown asked if the Henlth Department was contacted regarding the sewage problem. City Council MinuLee Pabruary 7, 1990 Page 19 Councilman Buquet stated they were, and that they stated it was the homeowner's problem to solve the situation. Mayor Stout felt the etrvctural engineer should be contacted to ace if the homes are built ae he designed them, and felt Richazd Mille should tre contacted tc get the canpaction reports. Councilwoman Wright asked if the end Builder Ordinance allows the City to collect the fees for the hired inspector Lrom the developer or ewoeone else. James Markmanr City Attorney, stated he would check this out Mr. Stein stated evecyone apprecintee everything the City is trying to do. Becky Oliverr Stratton Court, stated she wcuid like to have hez house inspected by the engineer, and that she knows of other residents thnt would like their houeea inspected also. The Council concurred that it was the intent to have all of the houeea inspected. R R t fi • R The city Council adjourned at 9:25 p.m. to executive aeasicn. Tha meatirg wac called back to order at 9:40 p. m. R R R R R. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Brown to approve the hiring of Aobert Sullivan. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. Councilman Buquet stated the Subcommittee will follow up and report back at the next meeting. R • t R R fi I8. DISCUSSION OF WAYS TO LINIT TNS LSNGTEI OP CITY COUNCIL_MxBTINOS Mayor Stout suggested that Sack Lam, City Manager, check into whet other cities do on this matter, end report hack to the Council at tae next meeting. J. IDENTIFICATION Of ITBRB POR NBIT MEBTINO J1. Consideration to appoint acmeona to serve on the Routs 66 Preeervnt ion i Promotion Committee (Wright). J2. Mnlethion spraying (Alexander). city Council Minuses February 7, 1990 Paga 20 x e x x• x No cononunicatlon was made from tha public. x R 1 x R R MOTION: Raved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to adjourn to 8xecutive aession regarding the Santolucito Condemnation, 10005 - 10095 Arrow Route. @xecutive Seeaion to adjourn to a joint meeting with the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation on Pebruary 19, 1990, 7:00 p.m., at the Liona Park Community Center. Notion carried unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 11:30 p. m. ReepaMfully eubmittsd, Debra J. Adams City Clark ADDroved: Pebruary 14, 1940 CITY OP RANCHO COCAHONGA CITY COUNCIL/RANCHO CUCAHONCA COMMONITY POONDATION HINUTES Adjourned Joint Maetino Due to lack of quorum, the adjourned joint meeting of the City Council antl the Rancho Cucamonga Community Poundatlon echedulad for February l4, 1990, was cancelled due to lack of quorum. The Clty council was adjourned to February 21, 1990 nt 7:00 p. m., for a joint meeting with the Redevelopment Agwncy to be hold at the Lione Park Community Center, 9161 ease Line Road. Respectfully eutmitted, City Cleakw^~ Approved: 'a'.; Yebrvary 21, 1990 CITY OF RANCHO CDCAHONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGHNCY AND n•nrv MIMCIL MTNVTES Joint Heeiinc A. CALL TO ORDER A joint meeting of the Redevelopment Agency and City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga mei on Wednesday, Febrvary 21, 1990 in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting wee called to order by Chairman/Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present ae Agency and Council members were; William J. Alexander, Deborah N. Brown, Char lee J. Buquet II, Pamela J. Wright, and Chairman/Mayor Oennia L. Stout. Also present were: Jack Lam, Executive -irector; James Markman, Legai Counsel; Linda D. Daniels, Deputy Director; Olen Jones, Sr. RDA Analyst; Janice Reynolds, Aee iatant RDA Analyst; Uuane esker, Sr. Administrative Assistant; Patty Riffel, axecur rve nnnin~nu~p : . ....e ...-~..,,,,- ...L n.._ ____. _~ °~~^ o...R OnR:nn District; and Jan Sutionre Aeaietent Secretary. R R R R k B. COMMONI G'j'IONS [RON TBE PDHLIC No communications were made. x • • • • • Items C1, C2, pl and 02 were heerd and considered at one tile. C_STAPP AEPORTR - REDEVEIAPNENB AOENCY C1. CONSIDSAATION OP A DINT POWERS ACA88MENT Staff report prsaented by Olen Jones, Sr. ADA Analyst. RESOLUTION NO. RA 90-003 A RESOLUTION OP THA RANCHO CUCANONOA REDEVELOPMENT AOENCY OP THE CITY OT RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE JOINT POWERS AGAEPJ~NT CREATING THE RANCHO CDCAMOMOA PUBLIC PINANCIN6 AUTHORITY AND OTREA MATTERS RELATING TNSA8T0 Redevelopment Agency and City council Minutes Pebrvary 21, 1990 Page 2 MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by euquet to approve Resolution No. AA 90- 003. Notion carried unanimously, 5-0. f f R 1} R C2. CONSIDERATION OP ISSDING RANCHO RHDHVELOPMENT PROJECT 1990 TA% ALLOCATION PONOS Staff report presented by Olen Jones, Sr. RDA Analyst. RESOLUTION NO. AA 90-004 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CVCANONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OP RA!?CHO CRCAMONC.A, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OY ITS RANCEO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 1990 TAY ALLOCATION BONGS, AN INDENTURE, A SUEORDINATION AGREEMJNT, THRSB 6SCRON AGREEMENTS, AN OPPICIAL STATEHENT AND A EOND PURCHASE AGR68MENT, AOTHOAIZZNG THE BBBCUTIVE DIRECTOR TO SET THB PINAL TEAMS OP THB SALE OP TN6 BONGS, APPROVING TH8 PAYIffiNT OP COSTS OP ISSUING TH8 BONDS, RETAINING BOND WUNSEL, AND MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS RELATING THERETO MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Bsown to approve Resolution No. RA 90-004. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. • . . } . . D1. CONSI DEAATION OP A JOINT POWERS AGAHElRLNT Staff report presented by Olen Jones, Sr. RDA Analyst. RESOLUTION NO. 90-095 A A830LUTION 08 TH8 CITY COONCIL OF TN6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE JOINT YOWEAS AGR86MBNT CREATING THE RANCHO COCANONGA PUBLIC PINANCIN6 AUTHORITY AND OTRBRS MATTERS AELATIN6 THERETO MOTION: roved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 90- 095. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. • • • . } } 02. CONSIDBRATION OP PINANCIN6 AND REPINANCINO A PORTION OP THE AANCRO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Staff report Presented by Olan Jones, 9r. RDA Analyst. Redevelopment Agency and City Council Minutes February 21, 1990 page 3 AESOLOTION NO. 90-096 A AHSOLOTION OP THR CITY COONCIL OP THS CITY OP RANCHO LRCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FINANCING AND REFINANCING OP A PORTION OF THS AANCRO REDEVELOPMENT PRQ.IBCT BY THS AANCHO CUCANONCA REDEVBIAPMENT AGENCY, AN ESCRON AORSENENT, A SIIHORDINATION ]1GR68MENT AND OTIDIR M1ITTBR9 RHLATINO THERETO MOTION: Moved by Brawn, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 90-096. Motion carried unanimously, 5-O. # # R # # ~ E. 11DJOORIIMENT MOTION: Moved by Huquet, seconded by Brawn to adjourn the Redevelopment Agency. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. Meeting adjourned et 7:21 p. m. Mayor Stout called a recess of the City Council until after the meeting of the Public Finance Authority at 7:21 p. m. Reapactfully submitted, Aaalatant•8scretary Approved: City Council Minutaa March 7, 1990 Page 2 B2. Presentation of Proclamation Designating the Week of March 11-17 Girl Scout Week. Mayor Stout presented the Proclamation. B3. Hayor Stout announced the City will be celebrating Arbor Day on March 31, at 10:06 a.m., by planting a tree et Aed Hill community Park. • • x C CONNUNICATIONS FROM THE POBLIC C1. Steve Sopkin, 1717 Sunnybrook, requested the Pelee Alarm Ordinance be removed for discussion. Mayor Scout stated he would do this. D. CONBm1'r CALQlDAR Ol. Approval of Minutes: February 21, 1990 D2. Approval of Warrnnte, Regaster Nos. 2J21J9O and e'(2SJ90; and Payroll ending 2/14/90 for the total amount of $1,750,966.95. .va~..e..« a,.won,ne >e s von~~~..o ..~r._._. __ _____._ _.._ ____ ...__. .. 28, 1990. D4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for off sale Beer 6 Wine Por Mob11, Station operators Incorporatedr 8477 Archibald Avenue. PULLED FOR DISC088TON BY COUNCILMAN ALBIANDEE. D5. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off Sala Beer 6 Wlne for Hobil, station Operators Incorporated, 9315 ease Line. PULLED FOR DISCU88IOM HY COUNCILMAN AI.EIAIIDER. D6. Alcoholic Beverage Application foz Off Sala Beer 6 Wine for Mobil, Station OpaYHiOra Incorporated, 10677 Lemon Avenue. POLL® FOR DIECUEHION BY COUNCILMAN ALEIANDER. .. ,. Alcc..o..c ..a e_ - ~~•••«<..., sc. _.. _al0 n_ee_ far ^_*.i.^.a TO'_'.^. B^_uee, ay^e App..,......... M~. E. L. Corporntion,^9030 Foothill Boulevard, f102. DH. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale Baer a Nine Eat Lnq Plnca for Nowell'e Perm Bouee ReetauranY, Judith L. and Richard A. Howell, 8733 EL iwenda Avenue. D9. Approval to amend starting time of City Council meetings. Hatch 7, 1990 CITY OF AANCNO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINOTHS Reauler Meetln0 A. CALL T'O ORDHR A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Wedneadny, March 7, 1990, in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Rond, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Tae meeting waa called to order at 7:33 p.m. by Hayor Donnie L. Stout. Present weze Councilmerobere: William J. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet II, Pamela J. Wright, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. A18o present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Jemee Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager; Rick Oomez, Community Development Director) Ruse Msguire, City Snginear; Mika Olivier, 9r. Civil Hnginear; Walt Stickney, Associate Civil Bnginear; Brad Buller, CSty Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Silva, Reaabilitat ion Specielisi; Joe Schultz, Community Services Manager; Jile Hart, Administrative Services Director; Susan Neely, Pinance Neneger; James Prost, City Treasurer; Duane Baker, Sr. Administrative Ae ei etant; Dian® O'Neal, Adminietzat ive Analyst; Petty Riffel, Hxecutive Assistant; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Pire Protection Diettict; Lt. Bruce Zeiner, Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Station; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. Absent was Councllmsmber: Deborah N. Brown. ~ . • w • ~ The flog salute wee led by Girl Scout Troop 1083. . . ~ x el. Preesntat ion of Proclamation Declaring March 7, 1990 as Arbor Dsy Ln Rancho Cucamonga. Mayor Stout presented the Proclamation. City Council Ninutee March 7, 1990 Pegs 3 RESOLVTION NO. 90-097 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPEASECINC RESOLUTION NO. 77-5 DETERMINING THE DAY AND TIRE OP CITY COUNCIL MBETINGS pt0- Anormval Of resolution setting forth policy guidelines for acquisition and development cf future park fac it it tee. RESOLUTION NO. 90-098 A RESOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, SETTING POLICY GUIDELINES FOR AC(lUI3ITION AND DEVELOPMENT OP FUTUAB PARE FACILITIES D11. Approvel io Snit into a Landmark Alteiet LOn Permit Co nave the Ledig House (Landmark No. 13) from 5702 Amethyst Street to a vita east of the Rancho Cucevan9a Neighborhood Center and phyeicel alterations related thereto. 012. Approval of the Environmental InLtiel Study, Parts I and II, for iha Highland Avenue Improvements from Hsnaoea Avenue to Mayberry Avenue and issuance of a cetegarical exemption therefore. RESOLUTION NO. 90-099 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO STUDY AND ,ISSUANCE OP A CATEGORICAL EXSMPTION^POR THB PROPOSHD HIGtU,ANU AVENVB IMPROVEMENTS PROH HEPMOSA AVENUE TO HAYBERRY AVENUE D13. Approval to execute a Reimbureemen^_ Agreement far Undergrounding of Overhead Utilities (CO 90-040) for DR 86-13, located north of 9th Street, between Vineyard Avenue and Hellman Avenue, submitted by Messenger Investment Company - UR 006, RESOLUTION NO. 90-100 A RESOLUTION OP TINS CITY COUNCIL OP TH8 CITY OB RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING RHIMBllRSEMHNT AORBBMHNT HXHCOTED ON MARCH 7, 1990, MR UNDBRCROUNDING OY A PORTION OF OvsRaeAD b'rii.iTi-aS LOCi.aoD 'RTd we ..n S:..B: r SCT":.RHN VINHYARD AVENUE AND HBLLNAN AVENUE - D34. Approvel to execute a Reimbursement Agreement for UntlergroundLng of Werhend Utilities (CO 90-041) fox Dewlopmant Review 87-55, loceted westerly of Rochester Avenue, between 8th street end Arrow Route, submitted by TAe Kilmer Company - UR 005. CSty Couneil Ninutee March 7, 1990 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 90-101 A RESOLVTION OF Tun CITY mrrtaOl 1. OF TWR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AEINBVRSSMSNT AGREEMENT EXECUTED ON MARCN 7, 1990, FOR UNDERGAOUNDING OF OVERHEAD UTILITIES ON ROCFBSTBR AVSNUEr EETWEEN 8TH STREET AND ARROW ROUTE O1S. Approval io execute a aeei rroperiy Imya v.d.~eGt .G.-..- C_ ]rd *S_^ Agreement (CO 90-042) from Jemee eanka, Jr. for a single family resident, located on 13181 Victoria Street Deiween Etiwanda and Eaet Avenue e. RESOLUTION NO. 90-102 A RESOLUTION OP T[B3 CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCBPTING A REAL PROPERTY IHPROYENENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AORSStOINT FROM JAMES BANXB, JR. AND AUTHORISING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLEAR TO SIGN THB SAME 016. Approval to release bonds for Tract 12650 Storm Drain located on the southwest corner of Canistel Avenue and Deer Canyon Drive. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Storm Drain) $1&2,000.00 LaDOr 6 MateLlal Bond $ 91,000.00 ABSOLUTION NO. 90-103 A gESOLUTION OF THE CITY OOVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING THE FAITNFVL PSRPORMANCB BOND AND THE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND FOR TRACT 12650 STORM DRAIN 017. Approval to accept Improvementer Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 13270 Storm Drain located on the northwest corner of Church Street and Milliken Avenue. Release Faithful Performance Bonds (Street): Storm Drain Foothill $686,000.00 Storm Drain 81m $146,000.00 storm Drain Church $748,000.00 Accept MeintennnCe Guarantee Bonds (Street): , Storm Grain Slm $ 14,600.00 Storm Drain Church S 75,800.00 RESOLUTION NO. 90-104 A RESOLUTION OP TFffi CITY COUNCIL OP THS CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALI PORNIA, ACCEPTING TBE PVBLIC IMPAOVSlRNTB POR TMCT 13270 STORM DRAIN AND AUTHOAZEINO THE PILING OP A NOTICE OF COMPLETION POA TMS WORR City Council Minutes Marco 7, 1990 Page 5 D18. Approval to accept the Vineyard Avenue Rehabilitation, between Arrow Route and Poothill Boulevard, Contract No. 37-216, Improvements as complete, release the bonds and authorize the City Sngineer to file a ^Notice of Completion." RH50LVTION NO. 90-105 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TH8 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE VINEYARD AVENUE AERABILITAT ION, EETWEEN ARROW ROUTE ANO FOOTHILL HOULEVARDr AND AUTHORIL In,i 'a nE ~ILI n:+ C. ....___-_ __ COMPLETION POR THE WORR D19. Approval to accept the Hidden Farm Road Culvert, Contract No. E9-104, Improvements ae complete, release the bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion". RESOLUTION NO. 90-106 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAHONCA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS PoR HIDDEN PARM ROAD CULVERT, CONTRACT NO. E9-104, AND AUTHORISING THE PILING OP A NOTICE OF COMPLETION POA THE WORK ^2C. Approval to accept the Haven Avenue and 19th Street Improvements, Traffic Signal and Storm Drain Improvements (CO 39-031) ae complete, release the bonds and authorize the City Sngineer to file a "Notice of Completion^. RESOLUTION NO. 90-107 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPOANIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE INTERSECTION OF RAVEN AVENUE AND 19TH STREET ANO AUTHORISING THE PILING OP A NOTICE OP COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Wright to approve the Consent Calendar, including the addendum item, with the except Son of items d, 5, and 6. Hot lon carried unanlmouely, 4-0-1 (Brown). ^ " x • w e DISCUSSION OF ITEM D4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off Sale Baer 6 Wine .o. .,o.. , ,.o~.cr. Operators Irwsposated, 3477 Archibald A. a...... DISCUSSION OF ITEM D5. Alcoholic Beverage Application for off Sele Baer 6 Wine for Mobil, Stai ion Operators Incorporated, 9315 ease Lino. DISCUSSION oP ITEM D6. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off Sale Baer 6 Wlna for Mobil, Stntion Operators Incorporated, 10477 Lemon Avenue. Councilman Alexander atsted he had a problem with alcohol being sold at a place whore people wou14 bs driving Jmsedietely after tM purchase. City Council Hinutee March 7, 1990 Page 6 James Markman, City Attorney, stated there was not much the City could do unless the State did something. He stated the only way the City could prevent this wee if there was something in our zoning ordinance about it. Councilman Alexander stated he was not Ln favor of this policy. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet Cc receive and file items D4, D5, and DS. Motion cazriad unanimously, 4-0-1 (Brown). B CONSENT ORDINANC68 E1. CONSIDERATION OF FALSE A M ORDINANCE AND SERVICE CHARGE SCHEDULE AS REGOM_ LADED TO THE CITY COUNCIL BY THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION - Ordinance establishing service charge for the third and subsequent false alarm during any one year paricd. Debra J. Adams, city Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 469. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the City Council were: Steve 5opkin, Hij ac Alarm Company, reed a tatter that had Aean dletx ibuted to the Ciiy Council. He crated they are not against the Ordinance, but felt t::e alasm companies should have had the opportunity to gat Snvolved. Mayor Stout stated of all the alarm ordinances he has seen, ha Pelt that Aancho Cucaawnga'e wee the weakest. He added the reason Rancho Cucamonga was doing this was not bacauae of the money, but ao the alarm companies would educate their employees. Mayor Stout pointed out that Ealse alarm responses by emergency unite were creating unnecessary risks for them while driving in traffic to respond to these calla. He further suggested they Cry this Ordinance for six months, and for Hr. Sapkin to let staff know if there are problems with it, 6ecauee it could be changed nt a later date if it wee necessary. ~ Councilman Buquet stated there have been many mpportunitiae for alern; companies to come into the City to try to do something about this. He added if this ordinance waa approved, there would still be the opportunity to change Lt if necessary. __.,g mh........ of .*.caka ?rotactic.^. ^.•!C.. gta.ed tRie !e the first nn hoe heard about this Ordinance, and felt there ware a lot of lnndaqueciee wish it. He felt the Ordinance should be tabled in order foz more work to Da done on it. Ha oleo distributed a latter to the City Council fox Chair consideration. Paul O'Brian-Renzie, AP2 Alarm, etsted ha was not aware o! the ordinance until tonight either. Ne felt iM multi-Nnufe uniCe or multi-unit buildings were the ones in violation of the ordinance. City Council Minutes Herch 7, 1990 Page 7 Clyde A. Hoyd, Chairman of the Public Safety Commission, stated the Publ lc Safety Commission first looked at this issue Laet year, and had asked staff to inveetignte this matter. staff researched this, contacted other cit See for information, and then reported back to the Public Safety commission with their recommendation. He further etaieu its c.,....-.._- before the City Council wne being recommended by Doth staff and the Public Safety Commission. He oleo mentioned that the Pu611c safety Commission felt that officers have more important things to da with their line than answer false alarm calls. Ha informed the Council that the Foothill Pire Pretnne ion Oietrict had passed a similar ordinance some time back and felt it had reduced a lot of their ieiev a.arW"....._-... There being no further response, the public input session was closed. Councilwomen Wright stated she felt same good points were brought up that should be looked at, but felt some kind of ordinance regulating false alarms should 6e approved. Councilman euquet suggested thnt poceibly when there ie a multi-unit complex built, that we should encourage there ba one alarm company aerviein9 the ant ire complex. He felt the City should start holding whomever was reeponeiDle for these types of problems when they occur. Councilman Alexander Lelt tae information presented by the alarm companies was helpfulr but felt the Ordinance should go through. He suggested the Public Safety Co®ieaion do further work as needed on the Ordinance. Mayer Stout felt the approach the City took was intelligent, and that iE the Ordinance did not work, they would do something to correct the problem. Ne felt everyone should work together the next six months in working out any pro6leme with the Ordinance. ORDINANCB NO. 409 (second reading) AN OMINANCB OP THS CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OB RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIPORNZA, AMENDING TITLE 8 OP THE RANCHO CUCA1tONCA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDZNG A NEW CHAPTHA 8.46 HNTITLHD "SERVICB CHAROBS POR PALHE ALARMS" AND PAOVIDINO POR SBAVICH CRARGHS TO DEFRAY TtR COSTB OP PALBE POLICE ALARMS MOTION: Moved Dy Wright, seconded by Huquat to waive full reeding, and approve vrdinanca Hv. • '.rig ... .,.c,. _.: .-: m..niha fM -: •inu._ H,.t inn carried unenimouely,v4-O-1 (Brown). • " : . . . Pl. ~,9IOERaTION OB ENVIRONNENTA_ A98H6°MHNT AND ORDZNIi CE 68TAEZISHINO A pRODAav M7A MITIGATION OP 96IEMIQaT~i~Y HAZ}~pMUS Aa90NRY BOILIN08 8talf report praasntnd by Jerry Ornnt, Building Officlel. city Councll Minutes tfarch 7, 1990 Page e The City Council asked various quest lone of Mr. Grant to clarify the intent of the Ordinance. Councilman Buquet stated he would like to see some method of funding for the nece6eaYV renaire, Jerry Gzant, Building official, mentioned theta are Boma options included in the ordinance. Councilman Buquet stated he would like to sea eomerning worxed up in the city system to 6e more directly involved with the funding proceae. Mayor Stout opened the meeting foz public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Michael mane, Biane Vinery, expressed hie concern for the coat eaeietance to gat the repairs made. He did feel the Ordinance was important. Randy Fellman, Methadiet Church (CUCemonga Aock Church), expzeeeed hie concerns for the proceae end time Premea of the repairs. Toby Valadez, La Papa Market, stated ha has concerns with the funding eeeietance. There being no further response, the public henrinq was closed. .., .. .... •we m., sue. •no Cw.•.......... -..y.. 0.L... .._ ..~___ __.._ ___ _.__._ _.. studies to be done, would like for the City`to ,check info acme kind of ~a package deal for the funding, and to get the price of the study lowered. Jahn Petry, Corona Del Harr a new owner of the Thomas Winery, offered hie assistance with this project. Councilman euquet felt there needed to be some elternativea end more information worked out on some of the coats involved. Mayor Stout suggested thin be done in two steps or two ordinances: 1. Notify the people that there is a problem. Z. The implementation of this. lames Markman, City Attorney, atatai rho City was already behind in getting thin approved, but that 1! the Council wanted to extend the lima ftesrea, they could do this latex. Councilwoman Nrlght eeked 1f they could go ahead end approve the ordinance, with e Qirective to do more work on the costa lnvolvad. Dabre J. Adams, City Clark, reed the tikle of Ordinance No. 617. City Council Minutes March 7, 1990 Page 9 ORDINANCE NO. 617 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OP TNB CITY COUNCIL OP TRB CITY OP RANCHO CnCANON61_ CALIFORNIA. ANSNDINC TITLE 15 OF TR8 NuNICIPAL mnR HY ADDING CHAPTER 42 REGARDING EARTHQOAAB HAZARD REDUCTION IN UNASINPORCSD MASONRY BUILDINGS AND MARINO PINDIN63 IN SUPPORT TREASOP MOTION: Moved by BuqueL, Seconded by WriOht to wnive full raadinn and eel second reading of Ordinance No. 417 for the March 21, 1990 meeting. Motion terries unanimously 4-0-1, (Brown). • • • a F2. CONSIDERATION TO AVTHORIES CERTAIN SERVICE CHARGES AS DEFINED IN ORDINANCE NUMBER V staff report presented by Jack Lam, City Mennger. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 90-108 A RESOLUTION OP T98 CITY COUNCIL OF TRS CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, AUTBORIZIN6 CERTAIN SERVICE CHARGES AS CUCAMONCA HUNICIPAL CODB PSRTAININC TO SSAVICB CHARGES POR PALSB ALARMS MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 90- 108. Hot ion carried unanimously 4-O-lr (Brown). • A • R Items G1 and G2 were considered together. G1. ROAD. PARCEL MAP 11838. PROJECT BETYIBEN VICTORIA PARE LANE AND ROCNBSTER AVENUE 472 BASS a nbiw4 - 2uYiic B~arinq of pratest• regarding -eminent DomeLn action to acquire public rightrof-way for the sees Liles Aoad Nidening, Parcel Nap 11838, Project between Victoria Perk Lana and Rochester Avenue at tAe property located et 12428 and 12472 Base Line Road (APN 227-091-16 and 15) for the construction of etrwt improvements across the frcntnge o! acid property. City council Minutes March 7, 1990 Page 10 RESOLUTION NO. 90-309 A RESOLUTION OB TNB CITY CODNCTL OP mNE CI'!'? „^ RA::Cii0 CDCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING TEB POBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION OP CERTAIN RRAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THF. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ANO NAEI NG FINDINGS IN SVPPOAT THEREOF C2. MAIN ACTION TO ACODIRB YVBLIC RIGHT-OF-NAY FOR BASE LINE R07,Q~, PARCEL MAP 11838 PROJECT SETWSBN VICTORIA PARR LANG AND A0CFD35T$R 'VENUE (12504 RASE LINE AoA01 - Pu611c Heazinq of protests regarding Eminent Dcmain action to acquire public right-of-way for the Eaee Line Aoad, Parcel Map 11838, Project between Victoria Park Lane end Rochester Avenue at the property located at 12504 Haas Line Road (APN 227-111-12 and 13) for the construction of street improvements across the frontage of said property. RESOLUTION du. 90-110 A RESOLUTION OP THE CJTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO WCAHONOA, CALIFORNIA, DECLAI~aNG TNB PVSI~IC NEED ANA NECESSITY TO CONDEMQ A PORTION OP CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOGTED IN TBE CITY OP IVINCBO COCAMONGA AAD HARING FINDINGS IN SOPPOAT THEPEOP Mayor stout stated it has bean requested io continue items G7 and G2 to the March 21, 1990 meeting. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council wee: John Haynae, xughes investments, stated hie company had requested the continuance. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Euquet to continue the pu611c hearing to March 21, 1990. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1, (Brown). R R 1 f i t G3. CONSIDER TION OP A_ PTING RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING UPDATE D~RAINAGS PEES IN THE BTIWANDA AND SAN SEVAIN6 AREAS StaYP report presented by Walt Stickney, Associate Civil Engineer. Ruse Maguire, City Engineer, stated ehls has gone to the BIA, end thnt they wre in support of it. Mayor Stout opened the meeting Yor public heerinq. Thars Winq no response, she public hearing was closed. City Councii Minutes Nazch 7, 1990 Pnge 11 R860LOTION NO. 90-111 A RESOLOTION OP TRS CITY COVNCIL OF TRA CITY OF RANCHO COCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING VPOATSD DMINAGS IXPROVSIANT FHHS POA ALL DHVBLOPMSNTS NI^-7IIN TH8 BTIWANDA/SAN SHVAIN6 LOCAL DRAZNAGB ARHA OP TAA CITY OF RANCHO COCANONGA MOTION: Moved Dy Alexander, seconded Dy Wright to approve Resolution No. 90- 111. Motion carried unanimously, 3-0-2 (HUquetr Brown absent). H1. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the item has been resolved. • w H2. INTERCHANGAH ON TIDL ROUTH 3D PRSHNAY - Aecaessendat ion to adopt a tewlut ion to indicate to Padaral author itias that a onrmile spacing o! interchanges on the future Route 30 lreeaay Le eeeentisl to the City's tzeneportation program. Staff report presented by Sack Lam, City Manager. Mnyor Stout Hinted he felt the Aeeolusion wee too weak. .lack Lam added the following paragrephx NHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga hne expended considerable City resources within this corridor, and change in this designation will cause catastrophic aconomlc coneequencee to Rancho Cucamonga. RRSOLUTION NO. 90-112 A R690LUTION OP THH CITY COUNCIL OF TNS CITY OP RANCHO COCANON611, CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING TBE PBDSRAL BIOBNAY ADMINISTRATION'S D68IONATZON O/ TB8 AOUTB 30 CORRIDOR POA TNO- NILR INTERCHANGE 9PACIN6 NOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded Dy Alexander to approve Resolution No. 90-112 es amended. Notion carried unanimously, 4-0-I (Brown). • • • ~ city council Ninuiae March 7, 1990 Page 12 I1. DISCOS O O S WIO% -Information outlining actions taken by surrounding cities. Staff report praeented by Jack Lam, City Manager, and Diana O•Neal, Admini etrativa Analyst. Councilman Alexander stated he would like to see this referred to the Environmental Management Commies ion. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Nriyht to refer this to the Environmental Management Coamieaion Eor further investigation. Hot.ion carried ~.-,a.},ya,. ly, .-v-i iorawni. : • • • . : I2. CITY ADDRESSING POLICY Staff report presented 6y Jerry Grant, Building official. Mayor Sioui suggested we have n plaque effect with contracting background and numbers. councilman euquet felt the placement of the address on the buildings was very important. Mayor Stout felt the 6-inch numbers should De used with the plaque idea, and Chat a visible iOCeti4:t be aetebliehed by the City Planner. councilmen Alexander stated hs had concerns about the sizing of numbers in rwlaH nn to thwl+ diw+.n~w +.. rho w+.ww+ ww i+ ..w++etnw +.....,et,...a .: nttt+.. s same. Mayor Stout asked that this be considered ae part of the Ordinance. Jerry Gtant, Building official, stated if the Council wanted to hove a curb painting program, that they do this with en outside contractor. Mayor stout suggested this be handled through a Fund raiser for a service organization. Councilwomen Wright stated she would like further information about contract curb pointing versus service clubs. Jerry Grant, Building offlciel, offered to look into this. ACTION: Item to come beck et the April 18, 1990 meeting. . • w 13. CONSIDERATION TO NONINATH A CITY AH SHNTATIVB POR TNH SOD'~'NBeN CALIFORNIA WATBR CONMITTH6 9teff report praeented by Jack Lam, City Nansgez. MOTIONI Moved by Huquet, seconded by Alaxendet to noml.nate Feya Myeze Dsetzup. Notion carried unanimously, 9-0-1 (Brown ~. City Council Ninutae earth 7, 1990 Pegs 13 • f • • R J1. Councilman Alexander Baked that the issue of the County AS 939 Taek Force ba fliecueeed at the March 10. 1990 adjourned meeting. R • ! • f f x. cDNMDxlcxriais mow Txs PDaclc No communication was made from the public. NOT10Ns Moved 6y Alaxmdrr, aaconded by Wright to ndjovrn to Executive Seeeion regarding pending litigation. xxacutiw aaaaion to adjourn to a joint meeting with the Aencho Cucamonga Community ioundstion on March 16, 1990 at 7s00 p. m., to be Reltl at the Poncho Cucamonga Neighborhood linter. Notion carried unanlmouely, d-0-1 (Frown). Tha mwiing adjourned ae 9s53 p. m. Peapactful/y aubmittad, Debra J. Adams City Clerk Approved: 1 p a e O e amehoa•oamohaN a•-mooeo ° o o O erooma e. o r r NNN rN •NN r T N i i i nn.. N rv nor;nN nn c42 ~ T .. a T N .. r WY n n n n A ~ Y A n n N a ~ n A A N N 1. : i iw • w a w • wwwwwwwawww o JN Nm Narho N Nryr mPO..rvN•Nmhm errvTlNarmaerNmanmrmwerrv ar rvrrN maa N NT MN N N NNNNNNNTmmmmTTmTmaaaaa•aa NNN N N YY i Om mn mPPr Mmmm1 1 a N 11a NNNNN N NNN aaaaall•a11 N ry ryryryryryryNryryryryNNNnNN nnNN 11a•aaVlaaaaaaaaaaaaaYaaaaaa rY 1 I I I I 1 m O L i m I l0 m • ••m • • aWham •m S aO MOPw OY 1 ~ p h I1 V O< WNIr Tlm=• nFw Oin Yr\\ Z2 UUNn NJ ~ r W m O\ N\r N w m w rNN i N w VLN 7hM N • fT\T i m aN• NN\\ Nip MNNN _ a N O\NNm • ip• J ••T OOL y p r W L _ :WW S _ WW w MS m ~L p :Na V\ V V2v NV v N w °~ hJ hi° _ ~ OW OYW O WN WUw •UYTW JI iel lPtlOry .~ \ .• N _ ~ nVmw•YU Oh W NN~/I _ V n 7•fe • N •[ 6 O Y ryii JU iW 00 ! N NMN LN VNwN Z Jf wfJ LLW ~~f 1i1 M W> N 1z\ i ~ p ~ ~ JJUY WW ~N \ wu<ru \ V • LNN O J~moNj ~' • ie L •• i i T W r p Nr ~ ~ i iril Yi Fihw a. Z ~~ ~ . OI i _ w i \ _p t> _ w ~ • _ L LOm _ J_ V iY h•J OY L N J V Y \ r•[ F ipYl' O ~J L OY~ ~~a]O X • ZO O 6 L ~ W O NOON l1 •aNN Y Y= LrWrL N Y WO LWU h P NiOrOJO pFr pN 06 OhUi\ V M1 N =iWWN\JJ OOmmN hm Yr2•y WSY00 Z06W f4yNm wm>sw pp mWhNrv .u ~u z ; N2 tl Noem. ° p == F W hiC° °oe ii ei .Y.u e`i >w owa < N ° V LL N4e • 'ZiW<f WWN z IU i rohz+ ~r z JIYh•-VY>J06 i W ° < p U ^ n • • = yOrp pom LO? f i WO<vh2<6JN O~ Wma•p <w 3L N pW NiWZ6NNWpm Y. rr~NZ32 2 • o V •ow ru, o _ _ mh N~F Y!m OwJi W ~ ~ YfiOtl°WOOw¢ F 1 ° i ?WMV ONwWYw ww wwtN~ wJ p~ p p N N hONpaw aVa6 .uNmO UZ0m6VJOVCtJp66< piNV V 2 O ~ LL 2 w• < 2 _ y N o V _ Z u wN f Q a W h U V V wJ O V mN i h u LL N Z rv V• i QINY W=Z • i r i W 1-W Z O< •p> m = J• Z 6 r • •tlJV Y O p M W •UMh N~2 _ _ W~ 6Cwi~WVOw 9 N Fry FV • YW J 2 VFN Q O y•~i 06NNLW0=Y J JJ 1 J U h U m <W NVNi LLN j •pNYOV 9iN YWIN ~ JUf «4 N iWfNONNw•Nr<2>F U s14ZWZi Y ¢ a ~ W y VV SS W N . 2 JW 4fVLh Wi SOZ„M ~ • Y Y Y Z S~ Oi0 JON r < W iOOWpV6i NiYW i J9J<ViMW WIwW009L Np MZwf N`J N N N f W Z1 L<W UWN LNL YML>J WVWY YWp uNO i • • X P i O i O i O Y • Y s fY VhW W• il0 'J 'J NY LS L 0 LYYMO7t hOWiO Sf iMWM jMN OtLWW<WOfi• F W NfOLm O Y V V V ; W L6UWVff Oil ! _ l W~ OSOONN M O ~aJi6N ~T i • • 7 i • iOW O W l M L M i i p Y2J4J OM M •••OWrLM Y N i04M J M pei yy i ~u y YY pi yi ytl JJ1 p Y ~ ~ Yi± W W W: i N NWLliWVN \ . JJMm pYVW MVOf NNiY~N4YMOW • 9vt9fY NWIY :: OUNJJiaWtN90fIOMOYY• f<OW •SY 11 l 7 l J V L VNWIYVM>JJ• ylf « <OOffO0Y0Y01001uVV000u II YE• P ~ p » N MO»nO1NrFla w•M1NO•Ia •ONNONTNrTmwlOrmPPrrr Y0Y Y N wl ar1000MN q0 YrOOryOVOONN00000wOONP IIOX N N y NOwIM rnIVNNN TOONNOO! N ON mwOIOOMOa00 ^W: N M M T NN m TTM NAN NM y N NTNN TN •>X Y Y NW WW W fNNOONN/YYOONOWOr.1NVOb.•NPrOY.IN PPwN01) PNO •O •rYONWNIOYNbWONN10••N W.. ••OO NPNWNNWIPJPOOOPpOfV W~f nNfNfOYNOO.Iw wNOPNNpWWOVPWpPONJOYOrWNOrNOMNNWNiP ZSOPPOPPTTTTmmmmm00000000O000Pnnnnnnnnnnnnn Z>n<On)> nmAnnmNtir>nMnmmmmm »> CCCCCCOOOrnNSm 0<n:Nr «ZPm>)ZZilPA09y9nNNmnP°1r m<2!P`yrnnn<ir>S.ImZ _ •. iNiA•NNmmm~ Y•1°1Tim)<SNnM >N y V ZrLiOTn~<><:RyNAi:mmiOMMMSP> OmmR~TT~~ii~ny CAC 1>A Zy>P.r r O >N ANOy nNrr PA000(1l SOPNOP 2 2PM0 rn OrNNfIr NP OZ >`IN!)iOPONNP .222•IN Z= !u C >n pZm>.N LINA !Zr )MAP. rO immmZ• OYN POPOnP i N O <>m AY CNOrlZm ylC1» » !y nYOCN ZGyNrO A inNmNRYRn°nl'1NyCmylZNrN(1 •Imi NO>y -• T OCA YiIANVn _2_!02>m AACT<PPPwr~m~~~r <nni <OZONU ~~~~- -- r OO OZgNA y•Ii mmmnn y~OACT\>COmyN OPZNC >O r N>2> PZminAYN LAN P »4 °Pn>NmCf• iA 1 .f mcy APyJNNNy> a os: slai sey z emr ml° r AoP oNLi an T<i .•yycm s c mN °°N> ny. NnA>z Ny <PrT mmmn ~iN m'.m n0<IN m MNmO SN Y= APA T~. i =n m? i • i• mAP CON< O C O rC . S N = ~ P^ m yyy N n y i Acn r ~ z r r m Iz N O1'«ilAi~oAm sainn«<mc'"eOSir°-~`P Oiiaiz~°.eu~A.ieir~Nio•2.>m A Z•>immAZ• AMnAi°°TrSMAi00AAN1°OPNOIOPN ACZNT >ionr2nnR~ r}~'n.°.mNymYi .rN nTZN n_ OS°>rOiNOOA AfnPOC PmZ O•IO Pm y NrwyTMrAnrN >Z>rP>rOOPVrN.I)imr0 AACymZ«OI>'.NPNN Tnrmmm mZimn°NAOM yNNVV NA)Ym)Z Zn >SSCy ZOnONArOP NZN~ <>20<TI NT M ^> iZNm9 •O 1 n°i snizaNeie2s'~+i».yi .<.m eco<NT ilm-ii ~• o s RrirN m m<yi^N .TN N1nz °L•Pw mAemNn: ie w~NAi NNZ m N rG •my NrrN<NZ ZO 1AN ZO m m Nw'=mNOOZ•P N nlj~ mN ZNAUr<1N011•N 20 OZr Y _ CTT~y NCi< m r 1mO PnfOM r F^ '11V< f is N !OV P «NA m^~ROO~ • y < < _ n • ri c Pfy ••• r < li osi s :m rCC W_ :Y MONO n » P`ZlO~ O •1 • TO AG < H AN~m~N ~A 71Z1 m TI'•A• A f yN iN F r ~ An ~ n r e i ~ a ~iP .rn s)r ~e~ o ~« sw s° ~ r r P n N Pr P NN < s r fa >m NT m_p liZy P< f (1V O C N m•Z•P Jn P :P )n Y N S LT O N iyn n C NZ m .1 \ rN O m V \ 2~> < WP S y<N • A n \ 00 .• • NNp_N T (Zl o NO 2 < « < • P f<> •PP « •n >fffff!!f!!P!!f!!!!flllffffllllfflffffflflflPlf!!O NNNNNNNNNNNMNNMNMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN< NNMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNMNMNNMNNNMNNNNNNm 00'O VJOdNiOUiusO PPPPPPPRNMUNMNNNUU!!A OYPNIWNrOa i.IPNIWNNOJOyPNIWNPOUf JPNfWNYOffYPNPWNY000r •• NPPN O rWNN WNN NOrrPFN OWI ••W fr WWmmYP• •PmPNNMWNOmO NW•Irm mOs yoVW NWOOPO VPOONWWNN 00000.•N rW~•I~r OJNfM NOMgNNOmNOOPNOOmWNPOONOIPNOOOOONOOOIWOO<WOPNNI0MON0 T 1pr` NO Ay° °P °n> •. n O O ozn <ilr5 «Z P E maaaeamNNmeNeoNmPNM1foaeemepgmPePma T mo o o q e e e aNmaooPeeNm¢nnN e n 4 Y + i T .. N44 ~ .. H aT i n "' i i o e4NmfNanmPmYNmfNanmwe4NTfNanawmyNTlNanmPO INanSw X X ~~~ TTNNNNNNNNTTTmATTTTTm• iVf1i1 Pmmmme e O T m il mTTmmTTTT m i TTTTTTTTTTTmmTTT NNNNNNIm'INNNNNN:NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN Ofiif1i1i11f111f iff1i11'Ii1i11iii• •If111f11V11fIfi11 Vm. • l !. m iY l >~ u X w h mT L a as ~ X in > u w Z X i r iif. ms J V ¢ W X T V ii0 PW Y n V n I V h_ tl f <wi eLL O im W W s w e Yi< W F' MqK „ ~ tlNNFSO f 4 _ On LLf ~ ^ t » V O a fON Of0 >i W • JWJ J N W ¢\ N V W IX lNISNh O N W 3YQ niNw SSW 1 OWp~OWhY W WWV W >%N W OwNwyW • N aiN< fV N y•i UIYU V UV JpWYiOYV ' 14N=^Z OzJ3 zz wJ 4; !I i siN F<J ~O• 0N=6J N NwHU uhS y~'•OO~h> < JWLLi~ N V h W N„ Nh wWWW LLsLL wW-- s { IuYO z N; .oWYtlzN N M ~ s ¢ e_. __ •OYO i _ h \hih. _ nW UW NY¢>~ .[CW N F ¢ u Yj y VM LL wNwh N w ¢H 4 _ 6 NW4¢ w4 .{ OOUOw=¢ i I;NW inW ZNZ N Y _ m< ¢l . lM Y Z J _ _ _ nLJZZ i F ¢! w% Yi l fl i .LL 2SLLZ LL O O N Y nY YJCWw<¢ia[W YM eWww .n'1tl nllVh2w6%WSWWOO \ ¢N¢U <6Qy LJ yWV¢J JJJJ Z .N+JOY<a J W<JZ U' NNq C u J j ¢ u¢VU3=0yU%~ NF~nV;UV' 7wS lJOhi J 32F2u.. h¢ JiOU• NJVYnNOIe~Ui4tMN SwJwS¢'J LI-iYONL Z<LS WZiCU S JWtIZNiPLLYNi 1p U p OyWw<f\W "JpwW JWJiVpPWwlwwn0 L¢¢VpWOViW %Nif 3>K¢¢pYyy>p »mLLVZN¢OVOwNLL UM¢ZZN>Wp < M < _ N e01 ' U H r y u NN • • n 26 UU h3NS ~wYN J _ i +r J31-1- > 3 _ U u O n _ _ _ _ • •r rn u~ ~• 0° w•V •O NMUV hNWJYw• > ¢ X X ~ VJ¢ 6ZFV0 » YN •• OaMN O Y YWVJ J X Lwpu i. u~~ .i-o V<4C NNYLLLL J.Z Yf C i i< V • V W <lYtli OD NJ¢ . i ~W pZWY ~„ • hG>Z jFNNN WJNS I> i<slY NV . 05Ww<V ~ = J<N .NNZW;tYO OJJ OJnNNZ.t< W Yh3pY• i W>VN " ^ X N Oy<phV \.WJIOhU 6 i J « < WUV4 tlIVNO <N iN O Np¢UZ 11 _ 3.. 3 p lJOhf YOYM.3.lU~W NOODUNOYWN~~WN >WNiO > iJ i YI V 9 : y jJOtF I O q<M .Y 70WVY J00 i60LLLLiJ¢JM9 j l!- h< 1-O< VNNN X ~J M J U6VlWi •JlWO\ON VIWppLMGUL •WY~ J(~rNO hNF H O : X tJ M .JFh 6F N hi<>SO .Y Il i YWW LL tUlY J \S! •LNY>;OOY O Y! IIWI p pp y ~J_ 1y y I OQWMNNiWNVSVW~MiNY33~U:<NMJ)jaNMMOW ~WiYh tlf Fia tl hOON M1NSWZiM;¢NY.OYZV.fihUNiY OFhUY.NWONliOM009M01! FM ;;'9y y y jjj W W ~ i t Si ;S• 1 NN 1 L 1 t . { JJJJJJiilii i Op000illlLlll6llS! X :511 p11 Naf aPNTNPyaiOymmPOTiPaTONONa.iNyhP.NiNhPM1NaNOTNTTO. MfNPOyy.namNM>yPfPOOnNa01.«NN4 N~yNO50NTMtlNNOM000MOmM ~ZX i NTTaH~NMfnNNNNN MP S naT yw Na 1 N yO nnPy N P ,w: w .. M Ty .n . i . .. .r y TTT T N ~ •Oir•wOmWmN~•OO~i~OJOONNMNYMPNtlryNVWWWWPOWWNOmO~YVY{N NNMNP PWVVONNNNNtlNHNmONNpNN{NP cz mmii~i ~icyoiryilii 4N NNNNOOOOOOOmiisiiio.b•.imb mimi `~yv•R. °simwy~wNic~nesPy~~icD ec nnnnli elizzszT4 ml+m mO F~ msi=zi+nii+lg-P~~n«€s~OAiii1211 rxilm~~~i~.°~m•°.«mm+r«n-ci ic.u <xn _ma mr pn M=•DmLNmTT~Mry•MAm•s cr NL _ S Ni99Nrna ~• OOD~11 TT OLLRSOSN nY CZmnnrANi~Y•rD~• ZMyATMbOnnmmAmm10.b00•nTrm1TT w PiOmO m<•iN ZiC >O>ZNP>POOOOOmDZZnpmmpP Sm >9C Z•Nmw yV Oym PTr nN>4rrwwNwwOZ000 ZNr CyD yZ4 r~N m~OiN~ •O~tw ~Z~ATAO>TTOOODDZrPf•mnrTmnmm OA N_n_On N y wPN ~••2Z 2 O OnOm9y N ~ nO9y0y yT2 nZ ~1~4 Z C4< >mANZrPZm ON w00 nONmmlllll ry4TA lm wm SON rs::c:i oz z: m„mw•°.ys • 1°0 .°0 :; ~°.~ m~••, °m O NC Nn Mw O4u>i002YiZ2 00 Y y Nr Z 2N • S2xn•••••• ii-• P 2 O 09 LN O ~ .ly nnNNNNN nnR n M • f V 9 OOSSSSZ ~ _ ..°n C rrr Nr >.»> nnm r r C_C_C_C_C_ y >tOT~0~30f>Vpml~> OZOiPwPn~oTATtlNO)ri Z•<•rm i Nr>. .'. cn i~myiPmN~iowl iTx2mmrry>Nmory2 N42ZSZ9NZSOZAOmZniNAnn>m yWVWWVOCNMtlZ<Zn40m2N nm4y>NOAn094PNNVfMnAC20iy200000CZnn\ Yf Oyn f •Sy>PPfPAONO N_rrOy AO CAC< VOfrPAZmf if mf m•O•I_NSnirA>i~AVOi NmOnA\_Y !'~4 M10HNOAmOiVl2Aml~m ~f OICZANPZIZ9 AiZ~b ~i>Zn 4\{PmtlnM\~1it~filmZ4i1Z'11 N Im9 __ZVm IOyO wOiryZNOtlVNN~Oi NO>ZA\y SmN r TPV > C •i >C4A24VVOVP4 ri• 4~NNMfOMmiO iNA TN 4Npi A iNNN •AV44N NN :TNy Cmr TCmOT OJ OA4T O<A WP •NIAAZONCZ CA ZrONAN iMN •j ZO ON ZIM :MZA\y •Z > <O TO IZNMIPAT ~nN<000~f ~ 4 Z•N lV •P •NN ZrC POZAZ>p A1•NN W:N if• <r >~r~ nP OON TOONZnOZ O _ NAn4PNNl PN• AAOA AA Zn •F IOiMAAPHANO ~ZNm myN \r M> i4 yN Vy~ Z OMO.OAb r m T Nury MP Nf PI• V Z< N1 C rN Nn N n VZ IA 20 O PPWPMyI \O r _ \• 1 _ b yl AZ P P OP Oil ~T rlZll Y N rN_ i uy 4 P W ~M M M4 W n ~~~ r C W • n0 AO Z \ <1 NA 4> N4 4 m w 4i i 1 IV T4 i i i.. s~ ~ wi m n n o m .• P x N P a •• • < b••ba m.a P •• • n > •{••P{{{{{PPSPP•P•1P{PP{{IMP{P{{{{{P>NPP{{P{{{D NNIWNNNNNNNNNNyyyWVlNi1W YVWWVVWVWWWWWVWVWWWYWVWWT tltl••oOSSO>mm4VVV4VVVVVPPPPPPPPPPNNNNNNNNNNN •WNNOOOVPN{uNNO<OyPN{VNNOtlOVPNPVNNOtlmVPNPWNNOr 9 P PN N• •'NPNNNVN NNN wPNWNNNWrW _ NY_P n{ynnuu gOTWa ~•4 Sr{9l•O'SW ns-a.-_.r _~_ - 'oix aVPNMpOWONVJPOM000ApNOyWNNWPNwONWVWPOWWmPOOWV N NWMOOONOOPNNONO00>OOOONPPYOOOVOONPPONP NOOYY T w Y NT .moy OT_ OZS O>O \Nn O>C Vin \ys ONi O = O °0 0100 AMPNONOPOOaOpOaNP.0000000000000M1P000.°0i 0 0:00 ~10NOPOOm000AtlNN0°OOOOOOOOOOOOry000A00N _ Na.o ».•i v. z:iPp°°~'.°.~e~°..° n~ 'tiTM-~NNr: a'"r°uJnae N~ a a N ~oaw N N .. .N tltl :•Nir eo.n.N i n ii: r wa.•+P N .. .• N ~ . •>. w ~i n JNN aw••a11• OhOPO.NnN anmPONNTaNtlhmpO.NTinOhOPO.NTiMtlhmPp.NAiN m ~ DOOM....rYn.NNNNNNNNNNNnmTTmTTAATiaa1:: im nT ry wNN NNNNNN NNNN n N NN Oaa N aalJa•a•I ± NNNN±+±NNNNNN:+N ±: NNNNN NN illaaaaa111aaa ailaii •a •iaila ails U l 1 0 0 • m mm m m t u N Y N V~ti D . N 0 SV \ 1" Y JN \ W°J\ • JO U SSOS Sn SSA SF VS • N A ZYWN UT t> \ YYOY UA YYN Ou f P f POa YSZ ~P a / CW P N m\ N h WO N WWOW Wh WW1 u V~ O N i II Y •IJY Nw\ V NN PO A °1 : OOWO=pY OOTP OW N N0 < O p JV S iw A `V 1 1 • \ b f qW \P OZ :NP V 1 1 r mViul~Y v aa ..pp ~~pp V NZ M1OMO i •Mr~hMMi•tllrr\ J tl: F•Yiw m Z. J I1J06.< L m° m J N, M1°O w f• fU \P _ D OOWOiOF;00 O i C OV nS0 J V ¢ \ ONAZ ~Ni YN VOJ w W N NWNM1 < • w 6 W M7 • ,+ i Of0 M1 _ J Z_<TW W O i . 9 ~ VG=:FNJ.WW WIWh WWV\iWUWJ M i SM1Z NSOJiiMi ZFOii<NWm2iL m V ~• •Z• uh ZOSM Y000 nn\IYVY 1 < . = M<lt y~~ i fS o U I NT 1 2u^J •M• OYS\<W p W. • V YI ' 0 l i O b > ° O 0 IN>Z w~ u u WZSVOU •SWO•Lh bU„ i mhai .Sl p°a iNeDMDDY~rFZS.oM NcDnil-.W hnl Mw J ~ i mi '° C y »``m i3< 1l Y D 1wYmW>CY: WWU6 YLLO YY n M > •1O LL ° N Y .ujy ppy u LL ~ f 6W=O w w YWW tt W SWwwOwwwu UDOW M J 1L VSVVn hZ06O O LL06i F iu020 iN IOw .t ZOW60 W w ° ZfN W W WLL O Ym ZJVO 2WS02fWW WW<V W wY V SW2 m 9 2 O ° • 2 iyYY •NJO FeFYYr w wwzwMW w W Y WAY<WijN>ww i.iY fug °+mNWW..r rYYOiWWiIxYJrmWUYrT u u NNWOF 6Z UJUWr•hZhWO J7fOU UNh~ YWWSWN u •W• h L<FSr•{i N° m h O Y_ ~SOJ22M0 WUSOS Z YNlYiN2f2Zl u auLLYLLMUOLLZOLL20ZNJM0° wJ<aWODUi°JMU :Cw w I i 0 U MODOwuu«ZUN ° i e a oo n> ii ° i . .~LLNY au NN uo NNpN N JNNWUNN>NLLCOaNY .> o >ovu i oi w o p FNS m> F __ > • r h MM N u l a i a ~ nl iN i s i oW x i co u .. N . • W 111 0 b~Ww o • YN ~ JO< SNW~ i f V Y 0 VY OWNMO UJ J Mf f VVYN f 11 M = Y„W :0 V SVZ<W< U YO JJZNr ~ 0<h V S<V Zi Y if ONMNYFZ JZ YSOSh\JO ii >VOYI uh> JO 3N ZfN Z W II Y JO t••N•F YwNmui 0JV9wYZF3h Y W O SYp Y OF~ SWFN NU MWYJUVW<OJSYSDDf Wap{DOY 00 .•li i0>Zf ° = •I Z>M Jw~ ~ ~ W ~rV f Y ~ ND ~ • W F\rW WYOf W JW i JM=OO e W 6i< FZ Y OO N ~iUFf N Nf < O ~ M O OFIF p C 1 Np NWW.tWN •i DO 1. OOOFF YI•'.~euiN2JVWYiJS F Y <D F1 ffWVV 11 II • Z W M\IU• >SNhi 2Z >pl h Ot S • Z FFf N ~i O. N • •iOSJJZMYO Fw • F •LL • U >M~NWFS! ~j ~• yy ~j y YWWVM« 2000<IyJYViWhJJiWSi~tOJYNYfYiLiYi\ ~i li OF J>t<Y YUJAphFVNNMbNMZY YNFJJiON«YOJJJM FnI2iCY0Y • ` E mY •ZI 1 J O<N VI•N<i « <\fl«fff0000000000000 00 VUVUVVVUVVV :Y• OIhaANNN ~OFNa.POAtlNO01.IhmtlOhh.OmPN n~phNAT..1100= e: •0 n OyAAPNAO 0 O A N NNNMOONON.OaNOn~NNONON pN MPFAOnPNONaAP N~ I~NOOTM NT~T 0 ON P NNP .211 n Fl T A . .1 NA•• N ~1 i11 • i M . mm W• Y>: 5 YVtl P>NOVNNNVNNOrHµPOOVVO .YV~OMNINNN•NnNPOYOV NON NPIPPVNPWYhOfVNOWr.~rrNOPrONPNWONWVWWWNYVVMNNONVOOM LNNwMMj:S323ZyPgOOggqqT}}}}T}TT}TAAAAAOOOOOpO000PPP Oii• COO> OOpf m)> GOOpOFNMAA>Lq>)>Cw••OAmAA> CCC 1NfOw: OL31NPPAOmfpZAAVVLZi AYAOPLwgNNNNINYHN3f wPif l'1 )C• AV}ti AT ON m(•[1 Cryy~ NATAZ21••yN>A ryANVr f> H:iN100y3 3mA'III: L)A'NmTT»•y1Vir Pi13~yyNPOAp>yiyAi OAy• 1 A)>V Illr> = AZZ AN yTp yi AO PON3TC3F„„ i f• »:mf•>I' V w02= IymNN • RAPZ Cfw• qA <f • Algm f} 3f1 •IA •p _ m~• ~_ j• HY_ )i• _O _ }A_1'1_p01_> Ofi}33}>Ai AN ••^ • # G'"a± i PNMO N__N N_O yI' >: ~~1 Of1Af mwj AAi1 CIAmA N^][r NI~YYrNF}Z>PT i1Yti wj>AZw<f• P> gNZN NaON pN0 PZYi>yP(IPANL> Imf Vmn O aY N 9yfP V OZN 2^ AI>AOgyi qpl NN VP i } AmfO 2C> fA3 T>ZN 3M1 jsy AN i pA Oy OZP < yC~M p0_1 Y _N f I' OC • a~P Nf OI"1 YIq q A r0 3 O y N 1 N <ryO 3A MZ•10 C} i oiv m••ma ie o~ ~ • N 10 C• _ NZ> if1 1 Y Z +V • <N qH f (+ ) N S T i AP f • O }('I>}PGNANpTPNVN(10I.ONN>f Nq<A>}L>NOMPAOONbCiN i=NPNAP p000ZiAACC1~•OmwtiiaMCf•OgNe•NTa•fi e'•~n f•N 1INOAT}rypi> ~ Yf•AV STOIIM NN\V•1i APONAVNOf•NNO<21Q A}ry0}Ai 1}}OCI•<i Af NN ONO i1i1 }NAOf yy< ij= >AAyNiNM NLVbMM\CMNAiTAIOANN~AiI YA:ZfIOOArN M_bNVA NIAA CmNP>CyZ APNCAryryAOpi3i13ryAmPO Ti>!A: -PNT!>NN<i\NA POS(~ORNA>ViAAi b_ 00 AAiCV AN fAiry• PPm~T<j(ZiTATRAI•AA<V1'\OIIINMiONNNr PRRARIAANO iVYf tisoll'INmNVTN}•ArY}}PS}ts}L »V\CO cC}NNivVbAV aA N OOTCZOi I•N WA ZAfAAO>AV>O.NVVAy1yi oMoM\}A\f ^Ni~TNA11i•w10 AqN<(~f NiT~yAS~Af V1PAA0^N%iAVNO~AINAV~NA>)iNiipZVAO •30>UC•OV!•A Nl Oln>VVO'SN tiNVi}P>VCViVNWNiP bi MNf > b•114}NAi} i}AN NIAP )10 A1L A ANA 1 ~N NNA Nc\tOAANi OY iNRORN i> M ON\> Nq~•ii OA//11 OON }Iyl _O 1'P i P> M• ONCOA>O rNl- fA >MOO AA1~> >C N}y i iZCf Hi>Y<>11 Oi ni MOIOi• fi i IlA ON R NON Z NiANP A AA AN- -V~O)b} :N • TDNTA . R,~NNTq A• m POm O N= q A AM • O N N bTfA ~3 VINH ~ n9 • uO~m fM T Y ><1 C NiYR P _ 3_Na YYA\O y M NiN tar 1N 01~N TN }V Y P TN M<VMp \ W P p\Ai ff1R R01. }M O i •MMON N V• Ob O NbP WN ONN Pi N e OA CC iR N fl^ OtA ON M 1 O_ i O N} O< AV< Y O •• •A _\ Y iA ON MM -AV > > • A 3A i • R T •N qVN P>1 > N A A A VO ti A O 3 ZCV Zf1P (~ I i A 00 S 2 N } AN Y A O N• A_ N T N < NHNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNMNNNNMM~NNNNNMNNNNN< •....e....>.Y...l....>we...Pp....P...>.P>aNPPP>.Pam YVVVVVVN<NNOON<N>VVVVVVVVVVPPIPPpPPPPNNNYMYMNNVPPPPb PNPYNNOVPVpN>VNVOVOVPMPWNMOtlbVpN.WNNOVOVOMpYNVOV<VP) N O YWNMPOINJOWMOPYN NMYN~Y NVp•O OOapINWPOYbb ONNMOONNNWW• .VNNVNNPyNO~aO sAaYM~Ct•494MNIIRONPYAP~INPaNYNaNOAO •••••WPOOIOVOOOOVONOVOONMONNNOONfPOOPOVO VOVNOPOOV •a•OONONOMOMYONOOOOMNOOpOOtlMONPNOOPI<M<POPNSVONY0000< <: _: A• ~~ i/ A• }~ V• O• i• q } i ~ Aw lDl Ay 00> p}i a ry ODD \an •2n aNi O 6 E :; a 9 s ; O Nn000000000hNPOTOJpNO00TNOOTOTTONOMTJO OY+ OJOOO0000TOPOTNNPNNOON<OONNpOJhoPThOnJ0000r ~f~ rJNNOp<OmNNNPp1pTVMpOpOPg4NNNMFOTOTTTOm000NTT \11 rTOTnOrONnOJN <JO ghONhCOTPhOJTNNNNNmOJy .r .n .. r Nr T TNP w J \M m T NnN n rN OrT r 2/ /D/ JMpPOrNTVNOppPOrNTJ N.ph OpOrNwIJNOhpPOrNTJNmNp ~ /Sl COOr TTTTTTTJ JJ• 00 rrw.1rr-~IMNMNNNNNMNNMNMNNNNNNNNNNnNNNVV Nw NNNNNNN NNNNNhNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN:NNN+NN : OJJVJJJVJJJJJJJ JJJJVJJVVJVVIJVJIVJJJIJJJJJIJ •JV •J q ! J • • q f \ Z P Vb O O O <W N Y OZ •Z • 4 hiNN O i w 1 Z NN4H h h Z pq N R o U / O O< rN U h W ! OI •W Ji<W! o ~ h ¢ •M J i i¢ ¢O ! iNa u ~ _ 1/ R F OWIi V Y l J~ JV Ord N• VpNOh O O i~l Jw<Nw J 1 U>N U¢+ 11 Nr IN i WWWWF W {pJOZSMp J P • ~DWWWiWW2WNWFWW O\O i ZN VUI OLLO•N W _L O_ _h_WO p W _ ___ _UJO_U _>N\V_r N JVIWwwL MIN «~•W T ZUM Rh <ZVS qU\>Z¢Z~~SpMS UIL2u w O <00 WN6 •S Nl ONWZJWWWW¢WINWhSNWO NZ VW II OWWWW D C hPLL.Z U ¢Z¢OTUV wONNhFFhhhRNY2f OW w„NOJOOOf W ~Nr Z ¢IOLU„¢~J~WSnSN LLVUU ZVgLL pJ wVWO EFNW6N¢N \O ZWWNW NN ZZWp 2 )OVO JlZrUOIifLYCVfYFUYU 7 JUw22GiOiii <iOS ZS mi~J6N JZJ hW W _ U LL~N O NO JJJ ~ZO U >Z Wi LLS S LL OW WUWVFW 2N hw h W W W OVm¢> W 1 <WJW>oJJphN\\\ WhV U>~ WVOIhW WVJNJ J<NJiiwJW W N U hW\NN¢m 00<CZJ rVWhLL VOVNVF ZUf ¢JphihiV f~ •ZO hi2hFhrWRph S2lWN)YZFhZW VUwrm¢N¢FZFrtY WIR MZ NZSJN LLLLLLLL ¢hti NOWONFZNSOSYFZwNNSr OWWfw >SIMWlWNWWpw¢NOWf UN6Z<wi)LLmONHNNipZVN2¢¢OZipZOJJhpOOCiU>G>JYir>LOp>Z J F } / V i W2 h ! U w U Z b ( U V pf w 2 V II _ __ r tl Z N J ¢ h JJN GJ Y6 R V S fff Ofl V 1>NNJ ND Of NWOMZV JIJVN Z2 N hJ¢ hV <1[ZY » qi UYN } MSZ Wif Fii V\J• Zi Z OSgNV\JJ •ZW LLJfOOfOV •fif i¢fJ J W F fVNNW LLV Z2w• w}.i ~ WhiNOZJNUS O / •UW v0< OL< 6MJ WWZOJ\LL ZV'JNMN •wi ZOW2N¢~i •1~h00>N»ZN• ~¢MJ VNM JVFISOMNfO OOrtWJJ S NV!! JUSWONCOOW 29F ~\9'J OhNiJW •YNN Y / 11 / JJVGWW<q• n.• OSIJNS 2 VoV NYOi >DOM9WOVZRfFV LL\<NVNSiJJWW<\SiJMN\ N~1 ~<J h~>iZMr WWh<DU O Z / / NM NGti!<LV[\_MOMhIJNfttihl FOIJRfYWIF4VV%FWY000•t\ V i0y0Z.2 ZSS O~Z YyiV 6 ~ wO i i i \~ /i/ 6¢221<NUVl6 0•F J`f Z WiiMN <ViJNSO 00hw N i O /i/ \UUUUWUN 0000<WWOO~I WWSNNO¢¢! glggf¢w N¢JJJJiiiiiiiZiZtiiZSSiiZ000O0Y4LL6\GLLq•6.Ogi!ll6gq! NNPYOOPNOHPVOpmNNTNNTrrJNNNhpONTrFrPNNPNpTi4pgOPTTpN /O• OJNhONOON..ITNNVJPhTN~irTONNNNONNNJOVNI~gNTwPJJTNJ O} /Z• TTrryn rNNpTJN a hNN rNgprMNONNOrPNNOwTJpNON N M ryinrrN NM rNr ww NN rT NT NJ TON N / Y! ~~~ ~''/// 1 I WWMW WY N wNW N NNN! rNNlfp YPVOyV!!lINNONWUOWN NNyVWNM«!VV!lWWVyrpNNVVwWNWINpOyr N••OO NM gMplWlNgrWNNMW«NbrNlWNPtlONNNNNtlOtlOrptltlPP yiCZZZZCCGyy+lyyyyyyyyNNNNNNNUNNNNNNNNNfnAn rmm>szzcecAA Aoo y«}9ovpoANms)>)• vvN« pnOrrNNnNNnbaAN NIAr i>Srn s•m> rmzzzTnnyPyn °'~irT.i y2Ammlri~mA mlziloon i.~NZ~p~yrni .°•iiii~: oibmil~ wvNi mmPipvNyAn ell>o Ni>rrrrr9 T m an>yNne ziy~n3A N• ~r m~z <N yormrN««>z•~ia v mOmnin O. im2yyTTTTJn 3~N°niiN GSA O_OC• yNr _N\><y irOn O• _ NIpSf~OV Nn2y n fl r:y COO~rfPOOmI vy~ _ Cr y i m TOyym'Ty} mrmN220>NANO AmTy Sm ~•rpAm nnn Sm O__00__On ' ImZq < Nn2 1n OmAA~TOi •p mm~Ny yOn ZO On±nN> n fA 1 1M9• y Oy yny prAN 1111 O m0 r AOS Z•.Ny »A yTO hl.i Z AO Nn9y A yV ANAVq • ZS2 c 2 p 2 f 2 m .....• •• Tnp m < n e n ~ A o ~ n c • i v • T s m rrrr • CCGC i i~si A 9<iijnA20<Z «WmTiAT~b~nFp'NVlmTpAir}PrrO=< F~mm}y::rmSP2i Zi 2••nN0 Z}imAmA ZYNNS A2yMAAm mAMmFNPY•OTANj>i rWMWWMC}injmWPmA<w 291N «f')}n)nn)nl inVfV'OOOOij Cllli YS m>n m>rOrr r}MNrmN• )Omi ArOOn11r pyNy <S mn4l mlzm ml~iT ^mmm •• :mNNAjO9m OArWOYA}A1 ZT A A f~ 9=V zmTi : N= 6> jnimWYONNO Z<OmNNA~Mj OOOT j• ~n O. OSn yi \ANmi< i> OVT~12TiVi ifNi 11f 1=mP'~NMO~IOyMtfjV~NNy At •'• bj))ibOy yYYY ZYNOnrOMPMnAmNy Or n V O r}Nn mrGTm m111V mOSnNCO< PNPONi A• OCtl O m 1 s ssl zTZmz} zzn :Aei s s mm 1 VNO) >)O) 1 N} O'^O O O_ _••O _ NrNTnVmC ` O OMNir\O N Y} } A mq nNT SNn f1n n \nnMMA .nfT NnrA m m • n>rr9m• a eli:mM}>TTl•, }>_<m I m 111 _ n mm)Sr yrn NIy 0000> iA 1 rb pnYM • Z W< On<mT A rnOAA n Vin \} 20ii A m A n+ZOyS = ; MOO W` MONVSiVT O M OV}NOO IP11 N y0* M T P A Y WPj9 ~ Z V \ N N ) 2 M ~ N N r P O e C4 L O bl.l ; ~ O w n YA O Q1NM m N N n N tl N<N W) 2 i WO b• bbbbA W bP O>Im'1 !l!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!wN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!e NNNNNNNNNNNMNNNNNMNNNNNNNMNNNNNNNNNNNNMNi NMNNMMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNMNNNNNMm VVVMyVVVVPPPPPPPPPPNNNNNNNMNN!!A OtlOyOU•WNVOOOyPNOWNMOObVPNPWNMO<bVPMIWNrOtlOr f P MY P P N NNN b WMNYVnYW W NpYY• WPOW•INYyNMVPONNPNNVWOWV NVP ••'O . S NyS<00901T¢NPMWpVOiiW¢P in•N ¢ygi¢FWMLgONi'A¢ • OONVONONOOOOONOPOOpMOPP00lNNNPOOOOOOOVOIOMN •i~ isi ~m~ X YY ~i~ 10 1m ,A' Y 1}• ioi •i• Y n AMO NT ooi OT^ >O in • j !01 ON3 O COPY._..~~...~. r.w.nb.a.nl.ulr......_bn9eR.ar9 R99ef9gfON fele diCOI1d1C ee91RMe uaNwn 1. 1.9ry51 a 4CW)ry51 rRE tq. fa DlplarlN N Aln]elk enwga Cwnrd 190 aFCEMn H0. MS)l 5wow,Cdl.9119 RI.ORIOt ,www...w.:....w....: !b eAii GYRReL eATf19i corx xn An NMardpbdlwM9 appSn b Rnwn MniOadahJo.e Da. hlNd _ _- T. NAMf(SI q A9f1K:lYf,~.,i iawp 9w.i1 ApptaA Nlldw Sao ]IWI ^ Flbadw Dula o Ma[Yn Oab: Y[uldaet-MW{AYO. 9.~1e R. ]. TY9Pr51 q le.W)ACTOW51 ~ ~ itPE s I. Nau d 9ad,w S. t slbn d f,nilw-~NwMw ad Snwl eax xrs )v. alr and °" cad. cawot notm tutu s a n rnna.n Ilan..e, i. An rv.n.1N1 hnida ]Ira. iyp d Uwna t7-2))1N City limiet lei e. Mtihq AdMarl M 61M.n1 ha. sl-N.A./ wd snwr n..b mr.r O.FNOn ywr./ar banrr [an.iwd M a HLwryf 10, Nwa Voa am abbbd ^a1 M do p/mWae N do eaearepa [aorM b w rp+bda. N do Da9wINba1 9!1' / IvinY.Mrolhe AA! 11. f.plNn o "tF)" amww b IlNrrn 9 w 10 on m anwbnwn .Awh ThaN b dwwad pan d MI appemeen. .. M. M199yRw'1 apwl I.1 Nel wry mwwPl b an•Na ~ .nrd g111:MN MII hen op Mw VadNkanam A a kwew,, wld L. ...Nr «.:r...:_ ......... I...urN.N r.... N i. a.:..:.Nw. N Hw ARdreOe A..raw Canal An.' • i 1]. atATf q cunamu caanry ~N _mort~i~Rw_-°°"-_alsR--.-- ur .w.n. n ..w/..n w:». M... w ~.. , w.«...,e...e ./., n~iw N n. +w+:+. « «. a . +Nr+r. « w ...:I.. ..s w a....rN~ .:~..: ». ..M ..w,.::......:N.::... , w~..n-:- .. N. N...: r I a.: N... ~ n. r'1: w» »n:N«:.: M wN:n Rw.J wJ 4 M N .N .1 M :wnn MnF «. nl :Y: n w:.n w4r M. .MI/ . wiw:w In. w/ f..n «:Kr«r :wnr M :Y glliwr r . ryl...:/ Nni.. :. M .«MnM »4r M Rwl.l 1. _Yd :Y. wlYwln Y ~\: ly M A \www wMNNw n .wnM wnN. .":NF ::.. w I.IM .n w:.wrF .wnN :+. wr. O.: ww/ I^I nv:..\ 4. 4/ «: MIJ :N. w•:.M TNS:i+ h ..Y~ R. y«:n.e ~ M1 IF « n«Nnd . «.I«... w «Nryr»;~ M wr.F+. F `m",.:. > :a.. »/ ~.r., ..../«.: I: +w a ..-i....e~.N+. -./ .. _:.e.-: b .:.« .. wN.,r « :r » ""'1 i~ k' .. wF.. '/~ 11~ AIRICAM ~~fa<~+fiJ l ~~ • ~ ~ + SIGN BEAf _ __________~_____-__.....___._.._____._.__._I .._. .. v .. __--___________yf~__________ __________._.+ .__.__.__._______..._.......____.._____.__-_ _ ... 9 !~! ArylItA710H RT iRANfF[ROR .~,~a~: IS. sieif q CAR(OIIMA ~...:-p+(~ -: Cpualf d-.l3W:tIDF_.______....~.Delj->t/)/N._. wN ^N/ M /wM/.."A: N.wr .Nn. /IwMe/ nNr.r Ib.. \wMn ~y III M N M pr:T.. w ^wn'1 NV'! .1 ~ . ~a F Y I.:.pY M.I.r .nMnn. YI w..I.N w w4 .N w.iw .wY:N^ w N W1/: nl M 4 4.1/ i./N. w an...: N w ...sa Nw:wn k,a:.a N+.. r n .-+...... a+ ...a.wr wa.•. Rwn.. Fiats « a. 1wr NMIf N M 1«.. N wJ w.Iw N wwwn F Y 0.:M: nl nw Y .wnM wMN.lw ..w..N ,..In :.:w .~.:. /NI/ M In.wl 11 ti n~ «.n./ .ti .n eN":/ 4n .e.1 F ~w "NN! M x.nM TMN.Nw N YM -M M aw.r..w . M1 wM w aMlw M w.n.:w . IW.../ . uF" ....rv « :rwnn..: r mm«: ~/ i. ".R...+ N wn:sn . M M1wrw M w nM:h Ynl N Y a..r~r. ~. w,~ „T. tlNiRinlpp osni, nic. I ../_... __.. ~/ ///...i.... I ~/i»)as 19, lo[aeu NniM/ and SYaal City and 7V Cob Coo^IS D. Nol FNW MlNer 7AY i.b.i Fa OaMNa1NIN Uw ONe AMfMdI eaoRdad eelln, Q ~ ~~ ~F___~._________..__.1____.._.._ cones IMIt[D ____~L~~__.".._._.~__._..._..~_ ~~~. (::: t l~yi.il t_l : Iyp4L U.ylpA47Tt~(1 a ~~,y W' iy ~~~~,~~l U uU' ~~~~ ~IJV i' ~' , Y4 ., t`4 ~iX.LY ~~a :. t. ~ i1 1~ ~:~ ...1- ~~ ' \ ~ ..J "_ IFS nl~iMl ~.. ii ~? owowo-'~ ~' 1 ~~ ~' ~ I~Ia~I .. ~~~~ ..~ . ~oov$ r qa tr'_-~i ~ .. MML IWIf li ~ L ~ ~•~ ~3I ,~;~ ~~~~ RIIIIWaI ~ " i -r' i ~ ' V ~ L5 k' ' ~g ~... a1L w. i t, 3 % `l. IL ' 0~ ..'Zit. ~._.~L ~,!{I ~`'~j!...,.v.. MANGO'S BEACHFROMT CgFE/ 8034 Maven Ave. ' Rancho Cucamonga. Cq 91730 APNI 7077-661-01 Property is currently Zoned: General Comaerctal Zoning of adJacent property: North: Flood Control/General Cowaercial/General IDnUatld l%Gp eUhaRi i1Z South: (ndustlal Specific P1anlFoothill Specific Plan/Naven Ave. Overlay District East : Terra V1su P1enMd Caai~unlty/Lpamunity Camaelcial Nest: hood Control/ISP sub-area /11 Mary Burgan March 40, 1998 ~y ` _~ ~, w Il z1r ( uJ1 LY.N. .. ~..•..ml{l aa~o. lr \/~ 14 m.arRta. ~?w fi'~ .'..re^, M. I~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 21, 1990 ~~ T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, Ctty Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Junior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting bras" for the Highland Avenue Reconstruction, Hermosa Avenue to Mayberry Avenue improvement Pro,~ect, to be funded from TDA Article 8, Account No. 12-4637-8910 RECONENDATIOM: It is recommended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the Highland Avenue Reconstruction, Hermosa Avenue to Mayberry Avenue Improvement Pro,~ect and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUNDIANALYS[S The sub3ect project plans and specifications have been completed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for COOStrllCti on is S2B6,/k/. W. Legal dUVerLlsing i5 Sci,CUUieu iu, pi", iii 27, 1990, and April 3, 1990, ivfth the bid opening at 2:00 P.M. April 19, 1990. Respec submitted, r ~ . ~:?•~ -. Attachment RESOLUTION N0. ~~ - ~ ~ J A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "HIGHLAND RVENUE RECONSTRUCTION, H'c"ni{OSA AYERUE TO 11•.Y BERRY AVENUE". IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ROVERIISE TG RECEIVE BIOS. NHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct cc-t~+n +mnrnvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga he and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Highland Avenue Reconstruction, Hermosa Avenue to Mayberry Avenue". 8E IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the bounce or the i,i Ly vi na neuv Cv~diiivuy~, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 19 day of April 1990, seated bids or preposals for the "Highland Avenue Reconstruction, Hermosa Avenue to Mayberry Avenue" in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Bids must be made on a form provided for the Durpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "BTd for Construction of Highland Avenue Reconstruction, Hermosa Avenue to Mayberry Avenue". PREVAILING NAGE: NOt1Ce is hereby given Ehai li, aacrdar,ca with t"~ provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general Drevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locaU ty to which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Departwent of Industrial Relations of Lhe State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of Der diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file to the afftce of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, ~~ Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to arty interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the ,lob site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, 1f such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, Dy him or Dy any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and Tn accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions 7n Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Cade concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprentlceable occupation to apply to the ,joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate o' approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to ,journeymen that wilt be used 1n the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to ,journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. Nhen unemployment in the area of coverage by the ,joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. Nhen the number of apprentices in training fn the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. Nhen the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. Nhen the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not Less than one apprentice to eight ,journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds esta611shed For the administration of apprenticeship programs 1f he employs registered apprentices or ,journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. 12 The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Oivi si on of Apprenti cesm p Standards and its Drancn offices. Eight (B) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the zxecution of this contract and thz Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the ~.~ta ,.f ral:fnrniA ha v;na to do with Working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (f25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned; for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to tabor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent iivbi or ine amount or said old as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond tc be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for ilia performance of tire work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Raneho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. I~ Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 1000 et. seq.l and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time time this Contract is awarded. Tho work is to be done in accordaru:e with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans znd specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of f35.00, said f35.00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request 1s accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of f20.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at Lhe Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities 1n lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right t0 re,~ect any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 21 day of March, 1999. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 21 day of March, 1990. ATTEST: city Gera ADVERTISE ON MARCH 27, 1990 APRIL 3, 1990 ~5 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 21, 1990 T0: City Council oi,"rv City „"-i agcr FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Junior C1vi1 Engineer SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Base Line Road Median Retrofit from Haven Avenue to Deer Creek, to be funded from Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 Account 43-4130-8956 RECOMMEMBATIOM: it is recowaended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the Base Line Road Median Retrofit from Haven Avenue to Deer Creek and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice inviting Bids". BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subJect pro,{ect plans and specifications have been completed by J.F. n.p+n.,.,, ",.n oue rnrornnrafnA naW ovaA by ctaff and aooroved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction of Alternate A is 5155,500.00 and Alternate B is 553,000.00. Legal advertising is scheduled for March 27, 1990 and April 3, 1990, with the bid opening at 2:00 F.M. on May 3, 1990. Respect u ~bmitted, ~ ,w~ R :sum Attachment RESOLUTION N0. 9p - ~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAiIONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "BASE LINE RETROFIT. FROM HAVEN AVENUE TO DEER CREEK", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIOS. 1iHEREAS, it is tt~e intention Gf the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, NHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOM, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Base Line Retrofit, from Haven Avenue to Deer Creek". 8E IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit; "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Jan tlerndralno LoWty, Lall corm a, al reCLl ng Lm s notice, NUllbt t) wtRteT GIVEN that the said Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour pf 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 3 day of May 1990, sealed bids or proposals for the "Base Line Retrofit, from Haven Avenue to Deer Creek" Tn said City. Bids wilt De opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Ltne Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California. 81 ds must be made an a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of Base Line Retrofit, from Haven Avenue to Deer Creek". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provfsions of California Labar Cade, Division 2, Part 1, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not iess than the generai prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work 1s perfonlled, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work, In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has detenained such general prevailing rates of per diem wages, Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any Interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the Job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic empioyzG fdi each calendar day - po-•i^ thereof if ~!~ch laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. - ^^-n_,.~a ..+rn tho nrnvisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended~by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance wish ii,c regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured aDPrenti cos may be employed in the prosecution of the work, Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1771.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor ar any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to appiy to the Joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works protect and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to Journeymen that will be used in the perfornwnce of the contract, the ratio of apprentices to Journeymen in such cases shad not be less than one to flue except: A. Mhen unemployment in the area of coverage by the Joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent 1n the 9U days prior to the request for certificate, or B. Mhen the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. Mhen the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. Mhen the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight Journeymen. The ContracWr is required to make contrl4utioas to funds established for the admtnistration of apprenticesM p programs if he employs registered apprentices or ,lourneymen 1n any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractdr under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 1n the employment of apprentices. I$ Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the state of California as amended. The Contractor shall Parfait, as a penalty to the City cf Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (f25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic .,.i,.ye,~ in rho ^xecu.+on ~f rhg rnnr.arr ny him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic 1s required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, pAyable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (IOY) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter Tnto the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond snail become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. it the pity or nancno wcamonga awards the contract to kite nevi lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, Tf any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performwnce of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (1000 of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty Percent (508) of the contract price for said work shall be given Lo secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performiarx:e of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor w/11 also be required to furnish a certificate that he tattles compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal fora has not been Issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules I and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time tine this contract is awarded. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, avallabie at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of f35.00, said (35.00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request 1s accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an addi±tonal nonreimbursable payment of f20.0D to cover the cost of marling charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor many, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to re,{ect any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 21 day of March, 1990. PASSED AND ADOPTED by 4he Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, __~ .~~ VPIII VI II , Ili ~~ uu~ v~ ~W, or ATTEST: er AD:ERT1 °.,E Ok MARCN P"I• ,oon APRIL 3, 1990 d Q CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 21, 1990 ~~"`O'k: (1%~ 9 y/ _~~[ ~,I ~ iA I-. i_Z 19' TO: Mayor, Members of City Council and City Mpp alnager FROM; Joe Schultz, Community 9en•ices Man ger .(~t BY: Karen McGuire-Emery, Associate Park Planner SUBJECT: NAMING OF PARK SITE ADJACENT TO FUTURE Y.M.C.A. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approve Miiliken Park as the name of the park site situated adjacent to the future Y.M.C.A. facility in the Terra Vista Planned community. BACKGROUND: Plans Por the park located adjacent to the future Y.M.c.A. site in the Terra Vista Community are currently being reviewed by City Staff. Before the plans are finalized, staff suggests that it ie appropriate to establish a name for this facility which will be located on Milliken Avenue, north of Church Street. Tho A:c•nrl.. n~nno.-..of a.... n....,..1 .-..i..., w... ..r.r., l.. ~...a ,t.. ~. of names of significant persons and families that have played a major role in the history of Rancho Cucamonga. The Milliken name dates back to the early 1800's when Daniel Brewer Milliken and George D. Haven purchased a large tract of land in Cucamonga and planted several hundred acres of grapes without benefit of water. The Milliken Ranch, located on the corner of Arrow Highway and Haven Avenue, Was one of the first 'dry ranches" in the Cucamonga area supporting the raisin industry. Because of the location of the park facility on Milliken Avenue and the historical importance of this name in the history of Rancho Cucamonga, the Park and Recreation Commission recommends to City Council the name Milliken Park fcr tFic Lark site adiaueut co the future Y".M.C._w. f_ar_.iii_ty i__n_ the Terra Vista Planned Community. Respectfully submitted, A~f,7~(/ Jo Schultz l/ Community Services Manager JS/KME/kls CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 21, 1990 T0: C9ty Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire. City Engineer BY: Bob Porter, Assistant Civil Engineer e~3 . SUBJECT: Approval of an adjus4aent to Cne Tri-Caaaunity boundary line used for community identification on City street name signs. Adjusting the westerly boundary of the Etlwanda and the easterly boundaries of the Alta Loma and Cucamonga areas from along Rochester Avenue between Base Line Road and 4th Street to be along Day Creek Channel and Canyon from the northern City Sphere limit to Interstate 15 then contirtutng along Interstate 15 to 4th Street It Ts recommended to approve an adjustment to the Tri-Cau~nunit<y boundary as 1t applies to logos on City street none signs. The new boundary will be along Day Creek Channel and Canyon from the northern City Sphere 19ntt to Interstate IS then continuing along Interstate 15 to 4th Street. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS vi ~~ $i yii Sto~iJ6i J> ~uii iiri ti¢ yi dec+iciit v i`q icdi u~ tic ._--iq name on street none signs. The current boundary between Alta Lana and Etlwanda is Day Creek Channel and Canyon frgm northerly City Sphere limit to Base Line Road, westerly along Base Line Road to the center of Rochester Avenue and the current boundary between Cucamonga and Etlwanda is the center of Rochester Avenuz, from Base Line Road to 4th Street. The proposed boundary adjusanent is frog the center of Rochester Avenue from Base Line Road to 4th Street to the center of Day Creek Channel and the center of I-15, which 1s 400 to 1,000 feet east. The new location will align with the existing boundary line north of Base Line Road. The change will reduce confusion by using Wore natural d1 v1 d1 n9 lines. Res 11 ltted, RH :BP: Attgch~-ct CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONCA ~cn,Np + 14 g w~',EIt ,- -,- ~:w L0..... 4;p9{t/ _~ ~~Yt .. '. ' I :~'c'•t:7>>'r `I,, tr,\IF\F; ~4 1 ac N~ ~. .^^x a I ~.j` 9 I ~1 I~ ~ . ,~A ""• n ~ • ~ .. + . Y~ + ~ '°M ' d. 1 C a ~ + ;I _ a '9?C:~ IIt.?~IIIiI `gip '7T ~ ~LL - ;fir, ~ _ t / ~~' ~ r ~ 30 ' - :.'~ -rFaA ISM'=~' _ ~t"' U'~ ' xr : :A I i:1 ]il tl ,; I.. Imo-, ~":: 'i ~ y~ yy 5S;;~~,,{T' ~'Y` ).L+ <? p....iirir74k EXI517~1/ . p . ~.::~,r~ „ ~ I ` .!~^.7;+~i4:,R'~/~e°~~+ I 1 I M1 r. ~ , ~ _ 21P CODE : a ~y, j~t t` w .r2~ I ~ ,j2~'~~I £ 2 : ,~ x ~ ~ (-~. ~~ ~ ~3 w,. r'Yf~'~! VICTONA t .~. - - •~- ~I. ~r ;e :~ ~ 1 r.: i I„ ~T ~ ' ~" ~ r u as * .~ ~7w `xx I ~• ' ll• :r. I . a ~ r r ~ ) k ' , ~ ~ /t ' '- _- .TERRA VISTA n-66 _ ..I-_ -- .'~. .. "i': t . ` ~, -Y' • d V ~~+'tx%~ t ~ 4 u.~lE '~ '+~~`M `I~ ~ exisrrNO ~ ~ d i t E ~ W P I 1'r I~., I~ , , t '({ ~ 04N ARY ' yyi :.,, ~ ti .,r w ~ `~.` t x.nov loran Y } Jxe ~ w,, ~;91 ~!~ l .'. .. a 2. coot 9S)l0 n ~.eii mu~ixx. ~tle0 uik4 MM IrP _ , x WwM i flU x ! I .i 1' lu t ~ fr4) o s ~ V . unw.4_ LL _i` w {qI F x ~ IS ~I I I e \. ~mii e I I l i .~~I ..x I 4 _ V 1... ~_ I J ~r i1` l f ~, ... .~ ~ ~ - . ~. ~~ . ~ r ., ~ ~ a ~ ~~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 21, 1990 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguice, City Engineer BY: Gary Varney, Maintenance Supervisor Streets & Storm Drains SUBJECT: Approval to Purchase one (1) Insulated Telescopic Aerial Lift mounted on van from West Coast Utility Equipment Company of Fontana, Ca, in the amount of $39,496.31 to be funded from Gas Tax Account 09-4647-7045. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council award the purchase of one (1) Insulated Telescopic Aerial Lift mounted on a van to West Coast Utility Equipment Company of Fontana, CA, es the lowest responsible bidder, for the amount of thirty nine thousand four hundred ninety six dollars and thirty one cents ($39,496.31}. The purchase to be Funded from Gas Tax account 09-4647-7045. At 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, February 13, 1990, bid proposals for the purchase of one (1) Insulated Telescopic Aerial Lift Van with modifications were received and opened in the City Purchasing Office. Of the Eive proposals sent out three were received and only West Coast Utility Equipment Company of Fontana submitted a bid. Great Pacific Equipment, Inc. of Anaheim, Ca and Bebco Aerial Baskets and Utility Equipment of Irvine, Ca were submitted as no bid, they were unable to meet minimum specification requirements. The bid received fcom West Coask Utility Equipment Company of Fontana is in compliance by meeting or exceeding the City specifications on the performance safety and equipment standards expected. Res u ubmitted, RfBd:.GV!Ia CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ^ATF: Alarch 2i, i^9v TO: Moyor, Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director BY: Joan A. Kruse, Administrative AssisTant SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF CITY VEHICLES RECOMMENDATION cuGntoN ~~(J Cy } U;"` uw J9 197 ~I of o ~ ~A Q IiZ It is recommended that the City Council approve the purchase of one (I) Chevrolet Extended Utility Mini-Van, funded from IGS account number 72-0225-7045, and one (I) Ford Super-Duty Cab and Chassis, funded from OI-0647-7045. The units will be used by Emergency Services and Maintenance, respectively. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS ~n iviarch i, i>i~, ar ~:w p.m., me rurcnasmg ~msion or Hamimsiranve Jervlces received and opened bid quotations for various vehicles. After review of the specifications by both Purchasing and Maintenance, The Chevrolet Extended Mini-Van from Rotolo Chevrolet and The Fo.•d Super-Duty Cab and Chassis from Will Nix Ford met specifications with the most fworoble prices. Estimated delivery time is 120 days from receipt of order. We will be happy to answer any questions regarding this. Respectful submitt~ Jim Hart Administrotive Services Director JH/JAK/mem CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 21, 1990 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROid: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AWARD AND EXECUTE THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ThIE CONS~RUC [ON COST ESTIMATES AND MAPPING FOR TH R ICS IMPLEMENTATION PL TO J.F. DAV IDSON ASSOCIATES FOR THE AMOUNT OF 12 980.00 TO BE UNDED FROM CONTR CT SERY ICES ACCOUNT N0. 01-4333-6028 FY 89/90 . APPROVAL TO AWARD AND EXECUTE THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR THE FINANCING PLAN FOR THE TRAILS IMPLEMENTATION PL N TO A AJ N N b SOCIATES FOR THE AMOUNT 18,0 0.00 TO BE FUNDED FROM C NTRACT SERVICES CCOUNT N0. 01-4333-6028 fY 89 90 . I. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Lity Council approve the subject contracts and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the same. Ii. ANALYSIS: In order to complete the Trails Implementation Plan as directed by City Ceunc il, the City issued Requests For pualifications for the preparation of construction estimates and a financing plan for the City's master planned trail system. Staff has received and reviewed Statement of pualificaLions and PruWSals from the following two firms: J.F. Davidson Rssociates of Riverside - Construction Estimates Agajan ian 8 Associates of Costa Mesa - Financing Plan Copies of the proposed contracts are available in the office of the City Clerk. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the contracts as to form and content. /~ R ec fu ubiRi,~ Bra 8 r City anner BB:DC:mlg - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~•~.... March ii, 1990 ": TO: Mayor, Members of City Council, City Manager FROM: Joe Schulte, Commun{ty S?rvices M.=_nager~ BY: Karen McGuire-Emery, Associate Park Planner SUBJECT: GRANT OF EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON FOR WEST BERYL PARR RECOMMENDATION That the City Council approve the attached Easement Document and authorize the Mayor's signature. BACKGROUND T.*.e c-nstruction of West beryl Park, located at 6501 Carnelian Avenue, is scheduled to be completed in August of 1990. This facility will include two lighted soccer fields, basketball hardcrnrrt. nlwv ~ro4 «._,«_ ~.,« _,,..«_____ __,.:... and picnicking amenities. Securit li htin is v V~~y~r standard City Park design. y g g Provided as Znclttded is a Grant of Easement Por Southern California Edison which requires the Mayor's signature to provide electrical service to this facility. Res ctfully submitted, i oe Schultz ommunity Se es Manager JS/RME/kls Attachment: Grant of Easement per W.O. 6430-200/0-x099 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 21, 1990 ('] T0; Ci sy rym~11 and ftty Manager LJ FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer DY: Paul A. Aougeau, Traffic Engineer ~iio-m~r~ ...__y_, ni ~^.E.....r t':.o -'cc~:ci~t wi vi, inC ~14y OT 1.ipi and for the installation of a traffic signal at 19th Street and Sapphire Street. This agreement will insure that the Rancho Cucanwnga share of the cost will regain 258 if Caltrans funding is not obtained. It also requires Upland to provide the regaining 75S under those circugstances. The City's estimated share regains at 535,475 from Transportation Developgent Fund, Account No. 12-4637-8919 RECOMNEIDATYON: It is recaggended that the City Council approve a Cooperative Agreement with the City of Upland far the installation of a traffic signal at 19th Street and Sapphire Street. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This agreement will insure the tigely construction of the traffic signal at this new subdtvisian entrance, as has been the concern of the C1ty Council. It also insures that Rancho Cucagonga's share of the cost remains at the proper 25'Y. Processing by Caltrans on the necessary plans is progressing and no delays are expected to occur because of the loss of State funding. Respectf ly subgitted, ~/ ~ RHM:P Af.tar:ht~n#. ~ RESOLUTION N0. ~~ - ~ 15 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF A CODPERAIIYL NWICCRf11 ;iilp If1E T+11i Uf UYLNNU rUlt ItlL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL ON 19TH STREET (ROUTE 30) AT SAPPHIRE STREET WHEREAS. tM City Cmmcil of tho f,.i ty pf Ran{hn Clxaraenga desires the installation of a traffii signal at Sapphire Street along with the extension of Sapphire Street south of 19th Street for the safety and efficient flow of traffic at the intersection; and WHEREAS, the City of Upland has required this traffic signal as a condition of development of property within tts ,iurisdictlon at the Tntersection; and WHEREAS, the City of Upland has agreed to fund its 75% share of the design and construction of the traffic signal. IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED TNAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGR, approves the cooperative agreement described 1n the title of this resolution and authorizes execution thereof by the Mayor, funding 1s to be provided from the 1988-89 Transportation Development Fund Account No. ]2-4637- 8919 in the amount of 335,475 recognizing that this amount is sub,)ect to final determination and adtustment as provided to the agreement. ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 21, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer OY: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Cooperative Agreement No. 8-654 with Caltrans for the modifications to the I-15/Route 66 Interchange. A refundable deposit of 5100,000 will be required, Lo be funded from RDA Account No. 13-50300. RECONENOJITIOM: It is recommended that Cooperative Agreement No. 8-654 with Caltrans far modifications to the I-15/Route 66 interchange be approved. A refundable deposit of 5100,D00 will be required, to be funded from RDA Account No. 13-50300. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This agreement is a step in the procedure for obtaining the I-15/Route 66 (Foothill Boulevard) interchange improvements which have been approved by the City Council and for which design and right-of-way work is unuerwgy. Tile yl'YJ C44 iD en Lire i) 4iir iunueu, uub bai it ana wiii yr V~IUw review and checking at no cost to the CTty, provided a construction contract is awarded within five years of the date of the agreement. Upon award of a construction contract the above mentioned =100,000 deposit for review and checking will be refunded. Caltrans has been providing review of the work on this proiect and has returned comments on the Proiect Report. Considerable guidance has been given to the City's consultant on engineering and design and such plans are progressing toward completion. Respectful submitted, cc: Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager Attachment RESOLUTION No. ~~- ~l A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO 1.U1.APNNlY1, 1.hL If UM1fl Iry f4RpRUY'.AG VUVf LIV11 I1L AV,LL KI,1 I,V. 8-654 NITN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE I-15/ROUTE 66 INTERCHANGE MODIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING THE SIGNING THEREOF BY THE MAYOR NHEREAS, the cest interests of the City will be served by the improvement of the t-15/Route 66 interchange; and NHEREAS, such inryrovement bas been authorized by the City Council; and NHEREAS, a Cooperative Agreement with the Department of Transportation is necessary for obtaining final approval of plans and specifications for the work on State property. Section 1. It is hereby resolved by the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga~CaT1'fo~nta, that Cooperative agreement No. 8-654 with the California Department of Transportation for modifications to the I-15/Route 66 Interchange is approved. Section 2. It is further resolved that the Mayor is authorized Lo sign sai aer~on behalf of the City Council. 31 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: March 21, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Jr. Civic Engineer SU&IECi: Award and authorization for execution of contract for Nineteenth Street Improvement Protect, located from the west City limits to Carnelian Street, far the amount of 5285,625.00 (;259,659.20 plus lOR contingency), to be funded with Systems Development funds, Account No. 22-4637-8743 RECOI~ENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept all bids submitted, except the one submitted by 0.0, Beaver Engineers whicA shall be rejected as nonresponsive, award and authorize execution of contract for Nineteenth Street Improvement Pro,)ect to the lowest responsive bidder, Gentry Brothers, Inc., for the amount of f259,659.20 and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend 5285,625.00 (5259,659.20 plus IDS; contingency) to be funded from Systems Development funds, Account No. 22-4637-8743. Also, 1t is recommended that City Councii approve Change Order No. 1 deleting Bid Item 5, slurry seal at contract unit cast of 59,117.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on February 8, 1990, for the subject project. Gentry Brothers, Inc., is the apparent lowest responsive bidder with a bid amount of 5259,659.20 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was 5278,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements, except the bid submitted by O.D. Beaver Engineers which was found to be incomplete. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. This pro,)ect 1s in coordination with the developer located on the south side of 19th in the City of Upland who is improving the south side of 19th. Also, a signal is to be installed by the Developer and City of Upland to be funded 25$ by the developer, 504 by Cal trans and 258 by City of Rancho Cucamonga. Cal trans has deleted the requirement to slurry seal 19th Street, therefore, a change order to delete the contract item will be issued. If after execution of CITY CWNCIL STAFF REPORT ANARD NINETEENTH STREET [MP. PROJECT MARCH 21, 1990 PAGE 2 the contract document by the contractor, the contractor fails to execute Ciidtig6 uru'e'r riii. i, it Wiii ie ii7:uwixeiweu' LU vlly l.0anG1) Lhdt Lne contract nat be executed, the award be rescinded and the readvertisTng of the protect be approved. Res submitted, Attachment cc: Purchasing 1 J J s' ~ 4 Z M 0 Z O a E ~~ = m g~ ~F ~ ~_~ ~ ~ ~~: ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ F 3 s 3'~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: March 21, 1990 T0: CTty Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer i BY: Oan Jades, Senior Ct~il Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Reimbursement Agreement for installation of portions of Master Planned Stores Drain racii(LleS i.. connection with development of Tracts No. 12650-2, 12650-3, and 12650-4, located northerly of Hillside Road, between Haven Avenue and Deer Creek Channel; and Tracts No. 13542- 1, 13542-2, 13542-3 and 13542, located southerly of N115on Avenue, westerly of Deer Creek Channel; between Grigsby Development, Inc. and the City of Rancho Cucamonga - ORA-30 RECOMMENOATIOM: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Reimbursement Agreement, and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same on behalf of the City. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As conditions of approval of the subject tracts, Grigsby Development, the developer, was required t0 construct portions of the Master Plan Storm Drain lines "3I" (Hillside Road Storm Drain), "3J" (Nilson Avenue Storm Drain), and "3K" (Banyan Street Storm Drain). The above required storm drain facilities have been completed by the developer, and have been accepud by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The developer has submltud itemized statements t0 the City to be reimbursed for construction costs of said master planned storm drain facilities. The staff has reviewed the statements for the construction costs s~b^itted by the developer, and has deterwlned that (188,793.95 can be crediud towards the tosai direct wiistruction cast of said Nester ' Planned Storm Drain Lines "31", "3J", and "3K". CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT REIMBURSEIENT A61tEENENT MARCN 21, 1990 PAGE 2 The developer has received in the past (599,340.00 in credits towards the construction of the above Waster storm drain lines. This credi*, has been made 6y deferring of the nraim„e fag +•'°••^^•• 't :.~ ti:~ ^f issuance of the buildin + ^°y~ ~.., ~ y g permits for the subject developments. Per the attached Agreement, the CttY x111 authorize the above mentioned f599,340.00 deferred drainage fees as a direct reimbursement Lorards construction of said roster storm drain lines. Tha remainder (189,453.95 viii oe reimbursed to the developer, per the terws specified in the attached Agreement. Respec y s omitted, Rnrrcu~t:si~-~ Attachment ' 3~ u n i i '"'Is i~ ~a ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA srrano~etxa nm~ox 37 rIN~^nT.'vS~. ~ TRACTS ITi30-2~3~•Y i, ~g~(;1 TRRCTS /3342, -f,-z`i IN '~~4 RLIMOLJIISCMLNf Ad![LMiN'1' ~~A F.~PP: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DAME: March 21, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Dan James, Senior Ctv11 Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Reimbursement Agreement for Undergrounding of Overhead Utilities for Tract No. 13342, located north of 19th Street, between Hermosa Avenue and Mayberry Avenue, submitted by Pannon Design/Development, Inc. - UR-006 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Reimbursement Agreement for undergrounding of a portion of the overhead utility lines on 19th Street and authorize the Mayor and Lhe City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause same to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As a condition of approval of Tract No. 13342, Pannon Design/Development, Inc., the developer, was required to underground the overhead utility iinac nn i4< man iarf e1 An of lahh C4anaf snA Nnanuwa Wanun GtA conditions of approval provided for reimbursement of one-half of the undergrounding of the overhead utility costs from the future developments as they occur on 19th Street. Reimbursement of one-half of the undergrounding of the overhead utility costs from the properties on the opposite side of the street on Hermosa Avenue was determined not feasible, since the properties were previously developed as residential developments. Pursuant to Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, and the conditions of approval of said development, the developer has requested to enter into a Relm~bursement Agreement with the City to be reimbursed for a portion of the undergrounding costs from the adJacent properties directly benefltting from the undergrounding of utiiitles on 19th Street. the oroaerti es outside tha i4mf to of fha subixt devei opmant; Airxtiy benefltting from the sub,~ect utility undergrounding on 19th Street, are Assessor's Parcels No. 1076-101-02, 1076-101-03, 1076-111-09, and 1076-121-01. , CITY CWNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 13342 - PANNON DESt6N/DEVELOPMENT, INC. MARCH 21, 1990 PAGE 2 Assessor's Parcels No. 1076-101-02 and 1076-101-03, located on the north sane of lorti ctree*., easterly of Castlegate Place, are currently developed as single residential developments, and are categorically exempt from utility undergrounding reimbursements. Assessor's Parcels No. 1076-111-09 and 1076-121-01, located on the south side of 19th Street, are currently developed as single residential haves in Low Residential Developaknt District. However, both parcels consist of more than one acre of land, and can potentially develop to up to 4 dwelling units/acre under the Low Residential District guidelines. Therefore, contributions toward Lhe subject undergrounding may become possible at the time of City's conditioning of future subdivision or redevelopment of said parcels. The Engineering Staff has reviewed the total costs of the undergrounding and the distribution of the costs as illustrated in "Exhibit D" of the attached ReleburseaRnt Agreeaent. The Ctty has provided 10 days notice Dr1or to the date of the Council's meeting to those parcels affecte4 by this agreement. Resper ly submitted, // ,~~~ / ~~ ~~,,.% ~'~a'"r Attachments 39 RESOLUTION N0. 9~- ~ ~ 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, APPROYIN6 REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT ERECUTED ON MARCH 21, 1990 Fat UNOER6ROUNOING OF A PORTiuW OF OVERHEAD UTILITIES LOCATED NORTH OF 19TH STREET, BETWEEN HERMOSA AVENUE AND MIIYBERRY AVENUE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, has for its consideration a Reimbursement Agreement submitted by Pennon Design and Oeveldpment, Incorporated, a California Corporation, as developer of Tract No. 13342 for the undergrounding of a portion of the overhead utilities on the north side of 19th Street, between Hermosa Avenue and Mayberry Avenue (UR- 006); and WHEREAS, the developer, at the developer's expense, has completed said undergrounding operation; and NHEREAS, the owners of the adiolning properties rill share in the expense of the undergrounding operation costs as stipulated in said Reimbursement Agreement. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGl1, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Reimbursement Agreement be and the same is hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Reimbursement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest hereto and cause said Agreement to record. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 21, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Ctvil Engineer e~'~3 SUBJECT: Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 1 (CO 84-079) with 3.F. Davidson Associates, Inc., to provide utility depth survey's and legal descriptions for Lemon Avenue Storm Drain. The Change Order is for the total amount of 53,992.00 to bring the contract total to 540,492.00 to be paid from Drainage funds, Account No. 23-4637-8863-4603-4110. RECOMENDATIpI: It is hereby recommended that the City Council approve and execute the above sub3ect Contract Change Order No. 1 with J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS u•~ up.'. p.. pr.°.r~ ..p plans, speclflcati ons and estimates-for the Lemon Avenue Storm Drain Improvements from Amethyst Street east to the Lawer Alta Loma Channei. Numerous utilities are located in Lemon Avenue and Amethyst Street, and potholing has become necessary with pothole survey being provided by J.F. Davidson Associates, inc. In addition, one (1) legal description and plot for right-of-way at the connection to the Lower Alta Loma Channel is needed. Therefore, it is necessary to increase Lhe contract to include pothole survey's and legal description far right-of-way. This Change Order 1s for a total amount of 53,992.00 to bring the contract total to (40,492.00 to be paid from Drainage Funds, Account No. 23-4637-8863-4603-4110. Respec q~ly~submitted, / Y 1 /..n / ~+-/~ /. ~ / HM:,11W:9y "' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 21, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Civil Engineer Suoo ~~T: Approval and execution of Contract Change Order No. 1 (CO 89-011) for a Professional Services Agreement with Ramco Consultants to renegotiate with the property owner (APN X202-191-28) and prepare right of way map for Caltrans on 19th Street Praiect from Archibald to Haven Avenues. Contract to be expanded by E5,000.00 to bring contract total to E24,030.Q0 to be paid from Systems Development Fund Account No. 22-4637-8744. RECOMMENDATION: Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 1 with Ramco Consultants to renegotiate with the property owner of APN X202-191-28 and to prepare a r?ght of way map for Caltrans, in the amount of 55,000.00 to bring the contract total to E24,030.00 to be funded from Systems Development Fund Rccount No. 22-4637-8744. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The firm of Ramco Consultants was engaged to prepare the right of way negotiation-acquisition for 14th Street Pro,{ect from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue. After several reviews and comments Caltrans required that the plan be changed and this change affects APN X202-191-28. Therefore it is necessary that Ramco Consultants again negotiate with the Property owner for their approval. Also, Caltrans requires a composite right of aay map showing ail subdivisions, lots, bearings and distances, etc. of all parcels affected. This 1s in addition to our usual procedure of preparing a legal description for each individual parcel acquired. Respectfull submitted, . ~~~.~ ~ti.,-,<. J M:HM;~! CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 21, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Nillie Valbuena, Assistant Civil Engineer SC~,;EC;. -` .°,: ^d Orderi^ the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 12848, located on the south side of Arrow Route between Utica and Red Oak Avenues, submitted by Barton Development Company RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 12848, and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, and authorizing the City Clerk to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Parcel Map 12848, was approved by the Planning Commission on November 29, 1989, for the division of 6.66 acres into 3 parcels, in the General Industrial District Subarea 8 of the Industrial Specific Plan, located VII 111C iVY 411 JIVC VI n~~Vn I~VVK v~t~m.~~~ v't ~vu yrv ~.4v uun ~~.^. ~:~u• The Improvement Agreement, Faithful Performance and Labor/Material bonds for this protect have been submitted and approved by the City Council on September 6, 1969 with Parcel Map 11852. At that time, the Developer posted the required bonds in advance for the construction of the off-site street improvements on Arrow Route, Utica and Red Oek Avenues. However, the Developer, Barton Development Company, is submitting a security to guarantee the setting of the monuments 1n Lhe following amounts: Monumentation Cash Bond: 52,550.00 The Consent and Nalver to Annexation forn signed by the Developer is on file in the City Cierk's office. RespeC , Submitted, ~.. RHM:N iSja~ - Attachments ~3 RESOLUTION N0. RO -' ((~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC.`.i!01"P.A, CI~IFORNiA, APPROYiN6 PnRCEL 1'fAl' NUNatH lltl4a WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 12848, submitted by Barton Development Company, and consisting of 3 parcels, located on the south side o. lr :•a "aaK ueiween usica and wem uac Avenues, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on November 29, 1989; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 12848 is the final map of the Civision of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements estab115hed as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security submitted and accepted by the City Council on September 6, 1989, under Parcel Map 11852 by Barton Development Company as developer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the C1ty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon behalf of said City; and 2. That said Parcel Map No. 12848 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present save to the County Recorder to be filed for record. T~ RESGLUTION N0. ~Q ~' ! 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAtiuNSA, CAL1hdRN1A, ORDERING THE ANNEJUTION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE fMINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICt NOS. I AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 12848 WHEREAS, the Ctty Council of the Ctty of Rancho Cucaaronga, California, has previously formed a special mat nt:enance disi:nci. yunuaai. w the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred rA as the "Maintenance District"1; and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this tine the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property descMbed on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Cierk their written consent to the propo yed annexation without notice and hearing or NDW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL aF THE CITY ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLYES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative bogy hereby orders the annexation of the proper as shown to Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including "t~lery of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. ~I 5 ex~T •~• ASSESSMENT DIARiRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAMTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 11 ~saflW. I i.i l'lyi :~ ` 'i,,` ''~~ ,r . i M1~` ` C ~~~ yrx.~.p `v~ ~ ~~I SITE iii ~ ~ %YI • i i EU I50N COUP.T ~ ~.~ P- - I~~ ~, I '-i L ~ ,.yak ~ __ L CURT .._.~ ~ M1 _ ...._ ..• r r.: S !_I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ ~~~~~~~ EXHIBIT 'B' PRO,]ECT NAME: PARCEL MAP 12848 N0. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: pcl 1: 2.50 ac N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 13.32 units "c: 2.44 3: 1.72 X66" acres c74FCT i muTrNg wsiNTENANf.F DISTRICT No. of Laeps to be Annexed District No. , 1 --- 5 --- --- --- 6 3 ___ ___ --- --- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Turf Ground Cover Trees District No. Street Nagle Sq. ft• Sq. ft. Ea. 3 Arrow --- --- 20 Utica --- --- 5 Red Oak --- --- 4 JM:3/21 /90 ~~ GATE: T0: FROM: BY: March 21. 1990 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVIONGA STAFF REPORT City Council and City Manager Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer Phillip Verbera, Assistant Givil Engineer cua.irrr, er _1 of ~~p, =;~;. --• .".,r --- ;,,,~,ro.~nt Security. Drainage Acceptance Agreement, ands Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract 13738, located on the southwest corner of Almond Street and Sapphire Street, submitted by Rodine Companies, Inc. RECOMMEM011TIOM It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract 13738, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreements and to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Tract 13738, located on the southwest corner of Almond Street and Sapphire .`4..--a J- •4.- „--.• ~-.. n--JJn-4J-t nln4-J ..• •~-- n~n..n..n.l 1... •Fn I,l ~nnJ nn ~. ~) ..rr~ -J •.- •.~ Commission on Septen~er 14, 1988, far the division of 12.68 acres into IB lots. The Developer, Rodine Companies, Inc., is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Storm Drain Street Faithful Performance Bond: f588,000.00 5474,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: 5294,000.00 ;237,000.00 Monum~entation Cash Bond: ; 3,300.00 Copies of the agreement and securittiy are available in the City Clerk's Dffice. Letters of approval have been received from the Cucamonga County Nater District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respect ull s fitted, / < _~. c m~e s ~ Q RESOLUTION N0. 9~- IaO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROYIN6 IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, DRAINAGE ACCEPTANCE AGREEMENT, AND FINAL NAP OF TRACT N0. 23738 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 13738, consisting of 18 lots, submitted by Rodine Companies, Inc. Subdivider, located on the southwest corner of Almond Street and Sapphire Street, has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider for approval by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with Lhe requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Ffnai Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Drainage Acceptance Agreement and the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient improvement Security, and submits for approvai said Final Map offering for dedication for street and highway purposes the streets delineated thereon. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That sa}d Improvement Agreement be and the same 1s approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is aufhnW soA 4n aftaN 4hannln• mA 2. That said improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Finai Map deiineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City; and 4. That said Drainage Acceptance Agreement be and Lhe same 1s approved and the Mayor 1s authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Cierk is authorfzed to attest thereto. I RESOLUTION N0. l ~ - ~al A RESOLUTION aF THE C[TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNE%ATION OF CEATAiN TEAAIiOAY i0 LAN'uSCAP'e HATNir.HANCE 6ISTAiCT N0. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING tMINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 13738 NHEREAS, the City Council pf the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special awintenance d15tr1ct pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special aaintenance district knovm and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Llghtin9 Maintenance District No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and NHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and NHEREAS, at this bare the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and lncorporateA herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and NHEREAS, ail of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or sn"".. ,.c .~ c",.~.,"e.~~ "oo..,..r+ NOM, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLONS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative bogy hereby orders the annexation of the proper as shown in Exhibit "A` and the work progra~a areas as described 1n Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That alt future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including'tfieTe~-of all assesssents, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. 5~ 'A• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 il~, - i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONtiA ~' COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO z _,~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~37~ 8_ EXHIBIT 'B' PROJECT NAME: TR 13738 N0. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 18 lots N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 18 units STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of Lapps to be Annexed District No, >nwn »w~ 1 6 --- --- --- --- 2 12 --- --- --- --- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRZCT -f -d ., T- - District No. Street Name Sq. ft• y-Sq. ft.~.- Ea.- 1 Almond --- 2800 5 Sapphire --- 3640 24 JAA:3/21/90 5~- - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 21, 1990 ~'~ ?D; rtry Cnunril and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Millie Val Duena, Assistant Civil Engineer 'oJ"uJ~CT. n ruvai ai= im rovemeni n reemcny ~- .°~t.=''•=~ ='"- VV P 9 •^~N~:. ~.: ~~t Monumentati on cash deposit for Tract 13753, located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue, submf Lted by Victoria Cucamonga Partners, L. P. and release of previously submitted Improvement Agreement Security and Monumentation deposit accepted by City Council on January 18, 1589, from the Nilliam Lyon Company RECDMMENDATIOM It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution acceptf ng the subject agreement and security, releasing Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security accepted by City Council on January 18, 1989, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign and release said agreements and authorizing the Finance Department to refund the Monumentation cash deposit. ANALYSIS/BACKDROUND Map, Improvement Agreement anA Security far Tract 13753, located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue, was approved by City Council on January 18, 1989. The new Developer, Victoria Cucamonga Partners, L.P., is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: 5504,100.00 labor and Material Bond; 5252,050.00 Monumentat/on: S 9,000.00 CoDTes of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Resp t ~ifily~6mltted, / ~ l.~.l.----~ v . / ~ ~ ~~ ~ R -tom Attachments 1 I _ I ~}.~______________ Ij I~ I I~ I! I~ I~ IM I~ ~ I i ~-k -1 ~~ ~~ei r `t~ ap may, ~ Y ~T~~ -~~ J1M~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA xNan~n~a nnrr®ox n rr~ Irin ~~~ ~ ~~ 1~ u. a ~~. wiw w.o ~-"-"'-"-- ^_ - 1-` ~ V N n~:..TR /37.5 ~ Trrt.~ 5, RESOLUTION N0. -I~ ' I O~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADPROYING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT N0. 13753 AND RELEASING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMF.NY aun ccrLlplry PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ON JANUARY 18, 1989 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on March 21, 1990, by Victoria Cuca.~:o.^.ga Par*~ers, L. P. es developer, for Lira improvement of public right-of-way adiacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue; and release of previously submitted Improvement Agreement Security and Monumentation deposit accepted by City Council on January 18, 1989, from Milli am Lyon Company. WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Improvement Agreement and Bald Improvement Security by and the same. are hereby approved, release of previously submitted improvement Agreement Security and Monumentation Deposit accepted by City Council on January 18, 1989, from the Wttliam Lyon Company, and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreesent on behalf of the City of na u~im vu4 nnNllyO, OIIY LIIC VI Ly VICrR LU aLCCSL LIIereLO. 55 CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 21, 1990 L3 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Morks Inspector SUBJECT: Apprcval cf Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13644, located on the southeast corner of Nervosa Avenue and Yista Grove Street, submitted by Noodridge Estates Ltd. RECONEMDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. Md pursuant to Resolution No. 89-567, it is also eocowended that City Council continue to direct staff to grant no occupancies until such time that all improvements on Hermosa Avenue that are conditioned to be constructed are 1005 complete. DACKGROUND/ANALYSIS improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements for Tract 13644 were approved by the City Council on May 19, 1988, in the following amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: y496,000.00 Labor and Matertai Bond: =248,000.00 The developer, Noodridge Estates Ltd., is reQuesting approval of a 3 month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respec submitted, _ ..~' ~ _ r V ~<`v~ _ - / R y Attachments NORDIC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY February 12, 1990 Steve M. Gilliland '~~ Public Works Inspector .. City of Rancho Cucamonga ~' Post Office Box 807 AanrhO S'~~raIDOny°-, l`al ifornia 91]iQ Re: Dear Steve: Enclosed herewith you will find executed Requests for Extension of the Improvement Agreement, along with a fee in the sum of $251.00 payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Tract is nearing completion. We should not need any more than 90 days in which to complete the offsite improvements. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation. My direct dial number is (714) 474-4460. Very truly yours, WOODRIDGE ESTATES, LTD. ny: norcic uevetopmenc company, Its G~e~n~e~r~a, l~~P~a~rt/n/er HJK:dll GZLL. LTR CUR[MORT. CA 91)11 na pH1w 5~ Harri J. Keto, Secretary RESOLUTION NO. gO-Ia.3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA; APPROYIN6 IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13644 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension - -- --C -- --` °1 '.°4^ ti~ um.dridae Estates Ltd, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adiacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on Lhe southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and Vista Grove Street; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described 1n said Improvement Agreement and sub~ett to the tenas thereof, 1s to be done in coniunction with the development of said Tract 13644; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Imprevement Agreement Extension and said [mprovement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 58 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT OATS: parch 2i, i990 ~ T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City 'engineer ~ BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector ~_ .~ SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for DR 87-51, located on the south side of Arrow Route between Rochester Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Fontana Steel RECOMMENOATIOM It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the sub,~ect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for OR 87-51 were approved by the City Council on January 19, 1989, 1n the following amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: 5352,000 Labor and Material Bond: f175,000 The developer, Fontana Steel, is requesting approval of a 60 day extension on said tmprovement agreement. Gopies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectf s~bmitted, i ~~~~~ A1R~t:56: d1 Attach!w:nts F0/1TR11R srEE~1N~. ~+~ Reinforcing Steel •~•n~~ Post Olflca Bo% 2219, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 917232219 • 71418949993 FAX 71N8939799 February 20, 1990 Steve M. Gilliland ~~~~' ~~~ CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMDNGA Coaanani ty Develo meet Department/Engineerins Division nR ~ ~~~ p. o. Rnx Red GIy a Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 ~ aun.,Y._. Subject: DR 87-51. Extended Improvement Agreement Uear Steve, We are requesting a extension for our project, DR 87-51 Improvement Agreement, located at Arrow Highway west of Etiwanda Avenue. We are taking immediate action to completes the items the inspector did not approve per your letter dated February 26, 1990. Enr.losed are the completed forma and a check 3n the amount or 5251.00 for the fee. Si rcerely, FONTANA STEEL, INC. ~ ~. / Thomas M. Kaney Operations Manager W RESOLUTION N0. ~~- ~d~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT ExTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR87-51 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has far its consideration an Isprovement Agreement Extension executed on March 2i, 1990, by Fontana Steel as developer, for Lhe improvement of public right-of-way adJacent to the real ornnerty soeciflcally described therein, and generally located on the southside of Arrow Route between Rochester Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue; and NNEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subiect to the terms thereof, Ts to be done in conjunction with the development of said DR 87-51; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension 1s secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. C~ D- A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 21, 1990 TD: ~'. ty CGurnii dn'u City Etna^yer FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M, Gilliland, Public works inspector C'~ SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Conryletion RECOMMENDATION: The required street improvements for Tract 11606-1 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of =40,300, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 5403,000. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 11606-1 - located on the southwest corner of Victoria Street and Mango Street. DEVELOPER: El Capstan Development 940 South Coast Drive Y260 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) S 40,300 Release: Faithful Perfonaance Bond (Street) f4D3,000 Respec i~ bmitted, ~_. RHM: Attachment RESOLUTION N0. `7D ~~-J A RESOLUTION ~ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGl1, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC INPROYEMENTS FOR TRA,„ 11EOE-1 ANO AU'iHORIZIHG THE FILSN^u OF A :NICE OF CONPLETION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the construction of public improvewents for Tract 116Ofi-1 have been caaoieted m the satisfaction of the CTty Engineer: and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work 1s hereby accepted and the City Engineer 15 authortaed to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 21, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve N. Gilliland, ounlir uerks Inspector ~~ SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion The required street improvements for Tract 11606-3 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it Ts recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of 531,800 authorize the City Engineer Lo file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 5318,000. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 11606-3 - located on the southeast corner of Victoria Street and Mendocino Street. DEVELOPER: Grupe Development 940 South Coast Orive Y260 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) f 31,800 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 5318,000 Respec ~lY~t~bmitted, viiy' ~/ `~ j~,~ RHM:SMG:dIw Attachment RESOLUTION N0. ~~-'~Cp A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO f,IIf.AMDMGA; CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROYEMENTS FOR TRACT 11606-3 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COI~LETION FOR THE NORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 11606-3 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Ca~letion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. W i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 21, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gi1111and, Public storks Inspector~~ SUBJEGi: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECONEMDATIOM: The required street Improvements for Tract 13542-3 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recoanended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds in the amount of (48,000 and 52,880 authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bonds in the amount of (480,000 and 528,800. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 13542-3 - located on the northeast corner of Banyan Street and Canistel Avenue. DEVELOPER: Grigsby Development 8480 Utica Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Accept: STREETS BANYAN LANDSCAPE Maintenance Guarantee Bonds f 48,000 f 2.880 Release: Faithful Performance Bonds S 480,000 (28,800 Respectfully su4mitted, ~~ ~ ~ RHM:SMG:d1w Attachment RESOLUTION N0. ~ ~ - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS cna, rpari 1}5a?_} dun e~iru01{12I,u,O *, HE FILItw, uF A riuTiCE OF COMPLETION FOR THE iIORR NHEREAS, the construction of public faprovea~ents for Tract 1}5qz_} have been completed to the satisfaction of the Ctfy Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is reQuired to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, the Cify Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with Lhe County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: March 21, 1990 City Council and City Manager v Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public works Inspector`; Release of Maintenance Bond for Tract 11793 located on the east side of Amethyst between Highland Avenue and Lemon Avenue [t is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds Background/Analysis The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. OEYELOPER: Pennfteld Development 899 Production Piace Newport Beach, CA 92663 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) ;24,800 Respec ily'subm tted, ~ f ., _~_ RHM:SMG:dIw DATE: TO: FROM; 9T: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT - March 21, 1990 raw r^.CYiI and Ci ~ ., 4i nanagar Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Steve M. 611111and, Puhlic Horks Inspecto Release of Maintenance Bond for Tract 11853 located on the northeast corner of 19th Street and Ramona Avenue It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds Background/Analysis The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects 1n materials and workmanship. DEYELDPER: Roy E. Daly Construction 9035 Haven Avenue I102 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 54,250 Respectful ubmitted, ~.._~~ v. v ~_ RHM: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: T0: FROM: RV; SUBJECT: March 21, 1990 City Council and City Manager vw Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer ~",~ CTPVP M, Gilliland, Public Works Insoector~~, ~ Release of Maintenance Bond for Tract 11893 located on the southside of Banyan Street between Sapphire Street and Cucananga Creek RECOMMEIDATIOM: It is reconwended that Lhe City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Malntenance Guarantee Bonds Background/Analysis The required one year awtntenance period has ended and the street iaproveaa•nts rewain free froa~ defects in axtterlais and workaanship. DEVELOPER: California Coanunitles 31 Technology Drive 1200 irvlne, CA 92718 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond {Street) ;25,800 Respec 9 sub~aitted, i ~ /~ ~ r J RNM;SMG:dIw CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 21, 1490 T0: City Council and Vi ty Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 9Y: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks inspector I SUBJECT: Release of Maintenance Bond for Tract 12832 located on the ~ southwest corner of Victoria Park Larre and Victoria Windorws Loop REC01lEIMTIOM: It is recoaaended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds Background/Analysis The required one year axintenance period has ended and the street taryroveaK•nts reawin free frawt defects in saterials and rorkatanship. DEVELOPER: N1111a~a lyon Goagany 8540 Archibald Avenue, Su1te B n.~.b.. r........... r• 01'1011 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 21, 1990 T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: City Council and i.iiy rwnayer Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Morks Irtspecto~ Release of Maintenance Bond for Tract 13353 located at the northwest corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue RECOMIEMDATIOM: It is recosaended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds Background/Analysis The required one year abintenance period has ended and the street improvements rewain free frog defects in a~aterials and workawnship. DEVELOPER: ALH Ltatted Partners 1209 Via Zuwaya Palos Yerdes Estates, CA 90274 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 529,600 Respect u submitted, :~i.. :~~ R CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Narch 21, 1990 n T0: City Council and C1 L<Y Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BV: Michael D. Long, Senior Public Norks Inspector SUBJECT: Accept thie Etiaanda Cobbles~~ne Curl, contract No. 89-168, as colsplete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to File a "Notice of Completion'. It is recoamlended that City Council accept the Etlwanda Cobblestone Curb, Contract No. 89-168, as complete, authorize the Ctty to file a "Notice of Completion, authorize the release of the Faithful Perforsance Bond in the amount of f66,518.00, and accept the lOf Maintenance Bond in the amount of f3,044.49 for one year, and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of (3,044.93 and the labor and Materials Bond in the amount of (66,518.00 days after the recordation of said notice if rro claims have been received. Also, approve the final contract amount of 530,044.93. D"rVGDO11Yn/lw-I vCTC Thee subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifltatlons and to Lhe satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount is f30,044.93 which includes 1 contract change order for minor A.C. paving. The original amount approved by council was 230,516.00. Respec l,y tied, i ~/ ~ `__~ dttacnment ~~ RESOLUTION N0. I~- /ag A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON6A, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROYENENTS FOR ETINANDA COBBLESTONE CURB, CONTRACT N0. 89-168, AND ADTHOR 12iNG THE FILING QF A la1TiC_.F nF rfWDI FTTDm FDR 7HF NORK NHEREAS, the cunstructicn of public inprovements for Etiwanda Cobblestone Curb, Contract No. 89-168 have been completed to the satisfaction 07 Lne C1Ty Gngl Oeery dn0 NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonggaa hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 7.3 ~' March 21, 1990 CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA STAFF REPORT TC: Mayor, City Co until members and City Manager FROM: Jerry Grant, Building Official SUBJECT: NAZIIRDOUS MASONRY BUILDING MITIOAT ION ORDINANCE ~~o c~`~'`^+oy~9 <, x ~ O A F~ ~ ~Z U. > -_..-t9i RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council hold second reading and adopt Ordinance 417. BACKGROUND Af. the March 7th City Cmmr, it meeting, the Council gave first reading to the accompanying ordinance, but posed some questions relating to City participation in funding, to costs of accomplishing compliance with the ordinance, and, finally, in regard to intent of Lhe provisions establishing incentives for pre servo tton of ntstartc strut to res. ANALYSIS To better understand the process in achieving compliance, Limeframes outlining the steps to the. ordinance appear to be in order. A, The initial period of time referenced in the ordinance allows 270 days for the 8u ilding and Safety Oivision to notify owners of their responsibility to comply. During this ti mefra me, (but prior to sending the notice), the incentives referenced in Section 15,42.070 F for Historit al Buildings, are to be explored and established. The notification period was purposely extended during Historical Preservation Commission discussions to allow for staff preparation of mro pos als for programs to be considered during budget sessions, for development of funding sources on a state level and ../..A •A~• •I.n preparation or adv isur.y I ILC rU LIIrC• it was IIVt iri~ci~ c., u ur r~~ ordinance create specific funding commitments, ratherV that there be a commitment to explore all available resources for assisting in historical preservation. Once the above programs were explored and/or developed, (but not exceeding the 210 day limit), the Building and Safety Division may send nut the notices and order to comply. B, Nhen the notice and order is received, owners of property have an additional 270 day period to do one of three things; (1) to demonstrate through structural analysis, that their building complies with the seismic resistance level required by the ordinance; (2) to submit structural STAFF REPQRT: HAZARDOUS NASOMRY BUILDiN6 M1TI6ATION ORDINANCE M11RCH 21, 1990 PAGE 2 analysis and plans for al t.era tions to make their building comply; or, (3! to submit a letter of intent to demolish the building. 8y the end of an additional 90 days (one year after notification) the owners must obtain a building permit for demolition or alterations to achieve compliance. L. Those buildings that are to be altered must be completed within an additional 2 years. There are also provisions for administratively extending the time for ob to in my peru~Y or d-- tra ling c^mpl i=_^~e Where no hazard exists. Ezten sions beyond the ini tial~one Would be via appeal to the City Council. Since the last City Council meeting, and as a result of further field investigation and assessors records, we have confirmed that the affected Biane winery building aggregates some 81,000 sq. ft. An additional building that was formerly part of the winery site, has also been identified. This additi onai building is approximately 58,000 sq. ft. in area and is owned 6y American Foods Corporation The owners of the property have likewise been advised that their building is potentially subject to the strengthening requirements. In regard to costs for studies and compliance, figures vary dependent upon the type of structure and degree of alteration required. Figures gene ra ted 'rom local engineering firms and distributed at a recent conservation program in Los An ge?es, indicate costs, generally, as follows: a. Basic strengthening to meet minimum seismic resistance requirements avers oes apProx imately $6,50 per square foot based on City of Los Angeles experiences. b. Historic restoration, in itself, varies from $10 to $15 per sq. ft. c. Testing to esta b?ish allowable design values for strengthening, $1500 - $2500 per building. d. Structu rat analysis, from $.50 to $1.50 per sq. ft. e. Plan pre parati nn for alterations, $.50 to $2.50 per sq. ft. SUMMARY In summary, the seismic strengthening ordinance was not intended to commit the r;ry t~ cn^r;fic allocation of funds but rather for staff to explore alternative landing sources m,u make recomaer~ations 'nr `^^1!~si^^ i^ tn:• pending budget. Costs for retrofit vary, averaging about $6.50 per square ?5 STAFF REPORT; HAZARDOUS MASONRY BUILDING MII6ATION ORDINANCE MARCH 21, 1990 PAGE 3 foot for minimal strengthening; about $10 - $15 per sq. ft. for historic restoration; $1500 - $2500 for structural testing; $.50 - $1.50 per sq. ft. for strut turai analysis and $.50 - >2.50 per sq. ft. for plan preparation. /Res/pectfu l/fl~y submitted, erry .Grant Bui ing Official JRG:11 7(0 ORDINANCE N0. 417 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C[TY OF RAN Cf10 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 15 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 42 RF.f,ARn tNf, EA?THnupy,c un>nPD REDUCTION IN UNREINFO RC ED MASONRY BUILDINGS AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. RECITALS (i) The California State Legislature enacted the Un re in forced Masonry 3vildin9 Law (Chapter 250, Statutes of 1986; SB547--Alquist; Government Code Section 8875 Et. Seq.) requiring all jurisdictions in Seismic Zcne 4 to identify and develop a hazard mitigation program for all types of pc tentially hazardous bu ild inys. (ii) The adoption of this ordinance provides the necessary vehicle to comply with state regulations. ;iii) The proposed ordinance and the Uniform Code for Building Conservation are acceptable programs utilized in other cities and referenced in the "Seismic Safety Commission's" Guide Book. (iv) This Ordinance, wh i7e protecting the health and welfare of the Citizens of Rancho Cucamonga, also encourages the pre;e rvation of histori buildings as evidenced by reference to the State Historical Building Code, the provision of incentives and by requiring additional review prior to demolition for such bu ild ina s. (vj A duly noticed public hearing, as required by California rove rn ment Code, has been conducted and concluded prior to the adoption of this ordinance. (vi) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this ordinance have occurred. B. ORDINANCE NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and ordain as follows: SECTION 1: In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of 4hic nnA ina nrn SECTION 2: This Council hereby finds and certifies that the pro5ect has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Envfronmen- tal quality Act of 1970, and further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: Title 15 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Entitled eulldings and Construction, of the City Council of the Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby amended, provided that said amendment shall not apply to or excuse any violation thereof occurring prior to the effective date of this ordinance, ~ ~-y Ordinance No. 417 Page 2 SECTION 4: Title 15 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding Chapter 15.42 to read, in words and figures, as follows: Chanter 15,42 Earthquake Nazard Reduction in Unreinforced Ma sonry Buildings Sections: 15.42.010 Added -- Purpose ,c no non n., a..e c...no 15.42.030 Added -- Definitions 15.42.040 Added -- Rating Classifications 15.42.050 Added -- General Requirements 15.42.060 Added -- Administration 15.42.070 Added -- Historic Buildings 15.42.080 Added -- Anaiysis and Design 15.42.090 Added -- Materials of Construction 15.42.100 Added -- Information Required on Plans 15.42.010 Purpose. The purpose of this Chapter is to promote public safety and welfare by reducing the risk of death or injury that may result from the effects of earthquakes on Unreinforced masonry bearing wall buildings constructed before 1946. Such buildings have been widely recognized as sustaining Life-hazardous damage as a result of partial or complete collapse during past moderate to strong earthquakes. The provisions of this Chapter are minimum standards for structural seismic resistance established brimar ilv to reduce the rick of life lncc nr injury and will not necessarily prevent loss of life or injury or prevent earthquake damage to an existing building which complies with these stan- dards. This Chapter shall not require existing electrical, plumbing, mechan- ical or fire safety systems to be altered unless they constitute a hazard to life or property. This Chapter provides procedures and standards for identification and classification of unrein fo rced masonry bearing wall buildings based on their present use. Priorities, time periods and standards are also established under which these buildings are required to be structurally analyzed and anchored. Where the analysis determines deficiencies, this Chapter requires the building to be strengthened or demolished. However, the provisions of this Chapter do not preclude the err sn ruatinn of h,i 5hn nie hp it d:ngg ie faG Lr Cre Se vat` Of hi-tari buildings is encouraged through the permissive use of applicable portions of the State Historical Building Code (SH BC), established under Part 8, Titie 24 of the California Administrative Code. In addition, the City will pursue incentives to assist property owners in obtaining aid offered by Federal, State and local agencfes. These incentives are further elaborated on in Section 15.42.O70.F. !U Ordinance No. 411 Page 3 15.42.020 Scoue. The provisions of the Chapter shall apply to all buildings constructed or under construction prior to 1946, or for which a building permit was issued prior to 1946, which on the effective date of this ordinance have un rein forced bearing walls as defined herein. EdLEP"iiON: This Chapter siidii nct apply to d=tarhed one or two family dwellings and detached apartment houses containing less than 5 dwelling units and used solely for residential purposes. 15.42.030 Oefin itionc. For purposes of this Chapter, the ap p7 ica ble definitions in Sections 2302 and 2312, Uniform Building Code, 1988 Eu iiiun jiiob, iyoo Ed ii ionj anu the G„ro,.i ay ,..a„ Gj.j.7J: Crosswalis: Interior walls of masonry or wood frame construction with surface finish of wood lath and plaster, minimum 1/2 inch thick gypsum wallboard or solid horizontal wood sheathing. In order to be considered as a cross wall within the intent of this Chapter, the cross walls shall be spaced at not more than 40 feet apart in each story, and shall be full story height with a minimum length of one and one-half times the story height. High Risk Building: Any building having an occupant load of 100 occupants or more as determined by Section 3302, UBC, 1988 Edition. -t k%EPTI ON: Buildings meeting either or both of the following criteria need not be classified as high risk 6u ildin9 s. 1. Any building having exterior walls braced with crosswalls as defined above. 2. Any building used for its intended purpose, as determined by the Building Official, for less than 20 hours per week. Historical Building: Any building designated as an historical building by an appropriate Federal, or State Agency, or as a landmark by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and any building on a local, state, or national inventory of historic resources. Medium Risk Building: Any building having an occupant toad of mG re than 20, bct less than 100, as deta Tined by Set Lion 3302. UBC, 1988 Edition. Low Risk Building: Any 6u ilding having an occupant load of less than 20 occupants, as determined by Section 3302, UBC, 1988 Edition. 1 Ordinance No. 417 Page 4 Unreinforced Masonry Bearing Wail: A masonry wall having all of the following characteristics: 1. Providing vertical support fora floor or roof. 2. iidving a total superimposed load of over 100 pounds per linear foot. 3. Having reinforcing steel less than 50 percent of that required by Section 2407(h) 48, UBC, 1988 Edition. 15.42.040 Rating Classifications. Buildings subject to to is chapter sha 11 be classified by the Building Official as High Risk, Medium Risk, or Low Risk Buildings as defined herein. The total occupant load of the entire 6u it ding as determined by Section 3302, UBC, 1988 Edition, shall be used to determine the rating classification. EXCEPTIONS: 1. For Lhe Durpose of this Chapter, portions of buildings construc- ted to act ind epend entry when resisting seismic forces may be placed in separate rating classifications. 2. The Building Official may allow the use of a verified occupancy load rather than the occupancy load specified in Section 3302, UBC, 1988 Edition in determining the rating classification. 15.42.050 General Re uirement s. The owner of each building within the scnno of the rhantnr shAl rauxe a struc to rAl Anal vsis to he made of the building by a civil o~r structural engineer or architect licensed by the State of California; and if the building does not meet the minimum earthquake standards specified in this Chapter, the owner shall cause it to be structurally altered to conform to such standards; or cause the building to be demolished. A. Service of Order. The City shall have up to 270 days in which to serve the order as outlined in Section 15.42.060. B. Compliance. Upon service of the Order, the owner of a building, identified within the scope of this Chapter, shall comply with one of the following requirements: 1. Within 210 days after the service of the order, a •tructurat analysis shall be submitted to the 9uildirg Official for review. Such analysis shall demonstrate that the building meets the minimum requirements of this Chapter; or 8t~ Ordinance No. 417 Page 5 2. Within 270 days after the service of the order, the struc- tural analysis and plans for the proposed structural alterations of the building necessary to comply with the minintim requirements of this Chaoter shall be submitted; or ,,. 'r;i it.ir. 270 dais after ".he s=!+!ir? ~f the „rd e~y a lqf for of intention to demolish the building shall be submitted. Any proposed demolition of a historical building, as defined in Section 15.42.030. must first undergo landmark application review to determine the historical merit of the structure. In addition to review for landmark ~t~tcc .,- 8;,turic rre se rvacion wmmission shall determine the need for and required contents of a feasibility study to examine possible alternatives to denolition which may include a cost/benefit analysis, reconstruction alternatives, reloca- tion feasibility or other similar analysis determined necessary by the Commission, The study shall be completed by a City hired consultant, but financed by the applicant, and shall be reviewed by the Community Development Director or his designee and reported on to the Historic Preserva- tion Commission. C. Building Permit. After plans or letter of intention to demolish are submitted and approved by the Building Official, the owner shalt obtain a building permit., and commence and complete the required construction or demolition wit:^. in the time limits set forth below. These time limits shall begin to run from the date the order is served in accordance with Section 15.42.060 (A) anA !R1 1. The property owner shalt have 1 year from the date the order is served to obtain a building permit to complete structural alterations or building demolition. The property owner shall have a total of 3 years from date the order is served to complete construction of any structural alterations. EXCEPTION: The Building Official may allow an extension of time, for obtaining a building permit or demonstrating compliance with this Chapter as set forth in Section 15.42.050, of up to an additional one year, if it is demonstrated that there is no immediate hazard to life safety and that there wilt be Ov dd've rie iinLdLt ilaun dd id Ce nt ar'a ae rtie S. Aflv fU rth eP request for extensions ~of time shall be accomplished in the manner set forth in Section 15 .42 .O60.C for appeals. ~' Ordinance No. 417 Page 6 15.42.060 Administration. A. Service Of Order. The 8u ilding Official shall issue an order, as provided in Subsection (B) below, to the owner of each building wirh;^ the cope of this Ch ap te.r. Service of the utde, shall not occur until such time that the City Planner and Building Official shall determine that the incentive programs, referenced in Section 15.42.D70.F, are in place and operational, but shall be no longer than 270 days from the date of enaction of the Ordinance. B. Contents Of Order. The order shall be in writing and shall be served either personally or by certified or registered mail upon the owner as shown on the last equalized assessment, and upon the person, if any, in apparent charge or control of the building. The order shall specify that the building has been determined by the Building Official to be within the scope of this Chapter and, therefore, is required to meet the minimum seismic standards of this Chapter. The order shall specify the rating classification of the building and shall be accompanied by an informational pamphlet, as referenced in Section 15.42.070.F, which shall also include a copy of Section 15.42.050 and shall include alternatives and time limits for compliance. C. Appeal Order. the owner or person in cila rge or control of the building may appeal the Building Official's determination that the 6u ilding is within the scope of this Chapter to the City rnu nn it Cnn6 a o>l e_F ill 6n Fil nA wil6 !F e_ Auit Ainn nFft._ial within 30 days from the service date of the order of the Building Official. Any such appeal shall be scheduled for hearing before the City Council, not later than 60 days after the date that the appeal is filed. Such appeal shall be made in writing upon appropriate forms provided therefor by the Building Gfficial, and the grounds for appeal and the justification thereof shall be stated clearly and concisely. Each appeal sha 11 be accompanied by a filing fee as determined by City Council Resolution. D. Recordation. At the time that the Building Official serves the aforementioned and er, the Building Official shall file with the Office of the County Recorder a certificate stating that the subject building is within the scope of Title 15, Chapter 15.42, "Ea'r tho uake Raz and RedaC flan in unr'e in fG reed Ma iu arv BulidiFla s" of the~Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. The certificate shall also state that the owner thereof has been ordered to structur- ally analyze the building and to structurally alter it or demo- lish it where compliance with Chapter 15.42 is not exhibited. l_.1~ Ordinance No. 417 Page 7 If the building is either demolished, found not to be within the scope of this Chapter, or is found to be structurally capable of resisting minimum seismic forces required by this Chapter as a result of structural alterations or an analysis, the Building Official shall fil- 'rr`F ,tin Off: nc .hc Cou^,ty R^ crdcr ,. certificate terminating the ~sta to sn-of the subject bu i7ding as being classified within the scope of Title 15, Chapter 15.42-- "Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Un re in forced Masonry Buildings" of the Rancho Cucamo naa Mun is ioal Coda. tnforcement. If the owner or other person in charge or control of the subject building fails to comply with any order issued by the Building Official pursuant to this Chapter within any of the time limits set forth in Section 15.42.050, the Building Official shall order that the entire buii ding be vacated and that the building remain vacated until such order has been complied with. If compliance with such order to vacate has not been accomplished within 90 days after the date the building has been ordered vacated or such additional time as may have been granted by the City Council, the Building Official may order its demolition or abatement in accordance with the provisions of the procedure set forth in the Uniform Code for Abatement of Dangerous Buildings as adopted by Chapter 28 of this Title. 15.42.070 Historical Buildings A. Historic Preservation Review. Any proposal for the structural alteration or demolition of an historical building, as defined 6n en in ~F VII A.. ,6n Y.n_1_n_e:n Onn ~n n...,:.... nn n.~un ..n~..~':: Commission prior to issuance of any building or demolition permits. 3. Scope. The Commission sha it review all pions, proposed structural revisions and demolitions for preservation of historic character, quality of design and aesthetic considerations, review fee waiver requests and demolition feasibility studies and, make recommendations to the City Council regarding potential designation. C. Additional Information. Additional architectural elevations and details may be requested in order to provide clarification in review of the proposed revisions. u. "uener`dl. Th,. 4ia ndards and nrncadn ra_c actafiiichnd fiv Chic Chapter shall apply in all respects to an historical building except that as a means to preserve original architectural elements and facilitate restoration, an historical building may, in addition, comply with the special provisions set forth in this Section. W Ordinance No. 417 Page 8 Unburned Clay Masonry or Ado 6e. Existing or re-erected walls of adobe construction shall conform to the following: Un re in fo rced adobe ma cnn ry walls ch=_11 .^.at e =mod ~_ ho;~hr or length to thickness ratio of 5, far exterior bearing walls and must be Provided with a reinforced bond beam at the top, interconnecting all walls. The bond beam shall have a minimum depth of 6 inches. The bond beam may have a width equal to the width of wall less 8 inches. orov ided the resulting width is not less than n inches. Min inmm wall thickness shall be 19 inches for exterior bearing walls and 10 inches for adobe partitions. 2. Foundation footings shall be reinforced concrete under newly reconstructed walls and shall be not less than 50 percent wider than the watt above, soil conditions permitting. 3. New or existing unstabilized brick and adobe brick masonry shall have an average compressive strength of 225 pounds per square inch when tested in accordance with ASTM desig- nation C67. One sample out of five may have a compressive strength of not less than 188 pounds per square inch. Unsta bil ized brick may be used where existing bricks are unsta6ilized and where the building is not susceptible to flooding conditions or direct exposure. Adobe may be allowed a maximum value of 3 pounds per square inch for shear with no increase for lateral forces. 4. Mortar may be of the same soil composition and stabili- zation as the brick in lieu of cement mortar. 5. Nominal tension stresses due to seismic forces normal to the wall may be neglected if the wall meet thicknesses requirements and shear values allowed by this subsection. 6. Allowable stresses for archaic materials not specified in the UBC, 1988 Edition, shall be based on substantiating research data or engineering judgement subject to the Building Official's approval. 7. Alternative materials, design or methods of construction may be considered as set forth in Section 105 of the iinifnrm nuiidinn r.nde. iinit Ed it iiro. in add itfan. when d request for an- alternative proposed desfgn, material or method of construction fs being considered, the Bu ii ding Official may file written request for opinion to the State Historical Building Code Advisory Board for its considera- tion, advice or findings in accordance with the SHBC. $~ Oridnance No. 417 Page 9 Incentives. In order to encourage the preservation of historic structures, the following incentive programs are to be explored and information made available to property owners with buildings suh ier,t to the orov isions of this Chapter. This list does not preclude the use of alternatives not identified here. The Planning Division shall develop an informational pam- phlet, which shall he sent to property owners of buildings identified suhjert Lo the prpv itipnc of th i5 Chapter, which Shall be ". Ed concurrently With the nrd er cper;fied ;p Section 15.42.060. A. The pamphlet shall explain the basic provisions of SO 547 and this Ordinance and shall outline the various options and incentives available to property owners including financial assi sta ne:e and design consulta- tion. The City shall provide funds which may be used Iowa rd design consultation for owners of historic structures. The City has funds which may be available for this use through Lhe Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program and through the Historic Preservation section of the Planning Division budget. Wf th in 6 months from the effective date the Ordinance, program guidelines shall be developed for use of these funds. 3. As a majority of the historic un re in fo rc ed masonry build- ings are within the Redevelopment Project Area, available funds may be used toward historic rehabilitation. 4. The City shall investigate the possibility for setting up a local loan program for Seismic rehabilitation as referenced in the California health & Safety Code Sections 55000 through 55009. An analysis and determination of the feasi- bility for setting up the program shall be made within 5 months from the date of enaction of the Ordinance. If it is determined that a program is to be developed, then the criteria, guidelines and enabling legislation shall be developed within 270 days from the effective date of the Ordinance. 5. Upon request, the City shall provide information about the Mills Act to owners of historical buildings. The Mills Act allows property tax benefits in exchange for preservation of a build inn. 6, The Historic Preservation Comni ss ion may recommend to the City Council waiving applicable buflding permit, plan check, design review, land use and landmark alteration fees for historic structures which are designated local Land- marks, or for those structures determined to be significant VJ Ordinance No. 417 Page 10 through the landmark review process. In review of the request, the Historic Preservation Commission shall give consideration to the architectural and historical merit of the proposed seismic retrofit and/or structural alteration. Additional financing may be available through State and Federal agencies and may include: a. Tax credits for rehabilitation which are available under the 1986 Tax Act. To be eligible for the higher 20% historic building tax credits, the cons iruc iivri documents must be approved by the State Historic Preservation Office and National Park Service. 6. Funding for Seismic retrofit may also be available through the Small Business Administration (SBA), and may be used for encineering, planning, permits and construction costs. Borrowers shall include businesses that meet the agency's size standard and eligibility requirements. 15.42.080 Analysis aril Design. A. General. Every structure within the scope of this Chapter sha 11 be analyzed and constructed to resist minimum total lateral se isric forces assumed to act ncncc nc urre ntly in the direction of each of the main axes of the structure in accor- dance with the following equation: V=ZI KCSN (FORMULA III-1) The value of KCS need not exceed the values set forth in Ta 67e No. III-A (Exhibit "A" attached) based on the seismic zone as determined by the Building Code. The value of Z shali be the value specified in Table No, tII-B (Exhibit "A°). The I factor sha 11 be as specified in Table No. III-C (Exhibit "A"). The value of W shall be as set forth in the Building Code, 1988 Edition. Lateral Forces on Elements of Structures. Parts or portions of structures shall be analyzed and designed for late rai loads in accordance with Subsection (A) above and Chapter 23, UBC, 1988 Edition, but not less than the value from the following equation: Fp=ZI Cp sNp (FORMULA tII-2) ~b Ordinance No. 417 Page it For the provisions of this Subsection, the product of IS need not exceed the values as set forth in Table No. III-D (Exhibit "A") The value of C need not exceed the values as set forth in Table No. III-M (EPxhibit "G" attached) The value of W shall be as set forth in the Uniform Building Cnda_, 198 tdition. EXCEPTI OtI: Un re in fo rc ed masonry walls may be analyzed in accordance with Section 15.42.090. C. Anchorage and Interconnection. Anchorage and interconnection of all parts, portions and elements of the structure sh ail be analyzed and designed for lateral forces in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, 1988 Edition and the equation F =ZIC SY (Formula II1-2) as modified by Table No. III-D (Exl~ib it p"A"Q Minimum anchorage of masonry walls to each floor or roof shall resist a minimum force of 2D0 pounds per linear foot acting normal to the wall at the level of the floor or roof. Level of Required Repair. Alterations and repairs required to meet the provisions of this Chapter shall comply with all other applicable requirements of the UBC, 1988 Edition, unless speci- fically provided for in this Chapter. Required Analysis. Except as modified below, the analysis and design relat%ng to the structural alteration of er.istirg struc- tures within the scope of this Chapter shall be in accordance with the analysis specified in Chapter 23, UBC, 1988 Edition. 1. Continuous Stress Path. A complete, continuous stress path from every part or portion of the structure to the ground shall be provided for the required horizontal forces. 2. Positive Connections. All parts, portions or elements of the structure shall he inte rcenn ec ted by positive means. Analysis Procedure. Stresses in materials and existing con- struction utilized to transfer seismic forces from the ground to parts or portions of the structure shall conform to those per- mitted by the UBC, 1988 Edition, and those materials and types of construction specified in Section 15.42.090. Materials and connectors used for interconnection of parts and portions of the structure shall r..nnform to the UBC, tone edition. Except as modified herein, unre in forced masonry walls shall be analyzed as specified in Sections 2416, 2418, and 2419 of the UBC, 1988 Edition, to withstand all Vertical loads as specified in Chapter 23, UBC, 1988 Edition, in addition to Lhe seismic forces required by this Chapter. U Ordinance No. 417 Page 12 No allowable tension stress will be permitted in unreinforced masonry walls. Walls not capable of resisting the required design forces specified in this Chapter shall be strengthened or shall be removed or replaced. EXCEPTIONS: Un reinfo reed masonry walls may be analyzed in accordance with Section 15.42.090. [, lln re l^i0 rc eu ina aunty na iia nit iii ~a„y i o~y6 ':,~..~ other than its own weight may be considered as veneer if they are adequately anchored to new supporting elements. 3. The 50 percent increase in the seismic force factor for shear walls as specified in Table No. 24-H of the UBC, 1988 Edition, may be omitted in the computation of seismic loads to existing shear walls. Combination of Vertical and Seismic Forces. All new materials introduced into the structure to meet the requirements of this Section which are subjected to combined vertical and horizontal forces shall comply with Section 104(6) of the UBC, 1988 Edition, except as follows: Stresses in existing lateral force resisting elements due to a combination of dead loads plus live loads plus seismic loads ma.v be increased 100 percent over allowable working stresses specified in the Uniform Code, 2988 Edition, however, shall not exceed those permitted by Section 15.42.090. Stresses in members due only to seismic and dead loads shall not exceed the values permitted by Section 2303(d) of the UBC, 1988 Edition. Calculated tensile fiber stress may be reduced by the full direct stress due to vertical dead loads. 15.42.090 Materials of Construction. All materials permitted by the UBC, 1988 Edition, including their appropriate allowable stresses and existing configurations of materials specified herein may be utilized to meet the rang irwmentc pf this fh an tw r, Existing Materials. In addition to the materials permitted by the Uniform Building Code existing configurations of materials specified in this section may be utilized as outlined below. 8$ Ordinance No. 417 Page 13 Un rein fore ed Ma sonrv Wali s. a. Un re in fo rced masonry walls analyzed in accordance with this Section may provide vertical support for roof and fl oar construction and resistance to lateral loads. The bonding of such walls shall oe specified in Section 2312(b) of the UBC, 1988 Edition. b. Tension stresses due to seismic forces normal to the wall may be neglected if the wall does not exceed the height or length to thickness ra tlo and the in-plane shear stresses due to seismic loads as set forth in Table No's. III-E (Exhibit "B") and III-I (Exhibit "E" a?tae hed ). If the wall height-thickness ratio exceeds the specified limits, the wall may be supported by vertical bracing members designed in accordance with Section 15.42.080. The deflection of such bracing member at design loads shall not exceed one-tenth of the wall thickness. EXCEPTION: The wall may be supported 6y flexible vertical bracing members designed in accordance with Section 15.42.080 (B) if the deflection at design loads is not less than one-quarter nor more than one- third of the wall thickness. All vertical hra r. ina mamharc ch all ha attarhnA fn floor and roof construction for their design loads independently of required wall anchors. Horizontal spacing of vertical bracing members shall not exceed one-half the unsupported height of the wail nor ten feet. The wall height may be measured vertically to bracing elements other than a floor or roof. Spacing of the bracing elements and wall anchors shalt rat exceed six feet, Bracing elements shall be detailed to minimize the horizontal displacement of the wall by components of vertical displacements of the floor or roof. All unreinforced masonry walls utilized to carry .ertical loads and seismic forces pa ra it el and perpendicular to the wall plane shall be tested as specified in this Subsection. A11 masonry quality shall equal ar exceed the minimum standards esta611shed herefn or shall be removed and replaced by new materials. A14ernate 84 Ordinance No. 417 Page 14 methods of testing may be approved by the Building Official. The quality of mortar in all masonry wails shall be determined by performing in-place shear tests or by testing eight-inch G ialiie ter cures. Hi to roar ive metnoas of testing may be approved by the Building Official. Nothing shall prevent pointing with mortar of all the masonry wall joints before the tests are first made. Prior to any pointing the mortar ~ni!!hf mse} hn eL°.d ..A ~1e M !n ennv lop Gn and deteriorated mortar. Mortar for pointing shall be type S or N except masonry cements shall not be used. All preparation and mortar pointing shall be done urd er the continuous inspec tian of a Registered Deputy Building Inspector. At the conclusion of the inspection, the inspector shall submit a written report to the licensed engineer or architect responsible for the seismic analysis of the building setting forth the result of the work inspected. Such report shall be submitted to the Building Official for approval as part of the structural analysis. All testing shall be performed in accordance with the requirements specified in this subsection by a testing agency approved by the Building Official. An accurate record of all such tests ar~d their location in the building shall be submitted to the Building Official for approval as part of the structural a naloc ie ii. The minimum number of tests shall be two per wall or line of wall elements resisting a common force, or 1 per 1500 square feet of wall surface, with a minimum of eight tests in any case. The exact test or core location shall be dete rnitned at the building site by the licensed engineer or architect responsible for the seismic analysis of the building, subject to approval of the Building Official. iii. The bed joints of the outer wythe of the mass n ry shalt be tested in shear by laterally displacing a single brick relative to the adjacent bricks in that wythe. The opccsite head .iafnt of the brick to be tested shatl~ be removed and cleaned prior to testing. The minimum quality mortar fn BO percent of the shear tests shall not be less than the total of 30 psi plus the axial stress in the wall at the point of the test. The shear stress shall be based on the gross area of both bed 90 Ordinance No. 417 Page 15 joints and shall be that at which movement of the brick is first observed. iv. A minimum number of mortar test specimens equal iu the nua'uci Gf 'i eyJ ii ed GLieS ibaii be prepdieS from the cores and tested as specified herein. The mortar joint of the outer wythe of the masonry core shall be tested in shear by placing the circular core section in a compression testing machine with the mortar bed joint rotated 15 degrees from the axis or the appiie~ ivu.i. The mortar joint tested in shear shall have an average ultimate stress of 20 psi based on the gross area. The average shah be obtained from the total number of cores made. If test speci- mens cannot be made from cores taken then the shear value shall be reported as zero. 2. Existing material configurations including wood shear walls utilized in said configurations may be used as part of the lateral load resisting system, provided that the stresses in these materials do rwt exceed the values shown in Table No. III-G (Exhibit "C" attached). B, St reng th eniny Of Existing F{a to vials. New materials including wood shear walls may be utilized to strengthen portions of the existing seismic resisting system in the described configura- tinnc nnnv id arl That thn ctre ccoc An not nvro od iho ua Linc ehnun in Table No. III-H (Exhibit "D" attached), C. Alternate Materials. Alternate materials, designs and methods of construction may be approved by the Building Official in accordance with the provisions of Section 105, UBC, 1988 Edition. D. Testing of Shear Bolts. One-fourth of all new shear bolts and dowels embedded in unreinforced masonry walls shall be tested by a Registered Deputy Building Inspector using a torque calibrated wrench to the following minimum torques: 1/2" diameter bolts or dowels = 40 foot-lbs. 5i B" diai'n2 ter `u0it5 yr 'uv W2is = 5D fe3t-ibi. 3/4" diameter bolts or dowels = 60 foot-lbs. No bolts exceeding 3/4" shall be used. A11 nuts shall be Installed over malleable iron or plate washers when bearing on wood and heavy cut washers when bearing on steel. ~I Ordinance No. 417 Page 16 G. Determination of Allowable Stresses for Design Methods Based on Test Results, All ova ble stresses for design methods based on test results shall be as follows: Design seismic in-plane shear stresses shall be substanti- ted by itn r~..s., nd SpC :«: a,~ Cc~tinn iS.47.090. Design stresses shall-be rrelated to test results obtained in accordance with Ta61e No. III-I ;Exhibit "E"). Intermediate values between 3 and 10 psi may be interpolated. r,. :.. ~«.. ~, f., nfcrced ry having min imum~design shear value uof ~3 PSI shall -not exceed 100 PSI. 3. Design tension values for un re info rc ed masonry shall not be permitted. Anchor Tests. Five percent of the existing rod anchors utilized as all or part of the required wall anchors shall be tested in pullout by an approved testing laboratory. The minimum number tested shall be four per floor, with two tests at Walls with joists parallel to the wall. The test apparatus shall be sup- ported on the masonry wall at a minimum distance of the wall thickness from the anchor tested. The rod anchor shall be given a preload of 3C0 lhs. prior to establishing a datum for record- ing elongation. The tension test load reported shall De record- ed at one-eighth inch relative movement of the anchor and the adjacent masonry surface. Results of all tests shall be reoort- ed. the report shall include the test re Butts as related to the wall thickness and joint orientation. The allowable resistance value of the existing anchors shall be forty percent of the average of those tested anchors having the same wall thickness and joist orientation. Qualification tests for devices used for wall anchorage shall be tested with the entire tension load carried on the enlarged head at the exterior face of the wall. Bond on the part of the device between the enlarged head and the interior wall face shall be eliminated for the qualification tests. The resistance value assigned the device shall be twenty percent of the average of the ultimate loads. 15.42.100 Information Reouired nn Planc, A. General. In addition to the seismic analysis required elsewhere in this Chapter, the licensed engineer or architect responsible for the seismic analysis of the building shall determine and include the information required by this Section on the approved plans as follows. 9` Ordinance No. 417 Page 11 All unreinforced masonry walls shall be anchored at the roof level by tension bolts through the Wall as specified in Table No. III-H (Exhibit "D"), or by approved equivalent at a maximum anchor sDac ing of six feet. All unreinforced masonry walls shall 6e anchored at all iiuu ra wiiii to ns iun baits tivau gn ii~e waii ur Ly exiiLiuy rod anchors at a maximum arx:hor spacing of six feet. All existing rod anchors shall be secured to the joists to develop the required forces. Tne Building Orfic ial may require testing to verify the adequacy of the embedded ends of existing rnd anchors. Tests when reou fired sh ail conform to Section 15.42.090 (H). When access to the exterior face of the masonry wall is prevented by proximity of an existing bu iidin9 wall anchors conforming to 5 and 6 in Table No. III-H (Exhibit "D") may be used. Alternative devices to be used in lieu of tension bolts for masonry wall anchorage shalt be tested as specified in Section 15.42.090 (I ). 2. Diaphragm chord stresses of horizontal diaphragms shall be developed in existing materials or by addition of new materials. 3. Where trusses and beams other than rafters or joists are suooorted on masonry, ledgers or columns shall 6e installed to support vertical toads. 4. Parapets and exterior wall appendages not capable of resistfng the forces specified in this Chapter shall be removed, stabilized or braced to insure that the parapets and appendages remain in their ar fig final position. 5. Ail deteriorated mortar joints in unreinforced masonry walls shall be pointed with type S or N mortar (Masonry cements shall not be used). Prior to any pointing, the wall surface must be raked and cleaned to remove loose and deteriorated mortar. All preparation and pointing shall be done under the continuous inspection of a Registered Deputy Du ilding Inspector certified to inspect masonry or re nr rn tc, At the cuM lu spar. of the project, the inspec tar shall submit a written report to the Building Offfciai setting forth the portion of work inspected. 6. Repair details shall be provided for any cracked or damaged unreinforced masonry wall required to resist forces speci- fied in this Chapter. 1~ Ordinance No. 417 Page 18 7. The type and dimensions of existing walls and the size and spacing of existing floor and roof members. 8. The extent and type of existing wall anchorage to floors and roof. g. nwura ie iy uimensioned fioor pions and masonry wall elevations showing dimensioned openings, piers, wall thickness and heights. S0. The location of cracks or damaged portions of un re in fo rced 11. The type of interior wall and ceiling surfaces and if reinstalling or anchoring of ceiling plaster is necessary. 12. The general condition of the mortar joints and if the joints need pointing. SECTION 5. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Oa~il Re o~rt, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of ntart0 'o, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 9~l Ordinance No. 417 Page 19 B L A N K P A G E (signature page) 95 Ordinance No. 417 TABLE ~-A Page 20 AORIZOxTAL !'ORC6 FACTORS BABEA ox occvrurr Lowe fYNiR1T "A" OCCUPAAT LOAD `q Bufldtng with an occupant load greater than 100 All others 0.133 0.100 TABLE III-B 2 FACTOR ~bISY1C ZONb FAC7'DA 7ANE 4 1 TABLE B'I-C I FACTOR occvrAACr rwccoA Ail BuLLdtnga (High. Medium R [,ow Rtak) 1.0 TABLE III-D FOR PART'a OR POR'iI0III8 O! RATQfO CLAJNRICATIOIf I1 High Rlak BufWfng Medium 8 Low 171ak 8ulldlny 1.00 .75 TABLE ~-S RSOVIATED ELEfdxTs svaaava ram za'mo a Wails: h/t Ratb x Tenabn bolo Ibending) x In-Plain ahaar x Panpeb x floors and Rao6: DlaphnQrt attaaa and x dlaphn{rn chords Ordinance No. 417 Page 21 EXHIBIT "B" 7ABLEIII-F ALLOWAL3I8 VALU& OF HE[GAT•THICffiVE88 RATIO OF UNRERYFORCF.D MASOI'IRY WALLS WI.TB MIIVI![IJM QUA[11T 11[ORTAR is aoaonfaa wrra caoeaantn N Di/IIRD K IRC. 18Aa.0l0 w¢or>®t. dpp,~pd Walla of Onc Story Buildings 18 13 flint Story Watl o! Muttl-Story BuBdinga IB 15 Walla m Top Scary a! 14 Multl•Story Bulidlugs B W ~,4f+ ^^~+ I 18 I 13 ~ M1Nmum qualllq mortar shag be detmmtned by laboratory tnting W accordance with SeMlm 15.42.090(U. °Table IIJ-G b not applicable to bulldh~t olntlrW elasalBptlon I. Wa1L atbuLdhrIDt arttldn rat.67g rya-1n,.~H... I shall be as+atyzed to accordarce with Section 13,42,1180(q. Ordinance No. 411 Page 22 EX4I6IT "C" TABLE 7II-G VALUES FOR EffiSTING MATERIALS NEW MATQiIACS OR CONFIG[1ItATIOn OF MATERIALS ~ A(J,OpA~J,' VAL069 1. HORIZONTAL DIAPHRAGMS a. Roofs with straight sheathing and raoflng l00 an, / R for aPPlled directly [o the sheathing. sefsmte shear. b. Roofs alth diagonal aheatteng and tooling 400 ms. / R Cor applied drectly to the sheathing. adsmlc sheer. e Floors with atratght tongue and grows ~ 150 me. / R far sheathing. seJamle shear. d. Floors with straight sheathing and Rmahed 300 a». / R Car wood Oooring, setsmtc shear. e. Floor with diagonsl sheathing and 9nfshed 460 ~. / R for wood Ooonog. seismic shar. f. Flours ar roofs with atnught shea0tln$ and Add 60IDs. / R W plaster appbed to the Jast or r.Ren, the agowable Values fa Items lARC 2 SHEAR WALLS 100 a~ / R a a. Wood stud walls with lath and plaster, stile for seismic shear. 3. PIAQf CONCRETE F0017NG5 f - 1600 DA unless o slwwn b9 tmb, 4. DOUGIA.R F42 WOOD Allowable stress same u 11 D.F, ~ a :.~.'>`G;a.;rc ~:~;;. a - le,two tbs. / .Q. ' msatmttmd a sltutetvRAL sl>xL a.;ao.ooo>b.. / W ' mwmttma ' -tatetal must be aotittd and m t~ cmdltfaa a 7lte wood 4th sod p4ate mwt be resttaclfed 4 ad.tms JdW or noes m ^ tiYnne spptawed by fire Bttudlttft Oa1cW. s 9trasses ~'m mq be Iot:euM for usmbltrtlsos otlads as spedaed to Sealm 1 .410aD Im ~. Ordinance No. 417 Page 23 EXHIBIT "D" TABLE DI-H ALLOWABLE VALVES OF NEW INATERIAI,e USED IIri CONJVIYCTION WITH E7QBTW0 CONBTRVCTION xcw f(wi'lOW3J ola coxnovRwxfox or HAI'cRIAIS I stl2.trvwBu 1. t10RiZONTAt DIAPHRAGMS v e ~ ~Ya'OOa aneattung aPPrtce avxc[tY aver erostutg t+'argl+f ahething with ends of ply.veod sheet same u aPectned to s di `as~a or Plr..~m loe.~ i~ o~ «ni~r or tneiwe 4 Table 23J of 1IBC. ee ed.. rer bloek.a . tlrtg beards. abpnr.gm,. 2. SHEAR WALLS a. Plywood sheathing applt<d dtreetly over nds[Ing Same u values wood studs. No value shall be given to plywood applied aver cxisttng plaster or wood aheathmg apecdled !n L-HC 'gg Ed . b. Dry wail yr Plaster applied directly over Watfrtg .. Tabk 2S-K for shear wails. Y39e of th l wood studs. e va ues ____. ' '99 Ed.. Table s67-I. ~ c. Dry was er plaster aPPlled m plywood aheathtttg 33 1/996 dote over odatln8 wood studs. value sPecfricd fn t)BO. '99 Ed., Tabk a47-I. ,.. SHEAR BOLTS Shear bulb Et deweb embedded a aYrt. of e' m<o 10096 of the value uttmfnferced maaoruy walla. Bolt centered Ina 2 - for plain masonry -I/2 diameter hole with dry-pack or non-ahndt ~ ~C' grout around cimumferlnce of bolt or dowel.ta 'tie Ed„ Ta DIe e24-O. N! values Iaryer Chart <hoae gWen for 3/Y bolb aerate be used. 4. TENSION BOLTS Teoaton bulb R dowels onending enttreiy thmvgh 1200 lfa, per bole utttltdorced masonry walls secured w/bl~t~trt~ or dogrel. plate on far aide of wW with at lent 90 q.' o(atY o[ ama. 9.0 3. WAIL ANCHORS (15.62.100 Ib1 U. ' .a w u.e uaerror race of vte wY with a 2.1/2" mend Diate und@ the head. l+utW Y 900 Iba. bolt. iW apltdded /or shear bolts. Spaeed not tlaaar than 12' on cettexg. La•0 6. Holt or dowel extenditta to the tsnertor taco of " 1200 IN. per bolt er she wall with a 2-1 /2 round plate under the bed dowel h drill at b wttgle d 22-1 /2 d to the . honsontal. ItvtallM u e ed fee bolu.t~2•s 7, INF'BLED WAt t a Rebtfotecd mabrtry fnhllld epltltrraa to ettletlrre untelnfomed tiYYRry waha with keys or daw l .9amC Y value a ie d ( e a to match teWDrcing. pec e or utve4rfomed e. REINFORCED MASONRY maYrtry wWe. ttty pteeg do wW! tVatf¢teM per Ste. 2{17. ~ee Fd Liam! Y valtan ep!¢tped 1n Tebi! ~ B, tJBC. 'eB Fd. 9. HP'JNlKIRr~' r•OwCeL ~~ t-'OttOreN ~• taelle erld kte rM(Omed Y ~°t° 2e, elee.4ee Ed.. a el.tp,.e rer w ped°id b LLma Y VeIUe .pactpad clu en b wa 2e. UBC, ae l~ o. 6Xlxlwo POUHDAaoN LowDa aleulated tadattry Fetmdatbn lode Wr etrucetatee athlblhnt rte eNd¢raa of Yttlement. aunda9an lettda < o taardmum dpd t0 a tYW Y epcleed In e.a. 2 Bolo artd dowses t0 ire 1 /2 Ytch mwmum In dlamRer, ~ DelUbts far b¢he and dewe4 a1W1 W torte trltL an alaetnc rotary dNl. impact tools ehW not W used for dn/Wt~ Itolea or t/g+Jtttn4rs anchor end Ordinance No. 417 Page 2q E%NIBIT "E" TABLE III-I Ai3~ WASI.& 8°lEAR S'!'.~.°~_a vno ~mcmvn UNREINFORCED M/1.90PiRY WALLS Bo46 OF LEST RESOLT9 ' AVGtAIit 1'66T REBDLTB 86I81rtC Ilf•PLAr1E 8~i1A BAYD 06 0'i PSI NO r LESS TBAII OE' C081W Qi P81 68086 ARFA 30 plus axial atreaa p y peP 40 plea axial atras 27 4 paP ~ 5 ~ I00 plus axW same or more 67 or mote 10 pq max' 'Allowable ehesr etrees may be locreaeed 6y addltieo of 10%of the axial ahrx due to the weld of the wall directly above. TABLB III•J: TI1~ LITmTS _.w.nr wrm»nvt C08~ OOy6yLCl'6 AC72011 ~ M r!MM7frt!1T(Na Comp let e - 1 ` StTVelu, W Alteraaom or e~llae,q Damnation lyear IBO dq+a• 2yema Wall Anchor Inatallaaon 190 day6 lLtl days' 1 gear 'Measured from date o[bu0dln~ permit faawxe. Ordinance No. 417 Page 25 'c XHIBIT "F" TABLE DI-B: SERVICE PRIORITIES AND E7LTENDED TIME PROVISIONS IL;l77NC OCCOPANT I@IDiOI[ EII~IOR Q CLA98IFICATTON LOAD 1711E P19tI006 'I71d ATl'ER WALL lOR NICE AAC810R8 AA6 OOM®t B1!?AtlSD Hlgh Rlsk Hutlding 100 or mace 270 days 180 dqa Medium Rlak More than 20 270 days 180 dWe BuOding but lean than 100 Low RYk Hutldtvg Len flan 20 270 days 1 yer •Meuuced from Ox'decOve date o(thL artkle. TABLE DI-L: SORIZOMCAL 10RCL' BAGTOAB HASEA ON RATING CIMBIIHGTIOIr RA77Ita cwamCw77oN DICE [itgh Rlslc BuOdtn~ Medium/Low Etlalc BuOdlny O, I33 0.100 Ordinance No. 417 Page 26 EXHIBIT "G" TABLE DI-1K: HORIZONTAL FORCE FACTOR "Cp " Frli{ P21RT$ AR f>ti)F'1't(1N„4 OF BUII.DIIYGS OR OTHER STRUCTURES i PART OR 1"ORT[ON OF Ht1II.DH'10 ~pK ~1'40N VAUIE OF C c Exterior bearing & non-beazina walls, ~ ~ 1n[enor b<anng walls & partitions, In[erfor non-bearing walls & partitions over 10' In helghL masonry Cences over 6' Normal [o In height. Flat SurCae< 0.20 Cantilever parapet & ocher canitlever Norma: [o walls, except retaining walls. Fla[ Surface 1.00 EM<rior & Interior ornamentations and appendage. Any direction 1.00 When connected to or part of a building; towers, tonics, towers & tanks + contmU racks over 8'3' In height .contents, chimneys, smokestacks, and 2 pmthousea. Any dlrectfon 0.20 Wh<n connett:ed to or part of a bullding: Rgid and rlg!dly mounted equipment and machinery no[ required for continued operaCOn of essential s Any Honzontal 3 occupancla. Dlrectfon 0.20 Tanks + eH<ctfve contents resting an ground. Any direction 0.12 Floors and roo6 acting as dtaphtagnu. [n the plane of e the diaphragm 0.12 Pretabriwted structural elements, n[hcr than walls, with force appLed at curter Any Horizontal o(gravlty of assembly. Dlrectfon 0.30 COnnlCtlOne fOr lXllClOi penlla Of elemenq. Any direction 2,0 i See Section 15.42.080(b) for use of Cp z When located m the upper portlon of any btWdktg with a ratlo o[ S to 1 or grwter the value shall be Increased by 5046. 3 Fo: ax'bl! and 9exibty mc•W :eel rY.:ipment ar. mschtr-z:Y. Lh! s^prep:Lt! values for Cp shall be determined with conaideratton glum [o both t~te dynamic propartles of the equlpmmt and mnchlnrry, and to the building or atnrcluro to which it V placed. ~ The W far stQage raeb shall be the weight of the nrJu plus contmta. The value of foe tacks over two storage support levels W height shaLL be 0.18 for the levelb below the top two levels. s'Ihe design of the equlpmmt and machinery and their anchorage Is an Integral part of the deslgtt and spetlflcatlon of such egWpmmt and machinery. 'Ihe stnrcture to which the egWpmmt or machinery L mounted shall be capable of resuting the anchorage foror~ face also Section 2319 a), UBC. '88 Fd.). e Floor and roo6 acting u dupphragtru shall be destgrfed for • minimum force resultlry from a Cpof .12 apphed to W unl'as a grater fort! reaulb from the dLtribution of lateral forces W attordsntt with Section 2912 (el. UBC. 'g8 Fd. Ordinance No. 411 Page 27 'c$HIBIT "H" Glossary of Symbols and Notations ~ = nu nee ricai Coefficient as specified in Section 2312(d), UBC, 1988 Edition. Cp = Numerical Coefficient as specified in Section 2312 (g) and as set to rtn in Table No. 23-J, UBC> 1988 Edition. D = The dimension of the structure, in feet, in a direction pa ra 11e1 to the applied forces. f~ = Specified compressive strength of concrete, psi. Fp = Lateral forces on a part of the strut cure and in the direction under consideration. ft = pl lowa ble tensile stress, psi. hn = Height in feet above the base to level n. I = Occupaxy Importance Factor as set forth in Table No. III-C. S = Numerical Coefficient for site-strut W rz resonance. V = The total lateral force or shear at the base. M The total dead load as defined in Section 2302, UBC, 1988 Edition, including the partition loading specified in Section 2304(d) therein where applicable, Wp = The weight of a portion of a structure or nonstructural component. Z = Numerical Coefficient for locations in Zone 4, Z=1. - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA STAFF REPORT llA'I'E: March 21, 1990 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager BY: Olen Jones, Senior Redevelopment Analyst SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINANCING AND REFINANCING OF A PORTION OF THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BY THE RANCHO CL'CAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the attached resolution approving the financing and refinancing of a portion of the Rancho Redevelopment Project by the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency... BACKGROUND: In February, 1990, the Agency approved the structure and sale of tax allocation bonds to finance projects identified in the redevelopment plan, and to restructure the Agency's existing bond issues. ANALYSIS: A portion of the Agency's 1984 and 1986 Tax Allocation bond issues were used to finance the Agency's obligations under OPA 84-I, for the Regional Shopping Center. Because the bonds used to finance the Agency's obligations are among those being restructured, it is necessary to comply with the federal Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA). This act requires that the City hold a public hearing to receive comment on the intended use of these funds. Following the TEFRA hearing. the approval of the resolution will conclude all !ega! actions required of the Ag_enc_y and City relating to the sale of these bonds. R~espec~tful,~l~`Fy'~ ",s,~Fu-~b-~~m~i~tted, Linda D. Daniels Deputy City Manager RESOLUTION NO. ~~ -l A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING k'1 NANCING ANU REFSNANCI NG OF A PORTION Vk• THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BY THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WHERr:AS, the Rancho Cucamonga Nedevelopment Agency (the "Agency") is authorized pursuant iw~Cbapiec 8 (uuuuueuu- ing with Section 33000) of Part 1 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code (the "Act") to issue bonds for any of its corporate purposes; and WHEREAS, the Agency is authorized pursuant to Sec- tions 53580 through 53590 of the Government Code of the Slate of California (the "Refunding Law") to issue its refunding bonds; and WHEREAS, the Agency has heretofore issued $7,750,000 aggregate principal amount of its Rancho Redevel- opment Project Tax Allocation Bonds, 1984 Series A (the "1984 Bonds") and has also heretofore issued $10,500,000 aggregate principal amount of Rancho Redevelopment Project Refunding Tax Allocation Honds, 1987 Series A {the "1987 Bonds"); and WHEREAS, the Agency has incurred an obligation to me city or naneno cueamonga (tne ••City••) in the amount of $1,495,455 as repayment to the City of expenditures made by the City on behalf of the Agency with respect to various public improvements provided for in the redevelopment plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project, which repayment obli- gation is evidenced by a reimbursement agreement between the Agency and the City dated as of May 1, 1987 (the "Agency Obligation"); and WHEREAS, the Agency in order to provide f'or the refinancing of a portion of the Rancho Redevelopment Project Ithe "Project"), has indicated its intention to issue up to $125,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Rancho Redevelop- ment Project, 1990 Tax Allocation Bonds, (the "Bonds"), the proceeds of which will be used to refund the 1987 Bonds ••-.-•• ..,, w2 avoY `uJru~ dii u' d pJtiiu,i iii the Agency~Obligation; and~V WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing to be conducted by this City Council with respect to the proposed refinanc- ing of a portion of the Project by the Agency was duly published at least 14 days prior to March 21, 1990 in a ©J newspaper of general circulation in the City of Rancho Cuca- monga, which notice set 7:00 p.m. on March 21, 1990, grid the City Council chambers at the Lions Park Community Center as the time and place for said hearing; and WHEREAS, this City Council is ti,e applicable gov- ernmental unit to conduct said public hearing for purposes of Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"); and ._... .^„ ,. - ty ii Lea duly neio said pub- lic meeti•ngn and hea~ring~with~respect to said portion of the Project proposed to be refinanced and its proposed refinanc- ing by the Agency, all in accordance with Section 147(f) of the Code, at which public hearing interested individuals were given a reasons 6le opportunity to express their views on the proposed refinancing of a portion of the Project by the Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. A royal of Financin This City Coun- cil hereby approves the financ ng and refinancing of a por- tion of the Project, which constitutes a "redevelopment activity" as such term is defined in the Act, by means of the issuance of up to $125,OOD,000 principal amount of the Agency's Rancho Redevelopment Project, 1990 Tax Allocation uonas, pursuant to provisions of the Retunaing Law ana the Act. This approval is intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 147(f) of the Code. Section 2, Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 21st day of March, 1990. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: De ra J. A ams, City Clerk _2_ f jb0073 / O/„ Dennis L. Stout, Mayor -~----- C1TY OF RANCHU CUCAMO~VCA STAFF KEPOKT DATE: March 21, 1990 TO: Mayor attd Members of the City Council FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager BY: Olen Jones, Senior Redevelopment Analyst ~~~~~v ~~ ; SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution regarding projects benefitting the Rancho Redevelopment Project and making certain findings in regard thereto (Ledig House). RECOMMENDATION: Approve the attached Resolution authorizing the expenditure of Redevelopment Agency funds for [he rehabilitation of the Ledig House. BACKGROUND: The O. P. Ledig house was designated as a Landmark by the City Council on August 3, 1988. On March 7, 1990, the City approved the application for a landmark alteration permit to relocate and restore the Ledig House for the purpose of housing Community Services staff and services. ANALYSIS: California redevelopment law requires that before a redevelopment agency can expend funds for public improvements, the City Council must first make the following findings: 1. "That the buildings, facilities, structures or other improvements are of benefit to the project area or the immediate neighborhood in which the project is located." The relocation and rehabilitation of the Ledig douse to serve as office and resource space for Community Services staff and programs will provide a greater level of service to the residents of the projects area. The Neighborhood Center, adjacent to the proposed site for the relocation, provides primary service to a large number of residents of the project area. This project falls within the "community/cultural facilities" identified in the Redevelopment Plan. d 2. "That no other reasonable means of financing such buildings, facilities, structures or other improvements, are available to the community." To date, the private sector has not produced a qualified bid for the relocation and rehabilitation of the Ledig House. In order to preserve this identified historical community/cultural facility, it is necessary for the City/Agency to assume the Icad role in the relocation and rehabilitation of the house. No financial resources have been identified in the City's budget for this. However, the Agency has budgeted $100,000 for historical preservation. It is therefore proposed [hat these funds be designated for the relocation and rehabilitation of the Ledig House. Respectfully submitted, Linda D. Daniels Deputy City Manager ~C RESOLUTION NO. "/d-13c~ A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGARDING PROJECTS RF.NF.FiTTIN[: THF. RANt'HQ RF'r)F}/EI!)DMF7VT agnJECT AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS [N REGARD THERETO. A. Recitals (i) The Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California (Health and Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq.), among other provisions granting powers to redevelopment agencies, contains Section 33445 which provides that a redevelopment agency, with the consent of the legislative body, may pay all or part of the value of land for and the cost of the installation and construction of any building, facility, structure or other improvement which is publicly owned either within or without a project area upon a determination by such agency and such legislative body by resolution that such building, facility, structure or other improvement is of benefit to such project area and that no other means of financing the same are available In the community. (ii) The officially adopted Rancho Redevelopment Plan of the Rancho r~urmm~mn Rrrlrvrlnnmrnt 4arnrv !°thie Annnrv' hn.a:n orrr.l provides uin part for the construction of community/cultural facilities to serve said project area, which include such projects as the rehabilitation of the Ledig House ("Project" hereinafter). (iii) Pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 33679, this Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the subject of the Agency's partial funding of the Project and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution. R. Resolution. tif}W, THFR$FnRii~ hr it fn~,nd dnterminnrl and rncnlyn~,i L,y t{;e ('p~nr„1 ~i the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby finds that the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. 1'he City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby consents to the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency's funding of costs and X09 expenses related to the Project pursuant to Health attd Safety Code Section 33445 in a total estimated amount of $100,000.00. 3. This Council hereby specifically finds and determines that the cunsiructiun of Cite Fruject by and through tine Agency's funding will be of benefit to the Agency's Rancho Redevelopment Project. 4. This Council hereby specifically finds and determines that no other ieaennahle means of finannina is availahly to fhn rnmmun:a. _....~ to construct the Project other than through the Agency's funding thereof as consented to herein. 5. The City Clerk shall testify to the adoption of this Resolution. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of 1990. Mayor 1, DEBRA ]. ADAMS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting ... ..... .y ...... ...... ... ..... ..~ ... ..~.. ...... .. ....... ..b. .. o ..u ... day of _ 1990, andywasVfinally passedyat a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga day of 1990, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCB. MEMBERS: NOES: COIJNCR. MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCB, MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCB.MEMBERS: Ciiy Clcik of the Ciiy of Ran1.11V Cucamonga llo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON~ REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF REPORT DATE: March 21, 1990 TO: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Deputy Director BY: Olen Jones, Senior Redevelopment Analyst SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution regarding projects benefitting the project area and making certain findings in regard thereto (Ledig House). RECOMMENDATION: Approve the attached Resolution authorizing the expenditure of Agency funds for the rehabilitation of the Ledig House. BACKGROUND: The G. N. Ledig house was designated as a Landmark by the City Council on August 3, 1988. On March 7, 1990, the Cirv annroved the annlicatinn fora landrnark alteration oennit to relocate and restore the Ledig }louse for the purpose of housing Community Services staff and services. ANALYSIS: California redevelopment law requires that before an Agency can expend funds for public improvements, it must first make the following findings: "That the buildings, facilities, structures or other intprovetnents are of benefit to the project area or the immediate neighborhood in which the project is located." The relocation and rehabilitation of the Ledig }}ouse in serve a.c office and resource snaee for Commwnity Services staff and programs will provide a greater level of service to the residents o f the projects area . The Neighborhood Center, adjacent to [he proposed rile for [he relocation, ~Uc provides primary service to a large number of ,2P reside[[[s of the project area. This project falls ~~ within the "community/cultural facilities" identified ~ /~ in the Redevelopment Plan, o 2. "That no other reasonable means of financing such buildings, facilities, structures or other improvements, are available to the community." l'o date, the private secr..r hae not produced a qualified bid for the relocation and rehabilitation of the Ledig House. In order to preserve this identified historical community/cultural facility, it is necessary for the City/Agency to assume the lead role in the relocation and rehabilitation of the house. No financial resources have been identified in the City's budget for this. }Iowever, the Agency has budgeted $100,000 for historical preservation. It is therefore proposed that these funds be designated for the relocation and rehabilitation of the Ledig House. Respectfully submitted, / / X ~ /V ~I'/ N I O v / +- Linda D. Daniels, Deputy Director ~~ 1 RESOLUTION NO.:~f)`oo(p A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REGARDING PROJECTS BENEFITTING THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS [N REGARD THERETO. A. Recitals (ij The Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California (Health and Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq.), among other provisions granting powers to retlevetopment agencies, contains Section 33445 which provides that a redevelopment agency, with the consent of [he legislative body, may pay all or part of the value of land for and the cost of the installation and construction of any building, facility, structure or other improvement which is publicly owned either within or without a project area upon a determination by such agency and such legislative body by resolution that such building, facility, structure or other improvement is of benefit to such project area and that no other means of financing the same are available to the community. (ii} The officiaiiy adopted Rancho Redevelopment Plan of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency ("this Agency" hereinafter) provides in part for the construction of community/cultural facilities to serve said project area, which include such projects as the rehabilitation of the Ledig House ("Project" hereinafter). (iii) Pursuam to California Wealth and Safety Code Section 33679, the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the subject of the Agency's partial funding of the Project and concluded said (tearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, he it found, determined and resolved b;~ the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency as follows: 1, This Agency hereby finds that the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2, This Agency hereby specifically finds and determines that the construction of the Project by and through the Agency's funding will be of benefit to the Agency's Rancho Redeveloptnenl Project. 113 3. This Agency hereby specifically finds and determines that no other reasonable means of financing is available to the community to construct the Project other than through the Agency's funding thereof as consented to herein. 4. Phis Aeency hereby specifically finds that the financial obligations which it will undertake to construct the Project will not impair its ability to discharge any financial obligation previously undertaken by it with respect to its Rancho Redevelopment Project. 5. The Chairman and Executive Director of this Agency are authorized to take any and all actions necessary [o cause this Agency to fund the construction of the Projects in the estimated amount above specified and any and all funds heretofore expended by this Agency for [hat purpose hereby are ratified. 6. The Executive Director shall testify to the adoption of this Resolution. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of 1990. Chairman I, JACK LAM, Executive Director of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at x regular meeting of said Agency held on the day of 1990, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of said Agency on the day of 1990, 6y the following vote: AYES: ACINCY MEMBERS: NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS: ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: ABSTAL*IED: ACf~.CYiviEIiBERS: ATTEST: _ City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ~~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: March 21, 1990 7"u: Hayur and nembere of iiir vi iy Cuwicii FROM: Brad Railer, r,'ry Plz.^..^.er 8Y: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner ' ~~ SUBJECT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 - The adoption of the Preliminary Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds for the Community Development Block Grant Application for the fiscal year 1990-91 based on an anticipated grant of $433,000.00. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions: A. Receive for Aiscu ssion and public input the Preliminary Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds for fiscal year 1990-91; B. Assess flood plain imparts and consider alternatives to proposed projects located in the 6a se flood plain; and C. Direct staff to prepare a Final Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds for future adoption 6y the City Council, II. ABSTRACT: [n accordance with NUD requirements, staff has prepared the Preliminary Statement of Community Development 06jec Lives and Projected Use of Funds (Preltmfnary Statement) for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program for fiscal year 1990-9?.. In accordance with the Citizens' Participation Plan adopted by the City Council for the C08G pros ram, staff reouested suggesti^_ns from the pu bl' rega rd my the use oT the CUBG funds. The Preiimina ry Statement incorporates these suggestions, and provides staff's recommendations regarding the use of funds. The Preliminary Statement also includes numerous public policy elements and certifications which are required by law. HUD regulations require the City to hold a public hearing regarding the Preliminary Statement and to take public input regarding the use of funds. Following the public hearing, Staff CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CDBG APPLICATION FV 1990-91 March 21, 1990 Page 2 will incorporate public input and any additional City Cru ncil direction into a Final Statement which is to be presented to the City Council for adoption at a later date. III. BACKGROUND: CDBG funds are provided by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to cities and counties based on a fn rmula which considers the co-..-icy ~, population, extent of poverty, and the age of the housing stock. For fiscal year 1990-91, Rancho Cu camonaa anticipates receiving $433,000. Approx rma tely $86,600 of this will be used for program administration, including the required fair housing services. The remaining $346,400 is available to support eligible activities. To be eligible for CDBG funding, activities must meet one of the two following criteria: A. Improve the living environments or employment opportunities of lower-income persons, either by providing benefits directly to lower-income persons or by providing improvements to areas occupied primarily by lower-income persons. In Rancho Cucamonga, only the North Town and Southwest Cucamonga neighborhoods, and one street in Alta Loma, qualify under this provision. 8. Prevent or eliminate community blight or blighting influences. In addition, the CDBG regulations provide that at least 60 percent cf :.1; `,. -ids ~~~u~t i,~ uir et i.ed co acnvttres meetrng the lower- income benefit criteria. IV. ANALYSIS: The Planning Division solicited suggestions from the community for projects to be funded under the CDBG program. Staff recommends that the following activities he funded: A. Housino Rehabilitation E H0,000 Continuation of the provision of grants, amortized loans and deferred loans to lower-income occupants of single-family residences as an fncen Live to maintain and upgrade this element of the housing stock which otherwise might fall into disrepair due to the lack of resources of the owners. -- rrescrva Eion incen iii ves 20 100 Continuation of the provision of grants and amortized loans to owners of historic properties as an incentive to maintain and upgrade historic properties by making repairs essential to eliminate code violations and Conditions detrimental to public health and safety. ~~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT COBG APPLICATION FY 1990-91 March 21, 1990 Page 3 C. Southwest Lu camonaa Street Imorovements 240 000 Continuation of the multi-year program to design and construct street improvements, including roost ruc lion of curbs, gutters and sidewalks, in the Southwest Cucamonga neighborhood. The Cuca.^.!o.^.ga County ka ter District wi ii be given an opportunity to uonradn ~, ter .-d ;ewer lines in conjunction with the City's project, The following activities are proposed: I. Construction of improvements for Vinmar Avenue, north of Salina Avenue and Salina Avenue from Ca laveras Avenue to Sierra Madre Avenue. 2. Oes ign of improvements far Vinmar Avenue, from 9th Street to Chaffee Street. 3. Design of improvements for Sierra Madre Avenue, from 9th Street to Chaffee Street. 4. Construction of improvements for Ca la veras Avenue, from Arrow Highway to 9th Street. 0. Senior Shared Housing 6 300 Continuation of the program providing a ma tchina service for u was niw wiaii CO 5na re [Welt homes with Senior Citizens lh need of housing as a means to increase housing choices and promote independent living among lower-income senior citizens, E. Administration 86 600 Support for the administration of the Comnuni ty Development Block Grant program, including activ itf es to coordinate the implementation of the COBG program with the City's other community development and planning activities. This project also includes the following activities: Fair Housing: Continuation of inland Media *_ior. Board's provision of public education, med to lion, counseling and legal referral services to promote fair housing. The City is required by the CDDG program regulations to provide these services. Cost: E4 ,333 I I CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT C OBG APPLICATION FY 1990-91 March 21, 1940 Page 4 Landlord/Tenant Mediation: Continuation of Inland Mediation Board's provision of mediation services for landlords and tenants to promote fair and lawful treatment by all parties in regards to disoutes between landlords and tenants. The prnnram includes coordination w?th the City's Code Enforcement activities. cost: E4 ,462 F. Alternatives to Flood Plain Impacts Staff has provided, along with the Preliminary Statement, an analysis of the potential impacts of the above-described activities on designated flood plafn zones. HUD regulations require that the City Council consider alternatives. Staff recommendations for alternatives and mitigation measures are presented in the Preliminary Statement. CONCLUSION: In summary, staff recommends the following activities be funded through the City's 1990-91 CDBG program: Housing Rehabilita Lion ................... ........ $ 80,000 Historic Preserva tfon ................. ... .. ...... S 20,100 Senior Shared Housing ........... ......... .. ......E 6,300 Administration ................. ....... ......... .. 86 600 TOTAL $433,000 Re e y su bn e Brad. ul City a ier BB:LJH/j fs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Preliminary Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds ~rS Preliminary Statement of Community Objectives for the 1990-91 Community Development Rlnrk Grant Program City of Rancho Cucamonga wN,c~w ~ssoa~aEs r~rraa+s a Pxr[a4 Much, 1990 -~9 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJEC17VE3 AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS FOR THE 199x91 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MARCH 1990 /~ o I. INTRODUCTION 1 [I. PROPOSED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 3 III. PROPOSED STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES 4 IV. SUGGESTIONS FOR THE USE OF FUNDS 6 V. PROPOSED USE OF FUNDS 10 VI. POTENTIAL, IMPACTS TO FIAOD PLAINS AND PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES 13 VII. PROPOSED STATEMENTS OF POLICY 16 A Citizens' Partiapation Plan 16 B. Relocation Assistance Plan 17 C. Residential Anti-Displacement Plm 18 D. Criteria for Substantial Change 20 VIII. CERTIFICATIONS 21 A Grantee Certifications 21 B. Certification Regarding Drug•Free Workplace 24 C. Certification Prohibiting Excessive Force 27 D. Certification Regarding Lobbying 27 wldn\rpt\rp61 '' ~~w %091 ~'J6.f. ~~ / L OF FIGiJRE3 Fi¢ure No• Ds~utivn Ea¢4 Floodplain Boundary Map 15 ~~ The Preliminary Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of F;ads is the primary document intended to provide the residents of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with an oppommity to review and comment upon the ways in which funds from the wmmuniry Beveiupmeui biucit Grani (CDnv') program are to be used to support neighborhood improvement activities throughout the City. This document establishes a comprehensive set of tong-term goals and short-term strategies which will most effectively target these important resources to meet the community's needs. The Preliminary Smtemerv is speci5cally designed to encourage participation by all residents of the City in identifying the community's housing, community development, and public service needs, and in evaluating the strategies which are proposed to meet these needs. Upon completion of the citiunc' partdpaton actinides which aze preserved herein, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cltcamonga will approve a Final Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds and authorize the City Manager to incorporate the statement into the City's application for funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) under the CDBG program for fiscal year 1990-91. THE COMMUNTI'Y DEVELr~PMENT BLM'K GRANT PROGRAM The CDBG program is funded by We federal government through the U.S. Department of HUD. The program provides federal funds directly to cities and counties for a variety of housin¢, communiri development and public service activities. The amount of funds which may be received by each eligible city and county is determined by a mathematical formula which measures the community's population, the age of the housing stock and extent of persons living in poverty. Each Ciry and county derides for itself how the money can best be used to meat the unique needs of its residents. Within the guidelines established by the program, each city and county evaluates its own needs, then designs and operates activities to meet those needs. The primary goals of the CDBG program are to improve the living conditions and economic opportunities of lower income persons, to prevent and eliminate crotnmuniry blight and blighting influences, and to meet urgent needs for which no other r•~o+ur~ txe Iv found. A ~' 'coon of N? percxnt of tha bsnetits pf the I:DBG funded activities must be directed to activities which assist lower income persons; either by providing benefits and services directly to lower income persons, or by improving neighborhoods which are occupied primarily by lower income persons. Preliminary Statement 2 of Objectives ~ 2 -1- THE CD P .i nTiON Each yeaz, communities wishing to re«ive CDBG funds must provide to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development an application, along with an evaluation of the community's needs, long-term goals, short-term objectives, and proposed activities for the corning year. The application also includes several statements of policy regarding haw CDBG funds will be used to minim;~r displacement of residents, provide relocation benefits where necessary, and evaluate the need to re«ive additional rnmmunity input prior to amending its propoxd activities. Finally, the application must also include a series of «rtifications by which the community agrees to meet the requirements of federal law in carrying out its CDBG funded activities. rnt~•t~!i rnrrrv p RTICIPATION IN THE CDBG A_PDLCATION PROC>=SS In preparing the CDBG application, each community is required to establish a Citizens' Participation Plan that provides the public an opportunity to review and comment upon the proposed uses of CDBG funds. The Citizens' Participation Plan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga is included is this document. In accordaa« with the Citizens' Participation Plan, the CDBG program staff solicited ideas for projects to re«ive CDBG funding during the ttpcomirtg year. Letters were xnt to all community groups and agencies which have previously submitted suggestions, as well as to all aty departments. An advertisement was published in the local paper inviting additional suggestions. All Suggestions for the .m. of +6~ fi,ndc which warn received by the CDBG MOQI'all/ staff ate summarized in Section N, below. A public hearing on the Preliminary Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds is a required part of the Citizens' Participation Plan. Followdng the public hearing, City staff will revix the Preliminary Statement, as necessary, to incorporate suggestions from the public and prexnt the Final Statement to the City Council for approval. Nob«s of the public hearing to be held on dte Preliminary Statement of Objectives and Projected Ux of Funds were published is the local paper on March 9, 1990. Written comments were requested from persons who would not be able to attend the public bearing. Any written comments, which may be rexived will be prexated by the CDEG prng:am sty a: the public 6earng. Preliminary Statement of Objectives /~ -2- In order to integrate the projects and activities undertaken through the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program with other housing and community development actvites undertaken by the City anti to ccwrdinate tong-term goals and short-term objectives, the Ciry Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby adopu the following Community Development Play THE GENERAr. PLeN The General Plan is the primary document establishing the goals and objectives of the housing and community development projects and activities to be undertaken by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Al! projects and activities undertaken through the CDBG program aze to be in compliance with the General Plan In addition, in selecting projects and activities to be undertaken through the CDBG program, the City will first consider thou projects which most directly serve to implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan. THE HOUSING ASSISTF~NCF vLAN The Housing Assistance Plan, which is prepared each year for submission to the U.S. Department of HUD, is the primary document establishing the goals and objectives of the 6ausing development, mortgage and rental assistance, and residential rehabilitation aciivities to be undertaken by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Hnusin¢ Assistance Ptan is to be orensred in compliena with the Housintt Element of the General Place fn developing the Housing Assistaaa Plaq the Ciry will first consider those projects which most directly carve to implement the goals and objectives of the Housing Element. ~OMMUNTI'Y REDEVELOPMENT A NCY c CIFI Pi aNc The Specific Plans adopted by the Community Redevelopment Agency are the primary documents establishing the goals and objectives of the Cottuntmity Redevelopment Agenry funded activities to prevent and eliminate blight and blighting influences is the City of Rancho Cucamonga In selecting projects and activities to be undertaken thrnugh the CDBG program in lawerincome and Community Redevelopment Agenq target areas, the City will fast consider thou p%Ms which mos? direely serve ?o itnpietnen? dte gems and objectives of tge Specific Places. Preliminary Statement of Objectives '~ -3- In order to establish longterm goals and objectives for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby adopts me [ollowirtg Staumene of l:ommumry lvelopment Objectives: ('OMM[INITY DEVEIAPMENT OBJECTIVES :. T^ .....:..:. W.a .r.°htl'.xe a. _ v.:g e:ghb.^:h^^dS r: n.i eliminate blight and blighting influenas~ and toVeliminate mndidoas detrimental to the health, safety, and public welfare. 2. To upgrade the City's substandard rental and owner-occupied housing stock through various farms of financial assistance for residential rehabilitation. 3. To provide improvements to public areas and public facilities which make them more uxtui and attractive, including developing and improving parks and recreational facilities. 4. Ta fund public xtvices which improve the quality of the living environment and complement physical developttunt activities bring conduMed in the City. 5. To fund public xrvices which improve the quality of life for lower-income persons, including senior citiuav and handicapped persons, 6. To assist with the expansion of facilities and public urvices which improve the quality of life for xnior citizens. 7. To provide incentives for the prexrvation of historic properties through the elimination of structural code defudenaes. 8. To provide information and affirmative support toward the goal of ensuring that all residents Gave access to a decent home of their choice in a suitable living envimnmeut 9. To provide the administrative capacity m implement the City's CDBG progiam, talc hotisittg, and landlord/tenant mediation xrvices, and to :CL`Z'dtnnte t*..e resCareh, p ~ and ~p!emenztien of General Plan and Housing Element revisions. Preliminary Statement ~~ ~O of Objectives 4- In order to provide for the development of specific activities in support of the goals aztd objectives described above, the City Council of the City of Rancbo Cucamonga heretrv identifies the fo[lowinq specific needs to be mst through the CDBG program: Financial assistance for owners of single-family residences occupied by lower- inrnme households to encourage housing rehabilitation is needed to improve the quality of housing affordable to such persons, and to prevent the deterioration of the housing stock which otherwise might result from a tack of resources for housing maintenance available to owners of housing affordable to such households. The provision of such assistance also contributes to the City's general efforu to promote housing quality standards and eliminate structural code deficiencies city-wide. 2. The provision of incentives for the rehabilitation of historic properties and the elimination of structural deficiencies is needed to prevent and eliminate blight, blighting influences, aced conditions detrimental to public 6ealtlt and safety. 3. The continuation of the City's ortgoing efforts to design and construct street improvements in the Southwest Cut~monga area is needed to improve the living environments and prevent the deterioradon of the transportation infrastructure in this older neighborhood 4. The provision of counselling and referral services to assist senior citizens in locating shared housing is needed to promote independence, acrd to increase the availability of high-quality affordable housing choice for senior citizens. Preliminary Statement of Objectives ~ ~ S- In acrnrdaoa with the Citium' Participation Plan adopted by the City Council for the (7ity of Ranchn CStsatnnnoon, fnr the Comm~~nity Devetooment Block Grant (CDBG) program, staff' requested suggestions from the public regazdittg the use of CDBG foods for fiscal year 1990-91. Lettets were sent to all community groups and agencies which have previously submitted suggestions, as well as to all city departments. P.n advertisement was published in the Iocal paper inviting additional suggestions. The following activities were suggesud by community groups and city departments. Staff has provided recommendations regarding the funding of these programs based on the goal of continuing and supporting the programs and priorities previously auihoriud by the City Council for the CDBG program. A. ON IN pR aMS i. Ho+~ Reh h'h Ation Program a. Description of Activity: Continuation of the provision of low- inurest loans and grants to owners of singlafamily residences oavpied by lower-income households as an incentive to maintain and upgrade this element of the housing stack, which otherwise might fag into diuepair due to the Lack of resources of +ha rnvnera. b. Staff Rernmmendation: Sniff recommends the rnntinuation of support for the Housing Rehabilitation Program 2. Historic Preservation Lncentives Progr,~ a. fkxTiption of Activity: Continuation of the provision of grants and low-interest loans to owners of historic properties as an incentive to maintain and upgrade historic properties by malting repairs essential to eliminate code violations aced conditions detrimental to public health sad safety. b. Siaff R:,asmtacadation Stay r:,~mm; nds the ~ntinuation of support for the Historic Prexrvation Inaatives Program. Preliminary Statement of Objecrives /~ -6- 3. SonLt+west Ctice_monaa Street famrwemeet Prom a Description of Activity: Continuation of the multi-year program to design and construct strttt improvements, including construction of curbs, gutters and sidewalks, in the Southwest (,ttcamonga area Adtiitionai street improvements proposed for the 1990.91 program year include: the completion of construction of improvements to Vinmar Avenue, north of Salina and Salina Avenue, from Calaveras to Sierra Madre; design of improvements to Vinmar Avenue, b..~. *?_•~ 6~_ to Chaffee Street; design of improvements to Sierra Madre Avenue, from Ninth Street to Chaffee Street; and the partial funding of rnnstmction of improvements to Calaveras Avenue, from Arrow Highway to Ninth Street b. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the continuation of support for the multi-year Southwest Cucamonga Street Improvement Program. 4. Senior Stared Housing Procram a Description of Activity: Continuation of the program providing a matching service for those who wish to share dte¢ home with senior citizens in need of housing as a means to increase housing choices and promote independent living among lower- income senior citizens. b. Staff Rernmmendation: Staff recommends the continuation of support for the Senior Shared Housing Program. CDBG PrnYrIL Administration a Description of Activity: Support for the administration of the CDBG program, including activities to coordinate the implementation of the CDAG program with the City's other community development and planning activities. This project also includes support for the fair 6ottsirtg and landlord/tenant mediation programs. b. Staff Recommendation: Continued support for CDBG Program Administration is necessary in order to continue itaplementadon of the CDl3Cr Program. Prelitniaary Statement Q of Objectives ~~ ( •7- B. PROPOSED NEW ACITVTI'fE5 Minor Home Repair Pro~L 1 DC58. ptian ..i e.`.rv';~w. RO!'L..._. of ~'..^...._ et SL` „art nn a v- pr rnatract basis for a minor home repair program to be operated by We Oldtimers Foundation of Fontana. This program is proposed by the Oldtimers Foundation The Oldtimers Foundation home repau program prexntly serves xnior citizens in wo wuu;a.;;iij u:: --,d.o.:.aW~ v :.L '-- `...^. ••:.:.:,. of age or older and who awn their homes or mobile homes receive minor home repairs directly provided by employees and volunteers of the Oldtimers Foundation. The average repair involves S35 worth of work. The Foundation proposes to expand the program to include residenu of the City of Rancho Cucamonga The Foundation requesu S50,000 for the xrvices. b. Staff Rernmmendation: Staff recommends not funding the Oldtimers Foundation Minor Home Repair Program. Staff recommends that all funds available for residential rehabilitation be allocated to the ongoing Housing Rehabilitaiov Program. The Housing Rehabilitation Program is designed to prexrve the community's housing stock eliminate conditions detrimental to health and safety, and to convert substaedard 6ottsing to safe, decent, and affordable t.,...e:..~ M. rwriA:no aecictanr' fnr maim rnrtairc and ~~ _ _ _ improvemenu~ The minor home repairs undertaken by tite Oldtimer's Foundation aze greatly appreciated by the persons receiving them. However, the repairs, which average S35 per visit, would not accomplish any of the neighborhood prexrvation goals described above. 2. SnnL~est CySCBmnn F r c a. Description of Activity: The Commtmity Services Department has requested that staff of the CDBG program investigate We possibility of using CDBG funds to assist the development of additloml recreational facilities in the Southwest Cucamonga area. L`ue is ih2 iLCiusivn of u0II-IGwei incam@ a:EaL '.n SItC one-mile xrvice area of park facilities, the development of park facilities in this area does not gttslity at an eligible CDBG activity baxd upon the goal of providing improvemenu to lower-inrnme areas. However, CDBG program staff is Preliminary Statement of Objectives ~ ~~ -S- prepared to pursue receiving U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) approval of such a project, based on the need to provide recreadonal facilities as part of an overall strategy to support public facilities necessary to prevent conditions which may lead to neighborhood blight. b. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the[ the City Council direct CDl3G program staff to work with HUD to attempt to qualify the Southwest Cucamonga azea as an eligible tazget azea for improving and developing recreatioml facilities as llmi of au uvc2au sva[egy [O suppOR pnbllC I8Cd1nC5 necessary to prevent condidons which may lead m neighborhood blight. Preliminary Statement of Objecdvea / ~ ~ -9- A, NF7('rHBO HOOD P ECERVATION t. tfo~+~ip¢ Rehab~cpuon Pro~am Description: There aze three proposed rnmponents to the Housing Rehabilitation Program: a. and LOWIIItereSt lAa.^. Program wO.ild prfNldE amortised low-interest loans of up to 520,000 to owners of single-family residences occupied by lower-income persons. b. The Deferred Loan Program would provide non- amortised loans of up to SI5,000 to senior citizen, households headed by handicapped persons and very-low incoma families who are oxmer-occupants of singlatamity residences. The loans would be due and payable upon sale of the home. c. The Home Rehabilitation Grant Program would provide grants of up to 55,000 to lower-income owner-occupants of siogle-family residences. Location: All programs would be available city-wide. Eligibility: This project is eligible under Section 570.202 of the CDBG regulation. Benefit: All loan and grants would be used for the rehabilitation of residences oavpied by lower-income households. Project Funding; 580,000 2. Historic Preservation Incentives Description Historic Preservation grants and loan would be provided to owners of historic properties for the Prelimittary Statement of Objectives ~~ -10- elimination of conditions detrimental to public health and safety as defined by local codes and health ordinaaws. Location: The program would be offered city-wide. Eligibility: Tnis prvjed is cl:yble ~nGt: ~.- ~~n 57^?0-' ^f the CDBG regulations. Benefit: All loans and grants would be used for the elimination of conditions detrimental to public health and safety, in order, to meet the eligibility criteria of preventing or eliminating spot blight. Project Funding: 520,100 B, cnrm~rvt>FCr CUCA~fpNGA STREET tMPROVEMENTS Description: This project iwolves the design and construction of streets, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks for specific streets in the Southwest Cucamonga neighborhood. Location: The project will be undertaken at the following locations: 1. Construction of Improvemenu for Vinmar Avenue, north of Salina Avenue and Selina Avenue, from Calaveras Avenue to Sierra Madre Avenue. 2. Design of Improvements for Vinmar Avenue, from Ninth Street to Chaffee Street. 3. Desi~ of Lmprovements for Sierra Madre Avenue, from Ninth Street to Chaffee Street. 4. Construction of hnprovemenu for Calaveras Avenue, from Arrow Highway to Ninth Street. Eligibility: This project is eligible under Section 570201(c) of the CDBG reguia+io~~. Benefit: The streeu to be improved are located in an area 51 percent or more of whose residents are lower income. Project Funding: 5210,000 Preliminary Statement of Objectives ' -11- C, SENIOR AR FD HO IN . Description: This projeM is a continuation of a public setvitt program to provide a matching urritt for thou who wish to shaze their homes with unior citium in need of housing az a means to increau housing choices and promote :aaependcat lir•:ry- a.uuu~ lirwcr-incume senior ©uuns. Location: This program would be available city-wide. Eligibility: This Droiect is eligible under Section 570.201(e) of the CDBG regulations. Benefit: The services will be provided to lower-income senior citizens. Project Funding: 56,300 D. ar)MINISTR_ATI ON Description: This program will provide for continuing the administration of the CDBG program, including activities [o coordinate the implementation of the CDB(`, program with the (,Pty's other community development and planning activities. This project also includes the Fair Hossing Program and the landlord/Tenant Mediation Program. location: This program would provide for the administration of the CDBG program city-wide. Eligibility: This project is eligible under Section 570.206 of the CDBG regulations. Benefit: This program provides for benefits to the persons and neighborhoods to be carved by the above-0escribed programs. Project Funding: CDBfi Program Administration 577,805 Fair Hotuing Program S 4,333 Landlord/Tettent Mediation ; 4.462 Total 586,600 Preliminary Statement of Objectives ~ -3 -lz- finder federal Executive Order, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is required to protect floodplains and to reduce the risk of losses from floods by not conducting, supporting, ~; a;.jp~--- +.»:.~H.~ en ra4.. nlac' in FlmAnlaise ~tnl~cc fhe aMivides ConStimte the ...e ..__..___ __ _ only practical alternatives to meeting community needs. Although most of the water courses in the City have been channeled to reduce Hood hazards, there aze some aeeas which are potentially subject to flooding in a 100-yeaz flood. As indicated on the map attached as Figure 1, several of the proposed activities aze to be undertakes in floodplain areas at risk fora 100.yeaz flood These activities aze designed to alleviate the deterioration of public and private property already located in the floodplain. Therefore, these activities do not dvectly or indirectly support development within the floodplain. Staff of the Planning Division of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has assessed the long- and short-term risks of undertaking the activities within the floodplains, and has assessed mitigation measures which may be included in the design of the activities. Public notice of the intention to undertake activities within the floodphtin was published in the local newspaper to provide citiutts the opportunity to comment upon the activities. Notices were alto provided to interested public agencies. SOUTHWEST ~UCAMONGA STREET IMPROVEMENTS Staff considered in previous years alternatives to providing public umprovements m areas of Southwest Cltcamonga located in identified flood hazard zones. Ali sweet improvements proposed for funding through the 1990.91 Commonly Development Block Grant (CDBG) have previously been reviewed and approved by the City Council. The Council has previously made a finding that the sweet improvement activities which are proposed for the 1990.91 CDBG program are the most practical and desirable alumatives, and that adequate mitigation measures Gave been identified aced designed into the projects. The desigq location, and size of the projects have not changed subsequent m the finding. Therefore, no new finding is required Preliminary Statement 1 of Objectives ~ J S -13- The Council has also made a previous finding that the Housing Rehabilitation Program and Historic Preservation Incentives Program are the most practical and desirable alurnatives, and that adequate mitigation measures have been identified and designed into the projects. However, addigq additional funding to these nn¢nino programs requires a new finding. Staff considered alternatives to undertaking these activities in the floodplain aeeas and found them impractical and undesirable. One alternative would be to exclude properties in these areas from the programs. This would leave residences in these areas which are occupied by lower-income persons u~rrotected from the deterioration which may otherwise result from the deferred mainunana likely to occur where financial assistance for borne improvements is unavailable. Excluding historic properties from the program would similarly fail to protect such properties. The other alternative, removing the structures from the floodplain, is cleazty impractical. In order to mitigate flood hazard impacts for structures which are to be rehabilitated under these programs, the City may require that owners of properties located in flood hazard areas show evidence of federal flood insurance coverage before rehabilitation assistance is provided. In order to approve operating the Housing Rehabilitation Program and Historic Preservation Incentives Program within the floodplain the Ciry Council must find that: It is necessary to undertake We activities in the floodplain in order to protect rosidences oavpied bylower-income persons and historic properties from the deteriorationwhichmay otherwise reaultfrom the deferred maintenance likely to'vccur where financial assistance for repairs and improvements is unavailable. 2. Adequate measttrq designed to mitigate the risk of property loss which may rmnlt from undertaking the activities Gave been identified and included in the operative of the activities. 3. The activities conform to applicable state and regional floodplain mamgement standards. Preliminary Statement of Objectives ~.~~ -14- ®~oo rug noon ~ouwoer CITY OF RANCHO C[JCAMONGA Pl.d-NNING gV1S10N ~ 37 V V NORTFI rte, ~, Flood Channsl FIGURE: ~ SCALE+ NOn~ A CTfT7.FN. ' ppRTICIPATION P AN tee t.7ry of Rancho Cucamonga encourages gad solicits We participadon of its residents in the process of identifying projects for funding through the Community Developmene Black Grant (CD13G) Program. The Ciry will, in conducria¢ the CDSG Program, follow this Citizens' Participation Plan. Ctiveaeb, The City of Rancho Gltramonga encourages citizen participation; with a particular emphasis on participation by persons of low- and moderate-income and residents of neighborhoods which aze experiencing physical deterioration Ia order to reach as many residents and community groups as possible, letters will be sent to community organuatioas and individuals who have participated is the program or suggested projects in recent years. In additioq a display advertisement will be published in the Daily Report at react a month prior to consideration of the preliminary statement. 2. Notia• The Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga provides citiuac with advanced notice of all meetings related to the CDBG program and makes copies of all related materials available for public review as soon as notice is given. Notix of the hearing on the Preliminary Statement of Community Development Objectives will be published in rA• Tlaily R~nnre ar l~xct 1f1 daw prior m the hearing. 3. Technical Assistance. The City will publish the names and telephone numbers of staff familiar with the CD13G program who are available to answer questions and help residents and community groups package a proposal. 4. glpjj~ypygg, The City of Rancho Cucamonga uses public hearings to obtain dtiuns' views and to respond to proposals and questions at all stages of the program, A hearing is field on the Preliminary Statement of Community Development Objectives at which the City's housing and community development Heads are reviewed, past policies and programs are discussed, and each proposed project is explained. A preliminary sale.-ticn of obje.^tives and pro,^-asp it rhea made and published for public review and cornmeal The hearing on the final grant appticadon is Geld a month later. All hearings are duly noticed. Preliminary Statement of Objectives ' ~ -tfr Agendas and staff reports are available in advance. The meetings aze held in the Lion s Cenur, whicb is fully accessible to the handicapped. 5, i nn~,,~„n.~.Y«±t,+1iw, Severs! neighborhoods 4ave substantial 4ispanic populations. At meetings where it u likely that the attendees wdl not be bilingual, iue ~.;Cy r.':.' p:o::de ~ i**.Lrp*iter m ensure that residents can understand and participate in the procedures. 6. Resnortsiveness. Once projects Gave been funded and are under way, the City is xmmitttd to ensuring the satisfactory execution of each project. Staff prervides a timely response to all written complaints, usually within 15 working days. B. RFitX~ATION PO ICY Recent changes in the regulations gmerning the expenditure of CDBG funds requve that the City establish a polity governing the provision of relocation assistance to any family, individual, business, non-profit organization or farm that results from implementation of its CDBG progratps. It is the polity of the City to avoid displacement of all families, individuals, businesses, non- profit organization and farms ip carrying out its CDBG programs. No displacement is espected to result from the activities proposed for the 199491 program year. However, in the event Urat operation of any of the CDBG funded activities results in the voltmtary or imoltmtary displacement of amt Family in~liviAnA1 Micin.•ac nnn-nmfit nrganization or farm (whether owner or renur) the City will provide relocation assistance in acxrdance with the standards and guidelines set forth in the federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act, Section 7260 (et seq.) of the State of California t:rovernment Code (Title 25, Chapter 6) and the guidelines issued by the State of California -epartment of Housing and Community Development, as applicable. The City will meet its relocation responsibilities through the ttse of its staff and xnsultanu, supplemented by assistance from local realtors, sadal agentaes, and civic organizations. It is the CYry's objective that all displaces be relocated with a minimum of hardship in aocommodatiops which are decent, safe, sanitary, and suitable to their individual steeds; located in areas not less desirable than their current =oa8on ti regard m pubic ut:lfties and public and xmmerciai fariiides; and reasonably aceessible to Ureic customers or places of employment and priced within their financial meson. Prelimitrary Statement of Objectives ' 3~' -17- The City will handle thou cases requiring relocation which result from implementation of CDBG activities oa an individual case-bycau manner. Services provided to eligible displaces shall indude but not be limited to: • Providing information oa project activities, rights, benefits, and options ooen to them • Maintaining liaison between displacees and agencies of firms with resources to assist them (e.g, Chamber of Commerce, Small Business A~r++-si_<t*ation. ~rc of L~ Emnemle D!vPlepmenr, Icndina institutions, real[ors, etc.). • Locating, inspecting, evaluating, or stimulating the production of accommodations !o mx: the seeds of a1 disp!axes. • Assisting displacees in obtaining financing Assisthtg displacees in securing priority coasideradon for rental assistance, public housing, or other housing assistance activities. • Malting referrals to appropriate social, community, and welfare agencies. • Keeping records, maintaining files, and coordinating all relocation activities. • Providing all families, individuals, businesses, institutions, and farms which are displaced by CDBG funded activities with written notice of this policy, the types of utvices available to them, and the amount of relocation assistance for which they may be eligible. (Payments will be in the amounts established by state and federal guidelines) City staff and consultants will be available to answer questions and provide information, and, by then eazly involvement, to see that relocation proceeds with a minimum of hardship. C, RFCmF~At anrn-nf~>'I_s[~MENT PLex Section iod of the Housing sad Community Dcelopaent :,ct of l9';4 requires each grantee to adopt, tnalce public, and certify that it is following a residential anti-displaameat plan providing one•forone replacement units in cases where residential units are demolished as a consequence of as activity funded through the CDBG program. The plm must include steps that will be Preliminary Statement of Objectives ' ~ Q •18- taken to .~;r,im++~ the displacement of persons from their homes ruulting from anY activity funded under the CDBG program. It is ant anticipated that any demolition of rsidential strucnues will occur as a result of any of the activities proposed to be undertaken during the 1990-91 program year. riwiera, ;:. acx.:'..a.-cc •.:^•W •W: '~ *.he f'~ty of Rancho Cucamonga establishes this Residential And-Displacement Plan. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will replace all occupied and vacant occupiable lower-income dwelling units demolished or rnnverted to a use other than as tower-income housing as a direct result of activities assisted with funds provided under tnc iiuusing and Communiry Development Act of 19'74, as amended, as described in 24 CFR 570.G06(b)(1). 2. All replacement housing will be provided within three years of the mmmenament of the demolition or rehabilitation relatigq to rnnversioa 3. Before obligating or expendmg fonds that will directly result in such demolition or rnnversion, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will make public and submit to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development the following information in writing: a A description of the proposed activity. b. The general location on a map and the apprmdmate number of dwelling units by number of bedrooms that will be demolished or converted to a use other than as lower-income housing as a direct result of the proposed activity. c. A time schedWe for the commencement and completion of the demolition or conversion. d The general loation on a map and appro~dmate number of dwelling units by camber of bedrooms that will be provided as replacement dwelling units. e. ?lse souax of fundieg and a time xhedu!e Ear tHC fimvi56~a of replacement dwelling traits. Preliminary Statement of Objectives ~ ~ f -19- The basis for wncluding that each replacement dwelling unit will remain a loweo-income dwelling unit for at least 10 years from the date of initial occupanry. D. CRt'[EIZtA FOR c rKt' nmat. Cr-tetJ .°;.dcrsl rgulatioas for the CD9G pro~°,.s •ey,:.... •~e City t cn.tj' -„ucred citizeas and provide them the opportunity to comment on any propoxd activity which is added, deleud. or substantially changed in terms of purpox, scope, location, or benefiaaries following the submission of the Final Statement of Community Development Objectives and Proiected Ux of tunas to me u.~, uepartment of Housing and Urban Development The regulations require the City to adopt and make public iu definition of "substantial change." The Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga shall consider a "substantial change" to have occurred under the foLLowirtg circumstances: 1. The amount to be allocated to air activity is proposed to be increased or decreaxd from the amount in the Final Statement by more than 25 percent 2. The loartion of the activity, or the target area of eligibility criteria of the program, is changed from that describad in the Final Statement 3. An activity not included in the Final Statement is propoxd for funding. 4. M activity included in the Final Statement is propoxd for elimination or cessadoa Should the City Council consider a substantial change is any CD13G funded actirry, the public will be notiSed and provided an opportunity to comment upon the propoxd change. Preliminary Statement of Objectives '~~ •?A. a In accordance with the Housing and Community Ihvelnnmenr AM of lo7a, as amended, and with 24 CFR 570.303 of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) regulation, the City of Rancho Cucamonga certi5es that: 1. It possesses legal authority to make a grant submission and to execute a mmmtmtty development and honing program The City Council has duly adopted a resolndon authorizing tha Mayor to submit the fatal statement and amendments, thereto, and all understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing and authorizing the Mayor to act in connection with the submission of the final statement and to provide such additioml information as may be required. 3. Prior to submission of its final statement to HUD, it has: Met the citizen participation requirements of 4570.301(b). b. Prepared its final statement of community development objectives and projected use of funds in accordance with 6570.301(c) and made the final statement available to the public. It is following a detailed citizen participation plan which: a. Providas for and encourages citizen participation, with particular emphasis on participation by person of low- and moderate-income who are residents of slum and blighted areas and of areas in which Eunds are proposed to be used and provides for partiapadon of residents in tow- and moderate- iawme neighborhoods as defined by the City. b. Provides citizens with reasonable and timely access to local maati~g, infnrmatido, and rec+±rds relating to rite grantee's proposed use of funds, at required by the regulation of the Secretary of HUD, and relating to the actual use of funds under the Act. Preliminary Statement of Objectives '~3 -21- c. Provides for uehnical assistance to groups representative of persons of low- and moderate-income that request such assistance in developing proposals with the level and type of assistan« to be determined by the grantee. d. Provides for public hearings to obtazn ttt~zen views and to respond to proposals and questions at all stages of the community development program, including at least the development of seeds, the review of proposed activities, and review of program performance, which hearings shat! be held after adequate notice, at times ana tocanoas convoaicui co potential or actual benefiaaries, and with accommodation for the handicapped e. Provides for a timely written answer to written complaints and grievances, within 15 woeldng days where practicable. f. Identifies bow the needs of non-English speaking residents will be met in the case of public hearings where a significant number of non-English speaking residents can be reasonably expected to participate. 5. The grant will be conducted and administered in compliance with: a. Titre VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law gg•352, 42 U.S.C. A2000d et ua•)• b. The Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601-20). 6. It will a~rmadvely further fair housirtg. 7. It has developed its final statement of projected use of funds so as to give ma~dmum feasible priority to activities which benefit low- and moderau- income families or aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; (the final statement of projected use of funds may also laclude activities which the grantee certifies are designed to meet other community development needs having a particular [agency because etdating conditions pose a carious and immediate threat to the health or wtlfate of the community aer! piper financial resources are not available); except that the aggregau use of 1;D13G fttnds received under section 106 of the Act, and if applicable, under section 108 of the Act, during the 1990.91 through 1942.93 program years, shall ptiacipally benefit persons of Itrw- and moderau•income in a manner Preliminary Statement of Objectives ' ~ -22- that ensures that not less than 60 percent of such ftmds are used for activities that benefit such petsovs during such period. 8. It has developed a rnmmunity development plan, for the period specified in paragraph 7 above, that identifies community development and housing aeeus sud specifies both short end tong urm community development objectives that have been developed in accordance with the primacy objective and requirements of the Act. 9. It is followittg a current housing assistance plan which has been approved by HLJD. 10. It will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvemenu assisted in whole or in part with funds provided under Section 106 of the Act or witit amounts resulting from a gttatantee under Section 108 of the Act by assessing any amount against properties owned and occupied by persons of low- and maderau-income, including an}r foe charged or assessments made as a condition of obtaining access to such public improvements, unless: a. funds received under Section 106 of the Act are used to pay the proportion of such fee or assessment that relates to the capita! crosu of such public improvements thm are financed from revenue sources other than under Titie l of the Act; or b, far purposes of assessing any amount against properties owned and occupied by persons of moderau income, the grantee certifies to the Secretary that it lacks sufficient funds received under Section 106 of the Act to comply with the requirements of subparagraph (a) above. 11. Its notification, inspection, testing, and abatement procedures concerning lead-based paint will comply with 4570.608. 12. [t will wmply with the acquisition and relocation «gttirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 as required tinder 4570.606(a) and federal implementing regulatioffi; the requirements in 4570.606(b) governing residential aati- displarement and relocation nc<,cr=++~ plan under Section 104fd) of the Act (including a certification that the grantee is following such a plan); the relocation requirements of 4570.606(c) gweccting Preliminary Statement c of Objectives I ~J -23- displacement subject to section 104(k) of the Act; and the rolocadon requirements of $570.606(d) governing optional relocation assistance under Section 105(a)(11) of the Act. 13. It will comply with the other provisions of the Act and with other applicable taws. B. CERTIFICATION REGARDING ADRUG-FREE WORKPLACE The Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga certifies that it will provide adrug-free workplace [ry: 1. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufachue, distributioq dispensing, possession or use of a wntrolled substance is prohibited is the grantee's workplace and specitying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition. 2. Establishing a drug•free awareness program to inform employees about: a. The dangers of drug abase in the workplace. b. The City's polity of maintaining adrug-free workplace, a Any available drug counselling, rehabilitadoq and employee assurance programs. d. The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violadoas occurring in the workplace. 3. Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph 1. 4. Notityiag the employee in the statement required by paragraph 1 tha; u a coadidon of employment under the gran; the employes will: a abide by the Berms of the statemem; and b. notify the employer of a~ criminal drug statute conviction for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five days after such conviction. Preliminary Smtement of Objectives I ~ (~ •24- 5. Notifying the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development within ten days after receiving notice under subparagraph (4)(b) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such comictioa 6. Taking one of the following actions, within 30 days of receiving notice under subparagraph (4'~(b), with respect to any employee who is so convicted: a. Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, un to and including termination. b. Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilimtion program approved for such ptuposG. by a fadaz,.1, state, oz !ocsl hea!!h, !aw eafozcemea~ or other appropriate agency. Maldag a good faith effort to contimta to maintain adrug-free workplace through implementation of paragraphs Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. ['reliatittary Statement ,r of Objectives ~ '} 7 .25- PIACE OF PERFORMANCE FOR CERTIFICATION REGARDING DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS Name of Grantee: The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Grant Program Name: Community Development Block Grant Program Grant N•.unber: B-90-MC-06.0556 Date: April 18, 1990 Place of Performance: Rancho Cucamonga City Hall 9320 Base I~ne Road and 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730 Preliminary Statement of Objectives I ~ -26- G CERTIFICATION PROHIBITING THE USE OF EXCESSIVE FORCE In accordance with Section 519 of Public Law 101-140, the 1990 HI1D Appropriations Act, The City of Rancho Cucamonga certifies that it has adopted and is enforcing a policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law eufOrtiSiut ajjcuue5 wwfn ft5 jaiiSdi~uua a~aiu5i nay IadlvldU815 ingagid in nonviolent civil rights demonstrations. D. CERTIFICATION REGARDING LABBYING Ibe undersigned cerdn"es, to rite best of his Imowledge and belief, that 1. No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned to ary person for i~luenang or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agenry, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or as employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of atry federal contract, the malting of any federal gran; the malriog of any federal loan, the entering into of a~ cooperative agreemen; and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment or modification of any federal contras; gran; loan, or inoperative agreement. 2. If any funds other than federal appropriated foods have been paid or will be paid to a~ person for influencing or attemptng to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, as officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this federal contract, gran; long or cooperative agreemem, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form- I.LI, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions. 3. The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for aU subawards at all tiers (fnduding subcontracts, subgrants, and inntracta under grant, loans, and cooperative agreemenu) and that all subreapieMS shall certify and disclose accordingly. Signed: Denis G Stout Mayor Date Preliminary Statement I of Objectives -27- DATE: March 21, 1990 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer 8Y: John L. Martin, Associate Civil Engineer ;L^4~ fi,+ SuBJELT: Public Nearing of protests regarding Eminent Domain action to acquire public right-of-way for the Base Line Road Widening, Parcel Map 11838 Project between Victoria Park Lane and Rochester Avenue at the properties located at 12428 and 12472 Base Line Road (APN 227-091-14 and 15) for the construction of street improvements across the frontage of said properties. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the attached Resolution of Necessity - directing staff to proceed with condemnation of right-of-way far the construction of street improvements for the Base Line Road Nldening Parcel Map 11838 between Victoria Park Lane and Rochester Avenue at the properties located at 12428 and 12412 Base Line Road (APN 227-091-14 and 15) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACK(3t0UMD/ANALYSIS This item was continued from the March 7, 1990, Council Meeting. ihts is an Eminent Domain action to acquire street rights-of-way for Base Line Road west of Victoria Park Lane adjacent to a recently approved shopping center and Parcel Map No. 11838. This action is being pursued as required by the Rgreement entered into between the City and Hughes Inver Lnents. The time limit of 120 days from date of filing of the map, to acquire this right-of-way, is set by the State Subdivision Map Act and 1s due to expire on Apr11 8, 1990. Therefore this action is brought before the City Council for consideration. It will need to be adopted should Council desire to enforce the condition of approval placed on the parcel Map subdivision to construct offsite Improvements, not adjacent to the subdivided property. The owner of the parcels, Ms. Edna Eilena, has been courteous, but has declined to accept the monetary "offer of ,just compensation" made by the City, as established by an independent appraiser. Aiiirough negotiations continue, it 1s deemed necessary at this time to enact a Resolution of Necessity to proceed with condemnation of such right-of-way for the proposed development, prior to expiration of the State mandated time period for acqu1s1t1on. Respect s ed, t Attachment / RESOLUTION ND. q~-~o9 A RE50.UTION ff TIE CITY COUNCIL ff THE CITY ff RANCHO CUCANOM6A OECLARIM6 TIE PUBLIC NEED AMD NECESSITY TO CONOEIN A PORTION ff CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOGITED 1N TIE CITY ff RANCHO CUCAMD11611 AND NAKIM6 FIMDIN6S IM SUPPORT TNEREff. A. Recitals. (1) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has eonducted a study pertaining to the widening, realignment, constructton and improvement of Base Line Road between Victoria Park Lane and Rochester Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred Lo as the "protect"). Based upon such analysis, tt has been determined that the most reasonable and feasible plan for widening, realignment, construction and improvement of Base Line Road will require the acquisition of a portion of that certain real property commoniy known by the street addresses of 12429 and 12472 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, Cal tfornl a, and more Darti col ariy described to the attached Exhibit "A". (ti) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 40404(a), a City ~~~ay "~yu;,c yii""ie pr~perLy uy cunaennacion wean is is necessary tOr establishing, laying out, extending and widening streets; (iii) Pursuant to the provisions of California Goverr~cnt Code Section 7267.2, prior to adopting this resolution the City has made an offer to the owner of record to acquire Lhe property for the full amount of fair market value as established by an independent appraisal valuation; 11v) On March 21, 1990, this Council held a duly noticed hearing pursuant to the teens of California Code of C1v11 Procedure Sec tipn 1245.234 and said hearing was concluded prior to the adoption of this Resolution; and, (v) All legal prerequisites have occurred prior Lo the adoption of this Resolution. B. Resolution. -1- /5l 8. Resolutlan. NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Councti of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: Sv'TLr.. I. in 411 ..~c ,~- get s~.th /~ fM p~ri cal c, part A. Of this Resolution. SECTIGM 2: That the real property which is required for the street .. ~rc.~.ent purpos25 referenced herein is situated 1n the Gi ty of Rancho Cucanpnga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is more specifically outlined in 4he legal description and map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" an6 incorporated herein by this reference. SECIIBN 3: Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council durtng the above-referenced public heartng, including written and oral staff reports, the City Council specifically finds as follows: a. The public interest and necessity require the proposed proiect; b. The proposed prglect is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private 1nlury: c. The property defined to this Resolution is necessary for the proposed protect; and, d. An offer of fair market value hss been made to the owners of sold real property pursuant to the Lena of California Government Code Section 7267.2. SEClIdI 4: The Ctty Councti hereby declares its intention to acquire the property deserl6ed 1n Section 2, above, by proxedings to eminent doraaln. The City Attorney is ordered and directed to bring an action in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Bernardino, in the nsae of the City of Rancho Cucamange, against all owners and elaiaNnts of the property described herein for tM purpose of conda+aning for stnei iRprovaalant C-2- / Jd' determination in accordance with the provisions of law applicable thereto. The City Attorney is authorized and instructed to make applications to said Court for an Order fixing the amount of security by way of money deposits as may be directed by said Court and for an Order permitting the City to take possession and use of said real property for the uses and purposed herein described. SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED and ADOPTED th15 21st day of March, 1990, yor I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City oP Rancho Cucamonga held on the 21st day of March, 1990, and was finaily passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 21st day of March, 1990, by the following vote: RYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: AV G: WYIIULL I'CrOLM1O. ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL hEMBERS: ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga -3- ~s3 E%IltdtT -n• E%HIBIT A-1 LECAL OESCRI CT ION OF CARCEL "A" (STREET CASEMENT) Ali chnc Land in che Clay of Rancho Cucamonga, County °C Sun 6ernardino, S mce °F Ca life rn ia, within chat pore Lan of Lacs 30, 71 and J2 of Orange Empire do res as shown by map on file Ln dook 20 of Maps, ac page 1, Recortls of San Be [Ward loo County, CalLfornta and Wore particularly deacr Lbed as follows; PARC F.I. "A" (STREET EAS Fl1E,NT) deg inning ac a po inc on the Eesc Llne of sa ld Loc 12 which bears N. 00° OS' 07" ~ _ ,.r ;n nn foes from che Souchesse corner of sold Lot 72 said pains alsoAhein g^che Northeaac corner of chat certain pnreel conveyed co che Councv of San derna rdino by deed recorded Noveeber 25, 1977 in 0aok 922, page 206 of OfFic Sal Rae ords, Records of San Bernardino County, Callfornla; 1'henca N. 00° OS' O7" r ., along Bald East line a dlstance of 117,89 fee c; Thence N. 89° 54' S7" U., q dis canes of 7.00 feat; Thence S. 00° OS' 07• D., a distance of 70,00 fee c; Thence Sauchves terly on a tangent curve concave co the Nor[hveac having a rod lus of 24.00 fee c, through an angle of 97° 27' 4$^, an arc length of J9.15 feet co a polo[ of reverse curve coca; Shence Descerly on a curve concave co che South having a radius of 1840,00 fee c, through an angle of 00° JS' 27•, an ere length of ]0.00 feat (the tnttlal radial line bears N. O7° J2' 32" E.); Thence 3. >4° 56' 40" 4.. a dls ranee of 9J.22 fact; Thence S. 00° 10' l7• E., a distance of 12.00 feet; Tha nee S. 97° 57' 10' 4., a dlstance of 241.70 feet Co a polo[ on che North line of said parcel conveyed to the County of San Bernardino; Thence N. 89° 49. 2J• E., along as ld North line a dls tnne• of 789.42 feet co che pa Lnc of begtnning. Con Gains: 10914 SF or 0.25 ncrea De se cipclon prepend under rho supatvialan of: Dllltan N. Addtngcon 3. 7821 Daca for J.F. Davtdaan Aaaoclatu, Inc. WISIIAN N. ADOINOfON Oaf s~~ ~2, r i ~u , ~ o Iw„ s a ~~i --->^ j., ~TIWANDA GOLCNY LANDS ~~ ~. 6L;,CK J 13 .+ez~ra ';~; ~. ~.u-nx<oo sa'.o ~-'-~~iR~- 3 ACCEY ~uan2n __-rav e..r `,~ ~/' ' ~ 2 ' xo1,,_u• ~. j Y 1 m> ~ I li ~p ~ • '~~ n ~ ~: i~ m ~~ V~ 2l5 V q h ~ Wi I n-ie6a ro'a•aY13'Zr [-3a m' ROh ~ 88 m L. t ~ cY ~ ' Q I dog u J' ~ kin ~ e i ect~ i ~~ti ne eo~i Y n I a 't~~ {i n I U~T4 'o° i W I ~~"+Gt;i ,o 0 2 ' ~ ~ '~~ e ~ vl~ ~ hl ~, ~' J t0 ~o tpR` ~~ rI1lWMM `~~ MOYCION # yiJo 124 x>:.::.,~~t~YF.iAECw:En xi SU/tnvrvauu' :$ !@. l±tl ~:'v I {?'n~Cµ 0 1 ~ < 3 a. - ora /LVl l / LNY/0.9M,.I930.19r1S. IYC E)!/I/B/ "i1 " C/TY Of FJAA/Cf/O CUCAMONGA r~u n.r rt rant xr •ra rx ,Dunk nK rwatrtt xsatrenr rxr i/I~p(pq'r{'yx(x/Ir/t xO11NIIp//K IA/rI(M lIf1gIISW ~Nxtw .wrtr1a~ tort r,ao' ax+x {IrtMUrf >Z ~1h2~ ri~wn~f~Yfi1/fiMlM EXHiB[T A-2 EXHIBIT A-3 fxu 2etr •A• LELAL RSOPS PIS OP Oi PARCEL •A• ANO •A• (S L17 PF idYEHENi) All [ lanJ 1 the CI CY e( ? nc lio cut nn°n¢., [au i San Bar vnlno. S Cwu uttc, 111 nrn:e^ °lcbin coat pe rc lan °f Lop ]0. ]l[end l3 °[ Oran ee h'mp[re 4m nap on file In Hook 30 °f Mapr, c pa6e t. Rac °rGa <[ Sa rnardlno Cmn[y, Ca ll (e rn to ens Warn pn rcSw la rlY ae w Abed ea (o1low;m pA nC 61. 'n• IS LOPE EAS EMEN[) Coimene tn6 a a po lne en the Eaac line of uW Loe l1 vhlch burr N. 00° 05. 0]• f a dbunw of 20.00 fuc [row cN souchurt corner of vLd Lac ]T e\d point aL•e beln6 the Narchauc c° u[ that cattalo p.m.l c vu r roar Dove e '^• -- - - :.> " °eWar 33, l9l) In book 922, pa 6e E06 0[ O((LC lal Pa<p[u. Prce[da,o( San 6a[vrtl]no County, Gll[°[nf •; Thonc• N, 00" OS• 0]• E... •leng old Gec lln. • distance e( lll.e9 [u r; ITence N. B9" 54' s]• Y., • dlaprca of 1.00 Gu co • point Mnlrufwr [e Lrred c • Po lot 'A': Throw S. 00" OS' 0)• V., a dl•une• of ]e.00 fuc; Tharrca Souchvu cony ° a canes nc c enuve to the Norchvuc hnving a tae lua of 24.00 Cur, through m mgl• °[ 9]° 31' 45•, an etc lmgch °[ 19.15 toot c • pa tnr a[ r curnmrv; Ttu nce uu urly en ereurn concau eo the South hrving • radio of 1860,00 through • male f OW 55. 21•, an are 6nLM of ]0.00 Euc (cM In lc lal ntl[al line Men H. 0)° ]2' S2' E.); IDenw S, )A" 56. 40• V., a db ~~re of 9].$2 Gat co cha point °[ befit^n mg of eh. par<el eo ba drr<elbad; ihanp s. 00" 10• A• E a dla canc• of 12.00 Eu t; ihuc• 5, A3° Sl' 10• V., a dlr once o[ 2A1.)0 fuc ce • point on cb No[ch t\n of aid pa m •1 c vepd to the County e( An ee rn.relm; aTlu nce 5, e9" 49'°T]• V„ •len6 old North llr • the Gnce °[ 115.]9 [uq Throw N. e]° 5]• 10• E., • ela aoaa °[ ]s)Jl [uc co cM point of Lag/nn,n6. Conuty: ]5)) SF or 0.00 ac n• PnpC PI. 'P• (SLOPE EAS01EN2) eeglnn tn6 ec the NntMe[an une[onetl Polnc •A'; Thence s. 00" os' 0)• v., a air caner at le ,0o Gae; tbenc• southweu cly o • unguc turn <onwve cp cb Norchvuc Mving n radtu a[ ]4,00 fur, cheeuyt a mgb e( 91" 2J' 65•, an are Lngch e[ ]9.15 .uc co • Polnr oL rrvuu eurve[ua; thence Vu cerly en • corn csncrve ce cb daurh hrvln6 • udlu o[ Ie6o,00 [u c, cnrouen m ogle eL 00° 55' I]', m •ro langeh e[ ]0.00 Got (Na lnlcGl udlel Ilu bon N, ol° ]3' SP e. ); Thanca N. 41" ]]• ]3• L., • dlr canoe eL 01,95 Gee eo eb po lot dC be0/rm log. Conulrtr: Loll SP of 0.07 sons De rc rlpclon prapang unG[ the rup rvbton of; ~EC 32,T!~J,R o~~J,SB.M. `~ i'rVAPiGA OLONY LANCS I ;~~ •~~' ' I '• ~ _N ~_ .: ~.vuovr ~aii ,j I rill Z ACCEY Juvnitn 5ecliav..vt ~j, `_ i a \ '/I. i , tipo ~ Z ~ oor, _si.. ~~ j --ca n pOrn~L~L n +t i S i ' ,~~ am~ CUf+I/E C`L/,1/P JAlA a(~~~ kW l~ »-/e6a M'a•M'3l21 c•3e ro' \~ ~\ i~ n • Z>RJ' 1- 93'Uv5' C •OO /5' '~i S.fb'e.5'OJ'F/ 3N M' ~,~ eLCe~ NG LO~/ .,,err S~. ,N,. ;~>~11r~4rrM fQ ~~r~, . ~. ~,; s rw :~zl Y~FOr cs.~r~°c .'rec.-c^^ex•r _..:/Anc!~~Y~YSS~C+YwP.va' /~J~~b/;/ 8s~a+1 !//L~IM/ATNLitI.4 (.9 'Wl/ M2 ,:~'t J ~!M'/~.YM'~vIX'NIC'.!. ANC j ~ ~WW3~ C~ D do! e ea S I, 2Y~ ~ ~~"~ i W ~Zlir 1 ~~~ga h b /Y~~i/~/ NA I/ EXHIBIT A-4 GIYOPHANCHO CUCAMONGA r„ls nAr rs raarwaa /N rornx~rNr NUrrc/r/arairto/N rNt rNrrllw1 ~IIAONUl9tUN[NI e//}.gfAMN/O/IN(NN1I /(N lXIC1MIpN 1NRlM. ,u/r /'. GO__ aw+r. ~israrr 2L1lOD rN.rc1 $GCYCCA4fi~CNI~ _.- -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 21, 1990 / T0: City Council and City Manager Q FPOM; !tusseii ri. riaguire, City Engineer BY: John L. Martin, Associate CT Vii Engineer SUBJLUI: YUDIIC Medring of prole>i5 r2ydru'i ny^ Ea ne.^.t 9L7r."_i.^. arf S nn f~ acquire public right-of-way for Base Line Road, Parcel Map 11838 Protect, between Victoria Park Lane and Rochester Avenue at the properties located at 12504 Base Line Road (APN 227-111-12 and 13) for the construction of street improvements across the frontage of said properties. ~ RELOMMENBATIOM: Staff does not reconnrend adoption of the attached Resolution of Necessity - directing staff to proceed with condemnation of right-of-way for the construction of street improvements for Base Line Road Protect between Victoria Park Lane and Rochester Avenue at the properties located at 12504 Base Ltne Road (APN 227-111-12 and 13) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 9ACKC~t0UND1.4NALYSIS This item was continued from March 7, 1990, Councll Meeting. This is an Eminent Domain ac tl on t0 acquire street ri gnts-or-way tar Base Line Road west of Victoria Park Lane adfacent to a recently approved shopping center and Parcel Map No. 11838. This action is being pursued as required by the Agreement entered into between the City and Hughes investments. The time limit of 120 days from date of filing of the map, to acquire this right-of-way, is set by the State Subdivision Map Act and Ss due to expire on April 8, 1990. Therefore this action was brought before the City Councll far consideration. The owners of the Nabisco parcels, Nabisco Brands Tnc., and 50. Pacific Ra11 Road, have been courteous, and 1n a spirit of cooperation have made a gratis dedication of the deficient street rights-of-way. Therefore, the Eminent Damaln action is unnecessary. Respectful) Dmitted, .~+ M LM'ly ~ -. ~-_ Attachment RESOLDTION No. ~ ~(/O A RESOLUfIOM ff TiE CITY CODICIL ~ TIE CITY OF RANCHO CIIG!lONG11 OECLARIM6 TIE PLSLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOfATED IN TIE CiTT OF RANCHO CUfJ11QNCA AND INKIM6 FlMDINOS DI JulTUii TR,aE„v~. A. Recitals. (i; The City of Rancho Cucamonga has conducted a study per±aining to the widening, realigiment, construction and improvement of Base Line Road between Victoria Park Lane and Rochester Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as the "protect"). Based upon such analysts, it has been determined that the most reasonable and feasible plan for widening, realignment, construction and improvement of Base Ltne Road will require the acquisition of a portion of that certain real property commonly known by the street address of 12504 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and more particularly described in the attached Exhibit "A". (11) Pursuant to Californfa Government Code Section 40404(a), a City may acquire private property by condemnation when 1t 1s necessary for es to blTsht ng, laying out, extending and widening streets; (iii) Pursuant to the provisions of Californfa Government Code Section 7267.2, prior to adopting this resolution the City has made an offer to the owner of record to acquire the property for the full amount of fair market value as established by an independent appraisal valuation; (1 v) On March 21, 1990, this Council held a duly noticed hearing pursuant to the tei~,s of California Code of Civii 'rrocedure Section iz4S.235 and said hearing was concluded prior to the adoption of this Resolution; and, (v) A11 legal preroqutsltes have occurred prior to the adoption of this Resolution. ~~ NON, THEREFORE, 1t 1s hereby found, detenained and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECfIOM 1: In all respects as set forth to the Rect tai s, Part A, of SECfIpI 2: That the real property which 15 required for the street improvement purposes referenced herein 1s situated to the C!ty of Rancho .ruCani,a y"a, Cudniy OT San Bernardino, State Of Cal ifOFnl a, ana 15 more specifically outlined 1n the legal description and map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 3: Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing, lnciuding written and oral staff reports, the City Council specifically finds as follows: a. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; b. The proposed protect is pianned or located 1n the manner that wilt be most caapatlble with the greatest public good and the least private 1n~ury: r Tha n.n n,.ww bfl nnA In hM. ew...l .~a•a .. a. ._______.. e_._ .._ proposed proleci; and, d. An offer of fair market value has been made to the owners of said real property pursuant to the terms of California Government Code Section 7267.2. SECTIBM 4: The City Council hereby declares its intention to acquire the property described 1n Section 2, above, by praaedings to eminent domsin. The Ctty Attorney is ordered and directed to bring an action 1n the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Bernardino, in the name of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, against all owners aM claimants of the property described herein for the purpose of condemning for street improvement purposes, and to do all things necessary to prosecute Bald action to its final /6~ purposes, and to do all things necessary to prosecute said action to its final deter+nlnatton 1n accordance with the provisions of law applicable thereto. The City Attorney is authorized and instructed to make applications La said Court for an Order fixing the mount of security by way of money deposits as may be directed by said Court and for an Order permitting the City to take possession and use of said real property for the uses and purposed herein described. SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED and ADOPTED this 21st day of March, 1990. yor i, DEDRA J. ADAMS, Ctty Clerk of the Ct ty of Rancho Cucamonga do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on Lhe 21st day of March, 1990, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, held on the 21st day of March, 1990, by the following vote: RYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: AB STA INEO: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga M ~3- EXNIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCR2PTION OF PARCEL "A" (STREET EAS EMENi) cXH10IT A-L All chat land In the Cl[y of Rn ncho Cucamonga, Gouncy of Sen Bernard loo, Sca ee of Callfarnla, inch Ln cltac port ion of Loc 17 Ln Black •J" of Eclvonda Colony Lands ns sltoun by map on file In Book 2 of Maps, et page 24, Records of Sen Bernardino Gouncy, Call Eocnle and Wore parclcularly descr lbed as folloua: PARCEI. "A" (STREET EAS EMENi) Comma nc lug ac the South one •quarcer corner of Secclon ]T, Tovnshlp 1 North, Runge 6 4es c, San Be rnardlna Mer id lan ns shown by mop of Trecc No. 12044 on FLle in Book 167 of Maps, ac pages 78 through 8S, Recocda of Sen Becnecdtno Gouncy, CALL Eornle; Thence N. 00° OS' 07" E. along the No rch anA South quarcer section line also being Cittl N¢a t¢ily !!ne oL Cna[ Ce[cain pa ccvi vvureLv.: :.. .:, "..., L,v, nu described in ExhlDlc "C' of deed recorded December 24, 19BT as "InstrumentaNo. 87• 4516 T8, Records of Sen Be rnardlno County, Csllforn Sa, a dta cence of 67.47 Eeet to cite ,nose Nes early corner of Chet cereatn parcel conveyed to the Couney of San Berns re[no and desc r/bed as Pn reel 1 of deed recorded October 27, 1965 Sn Book 6500, page 875 of Off lc lal Recordz, Records of San Be rnardlno County, Gal lEotnia, said corner be lug chn point of beginning of the parcel to be deaeilDed; Thence cancinuing N. 00° OS' 07" E, along Bald North and South quarcer section line also he lug sald.Vescerly lion of parcel conveyed to Nabisco, Snc. o dls cence of 114,I] feet; Thence 5, fl9° 54' S3" E., a distance of 77.00 feet; Thence S. 00° OS'O1" W., a d[stance of 48.]8 feee; Thence Soucheas ce rLy on a tangent curve concave to the Northeast having a cadlus of 24.00 feet, through en angle of BI° O7. 20•, an a[c length of ]4.79 feat co a Folnc of reverse curvature; The nee Ens ce rly on a curve caneeve co the Soueh having a radius of 18 L0.00 Eee c, through nn angle of 00° OL" 46", an are length of 0.96 feet (Chu initial . u mo m • rn" F 1• ro w mint on rho Ees terly Llne of se Sd parcel conve yed•co Nabisco, Inc.; Thence S. 00° OS' 07" W., along sold Eas early line a dls cence of 47.48 feet co a point on the Norther Ly line of Bald parcel conveyed to the County of San Be rna rdlno; Thenc° Bescerly along sold Norche rly Llne on the Soueh having a cadlus of 12]7.00 feee, through length of 55.08 feet to the polo[ of beginning (the S7' 45" E.). Cancalns 4850 SF oc 0,11 aeraa Descr ipclon prepared under cha supe rv lston of: i,JO~ ~~ P•t S-a9 Hllllan N. Adding_c_on L. 3X21 Dace for J.F, Davidson Assoc Laces, Inc. 5r<D lANO Spq` J~ WRIIAM N. gyp AppIX010X ~° [M r~l'=~1 4 e non•oange nt curve concave ca en angle of 02° 77' 74•, an arc initial radial line bears N. 02 N L EXH1BiT A-2 ~~ I SEC. 32,T.IN.,R.6W.,S.B.M. ~j o / 1 `» ~..~ 5d9fOS3E 1 ~ I •"° I k ~ I~h I ET!W.P.NDA COLONY LANDS / `~S~ u ~T j Z/I4 I~~ I M BLOCK J ~'. ~ V ~ r I ~: e ~ ~r `~ -. W / r J 13 . ~ '" ,o "o Nala_e7-e_~~~ o P,4fi CLFL 'i9 "' rn> V' ~~ , 8 o o UOPI7NE/.'C/L/Nf PANL'EC / PfH -7 ~y ~ m LL°f0 HECOHLl°O LYT. 27, /_M' S /~ ~ ~1 CCOH Q-"' FADE 875, o H . S9/ G ar ~. ~ N ~rfnwnor, accri /Y, 4v[/foHN. I_, ' ~-i1 • /13~ cl7' ' s 5 ~ _ Na=3~ of uv/,vG ~L ~ ' ~ L 5 q9 l'~J ~ S~~IPNO Sp~,4 ~ASE nQ P L/NE ~30A0 ~ WILIIAMN. F` ~oolNCron , - ~ ~ ~ ~,~ b-3o-02 vntVl/1~/iLNNEt'CENF.VF ~ ~~ ~ -QUFFi/EN cm. ,rte No. 3821 ~~J ._ ._ __~ ' TEOF CAUF~ - /[iV /7fPAPAEO UNOfA JA'f S%/'E/71//S.CV CUff 1/E DRTA 8 PI.24 CY1' 4'85'0370' C-5479' Z H'/do0 GY1' d•Cb $V'4G' C•O.3G' CESCB/O! P LY' A- W/CC/AM .AD /N~L;JC~L.7.~1/ OBTL ./~~+PyQ~9V~/OSLW A~6+CC/R7E'S, /NG (r /~!'I ~~~/ FF~ p cirY ors fsAiyc~i~ euc~maiv~~ ,j Tnl! %AT lS SCCELT AN A/0 /N (OC'ATIhC THE NRCEL /S/ OESCN/Bf0 /N THE I SNEET ~ OF ~ I 1 aT1aCNED POCUMEA7 /T /S NOTI PINlOF THE WN/T TEN OESFA/PT/ON T/FRf/N. 11 acncE v "a_4.O' C14/IM' er ~y parE ~ /4 /Q9 sue./ecT 57NCE/EA.e°EME.1/r oo/osa4 Nabisco, Inc„ s Nev Jersey Corporation EXHIBIT •A• GAnltlll N-J LECAL DESC0.IP710N OF PARCEL •A" (SLOPE EASEME.4i) All tbnc In nd In [he Clty of Rnnc ho Cuc meonga, Couney of Snn Be rna rd loo, Scn to of Callforn la, klchln ebae pore ion o[ Loc 1] 4c aloek •J• of Eeluanda Colony Londe as shown by map on fLl• !n Book 2 of Mapa, •t page 24, Re Gorda of San Berne rdlno Couney, California and amro partteulatly described as follows: PnR CF.I. "n" (SLOPE FsSF2lENT) ^-°,'="e^c!ng = the Se+c:'~ cne •quu cec co rnec of Seeclon ]2, 1'ovnzhlp 1 North, Range 6 Nes c, San Be rnardlno Merldfen os sl,o°n by nap of Trace No. 12044 on file Ln Book 167 of Meps, ac pages 78 through 89, Recerda of San Bernardino Couney, Callfornla; ?hence N. 00° O$' 07" E. along the North and South quarter section line also I>e ing Che Nes ce rly lino of that certain parcel conveyed to Nab lsco, Inc, and tlescribed in Exhlblt •C" of deed r¢corded December 29, 1987 as Instrument No. 87- 451628, Aeco rds of San Ba rnardlno Cauncy, Callfornla, n dls ca nee of 177,76 Eee t; Thence S. 89° 54' S7• E., . dls cance of 31.00 Feee Co the polo[ o£ begLnning. of ehe parcel Co he dese ribed; Thence 5. 00° OS' 07• N„ a dls cance of 48.78 feet; The nc¢ Southeas ce rly on a tangent curve concave ee [he Northeast hav(ng e radius of 24.00 feet, through an angle oC 87° O]• 20^, sn arc length of ]4.79 Feet co a polo[ of reverse eu rvature; Thence Easterly on a curve concave co the Souch hnvf ng • rod lus o£ 1840.00 fee c, [h rough an angle of 00° O1. 46", nn me length of 0.96 feet (ehe initial radial line bears N. OT° O1' 47• E. ); to a polo[ on the Easterly line of sold parcel conveyed co NaD lsco, Inc.; Thence N, 00° OS' 07" E., along Bald Eas ce rly line • dls fence of 7.27 feet to en angle point Ln sa Ld line; Thence 5, 89° 54' S7• E. continuing slang sold Easca rly line a dls cance of 15.00 feet co an angle polo[ In sold line; Thence Northerly canelnuing along sn ld Easterly line on • non-tangent curve concave co [he Nesc hnving a radius of 1171.01 feet, through en angle of 00° 70• li -, an arc le ngcn or ui. to [set (toe initial radial line Deers S. 89° 54' S]•E,); Thence N. 20° 25. 5G"N„ a dls ranee of 42.79 fee e; Thence N. 89° 54. 57"N., a distance of 15.00 Feee eo the point of beginning. Conca Lns: 1859 SF or 0.04 acres Descrip eion prepared under the suparvis ion of: ti ill, !! fdd!^••^^ S. 78:1 ...a ..e-_.. Eor J F. Davidson Associates, Inc. ' B'141AM N.~ AOOINCION br. G 7 ~No. 3827 , N ~C ,o ~~.ti IY 0 =~ {r ~L i~: ~•' ~/ ~; V Q ~ extitstr a-a L PaACEC CLIV/E/EO70 NAD/SL.'O, /UL ~~~ LL~SC/1/~nJN EdNitl/r ^C•OF LL CO /A. C[.NIY'O lXC. I~ /^D7 NS /N9/ - I/O 0%-•/</GIB, /1~CCH(F OPF/~e/ ~~ tlCM4Y)LL,vO LOU.uJ/, CAUfONN/A. roiNrof.X~AUNJN~ NB.•Yl 33 •N SEC. 32, T.IN., R.6 W., S. B.M. ,~JsW. , ~~Le~- 1, 1 I oAi3CEL NA" ~•5~ ~~ E [-T j~yVMI~LN CVLVIVY LMi~CJ r/~ r/rv BLOCK J n•/ivor' a-m•~ri%2" L • /(x rB' 13 NoJ of ore ~nJ~ V V ~. 1-, Q DI O P.~ASF ~ L/rUE i30yp ~I 5ou/JiGSN°-9U.9AlEH Cd9. -- -- - SEC. X WI{{IAM N wmnclan [,a b-3o•9z 110. d0f 1 C E S [ ' A / P riQ N PA GPA. O CO UNO G A l h' P ~ UP `A / / ~ ~ C V CU~II/E ~L C ///F OATA "" ,~/ ~i.~ J fJ•z.7.m' n-e~a3•zo- c•.~a79' 'FJ~-r~X~~ /G/ g-ZS-f9 A•/d'oOCYI' d'G9'GV'96• C•O•:G' W/LC/q A /NGJ' L.S3dZ/ t15/G (~ NN"OS'07"C 3.23' /P•A9//OSGW AS.~GC'/A71a'S, /NC. EX,~/i®/T ~~q C/TY Of ifANC.S/D C!/CAMONGA/ EN/S AC.ef l5 SIX. £LY dN A/D IN lOCd7/hC T//E PoNCEL IS/ Oft[N/BEO /N 7ME SNff / ` OF L A1IJLNED LR~CUMEN/ /1I5 NOfAPAR7PF 7NE MY7/ITfN OESCN/PJKW 7AfAElN, SCdLE / "~ an• cw~n+v er ~y care ~ /a /Bg s1Je~En raCOPe EAS~ME/Vl dd/05Da ...,...~ ~ .u.. ~ .........~ ...Y.......,. STAFF REPORT BATE: March 21, 1990 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner tl7: 6reii nUr'ner', ASiUC is is riaiibcr SUBJECT: MEDIAN OPENING AND LANDSCAPING WITHIN MEDIANS IN THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to deny a median opening on Church Street between West Elm Rvenue and Spruce Avenue. I, RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council uphold the Planning Commission's decision and deny the applicant's appeal to allow the median opening. This action may be made by minute action. I[, ANALYSIS: Lewis Homes is proposing a median island opening on Church Street between West Elm Avenue and Spruce Street (see Exhibit B-2?. The opening being proposed is to provide access to a proposed condominium project, Tentative Tract 13859. The issue of a median opening has also come to the forefront because Lewis desires to construct Church Street from Haven to Orchard and cannot complete the design plans until this issue is resolved. On February 14, 1990, the Planning Commission reviewed the request and determined that the proposed opening should not 6e permitted. The Commission felt that median openings should be kept to a minimum in order to provide adequate landscaping. Further the Commission directed staff to prepare a policy resolution establishing a minimum median length to ensure adequate landscaping. At their March 14, 1990 meeting, the Commission adopted a specific policy for median construction. The attached Planning Commission Staff report analyzes the request in detail. Resq 11y s eL~ i Rra i R`_ ~/ City Pl~ner ~`-~ BB:BH:sp Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Applicant's Appeal Letter Exhibit "B" - Proposed Median Opening Exhibit "C" - Planning Commission Staff Report of February 14, 1990 Exhibit "D" - Planning Commission Minutes of February 14, 1990 f~~ Lewis Hennes Management Cvrp. 1156 North tdouotain Aveouc / P.O. Boa 670 /Upland, California 91785 714/985-0971 FAX: 714/981-9799 --R C{iE1YGV~ :ma ro~oarcwnnor February 26, 1990 4~NNr~r)tV910M FEB~g 199Q ~~ Ms. Debra Adams, City Clerk ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Church Street Median Breaks -Appeal of Planning Commission Decision. Dear Ms. Adams: At the last Planning Commission meeting, Brad Buller requested direction on the above, and was instructed to prepare a study for the Commission. in the meantime, we wish to appeal to the City Council to allow us to proceed with the design of the section of Church between Spruce and West Elm, including a median break mid-block. As this section will complete Church between Haven and Orchard, we're enxiuus iu proceed, buc are unwilling to co so wnnout exnausang our appeals for a median break for the following reasons: 1. In reliance on the City's verbal commitment, made several years ago, that a break would be allowed at the center of each block, we made certain planning decisions regarding "front door" areas. Two years have gone into designing Tract 13859 with the entry off Church es its main focus, which was intended to mirror the entry to the future high-density project across Church. 2. This block, at just under 1,300 feet, is well over the 1,000 foot guideline we were given a tew years back for allowance of mid block breaks, and is longer than the block east of Milliken, which has a break. 3. It seems a bit inconsistent for the City to deny this break while at the same time requiring that 20% of each median be hardscaped, to conserve water. Why not conserve water and improve traNic Oow as well by allowing this break? 4. The staff report of February 14, to the Planning Commission painted too bleak a picture by indicating that less median area would be left for I W~ / G-Xy/6/T-~ r Ms. Debra Adams Page 2 lanrtgraning an(1 mnrw rrePS would be IOSt, than would in far.1 ha tha case with tha break. Also, those tew trees actually lost' because of the break could be more than made up in the parkway, which is the main focus of the landscape design for Church. We are planning a triple layer of trees in the parkway. Enclosed is our $126.00 check in payment of the appeal tee; please place us on the next available agenda. Cordially, Lewis Homes Management Corp. Do Thom~rl DMT/vs cc: Brad Buller Enclosure ~~ J' ' J~i~ ., . 35n+~a~ ~ {{,,~/ ,~= ~I .. i/ % ~ ~~ % /~C ~t~ /". i ~~ !~ /7 .. •' I I~. ~I 44 I I I!: I I 9 F No~'tt 1~OI" ~o fug y N~ ~.~' r~ FO V SYZ. 1¢-U WY >1- =W 0 ~~ x ~ ~~~ ~I k~ $I j ~ ,~~~- i i i I~W ~~ I! I'~~ ~ ~N !~ U` ~V~ ~ ~ ~I=~ ~ I -~~- I ~ O ~~ ! ! ~! i! ii~ ll .~ v Ti C ~\\ ~', ao \. l I! /~ 1,(/ // i, , ~I i II I zl i 3 01 . ~ ,I 1~ ~''. ...~ ~ E'Hl/d/1'9-~ ,• 'h c; v~~~N~r~ ~,~ Exfi~~/T ~8 - 2„ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT OAi E: February 14, 1990 T0: Chairman and Melrters of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Dlanner BY: Brett Horner, Associate Planner e~3 SUBJECT: MEDIAN OPENINGS AND LANDSCAPING WITHIN MEDIANS IN THE TEfIWf - I. ABSTRACT: Staff is seekt ng direction from the Planning Coaission on me an island designs in Terra Vista with respect to their location and the amount of landscaping that is available when median breaks are allowed. II. BACKGROUND: Lewis Nomes is proposing a median island opening on urc reet beMeen West Elm Avenue and Spruce Street (see Exhibit A-1). The opening being proposed is to provide access to a proposed condominium protect, Tentative Tract 13859. The issue of a median opening has also came to the forefront because Lewis desires to construct Church Street from Haven to Orchard and canna} rnx,r,l ufe •Fn A~~L._ •___ Y' Y'~"+ u'~1,11 41115 ISSUe 15 resolved. (See Exhlblt B.1 Staff hallavae fl,n .n.......~ _.,___ ~.._.____. _ The Church Street/Terra Vista Parkwdy loop is the key circulation element of the Terra Vista Planned Community which organizes access to the interior of the community (see Exhibit E), The Loop parkway is also a kGy component of the landscape design for the planned community: "The Church Street/Terra Yista Parkwey loop will signal to drivers that they are entering a special community. It will provide a unique visual experience for visitors and residents alike with distinctive landscaping treatacntp _ including a raised median planted with trees will be continuous all the wqy around the loop .. For all of these reasons, the loop parkwAy will be a unique road lending identity to ail of Terra Vista, Both functionally and visually, it will tie the entire community together". EXIT/G ir- "c ~/ PLANNING C0IMISSION STAFF REPORT MEDIAN OPENINGS b LANDSCAPING - TERRA VISTA February 14, 1990 Page 2 III. ANALYSIS: A. Landscape Issues: Toe primary issue is wile ther the median provides enoug~i area i•or landscaping. Staff maintains that, in many cases, very little landscape area is left in medians once breaks and left turn pockets of mid-block openings and public street crossings are provided (i.e., Elm Avenue, Spn:ce Avenue, Mil',ike^ Avenue, Orchard Avenue. Doolar Drive, etc.). As Exhibit A-1 depicts, the two median islands have a Length of 140- 150 feet, once the minimum left turn pockets and taper distances are subtracted. This reduces by approximately 250 feet, the available area for planting, particularly tree planting. Staff believes this is contrary to the goals and objectives of the Terra Yista Community Plan. The Church Street median street tree is the Crape Myrtle, which is to be planted approximately one every 20 feet. Based on this spacing, the median opening eliminates about 18 trees and leaves room for approximately 7-10 trees within each median island. Therefore, if the median opening were approved, only 14-20 trees would be planted for this block which is over 1,200 feet long. In addition, some trees may be lost due to sight line clearances for traffic safety at median openings although preliminary studies indicate that perhaps Doty one tree may have to be eliminated within the median closest to Elm Avenue (see Exhibit A). Traffic Issues: A second issue with the proposed median opening s own on x it A-1, is whether the median opening is actually needed. The applicant has indicated (see Exhibit B) that the site on the south side of Church Street may be developed with office uses (although the site's current designation is for High Density Residential Development) and that the median is needed to service the proposed office site. However, the most logical place for the entrance Tnto the office site appears to be off Town Center Drive, the street which parallels Church Street to the south (see Exhibit A-2 ). The City's Traffic Engineering Section has reviewed this particular proposal and has concluded that the opening would not seriously Impact traffic safety. However, they did conclude that the opening was not warranted based on the number of vehicles entering and exiting the properties involved. There appears to be at least two opyortuntties for driveway entrances (including left turn movements) along Tam Center Drive Into the proposed office site. In addition, Tam Center Drive does oat have a median and therefore, would not have problems with having to provide median openings. 7 ~- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPGRT MEDIAN OPENINGS d LANDSCAPING - TERRA VISTA February 14, 1990 Page 3 Further, right turn movements could still be permitted on Church Street even if the median opening was not allowed on Church $tr-c .~. '^lid ^'°dia ,,., fYp, rrh Ct rapt WnI11A alto tanA t? 4onp anA direct office traffic "south of Church Street, away from the residential areas in the interior of the planned community. Staff believes these factors further support the position that the proposed m«'dian opening on Church Street is not warranted. IY. DPT IUNS: In Lne paSL, Lne Ll iy had nui es iaoiiSilC(1 any miu iumm nic~idii length, and median openings were reviewed individually on a project by project basis. Staff notes the following options for the Commission's consideration: 1. Direct staff to prepare a policy resolution which sets forth a minimum distance for length of medians. Staff would recommend a minimum length of approximately 280-320 feet, not including the taper distance; or, 2. Continue to review proposed median openings on a project by project basis through the Technical and Design Review Committee process; or, 3. Direct staff to prepare a policy resolution which sets forth minimum spacing far median island openings on Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway within Terra Ytsta. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider e op ons sted above and direct staff to proceed with the desirable course of action, if any is desired. Staff also recommends that the Planning Commission deternine whether this particular request for a median opening is acceptable. Rasp lly s itted, Bra er City P1 nner BB:BH!jfs AttacMnents: Exhibit "A" - Proposed Median Opening on Church Streat Exhibit "8" - Applicant's Request letter Exhibit "C" -Mena from Deputy City Engineer to City Planner Exhibit "D" - Letter to Applicant from City Planner Exhibit "E" - Exceryt tram Community Plan ~~ i:: ` ~~~ , ~. ~nN ~' /. i/ ;'~~ ii ;.' ~, No~~" 1~6.; 'i ;' a~~ ~~~// a~~dd~ ~{,~/ I 1, II ~~ I .. II ~I i N N~ ~~ f~ O ¢U Wf >~ =W 0 F~ y. __ j _ ~~pp l i Q II IL I~ ~-~ ~1J- y ji+ it ~I'~. 4';i - II ;_ ... y 1~ a;~: ~. ~. ~; ~I 1,--~ ~~~ i I I I~ I ~, ~ ~~ I I` 'A-.__ I i i; it h~ I~ - -.'~' I ~ ~ I L. N ~; '~ i~ i! hJ- _= ;\~ ~7 'a 0 an ~ n~ ¢ l; x z z 1! .a N I! ~i •~ w Ji i' I~ II i I t~ I j 3. ~~i I Ii j, .__ . .. ...\, ~'~ ~7, EX!~/B/r /I' 'I I' 1'I 1 `. 111, 1 1 ViuNlT~ M-~f -~--s 175 EXN~IS/T /t ° 2 Lewis Homes Management Corp. i 156 NaM Momaio Avenue / P.O. Boz 670 /Upland, CaBfyafa 91785 714/985-0971 FAX: 714NB1-9799 December ?~. 19Ro Mr. Brad Huller, Planning Director City of Rancho Guremonga ".C. - S07 RanchoVCUCapronga, CA 91729 Re: Church Street Medians Dear Brad: i ~~ _J s3 Ln6 CINf ~CNO CUCAMON ~ DIVISION ~ VIA MESSENGER As you might imagine, we're anxious co build Church Street from Haven to Orchard, but find ourselves unable to complete the design of the missing link between Wes[ Elm and Elm until the mid-block median break between West Elm and Spruce is set. Paul Rougeau told me a couple of weeks age that he had reviewed the plan and given his reco~endntion on pocket lengths and tapers, and ha thought it was now up Co Planning to review the amount of landscaping ieLC in the median. Please arrange to expedite this process so we can get the plans completed as soon as possible. ~~~~« «L<~1. «L ..Ll...• ..f «L «Ln L..n ~L n_«__n« ..i _C........ n_ L_..•_ T_ -.. _.... .. .. e ~ .. Gel ieve there was some question about allowing one be twaen Wast Elm and Spruce, as an entry into Tract 13859. As we have always understood that ant mid-block break would be appropriate ss long as Che black is over 1,000 feet long, and this one is close Co 1200 feet, I am not sure what the question is, It is also probably worth noting here that we think of the high density apartment site across Church from Tract 13859 as a future office park •• that seems to make sense behind Toan Center and between the business park and office zoning -- which would obviously require a median break on Church, as both the Elm and Spruce frontages are too short Eor entrances. We would appreciate your hurrying this along for us. Cordially, LEWIS HOMES MANAGEMENT CORP. y Donald H. Thompson Authorized Agent DMT:va cc: Russ Maguire, City Engineer I ~ ,^ EXN/e/~ 8 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: JAnuary 18, 1990 T0: Brad Buller, City Planner ~p~~ FkOM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer g-y- SUBJECT: Church Street Median openings - Terra Vista Protect ~~ ~I F $ Z :J !V ,>; ; , This refers to the letter dated December 27, 1989 from Don Thompson of Lewis Homes (copy attached) requesting a median opening on Church Street for Tract 13859. As you are aware, Lhe requirement of the median islands along Terra Vista Parkway and Church Street was based an aesthetic reason. In the past, some members of the Planning Commission raised same concern regarding providing too many median openings, thereby reducing the amount of landscaping on these medians. Russ Naguire and Dan Coleman recall those discussions in Lhe Planning Cammission and DRC meetings. Paul Rougeau reviewed the traffic analysis for the requested median break, a copy attached. He finds, the traffic count is insignificant to warrant any break. However, if the opening is allowed, 1t will not seriously Impact the traffic safety on the street. The question still remains, if the opening is provided, will the remaining portion of the landscaped area within the block meet the expectation of the Commissioners? I would like to leave that judgement up to you. SB:dlw Attachments l77 ~~~r 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUGMONGA January 24, 1990 Mr. Oonald M. Thompson Authorized Agent Lewis Homes Management Corporation 1156 N. Mountain Avenue P.0. Box 670 Upland, CA 91185 ro., oiea m. em~. wo.no <~.,mw,y, c,mome vr~n, vru vau~lul SUBJECT: PROPOSED MEDIAN BREAK ON CHURCH BETNEEN ELM AND SPRUCE Dear Don: i have reviewed your request with the Engineering Division and it is our opinion that the break in the aged ian is not warranted. further, the break wilt decrease the aaaunt of potential median island landscaping. In the past. the reduction of landscaping has been of concern to the Planning Coaaaission. Therefore, it is my recomaw:nda Lion that should Lewis Holaes desire to pursue cros matter runner, coat we set cros ror a rianm ng Laamisston peen ng ulw er Directors Report for a policy determine Lion on med tan breaks within the Terra Vista Community Plan. If it is your wish to pursue this with the Planning Commission, I will place it on the first available Planning Commi ssien Meeting upon receiving your request. Please give me a call when you've made your decision. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLA IVIS Brad r 0 City Pl nner BB/,ifs cc: Russ Nagulre 78 Ca,milmnkn e.wr Willem ). Alrundrr Chnks ). auquel ll coy M,m+.. Denm+ L. Srwr Deborah N. arvwn P+mtb ), WngM l,ck Um, AICP FxHlg/r n ?_n O.am pN,•_'a OILD aC iDN .N~mCmVO La•_Nyqu> -a n .Y;pVI- 3]rc y~GOaaLNjj •'Cm L'au OJ ;N oc vNa'` oL~m ^~ L ~ i oa mvlr 'UU`- ~aa E-°u vE 'T°a -~ O>•-L Nn.« v r C UL"' L C o m E C~ ° 3 s ~= 0o- a y L yN 3 .'~. ~[ m C j V C~> i a ~. C •' r 9 u L y a y iil y N Cf C ]S a~ a •nNN'N Ta 10]LON N a OI~~NC 6C ai u~~. ~h'a ciO mG a T U >~ ~ yU u E ~ ]- d oL'° n~'° ~ o.°.' .. T.?aa ~„ ViL-ia u,la `o .. a -ra cLLC va+ v a v 3 L _ - _R . ~U_LyU mCa~um0 yN~Od]Ad'O L~'= '^~'..°m; m.. Nm Vf >- La L ~L. i:,L ¢ fD u. .O.>UCa3 L O•+]Y U•N > L] ] .. a 0 u. O a ~) a L >. O C L ? L O O L O `~ L n L 10 > r- J 7 L 6 u m V= a' T a m a s U L ~'A '? a C C a y •+ ;] a~~ ~~ 0 a~ O] 3' r N `,"-' Q.- L L L ~ .,~ U L m N m m Y _ C > .. a ]o OLCaa~AN_ o CC~~r.,u amE m~TC V.r I-- t' D u v d L_ O L' a 2 O d C ~_ ° N a =_ .:. ~~ O' N=~ F O R Y a L ., m~InN ~~vn'"ca QED- '°%LCEcL o«~' °u vD~~ L- uu_u~`o"oau. °r vnoC jat°¢w NHS oa>AN~T° H,~ ~. N- t CI y N j. v % u. O a =,~ > a L L O O a u > ,.. m _ a Avg v c., ... q N,C"muLa .L C/ 3 a N CN [~.a.] F.a. N ~~ -~ `_ N` U E= L~ T o E ~ r o o m° m~ L E N ~ m ~ ~ m ~c % °a :° c L' T C.L_ p w 3 m~ c o ~ o L ~ m u u` J L c " L j C m c a a= ~ .. ~~LL.~>.L CC.~ LyW Cu CAW ~aNLpla~ ~Ia EV'n LO°E~ 'CN v c ~-• •_ _- o -y ~~n aic a `E E~-a c~ ,n ]c ~ vi 3 3 .. ~ o] c O N y O r W~ .N. a lO L C O S 0 C` ~ C~ N Y N m H`-._,n mm mDLC .. UNU.-JLga ENO. 1-dU m0..._u. >m a_ JCOa•n Or. U'Oaaa 'OC aL •'TI NOI r „1O"-tJ ~ E E~~ ~cpL'c°'N° ~mou=Dc ° r O -J 0_ r F' ;n O ,L N a O O C N U O C L l-ri ^]] u L vu E .r ~~n mv6 y- Ea~c'~a 3°On°>.=~" b v= env immaU c c- m yoVf y.N'af F ~vuu E ,' u m .. C Q] 3 a ~ ~ v 2 m '" r l N C p~ m L C c a ] NL aED¢a~~, 3 L 3 y C .- C y t0 m : ~A N N "' > -a~ c > C..c oa -..r ]- ]yt ~ e G~ VC o J..v ^ a=% IjmOnO ~ NOy ~'~U3N~ ENV OC-r„NNs n L` U m a ~ U a ~ Y m N L ~ a ~L, ~ q O ; a a° E 2~'O ~] '~'-' N~ V E O N =D F- u d ,n >"a0 J FO- '.:l w° y -', c ~ t v La. o u a D=~ v o~ a m m m c m -' m y = OLN Tp_..y L., C, NQ F,C sU ~~ `~a'LE~L[- L]o °9`3.. C..«a m a yCL!^C:°, y o.~y'ar= u mV .. L ~aC ^n ~ .. Ca' uJ %~aAaLF.3 ~ m a a c a v« a E J c 9 ~ u N c E m w L$ L u ~ U u~ O C U" .L~ ~ a J Val ~ U E L O h l >. N D a a W N >' n _ ~ a v a V1 L a >> 'n N .E a 1- 3 L n) O a N L O L C - C L E c~ L m r a m n' a 6 y 3 3 ry Q Y. a N r E- a O' aOV oOCaL C].O a~] V Y Y'n oD L~ N;~LnL mV `. TD ~'uu>^vcvc c acmes L ,LE>-ma.L y'ao. ._vv~ .°.za `!L •U'j _Ln > K_ar mLr-°.. aNTalpAr, y p1 ~ ~ O O L G -_ i ad - 6 t .. OI ~ L G q C a 41 N lL a .C a a N OC1 O. 0 N 1 a s W~ N V GO ~ a . p?~= N N a r ti V> 'J uO ~ ~d'I;'L•N-Caa 7 d 7 ~C 3 ~>NO a J Ly NG~ ylN' yj a i i L L m o%= 0= 0 L% O.C '-' O L L L r L t~ C C N E H N Uai ~- ~ F T-LL Uaa~a3D 3O VlgNryal- ~ Fr qrf ~._ -1loJC']gR..- adrnC,o dm~gd cai i.sc °..~oc ~~LO rno v1L"v C N C N ~ J> d y // p a L/ O m N~/ V/ .. > . c Lbmooc'N pN ao c JuO1oca w {- O O rn a d N C C a C d a m A d >. d O Y arm ; L C O a a N d LL C ~ Q d L D -y' a o_ N N C D L g a C L a N= 3 N> cam' a x u `a,c a Cud N '~dd~ N.• >d >O> 707 « CV j'E C;T« d f G° ~ d~ N_ N~ L N V L OL ~ C« ~ Q V L O L N .•L O d U d h L rn O L >." L/ ~' C ~- 7 y u C ~-~ L N a N r J A > •_ L N rn U 0- d C« O '~ a C D ~+ d C N d 7 y~ d J C ujt C~ ~mLY >~vG tCa.G~la ~CHuj a•L•3a~rn«y/',E rnyao d :"~muo ~cm ~3o i /L yumaaaca n 10 w ~ m N« C E Y_ c u Q~ Y E =°• y m ~ o ~ N w L Nub L° >'i nLO p. N/oG>L >cyd J Nw~ BLm u, E`. ~;. Gan- u>•;- u'~ a NV a~>>a 'v NL E; rn~~L GL c ~~ m a ~'° rn -q nN ~ a o% ~~~«°u NrJ/~ a/ 10 C L N a C 9~ l l V a a N 04°-!Q/fp CL NCO CO«N 6L b> L'O a•_ rn C u~ V d ~~ N/~ T N d d N~~ O N h Q 10 N O d a N// a N /oc~a yr: >~n;; ydo« aa~ m dr u'^ o du cI ~LEG> IL-3a~F-ab H3E~ LJOaNrv 7c na`.o~uc~~ W a U L V OM1 a O d L y C 0 :0 y •dd aV C'~CI dIN-aC:a daa m a ~~u [t ua C DuNJ oLL/C ~'!a `rC ~c o`u~3 o a y- pu~•' LN'o LU~~N~O N/UC L `LNarNU -~= x~~o ;NC c" L-L •E~ai°u m+=°•LE'~LL ;_3 d/rn6N O d a~° N T.L. ~ ; U u/ C O_ C: 0 9 N N ]> L~ E ~_ L a° J u y] J C a rn 3 9 Y L 3 a !_^ S L O U °i ~; Y- _ N 'n ; .L / O O Y C 7 6/ N N p =1 D~ a L C C; :/~ O T y Y> ~r C d N dQ IVG C N W- `.r N> N L C_ F w d C_ L ^ `~ J O is a O b O GC a >. G L N a C g d L ; C C ~ a u7i G o .>. > '~ ~'E u N N N o m m m u J N o G' d ry a 7 >. « :. J u~ C L y s O- C 3 N/ O C1 N N° O N 'O G/ C C C O C '0 l a9 NN >.ELC y~vL,~~~uu a~aa -° ~~w>vE c ~•ua Tw d ._ / V N C D 7 y~- V d N J~ « ~~ C d E N O~- QL~$o u°d~ o°adyo~$~yd~~ aA°...td/v ~veg 6 q` u D N1q q L TL ~ p a N r L ,; O g n N C Q C O h ~ u T ~ d u C rn4 a77._ Ch ~7~ Cr0 ~Orn L T N: L C7 3iN, rn~« ~NUd G ccc 73~-./[u c myx w~~°ci Na~E /ocv_c u~aci~ u q~~°E m rn Lrn-~c:: a as - n G 1 7 y ,~ d O T E L t i= 1. C d N• ~i t C >' z .-'. O L .> N D~ O. N. ~- C_ vyy d U 0 y~ 3 g y > L rn G N~ a m° a «LDV ~udi•w -C9G; C ~dELN >. ~~~•y~y C ~ Q. 7~-a 3 L CG L;!I CC:L NCmL'-`vd CBCN.L+N C • Cryd GVdu` F-~•A h9._3h.~d.rO3/N7 4yUIOLNY._ l7Ny O C~ N a • LL• ~! M U d / J 6 • • Igo ~XK~aIT E'L I. MEDIAN OPENINGS AND LANDSCAPING NITHIN MEDIANS IN THE TERRA `lISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY Brett Horner, Assac is to Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel invited public comments. Tom Detlaquila, Lewis Homes, 1155 North Mountain, Upland, stated that Don Thompson was ill and unable to attend the mez ling this evening. He presented a letter from Mr. Thompson requesting Chat a median break be approved on rh~,rcr, c.~9er hetween Elm Av=..^.ue tM Spruce Street, Mr, Dellaquila said that the City had made a verbal commitment to mid-block openings on all blocks in excess of 1,000 feet. He stated that if a median break were not allowed, the project to the ~so uth would have tb be redesioned 'and the land use plan would not be viable. He said they had created a front door concept on the land plans for the condominium project Sased on a Church Street median opening. He sta [ed iown Cen [er Or ive •,res never mea r.c co be a coiiec tur e~ree i. He felt the median would not delete as many trees as stated in the staff report. There were no further pull is comments. Ce mmissioner Tolstoy stated that one of the concepts envisioned with the Terra 9 ista Planned Community was that Church Street and Terra vista Parkway were to provide z^. internal circulation element for people who live within Lhe community to allow them to shop without going to Haven. He recalled that one of the major concepts was that all of Terra 'lists Parkway and Church would nave median is is nd beautification. Y.e felt the number of median breaks within the lcop should 6e kept to an absolute minimum. He felt Chat if the condominium project has its major entrance in the middle of the h', ock, then perhaps the project should be rethought. He stated Chat as both Elm and Soruce will be signalized in the future, a driver could make a U-turn and return to the project. commissioner cm nea test me 1055 of the trees for a median breaK wools create a significant reduction in the effect the median is supposed to be crea tiny. She felt the breaks move away from the planned community theme. Commissioner Tcistoy felt that the median breaks dilute the design of the pia nned communi?y. Commissioner Chi ties stated [hat the breaks would slow down traffic. Chairman Mc Ni e1 felt that Church Street will be a heavily traveled street and median breaks tend to cause safety problems because of cross traffic. Commissioner Tolstoy stated hz would like to direct staff to keep cuts in the median to a minimum. He requested the developer take fewer median cuts into .......:n era ti,,... Chairman Mc Niel suggested staff prepare a policy re solo tian setting forth a minimum distance for length of medians with the minimum length being approximately 280-320 feet. [t was the consensus of the Planning Commission that the specific request of Lewis Homes fora median break on Church Street between Elm Avenue and Spruce Street be denied and that staff prepare a policy resolution to set a minimum length of medians at approximately 280-320 feet. .,.,. l8j - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Mazch 21, 1990 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager SUBJECT: CZVIC CSNTSR DEDICATION The Civic Center/Public Safety Facility is rapidly nearing completion. Finish work is being done, and office furniture is being installed in parts of the bui181ng. All indica- tions are that the building will be available for move-in the second week of May. Because of the building's nearing completion and City Coun- cil's interest in assuring the most successful dedication of the facility, Council should initiate discussion as to the dedication date and related matters, so that planning can nnmmonno fn+~ fho AuAinahinn Res~ectfullf submitted, City Manager JL/pr 90-123 ' ~~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: 1la rch 21, 1990 70: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Diane 0'Ne al, Administrative Analyst SUBJECT: AB 939 LEGISLATION RECOMMENDATION IT IS RECOMMENDED THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE ATTACHED WORK PROGRAM FOR AB 939 AND BUDGET FOR A CONSULTANT FOR THE PREPARATION OF AB 939's REQUIREMENTS TO ADD A SOURCE REDUCTION ANO RECYCLING ELEMENT AND APPLICABLE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS TO THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN AND DIRECT STAFF TO PREPARE THE REQUEST'S FOR PROPOSALS (nF"r'Sj TO SOLICIT PROPOSALS R Af Kf,R01I NI1 A6 939 is recycling legislation recently enacted by the State of California. The objective of A6 939 is to develop and implement a Source Reduction and Recycling Element. The Source Reduction and Recycling Element will be an addition to the City's General Plan. The preparation of this Element will be coo rJ Ina ted by Administration with the support of Advanced Planning. As indicated in Exhibit "C", the Proposed Work Program, staff has presented this work program to both the Environmental Management Commission and the Planning Commission. Both Commissions have adopted the Proposed Work Program. The Proposed Work Program recommends that a consultant be hired to assist staff in the preparation of the Source Reduction and Recycling Element and applicable environmental asses sn~e nts. The consultant will prepare the nine components rCq~ircd `vr i- $Gii rCe ReduCtiu ri dnJ Rer.vciinn Eiameni anri anni irnnio environmental assessments. Staff's review of the nine components of the Element indicate the most extensive component will be the Waste Characterization portion. The Waste Characterization component requires the identification of the constituent materials which comprise solid waste generated within the area affected by the City Source Reduction and Recycling Element. The legislation indicates the waste characterization information shall be statistically representative of the solid waste generated within the ,{u risd is lion of the City and shall reflect seasonal variations. The constituent materials shall be identf fled by volume, percentage 1n weight or its volumetric equivalent, AB 939 Page Two March 21, 1990 material type and source of generation, which includes residentini, CoiiPUe rc ial, industrial, governmental or other sources. Additionally, eight other components are identified in the Source Reduction and Recycling Element and will also have to be addressed in the City's Element. Since the legislation is comprehensive =^d re,.:ires =_ lv^.; range plan for ma gag inn the sal id wa sta generated within the C;ty; Staff is recommending a consultant be retained. Finally, as indicated in the Proposed Work Program, there will be the submission of key progress reports which represent the milestones in the project to both the Environmental Management Commission and the Planning Commission. A Ora ft Element is scheduled to be presented to the Planning Commission on April 24, 199i with a Final Element being suhmitted to the City Council for their consideration and adoption on May 15, 1991. The completed Source Reduction and Recycling Element is required to be submitted to the County of San Bernardino July 1, 1991. Res e~ Submi ted, Oiane O'Neal Administrative Analyst /1140 LII111Cllli. Y~J v, Staff Report Submitted to the Planning Commission dated March 14, 1990 Staff Report Submitted to the Environmental Management dated February 22, 1990 U I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: T0: FROM: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND March 14, 1990 Chairman. anJ kiembers oY the Planning Commission Diane O'Neal, Administrative Analyst AD 939 LEGISLAT [ON AB 939 is recycling legislation recently enacted by the State of California. The objective of AB 939 is to develop and implement a Source Reduction and Recycling Element. The Source Reduction and Recycling Element will be an addition to the City's General Plan. Attached for your review is a summery of AD 939. The preparation of this Element will be coordinated by Administration with the support of Advanced Planning. Administration's input into this process will be through the Cf ty's recently es to bushed Environmental Management Commission. A February 22, 1990 meeting. This Staff Report pray ides an overview and proposed work program for AB 939 and is attached for your review. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review the attached work program schedule and provide comments. Respectively Subm;tted, ~y(\ /~ Diane fr Hnal Administrative Analyst Attachments: Summary of AB 939 Staff Report Submitted to the EMC dated Febniary 22, 1990 SBIaWRY AB 939 CALIFORNIA LNTECAATED WASTE MANAGEHEHT ACT OF 1989 (AB939) CRAPTER 1095 OVERVIEW - Aepeale Title 7.3 of the Govornment Code relating to all aspects of Solid Waste Management. - Recodifiee Part 2 of Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code relating to: + Creation end Authority of Garbage Disposal Districts • Crest ion and Authority of Garbage end Refuse bispoeal bietzicts • Franchisee by Counties * city Garbage Disposal Coniaci9 * Solid Waste Enterprleee Enacts the California Integrated Neste Management Act of 1989 which: • Establishes a new aolld waste management hierarchy. + Creetee a new California intwgrated Waeta Management Board ("Board"). • Abol leAee the county Solid Neste Nanegemant Plart and requires new Integrated Waste Management Plane. nnr.nn an.e . ".,., .r.«. .N id v.ero N..ni nn sm, • Impacts the exportation/importation of waste across jurisdictional boundaries. • Requires Local Enforcement Agencies to be certified by the state. • Changes the state's role in the permitting of solid waste facilities. • Requires mandatory inspection by LEA's and the state. • Places new restrictions on incinerators. NAST6 MANIIOEIRN'f 9I6RARC9Y - Section 40051 requires that in Implementing state solid waste law the Board and all local agencies (cities, counties, 6 special districts) shell: • Promote the following waste management practlcee in order of ,.ic.~«~ 1. Sourer reduction. ~. Recycling and caopoeting. 3. Environmentally safe transformation (incineration) and land disposal at the discretion of the city or county. 18~ Maximize all feasible source reduction, recycling and composting options in order to reduce the amount of eol id weeie that moat be diepoasd of by transformation And land disposal. - Section 40051 is BQt intended to prohibit or delny the development of new or expanded landfill csnael.tp. Sscrion nlvn0 rs ~a±r^a all _-cntiou 'w prepare a siting elmsent whLch identifies areas to be used for the development of adequate disposal capacity. This section ~apreesly requires that the identification of these sizes occur concurrent with the development and implementation of recycling programs. - A similar Waate management hierarchy hoe been in state statute for several years For hazardous waste. INTEGRATED NA8T6 MANRG6 BOA1lD - On or about July 1, 1990, the California Integrated Waeta Management Hoard will cease to exist. It will be replaced by a new fu 11-time, six-member boartl. xr IMINATION OP TEE CoBNMP - Artlcle 2r Chapter 2 of the government Coda relating to the preparation, adoption and revision of the CoSNNp Le repanled. Pffectiva Jenuerv 1. 1990 th re ie o CoSNMP. - The eiim inat ion cf the Co$i7NP means: + No County will have a delinquent coSNMP. + Tt 1• nn lnn~~r ..epees. ~.. w.. ......_SC _. ~_ '~.- -L t. G C..L:~ S e.~.r time an existing facility ie expanded or s new facility ie •itea. + Concurrence by the Board foz nll permits Le jy~gd to ensuring the local permit Se ^^ eist nt wlth state standards. • The Board no longer hoe any autho=iiy to deny a permit based on an inconsistency with the CoHNNP or an inconsistency with a local general plan. + ,gQq~t needs to lA 1989 90 CoSWNP Re 1 1 n ee n COU t at rote is Plan an d9 k i t General Plane. - In addition to the ^Baetin Pes" the state will impose a 50 cant per ton fee on all eolld waste disposed of after January 1, 1990. The fee will nn nue within ?5 days of the and of the calendar quac ter. - State law allows the fee to be increased to 75 cents 1»r ton on July 1, 1990 if the inereaea ie needed to Fund the state's program. Ig7 - State law allows the fee to be increased to $1.00 pet ton on July 1, 1991 if the increase is needed to fund the state's program. .YY el:. VA1 .I. :Y Y. ... 1, a r,I..,Y~%F ~~[:1 - AE 939 eetabliehee n totally new planning process at the county and city level for solid waste management. County Task Force _ _ __r -een asc* ,y _.,r., n„.at rnnvene a Taek Force to assist in coordinating the development ^of City Source Reduction and Recycling Elements. The Taek Force's membership is determined by the board of supervisors and a majority of the cities which contain a majority of the population. - Tha Taek Force moat: • ldant ify solid waste management issues of countywide or regional concern. • Determine tae need for solid waste collection systems, processing facilities and marketing strategies that serve more than one locnl jurisdiction. * Facilitate the development of multi-jurisdictional arrangements for the marketing of recyclable materials. • Facilitate conflict resolution between city source reduction and recycling plans. • Develop procedures to guide tae deoelopcent of a Countywide siting Element. c't s rce Red tion and Recyclina E1 t - on or before July 1. 1991, each city moat adopt a Source Reduction and Recycling Element. Tae element moat place primary emphasis on the lmplamentntion of all feasible source reduction, recycling and composting pro9rems wails ident ifyinq the amount of landfill and incineration cspacity that will be Headed for solid waste which cannot 6e reduced, recycled or composted. - Eech source Reduction and Recycling Element moat include: * A waste charncteritation component. • A emuYCB teduCtlOO Component. • A recycling component. - -aup:.atu-.g cos~prrart. • A solid we6b facility capacity component. + An Education and public information component. • A funding eaaponant. + A apeoiel waaG component. • A household harardoue waste component. i8g C ntv So ce Reductio and Recvcli Sleme t - On or before January 1, 1991 (this will probably bB extended to July 1, 1991), each county moat adopt a Source Reduction and Recycling @lement for the unincorporetsd areas of the county. - Tha content of the county elements are Sdentical to the city elements. C u tvwide Siting Elements - Each county moat prspars a Countywide siting Element which ident if iee areas Go be used for the development of transformation or dispoael capacity. - Each Siting Element moat include: + A~ estimate of the amount of capacity needed for the next 15 years. * M estimate of exieting capacity. Tha Ldentification of specific areas for the location of new or expanded disposal or trmeformaiion facilltiea. - The content of the Siting 6lamsnt and the procsea for adopt inq and amending the Siting @lemsnt is similar to the CoSWMP with two exceptions: 1. The siting Element only identifies incineratione and diapoeal facilltias -- :wt trmsfsr atatione. 2. There are no reauiremente that new or expanded facilltiea be consistent with the Sltinq 6lsmsnt thorsfors the county should consider adopting the 1989-90 CoSWMP Revision as a Strategic Plnn .: o:. C ntv I teaxated Waste Manncement Plans - The County Integrated Waste Mnnagement Plan includes all of the following: * City Source Reduction end Recycling Elements. * County Source Reduction end Recycling Element. * countywide siting 8lement. - The schedule !or submission oC County Integrated Weete Management Plnne ie as tol lose: + January 1, 1992 for counties with lees thnn five ysnrs of rsmalning landfill cnpecity. January 1, 1993 for counties with five to eight years of enpsciiy. I ~ I * January 1, 1994 for counties which have more than eight years of landfill capacity. - Both the County Integrated Plan and the Siting 8lement must be approved by the majority of the cities containing the majority of the population. - The County Integrated Waste Management Plan and Sites elements moat be reviewed and revised, if necessary, every 5 years. Aecvclinp Goals - Each city and County Source Reduction and Recycling Element moat provide for: * Diversion of 25\ of all solid waste generated by January 1, 1995. Diversion of 50\ by the year 2000. - The Board can grant exemptions to the goals and approve a rate lower than 50\ if the Board determines the local agency ie doing th¢ maximum amount feasible. - Failure to meet these goals could result Ln state Elnee of up to $. 10.000.00 per dav. Board Approval - Local Recycllnq E1®ente and County Integrated Plana mu et be approved by the new Irtegrated Nae[¢ Manegemeni Board. Bailors by any city or county to submit an acceptable plan could result in state Linea of up to State Guid¢llnea - State guidelines for the preparation of Source Reduction and Recycling Elements should be out around July 1, 1990. Local Pee Authority - Each city and county is authorized to impose fees to pay for the preparation and implmaentation of recycling elements, Biting elatwnte and the Integrated Plan. The amount of the fees moat ba directly related to the coat of preparation and adoption. importation/Exportation - Each city and county Se authorixad to asses special fees of a reasonable L19911i1G on !hs Lnportation of waste from outside the county. ~qo - The lees nleo atatee that no city or county can export waste to any other jurisdiction unlaea the city or county hna an approved Sousca Reduction and Recycling Blamsnt and/az County Integrated Naata Emagament Plan. This provision dose not tales effect until January 1, 1993 for rountiea wlth lase then five years of ramnining landfill capacity. Other counties will cecelve additional time. - Requires tae Hoard to adopt, by August 1, 1991, certification regulations For local enforcement agencies. - Each LEA moat meet specific criteria to be certified to perform permitting and inspection functions. - Aeauiree the Board to establish s special unit to investigate illegal, abandoned or closed solid weete disposal sites to ensure protection of public health and the environment. - Prohibits the leeuance of a permit for the incineration of col id waste unlaea: • The project used "front-end retycling methods" to remove to the maximws extent EeeeiDls !~ recyclable mnterinle from the waste stream. • Ash is contlnuelly tented !or hazardous constituents. I I I -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT I DATE: February 22, 1990 T0: Chair and Members of the Environmental Management COIDIDlas ion FROM: Diane O'Neal, Administrative Analyst SUBJECT: OV6RVIE9l At(D PROP08RD IIOAE PROOAAM pOR AH 939 RBCOMMERDATIOR It is recommended the Environmental Management Commission adopt the attached Overview and Work Program for AB 939. BACICORODND The Environmental Management Commission adopted its initial work program that included AB 939 at its January 25, 1990 meeting. The Commission wee advised that an overview, analysis and a proposed Work program of AB 939 would 6e provided at its February 22, 1990 meeting. The overview oP A8 939 is demonstrated in Etch ibit "A." The overview of AB 939 provides the objective of this legislation and how the objective will be accomplished. The objective of AB 939 is to develop and implement a Source Reduction and Recycling Element. In order to accomplish this, staff has defined the teaks, resourcae and schedules that will be neceaeary. The tasks will be to develop, imp lament, evaluate, modify, monitor and provide an advisory capacity oL AB 939. The distinction between monitoring AB 939 end providing an advisory component is the day-to-day opnrations. Monitoring the program involves Che actual day- to-day operation3 whereas the advisory camnenent Drovides for periodic reporting. The resources listed identify those entitiaa who will provide input and direction to aech tusk. Staf! has listed "variables" under resources because as AB 939 shakes out, it is possible that additional items will afleet the listed OVEAVIEw AAD PAOP08ED mOA1C PROORA1t 10R AB 939 February 22, 1990 Page 2 resources. These variables will be addressed as they occur and will be adapted to the scheduling of AD 939. The schedule portion of Exhibit "A" provides a time frame for accomplishing each task of AB 939. The attached Exhibit "B" presents an analysis of AB 939. The purpose of the analysis is to separate the material contained in AB 939 into its component parts and to provide a summary. As indicated in Exhibit "B", AS 939 is composed of nine components. These nine components will be integrated to produce a Source Reduction and Recycling Element which addresses the management of solid waste generated within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The proposed work program, Exhibit ^C^, has been developed to implement the Source Reduction and Recycling Element. The purpose of the work program is to provide a chrono- logical listing of the activities required to implement the Source Reduction and Recycling Element. Additionally, the Work orocram 1deOH l~aa pima ~Pamaa fnr aa.•h +n~i••i~ ~ T~~ proposed work program takes each task identitied in Exriibit "A" and lists the necessary items to accomplish these tasks. As with any proposed work program, it must be presented to the City Council for its consideration and adoption. The proposed work program recommends a consultant be obtained to assist staff in preparing the Source Reduction and Recycling Elamant/EIR. Also, it is recommended a Steering Committee composed of the Council's Subcommittee for the Environmontal Nanegemant Commission, the Chair of the Environmental xanagement Commission, and etaft, be formed to salad the consultant. The proposed selection will than be presented to the Clty Council for their consideration and adoption. Addit zonally, the proposed work program recommends the con- sultant's work program be reviewed by the Planning commis- sion. 3tati is including the Planning co®ission in the re- view process because AE 979 requires that the Source Reduc- tion and Recycling Elamant W adopted as part o! the C1ty's General Plan. 193 OVRRVYER AtD PROPOBRD 11ORL PROOIW[ 1OR AB 9~f February 22, 1990 Page 3 Finally, as outlined in the proposed work program, theta will be the submission of key progress :epcrts which represent the milestones in the project. These reports will pzovide an in-depth review of the oroiect by the Commission. Respectfully submitted, Diane O~Neal Administrative Analyst DO/pr 90-61 19~{ ERHIBIT "A" abkonve . 9orarce Reductba 3 Recyclia j plot Tag REBOURCEB SCHEDULE -~ CM's Stag' EMC I/9u -6/91 ~onaac[ nawm Planning comm. DEVELOP Adv. Planning Flre CD Director Budget Engmeerng AB939 Corsultaat Comm. 5erv. Mgr. SNMD Emergency Serv. Mgr. Task Force l:ilai[IpCr of t:omme[Ce CM's Stall' SWMD 7/81 IMPLEMENT Contract Haulm Schools Engineering CCWD Budget Chamber of Commerce AB939 Comultant CM's StaII Emergency Serv. Mgr. 7/92 EVALL!4TE Contract Haulers EMC wdv. Ptamm~g AB939 Consultant Engmeering 9tVMD Comm. Sere. Mgr. CM's Stag g/gl MODIFY Cantract Hauler Engineering CM'a Stag 71'astt Master 9/92.Ongoing MONITOR Er~eaing Semiannual Eeports to CM Comm. Serv. Mgr. Emergency Serv. Mgr. CM's Stall 6/93 Every S mos. ~~~~ EMC AB939 Canaultant •4ad Dept. Varlabin I EXHIBIT 'B' AN71LY8I6 AB 939 is a comprehensive legislative bill requiring cities to develop and implement a source reduction and recycling plan. The source reduction and recycling plan is dof load as a program for the management of solid waste generated within ity. The City source reduction and reuycii.-.y c ^^t shall place primary emphasis on implementation of all feasi- ble source reduction, recycling and composting programs ..ale idert ifyiay the amacrt of landfill and transfv^rmatiun capacity that will be needed for solid waste which cannot be reduced at the source, recycled or composted. The source rc.._cti-- aa- rcycl.rg ele.._rt shalt include .we fc„c__ components: 1. A Waste CF.aracterization Component 2. A Source Raduct ion Component 3. A Recycling Component a. A Composting Component 5. A Solid Waste Facility Capacity Component 6. An Education and public Information Component 7. A Funding Component 8. A Special Waste Component 9. A Household Hazardous waste Component These nine components make up the Source Reduction and Recycling Element and are defined ae follows: aus• cnaracseruasioa comnoaens This component shall identify the constituent materials which compose solid waste generated within the area affected by the City source reduction and recycling element. The information shall b• statistically representative of the solid waste generated within the jurisdiction of the City and shall setlect seasonnl variations. The constituent materials shall be identified by volume, percentage in weight or its volumetric equivalent, material type and source o! generation, which Includes residential, commer- cial, industrisl, governmental or other sources. Ths City source reduction component shall include a program and impleaentation schedule which shows the melhode by which the City will, in combination with the recycling and composting components, reduce a sufficient amount o! solid waste generated within the jurisdiction of the City source reduction and recycling element. 11~ aao~nsmxa Page 2 The City source reduction component shall describe the methods the City will use to determine the amount and categories of solid wastes to be diverted from landfill dis- posal ...,..-pug.`. eGUrce reduction. The City source reduction component shall describe new facilities and the expansion of existing facilities which will be needed to implement the source reduction, recycling and compes*_ing components. The City source reduction component shall evaluate rate structures to reduce the amount of wastes that generators produce and other source reduction strategies, including, but not limited to, programs and economic incentives to reduce the vas oP nonrecyclable materials, replace dispos- able materials and products with reusable materials and products, reduce packaging, and increase the efficiency of_ the use of paper, cardboard, glass, metal and other materials. Heavolinc Component The City recycling component shall include a program and implementation schedule which shows the methods by which the Ci t.V will. in rnmM nafinn with •h. .....a....~: .... .-~_ composting components, reduce a suff iciant amount of solid waste generated within the jurisdiction. The City recycling component shall describe the types of materials which will ba recycled under the programs. The City recycling component shall deacrlbe the methods the City will use to determine the amount and categories of solid wastes to M diverted from landfill disposal through recycling. The City racyclinq component shall describe paw facilities and the expansion of existing facilities which will be needed to implement the racyclinq component. The City racyclinq component shall describe methods which will be used to increase the markets for recycled materials, include, but not limited to, an evaluation of the feasibility o! procurement prelerences !or the purchase of recycled products. Each City may grunt a ptlce preference to encourage the purchase of recycled products. The amount of the price preference shell be determined by the City. 19~ aiar,:sim Page 3 Tha City recycling component shall evaluate industrial, commercial, residential, governmental an A_ ether ourbside, soh ~. le drop orf, and buy-back recycling programs, manual and automated material recovery facilities, zoning and building code changes which encourage recycling of materials,and rate structures which encourage recycling of mwhorial_~ comoostiac Component The City composting component shall include a program and implementation schedule which shows the methods by which the City will, in combination with the source reduction and recycling components, reduce a sufficient amount of solid waste generated within the jurisdiction. The City composting component shall describe the types of materials which will be composted under the program. The City composting component shall describe the methods the City will use to determine the amount and categories of solid wastes to be diverted from landfill disposal through composting. The l`ihv ~hiw _..M .. w..lt J_--~~_i~ facilities ands the expansion of existing facilities) which will be needed to implement the composting component. The City composting component shall daacribe the methods which will be used to increase the markets for composted materials, including, but not limited to, and evaluation of the feasibility of procurement preferences for the purchase of recycled products. Each City may grant a price prefer- ence to encourage the purchase of composted praducta. The amount of the price preference shall W determined by the City. Tha City education and public information component shall daacribe to the board hov the City will increase public awareness ot, and participating in, recycling, source reduction and composting programs. Iqg ]1DTaLY8I8 Pages 4 The City funding component shall identify and specifically describe projected costs, revenues and revenue sources to implement all components oL the City source reduction and recycling element. The City special waste component shall describe existing waste handling and disposal practices for special wastes, including, but not limited to, asbestos and sewage sludge which is not hazardous waste. The component shall identify current and proposed programs to ensure the proper handling, reuse and long-term disposal of spacial wastes. The City solid waste facility capacity component shall include, but it is not limited to, a projection of the amount of disposal capncfty which will be needed to accom- modate the solid waste generated within the City preparing the element !or a 15-year period, reduced by all oP the followino• (a) Implementation of source reduction, recycling and composting programs required by this part or through implementation of other waste diver- sion programs. (b) luny permitted processing, destruction, or transformation capacity which will be avsilable during the SS-year planning period, (c) all disposal or transformation cepecity which hes bean secured through an agreement wit), another Ci*_y or County or tY.rough a.-. agrument with a solid waste enterpriq. The City household hazardow waste component shall include e program and implementation schedule for the collection, treatment and disposal of hazardous vests generated by resi- dences within the jurisdiction of the plan. i~9 ;»:~•n:+ PROP08ED WARE PROGRAM 12AT~ 2-22-90 Ar~Y Present Overview of AB939 to Environmental Management Commission (EMC) AB939 to Planning Commission 3-21-90 Present Overview and Proposed Work Program of A8939 to City Council for their Consideration and Adoption 3-22-90 Staff Develops Request For Proposal (RFP) (Source Reductlon and Recycling Element and EIR( 426-90 EMC Reviews RFP 5-09-90 Planning Commission Reviews RFP 5-16-90 Recommend RFP to Clty Connell for their Consideration and Adoption 5-17-90 Mall RFP's to Consultants 6-18-90 Deadline to Submit Proposals 6-29-90 Steering Committee Reviews Proposals 7-19-90 Steering Committee [nternews Finalists and Recommends Selection of Finalist B-O1-90 Recommend Selection of Consultant and Awazd of ConteaM to City Counctl for their Consideration and Approval 8-15-90 Staff Meets w/Selected Consultant 9-26-90 Share Consultant's Work Program w/Planning Commission 9-27-90 Share Consultant's Work Program w/EMC 1 ~~ >~r ^c~ rROrvs>>;n woi~ pROO>~ oer~ I1-O1-90 e~ Implement Consultant's Work Program 1-03-91 Status Report of Consultant's Work ~_ne_ol Rtahig R~mrf 3-O1-91 Status Report 4-01.91 Preliminary Draft Element Reviewed by Steering Commtttee 4-24-91 Revised Draft Element Presented to Planning Commission 4-25-91 Revised Draft Element Presented to EMC 4-30-91 Conduct Any Follow Up w/Steering Commtttee 5-15-91 Final Element Presented to City Councll for their Cona[deratlon and Adoption .~-taros JYY1Wl GCCWClI[ W 4VUriCy 6-O1-91 Meet w/Steering Committee to Coordinate Implementatlon of Work Program 7-24-91 Status Report of Implementation of Element to Planning Commtaaton 7-25-91 Status Report of [mplementatlonof Element to EMC 8-07-91 Status Report of Implementation of Element to City Council 1-08-92 Final Status Report of Implementatlon of Element to City Coundl 7-00-92 Evaluation o[ Implementaton of AH939 2 ~~ ~ ~~~ rxorosi~n woxs rROax~s DATE 5-00-92 QTY Modify Implementation of AB939 As Suggested By Evaluatlon of AB939 9-00-92 Monitor Ongoing Operations of AB939 a_m-aa a.....,~- ;;~;, iiasur irosinonls) --r-.... 7-00-93 Ongoing Annual Status Reports d Q~ ---- CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~; "I DATE: March 21, 1990 T0: Idayor and Members of the City L'ou nc it it FROM: Diane O'Neal, Administrative Analyst SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EARTH DAY 1990 THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMTSS lON RECOMMENDS THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN EN`lIAONMENTAL BILL OF RIGHTS IN RECOGNITION OF EARTH DAY 1990 BE ADOPTED; EARTH DAY BE RECOGNIZED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE CITY'S CELEBRATION OF ARBOR OAY AND TREE CITY S A I!1VITE THE SC i41v^LS TO PARTICIPATE iii EARTH DAY TYI ROUGH THE BUSINESS EXPO: RECOGNIZE APRIL AS RECYCLING MONTH: AND PROVIDE GREEN RIBDONS FOR THE CITY AND SCHOOLS A7 A CG ST NOT TO EXCEED $500.00 AND TO BE ALLOCATED FROM O1-4532-3900 FUND. O ACKGRDU NO Earth Day 1990 will 6e recognized officially on April 22, 1990 and will mark the beginning of a long-term commitment to build in9 a safe, just, sustainable planet. The event will launch a "decade of the environment," emphasizing efficient use of renewable energy and recycled resources. At its February 22, 1990 meeting, the Environmental Management Commission suggested the above recoimnenda tions for the City Council's consideration and adoption. Briefly, the Environmental Bill of Rights Resolution es tabt fishes an environmental 6i11 of rights in recognition of Earth Day 1990 and also implements programs designed to protect these rights. Also it is recommended the nleFnehinn of Ca. th D." b ''1 a •~~' `h 'i ~ C COmv neu wi.u ~ E Dity nrbar Day dii ,i'ee CityfU.S.A. activities on March 31, 1990. The date, March 31, 1990, has been selected because this is the day the State's arborist will be in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. IL is also recommended the schools be invited to participate in Earth Day through the Business Expo. This invitation would be extended to the schools through a letter from the Mayor of Rancho Cucamonga. Each school district has individual activities planned for celebrating Earth Oay (Recycling Workbooks, poster contests, essay contests, etc.) and the school districts have expressed a desire to "show off" their activities in conjunction with the City booths prepared for the Business Expo. The month of April was designated as Earth Oay 1990 Page Two March 21, 1990 Recycling Month through a Resolution last year and it is reconmend=d the Council aya in ueaiyna to Aprii as Re~yciing Montn. the green ribbons would be given to individuals in conjunction with the "Green Pledge." The "Green Pledge" encourages ind i~d iduals to make an oral commitment "for the record" which challenges citizens' to respect the env iron moor, wn en They ,;prey pu ;.c hy:e consume, and invest. ?he Earth Day 1990 "ureen Pledge will demonstrate that there indeed exists an in Fn ~meA "t; .~;~...., rh_t _ __ ___ ... __.._ ,.., ~~., ~.. ~~., ~~~< ~~~a~cs of the planet an issue second to none. These recommendations are made on behalf of the Environmental Management Commission for the Council's consideration and adoption. Re~specpt{ively Submitted, D i a~ NeaL~~ Administrative Analyst Attachment: Resolution O~ i31 RESOLUTION N0. 90-~" A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY GF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AN ENVIRONMENTAL B[LL OF Rl GHTS IN RECOGNITION OF EARTH DAY 1990 ANO TO IMPLEMENT PROGRAMS DESIGNED TO PROTECT THESE RIGHTS WHEREAS, in ttie past 19 years since Earth Day 1970 (when most Americans learned the meaning of the term "environment"), the health of the environment has con*.inued to decl7ne; and WH'cREAS, at the current rate of consumption, 80 percent of all the oil that will ever be burned will have been used during the lifetimes of people who are now alive; and WHEREAS, we are more than ever a throwaway society, discarding about 5 pounds of garbage per person per day; and WHEREAS, we are adding millions of tons of hazardous wastes to the environment every year with 2.4 billion pounds of toxics pumped into the air in 1988 alone; and WHEREAS, most scientists now agree that, because of the growth in carbon dioxide and other gases in the atmosphere, significant global warming will occur which may have serious consequences to many forms of life - a problem which will become even more severe with continued growth; and WHEREAS, the emission of CFC's into the atmosphere has created a dangerous 40 percent drop in Antarctic mnna. ~r.,r ~..,.......,..... .a:..,__ . serous impacts on all forms of life, inciudfng the human species;-ands V ~ w WHEREAS, toxic air emissions are reducing the pH levels of lakes around the nation, resulting in the destnlction of many aquatic species; and WHEREAS, all of these problems are a result of inefficiency and waste, and the solutions to the problems will promote economic efficiency and economic growth; and WHEREAS, there are many opportunities open to local government to address these critical problems. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve and adopts the following Declaration of Environmental Rights and Responsibilities in reeann;t;on of ~..h Oty 199C, along with a statement of commitment to Implement programs designed to protect these environmental rights and meet these responsibilities. Environmental Rimhts All human beings have the right to elean and healthful air, to clean and healthful water, to the maintenance of activities withlrespect to the emlronmenttl tl;at prevents ~~5 Page 2 - ~~ extinction of formic of life, Lhe degradation of the living and non-ti.ving resources of the earth, and the sustainabitity of the use of the eartA's resources, so that ample resources will exist for generations to come. Environmental Responsibilities In order to achieve the rights declared herein, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes the following responsibilities: I. '. ~ 'City of Rdneho wtauaaya has the raspunsioiiiiy to make a major contribution to solving regional and global environmental and material resource problems by adopting programs and policies which conserve resources and avoid Lhe generation of wastes which pollute our water, land and air. 2. These local programs and policies should address: a. Energy conservation and renewable energy production. b. Solid waste reduction, reuse and recycling. c. Reduction in the use of hazardous substances and the reuse and recycling of hazardous wastes. d. Increased use of transportation management systems and the reduction of Lransportatton needs through improved planning. BE IF FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Reecho Cucamonga recognizes that the tmplementation of these programs will substantially improve the ability of local governments to protect pubNc health and safety an4 promote prosperity. ~O(p - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT TTTP• TO: FROM: SUBJECT: i~iarch ll, 199U Mayor, Members of City Council and City Manager Joe Schultz, Community Services Manager CHAFFEY REGIONAL PARK RECOMMENDATION Direct staff to continue dialogue with the San Bernardino county Parks Department for the purposes of securing 200 acres of open space located at the foot of the mountains between the Deer and Day Canyon washes, commonly known as Chaffey Regional Park area. BACRGROUND The above described area has joint ownership between the Federal Government and the County of San Bernardino Flood Control. County Flood Control lands are on the east, west and south sides of the park and National Forest lands are on the northerly border. Therefore, the site is remote in character and has the advantano „f ~ e,• ,~.,~~ ..o developable open space on all sides. The CFlood Control lands are contemplated for use as trails only, due to the major flood control improvements planned in this area in the near future. The described parcel of land has generated publicity recently and news articles are attached to this report for your perusal. Mr. Steve Maserli, Director of the County Parks Department, states that he is interested in working on a cooperative venture to preserve this open space and possibly forming a joint powers agreement to develop this site if and when it should become available. YIYt'h" ~ T7 The General Plan of regional parks (1988) provides for a "floating" park designation for the upper Rancho Cucamonga area around Chaffey College. With development oP their 1988 Plan, the County's thinking on their land resource had changed. The Flood Control District has adopted a policy to obtain Pull market value for lands made surplus to their needs. GUCAMO ~~ ~c9 ~ ~ ~i' r '~ ~%T ^ F F rn Z 19]7 Chaffey Regional Park March 21, 1990 Page 2 Regarding future development of a regional park in the Chaffey College area, the Regional Parks Department has been directed to research the area. Second, Flood Control District has stated they would discuss the possibility of a park on lands surplus to their needs and would entertain ~o:,y-Lvs,u lease arrangemsnce. As stated above, staff will continue to w~~x towards an agreement between the City and County to eP~ablish a regional park in the upper Rancho Cucamonga Chaffey College area. On a related matter, Council asked me to rc?earch grant money for projects described herein. Staff continues to monitor resources available Prom the Federal and State Government. A few months ago we were successful in application for $250,000; a grant from the State for design development of the Northeast Community Park. Council also asked about Jurupa Park in Fontana. This was city land developed by city money. Tha County was not involved. I will be happy to answer other questions you may have. Respectfu/ll/~y (/s)ubmitted, Jo scriultz / Community Se es Manager JS/kls Attachments ~OV Chaffey Regional Park Stafif Report - March 2:, 1990 Attachment o nal ~£' ~rl~ ' Q t~ ~ g a ~ ~...~ N ~,.~ ~. Oro ~ ~.~,~,.., ~. v. ~cci i as barrier to quarry growth Staff Whtarert eludi°Q a milting °P°°°°°• nm Sod Dis44t Bupsrgsec Jon Mi- . Wsk Pl+npnd tyo yuerry. BAN B®tNABpIIYO = ~°- kels believe the quur~^ specs. t°n Idsnd B k C Conosy Couasal ALm kfarke ~erid )r does cwt Imow it ehe h a?iri.ls aro 1 hblishiog a ~ ido aa• tagkoal park • as o..,ma7 emetheler have their sights on .the 400 acts pack would fagllY intarferc with Iolaod Back's rights. " m 400 setae north d 8aaoho Catamaaga -sot adz b pte. . Bstabliahiog a park would ~inh say hopr Pot pssndlag Ws haven't studied the isms y7e~t,, 6e said. "f, amply dank t o ~ ' ' ' ants 9uiekly dipppsariag wil• daraws mess, hw W keeps she atine,bsaid. . lolaad Bodo Co a@Iciiia were a w: ,.. ThiP poiat Y,~b81d hate lp ~ At epsealasa•^~ artendiag a~MSher9aart7 6'am . tieavailabH !or eammeaL Mos. ~ ppapa&B~~ Peska'De- The area, W b• dubbed Chef- be ~ W eg a leech' ~oa the 1alt~ Rxk Co. is w4y a wooed- PAR said 4.000 ass is louted a~sceat the 00 land awned hY the ~ Fo d C Mt ~p~s'y~~~ M~' '1Le - °~l~ set W mast open ya~e gpals set two ten's aio. i iE ~~°~e ~ o ontrol I)istrist, Davsloo- hstnrw it i a °,a.AT..t a s ga saut ,6art- ~ taeni wows .probably entail d a 'ePere, he yla, "" "' -~ -~ ~'" wM° u naaoawt atse" m tee M ~ ~ l~ ~ ty'pRia proposal to havq the auu. ty' osi Parke end Flood pry ~ • thn dte d • proposed {Opacse ~ C o a sort, to trying to Waviate that 0 ' B k out a th }pp~~,~~ 0°°a g° COm'se• d e a l for e 1~d" w.a~ ty Flaod Control Direc• Im Ben Miller said a federal by the Board of Bu approved Monday. The bard d~ite bt sd - Mikels said ii might be bl~ wprk ow a deal with the seamen[ on the lend pesludes my eateneive development, io- e e county ettormye to stret4y aqy legal qustios mnttruin¢ the d gp dthe ~ e~cees° (or LaB 6elde ~°ian:r..... ~O~ Chaffey Reai pool Park Staff Report - March 2i, 1990 Attachment The Sun A puk witA little tlerel- opmint other IAN 4LIe ie pro- Putts Ior 2p0 acne of Sp Bsr neM!no County nom eont.oi IoM Y tke Mee of fodYlla north o(Rancpo CUeamoe{a The MwnlYY flood eontiW tlb~ iPIM up MMIW Mrkr tlpMM' urvYLLw,r Yql- tlW W diuvu Aow td WORMY oar i]ry Creep cen be pRtl fR rtcrtauon wflhRl Noletly • M quirtment tA•t it Eo kpt uopm ipett. Superviwr Jon Ylkelt pined county bond approval to iNtiale tlitruttioPe.eue{ettin{the titebe known u ChalPoy Re{bnal Perk. County ofRMW Rave proposed NoNillaiaaa e'tin lp64 io tlw YIkeY tefd tM rMrkUOmon the PUParn tlta Wens AnDOeedm a cenNtla, tp iWalvlq Rderal W for awpirin{ pinptitR aetl MiU t1,1111ML 1,1 the Dq CIMA tlraivep was of 61IwepM Are' nue. Il 4 RWAb the laotl Rdd M bued to tM pMb tleRr4 pwnl for a tokaB {/ • rev. M sew. Tka e1N b ntat ro Rtetl mp' trot proverb wken Rourtp StrM Rock ClutOR Co. V pR paNe{ taptl aad Pavel mAtlp{, R taid~iha potel ~l MYnel.~erm' stl In • MotlY ap GvaloWtM county eYRM of ~ epd AiYio{. bqM uG pteyeM trYh, One{oal waaW peso Ita• i411NtiN tM else w116u Mk RIw. I park could feature trails y~o~ ~3 Lewis Homes Management Corp. nsstanM,,,~e,n..+~.~r.o.a~smitro~.r~~.stresnuvss.ovvt -RECEIYED- ^..Iil' of RANCIIDdIOAIAD-~~ q MMwlti -. ~ MAR $11990 ~ March 21, 1990 7~f~s1111~t~J~r~51R City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Brett Homer Re: Median Island Policy Gentlemen: we wish to continue our appeal of the above item from tonight's Council meeting to the first meeting in April, and would appreciate your rescheduling it for us. Cordially, Lewis Homes Management Corp. i /~.. /~'. Don Thompson DMT/vs ~ a ¢ z z z d Y \ \ J N J J C W N V• N L 6 O L L- 1~ 4I N •-• •-+ •r J \ J J J J J J \ J \ r ~l N p O p J J J J J J J J J 2N N N N 1 p p 6 6 6 d d O d W I I ~ T ~ ~ ~ z s Z J J £ S U } tJ W O J •~I C p Q P N y V 01 Q 1O h O O •-~ N U 6 N QI N Ir P l(1 !t] 10 to ~ U O .+ N N 1p O J Y Y Y M Y k W w Y Y Y Y / / Y / W •F P O' Y~ W W W C 4~• Y P 0. N N N W N yJ W tJ N N m O N N N N O N O' LO N d' 6 ~O O O N W 61- O in h 1[t O b O O O O O ~ O O t0 M O~ (7 O W b 1(f 00 uJ C P t0 N O b O O O\ O O ~O N W .-I N H Vf N N r~ N N •--I N r+ •-' N N d / O O ~ V L / C L Y / T UI N P. U L~ L U W U) + C C L / ~ ~~ N A Yl Y i ~[ ~ M q q T W q ~ I+- L/ i > > L c u u u c a ~ o q ' ° u R v z > i z a s m s u z ~ I T i c 4 c o o ++ o a . o+ O o o t K W e N 'O 6' O ~r- W LL W 01 C O Y Y C U Y u p~ p q q 9 L d (3] N O q U 41 C 0 _ r ('J 6 ~ C C q 6 C O C1 N L L 00 r d V pL / q N q N L \ J O r0 O L T W E V N Y) d C N L£ rtl W ti V N L L N q L L Y C q E P b N N C Ul C J U 7 t V N W ZO C rr+ 41 6 O N ~ Z O N O SS O L VU N IO JS N W O: q q t7 L' 9 -~O .G h O V I 6 U - _ LL~ N t ~ v ~ O r Y C C O O V N b q ~ W V.. t ~ y p L L LL N V L Q Y C t Yl N N M / O N O O LL t Y H V U Y q ~ C O C LL uNf N O+ m 2 c 4 a ~ ~ U LL OL Q J l0 h O ~ O\ ~ p O 0 l • M 10 O M1 p V ph 1 M1 4 O ~ ~ W ~ S h ~ W GO 0~0 .Nr .Ni p p pp m ~ .~, ~. z _ _ _ a o d J J J J J 6 V1 J N N 1 ` ~ ~ J J J J J J J O d L d G. O 1 6 1 N J S J $ g S S Y E N O O O N O O C O (n N O 1p N ^ H m V •~ h+ Y V- w W p W im Y V Y W •F O V - V - Q Q W W C C G N • • • y~ N q •~ q P U) 0 O N P N Q N 0 0 G N O N U OI P.~ T 0 0 0 O O O O O O O N N ~ i n F n O O O O O N O O• m m rO q'O q9 V N V1 (n N N m •p ~ m L t L W m N C •-I 01 Tf • q OI pi E ca c - c O w =° o A J O - v v v v + + _ _ N r d r• ti r• N N q y N J q V q 17 a E a a L L L N C V VI L L q 3 'A 3 f 2 q m w m C 1- W F+ ~ U '~ C K (J O q V q q N r d .- N ~ Y U C C W C q T W N H 61 •- W O. L ~ N VI q N N J N L T L n L q U ~ 0 C 9 y q O q0 q0 Y N ' OI U 13 O U ~ N N q L Cd C g C O m Z ~ m C v W o v a 1- s E t E m v o E o u m a m V U q q U q C OI C Y .~ • O U N C V •n i q N C 01 n O y ~ y ' ' - U ' p q i y ~ U E F U1 UU Ol (L t J { N N0l NN 9 q q L q ~ O ~ N U O U E^ U~^ C q F1 O Y Y~ v i~• V-.Ai V v v t c i O OI^N Olgf7 OIgt7 q C V O C O C O '- C r Cf0 ~ C ~~ C c ~ Y L v « .+ c o m c ~ ~ ei+ vey _ c LL e a ~ LL q N q V f-• N }I •. ~ O M1 O N a~ x x N m a a c u al u T1 u T u M ^ Y1 N N O ti N Y'1 01 Iti W t b O C 4 N C D CC a m q 4 O 4 0 "'~ •"~ m m ~ •y p t 01 m m W J • x Z J L N Y y N L rn E N 9 CL L J A C O N V N O N J Z a m / A ~+ c c rn d a+ d o 2' J 2 J 6 O Y C N U N W N C N OI M VI N c v .. a c ~ E C d E u ~ d d D Y C d ~ O d v > T L L > > N IA N ~ O N N L N Y N C N C O V N Z 9 a •+ c m 0 K 2 O Y L N E e A J N u J N N C d Y O d Y L F E v c m J M m T G d ~+ O d J J J VI d 6 ~-~r~` ~~ '^ ~ ~i "s~ Cli'V' OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA v ~a c¢i„ n,.. ~o' u.::,,s • u,,.:m, ::^.: ~ a::x,.r.:.: ~¢co, „ iai w~a :+:, A G E N D A Adi ou~~ed Joint Meeting Rancho Cucamonga City Council Public Safety Commission tlar h 23 1990 - 7:00 o.m. Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Cantor (Muscat Rooms) 9791 Arrow Highway Rancho Cucamonga, California A. CALL TO ORDRR - CITY COUNCIL ,. r.e~y~ ..; ,,. may: ,.,.~ 2. Roll Call - City Council: Buquet Alexander _, Stout _, Brown _, Wright Roll Call - Public Safety Commission: Yankovich __, Curatalo _, Ghee _, Noyd Quintana _, Amodt , west §~_ JOINT ITEMS OP DISCUSSION .s Video presentation of emergency drill. ::.,~nm..,H,. xmw• William 1. AleaanJer Charles I Nuquet II nw M.~.x.. Ih•o nis I Slow DeMrtah N. Nrnwn Pamela 7. Wright Jack Lam, AICP City Council/Public safety Commiax ion 3oint Meeting March 28, 1990 Page 2 C. COIOIUNICATIONS PRON T86 PUBLIC Tais v the tiae and platy for the gaaeral public co xddrxxx toe City wove ii sad the Public sefatp Coviasioa. state law prohiaita the City wuncil and Public safatp Coaiaaion frw addressing anp Sasua sot pravioualp iacluded on the Ageada. Thu Citp Council and tha Fublic Safaiy Coeaiccion eay receive teatieony and set the setter for s subsequent aaatiag. Caaenta era tc be 1Lited to five riauta• par individual. ~ aD.TOVRN1B47T I, Debra T. Adaas, CSlp Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucaeoaga, hereby esrtify tact a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda wa• posted oa 11arc6 23, 1990, uwatp-tw O2) 6ouss prior to the eeetiag par Oovarawnt Code 56953 rt 9320- C Rase Liae Road.