HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990/05/02 - Agenda PacketCITY
' r_ COUNCIL
I
I ~
ACi~1V 1~A
II
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGULAR MEETINGS
Ist and 3rd Wednestlaya - 7:00 p.m.
May 2, 199J
Lions Park Community Center
9161 Hase Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga
t/M
City Councilmembers
Dennis L. Stout, Mayor
Pamela 1. Wright, Covnrilm<mber
Deborah N. Brown, Mayor Pm rem
Charles J. Buque4 coundrm<mbr.
William J. Alexander, cornenmrmDer
•~•
i
Jack Lam, c;o~Monogrr
James L. Markman, cm~ Aunrne.~~
Debra J. Adams, clrv errrw
City Office: 989-1851 Lions Park: 480-3145
City Council Agenda
Hay 2, 1990
PAGE
All items eubvittad for the Citp Cocacil Ageada must be is
I i writing. The deadline For submitting these items is 5:00 p.m.
i
oa the Wedaeaday prior to the meeting. The Citp Clerk's
' I, ~ III Office zecaiven ell such items.
i
~ i
I
%
'
! !
A. CALL TO OADER ~
!i I ',
I 1. aVll Vata. uYUO~. ~• Tles~nricr _____ '
II CI !! Brown , and Wright
! ~~ ~~' B. ANNOVNCENENTS/PRSSSNTATIONS
!i 1. Presentation to Lloyd Michael, Retiring General Manager,
~ Cucamonga County Water District.
C. C0IRIVRICATION9 PRON TR6 PUBLIC
Tbis is the timm and place foz the gmamral public to address
the Citp Couacil. Stets law prohibits the Citp Council from
addraa•ing any issue not previously iacludsd oa the Agenda.
Tha Citp Couacil may recaivm testimony sad wt tbm matter for
a subsequent meetivg. Co~eats •re to be limited to five
~ ainutea per individual.
I
I
~
p. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Covaent Calendar items are aapectmd to 6e
routine sad nos-coatroveseial. Thep will be acted upon by the
~ ~ Council et one time without discuaaion. Anp itu up he
~ removed by a Councilmsmbmr or member of !hm audience for
discuaaion.
! 1. Approval of Minutes: April 4, 1990
2. Approval of Warrants, Register Noe. 4/18/90 and 4/25/90 1
and Payroll ending 4/11/90 for the kotal amount of
$1,705,565.71.
3. Approval to transfer $50,400.00 between Community 9
Development Block Orani funded 9outhweet Cucemonge
Street ImprOVemant prof acts.
4. Approval to adopt a raeolut ion In support of H.R. 3389 10
wAich Sa thm Billboard Control Act o[ 1989.
City Council Agenda
Mny 2, 1490
PAGE
~~ ~~ RESOLUTION NO. 90-175 1Q
i I
i II
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THfi CITY
I
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO BUPPORT
H.R. 3389, THE BILLBOARD CONTROL ACT OF 1989
' I 5. Approval to award and execute a Professional Service9 16
I '. Agreement (CO 90-064) with RJM Design Group,
I I *_ncormretna. r~ n-~~+-~ ^__,-,o, npvculca2lone ana
I
i I
I estimates for landscaping the Milliken Avenue Underpass
'~ I East and Weat Parkways (7th Street to Jersey Boulevard)
and Median (6th Street to Jersey Eculev4rd) for a fee
I ~ ', ~~
I
~. not to exceed 537,000.00 to be paid fran the
I ~ I Redevelopoent Agency Eu nda, Account No. 13-50300. An I
' additional 106 contingency allowance to De established
I for use under the approval of the City Engineer.
j 6. Approval Co execute Improvement Agreement and 16
Improvenent Security for 2arcel Hap 9350, located on
the northeast corner of ease Line Rond and Milliken
Avenue, submitted by The William Lyon Company.
I I RESOLUTION NO. 90-17b
I ' 1]
I I
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
I ! OF RANCHO CVCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
...^^^,pv
p
„T
SECVRITY
POR PARCEL MAP 9350
=
7. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for
~ 19
I ~
Tract 10349 located on the west aitle oP Sapphire Street
~ at Thoroughbred Street, submitted by V7alton Hillside
'. Estates.
21
RESOLUTION NO. 40-177
I
j A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
~ OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION AND
~ ~ IMPROVEMENT SECURITY POR TRACT 10349
~i
o .1 _ ..,...., _ A ___ ___ __ __
Appmv_ tc nxncuta I,~.p.,..om_n. y_oer„ent Exte..vi.... f...
JJ
Pnrcel Nap 9498 located on the northeeei corner of Hevan
Avenue end 4th Street, submitted Dy Reiter-Rinker
Gateway.
PAGE
~q ci[y Council Agenda
8 i aY ~ Hay 2, 1990 3
e roP m' ?$3`
~ li
~~~ I l i RESOLUTION NO, 90-178 2)
I i
~
~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
II
I
I OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
'~ i
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
I
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOA PARCEL HAP 9448
i i ii 9• Approval to accept Improvement e, Release of sonde and
~ i nocxce ox compxecxon ior:
~ ~ DA 87-05, located on the eouthweet corner of JereeV 28
I I
I ~,
! i ~. Boulevard and Vincent Avenue.
l
I I I '~ ~i Reiaasa:
' Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $440,000.00
I
29
RESOLUTION NO. 90-179
A RESOLUTION OF THS CITY COVNC IL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING
THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 87-06 AND
I 'i AVTNOAI2ING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
I COMPLETION POR THE WORZ
OR EE-21, located on the south aide of 9th Street 30
i
II et P e a v, e P
i Release:
i
I Faithful Performance Bond (Street) S 11,000.00
i
i
I ~
RESOLVTION NO. 90-180
i
31
~ I A RESOLUTION VF TH$ CITY COUNCIL OF TH6 CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING
TH8 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR EE-21 AND
I AVTNORIZING TH6 PILING OF A NOTICE OP
COMPLETION POA THE WORZ
30. Approval to accept the Old Town Pnrk Project.
RESOLUTION NO. 90-181 ~ 33
A RESOLUTION OB TH6 CITY COUNCIL OF THS CITY
OP RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING
THS PVBLIC iMPROVEHSNT3 FOA THB OLD TOWN
PARS PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING TH6 FILING OB
A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR T_NS WORA
City Council Agenda
May 2, 1990
PAGE
11. Approval of Preliminary Engineer's Reports and Setting 34
Public Hearing on Jure 6, 1990 to levy the Annual
Assessments and approve the Final Engineer's Reports for
Landscape Maintenance Districts Numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 7 and 8.
RESOLUTION NO. 90-182 i 38
~ I ~ _ _
Vr
~'
N O
~
CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA
OF
OF
RANCHO
I PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY BNGINEER"S
II ' ANNUAL REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
j I
DISTRICTS NUMBERS 1, 2, 3A, 3E 4, 5, 6, 7
i
i I
~ ,uru a ~I
~~
RESOLUTION NO. 90-183
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TN6 CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING
IT3 INTENTION TO LEVY AND NLLECT
ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCB
DISTRICTS NUMBERS 1, 2, 3, d, 5, 6, 7 AND
~ 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1990j91 PURSUANT TO THE
L9MDCCAPIN6 ANn LIGHTING ECT OF 1972; Apo
OFFERING A TINE AND PLACE POR HEARING
OBJECTIONS THERETO
ii 12. Approval of Preliminary Engineer's Reports snd Setting 79
i Public Nearing on June 6, 1990 to levy the Annual
Assessments and approve the Final Engineer's Reports for
i Lighting Maintenance Districts Numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
i and 6.
i 83
RESOLUTION NO. 90-184
A RESOLUTION OF TXS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S
ANNUAL REPORTS FOR LIGHTING MAINTENANCB
I
I DISTRICTS NVM36RS 1, 2, 3, d, 5, ANO 6
City Council Agenda
May 2, 1990
PAGE
RESOLUTION NO. 90-185 I IQ$
A RfiSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING
~ ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT
ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICTS NUMEERS 1, 2, 3, 6, 5, AND fi FOR
FISCAL YEAR 199C ~.- PL:...UR1P: TO .....
i LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OP 1972; AND ~
OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HHARING
OBJECTIONS THERETO
I ~ I - .vavum nonT NANCF.R
~~ The following Ordinavicea have had public hearings at the Line
of first reeding. Second readings are expsetsd to be routivs
i ~ and nov-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council
at one tLa without discussion. The Ci[y Clark rill read the
title. Any ites can be reswved for discussion.
it No Items Submitted.
,y. MVEATISBD PUBLIC BEARINGS
I
The following itess have boon advertised and/or posted •s
~ ~ I publ is beeringa se required by lsw. The chair rill open the
I meetivg to receive public testimony.
i 1. CONS O TON NE 110
AS A PRIVATE STREET AND E%EMPTING THE ABUTTING
i
~ PROPERTIES PROM AEO7IAEMENTS BET PORTH IN CHAPTER 12.08
I OP THE MUNICIPAL CODE
112
~ RESOLUTION NO. 90-186
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI POANIA, DEBIGNATTNG
STRANG LANE AS A PRIVATE STA88T AND
EXEMPTING THE AEUTTING PROPERTIE9 PROM
~ p„v,QUlpypv-Nmc :m cv>nmp IM ny_e pmaR 12.^° OF
THE MUNICIPAL CODE
2. 114
);J;AR 1990-91 - The adoption of the Plnal Statement of
Community Devnlopment Object ivse for program year 1990-
91 and the preliminary selection of projects based on
an anticipated grant of $463,000.00.
City Council Agenda
May 2, 1990
PAGE
I REEOLVTION NO. 90-187 1 145
I I ' I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
I li OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING
I THE FINAL STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
I '
I OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS FOR
CI ~,
I THE COMMVNZTY DEVELOPMENT BLOCR GRANT
I I pp•-••~~RIU. °.... ^RCJ^VP.T~ YET° 1....-._.
3. STREET NAME CHANGE 90-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -A
147
'. i proposal to change the name of Rochester Avenue (old
~I i '~~
I portion) from 4th Street to a point approximately 600
~ I~ I feet north of 6th Street, a distance of approximately
i~ I i I
i 8/10 of a mile. Planning Conmiseion recommended name
t change to Charles Smith Avenue. Proposal to oleo change
I i the name of the portion of Rochester Avenue (new portion
south of 6th Street). Planning Conmieeion recommended
name Change to Aocheater Court. Alternative et rest
I ~ names may be considered by the City Council.
i RESOLVTION N0. 90-188 175
A RHSOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THfi CITY
1 OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
9TREET NAME CHANGE NO. 90-01 TO CHANCE THE
NAME OP TWO PORTIONS OF ROCHESTER AVENUE TO
CHARLES SMITH AVENUE AND ROCHESTER COURT
' i RESPECTIVELY
G. PUBLIC OEARIN09
I i The following items hove no legal publication or posting
requireme¢ts. The chair will open the meeti¢g Lo receive
public Leatimowy.
1. ON P P OP C 178
V 8493 W N V N
I ' (CO¢Einued Srom April 18, 1990)
I I I i I I B. CITY HAHAOSR'S STAPP REPORTS I
Thm following ilws do sot legally require anp public
batlmony, ellhough the Chelr mey open the acting for public
1 i¢put.
1. CONSIDEMTION OP TMCT 13318. MAYFLOWER-BAYOUN - 19~
Dweloper'e request o[ April ZB, 1990 to accept s cseh
deposit Ln lieu of withholding occupancy.
City Council Agenda
May 2, 1990
PACE
I ~
I I. COUNCIL BVSI17E83
II
I II The following itesa have beau raqueeted by the Citp Council
i ~ for diacuaaion. Thep are not public hearing items, although ~
I the Chair may open the meeting for public input.
II ~
i I 1. CITY ADDRESSING POLICIES I 194
i
2. CONSI ERATION TO A PROVE TH s vA c u 'ne
~~~
SPORTS PIELD LIGHT CURFEW POLICY AT RED SILL CITRUS
TITTLE LEAGUE SENIOR FIELD FOA THE DATES OP JULY 8 - 20
I
I
- Thie variance will apply only to the 90-foot base path
i '. field locaietl at the northwest and of Red Hill Park.
I ' ! I I
204
I ? DISCUSSION O SU PORT OF NO 5 M I W EA
~ ~ I IST ICI SITION N W R C N V N 8
I
4. CON ON O G
2Q$
PROPOSITIONS 108. 111. AND 116
RESOLUTION NO. 90-189
214
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COVNC IL OP THE CITY
OF PANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING
PROPOSITION 116, TH8 RAIL TRANSPORTATION
BOND ACT
' I i
Rfi SOLUTION NO. 9U-19U I
G1D
i A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CJUNCIL OF THE CITY
i i OF PANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALSFOAN IA, SUPPORTING
' 'I ii PROPOSITION 111, SNE TRAFFIC CONGESTION
I~ i RELIEF AND SPENDING LIMITATION ACT OF 1990,
i I
AND PROPOSITION 108, THE PASSENGER ARIL AND
' CLEAN AIR 80N0 ACT OF 1990
5. E W DA NO T S C
Report by Council Suhconwittee. (orel Report)
6. s
HALATRION SPPAYING PROGRAM (Orel Report)
This ie the tLe for Citp Council to SQeoLltp the itae they
wish to diwuss et the next meeting. These itae will not he
discussed et this westing, onlp ldentitled for the mez!
eating.
City Council Agenda
Nay 2, 1990
PAGE
i R COIOIONIGTIONS PRO11 TH6 PUBLIC
I This is !ha ties and lace For the eaeral
p g public to address
the City Council. state law prohibits tae City Council frva
addressing sap issue not prey ioualy included w Lhe Agenda.
The City Covacil may receive teatiaoap and set the attar for
' a aubaequeat meeting. Cowmeuta are to bs limited to five
1 1 1 1 1 1 minvtea gar individual.
L. ADJOIIMMQiT
NEETZNO TO ADJOURN TO AN BZECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSSION LAMIR
RELATIONS.
I EZSCUTIOB 8698ION TO ADJOURN TD A JOINT AEETINO NITS TA6 ~
PLANNING COMMI99ION ON TV68DAY, MAY 8, 1990, 9t30 P.M.r IN TE6
POAUN OP T~ LIONS PARR COidlRi2TY GAITER.
i, Debra J. Adams, Clty Clerk of the City of Aancho Cucamonga,
hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foragoing
agenda was pasted on April T7, 1990, seventy-two (7T) hours
prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 9320-C Baae
i
I Line Road.
i
April 4, 1990
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA
CITY COUNCIL HINUTEE
Remtlar Hinutee
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on
.._.. .:=y, nPi 11 +, s" c cne Lions Park community Center, 9161 Baee Line
RoatlCe Aancho Cucamonga, vCal ifornia. The meeting was called to order at 7:26
p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout.
Present were Councilroenibara: William J. Alexander, Deborah N. Brown, Char lee
J. Buquet II, Pamela J. Wright, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; JamN1a Merkm;an, City Attorney; Jerry
B. Fulwood, Deputy City Hanager; Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager; Rick
Gomez, Community Development Director; Olen Jones, 8r. ADA Analyst; Ruee
Maguire, city Engineer; Chuck Wachter, er. Public Works Inspector; Monte
Preacher, Public Works Engineer; Cathy Becker, Public Works Inspector; Otto
Erout il, Deputy City Planner; Lsrry Xendereon, Principal Planner; Nancy Pong,
ar. rrannnr; nrecc Horner, a9eoclaca manner/ Jeiz wraVOL, Aeelet8n< Planner;
Jerry Grant, Building Official; Jim Hart in, Plan Check Coordineior; Joe Scaultz,
Community Services Manager; Ingrid Blais, GI9 9uperv ieor; Jim Xart,
Administrative Services Director; Susan Neely, Finance Manager; James Frost,
City Tzeasurer; Duane Baker, Sr. Administrative Ae9istant; Diane O'Neal,
Administrative Analyst; Susan Mickey, Administrative Aide; Chief Dennis Michael,
Aancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Lt. Bruce Feiner, Aancho Cucamonga
Bherif f's Station; and Debxa J. Adams, City Clerk.
B. ANNOVNCEIBMPS/PREEBNTATIOIPB
B1. Preeentakion of Proclamation Declaring April 1990 ae Census Honth in
Aancho Cucamonga.
Mayor Stout made the presentation to Nacho Cracia, Crace Jones and Maria Pagan.
B2. Preaentntion of Proclamation Daeignet ing April es Aecycling Month in
Conjunction with Celebration of Earth Day 1990.
Mayor Stout roads tha presentation to Grace Jones.
City Council Minutes
April 4, 1990
Page 2
H3. Presentation of Proclamation Declaring April 1990 ae Earthquake
Preparedness Honth.
Mayor Stout read the proclamation.
B0. Mayor Stout presented a proclamation to Jerry Grant, euildin9 Official,
for being recognized as Building official of the Year by the California Building
officials.
85. Sack Lam, City Manager, stated that Mayor Stout has been selected Nayor
of the Year by WE TZP and will be presented with the award at their annual
conference.
H6. Councilmember Drown suggested staff attend an informational course to De
held a., t.^.e Clarion Notal an May 31, 1990 dealing wLth entering unsafe buildings
after an emergency.
87. Councilmemher ezown reported that Caltzane has advised the lawsuit from
1985 involving nn employees union, that the employees won, and informed that
this could have affects on the City doing business with Coltrane. Sha suggested
staff ohtain a copy of the Lawsuit from Nee McDaniel to look at this more
closely.
f • • R
C. COMMUNICATIONS PROM THE PUBLIC
~i. nwyuaac uy aceve narcrnu, n pwcnnciei rnaiunnc or cna wuuur wye ancacnn,
tc discuss with the City Council the release of utilities Eor IS homes in Tract
13644; discuss Building Division's inspections of Tract 13604; and discuss
Engineering Division's review and acceptance of public improvements on Hermosa
Avenue.
Steve Martino, 10161 Woodridge, eteted to Council what hie request wee
which he had submitted in writing to the Citp Clerk's Office. He also
distributed additional information to the City Council. He pointed out
to Council the Stems on the list et ill left io be completed es required
by Engineering. He felt different standards were being used tox different
project e, and felt that if it wasn't Nordic that wee in question, that the
people would be allowed Lo move in. Ne cefarred to the tranaeript of the
August 16, 1989 City Council meeting, end various areetinge he hse had wish
staff end xepreeentativee from Nordic. Ha felt Nordic did not haw the
money to eo rurtnsr worn necauee ins ciey would not reUUe utilitiss
which were holding up escrows from closing.
Mayor Stout eeked Mr. Hartino if he had Einal inspection on hie house.
Mr. Mari ino stated no.
City Council Minutes
April 4, 1990
Page 3
Mayor Stout suggested that if the street was capped, which he felt could be done
this week, and if the west aide drainage is corrected, he elated he would not
mind releasing fifteen houses, and to re-evaluate the community trail situation
if Nordic dose not finish it. He felt this would protect the City also. He
stated he would ask Aick Gomez, Community Development Director, to work on which
fifteen hcuaes should be released.
Counc it memher Rum,et felt the City Council aheu ld he very cautious with this
idea.
The Council questioned the legality of them taking any action at ihie meeting.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated the Council could add an action to the
agenda by four-f ifthe vote and then act on Lt.
The Council discussed the policy and procedures for releasing homes within ihie
tract and expressed their concern for leverage with Nordic.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated that if these homes were released ae
suggested by Mayor Stout, it does not eliminate what Engineering has stated in
the record w!th regards to completing the trade and the hazard it could create.
Jerry Grant, Building official, suggested that the fifteen houses to 6e released
be completed before this ie done and util tiles are turned an. Be also brought
up an emergency access road that has not been completed yet.
Hike Robles atsted he felt the Clty Council was misusing the information
cnay nave Dean recelving. Me al ao aiatem no Lelt tnelr et Cetoh of Hermosa
was not dangerous, Dut wee, Sn fact, one Of the beet parts on that street.
He added all he wanted was to be able to move into hie house.
Councilmember Alexantler elated he did not want the prospective homeowners to be
punished, but did not want them to come back at a later date and say they were
sorry that they ever Waved 1n. Hs added he felt the City was et a point where
they could start releasing homes.
Mre. Huggins of Woods I atsted she has had nwetinge with Mr. Stranger who
has made promisee and not kept them. She added she hue received a copy
of Mr. sullivan'e report. Hhs atsted she Eelt the people before the
Council tonight should be allowed to move into their homes, bu[ felt they
would hnve the aeme prableme she ie having once they did move in. She
asked for a solution nmw that the r Dore has 4een made 4y Nr. Sullivan.
She commended Jerry Grant, Bu Lldinge0ff ic1el, for hl• award and fos hla
efforts in helping them.
Tom Aohl, 8xecutive Director of the BIA, stated they wmt to help with the
Nordic eitue[ion, and have had meetings with staff about thin. Ns added
they would do whet the City Council would like than to do.
City Council Minutes
April 4, 1990
Fags 4
MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Alexander to declare an emergency addition
to the agenda for the purpose of considering a modification to the resolution
with respect to the subject tract. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Alexander that if Nordic cap paves the last
eight feet width of asphalt, and corrects the west aide drainage issue, and the
houses are in an acceptable condition like any other tract with respect to
acceptance. that they release up to fifteen. o_ _. ass .`.ocses, the order to he
determined, leaving twelve houses to be he1d,A which could be considered
deyendiny rr prouraea on cna nyuverr ie.. ... e... ..____.. __rr!^^
unanimously,~"6-0 ,~
Mayer Snout sal led a recess at 8:56 p.m. The meeting was called back to order
d~ ~.V7 li. lll• with any ma,6C/e1a JL ,.p111,V t1 IICVVartC.
• Ii
D CONBEMP CALTMDAA
01. Approval of Warrant e, Register Noe. 3/21/90 end 3/21/90; and Payroll
ending 3/39/90 for the total amount of $2,764,465.44.
D2. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off Sele Begs fi Winer T 6 N Harker b
Deli, Nghia Thi and Tang Van Do, 9319 Foothill Boulevard, /lA.
u~. arconoirc neverage Application for On Sale Beet fi Wine Eat irtg Place foz
unnamed reeteurant type business, Dan and Vaneaea Aahtan, 8671 Base Line Avenue.
D4. Approval to authorize Che Advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bida" for
the Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract far Landscape Maintenance
Aeaeeame nt District No. 6 to be funded by Account Nos. 48-4130-6027 and 45-4120-
6028.
RE SOLVTION N0. 90-132
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO
CUCAHONGA, CALI PORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECI PICATI0N9 FOR
THE "LANDSCAPE AND IARICATION MAINTENANCE CONTRACT POR
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6", IN SAID CITY
AND AVTRORI2ING AND OIFECTINO THE CITY CI.ERE TO ADVERTISE "'O
RECEIVE BIDS
D5. Approval of Article 8 Claim Tranaportatior. Punde for Pfacsl Year 1989/90.
D6. Approvnl for the expenditure of 5175.00 for en advartleamant in the Ne-
Tip Annual Conference program, to be funded from Account No. 01-4122-6028.
D7. Approval to authorize destruction of city recarde which era no longer
required under Ooveznment Code Section 34090.
City Counetl Hinutee
April 4, 1990
Page 5
RESOLUTION NO. 90-133
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTFIORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY
RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUTAEO AS PAOVIOEO
VNDEA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090
__. _eval _., actor. ,. rea,.lutio.-. ir. -npro Of -.ate le3i-' or, protect:
the ability of,local government to adopt building etandardsawhichLUare more
stringent than those adopted by the state fire marshal and state houeinq law.
RESOLUTION NO. 90-134
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO
CUCAMONGAr CALIFORMA, TO SUPPORT SH 1830 (GREEN) AND AB 2666
~:::,.... ::~ Ce. .. ..u___.-.__.... _.-._ ..___ _~____ T~+~ AHILITY OF
CITIES, COUNTIES AND `FIRE m•DISTRICTSw TO ADOPT BUILDING
STANDARDS NHICH AR8 MORE STRINGENT TRAM THOSB ADOPTED BY TN6
STATE PIRB HAASHAL AND STATE HOUSING LAW
D9. Approval to deai9nate the Stegmeier House, located at 7050 Btiwanda
Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, ee an Historic Landmark (LD 90-01), APN 227-101-13.
RESOLUTION NO. 90-135
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TFQZ CITY OP RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANOMARA 9D-O1
THEREBY DESIGNATING THE STEGMEIER HOUSE AND BARN, LOCATED AT
7050 ETIWANDA AVENUE, RANCHO CUCANONGA, AS AN HISTORIC
LANDMARX
n10. Approval of Parcel Map 13108, located scuth o£ 24th Street at Wardman
Bu Llock Road, submitted by Caryn Company (APN 226-111-02).
RESOLUTION NO. 90-136
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF TN& CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGAr CAL IFOANIA, APPROVING PARCEL HAP NO. 13108
D11. Approval to annex Tract 13886 and Parcel Map 11394, located at the
northwest corner of Baaa Lina Ro:tl and Etiwanda Avenue, to Landacapa Nsintenene9
9tst tier No. 2, anbmitted by T_!:e 9armahian Cctapary.
RESOLUTION NO. 90-137
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF TNY CITY OP RANCHO
CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OB CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPB MAINTENANCB DISTRICT NO. 2 POR TRACT
13806 ANp PARCEL NAP 11394
City council Minutes
April 4, 1990
Pages 6
D 12. Approval of the Enviro(wental Initial Siudy Porte I and II for the
Carnelian Street Storm Drain, Street Rehabilitation and Widening from San
Bernardino Aoad to north of Roberde Street.
AESOLUTION NO. 90-138
A RESOLUTION OF THH CITY COUNCIL OF TH8 CITY OF RANCHO
CUDAMONOA, CALi-r ORNIA, i,PFfiD'+Iw.+ ^•HE E:ti ZR~.'xgYTA:. ....T:AI.
STWY ANO ISSUANCE OF A CATHGORICAL 6XSMPTION FOA THE
CARNELIAN STAEHT STORM DRAIN AND 9TRHHT IMPROVEMENTS FRON SAN
BERNARDINO ROAD TO NORTH OP RO3HRD5 STREHT
D 13. Approval to award and authorization fot execution of contract jm 90-050)
for Rocheeter Avenue Parkway Improvement Proj eci, located 142 Eeet south of
Chervil Street, to eopark Enterprises for the amount of $331,114.00 (5315,346.50
plus Si contingency), to be funded with Seautification Punde Account No. 21-
4647-8935 (PY 89/90 and FY 90/91).
014. Approval to award and authorization for execution of contract (CO 90-003}
for Milliken Avenue Median and Gateway Improvement Project locnted from Fourth
and Sixth Streets to Volley Crest Landscape for the amount of $434,590.00
(5613,395.13 plus Sa contingency), to be funded with Beautification Punde
Account Noe. 21-4647-3814 and 21-4647-3719 (FY 39/90 and FY 90/91).
015. Approval to award and authorization for execution of contract (CO 90-OS1)
for Amethyst Street Nldening, Area II, Storm Drain, Phase I, Improvement Project
located enet of Amethvet Avenue, north of 19th Serest to Highland Avenue to
Kershaw Construction for the amount of $267,611.00 (5243,233.75 plue l0i
contingency), to be funded from Drainage Pund Account No. 23-4637-8865 and TDA
Article B Fund No. 12-4637-8905 (FY 89/90).
016. Approval to award end execute n Professional Sarvicen Agreement (CO 90-
052) between the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga and Centemial Civil Eng!neers for the
preparation of a Project Report for Foothill Boulevard Implementation Program,
Phase I, from Grove Avenue to Lion Strwt, excluding the Southern Pacific
Railroad Vnderpaee. The not-to-exceed fee of $204,126.00 glue 101 contingency
will be footled from Redevelopment Agency Punde, Account No. 13-50300.
D17. Approval to execute the Construction and Maintenance Agreement (CO 90-053)
between Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Atchison, Topeka and Soots Pa
Railway Company (A.T. 6 5.P. CO.) fOr the proposed Milliken Avenue Cride
SeuaratiJn at the A.T. & S.F. Aaliway crossL-,7 dacignasad FUC f:c. 2-95.EE rcrth
of Sixth Street.
city council Minutes
April 0., 1990
Page 7
RESOLUTION NO. 90-139
A RESOLUTION OF TIC CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF AANCRO
CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ANO BXECUTING TH8
CONSTROCTION AND MAINTENANCB AGREEMENT BETWEEN TAE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONCA AND THE ATCBISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FS RAILWAY
COMPANY POR THE PROPOSED MILLIRHN AVENUE GItAOB SEPARATION AT
THE A.T. fi S.P. RAIiwA'i UROSSiNG DESLGFATHD -rDC ::0. 2-9S.OS
NORTH OP SIXTH STREET
Oltl. wpprovaa or cne nails ncc nyc<m~.e.a ~..-..- (CC =- _-- ---- ••-- ..
proposal to implement the use of the Mille Act-to reduce property tax on- the
property locatetl at 7050 Etiwanda Avenue, APN 227-101-13.
R25oLUTION NO. 90-140
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP TNH CITY OP RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A HILLS ACT AGREHMENT
(ARTICLE 12, SECTION 50280 OF TFffi CALIPORNIA OOVHRNMENT CODE)
POR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7050 BTIWANDA AVENVE
D19. Approval to award and execute a Professional Sarvlcae Agremaent (CO 90-
055) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Jay Rim Engineers, Incorporated,
to prepare de6ign Flans, apecitications and estimntes fez Azea IV Archibald
Storm Drain, Phase lA and 18 for a fee not to exceed $96,749.00 plus 101
contingency to bs funded from Drainage Pund, Accoun[ No. 23-4837-8947 (lA)r and
23-6637-8948 f1H1.
D20. Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 3 (CO 87-164) with 9SI
Consultants, incorporated, to provide additional engineering services for
Etiwanda/son Seveine Area Master Ylan of Drainage. The Change Order ie for the
total amount of $18,748.86 to hying the contract total to $103,748.86 to be paid
from the Etiwanda Drainage Fund, Account No. 19-4637-8766.
D21. Approval of Summazy Vacation Of a portion of Liberty Street, Map,
execution of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, and ordering the
Annexation to Landscape Maintenance DietricC No. 1 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 2 for Ttact 13898r located et the northweet
corner of Lemon and London Avenuae submitted by earnfs Hi:rahl and Jowph Say.
9ESOLUTION NO. 40-141
A RESOLUTION OP TN8 CITY COUNCIL OP TNB CITY OP RANCHO
CUCAMONCA, CALIPOANIA, APPROVING 2MPROVEMENT AOAEEMENT,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AOREEl7ENT POR ENCAOACRlRNT INTO CITY
EABEMHPT OR AIOHT-OP-NAY, AND PINAL NAP OD TRACT NO. 13898
City council Minutes
April 4r 1990
Page 8
RESOLUTION No. 90-142
A RESOLUTION OF THA CITY COUNCIL OF TAE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VP.CATZON OF A
PORTION OF LIBERTY STREET
RESOLUTION NO. 90-143
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
CVCAMONGA, CALIFOAN IAr ORDERING THS ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
............. ... _-.-_-.__ ._.__.___.n..rrs n___.._._ .._. _ ._._ ______
LIGHTING HAINTENANCEnDISTRICT NOS. 1TANDT2 FOR TRACT^13898{
D22. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and
Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance DS wr.l ,.. y_ _ _ _
Liyhtiny naintannoee District Noe. 1 and 6 for Tznet 11428, Socated easterly-of
Center Avenue between Church Street and Foothill Houlevard submitted by QBM
Companies,
RESOLUTION NO. 90-164
A RESOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CSTY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING 2NPAOVEMENT AORBENENT AI4D
Z7M1PROVEMENT SECURITY FCA TRACT NO. 11428
RESOLUTION NO. 90-145
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIPOANIA, ORDERING TAE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OISTAICT NO. 3 AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR TILICT 11428
D23. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and
ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance Dletrict No. 3 and Streek
Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 end 6 for CUP 88-38, located on the weer
aide Of Haven Avenue between Hillside Road find Carzazi 9treei eu~itted by
Hillside Community church.
RESOLUTION NO. 90-146
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THR CITY OF RANCHO
CDCAMOFGA, vv^Fti.i FGHH2A, APPRv7iNG IHPRG'vBNBRS ACREEI{SIY'T ANC
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. BB-38
RESOLUTION NO. 90-147
A RBSOLUTION OP TH6 CITY COUNCIL OF TF1E CITY OP RANCHO
CUCANONOA, CALIFORNIA, ORDBRING TH6 ANNEXATION OP CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LAND8CRP6 MAINTENANCE DIeTA2CT NO. 3 AND STNi6T
LIOHTINO MAINTBNANC6 DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 FOR CONDITIONAL U86
PSAMIT 88-38
City Cmuneil Minutes
April 4, 1990
Page 9
D24. Approval of a Supplement to a previously approved Improvement Agreement
of Tract No. 13851, located north of Wilson Avenue, we et of Deer Creek Channel,
for Systems Fee Credit and Reimbursements for the Wilson Avenue Crossing
Structure of Deer Creak Channel, submitted by Pacific International Development,
Incorporated.
RESOLUTION NO. 90-148
A RESOLUTION OF TXE CITY COUNCIL OF TH8 CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SUPPLEl~NT FOR THE
PAEVIOVSLX APPROVED IMPROVEMENT AGAEEMBNT OF TRACT NO. 13351
D25. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extena ion for Tract 132'0
located on the northwest corner of Church Street and Milliken Avenua, submitted
by Western Prapea'E tan.
RESOLUTION NO. 90-149
A RESOLUTION OF THH CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INPR0VEH6NT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY BOR TRACT 13270
D26. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13271
located on the rort`.west corner of Terra Vista Parkway and M±li iken Avenue,
submitted by Lewis Homer.
RESOLUTION NO. 90-150
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMHNT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION ANU IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOA TRACT 13271
^27. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13273
located on the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Mountain Viow Drive,
submitted by Western Propertiee.
RESOLUTION NO. 90-151
A RESOLUTION OF T!18 CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY OP RANCHO
LTICAMONCA, CALIPORNZA, APPROVING IMPROVBMBNT AGA66M6NT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT BECURITY POR TRACT 13273
D23. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement 6xtonsion fO! TreCt 13280
Landscape, located on the north Bide of Baee Line Road betWaen Milliken Avenue
and Rochester Avenue, submitted by William Lyon Company.
RESOLUTION NO. 90-152
A RESOLUTION O! THE CITY C0IR7C IL O- TH6 CITY O! W1NCNO
CUCANONOA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AOI16ElBNT
8XIRNSLON AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY POR TRACT 13280
City Council Hinutse
April 4, 1990
Page 10 '
D24. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Bxtension Eor Tract 13283
Landscape located on the northwest corner of Sale Line Road and Rochester
Avenue, submitted by William Lyon Company.
RESOLUTION NO. 90-153
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COVNCIL Op THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFOIin 1A, APPROVING TMPRO'veMeh'i AGRznHERI
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TIUCT 13481
D30. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement 8xtenelon for Tract 13444
located on the south aide of Fairmont Way between Milliken Avenue and Kenyon
Way, submitted by William Lyon COmpaay. IYE11 REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY
COVNCILNEMSSA RVQORT.
RESOLUTION NO. 90-154
A RESOLUTION OF TFIE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO
CCCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREE!ffiNT
EXTENSION AND IHPROVB!ENT 38CVRI^aY POR TRACT 13444
D31. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13753
Landscape located on the north aide of Save Line Road between Milliken Avonue
and Rochester Avarua, submtted by William Lyoa Company.
RESOLUTION NO. 90-155
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TNfi CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGRSEHENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13753 LANDSCAPE
032. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Mflp 10295
located On Elm Avenue between Spruce Avenue and Church Street, submitted by
Lewis Homes.
ABSOLUTION NO. 90-156
A RESOLUTION OP THS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVINO IMPROVBlRNT AGRREMBNT
EXTENSION AND IHPROVEMENT SECVRITY POR PARCEL HAP 10495
n33. Anprovai rn execute Improvement Agreement Extension £OZ far22i Hay L1C30
located on the northeast corner of Poothlll Boulevnrd and Haven Avenue,
submitted by Lewis Development Company.
RESOLUTION NO. 90-157
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP T!R CITY OP RANClIO
COCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, APPAOVINO IMPROVEMENT AOR[EMENT
$XTeNSION AND IMpROVBNENT SECURITY POR PARCEL MAP 11030
City Council Ninutae
April 4, 1990
Page 11
D34. Approval to accept Improvement a, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion
for Tract 12870 Storm Drain, located on the north side of Highland Avenue
between Eaet Avenue and 8tiwanda Avenue.
Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $774,000.00
Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond {Street) 5 77,400.00
RESOLUTION NO. 90-150
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL O! TH8 CITY OF RANCHO
CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS POR
TRACT 12870 STORM DRAIN AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE
OF COMPLETION FOA THE WORR
D35. Approval to accept Improvements, release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond for
Tract 13059 located on the west aide of Fairmont Avenue between Highland Avenue
and Base Line Road.
Haint enance Guarantee Hood (Street) $ 50,000.00
D36. Approval to accept Improvement e, release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond for
Tract 13192 located on the norm aide of Terra Vleta Parkway, east of Spruce
Ave.-.ve.
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) S 15,800.00
D37. Approval to accept Improvements for the Alta Lome Storm Drain (A.D. 84-
2), Contract No. E9-025, an crnoplete, release the bonds and euthorire the City
Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion".
R%SOLUTION NO. 90-159
A ABSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TAB CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TH% PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS POR
ALTA LOMA STORM DRAIN (A.D. 84-2 ), CONTRACT NO. 89-025, AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OP A NOTICE OP' COMPLETION POR TXE HOAR
MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Brown io ayprove the bnlance of the
consent calendar with the exception of item D30. Motion carried unanimously,
5-0
• R • R R R
DISCUeBION O! ITKM D30. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement %xteneion for
Tract 13444 located on the south aide of Fairmont Way between Milliken Avenue
and Kenyon Way, eubmitteQ by NL11 tam Lyon Compnny.
Councilmembar Buquet ststed ha had this removed for diecuselon Mcauee ha
thougnt this wee a trnet that had bean granted a previous extension and wanted
clarit icetion on thnt, because at thn time Lt won n potential for property
City Council Minutes
April 4r 1990
Page 12
ownership transfer and they needed additional time, and if this was the same
tract he hoped it had b3en clearly communicated to the development interest that
we don't want to continue granting extensions.
Rues Maguire, City Engineer, stated he did not feel this ie the one diecueaed
at length, but if the Council wished, it could be pulled off and xeeearched.
councilmember Buquet stated he did not want to do this, but felt the Council
had given a previ c•_e e..f east c., «., tF;e •.q..« ~..,, mow-.. .w^~ .e_' ___ Pen •e,e
would be handled before it would be neceaeary to grant any further'exteneione.
RESOLUTION NO. 90-154
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF lUNCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMBNT SECDRITY POR TRACT 13444
MOTION: Moved by Baguet, seconded by Brown to approve Reeolutlon No. 90-154.
Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
B. CONSENT ORDINANCES
Nc Items Submitted.
• . + . w
F1. CDNSIDEAATION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIPIC PLAN AMENDI~NT 90-01 - CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend ills PoOth111 BOUleveid Spec if io Flan
by adding pharmacy use in the Specialty Commercial District of Subereae 1, 2,
and 3; clarifying the intent of wordings in several areas of the Specifie Plnn
text for consistency purposee; clarifying the Development District and atsndarda
for the area at the end of San Bernartlino Road in 6ubarea 2; and modifying the
plant palette for the Poothill Boulevard landscaped median ielend. (CONTINUE
TO APRIL 18r 1990)
Jack Lam, City Hanager, eteted a continuance ie being requested until April 18,
loon due to fur^_.her ~.g ' nd Jerti e~^q _~___~~..__.
HOTIONI Hoved by Baguet, seconded by Alexentler to contlnus the Item to April
18, 1990. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
• • ~ .
City Council Minutes
April 4r 3990
Page 13
F2. CONSID^eRATION OF AMENDMENT TO ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT ORDINANCE NO. 290 -
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to Chapter 5.12 of the Municipal Code
modifying regulations for entertainment permits. Staff report presented by
Nancy Fong, Sr. Planner.
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public heating. There being no response, the
public hearing was closed.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 290-A.
ORDINANCE NO. 290-A {first reading)
AN ORGINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 5, CHAPTER 5.12 OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODB TO MODIFY REGULATIONS
CONCERNING ENTERTAINMENT PERMITS
MOTZON: Moved by august, seconded by Wright to waive fu 11 reading and set
second reading of ordinance No. 290-A for the April 18, 1990 meeting. Motion
carried unanimouelyr 5-0
O. PUHLIC HEARINGS
It should be notetl that Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, le Pt the
......,. s... .r.e a: e..,.v e,,,., s ..,,.. ~,
G3. CONSID RAT ON O MEDI N O ENIN S D L NG WITHIN MEDIANS THE
TERRA VZSTA PLANNED COMMUNITY - An appeal of the Planning Commiesion'e decielon
to deny a median opening on Church street between Weet Blm Avenue and Spruce
Avenue. (Continued Fme March 21, 1990)
Jack Lam, City Manager, etatetl there ie a letter from a reeident, Marnie B.
Petrovick, to 6e included in the record, which will be kept on tale in the Clty
Clerk's Otfice.
Mayor stout asked that a copy be made for the City Council and be made part of
the record for this Lt em, and that he would share it wish the Council tonight.
staff report presented by Brett Horner, Associate Planner.
Mayor Stout stated that according to the diagram on the wall, it has the orange
dote that say those median breaks are to be deleted, end asked what that meant.
Brett Horner, Associate Planner, stated that at the Marsh 14 Planning Commission
meeting, when the Planning Ccmmlesion adopted the policy Eor the minlmum median
lengths, they also directed staff to correct some of the axleting medians that
do not meat the policy on Terre Vleta Parkway and Church Street.
City Council Minutes
April 4r 1990
Page 14
Mayoz Stout asked who would be responsible for paying to remove the medians and
having them re-landscaped.
Russ Maguire, City Engineer, stated that it would depend on the particular area
and the development statue of that area.
Councilmember Brown asked how much the people will be paying for the renovation
of the medians that do not meet Lhe policy.
..__ : Y.agu v-t, City miyineer, statetl he did not know the answer to this at the
moment.
Councilmember Buquet expressed concern for making someone go back and filling
in the medians retroact ively.
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the Council were:
Don Thompson, Lewis Homes, referred to a letter doted March 13, 1989,
signed by 8111 Silva, at that time the Caputy City Engineer, regarding the
Church Street medians master plan which was approvod prior to them
et art ing the medians in Church Street, and stated because of this
statement made in the latter, that ie why they are appealing the Planning
Commission's decisicn. Ha also Yeferred to a meeting between Lewis Homes
and City eta Ef whereby they would be allowed one mid-h lock medlar. break
on church and Terra Vista Parkway. He also referred to page 186 of the
agenda which described Commercial/Mixed Uee Access, which he felt was an
.~nn~ .~ of •hn mo..a vi aka Dian Ho ale aaod hiv rnnrorn
about delays in the project because o£ this eiiuai ion~.'a
Fred Aguire, expressed hie opposition to the Planning Commiseion'e
decision. He later referred to a memo dated January 18 from Brad Buller,
City Planner, to Shintu Boee, Deputy City Engineer, regarding proposed
denial of the median break ae St relates to safety, and pointed this out
to the City Council.
Tom Dellaguil 1, Lewis Homes, stated he was the landscape architect for
Lewis Homes, and explained he did not feel Lhe deletion of some of the
trees would ruin the aesthetics of the Landscaping.
There being no further response, the public hearing was closed.
Ma yn~ Cf n~~h of of nA 41~a! ~~-_~ wih1. hFn m-oTnn plannnil re,nnjn L~loa• hho Idea wa0
to get these kinds of problems ironed out in the beginning and then tlesign the
project around it. He felt that now, for come reason, this ie back, BCS through
Ghe process, and Lt woe being decided that it was now not a good Lden to do Lt
that way enymora. He felt It was a good idea to change ecmathing it it raleted
to public safety matters or something like that, but did not ass that Lssus
here. He elated it makes him think that the Planning Commission wesn•t carelul
enough when they designod the project. He felt thLe hurts the craditebility of
the people who approved the project in the beginning, but added he would not
appzovw this now as Lt was eubmLtted then.
City Council Ninutee
April 4, 1990
Page 35
Councilmember 0uquet stated he felt when Chia project came before the Council
it was their intent to takes the traffic. that normally ends up on the main
etraetsr to bring it in ae soon ae you could to deal with all the traffic
impacts and internalize the whole process. He stated he felt it bothered Terra
Vista and Victoria when there ie a tendency to bring things back to the Council
on the planned communities, which was well intended, but the Council should keep
in mind there was a very large picture font was planned and for them not to eub-
optimize too much.
Councilmember Brown referred to the policy before them and the staff report
tlated February 14, page 3, where it was stated to the Planning Commission that
they have three alternatives. She etatad her preference was number 2, which
states to continue to review proposed median openings on a project-by-project
..ae.n ihcwyil ti.e Eechniue. en.. ..aaly:..a. a.. car.-.---__ r-uas:.
Councilmember Alexander stated he felt the public safety iaeue previously
Drought up is important ae they relate to median breaks.
Councilmember Hclght etatad she did not think a maintenance district fee should
be tagged on tc some of these people. she felt maybe Lhe Council should be
looking nt the Planning Crnmiesion'e whole policy, not just one sepect of it.
Hayoz Stout pointed aut the issues v»re: 3) Terrs Vista median openinq, 2)
this specific appeal and policy affect ne it relnten to retrofitting, and 3} if
the Council wants to become involved in the policy itself. He stated he did not
feel the Council was cdnpeieni to discuss the policy issue at tonight's meeting,
_ _ 1. e- ~:.w lF inn rn•...nll u~n~a ~n Innk aT If.
HeieddedJhe`did'notfeel'that strongly about it.
MOTION: Moved by Wright, eecontled by august to uphold the appeal. Motion
carried unanimously, 5-0.
Mayor Stout pointed out that with the action the Council has taken, staff can
take it ae direction that they were not interested in closing the medians et
this time.
Ruse Maguire, Clty @nglneer, etatad that based on the Council's action they
would go back and amend the map to bring back to the next Council meeting to get
their approval.
Mayor stout felt the Planning Commission should ba made aware of how the City
..vv....~- .'nnla about the ,~diz„ b k : _.
Ruse Meguira, City @ngineer, etatad he understood the direction to bs to set
aside this plan and let it be project-by-project.
Councilmambere Wright end Buquet felt Lf the policy Leaue became a problem, the
Council could get involved at that time.
City Council Minutes
April 6, 1990
Page 16
Councilmember Nrigh! stated she still felt the Council could end up Deinq the
appeal board on median breaks.
Mayor Stout stated the Council is a very strong supporter of tY.e Planning
Commission and the job they are doing, but etatad if he were Bitting on the
Planning Commission at this time, he would disagree with what the policy enid.
He did not want them to get the wrong idea what the Council felt about the
policy.
R R R R R R
A. CITY MANAGBR'S STAFF REPORTS
H1. STATU REPORT ON AAF 2C SIGNAL AT FOOTH R S R
Auee Maguire, City Sngineer, stated this ie a permit project ao that Caltrane•
recent action should not affect this, and that it is on schedule.
Mayor Stout asked if the staff could wriia a Resolution Eor Lhe next agenda
expressing to Caltrans how important this signal wee to the City.
Ruse Maguire, Ciiy Engineer, stated stuff could do this.
Jack Lam, City Hnnager, staced they would 'nave this back for the April 10
egenda.
H2. REPORT ON FLOOD INSVAANCE Staff report pras0nted by Jack Lemr Ciiy
Manager.
ACTION: Report race Lved artd Eiled.
R R Y R• R
;. COVNCIL BOSIffiae
No Items Submitted.
R Y• R R Y
1T0 0TVt~1TI~N ~M tTYYO M
J1. Mayox Stout asked Por the bounty and reward ayetama for graffiti
special iota to come beck at the April 18 meeting.
k R R R R R
City Council Minutes
April 4, 1990
Page 17
R. C0MMVNICATIOM9 PROM T~ POBLIC
R1. Lewis Trout stated ha had sent a leiiar to the City requesting other
information be included in the report on the bounty and reward systems for
9raf£iti.
Mayor Stout stated he would also like to see information on minors involved in
nprnv nai nt inn of araffit;, and the nu rahaai .,,, s ~_____1 i:~ld: cane.
K2. Ron Hutton stated he would like to discuss at the next meeting the
acquisition of 17 acres for a possible park site.
._ cc __~... =~at?A the Council tloee not 1LY.e to talk about nronerty acquieit ions
in~public,•but that Mr. Hutton could discuss Chia with eta £f, antl suggested he
contact Jack Lam, City Manager.
A3. Mayor stout informed the Council of the varlou^ deteile planned for the
July 4th Civic Center/Public Ssfety Pacility Dedication that have bean worked
out by the City Council Subcommittee and staff for thin event.
A4. councilmem6er Baguet suggested a new plan of action regarding Nordic be
worked up.
i ~ 1 • k n
MOTION: Moved by Grown, eecortdad by Alexander to adjourn to Executive Seeeion
regarding pending litigation of the property located at 12659 Base Lins Road.
Motion carried unanimaualy, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 10:15 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams
Clty Clark
Approved:
I I
~ n
°o° '•O
°°
°°°
o
°
°
°
=
P
°
°
°
°
°
°
oo
o Pa
P
e
w•
•
e r
+e
ono
e •
in•
.ae
wmiw
nw~
ee o
ew
e
- ~ L ~ n
pOam4VPOmTAONOnah P
r~m
enaOwaNlPmol
N
_
y
=lowwye.r PNnu+m~~ _
~+ ~ ~ ~ .~ .~ w v •• w •1 r• N N w P N r A N
J• ° w
•3•
•
>•
~•
i
m
~
~
~
N
N A
r r r
r rrr r •
Nar•N PO m•Nah OP MNA•NahbPOwNT•AahePOwNA•N a••iP °••NA•N
• •••• ••NN Ow aNaaa aa PPM}h>.h hhbOeiOloo!•PPPPPPPPPPOOOOOo
•Z
>w
NN
TTTT
Tw11
A AATA •
AA 1•i•1•11•.••V11111111•111•••IINNNNNN
AAAAATAATTTTTATTTTATAAATTTAAAATTATT
•`: Oi •1 •••• 1• 11•11 11 11•1••••IY•1•IV••i•1••••••••••••1••
> <
I U 1 1<1 1• I b l I • • V
•
•
y
mW }
• Th
NN N O
wO!
Oh ° a S
N
N
h a° V i Na N S
•
N N N •PLL •Z • • I N \ h• Y <
• •
6
P
i
YQ• :J
N m\
•hLL W
•Z A 1 V a° J
•
W
V
W
W
< N J 6 N
\SW } \
N~ ~~ •
i
00
Y • J
P/• i MP •
!
••
i f
•
•YF
LL a
WV W N WW \W Y LL••P
YA
O
O O
VV V SVW
VUVZ V
VZ
V YM
VW VYNy N N Z N Z
V•N•
Vi2ill t JK N
W NV i JNNN
`N;
i V VNV• V
Z yOJ
V
V W
VoPV \ J•
Vi
=e O N O
j Zi
'J J <
2 YKO N Z\= „Y Z O• h2 ZPh
NWY >
MO N
M eW•D ee
pf •• I \ W e • J}f ~
~
iJZ \i fY
JJ W O WM V VP
Y _
~J~
W
h
lV °
Z
NN J
b
Z
She I N O o O Nf
" ~ W•
V
I
1
••
W
w 2•
1
N
•P
}+
iei W W N
~j
i 1 ets
A heoe< »su aJal PWNW
s
L
u ~ i
f W o<Y
ON ~LLW=e Nioi ~=o
f00
Z •• •
I y
f •
.
W F ON
°F
W i
O WLL iNNW) ZY MM1IN hN 6 !NJ J j
V°Y`NNO7W WfV OOVVJ< NpN \fOMW
W I„ D = N F
JWY yVIOV yUf NZ WSJJOiWaM•hPYYNe
LL
}Yi A
<'J V
eY
V W W
JJi =
7N hF_NN
i W1l N
Y WUfZKaS •'
>N • Jt0
V
•Y
•N Y i Y N Ni
„ V
N J
W O
W SMhMO Ni<Y ~WJiN<WJW< JS
NiW}NhTZN
WD
YNiiOtN<W FOUS hKNVO
•WI1 y h t 6 M h i ~
~
OWOON I
WYZOWNeNY > >'
w
W6
V
LL
u •O• l
V u N J
N1 V
W ~
~
W
Y
K< f W Z•N60 YIl°°t OOYULLILWO•
0•Z J •WY>W\1<Z°ps 061E KSZ ZSN
:W• V
V • LL
S 2 O S>
IYNI
Z h6QSMW}<MSFWNY~JitlJVWNw4 ODfw}1. ••~O
VWNNlK42VthLLYhZJWWf NZN>121LWOi22NLL
h• : u !
F 9•ZMUWMJfILLJW< »WNNf WY•WWWWWw~J W•
~
„ > ° O °YV i ONUhW•iNOe>N~tlOOONihVtlFYY<Y>V6e6h
F
~ N
F
~•i[ O
i i F
• • j vi ) z u
t
w w .
.N ~t s w i ~n w
w
° ao
i i
s
De
F r
z
N
N J
V
V N ~
•
F _
V NY l
u N
uV
2wu
•
W
J}
h O
q`N
W YF'n r
~ i MUS MZ N
M 2
Y
• tl W W° h 70
N N ~~} W fWN
W OW Ot JJ W•f W Y Y
• W F ii W WOV ZNhY •l • K} NS N < h N
Yfi
~
•
• N }~ i D
JWf NLNYN » t• SVCH
LLFD JMNO
•
Y
K
• ~
• • `2 WWK Np Z•ZWN S J«~V
JW~~Y>KNWW JNyK<LL••}j ~}<j }
Z 6 N N6
J° i YYWN O•NNi92iJJ W°iYNe SNWiNWipYJ
• I Y f pp
~ h
VWWM
~
W
MUWN
S
~°l
fW
• } O •
~S _
N V
f W
Ip
Oih>W
•
~ NOJV
IN
O
h
7NYWSW VO JOJIOZ i YN• h>f eF
I
• • Z
N E W L WOhOfK2ihVWW
i W<YON M•[i Y2J O N
• •
Z
~ Y
V YY •D
YOSS N _
M1 MNf••YNN • NYfK JWYFiYOWM•
> iIi-YV
M
iY2 hhWiJO f
WNiYYMJ
K
K
:W~ 6 f N O OZZN V y
iI1
y
a
•
•WMN~1tfYOVVWNJV
VI•M WOMOhYLYV}~•~Nij
i• M W : < J JJUW Y
2e}~•MWWNY
Jf•DONiOJ22 <f•ihVi2•M
• •
2 l Z = OM•J • ttW
YOYJiZN JJ9p7 •<YWiiZNN000Y0
• • J e u i •U•• J N«f «•<f eee°OeeOeeVUYYYYYYYYYYYYV
• •
•Y•
•°•
•
a
P
O «
N
P
1•>•N
NPNn
O
1
hT•<ehPNaPTTwh•hwNNTT •~>e il11MVM e•N
NPwOeNaPM
w
T
PI
I
NI•
eS
~
•D•
O
T
N °
^
NOe1
N N
>
PP}Ta
A
a a
PPF
hMa
nle •w •OPK
00°'IMN° e00 T
e°•
•i: N T TT T»
ry
NA N A•1 N AAA•IM TT ATA TT
r •W
~>~
/
NNNONpOpNaONNONdNfOpOOTPOwOwOONOOxOeaOAOCPNNhOOwN00
YN'+OPSCNNSOV VVrtNVrtvvNTYNO~LOOp000NnnaNnfana0
YNabbaNNTNPNPew•OAPTNxOVOAO.^NwN NNNNAONOTOPwaNaNPNO
fu
0
if\
uw~
Sly
•lMw
JO
u
W•
Y•
O•
p•
•O•
•2•
•¢.
i.
w
~~
X011
~. J N ~
JaNOPOMNAaAahePOwNAiNaNOPOMNAaNaMePOwNAaNahOPOwNAiNO
wMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNAAATAAAAAAi1a111a111NNNxNNN
¢peoe..w..n NNNNN NNNNxnNNNNNxNNNxNNNNN
>TTATwN11i1AAAAAATAMATAATTATTTAA.i11.ITAAATTTAAAAAAAAATATAAA
011<Ilaaaaaalaa'Iaaaiaaaaalalaaaaa111a1a1V1aaaaaaaaaa
u • .~. :• • aeli..°.i
V Oi NFfb\ 6 NS
• \h Q aNb>w N i FUN
w s u~•W.+ i ~ e au z
m¢ " wW aezwNNwN W •eo sp r
b b PU OOMMiW W W IINP. ON NZO
NA i z eY wNWZYia~ aPnp . ~i-N
wiz wa zNiWW n axAw zW ..
ON_.NN UO \ bN <V b ~ U6
¢•b\ M NN • tl i J >b MNW
F NF b btlJ JtlV¢! W O i b{ w JsJ
aJ z !YO zh ees. N! is )~z
IU WjNrt ~ J iW N~WOWW
fW W.U1V1 { OMZ bw6 NNfxO YY OONICOWwL iL <:y NJLL
i ZS O W AW»b'J• MUaeNZU J ~ n.~~
ON W1061„Ni2: 'JW a0_'
J< 7f Y:NVJ 6=N~ 0=00e t<ZN bWi x_O.N! 670 J IL Oh •
a iWNj iOWF iw02 a UJNI AVOwNieOOW .Ie O
JJZ¢MVJW)ONN ZOiNJ yi NLVVY_N NNNY.L¢O ~jbi SL11
NLLOa IW>LVpZZfNWwZiWNlINbN dub iffNWUWUWPWbZNMUUxpN
W WV!•VfpWf pJ<60NJ6 WILN< !\ZNJJJ u ¢Z¢ 6:N b2bWN>
WONZ ZMUy V JZW ObNW<wUUUb N b f{OZ6
bf N< W L Ob WW¢ ~uY!> ii> UWNW2FZZW..M6VNYW=
WhWVO1WViJOFWN~h~.OSNYnO<z.YUbWiLil~S.U.Fw NYOiZWxNSUU2M
2WZZlJaf¢WMM¢¢Ipl.¢JO.ZiI=LCYWM>tli1JNZLLLLILZJNIw.L>Y<VJUbOWih
U6Z.<iiiOONO¢LNN6WZN!¢0006WNVTNtLY6RViCNSO1b JKL6ZNOJ3
L
a
~_•
i•
O•
O•
Z•
>•
LLu W V F N
.o s o °u
~u u u
N 2 O Z
f N O < N ~. _
~h Gh ~
iUJ uU OJ Y i J hi N SON
Yo No o N u N .o z
- ss ~:
We
WL f W F N¢ Zh fF01i Z ICLL
U tW N pW M h <W NJ NOJ 2 WOhO O W VJN
O 2JJ 7J O JJ •Vf 1{U yyY JV N<.[
NS OJ ¢VOYN FW NJW .S • SS Wf p 'J h JJ. WNN
NV< ¢fN0< iW¢h<Zf• 1..6Y 2 O>_ON V W Jtlz
O NON ULhWi h2< f• 6 U!N W ¢ W M: ~ OY NO>
W SNWW<W O<f2 > VMJS¢>JW• Of >WN~w N f 1 iN
•NOZ ZaWiMUN>!N>fVOY uW Y NJOOUNOSiN W_V
t JF6ai9JVMNiWOY •ffYZfY •iWiOh e0i>OWOY.Vi r~jw~j YWiLeJZO 1Wiy ~
V'Jh0!•<LWiNOA.>iiY •MW~NYV,NiJi~U~=fOJ 6JOJ~~V •WOOYiNZ
NNfiON <iWJ NJ OfMOi ~>W la JMpphO~~~i tyy JyyWJZ SY.V •WWWf
.[:I OiOZYYZNW\1~~INi~Yi.V WNY2000WhOwJ iWWW~uS OMYiZiiM!
W >JC6iVNJLiNU00<tISNOf iOZN>00 ZfZZiiV2N¢hMOViY!
OOOOOpO00WWWWWLLLIII ZVUUUU2LS2SYMT199ZlZYZYYJJJjJl6ii
~PNA~•eOANNPNNeOP~l~~T~aennAOwih~l..NA•aNNwaNw I1N11i Nh
NNw1~~NY.NM^NN^=yN000NOwO0 awMP FlOONwANTNONN^NTNNNN
J TTT T A.. ATNN AwT.. AwAA
)Y oMN..00PO.O.l Y0100iON000mp01mOnN00000000N00<NwOOMThON000V
Z•
wpN ~ pj0 mO~Nrym
NO'I .. NNOmry_N~)VNNOmh m iNeOVNONm wVrv
N+mN u w n F w ~n .n N V w_ N r y w N.~N
!f\
~fN
V°\
ii
qN¢
)JO
V
Jx
xOY
Y
Y
Y
Y
YiY
Yf:
Y
YOY
YO 11
YWY
Yi 11
O JNmINdhmPOwNmiNtlhmP O..NmINd)°PONNmIndpOPmQ NOeIONV
ddmVtltlVVVOh)hhh))M)h°°OmOmmmO pPppppmnam
NNPNNnNNNNNN .°dtldtltldd
wni°n u°. NnnNTmmm1~11n.~N pT±NNmmmpmTpmNmm NIN.I AIT iNiIAA pl.l: pl.lpmmmm+j
OIIIIIIIIIIilliiil •i11V1111111111i1ii1•i1 •i1111V
W
V m p m m _ mm
P aP2
W PO
f LL{N Im JNU
• 1 ) ~+ d W T
• NAO N \• N 1 S
n0 i0 O
Zm LL IN Jp V LLhU
fi Yir PJ mVr < ..\
Y Z! P li
JW WJ • °ai W NJ
<v° AJ • i
fJ6JV)i JV t ZN O wJ2)
LzNSNN I s`u .h.. i r I
IZ OJZN J i eJi i
NiNW RwJ ONm W )N\ U LLSi
YOw •WWO 1Nw )IW )J
mZV OUa •Y.O h iN Z ZNw
Ziw NJ i N WWambZmO huiu ~{N
rPJ V _ i{i2J)miWJy~N Np ~rWLL~fN
Jzi.i ~arowrlen ilaNSJLL NaN J za sszWZN
LLNUwmNnraLLOO i)oa <m{ q~ four.
mr.e)VO Oii2W W2 iWN{wWNNO°)Zf hlL J<_WWNN)wZ
`UOMPWYi~rLLnMwZ YLL<4`Uw`OOW)m.`iO ULLWZ ¢)~ )W Ytin
OrOiFUO~NwY >r~TJUKOgaO~LL2WLLLLLLghYV Or6gi02iwULL~ifrO
)Wmf N00)h0 WiUCi)fW OSr6iW IO Zafi)WVVLLwZyON(SVSWWh
fN .S NVwVM{Mflf NV. JW°IIw.VwOJV Zf N)f
200>)GNmf J<OZV wi)GZ NJJi Wf.[mmT)Nm J2
mwlJNrYW mOZIrJ i0Egr2~iJHN °y.f iLLZwZEJ
VN SW)`NO_W> )>jOwWMWWWWf>WwOW PO)UiOLw)foWJMUN Of
OnJ>NiU> OOZWrVwt(i>OYLLWmmiZONJ>YOf4iZNgOZOidmLLmUwuJ
N y
a N
YY O
Su u r u >
wa N z oyiq ` z
s ~ w h r .u
{VZ JNUS N WOO[W ~~ O J• )JS wuK JC
ChW NE2N >rY _ _h
WJ ZOa• Y ZJ?N ffUa> Rii
U){ IVUN U N„N •LL < OJMJN Oi WMN •JW )_q_
f ~ O W ~ N=iO U <s O• N9tYW iCq NO O
NN M>f ZO JVNY' •ON NiVNf > w~W <>10 >
.s ewwHNer <gi~`wwietia i°Hwiui hhl~ow °m iu~a i i i`~ az
)Sw 01LLL ZNJOVNeiSNJUO 2 >JZN u fOJO JJW<SNh{aNmVY
ENY <tW{WZOV iNNNO1WJ O)O<JY SJSw'1~mm`<VWWSOSOW
W > `NNNJ>MifZONJ90 N<OWS aiOi INUN> Z~JJfOV Oi•
V WOV6aFy~0Or ~Or OON„ 6y WSW WJOOOff O U>
Wi WJJJ s O• fU{~O Ni00 V6f7 fY• _
°SVN{Uf{<N ~gJrJ ESGZZ NII°yN6JNOi 2
•>f° ifffVN JWNJ OON 7q •UONiiUNN)W'JZ •WWwOLLN
a°w)aJO~00MMm{NLLWJVVjOf JWWf~g6ga iiF< tifOJiWOOMO
Ni MNO< VWNYWa hNON~ ' •y SNWWWNWfVN fVf
nVNJLLh:y>J6iV=UUVf UNO~aZ N Jf UWiONV)»OON)ViiiiWV
ifffffiffSZi000Y>6°ZG°°a!W>6Gg666ifiYYiPi°igMNNNNNN
ONN~)VNVNrf)OVVlOV<)A)V)>TNrm°wwmOFV OI°iwh~m)~mpOVnnIN
I.IN m `1.11.INTNTI.I IN.Im w°Mw°mmwrvmTry°INilnw~wT °NIN.INNNmmNNm~NT>NiNN
3
NPN
PN° N
O
OOOMTOpOp NI~OOOTOP
O•
P•
bP^a1NN?Y Ja~OePnT
N
mre
r FNT rIOOMPP wlN OOOnNN
r
•Y• N• NaN M
V NNNTa.IN _
~..` N T N
•Z• r
W•
O~
Z•
a•
POrNTaNahRPOwNTIN n1~OPewNT
Owwwrr•rrrwrNNNNNNNNNNTTmN
nannnannnaanaaannnnannnam
TTTTTTTTTTTNTTTNTTTTT
O•aaVaa+alaaaVaVaaaaVVlaVVa
iS•
V ftlR f
O
u F
i JNr U
~
w
w r f°T/
V PNe
V
11 9NNN
M1 VTa•
Z
e RV°Y W
sN o uaf°°
<h\ r ~r
.phm• fNJMn w2FFF
F
~i° eeeo We~w~ r we°iei r
R~ ~e s (JRRR y
COO w
6a
°
• e JWWW
V
hWp 6 Of\LL
O
SS •
=nn
OONr•rN RJO
NO
zLL0
•O• rr
111 SL
07r NJ6°<TO J'JSJGI 9e
f00 PfWWY• OppJW~
ONVOOMOW WWNW2JSSSrWn
N •p~ ZRNVNO Y\R 1f 6fON/7D'J OR
W
LL
RII JNTprJLLFWT O 6hMLLM1N
O11(NIS SWSW
NNwPOryWW
NO <OtlW YY[R LOS
{p
OFgNHyO>Vri/h ~Of W°FFI~FM2
LL r\O<MN<Ne/J/ZZMrr
V OriOJ6ZUwyMw OyyNSWh~
Y
•Z•
W• YTTnTTM1YMrP3<C<
T40001-~RZ
fV LLUt>VFUYJ •IL>>
/
y11
SRnnhrO~U0YpR6Km<KVZ000G6i
•f
__
_ _
O
.I J.aJ =
9 t°a < W
O Y J
N N
h
iiii 2 •f y J
yNNy •O O
ZUV V O
72 _ M
___
3 rJ
O n
Wr V J}
• IIIIV LL°ZY SV ( 1w
• ___IV OVVy YJNM wpW
S
OO
ON 1L NVWryU pNM Z
• • yNNN/ SJN1lM JMh NWWW
MV WNDOMpRC6 OL.RLRFV
Wp000 O <SSi Nf pfVOWry
i
Ww
WJPJ<9NV( (FiZVRW
w2 FUJO Np
O
p
n1J iZJYO • VSVi~Z7
s
• <
JJJJ/FNtl20Nh~MYU026NfSN
• Nyf//fU RW<VWWWOW<FIM WMS MILD
YUVU
°
h
•(~ °.F
•SLL
'MJJJRVJ
JNJ2JOf
_ r(00000'J ~MOY/«Mff WWWwYp00
• ; NNNNNyNNNFryF>ffTZSL22SSi(S
•
LO• POTTT•1tihRPPaNNNiMpNNPtl~P01
•O•
:W 0~~~~~TN ~NONFmNONNFNNN
!1 Trm TNT~.1 ~T TT Tw
/
• :f:
7
2
`NP
r~
'ua~
=;0
00
mrm
LL.
o~R
\~
011i
O~
~Z•
~m•
R
Z
/_
•i
I10
•O
aI1W
~>
M y Gdpaggpplq
N h OOOOOONO
YfOVPK aNN
pOnpO OnN10A00000NnO0orOOnoNpOOPp
mJ Ouu:
AN «AN«I~NON~O « « Nw hA n«o
G A N n /~ n
i„~{11•JVV•
~NNNOAO«Aa P000«NApPOYNAfNtlwgPO~IN NINtl«OpOANAINarmPO
•InwO~AAAamARaf~Ial•INNNNnNMNNNaalaa<a0<awhhwM>w>whm
aaaaaaatlaaaaaaaaaaaaaatlatlaaaatlatlaaaaaaa
WPAAAAAAA AI AAAANAAAANAAAAAAAAAAAARAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANAA
OAfIV1if• •1IfIIf111111111111111fff1111f11ff11f111f1
1 I 1 1 • • 1 q mu O • •••
N •w f mi N w0
h •tl0 PO 00 V •N U \W
M iA N•A« \m OP A C+ LNU
• TS• •SIW M\ \\ • U\i
O NhOmm
/ •OINP\\
VNV VRV>INI\IIO:
w'v V VWVf>\NH\•IV
\ Uv VYJ Valf~~00Ni
N z i °N .a w.l. ~"unir
~ O `\«hfOONVi
O m / NanN WW\WW
« Il „ VugiifSW
6 \S Yip
m W SM1l 10lMWW\i~
O Z ON NOOLNL
M ~ ;J==V000««
m N N 00»OpOFrm
L 6 WLLOpY.w W.«j\i
U V U J V ff w« t0
O :N__ >
d « ~ OL6f«Y
O fOiSNw~J
> N n R ei fuuiwmuir
u
N W
u W
> r0
?O
N NqW
VI.U
W Z NFL
°d o JW nW :ai
W a ~ Oje WSpMHr
> O Y Mh«p«JOp
J W > 7 O•SgNNOWM•
J J W7 •wN~{Of_
N : YfiWNriWW«
2 V V ~W{mOWVfpU
• N G N J•O>WO«NWL
S iN C i OS qN O« m
{ fN w V AT\~O iq WOMt \
>O p00.O _ •Mi N
< {z r U O~•O>O rOYOV w tl O
N eW_ ~rhwiw N:whoa w i
O V NW iq WgtVi J O W
W JYO« e~WSigW qOW _ NW
iZyOmq Z WN N NN O~nn~ ~ .~ ..~
pitl i!«d •i\oa!_I pw9i {IfZ«U_i_ N
«NWOU WNWOO OS ipi20 2!i jW
«{2 2 h_Sih2• PV«NMOWY Jh• V=
6JOw6 » y 922WN
SO «Il Y.6LL0 SrtW9¢O«000m Y«
aW OM r:{«fWwwWW
>IidGNf Jhigm•mwWw~SirW«ir~•uP{i
« WOYFOSaJW«rw«wWW Mw2JPW1.4NO~NUW
NOJJf_ IwhOJ«NI[«•iR6«w«LL«JmSLL O J
OIwIM oC1-wwnoOCOKwKrUtlJ OVVfFmOOiV
rm20W JO Vh« Z60060ieNOOJVPip O«Z
NI>~NV~mNi>OONONNNWWNWUH>NNJNPC>
o u
N f ZN
nou a .°li
«O U «NV
JrN YVS
fN O«N
V iLL h
W V V f « Z O W ~ N
u woN f « u
~O•WOWW SS i « MZ< Sh
WWW ZLZZWr •Mr f• W
NuR> .er«s~N.°. .°. ler eiN•o « YZiI
gffNN it~i OV« « O Z« gNdhOV Z N
6JggJWi«SOrO~ ~SV WiNVJNOUi
WW ggYZgWV\giig0 WOfZgOi Y O W
~:JjJMMO yyF«yy~~ iii« dWRq Y>~
•LL OOeNNON~WW iW0«f>iti t
JO> WiOWWriS7ZfaWF01{ZfMO J9ifa«
«i:iOFfhNNOe O 9ti h ZigVJW
O f fNWUV'V ~•
WOiVMOifVOgf OW>OWZ ~«yNy ~gl9iffJeOWW
iM~riiMOOZO VJgiltf RFS~ q~~~i•JN
O«MWWYJiN>FJgMgNfYYf OpJViif OYJi
tr~f~tff{f~ggqqpiOR000YyyYYYUYV~
A A O O MMOMHaOHHM ORAON~«NN«OPPON~jFdOwlMNF~AN~gFN
A m» N «MNNNFATNO N « wVA0000NONgOMO MPNq A
A A NN A HA OAO A ANwM{rnN«Nw A NN H
ONP
frn
UwN
=;0
ZLLO
Or.w
JLL
U LL
O 11 L n
•>Y
O•
2•
y•
X011
IIZ 11
<~
F M
M
~ ~
•
•!/
•2•
Y!
~O•
•i1
I>11
~ ~
OM~tlMA00oO:000mOOViOmT00000o09mNeOTO 00 wmi00e00mOOPpO
p000 OOODPNNOmphONi000T00 TTTPPOOPOONOo
i4mwT~~m000O00wNOwONTep nin y.yvOC.T ~IiTinO..y oN o•m1mmNN
„OOO~PTTNI~~TrymPTviyn9NiiO~mm Nn^P.nwNPwOaNONii
N nl •I ^ w w N
N J J N rv rvl-
N rv
JJ NM miApl•mPOPNPPPPPwP000000pOmpNwww.n wrOiNwwNNNUNryNNNNTA
!iN<bmmNmiduammmimmm444hh4h4h4 rw hh 4n•44444whM1
>AT+:+AATAATAA:TANATATTAAAATA A1~114.ITT Ti~w41 IiA AATAAAPPTTATm
Oii iiiiiili IiliiiiiiiViiiiYiiliiliViiiiViiiiliii
u.m ms ! . • mmmm
m A Oi0 iWm\JJOO¢J i ~wwC
N wA4 NYpP<SJ OD AWC
y M YN NNw D~ L<Ury0\•. w` ~AnpN
!T4 ANm<Mm >V 4i tlOZ NU PSn
wNx .ii °p Jih: .D ..~ nnn.PnwwnN
JiNP \¢Ow O OS w ZAI¢_ j
W ~WOiM N N 2M¢ •< V mww
oemm °.1 e° as r~` rniie 1 me ___ Dtlz
NO .S Lw Gi<fZf Wryn .
~l p44 N! V ¢LYH>44 N N VV VJhSa __
P 4_WpmN_M Z„fONN J~ „ \mNW M2 NNNNA•.OY n
p Na ~ J> Y.O>¢tl V i J Z w SOp
m N» nWW N2 ~ YWm OLD YNJ Y w W¢
V ¢WS iJ V.w WS <tlei hWmw .l< WVVN w>WUUF4
ZO JJ«O .p V.f <NNOWp HOJ<J2N~U4MN 2 •WI< fN6C f<
\ Ntl¢pJ LtlOr• 2~JOiNM pwwwOW14 raNN
40w J2~ >iZ>o Ci _M\OV>fUA\SW=mJf rZ• » Y DOi4 J
OiNOiZ J<NUVpNi Z400JJ 04NN0 WN• NUUVO¢SmVYNmb
w~2 »:sP mN uJUN?~•2 tlwy Ow pD Oif
p 1LSNFNQ¢Rn i¢ 44w m wh~i W >W4i4=VLLl W
w~ezzzW4~1` :aN »hWN<uz z 4
nN4NiisuQe ppWZi .r[~> :<ziiw w z z>_ppwNY ,J.IZZr:r
JZw ~h WSL;tr 2 •4 yf iWh1_ iJ
f• J6Vf W4r USw msOw¢RVpVnJZw r~WW wr JN<hW~ww
2QYy~4GWNNw¢wWWw64Z DS;Mn¢NUNr6OmJF NZhwWWpON NUV
N 4JOh4m VVVwN O 4Sr4i ¢I-W¢SJ4 S1-F4m4prriW<
OD¢Oxw=UZZWNrWUW CDwJ'MN:NWLLe •f rN6
JVOUNLLUNOOFULL'uWWOZ6iG>NmNiym »ip>V Vf LrtZWWWONOimi~ZZ
O
00
1: W N 4 w
Ny i6 O M rii Os
•4 u N V
ti~ ~U O O V J ie
iG i0 u
EO Wi w r<I •Oi•r w OiK o4 o O < i- O :~ <y
f0 Jtl O V iW fVy • 6 U N W_ON MN
M OW J FW 4_4 O YV W_m ZY JNWW w0 U tW •WiW
Uf WOt• V<Y : V 4 ihY 4 w JUO NS Y.
Np SNE •N NN • • w J W NOEN N~JN UONhNJn120 VVG 4f
SVVO JIZV •J¢ O¢ C'i 6fw<tlW4 FW <fOW¢M'•('Oi yI 6!
f„•ii Wf N>S~VOJp<Opw4 NM wl00lO»~ ONi OOOV ,r4ihjW •ZODU
N iNYGWm ~ 0024 EO Vf WwO O V2WStlJSO ••• 4YYE
i 4J J••• • W1M000 iLLZ:J 00 i0>U fNWWWJ• JW OJJ
ONSYiUJW •W :46FZ• UVWO SO6 U<WGM MJJJ I<iriNJ!!
•W f •m 4 1w44¢ •ILiOi •!w L y4DW WROOOVNMN O• \is
OMZ ihtlWMVU~OWSW NNOp Q2tlNi UsN iJ YOYOSS :UYNOO
iV~hJ2i0>WWU<mtlVVJf OOVYUJFS>Ki0<:EViYOY «f.JiNOl004f
OOW wIILL VVUUU2iYiSiSLLINw M•,4 YWVWN JJj JJJiiiiSES2i2Eiii
wPTOffPNwN40000NT10NN4iNONNPO00NAJJPpwOJOP n10PONONOP
N4NlOOOPOOTNNOOOOONNiPO000000N10PNTVN4400PNNPONTI^00
IiNmlywPwwwNmN~NwJPPmmwwP'w MN~OwnrT~Nw rryNw4^rvNINOTN
TwTT NTNwJw T N NN A AN
T
VY 11
A f t
\•
\II¢
•S~
OX
J1
e~pMNPOPOeNppOtlOPryONOPPOON~ONOeOn000OVfOO1~.TwnOFw
NYwY90SOS0^. 10csNf D..\ODn•~N1MmanywOwoOwfomilaa4tlNN
yNnw~1~>PMwmwNh~eFNOyNPrywNryNryNNryIN•tlINNTPtlNNymwwNTPNNw
N w •1 Ndp N N N
JNmyntlNmPOMNTyNawmPOw„minpp.OP01Ny1V NtlNmPOwNmyN tll~mPOwN
AmTTTmmm11111w>NNM1Nw M. ryw FFM1M1YMVO•w tih4N>1. 1•aN4NNN4~NNNhwN
~mwFi wM1l AlM1rlT Il+I1111T Tm:TmmTTTTrymTTmTryryTTNryTTTry+IN11ry TmTTTmmmTTm
OIIy111i y11y1 If•y1111y1y1111111111.~• •IIIIIIIIIy1•
O d
V6\
P:n
LS
ELLO
iN¢
L
1i
L=
•Y
•O
•p
.e
~W
~>
O.O mm m m mm>m0 N/m O
S mYPJ m0 wN O Ui WIN N
P V iO Ory f O ¢IU
1 w ?/ e•LLy O N1Nw Ye O IV i\N
JW F\i• POON _ •N
• _ N6 VeNw N P^N NIOI Y OOi m
6 O >N O>iy i OSi_ fN SP ipW N/O
1 N YN Fi OSI[V O hMry •_JW h Nd ILO V}V
~ Ui iWh I>N \'O :: O\N SW O_ N N
S _ P FNfJ W lJrn w W1WP1 H
fwu S JWN LUjG. • SYJ VyU N
W+s 1 ..~> ~dN ~WOW.tl ;,
i P WINO y¢=iN n:fL _ ~LL L' PL
.PW . » W1eW :¢:/yyo Yrt6 ... WP>W .. .
LL Wf_IOUw_ W P WaWI4t026.1„
J WYif~ Y >iW0_:w 20/ m// 00 \NSVSWY~ JNw
UP06NNGahY¢LL /yWO~ SUVSODUWJEf owJUTULL6/N P/ SYu
N NNOFN20YfE12LL /WOW N•2E4E.1~¢W„Om2
/Vmi1i OW< ~+ 2 h NULL///2P0 N/ OY ~N /wF=/
6MM1UJ iSLLf iO¢S W2Z2N IZwT2
NtWw p Jf0 iJYO_w 'J _J 2Z WJUVhUi64Ym6~WN'ZJ
U ¢NFVw03G i• J h •f ¢L ¢L¢ <w ¢f W OWN O¢YS
<;Z/NSi iPNWO •EWiFNM4 \OWUnm PNS¢NWwJLLOM¢F¢
Nf7N WuULL• 3~f fi¢/SPN O¢/¢U=¢JVfLLOJ aW
n20 J 2 W ¢¢ JwSNGWW'.iLSJ/ewwWw SVNPw OifZ
f2 J44Ym1P/_USJhiiwYYO¢Y.>GnV 6Y'T mJNY O 02
V3U01PJ SfINWJO+ZW>if OlwLLh OtO~wuFiW wfD~<mMw<
Z/PVNmWPf60N020>iOMOLLpOwOOWWUVEN61ynOUP2•NwYNi2•}fN¢w
Z. J
V S
N <
N O S f
S 'l U J P
i LL
m y R N
S-• U
•. ~ 2 s r u•i
N Nh N SQL
<G
iJL OV > 06Z f1 NE O UO
„ =N wl MO Z WWN ~ lu f0 N u yWY
M G SJi2 /VN>Yy ipOY O 2 O: N NMO
MfMN ~fNEi yW >f > N d w NJW
f 09J0'J • /OMWfV~W¢ VtJO Jf Nf HN 4 O <IJf
Y` WV <P;JY N/WOU YN Ji0 iZJV 14V E E O L 2<
UN ••f >iJ'J< EEOONfZOYO4t LINlWYZ 1N N•fn0 EY4 fYmmW
iywpN WWOF ~JOtl/Z4 VWw OOO V OIleWLL4fZ•11 Of> M>JYE
3NEmtl:J/y OOY 9<f 2Y:0 W WLLM/iOZ ViM tFYWW
NM 6/WJOOZPJN<EOEwJNM>WOrWmZ6VO JfJSV>NN OOO !V •f0
•Y NO> NIF:Wy JNZ Cp OZti W:JOONFWf yYFWM WOWWW •MW
YPWY •NifNWW<• NVV iOV 4J~ VM4>fPiN~Y
NW{•'yiMyVOi IEmYV:004>O>WVJZW>YfN 1~ fJOiHNHHNNMYNy
WO Zif«<UP09 S•, 41n0 fffWwNiZOOSH4020tlEE MM<fiM
ZZ2Z000OG•••>•IYYiMZYOY>NNNNNNNNNNNNNNN4h/n'J ~>YZZii
O4mNOTNONNOPNOdN 0IAl00•IM1 Ow00001wP N1011THNPNNONNf•10000.100
1110NNNNONOOMNNPPNNNNTN N•1 T111MN000m •mI10 ism TN00PT0MININ
T N M•1w H mry N m N 111111N MN N •1 w N I1 T M N
7
E
.E
E
u~ w
OPON p
+aNeoa
ec-~i
pm
\X' TNS P
N~
1+
N•Na~..
iii
~~
611 i1~ITTXINN
XiX O•Vr•~I•
u
z
V
uN a
11
Y O
On
Z X f r L ~
O O II Z M
Z Nan S • a G
w\ P 1 U
uZN 11 pfw
II
V6\ ZJ P
O~ X •N
SZO / V7 r
SLLO Iw66w
OLLOOw
OwVJ
in Ns
~: r-u
~+ J ~
XV wJJN
XN JZ6r
Y~JOJ
LL Yo rOwr
U ft s'e~rwi
pN0
JW)Ofw
CYOwOZ
X
X
F
F V
M NZ
w0
X
wNKhiW
wrfFN
II ~jR6
•UNGf•
X !O•
00 NZO
II OZN MW
XWX pjjDOZ
~ i • J Z 6
•r• we ou"i~uwi
•iX aaawNN
= iei was ae own \~/~,\\\
~! X IIN ITIIN NT V
W•
:Y•
X
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 2, 1990
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Larry J. Henderson, Principal Planner
~`
JUtlJGL I: IKHn]rCn Ur rUO UJ bG^Piu iiiTi Gi.i ELG niciii oL~i.n GrtMnl rKUUnnm -
The transfer of 80,400 6e tween Community Development Block
Grant funded Southwest Cucamonga Street Improvement projects.
R ECOMMENOATION_ Staff recommends that the City Council transfer 580,400 from
the 1989-90 Southwest Cucamonga Street Improvement Project to the 1988-89
Southwest Cucamonga Street Improvement Project.
ABSTRACT; The street improvements to Plac ida Court and the portion of Sierra
Madre to the north of Arrow Highway, which were funded through the 1988-89
CDBG program, were originally estimated to require 5202,000 to complete.
Current estimates are that the projects will require 5282,400 to complete.
Therefore, an additional SBD,4DD is required to complete tM s prejec t.
The improvements to Sierra Madre, south of Arrow Highway, which were funded
through the 1989-90 CDBG program, were originally estimated to reau ire
bC]u ,iluu to complete. Current estimates indicate that these improvements may
be completed for 5154,000. Therefore, 595,000 is available from the 1989-90
CDBG ailoca tion for street improvements to cover the increased costs of the
'988-89 improvement project.
Should thn City Council adopt the recommendation, staff will amend the ]988-89
and 1989-90 CDBG applications to complete the transfer of funds between the
two projects, and transfer 580,400 from Account A28-4333-8951 to Account
fl 28-4333-8A11.
BACKGROUND: The City's Citizen Participation Plan for the CDBG program
requires that, prior to approving any change to the allocation of CDBG funds
that would add, delete, or change any CDBG project or funding allocation 6y 25
percent or more, the public be notified and provided an opportunity to comment
on the chance. A Public Notice was puhlishnd ;n Thn na ilv Reporr, Lipon
consideration of the proposed trans ier of funds 6y the City Council under the
Consent Calendar, the Citizen's Participation requirements will be met.
Lity Planner
BB:LJH/j fs ~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Counc il~l"",,~~
FROM: Susan Mickey, Administrative Aide ,)ciit't,
HUBSECT: HILLHOAEP CONTROL ACT OT 1989
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution which
deals with the Billboard Control Act of 1989.
BACROROVND/ANALYeI9t
At the request of the City of Pontana, the Planning staff of the city of
Rancho Cucamonga studied for recommendation H.R. 3389, which le the Billboard
Control Act of 1989. The City's Planning staff, along with the Aaretican
Planning Association find the League of Callforn is Citiee, ie in eupport of
H.R. 3389.
R¢apectfully submitted,
/(
Susan Hickey
Adminietrat ive Alde
SH:ksd
SM\2U9
Attachment
O
4 ............................... •..+......•. +..........
• NASH[NGTON ON-LIVE BILL TEXT REPORT 04/23/90
7 UI S•T rONGRESS
IST SF.$$ION
H. R. 9790
~ ~ + r.l..,~,~ ~ti.,~, ~•.d e, to L1 m1t oul'd nnr advertl r,l n'7
-, .1.. -~~~• -.. l.,, ro.~t xe ',nd Federal-aid primacy highways.
.'Y nr Y~: 'JAY 'Jr KGMHtSENTATIVE$
OCTOBER 2, 1989
Mr. (.EWi$ „p Ge^rgls IEor himself and Mr. SHAW) introduced the following
btl1; which was referred in the committee on Public Norks and
Tr.anspnrra r)rn
A BILL
,~ am~M t1eLe ^_?, Un iteA States Code, to limit outdoor advertising
ed+aoent to lntersrsre and [seer at-ata primary nlgnways.
• Rz tt •anacted by the Senate and House of Repreeenta [Sues of the Un ited+
•5tsrzs of America in Congress assembled,
RR 33ft9
+w+•+wwwww••w•uwwwu•u+++++•w+....+.•w.w+•.++w++•+•+•+++++++•+.w....
+ WASHINGTON ON-LINE BILL TEXT REPORT 04/23/90
S F.C TION t. SHORT TITLE.
2
This Acr may be erred ss the "61116oard Con[rol Act of 1989^.
.rr• -.• rlynrHrc.
The !bngress finds [hat-
~U the Hinhway P,eauti Eicatlon Act of 1965 was on qln ally enacted
to ltm a the prop F.erstlon of billboards slnn9 interstate and
Federal-aid primary highaaye and to promote the public health,
safe ty, and uelE Sre;
!~) des pate the expenditure cE more than 8200,000,000 for billboarA
remov sl since the ensctment of the Hlghasy BeautlEic anon Act of
1085 hnnd roAa of ihnnvnnAa of Mllhn^r.~a aH 11 arenA olnnn mnrh
highways end many more are being erected; ar.d
(3) the Ceneral Accounting Of Erse and the Inspector General of the
Uepartmen[ of Tranaportatton have reported Thar neu billooa nis .are
being erected 3 times as Easr as cld billboards are being taken down.
u F.C. 3. RESTRICTIONS ON OUTDOnR AD'JERTISIN ADJ HCENT TO INTERSTATE AND
FEDERAL.-AID PRIMARY HIGNMAY5.
tj: SENERAL RESTRICTIONS.-s ectton ;1 ~:a t.~._ .:3, !Int t,.d £aste r: Coda,
:s nm.:nded-
.., :n 3'1 b[:ec tt ~.~n lb), by stn king lire lent ;'•.•n t?nc e;
:::: :n aubseotinn cc ), by :nst;r rt nq "EEliac'T r~o cn Teni Cur User
n.-:,n T•rz vi: r)r.n :J r!).~ .-t z:. Ticn ~!: '. r;d ;u ~~etd u:.) fir t!':z :-m.:.v a. •....
-:qne, dept rys, v:d il~v~c ~s w.. ~~, .+- ..._~ ~.,uiurm ~'a lY._ .r•q u.r.ment-.
~_ •n:~ eui:~s acc:un." .,tT Zr the pau nd at the end ,+[ Cite Lvv'
...e n: rn: e;
I{R 3:'±7
• WAC;HINGTON :?N -I',I N F: SILL 'i BBT REPORT :)4/23/90
..................•.•.•...r....r....""".".""""...."••"""•.......e..""""ww+"""""a
3
cat vt eubaect u:n (k ), by striking tiub)ect to compliance with
su b_ ection (g) of this sec UOn Eor the payment of Just r..ompens atio n,
nor. hing" and insarcinq "Nothing";
:4t :r. subsection :1 ), by a.r:k inq "or ••"•ith respect tc fail vtg :..
agr•-e ea tc~ the size, lighting, and spacing i,E aigna, die pays, and
devtc es nr as to unconed commercial or utd ustrf al araaa in wh u•h
_:tyns, di:rpia ys, and devices may 6e erected and mainCOrned under
3~.ib&?C[lOn ld) cY this 3eCCt Un,°;
(51 by Srl'1)a ng f.ub3BCY1o Y:3 :gi, (m ), to ), (O 1, 3Il•1 (p) and
,ede_:y-r.a ting subsactl.:ns .hJ, .i), (, (k;, ;1;, and (q) as
aubsecnnna cg), th ), ill, cJ), lk ), and ill; and
:h7 by adding at the end the Colic wing new subaec tlons:
"lm) Fur pu[poaee of this section, a State shall be treated as Calling
r.o provide eEE ve control of thr- erection and maintenance of outdoor
od vertising alg dla plays, and devices wileas Che State aubm lta to the
tiarrarary nnr Ifl tLC Clip •, ne••amtrs• 1s_ ^,E esch yeas of to the date ... ...~
enactment of this subsection an Inventory of conEorminy and
n~;n-contorming signs, dos plays, and devices to such State.
"(n) Nut later than January 1Sth of each year aEtr_r the date oG the
enactment of r,hta subaertlo n, the Secretary shall submit to the Congress
a detailed report on the extent to which each State has compiled with the
requi n:ments of. this aectlo n. Such report shall include a compilation of
the lnvento rtes aubmltted to the Secretary under subaec hon (m) and a
description of Che efforts made by the Secretary under subaec eton (1) to
aaeure [hat neceanacy dlrectlonal i`nformatlon about Eacllttiea pm vid ing
NR 9389 ~. f
•f ffflfff11t1fffflf"1111"fflfff111ff111fYf11f1fffflffff"lf lff lflfff4Yff 1fef 111, 11•
goods and aervtces in the interest of the traveling public is available
to meta cis ts.".
(b) PROHIBITION AGAINST REMOVAL OF VEGETATION.-Subsection (d) of such
~ection la amended to read as foL OUS:
":d) Fur the purposes of this szc[ic n, a State shall 6z r,reated ax
failing to provide effective control oC the zrzc tion ar.d maintenance of
cutd~~cr ~dvertisiny ~;iy ns, dis olayal and Devices SE the State allows
vi~:gets ucn located on any land on which the S[a to (or any political
subd n~ia ion of Lhz 3ca[e) owns a ri yht-of.~way fur any highway on the
:n t.: t.=.t are ay.-a ~~m or the primary systzm to he cut, altered, or removed
for the ,•ur~~ose of )mprov:ny the via ability of acy outdoor advert[sing
.y n, display, or 'ev:ce which-
... al~e3 f~]t IOnCOrm LO th°_ rugplCP.m S.^.t4 Of {hla ~~..u „ vut
whl ct~ is not rzqu:red to be removed before September 1, 1995, undec
subsection (e ), or
"f;0 a dzscn bzd 1n clsuse ('J, l3 ), t4), o[ (5) of xu6section
._). ,,
:c) SIGNS LOCATED IN c:UMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL AREAS.-Subaec lion (e>. of 2
such section :s amended t-o read as follows:
"(e) Notw r[hstanding subsection (c J, for [he purposes of this sec ti on,
.~~eE ec[ive c.onrrol of. tl:e zrzction and maintenance of outdoor advertising
r;yns, displ:,ys, and dev u:ea does not require the removal 6eEore
Szptambar 1, 1'?95, of any sign, display, or device which is ].awfully in
~,R:s Cet~ce ,.n SepC P.mbzr 1, 1989, and which is located-
~U in an area zoned industrl al or commercial under authority of
HR iFf9
. .. .. .......111 uf1f.f..1.1...
..1.1 f.f....f411f1f1ff1111,f uff"111111..«
" WASHINGTON UC1-LINE BILL TEXT REPORT 04/23/90 +
•1f'f••ff111111111111111111111111111}ff111f11if111111f1111R}M1f4f11R11f1f 11181111
5
SCa[e la W, Or
":2) Sn unzoa~d commercial or lnd us trial areas ae determined by
y'ceme r~{ be C9leEn. the aEVer di 3talea and the Secretary .".
SEC'. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.
The amendmznts made by section 3 shall apply with rea pect to each Stele
after [hz close of the first regular session of the legisle LUre of such
Slate [hat occurs after the date of enactment of this Act.
HR 3309
BILL N07
/3
RESOLVTION NO. 90-~~~
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, TO SUPPORT N.R. 3389, THE
BILLBOARD CONTROL ACT OF 1989
WHEREAS, H. R. ]389, the Billboard Control Act of 1989, was introduced
by Congressman John Lawie of Georgia on October 2, 1989; and
WHEREAS, H.R. 3389, returns to states and local governments the right
to regulate existing billboards under their own land use laws; and
WHEREAS, H.H. 3389, plecea a moratozium on new blllboazd construction
along interetates and Federal primary aide highways; and
WHEREAS, N.R. 3389, shall find a 9tatB Lo De in non-compl tense if
vegetations located on any land on which the State owns a right-of-way, ie
,.n...-~..i n.. •An
visibility of any outdoor advert ieing sign, 'display, nor device`
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby support N.A. 3389.
SM\209
~'.
h'
z'
i I~
~; ..
`'r"":~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 2, 1990
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: John L. Martin, Associate Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Aoprovai to Award and Execute a Professional Services ii
Agreement with RJM Design Group, Inc., to prepare plans, ~
•pccif!cat:crs ai e;t{mui.es for Landscaping me nn liken
V
!
Avenue Underpass
East and Nest Parkways (7th Street to
i
Jersey Boulevard) and Median (6ih Street to
Jersey Boulevard) for a fee not to exceed 537,000.00 to be
paid from the Redevelopment Agency funds, Account ~
,J_cnBnn e„ additional 1D: cai,tii~yercy allo::arte w, to
established for use under the approval of the City
Engineer.
REGOMEIOATION:
Rpproval to Award and Execute a Professional Services Agreement with
RJM Design Group to prepare plans, specifications and estimates for
Landscaping the Milliken Avenue Underpass East and Mest parkways (7th
Street to Jersey Boulevard) and Medians (6th Street to Jersey Boulevard)
for a fee not to exceed (37,000.00 to be paid from the Redevelopment
a: F:i ~ .. ~°` '°~i'y6iiCf 6iivwa.i~c w ue mwu„aneu
for use under the approval of the City Engineer.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The City has contracted with the architectural flna of RJM Design Group
to prepare plans, specifications and estimates for the Milliken Avenue
Underpass East and Nest parkways (7th Street to Jersey Boulevard) and
Medians (6th Street to Jersey Boulevardl.
The proposed project consists of landscaping the Parkways (7th Street to
Jersey Boulevard) and Lhe Medtens (6th Street to Jersey Boulevard) of the
Milliken Avenue Underpass. The Landscaping will complete the
Milliken Avenue Underpass, the structural portion of which is scheduled
for construction 1n the summer of 1990.
Res 1 submitted, ~,
. .M:ly
S
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
GATE: May 2, 1990
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
RY: W111n Valhuana e-z~~~,.,• r~wi r.,,.a.,ee~
SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for
Parcel Map 9350, located on the northeast corner of Base Line
Road and Milliken Avenue, submitted by The Nilliam Lyon Company
RF.COMMENDATIpI
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution
accepting the subject agreement and security for Parcel Map 9350, and
authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement.
ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND
Parcel Map 9350, located ort the northeast corner of Base Line Road and
Milliken Avenue, was approved by the City Council on March 16, 1988.
The Developer, The Nilliam Lyon Company. 1s submitting an agreement and
security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the
following amounts:
Ellena Park - Storm Drain
Faithful Performance BonA: f116,300.00
Labor and Material Bond: f 58,150.00
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Rasp 1 submitted,
:S ~~7
Attachment
RESOLUTION N0. "I~~i { CP
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROYIN6 IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
AND I!N'ROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL M11P 9350
NHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 9350, submitted by The Nillias Lyon
Compagy, and consisting cf 3 parcels, located on the northeast eorner of Base
Line Road and Milliken Avenue, was approved by the Planning Co~lssion of the
City of Rancho Cvcaaanaa on November 27. 1985: anA
NHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 9350 is Lhe final sap of the division of land
approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and
NHEREAS, as part of the requirements established as prerequisite to
approval of the finai sap by the City Council of said City have now been set
by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement
Security for E11ena Park Stop Drain by the Nilliam Lyon Company as developer.
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by 4he City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said
Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby
approved and the M4yor 1s hereby authorised to sign said Improvement Agreement
on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest.
I~
H IGNLAND AVENLJL~
~.
C
x
D
C
m
z
C
m
-~ Y w
BAlFL/fYL liOAD
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMgNGA
~aa ame~ox
A
0
r
m
H
m
A
D
G
m
T.
G
m
/V
N
!1'SY: _I°M 935
T1TLL~[LEN.4 PARK
~8
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT ~''
DATE: Mdy 2, 1990
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer ,
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Mocks Inspecto~~
SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 10349,
located on the crest side of Sapphire Street at Thoroughbred
Street, submitted by Mal ton Hillside Estates ,
RECONEIDIITIOM
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution,
accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the
MAyor and Cfty Clerk to sign said agreement.
ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction
of the public improvements for Tract 10349 were approved by the City Council
on July 2, 1987, in the following amounts.
Faithful Perforwance Bond: f326,000.00
Labor and Material Bond: f163,000.00
The developer, Halton Hillside Estates, is requesting approval of a 6-month
extension on said Improvement agreement. Copies of the Iaprovement Agreement
Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Res~itted,
1
i
,
:SMG•
ALLdChmen t5
!9
5
Thy
2025 east financial way % post office box 775: glenEora, caldomia 91740 i X818) 983-8505
April 5, 2990
Steve M. Gilliland
Atblic Worits 71~ector
City of Rinds CucaIDQya
Y.O. Hox 807
]ta-x3Yy Ncamwge, CA 9!729
Fee: Expiration of IRuo~rent Agre®ent
far lYact 10349
Deal'2II'. Gilliland:
Eltclased 38 atr request for an extsneion m the 1lopxwem9t Agreeora+t
f~ 1Yact 10349 slag with as check in ttW amaart of $251 f~ that
mctertsion. Nbrk r®eini7y at this time W rover the work in the
ir~rovemant agreamnt to as follows:
1. Finish cgadi~ on the last 32 lob in tract of 57 lloueee
2. Planting of street trsee on fi~ul 32 lob
3. Rove and r~lace damaged sub std ~~ aleaY
4. lay down fine! muss of pavitg m streets
~. rinrstt grade tw (2) arms in horse trails
Work m all of the above it®e, ew0ept far !b. 5, 18 in plvgreae. On
Item No. 5, r+e are dsititg tar n deb~timo from l~ry Nideri who is
inwlved in acme 4 on the hatse trails adjaoatt to our propmty
whidi need to be bletded into tin horse tnliL whidt rrs have
mfstrucbd.
7]le iaprvv~tt s9raamerd far 'itarot 10349 eo~iree on Apr11 S, 1990. Wa
believe the above item will b• Depleted in appxaocimtaly 90 to 120
days, but request an extansirn fCr six (e) sonUts frc~ April 5. 1990 to
cover any wntitngsrcise.
Sincezaly,
~2{rC ivAiIICi7 001Q'At7Y
~~---~-
F]eecvtivu V1oe Prssidrtt
~o I~
co~~y
RESOLUTION NO. q0- f 77
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 10349
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement AgreeieeR*. Extenston
executed nn wav ? icon nq u_l t;,: ~ ;~;,;~ iaiai:es as dereioper, for tiw:
improvement of public right-of-way ayacent to the real property specifically
described therein, and generally located on the west side of Sapphire Street
at Thoroughbred Street; and
NHEREAS, the iDStallation Of such improva~onte ,Inerrine.l ++ s+ig
Improvement Agreement and subject to the Lamas thereof, is to be done -in
coniunctlon with the development of said tract 10349; and
NHEREAS, said Iwprovenent Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which 1s identified
in said Improvement Agreement Extension.
NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
CaUfornia hereby resolves, that said improvement Agreement Extenston and said
Improvement Security be and the sane are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of
the CTty of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Cierk to attest thereto.
~'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 2, 1990
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
i
8Y: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector
SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Map 9498,
located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 4th Street,
e~ilriffaA Av Owi}br_ainkwr Ga?BYav
RECOMENDATIOM
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution,
accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND
Improvement Agreement and improvement Security to guarantee the construction
of the public improvements for Parcel Nap 9498 were originally approved by the
City Council on December 19, 1985, in the following amounts.
Haven Avenue Median 4th Street Median
Faithful Performance Bond: f66,500.00 550.000.00
Labor and Material Bond: 533,250.00 f25,000.00
The developer, Reiter-Rinker Gateway, is requesting approval of a 12-aanth
extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement
Extension a available in the City Clerk's Office.
Respe fitted,
~~
Attachments
A.H. REITER DEVELOPMENT
April 5, 1990
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Attn: Steve M. Gilliland
Public Works Inspector
RE: E%TENSION OF IlfYROVEMENT AGREElH?NT OF
PARCEL MAP 9498, FOURTH STREET
Dear Steve:
t.:~~4 :; - 199.1
"~ K5 n'GNG CUCA MUNGA
ENGINEERING DiVi$IGry
This request for extension is based on the undecided
determination by the City regarding the requirement o£
a median on Fourth Street. The Bond for this improvement
fe still in place.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
A. N. D T CO.
,/
'~ Au at H. to
/rm
Encls.
d3
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 7250 • Newport Bexh, California 926567250 • 014) 751594
Pullman at Redhill
A.H. REITER DEVELOPMENT
April 5, 1990
~, ..
rrt ~~
'L0, i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA "~" "~ R4Nt,~AO
Ra~chooCucamonga, CA 91730 `rFCiNFFR7NG pySiONNGA
Arrn~ Steve M, O;t L+'send
Public Works Inspector
RE: EBTENSION OF IMPROV@ffiiT AGREEMENT OF
PARCEL lfAP 9498 HAVEN AVE., MEDIAN ISLAND
Dear Steve:
Per our agreement dated July 12, 1989, we are again
requesting another extension until such time as we
develop the adjacent parcel, which should occur this
Fall.
Enclosed you will find previous correspondence reaardinx
this matter.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Very truly y ra,
A. H TF CO.
Aug st H. a ter, III
/rm
Encls.
~~
Mailing Address: P.O. Boa 7250 • Newport Bexh, Giifornia 9265&7250 • (771 751541
Pullman as Eedhill
A.H. REI i ER DEVELOPMENT ~
July 12, 1989
CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA
evx oll/
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Attn: Steve M. Gilliland
Public Works Inapec[or
RE: E%TENSION OF IMPROVE!ffii1' AGREEMENT OF
PARCEL NAP 9498 HAVER AVE., l~DIAN ISLAND
Dear Steve:
The referenced improvements have been completed by the
City of Rancho Cucamonga. However, the total fee for the
entire improvement was $87,670 as of 1/11/89, which was
more than we could afford at that came. We were able to
pay a fee of $28,745 for that portion of land thet we were
improving and bonded the unpaid amount.
n.- ..r ii
-- c -- '=~=l..p sire rema maer of the site, we will then
pay~the City the amount then due for their construction of
the Median Island.
I have enclosed a letter dated January 11, 1989 to the
City of Rancho Cucamonga regarding this subject which may
be of information to you.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
A. H. REI MEIiT CO.
r
A st H.'Reiter, III
/rm
Encls.
~S
Meiling Address: P,O. 90>< 7250 • Newport Beach, California 916567250.01q 751.1591
Pullman at Redhill
January 11, 1989
Mr. Russ Maguire
way ia,ceriny iieirdi:=•n Cif:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Post Office Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Re: Parcel Yap 9!98
Raven Avenue Median
Dear Ruas:
Confirming our telephone conversation yeatarday, I propose the
following alternative for releasing the bonds for the median
island eonstmction.
I am requesting that the fee of 587,670.55 ba divided into
prooortionate lenotha of our orooerty as it '.a A.v.t„1wA s,,.
example, our first phase boundary on Raven has a length of 565
feet to the center line of Trademark, or approximately 35i of the
1,593 feet of property along Raven. I propose that we pay
_331,000.00 today, maintain the surety bond of 566,500.00 on the
property for your security (copy of bond bill and our payment
enclosed), and pay the balance as the remainder of the property
is permitted fox development.
Please let me know your thoughts on this matter at your earliest
convenience.
t
Sincerel ~ ~ '~'~"~ ~L ~'~~~
~? r _ . 1
A at R. Reiter III ~R~
enca.
a~
MsiNaR Addrnf: -,O. aos 7250 • Nawpon eexh, Glilwnu 925567250 • G'S0 751594
hllmm r Rtdhill
i
RESOLUTION N0. qo - ~ 7 p
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 9498
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an improvement Agreemenk Extension
executed on May 2, 1990, by Reiter-Rinker Gateway as developer, for the
Imp rV YemenG Ui p~~llL r190 L-ul-w¢7 uuj abeni. w iic iwi yrLyeli,j ~pe~if l~dlly
described therein, and generally located on the northeast corner of Haven
Avenue and 4th Street; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described fn said
Improvement Agreement and subject to Lhe terms thereof, is to be done in
confunction with the development of said Parcel Map 9498; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified
in said Improvement Agreement Extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said
Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor 1s
hereby authorized to sign said Imprcvement Agrement Extension on behalf of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
~7
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF ftEPOftT
GATE: Milt' 2, 1990
T0: Ctty Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
9Y: Stove M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector
cult lrrT• oolapvn of nnnda nnA HnN r" of ftaenUHnn
The reQuired stritii 9~yrr~rt's far " B7 W re hcc.^. ^^-~le•_ed in an
acceptable canner, and it is recoauended that City Council accept said
improvecents, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Coepletlon
and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Perforcance Bond in
the acount of 5440,000.00.
8ACK6ROUND/ANALYSIS
DR 87-06 - located on the southnest corner of Jersey Boulevard and
Vincent Avenue
ua'iEWPin: nuwar rropercies
5321 Franklin Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90027
Release:
Faithful Perforaance Bond (Street) (440,000,00
Respe f y sub fitted,
R :SMG:s,lc~ ..
__
Attachcent
RESOLUTION N0. 9O - I79
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGl1, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR DR 87-06 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE NORK
YHEREAS, the construction of public ingroveerents for OR 87-06 have
been cawtpleted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
YNr9raS a Nnl1ro of fnemiaf.irtn ie ,vm,i w,A M ~,_ en ew ~..}iF ~i n~
the work couplets.
NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is
authorized to sign and file a Notice of Coupletton with the County Recorder of
San nernardino County.
°e.'
rtrtT An n A MI'~IIA l~T ih A TJ/IAfC A
STAFF REPORT
DATE: Myr 2, 1990
T0: City Council and City Manager 1
FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector
SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion
The required street improvements for OR 88-21 have been completed in an
acceptable manner, and it is recowended that City Council accept said
improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion
and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Cash
Bond in the amount of (11,000.00.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
DR 88-21 -located on the south side of 9th Street between Hellman Avenue
and Vineyard Avenue
DEVELOPER: Fasson
8989 9th Street
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Release;
Faithful Performance Bond (Street) f11,000.00
Resp y ub ted,
e
R~iM ~M6:sJm
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO. 9D"I8D
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAlM)NGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR OR 88-21 ANU AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE NORK
NNEREAS, the construction of public inprovesents for OR 88-21 have
been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is repaired to be filed, certifying
the wore complete.
NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is
authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of
San Bernardino County.
3~
- - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~An+
~ - ~
oy
STAFF REPORT
~~' c
y
~ ,
c' 7
~~
~
F}-'~~,
A
Z
DATE: May 2, 1990 -
=_
er; Ile
I
TO: Mayor, Members of City Council and City Manager
FRO ~
~
M: •7oe Sohult2, Community Services Manager (
BY: Raren McGuire-Emery, Associate Park Plann~3r
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF THE OLD TOWN PARK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION: That the (airy nOU.^.cil;
i. Accept as complete the Improvement of Old Town Park; and
2. Authorize final payment to Martin J. Jaska, Inc., for the
work; and
3. Approve the attached resolution authorizing the community
Services Manager to Pile a Notice of Completion for the
Improvement of Old Town Park; and
4. Release the project retentlon within the specified time after
recordation of the Notice of Completion.
BACRGROiR7D; The improvement of Old Town Park has been completed
to the satisfaction of the Community Services Manager. It is
therefore recommended that the City Council accept the project
from the Contractor, Martin J. Jaska, Inc., as complete, authorize
final payment, anfl direct the Community Services Manager to file a
Notice of Completion for the work. It is also recommended that
the contractor's retention be released with a surety bond in the
amount oP 591,118.10 (108 of the original contract amount), being
continued for the required one-year maintenance and warranty
period for the project. Change orders for the park improvements
did not exceed 48 of the original contract amount.
Respectfully submitted,
Y Y~
L
Joe Schultz
Com~ty Se es Manager
JS/kls
Attachment
3~
RESOLUTION NO. 90- 'O'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING
THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE OLD TOWN
PARR PROJECT AND A?~THORT-ZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the Old
Town Park Project have been completed to the satisfaction of the
:.eTieynr Ji wmm4nicy aervicsa7 and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion ie required to be filed,
certifying the work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, ba it resolved, that the work is hereby
accepted and the Manager of community 6ervicee is authorized to
sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder oP
San Bernardino County.
PASSED, APPROVED and ACCEPTED the 2nd day of May, 1990.
avoc.
NOES:
ABSENT:
L. Stout, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra Adams, City Clerk
---- - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 2, 1990
T0: Mayor, Members of City Council and City Manager
tn.,,,. .. ~...y .,. .,....., .., ~r,.,.s .. ,.r ......,.7.._ ~
I,
BY: Bonnie Cabrinha, Special Districts Supervisor ~
SGBJECT: APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND SETTING
ii PUBLIC riEnRiivG Oi: JUi:E u, .">;~ .~ .... ..... <...... ..
ASSESSMENTS AND APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S
REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I, 2, 3,
9, 5, 6, 7 AND 8.
RECOP4IENDATION:
Staff recommends that City Council adopt the attached Resolutions
civi.^,g preliminary apprcval of Ci*_y Engineer's Reports, der larin9
its intention to levy and collect assessments within Landscape
Maintenance District Nos. I, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for Fiscal Year
innn,oi ...a ..rvo.;..., a limo ~nrl n]arc fnr a Puhlir Haarinn.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Because of City Council's enhanced commitment to the City's
Assessment District oroaram over the last five years the
assessments wick ir. the Landscape Maintenance Districts have been
invclved in a downward trend. 'This trend started i.n 1985 and has
continued into June of 1990.
However because of inflationary pressures
of infrastructures maintained, the cost
Districts are beginning [o increase to
recommendi r.g some assessment increases.
n.-: ,. .. a.,.. ,rnT~
......,. ,..n y^ ...... ................. ._.. ~.. _.. _.... ..._
to address this issue. Currently the (CPI)
Only those districts requiring an increase
one.
and increases in amount
within some Assessment
the point that we are
Staff believes tha*_
_ ~i; _
ref lectsa 5~ increase .~
will be recommended for
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE GISTRICTS
May 2, 1990
Page 2
The following is a summary of these assessment districts:
S,andscape Maintenance Dist. No. 1 - General City
my.,. ,.a rC~c nn~ ..4~ .r... n
increase of 5$ and an increase to fund the capital improvement
projects approved by City Council in October of 1989. A list of
the approved improvements is attached to the Engineer's Report.
Lands^_ape Maintenance Dist. No. 2 - Victoria
The area being maintained by the district will double during
1990/91. The cost of maintenance is the basis fcr the 5~ increase
in the assessment rate ($204.75). The cost of maintaining the
parkways and parks has increased dramatically and even with the
increase proposed expenditures will need to be monitored very
closely to insure sufficient funds for the year.
T,a nra SCapc Maintenance Dist. NO. 3
ZCNE A - HYSSOP
This eight parcel district continues as projected and no rate
increase is needed for fiscal year 1990/91.
'LONE B - COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS
Commercial and Industrial properties make up this dist r.ict and
provide the funds for maintenance of median islands within the
commercial and industrial area. The concept for the assessment
rate at formation was to spread the necessary costs over the
acreage within the district. An increase of 55.00 per acre is
necessary to provide sufficient funding and the major expenditure
continues to be contract maintenance. The proposed rate is
$170/acre.
Landscape Maintenance Dist. No. 4 - Terra Vista
The recommended rate ($110.25) includes a 56 increase necessary due
to the increase in park maintenance costs. Four neighborhood parks
will be maintained in 1990/91. Expenditures will be monitored
closely to insure sufficient funding.
3~
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS
May 2, 2990
Page 3
Landscape Maintenance Dist. No. 5 - Tot Lot
This district does pct charge in number of units or area
mgint gineri Th? riiLronY a~cecmm~nt rate of StQS __ _~i £fi to
(`nvPr I`n the fns l00(1/Q'I
Landscape Maintenance Dist. No. 6 - Caryn
The current rate (5195) is sufficient to fund maintenance for
fiscal year 1990/91. Since landscaping has just recently been
accepted for maintenance by the district it is recommended that. the
rate remain stable until a maintenance history pattern can be
deue loped. This provides sufficient funding for unexpected
expenditures that can not be projected at this time.
We are further analyzing this district considering a one time
rebate or special credit to reflect assessments not utilized in
earlier years. Also we are researching the utilization of these
funds for a possible nark site. Please review the Carvn
Freliminary Engineers report as extremely preliminary.
Landscape Maintenance Dist. No. 7 - Nor..*.h Etiwanda
This is the first year for assessments in this district and the
rate (S75.G0) is based on funds reguired to maintain landscaping
cn the first tracts withi r. Etiwanda Highlands. The rate for this
district will increase as development occurs.
Landscape Maintenance Dist. t7o. 8 - South Etiwanda
This is the firs*_ year for assessments in this district. The rate
(595.00) is based on projected tests for landscaping for the first
tracts within the district. The rate for this district will
i.-, crease as development occurs.
Rns~eGLfuiiv auuni ii. i.e ii.
erry B. Fu lwood
~~~
Deputy City Manager
JBF:de
Attachments
3C~
E1Q{®I'f
86/88 88/87 87/89 88/89 89/90 90/91
landscape Maintenance $38,00 $28.00 $25.50 $25.00 $25.00 $35.00
DisWCt 1 (General City)
landscape Mairdenance $223,71 $223.77 $1y5.0U
DlsWCt 2 Nlctorla)
landscape Maintenance $0,00 $258.75 $258.75
District 3A (Hyssop)
$195.00 $295.00 $204.75
$258.75 $258.75 $258.75
landscape Maintenance $0,00 $0,00 $0.00 $45/per acre $165/per acre $170.00
District 3B (Medians)
landscape Maintenance $154.10 $128,34 $105.00
DLStrict 4 (Terre V1sta)
$105.00 $105.00 $110.25
i.andscape Maintenance $163,64 $113.41 $111.00
Dismct 5 frot LoU
landscape Maintenance $0.00 $0,00 $195.00
Dlstnct 6 fCarynl
landscape Maintenance
District 7 (North Etiwanda)
landscape Maintenance
Uistricl 8 (South EOwanda)
$105.00 $105.00 $105.00
$195.00 $195.00 $195,00
$75.00
$95.00
37
RESOLUTION NO. ~~ "
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF
CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND
8.
RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that:
rnrucorno r~taoo„i i~ aro i_anuscape arm ugnnng Act of 1972, the City Engineer
is required to make and file with the City clerk of the city an annual report in writing for which
assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and/or improve-
ment of said Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. i, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. 7 and 8.
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a
report in writing as called for under and pursuant 1o said Act, which has been presented tc this
Council for wnsideration; and
WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and every pan
thereof. and finds that each and every pan of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor
any pan thereof, requires or should be mod'rfied in any respect.
NOW, THEREFORE, It Is ordered as folbws
1 . That the Engineer's Estimate of itemized costs and expenses of said work
and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said
,vymi w, aiw vain ~i iiww ae ua, ~r Ni6uimim i;r dyyiv.vu iai,..
confirmed.
2. That the diagrams showing the Assessment Districts referred to and
described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within
said Assessment Districts are hereby preliminarily approved and cen-
firmed.
3. That the proposed assessments upon the subdivisions of land in said
Assessment Districts in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received
by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental
expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily
approved and confirmed.
4. Tiral said rnpuri siiaii stand es lire Ciiy Engineerk Annu&i Reyuri for ilia
fiscal year 1990/91 for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings.
38
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
iandscape Maintenance District No. 1
(General Clty Parkways & Equestrian Trails)
Fiscal Year 1990/91
The 1990/91 annual report for [andscape Maintenance District No. 1
(General City) is prepared in compllance with the requirements of Article 4,
Chapter 1, Divisfon 5 of the Streets and Highways Code. State of California
(Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
Protected operations and maintenance costs for Fiscal Yeazs 1989/90
and 1990/91 are provided in this report. Protected costs are used to
establish the necessary assessment rate to furnish the highest quality
landscaping at the lowest possible assessment rate, Assessments are used to
furnish services and materials for maintenance, operation, servicing and
restoration of parkways and equestrian trails with the district. The
maintenance of Landscape Matntenauce Dlsh4e[ No. 1 is considered of
general benefit to all areas In the diatrtet and the cost shall be divided as
lndtcated in this report.
Maintenance of parkways and equestrian trails include repair of
irrigation systems, removal or replacement of all or part of landscaping
improvements. The maintenance also includes providing for the life,
growth, health and beauty of the landscaping. Trimming, spraying,
fertilizing and/or treating for disease or inJury as well as removal of
trimmings, rubbish or debris are part of the ongoing maintenance. Walls
fmmediatety adJacent to parkways are repaired and kept free of graffiti as
part of the maintenance process.
Capital Improvements within Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
were constructed by the developers of the indtvidual subdivisions. The plans
and Improvements are as stipulated to the conditions of approval for each
development and as approved by the Engineering Division.
Fiscal Year 1989/90 Review
General City
During fiscal yeaz 1989/90 additional moisture sensors were installed
in various pazlcways for the conservation of water. Moisture sensors have
proven to be of great benefit in the reduction of water usage and
subsequently water costs.
As of Projected
59/90 Budget 02/2S/90 06/30/90
Assmt. Admin. $ 36,172 $ 36,172 $ 36,172
Overhead $ 1,130 -0- $ 1,130
Maint./Oper. $ 15,000 $ 785 $ 5,000
Veh. Matnt. $ 5.500 -0- -0-
Cont. Trees $ 5,000 -0- $ 5,000'
Trail Maint. $ 12,000 -0- $ 5,000
Contract -Van. $ 10,000 -0- $ 10,000
Contract - Matnt. $ 80,000 $ 56,547 $ 80,000
free Mafnt/Admin. $ 17,000 -0- $ 5,000
Capital Exp. $ 15,000 -0- $ 15,000
Water $ 17,000 $ 13,938 $ 22,128
Electric $ 6,000 $ 3,925 $ 6,000
Cap.Imprvmts. 51 20.000 -O- _p_as
TOTAL $339,802 $111,371 $ 190,430
" The contingency account for trees established to provide funds for
tree replacements required due to a maJor storm or disaster has $10.000.
Thts money is in a reserve account and can only be expended upon approval
by City Council.
City Council reviewed possible capital improvement protects during
the current year and the $120,000 budgeted will be carried over and
budgeted for possible 90/91 capital protects.
During the current fiscal yeaz the following tracts (diagrams attached)
were annexed to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1:
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
Annexations for Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91
ANNEXED MAY 3, 1989
ANNEXED JUNE 7, 1989
ANNEXED AUGUST 2. 1989
ANNEXED SEPT. 6, 1989
ANNEXED OCT. 4, 1989
ANNEXED OCT. 18, 1989
ANNEXED NOV. 1. 1989
ANNEXED NOV. 15, 1959
APIYEXED DEC. 6, 1989
ANNEXED JAN. 3, 1990
ANNEXED FEB. 21, 1990
ANNEXED MARCH 7, 1990
Tract 12420
Tract 13359
Par~rl Mom 1991 fi
Parcel Map 12573
Tract 13727
T.-aet 19g9n
D.R. 87-34
Tract 13810
Tract 13930
Pazcel Map 11685
Tract 13813
Parcel Map9431
Tract 13851
ILGL.L 1JVLl
Tract 13891-1
Tract 13891-2
Tract 13890-1
Tract 13890-2
114 AU.
6 A.U.
Z nT1
2 AU.
la Au.
16 AT7
3 AU.
7 AU.
23 AU.
3 AU.
6 AU.
5.88 AU.
61 AU.
i iv u.
Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91
The proposed expenditures for fiscal year 1990/91 reflect the intent to
provide continued high quality maintenance as well as maintaining a
reasonable assessment rate.
Expenditure History
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
(PPneral ('ih•
Protected Budget
88/S9 89/90 90/91
Assmt. Admin. $ 29,515 $ 36,172 $ 40,940
Overhead -0- $ 1,130 $ 1,280
Maint./Oper. $ 2,430 $ 5,000 $ 5,000
Veh. Matnt. -O- -0- $ 1,000
Cnnt. Trees $ 4,000 $ 5,000 $ 500
Trail Maint. -0- $ 5.000 $ 12,360
Contract -Van. -0- $ 10,000 $ 6,000
Contract - Mafnt. $ 57,048 $ 80,000 $184,250
Tree Maint/Admin. -0- $ 5,000 $ 14.000
Capital Exp. $ 9,289 $ 15,000 -0-
Water $ 15,087 $ 22,128 $ 25,500
Electric $ 4,655 $ 6,000 $ 5,800
n.. A., m c, nen
_
Addt'1. Cap Imp. $345, S79••
Loan Repayment _ $ 59.807
TOTAL $1 73,874 $190,430 $567.808
" Includes $120,000 from 89/90 Budget
" Capttat Reserve Fund Loan to District
Projected Carryover $ 47,006
6 months funding $254,001
Capital Carryover $120,000
RE9UIRED REVENUE
u ~ ^ted ^s^ ^t ..^.ecei-'- T
r Cie., c^^mc.. Pao w4ir0,6v2
Budgeted 89/90 Carryover $ 47,006
Capital Carryover $120.000
TOTAL $567,808
Due to protected maintenance coats there w61 be no funding of equipment
or vehicles projects during fiscal yeaz 1990/91.
It is estimated there wlll be 13024 assessment units within this district in
fiscal year 1990/91. After review of expenditures, assessment receipts,
posstble carryover funds and protected costs, the assessment rated will be
set at $35.00/unit. Assessment receipts for any fiscal yeaz are not realized
until after December 10 and a portion of the estimated carryover funds will
be used to fund the district for the first six months of 1990/91.
1990/91 Assessment Rate
9899 Assessment Units x $35.00 $346,1 15
3125 Assessment Units X $14.88 = $ 54,687
89/90 Budget Carryover $ 47,006
89/90 Capital Carryover $120.000
TOTAL = $567,808
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
<o~
s/o
S60
S50
S40
S30
S20
82/83 83!84 84/85 85/86 86/87 87!88 88/89 89/90 90/91
Fiscal Year
-~ Assessment Rates
CAPITAL IMPROVMENT PROJECTS
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
DESCRIPTIVE LOCATION ESTIMATED COST
S/s Base Line, Ramona to Cambridge $ 34,500
S!s Base Lino, c y H of Cc.^.t e: $ iS,750
S/s Hase Line, from 500' E/o Center $ 18,000
NWC Haven 6 Wilson, Haven from Wilson North;
Wil son from Haven to Mayberry; Mayberry from
Wil son to N/o Poplar S 55,500
N b S Side of Victoria E/o Haven to E/o Mango
E/s Haven S/o Victoria $ 36,000
S/s Banyan from Zircon Lo Carnelian $ 33,000
SWC Lemon b Hermosa; Hermosa from Highland
to Lemon, Lemon from Hermoa to 750' West $ 19,500
N/s Wilson, E b W of Birchbay $ 15,750
NEC Hermosa and 26th $ 19,500
E/s Haven, N/o Railroad c is cnn
E/s Hermosa, N b S of Railroad $ 37,500
W/s Archibald from 200' S/o Almond to 175'
N/o La Colina $ 27,000
N/s Banyan E b W/o Jadeite; W/s Archibald
N/o Banyan E/o Amethyst from S/o Sunflower
to Manzanita $ 16,500
NEC Archibald and Wilson; Archibald ErOm
S/o Cottonwood to Wilson, Wilson E/o
Archibald $ 12,000
E/s Beryl N b S/o Culpepper S 13,5p~
S/s Lemon from 350' W/o to 600' E/o Mayberry $ 15,000
S/s Alta Loma from Revere to Mayberry; includes
W/s of Revers Erom Alta Loma to Highland and
E/o Revere from 185' N/o to Highland $ 13,500
W/s Beryl N b S/o Sunflower $ 15,000
N/s Banyan from E/o Zircon to W/o Vineyard $ 11,250
W/s Hermosa N b S/o Ironwood $ 11,250
N/o Lemon E/o London
$ 13,500
N/s 19th E b W/o Mayberry $ 13,500
E/s Archibald N b S/o Sunflower $ 12,000
S!s 4_eto.__ ~ 5 W,~^ ~~ndcr. $ 12,710
S/s Wilson from Archibald to Amethyst;
W/s Archibald S/o Wilson $ 13,500
W/s Archiblad N b S/s o£ La Gloria;
N b S/s Of La Gloria W/n Arrhihal~ $ 2?,~Q~
TOTAL $527,250
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
V[ctoria Planned Community
Fiscal 1990/91
The annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 is prepared in
compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets
and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
i'uis iepuii ucais wiui ine maintenance costs for fiscal year 198y/90 ana me
protected maintenance costs for fiscal year 1990!91. These protected costs are used
to determine the assessment rate required to provide the highest quality of
landscaping at [he lowest possible assessment. The funds are used to furnish services
and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, servicing and
restorallon of pazkways, parks, and troll improvements. Maintenance of this district
is considered of general beneQt to all azeas within the district and costs shall be
divided as indicated in this report.
Maintenance of parkways, parks and trails include repair of irrigation sysiems.
removal or replacement of all or part of landscaping improvements and necessary
cleaning and repair of trails. The ma/ntenance also includes providing the life,
arnwfh hralhh anti hnanfir nr ffio In~,.le__..a.n 'M ~. ~~~6 ;Yruj.:.6, fGCuiuiug ai~u/ua
~._..y.
treating for disease or intury as well as removal of trimmings, rubbish or debris are
part of the ongoing maintenance. Walls Immediately adtacent to parkways are
repaired and kept free of graffiti as part of the maintenance process.
Park, parkway and trail improvements within Landscape Maintenance District
No. 2 were constructed by the developers of the individual subdivisions. The plans
and Improvements are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each
development and as approved by the Engineering Division.
Review of Fiscal Year 1989/90
There were no unusual maintenance problems during the year. Maintenance of
the districts pazltways continues to be the largest expense.
89/90 As of Pro,Jected
Budget 2/28/90 6/30/90
Accmt Arlmin ¢ tq.t)5ft ~ ld nFR
V @ in _nta
Overhead $ 3,329 -0- $ 3,329
Maint./Oper. $ 30,000 $ 7,612 $ 20.848
Veh. Maint./Oper. $ 12,000 -O- $ 5,000
Contingency 'IYees $ 5,000 -0- $ 5,000
iAan RePaY• $ 50,000 -0- $ 50,000
Trail Maintenance $ 5,000 -0- $ 3,000
Contract Serv. $270,000 $215,101 $322,656
Contract Vandalism $ 35,000 -0- $ 35,000
Tree Maint./Cont. Adm. $ 15,000 -0- $ 5,000
Capital N:xpend. $ 10,000 -0- $ 10,000
Water $150,000 $ 62,875 $120,000
uict, i,;c a 1'L,000 $ 3,614 $ 7,500
Park Maint. $142,000 $ 18,849 $ 72.000
Irrigation Restrn. Q 10.000 _0_ $ 5.000
$763,385 $322,106 $678,389
Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91
The protected expenditures for fiscal year 1990/91 will provide for the continued
maintenance of parkways, parks and trails. The square footage to be maintained will
double as the maJority of paztrways in the area of Milliken between Base Line and
Highland have been accepted.
Landscape District 2
Budget
90/91
Admin. $ 17,060
(lvPrhearl $ 2.49$
Maim%Oper. $ 9.700
Veh. Mafnt. $ 11,000
Contract- Routine $346,500
Contract- Vandal. $ 10,000
Capital _0_
Water $170.000
Electric $ 14,000
brig. Res, -0-
Contingency $ 500
Loan Repay. $ 55,458
Cont. Admin. R on igv
Trail Malnt. ~ 38,117
Pazk Maint. 242
$977.949
Due to protected maintenance costs there will be no funding of equ[pment or vehicles
during the 1990/91 fiscal yeaz.
PROJECTED REVENUE
It is estimated there will be 3982 assessment units and approximately 415 acres to be
assessed as vacant land. After review of current expenditures, assessment receipts,
projected maintenance costs the assessment rate for Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91 will
necessitate a 5% increase from $195/unit to $204,75/unit.
Asessment receipts for an}• Pscal year are not rcccivcd until after December 10. A
portion of the estimated carryover funds will be used to fund the district maintenance
costs until January.
3982 A.U. x $ 204.75 =
415 Acres x $ 51.19 =
1989/90 Carryover =
Interest =
Pcnaitiesj~ei. _
TOTAL
$815,315
$ 21,244
$ 75,000
$ 58,833
"/.pots
$977,979
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
$230
5220
5210
$20U
s l9u ~--r~
82/83 83/84 84/85 65/86 86/67 87/86 86/89 89190 90/91
Fiscal Year
-~- Assessment Haies
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
Zone B - Cummercia]/Industrial
The 1990/91 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3-
Zone B (Commercial/Industrial) is prepared in compliance with the
requirements of Paticlc 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of IF~e Streets and Highways
Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Ack of 1972),
:':s rip^rt prcvl~es i.,.onnation outimmg protected costs for fiscal
year 1990/91 for Zone B (Commercial/Industrial), The projected costs aze
used to establish the necessary assessment rate to provide the highest
quality landscaping while maintaining the lowest assessment rate.
Specitlcally, assessments will be used to famish services ~^d mataribis for
the maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of median Islands
within this district. The maintenance of Landscape Maintenance District
No. 3 - 7.one B is considered of general benefit to all pazcels within Zone B
and the costs shall be divided as indicated to this report.
Maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of
all or any part of any median island improvement, providing for the life,
growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, trimming, spraying, fertilizing
or treating for disease or InJury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris
and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and graffiti removal from
areas adtacent to the ruUlvaterl arnac
Median island Improvements within Landscape Maintenance District
No. 3, Zone B were constructed by developers and/or City contract. The
plans for median island improvements are as stipulated in the conditions of
approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division.
Fiscal Year 1989/90 Review
The maintenance of Zone A (Hyssop) continues normal and routine. This
portion of Landscape Maintenance district No. 3 remains constant with
eight parcels. No changes are anticipated for 1990/91.
89/90 As of Projected
Budget 2/28/90 6/30/90
Assmt. Admin. $ 32 $ 32 $ :i2
Maint./Oper. $ 10 -0- $ 10
Veh. Malnt, $ 135 -0- $ 100
Conrad Serv. $1,450 $ 886 $1
450
Water $ 300 $ 152 .
$ 250
Electric $ 150 $ 92 12
$'L,077 $1,162 $1,967
Fiscal Year 1990/91
Assmt. Admin.
Overhead
Mafnt./Oper.
Veh. Maint.
Contract Matnt.
Contract -Vandalism
Water
Electric
PROJECTED REVENUE
8 Assessment Untts ®$258.75 = $2,070
1990/91
Budget
$ 32
C
-0-
-0-
$1,450
$ 44
$ 315
~~
$2,070
After review of expenditures, assessment receipts, projected
expenditures, the assessment rate for 1990/91 will remain at $258.75 per
parcel.
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
ZONE A
HYSSOP
The 1990/91 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3-
Zune n is prepared m compitance with [he requirements of Article 4.
Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code. State of California
(landscape & Ltghtmg Act of 1972).
This report provides information outlinfnF actual mainrnnance costs
for Zone A (Hyssop) for 1989/90 and projected costs for fiscal year
1990(91. The projected costs are used to establish the necessary
assessment rate to provide the highest quality of landscaptng while
maintaining the lowest assessment rate. Assessments wW be used to furnish
services and materials for the maintenance, operation, servicing and
restoration of parkways in the district. The maintenance of Landscape
Maintenance District No. 3 (Zone a) is considered of general benefit to all
parcels within Zone A and the costs shall be divided as Indicated in this
report.
Maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of
ail or anv part Of anv ImnrnvemenL nrnvidtnd fnr rhr lifr, amadh fiaaltfi pn~1
beauty of the landscaptng, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for
disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid
waste. the maintenance, repair and graffiti removal from walls immediately
adjacent to the cultivated areas.
Parkway improvements within Landscap°_ *'.a'..^.fcnunce District No. 3,
7,one A were constructed by the developer. The plans for the improvements
are as stipulated in the conditions of approval far the development and as
approved by the Engineering Division.
Fiscal Year 1989/90 Review
Replacement of trees damaged by wind were replaced during the
current fiscal yeaz. There were no maJor problems with maintenance and
water consumptlon have been reduced.
During fiscal year 1989/90 the following protected were annexed to
Zone B of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 (Commercial/industrial).
ANNF,XED APR!!. fi. 7 QRQ
DR 87-44 1.5 ACRES
DR 87-42 .64 ACRE
A!4NF~'D MAV 17 lOR0
PM 12057 1.81 ACRES
ANNEXED JUNE 7, 1989
DR 88-07 5 ACRES
ANNEXED JUNE 21, 1989
DR 88-25 1.5 ACRES
ANNRXRn . R ii.v 6 l oR0
PM 11891 131.03 ACRES
ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 6, 1989
PM 11852 12,51 ACRES
ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 20, 1989
MDR 89-07 3.82 ACRES
DR 87-48 2,86 ACRES
ANNEXED OCTOBER 4, 1989
DR 88-21 2.27 ACRES
DR 88-14 2,8 ACRES
PM 11222
ANNEXED OCTOBER 10, 1989
DR 87-34 1.7 ACRES
ANNEXED NOVEMBER 1. 1989
PM 12121
PCL 1 2.07 ACRES
PCL 2 1.92 ACRES
PCL 3 3.79 ACRES
DR 78-10 4.6 ACRES
DR 8&43 i.78 ACRES
ANNEXED DECEMBER 6. 1989
DR 88-29 2.34 ACRES
DR 88-32 1.55 ACRES
ANNEXED JANUARY 3, 1990
DR 88-13 6.38 ACRES
CUP 87-29 3.58 ACRES
ANNEXED FEBRUARY 7, 1990
DR 88-19
PM 12058
ANNEXED FEBRUARY 21, 1990
DR 88-I1
Fiscal Year 1990/91
All parcels within Zone B will be assessed on a net acreage basis for
the maintenance of landscaped medians on Haven Avenue from 4th Street to
Deer Creek Channel, Foothill Boulevazd and 4th Street from west to east City
Limits, Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue from 4th Street to Foothill
boulevard, 6th Street from Haven to Rochester Avenue and other median
islands on major divided highways within the Industrial Specific Plan Area
and Footr:ill Boulevard overlay area. For Rscal year 1990/91 the median
island on Haven Avenue from 4th to Deer Creek Channel and other portions
fronting commerctaiimdusuie; u~.~;.,Y.:::;:~i•
Projected 1990/91 Expenditures
aJ,mt an...d.. Pv 720
Overhead $ 255
Maint./Operations $ 13,214
Veh. Malnt./Oper. $ 5.775
Contingency -Trees $ 500
Contract -Vandalism X
Contract - Routine 1 27,283
Tree Maint./Cont. Admin. $ 4,675
Water $ 10.000
Electric ~- -~~
$168,130
After review of expenditures for 1989/90 and projected costs for
1990/91 ft has been determined the assessment rate for Zone B will be
$170 per acre.
989 Acres ~ $170 = $168,130
d
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
$300
5260
5260
$240
$220
$200
88/87 87/88 88/89 89/90 90/91
Fiscal Year
-~- Assessment Ra[es
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
Terra Vista Planned Community
FYscal Yeaz 1990/91
Tt'"' "'^-'-'-~ '^^-r~%~ ~~~ :.Deal yeaz 1990/91 Cor Landscape Maintenance District No.
4 (Terra Vista) is prepared in compliance w7th the requirements of Article 4, Chapter
I, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and
Lighting Act of 1972).
T.`.i~ r;,po:. r:uvlucs ~nformavon ouuining actual maintenance costs for 1989/90
and projected costs for fiscal year 1990/91. The projected costs aze used to establish
the necessary assessment rate to provide the highest quality landscaping and fhe
lowest possible rate. Sgeetfically, assessments will be used to famish services and
materials for the maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of pazkways, parks
and trails within this district. The maintenance of Landscape Maintenance District
No. 4 is considered of general benefit to all areas within the district and the cost shall
be divided as Indicated to this report.
Maintenance of parks, parkways, and trails include the repair, removal or
replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth,
health and beauty of the landscaping, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for
disease or injury; the removal of trimmings. rubbish. dehrla and r,rha~ ~~i~a .,..,,.«.. ..._
waiureuanee, repair and gratfftl removal from wails immediately adjacentyto the
cultivated areas.
Parks, parkways and trails within Landscape Maintenance District no. 4 were
constructed by the developer of the individual subdtvlslcns. The plans and
improvements are as stipulated to the conditions of approval for each development
and as approved by the Engineering Dhtlslon.
Review of Fiscal Year 1989/90
Maintenance during the current 8sca1 yeaz on landscaped areas continued to be
routine. Currently there is $12,750 1n a reserve account for the replacement of trees
lost in maJor storms or disasters. These funds can only be expended upon Council
direction.
During fiscal year 1989/90 the following tracts were annexed to Landscape
Maintenance District No. 4;
ANNEXED October 4, 1989
Tract 13304 59 D.U.
ANNF.7lF:Tl nt..__m,.c: :° :~~.,
Tract 13662 29 D.U.
ANNEXED February 21, 1990
Tract 13664 & -1 28 D.U.
F7sca1 Year 1990/90
Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 contimies to experience normal and routine
maintenance activities. Two pazks (Coyote and Spruce) and being maintained by the
district with the work being perfornied by City Crews. The pazkway maintenance
continues to be handled by a contract maintenance company.
Projected Budget
88 /89 89/90 90/91
Admin.
Assmt $ 11,276 $ 11,276 $ 12,504
.
Overhead $ 1,480 $ 1,480 $ 1,640
Maint./Operations $ 14,000 $ 13,000 $ 2,500
Veh. Maiat./Oper. $ 6,600 $ 1,000 $ 6,000
"'"
Contlngency -Trees ro S,OOC W ~ ~'~'
2
000 =
$ 1
911
Trail Maintenance $
$ 3,209
000
14 $
$ .
10
000 $ ,
4,300
Contract -Vandalism
Contract-Routine $ ,
99,000 $ .
98,000 $ 56,813
Tree Maint./Cont. Adm $ 12,000 $ 7,500 $ 2,693
Capital $ 10,000 $ 10,000 -0-
Water $ 52,000 $ 46,000 $ 50.000
Electric $ 5,900 $ 3.600 $ 5.500
Park Maintenance $1 00,000 $ 40,000 $208,660
Base Line Medians $173.000 $ 173.000 ~_
$141,382 $353,021
i
TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY
ASSESSMENT BENEFIT MATRIX
FISCAL YEAR 1990/91
Medians Parks Parkways
Single Family 1554 A.U. $16,003.25 $91,603.54 $101,769.40
1n WUi'auiiiY
a:ro (uv. @t r atnn 1S
W•v,~~~•-•~ 4~4'] 17A 11
r.- .---~-- @ 47 '?11 Rn
~ --.~__.....
Commercial 113.44 Ac. $ 1.165.48 $ 6.661.35 -0-
Vacant Iand 64.54 Ac. ,$_ 6 1. 2 ~_ -0-
$33,051.00 $185,389.00 $134.581.00
ESTIMATED COSTS
Medtan Maintenance $ 33,051.00
Park Maintenance $ 185,389.00
Parkway Maintenance $ 134,581.00
Benefit Units
Medians Parks Parkways
Single Family 1554 A.U. 1554 A.U. 1554 A.U.
Multi Family 1478 A.U. 1478 A.U. 739 A.U.
Commercial 227 A.U. 227 A.U. -0-
VacantLand 129 A.U. -0- -0-
Single Family
BenefitAssmt. $134.73 X 1554 = $209,370.42
Credits -0
Carryover $24.48 X 1554 = $ 38,041.92
Net Benefit $110.25 $17],328.50
:£
Multi Famffy
Beneft Assmt. $ 91.45 X 1478
Credit -0-
Carryover -0-
Net Benefit $91.45
_ $135,163.10
$135,163.10
Commercial
Benefit Assmt. $ 69.26
Credit -0-
Carryover -0-
Net Benefit $126.57
Vacant Land
Benefit Assmt. $10.25
Credit -0-
Carryover -0-
$10.25
X 113.44 Acres = $7,856.85
$7,856.85 --
X 64.54 Acres = $ 661.54
661.54
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
(Tot Lot)
Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91
The 1990/92 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot) is
~:::.j,i: ~d iP. CCmpHanrP with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of
the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of
1972).
This report provides information outlining actual maintenance costs for 1989/90
and protected costs for fiscal yeaz 1990/91. The pro;ected costs aze used to establish
the necessary assessment rate to provide the highest quality landscaping at the lowest
possible assessment. Specifically, assessments will be used to furnish services and
materials for the maintenance, operaUOn, servicing and restoration of pazkways and
the tot lot within the district, The maintenance of Landscape Maintenance District
No. 5 is considered of general benefit to all azeas in [he district and the cost shall be
divided as indicated in this report.
Maintenance of the tot lot and parkway Include the repair, removal or
replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth,
health and beauty of the landscaping, irtmming, spraying, fertilizing yr treating for
disease or inJury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the
maintenance, repair and graffiti removal from walls immediately adjacent to the
cumvatev areas.
Parkway and tot lot improvements within Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
were constructed by the developers of the individual subdivision. The plans and
pazkways aze as stipulated in the condillons of approval for each development and as
approved by the Engineering Division.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
5160
5150
Si90
$130
$120
$110
5100
85/86 86/87 87/88 86/89 89/90 90/91
Fiscal Year
-~ Assessment Rates
Review of Fiscal Year 1989/90
Maintenance continued normal and routine in Landscape Maintenance District No. 5.
There were no annexations to this dtstrtet during the current fiscal year. The district
was formed with the 44 volts within the tract and there az no plans to expand this
district.
Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91
Projected Budget
87/88 88/89 89/90 90/91
Assmt. Administration $ 176 $ 176 $ 176 $ 176
Overhead -0- -0- $ 23 $ 65
Maint./Operations $ 30 $ 75 $ 75 $ 167
Contingency-frees -O- -0- -0- $ 50
Veh. Malnt./Oper. -0- -0- -0- $ 25
ContractServ. $2,534 $4,836 $3,000 $3,751
Water $ 227 $ 300 $ 200 $ 200
Electric $ 158 $ 108 $ 75 $ 80
Tree Maint./Con. Adm. _0_ -0_ _O_ Q 223
$3,125 $5,495 $3,549 $4 ,737
Th1s district will continue to contain the original 44 volts. After review of
expenditures, assessment receipts, possible carryover ($117) and projected costs,
.1:C :.......n...... :: :II:C f:: F:C~IIS VC.°..` lf•At•/O1 ::in :......°.1.. ~t @1l1F M
Assessment Rate 1990/91
44 Assessment Units X $105 = $4,620
89/90 Carryover $ 117
$4,737
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
~~/~
S16o
Slso
slao
5130
5120
5110
5100
85/86 86/87 87/88 88/89 89/90 90/91
Fiscal Year
-Q- Assessment Rates
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Landscape Maintenance District No. 6
(Caryn Planned Community)
Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91
Tltr 1QA(1/Al arennwl rrntirt fnr Tnnriernnr MM..ta.,~n~o rNcfeirf Tin a
(Caryn Planned Community) is prepared to compliance with the
requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways
Code, State of Calffomia (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
This report provtdes information on actual matntenance costs and
protected costs for fiscal year 1990/91. The projected costs are used to
establish the necessary assessment rate to provide quality landscaping whlle
maintaining or lowering assessments. Assessments will be used to famish
services and materials for the maintenance, operation, servicing and
restoration of parkways within the district. The maintenance of Landscape
Maintenance District No. 6 is considered of general benefit to all aeeas in
the district and the cost shall be divided as indicated in [his report.
Detailed maintenance activities include [he repair, removal or
replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life,
growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, trimming, spraying, fertllizing
a.b j::: j ~ . s...v. .. ..b'.
and other solid waste,Vthe maintenance, repafr~andgraffiti removal from
walls immediately adJacent to the cultivated areas.
Parkway improvements within Landscape Maintenance District No. 6
were constructed by the developers of the indtvidual subdivistons. The plans
and parkways are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each
development and as approved by the Engineering Division.
Review of FYscal Year 1989/90
Parkways for several tracts were assumed for maintenance during
tiscal year 1989/90. The previous problems with plant materials were
corrected and the financial responsibility for maintenance of Phase I have
been taken over by the District.
Budget As of Budget
g4/4n 2/2R/90 90/91
Assmt. Admin. $ 3,756 $ 3,756 $ 4,684
Overhead $ 643 -0- $ '73S
Maint./Oper. $101,430 $91,055 $ 3.000
Veh. Maint./Oper. $ 1,264 -0- $ 1,000
Cont. -Trees $ 5,000 -0- $ 1,000
Trail Mafnt. -0- -0- $ 1,000
Contract -Van. $ 6,400 -0- $ 10,000
Contract -Routine $ 46,000 -0- $242.800
Tree Main/Con, Adm. $ 2,600 -0- $ 4,000
Capital $ 5,000 -0- -0-
Water $ 32,000 -0- $ 15,000
Electric $ 3,000 -0- $ 3,000
brig. Restor. $ 10,000 -0- $ 2,000
-------
$217,092 --------
$94,811 -------
$288,222
There were no tracts annexed Into Landscape Main tenance District
No. 6 during fiscal year 1 989/90.
Fiscal Year 1990/91
Protected 1990/91 Expenditures
Assmt. Administration $ 4,684
Overhead $ 738
Maintenance/Operations $ 3.000
Vehicle Maint./Operations $ 1,000
Contin(!enev-Trees $ 3,000
Trail Maintenance •°: ! ^''
Contract -Vandalism $ 9,000
Contract -Routine $227,360
Tree Maint./Contract Admin. $ 19,440
Capital -O-
`."ater $ 15,923
Electric $ s,uvu
Irrigation Restoration -0-
$288,222
It is estimated [here wtll 1171 assessmenx units wixhin this district
during 1990/91. After review of possible expenditures and assessment
receipts, and protected costs, the assessment rate wll] remain at $195.00.
1990/91 Assessment Rate
1171 X $195.00 = $228,345
89/90 Bud. Carryover = $ 59,877
$288,222
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Landscape Maintenance District No. 6
S3G0
5250
5200
5150
$1C0
87/88 88/89 89/90 90/91
Fiscal Year
-n- Assessment Rates
Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Landscape Maintenance District No. 7
(Ellwanda North)
Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91
The 1990/91 annual report (or Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (Etlwanda
-.~~a.~ 1~ -..-~..n.nR in rmm~lianra aW tfi the rPm ~irrmrntc of ArHrlr 4 (`h ~_r~~. i
Divisfon 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape aad
Lighting Act of 1972).
Thts report provides Information on projected costs sc: ;~,;~ year 1990/91. The
p: ;coed c o sr: iabcu iu esrabifsn the necessary assessment rate to provide
quality landscaping at the lowest assessment rate. Assessments will be used to
furnish services and materials for the maintenance, operation, servicfng and
restoration of parkways with the district. The maintenance of Landscape
Matntenance District No. 7 is considered of general benefit to all azeas m the district
and the cost shall be divided as indicated In this report.
Detalied mahntenance activities ineludc the repair, removal or replacement of alt
or any part of any improvement, providing for the Iffe, growth, health and beauty of
the landscaping, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury; the
~~~6~. a -~~ dole, uae auauaaleumwc, aciaaia
and graffiti removal from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated azeas.
Parkway improvements within Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 were
constructed by the developers of the individual subdivtsions. The plans and
parkways are as stipulated to the conditions of approval for each development and as
approved by the Engineering Division.
Review of F7sca1 Year 1989/90
Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 was formed during fiscal year 1989/90.
No expenses have been incurred. The district was formed on June 21, 1989. The
following tracts have been annexed into this district:
ANNEXED AUGUST 2, 1989
TRACT 12462 27 UNITS
ANNEXED AUGUST 16, 1989
TRACT 12659-1 138 UNITS
TRACT 12870 67 UNITS
ANNEXED OCTOBER 4, 1989
TRACT 13566-1 112 UNITS
TRACT 13566-2
TRACT 13566-3
TRACT 13566-4
ANNEXED NOVEMBER 1. 1989
TRACT 13565-1 132 UNITS
TRACT 13565-2
\C~\V l 1JJVJ-J
TRACT 13565-4
PROJECTED 1990/91 EXPENDITURES
Assmt. Administration $ 2,880
Overhead $ 432
Maintenance/Operations $ 3,000
Veh. Matnt./Operations $ 1,500
Contingency -Trees $ 3,000
Trail Maintenance $ 1.078
Contract -Vandalism $ 2.565
Cuntuet - Ruuiuic 519.955
Tree Maint./Contract Adm. $ 5,094
Water $13, 796
Electric $ 7pp
$54, 000
It is estimated there will be 720 assessment units within landscape Maintenance
District No. 7 during fiscal yeaz 1990/91. To cover the proposed expenditures the
assessment rate will be $75.00
720 A.U. X $75.00 = $54,000
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Landscape Maintenance District No. 8
(Etiwanda South)
Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91
The 1990/91 annual report for landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (Etiwanda
South) 1s prepared in compliance with the requirements of ArOCIe 4, Chapter 1,
Division 5 of the gtreets and Highways Code. State of California (Landscape and
Lighting Act of 1972).
This report provides information on protected costs for fiscal year 1990/91. The
protected costs are used to establish the necessary assessment rite to provide
quality landscaping at the lowest assessment rate. Assessments will be used to
furnish services and materials for the maintenance, operation, servicing and
restoration of parkways within the district. The maintenance of Landscape
Maintenance District No. 8 is considered of general benefit to all aeeas within the
district and the cost shall be divided as indicated to this report.
Detailed maintenance actlv/ties Include the repair, removal or replacement of all
or any part of any Improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of
_ __~' _ _ _ _ c~....:'' _.._ c _ ~'.. a..
.. . ..N::.6, .... ..6, uj..::j'...b. nb ...6 .., :j L: j~
removal of trimmings, rubbish. debris and other solid waste. the maintenance, repair
and graffiti removal from walls immediately adJacent to the cultivated areas.
Parkway Improvements within Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 were
constructed by the developers of the indlvfduaI subdivisions. The plans and
parkways are as sflpulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as
approved by the Engmeertng Division.
Review of F[scal Year 1989/90
Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 was formed during fiscal year 1989/90.
The district was formed on September 20, 1989 with Tract No. 13063. This tract
has 73 assessment units. No other developments have been annexed to date.
IROJECTED 1990/91 EXPENllITURES
Assmt. Admin. $ 2g2
Overhead _p_
Maintenance /Operations $1 ,193
Veh. Maint./Operations $ 25
Contingenrv - T*ees ? 5y!+
Contract -Vandalism $ 510
Contract-Routine $3,402
Tree Maint./Contract Adm. $ 'l13
Water $ 650
Electric $ 150
$6,935
It is estimated there will be 73 assessment units within Landscape Maintenance
District No. 8 during fiscal year 1990/91. To cover the projected expenditures the
assessment rate will be $95.00.
73 A.U. X $95.00 = $6,935
RESOLUTION NO. qD ~ ~V
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS
WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1,
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1990!97
PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF
1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING
OBJECTIONS THERETO
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of
the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of
the State of California, does resolve as follows:
f)ccnriMinn of Werk
SEGTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the
intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Landscape Maintenance
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the fiscal year 1990/91 for the maintenance and
operation of those parkways, parks and facilities thereon dedicated for common greenbelt
purposes 6y deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said Districts.,
Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of parkway maintenance
(including sprinkler systems, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting,
structures and walls, and related facilities) in connection with said districts.
SEGTICdJ 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the roadway
rights-of-way and landscaping easements enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and
more particularly described on maps which are on file in the City Clerk's Office, entitled
"Assessment Diagrams Landscape Maintenance District Nos. t, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8.
SECTION 3: That the contemplated work. in the opinion of said City Council, is of
more than local or ordinary public benefit and the said City Council hereby makes the expense
of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said districts are assessed to pay the costs and
expenses thereof, and which districts are described as follows:
All that cenain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the
exterior boundary tines shown upon that cenain 'Map of Landscape Maintenanw District iJo. i',
"Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 2", Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3",
"Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. d", "Map of Landscape Malntenance District No. 5",
"Map of landscape Maintenance District No. 6", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 7",
and "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 8", indicating by said boundary lines the extent
of the territory included within each assessment district and which maps are on file in the
Office of the City Clerk of said City.
77
CfTY COUNCIL RESOLUTION
WJOSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS
May 2, 7990
Page 2
Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more particular
description of said assessment districts, and the said maps so on file shall govern for all details
as to the extent of said assessment districts.
Reoon of Encineer „~
ao-\T
.CFCTIr1M d• Tho (`~e, !~:_..~a ... ~ n» . w, r~ ., n~_ ~ h_e ~ m.l thn
annual report of the City Engineer which report indicates the amount of the proposed assess-
ments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report
title "Annual Engineer's Report" is on file in the Office of the Ciry Clerk of said City. Reference
to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments
alu' .or the exient of iirn wore.
SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that on the 6th day of June, 1990, at the hour
of 7:30 p.m. in the Ciry Council Chambers in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons
may appear and show reuse why said work should not be done or carried out or why assessments
should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 1990/91. Prctesfs must be in writing and
must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient
to identity the same, and must be delivered Io the Ciry Clerk of said City prior to the time set for
the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest
is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll such protest must contain or be accom-
pametl by written evloence roar sucn signer Is me owner or me properly so oescnoea.
SECTION 5: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in
pursuance of an act of the Iegisialure of the Stale of California designated as the Landspping and
Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Califor-
nia.
SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6961 of the
Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to rho
same. and the Clry Clerk shall cause the same to f>a published 10 days before the date sat for the
hearing, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general clrculatbn published in the
City of Ontario, California, end circuialed in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
-- - ---- CITY OF RANCHO CIJCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
-=:;
DATE: May 2, 1990
T0: Mayor, Members of City Council and City Manager
FROM: in o c'..- -~~• --A _~ .._ r ..,,. _,jci
aY: Bonnie Cabrinha, Special Districts Supervisor
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND SETTING
A PUBLIC HEARING ON JONE 6, 7.990 TU LSVr ~rnc nrvmuar.
ASSESSMENTS AND APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY ENGINF.F.R'S
REPORTS FOR LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3,
~, 5, 6.
RECOP4fENDATI0P7:
Staff recommends that City Council adopt the attached Resolutions
Giving preliminary approval of City Engl.^...er's Repor*_s, declaring
its intention to levy and collect assessments within Street
Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 9, 5 and 6 for Fiscal
veg. 10Qn/4t onA nffa>•i nn a H mo and nlara for a Pnhlir HPaTlnn.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Various adjustments ir. assessment rates are being proposed for
fiscal year 1990/91. Through detailed monitoring of revenue and
expenditures over the past four years patterns Y.ave developed.
Lighting Districts 2 through 6 are basically the same type of
districts and history indicates the assessment rate will ultimately
level out between 515.00 and 520.00 and then increase based on
inflationary pressures. For the next three years an attempt to
reach that goal will allow some districts to have reduced rates.
Lighting Dist r.i ct No. 1 - Arterial
This district has had a rate of $7.52 per unit for several years.
With projected Southern California Edison Co. rate increases it is
recommended the assessment rate be increased to 68.25 per unit.
This will prcvide sufficient funding for fiscal year 1990/91.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
LIGHTING MAINTF,NANCE DISTRICTS
May 2, 1990
Page 2
Lighting District No. 2 - Local
The recommended decrease in assessment rate from 520.00 to 515.00
per unit wiii pa~vidc saffici a,-.t .. ~,~..-r~g by ,.~.ng ...... ryovcrs of
1989/90 aVarlaJJl e. LUt,d~ i nv..u+.~.. .-.. -.._ _--. °^'°^T"° rn FnnA tha
expenditures for 1990/91]
Lighting DistricT. No. 3 - Victoria
•~.t iJVJ/ly ..4rryv .. u~u~ 'i v .... .~ .~.. .. v.~~v:..~.t~~.i nom.... .
proposed assessmentL rat eJ ofy ($i5.00)y~par unit to fund this
district. sufficient funding a7.lows for lowering the rate by 55.00
per unit.
Light i.^.g Ci., ,.ric~ ...,. 9 - .terra Vista
A 1989/90 carryover projection is the basis of loweri rig the
assessment rate within this district to 510.00. This is a $10.C0
decrease in assessments. 9:c believe that the rates will level out
to between 51.5.00 and 520.00 within the near future.
Projected expenditures were not realized the available 19b9/90
carryover projection provides sufficient funds to allow the
assessment rate to be lowered to 51.00 for 1990/91. The excess
carryover is reflective of an error in last year's assessments.
The assessment should have been $20.00. However, a charge of
$35.00 was incorrectly assessed. Next year we will be adjust i.ng
the assessment back to its correct assessment which is
approximately 515.00 per unit.
Lighting District No. 6 - Commer r_ial/Industrial
The recommended assessment rate of 515.00 along with 1989/90
._: i_tii- c.... .~.. ..: Il .........: .i .. ....GG:..:.:~.F F..n rilnn Fns lUUll/UI
avaiiau lc •u..uo .... 1.~........ .. u.... ..., ~.,. ~.. .......... .y .. ,,~ ~~~_. ~~.
As of this date tae have not received any of Scuthern California
Edison's formal street ligh*_ rate estimates. Therefore we have
been very conservative in our estimates to allow for the
possibility of handling incr=axed cost for Street Light
80
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS
May 2, 1990
Page 3
Maintenance. Any carryovers from 1990/91 will be used to maintain
or lower the assessment rates for 1991/92. However we will attempt
to avoid the peaks and valleys of assessment rates we are currently
::peri _..__
R speccfully submitted,
~~,
VJerry B. Fulwood
Deputy City Manager
J5F:de
Attachments
81
EICHIBIT
84/86 86/88 88/87 87/88 89/89 89/90 90/91
Street Light Maintenance 9.64 $8.91 $7.52 $7.52 $7.52 $7,52 $8.25
District 1
Street lAght Maintenance 30.22 $31.7a $2J.Ot1 $23.00 aLG.vO aio.GO
District 2
Streel Light Maintenance $48.65 $48.03 $35.00 $27.00 $20.00 $15.00
Dlstnct 3
Street Light Maintenance $27.14 $32.21 $25.00 $22.00 $20.00 $10.00
District 4
Street Light Maintenance $38.50 $35.00 $35.00 $I.00
District 5
Street Light Mainterance $25.00 $20.00 $15.00
Dlslrict 6
4.]0'
RESOLUTION NO. 9~' /~~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL OF CIIY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2,
3, 4, 5 AND 6
..~ovir cv iq ii,o viir wuioei J. iiro `~niy ::, ,iari::ii0 ~uGdiirouya ii ml.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer
is required to make antl file with the City clerk o7 the city an annual report in writing for which
assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and/or improve-
ment of said Street ugnnng rviaintenance uisrriois ivus. i, 2, 3, 4. 5 and 6.
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the city Clerk of Bald Ciry a
report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which has been presented to this
Council for consideration; and
WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and every pan
thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor
any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is ortleretl as folbws
1 . That the Engineers Estimate of itemized vests and expenses of said work
ane or me mcieentar expenses w cunner:rirni titerewtii, wmeineu iu seiu
report be, and each of them are hereby preliminarily approved and con-
firmed.
2. That the diagrams showing the Assessment Districts referred to an
described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within
said Assessment Districts are hereby preliminarily approved and con-
firmed.
3. That the proposed assessments upon the subdivisions of land in said
Assessment Districts in propodion to the estimated benefit to be received
by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental
expenses thereof, as contained in Bald report Is hereby preliminarily
approved and confirmed.
4. That said report shall stand as the Ciry Engineer's Annual Report for the
fiscal year 1990/91 for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings.
83
Annual Engineers Report
Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1
Arterial Streets
Fiscal Year 1990/91
The annual report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial
c,-....-~..~ 35 _-.-„-.., ~.,A ~., rnn,n/ienro wi}h }h ram~iramrn}_ ni A.+Irlr d ('hanf rr 1
Jl\bb1.01 Y~~. (/W bu u. ~... .y.~ .. P .~
Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and
Lighting Act of 1972)
This report deals with the protected costs for fiscal year 1989/90 and the
projected expenditures for fiscal yeaz 1990/91 to determine annual assessments.
The assessment will be used to furnish services and ntatertals for the ordinary and
_s,~a~ Maintenance as provtded by Southern Callfornla Edison Company. Maintenance
is considered of general benefit to all azeas in the District and costs shah be divided
as indicated !n the body of this report.
Detailed maintenance aeUvlUes include the repair, removal or replacement of all
or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subJect azea.
Street lights were constructed and installed by the developers of the individual
subdivisions. The plans and street lights are as stipulated fn the condfUOns of
approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division.
Fiscal Year 1989/90 Review
89/90 As of Projected
Budget 2/28/90 6/30/90
Assmt. Admin. $ 69,752 $ 69,752 $ 69,752
Overhead $ 2,751 -0- $ 2,751
Capital Expend. $ 13,000 -0- -O-'
Electric $ 49,000 $ 35,666 $ 53,496
Contract Serv. $ 4.172 $ 1.815 $ 3.120
$138.675 $107.233 $129.119
'i.ow bid was ro2000 over budge[. Project not awarded.
During fiscal yeaz 1989/90 the following tracts and lights were annexed Into
Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1:
ANCIEXED APRIL 19, 1989
TRACT 1`1462 27 ASSMT. UNITS
ANNEXED MAY 3, 1989
TRACT 12420 114 ASSMT. UNITS
ANNEXED MAY 17, 1989
PM 12057 3.62 ASSMT. UN[TS
ANNEXED JiJNE 7. 1989
DR 88-07 1 ASSMT UNIT
'1'}LAC 1- 13sba b AJSmi uidfTS
ANNEXED JUNE 21. 1989
UR SS-25 3 ASSMT UN[15
ANNEXED JULY 5, 1989
PM 11891 262.06ASSMT UNITS
ANNEXED AUGUST 2, 1989
PIvi 12218 3 ASSA3T UNITS
ANNEXED AUGUST 16, 1989
111 J/JV
T
l1V Vl~~I
V1~31~!
ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 6, 1989
PM 11852 22 ASSMT UNITS
PM 12573 2 ASSMT UNITS
CUP 87-05 10 ASSMT UNITS
'TRACT 13873 124 ASSMT UNITS
ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 20, 1989
DR 87-48 5.72 ASSMT UNITS
MDR 89-07 7.64 ASSMT UN[TS
TRACT 13565-1 TO 4 132 ASSMT UNITS
ANNEXED OCTOBER
4
, 1989
~
n
iLUiVT i3JW-1 TV 3 112 ASSiv/T UlVI1J
TRACT 13737 12 ASSMT UNITS
TRACT 12820 16 ASSMT UNITS
PM 11838 2 ASSMT UNITS
TRACT 13304 59 ASSMT UNITS
DR 88-21 5 SSMT UNITS
DR 88-14 5.6 ASSMT UNITS
ANNEXED OCTOBER 18, 1989
DR 87-34 3 ASSMT UNITS
TRACT 13810 7 ASSMT UNITS
ANNEXED NOVEMBER 1, 1989
DR 89-10 9.2 ASSMT UNITS
PM 11685 3 ASSMT UN[TS
PM 12121 15.56ASSMT UN[TS
TRACT 13930 23 ASSMT UNITS
DR 88-43 3.56 ASSMT UN[TS
ANNEXED NOVEMBER 15, 1989
TRACT 13662 29 ASSMT UNITS
TRACT 13813 6 ASSMT UNITS
ANNEXED DECEMBER 6, 1980
PM 9431 5.85 ASSMT UNITS
TRACT 14121 47 ASSMT UNITS
DR 88-32 3.1 ASSMT UNITS
DR 88-29 4.68 ASSMT UNITS
ANNEXED JANUARY 3, 1990
DR 88-13 12.76ASSMT UNITS
CUP 87-29 7.16 ASSMT UNITS
TRACT 13851 61 ASSMT UNITS
TRACT 13621 7 ASSMT UNITS
eiiviv~ncu ri:,iiniiAni i, roar
DR 88-19 12.08ASSMT UNITS
TRACT 13886 23 ASSMT UN[TS
PM 11394 18.74ASSMT UNITS
PM 12058 7.58 ASSMT UNITS
ANNEXED FEBRUARY 21, 1990
TRACT 13664 & -1 28 ASSMT UNITS
DR 88-11 .80 ASSMT UN[TS
ANNEXED MARCH 7. 1990
TRACT 13890-1 & -2 166 ASSMT UNITS
PROJECTED 1990/91
EXPENDITURES
Assmt. Admin. $ 57,760
Overhead $ 3,155
Electric $ 58.215
$119,130
PROJECTED REVENUE
14440 A.U. x $8.25 = $119,130
A protected $69,282 1989/90 carryover will fund this district until assessments are
received in January, 1991.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Street Light Maintenance No. 1
aav
S9
$8
$7
84/85 BS/86 86!87 87/88 88/89 89/90 90/91
Fiscal Year
-~ Assessment Rates
Annual Engineer's Report
Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2
Local Streets
Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91
The annual report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (Local
c.~.,,,«.1 n- -...........,i ~., ..mm~lt~nnn pith thr rnm drnmant ~f Arti_rlr 4 (`h^n~nr 1
...........a ... a.-_rW .,.- ___ __-_~-._..__ .... ............
Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972).
This report deals with the protected costs for fiscal yeaz 1989/90 and the
minr}rrl amenlJltprP_.S fnr flsral year 1990/91 to determine annual assessments.
Y J"
The assessment will be used to furnish services and materials for the ordinary and
usual maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of street light
improvements as provided by Southern California Edison Company. Maintenance
is considered of general benefit to all azeas within the District and costs shall be
divided as Indicated to the body of this report.
Detailed maintenance acUvtUes Include the repair, removal or replacement of
all or any part of any Improvement providing for illumination of the subject area.
Street lights were constructed and installed by the developers of the Individual
subdivisions. The plans and street lights are stipulated in the condlUons of
main vvni ian cna.ia aic vcw~aucui aaau m aia~awcu iay uac uugiuccaiug iiviaiw ~.
Review of Fiscal Year 1989/90
89/90 As of Protected
Hudget 2/28/90 6/30/90
Assmt. Admin. $20,268 $20,268 $20,268
Overhead $ 2,027 -0- $ 2,027
Electric $60,000 $31,233 $53,160
Contract Serv. ~ 4.565 $ 1.986 $ 3.408
$86,860 $53,487 $78.863
During fiscal year 1989/90 the following developments and lights were
annexed mto Street Lighting Maintenance Distrlet No. 2:
ANNEXED APRIL 19. 1989
TRACT 12562 27 ASSMT UNITS
ANNEXED MAY 3, 1989
TRACT 12420 114 ASSMT UNITS
TRACT 13748 102 ASSMT UNITS
ANNEXED JUNE 7, 1989
TRACT 13359 6 ASSMT UNITS
ANNEXED AUGUST 2. 1989
p??? i99.tR 3 ASSMT UNITS
ANNEXED AUGUST 16, 1989
PM 5996 4 ASSMT UNITS
AN-HEXED SEPTEMBER 6, 1989
PM 12573 2 ASSMT UNITS
CUP 87-OS 10 ASSMT UNITS
ANNEXEll SEl'PEMBER 20, 19$9
TRACT 13565-i TO -4 132 ASSMT UNITS
HIVIVP.AGV Vl.1V~GR 4, iao9
TRACT 13566-1 & -3 112 ASSMT UNITS
TRACT 13727 12 ASSMT UN[TS
TRACT 12$20 16 ASSMT UNITS
DR 87-34 3 ASSMT UNITS
ANNEXED OCTOBER 18, 1989
TRACT 13810 7 ASSMT UNITS
ANNEXED NOVEMBER 1, 1989
PM 11685 3 ASSMT UNITS
TRACT 13930 23 ASSMT UNITS
ANNEXED NOVEMBER 15, 1989
I RrHCT 13$13 6 AC~iJMl IJ NIIJ
ANNEXED DECEMBER 6, 1989
PM 9431 5.88 ASSMT UNITS
ANNEXED JANUARY 3, 1990
TRACT 13851 61 ASSMT' UNITS
TRACT 13621 7 ASSMT UNITS
ANNEXED MARCH 7, 1990
TRACT 13890-1 & -2
166 ASSMT UNITS
PROJECTED 1990/90
Assmt. Admin.
Overhead
Electric
$19, 524
~ 2.327
565.851
$86, 851
After review of current expenditures, protected revenue and possible carryover
($134,721) it has been deternttned that the assessment rate for Street Lighting
Maintenance District No. 2 can be lowered to $9.00 from $20.00 for fiscal year
1990/91
The protected cazryover funds will be used to support this dtstrtct until
assessments are received in January. Lowering the assessment rate will still
provide sufficient funding for this district
4881 Assmt. Units x
Carryover
1/2 of 90/91
$15.00 = $73,215
$134,721.17
(43,425.50)
si-tiss.s~-
90/91 Budget
90/91 Assmts.
(86,851.00)
$ 4,444.67
$ 43.929.00
$ 48,373.67
The protected $48,373.67 will be used to fund the first have of ftscal year
1991/92.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Street Light Maintenance District Na. 2
sao
sin
Szo
sio
85/86 88/87 87/88 88/89 89/9a 90/91
Fiscal Year
-~- Assessment Rates
Annual Engineer's Report
Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3
(Vfetorla Planned Community)
Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91
The annual report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria
Planned Ccmmunity) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4,
Chapter 1, Di+ision 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California
(l..andscaping and Lighting Act of 1972).
This report outlines the projected costs for fiscal year 1989/90 and the
protected expenditures for fiscal year 1990/91 to determine the necessary
assessment rate. The assessments wlll be used to furnish services and materials for
the ordinary and usual maintenance, operatlon, servicing and restoration of street
light improvements as provided by Southern California Edison Company.
Maintenance is considered to be of general benefit to all azeas within the district and
costs shall be divided as Indicated 1n the body of this report.
Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of all
or any part of any improvements providing for the 111um1natron of the subject area.
Street lights were construMed and installed by the developers for the individual
subdivisions. The plans and street lights are as stipulated to the conditions of
approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division.
Fiscal Yeaz 1989/90 Review
Assmt. Admin.
Overhead
Electric
Contract Serv.
89/90 As of Projected
Budget 2/28/90 6/30/90
$13,928 $13,928 $13,928
$ 1,393 -0- $ 1,393
$48,000 $29,612 $50,760
$ 3.910 1 7 1 $ 2.928
$67,`l31 $45,241 $69,009
During fiscal yeaz 1989/90 the following projects within the Victoria Planned
Community were annexed into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3:
ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 6, 1989
TRACT 13873
ANNEXED OCTOBER 4, 1989
PM 11838
n niNFXNT) t)F.rF.MRF,R ~, 7PRR
TRACT 14121
ANNEXED FEBRUARY 7, 1990
TRACT 13886
PM 11394
62 ASSMT UNITS
2 ASSMT UNITS
47 ASSMT UNITS
23 ASSMT UNITS
18.74ASSMT UNITS
Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 experienced normal and routine
expenditures during the current fiscal year.
Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91
Projected Expenditures
Assmt Admin. $15,848
Overhead $ 1,742
m~< .,~~
i:~ic~iu~.
$72,790
After review of expenditures, protected revenue, and projected carryover funds
($85,218) it has been determined that the assessment rate for Street Lighting
Maintenance District No. 3 can be lowered from $20.00 to $15.00 -per assessment
unit.
The projected carryover funds will be used to support this district until the
assessments aze received during January.
3962 A.U. x $15.00 = $59,430
Carryover $85,218
1/290/9I Bud. (36,395)
$48,823 -~
90/91 Budget (72,790)
(23.967)
90/91 Assmts. $64.382
$40.415
The projected $40,415 will be used to fund the first half of fiscal yeaz 1991/92
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Street Light Maintenance District No. 3
ss~
$30
$20
$ ]. 0
Fiscal Year
-~- Assessment Rates
85/86 86!87 87/68 88/89 89/90 90/91
Annual Engineer's Report
Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4
Terra Vista Planned Community
Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91
The annual report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista
Planned Gommunil j Is re aced m cum ~iaucc wiui is "^" ^f ^^~•^~^_
4, Chapter 1. Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of Calsfornia
(Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972).
This report deals with the projected costs for fiscal year 1989/90 and the
pl ojccicli capcuviiure~ far .fiec_l year 1990/91 to determine the annual
assessment rate. The assessments will be used to furnish sernces and maceriais
for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of
street light improvements as provided by Southern Calttomta Edison Company.
Maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and costs
shall be divided as indicated 1n the body of this : -port.
Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of
all or any part of any improvement providing for llluminatron of the subject area.
Street lights were constructed by the developers for the individual subdivisions.
The plans and street tights aze as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each
neveiopmenr anti as appruved i,y WC ml~luccl ink uivi~iuu.
Fiscal Yeaz 1989/90 Review
89/90 As of Projected
Budget 2/28/90 s/30/90
Assmt. Admin. $11,352 $11,352 $11,352
Overhead $ 1,135 -0- $ 1,135
Electric $33,000 $10,307 $21,600
Contract Serv. ~ 1.789 $ 778 $ 1.560
$47,275 $22,437 $35,647
Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 experienced normal and routine
expenditures durin6 th~^ current fiscal year. During fiscal year 1989/90 the
follow[ng projects were annexed to this district:
ANNEXED OCTOBER 4, 1989
TRACT 13304 59 ASSMT UNITS
ANNEXED NOVEMBER 15, 1989
'1'RAt;'1' 13(162
ANNEXED FEBRUARY 21. 1990
TRACT 13664 9e -1
143 ASSMT UNITS
28 ASSMT UNITS
FISCAL YEAR 1990/91
Protected Expenditures
Assmt Admin. $ 7,124
~vernead ~ i,4vi
Electric $35.000
$43.526
After review of current expenditures, protected carryover ($106,436),
protected expenditures and revenue it has been determined that the assessment
rate for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 for fscal year 1990/91 can be
lowered from $20.00 to $10.00 per assessment unit.
A portfon of the protected carryover will be used to fund this district until
assessments aze received in January.
Projected Revenue
1781 x $10.00 = $17,810
Carryover $106,436
1/2 of 90/91 (21,763)
90/91 Budget (43,526)
$41,147
90/91 Assmts. $1'!,810
$58,957
1"he protected $58,957 will fund the first six months of fiscal yeaz 1991/92.
s
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Street Light Maintenance District No. 4
saa
Sao
S2o
S10
h~
85/86 86/87 87/88 88/89 89/90 90/91
Fiscal Year
~-®-- Assessment Rates
Annual Engineer's Report
Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5
Caryn Planned Communty
Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91
The annual report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned
Community) is prepazed in compliance with the requirement of Article 4. Chanter 1
Di~tision 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972).
This report deals with the projected costs for fiscal year 1989/90 and the
projected CwyCndttUrio fOr liSl'al yCal ijyVJ yl LU UCLCLIIllI1C IJ1C d1ltlYtU 4oxbaniWR
rate. The assessments will be used to famish services and materials for the ordinary
and usual maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration oi' street light
improvements as provided by Southern Califomia Edison Company. Maintenance is
considered of general benefit to all azeas within the district and costs shall be
divided as indicated in the body of this report.
Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of all
or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subJect azea.
Street lights were constructed and installed by the developers for the individual
subdivisions. The plans and street Hghts are as stipulated In the conditions of
approval for each development and as approved by fhe Engineering Division.
Review of Fiscal Year 1989/90
89/90 As of Projected
Budget 2/28/90 6/30/90
Assmt. Admin. $ 3.756 $3,756 $ 3,756
Overhead $ 470 -0- $ 470
Electric $ 8,000 $2,811 $ 5,640
Contract Serv. $ 343 $ 150 $ 300
$12,569 $6,717 $10,166
Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 experienced normal and routine
expenditures during the current fiscal year. The following tracts were annexed to
the district during 1989/90:
ANNEXED JUNE 7, 1989
TRACT 13745 102 ASSMT UNITS
TRACT 13858 61 ASSMT UNITS
TRACT 13857 69 ASSMT UNITS
Fisca] Year 1990/91
Projected Expenditures
Assmt. Admin. $ 4,680
Overhead $ 538
Electric $ 8,000
$13,218
After review of current expenditures, projected cazryover ($58,511), projected
expenditures and revenue it has been determined that the assessment rate for
Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 for fiscal year 1990/91 can be lowered
from $'20.00 to $1.00.
A portion of the projected carryover will be used to Fund this district until
aJJCJJU3Clll 1CCClpW A1C ICI:CIVCU LL1 UAl1UAly.
Projected Revenue
1170x $1.00
Carryover
1/2 of 90/91
_ $5,850
$58,511
(6,609]
$51,902
90/91 Budget
90/91 Assmts.
(13, 684)
$38,684 --
$5,850
$44, 534
The projected $39,854 will fund this district for the first six months of fiscal
year 1991/92 and provide sufficient funds to maintain the lower rate for
approximately three yeazs.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Street Light Maintenance District No. 5
S90
W S30
d
Y
M
Cy S20
G
N
N
d
tll
Q $10
SO
87/88 88/89 89/90 90/91
Fiscal Year
-~- Assessment Rates
Annual Engineer's Report
Street lighting Maintenance District No. 6
Commercial/ Industrial
Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91
The annual report for Street Lighting Mafntenance District No. 6
(Commercial/Industrial) fs prepared in compliance with the requirement of
Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5, of the Streets and Highways Code, State of
California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972).
This report deals with the projected costs for fiscal year 1989/90 and the
projected expenditures for fiscal year 1990/91 to determine the annual
assessment rate. The assessments will be used to furnish services and materials
for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operations, servicing and restoration of
street light improvements as provided by Southern California Edison Company.
Maintenance is considered to be of general benefit to all azeas in the district and
costs shall be divided as indicate din the body of this report.
Street Lighting Mafntenance Distrtet No. 6 was established for Commercial
and/or Industrial properties mainly within the Industrial and Foothill Specific
Plan azeas. Areas Included in the work program are the street lights within the
rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the Clty and are
11111114U lV IV40f J441 W. X114 Y, n t/1 V~f 0l1lJ 4/14fYU4J 1f WfaN~44 V Y~f1W
in rights-of-way of major streets. Detailed maintenance activities include the
repair, removal or repiacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for
the illumination of the subject area.
Street lights were constructed and installed by the developers for the
individual projects within the district. The plans and street lights are as
stipulated 1n the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by
the Engineering Division,
Fiscal Yeaz 1989/90 Review
89/90 As of Projected
Budget 2/28/90 6/30/90
Assmt. Admin. $2,272 $2,272 $2,272
Overhead $ 284 -0- $ 284
Electric $4.200 $ 800 X2.000
$6,756 $3,072 $4,556
The following projects were annexed to Street Lighting Maintenance District
No. 6 during Hscal yeaz 1989/90:
ANNEXED MAY 17, 1989
PM 12057 1.81 ACRES
ANNEXED JUNE 7, 1989
DR 88-07 5 ACRES
ANNElSE1J Ji1lV~ G1, iya9
DR 88-25 L5 ACRES
ANNEXED JULY 5, 1989
PM 11891 131.03 ACRES
ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 6, 1989
PM 11852 12,51ACRES
ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 20,1989
MDR 89-07 3.82 ACRES
DR 87-48 2.86 ACRES
ANNEXED OCTOBER 4, 1989
DR SS-21 2.27 ACRES
DR 88-14 2.50 ACRES
vr~n nn~rnnnn . a .non
~,.,~~..~,.~DR 87-34 ~•` ~~~ •JVU
1.7
ACRES
ANNEXED NOVEMBER 1, 1989
DR 89-10 4.6 ACRES
DR 88-43 1.78 ACRES
PM 12121 7.78 ACRES
DR 88-32 1.55 ACRES
ANNEXED DECEMBER 6, 1989
DR 88-29 2.34 ACRES
ANNEXED JANUARY 3, 1990
DR 88-13
lniUP V7 29
- 6.38
n Ln
J.JO ACRES
AI.RGJ
ANNEXED FEBRUARY 7, 1990
DR 88-19 6.04 ACRES
PM 12058 3.79 ACRES
ANNEXED FEBRUARY 21, 1990
DR 88-11 .40 ACRES
F1sca1 Yeaz 1990/91
Protected Expenditures
Assmt Admin. $ 5.568
Overhead S 317
Electric $ 4.500
$10.385
The rate of development and acceptance of street lighting within Street
Lightmg Maintenance District No. 6 determine the actual expenditures of energy
chazges. It has been determined that an assessment rate of $8.00 per assessment
umt wtii he necessary io cover co protecred expenattures.
Protected Revenue
1392 A.U. x $15.00 = $20,880
Carryover $10,566
1 J2 of 90/91 Bud. (5,193)
$ 5,373
90/91 Budget (10,385)
(5,012)
90(91 Assm[s. $20,880
$15.868
The protected $6,124 wtll be used to fund th e first six months of fiscal year
1991/92.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Street Light Maintenance District No. 6
>LO
$29
$22
$20
S18
516
S1~
8B/89 89/90 90/91
Fiscal Year
-~ Assessment Rates
RESOLUTION NO. 9Q - ~O~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS
WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS
NUS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 6 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
1990/91 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND
LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND
PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECilONS THERETO
The City Council of the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of
the landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of
the State of California, does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the
intention of this City Council to lery and collect assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 for the fiscal year 1990/91 for the maintenance and
operation of those parkways, parks and facilities thereon dedicated for common greenbelt
purposes by deed or recorded subdNision tract map within the boundaries of said Districts.
Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of straet lighting maintenance
(including repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for
illumination of the subject area) in connection wnh said districts.
SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the roadway
rights-of-way and easements enumerated in fhe repon of the City Engineer and more par-
ticularly described on maps which are on file in the City Clerk's Office, entitled "Assessment
Diagrams Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.
SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinbn of said City Council, is of
more than local or ordinary public benefit, antl the said Ciry Council hereby makes the expense
of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said districts are assessed to pay the costs and
expenses thereof, and which districts are described es follows:
All that certain territory of the Gry of Rancho Cucamonga included within the
exterior boundary ones shown upon that cenain "Map of Sireei Lighting Mainienanue District
No. 1", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2", Map of Street Lighting Maintenance
District No. 3", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4", "Map of Street Lighting
Malntenance District No. 5", and "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6", Indicating
by said bouMery lines the extent of the territory Included within each assessment dlstrid and
which maps are on file in the Office of the Ciry Clark of said City.
~~U
cmcouNCILRESOLUnoN
STREET tJGHTING MAINT. DISTRICTS
May 2, 1990
Page 2
Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more particular
description of said assessment districts, and the said maps so on file shall govern for all details
as to the extent of said assessment distdcts.
ye,lwt
•• ~... n_-Mueinn Nn lhac wmerrnr,xl thn
Jtlil IVIV 4[ IIIC 411y txml M~ ~i .a .~. .r .. _ .
annual report of the City Engineer which report indicates the amount of the proposed assess-
ments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report
title "Annual Engineer's Report" is on file in the Office of the Ciry Clerk of said Cily. Reference
to said report is hereby made for all particulars for tha amcunt and extent of the assessments
a..J 6.1 ;,,e deiaPii of iha work.
SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that on the 6th tlay of June, 1990, at the hour
of 7:30 p.m. in the Giry Council Chambers in the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons
may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why assessments
should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 1990/91. Protests must be in writing and
must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is Interested, sufficient
to identity the same, and muss be delivered to the City Clerk of said Ciry prior to the time set for
the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest
1s not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll such protest must contain or be accom-
panied by written evidence that such signer Is the owner of the properly so eescrloee.
SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in
pursuance of an act of the legislature of the Slate of California designated as the Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Califor-
nia.
SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 8961 of the
Government Code. Tha Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the
came, end tha City flerk Shall raase the lama tQ [>!} pt)blighed 10 days before the date get fpr the
hearing, at least once In The Daily Repcn, a newspaper of general circulation published in the
Ciry of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
/09
CITY OF RANCAO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 2, 1990
TD: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Nalter C. Stickney, Associate CTvil Engineer
SL'DJEC?• nFS~ruaTlnN DF STRANG LANE AS A PRIVATE STREET AND
EXEMPTING THE ADUTTING PROPERTIES FROM REQUIREMENTS SET FOR
IN CHAPTER 12.08 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE
It is recommended that the C1ty Council adopt Lhe attached Resolution
designating Strang Lane as a private street and exempting the abutting
properties from requirements set for to Chapter 12.08 of the Municipal
Code.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Proj ects which are adjacent to streets that have rwt bean previously
deterniined by the City as private are required t0 dedicate any needed
right-of-way far the construction of pu611c improvements and, unless
-' ~ .. Lo ^+'^+^^_t °!±@ ^~ ~~~° arP ronllirPd to construct needed
improvements within these public rights-of-way. These requirements had
become the focal point of objections by owners of property on certain
residential streets, particularly 1n the Alta Loma section of the city,
as they developed their property. Their contention was that, because
these streets were unique fn nature and are of substandard design and
construction, that the imprevement of the street would have a negative
effect on the abutting property and the streets should remain private.
Because of these concerns, on July 5, 1989, the City Council adopted an
Ordinance which established a mechanism for the review and determination
of whether a street could be designated as a Private Residential
Street. This would thereby exempt the abutting properties to these
streets from the requirements set for in the Municipal Code for the
dedication of public right-of-way and the construction of public
1~~~rn vaaortg,
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
STRANG LANE
NAY 2, 1990
PAGE 2
This action regarding Strang Lane was triggered by a property owner who,
when applying for a building peralt, was informed Lhat an irrevocable
offer to dedicate was required prior to the issuance of a bull ding
permit. The owner contended that Strang Lane, which his property abuts,
was private and that the offer to dedicate requirement would rwt
pertain. The owner was then informed by staff that the offer to dedicate
was indeed required by the Municipal Code, however, per Ordinance 58-C, a
, e,icw d-d :.', ~..~,^I^_~1nn ~.rv hP Ili Ao hV }hp f,{}V rM10Gil a5 }n thB
exemption of certain requirements.
The owner subsequently submitted a petition of 9 owners of property
abutting Strang Lane (6GY of the total parcels affected). The petition
requests that the City Council make a determination at this time.
Re ly submitted,
•dlw
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO. QO-~~~y
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING STRANG LANE AS A
PRIVATE STREET AND EXEMPTING THE ABUTTING PROPERTIES FROM
REQUIREMENTS SET FOR IN CHAPTER 12.OA OF THE MUNICIPAL
CODE
' c el Ly bVV11L a or` the pity or Rancno Cucamonga has decided
that certai~n~residential streets, being unique in nature, function as private
residential street; and
WHEREAS, the City Council Has decided that properties aoutttng
private streets should be exempted from certain requirements noreatly
attributable to public streets; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted Ordinance No. 58-C creating and
establishing the authority to designate certain streets as private residential
streets.
WHEREAS, the City Council finds as Yoilows:
A. A portion of Strang Lane, situated from Carnelian Street to the
'-' •'i YY~ J v / ~.FV Li Y11 VI LIIC
requirements set forth in Chapter 12.08.055 of theVRancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code;
B. The designation of said portion of Strang Lane as a Private
Residential Street will not adversely affect the health, safety or welfare of
those persons and properties adjacent to, and in the vicinity of, such street;
C. That a Private Residential Street designation for said portion of
Strang Lane is in conformity with the General Plan;
NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, Hereby resolves as follows:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: Said portion of Strang Lane located between Carnelian
Street to a eas r1y terminus of Strang lane 1s hereby designated as a
private street and the abutting properties are exempted from the requirements
set forth from the provisions of Chapter 12.08 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code.
SECTION 3: With the designation of that portion of Strang Lane as a
privates ree shall ,join the list of so designated private streets set
forth on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated hereto by reference.
II 1
RESOLUTION N0. QO-~~~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING STRANG LANE AS A
PRIVATE STREET AND EXEMPTING THE ABUTTING PROPERTIES FROM
REQUIREMENTS SET FOR, IN CHAPTEP. 12.08 OF THE MUNICIPAL
CODE
~ru
iiHcREnJ, Tne City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has decided
that certain residential streets, being unique in nature, function as private
residential street; and
iin~nEi.S, the City Council nas decided that properties abutting
private streets should be exempted from certain requirements normally
attributable to public streets; and
NNEREAS, the City Council has adopted Ordinance No. 58-C creating and
establishing the authority to designate certain streets as private residential
streets. ~~
NHEREAS, the City Council finds as fo~.daws:
,
A. A portion of Strang Lane, situated frogiCarnel an Street to the
easterly terminus of Strana Lane (aoornximx alv t7nn " ,11 ,.s rHe
requirements set forth in Chapter 12.08.055 ~of the Rancbo'/Cucamonga Municipal
Code;
B. The designation of said portion of Strang Lane as a Private
Residential Street will not adversely affect the health, safety or welfare of
those persons and properties adJacent to, and in the vicinity ot', such street;
C. That a Private Residential Street designation for said portion of
Strang Lane is 1n conformity with the General Plan;
NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, Nereby resolves as follows:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: Said portion of Strang Lane located O~tweert'Carnelian
Street to a eas rly terminus of Strang Lane is hereby designated as a
private street and the abutting properties are exempted from the requirements
set forth from the provisions of Chapter 12.08 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code.
SECTION 3: Nith the designation of that portion of Strang Lene as a
private s ree , shall loin the list of so designated private streets set
forth on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
I I eY
E%HIBIT "A"
DESIGNATED PRIVATE STREETS
Name of Street Portion of Street
1. Strang Lane Carnelian Street to 1300' east
!3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT ~-
GATE: May ?, 1990 ~ I
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brad huller, City Planner
BY: Lx rry J. Henderson, Prinr.i nal Pla nnPr
SL'°JEC T: C06"iNiI TY OEV ELu"rriEitT oiOCk ~RNNI APPLICATION PROGRAM YEAR
t 990-91 - The adoption of the final Statement of Conunity
Development Objectives for program year 1990-91 and the
preliminary selection of projects based on an anticipated grant
of E463 ,006.00
RECOMMENDATION: It is recomne nd ed that the City Council take the following
actions:
a. Receive for discussion and public input the Final Statement of
Objectives and Projected Use of funds (Final Statement) for the
Community Development Block Grant (COBG) program year 1990-91;
b. Adopt the attached Resolution approving the Final Statement, making
all findings, dete rm ina tf ohs, and certifications and adopting all
policies therein, and authorizfng the Mayor to submit the Final
Statement, and any amendments thereto, and to act in connection with
the submission of the Final Statement and to provide such additional
ABSTRACT: The Citizens' Participation Plan provides that the City Council
hold an advertised public hearing prior to approving Lhe Final Statement for
the CDBG Program. Notice of the public hearing was published in The Oa ily
Report. Following the pu6l is hearing, staff will amend the Final Statement,
if necessary, as directed by the City Council, and submit the Final Statement
to the U.S. Oepa rtment of Housing and Urban Deveiopment (HUD).
BACKGROUND: On March 21, 1990, the City Council he]d a public hearing to
discuss the community's objectives for the Community Oevelopment Block Grant
(C68G) program and to set priorities among the projects suggested by City
staff, community organizations, and residents. Following the public hearing,
the City Council approved the Preliminary Statement of Community Development
06jectives and directed staff to prepare a Finai Statement of Community
IIP VP Inn111P f1T Ilh lPf+IVPC roll Vnn in~f o,l Ilfn of C~~nAe uF in« •n.~l..Ann 0.n Intl nin<_..
activities: __„___..__ _.._ .. _„ ___ .._~ _. .,.,,.....,,,,,, ,,,,,.,.,,~, ~„~ ,,,~~,,,, l,y
a. Housing Rehabilitation ; 80,000
h. Historic Preservation incentives 20,100
c. Southwest Cucamonga Street Improvements ?40,000
d, Senior Shared Housing 6,300
e. Administration 86.600
TOTAL `;433,000
~~~
CITY COUNC A STAFf REPORT
CGBG APPLICATION FY 1990-91
May 2, 1990
Page 2
Subsequent to the public hearing, HUD notified City staff that a minimum of
$25,000, up to $30,000, Will be allocated to the City in addition to the
$433,000 previously anticipated. The final figure depends upon the recapture
of certain funds previously allocated by the U.S. Congress for other federal
programs. HUO has requested that the City make its selection of projected
activities based upon an anticipated grant of $463,000. Staff recommends that
Lhe additional funds be allocated in tno fnilowi^.g ma.,.._..
a. Support of ge ne rai administration and capacity building activities
for the Planning Division such a5 the development and modification of
general and specific plans; environmental, traffic, and other
studies; and clearinghouse functions. $6,000 is the maximum amount
of the additional CDBG award which may be used for such purposes.
Project Funding: $ 6,000
6. Establishment of a contingency fund until such time as the City
Council deems it appropriate to allocate these funds to existing or
new activities.
Project funding: $24,000
The rec omne nd ed Projected Use of Funds allocates a minimum of 89 percent of
the 1990-91 C08G allocation to activities which benefit lower-income
persons. There are no LDBG funds received in prior years which are currently
not allocated to ongoing activities. No CDBG program income is anticipated to
An ~ ~~l.A l.. C .. A.. a
__ _._..-.. ... ..,. .]~ ,..., ..y ~~ ]Eon.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: A71 of the proposed projec is are continuing
projects which have, in previous years, been reviewed for compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA). All of the proposed projects are exempt from CEQA
review. All of the projects have been previously reviewed for compliance with
NEPA and found to have no significant environmental impacts, contingent upon
the implementation of mitigation measures regarding flood insurance and
historic preservation review previously adopted by the City Council.
CONCLUSION: The actions rec omne nded above are adequate to meet all pre-
submission requirements for the CGBG Program in order fnr the City to receive
its 1990-91 CDBG program year entitlement. Upon the submfssion of the Final
Statement, Lhe funds will be made available to Lhe Lity on or about July 1,
i99 ri.
Res f ully tt
Bra er
City tanner
BB:LJH/j fs 'IS
Attachment: Exhibit "A" - Final Statement of Cgmmunity
Resolution of Approva~pment Objectives
Final Statement of
Community Objectives for the 1990-91
Community Development
Block Grant Program
CRy of Rancho Cucamonga
Nnuaiw ,~ssoa~,hs
e+creas a air+tns
,//III,.,yN,MwFl~f~ gYMMI
May, 1980
x~~':
rl ~
FINAL STATEMENT OF
nnwn~~rrwnmv ncwmr nnwmw.m nn mnmrrma.
.,... ...w.. ....
AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS
FOR THE 199091 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MAY 1990
('
TABLF. OF CONTENTS
~~
I. STANDARD APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE 1
II. INTRODUCTION 2
III. COMMUNI'T'Y DEVEI.oPMENT PLAN 4
IV. FINAL STATEMENT CF COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT OBJECTTVIS 5
l1 DDnTi'r('CT ITCL Y~C tT TAfIIC 't
V[. POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO FLOOD PLAINS AND
PROPOSED MI'T'IGATION MEASURES it
VII. STATEMENTS OF POLICY 14
h Citizens' Participation Plaa 14
B. Relocation Assistance Plan 15
C. Residential Anti-Displacement Plan 16
D. Criteria for Substantial Change 18
VIII. CERTIFICATIONS 19
A. Grantee Certificatioas 19
B. Certificadoa Regarding Dtug-Free Workplace 22
C. CertiSptioa Prohibiting Excessive Fcrce 25
D. CertiScation Regarding Lobbying 25
02928/0412/065
wldn\rpt\rp62
I~~
n
[ rcT ~e r[GUILS
Fieure No. ~escrin ion Papg
Floodplain Boundary Map 13
' ~ _I
APPLIGATICIN FUIi Lyn.II.IIINm .P..rrn,akwl~
FEDERAL ASSISTANCE
1. rrrt MtbaYNlpbl. Lyn gwvw.r n.n suu aPy,aml, I.rrMik
.POMrtNaI i na.PPNe.NNr
a
C
^
on
Knon ^ CGIwIK1b^
~. yn IKC4Y®W rtbiLL.a~KY
FMnY MInbIW
'~ Nprt(.MIIIKIM ~ ^ NYlrrarWUC11g1
L rrKKY1T N1I011W11011
c.YN Nrna pbaxolcw 41x1
ACCIW (P^'. city. cwnry It.M IM LP COd.): Wni. W WrpIWN ^MMN d tN. Pkkn bl b WNSYO m rMn.ll inph4q
ma riPltlnn fPM k.. reel
l .NrYrl.n IE.IIIIIIGINN NU11.A IUN] r. nNW YM1IUNi: N^M AOPloin.lr NIM rlr Eoa)
m ~ A !YY H MM.pkq.M 9cNN P6
B. COI/1h L &.4 C.na.YO beNUm d Ngnr L.kMp
a lYN ar.rrlNYTION G MrkyN J. PnNb U^IwwN
b. To.nWp n YWnTI~a.
u ...w u I:anw+w m u swan .. ;,CSiR~
i MN.rrirrop/ Y. ReL10rb.nblgl
. MWPn. .111.1 wW WIYb Mlklq N bN..F. ^ ^ Q IPd Oimid N. ObM I.WIA~
A .1vw.tW 4D.arw.rk. C.YVe OvNm
o Orn..r Ow.bn aaw (MNdhR LNrM brr®.yt.Plin
la uT~i a~rrm~urwi ob.Mme 11. awawm mu a.rRICJNll rlowcn
nn~
IL YIW .rMLT~O K rnLNbI.T WbrL caunHM MM .k.R
11. Il
SWI MN EMVq hY ...pp4aM : 0. rp.q
la ..1NY1N rykaNa le. a.iRq++IbN wlawcr ro iMM W' wF.n WNIM allm InH rLaeLm
.. F.OMn 1 .0/ a YI! TM/ WII.PPIICATNHl.1k1GT10N w.t Y.OE.V.a.~IF TO :11E
]r.TE 02afllVE OP061 tL/s.IIOCEp rq nNFW ON
a ....wn 1 .W o.n
.eau / //
b NQ Q PnaaMY mNOT Oa~161W Nfa 1]]r}
e ~.rr / m
~ oN rlloon.Y Nat rloT IEBI lREarE7 r ]r.iF ran IILVaw
. and a w
1. noyk..NON. 1 .m n. wMY.lkllf a/YMOVFIrbN.Ir/1MIK b.br1
^ rr n Yr• MYd1 .n bp.MM ^ No
/ Tara 1 .m
11 ro rNb btlr a w IIIMInLbb/ uq K W. LLL yu .1 r1.L.r.lIyTON.nYMIb.Tlgl.r/ inllt.Iw oo.nw+, to amwlrNU RM am
.vnlbl.se w rNt bbralnrlo Cobra TIn YRK.Nr kIbTM...rRJ1R IIIK eer.Lr Ilml Ts.rrcN~.bwnYnbn •rw.wltr.ne/ a.w.ab.e
. rrbp N.1b a.1Nnw11.b n.p..bbklr. a nb < rwywn rwnlblr
e /tnlw.d.llmawlbnl.l...Wa. . o.asrr
~3Q
tor'
v~r.~o a oln c,l~~ r :. ue
II -INTRODUCTION
The Final Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds {Final Statement) is
the primary document establishing the ways in which funds from the Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) program aze to ne used to support neighborhood
improvement activities throughout the City. 71tis document establishes a
comprehensive set of long-term goals and short-term strategies which will most
effeCively target these impsrtant resources to meet the cemmunity's needs.
Upon approval by the Ciry Council of the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga, City staff will
incorporate the Final Statement into the Cit}~s application for funding from the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) under the CDBG program
THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT "ROGRA_M
The CDBG program is funded by the federal government through HUD. The
program provides federal funds dmectly to cities and counties for a variety of housing,
community development and public service activities. The amount of funds which
may be received by each eligible city and county is determined by a mathematical
formula which measures the community's population, the age of the housing stock
and percentage of persons L+'ving in poverty.
Each city and county decides for itself how the money can best be used to meet the
-~: _: a., \ir:.M:.. .I.,. .:.i.l:.. ..1.I:n1.eA l... r1.. ..h
city and county evaluates its own needs, then designs and operates activities to meet
those needs.
The primary goals of the CDBG program are to improve the living conditions and
economic opportunities of lower income persons, to prevent and eliminate
community blight and blighting influences, and [o meet urgent needs for which no
other resources can be found. A minimum of 60 percent of the benefits of the
CDBG funded activities must be directed to activities which assist lower income
persons; either by providing benefits and services directly to lower income persons,
or by improving neighborhoods which are occupied primarily by lower income
persons.
Each year, communities wishing to receive CDBG funds must provide to the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development an application, along with an
evaluation of the community's needs, long-term goals, short-term objectives, and
proposed activities for the coming yeaz. The application also includes several
-2-
~-~
statements of polity regarding how CDBG funds will be used to minimize
displacement of residents, provide relocation benents where necessary, and evaluate
the need to receive additional community input prior to amending its proposed
activities. Finally, the application must also include a series of certifications by which
the community agrees to meet the requirements of federal law in carrying out its
CDBG funded activities.
COMMUNITY PARTICB'ATION IN THE CDBG A_pPLCATION PROCESS
In preparing the CDBG appligtion, each cotttmttnity is required to establish a
Citizens' Participation Plan that provides the public an opportunity to review and
comment upon the proposed uses of CDBG funds. The Citizens' Participation Plan
for the City of Rancho Otcamonga is ineiuded in this document
In accordance with the Citizens' Participation Plaq the CDBG progam staff solicited
ideas for projects to receive CDBG funding during the upcoming year. Letters were
sent to all community groups and agencies which have previously submitted
suggestions, as weB as to aB city departmeats. An advertisement was published in
the local paper iavititlg additional suggestions. The City Council approved the
Preliminary Statement on March 21, 1990 sad directed staff to prepare the Final
Statement.
A public hearing on the Final Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds
is a required part of the Citizens' Participation Plan. Notices of the public hearing
to be Geld on the Final Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds were
nnhlichad in ~hn Inoul nanny nn Anril 70 1000
-3-
~~
In order to integate the projects and activities undertaken through the Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) progam with other housing and community
development activities undertaken by the City and to coordinate long-term goals and
short-term objectives, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
adopts the following Community Development Plan:
THE GENERAt PLAN
The General Plan is the primary document establishing the goals and objectives of
the housing and community development projects and activities to be undertaken by
•~;, C;, • ~~ n.,..~n., f},ramontta. All projects and activides undertaken through the
~ -- ----
CDBG progam are to be in compliance with the General Plan. In additiov, to
selecting projects and activities to be undertaken through the CDBG progam, the
City will fast consider those projects which most directly serve to implement the
goals and objectives of the General Plan
"rtip. HOUSING a~':IS'rANCE PLAN
The Housing Assistance Platt, which is prepared each year for submission to the U.S.
Department of Hottsing and Urban Development (HUD), is the primary document
establishitg the gotils and objectives of the housing development, mortgage and
rental assistance, and residential rehabilitation activities to be undertaken by the City
compliance with We Housing~Element of the General Plan. - Lt developing the
Housing Assistance Plan, the City will fast consider those projects which most
directly serve to implement the goals and objectives of the Housing Element.
,OMM LAITY FDA t PMFNT 4 ENCY SPEC G PLANS
The Specific Plans adopted by the Cotitmutdty Redevelopment Agenry aze the
primary documents establishing the goals and objectives of the Community
Redevelopment Agency funded activities to prevent and eliminate blight and
blighting influences in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In selecting projects and
activities to be undertaken through the CDBG progam in lower-income and
Community Redevelopment Agency target azeas, the City will lust consider those
projc u ww'Ch mv,t "..irLC~y ~..~ t0 ~p:~m~.^.t the p'Oal,°. ~Cd tJbjtCtjyrc of [}t~
$peCIfIC Plans.
-4-
~~3
In order to establish long-term goals aad objectives for the Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) program, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby adopts the following Statement of Community Development Objectives:
roMMUVITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES
T~ - ~•~It.~ and ctahilix dnt?rinratino nniohhnrhnnda fn n._rvPnt artd
i. ~... -
eliminate blight and blighting influences, and to eliminate conditions
detrimental to the health, safety, and public welfaze.
2. To upgrade the City's subs[andazd rental and owner-occupied housing stock
tltrougn various forms ui irunuwu; :Wistance for residential rehabilitation.
3. To provide improvements to public azeas aad public facilities which make
them more useful and attractive, including developing and improving parks
and recreational facilides.
4. To fund public servioes which improve the quality of the living environment
and complement physical development activities being conducted is the City.
S. To fund public services which improve the quality of life for lower-income
persons, including senior eftiuns and handicapped persons.
6. To assist with the expansion of facilities and public services which improve the
quality of life for senior citizens.
7. To provide incentives for the preservation of historic properties through the
elimination of structural code deficiencies.
8. To provide information and affirmative support toward the goal of ensuring
that all residents have access to a decent home of their choice in a suitable
living environment.
9. To provide the administrative capacity to implement the City's CDBG
program, fair housing, and landlord/tenant mediation services and to
a..i.:ate the w h~~irt~ i mentarjnn of (-nn~ral Tian nd
coo: :esea:c., p..........,, aad imp.eW 1_---- a__
Housing Element revisions.
~d
-S-
SPECffIG COh"k~f!it~:; ;' D .Vy' Pb'~N"' N nC
In order to provide for the development of specific activities in support of the goals
and objectives described above, the City Council of the City of Rancho Ghcamonga
hereby identifies the following specific needs to be met through the CDBG program;
1. Financial assistance for owners of single-family residences occupied by lower-
income households to encourage housing rehabilitation is needed to improve
the quality of housing affordable to such persons, and to prevent the
deterioration of the housing stock which otherwise might result from a lack
of TCSOULCes [Or homing manicuaiaw a avic : o..., ^f ;;,^,' -' ^<=a
.......p `ma'r"'
by such households. The provision of such assistance also conMbutes to the
Cih~s general efforts to promote housing quality staadazds and eliminate
structural code deficiencies city-wide.
2, The provision of incentives for the rehabilitation of historic properties and the
elimination of strucnval deficiencies is needed to prevent and eliminate
blight, blighting influences, and condiri~as detrimental to public health and
safety.
3. The continuation of the City's ongoing efforts to design and conSWM street
improvements in the Southwest Cucamonga area is needed to improve the
living environments and prevent the deterioration of the iramportation
infrastructure in this older neighborhood.
4. The provision of counselling and refersal services to assist senior citizens in
locating shazed housing is needed to promote independence, and to increase
the availability of high•quality affordable housing choice fot senior citizens.
~-
/~5
V • PROiECt'FD USE OF FUNDS
A. NEI HBORHOOD PRECERVATION
1. Houin¢ Rehabdit~tion pro¢r~
Description: There ace three components to the Housing
Rehabilimtion Program:
a. The Low-Interest Loan Program will provide
amortised low-interest loans of up to $20,000 to
owners of single-family residences occupied by
lower-income persons, excluding mobile homes.
b. The Deferred Loan Program will provide non-
amortised loans of up to $15,000 to senior
citizens, households beaded by handicapped
persons and very-low income famihes who are
owner-occupants of single-famiy residences,
excluding mobIle homes. The loans will be due
and payable upon sale of the home.
c. The Home Rehabilitation Grant Program will
provide grants of up to 55,000 to lower-income
owner-occupants of single-family residences,
including mobile homes.
Location: All programs will be available city-wide.
Eligibility: This project is eligible under Section 570.202 of the
CDBG regulations.
Benefit: All loans and grants will be used for the rehabilitation
of residences occupied by lower-income households.
Project Funding: $80,000
2. H~rtoric Preservs ion mm~~+ves
Description: Historic Preservation grants and loans will be provided
to owners of historic properties for the elimination of
conditions detrimental to public health and safety as
defined by local codes and health ordinances.
.7.
~.~ ~
Location: The program will he offered city-wide.
Eligibility: This project is eligible under Section 570.202 of the
CDBG regulatio»s.
$enefit: All loans and grants will be used for the elimination of
condidoas detrimental to public health and safety, in
order to meet the eligibility criteria of preventing or
diaeradng spot bli~t.
Project Funding: 520,100
$. COUTHWEST CUCnMONGA 5 FET IMPROVEMENTS
Description: This project imoives the design and consvuction of streets,
curbs, gutters, and sidewalks for specific streets in the
Southwest Cucamottga neighborhood.
Location: The project will be undertaken at the following locations:
1. Construction of Improvemeau for Vinmar Avenue, north
of Salina Avenue and Salina Avenue, from Calaveras
Avenue to Sierra Madre Avenue.
2. Desiga of Improvements for Vinmar Avenue, from Nin[6
C,...~ ~n !`FnR.. Cb..~
3. Desigtt of Improvements for Sierra Madre Avenue, from
Ninth Street to Chaffee Street.
4. Construction of Improvements for Calaveras Avenue,
from Arrow Highway to Ninth Street.
Eligibility: This project is eligible under Section 570.201(c) of the CDBG
regulations.
Benefit: The sweets to be improved are located in an azea 51 percent or
more of whose residents are lower income.
Project Funding: 5240,000
-g-
~a ~
C. SENIOR SHARED HOUSING
Description: Tlils project is a continuation of a public service program to
provide a matching service for those who wish to share their
homes with senior citizens in need of housing as a means to
increase housing choices and promote independent living among
lower-inrnme senior citizens.
Lxation: This program will be available city-wide.
Eligibility: This project is eligible under Section 570.201(e) of the CDBG
regulations.
Benefit: The services will be provided to lower-income senior citizens.
Project Funding: 56,300
D.
Description: This program will provide for continuing the administration of
the CDBG program, including activities to coordinate the
implementation of the CDBG program with the City~s other
community development and planning activities, and support for
general planning and capacitybuiiding functions. This project
also includes the Fair Housing Program and the
r .,...~i....t m..,,.,. nrt.n:o«.... v.,.~.q..,
Location: This program will support CDBG eligible activities ciTy-wide.
Eligibility: This project is eligible under Section 570.205 and 970.206 of the
CDBG regulations.
Benefit: This program provides for benefits to the persons and
neighborhoods to be served by the above-0escrfbed programs.
Project Funding: CDHG Program Administration 577,805
General Planning S 6,000
Fair Housing Program 5 4,333
T andinrii~T!.^.ant ]vied!anOn C o dfil
Total 592,600
-9-
~8
E. CONTINGENCY
Description: Funds set aside for use at a later date either to continue
existing activities or to assist in the development of Pature
activities.
Location: To be determined at a later date.
Elitdbilitv: To be determined at a later date.
Benefit: To be determinetl at a later date.
Project Funding: 524,000
F. PRrIr;RAM INCOMI~A~ FROM P >:VIO R
Description: Funds received as a result of carrying out an activity funded
through the CDBG program, or CDBG funds provided to the
City in previous years which aze not currently allocated to any
activiri.
Project Funding: No such funds aze anticipated to be available during this
program year.
G, PPRrFNTAGE OF FUxDC WHICH BENEFIT LOWER LNCOME
This Projected Use of Funds allocates a minimum of g9 percent of the 1990.
91 CDBG allocation to activities which benefit lower-income persons.
N. TOTA i ~ PROdEC?'ED FUNDS ~44.~,Q94
-la
lag
Under federal Executive Order, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is required to protect
floodplains and to reduce the risk of losses from floods by not conducting, supporting,
or allowing activities to take place in floodplains unless the activities constitute the
only practical alternatives to meeting community needs.
Although most of the water courses in the City have been channeled to reduce flood
ti.~.+. ~1•r.r ~rP cmm~ arena whirh ara nntentially cnhiert to flnndin¢ in a 10(1-yeaz
flood, As indicated on the map attached as Figure 1, several of the proposed
activities are to be undertaken in floodplain areas at risk fora 100.yeaz flood. These
activities are designed to alleviate the deterioration of public and private property
already located in the floodplain. Therefore, these activities do not directly or
inriirertly amnort development within the floodplain.
Staff of the Planning Division of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has assessed the
long- and short-term risks of undertaking the activities within the floodplains, and has
assessed mitigation measures which may be included in the design of the activites.
Public notice of the intention to undertake activities within the floodplain was
pub:ished in the local newspaper to provide citiuat the opportunity to comment
upon the aNvitles. Notices were also provided to interested public agencies.
COIiTHWFCT CIICA_MONGA STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Staff considered in previous yeazs alternatives to providing public improvements in
areas of Southwest Cucamonga located in identified flood hazazd zones. All street
improvements proposed for funding through the 1990.91 Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) hive previously been reviewed and approved by the City
Council.
The Council has previously made a finding that the street improvement activities
which are proposed for the 1990-91 CDBG program are the most practical and
desirable alternatives, and that adequate mitigation meastres have been identified
and designed into the projects. The design, location, and size of the projects Gave
not changed subsequent to the Ending. Therefore, no new Ending is required.
HOU~II~; RR AA .TTA?'lO*I PROGRA+~4 ~itdD HIS'T'ORIC PRESERVATION
INCENTIVES
The Council has also made a previous fmding that the Housing Rehabilitation
Program and Historic Preservation Incentives Program are the most practical and
desirable alternatives, and that adequate mitigation measures have been identified
-11-
130
and designed into the projects. However, adding additional funding to these ongoing
programs requires a new fording.
Staff considered alternatives to undertaking these activities in the floodplain areas
and found them impractical and undesirable. One altemative would be to exclude
properties in these areas from the programs. This would leave residences in these
areas which are occupied by tower-inwme persons unprotected from the
de[erioration which may otherwise result from the deferred maintenance likely to
occur where financial assistance far home improvements is unavailable. 8xcluding
historic properties from the program would similarly fail to protect such properties.
The other alternative, removing the structures from the floodpiain, is clearly
imnrartical
in order to mitigate flood hazard impacts for swctures wltic6 are to be rehabilitated
under these programs, the ~ty may require that owners of properties located in
flood hazard areas show evidenty~ of federal fl.v.,i ;.._-•---- -.,.erage befc:c
rehabilitation assistance is provided.
FINDING
in order to approve operating the Housing Rehabilitation Program and Historic
Preservation Incentives Program within the floodplain the City Council finds that:
1. It is necessary to undertake the activities in the floodplain in order to protect
residences occupied by tower-income persons and historic properties from the
dnrnrinrarinn mhirh may nthenviae r'ailr from the dnferr~d maimenanr~ li4~ly
to occur where forancial assistance for repairs and improvements is
unavailable.
Adequate measures designed to mitigate the risk of property loss which may
result from underialdng the aciivities have been identified and included in the
operation of the activities.
The activities conform to applicable state and regional floodplain
management standards.
-12-
131
®~oo rue noon eouMOer
V ~
NORI'Fi
Cl~ ~' f1F_M~
jZA~[-~ ~'[JCA ~~, Flood ChannN
PLANNING DIVLSIpV 13~ FIGURE: ~ ScALE~ None
,-1 l.r
A, t't-t7EN ' P R IPATION PLAN
The City of Rancho Cucamonga encourages and solicits the participation of
its residents in the process of identifying projects for funding through the
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. The City will, in
conducting the CDBG Program; follow this Citizens' Participation Plan.
Outreach' The City of Rancho Cucamonga encourages citizen
pamctpation; with a particular emphasis on participation by persons of
low- and moderate-income and residents of neighborhoods which aze
experiencing physical deterioration. In order to reach as many
residents and community arouos as pacciblq letters will be sent to
community organizations and individuals who have participated in the
program or suggested projects in resat years. In addition, a display
advertisement will be published in the Daily Report at least a month
prior to consideration of the final statement.
2. LVotice. The City of Rancho Cucamonga provides atiuns with
advanced notice of all meetings related to the CDBG program and
makes copies of atl related materials available for public review as
soon as notice is given. Notice of the heating on the Preliminary
Statement of Community Development Objectives will be published in
II,n r1pnV RP..nn 9~ IPPOt to /IPVC Trll,T I/, tI1P hPPnnP
3. Technical Assistance. The City will publish the names and telephone
numbers of staff familiaz with the CDBG program who aze available
to answer questions and help residents and community groups package
a proposal.
4. Public Hearings. The City of Rancho Cucamonga uses public hearitgs
to obtain citizens' views and to respond to proposals and questions at
all stages of the program. A hearing is held on the Preliminary
Statement of Community Development Objectives at which the City+s
housing and community development needs are reviewed, past policies
and programs are discussed, and each proposed project is explained.
A final calertjnn of n}ijerriync and prno~amc is IhPa made And
published for public review and comment. The hearing on the final
grant application is held a month later. All hearings aze duly noticed.
Agendas and staff reporu are available in advance. The meetings are
held in the Don's Center, which is fully accessible to the handicapped.
t4-
133
5. Amendments to the Final Statement The City has established a
definition of "substantial change" for the purposes of amending the
Final Statement of Objectives. Any additioq daletioq cessation or
substantial change to any CDBG funded activity shall be considered by
the City Council at a regulazly scheduled meeting so as to provide the
public with an opportunity to comment upon the proposed change.
6, i an¢~,~oe Accessibility, Several neighborhoods have substantial
hispanic populations. At meetings where it is likely that the attendees
will not be bilingual, the City will provide an interpreter to ensure that
residents can understand and participate in the procedures.
7. Rgspon~iveness. Once projects have been funded and aze under way,
the City is committed to ensuring the satisfactory execution of each
nrpjeM. Staff prnvidwc a K...nl • to 'all tvTiitdtl tumplalllt5,
_ ...} espo..~..
usually within IS working days.
B. REL ATION Ac I T NC P ?N
Recent changes is the regulations governing the expenditure of CDBG funds
require that the City establish a policy governing the provision of relocation
assistance to any family, individual, business, non-profit organization or farm
that results from implementation of its CDBG programs. It is the polity of
the Ciry to avoid displacement of aB families, individuals, businesses, non-
profit organization and farms in canying out its CDBG programs.
No displacement is expected to result from the activities proposed for the
1990.91 program year. However, in the event that operation of any of the
CDBG funded activities results in the voluntary or involuntary displacement
of any family, individual, business, non-profit orgarzation or farm (whether
ow:ter o: renter) We City will provide relocation assistance in accordance with
the standards and guidelines set forth in the federal Uniform Relocation
Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act, Section 7260 (et seq.) of the
State of California Government Code (Title 25, Chapter 6) and the guidelines
issued by the State of California Department of Housing and Community
Development, as applicable. 'Ihe City will meet its relocation responsibilities
through the use of irs staff aad consultants, supplemented by assistance from
local realtors, social agencies, and avic organizations.
It is the City's objective that all displacees be relocated with a minimum of
hardship in accommodations which aze decent, safe, sanitary, and suitable to
their individual needs; located in areas not less desirable than their current
location in regard to public utilities and public and commercial facilities; and
-15-
13'~
reasonably accessible to their customers or places of employment and priced
within their 5nancial means.
The City will handle those cases requiring relocation which result from
implementation of CDBG activities on an individual case-by-case manner.
Services provided to eligible displacees shall include but not be limited to:
• Providing information on project activities, rights, benefits, and options
open to them.
• Maintaining liaison between displacees and agencies of firms with
resources to assist them (e.g., Chamber of Commerce, Small Business
Administration, Office of Local Economic Development, lending
institutions, realtors, etc.).
• Locating, inspecting, evaluating, or stimulating the production of
accommodations to meet the needs of all displacees.
• Assisting displacees in obtaining financing.
• Assisting displacees in securing priority consideration for rental
assistance, public housing, or other housing assistance activities.
• Making referrals to appropriate social, community, and welfare
agencies.
• Keeping records, maintaining files, and coordinating all relocation
activities.
• Providing all families, individuals, businesses, institutions, and fazms
which aze displaced by CDBG funded activities with written notice of
this policy, the types of services available to them, and the amount of
relocation assistance for which they maybe eligible, (Payments will be
in the amounts established by state and federal guidelines.)
City stall and consultants will be available to answer questions and provide
information, and, by their early involvement, to see that relocation proceeds
with a minimum of hardship.
C, RESIDENTIAL ANTI-DISPLACEMENT PLAN
Section 164 of the Housing and Corruntmity Development Act of 1974
requves each grantae to adopt, make public, and certify that it is following a
residentialanti-displacement plan providing one-for-one replacement units in
•16-
13,5
cases where residential units are demolished as a consequence of an activity
funded through the CDBG program. The plan must include steps that will be
[aken to rt+;n;m;~P the displacement of persons from thew homes resulting
from any activity funded under the CDBG program.
It is not anticipated that any demolition of residential stmcnues will occur as
a result of any of the activities proposed to be undertaken during the 1990-91
program yeaz. However, in accordance with the Act, the City of Rancho
Cucamonga establishes this Residential Anti-Displacement Plan.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will replace all occupied and vacant
occupiable lower-income dwelling units demolished or converted to a
use other than as lower-income housing as a direct result of activities
assisted with funds provided under the Housing and Community
^°~~-i..~.~.~t Act of 1974, as amended, as described in 7A CFR
570.606(b)(1).
2. All replacement housing will be provided within three years of the
commencement of the demolition or rehabilitation relating to
conversion.
3. Before obligating or expending funds that will directly result in such
demolition or conversion, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will make
public and submit to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development the following information in writing:
a. A description of [he proposed activity.
b. The general location on a map and the approximate m[mber of
dwelling units by number of bedrooms that will be demolished
or converted to a use other than as lower-income housing as a
duect result of the proposed activity.
c. A time schedule for the commencement and completion of the
demolition or conversion.
d. The general location on a map and approximate number of
dwelling units by number of bedrooms that will be provided as
rplaccment dwcllina units.
e. The source of funding and a time schedule for the provision of
replacement dwelling units.
•17-
13~
The basis for concluding t]tat each replacement dwelling unit
will remain alower-income dwelling unit for at least 10 years
from the date of initial occupancy.
D. CRITERIA FOR SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE
Federal regulations for the CDBG program require the City to notify affected
citizens and provide them the opportunity to comment on any proposed
aMiviTy which is added deleted, or stbstantially changed in terms of purpose.
scope, location, or beneficiaries following the submission of the Final
a[a[cu[oQ[ Vi l.VUUliwui •••• ~1.:..-.;,.-- , ~ a«_:--: ~d ~.~ ~(
J vfr~ ~~ ~~w ~ v~v .ti
Funds to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The
regulations require the City to adopt and make public its definition of
"substantial change." TLe City of Rancho Cucamonga shall consider a
"substantial change" to have occurred under the following t~rcumstances:
1. The amoun! to be allocated to any activity is proposed to be increased
or decreased from the amount in the Final Statement by more than 25
percent.
2. The location of the activity, or the target uea or eligibility criteria of
the program, is changed from that described in the Fiml Statement
3. An activity not included in the Final Statement is proposed for
funding.
4. An activity included in the Final Statement is proposed for elimination
or cessation.
Should the City Council consider a substantial. change in any CDBG funded
activity, the public will be provided an opporttnity to comment upon the
proposed change as provided in the Citizens' Participation Plan.
-18-
137
A. GRANTEE CERTIFICATIONS
In acrnrdance with the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974,
as amended, and with 24 CFR 570.303 of the Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) regulations, the City of Rancho Cucamonga certifies that:
It possesses legal authority to make a grant submission and to execute
a communiri develooment and housing program.
The City Council has duly adopted a resolution authorizing the Mayor
to submit the final statement and amendments thereto, and all
understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing and
aL`i1•QrjyiIlVO the Mavnr tC o~ i_ ..V~h~'n~ .u:rw ~I.e S1bm:S`s:Gu iti we
v°
final statement and to provide such additional information at may be
required.
3. Prior to submission of its final statement to HUD, it has:
Met the citizen participation requirements of ?F570.301(b).
b. Prepared its fatal statement of community development
objectives and projected use of funds in accordance with
857(17l11lrl and made the final statement available to the
public.
[t is following a detailed citizen participation plan which:
a. Provides for and encourages titian participation, with
particular emphasis on participation by persons of low- and
moderate-income who are residents of slum and blighted areas
and of areas in which funds aze proposed to be used and
provides for participation of residents in tow- and moderate-
income neighborhoods as defined by the City.
b. Provides citizens with reasonable and timely access to local
meetings; information; and reccirds relating in the grantee's
proposed use of funds, as required by the regulations of the
Secretary of HUD, and relating to the actual use of funds under
the Act.
-19-
13$
c. Provides for technical assistance to groups representative of
persons of low- and moderate-income that rzquest such
assistance in developing proposals with the level and type of
assistance to be determined by the grantee.
d. Provides for public bearings to obtain atizen views and to
respond to proposals and questions at all stages of the
community development program, including at least [he
development of needs, the review of proposed activities, and
review of program performance, which hearinq^ shall be head
_r's: °..~yunto ounce, at times and locations convenient to
potential or aMUal beneficiaries, and with accommodation for
the handicapped.
_, Prn.dd~; Fn. n ~~ev L~^C.eII one. rn .urinnn nmm~lainte anA
grievances, within 15 working days where practicable.
f. Identifies how the needs of non-English speaking residents will
be met in the case of public hearings where a significant
number of non-English spealang residents can be reasonably
expelled to participate.
S. The grant will be conducted and administered in compliance with:
a. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88.352, 42
r r c r aorwu .. ~.n i
b. The Fau Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601-20).
6. It will affirmatively further fair housing.
7. It has developed its final statement of projected use of funds so as to
givc maximum feasible priority to activities wldch benefit low• and
moderate- income families or aid in the prevention or elimination of
slums or blight; (the fittal staument of projected use of funds may also
include activities which the grantee certifies are designed to meet other
cotntnunity development needs having a particular urgency because
existittg conditions pose a carious and hnmediau ducat to the health
nr wn~1n_ pf rhn rnmrr qty any}' nt~itr na dal rr.rn~rcnt ark nnr
available); except that the aggregate use of CDBG [ands received
under section 106 of the Act, and if applicable, under action 108 of
the Act, during the 1990.91 through 1992-93 program years, shall
principally benefit persons of low- and moderataincome in a manner
•za
139
that ensures that not less than 60 percent of such funds aze used for
activities that benefit such persons during such period.
8. It has developed a community development plaq for the period
specified in pazagraph 7 above, that identifies community development
and housittg seeds and specifies boW short- and long-term community
development objectives that have been developed in accordance with
the primary objective and requirements of the Act.
9. It is following a current housing assistance plan which has been
appmvcu vy nv L.
10. It will not attempt to recover any capital msts of public improvements
assisted in whole or in part with ftmds provided under Section 106 of
it miaranM~ rind r
'wc Act - 't.i atnc .,.;,:lnn; _om a e_ Sestinn if1R
p_____
of the Act~by assessittg`any amount against properties owned and
occupied by persons of low- and moderate-income, including any fee
chazged or assessments made as a condition of obtaining access to such
public improvements, unless:
a. funds received under Section 106 of the AM aze used to pay the
proportion of such fee or assessment that relates to the capital
costs of such public improvements that are financed from
revenue sources other than under Title I of the Act; or
h. for tmrnoses of assessin¢ am amount against nrooerties owned
and occupied by persons of moderate inrnme, the grantee
certifies to the Secretary that it lacks sufficient funds received
under Section 106 of the Act to comply with the requirements
of subpazagraph (a) above.
11. Its notification, inspection, testing, and abatement procedures
concerning lead-based paint will comply with §570.608.
12. It will comply with the acquisition and relocation requirements of the
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies
Act of 1970 as required under §570.606(a) and federal implementing
regulations; the requirements in §570.606(b) governing residential anti-
disnlacement sad reio~tion assistance elan under SECGOn 104td) of
the Act (including a certification that the grantee is following such a
plan); the relocation requirements of §570.606(c) governing
displacement subject to section 104(k) of the Act; and the relocation
-21•
J~~
requirements of §570.G06(d) governing optional relocation assistance
under Section 105(x)(11) of the AcK.
13. It will comply witit the other provisions of the Act and with other
applicable laws.
B. CERTTFfCATION RE R IN A DR - F WO tcv ar
The Ciry of Rancho Cltcamonga certifies that it will provide a dm¢-free
workplace by:
1. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful
manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a rnntrolled
substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and soecifyinv rhp
..::acs tha: w:l; be ixicen against employees for violation of such
prohibition.
2. Establishing adrug-free awareness program to inform employees
about:
a. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace.
b. The City's polity of maintaining adrug-free workplace.
c. Any available drug counselling, rehabilitation, and employee
assistance oro~ams.
d. The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug
abuse violations occurring in the workplace.
3. Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the
performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by
paragraph 1.
4. Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph 1 that,
as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will:
a Abide by the terms of the statement; and
b. Notify the employer of any criminal drug statute comictian for
a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five days
after such wmiction.
-~-
~~~
Notifying the U.S. Department of mousing and Urban Development
within ten days after receiving notice under subparagraph (4)(b) from
an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction
Taking one of the following actions, within 30 days of receiving notice
under subparagraph (4)(b), with respect to a~ employee who is so
convicted:
a. Talrlna nn_n_mnrinm vn•n~nnl nnj..n n n:n~~ 0....6 n n.ei...,eu
_ _b.._..... a
up to and including termination.
b. Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug
abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such
purposes by a federal, s'.ate, or local hearth, law enforcement,
or other appropriate agency.
7. Mating a good faith effort to continue to maintain adrug-free
workplace through impkmenuttion of paragraphs Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and
6.
-23-
I Ala
PLACE OF PERFORMANCE
FOR CERTIFICAITON REGARDWG
DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE REQUIItEMENT3
Name of Grantee: TLe City of Rancho Cucamottga, California
chant Program Name: Community Uevetopment Block Grant Program
Grant Number: B-90-MC-06-0556
Date: May 2, 1990
Place of Performance:
Rancho Cucamonga City Hall
9320 Base Line Road
and
10500 Civic Center Drive
Ranrhn llv~,.o..nou robs ...:n o1"19n
•24
1~3
C.
In accordance with Section 519 of Public Law 101-140, the 1990 HUD
Appropriations Act, The City of Rancho Cucamonga certifies that it has
adopted and is enforcing a polity prohibiting the use of excessive force bylaw
enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged
in nonviolent civil rights demonstrations.
D. CERTIFICATION REGARDING LgB~-Y~N~r
The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
1. No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on
behalf of the u:.do ~ie:.cd, ::, :.:; rc:a~~ fnr': ~ac= =gig ar atte~nring
to influence an omcer or employee of any agency, a ivic:xtucr ~f
Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a
Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal
contract, the making of amp cooperative agreement, and the extension,
continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal
contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
2. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or
will be paid to a~ person for influencing or attempting to influence an
officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer
or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in
rnnnrrrlnn w;th th;c federal ronKaM. vrant Inan. nr cnot>erative
agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standazd Form-
LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance: with its
inStmCtmnS.
3. The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be
included in the award documents for all subawazds at all tiers
(including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans,
and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and
disclose accordingly.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was
placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this
rrtii_fiCBtitm ig a prere,~i,i~ile fi,F making i,r 2nterin¢ ir~t0 ibis h-aii5aCti0iL
imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U. S. Code. Any person who fails to file
the regttired certification shall be subjeM to a ~tivil penalty of not less than
510,000 and not more than 5100,(100 for each such failure.
Signed:
Dennis I. Stout, Mayor
I ~~
-25-
RESOLUTION N0. 9O ' ~ v
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FINAL STATEMENT OF
COMMUNITY OEV ELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF
FUNDS FOR THE COhfriUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
FOR PROGRAM YEAR 1990-91
WN FR FAC, tho Pity of Rancho Cucamonga is an Entitlement Citv under
the regulations governing the Community Development Block Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, notice of the availability of funds for eligible projects
was published in The Daily Report and mailed to interested comnun ity groups;
and
WHEREAS, the City staff has received proposals for projects and
programs from various organizations in the community; and
WHEREAS, on March 21, 1990, the City Council heard public testimony
and received all public input regarding the City's Community Development Biock
Grant Program for the 1990-91 fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the potential environmental
impacts of each project, and has reviewed all possible alternatives and
mitigation measures included in each.
NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
~~~~~~~ ~_.+~~.~ o~~~ Lo ee Lim iuiiuwiny ac~imu:
1. Adopt the Final Statement of Conunity Development Objectives
and Projected Use of Funds (final Statement) for program year
1990-91 and make all findings, determinations, and
certifications and adopt all policies therein;
2. Select the fo 7lowing projects and programs to be funded out of
the City's 1990-91 Community Development Block Grant award:
Pro.iect/Program Amount
a. Housing Rehabilitation E 80,000
b. Historic Preservation Incentives 20,100
c. Southwest Cucamonga Street Improvements 240.000
d. S^,. Shred Hcu -
6,-s"u0
e. Program Administration, General Planning
and Fair Housing Pr gram 92,600
f• 9e+ieY fTrn~ri) PPosRun 24.000
TOTAL 1990-91 CDBG Projects/Programs E463,000
3. De termfne that the proposed projec is are the most
environmentally desirable and that adequate mitigation has been
included in each to avoid significant environmental impacts
under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA);
~~s
CITY LOUNCIL RESOLUTION N0.
FINAL STATEMENT FOR CDRG FUNDS 90-91
May 2, 1990
Page 2
De to rmine that ali of the proposed projects are exempt for
environmental review under the California Environmental Quality
Act (Section 1530I of Lhe CEQA Guidelines); and
..a.u t.".o rite :he Mayer sigr, t`e application fur the City's program
year 1990-91 Commu pity Dnvetn nmont agcy rr,-t ,,,- „~,,;,
allocation, to submit the Final Statement and amendments
thereto, and all understandings and assurances contained
therein, and to act in connection with the submission of the
Final Statement and to provide such additional information as
did~'ve required.
/ ~~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
~.
._
DATE: May 2, 1990
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
copM• k.an nn itnr: rity Ptannor ~
BY: Alan Warren, Associate Plan nor
SUBJECT: STREET NAME CHANGE 90-Ot - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal
to change the name of Rochester Avenue old portionl from 4th
.:. yv .... dyy~ 1' f,^ •• +!6 of 6th Ch. n1
distance of approximately A/10 of Ya ~mile.J Planning Commission
recommended name change to Charles Smith Avenue. Proposal to
also change the name of that portion of Rochester Avenue (new
portion) south of 6th Street. Planning Commission recommended
name change to Rochester Court. Alternative street names may be
considered by the City Council.
RECOMMENGATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Lounci
°utho rite the renaming cf the cld portion of Roch e; ter Avenue, between 4th
Street and its "T" intersection with the new portion of 7Roc hester Avenue, to
Charles Smith Avenue. The Planning Commission also recommends that the new
oo rtion of Rochester Avenue south of 5th Street ho rhanned rn Rnr hnctnr rn~~rr
BACKGROUND: In February of this year, a businessman, soon to move into the
industrial area, requested the Planning Commission to consider the renaming of
the portions of Rochester Avenue near fith Street. The Planning Commission
concurred with the businessman's and staff's concerns regarding the double
intersections of Rochester Avenue and 6Gh Street and directed staff to
initiate the format process to correct *.he problem.
On April 11, 1990, the Planning Commission determined that the old portion of
Rochester Avenue from 4th Street to its "T" intersection with the new portion
of Rochester Avenue should be renamed Charles Smith Avenue and the new oortion
of Rochester Avenue south of 6th Street should be named Rochester Court.
DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS: The issues analyzed in the renaming process included
setectio^. ofnamT? appropriate for u ir, the General area, and develcoment
of a street naming plan which took into cans ideration the ultimate planned
roadway configurations in the ironed is to area. Significant issues considered
by the Planning Commission in making its recommendations included the
following:
A. The double Rochester intersections !old and new portions) with 6th
Street is a potentially confusing and unacceptable sf tuatfon wh tch
needs correc Liao.
~~ I
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
STREET NAME CHANGE 90-0~
May 2, 1990
Fage 2
D, Because of the old portion of Rochester Avenue just north of 6th
Street is to be replaced by a freeway ramp and the Rochester Avenve
intersection at 4th Street i5 planned to be abandoned, it was
determined that the name change would be most appropriate between
these points. This name change Dlan conforms to the City Code
pruv is ions for street naming and the plan has been reviewed by the
Fi .^P nic Yrirt anA 1hP Sh Priff'S DP na r}mnn}
C. Accepting the suggestion by the Historical Preservation Commission
rHPCI to rename the street after persons significant in the early
development of the area, Charles Smith Avenue was selected due to his
Significant activities in the early develooment of the community of
Hocnester. The Fire District has commented that first and last name
combinations should generally be avoided, but that Charles Smith
Rve nue should be "okay." The Sheriff's Department did not object to
the proposed change.
Other names suggested by the HPC which the City Council may wish to
consider include "Amiee", "Di Carlo", "Lopez", "Masi" and "Van
Fleet" from families which were involved in the area's develooment in
the late ]800's/early 1900's.
For further detailed analysis of the issue, please refer to the attached
Planning Commission Staff Reports and Minutes.
tNV1HUNMtNIAI gNALYSIS: Apart from the minor impacts listed in the Planning
Commission Staff Report of March 28, ]990, 5ta ff does not see any possibility
that the street naming plan may have a significant effect on the environment
and therefore this activity is not subject to the California Environmental
Quality Act, per Section 150fi1(b)(B). if the name change is approved, a
Notice of Exemption shall he filed for the project as required by CEQA Section
15061(di,
FINDINGS: Based on the information contained in this report and staff
analysis of the proposal, it is recommended that the following findings he
made in regards to this action:
A. That the proposed change is consistent with the goals, policies, and
standards of the General Plan;
B. That the proposed change is consistent with the circulation element
of the General Pian;
C. That the proposed change will not cause significant adverse impacts
upon the environment;
D. Tha! th; proposed change is deemed necessary to protect the public
health, ',e fety, comfort, convenience, and general welfare by
correcting the double Rochester Avenue Intersection at 6th Street.
'~~
CITY COONCIL STAFF REPORT
STREET NAME CHANGE 90-01
May 2, 1990
Page 3
CORRES PONOENCE: This item has been noticed in The Daily Report newspaper,
posted at designated areas along Rochester Avenue, and written notices were
sent to property owners, and residents/businesses who faced onto or abutted
Rochester Avenue.
ar7tnu.: rf the City Council - -curs pith the findings end recommendations of
the Planning Commission, it would he aporoor is to to authorize the name char.pe
of Rochester Avenue as ou Ylined by the adoption of the attached Resolution of
Approval.
R ye ull it~~
` Brad B e
City goner
BB;AW/j fs
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Area Map of Recommended Plan
Exhibit "B" - Resolution No. 90-44
Exhibit "C" - Planning Commissivn Minutes of April, 11. 1990
Exhibit "D" - Planning Commission Staff Report April 11, 1990
Exhibit "E" - Planning Commission Minutes of March 28, 1990
Exii iui~ "F" - "r iann mg commission Sta it Keport March 28, 1990
Exhibit "G" - Resolut ton No. 90-23
Exhibit "H" - Planning Commiss TOr. Minutes of February 14, 1990
Exhibit "I" - Planning Commission Staff Report of February 14,
1990
City Cou rcil Resolution of Approval
~~9
~ ~ _ ,, ~ ~_
`, y3f4Ji'~pM h
%~1, ~' q.y ~%
~ MARINO
O
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING DMSION ~ 5~
rv ~
I~BINOM~fO
ro o~
t5 wwtE
L.~
r
Sr
ITEM: kbc1K57ER qUE NR1+IE ~NAN~fi
7TiLE:f~mh+MePED GGAN MtkA MAP 7V
EXHIBIT: A SCALE: -
RESOLUTION N0. g0-44
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF iNE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCANONGA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE
APPROVAL OF STREET NAME CHANGE N0. 90-01 TU CHANGE THE
NAME OF TWO PORTIONS OF ROCHESTER AVENUE TO CHARLES SMITH
AVENUE AND ROCHESTER LOURT RESPECTIVELY, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
A. Recitals.
!+) n.; pph.gary 1a, loon: rho P7q nn inn fommic<inn of the City of
Ra ntho Cucamonga reviewed a written request by Mr. Irving V. Augur to rename a
portion of Rochester Avenue in the area of its intersections with 6th
Street. On that date, the Planning Commission, by its adoption of Resolution
No. 90-23, declared its intention to initiate the process to rename portions
of Rochester Avenue immediately north and south of 6th Street.
(ii) On March 28, 1990, and continued to April I1, 199C, the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed
public hearing for the above-mentioned street rename proposal, Street Name
Change No. 90-01, pursuant to the City Code Lha pter 12.12.
(iii) The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division Drepared a report which
addressed the justification for the change, recommended a street namf ng plan,
provided alternate replacement names, aM discussed the fmpac is of the
recommended change.
,:
.) ~~~ ieyai Pre, eyuiaiies w cne aaopiton of to 15 Resolution
have ocw rred.
Resolution.
NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined arld resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rant hq Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the farts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on March 28, 1990, and continued to
April 11, 1990, including written and ora'. staff reports, this Commission
hereby specifically finds as fgllews:
a. The current Rochester Avenue street naming situation which
results in two (2) Rochester Avenue intersections at 6th Street 1s potentially
confusing to the general public and emergency personnel and it should be
corrected.
/~ /
Exh ~ lift' B
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 90-44
STREET NAME CHANGE 90-01
April 11, 1990
Page 2
D. The proposed name "Charles Smith Avenue" has historical
significance to the general area, where Charles N. Smith helped develop
commercial activities near Rochester and 8th Streets in the late 1800's,
c. The street name change, "Charles Smith Avenue," applies to
approx i..a tzly 8/10 of a mile of Rochester Avenue between the southern Rancho
Cucamonga City limits and its inte rsec ttonlterminus with the new portion of
Rochester Avenue,
a. ine street name change, "Rochester Court," applies to that
portion of Rochester Avenue that is approximately 820 feet west of the I-15
Ere eway from its terminus 600 feet south of 6th Street to its intersection
with 6th Street.
e. This proposed street name change would not be materially
injurious or detrimental to the properties adjacent to Rochester Avenue and
would not have a significant impact on the environment nor surrounding
properties.
f. That this street name change proposal is in conformance
with the provisions of Che City's Street Naming provisions, City Cade Chapter
12.12,
3. Based upon the substant sal evidence presented to this Commission
during the public hearing and upon the Soecf fic fi ndinax of farr< ear s,.. s,,
paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as
follows:
a. That the proposed name change is consistent with the goals,
policies and standards of the General Plan.
b. That the proposed Change is consistent with the Circulation
Element of the General Plan.
c. That the proposed change will not cause significant adverse
impact upon the environment.
d. The proposed change is deemed necessary to protect the
public health, safety, comfort, convenience, and general welfare by providing
only one (1) Roc ho star Avenue interiee Eton at 6th Stre.r,
4, Thts Commission hereby fiM s that the project has been reviewed
and considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) of 1910 and determines this action to be exempt from further
environmental review, as provided in LEQA Sect ton 15061 (B)(3).
Asa
$-2.
PLANNING GOMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 90-44
STREET NAME CHANGE 90-01
April ll, 1990
Page 3
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
I, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends to the Lity Council
the approval on the I1 th day of April, 1990 of Street Name Change No. 90-O1.
6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the
adoption o. phi; Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THiS 11TH DAY OF APRIL, 1990.
PLANNING COMH ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
GY
rma
I, Drad gul ler, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Comm1551 on of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
gn the 11th day of April, 1990, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, MCNIEL, NEINBERGER
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA. TOLSTOY
1~3
'13 - 3
aaop7~
. . t :
CONSENT CALENDAR
A. VARIANCE 90-01 - VE ial of a req low the construction of a
house to enc ro the required interior d setback by 5 feet
for a singe residence located in the Low Re District (2-4
dmellin per acre) at 98 i7 Feron Bouieva rd - APM:
~~ .~i~~•~Laca. ,~+~+ uy o,a xes,ey, unam meU5ly Carr1}.~0
r r • , ~
a~!BLIC HEARINGS
G. STREET NAME CHANGE 90-O1 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to change
name o oc hester venue o d port on rom th Street to a pof nt
approximately 600 feet north of 6th Street, a distance of approxfmately
8/10 of a mile. Suggested name change to Smith Bros. Avenue. Proposal to
also change name of that portion of Rochester Avenue (new portion) south
of 6th Street. Suggested name change to Rochester Court. Alternative
street names may be considered by the Planning Conwission. (Continued
from March 2B, 1990.)
Alan warren, Associate Planner, presented the staff report.
~nairman Mcniel opened the public hearing; but Aearfng no further testimony,
he closed the public hearing.
Chairman McNiel stated that the Cf ty likes to apply historical names to parks
or streets but the opportunity does not frequently arise. He felt Smith Bros.
Avenue sounds too moth 1!ke cough drops. He it ked the name Charles Smith
Avenue, but wondered if the double name could cause problems for emergency
services. Ne supported Smith Family Rvenue.
Commissioner Blakesley agreed that Smith Avenue sounds too generic. He felt
that the name Smith Bros. Avenue requires a knowledge of local history to
appreciate the meaning. He supported Charles Smith Avenue.
Commissioner Ikinberger did not like Smith Famfly Avenue. She supported
either Sm?Lh Bros. Avenue or Charles Smith Avenue.
Lommissioner Blakesley stated that Charles Smith was the pr}ncfpal Smith
brother and he was very important to the specific location.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated he would verify that Lhe Firc District and
Sheriff's Department support the name Charles Smith Avenue before forwarding
it to City Council.
Planning Commissfon Minutes -2- April tl, 1990
I~~
Exh;b'~t C
Motion: Moved 6y Bla ke sley, seta nd ed by McNiel, to adopt the Resolution
recommending Street Name Change 90-01 with modification to change names to
Charles Smith Avenue and Rochester Court. Motion carried by the following
vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKE SLE Y, MCNIEL, WEINB ERGER
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CMITI EA, TOLSTOY -carried
R M f i i
- n ~uuuiv~
1 ndu strial District (Subarea 11), located on the northwest co
of treet and Buffalo Avenue - APN: 229-252-29. (Continued om
Ma rrh 90.)
Chairman McNiel d that the applicant had requested the item be tinned
to April 25, 1990. pened the public hearing.
There were no public co
Motion: Moved by Weinberger, nde
Assessment and Tentative Pa rte
by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLE
.:"v CS. euririiSSiirnEna: nunt
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CNITIEA,
r t ~ • +
d by glakesley, to
12338 to April 25,
-carried
Environmental
Motion carried
D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO ATIVE TRACT 132 - LEWIS MOVES - A
resi entia subs v s on an gn rev ew of 1 con um un is on 4.36
acres of la M in the Med esidential District (8-14 llfng units per
acre) of the Terra Y Planned Community, located the southwest
corner of Mountain V rive arxl Milliken Avenue - APN: -091-36.
Dan Coleman, Princi anner, presented the statf report.
Chairman McNfe ned the publit hearinq.
George Ch is Nomes, D. 0. gax 670, Upland, salted he was avails to
answer tons.
Planning Commission Minutes -3-
~~
April 11, 1990
C-Z
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAi~IONGA
STAFF REPORT
GATE: April 11, 1990
TO: Chairman and Memhers of the Planning Commission
FRDM• Rr~A Rnn nr r: ~.. oi__'_,.
BY: Alan Na rren, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: STREET NAME CHANGE 90-01 - CITY OF RANCHO _C_UCAMONGA - A
proposal to change name of Rochester Avenue (old portion)
f.,.m eth St n..et r~ pn;nt app _ ,tet,. 5nn sn et rih ns
6th Street, ~a distance of approximately 8/IO~of na mile.
Suggested name change to Smith Avenue. Proposal to also
change name of that portion of Rochester Avenue fnew
portions south of 5th Street. Suggested name change to
Rochester Court. Alternative street names may be
considered by the Planning Commission.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: At the March 28, 1990, meeting the
Planning Commission favored the proposed street renaming plan but
was generally unsatisfied with the use of the name "Smith". The
~n
- '-' "'-- '" "' ,t,.. ~~ ~~ a ii~iie more resea rcn on the
SmithJBro thers ~to ~d ete rmine if the street name could be enhanced
to give it more local identification.
Attached is a copy of the Daily Report article "Rochester: A town
that faded away", September 21, 1980, which outlines the rather
significant history the Smith Brothers, Cha rtes 6. and Rudolph
Smith, played in the development of the Rochester community.
With this information, the Planning Commission may wish to
consider the followf ng names to identify the renamed street:
Charles Smith Avenue
Charles W. Smith Avenue
Rudolph Smith Avenue
\mi1F e~n~ ~..--..-
Smith Family~Avenue
Amiee Avenue
Di Carlo Avenue
Lopez Avenue
Ma 51 AYenpe
Van Fleet Avenue
The street name should be relatively easy to pronounce and not
produce confusion with any other street names. Staff recommends
"Smith Bros. Avenue".
II. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission
choose a name far use on the portion of Aochester Avenue from 4th
Street to the new Rochester Avenue roadway for inclusion into the
attached Resolution. , _
Ex hlb~t' D
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
STREET NAME CHANGE 90-01
April 11, 1990
Page 2
Respectful y s~u bum ityed,
~~`v°~ ~~
nrae nutter /
City Planner
BB:AW:js
At taC hmen ts: Exhibit "A" - Daily Rennrt Arl irla; Sanromhar 91, inRO
Exhibit "B" - Area Map of Recommended Plan
Resolution of Approval
157
'~. 2
Pegee fznn the Pant
BEDFORD CONLEY
Ro<Aeeter Avenue k all Shat b tell to raniM us d Ne
loan Mtween Etiwanda aM ftorN Cuumonp. Begin
ning b is», alter Ne Doom period, Il nruggled bard for
eztsten<e.
CDarlesw Smith. the founder, made hit Brst purMau
n! land an JuIY 28. IB11, aril eonliwM buYlnt Drlvate
IanCS aM railroad property Ntd he Nd about i,000
acres. Ne came Rnm Ra.'hefter. Penn., mar Pltteburgh,
probably for~hls hea1N, aM settled b Cunmmga.
He IollowM Ne plant d Ne promatns d Cueamrxlga
enA nne.rin by bvins al Orame Avm», a tree-Ilned
double boulevard Nree MI» lang. TM Ind was dtvtdld
into lenacre bts, and Ne deeds carried a temperarce
clause.
Water was bmught to etch Id by concrlN pipe TM
stuck d the Rochnter Rater Company was wDxrihM
before the land wort an »k by SmI1D and At woe,
brother. Ella Colton and Berth CdtM.
The lard was Ilrsl dlered at 1106115 sw xn b
iebruary 1889, for thou who wwM (wild a house aM
}tart planting. EmuRA IoM w» add Na fire! year n
Ihal a past ot0ee was n1aDlifhM. and • alon, lumber
yard, teleDAMe, and MlN were put up. TM SeuNern
Paulic put In a switch aM a nag atop. TM xhml
building was complNM In Ura aprfng d IMI.
Belore April 1. Int. Rmlth Dad bw{At 720 xra 10.000
feel away In a canyN. TM wars rote to Ne wrtatt Md
then larther dean wort underground, nil to reappear M
hit Iona. Ne conatncted !Noels, dlteDM, /bore, and
dams. and put In pip» at a cost d tf0,000. Nben tM
water wet turned m N. neat summa, there w» a 176
mch now.
Immedialdy, tM Etiwanda Co. Drought suit agalmt
the Rochnter Co , cblming II rMxad lMlf warn aupp-
IY The case ass In the courts for two Teen.
More Than 770 acre nNgether Md MM hnproved b)'
1»7. and the Rocnetter Fruit Co. Dulls a packing houu.
Before Ne trouble about tM water began, Rudolph
Emith, a brother, relurnM W Penmylvanla to spend
several months "hunting" mbnMra. He retlwllld m Oc-
tobcr In2, aith a party of roarly IW people aM lhetr
Irelght. ADoul the ume time CMrI» also brfwght Mck
more utllera. for whom a big welcoming parry w» hdd
in the packing houu..
Ezperta Md Men Drought N loatudy the watts wore
In Inc null d tM EtlwanN G. and, Mted aw thNr fin.
dingt, the court lound petits! the. Rochester Water fn.
on Feb. 11. 1901. RorhenM was Mit wrlb only wells.
The Bmith! had spent /rlelY In providing water, pbn-
llnp aM general Improvemema » Wrl their two.
Thry must have Stan Iv orr iaady caaD, for aermai
aulta, orally under 1100, wen bought apt»t them Inr
rot lurnirq orv monks tolladd br'IM Rat'Mner
Fruit Co. AI om lime. BerlDa and EIA Cotton Nd la
guarantee {100 court lees ao fhe&nYlp emW apprai the
JWgrnm4.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING DMSION
158
y wptelbe]'.I~ f •~98D' T.
Rochester:. A town that faded:away.~
By BERNICE
In spite of the Smnhe' Nf brullt», in tltO7lM trail was " '
}till ultling up. The stwrkeeper w» ddng • nn0
buslmst and the attMdantt at Ibe xhod w» the tartest
rvcr mrollM.
Grapn were the main prMu'Ct aM It w» »i0 Nero '
.w» plenty d a~atrr Inr poutaa aril alhlA. ~• 6
TM yaan IADA-99 brnuRM little rain/all aM the
Rochester company, as with lM Sn Anlmin and ~~
Curamm¢a crompanin. cnuW nil wpoly tM'neMs
Crnpf IaiIM and tM exndu} MRan. Aioa of IM land amt
to non-r»IdMI owmrs wM hired foreign latwrm to
work In the rfnesardt. 'M '+
f. , ,... n. q,v }vmv <anpany. o,n rn
Ia~C! N'a}Nine }N'!d m fill - iIMIDH tM} l0 rYTrfTII. ~'
By loll fn moor Md mm'M aaay that Nep»I dfln aa} '
closM aril mad ad} adrrsud to Nnrtq Curamnnpa. '
Even the Rachexter R'atrr Co. movM its Madyu~rten to
Lot AnRrln. a
In 102] IM Rnr'M}err .frhrdl a'» lord and lM~puptb ;
IrdnllMfed D,Y bU} In a t'afamlalga KMMII. EYM lh¢nid
hrtl N'as takm aimrg. Bwldtngt deterhrated until tAryr ',
AisanprorM. Thu old Inwn at EIBMA lnrcel arA "
Roch»tm Avmw 4 ro more. „ . _...
ITEM: 37RElT NM11E c11M1LE 9o•W
'iT[1.E DAILY RlEiphRr SEPI. 21~ r80 N
El(HtBIT: A SGLE:
U-s
~:~-~z
~~9, `:
~,.4J MAR~MO
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANMNG DNiSION I SG~
ro ~
A61NOwfp
bMIM)
roNURiWC ,
tb gIM4A::
KwMlE:i ii';:a;..
'ITI'LE(~m~'MlDED aAN NPr11
E7(HIBTT: 8 SGLE: -
~_
i
N
E. STREET NAME CHANGE 90-01 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOMGA - A proposal to change
name of Rochester Avenue old portion from 4th Street to a point
approzima to ly 500 feet north of 6th Street, a distance of approzima to ly
8/10 of a mile. Suggested name change to Smith Avenue. Proposal to also
change name of that portion of Rochester Avenue (new portion) south of 6th
Street. Suggested name Change to Rochester Court. Alternative street
names may be considered by the Planning Commission.
Alan Warren, Associate Planner, presented the staff report.
Cnmm'ssioner 91y4nstny asked for clarification of the plat ement of the
nrn nn<cA f~
- . __ ... ~. inv.
Shintu Bose, Oepu ty City Engineer, indicated the placement.
Commissioner Blakesley asked if the name Smith Brothers Avenue had been
considered. He felt Smith Avenue sounds too a_ene rir.
Mr. Warren responded that one aspect of the street naming polity is to keep
names as simple as possible. He did not feel Smith Brothers Avenue would be a
problem.
Chairman Mc Niel opened the public hearing.
John Ga rasic h, 9233 Rochester Avenve, Rancho Cucamonga, did not recall having
heard of the Smiths in the history of the area. He asked how long the
provision had been in effect to change street names to historically
significant names.
Chairman McNiel stated the City has tried to do so since bet oming a City.
Mr. Garasich felt it would be better to align the freeway offramp to provide
for travel immediately north on Rochester Avenue. He felt Rochester should
run north/south in its present location and the leg turning into Rochester
Court should be named something else. He stated he had already endured two
address changes at his pre se ni location: one address change because he had
been given the wrong address when he first moved there and the second address
change brought about when the post office moved and changed the xip code for
all post office boxes. He felt the cost of new signs, sta tlonery, etc. was
prohibitive.
Rarrye Hanson, Senior Livil Engineer, stated that the proposed Smith Avenue
portion north of 6tA Street 1s only temporary, and the street will become part
of the freeway ramp.
Mr Sa rasa" "' es'ed th6t the Cii
-~v9 y wail until construction of the freeway
ramp, instead of making changes now.
Nearing no further testimony, Chairman MtNie1 closed the public Aearinq.
Chairman McNiet stated ft is unacceptable to have two streets named Rochester.
Fla nning Commission Minutes // -R- March 28, 1990
~tP 0
EXh~b~~+ E
Commissioner Slakes ley stated he traverses the area daily aM he felt the
overall traffic pattern will be better in its ultimate conf lgu ra lion. He felt
the change should be made as soon as possible, because the area is developing
rapidly and delaying the change will only affect more people. He supported
the historic aspect of the name Smith and felt Rochester Court is appropriate.
Commissioner Tolstoy agreed it would be better to have a more colorful name.
He thought perhaps the name could he more indicative of the buildings that
were located in the area rather than just Smith,
Commissioner Chitiea agreed with the assessment of the reasons for the name
change. She thought perhaps a different histar lcai name rnuln bt ;el a;, led.
She did no[ wi<b to ~ __ _m!t!; ,",,;;,,,,~ un a rre eway 51 an.
Mr. Bose stated the offramp sign will state oth Street,
Chairman Mc Niel fe'.t that if the Smith Brothers were siani fi ca nt in the area
their COnLrihp limn ehn~ld ,rAt `vc iyno roe because their name 15 too Cemmpn.
Commissioner Chitiea suggested adding a first name of one of the brothers or
changing the name to Smith Brothers Avenue.
Chairman McNiei suggested staff research the name further and return the item
on April 11, 1990, with additional sugges ttons.
Motion: Moved by Blak esley, seconded by Weinberger, to continue Street Name
Change 90-01 to April tl, 1990. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISS IDNERS: BLAKESLE Y, CHiTi EA, MCNI EL, TOLSTDY, NEINBERfER
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
.. f + .
8:35 P,M. - Planning Commis sign Recessed
8:50 P.M. - Planning Commission Reconvened
• • f R f
F.MENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO CONDITII
-carried
request caonsn a nquor smrc to a t,uz square roos tea sea ce
within the Th Winery Plaza, in the Specialty Commercial riot.
Subarea 2 of the ill Boulevard Spetifit Plan. to d at Clio
nor ihza et. corner of `got 8ouieva rd and Vinegar venue - APN:
208-10]-2l.
Anna-Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner, pre
Planning Commission Ninutes/ -9-
1~/
aff report.
Narch 28, 1990
E-Z
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
OATS: March 28, 1990
T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
BY: Alan Na rren, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: STREET NAME CHANGE NO 90-01 - CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A
nrmpp cgl ±o cn.a nge name of Rochester ..venue ,old portion)
from 4th Street to a point approximately 600 feet north of
6th Street, a distance of approximately 8/10 of a mile.
Suggested name to Smith Rve nue. Proposal to also change
name of that portion of Rochester Avenue (new portion)
south of 6th Street. Suggested name change to Rochester
Court. Alternative street names may be considered by the
Dlanning Commission.
BACKGROUND: On February 16, 1990, the Planning Commf ssion declared
its intent Lo in ilia to the process to rename portions of Rochester
Avenue (Resolution No. 90-23) immediately north and south of
6th Street as requested by Mr. Irving V. Augur of Leisure Crafts.
Thit ar lion roc to 4"n Her ancn tho D1"nnlnn rn".,,:..:nn ~_~
Lhe potential confusion of having two Rochester Avenue
intersections within 450 feet of each other on 6th Street.
II, DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS: The issues analyzed in 4he renaming
process included selection of name(s) appropriate for use in the
general area, and development of a street naming plan for
consideration by the Planning Commission.
Street Names: Staff thought this would be a good opportunity to
consider the use of historically significant names for the new
street name(s). The Nistorit Preservation Commission (HPL)
provided some suggestions for names significant to the area in
question. From the information gathered, staff believes "Smith"
would be the most appropriate. The Smith Brothers, from Rochester,
Pervl SVi Vbnia pained deveinn thn Emm~"lnity of RCC h"eLe." .n iafifj "nd
they operated various businesses near Rothester and 8th Streets
(refer Lo Exhibit "A"),
Other names suggested by the Historic Preservation Commission
include "Amiee", "D1 Carlo", "Lopez", "Masi", and "Yon Fleet" from
families which were involved in the area's development in the late
1800's/early 1900'x.
r~
Exh~b~t F
PLANNING COMMI SSIO ,7AFF REPORT
STREET NAME CHANGE N0. 90-OS - ROCHESTER AVENUE
MARCH 28, 1990
Page 2
Street Name Plan: The solution proposed is that the name change
include all of the Rochester Avenue roadway from its intersection
with lth Street to its "T" intersection with the new Rochester
roadway (just north of 6th Street). Also, the dead end Stub street
just south of 6th Street would be named Rochester fnuri r.e re. ...
.~: -
''`~ ~~~~~i• ine roiiowing issues and impacts were considered in
the selection of this solution:
1. There wavid not be any offset street name intersections.
2. This Plan was fa vnred ~.y .he c, ra a,;d Si;eri ff uepa rtments
3. The need to have Rochester Avenue as a continuous name from the
north to the south parts of Che community may he a mute point
since the City's circulation plans for the area provide for the
eventual abandonment of the Rochester Avenue/4th Street
intersection.
4, This Plan would cause 65 property owners/business
locations/residents to change their address.
5. This Plar, is in conformance with ail provisions of the City's
street naming provisions, City Code Chapter 12.12.
6. Smith Avenue rill aid ,..,,,, n.....:_ .
.. _._ _.. _,.. ,.... ty ~~i„i i.o.
7, Recorded subdivision maps wnuld need to be amended,
9. Utility companies, emergency services and the Post Office would
have to revise their systems to accommoda to the name changes.
9. Street signs will need to 6e replaced.
This Plan was also reviewed by the Postmaster and the City of
Ontario. No concerns were indicated by Ontario. As of the writing
of this report, no response has been received from the postmaster.
[II. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Apart from the minor impacts listed in
Part I, staff does not see any possibility that the street naming
Ple.". would have a SitUn,i firanr efse~t ~,_~ the enYirunment and
therefore, this activity is not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act, per Section 16061(b)(3), If the name
change is approved, a Notice of Exemption shall be filed for the
project as required by CEQA Section 16061(d),
IV. FACTS FOR f1NDINGS; Based an the information contained in this
report and staff analysts of the proposal, it is recommended that
the following findings can be made in regard to this action:
!~3
F-2
PLANNING COMMISSIG ,TAff REPORT
STREET NAME CHANGE N0. 90-OS - ROCHESTER AVENUE
MRRCH 28, 1990
Page 3
A. That the proposed change is consistent w5th the goals, policies
artd standards of the General Pian;
8. That the proposed change i5 consistent with the circulation
element of the General PTan;
;, Th a* the prdpased change will not cause significant adverse
impacts ~;:~^. the environment;
D. That the proposed change is deemed ^^r?ssary to ora tect the
public health, safety, comfort, Convert fence, ~^~ genera?
welfare by correcting the double Rochester Avenue intersecnu~~
at 6th Street.
V. CORRESPONDENCE: This iCe+., ^"s been advertised in ,the D~a fly Report
newspaper, designated areas were pasce~ ~7nno Roc Res ter Avenue, and
written nptices were sent to property owners and
residents/husines sec who faced onto ar aou tted the afTec Cad
portions of Rochester Avenue.
VI. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Cpmmi scion
conduct a public Rearing and consider alt aspects pf the street
naming plan, If the Commission concurs with the justifications for
the staff Rerommend ed Plan, it would be appropriate to approve the
attached Resolution.
/ RL~e~spectful ly submitted,
' Brad 8u ler
City Planner
BB :AN:mlg
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Etiwanda The Pirst 100 Years, Page 12
Exhibit "B" - rea Map of ecammende lan
Resolution of Approval
{ /
~ -3
~ ~ rn
~
~.; ~.' :,.. ,.a0.!
A';'!
. ~. _. . _,.. .....! ..d ..
v~~, c - err-! ~~~.:. Ii1c cc.! r
..u ~ .~.. .. ~. <....
rr .. .... .. .... ...n i. _ .. .~..
a
.C.. .\ .. ... ..~ ~ ~~: 1 .. .. R.I•
, ,. ,..~.i...~ .. ~ ,ii ~ •~. ~~.~lt 'Ll fl r~
. ,.':t .• ~. ,..c .,i...~,. I:t Ihc'
'~"H Iti`~~~ ~ hi~LJfl t'l~r ~hC
1: ('.I .1'.:' 111... ~~i~i ll'~1 .1~
r cog
I,
IM1C ~~va le finlw~~md FU4,^¢H,nn~.l Fr,ui •+
Item: f~1+~sTe9z AUE uNJE a
~~ I z ~
TYUC: E'riwq/JOA, YXa LST ir~YRS, N
Ott: A Ms4: -
F.~
I''.. .i.i i,l 4... ",oqm H,~irl ~.... , ~ . a~.i .. ..
3
,~, of
~~
.d
~ ~~,,,;r~mo
y ~ ~,
r' ~.z
r. ~„.
S~N~ MARINO
0
CO
.o o!
ne~vimNw
~ ~
m owwta:: ii:iiiiii:.
~SWWCEii ii~iiii:.
~a•:::..
I
H
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ITEM: '¢ ^~ NAa1E cMAnK.~
PLANMNG DIVISION'~~ ~,E;1~~MEDED F[.AU AReA MAP N
EXHIBIT: i3 SGLE:
f •'
RESOLUTION N0. 90-23
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO INITIATE THE PROCESS TO RENAME
PORTIONS OF ROCHESTER AVENUE IMMEDIATELY NORTH AND SOUTH
OF 6TH STREET
A. Rzcitals.
(1) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has received a written request
and Justlfication from Mr. Irving V. Augur of Leisure Crafts
to rename a portico of Rochester Avenue south of 6th Street.
(1'.i AL i'c§ regularly scnedui eti meeiiuy vn Feb Nary i4, iiaO, `u`,c
Planning Commission reviewed Mr. Augur's request and
Justlfication.
(f11) That the requested was reviewed pursuant to Section 12.12.040
of the Rancho Cucamonga City Code.
B. Resolution.
NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found. deter+atned and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commiss ton hereby sDeciflcal ly finds that all of the factc
aeL iurcn in me meci*.a15, Part A, or this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon lnfonmatlon presented to this Cowu1551on at the
above-referenced public meeting, lncludtng written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, this Comatsston hereby specifically finds as
follows:
(a) That Rochester Avenue currently intersects 6th Street at
two locations as the result of new Rochester Avenue street improvements and
the retention of the older Rochester Avenue roadway.
(bi That this sltuatton does not comply with the City's street
naming provlstons of Ctty Code Chapter 12.12 and should be corrected.
(c1 That this Comeission hereby directs staff to begin process
to correct ibis street name problem, pursuant to City Code Sections 12.12.040
and 12.12.050, to change the names of portions of Rochester Avenue immediately
to the north and south of its intersection with 6th Street.
(d) That staff shalt provide this Commission with street name
alternatives for its conslderctlon during the formal street naming process.
3. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the
adoption of this Resolution.
I X07
Exh~b~i- G
PLANNING CpMISSIOn nESOLUTiON N0. 90-23
RENANIN6 PORTIONS OF ROCHESTER AVENUE
February 14, 1990
Page 2
APPROVED ANO ADOPTED TNIS 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1990.
PUNNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
R • •C~T
LY f'.~ ?C~t,~,nl
ATTEST: i~~~2~~~1~1~~
I, Orad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Coawlsston of the City of Rancho
Cucaaanga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Coawisslon of the
C1ty of Rancho Cucasonga, at a regular neeting of the Planning Cewalsslon held
on the 14th day of February 1990, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCHIEL, TOLSTOY, MEIMBERGER
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
/~8 ~-Z
lcop should be kept to an absolute minimum. He felt that if ~
P
Commissioner Chitiea It [he loss of the trees for a dian break vrould
create a significant re Lion in the effect the me n is supposed to be
creating. She felt the brea move away from the p ned community theme.
Commissioner Tolstoy felt Chat th median eaks dilute the design of the
pia nned community. /
ton 'n ium project has its major entrance in the middle of the block en
perhaps a project should be rethought. Ne stated that as both m and
Spruce wil a signalized in the future, a driver could make a -turn and
return to the 'ec t.
Lo mmts sto ner Chitiea Stated that the reeks ovld slow dawn traffic.
Chairman Mc Niel felt that Chur Street will be heavily traveled street and
median breaks tend to cause fe Cy problems bec aus of cross traffic.
Commissioner Tolstoy s ed he would like to directs ff to keep cuts in the
median to a minimum Ne requested the developer take er median cuts into
consideration.
Chairman McN~ suggested staff prepare a policy resolution s Cing forth a
minimum d' to nce for length of medians with the minimum gth being
approxi e1y 280-320 feet.
It s the consensus of the Planning Commission that the specific requ t of
t is Homes fora median break an Church Street between Elm Avenue and Sp e
treet be denied and that staff prepare a policy resolution to set a mini
length of medians at approximately 280-320 feet.
.. + . .
J. CONSIDERATION OF RENAMING A PUR 7ION OF ROC NESTER AVENUE
Alan Warren, Associate Planner, presented the staff report.
Commissioner Chitiea asked if alternate names were already selected.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked how far south new Rochester is Dla nned to go.
Mr. Marren responded that a new project has recently been completed to the
south and the street will not go any further south.
Oan Coleman, Principal Planner, stated it will become a cul-de-sac bulb.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked how many established businesses are on new
Rochester.
Mr. Marren responded that there are four buildings, but he did not know how
many businesses were involved.
Planning Commission Minutes -l l- February 14, 1990
~~Oq 6xh~bt't H
Commissioner Blakesley stated that the current traffic flow in the area is
annoying. He asked what the final configuration will be.
Mr. Na rren stated that the old section of Rochester north of 16th will be
abandoned when Che freeway ramp is put '.n place and Rochester would have a
dogleg configuration.
Commissioner Blakesley asked if the offramp is still a possibility.
Russ Maguire, City Engineer, stated that CalTra ns keeps changing its mind. He
said trey currently havz a '-Yalion of one ailz bztwzzr ra ~p s. He stated
the City will keep the offramp in their long-range Dla ns.
Commissioner Blakesley asked why Rochester was not moved in its entirety to
the west to allow one continuous flow. He stated that Rochester now has a lot
of traffic, including truck traffic which cannot negotiate the corner very
well.
Mr. Maguire stated that Rochester will not connect to 4th Street in the
ultimate configuration. He stated that Rochester will come to 6th Street and
end. He said that 6th Street will be a cross-town arterial and the on; off
ramp will actually be for 6th Street.
Commissioner Blakesley asked if Milliken will carry the traffic now on
Rochester.
Mr. Maguire responded that the treffic would be carried on Milliken once
Milliken is completed. He safd that Rochester, south of 6th Street is not
intended to provide anything other than area service.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated it is not appropriate to have an old Rochester and
a new Rochester. He felt staff should be directed to solve the problem. He
felt Rochester should have been planned to go all the way from the north part
of the City to the south.
Chairman Mc Niel stated that when Milliken and Oay Creek are completed some of
the problems will be solved.
Commissioner Blakesley stated this section lies close to the freeway and he
felt it may be aDDropria to to shut it off.
Motion: Moved by Ohltiea, seconded by Blakesley, to adopt the Resolution to
initiate the process to rename Dortians of Rochester Avenue. Motion carried
by the following Vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY, NEINBERGER
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: C0141I55[ONERS: NONE -carried
Planning Comnisston Minutes -12-
(70
February 14, 1990
H- 2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
e
GATE: February 14, 1990
T0; Chairman and Meebers of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
B1: xi an warren, xs soc lace rianner
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF RENAMING A PORTION OF ROCHESTER AYENUE
1. GACxu"RGiirw wiG Dis-i, USSiOWS: ine Planning biv 7s ion has received e
repues ram r. rv ng ugur of telsure Crafts to initiate the
procedure for consideration of changing the nave of cerkin
portions of Rochester Avenue near its intersections with 6th
Street. (Refer to enclosed letter, December 26, 1989.) City Code
Section 12.12.040 allows for the Planning Commission to initiate
the procedure by a Resolution of [nkntlon.
Mr. Augur wii) soon occupy a space within a multi-tenant industrial
building which has frontages on the "old" and "new" portion of
Rochester Avenue Irefer to Exhibit 1). He is concerned over
eO tentla7 rnnfucinn .w~a"ei~~ :.~.- .:,",~; cSS i,iy ui iru f[reeLS w1 Ln
the same name.
The duplication of names was the result of the City's realigning of
Rochester Avenue in antlclpatton of an I-15 Freeway on/off ramp at
6th Street (per General Plan and Industrial Specific P1 an
provisions). When the roadway was reconstructed, staff began
referring to the portion tacated between 4th and 6th Streets, and
closest to the freeway as, "01 d" Rochester. The new alignment was
referred to as "New" Rochester.
All of the street name signs involved list both new and old
roadways as "Rochester Avenue." The nevi street portion terialnaks
as a stub street approxlmakly 600 feet soutA of 6th Street, and
new industrial development south of the street tenainus would
apparently preclude any further exterslon of tha "New" Racheskr.
With additional industrial development expected in the immediate
area, the potential exists for similar street addressing problems
on surrounding parcels. At the very least, the present situation
can be confusing to motorists.
I7~
Cxh'~b'~'t' T
PLANNING COMIISSI01. STAFF REPDRT
RENAMING PORTIONS OF ROCHESTER AVENUE
February 14, 1990
Page 2
After review of the situation by the Planning and Traffic sections,
the Fire District, and Sheriff's Department several al ternatlves,
all of which would improve the situation, are worthy of further
consideration by the Planning Commission.
II. RECOMAENDATION: If the Planning Commission concurs with the
concerns o r. Augur and believes the issue should be studied
a,rrFe. t« W,.,na ti. ..,., ,,...._«~ .~. "~ ;fanning commission W
direct staff to begin the'prrocess to formally Consider renam}ng a
subject portion of Rochester Avenue by the adoption of the attached
Resolution.
Resp lly submitted,
Brad er
City P anner
88:AW:js
nccacnmencs: ~etcer from Mr. Augur, Deceaber 26, 1989
Exhibit 1 - Area Map
Resolution of Intention
~~
i •-Z
PO BOX 5528, 3061 MARIA STREET RANCHO DOMINtiUEZ, CA 90224, PHONE, (213) 7746810 FAX (213) 6324141
~~,w LeBsure~rafts
art and crap melsdel slop 1902
-RECEIVED-
~roF tiwppgawa~~e,
'•.wmr, rrrarM.
December z6, 19s9~ JAN x 199Q
7~B~9~140t1g
[~
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 Baseline
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730
Attention: Brad Buller, City Planner
RE: 9387 Rochestet Avenue
P.C. No. 99-16253
We have entered into an agreement to occupy the building currently
designs tea ae 9307 Rochester Avenue. Two dietlnetly separate bueineesea
will occupy this building. LelaureCrafta Company will occupy Chet
portion of the building facing I-15 and the older airaai currently
Aval nnvf aR nv onnnn Jas r..t al v... nk...._ ..: ,, _--...... ~~-. -_-u ~_ _e
the building facing west and front on a new street designated aey
Roc heater (new71.
This is terribly confusing and over a period of lime will present
problems from a safety standpoint (fire ar police in event of an
emergency), as well as a terribly confusing situation for cuetomare,
suppliers, transportation companies, map mekera, etc.
We expect to occupy these premises about March 15, 1990. Xa would
hope that the City of Rancho Cucamonga could rename ono of thew
atreeta eo that LcieureCref to Company facing seer would have one
street name and number and that Van Aken International fronting
the new street would have another street mare end number.
ihauk lu4 You far your kind eon aideretinn in th±! as ttet, I e.-. ~.L/'A
Sincerely ~ J!!
L6I0[7N~E7~V7'f~ ~ \1~x ~~'f~
3r61ng W. Au~
Preeid~q((t
~~to: P r Co ion
~--~• Ok 173
~ -3
F- North -- ~ -------
r~ t ~- 1 Por. Sec. 18, T. IS., R.6W.,S.B.B.Q 1
~ ~J ~ A'f~4 of Ccwx~ERN Q
ROCHESTER ~A t- - ~ - --
4YIJ " ~ ~ .O a u
~~. s Aj.. 'u M• R. 9~ O ~0~1a ~ Nq C
ira.aa m N
1 u. ~y
~ a O , o '" N ~
~~ O I . • aS ~.. Og~M OOH' .\~~ ~ ilr..e. l~
C ~ h. _e ~
M ~ yt " aog M ~NO~ .,~ ~
/tee i/ ~_ /Ij in ~ _
- .. .. .-._-~.. q1i -
r"'d`j¢ \
~ Iii, - . ~ N
h F ~ I 8O ...~. .~ ~,I
x ,. ~:
a n
o a
N ¢ ~^, ~ N
N ~ N 1'A/M2 ~ ~k1 Y} i
~` " , ` ~ Q~ ` ^ ]I I
_ a~Rr. SD~~aS 0 !lI.IJ ® ~
/L J ZN~9! >LL 71t 7]1,2I
jB1 ~ n M ~ oRt'' ~b ^ _ a A a ~ o M "
.'1~1A~A ".pI ¢ U ~ ~~~ $I 1 '~8 Q m ` S U 115, a I i~.+a.`° ..
~' s.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ITEM; RaUtESTt.,C ~lAUq~C~
PLANNING DIVISION 'ITfI.E: AIC~~Q NAO
EXHIBIT; ~, SGLE: -
1 7~ z- V
RESOLUTION N0. qO" ~~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING STREET NAME CHANGE N0.
90-01 TO CHANGE THE NAME. OF TWO PORTIONS OF ROCHESTER
AVENUE TO CHARLES SM1TN AVENUE ANO ROCHESTER COURT,
RESPECTiVELV.
A. Recitals.
~i) Dn February la. 1990, tnr Pt"^^+~; ,ion or the City of
Ra rc ho Cucamonga, reviewed a written request by Mr."l ruing V. Augur to rename
a portion of Rochester Avenue in the area of its intersections with 6th
Street. On that date, the Planning Commission, by its adoptf on of Resolution
Ne. 90-23, declared its 9n to n4 to initiate the process of re naming the
portions of Rochester Avenue immediately nnr"h ;,qG >vu th of 5th Street.
(iil On March 28, X990, and continued to April ]1, 1990, the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public
hearing for the above mentioned street renaming proposal, Street Name Lha nge
No. 90-01, pursuant to City Code Chapter 12,12 and recommended to the City
Council approval of the street name change.
(iii) On May 2, 1990, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public
hearing for the above-mentioned street renaming proposal, pursuant to City
Code Chapter 12.12.
~iv1 The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division prepared a report which
outlined the Planning Comnfss ion's recommenH,*+^^t _rd ~c;tf~fcacion ror the
gyn.^;:, ;, -~.~~vu ai ce rna to replacement names, and provided copies of the
Planning Commission Staff Reports and Minutes.
(v) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of the Resolution have
occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts Set
forth in the Ret ita l5, Part "A", of this Resd lu lion are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evil eaee presented to this Covntii during
the ahoVe re fere,-,ced pub iic hearing on March 28, 1990, written and oral 5ta ff
reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically
finds as follows:
a, the current Rochester Avenue street renaming situation
which resuits in two (2) Rochester Avenue intersections at 6th Street is
potentially confusing td the general public and emergency personnel and should
be corrected.
175
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0,
STREET NAME CP.ANGE 90-01
May 2, 1990
Pa qe 2
b. The proposed name "Charles Smith" has historical
significance to the general area, as Charles Smith helped develop commercial
activities near Rochester and 8th Streets in the late 1900's,
c. The street name change, "Charles Smith Avenue", applies to
approximately 8/10 of a mile of Rochester Avenue hetween the southern Ra rcho
Cucamonga City limits and its intersection /te rmi mrs wlth rha nnv nnr.a,,,, ,.
nocnester Avenue. '- -~~ -'
d. The street name change, "Rochester Court", applies to that
portion of Rochester Avenue that is approximately 820 feet west cf the I-16
Freeway from its terminus 60U feet south of 6th street to its intersection
,Ji1h r. 1h Cf npc4
e. This proposed street name change would not be ma teriaily
injurious or detrimental to the properties adjacent to Rochester Avenue and
would not have a significant fmpact on the environment nor surrounding
properties.
f. That this street name change proposal is in conformance
with the provisions of the City's Street Naming provisions, City Code Chapter
!2.12.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to 4his Council
during the public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in
nA ra nranh 7 and 7 a6n..o lhie rn....:~ •-_-~.. e
- ~ ~ -• - - ---••_.. ,.,., ",~ ,.iw ., aril wmiuVC) e! fUIlUwS:
a. That the proposed name change is tens istent with the goals,
policies, and standards of the General Plan.
b. That the proposed change is consistent with, and takes into
consideration, provisions of the Circulation element of the Gene rai Plan.
c, That the proposed change will not cause significant adverse
impact upon the environment.
d. That the proposed chartye is deemed necessary to protect the
public health, safety, comfort, convenience, and general weifa re by providing
only one (1) Rochester Avenue intersection at 6th Street.
Th it i,nn nr i, i hnr<hy si.^.d •. th • the
a,, project has been reviewed and
considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
of 197G and determines this action to he er.empt from further environmental
review, as provided in CEQA Section I606t(b)(0), and directs the Lity Clerk to
file a Notice of Exemption wfth the County Clerk, as provided in CEQA Section
16061(d).
5, Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby aDProves, on the 2nd day of May,
1990, Street Name Change No. 90-01, to hecome effective July 6, 1990.
I ~~
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0.
STREET NAME CHANGE 90-01
May 2, 1990
Page 3
6. The Lity Clerk shall send written no tlc es of the change to the
Post Office, County Glerk, Fire District and Sheriff's Department sixty (60)
days before the effective date Of the change.
X77
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAtdONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 2, 1990
T0: Mayor and Members of the C+ty Cou r.cil
FROM: brad boiler, City Planner
av. o;,. r,a.a ei~n... r.,a,, r.. ~.....,mnn• o~n....,,;~,,.
ri-`~
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF NOTICE TO ABATE PUBLIC
NUISANCES - 8493 ETIWAN DA AVENUE - APN: 229-041-1]
KtCUMMtNUAIIUN: It is recommenned coat the t,ty County i deny the appeal
and sustain the Notice to Abate issued by the Cade Enforcement Officer.
BACKGROUND: [n August 1989, Code Enforcement was requested to
investigate property maintenance violations in the Victoria Woods
Apartment project located on Eti wa nda Avenue, south of Foothill
Boulevard. Citizen complaints received by both Engineering and Planning
Divisions reported that the local pedestrian trail along the north
boundary was blocked by overgrown vege to lion and debris. An ir•s pec ciao
of the site confirmed a lack of ma in tena ore of the trail area along the
northern property 6ounda ry. She lack of maintenance and blockage of the
trail constituted a hazard to oed es tr is ns util iz ina this area. In
addition, six flag pole structures were illegally installed along the
Et iwanda Avenue frontage. The flag poles constituted a hazard due to
their illegal construction without required permits or approvals, and
their proximity to the public right-of-way.
?he trail area is located ful iy within the property 6ounda ries of the
Victoria Woods Apartment project. The trail is a part of the original
development of the apartment complex, and is within a Dublic access
easement. The Basement provides a pedestrian connection between
Etiwanda Avenue, a future trail, and a possible park site to be
constructed to the east of Lhe project. The appellant claims that their
obligation for maintenance of the trait area concluded six 16) months
after final approval of the project.
,A,rr on}a tyro ne rnpnr f_y fdn ,,,~infnnanen by the !'!ty AaeS oat aatur
automatically. r The trail area must meet specifications far public
improvements, and landscaping must be established. The area Is then
offered to the City and accepted through a written agreement. Thfs has
not been done. Consequently, the Engineering Div isfon has not
considered this trail area for City maintenance, and the area has never
been annexed into a City operated maintenance district. Unless this
occurs, maintenance of the area will continue to be the sole
responsibility of the private property owner.
I r
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
ORDER TO ABATE
May 2, 1990
Page 2
EFFORTS TO DATE: Code Enforcement first notified the property owner in
a telephone conversation Oc to6er 2, 1989. The flags were removed
following this contact temporarily during the installation of a
permanent monument sign, but were replaced upon final approval of that
sign by the City. No response was made with regard to the trail
maintenance problem. Subsequent personal and telephone contact was made
^th c^p loy2es o - - and the owner's attorney, with no re suits. Un
December 7, 1989, a1Wa rn ing Citation was mailed to the prcpe rty owner,
by certified mail, with no YPSnnn SP rena rd inn the rnwn .. ;,.t, .;o~~
~o rrespondence from the attorney for Pa tsc heck/Nackbarth failed to
address code violations or to acknowledge their presence. (Copies of
the warning ci. to tion and the correspondence are attachedt.
On February t5, ~99n, ba cement proceed logs were initiated.
Following notification ~to'-a 11~ involved par*_ies by certified mail, a
hearing was conducted on March t, +990. Becky Deal, apartment manager,
represented Lhe property owners at Lhe hearing. Information provided
su poo rted the determination that public nuisances existed on the
property which required abatement. A Notice to Abate was issued on
March 9, 1990, ordering specific methods of abatement to be completed
within ten !101 days. The appeal of the order to abate suspended Code
Enforcement action pending a hearing by the City Council.
Since the issuance of Lhe Notice to Abate, the property owner has taken
some action to correct the nuisance violations. the above ground
portion of the flag pole structures have been removed, and
iehauii ica cion or cne crate area one landscaping has begun. Preliminary
contact has also been made by the appellants with the Engineering
Division to int lode the trail area into a City Landscape Maintenance
Cistrict. Completion of all work as required by the Notice to Abate has
not occurred to date.
CONCLUSION: It is staff's opinion that conditions on the property
constitute a public nuisance. At the time of the hearing, the nuisances
existed as described, and the methods of corrections ordered were the
minimum necessary to ensure complete abatement and prevent recurrence.
By sustaining tha decision of the Code Enforcement Officer, the
continuation of the abatement process will ensure that this matter is
concluded in a complete and timely manner.
~ ~
R/.'` c"'ul i" w wit' "'
Bra Bul r
City nner ~_2~~
BB:RA:mlg
Attachments: Notice and Warning of Violation
Notice of Hearing
nhi te~{rtof Rn~a ~onse/1Ga ry A. Oa pelo
zh~~ittAB~ - ~~~eellanp I ~ 9
- i ~ I -I--
CI'!Y OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA I roa oume eo. xl. a.mno eaon,o~y, uuw.m. wm, pul w94Wt
January 16, 1990
CERTIFIED
iaay Patscheck
pi^w_ :, is pa .:ue:,i~
27285-Las Ramblas Ml]0
Mission Viejo, CA 92691
SUBJECT: 8493 ETIWANDA AVENUE/APN N229-041-i1
Dear Mr, Patscheck:
In prior telephone conversa tione, notices given to your
employees, and a telephone conversation with your attorney, Gary
A. Dapelo, on January 3, 1990, you were requested to voluntarily
correct Municipal Codn_ violations. Mr. Dapelo agreed to respond
in writing regarding this matter by January B, 1990; however, no
response was received. An inspection of the property on January
15, 1990 shows these violations still exist:
All property, yards, and buildings shall be maintained in a man-
ner which does not detract from the appearance of the immediate
neighborhood, Coniinuoua maintenance ie required. Landscaped
eivuy lira uer pia pruperay ooundery wlCn oyergroNR, Oea4 ana
decaying vegetation and similar conditions must be corrected.
(RCMC Section 17,OB.070B) '
All signs or decorations which are not expressly permitted are
prohibited. The flags and ISght bulb strings erected et the
property are prohibited and reeoval Se required. (RCMC Section
14.16.020)
The use of flags ie permitted only Sn conjunction Nith en mp-
proved residential eubdlvleion sales office, or a commsrclel or
industrial sales or leeeing ottice. The use of the flags must
also conform to specific requlrementa. The flogs Sn ass et your
location do not meet City requlrementa because an apartment rent-
al/leasing office is not permitted to have flags. Removal Of the
flag. !e requ~re3.
Violation of the Municipal Code is considered a miedemeenor of-
fense. Since the violation has not yet been corrected, a Werning
Citation (attached) is being Sesued. If compliance hoe not been
made by January 30, 1990, the City will have no choice buY to
issue you a corn rt appearance Citation.
~~ 6rn.dn..M„
auw. William 6 Ale+ander Charier l flugnrl II dry Mrarryr
IAnnif L. Slnul nebnrnh N. Brown P.melr i Wriphl leak ism. AICP
Ray Patscheck
January 16, 1990
Page Two
I urge you to contact me to dSscuse this matter. IP you have ahy
questions regarding this second Notice of Violation, the attached
Warning Citation, or the requirements of the Municipal Code,
please telephone me at (T14) 969-1861.
oincereiV,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISS N
i~~~~
Richard L. Alcorn
Code Enforcement Officer
RLA:nas
Attachment: Notice and Warning of Violation No. 2303
cc: Gary A. Dapelo, Attorney
Good, Wildman, Negnese 6 Walley
5000 Campus Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660
IVI
NOTICE AND WARNING OF VIOL._ IONISI
OF CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIpAI COOE
DEPARTMENT Of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Ray Patscheck N0. l.i113
Name
Address .~~~~~~ itiwanda Ave. Rancho r amonda
Your ere hereoy nolllled Met on or aoavt December 7 ,7g, 09 ,
Iha lollowinp eectlonlet al the gancM Cucamorpe Municlpsl Code
were lound In violation:
__ni.vrru- rrUVertV ~IdlnLendOCe. Ldnd<fdnPd
~~rrd along north nronerty bounds rv.
:1.16.029- prohibited S+^ Fla:; and Ll~ti[L
Cnlh strings,
!1. H.05U- lice of Flanst AnarUnent rental/
lnasinq office is not permitted to use flans.
`Continued violation will result in a Court _
Arpearance Ci Latino,
II the elwve vlolatlorNe) of the Ranch Cuamcnpa Municipal Coda
are not corrected wllhin 1'1 drys, salon will Mlakan In
kswnq OlHCer R. Alrnrn Dete .(4/lE/90
Tole :111n Fnfnrramnnt Ofrr phone .(.jjq.~.~jj. _roct
WARNING; Any perwn violating enY of the provisions
or failing to comply with my of tha mandatory requin-
menes of th< Code [M11 be guiiry cl • misdamearror. Any
person cenvieted of < miMememor urlMr Me proeisiom
of the Cade, [hall M subprct to < lim not to eACead Ifva
hundred dollsn 15600.00), or to imprisonment for a period
not to exceed six 161 mpnMe, or to both loch fim eml
imprisonment.
ISN Oanllllaa Sac. a1.Opg01eXg) of IM RandM Cuumonpa
a
_~
L
O ~
9 C
_ t
W
C
N
/^~
Nol'SCE w NP191ING RV IiC177AIIHB T!@ atIS1T2CE w A PUBLIC NUISAt~B
AIID ABAI4 ZN 491JL¢ OR IN PARE
HOLiQ 1a hereby given the m th Sat day of 1au;dt, 1990, at the lair at
u:ao . of acid e.y, th ceae fltrott.®,t drrit:r or th eiey of pettch0
Cucsvga or their duly au[horirM teluvsmWtive will hld a Public Neeriro
at Pancho Llaamp City Hall, located at 932C Beee ..ne POad, f/ancM
Cucamatya, to ascxrtain thtner certain preelaea aitwted Sn the City of
Pancln Curaaaps, Stale of Callfornla, WIwI ctrl daiypeted m:
Streci Addteea: Ja93 C115AlAA AVk7eR qpH a229-0a1-11
Cescrlptlm: Parcel located m tee mrtheeat coxrer of ttitnrda Avenue
std Arrow Rape
crostitutes a Pub11c mifaaice aub~ec< to ateteaent by the tehabilitatim of
such ptenlsea Or by eh repair or de:olitlm of bullditpa or sttvctutea Or i,o-
ptovaenta situatM thereat.
Airy ptvele® or cadltime threw Wrh are foutd, in tFole or in pert, Co
^aut!^,tte a ?lbllc Nofemtcr en 'sfi.~t ,,y ar.i~ H.?3.050 a^L 9.23.~C cf
tee Ratr.M LUaavga Mmieipel Code, wM h pttaptlY abated q' ter weer or
patron in p®m1m of ouch Pttaisea. If not ptvptly abetad, such tatlasncee
may h abated W a:mSeipal authoritlee and LM ratrhiliatim, eepair m
dttmolltlm M71 he aaaeeaed t@m stlrh preafa~ Yd auOh rata will a:tetltute
a lien upm such lard mail peed.
Rr seeped violatiar owrlat of the fol7owiq:
1. SLbatantial latlt of ~1lttatrtlm ar rrpiact of ptepQty slap th tnrtlern
ptvperty traadnY W th axletenw of ovarytan, datd or daayinp vepeta-
t1m.
2. Iecal feeder trails rltldt an Saprlble ar t9rate bltdad by tw9etatlm
std lacklro PrnPer mintatwtce.
3. Stx ~6) !lq pole atructuraa S11e0W1y Strtallad and oartltvtiq a hezaN
to padeatrlur.
Re aeUtode of abateaant available ue:
3. PeMbilitatlm of th latNacaplq aM cmtiaad ealntanrxv of lattlacepiro
slap the tvrttem pxoprty botadary.
2. Aafrbilitatlm of trail/tall area std cantittuad .aittcm.ar to pteuatt
blotlapea aM utwfe caditim.
3. Rental Ot six (8) flq poL etrucnaw std Eaadatl0tr.
All petaae havlq sty oblactlm to, or intent 1n seed mitten, are hr'a'bY
rotltld to acted Bald hsrlro, td:a+ thlr trtfaary std aviaanoa will tr
bald erd q1v~ due otaridantlm.
Neeriq 0ltScer: R1rlterd L. Alwm, Code Cttorc~K 9uparvleor
tAfIC! 239Um AID W1I[Sl:
Rte. loth day~+~/ 1
Issued a:
wtdria L. AlpOltl
Caa. mttnrOr~t apervl.er
crn w f7AI1CIU alcAlaaA
rudxno olvlnon/Lens mvcAClo~rr
9390 M76 LIti RDAO
RAlIL7p CU'M~N011, CALII0191IA 91730
183
n
I.AW OFFIC E9 OF
„ aAAIR EFO GOOD. WiLnncex. HE6wE99 Ec W~LLEY
a
q=
„ w„, co
oo
o
O
p
wLC ou 90~9o 5000 CwMPUS ORIVE c
~R~ef
c ea yr vcwpos>'~u~~. csutoaxu eseeo
c
~
y o.u~w. wl.owAly
O UG..A 99
[
„U B
F• 1, 955 ~i100 I~!• ~~.1)
nEC9[
4 M1E4
F
P
e
C
I
O„n
A 9T
L„.y A
LOJi]
G aIAOOHA
F'3rIN[ • ~Ra
~~O LAS w ViC+E9v
_o.a E w.u cr
rAn hl•) eaa~oeaa
Fnhr~a ~r~ 07 In den
yZA FEDERAL EZPRB88
P.i- -- .,orr.
Code-Enforcement Supervisor
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division/Code Enforcement
9320 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Re: 8493 Etiwanda Avenue, APN A229-041-11
Hearing to Date Nuisance March 1, 1990
Time 11.00 a m
Dear Mr. Alcorn:
The purpose of this letter is to resoond to a Nntino .]f
Hearing to Determine the Existence Of Public Nuisance And Abate The
Nuisance In whole or In Part which is scheduled for hearing on the
above-referenced date. Further, this letter is an attempt to
resolve those issues prior to any hearing on the matter due to a
serious conflict with both my calendar and the calendar of the
owners of the subj sot property which make it virtually impossible
£or an authorized representative to attend the hearing presently
scheduled. However, the manager of the property, Ms. Rebecca Deal
will be available to attend should that need arise. Please notify
immediately upon receipt and review of this correapondenca whether
indeed such attendance is requested.
we will respond to each o! the three alleged violations in the
order presented as follows:
Allegation No. 1. Substantial lack of maintenance or neglect
of property along the northern property boundary by the existence
of overgrown, dead or decaying vegetation.
Response: According to the conditions of approval the problem
at the northern boundary is a result of the cities failure to
maintain the pedestrian walkway originally constructed for the
benefit of the community to the north at the sole cast of the
developers. Said conditions of approval required the developers
I S~
~~
Richard L. Alcorn
February 27, 1990
Page 2
to maintain the landscaping along the walkway for a period of six
months after the projects final approval. The linal approval oP
the project was November 2a, 1988. Therefore our clients agree
that the nuisance should indeed be abated. However, the culpable
parties, the city itself, is not our clients. We would greatly
appreciate year assistance in abasing the nuisance.
Allegation No. 2. Local feeder trails which are impassible
or unsafe blocked by vegetation and lacking proper maintenance.
Response: We would reincorporate by teference the fwets r?ieed
in response to violation number i as the same holds true with
regard to the local feeder trails.
Allegation No. 3. Six (6) flag pol• atructurea illegally
installed and constituting a hazard to pedaatriana.
Response: It is our client's contention that trio Plaq poles
create no hazard whatsoever to padestriane and that no evidence of
such hazard exist because these flags era well maintained in the
area above the waterfall^ fenced oft from any pedestrian making it
virtually impossible Por a pedestrian to be affected in nny way 6y
the Plags.
In closing, wnlle our chants have indicated that they do not
wish to antagonize you any further, it Sa their position that you
have by bringing these unjuatitied and unsubstantiated claims
attempted to harass or otherwise personally confront our clients
without justification. The basis for our cli.nt contention in this
regard ie that there were no citations issued, no prior written
warnings or notifications sent other than telephone calls, cite
visitations by you or your reprasentativaa wherein employees and
others were threatened with going to jail if they did not
immediately remove the offending slgna without nuthorization form
their superior.
We trust that our response ko this matter end the lasuas
raised will be investigated by you and the hearing will ba taken
off calendar indefinitely.
Vary truly yours,
D, WI , HS SS 4 WALLEY
.i
A. O
GAD/jmm
1 ~~
NOTICE TO ABATE
No tic• is hereby given by the Code Ento cement Ctticer at the City
of ftanc F.o Cucamonga, or their duly authorized representative, that
by virtue of pro cretll ngs under the authority or the Rancho
:.u camm:ga Municipal Code Section 4.23.010:
YCU ARE HEREBY NOT IPZEp TO ARATR PROM VOUR PRCPRRTY SITUATLp IN
THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, sTATL OP GALIFORN IA, KNONN ANp
DESIGNATED AS,
^~ ..__. _,._, e.ra eu Wanda Avenue APN m229-OU^I1
Description. Parcel located on the northeast corner of Etlwanda
Avenue and Arrow Route
where the owner is listed in the County of son Bernardino
Assesa or'a/Tax recn M. +e•
Patscheck/Nackbarth, A General Part nerahip
27285 Loa Rsablae, Su1[e 110
Mf aefan Vfeio, CA 92691
the PuD31e Nuf aanca(a), aM ut311z1ng the wthad(e) of correc Lion
u outlined !n Exhibit A of thU NotSCa to Abate.
If said nuiaancee are not abated wlehSn ten X10) days of the date
this notice was Sseued, the Cade Lntorceaant Ottlcer may order
said conditldna abated by public esployeea, private contractor, cr
ocher persons, and the coat of Bald abatement and all directly re-
leced inveetlgatlve and edel nlatraiive costa shall be bl lied
di ree tly to the property owner or levl ad and uaeasa0 against the
property ao a special aoasaurtt lien.
AaY appeal trop Lola order moat ba !n wri tf ng and brought within
ten (10) days o! the dace of this notice to the CSty Clerk, woo
will sec the sane for hearing before the City Council and no tlfy
you o[ the data of auto hearing.
Failure to abate or to aDPeal within the times allotted may also
make you subject to criminal and civil remedies. Your cooparatidn
is appreciated,
NOTICE I49UZp AND MAI:,=~:
This ~9'h_ day o[I/_'~/~RjL~X_/_'___J 1990,
Issued 9y: Richard L. Aj
Code Lntor<ament Suparvfaor
CITY OE RANCXD CUCAMONDA
PLANNI Ng p1VI320N/GOOF LN-ORC 6MENT
43T0 BA9L LINE ROAD
RANONO CUCAMONOA, CALIPOflNIA 91730
Si/
Notice to Aba ee i8xhlblt A
Bt93 eLwanda, RencRO Cucamonga
Match 9, 1990
L1®I62T A
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIPIEO TO ABATE FROM VOUR PROPERTY THE PDLLOWING
PUBLIC NUISANCE(9~, AND UTILIZING TH888 METH00(S) OP CORRECTION:
Vlolatl On: Su hetant Sal lack c! maintenance or negleec oY
property along the northern property boundary by cne exist-
ence of overgrown, dead or decaying vegetation.
lSndingm: She indicated area is located within the property
tine hnsnder La ^f •he sab!ecf ~ -v a!-!-^-~ -~• _
is ..a nfn a pedestrian access easement (frail), there is no
agree me of on record authorizing or requlrinq the C1fy of
Rancho Cucamonga to provide aaintenance. The malntena nee of
sand ncaplnq or other improvements located on this private
property is the responslDillty at the property atmer.
kethod ^! Ccrrr_t!an: Tn. reeovat and oromor eiapoeal ~! the
existing overgrown, deaq and decaylnp wgetatlon, and debris.
Repair of Srrigatlon system to proper tuncclonlnq.
Recondlfioninq of soil and the replacement of plant materlale
as Oer the origSnal development landacapinq Dlan. Contlnuaua
melnCenanee of plant materials and landscaped areas in a
healthy, thrlvf nq condition free of deferloration, weeds and
the accumulat!an of deDrls.
Violation: Lucel feeder trolls whleh are SmDaemSble ar un-
safe, blocked by vegetation and lacking proper uintenance.
if nd Sngm: The maintenance of local Peed •r trolls and fa-
provements located within eaaeasntc on privaca property is
the responnlbility of the pioDerty owner,
lNthod o! eorHCtion: Overgrown vega tattoo and debris which
is encroachlne enr~ •h. rears .,,.n.,.. .... wt^^~~^.. .
shall be removed and dSspoeed of properly. Continuous main-
tenance of the trefl area is regal red.
VSofatloa: 51x (6) flag po]a structures illegally Snntalled
and cone citutlnq a hazard to psdeetrians.
l1 Mlnpm: Plaq pole afructuree were Snefal Ld without City
al ~:^°n' and without required permits or itu pectin ne. The
proximity of the lllegml atructuro and LAe1r open aeceu to
the pu bite rlpht-ot-way/public eldew lk tonal ltu cem a hazard
to pedwe cr3sns.
Method o! eorractlon: The removml oC the six (6) Clap pole
et ructuro lnclud Snq the Dolu, bases, tootlnp• and taunda-
Uone.
'~~
d'
~ o
W ~-•~
N
~°
u 1 .
~`~
U~
n a ~ 3lbN3Ad
i'~ N ~ v m~
~~~ v~
:,~
M
J ~1
J J I
n - ~
0
8N ~ ® ;
~ rv
r c
is
I~~
~, ,
y
''
~,
~~~
~ Z
J O
h M
~Y/N3AV
n
0
U
/y~ uNN
~-'i aOCr
w
z~
N j
Jo tl
L
6
~~ ~_ Y
!!'11^
p U quo V.;~ ~~e
,~ a
y
_ ri
u v
p~
1 ® FxNIBIT i,R,~
r ~8$
~W 4
and $
om
g~
$ a
~4~
~qC
.~:t a"aa
V O
$my
<<
Ali o
~~
.,~
~~
~ v
z
D
z
ti
N
~ N
H
~ ~ a v
z
~~ ~~
~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~
^~
~ ~ .;
~~~~~~~%
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING DIVISION ' 8A
4'
Z~
a
rn ~
z .-.
a m
~~
m -i
-i~r
moo..
D ~ N
~ ~
O Z
J~ 3
C71 D
~A 'O
~. S I \I .
ITEM:
Tl1'LE:_ ~lTt= ~_ N
EXFiISTT:~~ SCALE:
CITY OF RANCHO C1iCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT ~
~_~
~- '
DATE: May 2, 1990 €-~ -1
.~ ~
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM:
Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer I
BY: Monte Drescher, Public NorKS Engineer i
SUBJECT: Tract 13318, Mayflower-Bayoun, Developers request of April
25, 1990 to accept a cash deposit in lieu of withholding '~,
occupancy. I,
BACK6ROUMD/ANALYSIS
The subject tract is complete except for the establishment period of
landscaped areas to be pubtically mafntained.
Construction of this development has presented no unusual problems. The
landscaping work did not commence until recently and the designated
establishment period is 6 months.
Staff, pursuant to Resolution No. 88-557, is withholding occupancy on one
dwelling until such time the establishment period has been completed. It
is aooarent that wi thholdina the dwelli na may exceed what is necessary to
meet the intent of the resolution.
The developer has proposed to post a cash deposit to insure that the
establishment period is completed.
The proposed amount appears to be sufficient. The area is Landscape
Maintenance District No. 1 and contains approximately 7,420 square feet
of groundcover area and approximately 24 trees in resident maintained
parkways. The current contract for groundcover maintenance is f0.0189
per month per square foot, The current average cost of maintaining new
parkway trees is 522,00 a year each. This totals to 5841.43 and 5264.00
or E905.43.
Respectful.l:y~}ubmi tted,
i ~ iii, i gA r
RHM:MP:pam
Attachments
~1a~~flower-aayoun
REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS
Apri' 25, 1990
uAND ^PLIVERED
Mayor Der.P.is L. Stout
Members Of The City Councel
Rancho Cucamonga. Ca. 91729
„__,,, ,y_, nehv,; anama. City Clerk
Gentlemen:
~a ce 1 of 2
r~ ` TI
~ ~ ~
w ~ ~. -'
~~
Mayflower-sayoun is the developer of Tract X13318, commonly
knowr. as Hermosa Vistas. All the homes in Hermosa Vistas
have been sold except one, Lot 18. commonly known ae 10191
Kernwood Court. Although Planning has signed off on Lot 18,
Engineering has not, pending completion of the Landscaping
Establishment Period required by City Council Reaolutlon
ae-nor. In Lne case of Hermosa VSStas, all public
improvements and landscaping are now field complete, and the
Landscaping Establishment Period has commenced.
The undersigned finds itself in a bit of a problem.
Thinking that we wculd have completed the Landscaping
Establishment Period by new, we entered into a contract to
sell Lot 18. we have extended the escrow time after time,
and our buyers are becoming quite upset with us and tired of
living in rented quarters. We fear that we are going to be
sued. What we would like to do is io accomodate both the
legitimate expectations o! the City and of our buyers, namely
we would like to get our buyers into their home and ensure
that the city will be put to no expense during the Landscape
Establishment Period. To that end, we propcse iv post a cash
bond with the City in the amount of 51,500.00. Our contract
with The Landscape Center provides for for 5750.00 to cover
both the anticipated monthly maintenance charge for the
landscape during the Establishment Period, plus the cost of
replacing the pnrceniage of trees and ground cover, etc.
likely to fail during the Establishment Period, We have
doubled that number to $1500.00 to arrive ai our cash bond
offer.
Iq-
!1!1 ri ILI\1'I1 .\\f'IIUI'. hlllh' Lell • Ih ll ll 'hfl (~l l~ lllllutl}(r 1. 1'..\!117a1) • IT I~Li 4)J~F 11.41e1
mayflower-Bayoun
REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS
page 2 of 2
We respectfully request the City to allow us to post the
said cash Sond and to waive the requirements oP Resolution
88-557, thereby allowing engineering to sign ott on Lot i8.
=he City's acceptance of our offer would enable Mr. A Mrs.
Lo rg. (ocr bayers) to move into their home and would
guarantee the City a satisfactory completion of the
..~..cscapng estaolishment Period for Hermosa Vistas.
?lease contact the undersigned with question or comment.
S i~ncetely~
\ i
..ohn Baayoun.
Ma}~tlower-Bayour.
f 9.~
!)_'1 ii II. I\r'rl .\\r'IIUI•, ~iU llr' I: dl • hill trl trl 1.1 lr ,Irl l(111}~J.. l:~\ 1117:311 • ii131 O-V-1-!13r Mr
~~~("
I . ~ ~"-
April 24, 1990
CITY COUYCIL OF RANCHO CUCMIONGA
RE: RESOLUTION A 88-557
DEAR 2IE"IBERS:
THIS LETTER IS TO REQUEST TO BE ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY
COUNTIL 21EETING PIAY 2, 1990.
i~1R. JIPI LONG HAS PURCHASED A HOME AT 10191 KERNWOOD, ALTA
LC^IE IN THE HERMOSA VISTA TRACT.
ST IS PI5' UNDERSTANDING FROM THE ACENT FOR THE BUILDER THAT HE
IS WILLING TO PLACE MONEY IN THE CITY TREASURER FOR THE PURPOSE
OF .!A INTAINING THE PLANTS THROUGH THE ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD .
CYDER THE ABOVE MENTIONED CIRCUMSTANCES M'E WOULD
LIKE A WAIVER ON TIIE F,S T,4 BLISHMENT PERIOD SO THAT
THE BUYER MAY CLOSE THE ESCROW ON HIS HOUSE.
THAYK 1'OL' FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.
SINCERELY,
~ ~
SUE SINGER
Iq3
Rff/ ~ 9n-~ smpin
9959 amhlbald, auNe 190
oncho cuumonya, ca111omia 91790
~n.no~' phone: (71{) 999.5688
i May 2, 1590
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
._. .-, -, u,^`er=_ c` the City Council ant City Manager
FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director
BY: Jerrv R. Grant. Building Dfficial
SUBJECT: RESIDENTIAL AND C01lIERCIAL BUILDING STREET ADDRESSING
RECDMMENDAT ION
-C coc^MO,yr,
~^ 9
z 1 [
rJ ~' A
J t`_ ~ iD
19 i7 i
It is recommended that the City Council review the accompanying draft
ordinances and provide direction to the staff regarding acceptability of the
proposals. If determined to meet the Counci]s desires, we will advertise and
schedule hearings as necessary for the ordinance at a future council meeting.
BACK6RDUND
At the City Council meeting of March 1, the City Council directed staff to
prepare ordinance than ge!s) Lhat would improve the visibility of building
street addressing thereby improving emergency response and citizen
accessibility. Staff was also directed to further investigate and review the
potentials of a program of curb house number Painting either through city
contract with an independent contractor or through a system of permits to
service clubs and/or charitable organizations.
gNAI.YSIS
Staff has prepared the attached ordinance revising the minimum size of
identifying street numbers and adding provisions for erecting street address
signs for commercial, industrial and multi-building developments located so as
to be vi=_ible from travel lanes of adJ scent streets. Review of the design,
inrati n_n anri vivini i;t,v wtm id i,e ai LUilvii5h ed a5 dart of the dcVciv~2iit
review process.
In regard to the issue of curb painting, staff has contacted several nearby
cities that have undertaken programs of house numbering. A number of
interesting comments were returned during the data gathering process.
of the cities contacted, the majority favored utilization of an outside
contractor to perform the project. Repainting of residential properties was
accomplished on a two or three year cycle at costs varying from f1.8ti to f2.46
per address, The advantages of using a single firm for the task were the
Staff Report: Residential and Ca~rercial Building Street addressing
~Y 2, 199U
Page 2
minimal amount of administration necessary, and the ability to control
uniformity of the process. The principal disadvantage is the need for
allocation of funds to pay the costs. Using a three year cycle, costs would
he approximately $30,000 per year for Rancho Cucaman ga.
Those cities that are utilizing or have allowed independent or non-profit
or na niratinns to solicit work from homeowners related varying criticisms of
the methods used in solicitation, disparity in uniformity of numbering,
inaccuracy ;n numbering, etc. Others indicated that service clubs seemed
disinterested in undertaking the jobs, apparently because of the need of
special izeA equi Anent and/or physical abilities in working so close to the
ground. The major advantage of allowing independents to do the work is that
no direct costs accrue Yo the City.
[n as much as there are advantages and disadvantages to each alternative,
staff has prepared an ordinance which would allow for either process. The
document also provides for standards to be followed by those performing the
task which should result in the highest practical degree of uniformity
practical. It is anticipated that these standards would be developed by staff
in the interim.
siRnaRr
The accompanying ordinances will revise the street addressing provisions of
the Municipal Code consistent with Council direction of March 7th, and also
provide for a permit process and standards for curb address painting either by
°i t° coctr ac t^r ^• :nde~o„no„t nroansva r.i nn. If either or both ordinances
appear satisfactory to the City Council, the staff will schedule them for the
action agenda.
19~
,RAFT Qi~~.~.°
ORDINANCE N0.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO COCAMONGA ADDING CHAPTER 8.27,
ENTITLED "PAINTING OF STREET ADDRESSES ON
CURBS", TO TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE.
A. Recitals.
(i) A uniform method of painting street addressed on curbs is
necessary for expedient response by emergency services.
(ii) Establishing a permit requirement and development of uniform
standards for persons performing such pa ir~ting is an appropriate method of
assuring uniformity.
(iii) A71 legal prerequisi is to the adoption of this ordinance have
occurred.
B, Ordinance.
NOw, THEREFORE, the City Counr.il of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
does hereby find, determine and ordain as follows:
SECTION 1; In all respects as set forth in Lhe Recitals, Part A, of
this Ordinance.
SECTION 2: Title 8 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, entitled
"Health and Safety", of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby amended by
addition of Chapter 8.27 to read as follows:
Cha Dter 8.2)
PAINTING OF STREET ADDRESSES ON CDRBS
Sections:
8,27.010 Permit Required
8,27.020 Business License Required
8.27.030 Minimum Standards for Curb Numbering
$ 27 Leh permir GonniPed Hn narynn; fiPiil, CD'rLardtiGn or
partnership sha11~ paint, stenci or otherwise mark upon any curb, street,
roadway alley or sidewalk within the City, and house number or address without
having first obtained a public works Dermit from the City Engineer or his
designee.
I~~
Ordinance No.
Page 2
8,27,020 Business License Required. Any person, firm,
partnership or corporation engaged in the painting of house numbers pr street
addresses on any curb within the City for any ren umbe ra tion, whether by
donation or otherwise, shall first obtain a business license from the
Administrative Services Director or his designee.
8.27.030 Minimum Standards for Curb Numberina. Numbers painted
or stencilled on curbs shall be done so in accordance with City standards.
Copies pf the standards are to be Drovided tp permitees upon issuance of the
SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this ordinance and the City Clerk
shall cause the same to 6e published within 15 days after its passage at least
once in The Da ilv Report, a newspaper of general Circulation published in the
City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California.
PASSED, APPR04ED, and ADOPTED this 2 day of May, 1990
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Dennis L. Stout, Mayor
19?
DRAFT 0 N LY
ORDINANCE N0.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO LUCAPIONGA AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE BY DELETING PORTIONS OF SAN
BERNRRDINO COUNTY PROVISIONS ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE
N0. 17, ENTITLED POSTING OF STREET NUMBERS AND BY
ADDING CHAPTER 8,26 ENTITLED "STREET ADDRESS
POSTING". TO TITLE 8 OF SAID RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE.
A. Recitals.
(i) The County of San Bernardino has adopted a uniform system of
house numbering for the County and said uniform numbering system has be. en made
a p"~ C ,.~ ~,~t ...,,.-ty Ocncra'. Pla,..
(ii) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has continued the County uniform
numbering system since incorporation.
(iii) It is necessary for the purpose of emergency response to
maintain a numbering system that is consistent with other jurisdictions and as
free of confusion as possible.
(ivj Ali iegai prerequisites to [he adoption of this ordinance
have occurred,
n~Afn~nn~
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
does he r_by find, determine and ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: In ali respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part R, of
this Ordinance.
SECTION 2; Sections 63.071 through 63.076, inclusive of the San
Bernardino County Code adopted by Ordinance No. 17 of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga are hereby deleted,
SECTION 3: Title 8 of the Rancho fucamonga Municipal Code, entitled
"Health an S~", of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby amended by
addition of Chapter II.26 to read as follows:
Chapter 8.26
STREET ADDRESS POSTING
Sections:
8.26,010 Assignment of Street Addresses
8.26.020 Posting Required
-98
Ordinance No.
Page 2
8.26,030 Size and location of Numbers
8,26.040 Multi-Building Properties
8.26.050 Street Address Numbering Review
8.26.060 Enforcement
8.26.010 Assignment of Street Addresses. Street addresses
shali be designated and assigned by the Community Development Department, a
designated division thereof or other agency in cooperation with the Conmu nity
Development Department.
8.26.020 Posting Required. Street address numbers shall be
cons picously posted on each building located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
E$CEPTI DNS:
1. Buildings accessory to residential buildings.
2. When street address numbers for a single family residence would
not be visible from the street due to distance from the street or
obstruction, numbers may be posted on a post or other independent
structure. Such post or structure mounted numbers shall
otherwise meet the requirements of this chapter. Numbers posted
on free standing mail boxes, are acceptable under the provisions
of this subsection provided no more than cne mailbox is instal', ed
at the same location.
a ~e nxn Ci>o and Inra Linn of Nnmhers. All street address
numbers posted pursuant to Lhis chapter shat meet the following minimum
requirements:
a. Numbers shall be no less than four (4; inches in height with a
corresponding width.
h. Numbers and their background colors are to be of significantly
contrasting shades.
c. Numbers are to be readily visible and readable from the street on
which the building or building fronts.
d. Numbers painted on curbs are not acceptable as a substitute for
the requirements of this chapter.
8.26.040 Multi-Building Properties. Properties developed with
more than one main building and where visa bil ity to alt building street
numbers from the street is obstructed or is otherwise unreadable, shall, in
~qR
~.
Ordinance No.
page 3
addition to the numbering for individual buildings, also be provided with
independent structures located adjacent to the street frontage upon which the
address numbers have been assigned, showing in readily visible fashion, the
oeginning and ending numbers assigned to that parcel. Mhere numbers are
assigned on more than one street frontage, such independent structures shall
be provided on each frontage.
8.26.050 Street Address Numbering _Re view. For other than
single family residential properties, location, size, contrast, visibility and
mnnnt inn_ of cir"nt nAdnn« n.nn~.n-. in. n _ -~..i, .~ .,s ~,... .. ,..a ,
part of review under the "Land Developmen tV Review" process of Chapter 17.06 of
the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
8.26.060 Enforcement. The Fire Chief of the Rancho Cucamonga
.. .~ ..~ ~ Gr C.._. _ _. _.. _. .. _... _.~ _ ~ _ ..~..u ._.....
provisions of~thi s~cha pte r. -
SECTION 4: The Mayor shall sign this ordinance and the City Clerk
shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least
once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the
City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California.
pASSE"u, AppRDV'cD, and ADOpTEO this 2 day of May, 1990
AYES:
NOES:
A6SENT:
Dennis L. Stout, Mayor
.~ (~(~
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
May 2, 1990
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
GUCAMp
~9
~' ~ r
z J
O'i. VO
Fi ~ j'Z
iD
19ii ~~
Mayor, Members of City Council and Clty Manager
Joe Schultz, Com~un±ty Services Earager
"3-Ej4k9RARY VARIANCE OF THE SPORT FIELD LIGHT
POLICY FOR THE DATES OF JULY 8-20. 1990
To approve the temporary variance of the sports field light
curfew policy at Red Hill Citrus Little League senior field
(northwest corner) for the dates of July 8-20, 1990.
The current sports field light policy curfew is 10:00 p.m.
The citrus Little League requests a temporary variance of the
10:00 p.m. baseball field light curfew so that they can host
the District 21 Senior League All-Star Tournament.
A similar variance was granted to Citrus Little League two
years ago by the City Council.
ANALYSIS
This variance will apply only to the 90-foot base path field
located at the northwest end of Rad Hill Park.
The variance requested ie as follows:
1) 12:00 (midnight) curfew from Sunday, July 8 through
Saturday, July 14.
`~j j7n lighting +^eguired -.. c,_nday~ .z„1y /5.
3) 12:00 (midnight) curfew from Monday, July lb through
Friday, July 20.
4) Thia variance will apply only to the 90-Loot baaa path
field located at the northwest and of Red Hill Perk.
!~
TEMPORARY VARIANCE OF SPORT FIELD LIGHT POLICY
May 2, 1990
Page 2
So~RY
As mentioned above, this variance was granted to Citrus
Little League two years ago so that they could ..*.os*_ the
^!_t"ict 91 senicr :.eagae Aii-Star Tournanant. Staff
recommends this variance be granted again in 1990.
Respectfully submitted,
l~ ilY
J sc ultz
Community s ces Manager
JS/kls
Attachment
.a Da'
ATV OF (;~. G ,
P.O. Box 533 APP. 1~
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 N
o,q,n,lldZ)i)`~13+~
April 11, 1990
Mr. Dennis Stout, Mayor
icy ox rtancno uucanonga
9320 Baseline Road
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
R8: TEMPORARY VARIARC6 08 TR8 8I8LD LIDBT CCRPSW
Dear Mayor Stout,
CStrue LSttle League would like request a temporary variance of
the 10:00 P.M. baseball Pield light curfew for the dates of July
09 through July 20. This request Se being made so that Citrus
Little League can hoot the Dietriet 21 Senlor League all-afar
tournament. Diet rlct 21 boundaries are from Rialto to Rancho
Cucamonga along the Interstate 10 corridor. We feel that hosting
this tournament Se a greet opportunity to show our neighboring
communities the Pine public faeilitiee that are afforded the
youth sports organizations by the City of Rsncho Cucamonga.
Please note that hooting these types o! tournaments are at beet a
"break even" moneiary activity for our league and Ss not looked
nnnn ac r hmd nw Llnn w.nt by rltnn.
The variance requested Se ae lollowe:
I) 12:00 curfew from Sunday July 08 through Saturday July 1/
2) No Lighting required on Sunday July 13
3) 12:00 curlew from Monday July i6 through 8riday July 20
4) Thie variance will apply only to the 90 foot baeepmth field
located at the north end of Red Rill Park (CStrue Senlor
League FSeld).
We are forwarding this request to you upon the recouendation of
Mr. Joe Shoulte. Please advise us of any requirements that we
must meet or actions thwt are required of us to aid the vsrlance
granting process.
Aa always, please call me should you hays ar.Y questions ar
require aeeistence in this matte!.
Sincerely,
(/C/ImT/R/~Uf~S~`L S t t le/~/~L,eya~^g/ue
Boyd` P. K~~Preeident
7976 Layton St.
Rancho Cueemongs, CA 91730 n O 1
home phone: (731) 9{• - 9716 d _7
work phone: (213) 260 - 1770 or (7111 625 - {721
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Diane O'N881
Admin tat rat ive Analyst
SVBJECT: PAOP086D HATER CONSERVATION RESOLUTION PROM
CHINO &18IN MUNICIPAL RATER DISTRICT
RECOq¢NDATYON
IT IS RECOMMENDBD THB CITY COUNCIL REFER THS DRAFT WATER CONSERVATION
RESOLUTION TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMNISSION POR REVIEW AND
SUBSEQUENT RECOMlgNDATIONS FOR THE COUNCIL'S CONSIDERATION.
BACROROVND
The City received the attached request from the Chino Basin Municipal Hater
District to adopt a water coneervat ion resolution.
Water coneervat ion ie not new to the City. Recently, the City adopted a
xeriscape ordinance and has supported the of torte of the Cucamonga County
Water District to achieve voluntary water coneervat ion in the past.
The issue of water coneervat ion Ealle within the purview of the City's new
Environmental Management Commleeicn, and it is recommended the Commission be
allowed to review the Diet rict •e request to adopt the attached water
conservation reeolut ion and make n recommentlatlon to the City Council.
Ree etfully submitted,
~,~..- G` r~/~
Diane O'Neal
Adminietrativo Ane lyet
DO:ked
D\225
~w
April 12, 1990 ;y ~~d ~ I; ~
:~=C.' CHINO BASIN
MUNICIPAL
"" ~ ,; `N ATE 4
° 4rn,n,:y711~, D I S T R I C T
'{r. ~anr TAm rv c unee ,,, ~~ e
City Manager *e~ecovicR •n., sea evoz
City of Rancho Cucamonga r!+o MASS MDMAN
GENEPgI MA NPGEN
Post Office Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729-0807
SnbieCt: Chino Ae sin /AWD RaaM ..H nn nn_q_, r__-..~--
Adoption oP Conservation Ordinance
This letter sarvea to transmit for your review, Resolution 90-4-1
adopted by the Chino Basin Municipal l7eter District Soard of
Directors. This Resolution recognizes that Calitornia is entering a
forth consecutive year of below normal precipitation and pro er
management of the local groundwater supply, as supplemented pby
impcrted supplies, mandates that appropriate water conservation
measures be undertaken to protect and conserve these supplies.
Resolution 90-4-i seta forth water conservation activities that can be
undertaken to accomplish these goals.
Chino Basin MWD ie urging the County, Cities and water supply agencies
wicnin its service area to adopt a conservation ordinance designed to
mitigate the effects oP the continuing drought during Calendar Year
1990. Your support in this regard is appreciated.
eIs
Office Manager
Sinc
Don ~d et
Yjb
Encl.
CONSERVE
OS
8555 ARCHIBAID AVENUE ~ Po9T OFFICE BOM 897 ~ RANCHO CUGIMONGA, CAUfORN1A 91119
DWIOM 1. IIa1M 01090! A M'MM N)IIN L ANp1~fON e)WMD A OIWD ANNI W. Dlp/lllla
h111/wM VlolrwNlnl MuN~llinwinw Am. 7RIINrII!nawa ,
RESOLUTION NO. 90-4-1
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CHINO
HASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, URGING ADOPTION OF CONSERVATION
ORDINANCES TO MITIGATE THE EFFECTS OF THE 1990
CALIFORNIA DROUGHT
WHEREAS, California is entering a forth consecutive year of below
normal precipitation; and
WHEREAS, precipitation for the current water year has been
°^_b_t_^ti,~~y *~~^~+ normal in the watersheds of the imported water
supplies serving Southern California, and many communities in cne
State will suffer water shortages; and
WHEREAS, precipitation in Southern California hoe also been
below average and many local groundwater basins are being overdrafted;
and
WHEREAS, the chino Groundwater Basin supplies a substantial
amount of the water used in West San Bernardino County but is
dependent upon supplemental supplies imported from the State Water
Project to meet all of the water demands in the "West End"; and
WHEREAS, the proper management of the local groundwater supply, as
"YY~ "Y~ wtu
conservation measures be undertaken to _protect--and conserve these
supplies; and
WHEREAS, to accomplish these goals, water conservation activities
that can be undertaken include: reduction of water use, low water use
landscape design, wastewater reclamation and reuse, development of
conjunctive use programs, and protection of the quality of groundwater
supplies.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of
chino Basin Hunicipal Water District urge all local county, cities,
and other local entities in its service area to adopt a Conservation
Ordinance designed to mitigate the effects cf the continuing drought
during calendar year 1990;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the conservation ordinance herein
solicited incorporates those conservation measures referenced above
and as necessary the local water agencies cooperatively coordinate
these ePfc-ts to maximize the beneficial utilization o! available
supplies; and
~..
a b(r
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the resolution adopted by the MWD be
incorporated herein as Exhibit "A^ to reinforce the need for all
Southern California water supply agencies to partic ipata in this
endeavor; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, tY.at a copy of this Resolution be sent to
the governing body and Chief Executive officer of the County, City,
and water supply agencies within Chino Basin Municipal water
District's Service Area.
.,....~.~.~ .....- ?rh_ _- .__'i loon.
ATTEST:
iSecretary of Chino Basin
Municipal water District and
the Board of Directors thereof
(SEAL)
Pr s fl nt Chino Basin
M~~nirj`nal t~T uiSu icc ana
the Board of Directors thereof
a~7
CITY OF RANCHO CIJCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
ORTE: April 27, 1990
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director
i
~~~~~C~. ~Jhaiucnni ron yr ntJULiJIlUNS SUPPORTING THE PASSAGE OF
PROPOSITIONS 108, 111 8 116
Per your direction, the following resolutions supporting the passage for
~~JpvS~t~Ji~ u`. c ru6SCiijcr ndii diiU ~iemt Mil' oond I1C$ Oi lY`!U,
Proposition lll,~the Traffic Congestion Relief and Spending Limitation Act of
1990, and Proposition 116, the Rafl Transportation Bond Act, are attached for
your consideration.
Information from SANBAG regarding these propositions is also attached for your
information in considering these propositions.
ty D~4elopment Director
RPR 26 '90 69(]8 Sp1aRG 714-(385-4487 tj1QP.2/7 ~~~ 9'++Ui6
The San Bemer"o County 1Yaneporietion Canmiaeiat
SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED (iOYERNMENTS
A PLANNING COUNCIL OF COOPERATING INTERACTIVE GWERNMENTB
444 North Arrowhead Avenue, 9ulte 101
San Bernardira, CalNornia 62401 (714) 884.8278
'^~"'"^ e m o FAX (714) 886.4407
Data: April 12, 1990
To: Mayors
SANBAG Representatives
City Clerks
City Managers
Arom: Wesley C. McDaniel, Executive Director
9ub3aot: A~~olution o! support !or propositions 108, 111 and 116
As you may know, SANHAG has endorsed these measures aiready. The
campaign groups for these propositions ere eeking that we seek
individual city endorsement ae well.
Would you please place this matter before your Council
.. ~,..ay~..y o N..a.~.,,., .~. o ~,.r.r...... ,. ,
covering propositions 111 nndy108,vand the County's4reaolution on
proposition 116 are attachedr which could be modified to suit
your purposes, please send a copy of your resolution oP support
of Propositions 111 and 108 to:
Me. Gillian Friedman
Yea on 111 and 100
11400 West Olympic Boulevard, Suite 278
Loa Angeles, CA 90064
Please send your Proposition 116 resolution to:
Mr. Jim Knox
Trareportetion Director
The Planning and Conservation League
909 12th Street, Suite 203
Sacramento, CA 95614
please call Mr. Czic Haley of our staff if you have questions,
CL-90-280
~~~
- ..:.. _
;1 A?R zs '90 09~ 11 SgNBAG 7 ~4-M UT[B OP TMB BOAgp CF rPERV180RB P' 4i
-- OF BAN BHRNAROINO COUNTY; CALIPORN!A
iegislatian-St+~tt March 26, 1990
FROM: BARRY 11A6KER
Caunty Supervleor, Fourth Dtatrlct
SueJlCT: PROPOSITION 116--Tha Retl 7renaportetlon Bond Ac}
RECCMMtN0ATI0N: Support PrOpea1t10n 138 beCWae 1t will prOVlde funds
for the San Bernerdlno•Las Anpelea and Sen Bernnrdlno-
Rivereida-Oranpa County rats eorrldors and other ra11
pro3acta.
BACKOROUNO: Proposition 116 on the June B, 1990 ballot, identlfted
ea the Rall Tranaportatlon Bond Aot, 1s tha Clean A1r
Tranaportstton Impprovement Aot of 1990. The Act, if
epprowd AyY Csllfornle vohra, w111 provide slmoat
33.99 b1111on statewide for pro~scta mostly bagd on
par capita nud, TM funds aN psnsrslly spaNtbd
for 11oht ra11s commuter rN1s in}eroity rNtl
ecqulH tioa of rlyht•of•waya 1acOmotlves; a rs;
equlpmenti track improvements; end other capital
improwmsnta.
A sum of SiY7 m1111on of the bond troceedl U earmarked
for two commuter rail pro~scta directly aftecttnp the
rvsidenN of San Bsrnerdlno Countyy. Thais pro,lects••ths
San Bernardlno•los Anpeiss rs11 eorrldor and Sen
Bernardlno•Rlwrsida-Oranpa County rNt eorrldor will
each pat ~9B m1111on and 419 m1111on reepeetlvely.
Ot Lhasa two elloeeNona, f61 m1111on to axpeeted to
be 'spent on those pportlans of the pro~eots which are
located 1nslda the County of San Bernardino.
Addlttonelly, 5100 m1111on w111 ba evslleble to local
apenela and Cai Trem on a competltlw basis for whale
pools and t20 m1111on to locai ageoNas for capital
outiey bleycla tonanuter pro~scta.
~ t"r __ Pe9a 1 of 2 Reaolutia~ tio. 90-110
oor gupur,3wr wallcrt Aouan ~t;IMd MMa BupervGora
~ crnxr+t Aal. (11 ~~.~~~ a Of 6UpE ~ Ii/fyy'
rA ~tos APP RC~i t~ NVOIiOR~
iw MOTION ~ ~ ~ ~~
~~ . ~ ~A 0
,. ;
lAI1L6NB~A'~~G'~ ~I~p 71~b~~. D
1
.p ; ~ A d c o ' ~ 09: St1 SRN6RG X714-~5-440' • •"~ ..... . - . P. S/7
:,~ , w ~,
•. FROM: LARRY HACKER
SUBJECT: PROPOSITION 316--The Ra11 Trnnsportatlon Rond Act
March 26, 1880
Pspa 2
If the two ra11 proJlcts are bu11t, teas anlrgy wi11
be used in transportattoni mon tramp ortattan
opCCOrtuMtlu w111 become era table to those who cannot
drlvli theta w111 b1 tus eonpestton on the overcrowded
!neweyl to and from Los Anpetaa, Rlvarslde and Oransae
County tocationei and the 0lpradation of air qu111ty
will 61 ncuced.
This bond mlaeun U campatlbte with the oehlr
transportation related proposltlons that have been
piaold on th1 Juna 6, 1900 ballot. It also provldaa
for na7locetidn of funoe to Dro~ecta -lonp tM
desiSnated corridors 'riith app:•cva ^! eeetteable
e encleai however, it provides for prohlbliiny the .
divlrnlan of tnnalt !undo to other non•nleted purpoan.
The San 8lrnardtno 9asociatlon of 6onrnminte is on
ncord a aupporHnd thU propoaltton alnce 1111 of
ISBS.
.c3 ~+
'=CC
~1
O
y,r
~
o
y
H
=
Opp
++ O
C.
C ~,
~
E .yr
°~
°
~
L
H ~
W .
_
1~.. T
O. ~
6 ~ O '0
r E c S F r .° " s ~ o E~ ?~ ~ c
9 G.Fv n .^~ v j O " C v n o0 ~ G C ,.
.,-~ c Vic. ~ it ~~d E ~ i'E
'nr"c ? on '~-- Eac
~v Ey cH ~.~s a^ ~ ~3 ~r>v° ~V o
`°4 z _ o ~ o~ `o E ~' o w E
m 3r iii oE'~~ o ~:= =&~'v °O "c
~._ F-2 ~~,Eo~ ~~, v ~,o .cis EA cc ~
c'ov-a cu?c'~c`'o" N 3°9 v•=N m~,a cyy
L E C L i W 0.M > i 'O C = i~ C~ ti >`,Q d ~..C a
G ti G _ i' 4 v .. E r/. tCi P. ~.~ 'C - ""J ~ w N. <~ 3 r
Y ~ c
V V~ "'
~E~S ~,
C
e
4
m
r
v ~
xf
O
3
J
w
q C
H ~
0
.c
ly°.
~ 3 F
EO
L
'O .•
~. ~ d
G
N ti
s
v
A
}
C
C
O m
w '~
.9
C r n ..
~~ G~ _~~' c ~ ~
C _~ Y,
L '- S '1 y ~n Ct ~
'c s c 6 ~ -
_ F'+
s`~ ~ a v y g s
a ~i'O e ~ g ~ ~: o
3 v u C # '• 3^
E E $.. ~ E ~ a ~.
~ _ z`
N o ~ c `'~-'~'v ~ oC
K Yu4" X C .'~. 'y `~. tai
'~ P.'q VCOZ g~g'~+_'.
a ~ ~ r ~ a a
F C C ~'
V O ~ ~ N
_a
C~ ~ C ~_ ~ S a.
L_ '~
a L S J .3 N •~
~~ r n tl~ Tl !6u- i s
Y- o en C i- •;
~F a ~ o ~ ~ v
`w o i n k° N~ Q
`o ~ N ai °sy. ~ .=
v. ~ p `'C Q y u
V .C 3 !° u
e'`+ 3 ~no e,
a Z e ~ S.E
,`s ~ '~', c 5 v o -' g
E°s°sQOVOG°
'.~ .L. v dy '3 pC
- Fi E ' E e
`o s^ c E e y~
. F [Oc `~ e ~ tar v a
T
A
v
i
7
ac c
.? .c
~~~
>~
a-Um
G
2
E
3
Es _
6o°cn E~
~~~_r
•r ~,
c E & . m i
~YE~3
v~y -
V~..~QO
~m~
;.ate
zc~
~
v, C ~ ~ >• r
m
C C ."i. '6 G 0. rt i y G
'J rJ. ~ a. ry C .^ ~ ~
^J - ~ a
O E
U
E
~F ~ G
E ~ ~M~ q Cj
'•C-. P y
'GJ.J L ? J
O "O'
C
i
'° j X E .
o c '> ma y' `o ~ a c a d ~ P 3 0
s
='
L
~ F=9o
oc~o
~ ~'~ c~
z
,
c_
. E
.
c _ a
i
~ ~
n.
° ~ .. ~
c~ c
o. . E
~ E
6 N '
~
,. .G i :n ~ C F- F-
~ z d~ G E; ~
3 c ~
~ v
c G r. r
.
c o' ~- o _ c ,. r r c : ~ 3 0
r
v ,
= ~
y
p °'
~°
~
c E
E J
J] _-. ~ ~
A. F
y ] ~ _ G + C
E E '. y ~ ~ o° c
cs .. .: r_'.. 4 ~ ~E
'-'
a~._ y
' ,s c v a y ~ .a 3 ~ E m
' o
T
~' t0
V .~ ~~ ti
N : c r C~ ~
E ~
j
G C O V _ - .
..
'n Q~ F 7
O L O S OO V ~ O C 'O
.X C
C {I7 L '
E ~ ~ 'd .~ O
C
ti G
v%
t ~ y r ~ ~ 9 G C C rv .
G
,m=~ r ~ GE Swi q.n ?_ E v, ~w u ~» G
v a :
~- p z > _ ~
~ o _
s G
C F~ C O • ti G 2 .~ F fi '( il~ ~i W H
m~~° x 3
~n
.V"j ,j ~ 4i 7C
°
~ ~
O
'~ G H
L u rl
~
` ;' ~ b C ~E y~= 3 y Q ~ y N 1 -
M ~'
~
~
.-L~a G'... "^~J j.~F?J_ 'JO OOY~ Vp I~ ~~'0q
'
N
»
C o o a d O v ~i '• ~ ~ Q om' y F .h ~ v O
v
i
~. °' v i
61 :.'C'E=a>, W'i~o=eo o.': voc
E
' ~v'-c. o a'~a`c` ~i
~ E33z c ti:a m~' ~"
~ "'> ~
'~ o v 4 ~ o o yy~~ ~ V,,CCV C~ yy
F
C
O ?
'_ &' c
t
- y 00'~ ~.~ "
c " c~~ O
~ v F
5 0 L
°
~
~ u d
v _ ~ ° c c ~
p
p
~_ p~ y
~i WG
~
O~ q ~ N
O CG
.%
~ L ~ 5
~ m
N v_i ^
M
~"'
~
F"i G ~~ G H T
C O C O~ S~ y
~S 1
E O
N
n^
'
o
K o pp C C C
~ a ~.
~ m A
0.
~ ~ ~ ~ 7
Y
$ ~
°
g ~
o
o £
s E
c m ~
~ .y
.~ .8 .~
G ?
A .Z o
^ ' `
a a ' ~
' w
E x ~ m°
oo b
a
.c $
.
.
U
c o
~
1° b
° A o
'
~
"'
' v $
. .
~
.
oE
c
°c: v::~C
.
H
G :C
C
y A
~ G
c^^ c
L ~J'
v o0
r ry
.F ~i C~ 0 y~ G
Q
~ '
0 "
L y
.{ 0 0 b N~ ~ ,
~ ~~ j m q 't ...
~ NpNp q n C ~
~
O'
0.9 G 0
v G
~~ 4~
G v E' v m
m O G N N q .~
N 9
~
.
'y
N
p ~ ~ `]
~ 3 L
L OD ''.. 9
' v
U C T
N MM
N
.p G.
O
O F q p C __ G.
0 0
, E A in L
~ • v Fc
F m Z e
O~ d G 0.L ~a GLr
RESOLUTION N0. O ~ ~ -!
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCRMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING PROPOS iT ION 116, THE RAIL
TRRNSPORTRTI ON BONG ACT.
WHEREAS, Proposition 116, the Rail Transportation Bond Act, would
provide $1.99 billion to improve and expand intercity, commuter and li oht rail
~. auoi2 vin ou yiw u, ~ai~rorm a; ana
WHEREAS, Proposition 116 is compatible and consistent with the other
transportation measures on the ,tune 5, 1990 ballot, and thereby will result in
implementation of part of an overall transportation plan which will provide
better transportation and cleaner air for all Californians; and
WHEREAS, Proposition 116 provides that $98 million shall be allocated
for the San Bernardino-Los Angeles rail corridor For expenditure for commuter
rail; and
WHEREAS, Proposition 116 provides that $79 million shall be allocated
for the San Bernardino-Riverside-Orange County rail corridor for expenditure
for ca^nu ter rail;
WHEREAS, Proposition 116 provides that $20 million shall be altoca ted
w vr0 u'ra~.. .:f .., oti ti ,,. ra elq M lnrat anri ec R:r .ai mrri~~
Fnr uhiryrle imnrnvNmonim^nrnior tc ^whirh imnrnyn cafc_t_y anA rpnvc nionro Fnr
bicycle commuters;
WHEREAS, Proposition 116 provides that $100 million shall be
allocated to fund a competitive program for the acquisition of specified
t~nmuter and intercity rail car and locomotive without the requirement of any
matching funds;
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga believes
that rail transportation results in less energy use, more transportation
opportunities for those who cannot drive, less congestion on already
overcrowded streets and highways, and cleaner air; and
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
herabv rE iJiVe the SJGau PL i,f Lhe na Ica ne of ern nn citinn iin nn the .iune G
1990 ballot.
~r~{
RESOLUTION N0. "/~' ~ ~~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 111, THE
TRAFFIC CONGESTION RELIEF AND SPENDING LIMITATION ACT OF
1990 AND PROPOSITION 108, THE PASSENGER RAIL AND CLEAN AIR
BOND ACT OF 1990.
nn EHLHJ, the state of California faces monumental challenges--meeting
dramatically increased !aw enforcement and public safety needs, addressing
spiraling health care costs, co pi no with unprecedented population growth,
managing traffic congestion and teaching our children the skills necessary to
compete in the modern workforce, and
WHEREAS, Proposition 111 would alter the gover ninent spending limit Lo
allow state and local governments greater flexibility in making use of already
collected tax dollars generated by California's strong economy to address
these needs; and
WHEREAS, it would allow the state to increase user fees -- a 5-cent
per-gallon fuel tax increase Lhis year and an additional 1 cent for each of
the next four years to provide increased funding for maintenance and
impro vemenL of highway and Lra nsit projects without reducing funds for other
tri ti cal programs; and
WHEREAS. hasi r. fundi nn mra re ntcec nrnvided to nn hlir crhnnlc nn •ho
November 1988 ballot are retained; and
WHEREAS, without a change in the government spending limit, it will
be impossible to maintain the generally high level of education,
transportation, health services, law enforcement, senior programs and other
vital services to the residents of California; and
WHEREAS, Propositions 111 and 108 are supported by a broad coalition
including League of California Cities, County Supervisors Association of
California, California Association of Highway Pa trnl men, California Taxpayers
Association, League of Women Voters of California, California Chamber of
Commerce, RARP (American Association of Retired Pers mrs ), State Leyi slative
Committee, California Teachers Association, California Association of
Hospitals and Health Systems, California Police Chiefs Association, California
$td tli AUtGdiebiie As ii,i Teti un, Caiifnrnia i,npnrii of Pniira and Churiffa
California School Boards Association, California Senior Legislature,
California Transit Association, Californians for Higher Education,
Californians for Better Transportation, State Building and Construction Trades
Council of California,~and many others; and
WHEREAS, reduction in the state's traffic congestion will require
substantial investments in alternative methods of transportation in the
expansion and construction of transit facilities. The June 1990 ballot also
contains a E1 billion general obligation bond for urban, conmtu ter and
ass
Resolution No.
intercity rail projects -- including BART, M,etroRail in Los Angeles and urban
light rail to address this need.
NOW, THEREfBRE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby resolve the support of the passage of Proposition 111, the Traffic
Relief and Spending Lirtii tation Act of 1990 and Proposition IoB, the Passenger
Rail and Clean Air amid Act of i990 on the June b, i95o ballot.
~~~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 2, 1990 '
T0: Member f jhe City Council A,,,,'
FROM: Dennis ut and Chuck Bu~!ver, Co ~nc;l cobco,.,~;ttee cn Et iwa nda
North
SUBJECT: ETIWANDA NORTN ANNEXATION AND SPECIFIC PLAN STRATEGY - REPORT OF
THE SUBCOMMITTEE
R ECOHMENDATION
Affirm direr Lion of the Subcommittee directing staff to take a strong
position in support of the City's General Plan and development standards
in the Etiwanda North area. Also, direct staff to work with the County to
achieve planning results which will mutually benefit the County and the
City. Further, direct staff to continue actions leading Lo annexation of
the Etiwa nda North area. Finally, affirm Subcommittee communication of
April 6, 1990, to the Conso rtiunl as follows:
The City will not annex territory which has processed tract maps
through the County.
ThP. ri tv will lit: e~.. !~ lx.. -- -~~~~~ yvm iuia w en r0 rCe Lne
City's General Plan and City standards.
The City will not participate in infrastructure finance plans for
development in the County.
BACKGROURO
Since December 1988 City staff has been negotiating to annex approximately
5,600 acres of territory generally located north of 24th Street and east
of the extension of Milliken Avenue.
On November 15, 1999, the City Council discussed the City's intention to
annex the Etiwa nda North area. On November 29, 1989, the City Council
passed Resolution 89-6fi8, requesting the support of the San Bernardino
~neniy Board cf 5Jp2r''v i53 rs Peintlva to i_ity ar!i~r `+ tv unnax the Etiwa nda
North Sphere-of-Influence area. The BOS received and filed the Resolution
without comment.
On February 1, 1990, the City Cnuncil asked Mayor Stout and Councilman
Buquet to serve on a Council Subcommittee on Etiwanda North Annexation
Strategy.
MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL
ETIWANDA NORTH ANNE%ATION AND 57ECIFIC PLAN STRATEGY
May 2, 1990
Page 2
On February 27, 1990, the Subcommittee met with staff to discuss the
Specific Plan and annexation strategy.
On April 6, 1990, the Subcommittee met with Supervisor Jon Mikels to
discuss po tentiai future uses of County Flood Control District property in
the Etiwanda North area. Supervisor Mikels expressed support for planning
in Lhe Sphere area which will mutually benefit the County and the City.
S••b scqucot'.y Ap- 19, ,990, ity 7lann utg Staff, County -r is nning
Staff, and County Flood Control District staff met to discuss the future
nc~= of r„„„to flood Control District (CFCD) DroDer Ly. CFCD staff
indicated that when CFCD property becomes surplus, they will seek
development consistent with the City'S General Plan designs do r,s and with
surrounding development. At this time CFCD is reviewing their property in
the City's Sphere-o f-Influence to determine when and how much will become
surplus property. (Also, CFCD is preparing a feasibility study for
=-: clcp-c ~- ~ D p~~r=~t.r >ouih ur ueer Creex oebrfs basin and north of
Haven Avenues This property is west of the Etiwanda North area.)
In the meantime, at the monthly meeting of the Consortium of Landowners
held on April 4, 1990, a consensus vote was taken to process applications
in the County. The Consortium's stated reason was that processing in the
City was stalled. On April 24, 1990, Joe Dilorio submitted a revised plan
of development for the University/Crest project to t',,e rounty, thereby
reactivating the County aoplica Lion.
ANALYSIS/DISCUSSION
Toe Ci,.y's yoai muse oe to ac m eve aevelopment to the Sphere-o f-influence
which is consiste r.t with the City's General Plan and with City standards.
Annexation of territory is Lhe most direct means to retain control of the
planning process. Therefore, efforts to annex territory should be
diligently pursued. Toward that goal the City Council can adopt
Re solu ticns of Intent to Annex at the May lfi, ]990, City Council Mee *_ing.
Pre-zoning is required prior to annexation. The Etiwanda North Specific
Plan would provide pre-zoning. The most comprehensive approach to
development in the Sphere to rrito ry can be achieved by staff's revision of
the Etiwanda North Specific Plan to bring it into consistency with City
standards.
The Specific Plan EIR is nearly complete and expected to begin a 43-day
review period about June 15, 1990. The critical oath for the EIR is
..O,";p l2tioli vi uia bi ty'$ GfaVl ly MVd CI Tra fflC ~tUdy.
Finally, it is obvious that to achieve the City's planning goals,
City/County cooperation is requf red. Therefore, the City must continue to
work with the County to he sure that development which occurs will
mutually benefit the City and the County.
~'$
MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL
ET INANUA NORTH luNNEXATION AND SPECIFIC PLAN STRATEGY
May 2, 1990
Page 3
CONCLUSION
By minute action the Council should affirm the annexation strategy
guidelines developed by the Scbcomnittee as follows:
- Affirm the message given to Etiwa nda North landowners and developers:
* The City wilt not annex territory which has processed tract maps
±hrouah the Count v.
* The City will litigate to the maximum extent possible to enforce
the City's General Plan and City standards.
...- .a .,, n... n... ym ...e .y.. ~. ... ,..,. _--...--_.- ....~..,... r.-..- .r.
development in the County.
- Direct staff to continue to work with the County to ensure that
development which occurs is mutually beneficial to the City and the
County.
- Direct staff to bring separate Resolutions of Intent to Annex sphere
territory and to Annex the Eti wa nda North area to the May 16, 1990,
City Council Meeting.
- Direct staff to revise the Etiwanda North Specific Plan to conform to
City standards in preparation for adoption as pre-zoning of the
C.4..._ a
-,...~.. .~.. .:.-. J.
- Direct staff Lo complete and circulate the draft EIR for the Etiwanda
North Specific Plan.
DSJCB:gs
~i9
?k~Y - :'_ !~a] ,t4 :?CM1 Cf+P~ry rOh~Fw,P -0 -' c'~-
RTINANDA NORTH LANDOMNERS CONSORTIUM
as The Caryn Company
Rxi Offlce Box 216.80. (~gane. G 926<-"i-02i6
otfxe (Ira) aas-s~ rat [<u) a99st rs
may z,ISSo
City- Council Memners
City of Rancho Cucamonga
?. 0. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729
Re: Etiwanda North St. stagy
Deer Gentle People:
The following is the response of the Etiwanda North Landowners Consortium to the City
Council's Subcommittee report on the Etiwanda North annexation.
The Consortium wishes to remain cooperative with the City's efforts while developing
our properties with the rights given to us by the County's Generai Plen. It is our desire
to produce a community that sets the highest overall standards for design, social and
fiscal responsibility to the community.
In that light, we suggest that in considering the Subcommittee's report the following items
be brought forth:
1. It may not be In the City's best interests to refuse to annex properties in the
Tuture.
2. It probably would be non-productive to litigate to enforce a set of standards
that may be intunally inconsistent, out [t should ba vary productive for the City and
County Sts!! to work cooperatively on the development of Etiwanda North. Annexa-
tion must t:o a cooperative effort to be successful, now or in the future.
h'e again nfter to cooperate ir: satisfying goals of the City and the County while respecting
the landowners' rights, we suggest that a review by the Subcommitte Jointly with Staff and
Consortium representatives be held so that the various issues may be addressed in the proper
form.
i'nenk you for your wiiiingneaa to itlke iatu tlccOiri,i tnd faalJ:~a of t.ie paopla mbbt atf22tad
by your actions.
Yours truly,,//~//(1 r~
c3~~'G Ca " ••~
~ ph N. DHOrio, for the
Etiwanda North Landowners Confortfum
JND/Jas
ETl-YANDA NOATfi LANDOWNERS CONSORTIDM
Ito The Ceryn Company
LL~st O/Ixxclbx 2f6. ~. Dune. G 98677-0216
Of9ce (<14) 499-5929 Fi1X (714) 499-5t73
May 2, 1990
M1ir. Brad Buller, City Planner
City of P.anc.`.o Cucamo.~a
P. O. Box 807
......~~C CC„C.._ .o_, re1.Y _...._ n..__
Re: E:iwenda North Specific Plan/EIR Processing Status
Dear Brad:
Thank you for your letter oC April 20 and our subsequent conversation. I think we agree there
has been a lack of communication between the Consortium and the City regerdltg objectives.
Ropefully es the process continues between the City, County end Consortium, the objectives
will become more clear and compatible.
You indicated inconsistencies e~dat between the Specific Plan, the EIR end Tract Maps and the
City's General Plan and Development Code. [ am aware of very few meaningfW inconsistencies
and those seem to be caused by conflicts between the City's various standards end dr~ires. You
feel "these inconsistencies indicate that under the densities prapoaad by the Consortium; City
standards cannot be met". [suggest the standards can't ba "met" and still be consistent with
the City's General Plan. Further, li has been understood Dy the Consortium throughout the
process that the Ctty woWd agree that the lnndownar9 should have the same development rtghU
!~~ .6e filly n> ,Ley wouiu iu ti,e i.vunty. iuis in no way anvute ce meant to mawate a qualttauve
loweri:~g of standards. Anther, a respecLf W interpretstion of the City$ standards (some may be
inconsisteni with others or with the County's) is one of the objectives of the Specific Plen N our
effort to produce a project that setr the highest design, social end financial standards ever"
achieved in the City.
Regarding the EiR, my comments remain the some e' before: It's an exheuative end tomplete
work to date; the continuing effort is aimed more nt implomentation and refinement of the miti-
gation measures, etW; the most Important question is the amount of the Flood Control District's
properties that should be preserved as Open Space.
I woWd be happy to discuss this work or any other related items as you dlait'e. 7'henks for your
help in the communication.
Yours)t~rWY,
../(~/
Joseph N. Dliorio, for the
Etfwandt North Landowners Coroortium
JND/jaa
cc: Supervisor Jon D. Mikels
Mr. Jack Lam
Mr. flick Gomez
Mr. JoM McMeines
MemDero of the Consortium
City Council Members
ETIWANAA NORTH LANDOWNERS CONSORTIUM
cie Tl7e Cafyn Company
Lb6t Ofrce Box 216.60. Cggvne. C4 92Gi i-0216
OfF•ce ~14) 499-5929 i'iLY (714) 4~-51 <'3
May 1, 1990
supervisor Jon U. mikels
County of San Bernardino
8303 Haven Avenue
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Re: Etiwandfl North specific Plan -Differences Between City and
the Etiwanda North Landowners Consortium
Dear Supervisor Mikels:
To respond to Bcad Bidier's letter of April 20 on this matter:
CITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
A. The City states the "Consortium has reduced for sizes far below City standards..:'.
The Corsortium reduced lot sizes once to obey Str1f's directive to move the sidewa!4s five
feet in from [he curb- Densities remain the same and are reflective of the densities allowed
in the County's General Plan.
B. The Consortium believes that the agreement between the City and the Consortium •.v as
and is that the landowners, by agreeing [o annexation into the City, would not suffer eco-
nomically and that they would receive the same density in the City that they are allowed
in the County. That avera[e density is 1.5 dwelling units per acre, si~uilar to the Etiwande
North Specific Plan (ENSP) and the lowest density anywhere in the City. ultimately, pro-
during a specific plan is a matter of balancing different and sometimes conflicting standards
end requirements. The test is always one of reasonable compllence and further discussions
between the City and the Consortium might help define a reasonable balance between
standards.
U. CDtC0LAT10N
A. Aa opposed to the City's inference that the Consortium hss neither studied or offered
to support offsite mitigation end regional transportation needs, the Consortium has always
hear. on record that it would volunteri),y pay the cquivatent of the City's Systems Develop-
ment Fee and its fair share of any ef[aite mitigation and regional uanaportation costa.
B. The City's "gravity" traffic model is not on schedule as the City msintaitro -it's a
year overdue. it's initial output matches quite cleoely with the two eerller traffic models
for the ENSP, es troN the eoroortium and the City's consultants maintain to be the case
before the Consortium was charged 580,000 to rerun its traffic models s third time using
the gravity model. Tho Specific Plan re[lecU the Circulation Element of the Cowty's
General Plan and has the abillty to reflect certain parts of the City's Ganerel Plan.. The
conceptual issue here tends to be whether or not one or more roads ought to erou Day
Creek wash. Other issues Send to be technical implementation quostlorm. As the City
evolves their traffic model, we will be happy to diacuas the matter with them.
Supervisor Jon D. Mikek
ENSP -Difference $eaween City and the Consortium
Mey 1, 1990 Page Two
lll. PAGES
There seems to be some confusion within City Staff itself on the issue of City parks.
Overriding any conflicting Staff opinions is the fact that Etiwanda North will provide
seven acres of perks per 1,000 population as opposed to the City's enforceable require-
ment of three acres.
lei inGLLV 1tVVJ eiainr~.irv niny Tnn MaD
Brad states the Council has directed Staff to observe a 1.8 percent limit. Council has
also acknowledged in public meetings that ~,ey would accept a tax rate of two percent
it the additional .2 percent were charged by schools or other non-City entities. The
consortium would like to see necessary services paid for mrd maintain me is percent
cap, but to do this, the City must also cooperate. To date, the City has mvMated a
Landscape Maintenance District that charges up to flue to 50 limes what any other
district in the City charges, and forced a Fire District CFD that will generate a surplus
o[ more than one miLion dollars per year to the District. The Consortium agreed eo
accept a Police CFA with the understanding that ell new development throughout the
City would De charged for the services. Instead, only Etiwanda North is being charged.
The financial impact reports that have been done by the City and the Consortium indi-
cate that using "generally acceptable" accounting procedures, Etiwanda North could
generate a suDStantial surplus to the City per year after payirµt its felt shoe of normal
City level services. The City eculd use thst surplus to reduce the Etiwanda North tax
rate.
PBASWG PLAN
As opposed to the City's statement that it requested a phasing plan end that the Consortium
does not yet have a draft of such a plan, such a phasing "backbone" plan was submitted Yo
the City in June, 1989. Several upd..ted versions of the purl are available for review.
vl. RESOL'RCH MANAGBMHNT PLAN
Again differing with the City, a Resource dtansgement Plan does not have to be and cannot
be ratified Dy all affected agencies and entities before the 8pecifie Plan [s approved, It
should siao be remembered that the Resource Management Plan Ls not nttrlbutabl¢ sot¢Ig
to the ENSP although the Consortium is happy to work cooperatively in the very worth-
while effort.
YU. GRADINQ
The Clty is correct that tho Coroortfum participated 1n the proctla of adoption of fire
HIILaIde Development Ordinance. UntoMUtwtely, evidence tndtcatea tMt the grading
atsndards oonfllet with certain Clty engineering requirements and probablir wlA not work
on msny properties without a sizeable imbalance of earth work sad offslta gradits;. As
the City b using the grading ordinance as an example of resolution at differences, then
hopefully we can dfacuss resolution of dif[erencea In the implementation teaalDlUty of
the ordinance.
.~~
Supervisor Jon D. Mikeis
ENSP - AiPFerenee Between City and the Consortium
May 1, 1990 Page Three
VIII. TENTATSYB MAP PROCESSING
City maintains that it unilaterally terminated its agreement to process Tentative Maps
because the February version of the Specific Plan contained development standards that
were "tar out of line". The Consortium made no significant changes in the February very
Sion, and the City has yet to specify what standards ere "so far out of line". The Consortium
i~eiieves that the TPnt/.rrv~ ms..e . ~.~w..~_l.ew !~ ?:~.~ •~ •-__ - - -
ment Standards irres etiva ofean ~discussions of the " ~~ ~ ~.~ ~,~~ ~ i~•~l~
pe y 5pecttic Flan standaras.
IX. COUNTY PLOOD CONTROL DISPRICT PROPERTY
Tho Consortium is heopv to see the City he¢In to participate in the discussions WitR the
Flood Control Diatrfct. As shouid be well known by now, the Flood Control District must
be satisfied with the tlisposition of iW- properties it the annexation of the entire Specific
Plan area is to occur.
CONCLUSION
1 understand it's your desire to have a meetitgq so that the Cfty, County and Consortium can dis-
cuss openly end productively th¢ resolution of ditterenca., to prwiuc¢ the best plan and tRe best
community for the area. We look forward greatly to such a meeting.
Yours truly~,n/ ~ (/_j~
~i~_/~_1Y_A_~
oseph N. Di[orio, for the
Etiwsnde North Landowners Cotuortfum
JND/jas
cc: City Cow:ril Dlembers, City of Rancho Cucamonga
Mr. Jack Lam
Mr. Brad Bullar
Mr. Jetty Pulwood
Mr. Ridt Gomezu
Mr. Runt Maguire
Mr. Joe Sehultz
32:!
.'.
,. __.. P. n0.