The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1991/09/04 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETlNG51 let and 3rd Wednesdttiye - 7:00 p.m. September 4, 1991 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 •~ City Coewcilmembers Dennis L. Stout, Mayor William J. Alezmder, Coancilmember Charles J. Buquet, Coascilmember Diane Williams. Councilmember Pamela J. Wright, Couacilmember ar Jack Lam, Ctty Manager James L Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, Clly Clerk City Office: 989.1861 - City Comcil Agenda 8aptecber 4, 1991 1 All iron aubcitlad toe the CiLp Council Agaada wet M in rriting. The deadline for suhcl!liag chap itga L 5:00 p.c. oa the Wednesday prior to the coating. The City Clerk's of [lee rweivea all suck Stun. A• GLL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: euquei _, Alexander _, Stout _, Will Same _, and Wright _. B• ANNODlICARNTB/PR68RffATI0N6 1. Presentation of a Proclamation recognizing September 12, 1991 ae DARE Day. C. COMNUNI GTIONS PItON THB PDBLIC Thin L the tiwe and place for the general public to addnas the City Comc11. stab Lw prohibits the Citp Council feu addreadng soy issue soC previously SneludW oa the Agenda. Ths Citp Council up receive Lestiway and eat the cattar for a subaequeat aeatiag. Coueots era to be licitsd to five wlautss per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar !teas are expected to be routine end non-controveraisl. They will ba acted upon by the Council at ono tics without diacuaaion. Any Stec up be revved by a Couacilawcber or cacbar of the eudisaee for discusaioa. 1. Approval of Minutes: August 21, 1991 2. Approval of Warrants, Register Noe. e/14/91r 8/21/91 and ] 8/2&/91, and Payroll ending 8/15/91 for the total amount of $2,462,915.72. 3. Approval to designate 1983 Chevrolet Malibu and 1985 15 Pord Crown Victoria ae surplua for auction. 4. Approval of payment of the City'a portion for ~6 professional services for the fines and forfeitures lawsuit in the amount of $1,740.00 to be paid out of account number 01-4285-6028. - ~-fit Cite Council Agaada eepta~ber 4, 1991 P 2 5. Approval to file a claim with SANSAG for Local 17 ~ Trenaportation Pund Article 3 reimburemnent foz Archibald Avenue Sidewalk Phaee iI improvamBntA and the Tryon Street Sidewalk improvements. 6. Approval to award and execute the Heritnge Park 22 eellfield Improvement Project contract (CO 91-060) to Marina construction Company of Irvine in the amount of $120,733 plus a l0i contingency of $12,073, for a total of $132,806 from the Park Development Fund No. 7n-em i9 _alnn 7. Approval to execute Real Property Improvement Contract 24 and Lien Agreement for CUP 91-13, located on 9567 8th Street, eubmitted by Walter J. Neff and Stevan E. MaAan. RESOLUTION NO. 91-249 25 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO COCRNONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCBPTING A RBAL PROPERTY INPROVEHENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM WALTER J. NEPP AND STEVEN 8. MAF311N AND AUTHORIZING THE HAYOA AND CITY CLEAR TO SIGN THE SAMB 8. Approval of map, execution of Improvement Agreement, 27 Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting HaLntenance District NUB. 1 and 2 for TYact 14866, located at the eoutheaet corner of Lemon Avenue and London Avenue, submitted by the Penrhill Company. REEOLUTION NO. 91-250 28 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IHPAOVRMENT AGAEBMENT AND IHPROVE103NT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TPACT N0. 14866 RESOLUTION NU. 91-251 29 A RESOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THB ANNEXATION OP CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 14866 . ,.- City Couaeil Agaada baptanbsr 4, 1991 3 9. Approval to sxOCUte Improvement Agreement, Improvement 32 ~ Security end Ordering the Annexation to Landactps Haintensnce District No. 1 and Street Lighting Malntenance District Noa. 1 and 2 for CUP 88-28, located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Malachite Avenue, submitted by Forrest Perry. RESOLUTION NO. 91-252 3Q A RBSOLUTION OP TH8 CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AOReEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT 66CUAITY POR CUP BS-28 RESOLUTION NO. 91-253 35 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, OADBAING THB ANNE%ATION OP CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N. 3 AND STREBT LIGHTING MAINTHNANCS DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR CUP BB-2a 10. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement 38 Security and Ordering the Annexation to Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 4 for Church Street located between Elm Avenue - we at and Elm Avenue submitted 6y Lewis Homes of California. RESOLUTION NO. 91-254 QD A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF TFE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGRBEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CHURCH STASET RESOLUTION NO. 91-255 ai A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNE%ATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHTING HAINT&NANC6 DISTkICT NCS. 1 AND 6 POA CHURCH BTREET 11. Approval to accept improvements, release of bonds and qq file a notice of completion for OR 87-34 located on the west aide of Archibald Avenue south of Baee Lina Road. ~,- C1LX CCwCil Agwde ~;~ Beptenber t, 1991 ~~'~! 4 ' RESOLUTION NO. 91-256 4$ A RESOLUTION OF THS CITX COUNCIL OF THB CITY OP A71NCH0 CUCANONCA, WU.IPORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IHPROVSHENTS POR DR 87-3d AND AUTHORIZINC THE PILING OF A NOTICH of COMPLETION FOA TH8 WORE 12. Approval to accept improvements, release of bonds and 46 Yile a notice of edapletlon for Percal Map 13125 located on the aouthweet corner of mr.n.-.-~ Cam, va: sna enter ...mwn. RESOLUTION NO. 91-257 4~ A R830LUTION OP THH CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF FANCNO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOA PARCEL IH+ 13325 AND AUTHOAIEINC THE FILING OP A NOTICH OP COMPLETION POR THE NOAK 13. Approval to accept the Rochester Avenue Parkway 48 beautification PrOjeet (CO 90-050) ae complete, release the bonds and authorize the City HngineeY to file a notice of completion. RESOLUTION NO. 91-258 49 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IHPROVEHENTS FOR ROCHESTER AVENUE PARI(WAY BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT (CO 90-050) AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OP COMPLETION FOR THE WORE 14. Approval to vacate a sidewalk easement located between 5D 9415 and 9425 Palo Alto Street, aC the terminus of Layton Street, and setting the date of public hearing for October 2, 1991. AESOLVTION NO. 91-259 $'( A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING IT INTENTION To VACATE A SIDEWALK SASEHENT LOCATED BETWEEN 9415 AND 9425 PALO ALTO STR88T, AT THS TEAHI2R7S OP LAYTON STREET ~r - City council Agenda BepteNber 6, 1991 S 15. Approval to vacate a recorded Offer of Dedloaklon for a 56 portion of Hlgnonette Street, setting the date of public hearing for October 2, 1993, end relenee of a Aeal Property Improvement Contract end Lien Agreement for 4260 Mignonette Street. RE9OLUTION NO. 91-260 58 A RESOLUTION OF TFffi CITY COUNCIL OF THS CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONGA, COUNTY OP 6AN BHIDiARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATH A AECOADBD OPPER Ol D@DICATION POR A PORTION OF HIGNONETT6 STR88T FRON HELLNAN AVBNUB M69TEALY INCLUD INC THH PARTIAL CUL-OB-SAC - APN 202-041-57 AND 58 RESOLUTION NO. 91-261 6z A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH8 CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OP CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREBHENT FOR 9260 MIGNONBTTE STREET PROM MONA F. AND STEPHEN L. BUTTERS AND RUTH V. AND AEANARD C. DAVGHEATY B. CONSENT ORDINANCES The followia9 Ordinaatea Lava Lad public hearinga at the tLe of first raFding. Second readiaga are axpecled to be xnutiae and non-centrovsraial. Thep will ba acted upon by the Council at one tiNa without diacuaaion. The Citp clerk will read the title. Anp itee can be raroved for discussion. No items submitted. F. ADVBRTI86D PUBLIC NRARINOS The fel lowing iteea have boon adva rtiaed and/or poatsd u public hearinga a• required by law. The Cbair will open the Nesting to receive public testiax+ep. 1. NSI O F O G V C ON O POA ON (4 90 N N D V SIERM HADRB AVENUES (Continued froN August 23, 1991) STAFF RSQVEeTB CONTINVANCB TO OCTOBER 2, 1991. ' City Council Agenda Eeptgber 4, 1991 6 z. 65 ORD3NANC6 NO. 311-A )flret reading) ]0 AN OADINAHCE OF TFig CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY OP AANCMO CUCAl10NGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.24 BLBCTRICAL CODE, OF THE RANCHO CUCANONGA MUNICIPAL CODE) AND ADOPTING BY ASPBRENCS THB NATIONAL BLECTRICAL CODE, 1990 EDITION( WITH CERTAIN AIOINOMENTS, ADDITIONS, DaLATiuaiS w+u EXCEPTIONS TO SAID CODE O. PUELIC HEIIRIN08 The following itga have Ao legal publieatioa or poatiag requiregate. The chair will epee the getiug to reosAe public Leatironp. 1. TRAILS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - A canpreheneive ]$ implementation strategy for hiking, riding, and biking trails within the community. RESOLUTION NO. 91-262 $6 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THS TRAILS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN E. CITY NANAOER'S eTAFF REPORTS Tha following itga do aoL legally require any public teatieooy, although the Chair up opeu the seating for public input. 1. CONSIDERATION OF FORNAi. RESPONSH TO ROUTE 30 E%TENSION $] ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT/ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIR/RIB) - To consider comments by at aff, the Hi atcr is Preservation, Planning, and public Safety Conwiaeione concerning the Draft 6IR/E IS for the Route 30 Freeway Extension and authorising the Hayor to forward eaa(e to the California Department of Transportation. 2. INITIAL EVALUATION OP THE PIir?'T CURBB IDE RECYCLING 114 PROGRAM '-^' City Counoll Agenda Ecptrbcr {, 1991 7 3. ~N dNQ RECOMMHNDATION OF WBET %ND lQMBER 1'O 6ERV8 ON 124 S,~VIy`8 AUTHORITY I. COUNCIL BUAIN688 The follering itos hs•c hcca scquptcd by !bc City Council for diacucdoa. Thep are not public 6nriag itus, clthougb the Chair Nay open the accting for public input. 1. 86POAT ON FVND ING_ALTEANATIV85_PUA PHONES IN_PARRA 134 2. REPORT ON PROPOSBD 6HCOND PHASE FOR R%SOLUTION OF DAY LABORER ISSUES 135 J. 2DENTIFICATION OF ITG16 FOR NETT MEETING This is Lbc tiac for City Comeil !o identify the itp• they rich to di•cusc at the nc:t Ywting. Thcac itea• rill not br diecuseW at ibis acting, only idcntiticd for thr nest acting. R. COMMVNICATIONS FROM TBE PUHLIC This i• thr tiaa and plrcc for the general public to cddroo the city Comcil. 6Lats lar prohibits the City Council trod addreuiag sap iuuc ao! previously imludW oa the Agenda. Thw city council map z•eeive teetieoay and Ht the setter for • subsequent acting. Co~ucnta ara to 6c licited to five sinute• par Lndividual. L. ADJOURNI@NT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO 6ZRCUTIV6 eESSION TO DINCU88 CONTRACT NBOOTIATIONB. I, Debra J. Aflame, City Clerk of the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Auquat 30, 1991, eeventy-tro (72) hourD prior to the meeting per Government coda 54953 at 10500 Civic Canter Drive. AugueG 21, 1991 CITY OP RANCHO CUCAHONGA CITY COUNCIL NINUTBS R~gulaY Meetinc A. nRi.T. '1'(1 neaRll A regular meeting of the City Council of Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga waB hold on Wednesday, August 21, 1991, in Che Council chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. 6tout. Present were CouncilmemDares William J. Alexander, Chnrlee J, august II, Diane Williams, Pamela J. Wright, end Mayor DenniB L. Stout. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Madman, City Attorneyt Jerry e. Fulwaod, Deputy City Manager; Aick Gomez, community Development Director; Olen Jonas, Sr. RDA Analyst; erad sailer, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Scott Murphyr Associate Planner; Joe O'Neil, City engineer; Nike Olivier, SY. Civil engineer) Susan Neely, Pinence Officer; Tony Flores, Management Analyst I; Ingrid Nlair, 423 Supervisor; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; Joe Schultz, Community Services Director; Duane Baker, Resistant to the City Manager; Diane O•Neal, Management Analyst IIj Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael and Alex Ahumada, Administrative Services Ofticer, Anncho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clerk. a ~ • x R B. ANNOUNC0~Pr3/PRH9BNTATIONS No announcements or Presentations were made. , a x . ~ C. CWANNI GTIONS IRON TBB PUBLIC No communications were made by the public. < ~ . . . . D1. Approval of Warrant e, Register Noe. 7/31/91 (PY 90/91), 7/31/91 (PY 91/92), B/7/91 (PY 90/91), and S/7 /91 (PY 91/92); and Payroll ending 8/1/91 for the total amount of $1x2&7,682.36. City Council Minute August 21, 1991 ?age 2 D2. Approval to receive and file currant Investment Schedule as of July 31, 1991. D3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for otf Sale General for Lucky Store f679, Lucky Stores, Incorporated (A Delaware Corporation), 6351 Haven Avenue. D4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Snle Hear G Wine Bating Place for The Deli, Jerry N. and Rosemary Owen, 9671 Foothill Boulevard. 05. Approval to authorize the advertising of the ^Notice Inviting Bids' for the Sierra Madre Avenue Street Improvement Project, located from Arrow Route io Ninth Street, to he funded from Community Block Grant Fund, Account No. 28-4333-8951. RESOLUTION NO. 91-229 A RHSOLUTION OF THH CITY COUNCIL OF THH CITY OP RANCHO CVCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPHCI FICATI0N6 POR THH "SIHRIU NADAS AVHNVH STRBHT IMPROVBNSNT PAOJBCT", IN SAID CITY ANO AUTHORIZING AND DIRHCTINC THB CITY CLBAA TO ADVHATISB TO RECE IVB BIDS D6. Approval of disposition of Fiscal Year 3987/88 Caryn Landscape Maintenance District Punde. D7. Approval to adopt Fiscal Year 1991/92 Landscape, Lighting and Special Assessment District Budgets. RESOLUTION NO. 91-23U A AE SOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THS CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THS CITY'S LANDSCAPE, LIGHTING AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993- 92 DB. Approval of request to authorize City Attorney to initiate a reformation action to provide an accureie legal description of the Youell Property (APN: 202-061-26). D9. Approval ci Baee Line Road and Milliken Avenue Bicycle Trail Improvement Project, Approve a Notice of Exemption under CBQA, and authorization of nn application for Proposition 116 Grant Funding. IT®1 PVLLEO FOR DISCUSBIOM BY COVNCILI®18ER WILLIAMB. RESOLUTION NO. 91-231 A RESOLUTION OP THS CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY OF RANCHO CUCAXONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TINS APPLICATION FOA CRANT FUNDS FOR THB BASE LINB ROAD AND NILLIKHN AVENUE BICYCLE TRAIL IMpAOVHMENT PROJECT UNDER TF1E CLEAN AIA AND TRANSPORTATION IMPAOVE!ffiNT ACT OP 1990 (PROPOSITION 116) City Council Ninutee Auqud 23, 1991 Page 3 D10. Approval of Reeolutlone for intention to annex to CFD 88-2 and sdoptlnq the boundary map of urea to be annexed. ITm/ PVLLED FOA DI8C088ION BY CWNCIIM61mEB, NRIOST. RESOLUTION NO. 91-232 A RESOLUTION OP THS CITY COVNCIL OF TNe CITY OP RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIPOANIA, ADOPTING BOUNDARY MAP SHORING TERRITORY TO BR ANNSX80 TO AN 8%IS^a ING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. 91-233 .. - -".:: i~,a. ~e s'ne CITY COUNCIL OF THR CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS IMTHNTION TO ANNSY TEAR ITORY TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT D11. Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement (W 91-053) with NBS/Cowry, Incorporated to prepare the tax roll and provide Coneultinq Servicae in relation to CFD 88-2. Agreement not to exceed $10,000.00, to be funded fray Account No. 75-4130-6028. ITEM PULLED FOR DIeCiI882Otl 8Y COUNCILI~ER WRIGBT. D12. Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement (W 91-054) with Brown, Harper, Burns 6 Mentechke foz Legal Counsel related to an annexation to CFD 88-2. Agreement not to exceed $1,000.00, to be funded by the Developer (Watt HOmee). ITBN PULLED FOR DIBCU88ZON BY C0VNCZLNEMBBR WRIOHT. 013. Approval to executes a Profeaeionel Servicae Agreement (CO 91-055) with Empire Economics to perform a market abeorpt ion study Eor CFD BB-2. Agreement not to exceed $5,500.00, to be funded from Account No. 75-4130-602&. ITBN PVLL® MA DISCUSSION BY OOUNCILID:IIBER WRIOHT. D14. Approval to execute a PYOfeesicnal Sety ices Agreement (CO 91-056) with Arown, Harpez, Surns & Hentachke for Legal Counsel related to the formation of a Benefit Assessment DietrlCt to maintain a drainage basin. Agreement not to exceed $3,500.00, to be funded by the Developer (Watt Homes). D15. Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement (CO 91-057) with Wil lden Aeeociatee to perform Aeeeeement Engineer services related to the formation of a Benefit Aeeeeamm~t District to maintain a drainage beein. Agreement not to exceed $9,000.00, to be funded by the Developer (Watt Homes). D16. Approval to award and execute a Professional Services Agreement (CO 91-058) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Norris-Repke, Incorporated to prepare design plane, epecificatione and set imatee for the Haven Avenue Rehabilitation, Widening and Storm Drain improvements from north cf Church Street to approximately 300 febt north of Baee Line Road. The Per Diem not to exceed fee of $84,840.00 plus 30^ coot ingenciee to be funded by Keaeure I, Account No. 32- 4637-9028-4606-4110) and amend Fiscal Year 91/92 budget to include appropriation of $2,500,000.00 foz Haven Avenue improvements Ergo Foothill sou lavard to Baee LLne Road. City Council Minutaa August 21, 1991 Pegs 4 D17. Approval to exeeuta ihs Pips Line Llcanss Agreement (CO 91-059) Mtvasn !M City of Rancho Cucamongs and the Atchison, Topeka and Santa to Railway Company for the Proposed 6eventh Street Storm Drain ConetrucGlon across Atchison, Topalu ~ and Santa Pa Railway Company Right-of-way, Trask No. l0 chaining, Rsneho Cucamonga, California. RESDLDTION NO. 91-236 A RESOLUTION OP THS CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI FDRNIA, APPROVING AND SXBCUTIN6 THE PI PB LINB LICBNSB AGREBM6NT SBTNBEN THB CITY 00 IWiCHO CUCAMONGA AND THB ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA lE RAILNAY COMPANY FDR THE PROPOSED ---'- oavnn uwaaa tua arxut; ralM1 ACNOSS ATCNIHON, TOPEKA AND SANTA P6 AAILNAY COMPANY RICIIT-0P-MAY, TRACK NO. 10 CHAINING, RANCHO CVCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA p18. Approval to award and authorizatian for execution of a revised agraewnt (CO 90-096) with Cucamonga County Nater District for the pezmansnt repairs of water service cuts made by Cucamonga County Water District. D19. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Monumentation Ceeh Deposit for Tract 13753r located at the northwest corner of Scree Line Aoad and Milliken Avenue submitted by Perpetual Asset Management Company, Incorporated, and release of previously submitted Improvement Agreement, Iroprovement Security and Nonumeniation Deposit accepted by the Ciiy Council on March 21, 1990, from Victoria Cucamonga Partners, L. P. RESOLVTION NO. 91-235 A RESOLUTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY OF RANCHO WCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INPAOVBMENT AGREBIffiNT, IMPROVBMENT SBCUAYTY AND MONVMBNTATION CASN DBPOSIT POR TRACT 770. 13753 AND RfiiSASINC THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, iMPAOVBM6NT SSCi1RITY ANO XONUMBNTATION OBPOSIT PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED HY CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 21, 1990 D20. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance Cietrlet Nn. 4 for Bast Greenway Corridor located east of Hilliken Avenue and north of Church Street submitted by Lewis Development company. ASSOLOTION NO. 91-236 A RESOLUTION OP THS CITY COUNCIL OF TH8 CITY OF RA77CH0 CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVBlDiNT AGRBAIQ+'NT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR EAST OAB&NWAY CORRIDOR City Council Ninutee August 31, 1991 Page 5 RESOLUTION N0. 91-237 A A68OLUTI0N OP TNB CITX COUNCIL OP THB CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TN8 ANNEXATION O- CERTAIN TEPItITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAiNTBNANCB DISTRICT NO. 4 POA HAST GREBNNAY CORRIDOR 021. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12332-2, loceted on the southeast corner of Maven Avenue and Tacketem Street, submitted by M.J. Brock. RESOLUTION NO. 91-238 A ABSOLOTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IUNCNO CUCANONOA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVINO IMPROVEMBNT AGREEIdNT EXTBN9I0N ANU SMPR0VEI0INT SECURITY FOA TRACT 12332-2 D22. Approval of Improvement Agreement Sxteneion for Tract 13280 Kenyon Way Railroad Croaeinq, located on Kenyon Wey between Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue, submitted by The William Lyan Caapany. NBSOLUTION NO. 91-239 A RESOLUTION OP TEQS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AcABBMHNT EXTENBION AND IMPROVBMENT SECURITY POR TRACT 13280 AENYON WAY RAILROAD CROSSING D23. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension fox Tract 13738, located on the eouthweet corner of Sapphire street and Almond Stteet, submitted by Aodine Company, ABSOLUTION NO. 91-260 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CZTY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGR88MENT EXTENSION AND IMPR0V6.MSNT SECURITY POR TRACT 13738 D2d. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Hap 12263, loceted on the eoutheaet corner of Highland Avenue and Nilllken Avenue, submitted by The William Lyon Company. RESOLUTION NO. 91-261 A RESOLUTION OP THS CITY COUNCIL OF THS CITY OP RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMBNT AGRBENENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVBMENT SBCURITY POR PARCEL NAR 12283 City Couneil Minutes August 21, 1991 Pagc 6 D25. Approval to accept Improvamenta, Raleaae of Bonda and Notice o! Completion for Tract 13279 Detention Haain located on the aoutheaat corner of Aocheatar Avenue end Victoria Park Lana. ' Aeleaee: Faithful Performance Bond (Strwt) 5518,575.00 RESOLUTION NO. 91-242 A ABSOLUTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL O- TFD: CITY OP AANCF7O CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC INPROVBNENTS 80R TRACT 13279 DETENTION BASIN AND AUTHORIEING THS PILING Ol A NOTICE OP COMPLETION POR THE WORE D26. Approval to accept Improvamanta, ralww of Bonda and Notice of Completion Eor TYaCt 13318 Landscape, locnted On the aoutheaat oorner of Hermosa Avenue and Man ranita Drive. Release: Faithful Performance Bond 5 95,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond $ 9,500.00 RESOLUTION NO. 91-243 A RBSOLVTION OP TIH; CITY COUNCIL OP TNR CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THB PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT I331B LANDSCAPH AND AVTH0RI2ING THB FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION POR Ttffi WORT( D 27. Approval to accept Impzovemente, Aeleaee of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 13565 24th Street Landscape, located on 24th Street tetween Wartlman Bullock Aoad antl San Sevalne Avenue. Re le aee: Faithful Performance Hood (Street) $954,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 85,400.00 RESOLUTION NO. 91-244 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCAr CALL PORNIA, ACCEPTING TH8 PUBLIC IHPR0V8M8NT5 FOA TRACT 13565 24TH STREET LANDSCAPE AND AUTHORIEING TN8 FILING OP A NOTICE OP COMPLETION POR TNB WORE D2 H. Aeleaee of Honda and Notice of Completion for Hnnyan strwt Bridge (Treat 13748(, located on Banyan Street at the Deer Creek Channel. Aeleaee: Faithful Performance Bond $229,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond $ 22,900.00 City Council Nlnutee August 21, 1991 Pa3a 7 RESOLUTION NO. 91-245 A ASSOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH8 CITY OP AANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC INPROVBMBNTS POk BANYAN STREET BRIDGE AND AUTHORIZING THB PILING O! A NOTICE OP CONPLBTION FDA TBB MORE i 029. Approval to accept Improvement e, Release of Nnintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 12365 located at the eoutheaet corner of spruce Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway. Releaee: Maintenance Guarantee Bond $ 42,184.00 030. Approval to release Msintenenee Bonds for Treete 12525 and 12741, located on the west elde of Centel Avenue between Arrow Route end 26th street. Tract 12525 Release: Mnintenance Guarantee Band (street) $ 9x050.00 Tract 12741 Releaee: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 10,700.00 031. Approval to accept Improvements and Release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 12673, located on the oast aide of Milliken Avenue north of Church street. Releaee: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 27,800.00 032. Approval to accept Improvements and Releaee of Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 12739, located on the aouthweet corner of Arrow Reute and Center Avenu0. keleaae: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 20,900.00 ^33. Approval to accept Improvements and Releaee of Maintenance Guarnntee Hond for Tracts 12802 and 12802-1 thru -6, located on the eoutheaet corner of Mountain Vlew Drive and Spruce Avenue. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond Tract 12802 $ 20,100.00 ~: 12802-1 $ fi0,540.00 Tract 12802 $ 25,300.00 Tract 12802-3 $ 7,700.00 Tract 12802-4 $ 12,300.00 Tract 12802-5 $ 18,400.00 Tract 12802-6 $ 27,600.00 034. Approval to accept Improvements and Releaee of Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 13391, located on the northwest corner of ChurcA Street and Terra Vlata Parkway. Releaee: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 23,800.00 Clty Council Ninutea August 21, 1991 Pnge 8 D35. Approval !o Release the Maintenance Luarantw Bond for Traet 13318, loCaiad on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue end Manzanita Drive. e Relenee: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (6trwt) $ 13,600.00 D36. Approval to Vacate a Poztlon of 25th Street, located weal of etiwanda Avenue and setting the date of Public Hearing for September 18, 1991. RBSOLUTION NO. 91-266 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF TR8 CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL IPORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A ' --- ..e i5an aarmaa uwn'rau wear ur arawwnuw wvanua, APPRO%IMATELY 30 FEBT WLDB AND 1092 PEST LONC - APN: 225-082- 01 MOTioN: Moved by Will isms, seconded by Alexander to approve the consent calendar, leas Item Nos. D9, D10, D11, D12, and D13. Motion carried unnnimously, 5-0. x •„~~• DIBCVSSI0N OP ITOI D9. Approval of Maw Liaa Road and Milliken Avenue 6lcycla Trail Inprovwaat Project, Approvs a Notice of Exaarytioo mdsr CNOA, sad authorisation of an application for Proposition 116 Oraat Pundiag. Councilmember Williams stated she wanted to know how the other trails will be prioritized, such ae one up Haven Avenue. Jack Lam, City Manager, et sled there will be an item at a Puture meeting regarding the overall trail eyetem throughout the City, including bicycle traile. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated they chose Base Llne and Milliken to start with because they were aignificauily in place in order to beer nee the footle far installing a complete bike eyetem. He stated the other streets will be considered and prioritised when Chey review the implementation plan. RESOLUTION NO. 91-231 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS POR THE SASE LINE ROAD AND MILLI%EN AVENUE DICYCLE TMIL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT UNDER THE CLEAN AIA AND TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1990 (PROPOSITION 116) MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Buquet to approve Aeaolut ion No. 91-231. Hntion carried unanimously, 5-0. •a~~~x DI BCUBSION OP ITEM D10. Approval of Awalutioos for ialwtion Lo amax to CPD 88-2 sad adopting the bouadap map of area to ba amarad. City Council Minutes August 21, 1491 Vega 4 DIBCU88ION Zl ITID1 D31. Approval to execute • Professional services Agreeeent (CO 91-053) with IIBe/LOwrp, Incorporated to prepare the tax roll add providr Coasultinq eervicet in relstioa to C!D 88-7. Agreerrt! sot to •:ceW X10,000.00, to be funded ftw AccomC Mo. 75-{130-6078. DIBCUBSIOM of ITIX D1]. Approwl !o execute • PnUUiowl 8srvlcet Agrsetenk (CO 91-086) ritb Brown, Btrper, Burnt i aenttchke for Legal Comui relatM to as annezation to ClD 88-T. AgreemeDt rot to exwad j1,000.00, to M funded by the Developer (Nett 9omee). DISCU88ION Op ITmI D13. Approval to execute • Professlonai 8eeviCH Agreesent (CO 91-055) rllh BepiH 6eonoeiea to perform a earket tbsorptioa sludv fot CT BB-T. 1lareer,...~ +..! ~- _~~~~„ G., `.Lv.vJ, ro a funded frw Aeeomt lb. 75-U30- 60T8. Councilmember Wright etntetl she understood that Lhese items were an annexation into an existing CPD for the purpose of collecting an aaaetament Eor law enforcement. She stated she was against the original formation of that Aeta9eroent District and wee et ill opposed to it, and that there was the possibility that this Dittriet would be abolished in the near future. Mayor Stout asked if this nnnezat ion included anything other than law enEorcemenC. Duane Baker, Ae9ietant to the City Manager, stated it was only for law enfoxcertrent, it ditl not include the drainage eyeiem. Na stated this was a condition of the tracts for the developer to be able to recortl the map, and if the Council ditl not adopt these items, tlirectlon would be n¢eded on how the developer could proceed. He further stated that this was presently vacant land, antl the condii lone of this CPD were that vacant land would not be assessed, which would give the council time to review the CFO. Thexe would be no homeowners affected by the decision at this particular time. Mayor Stout stated that the current requirement was for the developer to annex into Chia District. If the Council decided in the future to abolish the District it would hold them harmless, but the developer could not proceed if Chey were not annex¢d into the Dietxict, eo was requesting this annexation. RESOLUTION NO. 91-232 A RESOLUTION OF THA CITY COUNCZL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPOANIA, ADOPTING BOUNDARY MAP SHOWING TERRITORY TO BE ANNEXED TO AN 8%ISTING COMMUNITY FACILITI63 DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. 91-233 A ASSOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP TX$ CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPOANIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO AN E%ISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT HOTTON: Hovel 6y Alexander, seconded by Stout to approve Resolution Noe. 91-232 and 93-233. Motion carried 4-3 (Wright no). City Council Ninutan Auquei 21, 1491 Page 10 NOTION: Moved by Alexander eecondsd by Stout to approve Item Noe. D11, D12 and D13. Notion carried 4-1 (Nrlght no). ~ e E1. CONSIDBAATION OF A AECYCL80 PAOOUCTS POLICY AND ORDINANCB AIRNDMENT Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clerk, Yead the title of OtdinsnCe No. 328-A. ORDINANCB NO. 328-A (second reading( AN OMINANCB O! TER CITY COUNCIL OF TH6 CITY OF fU1NCEi0 CUCANONCA, CALIFORNIA, AMBNOING CHAPTER 3.08 OF THE IUNCNO CVCAHONGA CITY CODE BY ADDING SECTION 3.08.240 RSLATINO TO PMICIIRP.ERNT OF RBCYCL60 PRODUCTS NOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Alexander to waive full reading and approve ordinance No. 328-A. Notion carried unanimously, 5-0. ~ ~ • . • x F. 11I1VERTI86D PUBLIC ~71AINO8 Pl. CONSIDERATION OP RECREATIONAL VEHTCLE PARAING AND STORAGE - Review of current City regulations affecting storage and parking of Aecrsat ional Vehicles on private tee:dent ial properties. (COatiaued fro. June 19, 1991) (BTAlF REQUESTS THIB IT®1 B6 CONTINUED TO OCTOHEIt 16, 1991) Nayor Stout stated the Council Subcommittee was et 111 meeting and reviewing this item and have requested a continuance. MOTION: Roved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to continue Item P1 to the October 16, 1991 meeting. Motion Carried unanimously, 5-0. • . . . . . P2. CON U RAT ON NG TFR VA O O SOU H O N TH T V N S (COnYinued Eros August 7, 1991) (STAlP RBQV66Ta TEI8 ITEN B6 CONTINUED TO 86PTEIRER 4, 1991) MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to continue Item F2 to the September 4, 1991 meeting. Motion Carried unanimously, 5-0. . . ~ ITHNB F3 AND Pe HERE COMBIDERED AT T~ eA16 TINE. City Council Minutes August 21, 1991 Page !! P3. &ONS IDBRATION OF BNVIRONMENTA_ AS68S NBNT FODTHZ xu :~ SPBCIPIC PLAN AMENDMBNT 90-04 - lOOTHi - A request to modify the median break location on Foothill Boulevard, to add a median break location on Foothill Boulevard, and to change the land use designation from Light Industrial to Regional Related Commercial for an area of approximately 26 acres within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea 4), located on the east aide of Interstate 15, south of Foothill Boulevard. These requests are in conjunction with the development of a plus or minus 60 acre retail/commercial center located on the south aide of Foothill Boulevard between Interekata 15 and 8tlwanda Avenue - APN: 229-031-03 through 13, 15, 16, 20, and a portion of 59. Related Pila: Conditional Use Permit 90-37. Staff report presented by Scott Nurphy, Ae9ociata Planner. Nayor Stoui stated ho thought this item had been Wfors the Council previously on an appeal by the Developer for recommended mitigation measures. Scott Muzpi,y, AeeocLate Planner, stated the Point of Interest designer ion was automatically referred to the Council for aeiion, and there were recommended mitigation measures by the Historic Preservation Commission ae part of that resolution. It was not necessarily nn appeal by the developer. Mayor Stout asked what was the effect of the council agreeing that the mitigation recommendations were appropriate. Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, staled it was viewed ae a recommendation to the Planning Commission trecauee final action was not being taken on the Snvironmentnl at that time. The Planni nq Commission fait that six of the seven mit igatione wee appropriate with one modiflcat ion, and that action has been appealetl. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Phil Ramming, Watt non Company, stated ti:ae there was a feeling that they were taking 60 acres of vineyard history out of circulation. He felt it was everyone's understanding that there were two cultural reeource6 on the property, the Craftsman style haoe9, and the remainder of the property does not contain a vineyard currently, so it was not really a 60 acre impact, just a two home impact. Ne stated the other point he wanted to make was that they felt the mitigation measures should address the two homes and did not feel there was a link between the cultural reeourcee on site and the Chaffey barn project. He also wanted to clarify that condition number six had been changed eo that demolLtion permits were to be issued on grading permits, not on the building permit e. James Frost, City Treasurer, felt that from hie involvement with the Etiwanda Historical Society they were loosing their heritage, and commended the Planning Commieaton, Historic Preservation Commission and the CLty council for recognizing this ae an opportunity to display a part of Che community's history before it was loot. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. City Council Minutae Auquet 21, 1991 Page 12 Mayor Stout stated that the Counetl had an extensive debate about Yhie Leaue, aann¢¢ at the time felt it waa appropriate to put In this condition. He mated they met with the Historic Preservation Cosmieelon recently, and one of the Comsieaion•e concerns was that when they reviewed Lssues and nude tindinga, their work would be subordinated to the Planning Commission, and that they ware not receiving the benefit of a Council hearing. The Council assured them that when there was a disagreement between the Planning ca®Seaion and Historic Preservation coamiseion, the council would ultLnately decide the Seeue, whleh wee why he asked for this item to came forward tonight. Ne felt thin was procedural sines they had already decided the issue and ngreed the conditlone were appropriate, but wanted the Council to make the final decision when [wo Commieetona dieagrN. He stated the second part of this issue wu that w:.e.. «~. ;• 'in.,. ~,; xne matlgatione __r. .Ley iwax cols waa a valuable eaammnlty resource with respect to the winery operations Chet ware tMre et one Limo, uW pntionad the requiramenLs when the Virginia Dare winery was developed to save the tower thst wee considered significant. He stated with this project they ware beaieally allowing them to destroy the two buildings left on the property, end felt hevlnq a museum constructed was a small price to pay for allowing this. He thought there wee a strong nexus between the construction of the barn and the museum that will W housed in lt. He felt the conditlone that were originally recommended were appropriate. councllmember Nilliame concurred that they should go ahead with the original decision, that it waa appropriate to preserve the heritage Oy using the museum format. councilmember Wright eteted another option to preserve historical significance would be to have little pieces all over the City, but dad not feel it was appropriate with that site and agreed with Mayor Stout. RESOLVTION NO. 91-20'1 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, POOTHILL BOULEVARD SPBCIPIC PLAN AHENDMENT NO. 90-04, REQUESTING TO AMEND THS FOOTHILL BOULBVARD SPECIFIC PLAN TO MODIFY THE MEDIAN eRBAR LOCATION ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, TD ADD A T18DIAN BRBAE LOCATION ON POOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND TO CNANGB THE LAND USE DESIGNATION PROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO REGIONAL RBLATBD COMMERCIAL FOR AN AREA OP APPROYIMATBLY 26 ACRBS WITHIN TNS FOdfHILL BOVLBVARD SPBCIFIC PLAN (SUBAREA 4) LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF INTBRSTATS 15, SOUTH OP FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, IN CONJONCTION WITH TN8 DSVBLOPlIENT OF A PLU3 OR MINUS 60 ACRE RETAIL/COMMERCIAL CENTER LOCATED ON THE 90UTH SIDB OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN INTEItSTATS 15 AND BTIWANDA AVENUE, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THHR80F - APN: 229- 031-03 THROUGH 13, 35, 16, 20, AND A PORTION OP 59 MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to approve Resolution No. 91-247. ae moditied. Notion carried unanimously, 5-0. City Connell MLnuNe August 21, 1991 Pe9e 13 F0. APPEAL OP ENVIRONMENTAL ASBE98wENT a 'ONDITIO 066 PE KIT 90 7 POOTHI ~*~ arreT a0E p aTME _ Appssl of the Plsnning CommLsion'• decleion pertaining to cartsin Historic Preesrvation conditions Ln conjunMion with the rsqussi for a master plan Approval for a plus or minus 60 acre retell/commeralal center containing appcoximately 550,000 square teat of leasable apace end a request for Approval of conceptual site plan end building elsvetiona toc a Price club facility in the Regional Re1atW Commercial designation of the loothlll Boulevard Specific Plsn (Subarea 4), located on the south side o! loothill Boulevard between Interstate 15 and Etiwanda Avenue - APNr 229-031-03 through 13, 15, 16, 20 and • portion of 59. Related Pile: Foothill Boulevard Swclfic Plan Amendment 90-04. Associated wi[h the project Sa Trw Removal irormit 91-2a. Staft report presented by BLroti MuzpAy. See Stem F3 for discussion and public hearing comments. Mayor Stout stated he would not have a problem with limiting the amount of oral Histories taken, and would recommend that Item 1 on pegs 200 bs stricken, Dut that subsection C, Item 7 remain. ABSOLUTION NO. 91-248 A RESOLOTION OP THS CITY COUNCIL OF THS CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL 068 PERMIT 90-3), A RBQUBST POR NASTHR PLAN APPROVAL POA A PLUS OR MINUS 60 ACRB RETAIL/COM1ffiRCIAL CBNTRR CONTAIN ZNG APPROXIMATELY 550,000 SQUARE RBBT OP LBASABLB SPACB AND A REQVEST FOR APPROVAL OP CONCBPTVAL SITE PLAN AND BUILDING BLEVATIONE POR THE PRICS CLUE FACILITY IN TID3 PEGIONAL RELATBD COMIO:ACIAL DESIGNATION OP THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN (SUBAREA 4), LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDS OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BBTWBAN INTBRSTAT6 15 AND ETIWANOA AVENUE, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SOPPORT THEp80P - APN: 229-031-03 THROUGH 13, 15, i6, 20, AND A PORTION OP 59 MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Wright to approve Resolution No. 91-248 ae moditled above. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. • • • e O PUBLIC BEARINGS No Items Submitted. • • ~ @ CITY MANAGER 8 eTAP! REPORTS NO Items Submitted. City Council Minutes August 23, 1991 Page la • • No Items BubmLtted. . • • . • . J1. CouneLlmember Williams stated she would llks a report on the situntion regarding the installation of telephones !n the parka, and suggested nlteenatl o~ funding sources to allow them to be ins ~~.lo_ ... o Limeay aNnner. M R • • t kl. Victor Falco, resident of the Caryn Comounity, referred to the assessment collected for the Landscaping and Maintenance District for 1967(88 and felt thla should have been refunde8 promptly. He caked if this money was refunded, would interest be paitl to the residents, and would the refund 90 the raeldente who were living in the homes et tnet lime 1f they hove moved since then. Mayor Stout stated it was hie understanding that the assessment money would belong to the current homeowner living in the house. Jack Lam, City Manager, et ated the residents in that area were contacted and they overwhelmingly requested a refund. Those refunds should be processed Ln the next thirty tlaye. Interest will not b¢ refunded as the funds were held in a special account toz the Landscape District, and all moony held in that fund goes towards the maintenance oY the District. R2. Joe Yancey, resident on Iry, stated he has received two parking citations far his R.V. being parked on the street for being an overweight vehicle. He stated there are signs posted in hie neighborhood regarding comaetcial vehicle weight limitations but did not feel hie R.V. was a commercial vehicle, and that no R.V. could meet the weight limit atlon in the code. He stated the officer told him the code would apply to hie R.V. ae well ae Commercial vehicles. Mayor 6tout stated he was having the Police Department look into this sltuatlon to clarify the interpretation of the code. He would also Have the city Manager's Office look into this for him• k • R k City Council Minutia Au9us! 21, 1991 Ysge 15 MOTIONS Movad by Wright, seconded by Buquet to adjourn. Motion oarriatl ~ unanimously, 5-D. Ths meatlnq adjourned st 7e53 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Jan Sutton Deputy City Clerk Approved: en=•ne• O P 0.00 O +NIONO+ O +Y N ON • 1• N W M N w N iwwwe °e se°:•wDOiaeeasoiawina i1011N VMNNONVNNNNNMN•V•NNMM N MN N NN• N N V iii°en°ai°e°De°e •+IVn+NNNO+ WNNN ONNNWN h N N + O A ! L n A A A `J++W!-•!•NNn V OlO-•Nn+MOh•IONNnIn+h W N W JN niN+l•YN~Oy ~Ny 1Ny ryN ail W SM1NNN NI{T, Ti f+ANT•y R~L'A&!~f•AfiQ ~RR7tR YiR R~RAJngwRAm8wil 11 •IN N19 o•'.wN~nw+•iiiln~wwlnewnwwwmwanwnwawwnwwwnwwwwwnwwwwwwan .°~ S fhl uKw i~ =;0 ULO OOy FW er. J r ` Y •` •i •O • I 1 IL 1• • Y NrO+M Y NNN W Ofi n Y AV s\h•e NYi •ww n Nrr • Nn +ON1WN oL N\n W + NWJ N n N On n „n•w_NN NNN••NMr N N VJ N • i L• N MNNNwN ' + ` N O NN O O e iN ur wa« L•W N -• pY: n+\ yY SY rN •=e Y w w+ a YYa o NNYu l yJYW iW WN • +N WONrOV WwN NVY+• O VfVi wWyWVeMLNh •N W<Y M\V NW+ •w L V\V tWN\OVtif iN w MJ ShnrJV J NN+V YNYOSMNw y VNVM'JV+iO VOWiYM • YNr•NNL•MwY i•IV NLLwiiwY OOMOVJM fy YO w y~0. 1,~ LMO C N Mw OO.O \ N_ YYY Jw Y N OOrY•Nn0 MN\ 1 YSnNNL j W N ~J~JLY MJYJV O YYYrNVWrONi WJw •YJtVYYYV 3 V YO •i JM J i Y 1• OYWL-YNLiWV J N WY YJJYYON > NYy~Ji f Nw0 YYMNY « Y H _1 Mi N N 00_-J_W-J LO M~L••pV0 A wVYN~VMNLNMON 0:10 riiNO<N LOIN s Y NO t • NOW• NOYWWWNWNJ<MS ~O • )iNnY> r LLIOLLY YLVOL•Y NhNrWYfYYO Yi Lr NLWWNNhMNN O NYO'OOJ JO• NNNMNMNNNNNJNY9rLOOW OOL000pONO y MLrVt Yr\rNMMiJNNNNMNSNO•> iri Xis iiiif ii Y fJiYiV FiYiff<YLffffffNf MOOiY I'.1ti r9999NMD y • J<WYYiY LWiYJJJYIJJJJJJiJLLNiLWN N6WiLLLLLiL = Y YM'NwVN ='=:VVVL~YVYYYVNYOOy+i~~ ••i r~iYW<S<) Y > iMLNLr NMNY Y hNl` ONLJNNMNNrN O • ONYO••9 O~J OOi0iOJ090D OLFNYO 1NfONNMNNiN O V VOSYL>tY +>YYLLLL `N WYYWYVW YYOSJIyW •J>iJJJJJYJ > i Yf000iY VOJSYYYYiiYWYWiV iYl-NYO'J NUOWUVYYYYV r y F a_ i ~ f 2 L Y J ~Y ~ J W i _ O S D V W V N N i Y Y yV_ J J J O N pJ N y a ` .`l W S i y V NS iY e S NO N rJ F ~[ i O iVYV F iV J 'J 1 a N1 O ~V MY YirN rf J VY I Z r Of N•ri rNwZ aWi iW iW W ~ a+ 2 W 00 lSi )iYa JiV>a ON +f 9•• WMLY O JJr N• J > a:N LJO nOJ WLiY0ii0 iOV) t N : OiN NVONNiYrLrLi OWr i Wi O• i ~ iS VLNOCYiJ09r•JaWYWnNwN SNO OYYeWSOWiN j 'rj NOY aWYafVJOJNYDYOJWiWJNfU Wf ZYf~SwNS y LWJaVN ea N S >N L NiL J l•VN N••OM N:D): . iLW S . .. :~ ..J » i a ry sseN •ie oYiYO i +u~~s Y •e ai+•.iY ) •V ONW OONN •)N iM WiSM •2N iW •W JY>Y •a JJa) L a Yi>\•L> itOiNerN~\1 •LN>JNYL •W NO fVNWar VVO S N JOVOYfi YU))aOrN )IJYSrJ)WhJ•YVO~Li VfJYJJ~NNJJ V ) ffiYVVY YVODWLY NWW iiLLLiNN NNMY>ii2iiY p ==0wN06 =~w0w+pn+NOOJ O•-eN•-NO w^O Ni•Nw+1-OpNO w1 wwwNN nP-•O-•~NeP w ••w +n N +ONNNNL nw-.wwwwN. w aai+ewe 'aei++w+ii+i++++~~eMM' .'.n NNNNN N e NOONOVOONOINOONhOV00000NONO000000hVONO000VOOp0 O SNOO-V-OOVO-00-VMNOONOO-MNNO-VV-ONVNOVOOOOONOwO ~ NhV~NNhihYYNONi-ONNhn•rNNIV~NOrNNNNVVNrwNVONVMN O w w wNalw N •VN NNNN w NN ON N N N V O w iNN j~r YYI =;0 iYD DO Y N MY OMl J Y N L V Z• w N M A N N A l N N `J`IIN•~P~yy ~~yy ~~Nyy A~w^^^1IN1I11www1IO1~11OW+N•NI+N• ~•POM+O+ N~O~11 ywa1111N11~~N IyNy~~11V//~~NF yy~1M O++~NiN+N IrN +VM•i ~N~i! 11O.~>1N~FM W~~NNI~IN NIN~INNNI~IN NNII~~i Ia~I~Il In~A ~I~I al IO N11111 a1N a1N Al IIXXRMR7tA NION N_NN >O Y f O O O i ONM~NNNNNNNNNNNMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN Y V I I O O Oi NN VV NO • i P . N: 9• »Y W :N M V-N h i iY N N iV J Yi iN iN N i i> i NN Y i0 Y iNi• L• OV O N NYF J \Y Yi N N NYi_ M O IIVN N VI Yi9 MN Y -~ YY NM Y NJ ~~ »1 N Y YN ~LY1~ O Y• f ! ~l O• ` i >O_ YY1li ~J w1Y IhNYM NY NO OV V M YyYiNO \> V IN\w\N \JNM MhIJ O_\w•\_V Y JVNV JwHNy~O WWrY !~Y N S N NSV Y N'iJf Y\Y O N < SiVIW t Y= L WNY•LW> 9 W Nwui>Mh piii IVyiO Y•ililN l > yiOiOl li w • V ~MNiii Y11 i~00ZW GNJYiQw JwJO~HY M iZiNOIrIOf W h • YJ\WIIN OuNu •N Yi\ilhy\_ NY\Y NN•i0•NJN VhV l i O Y fIIHIVNIVi ~'JhW~ >III.Y N'J O~ » J i NYWINY~~~~Jw l i J M~ FMWO>ii'JFl WWM W• ihi~Mi• YJ J ~ V iNiY~WAOfpOMl twM yW YY •N YN• yW i_7lOllilZMD~WHNINaVY i \ l NMY>IIJYYlrYi`a• WrWW W_Ml ` VN hMlUiiMNMO\MhYJl iViWWJ WiNNOiWWVWW•YW VWhtMJiN WOW NONU i 9 IFiYV JWNOiJUOFYN W>i LhUOfi JWYJYN iiViO YM V NYYYNO hMLihi •OYO i>hY Na ~Y> l • ~Jp yp O>JWhiMNJiNOYiY•fNYiYM\Fi>Nil>OWYwWOFiON Y J WWYM>WfiNi\MfailhNiNr~~WiONIaINNOV>lM~060G60iON N S N JO M ~ W A N YN O M~ ~ V Oih ai W •VZ f VOi ~ M Z ViZNW i O O Y W YVWI ni0 J O SrVYO JYn ___ < NiWpp O V h WNiYp! >It h h OF V 1R MJ iOONlti W Vh~N nU i i J4a WOpVJV< JZrW NiiWOOi V O:M~1p lV Lll s<Na <lGfnV N < OOWOSWhO N W N sY h~~rhiNOrN JNOrV r ~ NY•OU W Jl •i YMONVWf •W OiO LO•WlNN~M• hFhifO a i O _ _WJ JIWh>'1 Wi V000110 •i<JFO J i WEra Wa•f0 tff> NiFi:V•slU iVwF_<lJ•S5i O fist OlViiW NWh• ii<WON aaJY 01. i i u luhi °wi~i•iu"i °zooio oooi~uJ.iairclii~iiu~~~>i~~ieo>iairN.°u~ O N JMZN6yWrViaaZNYIiNOWitVNMIVJin IWFLZiii09VM » p ~ •<i!!lli~~•!•••alop00000oOpOYUYUVUUVYVYVYYY00p0 rn~h N.I»~Np.Ip~=T~wpmPNh~~.~01MOOppNOhOPPNwpN•PNON r M p~N MltloP ooPN w1 mNwN P~ ! N NY pNNmNNwNYMN TnNryw NwwNNp N pVtNNwN MNNw !~ N; Y~ ~% ~ • w~i wi. •~ •I/r \rr I~< O~i Y% f Olil ww>w111N IY•OIIIOIOwNeNV0000iiwIN•~ V IwwNyyOLNVOO •OMN•MwNNIwIN~iNIf O10NIwN1i10011www•N Iw~IwNM•IIOVOw wOMMN O•'iw NNVwhwwNNVwNONi.NZNir 1`•rM~NMwVV~NhIVNNwrNp~wO+ NNN NNY N Mw NAN NV•< N M PVNN M wMw NN + N V N M N J i V p + :Nw 5:: ur =;e iW0 00 LMW oN• J r V ~O •O •i JN FVI•NNYNNwfNYMIwLwNNf Nf 1•NwwNNwlNfl••YNONWNfN'Z>wi0••NNVN Ylp l•I Ih1 SIR RRRRRRRRRRR RRRRRRARRSSSSSSSSSS:::::.«:3::7..::: .........•IIIIw.II1wr.Iw..11I1I111r1.rr s.I.Ir11I1... pNNNwNwN w+iw NNNwwNwwwwwwNwNwNNNwNNNNwwnwNNNwNNNNNNNNN K Yf L •L w r N I Lw • L r f L irM INiI j ww • NM Yf •il \ • < J Nn >N Y y OifNp>Y \w F J w ON 1 NNw J w YYVNYL \> 1 i L< hM =N YIN J N yNMy Y M ON Y `« Y iy Vw\N9 L 9ILSN_« NR hN i V O <'JL NJ y ZI1N Ir• ~1 N`iLVyN ~> W yL yF0 =0 ~\Y.Y>Yi. i ME°»Ni ~O w y >L t O •NNO<Y-II M iN •iN0 \ FN M <O <i• wi J iNLw\ MVIMYM N• J J V JMN V `WL~OJ Y M V JM \• yN O L• W L «N LLNNO N < •IY IY f MY r L w WN M•91 LNwY Y YiY JL W .WWW > V Ny W_\_J NNiNNiMM iV W WYJ> LyLLY <f N «NY ''JJWM« r i<V WW MOr«NLOW>ti Ww Y LfyyYJNWV NWLOW r Y Ji ~LJJJ •LJWp W• >OhNi • LpLLRf L00 N„ WO) i M aJLrp•>.WWN« LON MWJi •>••LiV V i Wif L Nr WLO•WNW UW LNJw Sr~'~LMhrrW YW~J YYj L<Oi' _> r=Y'MJ• WWL>W> iW i NrI.sNNphrwrrWa+r~ua r-rrynW a n<nr ~zr`-h<rsJ v«iiu as iili ii'YL~i~<i'oir oi~iiiiaW ar°i°~iii~i'uiiiunW~ ~lJi wWiOW>JypYyp iMNVJpJpNhMN 1YVpVYVhWPAJONfiyOFFVJ>h iprh •JypUM ~M~1F>Il~~\~UYIL~VMYyYrwNJrOOpYL~NUN>JtOOUVOVLUVUJiMN i u iN . ~ .i.e i i .r r. •«.u e rV JL f LL <N J h ~ S •V • ~ $ y i6r S W M •Z NJN NNV VL V Z J« WO Jp «<« Y J.• O rY WV wJJ ZO PV )N <~ «tW 00 SN i Z WN i V« W. •i.ZJV W< p«N 2 •O •VZ y MU •ri «J rL yy VSJZ ZV LMir iiJ ILLIW L~W Nwiy~uwi NJZr V•ZiWV FFF.p«.i• iOMi<WNrYO pOWWWOr WrL «>'16 OJSSO Vr NO. OVSU)O W• O OON«i=„1V rw« 1• •ZiiiVYlN iNV 'WW •h NOOYF •• SF L•• Z >OSZL wi7ZNVVri Y.JJN)aOVOJWi«<OMVaZN«VW OoOJOwYeIWe•WWWWLLWLVWV VUVUZZSSSiSZ2ii2LM•ii M'IYZ iM •ZfJJJ~iiii wIp-OFNpNMwnrNi•uPNNNNOPPnNNMynnNnnnpWPn~N••N>r•••nwONPnOM aowNNYwNepene P..we.N+eeNwNwee.NJ~JH naeN+^~NTe+)+ NN TN NNNnNnMNNnp• N~n••••nN + n<Nn 3 i w~ ..~ u• ii -ONO=rywNw-ieoo if i-eem«hv---eiwl-wn-iN-eii w---aetln- O-N- VIV-nNNO0iN000wiOwh-OiNOw-OwM-i0010 N-000--NO •M-eiOhVO-NrwhMNNNMVNNV-_NO NOVwMiNNO~ij R~Oi• n i~N ONOO- ChM-VNNN-MYNNn100wNVn wY1n1, OMA>w'INmNVNNNNnIN wAA.1.wIwNN w N N _• N V{O V `NP fl VYI =;0 V + 00 Ow! Ji h A u w N i A J'1«-wOwNNVNOI.ONinnNVNOhiwO«NwlNihi-OJNwIMV-OwNwfNlh- 5i"J iiiS~iii7"1 ii3113SSS3S3+.Niiiiiiiii1iS37SJ=iiiG::'.:: ......iYii.-Y--<i..--iiii--iiii-.Yiiir.il-.....i ONNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNM i M r. V O i y i O O Y <Y t L O A ~ V t f J O N p Y Y N I 7 L O.I N Y J i Yo P <O ~ WNjO N O A Y i>rh YVVhJ A{s h i-JIIW[ W\h'J <ON it N~ : W-uu -Srs wu«h shu hr Y • lF M H9 «i WWi ~W i)YA O YN ) O wY<O YY iOIO\ V Yi Ml>F ii<YYY hf a=\•L JO i~YN<YY~YVN iVMh~tY~VN 60MW{ Y •W~OIWYWVIH y NyMM fhiiW V OYN OM<WYYF N N Wi •[Y OfW•N NJ N O •Y Y hJYM N iMY 9 9 Vh WOJiN 00 Wr Yi ONhYhWOYOY JO WNYNYJN < J\~ W YOhJMiW NJ„i Y Yi0 YO r O\ Y irV < 00. rl < hii .fir M'JYi •M YY O W OJiWJY2iV~ U h i9 pWp YNOWh h OiYh U YWO<JWOO NhNNO t YWYJi i =ij ONW N I• iir Y J6oiiNi: F ^OwLUNhNhO V NMYisJLM O_'J OiWYY=~ O JWO nV• IiNO:A:i Z Vh JwV A YWY~YNS)OiWMNwUO«<JYhWOrweit Y«IJ iYOfOVeViWaiY )yVy~~)JhJU M iFYN'JO M\LrhiFJw h Y iFh)Y NyyY iUh jp`~JSNIRiO<0tl lIN~111N10 OOrM7000r~'J>NO<jlail~tpp~J r UROOIViI<AOINYMV NII YiiYOiONwVOrJOrNUNi V 26 2 2 ~ O yy i F N N] RZJ pO YJ i N Li wpi •OA O .jN SiWi hM1O~ V iJ . _ hW UJ. h WJ UiiM iihi Ji4i h N uF FZV : VJ aRi YVFp f NW.iN My MO OWw pf• SW Jh .7)O .Oi iJ WiJi VNiW) SNi_a0Y0 V O< V240 p• WO 9iO«•VOJW w V{~ iNOWJO:n N.oa„i=NO.Y W •i wt~ ZLYfZJ.tY2 iWia iJf) O OMW OVh i NN'J W2=pVjjpWO «~ MY •Ja OV WiJhNV VW.• i « wJ Wh VYN i.ii` •p<s Nirp .. .suOh.itla• wa WZL :VWF WiaJZJJVO ~~+ •F 1-N WNaaa• V io2 a wW .l YJUW OiNOR<YVSW .OONR N YfMrJ• huh ~aJpxNh.. ~W:Yr 2tl FFeYNZZ~ .YNnWahtlhx 'ORONNVWW OWW OUVJwM'~ iOUiM ~F O\2 „~~NZI OShRii600RiiZa ViiZiW.N RZZRi2a22iip0000Y00GL6lpOYRR666tiNNNnNNMN 1- r M ` V VWN W° hoi Oi MOU 1 is Yi°Y O PO Ni JhJM i1J JYJO N •0± J•f A I~JNipWW Y wwiu Ya[WN °n ~R~a~.+Wu III~aWJYOJMp ONiLYVYiN J Jy <a JwW N Nii ~iN HVW .Sh 1. i WiWNY DL OFWNWN hM NirWi7NYh Yi`pW. .: r<J.iSC~J J.<WRWI>V a«u2ztlwW YY~UirrOJO WWWWWtlJi NNMNNNNNN NNONNwNNOnhOwNNNO.00h. NN NnONOOVm• nhh. m.Mw mONww00<m NnN NTJN~am NN wNN~NNNN V+1Nhm Ir1m PhNNTNNN wNNNVNNNA w w V_ u tN! a~w u~= €.° i-e .oo rr~ NW e~• 6 V L •. ; ., ., .: ~ W. y. ~ .; , -, n~~ w~1 \~ Iir~i ~~si a~ e~i~i a i .• i W• ~• e• i i ~~ i `COI 6i' •• •s ii 0 y r N Ip li IH IM v W• ii i• orasf awrarwNnerwvra w arorarawwrowrrowras ~. woeiiwii=.iriio~w.iiw w NNNNI^NNaea~ww=M^wN ^ si w w J>•MNnawawf waMNNlwVr c:s=ssssssssssast:s: ow nines wwwwwwMnwwNwwnw Y _ _ V L ni W i • ii woY Vi s ~ -wyui1 -Iii~ r ~ 3 fnaa ~iya~ r $ ~ ~ru~riuriiirr r J ~ NYMFaM•YiaiY i `n`-JyJyi~•-YVNnYNY N L 6W9NrlWirlW` L 1Ya9=NWe~aiw i _ `CC - -J9f MMJ-YOYO t W• Vii-WiN-N i r~rM rYi •NaYiiY~a e V NV L YYai •WV P M WYMi iriJa »NOrN ius " s uii~~ai °i iii faWaWY \f Oi f w• OYV •Y Uf iriMWMYZiarU VJ N:uuJWiWCJriMM1iN Oi~rUNiHVOi-fUy~[i1Vi . ~~ ~~ W JW i y IS W `O14 wi ~NV.r JwU iiVe~JtMJ~nuWl iW~JM~ •StiWVr Oi.V JNWN~OWr2iOWJ r~YNrJ eWVj V=tYa .~{ SyrtN • e •V ~ViN•NJW ie .U iO ONNWIiNC[.VJi •.Sr wW iiiiis~>'~ii i..Ni~oeo2 `iiiisii;wM;.Jf..f eW nrr~nrao>s>iiaiis iw.Wi O ~NV~NNf N~pNrMgb~OPn ~nnNmnNnINNNNNNm ry~nN O v u u=P u{N Zs zf0 WO IInW ONi >JO n ~ V ,~. i :, 3 ..; :' V• I ~~ i P•<i ~tll \t<I O:i W ~ i F ~ i f ~~ i W;ii iei ti O M N N O Ni Wt i• i• i• e• e• W• e e r ooeeeeonoooeooen.ee•Oe O a VOONOONaN0000NOet00000 D ^ 'NJeatleNNnrrNNONrNMwnN O NNNNNNNtNeN N„HONNONN O . . N p w O N N N wveeooNDOO 1 oteoeenoNr NNOtwnOew~ O ~NtPNaNnNN MP N w L A A n ~ JiNNNrNtNrnePONNNINOMi00ANNtMhONONNNtNr! G;eS«R°N.4R.4.°..°1R««NY1«N««««ww"~x wlnn "+~S nni~^NrNrINn >•eee etleoooeeetloooeetle•eeeeeetlooeeoooeee ONNMNNNNNNMNNNNNNNNNNNNNMNNMNNNNNNNNNNNM Y V I Itll a e0e li j 0 z r a =e i.r V a w II n0 N waA N ON NO N N !O NO NaNWNP =N N • W ~NJ • Ne •ri ' O O W VL iiZr F Nw aN\ N W• N) WLrnO nNN1110M M J JV~IY N W ONN y00 Yy ~~le N P < VJIV .V iN wi hYr rWi ~ J>M NN M'JN \ n y)V Wy yW fi0 WW V~tlJ iV O•NOiiNJO O VO Ni iM iMl yyWh y: „ N WINJN n v JN NJVWOO `JJpMNV<ywN OMM7Yhl~OM W Z O iO~9Ztl !W JJ<J:= WI ~ J • Off OOW ~M OMWi.J O Y~1 VNM` N O OW NaY~I~ 290h~~l~NWi N~'NJG9W\J\V a N „iIfWONn IM OeiONN M i J J W YN >iNZ 9) I INMV 1\ O LLY>Ni NLILiONNtlO1M WFWWw3i> tl > O t i0<LO< WOOWit Oi =OOVO~\riN N w11 > iFi i>JiV> Jhn 7)L%iNOi wNMiMJN nNi y N MiNZJO Yiii>091 L9 IiiMi NiOW y W iW a WiN{i WWOOiiMO 1\ •WWiW •y WNN _ F V:I.~Ii iJ Niii WI<MW =ii~iN>iOL W O JJOIL h ~tl iiWi » n9N=:Y ) h peps MWNOff OVr O V 10f< <e V ` YiiliLiWntlFiLLi<tNN N i\ni JW O W 00JiOJM iiii9! N y>N Niiii• iW0 J ZWII NLWi<OM<LWWWNn<NNi{ I LJWJN i j t>WAW>fi00JW » WO<JrMWJ „)>i>~W>NO Y. p yOWwWOJi<iLi00i\CVNiNV OOiO JOWA ~Y 3 pN JN J Oi h Mi W W W > V Z W V N ~ J U_ N J J l r~ J f 9 S p H O ~1 M V J J e ~ M i~ J iOW ~ J Wih W O E<YNO J NWV 1 O{O V VAN J •>i Z i VN N n9 >J< WYWieV H •~NOI j iO~i l hJNaZ > 9WON V__V Ji_ •4 <UNO •W Yj NDM= ~ O i { p i • V>ON O~Y~~W •OW YNNOWY00 u V if• i2 iiiVO ZJ9 iV ii' lJ«Vi V VLWV9N_i >9MY~~ipZ if WiN WiJNYO i > 6DnOWyyVNfJJOONO~`JY(NNnW< J>NOONiOiV W LMN~i•Jnii~~~<Zi0iWW00 UJVWi~f W{O J N`6UZN0`VZi VOiF90>OiW_ JiJfUJiii < i9<MN O<VNY9NiNM0< MNNWiffftW y i N eVVV001\VSliiiiiClOWiNN nhfiiZll O NNNONnONWPNtNPNNOOnNP iOw•NaNWP n ± N •OOONNnPNNNNNNNNr.NNN. •N.ONNNwaN .. as aaNN•a tt•a N N N NNNN«N i< O r •iM tllN u~~ Oa0 L; 0~ /FO 6p ~: JK V P N O W h O f O• O• it w e i o ... w e W x e ..Na M N O IT1a M. O w { w aN w.hoNN.ewew.ew.hne a000 :NOONNlIOrNP+O NM=wNNISA1xSNa0Olrw r: .wN •aON N TN w {oe..f tleseN.eaeee .aONO :NeweFee)noN {heFaNlNrNMO1~aFw NON.NNNON•OMANPN MMOwN O aNMFw N r N r N N N K A n A N n A N JhNNN.ry+ryMwMaM•~.M ~aKNONNwI+MaP.00NNNaNOh.N.i MK .N•~w•Ir NO +O K•..•FONNwaNa W M:iSwwwlilA V ISS~xaxNN VISSSSMSMSMSINII SI VNIS NxXxXxXtX~:NMNNMN ONNNNNNMNMMNNNNMNNNMNNNMNNNNNNNMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNM W U I 1 1 1 1 1» O. f0 f 1 V a raN N N\\ N. a W 9 N = • NON WN N F N N HWaO N NN J F NWWIN »N / h ` Tfw W V Y aSr• .t h ~n r SV hl+e Y VOVJV>V VO\SSV xW Nt TN.Y TViN NV :V INV~V:VJVOOiNV TY {/ >•N+ :V9=eyV w O YV.• Y Fy1N h3\ f)OOW f \ ~ O S 00•K /i •VfhtlKO fV0 W\ ~yy F by N Y.OyI i• /NI •x Oi/M/ O M i 'J Y fYYV O• iNY J WO VWN F OS > KN~4I\tl •Z KWYKf~p h { ~ ~ WWi> NYiW4xF0.\ ~ O{-L p y 00JO J{2MOY /Zi OSN• V K / i< ONOY ~ <NaWiVJ O O_ONJ ~ WipJ NMJiW>`J N{N J / ' J y K/O >Z~1 _J a_OIJW+ Mf A; ~+ = a N W/KO Na •T)KON NILOF{• y ; ^ i N YY VJiW Vif T Y M J ppNN Oi{ ulWywNW •V Y K JJ9r \O.4<N9hy VYO~J+hr M Y V 3 K { NW 9VOi yyy tt~JJ/./Z aM • K M Y~~6 Ni0{SNJYWO,NSSi~rO •O N u ~ .'e .i. r s w ~ i W Y NS W N V NO •r N i O 0= =KP J W V , aN \S\ i < W O iJ i^:~O Oi WN: f» NLJWWM hM K:O _\iF~~N/{JN ill iYZ 3.6J1W~Nl~fWira6 IyWN JK<WOOaO• s{N W~r.rctlrr x iMii~;HVMaKiiiOi OWM/N'J WO wrN>f4yl ONMON.hVOW x/rVVu O i1LtiNW OfxW r 1~6r{NNO>i ONJY4) H>OJG.jNJt~Y~~O\O w O Y P W r YY :Y W J C u u < i/ e ~ ~iip)N W~ r ~h _N f{YS r „ NI VNi N\PZN N O< N J NV O Z • O W i~• So~e~~ w sa ~ ii Y. r h~H _ W)• Z Y:r Vi WO WNi i NaN y : Z<V S YI •N `O N rV tiMf { YJJ YNr 4i{)Wr N• Y _ O ~1 W • V r N i r W4wJNMWZ• MW iM f n O iaaT OW~~f< rYN) •NN 706) J y ppyyII OW OWf` VrZ\WW W Z WYfW >03WWf. tOr'J ~i0 V.JS 4YVOL OOW00 O • O ~ •>~W J~16JiMM0<SM{ NW\ Y M Z YiV ViOOWW { >r J6 4>J~ Z)N •rZf Y WOeO ~ O • WZW wMtZV Wi~~J ViV{ yy00 '1 ,,1 OJZNVrf. Z O~ i 0 •f»O Y<\ilfW•aOJ ~i rWWJ •VY~W i VJ<WWJii~ O = O O VYOON WV{r<iMrJ O MAW[ IJNaVWW O 1 O tSh JtNM Jf<F /Wf997W iY iNOrYSW•rViyt N 1( V VZV~sN YY WriOiL • Y46Ni MtYt V V V < a r l'if Nr VJttf 4<{rN<WZOOOOY yVWN/JiitOZiZr~ilOi yVl [ r J t O rU60 <a<a.00000VVVVYVVV 0000WWYYYLL6WOL2x a h O O „IMO xaONaNNaONwOPPJNNI NOPw JOaONaaPIrON^I N ^PW ONNnaPNnOr0j0 P+a ONOI.ONONN•aPPwaNN p N P ry a PO VnwN OMOw MMOryNNPNwNrrrr~ N N NN a•N N NNNa aw a •N 7 N° ui mOaOPNFaNO i/•YOOOOf OONON000hNfNNONNaNwimopwN ViJih •OT:ONdioN i+•o wryVOON NI.O :OOnNOFNVNONaONONNVJOONVNNPNO wdiNiNOPNNaNPONNOMVONNM~~~NaOaOMmNFA~OJINVNNFVOAaNM iN MMn000N1•VwN=iy:NOONMVNN„NVNiNFMNOlINlw=NFlV+N:N .n wN •NNNY N N NahNNN +• ~N« N • O V N V ~ inn i u1N 6~ =lO ~O On6 nJV r~ wi V~ p• W• [~ a• W• Jh Y1NOw N_NIN__a MONONNNINaP000JNNINVhONOfNnINOFONONNmIMpn YhhNVO O ~ !!!!lSS~SSS~SSS MwJ 3 'N=NNNNNYNNNY•S SPNSNNNNN Saaa33 333",/iie3a a'.Y ONNMV0INNNNNMNNNNnNMMNhNNNMNNI~•0~1NNIT•N VOiN NNNNNNNNN1101NNNNNNYVi y O • OW 00 e0 V Ynllhl N » M N wh N P „ 9i •NM •1• J 1N \e O O = :f :O JN i NJ ei •>O O ~• h •O ~ \ OYWYN OWY Y\ Ny M Nl NY J 1 O O O >ON •Y =Y \N VF•1 ie We^ NYh N N i NY OJ YOY ~ •O 1 i yW• uL' +~P u a.N+ a i~ia ~i i~on~s So rN~ SS•ji i sis Y W F i JV VO 1\YO N N • J VVW O 1 >O~L F{ i i~N YW ~WiO:V Efr N•l iZV j tj{ _ _Wi O NY _h_ M •J h YNjO iW W =:h N VOhi aJ• wW FW MNyyh{JNa~jW~j OW SFY •ih W W LJ_ NjaJJY >M Y Y~ONWf~iiNTYNO h1o WW Of ~iJf~O a ~WUV nVj V N •\Y NiY• O_NN Y_i N:FJ\IYMYO V _ OS~ iifi•M hN W•>OYOJWOW• VM V WJ 9hh>MjWFYEr > ••~ F •yN \WY ~> hJOyMyLieVYh NNMN O_i WO •W NyOrW Jif~YiVFhNyyYS Ii•f VOPL{•i•f i1i+•~ifONVO~jf •?ri NOJf OJW>FWOJ•a[+Li FN •f Nh~l~~iNF i2?f hjYN ~FaiVif~YYf•N Ni'J N~VOOhWt•i•fWl~f >W i>OW\\MN N{9 {O •• paMNn ryiW 6J h NOVffVE i il[VO OfjO WWOifOVJ{WYiV iYOiVf OY• JuOY~`N6RMaJl rpE UrWia~ OV ONJVfNOfVI JMYiO. OFWOY{W OVi Y VrN JW{ hOhNLhV•V V`f SOVMYWjVJNYhFh NO; JJJJJO WL~jNOj0~Lf OJf yy((9iYJh,rIJJ YpSNY SO Y`O` N\•Y>N •WJ> hWLIV~ lfw~iWYfhFiJY~>f{LOLinfiYOYiONf~~MV~MPiNL~hLeSNtOa{aF i • h O j w f N V • V • r N i F N O J J y~ Y O V N J • • J J N Y rei ~ V 1 J ) J Y ) O • N W jyJ » N p• NV J •f•• V ryY O f F W Sf YW ~YOVpY ;•Y YiN Y i NJ Y u NJ O iM „YVO• VO WNJ\W fD M j JW )n Y N•ii•f OYy>i i)OOi j •SOV N OVY_N • { NO VN • FI NNNrF Yi)W •M iJ NY hN^=f WWhV y i J ` ONWiN NNiWONVJ Of{~Ji a+ppW VOJ irY)Ji iW MiNO •f W~•f )W ~N•NiV ZYJ w•~OrVYnW i•ihf 1~J~•ii~~W W^Wa:rFff Y VSN•O N~ahY)WhOJNYhJ Yh~iON1i\Ni)Y JWLU•j O WY • i•VaW t YW Y M` " WWW_OJOMa •jf raWWrN :YO•YYY VIfOFJ p V N O:Y NN 1 OY +[f •YNfWWJi ••i OiJ rj7RM iJ BYO e ) •JFOS•N fViOVi^Jf •••• ijWfUWJWOONO•Y NWYi •V fN 7>n•• NfV O•h N » OiMNWM000iN WfOfj jY Y•>fp' WPnjj t{h0•N JYYLO+ MhVV~WJiYMNVhYjhWfYW•00 JO ` YW WWWa Y••)OJWW:•fOV i'•YYij hJOWrJjOWWUVfYOif •J:VOOWh)NLIIYO wu 11YMYNJffLiffflLj[f 00{i>LY~iOffifiiYffNNNN w N NfirrlNNNNnNNniNnYOJNNONOrnNnaOawNNMNVNNNOa Ciirr NN/i nr•.wON'MOYVOFNNNwPVNNNPNN101rhVNOOn mi N6 rJNYN•NNANNVn.•nNN INMINNJJO••NNNNhaN NN Nrp^VN V OOwOpONiwN NN00000001MiM000 O.IOOOVONr ihNN00000NN0lONN FlNP>VOOMN iOViNrNO0ii1.NPM wow ~NwN~Ni •N.•IN •wMiNNwVI••N=1 N N A A JrNOMNNINV1.NAiM i1.NNIwNNINOhONOVNN•NVhNN W~~a..:.os^. asssssss.s.s.s:sssss~s3stsss ONNNNNNMNNNNNNNMNNNNNNNNNNNNMNNNNNNMNNN P 4 u v O .I VIw 9iN VII e•e 2) i G •oD p`~~ ~ I i 1 . •i• ••~ •i• t6 •O• ~1~ Wt Iw. . I `>~ `d n i r W =• \ N N V O i1W~N r N WN N i Y'JV W O r O V O VHIL V iV V~1i V OVFW ViV L i V DVI N.1W J ONVi JIO.~UV OV• •NO \ M NONJI. W R iN a bVW VJ•i N b I W i rtf ~ .V i{ r O\j N.~ O VYOOSDI ~f NW \7 \M rIIM 14 j i upeu :NNNi i J!J Ir•e ~ OOOV M O IMVOJ Wi01 VV<W •ibV WWWJ rIJNN O~WWj01•• iiWV Y.Of •O\IN~VitreYMeYO iihJiWJFNV w~i=JOV\rViOf VJJN ~irfr\r>N Iw N!p_rNVW'J i1 =;DLVLYJJN ONN I NNf iOW j f rlV NNOM 9OliiRrNN osri usu II iRf e1~\`WNVruf =JeOf O.WVV ~WOJfV \~I >O \rf OV•iWY MO\iwlr •ONN IL JNO o i 1~ V ~ I. N W Zi i f N . YN D f i : D N €SC .i. +3 .`3 Orr • V f MJ JO i 1 VV O V\ I i jV O rZWNR i )O )W •NWJOO NJ • Ur\ O OVZ WM irN Vr M JiMONOi Jn • •O 9WN. O •r J.ex~WW sa e.N >. NWa~j\ Vp Vfri>WW WV. VO MtOOVF 70 ourDUO\ •1=! rzN D 'uui~. NW J.W. :ul`uiei °s ~iDii Wr rirVf\ J JJZJ(Wr•rOrWl •> JJOVVOrNW• iVVWyf rOiNOiMO i WWr~V VV~•WWO•D~YWf FVi\J NNNNNNNNNN NNMwNNNNNNfMrF'J> .eN• ^nOe b O.ONNV h MrrNNlr11~0 • •i NMON.NN - • O N bb bee ijr ee ua •i • •VN VV V iMY O7p t OJJ~9 V • O NJIii1M NOtM N~iVhrWOi i MrJMWN~NIW rffrN\.W\ ~DiiWwN100 INWV .N Vi ~ r NNO\ swrWr =JiWW VMOW NONlJ\hSWW N9NNWh OrWJwOw>.N OJNW~1 Vier la w•rVOwYOW iNNOrNiO•O 8 ! ... JV WV J V ir. Baia NiVWNr.N /MiihWiOZ IJMJ~ ..~f NCO p• YO~VOJY .`I iriiiiu~i. VVirVOiYf WNWjMiRW< N NJNMiWWrW >)ii~rNNMN nOPI1N F0 O O•III ONnwO• wAOINI wO O• n•h•ilMw NNNOiNONrV OwNw10rIMw NOw•NN Nn wiOJNip. ONhNl1N NNNw NN NNNN a.IN w NN NNNN NT JN nE V~ <~ N~~ \YO O• W• <• O: i~ O V <YP m u<N K0 Vi0 3W0 f0„ pNK pj> V LL ~ b ~ 1 NOappppmOOMOmOPi00 NrrO PONAN00000o000a00 N OOn1,NPOPfPe00POONO~~ma~mJ ~ 0 NJNPOOOnNNO00PONn NP PO<OmNO~Jn y T • ~ OM ^m<NnN enINHNd~NOwTwNNIr~OPCPNNMNJN bmNrPNm~n • N N M •• N ~; F ~ N ~ A A n PJ ~ •• • OMNIrI<NaMiPONNI1PpaPPPO••Nlrl<e'Fh'O NNNJNbNNNN ~ n n ~ p amPPP 1~ =i JMnmetiNNaFmP urNNNNNNN upiwnl"Iila woeo<moouoa~aa~ aamaiaa Papaar°. jrrrY O1 NNNNNyIN NNNNNNY1 ~lIm NNNNN VINNNNNNNNNN PI p. eNNNlo~ennnlNlrm memeemmmmsmmmmememmmeafinememmamm < 3i u 1 If 1 • f sN W ie NWeu NJ x m > P n 4J N P ~ V w N la N J Oa i ~ • V~ MOtJ DN 7 ylm p LL V 1 N y. a 1 •Sn r< <N< ' • Y N N mN Z M ~ M OPiZ 3Nw 6DPNLLNN hit iWN Wiv ~ ~ YLL W J S MnYWLN y ~ UV WN mi 3 NJNON~ ZWfY• ZW_\iOmANny iKV\YrNV 1 ~ V VryMV ee IW•[ >N W Mn<LLPTFWJiii i NNiP\Lrr rW!NJm rP m< Y~ fie NN < \ y ~ ~ YV J OW~ONN\PW3~W ~~pWWrmNNpNe LLU709N y Jn<ON NVMN06NNWOpO000Nd6NilmOrv <6rr i O Vi ~LL NNJ VMO SPOOLL\NN 1 y mDmLLwyOW ~ • LL F MLL <O lwOJ3fmmeNLLYFFnW< Z=NOw WSVp~00000NOiLL{LL D J~• M YJ FJW NLLVNLLDO=pZ7W •nW OMKm >J =rye[ 1- •F• Wj H CmDmN WpY WIL M Y.pRUipWNiCyF06 VuLL J6 WLN~Ww •>• W yjeOLJf W~nieOiWiLLiNiOY~N N~TZOi•yraWrii6nV < •n• WZ __ y W y{J6J Otl uMiWYrn'rUpf~>l J•yi~UOV~~OfO i6• W`UKKVCwf MRNYJ ~'H~ G > V < m00 • JN zLLZJJ _ • W fl J r0<IWJWJ6<MNOYIM Y YLLWLL f~Wf<WK~O> am OC• y Y WiOZLLOpLL {VOLmoJLLO LL~im piLLOW01' r Li, W f N Y PNOJNOITLZ>O\N610nmORLLLLJ ~i i e iW i:~e iiLL .. ~ i 0 i c ~ s Ni ..i- i N IJ. i aW i~ ~ W J N JO >V ~ ~ 6 LL ~ N < W• W 6 C tt • • J D P J ~ f W ~ Wip W W y i+ j • D O LLLL u2 < ~m Jl LL UWN iu Z Jm Wi ~ u Y ~^Y W >3 yI+ i f ~ 0 1 lw•Wi NY >3O~WWt w~WWiLL wu>n oZ WriiR o ~ y yO Z WV WO aPJ ~ ~ N W is WWD'mJ LL 7Wf OY`hyW fp' LV YU fKM•rl r[TOOO 3Qy'J R4 <ND~ ~ a ILO f ~VitWrwiJOmy • 6J ~ • • < JRp iO O JjN My 3W •I NOOiNiWwN• ~OyW ~ aJ PN •iVJO~SW<•S OyNiN_IN d~LLHV Zf ~yy<W06D0 ~ ~ W M O• OTHwNVOiJ JiiylYN3 fWf WSNNJJJ006 i WDWWNNJOVO<ZyfiND6yDimPPDYLL~ « ~<~ ~f~ ~ ~ i~ <~~~~~~~~t~~~jPO0ee0000apOeVUJJUUUUVJUVVVVVJ Na •Z~ N N m •IJNVN Pa~~NtiPtiO~<oN"IaNnJNNOnT ~ eNmJJJ N^I°NiNN pm rI°rvalPVO 'n"'0mb~ r Ne ae°a ~NNr mr-F.c.J~iJOam J:lNaaaa~ ici n bN N •o• N w .w • • / E E Vt t 41 1 h 0000N10N 01.OO.INONNOOOONPTOOOOOONOOOONONr~lOOr100 nOOTPOOOVONVNA00NNONNO000NwO00ooowry0000PNNPOOW00 tit : ~ Pt{t I rNaVrwONOOmawNOTNOTONOONOONN00.00NanOaPPOhaNONwNhI \t J~INNwVJrI•TNOPNPnPOaNnJNNONNnOwNOw wVwwNTmNwmmmmnT» VM WN mN Va N w w NwV N N Ot>t N W~ Ot Zt pt s P t JNOhOPOwNTVNOnOPO NTVNmI•gPOwNTJNLn>IPOMNTaNO NaN w t2 t N^^'TM1m'MwIT mTa •JfJ.I .IVNNNNNNNNNNOOVVVNN000i•hhnhn I•M11•hl•hr Al•1•hhl•hhYnYnnnhhhh nl•nnnhl•nhhn nl•nhn m000ggO00gOqqO00mqOq•OOggOgq0000qqO00CmmmYOmm NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN t>t ••q •_•f• •• • i Z i• h S V fN O P P <N V¢ V \P P TS TS O N P\ O Y •{ O N \ \\ P NO SNm \ 1 l i\ N NNN \N Vw 00 N ~ P ~ q N• N\ •MM \ _ paw N ON O\J 1\ 1wN n m N r\ 21• M•w • { nl• I • P \O p O\\ VJ n ¢ SNP PY • \WO PWpn •Y6• 1\ ZJ ~h J WWNO N w NO t-m pmOp O\2 I Nso •Z VSIH• JmMW<JZOI N N\P 1 N p WN \wrJ PVOMW p O p ~ wINL JnN \ • LL112 JiWJN•6PfJ\mnJC•J I F a[ I JW P \Y i nZ p\mpt •tWLL J pYOW \Wm< Z\w OiJf wlNl•Em mfNi ¢ f WUO~• j6UN ~iN FOWNNp Owu pVJZ y i i OiOO pUW M NSW 22 NW nWZp 1 0V f\~ \ID IhwU ¢ V u0 tot Zf ofp¢ON msW SW<pV Vi ¢1011¢ONw VNme J wVa2 60ew Wq2 MO OI J¢V IPwSO ODSD N 2 Op •20WN W nO0 PiWW11 1 >tWpY yhWLLJLOWp\6NSLLhSNpW N tht JImJ¢b Y. ly¢I¢•V OUwOJ{Op2NpmLL000 YLL wLY2V6it0¢w ILL JOSLLOZW LLV6pLLw OW O O N Yi ¢ <VMY. NVW 6WF O\IF WJ p O g U~ tLJ W•1Wf< hFNff• LY. •Y 2YLLYSY01 m 2rv Z'JSLL2 {UY¢ N UJ¢>¢Sm•iY1N W¢ oLLf Z1-OiOf ON pJ N OJ•Wii u{w0¢ fON Z Y.SYO •SJ •N WYO .2Ni2pL z N u fn OihVa I y wJW NpVJWUJOY 00¢2 OLiO~w0• {SN «6YN{• f0<O¢ u fVV JiONNZw nJrpJWOW¢VVi< 0¢pJVSVpf p tZ WiiP JOhS J{I¢ UOSSY IWT<1¢{ ON ~m LLJi¢f2p20MVNLLUrfLLZLL~LL6NpJiNWZVWT TON<S TLLPpY O'.~ LLJw• OWO<WOWLLO <LONO>NOYfrJfYWJrt6>w<WZi PimO¢i>Op» LLf~Nq¢NUJNTOf6wVWfLLPOLLN06N60p¢pWpO•OKMWM h V O h J V D ~ Z < N ~ N < u f o w ~$~ i JaIN-ef u N ¢2 ry S ff 2 Vh wD N VV J JVSY 0Z Ym J6 V Z YO¢JJ O 2• <VWY NZ• DiD J• i •NN y aD LO WRf VwW w6 22ww¢wVJ• ¢VwJ JU E<6 ap0 M1NVM¢i aO~if VJ W¢~1S{W h~-I{fNZN %SVOYOii2w¢MN¢OS~i ~OwwY ~J 20LLVi t W O NiV{MNWN VILWI• ONJOWY1t•f V m _ _ w1w• ¢_i_• JJ{V • Opi OFI• w wOJJh ppZ • IwpW6M • 20 Yf •Vff• y26< 7Yf h¢N N¢i ONI ihNfNOZOt .f ZN fCFWfWwY<hhhWVW M202SLSwWWWT• WOiN VONWVfYi¢hMOWwJJw ¢1•JUWNS{n0 tt2¢W¢VUVLLJZNNwY •i¢ f tit J2pFUW2ONJWOOJJWO22m62fwwOw Ull¢T ¢mLLJJ¢ » Y3VOVW ft {JLWWWwJJOOff O¢¢ WOOODOOON9> 0 2t 000000000000WWYILLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLUOVVVVU'VSSLSSSLSSSSSSZZZLZMw t¢t NamoPNnnma! mVa+ma <NOPNTP OTmmmnm mNmatawnPhwnOONmnPwnN ' FNNwNVNfTJOV NNVTTwmTnrNrwePON t2t NmPaN N.anO aaN OJNNJrN NNVwrwNNTN wm 1TiNNrrniw T•wfwTVmrrw.IN TV.aNJ• • t II E ii •: 6/ C: i; mPnmPeeaeemaeNneeeeOeNOOeePePOegweoooeeemepeoneeeoe OmOONO0a00MaON0000NOONO00aNONOONONO000NNIN :NwNONOON OhannVONONtlhNV10NONOV NOnaOwNVgNNNwO<OPNNtlaNmmONwP N~OPNmOtlnNhINwNNwOVyNNN1o'N~NNtlmNN^tln^tl~w~M M'OwwNNNV aOP N n MV N Jtln"OwNnVNVNOPOwNnINpO pN Opppw NnaNVh Op OwNnVNtlhOPONNnVNtl LLh h1~1~I~AhhAA FI~~Frrh All`hMeOSOSSSSSS000~0~0~lSOOOSSAV oNNNNNNN0000m000000000000ma00g000000000000000000p000 NNNNNNNNNNMNNMNNNNNNNNNnNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNM t P IN VSm ZmN U 0 010 Vi OO LLM ~ , L Lit •2• pL •O• eL 2L i ii m w N O P N \ OON P P NOO P \ \ V NPN h i anN O N \N \\ N NNNP M q i \ \PNN h Nh f!i OU mGi m gNSi U w\WW 0 O I MJZW WJNM _ LLbWS V \ ~GNw OH OwOw y II JfIN Izzf o[z \I ii ifiNiz wpJ WJ \F pl •f OUWO~~fiwWKNWC:Q ~wwm ~01 ff Wnnm uN6Nf _V O_ n:NLLwZNOLLLLai6 w,0066 G\LOL• WmWO ~J iN mp ONihJN M 2\WO 1[SMF J~100\1 fV YOmKNils WIUIh h m0 W y mW110 O 00\ OOfwSOO~OiFF ON N'J f I VWF mfLLhiJOihhOJ00 NhW\WOhJh 0~~6 OLLhNWSG __ 60J UUZfiNW6mWLL2wU1.OVmUIVIVVOUNOh hOJhuw6V fONB6 JNLNN037 J y007 M NVSw9 ~i~ZNY 6 N120ILLh::OWNO LLOUw~1 W I1n 00' VJ: Om 6 7 hZ OwZO0i1 0~< UUfhhWNwVN NLLJwih Z MwhLLhhO COZY N2 ilw h riWOfi\W J 2JNNmh62 6_ ~J0 NLNL JNONwNNOOZW 6 WW ipN U OIIVVSU NJNhZa J n OfpSV2gSSV •JiLL:Wi6• WSS<OOfWOw <MwWVU~m YLwJ wwwNwNfwmfiJhf FUf OUN JUZNV7N62201.ZJ JL~Z Nh NOJVW mJhJWJJJFV6iOf6thVZ i00fmJOh27ffhfOZ hU<Ohf w1[NSt Vf Uf lG JS~f hm6Zi JT• ZSWiWUhWY. IL NLLZ20 CwOh UNSNZSWf Z SVZZ 'JfWOOO yWy HwhLLf2 LL>JNL~60RYUfZLLLL000igGNNqGI'jLL7iVNIL NIL V011L INL IN~If ~ONpppNLLOiCLL O h V V 2 J S Y Of ~ w o F t ~~ Y JI- V h i N Y u J V V m 1[ O O> Z 0 VWw ~ p mfS h yy JL<W• 6uYiw IWn< h itiNiwww fJ 'Jhh mJ WLJZF'ry OwO N3 SU7U• O?• wJ<fmWVJ {~ WOVJSfO WOOwUWL6 WNJL<OYiI<Nm000M ~i SZ JV• •Ua ~zh _ i SN J'muJiW V V Z=6 Ou OhZN~Owi uWi2YJSNy OMNfq~~<y f Ohi00hyNS Niw oU NO• ZNIyJJLI• IZOS Jpp •N VV61fW~uV¢xijONar11J--w WJ wyy2 OZJMFxfwj~ylOIOWJJS~VNUNL6L O_VJJi ~JJSm;hmJVVw Y gwwy;WwWi f<wwNNOOO~sV< <iiLLNffyyUWWNgwO<fyWfIMJ wM IY KYWYJJJJJJJJJJJZZZiLiZLLLZSiZiiiLiZiZZLLO NaNNNn• nNnnOtlNtlaNNhNhO~mr~hOwNn P.nNnwhwVN 'IP NNNOwMOmnNOwONObMPNP NOPnaNONNNmmPNNN n n~i~Nwa NaaVwN mmN 'I NNaNNN~m NIIINNNanNa• NNIN /~ f V iNP im Uml S> mVm pJG h o .; V1 Y~ ~Z \~< m~ \• mY< tY O' w~ VI 0; 2/ ~• 6/_ O~ ~V~ :a: •H1 NhOOnNNOOmpN0m0000A0000000NONO00000NO00N ~mONOONO T100NN NNpNrOONOONOTOOhOOONV OONOOnNOON NmhOONh NPONOVNIVO>hNNVNOMN00 OPN OPIIpbVhNONObON • P<NON N• OIPNmwHpONOmNOPbyNOn.iO nw1 NIN~PMVVN<NeN~ • NNNP « NN NMN •ONNNNT mrlN VNNN.INN N NN P N ~ N N N N n n N p n Jnm NAVN'O hOPO<MOIV NONmPONNNbNbnmPO~NNbNbhON<NbnmPOH N:eaa::e:::~::s:aas:ass:::::me:x:;asas~~aa:s::o:mam ii•mmmemmeeaemmmmeeeeaoeeooeeemeeomoeeeemoeeoaaoommm ONNMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN a fhP • ••• f • I•If • ON P J PO b N NV p 4 00 RW 2 76 N VV RWw U Vh ~ ~~ N fmNU PJ Vu NJN Vi PLL IUh ~ 'ZVJ J02 LLW6 Z<ZZO i O w0 G NOy•MOO7 •iV0 O~4 LO O eL\f ~N USNmti VWtlul 1~ wRLLJU2VV6N G •Si m> 6YH60 O i20V1 •J PO<OON>i0 NW iOU V 4 pN O SOOZ 1 Jw W~ZOUVW~OOS~NLLN>VOVMWZ iMW JO 2V WWVVIOD wmOOZ D<NO LLLL E6V< ii~p00 'J' wp VOOOLL LLmOWWLLO JVfNW ni<6 im Wi6mi h Wh< WOMVUOZpUO7NS t2JVOLLW2 i• VO >V IIMh>7p2 1 zYVN WO JW Ni~sNVl i < W =NLLww O 21WWJ NuWw:WWr°•w<hWD h~ aJ~W,v M~ssMimy ^•WnE ~.:.~ 1 ~MJW>OYa OIOV NINLOLLLLNNUiUmM>OLLNNOOD SIL ONVZLLVVO < 26YOVOV v r u u ¢ z V W ¢ M Y S V N H O J O mNZN V V J Y ¢ N O iKOw OJ VF Y. MV <O SJ J VmOZ 00 EO LL p { NU 6 Dm <O Y tlm NO 1 2 <i< mNa U YNf>V2 U EO OZWSY ( ZNWOYVwH NWO NWm YUfE N wi mJn VOY O O D DSMY.NNNJ NZm• ~~ 1J JZN wJ NY00< iW1m.iZ~~F wZNwUtNFw Vew oyW fSWOiti O<W~iSOV VNGw <YO~ UjtSmWYVi 3 W±J6V0< m'NVmN W W V< <S~VZW JtN>DO w« Z~[• WJ M• mi00 ONOi •ZVVNV Nw• E •K w~Q< SJVVNO• mON •OOLLrOiNN<m mOY22N UW Q6iiJN •O pDN20ELLNpV{ NLLWWOO J JNw wOh m200LLVhWUZm w__O U_VV JtfY¢ZwWw ~W _J 6__O JwOV6ZOFM U UWZfOYZD EZ~<UVN>OVVJJ JEOwENmNH <WW<m OOOm¢V m<e< NO « < «VUwWeYii 004nVVim OOp66GppOCYYi6mOm0606zpONNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN N NNNNNNNV TFO<., eh0 O'On N.1NFmnP TVnmPOmN NOPOmNNNNJ N <NPNHnm N NNNNNINIINNNNNNn N NmNNNNNrvNNN NNTN NNN H NNNNN 13 ONO OOOOONOOOOOOOOOOfONO000NOON00 P OfO :ON0000000POONmO00PNOPNO N POOONMNMNOIOONAfNhNOONNmPNmnn10N NN O NN%rnN{nNN N P H YNNN o V i fio ~<N ¢1 S>O OjC ~ ~ • ~ •i• ~z• i¢i )S; N N N JNn{NOMOPOwNw1.INNphp~eP COC ppN pQN VI ~peI CCN pp QQM ppm Pp ONN ~Ome~iO~00~~~O0Y~OpPpRPPPTPPPPP OOetleeO0e0000000000ee000000e00 ONNNONNNNNNNNNnNNnNNNNnNNNNNNNNN V ee O J u u o{r i Wi Y N iMtp W t~O Ni P fi0\ 12 o WuP li nu PO ~. Nlm sh P N\ OW L U ~ih V% w WI SFS\NV~Wn¢ J 200 6 NS IN ~¢ehOe2i F JW O F tl 1 P IL 2 J~ J Z hmifuiioNe z> > OOO CSO •S ONW~Ji.Oi ¢uNi Oy w W v+IN m¢N OI OFWfNOWJJry2yNi22NO OF FP_ O NO ¢VWUI WIL LAY Y\NJOWI• SN FJ JW W~Y~OJ¢ if iW¢O.~ OO S6 L: SJW •f NO So LLJNINOyWLWi SNLLh'J OLL \yNUBYOJIN WO h~JiWN ¢ K2KSWLL¢W JWOFN¢nOLLweW¢h0•fONnhi~O d%¢Mx oVffVf MHO O:wOeNiUNLLI MW S{VfNOUnnWhONW¢~NONONOOOOmtn>fN Nzuo zf..u¢NNioPwoLL s Nyneyie{N LINlNLLJ6NpY0Wty~HF>Yy~iO~+N~W2iWUnNU hF iiva a N N fo. RN N L W Il V O V W O NJ h% Vf OJJ{ wNfh NU{{O iii VU { Yh06 OWV •2 JOINSwWNhWO wi0{ ¢{ 7J WNhOWW ZOJn SWJ NNiynn{NO NWVMN~ fi OWJ { N OW 00 NJ WZ ULLOO¢i{¢a JZ• i¢i¢ niOyifUmOhnf)NOV{JhNMFFFFFhO f ____M_S22NNF%NNNNMh{~' V <fN WLN nhHFFFFFOJ'» JOP>aai2yZZZiiZZxNN d/Iho mfrvmpOPyOOPwmhOhlhlOhy mIw VoN NCO NNm NNm NN NNNNN mN rv N m mN / / --- CITY OF RANCHO CllCAMO NGA ,.,. STAFF 1tEPUR,T ~'"~ DATE: September 4, 1991 T0: Mayor, Members of the City Council and Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director ov. .... :.... n v....... o.....w.,..:.,,, e....... ........ ... ..... . ...v.wuuy.y..m ~ SUBJECT: REQUEST TO SURPLUS VEHICLES That the City Council declare as surplus property two (2) city vehicles and authorize their sale at public auction. The City has received replacement vehicles authorized for purchase in the FY90-91 budget, prior to the freeze on fixed assets. In addition, the vehicles for surplus are now too expensive to maintain and no longer efficient to run. The vehicles that were replaced and must be surplused are as follows: UNlT YEAR lL1AKElMODEL VEHICLE ID NU!dBER 104 1985 Ford/Crown Victoria 1 FABP43F2FZ108383 1983 ChevroleVMaiibu 1G1AW69A3DR165746 As we have in the past, arrangements will be made to dispose of these vehicles at public auction. We would be happy to answer any questions you may have. Respectfully submitted, ~~ Jim Hart Administrative Services Director JH/JAWmem ~J - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA S~AF~ RESORT DAZE: September 4, 1991 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager S[JBiECI': AQoroval of Cily'e Cha of oets in Fines nd ForfeiRros T.awAlllt Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the expenditure of 51,740.00 from account 0t-4285-6028 for our share of the ongoing costs associated with the Court Fines and Forfeitures litigation. Background: The City Council has authorized the City to participate in a lawsuit with other cities in San Bernazdino County to challenge the method for distributing and the amounts of fines and forfeitures given [o cities from the county. The 51,740.00 is to cover the City's proportionate share of the professional fees for the auditor and legal counsel retained on behalf of the cities. The total amount expended for the professional services to date is still within the original range submitted when these professional services were contracted. It is recommended that the City Council authorize expenditure of the funds to keep the City involved in a process that could have a positive impact on our revenues once the case is resolved. pectfully S muted, ~- ~~--~ /6 urrx ur xnrvvriu cuunmurvun STAFb' REPORT '' ~. DATE: September 4, 1991 -~ T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Michael D. Long, Supervising Public Norks Inspector SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO FILE CLAiM NITH SANBAG FOR LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND ARTICLE 3 REIMBURSEMENT FOR ARCHIBALD n'r Enui JlIKRM.aJ rrinu it ivv llU~emtN1S ANU 118 INYON STREET SIOENALK IkPROVEMENTS It is recoemended the City Council authorize staff to file a claim with SANDAG for reimbursement of funds expended from Local Transportation Fund Article 3 which originates from TDA Pedestrian Facilities Funds. BACKGROIIID/A1W.YSIS Council approved the subject projects for construction in Fiscal Year 1989/1989. The projects have been completed. E1lgibie expenditures have been made from Local Transportation Fund Article 3 accounts for the Archibald Avenue Sidewalks Phase II Improvements and the Tryon Street Sidewalk Improvements in the total amount of 572,840.00. Council authorization 15 necessary to file this claim. Reimbursed funds are to be placed in Fund 16, Pedestrian Grants, Article 3. Respectfully su tted, ~~~ Nm. Joe O'Neil City Engineer NJO:MDL:,jh Attachment ~7 The San Bernardino Counfy Transportation Commisslpn SAN 9ERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS ~ AF,.A":^!!NGC!+IINGii.OF CvCP~R.^,T.!^!G !N?ERACfIVE GOVERNMENTS 472 North Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, Ca!ibrnie 92401 (714) 86a-62)6 FAX (714) 6654407 -'- \ July 10, 1991 Ms. Debbie Liang Accounting Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Local Transportation Fund (LTF) Arttcte 3 C.iaiw Dear Ms. Liang; Enclosed is a partially complete LTF Article 3 claim form for the Archibald Avenue Sidewalks Phase A and Tyron SlreebJadeile Avenue Sidewalk Projects. Please complete the claim by :1) Identifying the actual project cost and the amount of LTF Article 3 needed on the Project Information Form, and 2) The total amount requested for both projects on the TDA Article 3 Claim Form on the Request Payment From Reserves. (NOTE: The actual amount of LTF Article 3 the City is eligible to receive is the original amount reserved or the percentage of budgeted LTF Article 3 to the total cost, whichever is less.) You may wish to have Pau! Rougeau sign the ceniflcation statement on the Project Information Form. The City Manager or Chief Financial Officer should sign the authorizing signature portion of the TDA Article 3 Claim Form. You will also need to obtain governing body authorization to file the claim. This may be done through minute action or resolution, whichever is preferred. Please reborn the completed claim form along with the governing body authorization as soon as possible. I will forward the claim to SCAG who will then issue an allocation instruction authorizing the disbursement of funds. Should you have any question, please feel free to contact me at (7I4) 884-6276 SincerelAy, Michael Bair Deputy Executive Director CRC0710. MAB to CITIES OF ADELANIO. BARSTbN, BIG BEAR LANE. CNINO. COITON, FON.nNn GNANV TERRACE. HE SPERp„ HIGHLAND, LCMA LINRA, MON ICI NR NEEDLES. ONTARIO RANCHO CUC/,MONGA. REDUN05 R4U0. SAN PE N1nn OV10 iwENiYNIIIE PALMS, VPUND, V6rOHVILLE YUCAIPn ftYNN Of /,PPLE VALLEY LOVNI V pF 5AN BERNARpINU sAN eLr.NARDINO AssorlATeD ct,vs~Na:>:Nrs; ' COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COh1MISSION TDA BICXCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES CLAIM SB 82I (Article 3) CHECKLIST OF 1TED1S TO BE FILEU Claimant: eiry of Rancho Cucamonga pate; The ilemc rhvvSrHl h.ln.v e _ __ ~i_~e,i ;,, _~...~,,,;..~n ~.w....G eiaiw uiui i~aein: ~. 1. Article 3 Claim Form See instructions for completing the form in the instruction package. x 2. Governing Body Authorization Submit a copy of a resolution or minute order. See SCAG TDA Guide Section 1.4.2. _~ 3. Project Information Form See instructions for completing this form in the instruction package. ~~ SAN BERNARDINU ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENI~S! COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AICVCLF. AND PEhF•CTR.!AN FACILlT1ES PROJECT YIV FORM1tATION FORbI Claimant City of Rancho Cuc amonza Uate; July l0, 199t County LTF: San Bernardino CERTIFICATION: I certify that the information on this Project Informatlon From is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. / Signed: f (Name & title) C PROJECT BUDGET AND ACTUAL EXPENDITURES 1. PlOject Name; Archibald Avenue Sldewalka Phase LI Project Expenditures: '~ Budget Actual TDA Article 3 (SB 82t) $ 35,000.00 $ 3s,ooo.oo TDA Article 8 $ $ Other $ 55,786.00 $ La,aoe, 96 Total Project Revenues $ 90,786.OO $ 49,408.96 2. Project Name: Teton Scree[/Jadeite Avenue Sidewalk P toi ect Project Experditures: Budget Actual TDA Article 3 (SB 821) $ 39,000.00 $ 3~,aao.6s TDA Article 6 $ $ Other $ 19.777.00 $ 2.03 Total Project Revenues $ 57,n7. oo $ 37,842.68 3. Project Name: _ Project Expenditures: Budget Actual TDA Article 3 (SB 821) $ $ TDA Article 8 $ $ Other $ $ Total Project Revenues $ $ 4. Project Name: Project Expenditures: Budget Actual TDA Article 3 (SB 821) $ $ TDA Article 8 $ $ Other $ $ Total Project Revenues $ $ "1 SAN tf4KNAKU!NU ASSOCIATEC GL'VE;;`:"1EN'1'S; COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COM11AtISS10N BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PACILITI ES TDA ARTICLE 3 CLAIM FORM FISCAL YEAR: 1991-92 UA'fE: Clcy of Rancho Cucamonga Clfy of Rancho Cucamonga %vuiv i i LTF• tLiaimant) SAN BERNAItDINO P.O. Box g07 (Alailing Address) Rancho Cucamonaa. CA 91729 (City, State & Zip) nt~. n e~snf~e..L~,,,,nrr~~~.,~aar (Attention - Naine & Title) (7l4) 989-1851 (Contact Person -Phone p) REQUESTED ALLOCATION: AAtOUNT: $ REQUESTED PAYMENT FROM RESERVES; AMOUNT: $ ~z,a4o.oo CONDITION OF APPROVAL: AUTHORIZING SIGNATURE: Approval of this claim and payment by the (CLAIM1fANT'S CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR County Auditor to this claimant are subject OR FINANCIAL OFFICER) to monies being available, and to the ~ provision that such monies will be used (J~ only in accordance with the allocation ! inswctions. , (Signature) (Print Name & Titie) CTC USE ONLY Date approved Signed CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SB'AFF REPdIi,T DATE: September 4, 1991 ~~ TO: Mayor end Members oP the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director HY: Tarry L. Smith, Superintendent of Park Planning and Development SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AWARD AND EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT FOR THE HERITAGF. Paau nnr rrvrcrn ,^.,^,j;Oynliuir rxW CCT WITH THE MARINA CONTRACTORS, INC., IRVINE, G. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council award the Heritage Park Ballfield Project Agreement to Marina Contractors, Inc., Irvine, G, as the lowest responsible bidder and autF.orizy me Maycr and city Clerk to execute the contract document and the Administrative Services Director to expand $132,806. (bid $120,733. plus lD& contingency) to be funded from Park Development Fund, Account Number 20-4532-9106. BACKGROUND/ANALYS I3 On August 23rd bids were received for the Heritage Park Ballfield Improvement Project to include upgrade of existing lights, outfield turf renovation, correction of the drainage problem along third base line and Pine grading the infield area. Eight bide were received, with the low bid being presented by Marina Contractors, Inc., Irvine, G, for the sum of $120,733. A summary of the bids received is provided in Exhibit ~~A^ which is attached. Staff has reviewed the executed contract documents, bonds and insurance and found them to be complete in accordance with the ~COntractrproposal. submitted, Development Director Attachment as Exhibit "A" y 2 W W^ J~ Q^ n~ ~N 9 ~, <' QJ mW YQ Q~ ao ~m F C W_ i ~ i ~ i i O 0 O C p O ° C O w 0 c ~n o o e m n o ^ o o M o m n 0 °o N M ~ I101 IMf1 0 b N M N M N N M ~ °o °o o° °p °p o °p °o ZQ W p. b O o O N - N (J N o m G p o J Q y~ O D i n m m P UMI M O o uo~ W " ~ _ d W p N Q M Q W p O O O O O 2 w 1O m M O N °rv N Ip e a 'u 2 W ~ - N n V N N Q W O O O O O O Q Q W O W N q 0 d G N N q 0 6 p O O O m (/~ n YMI O O d M N Gm V O C u' O o C Z p U V ` V E C W _ ~ ° ~ ¢ yj g J £ a E ~' ~ a g O ~ $ a y - ~ E W 3 m W ~ A r$ N M d N g n P P N a3--------., CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REYURT ~' ~' GATE: September 4, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Nett, City Engineer BY: Millie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FOR CUP 91-13, LOCATED ON 9567 8TN STREET JUtlN1IItU tlT MALIGN J. NGhh ANU ~ItYGN t. MANAN It 1s recomaended that the City Council adopt the attached resoiutton accepting the subject Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien .agreeme^t ..nd ..uthor!ztng the Mayor and the City Clerk tc -',ga sa1E agreement. BACKGROIMD/A1W.TSIS CUP 91-13, located on 9567 8th Street between Archibald and Nell man Avenues, 1n the General industrial District, Subarea 3, of the Industrial Speclftc D1 an, was approved by the Planning Commtsslon on July 10, 1991. The Developers, Nalter J. Neff and Steven E. Mahan, are submitting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement to guarantee the installation of the required street Improvements and parkway landscaping at a later date until improvements are constructed on adJacent properties or further development of this property. A copy of the agreement 1s available in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, `~--~0~ 1zc,Q Nm. Jce O'Neil ~~ City Engineer NJO: NY:,j h Attachnent a~ RESOLUTION N0. C~, ' ~.~"~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM WALTER J. NEFF AND STEVEN E. MIIHAN AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, adopted Ordinance No. 58 on February 21, 1989, to establish requirements for construction of public improvements in conjunction with building permit issuance; and e;i~nw, in, Lal ~e i.i vn vi 6i~e required street improvements ana parkway landscaping established as prerequisite Lo issuance of building permit for CUP 91-13 has been met by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Mal ter J. Neff and Steven E. Mahan. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. i W Q J J Z ~~ D J Q m V NO SCALE CITY OF RANCHO CtlCAMONGA ENGN~EERMVG DIVISION mom; 9567 8rH sr. EXHIBIT: ~~A •~ a~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONUA STAFF REPORT -~ DATE: September 4, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Q Jack Lam, AICP, Ctty Manager i1 FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, Ctty Engineer BY: Phillip Verbera, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF NAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPORVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MRINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING IMINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT N0. laaaa I M~TCn IT TYr lMrcOO GT rn euen nr , rWN wr,n,r •un i aaw,u ._ .. , --....-- ... ...- ~--...~..... .......... ... ~....... ......... ..... ~........n AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY THE PENNHILL COMPANY RECOMENMTION It 15 recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract No. 14866, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 and authorizing the Mayor and Lhe Ctty Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause Bald map to record. ANIILVSIS/BACKGROIRm Tract No. 14866 located at the southeast corner of Lemon Avenue and London Avenue in the Residential Development District, was approved by the D1annTng Commission on July 11, 1990, for the division of 8.7 acres into 47 single family lots. The Developer, the Pennhill Company, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements 1n the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: ;737,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: ;368,500.00 Monumentatlon (Cash): S 4,700.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. A Letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga County Mater District. The Consent and Maiver to Annexation farm signed 6y the Developer 15 on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully sudnitted, (\~~~~ Mm. Joe O'Neil City Engineer Y~JO:PV:dlw ttachments ~~ RESOLUTION N0. R{ - ~`J V A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CItt OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL IMP OF TRACT N0. 14866 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 14866, consisting of 47 lots, submitted by The Penh111 Caepagy, Subdivider, located at Lh! southeast corner of Lemon Avenue and London Avenue has been submitted to the Ctiy of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as prov ded in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; arM NHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the F1na1 Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted Derewlth for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufflclent improvement Securitiy, and submits for approval Bald Final Hap offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Celtfornla, as follows: That sa14 Improvement Agreement be and the same 1s approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk 1s authorized to attest thereto; and That said Improvement Security 15 accepted as good and sufflclent, sub,~ect to approval as Lo form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and That the offers for dedicntion and the F1na1 Map delineating same De approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the cert'.flcate thereon on behalf of sold City. ii i a~ RESOLUTION N0. ~;- ~JFj A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, GLIFORNIA, OPDERING THE ANNE%ATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE NAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. ' 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 14866 WHEREAS, the City Councii of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously forced a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Dart 2 of the Streets and H/ghways Code of the State of California, said special maintenence district known and deslggnoted as landscape Maintenance ni.trgr u„ i er.~mr ~inhrtnn Nainrnnance Dtstrlct No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 7herelnafter referred to as the "Maintenance Dtstrlct"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Llghung Act of 1972' authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District: and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council 1s desirous to take proceedings to annex the DroPerd described on Exhibit "A' attached hereto and incorporated hereto by this referenced to the Maintenance District; end WHEREAS, eli of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the Lity Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NOM, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislat/ve 6ody hereby orders the annexation of the proper y as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B' attached hereto to the Maintenance Dtstrlct. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including die Tvy of all assessments, shall be applicable Lo the territory annexed hereunder. L, ~~ ~-9 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER I ~J ~~ 1D~'1 Lf/MFi./,$ S7CEET UyNT (/7EACN~ ~ E1k41'ry{~~ M4W ~ai4 iTLfl7 TLLE (49 Epe11) - 0 L1QIJI~M~AF STYt4pIF 01.14 p/yiWµ.~ SiKri tte[ (II EACH!) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TAT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 14ea~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA L64EVD E11FII8I7 °8° PROJECT NAIE: TRACT 14866 N0. OF D.U.: 41 N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 41 units STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of Lain s to be Annexed District No. ~ J_ ~_ 1 -'- --- --- --- --- 2 17 _-- _-- ___ ___ LANDSCAPE IMINTENANCE DISTRICT Coaaunlty Turf Ground Cover Trees District No. Street Neae Epuest.Traft Sp• ft• Sp. ft. Ea. 1 Leeson Ave. --- --- 6054 52 Via Esperanza.5t.--- --- --- 19 Cal le Elegante --- --- --- 18 Celle Heneoso --- --- --- 23 London Ave. --- --- --- 8 PV:9/4/91 ~r ~ri~z yr xniv~nv c;v~nmvivvv %~- STAFF REPORT ~. , DATE: September 4, 1991 ~:~;-v C I T0: LJ Mayor 'and Members of Lhe Ctty Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Ne11, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa Jr., Associate Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation Lo Landscape Maintenance District u~ I ..A Nuw~~ I ~nldln.. Ma1M~n~e~a nltf,.l ~f N11C. 1 .~11d for CUP BB-28, located on the southwest corner of Footh111 Boulevard and Malachite Avenue, submlttad by Forrest Perry. IIECOMIENDATIOM It is recommended that the City Coundl adopt the attached resolutions accepting the subject agreement, security aM ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance D1strlct No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenanee District Nos. 1 and 2, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. MCIC6NOIMID/ANALYSIS CUP 88-28 located on the southwest corner of Faoth111 Boulevard and Malachite Avenue in the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Specific P1 an, was approved by the Planning Coe~lsslon on January 10, 1990, for the construction of a retafl building within an existing shopping center consisting of 0.52 acres. In addition, the developer has been conditioned to Drovide archlteetural upgrades to the exlsting buildings. The Developer, Forrest Perry, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the public Improvements to the following amounts: Faithful Perforwance Bond: 58,930.00 Landscape and Maintenance Bond 54,465.00 32- cln couNCU srAFF REPORT CUP 89-28 - FORRESr PERRY SEPTEMBER 4, 1991 PAGE 'e Copies of the agreement, security and Consent and Naiver to Annexation Form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, (~~ Wm. Joe O'Neil City Engineer NJO:JS:~h Attachments 33 RESOLUTION N0. /~ . ~ 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROYEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 68-26 NHEREAS, the Cfty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has far its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on August 14, 1991, by Forrest Perry as developer, for Lhe lmprovenent of public right-of-way adlacent to the real property speclflcaily described therein, and generaity located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Malachite Avenue; and wwtNlAS, the install anon of sucA inprovenents, described 1n said Improvement Agreenent and suDJect to the terns thereof, is to be done in eonJunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Coam15s1on, CUP 88-26; arM NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement 1s secured and accompanied by good and sufflclent Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOM, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same 15 approved and the Mayor fs authorized to execute sane on behalf of_ said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and ? That said Improvement Security 1s accepted as good arW sufflclent, subtect to approval as to forxi and content thereof by the City Attorney. ~~~~ ~~ RESOLUTION N0. 7 !'' d.`j ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CTTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE IMINTEtU1NCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING tMINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR CUP 88-28 NHE REAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaaronga, California, has previously fonaed a special ewtntenance district pursuant to the tertns of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Otvislon 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Gode of the State of California, said special ^aintenance district known and destgneted as Landscape Nalntenance nle~rirr wn. t. serest. liahtine Maintenance Dtstrtct No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance 0lstrtct No. 2 ~herelnafter referred to as the "Maintenance DisLrlct'1: and NHEREAS, Lhe provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping arM L1ghLing Att of 19)2' authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and NHEREAS, at this tttae the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on ExhlbiL 'A' attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and NHEREAS, all of the ownvs of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL aF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOMS: SECTIOH 1: that the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative baQy hereby orders the annexation of the proper as shown 1n Exhlblt 'A" and the work progrma areas as described in Exhlblt "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance Dtstrtct, lnclud/ng~F-Tevy of ail assessa>ents, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. 35 E%H181T 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANQSCAPE MAINTENANCE DI$TRIGT N4. 3 APN zca-zci-zo '6riginaf Poor Quality. I rov+xiu s. s,, ,, n . eou~[v~no ~~ _. ..__i_f. ___ .fc- ~ ~.. ~i .- i ~ i ` I a _ .I ~ ~ QUANTITIES ~I ~ ~ i TREES -- 3 . VI ~~__ ^~ so B u I ~I . , ___ °ii•einr anrn PRQIECT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~ ' cue ea-ze C~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA MALACHITE AVE. ~/ ~~~ . . EXN1@!T '@' PRQIECT NAME: CUP 88-28 N0. OF O,U, OR ACREAGE: 0.52 ac N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 1.04 units STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of lam s to be Annexed District No. I --- --- --- --- -° 2 1 --- --- --- -__ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Community Turf Ground Cover Trees D1strlct No. Street Name Equest.Tratl Sg. ft• Sg. ft. Ea. 1 Malachite --- --- --- 3 JS/9/4/91 37 -- C1'17 OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT tlATE: September 4, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the Ctty Cauncll ' Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa Jr., Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING lNINTENANCE DISTRICT nub. 1 nnu 4 rUN GMUNI:N JIIRtI, LUCA ICD tltIAEEN ELM AVENUE-NEST AND ELM AYEIRIE SUBMITTED BY LEWTS HOLES OF CALIFORNIA IECd1EIMTIp1 It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting the subject agreement, security and ordering the annexation to Street L1 hting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALTSIS The proposed Church Street between Elm Avenue-Nest and Elm Avenue wiil complete the circuiatlon systea along Church Street between Haven Avenue and Milliken Avenue. The Developer, Lewis Homes of California, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the improvements 1n the following amounts: Faithful Labor and Performance Bond Material Bond Store Drain Improvements Elm Avenue West to Spruce Avenue S 238,274.00 S 119,137.00 Church Street-Spruce Avenue Easterly to Elm Avenue East f 347,782.00 S 173,891.00 Church Street-Spruce Avenue Westerly to Elm Avenue Nest S 453,358.00 S 226,679.00 Elm Avenue West-RevlSed at Church Street f 21,859.00 S 10,929.00 ~~ STAFF REPORT SEPTEMBER 4, 1991 PAGE 2 Elm Avenue - Revi;~:~ ;* Church Street f 33,59S.W S 16,798,OU Total (1,094,868,00 S 547;434,00 It should be noted that there is no landscape at this time, thus it is not being added to the Landscape District. Rowever, there is undeveloped property ad,~acent to this street and upon any development, the landscape will be completed and added to the district. Copies of cia: Pyrzeixuii., secc~ ;:;; a^~ Co.^.C^.^.t ~M wa1VPY to gnnexation Fore signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully su Lted, Mm. Joe O'Netl~/ City Engineer MJO:JS:~k Attachments 39 RESOLUTION N0. ~/-a5~ A RESOLUTION OF THE LITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CHURCH STREET MHEREAS, the City Council of the L1ty of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on August 19, 1991 by Lewis Homes of California as developer, for the Improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally Located between Elm Avenue Nest and Elm Avenue; and WHEREAS, the Installation of such improvements, described to said Improvement Agreement and subject to the temps thereof, is to be done in conJunction with the development of said teat property; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufPlctent Improvement Security, which 1s identified in said Improvement Agreement. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONW, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor 1s authorized to execute same on behalf of said Ctty and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subJect to approval as to fore and content thereof by the City Attorney. ~~~ ~a RESOLUTION NO. l ~. a. JCJC A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNE%ATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR CHURCH STREET WHEREAS, the Ctty Council of the City of poncho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the Landscaping and Lighting Att of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, seid special maintenance district known and designated as Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Ltghting Maintenance District No. 4 /6orel w.s~.. ..._._..._.... :,, c;,~G ;,,; „ L;~ "iiainsenence uistrict'1; aM WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Ltghting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of addittonai territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council 15 desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A` attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and to be annexedRto thelMaintenancenDistrict have filedhwithhtheeCity Clerk their written consent to they proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineers Report . NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are alt true and correct. SECTION 2: That this 1eg151ative bogy hereby orders the annexation of the proper y as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described Tn Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. including SEC~O~ 3;ofTa11 alssesumientsroshallnbe applTcablertoathe territory annexed hereunder. ~/ Originai roor ~~a;ii`y. ® PRd ECT AREJ1 VICINITY MAP CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r V N Nf5 ~. VICINITY MAP ENGINEERING DM9ION EXHIBPf: EXNIOIT 't<' PROJECT NAME: Church Street N0. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: N/A N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: N/A STREET LIGNiING IMINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of Lam s to be Annexed Dtstrlct No. ~ ~_ 1 --- 2~ _~_ _-- "- 4 ___ __• ___ _-' --- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Coaewnity Turf Ground Cover Trees Oistrlct No. Street NaaM! EQUest.Tra11 Sp. ft• SQ. ft. Ea. N/A JS:9/4/91 ~~ -- ---- -- CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA STAFF REPORT '`M1~' ~ '^] (' ~ ` - ' !` - L Y DATE: September 4, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. G11111and, Public Norks Inspector SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS qN0 NOTICE OF C018LETION FOR D0. 97-34 LOCATED ON THE NEST SIDE OF sorgigaLD AYENUE SOUTH OF BASE LINE ROAD. RECOMNEND117Id1: the required street improvements for DR 87-34 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize tAe C1ty Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bono in the amount of f36,300.00 BACK6ROIIND/ANALYSIS DR 87-34 - located on the west side of Archibald Avenue south of 0ase line Road DEVELOPER: ARCN, Ltd 205 E. Garvey Avenue Monterey Park, CA 91754 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) (36,300.00 Respectfuliy~ submitted pn , Vhn. Joe O'NeiY City Engineer VIJO:SMG:Iy Attachment Y'~ RESOLUTION N0.9/'~ j~0 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 87-34 IIIID AUTHOR [ZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the construction of public improvenM•nts for DR 81-34 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and HHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be f11ed, certifying fl.n ww~ ~ w..1.. ~.. NON, THEREFORE, the C1ty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and Lhe City Engineer is authorized to sign and fife a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~~ ~~ ---- C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: September 4, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: lAa. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector f /J SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR PARCEL MAP 13125 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHNEST CORNER OF TRADEMARK STREET AND CENTER AYENUE RECOMMENDATION: The required street improvements for Parcel Mep 13125 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and tt is recomaended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Band in the amount of f4,400.00, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Compietlon and authorize the City Clerk to releax the Faithful Performance Bond 1n the amount of f44,000.00 8ACK6110UND/ANALYSIS Darcel Map 13125 - located on the southwest corner of Trademark Street and Center Avenue DEVELOPER: Burke Commercial Development 42 Corporate Park Suite 210 Irvine, CA 92714 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) f 4,400.00 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) f44,000.00 Respectfully bmitted, Ll~ [~~ Wm. Joe O'Nei City Engineer NJO:SMG:Iy Attachment 7b RESOLUTION NO• ~/j -a5~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL iMP 13125 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COI~LEtION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the construction of public laprovements for Parcel Map 13!25 have been caepleted to the satisfaction of the Ctty Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Coapietion is required to be filed, certifying unc „~,n bVw~,1C K• NON, THEREFORE, the C1>{y Council of the City of Rsncho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work 15 hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Coagletion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. T~ ---- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STtLFF REPORT DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: September 4, 1991 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Nm. Joe O'Neil, Clty Engineer Michael 0. Long, Supervising Public Works Inspector ACCEPT THE ROCHESTER AVENUE PARKNAY BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT, C.0. 90-050, AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A "NOTICE OF COMPLETION". RECONEIWTION It Ts recommended that City Council accept the Rochester Avenue Parkway Beautlftcatlon Protect, C.0. 40-050, as complete, authorize the City Lo file a "Notice of Completion', retain the Faithful Perforaance Bond 1n the amount of (315,346.50 to be used as the Melntenance Bond, and authorize the release of the retention 1n the amount of f11,525.53 and the Labor and Materials Bond 1n the amount of (15),573.25, 35 days after the recordation of said notice 1f no claims have been received. Also, approve the final contract amount of f350,532.57. BACK6ROUID/ANALYSIS The sub,{ect pro,Iect has been completed 1n accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on pro,Iect documentation, 1s (350,532.57 which Includes 5 contract change orders for masonry wall modifications and irrigation system modifications. Respectfully su~~~ Nm. Joe O'Neil UUU City Engineer NJO:POL:Iy Attachments ~~ RESOLUTION N0. 9j ' ~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCNMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS fOR ROCHESTER AVENUE PARKWAY BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT, C.O. 90-050 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE IIORK WHEREAS, the construction of public inproveaients for Rochester Avenue Darkriay Beautification Protect, C.O. 90-050, have been completed to the satisfaction of the Ctty Engineer; and WHEREAS: a 4orir•. n1 r.rn1.~1~. ~~ ::yII+„~,~, w ;~ i~ieJ, mar ii ly ing the vrork complete. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON6A, HEREBY RESOLVES that the wrk 1s hereby accepted and the Ctty Engineer 1s authorized to sign and file a "Notice of Completion" with the County Recorder of San Bernardino. --,,. ~/ V Cl'T Vl''t(ANVriV I:UGAMUNIiA ~Z`Ar`~ REls(71i,T .. k ., +,. DATE: September 4, 1991 T0: Mayor and Membere of the City Council ~~`~ Jack lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Barrye R. Hanson, Sr. Ctv11 Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO VACATE A SIOEHALK EASEMENT, LOCATED BETWEEN 9415 AND 9425 PALO ALTO STREET, AT THE TERMINUS OF LAYTON Siia:u iuiu ~niiirin iriE unit K rUOLW riEnniiin run ui,iwEn 2, 1991. IECOMMENOATIdI It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution setting the Dubl is hearing for October 2, 1991, for the vacation of a sidewalk easement located between 9415 and 9425 Paio Alto Street, at the ternitnus of Layton Street, approximately 8 feet wide and 114 feet long. In addition, said resolution authorizes the City Clerk to cause same resolution to be published 10 days prior to the public hearing. The easeaent was dedicated prior to the City's Incorporation in May 1964. The walkway 1s 8 feet wide, 114 feet long and 1s a pedestrian connection between Pato Alta Street (at the terminus of Layton Street) to the northeast corner of the Cucamonga Junior High Schocl property (refer to Exhibit "C°). the appl Tcants, Steven and Teri Sokol off 9415 Palo Alto Street (1 of 18 of Tract 6939 as shown on Exhibit Bi) have requested the sidewalk easement on the east of their property to be vacated. In recent years the neighbors have Incurred numerous problems with the use of the walkway. Occurrences of vandalism to their properties, loitering, littering, graffiti and a recent fire started by a student, has led to their request. Cucamonga Junior Htgh School prefers to close the access and does not feel it would be a maior inconvenience far the students to proceed to Hellman Avenue instead. ~7( J CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SEPTEa6ER 4, 1991 PAGE 2 The City has received complaints from residents about parking on Paip Alto Street by spectators attending events on the schools sports fields and using the walkway for access. The City maintenance crews have the continuing nuisanoe of litter and graffiti removal. Once vacated, Lhe walkway area will be added to the Sokoloff property. Normally, with a vacation of this type, half of the property would be given to each of the adjacent properties; however, in this case, the easterly property owner prefers that it ail go to the Spkoloffs. The P bseen decided aslyet{ butfw111ebecatsthen5okoloff~soexpenseidewalk has On August 28th, 1991, t.".: "'arming coemission detenlned that the alto„ conrarms to the General Pi an and recammeided that the vacation occur, subject to a timely closure and subsequent removal of the walkway. The recommendation Ts based an the unique circuastances of this pedestrian access which was approved prior to the City s incorporation, therefore does not refl act the design standards that are currently being implemented. Respectfully submitte/d(,~ ~/ ~`'' ~~l Nm. Joe O'Neil J City Engine NJO:BRN:jh Attachment ~f RESOLUTIDN N0. Gi - a5 I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A SIDEMALK EASEMENT LOCATED BETNEEN 9415 AND 9425 PALO ALTO STREET, AT THE 7ERMIUS OF LAYTON STREET. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Ctty Council hereby elects to proceed under Section uaw, et. seq., or Ln! Jtreers ono ntgmvays woe, aiso Known as the Street Yacatlon Act of 1941. SECTION 2: That the City Councti hereby declares its intention to vacate a s~f~al cTeasaeent 8 feet wide and 114 feet tang, as shown on Map No. Y-118 on file in the Office of the City Clerk, a legal description of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A" and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 3: That the City Council hereby fixes Nednesd4Y. the 2nd day of October ff99r at 7:00 D.~., to the City Council ChaMbers, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CaliforMa, as the time and place for hearingg all persons ob,Iecting to the proposed vacation for the purpose of Its deternlntng whether Bald City easement is necessary for present or prospective easement purposes. SECTION 4: That the City Street Superintendent shall cause notices to be pos conspicuously along the easement or part thereof proposed to 6e vacated at least 10 days before the hearing, not more than 300 feet apart and not less than three signs shall be posted, each of which shalt have n copy of this resolution on them and shall have the following title in lettering not less than one inch 1n height: "NOTICE OF HEARING TO YACATE EASEMENT". SECTION 5: The sub,Tect vacation shall be subfect to the reservations and excep o'f~s,'~il• aW, for ex15t1ng ut111ties on record. SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attes~fie same, and the City Clerk shall cause same to be published SO days before the date set for the hearing, at least ante in Inland Vnil Dail Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published n e o n ar o, a ornta, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, CailfornTa. ~h Legal Description Vacation of Pelo Alto Street/CUCnaonga Junior High School Sidewalk 8aseaent Being a portion of Tract 6919 per plat recorded in Book 91 of Maps, Pages 49 through 5p inclusive, records of the County Recorder of the County of Ben Bernardino, State of California, acre pertiaulsrly described se that certain strip of land a feet vide end 111 feet long lying easterly of Lot 18 snd westerly of L^t 19 aa::at~d ^a -' B :wC aa.e.enc co San earnardino county for sidewalk purposes on said asp, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA @tGII~fEEERIldG DIVISION ~~1 V° 118 xrc1.E: I.FJC~P-L LIESCRI PT I DN EX1~1T: A ~ ~ ~ ~ {~ Netl.man I Avenue V ~ ~ ~ ~ I u o~ '~ D ~ ~ 0 / ~, Li~ ~~m e d ~' ~% m a. e n ~ F 0 ^ I ~ ~g~ n ~~ ~ ~ ~N U 0 Ql v N to 6~ rl n Layton Sf~ceE - ~~ N D ~--_ v 11- ti ~~ ~:~ ~n v 0 Da n ~, o i rt~ 0 o ~ i~ n a Y z~ ~ ~ A O G1 s r i ~ Z~p C1TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~ GATE: September 4, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council ' Jack lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO VACATE A RECORDED OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR A PORTION OF MIGNONETTE STREET, SETTING THE DATE OF PUBLIC urenrun rnn nnrnnrn n ,nn. n,,. n. IMDROVEMENT CONTRIICT~AND LIEN~AGREEMENT~FOR 9260 MIGNONETTE STREET Yt 1s reco~naended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions setting the public hearing for October 2, 1991, for the vacation of a recorded offer of dedication for a portion of Mignonette Street from Hellman Avenue westerly including the partial cul-de-sac and Release of a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and authorizing the Mayor to sign said release and the City Clerk to record same. In addition, said public hearing resolution authorizes the City Clerk to cause same resolution to be published 10 dyys prior to the Pubi tc Hearing. the final map for Parcel Map 3189 was accepted by San Bernardino County on November 24, 1976, and as part of the conditions of approval for said map, a 30' half-street offer of dedication was made for Mignonette Street from Hellman Avenue westerly Including a partial cul-de-sac. On May 15, 1991, the homeowners of Parcels 1 and 2 of Parcel Map 3189 flied a request to vacate Bald offer of Dedication. A grant of easement for Ingress/egress from Hellman Avenue Lo Parcel 2 will De recorded concurrently with the vacation of the offer of dedication. The owners to the south of the subject dedication prefer to develop their property 1n a configuration not involving the development of Mignonette Street. Based on the above declarations, the proposed vacation is in confo~lty with the General P1 an. In addition, a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for 9260 Mignonette Street submitted by Mona F. and Stephen L. Butters and Ruth U. and Bernard C. Daugherty, was approved by the City Council on March 4, 1982, and recorded on May 25, 1982 as Document No. 82-102546 5~ CITT CWNCIL STAFF REPORT 9260 M[GNONETTE SEpTENBER Q, 1991 PAGE 2 1n the County of San Bernardino, CA. The lien Agreement pertained to the Developers' responsibility of fuWre construction of the off-site street Improvements upon and along Mignonette Street adJacent to Parcel 2 of P,M. 3189. The vacation of the sub,~ect recorded offer of dedication eliminates the need for the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement. On August 26, 1991, the Planning Canenisslon found that Bald vacation would confona to the General Plan and recomAended that the vacation n~nir. Respectfully submitted; ~.47Zec~. Nm. Joe 0' et City Engineer NJO:SM:3h Attachment 5~ RESOLUTION N0. ~` ~~ D follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A RECORDED OFFER OF DEDICATION FORA PORTION OF MIGNONETTE STREET FROM HELLMAN AYENUE NESTERLY INCLUDING THE PARTIAL CUL-DE-SAC - APN 202-041-57 AND 58 8E IT RESOLVED by the City Councll of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as ccrr+nu is T`1t • ' ~i `w v'Ju,w ii IIp1'Cpy ei ec ss co proceed under Section 9900; ef-seq., of~the Streets and Htghra~ys Code, also knoMn as the Street Vacation Act of 1941. SECTION 2: That the City Councll hereby declares Its intention to vacate a recor offer of dedication fora portion of Mignonette Street from Hellman Avenue westerly including tht partial cul-de-sac -APN 202-041-57 and 58, as shown on Map No. V-116 on file 1n the Office of the City Clerk, a iegal description of which 1s attached hereto marked Exhibit "A" and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 3: That the City Council hereby fixes Nednasday, the 2nd day of October, T49r-at 1:00 p.m., 1n Lhe City Councll Chambers, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time and place for hearing all persons ob3ecting to the proposed vacation for the purpose of Its determining whether said offer of dedication is necessary for present or prospective street Durposes. SECTION 4: That the City Street Superintendent shall cause notices to be post~icuousiy along the line of the street or part thereof proposed to be vacated at least IO days before the hearing, not more than 300 feet apart and not less than three Signs shall be posted, each of which shall have a copy of this resolution on them and shall have the following title 1n lettering not less than one loch in height: "NOTICE OF HEARING TO VACATE STREET". SECTION 5: The sub3ect vacation shall be sub3ect to the reservations and except ons, any, for existing utilities on record. SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to same, and the City Clerk shall cause same to be published 10 days before the date Set far the hearing, at least once in Inland Valle Dail~Bulle_ti~n, a newspaper of general circulation published n e o ntar0 fo, California, and circulated 1n the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. EXH Ie IT "A" LE^vAL DESCRIPTION OF VACATION THAT PORTION OF MIGNONETTE STREET OP PARCEL NOS. 1 AND 2 AS DELINEATED ON PARCEL MAP NO. 3189, RECORDED IN PARCEL MAP BOOK 30, PAGE 95, RECGRDE OF SAN BE.RNARDINO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA C1 ~~ A y Q I A n a Original Poor Quality 3 cn < - - -- .. z ~~~. ~~ r M i 0 R~ ' auu a I~ ~ ~ y o 3 O M '~1 m Z~ m /'O YYY ,~, U ~° d 2 n i a n °x ~ A x~ O 'O ~v u, n y ~ w ~. ~~ a 3 ~ ' z° ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ "`' ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~~~ rn ^~ r '~ ti ~ y C~ ., 1V 3 ,,, ~ ~ 30~~ ''' Q b ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~>> ~ ~ ~ o r1j ~ h r,`l ; rn ~ ~ << ~ .. y ~ ~ \ ~`, ~-` I~ p as y u~ ;. m `I ~, ~ o ~~ = NEL L N1.4N AIDE. o~ ~ ~ ~~j m -. ~(J a RESOLUTION N0. ~l' d¢j/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGII, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FOR 9260 MIGNONETTE STREET FROM MONA F. AND STEPHEN L. BUTTERS AND RUTH U. AND BERNARD C. DAUGHERTY WHEREAS, the City Council of Resolution No. 82-41 accepting a Real Agreement from Mona F. and Stephen L. Daugherty; and the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Property Improvement Contract and Lien Butters and Ruth U. and Bernard C. WHEREAS, said Real Properly Improvement Contract and L1en Agreement was recorded 1n Off1c1a1 Records of San Bernardino County, California, on May 25, 1982, as Document No. 82-102546; and WHEREAS, said Real Property Contract and L1en Agreement is no longer required. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the Lity of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby release said Reai Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement from 9260 Mignonette, Parcel 2 of PM 3189 (See attached Exhibit "A )and that the Ctty Clerk shall cause Release of Lien to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, Callfornta. .__,~ RECORDINS REQIIESTEO er: and MIEN IECOROED INIL T0: CITY CLERK ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P, 0. Boz 807 RANCHO WCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA 91729 NOTICE OF RELEASE OF LIEN Lah nnNro h+ ..~.... th:' :`. C. Wv` npmim Cucamonga bereey release its lien which it had caused to be recorded on the land hereinafter nrore fully described, said lien having been placed thereon by the recording of a contract between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Mona F. and Stephen L. Butters and Ruth U, and Bernard C. Daugherty, dated March 4, 1982, and recorded on May 25, 1982, as Document No. 82-102546 Recorded in Official Records, San Barnardlno County, State of California. The description of the land is as follows: Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 3189 as recorded 1n Book 30, page 95 of Parcel Maps official records of said county. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation By: enn s ou a e Mayor ATTEST: ADPROVEO AS TO FORM: e ra ams orney City Clerk Exhibit "A" 1 C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 4, 1991 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to We City Maqager SUBJECT: Continuance of Alley Vacation -Sierra Madre to Vinmaz Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council continue this item for 30 days. Background: To successfully resolve this item, staff is in the process of contacting all of the affected property owners. The ideal solution of this matter requires that the property owners along the north side of the alley give up the vehicular access they have been enjoying from the alley. As there aze some absentee owners involved, it is proving more difficult than originally anticipated to get the necessary agreements in place. For the above reasons, staff is asking fora 30 day continuance to this item. R ectfully Submitted, ~ ~~ September 4, 1991 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Jerry R. Grant, Building Official SUBJECT; ORDINANCE N0. 311 A ADOPTING THE 1990 NRTIONAL ELECTRICAL COOE ANO LOCAL MODi FICAT IONS THERETO RECONNENDATION It is recommended that the City Council conduct the public hearing advertised for this meeting, take testimony and hold first reading of the accompanying Ordinance No. 311 A. BACKGROUND On a triennial basis, the State adopts the latest editions of nationally recognized codes and mandates them for apylica Lion in local ,f urisdictions six months after the State adoption. The six month pert od for the 1990 National Electrical Code expired July 1, therefore, by state dictate, it is now in effect. The ordinance before you will coordinate our local modifications with the latest edition of the National Electrical Code and State electrical regulations, At the City Council Meeting of August 1, the Council authorized setting of the pu hlic hearing far this date. The previous staff report, attached, au tl fines the significant changes that have occurred in the new code edition. Our local inodifica Lions are unchanged from the current ordinance. Copies of the ordf nance and resolution have been provided to the Building Industry Association and the Chamber of Commerce. SUMMARY City Council approval of the accompanying ordinance will bring our electrical regulations into line with the latest state mandate. The accompanying resolution is for information only and will be brought before the City Council at the time of second reading. Respectf/u~l~l/~/yJ su6mi tted, Jerr Grant Building Official JRG:11 (O August 7, 1991 C[TY OF RANCHO CCCA~IOtiGA STAFF REP{3RT T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM• .la rrv r.~ant RuilM nn nffiN al SUBJECT: ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 1990 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE ANO LOCAL MOOIFICAT IONS THERETO RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council give preliminary first reading of the accompanying ordinance and set the date of September 4, 1991 for. public hearing precedent to ado ptton of the 1990 edition of the National Electrical Code with local modifications. BACKGROUND On November 16, 1990 the State Building Standards Commission approved State adoption of the 1990 Edition of the National Electrical Code and set an effective date of July 1, 1991 for its application on a local level. State Senate Bill 2871, Lha ptered in 1968, also altered the adoption processes for cities in that certain mandated model codes ;including the National Electrical Code) now are to be adopted for all occupancies throughout the state rather than certain limited applications previously included. ANALYSIS The action of the Ouilding Standards Commission adopting the 1990 Edition of the National Electrical code, and the enactment of Senate Bill 2871, now requires local jurisdictions to apply the regulations set forth therein as of July 1, 1991. In order for the local moth ff cati ons adopted by Rancho Cucamonga to be coordinated with the new edition, it is now necessary to adapt the proposed ordinance. There are aDDroxima tely 1000 changes in the new edition most of which are minor and technical in nature and have little effect on construction. There are several items that have some impact on construction; most notably, on residential work. They are; l~G STAFF REPORT ORDINANCE ADOPTING iNE L990 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE ANO !OCAL MODIFICATIONS THERETO August 7, 1991 Page 2 a. Receptacles (plugs) for kitchen counter areas are now required to be spaced no more than 4 feet apart. b. Hallways 10 feet long or longer now must be provided with a receptacle outlet, c. Single-family dwellings without direct exterior access to rear yard areas (townhouses) now require an outdoor receptacle in the rear yard area. d. Illuminated interior sta irwa vs of stv a+e~~ ~~ - -- reyuireo [o have light swftches at top and bottom levels. SiMURT Holding Drelimi na ry first reading and settf ng a hearing date for the accompanying ordinance will set the stage for coordination of Rancho Cucamonga local modifications with the latest edition of the National Electrical Code and bring the City Electrical Regulations into accord with State electrical regulations. Respectfully submitted, Jerry Gra~~/~ Building Dffi[ial JG:iI Y DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY RE50LLTION H0. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING EXPRESS FINDINGS OF NEED fOR LOCAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE STATE BUILDING STANDARDS CODE , WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Sections 17958.5 and 17958.7 allow a city to make such modifications to the requirements of the regulations adopted pursuant Lo Health and Safety Code Section 17922 as ft determines to be reasonably necessary because of local conditions; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is located in a piedmont area at the base of Lhe San Gabriel mountains, said location characterized by a warm and dry climate that contributes Lo a much more extensive and more prolonged outdoor lfving environment than is common to other Darts of the ct~tc; ..,~.. MHEREAS, the Nationai Electrical Code as adopted by the State Building Standards Commission has no requirements for expansion of electrical Wiring systems to serve outdoor living areas and accessory buildings; and MHEREAS, the National Electrical Gode as adopted by the State Building Standards Commission has no requirements for wiring of detached accessory buildings; and MHEREAS, significant climaLfc temperature differentials coupled with induced heat from load result in increased corrosion and resultant arcing of improper connections in aluminum wiring; and WHEREAS, the National Electrical Code makes no provision for the utilization and protection from damage of electrical wiring in accesory structures and areas that result from use of such areas because of the favorable climatic conditions; and NH EREAS, the Uniform Building Code as adopted by the State Department of Housing and Community Development is adopted on a statewide basis without specific consideration for the above stated and climatic conditions. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby determine and make the following express findings: 1. That modifications of Sections 210-52(g), 210-54, 210-70(a), 210-70(d), 210-70(e), 220-10(a), 230-212, 300-15 (d), 310-14, 336-3(b) and 336-4 of the National Electrical Code, 1990 Editf on are necessary due to local climatic conditions existent to the City of Rancho Cucamonga which provide an ideal environment for Lhe utilization of accesory areas and structures and outdoor areas for hobby and recreational purposes. ~~ Resolution No. Page 2 The City Clerk shall attest to the passage of this resolution and shall forward an executed copy of same and a copy of Ordinance adopted herewith Lo the Department of Housing and Community Development, State of California consistent with Section 11958.7 of the Health and Safety Code. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1991. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Oid)I1II~NCE lA. 313A AN OtAII~U+FiC.'E OF THE CIT1C OOCNCZL, OF THE CITY OF RANWO COCAMON(,q, CALIEDI3iIA, AMESIDING QIAPfFR 15.24 E[.ECIRICAL WDE, OF THE RANaD COCAlL1N(Wf N(MCIPAL NDE~ AND ADDPl'IIJG EY REFIItII1GR THE NATIQ~AL Rr.FriorCAL CODE, 1990 IDPPION~ WTIIi CEESAIH AME2l~715, AOD2T2CNS, DEI,IITCNS AND EXCEPFFIONS 70 SAID OODE A. Recitals. (i) Article 2 oP 1 of Part 1 of Division 1 of Title 5 of tale uu~itro up awyuuy Ly crieCaioe OI IIp Natimal Electrical •Nde, 199o Ptlitim ae publ.isUed by the National Fire Protectim Association. (ii) At least one Dopy of said Code certified as full, true aid correct orgy thereof by the City Clerk of the City of Rands Qraffirla has been filed in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rand~o Cursmc~a in acmxdatre with the provisions of GoVert~ent Code Section 50022.6. (iii) A duly noticed public heariig, as required by (~lifornia Coverim~ent CUde Section 50022.3, has bPPrl COIdUCted and ocigluded prior to the adOF)tiOtl of this OrHirwr,ra, (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this oxrlinarne have oocwred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the city Oo~uicil of the City of Rarrln Cucammga does hereby ford, detnr+n;ro and ordain as follows: Skxi70N 1: In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Orrltr]anCe. SFX.TION 2: (17apter 15.24 of Title 15 of the Rarrho Cu®raga Mmicipal Code, entitled "Electrical Oxle", of the City of Fandro C is hereby amerdeci, provided that said amerdowiit shall not apply to or e>oLVSe any violation thereof omnring prior to the effective date of this Ortiinarne std provide frm+r.cr that the National Electrical node, as adopted by refereme arcl amended by orrlinanoe No. 311 of this City shall oontirare to be applicable to oonstroction far whidi permits have been issued prior tc the effective date of this ordinarr_e.. Cha_mp+- r5.24 CODES ADDPPION Sections: SFX7`ION 3: Chapter 15.24 of the Farrho CuGamorga Municipal Code is amended hereby to raid, in words and figures as follows: 7d ~, 313A ~ 2~~ ~ ~~~ ~„t Yultseie • Oio oode.~zt91~_~~laiT"J-~•~1 p~cN'~ fp - 15 24,030 p~l~~ 0 al ~ Vie} PDT' - ~d ~'ox 040 ~~'cYt 210-70(~ Au4~.i~t.Y.,~7~a £at' 6~ Voles 15 24.050 ~1Vae1~1>~~10 (a _~„d-Wi1'~ ~Y_- ~,citY `~kiyl 230-43 Atg'"'"- ~ ~~ t5.y4.060 gg•,tl^ .,, nrkledr~_ l..o Ra~Y'..prs[ yy y4.u;~ ~tico ~o0 15141 M~Al~t-~~ le y4,080 lion 14 ~v_~+~~~~.~pe CtEd 15.24.0909iCCt1~ 336'3 (b1~,~1'- ~55~ ~ Y~1 15.24.100 Sept? 3'364 e3'g7' 15.24. ~0 ~1~ 33b. ~ 51 l~letF~' y5.y4. 130 ~cles 550 n~ 1990 15.24.140 Attl im• tj~al g1e~i~ fof ~ Cif Code ~~,,~~y~'`~°,~~~`~~,~ica~ ~letia[~ 1 •2 10 ~ ]ClA• , ~1 a a"` i5 t~~ fpgetl~Y 15.24 ~ _ a ~ i~ Yt]itlw ~ ~1 iTi ~~ 2 5 Cade ~ ~_~~t exceFtyoc~ 0 0 a>al ~~xcal at 1~'!"." Ck~ t4ati ~ellin9 ~~yOn 210-52191 of FoY a ~.f ~ f~ y11a~0II S(a)l4)' £ollo~: 21o-52191 ~ ~ iaa c" am s~ ~atl~ ' 1~ ~ycl ~ Pa ~~t. ~ ~y ydditicn of $ ue a X512 ~30~ ~yctri «; Code ~ ~ tie?~ ~~t ti gall ~'°„ zlp-54 ~ 2541x1 a".laoa~~t~l~ll ~ ~ ~ W£~'on ~~ W~ltll aca t 1~~, o[~ie dw~ ~) ~kir9 '~°es ~' ~ v3` i~ £~ tea' least ~epf ~~ 0~` No•~ 3 ~~~~;yyti~ ~~ p1C Y°~t8~ ~ ~ VII ~11SYA l amt vial 1 ~ eit~ ~_.,,,~ ~K,f.~re Va,~eas ~ fori6~l ~ ue~s° or caiy f fy~ID~ll ~ airy 1~ ~ ~ a t~ ~ ~gY~"'~ ~lY~ ~c~ of ~~1 ~ 1~ ~~~-g~~,e nom` t ~1 ~ l~~s ~i~~"',T~~.~Fle,o • ~ tc~"" ~p sold' °'~ ~ f~lY 11~v~_ p1C1 :'' 21°- aix ~ to l~ am,lY type a*.~pr~ ~ won bl~~yldis'As_,.~my tPO ast; ~'"_ s~~z'O~'t Y•t~ ~°,`rP~ vll~a_n~2° ~~ ~a ~ ~ ~ .. to ~}..,.~t~ ~Sti~ ~ ~~,~~~.q. 3 ~7 ~Wj~~vy ~ ~y~~~ tl~n _ 8ta~~ ~_.~d gam m~`~14r YY fl ~~1~Y~d~1~ ~~ 9~°~,_w•g ~,ad~C/,~x7,~~~~i~'' yet~il 11 ba ~=~ Wi tT~ ~~i~l ccdB ~~ st+a ~A"" .ti~'al ~sA l5~ of t}ie ~ ~~a~ (bl ~ ~ • ~o11eA l~l~ ~r ioT' 210' filet=~ ~ al ~ytd~ ~~iYO°i°at Wv'" ~la~ 210-x° ~ ~lf}~ least~a'e~1typ 1~Y°~tioc3o ~ it i75~11 lliT'H Vni~l~ in byy~"_ ~it~5. CA lal a~~ea~ (al 1~ Mall ~ , ,~~ ~'liYA llgl _,..ditch ~~d~fez~ Y. oc i~ a ~ vk~e ~,r~ 1 ~1jR'"•~~_,.,~q ~1 ~tXie 11~~ ~~~~ ~iP"_ tom. at an ~Yl~~ls~ 5th ~l~Ua ~y'YFb .~ of l°S~Y CP flo~o~rerS~ Qloot lave ~lo°[ ~~let sbal ,~ ~ Po>~ T~e~^- atria ~1{~~ li~~,q ~ l~d.,a~ at ~i ois9' oa stal ~ ~~,~t,~li~'t ;~,.f1oaY sP~. a~ytia ~ iII~`_ ~ ~' Ora]71af108 NO. 31]A Page 4 to read as follows: sectim 210-70(d) Buildirc3s Aooeeaory to lultiple Dwelling tlvts. Garages ar carports designed for use by mote than me dwe111rg unit swill have at least one light outlet far each foin- (4) parking spaces ar fractim thereof. F3lere garnges ar Carpo_'1'8 are eeperdted by Malls ar partitims so as to farm individual areas serving individual dwelling unite, at least ore switdned lighting cutlet shall ba provided in each individual area. Separated garage ar carport areas shall ba wired m individual CWHL13IiJ 1an1L merPSB ar m d noUSe IDecec CY ma~CrH. Lic~rting outlets provided in ec®otruse garage ar carport areas shall be energized fry a horse meter ar metrrs. (e) see Sectim 210-54 (c) fm na~dercp~aad wiring requirements to detadred garages ar carports. 15.24.060 - ~-m 220-10(a1 Amended A~ity~lld ~tltEd Icads. Sectim 220-10(a) of the National Electrical Nde is herel~ amended to read as follows: 220-10 (a) AuQacity and Commuted Dads. Feeder a~ctars shall have sufficient ampacity to aipply the load served. In m case shall the mRxrted load of a feeder he less than the sum of the loads m the brarrir cix+anits supplied as detErmintgi by Part A of this Article after arty applicable demand factors permitted b~ Parts B, C ar D have been applied nar less than 50 aapes+es a~acity, whidiever is greater. 15.24.070 - sectim 230-43 Amended-Wirim Metlnds fot 600 Volts Nominal ar ,.,...-. Sectim 230-43 of the Natimal Electrical Code is hereby aae*+~n to rrad as follws: Sectim 230-43. Wiring +~'*^~= far 600 volts i7~*w~ ar l~s. SeTV1Ce entrarne CQdnCtOr5 Shall be Snstalled 171 dOOOrdanlCe Wlth the applicable requirements of this code mvecing the type of wiring method used and limited to following metYnds for the omq~arnies as outlined in (a) ar (b) below: (a) Nmresidential Oaarlnancies. 1. Riqid Metal CmrLnit. E:~eption No. 1: Alumina conduit shall mt be used far overhead service entrance raceway. Exoeptim No. 2: Aluminm conduit shall mt be used far na~derc~nrml service raceway. 73 OYdi7lBifo9 No. 31]11 Page 5 2. Irate[mediate Metal Oaduit. 3. Electrical Metallic 711b1Ig. Excepkian Ho. 1: Electrical Metallic tubing shall rot he - uaed v(,ere cg or iritrr~ded to ~'t service amp att~~. Exoeptim No. 2: Electrical metallic tubing skull not be used as urd~aad servios entrance raceway. 4. Wixeways. ?. numwaYe. 6. Auxiliary Qrttcrs. 7. Rigid Man-Metallic Caduit. Exueptim: Rigid nonmetallic oorduit shall not be used for averkread service e~+trame raoe~ay. 8. Cabletus. 9. Matal~[:lad Cable. 10. Minerwr Insulated Metal-Stneathetl Cdb]R. 11. Flexible Metal Oorduit not over 6 feet (1.83m) lag between raceway, arc betwmn raoetray aryl service equipment, with equilmerct. bondicg jumper installed arena the flexible metal aer]uit aooording to provisias of Sectim 250-79 (a) , (c) , (d) and (f). Also, see Section 350-2. lz. Approved cable tray system shall be permitted to support cables approved f~ use as service entrarr_e mrxLretars. (b) Residential Odes. In additim to the mettncls outlined in subsecGim (a), buildlrgs regulated bi' Sectim 17921 of the California Health and Safety code may utilize the foll.owvg met}nds for sec.~ice entaanx oorductors rfien installed in aooordanoe with applicable rnf,i,wnonta of this coos: 1. Open Wiring m Insulatars. 2. Service Fhtranoe Cable. 3. Liquidtic)fit flexible rgrmatallic mYLlit. 7`~ Oudilfatoe No. 317A page F 15.24. ae0 - ion z36-?12 Y~,•.•;=•.~, -iae fl]uiaOmlt 4SSe National Electrical Cade is hat~eby ameMed lit' adding section 230-212 to read as follows: Section 236-212 secures equipment a~city. Sazvioe equipment capacity shall he as follows: i. SetviCe equipment installed to serve side family dwellings shall have a capacity of rrt less than 20 eityle pole ot~eztxtrrent protective devices in additim to a main switch or circuit Ymeaker. Service corrluit setvirg single family c9etac3nd dwallity units shall be rot rase than Crra arrl ene- quarter itr.^ltes {3-1/4"j trade size arduit. 2. ..^'ervice equipment installed to setts oa~mtetcial or ittd<tstrial ti.; tdings shall have an atgt~ity ratLtg to serve YZye intended load bur ; t ass than 60 amperes. Sex+rioe concktit or feeder raicevays shall rni..`.; t,~s than 1" size except that where secures cro~ait or feeder raut:.~,• is cntpsaled, flea mattimmi size raceway shall be are atd me~- half indtes {1-i/2") trade size. 3. Eeedexa serving individual routs of multi-fami.Iy dwellings shall be installed ixi mt less titan me-inch trade {i") size cerrktit and xtm fry the meter lacatim to a distributim panel within eadt unit. 15.24:.42 - Section 306-15 (dj Adda~l-~spsre Racasevs, 7}te Natfatal Electrical tlx~ is herel»j ametrled cry adding Sectfm 300-15(dj to read as follows: Section 300-15 (dj S~r~are racesys. Ybr attached or detar~ single family dwellings, two (2) three-quarter inch (3/4") spare racesmys for future use shall be provided for each dwelling unit, one running fron ChC pettetboaitl t0 a21 aGOBS..ib3.e laation 711 the dtt7.G and OM to an aczw=sible locati~ order the flea. 10tere either spate is not available because of method of c~strtxtion, each terminatim of spare aat:rry~ chair be as approved by the Huilaing official. 15.24.100 - 5~~10-14 Wnetded-A]~.. i ,_,_,-s. ~ Natimal Electrical 0.ide is hereba+ amenied to read as follows: Section 310-14 iilvmirnaa Catxhx.'tors. (aj Material. Solid alvmiram conductotis, No. 8, 10 atd 12 AwG, shall be mule of an AA-8000 sexier electrical grade aU>m.itvam allay ounchactar material. Stratrled alumirzzn mss, No. 3 AWG thrdrlle 1000 M34, marked as type XFllDi, 7)SV, 'h>`~lir ~, service PlttrartPB type SE, Style U and SEr Style R, shall he made of an AA-3000 series electrical grade aluminum alloy cnrdu~.^tirg material. 7J ordiraine No. 311A Page ? Elaxption: Alumirm, smaller than No. 6 shall rot be used far cimrit Mors, Peedsrs cs subfeeders, unless installed under full-tine i~tim by a spacial It~spectar as a «spacial case« outlined in Section 306 (a)14 of the rmifarm Administratim (bde~as adopted tir Chapter 15.08 of this Title. 15.2d.1j0 - Sectim 336-31b) Ameided-Tune NdC Cable. Section 336- 3 (6) is hereby aloetNed to read as follows: section 336-3 (b) Type N4C. Type N7C cable shall be permitted: (i) for mroailed work in dry, moist, danp ar omrosive locations; (2) in outside aiti inside walls of masmry blade ar tile; (3) in a shallow chase in masonry, cvre~ete ar adobe and ~nered with plaster, adobe ar similar finish. Ydiere embedded in plaster nr ^~ :., a enallw diase in masn¢y wells arrr e^:~:..:, NMC cable shall be protected auai+~st ~:~ ir~m nails bi' a cover of wosceion resistant steel at least 1/16" in thidaiess. }5.24.120 - section 336-4 Amendediises Not Permitted. Section 336-4 of the Nati.or~al Electrical Oode is hemby amended to xeazi as follows: Section 336-4 tlses not permitted. (a) Type DFI ar tt~. Types HI4 and Id4C cables shall not bs used: (1) in any dwelling stxuct~me exoaedirg three etari.es above gxsde; (2) as serviaa-entrarre cablep (3) in any manexcial ar iir3ustrial luildinq; (4) in any hazardous location; (5) in hoistways; (6) in unenclosed locations of private garages ar carports; (7) embedded in poured Dement, o~crete or ag~¢egate; (8) in unenclose3 utderfloor areas. (b) Type M4. Type tSI cable shall mt be i.nskalled: (1) where exposed to cnsxnsive fumes ar vapors; (2) where embedded in maamry, carcaete adobe, fill, or plaster; (3) in d shallow d~ase in masonry, orrxxete, or adobe and covered in plaster. adobe, or similar finish. 15.24.130 - Seeticn 336-12 Delebad. Sactien 336-12 of said Natimal Electrical. fbde is hezrly deleted. 15.24.140 - articles 550 aid 551 Deleted. Articles 550 airl 551 of the National Electrical Code are harety deleted. SFX,TLCFI 4: Qiaptr_r 15.44 0£ the irdmn aicamorrga Mmicipol code is hereby readopted to read, in won'is atrl figures, as follods: [fAPfkR 15.44 srxtions: 15.44.010 Tdded-Penalty far Violations / ~O O[ditlanUe No. 31]A Page 8 15.44.020 Mkled-Civil Remedies Availablz 15.44.030 Ati96d 9erwrability 15.44.030 - Amended Penalty for Violatiore of Title. Section 15.44.010 of the Rarriw Qramd'ga Mtmicipal Code is hereof readopted to r:+ead as follows: Section 15.44.010 Penalty for Violation of Title. it shall he unlawful. far airy person, firm, partrtersknip, ar aoiporaiim to violate arty provisim or to fail to ocaply with arty of the requix~ents of this Title or the Oodes adopted hereby. Any pelsm, firm, partner- ship, or corporatiai violatitg arty provision of this Title oz the Codes adopted hereby or failing to comply with arty of its x+aquire- ^^~~ shall be deemed guilty of a misd®oearror and Opon mcnviction thereof shall be Aa'~~ ~; f{re rot exoaedug Orre thousand Dollars (51,000.00) or b~y >nprisorn~ent not erroaeSVg y;u: (~: ~~; or by both sudl fine and imprisonmeirt. Eadt each person, firm, partrwsship, ar corporation shall be deemed guilty of separate offense for eadt std every day ar any portion thereof &sirg whidr any violation of arty of the pravisiorm of this Title or the Codes adopted hereby is oanmitted, ootrtirtuetl ar permitted bi' such person, firm, parbsPSShip ar oorparation, and shall be deemed punishable therefar as provided in this Title. } .45 4.020 - Pay' ~'.~-civil Remedies Availn_t~le. 3eckim 15.44.020 of the Rarrlto Cucmnxga Y4micipal Code is hsebi( readopted to Head as follows: Section 15.44.020 Civil Raoeriies Available. The violation of any of the pmvisioas of this Title ar the Codes adopted hereby shall oomtitute a ruisame and may be abated bi' the City tluagh civil process IN means of restr-aittirg order, preliminary ar m~.Y,..t injunction ar in airy other rmrvwx provided by law for the abatement of suds rnrisatrces. 15.44.030 - Readooked-Severability. section 15.44.030 ofthe Parrctq Cum Mmicipal Code is heeby readopted to read as follows: Section 15.44.03 Severability. 'Ate City Cannil hereby declares that should sty provision, section, patagr+ph, sentence or wvtd of this Title or the Oxles hereby adopted be r,e,Ne,~w or declared i,~valid bf wry final mint action in a cant of rn jurisdiction, or by mason of wry preemptive legislatim, the ra~vu;*.irq provisi~s, sections, palacp^aphs, sentences std words of this Title and the Codes herelry adopted stall main in full force SFX'TIW 5: 'fie Mayor shall sign this Ordvrarce arcl the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15} days after its passage at least a>ce in the Tnlarcl Va~ye Daily &illetin, a newspaper of general cirtvlation published in the City of Ontario, California, and cinvlated in the City of Randlo Ctcamaga, California. 7~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT HATE: September 4, 1991 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council lack Lam, AIC P, City Manager FROM: Brad Huller, City Planner ai: uan UDleman, YrlnClpol Plannel SUBJECT: '1'AAII,$ II@LB~'1'ATI011 PLM - A mmpiehenaive implementation strategy for hiking, riding, and biking trai la within the community. RECOM~IOATIG~: Staff recommends that the City Council open for discussion, receive any testimony, end approve the Tralla Implementation Plan. BaCEGAG09H: The purpose of the Plan is to implement the comprehenai ve trails system set forth by the City's General Plan for regional, community, and local feeder Grails. The intent is to set Forth a long- term program to tranalat¢ the trail system envisioned by the General Plan into reality by identifying precise trail ali q:wenta, setting desi qn standards, determining costa, and defining long-term financing to fund trail development. The City Council directed staff to prepare a report with two key components: Plan Implementation and Pre iiminary Coet Estimates. In March 1990, the City Council approved the selection of Agajanian and Associates and J. F. Davidson Associates to prepare these components of the Trails Implementation Plan in order to set priorities for plan implementation and identify funding sources. ®CIIIG A9D RIDISG TIGIIS CWC6PT: The existing General Plan Master Plan of Trails established a regional trail eyatem utilizing the many flood control channels and utility corridors, a community trail system which connects the trail user with the regional trail system, and a local Feeder trail eyatem which enables the user access from their lot to the eon®unity and regional trail eyatem. Th¢ proposed Hiking and Aiding Trails Master Plan (Figure 2) indicate3 trail routes which were selected ae the most advantageous for hikers and equestrians Sn satisfying the General Plan objectives of safety, function, aesthetics, economics, and feasibility of acquisition. Trail routes are more precisely def load as to which side of a flood channel or street they follow. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TRAILS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Seutem6er d, lvvt Pa qe 2 The Trails Implementation Plan introduces the concept of a Primaty Loop Trail system (Figure 3). The Primary Loop trni is form a figure "e" consisting of a combination of Regional and Community Trai le, with Heritage Park located at its midsection. In this way, Heritage Park can be used as both a destination and a trail head. The Primary Loop, with a total length of about 14 miles, is crossed at regular intervals by Community Trails and affords a limit le as variety of trail experiences for both the hiker and the equestrian. The Plan includes a discussion of the need for trail head facilities at _~_• -~•~- ~ .. aii ncegang pomta Lor nakera, horse riders, and bicyclieta~. ~~Trail"heads would ideally be equipped with facilities each ae reetrooms, drinking fountains, parking for cars and horse trailers, bike racks, and watering troughs. In addition, the Plan discusses the need for an additional equestrian facility, like Xeritage Pnrk, somewhere near the Eliwanda rn®unity. BICiL7d TRAILS OD•L'~T: The proposed General Bikeways Plan (See Figure 7) focuses upon adapting the existing and proposed street system and flood controijuti lity corridor system to bicycle travel. Bqual emphasis ie placed upon destination (purpose) and non-destination (far-the-fun- of-it) oriented trips. Adopting the General Bikeways Plan is a requirement to be eligible to apply for bike trail grant funds. Although the proposed trail alignments build upon the City's General Plan and many specific and cov®unity plans, there are some changes that will necessitate future amendments for conaiatency. There are three types eE bike trails commonly defined in California. A Class I Hike Path is an off-street trail, Fully separated from automobile traffic, which allows for two-way bicycle travel. Class II Bike Lanes are striped lanes for exclusive use by bicyclists. A Claas III Bike Route is a bike trail simply identified with signs - the eycl ist shares the road with care. Class II and Class III bike trails are proposed for one-way bicycle travail hence, the trail would exist on both shoulders of the road. Generally, Bike Paths are proposed along flood channels to utilize the existing paved service road. Hike Lanes ate proposed mainly along major thoroughfares. Bike Routes are used along lessor streets with lower traffic volumes. However, in some case9, the determination as to which type of bike trail is proposed is based upon the available street section width. For example, Milliken Avenue is proposed as a Bike Route, De cause of insufficient width to accommodate a striped lane, even though it meets all other criteria for a Bike Lane. The Plan addresses the constraints which impede bicyclists or discourage bicycle co®uting. Figure 6 identif Les recommended underpass locations where flood channels cross major st rests. These underpasses are critical to the success of the Regional Tra11 system and would aervi ce the hiker, equestrian, and bicyclist. ~/ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TRAILS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN September d, 1991 Page s The City's General plan emphasized development of bicycle trails as an alternative transportation mode (e.q. bicycle commuting). A successful bike trail system for commuters moat address their unique needs For not only sake and convenient routes but adequate storage and showering/changing facilities. The Appendix contains proposed ordinances which would establl sh bicycle storage requirements for new development, as we 11 as incentives for employers to encourage bicycle commuting by providing showering and changing facilities for their employees. D6SIGI7 STAMDARDB: This chapter includes detailed standards for hiking, ____-- cc.. ...y ..aria. 'ens nixrng and riding trail standards reflect the City's current standards. The bicycle trail standards are based upon the Caltrans Niqhway Deai gn Manual, which is the recognized standard in the State of Ca llfarnia and a regal rement Eor grant funding. ADMINIS[RATION: This chapter def loss the responsibility of each City department as it pertains to the trail issues of 3etermining alignment, acquisition, cone traction design and plan check, construction and inspection, maintenance, enforcement, and abandonment. These responsibilities and staffing are aumiaxized in a matrix presented in Figure 15. IMPI.BatRi'fATION: The Implementation chapter is a listing of the regulatory tools available to implement the trail system. The chapter includes a brief discussion of the various funding sources and methods of acquiring trail rights-of-Way. The chapter includes a priority listing of hiking and riding trail improvement projects and bicycle trail improvement projects. implementation of the trail system will be accomplished in Eour phases as des criced below. Individual trail improvement projects may proceed through the various phases separate ly. Phase I Planmlog - The first phase would establish a long- term comprehensive implementation plan and detailed standards for trail development and would provide the coat factors and funding sources. PMae II Acquisition - The second phase of the program is to acquire the rights-of-way necessary For trail improvement, In undeveloped areas, the [rail system ie primarily installed by developers ae development occurs. The main concern here is to acquire the needed rights-of-way in areas of the community that are already developed, such as Alta Loma, to fill in the "mi eaing links." Pbaee III ueaigo and Constructlo0 - The th Srd phase is preparation of design plena for construction and the actual capital improvements. Txa it projects would be budgeted as capital improvement projects. V PI,ANNLNG CONMISSLON STAFF REPORT TRA IIS INPLENENTATION PLAN cepteeRer d, 1491 Page 4 Phase IV Neintemance - The fourth and final phase 1s maintaining the trail system once St ie in place. This includes routine maintenance (e.g., tree trimiinq, lane reatriping, sweeping, etc.), as well ae repair work. PRR.IMINAR! CONBlWIClION NNlL0SN8: The coat estimates to construct the trail system envisioned by the City's General Plan, as expanded upon in the Draft Trails Imp lementatlon plan, were prepared by J. P. Davidson Associates, Inc. The report gives a trail-by-trail breakdown of land arquiaitlon, construction ("hard costs"), and related management service ("sofa costs"). Separate tables are provided for Class I, Class II, and Class III bicycle trails, as well as tables for Regional and Coma'unity nixing and rl deng trails. No analyses was prepaxeA rox local feeder trails because they are constructed by private developers ae a condition of development and maintained by property owners. A summary of these coats is provided in Bxhibit "A". The summary indicates that the bikeway system will coat 537,957,903 to construct and the hiking and riding trail system will coat $37,218,456 to build. The total coat of building the entire 197 mile trail system, over the course of build-out of the community, would be $75,176,359 (in 1991 dollars). Construction of undercroaeinge where flood channels cross major streets accounts far $30,000,000 of the total development coats. FINANCIAL I!@LAlOQ7LATION: This report reviews the various financial resources to address implementation of the Grails system within the City. With only the regulatory exactions to implement the trails system and no long term funding sources available, the only real meaningful source for full implementation at this time to fill these implementation gaps is aeaesament district financing. All other funding sources are limited and uncertain. In an effort to respond to the funding limitations described above, staff has identified three options regarding the level of implementation ae shown on Exhibit A. ACTIONS: Based upon the information generated in this study, and the goals and policies of the City's General Plan as they relate to City-wide Trails Plan, the City Council's actions are: 1) Reaffirm support of the City's General Plan Trails Element. 2) Select one of the following levels of implementation: Option A (full system) Option s (no undercroesings) Option C (no undercroseinga/no PVC fencing). ~I PI,ANN ING COMMISSION STAPF REPORT TMILS ZMPLEMENTATION PLAN September S, 1331 Page 5 3) Adopt the Trails Implementation plan with one or all of the ~ following directions: a) Prepare applications for Article 3 funds and other grants. D) Ann lyre the feasibility of passage of a City-wide trail assessment district or Park and Open Space district. ,.i e... i.,..w thn wwtwbliahment o£ a nexus relationship Eor the CSty-wide Bikeway and and Regional Niking and Riding Trails Sn order Lo qualify, adopt, and apply a trail development impact fee. d) Analyze the consolidation of the existing landeceping and lighting districts ae n means to include bikeway maintenance reaponaibilitiea ae pert of the consolidated district. e) Consider in future budget years a trails coordinator position for the purpose of: t) Coordinating all trail planning and implementation activities. 2) Preparing grant applications Pot trail funding. 3) Undertaking the eatabli ahment of a trail flevelopment impact fee. 4) Promoting community support for special trail aeseeament diatri ct (a I. Resp lly tt zl.~` er u r Cit )sons[ Attachments: Draft Trails Implementation Plan (distributed under separate cover) Exhibit "A" - Summary of Trail Construction Costs Minutes of July 18, 1991 Planning Co®iasion Meeting Planning Commission Resolution No. 97-110 Resolution of Approval U N n S x n Q U Oa ~~ tai 2 V c ~~ V ~ a ~ w ~ ~ O ~. W F U a y U ~ N~ ~ ~ O M ~O Op N .~+ to G V n a g ~ h. a v; N ~ u N . N N w ~ ~ o y z M ~ v b N T ti t +1 4 V N M ~O (f O N H N W W Q h N M M ~O O~ °, ~ ~ a a ern , O N a v~"i m a0 ~ ~ '. rn r M ~ h r . n vi O fM9 w y H H w ~~ ~~ ~~ a H F a z ~ ' ~ 6 ° a ~ D ~ C7 r ~ ~ ..ap c 3 ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~UU ~ P4 W GtC Ci ~ OffJ 83 ~cNl~lt 4f~n TMILS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Dan Coleman, Prinelpel Planner, presented the stsff report. N• indicated that the purpou of tM workshop wu to review tN Preliminary Coat LstimaUe and FLnancinq Plan prepared by the City's eonsultanG. He reported that the total coat of the full Lrail lystem Le spproximately 575 mill LOn. Ne aLO lndlcat-d that staff would be pzeeantinq two other options to tM CLly council, including tM elimination of underpasses, which could lower the total east Co approximately 517 million. Statf recommended that the Commission adopt a resolution recommending approval to the City Council. Commissioner ToLtoy stthed that since lneorporatlon the City had emphssizsd development o[ the equestrian/hiklnq trail system. He felt that he wu not unsympathetic to the horp community, but Chought that it wu now LLae to emphuize bicycle tra1L. Me Lnd lcetM «t.r .w-._ _ o _az ~ - ~eee in cne City compared to thouunds of blcyeUe. Ne concluded that- bicycle ereil.e should receive tep priority, Dut not Lo the exclusion c! equutxian/hiklnq trail.. Brad Buller, City Planner, .rated that until now the Clty did not have tM strut Lnfraetructure in place to make SneGllation o! the bicycle trail syKem feaelbU. Ne augqubd that the Commiulon adopt • resolution stetinq their concern to the Cliy Council. Commiuioner Vallatte inquired whether the tlwelopment impact fn funds ducribsd in tM Financing Plan would G spent within the Cract thac generated the fee or uwd eLwNre. Betty MLl Ur, Associate Engineer, stated that the fNS could be citywide oz "sonad^ depending on how tM nexus study ie prepazW. Mr. Buller stabtl that the Financing Plan paint. tM picture for the city council to enable them to decide how much they cant to invest in the trails system. Motion: Hovel by Msleher, seconded by Toletoy, carried 4-0-1 (Chitiea abunt~, to adopt the zuolution recosimsndlnq approval to the City Council end direct Lnq staff to prepare a separate resolution stating that any addltlonnl capital funds should be made available for bicycle trail Lmpravsmente. . . . . 8:00 - 8:15 p.m. - Planning Commission redued. Chairman NeNlel lett tM niseting et 8:15 p, m. e . . • . Motions Novel by Melchor, seconded by Val lefts, carried 3-0-2 (Chitiea, NcNlel absent( to appoint Toletoy as Temporary Chairman. Planning Commission Minutes -d- July 18, 1991 B~ ro~4a.SillliN d0. 91-130 A RESOLUTION OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIPORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OP THE TMILS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN, AND ~ MAKING PINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEAEOF. WHEREAS, the City's Cenaral Plan carob liahed a Master Plen of Tra il• for a network of hiking, biking, and hotas ridLng trails ae a recreational element; and WHEREAS, the City'• General Plan policies call for programs to improve existing trail• to make the trail• afar, more functional, and accuaible and to faell StaG development of Remion+i u..: ~,-o.•._-^^^__ T._-- ,,.,,, uoNnunlty Trails ayatamaJ and wHSREA6, the Trail Implementation elan la consiatsnt with the goal and polieiea of the City'^ General Plan regarding trail a; and NNEREAS, the Trail Advisory Com:nitiu has rwiewd and recommended approval of tea Trolls ImplsmsntaLion Plan; and WHEREAS, duly advertleed public hearinga ware hold relative to the Planning Commission review of the Trails Implementation Plan. NOW, THEAEPOAS, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning CommLeion does hereby rscoamsnd to the City Council approval of the Trail• Implementation Plan. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 18TH DAY OP JDLY 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION O! TH8 CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTEST: I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning commies ion of the city of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cett ify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, pauad, and adopud by the Planning Caamiulon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of tM Plannlnq Cpmpiaeion held on the 18eh day of July 1991, 6y the [olloving vo[e-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MELCHER, HCNIEL, TOLBTOY, VALLETTB NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA g~~ AEEOLUTION NO. ~' i 1 /n A RESOLUTION OF TlQ: CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, GLIFORN IA. APPROVING TH6 TRAILS ~ IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. WNE PEAS, the City's General Plan established d Mastar Plan of TSa11s for a network of hiking, biking, and horse riding trails as a zecreetional element; and WHEREAS, the City's General Plan policies call for programs to improve existing trails to make the trai le safer, mare functional, and accessible and to facilitate deont...w~• -_ .-q--:.~. ,,,,/~i-rurpoae 'Frail and Community Trails systems; and WHEFEA3, the Trails Implementation Plan 18 consistent with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan regarding trails; and WHERBAS, tha Trai le Advisory Committee has reviewed and reco®ended approval of the Trails Implementation Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Conmiseion has recommended to the City Council approval of the Trails Implementation Plan. SECTION 1; It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City e£ Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest requires the implementation of a trail system; and SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the Trai le implementation Plan is hereby approved. ~~ D~j l,Ii I yr rcnivt,nv t;v i.nivlvtvtrn STAFF RESORT DATE: September 4, 1991 ~ To: Mayor and Nembare of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager ~ FROM: Brad Ruller, City Planner BY: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner SUBJECT: CoNSIDHRATION O ENVSR0NMRNTa1. twoarw semnm /eu...onwe..m.. RBCOMIDQIDATION: Consider comments 6y staff, the Historic Pruervation, Planning, and Pob11c safety's eommieslone ccncerninq the dtatt BIR/BIS for the Route 30 freeway extension and authorise the Mayor to forward same to the California Departauent of Transportation. ABSTRACT: The purpose of thin report i• to consider a formal city response to the draft Route 30 extension BIR/HIB. It should be noted that ehres City conmieelon• will have reviewed and commented on the draft BIR/BIS prior to City Council taking action on thin lism. Those commission's are Historic Preaetvet ion, Planning, and Public Safety commiaeione. The Public Safety Commission was given the 6IA/HIS nt ire August 6 meeting with requests that comments be sent to the Engineering Department. The Public Safety Commission generally supports the Fu l1 Freeway Alternative with the mitigation measures as the beet alternat Lve For our City. Tha Historic Preservation Commission reviewed this subject on August 2l, 1991, and the Planning Commission on August 28, 1991. Because of the timing for the staff report for the City Council meeting on Septeni6er 4, 1991 (in order io meet the deadline for comment of Septemb¢r 15, 1991) it will be neeeeeary to provide the changes to the "Detailed Liet of Comments and Concerns" iequseted by both the Historic Preservation and Planning commissions at the CLty Council meet inq. However, drafts of the HLOtoric Preservation Commission and Planning commission motions are attached. BACROROUND• Purooee: Aa stated In the draft BIR/BIS the purpose of the proposed Route 30 freeway extension is throe fold: 1. Eeta6lieh and enhance n major east/west travel corridor to allevinte projected traffic congestion on parallel routes such es Aoute 66 and the I-30 freeway. 2. Reduce travel time on the corridor. O~ CITY COVNCIL STAPP AEPORT ROVTB 30 PREEHAY Sapiaalbar q, 1991 Page 2 3. Provide an important link in the regional highway ayttem by connecting the ex taring I-215 and I-30 freeways, thereby providing more direct accee• between San Bernardino and Loa Angeles metropolitan areas. General plan Coneletenev: The proposed Route 30 freeway extension hoe bean planned Cor within the City's General Plan since the first formal plan adoption in 198q. Ae stated in the circulation implementation section page III-32 of the Genasal Plan, "Fcothill Freawav CorridoY. The development of a high speed limited access route along the Poothlll Freeway corridor Se an important component to the circulation system of the City. City policy straeess the nand for the develnrm~~« ~• _.. a~_c- wiira mqn epeaM Eac111ty along this corridor. Should CAI. TRANS,withdtaw from the development Of a Foothill Freeway, the City will evaluate other awthoda for development of the high speed corridor. Any changaa in the City's policy should be reflected in revisions to the General Plan." Nlth thin foundation firmly satebllahed, it should ba noted the City's rceponw t0 the draft 8IR/BIS L Lntended LO M aupportlve of the overall project. Tha comments generated from the city, thereEoza, are intended to be presented in an atmosphere of constructive coopetaticn when Clarifying itauee end concerns of particular relevance to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. EIR /E IS Proiact Summary: Tha subject EDVirmnmentil Document contains throe primary alEarnat Ives. These elternet ivee nre: No Proj eat Alternative, Full Freeway Development, and Praeway/Expree6way. The City's preterred alternative of a Full Freeway would provide three general purpose lanes plus one high occupancy (HOV) lane in each direction. The freeway would connect the existing Route 3D freeway from its existing terminus at Poothlll Boulevard (Route 66) in La Veins, t0 the I-215 Freeway in San Bernardino. It should aieo be noted Chat several sub-nlternat ivea have been and are still being studied for the e'uli rr^reeway and Preeway/Expressway alternatives. Vnreeolved ieeuee: According to the Environmental Document, several ieeuee remain unresolvedl these ieeuee are of a design nature according to the eIR/EIS. Two maj of ieeuee affecting the City of Rancho Cucamonga are: 1. Inter-change spacing, (L.e., the provision of one mile spaces for Lnterchangee ae pravioua planned for in the City of Rancho Cucamonga versus the Federal Highway Adminietration'a Standard of requiring a minimum two mile separation between interchanges and row areas). A request by the City of Fontana to provide direct access to cherry Avenue from Route 30. Both CALTRANS and the Federal Highway Adminletrat ion believe an interchange at Cherry Avenue could pose opezat tonal problaoe for the Aoute 30/1-15 interchange by providing an arterial interchange within a freeway to freeway Lntexehange. ~~ CITY COUNCIL STAPP REPORT ROUTC 30 PAEEWAY September 4, 1991 o.qe 3 As indicated on page 5-34 of the subject document, "further analysis of the above noted design leewa remain underway. These issues will bs fully eddrecsed and resolved prior to completion of the final environmental documentat ian. Other unresolved daeign ieauea, such se the location of frontage roads, park end ride lot a, and the identification of borrow sites for filled matsria 1, ate., are being addressed in cooperation with corridor clt iee. Thaeo ieauea will be reeolvsd in conjunction with the final project daeign and would 6e subject to separate envLronmental documentation.' AlIALYSIB: A. y,~l Preewav Alternative: A detailed diwueeion of the Full Prseway alternative can be found on paga 3 of the Planning Corooiseion'• staff report dated August Ze, 1991, and attached hereto for reference. In suamary, in should ba noted that a sub-alternative eoneidezed with the environmental document i• a Full-Freeway with a mad if lad two-mile interchange spacing. This alternative would remove interchanges proposed at Carnelian and Eaet Avenues. It should be noted that, according to the 6IRJEIS, with a modified two-mile interchange alternative, Lncreaeed congestion will likely be experienced on the atterLal• accommodating the diverted tra£f lc volumes requiring the affected cit iee i'o provide additional arterial enpacity. The arterial lane eonfiquratlone required to revive this needed capacity may 6e in erases of Che recommended guldelinee eetabliehed for arterial roadways. These configurations could assets both operation and design problems which will be difficult to mitigate. In addition, the cit iee along the Route 30 corridor have iong proceeded with their General Plnn programs with the aeeumpt LOn that the freeway would include interchanges proposed in rho one-mile altecnative. The two-mile alternative would, therefore, be inconeietant with land use and clYCUlation elements of local General Plane. Lastly, with the rapidly proceeding growth in the areas o£ Upland, Rancho Cucamonga, Pontana, and Rialto; it is certainly Ceae ibis that prior to completion of the Route 30 exieneion project, these areas would moat likely certainly quality for the urban interchange spacing standards o£ the Pederal Highway Adminlatratlon. Ph O and F nd' g: A precise phasing schedule for the project hoe not yet been eetabliehed. It ie anticipated the final project daeign would be developed over a two- to four- year period following project approval and a five- to ten-yesr actual construct ian and development phcse. Referencing a preliminary estimate of potential Route 30 revenue sources that were included in a 1989 Arthur Young and Company study, it was indicated that revenue sources could be Combined to provide 8~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ROUTE 30 FAEENAY September 6, 1991 Pa9a . cuff iolent projeet funding. The conetruetion and aequleition of right-of-way tox the Full-Freeway •ltarnativa ie estimated [o be approximately 5719 million {1909) dollar. Theca monies would coma from State and Federal Highway Construction funds end various other funding sources which would include San Bernardino'• County Xeuure I eaUe tex rovenuee, developer fees, end eatabliahment of beret it assessment dLtricte. 0. Q~allsd comaant^ and Racommendat ionse A detailed list of eammant• end concerns organised by corresponding EIR/6IS octions la contained in Exhibit "A" of the Planning Commission wia ff ~ m~« wad wM w.Fd Aww«.. s... .._..:•..r_~,Cr- Reep ly 8 ltted Bra 8 City leaner eB: Lkxj• Attechmente: Dznft Reaponwe Letter for Mayar'• Signature Planning Commission Staff Aeport dated August 2B, 1991 Historic Preserver ion Commie ion Draft Approved kotiope Planning Comaieeion Draft Approved Motions Letter frao Sam Na loOf'• Attorney 9~ September 4, 1991 MY. Steven L. Eael Route 30 Comments CALTAAN DISTRICT NO. 8 P.O. Box 233 San Bernardino, CA. 92402 SVBJECT: ROUTE 30 ENYIRONMHNTAL IMPACT REPORT/STATEMENT - COMMENTS FROM TH6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA Dear Nr. Reel Tha city Of Rancho Cucamonga ie excudingly pleased to haw received the draft environmental Impact Report/9tetamant concerning the Roub 30 Freeway Extension project. As you azs aware thin project has bun planned for acme time and is a long needed and awaited lmprovemeni to the regional circulation eyatem ae well ae a benefit to the City'• own local system. The Clty of Rancho Cucamonga hoe long supported, and continues to support, the Route 30 Freeway Corridor project. Please consider the attachetl detailed coamuent• and concerns ae providing a constructive dialogue to improve and strengthen the draft Enviroruoental Impact Report/Statement. If you need any further clarlticationa or have questions concerning our comments please contact City Planner Brad Bullet or Principal Plannet Larry Henderson at (714) 999-1861. Sincerely, Dennis L. Stout Mayor Attachments DLS:ja (/ vu a yr nniv..,nu vva,nirau,v ur. STAFF REPORT DATE: August 2B, 1991 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Huller, City PlanneY BY: Larry J. Henderson, Principal Planner M. ~ T n~ U SUBJECT: CONE IOB RAT ION OF FORMAT. RESPONSE TO ROUTE 30 B%12NSION EHVI RCNMENTAL m /p.n.~n rovmtmn• pY wm lp~p lp~pl ABSTRACT: The purpose of this report ie to consider formulating a draft response for City Council's consideration on September 6, 1991, concerning the draft Route 30 Extension EIR/EIS. In addition to the Planning Com:isaion's review and reco®endatlon to the City Council, two other City Commissions :uve or are considering tha draft EIR/EIS. The two Com:iaeione ara: The Historic Preservation Commission and the Public Safety Commission. It should be noted that the Historic Preeervetlon Commission has scheduled a special meeting on August 27, 1991, to consider the cu ltuznl resources m cantalned within this report. Any changes, alterations, or additions to the cultural resources portion of this report will be reported on orally tc the Planning Coamisaion. BACKGROUND: A. Draft EIR/EIS: The Oraft EIR/EIS for the Route 30 Freeway Extenfl ion has been released by the Department of Transportation for public coament. The deadline for responding to the Draft EIR/EIS is September 15, 1991. Aa stated un 7eye S-r of the EIA/EIS, the proposed project is intended to achieve the fol Loving objectives: 1. Establish and enhance a major east-west Gravel corridor to alleviate projected traffic congestion on parallel routes such as Route e6 and the I-10 Freeway. 2. Reduce travel time on the corridor. 3. Provide an important link in the regional highway system by connecting the existing I-215 and I-10 Freeway, thereby providing more direct access between San Bernardino and I.os Angeles's Metropolitan areas. B. General Plan Conais tency:~~ The p[oposed Route 30 Freeway Sxtena ion has been planned for within the City's General Plan since the First formal plan adoption in 1986. As stated in the Circu laiion Implementation Se ctiort on Page III-32 of the General Plan, "Foothill Freeway Corridor. The development of a high speed limited access route along the foothill Freeway Corridor is an important component to the circulation system of the City. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ROUTE 30 EIR/EIS - CLTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA an ~.gt 3B. 1?g! Pace 2 The City policy atreasea the need for the development of an access control high speed Facility along this corridor. Should Caltrana wi thdrav from theme development of a Foothill Freeway, the City will evaluate other methods Por development of the high speed corridor. Any changes in the City's policy should be reflected in revisions to the General PLan." With this foundation firmly established, it should be noted that the City's response to the draft EZR/EIS is Snlended to be supportive of the overall project. The comments generated from the City, therefore, are intended to be presented in an atmosphere of cooperation when clarifying issues and concerns of particular relevance to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. EIA/EIS Protect Rm.m+.o. ame e,.w~e-~ .....:-.._____.__. .__.._... .. primary alternatives. The first ie a no project alternetive,~the~aewnd~ie full freeway development, and the third is a Preaway/expressway. A no project alternative le self-explanatory. The full freeway alternative involves the development of a grade separated freeway along the entire length of the Acute 30 Corridor. This freeway would provide three general purpose lanes plus one high occupancy vehicle (tlOV) lane in each direction. The Freeway wau ld connect the existing Acute 30 Freeway Prom its existing terminus at Foothill Boulevard (Route 66) in La Verne, to the L-215 freeway in San Bernardino. The freeway/expressway alternative would be the same as described for the full freeway alternative from the western portion of Route JO between Route fib and I-215. However, the eastern portion of Route 30 between I-16 and I-215 would be an at-grade six lane expressway with controlled access nt signalized intersections. It should be noted that several sub-alternatives have been and are still being studied for the full freeway and freeway/expressway alto rnativea. D. Unresolved Issues: According to the environmental document, several issues remain unresolved. These issues are of a design nature according to the EIR/EIS. The two major issues affecting the City of Rancho Cucamonga are: 1. Interchange spacing, i.e., the provie ion of one-mile spaces for interchanges as previously planned for in the City of Rancho Cucamonga versus the Federal tlighway Administration's standard of requiring a minimum two-mile separation between interchanges in rural area9. 2. A request by the City of Fontana to provide direct access to Cherry Avenue from Route 30. Both Caltra~ artd the Federal Nighway Administration believe an interchange at Cherry Avenue could pose operational problems for the Route 30/I-15 interchange by providing an arterial interchange within a freeway-to-Freeway interchange. As indicated on Page 5-14 of the subject document, "Further analysis of the above noted design issues remain underway. These Laeues will be Eu lly addrea sad and reeo lved prior to completion of the final. environmental documentation. Oche[ unresolved design issues, such as the location of frontage roads, park and ride lots, and the identification of borrow sites ~3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ROUTE 30 EIR/EIS - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Auyuat , 1991 Page 3 ~ for fill material, etc., are being addressed in cooperation with corridor citie9. These is sues will be resolved in conjunction with the final project design and would be aubj act to separate environmental documentation." ANALYSIS: Full Freeway Alternative: AB indicated in the attached August 15, 199!, Memorandum fmm City Engineer Jo¢ O'Neil (Exhibit "B"1, T,he Euh freeway alternative i9 supported by the Engineering Division and the Public Safety Conmission (at it's Auquet 6, 1991 meeting) with the mitigation measures _c_- "*= h¢st. interest of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The full freeway ^alternative 18 shown in the attached copy of eayure .-~ ..r. .- EIR/EIS and shows the location of elevated and depressed aegmenta•of the freeway as well ae the propoeed intetchan9e locations. Figure 2-2 illuetratea a typical freeway section of this alternative. A sub-a Lternative that 19 can side red within the environmental document is a full freeway with a modLfled two-mile interchange apse ing. Ae shown an the attached Table 2-3r this alternative would remove Snterchangee propoeed at Carnelian and East Avenues. It should be noted that with a modified two- mile interchange alternative, increased congestion would Likely be experienced on the arterials accommodating the diverted traff lc volumes requiring the affected cities to provifle additional arterial capacity. The arterial lane configurations required to revive this needed Capacity is in excess of their recovmended guldelinee established for arterial roadways. These conf iqurat ions could create both operational and design problems which will be difficult to mitigate. In addition, the widening of arterial roads beyond their planned widths may involve significant impacts upon local communities (e.g., residential and comaercial diaplacemb :t ). Further, the cities sl ono the Route 30 Corridor have long proceeded with their general plan programs with the assumption that the freeway wow id include interchanges propoeed in the one-mile alternative. The two-mile alternative vould, therefore, be incons isteni with land use and cirCe lotion elements of Local general plane. It should be noted that urban development is proceeding rapidly in the areas of Upland, Rancho Cucamonga, Fontana, and Rialto which are the cities affected by the two-mile alternative. Significant furore development ie projected to occur in these areas pursuant to the local general plane. Therefore, prior to completion of the Route 30 Extension proj act, these areas would moat certainly qualify for the urban intetchan9e spacing standards of the Federal Highway Administration. Phasing and Fundins: Although a precise phasing schedule for the project has not yet been estab Liehed, it is antic lpated the final project design would be developed over a two- to four-year period following project approval. It is estimated that the full freeway alternative would moat likely occuz in stages beginning in areas where travel demand is greatest, the project coULd, therefo ra, ew lve into a five- to ten-year development. ~~ PLANNING COMNISSION STAFF REPORT ROUTE JO EIR/EIS - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA eug~3st TN, 7997 Page 4 The construction end right-of-way costa for the full freeway alterneti ve is estimated to be approximately $719 million (1989) dollars. This includea• approximately $106 million right-of-way mete and about $615 million in covet suction costa. In addition to monies fray state and federal highway construction funds, various othe[ funding eourcea could include Ean Bernardino County's Measure I sales tax revenues, developer fees, and the es tabliahmsnt of benefit assessment districts. According to a preliminary estimate of potential Aoute 30 revenue eourcea included in a 19&9 Arthur Young 6 Company study St was indicated that these revenue eourcea could be combined to provide aufPlclent project funding. concerns organized •by ^correepondinq BIR/EIS`"sections X18+ con[nlned in Sxhiblt "A" attached hereto for consideration end recd®endetion. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recd®enda the Planning Co®ieaion consider the attached Exhibit "A" containing deieiled comments and recommendations concerning the draft ESA/EIS and make a rewamendation to the City Council fox their consideration at their September d, 1991 meeting. Reaps sub d, 4 Brad B er City Planner BB: WH/jfs Attachments: Figure 2-1 - Proposed Freeway Alternative Figure 2-2 - Typr cal Freeway Cro98-Section Table 2-3 - Interchange Spacing Alternatives Exhibit "A" - Detailed List of Comments and Concerns Exhibit 'S" - Memo Erom Joe O'Neil dated Auyust 15, 1991 J ~ _ ~ W i C 1 "' " ' ~ ? w t u LL w , ~ a w W J ~ J i a a a ~ LL ~ ~ ~ 3 3 O Y ~ ~i 2- ~ Novcncnm 1 uro-~owr FlOURE 2-2 ROUTE 30 FULL FREEWAY OR FREEWAY/EXPRESSWAY ALTERNATIVE TYPICAL FREEWAY SECTION MY~v/011Wr1 ~J Mrilrsw~/w~Fnp~.w ~~/A / ~.a ~ _~ TABLE 2-3 INTERCHANGE SPACING ALTERNATIVES • wo-Mil~- "One-Mile" Alternative Modified Alternative fn[erchange Locations Interchange Locatinns Foothill Boulevard Foothill Boulevard Fruit Street Fruit Street Towne Avenue Towne Street Padua Avenue Padua Avenue Mountain Avenue Mountain Avenue Campus Avenue Campus Avenue Carnelian Avenue Archibald Avenue Haven Avenue Milliken Avenue Day Creek Boulevard Easr Avenue I-IS Freeway " Beech Avenue Citrus Avenue Sierra Avenue Alder Avenue Ayala Avenue Riverside Avenue Pepper Avenue State Street Arcibald Avenue Haven Avenue Milliken Avenue Day Creek Boulevard I-l3 Freeway • Beech-Citrus ' Sierra Avenue Alder-Ayala [2] Riverside Avenue State Street • Freeway-to-[reeway intechange •• Split-diamond intercMnges Eze:e:T ^A" DETAILED LIBT OF COIO~NfB AND CONCERNS 3 9 $ - NOI86 86TTIN0 A. Osvsral Ae noted In the 8IA/BIS Adminietrative Oraft, Technical Report G was not Lneludsd; therefore, no Information was available on location, design, or alight of proposed sound walla. Therefore, ihs City of Rancho Cucamonga would like to formally request a copy of Technical Report o, in particular, those sections pert loco[ to the City of Rancho Cucasonga. The City reeervee the nnm.t unl ~., ~.. s.... ne. __._.._.._ _ __ ....... .~.......~o. Aaport hu bean eubmltbd to the Clty. A. Oeasnl The paragraph on Rancho Cucamonga on Pags 3-62 should kw corrected to read: "Rancho Cucamonga has completed updating it'• General plan as of the Spring on 1990. Tha proposed Route 30 corridor continues to be shown Ln the latest circulation element to support plan land uses end to improve access to existing freeway systems." a.l.l - errECxs A. Dave ral Corevte It should be noted that although the proposed corridor has been in the planning stages for more Lhan 30 years and potentially affected property owners along the corridor hove long been aware of the poesibillty for project construction, the visual impact of that construction ie certainly not common knowledge to the population that will be affected by said project. In addition it should 6e noted that in the City o£ Rancho Cucamonga (as Lndlcnted in previous sectiona of the 6IR/EIS) has undarcone dramat lc increase in residential construction and the accompanying new population. This trend ie oleo indicated to be an on-going dynamic e Ltuation and therefore, it should be fully noted in the 6IR/EIS that a eignif treat number of new members of the population may be totally unsware of the freeway project development. The correct reference in the ftret sentence of the third paragraph on Page d-1 should be Figure Z-1 and not Figure 2-Z. ~9 6.1.2. - NEA6 S TO NSNSNIfE BARN A. Ogaeral Considerable diecuesion iq given to conaiderat LOn of the visual impacta of the Route 30 freeway construct ion ae contained in Pagaa 4-1 through 6-7 of the EIR/EI$. In terms of impacta to the city of Rancho Cucamonga, [hoes ~ impacta can be delineated into Cwo categories. The firm category 1• the aesthetic view and imago portrayed to those traveling on the freeway through the City of Rancho Cucamonga The aeeond category are those residents who view those sect ions of the freeway which ore above grade, primarily reaiderts within the City of Aancho Cucamonga that are living near the freeway or traveling on local and arterial streets. It ie therefore somewhat disconcerting to see the[ the mitigation meeeurea contained on Paga d-8 appear to place all signif !rani mitigation measures ri.e icoat ameneiee involved. The city of Rancho Cucamonga would like to ¢ee two mitigation measures addetl to Section 6.1.2. Thasa Condit lone ace ea follows: 1. Coltrane will be responaibls for developing within each local jurLsdict ion a Naabr Plan of Landscaping and !n some roses, irrigation for ultimata implementation by both Coltrane and the local juriadict ion. 2. At a minimum, the general landseepe theme shoultl utilise large cocks, boulders, and aigntticant massing of tread end shrubs similar to that Eound on a mountains ids and previously implemented by Coltrane at the 210 and 605 freeway in<erchanges in the County of Los Mgelae. This mitigation will go a long way In mittgat ing the Loas of view of Rancho Cucamonga Peak and adjacent hillaidse. In addition, this mitigat ton measure would dovetail with mitigations already called out in the EIA/EIS for replacement and retention of biological resources identified i.n the right-of-way in the City of Aancho Cucamonga (see Figures 6-6 through 4-11 of the EIR/EISi. Add the following Line to the fire[ sentence of the mit igatlon measure on Page 4-38, aeeond paragraph from the bottom: "By a qualified arbor Lot who shall document the epeciea and size (i.e., diameter at breast, high crown width, and heights." d.ll. - PAAIIE AND RECR611TION A. 6.11.1 Effeet• - Trails Please correct Ta61e 4-12, Trail Croaeinga, by adding the propoeetl Eaet Avenue Bike Trail with a corresponding grade separation at the Eaet Avenue overcroesing. A copy of the city's Exhi6 it labeled Figure 7, cenerel eikawaye Plan, is attached for reference. 8. 6.11.2 Npmres to N1alaisa Nary The City of Rancho Cucamonga requeeta that a mitigation measure 6e added to Chia section address ing the need to design the project to accommodate all trails listed in Table 4-L2. / ~~ 9 1 SNTOnDe(.ltnN awn A. 8umearq Providing an important seat-west thoroughfare, Route 30 will eventually extend eastward in the City of Rancho Cucamonga along the historic corridot of Highland Avenue. This extension has been a part of local and state planning since its adoption in 1949, its suspension in the late 1970x, and its rejuvenation in the mid-1980x. Although much of the material culture of the citrus industry which prospered along the Foothills has been destroyed or significantly altered, significant elements remain and some stantl to be iapacted by the freeway's extension. Review of such reaourcea to data has utilized National Register Guidelines, per Section 106 and NEPA (National Envi rormiental Policy Act), co determine five historic reaourcea in Rancho Cucamonga eligible for the Register. "`' ~`- "-'-'-' ''Uy..a,,.." Cv. uwse iumu.iuea ease cegin to address the'range and severity of potential impacts, there are no provisions mode Eor the monitoring and reporting as specified in AB 3180. A number of resources in the Alta Loma and Etiwanda communities which lie along Highland Avenue and various intersections have not bean included in the review psocesa thus far. Per CEQA's (California Bnvi ronmental puality Act) Appendix G, Item J, a project impacting historic or cultural resources important to a community ox group should analyze and when necessary provide mitigations fox such resources. Furthermore, there a:ists no denotation of the location of the eight archneol.ogical sites reviewed for the project, see Section 3.7.1., and thus it is difficult to assess these potential resources per CEQA. 9.3 DTSCTJSSION Dr anRTe an een vnw ..... .,"" -_______ .._. ______ A. General Comments Five Aancho Cucamonga properties were identified as eligible for the National Register: the Sam and Alfredo Maloof House and Norkahop; the Herbert and Evelyn Goerlitz House; the Tsle House; the Ernst Muel for House; and the eucalyptus trees of Che Etiwanda Nindbreak Aural Historic Landscape. Some major issues surrounding the ultimate character of the freeway--such as interchange spacing and full freeway oz freeway/expressway--have yet to be finalized. Since the EIR/EIS has been drafted assuming a full freeway configuration with one-mile interchange spacing through the City, subsequent decisions altering these assumptions would zequi re further investigation to determine potent lal irt~acts. The City of Rancho Cucamonga supports the full Freeway Alternative vith complete interchanges at 1 mile intervals as shown in the City's General Plan. The Alternate Interchange Alternative would remove the Carnelian Street and East Avenue interchanges and therefore is inconsistent with the City's Plan. Although the impact on two eligible res ouzces, the landmarked Palms and Eucalyptus trees and the Mueller House, would be reduced, it is unclear what effecia the lack of an interchange would have on nearby streets, in particular on Etiwanda Avenue, and therefore possibly other cultural reaourcea. For all but the Mueller House, the freeway as i[ is currently proposed would have resolute effecia on these five identified properties and thus require specific mitigation measures. The "Draft Finding of Effects" found Ghat the freeway's construction would have an "adverse effect" on all of the sites and proposed a variety of mitigation measures. The draft EIR/EIS /A/ explores s variety of alternativea, including often the moat ext rema, 'No Projsct" and •^_onylete Freeray Rsaiignmwnc.° Further anelyaie rhich Poiiora suggests further mitigation meaaurea. A. Nature aa6 Adaquacp oL Pxopowd Yitigationa Dioparty: Taw Sam and Alfredo Maloof evaidwn~w G Studio In Q_161 Impact: The Maloof property lies di tectly in the propoaed path of the e:tenaion undez both the Full Freeway and Freeray/Expre Daway alternativea, taking approxlmetely 3.8 of the total 5.1 acre site. g ~N~ eY „- iy.: _~__. v,v .i 61w mUinati nn IMaeuzeD - including Che zelocation of the et tucturea, a minor alignment change and coact ruction of a retaining wall; and HASS-quality documentation prior to relocation of demolition Of the atrvctutea. Recommendations: Repcesenta[ivea fzom the City, Caltrsns, $ANBAG, Federal Nighway Coaaaiaaion, the Maloof family, and others met doting the first three months of 1991 to diacuaa a full range of mitigation options to minimize Che freeway's impact on this very significant and complete cultural and aesthetic zeaoucce. Moat of the alternativea discussed during these aieetinga axe not presented in the draft environmental documentation, including the combination preferred by the Nnloof'a, of alignment adjustment, relocation of the Maloof family, and eatabliahment of a museum/cultural center. These kinds of mit igationa should be completely addressed prior to finalization of ouch documentation and a thorough mitigation monitoring and reporting progzam developed £or the decided mitigations. P lop arty: Taw Nwrtw rt and Evelvn C erl itz Hnuaa lo. 9-101 Impact: Moat iP not all of the site's Betting and rontext rould be destroyed by the propoaed freeray--3.2 of 4.4 acres. A eucalyptus-lined drive, providing acceaa and a at rong historic sense of entry, along witR an aged oak, and moat of the original tit rue groves would be zemoved. Prozimity to the southern right-of-way would cause amch greater unattenuatad noise levels and place the Front of the some and business rithin 90 feet of the pavement. Proposed Mitigations: A proposed zealignment affecting both the Maloof and the Goezlitz hawse rould reduce the distance between the fLOnt (north( aide of [he house and the pavement would ba increased to 110 feet. A 16-foot sound wall and/or landscape buffer are also proposed as roll as xAES-quality documentation if significant alteration or demolition occur. /~~ Recoarwndations: Every efFort should be made to preserve, maintain, and protect during constructlan the maruze oak ana as much of the existing grove as possible. Since the Full Freeway alternative rould eliminate the site's current acceaa and inhibit Sia current use, a detailed plan Poi ner acceaa rhich includes appropriate landscaping mirroring the hiator3,e design should be developed. A complete mitigation monitoring and reporting program should also be developed for the property prior to finalization of the EIR/EIS. Property: .I ,,,o. r~4.__._C -fie Impact: Situated on an 18.9-acre site, the home lien directly in the proposed freeway pnth, and Cha draft EIR/EZS calla out for its removal or dwmnlihl nn Proposed Mi tigatione: A vaguely worded statement regarding the relocation of the home along rlth NABS-quality documentation is proposed. Recomaendeti one: The effects of a poaaible realignment did not receive the detailed treatment those for the Maloof residence did (maps, calculat lone of displaced individuals, cost, loss of structures). No mention of the existing satiing--the entrance palms , the windrors--occurs in the document, These coot ributinq resources should be relocated as well. Furthermore the writers of the environmental document state that "relocation of the house may rasa it in the removal of one or more mature Eucalyptus trees from the perimeter of ai te,^ without explaining this statement. The Rome and the palm's relocation should be sponsored by the lead agencies and ba carefully and thoroughly advertised with preference given to property owners in the Etiwanda community. A detailed mitigation acnitorin9 and reporting program should also be completed prior to a final determination of mitigations. Droperty Impact: The proposed East Avenue eastbound off-ramp as well as the southern pnvement edge will impact the home. Proposed Mitigations: The craftsman home is not included in the mandated 4f Reviev and no mi tlgationa were proposed, although a standard 16' soundwall would be constructed. Recommendations: In the •~raft Finding of Effects," measures suggested to reduce the freeray's impact on the Mueller house included the relocation of the Eaat Avenue interchange and the construction of a noise barrier along [he northern property boundary. However, the draft EIR/EIS omitted the site from revier under Section 41f ), asserting that although /D 3 the historic character of the property could be d±m+_ni whed by indirect nose a.^.^_ vijusl impacts, these effects would not substantially impair the site's historic character. After a careful review, the City proposes no further mitigations. Property: TF_n Ft+ da W' h k R 1 x' i impact: The freeway as it is proposed would remove 35 acres, about 6,340 linear feet of eucalyptus windrows. Proposed Hitigati ons: No specific mitigations are proposed in the document, rather relocation and replacement of taken windrow era said to be "under conai deration." Reconmenda ti ons: Mith respect to the windbreaks, the City's E.: W.".+^ ~oeni£ic plan calla out for eucalyptus windrows to be replaced at a 1;1 ratio and thus the 5:1 ratio is unacceptable by our City's atandards. Moreover, as designated Landmarks, the Palm trees along H ighlend Avenue should alsc be subject to mitigations which would reduce the proposed f reaway's impact. It seems plausible to mitigate the retention and relocation of as many palms in the right of way as possible. Any and all mitigations should be carefully detailed and the lead agencies should provide fot the environmental review proceaa as detailed under CEQA, a full mitigation monitoring and reporting plan. ANALYSIS OY ODIIDtNTIPI=D LOCAL R=90ORCt3 AND PROPOB=D MITIGATIONS G~netel Comwat• State architectural historians from Cal trans and their consultants surveyed each potentially historic site built prior to 1946 within 500 feet of the proposed freeway's centerline and produced a ^Histo rical Architectural Survey Re onrt ." ^nder NEPA this review utilized Naticna'_ Aegi Ater Guideiinea, per Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Acte and thus sought to deterndne potential eligibility for the Register for each of the surveyed sites. A number of the City's local resources, then, fell below the National Register's significance standard used by State historians in their review but still stand to be i[spacted by the proposed freeway extension. under CEQA the project's EIR/E IS would have to take into account the proposed freeway's impact on at ructures deemed significant or potentially significant by local atandards. Colt rans officials have claimed that NEPA can supersede CEpA in projects funded in part by the Federal Government. The City's legal Counsel has concurred with Ghat of the California Preservation Foundation in determining that CEQA standards for cultural resource review apply to this freeway project. The ineligible surveyed resources in the Alta Loma and Et iwanda communities which lie along Highl antl Avenue and various intersections are from Nest to East: the Ellen Loeb House, 9911 Highland Ave.; the Hilleman Residence, 10067 Highland Ave.; the N. N. Minor Residence, 10304 19th 9t ree*_; the Gosney Ranch, 6422 Haven; Caaaletti's Polka Palace, 12533 Highland Ave.; the Ross House, 6527 Etiwandn Ave.; the Hemp House, 13151 Highland Ave.; and the Tibbetts House, 13710 Highland Ava. /~ lion-aigniticaaC 8trucknru /isles Dtop~rky: Thw Ellen Lneb ~ _ .h lend prw Inspect: It appears thnt the proposed freerap right of line folio just on oc directly south of this site. Thus the freeway would have a seveze impact on the site and it is probable Chat the site could be y destroyed. Moreover, the freeway alignment begins a 1.59\ climb from a -0,47 depression at tae Arohibald intersection and the grade difference between the existing landform (noted on the includetl mope' cross-aecticn with a dotted linet is approximately 35 feet. TAerefote if the right of way does not ^take• the at cuctures on the Loeb site, the construction of a retaining/sound wall seemingly could alter irrevocably the resource. Thera exists a et song possibility that the freeway ql• iro ::yac3 to r•7^^~ ~tw iawaet on the • GOerlitz properties end at tale time it Maloof and remains difficult to sasses the final ivq:adt of the proposed trearay. Proposed fii tigariom: None Recomrtgndati ons: According to the state's :eaearch, the Loeb site has undergone significant alterations, Although potentially significant duo to the scope of its uses, Sncluding workers' housing it is questionable waethex the site would meet local landmark criteria. Arop~tYy: Ir~act: Tae proposed right of way bisects Chia site and as vith the Loeb site discussed previously any freeway realignment could alter tae site's final shape. Proposed Hi tigatiOns: None Recomrnerdati ons: Staff eoncuxs with the finflinq's of Caltrans' historians: "Toss house ass been altered sc substantially that it is difficult to assess its original appearance,^ and taexefore does not xecoamnnd any maigations. Propatty: Tha N- N. M~mr wsiden e. ta3ad la A ctr w Zmpact: The £ull freeway alternative appears to require a major portion of the e:ietinq lemon grove above the Minor home. Proposed Hits gals ons: None Raco:mendati one: The Minor family decidedly played a significant role in the development of Alta Loms and the structure's use ae an egg ranch is an ezample of a use rhich is now very race in our rapidly suburban a sea. Furthermore, tae houseb setting, a leaven glove, is as the Architectural Snventory a[atee; a / ~/~J C very [are example of what vas historically the moat u uuimGn iar.3 use pattern alen7 me foothills. Ne encoucage the lead agencies to leave as much as possible of the grove intact. Dloperty: She 6oanev Ran h. 6322 Havwn Infect: The proposed fceeray would locate this site over 50 . feet below the fceeray and di cectly north of [he rnatbounQ on-ramp and directly rest of Che eastbound oEf-ramp, Propoaetl Ni tigationa: None Reconmendati ona: Purther research has determined that the one-time ranch does not cetain a great level of significance oz integrity. Propeity: The Nhbefta Hnnee. In av nngn.a nn :. e Irlg~act: The home would sit just below Lreeray level directly south of the off-ramp leading to the north-bound Inte[atate 15, and thus be impacted by the freeway`s construction. Proposed Nitigations: None Raconanendationa: The at ructure has been al [aced on numa[oua occasions and its significance does not appeal to be of local Landmark quality at Chia time. Sigalticaat or Potentially 6igaiticaat Iaipaeted Stteetares/Site^ Prop arty: C • 1 tN '• P lk P law ]2503 H'ahl nd aven+ Impact: The fceeray as proposed would lie approximately 150 feet no rtn of Casal atti'a; and although not directly impacted, the structures would decidedly be effected by the fceeray, Proposed Mitigations: None Recammendati ona: Casaletti's is an institution of local importance and a potential Local Landmark. access to this complex is currently uncl ear and should be determined prior to finalization of the environmental review process. Theca also might e:iat archaeological depoalts of significance about which the City should be infocmed. PioperEy: The Rm• No +aw. 65 7 iron a ave. Impact: The house would sit within 50 teat of the fceeray and approximately 20 feet above fceeray grade. The proposed freeway as yell as conat ruction of a barrier/soundwall would seem to impact this site. Access to the home also is ambivalently defined, as it is not clear how or if Highland avenue will continue along this section, Proposed Mitigations: None ~O~ Reconmendett one: The Roaa family figured significantly in Pt!vacda'3 7istcry and despite the lass of the front porch ertd related outbuildings, the family home remains locally signi Ei cant. Ne concur with State architectural hiatoriana rho found chat the Aoaa home had lost mush oP Che Aoas family-era details-- the large Front porch, context, the outbui ldin~s, citrus groves, and other agriculturally-related elements. However, !t does fall within the parameters of the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance, and is list ed sa a Potential Local Landmark, and deserves mitigations under CEpA. we recommend Chat prior to the completion of thin review process, mitigation languago be provided that compenaatea for the taking of the properties windrow per a replacement program based on City standards and that matteza of access are more clearly defined. A m~~`;_t!c: - wring and reporting program could also be included. property: Thw ~~ Hnuae. 13151 H1 ahlanA Avw. Tngoact: The eastbound freeway off-ramp as propwed could lie 20 feet below and abut the property and thus bring the house approxiamtely rithin 30 feet of the off-ramp. TAe Bite would thus seem to be impacted elgniEicantly. It le elan unclear at this time the ultimate configuration of Highland Avenue and therefore eccaaa to the home is ill-defined. proposed Nt [tgattons: None Recommendations: Like the Aosa Nome, the Ramp family home atanda as a reminder of Etiranda`a citrus legacy--perhaps an incomplete remainder, having loaf an elaborate porch and significant outbuildings, but a locally significant structure all the same. Although the State findings seem to downplay the importance and longevity o£ the Femp family in Etiranda, it is true that the structure iwelf and its context have been altered and that these alterations have not achieved any keen historical sense of their own. Like Casaletti'a and the Rosa House, this Home is on the Ci[y'a Historic Property Survey. Ne recommend that the questions of access be defined clearly and that a aui table snd dense landscape buffer planted to mitigate the visual i~act of the freeway. v / ~iis ~r rtNiv~n~~u~rsmvivi;n MED'IOR~ND~dA~veo CITV OF AANGHO C! ICAMONOA ~~~.:~p,'aJ D:15;ON GATE: August 15, 1991 AU6 151991 AM ' T0: Larry Henderson, Principal Plann~l~lu1~111~1~16 FROM: Joe O'Neil, City Engineer '~ ! BV: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Route 30 Freeway Environmental Impact Report The above-referenced EIR/Et5 is rrow under public review, with comments due by September 15, 1991, to Caltrans 1n San Bernardino. The Engineering Division is completing its review of the report and will have final comments available by August 21. The report was given to the PuD11c Safety Coawisslon at its August 6 meeting, with the request that comments be sent to Engineering. The Commission generally supports the full freeway alternative with mitigation measures as best for our City. The Commission decided not to hold a workshop on the subject due to the short Lime before the need to SUbmiL COalaent5. Wh11e continuing our review for the presence of errors or needed information or mitigations from the circulation standpoint, 1t can be said now that the report analyzes the option which has long been the desire of the City Council. Th15 1s the full freeway alternative w/th complete interchanges at Carnelian Street, Archibaid, Haven and Milliken Avenues, Day Creek Boulevard and East Avenue. Other alternatives are also examined as required Dy law and Federal direction. Our comments and any received from others will be reported to you as available. WJO:PAR:sd cc: Paul A. Rougeau /D 8" Exkl~T~g~ HISTORIC PAESERVATION COMHISSTON ACTIONS RELATIVE TO THE ROUTE 30 EIR/ET9 August 27, 1991 MOTLON: Movetl by Preston, seconded by Cooper, carried 6-0-1, that the Hieratic Preaervatlon Comoiu ion acwpt the staff report of August 27, 1991, and Forward it to City Council reiterating the Lmportance of Che following: 1) the mitlgat lone meaeune be mace eompleGly detailed and morn thoroughly analysed by Coltrane, and 2) a specific timeline accomPanY the imDlementN ion ns .+.. ~s «___ „,...,,..,,, AYES: COMMISSIONERS! ARNER, BILLINGSr COOPER, NASAVITE, PRESTON, SCNNIDT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BANKS -carristl MOTION: Novad by Preston, seconded by elllingo, carried 6-0-1, with respect [o epeeif is mitigation measures provtdsd Eor the Maloof house, that further tlocumantat ion be providetl Ln the SIR regarding the unique historical and architectural etgniflcance of that property and that more samplers detailing of specific mitigation measures be provided which should include !tams listed in the staff report as wall ae a life aerate, phasing the freeway Lmprovemente to provide the meximum amount of Lime for the property owner, and a more detailed coneitleration of the many faeete of the proposed mitigations, especially with regnrd to the museum cultural center alternatives. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: AANER, BILLINGS, COOPER, HASKVITZ, PRESTON, SCHMIDT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMNISSIONERS: BANKS -carried ~d 9 PLANNING CONNISSION ACTIONS RELATIVE TO THE AOUTE 30 EIR/EIS Auquat 28, 1991 ~ NOTION: Moved 6y Nelchsr, eacondad by Chit lea carried 5-0, that the Planning Commission accept the staff report of Auquat 28, 1991, and Eotward Lt to City Council reiterat lnq their conearna over the importance of the following: 1) the mitigation of extreme wind conditions which will axlst, 2) the mlcigetion of drainage and flooding conearna due to topographic naiura of the lend forma tnB ETaaW.aV VI11 nTn 9~ •F~ -AA 1 ~- -~~-~~~ ~,ullur u ul4lYVal Uw whin city opposition is known (city of RanehoY Cucamonga would oppose nny Gil lboards along the corridor), and 4) the addrnaing of design/uathatica of all engineered structures with mitigntion being consultation with local agencies on final design. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CNITIEA, NCNIEL, l~LCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMNISSIONER9: NONE A85ENT: COt41I SSIONERS: NONE -carried MOTION: Moved by Valletta, eacondad by Chitisa, carried 4-1, that because o£ concerns of aesthetics of the community end wind conditions and a request to 6e treated with the cams consistency with other comounit ias, the City of Rancho Cucamonga fully supports a recessed freeway wherever pouib le. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CNITIEA, MCNIEL, NELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERSt NELCHEA ABSENT: COMMISSIONBRS: NONH -cart ied l~~ a~-G 2~ '?t ld~23 S.E"'GN ~_nFSE"~ ».iPSn Y E M O E a E D O M 9lamon rear i arah To: Eaaoao Cuoamoaga City Couaoil Aaaepo Cuouoaga plaaDiaq Oouiaates Raaopo Cueamoaga Eistorie Cmissioa FROM: ]tarp Lycra E. Co[faa DATE: Aagaat Za, 1193 RE: Commaats on Draft Eavirenmantsl Impact ~~y:.::j iw~i.w~ff i. wv. aew~-~.w-ifs-is-i-V Piaparaa for tpa AOata 30 Prepeaad pz'ojeot wa ara writing on 1»half of ouz clients, Sam and Alireda Maloof, to offer the following general comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report/Statement No. PMWA-CA- EIS-91-1-D (the "draft EIS^). pa ara currently preparing more in-depth legal comments to submit to the agencies that prepared the draft EIS (the "responsible aganeiea") by September 16, 1991. Eowavar, we would like you to consider the following comments. As we sea it, there are at least two major problems with the draft EIS: it does not appropriately recognize the priceless and irreplaceable nature of the Maloof studio, home and landscape; and it does not adequately reference and discuss all of the mitigation alternatives that have been and should be considered for the Maloof property. As you know, the Maloof home, studio and landscape are of the highest architectural, artistic, historical and cultural value. The house and studio are truly extraordinary in the intricacy and craft of their woodwork and design, making the buildings objects of art themselves. Further, the house and studio are filled with a wonderful and valuable coiiaction of art and craft nbjecta, Including woodworking pieces that Sam has created, and pieces that Sam has "traded for" with other woodworking craftparaons of his ara. Sam built the house and studio organically with the lemon trees, avocado trans and other landscape features of his property, room-by-room, over the last ~0 years. Sam's decisions on the design and materials of the house sera made in the context of the lanflscape setting on the property. Through this creative and artistic prOCaaa, the design of the house and studio has become a part of their landscape, just ae the landscape is now a part oP the house end studio. The entire property, Lha buildings anQ the grove, have served ae the milieu for Sam's creative efforts. Tha ^I.~NTf1~w~IINQJ,p~91a01f f®i ~~r :•~G ~_ '31 :0:?3 3IE^!r„p '_.:FSE:'~ ~MAFC~ property ae n whole ie the only place joined with same lifelong pursuit of art. Ths home anfl studio nestled in citrus groves have provided, and should continua to provide Sam with the environment that ha needs to perform his craft. All of these !actors, the nature of the home and studio, the importance of their setting, the connection of the entire property with sam Maloof, and the importance of the property to Sams ability to continue to work, combine to treats a treasure that Ss irreplaceable. Tha value to the public of this treasure should be explicitly recognized in the draft EIS. We encourage the City oY Rancho Cucamonga to suggest that thn draft EIS recognize the architectural, historical, artistic, and cultural significance of the Maloof h n.nC ••n,ii n anA 1 nwR......... The seconfl major problem with the draft EIS i^ its failure to adaguately explain all of the mitigation alternatives that might ba undertaken to reduce the destructive impact that the constrvction oY the freeway will have on the Maloof property. While the draft EIS brislly outlines soma oP the mitigation alternatives available, it does not list all of the mitigation alternatives that have bean eonaiderad and does not give a detailed diecumsion oP any alternative. of source, wa believe that the significance of the Maloof property warrants extraordinary avoidanoa measures. From our perspective, the bast measures would involve an alternative freeway design requiring the freeway to be constructed in such a way as not to impact the Maloof property at all. For instance, the cut-and-tunnel alternatives, the alternatives allowing realignment or redesign of the Preevay to miss the Maloof property, or the alternative not to build the freeway as it is currently planned would be ideal aolutiona. But there era also mitigation alternatives that should be considered which are not outlined in the draft EIS. specifically, the draft EIS fails to addreae a creative solution that will provide for the interests of the Maloof family, the intaraats of the public in the historical and architectural value of the property, and the interacts of the responsible agencies in meeting transportation needs. From the beginning, the Maloof~s have Yecognizsd that the proposed route 30 project implicated several interests. Tha ability to recognize all of thaas interests is to the Malools' credit, because it is difficult to recognize other interests when ones family interest in a home, property, lifelong career and family heritage of 40 years is threatened. As a result of their recognition of all the interests implicated in the project, the Maloofs, in good faith, have entered into discussions with several other agency representatives to explore a creative solution, in which ell interests would be met. ~iwni,wlunnmanmau.~ //d~ NV6 [d 91 15:G o. r .Y. L:~FSEr~ MFFSh Those discussions covered approximately fourtamn ditlerent mitigation alternatives, only a taw of which era outlined in any detail in the dratt Lis. one of those mitigation alternatives would provide for a sale of the property to the appropriate aganeiae, with provisions for the preservation by en appropriate historical or artistia loundation oY the Malool home and whatever grounds could ba saved from freeway destruction. Also, provisions to allow the Maloois to continue to occupy their property for the remainder of their lives, provisions to relocate the Maloois upon iraaway construction, provisions postponing construction of the portion of the freeway attectinq the Maloof property Por as long ae is ieasibla and prudent, and provisions Go realign the iraaway to save as much of the Maloof property ae 1 ~ Iaao/ M ~_ n.1 ...I~nr 1...r1. •.. ..w...., r.. e ~ _ a _ .... r ~C....... ~..~ ~.w.-. .. `Gvuis~ a nueaum end Por the Maloofs as long as they ocaupy~and work on the property, entered into the discussion of this mitigation alternative. These altarnstivee end the dieowsiona that generated them era not adequately described in the draft EIS. wa would like the City to encourage the responsible agencies at least to pursue a creative solution to avoid destruction of the Maloof property. Me would also like the City to encourage the responsible agencies to include and adequately explain all et the mitigation alternatives available, including the alternatives discussed above. Support for either of two typos of sltarnativas would ba helpful: 1) the design altarnstivee requiring the trseway to be constructed in a manner that would not impact the Maloof property at all; or 2) the mitigation alternativaa, including those discussed abova,~that would insure the least impact to the Maloof property by providing for: realignment of the iraaway so that it is as far from the hone and studio as possible, a delay in construction of the part of the iraaway that would impact the Meloot property, the retention by the Maloota of a life intsrest in their property, the praservatlon of the Maloof property as an artistic and historical treasure, appropriate consideration !or the Maloo! family interest in the property, and relocation of the Maloots should that bacons necessary. on behalf of the Maloofs, thank you for your consideration. ~ie1WPS1~l/AW Vp~D1910YWl.Aaal ~/3 - CITY OF RANCHO CIJCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 4, 1991 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Councirl ~,/ FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager ~J D O BY: Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: IIilTIAi. EVALUATION OF THE PILOT CURHBIDE RECYCI~iG PROGRAI[ It is recommended that the pilot curbside recycling program be extended to December 1991 and a second evaluation be conducted based on the additional data that is collected. BACSGROUND The City Council will recall that at its February 20, 1991 meeting, the Council approved the recommendation that a ptlot curbside recycling program be initiated. At that time, staff recommended that an evaluaton of the pilot program be conducted three months the pilot was initiated. the initial evaluation was to be conducted by the Environmental Management Commission. ANALYSIS The Environmental Management Commission evaluated the pilot curbside recycling program at its August 22, 1991 meeting. Staff provided the Commission with summary reports for the tndivldual geographic portions of the Clty on the pilot program and in general, the program has resulted in approximately 98 tons of commodity being recycled. Additionally, staff reported that due to the summer months and vacations by residents, the initial data received from the three-month pAot may have been skewed. The City's contract haulers and staff suggested that a more accurate evaluation of the pffot program should take place. ~~ Ir1I77AL EVALUATIOff OF T>~ PILOT CfJRH81Dli 86CYCLII~1O PROIiRAI[ September 4, 1991 Page 2 Staff also reviewed with the Commission that the proposed pohcy for AB 939 and comments and/or proposed changes to the policy wlll need to be finalized prior to assessing the pilot curbside program and making a recommendation to the City Council. The Commission therefore recommends to the C!ty Cotmcll that 1n additlon to the pilot program being extended through December 1991 that a second ieiier eagned by tite iviayor be sent to cue rea~dents on the puot program thanking them for theft voluntary partltlpatlon and also to encourage those residents not currently partidpating to do so. Attached to this second letter would be atear-oil' portlon to include survey questlona that wID assist staff rn assessing the pllot curbside program. The Commission would also like to include helpful hints on recycling !n the second letter signed by the Mayor. The Commission has also requested that the survey queatlona be forwarded to them once they are returned. The Commission will again re-evaluate the ptlot program at the end of the year and provide a recommendatlon to the City Councll. Attached for the Council's review are the staff reports from the Ctty Councll's February 20, 1991 meeting and the Commission's Aughst 22, 1991 meeting. Rges~p~ec~tfi/ill~y submitt~e~d, ~ Q~ I.fnda D. Daniels Deputy Clty Manager IDD/DO/pr 91-195 Attachment ~ls CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 20, 1991 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: PROPOSED PILOT CDRBBIDE RECYCLING PROfia AM Recommendation The Environmental Management Commission is recommending that the City Council consider implementing a pilot residential curbside recycling program and consider approving the allocation of an amount not to exceed $25,000 from special fund number 1-3901-4555. Backarouad Staff has conducted a number of preliminary meetings with the City's three contract haulers regarding developing and implementing a residential curbside recycling program. In addition, the contract haulers attended the Environmental Management Commission's January 24, 1991 meeting and presented a report to the Commission. Analvsia Initially, a pcrtion (approximately 1,000 homes) of each contract hauler's section of the City (residentially) will be included in the pilot program. The contract hauler is currently in the process of coordinating those homes for the voluntary program according to routing schedules. The contract hauler will coordinate the curbside collection with the resident's regular trash collection day. it is recommended the pilot program run for approxi~uately three months. Following the initial three months, an evaluation of the program will be performed by the Environmental Management Commission with an eye toward improving, modifying, and/or expanding the program. Additionally, the contract haulers have suggested a one bin system which would include the collection of newspaper, aluminum, plastic, glass and bi-metal. (~5~ Curbside Recycling Program February 20, 1991 Page 2 Residents will be mailed a letter signed by the Mayor introducing the pilot residential curbside program. The letter will let the residents know this is a voluntary pilot program and encourage their participation. Following the letter of introduction, residents selected for the pilot program will receive their recycling container with a "container stuffer." The "container stuffer" will explain what commodities are to be collected, which day their container will be picked uo and cenera~ mi; rtei;ne~ P..~ t...... --- -'._ ~rc~~aW. An essential part of the pilot program will also be tha educational element. It is recommended that a mascot be created in conjunction with the City's school districts to promote the educational aspects of the program. It is recommended a "mascot contest" be developed with tha school districts. This would entail a letter signed by the Mayor inviting school districts to participate in the contest. The contest would be conducted from March i, 1991 through March 22, 1991. Final recommendations and selection of the mascot would be determined by the Environmental Management Commission. The Environmental Management Commission will invite all participating school districts to join them at their March 28, 1991 meeting to announce the final selection of the mascot and to especially thank everyone for their participation. Following the selection of the mascot, the contract haulers would make arrangement for the mascot, along with the City's logo, to be "heat stamped" onto the recycling containers prior to the delivery of the containers. Also, the development of the mascot will include the creation of the mascot along with educational materials. It is recommended that these costs not exceed $25,000. These costs will not impact general funds. Costs The entire cost of the pilot program will be paid for by the contract haulers. These estimated costs of a pilot program of approximately 3,000 homes initially will cost the haulers more to do because of the initial small number (approximately 1,000 homes in each contract hauler's residential geographic sections) of residences selected and the number of containers made for the residences. After the evaluation of the pilot program, it is anticipated that costs can be reduced because larger orders can be placed with the respective vendors. /l 7 Curbside Recycling Pxogram ?ebruary 20, 1991 Page 3 Also, should the pilot program go City-wide after Sts ®valuation, the contract haulers have initially indicated that the City of Rancho Cucamonga can anticipate a cost of approximately $1.50 to $2.00 Por City-wide curbside recycling. These estimated coats do not include multi-family or commercial/industrial curbside recycling. Due to the nature of multi-family and commercialJindustrial collection, these C09ty will be negotiated with the rn++~r=ct haulers and staff accordingly anA W%'_1 ho Yreeanted tc the City Council fnhoai::y Lne evaluation oP the residential pilot program. The City of Rancho Cucamonga aid institute fees in July of 1989 associated with the state mandated requirements oP AB 939 which require local municipalities to begin programs such as curbside recycling to meet the specific mandates of reducing our so11d waste by 258 by the year 1995 and 50$ by the year 2000. eummarv The Environmental Management Commission is recommending a pilot residential curbside program be initiated with a special emphasis toward educating our residents of the importance of our solid waste management and our environment as a whole. It is anticipated the pilot program would be initiated May 1, 1991. A complete follow-up will be presented to the City Council following the Environmental Management Commission's three month evaluation of the pilot program. Included in the Environmental Management Commission's follow-up will be specific recommendations for improving, modifying and/or expanding the program. Re~ V-"'~+ fully submitted, Dian® O'Neal Management Analyst II DO/tlr D0:132 1 ~8" - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 22, 1991 T0: Chairman and Members of the Environmental Management Commission FROM: Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II S[TE.TECT: IEITI7IL EvALD>1TIOE Ol TEE PILOT COIIHBIDE L11IWM.TVI! nenmwv It is recommended that the pilot curbside recycling program ba extended to December 1991 and a second evaluation be conducted based on the additional data that is collected. ANALY8I8 The City's three contract haulers implemented an initial pilot residential curbside recycling program that began on May 15, 1991. The pilot program encompasses approximately 3,000 homes geographically distributed throughout the City. The contract haulers have provided summary reports for their individual geographic portions o! the City and, in general, the pilot program has resulted in 9a tons of commodity being recycled. Dua to the summer months and vacations by residents, the initial data received from the three-month pilot may ba skewed. In order to provide a more accurate evaluation o! the pilot program, it is recommended that the pilot ba extended for three months to assess additional data and provide coordination o! the alternatives for meeting the State mandated requiremanta of AE 939. The City Council will review the prapoeed policy for AB 939 and comments and/or proposed changes to the policy will need to ba finalized prior to assessing the pilot curbside program and making a recommendation to the City Council. It is also recommended that a second letter signed by the Mayor be sent to the residents on the pilot program thanking them for their voluntary participation and also to encourage those raeidenta eat currently participating to do so. It is suggested the second mailer include a tear-off portion to include survey questions that will assist staff in assessing the pilot curbside program, laitial Evaluatioa o! the Pilot Curbside 1~ugu~ta42~199Pr~~ Page 2 8tai! hes also prepared a second article for tke Grapevines Minter issue updating the residents on the pilot program. The contract haulers will also update residents on the pilot program through a mailer and/or billing cycle. ~ epspy~e~c~t'fu((l/Jl~y, /s//Jubmintted, Diane o~Neel '~J[_, Nanagement Hnalyst II DO/tlr D0:778 /~~ ~R ~~ •'S D35P0[RL 5[RV. INC. •R. IR.1)fl tf171 P. 2 ity of Rancho Cucamonga Curbt;ide ReCyclinQ Tonne~Qe Rdport n y Name; A R THGII ewepaper ® Mixed Prtpar leas ~ pgT plastic Gizt~ tuminum ® HDPS Plastic In ® , j PartlctpafJoll Rate: I IZbtai Number of Houaetitalds on Rottte; ;Number at Participants on Route; ~] ;Percentage of Participation: sex ~PERCENTA6E Of PARTICIPATION (RAMONA yl~~q) 65X Dlvtd~ namb~r et partlolpantl by fetal lfdaf~A0ldf ~6 ~~-/ P,2 City ox Rancho Cucamonga Curbeido RecyCllnQ '1'onnaQe Report Company Nams; W.ataa R.at. _~. -'-1 y~te; ~Y [hut Su=v Materlale: Nswapaper 3i.sbo Mlx~ed PaperC ~'~ Glaaa ==.R3s PfiT Plastic '-'..7 Aluminum 648 HDPti PlaatiC i9,o Tin Z4=, Parttclpatlon Rate; 'lbtai Nttmbsr o! Households on pouts: e,s Number of Partlclpanta on Routed a,o=s r.ta s.e Ouo, PercentaQs o! Paritcipatlon: 40.6: R..kly S.e Out Rau ' Dlvlds Aumb~r of pa:llcfpanl~ by Iota! bonloAold~ L ~l'~ r ~- ~' City of Rancho Cucamonga Curbside Recycling Tonnage Report Company Narne: ~ RA~c~aa >>IZ7•oaAt~ rr-.'....~.! . ' ~,. J Materials.• Newspaper ;30~`; Mixed Paper O Glass 7,SR I pET Plastic ~.3.:~ Aluminum ~y g HDPE Plastic ~,s~ Tin oa y,~ at`s 1bs Participation Rate: Total Number of Households on Route, ~~ 'a~ti Number of Participants on Route; H,csa ~ Percentage of Participation: s~°/u I Av.r~+.»~J~ D1v1de number o1 partlcipant~ by total hoaseholda ~ a.~ t.ta a yr nntva.nv ~. ui. ntnvtvvn STAFF REPORT '" DATE: September 4, 1991 TO: Mayor and Hembere of the CS[y Council Jack Lam, AICP, Clty Manager FAOM: Brad Buller, Clty Planner ay: Richard L. Alcorn, Code Enforcement SupervLar BUBJECTt CONSIDBMTION TO JOIN COUNTY'8 VBNICLS ABATBNENT PROGPJIN aN0 AECONMBNDATION OE N63T END MEM08R TO SEAVE O SERVICE AUTfiORITY REC0106NDATION: The Clty Council should cone idar the following information concerning the City's participation in the San Bernardino County Vehicle Abatement Program, and if desired, select a nwainea to serve on the Ban Bernardino County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service Authority. BACROAOUND: The County of Ban Bernardino has approached the City to solicit participation in t County operated Vehicle Abatement Program. The ptogrw, funded by •tippinq• Ease already collected by the County for refuse disposal, would requite no add itionsl monetary contributicn by the City for participation. upon review of the Lnitial proposal, Staf! questioned whether the City could dcvelcp its awn program and receive a portion of the County ^tipping• fees directly, Ln lieu of participation in the County Program. Following rsaearch to datecmine It funding could be diverted directly to the City, it wee established that the "tipping" foes designated for vehicle abatement could only be used to fund the County program. In addit icn, the passage of Assembly Bill 4114 now al lows the County, in cooperation with cities, to develop a Servies Authority that would be eligible to receive addit tonal funds from the Btat• of California for the operation of a Vehicle Abatement Program. Again, individual sit tea are not eligible for those additional funds. ANALYSIS: Through tipping feaa, the City i^ already paying for a portion of the County Vehicle Abatement Program, and will continue to pny regardless of direct participation. Vehicle abatement is an eztramely useful tool used by Code 6ntorcemsnt to resolve problems in the city. Participation in the County program should improve efflclency and decrease the amount of Staff time required to proeau vehicle 1~-~ City Council 9t af[ Report Sapbmber 4, 1991 pogo 2 abatement caeca. Staff viawa partlcipat Lon in the program as a way of improving an axiatinq enforoamsnt tool. Tha tetabliahmant of a Service Authority in cooperation with the County and other cities will provide a new avenue for funding. Vebicle Ab !u t p Undet contract, when an inoperative, wrecked, or abandoned vehicle is required to be removed from private property, the County would provitle n template narvice foe legal notification to the vehicle sad property owners and the phynieal removal and final dinooe Lt ion of the v.6~.,. r,«., .«s• ......,+ .. control of the enforcement ptoceen, including identification of violet ions sad the initial notification to the resident cz property owner, in order to seek voluntary compliance. The proposed County program would take over at the et art of the actual sbatsment protaen. Our Coda 6nforcemant staff would eonilnus to conduct the compliance inspnctiona, and, when needed, nupervina the removal of a vehicle by a County contractor. Ufa of the County program would immediately produce a aavinge of up to $100.00 per vehicle in towing fees. In addition, Lhasa would be s eubntsrttial aavinge in staff tisw required to protean legal notice and the disposition of vahicla• a6nted by the City. service Authority, Asnw6ly 8111 4114 •llowa counties to form narvtca author itiee fcr the abatement of abandoned vehicles, and to impose a $1 vehicle regietrat ion fee for all vahiclan within the county. The fees collected would be deposited in Cho Abandoned Vahicla Trust Fund, which this bill creates, and would be continuously appropriated for allocation by the State controller to fund local vehicle abatement progzama. The creation of a Service Authority will complement both the County and City vehicle abatement programs by providing add itionel funding for caoplaint lnvectigat ion and vehicle towing. Tha County Board of Suparvinore, and a majority of the cities withi.i the County moat approve reeoluiionn anta6linhinq the San Bernardino county Abandoned Vehicle Abatement (Service) Authority. Tha County Department of Environmental Health Secvican will be request ing the City Council to approve each a resolution in the near future. The Service Authority will be admin ieterad by n five member Board of Directors, with two members zapreaantinq the unincorpozaiad County arena, and three mambnrn rapreeaniinq the titian, (one each from the Hest valley, the Enet Valley, and the Nountein/Denect areanJ. /O City Connell etalf Report September 0, 3991 Page 3 At th/ir septambr 1991 m/etinq, tM Solis Nub Advisory Taak lorce (of which Councilman Alexander L/ a marcher) will b ulactinq three members and three alternate/ for xoeommendatian to the Boud of supervisor/ u reprauntatlvo [or GM incarposatsd cltie/. The Tuk Tores will be msklnq their selection from naminaa/ recommended by variou/ city council/. Nominee/ may M eleetsd official/ or City employ///. CONCIABIOmi staff reee®end/ participation Ln the County vehicle Abatement program. TM proposed County Contract /nd uwciated ordlneneee ~ ......a.w :.. .,,~a ._,« _.a .. .... ._ _.. __ _. ~y .ar uaa. If CM Clty Council concur/ with this approach, thle~contraetywill G brought before Lh/ City Council at the oetob/r 2, 1991 meeting. The development of a County VehlCle Abataeent 8amiee Authority L aLc progreaelnq quickly. I! the City Council wieho Lo patticipats, the City representatlw /hould M elected to wme on tM service Authority, and that name should then G [orwarded to the solid Waste Advisory Tuk dorce (sNATl). Minub action i^ all that is needed at this time. Me lly • tted Bra er City anner 88:ALA: na Attachment.: Letter of Auquat 23, 1491, ra: Sasambly Bill 4114 Bill Tert - AH d116 Draft County Resolution to 6etab1l/h service Authority [ ~K/ GOUN R01N0 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES \\\111Idil \ ~y ENVIRONMENTgl MANAGEMENT dROUP ~~ ~ 3 @ ^~ ]96 NeM A•,ow1,r18 Arwr • ewn e.xw,/w. CA e3/160i90 • 11111 3o~1a/9 'H \a PAMEUA 9ENNETT. N. E. N.4. 929E.a°o°a7en • am.do,n9nu • o1u»lae7o ~N/plltl~~~ ol.«:m, 16606 CMc e,Ir1 • VktorvW. CA 1]]93 • 1918 24}e111 11690 Ammr 9a•11rlrf faMML CA 933M • 1711182HIM wr~,n <, ,•• e~ ~'tl .~ 47b7 Twnnvnim PIYnr wpnwav Yuen vwp CA 823M • 11791 2A•6/10 +aw,• Nm,ax~ .ew•vwr v..xy 6N MIIWOYIO Carly V.na f:M1xl hoyM w.,ex I a,xm 3966 bn FNM Sow) 9n ann.renf, CA 82116.OMI • I71N 3e9~9200 W I.x ~w nraro ae.ma~n EnrvonnlnW Enldcnnnn xW NawNp cnmo n.a'wn' 173 WM TMra 6n1•t 4.n 8•rn•rNio, CA 93g6Q916 • 17111 987A61L8816 ca, : nmm rm, 5n lvn•ran c~xe 7x w• •• rxm. August 23, 1991 JapE LBm, filly Managef CNy d Ratclro Cucatnargs 10500 Civle Carats D7iw P. O. Box 907 Ratrdro Cucatnorlpa, CA 91729 9lEb)ed: AaaembN Bits 4114 M w.~• i vmxw ww ~ E o~ i r~ r9 ,.m.,.,.:~.~:• qiY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA AOMIWn° TIrN nnn •~n• ~F MVU 40 IJJI •~• The tolbwinp krlomnnon rspanWlp Assembly BY 411414 a VMicN ADelenNnt AWhorlty was preasMSd to 9ra Slid Waste Advie0ly Task Fora on Aupgt 15, 1991. TM dOmtrNtEe ktrJlEde the text d AB 4114, a letler Irom grs CaWOmla HIgIM•ay PWrd (CHP) provWMlp amwers to preetlorte, tM CMP At7arrdOned VeMde Abatement Program OuidelNree, a lbw dour, and a Request br Concumerrce weh the County remrtxrlefldat1011. TM Request br Corlmrrerrm govkbs an ovsMew d its hblory of AB 4114 and tlrs pteeess needed Tor knplemerRation. The DepanrtlsM d EnvirorNnaraal Hsatth Setvkss wig have an action Hem at the SWATF meeting in Sepember to appoint Kve merl'bers b a astvite aNhorNy. The Processes treaded to impbmmd this program Include: • A resokAion is adopted by the County Board d Suparvleors. • A resolutbn b arbped M a rtlapoly d tfle fides wits a ma)orYy d 1M irrmtporoted populalion. • Members and aMematas d firs Service AtdhorNy an approved by ttrs SWATF. • Setvite A:RMray prepares a plan d Irrplemersadort blowing DMV guidalinas. • Tne Implemenlatbn Plan is submitted b the CHF by ddaber 1, 1991. • CHP revbws plan aM rsmrlnrends revisions by Nowrrbsr 1, 1991. • Service Auttrodry submMs apptovetl plan to mntroNer by January 1, 1992. • Fees are mgedetl by StaN on ve1McM rsgbtratbn. Thb aWhonly and rekrlb7raemete W1E clot reDtaa the County Vehby ADtlemenl Program. exielirrg coMrads with klmrporated cafes, a proposed mrdraga. h wits mrtplsmeM both murrty and cAY ptograrro and provide addltionW h6ndirrp br eomplWnt imeatlga0on and vehkM towing. / ~~ cxy a nen~flo cuanwnpa Alquat 23, tapt Paps Two Foal Iree 1o eaN IM a PfryNN fkoeka, suPSrvuor o1 tlN VafNds ADtlemerN Pmpram, 81387-~12 Y you flaw afy queatiorq or need addlbllW Ylferrfletbn. j,2^, ° ~~~:~ PAMELLA BENNEI'f DINCCTr1R PBev a: PhylNe 610011e l~-~ nisphy loa4-1990 B:ll Texx ...FORMATION PAGE 1 BILL NUMBER: AB 4114 BILL TEXT CHAPTER 1684 APPROVED BY GOVERNOR SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 FILED YITtl SECRETARY OF STATE SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 PASSED THE SENATE AUGUST 27, 1990 PASSED 1HE ASSENRLY SUNS 7, 1990 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 26, 1990 INTRODUCED BY Assembly Members Clutr and Bentley (Principal coauthors: Senators Killea, Xcpp, and NcCOrquodale) (Coauthors: Assembly NemDara Norman Yaters, Campbell, Cannellm, Chtton, Cortese, Eaatin, Eaves, Epple, Parr, Barrie, tlaunr, Hurray, and Peace) (Coauthors: Senators Alquisx, Ayala, and Presley) MARCtl 2, 1990 An act to emend Section 22665 oF, snd [o repeal and add Sections 9250.7 and 22710 of, the Vehicle Coda, ra latiag to vehicles, snd making an appropriation thecefor. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 4114, Clute. Motor vehicles: abaadoamaat. E:istiag lasr imposed a $1 vehicle ngistntion fee for dayosip in tM Abandoned Vehiclm Trust Fund rhlch is cmtinuom ly appropriated For cosu of the Controller, Department of eha Califonia tlighvay patrol, and spec ifiad local abandoned vahicl• auiaaaca abatement programs. This bill would delete those provlsiona and would provide £or the establishame sad teninacion of as rvita authorities for the abatement of abandoned vehielrs sad fuadiog of local abaadoaad vehicle abatement progrus, u specified. The bill could authorin • sacvin authority, for a specified period, to inpou • fu of S1 on vehicles rsgiatand is the county rhich „~E Diapi3y !494-loon _--_ T:Xt - ..:FDnHATiON BILL NUM9ER: AB 4114+ BILL TEXT es cahlished the service authority. Those fees would 6e depos iced in the Abandoned Vehic la Trust Fund which Chia bill would create and would be r oncinuously appropriated for +llocat ion by the Controller co Eund local vehicle aba cement prog came after deduction of certain adminis erat ive costs. Appropriation: yes. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOVS: SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares that the problea of abandoned veh ie lea .. ~...,a..~, _.,e __ -- -,- ....e„icw ,,iuc local gmw cnmenes have tnsuf£SC Sent reaourcea to adequately address the problem. The Legislature fureher finds that the Sec reaae in abandoned vehic lea Ss not only n public nuisance, bus • danger to the public's haaleh and safety. Therefore, in order eo ensure ehe abatement of abandoned vehlclea, ehs Legislature finds ie nece aaary eo provide for ehe establishment of local aervica authorities far the purpose of stating abandoned vehlclea. SEC. 2. Section 9230.7 of eha Vehicle Code Ss repealed. SEC. 3. Section 9230.7 is added eo the Vehicle Code, to read: 9230.7. (aJ A service authority entaDlSehed under SactSOn 22710 may impose a service fee of ono dollar ($1) on vehic lea regieteced to an owner with nn addreaa is cha county which established the service authority. ?he fee shall be paSd to the dapartmene at the time of ragiatration, me renewal of ragl5tratton, or when renewal becomes delinquent, on oc afar January 1, 1992, except vehicles thst are erpreaaly erempced under this code from the payment of regiatcacion Fees. (b) The daparemrnt, after dadut ting its administrative coats, shall transmit, at least quarterly, the net amount collected pursuant to eubdivialon (a) to cha Treasurer for deposit in the Abandoned Vehicle Trust Pund which is hereby created. All moaay in the fund is comtinuourly appropriated to eha Controller for allocation to a servin authority which boa an approve6 abandoned vehicle abatement program pursuant to Section 22710, and for payment of the adainlatntive cosec of the Controller. After deduction of Sea admiaistn eive costa, the. Controller shall allocate the money in the Abandvned Vehicle Trust Pund to each sarvite authority do proportion to the revenwa received ftom the fan imposed by that authority purauaat to subdivision (a). (c) the fu impofed by n urvica authority atoll remain in affect only for a period of five yearn after the dace on which the authority is established. SEC. 4. SeeeSoa 22663 of the Vehlc la Coda is amnded to rods 22663. Notwithstanding Section 22710 or any other provision of law, eha department may, at the request of a local authority, other them a recvice authority, adminiatar on behslF of the authority its abandoned vehicle abatement and removal program ertabliehad purauapt to Section 22660, SEC. 3. Seceioh 22710 of chm Vehicle Coda is upeelad. SEC. 6. Section 22710 is added to the Vehicle Code, to rudl 22710. (p A aervica authority for the abatoant of abandoned vebSeLa may be euabllahed, and a oho dollar ($1) vehic lm regiat ration fee imposed, in any county it eha board of supervisors o£ cha county, by a two-ehirda voce, and a majority of the cttiu having • maj ozity of iha incorporated pcpulation within ~~ DiSp lay 19B 9-1990 8111 text - INividfASiuN BILL NUMBER: AB 4114 ' BILL TEXt ?ACE 3 the county have adopted resolutions providing for the establlshmenc of the auchoricy and imposition of the Eee. The membership of the authority shall bev determined by concurrence of the Doa rd of supe [visors and a majority vote of the majority of the ciciea within the county having a majority of the incorporated population, (b) The authority may contract and may uwde make any act convenient or necessary co carry out any law re lacing to the authority. The auchoricy shall he ataFfed by existing county and city personnel. (c) (1) Notvithstand ing any ocher provision of La v, a service authority may adopt an ordinance establishing procedures for the abatement, removal, and disposal as public nuisnncee, of abandoned, wrecked, dismantled, ar .. . .._. ..._ __,...._ __ _..~„_ __._._.._.._, r,_ uwpaaa uvc vcua.re. ... p.... .... ..,. .... r._..._ ,._ r_,,. __ r._r"'~ . - . the recovery, pursuant to Section 23865•oz 38773.5 of ehe Government Coda, or asaumpeion by the service authority, of costa of adminiae ration and that removal and disposal. The actual removal and disposal of vehicles shall be undo rtaken by an entity which may be a county or city or the department, pursuant to contract with the service authority as provided in this section. (2) The money received by an authority pursuant to Section 9250.7 end thSa section shall be used only for the abatement, removal, sad disposal as public ouisance+ of nny abandoned, wrecked, dismantled, or inoperailva vehic la• or parts thereof from privato or public property. (d) (1) An abandoned vehicle abaummt progran and plan of a serviu eu[hority shall he implemented only with the approval of the county and a majority of [he cities having a majority of the incorporated population. (2) The department shall provide guidelines Eor abandoned vehicle abatement programs. An authority's nbendonad vehicle abatement plan and program shall be consistent vich chose guidelines, and shall provide for, but not be limited to, an estimate mf ehe number of abandoned vehicles, • disposal and enforcement strategy inc lading contractual agreemeata, and appropriate fiscal con[ro la. (3) Tha approved plan shall be submitted to the department by August 1, 1991. The department shall review the plan sad make racommendaeSocz for revision, if any, of the plan 6y October 1, 1991. Site service authority shall aubmic the plan, ^^ revi+ed, to the department and, if determined by the department to ba consistent rich the guidelines, shall submit the plan to the Controller by the following ]anuary 1. Ezcept a+ provided in aubdlvi+ion (e ), the Control lrr shall make no al lovciom for a calendar yur to a urviu authority for which an approved plan vu not revived on or before Sanuary 1 of that year. (e) Any approved plan which vat adopted by the authority purauanc to subdivision (d) say be nvSud purauamt to the proudun pnacribad in aubdivS+Son (d), laelud ing compliane• with nay data docribed therein for submiaaion to the department and the Controller, respectively, in the year in which cM revia ions era propo+ad. Conpliaav vich that proudure shall only be required iF the revisions an substantial. A aerviu authority rhich is newly formed and bas nor cosplied vich subdivision (d) may so comply after the days specified in subdivision (d) by subdttirt{ an approved plan oa oz before those data in the yur in which the plan is submitted. (f) A urviu authority shall true to ezUt on the date that all reveaw• received by ehe authority pursuant to thin section and Section 9250.7 have /~ / Dasn my iio"9-i990 Bill Tazt 14POP: ST.I04 BILL t7UMBEA: AB 4116 BILL TEXT PAGE 4 bean szpended. SEC. 7. The Department o! the California Highway Paerol shall report to the Legislatuce by Sanuary I, 1996, on the eEiattivenue of tha abmdoned vehicle abatement programs conduriad puraumt Lo Beet ions 9250.7 and 22710 of the Vehicle Code. upon request of ehm Depacmamt of the California Highway Patcol, a service authority treaead pursuant to Section 22710 shall submit data relative to tha oparacion of its abandoned vehicle abatemanL program to tha department. RESOLUTION N0. D ~~~~ flESOLUtION OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO TO ESTABLISH AN ABANDONEC VEHICLE ABATEMENT SERVICE AUTHORITY WHEREAS, ridding our communities of the nuisance of abandoned vehicles is a significant problem faced by local government; WHEREAS, the Department of Envli onmental Ne alth Services finds that a countywide program for the abatement, removal, and disposal of abantlon ed, wrecked, dismantled, and inoperative vehicles is needed to protect the health and safety oC the citizens of the County of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, Section 22710 of the Califernia Vehicle Cade Drevides for the eataDliahmant of a Sarviee Authority for the abatement of Abandened Vehicles and the imposition of a ono dollar (f 1. 00) vehicle registration fee if the oounty and authorized cities adopt resolutiena Drovlding for the establishment of the Authority and the impoaltion of the fee, WHEREAS, Section 22710 of the California Vehicle code provid ea for the membership of the Servioe Authority Lo be determined Dy a ooneurrenee of the Board of suDerulsors and ^ maJority vote of the maJority of the cities within the County having a m a~ority of the incorporated population. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BEA NAfl DING 7HA T: (1) Tne San Bernardino County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service Authority be eatabliahed in San Bernardino County pursuant to Section 22710 oP the California Vehicle Cade; and (2) A one dollar (f 1.C0I vehicle registration fee De imposed in the County oC San Bernardino pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 22710; and (3) She memberehlD of the Board of DSrecto ra of the San Bernardino County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Authority shall consist of five (5) people currently employed by the County and/or CSti ea and shall be appointed as follows: Two County employees, one member representative of the Unincorporated Mountain/Desert area one member reDresentatlve of the Unincorporated Valley area. 7liree Incorporated city employees, one member representative of the Waat Valley Coalition, including the City of Ontario, one memb ar rapraaentative of the Eaat Valley Coalition and, one mom bar representative of the Mountain/Deaart Coalition. (N) The Board shall appoint the two members to the Service Authority no later than SeDtamDer 23, 1991. l33 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 4, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members oP the City Council Jack Lam, AXCP, City Manager FROM: Joe Schultz, CLP, Cammunity Services Director SUBJECT: PUBLIC TEL;PHONES IN PARES The Council has requested that the placement ~? ~wloyi,ones 1n the park be discussed. m*i~ i„Larmation will provide you the ha^!:;=cw,u and status o! the program for your discussion. BACKGROUND In previous years phanee ware provided, and the infrastructure necessary for the installation of a public telephone was included with the construction of a city park facility. Upon completion o! the park, General Telephone (GTEy would install a public telephone and establish service. However, in 19a7 GTE analyzed phone usage in the parka and found that the phones did not meet their minimum profit criteria. As a result of their analysis, GTE determined that only those park locations they had previously approved would have telephones issued and serviced by them. In 199D, with the construction oP old Town Park, GTE notified the City that they would no longeY install public telephones in park facilities free of charger the Gity was further notified that if the City wished to establish telephone service, then the City would have to pay for the installation and monthly service charges. GTE also informed the City that they would not reimburse any of the Punds collected by the telephone to the City. GTE cited heavy vandalism, low profit, and the role of the telephones in aidin4 drug trafficking as their reasons for no longer installing them. Presently, phone conduit has not been installed in the Windrows, Spruce Avenue, coyote Canyon, Church street, and East Beryl Parks. Included for your information is a statue sheet showing the public telephones in the various park facilities. Phones have been installed in Bear Gulch, Heritage, Red Hill, Victoria, West Greenway Parks and the Lions Community Center. Parke which have phone conduit but currently no phanee are West Beryl, Hermosa, Kenyon, old Town, and Vintage. CITY CCUHCiL NEETZNv PUBLIC TELEPHONES IN CITY PARKS September 4, 1991 Page 2 The recent requests trom sports groups for the provisions of public telephones, as well as the removal/vandalism of one of the public telephones in Heritage Park (April l0, 1991), have caused the telephone issue to resurface. Organized park user groups have expressed their belief that telephone service in the parks is a necessity for contacting paramadica, fire and sheriff personnel in the event of an emergency. In addition, the installation of telephones would provide a much needed and appreciated community service, like enabling children to contact their homes to arrange for rides/pickup. On Tuaeday, June 18, 1991, Commissioner Hruce Ann Hahn and staff mat with three representatives from 6TE to discuss public telephones in city parks. As a result of that meeting, OTE will continue to maintain the nine existing pay phones in the parks and community centers at no charge to the City. In addition, they have agreed to install and maintain, at no charge to the City, public telephones in all city parks provided the City installs the phone conduit in all parks. Staff again met with a representative from GTE on Wednesday, June 19, 1991, to review those park locations with conduit installed eo that they can be scheduled for new telephone service. As has been the Ci[y's prior practice, and to address the previously expressed concerns of GTE, new telephones will be installed in clearly visible locations to minimize the likelihood that they will be vandalized or used in conjuncticn with illicit activities. GTE has begun processing the work orders to install/reinstall telephones at those parks with existing telephone infrastructure. These installations will occur within the month. In order to increase the usage of the telephones and ensure their effectiveness in an emergency, GTE has requested that they be permitted to provide telephone directional signs in visible locations in all parks. Staff will work with GTE to determine the best locations for these signs and to ensure that they are not obtrusive. ANALYSIS City staff has met with a GTE Service Planner to plan the telephone infrastructure for the park sites that lack the necessary conduit. 3y R CITY COr_7NrrL 22ETI;:G PUBLIC TELEPHONES IN CITY PARES September 4, 1991 Page 3 The City would ba responsible for providing this inlrastruc- ture an$, once completed, GTE will follow up with the telephone placement. The placement will be done at no charge to the City. However, no funds have been budgeted Por additional infrastructures this fiscal year. Council has asked staff to examine options to address the infrastructure. Any decision to fund these improvements this year should be through reallocation oP budget Punde. At tha time r.. ..+i ..~__ ~,_ agenda, a comment was made-es~to whetheraor notpnsset seizure funds could be used to install the conduit for telephones in the parka. Staff has consulted the City Attorney and he advised staff that use of asset seizure funds for this type of improvement would not fall within the limits for use of asset seizure funds. The following options are available to fund the infrastructure costa: 1) Consider the installation costs in the Fiscal Year 1992/93 Budget process. 2) Reallocate a portion of the funds appropriated Por park tree replacement. Presently the City is a co-applicant with the California Department of Forestry and Fire for U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) giant for trees. The SBA is expected to award the grant funds this month. Should the City~s application be successful, then the grant monies could be used to offset funds already allocated by the City for tree replacement. The offset funds could then be reallocated for telephone infrastructure installation. 3) Council may wish to approve funds now prior to hearing from the grant application. If the application is not approved by the SBA, then the City could reduce the number oP trees scheduled for replanting. Re ctfu ly submitted, Ax e Schultz, LP ommunity Se is s Director JS/SMD/kle Attachment ~ ~~ PARK TELEPHONE STATUS June 1991 mark Facil{tY phone 6t ~+ Coe 1. Bear Gulch Park Yea Phone currently in operation 2. Beryl Park - East No Phone removed with recent imarovamPThe ni~.• verify conduit location and notify GTE when ready for phone installation. 3. Beryl Park - West No Conduit in place for future phone installation. GTE to install within the month. 4. Church Street Park No Requires conduit installa- tion prior to phone place- ment. City to notify GTE when ready for phone installation. 5. Coyote Canyon Park No Requires conduit in~talla- tion prior to phone place- ment. City t0 notify GTE when ready. 6. Heritage Park Yes• Two phones installed with initial construction. - Equestrian Unit phone currently in operation. - +~Hallfield phone stolen 4-10-91. GTE to reinstall phone ae soon as possible. 7. Hermosa Park No Conduit in place for future phone installation. GTE to install within the month. 8. Kenyon Park No Conduit in place Por future phone installation. GTE to install within the month. 9. Lions Park No Phone located at adjacent Lions community center. 13 ~l C,. Park Phone Status June 1991 Paqe 2 10. Milliken Park ii. uia •1•oWn Park 12. Red Hill Park 13. Spruce Avenue Park 14. victoria Groves 15. Vintage Park 16. West Graenway Park 17. Windrows Park No No Yee No Yes No YeB No Currently under construc- tion - requires conduit installation prior to phone placement. Lewis Homes to provide infrastructure. City to notify GTE when ready. conduit in place for future phone installation. GTE to install within the month. Three phones installed with initial construction. All phones currently in operation. Requires conduit installa- tion prior to phone place- ment. City to notify GTE when ready. Phone installed with initial park construction. Conduit in place for future phone installation. GTE to install within the month. Phone installed with initial park construction. Requires conduit installa- tion prior to phone place- ment. City to notify GTE wren ready. Phone currently in operation. Phone currently iri operation. 18. Lions Community Center Ys~s 19. Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center 3tME/dak 13 `~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SfiAFF It~i'OST DATE: September 4, 1991 TO: Mayor and Members of the Clty Council Jack Ism, AICP, City Manager FROM: Jerry B. Fulcuood, Deputy Clty Manager SUBJECT: pROTO6Rp 1?HABE II POR R680LUTiON OF DAY LAHOREA IBBUES The CouncH Subcommittee and the Day laborer Task Force recommends 1 following: 1) Clty Coundl adopt the Day Laborer Task Force Proposed Mission a Goals Statements; 2) direct staff and the Day Laborer Task Forx to develop program for setting up a Job site for day laborers, including identSfying the fla impact of any proposed Job site on the City's flnanctal ability to fund such program; 3) the City continue to work with the Task Force on a regional basis address the day laborer problems by contlnutng to sollctt Input and cooperate among neighboring cities. >~~ound On October 17, 1990, City Council directed Che Public Safety Commission explore ways to resolve the concerns of the community impacted by the d laborers. The problem caused by the day laborers >n the area of the former lab camp has become an issue with which Rancho Cucamonga is dealing with on dally bases. The problems are not confined to the immediate azea of the form labor camp. These problems extend from Arrow Route north to Base Line ar from Grove east to Archibald. The Public Safety Commission and the Day laborer Task Force have been give more latitude than in the past to develop a plan fo address this ongoing probler The plan will be an overlay of the many actions that took place in the past by tl Ctty Council as well as the Public Safety Commission. Some of the actions that were taken >n the past aze as follows /~~ PROP08ED PHASE D FO8 RE80LUTlON OF DAY IAHORE-t ISSUES September 4, 1991 Page 2 1) Regular fire inspections at El Chico Market and surrounding apartments for safety reasons; 2) Fires >n the area have been kept to a minimum since weeds have been abated, and acuvlUes have dropped since the day labor camp was torn down: zi '!'!~^ Pc'.:ce :r ::c Yrc.;:.~d auu:u~i~i pairois of the area In the eazly morning hours: 4) Poattng and enforcing "no stopping" zones along Arrow Route and other azeas where safety hazards exist; 5) Clearing buildings and other debris on the former day laborer camp property: 6) Ensure that property owner of the former day laborer camp 1s !n compliance with weed abatement and other types of hazards abatement; 7) Fonvazdtng letters to the Butlding Industry Association, asking for cooperation In Improving the situatlon by notlfyirtg their representatives not to pick up workers in the general area: 8) The Clty has been communicating with the Employment Development Department (EDD) and has been working with them on employment pro~ams for the day laborers: 9) Development of a no trespassing erdtnance and no trespassing sign posring plan; 10) Citing drivers for impeding traffic and pedestrians for Jay-walking; 11) Citation of vehicle drivers for Illegal parking, unsafe picking up and dropping off passengers and other Vehicle Code violations as observed; 12) The City has posted at the former labor camp area flyers in English and Spanish, informing those looking for work where they can go for help. The implementation of the above actions did have a positive impact on the day laborer situation; however, it appears that more 1s needed. / ~/ FROP08ED P8A8E II FOR R680LUTION OF DAY LAHORI~ IBt~IlEB September 4, 1891 Page 3 Some people perceive the mere presence of the day laborers as a problem, partictilazly when there are large groups. Others have cited very specific incidents such as day laborers running up to vehicles in an unsafe manner, blocking entrances to driveways, parking lots and stores, intimidating customers and passers-by, littering, loitering and urinating !n public. n uwuuer of residenis nave expressed concerns about other problems that the community has experienced. They are ae follows: usage of foul language, excessive trash, children being harassed, drunkenness, setting fires, loud music at all hours, break-ins, private properly trespassing, some residents being followed home, park usage after hours and high vandalism. While the City wants to reduce community tension by working with all residents towazds the implementation of fair, humane solutions [or all parties involved, (workers, residents, business community, general public and all other concerned parties), there appears to be no simple solution to this challenge, because these problems deal with social and JtuYSdictional Issues such as Immigratlon and its enforcement poltdes beyond the scope of this Ctty or any other dty. For example, the INS has limited resources, and is being spread very thin; therefore, it is not able to provide the Clty with the level of service Rancho Cucamonga needs. Secondly, the Police Department can only enforce laws where there is a violation. The mere presence of workers or anyone else standing around on public property does not constitute a breaking of the law, Additionally, everyone has a need for work, food, clotning and shelter -- social issues. Therefore, ttte Public Safety Commission, the Day Laborer Task Force and the Councll Subcommittee believe that a balanced approach to addressing this problem is necessary. On February 11, 1991 at 7 p.m., the first Day Laborer Task Force meeting was held. The Task Force included representatives from the community, schools, City staff, Public Safety Commission, City Councll and outer concerned groups. The Task Force focused not Just on enforcement, but it explored all vehicles, including a humanitarian approach >n resolving this problem. Attached to a copy of the Mission and Goals statement as bemg recommended by Chia Task Force, which, in the future would be modified to lndude other cities as they Join In the process. This Mtsslon Statement reflects a balanced humanitarian approach with the enforcement approach. 13~ PROPOSED PHASE II FOR RESOLUTION OF DAY LABORER B18UE8 September 4, 1991 Page 4 The Task Force has explored addressing the day laborer Issue on a regional approach, and the Citles of Upland and Ontario have expressed an Interest to provide Input to the Task Force. Additlonaily, the Task Force has set up a neighborhood hotline for non-emergency, non-public safety related issues. This hotline enables the City to monitor aaiiy Happenings within me area ano to aired tatty resources to sestet where and when possible. The Task Force has discussed the possibility of setting up a job center to help fn resolving the day laborer problem. A job center would entafi a convenient clearing house for employers who seek qualified, skilled or unsk111ed, temporary or permanent help to assist them iri trades, businesses and other employment areas. It could reduce the dangers and negative visibility of street hiring because It relocates the worker actlv(tlea to an accepted central area. The job center also serves as an Important resource, referral, and information center for a cadre of other support services. A )ob center also services the homeless, low tncome, unemployed, underemployed, semi-skilled and non-English speaking segment of the population that traditionally has greater needs. The Job center Is the first step m community efforts to deal with the Issue of Jobless workers >n a manner that serves the interests of all concerned. The job center helps ill Jobless workers -- especially immigrant workers and tomeless persons -- overcome the banters to full participation in today's society. The Jobs center program may help rn Improving the quality of Iffe for all residents by dimintshing the number of laborers gathering on street corners. Oilier cities that have had a measure of success with Job centers aze the Cities of Brea, Orange, Encinitas, and Los Angeles; however, there aze costs to establishing such a program. If the City Council decides to pursue this avenue, Councl can direct staff to develop siting proposals and identify funding options with the other cities. Since all ctfles aze closely monitoring their respective fiscal conditions, any new program funding must be cazefully analyzed. The Councll Subcommittee will work with staff to develop and bring back to the Councl this analysis and present its findings and recommendations at a later date. lag PROF08ED PHAB6 II FOR RE80LVPION OF DAY LABORER Bi8UE8 September 4, 1991 Page 5 The nr Task Force has spent a great deal of time and effort >n attempting to address this ongoing problem. Currently, the Task Force has been unable to find any one plan that will resolve this ongoing problem; however, by implementing a number of steps within a program, the problem may be further mitigated. xeapecuuuy suomuu;a, d'.~-- Jerry S. Fulwood Deputy CSty Manager JBF/pr 91-192 i `~ / DAY LABORER TASK FORCE FINAL MISSION STATEMENT We, the members of the Day Laborer Task Force of the City of Rancbo Cucamonga, ero dedicated to ensuring a safe community for the day laborers and the residents impacted by the day laborers. The task force will approach this issue from a humanitarian perspective. We shall explore the feasibility of implementing tho following goals after presenting our recommendation to the Public Safety Commission and the City Council. l~v DAY LABORER TASK FORCE Mission Statement (Please note) As a result of the recent participation from other cities, the task force may want to consider at a later date to amend our current Mission Statement to reflect the regional approach and the inclusion of other cities to the task force. Proposed Mission Statements may read: We, the members and cities of the Day Laborer Task Force, are dedicated to ensuring a safe community for the day laborers and the residents impacted by the day laborers. The task force will approach this issue from a regional approach and humanitarian perspective. We shall explore the feasibility of implementing the following goals after presenting our recommendation to the City Council. -OR- We, the members of the Day Laborer Task Force of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, City of .and City of are dedicated to ensuring a safe community for the day laborers and the residents impacted by the day laborers. The task force will approach this issue from a regional opproach and humanitarian perspective. We shall explore the feasibility of implementing the following goals after presenting our recommendation to the Ciry, Council. /~/ DAY LABORER TASK FORCE FINAL GOALS STATEMENT The following proposed goals have been established for coaxideration by' members of the Day Laborer Task Force: 1. Develop options to provide employment opportunities for day iaborers. 2. Direct day laborers to agencies providing self-help programs for personal imnr~vemnnt 3. Identify and develop job pick-up sites and/or employment centers which would provide a centralized location for day laborera to seek employment. 4. Develop educational programs and materials for day laborers. 5. Discourage illegal pick up of day laborers. 6. Promote understanding between law enforcement persomel and day laborers and use law enforcement only when necessary. 7. Develop and monitor a program to ensure safety of children going to and from school and waiting for the school bus in the morning. 8. Establish a regional approach in addressing day laborer problems. 9. Provide a day laborer hot line for non-emergency issues. 10. Maintain a representative for the day laborers as a liaison to be part of the ongoing task force committee. 11. Ensure employers in the local area ate awaze of day labor pick-up azeas through advertising and other public service communication systems. (This should be bilingual.) /Y cair^rows ne+Y. 334 .F conduit/trenching scarce t :,1dg. ? $10/LF = 53,040. ;0 _' conduit trench irg bldg, toVthone 3 Sl0/LF = 400. 2 core drills at bldg. 3 5200/core - 400. Total - 54,140. Scruce Avenue ?ark 280 LF conduit/trenching source to h1An a ~~~~~_- - 2,,;;, 0, yu ~r conauit/trenching bldg. to phone ? S10/LF 900. 2 core drills at bldg. 0 $200/core = 400. Total SG,100. coyote canyon Part 90 LF conduit/trenching source to bldg. '- S10/LF = S 900. 2 LF conduit/trenchinc bldg. to phone "a 10/LF = 20. 2 core drills at bldg. 5200/Core = 400. Total $',320. C*••-^~^ street pa ry ~,. ~F conduit/trenching 'rom pole on scuth side of Church Street a north sine of Church street ~ S20/LF = $1,400. 230 LF conduit/trenching _ron northside cf Church Street ro b'_dc. 0 $10/L = 2,300. 60 LF conduit/trenching bids. to phone (~ $10/LF = 600. 2 core drills at bldg. !? 5200/core = 400. Total 54,700. ;as- 3erv1 Park 50 LF conduit/treacY.ing scarce to bldc. 0 $10/LF = $ 500. 100 LF conduit/trenc.*.inc :ldc. to phene (~ S10/LF = 1,000. 2 care drills at bldg. n 5200/core = 400. Total $1,900. Total c= as ?arks $16,160.00 plus 10% contingency 1,615.00 GraIld Tota: 517,776". 00 I(ME:dak CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: September 4, 1991 T0: MAyor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Engineer SUBJECT: September 4, 1991 City Council Agenda - Revision to Item D-9 - Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance uistrict xo. t ana street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. I and 2 for CUP 88-28, located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Malachite Avenue, submitted by Forrest Perry Please correct Item D-9 as noted above to read: Approval t0 execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for CUP 88-28, located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Malachite Avenue, submitted by Forrest Perry. The attached Resolution No. 91-253 should also reflect the change to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3. Respectfully submitted, ~ n e (~ 4.~ Wm. J. O'Neil City Engineer NJO:dIw ~:; >~ , ~. . ~,:: :,~;; RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. ~ 3 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 ANO 2 FOR CUP 88-28 Cal ifornlaWHhas previouslyi f rmed acispec al tmainte an nce district pursuantgto the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Linnrtn~ ~_ '~~a.;~~ ~;,Lrici rio. 2 inereinatter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and proceedingsHto~nexathetproperty described on Exhibit "A" attachedshereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consen! to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this iegislative body hereby orders the annexation of the proper as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including ~Tevy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. I HIBIT 'A• ASSESS9WEPJT DIAG6RAP~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 eov inu.vai _~r. 'Qiiginal~PDOr Quality -~-4~ - - •;o~:~ ~~'r;, ,.`,. , eo~<<,>~o ~~ .. ~ -~ '~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ai ~. ^ ~I- i ~ ~~ -:__ ;' ~,w_~~ ~~~ . - ; ,. j ~ t ~~ li i ~ . - - a~~1`~ ~ ~~ Ga~]r9n?711 --- ~t ~s,. EXHIBIT 'B' ¢;. PROJECT NAME: CUP 88-28 N0. OF O.U. OR ACREAGE: 0.52 ac N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 1.04 units STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of Lam s to be Annexed District No. _~_ I --- --- -'- --_ --_ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Community Turf Ground Cover Trees District No. Street Name Equest.Trail Sg• ft. Sg. ft. Ea. 3 Maiachite --- --- --- 3 JS/9/4/91 September 4, 1991 Mr. Steven L. Keel Route 30 Comments CALTRANS DISTRICT NO. 9 ' P.O. Hox 231 San Bernardino, CA. 92402 SUBSECT: ROUTE 30 ENVI AONMBNTAL IMPACT REPORT/STATEMENT - COMMENTS FROM THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DeAr Mr. Vent. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is exceedingly pleased to have received the draft Environmental Impact Report/Statement concerning the Route 30 Freeway Extension project. Ae you are aware this project hag been planned for some time and is a long needed and awaited improvement to the regional circulation system as well ae a benefit to the City's own local system. The City of Rancho Ncamonga has long supported, and continues to support, the Route 30 Freeway Corridor project. BeWUes of eoncerm regardieg aosYSnity aesthetics sad rind eonditiom, as cell as a request to hs treated rich the same cossistmcy rith other cas~nitiee, the City of Reecho LLCa~Dnga fully anpports a recessed freeray rherever possible. Please consider the attached detailed comments and concerns as providing a constructive dialogue to improve and strengthen the draft Environmental Impact Report/Sintemen t. If you need any further clarifications or have questions concerning our comments, please contact City Planner Brad Buller or Principnl Planner Larry Henderson at (714) 989-1861. Sincerely, Dennis L. Stout Mayor Attachments GLS:js 91 8[HIBIT "A^ utlTAd:L® LIST OP OOIHHfNPS AND CUNCBHI78 3.9.2 - NOISB SBT?ING A. General As noted in the EIR/EIS Administrative Draft, Technical Report G was not includedl therefore, no information was available on location, design, or height of proposed sound walls. Thereforer the C1 Ly of Rancho Cucamonga would like to formally request a copy of Technical Report f„ in particular, those sections pertinent io the City of Rancho Cucamonga. She City reserves the ___ ..c .~. ,.~~<,. cummenv once that Technical Report has been submitted`to the City. 3.10 - LANO OSB - MACHO (a1CAMONGII A. Geaerel On page 3-37 a dfscaaeion should be added regarding the nee Junior High School comtrueted adjacent to the freeway in the vlclaity of tM northeast eoraer of Hezaosa and Highland Ayenaes. m sualpele relating to the potential visual sad ooiee iapncte should he aada and ~itigatioos should be deterad.ned. The paragraph on Rancho Cucamonga on Page 3-62 should be corrected to read: "Poncho Cucamonga ha8 completed updating its General Plan as of the Spri rg on !990. The proposed Route 30 corridor continues to be shown !n the latest ri rculation element to support plan land uses and to improve access to existing freeway systems." 1.1.1 - EPPBCfS A. General Co~ente It should 6e noted that although the proposed corridor has been in the planning stages for more than 30 years and potentially affected property owners along the corridor have long been aware of the poasibi lliy for project construction, the visual impact of that construction is certainly not common knowledge to the population that will be affected by said project. In addition it should 6e noted that the City o£ Rancho Cucamonga (as indicated in previous section9 of the EIR/EIS) has undergone a dramatic increase in residential construction and the accompanying new population. This trend is also indicated to be an on-going dynamic situation and therefore, it should be Eul ly noted in the EIR/EIS that a significant number of new members of the population may be totally unaware of the freeway project development. The correct reference in the first sentence of the third paragraph on Page 4-1 should be ei gore 2-1 and not eiqure 2-2. ~9 ~ 4. s.2. - MEa90AEo T~ IQRRfI'd8 RAAii A. Seperal Considerable discussion is given to consideration of the vi aual impacts of the Route 30 freeway construction ae contained Sn Pages d-1 through 4-7 of ~ the EIR/ES S. In texms of impacts to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, those impacts can be delineated into two categories. The first category is the aesthetic view and image portrayed to those traveling on the freeway Chrough the City of Rancho Cucamonga The second category relates to residents who view those sections of the freeway which are above grade, primarily residents within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that era 1i vl nq near the freeway or traveling on local and arterial streets. It is therefore somewhat di econcerting to see that the mitigation measures contained on Page 4-R appear to place all significant mi tigaiion measures ulw,n roe ioca• agencies involved. The City of Rancho Cucamonga would like to see two mitigation measures added to Section 4.1.2. These cmdltions are ae Eollowa: 1. Coltrane will be responsible for developing within each local jurisdiction a Master plan of Landscaping and in some cases, irrigation for ultimate implementation by both Caltrana and the local jurisdiction. 2. At a minimum, the general landscape theme should utilize large rocks, boulders, and si gn ificent massing of trees end shrubs similar Lo that found on a mountainside and previously implemented by Caltrana at the 210 and 605 Freeway interchanges in the County of Los Ange lee. This mitigation will 9o a long way in mitigating the loss of view of Ran eho Cucamonga Peak and adjacent hillsides. In addition, this mitigation measure would dovetail with mi tigetiona already called out in the EZA/EI$ for replacement and retention of biological resources identified in the right-of-way !n the City of Rancho Cucamonga (see Figures 4-6 through 4-11 of the EIR/EIS). Add the following line to the first sentence of the mitigation measure on Page 4-3R, second paragraph from the bottom: "By a qualified arborist who shall document the species and siae (i.e., diameter at breast, high crown width, and height).^ eillhoatde a section eMuld be added to discuss Cal rang' policies regardipg billboard advertising rithin end edjaeept to the freeway ri9htrof- way. The City rlehee to go on record oppneing billboards almq the Route 30 preerap. Design aesthetics/lmgipeered Structur e There is no aclmwledgaept of the treaepdme vassal Lpncte that engineered etrvetures such ae bridges, retaining rolls, and tunnels can hove m a ccaac:o!ty. The city reeonaenda a ad.tl9atim be added to require rnmultatim r9th local agencies m the fiml designs. I ^^ I~ s.a - 8rDa0i.OGy pl.owPLilIDB, ADD i~iTSR Dau.zTY A. 4d.1 - ffiEects - Oraimgs 7'he diacueeioa on page h13 indimtes that, Sn order to handle draimge for a depressed freeway at locations of major draimge conrsea, m inverted aiph® would be needed at additional significant cast. Horever, there is m discussion of the use of ride fist bridge etructurea to carry the draimge flare for a depressed treeray emfigaratim. Such an amlpsia ronld be beneficial for all the affected cities. In addition, Rable h1 identifie6 a nusber of attics drain projects to adtigate the elevated freeray design. i! Sa mclear whether these eltigatiom are necessary to divert draimgs flocs generated by properties mrtb o[ the frearay or free the freersy itself. Please clarify. {.17. - PaRI[S duD IOSC8S11YI011 A. {.H.1 ffifeets -Trails Please correct Table 6-/2r Trail Cros9inga. by adding the proposed 6aet Avenue Bike Trail with a corresponding grade aeperatlon at the Sast Avenue overcroesing. A copy of the City's Hxhibit labeled Figure 1, General Bikeways Plan. is attached far reference. B. 4.11.2 lleaeures W NSniiize Hart The City of Rancho Cucamonga requests that a mitlgatlon measure be added to this section addressing the need to design the project Go accommodate all tra119 listed in Table 4-12. 4.18 - DISD B112AImS - ADD® SDLTION The eastern quarter of Banclw Cn^~~•`^ga, and nearly ell of Fontam, Ss arbject to seaeoml high rude. Rhese rind condition Gave lead to city Hnilding Code Areadrenta requiring the design of strnetures m rithstand rinds in eacess of 80 nilee per hoar. In addition, these rind phmosmem nave canned at least one fatality and eavnral severe injariea to truck drivers at the interd~ange of the I-15 and I-10 freersps. 7fieee rind rnmdition also affect antc~oblle saneuveraD111ty and decrease vielbilitp for all frearap seers daring these periods. a full diacloeare and amlpeis of there aeenonal conditions is recreated. Such an amlysle aboard inlude m evalmtim of elevated and depressed freeray condition. At a sdnis~, a dtigntios aboard ba req¢ired for the imtallation of illusimted flashing rind yarning signs for eapty trucks and recreatioml vehicles w the I-/5 and aoate 30 Preeraya. 100 - hR Summary Providing an important east-west thoroughfare, Route 30 will eventually extend eastward in the City of Rancho Cucamonga along the historic corridor of Highland Avenue. This extension has been a part bf local and staEe planning since its adoption in 1949, its suspension in the late 1970x, and its rejuvenation in the mid-193 Os. Although much of the material culture of the cit rue industry which prospered along the foothills has been destroyed or significantly alt eced, significant elements remain and some stand to be impacted by the freeway's extension. In general, the mitigation maaauru should ba more completely detailed sad more thoroughly analy:ed by Caltraaa. Review of such resources to date Ras utilized National Regi at er Guidelines, per Section 106 and NEPA (National Environmental Policy ActJ, to determine five historic resources in Rancho Cucamonga eligible for the Register. While the proposed mitigations for these identified sites begin to address the range and severity of potential impacts, there are no provisions made ''-or the monitoring and [sporting as specified in AB 3130. Also lacking axe mltigatioa Smplemeatation timeliau sad •cheduUa fox the proposed measures. A number of resources in the Alta Loma and Etiwanda communities which lie along Highland Avenue and various intersections have not been included in the review process thus far. Per CEQA's (California Environmental Quality AcU Appendix G, Item J, a project impacting historic or cultural resources important to a conmunity or group should analyze and when necessary provide mitigations for such resources. Furthermore, there exists no denotation of the location of the eight archaeological sites reviewed for the project, see Section 3.7.1., and thus it is di Eficult to assess these potential resources per CEQA. Gana ral Commeat• Five Rancho Cucamonga properties we ce identified as eligible for the Hat Tonal Register: the Sam and xlf retla Maloof rouse and workshop; the Herbert and Evelyn Goerl itz Nouse; the Isle Nouse; the Ernst Mueller House; and the eucalyptus trees of the Etiwanda windbreak Rural Historic Landscape. SCrt~e ma joc issues. surrounding the ultimate character cf the freeway--such as interchange spacing and full freeway or freeway/expressway--have yet to be fine ilzed. Since the EIR/EIS has been drafted assuming a full freeway c onf iqu ration vith one-mile interchange spacing through the City, aubaequent decisions altering these assumptions would require f~.irt her investigation to determine potential impacts. The City of Rancho Cucamonga supports the full Freeway Alternative with complete interchanges at 1 mile Tote rvals as shown in the City's General elan. The Alternate Interchange Alternative would remove the Carnelian Street and East Avenue interchanges and therefore is inconsistent with [he City's Plan. Although the impact on two eligible rewurces, the landma rked Palms and Eucalyptus trees and the Mueller Xouae, would be reduced, it is unclear what effects the lack of an interchange would have on nearby at rests, in particular on Etiwanda Avenue, and therefore possibly other cultural resources. / ~I I I For all but the Mueller House, the freeway as it. is currently proposed auuld have resolute effects on these five identified p[operties and [hue require specific mitigation ax!asurea. iha "Draft Finding of Effecca" found that the freeway's cons[xuction would have an "adverse ei£ect" ar. all of the arias and proposed a variety of mitigation measures. The draft EIR/EIE explores a variety of altarnativea, including often the most extreme, '•No Project" and "COniplete Freeway Realignment." Fucther analysis which follows suggests further mitigation measures. Nature sad a.d•quacy o! proposed mitigations property: The Ram and Alfred+ re.loo~ Inwact: The Maloof property lice directly in the proposed yGt`. o "^" extension under both the Full Freeway and Freeway/Expcessxay alternacivwo, ...., , approximately 3.E of the to<al 5.1 acre site Proposetl Mitigations: The EIRlE2E suggesta possible mitigation measures including the relocation of the structures, a minor al ignmert change and const suction of a seta Lninq wall: and HA85-qunl iCy documentation prior to relocation ar demolition of the structuzea. Recommendations: The Wloof property i• one of unique sad auth•tioally superior qualities, ~• a rhole, the ^tructures in their eettiaq exist a• • x•source unsurpassed Sn iptegrity. Repcesentativas from the City, Cel tr ens, EANBAG, Fede xal Highway Commission, the Maloof family, and others met ducinq the first three months of 1991 to discuss a full zange of mitigation options to minimize the freeway's impact on this very significant and Complete cultural and aesthetic resource. Moat of the alto [natives discussed ducinq these meetings are not presented in the draft environmental documentation, including the coalbinatlon preferred by the MalooE's of alignment adjustment, purchaN of the site rich the option of life tenancy for the maloof's os relocation of the Family, phasing the freway improvements to provide ' the maximum amount of time for continued residency, and [he establishment of a museum/cultural center. These kinds of mitigations should be completely addressed prior to finalization of such documentation and a thorough mitigation monitoring and reporting program developed fox the decided mitigdtiom. piaplsty: Th H z__q~be t and~v lyn Qoezl itz Houan ID 9-l al Impact: Most iE not all of the site's setting and context would be destroyed Dy the pzoposed freeway--3.2 of 4.4 acres. A aucalyptua-lined drive, providing ancess and a strong historic sense of entry, along with an aged oak, and most of the original citrus IoZf~ groves would be removetl. Proximity to the southern :ig.•.t-Of-wsy xeuld cause ^••^a greater ttecusted V front Of the home and noise levels and place the business within 90 feet of the pavement. Proposed Nt ttgati ons: A proposed realignment affecting both the Maloof and the Goerlitz house would reduce the distanc between [he front (no cth) side of the house and the pavement would be increased to 110 feet. A 16-foot sound wall and/oz landscape buffer are also proposed as well as NABS-quality documentation if significant alteration or demolitior. occur. Recommendations: Every effort should be made to preaerve~ maintain, and protect daring comtructi on the mature oak and as mu0h of tae existing grove as poaaible. Since the Full Freeway alternative would eliminate the ,:roe. ~...o^r rwas and inhibit its currant usw. a detailed plan for new access which includes appropriate landscaping mirroring [he hi at oric design should ba developed. A complete mitigation monitoring and reporting program should also be developed for the property prior to finalization of the EIR/EIS. P roPerty: .Tama. x.+w wo .ee p_ o-~ Impact: Situated on an 10.9-acre site, the home li ea directly in the proposed freeway path, and the dzafC EIR/EIS Calls out fox its removal or demolition. Proposed Mitigations: A vaguely worded statement regarding the relocation of the home along with HABS -quality doeumentation is proposed. Recommendations: The efforts of a poaaible realignment did not receive the detailed treatment those for the Maloof residence did (maps, calculations of displaced individuals, cost, loss of structures}. No me:rti0u of the existing setting--the ant zance palms ~ the windrows--occurs in tae document, These contributing resources should be relocated as wall. Furthermore the writers of the environmental document state that ^relocation of the house may result in tae removal of one oz more mature Eucalyptus trees from the perimeter of site~^ without explaining this statement. The some and the palm"s relocation should be sponsored by the leatl agencies and be carefully and thoroughly atlvertised with prefer¢nce gluon to property owners in the Etiwanda community. A detailed mitigation monitoxi ng and reporting program should also be completed prior to a final determination of mitigations. Property: Thw Muwller Rnusa `y. <-57 Impact: The proposed East Avenue eaathound off-ramp as wall as the southern pavement edge will impact the home. ~~~ R Proposed NS ti ga ti ons: The craftsman home is not included in (he mandated 9f Aac law and as mitigations were proposed, although a standard 16' soundvall would be constructed. Recommendations: In the "Draft Finding of Effects " meas , uzes suggested to reduce the freeway's impact on thQ Mueller Rouse included the relocation of the East Avenue interchange and the construction of a noise barrier along the northern pxopezty boundary. N oweve r, the tlra Et EIA/EIS omitted 'the site from review undez Section 9(f), asserting that although the historic charactez of the property could be dimi nishetl by indirect noise and visual impacts, these effects would not substantially impair the site's Ristocic character, After a careful review, the city proposes no further mitigations. property: Th¢ Etiw da Ni d1+ k R 1 Hi i Impact: The freeray as it is proposed would zemove 35 acres, about 6,340 linear feet of eucalyptus vintlrova. Proposed Hi tigati ons: No specific mitigations are proposed in the document, rather relocation and replacement of taken xindzow acs said to be ^undez consideration." Recommends ti ons: Nith respect to the Nindbzeaks, the City's Etiwanda ape ci Ein plan calls out for eucalyptus windrows to be replaced at a 1:1 ratio and thus the 5:1 ratio is unacceptable by our City's standards. Moreover, as designated Landma zka, the Palm trees along Highland Avenue should also be subject to mi[igat ions rhich would reduce the proposed freeway's impact. It seems plausible to mitigate the retention and relocation of as many palms in the right of way as possible. Any and all mitigations should be carefully detailed and the lead agencies should provide for the environmental review process as detailed under CEpA, a full mitigation monitoring and reporting plan. ANALYSIS O- DNIDtNTI-ZCD LOCAL Ri9OORCI3 AND pROPOSID MITIGATIONS Gaa~ral Comm~nta State architectural historians Erom Cal[zans and thezr consultants surveyed each potentially historic site built prior to 1946 within 500 feet of the pzoposed freeway's centerline and produced a "Xistozical Architectural Survey Report.^ Under NEPA this revi ev utilized National Register Guidelines, pez Section 106 of the National Historic preservation Act, and thus sought to determine potential eligibility for the Register for each of [he surveyed sites. A number of the City's local resources, then, fell below the National Reqi ster's significance standard used by State historians in their revier but still stand Lo be impacted by the pro osed freeway extension. p Under CEQA the project's EIR/EIS would have to take into account the proposed freeway's impact on structures deemetl significant or potentially significant by local standards. Calt ram officials Rave claimed that NEPA icy R can supersede CEQA in projects Eundetl in part by the Federal Government. The City's legal counsel na! ~ ^ed that of rh9 ra li arcia Pre sc cyst io,: Pc ufidation in determining that CEQA standards for cultural resource review apply to this freeway project. The ineligible surveyed res ouicea in the Alta Loma and Etiwanda communiti ea which lie along Highland Avenue and various intersections are from Nest to East: the ell en Loeb House, 9911 Highland Ave.; the Nilleman Residence, 10067 HighlagQ Ave.; the X. W. Minor Residence, 10304 19th Street; the Gosney Ranch, 6922 Haven; Casaletti's Polka Palace, 125&3 Highland Ave.: the Ross House, 6527 Etiwanda Ave.; the Hemp House, 13151 Highland Ave.; and the Tibbetts I{ouse, 13710 Highland Ave. Noa-significant Structuz!•/SiL!• Ptoplrty: e Smpact: It appears Chet the proposed freeway =lght of line falls just on or directly south of this sire m;.,,. .arrny routs nave a severe impact on the site p it is p=obable that the site could be and destrcyed. Moreover, [t.e freeway alignment begins a 1.596 climb from a -0.47 depression at the Archibald intersection and the grade difference between the existing landform (noted on the included maps' cross-section rich a dotCed line) is approximately 35 feet. Therefore if the right of way does not 'take" the atructurls on the Loeb site, the construction of a retalning/sound wall seemingly could altez irrevocably the resource. There exists a strong possibility that the freeway will be zealigned Co retluce its impacC on the Maloof and Goexlitz properties and at this Lima it remains difficult to aspens Che final impaci of the proposed freeway. Proposed Mi ti ga ti one: None Recommendations: According to the State's research, the Loeb site hen undergone significant alterations. Although potentially significant due *_o the seeps of its uses, including rockers' housing i[ in questionable whether the site would meet local landmark critezia. proplrty: Th H'11 m Aw did ~a 10067 HiQblxnd Avenue Impact: The pzopozed right of way bisects this site and as with the Loeb site discussed previously any freeway realignment could alter Che site's final shape. Proposed Mitigations: None Recemmendati ons: Staff concurs with [he finding's of Caltrana' histoziana: "This house hen, been altered so aubaCantially that it is difficult to assess its original appearance," and therefore does not recoaxoend any mitigations. Dsoplrty: "jhp N N M;n r nw"idenGe 10309 19th street Impact: The Lull freeway alternative appea zs to require a ma jot poztion of the existing lemon grove above the Minor home. X05 R C Proposed Mi iigati ons: None Recommends [i ons: The Minor family decidedly played a significant role in the development of A1[a Lome and the struetura'a use as an egg ranch is an example of a use which is now very rare in our rapidly suburban azea. Furthermore, the house's settlnq, a lemon grove, is as the Architectuzal Inventory states; a verb raze example of what was historically the most conm~on land use pattern along the foothills. He encouzage the lead agencies to leave as much as passible of the grove intact. Diopaity: The Coanwv Ranch. 6472 Haven Impact: The proposed freeway would locate this site over 50 feet below the fzeeway and directly north of the eastbound off-ramp -- ~ ---- V Proposed Afitigati ons: None Reeommandati nns: Furthsz zesearch has determined that the one-time zancA does not zetain a great level of significance or integrity. Piapaity: The Tibbetfa Hovee. ?1010 Hi ehland Avenue Zmpact: The home would sit juet below freeway level directly south of the off-ramp leading to [he north-bound Interstate 15, antl thus be impacted by the fzeeway's construction. Proposed Mitigations: None Recommends ti Ons: Tae structure has been altered on numerous occasions and its significance does not appear to be of local Landmark quality at this time. Significant or PoCaatially Sigailicaat Iapaetad Structure /SStas Diapaity: Ca •al i'a Pnika Fala 1 5Ai Hi ghlartd Ae nnp Zmpact: The freeway as proposed would lie approximately 150 fee[ north of Casaletti's; and althouga not directly impacted, the stzuctures would decidedly be effected by tae freeway. Proposed Mi ti gd ti ons: None Reconm,enda tiom: Casalett is is an institution of local importance and a potential Local Landmark. Accese to thin complex is currently unclear and should be determined prioz to finalization of the environmental review process. There also aught exist archaeological deposits of significance about which the City should be informed. property: The Roaa Ho +~ 65 7 F iwanda Avw I oG R Impact: The houae would sit rithin 50 feet of the freeway and approximately 26 Eeet above freeway grads. Tha prcFoa?d fcaz::ay as re11 as coast cuct.ion of a barrier/aoundrall would seam C- i.:Fact this -it e. Acceaa to the home also is ambivalently defined, as it is not olear how or if Highland Avenue will continue along thin section. Proposed Hi tigati ons: None Recommendations: The Rosa family figured significantly in Etiwanda'a history and despite the lose of the front porch and related outbuildings, the family home remains locally aignlf Scant. We concur with State architectural histociann who found that the Roas home had lost much of the Roaa family-era details-- the large front porch, context, the outbuildings, citrus grove a, and other agcicultura Sly-related ~~..men[a. Horeve r, it does fall within the paiamete rs OL tan r: Cy't wl ~r nric PLe se LVat ion Ordinance, and is li at ad as a Potential Local Landmark, and de asCVea ndtigatiana undo[ CEpA. We recommend that prior to the completion of this Levier process, mitigation language be provided that compensates tot the taking of the pzopexCiea rindcor per a replacement program based on City s[andazda and that matters of access axe more clearly defined. A mitigation .monitoring and reporting pLOgcam would also be includefl. DSOpeaLy: fj~Eemm x ~~a 1'+ltl N'q~yland Ate. Impact: The eastbound freeway off-Lamp as proposed would lie 20 feet below and abut the property and thus bring the houae approximately within 30 feet of the nEt-ramp, The site would thus seem to be impacted significantly. Lt is also unclear at thin time the ultimate conf igucation of Highl anfl Avenue and therefore access to the home is ill-defined. Proposed Mitigations: None Aecommendati ons: Like the Roea Home, the Kemp family home stands as a reminder of Etiranda's citrus legacy--perhaps an incomplete remainders, having Lost an elaborate po cch and significant outbuildinga, but a locally aigni£icant aC zucture all the lama. Ali hough the State Findings seem to downplay the inq~ortance and longevity of the Kemp family in Et iwanda, it is true Chat the structure itself and its context have been altered and that these alterations have not achieved any keen historical sense of the iz orn. Lire Casaletti's and the Roaa House, Chia home is on the City's Historic Prope cty Survey. Ne ceconmend that the questions of access be defined clearly and that s suitable and dense landscape buffer planted to mitigate the visual impact of the freeway. In~