Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005/01/26 - Agenda Packet • • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ~UCAMONGA January 26, 2005 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TQ ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Macias _ Vice Chairman McN~el _ Fletcher _ McPhail _ Stewart II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES January 12, 2005 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related protect Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be l~m~ted to 5 minutes per individual for each project Please sign in after speaking A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request to subdwide 19 gross acres of land into 59 lots within the Low- Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55 thru 58 Related Files Development Rewew DRC2004-00052, Variance DRC2004-01002, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701 Staff has prepared a Negatwe Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA January 26, 2005 ~ cU ONGA Z B VARIANCE DRC2004-01002 - VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request for an increase in wail height related to 59 single-family homes on 19 acres of land within the Low-Medwm Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55 thru 58 Related files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776, Development Review DRC2004-00052, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701 V. NEW BUSINESS C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00052 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The review of site plan and elevations for 59single-family homes on 19 acres of land within the Low-Medwm Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue -APN 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55 thru 58 Related files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776, Variance DRC2004-01002, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration D DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00404-HOGLE-IRELAND, INC -A request to construct a commercial bwlding of 8,350 square feet for a retail use, a dental office, and a restaurant in the Industrial Park District, Subarea 7, located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Mayten Street -APN 0229-011-84 Related Fdes Development Review Modification DR99-11, Development Review Modification DRCDR99-11 MOD, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15630 Staff has found the project to be within the scope of a previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Momtonng Program adopted by the Planning Commission on April 28, 1999, and June 28, 2000, respectively, and a Negative Declaration adopted by the Planning Commission on February 13, 2002 This project does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the previous Negative Declarations VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the Ume and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be ' discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda • • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA January 26, 2005 jtAxcxo CUCAMONGA 3 VII. COMMISSION BUSINESS E USE DETERMINATION DRC2005-00002 -ALL ABOUT FUN LLC - A request to determine that an Indoor family entertainment center, Including Inflatable play equipment and games for birthdays, church and school fundraising, and corporate events, is simllarto Recreation Faculties and/or Entertainment land use categories within the industrial districts VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m adjournment time If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL ADJOURN TO A WORKSHOP IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING FOR A DISCUSSION REGARDING RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW 1, Gail Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on January 20, 2005, at feast 72 hours poor to the meeting perGovernment Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga ~~}~q.rsc~s~ If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Division at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ® ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired Vicinity Map Planning Commission January 26, 2005 J SPHERE O F I N F L U E N C E 4 ~ Q ~~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~~ WWt--~-F ~ ~HILLSID 4~,,, ~ -I I 'WILSON t~ I ~ i A f9TH`~-I---'J--'-G-~~-,.-~- ~ W W ~m W U ' _ Ci-Q /' ~ O w ~. ~ ~ ,' ~_ ` ---' -- ~_--- -~Cify Hall ~--- - ~~, O __ qC ---_ - ---- -- - - --- . C9 _ _ ~~ .,- - -- - -- Z' - -- ---_ --_ 2,--- ~I W --~-- J~--- ~ ~~ ~ i ~ A,68~C ~~ I ~~--~ ~ -BASE LINE -~---V FOOTHILL ----'---' ARROW I - ~~ y - W~4TH City of Rancho Cucamonga n T H E C I T Y O F RANCttO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE January 26, 2005 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Vance Pomeroy, Contract Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request to subdivide 19 gross acres of land into 59 lots within the Low-Medwm Residential Distract (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue -APN 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55 thru 58 Related Files Development Review DRC2004-00052, Vanance DRC2004-01002, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00052 - VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The review of site plan and elevations for 59 single-family homes on 19 acres of land within the Low-Medium Residential Distract (4-8 dwelling urnts per acre), located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue -APN 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55 thru 58 Related files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776, Vanance DRC2004-01002, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration VARIANCE DRC2004-01002 - VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request for an increase in wall height related to 59 single-family homes on 19 acres of land within the Low-Medwm Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55 thru 58 Related files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776, Development Review DRC2004-00052, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Density Zone range 4 to 8 units per gross acre, proposed density 3 1 urnts per gross acre Items A, B, & C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16776, DRC2004-00052, AND DRC2004-01002 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT January 26, 2005 Page 2 B Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Vacant and former Paafic Electric Railroad nght-of-way (future regional trail), Low Residential South - Attached residential Condominwm (under construction), Single-family residential (under construction), Medwm Residential East - Single-family residential and vacant, Low-Medium Residential, Office Professional West - Single-family residential, vacant, Low-Medium Residential C General Plan Designations Protect Site - Low-Medwm Residential North - Low Residential South - Medwm Residential East - Law-Medium Residential, Office Professional West - Low-Medwm Residential D Site Charactenstics The subtect site is currently an operating plant nursery with a former residence used as office space The former Paafic Electnc Railroad right-of-way/future regional trail runs along the northerly boundary The site generally slopes from the north to the southerly boundary at Base Line Road This portion of Base Line Road and the abutting parcel to the east are slated for street and I-15 off ramp re-alignment in the future. ANALYSIS • A General This protect is located within the Etiwanda Specific Plan and includes several particular site and architectural design requirements The lots range from 7,270 to 14,794 square feet in area with an average of 10,082 square feet The project provides a single access at Base Line Road and a second access on Lime Avenue from the existing tract to the northeast The two northerly cut-de-sac streets provide access to the future Paafic Electric Inland Empire Trail, a planned regional trail along the former railroad right-of-way Because of the future re-alignment of the I-15 off ramping system that would result in moving the ramp closer to this tract, the staff proposes a condition of approval that regwres the applicant to disclose this future re-alignment of the off ramp to the east The protect boundary walls are to be constructed to match the boundary walls provided along the south side of Base Line Road A condition to require removal of a building now situated across the westerly protect boundary has been provided in order to proceed with any further permits for the protect B Design Review Committee The Committee (Fletcher, Stewart, Coleman) reviewed the protect on November 2, 2004, and recommended approval subtect to particular improvements to the detention basin and making a good faith effort to provide trail access from the most northeasterly cut-de-sac (Exhibd "I") C Grading Committee The Committee reviewed the protect and recommended approval Like other protects in this area of Etiwanda, the drainage flows for this protect are proposed to be caught in an on-site detention basin pending the future completion of storm drain facilities for this area The detention basin is proposed on four lots to the east of the southerly access along Base Line Road The detention basin is temporary, and the lots will be developed with homes once the detentiori~ basin is removed after completion of the storm drain ~,~C a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16776, DRC2004-00052, AND DRC2004-01002 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT January 26, 2005 Page 3 D Technical Review Committee The Committee reviewed the protect and recommended approval subtect to the conditions outlined in the attached Draft Resolution of Approval E Neiohborhood Meetinct The applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting on May 27, 2004 The meeting was sparsely attended and the protect met with no dissatisfaction from the attendees Environmental Assessment The applicant completed Part I of the Irntial Study The staff completed Part II of the Initial Study in consultation with outside sources and found that there could be significant adverse environmental impacts on short-term air quality during the site preparation Such impacts would be caused by grading and egwpment exhaust Mitigation measures wdl be requred to reduce the short-term air quality impact to aless-than-sigrnficant level A noise study was also prepared to evaluate the impact of the freeway traffic noise on the proposed residential lots The study concluded that sound attenuation walls would reduce noise to acceptable levels The protect wdl also have an impact upon biological resources due to the proposed removal of 60 on-site heritage trees under the related Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701 application An arborist study was prepared to evaluate the health and condition of these trees The arbonst recommended removal of all trees except fora 29-foot Blue Atlas Cedar If the Planning Commission concurs, then an issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order VARIANCE FACTS FOR FINDINGS The applicant is requesting a variance to allow wall heights greater than 8 feet The site abuts Base Line Road, classified as a Mator Divided Highway in the General Plan, is approximately 500 feet from the I-15 Freeway travel lanes, and within 200 feet of the existing I-15 Freeway off ramp, hence, is subtect to traffic noise levels that exceed the City's standards The acoustical analysis indicates the need for sound attenuation walls up to 8 feet high relative to the pad heights, plus acoustic upgrades in the homes to reduce the noise to acceptable levels The purpose of a Variance is to prowde flexibility from the strict application of development standards, however, the Planning Commission must make the following findings in order to approve the request The wall height variances have been granted for all other residential protects along the I-15 Freeway The following are facts to support these findings Findin That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the speafied regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the obtectives of the Development Code FacUs The applicant has requested flexibility with the required wall height in order to construct sound attenuation walls to reduce traffic noise in compliance with the City's standards Variances for similar wall heights were granted previously for surrounding tracts Finding That there are exceptional or extraordinary arcumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district Facts The protect site is unusual because it is located adtacent to a mator divided highway and the elevated I-15 Freeway 3 Findin That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the speafied regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges entoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district ~-,~~3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16776, DRC2004-00052, AND DRC2004-01002 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT • January 26, 2005 Page 4 Facts Without the Variance, the protect would be depraved of privileges entoyed by other owners within the same district to develop single-family residences and to construct sound attenuation walls necessary to protect said homes from excessive traffic noise levels The proposed wall heights are consistent with those on surrounding properties for which the Planning Commission has granted variances 4 Finding That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special prnrilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties or improvements in the vicinity Facts Because the location of the site adtacent to a mator noise source is unique, the proposed protect will be in the spent of other variances that have been approved in the general area Findin That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements in the vanity Facts Granting of the Variance wdl not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or be materially intunous to properties or improvements in the vianity On the contrary, granting of the variance will reduce noise levels to levels consistent with City standards, hence, prevent exposure of residents to excessive noise levels Based on the above analysis, staff believes that there are suffiaent facts to support the findings. CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the protect through adoption of the attached Resolutions with conditions, and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration Respectt~ submitted Brad B r City Planner Attachments Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Master Plan Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "F" - Preliminary Landscape Plan Exhibit "G" - Streetscape Elevation on Base Line Road Exhibit "H" - Fioor Plans and Elevations Exhibit "I" - Design Review Committee Action Comments Dated November 2, 2004 Exhibit "J" - I-15 Freeway Off ramp Realignment Preliminary Plan Exhibit "K" - Initial Study Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776 Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2004-00052 Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2004-01002 ~-,~,c~ L J IL SITE UTILIZATION MAP TTM. 16776 crrv oc nu+a+o curwr~w,c.+ ~upm wu _ _ - _ - _.~ ~~ '~-~f!_-,1( i ~` (f ~ \VACMIi` ..YAGI(M~_.. .-~ ~ ~ / ' ~ _____ "A'~~ ~ M\__~ .~. X91 FAMRY ~~ Th' a-=- ..m~.~.m =)?mdwr~_/L"K`R_.'T_5 S'a"° ` __ -.-~-~ '..t~R= _ `- `.'_=3'.=- - ~ .- I ~~ __ ~ _. ~F f - -.a 11 . ~ ~ ~ `IS D y, ~~ k _ _ _..~~' N .R ~f ~ I ( ,I ~~~ ~~ _ ~ ~ ~ n ~~f _ /i - - t^ _ _ _ 1(~'~~~ ~ W ~,.i I~ _- ~ i~ r ~ ~ I 3i ¢i~ .~`Y y'. .. j _ ~ _-:I }ter ~ ~ i ~' 1 ' -~ L~ ~ © °'~" - _ - --~ Er-__ :, _ _~; ~; ~ 7_l~ ~.~.:~ J- ~" °~ mil` - f`,~ ~ t'~ r ~~' ,~," ,{ MA.• ~..a, ,., ,..,.,~- .~~.. • SITE PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT NO 78778 ms~ems~ ~$~ MIME 1R.Q ...~mo~ a,vso G.gY. - /. I / waNm MAP ~~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~~ Se..~ ° a i~ • i ~•, •-~ I II s I/~ Mfis 'r'te ~ I r1J~ ~ // 1 •e i ° '~~.~m ~~ i ~ ~ •m °M~~v ~~~ ~~~ ~.®.~.Y" ,nu ®.v,.w li ~~r~s.u ~uu I ~~ i ® ~.. '°4 18 gyn... ~„ ~ ~a { ~a1. ,~ ' ~ 11 ~-------------- I p® _ r ~ "i I -/ ~'/// ^ ~I -- ,_ --- ------L--- _ _~------------------- ---sIiEVUw-- ~: ,r.._,-,.. w. --~~- ~l ~ ~ •. II I ~ ~ 1` -_ I~ , I 11 ~ i 1 1 1 ~ ~ 1= ~~ _= ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~' OO ~ ~ ~ I ~• - I~ ~ •- \ \ \\ ~ .y ~ ` \ \ a~ i '~ ;& ~ I rNt , .~ .Q ~' f ~ I N .; ' i ~ '~ r i I 9~~~ ~ •~ li .~ 0aa ~j ~9f ~ ~ ° ~`I 1 ~ a ~~ ~ a ~ f I 1 ~ ' -\ on ~ ~'~ .~ `~y~i g 1 •~ ~ -- `,- ~~1 Ila ,~ i A 1 i 1 1~ 11 , `_ ~ 1 `-- II ~ t ~ @ i ~" ~~ ~' .& \ •~ voa,emava as as e a Ile ! t f'{ fl :i °1 ~e~: 0~ 1~ i~jl a~ ;! eef Afi ~1~ a ca °,a ;a ;a Fa la ~a ld; i' -~il ;a y ~ iai is 1 e; ~6 a6 `6 i6 SE 9i ~;~~ s' ~! `=i~ a- :, ~6e i~i ~i ;1 ~I $j ~I ~{ it °I ref ~i ii !!; j i• `0i ^f' sl If f~ If'i f~ 9g fl ;'i ai ~' s~ ``-i ,I i~ ~al 96 fi ~ f~ i~ °1 ~9 1.a °. ii I~' j0 01 ~t; ~~AAA I iii ° 1'; 6~ ~ q ~ti a~ 11; Il ~1 v i i E '~ i- i~` i 4i 1" i~ ~ i y\1 t 1i ~ 1.4 /~ 'p ~~ rl ~ e 6' i~ i8 E i, ~' ~~t~~ 6 p 9 1 la 1 ~~~ a i .! , ; $i ~~ ~ i ~~g ~~~~ ,'; 1 'sO 1 •e ~. m O Z C7 m v ~~ ~" Z i ~ ~~ CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN DETAILS AND SECTIONS rant is»s arc a nrtto~o cwnianra ~..F i ';~ ~F - ----------------- - -- -~ -- }~ '---- '~~J -- r-~ ~..~ -~`- 1 --~ --~ 7 r.. _. ~:.= :. ----~._ e~L ~• W M ~_ I II ` ~i 8~4 LNE XOV' ... ttra wee cmm I _~_= e - !_______ __rTMw c-r. J r~~ rte' _fe -- l~, ~3,C q ~~ n~ e JN r F 1 ttTS ~ •r PI~V4QV rt TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TTM 16776 ~~ an a nuxxo ciruaxu nm~u mnuxirc m~a (vrBw uvee~ nNmMnr - --- - -'- n n Q I I ~ I __ N -=S - n N y '° 1 m~::~~~.~ === 1- _ I - I _ .o ..mot ° ~ a ° I n I • • ~...~ ~~ -~ ~.~ m m ~ I ~~ _ ., .. - ~~~ e - ----n---- " ~ irr i ___ i b / ! i 1. 11 1. I ~ I ~ If '! ~ 9 < ie a ~ ~ ~ ! - ,~ I / f .,. ~ "~ - ss ~. p ! 51 y ~w!./ wr M!S • - fIMY~l I L 4 - ~ _ _ t ~ ~_~~ " ~ ~~ M!S '=~:6~--~ -- L - --__-__ ~ ___ -__--~HIELM N __-_ __ ~~m~elw~cr rw~me ~~~~ ~ •~ __-__- s ~__ vnN Owete ' /~ O ~ ems" "'~e2m"'°~"'° ~J~ dom.-4- ' o,m,n .m~ i i I i li P9 j e o* I ~ , § x < a~~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ d• a~~~ ~~ °~ ¢Qy~I C7 pd ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ( ~ a~i~ ~2~ w QQ +, f ~ ~ ~ d A F3Y~~ _a+ z w g I ii ~ ~5 y Q3 Eb 9Q 5 f 3 2 : ~ a°', x~~ ~ ~r i ~ ~ °~' ° 9 ~ ~~. ~ ~~` W C i < ~~ ~ Ca K°a y$. [6 '~ ~ C ~~Y O O a u o o a4 b o R ~ ~S sR o ~~ <~ ~~ ~ t w ~ ~~ 3 ~~ p 0O ~. -F- :~ p,aei~ r N a I ETIWAI`IDA ESTATES BASE LINE STREETSCAPE ~~ I ~ -m ~'TRACf 1691fi- RANCHONGMONGA CA AND PROJECT ENTRY - VAN DAELE DEVEIAPMENT p ~~ ~,~ ~~ ~ fIP,~ l~ j ~~~~i~i lfe b € ~ ill~~{F~~;~~I€f~{(l~ij~i=(~ % ;~Ei~~~fE { i~~~~ ~( g~g~~( ( ~ S~fdl~(~~f l~SSS(~II~ 1~5(ji [[ :(zi~f ~~tffi { ~ ` s i 3` E 1 s E q E q s. ~ (Ee{i'' "tits : - j'~:nrjur r 7.H :;~{t i '~ F a r ~Im ~-c--~_ _ _;; ~-_ i ~~ °'.~,,, ETIWANDA ESTATES TYPICAL FRONT YARDS ~~ ~ .o rv> ~ ____~_ ya't-AV nc.«wss i+c TRnQ m%'rn RAM1CHONCANONLnU PRELIMINARY DESIGN ~ SAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT _ -__ iL_ .., _. ..._ ..~~..M.n~.,,~.~ .n.~,..r.,. .. ..~ ___- i• VIA t e~ w~ ai FI d~ F -al ~ `~ v~ w~ ~ m~ a'~ '_! 3~ ~ eiil 1I M ~ • C~ ..y. • s S i (~ (Q(~ vv,\ Mip a: PIII! ~~'Y~ ~H~d glrPr fIr N1 I~^~~ II q~f-'~' F i IIYpLglll ~7fiNUl iwm+ iumr ~mumoq wia ~ VlIPI ,~ -- ~~N~~ u~xi ~ cum --' fegfl fem Ill HAOW1 BH4V17 irzuv nerv! FIRSf FLOOR ETIWANDA ESTATES ,,,.. VAN DAELE DEYFA.OPMQlPCORPORA71ON ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA Opl dm,Jmrgv FIRSTFLDOR=7,761SF TOTO,=1,764SF GARAGE=616SF Smle IH'=1'-0' ~I-S ~^ l " FROM Sale IN`-I'-0' PLAN I r ~ - LFff SIDE RIGHT SIDE ~~~ SryleA SFnnuh ETIWANDA ESTATES ~..,o,.,,o..,„„„,,,,~,,,,. ,.,,,,, „~., VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENTCORPDMTIDN M RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA P • • i ~~t-S ~~ ~J FROM Sak IA`-I'-0' rr~ L.J ~ -- LEFT SIDE ~, PLAN f SMe9 ~ry i RIGHTSIDE ETIWANDA ESTATES ,,,,,,,,,e„,,.,,.. o.~.~..~,: ,~~e VAN DAELE DEVELOPMEM'CORPORA770N M ' RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA ,... .p 0 9 `'d rr^^ U Vl ~ WO r 6 O ,~ I 1 I i ` tl !1 ~ .~~ q Q U ~1 r^ U W W A ~. zoo ~~ ~~ ~~ ~d wW 6 D G L t / / ~~ ~ / V C> LROM Sak 114`-I'-0' PLAN 1 sy~~D car~a~I~ LEFT SIDE RIGHT SIDE ETIWANDA ESTATES ~.,,o,,,,a..,,,,,, o.~,~.,,,e„ ,,,e VAN DAELE DEVELOPMFM CORPORATION RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA .~.. N y o ^~ ^ B o y h 4 .~ ~ o N ~^~ ~ ~ O CFA ~ 1 ~ N ~ V a ~y ~' ~' ~ -•-- ~., __ , i 4 L ~ _ I ___ __ _____ _~ ~` ' ~i c , ~ ~ e I ~ !! ,~ ~ y~,r~,cao W a o a U ~..,y l ~~//~~ Vl W A x V G C Fp a N W ~ 0 b a 5 e FQ pl e 1 L ~VI V ~. a U t W z 0 U Q~ U ~~//~~ V Vl w C A !~~+ zo ~~ ~~ ~~ ~s w~ w 6 ZG 6 ~~~,C o?I ~ ~ ~ 9 a ~ irei v Z ~~ ~. C.. `"'~ U z 0 f a V O S V aZ d v ~ ~~ ~~ii[~. O S v 0 mss' a a a U ~~ ~J ~xoxr Sak 114`-I'-0' RFAR -r ---_ _~_- ~ ~ I.F}T SIDE _---~` -- -,, R {`~ RIGHTSmE PLAN 2 QnWrom Sry~eC-Fmmhowt ETIWANDA ESTATES ~,.,,.. o.. _~..,~m.., „~.. VAN DAELE DEVELOPMEM CORPORATION M ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA P ~xaur Sak IN`-I'-0' RIGHT SRIE PLAN 2 n~ SryIrD-Cafifaeia Bmgvlmr ETIWANDA ESTATES ~,,,,,,~,,,~,,,,,, o,.~,~. w„,,, ,,,,, VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION M ^~ t RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA .4~i; M _ N 3 `_~ a_ h h ~ W . - 6 y S ~ ~ ~ U Cs v 5 ~~®3 ~ ~~ ~e tl S 'I ___ a _________; ___ _ ~ 4 ~~ ~ ~d ' q ~; li ~° d 5= t ~~ ~---1 ~i ~i SH rr^^ Vl W U V o ~ H ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ A F H W ~qqq ° 0 i ,, ~N 3 ~i i3,C oZ~ f g ~ o ~ a l._J 0 a a M p ~g $ .$ ~~~ -a ~' a v v Wo V U S V IA Z W 0. o 0 FZV W O D G E U C a C 0 u ~~~3,~ a~ n~ ~.7 ! ! FRDNf Salt 114`-I'-0' REAR PLAN 3 Elewhau SryleB-F.arlyCahJanm ETIWANDA ESTATES LEFT SIDE ~~ ~~ ~saa~o..~.,,d o.~.~..~.. ,~~., VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENTCORPDRATIDN ~ 1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ... FROM Sak IR'=I'-0' REAR PLAN 3 F~ew~~, SryleC-Fmmhaue ETIWANDA ESTATES ~,,,,.,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,~:„w,„„,,, „~o VAN DAELE DEVEIAPMENP CORPORATION M ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ,.. P,, ~1 L.J 0 a a U Q U z 0 f a V 7 U O S U i F I I /~~~ 02~ ~ "~ V o d. ~' I F"~ W C t ~ ~~~ 8 u `c b k 4 u S \~ ^~ 3 c ~~ I _________________________ fAIU ^,t ~ro1 O ^Atihxrewma fFlpAt ~^~^''~ amAmws rAa.rrmx ~; ~' IHINr ' ' IgINf ~ ~ W3IGGIA I PIIMI ~ VfIN1 pfIRI I n Y~r i , u __~___ „ '~ ~ 1R~ ~ ~ ~ 1JL t14 - _. ___ _ __ I &~ Em ______ __________ N1C fewW! uflNe _ IWIAli411 ~ ~~~~ ___ ~~ ~~ i , YlG00N 1 -- ' ___ z' ^1L _ i ~qp[ pY o ur 1111 ___ ,, < 1-- -unur ' _~ _ '~ 111X1 ~ ! ' ~ ~OtlPe YAOIL@ 1 1°"m Ilfllrf ~AI~IUZI Rlllrl I ~~! r _ ~_ ,~ , -„ , _--------------- -z_ -- -- ~~ A-'_=_~ ~1 _ --~ ~ - ~ ~ apfrtc.el tmUrsns / IfIN. S _ l`.INf _ glrBdmf ^ ~~¢1 = Q}FghN , SECDNDFLOOR FIRSfFL00R ETIWANDA ESTATES ~,,,,.,,,,a,.,,,,,M,,,,~„„„~„ ,,,., YAN DAELE DEYEIAPMENFCORPORA710N RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA a.. PLAN 4 1mrDu . FIRSTFLOOR=1,991 SF SEfONDFL00R=1,110SF TOTAL=4,111 SF GARAGE=611SF Smlr I/4'=I'-0' ~~~ _ a~:~ -_- .~ ~~ t- u FROM Salr 114`-I'-0" PLAN 4 StyleA SFmuth ETIWANDA ESTATES ,~~.. VAN DAELE DEVELDPMEM'CORPO0.ATION M~a~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA c~ nW. Y-/ FROM Seile 114`-I'-0" PLAN 2 ~4~a ~~~~ ETIWANDA ESTATES ~,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, o„~,w..,,,,, ,.,. VAN DAELE DEVEIAPMENiCORPORATION Mw' RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ~_ p~ W W FROM Sale 114'=1'~P LEFT SIDE _ - - i ® ~ ~ I RIGHT SH)E PLAN ~e~~ sryl~c F ETIWANDA ESTATES ... ~...o. s~„r~~s„w oa~.~, ~.. ,~~o VAN DAELE DEVELOPMEM'CORPORATION M RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA .... P` ~~ ~T FROM Snk 114`-I'-0' WGHT SIDE PLAN 4 Syle D-faly~ama Bwgabw ETIWANDA ESTATES ~,,,,,,,,,,,".,,,,,,,,,~,,,,,, ,,,,,,,: .,~.. VAN DAELE DEVELDPMEM'CORPDMTIDN pp RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA P ~ • s DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 00 p m Vance Pomeroy November 2, 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP - A request to subdivide 19 gross acres of land into 58 lots within the Low-Medwm Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55-58 Related Files Development Review DRC2004-00052, Variance DRC2004-01002, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701 Background/Design Parameters This pro/ect is the site of a plant nursery with a variety of trees and Eucalyptus windrows The historic Brownless House will be demolished as part of the development The site is bounded on the north by, and includes a connection to, the future Paafic Electric Inland Empire Trail The applicant is proposing four house designs for the protect designed to meet the regwrements of the Etiwanda Specific Plan in which the site is located Under the Etiwanda Specific Plan, this tract is developed under the Basic Development Standards and no specific architectural style is regwred, however, elements of the existing styles found in Etiwanda are regwred The applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting on May 27, 2004, which was sparsely attended Generally, the audience was satisfied with the applicant's presentation and no new issues were raised The applicant has been working attentively to resolve the issues that had been raised at the staff level, such as architecture, master planning, trail access, lot layout, etc A major issue for this protect through the staff review phase has been architectural design The original submittal provided for poor definition between styles, mammal detailing, and a lack of 360-degree design sensibility The revised architectural designs provided for the Development Review Committee (DRC) represent a substantial improvement The four styles provided in compliance with the regwrements of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan, Farmhouse, Califomia Bungalow, Spanish, and Early California are distingwshed by not only applied features but also variation in materials, roof shape, roof pitch, eave treatment, certain massing differences, and fenestration Differentiation between the Early California and the Spanish styles is made by deriving the primary elements of the historical Spanish Colonial Revival (arches, ironwork, etc) from the 1920's into the Spanish style and using Mission and Monterey elements (balconies, wood details, open rafter tads, etc) for the Early Califomia style b Substantial detailing is evident on all four styles by the richer use of materials The Farmhouse style, for example, now shows an extensive use of wood siding with some stone accents where stucco was the only material before c Appropriate treatment of all elevations with the features, massing and detailing for the four . styles, is presented N M ~j~lC~ DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP November 2, 2004 Page 2 Based on the regwrements of CEQA and Exhibit V-13 of the City's General Plan, a noise study was conducted by an acoustical engineer to address the potential impact of the noise from the Interstate 15 Freeway and Base Lme Road on the residential uses proposed m this project The engineer found that the traffic-related noise from Base Line Road is a source of significant noise impacts unless a sound wall 8 feet high relatroe to the pad height is constructed between Base Line Road and the back yards of those lots along the street in addition to any sound-deadening modifications that can be made to the houses A Vanance is requested for the additional height to reduce the noise impacts to a level considered less-than-significant Staff Comments. The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues• a A temporary detention basin is proposed on Lots 56-59 because mayor storm dram infrastructure does not exist m this area These four tots rear-on to Base Lme Road, hence, are prominent Planning Department's preference would be relocating basin to Lots 1-4 This would allow construction of homes on 6 out of 7 lots along Base Lme Road creating a more finished-looking streetscene Further, at such time as basin is removed and homes built, the construction of homes on Lots 1-4 would have less impact on surrounding neighborhood Secondary Issues Once all of the mator issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the . Committee will discuss the following secondary design Issues• 1 The southeastern portion of the project site abuts the southbound Interstate 15 Freeway off-ramp for Base Line Road Because the off-ramp is slated for re-configuration that will place it closer to the back yards of proposed Lots 48 through 54, a disclosure to the prospective buyers by the developer should be made that such a change is planned for the future 2 A detention basin, similar to the basin regwred and constructed for the adjacent tract to the east, is proposed to occupy proposed Lots 56 through 59 The noise attenuation wall proposed for the perimeter along Base Line Road should be constructed at the same time as for the other lots to provide a consistent streetscape design for Base Line Road Policv Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion No outstanding policy issues Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Committee review the project and recommend approval to the Planning Commission with the above conditions Attachments Design Review Committee Action: Members Present Coleman, Fletcher, Stewart, Staff Planner Vance Pomeroy ~(~/~ ~ DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP November 2, 2004 Page 3 The Committee recommended approval of the protect subtect to the following conditions and revisions The northerly penmeter of the temporary detention basin shall be improved in a manner similarly proposed for the front yards of the residences The basin shall be also improved with a wrought iron fence and landscaping The sound wall shall be included in the improvement of the temporary detention basin lots The applicant shall make a good faith effort to investigate providing a trail access atthe end of the most northeasterly cul-de-sac (now known as Street "C") ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ - _ ~ l E -- A _ ! - 'O i p - M ~ ~~ ~®I r s®~ °~~ ac t d< ~ ai °® 8® s~ 9 a~ e® ~@ ~ a~ °~ :® r N ~:_: ~~ .. J~~ =~ ~® _ a~ ~i a ~' ~' ~ _ ,, I' ,~ ~~ __-~ ai / <~ _r r .,.r" - C> _ - _ ~' T_ _ - _ ~ -__ of / - r,3 __ ~ ~ .~.; ~~~ z • f 1 ,~ // •} ~, Gy o/ Rendro Cucanpnpa Planrunp Dimon ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) Applicahon Number for the pro/ect to which this form pertains TT ~ (77 Pro/ed Title T T N o I IoT! Iv C ucamolinga R. aloe NameBAddresso/pro/ectowner(s) I-OVCN GEC/ QQ/`~a/Q ~'Yt h3 G~~ ~~a''k ~SthS~o~. 13 I oy (3 G Se (tnP Q-c~ Rd~cl,e ~uc cw~o.+ u l I d'6 aPcati AVP ~auc~e Cuc~~-e~f~ Name&Addressof developerorpro/ectsponsor ~0~ ~a~lt ~AMMJni'Ii~tS LLG 290o A-~CUns Sfiraci- C-2S R~J<rs~te Ctr 9zSa4 Contact Person&Address J1evC, r; A/t H*L«- ZkOO Adams 5~1-ie.ct C- Zr RsUcv3~le C~ R2so`{ Name 8 Address otpers"_on preps-nt~ng, this form (d different from ablove) lJ'cna5 lr II~Q ~MQM / ~'II CI/K~tM ~~'l~,'I CC{~ 221 5. 6lassell .`fi'cct ORanr~ a [A R2.8 ~ b Telephone Number 7~ 4 7~ ~'" q u o EnNronmentallnfoFOrmt doc Page~1 Created on 5/2212002 4 09 PM /i/~i l~ INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILLNOTBEPROCESSED Please notethatitistheresponsibil~tyol[heapplicanttoensurethat the application is complete at the time of submittal, City stag will not be evadable to peAonn work required to provide missing in/ormahon PROJECT INFORMATION B DESCRIPTION: I bon Indicated by an asterisk (') Is not required of nonconstmcbon CUP's unless otherwise requested by stall •1) Provide a full scale (a-12 x 11) copy of(t~he U'SGS Quadre t Sheet(s) whlgh mGudes the pro/ect sde, and mdlcate the sRe boundaries .~jt~f'r~~ c~'->~7~~r~+' ~ h" `+v l 2) Pmwde a set of color photographs that show representahve views Into the site from the noRh, south, east and west, views Into and from the sde from the primary access points that serve the site, and representative views of signficant features Irom the site Include a map showing location of each photograph 3) ProtectLocahon(describe) p,,,~~ ~,.Jgnd4 ~t112 pnA E7.45'~" /1~LNdl~ Narii. dp 8u,5elrhe 4) Assessor'sParoelNumbers(attachaddltlonalsheetdnecessary) 0227- I3~- Z~, 34~35tJ_bTS2T53 022'7- 131- 55 5(0 57 58 _ A2~ 9n0 '5) Grass Site Area (adsq ft) / 9 ~ ~8_ ~ L ~ $~ ~ '6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public sheets 8 proposed dedications) 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project sRe (attach add~honal sheet d necessary) NONE 8) Include a description of all permits which wdl be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies In order to fully Implement the pro/ed 1 ~i TraCl Mo ~voc~lHJ nr2Yt~+~,/ ~H~vaac~m~a~ /~rn.,.~ SIN ®~' 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the pro/ect including Information on topography, Boll stabll~ty, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures Attach photographs of significant features described In addition, cite all sources of information (~ a ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies) 7~P rr~P if as• o~Pr4fiyl nUrtPry qvr~ /~~/ 1'{/~vo/ ~vft'NyldU/eJ Ayr nurh~vu~f 7~~*rs ~~ sale. Oar eKiJf'i.iL r)hj~P ~(j11/i ~y {'Cfl tIfHCP fi /octi)tc'~ cH fair yjvo~7P/f~ TyhtruQ rertdrwhG/ f~~+J Jorvoyyf fG,P Yel/~PNC~'. EnvironmentallnfoFOrmt tloc Page F Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM ,C/ ~r C~ `4V C _J Ah f ~/I ~l'~/ 1a 20// ucyP r.~ hd/fl+ o~ ~~P nvuA~//~t~ f~/d/fh 'f"~-P fv~/ier~ `av~~fcr 4JY av(r/gyf/ ~b~e~ ~/ew• r ~rCe l r~ U f 0) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site Cite all sources of information (books, published reports and oral history) NUNt kne~n. 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that how affect the site (arrcreR, roadway noise, etc) and how they wdl affect proposed uses , 7ti~ >c~Prw~ o~~ra ~~~ hc./e%y~ /lve~rre ~vo FF(c coa , ~iulx -~-- na(sP , 12) Describe the proposed pro/act in detail This should provide an adequate description of the site m terms of utt~mate use that wdl result from the proposed pro/act Indicate if there are proposed phases for development the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment Attach additional sheet(s) Anecessary I ! ~t° ,0l~0 IPc~ C.Ir`/ ~e G !/Hf `P ,y/,~1'? ~ f ri ~/P ~ ~~r~ f l5 haiurl de fGG~i~c~ ors 1'~C~A~''~C ~6 ~I /~ in ~ 1~/ ~jql/h 4.t ~~ ho toti 1 ~r u c ~e.d -`o // r'1I'~'r S'G /-C S ~o rr~, ~/aws'~ EnhronmenfallnfoFOrmt doc Page 3 ~~ ~/ C Createtl on 5222002 4 09 PM 13) Describe the surrounding properties, mcludmg mformahon on plants and animals and any culturel, historical, or scenic aspects Indicate fhe type of land use (resdential, commerc~at etc), intensity of land use (one-fam/ly, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) Tv tAt nor~L lv g V/r?ya`cP ><~ ~~~ n~/fye4ft ut1,1 Pall^ II G .rl~-s/~ p~avni~y rfr/dfp~la/ JvGr~/I/1ri6~ . Te ~'~P fOU TGr IJ G ~jro/lorP~ Cdl'1(PON4fV( tuH+ ~YO~ecQt' unG~i~ CaN ftYuC~'fQh 7p f~* wPlf ql'P IPVC9$/ ~Ncll~vfolva/ hurhvl' a4 /assn ~ofr 14) Will the proposed protect change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the proled~ ~~ n~oiPC¢ wf~ll ~ hati~ llee c~rGVU~fr~ f{-orh G% cam-~e~~/c~ tiu~r~vy k, ~ rl~r P -Fq,rtl -I ti d>~ e I f1-P 15) Indicate the type of short-temr and long-term nose to be generated, mcludmg source and amount How w01 these noise levels affect ad/scent properties and on-site uses What methods of soundproofing are proposed Sye~% ern, vto-rP cufG1 1rP StNra~/t~ by ,l ~t- ~ c fior, e / nt rh'y ~ h J ~-~~~. H I J? ~vo~, ~'~•«q a l~ar.e/l~P avt~ f~'t~Fi~ wll/ be n,t~(ja wl ~ 1'obhowgllr, "16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees ~ r J rr ~i / / G hl//I f/ / qa~ I/ ~i//~ D~ 'e~vPl~ ~r / S[l'e~ e~(CP/~1' Kjr ~~ J'fhf/P VPJ/r,~{~jCP fv~ilCr~1 ~QJ ~ 1j- UJ1 (D )!/~PeJ /~/4Ctnrehf u F O~Q f~vQ2p t PPP Xi Pr n B,w hots, ~ w ~ ~/ N1 t ~IJ c l[ the ~-te /ort. 17) Indicate any bodes of water (mcludmg domeshc water supplies) into which the site drams f~v9/rI4 q~p /f ~ C! {!~/ r~4.I~fl~ ~lll`IbP(~ P fd frH+ ~~Y~ /~1 i EnWronmentallnfoFormt Ooc Pap/~e/y4 Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM /"////~ -/V` 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further c/anfication, please contact the Cucamonga County Wt~aterpDistnct at 987-2591 3/ O d d Peak use (gaUDa G~ ~0 a Resdenhal (gaVday) ~_ Y) / b CommeroiaVlnd (gaVday/ac) - Peak use (gaUmNac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal ^ Septic Tank Sewer If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests If discharge to a sanitary sewage system Is proposed Indicate expected daily sewage generet~on (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clanficahon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Dlstnct at 987-259`1 a Residential (gaVday) ~/~~ b Commeroial/Industnal (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: p 20) Number ofresidenhalunits o 7~~ ~ ZO 00(7 Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size .S, C Attache (militate whether units are rental or for sale units) l~/ 0 r/.e r 1 u 21) Anhc~pated range of sale pnces and/or rents salePnce(s) $ ro $ NoT Y eT p ~7~M/,~/EY] Renf (per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number ofbedrooms by unit type P-5M ~ 3 b~ 2 y b~ 3 5 h ~' `1 w h ~ 23J Indicate anhcrpated household srze by and type p ~ q h "+- z y 3 S En~ronmentallnloForml dot Page 5 Created on 5/22!2002 4 09 PM ~, ~, ~ ~3 24) Indreate the expected number of school children who will be residing within fhe pro/act Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown rn Attachment B a Elementary b Junior High c Senior High COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 251 Describe type of use(s) and ma/or (unctron(s) of commercial, rndustnat orrnstdut~onal uses 26) Total or area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type 27) Indreate hours o erehon 28) 29) Number of employees Total Maximum Shift Time o aximum Shrtt Provide breakdown of ant~apated lob cla cations, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an ind~cadon oI the rate of hire for each c/assificahon (attach addit~o I sheet rlnecessaryJ 30) '31) Eshmat~on of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside rn the ty For commercial and mdustnal uses only, rnd~cate the source, type and amount o it pollution emissions (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-62 En~ronmentallnfoFOnn1 doc Page 6 Created on 5/2 002 4 09 PM ~~~r~ ' Y ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agenaes serving the pro/ect been contacted to determine them ability to provide adequate service to the p/roposed[[prolect~ If so, please mdlLLCate their response G'ccu,M e~ Q LV/.• f /,ia /{r ~l//Y/C~ yk GII CP ~f f~W e/ ,~wJ c.~e, 1-Pr cbr, bP ~vdv ded 1,/¢ ti« kof ~ e f /rtyP~ a `t wl(l r~vU~ °ls~Gti /=1rt' ~/I/ h{ revfPwe~ dv~l a1 TTM - b~uCVtr ~/o oc~ ~dnh-d/ hf/ h~P< dircufr'or/ wlf~ --r ~4~ c, lh , 33) In the known history o/this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals~ Examples of hazardous and/or foxrc materials include, but are not limned to PCB's, redioachve substances, pesticides and her6rcides, fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage of any of the above Please list the materials and describe them use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known . ~~r ,4'1r•khawy, tiotr~rv.r ~l~ rl~ it a avvrrYy auk a+Gy hat.-v ~.Gm .{shirt lP/ G'H~ e7,°/~fti~P/ 34) X11 the proposed prolecf involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or foxrc materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials fo be used and proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans /~d h-~ I hereby certAy that the statements fumrshed above and in the attached exhibits present the data and informabon required for adequate evaluation ofthrs pro/ect to the best ofmyabil~ty, that the facts, statements, and information presented are hue and correct tot he best o/my knowledge and belief I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made 6y the City of Rancho Cucamonga Date l~ ~ ~6 Signatu2 Q~/~t ~~~u~O'~y' Title c I vi ~ L-=~G //UEL-1L En~ronmentallnfoForml doc Page 7 Created on 5r12/2002 4 09 PM ..n c< v f" n_ C sv' _ <d~-~.w....aS~q.~ _ ~_.~..~..._..__.r 1 M~~ al Geographic Moldings ~~ V/ ~ "'Y'l!/ BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II Project Fde: Tentative Tract SUBTT16776 2. Related Files: Development Review DRC2004-00052, Variance DRC2004-1002, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16776 - VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request to subdroide 19 gross acres of land into 58 lots within the Low-Medum Residential District (4-8 dwelling unds per acre), located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55-58. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00052 - VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The rewew of sde plan and elevations for 58 single-family homes on 19 acres of land within the within the Low-Medum Residential District (4-8 dwelimg units per acre), located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue -APN 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55-58 VARIANCE DRC2004-01002 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request for an increase m wall height related to 58 single-family homes on 19 acres of land within the within the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Base Une Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue -APN• 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55-58 Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Van Daele Development Corporation 2900 Adams Street, Suite C-25 Riverside, CA 92504 5. General Plan Designation: Low-Medum Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) 6. Zoning: Low-Medium Residential Distract (4-8 dwelling units per acre) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting (Briefly describe the project's surroundings): The protect site is located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue, on the site of a landscape nursery A vineyard lies north of • the site An abandoned railroad corridor (tram tracks have been removed) runs along the site's northerly border and is planned to be the Paafic Electnc Inland Empire regional trail and future transit corridor. To the east are single-family residences, a /~ C, ~"0 Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 vacant parcel, and the southbound Base Lme Road off ramp of the I-15 Freeway. To the west is pnmanly vacant land with a couple of single-family residences near Base Line Road South of the protect site is Base Line Road, further south of which is a condommwm protect under construction 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Vance Pomeroy, Contact Planner (909)477-2750 t0. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): Regional Water Quality Control Board -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Discharge Permit City of Rancho Cucamonga Vanance GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used In this report: EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NOx -Nitrogen Owdes ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management Distract URBEMIS2002 -Urban Emissions Model ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this proied, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 2 (/) gesthetics (/) Biological Resources (/) Hazards & Hazardous Matenals ()Mineral Resources (/) public Services O UGhties/Service Systems () Agncultural Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) HydrologylWater Quality ()Energy and Mineral Resources (/) Noise (/) Recreation (/) Mandatory Fmdmgs of Significance (/) qtr Quality (/) Geology/Sods ()Land Use/Planning (/) Population/Housing (/) Transportation/Traffic n LJ /~i~- ~ ~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 Page 3 DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (/) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there wdl not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by agreed to, by the project proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATIO will a prepared Prepared By nd ~ Lon o ilburn or oration Date Reviewed B Date Z ~/~ /7/ Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS City of Rancho Cucamonga Pape 4 Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Palanbally $~yuficant Less Than $igrvficanl WiN A4bpabon Less Than S~prvficant No i a m yea i a i a 1. AESTHETICS. Would the prolect a) Have a substantial affect on a scenic vistas () () () (~) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, () () (~) 0 including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual () () (~) ( ) character or quality of the site and its surroundmgs~ d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (~) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments: a, b) According to the City's General Plan, the prolect site is not within a scenic vista/scenic highway view corridor Although the prolect will result in the removal of trees and the demolition of a 1907 structure previously identified m the 1987 survey, nearby streets including local portions of Interstate 15, Base Lme Road, and Etiwanda Avenue are not considered scenic routes, the trees are subject to replacement and the 1907 house does not appear to meet the city's criteria for landmark status No impact would result c) The proposed prolect includes the development of 58 single-family homes on 19 acres of land. The prolect site is designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 units per acre) This development would be consistent with the surrounding land uses The visual character of the site would be harmonious to its neighboring residents The proposed prolect would not impact the aesthetic significant aesthetic environment of the area d) The prolect would create new light and glare because there would be a greater number of houses and residents utilizing lights m various forms There would be the addition of street lamps as well The design and placement of street lamps must be shown on site plans, and would be reviewed for consistency with City standards Since the site would produce similar effects as the present surroundings, it is not considered remarkable, the impact would be less than significant /'~ ~~ji Irntial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 5 Issues and Supporting Information Sources PdenfiallY $igrvfi,ant Less Tfian $igNfiom iN N4Lgafion less Tlwn $,gnfirem No I C In lei 1 h 1 C 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () () (~) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, () () () (~) or a Wiliamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing () () () (~) environment, which, due to their location or nature, could result m conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural uses Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The mator concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development Furthermore, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland according to the General Plan Land Use Plan The site is not within this area However, the General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council b) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned for agricultural uses and no Williamson Act contracts within the City There is no impact c) The proposed 19-acre protect site is currently used as a planUtree nursery and would be cleared to allow the development of 58 single-family homes within the Etiwanda Speafic Plan No impact would occur since farmland would not be changed, converted, or otherwise affected ~i~, C ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 Page 6 Issues and Su ort,n Information Sources PP 9 Pamuauy sw.r~n ~ mm, aw~na~, m eawaua, ~~ ~ s~a.e~i ru i a m ,~ i a i a 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the prolect a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the O O (/) ( ) applicable air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contnbute O (/) U ( ) substantially to an existing or protected air quality wolation~ c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net () () (/) ( ) increase of any criteria pollutant for which the prolect region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions, which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial () () (/) ( ) pollutant concentrations? e) Create oblecGonable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people? Comments: a, b, c)As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development wdl contnbute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State air quality standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a sigmficent unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Counal The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Pian for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The proposed development of 58 single-family homes on 19 acres located between Etiwanda Avenue and the I-15 Freeway on the north side of Base Line Road, would contnbute to pollutant levels in the area during construction and prolect operations Construction emissions were screened and quantified to document the effectiveness of control measures The URBEMIS 2002 program was used to evaluate the proposed prolect The model separates emissions estimated based on the phases of constriction activity and the year in which the particular activity will transpire The criteria pollutants screened for included reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrous oxides (NO,), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulates (PM,o) The emission levels listed reflect the estimated winter season levels, which are normally higher due to increased use of heating systems The three classic construction phases for most protects are demolition, site grading, and building URBEMIS 2002 calculates emissions assuming the three phases do not overlap It was assumed that construction of the site would begin in 2005 and be completed by 2006 The prolect site was screened under its proposed f~i ~ C ~ a- Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 Page 7 land use of Low-Medium Residential Furthermore, two houses will be demolished and the 19-acre site would ultimately contain 58 single-family houses Tables 1 A and 1 B list emissions for 2005 Table 1 URBEMIS2002 Site Grading Emissions Summary /Pounds oer Dav) Source ROG NOx CO PM,o Md. Mit Md Md Demoldwn - - - - Site Gradin ROG NOx CO PM,o Fu hive Dust - - - 20 00 Off-Road Diesel 17 23 144 19 118 01 6 72 On-Road Diesel 0 19 0 37 3 93 0 00 Worker Tn s 17 42 0 37 3 93 0 02 Total 34 84 144 93 121 4 26 74 SCAQMD Thres. 75 100 550 150 Si nificance No Yes No No Table 1A URBEMIS2002 Construction Emissions Summary !Pounds oer Davl C J • Source ROG NOx CO PM,o Mit Mit Mit Mit Bldg Const 14 11 114 73 99 27 5 28 Worker Tri s 0 28 0 16 3 36 0 04 Arch Coatin 237 04 - - t7 04 As halt 0 65 2 64 0 50 0 06 Total 252 08 117 53 103 13 5 42 SCAQMD Thres 75 100 550 150 Si nificance Yes Yes No No During grading activities, exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and egwpment and fugitive dust generated by egwpment traveling over exposed surfaces, would increase NOxand PM,o levels in the area As shown in Table 1, emissions for NOx would be exceeded Implementation of the following mitigation measures wtll reduce impacts 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agents (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management Distract and Regional Water Quality Control Board) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, m accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) Base Line Road shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 5) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. As indicated in Table 1A, the construction emissions exceed the SCAQMD thresholds for two of the four criteria air pollutants, ROG and NOx The construction of the site is antiapated to exceed threshold levels However, the construction emissions are short term (approximately eight months), and will be below threshold levels as indicated in Table 2, post-construction phase. The following mitigations measures will reduce impacts 6) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The construction contractors shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 7) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 9) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions on Grading Plans and initiate on site when appropriate or as soon as feasible: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. r-1 LJ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 Page 9 • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 10) Construction contractors shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 11) Construction contractors shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. As shown in the Table 2, emissions associated with post-construction activities and would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds Development of the 19-acre site, to include 58 single-family houses, will create an additional 628 daily taps Emissions associated with the proposed land use would not exceed SCAQMD threshold for criteria pollutants and would therefore be less than significant ~~ Table 2 URBEMIS 2002 Operations Emissions Summary /Dnn nric nor r1aVl Source ROG Unmet Met vM NO^ Unmet Met CO Unmet Met PM,a Unmet Met Area Source Mobile Source 2 89 6 91 2 89 6 91 0 74 7 36 0 74 7 36 1 02 85 23 1 02 85 23 0 00 6 40 0 00 6 40 Totals SCAQMD Thres. Si nificance 9 89 55 No 9 89 55 No 8 10 55 No 8 10 55 No 86 25 550 No 86 25 550 No 6 40 150 No 6 40 150 No d,e) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term healthcare faalities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 Nearby sensitive receptors include residential neighborhoods to the east, northeast, west and the residences under construction immediately south of Base Line Road Once construction is complete, post-construction emission levels are well below SCAQMD thresholds as indicated in Table 2 The proposed residential development would not generate obiectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated ~~ ~l Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 Page 10 Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 '°`°°Ua~ly s°,veram Lass Than s°mfiranl ill, lNU°aLm Lass ma° SigNficenl NO 1 n In led I d I d 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly () () () (~) or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on npanan () () 0 (~) habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (~) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any () () () (~) native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corndors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances O (~) O ( ) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordmance~ f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat O O O (~) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments: a,b) The 19-acre project site is currently a working planUtree nursery surrounded by existing and proposed residential development, and vacant land According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3, the site does not occur within area boundary of any sensitive biological resources c) No wetland habitat is present on site No impact would occur I~ d) The protect site is currently used as a landscape nursery Residential land uses and vacant land surround the protect site to the east, west, and south, and Base ~if~r~~~ Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paoe 11 • Line Road occurs to the south of the site The surrounding areas would not serve as a wildlife corridor, no impact is prolected e,f) The southern half of the project site is currently used as a landscape nursery A variety of mature trees exist on the property, including Red Gum Eucalyptus windrows along the eastern property boundary, and near the center of the site An Arborist Report (Sims, March 31, 2004) was prepared for the site to evaluate the health of on-site trees The report documents 60 heritage trees on the property, including 45 Red Gum Eucalyptus Other trees include Modesto Ash (5), Ligwdambar (4), Ornamental Pear (2), Brachychiton (1), Monterey Pme (1), Mondell Pme (1 ), and Blue Atlas Cedar (1) The arborist recommended removal of all trees, except for the Blue Atlas Cedar The report concluded that on-site trees posed a safety hazard, due to the multiple topping, which permits decay and increases the potential for branch failures Since eucalyptus trees are protected by the City Tree Preservation Ordinance, removal of the trees is considered significant However, implementation of mitigation measures listed below would reduce this impact to less than sigrnficant 1) New eucalyptus tree windrows should be planted to replace existing red gum eucalyptus trees in the manner specified in the New Windrow Planting Guidelines within the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 2) The Blue Atlas Cedar shall be preserved through relocation supervised by a licensed arborist. Said tree shall also receive proper treatment for wound at base of tree to protect against decay and disease. Care shall be exercised by all individuals, developers and contractors working near the tree to preserve and protect the tree in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, including, but not limited to, enclosing the tree with a protective chain Imk fence prior to the issuance of any clearing and grubbing permit, grading or building permit. Protective fencing shall remain in place during all phases of construction and shall not be removed without the written consent of City Planner until construction is complete. The protect site is surrounded by single-family residential and vacant land, and is within the Low-Medium Residential District The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to General Plan, Exhibit IV-4, Open Space and Conservation Plan No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur ~~ ~t ~ .~"! Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 12 Issues and Supporting Information Sources PolenlallY S~gruficant Less Than Si9^~ficenl MAUbpauan Less Than Sgrvfiwnl No I C Ie0 I cl I of 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () (~) ( ) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (~) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique U (~) O ( ) paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those () (~) () ( ) interred outside of formal cemeteries? Comments• a) As concluded in the Cultural Report prepared by MBA on July 29, 2004, the protect site does not appear to qualify as a "Historic Resource" per the criteria of Rancho Cucamonga Muniapal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) Additionally, the site is located in an area that is nearly surrounded by development, and, to date, no resources have been uncovered in the vicinity of the protect site No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area No adverse impacts are anticipated b,d) There are no known archeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) Construction actiwties, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. r~ L.J {~tCJ/C.~O Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 Page 13 • Propose mitigation measures and recommend considerations of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) Upon human remains encountered during excavation associated with this project, all work will halt and the County Coroner will be notified (Section 5097.98 of the Public Resource Code). The Coroner will determine whether the remains are of forensic interest. If the Coroner, with the aid of the supervising archaeologist, determines that the remains are prehistoric, the Native American Heritage Commission will be contacted. This commission will contact the most likely descendant who will, within 24 hours, then make recommendations. This may include the scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials. c) According to the San Bernardino County Museum database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago durng the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary penod, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modem man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The protect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures will be implemented 3) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval ofearth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. ~~,t^_~! Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 Submit summary report to collected specimens with a County Museum. City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 14 City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer copy of the report to San Bernardino Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp Q Paenua"Y Signfiont 1e55 Than s°"fi°"' iV, A4e6eYOn less '°°° 9gnfiont No i a m yea i a i a 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (~) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Paolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mmes and Geology Special Publication 42 n) Strong seismic ground shakings O O (~) ( ) w) Seismic-related ground failure, including O O O (~) liquefaction? iv) Landshdes~ O O U (~) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of () () (~) ( ) topsoil c) Be located on a geologic unit or sotl that is () () () (~) unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (~) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial asks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting () () () (~) the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? r~ u ~l ~ ~U Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 • Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site, it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Speaal Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault The Red Hill Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes within 1 9 miles northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 2 9 miles northwest These faults are both capable of producing a moment magnitude (Mw) 6 0 - 7 0 earthquake, respectively Also, the San Jaanto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7 5 earthquakes is approximately 16 miles northeast of the site and the San Andreas Fault, capable of producing up to Mw 8 2 earthquakes, is approximately 18 miles northeast of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking and fault rupture The applicant will be regwred to conform to the Uniform Bwlding Code to ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant According to the General Plan EIR, there are three types of ground failure that could occur within the City liquefaction, differential compaction, and subsidence Liquefaction occurs when loose saturated cohesion-less sods are subtect to ground shaking during an earthquake of large magnitude Additionally, liquefaction may occur when the water table is less than 40 feet below ground surface Based on ground water depths within the area (an average of 400 to 500 feet below ground surface, the potential for liquefaction within the protect area is unlikely In addition, Figure 5 1-2 of the General Plan EIR identifies only a few isolated areas in the City where liquefaction could occur These areas are located in the southwest portion of the City near Red Hdl The proposed protect is not within this area. Differential compaction is the term used to describe areas prone to different rates of surface settling, with or without seismic shaking, which are underlain by sediments that differ laterally in composition or degree of existing compaction The General Plan EIR identified the former marsh areas of Red Hill as the only area within the City limits that is likely subtect to this potential hazard The protect site is not within this area According to the General Plan EIR, the only portions of the City that are subtect to potential landslides or slope failure are in the northwest corner of the City and the foothills north of the City limits These areas have some slopes steeper than 25 percent, and include Red Hdl, the bluffs along upper Cucamonga Creek, and the foothills at the north edge of the City The possibility of a landslide in one of the canyons resulting in a damaging mudflow is remote because thick sods have not accumulated in the canyons The protect site is not subtect to landslides or mudflows as it is in an area that is relatively flat and developed with urban uses b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is subtect to strong Santa Ana wind conditions from September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Pape 16 landscaping are established Mitigation measures listed m the air section of this Initial Study would make this impact less than significant c) Subsidence is the general lowering of elevation that may result from withdrawal of flwds from the ground or movement in the earth's crust Widespread subsidence, on the order of one to two feet, has been predicted for the southern part of the City The protect site is not located in the southern portion of the City and therefore is not subtect to subsidence, there are no known indications that this is occurring d) A seiche is an oscillation of water in a lake, reservoir or other water body The pro/ect site is not located near a surface water body Therefore development of the site would not expose people or structures to any potential seiche impacts The site is not within a 100-year flood plain as shown on Exhibit V-5 of the City's General Plan The nearest open channel, according to the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit V-6, is located near the northern boundary of the site The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial sod deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expanswe e) The proposed development would connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed Issues and Su ortln Information Sources pp Q P01enta1y SipNfignl ~ s'°'""~"' iN A4Lpa0on ~~ ~" $iprvfirenl No I C I Ie0 I CI I d 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the prolect~ O O (/) ( ) a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () (/) ( ) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident considerations involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous () () (/) ( ) or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of O O U (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment ~~, ~ lQa- • Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 17 Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 8 Polenbally &Bmfitanl Less Than Signbrvnl WM Miboaban Less man $ignfiwnl No I C In tetl 1 d I h e) For a project located within an airport land use () () () (~) plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the pro)ect areal f) For a project wdhm the vicinity of a private O O O (~) airstrip, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere O O U (~) with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk () () () (~) of loss, intury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adtacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wddlands~ Comments• a,b,c) Since about 1961 to present day, the property has been used as a landscape nursery. On December 22, 2003, LOR Geotechnical Group, Inc conducted a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) Although the testing found trace levels of soil contaminants, no significant organochlorine pesticides were present in the near-surface soils All levels reported were below EPA's preliminary remediation goals for residential soils Furthermore, no additional tests were deemed necessary A Phase II ESA has been conducted by the Applicant Any findings regarding demolition of existing on-site structures will become conditions of building permit issuance The potential for significant impacts to the public, from the site is determined to be less than significant d) The protect site is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact would result from development of the site e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within two miles of a public airport Protect site is located approximately three miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path There is no impact f) The nearest private airstrip, Cabie Airport, is located approximately 2 5 miles west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga ~i ~ C ~-3 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 Page 18 Fire District in the event of a disaster Access to the site is by Base Line Road No impact is anticipated h) According to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City According to General Plan Exhibit V-7, the proposed protect site is not located within a high fire hazard area Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Foteneally $ignfiwnl Lass Tlwn Sipnfiwnt YVIVi ALYpa4on Leas Then SiBnfiwnt No i a m eiaa i a i a 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project () () () (/) a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge regwrements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or () () () (/) interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficd in agwfer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of () () (/) ( ) the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of () () (/) ( ) the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or aver, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off- site~ e) Create or contribute runoff water which would () () (/) ( ) exceed the capaaty of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? () () (/) 0 g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard O O O (/) area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place wthin a 100-year flood hazard area O O O (/) structures, which would impede or redirect flood flows ,~,~~~ ~~ Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Pape 19 Less Than Less Issues and Su ortln Information Sources PP 9 Foleneally Sigmfcanl sgnirwm With Mmga~on rha~ Signilcanl No Ingad Inco IeC Im ad I ad i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk () () () (/) of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp ~) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (/) Comments: a,e,f) The project applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Thielmann Engineers, June 21, 2004 The WQMP identified the Best Management Practices (BMP's) or pollution control measures that would be implemented onto the site m order to reduce the possibility of pollutants entering drainage systems and disruption water quality Oil, trash, debris, grease, organic compounds, pestiades, or sediment from landscaped areas are a few of the typical pollutants related with residential developments Source control BMP's include low-flow head sprinklers in front yards, as well as landscaped and vegetated swales, pamphlets distributed to each homeowner encouraging the use of drought tolerant landscaping and low-flow irrigation for backyards The Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) would provide water and sewer service The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems The WQMP identifies Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm dram system The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of fj ,~ c ~s Irntial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 Page 19 Issues and Su ortm Information Sources pp g Polenually SiBnificanl Less Thai Sipnificanl Wih MNpafion Less Than Slgafipnl No I ct Incor aced I C I cl i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk () () () (~) of loss, iniury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp ~) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ O O O ) Comments: a,e,f) The protect applicant has submitted a WOMP, prepared by Thielma Engineers, June 21, 2004 The WOMP identified the Best Management Prac es (BMP's) or pollution control measures that would be implemented onto t site in order to reduce the possibility of pollutants entering drainage systems rid disruption water quality Oil, trash, debris, grease, organic compounds, p shades, or sediment from landscaped areas are a few of the typia3l pollutan related with residential developments Source control BMP's include low-flo head sprinklers in front yards, as well as landscaped and vegetated swales, mphlets distributed to each homeowner encouraging the use of drought tol nt landscaping and low-flow irrigation for backyards Furthermore, exces storm water runoff would be conveyed toward ahomeowner-assoaation ned and maintained, grass-lined detention basin for natural water storage an infiltration and would not affect water quality standards or waste discharge requi merits The Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) would prowde water a sewer service The protect is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems The WOMP identifies Best Management Practices (BMPs) to inimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded sods, entering the drat ge system after construction Runoff from driveways, roads and other imPe~meable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods Structural control used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit s~ arators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls focus on controlling ollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sedimen3 control plans, and various Business Plans that must be develope by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials Practices, such as riodic~parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants nteripg the storm drain system The following mitigation measures would be a uir~d to control adddional storm water effluent /Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paoe 20 ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project wdl be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan, prepared by Thielmann Engineers, June 21, 2004, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to General Plan Exhibit IV-2, the proposed proiect would not deplete groundwater supplies nor would it interfere with recharge since it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground The development of the site would require grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing agwfer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface The CVWD, which oversees any groundwater pumping or recharge activities, would supply water for the proposed development Therefore no impact to groundwater supplies would result c,d) The Drainage Report, prepared by Thielmann Engineers, June 22, 2004, indicates that the existing storm drain facilities are insuffiaent to handle the flows anticpated after protect completion The report substantiates the need and provides for the design of a detention basin to handle the anticipated flows The proposed protect would cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new . building and hardscape proposed on site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river The protect design includes an on-site detention Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 Page 21 basin that is designed to handle the flows The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion The Bwiding Offiaal and City Engineer must approve a grading and drainage plan prior to the issuance of grading permits The protect would not result in substantial erosion, siltation, or flooding on- or off-site The impacts from drainage would be less than significant g,h) According to General Plan Exhibit V-5, the protect site is not located within a 100- yearflood hazard area No adverse impacts would result Q The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm dram system designed to accommodate a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debns dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 According to General Plan Exhibit V-5, the protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area No adverse impacts would result C~ ~) There are no oceans, lakes or reservoirs near the protect site, therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of insignificance within the City This existing system includes several debns dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~°~'„~,~ ~ Less man , ~ ~„~,~~, Less 9V~bon~ Ne i n in goo i n i n 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the pro/ect. a) Physically divide an established community () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, O O O (/) or regulation of an agency with tunsdiction over the protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, speafic plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation () () () (/) plan or natural community conservation plan Comments: a) The protect site is zoned as Low-Medium Residential The protect includes the development of 19 acres into 58 lots of single-family homes The protect would not physically divide an established community Since it wdl be compatible with the zoning and immediate land uses, there is no impact b) The proposed protect was designed in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, however, proposes a Variance to increase /~j ~,~ ~~ Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 22 perimeter wall heights to attenuate traffic noise from Base Line Road and the I-15 Freeway This wall height increase is necessary to comply with General Plan and Development Code standards for noise levels within residential neighborhoods Similar walls were constructed in 2004 along south side of this portion of Base Line Road by other housing developers The proposed protect of 58 single-family residences on 19 acres does not conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction of the protect for the purpose of avoiding mitigating an environmental effect Therefore, no impact would result c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources Development will not adversely affect any rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the proposed project would be surrounded by similar land uses to the south, west, and east There are no applicable habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans that concern the project site Issues and Su ortm Information Sources PP 9 °amuanY ~a~n®m i c Lass T"en s'°"'fi°a"' wpm FLl,aauoa i" tao Lev ma" s~we~eni n No i n 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Result m the loss of avatlabdity of a known O O U (~) mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of avadabillty of a locally () () () (~) important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the City's General Pian, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, there is no impact ~1 ~' C ~ r1 Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 23 Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Polenaelly Sipmfipm Less Than SiBnifipnl M A4apaaon Less Than Slpmfi,anl No I n In aleE I cl I 11. NOISE. Would the pro/ect result ~n a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise () (/) () ( ) levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of () () (/) ( ) excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient () () (/) ( ) noise levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in O (/) O ( ) ambient noise levels an the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect? e) For a protect located within an airport land use () () () (/) plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private O O U (/) airstrip, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels Comments: a) The proposed protect is the construction of 58 single-family residences immediate north of Base Line Road between Etiwanda and East Avenues An Acoustical Analysis prepared by Gordon Bracken & Associates (GBA) indicated that traffic noise from Base Line Road, Interstate 15, and the southbound I-15 Freeway off ramp, would be the dominate noise sources for the area GBA reviewed the proposed protect to determine compliance with City of Rancho Cucamonga noise control requirements of an exterior noise level of 65 CNEL and an interior noise level of 45 CNEL CNEL is the sound level in dBA which corresponds to the average energy content of the noise being measured over a 24-hour period Exterior Noise Level Future traffic data for Interstate 15 was received from Caltrans District 8 Base Line Road forecast traffic volumes were estimated from published City traffic data Expected future roadway noise impact was protected using the Federal Highway Administration's Highway Noise Prediction Model (FHWA RD-77-108) Future traffic noise will exceed City, FHWA and Caltrans noise limits for exterior ~l~~C ~~ Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paoe 24 uses (e g backyards) for units located along Base Line Road (Lot 1 and Lots 54 through 58) and for units located along the east side of the site including Lots 47 through 53 The following mitigation measure will ensure extenor noise levels for these units are reduced to acceptable levels 1) An acoustical sound wall wdl be required at a height of 6 feet for Lots 47,48, 49, 50, 51, and 52, 7 feet for Lot 54, and 8 feet for Lots 1 and 53, in order to reduce extenor noise levels at or below 65 CNEL. The walls shall be constructed of approved materials and as specified in the Acoustical Analysis. Walls heights greater than 8 feet shall require approval of a variance application. Interior Noise Levels Most of the structures on the lots listed wdl be exposed to exterior noise levels as high as 74 dBA CNEL This will requre interior noise reduction levels as high as 29 dBA Since standard construction materials would yield only around 20 dBA, specific room calculations need to be carried out to determine the degree of additional mitigation needed The following mitigation measure would ensure interior noise levels for Lot 1, and Lots 47 through 58 would be reduced to an acceptable level 2) Once building plans are available, an Acoustical Analysis shall be prepared to determine the building mitigation required to meet the 45 dBA CNEL Interior noise standard. 3) The developer shall provide written notification to all home buyers that the I-15 Freeway/Base Line Road interchange is planned to be reconstructed in a manner that would shift the southbound off ramp closer to the tract boundary. The remainder of the lots will receive sufficient shielding from intervening houses and wdl not require additional noise control measures beyond construction details contained in the acoustical analysis in order to comply with the interior City CNEL limit of 45 dBA b,c) The protect site as well as the surrounding area is zoned Low-Medium Residential Residential developments and vacant land exist to the west, east, northeast, and south of the protect Post construction activities would not generate noise levels that would vary from the surrounding land uses The proposed development would not result in significant or unexpected noise level increases in the area d) Construction activities would increase ambient noise levels for the surrounding area Residential uses occur west, east, northeast, and south of the site Implementations of the following mitigation measures would ensure short-term nose impacts are reduced to a less than sigmficant level ~~ 4) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or national holidays. ~-,~-~ ~o Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 Page 25 5) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Division. Said consultant will report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant would immediately notify the Planning Division. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with city noise standards or halted. e,f) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and there are no public airports or private airstrips near the site Airports and associated operations would not impact the site Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP A Po11~"Y $i°rufignl ~~ ~ s°"'"`~"' WMf.Lipe4°n ~~ T"°" $,qufiten~ No ~ ~~ ~" a~«, i n ~ n 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, () () (/) ( ) either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () (/) ( ) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The 19-acre protect site would be developed with 58 new houses According to the City's Planning Department, approximately 3 183 people per residence are estimated Based on this assumption, this would result in approximately 185 people are expected from the new development Existing sewer and electrical service are located adjacent to the site and would serve the protect No extensions of maior infrastructures would be requred b, c) Two houses occur on-site, neither of which are occupied, and would be demolished to allow for construction of 58 single-family homes The impact is considered less than significant !T( ~t Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paoe 26 Issues and Supporting Infortnatlon Sources P°'~^^°"Y $ipvfignl ~~,~°n av"fi~^' iN NLLp44on ~~ TMd" SigNfie3n1 NO I cl In IFd I cl I 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result rn substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facrl~tres, need for new or physically altered governmental facrl~t~es, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance ob~ect~ves for any of the public services O O (/) O a) Fire protection b) Police protechon~ O O (/) ( ) c) Schools O U (/) ( ) d) Parks? O O (/) O e) Other public facilities? () () (/) ( ) Comments• a) Fire Protection -The protect site is located on the north side of Base Line Road between Etiwanda and East Avenues There is a temporary fire station located on the north side of Base Line Road between Rochester Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard west of the protect site, however, a permanent fire station is under construction on west side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Base Line Road, approximately the same driving distance from subtect property There is also a fire station north of the site on the west side of East Avenue between Banyan Street and Wilson Avenue b) Police protection -The site would incrementally increase the need for routine police protection services In accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, the applicant will pay appropriate development impact fees as adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The City contracts with the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department (SBSD) and currently has 110 uniformed officers assigned to the City With an estimated population of 154,800 people, the ratio of officers to citizens is approximately 1 1,400. The proposed protect would generate approximately 185 people. This would result in a demand of less than a one percent increase in officers to maintain the City's current level of service The impact is considered less than significant c) Schools -The proposed housing development would generate additional students for the local school districts Based on a total of 58 houses, 36 students would be generated in the Etiwanda School District and 16 high school students for Chaffey Joint Unified High School District The applicant would be required to pay appropriate impact fees In addition to the primary and intermediate schools, the City of Rancho Cucamonga includes three high schools within the Chaffey Joint Unified School ~~,~~~- Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paoe 27 District Capaaty for the high schools is estimated at 15,485, but total enrollment was tabulated at 19,567 in year 2001 Portable classrooms are used to alleviate overcrowding problems Funding is the deterrent to facility expansion and the City and school districts are addressing the problem by requesting for State and federal funding The City also meets the needs for schools by collecting developer school impact fees The elementary and the high school districts share revenues generated by the school impact fees of which the developer will have pay the appropriate amount The proposed protect would not have a significant impact on schools d) Parks -The proposed housing development would not generate a substantial number of new people within the area According to Figure III-10 of the City's General Plan, a neighborhood park, Windrows Park, exists northwest of the site on Victoria Park Lane Developer Impact fees are collected at the time of building permit issuance (see 14 a below) Therefore, the new development would not cause a significant impact to existing parks e) Public faalities -The proposed development would incrementally impact traffic on adtacent streets According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, the applicant would be regwred to pay appropriate development impact fees as adopted by the City Council J u Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~~ ~"; I a Less then ~, ~,u,~~o~, In te0 Less sl~~a,,, 1 N, a 14. RECREATION. Would the pro/ect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () (/) ( ) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational faalities or () () () (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational faalities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment Comments: a) The addition of 185 residents within the area would require an additional 0 92 acres of parkland for the City to maintain its policy of five acres of parkland per 1,000 residents The applicant will be mandated to pay development impact fees as an alternative funding source for adding park acreage or making park improvements The proposed site plan includes three letter lots to remain as open space in the form of a grass-lined water detention basin to be maintained by a homeowners assoaation Impacts to existing recreation facilities would be less than significant b) The protect does not include recreational facilities or directly require the construction or expansion of recreational facdrties ~~,~ ~~ Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 28 Issues and Supporting Information Sources P°'~°~Ilr Sigrvficam Less Tian S~prufi°"' ,N MNpab°n Less Tian 9prvficenl No I a In IeE I a I a 15. TRANSPORTATION(fRAFFIC. Would the pro/ect a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial () () (/) ( ) m relation to the existing traffic load and eapaety of the street system (i a ,result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capaety ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a () () (/) ( ) level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result m a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (/) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design () () () (/) feature (e g ,sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capaety~ () () () (/) g) Conflict with adopted pollees, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g ,bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments• a,b) The proposed project includes the development of 58 single-famtly homes Based on the number of lots and residential land use, Urbemis 2002 was run to compute the number of daily taps Based on 10 8 taps per umt per day, the proposed project was projected to generate a total of 628 average daily taps The proposed project proponent would be regwred to construct the necessary street improvements as contained in the conditions of approval for the protect, and pay traffic impact fees as established by the City Counel to off-set the incremental increase in traffic as a result of the protect c) The project site Is located approximately three miles northwest of Ontario Airport, north of the flight path The development would not be dangerous to the site occupants or Ontario International Airport aircraft d,f) Access to the site would be from Base Line Road, a mayor divided arterial street that includes a raised median island with no access openings, hence, egress from project site is limited to right-turn movements only The lines of sight for vehicles traveling either east on Base Line Road are clear and provide unabated views to oncoming cars or pedestrians No sharp curves or dangerous intersections would be associated with the project The internal streets would C~ ~/ r/~ ~ 6 / Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16776 8 DRC2004-00052 Page 29 • provide adequate space for emergency access No impacts associated with safety hazards or inadequate emergency access or parking is anticipated with the proposed protect g) The protect site is located on the north side of Base Line Road between Etiwanda Avenue and the I-15 Freeway According to Exhibit III-7 "General Bikeway Plan," the site is located adjacent to a Class II bikeway on Base Line Road Ciass II bikeways are located near the shoulder of roads and share the pavement with vehicles They are special lanes set apart with proper signage The proposed protect is not anticipated to cause hazards to bicyclists or pedestrians in the vicinity or conflict with policies supporting alternate transportation The protect design also includes access to the planned Pacific Electric Inland Empire regional trail (Class I Bike Path) within the abandoned railroad corridor along north tract boundary n CJ Issues and Supporting Information Sources aamwlly SipNfiom Less Than siONncanl M A40pauon Less Than 9yilfi®nl No I q Inc letl I cl I C 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project () () () (/) a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water () () () (/) or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (/) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve () () () (/) the protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater i i () () (/) treatment provider, which serves or may serve the pro)ect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (/) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes () () () (/) and regulations related to solid waste ~}~~, C ~S Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 30 Comments: a) The proposed protect will include the construction of 58 single-family houses on 19 acres The development would be served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District sewer system, which has wastewater treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga The protect is requred to meet the requisites of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are protected b) The proposed protect would be served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District water and sewer systems Wastewater is treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the PR-4 treatment plant located within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and PR-1 treatment plant located within the City of Ontario, neither of which are operating at capacity Development of 58 single-family homes would not require the construction of new water distribution, sewer collection, or wastewater treatment facilities c) The proposed site will include the construction of an underground storm drain system designed to handle a 100-year flood event Site storm drains would empty into existing storm drains in Base Line Road The proposed protect also includes the construction of an 80,000 cubic-feet water detention basin created to mitigate flows d) The proposed development would be served by the Cucamonga Va„ey Water District There is currently sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No impacts are antiapated f,g) The current aty contracted hauler would provide solid waste disposal needs for the proposed development Waste would be disposed of at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacty to handle solid waste regwrements The protect would be required to comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939, which regwred a 50 percent reduction in the amount of waste deposited in landfills by the year 2000 There are no impacts to solid waste management protected Issues and Supporting Information Sources PotenYally Sipnfianl fees Than 9pn6onl MMIUpa~ ye=s 7twn SIpN5 ant Nod 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade () (/) () ( ) the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife speaes, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory • ~~ ~- ~ ~~ IF-~ Initial Study for SUBTT16776 8 DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 31 Issues and Supporting Information Sources PolenLally Sipmfipnl I h Less Ttwn Sipruficanl Wifi M~fipaaon Inc algid Less Than 9prufiom I d No I d b) Does the protect have impacts that are () () (/) ( ) individually limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future prolects)~ c) Does the protect have environmental effects () () () (/) which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments: a) The protect site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified in the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Currently, the site is utilized as a tree/plant nursery Adtacent lots to the east, northeast, south, and west are developed or proposed for development Based on the surrounding residential development, nearby I-15 Freeway and the adtacent Base Line Road, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species inhabit the site Furthermore, concerning the issues with the eucalyptus tree windrows, mitigation measures 12, 13, and 14 would reduce the impacts to less than significant with mitigation incorporated Concern for prehistoric and historical features can be mitigated to a less than significant impact with the incorporation of mitigation measures 15, 16, and 17 b) The proposed development of 58 single-family houses would add approximately 185 residents to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and cause short-term impacts to air quality and noise Other residential developments occur immediately south of Base Line Road, to the east and northeast, as well as to the west All service providers have confirmed their ability to serve the proposed development This represents a population increase of 0 12 percent in the City, which does not exceed population build-out estimates asserted in the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The General Plan was recently adopted along with the certification of a Program EIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse effects to air quality, the acoustical environment, library service, aesthetics, and casual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, yet, they would not reduce impacts to less than significant levels As a result, the City adopted Statements of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts ((CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these Findings and Statements of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is regwred ~/ r J~ ~ / Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Pape 32 c) The proposed development would not cause substantial adverse effects on humans, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identified construction- related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would diminish once construction actiwties are completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts assoaated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in Section 11 of this Initial Study would ensure impacts are reduced to less than significant levels EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Acoustical Analysis Tract 16776 City of Rancho Cucamonga, prepared by Gordon Bracken and Assoaates, March 29,2004 (/) Arbonst Report for the Fritz Property San Bernardino County, California , prepared by Sims Tree Health Specialists, March 31, 2004 (/) Water Quality Management Pian for Van Daele Development, Inc ,prepared by Thielmann Engineers, June 21, 2004 (/) Drainage Report, prepared by Thieimann Engineers, June 22, 2004 (/) Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment and Limited Site Characterization, prepared by LOR Geotechniaal Group, Inc ,December 22, 2003 (/) Preliminary Soils Investigation, prepared by John R Byerly Incorporated, January 5, 2004 (/) Cultural Records Search and Survey, prepared by Michael Brandman Assoaates, March 29, 2004, as rewsed July 29, 2004 (/) Etiwanda Speafic Plan, City of Rancho Cucamonga, 1983, with amendments through September 6, 2000 ~i~~ ~ ~g ~~ Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 33 I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have rewsed the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur Applicant's Signature Date lZl t`E l~ Pnnt Name and Tdle ~-rJheh S ~ ~ihq ~ xeLu-~i~/e U~~ ~~S . ~~ ~` ~9 City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration rs being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Prolect File No.. Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776 and Development Review DRC2004-00052 Public Review Period Closes: January 26, 2005 Protect Name• Project Applicant: Van Daele Development Corporation Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55 thru 58 Project Description• A request to subdivide 19 gross acres of land into 59 lots and the development of 59 single-family homes within the Low-Medwm Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) Related File Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701 FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding. ® The Initial Study shows that there ~s no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ^ The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions m the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report wdl not be requved Reasons to support this finding are included m the attached Initial Study The project fde and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period u January 26 2005 Date of Determination Adopted By ~/ ~~ ~~ • RESOLUTION NO 05-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16776, A 59 LOT SUBDIVISION OF 19 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,200 FEET EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, AND 55 THRU 58 A Recitals 1 Van Daele Development Corporation filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subted Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application " 2. On the 26th day of January 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and coned 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public heanng on January 26, 2005, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a. The application applies to property located at Base Line Road, approximatey 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue with a street frontage of 706 feet and lot depth of approximately 1,350 feet and is presently improved with a plant nursery and office, and b The property to the north of the subbed site is vacant and former Pacific Elednc Railroad nght-of--way, the property to the south consists of attached residential condominiums and ~~ single-family residential, the property to the east issingle-family residential and a freeway off ramp, and the property to the west is single-family residential and vacant, and c The development is proposed to include the development of one single-family residence on each lot except for the temporary installation of a detention basin for drainage control on four of the lots, and d All parking and circulation requirements are met ~, 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of fads set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows ~~~~ ~ 8~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-04 SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP. January 26, 2005 • Page 2 a That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speafic plans, and b The design or improvements of the tentative trail is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speGfic plans, and c The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable mtury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and e. The tentative tract is not likely to cause senous public health problems, and f The design of the tentative tract vnll not conflict vnth any easement acgwred by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property wnthin the proposed subdivision 4 Based upon the facts and information contained rn the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all wntten and oral reports mGuded for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect Moll have a sigmficant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Momtonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared m compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration wrath regard to the application b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect wall have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resouroes orthe habitat upon which wnldlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. • /~~ ~ ~~" PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-04 SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP. January 26, 2005 Page 3 Planning Department 1) The northerly penmeter of the temporary detention basin shall be improved m a manner similarly proposed for the front yards of the residences The basin shall be also improved with a wrought iron fence and landscaping 2) The sound wall shall be mGuded in the improvement of the temporary detention basin lots 3) The applicant shall make a good faith effort to provide a trail access at " " C the end of the most northeasterly cul-de-sac (also known as Street and Acom Place), if feasible, to overcome grade differential with the future regional trail to the north 4) The sound walls delineated in the acoustical analysis must be provided on all lots to be improved including those lots that will contain the temporary detention basin. Provide details in the plan and the elevation of the venous sound walls 5) The protect boundary penmeterwalls shall be constructed in a manner to match the penmeter walls on the south side of Base Line Road with nver rock plasters and slump stone cap 6) The developer shall provide wntten notification, in a format approved by the Gty Planner, to all home buyers that the I-15 Freeway/Base Lme Road interchange is planned to be reconstructed in a manner that would shift the southbound I-15 Freeway off ramp and create a new "cloverleaf' on ramp closer to the tract boundary 7) No permit or further approval for this protect shall be forthwming hereafter until the bulling now situated over the westerly project boundary (across the property Ime) m the viGrnty of the proled's proposed Lot 1 is removed m accordance wrath the California Building Code and to the satisfaction of the Budding Official Engineenng Department 1) Base Lme Road frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Mator Divided Arterial" standards including, but not limited to, the followmg• a) Right-of-way shall be 60 feet measured from street centerline along entire protect frontage b) Provide curb, gutter, 5-foot Hnde curvilinear sidewalk, and asphalt pavement, as regwred /~/ ~, ~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-04 SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP January 26, 2005 Page 4 c) Provide landscaped median on Base Line Road along entire protect frontage with no openings The existing median in Base Line Road to be protected and reconstructed, as needed. d) Provide 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights along Base Line Road frontage. e) Provide a Class II Bike Lane along protect frontage f) Provide traffic signage, striping, and R26 "No Stopping" signs, or replace, as required g) Provide a westbound nghf tum/deceleration lane for traffic entenng subdivision 2) Internal streets to be improved in accordance with City "Local Residential" standards, including, but not limited to, the following a) Provide curb and gutter and property line-adtacent sidewalk, as required b) Provide 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlights, as required c) Provide traffic stnping and signage, as required 3) Construct Etiwanda/San Sevaine Interim Master Basin No 56 as follows, tustified by a final drainage report approved by the City Engineer a) Provde an ultimate design for the basin to serve the entire developed tnbutary area south of the future regional trail and east I of Etiwanda Avenue , b) Install sufficient capacity to mitigate the increased runoff from this development with an outlet system capable of handling the ultimate basin design (entire tnbutary area) with a minimum amount of modification as incremental development occurs c) An assessment distnct shall be formed for maintenance of the detention basin or a maintenance agreement shall be executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing pnvate maintenance of the facility but providing the Gty with the nghf of access to maintain the facility if pnvate maintenance is insufficient and allowing the City to assess those costs to the developer Said agreement shall include a cash deposit as secunty for any maintenance costs the City may incur Said agreement shall be recorded to run with the property d) The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the proportionate co~ost o/f~the~/l[a~nd and ultimate basin PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-04 SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP January 26, 2005 Page 5 related facilities (outlet, etc) from future development using the basin If the developer fails to submit said reimbursement agreement vinihin 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all nghts of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate 4) Install local storm drains to convey development drainage to the Intenm Master Basin No 56 onsite Extend the local storm drain system as far on site as needed to contain Q25 within tops of curbs, 0100 within nghts-of-way, and provide a 10-foot dry lane in Q10 The cost of local storm drains shall be borne by this development with no fee credit Design local storm drains for ultimate connection to the existing MPSD in Base Line Road a) Final drainage study shall address whether the lateral in Lot 31, taking undeveloped runoff from the north side of the future regional trail, is still needed or if it can be replaced moth a fatality taking trail runoff only to Street ' E " This will also affect Intenm basin sizing and whether any of the off-site flows should be directed to existing Basin SA. b) Where storm drams are available, provide catch basins in lieu of cross gutters. c) Both catch basins and laterals at west end of Street "D" shall intercept Q100 Final drainage study shall address both the Intenm (proposed) and ultimate (Street "D" extended to west) development conditions 5) Lots containing the interim basin shall be encumbered by a temporary public drainage easement 6) Connection to future Pacific Electnc Inland Empire Trail through the Street "E" cul-de-sac shall be a sidewalk easement equally split between Lots 31 and 32 (property line in middle of sidewalk) 7) The existing overhead utilities (telecommurncations and electncal, except for the 66 kV electncal) on the protect side of Base Line Road shall be undergrounded along the entire protect frontage, extending to the first pole off site (east and west), poor to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first All services crossing Base Line Road shall be undergrounded at the same time. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recoverone-half of the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement vinthin 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all nghts of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-04 SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP January 26, 2005 Page 6 8) If the existing overhead utilities along the west protect boundary serve any of the Not-A-Part parcels to the west, then perform undergrounding and provide a public utility easement along the protect boundary If not, then remove the overhead utilities 9) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to 1 foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages 10) Provide a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and identify applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the grading plan 11) Maintenance of BMPs identified in the WQMP shall be addressed in the project CC&Rs Environmental Mdigation Arr Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agents (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct [SCAQMD] and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Base Line Road shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PMio emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMio emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions 5) Pnorto the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submd construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be, utilized, or that there use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff 6) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The construction contractors shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication Q ~~'/r ~ Q PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-04 SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP January 26, 2005 Page 7 7) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray 8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 9) All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall mGude the following provisions on Grading Plans and initiate on site when appropriate or as soon as feasible Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time Schedule activities to mirnmize the amounts of exposed excavated soil dunng and after the end of work penods Dispose of surplus excavated matenal m accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineenng practices Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is tamed over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of yearof construction Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , Hnnd speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 n:quvements Maintain a minimum 24-mch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means 10) Construction contractors shall utilize electnc or clean altematrve fuel powered egwpment where feasible 11) Construction contractors shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not iri use Bro/ogica/ Resoun:es 1) New eucalyptus tree windrows should be planted to replace existing red gum eucalyptus trees m the manner speafied m the New Windrow Planting Gwdelines within the Edwanda Specific Plan 2) The Blue Atlas Cedar shall be preserved through relocation supervised by a licensed arbonst Said tree shall also receive proper treatment for PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-04 SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP January 26, 2005 Page 8 wound at base of tree to protect against decay and disease Care shall be exercised by all individuals, developers, and contractors working near the tree to preserve and protect the tree in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 19.08 110, including, but not limited to, enclosing the tree with a protective chain link fence pnor to the issuance of any clearing and grubbing permit, grading permit, or building permit Protective fencing shall remain in place dunng all phases of construction and shall not be removed without the wntten consent of the City Planner until construction is complete Cultu2/ Resoun;es 1) If any prehistonc archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropnate measures to protect or preserve them for study nth the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will Enact intenm measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for ' the Gty to establish its archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using theirspecial qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological hentage Propose mitigation measures and recommend considerations of approval to eliminate adverse probed effects on significant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, follovnng appropriate CEQA gwde6nes ' Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting ' the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with onginal illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) Upon human remains encountered dunng excavation associated with this protect, all work will halt and the County Coroner will be notified (Section 5097 98 of the Public Resource Code). The Coroner will determine whether the remains are of forensic interest If the Coroner, , with the aid of the supervising archaeologist, determines that the remains are prehistonc, the Native Amencan Hentage Commission will be contacted This commission will contact the most likely descendant who will, within 24 hours, then make recommendations This may InGude the scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native Amencan bunals PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-04 SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP January 26, 2005 Page 9 3) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the protect sde The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also prowde speGfic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i a ,paleontological monitonng) that may be appropnate Where mitigation monitonng is appropnate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the follownng measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with mammal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found wnthm an area being Geared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and not~ty the monitor of the find. Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens wrath a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading perrmts, the permit applicant shall submit to Bwldmg Official for approval, a Stomt Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) speufiGally ident~tymg BMPs that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction acbwties entenng the stone dram system to the maximum extent practical 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, mGuded in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies speGfic measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall mGude the followrng measures at a minimum a) Speaty the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy penods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program wnthin a speGfied time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel , dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) Dunng construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed pnor to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site ~~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-04 SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP January 26, 2005 Page 10 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Thielmann Engineers, June 21, 2004, to reduce pollutants after construction entenng the stone drain system to the mawmum extent practical 6) Landscaping plans shall indude provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pestiGdes/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least 2 years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans forthese areas, inducting momtonng provisions for a minimum of 2 years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval pnor to the issuance of grading permits Noise 1) An acoustical sound wall will be regwred at a height of 6 feet for Lots 47,48, 49, 50, 51, and 52, 7 feet for Lot 54, and 8 feet for Lots 1 and 53, in order to reduce extenor noise levels to below 65 CNEL or below. The walls shall be constructed of approved materials and as specified in the Acoustical Analysis Wall heights greater than 8 feet shall requve approval of a vanance application • 2) Once building plans are available, an Acoustical Analysis shall be prepared to determine the building mitigation regwred to meet the 45 dBA CNEL intenor noise standard 3) The developer shall provide wntten notification to all home buyers that the I-15 Freeway/Base Lme Road interchange is planned to be reconstructed in a manner that would shift the southbound off ramp doser to the tract boundary 4) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, inducting Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or national holidays 5) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02.120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level momtonng as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Mondoring at other times may be regwred by the Building Official Said consultant will report their findings to the Bwlding Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant would immediately notify the Budding Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with city noise standards or halted 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution PLANNING COMMISSION RF=SOLUTION NO 05-04 SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP. January 26, 2005 Page 11 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF JANUARY 2005 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY• Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST• Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planrnng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duty and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of January 2005, by the following vote-to-wit AYES: COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS {~~~,r ~i City of Rancho Cucamonga . MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776 and Development Rewew DRC2004-00052 This Mitigation Monitonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration/Environmental Impact Report for the above-listed project This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded wdh the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project 2 A procedure of compliance and venfication has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who wdl take action, what action wdl be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance wdl be reported. 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible gwdelines. As monitonng progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance~of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department i Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing mondonng or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitonng Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who wdl take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance wdl be reported All monitonng and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the onginal authonty for proces$ing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address'. City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Ciwc Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~~ ~,C 9~ Mitigation Monitoring Program SUBTT16776 and DRC2004-00052 Page 2 3. Appropnate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropnate wntten approvals to the project planner. 4 The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is venfied for compliance, no further action is regwred for the speafic phase of development 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requmng no further monitonng will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Forrn 6. UnanUapated circumstances may anse requmng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planneror responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropnate design, construction, or operational personnel 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authonty to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authonty to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occumng. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authonty to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitonng after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred penod of time In those instances requiring long-term protect monitonng, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitonng the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitonng results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an indroidual qualified to knowwhether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitonng/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits ~,r~, c ~~ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project F[le No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776 and Development Review DRC2004-00052 Applicant: Dan Vaele Development Corp. Initial Study Prepared by: Vance Pomeroy Date: January 26.2005 -. ~. ~~V~,'Qual~ ` f The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO C Dunng A 4 stabilizmg agent (approved by South Coast Av Quality construction Management District (SCAQMD) and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, m accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Base Line Road shall be swept according to a schedule BO C Dunng A 4 established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions, in construction S accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C Dunng A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~a emissions construcbon from the site dunng such episodes Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C Dunng A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, developer CPBO C Review of plans C 2 shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equpment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the SCAQMD as well as City Planning Staff s r J ~8 • S • . -. .. All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'spec~cetions Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City ver~cetion All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans AIC 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAOMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAOMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAOMD BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Adddionally, contractors shall include the following provisions on grading plans and initiate on site or as soon as feasible• • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans AIC 2l4 through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibildy of large BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended penods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated sod during and after the end of work penods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City d silt is carried over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occOrs as a result of hauling __ Timing may vary depending upon time of year of --- construction. 2 of 8 r~ W (~ S .. .. . ~ ~. ~. .. Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i.e., BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction SCAOMD Rule 403 requirements ^ Maintain a mwmum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction swtable means Construction contractors shall utd¢e electric or clean BO C Rewew of plans AIC 4 alternative fuel powered equpment where feasible Construction contractors shall ensure thatconstruction- BO C Rewew of plans AIC Z4 grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use ~BJoI`ogic~a"'I~R~`esour~s^' ~ ~~~~~1. , 1 ~ ifRa vs .JeM1a\trA,a\S,aFap.-t ~~_ .R New eucalyptus tree windrows should be planted to CP B/C Dunng A 3 replace existing red gum eucalyptus trees in the manner construction speafied in the New W indrow Planting Guidelines within the Etiwanda Specific Plan The Blue Atlas Cedar shall be preserved through CP 8/C Dunng A 3 relocation supervised by a licensed arbonst. Said tree construction shall also receive proper treatment for wound at base of tree to protect against decay and disease Care shall be exerased by all mdmduals, developers, and contractors working near the tree to preserve and protect the tree in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, including, but not limited to, enclosing the tree with a protective chain link fence pnor to the issuance of any clearing and grubbing permd, grading permit, or budding permd Protective fencing shall remain in place dunng all phases of construction and shall not be removed without the wntten consent of the City Planner until construction is complete. ~$ `\ `~ V Cultural'R'esa~rces~F ;~~:~~'"~j B~rN' ~;~ ..,:G ~t,,,U htb~.. 4 n Yn> ~~'~ ``d, ;., - ` a% ` 3'" ,~ ,l ~~•, ,:4 >;ns~~+P,~:r~ ~F'r -~u14a6]nr~A,.-~hsa4.M " ' . *rc ' ~~~d"~~ ;. •r. 2' ;~~ r yq~~~ 'iTS. .c i~ 1 ~ N.a-c^. If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developerHnll retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require CP/BO C Review of report AID 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Review of report '~ 3/4 archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of report AID 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse proiect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the proiect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 4 of 8 ~ ~ , . .. Upon human remains encountered dunng CP C Dunng A 3/4 excavation associated with this protect, all work will construction halt and the County Coroner wdl be notified (Section 5097.98 of the Public Resource Code). The Coroner wdl deterrnme whether the remains are of forensic interest If the Coroner, with the aid of the supervising archaeologist, determines that the remains are prehistonc, the Native Amencan Heritage Commission will be contacted. This commission wdl contact the most likely descendant who will, within 24 hours, then make recommendations This may include the scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native Amencan burials A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction CP B Revew of report A/D 4 field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that wail also provide specific rewmmendations regarding further mdigation measures (i e , paleontological momtonng) that may be appropriate Where mitigation momtonng is appropnate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of report A~ 4 egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing actrvihes • Should fosstls be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of report AID 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the montor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Submit summary report to Cdy of Rancho CP D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens wdh a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum ~f 8 S C~ i ~ ... .... .. .. .. . . ~liydrologya d~atel~~Qc~I Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the permit BO B Plan Check C 2 applicant shall submit to Building Offiaal for approval, and Storrs Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction activities entenng the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical. An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included BO B Plan Check C 2 in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies speafic measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activties are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Speafy the timing of grading and construction to minimize sod exposure to rainy penods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remedia6on or restoration program within a speafied time frame Dunng construction, temporary berths such as BO B/C Dunng A 4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent construction discharge of debns or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff Dunng construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C Dunng A 4 cleaning will be performed pnor to storm events construction and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment --- --- from the site. 6of8 `~9.. f\ ~ , ~. ~. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified BO B/C Dunng A 4 in the W ater Quality Management Plan prepared by construction Thielmann Engineers, June 21, 2004, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B/C Dunng A 4 controlling and minimmng the use of construction fertilizers/pestiades/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits ,~:.6'N~'4'ti . ~. ,y . `% ^ ~ ~, i, e3v ' ;::{"; r;:. ti ,°•;= ~; ~i •3~k~'~ Nolse, i z ~~ ^' ~: ~a3. s `~», ^1 ;~a,~ ~~d ~,~. Kx c-~u=r ~fii ~:'< ~E~ ,~ ; '+~`t"w~'~"' ~ v ~: a s v '~ ~r: 'k~ ~'°~, ~a~'?='~'~-F ' °~, =m~,~~v"~~ T ~ , , ~ . .. , _ , .. p ,, ~: 5 = ; , . :.. ~ An acoustical sound wall will be requved at a height of 6 CP B/C Plan Check C 2 feet for Lots 47,48, 49, 50, 51, and 52, 7 feet for Lot 54, and 8 feet for Lots 1 and 53, in order to reduce exterior noise levels to 65 CNEL or below The walls shall be constructed of approved materials and as specified in the Acoustical Analysis Wall heights greater than 8 feet shall regwre approval of a variance application Once budding plans are available, an Acoustical CP B Plan Check C 2 Analysis shall be prepared to determine the budding mitigation regwred to meet the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard The developer shall provide written notification to all CP C,D Cert~cation of D 3 home buyers that the I-15 Freeway/Base Line Road Occupancy interchange is planned to be reconstructed in a manner that would shrft the southbound off ramp closer to the tract boundary Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C Dunng A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6.30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or national holidays ~f S i i i . . .... . . .. .. . . Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Budding Offical Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted \T~ Key to Checklist Abbreviations :~Resporisltile~P~ersori~ ~'" ,'~ _ , CDD -Community Development Director or designee ~IYlon _orlg9t~!g4f!g cY _ A -With Each New Development ~... a4Q. °§. µ A - On-site Inspection an ° t -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Pnor To COnsiNCtiOn B - Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permfl CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout ConsWCtion C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reporis/Studiesl Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 - Refain Depositor Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 - Revoke CUP 7 - CitaLOn 8of8 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16776 SUBJECT: 59 LOT SUBDIVISION OF 19 ACRES OF LAND APPLICANT: VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LOCATION: NORTH SIDE OF BASELINE ROAD, 1,200 FEET EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Comoletlon Date A. General Requirements 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its / /~ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the Ctty, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the Ctty, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such acbon but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776 is granted sub/ect to the approval of I / / Variance DRC2004-01002 B. Time Limits 1 This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning _/ /_ Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include' /_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and, grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Etiwanda Specific Pian 2 Pnor to any use of the protect site or business actively being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner SC-11-04 1 ~-~1 ~v~ Project NO SUBTT16778 Comoietion Dale 3 All sde, grading, landscape, vrigation, and street Improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 4 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable Clty Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit Issuance 5 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 6 Street names shall be submitted for Clty Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 7. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of bwlding permits. 8. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for communityconcems, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. D. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion ' control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 3 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area l -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft. of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall ,~ include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thrroing condition by the developer until each individual unit Is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 5 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the requred landscape plans and shall be subject to Clty Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Department SC-1-04 _~_J_ ~~_ _/~- ~~. ~~_ _/-/- ~~_ ~~_ ~~- -~-~- ~-~_ ~-r~, c° 10.E Project No suem sns Completion Date 6 Landscaping and irrigation systems requred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the ~_/_ perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer ~ 7 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the ~~ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department S. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of ~~_ Xenscape as defined m Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code 9 New windrow planting of Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) is required at a ratio of 50 linear ~~_ feet per acre. The size, spacing, staking, and irrigation of these trees shall comply with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance (RCMC 19 OS 100) E. Environmental 1 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the 210 and I-15 Freeways ~~_ m a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property 2 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the ~~_ issuance of bwldmg permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and rf appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The budding plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 3 The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of ~~_ the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards Certification shall be submitted to the Budding & Safety Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes 4. Mitigation measures are regwred for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of ~~_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $ 719 prior to the issuance of bwldmg permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions regwred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit I F. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location ~~ of mailboxes Mulb-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits G. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be m accordance with Calrfornia Bwldmg Code, City Grading ~ ~_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to ~~_ perform such work. SC-1-04 ~l~~~ /Q Protect No SUBTT76776 Completion Date 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Budding and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permds 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing bwldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: H. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public faalities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2 Dedication shall be made of the followtngrights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 60 total feet on Base Ltne Road 3 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 4 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be qwt-claimed or delineated on the final map 5. Adddional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs Street Improvements All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to Cary Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limned to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any bulding service egwpment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is requved unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements regwred by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one budding or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage oi, those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as regwred by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the bwldings or unds be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements regwred by these conditions of approval of development SC-1-04 _~_~- ~~- ~-~. ~~_ ~~- ~~_ ~~ ~~- ~~- ~~ ~~_ Protect No SU8TT18776 Comolehon Date 3 Construct the following perimeter street Improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC. Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Treil Median Island Bike Trail Other Base Line Road X X (c) X X X X Internal Streets X X X X X X Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. See the protect special conditions of approval. 4 Improvement Plans and Construction: a Street Improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street Improvements, poor to final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Cary Engineer's Office In addition to any other permits regwred c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and Interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d. Signal condut with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and Interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at Intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduct shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as speafied. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be Installed on all corners of Intersections per Clty Standards or as directed by the Clty Engineer. f Existing City roads requmng construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are regwred A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be Installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be Installed per City Standards In accordance with the Citys street tree program _~~- ~~- ~~- ~~_ ~~ ~~_ ~~- ~~. ~-~. ~~. ~~ SC-1-04 5 Project No SUBTT16778 Completion Date 6 Install street trees per City street tree design gwdelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line Item within the construction legend stating. °Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1).° Where public landscape plans are requved, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape Improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional Information, contact the Project Engineer Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Mln. Grow Spaee Spaeing Size Gty See Street Tree Reqwrement form -attached Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) Ail street trees are to be planted in accordance with Cary standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may regwre backfill sod amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commeraal or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required J. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed Into the Landscape Maintenance District Base Llne Road, from the west tract boundary to the east tract boundary 2. Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas ( % of mortaredcobble or other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces 3 A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Clty Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer This project shall be annexed into LMD No 9 and SLD Nos 1 and 8. 4 All regwred public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City 5 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan Base Line Road K. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of bulding permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as regwred by the Clty Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas SC-t-04 ~~- ~~ ~~- ~~- ~~ _l~- ~~- -/-/- ~~- 6 Project No SUBTT76776 Comdehon Date 3 Trees are prohibded within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured ~-J- from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk L. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, ~~_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as requred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. -J-/- 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the regwrements of the ~~_ Cucamonga Valley W ater Distract (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fue Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. ~~_ Approval of the final map will be subject to any regwrements that may be received from them M. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage ~~_ Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of-way: Sanbag ~~_ for connection(s) to regional trail. 3 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all ~~_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to bulding permit issuance if no map is involved 4 Priorto the issuance of bulding permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall ~~_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Dversion Program The deposit is fully refundable rf at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from ; landftlls, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to ~ the Engineering Department when the first building perind application is submtted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED I.~ SC-1-04 ,~;~ c ~a~ ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS September 20, 2004 Van Daele Development Corporation WO Baseline FJO Etiwanda SFR Tract DRC2004-00052 & SUBTT16776 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSG1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants. The following provides design gudelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a The maximum distance between fire hydrants insingle-family residential protects is 500-feet. No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet. b Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: 1. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways. 2. At intersections. 3. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. 4. As regwred by the Fire Safety Diwsion to meet operational needs of the Fre Distract ~ 5 A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any bwlding ' FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The required fire flow for this protect is 2000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radws of the proposed protect may be used to provide the regwred fire flow subfect to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adfacent property shall not be used to provide regwred fve flow. 3. Firewater plans are regwred for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 4 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600~feet of the proposed protect site. FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire District vehicle access and water supply from a public or private water main system before construction. ~~,C'~~9 FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal has approved your request for an alternate method #05844 (PMT2004-06120). The Homes and garages on lots 22-47 must be equipped with automatic fire Sprinklers in accordance to NFPA 13D. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems• The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the rewew and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radds of the project Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard #9-8 All regwred public fue hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 3. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers. All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2. AFS: Obtain a final for the Fire Sprinkler Systems in lots 22-47. 3. Public Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. 4. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be wsible from the street. When bwlding setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. 2 ~p~ llo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION i STREET TREE REQUIREMENT FORM LAST uaDATED s/s/oa _ DATE: 2-9-04 T0: RENE GUERRERO, ASSISTANT ENGINEER COMMENTS PREPARED BY: DAWN ROURK, LANDSCAPE CONSULTANT PROJECT: DRC2004-00052, SUBTT16776 LOCATION: N/S BASELINE AVE, E/0 ETIWANDA DESIGN NOTES: 1. STREET TREES ON NEW STREETS ARE TO BE SELECTED FROM THE CITY'S APPROVED STREET TREE LIST, BASED UPON AVAILABLE PLANTING AREA (TYPICALLY BETWEEN BACK-0FLURB AND THE SIDEWALK). ESTABLISHED STREETS SHOULD ALREADY HAVE DESIGNATED TREE SPECIES. CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISN)N, LANDSCAPE SECTION AT 909-477-2740 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 2. STREET TREES ARE TO BE SHOWN ON STREET OR OTHER PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS SIGNED BY 7HE CITY ENGINEER, AND CONSTRUCTED PER THE SAME. 3. STREET TREES SHOWN ON PLANNING DIVISION SUBMITTALS ARE CONCEPTUAL ONLY 4 INTERIOR STREETS WILL BE REQUIRED TO SELECT DECIDUOUS TREES FOR EAST-WEST STREETS AND EVERGREEN TREES FOR NORTHSOUTH STREETS FROM THE CITY'S APPROVED STREET TREE LIST WIND-PRONE AREAS MAYBE REQUIRED TO UTILIZE A MORE DECIDUOUS PALETTE. 5 INDICATED SPACINGS AND SIZES ARE REQUIREMENTS FOR CITY-MAINTAINED TREES ONLY. WHERE THE TREE CONCEPT GOES BEYOND AREAS OF INFLUENCE NEAR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR ANY CITY MAINTENANCE • EASEMENT, SPACINGS AND SIZES WILL BE PER THE ONSITE PLANS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DIVISION ONSITE AND OFFSITE PLANS SHALL BE COORDINATED 6. STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS SHALL REFLECT THE LEGEND AND NOTES INDICATED BELOW. IN SOME CASES, WHEN DETAILS ABOUT PARKWAY SIZES OR UTILITIES ARE UNAVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF CONDITIONING, OPTIONS ARE PROVIDED FOR VARIOUS SITUATIONS. IT IS THE DESIGNER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ASCERTAIN THE CONTEXT OF THE TREE PLANTING, SELECT THE APPROPRIATE TREE OPTION, AND OMIT ANY ERRONEOUS INFORMATION ON THE FINAL LEGEND. 7. STREET HNPROVEMENT PLANS SHALL REFLECT A LINE ITEM WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LEGEND TO STATE STREET TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE NOTES AND LEGEND ON SHEET 1 (TYPICALLY SHEET 1) i , _ ~ RC's , LIMA DR Ceras ocadentalls Western Redbud 3' 20' 0 C 15 GAL BASE LINE RD Ef0 HAVEN AVE FOREGROUND TREE Magnolia grandlflora NCN 8' 30' 0 C , 15 GAL PA B OR GREATER 'Samuel Sommer' TRANGULATED PA LESS THAN g OR Magnolia grandlflora'St NCN 3' 20' 0 C 15 GAL UNDER POWER LWES Maly' TRIANGULATED eACKGR0UN0 TREE Plnus a3nanensls Canary Island Plne 8' 25' 0 C 15 GAL PA 8' OR GREATER MIN INFORMAL, USE OCCASIONALLY EIEHIND MAGNOLIAS ACCENT TREE Llquldambar styraaflua NCN 8' 25' 0 C 15 GAL 'Festival' ROVIDE STREET SELECT APPROPRIATE TREE FROM THE APPROVED STREET TREE LIST FOR RANCHO NAME CUCAMONGA LIST EACH STREET AS A SEPARATE LINE ITEM WITHIN THIS LEGEND ~j ~, C /~/ . RESOLUTION NO 05-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00052, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SITE PLAN AND ELEVATIONS FOR 59 SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ON 19 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,200 FEET EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND THE RELATED TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2004-00701, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, AND 55 THRU 58 A Recitals 1. Van Daele Development Corporation filed an application for Development Review DRC2004-00052, the design review of Tract SUBTT16776, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subbed Design Review request is referred to as "the application " 2. On the 26th day of January 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application 3 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the fads set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced meeting on January 26, 2005, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at Base Line Road, 1,200 feet east of Efrvvanda Avenue vinth a street frontage of 706 feet and lot depth of approximately 1,350 feet and is presently improved with a plant nursery and office, and b The property to the north of the subbed site is vacant and former Pacific Elednc Railroad right-of-way, the property to the south consists of attached residential condominiums and single family residential, the property to the east issingle-family residential and freeway off ramp, and the property to the west is single-family residential and vacant, and c The development is proposed to include the development of one single-family residence on each lot except for the temporary installation of a detention basin for drainage control on four of the lots, and d All parking and circulation requirements are met. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-05 DRC200400052 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP January 26, 2005 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows a That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan, and b. That the proposed design is m accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d That the proposed design, together Huth the conditions applicable thereto, HnII not vhll be delnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally in~unous to properties or improvements rn the vicanity 4 Based upon the facts and information contained m the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togethervvith all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the applicatron, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows. a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared incompliance Hnth the California Environmental Quality Ad of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gurdelmes promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the mfortnation contained in said 'Mitigated Negative Declaration Hnth regard to the application b. Although the Mitigated Negative Decaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect which are listed below as conditions of approval c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed project vvill have potential for an adverse impact upon Hnldlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference /~' C° ~/~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-05 DRC200400052 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP. January 26, 2005 Page 3 Planning Department 1) The northerly penmeter of the temporary detention basin shall be improved in a manner similarly proposed for the front yards of the residences The basin shall be also improved with a wrought iron fence and landscaping 2) The sound wall shall be included in the improvement of the temporary detention basin lots 3) The applicant shall make a good faith effort to provide a trail access at " " C the end of the most northeasterly cul-de-sac (also known as Street and Acom Place), rf feasible, to overcome grade differential with the future regional trail to the north 4) The sound walls delineated m the acoustical analysis must be provided on all lots to be improved, rncluding those lots that will contain the temporary detention basin Provide details rn the plan and the elevation of the vanous sound walls 5) The project boundary penmeterwalls shall be constructed in a manner to match the penmeter walls on the south side of Base Lme Road with nver rock pilasters and slump stone cap 6) The developer shall provide wntten notification, in a format approved by the City Planner, to all home buyers that the I-15 Freeway/Base Lme Road interchange is planned to be reconstructed in a manner that would shift the southbound I-15 Freeway off ramp and create a new "cloverleaf" on ramp Goser to the tract boundary. 7) Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701 rs hereby approved, except that the Blue Atlas Cedar shall be preserved through relocation, subfect to the environmental mitigations for replacement planting as contained in this Resolution 8) No pemtit or fuRher approval for this protect shall be forthcoming hereafter until the building now situated over the westerly protect boundary (across the property tine) in the vicinity of the profect's proposed Lot 1 rs removed in accordance with the California Building Code and to the satisfaction of the Building Official Engineenng Department 1) Base Lme Road frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Divided Artenal" standards including, but not limited to, the follovnng a) Right-of-way shall be 60 feet measured from street centerline along entire project frontage PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-05 DRC200400052 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP January 26, 2005 Page 4 b) Provide curb, gutter, 5-foot wide curvilinear sidewalk, and asphalt pavement, as regwred c) Prowde landscaped median on Base Line Road along entire protect frontage with no openings Existing median in Base Line Road to be protected and reconstructed, as needed d) Prowde 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights along Base Line Road frontage e) Prowde a Class II Bike Lane along protect frontage f) Provide traffic signage, stnping, and R26 "No Stopping" signs, or replace, as regwred g) Provide a westbound nght tum/deceleration lane for traffic entenng subdivision 2) Internal streets to be improved in accordance with City "Local Residential" standards including, but not limited to, the following. a) Provide curb and gutter and property line-adtacent sidewalk, as regwred b) Prowde 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlights, as regwred c) Provide traffic stnping and signage, as regwred 3) Construct Etiwanda/San Sevaine Intenm Master Basin No 5B as follows, tustified by a final drainage report approved by the City Engineer a) Provide an ultimate design for the basin to serve the entire developed tnbutary area south of the future regional trail and east of Etrvvanda Avenue b) Install suffiGent capacity to mitigate the increased runoff from this development nnth an outlet system capable of handling the ultimate basin design (entve tnbutary area) vnth a minimum amount of modification as incremental development occurs c) An assessment distnct shall be formed for maintenance of the detention basin or a maintenance agreement shall be executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing pnvate maintenance of the faality but providing the City vnth the nght of access to maintain the facility ~f pnvate maintenance is insuffiGent and allowing the City to assess those costs to the developer Said agreement shall include a cash deposit as secunty for any maintenance costs the City may incur Said agreement shall be recorded to run with the property PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-OS DRC200400052 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP January 26, 2005 Page 5 d) The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the proportionate cost of the land and ultimate basin related faal~ties (outlet, etc) from future development using the basin If the developer fails to submit said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all nghts of the developerto reimbursement shall terminate. 4) Install local storm drains to convey development drainage to the Intenm Master Basin No 5B onsite. Extend the local stone dram system as far on site as needed to contain 025 within tops of curbs, 0100 vnthm nghts-of-way, and provde a 10-foot dry lane m 010. The cost of local stone drams shall be borne by this development with no fee credit Design local storm drams for ultimate connection to the existing MPSD m Base Lme Road. a) Final drainage study shall address whether the lateral in Lot 31, talung undeveloped runoff from the north side of the future regional trail, is still needed or if it can be replaced with a facility taking trail runoff only to Street "E " This will also affect Intenm basin sizing and whether any of the off-site flows, should be directed to existing Basin SA b) Where storm drains are available, provide catch basins m lieu of cross gutters c) Both catch basins and laterals at west end of Street "D" shall intercept 0100 Final drainage study shall address both the Intenm (proposed) and ultimate (Street "D" extended to west) development conditions 5) Lots containing the mtenm basin shall be encumbered by a temporary public drainage easement 6) Connection to future PaGfic Electnc Inland Empire Trail through the Street "E" cul-de-sac shall be a sidewalk easement equally split between Lots 31 and 32 (properly line in middle of sidewalk) 7) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electncal, except for the 66 kV electncal) on the protect side of Base Lme Road shall be undergrounded along the entire protect frontage, extending to the first pole off site (east and west), pnor to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first All services crossing Base Line Road shall be undergrounded at the same time The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergroundmg from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all nghts of the developerto reimbursement shall terminate ~i ~ ~ l/lo PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-05 DRC2004-00052 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP January 26, 2005 Page 6 8) If the existing ovefiead utilities along the west protect boundary serve any of the Not-A-Part parcels to the west, then perform undergrounding and provde a public utility easement along the proled boundary If not, then remove the overhead utilities. 9) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to 1 foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages. 10) Prowde a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and identify applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the Grading Plan 11) Maintenance of BMPs identified in the WQMP shall be addressed in the protect CC&Rs Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agents (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct [SCAQMD] and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Base Line Road shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions assoaated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when v~nnd speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions 5) Pnorto the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that there use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distnd (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff 6) All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The construction contractors shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained per manufacturers' speafications. ~/?~C ll~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-05 DRC2004-00052 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP • January 26,2005 Page 7 Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication. ~ All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed perfonnance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray 8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1108 9) All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions on Grading Plans and irntiate on srte when appropnate or as soon as feasible Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time • Schedule actrvitres to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil dunng and after the end of work penods. • Dispose of surplus excavated matenal m accordance with local ordinances and use sound engmeenng practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt rs tamed over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of yearof construction • Suspend grading operations dunng high winds p e ,vend speeds exceeding 25 mph) m accordance ninth SCAQMD Rule 403 regwrements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means 10) Construction contractors shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel powered egwpment where feasible. 11) Construction contractors shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use Bro/ogica/ Resources 1) New eucalyptus tree windrows should be planted to 2place ewsting red gum eucalyptus trees m the manner speGfied m the New Windrow Planting Guidelines within the Etiwanda Specific Plan ~i~,Cll~' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-05 DRC200400052 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP January 26, 2005 Page 8 2) The Blue Atlas Cedar shall be preserved through relocation supervised by a licensed arbonst Said tree shall also receive proper treatment for wound at base of tree to protect against decay and disease Care shall be exerGSed by all individuals, developers, and contractors working near the tree to preserve and protect the tree in accordance Hnth Rancho Cucamonga MuniGpal Code Section 19 08 110, inGuding, but not limited to, enclosing the tree with a protective chain link fence poor to the issuance of any cteanng and grubbing permit, grading permit, or budding permit Protective fenGng shall remain in place during all phases of construction and shall not be removed without the wntten consent of the City Planner until construction is complete Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistonc archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropnate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will Enact intenm measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or srgnificant modification ~nnthout an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sites mnthin new developments, using theirspeGal qualities as a theme or focal point Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological hentage Propose mitigation measures and recommend considerations of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, follovnng appropnate CEQA gwdelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources wnthin the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report vmth onginal illustrations, to the San Bemardmo County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) Upon human remains encountered dunng excavation assocated wnth~ this protect, all work will halt and the County Coroner will be notified (Section 5097 98 of the Public Resource Code) The Coroner will determine whether the remains are of forensic interest If the Coroner, vinth the aid of the supervising archaeologist, determines that the remains are prehistonc, the Native Amencan Hentage Commission well be contacted Thrs commission will contact the most likely descendant who will, v~nthin 24 hours, then make recommendations This may inGude the scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated withf~Native Amencan bunals PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-05 DRC2004-00052 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP. • January 26, 2005 Page 9 3) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the pro/ect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being Geared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately desert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Offiaal for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying BMPs that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the stone drain system to the maximum extent practical 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented forthe proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minim¢e soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be con'ected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to stone events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site • 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the WaterQuality Management Plan prepared by Thielmann Engineers, June 21, 2004, to ~~ f,~, C' /~U PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-OS DRC2004-00052 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP January 26, 2005 Page 10 reduce pollutants after construction entenng the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, inctuding monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits Noise 1) An acoustical sound wall will be required at a height of 6 feet for Lots 47,48, 49, 50, 51, and 52, 7 feet for Lot 54, and 8 feet for Lots 1 and 53, in order to reduce exterior noise levels to 65 CNEL or below The walls shall be constructed of approved matenals and as specified in the Acoustical Analysis Wall heights greater than 8 feet shall require approval of a vanance application 2) Once building plans are available, an Acoustical Analysis shall be prepared to determine the building mitigation regwred to meet the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard . 3) The developer shall provide wntten notification to all home buyers that the I-15 Freeway/Base Line Road interchange is planned to be reconstructed in a manner that would shift the southbound off ramp closer to the tract boundary 4) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or national holidays 5) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitonng at other trines may be required by the Budding Official Said consultant well report their findings to the Building Official vinthin 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant would immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with City noise standards or halted 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF JANUARY 2005 . PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~pf ~ i~-~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-05 DRC2004-00052 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP. January 26, 2005 Page 11 BY• Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of January 2005, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT- COMMISSIONERS. • ~~ iaa City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776 and Development Review DRC2004-00052 This Mitigation Monitonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration/Environmental Impact Report for the above-listed project This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements. 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2. A procedure of compliance and venfication has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out cofrectly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covenng all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitonng Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the onginal authonty for processing the protect. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address' City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Dnve • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Mitigation Monitoring Program SUBTT16776 and DRC2004-00052 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitorspecific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department wdl approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requinng no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planneror responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Forn. 6. Unantiapated circumstances may arise regwnng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form wdl be completed by the protect planneror responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, consUuction, or operational personnel 7. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of constivction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng after written notification has been issued. The protect planneror responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occumng The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These;funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff dine to monitor andireport on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time 9. In those instances regwnng long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of bwlding permits. ~j ~~ ~ ~~ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project F[le No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16T76 and Development Review DRC2004-00052 Applicant: Dan Vaele Development Corp. Initial Study Prepared by: Vance Pomeroy Date: January 26.2005 •. ~ ~. ~,,.~; b /~ d r t~Vay 1 The site shall be treated with water or other sod- BO C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by South Coast Air Quality construction Management District (SCAQMD) and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Base Line Road shall be swept according to a schedule BO C During A 4 established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions, in construction accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction from the site during such episodes Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer CP/BO C Review of plans C 2 shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the SCAQMD as well as Cdy Planning Staff ~$ n~ ~.J All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans AIC 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specrfications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Rewew of plans AIC 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAOMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertorinance standards BO B Rewew of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAOMD Rule 1108 All construction equpment shall comply with SCAOMD BO C Rewew of plans AIC 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions on grading plans and initiate on site or as soon as feasible • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Rewew of plans AIC 2/4 through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Rewew of plans AIC 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule actrvdies to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 exposed excavated sod during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 - accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to ad/scent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 2of8 ~~ ~\ J • Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i e , BO C Dunng A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction SCAOMD Rule 403 requvements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods BO C Dunng A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction swtable means Construction contractors shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans AIC 4 alternative fuel powered egwpment where feasible. Construction contractors shall ensure thatconstruction- BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use `"~k~logit~l':Resourc New eucalyptus tree windrows should be planted to CP B/C Dunng A 3 replace existing red gum eucalyptus Vees in the manner construction ' specified in the New W indrow Planting Guidelines within the Etiwanda Specific Plan The Blue Atlas Cedar shall be preserved through CP B/C Dunng A 3 relocation supervised by a licensed arborist Said tree construction shall also receive proper treatment for wound at base of tree to protect against decay and disease Care shall be exercised by all indiwduals, developers, and conVactors working near the tree to preserve and protect the tree in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Muniapal Code Section 19 OS 110, including, but not limited to, enclosing the tree with a protective chain link fence prior to the issuance of any clearing and grubbing permd, grading permd, or budding permit Protective fencing shall remain in place dunng all phases of construction and shall not be removed without the written consent of the City Planner until construction is complete ~$ p~ L~.J i ! .... . . .. ... .. . . iw~,. Rx, "`^I4, ~ "sY.S v., va;.~.} Yq tM1~" t .CulturaliRe~ources~~N7~,,z,~.~ .~ ~ iti ofr 'i it `. ~;$ °' "FPu F °. ,~. ~~'~' f~ ~, t aM _ - _ , v. ,: i `" ~ . •~, v r a {ti" .~'~ to ra 1' N tit. of E;h~~° '" ',~ If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer rnll retain a qual~ed archaeologist to mondor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wdl. • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CP/BO C Review of report AID 3/4 sites from demolition or signrficant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require CP/BO C Review of report AID 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of report AID 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report AID 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the prolect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 4of8 _~ ~~ N ~. Upon human remains encountered during CP C During A 3/4 excavation associated with this project, all work will construction halt and the County Coroner will be notified (Section 5097.98 of the Public Resource Code) The Coroner will determine whether the remains are of forensic interest If the Coroner, with the aid i of the supervising archaeologist, deterrmnes that the remains are prehistoric, the Native American Heritage Commission will be contacted. This commission will contact the most likely descendant who will, within 24 hours, then make recommendations. This may include the saentific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruchon CP B Review of report A/D 4 field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigaton measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation mondonng is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological morntor, trained and CP B Revew of report A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found vnthin an area being deared BO B/C Review of report Aro 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D Revew of report D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum ~8 - ~~~s.. W ~ . .. ~Hy!drolo~4i8 iV~"`ac ~Qi~lljt - s " ' -_ ,~ Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the permit BO B Plan Check ~ 2 applicant shall submit to Building Offiaal for approval, and Storrs Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction activities entenng the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included BO B Plan Check ~ 2 in grading plan, and implemented forthe proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy penods expenenced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediaUon or restoration programwithin a speafied time frame During construction, temporary berms such as BO BIC During A 4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent consWdion discharge of debns or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. Dunng construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C During A 4 cleaning will be performed pnor to store events construction and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site 6of8 .~ ~. .. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified BO B/C Dunng A 4 rn the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by construction Thielmann Engineers, June 21, 2004, to reduce pollutants after construction entenng the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B/C Dunng A 4 controlling and minimizing the use of construction ferttlizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval pnor to the issuance of grading permits An acoustical sound wall wdl be required at a height of 6 CP B/C Plan Check C 2 feet for Lots 47,48, 49, 50, 51, and 52, 7 feet for Lot 54, and 8 feet for Lots 1 and 53, in order to reduce exterior noise levels to 65 CNEL or below The walls shall be constructed of approved materials and as speafied in the Acoustical Analysis Wall heights greater than 8 feet shall regwre approval of a variance application Once building plans are available, an Acoustical CP B Plan Check C 2 Analysis shall be prepared to determine the building mitigation regwred to meet the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard. The developer shall provide wntten notrfication to all CP C,D Certfication of D 3 home buyers that the I-15 FreewaylBase Line Road Occupancy interchange is planned to be reconstructed in a manner that would shift the southbound off ramp closer to the tract boundary Construction or grading shall not take place between the -BO__. C Dunng A 4 hours of 8 00 p.m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction inGudrng Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or national holidays. s ~8 ~ CJ ' , .. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards specrfied in Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level momtonng as specked in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Budding Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Offical vnthin 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction actiwties shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted ~.l'-' r\ W Key to Checklist Abbreviations 8of8 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2004-00052 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT OF 59 SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES APPLICANT: VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LOCATION: NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, 1,200 FEET EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Comole6on Date A. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, tts agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the altematrve, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the Cdy, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this conddion j 2 Approval of Design Revew DRC2004-00052 is granted subject to the approval of Tentative Tract ~ _/_/_ Map SUBTT16776 and Varance DRC2004-01002 3 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 05-05, Standard / /_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading actiwties and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if / /_ budding permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the datq of approval No extensions are allowed ' SC-11-04 1 • ~i~~ e I.3~ Project No DRC2004-00052 Completion Date C. Site Development lans which include roved w th the a d t d d 1 p i pp in accor ance main aine The site shall be developed an site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3- Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fve Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The bwtdings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised sde plans and bwldmg elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shalt be submitted for City Planner rewew and approval prior to the issuance of bwldmg permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, vngation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance wrth ail sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance- ? If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public wew 8 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner Forsingle- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 9 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 10 All bwldmg numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and conase manner, including proper illumination 11 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer rewew and approved prior to the issuance of bwldmg permits 12 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice regwrements, special street posting, phone lishng for community concerns, hours of constructOn activity, dust control measures, and security fencing 13 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adtoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the protect's perimeter -/-/- ~~ ~~- ~~. ~~- ~~- _/~_ ~~- I ~~_ I ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~_ SC-1-04 Project No pRC2004-00052 Comole6on Dete D. E. F. 14 Construct block walls between homes (i.e ,along interior side and rear property Imes), rather than .J_J wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency ~ 15 Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood ~~ gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC 16 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. ~-1- 17 For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each _J~- support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two Yz-mch lag bolts, to withstand high words Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade 18 Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant. ~~- 19 On comer side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk The _l~- 5-foot walUfence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and vrigation plans shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance regwrement, m a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 20 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured ~-J- products Bui lding Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted egwpment and/or ~~ protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and ~ streets as requred by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the bwlding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Crty Planner Details shall be included in building plans Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street ~~- Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _J~- the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior , final map approval m the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5.1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _J~- slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy SG7-04 ~i ~~ C /3~ Protect No DRC2004-00052 3 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq tt. of slope area l -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent vrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and urigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condtion by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 5. Front yard and comer side yard landscaping and vrigation shall be regwred per the Development Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the regwred street trees and slope planting 6. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the regwred landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Department. 7. Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 8 All walls shall be provided with decoratroe treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department 9. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xenscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Muniapal Code 10 New windrow planting of Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) is regwred at a ratio of 50 linear feet per acre The size, spacing, staking, and irrigation of these trees shall comply with the Citys Tree Preservation Ordinance (RCMC 19.08 100). G. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval Anysigns proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs H. Environmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the 210 and I-15 Freeways in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property ~~ 2 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The bulding plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report 3 The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards Certification shall be submitted to the Budding & Safety Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected . homes. SG7-04 Comoietion Date ~~- ~~. ~J- ~~- ~~. ~~ ~~ ~~- ~~ ~~- ~J- ~~_ Protect No DRC2004-00052 Comoletlon Dete 4. Mitigation measures are regwred for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/- implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Cary Planner in the amount of $ 719 poor to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions regwred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit I. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/~- of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to Ciry Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) J. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following• ~-~- a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, ' d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air I conditioning; and g Planning Department Protect Number (i e , DRC2004-00052) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report ~-J- Architect's/Engineer's stamp and °wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to ~J- the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. -J-J- 5 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) cans ~J- contact the Bwlding and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements K. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be ~J~ marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2004-00052). The applicant shall comply with the SC-1-04 5 Prgect No DRC2004-00052 Completion Data latest adopted Calrfornia Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Bulding and Safety Department for • availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2. Pnor to issuance of bulding permits for a new residential prolect or major addition, the applicant ~~_ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and tees and School Fees. Applicant shall prowde a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bulding and Safety Offical after tract/parcel map ~~_ recordation and prior to issuance of bwlding permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday ~~_ through Saturday, with no construcbon on Sunday or holidays L. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Bulding Code (CBC) for property Ime clearances ~~_ considenng use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Bulding Code for required occupancy separations. ~~_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's °high wind' instructions ~~- M. Exi sting Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for the property line clearances ~~_ considering use, area, and fve-resistiveness of existing buildings 2. Due to the scope of the prolect, an Occupancy Change review is requred Submit plans to the ~~_ Bwlding and Safety Department to determine compliance for the proposed use 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and/or capped to comply with the ~~_ California Bulding and Plumbing Codes 4 Underground on-site utilities are to be located and shown on bulding plans submitted for budding j ~~_ permit application 5 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional regwrements may be regwred. ~_I- 6 Obtain demolition permit for the removal of existing structures ~-/- N. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with Calrfom~a Bulding Code, City Grading ~-J- Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California toy _/~_ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the ~~_ time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, ~~_ submitted, and approved by the Bulding and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits SC-1-04 ~6~ c ~3~ Protect No DRC2004-00052 Comoleeon Date 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction protects and for ~~ existing buildings where tmprovements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California . registered Ciwl Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, ~~_ community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from ~~- street centerline) 60 total feet on Base Line Road ~~- 3. Comer property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per Ctty Standards ~~- 4. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be qwt-claimed or delineated on the ~~_ final map 5 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to prowde a minimum of 7 ~~ feet measured from the face of curbs t I mprovemen s P. Street 1 All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped ~~- areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street tmprovements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, dine approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2 Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source ~~ of energy, fuel or power to any bwldtng service egwpment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is regwred unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all tmprovements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the Ctty Council, except that in developments containing more than one bwldtng or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as regwred by conditions of approval of development. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements regwred by these conditions of approval of development i SC-1-04 7 ~~, ~° /39 Prgect No DRC200400052 Comolet~on Date 3 Construct the following perimeter street improvements Including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC. Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Base Line Road X X (c) X X X X Internal Streets X X X X X X Notes (a) Median Island includes landscaping and vrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays well be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this dem See the protect special conditions of approval 4. Improvement Plans and Construction• a Street Improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the Cary Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permd shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Cary Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes. 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. i g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check 5 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program • SC-1-04 ~~ ~ ~~~ _~-J- ~~ ~~_ ~~ ~~- ~~- ~~ -/.~_ _/~- ~~. Project No DRC2004-00052 Completion Date Install street trees per City street tree design gwdelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1).° Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Spaee Spacing Size ~. See street tree regwrement form -attached Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may regwre backfill soil amendments, as determined by the Cary inspector 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including drveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as requred Q. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A separate set of landscape and vrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: Base Line Road, from the west tract boundary to the east tract boundary 2 Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble or other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces 3 A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of bwlding permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer This protect shall be annexed into LMD No. 9 and SLD Nos 1 and 8 4 All regwred public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City 5. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan Base Line Road R. Drainage and Flood Control ' 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first Ail drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adtacent areas SC-1-04 _~_f ~~ ~~~ ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~. ~~~ 9 ~/ ~~ ~ /~/ Protect No DRC2004-00052 3 Trees are prohibited wtthtn 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public stone drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk • S. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the regwrements of the Cucamonga Valley W ater District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is requved prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water distract within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final map will be subtect to any regwrements that may be received from them T. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved 2 Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of-way. Sandbag for connection(s) to regional trail 3 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs far all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to bwldmg permit issuance if no map is involved 4. Prior to the issuance of bwldmg permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the Cary Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first bwldmg permit application is submitted to Bwlding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ,~ CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SC-1-04 "~ a1 ~f ~/~oL /~~ Completion Date _J~_ ~~- ~~- ~~_ ~~_ ~~_ ~~_ ~~- ~~_ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION TREE REQUIREMENT FORM LAST UPDATED 6/3/03 DATE: 2-9-04 T0: COMMENTS PREPARED BY: RENE GUERRERO. ASSISTANT ENGINEER DAWN RDURK. LANDSCAPE CONSULTANT PROJECT: DRC200400052, SUBTT16776 LOCATION: N/S BASELINE AVE, E/0 ETIWANDA DESIGN NOTES• 1. STREET TREES ON NEW STREETS ARE TO BE SELECTED FROM THE CITY'S APPROVED STREETTREE UST, BASED UPON AVAILABLE PLANTING AREA (TYPICALLY BETWEEN BACK-0F-CURB AND THE SIDEWALK). ESTABLISHED STREETS SHOULD ALREADY HAVE DESIGNATED TREE SPECIES. CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, LANDSCAPE SECTION AT 909-477-2740 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 2. STREET TREES ARE TO BE SHOWN ON STREET OR OTHER PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS SIGNED BYTHE CITY ENGINEER, AND CONSTRUCTED PER THE SAME. 3. STREET TREES SHOWN ON PLANNING DIVISION SUBMITTALS ARE CONCEPTUAL ONLY 4. INTERIOR STREETS WILL BE REQUIRED TO SELECT DECIDUOUS TREES FOR EAST-WEST STREETS AND EVERGREEN TREES FOR NORTHSOUTH STREETS FROM THE CITY'S APPROVED STREET TREE UST. WIND-PRONE AREAS MAY BE REQUIRED TO UTILIZE A MORE DECIDUOUS PALETTE. 5. INDICATED SPACINGS AND SIZES ARE REQUIREMENTS FOR CITY-MAINTAINED TREES ONLY. WHERE THE TREE CONCEPT GOES BEYOND AREAS OF INFLUENCE NEAR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR ANY CITY MAINTENANCE EASEMENT, SPACINGS AND SIZES WILL BE PER THE ONSITE PLANS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DIVISION. O~ AND OFFSITE PLANS SHALL BE COORDINATED 6. STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS SHALL REFLECT THE LEGEND AND NOTES INDICATED BELOW. IN SOME CASES, WHEN DETAILS ABOUT PARKWAY SIZES OR UTILfiIES ARE UNAVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF CONDITIONING, OPTIONS ARE PROVIDED FOR VARIOUS SITUATIONS IT IS THE DESIGNER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ASCERTAIN THE CONTEXT OF THE TREE PLANTING, SELECTTHE APPROPRIATE TREE OPTION, AND OMITANY ERRONEOUS INFORMATION ON THE FINAL LEGEND 7. STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS SHALL REFLECT A LINE ITEM WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LEGEND TO~STATE: STREET TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE NOTES AND LEGEND ON SHEET Z (TYPICALLY SHE~T 1) _ ~ LIMA DR Ceras occidentalis Western Redbud~ 3' 20' 0 C 15 GAL BASE LINE RD E/O HAVEN AVE FOREGROUND TREE Magnolia grandiflora NCN 8' 30' 0 C , 15 GAL PA g OR GREATER 'Samuel Sommer TRIANGULATED PA LESS THAN d GR Magnolia grandlflora'SL NCN 3' 20' 0 C 15 GAL UNDER POWER LWES Mari TRIANGULATED i BACKGROUND TREE Pmus cananensis Canary Island Pine 8' 25' 0 C 15 GAL PA 8' OR GREATER MIN INFORMAL. USE OCCASIONALLY BEHIND MAGNOLIAS 'CCENT TREE Uquidambar styrac~flua NCN 8' 25' 0 C 15 GAL LIST EACH STREET AS A SEPARATE LINE ITEM ~'/,t3~ Cy ~~.3 ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS September 20, 2004 Van Daele Development Corporation N/O Baseline FJO Etiwanda SFR Tract DRC2004-00052 & SUBTT16776 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design gwdelines for the spaang and location of fire hydrants. a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants insingle-family residential protects is 500-feet. No portion of the exterior wall faang the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet. b. Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: 1 At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways. 2 At intersections. 3. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. 4. As regwred by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of thq Fire Distract. 5. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any bwlding ~ FSG2 Fire Flow 1. The regwred fire flow for this protect is 2000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radws of the proposed protect may be used to provide the regwred fire flow subtect to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide regwred fire flow. 3 Firewater plans are requued for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 4 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600~feet of the proposed protect site FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes regwre approved Fire District vehicle access and water supply from a public or private water main system before construction. ~Ui C ~~"~ FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal has approved your request for an alternate method #05844 (PMT2004-06120). The Homes and garages on lots 22-47 must be equipped with automatic fire Sprinklers in accordance to NFPA 13D. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the rewew and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard #9-8 Ali regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delrvenng any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6° above the finished surface of the road. 3. Flre Flow• A current fire flow letter from CCWD must-be-receroed. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, °Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers°. On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2. AFS: Obtain a final for the Fire Sprinkler Systems in lots 22-47. 3. Public Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services 4. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When bwlding setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. ~,~,c i~ RESOLUTION NO 05-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2004-01002 FOR WALL HEIGHTS EXCEEDING 8 FEET FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16776, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,200 FEET EAST OF ETIWANDAAVENUE IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, AND 55 THRU 58 A. Recitals 1. Van Daele Development Corporation filed an application for the issuance of Vanance DRC2004-01002 as described in the title of this Resolution in contunction with their applications for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776 and Design Review DRC2004-00052. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Vanance request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 26th day of January 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows• 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public heanng on January 26, 2005, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows. a. The application applies to property located at Base Line Road, a mayor divided artenal sVeet, 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue with a street frontage of 706 feet and lot depth of approximately 1,350 feet and is presently improved with a plant nursery and office, and b. The property to the east of the southern portion of the site is vacant. The I-15 Freeway off-ramp is approximately 200 feet to the east and the I-15 Freeway travel lanes are approximately 500 feet to the east, and c. The proposed project would include the development of 59 single-family detached residences; and d. The acoustical analysis (Gordon Bncken & Associates, March 2004) prepared forthe protect determined that noise levels exceed City, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and Caltrans noise limits; and therefore, recommended sound attenuations bamers such as block walls e. Vanances have been granted for sound wall heights for all other residential protects along the I-15 Freeway [~ /! /~ /~~ /J/ ` /~i^' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-06 DRC2004-01002 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP January 26, 2005 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a. That stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result m practical difriculty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code b. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same d~stnct. c. That sthct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges entoyed by the owners of other properties in the same distract. d. That the granting of the Vanance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same distract. e. That the granting of the Vanance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally injurious to properties or improvements m the vicinity 4. Based upon the facts and infortnaUon contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all wntten and oral reports included forthe environmental assessmentfor the application, the Plamm~g Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Decaraton and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows. a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guid'ehnes promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Plamm~g Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said 'Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect which are listed below as conditions of approval. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Plamm~g Commission finds as follows. In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Plamm~g Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-06 DRC2004-01002 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP. January 26, 2005 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. i 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF JANUARY 2005. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY' Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of January 2005, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES. COMMISSIONERS. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS. ~rb~ C lS~~ RESOLUTION NO 05-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2004 01002 FOR WALL HEIGHTS EXCEEDING 8 FEET FORTENTATIVETRACT MAP SUBTT16776, LOCATED on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue IN THE Low-Medwm Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, AND 55 THRU 58 A Recitals 1. Van Daele Development Corporation filed an application for the issuance of Variance DRC200401002 as described in the title of this Resolution in contunction with their applications for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776 and Design Review DRC200400052. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 26th day of January 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 26, 2005, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows. a The application applies to property located at Base Line Road, a majordivided arterial street, 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue with a street frontage of 706 feet and lot depth of approwmately 1,350 feet and is presently improved with a plant nursery and office; and b The property to the east of the southern portion of the site is vacant. The I-15 Freeway off-temp is approwmately 200 feet to the east and the I-15 Freeway travel lanes are approximately 500 feet to the east, and c. The proposed protect would include the development of 59 single-family detached residences, and d The acoustical analysis (Gordon Bncken & Associates, March 2004) prepared forthe project determined that noise levels exceed Crty Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and Calirans Horse limits, and therefore, recommended sound attenuations bamers such as block walls • e Variances have been granted for sound wall heights for all other residential protects ' along the I-15 Freeway ~~~ C ~ ~9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-06 DRC2004-01002 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP. January 26, 2005 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public hearing and upon the speafic findmgs of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the speufied regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship mconsistentwiththe objectives of the Development Code. b. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties m the same district. c That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the speafied regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges entoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. d That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified m the same district. e That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project vnll have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findmgs as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Ad of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said 'Mitigated Negative Decaration with regard to the application b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mtigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Decaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(~1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. ~/~ % C- ~.dr/ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-06 DRC200401002 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP . January 26, 2005 Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below. 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Gty, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the altematrve, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, oremployees, forany Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF JANUARY 2005. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Macias, Chavman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cetrfy that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commissron held on the 26th day of January 2005, by the following vote-to-wit AYES: COMMISSIONERS• NOES• COMMISSIONERS. " ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~"/~~C /~ Jan z6 05 U2:~Up Sims free apecrairsL aua cam ~~ci p.i Sims Tree ~fealth 6111 Appaloosa Avenue, Van Daele Development Corp. 2900 Adams Street, Ste. C-25 Riverside, CA 92504 Attn: Michael Van Daele January 26, 2005 Re: CZaCZStS CA 92509, (9SI) 685-6662 ~f'a~ (9S1) 685-2267 The Blue Atlas Cedar tree on the eighteen acre Fritz properly site in the Euwanda area of San Bernardino County, California. Arborist opinion: The Blue Atlas Cedar, Cedrus atlantica, which is not a native tree, located in front of the nursery office was hit by a vehicle as noted in the report dated March 31 2004. This injury resulted in a large chunk of bazk and cambium being tom out of the side of the tree. This damage while not immediately life-threatening will shorten the tree's useful life and ability to recover from stress. This azborist believes that there is little to no long term environmental value to the developer in relocating this tree. The damage may also subject homeowners to possible future failure hazard from this tree. The nursery owners were contemplating relocating this tree. While relocation may be possible, the nursery owners would be relocating purely for sentimental reasons. Van Daele welcomes the nursery owners to relocate this tree off site at the nursery's expense if they desire. Sincerely, ~^n ~ ~ ^ Susan M Sims Agricultural Biologist Certified Urban Forester LS.A. Certified Arborist #WE-0286A California Agricultural Adviser #1096 California Agricultural Applicator # 31179 1 eCnpyrigA[ Suns Trec Hea1N $pec~al Ws 2004 ./, /3. ~ Staff Report DATE January 26, 2005 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY• Mike Smith, Assistant Planner SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00404 - HOGLE-IRELAND, INC - A request to construct a commercal building of 8,350 square feet for a retail use, a dental office, and a restaurant in the Industrial Park District, Subarea 7, located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Mayten Street - APN 0229-011-84 Related Files. Development Review Modification DRCDR99-11 MOD and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15630 Staff has found the protect to be within the scope of a previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program adopted by the Planning Commission on April 28, 1999, and June 28, 2000, respectively, and a Negative Declaration adopted by the Planning Commission on February 13, 2002 This protect does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the previous Negative Declarations. BACKGROUND• The site is part of the 140-acre master planned Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park that was conceptually approved by the Planning Commission on April 28, 1999 (related file DR 99-11) The original master plan was to have been comprised of office, industrial, research, and development uses In February of 2002, 25 acres at the northeast quadrant of this master plan were subdivided into 11 parcels through the approval of Parcel Map 15630 The proposed bwlding wdl be located on Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 15630. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning. North - Vacant, Community Commercial (CC) District, Terra Vista Community Plan South - Vacant, Industrial Park (IP) District, Subarea 7 East - Vacant, Industrial Park (IP) District, Subarea 7 West - Union Bank of California, Industrial Park (IP) District, Subarea 7 B General Plan Designations Protect Site - Industrial Park North - Community Commercial South - Industrial Park East - Industrial Park West - Industrial Park Item "D" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00404 - HOGLE-IRELAND January 26, 2005 Page 2 C Site Characteristics The subject property is a rectangular parcel with an area of 58,722 square feet with an east-west dimension of about 314 feet and anorth-south dimension of about 187 feet It is located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and a drive aisle extension of Mayten Street Vehicular access to the site will be via an existing east-west drive aisle parallel with the south property line that connects with the Mayten Street extension and anorth-south drive aisle located about 300 feet to the east which, in turn, connects directly to Foothill Boulevard Direct pedestrian access will be provided by a sidewalk that connects the Mayten Street extension to a walkway at the south side of the building The property is generally level and about 5 feet lower than the street surface of Foothill Boulevard The site has been cleared of vegetation for several years. With the exception of short grass, there is no other vegetation on-srte. D Parking Calculations. Square Parking Number of Spaces Number of Tvoe of Use Footage Ratio Regwred Spaces Provided Restaurant 2,500 1/100 25 Restaurant Patio 400 1/100 4 Retail 1,950 1/250 8 Dental Office 3,500 1/200 18 Totaf 55 56 ANALYSIS. A General The protect site is located at the northeast quadrant of the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park which is anchored by Lowes Home Improvement, a speaalty retail warehouse Currently, the parcels to the south (Parcels 6, 7, and 8) and to the east (Parcel 3) of the site are undeveloped Immediately to the west (Parcel 1) is Union Bank of California About 400 feet to the east (Parcel 3) is Carrow's Restaurant At this time, tenants for the building were undetermined. However, the applicant has provided a speculative list of tenants of reasonably mixed uses including retail stores, a restaurant, and a dental office As shown above, the parking calculations reflect this mix. These uses are consistent with this development distract, the proposed bwidmg, and the surrounding industnal and commeraal uses The closest residential development is over 1/4 mile north of the site, located across Foothill Boulevard Although the master plan does not have an adopted architectural guideline and material palette, the Planning Commission has stated that the overall quality of architecture for pad bwldings within the master plan should be on par with the Lowes Home Improvement store The applicant anticipates four tenants for this building, with entrances at the south side Emphasis to the entrances will be provided by two tower elements on the southeast and southwest corners and by a large trellis feature between them An additional trellis will be provided at the west side of the building (over the outdoor eating area) Parapets of varying heights and honzontal articulation of the wall planes will provide visual interest All elevations have tiled wainscots and extensive glass (spandrel and vision) Additional accent features that are included on ail elevations include decorative medallions, score Imes, and accent arches In 2001, the City adopted the Route 66/Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan which regwres protects located along Foothill Boulevard t~ incorporate thematic features and elements, such as a post and cable barrier, that are representative of Historic Route 66 The installation of this barrier will be a condition of approval for about 314 feet of frontage along Foothill Boulevard '~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00404 - HOGLE-IRELAND January 26, 2005 Page 3 B Grading Committee The Grading Committee reviewed the protect on December 14, 2004, and recommended approval with conditions The Grading Committee's conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution as Conditions of Approval C Design Review Committee The Committee (Fletcher, Stewart, Coleman) reviewed the protect on September 14, 2004. As the applicant had diligently addressed many of staff's comments regarding the proposed building architecture and site layout during the rewew process, the Committee recommended approval with only a few minor revisions as recommended by staff, including the addition of accents to match the surrounding buildings and more trees (Exhibit "H"). The applicant agreed to incorporate the staff's recommendations into the protect design The Design Review Committee's comments and conditions have been incorporated into the attached Resolution of Approval. D. Technical Review Committee• The Technical Review Committee reviewed the protect and recommended approval subtect to the conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval. E. Environmental Assessment. The 1 35-acre site is within the master-planned Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park, a 140-acre commercial and industrial complex, located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue The design of the protect is in compliance with the approved Master Plan (Development Review DRC99-11 and Development Review Modification DRC99-11 MOD) A Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted for the original Master Plan in April of 1999 Subsequently, in June of 2000, a Mitigation Monitoring Program was adopted by the Planning Commission, and, in February of 2002, a Negative Declaration was adopted for the modification to the original Master Plan (DRC99-11 MOD) and the corresponding parcel map for this site (Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15630) The protect will be required to implement all pertinent mitigation measures adopted in the previous Negatroe Declarations, thereby ensuring that any potential impacts of the protect will remain less than significant Staff is of the opinion that no further environmental rewew is necessary because the protect is (1) consistent with the approved master plan and (2) within in the protect scope of the above-cited, prior environmental assessments RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends approval of DRC2004-00404 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions Respectf y submitted, Brad City Planner Attachments Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Floor/Roof Plan Exhibit "F" -Elevations Exhibit "G" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "H" - Design Review Committee Action Agenda dated December 14, 2004 Exhibit "I" -Initial Study Draft Resol ution of Approval for DRC2004-00404 ~ -3 d` "".". c N 2 ,~N m cu`~, €N `aa~~a lin'' S _' ''y ~ vwmrw~ae ' V `{ - N Sti ~ ~ :ate ~.. :,~ " areAidn um -4v`ni 979 - 'ggay ABY.~~ - __ _..,_ ._ I m _ eassw ^- - w.woNO s"y y ~ r~r4']` Otl9MM31 ~ 9 3i p0 Y• ` ff„i~ ,~.yr.-~...ir -~?i _ y' 3R eppppppe V~~ a ry_3mv~x ~ .. ZSZV e ~~e83drg.~.~. ~ a aE,~~P~~r~~a~~ % s Q~ ~N'°`waV LL .S aS~E ¢°~ r.°s ~ ,• ^d g~5:?'.yg". :f,~ti ` yq z.,.,,.~~~a~~ f ~~:r.wrn 1j5n7i r'..~~w-.mpe i ..~f ~. , i,.~ 4',~Qe a '°~~ae~ ~. ~~ ~.~~g ~~..if imvN.~4q ~r..~w{' A,,.S'c 1 Y,'~°^ya ~y"~,` 5~~~$j'I,,.a,.e` ~~b"y, `3 '~'~`tiFri+, o°Ja yb, ~ ,~N zzOz Y4 ~~ ~ ~~ m vYrMi YvN"t •IS]N jay T Z ..X U ~ 6NfU ~ e~4 ~ ., i N.YU y -'3~C O 3 0 ...~. .o..".°y-~" -~-~G~.iT r Y3Y, Ipr _,3c~ eryr~ -49 i rw _ ~_ c"a:.w E n• N Y ~'G 8 "~ ~ywr.J~'e [[[(~ ~ ~3WY1~ NEIYKCM0. i, - Y'f T•-~' \ y~ i ~ 1 G aC ~ ~ ~ 3 " L~ i' 31rry1rnA aa ~ ~ 3Atl YlONtlO 8 z u.msw -15Yar~rv - e ~ u)wy tl r^ ~ v __ ~t "~ 3Ebw1 , L.Y 2¢ ~ vruc: «wN 'r'^M Oa i Nr,p~nu wrnu-m Nw"'~. y G Afl G Y Em "VBuaa ~nw G ~ ~ b a €~m"~~ 6 ~ 6~ G t~ ~ - _~ ~ ~ ~ U ® ~ a~ 3M a 15tlf1V11113 a ~ 3nY ~ 3bONA11YJ 3nv 3ATIBIM Y ' K -Yrs. ~ A I{ ~ 1YMW3l ~ MNO x j 5 1Y••, A;~ sw v+^ £ ~ @~ gB RAMONA~sAVE ~ _, Y- B g a` 88 4+ ~ 3~Y M ~ "°mA~ .8 x snr~ ":~xm 8 ~ ~ ~mm~~~ARCHIBAL~AV~E a^. .. W m 3!bgNrrKInX ~„ ~ f~ g s.r wave EXHIBIT `A' a b0 t9VWN ba neeae3rvnr tl0 dO55AH 3.~.SM~LL~~ # ~~ g, m ~ _ ' VaAR~~F ~4y~. a>u~~wv 3 - _ I E ~ i f i a BN A -' 8 L ' ~ _ '~AV H'Jbn09llld @9 z +....v yLA- %r» ~~v. -- ! Lu.~..1-d+++m-~.~ ~• ~~ ~v ~ \_Y. _ ZN _~f HI y ~' aY. .,J sO¢ ~ "'"_"_' " - - - ~ ~ ~ ' wx~i y~JNy,Sgy~ __ ___~ - ~ -_ ____ _ _~ ~~~~ r ~l m ~~µ~ E' _ r ~3~~ ,, ..,~ r gg, ~ v Rr~L~ y. sNv 1~ ~n F ~ ~ a ~~~~gg d' ar - ~ ^ ° "i ¢ ~, d ~ xr r~ ; y~ ~ y ~~ ~ ~ T ii ~i ~~Fy~.Q P ¢ < ~ Z J "' ~,` ~ n J0y ' g 2 \\\ > w 9nv rrdas p~~a ~ ~~~ ~'O ~~ » CJ2~ 3~~ 3YYY11 ~ Vt r - ~ x ua~.' OT q i v "1 3AVtl31N30 6 ~~ ~ F m g o -~ ~ ~_ _~~ ~ 3 rE~ w M yy _ Z vro-vaoi _-_Y--- ~ ~ --aw ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N3AVH G ~~" ~ ~ 4 ;6 S ~ wMO ~JtQi 3 wmr~ Wtl3um ¢U CC p,¢¢~ i Fpq4 s~ppy9 ~y+ R r«, ;3y iSF f JM_ pG kY ~ ~ p's ~i 9 ~a ~ J~v; sr _ ~ N °wumm 2"~ mrwYnmv raj ~'~ wY~ n ~ ....,.99994' `4_ ^~_ s81.¢~u ~~_ ~ :_,Q''¢ 1~ ti.miaY° x r s"` v..ww~a ~'IJ aziav~.f ~ ~v.3mr~~~~U Y --, ~.r ~ _.__ ~g 3Atl UlV91HJHtl xmsmu- xrryrst dF ~'3nr" 9 - : ~_r-~~r rvbrvsn~ 5 G ~ w nei+sna ~ .v 31YJI131 3n6• 3YN ~3uain~c ~V 311~f131 ~ tt~¢¢ ~riwsrw atiuEmn 3Atl3LH~tl)bri m m m S Jb~ iAb 311NrhYry E m ti (iN w F 151~AH13Wb ~ ~ °'r~ ~ ~ € ~d y __ Hurt ¢ ~vuq ~~ ~ux.vr.On Oy___3AY 3H ~ ~ > 3Atl SMf13H E -_ ~ "g4' $ 3m YAM Ut ~ ~ $6~N,°°°"N'" LL w - ~ 3 LL m~"wtN(p o • _=.-rv~-•~.®~.-I. rsra w z~ _NYrm~/YxL~Y- t^ *OruW3nr,j 5 r ` 1 _.._...V, Atl tl31N30 ~~ u.rne _. _~~ I - - 6 ._ ____.......Y. { __" k` ~~ isas.w~ ' '~sc "~ ~mNn _ ~ '1 _~ ~ ~~ e`~ q ' a p 11 q 8~ ~~ F.~ e@ a 1 @A O b 11 ~~~ m li 'I ~, Y'~ ~y ! 6 7.-3 ~ ~~~~ll h y {~ F g ~ ~ I °~ ~ a s ~~~ ~• tf ', > ~ w ~' ,a +fl ~,• a i~` ~ f y~~ ~'-~!~ ffi .~ .,~~ ~'?: ~o i _°1 •, :` • dj31l~ ~ ~zP EXHIBIT `B' ~~r't l~ '~~l~~~ ~l:I ~ ~~. ~ ~,1 ,~ 8, ~ ;I t! ~yq h ~HBfIHN# ~ ' ~f0 '~ RfNHIHHHfNI~fN+HHINHINf#N ~~ f IOOMi}H~, ~ a~ ° e ,e fD~fNtHl~"' ~~~~~~~ {~ •: p~ ~~~ 9 ® ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ F~ i~ i,~ a~ m 2 n V - -__ _.J - _ ' ~3 , Monument Slgn~° ~ FROJEC l yJ1L ID SIGN E %iSTING ~ II II UBOC U ll 2'13' - 3" Rane~.or eNr E ~~ - /1000 80 stalls )6/1000:80 stalls _ P M 15fi 70 i;i.i ~ 51GNA~I$E 'NT[q$ECTI°" F O O T ] 7iq S ILL BLVD. fi--- ---- I +: :I+. A B I ~ ry C D ~ m f + .._ . ... .... n ~ .. o . m 1 m I I ! " . to i I T4 + 7 t t I t It e I itf VACANT UNIMPOROVED I ItS IO 7J~ Y 4 ff t ~ M 15630 F ~i~~l9i'~~I ~~ « I ~O .a rcr y^ m ~~ 6 ~ayS+ t ~ V ~ I li^I LC~®1.{-®~~11.1~ ~Bllll.// llll lL/llLSe~llll~lLII L~ANG.'Q-Q® 6;U~AAA®13i®AA 4'®4~QD6FAb7E ~A~4f-H.®FA'B'§ ~N'%9EElR Sff.O ~4:DQD'9'6~!%.IL ~%.~ fis RAAl''H'!EN ~T TABULATIONS SPfE INFORMA710N Descnpllon Par<et 2 0l Parcet Man t56J0 56 ]22 SR FI Sne Area It J5 Pc I vetvcular Coverage 29058 Sp Ft Ven+cular Coverage Per cenlage a95 Lanbscape Coverage n o) SF 0f9% BUIIDINC k PARKING INFORMATION Atl pdrkTg 51a115 are 9 ~ t8 Dnve Alsle Wltlln MIn 25 0 5'fB MEOF tISH BIDL SF ARM PARRML MTIO PARFIIiC sPAC6f A R¢slaurdnt )500 $c v+00 )s AP PdbO e00 Sc +n00 e Commercial 9+5 SF a/+000 C COmmerGal 315 SF an000 o Oenlal ONICe asap sF s/+ooo la 10Fg1 1950 $G e00 $F Oq rlO IRepuveJl Total ReOurt etl Stalls 55 stalls Total PrO VIUetl Stalls 5G ;tells NOTES t Pldr+l ers well be pr ovltletl along Ine slees 01 park ing zlaus Planmrs well be separated Irom parking areJs by a 6 loco rdlse0 cpncrele curb 2 1 space of )) 51 area promtletl for motorcycle parLing J One J hike racks p+ovibee Ot/30 parhmg space; a All root moon lea epwpmenl Inc Wbing MVAO 8 antenas well be screened Irom public vi,w by parapet S A m m f tool canble of illummalipn usnall be mainlametl aU055 me sorlace of the Amite pares ing at ea Llgm vantlaras In peeing Ipls snap not e.ce etl f5 leer In neigm antl mall he awnneclur ally compallEle wlln Ine builOmg Llgnl scan Oa r05 snarl be low prollle ae sign an0 snarl not cause glare On atllacenl proper LES Note Indl lots neignt mclutles Ine hasa pule anU fiapre and ns measw ea from Ine bmsnetl 5urlace of toe par Ming lot NORTH "yIl~C~ ~~~.IItIl Scale t//H2~0\ /1 ll~~ November 18, 2004 I i ~I I ~ I I I I ~ `~ I ,` 'I e l I I , II I I ~~ I ~ oe I I 11 ~ II II i Ijt~~ ly ~ ~ II m II ~ t ~ I I F ~~~ I 0 II O it I I h I~ i I p ~} I~I I I .^ II j ~I V 1 I, / 1 1 ~/ ~// ~,/ i ~ ,% it ~~ ,h + I,~, a c I~r i i r~i ~s ~ ~~ i ~ ~ ~ s i r, - ---- - m ~ ~~ ~ ! i ' o N ' ' / i~ i ~ s-~ o o f _ y ~ ~ ~ ~~ . / o - r YYY ~, ` o ~ ~m ~ j ~ /I I ~ i I 1 i ~ .°$~ le I ~~~ '~ ,~ ~ ~ ; ,, r~ ! '~ ! ! 1` i ~~ ,~ i -' / ' i~i ,1 / ~/ .~ ~ / ~~ ~~ ~ ~ 0 1 ~ \\ I / 1 ,~ ')/nf~' jl y ~ ~' 1 I f~ S ~, ~ ~. '~ ~U-~~ ItQJ~~ u !1 'i i 2 ~~ ' a - i ~ ~-~- ~~ Ir ~ _~ 1~ i i l run iyt ` i be ~__ 0 ' b i i i 'p} ' i t ~ t ~ - i, i i i \ ~% w i `_~~ ~\ i ~ ~ _i -"1 I // >. ~ i / i ~ ~ ~ i i li 1~ ~~ 1v Oi i ~ ~ j i ~ ~ C=_ ~; ~ l 0 ~ '' ' 1, ~, .i ~ '~ ~- -- r~-- J~ I I 3l V/~/Ld 133U15 ~lilYW rJ ! a T .~ `e _ t. ____ __ -~- r• EXHIBIT `D' --------------- ---- ~-=7 --- ------------------------------------- ------------ ~I r~ ° _~_~--~- -- 1 - ~ - ~} r ~ ^ 1 ------ ---- v _ _ I I I I +-+-F 'I I \ Ig 19 I ~ ~ ~ +-~-F $I \\ Ig 0 -~-J ~j 0 ~ -- lL p ~ a e ~F I - I m W A O Y ~ ~ I I Ii-~ 1~ I I / In a ~ m -~ I ~ I t`7 a N I I m I I 'f~-~-- I d i l I t __ ___ ___ w ale ~ t tLLn o ipz I II e ' e ~ I I~ `L I r w e ~ a OJ r w ak-s T I ul e ~ ®~ ! q \ I tt Q ._____ LL_~ J ___ ~ I I l ~t I -w.n.~-I \ ~ I 4 ~ a a ,t'-r w ~ n m rn rn¢ w J~J~_l I ~' I \ ___________ _ _ -I~- ' I ~ _ I 14'iVl ..0'.QL I ~ I o ° JL_i_ I ~ ~ I LL 0= I wi ~ w O x ~ ~ Ya o wi -~-'_f .w gl I~ W 1[J 21- c 1 I Y a d N 2 I I I Q )I 13 N Z W I I-F `o 41 ~ ~ $ I OS T '-~ I el ; I , - ~ Slll3tll EXHIBIT `E' ~-~i m 00 V c soon{ eLEVnnoN NORTH ELEVATION an sr :, c :~-,,:s •,, „u,Lr iiF i ~nncuconrvlce ~ A ~ DETAILS Nol rp scale LEGEND p F ep as Dw w~~p,~N F. p cpm, ® F,aaea B]a}W N , i s Fie IE Colo, Q F,aiae B]eaD Goppeei $p, ngb Cp,ni<e a mm cpm. Q F,atCB BS66N N~gnl Sari Base Color Q GIis3 $Ip,elrpnl ® Waop l,ellis L~g~l Beige O Dp< , ..e cpl ® Canoas1 Awrvngu$unp,eila Fp,esl G,een afi]1 ® the NOTE. iENANI nl Ip eEeprtllp ppSS~ple S~qn Ipaclip~2 BICIdL UNDeRWOOD pa,p~~~s15~®,~//ma~lr~TT®qRR FF6ypJSd~~,I~~TB91llv1~JJq/m~ILCU~JIalp~~dp 1~SJSe~pa~JSpll ~~~I~~L~IIR~IC1Ill JS l~ IRf1AV W1lll® ,1a0/`1W1vLL®6tlLL-(-,Y®YW[ ®IMl11ll IG IC l1V[SY4•~®VV IG~S ~1.aa1C.lV Y IGW ffiH.ffi~~M ®N~ ..°..I ° "^. $g~ ff~'1C~[Q6,IL 1~Il.RNASt7C~hV ~4. ber 03a 2004 ensr ELevnnoN wErr ELevnnoN 1 ~J 0 5~ d O p-~ r 5 `eY~ i~! :; a:S ®oe !$ 9~~~ :f~'~ 7 ~~ ~~~~ e:9 :0~~ •~ii SS:: BBB® ®'~ ~~~ ~s~ rG ~~~ P' ~1 . e~ ' t~ :~ ly ~ 1! rn X IT -~--~---~~ ^^~ Y• V ~- Aonumen~ Slgn~ \e PROJECT ~ ol. a ID SIGN -~-- FOOTHILL BLVD. " _ . , ., - ~~ 213.3" ~- i'~"° -~ ~ ~~ _ _ _ r_ _ _ ~ _--____-_ _ ~ ~ _ _ ~ ' a ~ ~ ~ I - __ . I - -- -- -- I I ' --- :^ ~ I I " - ~~, SITE PLAN 1"=20'-0" PexixsOla f _i CAMONGA CORPORATE PARK - ANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN-NOVEMBER 19, 2004 lecc rwnnn~a rhun rW ..~.,..-......-. ~.,, ~xm rm ® .~~.~a~~.e.-: am rae ~ .d...-,_..~ __ ~ ...r.~..~,.._.d raw ar nu , wa rae O ..._~...~s ®ev,r ".r... ®xu "~-M r 1 ®VICINITY MAP - NTS r~~~ " ~~_ ~_~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS , 7.20 p m. Mike Smith December 14, 2004 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00404 - HOGLE-IRELAND, INC - A request to construct a commeraal budding of 8,750 square feet for a retail use, a dental office, and a restaurant in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7), located at the southeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and Mayten Street - APN: 0229-011-84 Design Parameters: The project site is located at the southeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and Mayten Street on a parcel of 58,722 square feet (about 314 feet wide by 187 feet deep) The properties to the north, south, and east are vacant, and the property to the west is developed Nnth a pad budding (Union Bank of California). The site is part of the Catellus Master Plan that was conceptually approved by the Planning Commission on April 28,1999 (related file: DR 99-11), and includes Lowes Home Improvement (speGalty retail), Farmer Boys (restaurant), and Carrows (restaurant) The exstng topography slopes falls approximately 9 feet north to south. An existing, east-west drive aisle along the south side of the site allows vehicular access to Mayten Avenue and to other parts of the commeraal complex. Pedestrian access has also been provided from the southwest comer of the bwiding directly to Mayten Avenue, and via other sidewalks connecting east and west The proposed budding will have four tenant spaces. The pnmary entrances to each proposed tenant space is from the south side of the building. The padang area is situated along the south and east side of the budding and is comprised of 56 parking stalls. Landscape coverage is 19 percent; the minimum regwrement is 15 percent for this development district. The proposed building is comprised of architecture that is consistent with the surrounding pad tenants. Key features inGude raised "towers" at the east and west ends of the budding, arched soffets, columns, and the extensive use of storefront and spandrel glass on all elevations. The south face of each tower element projects horizontally about 10 feet from the pnmary south wall plane of the building. Beneath them, colonnades have been incorporated, further emphasizing the entrances of the primary tenants and providing shade A 40-foot by 12-foot trellis has been proposed by the applicant to define the entrances of the "secondary' tenants, it also serves to visually connect the tower elements at each end. Another trellis of similar size is proposed over the patio area at the west side of the budding. Canvas canopies at each vnndow provide additional shading Detail features inGude cornice trim, wainscots, and reveals on all wall planes to match Canows Restaurant and Union Bank of California The stucco finish and colorHnll also match those buildings. Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues: None Secondary Issues Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. Reduce wall sign letter height to a maximum 18 inches (not 30 inches as shown), consistent with the approved Uniform Sign Program EXHIBIT `H' p-~3 DRC COMMENTS DRC2004-00404 - HOGLE-IRELAND, INC December 14, 2004 Page 2 2 Provide two additional trees along the south elevation to be consistent with Gty Ordinance of one tree per 30 linear feet of elevation (160 feet divided by 30 feet = 5 trees) 3 Provide decorative accent medallions/quatrefoils at the four comers of the budding similar to those applied on the Union Bank of California building. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion Paint any metal service "mandoors" to match bwldmg walls. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee approve the proposal with the above modifications as cond~ons of approval. Desian Review Committee Action: Staff Planner. Mike Smith Members Present D-~`~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Development Review DRC2004-00404 2. Related Files: DR99-11, DRCDR99-11MOD, and SUBTPM15630 3. Description of Project: DRC2004-00404 - HOGLE-IRELAND - A request to construct a single-story building of about 7,700 square feet that will be comprised of a mix of retail and restaurant uses on 1 35-acre of vacant land in the Industrial Park District, Subarea 7, located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Mayten Street, APN 0229-011-84 Staff has found the protect to be within the scope of a previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program adopted by the Planning Commission on April 28, 1999, and June 28, 2000, respectively, and a Negative Declaration adopted by the Planning Commission on February 13, 2002. This protect does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered m the previous Negative Declarations Related Files DR99-11, DRCDR99-11MOD and SUBTPM15630 ~ 1 L~ The 1 35-acre infill site is within the master-planned Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park, a 140-acre commercial and industrial complex located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue The design of the protect is m compliance with the approved Master Plan (Development Review DR99-11 and Development Review DRC99- 11MOD) A Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted for the original Master Plan m April of 1999 Subsequently, in June of 2000, a Mitigation Monitoring Program was adopted by the Planning Commission for the original Master Plan (DR99-11). In February of 2002, a Negative Declaration was adopted for modification to the original Master Plan (DRCDR99-11 MOD) and the corresponding parcel map for this site and the surrounding area (SUBTPM15630) The protect will be required to implement all pertinent mitigation measures adopted in the previous Negative Declarations, thereby ensuring that any potential impacts of the protect will remain less-than-significant The Master Plan for the 140-acre site includes a Congestion Management ProgramlTraffic Impact Analysis (CMPlTIA) The approval of the Master Plan included a Mitigation Monitoring Program, including mitigation of traffic-related impacts, which apply to all protects within the Master Plan • A portion of the 140-acre Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park is within potential habitat for the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (DSF) A Habitat Assessment survey for the DSF was performed for a portion of the Corporate Park Master Plan (west of Milliken Avenue) known to contain potential habitat The results of the survey were negative, and the Corporate Park lacks the required Delhi-soils that provide appropriate habitat for the fly The proposed protect site is not located within an area known to be potential habitat for the DSF, and is about 1,500 away from any areas that have been identified as potential habitat for the DSF EXHIBIT `I' p-(~ Irntial Study for Development Review DRC2004-00404 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Hogle-Ireland Attn Pamela Steele 4200 Latham Street, Swte B Riverside, CA 92501 5. General Plan Designation: Industrial 6. Zoning: Industrial Park District, Subarea 7 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The protect site is an infill site located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and a drive aisle extension of Mayten SVeet The property is part of larger existing commeraal/industrial complex that is 'anchored' by a Lowe's home improvement store and several businesses on individual "pads" including, to the west, Union Bank of Califorrna and two restaurants, Farmer Boys and Islands Carrow's Restaurant is located about 300 feet to the east The parcels immediately to the east, south, and north across Foothill Boulevard are undeveloped Farther to the south is a 440,000 square foot warehouse bwiding The protect site was cleared as part of the development of the overall master planned site and has been modified from d original state 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Mike Smith (909)477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report. EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Envvonmental Impact Report NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,a -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management Distract URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model • (~-l (o r~ ~~ U Initial Study for Development Review DRC2004-00404 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages Aesthetics ()Agricultural Resources ()Air Quality Biological Resources ()Cultural Resources ()Geology & Sods Hazards & Waste Materials ()Hydrology & Water Quality ()Land Use & Planning Mineral Resources ()Noise ()Population & Housing Public Services ()Recreation () Transportation/Traffic Utilities & Service Systems ()Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the bans of this initial evaluation• (/) I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately m an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are impose up n the pr posed protect, nothing further is required or Prepared By Date Reviewed By / Date r/ ~/ ~~ p-~'~ Initial Study for Development Review DRC2004-00404 Clty of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (x) General Plan EIR (Certified October 2000) (x) Master Environmental Assessment for the 2000 General Plan Update (Certified October 2000) (x) Development Revew DRC99-11 Mitigated Negative Declaration (Adopted Apnl 1999) (x) Development Review DRC99-11 Mitigation Monitoring Program (Adopted June 2000) (x) Development Review DRC99-11 MOD Negative Declaration (Adopted February 2002) (x) SUBTPM15630 Negative Declaration (Adopted February 2002) (x) Retail Portion of the Rancho Cucamonga RKJK & Associates Inc ,May 2000 (Adopted February 2000) Corporate Park Site Speafic Traffic Analysis, © ~~ o RESOLUTION NO 05-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEWDRC200400404 AREQUESTTOC,ONSTRUCTACOMMERCIAL BUILDING OF 8,350 SQUARE FEET FOR A RETAIL USE, A DENTAL OFFICE, AND A RESTAURANT IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT, SUBAREA 7, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND MAYTEN STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0229-011-84 A Recitals 1 Hogle-Ireland, Inc , on behalf of Peninsula Development filed an application for the issuance of Development Review DRC2004-00404, as described rn the title of this Resolution Hereinafter rn this Resolution, the subtect Development Review request rs referred to as "the application " 2 On the 26th day of January 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on said application and concluded said meeting on that date 3 All legal preregwsrtes prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, detennined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. 1 This Commission hereby speGfically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on January 26, 2005, mcludrng written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to a parcel of 58,722 square feet located in the Industrial Park District, Subarea 7, at the southeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and a drive aisle extension of Mayten Avenue, v~nth an east-west dimension of about 314 feet, and anorth-south dimension of about 187 feet The property has been cleared of all vegetation except for ruderal grasses, and b. The property is part of an ewstmg master planned commercial and industrial complex of 140 acres that rs anchored by Lowes Home Improvement (warehouse retail) and rndudes Carrow's Restaurant, Farmer Boys Restaurant, and Union Bank of California, and c The properties immediately to the north, south, and east of the subtect site are vacant, and the property to the west is improved with the Union Bank of Calrfomia, and d The application contemplates the construction of a one-story budding of 7,950 square feet with an outdoor droning area of 400 square feet, and e The budding design, with articulated horizontal wall surfaces, parapets of varying heights, a colonnade on the south side, two primary budding materials, and several accent features Q -~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-07 DRC2004-00404 - HOGLE-IRELAND January 26, 2005 Page 2 that include decorative medallions and alarge-timber wood trellis on the west side, exhibits high-quality architecture and will make a positive statement along Foothill Boulevard, and f The proposed uses will not have a detnmental impact on the surrounding uses The closest residential development is located over a 1/4 mile north of the site, and g The application contemplates a mix of commercial and office tenants, such as restaurants, dental offices, and retail uses These are permitted land uses along Foothill Boulevard, which is one of the City's pnmary east-west artenal streets and a significant commercal comdor, and h. The project Hall incorporate a post and cable bamer, a Histonc Route 66 feature, along the Foothill Boulevard frontage in order to meet the obfectives of the Route 66 Visual Improvement Master Plan, and i The Planning Commission previously approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration on Apnl 28, 1999, for the 140-acre Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan, of which this site is a part Furthermore, the Plamm~g Commission previously issued a Negative Declaration for the update of the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15630 on February 13, 2002, of which this site is a part There have been no substantial changes in the area to warrant further environmental review, and 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and conGudes as follows a The proposed uses are in accord moth the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located b The proposed uses, together with the conditions applicable thereto, vwll not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally in~unous to properties or improvements in the wGrnty. c The proposed uses comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 4 An environmental review was completed for this site and surrounding development and corresponding parcel map approved by the Plamm~g Commission on Apnl 28, 1999, and February 13, 2002, respectively The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Mitigated Negatve Declaration has been adopted, no furtherenvironmental review ~s required for subsequent projects within the scope of the Mitigated Negative Declaration The proposed development is mnthin the scope of the poor Mitigated Negative Declaration and Negative Declaration, as the sde was always planned for development moth a development of this type and the size and scope have not changed Accordingly, no further environmental review ~s necessary Based upon the facts and infomtation contained in the poor Mitigated Negative Declaration and Negative Declaration, togetherwith wntten and oral staff reports, the Plamm~g Commission finds that there are no substantial changes in the project or the site and its surrounding conditions that would regwre revision to the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration or Negative Declaration. All environmental mitigation measures from the previously approved and updated Master Plan and parcel map have been implemented p-ao PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO OS-07 DRC2004-00404 - HOGLE-IRELAND January 26, 2005 Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every conddion setforth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference- Plamm~9 Department 1) Approval is for the construction of a 7,950 square foot bwlding and 400 square foot outdoor dining area (vnth overhead trellis) in the Industrial Park District, Subarea 7, located at the southeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and the drive aisle extension of Mayten Street - APN 0229-011-84 2) Dining, or similar outdoor activities as described in the City's Development Code, shall not be permitted beneath the trellis at the south side of the building 3) The accent medallions shall be framed byplaster-coated Styrofoam trim or equivalent 4) All score lines shall match those on Cartow's Restaurant 5) A post and cable bamer shall be provided behind the right-of--way along the Foothill Boulevard frontage to comply vinth the Historic Route 66/Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Master Plan The design of this feature shall match the existing post and cable used in front of Can'ow's Restaurant 6) Awnings over the storefront windows shall be a single, solid primary color Signs, miscellaneous text, or stripes vnll not be permitted 7) The rafters of the two trellises shall have a maximum spaGng of 12 inches on center 8) All signs shall comply with the City's Sign Ordinance In order to incorporate this bwlding and its related signs, an amendment to the existing Uniform Sign Program is required Signs regwre a separate design review and construction permit prior to installation. 9) Retaining walls exposed to the public shall be of decorative masonry Decorative means slump stone, split-face, or stucco to match the budding 10) The trash enGosure shall be surrounded vwth dense shrub plantings 11) London Plane, California Sycamore, and Flowering Plum trees shall be planted along the Foothill Boulevard frontage landscape setback behind the right-of-way 12) Landscaped berms shall be provided along the Foothill Boulevard frontage These berths shall be shown on the Grading and Landscape Plans ~-a ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-07 DRC2004-00404 - HOGLE-IRELAND January 26, 2005 Page 4 Enaineenng Department 1) Provide a Water Quality Management Plan (VIIQMP), to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and identify applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the Grading Plan Please refer to the "Notice Regarding WQMP Regwrement," dated December 7, 2004, for newly revised requirements 2) On-site landscaping shall be reviewed for conformance wdh the Foothill Boulevard Beautification Master Plan pnor to building permit issuance Buildino and Safety Department 1) Refer to the Bwlding and Safety handout regarding Grading Plan submittal requrements 2) A mirnmum of a 2-foot bench shall be provided between the top of slope and the post and cable bamer along the Foothill Boulevard frontage. 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF JANUARY 2005 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich MaGas, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plamm~g Commission of the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of January 2005, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS p -aa- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00404 SUBJECT: COMMERCIAL, RETAIL, AND RESTAURANT BUILDINGS APPLICANT: HOGLE IRELAND, INC LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND MAYTEN AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the altemattve, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition Copes of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 05-07 and Standard Conditions shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved rn the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner SC-„ -04 p-tai ComoleGOn Date / / / / / / / / / / Proiea No DRC2004-00404 Completion Date D. 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Bwlding Code and _/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be ~ submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Budding and Safety Department to show compliance The bwldings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations Incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_J_ submitted for Clty Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/~_ consistency prior to Issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance wdh all sections of the Development Code, all _/~_ other applicable Clty Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans In effect at the time of bwlding permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved ~~_ by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the Issuance of building permits Such plan shall Indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are regwred and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and ~~_ the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Clty Planner review and approval prior to the Issuance of bwlding permits 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be ~~_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Cdy Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 All building numbers and individual units shall be Identified in a clear and concise manner, ~~_ including proper illumination Shopping Centers 1 Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the City ~~_ Planner. a Architecturally integrated Into the design of (the shopping center/the project) ~~_ b Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to ~_/_ Include self-closing pedestrian doors c Large enough to accommodate two trash bins _/_/_ d Roll-up doors ~~- e Trash bins with counter-weighted lids _/~- f Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis ~_J- g Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed ~~_ to be hidden from view 2 Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours _/_/_ 3 The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and ~_/~ debris remain for more than 24 hours SC-1-04 2 p-a Prgect No DRC2004-00404 Completion Date 4 Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only " _/_/_ 5 Alf operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants a Noise Level -All commercial actroities shall not create any noise that would exceed an _/_/_ exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 p m until 7 a m and 65 d6 during the hours of l a m until 10 p m b Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or ~~_ other handling of boxes, crates, containers, bwlding materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p m and 7 a m unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area 6 Textured pavement shall be provided across arculation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza ~~_ They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof Full samples shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits 7 The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program It shall include the plaza _/_/_ area fighting fixtures, budding fighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot 6ghtmg fixtures 8 Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed into the building faces and shall not extend into _/_/_ the pedestrian walkways The design details shall be reviewed and approved by the Crty Planner prior to the issuance of bwlding permits. E. Building Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including av conditioners and other roof mounted egwpment and/or _/_/_ projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as regwred by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the bulding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in building plans 2 For commeraai and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main _/~_ bwlding colors F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long W hen a side of any parking space abuts ~~_ a bwlding, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _//_ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, ~~_ and exits shall be striped per City standards 4 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _//_ parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped 5 Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more ~/_ parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet SC-1-04 3 Project No DRC2004-00404 Comolehon Date G. H. Trip Reduction 1 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercal, office, industrial, and multifamily _/_/_ residential pro/ects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces regwred are 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces regwred exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and _/ /_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 A minimum of 30% within commercial and office pro/acts, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch _/_/_ box or larger 3 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking _/_/_ stalls 4 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view ad/scent to and along structures at a rate of one _/_/ tree per 30 linear feet of budding 5 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be inGuded in _/_ the regwred landscape plans and shalt be subtect to City Planner review and approval and . coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Department 6 Speaal landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specmen size trees, meandering _I_/_ sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Foothill Boulevard 7 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/_/_ perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 8 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the _/_/_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department 9 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of _/_/_ Xenscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval _/_/ Any signs proposed for this development shall complywith the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs SC-1-04 p -acs Protect No DRC2004-00404 Comoletion Date • C~ APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) J. General Requirements Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbrng and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, waterandwaste diagram, sewer or septic system location, facture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Protect Number (i e , DRC2004-00404) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal. 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the Ctty prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Department K. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2004-00404) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Balding and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of bwlding permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or mator addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map recordation and poor to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m. and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays SC-1-04 5 ~-ate ~-/- ~~- ~~- ~~. ~~. -/~- -/_J- -/-/- //- Protect No DRC2004-00404 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public counter) L. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Budding Code (CBC) for properly line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Bwlding Code for required occupancy separations 3 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC Section 1505 4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the regwred fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A 5 Openings In exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A 6 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed M. Grading 1 Grading of the subfect property shall be in accordance wdh Calfomia Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to pertorm such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Bwlding and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is requred for all new construction protects and for existing bwldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Crod Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Street Improvements Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be Installed per City Standards in accordance with the Citys street tree program Comoleeon Date _/_/~ -~-~- i -/-/- ~! ~~_ ~~_ ~~- ~_/_ ~~- -'~'i ~-~- ~_~- ~-/- SC-1-04 ~=ag Prgect No DRC2004-00404 2 Install street trees per Clty street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street Improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree Installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The Clty Engineer reserves the nght to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional Information, contact the Project Engineer Min Common Grow Street Name Botanical Name Name Space Spacing Size Gty Foothill Boulevard' Rhus lances African Informal Groups 15 Gal ~ Pnmanly in R O W Sumac 20' O C -Not (should mingle on-site) more then 25 of total frontage trees On-Site' Plantanus London Plane Space per on- 15 Gal ~ acenfolia Tree site plans - 30' O C suggested This primary theme tree for Foothill Boulevard must be behind the RO W Mdlennwm Court Pisfaaa chinensis Chinese 30' O C 15 Gel Pistache On-site and off-site plans must be coordinated The entire frontage should be designed as a whole, according to the Foothill Design theme The African Sumacs that fall within the R O W should be shown on the Public Improvements Plans Behind the R O W ,any other African Sumacs, along with the London Plane trees should be shown on the on-site plans. The on-site plans should reference R O W. trees, but show them as dashed (for reference only) Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with Clty standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City Inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are sub)ect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only O. General Requirements and Approvals Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit Is fully refundable If at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation Is provided to the Clry Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect Completion Date -/-/. -/-/- SC-1-04 7 ~ a~ Protect No DRC2004-00404 Completion Date O. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall ~_/_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first bwlding permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: P. Security Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. _/~_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2 All bwldings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the bwldings, wRh ~~_ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development 3 Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures ~~_ Q. Security Hardware 1 All roof openings giving access to the bwlding shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, _/~~ or alarmed R. Windows 1 Storefront windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic ~-/- 2 Security glazing is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and impede ~_/_ entry to burglars S. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime ~_/_ wsibthty T. Alarm Systems 1 Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed Instructing management and _/_/_ employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and irves 2 Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriff's dispatch number (909) 941-1488 _/~_ APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SC-1-04 ~- ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS November 4, 2004 Multi-tenant Building SEC Mayten & Foothill Blvd DRC2004-00404 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design gudelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercialhndustnal protects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are i At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways n At intersections ui On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District v A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building c If any portion of a facility or budding is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facdrty or budding, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fire flow shall be provided d Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of regwred fire flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The regwred minimum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring This regwrement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances -~I 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radws of the proposed protect may be used to provide the required fire flow subiect to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adiacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow 3 Firewater plans are required for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Budding permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 4 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire spnnkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specfications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained pnor to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in: Commercial or mdustnal structures greater than 7,500 square feet 2 Assembly and Educational Occupancy Buildings FSC-5 Fire Alarm System 1 The 2001 CBC, based on the number of sprinkler heads requires a spnnkler monitonng fire alarm system must be installed in the budding Refer to the California Building Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the Califoma Fire Code 2 Pnor to installation of the bwlding's fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a budding permit must be obtained Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire Distract access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as prvate roads, streets dnve aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Lanes Standard 9-7 Location of Access All portions of the structures 15' story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire Distract vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the budding Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The maximum inside tum radws shall be 20-feet c The minimum outside tum radws shall be 46-feet d The minimum radws for cut-de-sacs is 45-feet ~~ The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side • g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14- feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows a In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or mator fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire Distract access to all regwred openings 4 Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings 5 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire Distract standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 6 Approved Fire Department Access: must be shown on the architectural submittal FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly assoaated with the business operations and/or bwlding construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is regwred prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not speafically described below, which in the tudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property • Battery Systems • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Compressed Gases • Public Assembly • Dry Cleaning Plants • Refrigeration Systems • Flammable and Combustible Ligwds • Spraying or Dipping Operations • Hazardous Materials • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • Liquefied Petroleum Gases • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Bwldings 3~~ FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation o egwpment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 200 California Bwlding, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fue Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire Distract "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee FCS-14 Map Recordation Reciprocal Access Agreement The plan as submitted indicate that the required Fire Department access a Is located on property which is not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property line; or c Is shared by multiple owners; or d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire Distract The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or othe~ structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire Distract approval The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino 2 To assist Fire Construction Services in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal The current title reports to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties included in the agreement b The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subject to the agreement A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire Distract access, the width, turn radn and slope of roadway surface shall be provided The access roadway shall comply with the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement The plans as submitted indicate that a required private fire mains or appurtenances Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant, or Crosses a property line, or Provide service to adtacent properties, or Is located on common space under the control of an owner's assocation, or 4 ~~ e Is shared by multiple owners Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the pnvate water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection egwpment essential to the water supply The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District The agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Pnvate Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, speafications, flow test data and calculations for the pnvate water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distnct Standards. Approval of the on-site (pnvate) fire underground and water plans is required pnor to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections All pnvate on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delrvenng any combustible framing matenals to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the . locations of all new public fire hydrants for the revew and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radds of the protect Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard 9-8 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delroenng any combustible framing matenals to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6"above the finished surface of the road 4 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' . "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" 5 ~~ PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fir hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamong Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shalt be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2 Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on- site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer andJor owner are responsible for hinng the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the regwred fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire spnnkler monitonng system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire spnnkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subiect to the release of power) 5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or egwpment is placed in service 6 Ftre Alarm System Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm syste~ shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7 Access Control Gates Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services 8 Fire Access Roadways: Pnor to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways 9 Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi- family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be regwred on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial and industrial buidings The swte designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all swtes 10 Hazardous Materials Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant mus~ demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services J 6 3(a 11 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject bwiding or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 12 Mapping Site Plan Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a S %' x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and bwlding features as regwred in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector • p'3~1 T H E C I T Y O F R A N C U O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE January 26, 2005 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Dan Coleman, Prinapal Planner SUBJECT USE DETERMINATION DRC2005-00002 -ALL ABOUT FUN LLC - A request to determine that an indoor family entertainment center, including inflatable play egwpment and games, for birthdays, church and school fundraising, and corporate events, is similar to Recreation Facilities and/or Entertainment land use categones within the industnal distracts . BACKGROUND In the past few weeks, several potential businesses, all offering a similar business concept of an indoor amusement facility for parties, have made inquines with staff about various locations in the nudustral area To date, all ingwnes have been regarding properties located within the General Industrial (Subarea 8) Staff explained to all inquirers that the Development Code did not have a specific land use category for this type of business, and that there were several categories that it may fall within depending upon the specifics of their business operation, therefore, a use determination would be necessary USE DETERMINATION PROCESS Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17 02 040 gives the Planning Commission the authority to make use determinations "In order to ensure that the Development Code regulations will permit all similar uses in each district, the Planning Commission, upon its own initiative or upon written request, shall determine whether a use not specifically listed as permitted, secondary, accessory, or temporary use in any district shall be deemed a permitted use or conditional use in one or more distracts on the basis of simtlarity to uses speafically listed " A use determination is not site specific, rather, it relates to the land use defirntions of an entire district Once a land use determination is made, then that use would be permitted or conditionally permitted on any property within any district that allows such use ANALYSIS A General The City's industrial area is divided into subareas, each with their own purpose and list of permitted and conditionally permitted land uses Certain types of commeraal uses are allowed in the industrial area, particularly those that support industry, such as . office furniture stores The applicant requests that their use be classified as "entertainment since our activity's [sic] include inflatable items and table type games " Other inquiries have requested that the use be defined as "recreation facilities" because of the emphasis on providing a play space The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract Item "E" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00002 -ALL ABOUT FUN LLC January 26, 2005 Page 2 has determined that the use would be an A3 "assembly" occupancy group under the boling and fire codes B Description of Proposed Use The applicant's complete description of the business operation is attached (Exhibit "A") The applicant describes their business as a "family entertainment center" for indoor amusement The facility will be reservable for private parties and fundraiser or corporate parties and have open admission to the general public during limited hours The faality will provide large rooms filled with inflatable play egwpment (Exhibit "B"), table games, a rock climbing wall, and snack/dnnk vending machines The use is distinguishable from Chuck "E" Cheese and Discovery Zone in that they do not prepare food (the customer bangs their own food in or has the event catered) and they do not use hard ABS plastic play egwpment The applicant indicates their business would be open Monday through Friday 10 00 a m to 10 00 p m ,Saturday 9 00 a m to 10 00 p m ,Sunday 10 00 a m to 9 00 p m ,and "Grad Night" from 10 00 p m to 600am The applicant has provided flyers (Exhibit "C") from other family entertainment centers located in Califorrna, such as "Pump It Up" in Lake Forest, "Scooter's Jungle" in Aliso Viejo and Placentia, and "Adventure Zone" in Santa Rosa Some of these faalities are located in industrial bwldings C Purpose of General Industrial (Subarea 8) This subarea is located along both sides of • Arrow Route, extending from Utica Avenue to the easterly aty limits (Exhibit "D") The primary function of Subarea 8 is to provde for General Industrial activities and to assure for a transition area from the Heavy Industrial category located to the south of this subarea " Subarea 8 permits Recreation Facilities and conditionally permits Entertainment and Public Assembly uses The complete list of allowable uses is attached (Exhibit "E") The City has seen a variety of indoor Recreation Facilities throughout the industrial area, including gymnastics and martial arts studios, health clubs, a soccer practice faality (in Subarea 8), gun shooting range, and baseball practice facility D Current Codes Within the industrial area, the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 17 Development Code, has the following definitions of "Entertainment," "Recreation Facilities," and "Public Assembly " Entertainment Activities typically include, but are not limited to, entertainment services, excluding adult entertainment, within an enclosed bwlding to assembled groups of spectators or participants, as well as activities typically performed at private and non-profit clubs and lodges Uses typically include, but are not limited to dance halls, motion picture theaters, and meeting halls Recreational Faalities Actroities typically include, but are not limited to, sports performed either indoors or outdoors which regwre a faality for conducting the recreational activity Uses typically include, but are not limited to health clubs, exercise studios or classes, swimming centers, skating ranks, bowling alleys, tennis . courts, sports fields, and golf courses ~-a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00002 -ALL ABOUT FUN LLC January 26, 2005 Page 3 Public Assembly Activities typically include, but are not limited to, those performed by, or at, the following institutions or installations (1) Parks, botanical gardens, and open space areas of a passive use character, (2) Public and semi-public playgrounds and playing field, and open space areas of an active use character, and (3) Public and semi-public meeting halls Within the commercial areas, the Code has the following definitions of "Commercal Recreation" Commercial Recreation A use providing recreation, amusement, or entertainment services including indoor, such as theaters, bowling lanes, billiard parlors, skating arenas, and similar services " The proposed business has characteristics similar to all four land use categories, as summarized in the table below Commercial Entertainment Recreation Facilities Public Assembly Recreation • Assembled • Sports performed • Public and • Indoor sports group of indoors semi-public • Faality for partiapants .Facility for playground recreation and • Private clubs recreational activity amusement Staff researched the North American Industrial Classification System' used by the federal government The most similar land use classification found was '713120 Amusement Arcade -establishments primarily engaged in operating amusement (except gambling, billiard, or pool) arcades and parlors " Parking A related issue, and important consideration, is whether adequate parking as available in industrial protects for commeraal use This issue speaks to the "big picture" question of whether this type of commercial use belongs in the industrial area Warehouse industrial use regwres 1 parking space per 1,000 square feet, Manufacturing requires 2/1,000 square feet, and Multi-Tenant Industrial regwres 2 5/1,000 square feet Commercial requires at least double the parking as industrial at a ratio of 4 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet for general retail and up to 1/100 square feet for places of assembly 1 North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) has replaced the U S Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) system The NAICS classifies all businesses into thousands of speafic categories The NAICS was developed tointly by the United States, Canada, and Mexico and is implemented by a variety of federal agencies Available online at www census gov/epcd/www/Waits html ~3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00002 -ALL ABOUT FUN LLC January 26, 2005 Page 4 (e g ,restaurants) and 1/75 square feet for private clubs The Development Code has no speafic standard for family entertainment centers The applicant has not submitted a parking study of other similar businesses to determine an appropriate parking ratio, or to demonstrate offset peak parking demand hours Although this Use Determination is not a site-specific analysis, a closer look at parking within the applicant's proposed site highlights the issue The applicant's letter indicates that they anticipate up to 120 people (children and adults), plus 8 employees, attending parties at any given time in their facility The approved plans indicate a total of 271 parking spaces will be provided and 267 spaces were required by Code (based upon multi-tenant industnal as the primary use) The 4 extra parking spaces are distributed throughout the entire protect The applicant's intended business location is allocated only 14 parking spaces, 8 of which would be used by employees, leaving only 6 parking spaces available for 120 people Although it is reasonable to assume that a certain, unknown, percentage of parents would drop-off their children, this does not fully resolve the parking issue Likewise, one of the proposed activities, "corporate power lunches" is marketed at local businesses The most compelling justification would be to limit hours to evenings (after 6 00 p m) and weekends when other tenants are not open This "shared parking" concept may be considered under the City's regulations subject to a parking study and a written agreement In conclusion, staff believes that the use is most similar to Recreation Facilities because it provides facilities and play egwpment for individual or group sports challenge, and table games for amusement RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine the use to be classified as "Recreation Facilities" through adoption of the attached Resolution with findings Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB DC/Is Attachments Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Draft Reso - Application/Business DescnpUon - Inflatable Play Equipment Pictures - Other Family Entertainment Centers - Subarea 8 Location Map - Land Use Regulations for Subarea 8 ution for Use Determination DRC2005-00002 E~`7" SKEEKAMO'S • ALL ABOUT FUN LLC 5652 MORNING CYN WAY ALTA LOMA, CA 91737 909-484-5466 December 22, 2004 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DR RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN, My name is Charles Morello and my wife's name is Betsy, We aze Rancho Cucamonga residents and we are seeking "Use Deterntinahon "and approval for our Family onemed and Family Intenchve Center Being residents with several children and Grandchildren n has come to our attenhon along with our School and Church contacts that there is a real lack of Faintly onemed places in our city for Family's to go and have fun The chokes in our city are Chuck E Cheese and Deer Creek Lanes One is too crowded and the is not a good place for Ktd's After attending a Buthday patty for a daughter of some very close fnends at a sunilar type business In the city of Placentia named "Scooters Jungle " n dawned on us that this would be a great and viable business • Our city and would fulfill a need for family fun Thts concept is flounshing around our great state and country and would be a great asset to the city of Rancho Cucamonga and it's residents Sincerely Charles & Betsy repo ~ u~N E~ January 6,2005 Dan Coleman Principal Planner 10500 Civic Center Dr. JA~J 0 6 ~G~S ~~~~ - ~ ~~'nJING _ ., ~J~D ~Ni-st~~~ ,~ ~ - Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 CQQZ 9 ~ t~tlf Subject: Use Determination DRC2005-00002 - Skeekamos ~ v ~N~ -10 ~~~ Dear Mr. Coleman, I hope that the following information that we have provided for you will more accurately explain our reasons for the choice that we have made about the type of business and the location. Below we will try to answer the question that you posed to us in the attached letter. First of as far as the use category and why we believe our business is consistent with the land use definition for that category. Why we selected the property we did, and why we believe we are compatible with industrial businesses. After speaking Dan Coleman it was suggested that we request to be put into the category of recreation. As far as why, well fast this would be appropriate since most of the time spent with us would be in our inflatable. (maze, slide and bouncer) They would also have the option to play ping pong, fooze ball and air hockey. Due to the height requirement for our inflatable we need a minim of 18 feet to 24 feet, that was hard to find in anything other than a warehouse. The property that we are in the process of leasing is in an area that is zoned for recreation and entertainment. This would cover both aspects of our business. It also seems to comply with the criteria that we have to fmd a place that would be safe and accessible for the major part of our business which would be children. I have in the past been involved with gymnastics that were in a warehouse off of Jersey in the City of Rancho Cucamonga I believe our location is a little safer than that one was due to the fact that we would be in a Business Park that will also have Retail Locations. Our location is at the end and they enter from an area that would not have a lot of traf5c. I believe our businesses are somewhat similar as far as both of them serviced mostly children, they had equipment for the children to play on and workout on, we too have equipment for them to play on. -~ C J • What are the proposed hours of operation? Our plan is to make ourselves available to fit into our clients scheduling. Our proposed hours will be from 10:00am to 10:00pm 7 days a week until we get established and then we maybe able to cut back a little bit. This would depend on the amount of parties and fundraisers we have booked. We would also like to be able to make time to give something back to the community such as inviting the mothers from the House of Ruth, or any other single parents organization that would not be able to participate in something like this without a little help. I would also like to do something for Make a Wish since I am personally involved with some people that have benefited from them. We will have at least one night a week for Family Fun Night or Pizza Party. The rest would depend on our bookings for the evenings. How many children, family and friends would attend parties at any given time? Our hopes would be the maximum allowed which would be 25 kids and 22 adults with the mazi®uns otti0 peepk. That would be per room. This number would change with fundraisers that could possibly go as high as 350 which I mentioned when I spoke with Moises Eskenazi. These would take place in the evening so as not to bother the other tenants. If parking became a problem on these night we would make some kind of arrangements for them to park some place else. What is the maximum number of employees in the building at any given time? The amount of employees would depend on the type of activity we have planned. There will be 3 employees per party per room and 1 float person along with someone from management that would be there at all times. When we Gave our fundraisers then the amount of employees would depend on the size that we were expecting, since we would do presale wristbands we would have a pretty good idea so that we could staff accordingly. How will the two open space rooms be used? The rooms labeled open space are the rooms that were listed in the Business Plan as the arenas. These rooms would each have an inflatable maze, slide and bouncer or something that is age appropriate. There will also be the table games that we spoke about earlier. The area labeled conference will be the rooms that the guest go into after they are finished in the arenas. They go in this room to have any food that they may have provided and to open presents. The bullpen area is where they check-in, tum in their completed waivers and then we go over our safety rules before we allow them to enter the arena. E-'~ How many parking spaces? We are assigned 14 parking spaces because of our square footage. We also checked with the landlord and they assured us that they had 90 unassigned spaces. Due to the fact most of our business caters to children under the age 13, most of them would be dropped off and picked up after the party. Also most of our business will take place after 6:OOpm and on the weekends. Will we be cooking? We have made arrangements with Dalai's Pizza to supply the food that is requested from the guest. We will offer pizza and drinks upon prior request. We will also offer catering if they would prefer by local caters. I hope that the above information will answer all the questions that you may have. C~ Upon your advice I contracted Moises Eskenazi, Senior Plans Examiner (fire). He recommended that I contact an architect, so I will be meeting with an architect that I have used in the past on Tuesday Januaryll, at Rancho City Hall. That way we could meet with Fire and Building Safety to make sure we are able to comply with everything that is needed from us. . In case you could not tell we are very excited to get this business started, other than the fact that we are now aware that since we first started this journey we now seem to have picked up some competition. We know that there are plenty of children out there to support more than one of these locations, we would however like to be one of them. Due to the fact that we are residents of this community and have seen the great things that city does for the community we would not have considered putting Skeekamos any place else. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, ~~ ~/L~~ Chuck and Betsy Morello All about Fun LLC/Skeekamos Enc/bm C -~ 5:3:3:3 -~:i.~l ~ocxrsTrR ~~~-r~t-r ~~ 119G(i - 11~9G .7.~Ch I3E\\~" llRI~"E. • Professtonal Business Park Envtrottment Located Between I-15 Fwy and Quakes Stadium • Excellent Vtstbthty & Access • Umt Stzes Ranging From 11,400 to (25,000 SF • 10%-40% of Class "A" Office Area Provided 18' to 24' Mtttimum Cleaz Height • Calculated Fire Sptutkler Systems • 1 Ground Level Loading Door Per Umt • 1 Dock High Loading Door Per Umt (Bolding 2) 100 to 400 Amp 277/480 Volt Electncal Sernce (expandable) • 2.0 per 1,000 SF Pazking Skylights • Abundant Surrounding Retail & Cotttmerctal Amemhes • Adjacent to the New Vtctona Gazdens Regional Mall, Foothill Crossings Shopping Center, Mast Plaza Shopping Center & The Foothill Commercial Comdor -~ _ _ eR]nChO CUCbROfI$i c _ i e _~__._- _- +€i9 a - s -- ; Cmc C ~ -- -~ `.eRO.„ tae _- - - ~ut~-- - - - - $ ~uF" -o-n a $ Jersey 8tvd _ ____ t~ 5 &h st, `f i 7th 51 $ ~e ~ ~ ,~ Lekes ~ ~,~ ; _a 7m S_ B[h SI Goli _~ ~` c course v t,~ ~ Tn f. 6 d =j~ a L ~ ~~ N az Gcle ~(~ S ~ o.-. a i O m~ ~ ~ OrRarro MiAS ;~~ ~„~ ° ' "" ,pky ^ ~ o ~Nerro hQS For more Info Contact Chris Atkinson & Craig McKenzie (888)305-1330 ~" Chris@thebatescompan,~com or Craig@thebatescompany.com u Craig McKenzie `• Cra~gQTheBatesCompairv com Chris Atkinson ChnsQT6eBatesCompatry com ' (888) 305-1330 Phone (62~ 305-1342 Fax ti ~ L ~) rJ J ~~~~ ~ ~i~ Y. ~~ - ~i -i, v i -4 _~ x ~' 4 --" ~ rn - s .. _- r .. - ~. y - ' ^ r ' -~~ '~ _1 ~F-----i ~r '.~...; I~w~j^ G° Z7 ;; Q o; ~ ~ • ~-- !~ 4I ~~ --„ ; ~L_ 1 "~ ,r-- -- ~S C '~ ; -% '~ ~~ _; i,; ~e F S#~ j 3 j ~I ' ~ - ' --'--t-~ ~-ri ' E',~/, ,._._. - ~_..J; i ---may: ~ '' C~ ---• A BBC D; E FIG,H~I~J ~ __ '' ,- ;- ~ ! i =; ,_ _ _ . ~~ ~~~ . ,. ~ ~ ~ a~ --~ F w • 04 ~~ 0 ~~i ~ N~~~ ~ ~1 ~ b~ -~.- Skeekamo's -All About Fun LLC I Executive Summary All About Fun LLC is ready to launch the Inland Empires premiere family oriented fun center right m the heart of the premiere city of Rancho Cucamonga Skeekamo's a state of the art family entertainment center will have a market that ~s virtually busting at the seams Serving Rancho Cucamonga's residents and the adJommg cores of Ontazio.Fontana,Upland and Corona the future growth of this viable endeavor will be incredible The indoor Inflatable arena centers around our great state of California and the United States are thriving One such center m the city of Placient~a Scooter's Jungle Is booked 6 months in advanced for parties and fundraiser's In our city of Rancho Cucamonga there are only a few places to take the family for family entertainment or have a private party, One is Chuck "E" Cheese and the other is Deer Creek Lanes 1.1 Business Opportunity Skeekamo's ~s a indoor Inflatable activity azena The Inflatable's come in different formats. 22' htgh Shdes, 60' long Obstacle courses, Bounce houses, and a full size Jousting arena. The Building that houses Skeekamo's will have a front office and reception area and the remaining area is drnded into two arena areas Each area will house mflatable's and non coin operated table games such as Air Hockey, Basketball and Football Toss, Foosball and Bean Bag toss games A Rock Chmbmg wall will also be included m the hst of attracUOns The operation functions several ways, either a room is rented for a private party such as a birthday party, fundraiser or corperate parry or there is open admission. The arena areas will have a square footage of around 11,000 sq feet That's one big play ground ~ .There ~s not a s~mdar type facility any where in the proposed area The population m Rancho and the surrounding cities would support more than one Skeekamo's will be the first and only in this area. Time is of the essence, we have to be up and running to take advantage of the market area 1.2 ProducUService Description A fun family activity center that both children and their pazents will enJoy at a reasonable value Family interaction comes easy with the activities that Skeekamo's offers. Our market is family's, Schools, Church and corperations. Indoor amusement on a large scale is the competitive advantage Skeekamo's will have over Chuck "E" Cheese and any other venues in the area 1.3 Current Business Position Skeekamo's is owned and will be operated by All About Fun LLC All About Fun LLC was Incorporated m December of 2004 Chuck Morello a 25 yeaz veteran of the retail and wholesale Auto industry and his wife Betsy Morello will be at the helm of Skeekamo's Betsy has a long history of both PTA and School affiliation. Chuck and Betsy Morello are the only shareholders m All About Fun LLC 1.4 Financial Potential All About Fun LLC expects to have a first year revenue of $~ dollars The • E-ia Skeekamo's -All About Fun LLC ~ ant~crpated amount of pre-tax profit should be $~ dollars With the existing population in the area we should be maximum capacity as far a business we could handle Wnhm our second year of operatron 1.5 The Request The budding that we have selected we believe will serve the need of our company and the community Skeekamo's will have sufficient capRal and own their egmpment The debt owed to Mr and Mrs Morello from All About Fun LLC rs m essence non existent because the Morello's are the only shareholders Most of the revenue rs aarved out of service and not inventory the company will be more or less debt free rr~ ~-!3 Skeekamo's -All Abour Fun LLC 3 2. The Industry, Competition and Market As Rancho Cucamonga residents we recognize the need for a facility such as Skeekamo's The area that we live is growing by leaps and bounds and is one of the top growth cities m the country Unfortunately recreation for family's has not kept up with the pace Skeekamo's ~s both innovative and will be successful m our city The same type venues m other crt~es are doing excellent and we have no competition in the area The family entertainment area is VOry limited m our city and will help further the our success 2.1 Industry Definition ~ The best definition of the type of business that Skeekamo's would fall under would be entertairunent since are activity's include Inflatable items and table type games 2.2 Primary Competitors We have no pnmary competitors m our mazket area 2.3 Market Size Our market area ~s amazing. As per the U.S Bureau of the Census and the Department Of Commerce figures for 2003 Rancho Cucamonga's population has grown from 101,409 people to 151,640 since 1990. The total market area that includes Rancho, Fontana, Ontario, Upland and Corona has grown from 461,440 to 685,439 The most dramatic growth ~s our neighbonng city of Fontana from 87,535 to 151,903 In our primary market area there are over 100 Elementary schools with a enrollment of over 65000 Students and 18 JR Highs with a enrolment of 7,200 students Out of a population of 685,409 at least . 50 to 60% is our impact market 2.4 Market Growtb The market has grown 33% since 1990 The ma~or~ty of people that have moved into our area are famtly's The growth was 223,999 people m the penod between 1990 and 2003. We do not have figures for 2003 to 2004 but the mdicat~on is that growth is still continuing from Real Estate transactions on new homes in the area 2.5 Customer Profile Our customer profile is all children under the age of 16, School and Churches for Fundraising and the general public ~~ L~ -~`i - All About Fun LLC I 3. Marketing Plan Our marketing plan is not very complex. Community awareness will play the biggest roll m establishing our business Getting our name out there and showing the public what we have to offer is what is needed The plan for the first 90 days of operation ~s to use cable television, local newspapers and direct mail School PTA'S and local Churches wdl be visited by a representative to secure a date for their fundraising activity We have a generous plan that will earn up to 50% of attendance proceeds, NOBODY offers [hat ~ . We also have a achievement program for students that have good grades The motif of Skeekamo's is alungle theme, Skeekamo is a Zebra that will be featured m all cable and pant ads This character wdl be appealing to children and adults alilce We also wdl have a Iungle Zebra stnped high profile vehicle that will be involved m corrunumty functions and will not only promote Skeekamo's but also will promote great grades in School and the dangers of Drug abuse We also offer outside rentals of Inflatable for commercial promotion and public use Both facets of our business will be able to accessed through phone contact and the Internet 3.1 Competitive Advantage Our pricing will be based on the going rate that similar type operations have The mazket m our area may support a higher price but for the first year we will have to more or less test the water and see how our pncmg works out If indeed that a higher pace can be charged we may consider ra~smg them although volume is more attractive to us 3.2 Pricing Guest pricing will be as follows see addendum 1. ~~~5 Addendum 1. 1. Parties -Weekdays .S~/Weekends .$~ Pace lndudes use ojl Arena area for I hour artd 45 minules plus 45 rmnu(es In the cortjerence room jor cake And Rejreshmenls Standard paper goods mduded for 50 Gues[ Theme style goods avadable of a extra charge Charges jor ova SO Cuots arc chddren ~ ea /aduKs Sea. Reservadons requLed 1 1. Open Play -Weekdays - S~ per hr or $~ jor 3hrs Aduks and C/uld prlca 3. Mommy & Me -Weekdays Tues thru Thurs $~ per child Parent(s) free 4. School & Church Fundraiser - $~ per wristband 6 -10 PM Manmum 400 people - Foal d Refreshment' m a eava charge S. Corporate Power Lunches - $~per room charge 3 hrs Carereefood m addlaond charge 6. Summer Camp - $~ per child 3hr Session /sock 6 Craftmdudtd-Ages 611 anty 7. Holiday Camp - S~ per child 3hr Session Lunch d Croft Lsdlyde4 Ages 671 oMy. 8. Grad Night - S~ per student IOPM - 6AM Fapdry and Chaperones free 9. Additional Items, PiZZa -Sane rapping / liter soda nlduded Goodie Bags - smadare s`ea -Deluxe ,yea Theme Party Goods - sir esba ch~ge T-Shirts - chudxea s~ w Balloons - sA ea 10. Rentals - Standard Bounce House $~per day Theme Bounce House $~ per day Small Slide $~ er day Super Slide .$~per day Obstacle Course $~per day Water Super Slide ,$~per day 11. Company Rentals Bounce Houses $~ per weekend Wind People Simper weekend ea Giant Inflatable $~per week , 2 week min Red Tag, Animal, Dollar Sign, Sale, Uncle Sam, Fireman • Pncrs subled to change ~ G ~ /~ 's -All Abow Fun LLC 4. Operating Plan Skeekamo's will operate m 1361 I square ft bwldmg at the new Stadmm Plaza Business Park located at 8333 Rochester avenue m the crty of Rancho Cucamonga Day to day operations wdl be supervised by Betsy A Morello Vice President and General Manager The employee head count will be 8 full time and 10 part ume posmons We will also have a manager to supervise and schedule employes It ~s our intent to hire as many College And High School students as possible We belrve that ~f a student has great grades they should have the opportunity for employment All prospective applicants shall be subject to background checks and drug testing 4.1 Location Skeekamo's location will be at the new Stadmm Business Park located at 8333 Rochester ave m the city of Rancho Cucamonga The excellent location is across from Quake Stadnim and next to the Rancho Sports Park Located dust south of Foothill blvd and near the new Victoria Gardens mall The Facilty wdl be v~sable from Rochester ave and is freeway close 4.2 Facility The inside Arena areas of the building will be carpeted and have dug out style benches and tables The front office will be used for admm~stratton and a Reception area The inside of the building wdl be decorated with a bungle motif The budding will be leased and not owned by All About Fun LLC -Skeekamo's 4.3 Operating Equipment All About Fun LLC will have to secure the following items for operation I Inside Inflatable Units ($~) 2 Building improvements such as interior decoration and carpet for the azena azeas 3Table games ($~) 4 Vending (r~ 5 Fixtures, Office furniture and Stadmm benches ($~) 6 Supphes(~ 4.4 Suppliers and Vendors Sampling list of our suppliers l Xtreme Inflatables/Bouncers 2 Costco Wholesale 3 Oriental Trading Company 4 Blake Paper Co ~~~' Skeekamo's -All About Fun LLC 6 5 Staples 6 Belson Outdoors 7 Vending Machines Unhmeted 8 Toy Wiz coin 9 Startrack 10 All Plush coin I 1 Promotional Items INC 4.5 Personnel Plan Staffing for the operation includes the two maJonty share holders Charles J Morello And Betsy A Morello Compensation for the Morello's will be per year Our manager wdl recieve $~per month and all hourly workers will rec~eve $~ per hour 4.6 General Operations Skeekamo's operattng hours wtll be as follows Monday thru Friday 10 OOAM to 10 OOPM Saturday 9 OOAM to 10.OOPM Sunday 10 OOAM to 9 OOpm ~-~8 _~ ,`- • ~xa_ ~L I __ _ ~ 1 ~~ m~ c1 is x° m, -sr E ~ ~ ~ ,.:r' °iS~ /~'p`~-'~„a=Y.~ Y ~~~~i ~N~,,,4f' Qy~~ 'tax i~sc ~Y " ^s . ~ . ^~~ T I~ ~ ~,~ . m ,~ t.~ ~u~ _k. ~,a.. _ ~-~'... b ~~~ i d ~-t , .i he /`°-'~ C°, r-t.,~qr`"'~',~-'}z.. - P. >: : ~ 3 ,'- '~ _,- `M {~',~tiF +`~ k':;+ q . - ~~ s g'b' ~f ~ a - -, _. -. ~ ~'` `,..,_ _ .k- :' ~ ~, ~ ~ "" ;- .~ ~„ ~ .-- 3.+ ". ~ >w'Lef , _ 0.i# 5 icyp-~ ,.. _ ~ ~.. ~ - ~./~S~'i.-~G ~UfV,t' tL ~LP ~~ . ~e^f ~;' ~ ~ ` ~'~ try{'Y~r ~ -' ' ~ ,firs ~, '',..;tom : •+,yo d - `~11 J' ~ : E , ~ ~`'''"`a l _ " '. ~^:~~~ i~r~r z _ ~'Y ~+'~t~y~~X.}2"-~i .`. "~, - ..V i ..• ~ «..~+~s'F -w~?`t~'^~~{D t~f3~~lu~ ;'~~ "'w's^'~; i.'~~ ` ~,, .a` ~'_crr~....L.+-~,ra,..y.~,.-rt'f^~( y(.~.,..p~~~~~.~ -S. ~ s }»' ,x~-'f.~i' -.~ ~I. C ~ ~' ~ .4 ~• r 'mac '~'`t Gff--, ~" Y5' - _ _ ~ _ _ ~~..~. - _ ~ •, Ss i _ .. _ _ f" ~.y,.. _ ~„ a._ , - - ~' ~C''• - O•Y• m . -= ~> " /f ~~ , i -,,;,rte- -~. ~, ~ ~+[, [n~~i ?~~ _~ ~~r sF _ 4.1~-tyv„r ~ pL3'-'~r~ ~`f~- y .. x ~,-.,r. ~ ~ *~='s- .$ ~_`~:~a-'r-~""~j-(~.~~, Ott- x a a.' " ,(~`~ aT f-yi _ , t~ ~ Y ~ 't~'~"~ ``~..a. X11 ~ ~.3 bF~aa r ~°~ l :r`+` ~ -i`/ \\ 1, ~ ,) (~~ '" ,.G.e ~i(~ t ~ ni~~`N.zt--y °, .k" ~t.~ bi"- ~~. A. ~, ~''~E,.''~` ,L r +z."' ho. au'1.3xw,,''r^ ~ ~~j~L~ 3r~t ~"m _r`-:z..-'~'.~rf, ~~~ hJ s,~~~~Y - .. .. ~~ .-' .Yiy-~.'~°`k~J y~at~~..-' ,;_ ~, t'`~ 4 b y ., •~,~. w ~~ ~? r x moo. .Yd y i ` ~ER. ~'+Gj1~'IV~F ~~'~. .~ ., 4}Y` fi ~ ~ ~• LrY l , ~GEa` R~ASE4~A1.1. . t4- -_'~~'- ~;' ~. F~AS1=E'CR.,Ati1- GHAI.E.ENGE -. . _ :~ , ~~ >~'`_ t f~ • ~ m 1 _~ .. C:tFlA1:'(.ENGE S, ~.G~ Lake Forest -Pump It Up Party • Page 1 of 2 r R st. - ~i 'fir" ~~ ~~~ ~ ' I~ '~ '~ 1t Q How many guests can I invite ~} A 25 kids plus 1 birthday child Kids under 24 months and anyone over the age of 18 can come and pia free and are not considered as part of the 26 guests 11 Q What if I have more than 25 kids ~l A you will be charged 510 per extra kid over the 26 allowed This rs because it rs discourage because c party room can only seat 25 kids and it will be very crowded and uncomfortable for your guests it Q Will there be someone in the party room to serve my cake/pizza/etc~ .i A No Once you enter [he party room, you will be responsible for serving yourselves We will clean up I you tr Q Can I bang confetti or hang streamersz ~ A Because we have gone to great expense to professionally decorate our party rooms, we ask that no[ be hung on the walls Also, no confetti or silly stung will be allowed If you use them, you may be subject 525 clean-up fee A Q Can I bring in my own food ~ A NO Tne only food you CAN bang m is cake, dunks chips (NO OIP) and canev Absolutely no other outside food may be brought in } Q Can I have alcohol for the adul[s~ ~- A No alcohol rs allowed m our chdtlren's faan[y 11 Q When do you need to know my head count if I am ordering pizza, balloons or goodie bags ~I A We wdl automatically calf you the night before your party At that time we expect you to have a fma headcount The pizza company requires our orders [he night before Please use the phone numbers on Un flyers provided fi Q What if less/more kids show up on the day of the party after I have placed my pizza, balloons or goodybag order .I A For pizza once you give us your numbers the nigh[ before, your order has been placed and cannot b changetl on the day o1 your party You will be charged for whatever number of kids you gwe us For yood bags, however, you will only be charged for the amount of goodie eggs used, se approx headcount is oka You may also bring your own goodie bags or balloons R Q How much does a large and medium pizza feed for the adults and what about their drinks ¢ A A large comes cu[ into 16 slices and a medmm comes cut into 12 slices SY rs up to you [o determine many adults you think you wdl have and how many pizzas you want for them We wdl box up any leftover fer you to take home at [he end of your party Usually there are enough drinks leftover from the kids' 2 li' that are free, or you can nnng/order more f Q Can I order just large/med Dizzas for the kids too ~I A No You have to pav the 52 95~4id pnw for their pizza That will mclutle 2 slices end a onnk for eact cn 'd Then, after you order for the kids, we are able to gwe Yoa the adult disco,. n: price +or pizza tr Q Why do we have to put 15 minutes time sooner than our party actually starts on our invrtations~ ~} A Se your guests have a 15 minute window to arrve That wav ah of your ea rty :vdl ce [here when rt re time fog your party to start, tc hear the rules and get your Childs' full play ti rt:e f Q, How early should I arrive before my party • A You should arrive a[ the same Ume as what yeu put on your rnwtabons Thee is arvothei pa rtv in ou raollty so arnvme early wdi make rc mtfe rence It is best tc have as tittle time as possible for the kids tc need tona~t ~~ ~~ t Q Can I bring my own decorations, paper products in myself and set them up before my party"+ ~i A VJe provide plates, forks, cup and napk•ns flee of charge, however, the} a•e eenenc It you would h4 G bn~5 Fou; ovJn Vaoer produ: s, you -nay do so E al http.//www pumpltupparty.com/lffaq.html 11 /9/2004 Forest -Pump It Up Party Yage ~ of ~ 1i Q What else do I need to bang in besides my take> .Y A A ..-ake knife, candles, matches & dunks ~' you are not having p¢za tI Q Does each guest need a separate waiver even if they are in the same family> .~ A No Ail famdy members can be on the same waiver We have extras at the oauding .n case someone forgets theirs yc Q What else should I bring to my party> .h A You are regmretl to wear socks so please remember to Dung a pair We hope you enjoy your Pump It Up party. Thanks so much for allowing us to be part of your child's spec dayli Cilck here for printable version of this pag°_ Need more information? Give us a call! ~VV7~ ~/~~~1~ ~DI~i~~i4'~i~ ~~ Copyright ©2002 PIU Management, LLC C as C.~ 'www pumpltupparty com/lffaq html 11 /9/2004 Huntington Beach - YLlmp It Up Yarty RL"AN!;YO U Rye' ,~-~ N EXT~P.ARTY! v ~ ~~ ~ _ `~, ~~I~~I '~ $ Two Party Plans to accommodate (almost) any time, age or budget! CLASSIC PARTY ' ~ Invite up to 25 fnends~ ~, (parents can stay, too) ~'~, 1r 1-1/2 hours in the supervised party arena '. 1r 1/2 hour m the fully-decorated party room * Great Sound System -Popular Music 1r FREE Full-Color Invitations 1r FREE Paper plates, cups, napkins and forks sr Socks are requved to play 1r $215 00 Mondays thru Thursdays f $255 00 Friday thru Sunday and Holidays SCHOOL-TIME PARTY tt Invite up to 14 friends (parents can stay, tooq f I hour in our supervised Darty arena f 1/2 hour in our fully-decorated party room ~r Great Sound System -Popular Music f FREE Full-Color Invitations 1r FREE paper plates, Cups, napkins and forks 1r Socks are required [o play $150 00 Monday thru Friday between 9 AM and 3 PM only ccludes all school holidays and vacation Ask about our Party Options: Delivered Pizza and Soda $2 95 per person (2 slices each) Goodie Bags with assorted noveit~es and candy - $2 50 per bag Colorful Helium Balloons 12 for $10 or 26 for $20 I~J~' ~~~~~l~ ~Ll~~l~~ ~~~ Copynght ©2002 PIU Management, LLC E a3 Yage 1 oI L http //www.plunpltupparty.com/hbpncing html 11/9/2004 Brentwood -Pump It Up Party Yd~'C 1 Ul L N R 57 Y! _~ Ire ~~ ~ ~ Two Party Plans to accommodate (almost) any time, age or budget! CLASSIC PARTY f Invite up to 25 fnends~ (parents can stay, [oo~) f 40 minutes in each (2) supervised party 40 minutes in the fully-decorated party and t rooms Great Sound System -Popular Music FREE Full-Color Invitations FREE Paper plates, cups, napkins and forks Socks are required to play f $199 00 Mondays th ru Thursdays f $249 00 Fnday thru Sunday and holidays FAMILY PLAYTIME SESSIONS f Mondays & Thursdays from 9 30-llam for $4/child over 24mo, $2/child under 24mo f Also on Tuesday evenings from 6 30-Bpm for all ages f One parent must stay with the child f No reservations required f Everyone must wear SOCKS f No party room time, no birthday parties f Socks are required to Dlay MINI CLASSIC PARTY f Monday -Fnday before 2 00 Dm • Invite up to 14 friends ;parents can stay, [oo~) f 1 hour in our supervised party arena f 1/2 hour In our fully-decorated party room f Great Sound System -Popular Musics • FREE Full-Color Invitations • FREE paper plates, cups, napkins and forks f Socks are required to play f $150 00 Monday [hru Friday between f 9 AM and 3 PM only (excludes all school holidays and vacation days) PLAY TIME f Play time (one hour play no party room) f Monday -Fnday before 2 00 pm f 30 minutes in each (2) supervised party f Mom's and Dad's IumD for free f Reservation is regwred f Socks are required to play $99 00 Ask about our Party Options: http•//www ptunpitupparty.com/brpncmg.html Delivered Pizza and Soda $2 95 per person (2 slices each) Goodie Bags with assorted novelties and candy - $2 95 per bag ~-a~/ 11 /9/2004 Lake forest - Yump It Up Party R N ~~~ ~~ rape 1 ul ~ Y fT ~.,"~. Party Plans to accommodate (almost) any time, age or budget) ~J r CLASSIC PARTY A Invite up to 25 friendsi (parents can stay, tool) ~t I-1/2 hours in the supervised party arena j1r 1/2 hour m the fully-decorated party room I7t Great Sound System -Popular Mused * FREE Full-Color Invitations 1r FREE Paper plates, cups, napkins and forks 1t Socks are requred to play tr Weekday Classic Party $225 00 Mondays through Thursdays tr Weekend Classic Party $265 00 Friday, Saturday, Sunday and National Holidays MOM, DAD AND ME • Every Tuesday & Wednesday 10-11 30 AM, ring the school year $8 for first child, $6 for 2nd child in same oily No charge for crawlers Mom's and Dad's are free No charge for iwlers No reservation required Socks are required to play Reserve your own time for you and your mds, lust ask us for details See Holiday Program to the right 'A Invte up to 15 kidsi (parents can stay,[ooi) 1c 1 hour in our supervised party arena yc 1/2 hour in our fully-decorated party room tt Great Sound System -Popular Musics • FREE Full-Color Invitations f FREE Paper plates, cups, napkins and forks tr Socks are required to play f Can be booked -- Monday through Friday 9 30 AM up to 2 30 PM Or Mon - Thur after 6 PM -- Does not including national holidays 7i $180 00 PLAYTIME w gam to loam play time for ages 5 and under lust $6 for first child and $4 for second child in same family, parents stay and play 1r 'h day camp for ages 5 and older s[artng from Bam and going td lpm $6 per hour or $5 per hour for two or more hours fi Full day tamp that includes SOLiD ROCK GYM from $30 to $45 per day depending on '[he hours attended ~1r Socks regwred to play ft Dates Nov 22, 23, 24 & 26, Dec 20 ~[hrough 24, Dec 27 through 31 FUNDRAISERS f Trying to raise money for your group, school or church Rent out our facility for a nominal fee and the remaining profits go to your group Call Pump It Up for information at (949) 588-2925 Ask about our Party Options: Delivered Pizza and Soda $2 95 per person (2 slices each) C as http //www.ptunpltupparty com/lfpnctng.html 11/9/2004 iiQML Scooter's Jungle Recommended for ages 5 8 up Weekday 8 Weekend Parties are 2'/z hour partles for up to 22 kids & 20 adults Party Includes 15 minute check-in/safety beefing, 1 '/z hours In the arena, & 45 minutes in the party room, leaving time for opening gifts on the throne Specialty Parties are 1 hour, 45 min & are for up to 14 kids & 16 adults Party includes 15 min check-In/safety briefing, 1 hour In the arena, & 30 min In the party room Gift opening not Included WEEKDAY PARTIES ...........................$230 Monday -Thursday, plus Fnday until 2pm sfart WEEKEND PARTIES ...........................$270 Fnday from 2 30pm start, Sat, Sun. & holidays SPECIALTY PARTIES ........................$775 (MOntlay - Fntlay 9 30am - 2 30pm start bme) Also (Monday - Thursday 6 45pm start bme) NOTE Pames include custom invite flyers, rental time, staffing, antl paper goods For all pames, 2 staff members will assrst 1 m arena, 1 in party room Children under 2 are not incuded rn the above counts Diseounffi offered for Scouts, Indian Gurdes, Pnneesses 8 Team Parties! Yage 1 of G Recommended for ages under 6 Weekday 8 Weekend Parties are 2 '/. hour parties for up to 22 kids and 20 adults Party Includes 15 minute check-In/safety briefing, and 2 hours in the arena/party room, leaving time for opening gifts on the throne WEEKDAY PARTIES ...........................$230 Monday -Thursday, plus Fnday until 2pm start WEEKEND PARTIES ...........................$270 Fnday from 2 30pm start, Saturday, Suntlay & holidays NOTE Pames mGude custom invde fryers, rental bme, staffing for enbro party, antl paper goods For all pames, 1 staff member wrll assist Children untler age 7 are not included in the above counts Discounts offered for Scouffi, Indian Guides, Princesses & Team Parties! Host may bring dry snacks, drinks, one platter of fruit, e, ,r-- one platter of veggies, cold dtp (up to 30oz.), ~¢~'"_ ' cakeldessert, balloons, and gift bags. Or choose from ~ `<~t~"-~- °s, ='~ , our great options below. ~ ~~_~. ` PIZZA /~' a http://www scootersjungle.com/avparty.htm 11/5/2004 • (~Lr 1 V1 ,~ u i From Marin: - North on Hwy 101 - Take the Bicentennial Exit (head west on overpass) - Right onto Range Ave - Left onto Piner Road - Right onto Coffey Lane. a~ ~l~ ttp://www.partyinteractive com/adventurewne.html 11/15/200 ~-~~ S~ ~ ~~ i~ ~' 1'J JJ wr>ho-ru-r -sirdm •I.bh MFR _ Imo..: 6 cna~,u f Plea Ra 1'. Steele U 4uaem0e Re ^Wna, PaaLC<w iv cmin•-•L z - o e&ta~'n116,p IiJia~ `R (NSaNa Ren _ e 3 ~O .T.- ~R a IDI •_ ;?~:sP:c Y,"r -~, `..+~ ._ Win. .C s.t.7. ~"' 3320 Coffey Lane Santa Rosa, Ca 95407 Phone: 707-528-7529 ~_ ~1 ~•, 1~i d- ', ToVrher Dr ~ ',o \r Sansone Dr ~ -` _ ~ ~] -- •, d p~na~ Fz - ,l~ From Santa Rosa: - West on Piner Road - Right onto Coffey Lane - Look for our Sign Local in Santa Rosa From Napa: 30 -45 minutes West from Napa County -West to Hwy 101 30 -45 minutes North from Mann County - 9o North or South to Bicentennial Exit (head west on overpass) - Right onto Range Ave, Left onto - Piner Road, Right onto Coffey Lane. ~6111LiJ-~11LVl4VL~....r_i~.n+W1lMJ~ 11.. ~1 n1n~4L4V1~. aJ, T 1~ O~~ -a8 S ~0 r 'L i ~1 it t i!f ][TQa~~ I t i i~ d g. ~ r ~0:~11, li {~ Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17 30 030 Table 17.30.030 -Use Regulations for Industrial Districts SUMMARY OF LAND USE TYPE BY SUBAREA ~J LAND USE IP GI GI GI GI GI IP IP GI MVHI GI GI IP GI GI HI IP IP MUIOS USE TYPES SUBAREAS HO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 MANU FAC TU RI NG Custom P P P P P P P P P P P P P C P Light P P P P P P P P P P P P P C P Medum C C C P P' C P P P P P P Hoary p Mirnmum Impact Heavy OFFICE PROFESSIONAL, D ES IGN & RE SE A C P P Z Admm~stretrve & Office P P P P P P P C P C C P P J ProfesswnaVDesign Services P P P P P P P C P C C P P d Research Servces P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P V WHOLESALE, STORAGE, & DISTRIBITTION LL Public Storage C C P C C P C C C C P W Ught P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P a Medium C P P C P P' P P P P P P P N Hoary C P C P ~ MATERIALS RECOVERY FACILITIES Q W Collection Facilaies P P P P P P P P P P P P ~ Processmg Factlmes C C C C C C C C Screp Operetion u1 CIV IC p AdmmisVahve Civic Services p p p p p p p p P p p p p f' Conventwn Centers C C C Culture) P C C P C C W Day Cere Facility C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C Emergency Shelter C C C C EMensrve Impact Uttlity Fealrties C C C C C C C Flood ControWhlrty Comdor P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Public Assembly C C C C C C C C C C C C C Public Safety 8 Lkility Services C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C ious Assembly Reli C C C C C C C C C C C C C g Schools C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C NOTES IP - Industnal Park HO -Haven Avenue Oveday Distnct GI -Generallndustnat MI/HI -Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial HI -Heavylndusinal ~ y ~l1 P - Pertnltted Use C - Condltlonaliy Permitted Use ^ -Non-Marked Uses not pertnrtted A -Adult Entertainment Zoning Permit Required MU/OS -Mixed Use/Open Space P' -Permitted with Master Plan approval for 35 acre minimum c-a~ 17 30-7 1 /03 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sectton 17.30 030 Table 17.30.030 Continued -Use Regulations fo`Industrial Districts LAND USE IP GI GI GI GI GI IP IP GI UHI GI GI IP GI GI HI IP IP MUIOS USE TYPES SUBAREAS HO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 9 10 17 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 COMMERCIAL Adult Entertainment A A A A A A A A A A AgncutturaUNursery Supplies 8 Services P P P P P P P P Animal Care C C C C C C C C Automotive Fleet Storage C C C C P C C P Automotive Fueling Servx:es C Automotive Rental P P P P P P P P P Automotrve/Light Truck Repair -Minor P P P P P P P P P Automotive/Truck Repair - Malor P C P P P P C C C Automotive Sales end Leasing C C C Automotive Sernce Court P P P P C P P P P Q Automotive Service Station C C C C C C C C C C C C J Building ContrectoYS l7fhce 8 Yards P P P P P P P P P P P a Building ContredoYS Storage Yard P P U Building Maintenance Services P P P P P P P P P P P P LL ) Building 8 Light Egmpment Supplies 8 Sales P C P C C P P C P C C P f.. W Business Supply Retail 8 Services P' P P P P P P P P P P P P N Business Support Services P' P C P P C P P P C P P P P P P m Communication Services P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Convemence Sales 8 Servces C' C C P P C C C C C C W Entertainment C C C C C C C C Q Extensive Impact Commemial C C C C [D Fast Food Sales C' C C C C C C C ~ fA Financial, Insurance 8 Real Estate Servces P P P P P P P C P C C P P O Food 8 8everege Sales C• C C C C C C C C C ~ Funerel 8 Crematory Servtces C C ~ W Heavy Egwpment Sales 8 Rentals C C C C C P C C C C P W HoteVMotel P P P P C Indoor W holesale/Retail Commercial C C C C C C C Laundry Services P P P P P P P P MedicaVHealth Care Servtces P P P P P P P P P P P P Personal Services C- C P P P P P C P P P Petroleum Products Storage C C C C C C Recreation Facdmes C C C C C C C P C C P P P Repair Semces P P C P P P P P P P P C Restaurants P P P P P P P P Restaurants with Bar or Entertainment C C C C C C C Specialty Building Supplies 8 Home Improvement P P C Warehouse-Style Retail Merchandising " C NOTES IP -Industnal Park HO -Haven Avenue Overlay Dlstnct GI -Generallndustnal MI/HI Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial HI -Heavy Industnal • -Ancillary uses limited to 20 percent of the floor area per Section 17 30 080 5 b •' - Refer to Subarea 12 Special Considerations for additional restnctions P - Pertnmed Use C -Conditionally Permitted Use ^ -Non-Marked uses not permitted A -Adult Entertainment Zoning Permit Required MU/OS -Mixed Use/Open Space P' -Permitted with Master Plan approval for 35 acres minimum 17.30.8 11 /00 • RESOLUTION NO 05-OS A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING USE DETERMINATION DRC2005-00002, BY DETERMINING THAT A FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT CENTER, INCLUDING INFLATABLE PLAY EQUIPMENT AND GAMES FOR BIRTHDAYS, CHURCH AND SCHOOL FUNDRAISING, AND CORPORATE EVENTS, IS SIMILAR TO A RECREATION FACILITY WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A Recitals 1 All About Fun LLC, filed an application for Use Determination DRC2005-00002 for a family entertainment center, including inflatable play equipment and games, for birthdays, church and school fundraising, and corporate events, within the industnal districts Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Use Determination request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 26th day of January 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the Use Determination and concluded said meeting on that date All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred • B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 The Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Reatals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on January 26, 2005, including written and oral staff reports, the Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The applicant desires to lease space within amulti-tenant industnal building located in General Industrial (Subarea 8), however, this use determination applies to all industnal districts, and b The application contemplates a family entertainment center" for indoor amusement The faality will be reservable for private parties, fundraiser or corporate parties, and open admission to the general public dunng limited hours The facility will provide large rooms filled with inflatable play equipment, table games, a rock climbing wall, and snack/dnnk vending machines There will be no food preparation or cooking, and c The Development Code Table 17 30 030 -Use Regulations for Industrial Districts lists the secondary permitted and conditionally permitted uses that may be allowed in the industnal districts 'Family Entertainment Center' Is not listed, however, several other land use categories are listed which may be similar, including Recreation Facilities, Entertainment, and Public Assembly There a variety of indoor Recreation Facilities throughout the industnal area, including gymnastics and martial arts studios, health clubs, a soccer practice facility (in Subarea B), gun shooting range, and baseball practice facility, and G--31 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-08 USE DETERMINATION DRC2005-00002 -ALL ABOUT FUN LLC January 26, 2005 Page 2 . d The use in question is similar to Recreation Facilities, a permitted use m the same distnct, because it provides facilities and play egwpment for individual or group sports challenge and table games for amusement, and e The use m question fulfills the stated purpose and intent of the General Idustnal Distnct (Subarea 8) to provide "for the widest possible range of light and medwm mdustnal type activity, mcludmg manufactunng, assembling, fabncation, wholesaling, heavy commercial, and office uses" [emphasis added] Subarea 8 is intended as a transitional "buffer between non-mdustnal and heavy mdustnal uses", and f The use m question does meet and conform to the applicable goals and objectives of the General Plan The General Plan Land Use Element states that it "is responsive to our Vision because it b) makes available the potential for family entertainment and shared expenences not typically found in suburban communities like ours k) provides for a mix of residential, office and commercial uses at an intimate scale that offers choices m selected locations not generally available to our residents elsewhere in our community" [emphasis added] 3 Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on January 26, 2005, including wntten and oral staff reports, the Commission hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows per the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, Section 17 02 040 D a The use m question is of a similar intensity to other pertmtted or conditionally • permitted uses m the same distnct b The use m question meets the purpose and intent of the intent of the distnct m which it is proposed c The use m question meets and conforms to the applicable goals and obtectives of the General Plan 4 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above referenced meeting and upon specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby determines that the family entertainment center, mcludmg inflatable play egwpment and games, for birthdays, church and school fundraising, and corporate events, is similar to Recreation Faalities, and should be deemed as a permitted use in Subarea 8 5 The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF JANUARY 2005 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Macias, Chairman E ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-08 USE DETERMINATION DRC2005-00002 -ALL ABOUT FUN LLC January 26, 2005 Page 3 ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planrnng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of January 2005, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS Smooth Feed SheetsT'" i Use template for 5160® ~1 PC ITEM: A, B & C SUBTT16776 & D RC2004-01002/D RC2004-00052 VANCE Van Daele Development Corp 2900 Adams Street, Suite C-25 Riverside, CA 92504 Loren Fntz 13104 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739-9574 PC ITEM: D DRC2004-00404 MIKE 2 copies to Applicant Hogle Ireland, Inc 4280 Latham Street, Swte B Riverside, CA 92501 ~~ AVERY Address Labels PC ITEM: E DRC2005-00002 DAN Betsy & Charles Morello 5652 Morning Canyon Way Alta Loma, CA 91737 Kent Hin Cushman & 701 No iaven Avenue, a 300 O~ io, CA 91764-4925 ~ CP ITEM: Na PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 26, 2005 CITY PLANNER JANUARY 25, 2005-CANCELLED Laser 5160® Plannmg Commission Meeting of ~ ~ ~/~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN-UP SHEET Please print your name, address, and aty and indicate the item you have spoken regarding Thank you 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 NAME ADDRESS CITY ITEM S~~ T;~ti',ot 24~ AeQanu S4-. 2;~urc~dc Sw`Ec c• LS ~J P. w~ lel w~~nvl rAP~2 Ei.J I ~ ~~yyl~,oj /'L /// ~7li~ ~ ~~