Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007/09/19 - Agenda Packet10500 Civic Center Drive O Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 City Office: (909) 477-2700 AG ENDAs REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR McCTINGS 15t and 3`d Wednesdays ~ 7:00 P.M. SEPTEMBER 19, 2~~7 M EMBIRS MAYOR MAYOR PRO TEM COUNCIL MEMBERS Donald J. Kurth, M.D. Diane Williams Rex Gutierrez L. Dennis Michael Sam Spagnolo CITY MANAGER CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK Jack Lam, AICP James L. Markman Debra J. Adams, CMC ORDER OF BI7SINF,SS CLOSED SESSION Tapia Conference Room............ 5:30 P.M. REGULAR MEETING Council Chambers ......................... 7:00 P.M. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SEPTEMBER 19, 2007 A. ~ 5:30 P.M. -CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER - TAPIA ROOM 1. Roll Call: Mayor Kurth Mayor Pro Tem Williams Councilmembers Gutierrez, Michael and Spagnolo CLOSED SESSION CALLED TO ORDER AS THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEMS C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED'SESSION 1. LABOR NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 TO GIVE JOHN GILLISON, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, DIRECTION IN REGARDS TO THE MEET AND CONFER PROCESS -FIRE E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS F. RECESS CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD MEETING AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA _ SEPTEMBER 19, 2007 2 G. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE AGENCY, FIRE BOARD AND COUNCIL. 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call: Mayor Kurth Mayor Pro Tem Williams Councilmembers Gutierrez, Michael and Spagnolo H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation of the Animal Care and Services Department's "Love 'EM and License 'EM" Campaign. 2. Presentation regarding the new "Adoption Partner Program" with PetSmart on 4'" Street. I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Agency, Fire Board, or City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Agency, Fire Board, or City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Agency, Fire Board or City Council, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. (CONTINUED ON PAGE 3) 3 The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. J. AGENCY/FIRE BOARD/COUNCIL RESPONSES TO PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the Agency, Fire Board or City Council to respond to comments made by the general public. K. CONSENT CALENDAR -REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Agency at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by an Agencymember for discussion. 1. Approval of Check Register dated August 29 through September 11, 2007, for the total 1 amount of $166,640.41. 2. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of August 31, 2007. 2 3. Approval to authorize Emcor Service/Mesa Energy Systems, Inc. (EMCOR Service) to 14 continue as the single source service provider and installer for HVAC/Control work and related energy management systems for City facilities; approve contract Amendment Number 1 for additional monthly maintenance scope of work at the Cultural Arts Center ($9,528.00) and HVAC Water Treatment for Cultural Arts Center and Central Park ($2,560.00); approve extra work not to exceed $15,000; and approve the following capital maintenance projects approved by the City Council in the FY 2007/2008 budget: HVAC modifications at the Civic Center for department remodels ($80,000), HVAC unit for Central Park computer room ($81,000), and perform indoor air quality modifications as needed at citywide facilities ($10,000); to be funded from Accts. 1001312-5304 ($159,528); 2650801- 5602 ($80,000); 2650801-5603 ($81,000) and 1025001-5304 ($10,000), and appropriate $80,000 into Acct. No. 2650801-5602 and $81,000 into Acct. No. 2650801-5603. 4. Approval to accept the Improvements constructed by Hufcor Airwall (RA 06-013) and Carey 16 Sign Graphics (06-028) at the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center as complete, authorization to file a Notice of Completion for the improvements and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond. 4 RESOLUTION NO. RA 07-019 1] A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS COMPLETED BY CAREY SIGN GRAPHICS FOR THE VICTORIA GARDENS CULTURAL CENTER PROJECT, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK RESOLUTION NO. RA 07-020 18 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS COMPLETED BY HUFCOR AIRWALL FOR THE VICTORIA GARDENS CULTURAL CENTER PROJECT, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK L. CONSENT CALENDAR-FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Boardmember for discussion. 5. Approval of Check Register dated August 29 through September 11, 2007, for the total 19 amount of $99,674.80. 6. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of August 31, 2007. 22 7. Approval of a Resolution declaring results of a Special Election in Community Facilities 26 District No. 85-1, Annexation No. 07-6 (Diamond Industries - APN: 0209-192-07, 08, 09, 10, 11 8 12). RESOLUTION NO. FD 07-050 27 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ANNEXATION NO. 07-6 30 8. Approval of the Fire Agencies Insurances Risk Authority (FAIRA) Amendments of the Fourth Amended Joint Powers Agreement to amend Article 21 to change the withdrawal of members notice from 120 days to 12 months advance written notice and amend Article 27 to only require the approval of a majority of the Member Agencies which vote on a proposed amendment, so long as not less than 51 % of the Member Agencies have voted. 5 RESOLUTION NO. FD 07-051 32 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE 21 OF THE FOURTH AMENDED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT OF THE FIRE AGENCIES INSURANCE RISK AUTHORITY RESOLUTION NO. FD 07-052 35 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE 27 OF THE FOURTH AMENDED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT OF THE FIRE AGENCIES INSURANCE RISK AUTHORITY M. CONSENT CALENDAR -CITY COUNCIL The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember for discussion. 9. Approval of Check Register dated August 29 through September 11, 2007, and payroll 39 ending September 11, 2007, for the total amount of $2,922,634.24. 10. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of August 31, 2007. 65 11. Approval of a Resolution to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the 12 73 KV Electrical Distribution Improvements at Various Locations, to be funded from Municipal Utility Funds. RESOLUTION NO. 07-222 ~q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "12 KV ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION IMPROVEMENTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS" AND AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 12. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Construction of the La Senda and Etiwanda Channel Access Ramps and Foothill Boulevard Drainage 79 Improvements, to be funded from Acct. No. 1112303-5650/1557112-0 and 1112303- 5650/1558112-0 (General Drainage Funds). R A GENCY, EDEVELOPMENT FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND 6 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SEPTEMBER 19, 2007 jZANCxo G'UCAMONGA RESOLUTION NO. 07-223 81 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE LA SENDA AND ETIWANDA CHANNEL ACCESS RAMPS AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 13. Approval of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopting the 86 2007/2010 Measure "I" Three-Year Capital Improvement Program for Measure "I" Funds. RESOLUTION NO. 07-224 87 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 2007/2010 MEASURE "I" THREE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BEGINNING IN FISCAL YEAR 2007/08 FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MEASURE "I' FUNDS 14. Approval of a Resolution to Summarily Vacate a portion of Rochester Avenue (Charles 89 Smith Avenue), approximately 460 feet south of Sixth Street, V-211 related project Parcel Map 16009. RESOLUTION NO. 07-225 91 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF EXCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 460 FEET SOUTH OF SIXTH STREET, V-211 15. Approval of a Map, Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 36 and 94 Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map No. 16009, located on the southeast corner and southwest corner of Sixth Street and Charles Smith Avenue, submitted by Chase Back Bay, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 07-226 96 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 16009 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 16009) RESOLUTION NO. 07-227 97 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 16009 16. Approval of the Community Services Department Update. 106 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SEPTEMBER 19, 2007 17. Approval of Resolution 06-238(B), including new position classifications for Fiscal Year 2007-08 Budget. RESOLUTION NO. 06-2388 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO INCLUDE NEW POSITION CLASSIFICATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007-2008 BUDGET 7 116 117 18. Approval to accept the bids received and award an authorize the execution of the contract 128 in the amount of $382,357.71 to the apparent low bidder, American Asphalt South, Inc. (CO 07-177), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $38,235.77, for the Fiscal Year 2007/2008 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation -Slurry Seal of Various Streets, to be funded from Measure "I" Fund, Account No. 1176303-5650/1022176 and Traffic Congestion Fund, Acct. No. 1190303-5650/1022190. 19. Approval of a contract amendment (CO 03-090) adjusting the hourly rate for inspection services provided by Associated Engineers, Inc. 20. Approval of an agreement with the Chaffey College Foundation (CO 07-178) to broadcast the "Chaffey College Foundation Telethon" on RCTV-3. 21. Approval of annual support agreement with Sungard Bi-Tech, Inc., (CO 04-155) to provide maintenance support for FY 2007/08 in the amount of $85,776.43, funded by Acct. No. 1001209-5300 and approval of an option to renew with a negotiated annual increase, upon mutual consent, an annual support agreement for an additional four (4) years. 22. Approval to authorize Emcor Service/Mesa Energy Systems, Inc. (EMCOR Service) to continue as the single source service provider and installer for HVAC/Control work and related energy management systems for City facilities; approve contract Amendment Number 1 for additional monthly maintenance scope of work at the Cultural Arts Center ($9,528.00) and HVAC Water Treatment for Cultural Arts Center and Central Park ($2,560.00); approve extra work not to exceed $15,000; and approve the following capital maintenance projects approved by the City Council in the FY 2007/2008 budget: HVAC modifications at the Civic Center for department remodels ($80,000), HVAC unit for Central Park computer room ($81,000), and perform indoor air quality modifications as needed at citywide facilities ($10,000); to be funded from Accts. 1001312-5304 ($159,528); 2650801- 5602 ($80,000); 2650801-5603 ($81,000) and 1025001-5304 ($10,000) and appropriate $80,000 into Acct. No. 2650801-5602 and $81,000 into Acct. No. 2650801-5603. 131 134 138 143 23. Approval of a Public Convenience of Necessity Determination - DRC2007-00459 -Han Ma 145 Eum Market - A request to issue a Public Convenience or Necessity Determination for a Departrment of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) Type 21 Off-Sale General license for an Asian food store in the Community Commercial District, located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue at 9849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit M - APN: 0208- 301-16. (CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 15, 2007) REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SEPTEMBER 19, 2007 8 RESOLUTION NO. 07-196 155 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY DRC2007-00459 FOR AN ASIAN FOOD STORE IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND RAMONA AVENUE AT 9849 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, UNIT M-APN: 0208-301-16 24. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Parcel Map 15350, located at the 157 southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and 6'" Street, submitted by General Dynamics Properties, Inc. N. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION DECLARING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY 159 (ALDER CREEK, LLC - SUBTT17769 -ANNEXATION NO. 07-7) TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT, CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS RESOLUTION NO. FD 07-053 161 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 07-7) TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD 85-1 ), CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS 9 O. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Mayor will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN 168 AMENDMENT DRC2006-00223 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC -Request to change the land use designation for four parcels on Red Hill Country Club Drive from Open Space to Mixed Use to be consistent with the Mixed Use Land Use Designation at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue, to add these same four parcels to Section 2.5.5.4 Western Gateway in the Bear Gulch Area, expand the range of development in the residential classification to 87% in Table III-7, and to establish a master plan overlay district for the entire 10.1 acre project site on the land use plan in accordance with Section 111.2.4.1 of the General Plan -APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 and 45. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2006-00350 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC -Request to change the zoning for four parcels on Red Hill Country Club Drive from Low Residential (2- 4 dwelling units per acre) to Mixed Use, to be consistent with the Mixed Use zoning designation at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue; establish a master plan overlay district for the entire 10.1 acre project site on the development district map in accordance with Section 17.20.030 of the Development Code at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue -APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 and 45. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2007-00029 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66. LLC -Request to change the Table for the Bear Gulch Mixed-Use area contained in Development Code Section 17.32.020,0.3 to expand the range of development in the residential classification to 87% and to include the "most case" column found in the General Plan Table III-7 -APN: 0207- 011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 and 45. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00341 - ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC -Master Plan established under DRC2006-00223 and DRC2006-00350 for 10.1 acre project site with one 2-story office building, 7 live/work units, 68 town homes, and 23 single-family residences at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue in the Mixed Use Zone of Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts, including expansion of the range of development in the residential classification to 87% in Table III-7 of the General Plan. APN: 0207-011-35, 356, 41, 43, 44 and 45. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC -Condominium subdivision of 10.1 acres into two lots with office condominiums in one office building on Lot 1, and residential condominiums in 7 live/work units, 68 town homes, and 23 single family residences on Lot 2 at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue in the Mixed Use Zone of Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts. APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 and 45. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SEPTEMBER 19, 2007 RESOLUTION NO. 07-228 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00223, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR FOUR PARCELS ON RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE FROM OPEN SPACE TO MIXED USE TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE MIXED USE LAND USE DESIGNATION AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND GROVE AVENUE, TO ADD THESE SAME FOUR PARCELS TO SECTION 2.5.5.4 WESTERN GATEWAY IN THE BEAR GULCH AREA, EXPAND THE RANGE OF DEVELOPMENT IN THE RESIDENTIAL CLASSIFICATION TO 87 PERCENT IN TABLE III-7, AND TO ESTABLISH A MASTER PLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT FOR THE ENTIRE 10.1 ACRE PROJECT SITE ON THE LAND USE PLAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 111.2.4.4 OF THE GENERAL PLAN; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0207-011- 35, 36, 41, 43, 44 AND 45 ORDINANCE NO. 780 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2006-00350, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO MIXED USE FOR FOUR PARCELS COMPRISING OF APPROXIMATELY 1.04 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, AND ESTABLISH A MASTER PLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT FOR THE SIX PARCELS COMPRISING APPROXIMATELY 10.1 ACRES OF LAND AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND GROVE AVENUE ON THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP IN ACCORDANCE WITH MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 17.20.030; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THERE OF -APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 AND 45 ORDINANCE NO. 781 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2007-00029, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE BEAR GULCH MIXED-USE AREA TABLE CONTAINED IN MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 17.32.020.0.3 TO EXPAND THE RANGE OF DEVELOPMENT IN THE RESIDENTIAL CLASSIFICATION TO 87 PERCENT AND TO ADD THE "MOST CASE" COLUMN FOUND IN THE CORRESPONDING GENERAL PLAN TABLE III-7, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 10 378 398 419 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SEPTEMBER 19, 2007 11 RESOLUTION NO. 07-229 422 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00341, THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. SUBTT18179, AND THE MASTER PLAN UNDER THE NEWLY-ESTABLISHED MASTER PLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND GROVE AVENUE IN THE MIXED USE DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0207-011- 35, 36, 41, 43, 44 AND 45 RESOLUTION NO. 07-230 465 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18179, A SUBDIVISION OF 10.1 ACRES OF LAND INTO TWO LOTS FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES IN THE MIXED USE DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND GROVE AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 AND 45 P. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. 1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) 2. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION PROHIBITING THE USE OF EXPANDED 509 POLYSTYRENE FOOD SERVICE PRODUCTS AT CITY FACILITIES AND CITY- SPONSORED EVENTS RESOLUTION NO. 07-231 511 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROHIBITING THE USE OF EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE (COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS "STYROFOAM") FOOD SERVICE PRODUCTS WITHIN CITY FACILITIES AND AT CITY- SPONSORED EVENTS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA _ SEPTEMBER 19, 2~~7 12 Q. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING R. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 13, 2007, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Agenda Check Register 8/29/2007 through 9/11/2007 Check No. AP - 00266667 AP - 00266681 AP - 00266681 AP - 00256703 AP - 00256726 AP - 00256726 AP - 00266726 AP - 00256754 AP - 00256766 AP - 00256800 AP - 00266816 AP - 00266816 AP - 00256833 AP - 00256886 AP - 00266964 AP - 00266960 AP - 00267078 AP - 00257116 AP - oozs7lao AP - 00267186 AP - 00257186 Check Date Vendor Name 8/29/2007 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 8/29/2007 CALIFORNIA STAGE AND LIGHTING INC. 8/29/2007 CALIFORNIA STAGE AND LIGHTING INC. 8/29/2007 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 8/29/2007 GEOGRAPHICS 8/29/2007 GEOGRAPHICS 8/29/2007 GEOGRAPHICS 8/29/2007 LIM & NASCIMENTO ENGINEERING CORP 8/29/2007 MUNIFINANCIAL INC 8/29/2007 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 8/29/2007 SHOWREEL INTERNATIONAL 8/29/2007 SHOWREEL INTERNATIONAL. 8/29/2007 SUNSET PUBLISHING 9/6/2007 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 9/5/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 9/5/2007 FRITTS FORD 9/5/2007 PITASSI ARCHITECTS INC 9/5/2007 SHESHUNOFF INFORMATION SERVICES 9/5/2007 STYLISTICS 9/5/2007 WELLS FARGO BANK N A 9/6/2007 WELLS FARGO BANK N A Amount 221.47 4,191.79 164.64 68,840.00 172.40 88.89 1,863.81 33,026.09 2,000.00 10,158.00 90.00 3,399.40 1,621.30 1,900.00 18.92 23,148.06 11,261.73 489.96 10,583.96 1,7so.oo 1.750.00 Total for Check ID AP: 166,640.41 Total for Enti[y: 166,640.41 P1 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Date: 09/12/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:24:2 124,669.96 City of Rancho Cucamonga Investments Par Value Market Value Book ~ Value %of Portfolio Term Days to Maturity YTM 360 Equiv. YTM 365 Equiv. Local Agency Investment Fund 17,704,447.10 17,704,447.10 17,704,447.10 11.83 1 1 5.181 5.253 Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 127,000,000.00 126,721,672.70 126,921,187.50 84.82 1,522 828 4.407 4.468 Treasury Securities -Coupon 5,000,000.00 5,035,937.60 5,002,343.75 3.34 661 546 4.654 4.719 149,704,447.10 149,462,057.30 149,627,976.35 100.00% 1,314 719 4.507 4.569 Investments Cash and Accrued Interest Passbook/Checking (not included in yield calculations) Accrued Interest at Purchase Subtotal Total Cash and Investments 63,007.50 187,877.46 124,869.96 63,007.50 187,877.46 149,829, 317.06 149,649,934.76 149, 615,855. Bt 1 1 0.197 0.200 1,314 719 4.507 4.569 Total Earnings August 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 621,677.44 1,236,454.67 Average Daily Balance 161,283,762.85 161,623,304.67 Effective Rate of Return 4.54°/ 4.50% I certify that this report accurately reFlects all Agency pooled investments and is in wnformity with the investment policy adopted December 20, 2006. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end market values were obtained from (IDC) -Interactive Data Corporation pricing service. The attached Summary of RDA 2001 & 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds as of current month end and Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the prior month's end is provided under the City offcial Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bond documents govern the management of these funds. \ -I(-o~ John R. Ison, Treasurer Reporting periotl 06/0112007-OBI31I2007 Run Oete: 09/12/200] -12:25 Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary August 31, 2007 124,669.98 Portfolio RDA CP PM (PRF_PM1) SymRept 6 41.202b Report Ver. 500 N Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Portfolio Management Portfolio Details -Investments August 31, 2007 Page 2 Average Purchase Statetl YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Mootly's 360 Maturlry Date Local Agency Investment FUnd SYS145 145 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND Subtotal and Average 27,430,253.55 Federal Agency Issues -Coupon 313310K55 904 313310M79 911 31331TND9 927 31331TWH0 - 935 31331TWJ6 936 31331TG62 942 31331TU25 952 31331XNU2 966 31331XT05 972 31331XA36 982 31339XPL2 917 3133X4087 937 3133X4XF3 938 3133XAR25 955 3133XAMW4 957 3133XJVL9 967 3133%K504 969 3133XKUH6 981 3133XL304 964 3133XLAH6 986 3133XLAF0 987 3133XLBS1 988 3128%1808 903 3128XiJD0 914 3128X25Y7 940 3128X30F9 941 3128X3FC2 945 3128X3FZ1 946 3128XSC48 965 3128XSR75 971 3128XSR75 973 3128XSK80 979 Run Dale: 09112120W - 12'.25 17,704,447.10 17,704 447.10 17,704,447.10 5.253 5.181 1 17,704,447.10 17,704,447.10 17,704,447.10 5.181 1 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/19/2003 2,000,000.00 1,973,125.00 1,997,500.00 3.120 3.104 261 05/19/2008 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/03/2003 3,000,000.00 2,959,687.50 3,000,000.00 3.210 3.166 276 06/03/2008 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 12/17/2003 4,000,000.00 3,966,250.00 4,000,000.00 3.970 3.916 290 06/17/2008 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/17/2004 2,000,000.00 1,980,000.00 ~ 2,000,000.00 3.240 3.196 198 03/17/2008 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/17/2004 3,000,000.00 2,951,250.00 2,998,125.00 3.550 3.517 443 17/17/2008 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 04/29/2004 3,000,000.00 2,965,312.50 2,982,000.00 3.920 4.012 422 10/27/2008 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/10/2004 2,000,000.00 1,993,125.00 2,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 100 12/10/2007 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 02/13/2007 3,000,000.00 3,006,562.50 3,000,000.00 5.350 5.277 895 02/12/2010 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/28/2007 5,000,000.00 5,007,812.50 5,000,000.00 5.250 5.178 1,670 03/28/2012 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/25/2007 3,000,000.00 3,030,937.50 3,000,000.00 5.050 4.981 1,362 05/25/2011 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/26/2003 5,000,000.00 4,992,187.50 5,000,000.00 2.450 2.417 25 09/26/2007 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/26/2004 2,000,000.00 1,973,125.00 2,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 572 03/28/2009 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/29/2004 2,000,000.00 1 988,750.00 2,000,000.00 3.500 3.453 118 12/28/2007 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/16/2005 4,000,000.00 3,967,500.00 4,000,000.00 4.080 4.024 352 08/18/2008 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/22/2005 4,000,000.00 3,976,250.00 3,999,000.00 4.000 3.954 774 02/22/2008 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/13/2007 3,000,000.00 3,026,250.00 3,000,000.00 5.000 4.929 1,287 03/11/2011 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/09/2007 3,000,000.00 2,996,250.00 2,999,250.00 5 000 5.031 130 01/09/2008 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/24/2007 4,000,000.00 4,008,750.00 3,964,000.00 5.150 5.190 1,361 05/24/2011 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/29/2007 3,000,000.00 3,019,687.50 3,000,000.00 5.350 5.277 1 732 05/29/2012 FEOERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/18/2007 2,000,000.00 2,010,625.00 2,000,000.00 5.600 5.523 1,752 06/18/2012 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/20/2007 1,000,000.00 1,005,312.50 1,000,000.00 5.600 5.523 1,754 06/20/2012 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/25/2007 3,000,000.00 3,015,000.00 3,000,000.00 5.500 5.425 1,028 06/25/2010 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 05/19/2003 5,000,000.00 4,943,025.21 4,993,750.00 3.500 3.479 261 05/79/2008 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 06/12/2003 3,000,000.00 2,953,499.91 2,999,100.00 3.030 2.995 264 06/11/2008 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 04/19/2004 2,000,000.00 1,994,070.13 1,997,600.00 2.920 2.916 48 10/19/2007 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 04/26/2004 2,000,000.00 1,994,176.03 2,000,000.00 3.280 3.235 55 10/26/2007 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 05/24/2004 3,000,000.00 2,989,881.14 2,999,062.50 3.750 3.708 83 11/23/2007 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 05/26/2004 3,000,000.00 2,975,916.14 2,993,700.00 4.000 4.002 265 05/23/2008 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 02/08/2007 3,000,000.00 3,006,746.98 3,000,000.00 5.375 5.301 891 02/08/2010 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 03/20/2007 1,000,000.00 1,003,255.01 _998,300.00 5.250 5.217 1,657 03/15/2012 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 04/04/2007 2,000,000.00 2,006,510.01 1,995,600.00 5.250 5.228 1,657 03/15/2012 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 05/10/2007 5,000,000.00 5,024,904.64 5,000,000.00 5.400 5.324 1,644 03/02/2012 Portfolio RDA CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept 6 41.202b W Report Var. 5.00 Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Portfolio Management Portfolio Details -Investments August 31, 2007 Page 3 Average Purchase Stated VTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Date Federal Agency Issues -Coupon 3136FSGP0 934 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 03116/2004 3,000,000.00 2,964,375.00 3,000,000.00 4.040 3.985 562 03/16/2009 3136FSP61 939 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/12/2004 2,000,000.00 1,995,000.00 2,000,000.00 3.020 2.979 41 10/12/2007 3136F6V06 956 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 02/22/2005 4,000,000.00 3,976,250.00 3,997,200.00 4.000 3.970 174 02/22/2008 3136FBFW0 968 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 03/07/2007 5,000,000.00 5,015,625.00 5,000,000.00 5.430 5.356 1,283 03/07/2011 3136FBGC3 970 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 03/09/2007 1,000,000.00 1 000,000.00 999,650.00 5.260 5.196 1,649 03/07/2012 3136F6LU7 976 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/09/2007 5,000,000.00 5,010,937.50 4,996,250.00 5.250 5.199 1,346 05/09/2011 31396ABC5 977 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05109/2007 3,000,000.00 3,011,250.00 2,998,500.00 5.300 5.239 1,710 05/07/2012 31398ABC5 980 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/21/2007 1000,000.00 1,003,750.00 997,000.00 5.300 5.296 1,710 05/07/2012 31398ACL4 983 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/29/2007 4,000,000.00 4,017,500.00 4,000,000.00 5.500 5.425 1,732 05/29/2012 31398ADF6 965 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 06/12/2007 4,000,000.00 4 021,250.00 3,995,600.00 5.600 5.548 1,746 06/12/2012 Subtotal antl Average 128,080,663.31 127,000,000.00 126,721,672.70 126,921,187.50 4.407 826 Treasury Securities -Coupon 912628GJ3 978 TREASURY NOTE 05/09/2007 5,000,000.00 5,035,937.50 5,002,343.75 4.750 4.654 546 02/28/2009 Subtotal antl Average 5,002,343.75 5,000,000.00 5,035,937.50 5,002,343.75 4.654 546 Total antl Average 161,283,762.85 Run Hate: 09/12/2007 -12'.25 149,704,447.10 149,462,057.30 169,627,976.35 4.507 719 Portfolio RDA CP PM IPRF_PM21 SymRep1641202b ~ Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Portfolio Management Portfolio Details -Cash August 37, 2007 Page 4 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity SavingslMiscellaneous Accounts SVS144 144 BANK OF AMERICA 124,869.96 124,669.96 124,869.96 0.200 0.197 1 Average Balance 0.00 Accrued Interest at Purchase 63,007.50 63,007.50 1 Subtotal 187,877.46 187,877 46 Total Cash antl lnveslmentss 161,283,762.65 149,829,317.06 149,649,93d.76 149,816,865.81 4.507 719 Run Dale'. 09I12I2007 - 12:25 Portfolio RDA CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRep16.47.202b ~ Cl1 Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Portfolio Management Activity By Type August 1, 2007 through August 31, 2007 Page 5 Beginning Statetl Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary) SYS145 145 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 5.253 3700,000.00 14,000,000.00 Subtotal 26,004,447.10 3,700,000.00 74,000,000.00 17,704,447.10 SavingslMiscellaneous Accounts (Monthly Summary) SYS144 144 BANK OF AMERICA 0.200 0.00 667,153.36 Subtotal 792,023.32 0.00 667,153.36 124,869.96 Federal Agency Issues -Coupon 313310705 924 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 3.050 08/13/2007 0.00 2,995,312.50 Subtotal 129,916,500.00 0.00 2,995,312.50 126,921,187.50 Treasury Securities -Coupon Subtotal 5,002,343.75 5,002,343.75 Total 163,715,314.17 3,700,000.00 17,662,465.86 149,752,848.31 Portfolio RDA CP Run Date' 09/1 28007 - 12'.25 PM (PRF_PM3) SymRept 6 41.201 ~ Report Ver 5.00 Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents For the Month Ended July 31, 2007 Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Cost Bond Issue Paving Agent Account Name Investment Date Date Yield Value ~. 96 Housing Set-Aside Tax Bank of New York Interest Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 8/30/2002 N/A` 4.75% $ 301.99 Principal Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 8/30/2006 N/A` 4.75% 220.69 Housing Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 3/12/2002 N/A' 4.00% 0.50 $ 523.18 01 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Wells Fargo Reserve Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 8/22/2001 N/A` 4.40% $ 7,371,529.03 Principal Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 8/31/2005 N/A` 4.35% 2.76 Interest Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 8/31/2005 N/A` 4.35% 713.20 Special Fund ~ Federated Treasury Obligations 9/3 012 0 0 5 N/A` 4.40% 168,512.53 $ 7,540,757.52 99 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Wells Fargo Interest Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 2/28/2005 N/A' 4.46% $ 830.18 Principal Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 8/31/2005 N/A' 4.38% 547.51 Special Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 9/30/2005 N/A' 4.15% 144.57 $ 1,522.26 04 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Wells Fargo Reserve Fund Investment Agreement 3/31/2004 N/A' 5.07% $ 12,938,491.70 Interest Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 2/28/2005 N/A` 4.40% 328,902.50 Principal Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 8/31/2005 N/A' 4.41% 862.23 Special Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 9/30/2005 N/A` 4.40% 3,634.87 $ 13,271,891.30 TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS $ 20,814,694.26 `Note: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated upon demand V RDA 2001 Tax Allocation Bonds Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary August 31, 2007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Par Market Book % of Days [o YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value PoMollo Term Maturity 360 Equly. 365 Equlv. Treasury Securities-BEGS 18,090,300.00 18,090,300.00 18,090,300.00 85.23 223 179 4.928 4.997 Treasury Securities-SLGS Demantl 3,134730.00 3,134,730.00 3,134,730.00 14.77 1 1 3.787 3.840 21,225,030.00 21,225,030.00 21,225,030.00 100.00% 190 153 4.760 4.826 Investments Total Earnings August 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 87,741.19 176,212.05 Average Daily Balance 21,515,352.56 22,282,122.77 Effective Rate of Return 4.80% 4.66% This report accurately reflects the investment of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Project 2001 Tax Allocation Bonds proceeds in accordance with the Agency's supplemental indenture dated August 1, 2001. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash Flow liquidity to meet the public improvements schedule and funding requirements. Reporting period OBI01/2007-08I31I2007 Portfolio TAB CP Run Date: 09/12/2007-12:00 PM IPRF_PM1)SymRept641.2@b ~ Report Ver. 5.00 ~ RDA 2001 Tax Allocation Bonds Portfolio Management Portfolio Details -Investments August 31, 2007 Page 2 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Inves[ment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date Local Agency Investment Fund SYS101 101 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.253 5.253 1 Subtotal antl Average 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0 Treasury Securities -SLGS 535577850 127 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 1,830,100.00 1,830,100.00 1,830,100.00 4.720 4.786 4 09/05/2007 535578670 128 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 1,830,100.00 1,830,100.00 1,830,100.00 4.860 4.928 34 10/05/2007 $35580620 129 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 1,830,100.00 1,830,100.00 1,830,700.00 4.940 5.009 65 11/05/2007 535581810 130 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 4.990 5.059 95 12/05/2007 535583060 131 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 1,241,660.00 1,241,660.00 1,241,660.00 5.020 5.090 126 01/05/2008 535583080 132 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 1,241,660.00 1,241,660.00 1,241,660.00 5.020 5.090 157 02/05/2008 535583700 133 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 1,241,660.00 1,241,660.00 1,241,660.00 5.010 5.080 186 03/05/2008 535584200 134 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 1,241,660.00 1,241,660.00 1,241,660.00 5.000 5.069 217 04/05/2008 535585190 135 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 1,241,660.00 1,241,660.00 1,241,660.00 4.990 5.059 247 05/05/2008 535585220 136 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 1,241,680.00 1,241,680.00 1,241,680.00 4.980 5.049 278 06/05/2008 535586010 137 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 608,330.00 608,330.00. 608,330.00 4.970 5.039 308 07/05/2008 535586120 138 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 608,330.00 608,330.00 608,330.00 4.960 4.957 339 08/05/2008 535586550 139 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 608,330.00 608,330.00 608,330.00 4.960 4.951 370 09/05/2008 535586660 140 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 608,330.00 608,330.00 608,330.00 4.960 4.945 400 10/05/2008 535586670 141 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 606,330.00 608,330.00 608,330.00 4.930 4.908 431 11/05/2008 535586800 142 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 608,370.00 608,370.00 606,370.00 4.930 4.901 461 12/05/2008 Subtotal and Average 18,090,300.00 18,090,300.00 78,090,300.00 18,090,300.00 4.997 179 Checking Account SYS725 125 BANK OF AMERICA 07/01/2007 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 1 Subtotal antl Average 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0 Treasury Securities -SLGS Demand SYS143 143 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 3,134,730.00 3,134,73000 3,134,730.00 3.840 3.840 1 Subtotal and Average 3,425,052.58 3,134,710.00 3,134,730.00 3,734,730.00 3.840 1 Total and Average 21,515,352.58 21,225,030.00 21,225,030.00 21,225,030.00 4.826 753 Run Hate: 091122007 - 12:00 Portfolio TAB CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRep16.41.202b ~ Report Ver. 5.00 RDA 2001 Tax Allocation Bonds Portfolio Management Page 3 Activity By Type August 1, 2007 through August 31, 2007 Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemp0ons Ending CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary) Subtotal 0.00 0.00 Treasury Securities -SLGS Subtotal 78,090,300.00 78,090,300.00 Checking Account (Monthly Summary) Subtotal 0.00 0.00 Treasury Securities -SLGS Demand (Monthly Summary) SVS143 143 TREASURY SLGS 3.840 0.00 1,800,000.00 Subtotal 4,934,730.00 0.00 1,800,000.00 3,134,730.00 Total 23,025,030.00 Run Dete. 0 9/1 212 0 0] -12:00 o.o0 7,soo,ooo.oo 21,225,030.00 Portfolio TAB CI~ PM (PRF PM3) SymRep1641.20F ~ Repon Ver. 5.00 RDA 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary August 31, 2007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity J60 Equiv. J65 Equiv. Local Agency Investment Fund 145,439.24 145,439.24 145,439.24 0.18 1 1 5.181 5.253 Wells Fargo Money Market Fund 78,752,554 79 76,752,554.79 76 752,554.79 99.82 1 1 3.916 3.970 78,897,994.03 78,897,994.03 78,897,994.03 100.00% 1 1 3.916 3.972 Investments Total Earnings August 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 298,403.94 586,422.89 Average Daily Balance 80,077,503.40 80,430,729.37 Effective Rate of Return 4.39% 4.29° This report accurately reflects the investment of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Project 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds proceeds in accordance with the Agency's supplemental indenture dated March 31, 2004. The Investment Program herein shown provides suffcienl cash flow liquidity to meet the public improvements schedule and funding requirements. Reporting period 08I01I2007-08131/2007 Run Date: 09112/2007 -12:25 Portfolio TAB4 CP PM (PRF PM1)SymRept641.20ID ~ Report Vet. 5.00 RDA 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds Portfolio Management Portfolio Details -Investments August 31, 2007 Page 2 Average Purchase SWted YTM Days to Maturlry CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Madcet Value Book Value Rate Mocdy's 365 Maturlry Date Local Agency Investment Fund SYS401 401 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 145,439.24 145,439.24 145439.24 5.253 5.253 1 Subtotal and Average 145,439.24 145,439.24 145,439.2d 145,439.24 5.253 1 Wells Fargo Money Market Fund SYS405 405 WELLS FARGO 78,752,554.79 78,752,554.79 78,752,554.79 3.970 3.970 1 Subtotal antl Average 79,926,064.16 78,752,554.79 78,752,554.79 78,752,554.79 3.970 1 Total and Average 60,071,503.40 78,897,994.03 78,897,994.0} 78,897,994.03 3.972 1 Run Dale: 09/12/2007 -12:25 Portfolio TA64 CP PM (PRF_PM2)SymRept641.202b ~ N Report Ver. 5 W RDA 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds Portfolio Management ' Activity By Type August 7, 2007 through August 31, 2007 Beginning Statetl Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending CUSIP Inveslment# Issuer Balance Rate Dale or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance Page 3 Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary) Subtotal 145,439.24 145,439.24 Wells Fargo Money MarketFund (Monthly Summary) SYS405 405 WELLS FARGO 3.970 287,373.65 1,500,000.00 Subtotal 79,965,181.14 287,J73.65 1,500,000.00 78,752,554.79 Total 80,110,620.38 Run Date: 09/12/2007 -12:25 287,373.65 1,500,000.00 78,897,994.OJ Portfolio TAB4 CIS .1 PM (PRF_PM3) BymRept 641.202 (~ Report Ver. 5 W `~ ." STAFF REPORT r- -~~r-~.~~ >_' , ENGINL,ERING DE]? ~1RT\~fENT Date: September 19, 2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Ty Quaintance, Facilities Superintendent Subject: APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE EMCOR SERVICE/MESA ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. (EMCOR SERVICE) TO CONTINUE AS THE SINGLE SOURCE SERVICE PROVIDER AND INSTALLER FOR HVAC/CONTROL WORK AND RELATED ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR CITY FACILITIES; APPROVE CONTRACT AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 FOR ADDITIONAL MONTHLY MAINTENANCE SCOPE OF WORK AT THE CULTURAL ARTS CENTER ($9,528.00) AND HVAC WATER TREATMENT FOR CULTURAL ARTS CENTER AND CENTRAL PARK ($2,560.00); APPROVE EXTRA WORK NOT TO EXCEED $150,000; AND APPROVE THE FOLLOWING CAPITAL MAINTENANCE PROJECTS APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY IN THE FY 2007/2008 BUDGET: HVAC MODIFICATIONS AT THE CIVIC CENTER FOR DEPARTMENT REMODELS ($80,000), HVAC UNIT FOR CENTRAL PARK COMPUTER ROOM ($81,000), AND PERFORM INDOOR AIR QUALITY MODIFICATIONS AS NEEDED AT CITY WIDE FACILITIES ($10,000); TO BE FUNDED FROM 1001312-5304 ($159,528), 2650801- 5602 ($80,000), 2650801-5603 ($81,000) and 1025001-5304 ($10,000) AND APPROPRIATE $80,000 INTO ACCOUNT NUMBER 2650801-5602 AND $81,000 INTO ACCOUNT NUMBER 2650801-5603 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve and authorize EMCOR Service/Mesa Energy Systems, Inc. (EMCOR Service) to continue as the single source service provider and installer for HVAC/control work and related energy management systems for city facilities; approve contract for amendment no. 1 for additional monthly maintenance scope of work at the Cultural Arts Center for HVAC Building Automation maintenance ($9,528.00) and HVAC water treatment for Cultural Arts Center and Central Park ($2560.00); approve extra work not to exceed $150,000; and approve the following capital maintenance projects approved by the City Council and Redevelopment Agency in the FY 2007/2008 budget: HVAC modifications at the Civic Center for department remodels ($80,000), HVAC unit for Central Park Computer room ($81,000), and perform indoor air quality modifications as needed at city-wide facilities ($10,000); to be funded from 1001312-5304 ($159,528), 2650801-5602 ($80,000), 2650801-5603 ($81,000) and 1025001-5304 ($10,000) and appropriate $80,000 into account number 2650801-5602 and $81,000 into account number 2650801-5603. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS P14 In August 2003, City Council approved EMCOR Service as the sole source provider of HVAC services for City facilities. EMCOR continues to provide cost effective, reliable and responsive service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Through routine meetings, project predevelopment and P15 EMCOR SERVICE/MESA ENERGY, CONTRACT AMENDMENT, EXTRA WORK AND CAPITAL PAGE 2 PROJECT APPROVAL SEPTEMBER 19,2007 proposals for referenced extra work, staff is able to ensure cost effective management of the City's HVAC systems. In addition, EMCOR continues to provide progressive energy savings strategies and preventive maintenance, assisting the City in efforts toward reducing energy consumption for the various buildings. One of the energy efficient capital projects Emcor completed during last year's budget was replacing the existing piston driven compressors at the Civic Center to Turbo core centrifugal driven compressors which requires up to forty percent less electricity and came with a twenty thousand dollar rebate from Southern California Edison. EMCOR has committed numerous staff to our account, including a Senior Account Manager, several technical staff, dispatch staff, 24 hour on-call services, building automation technicians, chiller mechanics, etc. Due to their extensive knowledge of our systems, their work on integration for the Citywide Facilities, the recent addition of the Fire Stations under HVAC contract and their continued dedication to providing value to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, EMCOR is uniquely qualified to remain as the single sole source vendor for HVAC and related Energy Management Systems. Contract Amendment No. 1 is being requested to add two additional scopes of work to EMCOR's regular monthly maintenance contract: 1. Water Treatment--This scope of work includes monthly water treatment of the HVAC systems for Central Park and the Cultural Arts Center for the purpose of maintaining the P.H. in the HVAC systems. 2. Cultural Arts Center HVAC Building Automation Equipment Maintenance-- This scope of work includes automation controls maintenance throughout the year and software upgrades as needed in addition to twenty hours a year business hours and after hours emergency automation service and unlimited technical support. EMCOR is holding their monthly maintenance pricing as well as the hourly rates for extra work to the original 2003 quote for service. In conclusion, staff recommends Council approve the amendment of this agreement and grant the City Engineer authority to renew said agreement at the conclusion of the agreement term if such a need is warranted. Resp tfully brnitt_ed ~ i~ ~ Q ~l/ ~~12 William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TO:dlw STAFF REPORT REDEVELOPMENI'AGENCY Date: September 19, 2007 RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA To: Chairman and Redevelopment Agency Members Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director From: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director By: Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner Subject: APPROVAL TO ACCEPT THE IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY CAREY SIGN GRAPHICS AND HUFCOR AIRWALL AT THE VICTORIA GARDENS CULTURAL CENTER AS COMPLETE; AUTHORIZATION TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS; AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND FOR EACH CONTRACT RECOMMENDATION That the Redevelopment Agency accept improvements constructed by Carey Sign Graphics and Hufcor Airwall at the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center located at 12505 Cultural Center Drive, as complete; authorize the filing of Notices of Completion for the improvements; and, authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond for each contract. BACKGROUND On August 18, 2004, construction contracts for various trades for the City of Rancho Cucamonga's first multi-prime construction project, the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center, were awarded by the Redevelopment Agency. The project is now complete and a Certificate of Occupancy was issued on August 14, 2006. Being amulti-prime project, the trade contracts have been closed out individually, and Notices of Completion have been filed for each contract. The following two contracts, along with the final contract amounts, are the final contracts to be completed. Carey Sign Graphics Hufcor Airwall $ 172,708.50 $ 99,378.00 P16 Services Director P17 RESOLUTION NO. RH o ~"c~~~J A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS COMPLETED BY CAREY SIGN GRAPHICS, FOR THE VICTORIA GARDENS CULTURAL CENTER PROJECT, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements by Carey Sign Graphics, for the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center Project, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Clerk is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino. P18 RESOLUTION NO. ~f} DT"D~d A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS COMPLETED BY HUFCOR AIRWALL., FOR THE VICTORIA GARDENS CULTURAL CENTER PROJECT, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements by Hufcor Airwall, for the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center Project, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Clerk is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Aeenda Check Re>?ister 8/29/2007 through 9/11/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00256644 8/29/2007 ADT SECURITY SERVICES INC 18.79 AP - 00256647 8/29/2007 AIRGAS WEST 289.56 AP - 00256650 8/29/2007 ALL CITIES TOOLS 36.64 AP - 00256650 8/29/2007 ALL CITIES TOOLS 43.95 AP - 00256658 8/29/2007 APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 1,093.50 AP - 00256658 8/29/2007 APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 1,184.28 AP - 00256668 8/29/2007 BARTEL ASSOCIATES LLC 4,150.00 AP - 00256680 8/29/2007 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES 47,931.21 AP - 00256694 8/29/2007 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 38.75 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,049.98 AP - 00256700 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20 AP - 00256704 8/29/2007 DAPPER TIRE CO 794.20 AP - 00256722 8/29/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 442.50 AP - 00256722 8/29/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 442.50 AP - 00256739 8/29/2007 INDEPENDENT ELECTRONICS 269.38 AP - 00256748 8/29/2007 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES 12.01 AP - 00256750 8/29/2007 KME FIRE APPARATUS 18.10 AP - 00256750 8/29/2007 KME FIRE APPARATUS 392.75 AP - 00256756 8/29/2007 LN CURTIS AND SONS 167.54 AP - 00256763 8/29/2007 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 252.96 AP - 00256768 8/29/2007 N F P A 210.28 AP - 00256768 8/29/2007 N F P A 1,137.87 AP - 00256768 8/29/2007 N F P A 420.72 AP - 00256769 8/29/2007 NAPA AUTO PARTS 2784 AP - 00256769 8/29/2007 NAPA AUTO PARTS 43.06 AP - 00256775 8/29/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 520.01 AP - 00256775 8/29/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 66.99 AP - 00256786 8/29/2007 PHENIX TECHNOLOGY INC. 158.01 AP - 00256792 8/29/2007 QUALITY TRUCK ELECTRIC INC 594.00 AP - 00256796 8/29/2007 RASMUSSEN, STEPHANIE 42.50 AP - 00256800 8/29/2007 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 2,158.00 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,803.62 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 878.21 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,506.08 AP - 00256842 8/29/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 48.22 AP - 00256850 8/29/2007 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 71.26 AP - 00256851 8/29/2007 VERIZON 32.99 AP - 00256851 8/29/2007 VERIZON 60.34 AP - 00256893 9/8/2007 BAB STEERING HYDRAULICS INC 288.23 AP - 0025691 I 9/5/2007 CADET UNIFORM SERVICE 262.84 AP - 00256911 9/8/2007 CADET UNIFORM SERVICE 258.92 AP - 00256911 9/8/2007 CADET UNIFORM SERVICE 169.72 AP - 00256911 9/8/2007 CADET UNIFORM SERVICE 152.64 AP - 00256911 9/5/2007 CADET UNIFORM SERVICE 264.90 AP - 00256911 9/8/2007 CADET UNIFORM SERVICE 179.01 AP - 00256911 9/8/2007 CADET UNIFORM SERVICE 171.21 AP - 00256926 9/5/2007 CHIEF SUPPLY 110.97 AP - 00256942 9/5/2007 DOUG BELL TREASURER 100.00 AP - 00256958 9/8/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 442.50 AP - 00256983 9/8/2007 HOSE MAN INC 38.69 AP - 00257011 9/5/2007 L S A ASSOCIATES INC ],882.28 AP - 00257012 9/5/2007 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 551.81 AP - 00257019 9/8/2007 LN CURTIS AND SONS 2,083.83 AP - 00257024 9/5/2007 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE INC 14.91 P19 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Date: 09/12/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 10:26:3 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P20 Agenda Check Resister 8/29/2007 through 9/I 1/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00257024 9/5/2007 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE INC 7.05 AP - 00257032 9/5/2007 MCI 8.00 AP - 00257043 9/5/2007 NAPA AUTO PARTS 64.64 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 12.78 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 444.39 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 205.68 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT -12.78 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 0.56 AP - 00257090 9/5/2007 RAULS AUTO TRIM INC 484.88 AP - 00257092 9/5/2007 RAYNE WATER CONDITIONING INC 22.95 AP - 00257098 9/5/2007 RIO HONDO COLLEGE 80.00 AP - 00257114 9/5/2007 SEYMOUR, RONALD 486.89 AP - 00257120 9/5/2007 SIGNCRAFTERS OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 154.65 AP - 00257122 9/5/2007 SMART AND FINAL 83.75 AP - 00257122 9/5/2007 SMART AND FINAL 38.33 AP - 00257122 9/5/2007 SMART AND FINAL 38.33 AP - 00257122 9/5/2007 SMART AND FINAL 167.50 AP - 00257125 9/5/2007 SONETICS CORPORATION 1,112.58 AP - 00257142 9/5/2007 SUNSET PRINTING AND ADV SPEC CO 696.09 AP - 00257159 9/5/2007 ULTIMATE OFFICE 137.29 AP - 00257161 9/5/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 48.22 AP - 00257169 9/5/2007 UNITED TRANSMISSION EXCHANGE LLC 2,747.07 AP - 00257169 9/5/2007 UNITED TRANSMISSION EXCHANGE LLC 2,349.26 AP - 00257172 9/5/2007 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC -168.92 AP - 00257172 9/5/2007 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC 251.10 AP - 00257174 9/5/2007 VAN GAALEN INC 701.87 AP - 00257174 9/5/2007 VAN GAALEN INC 110.00 AP - 00257178 9/5/2007 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 956.13 AP - 00257178 9/5/2007 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 124.35 AP - 00257178 9/5/2007 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 155.33 AP - 00257178 9/5/2007 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 717.89 AP - 00257178 9/5/2007 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 82.92 AP - 00257178 9/5/2007 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 265.88 AP - 00257179 9/5/2007 VERIZON 461.78 AP - 00257179 9/5/2007 VERIZON 31.93 AP - 00257179 9/5/2007 VERIZON 31.93 AP-00257]79 9/5/2007 VERIZON 21.33 AP - 00257179 9/5/2007 VERIZON 461.78 AP - 00257179 9/5/2007 VERIZON 461.78 AP - 00257179 9/5/2007 VERIZON 461.78 AP - 00257179 9/5/2007 VERIZON 21.32 AP - 00257185 9/5/2007 WAXIE SAN[TARY SUPPLY 9.65 AP - 00257]85 9/5/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 89.40 AP - 00257]85 9/5/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 76.49 AP - 00257185 9/5/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 63.58 AP - 00257185 9/5/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 114.74 AP - 00257185 9/5/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 63.58 AP - 00257185 9/5/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 38.27 AP - 00257185 9/5/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 50.66 AP - 00257197 9/5/2007 ZOLL DATA SYSTEMS INC 3,150.00 AP - 00257197 9/5/2007 ZOLL DATA SYSTEMS INC 3,150.00 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,304.92 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 628.99 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Current Dale: 09/12/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:26:3 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Aeenda Check Resister 8/29/2007 through 9/I 1/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Total for Check ID AP: Total for Entity: User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout P21 Amount 99,674.80 99,674.80 Current Date: 09/12/200 Time: 10:26:3 Par Investments Value City of Rancho Cucamonga Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. Local Agency Investment Funtl 3,495,916.33 3,495,916.33 3,495,91fi.33 Passbook/Checking Accounts 145,578.77 145,578.77 145,578.77 Fetleral Agency Issues-Coupon 5,000,000.00 5,008,135.84 4,998,400.00 Investments R. C. Fire Protection District Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary August 37, 2007 8,641,495.10 8,649,630.94 8,639,895.10 40.46 1 1 5.181 5.253 1.68 1 1 0.197 0.200 57.85 840 676 5.174 5.24fi 100.00% 486 391 5.093 5.164 Total Earnings August 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 43,865.35 92,236.71 Average Daily Balance 10,087,812.77 10,600,712.81 Effective Rate of Return 5.12 % 5.12 I certify that this report accurately reflects all District pooled investments and is in conformity with the investment policy adopted December 20, 2006. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides suffcient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The attached State of California Pooled o Investment Account (LAIF) statement is provided under the City and State official Investment Policy and represents the monthly source of valuation (or the prior month's end. John R. Glllison, Treasurer Reporting period OBI01I2007-O6I31I2007 Run Date: 09/122007 -12:26 Portfolio FIRE CP PM (PRF_PM1I SymRept 6 41.202b Report var. s ao N N R. C. Fire Protection District Portfolio Management page p Portfolio Details -Investments August 31, 2007 Average Purchase Staletl YTM Days to Maturlry CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Mootly's 360 Maturity Date Local Agency Investment Fund SYS0001 0001 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 3,495,916.33 3,495,916.33 3,495,916.33 5.253 5.181 1 Subtotal and Average 4,918,496.98 3,d95,916.33 3,495,916.33 3,495,916.33 5.181 ~ 1 PassbooklChecking Accounts SYS0002 0002 BANK OF AMERICA 145,578.77 145,578.77 145,578.77 0.200 0.197 1 Subtotal and Average 170,915.79 145,578.77 145,578.77 145,578.77 0.197 1 Federal Agency Issues -Coupon 3133XKT96 1006 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/14/2007 2,000,000.00 2,001,875.00 1,999,000.00 5.125 5.081 621 05/14/2009 3128XSC30 1005 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MTG CORP 02/13/2007 3,000,000.00 3,006,260.84 2,999,400.00 5.300 5.236 712 08/13/2009 Subtotal and Average 4,998,400.00 5,000,000.00 6,008,135.84 4,998,400.00 5.174 676 Total antl Average 10,087,812.77 Run Dale: 09112/2007 - 12'.26 8,641,495.10 8,649,670.94 8,639,895.10 5.093 391 Portfolio FIRE CP PM (PRF_PM2) 6ymRept 6.41.202b N W Repon Ver. 5.00 R. C. Fire Protection District Portfolio Management Pa e3 g Activity By Type August 1, 2007 through August 31, 2007 Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Retlemptlons Ending CUSIP Investment p Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary) SVS0001 0001 LOCAL AGENCYINVESTMENT FUND 5.253 000 2,250,000.00 Subtotal 5,745,916.33 0.00 2,250,000.00 3,495,916.33 PassbooklChecking Accounts (Monthly Summary) SYS0002 0002 BANK OF AMERICA 0.200 0.00 26,181.59 Subtotal 171,760.36 0.00 26,181.59 145,578.77 Federal Agency Issues-Coupon Subtotal 4,998,x00.00 ~ 4,998,400.00 Total 10,916,076.69 0.00 2,276,181.59 8,639,895.10 Run Date'. 09/12/200] - 12:26 Portfolio FIRE CI N PM (PRF_PM3) SymRepl 6 41.205 ~ Report Ver. 5.00 P25 Pooled State of California Money Investment Account Market Valuation 7/31 /2007 Description Carrying Cost Plus Accrued Interest Purch. Fair Value Accrued Interest United States Treasury: Bills $ 3,129,456,805.44 $ 3,160,772,000.00 NA Notes $ - $ - $ - Federal Agency: SBA $ 627,502,821.51 $ 621,330,047.40 $ 5,840,326.37 MBS $ 852,276,465.75 $ 838,111,906.83 $ 3,952,377.86 Bonds $ 6,552,973,170.07 $ 6,554,173,616.90 $ 98,367,837.31 Floaters $ 644,862,433.82 $ 644,996,000.00 $ 2,021,533.33 Discount Notes $ 6,718,395,095.68 $ 6,769,299,400.00 NA FHLMC PC $ 429,566.90 $ 442,148.92 $ 6,984.32 GNMA $ 206,287.74 $ 229,780.92 $ 2,049.50 Bankers Acceptances $ - $ - NA Bank Notes $ 1,200,000,000.00 $ 1,199,815,722.00 $ 18,925,166.65 CDs $ 13,084,418,192.11 $ 13,081,708,793.03 $ 137,325,284.99 Commercial Paper $ 11,303,512,257.15 $ 11,370,993,013.89 NA Corporate: Floaters $ 119,024,753.95 $ 118,907,100.00 $ 949,159.31 Bonds $ 256,206,642.23 $ 255,228,518.94 $ 3,488,807.89 Repurchase Agreements $ - NA Reverse Repurchase $ (447,900,000.00) $ (447,900,000.00) $ (1,125,769.79) Time Deposits $ 8,698,495,000.00 $ 8,698,495,000.00 NA AB 55 & GF Loans $ 8,505,518,772.40 $ 8,505,518,772.40 NA TOTAL $ 61,245,378,264.75 $ 61,372,121,821.23 $ 269,753,757.74 Fair Value Including Accrued Interest $ 61,641,875,578.97 Repurchase Agreements, Time Deposits, AB 55 & General Fund loans, and Reverse Repurchase agreements are carried at portfolio book value (carrying cost). STAFF REPORT RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Date: September 19, 2007 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II P26 ,~~ RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: DIAMONDINDUSTRIES-APN0209-192-07,08,09,10,11&12-SPECIAL ELECTION RESULTS PERTAINING TO ANNEXATION N0.07-0 RECOMMENDATION Consideration of approval of a resolution declaring results of a special election in Community Facilities District No. 85-1, Annexation No. 07-6 (a proposal to build 2 industrial buildings totaling 18,527 sq. ft. on 1.4 acres). BACKGROUND On July 18, 2007, the Board declared its intention to annex APNs 0209-192-07,08,09,10,11&12 into CFD No. 85-1. On August 15, 2007, a public hearing was held regarding the annexation and called for a special election. A special election was scheduled for August 22, 2007, after the adoption of the resolution declaring the annexation. On August 22, 2007, the landowner submitted their ballot to the Board Secretary. The Board Secretary has canvassed the ballot and completed the statement of votes cast (see Exhibit "A" of Resolution). The Landowner cast their vote unanimously in favor of the levy of the special tax in the Annexed Territory. Adoption of this resolution constitutes the formal action of the Board declaring the results of the election and directs the recordation of an amendment to the existing Notice of Special Tax Lien. By recordation of this amendment, prospective purchasers of property within the Annexed Territory will have notice of the special tax obligation affecting such property. Respectfully submitted, P.~Mvy~ Peter M. Bryan Fire Chief Attachment P27 RESOLUTION NO. FD 07- OJr© A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ANNEXATION NO. 07-6 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors (the "Board") of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, California, has previously declared its intention and held and conducted proceedings relating to the .annexation of territory to an existing Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and specifically Article 3.5 thereof. The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (the "District"); and, WHEREAS, the area proposed to be annexed is known and designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ANNEXATION NO. 07-6 ("Annexed Territory"), and, WHEREAS, the Board did call for and order to be held an election to submit to the qualified voters of the Annexed Territory a proposition to levy a special tax in the Annexed Territory; and, WHEREAS, at this time said election has been held and the measure voted upon did receive the favorable 2/3's vote of the qualified voters, and the Board desires to declare the favorable results of the election. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. The Board hereby receives and approves the CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL AND STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST, as submitted by the Election Official, said Statement setting forth the number of votes case in the election, the measure voted upon, and the number of votes given for and/or against the measure voted upon. A copy of said Certificate and Statement is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", referenced and so incorporated. SECTION 3. The Secretary is hereby directed to enter in the minutes of this meeting the results of the election and the STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST. SECTION 4. The Board hereby further determines that the Board is now authorized to levy the special taxes within the Annexed Territory as approved and authorized by the qualified electors of the Annexed Territory. SECTION 5. Immediately upon adoption of this Resolution, the AMENDMENT TO THE NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN (NOTICE OF ANNEXATION) shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. P28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _ day of , 2007. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., President ATTEST: ra J. Adams, Secretary I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the _ day of 2007. Executed this day of 2007, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, Secretary P29 CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL AND STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) .. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )SS RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ) THE UNDERSIGNED, AS ELECTION OFFICIAL OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CAL~'ORNIA, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that pursuant to the provisions of Section 53326 of the Government Code and the Elections Code of the State of California, I did canvass the returns of the votes cast at the: RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. SS-1 ANNEXATION NO. 07-6 SPECIAL ELECTION In said Fire Protection District held on August 22, 2007 I FURTHER CERTIFY that this Statement of Votes Cast shows the whole number ofvotes case in said District, and the whole number of votes cast for the Measure in said District, and the totals of the respective columns and the totals as shown for the Measure are full, true and correct. I. TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTES CAST: II. TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTES FOR FOR AND AGAINST PROPOSITION A AGAINST WITNESS my hand and official Seal this ~~ day of~ (/ Ws~007. 7 Election Offi a Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District State of California t, ~~ R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A F I R E PROTECTION D I S T R I C T Staff Report DATE September 19, 2007 TO President and Members of the Board of Directors Jadc Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief BY: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE FIRE AGENCIES INSURANCE RISK AUTHORITY (FAIRA) AMENDING ARTICLE 21 AND ARTICLE 27 OF THE FOURTH AMENDED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT RECOMMENDATION Approval of amendments to the Fire Agencies Insurance Risk Authority (FAIRA) Fourth Amended Joint Powers Agreement amending Article 21 to change the withdrawal of members notice from 120 days to 12 months advance written notice and amending Article 27 to only require the approval of a majority of the Member Agencies which vote on a proposed amendment, so long as not less than 51 % of the Member Agencies have voted. BACKGROUND The Rancho Cucamonga Fire District is one of eleven charter members of FAIRA which formed in 1989 in order to provide its member agencies aself-insurance program for general liability, property, motor vehicle and such other forms of insurance coverage as agreed upon by the Authority after its formation. As with any business group, from time to time the changing dynamics of the public agency insurance pooling business requires FAIRA to consider changes as well. FAIRA is coming up on its 20'h anniversary and has only made four amendments to the original JPA. In April 1993, the Fire District Board approved a second amended Joint Powers Agreement which established aSelf-Insurance Retention (SIR) program for general liability, property, and vehicular insurance coverage for all members. In July 1995, the Fire District Board approved a third amended JPA and By-Laws which modified the procedure for the election of directors to the governing board to provide for regular and recurring elections. In July 2005, The Fire District Board approved a fourth amended JPA to expand the Board from 11 to 13 members. P30 I:\Clerical\Word Processing Docs\Staff Reports\FAIRA Amend Articles 21 & 27.doc P31 At the Annual Board Meeting on June 8, 2007, the Board approved, with the recommendation of management, that the following changes offered were advisable and to the benefit of the Membership at large. Article 21. Withdrawal -Amend the withdrawal of members notice from 120 days advance written notice to 12 months. The Board of Directors has determined that a longer advance notice provision would enable the Authority to manage its affairs in a more efficient manner. Article 27. Amendment to Agreement -Amend the requirement of a majority of the membership' of the Authority to approve an amendment to the JPA Agreement to only require the approval of a majority of the Member Agencies which vote on a proposed amendment, so long as not less than 51% of the Member Agencies have voted. The Board of Directors has determined that a more simplified process for amending the Joint Powers Agreement would enable the Authority to manage its affairs in a more efficient manner. FAIRA is awell-funded, stable and mature insurance pool. Over 85% of its Members have been in the Pool for 14 years and more. These Amendments are intended to promote and continue FAIRA's stability and give the Membership more flexibility to meet today's changing insurance market demands. Respectfully submitted, Peter .Bryan Fire Chief P32 RESOLUTION NO. FD 07- O/ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE 21 OF THE FOURTH AMENDED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT OF THE FIRE AGENCIES INSURANCE RISK AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District is a member agency of the "Fire Agencies Insurance Risk Authority" (FAIRA); and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of FAIRA, at its meeting of June 8, 2007, approved an amendment to the text of the Fourth Amended Joint Powers Agreement to modify the language contained in Article 21 (Withdrawal of Members); and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of FAIRA has recommended that each of the Member Agencies consider and approve the amendment to Article 21; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District has considered the proposed text amendment to Article 21 of the Fourth Amended Joint Powers Agreement and desired to give approval to the proposed, amended language. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District as follows: 1. The proposed changes to Article 21 (Amendment to Agreement) of the Fourth Amended Joint Powers Agreement, as recommended by the FAIRA Board of Directors, and as shown in Exhibit "A" attached herewith to this Resolution, is hereby approved. 2. The Chairman of the Board of Directors is hereby authorized to execute a "Fifth Amended Joint Powers Agreement," which includes the changes to Article 21 approved herewith, at such time as the Fifth Amended Joint Powers Agreement is presented for signature. 3. The President or the Fire Chief of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District is hereby directed to notify FAIRA of the adoption of this Resolution and is further directed to provide a copy of this Resolution and return the attached Ballot to FAIRA. P33 Resolution No. FD 07- 05! Page 2 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this _ day of , 2007. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., President ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, Secretary I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a Regular Meeting of said Board held on the day of 2007. Executed this day of 2007, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, Secretary P34 EXIIIBIT "A" ARTICLE 21. WITHDRAWAL (a) A Member may withdraw from membership in the Authority upon advance written notice delivered to the Authority no later than twelve (12) months prior to the end of a Coverage Period; provided that the Liability Risk Coverage Agreement or another Insurance Program Agreement may set forth additional conditions to withdrawal. A Member which no longer participates in any Insurance Program of the Authority, by reason of expulsion from an Inswance Program or otherwise, shall be deemed to have withdrawn from this Agreement and shall no longer be a party to this agreement. No withdrawal, however, shall relieve such Member from its obligations under any outstanding agreements except in accordance with such agreements. P35 RESOLUTION NO. FD 07- O5 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE 27 OF THE FOURTH AMENDED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT OF THE FIRE AGENCIES INSURANCE RISK AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District is a member agency of the "Fire Agencies Insurance Risk Authority" (FAIRA); and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of FAIRA, at its meeting of June 8, 2007, approved an amendment to the text of the Fourth Amended Joint Powers Agreement to modify the language contained in Article 27 (Amendment to Agreement); and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of FAIRA has recommended that each of the Member Agencies consider and approve the amendment to Article 27; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District has considered the proposed text amendment to Article 27 of the Fourth Amended Joint Powers Agreement and desires to give approval to the proposed, amended language. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District as follows: 1. The proposed changes to Article 27 (Amendment to Agreement) of the Fourth Amended Joint Powers Agreement, as recommended by the FAIRA Board of Directors, and as shown in Exhibit "A" attached herewith to this Resolution, is hereby approved. 2. The Chairman of the Board of Directors is hereby authorized to execute a "Fifth Amended Joint Powers Agreement," which includes the changes to Article 27 approved herewith, at such time as the Fifth Amended Joint Powers Agreement is presented for signature. 3. The President or the Fire Chief of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District is hereby directed to notify FAIRA of the adoption of this Resolution and is further directed to provide a copy of this Resolution and return the attached Ballot to FAIRA. P36 Resolution No. FD 07- ~ 5z Page 2 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this _ day of , 2007. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., President ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, Secretary I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a Regular Meeting of said Board held on the day of 2007. Executed this day of 2007, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, Secretary P37 EXHIBIT "A" ARTICLE 27. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT This At,Reement may be amended from time to time with the consent of a majority of the Member Agencies voting on the proposed amendment, so long as not less than 51 % of the Member Agencies have voted, acting through their legislative bodies, and in compliance with all applicable requirements of the Joint Powers Law. Any amendment of this Agreement shall become effective upon receipt by the Authority of notice of the approval of such amendment by the legislative bodies of a majority of the Member Agencies voting on the proposed amendment, so long as not less than 51% of the Member Agencies have voted, and satisfaction of the applicable requirements of the Joint Powers Law. P38 BALLOT ELECTION ON AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLES 21 & 27 OF THE FAIRA JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District a memberofFAIIZA, hereby votes on the following amendments listed below. Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ,has authorized the election by resolution(s) of the Board made and passed on 2007. Designation of vote: Amendments: Yes No Amend Article 21 relating to the withdrawal of members to require 12 months advance written notice to the Authority by a withdrawing member. Amend Article 27 relating to the amendment of the Joint Powers Agreement to require the approval of a majority of the Member Agencies which vote on a proposed amendment, so long as not less than 51% of the Member Agencies have voted. Dated: ATTEST: 2007 a a a Chairman/Authority Board or Designated Person Authority Board Clerk or Designated Person CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 8/29/2007 through 9/11/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00256637 8/29/2007 A&V SOFTBALL 3,312.00 AP - 00256638 8/29/2007 ABC LOCKSMITHS 113.14 AP - 00256639 8/29/2007 ABLAC 16.39 AP - 00256640 8/29/2007 ABLETRONICS 65.20 AP - 00256641 8/29/2007 ACCOUNTAX 35.47 AP - 00256642 8/29/2007 ACTION AWARDS INC. 100.44 AP - 00256643 8/29/2007 ADDINGTON, MATTHEW 250.00 AP - 00256645 8/29/2007 ADVANTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS 24.00 AP - 00256645 8/29/2007 ADVANTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS 24.00 AP - 00256645 8/29/2007 ADVANTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS 24.00 AP - 00256645 8/29/2007 ADVANTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS 24.00 AP - 00256645 8/29/2007 ADVANTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS 24.00 AP - 00256646 8/29/2007 AEI-CASC ENGINEERING INC. 9,326.25 AP-00256647 8/29/2007 AIRGASWEST 1,885.57 AP - 00256648 8/29/2007 ALEXANDER HAMILTON INSTITUTE INC. 38.45 AP - 00256649 8/29/2007 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 168,294.13 AP - 00256649 8/29/2007 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT -16,829.41 AP - 00256650 8/29/2007 ALL CITIES TOOLS 244.59 AP - 00256650 8/29/2007 ALL CITIES TOOLS 157.10 AP - 00256651 8/29/2007 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 2,229.92 AP - 00256652 8/29/2007 ALL WELDING 829.65 AP - 00256653 8/29/2007 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 511.28 AP - 00256653 8/29/2007 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 619.55 AP - 00256653 8/29/2007 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 599.50 AP - 00256654 8/29/2007 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO 25.50 AP - 00256655 8/29/2007 AMERICA WEST LANDSCAPE INC 19,429.52 AP - 00256656 8/29/2007 AMS PAVING INC 149.38 AP - 00256657 8/29/2007 ANDERSON, ELSIE 65.00 AP - 00256659 8/29/2007 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35 AP - 00256659 8/29/2007 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35 AP - 00256660 8/29/2007 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 103.50 AP - 00256661 8/29/2007 ARMENDARIZ, LISA M. 20.00 AP - 00256662 8/29/2007 ARROW TRAILER SUPPLIES INC 3222 AP - 00256663 8/29/2007 ASSI SECURITY 165.00 AP - 00256664 8/29/2007 AUFBAU CORPORATION 8,058.00 AP - 00256664 8/29/2007 AUFBAU CORPORATION 12,600.00 AP - 00256665 8/29/2007 AUTO SPECIALISTS 75.89 AP - 00256666 8/29/2007 AVANTS, MARGE 60.00 AP - 00256666 8/29/2007 AVANTS, MARGE 60.00 AP - 00256668 8/29/2007 BARTEL ASSOCIATES LLC 2,680.00 AP - 00256669 8/29/2007 BEACON PLUMBING 257.89 AP - 00256670 8/29/2007 BEARINGS AND DRIVES INC 731.16 AP - 00256671 8/29/2007 BEI BETTER ENERGY IDEAS 185.00 AP - 00256672 8/29/2007 BONGARDE HOLDINGS INC. 266.95 AP - 00256672 8/29/2007 BONGARDE HOLDINGS INC. 40.00 AP - 00256673 8/29/2007 BONNEVILLE STEEL INC. 110.00 AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. 106.66 AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. 106.65 AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. 100.72 AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. 100.72 AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. 9928 AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. 174.52 AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. 174.52 AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. 174.53 P39 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Date: 09/12/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:17:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Asenda Check Resister 8/29/2007 through 9/11/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoun[ AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. 100.72 AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. 99.27 AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. 126.05 AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. 116.35 AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. 184.22 AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. 100.72 AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. 164.83 AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. 87.27 AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. 106.65 AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. 198.76 AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. 122.43 AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. 77.57 AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. ]06.65 AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. 174.52 AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. 155.12 AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. 174.51 AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. 184.21 AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. 99.27 AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. 99.27 AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. 99.27 AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. 200.00 AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. 77.56 AP - 00256674 8/29/2007 BOOT WORLD INC. 200.00 AP - 00256675 8/29/2007 BOTTLE FREE WATER CO. 445.22 AP - 00256676 8/29/2007 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 9,600.00 AP - 00256676 8/29/2007 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 303.59 AP - 00256676 8/29/2007 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 6,936.14 AP - 00256676 8/29/2007 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 10,387.66 AP - 00256676 8/29/2007 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 379.14 AP - 00256676 8/29/2007 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 19,000.00 AP - 00256676 8/29/2007 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 1,308.14 AP - 00256676 8/29/2007 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 78.40 AP - 00256677 8/29/2007 CALIFORNIA CITY MANAGEMENT FOUNDATIC 375.00 AP - 00256678 8/29/2007 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL UTILITY ASSOC 40.00 AP - 00256679 8/29/2007 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL REVENUE & TAX AS8 25.00 AP - 00256680 8/29/2007 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES 97,787.58 AP - 00256682 8/29/2007 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 6,388.00 AP - 00256683 8/29/2007 CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 7,098.00 AP - 00256654 8/29/2007 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT 3,747.00 AP - 00256685 8/29/2007 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT 5,000.00 AP - 00256686 8/29/2007 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00 AP - 00256687 8/29/2007 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 45,391.13 AP - 00256688 8/29/2007 CLASSE PARTY RENTALS 91.80 AP - 00256689 8/29/2007 CLIMATEC BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES GROUP 510.00 AP - 00256690 8/29/2007 CMS INC 1,231.92 AP - 00256691 8/29/2007 COLLETTE, PETE 10.00 AP - 00256692 8/29/2007 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 216.04 AP - 00256692 8/29/2007 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 171.39 AP - 00256692 8/29/2007 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 34.06 AP - 00256693 S/29/2007 COMMUNITY BANK 16,829.41 AP - 00256694 8/29/2007 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 38.75 AP - 00256694 8/29/2007 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 867.01 AP - 00256695 8/29/2007 CREATIVE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS INC 1,750.00 AP - 00256696 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA ESTATES 52 LLC 5,220.00 P40 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Current Date: 09/12/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 10:17:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA At=enda Check Register 8/29/2007 through 9/11/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoun[ AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 79.98 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 678.91 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 125.20 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 196.12 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 112.15 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 142.74 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 132.10 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 413.81 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 234.69 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 114.99 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,167.02 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 474.24 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 98.51 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 251.98 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 194.48 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 319.38 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 225.38 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 527.29 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 234.69 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 360.61 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 282.57 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 123.87 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 303.85 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 194.49 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 681.39 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 132.28 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 495.19 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,034.00 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 530.85 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 306.08 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 416.47 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 302.09 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 291.45 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,272.09 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,470.26 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 455.29 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 569.42 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 499.36 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,140.42 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,072.59 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,188.30 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 535.27 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 384.98 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 939.16 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 331.35 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 322.47 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 157.55 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 646.56 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 57.62 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,887.88 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 124.85 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 52.30 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 419.38 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 466.11 P41 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Date: 09/12/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:17:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P42 Asenda Check Resister 8/29/2007 through 9/11/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 107.91 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 558.78 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 151.80 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,425.04 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 92.20 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 89.54 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 81.56 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 248.89 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 224.95 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 183.72 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 69.59 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 177.50 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 568.34 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,683.96 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 128.11 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 253.31 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 240.91 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 138.50 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 45.65 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 154.89 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 133.61 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 222.29 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,472.92 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 243.82 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 653.64 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 183.72 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,503.51 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1.398.44 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,067.27 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,026.04 ' AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,105.84 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 862.45 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 544.58 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 327.79 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 297.02 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 944.48 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 650.80 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 596.02 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 349.97 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 522.87 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 347.31 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 149.27 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 149.26 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 310.50 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 511.33 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 736.10 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 223.62 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 98.51 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 474.23 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 480.31 AP - 00256699 8/29/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 66.73 AP - 00256701 8/29/2007 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 1,546.22 AP - 00256702 8/29/2007 D.C. EPPLE TRUCKING INC. 11.10 AP - 00256703 8/29/2007 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 6,295.00 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 4 Current Date: 09/12/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:17:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 8/29/2007 through 9/11/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00256704 8/29/2007 DAPPER TIRE CO 1,627.77 AP - 00256704 8/29/2007 DAPPER TIRE CO 902.72 AP - 00256704 8/29/2007 DAPPER TIRE CO 494.81 AP - 00256705 8/29/2007 DELTA MICROIMAGING INC 4,846.31 AP - 00256705 8/29/2007 DELTA MICROIMAGING INC 3,533.50 AP - 00256705 8/29/2007 DELTA MICROIMAGING INC 6,557.76 AP - 00256706 8/29/2007 DENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 133.20 AP - 00256707 8/29/2007 DGO AUTO DETAILING 220.00 AP - 00256708 8/29/2007 DMJM HARRIS 21,604.72 AP - 00256709 8/29/2007 DOORKEYPER INC. 115.00 AP - 00256710 8/29/2007 ECONOLITE CONTROL PRODUCTS INC 150.00 AP - 00256711 8/29/2007 ELLISON-SCHNEIDER & HARRIS L.L.P. 3,404.00 AP - 00256712 8/29/2007 EMCOR SERVICE 10,152.91 AP - 00256712 8/29/2007 EMCOR SERVICE 4,412.51 AP - 00256713 8/29/2007 ESGIL CORPORATION 18,845.62 AP - 00256714 8/29/2007 ESPINO'S COP SHOP INC 90.00 AP - 00256714 8/29/2007 ESPINO'S COP SHOP INC 206.94 AP - 00256714 8/29/2007 ESPINO'S COP SHOP INC 90.00 AP - 00256714 8/29/2007 ESPINO'S COP SHOP INC 206.94 AP - 00256715 8/29/2007 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 511.14 AP - 00256716 8/29/2007 EXPERIAN 50.00 AP - 00256717 8/29/2007 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 135.26 AP - 00256717 8/29/2007 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 45.59 AP - 00256717 8/29/2007 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY -37.93 AP - 00256717 8/29/2007 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY -23.22 AP - 00256718 8/29/2007 F S MOTOR SPORTS INC 2,663.07 AP - 00256718 8/29/2007 F S MOTOR SPORTS INC 5,675.48 AP - 00256719 8/29/2007 F S MOTOR SPORTS INC 1,642.78 AP - 00256720 8/29/2007 FASTENAL COMPANY 117.77 AP - 00256720 8/29/2007 FASTENAL COMPANY 10.39 AP - 00256720 8/29/2007 FASTENAL COMPANY 138.73 AP - 00256720 8/29/2007 FASTENAL COMPANY 147.14 AP - 00256721 8/29/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 23.39 AP - 00256722 8/29/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 415.13 AP - 00256723 8/29/2007 FORD OF UPLAND INC 55.00 AP - 00256723 8/29/2007 FORD OF UPLAND INC 348.49 AP - 00256723 8/29/2007 FORD OF UPLAND INC 54.26 AP - 00256723 8/29/2007 FORD OF UPLAND INC 87.45 AP - 00256723 8/29/2007 FORD OF UPLAND INC 945.83 AP - 00256723 8/29/2007 FORD OF UPLAND INC 1,600.90 AP - 00256723 8/29/2007 FORD OF UPLAND INC 1,141.59 AP - 00256723 8/29/2007 FORD OF UPLAND INC 22.50 AP - 00256723 8/29/2007 FORD OF UPLAND INC 450.92 AP - 00256723 8/29/2007 FORD OF UPLAND INC 734.24 AP - 00256723 8/29/2007 FORD OF UPLAND INC 279.98 AP - 00256723 8/29/2007 FORD OF UPLAND INC 627.15 AP - 00256723 8/29/2007 FORD OF UPLAND INC 725.41 AP - 00256723 8/29/2007 FORD OF UPLAND INC 25.21 AP - 00256723 8/29/2007 FORD OF UPLAND INC -85.29 AP - 00256724 8/29/2007 FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT 12,500.00 AP - 00256725 8/29/2007 FROELICH INC., W.C. 32.40 AP - 00256726 8/29/2007 GEOGRAPHICS 460.00 AP-00256726 8/29/2007 GEOGRAPHICS 1,859.77 AP - 00256727 8/29/2007 GRAINGER 101.84 P43 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 5 Current Date: 09/12/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 10:17:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P44 Agenda Check Rel=ister 8/29/2007 through 9/1 ]/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00256727 8/29/2007 GRAINGER 88.95 AP - 00256727 8/29/2007 GRAINGER 62.89 AP - 00256727 8/29/2007 GRAINGER 559.06 AP - 00256727 8/29/2007 GRAINGER 43.21 AP - 00256727 8/29/2007 GRAINGER 83.01 AP - 00256728 8/29/2007 HADCO AUTO SERVICE 50.00 AP - 00256729 8/29/2007 HADDON, DAWN 969.27 AP - 00256730 8/29/2007 HAMILTON, MONIQUE 225.00 AP - 00256731 8/29/2007 HANSON, BARRYE 25.00 AP - 00256732 8/29/2007 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 569.97 AP - 00256732 8/29/2007 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY -42.00 AP - 00256733 8/29/2007 HEARTSAVERS LLC 162.31 AP - 00256734 8/29/2007 HEATH & ASSOCIATES, RICHARD 5,345.00 AP - 00256735 8/29/2007 HILTON GARDEN INN 97.90 AP - 00256735 8/29/2007 HILTON GARDEN INN 979.00 AP - 00256735 8/29/2007 HILTON GARDEN INN 97.90 AP - 00256735 8/29/2007 HILTON GARDEN INN 195.80 AP - 00256735 8/29/2007 HILTON GARDEN INN 195.80 AP - 00256736 8/29/2007 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 893.25 AP - 00256737 8/29/2007 HOSE MAN INC 104.96 AP - 00256737 8/29/2007 HOSE MAN INC 799.91 AP - 00256737 8/29/2007 HOSE MAN INC 6777 AP - 00256738 8/29/2007 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 244.38 AP - 00256740 8/29/2007 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRAA'SPORTATIC 863.00 AP - 00256741 8/29/2007 INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC 16.50 AP - 00256741 8/29/2007 INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC 136.50 AP - 00256741 8/29/2007 INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC 52.50 AP - 00256741 8/29/2007 INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC 102.00 AP - 00256742 8/29/2007 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 213.57 AP - 00256742 8/29/2007 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 55.76 AP - 00256742 8/29/2007 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 187.94 AP - 00256743 8/29/2007 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND INC 110.00 AP - 00256744 8/29/2007 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 1,562.38 AP - 00256745 8/29/2007 J J KELLER AND ASSOC INC 384.45 AP - 00256745 8/29/2007 J I KELLER AND ASSOC INC 856.62 AP - 00256746 8/29/2007 LOBS AVAILABLE INC 122.40 AP - 00256747 8/29/2007 JONES, ROBERT 2,450.00 AP - 00256747 8/29/2007 JONES, ROBERT 32.31 AP - 00256749 8/29/2007 KELLY EQUIPMENT 586.88 AP - 00256751 8/29/2007 LAM, JACK 100.00 AP - 00256752 8/29/2007 LASTING IMAGES LANDSCAPE 10,830.40 AP - 00256752 8/29/2007 LASTING IMAGES LANDSCAPE 6,003.00 AP - 00256752 8/29/2007 LASTING IMAGES LANDSCAPE -600.30 AP - 00256752 8/29/2007 LASTING IMAGES LANDSCAPE -1,083.04 AP - 00256753 8/29/2007 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 129.87 AP - 00256755 8/29/2007 LINEAR SYSTEMS 13,167.05 AP - 00256757 8/29/2007 MANSOURI, IRAJ 5,460.00 AP - 00256758 8/29/2007 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 172.79 AP - 00256758 8/29/2007 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 40.13 AP - 00256758 8/29/2007 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC G23.80 AP - 00256758 8/29/2007 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 201.56 AP - 00256759 8/29/2007 MARTIN AND CHAPMAN CO 25.40 AP - 00256760 8/29/2007 MATALON, LEE ],300.00 AP - 00256761 8/29/2007 MATTHEW BENDER AND CO. INC. 583.24 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 6 Current Date: 09/12/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 10:17:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 8/29/2007 through 9/] 1/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00256762 8/29/2007 MCCORMACK, BILLY 15.00 AP - 00256764 8/29/2007 MIGLIACCI, THERESA 135.00 AP - 00256765 8/29/2007 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR INC 515.19 AP - 00256767 8/29/2007 MYCO INVESTMENTS INC 6,130.00 AP - 00256770 8/29/2007 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 527.98 AP - 00256770 8/29/2007 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 527.98 AP - 00256771 8/29/2007 NATIONAL DEFERRED 24,511.60 AP - 00256772 8/29/2007 NESTOR TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 7,500.00 AP - 00256773 8/29/2007 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 84.00 AP - 00256774 8/29/2007 NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. 500.00 AP - 00256775 8/29/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 28.13 AP - 00256775 8/29/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 39.89 AP - 00256775 8/29/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 20.36 AP - 00256775 8/29/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 8.63 AP - 00256775 8/29/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 20.36 AP - 00256775 8/29/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 33.97 AP - 00256775 8/29/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 11.34 AP - 00256775 8/29/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 35.48 AP - 00256775 8/29/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 479.03 AP - 00256775 8/29/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 174.80 AP - 00256775 8/29/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 30.86 AP - 00256775 8/29/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 45.88 AP - 00256775 8/29/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 47.76 AP - 00256775 8/29/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 32.17 AP - 00256775 8/29/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 127.11 AP - 00256775 8/29/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 5.46 AP - 00256775 8/29/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 397.54 AP - 00256775 8/29/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 210.94 AP - 00256775 8/29/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 1,391.16 AP - 00256775 8/29/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 258.59 AP - 00256775 8/29/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 32.93 AP - 00256775 8/29/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 14.78 AP - 00256775 8/29/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 8.23 AP - 00256775 8/29/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 74.24 AP - 00256775 8/29/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 54.82 AP - 00256775 8/29/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 58.91 AP - 00256776 8/29/2007 OMNI HOTELS 988.46 AP - 00256777 8/29/2007 OMNITRANS 314.50 AP - 00256778 8/29/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 696.70 AP - 00256778 8/29/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 30.34 AP - 00256778 8/29/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 48.49 AP - 00256778 8/29/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 447.28 AP - 00256778 8/29/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 315.54 AP - 00256779 8/29/2007 ONTARIO, CITY OF 89.32 AP - 00256780 8/29/2007 OTT, LAURA 342.00 AP - 00256780 8/29/2007 OTT, LAURA 133.00 AP - 00256780 8/29/2007 OTT, LAURA 180.00 AP - 00256781 8/29/2007 OTT, SHARON 270.00 AP - 00256782 8/29/2007 PASMA 225.00 AP - 00256783 8/29/2007 PATCHLINK CORPORATION 12,303.72 AP - 00256784 8/29/2007 PATTON SALES CORP 105.00 AP - 00256784 8/29/2007 PATTON SALES CORP 105.00 AP - 00256784 8/29/2007 PATTON SALES CORP 205.29 AP - 00256784 8/29/2007 PATTON SALES CORP 105.00 P45 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 7 Current Date: 09/12/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 10:17:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P46 Agenda Check Resister 8/29/2007 through 9/11/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00256784 8/29/2007 PATTON SALES CORP 81.49 AP - 00256784 8/29/2007 PATTON SALES CORP 105.00 AP - 00286788 8/29/2007 PBM IT SOLUTIONS INC 9,531.00 AP - 00256785 8/29/2007 PBM IT SOLUTIONS INC 1,660.00 AP - 00256787 8/29/2007 PIRANHA POOL & SPA CONSTRUCTORS INC 500.00 AP - 00256788 8/29/2007 POMONA ANIMAL HOSPITAL INC -60.]0 AP - 00256788 8/29/2007 POMONA ANIMAL HOSPITAL INC -860.19 AP - 00256788 8/29/2007 POMONA ANIMAL HOSPITAL INC 2,580.82 AP - 00256788 8/29/2007 POMONA ANIMAL HOSPITAL INC 180.32 AP - 00256789 8/29/2007 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 34.20 AP - 00256790 8/29/2007 PRINCIPAL LIFE 2,082.78 AP - 00256791 8/29/2007 PSYCHIC PRDICTIONS 74.00 AP - 00256793 8/29/2007 RACEWAY FORD 24,249.27 AP - 00256793 8/29/2007 RACEWAY FORD 24,249.27 AP - 00256793 8/29/2007 RACEWAY FORD 24,249.27 AP - 00256794 8/29/2007 RANCHO PLAZA 10,000.00 AP - 00256795 8/29/2007 RANCHO SMOG CENTER 29.00 AP - 00256795 8/29/2007 RANCHO SMOG CENTER 8.12 AP - 00256795 8/29/2007 RANCHO SMOG CENTER 10.92 AP - 00256795 8/29/2007 RANCHO SMOG CENTER 8.12 AP - 00256795 8/29/2007 RANCHO SMOG CENTER 29.00 AP - 00286798 8/29/2007 RANCHO SMOG CENTER 29.00 AP - 00256795 8/29/2007 RANCHO SMOG CENTER 8.12 AP - 00256797 8/29/2007 RCPFA 7,594.73 AP - 00256798 8/29/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 200.00 AP - 00256798 8/29/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 200.00 AP - 00256798 8/29/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 131.46 AP - 00256798 8/29/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 198.26 AP - 00256798 8/29/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 200.00 AP - 00256798 8/29/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 164.86 AP - 00256798 8/29/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 200.00 AP - 00256798 8/29/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 200.00 AP - 00256798 8/29/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 147.62 AP - 00256798 8/29/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 147.62 AP - 00256798 8/29/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 163.78 AP - 00256798 8/29/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 181.02 AP - 00256798 8/29/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 162.71 AP - 00256798 8/29/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 144.39 AP - 00256798 8/29/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 113.14 AP - 00256798 8/29/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 131.46 AP - 00256798 8/29/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 172.40 AP - 00256798 8/29/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 186.41 AP - 00256799 8/29/2007 RESOURCE BUILDING MATERIALS 574.09 AP - 00256801 8/29/2007 RMA GROUP 1,597.00 AP - 00256801 8/29/2007 RMA GROUP 3,678.00 AP - 00256802 8/29/2007 ROADWAY ENGINEERING & CONTRACTING IN 29,820.00 AP - 00256802 8/29/2007 ROADWAY ENGINEERING & CONTRACTING IN -2,982.00 AP - 00256803 8/29/2007 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 92.50 AP - 00256803 8/29/2007 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 72.50 AP - 00256803 8/29/2007 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 107.50 AP - 00256804 8/29/2007 ROBLES, RAMON 48.00 AP - 00286808 8/29/2007 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 306.50 AP - 00256806 8/29/2007 S AND S HARDWARE 1,890.66 AP - 00256807 8/29/2007 SAFECO INSURANCE 2,629.83 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 8 Current Date: 09/12/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:17:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P47 Agenda Check Register 8/29/2007 through 9/11/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00256808 8/29/2007 SAMUEL FRENCH INC 2,175.00 AP - 00256809 8/29/2007 SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS 217.63 AP - 00256810 8/29/2007 SAN BERNARDINO CTY LAND USE SERVICES L ] 82.00 AP - 00256811 8/29/2007 SAN BERNARDINQ COUNTY OF 21,142.57 AP - 00256812 8/29/2007 SANTOS, MANNY 48.00 AP - 00256813 8/29/2007 SCHNEIDER, DANIEL 149.38 AP - 00256814 8/29/2007 SENECHAL, CALVIN 126.00 AP - 00256814 8/29/2007 SENECHAL, CALVIN 3.00 AP - 00256814 8/29/2007 SENECHAL, CALVIN 10.50 AP - 00256814 8/29/2007 SENECHAL, CALVIN 27.00 AP - 00256814 8/29/2007 SENECHAL, CALVIN 94.50 AP - 00256814 8/29/2007 SENECHAL, CALVIN 36.00 AP - 00256814 8/29/2007 SENECHAL, CALVIN 122.50 AP - 00256814 8/29/2007 SENECHAL, CALVIN 35.00 AP - 00256814 8/29/2007 SENECHAL, CALVIN 55.00 AP - 00256814 8/29/2007 SENECHAL, CALVIN 192.50 AP - 00256815 8/29/2007 SHEAKLEY 250.00 AP - 00256817 8/29/2007 SILVIA CONSTRUCTION INC 20,797.86 AP - 00256817 8/29/2007 SILVIA CONSTRUCTION INC - 920.00 AP - 00256818 8/29/2007 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 1,209.49 AP - 00256818 8/29/2007 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 2,556.37 AP - 00256819 8/29/2007 SKYLINE MUSIC LLC 2,900.00 AP - 00256820 8/29/2007 SLJ PRO AUDIO SERVICES SEAN JONES SS0.00 AP - 00256821 8/29/2007 SMITH CONCRETE INC 500.00 AP - 00256822 8/29/2007 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,615.98 AP - 00256823 8/29/2007 SOURCE GRAPHICS 189.99 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.32 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.15 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.01 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.52 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 437.48 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.34 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 99.80 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.79 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.97 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.34 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.34 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.77 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.67 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDTSON 15.13 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.47 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.64 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.34 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.68 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.33 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.73 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 9 Current Date: 09/12/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:17:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 8/29/2007 through 9/11/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.83 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.34 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.95 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 91.65 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.63 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.34 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.44 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 188.38 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 279.05 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.55 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 82.25 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 108.44 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.69 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.28 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.97 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.48 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 14.85 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.64 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.64 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.17 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.38 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.34 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.75 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.01 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 84.05 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.28 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.22 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.67 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.50 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 104.47 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.17 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 104.97 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 125.44 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4767 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.81 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.55 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.55 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 177.01 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 60.02 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.99 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 91.09 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 707.36 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 114.08 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 97.57 P48 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 10 Current Date: 09/12/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:17:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 8/29/2007 through 9/11/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.15 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.57 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 109.06 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.38 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 485.1 S AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.99 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 112.68 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.23 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.42 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.89 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 277.95 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.35 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.65 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 122. ] 3 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.00 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON S 1.80 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.22 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.34 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFOIWIA EDISON 15.95 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.34 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.95 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.44 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 82.60 AP - 00256827 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00256828 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90 AP - 00256828 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.82 AP - 00256828 8/29/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.55 AP - 00256829 8/29/2007 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 184.00 AP - 00256830 8/29/2007 SOUTHWEST MOBILE STORAGE INC 87.80 AP - 00256831 8/29/2007 SPINITAR 295.00 AP - 00256832 8/29/2007 SUNRISE FORD 26.51 AP - 00256832 8/29/2007 SUNRISE FORD 60.49 AP - 00256834 8/29/2007 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC 692.70 AP - 00256835 8/29/2007 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 244.55 AP - 00256836 8/29/2007 TEAM FITNESS 120.00 AP - 00256836 8/29/2007 TEAM FITNESS 140.00 AP - 00256837 8/29/2007 TENEYCK, MICHAEL 962.14 AP - 00256838 8/29/2007 TOMARK SPORTS INC 337.54 AP - 00256839 8/29/2007 TRISTAN ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS INC 26.31 AP - 00256840 8/29/2007 TUNCAY, BARBARA 2,300.00 AP - 00256841 8/29/2007 UAP DISTRIBUTION INC 566.50 AP - 00256842 8/29/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 87.34 AP - 00256842 8/29/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 818.34 AP - 00256842 8/29/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 81.73 AP - 00256842 8/29/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 28.94 AP - 00256842 8/29/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 159.28 AP - 00256842 8/29/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 28.94 AP - 00256842 8/29/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 993.91 AP - 00256842 8/29/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 163.71 AP - 00256843 8/29/2007 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 183.49 P49 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 11 Current Date: 09/12/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 10:17:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P50 Asenda Check Resister 8/29/2007 through 9/11/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00256843 8/29/2007 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 217.78 AP - 00256844 8/29/2007 UNITED TRAFFIC 956.68 AP - 00256845 8/29/2007 UNITED WAY 21.00 AP - 00256846 8/29/2007 UPLAND ANIMAL HOSPITAL 8,415.11 AP - 00256847 8/29/2007 UPS 18.49 AP - 00256847 8/29/2007 UPS 35.77 AP - 00256848 8/29/2007 VASQUEZ, LESLIE 96.00 AP - 00256848 8/29/2007 VASQUEZ, LESLIE 84.00 AP - 00256849 8/29/2007 VASTA, WILLIAM 188.56 AP - 00256851 8/29/2007 VERIZON 87.48 AP - 00256851 8/29/2007 VERIZON 19.21 AP - 00256851 8/29/2007 VERIZON 32.99 AP - 00256851 8/29/2007 VERIZON 32.11 AP - 00256851 8/29/2007 VERIZON 31.98 AP - 00256851 8/29/2007 VERIZON 89.50 AP - 00256851 8/29/2007 VERIZON 19.21 AP - 00256851 8/29/2007 VERIZON 31.98 AP - 00256851 8/29/2007 VERIZON 639.87 AP - 00256851 8/29/2007 VERIZON 19.21 AP - 00256851 8/29/2007 VERIZON 33.08 AP - 00256851 8/29/2007 VERIZON 19.25 AP - 00256851 8/29/2007 VERIZON 19.21 AP - 00256851 8/29/2007 VERIZON 19.21 AP - 00256851 8/29/2007 VERIZON 32.99 AP - 00256851 8/29/2007 VERIZON 19.21 AP - 00256851 8/29/2007 VERIZON 158.56 AP - 00256851 8/29/2007 VERIZON 19.36 AP - 00256851 8/29/2007 VERIZON 42.39 AP - 00256851 8/29/2007 VERIZON 204.36 AP - 00256852 8/29/2007 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 175.00 AP - 00256853 8/29/2007 VILLAGE NURSERIES WHOLESALE LLC 576.73 AP - 00256854 8/29/2007 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 454.23 AP - 00256854 8/29/2007 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 451.82 AP - 00256854 8/29/2007 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 1,703.01 AP - 00256854 8/29/2007 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 1,265.68 AP - 00256854 8/29/2007 WLCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 453.03 AP - 00256854 8/29/2007 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 63.58 AP - 00256855 8/29/2007 WALKER, ANDREW 100.00 AP - 00256856 8/29/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 674.30 AP - 00256856 8/29/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 4.13 AP - 00256856 8/29/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 243.90 AP - 00256856 8/29/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 542.98 AP - 00256857 8/29/2007 WEST COAST TURF 116.91 AP - 00256858 8/29/2007 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 206.19 AP - 00256859 8/29/2007 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 122.92 AP - 00256860 8/29/2007 WESTERN CITY MAGAZINE 63.00 AP - 00256861 8/29/2007 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS INC 994.33 AP - 00256861 8/29/2007 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS INC -543.11 AP - 00256862 8/29/2007 WESTERN MEDICAL SUPPLY INC 95.03 AP - 00256863 8/29/2007 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 6,198.37 AP - 00256863 8/29/2007 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 6,198.37 AP - 00256863 8/29/2007 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 6,198.36 AP - 00256863 8/29/2007 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 34,972.50 AP - 00256864 8/29/2007 YEE, LARRY 66.00 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 12 Current Date: 09/12/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:17:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P51 AEenda Check ReEister 8/29/2007 through 9/11/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00256865 8/29/2007 ZEE MEDICAL INC 101.16 AP - 00256865 8/29/2007 ZEE MEDICAL INC 784.29 AP - 00256866 8/29/2007 ZIRGES, ARLENE 150.00 AP - 00256866 8/29/2007 ZIRGES, ARLENE 150.00 AP - 00256866 8/29/2007 ZIRGES, ARLENE 189.00 AP - 00256867 8/30/2007 COFFMAN, MICHAEL 95.00 AP - 00256868 9/5/2007 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 196.91 AP - 00256868 9/5/2007 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 93.45 AP - 00256868 9/5/2007 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 145.46 AP - 00256868 9/5/2007 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 52.59 AP - 00256869 9/5/2007 ABC LOCKSMITHS 117.50 AP - 00256870 9/5/2007 ABLAC 207.48 AP - 00256871 9/5/2007 ABLETRONICS 136.51 AP - 00256871 9/5/2007 ABLETRONICS 20.01 AP - 00256872 9/5/2007 ACCOUNTEMPS 955.50 AP - 00256872 9/5/2007 ACCOUNTEMPS 245.00 AP - 00256873 9/5/2007 ADEA, LIMA 500.00 AP - 00256874 9/5/2007 ADOFO, GINA ARHIN 250.00 AP - 00256875 9/5/2007 AGUIRRE, PARIS 320.00 AP - 00256876 9/5/2007 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 14,555.35 AP - 00256876 9/5/2007 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. ] 4,086.49 AP - 00256876 9/5/2007 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 14,086.49 AP - 00256877 9/5/2007 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO 51.00 AP - 00256878 9/5/2007 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00256878 9/5/2007 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00256878 9/5/2007 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00256878 9/5/2007 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00256878 9/5/2007 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00256878 9/5/2007 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00256878 9/5/2007 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00256878 9/5/2007 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00256878 9/5/2007 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00256878 9/5/2007 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00256878 9/5/2007 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00256878 9/5/2007 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00256879 9/5/2007 ALVAREZ, MARIA 1,000.00 AP - 00256880 9/5/2007 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INC. 188.88 AP - 00256880 9/5/2007 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INC. 641.68 AP - 00256880 9/5/2007 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INC. 84.69 AP - 00256880 9/5/2007 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INC. 84.69 AP - 00256881 9/5/2007 AMERICAN SOCCER COMPANY INC 534.40 AP - 00256882 9/5/2007 APA INC. 15,750.00 AP - 00256883 9/5/2007 APPLIED METERING TECHNOLOGIES INC 8,535.83 AP - 00256884 9/5/2007 ARCH WIRELESS 7477 AP - 00256885 9/5/2007 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 600.00 AP - 00256886 9/5/2007 ARGENT, JOHN 100.00 AP - 00256887 9/5/2007 ARVISQ JEANEAN 40.00 AP - 00256888 9/5/2007 AT AND T 152.43 AP - 00256889 9/5/2007 AT&T 1,344.23 AP - 00256889 9/5/2007 AT&T 18.29 AP - 00256889 9/5/2007 AT&T 3,082.31 AP - 00256889 9/5/2007 ATRT 109.90 AP - 00256890 9/5/2007 AUNARIO, ROSE MARIE 250.00 AP - 00256891 9/5/2007 AUTO SPECIALISTS 2,472.50 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 13 Current Date: 09/12/200 Report: CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:17:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P52 Agenda Check Register 8/29/2007 through 9/1(/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00256892 9/5!2007 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 168.14 AP - 00256892 9/5/2007 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 10.60 AP - 00256892 9/5/2007 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 108.87 AP - 00256892 9/5/2007 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 41.03 AP - 00256892 9/5/2007 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 261.48 AP - 00256892 9/5/2007 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 110.24 AP - 00256892 9/5/2007 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 69.60 AP - 00256892 9/5/2007 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 480.44 AP - 00256892 9/5/2007 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 145.46 AP - 00256894 9/5/2007 BADGE A MINIT 110.05 AP - 00256895 9/5/2007 BADIOLA, ROCIO 210.00 AP - 00256896 9/5/2007 BALDY FIRE AND SAFETY 468.89 AP - 00256896 9/5/2007 BALDY FIRE AND SAFETY 1,280.00 AP - 00256897 9/5/2007 BALNEG, RAFAEL 18.00 AP - 00256898 9/5/2007 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 1,874.85 AP - 00256898 9/5/2007 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 393.54 AP - 00256899 9/5/2007 BANK OF AMERICA 700.00 AP - 00256900 9/5/2007 BARNES AND NOBLE 79.17 AP - 00256900 9/5/2007 BARNES AND NOBLE 241.19 AP - 00256900 9/5/2007 BARNES AND NOBLE 87.67 AP - 00256901 9/5/2007 BATES, JANIS 3.00 AP - 00256902 9/5/2007 BCT ENTERTAINMENT 86.20 AP - 00256903 9/5/2007 BHIBEKSHAN, SAROJ 105.00 AP - 00256904 9/5/2007 BLENNER, JANET 200.00 AP - 00256905 9/5/2007 BLEVINS, SARAH 200.00 AP - 00256906 9/5/2007 BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA 150,590.86 AP - 00256907 9/5/2007 BOGACZYK, SELINA 39.00 AP - 00256908 9/5/2007 BONGARDE HOLDINGS INC. 147.00 AP - 00256909 9/5/2007 BRODART BOOKS 2,249.82 AP - 00256909 9/5/2007 BRODART BOOKS 17,998.56 AP - 00256909 9/5/2007 BRODART BOOKS 914.53 AP - 00256909 9/5/2007 BRODART BOOKS 22789 AP - 00256910 9/5/2007 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 17.50 AP - 00256912 9/5/2007 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 318.57 AP - 00256913 9/5/2007 CALIFORNIA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 140.00 AP - 002569]4 9/5/2007 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 372.03 AP - 00256915 9/5/2007 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 223.09 AP - 00256916 9/5/2007 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 25.00 AP - 00256917 9/5/2007 CALLAHAN, MICHAEL 40.00 AP - 00256918 9/5/2007 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY 29.99 AP - 00256919 9/5/2007 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY 29.78 AP - 00256920 9/5/2007 CAMPBELL, EMILY 172.38 AP - 00256921 9/5/2007 CARTER, DESI 40.00 AP - 00256922 9/5/2007 CENTER, THE 1,762.00 AP - 00256923 9/5/2007 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT 24,535.80 AP - 00256924 9/5/2007 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT 627.25 AP - 00256925 9/5/2007 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 500.00 AP - 00256927 9/5/2007 CHOCK, JOHANNA 80.00 AP - 00256928 9/5/2007 CLARK, KAREN 360.00 AP - 00256929 9/5/2007 CLOUD, DON 320.00 AP - 00256930 9/5/2007 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 3,000.00 AP - 00256931 9/5/2007 CONTRERAS, CANDELARIA 76.50 AP - 00256932 9/5/2007 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 38.75 AP - 00256932 9/5/2007 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 38.75 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 14 Current Date: 09/12/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:17:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P53 A¢enda Check Register 8/29/2007 through 9/11/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00256933 9/S/2007 COUSIN, DAVID 275.00 AP - 00256933 9/S/2007 COUSIN, DAVID 275.00 AP - 00256934 9/5/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 215.89 AP - 00256934 9/S/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 249.32 AP - 00256934 9/S/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 278.58 AP - 00256934 9/S/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 266.61 AP - 00256934 9/5/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 266.61 AP - 00256934 9/S/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,603.26 AP - 00256934 9/S/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 118.80 AP - 00256934 9/S/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 268.44 AP - 00256934 9/5/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 72.25 AP - 00256934 9/5/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 326.03 AP - 002S693S 9/S/2007 CUSHMAN, KIM 40.00 AP - 00256936 9/S/2007 D.B. ELECTRICAL 45.00 AP - 00256937 9/S/2007 DAMS, LORI 250.00 AP - 00256938 9/5/2007 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 704.00 AP - 00256938 9/S/2007 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 2,643.00 AP - 00256939 9/S/2007 DESIGN PARTNERS INC. 629.00 AP - 00256939 9/5/2007 DESIGN PARTNERS INC. 629.00 AP - 00256940 9/S/2007 DIRECTV 29.99 AP - 00256941 9/S/2007 DOUBLETREE HOTEL 116.71 AP - 00256943 9/S/2007 EDFUND 65.08 AP - 00256944 9/S/2007 EGANS, KENNETH 250.00 AP - 00256945 9/S/2007 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 309.35 AP - 002S694S 9/5/2007 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 70.04 AP - 00256945 9/S/2007 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 36.64 AP - 00256946 9/S/2007 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS 2,741.16 AP - 00256947 9/S/2007 ENGELKE, LINDA 1,047.00 AP - 00256948 9/5/2007 ENVISIONWARE INC. 2,660.50 AP - 00256949 9/5/2007 ESCOBAR, KARLA 250.00 AP - 00256949 9/S/2007 ESCOBAR, KARLA 208.32 AP - 00256950 9/S/2007 ESPINO, ALICIA 49.54 AP - 00256950 9/S/2007 ESPINO, ALICIA 172.38 AP - 002S69S1 9/S/2007 ESTANDIA, MELANIE 250.00 AP - 00256952 9/S/2007 ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT 385.00 AP - 002S69S3 9/5/2007 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 99.52 AP - 00256953 9/S/2007 'EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 100.58 AP - 00256953 9/5/2007 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 196.32 AP - 00256953 9/S/2007 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 260.60 AP - 00256953 9/S/2007 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 711.59 AP - 00256954 9/S/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 17.78 AP - 00256954 9/S/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 15.91 AP - 00256954 9/S/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 77.77 AP - 002S69S4 9/5/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 21.43 AP - 00256954 9/5/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 23.30 AP - 00256954 9/5/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 17.78 AP - 002S695S 9/S/2007 FELICIANO, ANTHONY 240.00 AP - 00256956 9/5/2007 FILARSKY AND WATT 1,500.00 AP - 00256957 9/S/2007 FILIPPI, HILDA 40.00 AP - 002S69S8 9/S/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,444.00 AP - 002S69S8 9/S/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 640.00 AP - 00256958 9/S/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 664.00 AP - 002S69S8 9/S/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 680.00 AP - 002S69S9 9/5/2007 FOUNTAIN OF TRUTH APOSTOLIC CHURCH 350.00 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 1S Current Date: 09/12/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 10:17:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P54 Asenda Check Resister 8/29/2007 through 9/11/2007 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP - 00256961 9/5/2007 FURGERSON, GERRY 70.00 AP - 00256962 9/5/2007 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 9,100.00 AP - 00256963 9/5/2007 GARCIA, VIVIAN 33.95 AP - 00256964 9/5/2007 GEOGRAPHICS 2,889.79 AP - 00256964 9/5/2007 GEOGRAPHICS 655.00 AP - 00256964 9/5/2007 GEOGRAPHICS 2963 AP - 00256964 9/5/2007 GEOGRAPHICS 640.00 AP - 00256965 9/5/2007 GIBANI, MOHAMED 8.00 AP - 00256966 9/5/2007 GILL, AMY 40.00 AP - 00256967 9/5/2007 GOLF VENTURES WEST 32.33 AP - 00256967 9/5/2007 GOLF VENTURES WEST 32.33 AP - 00256967 9/5/2007 GOLF VENTURES WEST 77.54 AP - 00256968 9/5/2007 GONZALEZ, MARGARET 40.00 AP - 00256969 9/5/2007 GRAINGER 39.59 AP - 00256969 9/5/2007 GRAINGER 308.69 AP - 00256969 9/5/2007 GRAINGER 744.16 AP - 00256969 9/5/2007 GRAINGER 11.70 AP - 00256969 9/5/2007 GRAINGER -60.97 AP - 00256969 9/5/2007 GRAINGER -487.81 AP - 00256969 9/5/2007 GRAINGER 229.90 AP - 00256969 9/5/2007 GRAINGER 1,015.07 AP - 00256969 9/5/2007 GRAINGER 358.58 AP - 00256969 9/5/2007 GRAINGER 295.84 AP - 00256969 9/S/2007 GRAINGER 808.13 AP - 00256969 9/5/2007 GRAINGER 447.70 AP - 00256969 9/5/2007 GRAINGER 210.54 AP - 00256969 9/5/2007 GRAINGER 207.42 AP - 00256969 9/5/2007 GRAINGER 24.83 AP - 00256969 9/5/2007 GRAINGER 121.95 AP - 00256969 9/5/2007 GRAINGER 487.81 AP - 00256969 9/5/2007 GRAINGER 90.35 AP - 00256969 9/5/2007 GRAINGER 113.14 AP - 00256969 9/5/2007 GRAINGER 11.27 AP - 00256969 9/5/2007 GRAINGER 156.02 AP - 00256969 9/5/2007 GRAINGER 132.70 AP - 00256969 9/5/2007 GRAINGER 288.82 AP - 00256969 9/5/2007 GRAINGER 138.62 AP - 00256969 9/5/2007 GRAINGER 129.13 AP - 00256969 9/5/2007 GRAINGER 189.30 AP - 00256969 9/5/2007 GRAINGER 8223 AP - 00256970 9/5/2007 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 244.54 AP - 00256971 9/5/2007 GRESSCO LTD 1,715.00 AP - 00256971 9/S/2007 GRESSCO LTD 111.28 AP - 00256972 9/5/2007 GRIGOLLA AND SONS CONST INC 48.40 AP - 00256973 9/5/2007 GUARDIAN 3,391.02 AP - 00256974 9/5/2007 GUTIERREZ, KERRE 30.00 AP - 00256975 9/5/2007 GWINCO CONSTRUCTION AND ENGINEERING 65.00 AP - 00256976 9/5/2007 HAR-BRO INC. 3,309.33 AP - 00256977 9/5/2007 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO 47.07 AP - 00256978 9/5/2007 HEARTSAVERS LLC 100.00 AP - 00256978 9/5/2007 HEARTSAVERS LLC 180.00 AP - 00256979 9/5/2007 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 593.96 AP - 00256980 9/5/2007 HIRSCH AND ASSOCIATES 23.14 AP - 00256981 9/5/2007 HLP INC. 10,760.00 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 16 Current Date: 09/12/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:17:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A>?enda Check ReEister 8/29/2007 through 9/11/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00256982 9/5/2007 HOLLOSY, TISHA 60.00 AP - 00256984 9/5/2007 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VAL] 50.00 AP - 00256984 9/5/2007 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN IIERNARDINO VAL] 25.00 AP - 00256984 9/5/2007 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VAL] 50.00 AP - 00256984 9/5/2007 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VAL] 25.00 AP - 00256984 9/5/2007 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALI 25.00 AP - 00256984 9/5/2007 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VAL] 25.00 AP - 00256984 9/5/2007 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VAL] 50.00 AP - 00256984 9/5/2007 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALI 50.00 AP - 00256984 9/5/2007 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VAL] 25.00 AP - 00256985 9/5/2007 HURTADO, LILIANA 4.00 AP - 00256986 9/S/2007 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 173.18 AP - 00256986 9/5/2007 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 86.39 AP - 00256987 9/5/2007 IMPRESSIONS GOURMET CATERING 5,156.32 AP - 00256988 9/5/2007 INLAND DESERT SECURITY & COMMUNICATK 564.70 AP - 00256989 9/5/2007 INLAND EMPIRE MAGAZINE 1,095.00 AP - 00256990 9/5/2007 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIC 1,424.00 AP - 00256991 9/5/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 275.00 AP - 00256991 9/5/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 482.50 AP - 00256991 9/5/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 240.00 AP - 00256991 9/5/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 282.50 AP - 00256991 9/5/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 120.75 AP - 00256991 9/5/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 350.00 AP - 00256991 9/5/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 117.50 AP - 00256991 9/5/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 117.50 AP - 00256991 9/5/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 140.00 AP - 00256991 9/5/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 355.00 AP - 00256991 9/5/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 740.00 AP - 00256992 9/5/2007 INLAND VALLEY RV SERVICE & SUPPLIES 307.31 AP - 00256993 9/5/2007 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 887.49 AP - 00256994 9/5/2007 J D C INC 9,866.00 AP - 00256995 9/5/2007 JAN WAY COMPANY INC 240.80 AP - 00256995 9/5/2007 JAN WAY COMPANY INC 24.87 AP - 00256996 9/5/2007 JERDSKULBOON, AUNEE 16.00 AP - 00256997 9/5/2007 JOHN, RUTH 50.00 AP - 00256998 9/5/2007 JONES, CHRISTINA HAATAINEN 662.00 AP - 00256999 9/5/2007 JONES, GLENDA 40.00 AP - 00256999 9/5/2007 JONES, GLENDA 100.00 AP - 00257000 9/5/2007 JUST BARGAINS FOOD STORE 20.00 AP - 00257001 9/5/2007 JW MEDIA 10.00 AP - 00257002 9/5/2007 KAPCO 180.16 AP - 00257003 9/5/2007 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC 337.05 AP - 00257003 9/5/2007 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC 431.87 AP - 00257003 9/5/2007 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC 438.59 AP - 00257003 9/5/2007 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC I6S.34 AP - 00257003 9/5/2007 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC 165.34 AP - 00257004 9/5/2007 KELLER WILLIAMS REALTY RANCHO MARKET 286.54 AP - 00257004 9/5/2007 KELLER WILLIAMS REALTY RANCHO MARKET 300.75 AP - 00257005 9/5/2007 KING, CHRISTOPHER 500.00 AP - 00257006 9/5/2007 KING, JESSICA 20.28 AP - 00257007 9/5/2007 KNOWLTON, TIFFANY 35.00 AP - 00257008 9/5/2007 KRAMERS MASONRY 42.50 AP - 00257008 9/5/2007 KRAMERS MASONRY 183.00 AP - 00257009 9/5/2007 KREBS, ANGELA 20.00 P55 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 17 Current Date: 09/12/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 10:17:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P56 Agenda Check Register 8/29/2007 through 9/11/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00257010 9/5/2007 ORR, KURSTEN ] 12. 00 AP - 00257011 9/5/2007 L S A ASSOCIATES INC 8,839. 83 AP - 00257013 9/5/2007 LAZER VAUDEVILLE INC 8,800. 00 AP - 002570]4 9/5/2007 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 702. 00 AP - 00257014 9/5/2007 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 432. 00 AP - 00257014 9/5/2007 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 242. 00 AP - 00257014 9/5/2007 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 1,658. 95 AP - 00257015 9/5/2007 LILIA CLEANING 12. 15 AP - 00257016 9/5/2007 LIM, CLAUDIA 100. 00 AP - 00257017 9/5/2007 LINDSEY ARTIST SERVICES, GARY 2,000. 00 AP - 00257018 9/5/2007 LITTLE PRODUCTIONS INC, RICH 22,500. 00 AP - 00257020 9/5/2007 LOPEZ, JOSE 629. 00 AP - 00257021 9/5/2007 LOPEZ, WENDY 91. 00 AP - 00257022 9/5/2007 LOS ANGELES NEWSPAPER GROUP 215. 00 AP - 00257023 9/5/2007 LOS ANGELES TIMES 42. 40 AP - 00257025 9/5/2007 MANELA, ROSARIO 21. 46 AP - 00257025 9/5/2007 MANELA, ROSARIO 27. 45 AP - 00257025 9/5/2007 MANELA, ROSARIO 15. 00 AP - 00257026 9/5/2007 MANNING, KEN 500. 00 AP - 00257027 9/5/2007 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 908. 36 AP - 00257028 9/5/2007 MARSHALL AND MCKNIGHT TOWING INC 75. 00 AP - 00257029 9/5/2007 MCCARTHY, DEANNA 62. 00 AP - 00257030 9/5/2007 MCGUIGAN, REBECA 15. 00 AP - 00257031 9/5/2007 MCI 621. 75 AP - 00257033 9/5/2007 MCVAY, IDA 14 .00 AP - 00257034 9/5/2007 METROPOLITAN COOPERATIVE LIBRARY 200 .00 AP - 00257035 9/5/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 467 .80 AP - 00257035 9/5/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 98 .95 AP - 00257035 9/5/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 47 .98 AP - 00257035 9/5/2007 MIDWEST TAPE -24 .99 AP - 00257035 9/5/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 22 99 AP - 00257035 9/5/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 254 .87 AP - 00257035 9/5/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 200 .88 AP - 00257035 9/5/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 178 .89 AP - 00257035 9/5/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 225 .90 AP - 00257035 9/5/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 237 .90 AP - 00257035 9/5/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 34 .98 AP - 00257035 9/5/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 180 .92 AP - 00257035 9/5/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 265 .88 AP - 00257035 9/5/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 511 .83 AP - 00257035 9/5/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 80 .97 AP - 00257035 9/5/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 80 .97 AP - 00257036 9/5/2007 MIRZA, SHGUFTA 148 .00 AP - 00257037 9/5/2007 MOORE, MITZI 70 .00 AP - 00257038 9/5/2007 MOREL, MELISSA 36 .00 AP - 00257039 9/5/2007 MOUNTAINSIDE MASTER CHORALE 1,000 .00 AP - 00257040 9/5/2007 MT SAC TELEVISION PRODUCTION 150 .00 AP - 00257041 9/5/2007 MURKINS, MARTHA 500 .00 AP - 00257042 9/5/2007 NAES, CHEREE 33 .00 AP - 00257044 9/5/2007 NAPITUPULU, JOHNNY 500 .00 AP - 00257045 9/5/2007 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 527 .98 AP - 00257046 9/5/2007 NATIONAL DATA & SURVEYING SERVICES 42 .00 AP - 00257046 9/5/2007 NATIONAL DATA & SURVEYING SERVICES 1,008 .00 AP - 00257047 9/5/2007 NATIONAL DEFERRED 32,870 .89 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 18 Current Date: 09/12/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:17:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 8/29/2007 through 9/11/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00257048 9/5/2007 NATIONAL PEN CORPORATION 111. 86 AP - 00257048 9/5/2007 NATIONAL PEN CORPORATION 55. 78 AP - 00257049 9/5/2007 NATO, JULIET 40. 00 AP - 00257050 9/5/2007 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC 3,034. 34 AP - 00257051 9/5/2007 NESTOR TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 7,500. 00 AP - 00257052 9/5/2007 NET COM TECHNOLOGIES INC 114. 33 AP - 00257053 9/5/2007 NEW IMAGE COMMERCIAL FLOORING 16,036. 11 AP - 00257054 9/5/2007 NEWMAN, SHA 1,316. 00 AP - 00257055 9/5/2007 NIGHTINGALE CONANT 12. 00 AP - 00257055 9/5/2007 NIGHTINGALE CONANT 3. 00 AP - 00257056 9/5/2007 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 120. 00 AP - 00257057 9/5/2007 NOLO PRESS 55. 98 AP - 00257058 9/5/2007 NORMAN, DARRYL 14. 00 AP - 00257059 9/5/2007 OCLC INC 45. 83 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 42. 83 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 68. 15 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 12. 99 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 215. 49 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 2,592. 90 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 29. 07 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 135. 29 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 13. 76 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 9. 47 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 43. 09 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 114. 25 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 135. 29 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT -22 89 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 28. 88 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 25. 08 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 7. 39 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 56. 46 AP - 0025706] 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 8. 06 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 161. 38 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 55. 58 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 88. 87 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 221. 75 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 57. 04 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 470. 76 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 450 .22 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 662 .3 ] AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 538 .53 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 125 .88 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 65 .35 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 9 .30 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 16 .57 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT -135 .29 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 30 .49 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 135 .29 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 71 .32 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 135 .29 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT -135 .29 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 121 .22 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT -80 .21 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 139 .86 P57 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 19 Current Date: 09/12/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 10:17:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P58 Aeenda Check Register 8/29/2007 through 9/11/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00257061 9/8/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 111.56 AP - 00257061 9/8/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 652.07 AP - 00257061 9/8/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 2423 AP - 00257061 9/8/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 43.15 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 170.77 AP - 00257061 9/8/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 23.49 AP - 00257061 9/8/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 200.31 AP - 00257061 9/8/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 28.88 AP - 00257061 9/8/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 80.75 AP - 00257061 9/5/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 24.98 AP - 00257061 9/8/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 13.96 AP - 00257061 9/8/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 1 SO.S7 AP - 00257061 9/8/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 86.38 AP - 00257062 9/8/2007 OLIVAS, GLORIA ANN 15.00 AP - 00257063 9/8/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 386.47 AP - 00257063 9/8/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 116.89 AP - 00257063 9/8/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 357.76 AP - 00257063 9/8/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 1,113.66 AP - 00257063 9/8/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 2,188.47 AP - 00257063 9/8/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 147.90 AP - 00257063 9/8/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 815.09 AP - 00257063 9/8/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 920.71 AP - 00257063 9/8/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 208.84 AP - 00257063 9/8/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 213.35 AP - 00257063 9/8/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 42.50 AP - 00257064 9/8/2007 OTUBUAH, ERIC 22825 AP - 00287068 9/8/2007 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 8.19 AP - 00287068 9/8/2007 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 32.07 AP - 00287068 9/8/2007 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 47.19 AP - 00257066 9/8/2007 PAPA 130.00 AP - 00257067 9/8/2007 PABON, VANESSA 425.00 AP - 00257067 9/5/2007 PABON, VANESSA 30.00 AP - 00257068 9/8/2007 PAIRMAN, DORIS IS0.00 AP - 00257069 9/8/2007 PAL CAMPAIGN 92.00 AP - 00257070 9/8/2007 PALM SPRINGS FOLLIES 260.00 AP - 00257071 9/8/2007 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 127.50 AP - 00257071 9/8/2007 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 129.30 AP - 00257071 9/8/2007 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 85.00 AP - 00257071 9/8/2007 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 127.50 AP - 00257072 9/8/2007 PERVO PAINT CO 3,165.97 AP - 00257073 9/5/2007 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 205.91 AP - 00257073 9/8/2007 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 464.32 AP - 00257073 9/8/2007 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 33.00 AP - 00257074 9/8/2007 PHAN, MEI 24.00 AP - 00287078 9/8/2007 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS 391.12 AP - 00257076 9/8/2007 PHONG, BRYAN 250.00 AP - 00257076 9/8/2007 PHONG, BRYAN 150.00 AP - 00257077 9/8/2007 PIONEER MANUFACTURING 288.84 AP - 00257078 9/8/2007 PITASSI ARCHITECTS INC 91.75 AP - 00257079 9/5/2007 PITNEY BOWES 206.88 AP - 00257080 9/8/2007 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 277.89 AP - 00257081 9/8/2007 PROLITERACY AMERICA 99.00 AP - 00257082 9/8/2007 QUEMADO, MEREDITH 70.00 AP - 00257083 9/8/2007 QWEST 3.75 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 20 Current Date: 09/12/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 10:]7:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P59 Agenda Check Register 8/29/2007 through 9/] 1/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00257084 9/S/2007 RACEWAY FORD 21,SS2. 91 AP - 00257085 9/S/2007 RAMIREZ, GABRIELLA 46. 00 AP - 00257086 9/5/2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GARDEN INN 1,920. 00 AP - 00257087 9/5/2007 RANDOM HOUSE INC 94. 82 AP - 00257087 9/5/2007 RANDOM HOUSE INC 343. 30 AP - 00257087 9/S/2007 RANDOM HOUSE INC 6. 47 AP - 00257087 9/5/2007 RANDOM HOUSE INC 163. 46 AP - 00257087 9/5/2007 RANDOM HOUSE INC 81. 73 AP - 00257088 9/5/2007 RASMUSSEN, MILT 400. 00 AP - 00257089 9/5/2007 RATLIFF, TERRY C 450. 00 AP - 0025709 ] 9/S/2007 RAYMOND, EMILY 50. 00 AP - 00257093 9/S/2007 RECORDED BOOKS LLC 17. 14 AP - 00257093 9/S/2007 RECORDED BOOKS LLC 7. 49 AP - 00257093 9/5/2007 RECORDED BOOKS LLC 231. 03 AP - 00257094 9/5/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 200. 00 AP - 00257094 9/S/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 189. 06 AP - 00257094 9/5/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 200. 00 AP - 00257094 9/5/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 177. 69 AP - 00257095 9/5/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 198. 79 AP - 00257096 9/5/2007 REYSAL, RINEN 250. 00 AP - 00257097 9/5/2007 RINCON, CHRISTINE LEA 121. 00 AP - 00257099 9/S/2007 ROBENSON, LISSA 250. 00 AP - 00257100 9/5/2007 ROBLES, RAMON 48. 00 AP - 00257101 9/5/2007 RODRIGUEZ, ROLAND 400. 00 AP - 00257101 9/5/2007 RODRIGUEZ, ROLAND 70. 00 AP - 00257102 9/5/2007 ROMAN, ROSEMARY 500. 00 AP - 00257103 9/S/2007 ROOZE, NDY 91. 00 AP - 00257104 9/S/2007 ROSAS, RICK 110. 00 AP - 002S710S 9/S/2007 SAID, FADIA 8. 00 AP - 00257106 9/S/2007 SAMPLES, KRISTY 56. 26 AP - 00257107 9/5/2007 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( 373. 50 AP - 00257107 9/S/2007 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( 498. 00 AP - 00257107 9/5/2007 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( 373. 50 AP - 00257108 9/5/2007 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 176. 00 AP - 00257109 9/S/2007 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 646. 08 AP - 00257] 10 9/5/2007 SANDOVAL, FROYLAN 32. 00 AP - 00257110 ~ 9/5/2007 SANDOVAL, FROYLAN 100. 00 AP - 00257111 9/5/2007 SANTOS, MANNY 96. 00 AP - 00257112 9/5/2007 SCAN NATOA INC 75. 00 AP - 00257113 9/S/2007 SCOTT, DIANA 375. 00 AP - 002S711S 9/5/2007 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 250. 00 AP - 00257117 9/5/2007 SHIELDS, ANA 100. 00 AP - 00257118 9/5/2007 SHOETERIA 200 .00 AP - 002571 ]9 9/5/2007 SHRED IT 42 .50 AP - 00257119 9/S/2007 SHRED IT 21 .25 AP - 00257119 9/S/2007 SHRED IT 21 .25 AP - 00257119 9/5/2007 SHRED IT 39 .50 AP - 00257121 9/5/2007 SMALLEY, PATTIE 40 .00 AP - 00257123 9/5/2007 SMITH, MICHAEL C 733 .00 AP - 00257124 9/S/2007 SMITH, MICHAEL C 733 .00 AP - 00257130 9/S/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,611 .19 AP - 00257130 9/S/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40 .24 AP - 00257131 9/S/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RISK MANAGEMENT . 8,746 .25 AP - 00257132 9/S/2007 SPADONI, XUAN 72 .00 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 21 Current Date : 09/12/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG _PORTRAIT _RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 10:17:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P60 Aeenda Check Register 8/29/2007 through 9/11/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00257133 9/S/2007 SPARKLETTS 71.98 AP - 00257133 9/S/2007 SPARKLETTS 217.78 AP - 00257134 9/S/2007 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 537.43 AP - 002S713S 9/S/2007 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 179.00 AP - 00257136 9/S/2007 STEELE, KAREN 20.00 AP - 00257137 9/S/2007 STOFA, JOSEPH 13.00 AP - 00257138 9/S/2007 STORMS, CHRISTY 250.00 AP - 00257139 9/S/2007 STUART DEAN INC 4,896.00 AP - 00257141 9/5/2007 SUCHOZA, YOLANDA 24.00 AP - 00257143 9/S/2007 SWEEEDE, YOKO 40.00 AP - 00257144 9/S/2007 T MOBILE 221.14 AP - 002S714S 9/S/2007 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 175.00 AP - 002S714S 9/S/2007 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 1,852.80 AP - 00257146 9/S/2007 THEATRICAL LIGHTING & SCENIC SERVICE 320.68 AP - 00257147 9/5/2007 THOMPSON, SANDRA 500.00 AP - 00257148 9/S/2007 THOMSON GALE 54.10 AP - 00257148 9/S/2007 THOMSON GALE 71.80 AP - 00257148 9/S/2007 THOMSON GALE 151.68 AP - 00257148 9/S/2007 THOMSON GALE 54.08 AP - 00257148 9/S/2007 THOMSON GALE ] S 1.69 AP - 00257148 9/S/2007 THOMSON GALE 27.44 AP - 00257148 9/S/2007 THOMSON GALE 29.27 AP - 00257148 9/S/2007 THOMSON GALE 29.27 AP - 00257148 9/S/2007 THOMSON GALE 29.27 AP - 00257148 9/5/2007 THOMSON GALE 28.40 AP - 00257148 9/S/2007 THOMSON GALE 2927 AP - 00257148 9/S/2007 THOMSON GALE 29.27 AP - 00257148 9/S/2007 THOMSON GALE S8.S4 AP - 00257148 9/S/2007 THOMSON GALE 2664 AP - 00257149 9/S/2007 TIME WARNER TELECOM 2,463.08 AP - 002S71S0 9/S/2007 TOBIN, RENEE 13.19 AP - 002S71S0 9/S/2007 TOBIN, RENEE 8.07 AP - 002S71S1 9/5/2007 TOMAJIAN, AUDREY 99.00 AP - 00257152 9/S/2007 TRADER JOE'S 1,038.77 AP - 002S71S3 9/S/2007 TRIEU, LINH 40.00 AP - 002S71S4 9/S/2007 TRIVEDI, JAY 28.00 AP - 002S71S5 9/S/2007 TROTTER, JANIS 40.00 AP - 002S71S6 9/S/2007 TRUSFRAME INC 47.50 AP - 002S71S7 9/S/2007 TUCKERMAN, BARB 32.04 AP - 002S71S8 9/S/2007 UAP DISTRIBUTION INC 2,982.95 AP - 00257160 9/S/2007 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC SS4.00 AP - 00257162 9/S/2007 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P. 2,440.85 AP - 00257163 9/S/2007 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 3,751.78 AP - 00257163 9/S/2007 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 43,143.74 AP - 00257164 9/S/2007 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 478.54 AP - 002S716S 9/S/2007 UNITED SCENIC ARTISTS PENSION & WELFARI 320.96 AP - 00257166 9/S/2007 UNITED SCENIC ARTISTS PENSION & WELFARI 320.96 AP - 00257167 9/S/2007 UNITED SCENIC ARTISTS PENSION & WELFARI 374.00 AP - 00257168 9/5/2007 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 132.71 AP - 00257170 9/S/2007 UNITED WAY 329.82 AP - 00257171 9/S/2007 VALLADERAS, AILEEN 80.00 AP - 00257173 9/S/2007 VALUE LINE PUBLISHING INC 269.00 AP - 00257173 9/S/2007 VALUE LINE PUBLISHING INC 2SS.SS AP - 002S717S 9/S/2007 VENTURA, STACY 20.00 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 22 Current Date: 09/12/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:17:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 8/29/2007 through 9/11/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00257176 9/5/2007 VERA, CARA 45.83 AP - 00257177 9/5/2007 VERGARA, ROSARIO 50.00 AP - 00257179 9/5/2007 VERIZON 46].78 AP - 00257179 9/5/2007 VERIZON 89.75 AP - 00257179 9/5/2007 VERIZON 32.94 AP - 00257179 9/5/2007 VERIZON 30.93 AP - 00257179 9/5/2007 VERIZON 65.93 AP - 00257179 9/5/2007 VERIZON 34.89 AP - 00257179 9/5/2007 VERIZON 31.63 AP - 00257179 9/5/2007 VERIZON 32.53 AP - 00257179 9/5/2007 VERIZON 89.50 AP - 00257179 9/5/2007 VERIZON 97.59 AP - 00257179 9/5/2007 VERIZON 12].26 AP - 00257179 9/5/2007 VERIZON 89.75 AP - 00257179 9/5/2007 VERIZON 89.75 AP - 00257179 9/5/2007 VERIZON 87.23 AP-00257]79 9/5/2007 VERIZON 2].56 AP - 00257179 9/5/2007 VERIZON 279.21 AP - 00257179 9/5/2007 VERIZON 89.50 AP - 00257179 9/5/2007 VERIZON 19.75 AP - 00257179 9/5/2007 VERIZON 33.57 AP - 00257179 9/5/2007 VERIZON 31.56 AP - 00257179 9/5/2007 VERIZON 30.93 AP - 00257179 9/5/2007, VERIZON 195.98 AP - 00257179 9/5/2007 VERIZON 461.78 AP - 00257179 9/5/2007 VERIZON 33.57 AP - 00257180 9/5/2007 VILLASANO, ANNA 112.00 AP - 00257181 9/5/2007 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 9,446.40 AP - 00257182 9/5/2007 VISTA PAINT 938.07 AP - 00257182 9/5/2007 VISTA PAINT 92.74 AP - 00257182 9/5/2007 VISTA PAINT 447.12 AP - 00257182 9/5/2007 VISTA PAINT 125.65 AP - 00257183 9/5/2007 VOLM, LIZA 112.50 AP - 00257184 9/5/2007 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 276.70 AP - 00257184 9/5/2007 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 50.30 AP - 00257184 9/5/2007 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 75.81 AP - 00257184 9/5/2007 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 483.10 AP - 00257184 9/5/2007 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 1,336.74 AP - 00257184 9/5/2007 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 31.71 AP - 00257184 9/5/2007 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 168.05 AP - 00257184 9/5/2007 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 22.42 AP - 00257184 9/5/2007 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 221.22 AP - 00257184 9/5/2007 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 19.36 AP - 00257184 9/5/2007 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 284.33 AP - 00257184 9/5/2007 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 260.36 AP - 00257184 9/5/2007 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 649.78 AP - 00257184 9/5/2007 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 201.46 AP - 00257184 9/5/2007 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 43.59 AP - 00257185 9/5/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 155.90 AP - 00257185 9/5/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 42.30 AP - 00257185 9/5/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 42.74 AP - 00257185 9/5/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 32.33 AP - 00257185 9/5/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,316.62 AP - 00257187 9/5/2007 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 53.34 P61 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 23 Current Date: 09/12/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: ] 0:17:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P62 Agenda Check Register 8/29/2007 through 9/I 1/2007 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP - 00257187 9/5/2007 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 279.00 AP - 00257188 9/5/2007 WEST, DENNIS 1,000.00 AP - 00257189 9/5/2007 WHEELER, JESSICA 78.00 AP - 00257190 9/5/2007 WONG, OI FUN 40.00 AP - 00257191 9/5/2007 WORD MILL PUBLISHING 700.00 AP - 00257192 9/5/2007 WRIGHT, CHARLENE 40.00 AP - 00257193 9/5/2007 YEE, LARRY 46.00 AP - 00257194 9/5/2007 ZAROUR, MANAL 24.00 AP - 00257195 9/5/2007 ZARUBA, EDRIC 36.00 AP - 00257196 9/5/2007 ZENDEJAS, APRIL 32.00 AP - 00257198 9/6/2007 NOLO PRESS 4.34 AP - 00257199 9/6/2007 RIVOLI, UTE 95.96 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.01 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.66 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 83.91 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.17 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 83.06 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.86 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.48 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.48 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.45 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 90.38 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 88.66 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.51 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.79 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 9,015.58 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 96.85 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9,539.94 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 142.40 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.97 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.97 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.34 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.97 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 46.55 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.10 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.99 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.66 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.78 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.66 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.90 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.14 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.81 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.79 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.34 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.84 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.08 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 95.47 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.03 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 24 Current Date: 09/12/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:17:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P63 Agenda Check Resister 8/29/2007 through 9/11/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.19 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 113.07 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 88.35 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.22 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 102.07 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.98 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 111.95 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.64 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.83 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.01 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.15 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.66 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.53 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.98 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.99 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 185.21 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.80 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.24 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.46 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.98 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.82 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.98 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 14.34 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.21 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.98 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.83 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTT-TERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.11 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.71 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.49 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 103.83 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 97.65 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34,223.89 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 612.47 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54,813.88 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 413.81 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.73 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.63 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.32 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 14.85 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.34 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 138.58 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.95 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.31 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 159.36 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.07 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.66 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,853.06 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 25 Current Date: 09/12/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 10:17:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 8/29/2007 through 9/11/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.29 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.18 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 447.01 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 7,125.61 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 105.30 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 138.37 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 111.02 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.16 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.65 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 112.97 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8.48 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 118.47 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.66 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9.53 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.03 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.01 AP - 00257203 9/6/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.98 AP - 00257204 9/6/2007 VERIZON 433.06 AP - 00257204 9/6/2007 VERIZON 345.10 AP - 00257204 9/6/2007 VERIZON 2,076.89 AP - 00257204 9/6/2007 VERIZON 32.94 AP - 00257204 9/6/2007 VERIZON 89.75 AP - 00257204 9/6/2007 VERIZON 567.95 AP - 00257204 9/6/2007 VERIZON 50.32 AP - 00257204 9/6/2007 VERIZON 369.66 AP - 00257204 9/6/2007 VERIZON 32.94 AP - 00257204 9/6/2007 V ERIZON 89.50 AP - 00257205 9/10/2007 INTERNATIONAL PAVEMENT SOLUTIONS 2,934.18 AP - 00257205 9/10/2007 INTERNATIONAL PAVEMENT SOLUTIONS 4,334.00 AP - 00257205 9/10/2007 INTERNATIONAL PAVEMENT SOLUTIONS 531.63 Total for Check ID AP: 1,847,017.63 Total for Entity: 1,847,017.63 P64 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 26 Current Date: 09/12/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 10:17:2 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary August 31, 2007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Investments Par Value Market Value Book Value % of Portfolio Term Days to Matunly YTM 360 Equiv. VTM 365 Equiv. Local Agency Investment Fund 23,148,350.42 23,148,350 42 23,148,350.42 11.70 1 1 5.181 5.253 Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 153,822,000.00 153,385,908.79 153,667,448.47 77.66 1,522 781 4.354 4.414 Treasury Securities-Coupon 5,000,000.00 5,035,937.50 5002,343.75 2.53 661 546 4.654 4.719 Investment Agreements 16,051,446.03 16,051,446.03 16,051,448.03 8.11 1 1 3.632 3.682 198,021,796.45 197,621,642.74 197,869,588.67 100.00% 1,199 620 4.399 4.461 Investments Cash and Accrued Interest Passbook/Checking (not included in yield calculations) Accrued Interest at Purchase Subtotal Total Cash and Investments Total Earnin Current Year Average Daily Balance Effective Rate of Return 198,156,886.59 31 Month Ending 777,698.36 207,359,747.37 4.42 197,829,314.82 135,090.14 72,561.94 207,672.08 198,077,260.75 Fiscal Year To Date 1,548,991.43 209,860,202.08 4.35% 1 1 0.197 0.200 1.199 620 4.399 4.461 I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in comformi[y with the investment policy adopted December 20, 2006. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the neM six months estimated expenditures. The month-end market values were obtained from (IDC)-Interactive Data Corporation pricing service. The attached Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the prior month's end is provided under the Cily offcial Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bond documents govern the management of these funds. On October 21, 2004 the City entered into a Investment Agreement with AegonlTransamerica in the amount of $15,600,000. The Investment Agreement will earn interest at 6.00% per annum through June 28, 2006 to provide funding for specific expenditures during that period. Beginning June 29, 2006 through October 21, 2009, the Investment Agreement will earn interest 2 4 %. d average annual rate of return over the five ye r period is 3.682% which is incorporated in the annual rate of return noted above / ~ Ja es C rost, Treasurer Reporting period 08/0112007-08/31/2007 Run Dale: 09I12I20W - 12:24 135,090.14 135 090.14 72,581.94 z07s7z.o8 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM1)SymRept e41.202b Repod Ver. 5.00 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details -Investments August 31, 2007 Page 2 Average Purchase Slated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Date Local Agency Investment Fund SYS00005 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 23,148,350.42 23,148,350.42 23,148,350.42 5.253 5.181 1 Subtotal antl Average 30,358,027.84 23,148,350.42 23,148,350.42 23,148,350.42 6.181 Federal Agency Issues -Coupon 31331DK55 1199 313310M79 1205 31331TFG1 1231 31331TND9 1244 31331TWH0 1253 31331TWJ6 1254 31331TG82 1263 31331TU25 1272 31331XNU2 1295 31331X205 1297 31331XA36 1309 31339XPL2 1213 3133X1P27 1237 3133X3DX8 1247 3133X4XF3 1256 3133XSWA2 1264 3133XAR25 1277 3133XAMW4 1279 3133XJVL9 1294 3133XK504 1299 3133XKUHfi 1308 3133XL304 1310 3133XLAH8 1312 3133XLBS1 1313 3128XiBD8 1198 3128XiDK0 1204 3128X1JD0 1208 3128X2P25 1257 3128X07G8 1258 3128X25Y7 1260 3126X38F9 1261 3128X3CS0 1262 Run Date: 09I1220W - 12.24 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT~BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/19/2003 2,500,000.00 2,466,406.25 2,496,875.00 3.120 3.104 261 05/19/2008 06/03/2003 2,000,000.00 1,973,125.00 2,000,000.00 3.210 3.166 276 06/03/2008 09/24/2003 2,000,000.00 1,998,125.00 1,996,562.50 3.375 3.374 23 09/24/2007 12/17/2003 2,000,000.00 1,983,125.00 2,000,000.00 3.970 3.916 290 06/17/2008 03/17/2004 2,000,000.00 1,980,000.00 2,000,000.00 3.240 3.196 198 03/17/2008 03/17/2004 4,000,000.00 3,935,000.00 3,997,500.00 3.550 3.517 443 11/17/2008 04/29/2004 3,500,000.00 3,459,531.25 3,479000.00 3.920 .4.012 422 10/27/2008 06/10/2004 3,000,000.00 2,989,687.50 3,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 100 12/10/2007 02/13/2007 5,000,000.00 5,010,937.50 5,000,000.00 5.350 5.277 895 02/12/2010 03/28/2007 5,000,000.00 5,007,812.50 5,000,000.00 5.250 5.178 1,670 03/28/2012 05/25/2007 4,000,000.00 4,041,250.00 4,000,000.00 5.050 4.981 1,362 05/25/2011 06/26/2003 2,000,000.00 1,996,875.00 2,000,000.00 2.450 2.417 25 09/26/2007 10/27!2003 3,000,000.00 2,969,062.50 3,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 422 10/27/2008 01/29/2004 2,000,000.00 1,994,375.00 2,000,000.00 3.355 3.310 58 10/29/2007 03/29/2004 2,000,000.00 1,988,750.00 2,000,000.00 3.500 3.453 118 12/28/2007 04/30/2004 2,000,000.00 1,983,750.00 2,000,000.00 3.210 3.167 151 01/30/2008 02/16/2005 1,000,000.00 991,875.00 1,000,000.00 4.080 4.024 352 06/18/2008 02/22/2005 1,000,000.00 994,062.50 999,750.00 4.000 3.954 174 02/22/2008 02/13/2007 5,000,000.00 5,043,750.00 5,000,000.00 5.000 4.929 1,287 03/11/2011 03/09/2007 5,000,000.00 4,993,750.00 4,998,750.00 5.000 5.031 130 01/09/2008 05/24/2007 4,000,000.00 4,008,750.00 3,984,000.00 5.150 5.190 1,361 05/24/2011 05/29/2007 4,000,000.00 4,026,250.00 4,000,000.00 5.350 5.277 1,732 05/29/2012 08/18/2007 3,000,000.00 3,015,937.50 3,000,000.00 5.600 5.523 1,752 06/18/2012 06/25/2007 3,000,000.00 3,015,000.00 3,0110,000.00 5.500 5.425 1,028 06/25/2010 05/19/2003 5,000,000.00 4,943,025.21 4,993,750.00 3.500 3.479 261 05/19/2008 05/28/2003 4,000,000.00 3,979,776.00 4,000,000.00 3.100 3.058 88 11/28/2007 06/12/2003 5,000,000.00 4,922,499.85 4,998,500.00 3.030 2.995 284 06/11/2008 03/30/2004 3,000,000.00 2,961,140.90 3,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 576 03/30/2009 04/12/2004 1,250,000.00 1,237,425.04 1,248,750.00 3.650 3.626 249 05/07/2008 04/19/2004 2,000,000.00 1,994070.13 1,997,600.00 2.920 2.916 48 10/19/2007 04/26/2004 1,000,000.00 997,088.01 1,000,000.00 3.280 3.235 55 10/26/2007 04/29/2004 5,000,000.00 4,985,884.86 5,000,000.00 3.450 3.403 58 10/29/2007 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF PM2)BymRept641.202b Q1 Report Ver. 5.00 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details -Investments August 31, 2007 Page 3 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Date Federal Agency Issues -Coupon 3128X3FC2 1267 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/24/2004 3,000,000.00 2,989,881.14 2,999,062.50 3.750 3.708 83 11/23/2007 3128XSC48 1293 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 02/08/2007 5,000,000.00 5,011,244.97 5,000,000.00 5.375 5.301 891 02/08/2010 313396PE7 1296 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 02/26/2007 1,572,000.00 1,557,380.51 1,514,835.97 5.250 5.178 73 11/13/2007 3128XSR75 1298 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 03/20/2007 2,000,000.00 2,006,510.01 1,996,600.00 5.250 5.217 1,657 03/15/2012 3128XSR75 1302 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/04/2007 3,000,000.00 3,009,765.02 2,993 400.00 5.250 5.228 1,657 03/15/2012 3128XSK80 1306 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/10/2007 5,000,000.00 5,024,904.64 5,000,000.00 5.400 5.324 1,644 03/02/2012 3136F32F2 1222 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 07/29/2003 4,000,000.00 3,941,250.00 3,993,750.00 3.300 3.289 332 07/29/2008 3136FSEE7 1250 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 03/05/2004 3,000,000.00 2,959,687.50 2,999,062.50 3.750 3.707 464 12/08/2008 3136F5GP0 1252 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 03/16/2004 4,000,000.00 3,952,500.00 4,000,000.00 4.040 3.985 562 03/16/2009 3136FSPB1 1259 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/12/2004 1,000,000.00 997,500.00 1,000,000.00 3.020 2.979 41 10/12/2007 3136F6V06 1278 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 02/22/2005 2,000,000.00 1988,125.00 1,998,600.00 4.000 3.970 174 02/22/2008 3136FBGC3 1300 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 03/09/2007 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 4,998,250.00 5.260 5.196 1,649 03/07/2012 3136F8FW0 7301 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 03/07/2007 5,000,000.00 5,015,625.00 5,000,000.00 5.430 5.356 1,283 03/07/2011 3136FBLU7 1304 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/09/2007 5,000,000.00 5,010,937.50 4,996,250.00 5.250 5.199 1,346 05/09/2011 31398ABC5 1307 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/21/2007 3,000,000.00 3,011,250.00 2,991,000.00 5.300 5.296 1,710 05/07/2012 31398ADF6 1311 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 06/12/2007 4,000,000.00 4,021,250.00 3,995,600.00 5.600 5.548 1,746 06/12/2012 Subtotal and Average 154,826,924.28 153,822,000.00 157,785,908.79 153,667,448.47 4.35d 781 Treasury Securities -Coupon 912828GJ3 1305 TREASURY NOTE 05/09/2007 5,000,000.00 5,035,937.50 5,002,343.75 4.750 4.654 548 02/28/2009 Subtotal antl Average 5,002,143.75 5,000,000.00 5,035,937.50 5,002,343.75 4.654 546 Investment Agreements SY51275 1275 AEGON/TRANSAMERICA Subtotal and Average 16,020,372.00 16, 051,446.03 16,051,446.03 16,051,446.03 16,051,446.03 16,051446.03 3.682 3.632 1 16,051,446.03 3.632 1 Total and Average 207,359,747.J7 Run Date 09/122007 -12:24 198,021,796.45 197,621,642.74 197,869,588.67 4.399 620 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRep16.41.202b ~ V City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details -Cash August 31, 2007 Page 4 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to CUSIP Inves[ment# - Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Mootly's 360 Maturity SavingslMiscellaneous Accounts SYS00160 00160 BANK OF AMERICA 135,090.14 135,090.14 135,090.14 0.200 0.197 1 Average Balance 0.00 Accrued Interest at Purchase 72,581.94 72,581.94 1 Subtotal 207,fi72.08 207,672.08' Total Cash and lnvestmentss 207,359,747.37 198,156,886.59 197,829,314.82 196,077,260.75 4.399 620 Run Oaie: 09/72/2007 - 12:24 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2)SymRept641.202b ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Pages Activity By Type Aug ust 1, 2007 through August 31, 2007 Beginning Statetl Transaction Purchases Retlemptions Entling CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Rale Date or Deposits or WlNtlrawals Balance Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary) SVS00005 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 5.253 3,500,000.00 10,500,000.00` Subtotal 30,146,350.42 3,500,000.00 10,500,000.00 23,148,350.42 Savings/Miscellaneous Accounts (Monthly Summary) SYS00780 00180 RANK OF AMERICA 0.200 0.00 1,050,889.01 Subtotal 1,185,979.15 0.00 1,050,889.01 135,090.14 Federal Agency Issues -Coupon 313310705 1226 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 3.050 08/13/2007 0.00 2,995,312.50 Subtotal 156,662,760.97 0.00 2,995,312.50 153,667,448.47 Treasury Securities -Coupon Subtota I 5,002,343.75 Investment Agreements (Monthly Summary) SVS1275 1275 AEGON /TRANSAMERICA 3.682 Suhtotal 16,079,336.20 32,109.83 0.00 32,109.83 0.00 Total 209,018,770.49 Run Oate'. 0 911 2 /2 0 0] -12:24 3,532,109.83 14,546,201.61 5,002,34},75 16,051,446.03 198,004,676.81 Portfolio CITY PM (PRF_PM3) SymRept 6,4L2~ Report Ver. St)0 City of Rancho Cucamonga Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents For the Month Ended July 31, 2007 Bond Issue Assessment District No 93-1 Masi Plaza Trustee and/or Paving Agent Account Name Wells Fargo Imprvmnt Fund Reserve Fund Redemp. Fund Investment Money Market Fund Money Market Fund Money Market Fund Purchase Maturity Cost Date Date Vield Value 8/4/1997 NIA' 4.40% $ 281,913.27 8/4/1997 N/A 4.40% 248,913.86 8/4/1997 N/A` 4.70% 42.69 $ 530,869.82 PFA RFDG Rev Bonds series Wells Fargo Expense Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A` 1999 A (Sr) & 1999 B (Subord) Sub Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A" Sr. Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A` Redemption Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A` Revenue Fund First American Treasury Obligation 3/2/2000 N/A' Residual Fund First American Treasury Obligation 1/16/2001 N/A` CFD No 2000-03 Rancho Summit Wells Fargo Special Tax Eund Money Market Fund 10/13/2005 N/A Reserve Fund Money Market Fund 1 0/1 312 0 0 5 N/A Escrow Fund Money Market Fund 10/13/2005 N/A Project Fund Money Market Fund 10/13/2005 N/A Cost of Issuance Fund Money Market Fund 10/13/2005 NIA Interest Account Money Market Fund 10/13/2005 NIA CFD No 2000-01 South Etiwanda 0.00% $ - 4.40% 604,883 .92 4.40% 1,136,347 .75 5.22 % 19 .23 4.40% 39,389 .06 4.40% 376,781 .97 $ 2,157,421 .93 4.40% $ 199,193.73 4.40% 697,340.53 0.00% - 4.40% 7,078,841.95 4.40% 139,723.45 4.40% 24,571.79 $ 8,139,671.45 Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 N/A 4.41 % $ 2,546.94 Reserve Fund Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 N/A 4.40% 111,830.82 Admin Expense Fund Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 N/A 4.92% 61.20 Acquisition Fund Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 NIA 4.85% 88,194.27 Interest Account Money Market Fund 8/31/2006 NIA 0.00% 4.67 Principal Account Money Market Fund 8/31/2006 N/A 0.00% 4.57 $ 202,642.47 "D J O Trustee andlor Purchase Maturity Cost Bond Issue Paving Agent Account Name Investment Date Date Yield Value CFD No 2000-02 RC Corporate Park Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 N/A 4.40% $ 15,572.70 Reserve Fund Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 N/A 4.40% 682,828.45 Admin Expense Fund Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 N/A 4.92 % 61.20 Acquisition Fund Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 N/A 4.85% 559,906.16 Interest Account Money Market Fund 8/31/2006 N/A 4.03% 24.93 Principal Account Money Market Fund 8/31/2006 N/A 6.73% 14.91 $ 1,258,408.35 CFD No 2003-01 Improvement Areas #1 Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A 4.40°/ $ 5,860.05 Reserve Fund Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A 4.40% 1,469,899.84 Developer Project Fund Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A 4.40% 500,895.16 Agency Project Fund Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A 4.40% 417,926.68 Cultural Center Fund Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A 4.40% 501,897.22 Interest Account Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A 4.40% 27,709.77 $ 2,924,190.72 CFD No 2003-01 Improvement Areas #2 Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A 0.00% $ 0.13 Reserve Fund Money Market Fund 811/2003 N/A 4.40% 298,607.12 Interest Account Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A 8.71 % 11.52 Agency Project Fund Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A 0.00% 0.18 $ 298,618.95 CFD No 2001-01 Improvement Areas #1 & #2 Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund Money Market Fund 9/18/2001 N/A 4.41% $ 4,373.11 Reserve Fund Money Market Fund 9/18/2001 N/A 4.40% 1,106,292.98 Developer Project Fund Money Market Fund 9/18/2001 1/4/1900 4.41°/ 4,941.85 Agency Project Fund Money Market Fund 9/18/2001 N/A 4.40% 3,790.13 Interest Account Money Market Fund 9/18/2001 N/A 3.73% 53.76 Admin Exp. Fund Money Market Fund 9/18/2001 N/A 4.40% 158,876.23 Principal Account Money Market Fund 8/31/2006 N/A 3.22% 31.12 $ 1,278,359.18 CFD No 2001-01 Improvement Areas #3 Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund Money Market Fund 9118/2001 N/A 4.41 % $ 2,411.47 Reserve Fund Money Market Fund 9/18/2001 N/A 4.40% 80,450.78 Developer Project Fund Money Market Fund 9/1 812 0 01 N/A 4.40% 8,878.87 Admin Exp. Fund Money Market Fund 9/18/2001 N/A 4.40% 31,775.25 Interest Accounl Money Market Fund 8/31/2006 N/A 0.00°/ 4.03 Principal Account' Money Market Fund 8!31/2006 N/A 0.00% 1.98 $ 123,522.38 v Bond Issue CFD No 2004-01 Rancho Etiwanda Estates CFD No 2006-01 Vintner's Grove CFD No 2006-02 Amador on Route 66 Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Cost Paving Agent Account Name Investment Date Date Yield Value Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund Money Market Fund 7/1 312 0 0 6 NIA Reserve Fund Money Market Fund 7/13/2006 N/A Escrow Fund Money Market Fund 7!13/2006 N/A Project Fund Money Market Fund 7/13!2006 N/A Cost of Issuance Fund Money Market Fund 7/13/2006 N/A Interest Accounl Money Market Fund 7/13/2006 N/A Cap Interest Fund Money Market Fund 7/13/2006 NIA 0.00% $ - 4.85% 3,103,235. 68 0.00% 0. 00 4.85°/ 5,599,319. 92 0.00% 0. 00 4.85% 2,444. 25 0.00°/ 0. 00 $ 8,704,999. 85 Wells Fargo Special Taz Fund Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A 0.00% Reserve Fund Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A 5.00% Acquisition Fund Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A 5.00° Agency Account Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 NIA 5.00 Cost of Issuance Fund Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A 5.00% Interest Account Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 NIA 5.00% Water District Account Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A 5.00 Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 NIA 0.00% Reserve Fund Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A 5.00% Acquisition Fund Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 NIA 5.00% Agency Account Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 NIA 5.00% Cost of Issuance Fund Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A 5.00% Interest Account Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A 5.00% Water District Fund Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 NIA 5.00% $ - 391,070.57 3,604,304.76 752,970.05 106,532.41 144,377.28 672,171.94 $ 5,671,427.01 $ - 204,453.58 1,446,910.22 426,570.65 80,069.71 74,084.83 610,276.10 $ 2,842,365.09 34,132,497.20 TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS Nate: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated upon demand. E 34,132,497.20 J N STAFF REPORT ~ - ~ F VCiIRELRING DHP9 RT~fENT RANCHO Date: September 19, 2007 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer Subject: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION O AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE 12 KV ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION IMPROVEMENTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS TO BE FUNDED FROM MUNICIPAL UTILITY FUNDS RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the 12 KV Electrical Distribution Improvements at Various Locations, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" and receive bids. BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS The 12 KV Electrical Distribution Improvements at Various Locations scope of work consists of constructing a complete electrical distribution system including, but not limited, to cable and equipment installation, at four (4) separate locations. The locations are: southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue (aka Footchester), northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue (aka Victoria Promenade), east side of Rochester Avenue south of Foothill Boulevard (aka Rochester Park LLC) and southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Jersey Boulevard (aka Haven/Jersey Office Park). The contract documents call for sixty (60) working days to complete this construction. The project will be funded from Municipal Utility Funds. Staff has determined that the project is Categorically Exempt per CEQA guidelines. The project plans and specifications were completed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate is $645,000. Legal advertising is scheduled for September 25 and October 2, 2007, with a bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, October 16, 2007, unless extended by Addenda. Re ectfully su mute ~ ~J// >~~ William J. O'Neil City Engineer P73 WJO:JAD:Is Attachment P74 RESOLUTION NO. C.~7- 2ZZ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "12 KV ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION IMPROVEMENTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS" AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council has prepared specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "12 KV ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION IMPROVEMENTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council will receive at the OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK IN THE OFFICES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ON OR BEFORE THE HOUR OF 2:00 P.M. ON TUESDAY, October 16, 2007 sealed bids or proposals for "12 KV ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION IMPROVEMENTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council, California, marked, "12 KV ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION IMPROVEMENTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on P75 Resolution No. September 19, 2007 Page 2 file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provision of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: 1. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or 2. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or 3. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or 4. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. P76 Resolution No. September 19, 2007 Page 3 The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including but not limited to a Class "A" (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the California Business and Professions Code, Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non-refundable. P77 Resolution No. September 19, 2007 Page 4 Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non- reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for the "12 KV ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION IMPROVEMENTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS" may be directed to: MichaelTenEyck Utility Operations Manager Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 (909) 477-2740, ext. 4035 By order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 19'" day of September, 2007. ADVERTISE ON: September 25, 2007 and October 2, 2007 8' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 12KV ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION IMPROVEMENTS VARIOUS LOCATIONS i ~' ~N N.T.S. P79 STAFF REPORT- EVGINEF_R]uG DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: September 19, 2007 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Cindy Hackett, Associate Civil EngineerC~ Subject: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE LA SENDA AND ETIWANDA CHANNEL ACCESS RAMPS AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO 1 1 1 230 3 56 50/1 5571 1 2-0 AND 11123035650/1558112-0 (GENERAL DRAINAGE FUNDS) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for the construction of the La Senda and Etiwanda Channel Access Ramps and Foothill Boulevard Drainage Improvements and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS La Senda and Etiwanda Channel Access Ramps and Foothill Boulevard Drainage Improvements scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but not limited to, the installation of storm drain, replacement of curb & gutter, sidewalk and driveway, channel ramps and cross gutter and spandrels, replacement of chain link fence gate in like and kind and replacement of portion of retaining wall. The project is to be funded from General Drainage funds, Account No. 1 1 1 23035650/1 5571 1 2-0 and 11123035650/1558112-0. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt per Article 19, Section 15301(c) of the CEQA guidelines. The Engineer's estimate for the La Senda and Etiwanda Channel Access Ramps and Foothill Boulevard Drainage Improvements is $120,000. Legal advertising is scheduled for September 25 and October 2, 2007, with bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, October 9, 2007. Respy,~ctfully bmitt~ ,;' 7 ,/ 1%v~- William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:CH:Is Attachments P80 LA SENDA AND ETI~PANDA CHANNEL ACCESS RAMPS AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ADDITIVE SEE DETAIL "A" ~ ROJECT SITE r •• : _ _ ALMS~ID ~DR _ HIL"LSI E D ~~~ ~ ~• ~ F ~ ^ ^ ILSO AVE - 24TH ST I' ~ ~ BAN T'"I ST ~ ~ < ~~ _ .. . I SU MIT AV \ a EMO ~~ VE U ~ _ ~ HIGH ND AV o 30 I a m w w H ST z y z~ ~ _J VICTORI PARK N~ w v N~ B LINE D J a Y 4 J w O f ~ w HUR ST (~II~\\~RR U C m Z O ^ ^ ICJ ~/1~ FOQTHILL BLVD 66 w 105 0 CI CENTE DR. wi ARROW RT. ~ = o ~ ~ " RROW ROU a' o' 9 H STREET ^^ N z ~' N ~ I o a < BNSF R c~ o = o 6TH ST z II~ _ ~ PROJECT SIT L • ~ ~ ~ • .4TH ST _ , , ~ , , ? , , CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA VICINITY MAP x P81 RESOLUTION NO. 0 7- ,~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE LA SENDA AND ETIWANDA CHANNEL ACCESS RAMPS AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared specifications forthe construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the specifcations presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications forthe "La Senda and Etiwanda Channel Access Ramps and Foothill Boulevard Drainage Improvements": BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required bylaw for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, October 9, 2007, sealed bids or proposals for the "La Senda and Etiwanda Channel Access Ramps and Foothill Boulevard Drainage Improvements" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "La Senda and Etiwanda Channel Access Ramps and Foothill Boulevard Drainage Improvements": PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the offce of the City Clerk of P82 RESOLUTION NO. September 19, 2007 Page 2 the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen thatwill be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices tojourneymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices orjourneymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall complywith the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements maybe obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. P83 RESOLUTION NO. September 19, 2007 Page 3 Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, inform and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A"License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, togetherwith the expiration date, and be signed P84 RESOLUTION NO. September 19, 2007 Page 4 by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City. Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, togetherwith an additional non reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 19`h day of September, 2007 Publish Dates: September 25, 2007 and October 2, 2007 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 19`" day of September, 2007. Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk P85 RESOLUTION NO. September 19, 2007 Page 5 I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 19th day of September, 2007,. Executed this 19th day of September, 2007, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: September 25, 2007 and October 2, 2007 STAFF REPORT- C!~GINL"ERI;vG DEP.~IRTTIEIVT r RANCHO Date: September 19, 2007 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer Subject: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 2007/2010 MEASURE "I" THREE- YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR MEASURE "I" FUNDS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Local Measure "I" Three-Year Capital Improvement Program as requested by SANBAG to provide a public record of the intended use of Local Measure "I" Funds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Measure "I", the county-wide transportation sales tax program, requires that each local jurisdiction receiving revenues annually adopt aFive-Year Capital Improvement Program and aTwenty-Year Transportation Plan which outlines the specific projects upon which those funds shall be expended. With the close out of the current Measure I less than five years away, each jurisdiction is required to submit a plan for the remaining years. Also, since SANBAG has the Twenty-Year Transportation Plan on file the plan no longer needs to be submitted. Staff has prepared the attached Three-Year Capital Improvement Plan schedule to be adopted by City Council and kept on file with the San Bernardino Associated Governments for informational purposes. The Three-Year list has been over-programmed to allow for spillage and to insure that the adopted plan contains ample projects for Measure "I" expenditures. If changes are necessary (additions or deletions), the plan may be altered at each annual adoption or intermittently with City Council approval. Respectfully submitted, ~ ~ ~~/` i`'~~dY~ William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JAD:Is P86 Attachment P87 RESOLUTION NO. D7'2~ 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 2007/2010 MEASURE "I" THREE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BEGINNING IN FISCAL YEAR 2007/08 FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MEASURE "I" FUNDS WHEREAS, San Bernardino County voters approved passage of Measure "I" in November, 1989 authorizing San Bernardino Associated Governments, acting as the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, to impose cone-half of one percent retail transactions and use tax applicable in the incorporated and unincorporated territory of the County of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, revenue from the tax can only be used for transportation improvement and traffic management programs authorized in the Expenditure Plans set forth in Ordinance No. 89-1 of Authority; and WHEREAS, Expenditure plans of the Ordinance requires each local jurisdiction receiving revenue from the tax to expend those funds pursuant to a Five-Year Capital Improvement Program and Twenty-Year Transportation Plan adopted by resolution of the local jurisdiction, and WHEREAS, Expenditure Plans of the Ordinance also require that each local jurisdiction annually adapt and update the Five and Twenty-Year plans, and WHEREAS, with the close out of the current Measure "I" less than five years away a plan for the remaining years (Three-Year) shall be submitted, and WHEREAS, since SANBAG has the Twenty-Year Transportation Plan on file the plan no longer needs to be submitted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, hereby adopts the Measure "I" Three-Year Capital Improvement Program, a copy of which is attached to this resolution. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEASURE I THREE YEAR PLAN 2007/10 MAP NO. YEAR STREET 8 LIMITS IMPROVEMENT ~ COST ESTIMATE 07/08 ADA Corrective Measures -City Wide Intersection ramps and driveway modifications $ 100,000 1 Archibald Ave - 19th St to Banyan Pavement Rehabilitation $ 4,074 2 Archibald Ave -Banyan to Hillside Pavement Rehabilitation $ 66,313 3 Arrow Rte - at Etiwanda TS Modification Traffic Signal Modification $ 72,008 4 Arrow Rte -Hermosa to Haven Pavement Rehabilitation $ 8,629 5 Arrow Rte - W/O Etiwanda to East City Limit Pavement Rehabilitation $ 425,000 6 Banyan St -Carnelian to Beryl Pavement Rehabilitation $ 300,000 7 Banyan St -Sapphire to Carnelian Pavement Rehabilitation $ 189,087 8 Base Line Rd -West City Limits to Carnelian Pavement Rehabilitation $ 23,435 9 Beryl St - N/O 210 to N/0 Banyan Pavement Rehabilitation and Storm Drain $ 650,000 10 Carnelian St -Wilson to Almond Pavement Rehabilitation $ 44,242 11 Church St -Archibald to Hermosa Pavement Rehabilitation and Widening $ 337,811 12 Church St - at Rochester Ave TS Modification Traffic Signal Modification $ 295,550 Contract Services -Concrete Maintenance Concrete Maintenance $ 800,000 13 Hellman Ave - W/0 Hellman to Amethyst Pavement Widening, Rehabilitation and Storm Drain $ 1,930,000 14 Hermosa Ave -Foothill to Effen Pavement Rehabilitation and Widening $ 420 Local Streets -City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation $ 300,000 15 Milliken Ave - 7th to Arrow Pavement Rehabilitation $ 10,000 Pavement Management Evaluate Pavement Condition $ 64,948 16 Terra Vista Prkwy -Spruce to Milliken Pavement Rehabilitation $ 300,000 17 Valle Vista Dr - Calle Sur to Valle Vista School Sidewalk $ 20,000 18 Wilson Ave -Archibald to Haven Pavement Rehabilitation $ 550,000 FY 07/08 Total $ 6,491,517 Page 1 of 2 9/13/2007 ~ ao _ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MAP NO. YEAR MEASURE I T STREET & LIMITS HREE YEAR PLAN 2007/10 IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE 08/09 ADA Corrective Measures -City Wide Intersection ramps and driveway modifications $ 100,000 19 Contract Services -Concrete Maintenance Hillside Rd -Carnelian to Beryl Concrete Maintenance Pavement Rehabilitation $ 500,000 $ 250,000 Local Streets -City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation $ 800,000 20 Milliken Ave - 7th to Arrow Pavement Rehabilitation $ 600,000 21 Vineyard Ave - 8th to Foothill Pavement Rehabilitation $ 550,000 FY 08/09 Total $ 2,800,000 09/10 ADA Corrective Measures -City Wide Intersection ramps and driveway modifications $ 100,000 22 Banyan St -Beryl to Archibald Pavement Rehabilitation $ 400,000 Contract Services -Concrete Maintenance Concrete Maintenance $ 500,000 23 Haven Ave - 4th St to 7th St Pavement Rehabilitation $ 300,000 24 Haven Ave - Jersey to Foothill Pavement Rehabilitation $ 300,000 25 Hillside Rd -Beryl to Archibald Pavement Rehabilitation $ 350,000 Local Streets -City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation $ 800,000 FY 09/10 Total $ 2,750,000 Three Year Total $ 12,041,517 Measure I Revenue Estimate (3 Yrs.) from SANBAG $ 7,678,000 Rancho Cucamonga Measure I Fund Balance $ 7,072,000 Total Measure I Revenue Estimate (3 Yrs.) $ 14,750,000 Contact: Jer A. D er, Senior Civil En ineer 909 477-2740 Ext, 4037 Page 2 of 2 9/13/2007 ~ 1 .~ . J ~ ~.~ ~..=-__ -- :.____ I-~~_-..- ~ - -,mss -- --••~. .---- - ~" ---- _•=__= '~ 10 1e 2s Ij -'=_== wus~ aD I R I - ~1=_awy~mwc ~' S 1e ~ "m"om '___-~ • I __ -- 1 va .vf. - - ~ vnml •v r- • ~ l _ •. 6 ~ n. 1 _ _ ~~ _____ 9 1 wraawm •v. p } ~ -sio fWY • ~maum-~~ _ _ • ,~ evc __ ~ Warn w 210 FWY wM ST. ~~ / 1 ~ PMIX LN V~CIOM ST. RMIC v~sTi sr. sT. • UPLAND 1 s ~ ~ ssnx ^ ~ ~ ~ ~mRn S P R R ~ •• FONTANA ~ ~~ i 5~~~ ' R CIRrtUI x. $$ • 17 (~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 12 ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~y - ~~ 14 ~ rrmrm~ avR. ~' „,~, a a ii ~ LEGEND: y+ ~~ a~^ ~•+ I 07/~ 8 PRQIEC7S ~, 24 ~ 08/09PRQ1EC7S q ~r ~mnc ~' 3 5 • 09 10 PRQIECR ~~ ~' 27 I n~ ,~n a ~AVa < 15,20 •T LSf RR _,r ~ ,- -- ., ~ _ _ ._. ~I ~~ ~• ^®~ ~. ,~T ~ ~ I MEASURE I ~ ~' ~ ~ THREE YEAR PLAN • ,,, ~, (2007 TO 2010) N.T.S - - ~ - - - °'°^'°°" ONTARIO CITY OF ' ~~~ P~ ~-w faQV.r RANCHO ~ CUCAMONGA OD W N STAFF REPORT ; ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Date: September 19, 2007 UCAMONGA C To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Mark Brawthen, Contract Engineer Subject: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO SUMMARILY VACATE A PORTION OF ROCHESTER AVENUE (CHARLES SMITH AVENUE), APPROXIMATELY 460 FEET SOUTH OF SIXTH STREET, V-211 RELATED PROJECT PARCEL MAP 16009 It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the summary vacation of a portion of excess Rochester Avenue right-of--way, located approximately 460 feet south of Sixth Street and directing the City Clerk to present same to the County Recorder for recordation. The re-aligmnent of Charles Smith Avenue has been completed along a new alignment immediately west of the existing location. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Chase Back Bay, LLC is currently processing SUBTPM16009 (Parcel Map 16009), a four parcel commercial subdivision on 4.86 acres of land. Planning Commission approved this parcel map on June 28, 2006. The map vas conditioned to realign the portion of Rochester Avenue (Charles Smith Avenue) south of Sixth Street and to align it with the portion of the street north of Sixth Street. Utility companies, other agencies and various City Divisions were notified of the proposed vacation. There were no objections, however, all existing underground utilities will remain within the existing street and reservation of easements for these utilities will be maintained over the original alignment. On September 12, 2007, the Planning Commission detem~ined that the vacation of the excess Rochester Avenue right-of--way, to approximately 460 feet south of Sixth Street is in conformance with the General Plan and recommended that said vacation occur. Respectfully submrttgd '' / ~//J~ ~ ,,L- ' William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MB:tly Attachments: Vicinity map P89 Resolution V-211 (Exhibits "A" & "B") Vicinity Map N. T.S. . N. ~ _ __ o -VPubte &rch Dr `x _ a''f NiT ',d 9 V _._- ._._._ l~ - !- ~1 I ~ I``I I'_ ~ Iry i -_~ 6- ((. ~.v_ li ~.__..... _._.Jfrsey_Blvd i~ ;-- -. r ~ ,`- - r ' ' -' z JL I I ~pmPlre Lekes ~I' CaUrse- -- n im .. _ , i~ , 4 '.~ N Q, IXi IS - 1' I I~_+--._I .~.~ o-~----"g ~- .... ~,q I th St ~° ~.~,. L ~ ~ ~ .`~ .~,J L._ N ~.. ~ /~ ~r ~ ... ~ ~~ . i~ ~.. ~;I I9 Tli t .J ~A.~ _._. < r ~ ~-"~ ~I =~ r --1~--~I ~ ~ r fAN _ I F'~ ~ pl MARINb j~ ,Ir F~ jk ~I . ; ~ St, 1.11sslon Par Dr ~~ ~ VlstiDi Dr E MKSl0f1 . _ r 1 i ! _ r 1: II y. y. !tea A _~ ~.~..:. ~ L- EClwan • p'- EW ALI4NMEN1' CH~RLES SMITH /~,VE, I I~ a Conoours Sti'."7 ,r d T r ~ d E ~ I I `E Conrours A5~ _ _ - ja c is ~ 2002 R1ap0uest Ir~. !`"`_ a-t-+ S` _. 'i Z ~fu 200?NrVTEQ ITEM: Street Vacation V-211 TITLE: Vicinity Map EXHIBIT: 1 City of Rancho Cucamonga P91 RESOLUTION NO. (' 7 Z A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF EXCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 460 FEET SOUTH OF SIXTH STREET, V-211 WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8334, of the Streets and Highway Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate the excess right-of--way located approximately 460 feet south of sixth street; and WHEREAS, on September 12, 2007, the Planning Commission determined that the vacation of excess right-of--way located approximately 460 feet south of Sixth Street, is in conformance with the General Plan and recommended that the vacation occur; and WHEREAS, the City Council found by all the evidence submitted that the excess street right-of--way is not required for street and highway purposes; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby makes its order vacating excess street right-of--way located approximately 460 feet south of Sixth Street, as described in Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B". SECTION 2: That the subject vacation shall be subject to the reservation and exception for existing utilities and City drainage facilities on record. SECTION 3: That from and after the date the Resolution is recorded, said excess street right-of--way no longer constitutes a public easement. SECTION 4: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of the resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. SECTION 5: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. i d0 L 133H5 60-0£-9 532iIdX3 3SN3011 '1V0 j0 31'd,0 LEIS Sld 'OIMIIIH '0 Nb`1V a\~~~j\ ~fbrs LOOZ 'ZZ 3Nflf ~31V0 - G / (~ 60-Of-9 'dX3 OZO-9ZZ ~'ON 3lld - * Cf lS 'oN L£LS-9Z9 (889) 66£Z6 d0 'odloonA "P^IB od~o~nA b091f r -~/'~~/x~/J ~ V/N ~31V05 ~Oll 'MOJ0000-OIMIIIH XQ Pa~oda~d o ~ j ~(~~ a o ~~s ~7/ H ~ ~a y~~, ~N bl ldN~ SS37 ~l0 3~10iN 133d 3116'/JOS ShZ'4/ SN/b1N0.~ ONV7 d0 73.7~/b'd 07VS '9N/NN/938 .~0 1N/Od 3H1 Ol 133d F0:90Y d0 30NdIS/0 b' 3N/7 ,17~J31S3M 0/ti5 9N07d 1Sb3 „ l S,O1.00 HI~/ON 3.7N3H1 •3/1N3~1 d (~131S3NOOd~ 30Nd~10 d0 133d 00'09 .17/31569 0/b5 d0 3N/7 .(71l31S3M 3H1 Ol 133d !! LZ d0 HSON37 0~/6' NN ONN „OS, dS.ZO 30 379N6' 7Yb1N30 b' HO/JO~IHI :7r1~1/JO 1N3JNb1 0/t~S 9N076' .17~/31Sd3H1/IOS 30N3H1 •1333 OOF'FS 30 5/1/0621 6' 9NG167~1 ;(7~13153MH1/!OS 3r1bON00 3r1t1/70 IN30N61 6' 30 9N/NN/038 3H1 Ol 1333 FS"66/ 30 30Nb1S/0 b' 1SV3 eBl,OZ.!/ Hl/70S 3.~N3N1 •1333 68 f6 30 H10N37 Ob6' NV ON6' , 60, !F. / l 30 370Nd 76?J1N30 d HO/102/Hl 3rt~//JO IN39N61 0/65 ON076' .(7~/3H1/lOS 30N3N1 1333 00'L9Y 30 S/J/Od~l Y 9Nlr1YH ;(7131569 3rll~JN00 3rtt//IO 1N3JN61 6' 30 ,9N/NN/J3B 3H1 Ol 133d 03 A9 d0 3.7Nb1S/0 V 1S3M ,15,0!.00 H1/JOS 30N3H1 •Y333 9Y ZF 30 3,7Nb1S/0 V IS3M ,FS,OFdY HlIIOS 3.7N3H1 •1333 Zl 'OF 30 3.7NbISlO 6' 3N17 73776'd~Yd 0/65 ON07b' 1S3M ,FZ,OS.tiB HIOOS 30N3H1 •;9NlNN/93A 10 1NlOd 3H1 9N136 133~1IS H1XlS 0/t~5 d0 3N17~131N3.7 3H1 30 .(7U3H1/JOS (S370Nb' 1H9/b Id 032//lSd3iY~ 133d 0009 1NbIS/0 ON6' HlIM 7377d~J6'd NM6'~l0 3N/7 b' NO 1N/Od 6' 01 133d 00'09 d0 3.7Nb15/0 b' 3N17 .(7!/31S3M 0/65 9N076' 1S3M , IS,O! .00 H1NOS 3.7N3H1 •;(!N/10.7 0/65 30 50210,7311 7b70/dd0 OZF 3.96'd 'LLl! J100A Nl 9F6! B! 1/391Y3030 0301/00321 :(LNlI0.7 0/65 30 S1/0S/~213d/)S 30 Ol/b'09 3H1 .10 NOl1/J70S321.19 0316"Jb~ :7/1N3ild (2131S3H~011) 30Nb?JO 30 1333 0009 ,(71/31Sti3 3H1 30 3N17 ,(71/31S3M 3H1 HI/M :llN/J0,7 0/65 .~0 SO~10.73~1 £Z ONd lZ 5396'd 'Y6! XOOB db~Y 730~/b'd N/ 030~/0.73~1 'lS9Sl ON d6'1Y 737116'd NO NMOHS S6' 1332115 H1X/S d0 3N172/31N3,7 3H1 d0 NOll03St131N1 3H1 16' 9NlON3iYiY0,7 •SM07703 S6' 038/21530 .(7~JY711,7/IJdd 3~J07Y :(lNn0.7 0/b5 d0 SO~10,73~/ OZ 306'd Sdb'1Y 30 6 N009 Nl 03 0110 0 321 ~/3153H0021 30 dt/iY 1/3d Sb' `d7NU0d/7b'.7 .!0 316'15 `ON/0~16'N~138 Nb5 30 ,(1N/)0.7 `I~JNO/Yt/J/),7 OH.7Nt~ 30 .(!/.7 3H1 N/ (30Nt~0~ 3/lN3r1b' 1/31S3H,702130 NO/1~/Od lbHl (/!Z-~l~ NO/ld/N.7S30 7b',937 3/7N3r1 b' 213153H~011 .10 NO/l~/Od 6' d0 NO/16',7b~ „`d~,1191HX3 Z6d P93 EXHIBIT "B" VAG4TlON OF A PORTION OF ROCHESTER AVENUE (V-211J SIXTH STREET NB9'S0 2,i E' ~_ <N89'S0 36 E> _ _ - - I - ~ I col 0 ~ I 'oo e POB :~ ~ ~- I ~., ° ~ti c 1 I W . -~ moo I ~~v°v b Z Z ~ O ni N o ~ ~ ~ 30' o ^~ ^~ b q,' a I Q W ~~~ ~yWN `~ V W I Q 2,n~i.~n n ~"~~ I ~ o00 " ~ > W aW I W ~ :n "~ ;~ a m m o I v bo N89'49 091Y(RJ n(n~L ~ m~ H H ~otip ~ ^ ~ J" J~ Q U V ~ VQ V V V V J ~~R _ o z ^ ~ I ~ ~ STREET L z o^ N I VACATION ~ o r ~ ~-m '~ ROCNES~ AVENUE Q o v z 3~= h 41 E(R) W ;~ h Q ~ ~ o N78'39 o ^o 0 o ~ I z ~ 0O 4 1 I ~n °~ ^' o~ ~ I Q Q~ ~~~ Q~~ h o v~ ~ a~ o G 0 ~ ~; ~ ~ ~ R ~" I W ~ ° ~ ~a 33' o , ^~ I ° as ~~~ ~ vv o 's o~~' I b s ~°o~Q~m I i I ~ I ~aPL LA,yp '" _ _ ~~ G . H ~ sG I N81'34'32'E~R~ ~~ P~ ~t,~ PG i I ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ G,.l(/°/~c' ~ Prepared by HIILWIG-GOODROW. LLC 37604 Yu^co~pa Blvd., Yucaipa, CA * No. 5731 * ~~ / n / // /~~ ', ,, EXP. 6-30-09 ,o. ~ / /! ,/ ~1 (J -RECORD DATA ~Q~ PER PMB 90/90-91 (J -RECORD DATA PER PMB 194/22-2J < > -RECORD DATA PER RS 49/4 STAFF REPORT , ENGINEERING DEP.~1RTnIENT RANCHO Date: September 19, 2007 ~UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Mark Brawthen, Contract Engineer Subject: APPROVAL OF A MAP, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 16009, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER AND SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SIXTH STREET AND CHARLES SMITH AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY CHASE BACK BAY, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 16009, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance Nos. 1 and 6, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Parcel Map No. 16009, located on the southeast corner and southwest corner of Sixth Street and Charles Smith Avenue in the General Industrial District (Subarea 13) Development District, was originally approved by the Planning Commission on May 14, 2003 for the division of 4.86 acres into 4 parcels. A time extension was approved by the Planning Commission on June 28, 2006 for the same division of land previously approved. The Developer, Chase Back Bay, LLC has previously submitted an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements. This agreement and security were approved by the City Council on November 1, 2006. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's Office. A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga Valley Water District. Copies of the agreement and securities that were approved on November 1, 2006 are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respe~ully s minted, ~~ ~'U~ William .l. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MB:CIv P94 Attachments: Vicinity map Resolution P95 Vicinity Map N. T.S. INh[fe_&rch Dr N ): ~.__. n ,,: - ry I ': _._..._.._ rr___... ..... - - - ~. i -. ._,_ '' -' A .-' i t ~ _}ptsey Blvd v_~ - ~~ -- ~~ g.. i; s '' Ir ~ e\ ~ ~ ' 'i ~! - iJ7 ~ ~ ~- c~ ~ ~; ~ Tn 5t _ , . I ~ ~ ~ --t `^s ~ Empke t ~ b a takes ~:~ J .~a6;H --. .~ - Golf r ~- R. ~ r 1 ,~ ~ ~ 1 ,; _ ' Sih St ftl. s - ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ E M~SSOn_VI i _ .ti -- I I~ 1'{ • AV y. . 'f L't x ~i;..,;. M APQU E'S'(. ~Gi ~ . -~ ~~ ~ IFP ~ r: ' ~~ ,~9 , -ath-S ch o ~. n-{ ~ 1 c ~ ` ~ ~ e on Palrl Dr _ ~ Dr I ! I I ~ ~~_~ c ~ Etlwan a •: ~., ~ ~ e~fl_i-y++-r~tc6r3^.~cpeha,&FSa~r,~a~.s_;-~-~-a--t- .-'-+`~ ~, '~+ ~I ~ ~- PAiiCEL lHNP lbdOq ~~ ~ E ~ ik P/af4CGLS '1 ~~%%z~~-6th 5t ~ I. _`' -CHARLtS SM17N HVE. ~I ~ _ 1.~Q ~~~, ,~, e ++ I 11'n ,:. fy . i 0 Ala ~~~ i 4th St-;' ~ ~~~'~ W T 1~. 7 1 t CO~CGU15 Avg _ ~ _ _ Z ....:. ~ G.._ ...-~ .~ 400 m ~ o~ilzoorT ITEM: Parcel Map 16009 TITLE: Vicinity Map EXHIBIT: 1 City of Rancho Cucamonga P96 RESOLUTION NO. d 7-2z A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 16009 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 16009) WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 16009, submitted by Chase Back Bay, LLC and consisting of 4 parcels, located on the southeast corner and southwest corner of Sixth Street and Charles Smith Avenue, being a division of 3.74 acres of land was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on May 14, 2003 and on June 28, 2006; WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 16009 is the final map of 4he division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Pazcel Map; and . WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES that said Parcel Map Number 16009 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. P97 RESOLUTION NO. 47 ~Z 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 16009 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "1972 Act"), said special maintenance district known and designated,as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 1972 Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owner of property within the tenritory to be aimexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding the such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be aimexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and P98 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvements. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including levy of all assessments; shall be applicable to the Territory. 2 PARCEL MAP 16009 P99 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owners of the Property are: Chase Back Bay, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company The legal description of the Property is: Real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bemazdino, State of Califomia, described as follows: PARCEL A: PARCEL 5 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 8550, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 90 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE(S) 90 AND 91, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF THE WEST 'h OF LOT 92, AS PER MAP OF ROCHESTER, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 9 OF MAPS, PAGE(S) 20, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, AND THE EAST 60 FEET OF ORANGE (ROCHESTER) AVENUE, VACATED BY RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SAID COUNTY, RECORDED DECEMBER 18, 1935 IN BOOK 1177, PAGE 320, OFFICIAL RECORDS, ADJOINING SAID LOT 92 ON THE WEST LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHERLY 30.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 92, AND SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHERLY 30.00 FEET OF SAID PORTION OF ORANGE (ROCHESTER) AVENUE VACATED, ADJOINING SAID LOT 92 ON THE WEST AND LYING WESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 92, DISTANT THEREON NORTH 89°51'13" EAST, 96.23 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG ANON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 8000 FEET, THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 2°08'57" FROM A TANGENT BEARING NORTH 0°06'32" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 300.08 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE PARALLEL TO AND DISTANT 30.00 FEET SOUTHERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 92. A-1 PARCEL MAP 16009 P100 PARCEL C: THAT PORTION OF THE WEST %2 OF LOT 91, MAP OF ROCHESTER, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 9 OF MAPS, PAGE(S) 2Q RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PORTION LYING WESTERLY OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL NO. 1 OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PER DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 29, 1972 IN BOOK 8070, PAGE 32, OFFICIAL RECORDS; AND THAT PORTION OF THE VACATED 60 FEET OF ORANGE (ROCHESTER) AVENUE, VACATED BY RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, RECORDED DECEMBER 18, 1936, IN BOOK 1177, PAGE 320 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, ADJOINING LOT 91 AS DESCRIBED ABOVE. APN: 0229-283-04 (AFFECTS: PARCEL B), 0229-283-OS (AFFECTS: PARCEL B) AND 0229-263-OS (AFFECTS: PARCEL A) The above described parcels are shown on sheet A-3 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. A-2 PARCEL MAP 16009 EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 srm siREFI umrArm NwRW ro nR arv cc R.wao 0.GJIMG ml smaZ xmlwrr,un SIXTH STREET P6A~ "'"°°~` ~- _ NB9'H'S9'E - -- _ O N9950'iJ'E 1 '~ 1 ~ NB950YYE IBOSS' I ~ ~ OI ( XE9'HbOT IJUI' (151-b') W W NB950'P]'E IB9AJ' '~ m r m r rlu is snt ~ IM31' ~~ ~ n5 1AI1' W I g I%.SY RU94 NO RP. E. I VAGNCW CF .VP:NSIR A1EK¢ w ~ iW Mf. 1HI gAp1Ef L1M AIfMC' C@YIIID ILCIN n 2IAE OIY P'RA4OPo ~ d OKrRM'G RK 51Po1i. NdIWAY 27 AM FQAR4 RLdg4S 8 PARCEL 1 - s ' p I 1.097 ACRES JJ' N PARCEL 2 Lei 'i 1.207 ACRES ' SEE EASEMENT DETAIL r-___ mr'vw GS is sal,Z =____~~~___ u'1 as; m9.Ra 19x.1 95GO ~uM~N srerET ~i~T-yl ~--o ~t3bo I_uAfr:/V SI`NF_G~ ~.;C~1~~41 Z~- 5"EREET TREL'S 33. ) e• ~. 1''~ 1 N ' i LVA9IQ 4NM AIdL[ LWG/m l4{fW N ME O)Y 6RAWp O.LYWG me smar, rewwnr W ~~ An0 pM IED NLGPo4S N Q 3: 2 U 4- Map a1 PARCEL 3 0.771 ACRES ~~J-J~~ a ¢ Lit RCEL 4 0.495 ACRES NB910'tl'IY(R) 92 h i n } Roch Beier Q u.B. 9/20 sm59_m•Nl W .I _ _ _ ~ Y 7 W 11 /589_]Z]1_W(P2 ~ w F- Z _ 97 ~'' \ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~-3 P101 NOtRTH E P/~RCEL MAP (609 P102 Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2007/2008 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (LMD #3B) represents landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87 acres associated with the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the maintenance building). STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of--way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #~ is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit Che properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. B-1 PARCEL MAP 16009 P103 Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2007/2008) For Project: PARCEL MAP 16009 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800E 9500E 16,000E 22,000E 27,500E SLD # 1 -- 4 -- -- -- SLD # 6 4 -- -- -- -- Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees .andscaping DGSF SF SF EA LMD # 3B -- -- 25 *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel(s) Acres S 1 S 6 L 3B 1 1.097 2.194 1.097 1.097 2 1.207 2.414 1.207 1.207 3 0.771 1.542 0.771 0.771 4 0.495 0.99 0.495 0.495 B-2 PARCEL MAP 16009 P104 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2007/2008 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $352.80 for the fiscal year 2007/08. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial/Industrial): # of Assessment # of Rate Per Physical Physical Units Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Tvpe Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Comm/Ind Acre 2,775.62 I.0 2,775.62 $352.80 $979,238.73 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PARCEL MAP 16009) is: Parcel 1 1.097 Acres x I A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. ° $387.02 Annual Assessment Parcel 2 1.207 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. _ $428.83 Annual Assessment Parcel 3 0.771 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. _ $272.01 Annual Assessment Parcel 4 0.495 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. _ $174.64 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2007/08. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single parcel 23,640 1.00 23,640 $17.77 $420,082.80 Family Multi- Unit 11,154 1.00 11,154 $17.77 $198,206.58 Family Commercial Acre 2 985.85 2.00 5971.70 $17.77 $106,117.10 TOTAL $724,406.48 The Prop osed Annual Assessm ent against the Property (PARCEL MAP 16009) is: Parcel 1 1.097 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. _ $38.99 Annual Assessment Parcel 2 1.207 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. _ $42.90 Annual Assessment Parcel 3 0.771 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. _ $27.40 Annual Assessment Parcel 4 0.495 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. _ $17.59 Annual Assessment Gl PARCEL MAP 16009 P105 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $51.40 for the Fiscal Year 2007/08. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial): # of Assessment # of Rate Per Physical Physical Units Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Twe Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Comm/Ind Acre 2596.71 1.00 2596.71 $51.40 $133,470.89 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PARCEL MAP 16009) is: Parcel 1 1.097 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. _ $56.39 Annua] Assessment Parcel 2 1.207 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. _ $62.04 Annua] Assessment Parcel 3 0.771 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. _ $39.63 Annual Assessment Parcel 4 0.495 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. _ $25.44 Annual Assessment G2 PARCEL MAP 16009 STAFF REPORT ~C COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: September 19, 2007 RANCHO ~UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Kevin McArdle. Community Services Director By: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III Subject: APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT UPDATE In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of recreation programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent issues, projects and programs occurring in the Community Services Department. This report is provided to the City Council for informational purposes only. Seniors: The table below highlights some senior activities that took place during August 2007 as well as the total number of registrations for the year for Wellness Pass. Activit Date Partici ants Senior Bi Band Dance Au ust 11 100 Luau Au ust 23 250 Senior Birthda s Au ust 29 80 Wellness Pass - A es 60+ Total Re istered - 989 Wellness Pass - A es 50-59 Total Re istered - 433 Silver Fox Ex ress Total Re istered - 119 Uocoming senior activities are summarized below: Activit Date Time Senior Prom Se tember 16 5:00 .m. Senior Adviso Committee Meetin Se tember 24 9:00 a.m. Senior Birthda s Se tember 26 11:00 a.m. Oktoberfest October 19 6:00 .m. Halloween S ooktacular October 25 9:30 a.m. Human Services: The table below and on the following page summarizes participation in Human Services activities for the month of August 2007: Program Participants Blood Pressure Screenin 44 Resource Libra 99 Commodities 816 P106 P107 APPROVAL OF'Tf iF' COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT UPDATE PAGE 2 SEPTEMBER 19, 2007 Pro ram Partici ants Bereavement Su ort 5 Elder Law Private Counselin 5 HICAP 4 Dr. Cohen - "The Doctor is In" 8 Peo le with Arthritis can Exercise 451 Sit and Be Fit 268 Trips and Tours: The table below summarizes participation in trips and tours activities for the month of August 2007: Tri Date Number Partici ants "terse Bo s" Au ust 15 34 Catalina Au ust 22" 52 Las Ve as -Golden Nu et Au ust 26-28 29 • Upcoming trips and tours activities are summarized below: Tri Date Julian Se tember 21~ Lau hlin Se tember 23 Museum of Neon Art Se tember 28 "Thoroughly Modern Millie" @ The Lawrence Welk Resort and Theatre October 2" "Wicked" at the Panta es Theatre October 4 Griffith Observato October 10 Volunteers: The table below summarizes the Community Services Department's volunteer usaoe for the month of July 2007: Jul 2007 Division #of Volunteers #of Hours "$ Value Administration 5 15 $296 Senior Services 172 1,787 $35,266 Human Services 26 88 $1,727 S orts 169 2,412 $47,613 S ecial Events 66 418 $5,852 Performin Arts 63 450 $8,883 Teens 63 875 $17,277 Youth Pro rams 5 166 $3,281 Totals 569 6,211 $120,195 'Basetl on 519. ~Mrour- S1afe average as Oete-minetl the California Intlepentlem Secror. P108 APPROVAL OF TEIE CONIMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT UPDATE PAGE 3 SEPTEMBER 19, 2007 Special Needs Programs: • Upcoming special needs activities are summarized below: Activit Date/Time Friday Night Fun Club-Back to School Bash September 21~ / 4:00-5:30 p.m. IncreABLE Athletes -Basketball Se tember 25 / 4:30-6:00 .m. Adventures in Bowlin Se tember 27 /12:00-1:00 .m. Tech Junction: • The table below summarizes participation in Tech Junction activities for the month of August and early September 2007: Free Senior Com uter Classes Date Number of Partici ants Intro to Windrows & PC's Au ust 6-15 21 Intro to Word Processin Au ust 7-16 20 Com uter E-mail and E-cards Au ust 10-31 19 Intro to Internet E-mail Au ust 20-29 18 Intro to Microsoft Publisher Au ust 21-30 20 Intro to Windows & PC's Se tember 3-12 20 Intro to Microsoft Excel Se tember 413 13 Mana in Multimedia Se tember 17-26 15 Word Worksho Se tember 18-27 15 Into to Surfin the Internet Se tember 7-28 20 Contract Com uter Classes Date Number of Partici ants Microsoft Word & Power Point - $115.00 Se tember 11 7 Intro to T in - $115.00 Se tember 11 6 Into to Com uter & Internet - $115.00 Se tember 11 3 Intro to Microsoft Excel - $115.00 Se tember 11 6 General Public Free Use Date Number of Partici ants Dro in use Au ust 2007 512 Youth: • The table below summaries youth program attendance for the month of August Program Classes/Sites Registrants/Attendance Pla Cam 40/3 sites 953/8,320 Camp Cucamonga 3.5 weeks during 240/1,205 the month of Au ust/1 sites Kid Explorers 3.5 weeks during 111/222 the month of Au ust/2 sites Lewis Partnership Kids Club @ Evergreen BTerra Vista 2 sites 190 A artments • Mobile Recreation "Fun on the Run" -Total attendance for Mobile Recreation during the month of August was 402. This number includes both daily park visits and rental activities. The chart P109 APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT UPDATE PAGE 4 SEPTEMBER 19, 2007 below provides the schedule for Mobile Recreation for the fall season that will start up on September 17"'. Da of the Week Park Location Time Frame Monda Old Town 9:30-2:30 .m. Tuesda Hermosa 9:30-2:30 .m. Wednesda Bear Gulch 9:30-2:30 .m. Thursda Ellena 9:30-2:30 .m. Frida Herita a 9:30-2:30 .m. Teens: • The table below summarizes teen program attendance for the month of August 2007: Pro ram/Activit Attendance /Partici ation Teen Center 860 artici ants/162.5 hours Teen Recreation Activity Club (TRAC) Snack Bars 81 volunteers/342 hours of service TRAC - Babysitting 76 participants/11 volunteers/69.5 hours of service Teen Connection Volunteens 217volunteens/636 volunteer hours Teen Summer Cam in Tri 29 artici ants/78 hours Youth Sports: The table below summarizes youth sports activities for the reporting period: Activity # Participants Age/Gender # Teams Youth Basketball Clinic 27 6-13/bo s & iris N/A Youth Basketball 751 6-16/bo s & irls 89 Cucamon a Middle School -Judo 392 8-adult N/A Cucamonga Middle School -Sports Camp 455 5-12/bo s & irls N/A A uatics 1,770 All a es N/A A uatic Rentals Pool Parties 9 All a es N/A Northtown O en Pla 33 6-13/bo s & irls N/A Northtown Pee Wee Baseball 25 3-5/bo s & irls N/A Northtown Basketball 3-on-3 64 6-15/bo s & irls 14 Northtown Summer Cam 62 7-15/bo s & iris N/A Northtown Soccer 5 aside 33 6-14/bo s & irls 8 Hi Ho Dance Class 33 5-17/bo s & irls N/A Cheerleadin Class 6 5-17lbo s & irls N/A RC Family Sports Center: The table below and on the following page provides drop-in/open plat/ and rental participation at the Center for the reporting period: Activit #Partici ants Adult Basketball 109 Youth Basketball 675 P110 APPROVAL OF TIC COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT UPDATE PAGE 5 SEPTEMBER 19, 2007 Activit #Partici ants Adult Rac uetball 263 Youth Rac uetball 36 Adult Volle ball 6 Youth Volle ball 14 Adult Wall ball 3 Youth Wall ball 28 Jazzercise 900 S orts Cam 720 Rentals 440 Adult Sports: The table below summarizes adult sport activities for the reporting period: Activit #Partici ants # Team Gender Softball 2,720 170 Males/Females Adult Soccer 240 24 Male & Female Tennis 18 N/A Males/Females Rac uetball 12 N/A Males/Females There were four (4) adult softball tournaments during the month of August at the Epicenter and Adult Sports Park. Special Events: The Department's annual Concerts in the Park and Movies in Park programs ended in August with the following performances. Event Date Time Location Total Attendance Concerts in the Park August 2" 7:00 pm Red Hill Community 2,700 - "Doc Rocket & the Park -Amphitheatre Radio Fliers" oldies Concerts in the Park August 9 7:00 pm Red Hill Community 2,800 - "Soto" (Latin/Top Park -Amphitheatre 40's Concerts in the Park August 7:00 pm Red Hill Community 2,500 - "80'z All Stars" (80's 16`n Park Amphitheatre New Wave Movies in the Park- August 1~` Dusk Wednesday- 1,225 "Curious George' and 3rd Windrows Park (rated G) Friday-Red Hill Park Movies in the Park- August Dusk Monday-Central Park 1,315 "Monster House' (rated 6`" 7'n 9`n Tuesday -Victoria PG) & 10`n Gardens Wednesday - Windrows Park Friday- Red Hill Park P111 APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT UPDATE PAGE 6 SEPTEMBER 19, 2007 Event Date Time Location Total Attendance Movies in the Park - August Dusk Monday -Central Park 1,200 "Open Season" (PG) 13` , 14"', Tuesday -Victoria 15"'and Gardens 17~' Wednesday - Windrows Park Frida -Red Hill Park • Upcoming special events are noted below: Event Date/Time Location Park Opening -fun activities September 15 /10-2:00 p.m. Rancho Summit Park - 5958 for children and their families Soldad Way and a groundbreaking ceremon . Founders Festival - "A Circus November 10 /9:30 am Victoria Gardens Regional Celebration" including our Town Center & the Bank of annual parade and awards America Imagination Courtyard ceremon, celebration of the ' at the Cultural Center s 30 birthday and family City entertainment. Cultural and Performing Arts: The table below summarizes Theatre Arts Academy classes during the reporting period: Activit Partici ants/Attendance Adult Im rov Worksho 25 Adult Chorale Trou e 75 Teen Actors Boot Cam 87 Advance Performance Trou e 5 Youth Theatre Worksho a es 7-11 93 Youth Theatre Worksho a es 12-15 44 Musical Theatre 63 Be innin Actin 68 Sin in for a Lifetime 33 Broadwa Babies 89 Total 582 Cultural Center Rental Activities: • The table below and on the following page summarizes rental activities in Celebration Hall at the Cultural Center for the reporting period: Date A licant/Event Attendance Au ust 4 C. Miles - 40 Birthda Part 78 Au ust 8 Communit Church - Devore -Meetin 126 Au ust 8 Matrix Escrow -Meetin 23 Au ust 10` Pavia -Weddin Setu 3 Au ust 10 Pavia -Weddin Rece tion 330 Au ust 25 J. Lozano -Celebration 120 P112 APPROVAL OF Tf-IE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT UPDATE PAGE 7 SEPTEMBER 19, 2007 Date A licant/Event Attendance Au ust 29`h San Bernardino County Sheriff's Dept - Setu for Seminar 12 Au ust 30"' San Bernardino County Sheriff's Dept.- Seminar 463 Au ust 31~` San Bernardino County Sheriff's Dept. - Seminar 324 TOTAL '1,479 Lewis Family Playhouse: During the reporting period, the Lewis Family Playhouse was host to a wide variety of productions, community programs and private rentals. The table below summarizes this information for the reporting period: Lewis Famil Pla house Communit Theatre Productions Event Date Attendance Number of Events The Wizard of Oz Au ust 3-4, 2007 1,479 2 Lewis Famil Pla house Rental Events Event Date Attendance Number of Events Fli side -Rancho Cucamon a Rumble Au ust 17-18, 2007 636 2 Gos el Visions -Clean Comed Live Au ust 11, 2007 352 1 San Bernardino Count Sheriff's De artment - /Seminar Au ust 30-31, 2007 787 2 Cultural Center Public Lobby: The Lobby to the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center is open to the public seven days a week. During the month of August, 1,386 community members visited the public areas. Recreation Classes: The fall 2007 Grapevine was mailed out the week of August 6~' and registration began on August 20~' with classes starting on September 8'~ and ending on November 30`h. Facilities: The table below illustrates the number of rentals/bookings and attendance figures for our community facilities during the month of August. Facility Rentals # Rentals/Bookings Rental Attendance Building Attendance Lions Center East 14/68 1,675 3,569 Lions Center West 40/141 3,800 3,401 James L. Brulte Senior Center 72/218 7,891 19,876 Gold S. Lewis Communit Center 95/205 10,164 8,343 • Staff continues to meet quarterly with users of the Equestrian Center (Alta Loma Riding Club, Rancho Rebels 4-H, Rising Stars of Equestrian Therapy and Rancho Cucamonga Citizen Mounted Patrol.) to address maintenance needs and programming. P113 APPROVAL OF TIC. OONIMUI`IITY SERVICES DEPAR"I'MENT UPDATE PAGE 8 SEPTEMBER 19, 2007 Parks: The table below provides usage information for park picnic shelters and special use facilities for the month of August 2007: Park/Shelter Attendance/Partici ants # Rentals Red Hill 2,552 47 Herita a 1,100 21 Milliken 609 18 Hermosa 360 14 Co ote Can on 253 11 Civic Center Court and 0 0 Am hitheatre 150 3 TOTAL 5,024 114 Equestrian Rentals/Drop-in Use Participants: 180 S ectators: 0 16 Park monitors keep daily reports of activities in our parks, often helping out residents in need of assistance. Epicenter Rentals/Activities: The following rental activities took place at the Epicenter during the reporting period: A licant Event Location Date Mark Christopher Auto New Car Sale Special Event Lot August 15-20, 2007 Center Pacific Coast Baseball Championship Games Epicenter Stadium August 26, 2007 Lea ue • Staff is working with the following applicants for upcoming rentals and activities at the Epicenter: A licant Event Location Pro osed Date Lymphoma & Light the Night Walk Epicenter - Parking September 29, 2007 Leukemia Societ Lot B Preferred Businesses Home & Garden Show Special Event Lot October 1-8, 2007 of America Active Ride Bling Fest 2007 Special Event Lot November 17 8 18, 2007 Park and Recreation Commission: The Park and Recreation Commission's next meeting is scheduled for September 20, 2007. At this meeting the items are agenized for discussion: - Senior Advisory Committee Update. - Sports Advisory Committee Update. - Annual review of Recreation Needs and Systems Recommendations Study relating to recreation activities, programs and services. - Update on the Founder's Festival and Community Parade. - Quarterly Superintendents' update on Departmental programming. - Presentation on the Northtown Partnership. P114 APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT UPDATE PAGE 9 SEPTEMBER 19, 2007 ' - Consideration of a name for South Etiwanda Park. Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation: The Community Foundation continues to work with the Library Foundation on the Promoting Arts and Literacy (PAL) Campaign to secure significant donors for the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center. The Community Foundation Executive Committee met on September 12, 2007. At this meeting the following items were agenized for discussion/action: - Progress review of the Community Foundation's 2007 Work Plan. - Update on selection process for a consultant to work with the Community and Library Foundations for their strategic planning. - Brainstorming of potential topics for the Finance, Fund Development and Membership/Nominating Committee meetings. - Review of the meeting schedule for the Community Foundation's Executive Committee meetings. The next full Board Meeting of the Community Foundation is scheduled for Wednesday, October 10, 2007 at the Civic Center. The following agenda items are anticipated for this meeting: - Status review of the Community Foundation's 2007 Work Plan. - Discussion regarding the Foundation philosophy of either giving or raising a minimum of $10,000 per year. - Discussion regarding the development of a vision statement for the role of the Community Foundation over the next five years. - Committee updates (Executive Committee, Finance Committee, Fund Development Committee, Membership/Nominating Committee, PAL House Raffle Committee, and the Gala Committee). - Review of Committees meeting schedules for the next six months. - Review and Discussion of recommendation from the PAL Campaign Cabinet regarding the selection of a consultant to work with both the Community and Library Foundations in their strategic planning process. - Update on the status of the PAL fundraising efforts. - Brainstorming on means to identify potential new PAL Spotlight donors and/or approaching current Spotlight donors to increase their support. - Discussion of ways to reach out to the Playhouse volunteers to involve them in fundraising opportunities for the Cultural Center. Respectfully submitted, Kevin McArdle Community Services Director I:ICOMMSERVICouncilBBoardslCityCouncillStaflReports120071CSD. Update.9.19.07.doc P115 APPROVAL OF TI-IE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT UPDATE PACE 9 SEPTEMBER 19, 2007 - Consideration of a name for South Etiwanda Park. Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation: • The Community Foundation continues to work with the Library Foundation on the Promoting Arts and Literacv (PAL) Campaign to secure significant donors for the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center. • The Community Foundation Executive Committee met on September 12, 2007. At this meeting the following items were agenized for discussion/action: - Progress review of the Community Foundation's 2007 Work Plan. - Update on selection process for a consultant to work with the Community and Library Foundations for their strategic planning. - Brainstorming of potential topics for the Finance, Fund Development and Membership/Nominating Committee meetings. - Review of the meeting schedule for the Community Foundation's Executive Committee meetings. The next full Board Meeting of the. Community Foundation is scheduled for Wednesday, October 10, 2007 at the Civic Center. The following agenda items are anticipated for this meeting: - Status review of the Community Foundation's 2007 Work Plan. - Discussion regarding the Foundation philosophy of either giving or raising a minimum of $10,000 per year. - Discussion regarding the development of a vision statement for the role of the Community Foundation over the next five years. - Committee updates (Executive Committee, Finance Committee, Fund Development Committee, Membership/Nominating Committee, PAL House Raffle Committee, and the Gala Committee). - Review of Committees meeting schedules for the next six months. - Review and Discussion of recommendation from the PAL Campaign Cabinet regarding the selection of a consultant to work with both the Community and Library Foundations in their strategic planning process. - Update on the status of the PAL fundraising efforts. - Brainstorming on means to identify potential new PAL Spotlight donors and/or approaching current Spotlight donors to increase their support. - Discussion of ways to reach out to the Playhouse volunteers to involve them in fundraising opDOrtunities for the Cultural Center. Services Director I:ICOMMSERVICouncil&BoardslCityCouncillStaHReports120071CSD. Update.9.19.07.doc STAFF REPORT ADMINISTR~.TIVE SERVICES DEP~IRT2`4ENT Date: September 19, 2007 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, City Manager From: John R. Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Subject: APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 08-238(6), INCLUDING NEW POSITION CLASSIFICATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007-08 BUDGET. P116 RANCHO CUCAMONGA Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council approve Resolution No. 06-238(6) to include new position classifications that replace and/or supersede existing approved positions in the fiscal year 2007-08 budget. The changes are to titles and classifications and will not increase existing personnel. pectfully Submitte n R. Gillison Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Attachment Staff report amend reso 06-209 and 06-238.doc P117 RESOLUTION NO. 06-238(6) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO INCLUDE NEW POSITION CLASSIFICATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007-2008 BUDGET WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that it is necessary for the efficient operation and management of the City that policies be established prescribing salary ranges, benefits, and holidays and other policies for employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted a salary resolution in Resolution No. 06-238, that established salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment for employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that it is necessary from time to time to amend the salary resolution to accommodate changes in position titles, classifications salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California as follows: SECTION 1: SALARY RANGES Salary Ranges Effective July 2007 (As Amended September 19, 2007) ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES Minimum Control Point Maximum Class Title 'Ste Amount Ste ~ ~ Amount ate ; Amount Account Clerk 4375 2.767 4415= 3,378 4425'' 3,551 Account Technician '4416 3,395 4456' 4,145 :4466:' 4,357 Accountant# 3462'i 4,268 3502:. 5,210 -3512 5,477 Accountin Mana er* 2522; 5,757 .2562'` 7,028 2572 7,388 Administrative Secrets ' `4418=' 3,429 .:4458`= 4,187 4468 4,401 Administrative Technician ?4430 3,641 4470- 4,445 :4480: 4,672 Animal Care Attendant 4341 - 2,336 4381rt 2,851 4391- 2,997 Animal Caretaker 4376'' 2,781 '44,1.6;-: 3,395 4426- 3,569 Animal Center Mana er* 2508' 5,316 ~: '.2546x' 6,489 2556 6,821 Animal Handler 4386;': 2,923 `4426' 3 569 '4436' 3,751 Animal Services Dis atcher 4361°. 2,581 X4401_' 3 151 X4411 3,312 Animal Services Officer "4441 ' 3,846 4481 ' 4 695 ;4491 - 4,936 Assistant Cit Clerk # 3480'; 4,669 3520 5,700 3530 5,991 Resolution No. 06-238(6) Page 2 of 11 Assistant Cit En ineer* -259,0 8,082 2630 9,866. ,2640 10,371 Assistant Electrician ..543© 3,638 54f7a0 4,441 54$0 4,668 Assistant En ineer# "3484 4,763 3524 5,815 353_4 6,112 Assistant Libra Director* 2517Y2 7,388- 2612 9,019 2622 9,480 Assistant Planner# 3468 4,398 3508 5,369 3518 5,643 Assistant Plannin Director* 2583 7,805 2623 9,528 26:33 10,015 Assistant to the Cit Mana er* 2548 6,554 25$8. 8,002 25.9,8 8,411 Associate En ineer# x.3,5;14 5,532 ,3.55_4 6,753 35.64, 7,099 Associate Planner# ~~3 87,E 4,835 352x7 5,902 3.537 6,204 Benefits Technician ~:4~~~39,1 2,997 ,;4431. 3,659 4441 3,846 Box Office Coordinator `F4449'i 4,003 ~y448 :~ 4,887 u4499.x 5,136 Bud et Anal st# ~<'3491,~' 4 932 3531: 6,021 '~35 1 6,329 Buildin Ins ection Su ervisor#z ~ 3 97 5 082 .u3537 6,204 43~7~" 6,521 Buildin Ins ector~ ti~[~'h~~{~M1:W:r3 >4457 4,166 4497_ 5,086 '.4'507`. 5,346 Business License Clerk 4378 2,809 441,8. 3,429 4.4.3.8. 3,605 Business License Ins ector 441;8 3,429 4,.,45;8 4,187 44.6.8; 4,401 Business License Pro ram Coordinator# 3„4.32 3,675 ~,34P7r2 4,486 :3_482 4,716 Business License Technician 94Q8 3,263 444:8 3,983 4458 4,187 Bu er# 3433 3,693 3473 4,509 '.;3483 4,739 Code Enforcement Officer '.4.,4,4x1 3,846 44:81 4,695 4499 4,936 Code Enforcement Su ervisor#Z 34$A 4,692 ~ 3521? 5,728 ~ 3531 6.021 Communit Pro rams Coordinator ,=;4449 4,003 4„489 4,887 44;99 5,136 Communit Pro rams S ecialist 4_4.30 3,641 4470 4,445 448Q 4,672 Communit Services Coordinator Y 4449 4,003 .4489. 4,887 449,9 5,136 Communit Services Marketin Coord 4_449. 4,003 448.9 4,887 4499 5,136 Communit Services Su erintendent* ~2535~; 6,143 ~~2 7,499 ,.2585 7,883 Communit Services Su ervisor# ~3479"~ 4,646 ~3519h 5,671 =`3~ 9'`~ 5,962 Communit Services Technician '4430;x! 3,641 `4470', 4 445 `4u 4,672 Communit Svc Marketin Mana er* -'2535 „' 6,143 `2575x? 7,499 r=2585~ 7,883 De ut Cit Clerk# '~3430T" 3,63$ 347~0~ 4,442 .3480°~ 4,669 Economic Develo ment Mana er* 253x73 6,205 ~,±'~25,7;?7 7,574 ;"2587. 7,962 Electrician ~i545r7 4,162 `„5497° 5,081 X5507 5,341 En ineerin Aide _442x1 3,481 446;1_ 4,250 4„47~1~_ 4,467 En ineerin Technician 4441 3,846 44:81 4,695 4991 4,936 Environmental Pro rams Ins ectorz 44,56 4,145 44,96 5,060 ,4506 5,319 Environmental Pro rams Mana er* 253,9 6,267 25T7g9 7,650 .2589 8,042 E ui ment O eratorz a 54~1T7 3,410 ..54;57 4,162 _,546.7 4,375 P118 Resolution No. 06-238(6) Page 3 of 11 ExecutiveAssistant* .2454 4,101 2_4,9_4 5,007 250_4 5,263 Facilities Su erintendent' 2536 6,174 25I7j6 7,537 2586 7,922 Fleet Su ervisor#2 3_4:8.0 4,669 3520 5,700 3530 5,991 GISAnaI st 4_456 4,145 4_4,9_6 5,060 4.546 5,319 GIS Technician 4436 3,751 4476 4,580 4486 4,814 GIS/S ecial District Mana er' 2.5.38 6,236 25178 7,612 2588 8,002 Housin Pro'ects Mana er' 2537 6,205 2577 7.574 25817 7,962 Human Resources Officer' 2584 7,844 2624 9,575 2634 10,065 Information Services Anal st I# 35Q5 5,289 35_4_5 6,457 35°55 6,787 Information Services Anal st II# 3520 5,700 3-_560 6,958 35170 7,314 Information Services Mana er* 25_84 7,844 2624 9,575 .2634. 10,065 Information Services Pro'ects Coord.# 3501 5,185 3_541 6,329 3551 6,653 Information Services S ecialist I 44'56 4,145 4496 5,060 4.5•_06 5,319 Information Services S ecialist II 4471 4,467 4511 5,453 452;1 5,732 Invento S ecialist E ui ment/MatZ 5387 2,936 5i~7 3,584 543x7 3,767 Junior Bu er 4411 3,312 4451 4,043 4461 4,250 Lead Maintenance Workerz .542x7 3,584 X54677 4,375 .5477 4,599 Lead Mechanic ~~5440 , 3,824 ;:5'480 4,668 5„490 4,907 Librarian I# "3435. 3,730 (`34175 4,554 3485 4,787 Librarian II# A,c7t' 4,163 %3497 5,082 35017 5,342 Libra Assistant I# `3369 ~ 2,684 3409 3,277 3,419 3,444 Libra Assistant II# W3410 3,293 345© 4,020 3460 4,226 Libra Clerk 4352 2,467 4392 3,012 4402 3,166 Libra Pa e 4237 1,390 42877 1,697 42817 1,784 Libra Pa a II 4266 1,775 4326 2,167 4.336 2,278 Libra Services Mana er' 2506 5,316 .2546 6,489 2556,E 6,821 Maintenance Coordinator 5_4_44 3,901 5484 4,762 5_49_'4 5,006 Maintenance Su ervisor#2 3480 4,669 3520 5,700 3530 5,991 Maintenance Workerz .5389... 2,965 5429 3,620 5439. 3,805 Mana ement Aide 4_4:32 3,677 4_4p7,r2 4,489 4482 4,719 Mana ement Anal st I# X34,62 _ 4,268 3502 5,210 35112 5,477 Mana ement Anal st II# '..349x1 4,932 3531. 6.021 3541 6,329 Mana ementAnal stlll# _3508 5,369 3548f 6,554 3558. 6,889 Mechanic2 '8,4.30 ,', 3,638 ^x5470 4.441 '..548.0 4,668 Office Services Clerk ~436~1 2,581 4401 3,151 ~44,1~1,;~ 3,312 Office S ecialist I c~4341. 2,336 y_4381, 2,851 ~439z1~ 2.997 Office S ecialist II ,.:,,436x1_ 2,581 ~4 3,151 ~x44~1r1T 3.312 P119 P120 Resolution No. 06-238(6) Page 4 of 11 Park/Landsca a Maintenance Su t*2 _2536 6.174 25I7i6 7,537 2586 7,922 Personnel Clerk 43811 2,851 4_421 3,481 4_4.3x1 3,659 Personnel Services Coordinator# 34,63 4,289 35'03 5,236 351x3 5,504 Plan Check & Ins ection Mana er* 2532 6,052 .25172 7,388 2582 7,766 Plannin Commission Secreta $ •,3438 3,787 3478 , 4,623 3488 4,859 Plannin S ecialist =x.444:3 3,885 ,Q44:83. 4,743 4493 4,985 Plannin Technician 4,423 3,516 4463. 4,292 ~„44z7,r3 4,512 Plans Examiner# 34;81 4,692 3521 5,728 3_5:31 6,021. Princi al Librarian* 249,5: 5,032 .25.35. 6,143 2545:. 6,457 Princi al Mana ement Anal st* 2.5_36 6,174 25=76 7,537 2586 7,922 Princi al Planner* ;~`2>~'j~'~ 6,205 ;`25717,x? 7,574 2587 7,962 Public Services Technician I 4405 3,214 444'S.~ 3,924 ~ 4455 4,124 Public Services Technician II 441;5 3,378 4455 4,124 4465 4,335 Public Services Technician III ,4435 3,733 44~7_a5 4,557 44'85. 4,790 Public Works Ins ector IZ 4436 3,751 4„4g7.~6 4,580 .44$6 4,814 Public Works Ins ector IIZ 4456 ~ 4,145 449,6 5,060 4506 5,319 Public Works Maintenance Mana er* .25_68_ 7,170 2606 8,753 26~1a6 9,201 Public Works Safet & Invento Coord#Z 34<68 4,398 35Q8 5,369 35~a18 5,643 Purchasin Clerk 4;3!74 2,754 .441._4 3,362 4424 3,534 Purchasin Mana er* 2530. 5,992 25t7k0 7,315 2580 7,689 Records Clerk ~,4350,~ 2,443 4390 2,982 44Q0 3,135 Records Coordinator ~4378~ 2,809 ;,441$ 3,429 4.4,28 3,605 Redevelo ment Anal st I # x3468;_:. 4,398 3508.., 5,369 351;8 5,643 Redevelo ment Anal st II # `3487: 4,835 352;7,;; 5,902 33537,E 6,204 Risk Mana ement Coordinator# ~3 6 ~; 4,268 r~,3502~a 5,210 ~%351>2~ 5,477 Secreta ' "4388:; r;. 2,953 X44.28 3,605 4438'sa 3,789 Senior Account Clerk 439 ~ 3,058 ~,4435~ 3.733 X4.445 3,924 Senior Account Technician (:.4,4=3,9 3,808 4¢Z9, 4,649 ,; ...4489. 4,887 SeniorAccountant# 3491 ' 4,932 3531 6,021 3_541 6,329 Senior Administrative Secreta ' ,~44:38 3,789 4478; 4,626 4488, 4,862 Senior Animal Services Officer# ~3461:~, 4,247 350x1 5,185 X35'11 5,450 Senior Buildin Ins ector#2 .3.4t7~r7~, 4,600 351,7 , 5,615 352x7 5.902 Senior Bu er# ~3,„4,6,3 ;, 4,289 3,5:03 5,236 3511,3.. 5,504 Senior Civil En ineer* ~254t7 6,522 #258;7gx 7,962 .25917,,. 8,369 Senior Code Enforcement Officer# 346x1°. ~ 4,247 350x1 5,185 35~1~1 . 5,450 Senior Electrician # ;-3485 4,787 ;~3525.u 5,844 _353:5x' 6,143 Senior GIS Anal st# 3484_y 4,763 3,524 5,815 3534a 6,112 Resolution No. 06-238(8) Page 5 of 11 Senior Information Services Anal st# 3535 6,143 35u5 7,499 358_5 7,882 Senior Information Services S ecialist 4493 4,985 4533 6,086 4543 6,397 Senior Librarian# 3468 4,398 3_508 5,369 3_518 5,643 Senior Maintenance Worked 5339 3,117 5439 3,805 5449 4,000 Senior Park Planner# 3_496 5,057 3536 6,173 3546 6,489 Senior Planner* 2517 5,615 25;517 6,855 2567 7,206 Senior Plans Examiner# .3496 5,057 3.536 6,173 35_46 6,489 Senior S ecial Districts Technician 4_4:36 3,751 4~6 4,580 4_4:8_6 4,814 Si nal & Li htin Coordinatorz 5471 4,463 5511 5,449 5521 5;728 Si nal & Li htin Technician 5444 3,901 5484 4,762 5494 5,006 S ecial Districts Anal st# 3_491 4,932 ,3531 6,021 3541 6,329 S ecial Districts Technician 4430 3,641 44+70 4,445 448_0 4,672 StreeUStorm Drain Maintenance Su t*z ...2536 6,174 .25t7t6 7,537 25;86 7,922 Su ervisin Public Works Ins ector#z 3.486,_ 4,811 ~3526e~ 5,873 X3536 6,173 Technical Production Coordinator s4'~4 9 4 207 `4499 5,136 4509. 5,399 Theatre Technician III x.4423 ~ 3,516 X44:63 4.292 49f73. 4,512 Traffic En ineer* 2561 6,993 2601 8,538 26.11 8,974 Utilit O erations Mana er* 25:24 5,815 2564 7,099 25174. 7,462 Veterina Assistant 4400 3,135 444.0 3,827 4450 4,023 Veterina Technician 44:30 3,641 44i7~0 4,445 4480 4,672 Minimum Control Point Maximum Part Time Positions Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Account Clerk 6368 15.42 6408 18.81 6418 19.77 Administrative Intern x"6320 12.12 6360 14.80 fi370 15.56 Assistant Pool Manager 630`5 11.26 fi34'S- 13.75 ~~6~355 14.44 Box Office Assistant v r9 10.45 ~633'0~ 12.75 a63'40 13.41 Box Office'Specialist fi311 11.60 6351 14.16 fi361 14.88 Business License Clerk fi378 16.21 `64,1!8 19.78 6428 20.80 Environmental Resources Intern X6280 9.93 632 12.12 6330 12.75 Instructor/Guard I 62a40 8.14 6280 9.93 X6290 10.45 Instructor/Guard II 6280 9.93 6320 12.12 6330 12.75 Library Aide 6231 7.78 6271 9.50 628'1 9.98 Librarian I 6433 21.31 6473 26.01 64'83 27.34 Library Assistant I 6262 14.96 6'402 18.26 6'412 19.19 Library Assistant II 6`4'04 18.44 ,6444 22.52 6'4'5'4 23.66 Library Clerk `63'46 ~ 13.81 6386 16.86 6396 17.72 Library Page 6231 7.78 6271 9.50 6281 9.98 Library Page II ~6280~ 9.93 6320 12.12 ~fi33 12.75 P121 Resolution No. 06-238(6) Page 6 of 11 Maintenance Technician 6280 9.93 6320. 12.12 6330 12.75 Office Specialist I 6332 12.86 6372 15.72 .6382 16.52 Office Specialist II 6352 14.22 6392 17.37 6402 18.25 Planning Aide 6320 12.12 6360 14.80 -6370 15.56 Pool Manager 6329 12.69 6369 15.49 6379 16.27 Program Specialist 6311 11.60 6351 14.16 6361 14.88 Purchasing Clerk 6368 15.41 6408 18.81 6418 19.78 Receptionist 6342' 13.53 6382 16.52 6392 17.37 Records Clerk 6344 - 13.67 6384` 16.69 6394 17.55 Records Coordinator `.6372 ! 15.72 6412 i 19.19 6422 20.17 Recreation Attendant '6237 8.01 6277 9.80 6287- 10.28 Recreation Assistant 6266:- 9.26 6306 11.31 6316- 11.90 Recreation Leader 6290 10.45 6330+ 12.75 6340` 13.41 Senior Civil Engineer 6543 36.88 6583 45.02 6593 47.33 Theatre Technician I 6311 ' 11.60 6351- 14.16 6361 14.88 Theatre Technician II 6372 15.72 6412 19.19 6422 20.17 Veterinary Assistant 6400 18.08 6440 22.07 6450 23.19 When acting as Clerk to Commissions $50 paid per night or weekend day meeting. Compensatory time off can be substituted in lieu of $50 at the option of the employee. z. Up to $200 provided annually toward purchase of approved safety footwear from a city designated vendor. $ Denotes $50.00 paid per night or weekend day meeting; discontinues when this position is vacated as long as this position is classified "Supervisory/Professional" # Denotes Supervisory/Professional Class * Denotes Management Class SECTION 2: SALARY STRUCTURE As per Resolutions No. 06-209 and 06-238 for Executive Management and General Employees, as adopted and/or subsequently amended, respectively. SECTION 3: SALARY SURVEY The City shall conduct a salary survey of labor market cities approximately six months before the start of new labor negotiations for the next MOU. SECTION 4: MULTI-TIERED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM P122 As per Resolutions No. 06-209 and 06-238 for Executive Management and General Employees, as adopted and/or subsequently amended, respectively. Resolution No. 06-238(6) Page 7 of 11 SECTION 5: LIFE INSURANCE As per Resolutions No. 06-209A, and 06-238 for Executive Management and General Employees, as adopted and/or subsequently amended, respectively. SECTION 6: HEALTH INSURANCE As per Resolutions No. 06-209A, and 06-238 for Executive Management and General Employees, as adopted and/or subsequently amended, respectively. SECTION 7: RETIREE MEDICAL As per Resolutions No. 06-209 and 06-238 for Executive Management and General Employees, as adopted and/or subsequently amended, respectively. SECTION 8: DENTAL INSURANCE The City shall provide a dental insurance plan for all full-time continuous salaried employees and elected officials. The City agrees to average the cost of dental insurance for all full time continuous salaried employees and elected officials through June 30, 2009. SECTION 9: OPTICAL INSURANCE The City shall provide an optical insurance plan for all full-time continuous salaried employees and elected officials. The City agrees to average the cost of optical insurance for all full time continuous salaried employees and elected officials through June 30, 2009. SECTION 10: PREMIUM ONLY PLAN UNDER SECTION 125 As per Resolutions No. 06-209 and 06-238 for Executive Management and General Employees, as adopted and/or subsequently amended, respectively. SECTION 11: RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNT As per Resolutions No. 06-209 and 06-238 for Executive Management and General Employees, as adopted and/or subsequently amended, respectively. SECTION 12: BEREAVEMENT LEAVE P123 As per Resolutions No. 06-209 and 06-238 for Executive Management and General Employees, as adopted and/or subsequently amended, respectively. Resolution No. 06-238(6) Page 8 of 11 SECTION 13: PERSONAL LEAVE As per Resolutions No. 06-209 and 06-238 for Executive Management and General Employees, as adopted andlor subsequently amended, respectively. SECTION 14: VACATION As per Resolutions No. 06-209 and 06-238 for Executive Management and General Employees, as adopted and/or subsequently amended, respectively. SECTION 15: VACATION BUYBACK As per Resolutions No. 06-209 and 06-238 for Executive Management and General Employees, as adopted and/or subsequently amended, respectively. SECTION 76: SICK LEAVE All full-time employees shall, with continuous service, accrue 120 hours of sick leave annually. Sick leave can be taken after six months service. SECTION 17: SICK LEAVE BUYBACK Employees who terminate their city employment after 5 years of continuous service and have at least 50% of give years sick leave accrued on the books upon termination can sell 120 hours back to the City. SECTION 18: HOLIDAYS As per Resolutions No. 06-209 and 06-238 for Executive Management and General Employees, as adopted and/or subsequently amended, respectively. SECTION 79: HOLIDAY TIME As per Resolution No. 06-238. SECTION 20: PREMIUM HOLIDAY COMPENSATION As per Resolution No. 06-238. SECTION 21: NATAL AND ADOPTION LEAVE WITHOUT PAY Employees are granted up to four months natal and adoption leave for the birth or adoption of a child. Employees on this leave of absence without pay will be responsible for the payment of medical, dental and optical premiums to keep the coverage in force during the leave of absence. P124 Resolution No. 06-238(6) Page 9 of 11 SECTION 22: NATAL AND ADOPTION LEAVE WITH PAY Employees are granted up to 2 days natal and adoption leave with pay for the birth or adoption of a child. Any paid time required beyond this initial 2 days must be charged to sick leave, vacation, compensatory or floating holiday time. SECTION 23: WORKERS COMPENSATION LEAVE As per Resolutions No. 06-209 and 06-238 for and General Employees, as adopted and/or respectively. SECTION 40: MILITARY LEAVE Executive Management subsequently amended, Employees required to serve military leave will be compensated pursuant to the Military and Veterans Code. To qualify for compensation the military orders must be submitted to the supervisor prior to their tour of duty and must be attached to the timecard for that pay period. SECTION 25: MILITARY SERVICE BUY BACK Employees have the option for military service buy back at the employee's expense. SECTION 26: OVERTIME -MAINTENANCE As per Resolution No. 06-238. SECTION 27: STANDBY PAY As per Resolution No. 06-238. SECTION 28: SAFETY FOOTWEAR As per Resolution No. 06-238. SECTION 29: Retirement Benefit The City agrees to provide the employees' contribution for CaIPERS 2.5% 55 retirement formula and the supplemental Retirement Enhancement Plan benefit through PARS Phase II Retirement System. SECTION 30: TUITION REIMBURSEMENT As per Resolutions No. 06-209 and 06-238 for Executive Management and General Employees, as adopted and/or subsequently amended, respectively. SECTION 31: 4/10 WORK WEEK P125 The City will operate on a 4/10 work week, with business hours from 7:00 am to 6:00 pm, Monday through Thursday. Resolution No. 06-238(6) Page 10 of 11 SECTION 32: CARPOOL PROGRAM As per Resolution No. 06-238. SECTION 33: BI-LINGUAL PAY Employees who qualify for bi-lingual pay will be provided at $50.00 per month. SECTION 34: PARITY PROVISION As per Resolution No. 06-238. SECTION 35: CITY COUNCIL A. CaIPERS and PARS Supplemental Retirement Plan -The Mayor and City Council members have the option to enroll in the California Public Employees Retirement System and PARS Supplemental Retirement Plan. B. Health -City council members are eligible to participate in the City's health benefits as provided to Executive Management. SECTION 36: CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES Confidential employees are designated as such when an employee in the course of his or her duties, has access to information relating to the City's administration of employer-employee relations. Employees designated as confidential employees may not act as representatives of employee organizations which represent other employees of the City. The employees designated as confidential employees are as follows: Personnel Services Coordinator Personnel Clerk Benefits Technician Account Technician -Payroll Office Specialist II -Admin. Services Secretary Planning Commission Secretary SECTION 37: EFFECTIVE DATE Administrative Secretary Senior Administrative Secretary Risk Management Coordinator Deputy City Clerk Records Clerk Records Coordinator Executive Assistant P126 The provisions of this resolution are effective September 19, zoos. P127 Resolution No. 06-238(6) Page 11 of 11 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19`h day of September 2007. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald Kurth, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, GMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the 19"' day of September 2007. Executed this 19`" day of September 2007, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk STAFF REPORT LK~GIK~EERING J]HP.-1 R'I'~IENT Date: To: From: By: Subject September 19, 2007 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP,'City Manager RANCHO CUCAMONGA William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engine _.. ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $382,357.71 TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, AMERICAN ASPHALT SOUTH, INC., AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $38,235.77, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2007/2008 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - SLURRY SEAL OF VARIOUS STREETS, TO BE FUNDED FROM MEASURE I FUND, ACCOUNT NO. 11763035650/1022176 AND TRAFFIC CONGESTION FUND, ACCOUNT NO. 11903035650/1022190 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $382,357.71 to the apparent low bidder, American Asphalt South, Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $38,235.77, for the Fiscal Year 2007/2008 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation -Slurry Seal of Various Streets, to be funded from Measure I Fund, Account No. 1 1 76 3 035650/1 0221 76 and Traffic Congestion Fund, Account No. 1 1 90303 5650/1 0221 90. BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on September 4, 2007, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate for the base bid was $379,858.64. Additive bid items "1 through 6" will not be awarded. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds the apparent low bidder meets the requirements of the bid documents. The scope of work consists of crack sealing, slurry sealing, protection and/or adjustment of valve covers, protection of existing survey monuments and manholes, pneumatic rolling, restriping and pavement markings. The contract documents call for forty (40) working days to complete this construction. _ 1,' Respectfully su i ~d, ~ '~ / ~~r. William J. O'Neil City Engineer P128 WJO:CHISHis Attachments P129~ B1D SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING SEPTEMBER 4, 2007 APPARENT LOW BIDDER FY 07/08 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHAB SLURRY SEAL VARIOUS STREETS ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE American Asphalt South, Ine. Pavement Coatin s Co. NO QTY VNIT DE6CRIPTION COST AMOVNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 1 249.907 SY BaSe Bitl MaO A'l S1.52 S379,858.64 SL53I $382,357.71 S1.72 $429,840.04 BASE BID TOTAL 5379,858.64 $382,357.73 5429,840.04 1 12,381 SY MapK $1.521 $18,819.12 $1.531 $18,942.93 $1.831 $22,657.23 2 18,917 SY MapL S1.52 528,753.84 51.531 528,943.01 81.661 531,402.22 3 20,969 SY MapM $1.521 $31,872.88 $1.531 532,082.57 52.041 $42,77fi.76 4 34,406 SV MapN 51.521 552,297.12 SL53I 552,641.18 S1.78 1 S61,242.68 5 12,409 SY M2P0 $1.521 $18,861.68 $1.531 $18,985.77 $1.84 1 $22,832.56 6 11,906 SV MapP 53.521 $18,097.12 $1.53 1 518,216.18 51.76 1 520,954.56 TOTAL 5548,560.40 5552,169.35 5631,706.05 Pa or 7 P130 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FY 2007/08 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM .~''~ ;~ N ,~; N.T.S. P131 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Date: September 19, 2007 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. ONeil, City Engineer By: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT AMENDMENT (CONTRACT CO 03-090) ADNSTING THE HOURLY RATE FOR INSPECTION SERVICES PROVIDED BY ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, INC. It is recommended that the City Council, by minute action, authorize the inspection hourly rate be adjusted from $70.00 per hour to $73.50 per hour for Associated Engineers, Inc., Contract CO 03- 090. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City's Land Development Section currently utilizes two "contract public works inspectors" to supplement the two regular, full-time inspectors within the section. All four inspectors aze assigned to review, inspect and approve public works construction items built by private developers as a condition of development as well as utility construction. As development activity levels off, it has been necessary to continue to supplement existing City personnel with contract services due to the increase in utility construction. It has been determined that this option, as opposed to hiring additional full-time staff, provides the greatest flexibility to meet the cuttent high level of demand for services while allowing the City to adjust to lower demand levels in the future without the need to decrease full-time, permanent staff. The cuttent contract (CO 03-090; originally approved September 3, 2003) with Associated Engineers, the fum supplying the contract inspection personnel, has been developed through iterative negotiations and such contract does not include an automatic annual cost-of-living adjustment. Instead, Associated annually submits a request to the City to consider an increase to the hourly rate paid for such inspectors. Most recently, Associated Engineers sent cottespondence requesting that the hourly rate be adjusted from the current $70.00/hour to $73.50/hour. The stated justification for the higher costs is higher employee, insurance and gasoline costs (Associated provides for their inspectors' vehicles and cell phones at no extra charge to the City). The adjusted hourly rate of $73.50 per hour is still highly competitive when comparing rates with other inspection firms and it should be noted that there are no on-call or retainer costs included in the current Associated contract; costs are only incutted when services are actually provided. As a market rate comparison, the City cuttently contracts with only one other firm, Aufbau Corporation, for public works inspectors utilized on City-funded Public Works projects; the current hourly rate charged by Aufbau is $89.00/hr. As the demand For inspection services has continued to produce a P132 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: APPROVAL OF A CON"TRACT AMENDMENT (CONTRACT CO 03-090) ADJUSTING THE HOURLY RATE FOR INSPECTION SER~~ICES PROVIDED BY ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, INC. SEPTEMBER 19, 2007 PAGE 2 workload requiring supplemental consultant services, staff is forwazding a recommendation for Council to approve the revised hourly rate so that the City may continue to utilize the services of the two contract inspectors currently serving as part of the City's 4-person Land Development Inspection Team. Appropriate funds to cover this increase in inspection services have been budgeted in FY07/08 Engineering account for Contract Services 1001-305-5000. Respectfully submitted, ~ ~ ~~jl`` >~ D William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:DJaIv Attachments P133 Memo To: Dan James City of Rancho Cucamonga -Engineering Dept. From: Jim Imbiorski Date: August 21, 2007 Re: Fee Increase far Public Works Inspector Dan, The current rate being charged to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for inspection services is $70.00/hour. This rate was negotiated in July of 2006 and is an adjustment to our standard rate of $105.00/hour. Due to increased costs of living and hard costs such as insurance, gasoline, etc., we request raising the hourly rate to $73.501hour. This new rate would apply to both Alex Sanchez and Richard Dustin and will be effective 9/1!07. This rate includes the full benefit package, a truck that includes gas, maintenance, and insurance. If you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us at (909) 960-1982. JJI/db ce: Tom Manley, AE J.N. 99-101 O>I091Y.TICw~eatotw~a+.w.is ~Aneemalaoc PI 34 ~7 °'~ STAFF REPORT Date: September 19, 2007 RANCHO To: Mayor and Members of the City Council C,UCAMONGA Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Kimberly S. Thomas, Management Analyst III, City Manager's Office Fabian A. Villenas, Management Analyst III, City Manager's Office Subject: APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CHAFFEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION TO BROADCAST THE "CHAFFEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION TELETHON" ON RCTV-3 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council consider and approve an agreement with the Chaffey College Foundation to broadcast the Chaffey College Telethon 2007 from the Chaffey College Theater, on RCTV-3, the City's PEG channel (Government Access), through assistance provided to the College by Charter Communications. The Telethon will be broadcast on: Friday, October 26, 2007, from 5 p.m. to 11 p.m., Saturday, October 27, 2007, from 4 p.m. to 11 p.m., and Sunday, October 28, 2007, from noon/12 p.m. to 10 p.m., for a total of twenty-three (23) Telethon hours over three days (minor overages may be encountered for a smooth transition in programming). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In the City of Rancho Cucamonga where Charter Communications is the primary cable provider for the PEG channel, the Telethon will be available on RCTV-3 (as well as for customers that receive the same RCTV-3 feed from Time Warner). The Telethon will no longer be available on Time Warner's Channel 10 (previously Adelphia's channel) as that service is no longer provided. In addition, the College will webcast the Telethon again this year. All arrangements with the providers Charter and Time Warner aze secured by the Foundation as a part of the cable provider's community television efforts. As part of their community television efforts, Charter Communications will provide Chaffey College with a temporary connection to Charter's system via fiber optic cable, which will allow for the airing of the Telethon on RCTV-3. The fiber optic cable is located in the Chaffey College Theater, and it is from this location that the Telethon will be taped. A temporary transmitter/receiver will be hooked up for the purpose of the Telethon only. Charter will manually switch the feed from RCTV-3 programming to the Telethon feed between the airings of the Telethon. Charter will test the signal before the Telethon, for signal quality prior to broadcast for approximately 30 minutes on Thursday, October 25, 2007. The City will provide no technical services. The City's RCTV-3 operating guidelines maintain that entities and groups eligible to submit messages or programming to be aired on RCTV-3 include local government, local public educational institutions, and public agencies, as well as agencies whose events are co-sponsored by the City. RCTV-3 programming may not include content considered obscene; promoting illegal activities; activities that attempt to defraud the viewer or attempt to obtain money by fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises; commercial advertising; or messages promoting, endorsing or opposing a political candidate, initiative or election issue. The attached agreement (MOU) includes these provisions. P135 APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CHAFFEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION TO BROADCAST THE "CHAFFEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION TELETHON" ON RCTV-3 P:~ci; 2 The Chaffey College Foundation and its community partners present the Telethon for developing funds that will be directed to student scholarships and will allocate funds received from the Telethon toward scholarships. The previous Telethons have raised hundreds of thousands of dollars for student scholarships. The Chaffey College Foundation's goal is to continue to expand the scholarship fund for more students in need. Scholarships will again be awarded on the Telethon this year to demonstrate to the community how their donation toward last year's Telethon is directly benefiting students. The sponsors from previous year's Chaffey College Telethons have agreed to support this year's Telethon. According to the Foundation, sponsors' donations will show on the screen and "craw]" throughout the Telethon. The importance of the financial resources for college will be the emphasis. The sponsors will speak about the importance of education to their success. These segments will be 30 to 60 seconds and may be aired more than once. Both live and taped business and personal testimonials will be aired. They will focus on the benefits of Chaffey College's valuable Associate Degrees, certification in academic and vocational fields, two-year general education, and major course fields for transfer to a four-year college or university program, as well as continuing education and life enrichment programs. According to the Foundation, as in prior years, the Telethon programming will be comprised of community-oriented entertainment. They will present entertainment acts/groups from the local area. Al] of these entertainment acts have been pre-screened by the Foundation for appropriateness of content and topics to ensure the language and nature of the entertainment is within keeping of general audience viewing. All live entertainers will be receiving instructions from the Foundation/College on acceptable behavior before a viewing audience. The program will be hosted and no commercial elements will be allowed. Again, in accordance with City, and related guidelines, statements of a political or commercial nature will not be allowed. CONCLUSION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Chaffey College Foundation to broadcast the community based Chaffey College Telethon from the Chaffey College Theater on RCTV-3. Respectfully submitted, Kimberly S/Thomas Management Analyst III Cable Franchise Admin. _` pl.r- 1~.--- Fabian A. Villenas Management Analyst I11 RCTV-3 Admin. Attachment(s) -Memorandum of Understanding P136 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CHAFFEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("CITY") operates a Public, Education and/or Government access channel (the City's PEG channel) ("RCTV-3"), via its local cable franchise agreement with Charter Communications; and WHEREAS, RCTV-3 airs a governmental and information Bulletin Board that displays text messages the majority of the time, which is normally supplemented with key government and community related programming aired during prime-time viewing; and WHEREAS, it is part of the CITY'S public service mission to offer relevant informational and educational television programming to the public in the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the Chaffey College Foundation Telethon is being produced by Chaffey College Foundation ("FOUNDATION") and its Community Partners, for the sole purpose of developing funds that will be directed to student scholazships, and the Foundation Boazd will allocate all funds received from the Telethon; and WHEREAS, the CITY'S RCTV-3 operating guidelines provide that entities and groups eligible to submit messages or programming to be aired on RCTV-3 include: local government, local public educational institutions, and public agencies, as well as agencies whose events are co- sponsored by the CITY; based thereon, the Chaffey College Foundation Telethon is appropriate for airing on RCTV-3; and WHEREAS, the CITY and the FOUNDATION desire to enter into this Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") whereby the FOUNDATION will direct and coordinate the production and transmission of programming appropriate for taped and live cablecast on RCTV-3 during specified time slots scheduled for October 2007, as set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, the FOUNDATION and the CITY agree as follows 1. The CITY shall make available to the FOUNDATION designated and agreed-to time slots for the 2007 Telethon programming, produced for general viewership and coordinated by the FOUNDATION. The designated and agreed-to time slots are as follows: The Telethon will be broadcast on: Friday, October 26, 2007, from 5 p.m. to 11 p.m.; Saturday, October 27, 2007, from 4 p.m. to 11 p.m.; Sunday, October 28, 2007, from noon/12 p.m. to 10 p.m. for a total of twenty-three (23) Telethon hours over three days (minor overages maybe encountered for a smooth transition in programming). 1 P137 2. The FOUNDATION shall be solely responsible for the programming aired during the agreed-to time slots. Anew MOU addressing programming for the FOUNDATION'S Telethon to be conducted in 2007, and any years thereafter, will need to be entered into. 3. The FOUNDATION shall abide by and conform to eligibility and content guidelines for RCTV-3 programming. Pursuant to those content guidelines, prohibited programming includes, but is not limited to, content considered obscene; content that promotes illegal activities, activities that attempt to defraud the viewer or attempt to obtain money by fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises; commercial advertising; or messages promoting, endorsing or opposing a political candidate, initiative or election issue; and content which predominately conveys a religious or political message. 4. The CITY shall not be responsible in the event any of the scheduled airings do not occur due to any technical reason, including failure of Charter's system or Chaffey's equipment, or due to any other circumstances beyond CITY'S reasonable control. 5. The FOUNDATION shall be responsible for ensuring that Charter Communications and Adelphia resume normal RCTV-3 programming and feed during hours when the Telethon is not being broadcasted. The FOUNDATION expressly understands and agrees that at no time may RCTV-3 be dazk, i.e., without programming, during non-Telethon hours. 6. The FOUNDATION shall be responsible for damages caused by the acts or omissions of its officers, employees, volunteers or agents that occur in relation to its exercise of rights or required performance under this Agreement. Likewise, the CITY shall be responsible for damages caused by the acts or omissions of its officers, employees, or agents that occur in relation to its exercise of rights or required performance under this Agreement. The intent of this pazagraph is that each party shall be responsible for any damages caused by its own negligence, arising out of or occurring in connection with this MOU. 7. The FOUNDATION agrees that consideration for the Chaffey Telethon's live broadcast on RCTV-3 will be reconsidered on a yearly basis. 8. This Agreement sets forth the entire understanding between the CITY and the FOUNDATION with respect to the subject matter herein. No representation or promise, whether express or implied, written or oral, that is not contained herein shall be binding or of any force or effect between the parties. By signing below, the FOUNDATION and CITY indicate their willingness to be bound by this Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and all provisions herein. CHAFFEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: By: Title: Date: By: _ Title: Date: 2 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A A~D M I N IS T R A T IV E ~S E R V I C E S Staff Report DATE: September 19, 2007 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: John Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services BY: Manuel Pilonieta, Information Services Manager /-4~ SUBJECT: APPROVE ANNUAL SUPPORT AGREEMENT WITH SUNGARD BI-TECH INC. TO PROVIDE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007/08 IN THE AMOUNT OF $85,776.43 FUNDED BY ACCOUNT NUMBER 1001209-5300 AND APPROVE AN OPTION TO RENEW WITH A NEGOTIATED ANNUAL INCREASE, UPON MUTUAL CONSENT. AN ANNUAL SUPPORT AGREEMENT FOR AN ADDITIONAL FOUR (4) YEARS RECOMMENDATION Approve annual support agreement with SunGard Bi-Tech, Inc., to provide maintenance support for Fiscal Year 2007/08 in the amount of $85,776.43 funded by account number 1001209-5300 and approve an option to renew with a negotiated annual increase, upon mutual consent, an annual support agreement for an additional four (4) years. BACKGROUND The City selected SunGard Bi-Tech Inc.'s Integrated Fund Accounting System (IFAS) as its financial and human resources software solution in August 1999 and went live on the software October 1, 2000. The Information Services Division annually enters into asole-source annual support agreement with Sungard Bi-Tech Inc. to ensure the application is up-to-date and free of known defects thereby protecting the City from possible service disruptions. The maintenance agreement also includes call center technical support. P138 Due to the proprietary nature of IFAS, Sungard Bi-Tech Inc. is the sole-source provider for application maintenance and technical support. The support agreement covers the period of September 24, 2007 through September 23, 2008. Page 2 Sungard Bi-Tech Annual Support Agreement September 19, 2007 As the continued use of IFAS is anticipated for the next five years, staff also recommends authorization to renew the agreement for these additional years. A sole source justification report is attached. Re tfully submitted, John Gillison Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services P139 P140 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA '~ SINGLE/SOLE SOURCE JUSTIFICATION FOR PURCHASES $5,000 AND ABOVE Rti~)etJo CUCRi~40NGA G'Al.ti?ORiti 11 The below information is provided in support of my Department requesting approval for a single/sole source. Outside of a duly declared emergency, the time to develop a statement of work or specifications is not in itself justification for single or sole source. Vendor: SunGard Bi-Tech Date: Sep 10, 2007 Commodity/Service: Annual support agreement for maintenance on IFAS Estimated expenditure: $135,776.00 Extent of market search conducted: None Price Reasonableness: Yes Does moving forward on this product/service further obligate the City to future similar Contract actual arrangements? This is annual support agreement for maintenance on the financial and human resources software used by Finance and Purchasing. DEFINITIONS: SINGLE SOURCE - a transaction with a business entity that is chosen, without competition, from among two or more business entities capable of supplying or providing the goods or services that meet the specified need. SOLE SOURCE - A transaction with the only business entity capable of supplying or providing the goods or services that meet the specified need. Initial all entries below that apply to the proposed purchase (more than one entry will apply to most single/sole source products/services requested). If needed, attach a memorandum containing complete justification and support documentation as directed in initial entry. THIS IS A/SINGLE SOURCE __ THIS IS A SOLE SOURCE PURCHASE ~ (check one). 1. J SINGLE/SOLE SOURCE REQUEST IS FOR THE ORIGINAL MANUFACTURER, THERE ARE NO REGIONAL DISTRIBUTORS. (Item no. 3 also must also be completed). 2. THE PARTS/EQUIPMENT ARE NOT INTERCHANGEABLE WITH SIMILAR PARTS OF ANOTHER MANUFACTURER. (Explain in separate memorandum). Your Name: Manuel Pilonieta D:\TempFiles\Temporary Internet Files\OLIC2IC\Sole Source Justification Forth (3).doc Single/Sole Source JustiScation Form Page 2 3. `/ THIS IS THE ONLY KNOWN ITEM OR SERVICE THAT WILL MEET THE SPECIALIZED NEEDS OF THIS DEPARTMENT OR PERFORM THE INTENDED FUNCTION. (Attach memorandum with details of specialized function or application). 4. UNIQUE FEATURES OF THE SUPPLY/SERVICE BEING REQUESTED. THERE IS NO ALTERNATIVE SUPPLIER. (Attach memorandum with reasons why these unique features are and what benefit the City will accrue.) 5. THE PARTS/EQUIPMENT ARE REQUIRED FROM THIS SOURCE TO PERMIT STANDARDIZATION (Attach memorandum describing basis for standardization request). 6. NONE OF THE ABOVE APPLY. A DETAILED EXPLANATION AND JUSTIFICATION FOR THIS SINGLE/SOLE SOURCE REQUEST IS CONTAINED IN ATTACHED MEMORANDUM. P141 The undersigned requests that competitive procurement be waived and that the vendor identified as the supplier of the service or material described in this single/sole source justification be authorized as a single/sole source fgr-tt~e seru~ic~ oecial. Ac~m~nls~-r~t-t~U2 SeNic es Department Head: Department: • . • . • . . • • . Purchasing Department • • • • • • • • • • d APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITION/S DISAPPROVE Comments: $5,000 - $50,000 ~~ 9 / ~ APPROVED BY PURCHASING MANAGER: Date: Z -b $50,000 - 100,000 APPROVED BY CITY MANAGER: $100,000 AND OVER See comments above by Purchasing Division, attach to Council Request CITY COUNCIL ACTION: D:\TempFiles\Temporary Iutemet Files\OLK21 C\Sole Source Justification Form (3).doc 1/18/07 P142 Memorandum DATE: September 10, 2007 T0: Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager FROM: Manuel Pilonieta, Information Services Manager P`t' SUBJECT: Sole Source Justification-SunGard Bi-Tech This memo serves as justification for a Sole Source requisition for SunGard Bi-Tech for annual maintenance support. The agreement covers software that is proprietary to SunGard B~Tech. This support agreement covers the period of September 24, 2007 through September 23, 2008. Please let me know if you have any questions. P143 STAFF REPORT ~ ~~-~ ENGINEERING DEPdRTDIENT ii 1 Date: September 19, 2007 RANCHO CUCAb90NGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Ty Quaintance, Facilities Superintendent Subject: APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE EMCOR SERVICE/MESA ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. (EMCOR SERVICE) TO CONTINUE AS THE SINGLE SOURCE SERVICE PROVIDER AND INSTALLER FOR HVAC/CONTROL WORK AND RELATED ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR CITY FACILITIES; APPROVE CONTRACT AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 FOR ADDITIONAL MONTHLY MAINTENANCE SCOPE OF WORK AT THE CULTURAL ARTS CENTER ($9,528.00) AND HVAC WATER TREATMENT FOR CULTURAL ARTS CENTER AND CENTRAL PARK ($2,560.00); APPROVE EXTRA WORK NOT TO EXCEED $150,000; AND APPROVE THE FOLLOWING CAPITAL MAINTENANCE PROJECTS APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY IN THE FY 2007/2008 BUDGET: HVAC MODIFICATIONS AT THE CIVIC CENTER FOR DEPARTMENT REMODELS ($80,000), HVAC UNIT FOR CENTRAL PARK COMPUTER ROOM ($81,000), AND PERFORM INDOOR AIR QUALITY MODIFICATIONS AS NEEDED AT CITY WIDE FACILITIES ($10,000); TO BE FUNDED FROM 1001312-5304 ($159,528), 2650801- 5602 ($80,000), 2650801-5603 ($81,000) and 1025001-5304 ($10,000) AND APPROPRIATE $80,000 INTO ACCOUNT NUMBER 2650801-5602 AND $81,000 INTO ACCOUNT NUMBER 2650801-5603 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve and authorize EMCOR Service/Mesa Energy Systems, Inc. (EMCOR Service) to continue as the single source service provider and installer for HVAC/control work and related energy management systems for city facilities; approve contract for amendment no. 1 for additional monthly maintenance scope of work at the Cultural Arts Center for HVAC Building Automation maintenance ($9,528.00) and HVAC water treatment for Cultural Arts Center and Central Park ($2560.00); approve extra work not to exceed $150,000; and approve the following capital maintenance projects approved by the City Council and Redevelopment Agency in the FY 2007/2008 budget: HVAC modifications at the Civic Center for department remodels ($80,000), HVAC unit for Central Park Computer room ($81,000), and perform indoor air quality modifications as needed at city-wide facilities ($10,000); to be funded from 1001312-5304 ($159,528), 2650801-5602 ($80,000), 2650801-5603 ($81,000) and 1025001-5304 ($10,000) and appropriate $80,000 into account number 2650801-5602 and $81,000 into account number 2650801-5603. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS In August 2003, City Council approved EMCOR Service as the single source provider of HVAC services for City facilities. Due to their extensive knowledge of our systems, their work on integration for the Citywide Facilities, the recent addition of the Fire Stations under HVAC contract, P144 EMCOR SERVICE/MESA ENERGY, CONTRACT AMENDMENT, EXTRA WORK AND CAPITAL PAGE 2 PROJECT APPROVAL SEPTEMBER 19. 2007 EMCOR is uniquely qualified to remain as the single source vendor for HVAC and related Energy Management Systems. Through routine meetings, project predevelopment and proposals for referenced extra work, staff is able to ensure cost effective management of the City's HVAC systems. EMCOR has committed numerous staff to our account, including a Senior Account Manager, several technical staff, dispatch staff, 24 hour on-call services, building automation technicians, chiller mechanics, etc. However, in keeping with good management practices, staff's strategy is to be prepared to re-bid maintenance services for our extremely complex system within 24 months. In addition, EMCOR continues to provide progressive energy savings strategies and preventive maintenance, assisting the City in efforts toward reducing energy consumption for the various buildings. One of the energy efficient capital projects Emcor completed during last year's budget was replacing the existing piston driven compressors at the Civic Center to Turbocor centrifugal driven compressors which requires up to forty percent less electricity and came with a twenty thousand dollar rebate from Southern California Edison. EMCOR is holding their monthly maintenance pricing as well as the hourly rates for extra work to the original 2003 quote for service. In conclusion, staff recommends Council approve the amendment of this agreement and grant the City Engineer authority to renew said agreement at the conclusion of the agreement term if such a need is warranted until such time staff completes the development of an updated and comprehensive bid package in order to solicit competitive proposals. Respectfully Submitted ~ ~~~~~~~' ~v/G William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TO:dlw P145 ~~:~.. ~~~ ~,. .- - T H E C I T Y O F RANCtIO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: September 19, 2007 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY DETERMINATION DRC2007-00459 - HAN MA EUM MARKET - A request to issue a Public Convenience or Necessity determination for a Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) Type 21 Off-Sale General license for an Asian food store in the Community Commercial District, located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue at 9849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit M - APN: 0208-301-i6. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the determination of a Public Convenience or Necessity for Han Ma Eum Market through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval, and forward a copy to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). ANALYSIS: A. Continuance: This item was originally scheduled on the Consent Calendar for the August 15, 2007, City Council meeting. On that date staff received a petition protesting the applicant's request. The item was continued until the September 19, 2007, City Council meeting in order to give staff time to schedule a neighborhood meeting. B. Neighborhood Meeting: Staff scheduled the neighbor meeting for.August 30, 2007, and sent out notice of the meeting to all property owners within a 660 feet radius of the site. Two residents and the applicant attended the meeting. Both residents in attendance supported the applicant's request. C. Background: The Han Ma Eum Market is located at the southwest corner of Ramona Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, as shown on the attached Site Plan. The applicant's establishment specializes in Asian food products including meats, produce, and packaged goods. They currently have an ABC Type-20 Off Sale Beer and Wine license and are requesting to upgrade to a Type-21 Off Sale General license. The change is requested in order to sell Soju, a popular Korean distilled alcoholic beverage. The area currently devoted to alcohol sales in the store is very small (less than 10 linear feet of shelf space), and the applicant has informed staff that they will only increase that display area by a small amount. They are open Monday through Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. P146 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00459 - HAN MA EUM MARKET September 19, 2007 Page 2 D. Reouirements from Department of Alcohol Beverage Control: The Department of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) regulates the distribution of liquor licenses by setting limits on the various types of licenses in each census tract. The limits are calculated based on the ratio of liquor licenses to the population of the census tract. According to the ABC staff, the off-sale and on-sale licenses in this census tract (0021) total 34. This is 18 over the limit of the 16 licenses, which necessitates a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity. Additionally, the ABC staff stated that a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) is required by the local agency (as governed by Section 23958 of the Business and Professional Code), because of a moratorium on all new ABC licenses within San Bernardino County. The legislation purposely left the term Public Convenience or Necessity undefined, so that the local legislative body, in this case the City Council, would have the greatest latitude for discretion based on the local conditions and circumstances. E. Facts to Support a Public Convenience or Necessity Determination: The following are facts to support the requested Public Convenience or Necessity. Fact: A retailer of alcoholic beverages, specialty foods, and other related items is a common and accepted business. Fact: The site is located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue; Foothill Boulevard is designated as a major thoroughfare, and the site is suited for this type of business. Fact: The census tract in which the site is located (0021), also includes the Ontario Mills shopping center in the City of Ontario, which has a large number of restaurants with alcohol licenses. The Ontario Mills shopping center is physically separated from the majority of residential neighborhoods in Rancho Cucamonga by an industrial district, greatly diminishing potential negative effects that an additional alcohol license will have on the City's residential neighborhoods. Fact: The site" is not close to sensitive users, such as day care facilities, schools, and/or churches. Fact: Rancho Cucamonga residents would be afforded more convenient shopping opportunities with the addition of distilled spirits to the current selection of Asian food products, beer and wine provided by the market. CONCLUSION: Based on the above analysis, staff finds that the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control Off-Sale General license (Type 21) at the site will not have a negative impact to the surrounding uses. Respectfully submitted, C~' "~ J( - Jame R.Troyer, AICP UV Planning Director JT:TV/ds P147 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00459 - HAN MA EUM MARKET September 19, 2007 Page 3 Attachments: Exhibit A -Project Location Exhibit B -Aerial Exhibit C -Site Plan Exhibit D -Floor Plan Exhibit E -Census Map Exhibit F -ABC Application Work Sheet Exhibit G -Neighborhood Meeting Sign in Sheet from the August 30, 2007, meeting Resolution of Approval for Public Convenience and Necessity DRC2007-00459 ~-- ao 7 _s - ~ C m.. ~ _ ~ c ~- o eny uaneF{ ~ - P148 i yM > E _ a o e - -o $ ay ie~ueD any sarue D it ~rar Ave iy fd ~I6ryey' y _ w _ , el IO y E !A W (A n WnS ~ ~ N $ _ Z W ~ BA ' eso Y} wrb _ y y E N N c _ 1 (N. z .raM ~ 1 ~ ~ i0 ij ; co i ~, DevancMre esiewoS .. ~. 4 . ~:. ~E ' xa e1!4al1OA 1 ~ +D aaflM .. ~ day euaurey a~ Y 9~~ad ~ordW~ a u an .E t s ~ a' ~ ~g r ~ LJJ ~ m 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~` P« N °c Jodoila Ave 1 ! I J ° // VI m 6 N pp ~& tl W 11 ~ m ., yCN 6 ~ T Av e U w N Z' ~ N ~ ~ sl z U ~ Ave ~ ~ ~ ~ W N ~I i~ W V J B 1S 1^-Atlea+V ~ ~ IS BWAeI S ^ ii. sF{ m eny swlaH iB ~ ~ m i w m o € m ~ g ~ , m x r v J ~ m ~ o ~ui>.'PJ e wen F ~ y p 3 Psa ~pa J ~ ~ m r,Alrltar • E y y U N .. m m C _ ~ E D r " asy IauiES w T ~ m ??t~ + Y.. U V E Swl¢me br m ~ +D ~aa c,a..N, t 9Z j~. aey WuAeu1, ' ? ~ h~ m+ e ScO~A ~I 1 D n: EXHIBIT A P149 EXHIBIT B P150 Site%20Plan.jpg (7PEG Image, 2208x3104 pixels) file:///E:/Mke's%20Docs/I.asBrisas/Siu°1o20Plan.jpg f i ~~.~z~ ~ Lis ~ ~ ~~s ,- ' -- gAMONA AVE. `/ ~ ~~ [I~+Hii-0 7 J m J J S F- O F~ l ~~, ~= 9/22/2003 12:40 PM EXHIBIT C ~- ~--- P151- pae gnu s~ ~ ~ 6mfnd~o ICgsaod sop~m ~F 1.'~~ ~eatisg aEI~A~IY3o 4ciaQ aq;3o > ~ arntd Suiar~os puc 8m~poa ~ P~4~ oR 1~ lI!~- `~ asanm ~.uo pa~g~ ss soA~cio p~aueld Pus !a4 P~4!~P'~9g ~ >~ P~~P ~4~W ~! iI .. .... ... ~YAu n i .. .~ 1 =,.,~ r ~. i ~, 1 ~~ Y'_iV-Y YY ~~ rJ QbQt 1__~ J"i ~ ~ ~~~~~~'T ~T.'(_ _~ lr~~w~~ "1 ~Y IY#o1~'MY _](~jI11111R.f1~iI/ ~~ ~~~ EXH I B IT D '~"'~''"'~'~"'° ~"'°~ °~g'~" (_ ~ P152 ~7 ''.:~~ ~ m 7 - m O _ _ . ~ C ~ ~ . i ,, ,.. _ W ~~ 2rnfA O .~ ! ~) v ~ ~ r `_:< +w :f~~e~ ~ ~ ~A -r : ,• { ~~ n 1 i r 5 ilr. ~~ ~ v ,k '~' ~ ray ~' , ~ : O ~ +1'„' d'~ I ~ ,t ~~{fa' AMY Mf n z, a~..` ' ~y .:; i~4 F-~4.tY~,;~SX v ;n5'i v afis ~Y i' A'~ 1 r .. is y~I1y :~ r_;~ _ Y , TTY ` A Y.". aJ• 1 ye _ 4 T ~ ~ PLO ~'[ _ A `•! •~.~ ,y 4 1 4 n ,. lI t ~ Y .~ h./+ .. ..-' ~ ~ F ~ o- ! b~ ! ~x y ~ t T 'r ~ y { r •L r ]~ ' M N Ji1 }~ ,~LL__ M1 C . ~ Jam" `~» Y~ ^f~ ' {~ rv~, t } ~ O }Vf~ ~f~; (n ~ i p1 I ' ~v. a t~~ ~JY+YJIr` l {L(4{y' 4 AS A O ! `I ~ 1 { vI ~r.1i ~k~~+~~ ! 4 } ~ '. i O V t.i l IrF~l. ~'F } _ ~ 41'i' ^n ^~C15v1' ~+'~Y it ! L~~t a° yu r ~' .~: ~ i~ ~ ;p ! ~+7 ' :O ~ x -er :.'~ ~{ If..M } I N O _; EXHIBIT E - ~~ ~ P153 23958.4 B 8 P APPLICATION WORKSHEET PREMISES ADDRESS: 989 ~~ csr~o c~r~. ~n 9P~rm ~~leAmad~Q~(y,Q -~~~/ 9~~~ LICENSE TYPE: ~/r ~ 11~RI0~ ~ 1 1 1. CRIME REPORTING DISTRICT Jurisdiction unable to provide statistical data. Reporting District: Total number of reporting districts: Total number of offenses: Average number of offenses per district: 120% of average number of offenses: Total offenses in d'atrict: Location Is wllhin o high crime reporting district: Yes / No 2: CENSUS TRACT /UNDUE CONCENTRATION Census Tract: Population: 1County Ratlo Number of licenses allowed:~_• Number of exating iicenses:_SJ__L___• Undue concentration e ' :Yes o. Letter of public convenience or necess(ty requi d: Governing Bod plicant. _..- - .. .. .. Three time publication requir Ye No Person eking Application Investigator Supervisor EXHIBIT F Sign in Sheet DRC2007-00459 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. Name ~~~` N r1 ez Cf~ aA-ursc~ Address P154 EXHIBIT G P155 RESOLUTION NO. 07- f ~Ilp A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY DRC2007-00459 FOR AN ASIAN FOOD STORE IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ROMONA AVENUE AT 9849 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, UNIT M-APN: 0208-301-16. A. Recitals. 1. Han Ma Eum Market filed an application for Public Convenience or Necessity determination DRC2007-00459, as described in the title of this Resolution, for a Type 21 (General Off-Sale) license from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). 2. Section 23958 of the Business and Professional Code requires the City of Rancho Cucamonga to make a determination that the issuance of the said license will service the public convenience or necessity. 3. On the 19th day of September 2007, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga reviewed said application prior to the adoption of this Resolution. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced meeting on September 19, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. A retailer of alcoholic beverages, specialty foods, and other related items is a common and accepted business; and b. The site is located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue; Foothill Boulevard is designated as a major thoroughfare, and the site is suited for this type of business; and c. The census tract in which the site is located (0021) also includes the Ontario Mills shopping center in the City of Ontario, which has a large number of restaurants with alcohol licenses. The Ontario Mills shopping center is physically separated from the majority of the residential neighborhoods in Rancho Cucamonga by an industrial district, greatly diminishing P156 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07- DRC2007-00459 - HAN MA EUM MARKET September 19, 2007 Page 2 potential negative effects that an additional alcohol license will have on the City's residential neighborhoods; and d. The site is not close to sensitive users, such as day care facilities, schools, and/or churches; and e. Rancho Cucamonga residents would be afforded more convenient shopping opportunities with the addition of distilled spirits to the current selection of Asian food products, beer and wine provided by the market; and f. With the imposition of a condition recommended by the City and set forth in Section 5, the retailer will operate the business in a mannerthat would not result in a change of use from a market to a liquor store in violation of the City's Development Code. 3. Based upon the findings set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, and with the condition specified in Section 5, this City Council concludes that the issuance of an off-sale beer and wine license for Han Ma Eum Market will not have a negative impact to the surrounding uses. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this City Council hereby determines that with the imposition of the condition specified in Section 5, the issuance of an off-sale liquor license for Man Ma Eum Market will service the Public Convenience or Necessity. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby approves the request for a Public Convenience or Necessity determination subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planning Department 1) The area devoted to the display and sale of alcoholic beverages shall be limited to a maximum 10 percent of the floor area. Any increase above and beyond this limit will result in Code Enforcement action and ultimately to the revocation of the store business license. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEP.~IRTTIENT Date: September 19, 2007 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. ONeil, City Engineer By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Tech. II RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR PARCEL MAP 15350, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND 6TH STREET, SUBMITTED BY GENERAL DYNAD~IICS PROPERTIES, INC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Parcel Map 15350, located at the southwest comer of Milliken Avenue and 6th Street, submitted by General Dynamics Properties, Inc. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER General Dynamics Properties, Inc. 3270 Inland Empire Boulevard, Ste. 440 Ontario, CA 91764 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond #814222 S Respectfully sub~mtted ~ ~ ~c~~- William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TLV $69, 310.00 P157 Attachment P158 8th STREET W ~ w ~ w Z 6th Q STREET ' S~ 4fh STREET ' Z z J ' Y Q ~Q V/CINlTY MAP N.T.S. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~; PA~PCEL /'1.4P/5350 ~,E; l//C/N,/TY MAP IIVGINEF,RING DIVISION STAFF REPORT RANQ-IO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTIONDISTRIGT Date: September 19, 2007 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief . .~ ~_r RANCHO G'UCAMONGA By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II Subject: ANNEXATION OF SUBTT1771i9 TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD 85-1) RECOMMENDATION Consideration of adoption of a resolution making determinations and authorizing the submittal of the levy of special taxes to the qualified electors of territory proposed to be annexed (Alder Creek, LLC -Annexation No. 07-7) to an existing Community Facilities District and calling a special election. BACKGROUND Alder Creek, LLC (SUBTT17769) has submitted a proposal to subdivide 2.75 acres into 11 lots on the southwest corner of Beryl Ave. & 19`" St. and is conditioned by the City and Fire District to annex to the existing Community Facilities District (CFD) 85-1 in order to mitigate the development's impact upon fire protection services. On August 15, 2007, the Board initiated formal annexation proceedings by adopting a resolution approving a boundary map (Exhibit "A") of the territory proposed to be annexed and the Resolution of Intention to Annex SUBTT17769 into the existing CFD 85-1. This resolution, among other things, declared the intention of the Board of Directors to levy a special tax within the territory proposed to be annexed to finance fire protection and suppression services and setting a public hearing regarding the proposed annexation to be held on September 19, 2007. Through adoption of this resolution before the Board this evening, the Board will accomplish the following: Make certain determinations as set forth in the resolution P159 Call for a special election to be conducted on September 26, 2007 Authorize submittal of the levy of the special tax to qualified electors P160 Annexation of Territory to an existing CFD 85-1 September 19, 2007 ANALYSIS The annexation of SUBTT17769 into CFD 85-1 will satisfy the conditions of development relating to mitigating impacts upon fire protection services. Rubber Tires & Customer Wheels, Inc., property owner, is in full support of the annexation of the property being annexed. The Registrar of Voters has certified there are no registered voters residing within the territory to be annexed. Therefore, the election will be a landowner's vote, the landowner having one vote per acre or portion thereof of land within the territory proposed to be annexed. Rubber Tires & Customer Wheels, Inc., property owner, has executed a "Consent and Waiver" of time frames relating to the election. Exhibit "A" of the Resolution sets forth the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax proposed to be levied within the territory to be annexed which is consistent with the special tax levied upon all territory currently within CFD 85-1. At the special election to be held on September 26, 2007, the landowner will cast their vote ballot(s). The Board Secretary will then canvas the ballot(s). At the next Board meeting, the Board will consider adopting the resolution declaring the election results. If 2/3 of the votes are cast in favor of the levy of the special tax, the Board may declare the property to be annexed. A representative for the property owner will be present during the meeting should any questions arise regarding these proceedings. The Public Notice regarding the Public Hearing has been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin. Respectfully submitted, ~a~~~\ Peter M. Bryan Fire Chief Attachments P161 RESOLUTION NO. FD 07- 053 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 07-7) TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD 85-1 ), CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS WHEREAS, the BOARD OF DIRECTORS (the "Board of Directors") of the RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT (the "Fire Protection District"), RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has previously declared its intention and held and conducted proceedings relating to the annexation of territory to an existing community facilities district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and specifically Article 3.5 thereof (the "Act"). The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (the "District"); and, WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing relating to the annexation of territory to the District, the extent of the territory to be annexed (the "Annexation Area"), the furnishing of certain public services and all other related matters has been given; and, WHEREAS, it has now been determined that written protests have not been received by 50% or more of the registered voters residing either within the Annexation Area or the District and/or property owners representing more than one-half (1 /2) or more of the area of land within the Annexed Area or within District; and, WHEREAS, inasmuch as there have been less than twelve (12) persons registered to vote within the Annexation Area for each of the 90 preceding days, this legislative body desires to submit the levy of the required special tax to the landowners of the Annexation Area, said landowners being the qualified electors as authorized by law. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. RECITALS The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. DETERMINATIONS It is determined by this Board of Directors that: A. all proceedings prior hereto were valid and taken in conformity with the requirements of law, and specifically the provisions of the Act; B. less than twelve (12) registered voters have resided within the Annexation Area for each of the ninety (90) days preceding the close of the public hearing and, consequently, the qualified electors shall be the landowners of the Annexation Area and each landowner who is the owner of record as of the close of the public hearing, or the authorized representative thereof, shall have one vote for each acre or portion of an acre of land that she or he owns within the Annexation Area; C. the time limit specified by the Act for conducting an election to submit the levy of the special taxes to the qualifed electors of the Annexation Area and the requirements for impartial analysis and ballot P162 Resolution No. FD 07- ©53 Page -2- arguments have been waived with the unanimous consent of the qualified electors of the Annexation Area; D. the Secretary, acting as the election official, has consented to conducting any required election on a date which is less than 125 days following the adoption of any resolution annexing the Annexation Area to the District; and E. the public services proposed to be financed from the proceeds of special taxes to be levied within the Annexation Area are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon the Fire Protection District as a result of development and/or rehabilitation occurring in the Annexation Area. SECTION 3. BOUNDARIES OF ANNEXED AREA The boundaries and parcels of land in the Annexation Area and on which special taxes are proposed to be levied in order to pay the costs and expenses for the public facilities and services described in Section 4 below are generally described as follows: All that property and territory proposed to be annexed to the District, as said property is shown on a map as previously approved by this legislative body, said map entitled "Boundary Map of Community Facilities District No. 85-1 Annexation No. 07-7 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County Of San Bernardino, State Of California" (the "Annexation Map'), a copy of which is on file in the Office of the Secretary and shall remain open for public inspection. SECTION 4. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The services that are authorized to be financed from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the District are certain services which are in addition to those services required for the territory within the District and will not be replacing services already available. A general description of the services authorized to be financed by the District is as follows: The performance by employees of functions, operations, maintenance and repair activities in order to provide fire protection and suppression services. The District shall finance all direct, administrative and incidental annual costs and expenses necessary to provide such services. The same types of services which are authorized to be financed by the District from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the District are the types of services proposed to be financed from the special taxes proposed to be levied within the Annexation Area. If and to the extent possible such services shall be provided in common with District and the Annexation Area. SECTION 5. SPECIAL TAX Except where funds are otherwise available and subject to the approval of the qualified electors of the Annexation Area, a special tax sufficient to pay for such services required for the Annexation Area, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the Annexation Area will be levied annually within the boundaries of the Annexation Area. For particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax, reference is made to the attached and incorporated Exhibit "A" which sets forth in sufficient detail the method of apportionment to allow each landowner or resident within the Annexation Area to clearly estimate the maximum amount of the special tax that such person will have to pay. P163 Resolution No. FD 07- 053 Page -3- The special taxes shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of delinquency, as applicable for ad valorem taxes; however, as applicable, this Board of Directors may, by resolution, establish and adopt an alternate or supplemental procedure as necessary. Any special taxes that may not be collected on the County tax roll shall be collected through a direct billing procedure by the Treasurer of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, acting for and on behalf of the District. SECTION 6. SPECIAL TAX ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES Pursuant to and in compliance with the provisions of Government Code Section 50075.1, this Board of Directors hereby establishes the following accountability measures pertaining to the levy by the District of the special taxes within the Revised Annexation Area as described in Section 5 above: A. Each such special tax shall be levied for the specifc purposes section in Section 5. above. B. The proceeds of the levy of each such special tax shall be applied only to the specific applicable purposes set forth in Section 5. above. C. The District shall establish a separate account into which the proceeds of the special taxes levied within the District shall be deposited. D. The Fire Chief or his or her designee, acting for and on behalf of the District, shall annually file a report with the Board of Directors as required pursuant to Government Code Section 50075.3. SECTION 7. ELECTION The proposition related to the levy of the special tax shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the Annexation Area, said electors being the landowners, with each landowner having one (1) vote for each acre or portion thereof of land which he or she owns within said annexed territory. The special election shall be held on the 26th day of September 2007, and said election shall be a special election to be conducted by the Secretary (hereinafter "Election Official"). If the proposition for the levy of the special tax receives the approval of more than two-thirds (2!3) of the votes cast on the proposition, the special tax maybe levied as provided for in this Resolution and the Board of Directors may determine that the Annexation Area is added to and part of the District. SECTION 8. BALLOT The ballot proposal to be submitted to the qualified voters at the election shall generally be as follows: PROPOSITION A RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, AUTHORIZATION FOR SPECIAL TAX LEVY Shall Community Facilities District No. 85-1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District be authorized to levy special taxes within the territory shown on "Boundary Map of Community Facilities District No. 85-1 Annexation No. 07-7 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County Of San Bernardino, State Of California" (the "Annexation Map") P164 Resolution No. FD 07- D 53 Page -4- pursuant to the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes (the "Special Tax Formula") set forth in Ordinance No. FD 44 to finance authorized services and administrative expenses? SECTION 9. VOTE The appropriate mark placed in the voting square after the word "YES" shall be counted in favor of the adoption of the proposition, and the appropriate mark placed in the voting square after the word "NO" in the manner as authorized, shall be counted against the adoption of said proposition. SECTION 10. ELECTION PROCEDURE The Election Official is herebyauthorized to take anyand all steps necessary for the holding of said election. Said Election Official shall perform and render all services and proceedings incidental to and connected with the conduct of said election, and said services shall include, but not be limited to the following: A. Prepare and furnish to the election officers necessary election supplies for the conduct of the election. B. Cause to be printed the requisite number of official ballots, tally sheets and other necessary forms. C. Furnish and address official ballots for the qualified electors of the Annexation Area. D. Cause the official ballots to be mailed and/or delivered, as required by law. E. Receive the returns of the election. Sort and assemble the election material and supplies in preparation for the canvassing of the returns. G. Canvass the returns of the election. H. Furnish a tabulation of the number of votes given in the election. Make all arrangements and take the necessary steps to pay all costs of the election incurred as a result of services performed for the District and pay costs and expenses of all election officials. Conduct and handle all other matters relating to the proceedings and conduct of the election in the manner and form as required bylaw. P165 Resolution No. FD 07- D 53 Page -5- PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _ day of 2007. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., President ATTEST: J. Adams, Secretary DEBRA J. ADAMS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a Regular Meeting of said Board held on the _ day of 2007. Executed this day of 2007 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, Secretary P166 Resolution No. FD 07- 0~3 Page -6- EXHIBIT "A" COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 ANNEXATION NO. 07-7 RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES The rate and method of apportionment, limitations on and adjustment to the Special Tax shall be as follows: To pay for fire suppression services and to finance fire suppression facilities, the Maximum Special Tax in Community Facilities District No. 85-1, Annexation No. 07-7 for Fiscal Year 2007-2008 shall be: Structures Maximum Annual Special Tax Residential 1 DU = ($143.31) Multi-Family 2 DU: 1.75 = ($143.31) 3 DU: 2.25 = ($143.31) 4 DU: 2.65 = ($143.31) 5-14 DU: 2.65 = ($143.31) + {.35 (TU-4) ($143.31)} 15-30 DU: 6.15 = ($143.31) + {.30 (TU-14) ($143.31)} 31-80 DU: 10.65 = ($143.31) + {.25 (TU-30) ($143.31)} 81 - up DU: 23.15 = ($143.31) + {.20 (TU-80) ($143.31)} Commercial ($143.31) per acre + $.078 per SF Industrial ($143.31) per acre + $.095 per SF Note: DU =Dwelling Unit TU =Total Units SF =Square Foot ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT The maximum Special Tax shall be annually adjusted commencing on July 1, 2007 and each July 1 s` thereafter for (a) changes in the cost of living or (b) changes in cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code, as amended, whichever is lesser. P167 Resolution No. FD 07- 05-3 Page -7- REDUCTION IN SPECIAL TAX Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a reduction in the Special Tax for the installation of complete sprinkler systems. In addition, multi-floor commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a reduction in Special Tax for each separate floor above or below the main ground floor of the structure. LIMITATION ON SPECIAL TAX LEVY The Special Tax shall only be levied on Developed Property. Developed Property is defined to be property: which is not owned by a public or governmental agency; which is not vacant; - where a "certificate of occupancy" or "utility release" from the City of Rancho Cucamonga has been issued; which has an existing building or structure onsite; - which does not have as its sole use power transmission towers, railroad tracks, and flood control facilities. Areas granted as easements for such purposes shall be subtracted from the total acreage of the underlying lot. The annual levy of the Special Tax shall be based upon an annual determination by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District of the amount of other revenues available to meet budget requirements. As used in this formula, "available revenue" shall include ad valorem taxes, State of California augmentation, tax increment revenues received from the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and any other source of revenue except the Special Tax. The Board of Directors shall take all responsible steps to retain maximum Redevelopment Agency funding to which, by agreement, they may lawfully receive. To the extent available revenues are insufficient to meet budget requirements, the Board of Directors may levy the Special Tax. For further particulars regarding the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Tax, reference is made to the Final Report Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 for Fire Suppression Facilities/Services -Foothill Fire Protection District, a copy of which is on fle in the office of the Fire Chief of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. P168 C I T Y O F ANCtIO C[ICAMONGA Staff Report DATE: September 19, 2007 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director BY: Vance Pomeroy, Contract Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00223 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC - A request to change the land use designation for four parcels on Red Hill Country Club Drive from Open Space to Mixed Use to be consistent with the Mixed Use land use designation at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue, to add these same four parcels to Section 2.5.5.4 Western Gateway in the Bear Gulch Area, expand the range of development in the Residential classification to 87 percent in Table III-7, and to establish a Master Plan Overlay District for the entire 10.1 acre project site on the Land Use Plan in accordance with Section 111.2.4.1 of the General Plan -APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 and 45. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2006-00350 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC - A request to change the zoning for four parcels on Red Hill Country Club Drive from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Mixed Use to be consistent with the Mixed Use zoning designation at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue; Establish a Master Plan Overlay District for the entire 10.1 acre project site on the Development District Map in accordance with Section 17.20.030 of the Development Code at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue -APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44, and 45. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2007-00029 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC - A request to change the table for the Bear Gulch Mixed-Use area contained in Development Code Section 17.32.020.0.3 to expand the range of development in the P169 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00223/DRC2006-00350/DRC2007-00029/DRC2006-00341/SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC September 19, 2007 Page 2 Residential classification to 87 percent and to include the Most Case column found in the General Plan Table III-7 -APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44, and 45. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC -Master Plan established under DRC2006-00223 and DRC2006-00350 for 10.1 acre project site with one 2-story office building, 7 live/work units, 68 town homes, and 23 single-family residences at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue in the Mixed Use Zone of Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts, including expansion of the range of development in the Residential classification to 87 percent in Table III-7 of the General Plan -APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44, and 45. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18179 - ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC -Condominium subdivision of 10.1 acres into two lots with office condominiums in one office building on Lot 1, and residential condominiums in 7 live/work units, 68 town homes, and 23 single-family residences on Lot 2 at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue in the Mixed Use Zone of Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts -APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 and 45. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission and Planning Department staff recommend approval of the General Plan Amendment, the Development District Amendment and the Development Code Amendment, and recommend affirmation of the approval determination for the Development Review and the Tentative Tract Map through adoption of the attached Ordinances and Resolutions of Approval with conditions. BACKGROUND/SITE CHARACTERISTICS: A. Proiect Density: Gross project site area: 10.1 acres; total dwelling units: 98; project density: 9.7 dwelling units per acre. B. Surroundino Land Use and Zoning: North - Golf Course\City of Upland Residential; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Service Station, Shops and Restaurants; Mixed Use East - Single-Family Residences; Low Residential (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) West - City of Upland; Commercial C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Foothill Boulevard Districts (Subarea 1); Mixed Use North - City of Upland; Open Space South - Foothill Boulevard Districts (Subarea 1); Mixed Use East - Open Space West - City of Upland P170 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00223/DRC2006-00350/DRC2007-00029/DRC2006-00341/SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC September 19, 2007 Page 3 D. Site Characteristics: The bulk of the subject site is currently developed as a row crop agricultural field having been generally confined to raising strawberries for many years. Several agriculturally related outbuildings and a former residence take up some of the southwest portion of the site. In addition, four parcels on the easterly part of the proposed development contain several, now-vacant, residences. Generally, the site is fairly flat with a gentle slope from the north to the south with few public improvements on the perimeter. Several trees occupy the site and are proposed for mitigated removal. E. Parking Calculations: Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Number of Spaces of Use Foota a Ratio Required Provided Residential 2/unit 196 196 Guest Parking 1/4 units 25 34 Office 12,610 square feet 1/250 square feet 50 52 TOTALS 271 282 In addition to the required parking for the site, the applicant has designed the single-family residences with space enough in front of each garage for two cars side-by-side and off of the drive aisle streets thus providing 46 additional parking spaces. In response to the request of the Design Review Committee, the applicant has provided a proposed covenant to require that the office parking lot will be able to be used by the residents during off hours, thus opening up a substantial reservoir of parking capacity, (52 spaces, 150 percent extra over the minimum number of guests spaces) in such case that a resident has an unusual number of guests. ANALYSIS: A. General: On June 26, 2007, the Planning Commission unanimously approved the subject development project and subdivision and recommended approval of the requested General Plan Amendment, Development District Amendment, and Development Code Amendment. The three amendments require City Council action. The development proposal and subdivision approvals were appealed. Both the appellant and the applicant agreed to extend the 30-day review time limit for subdivision appeals in order to allow all the requests to be heard on this same date. In approving the project, the Planning Commission found that the project is suitable for the site and the surrounding community and conforms to the General Plan. By extension, the Planning Commission, after taking extensive testimony from the public both for and against the project, agreed with the analysis found in the staff report presented to them which concluded that the project is appropriate and suitable for this location and for the surrounding area. Extended clarification for separate detailed issues is discussed below P171 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00223/DRC2006-00350/DRC2007-00029/DRC2006-00341/SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC September 19, 2007 Page 4 as Topic/Issue Details. The basic support for project approval is provided in the following Suitability Section. B. Suitability: Land use decisions are based on suitability: In a neighborhood where most of the land is already developed, decisions for an undeveloped location must be based on whether a use and its possible impacts are suitable for that location and the surrounding area. The fundamental question for determining the initial zoning which a parcel gets is this: Does this use (and what comes with it) provide a reasonable and suitable match for this location? In working out whether a change in zoning at any particular location is appropriate, this question is augmented with something like: Does the change make the matter more reasonable and more suitable for this location, or not? If the answer to the questions is yes, then the change is appropriate to approve. A comparison of the conditions possible before the change and after the change is instructive in answering these questions. For the subject project, the following comparisons are useful: Land Use designation change to Mixed Use: a}{j The existing land use designation of Mixed Use already covers 90 percent of the project site. The small easterly portion (shaded gray above) to be changed to Mixed Use is currently designated Open Space but is already covered by houses; therefore, the change to Mixed Use to match the rest of the corner is reasonable and is especially suitable since this project proposes residential uses on this portion. Note that the change to Mixed Use P172 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00223/DRC2006-00350/DRC2007-00029/DRC2006-00341/SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC September 19, 2007 Page 5 triggers the requirement to place a Master Plan Overlay District on that portion of the site in order to improve the site design and lock in the lower density proposed. District (zone) change to Mixed Use: The existing district (zone) for the majority of the project site now is Mixed Use. Only 10 percent of the site needs a change. It would go from Low Residential to Mixed Use, but that portion of the project has residential units proposed for it -seven complete units with portions of four others. An additional concern is that these four parcels have a zoning district that is not consistent with the Land Use designation in violation of California Government Code Section 65860. Note that, as previously mentioned, the change to Mixed Use triggers the requirement to place a Master Plan Overlay District on that portion of the site in order to improve the site design and lock in the lower density proposed. Use Mix change: Density is the measure of the number of dwelling units that can be placed on one acre. Intensity is usually used as a term that measures the amount of commercial floor area space that can be placed on a given amount of land. Density is measured per dwelling unit because the impacts come from the activities of families: the more families, the more activities. Intensity measures space because there are multiple participants in the activities in that space: the more space, the more people, and the more activities. The central quantitative controls for both density and intensity on the subject site are covered in Table III-7 of the General Plan and in Section 17.32.020.0.3 of the Development Code. Here, it is shown that having no intensity limits on commercial activities is considered suitable for this area, as well as having a density limit of 20 dwelling units per acre upon the site. The heart of the discussion in the General Plan for all the Mixed Use areas is not density or intensity, but that there should be a mix of uses. Table III-7 is essentially a Use Mix table. The aim of the General Plan discussion for this mix of uses is to provide "a high degree of flexibility and responsiveness to the market." The request here is not to increase intensity and it is not to increase density. The request is to broaden the mix of uses to provide more flexibility and responsiveness. The proposed project provides a mix of uses that is substantially more suitable for the site than what is permitted by being of lower intensity and being less dense than allowed at 11.2 dwelling units per acre rather than 20. The addition of the required Master Plan Overlay district locks in this lower density and lower intensity as well. Traffic impact change: Density and intensity concerns are reflected in the potential impacts that either may bring to a neighborhood. Traffic is a typical area of concern for potential impacts. P173 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00223/DRC2006-00350/DRC2007-00029/DRC2006-00341/SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC September 19, 2007 Page 6 o Proposed Project 7000 ~ .~ y Fes' '~yz ,~S',,.'t h ~„~'. , ~-~° a ~w ,r~ Lw, 6000 % ~ y ` ~§ ~ 5000 '~".,"` ' ~ ~ 1 ®Max for proposed ' ~~ `A'NT `~=`~'~w '~''~" change to Unit Mix c ~ 4000 n'~~ n+' ~~ ~'" a Table 3000 - - ~~r:?;'~ ' ~'~,~'..~`. ~~~ ,~,, ^Max Resid'I w/Med 2000 "~ ~ 126 Office 1000 p µ,, '"_~ ^ 95,000sf Retail 1 w/25 townhomes Project Alternatives ~ 180,000sf Med based on Unit Mix Table Office w/4 SFR's In comparing the traffic impacts on this site, one examines the concentration allowed by the zoning and what the change, coupled with the proposed project, will result in. As seen by the possible alternative projects allowed on the site in the chart above, the change in the maximum amount of residential in the mix of uses clearly can produce a substantially lower traffic impact than that which is now permitted. The addition of the required Master Plan Overlay district locks in this lower traffic count as well. Clearly, a daily trip count of 799 is much more suitable than 6541 for this area. C. Topic/Issue Details: Four major topics deserving of further detailed explanations are covered in the following sections. Traffic -The proposed project has been analyzed by the applicant's traffic engineers, and the resulting report has been reviewed and accepted as valid by the City's Traffic Engineer. Generally, the findings of the report are that the traffic impact from the project is not significant in quantity and quality. Based on industry standards, the project will generate 799 daily trips. The project will generate 69 two-way trips in the a.m. peak hour (7 to 9 a.m.) and 82 two-way trips in the p.m. peak hour (4 to 6 p.m.), both significantly less than the 250 two way trips which would trigger a Traffic Impact Analysis required under the County's Congestion Management Program. The project proposes two ingress/egress points. The point along Grove Avenue is full access for all users and tenants in both the residential portion and the office portion. The point along Red Hill Country Club Drive is for emergency access only and will be gate-protected for that purpose. The traffic generated by the project will access the site primarily through the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue. The daily trips and the peak hour trips will not increase the Level of Service (LOS) grade beyond the acceptable P174 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00223/DRC2006-00350/DRC2007-00029/DRC2006-00341/SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC September 19, 2007 Page 7 LOS C that it operates under today. Based on the analysis of City-generated thresholds of significance, the increase by 0.2 seconds of delay per vehicle at this intersection is not significant. Substantial concern has been voiced over the traffic impact of the project on trips that will use the local residential streets on Red Hill County Club Drive to shortcut up or down from Base Line Road. The traffic analysis, based on industry standards, City-generated traffic counts from April 2006 and other information provided by the City's Traffic Engineer, shows that the project will generate an additional four a.m. peak-hour trips and zero p.m. peak-hour trips with a total daily traffic increase of 0.6 percent over current levels. Part of these numbers are based on the Central School District information that the district anticipates the project to generate approximately 17 (total) children (K-8), some of whom will attend Valle Vista School on Red Hill County Club Drive. Based on current information on the Central School District website (attached), enrollment for this school site is projected to drop. The applicant instructed their traffic engineers to prepare analysis of alternate development scenarios as part of their study to demonstrate the minimal effect of the current proposal. The alternate development scenarios are based on the broad range of possibilities permitted within the mix of uses anticipated in the General Plan. The following chart shows the current proposal and three alternate development scenarios: Land Use Mix Daily Trips Percentage Higher than Current Proposal Current Proposal ,"c a '~ . 23 single-family residences, 75 town 799 homes, 12,610 square foot general office building Ciarrenf proposal with medical. office , 23 single-family residences, 75 town 1,130 41.4 percent homes, 12,610 square foot medical office Large Retail Center. 95,000 square foot shopping center, 4,105 4137.6 percent 25 town homes Large Medical Office 180,000 square foot medical office, 6,541 7186.4 percent 4 single-family residences P175 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00223/DRC2006-00350/DRC2007-00029/DRC2006-00341/SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC September 19, 2007 Page 8 The subject proposal would generate a much lower traffic burden on the neighboring streets than an office-heavy scenario or retail-heavy scenario apparently encouraged by the General Plan. Traffic impacts were the overarching concern voiced at the neighborhood meetings and at the Planning Commission hearing. Various qualitative questions were posed by neighbors including driveway line-of-sight, downhill speed, and driveway alignment and distance. The Engineering and Planning staff provided substantial answers to the satisfaction of the Planning Commission. The Upland residents in attendance posed questions that were directed toward impacts in that City. Staff has discussed these concerns with the traffic engineer for the City of Upland. The City of Upland engineer indicated that they have no significant concerns about the traffic generated by this project. Just prior to the Planning Commission meeting, the City of Rancho Cucamonga received a letter from Upland Development Services and the three minor issues were addressed to the satisfaction of the Planning Commission. (See the letter and response attached Exhibit Y). Based on the comments made by nearby residents independent of the perceived project impacts, it appears that the existing traffic conditions are causing concerns rather than the potential impacts from the subject project. All studies, statistics, and reporting describe the traffic generated by the subject project as not significant. Therefore, rather than using this project, the primary attention should be placed on addressing existing conditions as the neighborhood's solution. To that end, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department is currently conducting the Red Hill Neighborhood Traffic Study which is designed to address these concerns. The study is based on a variety of solution alternatives (traffic diversion, traffic calming, etc.) and the direct input of the neighbors at neighborhood meetings and with a neighborhood survey. Based on the most recent meeting, the neighborhood agreed that the survey-identified stop sign and speed bumps presented were the most suitable remedies. If the current plan is eventually adopted, the traffic path mentioned the most by residents in relationship to the subject project will have an additional six stop signs and two speed bumps to calm the traffic in the neighborhood. 2. Land Use Designation General Plan Amendment/Development District Amendment -The bulk of the subject site (approximately 9.07 of the 10.1 acre total) is designated Mixed Use on the Land Use Plan of the General Plan and zoned in the Mixed Use district on the District (Zoning) Map. The four additional parcels on the easterly portion of the site have been under common ownership (San Antonio Hospital) for some years. These parcels are designated Open Space on the Land Use Plan of the General Plan and zoned Low Residential (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) on the Zoning Map. The request is to amend the Land Use Plan and the Zoning Map for these four parcels, respectively, to a Mixed Use designation and the Mixed Use District to be consistent with both the general scope of the surrounding area and the project. The existing Low Residential (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) Development District for these four parcels is not consistent with the existing Open Space Land Use designation. California Government Code Section 65860 requires that zoning be consistent with the General Plan. The description of the Open Space designation in Section 2.5.4.2 of the P176 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00223/DRC2006-00350/DRC2007-00029/DRC2006-00341/SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC September 19, 2007 Page 9 General Plan does not contain provisions for any residential uses and has an explicit limitation on density with a range from zero dwelling units per acre up to only 0.1. The Open Space designation must be changed to remove this inconsistency, and the Mixed Use designation is the most appropriate because of the surrounding designations and development. The requested change would also place these four parcels into Foothill Boulevard Districts Subarea 1 and make them a part of the Westem Gate in the Bear Gulch Area found in Section 2.5.5.4 of the General Plan. One question directed at the Planning Commission was whether the City has "controlled growth" and the implications of this project on that control. City Attorney, Jim Markman, gave a substantial answer that satisfied the Planning Commission. In essence, an owner's property rights are only limited by a few government powers. One of those is the police power of zoning. Every municipal jurisdiction in California has a General Plan and zoning which provide controls on growth. For the subject projedt, the applicant is exercising the right to ask to change the controls in a way that does not increase growth. The project does not take advantage of substantially higher growth-impacting controls that the Planning Commission could have acted upon without City Council action. The Planning Commission agreed that this project produces a lower level of impacts. 3. Mixed Use -The General Plan designates large portions of the western end of Foothill Boulevard as Mixed Use, including the subject site. This area is known alternately in various official documents as the Western Foothill Corridor -Western Gateway and as Bear Gulch. The discussion for this area in the General Plan focuses on the mix of uses anticipated based on the location, the anticipated uses, the then-current level of commercial vitality, and the types of activity expected to occur there. The General Plan text provides the fundamental rationale and policy direction for the mix of uses both anticipated and planned for this area. The mix of uses is shown in the following table found in the General Plan on Page III-41: TABLE III-7 WESTERN FOOTHILL CORRIDOR -WESTERN GATEWAY ' ,','. Land Use :`: Percent°~" •3 ' Average Dgnsity ~ Estimated ,, r~ Ran a 9 • Most Case - ,, "~ ~~ ,, ;" •- 'Dwelling Unds (du%acre) ~; ~ x ,,, ,.. ~ Commercial -retail, service 50 percent to 27.5 to 38.5 acres 38.5 acres Commercial -tourist commercial; 70 percent office (commercial and rofessional P177 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00223/DRC2006-00350/DRC2007-00029/DRC2006-00341/SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC September 19, 2007 Page 10 Residential 30 percent to 16.5 to 27.5 acres @ 16.5 acres @ 50 percent 14 dwelling units per acre' 14 dwelling units 231 to 385 dwelling units peracre' 231 dwelling units TOTALS 100 percent 55 acres 55 acres ' Indicates target density not a range. Actual density may increase up to 20 dwelling units per acre as long as the total of 231 dwelling units is not exceeded. This table is based on the rationale of this General Plan section and its mix is skewed toward commercial uses rather than residential. In addition, the broad ranges in the land use categories that were targeted for this area are noted in the General Plan to: allow a high degree of flexibility and responsiveness to the market and to achieve a sustainable economic vitality." The implication in the General Plan, then, is that this mix of uses is the one that best responds to the market. The applicant contends that the market is such that skewing their project to the most residentially heavy side of these ranges is still far from what the market will accept and has been this way for some time. Retail uses are not viable for this location considering the nearby vacancies both in Rancho Cucamonga and Upland. In fact, it would be prudent to increase the mix of multi-family residential uses in this area in order to fulfill the General Plan intention to energize the district during the day and evening business hours and thus to provide the necessary vigor to the district. The applicant also has shown that if the site was developed within the General Plan ranges, the traffic impacts would be too severe to be acceptable to the neighbors and to the City. The applicant's proposal is to expand the explicit flexibility of the range of the mix of uses for the area to allow up to 87 percent of the mix to be residential. This request does not include an increase in the permitted residential density for the project site which is proposed to remain at up to 20 dwelling units per acre (Section 17.32.020.0.3, Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code [RCMC]). And, since the applicant must file a Master Plan, the proposed 11.2 dwelling units per acre density cannot be exceeded on this site. Density was an issue raised at the neighborhood meetings. Only a partial understanding of the permitted density lies in Table III-7, shown above. The pivotal feature in Table III-7 is the Percent Range column, not the two density-related columns on the right. The several tables used to define the different Mixed Use areas do not incorporate a permitted density range but a range in the mix of uses permitted. The target density shown in the table is used to demonstrate the result of the range in the mix of uses which was necessary for other General Plan-based analysis. While the Most Case column shows an example with 231 units for the area, a Least Case column could very well be included which demonstrates that 385 units would fit in the area -and that only based on the target density, not the maximum. The two regulations that define how much residential is permitted are the permitted density range (up to 20 dwelling units per acre (Section 17.32.020.0.3, RCMC) and the Percent Range column in Table III-7. A broader discussion of the problem of regulating residential density and commercial intensity in a Mixed Use setting should illuminate the reason for using both the broad P178 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00223/DRC2006-00350/DRC2007-00029/DRC2006-00341/SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC September 19, 2007 Page 11 density range definition in General Plan Section 2.5.5.4 and Chapter 17.32 (RCMC) and a range for each of the uses included in the mix of uses in a discretionary Master Planning situation. There are two issues: one of true use mixture and the other of understanding vertical and horizontal segregation. Orthodox zoning is the segregating of relatively similar and compatible land uses into horizontally-defined districts or zones. In a Mixed Use zone, the point is at least partially to break down the traditional constrictions of orthodox zoning by allowing uses to be intermingled on a single site or within a single building. The problem with encouraging this intermingling is that some regulatory standard is needed to keep the uses from producing undesirable incompatibilities usually solved through strict segregation. With this intermingling in mind, any meaningful segregation of uses must be dealt with both horizontally and vertically. When confronted with uses that are likely to be intermingled on a single site, does one set a density standard that covers the entire acreage of the site or only where the use is placed on the site? Can setting a maximum amount of the site used by one of the uses meet the intention of the Mixed Use zone? Can a standard be set that placed certain uses vertically that furthers that intention? The choice of regulatory methods to use for the Mixed Use areas in Rancho Cucamonga is to provide a range for each use in the mixture, use a broad density range for the residential portion, set no limit on the floor area of the commercial portion other than whether enough parking is provided, and to provide discretionary review for each situation on a case-by-case basis to ensure that the intention of that Mixed Use area is met. As the intention of this Mixed Use area, essentially, is to overcome its inability "to compete successfully in the market place," achieve "a dynamic entrance to the City," generate investment interest in this area, provide a significant example of the historic Route 66 theme, and to achieve a sustainable economic vitality," then the proposed project with the requested amendments meets those General Plan goals and objectives. Master Planning -The General Plan and the Development Code both address the use of a Master Plan Overlay District as a way to attend to the unique and special characteristics of a development site to solve problems and address issues that may not be readily resolved through conventional zoning designations or site development standards. (Section 111.2.4.1, Rancho Cucamonga General Plan) As a special consideration for projects within the Foothill Boulevard Mixed Use District, a Master Plan is required and must follow the requirements for a Master Plan Overlay District designation in the General Plan and in Section 17.20.030 of the Development Code. This requirement is significant for this project in two ways: a. The Master Plan must be submitted and reviewed at the same time as the development application. This allows for comprehensive design and environmental review; and b. The Master Plan Overlay District designation locks the project and all its development parameters (density, parking, etc.) into the General Plan and prevents major changes to the development at a future date. This gives further assurance P179 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00223/DRC2006-00350/DRC2007-00029/DRC2006-00341/SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC September 19, 2007 Page 12 that the maximum density of 20 dwelling units per acre cannot be realized as the project would then be set at the Master Plan Overlay District level as approved, in this case 11.2. As a consequence of the intent of the Master Plan process, the proposed project is designed to seamlessly blend the several use types together while allowing for sufficient segregation to prevent any incompatibilities. In doing so, the applicant has been able to meet most of the development standards for the applicable uses. However, the applicant is proposing that several development standards be relaxed in order to provide a better site design. As provided on a comprehensive comparison table (attached), the applicant is requesting the following: • Average setbacks be allowed in lieu of the required discreet setback calculation for units along Red Hill Country Club Drive and the office building at the corner. • Height limit setback for the office building in the Foothill Boulevard District Parkway designation to be reduced along both Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue with an overall height of 40 feet. • The private open space requirement for the town homes and live/work units to be relaxed to allow an average calculation for the units on the ground floor and allow the upstairs space to be counted. • That the building separation measurement between the town home buildings and the driveway curb be reduced to 11 feet for both two- and three-story portions of the town home buildings. The applicant justifies the reduced setbacks, reduced separation from the driveway curbs, and the reduced ground floor open space for the town homes by explaining that the town home clusters allow a better layout design for the site. By affecting clusters of town homes, a more autonomous relationship is made for each cluster and additional open space that is not measured by the Code minimum requirements is provided in more meaningful locations, not only in the large common open space areas, but also in the court spaces enveloped within each town home cluster. The applicant also justifies the flexibility for the office building by noting that the siting of the building meets the overarching intent of the Foothill Boulevard-Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan (VIP). This plan specifies the design requirements for the entry gateways to the City on Foothill Boulevard, including various street furniture and other accents. For the Western Gateway at Grove Avenue, the plan states that this intersection should incorporate large accent setbacks (Section III.A). The office building design provides a symmetrical L-shaped arrangement with an attractive entry toward the corner that is set back a significant distance. However, by locating and arranging the building on the site to achieve the requirements of the VIP, it does require that some of the P180 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00223/DRC2006-00350/DRC2007-00029/DRC2006-00341/SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC September 19, 2007 Page 13 development standards be relaxed. The Design Review Committee recommended the increased height to better affect the intention of the VIP. The Master Plan Overlay District directs that such flexibility be allowed and the applicant's proposal requests these variations solely in response to design-related needs. D. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee reviewed the project on two occasions. On March 20, 2007, the Committee accepted the conclusions of the traffic study and focused primarily on the architectural design of the project. Additional exhibits were requested and substantial improvement on the corner treatment of the office building was required to better meet the Foothill Boulevard VIP requirements. One request was to increase the height of the corner tower element beyond the height limit as allowed under the Master Plan. The Committee also required that the office parking lot be able to be used by the residents during off hours and that restrictions on the type of uses allowed in the live/work units be laid out. One traffic related request the Committee made was that a protected left-turn arrow be added to the intersection for southbound Grove Avenue traffic. On the subsequent review at the May 1, 2007, meeting, staff informed the Committee that the left-turn arrow request can be made a Condition of Approval, however, since CalTrans has jurisdiction over the intersection, they will need to approve the traffic warrants necessary to include the protected arrow. The applicant provided the parking allowance and use restriction documents as well as additional section and elevation exhibits. The elevations and renderings for the office building were admired for the improvements and the Committee added recommended conditions regarding attractive security measures at the front door and restrictions on the eventual signage. The Committee concluded by stating that the rest of the Planning Commission, the City Council, and the public may be unable to properly visualize the layout of the project and would recommend that the applicant produce athree-dimensional computer generated motion picture that takes the viewer through the project to better picture the spaces within the project and the relationship between the buildings on the site. The Committee recommended approval of the project. E. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project and recommended approval of the project. Neighborhood Meetings: In response to the overwhelming interest in the project, the City Council required that this applicant provide a notification list out to a 2,000-foot radius. The applicant complied and used this same list to notify the property owners of their neighborhood meetings. Splitting up the hundreds of names, the applicant held three separate neighborhood meetings on March 6, March 8, and March 12, 2007 (Exhibit P). The primary issue of concern was traffic impacts, mostly Red Hill County Club Drive cut through traffic and Grove Avenue impacts. The applicant had their traffic engineer present at the third meeting to better explain the standard methodology used. The discussion of density was always as a corollary to the traffic concern. The applicant was cordially responsive to comments. A member of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department staff was in attendance at each of the three meetings as a monitor. All questions personally directed to Planning Staff were answered on a one-on-one basis as P181 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00223/DRC2006-00350/DRC2007-00029/DRC2006-00341/SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC September 19, 2007 Page 14 staff is a guest at these meetings. Attendees also included members of the City of Upland Planning Department staff and senior management of San Antonio Hospital, the property owner. G. Tribal Consultation Notification: In compliance with SB18, staff made the required inquiries with the California's Native American Heritage Commission and the tribes thereby identified for consultation on the requested General Plan Amendment. No responses for consultation were received. H. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology. and soils, hydrology and water quality, and noise, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. As a pro-active response to advisory comments on other similar projects in Rancho Cucamonga by the South Coast Air Quality Management District regarding the use of updated air quality models and other measures introduced this year, the applicant had the attached Supplemental Air Quality Evaluation based on these comments prepared for staff review. Staff has concluded that based on this report and the updated measurements, that there is no change to the air quality significance conclusions reached based on the original air quality document. CORRESPONDENCE & NOTIFICATION: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 2,000-foot radius of the project site. (In response to the interest in the project, the City Council required that this applicant provide a notification list out to a 2,000 foot radius from the project site in lieu of the minimum of 660 feet normally required.) Also, in accordance with California Government Code Section 65352(b), the tribes identified by the Native American Heritage Commission on the consultation list received by the Planning Department dated April 21, 2006 were notified of the public hearing for consideration of the General Plan Amendment no less than 45 days prior to the hearing for comment CONCLUSION: The applicant's proposal has substantial merit for the location, the surrounding community and for its minimal impact on adjacent properties with regards to traffic, visual qualities, and low land use intensity. The proposed amendments are generally minor and facilitate development of this property with the lowest intensity land use while still maintaining the goals and policies for Mixed Use found in the General Plan. The appeal of the Planning Commission approvals for the Development Review and Tract Map cases are provided with no justifications and the contention that the traffic impacts and the land use density are inappropriate for this site is without merit. P182 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00223/DRC2006-00350/DRC2007-00029/DRC2006-00341/SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC September 19, 2007 Page 15 Respectfully submitted, ~ ~~ /~R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT:VP/ge Attachments: Exhibit A -Tentative Tract Map Exhibit B -Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit C -Site Plan Exhibit D -Site Sections Exhibit E -Fire Department Access Plan Exhibit F -Open Space Plan Exhibit G -Office Elevations and Floor Plans Exhibit H -Single-Family Elevations and Floor Plans Exhibit I - Live/Work Cluster Elevations and Floor Plans Exhibit J -Town home Elevations and Floor Plans Exhibit K -Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit L -Master Plan Comparison Chart and Narrative Exhibit M -General Plan Section 2.5.5.4 Bear Gulch narrative Exhibit N -Proposed Reciprocal Parking Declaration Exhibit O -Proposed Use Restriction Declaration Exhibit P -Applicant Neighbor Outreach Summary dated May 29, 2007 Exhibit O -Applicant Neighborhood Meetings Report dated April 19, 2007 Exhibit R -Applicant Neighborhood Meeting Attendance Roster Exhibit S -Neighbor letters Exhibit T -Design Review Committee Action Agenda Dated March 20, 2007 Exhibit U -Design Review Committee Action Agenda Dated May 1, 2007 Exhibit V -Traffic Daily Trip Generation Chart Exhibit W -Traffic Study Exhibit X -Valle Vista Elementary School Enrollment Projections Exhibit Y -City of Upland Letter and Engineering Department response Exhibit Z -Red Hill Neighborhood Traffic Study Survey and Plan Exhibit AA -Supplemental Air Quality Evaluation Exhibit AB -Appeal letter and 30-day waiver letters Exhibit AC -Computer-Generated Motion Picture -under separate cover Exhibit AD -Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223 Draft Ordinance Approving Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350 Draft Ordinance Approving Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2006-00341 r g 6 ~i 1 f 's PQ ~g~ !, oa~tf ~' g `g ~ e t 1 ~ s s3 : 3 ~ ! .~ ~=~i d d Q Y6 Ped Pia a~f aifi~~:q i I e ~ f ~ 3e S9Y~3q! P~~ Pi:l~! ~l9 iQY~~~'v @l~i~Al~iel~ ~4Y c: ~ __ ~S~3A ~~I~E u Q.y d ra~m~ ~I I a o °= w~~Yo ~o~~~ o m t o ~ mi5 99 iq' d ,P } M~ y ~' !. ~ =1 ~°~I'E! ~a., ®P3SI ~ 83 EXHIBIT A _______~._._. O~MONOA OJ r I. c b y0 ALIO ~ ',: ~, ~~ ~I \'~ s s as ~. . ,ria~pi~pil~ii ,, pd - ~. e; arlglllEolEi~l(§! ~ E I I i. ' ^, r .: ~i ~~ ,J, ,~A~'. i ~`X ,I': y ur d ~ o ~.~ I~ ~ : K ` ~ l~ ~ Z \ ~ ~ ~ ~~\ . l A ~ ma.. q ~\ ~ ~ 4 U.. ~ w ,3 r° ~~ ~ ~ o~ . a I ~ ~~ ~~ ~, ~~ ~ } tt ~ G ~ ~ ~~ p ~ d n i D ' ~3 ~•~ , ~ ~ y . I T 1 I I ~ 3r ~ ' ill ~ ~ ~.,r { I ;. ~ ~ b~ , ~ _i ~ ~~ ~ ( ,,~ ~ i , ~~ ~ ~ i~~ , ~ .: I ru ~ % I ~ i II F ~ Fc ~ I _ ~ ' /•i 5 y3~ .r ~~ ~ }I a ~ f _ , T, ~ i ~' 's .~ ~ . S ~'9 ~' `\ 1 IY -aB i:~ {~ v ,C. ,` ' '1-~~ - ~ ~ ~ \7 I d$~ f-~ ~ y8 . 4 ~3~4 ~~ L ~ 1 I ~ ~~ 1 ~4 ~ _ ~ ~~ $ ~ d _ x e ~i I le e ~r~ ~ I L i ~ ~ifl ~ ~ ~ C 2i .,~ ~. ¢ ----- j ~ .~ ~~ ~ a ~____- ~~ I ,~ om = ,:. ~ /;~~ ,~30N3Atl 3AOtl'J ~' ~ 5 !' , ~ '~ pd ~g~i,gl ~y{ I h J l i EXHIBIT B ... .I ~____.______,~_~_a. 84 00 pMONOA 5~ a a~ ~P1 O b p ~. ~ . v i wg v ~~ M:il,~ d ~ ~ m <~~ , ~~1i a0 AllO g mQ~ u:i'i s ~ ~ ~iaL e ~ o ~ m~ ' ~ g~ el e a 6 d ._.. -_.. _._ -nnr v I _ I_I I° I __!_ I _-_ ~__i __Le I I ~ I B I I I' I I ! W g~~ I - I Q i I" ,-~ I U I ~ _~ ~ w a B ~~ , g~ I C I r . _.. ~- .~e. _.. ~ C I i -i .v ''. ! I vxr a -- i _ e' I ~ I_'e~rc @ ~ Q~'° a t~ 3' s . I_ ~_ _ y Ili I - -- - '-I~ ~ -..ar _ P ~-. ~ .. __.exur' Q I ___ _ ~ v ^ I ~ ' I_ I_ _ ; _ I I _nn ~ . d s I I gi I I ~ I I I~ B ~ ~ I B -J ' I BO .~ ~ - o a ~ 1~ m- - y~ ~ x a -, t I °a e - I m ~ ~ ~ _-~ V ..... _ .. _._._ - ~ ~'ye ~...__~.__ ~ .. .e~ ' ` ru~..AF i. i.. g L...ewe-'iZ i- ' B~. W Q I W ~ e '= I -~ i ~ ~ ~ e~ _.._ _ .I0. awl i I° ~ t ~B;el ~_ ~ I I~ B ...._ ... ~. .~..... ~ i 5 ~ .e,- y lQ~ I I I e.W I I al € ~,- I .I ~ e . L ~ - .. ~ II B ~ __.. ( ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ..e.~~. L. I O~ '' I I I I ~ I Ie~" ~5g 1 l J o .L~_~ I ! ~ ~ a _.%. I . .`.. B IP~-e1 B ~_~ i ~..,L' ~' j i no~~A Z I ~.u I V y~ I I N I r' I ~°'~e ~ .~ I ~,B I', 6= q I 9 p' ,i-e:u'-: ~ •~ i ,- ®~ 8;-g 85 - i I ---1-'--!--I-- ~~) m;, - ~I ~ ~ m f I-- .~-i ~ p.. ~ ,--„; ~t-f--- --~-- - --- i ~~~ ~~~ SECTION G-G ~_ ~ _ tram ~m Jw.S}A~~I::axS.TRN~EM1MpVwt RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE GROVE AVENUE ,>, I FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SECTION H-H SECTION F-F T sn I I I ~~ c. fiige ~`s9 s' ~~:~ =~~~P - @@ ~ a ? ~ dP187 g p 55 s ~94 t ~ 3 ~te` i-~8~ a~~ p s i ~ r ~ ~ p €'v ¢'f3 j ccii F S ~i ' ~ 9 ~~ .3 ii ... e,_ ~ ~ J: E tt ~ F!F BBB ~ ~P ;i33 p@333: ~Pi d ~~ n m~ E~~p~~ iiii ~ iiii p~~ i . 3 @@ i ~ - ~i Z m5 ~~ 39Sei pp ~ pi~ei .:i:3 ~3 iiiiS ~}:S ~, s~F3 ~~~ 1g Bj~~ g ~~ ~ W o$dr §g o;yz? ~~ ~:~ ~9{ 5 ea€itti s'~€iiiis ~€ia°. a@3e Pi9€~ E~s~~s ... , ~3 .i (n ¢d°a4a`a! 4~d _ r ~~ i' e P $}yj yp\ ./. A ~ fl .. ~ i i i i r ~ €et; ~ee 33 i(( e 3 € ~ € t@tt....y :^,t.R~?-......._, :: _a = :1 ,_€} ~ ~ ~ 6 e ~~1: 3d E °' J . E. = I s .__... ~ ..a • ___.._ ___ -. 1 @3 ' _ ______Y' _ _____L __p __v L~ ,I ' - ' :~~ 3Q '! e •~ 0 JL.I y C' ~ ~€` _ a ~~ a ~~~ J ..q ......@3.. i..... ~I~ ffi ~6 V .~1 ~'I i / 1 ~~ EXHIBIT C ~~ ,~ ..,~I I I , I __I~` i Iii ? i ~I ~~~ ~ dl; , . `1 i~' ~ ~ r ~'f ~'r 9 ~_ QP188 e a Z U3 ~ ~a~~~ a ~ ~~ s°as m U ~b v_ ~ ~=pa 3ASai ° ~ ° ~ W ¢ [n m ¢ $ m ~^~ W ~ m F~ gy 9. 3 nge uJ a`S9 n' ~al. 4 ~, @~a a s e yR ~q 9 e EXHIBIT D U C) U N Z O F U w N W W Z O F U w N LL LL . O U S N Z O F U w N I Z O F U w N 9 ~ ~3 z J b~ O O: U sa ,~ W Q Q ~ m mj W N$$G py ~/+ p a E n?pe ~ ¢i~ §a@S ~: ~ F189 ~~~i9 ;?~ti~ @~p~ M~~ 6 x 6 e A n e y Z O F U w N gg ~::: ' ~ 1 ~:i f! ] 6d8iv ? 8 8 i !€ 0 ~ .,:; ; r is ~ . l - ;; ¢~:~ ~ ~ .n ,, ea-, €€€ .. ~ pE aand p d'edi 88 a ='• i ( yyy2 iiii 4~ ~~~i ~~ ° ~ ~ ~ iiF~ ! p! 8 ~ 8~ e.ea 8~~...a ~~.. ~a qs p~ff s 3 !SI € 1;i ~e f'e :iii ~€ iiii ° I ~ ~ 44a 3t~~ ~ 6i66 ttit i i s s'1 ~~'i~d ~~~3~a~ ~~€....'t'i€...6 ~€,€: ~3~~. c _ _ I_i91.k1 __ J"' _ i III 1 I I _ - I~ \ ~ . a ii _ _ _ i I _ 11, `l Ii L a lIl - ~ ~ (}pt4 °x11 - l.ix~ I ~- E ~~~ ~,~t~ ~_ c ~ ~ ~ 111 Ij fi ner~:r~m==a -? ~ 1. EXHIBIT E QP190 U o9 E C) ~G $ a s m5 d a 0. ' ff ~n 3asyg 4 W ¢ ~ m o , ~. 'm~ d ~~ 2 ogggg pp o W Q7 °~5 Qi: ~ ~3 \ 6 Q74 ,~ a a € il 9i ~ / A A ~, ~ e ~I~-I'I'fl II I I _._ /~ ;, / t ` r~ _' I I l~ L~ ~.h ~~ ~ ~ aE`~" ~ 99 I i is di =f ~°y ~I B€II i R ~{I g° g ~ ~ aP191 ~ a ~ ~ Q~ m~ ep= g ~ $ ~ ~ ¢S ¢°j ~~€g § f~ ~ ~~ ~ ~e~ ~ ~ wN9e ~~ ~_ S ~ ~ @ do o ® a~ °a ~~ O a; o ~ s ~g s 8 4 gR A i e EX m w ELEVATION A (Foothill BtvtlJ +'_ 1 0 4 ELEVATION KEY ELEVATION B (Grove AveJ ~•4 side elev. Iront elev. ~ Y S e Y Y " sitle elev. rear elev. TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATIONS OFFICE Arbors el Route 66 Arbors at Route 66, LLC u~a=s.~o .o-...,~:.~Ua~u wimaa nneiooim nmxbcm, ua ..o~n:~~a.e ~~I-~~-~ e e a r s 'E °in'°m' P~ CD N QP193 mR61~ ~ ~,,. £~Eoo iab.p ~'fi ~Q~ 4~a mm p II7~ ~z g ~e m 00 z ELEVATION B ELEVATION D 0 ELEVATION KEV 4 ELEVATION C ELEVATIONS SF-1 A SINGLE FAMILY a Arbors enr~ROGta 66 Arbors at Route 66, LLC 1 1 1/',( Wllt~ee M h.olm A.CV~..4~LLP r I r ~ IV l YVJl y ~.~Jt s~ y, m re A-R ~ + CO m z tO > o ~ ~Q3 Q LL _ m J ~ QC J Zn~ R( w~,a ~~ ~e ~5g m° m~ o' ~g m ~O~ n-i ~dg: QP195 ~8~+p9 •?~ spa p ba Y e ~~~i~ _? ~va 3:., ~ 3 a Y Z O Q J W 0 z 0 a J W O c ~.. ~ ...._ ~ ^ ~~ . I ---- rNs 'a . ...~ ^ '`~ 4 t 4 ~`- 4 ~ i svE.uo ~...~•.. O O _ I -- - ' ~y . ~-i (~ ~ I ' .o.o; ~ I i i ~ ow.tw.. q . 0 _ A..,..,,o ji ~.q M rorn~aaoss naen: UNIT PLAN SF-7 A/1 B t586 S. F. SINGLE FAMLV Torsi NEr nRFJ.: 3 BEDROOM - 2 BAiH LSW S.F. Arbors a ROUta 66 ~ tai aF. - FoancH o g Arbors al Route 66, LLC ~o..,.a ....,~. . oiaz+~o . IwIT Ntltixla M W1 . LL{~ ~ VV1 1 1 09t re >,..m A-10 ~ + ELEVATION B ELEVATION D 0 ELEVATION C ELEVATIONS SF-2A SINGLE FAMILY Air abOrs ao~RO~te 68 Arbors at Route 66, LLC ELEVATION KEY 4 1 ,/'j WIIPBBCMeI~001m N01vleCb. W f-~-~ ~rl a~q:rte I~ ~ ~~6 rt ov~rmr P-~ ~ ° ~ + 1 V aR059 ARFA: LEVEL OI-1,1 <3SF. LEVEL 02 -1,229 5 F. TOTAL eFOSS'. 2 ~]2 5 i. NEf AREA: LEVEL 01 - IP555 F'. LEVEL OT -1 16~ S F. TOTAL NEr: 2 219 5 F. PATIO - T<2 5 F. UNIT PLAN SF-2A SINGLE FAMILV 3 BEDROOM + DEN, 2.5 BATH Arbors at Route 66 Arbors at Route 66, LlC I 1 // ~IIMe}Mgalcak,l AfdN%b. LL- -o + U a w w 4 a W Y Z O F w Q O Z O F w J W ~ aP199 m N 6 ~_ J jS ~~ 2~ 1 Q Q~ Q w m y Ne ~ V6 ~ 8 J y ~ Wogg JZn c ` j mE o, n.~ ` 5 p8 5 •f2 4 c ~ w m a !S a na a R n el d e .. 5 i .+ J w 33pp igg~ ___._______ F_ ___ 0 ~., ~ { .~ ~ Ij( ~ I t . i - x1 i g i ~ i ~ ~ ~ ----- ~~ ------iiii ; i a ,~~1I~~~~~i ie £~ 11Tf'I ( = t ~, ~+ ~ y ~r € I ~ 1 ... a I .~1 ~ ~• 1 ~~~.I gg ~ l~aa 1 F _~. r~, ~ -- ® s Y yy 6 i y:., gf _ _ ,.- N p. }., F,,.. ~ w J ~4~~x4-~- ~~ ~ O~- ~•- _ f . r ~ Q t 7 i ^ ° ~~ S - s ; 6 __ _$~_ T S ~ _~I® n~ ~_ J ~ QP200 a m m 9 N i n U' 3 `~ o ~ ~~ E~@9~ Z ~ ~ g m: ~'Faa g ~ ~ o~ o; ;.s,, a LL $ ~~ m1 ~ ~'~ {- j ~ N G Yi ~ ~ ~4 e~€ Z (7W Z m Mme O n E ¢`~~ o. n- ¢`fla p ~, yy PSA3 NNN NN ~vn ~ ~Sn _n g s '~ . ~~~ o )? ug7'J~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~ e o ~ i ~ ~ ~.. -- ~ :¢ ~"t - _ _- _ ~ ay •F~3 Y ~ _ l =p'; ELEVATION B ELEVATION C ELEVATION E ELEVATION O ELEVATION F LW- ELEVATIONS LIVE WORK CLUSTER Arµ~rs a~gROGte 66 Arbors at Route 66, LLC 0 ~',(' WiIgpBCCM e~I 'CCIm NCiilocb. LLP IIVyIVIYr I/ ~+SP~9a m e P~4e~raa N O tLt V H 1 IUIV H 4 ELEVATION KEV LEVEL 03 LEVEL 02 LW -BUILDING PLANS LIVE WORK CLUSTER Arbors el Rowe 66 Arbors el Rowe 66, LLC a~a..i.:o~..a..~.~~z waa e~w ,~,/ wi~.'.a'~a~im n~duacn. un IVIfITr lr uO~ga~.om ore onr~mr A-16 ~ + N O N i ..,1 LEVEL 3 r + Mme. 1_I II r ef -_ . ~~_ I ~ I .......~ ~ =. _. ;; t i I ~;_I_, i. I-. r ..~ LEVEL 2 GROSS 9REn: LEVEL 01 -SISSF LEVEL 02 - 0<a s F LEVEL 03-54] 5 F ioTU aROSS. z.ao9 sF. NEf PA EI: LEVEL BI - aea 5 F. LEVEL 02- B]8 B E LEVEL 03 - 5005 f. tOinL NET. 1,9a2 5 F. 192 5 F. - PRNAiE OPEN SPACE LEVEL 1 UNIT PLAN LW-1 LIVE WORK 3 BEDROOM - 4 BATH Arborsrs a~^ROGte 66 Arbors ai Route 66, LLC ' , '•/ YIIPM1ap Me~PVIm Ntltilec6, LLP ~s re o~,,~, A- ~ N+ O W m 00 ELEVATION D ELEVATION F ELEVATION B ELEVATION C ELEVATION E MF- ELEVATIONS MULT-FAMILV CLUSTER Ar~baors a°~wROUte 66 (~ Arbors at Route 66, LLC r~oy.,®o .......,:.pe..~..~.. 4c f/ Wlllrep Me4nlT ArgN b,LLP ELEVATION KEV ~~ °'°'^~ 19'41-~~ A_,° a ~p,~ ~ + N O A ~ QP205 ~ g~ ~~ a ~ U J3 J QP 3E y {p9g ~ pp N' qG F~ ~ N J u ~ y ~ pp ~ - 3 ~ J ¢° ; 2 gSii m g 96 k_ 4 ~ ~ <d~ a9; ~a a 9 4 g` e fie Y U w ~r ~ rO I °¢ Q Oei~ - ~..~_, l~ '.. ~, ~ __~~ ~. G ~~i T : rt (, ~ k II I ® ~t l i y _ L_ ~'L _ry H+ r ~ m LL Z W Z ° W g ao$ ~ Z O Z3m ~~~ B Us J~ tea. m m: ~5 0 0 oa ~ ~g m 'm a Q~g ~¢ti ~ q $ ~G~~C E tl$:. $~~ao ~ A.'. °x ~~ ~~ NN LLNN N ,gq, ,_ ~~ <w~7o ~~~~ gg o~ o ~J ~ ~ J~ ~P206 ~4F ~4~ Q8o ~~ e .~ ,.« ~. 3 s - ___ 0~1 v 1~1 1 T e~yrv ,nBMV ~iMd'~'• rIC{ u Y ® ® .rn.i~ .- re_.^ •a .,+ LEVEL 2 -., .~, ., ~.~ ~±-E a-- ~ ~ I { ~ ~ i , ~"> r ~ r ~V 1 I ~T J't _ ' ' II ~ I J i_t.i _ O O I~ j-i i il~A~ii li mcva__ .~ -x LEVEL 1 pRO$$AREA: LEVEL 01 - R82 s.F. LEVEL 02-BW SF. TOTAL ORO55: I.C62 S F. UNIT PLAN MF-2 TOWNHOME 2 BEDROOM + OEN - 2.5 BATH NET MEI: I.EV6.01 -505 5 F. LEVEl02 - i« 5 F. TOTAL NET: 1,3M19 S F. 155 S.F. - PRNAIE OPEN SPACE Air obors ao~~ROGte 66 Arbors at Roue 66, LLC P~W.us i~.•er ire:. unnuc~u ~~ 41PaRa Me~wlm A, JileCJB, LLP e~ 5 w.,E ,.,,~. A-21 ~ + N O v ~ ~ __ a3 ~ €~` . ~`~ ~ ] D' n ~ ~ ~.-~~_m' I -- -® •~ a LEVEL 3 LEVEL 2 DROSS ~: LEVEL al - a<e s F. LEVEL 42-8]S aF. LEVEL as - aas s F. TOTK diOSS: I,ga9 5 F. NEf NiE/: LEVEL 01-919SF. LEVEL 02 - 821 S F. LEVEL a3-O11 5F. TOTPL NEf: 1.551 S F. LEVEL 1 UNIT PLAN MF-3 TOWNHOME 3 BEDROOM - 3.5 BATH Arbors aI Roufe 66 Arbors at Roule 66, LLC eqa ~m,Wnn.uecue~m 2D0 S F. - PRNPIE CPEN SPrICE t]25.F.-PRIN. OPEN SPACE-PLT DECK ' I I/I'/r~ W~a paMa~colm Ptcllle[b. LLP .c W,.~ A-22 v , e ¢ s ~ + N O 00 ® `a' _i '>. ALT. DECK LEVEL 3 Ir I __ ~I -;s,- ~ .^ _~ ~. I:, _~, ,_ ®~--T~rt LEVEL 2 i ~- ,i ~~ _, ~~ =_==,= ~ _-==--r- Y<.~- ._~_s -- L o = ®- -- a 0 0 LEVEL 1 UNIT PLAN MF-4 ~~~~ LEVEL o~ - aee s F. TOWNHOME LEVEL O2 -eeo s F. 3 BEDROOM + DEN - 3.5 BATH LEVEL 03 -90] 5 F. Torx oNOSS. ~.ss~sF. p Ar ors a ~ RO ~Ie 66 NET PAEn: o ~ aF ^ lEVF101-C2<SF. r LEVF102- 919 5 F. LEVEL 03-3965F. AfbOlS 3I ROOIe 66~LLD TOigL NEI: 1]2]SF. -%~„ra,wnu cro u~avswa 3lB S. F. - RiNAIE OPEN SPME I yllllgp M IT MlyBICb . LLP ~ -D + N O ~~ A ~~~5 ~ fl A8 := ga4 . : s 5 ' 11 "~~ I sS::i. ~ ~ 1 l F_ U ! ~~~ ~ ! , ¢ } ~ ° ^' f 3 ~ . ZS q R ~ am - ~ ~ ~ ~~ s - . 1! ~ z uNi _ ~ I~ , ~~P210 iq{'~' 5 E~~ EXHIBIT K `V~ V O O 3 4 ~ ~ O d V O ~ U aNy ~U- e gay N ° e p a e szo >~as v O aF. a ~ ~ w m Q ~ ti S~F M1 C4 ~i h $~ ~m~ ~~~~ ~~~m PRELIMINARY PLANTING LEGEND Y ~ BO]'.INIL'AL NAM RIP 1 V COMMON NAME ®-nr~ uex~LxsL~ it ifm ® Liax~~ [u.~LSrv ~~ ~~W O ~~o~r.r LarisMMAy M if u. OM x4W~Witi.ry••~ e.omnmiw U ft.s __ e ® =_ _ uL~~~R.RLrve LRwrssR~cLUxx uuuuL~xr.xMlMM wmulu w,w. ' t f ~ I ~ ~ ~1 1DW MFDNN w.U1 Ar iNLRY WIVE 66 `ti, LwxrvMPUURrnArML _L°' ~v v . s~:; d LALUN1e Mxe.~..~E wnN.uwLOws ~,v\~ T r _.~_ IOCFMOMWIFHIAi f Wf111LLYLV0. • /~M.•• us ie i~ois e : :w ...... r . s. ® a.~.. ••.em..e....~... 'P ~w rxsM.a Yrw o,.r ~~ ~w. tiwFl - ..~~ ....r~•...n.. M ~~w 0 - o.r._ e.ee-rae...,. ...... wL-.L:...d r.. ~...~~.....~.. n ., o... ~A.- O a...-.r.~ s uu. F NOTES: ~M uxoeruE MuR ro RE MxuArm xrLx M AlrtarlArx: MRwAmx RrsrMA axPw roAUMnrAeLeco L1cs oRelxMCu •PaoPUnmmzR VMLi ReROVOImuePORAU oaumoM MwYM SHRUR, VINE, ANO GROUND COVER PALETTE ux tvl--~a,....,x.~ ~ -._ ~'w~i~ ~~ s°' iM~ _ x FlUINILLBWLEVMPNISIOUCRW IEMYANMING M[HMAY bCry o- ANfmp xlRgovF/LiFM9LRLC W[Ai If V. LANUSIA r' ` PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 naeoas Arawre se. LLC Foolhi!l Boulevard and Crove Avenue .„~.~~e' -~ LESaL V.m.re elVJ.. swl. no Rancho Cucamonga CA ..~ .M., ErcJrw. CA 91x]9 elo-axsaRA9 SUB7TI8179 AND DRC2006-00341 """".,. SHEET 420F2 SHEETS +` ~~;;x ti , rr = Nmr 1 IWLANUYA W WfilMFNL rn T ArGors at Route GG -Tentative Tract Map 18179 W DEVELOPMENT STANllARD COMPARISON TABLE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICT-SUBAREA 1 April 17, 2007 r SINGLE FAMILY HOMES TOWNHOMES OFFICEICOMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION (LIVE 1 WORK TOWNNOMES) CODE SECTION Development Code Proposal Development Code Proposal Development Code Proposal Minimum Devebpable Area NA 10.1 acres NA 10.1 aces One aae 10.1 acres 17.32.OBO.A.O. d. Minimum Lot Size NA 10.1 aaes NA 10.1 aaes -One acre; 1.17 aaes (50,926 s. f.) 17.32.OBO.A.B. d. - 40,000 s .f. 17.10.040.A Maximum Site Coverage -40%; 31 % (entire site) -40%; 31 % (entire site) 40% 31% (entire site); 17.32.OBO.A.B d. -50% -50% 18%for 08iceJComm. site 17.08.040.8 DUTAae Up to 20 dulac with a 9.7 dWac entire project Up to 20 dulac with a 9.7 dWac entire projeA NA NA 17.32.020.0.3 maximum of 231; target maximum 01231; target (Arbors adds 98 units to the 55 dulac of 14 with a dulac of 14 with a acres in the Western Gateway mazimum of 385. maximum of 385. in the Bear Gulch Area. This would bring the total for the , area to 304 units, still below the pp of 385 units.) Minimum DU Size NA 1596 s. f. NA 1462 s. f. NA NA 17.08.040.8 (zoos a. f .) Minimum Depth NA 70'-99' NA 452' 175' 197' 17.08.040.8 ( 53') 17.10.040A Minimum FrontagelWidN NA 52'-62' 100' 451' 200' 241' 17.08.040.B ( 241') 17.10.040A SETBACKS Foothill Blvd to Building NA NA 45' 73' -The FoothilVGmve ~~- i-Largeaccent setbacks Foothill Blvd-Hislodc ( 54') intersection should ~' ' is "~ have been inmrpomled Route 66 Visual inmrpomte large,accent.,` , including 60'8'bnm orb Improvement Plan IIL A. setbadcs.~ ' to building at (page 9) _ _ -45'~ , ~ , ~ _ ,. FaothilVGiove intersecear :and 48' Avg. sefbadcs 17.32.OBOA.B.e. - along Foothill (range from 28' - to 70'9'). , Arbors al Route 66 - Page i of N N DESCRIPTION SINGLE FAMILY HOMES TOWNHOMES (LIVE I WORK TOWNHOMES) OFFICEICOMMERCIAL CODE SECTION - Development Code Proposal Development Code Proposal Development Code Proposal Foothill Blvd to Parking NA NA . 45' Avg.130' min. 60'154' 45' Avg.130' min. 104'181' 17.32.080.A.8. e. ( 70'154') Foothill Blvd. to Landscaping NA NA 20' Avg./18' min. 69'163' NA NA 17.08.040.D and Wall (47'140' ) Grove Avenue to Building 3T Avg. Vary d-5' 41' Avg. Vary+13' I-T NA 282'-31T -The FoothilVGrove -Large accent setbacks 17.08.040.8 ( 202') intersection should have been incorporated incorporate large accent induding 60' 8' from arb - Foothill Blvd. -Historic ' seWacks. to building at ~ Route 66 Visual -35' FoothilUGrove intersection Improvement Plan III. A. and 42'Avg. setbacks (page 9) along Grove (range from 25' 1'to 76'(. ~ 17.10.040.8 Red Hill Country Club Drive to - 2T it Red Hill Country -2T ?2T,'rf Red Hill Country - 31' Avg:; (rage' from NA 154' 17.08.040.8 Building Club Ddve is not vacated Club Drive is;dpt vacated 21'•1':65!: ) 185' ) Grove Avenue to Parking NA NA NA NA - NA 36' - 39' 17.32.OS0.A.8. e. -25' 17.10.040.8 Rear Property Line: 17.32.080A.8. e. Adjacent to Existing or Planned 25' NA 25' NA 25' NA Residential Development Adjacent to Existing or Planned 0' NA 0' NA 0' NA Commercal Development Interior Side Property Line: 17.32.OS0A.8. e. Adjacent to Existing or Planned 25' NA 25' NA 25' NA Residential Development Adjacent to Existing or Planned 5' NA 5' NA 5' NA Commercial development Intedor Site Boundary 15' 16' Avg.; From 15' - 37' 25' 77' Avg.; From 43' -110' NA NA 17.08.040.8. BUILDING SEPARATION AND SETBACK: FRONT TO FRONT No Patio or recessed patio NA NA 30' 30'-51' NA NA 17.080.040.E Arbors at Route 66 -Page 2 of N W SINGLE FAMILY HOMES TOWNHOMES OFFICEICOMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION (LIVE I WORK TOWNHOMES~ CODE SECTION Development Code Proposal Development Code Proposal Development Code Proposal Behveeh patio (enceAvall less NA NA 10' 30'-34' NA NA 17.08.040.E than 5' in heghtwithout sidewalk Behveen patio fencelwall less NA NA 15' -1"Floor. 30'-51' NA NA 17.08.040.E than 5' in heyhl with sidewalk - 2"a Floor. 27' - 84' add 5' between balconies Building to wrb (pa8o NA NA ( NA NA 17.08.040.E wallslwalks may project into setback provided min l0'area 17.02.140-Cluster is maintained free and clear for Devebpmenl landscaping Building to arb at project entry 20' 20' 20' NA NA 60' 17.08.040.E (patio wall shall not project into setback) PARKING Resident Parking Spaces 46 46 132 136 NA NA 17.12.040.A Required ~ (14 j (14 j Guest Paddrg Spaces 6 6 17 21 50 52 17.12.040A 17) (71 HEIGHT LIMRATIONS Basic Devebpmenl SUndard 35' 26' 35' 2-story 13-story 40' 34' Buildi~; 40' Tower 17.32.080A.8. d. 27' / 34' ( 27'l35' 1 17.10.040.A Within 50' of sUeet yaN curb NA NA 20' NA - 20' max. heght within 25' -34' Building, 40' Tower 17.32.080A.8. d. face. to 50' setback from cerb; set back 60' 8' from curb 40` other Locations and 45' at FoothilVGrove 17.10.040A Towers -~ intersection, 48' Avg. from - 40' max. height setback Foothill, and 42' Avg. fmm 35' hom arb Grove as pad of large '' ~ ~ accent setbacks. OPEN SPACE Private -ground Ooor 225 s. f. 951 s.f. Avg. 150 s. L 164 s.f. Avg.; range Irom NA NA 17.08.040.8 115 to 219 s.f Private-upperstory unit 150 s. 1. NA 100 s. f. NA NA NA 17.08.040.8 (182 s. 1. ) Arbors al Route 66 -Page 3 of IV SINGLE FAMILY HOMES TOWNHOMES OFFICEICOMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION (LIVE 1 WORK TOWNHOMES) CODE SECTION Development Code Proposal Development Code Proposal Development Code Proposal Common (excluding sewndary 30% 32%(entre site) 30% 32%(entire site) NA NA 17.08.040.8 streets and anedals) Usable Pdvate and Common 35 % 44 % (entire site) 35 % 44%(engre site) NA NA 17.08.040.8 Recreation Four (4) of the following or 1. Pool w/ restrooms Four (4) of the following or 1. Pool wl restrooms NA NA 17.08.040.H equivalent: 2. Spa equivalent: 2. Spa Open Lawn - 50' min. 3. Tot Lot Open Lawn - 50' min. 3. Tot Lot Tot Lot 4. Center Open lawn Tot Lot 4. Center Open lawn Pool 5. NEC Open Lawn Pool 5. NEC Open lawn Spa 6. BBO Area Spa 6. BBO Area BBO Area 7. Fire Place and Seating BBO Area 7. Fire Place and Seating Landscaping 17.08.040.G NA NA 45 Veeslgross aae 45 treeslgross aae NA NA 17.08.040.E NA NA 10%-36°box tress 10%-36'box~trees NA NA 10%- 24° box trees 10%- 24' box trees NA NA 80%-15 gallon frees 80%-15 gallon trees One 15 gal 8 one 5 gal One 75 gal 8 one 5 gal NA NA Front Yard Landscaping tree tree Min. On-Site Landscaping NA NA NA NA 15% 25% 17.32.OBO.A.B. d. Amenities NA 125 c.f. within garage; 1. 125 c.f. within garage. 1. 125 c.f. within garage NA NA 17.08.040.R interior laundry hook-ups provided 2. Provide laundry hook- 2. Interior laundry hook- ups ups provided. Arbors at Route 66 -Page 4 of ~ N P216 Arbors at Route 66 -Tentative Tract Map 18179 DISCUSSION AND DESIGN JUSTIFICATIONS FOR 8/21/06 INCOMPLETENESS COMMENTS (April 17, 2007) (1) Office building Setbacks from Foothill Blvd. and Grove Avenue (#'s II.B.2.c. & e.) -Development Standards: h -s --RCMC section ] 732.O~O.B.4. "Gateways" identifies the Foothill/Grove intersection as one of the two Entry Gateways along Foothill Boulevard. It states that: "The specific design of the two gateways is within the Foothill Boulevazd -Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan." ("VIP") The VIP states that: "The Grove Avenue intersection should incorporate lazge accent setbacks with a modified version of the City monument and a backdrop of large accent date . palms." (III. A. page 9) --With regazd to Foothill, RCMC section ] 7.32.080.A.8.e. contains a curb to building setback of 45', however that section refers specifically to Office and Residential Land Use, not Mixed-Use. --With regazd to Grove, RCMC section 17.10:040.B. contains a building to curb setback of 35', however, that section applies specifically to the use of land within "office/commercial districts," and this property is mixed use. -Desien Justification and Support: Applicant has provided lazge accent setbacks for the office building in relation to the Foothill/Grove intersection. In dealing with the envelope of the building, the approach was to break up its massing and create a smaller, pedestrian-friendly structure. To achieve this, the building has many recessed areas along Foothill and Grove as well as at the building's front entry azea. The variety of recesses creates an eclectic, playful feel often found in Tuscan azchitecture and brings an aesthetically pleasing symmetry to this comer. The Arbors has borrowed a number of design elements from the Sycamore Inn and Magic Lamp. The roof element has been broken up resulting in multiple, low-sloped roofs accented with a terracotta the and exposed rafters. The building creates a soft transition between the indoor and outdoor azeas through the use of colonnades; trellises, azched openings and multi-recessed design. Its placement helps to screen the parking azea from the streets and will help block sound from the intersection for the residential units. The result of this design is a dramatic 60' 8" setback from the curb at the FoothilUGrove intersection to the building's front entry. In addition, the setbacks from Foothill average 48', varying from 28' to 70'9", and the setbacks from Grove average 42', varying from 2~' I" to 76' These average setback measures exceed any relevant standads and provide the lazge accent setbacks required under the VIP. Page I of 3 P217 (2) Townhome Setbacks from Red Hill Country Club Drive if not vacated (# ILB.2.f.1 -Development Standards: --RCMC section 17.08.040.B. requires a curb to building setback of 27' in the event Red Hill Country Club Drive is not vacated. -Desien Justification and Support: The Townhomes have-been clustered throughout the site to create additional shazed open space for residents and is consistent with the project's overall design approach incorporating arbors and trellises to help create an intimate "village" feel. In addition to their Private, ground floor open space, Tov,~nhome residents can enjoy the Semi-Private open areas created by clustering their units which include landscaping, benches, a low seat wall, and trellises. The varying setbacks along Red Hil] provide accents that break up the site lines and provide more interesting elevations and visuals from that perspective. At no point aze the Townhomes unbrokenly massed along Red Hill, and the proposed setbacks average 31', vazying from 21' 1" to 65'. Setbacks of less than 27' feet occur at only five points of 36' each, or about 34% of the 52~' of frontage along Red Hill. At all other points along Red Hill the setbacks materially exceed 27'. Applicant is able to strictly comply with this standazd if the City desires, though adjusting the site plan in that mannei could reduce the project's central conunon open space azea. (3) Townhome Setbacks from curb (# ILB.3.): -Development Standazds- --RCMC section 17.08.040.E. requires internal curb to building setbacks of 1 ~' for the Townhomes' two-story sections and 20' for the Tovmhomes' three-story sections. --RCMC section 17.02.14.0 Definitions -Cluster Development -Desien Justification and Support: The proposed internal curb co building setbacks vary from 11' to 12' as a result of clustering the Townhomes which has been done to create additional shazed open space for residents and is consistent with the project's overall design approach incorporating arbors and trellises to help create an intimate "village" feel. This design enables the .Srbors to provide residents with additional Semi-Private and Common open space, which is encouraged under the City's development standadds. In addition to their Private, ground floor open space, Townhome residents can enjoy the Semi-Private open areas created by clustering their units which include landscaping, benches, a low seat wall, and trellises. In addition, al] residents can take full advantage of the extensive Common amenities and open space. The project's total Usable Private and Common open space exceeds relevant standards, as do the number of Recreation or equivalent amenities provided to residents. Page 2 of 3 P218 (4) Office buildng Height within 25' to 50' of street curb (# II.B.2.d.1: -Develonment Standards: --RCMC section 17.32.080.A.8.d. provides for a maximum height of 20' within 25' to 50' from the curb, and allows heights of 40' at other locations and 45' for towers, however that section refers specifically to,Office and Residential Land Use, not Mixed-Use. --RCMC section 17.10.040:A. allows for a maximum height of 40' beyond 3S from the curb, however that section applies specifically to the use of land within "office/commercial districts," and this property is not within a commercial or office district. -Design Justification and Sunnort: The office building was designed with its many recessed elements and two-story height of only 34', 40' Tower, to create a smaller, pedestrian-friendly structure. The building is not ]azge, covering 9,415 square feet, containing 12,610 square feet of leaseable space, and extending only 146' along both Crrove and Foothill. The roof element has been broken up resulting in multiple, ]ow-sloped roofs accented with a terracotta the and exposed rafters. This design has provided the lazge accent setbacks required for those streets under the VIP and are appropriate for the building's scale. It is consistent with the more urban design specified for this property by the City's Mixed Use development standards, while still retaining the "village" fee] of this "dinnerhouse" district. Its scale and placement help to screen the parking azea from the streets and will help block sound from the intersection for the residential units. (5) Private, ground floor open space provided for Townhomes (# II.B.4.1: -Develonment Standards: --RCMC 17.08.040.B. requires 150 square feet of Private, ground floor open space -Desigrt Justification and Support: The Townhomes provide an average of 164 square feet of Private, ground floor open space, varying from 115 to 219 square feet. These design variations are a result of clustering the units which is done to create additional shared open space for residents, help create an intimate village setting and feel, as well as being consistent with the project's overall design theme incorporating arbors and trellises. This design enables the Arbors to provide residents with additional Semi- Private and Common open space. In addition to their Private, ground floor open space, Townhome residents can enjoy the Semi-Private open azeas created by clustering their units which include landscaping, benches, a low seat wall, and trellises. In addition, all residents can take full advantage of the extensive Common amenities and open space. The project's total Usable Private and Common open space exceeds relevant standards, as do the number of Recreation or equivalent amenities provided to residents. Page 3 of 3 P219 C'ITI'OFR4~`CHO CLiC-1_1101'G.4 GENERAL PL.-LV 2.5.5.4 Western Gateway in the Bear Gulch Area Intent: This entrance to the City from the west is part of an important historical heritage that has not been able to compete successfully in the market place. The intent is to achieve: • A dynamic entrance to the City that reflects and sustains the historic character represented by a few existing structures in the area; • A "target district" that attracts specialty businesses and is attractive to both local residents and visitors to the community; A significant example of the historic Route 66 theme to exemplify the important role of the Rancho Cucamonga area during that historic era; and • A sustainable economic vitality. The primary, but not exclusive proposed uses are retail and service commercial serving the Red Hill and Bear Gulch neighborhoods as well as selective markets on a more regional scale as shown in Table III-7, Western Foothill Corridor -Western Gateway. This area has served as a "dinnerhouse" district, a certainly .desirable continued role as exemplified by the Sycamore Inn and the Magic Lamp restaurant. However, there is not enough current vitality to the area to sustain that specialty. By allowing a mix of commercial, tourist commercial, office and residential development with somewhat greater intensities than currently prevail, the possibility exists to generate investment interest in this area. Tourist serving commercial uses are an important component of this concept, but it must be recognized that the location limits access to as large a market as could be achieved at a freeway location. Office development is proposed as a means of achieving some level of daytime and early evening population in the area. Residential development should be multi- family condominium and apartment types to energize the district during day and evening business hours. General Plan policies and implementation actions will be included to encourage the assembly of parcels within this area. Incentive programs, including allowing for intensity/density bonuses or the offering of City assistance in the preparation of master plans for all or some portion of the Mixed Use area will be further defined. The following table specifies the uses and the range of development for each classification. The use categories are broad to allow for a high degree of flexibility and responsiveness to the market. EXHIBIT M P220 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: Order No. WHEN RECORDED, RETURN TO: Leven & Seligman, LLP (LSM) 1801 Century Park East, Suite 2200 Los Angeles, CA 90067 PARKING DECLARATION THIS PARKING DECLARATION dated as of for reference purposes only (this "Declaration"), is made by ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC, a California limited liability company ("Declarant"), with reference to the following; A, Declarant is the owner of certain real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, more particularly described as follows (the "Project Lots°): Lot 1 and Lot 2 of Tract in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California as pez Map filed in Book Pages in the Office of the County Recorder of said County. B. Declazant intends to develop each of the Project Lots with different uses as follows: Lot 1 will be developed with an office building, landscaping and an outdoor parking lot (the "Lot 1 Parking Lot"), while Lot 2 will be developed as a gated residential condominium community with private streets and recreations] amenities. Seven of the condominiums (herein, the "Live/Work Units') within the community on Lot 2 will be developed as residential units with a ground floor office space, The ground floor office space within the Live/Work Units and the entrance to the same wiB face the Lot 1 Parking Lot, whereas the entrance into the residential area of the Live/Work Units will be from private streets within Lot 2. C. To encourage and facilitate the use of and entrance tp the office/work area of the Live/Work Units by the invitees and clients (herein, the "L/lN Permitted Users') of the owners (or tenants) thereof; Declarant desires to create, establish and reserve hereby certain easements for parking over and upon the Lot 1 Parking Lot during business hours for the benefit of the Live/Work Units as hereinafter provided. D. Declarant also desires to establish certain other parking rights over and upon the Lot 1 Pazking Lot during non-business hours for the benefit of all of the condominiums on Lot 2 as hereinafter provided. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, incorporated herein by this reference, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, Declarant does hereby establish, create, declare and agree as follows: 1. Defined Terms. The following terms shall have the meanings set forth therefor in this Section: Page 1 G:141docalArbors. Rte 6611'arking Declaratlon.OS.doc EXHIBIT N P221 "Declarant" shall mean and refer to the entity identified above as the owner of Lots 1 and 2 and the same shall also mean and refer to the successors in interest of Declarant with respect to such ownership, namely, (a) the fee owner from time to tlme of Lot 1 and/or the owners' association, if any, formed for the purpose of governing and maintaining Lot 1 (herein, the "Lot 1 Owner") and also (b) the fee owner from lime to time of Lot 2 and/or the owners' association formed for the purpose of governing Lot 2 (herein, the "Lot 2 Owner"). The covenants and obligations made herein by Declarant as the Lot 1 Owner shall be the obligations and covenants of each successive Lot 1 Owner as and when fee ownership of Lot 1 (other than the transfer of title to condominiums on Lot 1) changes, and the covenants and obligations made herein by Declazant as the Lot 2 Owner shall be the obligations and covenants of each successive Lot Z Owner as and when fee ownership of Lot 2 (other than the transfer of title to condominiums on Lot 2) changes. "Lot 1 Business Hours' shell mean the hours from 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM, Monday through Friday. "Lot 2 Permitted Users" shall mean and refer to the L/ W Permitted Users rogether with the owners (or tenants) of the residential condominiums located on Lot 2 together with their guests and invitees. 2. Live/Work Parkins Easements, Declarant as the Lot 1 Owner does hereby declare, establish and create non-exclusive easements (the "Live/Work Parking Easements') over and upon the Lot 1 Parking Lot for the use and benefit of the Live/ Work Units for the parking of no more than rivo vehicles by the L/W Permitted Users at any one time during Lot 1 Business Hours. Declarant shall reserve hvo parking spaces for the L/W Permitted Users so marked within the Lot 1 Parking Lot along the eastern boundary of Lot 1 so that the same are in close proximity ro the Live/Work Units on Lot 2; provided, however, that the Lot 1 Owner shall have the right to move those parking spaces within the Lot 1 Parking Lot ro the extent reasonably necessary as determined by the Lot 1 Owner. The Live/Work Parking Easements herein created and established shall also include pedestrian use of the Lot 1 Parking Lot by the L/ W Permitted Users. 3. Lot 2 Parkins Riehts. The Lot 1 Owner does also hereby declare, establish and create the right and license for the benefit of the Lot 2 Permitted Users on anon-exclusive basis ro park in available parking spaces upon the Lot 1 Parking Lot except during Lot 1 Business Hours. The use of the Lot 1 Parking Lot by the Lot 2 Permitted Users shall be subject to such rules, regulations end restrictions that the Lot 1 Owner may adopt from time to time including those set forth on Exhibit A hereto provided that the same do not materially alter the rights and interests hereby created fot the benefit of the Lot 2 Permitted Users. 4. Parking Lot Maintenance & Costs. Declarant as the Lot 1 Owner does hereby covenant and agree to keep and maintain the Lot 1 Parking Lot in good condition and repair at all times, free of debris and other hazards and materials. The costs incurred by the Lot 1 Owner with respect ro the Lot 1 Parking Lot's maintenance (the "Maintenance Costs') shall be allocated pro rata among the users thereof including the tenants or users of the office building situated on Lot 1 and their invitees in accordance with the formula set forth on Exhibit B hereto. The share of Maintenance Costs allocated to the Lot 2 Permitted Users shall be payable monthly by the Lot 2 Owner to the Lot 2 Owner. 5. Reservation of Rights by Lot 1 Owner. Subject to the approval of governmental agencies having jurisdiction over the Project Lots, the Lot 1 Owner hereby reserves the following rights with respect to the use of the Lot 1 Parking Lot, whether by the Lot 2 Permitted Users or others: (a) to assign and/ or to reserve specific parking spaces to specific users, (b) to permit the public ro use the Lot 1 Pazking Lot at times other than the Lot 1 Business Hours (provided, however, that the Lot 1 Owner does not covenant hereby to prevent public access to the Lot 1 Parking Lot at any time -- whether during the Lot 1 Business Hours or otherwise), and (c) to restrict access to and use of the Lot 1 Parking Lot from time Page 2 G:141dacsWrbors. R!e 661Parking Declaralian.OS.doc P222 to time to the extent necessary or appropriate in order to perform maintenance thereon and/or for safety reasons. 6. Insurance Obli ag lions. 7. Indemnity Provisions. 8. Dispute Resolution. (Mediation and Arbitration) 9. Waivers. The failure of the Lot 1 Owner or the Lot 2 Owner to require strict compliance with or to enforce strictly any of the terms or provisions hereof shall not constitute a waiver of that part}~s right thereafter to require strict compliance or to enforce the same or any other term or provision. No waiver of any provision hereof shall be valid unless the same is in writing, signed by the party to be charged, and no such waiver shall be deemed or construed to be a waiver of any other provision hereof or a continuing waiver or the same or any other provision unless expressly provided to the contrary. 10. Severability. If'any term or provision hereof shall be held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable or invalid for any reason, the remaining portions hereof shall be unaffected thereby and shall remain in full force and effect. , 11. Mortgagees Protection. No violation hereof shall affect or impair the lien or charge of any bona fide mortgage or deed of trust made in good faith and for value on all or any portion of the Project Lots. 12 Attomeys' Fees. In the event that any action or proceeding is brought to enforce or to interpret of to obtain a declaration of the terms hereof or the rights or obligations of the parties hereunder or to resolve any dispute, controversy or claim among the parties hereto or to enjoin any breach or violation hereof, the prevailing party in any such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover from the losing party its costs of suit including its reasonable attorneys' fees as may be fixed by the court. 13. Covenants Running with the Land. This Declaration and the easements, covenants and restrictions hereby established shall be construed as covenants running with the land that constitutes the Project Lots as an equitable servitude on each of them, as necessary, to achieve the intent of the party hereto. IN WTTNESS WHEREOF, Declarant as the Lot 1 Owner and the Lot 2 Owner has executed or caused this Declaration to be executed by its authorized officer, agent or representative as of the dare first written above. "Declarant" Arbors at Route 66, LLC, a California limited liability company sy G:WWocsUrbora. R!e 661Parking Declarnlian.OS.doc its Page 3 P223 STATE OP 1 COUNTY OF ss. On .before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that such he/she executed the same in his/her authorized capacity, and that by his/her signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public in and for said State Page 4 G:I4ldacsWrbors. Rte 66lParking Declaration.OS.doe P224 Exhibit A Restrictions on Use of the Lot 1 Pazking Lot (to be provided) Page 5 G:1lWowUrbora. Rie 66Warking Declarafron.O3.doc , P226 ARTICLE VIII USE RESTRICTIONS Section 8.3 LivelWork Unit Restrictions. In addition to the general use restrictions set forth in other provisions of Artic]e VIII hereof, the Live/Work Units shall also be subject to the following limitations and restrictions: 8.3.1 Restricted Uses. The Live/Work Units are designed to combine in one space both a work area or office and a residence. The permitted uses of the Live/ Work Units shall be professional in nature and the same may include use by the following as well as persons with similar professions: accountants, bookkeepers, appraisers, lawyers, consultants, design professionals such as architects and landscape, fashion and interior designers, aztists, artisans and photographers, insurance, real estate and travel agents, mortgage loan brokers, computer software and multimedia-related professionals, and businesses that perform their services off-site but require an office for business management purposes including sales incidental to the businesses conducted by the foregoing. Furthermore, the business operated within alive/Work Unit shall be subject to the following: (a) the business must be operated solely within the ground floor level of the Live/Work Unit and shall not extend beyond the same, either to the Association Property or other levels or areas (e.g., the garage) of the Live/Work Unit; (b) the business is limited to the rendering of professional services or other similar activities by the Owner or tenant of the Live/Work Unit; (c) the operation of the business is permitted by, and is at all times in compliance with, aB applicable laws; and (d) operation of the business does not result in (i) the violation of any of the provisions of the Governing Documents, (ii) any significant increase in the use of the Association Property or its Improvements by the Invitees to any Live/ Work Unit, (iii) any odor, noise or vibration outside of the Live/Work Unit, or (iv) any negative impact on the rate or availability of insurance for the Project or the Building in which the Live/ Work Unit is situated. The Live/ Work Units shall not be used primari]y for retail uses or any other use that attracts or relies upon continual customers, visitors or members of the general public. For example, no Live/Work Unit shall be used as a retail operation for the sale of food or beverages, vitamins, flowers, gifts, pets or pet food or similar products or for the provision of onsite services such as a haircutting salon or barbershop, a tattoo parlor, music or other instruction or lessons. 8.3.2 Office Building Parking Lot. Use of the Office Building Parking Lot by the Invitees of Owners of Live/Work Units is otherwise subject to the terms, provisions, conditions, requirements and restrictions set forth in the Parking Declazation, which creates, among other things, non-exclusive easements for parking for the benefit of and as an appurtenance to the Project's Live/Work Units. Each Live/Work Unit shall be liable for its share of the costs, fees and expenses incurred in connection with the maintenance and repair of the Office Building Parking Lot as provided in the Parking Declaration. Each Owner of a Live/ Work Unit shall also be liable to the Association and to third parties for all damage, loss, liability, costs and expenses associated with the acts and/or omissions of such Owner in the use of the Office Building Parking Lot, whether by such Owner or its Invitees. Said non-exclusive parking easements shalt run with and be binding upon the Live/Work Units as provided in the Parking Declaration. 8.3.3 Access Doors for Invitees. Notwithstanding any contrary provisions herein, Owners of the Live/ Work Units shall be solely responsible for the maintenance, repair and replacement (including casualty insurance for the same) of the exterior doors and windows that provide access or light to the work area or office of the Live/ Work Unit. 8.3.4 Si a e. [to be provided] 8.3.5 Project Parking. [cross reference to following Section in Article II of CC&Rs] n~ine,,,..u.~..... n.. <ai._. ~.,,, ...._ .,,_..v (LSM).04.doc EXHIBIT O P227 Section 2 Parking Easements for Live/Work Units. Declarant does hereby reserve and establish as an appurtenance to and for the exclusive use and benefit of the Live/ Work Units during Business Hours only (i.e., 8:00 am - 6:00 pm Mon-Fri) those certain five parking spaces (the "Live/Work Parking Spaces") situated upon the Association Property that are depicted on Exhibit _ hereto, and the same shall be so reserved by means of appropriate signs maintained by the Association. Notwithstanding the identification of the Live/ Work Pazking Spaces on said Exhibit ~ the Association shall have the right, power and authority to move the location of the Live/Work Parking Spaces from time to time th order to meet the needs of the Owners within the Project. 8.3.6 Use of Project Amenities. [no access to or use of Project amenities by Invitees of Live/ Work Units unless accompanied by Owner of Live/ Work Unit] 8.3.7 Change in Use of Live/ Work Units. Any change in use of a Live/ Work Unit shall require the prior approval of the Board of Directors and the same shall be based upon the restrictions and requirements of this Section 8.3 and the Governing Documents. An Owner who proposes to change the use of his Live/ Work Unit (whether as a result of the sale of the same to a buyer or the lease of the same to a tenant of the entire Live/Work Unit or otherwise) shall submit his request for approval to the Board together with such additional documents and information as the Board may require, and the Board shall render its decision within days after receipt of all requested and required information. G:W NocaUrbors. Rte 661Art Vlll Live-Work (LSMJ.04.doc P228 Memo to: Vance Pomeroy From: Peter Bachmann/Jason Kamm Date: May 29, 200'7 Re: Arbors at Route 66 -Summary of Neighbor Outreach Efforts We put the property under contract in May 2005 and almost immediately began meeting with the adjacent Rancho neighbors including Debra Wilson, Anthony Vernola who owns the Magic Lamp, Reza Vafa, the proprietor of the gas station, and Mark Campbell who is the general manager of the Red Hill Country Club, as well as the four Upland neighbors along the northern property boundary, the Foys, Hamms, Parsons and Jon Oloffson. Virtually from the beginning of the development process and until now, we have by phone, a-mail or in person spoke and/or met with these individuals more than 40 times regazding the project, and will continue to have additional meetings and conversations with them. With regazd to our Neighborhood meetings, Rancho required that we notice property owners within a 2000-foot radius of the property plus the 500 or so individuals who had appeazed on a petition list that was generated in Fall 2006, for a total of approximately 1300 property ovmers. Although those meetings were to be held on Mazch 6th, 8th, and 12a', starting in mid-January we began visiting neighbors' homes in both Rancho Cucamonga and Upland to introduce ourselves and talk with them about the project and any concerns or issues they might have. We spent about twelve (12) days walking the neighborhoods and visited more than 300 homes within the notice area, including approximate]y 190 in Rancho and 125 in Upland. We spent as long or as short with people as they wanted to discuss the project and any issues they had. Most people were home when we called, but if people were not home, we left letters with our contact information and approximately twelve called us at a later date: We had our Neighborhood Meetings during the first two weeks of Mazch on the dates specified above. The invitations were mailed at least two weeks before each meeting and a neighbor created an additional flyer urging Rancho neighbors to attend the meetings. All three meetings were attended by a combination of Rancho and Upland neighbors and we had our Traffic Engineer attend the third meeting on Mazch 12th to help answer questions. On Saturday, Mazch 10th, we called twelve of the project's harshest critics to let them know that our Traffic Engineer would be there to try and help deal with their traffic issues. A total of 108 neighbors came to the three meetings. As we have been developing this project with the City of Rancho over the past two years, we have also been engaged along the way with neighbors regarding traffic, pazking, the property's zoning and mix of uses, the site plan, density, protecting views and privacy, property values, hours of operation, restrictions on live/work units, access, parking, unit sizes, landscaping, and retaining walls, among other things. Some of the results of these meetings and discussions include: 1) choosing to go mostly residential instead of commercial for less traffic, fewer parking issues, less noise, and nicer views; 2) where Rancho wanted a commercial piece, choosing office over retail because of shorter hours of operation and less traffic and so as not to compete with azea retail; 3) choosing general EXHIBIT P P229 office over medical office to further reduce traffic by more than 300 daily trips; 4) reducing unit count during the development process from 127 to 98 including adding a higher proportion of single family homes instead of townhomes resulting in a reduction in density from 12.7 to 9.8; 5) placing one-story single family homes along the northem and southeastern boundazies to be more compatible with and less intrusive of those adjacent single family one-story homes; 6) placing appropriate use restrictions on the live/work units; 7) working out CC&R's to ensure that the Office tenants, live/work residents, and residents can all take appropriate advantage of the project's pazking; 8) offering to pay for the construction of new retaining walls along the northem boundary and on the Upland neighbors' properties to replace the existing, insufficient retaining walls on and along their properties; 9) providing for and paying to install a new tree/landscape buffer along that boundazy and the southeastern boundary along Debra Wilson's property; and 10) site access via Grove Avenue with emergency-only access on Red Hill Country Club Drive. ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC 16661 Ventura Blvd., Suite J1712 Encino, California 91436 Phn: (818) 325-8840 Fax: (818) 906-9859 Mazch 19, 2007 Vance Pomeroy Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Neighborhood Meetings Report Arbors at Route 66 Northeast Comer of Foothill & Grove APN's 0207-011-035, 36, and 41, 43, 44, 45 Tentative Tract Map # 18179 & DRC 2006-00341 Dear Vance: Pursuant to the City Council's direction, we invited the people listed on the 2000' radius map and "petition list" to the neighborhood meetings. This totaled approximately 1,300 area residences and businesses. For a number of weeks prior to these meetings, Jason and Peter walked the adjacent neighborhoods and visited over 300 homes in Rancho Cucamonga and Upland reviewing the project with neighbors, discussing questions and concerns, and informing them of these meetings before the invitations were sent. This was in addition to many conversations and meetings held over the past 20 months with the Rancho and Upland neighbors who immediately border the property. Three (3) separate meetings were held at 7 pm on Tuesday, 3/6/2007, Thursday, 3/8/2007, and Monday, 3/12/2007, at the Aita Auditorium at the San Antonio Community Hospital. The invitations for the 3/6 and 3/8 meetings were mailed on Friday 2/16/07 and the invitations for the 3/12 meeting were mailed on Tuesday 2/20/07. Also, a neighbor sent out an additional flyer to neighbors urging them to come to the meetings. All three meetings were attended by a combination of neighbors from both cities. 26 full-size boards were displayed at all the meetings including color site plans, landscape plans, building elevations, renderings, and unit floor plans. Copies of the site plan, renderings, elevations, and floor plans were made available to attendees to take if they wanted, along with a copy of General Plan section 2.5:5.4 for the Western Gateway in the Beaz Gulch Area, a copy of the chart summarizing the project's trip generation in comparison with other project alternatives, Appendix E of the Traffic Study -Trip Generation Guide, and a copy of the letter from the Central School District projecting the number of K-8 students generated by the project. P230 EXHIBIT Q Foothill & Grove -Neighborhood Meeting Summary Page 2 of 5 People were allowed to walk around and look at the boards, talk, and ask questions on an unstructured basis for the first 15 minutes or so. After that period and when everyone was seated, we provided a 15-20 minute presentation about the project and then allowed questions and comments until neighbors had no more. We had our Traffic Engineer, Paul Martin, attend the March l2 meeting, and called 16 neighbors on that prior Saturday to let them know Paul would be there. Attendance at the meetings was as follows: March 6, 2007 - 33 people March 8, 2007 - 63 people (12 repeat) March 12, 2007 - 39 people (15 repeat) The combined totals reflect 108 different community members from the two cities at the meetings from the approximately 1,300 invitations sent out. The following is a"summary of the questions, concerns, issues and problems expressed at the meeting, and a description of how we have addressed them. As a genera] matter, we were fortunate to understand the major issues concerning neighbors from the beginning of this process from meetings with, and input received from the City Planning and Engineering staffs, as well the City's Planning Commissioners in October 2005. This has enabled us to work with staff over the past 20 months to design a project that anticipated and actively addressed neighbor concerns. To our knowledge, there are no neighbor concerns we have not willingly addressed during this process. Can the area handle the total daily trips generated by the project? Do residential units really generate less traffic than office, retail and medical uses? The project is designed to be primarily residential, which generates significantly fewer daily car trips than other uses allowed under the property's Mixed-use zoning, such as a large medical facility or retail center would. Based upon the standards utilized by the Institute of Traffic Engineers and the City's Engineering staff, the traffic forecast to be generated by this project is 799 daily trips. This is a fraction of the daily trips forecast to be generated by potential alternative projects including a lazge medical facility, which would generate 6,541 daily trips, and a large retail facility, which would generate 4,105 daily trips. Choosing office over retail was driven in large part by neighbors' desires to limit hours of operations and traffic for the commercial portion of the site. Retail generates more traffic than office, and operates on more of a "24/7" basis which can be more disruptive to neighbors. Also, because the office building will be largely vacant on weekends and weeknights, it can provided residents additional parking at those times if needed. P231 General office was chosen over medical office which will save more than 300 daily trips because medical office generates more than three times the daily trips that general office does. P232 Foothill & Grove -Neighborhood Meeting Summary Page 3 of 5 2. How will these additional trips impact the FoothilUGrove intersection and traffic up Red Hill Country Club Drive, including additional students and trips to the Valle Vista Elementary School? With the addition of project-generated trips, the FoothilUGrove intersection would continue operating at a Level of Service, or LOS, grade of C, which is a grade higher than the City's acceptable intersection standard of LOS D. In fact, the impact is de- minimus. Currently, the Average AM Delay is 21.6 seconds and the Average PM Delay is 24.4 seconds. The project generated traffic brings the Average AM Delay up only 2/1 Oths of a second to 21.8, and the Average PM Delay up 1/10th of a second to 24.5. Based upon City-established thresholds of significance, the addition of project related trips is forecast to result in no significant impacts. No SANBAG Congestion Management Program Traffic Impact Analysis is required because both a.m. and p.m. peak hour trips are well below thresholds. Theses results are before factoring in the City's Foothill Boulevard improvements, which should do more to improve traffic at that intersection and along Foothill. According to an analysis done by the Central School District, the project will generate 17 elementary school students which translates into 20 trips per day on Red Hill Country Club Drive to and from the Valle Vista Elementary School. Given Red Hill's existing traffic count of 3,609 daily trips, this would result in an increase of only .55 percent. 3. Upland residents raised concerns about the project having a sole point of access onto Grove Avenue, largely relating to traffic and fairness. They asked questions about the traffic analysis that concluded this was appropriate, and whether the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Upland had both agreed with this approach. The Grove Avenue access has been analyzed, reviewed and approved by the project's traffic engineer, Rancho Cucamonga Engineering, and the City of Upland in conjunction with emergency access only on Red Hill Country Club Drive. The driveway/entrance is 60 feet in width, as opposed to the normally-required 50 feet width. The access meets the City of Rancho Cucamonga's sight line and other requirements, and the residential gate works to regulate traffic at the entrance. Though this sole point of access puts all of the traffic onto Grove, the total traffic generated by the project is low, and significantly lower than other development alternatives. Also, the small size of this project allows for only one access point, where virtually all larger commercial alternatives would require at least two full points of access. If one of the commercial project alternatives described in the traffic study were developed on the site, we agree that a second point of ingress/egress would be required for the project. However, as a comparison, if the Grove access bore only 50% of the P233 Foothill & Grove -Neighborhood Meeting Summazy Page 4 of 5 higher volume of traffic generated by each of those other two uses, the total trips on Grove would be still be materially higher than the 799 proposed by the project. 4. Concerns were raised about the density of the project, which for the most part related back to the amount of traffic the project would generate. There were virtually no negative comments about the project's quality, site plan or architecture. The City's development standazds allow up to 14 units per acre under the mixed-use designation. Over the 20-month development process, the number of residential units has been reduced several times from its starting point of ] 27. The current number of 98 units, along with its density of 9.8 per acre, are well below al]owable standazds. The proposed combination of a small office building, live/work townhomes, and high quality single family homes and townhomes, is designed to generate far less traffic than other allowable uses involving a retail center or medical facility would. For example, a development including a large medical facility would generate 8.2 times the number of daily trips, and a large retail center 5.1 times that number. 5. What was the General Plan Amendment for? The property is part of the Western Gateway in the Bear Gulch Area, Foothill Boulevard Development District. Its primarily Mixed-use designation allows for different combinations of Commercial and Residential uses subject to the ranges and caps set forth in Table III-7 of Section 2.5.5.4 of the 2001 General Plan. Table III-7 gives the City the flexibility to determine what this exact mix of uses should be, allowing "for a high degree of flexibility and responsiveness to the market" at the time the property is developed. The project as proposed falls within those acceptable ranges of uses and is under the cap for total residential units allowed. There are two parts to the GPA. The first is a request to change the zoning of the 1.4 acre portion of the property zoned low density residential to mixed-use to make it consistent with the 8.6 acre portion of the property already zoned mixed-use. This is common to do when a property contains a number of pazcels under one ownership to help facilitate an orderly and consistent development of the property overall. The second part of the GPA relates to the total number of residential units for the area. Table III-7 allows for the total number of residential units for the entire 55-acre Bear Gulch Area to range from 231 to 385. Currently, 206 units have been approved for development there, so the GPA would confirm an azea total of 304 units, still well below the cap of 385. 6. A sentiment that the strawberry farm should remain forever. We understand that the strawberry farm is loved by neighbors. The farmer, Brian Nicolson, has known for awhile that the property would be sold by the Hospital and has been preparing for that. He and virtually all neighbors acknowledge that the property will be developed, but we understand peoples' feelings about the strawberry farm and P234 Foothill & Grove -Neighborhood Meeting Summary Page 5 of 5 have worked to be understanding of this, including allowing brian to remain as long as possible. 7. What is going on with the planned Foothill Boulevazd improvements and Red Hil] Country Club Drive re-alignment? How does this project fit in with those plans? For the status of the Foothill Boulevard improvements and Red Hill Drive realignment, we told neighbors that they should speak with City personnel. As part of the Western Gateway in the Beaz Gulch Area, this property is part of the City's entrance from Upland, and was designed with that in mind. The project is responsible for building the City monument and the Route 66 landscaping and visual improvements along its Foothill frontage. The office building's corner orientation, lazge accent setbacks and architecture, along with the City's landscape and sign design, help create a dynamic entrance to the City. The ability to both live and work at the project in a high quality "village like" environment makes it unique in Rancho. The project is helping with Rancho's efforts to honor the historic nature of Route 66 through its name, signage, azbors theme, and architectural elements. The project's combination of residential and office use helps achieve the City's desired level of population and activity for this "dinnerhouse" district contributing to the area's economic vitality. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, Jason Kamm & Peter Bachmann Attachments: 1. Meeting Attendance List (summary of all three meetings) 2. Copies of Sign In Sheets from 3/6, 3/8, and 3/] 2 3. Meeting Invitations 4. Petition Mailing List 5. 2000' Radius Map Mailing List 6. Copy of Neighbor Flyer 7. Copy of Project Graphics 8. Proposed and Alternate Land Use Daily Trip Generation Chart 9. Appendix E of the Traffic Study -Trip Generation Guide 10. Letter from Central School District on Student Generation and trips 11. General Plan, Section 2.5.5.4 -Western Gateway in the Beaz Gulch Area m Arbors at Route 66 -Meeting Attendance List 2 First Name Last Name 3/6/07 3/8/07 3/12/07 Address City Z~ Phone ~T 1 Debbie Schneider 1 1174 Loma Sola Ave Upland 91786 (909) 982-6846 W 2 Sandy Macy 1 1 1 8430 Red Hill Country Club Dr. Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 981-1911 '~ 3 Corbet Macy 1 1 1 8430 Red Hill Country Club Dr. Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 981-1911 4 Pat Bomberger 1 7881 Lita Court Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 982-0884 5 Jack Bomberger 1 7881 Lita Court Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 982-0884 6 Pat Bourland 1 1 1 8651 Calle Quebrada Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 982-4816 7 Steven Foy 1 1 1124 Loma Sola Upland 91786 (909) 981-1690 8 Mrs. Steven Foy 1 1124 Loma Sola Upland 91786 (909) 981-1690 9 Debbie Parsons 1 1 1130 Loma Sola Upland 91786 (909) 982-4632 10 Andy Parsons 1 1 1130 Loma Sola Upland 91786 (909) 982-4632 11 Allen Vanderbilt 1 1177 Loma Sola Upland 91786 (909) 985-8228 12 Melinda Vanderbilt 1 1177 Loma Sola Upland 91786 (909) 985-8228 13 Tom Mertz 1 1416 Bonita Upland 91786 (909) 949-1143 14 Colleen Mertz 1 1416 Bonita Upland 91786 (909) 949-1143 15 Daniel Wren 1 1 8557 Calle Feliz Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 225-1599 16 Peter Rey 1 1 1 1463 E. 13th St. Upland 91786 (909) 931-1554 17 Michelle Rey 1 1 1463 E. 13th St. Upland 91786 (909) 931-1554 18 Bernice Holtrust 1 7642 Alta Cuesta Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 985-9435 19 Reza Vava 1 Gas Station Operator (909) 702-0696 20 Kay Koeth 1 Gas Station Owner (909) 702-0696 21 Giovanni Oliva 1 (626) 221-5523 22 Jon Olafsson 1 1142 Loma Sola Upland 91786 (909) 985-3356 23 Mark EI Tine 1 1051 Grove Ave Upland 91765 (909) 612-2185 24 Sylvia Scharf 1 1 460 N. Euclid Upland 91785 (909) 931-4130 25 Jim Moffat 1 1 1 8569 Calle Feliz Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 985-6558 26 Edmund Wolski 1 1 8431 Via Ladera Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 985-8466 27 Brett Prorta 1 8399 Camino Sur Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 985-1716 28 Brigid Barnett 1 1321 Alta Ave Upland 91786 (909) 982-5456 29 Eileen Barnett 1 1321 Alta Ave Upland 91786 (909) 982-5456 30 Richard Cordova 1 1206 N. Grove Ave Upland 91786 (909) 946-7790 31 James Hamm 1 1 1136 Loma Sola Ave Upland 91786 (909) 982-0875 32 Sherri Wasson 1 1294 Veterans Court Upland 91786 (909) 982-2535 33 ??? ??? 1 8727 Calle Corazon Rancho Cucamonga 91.730 (909) 982-1932 34 Barbara Wood 1 1260 Grove Upland 91786 (909) 981-3654 35 Harold Wood 1 1260 Grove Upland 91786 (909) 981-3654 36 Joan Moffett 1 1 1305 N. Grove Upland 91786 (909) 37 Nancy Court 1 8485 Red Hill CC Drive Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 981-7296 38 Burt Court 1 8485 Red Hill CC Drive Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 981-7296 39 Ray Aguilar 1 8495 Calle Carabe St Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 946-6431 40 Lydia Teenor 1 8731 Red Hill CC Drive Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 982-0863 Page 1 N W Arbors at Route 66 -Meeting Attendance List First Name Last Name 3/6/07 3/8/07 3/12/07 Address City ZZ~ Phone 41 Will Stark 1 1253 Loma Sola Upland 91786 (909) 931-1104 42 Donna Stark 1 1253 Loma Sola Upland 91786 (909) 931-1104 43 Jeff Dumond 1 8224 Red Hill CC Drive Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 949-7374 44 Vada Johnson 1 7693 Alta Cuesta Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 981-3984 45 Georgia Westphal 1 7833 Alta Cuesta Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 982-3004 46 Robert La Sota 1 1316 Loma Sala Upland 91786 (909) 946-6345 47 Aubert Johnson 1 7693 Alta Cuesta Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 981-3984 48 Craig Trisker 1 1412 Grove Ave Upland 91786 (909) 981-4104 49 Kathy Trisker 1 1412 Grove Ave Upland 91786 (909) 981-4104 50 Chris Catalano 1 7810 Buena Vista Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 730-5466 51 Michelle Dietl 1 7731 Alta Cuesta Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 608-7445 52 Roy Snyder 1 1328 Loma Sola Upland 91786 (909) 982-8828 53 Mary Lou Jensen 1 7809 Alta Cuesta Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 98-2525 54 Dan Rupp 1 7216 Garnett St Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 981-2525 55 Georgia Kuettle 1 8068 Valle Vista D. Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 985-3901 56 Herman Kuettle 1 8068 Valle Vista D. Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 985-3901 57 Carmen Werner 1 7881 Alta Cuesta Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 238-5259 58 Howard Williams 1 7887 Valle Vista Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 946-2074 59 Jane Kiburis 1 7887 Valle Vista Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 946-2074 60 Evelyn Bensema 1 8650 Calle Quebrada Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 985-7795 61 Cal Bensema 1 8650 Calle Quebrada Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 985-7795 62 Jerie Lee 1 6609 Palo Verde PI Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 899-5399 63 William Brown 1 1 7624 Alta Cuesta Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 981-1974 64 Pauline Brown 1 1 7624 Alta Cuesta Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 981-1974 65 Janet Swan 1 7874 Buena Vista Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 981-2762 66 Ruth Farvara 1 7747 Alta Cuesta Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 982-5120 67 Tom Hansen 1 ??? ??? (909) 68 Peg Lowrey 1 1475 Grove Ave Upland 91786 (909) 69 Pete Lowrey 1 1475 Grove Ave Upland 91786 (909) 70 David Brochey 1 1 1475 E. 13th St. Upland 91786 (909) 946-9585 71 Suzanna Capparelli 1 7931 Alta Cuesta Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 982-0669 72 Dave Hendry 1 7700 Valle Vista Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 985-1695 73 Nely Hendry 1 7700 Valle Vista Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 985-1695 74 Ben Mackall 1 7973 Valle Vista Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 952-0333 75 Judy Hana 1 7838 Alta Cuesta Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 985-0921 76 Lou D'Agustino 1 7838 Alta Cuesta Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 985-0921 77 Blanca De Carrea 1 1415 N. Grove Upland 97186 (909) 985-1986 78 Alex De Carrea 1 1415 N. Grove Upland 97186 (909) 985-1986 79 Elizabeth Lugo 1 Monte Verde Upland 97186 (909) 80 Cheke De Carrea 1 Monte Verde Upland 97186 (909) Page 2 N W Arbors at Route 66 -Meeting Attendance List First Name Last Name 3/6/07 3/8/07 3/12/07 Address City Z~ Phone 81 Betty May 1 7886 Alta Cuesta Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 981-6060 82 Diane Dyan 1 Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 955-5510 83 Vincent Totero 1 1552 Red Hill Upland 91786 (909) 946-0906 84 Lorene Culpepper 1 1 1421 E. 14th Upland 91786 (909) 85 Lorinela Culpepper 1 1 1401 Monte Verde Upland 97186 (909) 86 Anthony Vernola 1 8189 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 262-5249 87 Pat Davis 1 7547 Alta Cuesta Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 261-8827 88 Cheryl Cochran 1 7949 Valle Vista Drive Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 982-1084 89 La Vella Cochran 1 7949 Valle Vista Drive Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 982-1084 90 Anthony DiTommaso 1 1317 N. First Ave Upland 91786 (909) 985-1785 91 Jaqueline Hoff 1 8536 Calle Feliz Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 949-0660 92 Walt Hoff 1 8536 Calle Feliz Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 949-0660 93 Russ Burroughs 1 1444 Estrellita Ct Upland 91786 (909) 985-2352 94 Crystal Burroughs 1 1444 Estrellita Ct Upland 91786 (909) 985-2352 95 Debra Wilson 1 8238 Red Hill Country Club Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 519-5774 96 Marion Oates 1 7420 Via Paraiso Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 920-0593 97 Shirley Karoll 1 7406 Via Paraiso Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 982-3341 98 Peg Cheadle 1 7670 Alta Cuesta Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 982-0573 99 Gordon Berlant 1 7740 Valle Vista Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 985-2662 100 Carol Berlant 1 7740 Valle Vista Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 985-2662 101 Georgia Olson 1 1315 Loma Sola Upland 91786 (909) 985-6620 102 Sandra DeiU 1 7576 EI Arco Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 982-5881 103 Louise Stevens 1 7833 Sierra Vista Drive Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 985-0875 104 Ben Stevens 1 7833 Sierra Vista Drive Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 985-0875 105 Jennifer Jones 1 7481 Buena Vista Dr Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 106 R. Jones 1 7481 Buena Vista Dr Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 107 Roger Rapp 1 8546 Red Hill CC Drive Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 949-8138 108 Hilde Lesinsky 1 ??? ??? 109 Elaine Edwards 1 7899 Alta Cuesta Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 982-3270 110 Claxton Trejo 1 1473 E. 13th St Upland 91786 (909) 985-7864 111 Paul Pound 1 7680 Alta Cuesta Rancho Cucamonga 91730 (909) 946-1350 Totals 33 63 39 2nd Meeting had 12 repeat people, Petition List, Red Hill and circulated an additional invitation to people to come ' 3rd Meeting had 15 repeat people Vance Pomeroy, Project Planner, attended all three meetings v N W V Page 3 ANTHONY VERNOLA'S 8189 FOOTHILL BLVD. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 ~,~ ~. ~~~ Telephone: (909) 981-8659 ~~~~~ °~'~~ Faz: (909) 981-2039 www.themagiclampinn. com June 7, 2007 The Planning Commission The City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Vance Pomeroy Re: Arbors at Route 66 TTM 18179 CI?Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JUN ~ 2 2007 RECEIVED - PLANPJIN6 Honorable Commissioners and City Council Members: I have met with the developers of the Arbors at Route 66 as well as attended one of the neighborhood meetings and have reviewed the plans and other information related to this project. I feel this is a high quality development, which would be an asset to our Rancho Cucamonga community and wanted to express my support. Thank you for your consideration-and please feel free to call with any questions. Sincerely, Anthony Vernola EXHIBIT S P239 Steve Pilcher 7855 Sierra Vista Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 626-6644110 June 12, 2007 The Planning Commission The City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729 Re: Arbors at Route 66 TTM 18179 Attention: Vance Pomeroy Honorable Commissioners and City Council Members: CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~ONGA JUN 13 ?007 RECEIVED - PLANNINf~ I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga and a member of the Red Hill Country Club. I have met with the developers of the Arbors at Route 66 and reviewed the plans and other information related to this project. I feel this is a high quality project which would be an asset to our Rancho Cucamonga community and wanted to express my support Thank you for your consideration and please feel free to call with any questions. Since Steve Pilcher P240 Bruce T. Zwissler 7879 Sierra Vista Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 909-957-5619 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGR June 7, 2007 JUtS 1 I ?007 The Planning Commission RECEIVED -PLANNING The City Council Cityaof CRanclao:Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91729 Attention: Vance Pomeroy Re: Arbors at Route 66 TTM 18179 Dear Honorable Commissioners and City Council Members: A have spoken with Peter Bachmann of the Arbors at Route 66 and discussed the plans and other information related to this project. I feel this is a high quality development which would be an asset to our Rancho Cucamonga community and wanted to express my support. I look forvvard to seeing you at the Planning Commission hearing on June 27~n Thank you for your consideration and please feel free to call me with any questions. Sincerely, P241 P.O. Box 306 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 June 12, 2007 ~N 13 Td1)~j ~-~~JWlnt&; The Planning Commission The City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga . 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Attn: Vance Pomeroy Re: Arbors at Route 66 TTM 18179 Honorable Commissioners and City Council Members: Our family has owned & operated a business in the city of Rancho Cucamonga since September 1970. When we were notified in writing about the development we were very excited to see the Live/Work town homes. We contacted the developers of the Arbors at Route 66 to review the plans and other information related to this project and believe the town homes offer an immense opportunity for small business owners who can operate their businesses downstairs & live upstairs. We feel this is a high quality development which would be an asset to our community and we want to express our support. Thank you for your consideration and please feel free to call me with any questions. ~O~ ~a~ 800 795-6647 Termite ~ _ q )4 (800) 585 66 7 (2 Hr. Fax) Family Owned & Operated Since 1970 ~11'0F RANCHO CUCAI[0[~p~, Corporate ecret for Bill Long Termite Control, Inc. dba Longs Te P242 Ben Mackall P.O. Box 148 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729-0148 909-952-0333 June 7, 2007 The Planning Commission The City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,. Ca. 91729 Attention: Vance Pomeroy Re: Arbors at Route 66 TTM 18179 Honorable Commissioners and City Council Members: J~~~ a ~ zoos RECEIVED - PLANfdIN4~ Our family has been longtime residents of this City and atone time our mother owned this property at the corner of Foothill and Grove. I have met with the developers of the Arbors at Route 66 and reviewed the plans and other information related to this project. I feel this is a high quality development which would be an asset to our community and wanted to express my support, Thank you for your consideration and please feel free to call with any questions. Sincerely, ~vL ~, Ben Mackall CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~ONGA P243 June 7, 2007 The Planning Commission The City Council -"'' - Attn: Vance Pomeroy •- ,~ City of Rancho Cucamonga - - 10500 Ci~ric Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Arbors at Route 66 TTb418179 ~~; ..~~~ Honorable Commissioners and City Council Members: '_~„'' My firm and I represent and manage some of the retail properties across from this project in the city of Upland, in which we accommodate over 35 retail businesses. We have met with the developers and re~riewed the plans and other information related to this project. ~X/e feel this is a high quality development which would be an asset to the area and wanted to express our support. - Thank you for your consideration and please feel free to call with any questions. Sincerely, ~_ k EI Tine roperty Manager MET%td CENTURY COMMERCIAL 1081 S. Grand Avenue Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Direct 909.612.2165 Faa 909.861.2443 P244 June 18, 2007 From: Marcella Edwards 6526 Amethyst Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 D.L. 909-319-5729 To: The Planning Commission The City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729 Attention: Vance Pomeroy Re: Arbors at Route 66 TTM 18179 Honorable Commissioners and City Council Members: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JUN 2 0 2UU7 RECEIVED -PLANNING I have met with the developers of the Arbors at Route 66 and reviewed the plans and other information related to the project. I was quite impressed and feel this is a high quality development which would be an asset to Rancho Cucamonga and wanted to express my support. Thank you for your consideration and please feel free to call with any questions. Sincerely, ~~~~~ Marcella Edwards P.J. Partridge 8445 Valle Vista Place Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 909-949-0123 June 7, 2007 The Planning Commission The City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive .Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729 Attention: Vance Pomeroy Re: Arbors at Route 66' TTM 18179 Honorable Commissioners and City Council Members: ~ ~7 T 'P245~ ~'; ~-~ ,.~ / r _ ~1 ~ `"~^Er r'~~ I have reviewed the plans and other information related to this project and met with the developers. I feel that this is a high quality development which would be an asset to our community and wanted to express my support. Thank you for your consideration and please .feel free to caH me with any.. questions. Sincerely, PJ. Partridge P246 June 14, 2007 Julie Martinez Tar6ell Realtors 4085 Grand Ave., Chino, CA 909.260-9026 The Planning Commission The City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729 Attention: Vance Pomeroy Re: Arbors at Route 66 TTM 18179 Honorable Commissioners and City Council Members: I am a realtor in the area and 1 have met with the developers and reviewed the plan's and other information related to this project I feel that this is a high quality development which would bean asset to our community and wanted to express my support. _ Thank you for your consideration and please feel free to call me with any questions. Sincerely, p0 ~~ aa- lie Martinez Z0/Z0 39Cd 9NIQt121~J 0008 6b:ZS L00Z/5Z/90 P247 Joel D. Cleliand 1339 Alta Avenue, Upland, CA 91786 (909) 920-6414 June 15, 2007 The Planning Commission The City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Attention: Vance Pomeroy Re: Arbors at Route bb TTM 18179 Honorable Commissioners and City Council Members: CITY OF RANCHO CUCANiONGA JUN 2 6 2007 RECEIVED -PLANNING I have spoken with the developers of the Arbors at Route 66 and reviewed the plans and other information related to this project. I feel this is a high quality development which would be an asset to our community and wanted to express my support. Thank you for your consideration and please feel free to call with any questions. Have a good day. Sincerely, Joel D. Clelland P248 d~O COMMUNITY HOSPITAL June 22, 2007 Jug z s zoos Vance Pomeroy Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga Deaz Vance, CITY OF RANCHO ""~-4fU,ON6A RECEIVED - PLANI~IiNG On behalf of the Boazd of Trustees and the management team at San Antonio Community Hospital, I would like to express our support for the Arbors at Route 66_project that is going to the Planning Commission on June 27, 2007. The hospital has owned this property for a number of years and had been considering some type of medical development. The Arbors project however is more compatible with the neighborhood, and the proceeds from the sale will be used to expand needed services on our existing hospital campus. We believe this is a `win' for the neighbors in that traffic and congestion with the Arbors project will be significantly less than medical development and the project will create an attractive entry into the city. We also believe that the project adds valuable housing, which will undoubtedly be attractive to new clinical staff moving into the azea. We understand the concerns of the neighbors but do not feel that the project itself is the problem. The issue of traffic flow through their neighborhoods is an existing concern, and one that should not be significantly impacted by this well-designed and well-planned development. Since eiy, i Steven C. Moreau President and CEO ~~On behalf of the Board of Trustees of San Antonio Community Hospital P249 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:10 p.m. Vance Pomeroy March 20, 2007 PRJ2006-00094: FOOTHILL AND GROVE MIXED USE -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC - Office/SFRlfownhouse/Live/Work Master Plan project with condominium map, General Plan Amendment, Development Code Amendment, and Development District Amendment. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00223 - ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC - A request to change the land use designation for four parcels on Red Hill Country Club Drive from Open Space to Mixed Use to be consistent with the Mixed Use land use designation at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue, to add these same four parcels to Section 2.5.5.4 Western Gateway in the Bear Gulch Area and amend associated Table III-7 to increase the maximum number of dwelling units from 231 to 304, and to establish a Master Plan Overlay District for this project site on the Land Use Plan in accordance with Section 111.2.4.1 of the General Plan -APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 and 45. Related Files: Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, -Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16179, Development Review DRC2006-00341. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2006-00350- ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC - A request to change the zoning for four parcels on Red Hill Country Club Drive from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Mixed Use to be consistent with the Mixed Use zoning designation; Establish a Master Plan Overlay District for the project site on the Development District Map in accordance with Section 17.20.030 of the Development Code; at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue - APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43 .and 45. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, Tentative Tract Map Sl16TT18179, Development Review DRC2006-00341. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2007-00029 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC - A request to change the table for the Bear Gulch Mixed-Use area contained in Development Code Section 17.32.020.0.3 to increase the maximum number of dwelling units from 231 to 304 - APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, and 45. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District: Amendment DRC2006-00350, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179, Development Review DRC2006-00341. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00341 -.ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC -Master Plan for two 2-story office buildings, 7 LiveNVork units, 68 town homes, and 23 single-family residences at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue in the Mixed Use Zone of Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts. APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 416 43, 44, and 45. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC -Condominium subdivision of two lots with office condominiums in two office buildings on Lot 1, and residential condominiums in 7 Live/1Nork units, 68 town homes, and 23 single-family residences on Lot 2 at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue in the Mixed Use Zone of Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts. APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44, and 45. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, and Development Review DRC2006-00341. EXHIBIT T P250 DRC ACTION AGENDA PRJ2006-00094, DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT18179, AND DRC2006-00341 March 20, 2007 Page 2 Development Request Parameters: The overall project request aims to develop six parcels as one mixed-use development. The project has several components which require discussion to better exhibit the design issues: This project includes six parcels which are proposed to be included in a mixed use development. The four easterly parcels are now General Plan designated as Open Space but within a Low Residential Development District and are outside the Foothill Boulevard Districts. The General Plan Amendment and Development District and Code Amendments, in part, would include them into the same Foothill Boulevard District and Mixed Use land use designation and Development District as the other two parcels to allow for a comprehensive development pattern. 2. The General Plan and the Foothill Boulevard Districts Chapter of the Development Code establish, through the use of a Land Use Mix Table, a maximum of 231 dwelling units for the Bear Gulch Mixed Use area.-The applicant is requesting to construct 98 dwelling units in the proposed projedt,' but 206 units have already been entitled for construction in the Bear Gulch Mixed Use area on other parcels. The General Plan and the Development Code must be amended to allow a maximum of at least 304 dwelling units-for this proposal. 3. A Master Plan Overlay District is requested to be established for the project site. The designation and the Master Plan itself will allow flexibility in the site planning for the site to address unique design-related issues where. development policy may not provide the best solution. 4. The project proposes a subdivision for condominium purposes across two lots: Lot 1 provides for the subdivision of office space in the approximately 12,600 square foot office buildings; Lot 2 provides for the subdivision of the various dwelling units into 98 residential condominiums - 7 live/work units, 66 townhouses and 23 detached single-family units. 5. Design review of the buildings and their relationship with the surrounding streetscape and the requirements of Foothill Boulevard. Districts Subarea 1, The project site and the proposed development pose several challenges. The traffic issues with relation to Grove Avenue, the Foothill and Grove intersection, and the impacts on Red Hill Country Club Drive have raised the most questions from neighbors making inquiries to staff. In addition, the Mixed Use and the Master Plan issues for reducing some of the development standards are important for discussion. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: P251 DRC ACTION AGENDA PRJ2006-00094, DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT18179, AND DRC2006-00341 March 20, 2007 Page 3 Traffic -The proposed project has been analyzed by the applicant's traffic engineers, and the resulting report has been reviewed and accepted by the City's Traffic Engineer. Based on standard industry standards, the project will generate 1,130 daily trips if the office buildings are medical. The project will generate 82 two-way trips in the a.m. peak hour and 111 two-way trips in the p.m. peak hour, both significantly less than the 250 two way trips which would trigger a Traffic Impact Analysis required under the county's Congestion Management Program. The project proposes two ingress/egress points. The point along Grove Avenue is full access for all users and tenants in both the residential portion and-the office portion. The point along Red Hill Country Club Drive is for emergency access only and will be gate-protected for that purpose. The traffic generated by the project will access the site through the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue. The daily trips and the peak hour trips will not increase the Level of Service (LOS) beyond the acceptable LOS C that it operates under today. Substantial concern has been voiced over the traffic impact of the project on trips that will use the local residential streets on Red Hill to shortcut up or down from Base Line Road. The traffic analysis, based on industry standards, City-generated traffic counts from April 2006 and other information provided by the City's Traffic Engineer, shows that the project will generate an additional four (4) a.m. peak-hour trips and zero (O) p.m. peak-hour trips with a total daily traffic increase of 0.6 percent over current levels. Part of these numbers are based on the Central School District information that the district anticipates the project to generate approximately 17 (total) children (K-8), some of whom will attend Valle Vista School on Red Hill. Based on current information on the Central School District website, enrollment for this school site is projected to drop. The applicant instructed their traffic engineers to prepare analysis of alternate development scenarios as part of their study. With the residential unit count and the amount of either medical office or retail uses more in keeping with the mix anticipated in the General Plan, the subject proposal would generate about 17 percent of what an office-heavy scenario would generate and about 28 percent of what aretail-heavy scenario would generate. Staff analysis of .an additional scenario that uses the current residential unit limitation of 25 single-family units and medical office buildings up to the 70 percent mix targeted in the General Plan, at the same efficiency obtained by the applicant's proposal, show that the subject proposal would generate about 44 percent of what this conservative scenario would generate. 2.. Mixed Use -The General Plan designates large portions of the western end of Foothill Boulevard as Mixed Use, including the subject site. This area is known alternately as the Western Foothill Corridor -Western Gateway and as Bear Gulch. The discussion for this area in the General Plan focuses on the mix of uses anticipated based on the location, the anticipated uses, the (then) current level of commercial vitality, and the types of activity expected to occur there. P252 DRC ACTION AGENDA PRJ2006-00094, DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT18179, AND DRC2006-00341 March 20, 2007 Page 4 The mix of uses is shown in the following table: TABLE III-7 WESTERN FOOTHILL CORRIDOR -WESTERN GATEWAY • Acreage Range , Percent • Average Danslty (dulacre) Estimatetl "Most Case' Land Use Range Dwelling Unlts Acres/Dwelling Units (du) Commercial -retail, 50 percent - 27.5 - 38.5 acres 38.5 acres service 70 percent Commercial, tourist commercial, office (commercial and . professional Residential 30 percent - 16.5 - 27.5 acres ®14 du/acre' 16.5 acres ®14 dWacre' 50 percent 231 to 365 dwelling units 231 dwelling units TOALS 100 oercent 55 acres 55 acres 1. Indicates target density not a range. Actual denstty may increase up to 20 du/acre es long as the total of 231 dwallingunits is not exceeded As shown, the anticipated mix is skewed toward commercial uses rather than residential. In addition, the broad ranges in the land use categories that were targeted for this area are noted in the General Plan to "allow a high degree of flexibility and responsiveness to the market." The applicant contends that the market is such that skewing their project to the most residentially heavy side of these ranges is still far from what the market will accept. Retail uses are not appropriate for this location considering the .nearby vacancies. The applicant also contends that the traffic impacts if the site was developed within the General Plan ranges would be too severe to be acceptable to the neighbors and to the City. In addition to market demands recognized by the General Plan, the limitation on the number of dwelling units in the entire area creates a burden on the reasonable development of the site. The chart (and a similar chart in the Development Code) shows that there can be no more than 231 dwelling units in the entire area. This limit has been approached by the cumulative entitlement of 206 dwelling units in Bear Gulch. The remaining 25 units that would be permitted under this area-wide limitation would restrict the developer to filling as little as 3 acres of the 10 acre site with these 25 units and the balance of the land would go to commercial uses. The request is to increase the limitation on the number of dwelling units by 73 units to 304 to permit the proposed project. 3. Master Planning -The General Plan and the Development Code both address the use of a Master Plan Overlay District as a way to attend to the unique and special characteristics of a development site to solve problems and address "issues that may not be readily resolved through conventional zoning designations or site development standards." (Section 111.2.4.1, Rancho Cucamonga General Plan.) The proposed project is designed to seamlessly blend the several use types together while allowing for sufficient segregation to prevent any incompatibilities. In doing so, the applicant has been able to meet most all of the development standards for the applicable zones and uses. However, the applicant is proposing that several development standards be relaxed in order to provide a better site design. P253 DRC ACTION AGENDA PRJ2006-00094, DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT18179, AND D RC2006-00341 March 20, 2007 Page 5 As provided on a comprehensive comparison table (attached), the applicant is requesting the following: • Average setbacks be allowed in lieu of the required discreet setback calculation for units along Red Hill Country Club Drive and the office building at the corner. • Height limit setback for the office building in the Foothill Boulevard District Parkway designation be reduced along both Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue. • The private open space requirement for the town homes and Live/Work units be relaxed to allow an average calculation for the units for the ground floor and allow the upstairs space to be counted. • That the building separation measurement between the town home buildings and the driveway curb be reduced td 11 feet for both two--and three-story portions of the town home buildings. The applicant justifies the reduced setbacks, reduced separation from the driveway curbs, and the reduced ground floor open space for the town homes by explaining that the town home clusters better effect the layout design for the site. By affecting the clusters of town homes, a more autonomous relationship is made for each cluster and additional open space is provided in more meaningful locations, not only in the large common open space areas, but also in the court spaces enveloped within each town home cluster. The applicant also justifies the flexibility for the office building by noting that the siting of the building meets the overarching intent of the Foothil! Boulevard-Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan (VIP). This plan specifies the design requirements for the entry gateways to the City on Foothill Boulevard including various street furniture and other accents. For the Western Gateway at Grove Avenue, the plan states that this intersection "should incorporate large accent setbacks" (Section III.A). The office building design provides a symmetrical L-shaped arrangement with an attractive entry toward the corner that is set back a significant distance. However, by locating and arranging the building on the site to achieve the requirements of the VIP, it does require that some of the development standards be relaxed. The Master Plan Overlay District would allow such flexibility. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. The applicant has made a serious effort to comply with the architectural requirements for the Foothill Boulevard Districts including compatibility with the community design palette for the subarea. Staff finds the design mixture appropriate. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, Diaz Staff Planner: Vance Pomeroy The Committee recommended that a task force consisting of, at minimum, two members of the City Council and two Planning Commissioners be formed to provide a broader opportunity for P254 DRC ACTION AGENDA PRJ2006-00094, DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT18179, AND DRC2006-00341 March 20, 2007 Page 6 constructive design input. In lieu of this opportunity for correction to the project, the Committee continued the item to give the applicant an opportunity to revise the project based on the following comments: Work on the office building design. Amore substantial corner treatment that provides critical visual focus for the entire project site is needed. An increase in the height of the corner element may be an important change and allowable under the Master Plan Overlay review. Also, the architectural cues given by the Magic Lamp and the Sycamore Inn should be better represented in the design of the building, including the color palette, the use of materials such as wrought iron, and other characteristic features. 2. Provide better exhibits to demonstrate the broad design aspects of the development: more streetscapes, view line studies (especially as they pertain to the three-story elements), perspective studies of the town home clusters, etc. 3. The Committee recognizes that the project exceeds the minimum parking requirements, but sees a potential parking conflict between the office and the residential portions of the project with respect to the use of the office parking area by residents. Clear and enforceable language in the Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions (CC&Rs) for both portions should be included to resolve this issue while making allowances for off-hour use of the office parking area by residents during non-business hours. Bring that language back for staff and Committee review. 4. The live/work units have some potential to create conflicts with the office uses and the residential uses: Clear and enforceable language in the CC&Rs is needed to control these potentially incompatible uses and prevent unacceptable parking problems that may result. Bring that language back for staff and Committee review. 5. The Committee accepted the traffic report conclusions respecting the quantity and flow of traffic generated by the project. However, the Committee believed that southbound Grove Avenue left-turn movements onto eastbound Foothill Boulevard would benefit from a signal-controlled left-turn lane. P255 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:30 p.m. Vance Pomeroy May 1, 2007 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00223 - ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC - A request to change the land use designation for four parcels on Red Hill Country Club Drive from Open Space to Mixed Use to be consistent with the Mixed Use land use designation at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue, to add these same four parcels to Section 2.5.5.4 Western Gateway in the Bear Gulch area, and to establish a Master Plan Overlay District for this project site on the Land Use Plan in accordance with Section 111.2.4.1 of the General Plan --APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44, and 45. Related Files: Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179, and Development Review DRC2006-00341. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC - A request to change the zoning for four parcels on Red Hill Country Club Drive from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Mixed Use to be consistent with the Mixed Use zoning designation; establish a Master Plan Overlay District for the project site on the Development District Map in accordance with Section 17.20.030 of the Development Code, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue -APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44, and 45. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179, and Development Review DRC2006-00341. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2007-00029 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66; LLC - A request to change the table for the Bear Gulch Mixed-Use area contained in Development Gode Section 17.32.020.0.3 to include the "Most Case" column found in the General Plan Table III-7 - APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44, and 45. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179, and Development Review DRC2006-00341. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTTi 6179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC -Condominium subdivision of two lots with office condominiums in two office buildings on Lot 1 and residential condominiums in 7 Live/Work units, 68 town homes, and 23 single-family residences on Lot 2 at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue in the Mixed Use Zone of Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts. APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44, and 45. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, and Development Review DRC2006-00341. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC - A master plan for two 2-story office buildings, 7 LiveNVork units, 68 town homes, and 23 single-family residences at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue in the Mixed Use Zone of Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts, including a change in the use combinations and proportions found in General Plan Table III-7. APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44, and 45. Related Files: General Pfan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006 00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179. Background: The Design Review Committee continued this project from the March 20, 2007, meeting with the following recommendations: Work on the design of the office building. Amore substantial corner treatment that provides critical visual focus for the entire project site is needed. An increase in the height EXHIBIT U P256 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2006-00233, DRC00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT18179, AND DRC2006-00341 - ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC May 1, 2007 Page 2 of the corner element may be an important change and allowable under the Master Plan Overlay review. Also, the architectural cues given by the Magic Lamp and the Sycamore Inn should be better represented in the design of the building including the color palette, the use of materials such as wrought iron, and other characteristic features. 2. Provide better exhibits to demonstrate the broad design aspects of the development: more streetscapes, view line studies (especially as they pertain to the three-story elements), perspective studies of the town home clusters, etc. 3. The Committee recognizes that the project exceeds the minimum parking requirements, but sees a potential parking conflict between the office and the residential portions of the project with respect to the use of the office parking area by residents. Clear and enforceable language in the Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions (CC&Rs) for both portions should be included to resolve this issue while making allowances for off-hour use of the office parking area by residents during non-business hours, Bring that language back for staff and Committee review. 4. The live/work units have some potential to create conflicts with the office uses and the residential uses. Clear and enforceable language in the CC&Rs is needed to control these. potentially incompatible uses and prevent unacceptable parking problems that may result. Bring that language back for staff and Committee review. In addition, the Committee accepted the traffic report conclusions respecting the quantity and flow of traffic generated by the project. However, the Committee believed that the southbound Grove Avenue left-turn movements onto the eastbound Foothill Boulevard would benefit from a signal-controlled left-turn lane. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: The applicant has re-designed the office building to incorporate the comments of the Committee. The center/corner rotunda massing has been emphasized by increasing its height and providing visual clues that accentuate its verticality including roof stepping, materials and window shapes. Further increases in the prominence of the corner could be derived by increasing height, bolder colors and materials, or more intense design features; these could take the design away from the direction the Committee intended. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: The applicant has worked with staff on the CC&R language to assure residential usage of the office parking during off hours and the use of the parking lot by the live/work businesses. P257 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2006-00233, DRC00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT18179, AND DRC2006-00341 - ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC May 1, 2007 Page 3 Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, Diaz Staff Planner: Vance Pomeroy The Committee recommended approval of the project to the Planning Commission subject to the following: The applicant should be conditioned to provide studies necessary to determine if a protected left-turn signal for southbound Grove Avenue onto Foothill Boulevard is required and install it subject to CalTrans approval, if necessary. 2. The applicant shall provide a . thorough and complete computer-generated three-dimensional "drive-through" of the project showing of the various aspects both on the inside and the outside, including live/work units, parking areas, office building, single-family units, multiple-family units,. courtyards, open space, street views, etc. The moving picture file must be compatible with the City's systems. 3. The office building shall incorporate attractive security measures in the design of any gates for the office building and the surrounding area. 4. The office building should include significant off-lighting accents. A tasteful and innovative sign program designed within the design constraints of the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan must be an important part of the final design. m Arbors at Route 66 Proposed and Alternate Land Uses Daily Trip Generation rroposed Land Use Proposal (General Office) 23 Single Family Homes /75 Townhomes / 12,610 sf Genera/Office Original Land Use Proposal (Medical Office) 23 Single Family Homes / 75 Townhomes / 13, 000 sf Medical Office Alternate Land Use (Large Retail Center) 95,000 sf Shopping Center/25 Townhomes Alternate Land Use (Large Medical Office) 180, 000 sf Medical Office / 4 Single Family Homes Daily Trips 799 1,130 4,105 6,541 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual. 7th Edition N - cn ao P259 ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 MIXED-USE PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared for ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC Prepared by ^ . CONSULTING 14725 ALTON PARKWAY, IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92618-2027 CONTACT: BOB MATSON 949.472.3505 bobmatson@rbf.com March 20, 2007 JN 10-105035 EXHIBIT W P260 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION .............................:...................................................... ....................................2 Study Area .............................................................................................. ....................................2 Intersection Analysis Methodology .......................................................... ............................:.......2 Intersection Performance Criteria ............................................................ ....................................3 Intersection Thresholds of Significance ................................................... ....................................3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ...............................:........................................ ....................................3 Roadway Descriptions .............:........................:..................................... ....................................3 Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes ........................................................ ....................................4 Existing Conditions Peak Hour Intersection LOS .................................... ....................................4 PROPOSED PROJECT .......................................................................... .....:..............................4 Forecast Trip Generation of proposed project ......................................... ....................................5 Forecast Trip Distribution of Proposed Project ........................................ ....................................5 Forecast Trip Assignment of Proposed Project ....................................... ................:...................6 FORECAST EXISTING WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS ........................................ ....................6 Forecast Existing With Project Conditions Traffic Volumes ..................................... ....................6 Forecast Existing With Project Conditions Intersection Peak Hour LOS .................. ....................6 TRIP GENERATION OF ALTERNATIVE LAND USE SCENARIOS ........................ ....................7 FORECAST VALLE VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL RELATED TRIPS ................ ....................9 MITIGATION MEASURES ...................................................................................... ..................10 CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................... ..................10 APPENDIX A EXISTING COUNT DATA APPENDIX B LOS ANALYSIS SHEETS APPENDIX C CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT LETTER P261 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 LOS & Delay Ranges for Signalized Intersections ............................................. .........3 Table 2 Existing Conditions AM & PM Peak Hour Intersection LOS ............................... .........4 Table 3 ITE Trip Rates of Proposed Project ................................................................... .........5 Table 4 Forecast Trip Generation of Proposed Project .................................................. .........5 Table 5 Forecast Trip Percent Distribution of Proposed Project .........................:........... .........6 Table 6 Forecast Existing With Project Conditions AM & PM Peak Hour Intersection LOS .................................................................................................................. .........6 Table 7 ITE Trip Rates of Land Use Scenarios .............................................................. .........8 Table 8 Forecast Trip Generation of Land Use.Scenarios .............................................. .........8 Table 9 Forecast Elementary School-Related Trips Students from Proposed Project .... .........9 Table 10 Red Hill Country Club Drive Average Daily Traffic ............................'.....:........... .......10 LIST OF EXHIBITS Follows Page Exhibit 1 Regional Project Location ............................................................................ ........2 Exhibit 2 Proposed Project Site Location .................................................................... ........2 Exhibit 3 Study Intersection Location .......................................................................... ........2 Exhibit 4 Existing AM/PM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes ........................................ ........4 Exhibit 5 Existing Study Intersection/Roadway Geometry ........................................... ........4 Exhibit 6 Proposed Project Site Plan ........:................................................................. ........4 Exhibit 7 AM Forecast Percent Trip Distribution of Proposed Project ......................... ........5 Exhibit 8 PM Forecast Percent Trip Distribution of Proposed Project ......................... ........5 Exhibit 9 Forecast AM/PM Peak Hour Trip Assignment of Proposed Project .............. ........6 Exhibit 10 Forecast Existing With Project AM/PM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes ..... ........6 P262 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study analyzes the forecast traffic impacts associated with the proposed Arbors at Route 66 Mixed-Use project located at the northeast corner of the Foothill Boulevard/Grove Avenue intersection in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The proposed project consists of 12,610 square feet of general office, 23 single-family dwelling units, and 75 townhouse style condominium dwelling units. The project site currently contains agricultural land uses and three single-family dwelling units, all of which will be displaced by the proposed project. Site access to the proposed mixed-use project is planned via a full access driveway at Grove Avenue with an emergency adcess only to Red Hill Country Club Drive. It is worth noting, since the proposed Arbors at Route 66 Mixed-Use project is forecast to generate less than 250 two-way a.m. peak hour trips (69 two-way trips in the a.m. peak hour) and less than 250 two-way p.m. peak hour trips (82 two-way trips in the p.m. peak hour), preparation of a SANBAG Congestion Management Program (CMP) TIA is not required for the proposed project according to CMP TIA guidelines. The Foothill Boulevard (SR-66)/Grove Avenue intersection is currently operating at an acceptable LOS (LOS D or better) according to City of Rancho Cucamonga performance criteria. The proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 799 daily trips, which includes approximately 69 a.m. peak hour trips and approximately 82 p.m. peak hour trips. This analysis conservatively assumes no trip generation reduction associated with the three displaced single- family dwelling units and commercial activity related to the strawberry farm sales and Christmas tree sales. With the addition of project-generated trips, the Foothill Boulevard (SR-66)/Grove Avenue intersection is forecast to continue operating at LOS C, an acceptable LOS (LOS D or better) for forecast existing with project conditions according to City of Rancho Cucamonga performance criteria. A 0.44 percent increase in daily traffic on Red Hill Country Club Drive is forecast to occur related to dropping off/picking up elementary school age students forecast to be generated by the proposed project. Based on City-established thresholds of significance, the addition of project-generated trips at the Foothill Boulevard (SR-66)/Grove Avenue intersection is forecast to not result in any significant impacts. Based on City of Rancho Cucamonga thresholds of significance, no mitigation measures are required for the proposed project. The proposed project is forecast to generate less traffic as compared to three alternative allowable land use scenarios. P263 INTRODUCTION This study analyzes the forecast traffic impacts associated with the proposed Arbors at Route 66 Mixed-Use project located at the northeast corner of the Foothill Boulevard/Grove Avenue intersection in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The proposed project consists of 12,610 square feet of general offce, 23 single-family dwelling units, and 75 townhouse style condominium dwelling units. The project site currently contains agricultural land uses and three single-family dwelling units, all of which will be displaced by the proposed project. Site access to the proposed mixed-use project is planned via a full access driveway. at.Grove Avenue with an emergency access only to Red Hill Country Club Drive. Exhibit 1 shows the regional project location. Exhibit 2 shows the location of the project site. It is worth noting, since the proposed Arbors at Route 66 Mixed-Use project is forecast to generate less than 250 two-way a.m, peak hour trips (69 two-way trips in the a.m. peak hour) and less than 250 two-way p.m. peak hour trips (82 two-way trips in the p.m. peak hour), preparation of a SANBAG Congestion Management Program (CMP) TIA is not required for the proposed project according to CMP TIA guidelines. Study Area City of Rancho Cucamonga staff identified the following intersection for analysis in this study: Foothill Boulevard (SR-66)/Grove Avenue (Signalized). Exhibit 3 shows the location of the study intersection. As requested by City of Rancho Cucamonga staff, the study intersection is analyzed for the following study scenarios: Existing Conditions; and Forecast Existing With Project Conditions. Intersection Analysis Methodology Level of service (LOS) is commonly used as a qualitative description of intersection operation and is based on the'type of traffic control and delay experienced at the intersection. The 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) analysis methodology for Signalized Intersections is utilized to determine the operating LOS of the study intersection. The 2000 HCM analysis methodology describes the operation of an intersection using a range of LOS from LOS A (free-flow conditions) to LOS F (severely congested conditions), 'based on the corresponding ranges of stopped delay experienced per vehicle for unsignalized intersections shown in Table 1. WALNUT FULLERTON Not to Scale i r-~n ylz m m~Z yl0 n O OIn O Regional Project Location N:bas~avo~osoast~amcu.~n~e~n~w.a~ sevrzo~ EXhlblt 1~ O Not to Scale ^ ^ ^ Legend: -- • -- Project Site Boundary Proposed P H.~ydalell OlO5e3STaRC1ExM1lEilslEdAZ.ai SEPlzee6 Site Location Exhibit ~ rn (J7 D. Nol to Scale ^ . ^ Legend: - Project Sile Boundary • Study lnterseclion M:\ptlab\1010503STrafiklEahipib\Exh03al SEP/]0p6 Intersection Location N Exhibit 3 ~ P267 Table 1 LOS & Defay Ranges for Signalized Intersections LOS Delay (seconds) A c 10.0 B 10.1 to < Z0.0 C ~ 20.1 to < 35.0 D 35.1 to < 55.0 E 55.1 to < 80.0 F > 80.0 ouurce: i ransponeuon rtesearcn ooara, rvgnway capaaty Manual, HCM 2000 Edition (Washington D.C., 2000). Level of service is based on the average stopped delay per vehicle for all movements of signalized intersections. Intersection Performance Criteria The City of Rancho Cucamonga target for peak hour intersection operation is LOS D or better. Intersection Thresholds of Significance To determine whether the addition of project-generated trips results in a significant impact at a study intersection, and thus requires mitigation, the City of Rancho Cucamonga utilizes the following threshold of significance: A significant project-related impact occurs if the addition of project-generated trips causes an intersection operating at LOS D or better to operate at a deficient LOS (LOS E or F); or if a project adds traffic to any intersection operating at an unacceptable LOS (LOS E or F). EXISTING CONDITIONS Roadway Descriptions The characteristics of the roadway system in the vicinity of the project area are described below: Foothill Boulevard (SR-66) in the project vicinity is a four-lane divided roadway with a continuous left-turn lane trending in an east-west direction. It should be noted that City of Rancho Cucamonga is planning to widen Foothill Boulevard in the project vicinity to a six-lane divided roadway with a landscaped raised median. Grove Avenue north of Foothill Boulevard in the project vicinity is a four-lane undivided roadway trending in a north-south direction. Grove Avenue transitions into atwo-lane undivided 3 P268 roadway north of the project site. South of Foothill Boulevard, Grove Avenue is a four-lane divided roadway with araised/painted median. Red Hill Country Club Drive is a two-lane undivided roadway trending in a north-south direction. Red Hill Country Club Drive terminates on the south at Foothill Boulevard. Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes This analysis utilizes City-provided a.m. and p.m. peak hour intersection movement counts taken in April 2006. The a.m. peak period intersection counts were taken from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., and the p.m. peak period intersection counts were taken from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. The counts used in this analysis were taken from the highest hour within the peak period counted. Exhibit 4 shows existing a.m, and p.m. peak hour volumes at the study intersections; detailed traffic count data is contained in Appendix A. Exhibit 5 shows existing study intersection/roadway circulation geometry. Existing Conditions Peak Hour Intersection LOS Table 2 summarizes existing conditions a.m. and p.m, peak hour LOS of the Foothill Boulevard (SR-66)/Grove Avenue intersection; detailed LOS analysis sheets are contained in Appendix B. Table 2 Existing Conditions AM 8 PM Peak Hour Intersection LOS Stud Int ti AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour y ersec on Delay LOS Delay LOS Foothill Blvd (SR-66)/Grove Ave 21.6 C 24.4 C Note: Delay is shown in seconds per vehicle. As shown in Table 2, the Foothill Boulevard (SR-66)/Grove Avenue intersection is currently operating at an acceptable LOS (LOS D or better) according to City of Rancho Cucamonga performance criteria. PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed Arbors at Route 66 Mixed-Use project located at the northeast corner of the Foothill Boulevard/Grove Avenue intersection in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The proposed project consists of 12,610 square feet of general office, 23 single-family dwelling units, and 75 townhouse style condominium dwelling units. The project site currently contains agricultural land uses and three single-family dwelling units, all of which will be displaced by the proposed project. Site access to the proposed mixed-use project is planned via a full access driveway at Grove Avenue with an emergency access only to Red Hill Country Club Drive. Exhibit 6 shows the proposed project site plan. 4 ~ '' ~ ; I ~ ~ ~ ~ : : o ' PROJECT '~ SITE ': m ~ : : ~ : r : ~ c.~-n i N ~ `S ~ O i~ `Q :~867 36 ~ 586 1288 f 1 ~~,_. __._ -.. ~ ~ r F RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DR 26736 ,, p OT ', , N7~C R7 i,~ nrnv Legend: Project Site Boundary Nol to Scale ~~ AM/PM Intersection Volumes Existing AM/PM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes N x:ba~e~ioioso3sT~aRC~E.hidlslExhoa.m sevnoos EXhIbIY 4 ~ Legend ~- Existing Lane ^ Signal-Controlled Intersection 2U 2-lane Undivided Roadway NOf YO Scale 4U 4-lane Undivided Roadway 4D 41ane Divided Roadway Existing Study Intersection/Roadway Geometry N naPaawnoioso3sT~m~v=,m~e~~Exnas.m SEP(20o6 Exhibit 5 p 2e ~, : J Proposed Site Plan n:yae~eu oiasoasr,am~mien~~.nos.d nwarzoo~ _~ B N V Not to Scale ~ ~ ~ Project Site Boundary P272 Forecast Trip Generation of proposed project To calculate trips forecast to be generated by the proposed project, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation rates were used in this analysis. Table 3 summarizes ITE trip generation rates used to calculate the number of trips forecast to be generated by the proposed project. Table 3 ITE Trip Rates of Proposed Project AM Peak Hour Rates PM Peak Hour Rates Dally Land Use (ITE Code) Units In Out Total In Out Total Trip Rate Single-FamilyOwelling Unlts (210) du 0.19 0.56 0.75 0.64 0.37 1.01 9.57 Residential Condominium/TOwnhouse (230) du 0.07 0.37 0.44 0.35 0.17 0.52 5.66 General Office (710) tsf 1.36 0.19 1.55 0.25 1.24 1.49 11.01 Source: 200317E Trip Generation Manual, 7"' Edition. Note: du =Dwelling Unit; tsf =thousand square feet. Table 4 summarizes trips forecast to be generated by the proposed project utilizing the trip generation rates shown in Table 3. Table 4 Forecast Trip Generation of Proposed Project Land Use AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips Dally In Out Total In Out Total Trips 23 Single-Family Dwelling Units 4 13 17 15 9 24 220 75 CondominiumlTownhouse Dwelling Units 5 28 33 26 13 39 440 12,610 tsf General Office 17 2 19 3 16 19 139 Total Trip Generation 26 43 69 44 38 62 799 note: [s[ = tnousana square feet. As shown in Table 4, the proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 799 daily trips, which includes approximately 69 a.m, peak hour trips and approximately 82 p.m. peak hour trips. This analysis conservatively assumes no trip generation reduction associated with the three displaced single-family dwelling units and commercial activity related to the strawberry farm sales and Christmas tree sales. Forecast Trip Distribution of Proposed Project Exhibits 7 and 8 and Table 5 summarize the forecast trip percent distribution of project- generated trips based on discussions with City staff. 5 ~ r ~ r r ; r ; ~ ~ G~ - ~ i ~ r m • ~ r < ; m ' ~oo% PROJECT ;•- ioo% SITE ~•; ~: ;€ r: ~ ~= ~: ;= .. Not to Scale ~, ~~ ao°i° 20% 20% F 31 °/ opn/~[[ e[Vp -- • -- • Project Site Boundary Outbound Path ••••••••••••• Inbound Path Xx% Trip Percent Distdbutlon Note: No trip distribution is forecast to and from the nodh on Gmve Avenue which conservatively assigns 100 percent of project-related trips to the Foothill BoulevardlGroveAvemse intersection. Trip distdbution forecast to utilize Red Hill Country Club Odve Is related to Valle Vista Elementary School. AM Peak Hour Forecast H:bdalall°t°5o351TraffrclFil~IbiLSlExha].ai SEP/2°°6 Percent Distribution of Proposed Project N Exhibit 7 w ., ~~; A ~ Q ~ m : : ' ' m ' 100% PROJECT ~~ ~•~ ioo% SITE •: ~_ ~s .: ~€ ~: € ~ ~: • 40% ' ' i 9 ~ '3 RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DR ..• 40% Legend: -- • -- • Project Site Boundary FOOTH~ 40% << Outbound Path 20% ' 2p% B~V~ •••••••••••• Inbound Paw XX% ~ Trip Percent Distribution Q Note: No trip distribution is forecast to and from the north on Grove Avenue which conserva0vely assigns 100 percent of project-related trips to the Foothill Boulevard/Grove Avenue Inlersedion . Nol to Scale ~- PM Peak Hour Forecast Trip Percent Distribution of Proposed H:Wtlale1101 e50351TrnRIC1ExAEilslExlA9_°i SEPlt006 N V A P275 Table 5 Forecast Trip Percent Distribution of Proposed Project Project Trip Percent Distribution Peak Hour To North From North To South From South To East From East To West From West Total AM 9% 15% 20% 20% 31% 25% 40% 40% 100% PM 0% 0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 40% 40% 100% ' Note: 1 =Via Red Hill Country Club Drive. As shown in Table 5, based on discussions with City staff, the proposed project is forecast to distribute approximately 20 percent of project trips to Grove Avenue south of Foothill Boulevard and approximately 80 percent of project trips to Foothill Boulevard. Forecast Trip Assignment of Proposed Project Exhibit 9 shows the corresponding assignment of project-generated peak hour trips assuming the percent trip distribution shown in Exhibits 7 and 8. FORECAST EXISTING WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS Forecast Existing With Project Conditions Traffic Volumes Forecast existing with project conditions traffic volumes were derived by adding project- generated trips to existing traffic volumes. Exhibit 10 shows forecast existing with project conditions a.m. and p.m. peak hour intersection volumes. Forecast Existing With Project Conditions Intersection Peak Hour LOS Table 6 summarizes the a.m. peak hour and p.m. peak hour LOS of the study intersections for forecast existing with project conditions; detailed HCM analysis sheets are contained in Appendix B. Table 6 Forecast Existing With Project Conditions AM & PM Peak Hour Intersection LOS Existing Conditions Forecast Existing With Project Conditions Study Intersection AM PM AM pryt Significant Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Impact? Delay- LOS Delay -LOS Delay -LOS Delay -LOS Foothill Blvd (SR-66)/Grove Ave 21.6 - C 24.4 - C 21.8 - C 24.5 - C No Note: Delay is shown in seconds per vehicle. i ; ~ ~ i ~ i ; ; i ; Ll ~ o ~ PROJECT n ~ SITE `~~; < ; m ; ; ~ ~ , ~ ~ ; ~ ~ _h ~ ` i nmr; ; \lp ~ J '~~p//18 _ ~ . -- __ o~o--~ ~1 I r FO "~--._- REDHILICOUNTRYCLUBDR omo O1 ou>o O~l«B1 Vn - Legend: ProjeG Sile Boundary XX/XX AM/PM Intersection Volwnes Not to Scale q10~ Forecast AM/PM Peak Hour Trip Assignment of Proposed Project N H:baelel1010503STraRk~Ediibib1EM09.a SEP20e6 Exhibit 9~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I _ i i ~ i ~ i ~~ ~ o ~ PROJECT `" ~ SITE D ,.' m ' ' m ' m~~ ' i NN` ` ~~Ol ~ ~56//~~1. ~ J { ~ ' _ ,zeiiae ' ~ 0 -- -~ 586/1288 ~ ~ I ~ F - '-' - ~zs/736, non ~-.-- RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DR ~N` OOTNI(C gCVp _~ ~~~ ~~~ v Not to Scale ~~ ~, Legend: -- • -- Project Sile Boundary XX/XX AM/PM Intersection Volumes Forecast Existing With Pro H_ tlala\f 010503STreflk~hibits\E.htO.al SEP/TOOfi ct AM/PM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes N V V P278 As shown in Table 6, with the addition of project-generated trips, the Foothill Boulevard (SR- 66)/Grove Avenue intersection is forecast to continue operating at LOS C, an acceptable LOS (LOS D or better) for forecast existing with project conditions according to City of Rancho Cucamonga performance criteria. As also shown in Table 6 based on City-established thresholds of signifcance, the addition of project-generated trips at the Foothill Boulevard (SR-66)/Grove Avenue intersection is forecast to not result in any significant impacts. It is worth noting, the proposed project would have to generate 2,506 a.m. peak hour trips or 2,220 p.m. peak hour trips to reduce the Foothill Boulevard/Grove Avenue intersection to a deficient LOS (LOS E or worse). TRIP GENERATION OF ALTERNATIVE LAND USE SCENARIOS This section analyzes forecast trip generation associated with four allowable land use scenarios based on current zoning for the project site: • Proposed land use scenario: - 23 single-family dwelling units; 75 condominium/townhouse dwelling units; and 12,610 square feet general office. • Original land use scenario: - 23 single-family dwelling units; - 75 condominium/townhouse dwelling units; and -.13,000 square feet medical office. • Alternative land use scenario 1: - 4single-family dwelling units; and - 180,000 square feet medical office. • Alternative land use scenario 2: -'25 condominium dwelling units; and - 95,000 square feet shopping center. To calculate trips forecast to be generated by the four land use scenarios, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation rates were used in this analysis. Table 7 summarizes ITE trip generation rates used to calculate the number of trips forecast to be generated by the four land use scenarios. 7 P279 Table 7 ITE Trip Rates of Land Use Scenarios AM Peak Hour Rates PM Peak Hour Rates Dally Land Use (ITE Code) Units In Out Total In Out Total Trip Rate Single-Family Dwelling Units (210) du 0.19 0.56 0.75 0.64 0.37 1.01 9.57 Residential Condominium7Townhouse (230) du 0.07 0.37 0.44 0.35 0.17 0.52 5.86 General Office (710) tsf 1.36 0.19 1.55 0.25 1.24 1.49 11.01 Medical Office (720) tsf 1.96 0.52 2.48 ~ 1.00 2.72 3.72 36.13 Shopping Center (820) tsf 0.63 0.40 1.03 1.80 1.95 3.75 42.94 SOUrCe: 2UV3 I l t 1 rl/J GeneraflOO Manual, /"' ttllSlOn. Note: du =Dwelling Unit; tsf =thousand square feet. Table 8 summarizes trips forecast to be generated by the four land use scenarios utilizing the trip generation rates shown in Table 7. Table 8 Forecast Trip Generation of Land Use Scenarios L d U AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips Daily an se t Trips In Out Total In Out To al Proposed Land Use Scenario - 23Single-Family Dwelling Units 4 13 17 15 9 24 220 - 75 Condominium/TOwnhouse Dwelling Units 5 28 33 26 13 39 440 - 12.610 tsf General Office 17 2 19 3 16 19 139 Total Proposed Protect Trip Generation 26 43 69 44 38 62 799 Original Land Use Scenario - 23.Single-Family Dwelling Units - 4 13 17 15 9 24 220 - 75 Condominium(rownhouse Dwelling Units 5 28 33 26 ~ 13 39 440 - 13 tsf Medical Office 25 7 32 ~ 13 35 48 470 Total Original Project Trip Generation 34 46 82 54 57 111 1,130 Altemative Land Use Scenario 1 - 4Single-Family Dwelling Units 1 2 3 3 1 4 38 - 160 lst Medical ice 353 94 ~ 447 180 490 670 6,503 Total Altemative 1 Trip Generation 354 96 450 163 491 674 6,541 Alternative Land Use Scenario 2 - 25 Condominium Dwelling Units 2 9 11 9 4 13 147 - 95 tsf Shopping Center 60 38 98 171 185 356 4,079 ITE Pass-by Reduction (-34% PM) N/A N/A N/A -58 -63 -121 -121 Total Alternative 2 Trip Generation 62 47 109 ~ 122 126 246 4,105 Note: let = [htluSantl Square feet. N/A = NOt applibable. As shown in Table 8, the proposed project is forecast to generate less traffic as compared to three alternative allowable land use scenarios. 8 P280 FORECAST VALLE VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL RELATED TRIPS The proposed project is located within the Central School District and is served by the Valle Vista Elementary School located in the Red Hill neighborhood. Based on data provided by Central School District included in Appendix C, the proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 17 elementary school age students who would attend the Valle Vista Elementary School located in the Red Hill neighborhood. Based on data provided by Laidlaw Education Services staff, a school bus route currently serves students south of Foothill Boulevard and utilizes Red Hill Country Club Drive. Therefore, no new project-related bus trips are forecast to be generated by Valle Vista Elementary School students utilizing District-provided school buses. As shown in Table 9, assuming approximately 25 percent of the 17 project-related elementary school students are driven to school by guardians, approximately 16 elementary school-related daily trips will be added to Red Hill Country Club Drive by guardian transport of students to Valle Vista Elementary. Table 9 Forecast Elementary School-Related Trips Students from Proposed Project Number of Mode of Morning' Forecast Afternoon Forecast Total Forecast Elementary School Transport Number of Trlps Number of Trips Number of Trips Age Students (To & From School) (To & From School) (To & From School) 13 Driven by p p p school bus (See Note) 4 Driven by 8 8 16 guardians Total School Related Trips 18 1 = Morning trips forecast to occur tluring one hour between 7 a.m. and 9 p.m. 2 = Afternoon trips forecast to occur during one hour between 2 p.m. and 4 p.m. Note: Bus stop added to existing bus route currently traveling up and down Red Hill Country Club Drive and serving students south of Foothill Boulevard. As shown in Table 9, the proposed project is forecast to add 16 daily trips (8 trips forecast to occur during the a.m. peak hour and 8 trips forecast to occur during the afternoon non-peak period) to Red Hill Country Club Drive via guardian transport of students. Based on count data provided by City staff, Red Hill Country Club Drive north of Foothill Boulevard currently has an average daily traffic volume of 3,609 vehicles per day. Table 10 shows the increase in daily traffic volume on Red Hill Country Club Drive due to guardians dropping off/picking up elementary school age students forecast to be generated by the proposed project. 9 P281 Table 10 Red Hill Country Club Drive Average Daily Traffic Forecast percent Existing Existing With Increase in Increase Roadway Segment Conditions Project Dally Traffic In Daily Daily Traffic Conditions Traffic Dally Traffic Red Hill Country Club Dr north of Foothill Blvd 3,609 3,625 16 0.44% As shown in Table 10, a 0.44 percent increase in daily traffic on Red Hill Country Club Drive is forecast to occur related to dropping off/picking up elementary school age students forecast to be generated by the proposed project. Based by information provided by Central Unified School District, the Valle Vista Elementary School enrollment during 2005/2006 academic school year was 524 students. Of the 524 Valle Vista Elementary School students, 236 students resided in the Red Hill area west of Vineyard Avenue-Carnelian Street, with the remaining 288 students living east of Vineyard Avenue- Carnelian Street. Based on City-provided information, approximately 651 residences exist in the Red Hill area west of Vineyard Avenue-Carnelian Street. MITIGATION MEASURES Based on City of Rancho Cucamonga thresholds of significance, no mitigation measures are required for the proposed project. CONCLUSIONS The Foothill Boulevard (SR-66)/Grove Avenue intersection is currently operating at an acceptable LOS (LOS D or better) according to City of Rancho Cucamonga performance criteria. The proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 799 daily trips, which includes approximately 69 a.m. peak hour trips and approximately 82 p.m. peak hour trips. This analysis conservatively assumes no trip generation reduction associated with the three displaced single- family dwelling units and commercial activity related to the strawberry farm sales and Christmas tree sales. 10 P282 With the addition of project-generated trips, the Foothill Boulevard (SR-66)/Grove Avenue intersection is forecast to continue operating at LOS C, an acceptable LOS (LOS D or better) for forecast existing with project conditions according to City of Rancho Cucamonga performance criteria. A 0.44 percent increase in daily traffic on Red Hill Country Club Drive is forecast to occur related to dropping off/picking up elementary school age students forecast to be generated by the proposed project. Based on City-established thresholds of significance, the addition of project-generated trips at the Foothill Boulevard (SR-66)/Grove Avenue intersection is forecast to not result in any significant impacts. Based on City of Rancho Cucamonga thresholds of significance, no mitigation measures are required for the proposed project. The proposed project is forecast to generate less traffic as compared to three alternative allowable land use scenarios. H:\pdata1101050351TraifcV,dmin\5035 TIA_03-20-07.doc ~~ P285 TuminB Mwlnw14 CPUnt An.tyW TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT Propmle ny: O.E. TmfBC Sun.7. PROJECT NAME: Rmcho CudmoMa CMP PROJECT NO: ' DATE: DU11fdDOB N-S STREET: Grow Awnw E•W 6TREET: FPIN81 BouNrvuE TIME NO RTH BOUND SOUTH BOUND N43 EABT BOUND WEfiT BOUND E•W PED COVNT LEFT TNRU RIGHT LEFT TNRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT TNRU RICHT LEFT TNRU RIGHT TOTAL NL SL ~ EL WL 07:00-07:10 ZI 21 1Z B ?0 6 BB 2 80 16 17 i57 12 283 0 0 0~ 2 07:16-07:30 07 18 14 18 b 9 i1B Z 119 18 18 237 B 389 0 - 0 0 0 07:30-07;43 S9 iB 23 31 Zd 10 159 ] 110 ]4 10 2(10 7 377 0 0 1 Z 07:43-08:00 97 iZ ZI 18 25 4 118 S 150 23 H 2W 10 501 0 0 0 I 00:00-08;15 JS 13 1B 20 ZB 7 t]D 8 180 37 91 180 1 455 0 0 0 0 08:15118:90 b 3S 14 13 TB 1 122 9 17i 2B >B 212 18 131 0 0 0 2 09:YJCS:49 91 20 i1 32 17 S 110 1 11J 22 b 187 10 ]99 0 0 ~ 0 0 08:458:00 47 15 iB 10 18 4 NO 1 Iii 18 39 174 19 9S1 0 0 0 1 11:00-11:16 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:19-11:90 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 o D o 0 0 0 0 0 o B o 11:3611:u o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o D D o 0 0 0 11:461z:oo 0 0 0 0 0 o D o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:ao-1z:la o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o D o 0 1z:16u:9o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:3612M5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1z:461]:oD B o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o B o 18:00-18:15 3/ iB 21 b to 8 110 7 ]11 20 ZI 237 1B 827 0 0 Z d 16:15-10:]0 79 10 99 - 28 22 ] i&1 0 320 10 0 1BB 10 401 0 0 0 0 18:30.18:45 R 3t 91 22 b S ISB 91 257 30 b 188 30 618 0 0 7 Z 18:45.17:00 14 OB 41 48 92 3 297 10 ]51 28 15 214 20 6/S 0 0 ] 0 17:00.17:15 a7 70 M 44 31 1 209 8 ]]8 96 17 248 1B BB2 0 0 0 1 17:1617:]0 b 82 90 ]/ 28 7 100 11 ]17 40 15 215 b 621 0 0 1 1 17:]0-17:45 >0 IB 92 44 20 A 104 S 2&1 28 27 381 A 872 0 0 0 ] 17:45-18:00 dB 04 28 J4 60 ] 338 28 232 23 19 201 15 038 0 0 0 0 PEAK-HOUR VOLUME ANALYSIS CALCULAT ED P EAK NOUR V OLUM ES-AM ADJL/9TED PEAK HOUR VO LUMES -AM 75 BB 7B 6R 6T BL 9R eT Sl 20 EL WR 18 EL WR 388 ET 07:90-Oe:]0 Wi 881 ET W7 _ 125 ER WL 126 ER Wl NL NT NR NL NT NR 170 e8 7B ngIOULAT ED P EAK Nnl)R Vni 11M ES-Nnn_ N PRIILCTPD Pcnv NnpR Vnl I IMC.C.NmN D B D _ BR BT eL SR 6T BL D DL wr, D a wr. D ET 11:aa12:ao wr D ET MrT _ 0 Eft WL 0 ER WL _ NL NI Nk NL NI NH. 0 0 0 _ CALCULA TED P EAK HOUR V OLU MES-PM ADJUSTE D PEAK HOUR VO LUMc6 PM 14 111 171 _ 9R ST 6L SR eT BL 32 EL WR BB EL WR 1288 ET 10:461]:45 WT 096 ET WT 130 ER WL 70 ER WL Nl NT NR NL NT NR m 109 117 P287 Volumes for: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 Clly: Rancho Cucamonga Project #: 06-3400-001 LDCatlon: Red HIII Country Club Dr e/o Grove Ave AM Period NB SB EB WB PM Perlod NB SB EB WB 00:00 ~ 3 0 12:00 25 19 00:15 4 1 12:15 35 29 00:30 1 0 12;30 31 19 00:45 1 9 1 2 11 12:45 26 119 30 97 216 01:00 2 ~ 0 13:00 Z9 30 01:15 3 0 13:15 30 22 01:30 2 2 13:30 24 40 01:45 3 1D 0 2 12 13:45 20 103 3D 122 225 02:00 2 D 14:00 33 25 02:15 2 0 14:15 26 23 02:30 1 2 19:30 27 31 02:45 ~ 3 8 1 3 11 14:95 36 122 24 103 225 03:00 0 0 15:00 34 29 03:15 1 D 15:15 35 23 03:30 ~ 2 1 ~ 15:30 46 28 03:45 D 3 4 5 B 15:45 31 146 23 103 249 09:00 2 2 1fi:00 41 33 04:15 ~ 1 ~ 2 ~ 16:15 51 25 04:30 2 6 ~ 1fi:30 40 29 04:45 5 SD 3 13 23 36:45 49 176 3D 117 293 05:00 1 4 17:00 71 32 05:15 4 9 17:15 67 29 05:30 6 I1 17:30 55 24 05:45 9 20 13 37 57 17:45 40 233 36 121 354 06:00 9 5 18:00 47 29 Ofi:15 8 26 10:15 47 30 06:30 11 29 18:30 41 24 06:45 11 39 38 % 137 18:45 ~ 2B 163 21 109 267 07:00 20 31 19:00 22 15 07:15 25 94 19:15 17 15 07:30 35 50 19:30 21 11 07:45 21 101 45 170 271 19:45 ~ 29 84 10 51 135 08:00 ~ 21 52 20:00 29 15 06:15 19 4B 20:15 13 8 08:30 15 27 - 20:30 33 15 ' 00:45 19 74 27 ~ 154 226 20:45 1B 66 4' 42 110 09:00 15 25 21:00 11 6 09:15 18 35 23:15 17 B 09:30 20 32 21:30 12 17 09:45 20 73 29 121 194 21:45 16 56 9 40 % 10:00 21 31 22:00 B 8 10:15 31 23 22:15 6 10 10:30 23 ~ 24 22:30 ~ 13 4 10:45 21 96 29 107 203 22:45 5 32 5 27 59 11:00 28 23 Z3:OD B 3 11:15 ~ 30 28 23:15 3 2 11:30 20 ~ 19 23:30 1 1 11:45 28 106 26 96 202 23:45 3 15 2 8 23 Total Vol. 549 808 1357 !317 935 2252 Dally Totals NB SB EB WB Combine6 1666 1743 3609 ~! 1145 ~:~~:0730 tO7:L*~~' ~~ ` ' ' S6:9S, 124! ;. 129 ,~- `'.:195 293'` ~ 2371 ~ 122. O.BS.i ;,...,_._Di94...,.0;a6~. ., :-: ~.. . , .~.:,. .;-.~O:B3 .; :..0:76 P290 Im o I m ~ O In ZZ0 ~ QQ~J ~I u U N vD O 0 I H u M I a..~ a a o a O W I '~ U Y q a a a % .•1 £ m L % o ~ w m N L L 4 I q 0 d 0 Y .w m u e an • q a m a D mF a v . s r O b O V1 m O m D O m O DO D O n m T O m N '1 O p O N p ! O O p I O O D I O O m~ mr ~n ~ 'm y p N .4 O .1 rl 'I rY r1 rl ~ O D O rl rl rl qV o u a U r'I r H O .Y O N O O b ~ O O O O I m Y m N p O p o u rv N i m m o T o " 0 0 0 0 o D l N. ~ o ~ m .T. u„ m o m m o m o T~ m ~ n I ~ e n m r D .I no .In .~ rv o: o D n w D ~w non opoo~ moDOD noivomn noon DTOO ~ o ~o mr .~ r ~ o D nti•'.~ o n nn .. D.. o Do p.. p d: >. _ - •• 2i r VI O m O N N O N O O N O O O O r N r •1 O N p. u: .- v a I N•+ ~ NDn O mn noon I DD D D I o p a D m fi: "\ ~ I I m a 'I N O~ ri •4 r1N rl N I O OONNN L v Y d v O Y a w u Y A m m: m u r D m o m r o r o o r~ 0 0 o e r rv o rv o rv o: O •y Y V `~ U Y F I a U N N, O m O T O O .-I 1 O O O O •4 p p ~ O U d a' . Y\ .rl Y u I L a 1I1 YI b V~ b I m m p p a ~ >.~r a Oh .+ .+o r.. ~ .~.Irvn i o DDrvnrv a E Y 0 ti a Y m I I d O O O O O N r4 r'I O D ..• O p O O 1 ti Y O N n O n Y: C a Y w> a VI Y N O N D N N O N O O N I O T O O 1 O. H •1 O~ O~ C. o.. m a m ~r •.i qY N O Y w ry W• '1 N D N N N O rl .1 O Y O O p rl p u>. g v O r q V T - Y u a Y •1 q rl M N VI O N O N m O O O V O o O O •4 N N m O N • y. a m Y • u N a• m~ n N I N O N O N N N O O ry I O O O D ~ O n O ~ O ~ U~ Y d. d A r n a> w 9 ~ 9 m ~ m i ~ n E m Y r H> a. q I a N "1 •'I O .4 •Y N M N O O O ry n N 0" . U 4 .l r a I I U 9 O I N. U O I u a A. •O . 'D Y . m ti N N N N. V. a O Y >• f I E V n N~ N O 6. 0 0 0 0 0 0 m U U L. U . L Y C .`fin u. m. m . U a N ti •'~ D~ '1 •Y N N N n O O O N ti N 0. N£. m O ' w N D, m O m O Jt N O N O O ry ~ O p O O I m N N p O p Y. N . N r D r D T m m D O m O TOO I O O~ V n r a r V1 ~ O. .] p p . ~ . C w L w V H •y D n .4 .1 O n O O D N •1 N w D. u. x _ _ _ _ ~r o.~Y DY a - - - - cY 0. N O N n O n O O n O D N p O p a N Y\. ~ • •p a I •tl n r O D T m o m I O Om i O '~ P O' ! U n: L r > yr vw m a a •+ •+o n.+ .minn ~~o Do N•~+rv . ur a a Y > Y a u a o a ^l O. A'w D~ r Y 0 J a T 'I m r'I N N N O N O O N a O a p N N N O £: v w F E'U n n m o T r r o o r m o o m i O O ~ O~ V rv ~ ' U Y > w . L M N ~ ~~ a O p i p . V r $ w O w M 1 4 b •4 r'I D •4 r'1 O •i .1 •.~ I£ O O O N ri N N. O. UM' r 0 N O O T O I£ O p O O m rlw N N! O p r. M r •• . 2 r O r O T m O m O O m O T O O ~ U O w s . ~ ~ I ., I am: -a~ u• C : .. .. .. jy qqq .. .. .. I : ~: UST: D "a0 .•.m a~+0 i C .. .~ i R m.-ald°9t>O: v• rL. vvU. .. .. v ~O^'Om EO> ~~0~•C ul aVALGVOL. U: . U w m E • L u i a I£ .+ 4 •. D> .. .. O~ w v v q l >..~ > T U v >£ u r O r •m. ~.{..I. uCI •~Y O 'O 'n .r 9'nr>i CE NI„u0U\>v\ ~n O F q. A v~ D A U I a> L N C a 0 U v a V I A A u •~ N£\ v\ O >.m w 4. d E. O E~ M u 0 I E uri G> U U 4 G ti i ~ A m m n I V m C E T v d Y w • u. U N u. d> I G m C C ~ n A O~ v W w 9 b m W C~ u u n C C I d rl ~ a •+ ^I v n N£. u. • C. >. O d. 6 O I O .n .•• g I O q M C N S S v v U .] ~n ~ q A •O A ~n I A O ~ ~ O v vl 'O U. O r . rr U.]O. 4£ I UK£.] I >m V r+Owdmmw£E. I mV14 .]w ~ U>UO> OOt $. 2w Z r z m mO a G U . a O 4 C 0 O O N N O m r w M f^ P291 ~N ,N ID F ~ L - ~ U m ~ d CO I M y N I a ... m a o ~vcx I N O I ~U~! A X C G ~..~u£ I£wa d % Il oa w U I\ IN V I {` i d I M i O I O I u ~a r m D m o m n o m o o n o 0 D o In rv m o m n a I N n m O m O m O~ O O A m O O O O I O p •1 ~ O m b r r m • N p U. O ~ 'O a rl .1 •~ r'I O n iY .4 O O O H r1 N .Z, • q • '•1 1 I a'O O ~ N p O u > > 'N • 1q Un . O F I d U N N I 1U Opp O NYI D N OO Y1 1•I O n O m m O O m I OOOO I O O O O ~ ry p Or m• N p m r O U N• a 1-I • y u 0 m. m • m m q m . n • n m 0 n r'1 n D n rl n wl N 1.1 I O o O N n N d M O ['J 3 ~6 O 000 NpOV00p o Op0 .. Onn p. 2 ..+ r o r m r r o p y O^ q p O F p p r1 r. O r'1 rl n O n O. O O p n p .] d• ~ J >• m ~~ L' I r V O m O N n O 1.1 O p n O O O O 1 m m r m O m p Y Z y• .~ d {K I N N n O 1.1 O N p p O O p I O O O O I O p 'I O O O N• • K> .'C ri M .1 n n m ~ p U C "~ \ 4' I •O d n O •1 '1 'I n M .i O O O ri ^I '1 • 4a y • U 'J ~ y 'C O 1 .. p 0 [L R. m u H N • m a. 40 I Un mOmON1001p00 1p I p0 p O I • Pm •'IO fI mM K O N• • \'-' V• F I a U N N ~ 0 m O m O m YI N O VI I O O O O I ~ O U N• m ~ d 4. u u c N N M n w p p O a ~ >~ '! N O F1 .1 •1 O 'I 'I •4 '1 'I '1 N 1.1 ~ D . O O N 'I N y a : L I • E• I a O n a . (G m O n 0 N p O p O O p ~ O m O 0 N O N• ~ ~ d• '0 0 7. •> U N. 0 D m n n Don 0 ~ 0 a q ~. C• a • O q .3 ~ r to m A• m O n n D O n D D o n n C y>. V d 0• d N U m L• U y d• •1 q "1 N O p O Y1 N O N O O Y1 O O O O N n n O n O a O m• . y L d• a I t~1 '1 r1 O Yi .~l O O O O n O ~ U mi O. • a av• d > r'o I v m •m ~ n om• uu aa~ ~ ,",ro O I " ^o .. .. n., .. D DDN•4N w~ u U O y 7 V• O 'p • '[1 • • m N i •'I O m r O r 0 0~ o O O 0 o n N O m O P N• U w m > w . F 1~ qnN .. o .~ 0 0 o'O o n F U m fir. ~ ~ n ~ n x y. m• d • y a M i N rl r'1 „1 O n n N I'1 O O O ry nl ry 0 a• £• m o I w • q o ti D n o In o 0 0 0 o D i o p o o i m n rv D rv r. v. m „ a n O • N ~ r O r O m m m O O m O P O O I n~ 0~ U ~ ~ d m m. .l i .y n ~ n m ~ v to A C• G • p ..o .i .. ow D Dorvnrv E • S o. y. - - _ _ ~. o o. o. e - - - - c. q O. n ~ ~ o vl vlDpln a o v D e o00o ~ m rmpm n " . m. n.~l t. >• a o m i N o om o o oo D N • o • u v o u w• \. o o m m . m . m r. a v. v c v v .+ ..o n n n n n oo rvnrv o rv a 6. 9• D o m D u D w I O a a O• 4• m y n N n O n O N rl O n O D n U O O O O I 'J 'I . N m p O p m ~rl F I M m T O T T O O U o ~ ~ U• m >• • L' N N ' N o 0 m D m ~D w m '0 • O• 4 i 1 6 N D O r. rl ~ N o N .1 N I£ O. O p N r• rv u• O w {J • O N r O r O V O V O ~p I £ O p O O m 'I n r M• H • N• •~rll rvlOrO OO.1 n n 3m ~r N ObU n 6• ry• yG • U 'I •-I O •i .4 0 •-I O n >. O O O N n N a w r ad• -a C • .. N .-I • .. .. W q .. .. .. 4• : m o • . - v . .. ~ U T. C ~9 .. y .. .. .. ~nm d 0 ~ .. .. G C u ~i4 .. v .. .. v .. m.+0.OL >d~ a 0• r U U U r •• •• V O ~ ~• 9 m ~~ E O> i O ~~ C r ~ d U N L G V O G• V• „ u. mE •<yi d £ 4 ..>> ••••o av a T ..>>.Ud >£u• ~. > L m i n m \ \ • N• F A• m d 1 O m U' I U > L a 4 O O u d 9 '0 ~ ~ n V V i m£ U O T q • u. d E• O E D L y m l E u~. G> V u 44n I v,] m mn O m C E A aLY• - ~~ o g v r d> i G OI C C I ti m 0~ a w W 9~ a W C~ V a n C C ~ d \-I ~ N .O+ m m ~ m£• u ~ F j G A H G d C 6£ W m N V W~ U 4 V > 0 7 G a 2 > ; I 1 I ~ ~ U a 0• 4 i I U a£ . g ~ U C 1 .1 . U t) • 03/12/2007 10:18 Filelume: EPAM .OUT Page 1 _____________P ________________.-_-__.________~__________ ________ Pro osed Fot hill/Grove Mixed Use Pro ~ect TIA (JN-10105035) Existing Plvs Project Condi[i0ne AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM operations Method (FUty re Volume Alternative) •.•.•.••••......+:.+•:•u•••+•••.+~+++•••••+++••++••u.•~u uu+.++•••••++••••u Intersection Al Grove Ave/Foothill Hlvd Cycle (sect: 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.424 Loss Time Ise C): 30 (Y+A.4.0 ee c) Average Delay (sec/veh): 21.8 Optimal Cycle: 79 Level Of Service: C ~.••++......«•...•.••..•u.u........•.•u«u•u•u•u •.•.•u.+...+••+•+•••••• Approach: No[th Bound South Bound East Bound Neet Bound Movement: L - T - R L - i - R L - T - R L - T - R ___________I ___II_______________II_-___-__-_____II____________.I Cont ral: Permitted Permitted Protected Piote cted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 32 32 32 32 32 32 10 29 2] 10 2] 27 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 _I ._II_______________II____________.__II__-___________ I Volume Module: Base Vol: 1"19 68 79 78 96 26 20 586 125 126 861 46 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 179 68 79 ]B 96 25 20 586 125 126 861 46 Added Vol: 0 5 0 17 9 17 10 0 0 0 0 10 Pa sserByVOl: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fu[: 179 73 79 96 105 42 30 586 125 I26 061 56 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 I.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 180 ]] 83 100 111 44 32 61l 132 133 906 59 ReducL Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 180 77 R3 100 111 44 32 617 132 133 906 59 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 188 ]7 83 100 111 94 32 617 132. 133 906 59 ____________I_________.___II_______________II______________II______________I Saturation Plow Module: Saf/Lane: 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1000 1800 1800 1800 Adjuatme nt: 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 I.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1700 1000 1800 1700 3600 1800 1700 3600 1800 1]00 3600 1800 ----------I------- ------II---------------II---------------II--------------I Capacity Malyaie Module: Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.09 0.05 0.06 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.17 0.07 0.08 0.25 0.03 Ctit Moves: •••• •••• •+• Green/Cycle: 0.32 0.31 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.10 0.92 0.42 0.16 0.48 0.98 Volume/Cap: 0.35 0.13 0.14 O.1B 0.10 0.08 0.19 0.40 0.17 0.50 0.92 0.07 Delay/Veh: 26.4 29.3 24.4 29.] 23.9 23.8 91.8 20.2 18.1 '90.0 18.9 19.0 User Del Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 26.4 29.3 24.9 29.] 23.9 23.8 91.8 20.2 18.1 40.0 18.4 14.0 LOS by Move: ~ C C C C C C D C B D H B HCM2kB6thO: ] 3 3 4 2 1 2 10 4 ] 15 - 2 Note: Queue reported ie the number of care per lane T[affix 7.8.0715 (C1 2006 Dowling Asa OC. Licensed to RBF CONSULTING, IRVINE 03/12/200] 10:18 Filename: EpAM .OUT Pane 2 N W 07/12/2007 10:19 Filename: EPPM.DDT p 1 Proposed Fo[hill/Grove Mixed Uee Project TIA (UN-10105039) Existing Plus Project Condi[iona PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method IFUGUre Volume Alternative) Inte ree cLion ql Grove Ave/Foothill Hlvd Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. l%): 0.598 Lose Time (aec): 10 (Y.R~9 .0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 29.5 Optimal Cycle: 79 Level OE Service: C Approach: North Hound South Hound East Bound Neat Bound Move men[: L - T - R L - T ,- R L - T - R L - T - R ____-_______I__ _ ________II_______________II____________-__II_____ ________I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: J2 32 32 32 32 32 30 2] 27 10 27 2] Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 _______--___I_____ ________~I______________II_______________II-______________I Volume Module: 0ase Vol: 177 193 197 171 111 19 32 1280 136 ]0 936 HB Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 ].00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 17] 193 147 171 111 19 32 12 HH 136 70 936 HH Added Vol: 0 9 0 15 8 15 39 0 0 0 0 1H Passe reyvol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 177 202 147 106 119 29 50 1280 136 70 936 106 user Aaj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ].00 1.00 I.nn 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 186 213 155 196 125 31 53 1356 193 ]9 985 112 AeducL Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 106 213 155 196 125 31 53 1356 193 74 985 112 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 186 213 155 196 125 31 53 1356 143 79 985 112 I--------------II---------------II---------------II --I Satura Lion Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1800 1800 1800 1000 1800 1800 1800 1000 1800 1800 1000 1800 Adj us[ment: 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 I.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 170D 1800 1800 1700 3600 1000 1]00 3600 1000 1]00 3600 1000 ____________I___________I I_______________I I__-__________I I______________I Capacity Analysis Modulei Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.12 0.09 0.12 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.30 O.OH 0.04 0.27 0.06 Crit Moves: •^• ••• .••. Green/Cycle: 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.16 0.90 0.48 0.10 0.92 0-42 Volume/Cap: 0.39 0.37 0.27 0.36 0.11 0.05 0.20 0.78 0. 1] 0.93 0.64 0.15 Delay/Veh: 26.3 26.6 25.9 26.5 24.0 23.6 37.2 24.1 14.0 99.1 23.7 17.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 26.3 26.6 25.5 26.5 29.0 23.6 37.2 24.1 19.0 49.1 23.7 17.7 LOS by Move: C C C C C C D C B D C B HCM2 kH5thO: ] D 6 H 2 1 3 2H 9 4 19 3 ......uu.u•..•••••••.....•«.••••uuu•.•.. u..••••••:.. u.•«.. •.••••..•••• Note: Queue aported is the number of care Per lane. Traffix ].0.0715 Icl 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed Co RHF CONSULTING, IRVINE 03/12/200]. 10:19 Filename: EPPM.OUT pace 2 N A P296 CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 10601 Church Sireet, Suite 112, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)989-8541 Fex: (909)941.1732 BOARD OF TRUSTEES _ , Steven L. Godwin November 29, 2006 Hugh M, Jackson Barbara M. Rich ~fCathy A. Thompson Paul Marlin Joan R. Weiss RBF CONSULTING 14725 Alton Parkway Irvine, CA 92618 ADMfNISTRATORS Sharon L. Nagel Dear Paul: Superintendent I am writing f0 document the Central School District (CSD) forecast RobeR A. Dalton, Ed.D. Assisrarn superintendent, number of elementary aged children generated by the proposed Business Services Foothill/Grove Mixed-Use project located at the northeast comer of the Curtis R. Frick Foothill Boulevazd/Grove Avenue intersection in the City of Rancho Assistant Superintendent, ClleamOngfl. Human Resources and Safety Preparedness Based on our review of the project description and anticipated pricing of Donna L. Llbuttl Aseistent superimendent, the proposed residential units, we anticipate approximately 17 total Student Achievement and children (grades K through 8) to be generated by the proposed project. Educational Services While this projection is low by histotical standards, the recent experience of the district has been that few elementary aged children aze generated by new housing in the $500,000 plus price range. Please contact me with any questions. Sincerel C-i.. d"(~ / Robert A. Dalton, Ed.D. Assistant Superintendent, Business Services ] I i I RAD:dr Enrollment Projections Page 1 of 2 P297 ent Projections Street. suite 112 ~$aneho Cueomorsga, CA 9173D Fiscal Services AAopted Budget Budget Calendar Enrollment Projections ~ P2 ADA Since 1952-53 Actual Enrollment Health Benefits Payroll EXHIBIT X Central School District' current enrollment is found on the page entitled, ~ttnal-F~wllui nrollment projections for future years will be updated and placed on this web page at the beginning of the budget development process in January. 0 07-OB Growth Proje ctions ~ ~ Current Enrollment Pro ected Enrollment Site A ri1200 2007-OS ~ ~ ~ ~ Central ~ 568 ~ 541 Valle Vista ~ 525 ~ 515 CMS ~ 912 ~ 904 Dona Merced ~ 559 ~ 531 Bear Gulch Coyote Canyon ~ ~ 564 752 ~ ~ 560 -- 689 Ruth Musser ~ ~ 1047 ~ 1001 Home & Hospital ~ ~ ~ ~ Total ~ 4932 ~ 4745 ~ ~ ~ ~ Curr En Ilment n ollment Projec nr Grade ~ ^ ~ A f~ o ~ ^ ~ ~ 2007 ~ Kindergarten ~ 439 ~ 431 First ~ 500. ~ 432 Second - ~ 509 ~ 495 Third ~ 563 ~ 511 Fourth ~ 515 ~ 567 FiRh ~ 555 ~ 524 Sixth ~ 519 ~ 559 il_services/Enro I l ment_Projections/enro I Iment~2roj ections. h... 8/2 8/2007 + From: io:94772847 O6/27/Z007 13:41 11592 P. 001/002 P298 June 26, 2007 Mr. James R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Troyer: Public Works Department Development Services 460 North Euclid Avenue Upland, CA 91786 Telephone (909) 931-4145 Facsimile (909) 931-4321 CIN OF RANCHO CUCA~ONGA JUN 2 7 2007 RECEIVED -PLANNING SUBJECT: ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 MDCED-USE PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Dear Mr. Troyer: Upland staff has reviewed the subject report and have the following continuing concerns: 1. The traffic study does not indicate that the project would have a reduced traffic impact if a second controlled access was provided to Red Hill Country Club Drive. 2. The traffic impacts and off-street parking issues resulting from the proposed project need to be addressed as they relate to the Grove Avenue residential area in Upland. The overall issues are very simliar to those being addressed for the areas accessed by Red HIII Country Club Drive. Three changes are requested to your Planning Commission Resolution No.07-38 as follows: 1. Planning Department: Condition No.7 should be modified to require the installation of a protected left-turn signal for southbound Grove Avenue on to Foothill Boulevard without reference to warrant studies, lute 6fi Mixed-Use TIA 6.25.07.doc EXHIBIT Y 'From: To:94772847 06/27!2007 13:42 11592 P. 002/002 P299 2. Engineering Department: Condition No.2 should be modified to require the developer to secure a quitclaim of the easement for street purposes from the City of Upland and conveyance directly to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. We are concerned that the easement for the street remains in public control as there are street improvements already in place. 3. Engineering Department: Condition 3a should be added to continue prohibiting parking on the east side of Grove Avenue adjacent to the project. If you.have any questions, please call me at (909) 931-4131.. Sincerely, Jeffrey A Bloom Community Development Director PO Box 460 Upland, CA 91785-0460 Telephone: (909) 931-4131 Fax: (909) 931-4321 Email: ibloomCrD.ci.uoland.ca.us Cc; Anthony La, Public Works Director Paul Martin, RBF Consulting File Neme: R:1DeeNrtors at Route 66 M6md-Use TIA 8.25.07.doc nr~rv n~ n n *Trun rr Tr n r,rnr.Tr_ n MEMORANDUM DATE: June 27, 2007 TO: James Troyer, Planning Director FROM: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Planning Commission Agenda Items C, D, E, F, & G City of Upland Concerns City of Upland has three requested changes to the conditions of approval. Their request and response are as follows: 1. Planning Department: Condition No. 7 should be modified to require the installation of a protected left-turn signal for southbound Grove Avenue on to Foothill Blvd without reference to warrant studies. Response: Modify Resolution No. 07-38 and Resolution No. 07-39 Planning Department Condition No. 7 on pages C, D, E, F, G 383 and 427 respectively as follows: The applicant shall submit a request to Caltrans for the installation of a protected lefr-tum signal for southbound Grove Avenue on to Foothill Boulevard and provide any warrant studies required by Caltrans. If approved by Caltrans applicant shall provide for all improvements necessary for the protected left-turn signal. 2. Engineering Department: Condition No. 2 should be modified to require the developer to secure a quitclaim of the easement for street purposes from the City of Upland and conveyance directly to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Response: This is the intent of Condition No. 2 and no modification is necessary. Also since the existing easement is in favor of the City of Upland they will have control of the quitclaim process. 3. Engineering Department: Condition 3a should be added to continue prohibiting parking on the east side of Grove Avenue adjacent to the project. P300 Response: Engineering Department Condition 8g requires applicant to.provide or protect R26(s) "No Stopping" signs. Therefore Uplands concerns are already addressed and no modification is necessary. P301 RED HILL TRAFFIC SURVEY RESULTS QUESTION YES NO 1. Permanently close Red Hill Country Club Drive between Calle Carabe and Foothill Blvd. 57 288 2. Construct a raised median island on Base Line Road and Foothill Blvd. 52 293 3. Install intersection divider at Alta Cuesta and Red Hill Count Club Drive 32 313 4. Private streets with gates entrances 169 176 5. Install cul-de-sacs at various locations 56 289 6. Install speed humps 217 128 7. More enforcement of traffic regulations 221 124 8. Change nothing 72 273 TOTAL NUMBER OF SURVEYS RECEIVED: 345 (As of 8/14/07) EXHIBIT Z P302 _. 71 ~~3FT /~tU/''I/il/~3i~Y P303 41 Corporate Park,Suite 300 1rvlne,CA 92606 .949.660.7994 ma1n - 949.660.1917 fax September 10, 2007 Mr. Jason Kamm ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC 16661 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 712 Encino, CA 91436 www.urbanxroads.com Subject: Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard Residential/Commercial Development Supplemental Air Quality Evaluation PURPOSE Urban Crossroads, Inc. prepared a technical Air Quality Impact Analysis report for the proposed Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard Residential/Commercial project ("Project") dated May 15, 2006. Since the preparation of that study, new regulatory requirements and refined modeling applications have become available. The primary changes include: South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) creating methodology and significance thresholds for evaluating PMz.6 emissions, California Air Resources Board (GARB) releasing the latest Emfac2007 emissions inventory model, and Rimpo and Associates releasing the latest URBEMIS2007 model. Thus, the purpose of this evaluation is to determine if there are any changes in the impacts determined in the May 15, 2006 report as they relate to the new regulatory requirements and the refined modeling applications. NEW REGULATORY REQUIREMENT AND REFINED MODELING APPLICATION California and the federal governments have established ambient air quality standards for fine particulate matter (PM) less than or equal to 2.5 microns in diameter (PM 2.5). As a result, there was a need to establish a methodology for calculating PM 2.5 and appropriate EXHIBIT AA P304 Mr. Jason Kamm ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 10, 2007 Page 2 PM 2.5 significance thresholds for the purpose of analyzing local and regional PM 2.5 air quality impacts in CEQA or NEPA air quality analyses. On October 6, 2006, the SCAQMD Governing Board unanimously adopted the methodology to calculate PM2.5 and PM2.5 significance thresholds as summarized in the SCAQMD document: Final-Methodology to Calculate Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5 and PM 2.5 Significance Thresholds. Rimpo and Associates in association with various air districts (including SCAQMD) throughout California have developed the URBan EMISsions (URBEMIS) 2007 (version 9.2), land use and air pollution emissions computer model that is used to calculate the daily emissions increase associated with a proposed project. The URBEMIS 2007 model calculates emissions of PM2.5 and also utilizes the latest emission factors derived by the state of California (Emfac 2007). The URBEMIS 2007 model, which supercedes the URBEMIS 2002 v. 8.70 (which was utilized in the previously prepared analysis), was utilized to forecast emissions levels for project construction and operational activity for this evaluation. Output from the model runs for both construction and operational scenarios are provided in Attachment "A" and "B", respectively. Emfac2007 version 2.30 is the latest emission inventory model that calculates emission inventories for motor vehicles operating on roads in California. This model reflects the ARB's current understanding of how vehicles travel and how much they pollute. The Emfac2007 model can be used to show how California motor vehicle emissions have changed over time and are projected to change in the future. This information helps ARB weigh prospective control programs and determine the most effective, science-based proposals for protecting the environment. The Emfac2007 model supercedes Emfac2002 (which was utilized in the previously prepared analysis), Emfac2002 was released in November 2002. The Emfac2007 model, like previous versions Emfac2000 and Emfac 2002, is an integrated model in that it P305 Mr. Jason Kamm ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 10, 2007 Page 3 combines emission rate data with vehicle activity to calculate an emission inventory. The Emfac2007 model was utilized for purposes of this evaluation REVISED CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS The construction-related assumptions set forth in the May 15, 2006 air report were utilized as inputs into the new URBEMIS 2007 model. The results of the refined modeling are summarized in Table 1 (without mitigation) and Table 5 (with mitigation) for regional daily construction emissions and Table 3 (without mitigation) and Table 6 (with mitigation) for localized daily construction emissions. The results indicate that the project is not expected to exceed the SCAQMD regional or localized emissions thresholds for VOCs, NOx, CO, SOx, PM10, and PM2.5 after the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures identified in the previous report. REVISED OPERATIONAL IMPACTS The trip characteristics and land use assumptions set forth in the May 15, 2006 air report were utilized as inputs into the new URBEMIS 2007 model. The results of the refined modeling are summarized in Table 2 for operational activity. The results are consistent with the previously prepared study and indicate that the project is not expected to exceed the SCAQMD regional or localized emissions thresholds for VOCs, NOx, CO, SOx, PM10, and PM2.5. Table 2 (without mitigation) summarizes the regional daily operational emissions and Table 4 (without mitigation) summarizes the localized daily operational emissions. Since the project is not expected to exceed any of the regional or localized emissions thresholds, no mitigation is required. CONCLUSION The results of the Foothill/Grove Mixed-Use Air Quality Impact Analysis, as summarized in the May 15, 2006 report are still valid. The proposed project also complies with the new PM2.5 emissions thresholds established by the SCAQMD. P306 Mr. Jason Kamm ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 10, 2007 Page 4 If you have any questions, please contact me directly at (949) 660-1994 x 217. Respectfully submitted, URBAN CROSSROADS, INC. Haseeb Qureshi Senior Air Quality Specialist HQ JN:03731-04_Letter Report P307 TABLE 1 EMISSIONS SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (POUNDS PER DAY) (WITHOUT MITIGATION) Demolition/Grading VOC NOx CO SO, PM10 PMz.s Demolition E ui menl 3.45 26.51 14.96 0 1.57 1.44 Demolition Haul Trucks 0.56 7.08 2.17 0 0.35 0.31 Demolition Worker Tri s 0.04 0.08 1.29 0 0.01 0.00 Gradin Fu hive Dust 0 0 0 0 50.00 10.44 Gradin Equi ment 7.91 64.92 37.08 0 3.42 3.15 Gradin Water Truck 0.22 2.83 0.87 0.00 0.14 0.12 Gradin Worker Tri s 0.07 0.12 1.94 0 0.01 0.00 Peak Da Mass Emissions 12.25 101.54 58.31 0.01 55.50 15.46 SCAOMD Re Tonal Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Si nificantl NO YES NO NO NO NO Paving VOC NO, CO SOx PM,e PMz.s Off-Gas Emissions 0.27 0 0 0 0 0 Pavin Off Road Diesel Emissions 2.89 19.10 9.17 0 1.38 1.27 Pavin On Road Diesel Emissions 0.16 2.17 0.86 0 0.11 0.09 Pavin Worker Trips 0.03 0.06 0.97 0 0.01 0.00 Peak Da Mass Emissions 3.35 21.33 11.00 0 1.50 1.36 SCAOMD Re Tonal Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant? NO NO NO NO NO NO Building Construction VOC NOx CO SOx PM,e PM2.s Buildin Equipment 5.53 33.91 17.52 0 2.64 2.43 Buildin Vendor Trips 0.39 4.40 3.30 0.01 0.22 0.19 Buildin Worker Tri 0.42 0.71 11.65 0.01 0.09 0.05 Architectural Coatin Emissions 169.05 15.78 21.38 0.02 0.60 0.50 Peak Da Mass Emissions 175.39 54.60 53.85 0.04 3.55 3.17 SCAOMD Re Tonal Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Si nificant7 YES NO NO NO NO NO Source: URBEMIS 2007 v 9.2 Outputs U:1U cJobs\_03600-04000\_03700\03731 \Excel\[03731-02.XL S]71 P308 TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF PEAK OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS (SUMMER) (POUNDS PER DAY) (WITHOUT MITIGATION) Operational Activities VOC NO, CO SOx PMte PMz.e Area Source 6.05 1.57 5.11 0.00 0.01 0.01 Operational 11.65 12.17 142.55 0 16.70 3.26 0 erational Emissions 17.70 13.74 147.66 0.10 16.71 3.27 SCAOMD Re Tonal Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Si nificant? NO NO NO NO NO NO SUMMARY OF PEAK OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS (WINTER) (POUNDS PER DAY) (WITHOUT MITIGATION) Operational Activities VOC NOx CO SOx PMte PMz.s Area Source 5.61 2.13 0.94 0.00 0.05 0.05 O erational 11.32 17.60 128.05 0 16.70 3.26 Operational Emissions 16.93 19.73 128.99 0.09 16.75 3.31 SCAOMD Re Tonal Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Si nificant7 NO NO NO NO NO NO Source: URBEMIS 2007 v 9.2 Outputs U:\U W obs\_03600-04000\_03700\03731\Excel\[03731-02.XLS]T2 P309 TABLE 3 LST ANALYSIS SUMMARY OF PEAK CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (WITHOUT MITIGATION) (POUNDS PER DAY) DemolitionlGrading NO, CO PM~a PMz.s Peak Da Mass Emissions 101.54 58.31 55.50 15.46 SCAOMD Localized Si nificance Threshold' 529 2,523 50 12 Significant? NO NO YES YES Paving Activity NOx CO PM~o PMx.s Peak Da Mass Emissions 21.33 11.00 1.50 1.36 SCAOMD Localized Si nifcance Threshold' 529 2,523 50 12 Si nificant7 NO NO NO NO Building Construction NOx CO PM~a PMz.s Peak Da Mass Emissions 54.80 53.85 3.55 3.17 SCAOMD Localized Si nifcance Threshold' 529 2,523 50 12 Si nificant? NO NO NO NO Source: URBEMIS 2007 v 9.2 Outputs 'SCAOMD Localized Significance Threshold for 5 acre project at 50 meters (SRA 32) U:\UcJobsl_03600-040001_03700103731\Excel\[03731-02.XLS)T3 P310 TABLE 4 LST ANALYSIS" SUMMARY OF PEAK OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS (SUMMER) (POUNDS PER DAY) (WITHOUT MITIGATION) Operational Activities NOx CO PMte PMz.s O erational Emissions 3.40 28.50 0.86 0.19 SCAQMD Localized Si nifcance Thresholds 529 2,523 12 3 Significant? NO NO NO NO SUMMARY OF PEAK OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS (WINTER) (POUNDS PER DAY) (WITHOUT MITIGATION) Operational Activities NO, CO PMta PM=.5 Operational Emissions 4.45 29.28 0.90 0.23 SCAQMD Localized Si nificance Threshold 529 2,523 12 3 Si nificant? NO NO NO NO 'Conservatively assumes all on-site trip length to be approximately 0.5 mile Source: URBEMIS 2007 v 9.2 Outputs 'SCAQMD Localized Significance Threshold for 5 acre project at 50 meters (SRA 32) U:\U cJobs\_03600-04000\_03700\03737 \Excel\[03731-02.XLS]T4 P311 TABLE 5 EMISSIONS SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (POUNDS PER DAY) (WITH MITIGATION) Demolition/Grading VOC NOx CO SO, PM10 PMz.s Demolition E ui ment 3.45 26.51 14.96 0 1.57 1.44 Demolition Haul Trucks 0.56 7.08 2.17 0 0.35 0.31 Demolition WorkerTri s 0.04 0.08 1.29 0 0.01 0.00 Gradin Fu hive Dust 0 0 0 0 21.29 4.45 Gradin Equipment 7.91 51.93 37.08 0 3.42 3.15 Gradin Water Truck 0.22 2.83 0.87 0.00 0.14 0.12 Gradin Worker Tri s 0.07 0.12 1.94 0 0.01 0.00 Peak Da Mass Emissions 12.25 86.55 58.31 0.01 26.79 9.47 SCAOMD Re Tonal Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Si nificant? NO NO NO NO NO NO Paving VOC NOx CO SOx PM1o PMz.s Off-Gas Emissions 0.27 0 0 0 0 0 Pavin Off Road Diesel Emissions 2.89 19.10 9.17 0 1.38 1.27 Pavin On Road Diesel Emissions 0.16 2.17 0.86 0 0.11 0.09 Pavin Worker Trips 0.03 0.06 0.97 0 0.01 0.00 Peak Da Mass Emissions 3.35 21.33 11.00 0 1.50 1.36 SCAOMD Re Tonal Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Si nificant? NO NO NO NO NO NO Building Construction VOC NOx CO SOx PM1e PMz.s Buildin E ui ment 5.53 27.12 17.52 0 2.64 2.43 Buildin Vendor Tri s 0.39 4.40 3.30 0.01 0.22 0.19 Buildin Worker Tri 0.42 0.71 11.65 0.01 0.09 0.05 Architectural Coatin Emissions 62.55 15.78 21.38 0.02 0.60 0.50 Peak Da Mass Emissions 68.89 48.01 53.85 0.04 3.55 3.17 SCAOMD Re Tonal Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Si nificant? NO NO NO NO NO NO Source: URBEMIS 2007 v 9.2 Outputs U:\UcJobs\_03fi00-04000\_03700103731 \Excell[03731-02.XLSITS P312 TABLE 6 LST ANALYSIS SUMMARY OF PEAK CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (POUNDS PER DAY) (WITH MITIGATION) Demolition/Grading NO, CO PMis PMz.s Peak Da Mass Emissions 88.55 58.31 26.79 9.47 SCAQMD Localized Si nificance Threshold\ 529 2,523 50 12 Si nificant? NO NO NO NO Paving Activity NOx CO PMfu PMz.s Peak Da Mass Emissions 21.33 11.00 1.50 1.36 SCAQMD Localized Si nificance Threshold\ 529 2,523 50 12 Si nificant? NO NO NO NO Building Construction NO, CO PMfa PMz.s Peak Da Mass Emissions 48.01 53.85 3.55 3.17 SCAQMD Localized Si nifcance Thresholds 529 2,523 50 12 Si nificant? NO NO NO NO Source: URBEMIS 2007 v 9.2 Outputs 'SCAQMD Localized Significance Threshold for 5 acre project at 50 meters (SRA 32) U:IUcJobs\_03600-04000\_03700\03731 \Excel\[03731-02.XL5]T6 Page:1 9/10200] 03:14:09 PM Urbemis 200J V¢rslon 9.2 O Combinetl Summer Emissions Reports (Pounds/Day) File Name: U:{UWobs\_03600-040001_03700\03731\Urbemis103731 Construction.urb9 Project Name: Grove Ava. and Foothill Blvtl Residential Conslmcli0n PmjeG location: SouN Coast AOMp On-Roatl VeNG¢ Emissions Basetl on: Version : Em1ac2007 V2.3 Nov 1 2006 Off-Road VehiGe Emissions Based on: OFFROAD2007 Summary Report I I I I ~ ~ J, jjl I I I I „ti II tl~ I'~ii CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES BQfy NHgi fi4 5~ 11QQy~ PM10 Erhausl eM-10 PM3_S DUSt PM2 SEelraust Qe~,~ 200]TOTAIS OR4tlay umNagalad) 116T 916] i5.2T 002 50.01 500 5501 10.d5 n80 15.D0 20D)TOTRLS (10.40ay mlpatW) 11A] )B.fil Ss 2) 002 x1.30 5.00 x8.]0 645 060 B.OS 2008 TOThLB (19alday unmi0pated) 500 39.01 3240 002 008 2B> 2.BS 003 2fi3 286 2908 TOTPL9Il6slday ml00ate0l 500 32.23 ]200 0.02 000 2.8) 2.B5 003 283 200 Conaleuctln~ VPMtl0ale0 OedO Rapo¢ CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTV.wTES Summer PounOS Per nay, Unmle0ale0 QO Ni4] S44 5_Q2 Phll4.PuS1 PM1p ENaus1 Time Sllce 8I1200LeN S200)NUmOOMCdvo Days'. tt tf.4T SS.]) $p~pt 5.00 91.5] ODO DemOBIbn 08/01200]-00/1520W 3n9 18.25 001 1ST x6.59 0.00 Fu0ltlve DUST O.OD 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 000 Demo of ROaa DMam 3.ds zest 1a.9a Ooo 0.a0 tsT Demo on aoae Diesel o ao a Da o.oo o.oo D.oo D o0 Demo woderTapa Oo4 oDe vz9 aoo a.m Ooo Maas GmOn0 Da91rzoo)-0aral2oo) zm 3B.oz m.o1 3.dx fi50d 000 Mass Gm4hg DUST 0.00 000 000 000 50.00 0.00 Mara GmOilp Olf Road DiwN ].BI W.B2 3)OB 0.00 0.00 3.d2 Mass Gndllp On Road Basel 0.00 0 dD 0.00 0.00 0.00 D.00 Mau Gr 01n0 WOMer Tdps 00] 0.13 tB4 000 0.01 0.00 Time 3Ke 0I16200)AI]t200)NUmOG FpNe Days: v ).9T 39.02 5001 302 us od o.oo Maas GaElrq oaml2DW-0e(3120D] ],W 39.02 50.01 3Ax PM10 PM2~91 PM2.5 Fahavsl PM25 1DJq__S 1_04 55_01 1_50 000 1 <a 1.59 105 o.o0 000 000 0.00 Tn am 1 <a vas 00o D.oo o.oo o.Do Oo1 D.oo a.ao oao /OAS 3.15 5].43 13.60 so.oo to s4 0.00 1o.a ].62 0.00 3.15 3.15 0.00 000 000 0.00 0.01 000 o.DD Dot 1045 13.80 53.43 at5 10.45 3.15 W Pag6:1 9110200] 03:14:09 PM fi509 Mass GrzOBg Ou9 Oo0 000 Ma%%c,ae~p on Rwd Die:a T.s1 fia.az Mas%cradaq on Road we%el o00 0.00 Mass Gmmiq wpMer ]np% oaT 0.1z Tme Slka 9I3IZOOtA2B200t Number A[liva Bays: 3.38 pn 29.33 Aspnau oem1rz00t.o9narz00t 3.36 2i 33 Pav9q OII~Gas 0.21 000 RaWtq oO Rwd mesa z.s9 19.10 PaWtp On Road Diesel 0.16 21T PavMp Worker Trips 003 000 Tlme sere 1011200)-12]31200>NOmper ACOVB O.J3 Ibw' M 41.55 Buedb910101200T-1 V1Y2000 6.33 41.55 BuIIOBp OH Road Uesel 5.53 36.12 Buildhp Vendor Trips 039 46T 8plbinp Woker Ttlps 042 O.TT Time SllCa l/12009-111142006 NUmberACWe Bay1: 1fG `l.~6 3g Ol BuIWIn01NOt200]-tt/152000 S.ea 39.01 BuMlnp Oil Road Diesel 5.1] ]3.90 BuOtlup Ventlw Tees p.3) 440 Bu9ti~q Worker Trips 0.36 0.11 Terse: Demp9lbn fi11200T - 0/ti200) - Detautt Demdlllpn %u%e ACnr Dascrlplbe mo4Uns Bu1101tp VoNme Total (ryGC feel): 0 BuOtllnp Volume Daly (ablc lee0' 0 On Roatl Tiutlc Travel (VMT} 0 Oft-Rw0 EpulpmenC 1 Gpp[Rta9pdusbldl Saws (10 bpl opa2Bnp at a O.T31oatl lactor for 0 boon per day t Rubber Thad Dorers (35i Op) operl0np al a O.S91pad lanor for 6 bars per tlay 2 TmdOrslLOadprs/BaGboes (106 bp(operaWO al a 0.55 bad (aclOr fa B ttpurs per day 0 W 51.43 13E0 0.60 0.6o fin.6o 00o w.oo 10.44 000 loan n.oa o.oo fi.oo 3p2 3.az oao 315 vs 000 oao a.0o 000 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 +.94 000 001 0.00 o.m fi.oo 0.00 0.01 1099 O.Ot tA0 0.00 1.38 0.00 1.49 1.38 1n.99 061 tae o.00 1.78 0 W 1.49 1.30 o.oo 0.06 0.00 00o fioo 000 0.0o fioo e v 000 000 tae 13e 00o to tzt 0 06 000 0.01 0.10 0.11 0.00 0.09 009 09t 000 000 0.0p 001 O.W 0.00 DCO 11.95 0 p0 306 0.03 2.85 115 2.82 3395 0.00 306 0.03 2B2 a6z 11s ze5 1801 000 000 2.82 2.82 0.00 3.80 260 35a 0.01 0.02 031 0.23 Oo1 0.19 010 1240 001 0.08 0.0] 0.09 002 003 0.05 348 0.4fl E.9Z 0.03 L o.oz 2.34 2.fr3 3248 0.09 20t 0.03 2.83 003 2.95 2.88 1]sz o.a0 0.0o zb+ 264 0.0o z.43 293 1311 0.01 002 0.19 022 001 0.1e 0.19 11.65 0.01 000 003 009 0.02 0.03 005 W 1 M t0'0 00'0 000 loo 6DO t0'0 coo Ofi'l il'0 Loo sOPl+avoM BulpvO SSery 00"0 000 000 000 00'0 000 00'0 00'0 00'0 00'0 lasap peon uO BVIOUO SSery BlE SlC 000 ZOC ZYE 000 00'0 BOLE L6"lS lb'1 Asap p¢otl BO BUDuO SZeW sss aoo sss fii'IZ oo'0 6i'IZ aBO ao'o oo"o aoo lsnO BVrou0 s9¢W 09'< znz oD'o so zs SlE SV9 Z9E 6Z'lZ ZO'6E LBL LOOLlE9RL00U40/BO BVye+g sseW 000 000 OD'0 100 00'0 40'0 00'0 BZ'l BO'0 MSO Stly110ygM Owap 000 000 00'0 00'0 00'0 00'0 000 00'0 00'0 00'0 psa!O Deon uO PORO H't 11't 000 LSI 1Sl 00'0 00'0 B6'sl 1592 S>F psap peptl UO PwaO oD~o Doo ooP ro'D coo oo'o ooD DoD Do'o oD'a ~ Icro aMiBDd S!'l BS'I 00'0 6S'OZ 9>"l 00'0 LS't l00 SS9l 60S LOOZ5l90-LWLl0.90 vOp!pusp 09'9 OE9Z Op'0 b$`SI SG6 Sgt 00'9 bE'IZ 1~ Lo'll :sAeO aaDatl+amury.l LOOZ5lRL00LtIB W9S eupl S~ i~3ETW3 [i-~ dtY7d itF¢~ry3-bi WZ istOblWd ZdS. 8S *~IJ 319 paleBp!ry'AeO aad spunod+ewwn5531WILL53 NOISSIW3 NOILOOtl15N00 . 'YPtlatlXfl50W1e0pIW!bpirigzvoj- Aep Atl uMY B+Pl+ola¢I Peq SS D e le Bupe+aUa (dV BON faoyipaBryaP¢OYLPUP.Il C Aep stl vroY B+y +PPy peq 9"0 a IC Bupelado (tlY Efi) vlTWd uieua148ron L AW +aC LIIOV B+oI+PLay P¢ol £e 0 ¢ R BvpvaEO (OY 66f) S'auvJ l luawtllb3 p¢PN10 uo0tluasa0 uppawlcup~ Mgln6 tloya0 - BDDJJSIII t - LOOLINI uOpaMSpa~ &nq!nS:eseVd Aep AO vroV B+ol+opy PeoI9S 0 e le Bull¢+atlo ItlV S6) velptl t Aep+atl uwV B+ol+ppy Peol ZBO a 1¢ Bu9ua0o (BY OON vaned t Aep s0 vm4 B+ol +ovy peol l9 0 ¢ le BIgIVWO (tlV>Ltl vapuO l ~Yawtllw3 peaa-uo z"z:pvnee aY m caw pp6tlPaaaa BYp~ad npeJaa - Lnozroufi - eoomre EOlned :acepd Aep+etl W no4 O+ol+olay peol SS 0 a lv BuPUeEO (tlV BON vaaVYaeQryrepvoV VOpvl E Aep+etl LnoV B+OI +aVy peo105'0 a Ie Eun%`aAo (tlv LSCI vaxnO pa+LL+aWtltl f aYawtll~ p¢an~Jw O S1ryN Pvul+pul DWtl u0 Aepanp+atl vN Ol pnyao:Byaa Jp Ipna~ Isrp awleptl S OaY+tllslp aBeany N!ed wnwlvery Ol :perynlsp sentl Ivlol uppOUanO UO!IwW+jRuPUO aI!Svc¢W llnela0-LOOLILB-LOOUIR BUpvO SS¢W ev¢W Wd 60YF[O LOOLOI/6 E :efied Page:] 91ID200i O]:14:OS PM TYna 56re B/16ROOTb31rz00t NOm0at nctlve Dam: t9 Mass cnery 09,o1rzootadnlrzaaT Mass GmONp Dusl Md53 Gn'Jllp OIf RodO DIPStl Mass Gndltq On RDaJ DIH& Mass Gnauq Worker Trips Time sii~eer3rzooT-narzooT ROmeer ncwe Dam: m 7.9) J9.02 z1.z9 Jag 4A5 5205 0.00 26 T2 ].15 T.9t 3902 N.29 ]AZ 4a5 3.15 sz os 0.00 24.Tz 0.00 0.00 D 00 000 21.29 0.00 21.28 4.65 900 T.91 51.9] 3108 000 000 3 42 ] 42 0.00 3.15 Sao 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 Sao 0.90 9.oa 900 oot 0.1z 1s4 o.a0 o.m a.ao 901 ooa o.00 a]5 m.99 001 1A6 0.00 i 60 T.80 60.5 3.15 0m 001 1.30 W V Page:1 9H 02002 03:14:09 PM 21.]3 040 1.69 136 ASpban OON120D2-0BM200i ]36 10.88 001 tA8 0.00 tM 2133 Dm t4B FaNlq DUCaa o.zi ago o.oo b.oo 00o a.DD o00 o.ao o.oo Fawq Oll ROatl dexl _z.e9 19.10 9.n o00 o.oo lab tae o.ao 13i PBNn803RWO LYPSd 0.16 2.ti 096 0.00 0.01 0.10 0.11 v.00 o9s PavlnBWOMer Trips 003 000 0.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 001 D.00 000 Tune Slbe 10/1200]-12811200]Number Atlrve 633 3J.B5 0.06 3.06 00] ILw' f!. 34.3] 9,92 3.15 282 BuBONO 1W01200]-111152008 833 3J.95 008 306 0.0] 282 30.33 0.02 3.15 BwbNB al Rpa6 olazd 5s3 za.e9 1eo1 D.DO o00 2bz 2.BZ o.oD z.fio Bulkkp V6n0or TOps 039 4.62 151 001 0.02 0.21 023 0.01 0.19 BuIMIn9 WMkx inp.9 0.62 0.1] 12.40 001 008 0.03 0.09 0,02 003 Tma Sllca 1I1200841I142008 Number Active Oays: ~ $$$ P.40 2.$ 0.43 PJR 32.23 0.02 2.9i 2.43 Bu0tlbp tON1200i-tt1t52008 Seb 3348 0.06 2.02 OOJ 2.83 3233 0.02 2.85 BuBO0p O8 ROatl dead 5.1] 21.12 11.52 0.00 OOD T69 2.84 0.00 2.43 BuMirq VentlorTrys O3i a40 330 001 0.02 0.19 022 001 O.1B Bu3tlln9 Welker Tllpa 0.3b 021 t1.85 001 000 003 0.09 0.02 0.0] The bllowNB milgallpn meazum apply Ip Pnase: Mass Gotlirp BI1200i - flrJ1200) - Oehull Mass SIIe Go0N91Exwra0on Descnptlon Fa Soil Sbbltlnp Measures.llle Waler exposab curtaces ]x Oalry watarvl8 milga0on ro0uws amissionz by PMt0: b1Y. PM25: 61X Fa Unpave0 Roa03 Measums. Vle ReEUU apeeo on unW~e6 roa0a b less Nan IS mpb mltlPeGOn IeOUCes emtaians q'. PMIO: J4% PM35: 46% Fm Rubber Tketl Ooeeo, th pud DYba9bn Caolyst 20X mlBpation realms clvssions by. NOX 20X For TraclorsMa0erv8ackiwes. Ne Diesel Oxbatlon UNtysl20% mi89a4m retlucef emisslpns Ey: NO%20X Tne tolbMnB mllganpn measures apply to Pbase: Buatlln0 (`AnsNlCllpn t01120W - i 11152008 - Defaun BYIItlmB CpnaWCUOn OescOptlon For Cones, Ine dasal DYltlatlon Glarysl20X mllgatlon retluces amPSbns by: NOX 20X FMTagpVLpaEaNBacMaea, Ne desel Oxl0abon WIdIy5120%mllgalbn reglce5 emI531on5 by. NOX 20% For Rouyn TOrtaN FaklBte. Ne dead Osbatlon Catarys120%mi0paoan truces emksblu by: NOX 20% tab o aD Ln 9D9 O.DO 2.85 265 2.60 0.20 005 2.frfl 2 08 2.43 0.19 0.05 ~l-~ P319 EMISSIONS FROM ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS (UNMITIGATED) Construction Worker Trip Emissions Number of Workers 20 Average Tdp Length One-Way (miles) 30 Average Speed (MPH) 35 Daily VMT LDA 8 LDT 1200 LDA (pounds/mile)' LDT (poundslmile)' CO O.D1155158 0.02407553 NOx 0.00121328 0.02508445 ROGNOC O.D0118234 0.00323145 SOx 0.00001078 0.00002626 PM10 0.00008447 0.0009102 PM2.5 0.00005243 0.00078884 Emissions From Commuting (assumes 50 % LDA and 5D % LDT) VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 Estlmatetl Emissions (Ibs/day) from worker trips 2.65 15.78 21.38 0.02 0.60 0.50 80 gallons painVday 2.08 VOC Content (Ibs/gal) (assumes 2509/1 VOC paint) Emissions (Ibs/day) = VOC content of coating (Ibs/gal) X Amount of coaling applied (gaVday) 166.4 Ibs/day Total VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 169.05 15.78 21.36 0.02 0.60 0.50 'Emissions Factor Source: Highest (Most Conservative) EMFAC 2DW Emission Factors for On-Road Passaiger Venicles and Delivery Trucks, Anarysis Year 2007. (hdp:/hwnvagmtl.gov/cegalhaMbook/onroedlonroatl. htm0 P320 EMISSIONS FROM ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS (MITIGATED) Construction W orker Trip Emissions Number of Workers 20 Avemge Tdp Length One-Way (miles) 30 Average Speed (MPH) 35 Daily VMT LDA 8 LDT 1200 LDA (pounds/mile)' LDT (pounds/mile)' CO 0.01155158 0.02407553 NOZ 0.00121328 0.02506445 ROGNOC 0.00118234 0.00323145 SOx 0.00001078 0.00002626 PM10 0.00008447 0.0009102 PM2.5 0.00005243 0.00078884 Emissions From Commuting (assumes 50 % LDA antl 50 % LDT VOC NOx CO SOx PM70 PM2.5 Estimatetl Emissions (Ibs/day) from worker trips 2.65 15.78 21.38 0.02 0.60 0.50 80 gallons painUday 0.832 VOC Content (Ibs/gap (assumes 100g/l VOC paint) Emissions (Ibs/day) = VOC content of coating (Ibs/gap X Amount of coating applied (gaUday)' (10% reduction for HVLP application) 59.904 Ibs/day Total VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 62.55 15.78 T1.38 0.02 0.60 0.50 'Emissions Factor Source: Highest (Most Conservative) EMFAC 2007 Emission Factors for On-Road Passanger Vehicles and Delivery Trucks, Analysle Vear 2007. Ihttp://w.nv. agmtl.gov/caga/handbooklonroadlonroad. htmp P321 Water Truck Emissions VOC NOx CO fiOx PMIO PM2.5 Ih/mile lb/mile Ib/mile Ib/mile ro/mi]e Ib/mile Construction Worker Number of Trips and Trip Levgth Vebicle No. of One-Way One WayTrip Length Trips/Des (miles) Water Truck vF" Emission Factor (Ib/mile) x No. of Onc-Wey Tn-s/Day z 2 x Trip lengh(mile)=Mobile Emissions (Ib/day) VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 IEmusionf Ims and mclbetlolpgy obtained fiom SCAQgdD Dn Aead Em''ssiors Faclms(www.agmd.gm)-Niglvl(Mesl Cascrvalive)FAffAC1W]Emis'im Factors Ern nrvMaMHwy Heavy DUry Diesel Teu[ks. ANIYSis yea 3C0). U:\UCJObs\_03600-04000\_03700\03731\Excel\Construction Hantl Calcs-Rev Grading Water Truck P322 Mauling Truck Emisslonst Emission VOC NOx CO SOz PM10 PM3.5 Cmstructlon Worker Number of Trips antl Trip Lcngth Vehicle rvo. of Ono- Way One Weyl'rIp Lcngt0 TrIps/Oay (toles) Hauling Truck - Emission Fac[or Qb/mile) x No. of One-Wey Trips/Day x 2 x Trip length(mile)-Mobile Emissions (Ib/day) VOC NOx CO SOx PMlO PM2.5 tEmuvim 0cim>ntl mnMEalogy odvmEfmnSCAQ41D On Awtl &nesip¢Fenas (ww~v.pmlgw)-Higt t(Mmt CVUmaurcj FAffAC 20Q1 Fmisim FOUm ra OnAwA HCry Hnvy nary Dicsl Trvckc.Arelyrit scar 300"!. U:\UCJODS\_03600-OhOO0\ 03700W3737\ExcepCOnstruction Hand Calcs-Rev Hauling Truck Emissions P323 Page:1 6RBR00T 00:08:16 AM Uroemis 200'! Version 0.2.0 CamOineD Summer Emlasbns RepoRS (POUndslDay) Fde Name: Project Name: Grove Ava aM Fooltlm BIVO Resi0enlial Operations Project Location: South Coasl AOMD On-ROatl VeMCIe Emissions Basetl On: Version : Emfac200T V2.3 Nov 1 2000 Off-ROatl Vellkle Emissbns Basetl on: OFFROAD2007 Swrvnwy Rappm. AREA SOJRCE EMISSION ESTIMATES P9L fdfla 44 542 PM10 PAYL.6 TOTALS OOaION. PpmlBgale3) 6.05 1.A 5.11 O.W OOt 0.01 OPERATIONAL (VEHICIEi EMISSION ESTIMATES 94L N2s S4 543 PMIO P21Z3' TOTAL5110/Eay. unmltigalMi 11.G3 12.1] IQ.55 0,10 10.10 J3B SUM OF AREA SWRCE ANO OPEMTIONAL EM1551pN ESTIM1MTEa B44 N93 f4 543 PM10 PIR.S TOTAS neaMw. P^mlByle51 11.10 1J.)+ I+].09 0.10 16,11 J.21 A 9 V~ Unrnltlp (ep0 IeIRCyOrI _ AREA 9WRCE EMISSION ESTIMATES Summer Poums Per Deg UnMOgaleO S0v_rp@ R44 N2+ G4 542 aM1B PI.Q.S Nuax cn o.lx Ls om o.00 000 000 HeaN ~ No Summa Emissbns La~6awpu o+a 0,os +.+0 0.00 o0t 0,ot DpnSpmtt PrWUCW 5.05 Amnllepam COpSnpF 0.+z Area Sw¢e Cttvwm M Deleu LL Percent nxbantlal uslrq neWlel pas Uerye] Imn ]B%b I W% Pecenlapa al mlOenac vaN xwU slevea clwpM Imm I OX W 0% PeTClibpB OI mW¢rKK MN vmJ lRplBCm cliaipal Imm S%b 0% Pemm6pe al mlUencee MN naWM Bss rvegaces cAerpe! Irpm BS%b tOJX LenpM of summer perY.M Iw bMacepe epuipmenl cTarq W Imm 385 Eeya W 180 Oeya OparzlioneGUnrriilpaieL'-0e1aUReport ..- ,_ _ OPERATIONAL EMISSION ESTIMATES Summa PouMe Pa Dry. UrvnlSpaW a-gym. ROG NO% CA 502 PM10 PM25 SYgle /Ymlyfroualrq 266 2.81 3a.05 002 J.B5 0.]5 CoMNbxrv6ouap peneml 5.]t 5.81 68.00 0.05 ).8B 1.50 Garerel pBka WII64g 31B ].)s a150 a0] 5.1i 1.Ot TOr~LS 6'96¢7° rG06ga'~51 `t t95^?' H"I~tZ?ti'=~,~ r<25Yµ^5" 010" `-LJO'°y _; ..:~~28 P324 Page:1 BR9R00) oazeae AA6 opnaeprel5et5~gs: Don rollnawe aNrecupn rw pwspy mw Does MI lnawe pppme munurq mlps5nem mr insemN mp5 Anerysls Yeer 2000 TempenNm (F~'. BO 5eespn: Bummw Emlec'. Versbn : Em1ec20W V2A Nov 1200fi < ldq USe Tyye •mmarv o~y 1 en{~.y AGebp Tnp Rele UNITyye Na. Unlh TeW TSIw TprnlVMi SNye lemYy lsusY'q ].0] BS] EwMlry wlb 2].W Z20,11 232].]] fAnWlbrrtihauae peireral IBH 506 EwelArq wlb ]S.OD 1]B 50 ~UO.IB GerIeN OH¢e GUlbvq 20.8] ICW f911 II.W 3D]50 2.80>.91 BS].1B 8,651.02 VeMde Flnl Md VeIJae Type pncant Type NpnCeldysl Cs~nlyXl Oinel Lqm AUb 51.0 1.] BLB OA LqM Trv[k<]]Sp lot >A 1.1 Bt.e Lt Lqm Tluck NSDS]SO IM 22.8 O.B 90.1 0.0 MaE TmcM S]SfE5W 105 10.0 D.B 89.1 0.0 LlbHxvy Trvck 0501-IO,000Iw 1.6 D.0 013 15B LII>Hervy Tmck t0,ML11,0001M 05 0.0 00.0 <00 Me0-Heery TrvcF 11,001J].0001ee o.0 D,D Y11 ]Ta Hea+y-Heavy Trull ]]001-W.0001bi 05 0.0 00 100.0 olnerem o.l D.D o.o faD.D umep ew o.l D.o B.D 100.0 IbbrtTde z.e Ta.a mw o.o sdodeus D.1 D,D oD foD.D Mpbr Nome D.B 11.1 TL0 11.1 TrevN ConEi lone Rwgentldl Cpmmnael Home-WOM XBnq~$Mp NpmeONer Cpmmub NpnWpk CwbnKK UNm Tnp LetpN lmpwl II.] LO B.5 1]] )1 eY Rwei inp LVgNImOn) 1].0 12.1 HB ISA 96 128 TDp speNSlmpn) J0.0 ]0.0 f0.0 ]II.D ]0.0 ]11.0 X pI TnpS-RntlenllY ]2B 10.0 I0.1 X pl Trlps -Commeroal Iq kM met GrcwM pl0ce 9ulgiry ]5.0 1).5 O.5 P325 Page: 1 823 0120 01 0 0:30:52 AM Umams 200] VarsiWl0. 3.0 Com0ine0 Winter Emissio ns Report s (POUntlslDay) File Name: Prolect Name'. Grove Ave an0 Foom01 BNtl Resbentbl Operatbns Project Locatbn: Bautll Coas; AOMD Orl-ROatl Vellbla Emissbns Basetl OR Version : Emfac20W V3.3 Nov 1 2008 Off-ROatl Ve11'ble Emissions BazeO on: OFFROAD200] Summery Repoli •• AREA SOUflCE EMISSION ESTIMATES BXi O4J 44 542 PM O Pb+25 TOTALS ppslOey.umJtipaNE) 5.61 3.1] D& 0.% D.OS 0.05 OPERATIONAL (VEHICLE) EMISSION ESTIM4iE5 (3~4i DP8 ~ .~ PMIO fM3.8 TOTALS pEYUey. Ynm11ga1N) 11 J3 1].80 128.05 0.% 18.]0 ].38 sUM OF ARFA SOURCE AND OPERA-ONAL EMISSION ESTIMATES 349 tlSm 44 542 oMlo PMZ.s TOTALS pOLOay. urvnilgebt) 18% 19 ]J 128.pp 0% 16.]5 J.ll A $p RBAIRmIIYp W D IaIIAgEpI. II I-~ an. ,.w: AREA SOURCE EMISSION E3-MATES Wlnbr PcuMS Per Day, Unm0lBMetl SvuSa fl44 N9a SB 592 PMIO PM25 NeluralGa 0.12 1.53 0.08 O.W 0.00 O.CO Neab O.D1 0.81 0.28 0% 0.05 OW LaNicaphq - No Wnrir Emissblu COreVms PIMU[Y 5.% Amhl~ecwrel CotOnpa Oat ri TOFAL$ k1Yda'~L~~ IT9 Ie]Ilm~ y y_e~ ~ a'C~~s.21]. ~'jY'q^Y'$~r":~'~ S.O Oa A: '. ~vFn,[Yi' v rpy' pit a l1~r k- 4 %~la l' ~ u ii{iae x-Y~ al-.-T~ estis ~ ti ) ~c ~ ~..~~ .~ Area Sance CNamOC b Delmle Peacml lesbm141 ualeq neliwl gu Cagdl lmm 28%b I%% Pertenlape pl realCOrRW Hla wLN cbvn climpM hpm f0%Ip 0% PBRenbpe pl rOaIOMCas vile •wd8 f pIXAa cNe~ptl Imm 5%b OX Pe¢mbpe vl realCancoe MIB mWIaI80c OreplacM cOmpe] Imn BS%b 1 W% Lelglll pl [umma paME Ipr IaMCCape eQUlPmml c6ec9W Imm 3650aya b 160 Uay Opmbwl UniillTelaJ ~eVRPeWM1-••=. •_.... ...~.._ OPERATIONAL EMISSION ESTIMATES Wn¢r PouMi Pa Dry. Unmllgalel Sparta ROG NO% CO 503 PMtp PMLS Sllple ldmlly wvily 283 <.08 tB i1 0.03 ].85 0.]5 CoMmbenMUae poneml 5.25 a.ll 5B J2 O.pa 2.68 1.W GensA Dl5ce 8vlMlrq Oa5 5.% ]B% 0% 5.11 1.Ot TPTAL 10 darlwvnl8p ~)n - '®'~~I'1 J2' -,%BD f~ ~2~ -. ~~ 09 - x-+'95 0"' 9' ~ f5n r ? ` -.. ,.,1L 4§ ~` ~_ ->-L._' . n. .•~.aFu:.: ~.. ' n`: . # m,m.,e3 • .,,.~.. , : v H .~ _ .. .i~ . i C P326 Page:1 &39/200] 08:28:53 PIA Dpentlonel seNya: Wes nal InclWe mn¢cuon Ipr passpy Mpe Wo 1bl bclrbe awple min6lq e]lusOna011atlnbmel MDf ArWysly Yev.2005 TemPonbn (F): 50 Sevsan: Wmkr Emla: venbn : Emlp[2W> Yt J Nov 13008 f V Lettl Ufe Tyye Summary o Lend en Rcreepe Tnp Fele Unll iyye Np. Un16 ToblTnps TanIVMT Slryle hmlM liouzllp ].9] 0.5> Mnllpp uNC 2100 22041 3.23].13 WNYbwNmegenenl d8q 5.86 EwNYry uMb 15W 1]950 4440.18 General olhe dibirq 20.9] 10004q 11 Id.W 29]59 2,Be].91 BS] 19 8,&51.52 VMltle Flrel Mlx VMICIe Type Percent Tyq NanCablysl Cetelyal Dieael 69MApb 51.6 1.] BJ.B Od l§M Truc4 e31WM 2.d <.1 01.8 d.1 LpM imG AS1di501ps 23.8 O.B 09.1 O,D MeE Trvc4 A51d5001W tO.B O.q 99.1 0.0 W>Neery TmcN 8501-10,OOD Ipt 1.8 0.0 81] 18.8 111aNeevyTrvck 10.001-1g0001pe 0.5 00 W.0 40.0 MM-Ha.y iiuck ld,W133,0001b 0.9 0.0 T13 ]i8 NeayNeary TruPY ]].COtEO,MOW 05 0.0 0.0 iC0.0 oBwem o.l D.D Bo Beo.o umen Bpa oe 9.D oo IBO.B MpbrryUe 3.B 18.6 21A 0.0 $rlwl ers Od 0.0 0.0 100.0 6bgr Npmy 0.9 11.1 Tl.B It.l iaN fcMlSOm Rmb.nnd CwnmD'del Mmm>WOrM Hpmo-9lbp Mom•Obr Wmmpb NprvWwN Cusbmn Ubsn Ttlp LwgN (tulles) 12] 10 9.5 IJ.J 1< 89 Ruy Trip LenpSr(Mles) 11.6 @1 1dB 15.1 4B 12.8 Trq apeegs (mpnl ]B.D Bo.B ]B.o 3DO 9B.B w.e x prtrrys~Rabmpa n.e IB.o d9a x o1 Tnpe - Wmmwclal (pv le^0 ue6) General dOm pulblip ]50 11.5 G1.5 Page: 1 911 OI2007 2:57:47 PM Urbemis 2007 Version 9.2.0 Combined Summer Emissions Reports (Pounds/Day) File Name: U:1UcJobs\_03600-04000\_03700\037311Urbemis\03731 Operations-LSTs.urb9 Project Name: Grove Ave and Foothill Blvd Residential Operations Project Location: South Coast AOMD On-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: Version : Emfac2007 V2.3 Nov 1 2006 Off-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: OFFROAD2007 jS~mcnrt~a a~r~fFf30port "N~~ ~ ~I t4ll"P131g~LiNM u~~~uuypn~~'i ~~ yC" '~•x v. ~ ~ ~ ~ fr~,E~1~Niihis I ... ~ ,I. ~. ~vs a[~ E kx t F1F.~ `~#u14~~1 AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES 1344 N9x S<.4 X42 PM10 PM2.5 TOTALS (Ibs/day, unmitigated) 6.05 1.57 5.11 0.00 0.01 0.01 OPERATIONAL (VEHICLE) EMISSION ESTIMATES 89,4 ~ Sc4 $42 PM70 PM2.5 TOTALS (Ibs/day, unmitigated) 3.98 1.83 23.39 0.00 0.85 0.18 SUM OF AREA SOURCE AND OPERATIONAL EMISSION ESTIMATES 13451 N9S 44 ~ PM10 PM2.5 TOTALS (Ibs/day, unmitigated) 10.03 3.40 28.50 0.00 0.86 0.19 -D W N V Page:1 911012007 2:58:06 PM Urbemis 2007 Version 9.2.0 Combined Winter Emissions Reports (Pounds/Day) File Name: U:1UcJobs\_03600-04000\_03700\03731\Urbemis\03731 Operations-LSTs.urb9 Project Name: Grove Ave and Foothill Blvd Residential Operations Project Location: South Coast AOMD On-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: Version : Emfac2007 V2.3 Nov 1 2006 Off-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: OFFROAD2007 5u'rniiiary Reportsi: ~ I !~+ is s+r hli ~ ' =!? aFine AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES 134 d4x ~4 ~ PM] Q PId2.~ TOTALS (Ibs day, unmitigated) 5.61 2.13 0.94 0.00 0.05 0.05 OPERATIONAL (VEHICLE) EMISSION ESTIMATES BQC NQ ~ ~ PM70 PM2.5 TOTALS (Ibs/day, unmitigatetl) 2.99 2.41 28.34 0.00 0.85 0.19 SUM OF AREA SOURCE AND OPERATIONAL EMISSION ESTIMATES ' 1395'z N9x SR ~Q2 PM10 PM2.5 TOTALS (Ibs/day, unmitigated) 8.60 4.54 29.28 0.00 0.90 0.23 -O W N tb P329 COUNCILMAN REX GUTIERREZ July 3, 2007 ~ECE~i/Eb JUG. 03 ~~~ ~` ~~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CLERK Dear Sirs: Tlvs letter is to formally appeal the Planning Commission'sF-Tune 26, 2007 approval of design review and tentative subdivision map for'the Arbors at Route 66 project, DRC2006-00341 and SUBT'T18179. I understand that the other portions of the applicant's request aze already before the City Council for review. Please notify me otherwise. Since -~; Rex Gutierr z Councilman ~~ T~ ~~ EXHIBIT AB ~'P330 DONALD J. KURTH, A<.._ . THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Mayor Pro Tem D1ANE WILLIAMS Councilmemben REX GUTIERREZ L. DENNIS MICHAEL SAM SPAGNOLO City Manager JACx LAM, AICP -~- RANCHO C,UCAMONGA -.-\_ (~ l / W a~V ~. ~-e_- ~ ~ ~,~ a 1 \ -e""•" ` ~ ~ ~ v d ~oY" \\ ~ rti~ o.~,v-P` ~~-~,. ~.'~ ~.l` ~..~ ~ ,..1~-~--x-18 I `~ `~ J ~ ~~~.~ ~ .~~ 10500 Civic Cen[er Dc • P.O. Box 807 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 • Tel 909-477-2700 • Fax 909-477-2849 • wryvw.ci.rancho-curamonga.ca.us 07/05/2007 16:22 8189069959 METROPOLITAN PAGE 02/02 P331 ARBORS AT ROUTE 66; LLC 16661 Vennrra Blvd, Suite N71T Encino, California 91936 Phn: (618) 325-8840 Fax: (818) 90Cr9859 V!A FACSIMILE & U.S. MA.ZL CITY OF RANCHO CUCANiONGA JUL 0 5 2007 July 5, 2007 RECEIVED - PLANfdING Debra Adams City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 1O5000ivic Center Drive Rancho C~lcamonga, CA 91730 Re: Arbors at Route 66 Northeast Comer of Foothill & Grove Tentative Tract Map # 18179 & DRC 2006-00341 Dear City Clerk: We have determined that it is in the best interests of all persons concerned with the above referenced project that all portions of the project be considered simultaneously by the City Council and that the City Council conduct one hearing pertaining to the project. Accordingly, we hereby waive the effect of that provision of the Subdivision.Title of Ule Murucipal Code which would have required that the subdivision be considered by the Ciry Council within 30 days of the appeal filed. Further, we hereby request that the Ciry Council considered all portions of the project simultaneously and that the City Council conduct one consolidated hearing on the project. On Behalf of Arbors at Route 66, LI,C, ~, . ~°~-~ Jason l~amim Managez CC: Peter Bachmann 07/05/2007 16:22 9199069859 METROPOLITAN PAGE 91/0P332 RECEIVED - P~gNfdING Arbors at Route 66, 16661 Ventum Bfvd, Suite 712 Encino, Catijornia 91436 Phn:(818)325-8840 Fax: (818)906-9859 LLaT1' OF RANCHO CUCAMpNGA JUG 0 ~ 2007 FAX TRANSMTTTAL COVER SHEET Hard AES'I'INATION FIRM PHONE # FAX # Copy Y/N Debra Adams City Clerk 909-477-2700 (909) 919-2905 N Vance Pomeroy Planning 909-477-2750 (909) 477-2847 N Date: July 5, 2007 From: Jason Kamm # of Pages 2 (Includiag Cover Sheet) P333 EXHIBIT V IS PROVIDED UNDER SEPARATE COVER EXHIBIT AC _ ENVIRONMENTAL - INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) Clry of Rancho Cucamonga ~ (Please type or print cleady using ink. Use the fab key ro move from one line ro the next line.) Planning Division (90B) 477-2750 - The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note thatit is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete,3t the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to pedorm work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: Project Title: Foothill & Grove Name & Address of project owner(s): San Antonio Community Hospital 999 San Bernardino Road, Upland, CA 91786 Name & Address of developer or project sponsor: Peter Bachmann, Kamm Realty, Inc. 16661 Ventura Blvd. Suite 712 Encino, CA 91436 Contact Person & Address: Ghuck Buqu - j a.5... Ka.., mr ~' loony ~ i~v/~e r; ` L / Ci ~~• l (-rt~r~ : ~r.sEe 7l zl ~Y+~. ~G. %~f '7 /y3G Name 8 Address of person preparing this form (if different from above): P334 rcorw/ Talenhnnw Numhcr~ 9t1R-dR'I-1 R22 EXHIBIT A D Page 1 of 9 Created on 3/4/2006 1:28 PM P335 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite ail souroes of information (books, published reports and oral history): There are no known historical aspects of this site. 11) Describe any noise sources and theirlevels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will affect proposed uses: existing road way noise which and should have no major impact on use. 12) Descnbe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are prooosed phases for development, the extent o/ development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: GPA f lino on City of Rancho Cucamong Initial Study.doc Page 3 of 9 Created on 3/14/2006 1:28 PM 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-(amity, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and sca/e of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): West -Existing Residential North -Red Hill Countv Club East -Existing older shopping center South -Foothill 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the project? No. Seejustifcation statement 15) Indicate the type of shoR-tens and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses. What methods of soundproofing are proposed? Land use amendment only. '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains: None. P336 City of Rancho Cucamong Initial Study.doc Page 4 of 9 Created on 3/14/2006 1:28 PM 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential (gal/day) 0.00 Peak use (gal/Day) b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) 0.00 Peak use (gaUmin/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ^ Septic Tank ^ Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach peroolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distnct at 987-2591. a. Residential (gal/day) 0.00 b. CommerciaUlndustrial (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units: Detached (indicate range o/parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Land Use Amendment Only Attached (indicate whether units an= rental or for sale units): TBD, Land Use Amendment Only 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price(s) $ to $ Rent (per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: ~ . P337 City of Rancho Cucamong Initial Study.doc Page 5 of 9 Created on 3/14/2006 1:28 PM P338 24J Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: b. Junior High: c. Senior High COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descdbe type of use(s) and major function(s) o(commemial, industrial or institutional uses: Use Amendment 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: N/A 27) Indicate hours of operation: N/A 28) Number of employees: .Total: Maximum Shift: 0 Time of Maximum Shift: 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication o/the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): NIA 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: N/A '31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Ccast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283): City of Rancho Cucamong Initial Study.doc Page 6 of 9 Created on 3/142006 1:28 PM P339 ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response. All agencies contacted have indicated their ability to provide services to the project. 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, bul are not limited to PCB's; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or dischan,7e on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known. None. Land Use Amendment Only. 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shalt be shown andiabeled on the application plans. None. Land Use Amendment Only. 1 hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information 2quiBd for adequate evaluation ofthis project to the best ofmy ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belie% 1 further understand that additional information maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City o(Rancho Cucamonga. Date: 3/15/06 Signature: ~~ Title: Chuck Buguet Charles Joseph Associates City of Rancho Cucamong Initial Study.doc Page 7 of 9 Created on 3/14/2006 1:28 PM 1 opoGOne - vruage lirove ~noppmg l;enter, UJIiJ VN'1'AKlI) (l;A)'l~opo Map t" : ~ s . „ -- - , ~ ~ .--,. ,,~ f '~re~ I ~.. . ~ c + if it 'Suns~Uan -~ - ~ ~..fJ I 1 y ( ~( ~ : ~ 141YA c -. I!!IJ 'rp ~fR ~IRtiln $2 S17 -w-.- 'j ':~~ 1 ~ i Via...-..... ~ I n~~ w-s..-•{L t ro ~ ~ I p ~ .~~ - ~-W.. b-'- -1' - F17 ,,~ Win` I i %~~au*`'~ '.~'~-*" t~~ 1-y''Y' :a ~ m r '}c '•` t~r + ' . , i `~ ,r x (. ~7 . i o l ~ .._,r~ _ Fy.,, + Y,7 ; ~ ~ ^ , ~ ~ - i p .ye ss,~.. i Jr.. s.~ a ~ 1 ~~- G ' . ~'i L,t ~' ~MT!wnl nr;ce 4~7~o- q~~xlc.~ I '1tC ~'~j¢ l•J'11A7'4/i~AS~rjl~~+ .. +e yD "RIYC~ C r' A ~,{ I ~bothlfl Fn~th ~ ~I4~`~er~~=cr ' e'~ia F~ J (i ~ ~. ~ 4 ~;..r `l 'A III l~ r 6°p:[~itl 'd • Ri x~ ~ ~ .i .,.r4+ 1 i~~•rrK ~ SS I~q~, R~Y_c=-aU ~~~fK ~. ,~ ~ _ T , J ~1' ~,,; ~~ ~~ _ ~Liw-~~ ~P~1r9 {bt~r~ r >72 ~ _ ti$i...~7&bT'S cs~ ~~ 'al,€ .r'~ar4,.vJ~~r'.I 7rI - .~~{ _ d I I' ~~ • _.-1' 1 Cr Im~r"~n~~,~1c,,~`~ Piz, 1xtlon ~ -x~', s1 ~ e t ~, x+:,~,^r h w „I Rwtirn rc Y~ c ~~i ~+~T 7J;: I Y?`y'x ,,5~~.* ~ F. e_y .or r ~". '~I ! ~ s .;r' GnA ~ -t:.,.. t.~. 1 ' as Yage 1 of 1 P340 4- ~ '. J"1 . z f` `~~ Yi !"~ ~? ~ J, aR~; li'E ~• _ -r . h ~~ ,~ ~' ~;; . a= -, I L ~: ~_ ~~ >J tti ~ 9zi~.l ~--~ ~ } 1 ~. i+ll ~ .t feG - i~ ~ ~' 1 _t. ~. / rf is b ,3 I V~ . al'0. ` ,... ;, ~, ,~ • ~ Ylr 1 U .'~..a a°r _ u. .F..L~.H rf ~4 .~4_w~~l- •Rrl~lJ w4r5~ j IKRSKJo I ~ - _ •~ ~`i,~ t~C~~R`~'xr-' - n5 J 0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 km G 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 mi UTM 11 442137E 3774005N(NAD27) Village Grove Shopping Center, USGS ONTARIO (CA) Quadrangle M=13.424 Projection is UTM Zone 11 NAD83 Datum G--0.352 http: //www.topozone.com/print. asp?lat=34.10702&lon=-117.6273 5 &size=l&u=4&layer=... 5/3 0/2007 Property The site is approximately 10 acres at the northeast comer of Foothill and Grove at the border of Rancho Cucamonga and Upland. It is currently largely vacant land used as a strawberry farm with 3 single family residences owned by the San Antonio Community Hospital. w A P342 View across Site to the North from Red Hill Country Club Drive View of Site along Red Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill (at far left side) P343 View Northerly along Grove side of Site P344 View of Reaz of Site (from Grove looking East -Upland single family homes behind trees on the left) View of Eastern property line adjacent to Red Hill Country Club P345 Adjacent Uses View from Country Club to Northeast corner property line of Site P346 View to the Northern property line and one of the 4 single family homes in Upland P347 Picture of retail at Southwest corner of Foothill & Grove looking across Foothill (in Upland) P348 BACKGROUND Project Files: City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00223 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC - A request to change the land use designation for four parcels on Red Hill Country Club Drive from Open Space to Mixed Use to be consistent with the Mixed Use land use designation at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue, to add these same four parcels to Section 2.5.5.4 Western Gateway in the Bear Gulch Area, expand the range of development in the Residential classification to 87% in Table III-7, and to establish a Master Plan Overlay District for the entire 10.1 acre project site on the Land Use Plan in accordance with Section 111.2.4.1 of the General Plan -APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 and 45. Related Files: Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179, Development Review DRC2006- 00341. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2006-00350 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC - A request to change the zoning for four parcels on Red Hill Country Club Drive from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Mixed Use to be consistent with the Mixed Use zoning designation at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue; Establish a Master Plan Overlay District for the entire 10.1 acre project site on the Development District Map in accordance with Section 17.20.030 of the Development Code; at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue -APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 and 45. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179, and Development Review DRC2006-00341. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2007-00029 - ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC - A request to change the table for the Bear Gulch Mixed-Use area contained in Development Code Section 17.32.020.0.3 to expand the range of development in the Residential classification to 87% and to include the "Most Case" column found in the General Plan Table III.7 -APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 and 45. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006 00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, Tentative Tract Map SU8TT18179, and Development Review DRC2006-00341. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC -Condominium subdivision of 10.1 acres into two lots with office condominiums in one office building on Lot 1, and residential condominiums in 7 live/work units, 68 townhomes, and 23 single-family residences on Lot 2 at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue in the Mixed Use Zone of Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts - APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 and 45. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, and Development Review DRC2006-00341. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00341 • ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC -Master Plan established under General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223 and Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350 fora 10.1 acre project site with one 2-story office building, 7 live/work units, 68 town homes, and 23 single-family residences at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue in the Mixed Use Zone of Subarea 1 of the Foothill P349 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 2 Boulevard Districts, including expansion of the range of development in the Residential classification to 87% in Table III-7 of the General Plan. APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44, and 45. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006 00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179. 2. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Kamm Realty, Inc. 16661 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 712 Encino, CA 91436 3. General Plan Designation: Mixed Use: Western Gateway in the Bear Gulch Area, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; Low Residential (2.4 dwelling units per acre). 4. Zoning: Mixed Use: Foothill Boulevard Districts Subarea 1; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre). 5. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Single-family residential in the City of Upland at the northwest project boundary; commercial retail and office uses in the City of Upland to the west; golf course to the northeast; single-family residential at the southeast boundary; and gas station and other commercial uses to the south. Currently, the site contains a strawberry farm and several farm-related structures and one former residence. 6. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 7. Contact Person and Phone Number: Vance Pomeroy, Contract Planner (909)477-2750 8. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVW D -Cucamonga Valley W ater District EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,p -Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District SW PPP -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G P350 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (/) Aesthetics (/) Agricultural Resources (/) Air Quality (/) Biological Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Geology & Soils ()Hazards & Waste Materials (/) Hydrology & Water Quality ()Land Use & Planning ()Mineral Resources (/) Noise ()Population & Housing ()Public Services ()Recreation () Transportation/Traffic ()Utilities & Service Systems ()Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: () I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (/) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect i ase because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project pr ponent. A ITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Prepared By: Reviewed By: Date: ~ '~~ Date: ~/~1.~/Q~ P351 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 4 Lass Then ' SiBnificent less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 Fatennanr slpnuicant wan Mi~lpauon Tnan signuicant Na I ecf Inco oretetl Imaecf I ecf EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vista? () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not () () () (/) limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () (/) ( ) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which () () (/) ( ) would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. c) The site is located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue with substantial frontage on the north side of Red Hill Country Club Drive and is characterized by residential and recreational development to the north and to the east, and commercial development to the south and to the west. Although the subject site has been used for agricultural purposes since prior to the development of the surrounding residential properties and the project will impose a notably different streetscape, the visual quality of the area will not significantly degrade as a result of the project. Design review is required prior to approval. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The project would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. The impact is not considered significant. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland () () (/) ( ) of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Williamson Act contract? P352 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 5 Less Then $ipnllicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 Fnandaliy Significant With Mtitipallon Than Significant No Imoan Inco orated Impan Irroect c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, () () (/) ( ) due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance by the state Department of Conservation Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. The site is located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue with substantial frontage on the north side of Red Hill Country Club Drive and is characterized by residential and recreational development to the north and east and commercial development to the south and west. There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2. The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. c) The site is located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue with substantial frontage on the north side of Red Hill Country Club Drive and is characterized by residential and recreational development to the north and to the east and commercial development to the south and to the west. The project site is now developed with agricultural uses and structures and has hosted agricultural activities since at least 1927. The nearest other agricultural use is more than 2 miles southeast from the project site. Although the site is a proven, viable agricultural property, long-term future compatibility issues limit the utility of this small site for continued agricultural activities. Therefore, the impact of the removal of this farmland is less-than-significant. 3. AIR DUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable () () () (/) air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially () (/) () ( ) to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any () () () (/) criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations? P353 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 6 Less Tien Significant Less Issues, and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Pe,antialir Sipnilicam wi,n Mitigation man Significant No Im ecl Inco orated Im aft Im en e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number () () () (/) of people? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again. Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a project specific basis. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that ali construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAt]MD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 401, 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. P354 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 7 Lass Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 Potentially Signllicent witn Mitigation rnan Significant No Im act Inco oratatl Impecl Irroaq • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water duality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM~o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWoC6) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~g emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6). Based upon the Urban Emissions Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) model estimates in Table 5.6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nitrogen Oxides (Nox), Reactive Organic Gases (ROG), and Fine Particulate Matter (PM~g) would exceed South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) thresholds for significance; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5.6-4 of the General Plan FEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. 'The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). P355 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 8 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 Pptennaor Signilican, wnn Mitiga,ion Than Significant Nc Impact Inco oretetl ImpeC, I act 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. An.Air Quality Impact Analysis, dated May 15, 2006, was prepared for this project by Urban Crossroads. The analysis concluded that, if mitigated, no significant level of emissions would result from the construction activity of this project. Additional mitigation measures to reach this level beyond those enumerated above are: 16) Use of Zero-VOC paints (assumes no more than 100 grams/liter of VOC) such as those listed by the SCAQMD of Super-Compliant Architectural Coating Manufacturers. c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to.create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels. e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse .impacts are anticipated. P356 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 9 Less Then Signilicam Lesa Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 Po+aniauy Significant wim Miligarion men Sipnllicam No Impan Inco ratetl Imoan I an 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (/) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or () () () (/) other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected () () () (/) wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Intertere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting () () (/) ( ) biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located in an area developed with residential, commercial, and agricultural uses. The site has been previously disrupted since at least 1927 with intense agricultural activity which has completely replaced the native biological diversity of the site. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. c) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed. No adverse impacts are anticipated. P357 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DFtC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 10 Less Than $ipnificant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g amamlany Sipnllicent wim Mitigation Tnan Significant No I ect Inco oratatl Irtgact Imoacl e) There are heritage trees on the project site; therefore, the proposed project is in conflict with the local ordinance. An Arborist Report and Tree Survey, dated April 18, 2006, was prepared by Steve F. Andresen for the project site. Based on the analysis of this report, no fewer than 12 trees on the site are heritage trees of average or better condition. These trees will need to be removed in order to accommodate the grading and siting of the project. In order to mitigate the impact of their removal, the following measure is necessary: 1) A Tree Removal Permit must be approved that provides for the replacement of the 12 trees on a 1:1 ratio basis with no fewer than two California Sycamores (Platanus Racemosa) placed in a prominent location in the project. f) The project site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () () () (/) of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () (/) () ( ) of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments• a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). There will be no impact. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Pian FEIR (Section 5.11). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor constructiori activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. P358 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 11 Less Tnan Sipnilicent less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g aptamianr Significant wun Mitigation man Significant No Im aM Incamaretetl Impact Impatt • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The project site has already been disrupted by intense agricultural activity since at least 1927. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety P359 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 12 Less Then $pnlflCOnt 1.066 Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Potamiany $ipniticant wnn Mitipa6on Than $Ipnllicant No 1 an Inromoratatl I act InDan Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, nc mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated () () () (/) on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? () () () (/) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including () () () (/) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? () () () (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or () () () (/) that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B () () () (/) of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of () () () (/) septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5.1 of the General Plan FEIR. The Red Hill Fault, passes within 0.15 mile southeast of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 3.2 miles north. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes, is northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas Fault, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant. b) The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. P360 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 13 Less Then Sipnilicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Poten,laly Sipnlticam wlm Mitipavon man Sipnificarn No Inpaq Incorooratetl Imoect Irrped Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWoCB) daily to reduce PM~p emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~p emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMtp emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW~CB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~p emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer. The project would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer. The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5.1-2. Soil types on-site consist of Soboba Gravelly Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5.1-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Soboba Gravelly Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V•3 and General Pian FEIR Exhibit 5.1-3. These soils are typically acceptable for construction. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? P361 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 14 less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 aptanrany Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No' 1 act Inco orztetl Impact Impatl d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ~) ~) ~) ~/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ~) ~) ~) ~/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would () ~) ~) ~/) the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically intertere with an ~) ~) ~) ~/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, ~) ~) ~) ~/) injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) The project will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state. The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements. The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are expected. b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state. The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements. The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site. The project site is located within 1 mile of the nearest existing or proposed school. Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. P362 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 15 Less Than SiOnificant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 Potan,ially Sipnifcam wi,n Mifigauon Than $IANfCdnf No Impact Incorporacetl Irtnaa Inpaa e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 3 1/3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005; however, the proposed project site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7. 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER DUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () () (/) ( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (/) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (/) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (/) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the () () () (/) capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? () () () (/) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () (). () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that () () () (/) would impede or redirect flood flows? P363 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 16 Lass man SipniHCant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 amaneanr Sipnificant wnn Mltipation man Significant No Impart InmryoreteE Impact Impact i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (/) injury or death involving tlooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? O O O (/) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare a SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the construction contractor of the project will be required to prepare a SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post- construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Fuscoe Engineering on July 3, 2006, that identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non- structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various business plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent: P364 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 17 Less Then Sipnificent Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 Potantial~y Significant with Mhipallon Than Sipnifcant No Irt'oan Incorooretetl Irtroen Imoen Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational: 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP) prepared by Fuscoe Engineering on July 3, 2006, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits. b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins. CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2. The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation; however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact; however, CVW D has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities. P365 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 18 Less Than • SiB^ificant less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp 9 Polanuany Significant wan Mitipauon roan Sipnificartl No Irtgad Inca orated I atl Impart c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development or significant redevelopment; therefore, is required to comply with the NPDES to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WOMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected. h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected. P366 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 19 Less Then Signilicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g amenvally Signilicant wnh Mitigeuon Tnan Signifcent No I ect Incomotatetl Im ect Impel The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected. There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or () () () (/) natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue with substantial frontage on the north side of Red Hill Country Club Drive and is characterized by residential and recreational development to the north and east and commercial development to the south and west. The project will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is Mixed Use and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre). The proposed project includes a request to amend the General Plan to change the portion of the project designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to the Mixed Use designation. While this requested amendment to the General Plan may or may not conflict with any other planning practices, it does not significantly interfere with any policies for environmental protection. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. P367 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 20 Less Then Sipnilicant Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Potamialm SiBnificent wnn MltiBation Tnan Sipnlilcent No Impact Incomoretetl Impact I act 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral U O O (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments• a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1; therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (/) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration. or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels () () () (/) in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient () (/) () ( ) noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would () () () (/) the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is not within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out. However a Noise Study, dated June 12, 2006, (Revised), was prepared for the project by Urban Crossroads. The study concluded that, if left unmitigated, the traffic related noise levels would exceed the City of Rancho Cucamonga standards. Mitigation measures listed below would reduce exterior and interior noise levels to less-than-significant levels: P368 Initial Study fdr City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 21 Less Than Sipnilicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Pptenuany Significant With MitigaGOn Than Sipnilicant No I ad Incomomtetl Impact Im act Exterior: 1) Construct a 5-foot high barrier for Lots (Units) 7 through 10 and Lots (Units) 72 through 92 facing Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue. 2) Construct a 5-foot high second floor balcony noise barrier for Lots (Units) 88 and 89 facing Foothill Boulevard. Interior: 3) Provide a "windows closed" condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation for all homes. 4) Provide standard dual-glazed windows with a Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 26 or higher for all units and homes facing Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. 5) To minimize the potential interior noise impacts, lots (units) facing Foothill Boulevard should be provided with weather-stripped solid core exterior doors, and exterior wall/roof assemblies should be free of cut outs and openings. b) The uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic; hence are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 6) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 7) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property Tine. The developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 8) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. P369 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 22 less man Significant less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Pmantiaur Significant wnn Mitigation man Significant No Im act Incomararetl Im act Im act The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment; however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: • 9) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. It is located approximately 3 1/3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (/) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the () () () (/) construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. Once constructed, the proposed office portion of the mixed use project will have a limited number of employees; hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a majority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or .surrounding communities. No impacts are anticipated. b) The project site contains no existing housing units. No adverse impact expected. c) The project site is not residential land. No impacts are anticipated. P37O Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 23 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Potemlally Significant wan Mitigation man Signiiicem No I ect Intoryoratetl Impatl I ad 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered govemmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? () () () (/) b) Police protection? () () () (/) c) Schools? () () () (/) d) Parks? () () () (/) e) Other public facilities? () () () (/) Comments: a) The site, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue, would be served by a fire station located approximately 1 4/5 mile from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project so no impacts to fire services will occur. No impacts are anticipated. b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. c) The Central School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the project area. Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the School Impact Fees. With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located 3/4 of a mile from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9.9), the projected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the projected demand. The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has opened a new P371 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 24 Less Then Sipnificent Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Pafantiany Sipnilicant wi,h Mitigation Than Sipnificam No Irroect Incorooretetl I acl Irtpact library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the projected need of 15,500 square feet at build out of the City. 14. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional () () () (/) parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require () () () (/) the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located 3/4 of a mile from the project site. This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above. 15. TRANSPORTATIONlfRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in () () () (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either () () () (/) an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? () (.) () (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Comments: a) A Traffic Study, dated March 20, 2007, was prepared for this project by RBF Consulting. The analysis of the study determined that implementation of the proposed project will generate 799 vehicle trips daily. The proposed project includes the development of 23 single-family P372 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 25 Less man 5ipnifrant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 Pp,an,iany Sipnipcant wun Mtligalion .non Significant No Impact Inco ora,atl Impact Impact units, 68 multiple-family units, 7 live/work units, and approximately 12,610 square feet of general office space. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is generally consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing, or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections as the Level of Service (LOS) rating for the nearby intersections will remain at "C" with the forecast increase in trips and movements. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development Fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. b) The Traffic Study, dated March 20, 2007, and prepared for this project by RBF Consulting estimates that the project will generate 151 two-way peak hour trips daily. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted Transportation Development Fee prior to .issuance of building permits. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. c) Located approximately 3 1/3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access. One access point for the project at the southeast corner of the site is for emergency ingress and egress only. No impacts are anticipated. The project design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity. No impacts are anticipated. g) The project design includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc.). P373 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 26 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 Pptan,ially Sipnilicam with Mitigation Than Sipnlfmant No hryad Incorppmtetl I an Impact 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water () () () (/) drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to () () () (/) accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Bdard regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project is served by the CVW D water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. P374 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 27 lass Than Sipnifiwnt Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 aacenuanr Sipnilicant wan Mitigation man significant No I act Inwmareietl Imoatl Impact Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality () () () (/) of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3. Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed. Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan. Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. P375 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 28 c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive: (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #68020115, certified January 4, 1989) (/) Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan EIR (SCH #87021615, certified September 16, 1987) (/) Foothill/Grove Mixed-Use Project Traffic Impact Analysis, RBF Consulting, Irvine, California, March 20, 2007 (/) Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard Residential /Commercial Development Noise Study, Urban Crossroads, Irvine, California, June 2, 2006, June 12, 2006 (Revised) (/) Foothill/Grove Mixed-Use Project Air Quality Impact Analysis, Urban Crossroads, Irvine, California, May 15, 2006 (/) Arborist Report and Tree Survey for Tentative Tract Redhill/Grove, Steve F. Andresen Arborist Services, Riverside, California, April 18, 2006 P376 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 8 DRC2006-00341 Page 29 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Applicant's ~, ~Cc~u.~-~ Date: ~ / 3C I ~C~7 Print Name and Title: TQSOC~ ~- (1O~d'cv~^'~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00223, DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2006-00350, DEVELOPMENTCODEAMENDMENT DRC2007-00029, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18179, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00341 Public Review Period Closes: June 27, 2007 Project Name: Project Applicant: Arbors at Route 66, LLC Project Location (also see attached map): Located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue-APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44, and 45. Project Description: A request to change the land use designation from Open Space to Mixed Use to be consistent with the Mixed Use land use designation and to change the zoning from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Mixed Use to be consistent with the Mixed Use zoning designation forfour parcels on Redhill Country Club Drive at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue, and to add these same four parcels to Section 2.5.5.4 Western Gateway in the Bear Gulch Area, to change the table for the Bear Gulch Mixed-Use area contained in Development Code Section 17.32.020.0.3 to expand the range of development in the Residential classification to 87% and to include the "Most Case" column found in the General Plan Table III-7, and to establish a Master Plan Overlay District for the entire 10.1 acre project site on the Land Use Plan in accordance with Section 111.2.4.1 of the General Plan and on the Development District Map in accordance with Section 17.20.030 of the Development Code; and to subdivide 10.1 acres into two lots for the purpose of developing one 2-story office building on Lot 1 and 7 live/work units, 68 town homes, and 23 single-family residences on Lot 2 in the Mixed Use Zone of Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. September 19 2007 Date of Determination Adopted By P377 P378 RESOLUTION NO. 07- ZZ O A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00223, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR FOUR PARCELS ON RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE FROM OPEN SPACE TO MIXED USE TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE MIXED USE LAND USE DESIGNATION AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND GROVE AVENUE, TO ADD THESE SAME FOUR PARCELS TO SECTION 2.5.5.4 WESTERN GATEWAY IN THE BEAR GULCH AREA, EXPAND THE RANGE OF DEVELOPMENT IN THE RESIDENTIAL CLASSIFICATION TO 87 PERCENT IN TABLE III-7, AND TO ESTABLISH A MASTER PLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT FOR THE ENTIRE 10.1 ACRE PROJECT SITE ON THE LAND USE PLAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 111.2.4.4 OF THE GENERAL PLAN; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44, AND 45. A. Recitals. 1. Arbors at Route 66, LLC filed an application for General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On September 19, 2007, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on September19, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 10.1 acres of land, basically an irregular quadrangle configuration, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue and is presently agriculturally and residentially developed. The residentially. developed portion of said property subject to a Land Use Designation change, roughly the four parcels in the easterly 1.04 acre of the subject property, is currently designated as Open Space and is not included in the Western Gateway in the Bear Gulch area; and b. The property to the north portion of said property subject to a Land Use Designation change is designated Open Space. The property to the west is designated Mixed Use and is included in the Western Gateway in the Bear Gulch area. The property to the east is designated Open Space. The property to the south is designated Mixed Use and is included in the Western Gateway in the Bear Gulch area. The remainder of the subject property is designated Mixed Use and is included in the Western Gateway in the Bear Gulch area. c. Portions of the City designated for Mixed Use can benefit from the application of a required Master Plan Overlay District with a carefully designed development; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-XX DRC2006-00223 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 2 P379 d. This General Plan Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and e. This General Plan Amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and f. This General Plan Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed General Plan Amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. That the proposed General Plan Amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council furtherfinds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. Based on these findings, the City Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The City Council therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-XX DRC2006-00223 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 3 d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below: Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low- emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 401, 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. P380 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-XX DRC2006-00223 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 4 Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high- efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 16) Use of Zero-VOC paints (assumes no more than 100 grams/liter of VOC) such as those listed by the SCAQMD of Super-Compliant Architectural Coating Manufacturers. Biological Resources 1) A Tree Removal Permit must be approved that provides for the replacement of the 12 on a 1:1 ratio basis with no fewer than two California Sycamores (Platanus Racemosa) placed in a prominent location in the project. P381 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-XX DRC2006-00223 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 5 Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed •salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). P382 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-XX DRC2006-00223 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 6 Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PMio emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submitto Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. P383 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-XX DRC2006-00223 - ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 7 Post- Construction Operational 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Fuscoe Engineering on July 3, 2006, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans forthese areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise Exterior.• 1) Construct a 5-foot high barrier for Lots (Units) 7 through 10 and Lots (Units) 72 through 92 facing Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue. 2) Construct a 5-foot high second floor balcony noise barrier for Lots (Units) 88 and 89 facing Foothill Boulevard. Interior.• 3) Provide a "windows closed" condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation for all homes. 4) Provide standard dual-glazed windows with a Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 26 or higher for all units and homes facing Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. 5) To minimize the potential interior noise impacts, lots (units) facing Foothill Boulevard should be provided with weather-stripped solid core exterior doors, and exterior wall/roof assemblies should be free of cut outs and openings. P384 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-XX DRC2006-00223 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 8 6) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 7) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 8) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. 9) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. P385 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. P386 Exhibit A TABLE III-7 WESTERN FOOTHILL CORRIDOR- WESTERN GATEWAY ~'w .w ,.`~, `y h ~~ ~ ~~ .~ ~+~~~" x~ ~ ~ a ~ c L , ~ ~.t Acrea eRari e /"t ~ ~ g 9 r y r ''`~} ,~~•~. ' „~ ;: r ~ ~ , , ~' ,~, ~ 4 , ;.~ ; ~ ip w~r~ ~,~, tiG~ .,~~~) ;~ , N~t. ,~ ,,, r , . Average Denstty " EstiFnat d* '~ ~ ~ ~~1~ ;«" ~, b „~; ~ "~~: , ~ n , ~;, ~ Percent~r~= ~ ,~, K i ~" a ~ti~ r ~u~ , ; (du/acre);, Most Case ,,, ~, ~ t. r ~ ~A Land Use ~+ ~ ~ I i ~~~- f ~ ~. Range d~ ~ X1 ~ F A~~it b "tea, ,+ ~ - ~ i` (du%acre) 4 k ~ „ ti „ ~ , , , , ; 4, ~~,u~;~~, , w~~r . , Dwellirig Units ~~ ,, Commercial -retail, service 50% to 70% 27.5 to 38.5 acres 38.5 acres Commercial -tourist commercial; office commercial and rofessional Residential 30% to 87% 16.5 to 27.5 acres @ 16.5 acres 14 dulacre' 14 du/acre 231 to 385 dwelling units 231 dwelling units TOTALS 100 percent 55 acres 55 acres Indicates target density not a range. Actual density may increase up to 20 du/acre as long as the total of 231 dwelling units is not exceeded. P387 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00341, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT18179 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitig'atiort measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Compgnents -This MMP contains the following elements: Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project: 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 P388 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00341, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT18179 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms foran impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with. any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Departmentshall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report oh the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00341. DRC2006-00350. DRC2007-00029 SUBTf18179 Applicant: Arbors at Route 66 LLC Initial Study Prepared by: Vance Pomeroy, Contract Planner Date: May 21, 2007 -. . . ~. Qli~~~~ ~~I~' ~ . 'Yrv ~`u e ~LV'Y w.. xy ~ F.G ~ .t+..v ~-/i'su ~F.lJ~~fe~~1~~a G'.~3w _ !. _ ~ ..-c,. ~e •,. All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the CP/BO C Review of plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Qualify Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 401, 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall , include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering. 1 of 9 w - .. - - Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., • BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction SCAOMD Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction suitable means. The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and construction Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans A/C 4 alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 2 of 9 W 0 - - - .. All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs BO C Review of plans A 4 requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate CP C Review of plans A/C 2/3 preferential parking for vanpools. All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of plans D 2/3 more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of plans D 2/3 more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C 2/4 required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C Z/4 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Use of Zero-VOC paints (assumes no more than 100 BO C/D Review of Plans C 2/4 grams/liter of VOC) such as those listed by the SCAQMD of Super-Compliant Architectural Coating Manufactu rers. j~ ~~e~r~Kle~ U . .. . :. .i .. ~ < i ,r A Tree Removal Permit must be approved that provides CP B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 for the replacement of the 12 trees on a 1:1 ratio basis with no fewer than two California Sycamores (Platanus Racemosa) placed in a prominent location in the project. u~ t~ul a!ryi ls~~~r~~tt>~ ~~ 4 .~ ~~ i { _ ~~ ~ ~~ 4 ' f ~' .a-. elii.']UVbhT~iNL'Su ~rdl { "..L" S r b i b It any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developerwill retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: 3 of 9 w - -. .. Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CP/BO C Review of report . A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage. Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report '°`/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal CP B Review of report A/D 4 fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: 4 of 9 w N • - -. .. • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of report A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify fhe monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for CP D Review of report D 3 documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho CP D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. ~~ ~,~ 3 7C= db~ogy~+bndx5otls, ~ °~ ~, ~~ - ; , ~ The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and construction RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,v emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction from the site during such episodes. 5 of 9 w -. .. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. .Flydr~lo§~anc_~_Wate~~QUalil~'~ ~~'~.r a~ ~i ~~~~ i.. .+._._ ~~~~ p l.~ ~~~~n ~v`._ ~.~~* L. V ,~: ~ - ~~ ~ ~ ~~~... n ~r,.-r . ~~J~ ulir L. .:_Sg ['3« ,~~ ' "y~~r~~# 42~' .~~`ar i~t'i~ 'S.1 Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or otf-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. During construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 cleaning will be pedormed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 6 of 9 w a .. . - ., .. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Fuscoe Engineering on July 3, 2006, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Landscaping plans shall include provisions for 80 B/C/D Review of plans A/C Z4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identity the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. k. > -r NO1SG~ l ` 't`~if'~f,~R '`•r~.~ s 'SG'~'xe3`.y'~r'` au 3~~f ~'9~~ 1~ ~Y ~, ~~n~ a .. .. ~ ... .r'_..~~w :...sa.' ~'.,.wia-~^.~~. ~_ ~~l.~r'.~t'.-. mac. ~' ; u~-4'"-, ~~.:..:E3 ~.. t x 'z ar~~ ,L~:+.. Y,d ~ ._ St ? ~ yv 'u.' tikh~ti`~ ..-..».. .. ...... .-- k ~ 9 "~ _ x..n.~~.?,~ ,.a ~~ 4 'WYE 2 N "~` ~k m7 ,.F, ._ ik . 3 n, , r ..,y ~ru o ,,z . ,_.:+~ ~ x Construct a 5-foot high barrier for Lots (Units) 7 through BO e/C Review of plans C 2/4 10 and lots (Units) 72 through 92 facing Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue. 7of9 w -. .. Construct a 5-foot high second floor balcony noise BO B/C Review of plans C 2l4 barrier for Lots (Units) 88 and 89 facing Foothill Boulevard. Provide a "windows closed" condition requiring a means BO B/C Review of plans C 2/4 of mechanical ventilation for all homes. Provide standard dual-glazed windows with a Sound BO B/C Review of plans C 2/4 Transmission Class (STC) rating of 26 or higher for all units and homes Tacing Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. To minimize the potential interior noise impacts, lots BO B/C Review of plans C 2/4 (units) facing Foothill Boulevard should be provided with weather-stripped solid core exterior doors, and exterior wall/roof assemblies should be free of cut outs and openings. Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Construction orgrading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A A as possible in the first phase. construction 8of9 w rn - - .: Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO C During A 4/7 hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used Tor hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Key to Checklist Abbreviations `~es~i3'n`si~lb ei'son,"fit ~ ~t~,-,~ ~~g =W ~~ -,,,,, p ,- _ " .x.v ..._,.. z ,, rte, r ; ~ ,s° rtt1"~ ~fMorittorthg,~~~~ie~ic~ . '~ ~ ..,cam _-.ti_v.u ........~..,.._ r ~* ~+a ~ st,t. u ~M~`~~b~ of V. i~5~toj ,~~~~'~""fir 'Lsa.F:~, za, ~'.,`_ .xn..~~~ _a=. _- : ,... >. ~~ , ~5a~iafi;aii -~^~. ~ .- ~ *- ,s:~a~4 ,.._..,.,.~ .....-.. £_.~~ss.z- ._F=.`. ,. CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -~ W ith Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B -Prior To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation 9 of 9 ~ V P398 ORDINANCE NO. 7SU AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2006-00350, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO MIXED USE FOR FOUR PARCELS COMPRISING OF APPROXIMATELY 1.04 ACRE OF LAND, LOCATEDAT RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, AND, ESTABLISH A MASTER PLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT FOR THE SIX PARCELS COMPRISING APPROXIMATELY 10.1 ACRES OF LAND AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND GROVE AVENUE ON THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP IN ACCORDANCE WITH MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 17.20.030; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 AND 45. A. Recitals. 1. Arbors at Route 66, LLC filed an application for Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On September 19, 2007, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on this application and concluded said hearing on that date; and on the application for General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223 and approved the associated General Plan Amendment. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: Section 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. Section 2: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on September 19, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 10.1 acres of land, basically an irregular quadrangle configuration, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue and is presently agriculturally and residentially developed. The residentially developed portion of said property subject to a Development District Amendment, the four parcels in the easterly 1.04 acre of the subject property, is currently designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling acres per unit) and is not within the Foothill Boulevard Districts Subarea 1; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with a golf course. The property to the west is designated Mixed Use and is within the Foothill Boulevard Districts Subarea 1. The property to the east is designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre). The property to the south is designated Mixed Use and is within the Foothill Boulevard Districts Subarea 1. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 07-xx DDA DRC2006-00350 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 19, 2007 Page 2 c. Portions of the City designated for Mixed Use can benefit from the application of a required Master Plan Overlay District with a carefully designed development; and d. This Development District Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and e. This Development District Amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and f. This Development District Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. g. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and h. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. Section 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the Development District Amendment is hereby amended to change the Development District Map in words and figures as shown in the Attached Exhibit A. Section 4: Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independentjudgmentsnd analysis of the City Council. Based on these findings, the City Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. P399 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 07-xii DDA DRC2006-00350 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 19, 2007 Page 3 c. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The City Council therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 401, 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. P400 • Schedule activities to minimize the .amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 07-ioi DDA DRC2006-00350 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 19, 2007 Page 4 Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. P401 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 07-zz DDA DRC2006-00350 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 19, 2007 Page 5 16) Use of Zero-VOC paints (assumes no more than 100 grams/liter of VOC) such as those listed by the SCAOMD of Super-Compliant Architectural Coating Manufacturers. Biological Resources 1) A Tree Removal Permit must be approved that provides for the replacement of the 12 on a 1:1 ratio basis with no fewer than two California Sycamores (Platanus Racemosa) placed in a prominent location in the project. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the 'San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: P402 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 07-zx DDA DRC2006-00350 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 19, 2007 Page 6 • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval ofearth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific P403 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 07-xz DDA DRC2006-00350 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 19, 2007 Page 7 measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Fuscoe Engineering on July 3, 2006, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. P404 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 07-roc DDA DRC2006-00350 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 19, 2007 Page 8 Noise Exterior.' 1) Construct a 5-foot high barrier for Lots (Units) 7 through 10 and Lots (Units) 72 through 92 facing Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue. 2) Construct a 5-foot high second floor balcony noise barrier for Lots (Units) 88 and 89 facing Foothill Boulevard. Interior: 3) Provide a "windows closed" condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation for all homes. 4) Provide standard dual-glazed windows with a Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 26 or higher for all units and homes facing Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. 5) To minimize the potential interior noise impacts, lots (units) facing Foothill Boulevard should be provided with weather-stripped solid core exterior doors, and exterior wall/roof assemblies should be free of cut outs and openings. 6) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 7) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 8) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. 9) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. P405 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 07-zz DDA DRC2006-00350 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 19, 2007 Page 9 Section 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. Section 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after it passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. P406 w N N N 0 LEGEND RESIDENTIAL LR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LMR LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL MR MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL MHR MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL :, COMMERCIAL OFFICE PUBLIC SC SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL MU MIXED USE U UTILITY CC COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL O OFFICE P PUBLIC RRG.REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL CO COMMERCIAUOFFICE __ MASTER PLAN AREA INDUSTRIAL LI LIGHT INDUSTRIAL LAND USE PLAN x A n O n O 0. m O~ ti V W Iv O A 0 V P408 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00341, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT18179 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project: 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will betaken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will betaken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 P409 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00341, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT18179 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the,City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2006-00223. DRC2006-00341. DRC2006-00350 DRC2007-00029 SUBTT18179 Applicant: Arbors at Route 66 LLC Initial Study Prepared by: Vance Pomeroy. Contract Planner Date: Mav 21.2007 •. ~. ~~~Q~uali~i ~ _ _~ ~ ; AII construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the CP/BO C Review of plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans A/C Z4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 401, 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering. 1 of 9 a 0 Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. 80 C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City it silt is carried over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with COnStrUCti0fl SCAOMD Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction suitable means. The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and construction Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM~o) emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans A/C 4 alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 2of9 ~ -. .. All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs BO C Review of plans A 4 requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate CP C Review of plans A/C 2/3 preferential parking for vanpools. All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of plans D 2/3 more employees shall be required to post bosh bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of plans D 2/3 more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C 2/4 required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C 2/4 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Use of Zero-VOC paints (assumes no more than 100 BO C/D Review of Plans C 2/4 grams/liter of VOC) such as those listed by the SCAOMD of Super-Compliant Architectural Coating Manufacturers. ^ c qR ~ rti t~' jqp d ~ ~~ ~~wl~~jJJ~ca l~s ~~ces~ ~` ~ ' ~ ~ ' ' d .... -. c C *E f' k . „y ~ ~ w~~ q y ~ , S7 _ o- ~K ~.~TM ,.. ~, L ~- tw :.^ .... . `µ ~ A Tree Removal Permit must be approved that provides CP B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 for the replacement of the 12 trees on a 1:1 ratio basis with no fewer than two California Sycamores (Platanus Racemosa) placed in a prominent location in the project. {:'s. ~ t R 'S~ "SF'~`S'1 "l. n.. ..+ PS f t~ ,3-'1'' au ~1h ~'+w~~. ri~"2 . ~~ ~ 3~ CUltl1~~~~e~eBS f -~*'~' * ~ t ar '. ``~+~a" t ~'' ` w x - ~ r ~ ' [:.^g - s $(1 '~ tx ryi ° cryg - "1 ., o i 4 & ~5 , y % ~,i ~ ~ _. ~, i , 8 ..~ .N.... G....» ..25.. .a..-. , i .i ra. ~'+' 4:~ _ ,Y=- A... '~t .c1. a ..mod -~ , k:.. ~. ."k'~'. . ,,. ~vY+iiG .03 ~~2,.n. v H ~ e . h ~ i ~ 'a,'. -h' ' &u I( any -prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: 3 of 9 ~ N • • • ~ • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage. Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEOA guidelines. Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal CP B Review of report A/D 4 fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: 4of9 ~ w -. .. Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of report A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BC B/C Review of report A/D 4 or graded, divert. earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for CP D Review of report D 3 documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho CP D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology bn7i Soils ~ A ~ , ~ ~^y' l'. _ K . 3.. " .a x.~1.r. S:cJ ~C _ _ I . W _ The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCA~MD and construction RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,oemissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions construction from the site during such episodes. 5of9 A A -. .. - Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. r' k kx""~u ?"x! a "'~" , , +d'- +3 u - ,fir t wr ~~Ydrolol~!~ar~c~~W~,~a~~~xQua~it~~~"~rds - ~, ~`l~t~M 5~ .vim-~t4 3 LL I. m "i~at Tr 'GJ '> y ~"~;~„ ~ i~ ~l 1 1 *" ,S`SS t ~y~':~k ~ .... 5 Po: '"~" , ~ r n ; ~~`h,, ,~ ~ N fi - -u I ~ ~`~ f a4 -4 ~.. f q '~r~` f ! I f ~^ r ;Fy ~I( F': Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C Z4 the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specity the iiming of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or oif-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. During construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 cleaning will be pertormed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 6of9 a - .. ... .. - The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Fuscoe Engineering on July 3, 2006, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B/C/D Review of plans A!C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C Z4 applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Slorm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Wasle Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the Cily Building Official for coverage underthe NPDES General Construction P e rmit. S ~~ K"~_'~ ' ~4 ~v3 'Y f^~5y}~y ! ~ ~rr~~k~ ~1 »,'ry*~e.~~~ cNO1Se ~~ ~,~ ~ y ^ ~ F k S' -~ x ~~i ~Y~~ {..1,~`~~ ~ 'r3 k~' 4' ~f f~''~~ ' A {.++~ ` ~ i~, ~ {f,}" ,[! ?t .~~~n u. " W' y I f >} tl. _ y:".Sa~ ~.f£. lu._w~"v.....z~~r.~._,.....w.a-~,~tK,.s?' "~a Sa s ~ W ?3 } .usc ~,.u`L. t ~K{8. _.YS} .l ~12 Construct a 5-fool high barrier for Lots (Units) 7 through BO e/C Review of plans C 2/4 10 and Lots (Units) 72 through 92 facing Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue. 7of9 a , rn . - -. .. Construct a 5-foot high second floor balcony noise BO B/C Review of plans C 2/4 barrier for Lots (Units) 88 and 89 facing Foothill Boulevard. Provide a "windows closed" condition requiring a means BO B/C Review of plans C 2/4 of mechanical ventilation for all homes. Provide standard dual-glazed windows with a Sound BO B/C Review of plans C 2/4 Transmission Class (STC) rating of 26 or higher for all units and homes facing Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. To minimize the potential interior noise impacts, lots BO B/C Review of plans C 2/4 (units) facing Foothill Boulevard should be provided with weather-stripped solid core exterior doors, and exterior wall/roof assemblies should b_e free of cut outs and openings. Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A A as possible in the first phase. construction 80(9 A V -. .. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO C During A 4/7 hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Key to Checklist Abbreviations y t urn i ~ ~ ~~n `~~~ `des oh5f~ild fj€fson, ~s ~r~ €.x ~+ ~ .,..a.: e:.~, «~s, ~c ~'.~_:..: ,.x,Yf.of;~_~_, i~~ CDD -Community Development Director or designee 1 ~ '~flflorl tbF~h F~~ ...~..: ._nr,,. .FC- A . W ilh Each New Development ;~" "~3t~o~` it oil o Y t ~ ° ~. a~. ~ ak ~ aec. ~ F A - On-sitelnspection ~ ~. '~~~ ryer~;~~r~ ~ -'S ~aircfio ~ ,~°s yr.:~+--a~...~.;.~°,t . ..'G .. 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B -Prior To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Repons/Studies/ Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation 9 of 9 ~ w P419 ORDINANCE NO. ~ p AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2007-00029, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE BEAR GULCH MIXED-USE AREA TABLE CONTAINED IN MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 17.32.020.0.3 TO EXPAND THE RANGE OF DEVELOPMENT IN THE RESIDENTIAL CLASSIFICATION TO 87 PERCENT AND TO ADD THE "MOST CASE" COLUMN FOUND IN THE CORRESPONDING GENERAL PLAN TABLE III-7, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. On June 27, 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced Development Code Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 07-37, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said Development Code Amendment. 2. On September 19, 2007, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Development Code Amendment. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on September 19, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The proposed Development Code Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan; and b. The proposed Development Code Amendment is confined to within the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and c. The application would promote the goals and policies found within the Development Code; and d. The subject Development Code Amendment identified in this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 21080.17 of the Public Resource Code and Section 15282(1) of Division 6 Title 14 of the California Code of Regulation. P420 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. XX DRC2007-00029 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC Page 2 SECTION 3: Municipal Code Section 17.32.020.0.3 is hereby amended to change information contained within the table thereunder in words and fgures, as shown in the attached Exhibit A. SECTION 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. P421 Exhibit A TABLE III-7 WESTERN FOOTHILL CORRIDOR -WESTERN GATEWAY y a ;,°, G ~-~~~r, , ,r u~n~a,~~ ~e,~~a,~, „FV~+~~~or n ,~# ;I"' +~` z+i"{, ~ ~ ~ ~, Acrea a Ran e~ m °~ , ~~ ~, ~ xy~ rH N r~Z„ ~,.~,~ ;ti,,~~.,a7.'t,'y ,; •~" 9 9 w ~+M'~~r;z 1~ y ~~ ~~ x ~ ~ ~ s ~ ' * ~ x ~ ~ v 'AZ~ .+~ 1 ~ F 1 ~'~ me ~' r 1hR~arvli is rr i Y !~ i~i:.ttr' + 1a!~a r ~' „~ }~ , , ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ s., 3, Estimated+~~~ ` a , , ' 6 ,~,~+~ rp'r ~+,t ~u-~1~!`. „ ! l Average Density F, t ~~ y „' ' f', ~ , ts~~n,V , ~ ~ ~ ~a > , i ~ " ' i „ tiry u~~ ,at , yu, ~ tr~l~3, pvo~,~a~,, ~ ~~,~ , ~ Most Case, ,f; ~e;~~',~n, ,r '„~ ~ :. . ~ ~ ~ ~ Percent ~~. 4 ~ , ,, i.'AAc dd'/acre ~ „ `~ ~~ ''`' ~ t r fr e Lmrgs ,; lr $i( '~; ,x, hY kY¢^t 1 a~ ~ i ~u ( a 1 ~'J C ~ ~ ' ~ )~} ~~~ ' ~ ' ~ ~ ' ~ gy ~ ( y+ ~ , e i 5 J f x M , F , Y y Y r ~ ,wl w.Y P W t„h ' m ~du/acre)r~ ,~.: ",, ~,~Ra r;Land Us ~' ~~ r ~~ 9 ~ i ~ n t ` Dwe ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ e G ~~ s ~ ll ng U i s; ; 3,r~ } ~ '' ~ ~` ~ •j~ v.r ~ . u r Commercial -retail, service 50% to 70% 27.5 to 38.5 acres 38.5 acres Commercial -tourist commercial; office commercial and rofessional Residential 30% to 87% 16.5 to 27.5 acres @ 16.5 acres (~ 14 dulacre' 14 dulacre 231 to 385 dwelling units 231 dwelling units TOTALS 100 percent 55 acres 55 acres Indicates target density not a range. Actual density may increase up to 20 du/acre as long as the total of 231 dwelling units is not exceeded. P422 RESOLUTION NO. 07-:22q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00341, THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. SUBTT18179, AND THE MASTER PLAN UNDER THE NEWLY ESTABLISHED MASTER PLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND GROVE AVENUE IN THE MIXED USE DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 AND 45. A. Recitals. 1. Arbors at Route 66, LLC filed an application for the Development Review of Tentative Tract SUBTT18179, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 27th day of June 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application at a duly noticed public hearing and approved the application as Resolution No. 07-39 at that meeting. 3. The decision and environmental assessment represented by said Planning Commission Resolution was appealed in a timely manner to this City Council. 4. On September 19, 2007, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above-referenced meeting on September 19, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, the minutes of the above-referenced Planning Commission meeting, and the contents of Planning Commission Resolution No. 07-39, and together with public testimony, this City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 10.1 acres of land, basically an irregular quadrangle configuration, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue and is presently agriculturally and residentially developed; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is a golf course, the property to the south consists of commercial shops, the property to the east is single-family residences, and the property to the west is commercial uses within the City of Upland; and c. The Master Plan is subject to the approval of a Master Plan Overlay District for the property; and P423 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-XX DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 2 d. The applicant has provided substantial technical evidence to support these conclusions. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this City Council hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows: That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. That the proposed development is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. That the proposed development is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. That the proposed development, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessmentfor the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared incompliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independentjudgmentavd analysis of the City Council. Based on these findings, the City Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The City Council therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-XX DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 3 upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby denies the appeal, upholds the action of the Planning Commission, and approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Deoartment 1) This application is subject to the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, and Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029 by the City Council and approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179 by the Planning Commission. 2) All conditions imposed on General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development DistrictAmendment DRC2006-00350 and Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029 by the City Council, and Development Review DRC2006-00341 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179 by the Planning Commission shall be conditions of approval for this resolution. 3) The applicant shall execute a covenant on the land in a form substantially similar to the Parking Declaration attached to the accompanying staff report in order to make the parking area of the office building available to the residents during off hours. 4) The applicant shall execute a covenant on the land in a form substantially similar to the use restrictions attached to the accompanying staff report in order to only allow uses in the live/work units that are compatible with the Master Plan. 5) The signage forthe office building shall incorporate a restrained use of off-lighting orhalo-lighting with minimal identification within the confines of the Foothill Boulevard Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. Sign review is a separate review process. 6) The lobby entry door and surrounding areas shall incorporate decorative security measures to be reviewed by the Planning Director for compatibility with the architectural design of the office building. 7) The applicant shall submit a request to Caltrans forthe installation of a protected left-turn signal for southbound Grove Avenue onto Foothill Boulevard and provide any warrant studies required by Caltrans. If approved by Caltrans, applicant shall provide for all improvements necessary for the protected left-turn signal. P424 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-XX DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 4 Encineerino Department 1) Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. Consider the O~oo runoff flow of 27.8 cfs entering the project site from the north indicated in the January 2006 Parsons-Brinkerhoff Drainage Study prepared for the City. 2) The easement on the property, in Rancho Cucamonga to the City of Upland, is to be quitclaimed by the developer. 3) Final Map shall show corner property line cutoff per City Standard Drawing No. 102, show joint access easements for Lots 1 and 2, and wall-only easement for entry monument. 4) Once Red Hill Country Club Drive is realigned the City will pursue the vacation of the existing Red Hill Country Club Drive along this development's frontage. This development shall install temporary frontage improvements along Red Hill Country Club Drive subject to City Engineer and Planning Director approval. Prior to recordation of the final map this development shall substantiate to the City Engineer's satisfaction that upon future vacation of Red Hill Country Club Drive this development will provide for removals and establishment of the new facilities along Red Hill Country Club Drive subject to City Engineer and Planning Director approval. 5) Provide a study necessary to determine if protected left-turn signals for north and southbound Grove Avenue onto Foothill Boulevard are warranted and install them subject to Caltrans approval, if necessary. 6) Foothill Boulevard improvements, including City entry monument and entry gateway at the Grove Avenue\Foothill Boulevard intersection, streetlights, patterned sidewalk with tree wells, etc. shall conform to the Visual Improvement Program for Foothill Boulevard and the Foothill Boulevard Districts guidelines outlined in the Development Code. 7) Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Major Divided Arterial Streets" standards. Install curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, sidewalk, streetlights, ADA access ramps, and street trees per City standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. a) Provide 27,000 and 16,000 lumen HPSV streetlights, in accordance with the Foothill Visual Improvement Plan. b) Provide dual ADA access ramps at the Grove Avenue\Foothill Boulevard intersection per City Standard Drawing No. 102. c) Protect existing street improvements. d) Provide or protect R26(s) "No Stopping" signs along the frontage e) Protect or replace traffic signal equipment. P425 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-XX DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 5 8) Grove Avenue frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Secondary Arterial Streets" standards. Install sidewalk, drive approach, streetlights, and street trees per City standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. a) An exception to the 50-foot maximum drive approach width (60 feet is being allowed for this project) is permitted although the drive approach shall comply with City Standard Drawing No. 101 in all other respects. b) Sidewalk shall be property-tine-adjacent and shall comply with City Standard Drawing No. 103, "With Non-Contiguous Sidewalk" example. For the drive approach on Grove Avenue, its intersection with the sidewalk shall comply with City Standard Drawing No. 101, "Non-Contiguous Sidewalk" example. c) Referring to the drive approach, City Standard Drawing No. 101 shows a "non-contiguous" (property-tine-adjacent) sidewalk crossing the driveway outside of the 90-degree curb return arc. Provide a sidewalk easement necessary for this on the final map. d) The gated driveway is to be in accordance with the City "Gated Entrance Design Guide", except that a 60-foot maximum drive approach width is permitted. e) Provide 9500 lumen HPSV streetlights. f) Protect existing street improvements. g) Provide or protect R26(s) "No Stopping" signs. 9) Red Hill Country Club Drive frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Local Streets" standards. Install curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, ADA access ramp at Foothill Boulevard, limited access curb at emergency driveway, streetlights, and street trees per City standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. a) Gated driveway shall be "Emergency Access Only". b) No "turf block" is allowed in the public right-of-way. c) Provide 5800 lumen HPSV streetlights. d) Protect existing street improvements. e) Provide or protect R26(s) "No Stopping" signs. 10) Coordinate the installation of Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements with the City project. 11) A contribution in-lieu of construction for the future median island in Foothill Boulevard shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever occurs first. The P426 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-XX DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 6 amount of the contribution shall be one-half the cost of the median times the length of the project frontage. 12) An in-lieu fee for one-half the cost of constructing special pavers within the Foothill Boulevard\Grove Avenue intersection shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee amount shall be based on the square footage of the intersection. 13) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the project side of Grove Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the south side of Foothill Boulevard to the first pole off site north of the north project boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing Grove Ave. shall be undergrounded at the same time. Since the west side of Grove Avenue is in the City of Upland, reimbursement is not an option. 14) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the project side of Red Hill Country Club Drive shall be undergrounded, .prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing Red Hill Country Club Drive shall be undergrounded at the same time. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 15) Manholes shall be provided wherever public storm drain systems end and private systems begin. Provide appropriate easements wherever public storm drains cross private property and obtain an encroachment agreement to place private facilities within public rights-of-way. 16) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of the curb to one foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages. 17) Driveway accent paving shall be located outside the public right of way. 18) Public improvement plans shall be 90 percent complete prior to the issuance of grading permits. Public improvement plans shall be 100 percent complete, signed by the City Engineer, and an improvement agreement and bonds executed bythe developer, priorto building permit issuance. 19) Complete the submitted Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP) per the requirements of the City Engineer including, but not limited to, showing the Best Management Practices (BMPs) on grading plans, and signing and recording the Memorandum of Agreement. P427 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-XX DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 7 Environmental Mitigation Air Qualify 1) All construction equipment shalt be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South CoastAir Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall complywith SCAQMD Rules401, 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. P428 • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-XX DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 8 Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 16) Use of Zero-VOC paints (assumes no more than 100 grams/liter of VOC) such as those listed by the SCAQMD of Super-Compliant Architectural Coating Manufacturers. Biological Resources 1) A Tree Removal Permit must be approved that provides for the replacement of the 12 on a 1:1 ratio basis with no fewer than two California Sycamores (Platanus Racemosa) placed in a prominent location in the project. P429 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-XX DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 9 Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within newdevelopments, using theirspecial qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval ofearth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. P430 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-XX DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 10 Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,p emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. P431 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-XX DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 11 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational: 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Fuscoe Engineering on July 3, 2006, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise Exterior: 1) Construct a 5-foot high barrier for Lots (Units) 7 through 10 and Lots (Units) 72 through 92 facing Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue. P432 2) Construct a 5-foot high second floor balcony noise barrier for Lots (Units) 88 and 89 facing Foothill Boulevard. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-XX DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 12 Interior.• 3) Provide a "windows closed" condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation for all homes. 4) Provide standard dual-glazed windows with a Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 26 or higherfor all units and homes facing Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. 5) To minimize the potential interior noise impacts, lots (units) facing Foothill Boulevard should be provided with weather-stripped solid core exterior doors, and exterior wall/roof assemblies should be free of cut outs and openings. 6) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 7) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 8) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. 9) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. This City Council hereby provides notice to Mr. Rex Gutierrez, the appellant, and Arbors at Route 66 LLC, the applicant, that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of the California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. P433 7. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return-receipt requested, to Arbors at Route 66 LLC at the address identified in City records. P434 Project File No.: DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00341, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT18179 This Mitigation Monitoring_Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project: A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will betaken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 P435 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00341, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT18179 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specifid phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. Unanticipated circumstandes may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2006-00223. DRC2006-00341. DRC2006-00350. DRC2007-00029 SUB7T18179 Applicant: Arbors at Route 66 LLC Initial Study Prepared by: Vance Pomerov. Contract Planner Date: Mav 21.2007 -. - .. -. x y All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans A/C Z4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the CP/BO C Review of plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of plans A/C Z4 Rules 401, 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering. 1 of 9 ~ w rn . . . . . . .. . . Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans A/C . 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs-as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction SCAOMD Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction suitable means. The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and construction Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM~o) emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inaciive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans A/C 4 alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 2of9 ~ w V -. .. All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs BO C Review of plans A 4 requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate CP C Review of plans A/C 2/3 preferential parking for vanpools. All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of plans D 213 more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of plans D 2/3 more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C 2/4 required to incorporate high-etiiciency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C Z/4 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Use of Zero-VOC paints (assumes no more than 100 BO C/D Review of Plans C 2/4 grams/liter of VOC) such as those listed by the SCAOMD of Super-Compliant Architectural Coating Manufacturers. bi ~ f ~4'. h S v r YP Y"n~ .." r ~ j6`i~ibglb~~i~`esa'u~bes rrt, y~~~ ~~ " ' " `*5. ^ - - ~ qj- - ~~~ ~ Y li ~~ ~ ~ '#''.~~ y~" ~_ ~ 7xu -_,.....a.-~-.x n.~..~.. vm, ~.t~ ~.. sm...X~T ...~ . , ~ rrr~ . .. v . F .. ~ ~ .. y:r ..>. A Tree Removal Permit must be approved that provides CP B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 for the replacement of the 12 trees on a 1:1 ratio basis with no fewer than two California Sycamores (Platanus Racemosa) placed in a prominent location in the project. ~ LGH T of%i Rn .~~ o I ill b.~ A j~634R 4. 2«$fr ~ !! x ~Cultu f-1@sbwr~Ces4' ~ '~ :~~~~~ 3K'3 S~'y 3s¥~. ~ ~~~~°''°hh-mss , vN e? l~^ ''.~'^y( 'N"1+" 4:• o µ1'n E d,~ '~ `~ ~"G'-{[ ~ ~ d 'c , • If any -prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developerwill retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to lake appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: 3of9 ~ w 00 ..- - Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CP/BO C Review of report A!D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. _ Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage. Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the. San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal CP B Review of report A/D 4 fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: 4 of 9 a to ca . - -. - .. Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of report A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identity, and curate all recovered fossils for CP D Review of report D 3 documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho CP D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. R/['f1 i~ lL] ° ~{yet ~Ly~~' ~3 "Akk 'T rr ~~ Y# ~~e~l'~g~`~and~5~~s ifF~:1-F~i~1`~~~s~ST ~5`~(~(~~~~TJO y ~S _ _"3Y.~'+ .'Y' L-. `if ..,I,.:.1 r.i~ v " ! i ~nr{"p'+~H ~~ 4~.~f. s ~-e..ee it `° P ~ FiA ~vL L ..1'. 4.L~:~x W %5 1 .. -:x 1r (.du , y _ ~, .t ~I `D f ~ +'rt`~b.~~y1T~ ~ ^.alt.~.r sS~ E'~ R41 k>' It~jPl ~ `~. The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and construction RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,oemissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction from the site during such episodes. -o 5 of 9 a 0 • - -. .. - Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. rt°rt p a~W' !j , x7 ]y v y F4 S FHydrolog~arSd Wa~eT,Qualdy~ '~s^sYry ,a js a ~ ~~, ~ .h^~ a~°€-~'~i~~~`~ ~'+"F ;f '~' ~~' ~'~ ~~?y'~ ` ~z~€°` r~ i ~A Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant 80 B/C/D Review of plans A/C Z4 shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in 80 B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. During construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 cleaning will be pertormed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 6of9 ~ A .. - .. - -. .: The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 the Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP) prepared by Fuscoe Engineering on July 3, 2006, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WOMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall identity the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant ' Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permi[ from [he State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. ~ m. ~, r, r M1~ , ~ a ~ a ~~Vois~~ ''~;~wlna`~i(ti~~~~~k~ ~'°~s~~~~'~~+~~~r~~ ' ~ ter. .~ .;~~ ~ ~ ~a ~,~~ t~°. a~.;~~~~ ~ #~~_ ~ = ba' ~ ~~- '~ ~ ~;~ m ~~~~~ ,) n~ ~~s•~ r ° ,t, y,r=t~N rt . rU:a-v f~Y .w. ~. ., d '~,..~. uk ,k~ wh. ~ ~ ~ Construct a 5-foot high barrier for Lots (Units) 7 through BO B/C Review of plans C 2/4 10 and Lots (Units) 72 through 92 facing Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue. 7of9 a A N . - -. - .. Construct a 5-foot high second floor balcony noise BO B/C Review of plans C 2/4 barrier for Lots (Units) 88 and 89 facing Foothill ' Boulevard. Provide a "windows closed" condition requiring a means BO B/C Review of plans C 2/4 of mechanical ventilation for all homes. Provide standard dual-glazed windows with a Sound BO B/C Review of plans C 2/4 Transmission Class (STC) rating of 26 or higher Tor all units and homes Lacing Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. To minimize the potential interior noise impacts, lots BO B/C Review of plans C 2/4 (units) facing Foothill Boulevard should be provided with weather-stripped solid core exterior doors, and exterior wall/roof assemblies should be free of cut outs and openings.- Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A A as possible in the first phase. construction 8 of 9 ~ a w -. .. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO C During A 4!7 hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, iF heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Key to Checklist Abbreviations ~~y*'~~`~G x sr „' f 'i ty+-..t '#' i~es~ohsttite~F?ePsanr ~.i -+-~3" , -->~ _t Y v > i" 4 "::Z' i~ x'~'rr'r ~FJ~_dhrtoringspegUe~~c~'~t.~;~~~"~ ~ r' u ,+r h ~. "C `#' ''~ iN~flr~6d~o1'V~Yt~'igCht_~~irY°;'~.~'~"#'~~~r .m [5 ,v 4 .~- 7'C ~ `~ '¢~= "~aHcEtdhs,' ~~~ ~ ~- CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1~W ithhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B -Prior To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP - ~ 7 -Citation 9 of 9 ~ a A P445 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00341 SUBJECT: MASTERPLAN FORA 10.1 ACRE PROJECT SITE APPLICANT: ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND GROVE AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Approval of Development Review DRC2006-00341 is granted subject to the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223 Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350 Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, and Tentative Tract SUBTT18179. 3. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 07-39, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will conf rm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Notice of Determination - $50 b) Negative Declaration - $ 1,850 Completion Date / / / / / / I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMMt2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00347StdConds 6-27.doc Proiect No. DRCZOOS-ooP446 Completion Date B. Time Limits 1. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning _/_/_ Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval. 2. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if _/_/_ building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_I_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Foothill Boulevard Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _I_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable Ciry Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specifc Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved _/_/_ by the Planning Director and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with _/_/_ all receptacles shielded from public view. 9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and _/_I_ the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 11. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination. I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00341 StdConds 6-27.doc Project No. DRC2006-OOP4Q] Completion Date D. 12. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the _/_/_ Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 13. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 14. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all _/_/_ lots for Planning Director and City Engineer approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 15. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall _/_/_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter. 16. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), ratherthan _I_/_ wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 17. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood _/_I_ gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 18. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. _/_/_ Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/_I_ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided _/_/_ throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, _/_/_ and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth _/_/_ from back of sidewalk. 5. Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/_/_ parking stalls. Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent. The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet. I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res 8 St( Rpt\DRC2006-00347 StdConds 6-27.doc Proieot No. DRCZOOS-oo.p448 Comoletion Date E. F Trip Reduction 1. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily residential projects of more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the f rst 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. 2. Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and other non-residential development. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. 3. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 4. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 5. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 6. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 7. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 8. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department. 4 / I ~ I I / / I / / / I / I / / I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res 8 Stt Rpt\DRC2006-00341 StdConds 6-27.doc Projeot No. DRCZOOS-ooP449 9. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, me. sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Improvement Plan. 10. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 11. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department. 12. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. G. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. H. Environmental Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on-and off-site. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to final occupancy release. The final report shall also make recommendations as toadditional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA. 2. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 3. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) General Requirements Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; Completion Date / / / I / I / I / / / / / I / / I / I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMMt2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00341StdConds 6-27.doc Project No. DRC2006-OOP45Q Comoletion Date c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (DRC2006-00341) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. J. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (DRC2006-00341). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautifcation Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public counter). 6. Submit pool plans to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department for approval. K. New Structures Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fre-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. I / / / -/-- / / I / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00341 StdConds 6-27.doc Project No. DRCZOOS-ooP451 Comoletion Date 4. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC _I_!_ Section 1505. 5. Provide draft stops in attics in line with common walls. _/_/_ 6. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 7. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. _/_/_ 8. If the area of habitable space above the first floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the _I_/_ construction type shall be V-1 Hour minimum. 9. Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be not less than 1-hour _/_/_ fire-resistive construction. L. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _I_/_ perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_I_ time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for _/_/_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. M. Additional Requirements/Comments 1. The project shall fully comply with accessibility requirements of 2001 California Building Code _/_/_ Chapter 11A (Housing Accessibility) APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, _/_I_ community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from _/_/_ street centerline): 60 total feet on Foothill Boulevard -/-/- 44 total feet on Grove Avenue -/-/- I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00341SldConds 6-27.doc Project No. DRCZOOS-oo:p452 Completion Date 3. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 4. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CCBRs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved. 5. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. 6. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map. 7. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. O Street Improvements 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development. 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: ' Street Name Curb 8 Gutter A.C. Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Foothill Boulevard X X (c) X X (d) Grove Avenue X X X X Red Hill Country Club Drive X X X X X Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs f rst. 8 / / I I / / / / / / / I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00341SldConds 6-27.doc Project No. DRCZOOS-oo:p453 Comoletion Date 5. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a _/_/_ construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and _/_/_ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction _I_I_ project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffc signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City _/_/_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _I_I_ adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be _/_I_ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan _/_I_ check. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in _/_/_ acc ordance with the City's street tree program. I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00341 StdConds 6-27.doc Project No. DRCZOOS-oo:p454 Comolefion Date 6. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. MIn. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Slze Dry. Foothill Boulevard Non-Activity Centers - Prunus Blireiana NCN 3 ft. 20 ft. o.c. - 15-gal. Fill-in Accent Tree Informal groupings not more than 25% of total frontage trees Non-Activity Centers Platanus racemosa Calrfomia Sycamore 8 ft. 35 ft. o.c. - 15-gal. Informal groupings Non-Activity Centers Platanus acerifolia London Plane Tree 30 ft. o.c: 15-gal. Informal rou in s Tree Wells Lagerstroemia Pink Crape Myrtle 3 ft. Per tree well 24-inch indica"Tuscarora" design box Grove Avenue Hymenosprorum Sweetshade 5 ft. 20 ft. o.c. 15-gal. flavum Red Hill CC Drive N/o Foothill Boulevard Platanus acerifolia London Plane Tree 8 ft. 30 ft. 15-gal. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfll soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. P Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to f nal map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 2. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan Foothill Boulevard. 10 / / I / / / / / I:\PLANNINGIFINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00341 StdConds 6-27.doc Proiect No. DRCZOOS-oop455 Completion Date Q. Drainage and Flood Control 1. The project (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 2. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone AO designation removed from the project area. The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain an unshaded "X" designation. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. 3. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 4. A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way. 5. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. R. Utilities 1. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary 2. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. S. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED 11 I / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / I / I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2n07 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00341StdConds 6-27.doc P456 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District „M Nn I "~ -~ Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS August 16, 2006 Arbors at Route 66 Charles Joseph & Associates 8212 Red Hill County Club Drive Mixed Use Subdivision SUBTT18179 & DRC2006-00341 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at http://www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us/fire/index.htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section. Search by article; the preceding number' of the standard refers to the article. Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial projects is 300 feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150 feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100 feet. b. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in multi-family residential projects is 400 feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 200 feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150 feet. c. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential projects is 500 feet. No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250 feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200 feet. For single-family residential projects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area, the maximum distance between fire hydrants is 400 feet. No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 200 feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150 feet. e. Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: P457 At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways. ii. At intersections. iii. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. iv. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. v. A minimum of forty feet (40') from any building. If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150 feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route arouhd the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1,000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project is 1,500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch.. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. The required minimum fire flow for this project, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 1500gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 or 13R with central station monitoring. This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 3. The required minimum fire flow for structures located in the designated hazardous fire area shall be not less than 1,750 gpm at 20-psi residual. For structures in excess of 36,000 square feet use CFC Table A-III-A-1. 4. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 5. Firewater plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 6. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600 feet of the proposed project site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. P458 FSC-4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in: 1. Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet. 2. Group "A" Occupancies. 3. "E" Occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more persons. 4. Multi-family residential structures in excess of 4 units. 5. All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (see Fire Access). 6. When required fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure. 7. When the building access does not meet the requirements of the 2001 California Building Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard #9-7. 8. When any applicable code or standard requires the structure to be sprinklered. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System 1. RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or standards) requires an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system. Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Building Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 ahd/or the California Fire Code. 2. Prior to installation of the building fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' plan dheck approval and a building permit must be obtained. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access - Fire Lanes Standard #9-7. 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures 1st -story exterior wall shall be located within 150 feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26 feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24 feet. c. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50 feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45 feet. P459 e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12 percent. i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up. Vegetation shalt not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways: Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows: a. In buildings withdut high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings: 4. Access Walkways: Fiardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. Commercialflndustrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2. The following design requirements apply: a. The gate shall be motorized and slide open horizontally or swing inward. b. ~ All gates must open at the rate of one second for each one-foot of required width. c. When fully open, the minimum width shall be 20 feet. d. Gates are not required to be motorized. 6. Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1. The following design requirements apply: a. All automatic gates shall be provided with a Fire District approved, compatible traffic pre-emption device. The devices shall be digital. Analog devices are not acceptable. Devices shall be installed' in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and specifications. b. Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch. c. The key switch shall be located outside and immediately adjacent to the gate for use in the event that the traffic pre-emption device fails to operate. d. A traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. e. The gate shall remain in the open position for not less than 20 minutes and shall automatically reset. 4 P460 7. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 8. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. 9. Roof Access: There shall be a means of fire department access•from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75 feet above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder. b. A minimum of. one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard 9-9 Appendix A and drawings 9-9a and 9-9b. h. A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire District vehicle access and water supply from a public or private water main system before construction. FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspectiori is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • Magnesium Working • Application of Flammable Finishes • Candles and open flames in assemblies • Compressed Gases • Public Assembly • Dry Cleaning Plants • Flammable and Combustible Liquids • Hazardous Materials public Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • Liquefied Petroleum Gases • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings 5 P461 FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards. Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance. The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1: If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. California Government Code, Section 65850.2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure requirements. A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility. 2. Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is required to submit a Plan, is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions. The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner. FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this project. The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided. The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office. Reciprocal access agreement -Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and a ndn-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the.property by the fire District. P462 Reciprocal water covenant -Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general). The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2.. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CVWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project.- Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard # 9-8. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CVWD. personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CVWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Fuel Modification Plans: Please refer to RCFPD Summary of Fire Hazardous Area requirements. 4. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14 feet 6 inches above the finished surface of the road. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CVWD must be received. The applicarit is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. P463 6. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant,location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. . 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. P464 9. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. 10. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi- family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness. When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance. Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial and industrial buildings. The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites. 11. Hazardous Materials: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division. The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 12. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 13. Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 ~/z-inch by 11-inch or 11-inch by 17-inch site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. P465 RESOLUTION NO. 07-23D A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18179, A SUBDIVISION OF 10.1 ACRES OF LAND INTO TWO LOTS FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES IN THE MIXED USE DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND GROVE AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 AND 45. A. Recitals. 1. Arbors at Route 66, LLC filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 27th day of June 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga considered the application at a duly noticed public hearing and approved the application as Resolution No. 07-38 at that meeting. 3. The decision and environmental assessment represented by said Planning Commission Resolution was appealed in a timely manner to this City Council. 4. On September 19, 2007, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above-referenced meeting on September 19, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, the minutes of the above-referenced Planning Commission meeting, and the contents of Planning Commission Resolution No. 07-38, and together with public testimony, this City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 10.1 acres of land, basically an irregular quadrangle configuration, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue and is presently agriculturally and residentially developed; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is a golf course, the property to the south consists of commercial shops, the property to the east is single-family residences, and the property to the west is commercial uses with the City of Upland; and P466 c. The application provides more parking than required; and d. The applicant has provided substantial technical evidence to support these conclusions. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this City Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and c. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and d. The Tentative Tract Map is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and e. The design of the Tentative Tract Map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessmentfor the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice ofthe public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared incompliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independentjudgment and analysis of the City Council. Based on these findings, the City Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The City Council therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho P467 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-xx SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 3 Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby denies the appeal, upholds the action of the Planning Commission, and approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) This application is subject to the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350 and Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029 by the City Council and approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179 and Development Review DRC2006-00341 by the Planning Commission. 2) All conditions imposed on General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350 and Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029 by the City Council and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179 and Development Review DRC2006-00341 by the Planning Commission shall be conditions of approval for this resolution. 3) The applicant shall execute a covenant on the land in a form substantially similar to the parking declaration attached to the accompanying staff report in order to make the parking area of the office building available to the residents during off hours. 4) The applicant shall execute a covenant on the land in a form substantially similar to the use restrictions attached to the accompanying staff report in order to only allow uses in the live/work units that are compatible with the Master Plan. 5) The signage for the office building shall incorporate a restrained use of off-lighting orhalo-lighting with minimal identification within the confines of the Foothill Boulevard Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. Sign review is a separate review process. 6) The lobby entry door and surrounding areas shall incorporate decorative security measures to be reviewed by the Planning Director for compatibility with the architectural design of the office building. 7) The applicant shall submit a request to Caltrans for the installation of a protected left-turn signal for southbound Grove Avenue onto Foothill Boulevard and provide any warrant studies required by Caltrans. If approved by Caltrans, applicant shall provide for all improvements necessary for the protected left-turn signal. P468 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-xx SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 4 Engineering Department 1) Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. Consider the O,oo runoff flow of 27.8 cfs entering the project site from the north indicated in the January 2006 Parsons-Brinkerhoff Drainage Study prepared for the City. 2) The easement on the property, in Rancho Cucamonga to the City of Upland, is to be quitclaimed by the developer. 3) Final Map shall show corner property line cutoff per City Standard Drawing No. 102, show joint access easements for Lots 1 and 2, and wall-only easement for entry monument. 4) Once Red Hill Country Club Drive is realigned the City will pursue the vacation of the existing Red Hill Country Club Drive along this development's frontage. This development shall install temporary frontage improvements along Red Hill Country Club Drive subject to City Engineer and Planning Director approval. Prior to recordation of the fnal map this development shall substantiate to the City Engineer's satisfaction that upon future vacation of Red Hill Country Club Drive, this development will provide for removals and establishment of the new facilities along Red Hill Country Club Drive subject to City Engineer and Planning Director approval. 5) Provide a study necessary to determine if protected left-turn signals for north and southbound Grove Avenue onto Foothill Boulevard are warranted and install them subject to Caltrans approval, if necessary. 6) Foothill Boulevard improvements, including City entry monument and entry gateway at the Grove Avenue\Foothill Boulevard intersection, streetlights, patterned sidewalk with tree wells, etc. shall conform to the Visual Improvement Program for Foothill Boulevard and the Foothill Boulevard Districts guidelines outlined in the Development Code. 7) Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Major Divided Arterial Streets" standards. Install curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, sidewalk, streetlights, ADA access ramps, and street trees per City standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. a) Provide 27,000 and 16,000 lumen HPSV streetlights, in accordance with the Foothill Visual Improvement Plan. b) Provide dual ADA access ramps at the Grove Avenue\Foothill Boulevard intersection per City Standard Drawing No. 102. c) Protect existing street improvements. d) Provide or protect R26(s) "No Stopping" signs along the frontage. P469 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-xx SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 5 e) Protect or replace traffic signal equipment 8) Grove Avenue frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Secondary Arterial Streets" standards. Install sidewalk, drive approach, streetlights, and street trees per City standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. a) An exception to the 50-foot maximum drive approach width (60 feet is being allowed for this project) is permitted although the drive approach shall comply with City Standard Drawing No. 101 in all other respects. b) Sidewalk shall be property-tine-adjacent and shall comply with City Standard Drawing No. 103, "With Non-Contiguous Sidewalk" example. For the drive approach on Grove Avenue, its intersection with the sidewalk shall comply with City Standard Drawing No. 101, "Non-Contiguous Sidewalk" example. c) Referring to the drive approach, City Standard Drawing No. 101 shows a "non-contiguous" (property-tine-adjacent) sidewalk crossing the driveway outside of the 90-degree curb return arc. Provide a sidewalk easement necessary for this on the final map. d) The gated driveway is to be in accordance with the City "Gated Entrance Design Guide", except that a 60-foot maximum drive approach width is permitted. e) Provide 9500 lumen HPSV streetlights. f) Protect existing street improvements. g) Provide or protect R26(s) "No Stopping" signs. 9) Red Hill Country Club Drive frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Local Streets" standards. Install curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, ADA access ramp at Foothill Boulevard, limited access curb at emergency driveway, streetlights, and street trees per City standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. a) Gated driveway shall be "Emergency Access Only." b) No "turf block" is allowed in the public right-of-way. c) Provide 5800 lumen HPSV streetlights. d) Protect existing street improvements. e) Provide or protect R26(s) "No Stopping" signs. P470 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-xx SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 6 10) Coordinate the installation of Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements with the City project. 11) A contribution in-lieu of construction for the future median island in Foothill Boulevard shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever occurs first. The amount of the contribution shall be one-half the cost of the median times the length of the project frontage. 12) An in-lieu fee for one-half the cost of constructing special pavers within the Foothill Boulevard\Grove Avenue intersection shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee amount shall be based on the square footage of the intersection. 13) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the project side of Grove Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the south side of Foothill Boulevard to the first pole off site north of the north project boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing Grove Avenue shall be undergrounded at the same time. Since the west side of Grove Avenue is in the City of Upland, reimbursement is not an option. 14) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the project side of Red Hill Country Club Drive shall be undergrounded, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing Red Hill Country Club Drive shall be undergrounded at the same time. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 15) Manholes shall be provided wherever public storm drain systems end and private systems begin. Provide appropriate easements wherever public storm drains cross private property and obtain an encroachment agreement to place private facilities within public rights-of-way. 16) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of the curb to one foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages. 17) Driveway accent paving shall be located outside the public right of way P471 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-xx SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 7 18) Public improvement plans shall be 90 percent complete prior to the issuance of grading permits. Public improvement plans shall be 100 percent complete, signed by the City Engineer, and an improvement agreement and bonds executed by the developer, prior to building permit issuance. 19) Complete the submitted Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) per the requirements of the City Engineer including, but not limited to, showing the Best Management Practices (BMPs) on grading plans, and signing and recording the Memorandum of Agreement. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South CoastAir Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 401, 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. P472 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-xx SUBTT18179 - ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 8 • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM~o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. P473 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-xx SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 9 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 16) Use of Zero-VOC paints (assumes no more than 100 grams/liter of VOC) such as those listed by the SCAOMD of Super-Compliant Architectural Coating Manufacturers. Biological Resources 1) A Tree Removal Permit must be approved that provides for the replacement of the 12 on a 1:1 ratio basis with no fewer than two California Sycamores (Platanus Racemosa) placed in a prominent location in the project. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within newdevelopments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a P474 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-xx SUBTT18179 - ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 10 qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. P475 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-xx SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 11 Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational: 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Fuscoe Engineering on July 3, 2006, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. P476 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-xx SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 12 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise Exterior: 1) Construct a 5-foot high barrier for Lots (Units) 7 through 10 and Lots (Units) 72 through 92 facing Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue. 2) Construct a 5-foot high second floor balcony noise barrier for Lots (Units) 88 and 89 facing Foothill Boulevard. Interior: 3) Provide a "windows closed" condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation for all homes. 4) Provide standard dual-glazed windows with a Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 26 or higherfor all units and homes facing Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. 5) To minimize the potential interior noise impacts, lots (units) facing Foothill Boulevard should be provided with weather-stripped solid core exterior doors, and exterior wall/roof assemblies should be free of cut outs and openings. 6) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 7) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the P477 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-xx SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 13 Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 8) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. 9) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. This City Council hereby provides notice to Mr. Rex Gutierrez, the appellant, and Arbors at Route 66 LLC, the applicant, that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of the California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 7. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return-receipt requested, to Arbors at Route 66 LLC at the address identified in City records. P478 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00341, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SU BTT 18179 This Mitigation Monitoring_Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project: 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will betaken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will betaken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 P479 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00341, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT18179 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00341, DRC2006-00350. DRC2007-00029. SUBTf18179 Applicant: Arbors at Route 66 LLC Initial Study Prepared by: Vance Pomeroy, Contract Planner Date: May 21, 2007 .. .. - . . . . . . . .. . . . ~~~ ;'AirOualdy". '~r~` ~~'~~~t ~"`'",~ ~ ' ' ' ~ ~ ~~~$'~'~ z ~ . <.. __~.. __. ,.:.. ~ ~ b .~._ ,,_ ( t, ~ 4 µ y All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the CP/BO C Review of plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 401, 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering. 1 of 9 ~ w 0 . - -. .. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans A/C 2!4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction suitable means. The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and construction Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,a emissions. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans A/C 4 alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 2 of 9 ~ 00 .. ... -. .. All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs BO C Review of plans A 4 requiring that trucks shall not be left idling far prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate CP C Review of plans A/C 2/3 preferential parking for vanpools. All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of plans D Z3 more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of plans D Z3 more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C 2/4 required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C Z4 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Use of Zero-VOC paints (assumes no more than 100 BO C/D Review of Plans C Z4 grams/liter of VOC) such as those listed by the SCAOMD of Super-Compliant Architectural Coating Manufacturers. .. _ ..y, ~ 'V FS~.E 3 '> ~ !.,'t ical Resources- Biolo '- ~ ~ } i s` i ~"Y.° yw~~ ~~~ '~ , - ~ & '34'- -. ~~kJf'~'t>> t .~ t~ ~~~ k ~~ ~" ~ ~y ~ ~ ! ~ ~ tE 't' .t1' ~rti ~~ ~`~- arJ4`e*°#~~ t~ 1'p ? IS 1 • g s ~, . : • ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ k~' -tix_e ~ ~ : ; & _ , n s A Tree Removal Permit must be approved that provides CP B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 for the replacement of the 12 trees on a 1:1 ratio basis with no fewer than two California Sycamores (Platanus Racemosa) placed in a prominent location in the project. ,_ ' Cultural Resources j~ ~ 4 ,' -€ ' , ~ , ~ - ~;~°'`'i< , - _ _ .. _ r.. -. _. _ ~ . ., .._ _ If any -prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: 3 of 9 ~ 00 N - .. Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. ' • Consider establishing provisions to require CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal CP B Review of report A/D 4 fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) chat may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: 4 of 9 a w .. .. -. . . . . . . . . .. . . Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of report A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BC BBC Review of report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for CP D Review of report D 3 documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho CP D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. =Geology and'Soils~~~,'~~~~~~. '~~ '~`~ t o-~~~ "- ~~ , r ~ - ` ~~'~~;~ ._., . , • ~ u 4,~ _ The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and construction RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction from the site during such episodes. 5 of 9 ~ ao a . - -. .. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. ~~ :. ,Hydrology and. WateP_Quality ' ~ r_ _ _ ~.. ~ - ,, -_ ~ ~ ;; € , atc -. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. During construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there - is rainfall or other runoff. During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 cleaning will be pertormed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 6 of 9 a 00 .. -. .. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 the Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP) prepared by Fuscoe Engineering on July 3, 2006, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WOMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. ., .. . '. , ~~ F t ~:~~ ~ r ,t+" : " Ea ,r .' ~ Noise t ..,. 4 v "3`ir i y. , ~' ~_ ~ ~ #y-:~ i"~! ~ F ;, o x :;... ~., ' n •~. w "' . . ..a.. Construct a 5-foot high barrier for Lots (Units) 7 through BO e/C Review of plans C 2/4 10 and Lots (Units) 72 through 92 facing Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue. 7 of 9 a 00 rn - -. .. Construct a 5-foot high second floor balcony noise BO B/C Review of plans C 2/4 barrier for Lots (Units) 88 and 89 facing Foothill Boulevard. Provide a "windows closed" condition requiring a means BO B/C Review of plans C 2/4 of mechanical ventilation for all homes. Provide standard dual-glazed windows with a Sound BO B/C Review of plans C 2/4 Transmission Class (STC) rating of 26 or higher for all units and homes facing Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. To minimize the potential interior noise impacts, lots BO B/C Review of plans C 2/4 (units) facing Foothill Boulevard should be provided with weather-stripped solid core exterior doors, and exterior wall/roof assemblies should be free of cut outs and openings. Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, it noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A A as possible in the first phase. construction 8 of 9 ~ V .. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO C During A 4/7 hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Key to Checklist Abbreviations 1. ~ .fdesponsiblb.Person, Kr +, `._ ' tl 7 a"inl ~ 'rMonttoi:ing~F.rec~tiencyr I ' k a;# R.i v Methodrof Uenftdation,• ~,~,~ ~` )~ t'~ 1 e '., ~San~ttons' 3 ~ '~ +~ :~;.; CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Prior To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds FC -Fire Chief ar designee 6 -Revoke CUP ' 7 -Citation 9of9 a 00 00 P489 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18179 SUBJECT: SUBDIVISION OF 10.1 ACRES INTO TWO LOTS APPLICANT: ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND GROVE AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Approval of Tentative Tract No. SUBTT18179 is granted subject to the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350 Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, and Development Review DRC2006-00341. 3. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 07-38, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Notice of Determination - $50 b) Negative Declaration - $ 1,850 Completion Date -/-/- -/-/ -/-/- I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18779StdCOnd 6-27.doc Project No. susmeP490 Completion Date B. Time Limits 1. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning _/_/_ Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval. 2. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if _/_/_ building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Foothill Boulevard Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved _/_/_ by the Planning Director and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with _/_/_ all receptacles shielded from public view. 9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and _/_/_ the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 11. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination. I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT78179SIdCond 6-27.dac Project No. suBrr1ep491 Completion Date D. 12. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the _/_/_ Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 13. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 14. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all _/_/_ lots for Planning Director and City Engineer approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 15. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall _/_/_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter. 16. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than _1_/_ wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 17. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood _/_/_ gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 18. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. _/_/_ Par king and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/_/_ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided _/_/_ throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, _/_/_ and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth _/_/_ from back of sidewalk. 5. Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/_/_ parking stalls. Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent. The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet. I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Sd Rpt1SUBTT18179StdCond 6-27.doc Project No. suerr1tP492 Completion Date E. Trip Reduction Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily residential projects of more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. F 2. Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and other non-residential development. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. 3. Within parking tots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 4. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 5. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 6. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 8. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department. -~-~- -~-~ -~-~- -~-~- / / -~-~- -~-~- _/_/ -~-~- I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT78179sidCOntl 6-27.doc Protect No. suBrrttP493 Completion Date Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue in accordance with the Foothill Boulevard Route 66 Visual Plan Improvement Plan. 10. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 11. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department. 12. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. G. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. H. Environmental Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on-and off-site. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to final occupancy release. The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 3. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) General Requirements Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; / / / / / / / / / / -/-/- / / / / / / / / I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stt Rpt\SUBTT78179StdCond 6-27.doc Project No. suemap494 Completion Date c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (SU6TT18179) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. _/-/- J. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the project file number (SUBTT18179). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for_ a new residential project or major addition, the applicant _/_/_ shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public _/_/_ counter). 6. Submit pool plans to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department _/_/_ for approval. K. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. _/_/_ 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. _/_/_ I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stt Rpt\SUBTT78179StdCond 6-27.doc Project No. suBrr,eP495 Completion Date 4. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC _/_/_ Section 1505. 5. Provide draft stops in attics in line with common walls. _/_/_ 6. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 7. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. _/_/_ 8. If the area of habitable space above the first floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the _/_/_ construction type shall be V-1 Hour minimum. 9. Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be not less than 1-hour _/_/_ fire-resistive construction. L. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ pertorm such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/_ time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for _/_/_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. M. Additional Requirements/Comments 1. The project shall fully comply with accessibility requirements of 2001 California Building Code _/_/_ Chapter 11A (Housing Accessibility) APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights-ot-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, _/_/_ community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from _/_/_ street centerline): 60 total feet on Foothill Boulevard _/_/_ 44 total feet on Grove Avenue _/_/_ 7 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res 8 SH Rpt\SUBTT18179StdCond 647.doc Project No. suBrr1ep496 Completion Date 3. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 4. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved. 5. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. 6. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map. 7. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. O. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, communitytrails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development. 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limiteii to: Street Name Curb & Gutter AC. Pvmt Sitle- walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Troll Median Island Bike Tmil Other Foothill Boulevard X X (c) X X (d) Grove Avenue X X X X Red Hill Country Club Drive X X X X X Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. ~ / -~-~- -~-~- / / / / -~-~- / / -~-~- / / I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res 8 Stf Rpt\SUBTT18179SttlCond 6-27.doc Profeot No. suRrr1eP497 Comoletion Date 5. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a _/_/_ construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and _/_/_ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction _/_/_ project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City _/_/_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _/_/_ adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be _/_/_ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan _/_/_ check. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in _/_/_ acc ordance with the City's street tree program. I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Sif Rpt\SUBTT78179StdCond 6-27.doc Project No. sueTr1tP498 Comoletion Date 6. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Mln. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size qty. Foothill Boulevard Non-Activity Centers - Prunus Blireiana NCN 3 fl. 20 ft. o.c. - 15-gal. Fill-in Accent Tree Informal groupings not more than 25% of total frontage trees Non-Activity Centers Platanus racemosa California Sycamore 8 ft. 35 ft. o.c. - 15-gal. Informal groupings Non-Activity Centers Platanus acerifolia London Plane Tree 30 ft. o.c.- 15-gal. Informal rou in s Tree Wells Lagerstroemia ~ Pink Crape Myrtle 3 ft. Per tree well 24-inch indica "Tuscarora" design box Grove Avenue Hymenosprorum Sweetshade 5 ft. 20 ft. o.c. 15-gal. flavum Red Hill CC Drive N/o Foothill Boulevard Platanus acerifolia London Plane Tree 8 ft. 30 ft. 15-gal. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by.the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. P. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 2. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan Foothill Boulevard. 10 / / / / / / / / I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Sd Rpt\SUBTT18179SidCond 6-27.doc Protect No. suBrrttP499 Comoletion Date Q. Drainage and Flood Control 1. The project (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 2. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone AO designation removed from the project area. The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain an unshaded "X" designation. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR)'shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMB) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. 3. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 4. A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way. 5. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. R. UtllltleS 1. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary 2. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley W ater District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. S. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED 11 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM~2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18179StdCond 6-27.doc P500 ~_.~.a' . Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ~~ , .} ~~ Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS August 16, 2006 Arbors at Route 66 Charles Joseph & Associates 8212 Red Hill County Club Drive Mixed Use Subdivision SUBTT18179 & DRC2006-00341 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at htto://www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us/fire/index.htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section. Search by article; the preceding number of the standard refers to the article. Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial projects is 300 feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150 feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100 feet. b. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in multi-family residential projects is 400 feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 200 feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150 feet. c. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential projects is 500 feet. No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250 feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200 feet. d. For single-family residential projects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area, the maximum distance between fire hydrants is 400 feet. No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 200 feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150 feet. e. Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: P501 At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways. At intersections. iii. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. iv. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. v. A minimum of forty feet (40') from any building. If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150 feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. g. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1,000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof. FSC-2 Fire Flow The required fire flow for this project is 1,500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. The required minimum fire flow for this project, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 1500gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 or 13R with central station monitoring. This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 3. The required minimum fire flow for structures located in the designated hazardous fire area shall be not less than 1,750 gpm at 20-psi residual. For structures in excess of 36,000 square feet use CFC Table A-III-A-1. 4. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 5. Firewater plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 6. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600 feet of the proposed project site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. 2 P502 FSC-4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems . Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in: Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet. 2. Group "A" Occupancies. 3. "E" Occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more persons. 4. Multi-family residential structures in excess of 4 units. 5. All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (see Fire Access). 6. When required fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure. 7. When the building access does not meet the requirements of the 2001 California Building Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard #9-7. 8. When any applicable code or standard requires the structure to be sprinklered. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System 1. RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or standards) requires an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system. Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Building Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code. 2. ,Prior to installation of the building fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' plan dheck approval and a building permit must be obtained. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lanes Standard #9-7. Location of Access: All portions of the structures 1st story exterior wall shall be located within 150 feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26 feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24 feet. c. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50 feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45 feet. 3 P503 e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12 percent. i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways: Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows: a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2. The following design requirements apply: a. The gate shall be motorized and slide open horizontally or swing inward. b. All gates must open at the rate of one second for each one-foot of required width. c. When fully open, the minimum width shall be 20 feet. d. Gates are not required to be motorized. 6. Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1. The following design requirements apply: a. All automatic gates shall be provided with a Fire District approved, compatible traffic pre-emption device. The devices shall be digital. Analog devices are not acceptable. Devices shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and specifications. b. Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch. c. The key switch shall be located outside and immediately adjacent to the gate for use in the event that the traffic pre-emption device fails to operate. d. A traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. e. The gate shall remain in the open position for not less than 20 minutes and shall automatically reset. 4 P504 7. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 8. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. 9. Roof Access: There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75 feet above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder. b. A minimum of. one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard 9-9 Appendix A and drawings 9-9a and 9-9b. h. A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire District vehicle access and water supply from a public or private water main system before construction. FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • Magnesium Working • Application of Flammable Finishes • Candles and open flames in assemblies • Compressed Gases • Public Assembly • Dry Cleaning Plants • Flammable and Combustible Liquids • Hazardous Materials public Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • Liquefied Petroleum Gases • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings 5 P505 FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards. Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance. The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. California Government Code, Section 65850.2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure requirements. A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility. 2. Any business that operates on rented or leased oropertv which is required to submit a Plan, is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions. The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner. FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this project. The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided. The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office. Reciprocal access agreement -Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and anon-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. 6 P506 Reciprocal water covenant -Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general). The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CVWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard # 9-8. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CVWD. personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CVWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Fuel Modification Plans: Please refer to RCFPD Summary of Fire Hazardous Area requirements. 4. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14 feet 6 inches above the finished surface of the road. 5. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CVW D must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 7 P507 6. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant Iodation on the street or driveway in accordance with the-City of Randho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant.location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. P508 9. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. 10. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi- family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness. When the building setback expeeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance. Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial and industrial buildings. The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites. 11. Hazardous Materials: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division. The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 12. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 13. Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'/z-inch by 11-inch or 11-inch by 17-inch site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. :,.; ~%i.P,CL G~Zf.U lD4ll/i2~X?~L ~~~(.CGfJ• CfiY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SEP ] 7 2007 September 12, 2007 Honorable Mayor Don Kurth and Members of the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RECEIVED -PLANNING Re: DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT18179 & DRC2006-00341 Dear Honorable Mayor Kurth and Members of the City Council, I am writing this letter to express serious concerns about the plans for the "mixed use" project currently planned for the property located on the north-east corner of Grove. Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. As you know, a good portion of the planned project abuts the property of Red Hill Country Club. As President of The Board of Directors of Red Hill Country Club, I am writing on behalf of the Board and our 400 members to express our concerns and ask that you re-visit your recommended approval of this project. Many of our members are also owners of homes abutting, or in close proximity to the golf course, and are very concerned about the approval of such a dense project in the area and the effect that it may have on traffic and home values in the immediate neighborhood of our Club. The developer has distorted the allowable uses within the mixed use zone to present a project that does not conform to surrounding uses. Due to the location and proximity to both commercial and residential uses, the mixed use zoning code may or may not be appropriate for this property. The mixed use zones generally call for a higher density residential community than is appropriate-forthfs area. The surrounding and directly adjacent, non- commercial, uses are open space and low density residential (2-4 per acre). This plan more than triples the density of the homes currently surrounding our golf course. Reviewing the site plan and the Staff Report prepared for the Planning Commission, it appears that~this project was planned without the consideration of the layout of the golf course as outlined below: 8358 Red Hill Country Club Drive • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909j 982-1358 • Fax (909) 982-8195 Honorable Mayor Don Kurth and Members of the City Council September 12, 2007 Page Two 1) Location of common use areas along the eastem perimeter. According to the site plan, there is an "open space" area at the north-east corner of the project and a "fire ring and BBQ picnic" area further south along the eastem boundary. Both of the areas are situated along the fairway for hole # 2 at Red Hill. The common areas should not be located where errant golf shots can land. 2) The Planning Commission Staff Report calls for "relaxed" standards to set-back requirements, height limitations, private open space requirements front set backs. The standard setbacks and other requirements contained within mixed use guidelines are already "relaxed" when compared to the standards for traditional residential uses. Requesting to use averaging or unilaterally waving of these already sub par guidelines is not appropriate. Each of the proposed issues should be declined as presented, or, at the very least, each item should be discussed and decided on individually, giving the City Council and Planning Commission more time and information, instead of lumping them altogether quietly without proper discussion or reasoning. The traffic analysis offers an unfair comparative evaluation of potential uses. The study only evaluates higher impact uses that naturally show a greater impact to traffic. The developer should have been required to study an alternative less dense single-family home development that conforms to the zoning of surrounding residential uses. This scenario would have the least impact to traffic in the area, having fewer cars and fewer trips than any of the uses cited in their traffic analysis. Perimeter set backs. We are not only concerned that applicant is proposing to average the setbacks where favorable, but in addition that the standard setbacks are not sufficient. It appears that no consideration was given as to the existing setbacks of both single-family homes as well as multifamily currently located on our golf course. The prescribed standard setback for the rear of the buildings is only 15 to 25 feet from the property Honorable Mayor Don Kurth and Members of the City Council September 12, 2007 Page Three line. When adjacent to a golf course fairway, a 25 foot setback does not sufficiently prevent errant golf shots from impacting the building, let alone allowing an "averaging" that equates to an even shorter distance between the course and the structure. Visually, two-story structures within the proposed 25 feet of the property line will look like they are part of the golf course, which is not what we as members want. The issues addressed above are just a few of the concerns that we as a Board have identified as problematic. The site plan, as currently designed, does not fit with the surrounding uses. Although we understand that we do not own the property, we believe that our concerns should be addressed. Please know that we do not oppose development of this property. However, we are extremely disappointed in this proposal and would like to see this plan denied. Over the last several years we have made several improvements to the grounds and the facilities of our Country Club and many of our neighbors have made huge strides at improving their properties: The proposed development is not complimentary to our improvements, but a detriment to the visual aesthetics and poses significant safety concerns. Your time and consideration is appreciated. On behalf of the 400 members of Red Hill Country Club I am requesting that the Application is denied as proposed. Very truly yours, RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB Greg Severson President Cc: James R. Troyer, AICP li Vance Pomeroy Agreement between the Arbors at Route 66, LLC and Board of Directors of Red Hill Country Club The Arbors at Route 66, LLC (Developer) has agreed to the following provisions regarding the development contiguous to Red Hill Country Club(RHCC): Developer to construct a 6 foot "Split Face" block wall facing the Country Club side of said wall. Furthermore, Developer to add "decorative" wrought iron of 2 feet on top of said wall. Developer to construct Stone "pilasters" along said wall at various intervals. 2. Developer to agree to landscape with trees and/or shrubbery along said wall on the RHCC side of the wall. All parties agree to a spirit of reasonableness with regard to said landscaping. 3. Developer agrees to eliminate the six Two-story homes on the northern boundary of the development and replace same with one-story single family homes. 4. Developer acknowledges that they are responsible for existing drainage that comes from anywhere on the RHCC property onto their development. 5. Developer to assure RHCC that CC&R's will adequately include a provision .for any prospective property owner that they are adjacent to a golf course and are aware of standard golf course maintenance. 6. Developer agrees to contribute an amount not to exceed $50,000 for the reconfiguration of the Number 3 tee box at RHCC. Included in this amount are the construction costs of the cart path around new tee box. All parties acknowledge that items number I, 3 and 4 may/will require City approval. At the time City approval of the project is attained by Developer all items in this agreement between the Developer and RHCC shall become binding. Both parties agree to_ mutually cooperate with each other regarding matters of the coordination of general construction and grading. ~~ Agreed to this ~ of September, 2007 ./~ Peter Bachmann, Arbors at Route 66 LLC r President, ) ,RHHC RESOLUTION NO. 07-xx A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00341, THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. SUBTT18179, AND THE MASTER PLAN UNDER THE NEWLY ESTABLISHED MASTER PLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND GROVE AVENUE IN THE MIXED USE DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 AND 45. A. Recitals. 1. Arbors at Route 66, LLC filed an application for the Development Review of Tentative Tract SUBTT18179, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 27th day of June 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application at a duly noticed public hearing and approved the application as Resolution No. 07-39 at that meeting. 3. The decision and environmental assessment represented by said Planning Commission Resolution was appealed in a timely manner to this City Council. 4. On September 19, 2007, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above-referenced meeting on September 19, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, the minutes of the above-referenced Planning Commission meeting, and the contents of Planning Commission Resolution No. 07-39, and together with public testimony, this City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 10.1 acres of land, basically an irregular quadrangle configuration, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue and is presently agriculturally and residentially developed; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is a golf course, the property to the south consists of commercial shops, the property to the east is single-family residences, and the property to the west is commercial uses within the City of Upland; and c. The Master Plan is subject to the approval of a Master Plan Overlay District for the property; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-XX DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 2 d. The applicant has provided substantial technical evidence to support these conclusions. 3.. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this City Council hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. That the proposed development is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. That the proposed development is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. That the proposed development, togetherwith the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessmentfor the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and; based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared incompliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independentjudgmentand analysis of the City Council. Based on these findings, the City Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The City Council therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-XX DRC2006-00341 - ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 3 upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby denies the appeal, upholds the action of the Planning Commission, and approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) This application is subject to the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, and Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029 by the City Council and approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179 by the Planning Commission. 2) All conditions imposed on General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350 and Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029 by the City Council, and Development Review DRC2006-00341 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179 by the Planning Commission shall be conditions of approval for this resolution. 3) The applicant shall execute a covenant on the land in a form substantially similar to the Parking Declaration attached to the accompanying staff report in order to make the parking area of the office building available to the residents during off hours. 4) The applicant shall execute a covenant on the land in a form substantially similar to the use restrictions attached to the accompanying staff report.in order to only allow uses in the live/work units that are compatible with the Master Plan. 5) The signage for the office building shall incorporate a restrained use of off-lighting orhalo-lighting with minimal identification within the confines of the Foothill Boulevard Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. Sign review is a separate review process. 6) The lobby entry door and surrounding areas shall incorporate decorative security measures to be reviewed by the Planning Director for compatibility with the architectural design of the office building. 7) The applicant shall submit a request to Caltrans for the installation of a protected left-turn signal for southbound Grove Avenue onto Foothill Boulevard and provide any warrant studies required by Caltrans. If approved by Caltrans, applicant shall provide for all improvements necessary for the protected left-turn signal. 8) Developer to construct a 6 foot "split face" block wall facing the Country Club side of said wall. Furthermore, Developer to add "decorative" CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-XX DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 4 wrought iron of 2 feet on top of said wall. Developer to construct stone "pilasters" along said wall at various intervals. 9) Developer to agree to landscape with trees and/or shrubbery along said wall on the RHCC side of the wall. All parties agree to a spirit of reasonableness with regard to said landscaping. 10) Developer agrees to eliminate the sixtwo-story homes on the northern boundary of the development and replace same with one-story single family homes. 11) Developer acknowledges that they are responsible for existing drainage that comes from anywhere on the RHCC property onto their development. 12) Developer to assure RHCC that CC&Rs will adequately include a provision for any prospective property owner that they are adjacent to a golf course and are aware of standard golf course maintenance. 13) Developer agrees to contribute an amount not to exceed $50,000 for the reconfiguration of the Number 3 tee box at RHCC. Included in this amount are the construction costs of the cart path around new tee box. Engineering Department 1) Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. Consider the O,oo runoff flow of 27.8 cfs entering the project site from the north indicated in the January 2006 Parsons-Brinkerhoff Drainage Study prepared for the City. 2) The easement on the property, in Rancho Cucamonga to the City of Upland, is to be quitclaimed by the developer. 3) Final Map shall show corner property line cutoff per City Standard Drawing No. 102, show joint access easements for Lots 1 and 2, and wall-only easement for entry monument. 4) Once Red Hill Country Club Drive is realigned the City will pursue the vacation of the existing Red Hill Country Club Drive along this development's frontage. This development shall install temporary frontage improvements along Red Hill Country Club Drive subject to City Engineer and Planning Director approval. Prior to recordation of the final map this development shall substantiate to the City Engineer's satisfaction that upon future vacation of Red Hill Country Club Drive this development will provide for removals and establishment of the new facilities along Red Hill Country- Club Drive subject to City Engineer and Planning Director approval. 5) Provide a study necessary to determine if protected left-turn signals for north and southbound Grove Avenue onto Foothill Boulevard are warranted and install them subject to Caltrans approval, if necessary. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-XX DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 5 6) Foothill Boulevard improvements, including City entry monument and entry gateway at the Grove Avenue\Foothill Boulevard intersection, streetlights, patterned sidewalk with tree wells, etc. shall conform to the Visual Improvement Program for Foothill Boulevard and the Foothill Bdulevard Districts guidelines outlined in the Development Code. 7) Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Major Divided Arterial Streets" standards. Install curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, sidewalk, streetlights, ADA access ramps, and' street trees per City standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. a) Provide 27,000 and 16,000 lumen HPSV streetlights, in accordance with the Foothill Visual Improvement Plan. b) Provide dual ADA access ramps at the Grove Avenue\Foothill Boulevard intersection per City Standard Drawing No. 102. c) Protect existing street improvements. d) Provide or protect R26(s) "No Stopping" signs along the frontage. e) Protect or replace traffic signal equipment. 8) Grove Avenue frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Secondary Arterial Streets". standards. Install sidewalk, drive approach, streetlights, and street trees per City standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. a) An exception to the 50-foot maximum drive approach width (60 feet is being allowed for this project) is permitted although the drive approach shall comply with City Standard Drawing No. 101 in all other respects. b) Sidewalk shall be property-tine-adjacent and shall comply with City Standard Drawing No. 103, "With Non-Contiguous Sidewalk" example. For the drive approach on Grove Avenue, its intersection with the sidewalk shall comply with City Standard Drawing No. 101, "Non-Contiguous Sidewalk" example. c) Referring to the drive approach, City Standard Drawing No. 101 shows a "non-contiguous" (property-tine-adjacent) sidewalk. crossing the driveway outside of the 90-degree curb return arc. Provide a sidewalk easement necessary for this on the final map. d) The gated driveway is to be in accordance with the City "Gated Entrance Design Guide", except that a 60-foot maximum drive approach width is permitted. e) Provide 9500 lumen HPSV streetlights. f) Protect existing street improvements. g) Provide or protect R26(s) "No Stopping" signs. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-XX DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 6 9) Red Hill Country Club Drive frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Local Streets" standards. Install curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, ADA access ramp at Foothill Boulevard, limited access curb at emergency driveway, streetlights, and street trees per City standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. a) Gated driveway shall be "Emergency Access Only". b) No "turf block" is allowed in the public right-of-way. c) Provide 5800 lumen HPSV streetlights. d) Protect existing street improvements. e) Provide or protect R26(s) "No Stopping" signs. 10) Coordinate the installation of Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements with the City project. 11) A contribution. in-lieu of construction for the future median island in Foothill Boulevard shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever occurs first. -The amount of the contribution shall be one-half the cost of the median times the length of the project frontage. 12) An in-lieu fee for one-half the coat of constructing special pavers within the Foothill Boulevard\Grove Avenue intersection shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee amount shall be based on the square footage of the intersection. 13) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the project side of Grove Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the south side of Foothill Boulevard to the first pole off site north of the north project boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing Grove Ave. shall be undergrounded at the same time. Since the west side of Grove Avenue is in the City of Upland, reimbursement is not an option. 14) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the project side of Red Hill Country Club Drive shall be undergrounded, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing Red Hill Country Club Drive shall be undergrounded at the same time. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 15) Manholes shall be provided wherever public storm drain systems end CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-XX DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 7 and private systems begin. Provide appropriate easements wherever public storm drains cross private property and obtain an encroachment agreement to place private facilities within public rights-of-way. 16) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of the curb to one foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages. 17) Driveway accent paving shall be located outside the public right of way. 18) Public improvement plans shall be 90 percent complete prior to the issuance of grading permits. Public improvement plans shall be 100 percent complete, signed by the City Engineer, and an improvement agreement and bonds executed bythe developer, priorto building permit issuance. 19) Complete the submitted Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) per the requirements of the City Engineer including, but not limited to, showing the Best Management Practices (BMPs) on grading plans, and signing and recording the Memorandum of Agreement. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment'shall complywith SCAQMD Rules401, 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-XX DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 8 • . Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM~o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both .bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-XX DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 9 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 16) Use of Zero-VOC paints (assumes no more than 100 grams/liter of VOC) such as those listed by the SCAQMD of Super-Compliant Architectural Coating Manufacturers. Biological Resources 1) A Tree Removal Permit must be approved that provides for the replacement of the 12 on a 1:1 ratio basis with no fewer than two California Sycamores (Platanus Racemosa) placed in a prominent location in the project. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolitiori or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-XX DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 10 with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, -the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction persorinel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and. curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to. an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PMio emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage- public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions. from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remaih inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-XX DRC2006-00341 - ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 11 Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure fo rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) ..During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Fuscoe Engineering on July 3, 2006, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-XX DRC2006-00341 - ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 12 WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with .the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise Exterior.' 1) Construct a 5-foot high barrier for Lots (Units) 7 through 10 and Lots (Units) 72 through 92 facing Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue. 2) Construct a 5-foot high second floor balcony noise barrier for Lots (Units) 88 and 89 facing Foothill Boulevard. Interior: 3) Provide a "windows closed" condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation for all homes. 4) Provide standard dual-glazed windows with a Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 26 or higher for all units and homes facing Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. 5) To minimize the potential interior noise impacts, lots (units) facing Foothill Boulevard should be provided with weather-stripped solid core exterior doors, and exterior wall/roof assemblies should be free of cut outs and openings. 6) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 7) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120.. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official: Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-XX DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC September 19, 2007 Page 13 construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 8) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in frst phase. 9) Haul truck deliveries shall riot take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. This City Council hereby provides notice to Mr. Rex Gutierrez, the appellant, and Arbors at Route 66 LLC, the applicant, that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of the California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 7. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolutidn, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return-receipt requested, to Arbors at Route 66 LLC at the address identified in City records. r~r~ ~/ ../ ~ O L O 1 d°o N ~ ~ Mp~a Icy d -- ~„ ,+rj-~.., m 3 ~~•~ 9 = t °~.. I+~. ..i.-.- i. ~:7:b•,Ci~ ` 7"; r. .../ U_ ~ _J ~ _~ a 1W J w w U '< LL O r J U W r J O Q U U ~- J W ~ c~ W C ~ ~~ W C] J ~ ~a~, z W ~ L'}°-o ~ J .J ~ J z _ ~,,. Q •- v J d W 0 w v LL rLL~ .y V LQ4l ~~ W -~ a O U U g ~ I v ~ W i U J LD Q a w U u. O C~ J W } F- d (..} ~, t w fl %/y tLl ~_ U J G J _2 ri W LL1 W S K J ~ ~ywa r ~ Q L~ Z a `w 0 W a S (~ S v d W ~~ a~ 7 ur;~d a~,~S lrn~daaua~ j~~a~uI y~3~ fi~ ti. ~~~ t Y fV` ~ '~ (Q '''' C Q. (7 n ~ ~ n ~ y CAD ~ ~ CAD c_On ~ O O ~- O ~ n ~ ~ cn ~ v ~ cn a- ~ ~ ~ -~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~u ~ •~~ •~ ~~ ~~ v~o~~n~ ~-+ CD O ~ f V O ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ fA 3' ~ ~ CD Z '~ ~ v ~ ~ O ~ -~ ~ ~ - _~ n ~ ~ CD O n -z ~ O ~ ~ r+ CQ Q ~, ,~ CD CQ ~ ~ (Q ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~. ~ ~ ~• ~ CQ O. ~ CD CD ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CD ~ ~ ~ Cn ~ CD . ~ \/ N O O O CD v n' v O m~ rf 2 O ~' r~ -o O ~~ N N O ~ O~ O fn O O H ~ do N ~ ~ ~ 0- m d C O U L N ~j U ~ ~ O O N ~ CV N L ~ ~ Q) ~ Q ~ z •~ ~+ O ~ U ~o ~ Q C '~ ~ CL (a -p ~ N ~' ~^>\ ~~ W L O }I ~\ t/ ~ U C O ~- ~ Q. L C O ca `~ N N ~ ~ ~ N v }, ~ o ~ cn ~ M O ~' o ~ . . ~ r tt • i ~ ~R i L ~CC) 1j~3~3 f 9i ~ ' _~~ 4y ~~i~i ~r <~lt7tt~ A~ s. € ii i' _~ _ ~~~: _• +- _i il,l z~_~ _. ~ i ~r ._~~. ~~ !~ .. ~i~ ~~; ~mR TTy ~y~y~ r ~ r ll 9 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~- co m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o cn ~ o o ~ w ~ < . o Lflp ql NC1 ~y~ ~~~~ ~a'n~ ~~ll a m 9~ ~ rv ~ v o ~ ~ v cn ~ D ° ~ ~' ~ v ~, o ~ o ~ o cn . m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ v cn ~ - ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ o o ~ ~ ~ ~' < _. ~ ~' ~ ~ ° ~ ~ .. o ~ `~ ~ o ~ CD ~ .. ~ ~ - ~' ~ ~ ~ o -o ~ O ~ N N = O ~ ~~ ~ ~ O ~ O 0 -, ~ ~ -~ m O O O U cA ~ O ~_ O ~ L N 'U 5O N ~ ~ Q~ G ~ ~ .~ N ~ ~ L r ~ = O ~ ~--i L ~ ~ ~ O L (n L C O ~ N ~ O N ^, N W Q ^' O ~_ O .3 Q N Q 3 C 01 N ~ V ~ ~ r ~~ W ~~ ~°o O l- ~ N O I~ W i .,.~ . rt:. .~,~_ ~ .f • 'A.w ii 1... 1~ J 1r ~ SI 0 W 4 Q e Y !, °D ' m ~ i v ~ O ~ cn ~ ~ m ~ ~' ~ ~ ~~ m ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° C ~ v ~ m ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ O ~ v _. Q Q cn ~ N ~ ~ O CD ~' 3 ~ .~ N (~ 7c ~ (Q ~ O CD ~ C7 CD .. ~. ~ ~ CD ~ ~~ ~ - C D ~ A ~ ~ C7 ~ C ~ `- ~ - -. Q ~ C O ~ ~ ° vOi rn oo ~I N W -~ N . . r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: ~ ~ ~ o m cn ~ m ~ O ~ ~ cn ~' v ~ ° ~ c ~ ~ o ~ N ~ N ~ O ,- Q CD N ~ C ~ cn ~ cn ~ c~ ~ ' a cu ~ m ~ ~ C ~ c ~ o ~. . ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ cn m ~ m ~ ~ cn m o 0 0 0 0 0 gyp' O ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ -' N a G CQ W U7 a° N 00 O c n I ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ po -~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N ~ ~ CD '~ cfl O ~' ~ :_,, ~ ~ ~ CD N ~ , , ~ O ~ ~ CD ~ ~. (n O ~ (~ CQ ,~ CD ~ ~ O -~ W a o ~ ~ N N ~- O ~ ~ O ~ m m o ~ O ~ ~ a m ~ N CO ~ ~ t0 L W V' O O Q O v Q O ~ (~ ~ ~ v ~ N ~ ._ ~ ~ ~ O a Y ~- 00 0~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a, ~ ~ ~, ~ c a~ ~ ~ N L ~ a a~ 1 _ ~ /~ KJ a L ~ N N ~ ~ .~ •~ L f/1 ~~ ~ O ^ L L • O ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ O N L.L ~ ~ a • D ~. • v m v • v v' r ~' O C _~ ~ X~ ~ O ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~- rn O c~ W 0 ~' .Q ~' c~ .~!~ c v . . o o ~ m m ~ - m ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ m m ~ ~ ~ ~ n o a ~ c~ W a a~ a 3 ti Q ~' ~ m ~ ~ N Z N O ~ ~ -I 3, O ~ O z ~ ~ ~ m ~" Oo ~ o d~ ~ N o ~' ma d W U O N J .-. N ~ w.. ' O n `~ C C ' U O } ~ ~ o rn c } ~ Q ~N ~ ~ •- 0 t ~ V ~ C C O • N ~ ~ } ~ Q O C ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ n o v a ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ o~ ~.. a .,E . q N 91 ~ O v ~~~~, ~. ~..~ C ._ 3 N t ~ ~I 0 ~i ~ t o~ u ._ ~. 'S, ~ : ~+~ e.! 5 C a ~ N Q ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ I ~ ~ . Q .~ to ~ N ~ H - . . ~ y .3 = ~ a _ ~ ~ u x c ~ `. ~ 3 ~ ~ 3 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o te o ~ .~ V y- ,, A W U U U h O y •y ~ ~ 'N U O } ~ c C •- s v ~ o v o ~ ~ v a ~ V W i_ 8 A ~ ~ ~ O QW / ~ A A,, i N i:~ a Q N O f n Q -w n ~' rt Q rt N N n N N N A • Q ~ N Q N ~. --~- . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ rt V' ~ Q Q -~- ~ ~7 to O OC /^Q /~ /A /'1 rt ~--~ N V rt N ~ y N ~_ O O ~ ~ H O 'Q (n 'Q ~--~ Q~ .~ 'd' O ? O ~ O L O ~ N Q ~ ~ 0. ~ L '~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O p t.~l ~ ~ Ai ~, C7 ~ ^d ~ ~ ~ y U .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'C ~ "d '~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, +~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~' v °~ a~ ~ .~ .~ ~ ~ ~ A -~ c .~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cs V °o o A ~ ~° ~ ~' .~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ °o o ~ ~ ~ ~ .,._, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ 'd +~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ O ~ ~ ~d ~ i" ~ U ~ ~ ~O sr ~ ~ O ~ +~ ,~ ~ ~' ~ ~ b ~ •~ ~' b ~ ~ ~ `~ O a~ y 'd ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ '~ :~ ~ O ;~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ +j C ~ v "' c~ ~ .~ a ~ o ~ ~~ c N Q N 0 C N C Q rt N 0 3 Q. N 0 Q N N ~. Q N rt 1 rt rt S 3 x' D Q e--f- ~• X 0 ~1 C m~ \V ~Ny W N N O ~ ~ ~ "~ m ~~ O ~' ° 1-- ~ d°o N ~a m 'Q 0 U N 0 N Q N Q O a ~ Q ~ ~ ao ~ C ~ Q~ ~~ 3a~ ~ ~ O ~ a o~ Q. ~ o ~ a~ H } ~} ~ c ~_ y .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~~ .~a~ O ~ p O ~ N O } •~ ~ o c ~ ~ p = N ~ ~ ~ . ~ ? O ~ O ~ C A, O ~ U V ~ N ~ O N ~ H ~ N X_ O .~ ~ ~ ~ } X H ~ N N = .~ V ~ a } ~ O O O C .~ 3 ~ ~ } - > V ~ L•H a~ O ~ ~ o o c a~ ~ ,H x H a~~ _~ ~ ~ N } C C O ~ ~° •~} t .. 3 ~' ~ c } U = O C 'C N ~ `~ } tn.y O X N-~ H~ ~~' -~ ~ O = .~ a0 } } ~ ~ a _ .N ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . L `' A~ •~ ~ } ~ ' W U O O ~ ~ ' ~ t ~ iii N • • Q O C O N H ~ f Q Q N -t N Q Q .~ (~ Q ~• f _~ ~• N f W d O m d '~' ~ ~ ~, O - O ° ~ o N •- ~ ~ ~ o . (~ U .. J ., m d H .. Z O m .. H d Z c~ w 0 W N O Z 5 J .- 'Q H .. Z O W N d m d U Z O d Z .. W D W D Z 5 .. J m H a O U 0 Z d • • ~ Q ~ SQ y ~. ~ n ~ ~ ~ Q ~• N ~ C ~- N n C 0 Q _. ~ -~r _. ~ y. T! ~"F ~./~ n _. ~ ~ H O N N ~ ~ C N rt N • • v ~ ~ Q C• ~ ~ ~ ~~ rt 0 ~~ J Q. N ~ C ~ ~. Q N N ~ n N O • rn (~ y. N ^^~ V~ Q Q ~ C0 ~ y N ~ ~ ~ ~ O N ~ Q c ~D ~_ ~ N rt. ~ ~ ~ O Q ~ n ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ r~ C ~ O ~ --I ° ~ ~ e--r o O ~ ~ "'I cn m < ~ 0 d m d 0 0 a 0 U .~ .~ O ~ N ~ ~~ ~ -~- ~ ~ o ~ a~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ U 4) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ -- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n1 N •- u W n 1 ~ ~ rl ~ ~ N ~ ~ ,_ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ o ~ > 4) ~ U ~ 4~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ C'~D cn C7 ~ O c~ ~ `G ~ ~ _ n ~ ~v m vii <' O ~_ ~ ~ ~ O ,--r N ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ D v ~ ~ < ~-+ ~D ~ ~ v~ ~ ~ O ~• fn ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ CQ ~ ~ o cn ~ ~ ~ ~ n CD CD ~ ~ ~ (n Cp C D ~ A ~ ~ ~ o m ~ ~. ~ o o ~' o . ~ m ~ ~ ~ O _. tQ N N ~C N O. _~ n~ ~' 7°0 N N O ~ ~ ~ O ~ -~ m W~ ~O MM~ I.1~ O ~. o d~ ~ ~' oa m 0 U ~ ~ C6 '~' L ~--' 4- t~ ~--i C6 N L Q '+"~ C6 (~ a~ C~ a~ O Q ~ X U ~ O x -~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ _ L O ~ - m Q O ~ ~ ~ 3 N L ~ ~ ~ ~, O 3 O U p O~ X ~ U O O N O~ U ~ c0 ~ O p 0 O ~ ~ ~~ ~ rn 3 0 a a o ^ ^ .~ _~ N ~ > H ~.: O ~ K_ . ..i ~ AI' 5 ttt ~~, L V '. ~ ~ n ~ ~ N 0 d ,o ~ °' a` ~ . ~ r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ «~ N sdul /~I!R7 ~ (n ~+ `'- ~ ~ O ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O Q Q ~ ~ ~ ~ "~ _~ L (~ (~ O ~ ~ U .~ L ~ C ~ L ~ ~ C ~ d. ~ Q C6 cn ~ C6 C~ N C~ ~~ C6 c ~ c ~ o ~~ c ~ Q1 ~ Q ~ 1/~1~ 1~ L a.., L ~ o C~ ~ a~ ~ ~ •- N O N n C C rt --~ O Q N _. ~, .. •o rn rn ('~ 3 ~+ Q ~ -a o ~ Q Q x c -• cD cD lD f~D -~+ c = ~ Q N ('~ Q ~ ~. 7 •• ~ ~ r n ~ ~ (~ 3 ~ Q ~ ~ N ~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ N~ S ~ 3 ~•v,'N N (~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. O •• ~ ~ ~ o O X .~ N N Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O rt 7 (~ ~ Q 3 ~ ~• n 0 ~ ~ ~ C N Q ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ _ -t ~. ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rt Q V ~ ~ n n 0 W ~~ N N o~ o ,~ °o '~ O ~~ GO ' N N O N t } .. ~ p ~ ~ ._ ._ ~ N 3 s a v v . ~ 3 ~ o } o ~ o ~ ~ ~ o a~ a = ._ H U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U V X N ~ ~ W N N • ~ ~ n CD < Q Q N~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O 0 _~ N N ~ S~ ~ Q N ~ /^~ /'1 ~ J ~~ (~ O O. ~ N ~ _ rnrn~ O \V ~ W CD o~ Q CD ~ 1.L ~• ~ N ~~ n Q Q Q .p N v v N ~ ^^~. ~ `JJ ~ `V Q N rnrn~ l to ~ • C n ~ ~ O Q ~ O N Q rn ~/V ~ ~ _ / Q ^N ~ ^ u n C ~ ,V Q ~ _ N• Q ~. _. rnNrn ~ lV ~ (,/) ~ ~ N ~. n ~_ ~ I O n O '-. IQ r~ I (.. 0 ~ 0 ~ C W~ ~Oo W ~ ].. o d~ ~~ Oa d 0 U ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° U_ ~ O V N ~ ~ ~3 U ~ O O ~ U ~~~ O °~ L O W m N O O L .~ N ° N (U T N ° O U N Q .~ .~ ~.~..~ N .~ N i ~ ~` ° lo~ ~ U T O O Q .~ ° .~ ° ° N ~ ~ U ~ .- ~ ~ -° .° o N Q ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ N ~ ._ ~ ~ N ~ W 3 ° ° L~ ~ O ~ ~ `~ ~ ~ •~ ~ ~ N . ~ N ~ /'1 ° ~ w ~ `~' ~ U ~ ~ ~ L~ ~ ~ - ~ m 3 ~ L ~ N Q VJ .~ O Q N ^N` N Q ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rn Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ < ~ CQ O ~ CQ CD CD CD C ~ ~„ ~• Q O ~ ~~' O ~ ~ O Q~ ~ Q~ O W Qom QnQ s -~~ ~ ~' to ~ O Q ~ N D' Q n_ ~ Q O o --I ~ C O ~ C ~ O ~~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ oC QQCD ~ Q~ ~ ~m CD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ n CAD ~ O ~ O (N O O ~ O Q CD CD Q C ci ~ Q ~ • Q Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ QC~C~D ~'O O Q ~ ~ ~~ -,- ~ ~ p ~ CD ~ Q O ~ ~ ~ ~ Q.{~ ~ `~ ~ ~ n` N W ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ O ~ ~ N U N N O ~ ^ ` i ~.J N N ~ Q o D ~~ D ~ D Q D o ~ ~ rt N ~ ~ N ~ p' O ~ Q ~ ~. Q ~ ~ rt ~ ~ C 3 Q ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q -., c, ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ o ~ ~ o ~ c ~ ~ Q ~ ~ o ~ H N ~' ~ c c ~ O N ~ ~ ~ ~ H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N O O ~+ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H ~ ~ Q. D =~~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ y C C_ n rt ~D ~D ~ ~ 7 ~. < Q ~ C r S ~ Q ~ N O v<~' ~Q• ~ ~. -„ O ~ O 7~ N. ~ n ~ ~ O < cQ' ~ ~ ~ ~. Q ~ o Q^ ~ O ~ N~ ~ C ( )~.~ 0 Q ~ ~. Q~ ~- ~ Q ~, o Q ~ ~ rn Q ~ N. Q O ~ O ~ Q ~, ~, ;~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ Q ~ Q ~ Q ~. C1 ~ ~ ~ n ~ CD~ Q 0 ~. O ,_+ N 7~0 0 -o ~ ~N o~ 0 00 O C ~ --[ ~~ 0 0 O U ~ .N Q O - ~ O ~ ~ U Q3 ~y ~ .~ ~ C ~ U a •Q ~~ c ~ a,°o ~ N ~ _~ O C H ~ ~ O V ~ V Q C ~ ~ Q .~ N } ~ ~ N ~N ~ 8 N } d ~ ~ -~ i = ~ V Q~ ~ •~ L O O O ~ ~ ~ ~~D~~ ~~c~cOO-~ o~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~o~~m ~o=~~,~m o~QO<~ CD~~~~o~ ~~rno~ ~oQ~.~~~ ,rt ~cn v -~`~-a oc~ ~~~rnC~ ~~o o~C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,..~ m O m cOn ~ v N o ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. Q~m_o. ~o~~.oo~ ~°~~~ mv~i'Q~ao ~ -~ ~ ~~~D~ ~~vv~~ v ~m~ ~,~cncno~ ~~~~~ m~~,.~v ~ ~ ~o~~c~ ~ ov~~~ ~ ~ ~'ooo~ ~,~o~~~ ~~ m~ o o~ v o 0 ~ ~~ ~-+~ ~~ ~ m ~_ ~ ~ O c cn ~ ~ Q- •--~- `~ CD ~. ~ ~ ~ n C ~ ~ (n ~ ~ o ~ ~ O fA fn ~• ~ v ~« CD ~ ~ _. N ~ ~~ ~~ ~ Q~ ,~ v ~ CD C ~ ~ N ~ CD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O CA~ ~' ono O ~~ ~~ °o~ 00 °oC ~ `~ ~~ STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEP.~IRTA4ENT Date: September 19, 2007 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Donna Vega, Management Aide '~ ~. RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO.~ PROHIBITING THE USE OF EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE FOOD SERVICE PRODUCTS AT CITY FACILITIES AND CITY SPONSORED EVENTS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve and adopt Resolution No.,~?~ prohibiting the use of expanded polystyrene food service products at City facilities and at City-sponsored events. BACKGROUND At the June 6, 2007 City Council meeting, Council requested information regarding the likelihood of implementing a ban on expanded polystyrene in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Staff conducted research on this issue, and at the July 18, 2007 City Council meeting, presented Council with information on the expanded polystyrene bans adopted in other localities and issues associated with such bans. The policies discussed included those directed at City facilities and City-sponsored events only, as well as comprehensive policies designed to eliminate the use of expanded polystyrene in all retail food establishments. Upon consideration of the various issues surrounding a ban on expanded polystyrene, Council directed Staff to draft a Resolution that prohibits the use of expanded polystyrene food service products at all City facilities and City-sponsored events. Expanded polystyrene, which is frequently referred to by its trademark name "Styrofoam," is a petroleum based plastic commonly used to manufacture disposable food service products. Food containers, coffee cups, and other disposable items made from expanded polystyrene have been found to have negative effects on the environment. They are often found clogging storm drains and waterways, take hundreds to thousands of years to deteriorate in the environment, and are a major component of litter and marine pollution. In order to reduce the harmful effects these products have on the environment, a growing number of cities have taken action and are banning the use of expanded polystyrene food service products within their communities. While there are an abundance of methods available for recycling plastics in Rancho Cucamonga, the opportunities for recycling expanded polystyrene food service products are virtually non-existent. Environmentally sound alternatives to expanded polystyrene that are both biodegradable and recyclable offer viable solutions to the harmful effects polystyrene has on the environment. With a possible increase in diversion requirements quickly approaching, it is all the more necessary that -the City implement an expanded polystyrene ban in order to remain in compliance with State requirements, as well as maintain the quality of the environment. P509 During the development of this Resolution, Staff worked closely with the Community Services Department, whom handles all of the City's special events and facility rentals, in order to draft a policy P510 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. _ PROHIBITING THE USE OF EXPANDED PAGE 2 POLYSTYRENE FOOD SERVICE PRODUCTS AT CITY FACILITIES AND CITY SPONSORED EVENTS S6t>rsntE3t?iz 19, ?007 that is representative of the Council's desire to reduce the negative impacts of expanded polystyrene products on the environment. The programs reported to be currently using expanded polystyrene food service products include the Central Park "Old-timers' program, the Cultural Center concession stand, youth sports snack bars, and the Quakes concession stand. Additional parties that would also be affected by a ban include special events vendors and facility rental groups, which frequently bring their own food service products to events and City facilities. The only program that reported a fiscal impact resulting from this ban is the Central Park "Old-timers" program, which estimates a cost increase of approximately $4,620 to switch away from expanded polystyrene food service products. This increase will accommodate changes in both the congregate meal program and the home delivered meal program, and includes onetime fees for the purchase of reusable products as well as the labor associated with maintaining those products. It is anticipated that this increase will be absorbed in the department budget. All other Community Services programs reported a quick and easy transition away from expanded polystyrene food service products. In order to allow these groups to use up their existing supply of expanded polystyrene products, the Resolution should include a 90 (ninety) day grace period from its date of passage before allowing the ban to go into effect. Staff also met with the Rancho Cucamonga Quakes to discuss the details of the ban and assess the impact it would have on their operations. The Quakes reported using expanded polystyrene products for their 32 oz. cold beverages, 12 oz. hot beverages (coffee and hot cocoa), smoothies, and chicken plates. They expressed a willingness to comply with the terms of the ban, and did not foresee it causing any significant impact on their operations. With the 90 day grace period requested by the Community Services Department, the ban would not affect the Quakes until the start of their 2008 season, allowing sufficient time for them to make the necessary adjustments to comply with the requirements of the ban. In addition to improving the environmental awareness of City practices and establishing the City as an example of environmental stewardship in the community, it is anticipated that this Resolution will encourage all individuals, groups, businesses, non-governmental agencies and other governmental entities to assist in preserving the environment by ceasing to purchase and use expanded polystyrene food service products. Resp ffully , ubmitted, j ~ ~ ~~ William J. O'Neil City Engineer cc: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director Fabian Villenas, Management Analyst III Attachment P511 RESOLUTION NO. v7"~ 3~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROHIBITING THE USE OF EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE (COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS "STYROFOAM") FOOD SERVICE PRODUCTS WITHIN CITY FACILITIES AND AT CITY- SPONSORED EVENTS. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga desires to protect the natural environment for present and future generations; and WHEREAS, expanded polystyrene, a petroleum based product that is frequently used for food service purposes, does not effectively biodegrade in the environment, and merely breaks down into smaller particles that litter City streets, parks, public places, open spaces, and waterways; and WHEREAS, the litter problem resulting from expanded polystyrene is increasingly difficult to manage and contributes to urban blight as litter especially due to its lightweight nature as it floats in water and/or is easily blown in the wind from place to place, even when disposed of properly; and WHEREAS, expanded polystyrene enters various waterways from direct and indirect sources, and poses a risk to land and marine wildlife, which often perish as a result of ingesting expanded polystyrene products; and WHEREAS, expanded polystyrene food service products, by their nature, have a useful life that can be measured in minutes or hours, yet takes several decades to hundreds of years to deteriorate in the environment or landfill; and WHEREAS, there is currently no meaningful recycling of food service expanded polystyrene products, due in part to contamination from food residue; and WHEREAS, biodegradable and recyclable products offer environmentally sound alternatives to products currently used, and are readily available at a reasonable cost. Biodegradable products decay, causing less harm to the environment and the landscape of the City than expanded polystyrene products now in use. Use and recycling of those alternative products saves the cost of disposing of waste in landfills and the energy and other resources used in production of new products; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga desires to exercise environmental stewardship by reducing the amount of expanded polystyrene debris that enters the storm drains, watershed and surrounding environment, and reduce the amount of expanded polystyrene that enters our waste stream. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA does hereby RESOLVE as follows: P512 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. PROHIBITING THE USE OF EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE September 19, 2007 Page 2 Section 1: The City of Rancho Cucamonga shall no longer purchase or acquire food service products which are produced with expanded polystyrene. Prohibited products include, but are not limited to, expanded polystyrene food service items such as cups, plates, bowls, cartons and trays. Section 2: The use or .distribution of expanded polystyrene food service products at all City-owned properties or City facilities shall be prohibited. Rental agreements for usage of these properties shall require that contracting parties assume responsibility for preventing the utilization and/or distribution of expanded polystyrene food service products by any attendee or vendor at the associated function. All rental agreements shall indicate that a portion of the contractor's security deposit will be forfeited if the City Manager, or his/her designee, determines expanded polystyrene food service products were utilized in violation of the rental agreement. Section 3: The use or distribution of expanded polystyrene food service products at all events that are sponsored or co-sponsored by the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be prohibited. This prohibition shall apply to the event organizers, agents of the event organizers, event vendors, and any other party, including non-profit organizations, who enter into an agreement with one or more of the co-sponsors of the event to sell goods or beverages at the event or otherwise provide an event-related service. The prohibition on the use of expanded polystyrene food service products will not be enforced upon individuals who are attending the event solely as a visitor or spectator. Written agreements with any vendor, including non-profit organizations, to sell food or beverages at a City-sponsored event, shall specifically prohibit the usage and distribution of expanded polystyrene food service products. Written agreements shall indicate that any party found in violation of the agreement are subject to penalty, up to and including forfeiture of the event and all fees associated with the event. Section 4: The terms and conditions of this Resolution shall take effect ninety days after its passage and adoption. Section 5: All individuals, groups, businesses, non-governmental agencies and other governmental entities are strongly encouraged to assist in preserving the environment by ceasing to purchase and use expanded polystyrene food service products. MEMORANDUM ENGINEERING DEPdRTMENT Date: September 19, 2007 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Donna Vega RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: REVISION MADE TO AGENDA ITEM NO. P-2, PROHIBITING THE USE OF EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE FOOD SERVICE PRODUCTS AT ALL CITY FACILITIES AND CITY-SPONSORED EVENTS Section 4 of Resolution No. 07-231 PROHIBITING THE USE OF EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE FOOD SERVICE PRODUCTS AT ALL CITY FACILITIES AND CITY-SPONSORED EVENTS has been revised to include a time extension for the "Old-timer's" senior lunch program to comply with the provisions of the Resolution. ' With the modification, the "Old-timer's" senior lunch program will be given one-hundred eighty days (six months) to comply with the provisions of the Resolution. This extension was requested by the Community Services Department in order to allow them sufficient time to accommodate the impact this ban will place on the program. cc: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director Attachment: Resolution No. 07-231 s P RESOLUTION NO. 07-231 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROHIBITING THE USE OF EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE (COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS "STYROFOAM") FOOD SERVICE PRODUCTS WITHIN CITY FACILITIES AND AT CITY- SPONSORED EVENTS. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga desires to protect the natural environment for present and future generations; and WHEREAS, expanded polystyrene, a petroleum based product that is frequently used for food service purposes, does not effectively biodegrade in the environment, and merely breaks down into smaller particles that litter City streets, parks, public places, open spaces, and waterways; and WHEREAS, the litter problem resulting from expanded polystyrene is increasingly difficult to manage and contributes to urban blight as litter especially due to its lightweight nature as it floats in water and/or is easily blown in the wind from place to place, even when disposed of properly; and WHEREAS, expanded polystyrene enters various waterways from direct and indirect sources, and poses a risk to land and marine wildlife, which often perish as a result of ingesting expanded polystyrene products; and WHEREAS, expanded polystyrene food service products, by their nature, have a useful life that can be measured in minutes or hours, yet takes several decades to hundreds of years to deteriorate in the environment or landfill; and WHEREAS, there is currently no meaningful recycling of food service expanded polystyrene products, due in part to contamination from food residue; and WHEREAS, biodegradable and recyclable products offer environmentally sound alternatives to products currently used, and are readily available at a reasonable cost. Biodegradable products decay, causing less harm to the environment and the landscape of the City than expanded polystyrene products now in use. Use and recycling of those alternative products saves the cost of disposing of waste in landfills and the energy and other resources used in production of new products; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga desires to exercise environmental stewardship by reducing the amount of expanded polystyrene debris that enters the storm drains, watershed and surrounding environment, and reduce the amount of expanded polystyrene that enters our waste stream. NOW, THEREFORE, THE -CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA does hereby RESOLVE as follows: Section 1: The City of Rancho Cucamonga shall no longer purchase or acquire food service products which are produced with expanded polystyrene. Prohibited products include, but are not limited to, expanded polystyrene food service items such as cups, plates, bowls, cartons and trays. Section 2: The use or distribution of expanded polystyrene food service products at all City-owned properties or City facilities shall be prohibited. Rental agreements for usage of these properties shall require that contracting parties assume responsibility for preventing the utilization and/or distribution of expanded polystyrene food service products by any attendee or vendor at the associated function. All rental agreements shall indicate that a portion of the contractor's security deposit will be forteited if the City Manager, or his/her designee, determines expanded polystyrene food service products were utilized in violation of the rental agreement. Section 3: The use or distribution of expanded polystyrene food service products at all events that are sponsored or co-sponsored. by the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be prohibited. This prohibition shall apply to the event organizers, agents of the event organizers, event vendors, and any other party, including non-profit organizations, who enter into an agreement with one or more of the co-sponsors of the event to sell goods or beverages at the event or othervvise provide an event-related service. The prohibition on the use of expanded polystyrene food service products will not be enforced upon individuals who are attending the event solely as a visitor or spectator. Written agreements with any vendor, including non-profit organizations, to sell food or beverages at a City-sponsored event, shall specifically prohibit the usage and distribution of expanded polystyrene food service products. Written agreements shall indicate that any party found in violation of the agreement are subject to penalty, up to and including forfeiture of the event and all fees associated with the event. . Section 4: The provisions of this Resolution shall take effect ninety days after its passage and adoption. The senior lunch program shall be given one-hundred eighty days after the passage and adoption of the Resolution in order to comply with the terms and conditions. Section 5: All individuals, groups, businesses, non-governmental and other governmental entities are strongly encouraged to assist in preserving the environment by ceasing to purchase and use expanded polystyrene food service products. PASSED APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this 19`h day of September 2007