The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2005/10/12 - Agenda Packet • • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA cR~oNCn OCTOBER 12, 2005 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Stewart Vice Chairman Macias _ Fletcher _ McNiel_ McPhad_ II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES September 28, 2005 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial They wdl be acted on by the Commission at one hme without discussion If anyone has concern over any dem, it should be removed for discussion A HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2005-00343-THOMAS HUNSUCKER -A request to build a 5,705 square foot house on 48 acre of vacant land, located approximately 182 feet east of the intersection between Laredo Piace and Reales Street-APN 1061-801-25 V. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS B DISCUSSION OF INFILL DEVELOPMENT -ORAL REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA OCTOBER 12, 2005 RnNCxo cucnrrfoNCn 2 C DISCUSSION OF COMMERCIAL REMODELS -ORAL REPORT VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the bme and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda VII. COMMISSION BUSINESS VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m ad/oumment time If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission THE PLANNING COMMISSION W/LL ADJOURN TO A WORKSHOP IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING TO DISCUSS PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2005-00820 - KAMM REALTY, INC. 1, Lois J Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 6, at least 72 hours poor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamong Gt--6 If you need special assistance or accommodations to partiapate m this meeting, please contact the Planning Division at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 46 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired • • Vicinity Map Planning Commission October 12, 2005 ~~~~ • C~ * Meeting Location• Rancho Cucamonga City Hall 10500 Ciwc Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 N City of Rancho Cucamonga • T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA StaffReport DATE: October 12, 2005 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Dan Coleman, Acting Clty Planner gy; Rozalynne Thompson, Contract Planner SUBJECT: HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW - DRC2005-00343 -THOMAS HUNSUCKER - A request to build a 5,705 square foot house on .48 acre of vacant land, located approximately 182 feet east of the intersection between Laredo Place and Reales Street-APN: 1061-801-25. ANALYSIS: A. General: The project site is an irregular-shaped, 20,910 square-foot parcel located on the south side of Reales Street. A 15-foot equestrian easement borders the site to the south. The project consists of a two-story residence with afour-car, side-loading, tuck-under garage and a separate garage for recreational vehicle storage. The proposed 5,705 square foot residence is designed with a minimum of 4 stepped pads that have a total elevation change of 16 feet over the natural grade. The home is designed in a modified Mediterranean style with a covered breezeway connecting the motor home garage to the main residence. The proposed motor home garage will require 7 feet of °cuY with the driveway descending at a maximum 15 percent slope. The remainder of the proposed house will comply with the Hillside Development Regulations, which Includes limiting the maximum depths of the excavations and fills to 5 feet high or less. Furthermore, with the exception of the formal dining room chimney, the proposed home will be within the building envelope as described in the regulations, and Its height will be 30 feet or less as measured from the finished grade. The chimney, as proposed, may prolect above the 30-foot building envelope per section 17.08 060 D of the Development Code. The lot coverage is 24.5 percent, slightly below the 25 percent maximum permissible in-the Very Low Residential-District. Given that the proposed residence will require more than 5 feet of cut at a location, the proiect requires Design Review Committee and Planning Commission review and approval. B. Gradino Review Committee: On September 6, 2005, the Grading Committee reviewed the protect. The Committee recommended approval of the protect without any additional conditions. Item A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00343-THOMAS HUNSUCKER October 12, 2005 Page T - - - ---- -- - - - C. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (McPhail and Coleman) reviewed the Site, Grading, and Architecture Plans on September 6, 2005, and the project was recommended for approval subject to staff recommendations. D. Environmental Assessment: This project is categorically exempt from the regwrements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303(a) of the State CEQA Gwdelines. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Hillside Design Review DRC2005-00343 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. . Dan Coleman Acting City Planner DC:RT/ge Attachments: Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibd C Exhibft D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibft H Draft Res - Location Map - Site Plan - Grading Plan - Sections - Roof Plan - Floor Plans - Elevations - Design Review Committee Action Minutes September 6, 2005 alution of Approval ~~ 1'.,, ~- iRDINO NATIONA ~OREST i` :. :_x' 1 t_sm N ANTONIO r, - - --- -~---- ---- __ I IGHTS t~ ~ I ~' ~ I;s `~ ~ -~~~~ PROJECT SITE E~ r~ r'- a HILL I I I \ / ' ,\ ~~ ~ ~ c ~ inwo I, I 19TH ST I ~ wu ___._ __ __ twa n[w ~ °~~ ~ I Ll o, UPLAND j ~~~~ -------- ----- ------ , -`,R ~,,,rF ~ ' RM„ ., `v, ~ ~ ~ /L9• i~, ~C~~~ - ~--~,.- EXHIBIT A `~~.a„,. - ' °` ` ` `~" i ; ~r ieuw i~w J i z s R t ~~ 1 o ~a Z 'E ~; Z ~ g ip ~ o ~ dLL~ $$ Y x ~ > 8 g ~Cm ~~Q j Q NCb~ g ~ 899 ~0F 7aa~~ -' _- _ T T ~i ;EXHIBIT B z °~' I~ n~ Q ~~~ 3 C~ ~ ~ ~~ r ~ ~~ ~ ~~ b e 0 • o e d N U O y m~ _~ ss~ x E o~ r f~ tiveuu -soon - aaa~ E N - - ~ -=- t,~ ,tea ~^ _ _ ~ s _ _ _ ----___ s '-_ ! --___ ~ ~_ ~"~~.~ ~qv -~ _ _ e - `A fi __ 1 ~-".~'.. -i" a ~'' -~ r T - _ -~- ~p _ 5 Iii' °'~' ~ tT~II~+l -~°'-"-°"=' - ~lo~ Y) i iI i r ~ n ~ ~ , __. - a-r - ~ 's -~,. --- : ~ ~ I ~ ° e - _ - -- EY _ ^i _ ~- " ~ !" ! I _ LE ~ i~ _ ~ ',_ _ _i - i ~ i --- ,- ~ I - s -- ' ~ {'_ _ N'_ f :- -fl --- ` ., - -~ -- -, ~ _~__ _i I.i. i. -~ ~ ~ __ . _,. - l i ~ - --- -- - = ~ -- i -- -- ~ : - -- , e T____-- _ _ _ -- __ t - - - ~ ___ __ ___ ~;r __ __ __ .__ ~,_ __~ - ___._- [ASE`, __ _ _ _ l a L 'Y r_~ _ ~ - -- -_ EXHIBIT C ~~ ~- -- - e~ agg Si ! 1 k y 1 i e ~ ~ ~¢e~g ~ ~~ ~_ a - -~ z Y ,,..., E J I_:~,1 a ~O _~ r `a 4s y~ ~ ~~ ~~ .L~9N1S S37VdX ~ ~ N xv7a ~wovv~ 7vn.aaa~nro~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E U . e ::_- ';,, ,, ,= ", ' b,. ~ 4u 'e, ~6 • C~ t,. r.~e ~~~ O ~~ ~~~ ~ZZ~ -' w~ `• ; , C ,~i ~f"'• , ~r i.. ~~ ,f~' ~~r` r• I' ~ d ,,,,~ ' 9 ~'1~ ~;; . a l h' 1 T ..: L ', r, i'K ;.,11 ~E y =~~ r J~ ~„ .,. ~' I I i - -a.~- - ~' ®~ ,' ~ / ®® ®®^ ~' ~ ^L~.I i -- t-s[-~ ~ ® ~I~ ® rr~ ~~r ~ L I y _ ->1 _. \~ Y ~ g ~ t ~ \' i <i e 0 u 0 N • SOOZ ~ ems- ~ ~ ~ W W D ~ Q ~~~ C7 3 c7 ~~~ • ~ 8~ m a b b ~ 4ar~q a m ~ ° ~' c ~ o C u N [ a ~y FS ?3~ {{cc 3 6 E$ ~ 66~ t EXHIBIT D ~'~ ~/ P I I I I I I I II l ~~ ~-- ~n - i1 ~~ _, `b i U~ U C 0 u M -cnnz- ~ N ~~ W Z ~' C9 3 C7 N ~~ Z 3 ~~ V Q G N O C S '~ O Fu~ ~ a I ~~ CbCM - CMf . nVn 1 M T J N Of r s ~ I ______ __________1 I ry I i ¢ ~. ~ i ~ I ~ ~; ~ - ----- -- ------- --------- u ,~- - ~ --,; ~ I } II b II ~ 1 1 I; 11 G 1 G I 11 I' ~ I 'I 0 I 1 1 1 ---------------- > e ~ II ~ 1 1 1 ~ m }ANCNCx( II - ' I I ---'I 1 ~ ' ~~ is S r ____rnccaa __ I 1 i a E ~ _______________ ~ •yy,~ ~; ~ Rg v%0 ~~~}} I G ;i A• L ~~ D d ,; y i ~; 11 ~~ I _,,~i -=_= R-.=_= ~~=- i a II ;~ ~~ II , ~ ' ;i li ~I li b i~____J~____ c~__n i7 ` ~~ j O Ir __________ _ ~ ~ a ;; ~1 I Ir ~ i~ I~ it ~ ~ ~~ d9{ B 4~ - - - }r' , ~~! ~~ ~~~$ !are I' /- '~ ~ s 11 __________-;=_P=~ i=~r=___=_= C 1-__________ ~ 1 7 1 y If_ ~I ii II _________________ 1 II II ___ ______________ ~1 II II ~ ii II _ ~' ___ 11 ,~ II ~ I ~~ V '1 J' II i II ~ ~~ ,I II .. n -~ ~' .I I I. ,I I II II _y,_ _r ~' ~~ , I ~- p a 1 ------- II ~ , II ;I II 11 II IY/' II c I, 1 1 ~ 1 11 ;/ D j[ I ;1 II I ll_-__-,~- -- l i a __ I Ir n_________ __~I _~ II ii II 11 ~ ii 11 11 a I~ II 1~ _______ __ J _ d I n I f- / II ~' ~ DPI 0 L ,:F ~:. , 1; ;; ; ~ y./~/ ~; I; ;; g 4 ~ II li ii d a 1 11 II II II IL____~_ __ _JI _ /~/ Ir____ _~___1i 0 II II 11 // ~ I ___ _________ ~/ ` I 11 ~I Il__ ________ ~ 11 II 1 1 ~ •` ________ f J ~ L_________ II 11 1~ J )~ 11 11 11 // 1 L~ 1 11 1 II F tt 1 ~~ ~-,, i1 r ;8. I // 1 II I /, -~ r ____________ I _ ,~--------- ~=-------------------- u / ti I/ EXHIBIT E ~ f ~ ~` / rvt:uu ~~ 4 ~ ~ W Z r Q ~~~ C7 3 ~ ,I N ^5 ~ ~ s~~' ° W . g s~ a ~ , E o ' g o N C O W ~ i 0 ~ Y S 7 ~~(( C O ~° F ~ ~ .~- --- Z --~----r - -- 11 G J '1 EXHIBIT F I i sv~oo - sooz - ~aa a ~ ~~ ~ N W ~ Z r ~~a ----- - -- --- - --- - ~ 3 a i -min- ~ --~ ' ~ C=7 i I - i i > > ~~ m~ -~ ~ _ I _ o b ~ 3 ~~~ n O~ QQSS I p _ LEI ~ A ~~ 9 H °nY i c p `°UU' ~ L°J ~ ~J O 11 A I p i \' ~,~ O C 1 8 e O • ~ I kr~ . ~ ~ i ~ O O ~ O i ~~ ~ - ~, - r -~ O € o r D N ~'® ~ - -i _'~ ' _ O C ~ o 8 N __ .~\ ® . ~ (~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o ~, e ~i ~ ~ s ' ~= ---- -- - - a ~ ~~ A ~ ~~ ~~ i , g k ~~ i ~ A'.pp. %` I I , ~ ~.~ i ; ~~ ~~ ~ i i Red ~ I ~.# T ~ I ' ES m °.: wbi no°.: n: n~b~b~~b~nni ~° O eo be.a oq' es4 ~ ~ ~'et,emoe.ee eoei°b: ,`,°be° L5 °3 Csl6 .I„N i' a~Gu. 5 oQ tb S ' I i ' i pCp[~Lp~~ ~ Y Y~ Y - ~ S 3 SYF2 P P Y E I Yi I F `~ J ~ '~'- ' ~ 1 I' ~ R ~ I~ ~ ~ ~~` ,. .~ ~ .~~ ~.i !' r c 't pp 'e E ~gg gy F ~°~j$ d~ ~, ; yy i3 aa P ~AR I~ O .~ a~iA > &~ ~ ~5 5~ I~ ~ ,w . Dlmonsion• On~~y• eui. ur-rv ,{ Mr. Tom Hunsucker ~zere ertlp dlr. Ia~r~o,>m Garage FII>OrDimensloned arohlteetun ozn~,vu~ser GUY w. GARDNER °~FiN°~ 5 ~~~ ~'~ DRC - 2005.00343 °'°"'° ""' 1952 '"" -+~ ~ ~ ~~ C ~V ~ C} U L h N~ 1 r F? ~' I ~ ~ r •i\ ._ ~\ /! U ~m YN ~~~ e ~ ~~~ ~k Y<w•~ o$ q$~ r8 m m W b ~ a m C m Q C K LL N W 3 v m ~ W O ~~ 3 k b 4 i ~--~-- o 4 = ~~ - LL c +-- - on ev~oo - sooz - ~aa ~ K S c o S x s V~ ~ G F EXHIBIT G WY VwYfx _ _- /f~ p Ifb FIRM FW A•f _ _ ~ _ _ f/°{pJpYyl~~`` ]~ wIfHVFP pI~ •rwfltN - f t _ M - ~'T~ T L- _y_ ~.~. may, ~ ~'_L - ll ll - r F _ _ -~-_'"YC _ _ _ - _ V I ~ T~ I ~ TO 11 I 1 -JI '~ 1' ~I ~ I. V~ ~I I III rmu,.~ °m I - aes ~ _ {{~- A _.-___-_ _-_ _-_.}. _ - i -.f -: - I ®®®® ®®®® ~°""" i - : µ a~ I~ ,, _ ~ i m~ ____ _ ~ _________9+vWe-MFRVL_ I """ "" " _ Left (East) Elevetlon '~--_~- - YIM•TO __ -- (M1I M ~ ~-~- y fI J~GSTa I~//~l/~\ ~`. !F® ~ +r +~. ~ cal ~ r- -~l.n I~f . .~ i ® ~ r~ TES yp I ~ pm ~1« -w ~Iti I a0 ~-I -~ •M11 -~ it ~ II I ~° ' I I I ~ ~m ~ Y ~~ ~ YI Right (West) Elevetlon g _ ~ 00 ° nm.rea ___ Mr. Tom Hunsucker Elev's Left & Rlght ~ `h~ a°`~ GUY w. GARDNER ee°'"' turec-W lmr. ~, ,..n' z""" 1952 15 X10 ~'""q'f ~„nA DRC 2005-00343 """"""" "~ -- - ------- ---------- ----- DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:10 p m. Rozalynne Thompson September 6, 2005 HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW - DRC2005-00343-THOMAS HUNSUCKER-A request to build a 5,705 square foot house on .48 acre of vacant land, located approximately 182 feet east of the intersection between Laredo Place and Reales Street-APN:l061-801-25. Design Parameters: The protect site is generally rectangular in shape with an overall depth of about 233 north-south by 92 feet east-west. All of the surrounding properties are vacant, with the exception of a parcel to the east and the northwest. The proposed residence is setback 52 feet from the curb face. The proposed two-story with a side-loading garage is designed with a minimum of four stepped pads that have a total elevation change of 16 feet over the natural grade. The floor of the largest pad is raised about 5.5 feet above the natural grade. The project requires 800 cubic yards of cut and 500 cubic yards of fill. The design of the proposed residence substantiallyfollows the General Design Guidelines, Hillside Design Guidelines, and their associated Development Standards. The proposed home is of a modified Mediterranean architectural style The structure and variation in pitch and form of the tiled roof breaks up overall massing. All elevations are well articulated, and wall planes have been treated using a variety of elements such as turrets, columns, recessed fenestration, and balustrades. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee 'discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect: Gradin Per section 17.24 060 A. of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, structures should be located in such a way as to minimize necessary grading and to preserve natural features. The primary issue is whether the proposed project substantially meets the intent of the Hillside Development Ordinance. The major concern is the quantityof earthwork, comprised of 800 cubic yards of cut and 500 cubic yards of fill. In contrastto conventional °flat pad° design, staff believes the proposed house meets the guidelines of the Hillside Development Ordinance by reducing earthwork quantities through the use of multiple stepped building pads that permit the house to follow the natural terrain. Also, the effects of grading have been minimized through contouring of slopes and use of variable gradients to soften their appearance. 2. Design: The house is primarily atwo-story structure with two single-story features on the northern and western wings. The house also has atucked-under, side-loading garage. The house fits well within the 30-foot hillside building envelope, except for one chimney. Since the design incorporates raised floors on most of the pads, skirt walls will be visible on the west (right) elevation. Should the Committee believe that the recessed wall planes and decorative treatment do not adequately break up the vertical wall planes on that elevation, staff requests direction in resolving this issue. EXHIBIT H ~-i~ DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2005-00343 -THOMAS HUNSUCKER September 6, 2005 Page 2 Secondary Issues: Once all of the maior issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary dgsign issues: A Conceptual Landscape Plan should be provided for staff review priorto review of the project by the Planning Commission. The plan should provide a high degree of erosion control by use of appropriate plant materials to bind the sod. Policy Issues: The fotlowmg items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: Grade land and landscape in workable increments to avoid exposing vast expanses of bared earth at any given time to minimize sod erosion. Establish propersoil management techniques to reduce the adverse effects (i.e. erosion) of grading. 2. In hillside areas, development is to be designed to preserve open spaces, protect natural features, and offer views to residents. 3. Round off and contour all graded slopes to blend with the existing terrain, and present a more natural appearance. 4. Minimize disruption of existing natural features, such as trees and other significant vegetation, natural ground forms, rock outcroppings, water, and views. 5. Select plant materials for their suitability to the environment and compatibility with Xeriscape prinaples (i e. water conservation). Include existing mature tress worthyof preservation rn the landscape concept. 6. Select fast growing vegetative ground covers for filUcut slope areas to retard soil erosion. Significant landscaping is regwred for downslope elevations. Slopes that require landscaping shall be planted with informal clusters of trees and shrubs to soften and vary the slope plan. Jute netting is required. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proiect with the above listed conditions. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: McPhail, Coleman Staff Planner: Rozalynne Thompson The Committee recommended approval of the protect. N_~/ RESOLUTION NO.05-98 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2005-00343, A REQUEST TO DEVELOP A 2-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE W ITH A TOTAL FLOOR AREA OF ABOUT 5,705 SQUARE FEET ON .48 ACRE OF VACANT LAND, IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (.1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 182 FEET EAST OF THE INTERSECTION BETWEEN LAREDO PLACE AND REALES STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 1061-801-25 A. Recitals. 1. Thomas Hunsucker filed an application for the approval of Hillside Design Review DRC2005-00343 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter ih this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as °the application.' 2. On the 12th day of October, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. . NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on October 12, 2005, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located approximately 182 feet east of the intersection between Laredo Place and Reales Street with a street frontage of 92 feet and lot depth of 233 feet; and b. The subject property slopes from north to south with an elevation of 2,265 feet on the north side and an elevation of 2,231 feet on the south side; and c. The properties to the east, south, and north are vacant properties. The propertyto the west is developed with asingle-family residence; and d. The applicant proposes to construct a 2-story single-family residence of about 5,705 square feet. The total lot coverage is 24.5 percent; and e. The proposed residence is designed with a minimum of four stepped pads that have a total elevation change of 16 feet over the natural grade; and ~~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0.05-98 DRC2005-00343-THOMAS HUNSUCKER October 12, 2005 Page 2 f. The detached garage will be located 52 feet from the north property line. It will be cut into the hillside and will have a finished surface elevation of 2,250 feet. The depth of excavation or °cut° that will be required to construct the detached garage will vary between 3.5 feet at its frontto 7 feet at its rear; and g. Excavations on the remainder of the property will be limited to 5 feet or less, with the applicant proposing to export 800 cubic yards of sod from the site; and h. The proposed development is consistent with single-family development in the area; and i. The proposed residence meets the intent and guidelines of the Hillside Development Regulations. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and • c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially incurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. The Commission herebyfinds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the regwrements of the California Environmental QualityAct of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15303(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subcect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planninc Department: 1) Approval is for the construction of a 5,705 square foot single-family residence, located approximately 182 feet east of Laredo Place and Reales Street. 2) Detailed Landscape and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted at the time of plan check to the Planning Department for review and approval. A minimum of 30 percent of the landscape material shall be large size (minimum 24-inch box size trees, 10-gallon shrubs) within the front yard and visible portions of the side yard in order to create a mature appearance. The City Planner mupst approve the detailed landscape ~"~ d PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-98 DRC2005-00343-THOMAS HUNSUCKER . October 12, 2005 Page 3 and irrigation plans prior to the issuance of bwlding permits. Front yard landscaping shall be installed prior to release of occupancy. 3) Sloped banks 5 feet or greater in vertical height with 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at a minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. In addition, meandering and varying slopes shall be created to eliminate unstable or unnatural appearing conditions. 4) In addition to the vegetation required by the Hillside Ordinance, extensive ground cover plantings will be required on the front slope to provide erosion control to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 5) Any walls in the 42-foot front yard setback, as measured from curb face, shall be limited to 3 feet in height. 6) The retaining walls exposed to public view and return walls are to be decoratroe masonry and compatible with the architectural style. 7) Any revisions to the Grading Plan, including changes in the quantities or depth of cuUfill, will require the review and approval by the Grading Review Committee and Planning Commission. 8) Round off and contour all graded slopes to blend with the existing terrain and present a natural appearance. Eng ineering Department: 1) The drainage runoff from this developed site shall not adversely affect the existing homes/lots adiacent and southerly of this site. 2) Rewse the existing public street improvement plans, City Drawing No. 847 to show the new drive approach location. Remove and replace the existing curb and gutter and existing sidewalk at the existing drive approach location to be abandoned. Also, show on the public improvement plans any existing street trees, proposed new street trees, and existing trees to be removed, if any. On the Title Sheetfill in the street tree table and construction notes as required by the City Engineer. a) The back of the sidewalk for the proposed drive approach on Reales Street will also be the high point for the driveway. This being the case, then the maximum driveway slope for the first 6-feet adiacent to the sidewalk is 6 percent. b) Provide a typical street section for Reales Street. Parkway shall slope at 2 percent from the top of the curb to 1 foot behind the sidewalk along the whole street frontage. Join to on-site grading with 2:1 maximum slope. • c) Provide additional street trees per City Standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. ~9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-98 DRC2005-00343-THOMAS HUNSUCKER October 12, 2005 Page 4 3) Protect all existing street improvements in place or replace them to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; including but not limited to, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, street trees, drive approach, etc. 4) Protect all existing private drainage equestrian easement improvements or replace. The property owner shall maintain the trail and drainage devices within the trail in good working order. Maintain all private drainage and equestrian easements along the south property line, 15-feet wide (7.5-feet on-site). Show, label, and provide the proposed grading concept for the drainage/equestrian easement. Show the cross-section, cross slope, existmg/proposed gutters, orv-ditch where applicable. Adequate provisions shall be made for conveyance and disposal of surface drainage entering and exiting the drainage easement. These improvements shall be made as a condition of the development, not as future improvements. 5) Per the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Non-Category Projects are required to submit a W QMP; complete and submit for review by the City the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). Best Management Practices (BMP) and the Operations & Maintenance (O&M) therein should be attached to the signed Owner Certification sheet 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2005. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST: Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on 12th day of October 2005, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: • • ~ ao COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2005-00343 SUBJECT: HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE APPLICANT: THOMAS HUNSUCKER LOCATION: REALESSTREET-APN:1061-801-25 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: omoletion Date General Requirements 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, rts J~ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the aftematrve, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, ds agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, ds agents, officers, or employees maybe regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at ds sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. OS-98, Standard ~~ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the constructioNgrading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Archdect. B. Tlme Limits 1. DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if bwlding permits are not issued orapproved ~~ use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include ~~ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Hillside Development Regulations. r~ 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions ~~_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. SG7-05 ~ ~-ai Protect No DRC2005-00343 Completion Date 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Bulding Code and ~~_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety • Department to show compliance. The bwldings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be J~- submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ~___/ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all ~~ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. 8. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequatey screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 9. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, J~ including proper illumination. 10. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, Penang, and weed J~ control, to accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review ~ and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including Penang and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. a. Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot corral area in the rear yard. Grade access from corral to trail ~_/ with a maximum slope of 5.1 and a minimum width of 10 feet. 11. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter If a double wall ~~ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter 12. Construct block walls between homes (i a ,along interior side and rear property lines), rather than ~~ wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 13 Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood ~~_ gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street. ___J~ ~~ SG-1-OS 2 ~-aa Project No DRC2005-00343 E. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborisYs recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 3. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5'1 or greater slope, but less than 2.1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 4. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area l-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2.1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 5. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 6. Front yard and comer side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be requred per the Development Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the regwred street trees and slope planting. 7. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Department. 8. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. F. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of building permits. _~ Comolehon Date ~J ~J ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ J~ SC-1-OS ~a3 Protect No DRC2005-00343 Completion Dete APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) G. H. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans Including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single Ilne diagrams, f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, Including isometrics, underground diagrams, waterand waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Protect Number (i e., DRC2005-00343) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a Bolls report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and °wet° signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i.e., DRC2005-00343). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Caldornia Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations In effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to Issuance of building permits for a new residential protect or mator addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may Include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit Issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Bulding and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. For protects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the Issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. L ~J ~J- ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ SGt-OS ~-4a~ Protect No DRC2005-00343 Completion Date J. K. 5. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m, and 6 30 a.m Monday ~~ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 6 Construct trash enclosure(s) per Cary Standard (available at the Planning Department's public ~~ counter) New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property Ime clearances ~___/ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provde compltance with the California Bulding Code for requred occupancy separations. ~~ 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturefs °htgh wind° instructions. ~~_ 4. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, m accordance with CBC ~___/_ Section 1505. 5. Provide draft stops in attics to line with common walls. ~___/ 6. Openings to exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. ~J 7. If the area of habitable space above the first floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the ~_J construction type shall be V-1 Hour minimum. 8. Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same bwlding shall be not less than 1-hour ~_/ fire-resistive construction. Grading 1. Grading of the subtect property shall be m accordance with California Bwlding Code, CAyGrading -_J~1- Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved gradmg plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualifted engineer licensed by the State of Califomta to ~_/_ perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the ~_J time of appttcation for gradmg plan check. 4. The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, ~~ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of bwldmg permits. 5. In hillside areas, residential developments shall be graded and constructed consistent with the ~_/ standards contained in the Hillside Development Regulations Section 17.24.070. 6. A separate gradmg plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for ~~ existing bwldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Caltfomta registered Ctwl Engineer. Security Hardware 1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors, ~~ 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are wRhin _/~ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 3. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking dewces. -_/~_ SC-1-05 was Protect No DRC2005-00343 Completion Date L. Windows 1. All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted ~~~ from frame or track in any manner M. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime _J~ vtstbdRy. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING x CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED i SC-,-05 ~-~~ Rancho Cucamonga Community - Development Building & Safety SFR TRACT STANDARD CONDITIONS May 18, 2005 Thomas Hunsucker Reales St DRC2005-00343 NOTE: Any revisions may void these requirements and necessitate additional review. A. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistive construction. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's °high wind° instructions. B. General Requirements 1. Submit five conceptual sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan b. Floor Plan c. Foundation Plan d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of serwce entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams. f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning. g. Planning Department Tracking Number (i.e., DRC2005-00343, etc.) must be clearly noted on the Title Sheet of the plans. h. Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls. i. All sheets must be marked: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. /~ a ~ Page 1 of 3 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City pnor to permit issuance. 4. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Division staff for information and submittal requirements. C. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., DRC2003-00110 and SUBTPMi6125). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Califomia Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Budding and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Bwldmg and Safety Division pnor to permit issuance. 3. The Building and Safety Official shall provide the street addresses after tracUparcel map recordation and pnor to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 5:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. D. Gradin Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final Grading Plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved Grading Plan. 2. A sods report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final Grading Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official pnor to the issuance of bwlding permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Ciwl Engineer. ~--a~ Page 2 of 3 Note on title sheet that plans must be submitted for plan check and be approved pnor to construction. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Califorrna Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Division if you have any questions about the procedure at 909-477- 2710. u ~~~ Page 3 of 3 ~_,,r,„~ Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection - District ..~,,. Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS September 21, 2005 Thomas Hunsucker Reales -Hillside Review DRC2005-00343 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-2 Fire Ftow 1. The regwred fire flow for this protect is 2250 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire Distract Ordinances. For structures in excess of 3,600 square feet use CFC Table A-III-A. 2. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site. Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 2. Address: Note on the plans that prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. x--30 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP AGENDA Rnrrceo CUCAMONGA OCTOBER 12, 2005 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Chairman Stewart _ Vice Chairman Maaas Fletcher _ McPhail _ McNiel II. NEW BUSINESS A PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2005-00820-KAMM REALTY, INC -Review of conceptual plans for development of 127 townhome units on 9 63 net acres of land in the Mixed Use land use area, located at northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Street - APN 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44, and 45 III. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda ' ~ IV.- ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commrssion has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m adloumment time If rtems go beyond that time, they shall be heard only wdh the consent of the Commission 1, Lois J Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 6, at least 72 hours poor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Crv~c Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamon rf-'-G G" • ~IleC:i`~'e~111~!1~"(~11'7il i ~~.~! ~. ~i°t~~l . ~ ... .(i~~ : ~f..R n .rr. ~i%fra re(K 3T~f•1u -~ i„~ .: i""I"~"l~ fib' - ~ - ~ Vicinity Map Planning Commission Workshop • October 12, 2005 ~~~~ • * Meeting Location• Rancho Cucamonga City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~• N City of Rancho Cucamonga _~ d O ~5,,. .,~ . ~:~=~ ~y: . .:~ 5. ~`r F +a t '~ 4 ~. M,.,r. ~, i~ ~{{)5A.~Sx.~s@@,', r4 ,M'MN~ ~ !_ /^ ~ ~/~ ~ / ^ ^ \ a ~B~~Y.M~1~. V V ~ ~ ; ~r~ a~,•~".n O o ~x. `~~ °~~ a ~ ~ n o D O O ~ ~ ~ ~ r-- Northeast Corner Foothill Blvd. & Grove Ave Rancho Cucamonga, California Planning Pre-Application Submittal September, 2005 Cpy OF RANCHO CUCAN10NGA SEP 15 2005 RECENED -PLANNING Applccant Kamm Realty, Inc. 16661 Ventura Blvd , #712 Encino, Cahfomia 9136 Tel (818) 325-8840 Fax (818) 906-9859 Jason Kamm, President Property The site ~s approximately 10 acres at the northeast corner of Foothill and Grove at the border of Rancho Cucamonga and Upland It is currently largely vacant land used as a strawberry farm wrth 3 single family residences owned by the San Antonio Community Hospital Page 2 of 13 View across Site to the North from Red Hdl Country Club Dnve Page 3 of 13 View of Site along Red Hill Country Club Dnve and Foothill (at far left side) ~ ~~~ ~ fl ~ Imo' 4 r~ "• ~ ~, r I _ __ r r , .' ~~ i' View Southerly along Grove side of Srte ,~,~ i '~ : 4 , i ~o+ a ~.~ ~ e--~ ~°~~~" +~d~~ I I r ~ ' ~ ~'-n -x~ i _ ,~ _ _ ~ ~ ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~_. _ N _ , _~ ~ _ _ `z` / .~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ -.~~' ~ r ~ _ _ _ 1° 'tea ~_t~J _ _- __ __ __ ab View Northerly along Grove side of Srte Page 4 of 13 I~Ya l~^ «ek` +E ~ k e°j =~ ~. View of Rear of Srte (from Grove looking East -Upland single family homes behind trees on the lefr) '4 . .tea .m ._._~- __-~_____~ -°~9.h -- - _ y4 ''~Y ~ View of Eastern property line adjacent to Red Hill Country Club Page 5 of 13 Adjacent Uses Page 6 of 13 View of Srte from Red Hill Country Club (Eastern boundary of Site) View from Country Club to Northeast corner property Lne of Site ~~ I „1^_ ~ ' ~ ~_ • ~ - ~ ,f - - .a _ ~ . i _~_~ View to the Northern property hne and one of the 4 single family homes m Upland -~/~ _~ . - I ~' ~1 }, , -: `s~, i~r.r ~ . ,.. ° x~ -- - - Retail Center aC Northwest corner of Foothill & Grove (City of Upland) Page 7 of 13 .r- ., 4 I, -='_-_- ___:.s _ _~., Gas Station at Footlull & Red Hill Country Club Drwe Page 8 of l3 Picture of retail at Southwest corner of Foothill & Grove looking across Fooilvll (m Upland) Planning Process to Date • Met with planning staff and engineering staff to discuss goals for the site as well as potenpal constraints • Toured a number of ex~snng housing projects m Rancho Cucamonga at the d~recnon of the Planning Staff • Had Grubb & Elhs review the potential for retail or office development on the site Toured ex~snng retail and office sites m the area Proposed Development • Desired to develop ahigh-quality development consistent wnh medium residential zoning (allows 8-14 units per acre) under the Bear Gulch Specific Plan and compatible with adjacent land uses. The proposed project is 12.6 amts per gross acre and 13.2 units per net acre and is proposed to be developed in accordance with the City's Optional Development Standards. Provide Signiticant Project Amenities o Two Tot Lots o Addmonal open spaces and walk streets o A clubhouse with latchen, bathrooms, and muln-purpose room o BBQ area and patio o Pool and Spa • Need to provide City monument at corner of Foothill & Grove. o Space provided for monument o Clubhouse building at corner that can provide azchuectura] elements that can be designed to work with the City's architectural themes Proposed exterior wall would be "tied into" the building breaking up the visual from Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue • Provide guest parking in excess of code. 0 83 spaces are provided on street and m pocket parking, which ~s 2 6 limes the code required guest parking of 32 spaces Pazking is distributed throughout the site • Provide effective ways to deal with the 20 feet of elevation change from the rear of the site to the front along Foothill while providing nice streetscapes. o Use of "tuck under" units These amts will be two story on one side and either face the street or other two story units on a walk street The three story elements will be off the motor courts • Good internal streetscapes with maximization of design elements. Wanted to minimize the view of garage doors from main street. o Three different budding types - 1 story on grade wnh yards, two story on grade and "tuck- under" 2 5 story o Have provided walk streets and many units facing [he mom street wnh front porches and entrances The project ~s designed to provide pedestrian access throughout the site 0 2 Story on grade townhomes contemplated design ~s similar to DR Horton's Strathmore 0 2 ~/z story "tuck under" townhomes contemplated design is smular to Tuscany Villas Page 9 of 13 Examples of similar design Page 10 of 13 View of Strathmore Building with adjacent open space View of Front of Strathmore Townhome Building along Entrance 5a == Bi r ~ 4 ~/ r ~ t fi ~ s ~_~, ~ ~~ ~ '~ ,~ .',~ ~ _ -. .a- , r - ,- _ - ~ °. ~. .1 ~ j 1 I . , s '!; '_1 ._ .,___. .,_...... .Z View of Strathmore mtenor walk streets Page t f of l3 Strathmore Motor Courts t A ,y ~ r ^ ~-a! 6th ..,,. ,... e..... e..~. .... vlrnw aua.nean n ,~ - Y1 C: J~ ~ ~ ) •~~_'~~ ~.~~ .'rte. uovnsvum ., .. wnrwm TUSGV~ .II us ,,, my~n. AT lermw t ...r... ./A I..r..t• ..... w~rfc•~e.~a r` ~ ,9~, ~ lit w ~"' d _ 1~ >ff>s ~ , -l 1~ p'.t i- Y~~` vt. .... w. na e.n. ¢u. alt6[.nnL w«. ~[ mma..,ma ~ . ...... ..... ...,_ "., e.... TUSCAVA \II IAS ~..~~.. AT REUIIILL n.w_ ~. -i ~ ec:Cvr'~~~..~~ Approved elevations for Tuscany Villas "tuck under" product Page 12 of 13 ,_ Initial Conceptual Site Plan ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ' ~ '~ ~~= ~~ _ - ~ ~, o a _~ ~~~~ ~, ~~ .yes .t o ~~ ~ ~s, o~ Page 13 of l3 Planning Commission Meeting of ~U ~ Z ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN-UP SHEET Please print your name, address, and city and indicate the item you have spoken regarding Thank you NAME ADDRESS CITY ITEM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35