Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2005/10/26 - Agenda Packet
n u ~~ • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA CR~oN~, OCTOBER 26, 2005 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Chairman Stewart_ Vice Chairman Maaas _ Fletcher _ McNiel_ McPhad_ II. ANNOUNCEMENTS Presentation of Resolution of Commendation to Brad Buller for his Dedicated Service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga as City Planner III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES September 28, 2005 Adjourned Meeting October 12, 2005 Regular Meeting October 12, 2005 Adjourned Meeting IV. CONSENT CALENDAR' The following Consent Calendar~tems are expected to be routine and non-controversial They wtll be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion If anyone has concern over any dem, it should be removed for d~scuss~on A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00438 - J T STORM - A review of 22 single-family residences m conjunction with previously approved Tentative Tract SUBTT16716, on 14 1 acres in the Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue south of Victoria Street APN - 0227-121-16 This project has been determined to be within the scope of Mitigated Negative Declaration that was adopted by the Planrnng Commission on July 28, 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA OCTOBER 26, 2005 RANCHO 2 G'UCAMONGA V. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following dems are pubDc heanngs in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related prolect Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by staling your name and address All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each prolect Please sign in after speaking B APPEAL OF CITY PLANNER'S DENIAL OF MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW - DRC2005-00242 - NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS -A request to co-locate on an existing Southern California Edison tower north of Foothill Boulevard and west of Day Creek Boulevard on land zoned Open Space -APN 0227-053-30 (Continued from September 28, 2005) This item has been withdrawn by the applicant - no action will be taken. C TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17063- WF CONSTRUCTION, INC - A request to subdivide 1 27 acre into two parcels in conjunction with an industrial project in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3), located at 9359 Feron Boulevard -APN 0209-032-12 This prolect is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Gwdelines Section 15315 (Minor Land Divisions) Related File Development Review DRC2005-00013 D ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16926 -ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, INC - A request to subdivide 18 27 acres into 9 parcels in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 12), locatetl between Richmond Place, Buffalo Avenue, and fronts along 4th Street -APN 0229-263-49 thru 53 Related File Development Review DRC2004-01013 This prolect has been determined to be within the scope of a Mitigated Negative Declaration that was adopted by the Planning Commission on September 28, 2005 E ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00699 -THE RANCH GROUP - A request for a land use amendment from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) in connection with a proposal for a master plan for 79 single-family residential lots on 18 6 acres, located at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 6th Street -APN 0210-062-08 Related File• Development District Amendment DRC2004-00700 F ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2004-00700 -THE RANCH GROUP - A request to change the Development District Map designation from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 18 6 acres at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 6th Street - APN 0210-062-08 Related Files General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00699 CJ • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA OCTOBER 26, 2005 ct~ oNOn 3 VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS Thts is the time and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda VII. COMMISSION BUSINESS VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commtss~on has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m ad/oumment hme If hems go beyond that hme, they shall ba heard only with the consent of the Comm~ss~on THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL ADJOURN TO A WORKSHOP IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING TO DISCUSS PRE- APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2005-00877 -PAUL HOFER 1, Lois J Schrader, Planning Commtssion Secretary of the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 20, 2005, at least 72 hours pnorto the meeting perGovemment Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Cenfer Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga /--c6 If you need speaal assistance or accommodations to partiapate m this meeting, please contact the Planning Division at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours pnor to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable artangements to ® ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired Vicinity Map Planning Commission October 26, 2005 • ,~~`~ ~~ *' Meeting Location Rancho Cucamonga City Hall 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~• N City of Rancho Cucamonga T H E C I T Y O F R A N C U O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE October 26, 2005 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Dan Coleman, Acting Clty Planner BY Emily Cameron, Associate Planner SUBJECT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2005-00438 - J T STORM - A review of 22 single-family residences In conjunction with previously approved Tentative Tract SUBTT16716 on 14 1 acres in the Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue south of Victoria Street - APN 0227-121-16 This project has been determined to be within the scope of Mitigated Negative Declaration • that was adopted by the Planning Commission on July 28, 2004 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Densitv 1 66 dwelling units per acre B Surroundmo Land Use and Zonma North -Etiwanda Intermediate School South - Etiwanda Railway Station East -Vineyard and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West -Etiwanda Avenue C General Plan DesianaUons Project Site -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North -Etiwanda Intermediate School South - Etiwanda Railway Station East -Low Residential West -Etiwanda Avenue D Slte Characteristics The project site is located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue south of Etiwanda Intermediate School The site is predominately a vacant parcel with a slope of 2 percent Located on-site are walnut trees and Eucalyptus windrows aligning the north, east, and southern property lines To the south is the historic landmark Etiwanda Railway Station property To the east is a vineyard • ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00438 - J T STORM DEVELOPMENT October 26, 2005 • Page 2 ANALYSIS General The applicant is requesting a design review of 22 single-family homes located within the Etiwanda Speafic Plan, with homes ranging from 3,686 square feet to 4,863 square feet Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16716 was originally approved July 28, 2004 Lots B and C, located on the frontage of Etiwanda Avenue, have been leased to Ftlippi Winery for planting vineyards to be maintained by the winery The surrounding properties include Etiwanda Intermediate School to the north, a small vineyard to the east, Etiwanda Railway Station to the south and Etiwanda Avenue to the west The Etiwanda Railway Station property is being leased by the City for a signature trailhead for the Pacific Electnc Inland Empue Trail There is an adjoining two-story home at northwest corner of the tract The applicant is proposing Mediterranean themed architecture for all six elevations The elevation styles include Italianate, Spanish Colonial, two separate Tuscan elevations, and two single-story plans All elevations include a large amount of custom detail such as the oversized entry doors at the front courtyard areas, garage doors, and side yard Penang A total of four tots are single-story, Lots 1, 4, 13, and 14, placed on the corners of the tract A Desion Review Committee The Committee (McPhail, Coleman) reviewed the protect on September 6, 2005, and determined that 3 of the elevations needed to be revised to provide additional rock work, Tuscan themed windows, and balconies to incorporate additional rural architectural detail The revised elevations were then reviewed by staff and forwarded to the Planning Commission • B Environmental Assessment An Environmental Review was completed with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16716 and the original Development Review for this site and approved by the Planning Commission on July 28, 2004 The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been adopted, no further environmental review is required for subsequent projects within the scope of the Mitigated Negative Declaration RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Design Review DRC2 8 through a adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions R pe ully su mitt , Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner DC EC/ge Attachments Exhibit A -Location/Site Utilization Map Exhibit B -Tentative Tract Map Exhibit C -Grading Plan Exhibit D -Elevations and Floor Plans Exhibit E -Design Review Committee Action Comments dated September 6, 2005 • Exhibit F -Landscape Plan Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2005-00438 ~a azvz-ezue YO YONOXVJOJ ONDNYe "O1~ °~n 1 BB°B X08 0 d wV°"4u,ms:.w~$ d~ A ~ 7'17 '.LN3Wd073A3Q W21015 .L f 91191 'ON I.7Ye1. 3ALLgNdL NVId NOLLYlflllfl d1S a v~ 91L91118f19 ~F fi ! ~ i ~ I ;' 1j E~ ~ i ~ 111 ! PeB~ ~;1 ~°I 6° !1 1 ~~! orti ~t91:! 161;; i61ii 61°!~ ~ :1~ ~ii ii ~ ~ ~ii1i ~~~ F® - i~ ~ p ~ ~J <0~~;l1' az>~ < tali aaa o F z C, llil ~ a a d i i 9(s; ~F pp ' ~ ~= ~~ q x t ~: 94 ~ F c ~ ~ ~ 9 9 ° f=i ',w 1 ~~ N; l ~ ~„ 4 6 e li F zo a ~ z ~ W F n5 O T C'7 i G C": C C7 n 0 z c> 1 D p ~xlnib i~- ~ w x N 2 1~ ~_ ~ a y~ yQpy O ~ `i k N ~~ N 3 ~,~~~~ ~ahG ~ ~ffi~( V 1tl ~ 8`s~ .., ~ ~ O o i Z € ~~ • w~~~ Q ~ ~~~ ~~~ $ $ `~g~ :_ u L Y C o O~Z v~+ y~ ~40 M •~ h=0 9T ~Qa G ert ~~ ~ ~ ~ €~I tg~ ~ ~ ~ ~@ ® ® ® ® e d B7 )r Yl0 1 1 (w w.nNW ~~ gg 4 ~~~ ° ~ $ ®p :} en E 9 ~ p ~~E ~ Q~'4~Q k~e f ~ ° E Guuuuuui a ei97f {~ gg ~ ~ ppp K x Y~ f e Fcq p@ly 9 a ~i • ~~~~~ ~ 8~¢1pQ '9a PGgg :ee a ;dig m t: ~ ~~ ~~ y~9 Q9 9QQQ9 Eib° ~ " ~ ~ '~ .gyp ~[ a~~Ta p ~ ~ ~p ~ $ g$ ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ e a; p !~p $~a~yi4 ~4~i9 8 ~~' ~ tQ~~ ~ e a ~~ :A _9~e94 t@T%$ g • o (N .If~wl Slww 1x01Y1M ) lw Iljrmm Nl 4r4G•YM K)ICI _ _ !r_ -rte (wnl()/P~tO ~- ~- ~ o"Yll I; y~~ 1 II )ovm[NUUln avuaxw I I~11 ` x .I q I ~~ ~Td 1- ,~-~f 1 IR .4 ` I n 4 11 I4p Ipp y [. ~)raln NMLLW 1 yF4R~ ~~ ] ~~® •~ 4 11 ~~ m°Co ~~aI}c„a ' (G'A14U ~~, IIIKI ({Y ).){mm M) Y•mNmN -}1 1 SAR h Z~~~ II - av n- r;~''H-'IR 111 y ~Q ' ~~----~-- ---_ - ili 's I ~I 1 I ~ ~„ ~I 1 ~ h l i 1 a ~ I I ~~ ~ I I n I I g rv I P ,W„ I I T ~~ I~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ ~ I - H s .m)-~ ~ I I~ I e ~ - I 1 _ I I I~~I~ ~ I ~~I ~ ~~ 1~1~gg1~ W~ ~~' ~ II ~1~ I d l I ? I I ' (W 3wK.mm x) IIG WI ~ ( ~)YJa // IY] Kmm IU ' ~~~~~~"" fTFr ~,~Zrx~,wl ~ 1 i ~ i I ,,---~- -~H;I I I i, s Is IIB I it 5 ~ I c Y I ~I e ~ I e Ic e n I ] I I yl ~ 'J ~ I .F I I ~, I a 6 I e Ie e' ~ ` 5 Lm. a ~ ., i ~_ ~~I IR I ~ I W I ~e~ ~ a I' h i 1 c ry`I I1 .~ E ~ I r, ~ I FI I t l __ _ ~ e 11 11 ~--1Y-g1 yll/PW IS YM ~ ~ I ¢y p I y~ - - Ir's~-- r~~ I I s}a2 b$ I II_ k SIE 88 I I Q@~ ~ ~`~ p 3 a `2 1 1 1 `kI~`i ` la o Ill mil I y~Ns I °G~ 1 (u.tcNm/~-9 --_ IY aarc xmr .lsmoav -- ~ ~ - ~~E.tl ,rrin nma Z mxr Z Dr~"IiairiU _. ~))misai ~ ~- - T`y (u.cr)nl rew 4__ ~ ~I ravwsase+tl ]]smnw _-..-• _I7 tuiu)1 Y -f<r ]I ~ut1-- ~rpr rMau3,o3 ra iKmmW)-fu'LSwm.'1 hwJ SNlYwNY) a-r ~r a) sun m fl~ s97 €~4 mmII --~'',,~~~~ ~ a~~ ti 2 ~ ti ~~ yUz "' V h U ~ h ~ dd ~ ~ 1 gg n E a ~ ~ ~ R00 n ffa 3~~ s ~~~ i Ix -5a §~g ~~ C ~~~ ~_ 3~ r ate. e q~ 7 5 i ,~ .S '~ . R ~Y i~ ~~ S IFS ~~', Zd. ~._. B ~ 4 p ~-•• 8 ~~~$ ~~!d Yr~9 ~~ e a ~'~ E~,~ ~~ ~~ s ~ ~~~~~ ~~:s~ ~S~ ~ ~Ei~ 4 , ~ ~ ~ ~55 ~ ~ e h~~~4~ga ~S 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S e ~R ec g~E: ea~ ~ `-~~1~rceu n~ , u. ~ I I ~,'~ 3 ~ ~Sa~ ~ ~ l ~~ ~ U b U U 2 U ~. o ~ U y. 999 _; q_ _ _ _ _ _ _~ z~ __ ,_ __ Q p~p= 9Y R~ i3 ~ 3 3 3 3 '~3 kE 33 3 3w 3~ 3 ;,g ga ~ „ @ @ g as aa se @ 8g ~s a y. gs __ _ _ _ 3 _ 4 _ _ ,_ __ g~g e~p ^~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~y^ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~EB ~B & 8 F 6 8 8 8~~ 68 8 6 6EB E ~ R 9 ~Q E ~`~a ~ M I{ ~~~ Q ~ yi, 6 ~~~~ a ~ B~ ~{~ .pwe 4p'~ ~~a~3~~ ~~Il~;~ ~@~p~~i~ ~- ~ qI s i ~~ ! ~ ~J i- 5y ~~ ~ i ei t Y J 1 r 1 1 1 ,I mss w ux Jf e99 ~ ~~ ,~~Jy 1 p~S ~~ ° ~ b a~ ~ &-l~ p1 ¢g4Qbp$~d e ~ ~ e FI 2 V yid ~ G Q a ~ ~ t ~ ~~ ~ U ~u ~ N t I ~ Fll3MfrS ~-3_S i s ~, k 1 _ r IA I „ - ~ _ ~ I a - ; -~ n1 1 I - 1~ ~ ~~ ~ ry ~ I II '~ s I I \ i ~ I ~ I I ~ I e s II ~ I t _~ f~l ~~ ~ ;\~ a ~e ro ~~ o ~ i s I I ~o v „ v ~i' ~ v~ I I , ~ 2~2 o -W I I \ i, \ i I I/ ~ ~~ ~ 11 I ~ ~ C- ~ ~. ~ ~ I~I ~ ~ ~ 8~ yl ~ ~~' ~ ~ \ M \ \~ N n ~ + Y\ o \.p ~ l I I 0 11 w ~m e~ j I I a+3% 11 ~ i I R 11- ~-- ~I~ ))',\\\ '1 ~x,S) 7 ~ `i. h ~ I 1 ~ \ •~ M \~ c\ V ~ ~ ~ I I~ a\ ~ ' n 1 n ~ 9 ` I v g u ` \ s' \ i ~` l e I 1 \*~ ` \ I I gal ` I~ + ~ ~ ~ ~~ '~~ ~ ~ I ~~ \ -1 a _~_ ~ - - ? to _i - _~_ d orh rs ri -~'-~~-;-~.r- ail h -111 1 .. I / ~, R 6 \ I l \ I) -_ ~FB+ 12 YIII / + ~ ~ # fi Bt H / 9/ / - F ~rl' S -i lI$ ? !~~ i J 3 / / Y I/ ~ j ~+I 111\Il ~a ;-u fir'-- i ' ~_ _ _° ~ 19> ~ -~ ~c ~.' .mil i~~\ i' ~ ~ ~~ 113 i~~ON~ rl ~ 11 Bf'MO-SOOZbO Oxr 9~[9iuens t t t ewua3s cwrnzo eea r wrt ~c~ []N 531OY 6101 LOl LL SSOdO S.'YU' Y BZYI SWL Asr u~m ercn ~om~v.~n~l~~ti ~m s'~~u~e •wa YIN7lQfl7YJ 90 91YJS 'ON(09YN99B NYS 90 .I/.NUO.~ 'Y9NONYJl17 OX.~NYN d0 .[.LL7 9N.1 N! 9 I ~ 9 T 'ON .L3 [~?LL BALL [~.Lt~I,~.L Nt/7d JIVIObT~J 7t//i[d3~N0~ Li3J HI TY'J5 • • • ~~l v W 0 e w a w g a r W J Q Q J W F ~ n NZ LL ZJ~LL jivQ Na~ ZQ NWW ~ W~av Z~z o ~~~ i wQ -~-- s: 1~~ -p PLAN 1 THE VILLAS AT MONTE SAN SAVINO J.T. STORM DEVELOPMENT, LLC. ETIWANDA AVENUE -TRACT 16716 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I K TEn a A. WS M~. {4rE+y 1 ~~ RIGHT ELEYATTON A REAR ELEVATION A LEFT ELEVATION A _~ PLAN 1 THE VILLAS AT MQNTE SAN SAVINO J.T. STORM DEVELOPMENT, LLC. ETIWANDA AVENUE -TRACT 16716 • RANCHO CU~ONGA, CALIFORNIA K T 8 Ass 6 RIGHT ELEVA1TOlY g REAR ~L$VATION B ' I1I L-J PLAN 2 • THE VILLAS AT s""E'"'°'""'°" MOIVTE SAN SA1/lNQ J_T_ STORM OE1lE LOPMEN T, LLC ETIWANAA AV ENU~~T11RACT 76776 Brea ' - T- RANCHO CUCAMONOPL (CALIFORNIA " ~' - ELEVATION A ELEVATION B RIGHT ELEVATION A Y ~ ~~ LEFT ELEVATION A PLAN 2 THE VILLAS AT MONTE SAN SAVINO s~,..~; ..~~-- „-0•~ J.T. STORM DEVELOPMENT, LLC. ETIWANDA AVENUE -TRACT 16716 • RANCHO CU~ONGA, CALIFORNIA K TTEP 8 ;~... a ~ ~~ REAR ELEVATION A n U vv vv ov vn "~ • FRONT ELEVATION B PLAN 3 THE VILLAS AT • MONTE SAN SAVINO RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA MONTE SAN SAVINO, LLC. -- ~~ FRONT ELEVATION A FRONT ELEVATION C db[~ m 8 F y~ I y f O [E~ C'^ z 0 Q a H ~I~ 0 ~/1 ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~o ~ ~ ~5 z "H z z~ o a ~~~~~~ ~' W W U vl '~ W N N cc O ~~ ~~ ~ j ~~~ ~ ~ ~ mm g PLAN 3 THE VILLAS AT MONTE SAN SAVINO RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA MONTE SAN SAVINO, LLC. • ~ ~o.,~...}~., i PLAN 3 THE VILLAS AT MONTE SAN SAVINO RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA MONTE SAN SAVINO, LLC. PLAN 4 THE VILLAS AT MONTE SAN SAVINO RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA MONTE SAN SAVINO, LLC. p' I O • FNONT ELEVATION A FNONT ELEVATION 6 FNONT ELEVATION O arcar$tsaA~oP PLAN +~ THE VILLAS AT MOIVTE SAN SAVINO ~.T. STQRM DEVELOPMENT, LYJC. ETIWANAA AVENUE -TRACT 16716 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA K TTE~ AEAASI.$VXTIOP A O xttaas s i.EFr E>$vAixorr a PLAN 4 THE VILLAS AT MQNTE SAN SAVING d~-~ *»-.,•4. J.T. STORM bEVELOPMENT, LLC. ETIWANDAAVENUE-TRAGT16T16 ,eR RANCHQ ipl~ffiA, CALII+4RNIA S~ Q Il ~Il RI011T C PLAN 4 THE VILLAS AT MONTE SAN SAVINO RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA MONTE SAN SAVINO, LLC. ,.~,. Vie. a....»,... a d W x N ~ oa ~~o ~~~ ~ ~ o ~' ~~~ w]W zoo 0 ~~ ~ ~ n U to a= ~ :a • LEFT ~ A FRONT ELEVATION A ~> ~~ ~ =a :~ ~ as ~. CASITA THE VILLAS AT • MONTE SAN 5AVIN0 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA MONTE SAN SAVING, LLC. /-_ RRONT A REAR A CASRAS -_ _ SOUARE FOOTAGE rat now ~+ wn CASRA a~ ffi~ LEFT B ~ ~~ ~ RIONT B REAR B CASITA THE VILLAS AT MONTE SAN SAVINO RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA MONTE SAN SAVINO, LLC. „..,, ~,y..~,... • CABRA FRONT ELEVATION B CASRA FNONT ELEVATION C pIGNT C AEAN C CASITA THE VILLAS AT • MONTE SAN SAVINO RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA MONTE SAN SAVINO, LLC. ,~.,, ~.yq.~,,..,... t..=:.:: ~_ :.: _______ ::r n U PLAN 1 THE VILLAS PLAN 1 SOUARE FOOTAGE NIfT ILOM ]fM N11 pPT CIMf Nf N11 TOTLL ffN N M OIIIIY 1 W N A OIIIIYf f IN N A AT MONTE SAN SAVING . RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA MONTE SAN SAVING, LLC. ,a.,, ~~ .n,.a..,... v~Aw s_ -_ 60UARE FOOTAfiE AI~T 0.081 INS N ~ TOT.LL iTY N ~ p4NY! 1 00 N 11 yll~-Y= OM N~ PLAN 2 THE VILLAS AT MONTE SAN SAVINO . RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA MONTE SAN SAVINO, LLC. _N, ~-a~~~..~,N. dlcR anR T7. o' ~h~~ lrRp! 3'i~ I - '~ i~~ FLAR a SOU~RE FOOT~OE Hirt naa~ >fa N n flCOln Rndl 1NY N II TOTY RffO Nn GIMIRll flfl! !ff NA OLRRi 1 RY N n nfR1i f Nf N n PLAN 3 THE VILLAS AT MONTE SAN SAVINO RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA • MONTE SAN SAVINO, LLC. ,_.,, ~ ~.n,.»,.N ~oFT ..~. • CASITA PLAN 3 THE VILLAS AT MONTE SAN SAVING RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA MONTE SAN SAVING, LLC. ,...v ~a~ o.n...~.. PLAN 8 60UARE FOOTAGE MCOIO MW IMO N 11 iOTLL MM M 11 ' ~ a : n o~i a + . s ou~M ~ w. r n OPT CASITA nTwx~ • ULAN ~ 60UANE FOOTAGE rwrt noon zm Y n f[COID 80011 >fM Y n TOTM NW Nn OMID• f f ~ N n OIT CIfR1 fM N n p1C11111110[f11I1 IH Yn PLAN 4 THE VILLAS AT MONTE SAN SAVING . RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA MONTE SAN SAVING, LLC. __ ,».,, ~1~R.,~.,,.,... r~ u PLAN 1 SOUAEE FOOTAGE R\R R0011 f[[I N ~ [KCi RO011 [!N N 11 TOTN 1W NA 0[11111 [M N11 011111[ [1[ N11 oarTrsulwla[ wre 1a :[ n PLAN 4 THE VILLAS AT MONTE SAN SAVING • RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA MONTE SAN SAVING, LLC. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7 50 p.m. Emily Cameron September 6, 2005 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2005-00438 - J T STORM - A design of 22 single-family residences in contunction with previously approved Tentative Tract SUBTT16716 on 14 1 acres of land in the Low Residential Distract of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan, located on the east side of East Avenue south of Victoria Street-APN: 0227-121-16 Desion Parameters The applicant is requesting design review of 22single-family homes located in the Etiwanda Specific Plan with lot sizes ranging from 14,007 to 16,428 square feet. The tract map (Tentative Tract SUBTT16716) was originally approved July 28, 2004 Lots B and C have been leased to Fdippi Winery with the dedication of vineyards which will be maintained by the Winery. Surrounding properties include Etiwanda Intermediate School to the north, a small vineyard to the east, Etiwanda Railway Station to the south and Etiwanda Avenue to the west The Etiwanda Railway Station property has been leased by the City for a signature tradhead for the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail. The applicant is proposing Mediterranean themed architecture for all six elevations Elevations styles include Italianate, Spanish Colonial, two separate Tuscan elevations, and two single-story plans All elevations include a large amount of custom detail such as the oversized entry doors at • the front courtyard areas, custom garage doors, and custom side yard fencing Large amounts of rock work, (which emulates aged fieldstone and wraps the side of Plan 2) and details such as copulas, exposed rafter tails, and wrought iron accents are proposed. A total of four lots are single-story, Lots 1, 4, 13, and 14 placed on the corners of the tract This totals 18 percent single-story product According to the Etiwanda Speafic Plan, .. "the integrated theme selected shall reflect the traditional architectural styles found in Etiwanda including, but not limited to (a) Victorian, (b) California Bungalow, (c) California Ranch (d) Any other integrated design style which in the opinion of the Design Review Committee meets the intent of this article." Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project 1 The Etiwanda Speafic Plan recommends that any protect located in this area incorporate a rural agricultural theme, with details such as fieldstone, large porches, ranch style columns, and siding The applicant has proposed a Mediterranean theme, that ~f approved may set a precedentforthe Tuscan themed architecture in the Etiwanda area Although the elevations are impressive, the Design Review Committee shall determine whether the design of the homes is ideal for this location The developer is proposing all homes with a similar theme The Tuscan style theme is not typical in the Etiwanda area Historically, the City has approved architectural styles such as Ranch, Bungalow, and Craftsman, which include rural architectural detail This regwrement relies on "Encouraging the use of traditional construction materials, • such as native stone, brick, timber, wood siding, tile, and others as may be appropriate" (Etiwanda Speafic Plan, Part I, Chapter 3, pg 3-4) DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2005-00438 - J T STORM • September 6, 2005 Page 2 Secondary Issues• Once all of the maior issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. Landscaping within any new development as a portion of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan should emphasize use of native trees, shrubs, and wtldflowers Integrate these features into front yard landscape The front yard landscaping should incorporate the required one tree per front yard area, and additional trees required as replacement trees (at a 1 1 ratio), berming or mounding (minimum 18 inches high), and native wildflowers, and low growing ground cover 2 If the Committee agrees with the proposed elevations, additional detail will be regwred on the rear and side elevations, speafically, on Plan 3A Italianate (rear and right elevations), Plan 2A Spanish Colonial (left elevation), and Plan 2B (left elevation) The developer should incorporate additional detail along the gable ends of the single-story elevations for ail styles (i a rock work stucco insets) Policy Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion. 1. The use of fieldstone as a maior design element is strongly encouraged in the Etiwanda Speafic Plan. The themed entry, including the walls should incorporate native fieldstone to match similar surrounding developments • 2 The developer was required at the time of tract map approval to provide a 10-foot average landscape buffer on the north and south sides of the property The landscaping shall incorporate large mature vegetation with the use of a rural landscape palette 3 The onginal Tree Removal Permit was approved with SUBTT16716 m 2004 Replacement trees shall be at a 1 1 ratio and replaced m accordance with the Etiwanda Speafic Plan Sections 5 41 400 and 500 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine whether or not the architecture is appropnate Design Review Committee Action. Members Present McPhail, Coleman Staff Planner Emily Cameron The Committee recommended approval subtect to revising Plan 3B (Scheme 4C) and Plan 4C (Scheme 3D) to be more rustic, traditional, and less formal The Committee directed the applicantto work with staff on the revisions prior to Planning Commission • V~3~ ;. i y -- .~4~ ~ • I~~ ~~ 8 ._, \ • RESOLUTION NO.05-99 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00438 FOR 22 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN• 0227-121-16. A Rentals. 1. J.T. Storm Development fled an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2005-00438, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application.° 2 On the 26th day of October 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning • Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows• 1. This Commission hereby specifically fords that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on October 26, 2005, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located on the east side on Etiwanda Avenue between Etiwanda Intermediate School and the Historic Landmark Etiwanda Railway Station, approximately 660 feet south of Victoria Avenue, with a street frontage of approximately 368 feet, and lot depth of 1,318 feet, and is presently vacant; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is Etiwanda Intermediate School, to the northwest is atwo-story house, to the south is the Historic Etiwanda Railway Station properly, to the east is a vineyard and a single-family residence, and to the west is Etiwanda Avenue, and c The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity, and d The applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting on February 23, 2004, to inform the surrounding neighborhood residents of the proposed project and to obtain feedback, and . e The application contemplates a private gated community of 22single-family homes on previously approved lots and a vineyard planted along the Etiwanda Avenue frontage to a depth of approximately 160 feet, and x-35 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-99 DRC 2005-00438 - J T STORM DEVELOPMENT October 26, 2005 Page 2 • f. The related Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16716 was approved by this Commission on July 28, 2004. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed protect is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan, and b. The proposed use is m accord with the obtectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. The proposed use is m compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements m the vicirnty. 4. An Environmental Review was completed with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16716 for this site and approved by the Planning Commission on July 28, 2004. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been adopted, no further environmental review is required for subsequent protects within the scope of the • Mitigated Negative Declaration. The proposed protect of 22single-family residences is within the scope of the prior Mitigated Negative Declaration. Based upon the facts and information contained m the prior Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with written and oral staff reports, the Planning Commission finds that there are no substantial changes in the protect or the site and its surrounding conditions, that would require revision to the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. All environmental mitigation measures from the previously approved tract and development review shall apply to this protect 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) All conditions of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16716 shall apply. 2) The Etiwanda themed entry, including the walls, should incorporate native fieldstone to match similar surrounding developments 3) The original Tree Removal Permit was approved with SUBTT16716 in 2004 Replacement trees shall be at a 1 1 ratio and replaced in accordance with the Etiwanda Specific Plan Sections 5 41 400 and 500 4) The northern property boundary wall shall be constructed of split face block facing south (the subtect property) and smooth tan CMU block • facing north (Etiwanda Intermediate School) The entire length of the block wall is regwred to provide a decorative trim cap with an overhang ~3~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-99 DRC 2005-00438 - J.T. STORM DEVELOPMENT October 26, 2005 • Page 3 5) The developer shall work with the property owner to the east to provide one continuous boundary on the property line The wall shall be agreed upon by the adtoining owners. 6) The vineyards shall be planted prior to occupancy release of the last home. The construction details for the vineyards shall be included in the Detailed Landscape and Irrigation plans regwred prior to issuance of Building Permits. Engineering Department 1) Etiwanda Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with "Collector Residential° and Etiwanda Specific Plan standards including, but not limited to, the following a) Provide cobble curb and gutter, sidewalk, street trees, and asphalt pavement, per Figure 5-24 of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan. b) Provide 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlights, as required c) No driveways shall be constructed on Etiwanda Avenue frontage. d) Provide traffic striping and signage, as required 2) Frontage improvements along Etiwanda Avenue shall be provided for the "Not A Part° parcel to the north. 3) The frontage along Etiwanda Avenue for Lots A, B, and C are required to look like front yards and shall be privately maintained. 4) The emergency fire access and any landscaping in the parkway within the access area are subtect to the approval of the Fire District. Provide limited access curb per City Standard Drawing No. 105-C. 5) Proposed internal street improvements to be in accordance with "Local Residential" standards including, but not limited to, the following a) Provide curb and gutter, drive approaches, sidewalk, street trees, drainage facilities, and asphalt pavement, as required b) Provide 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlights, as required. c) Provide traffic striping and signage, as regwred. d) If curb adjacent sidewalk ~s proposed, demonstrate ADA compliance for the sidewalk crossing drive approaches and the • sidewalk access ramps at street crossings e) If a mountable curb is proposed in lieu of drive approaches, provide a special design Standard Drawing 105-C is not adequate for daily use by vehicles ~~ 7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-99 DRC 2005-00438-J.T. STORM DEVELOPMENT October 26, 2005 Page 4 • 6) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the prolect side of Etiwanda Avenue shall be undergrounded along the entire prolect frontage, extending to the first pole off-site (north and south), prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing Etiwanda Avenue shall be undergrounded at the same time The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 7) Construct Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Area 8 Master Plan and local storm drain facilities (Line XV-1 b) from the sublect site to the existing 84-inch storm drain line (Line XV-1) in East Avenue, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of permanent master plan facilities (typically serving at least 80 ac), in accordance with City policy The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover over sizing costs, in excess of fees, from future development within the same tributary area If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. a) Because the sublect tract is a privately gated community, the interior storm drains shall be privately maintained to the connection with Lme XV-1 b 8) All street parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to 1-foot beyond the sidewalk along all street frontages. Join the street parkways to the lot grading at a maximum 2 1 slope 9) Entrance to the proposed tract shall be designed per the City's Gated Entrance Design Guide Environmental Mitigation All environmental mitigation measures for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16716 adopted by Planning Commission Resolution No 04-95 shall apply • ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0.05-99 DRC 2005-00438 - J.T. STORM DEVELOPMENT October 26, 2005 • Page 5 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2005. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY. Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST: Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and • adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of October 2005, by the following vote-to-wit AYES. COMMISSIONERS NOES: COMMISSIONERS' ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS. 3q STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2005-00438 SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW OF 22 HOMES APPLICANT: J.T. STORM DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: EAST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE SOUTH OF VICTORIA - APN 0227-121-16 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Comolehon Date A. General Requirements . 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its ~ /_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relingwsh such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 05-99, Standard ~~_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not requred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. B. Time Limits 1 Development/Design Review approval shall expue if bwlding permits are not issued or approved ~~_ use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/ /_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan SC-1-OS ~ 1" I I Project No DRC2005-00438 Completion Date 2 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and ~_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be • submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The bwidings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 3. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/~_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits. 4. Ail site, grading, landscape, urigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ~~_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 5 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all ~~_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 6. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, ail trash pick-up shall be for rndivdual units with ~~_ all receptacles shielded from public view 7. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be ~~ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 8. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the ~-J- adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map • 9 All bwlding numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination ~~_ 10 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the ~~_ Homeowners' Association are subfect to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 11 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property ~~_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of bulding permits. 12 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall ~~ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter 13 Construct block walls between homes (i a ,along interior side and rear property lines), rather than ~~_ wood fencing far permanence, durability, and design consistency 14 Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood ~~_ gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC • 15 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry ~_/_ SC-1-OS - 2 ~- `~ I Prgect No DRC2005.00438 Comolehon Date D. E. F. 16 On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk The ~~_ 5-foot walVfence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and urigation in addition to the requred street trees Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for City Planner • review and approval prior to issuance of building permits The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provde each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance regwrement, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property 17 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured ~~_ products Building Design 1 All dwellings shalt have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, ~~_ detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner revew and approval prior to issuance of building permits 2. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or ~_J_ projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adfacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in bwlding plans. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street ~~_ 2 Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho ~~_ Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of bwlding permits • For residential development, private gated entrances shall provde adequate turn-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in ~~_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Existing trees regwred to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in ~~_ accordance with the Murnapal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods 3. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 ~~_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than S feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater _!_J_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in • staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy SC-1-OS ^ _ r ,, s I/ lyi'E'~ Project No DriC2005-00438 Completion Date 5 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously • maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each indiwdual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 6 Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be requued per the Etiwanda Specific Plan This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 7. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be requred by the Engineering Department 8 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is regwred along Etiwanda Avenue. 9 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the Homeowners Association 10. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department. G. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require • separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs H. Environmental Mitigation measures are required for the protect. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $ 495 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions regwred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit I. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner revew and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits • _~~- ~~_ ~~- Y ~~~ ~~- _~~_ ~~- ~_/- SC-1-OS 4~3 Protect No DRC2005-00438 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) SEE ATTACHED. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline). 44 total feet on Etlwanda Avenue K. 2. An irrevocable offer of dedication for roadway purposes shall be made for the private streets 3. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 4 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map 5 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City Street Improvements Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source oT energy, fuel or power to any building service egwpment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit Is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted bythe Clty Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development 2 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to SVeet Name Curb& Gutter AC. Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights SVeet Trees Comm Trell Median Island Bike Trail Other Etlwanda Avenue (e) X X (f) X X Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item. (e) Cobble curb and gutter (f) Limited access curb for emergency access Improvement Plans and Construction a. Street Improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to LJ ~~ ~~- ___/~- ~~- _/.~- ~~- ~~ • ~~_ -/~- • SC-1-OS 5 ,/I , I i1 Project No DRC2005-00438 Completion Date final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first • b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits requred c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal condwt with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect caving. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specfied by the City Engineer. 2) Condwt shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. C~ 5 I ~ U f Existing Cary roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours dunng construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for review and approval bythe City Engineer Prior to any work being performed on the private streets, fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits requred Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program ~~- _/~. ~~- ~~- ~~- _/~_ ~~- ~-~- J~_ SC-1-OS ~~ 6 Protect No DRC2005-00438 Completion Date 6 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street Improvement plans Street Improvement plans shall include a Ilne Item within the constructlon legend stating °Street trees shall be Installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typlcally sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation In those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The Clty Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Spaee Spacing Slze Oty Etlwanda Avenue Eucalyptus Red Gum 8' 30' O C 15-Gal Ftll camadulensis In constructlon Notes for Street Trees- ' FIII-in quantity on plans 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic Bolls report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public Improvement plans only Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have Imes of sight plotted as required. L. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer M. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the Ciry Engineer prior to final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surtace drainage entering the property from adfacent areas 3 Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk 4 Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street, and provisions made to pass through walls N. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CiVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the -J_/. C~ ~~- • J~- ~~. ~~_ ~~- ~~_ ~-/- ~~~ ~~- SC-1-OS ~' I 7 y Prgect No DRC2005-00438 Comolehon Date Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from • the CVW D is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days pnor to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any regwrements that may be received from them. O. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid pnor to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved 2. Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs far all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or pnortc building permit issuance if no map is involved 3 Pnorto the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administratNe fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable rf at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Bwlding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect. ~PPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: P. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 3. Ail garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices Q. Windows All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted from frame or track in any manner R. Building Numbering Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • SEE ATTACHED ~-~- ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~_ ~~- ~~- ~~- _/_J- SC-1-OS ~~ B Rancho Cucamonga Community Development .,; Building & Safety SFR TRACT STANDARD CONDITIONS June 7, 2005 JT Storm Development TRACT 16716 E/S Etiwanda Ave at Saddle Ridge DRC2005-00438 & SUBTT16716 NOTE: Any revisions may void these requirements an~ necessitate additional review. A. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistive construction 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. B. General Requirements • 1 Submit five conceptual sets of plans including the following: a Site/Plot Plan b. Floor Plan c Foundation Plan d. Ceding and Roof Framing Plan e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams. f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air condiUomng. g Planning Division Tracking Number (i e , DRC2005-00438, etc) must be clearly noted on the Title Sheet of the plans h. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls i. All sheets must be marked NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils • report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal. ~}~ g Page 1 of 2 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation • coverage to the City pnor to permit issuance. 4 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Division staff for information and submittal regwrements C. Site Development Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i.e , DRC2003-00110 and SUBTPM16125). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or mator addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Bwldmg and Safety Division pnor to permit issuance., 3. The Building and Safety Official shall provde the street addresses after tracUparcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction actroity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6.30 a m. Monday • through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays D. Grading 1. Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final Grading Plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved Grading Plan 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4. The final Grading Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Bwldmg and Safety Official prior to the issuance of bwlding permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Calrfornia registered Civil Engineer. • Note on title sheet that plans must be submitted for plan check and be approved prior to construction. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations m effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division if you have any questions about the procedure at 909-477-2710 ~~ Page 2 of 2 ,~ ~.. Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Fire Construction Services ~ STANDARD CONDITIONS July 28, 2005 JT Storm Development TRACT 16716 E/S Etiwanda Ave at Saddle Ridge DRC2005-00438 & SUBTTi 6716 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Design gwdelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential protects is 500-feet. No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet. • b. Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways. u. At mtersecbons. ni. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. iv. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. v. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any bwlding. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The requred fire flow for this protect is 2,000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the required fire flow subtect to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide regwred fire flow 3 Firewater plans are regwred for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 4 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed. protect site ~~ FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable ~tandards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in• 1. All structures that do not meet Fire District access requrements (see Fire Access). 2. When regwred fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure. 3. Provide on-site fire flow to prove 2,000 gpm at 20psi. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access - Fire Lanes Standard 9-7. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are. a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. b. Turf block is not permitted for the emergency only access approach. If materials other then concrete are proposed please contact Fire Construction Services for approval before installation. The maximum inside turn radws shall be 20-feet. • d The minimum outside turn radius shall be 46-feet. e The minimum radws for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet f. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. g At any pnvate entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side h. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. i. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12 percent. I Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). k. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 2 Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1 The following design requirements apply a. All automatic gates shall be provided with a Fire District approved, compatible traffic pre-emption device The devices shall be digital Analog devices are not acceptable Devices shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and specifications • b Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch c The key switch shall be located outside and immediately adjacent to the gate for use in the event that the traffic pre-emption device fails to operate __d A traffic loop device must be installed to allo~ exitini from the complex e. The gate shall remain m the open position for not less than 20-minutes and shall automatically reset. 3. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the• architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 4 Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire Distrct vehicle access and water supply from a public or pnvate water main system before construction FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fue Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method° form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation 1. Reciprocal Access Agreement: The plan as submitted indicate that the requred Fire Department access: a. Is located on property which is not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property Ime; or • c. Is shared by multiple owners; or d. Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire District. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, bwlding or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire District approval The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino To assist Fire Construction Services in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal• a The current title reports to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties included m the agreement b. The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subfect to the agreement c A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn radn and slope of roadway surface shall be provided. The access roadway shall comply with the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 2 Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement. The plans as submitted indicate that a required privat~ fire mains or appurtenances a. Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant; or b Crosses a property line, or ~~ja. 3 c Provide service to adtacent properties, or d. Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association, or e. Is shared by multiple owners. Please prowde a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the private water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection equipment essential to the water supply The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract. The agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, pnor to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Commurnty Facilities Distract #85-1 or #88-1 is regwred prior to the issuance of grading or bwlding permits. hronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Condit PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire Distract Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distract Standards. Approval of the on-site (pnvate) fire underground and water plans is regwred prior to any bwlding permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with • RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4. The Bwlding & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services wdl perform plan checks and inspections. 2. All pnvate on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard #9-8 4. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 5. Construction Access• The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the firnshed surface of the road. 6 Fire Flow• A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCW D and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services •7. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" ~~ 4 PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamong~ Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, th markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants. For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fve hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the regwred fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3 Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services. 5. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services 6. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, speafy the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the regwred annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 7. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with. mirnmum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street. When bwlding setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry 8. Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject bwlding or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. • ~5`~ 5 • ;~. 1~~~ T H E C I T Y O F R A N G II O C U C A M O N G A Staff IZ,epol't DATE October 26, 2005 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Dan Coleman, Acting Clty Planner BY Vance Pomeroy, Contract Planner SUBJECT APPEAL OF CITY PLANNER'S DENIAL OF MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW - DRC2005-00242 - NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS - A REQUEST TO CO-LOCATE ON AN EXISTING SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON TOWER NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND WEST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD ON LAND ZONED OPEN SPACE - APN 0227-053-30 (CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 28, 2005) Application withdrawn - no action required by Planning Commission. On September 28, 2005, the applicant requested to have this Item continued until the October 26, 2005, Planning Commisslon to give them an opportunity to pursue an alternate location for this facility The applicant has subsequently requested to withdraw the appeal and allow the City Planner denial to stand The applicant understands that, according to Sec 17 06 020 G Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, "Following the denial of a Minor Development Review application, no application for the same or substantially the same protect design on the same or substantially the same site shall be filed within one year from the date of denial " R e Ily subm ed, G Dan Coleman Acting City Planner DC VP/ge Attachments Exhibit A - Nextel Letter of Withdrawal ITEM 6 310 Commerce Irvine, CA 92602-1300 FAX 260-846-2610 • Phone: 714-448-2752 October 18, 2005 Dan Coleman City Plarmer for Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE• DRC2005-00242 -SCE Lattice Tower at Foothill Blvd East of Rochester Ave. (CA7142K) Deaz Mr. Coleman Please let this letter serve as notice of my withdrawing my appeal for the above mentioned protect Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 714-448-2752 • Thank you for your rime Regazds, SIGNATURE ON FILE Claudia Mueller Leasmg/Planrung Manager Cc• Vance Pomeroy, File • EXHIBIT A ~a T H E C I T Y O f RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE October 26, 2005 TO• Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner BY Douglas Fenn, MPA, Associate Planner SUBJECT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17063 - WF CONSTRUCTION, INC - A request to subdivide 1 27 acre into two parcels in conjunction with an industrial project in the General Industnal District (Subarea 3), located at 9359 Feron Boulevard - APN 0229-032-12 This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 (Minor Land Divisions) Related File Development Review DRC2005-00013 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Industrial Buildings -General Industrial Distract (Subarea 3) South - Existing flood control channel and the A T and S F Railroad -General Industrial District (Subarea 3) East - Industrial buildings -General Industrial District (Subarea 3) West - Industrial Buildings and vacant land -General Industrial District (Subarea 3) B General Plan Designations Project Site - General Industrial North - General industrial South - General Industrial East - Generallndustrial West - Generallndustrial C Site Characteristics The subject site is an industrial infiil property located at the terminus intersection of Onyx Avenue and Feron Boulevard Onyx Avenue and industrial buildings are to the north, an existing flood control channel and the A T and S F /Metrolink Railroad line to the south, an existing industrial building is to the east, and vacant land and an industrial building are to the west The site is vacant with partial asphalt improvements The site has a slope of less than 2 • percent and has a north to south fall There are no mature trees on the subject site ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM17063 - WF Construction, INC October 26, 2005 Page 2 ANALYSIS A General/Background On September 26, 2005, the Acting City Planner approved (City Planner Approval Letter) two industnal bwldings on the subtect site Earlier in the review process there were some minor easement issues that have since been resolved and the parcel map is ready for Commission review The proposed subdivision is for financing purposes The proposed parcel map complies with the regulations of the Subdivision Map Act, of 2005, and the City's subdivision ordinance B Design Review Committee The Design Review Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Coleman) reviewed the parcel map and protect on July 19 and on September 6, 2005 The Committee was pleased that the applicant had addressed the outstanding mator and minor issues from the first Design Review meeting The Committee recommended approval subtect to working out the remaining issues with staff C Technical and Grading Review Committee The map and protect was reviewed by the Committees on July 19, 2005, and was approved by both Committees All issues have been addressed and are included in the Standard Conditions of Approval and in the attached Resolution of Approval • D Environmental Assessment This protect is categorically exempt form the regwrements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Gwdelines Section 15315 (Minor Land Divisions) CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site No correspondence has been received RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that SUBTPM17063 through the adoption of the attached Resp(~ubmitted ((/ he Planning Commission approve Parcel Map Resolution of Approval Dan Coleman Acting City Planner DC DF/bt Attachments Exhibit A - Site Utilization Map Exhibit B - Design Review Comments dated July 19 and September 6, 2005 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map17063 r1 ca h q~ J qh co ~.~ 0~~~ I~ a `~ a Z ~. f1 ~gs Q ~9G ~~I J :g@b Y • U 4~@ ~1 r ~~~~ I ~; ~ I t~l1 la ~r~~~~~~ ~;I q~;¢IISI~ !~ 1®®s E 1 Ih a 1 r !I~ r ~ 1:1 I !II it ~~~ it 1 ~~ ea I { ~ a 1 i t -; ' g < ~ ~ ~ ~ ,; . ~~7 111131 I R l i ~ 1 =~ I 4 ahl. , °I~1;1111~11lI X11 li~ill ~11 ~t q~ ~ :' Y : Ij ~, ~ ~ ~ W ; ~ ' ffi ~ ~h8atd55g6~~i,~rg~tl,iE~lg~'~lt,~111EE16ei~li~~llt~t:l~ ~ : t_ ~ ~ ~ j• i 'i 3 a° t~ „N„ZZ ntaaalaleeee.eaab:uArelar~lliv~.e+6i1•::::: ~ 1 ~ v ' 1 a l ~ 1 W ~1 1~ e 111 ! 111 t li= ~~ii~ IB ~~ 61~~ ~~ olll '~~ M p , $ 8 ., ~ A \\\ \Y IlNagag a i ~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~ Y~~I Cg~ ~ ;~ 1 ( ~~~g~~i&~ I Efl3 ~@k'Ib@adw~ ~ ~ils1~ e~~~~~ g ~~ ~~ ~ ~,e 1 ; ~ I'I III ~I!E~ ~,~ ~I~ ~I~I~ ~I~I~ a~4 ~ ~ e 3 ~'~ ~' ~ ~, s` ~~ ~ i DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8 00 p m Doug Fenn July 19, 2005 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00013 - WF CONSTRUCTION, INC - A request to build 2 industrial/warehouse buildings totaling 21,650 square feet on 1 27 acre in the Industrial District (Subarea 3), located at 9359 Feron Boulevard - APN: 0229-032-12 -Related File Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17063. Design Parameters The subject site is an industrial infill property located at the terminus intersection of Onyx Avenue and Feron Boulevard Onyx Avenue and industrial buildings are to the north, an existing flood control channel and the A T and S F Railroad line to the south; an existing industrial budding is to the east; and vacant land and an industrial bwlding are to the west. The site is vacant with partial asphalt improvements The site has a slope of less than 2 percent and has a north to south fall There are no mature trees on the subject site The infill industrial development contains two single-story industrial bwldings with mezzanines, which total 21,650 square feet The bwldmgs are rectangular shaped, which is conducive for the intended use Three of out four sides have articulation, and only the service side of buildings is flat Access into the project site will be off of the terminus of Onyx Avenue and Feron Boulevard Additionally, the applicant has provided centralized and convenient outdoor eating areas for each bwlding The buildings have a nominal amount of 360-degree architectural elements The bwldmg designs • indicate an adequate use of two primary materials The buildings evoke a unique design that will be an improvement over some of the other existing buildings m the area Each budding will have a mixture of spandrel and vision glass with a foam trim type cornice over the window areas The primary entryways are recessed with a metal canopy overhang Easement Issue The easement notes on the lower left corner of the Parcel Map depict four easements However, three of the easements, which were for a pipeline, telephone line, and water pipes, cannot be located on any ALTA reports or any other recorded record The applicant notes that these easements will be vacated, but it is unclear at this time with the City of the proper procedure to do this Staff has no issue with the vacation, however, the intent is to verify with counsel from the Ciry's legal division as to best address this issue Because of this, the project was held up for a couple of days, and thus the late delivery of this project for the July 19, 2005, Design Review Committee meeting Project approval will be contingent upon vacation of these three easements, prior to issuance of grading permits Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project 1 Parking was calculated assuming both buildings would only be used for warehousing (one space per 1,000 square feet), excluding any manufacturing Manufacturing regwres twice as much parking (one space per 500 square feet of gross floor area). Staff has strongly • encouraged the applicant to consider providing more parking to be able to accommodate a broader range of tenants In staff's experience, small industrial buildings like these are typically occupied by manufacturing companies DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2005-00013 - W F CONSTRUCTION, INC • July 19, 2005 Page 2 Staff is concerned that the site is being overbwlt because of the lack of sufficient parking for manufacturing use, and numerous technical non-conformities with minimum Cary standards (see Code Issues below) One possible solution would be to attach buildings to create more efficient use of site Secondary Issues Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues Site Plan Parking spaces 14 through 17 may be underutilized between the two bwldmgs Although easy to get mto, they would regwre dnvers to back up and make an awkward three-point turn to get out of spaces. Further, they would also be blocked any time trucks are using the Bwidmg A roll-up doors Provide sidewalk connections from both buildings to both outdoor employee eating areas, including from Bwlding B access doors on the west elevation c. Landscaping should be provided around the trash enclosure of Building B, and Parking Space 21 will interfere with access to the trash enclosure • 2 Architecture a The rear elevation of Bwlding B, which is visible from the railroad, needs more architectural detail elements b The south side of Building B should have the decorative light sconce as deported on the other vertoral elements c The metal canopy detail that is utilized on the bwldmgs could be designed over the roll-up doors on the south side of Building B Additionally, the south side of the building must have spandrel glass to give the appearance of vision glazing d All of the entire vertical detail elements should be sandblasted e Call out the material of the decorative paving at all entryways into the project site f Parapets are to be high enough so as to screen all roof-mounted equipment Areas of the building do not appear to have sufficient parapet to screen any HVAC urnts g Transformers should be screened by decorative screen walls and landscaping h Bike racks should be installed on a concrete pad of sufficient size to accommodate the length of bicycles The plan shows both bike racks in the middle of planters • 1 A 25-foot average landscape setback is regwred along Feron Avenue The applicant does have additional landscaping along Feron Avenue that could be calculated as part of the average, but it is deficient The applicant has informed staff that they will have revised plans at the DRC meeting, whorh will rectify this matter C~ DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2005-00013 - W F CONSTRUCTION, INC July 19, 2005 . Page 3 2 Provide landscape planters, per the Development Code standard, around the bwldings except at the storage loading areas Planters are too narrow to plant trees required at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of bwlding Some planters along the east elevations are as narrow as 2 to 3 feet 3 Provide a minimum 5-foot wide (inside dimension) planter at the perimeter of the parking lot The west and south edges of the Bwlding B parking lot do not comply. 4 Parking Space #14 at the southwest corner of Bwldmg A does not meet the 11-foot minimum width requirement when abutting a bwlding wall Although, easy to get into, it would require driver to back up and make an awkward three-point turn to get out of space. Further, it would also be blocked completely any time trucks are using the adtoining roll-up door 5. The parking along the south property line must be at least 17 feet in length (allowing for a t-foot overhang) Policv Issues• The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion Paint roll-up doors to match the bwlding elevations 2 No exterior downspouts are to be visible on any of the bwldings • Staff Recommendation Staff recommends redesign of the protect and return to Committee. Design Review Committee Action Members Present Fletcher, Coleman Staff Planner Doug Fenn The applicant presented revised plans, however, they still did not resolve the issues The Committee did not recommend approval and directed the applicant to work with staff and return to the Committee • C~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 00 p m Doug Fenn September 6, 2005 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00013 - WF CONSTRUCTION, INC - A request to build two industrial/warehouse bwldings totaling 21,650 square feet on 1 27 acre in the Industnal District (Subarea 3), located at 9359 Feron Boulevard - APN 0229-032-12 Related File Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17063 PLANS WILL BE AVAILABLE AT THE MEETING Design Review Committee Action Members Present McPhail, Coleman Staff Planner Doug Fenn The Committee recommended approval subtect to improving the landscape palette • ~b~lgl~ g =~- c~ . RESOLUTION NO 05-101 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17063, A SUBDIVISION OF 1 27 ACRE INTO 2 PARCELS IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 3), LOCATED AT 9359 FERON BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0229-032-12 1 WF Construction Inc Development filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17063, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subtect Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 26th day of October 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said heanng on that date 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows • 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public hearing on October 26, 2005, including written and oral staff reports, togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to the property located at the terminus of Onyx Avenue and Feron Boulevard, and The application proposes the subdivision of 1 27 acres into 2 parcels, c The subdivision, together with the recommended conditions of approval, meets development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and b The design or improvements of the Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and . c The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and C~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-101 SUBTPM17063 - WF CONSTRUCTION, INC ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS INC October 26, 2005 Page 2 d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and The Tentative Parcel Map is not likely to cause senous public health problems, and f The design of the Tentative Parcel Map will not conflict with anyeasement acgwred by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivsion 4 This project is categorically exempt from the regwrements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 (Minor Land Divisions) 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall be prepared (or amended) to address such issues as Reciprocal ingress and egress, reciprocal parking, property maintenance standards and • landscaping standards, and adherence to the Urnform Sign Program, in orderto ensure coordinated long term maintenance of the project The CC&Rs shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission and the City Attorney prior to map recordation Engineenng Department 1) Feron Boulevard frontage improvements shall be in accordance with City "Secondary" standards as required and including a) Provide street trees, property line adjacent sidewalk and R26(s) "No Stopping" signs on Feron Boulevard frontage b) Reconstruct existing drive approach per City Standards The width shall be 35 feet minimum, commercial type, per City Standard 101 Type C c) Provide traffic striping and signage, as required 2) Revise City Drawing No 221 to reflect construction of the above public improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 3) If the proposed widths of the public drainage easements, located just west of the project boundary, are acceptable upon review of the final . drainage report, the Developer shall process a vacation of the old drainage easements C°~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO OS-101 SUBTPM17063 - WF CONSTRUCTION, INC ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS INC • October 26, 2005 Page 3 4) The final Parcel Map 17063 shall be approved and recorded prior to issuance of building permits 5) Submit a Water and Quality Management Plan that follows current WQMP templates/guidance and regulations set forth bythe Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Access the following website for an updated San Bernardino County Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for New Development and Redevelopment Protects http //www swrcb ca gov/rwgcb8/html/sb_wgmp html This site provides Gwdance and Templates that can be filled out electronically and punted Adhere to these guidelines and use the templates provided Also, include the Best Management Practices identified in the plan on grading plans when submitted for plan check 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2005 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of October 2005, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • C~V STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17063 SUBJECT: PARCEL MAP/INDUSTRIAL BUILDING APPLICANT: WF CONSTRUCTION, INCORPORATED LOCATION: TERMINUS OF FERON BOULEVARD & ONYX AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Comolehon Date• 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_I_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the altemahve, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of Tentative Tract No 17063 is granted subject to the approval of DEVELOPMENT _/_/_ REVIEW DRC2005-00013 3 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No OS-101, Standard _I_I_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits 1 This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning _I_I_ Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval • SC-1-OS 1 Cli Protect No SUBTPM77063 Comole6on Date •C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations 2 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bulding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 3 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of budding permd issuance D. Environmental Mitigation measures are required for the project The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be requred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $ 474 00 prior to the issuance of bulding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the Cityto retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions regwred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit ~PPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR OMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. E. Dedication and Vehicular Access Reaprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved Reaprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring toint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map F. Street Improvements Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Councl, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buldings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as regwred by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development SC-1-05 /_/_ / / / / / / / / / / / / C ~~, Protect No SUBTPM17063 Completion Date Construct the following perimeter street improvements Including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter A.C Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trad Median Island Blke Trell Other Feron Boulevard X X X Improvement Plans and Construction a Street Improvement plans, Including street trees, street lights, and Intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered CIVII Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the CIty Englneer and the CIty Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street Improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed In public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at Intersections for future traffic signals and Interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the CIty Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of Intersections per City Standards or as directed by the CIty Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage Flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be Installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the CIty Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be Installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program I / C~ / / / / / / / / • / / / / I / / / / I SC-1-05 CIJ Protect NO SUBTPM77063 5 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed • legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape Improvement plans The Clty Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Mm Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size ~ Feron Boulevard Pyrus caller yang NCN 3' 20' O C 16 gal "Aristocrat" Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soli amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only G. • H. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer Drainage and Flood Control A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be Installed as required by the City Engineer Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel Including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D Is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects • SC-1-05 Completion Date / / / / / / / / ! / I / C ~~I Protect No SUBTPM17063 Comolenon Date 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from • them J. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_/_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or priorto building permit issuance if no map is involved 2 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall _/_/_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first bulding permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • • sc-~-os C t5 ,~„~ . Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection • District Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS May 19, 2005 Feron Industrial Bwldings Feron & Onyx SUBTPM17063 & DRC2005-00013 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design gudelines for the spaang and location of fve hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial protects is • 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b The preferred locations for fire hydrants are At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways u At intersections ui On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv As regwred by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire Distract v A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any bwlding c If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or bulding, additional private or public fue hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fire flow shall be provided d Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of regwred fire flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow • 1 The requued fire flow for this protect is 3,000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances C ~~.P 2 The regwred minimum fire flow for this prolect, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 1,500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring This • requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 3 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed prolect may be used to provide the regwred fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide regwred fire flow 4 Fire protection water plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 5. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed prolect site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other • applicable standards requre an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in 1 Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet 2 Group "A" Occupancies 3 "E" Occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more persons 4. All structures that do not meet Fire District access regwrements (see Fire Access) 5 When required fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure 6 When the building access does not meet the requirements of the 2001 California Bwlding Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access - Fue Lane Standard #9-7 7 When any applicable code or standard regwres the structure to be sprinklered FSC-5 Fire Alarm System The California Bwlding Code, the RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code require a listed fire sprinkler monitoring Central Station Fire Alarm system Plan check approval and a bwlding permit are regwred Prior to the installation of the fire alarm system Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 • `~ FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private • roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Std #9-7 1 Location of Access All portions of the structures 1 s' story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the bwldmg Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24-feet c The mirnmum outside turn radds shall be 50-feet d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) I Trees and shrubs planted adfacent to the fve lane shall be kept trammed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 3 Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows a In bwldings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards b In bwldings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all requred openings 4 Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all regwred bwldmg exterior openings 5 Commeraal/Industrial Gates Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2 The following design regwrements apply 3 Clg a Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before plaang the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS b Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward c Gates may be motorized or manual d When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet e Manual gates must be egwpped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20 00 f. Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second g The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be egwpped with a manual override device and afail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction h Motorized gates shall be egwpped with a Knox override key switch The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are operation must be approved by the Fire multiple sensors may be regwred d~ configurations to be installed, the device, location and Chief prior to installation Bi-directional or ~e to complexity of the various entry Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or bwlding construction Plan check submittal is regwred with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is regwred prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property • Aerosol Products Magnesium Working • Application of Flammable Finishes Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Operation • Automobile Wrecking Yards Open Burning • Battery Systems Organic Coating • Candles and open flames in public assemblies Ovens 4 • C-~I 1~J • • Cellulose Nitrate • Compressed Gases • Cryogenics • Dry Cleaning Plants • Dust-Producing Processes and Operations • Explosive or Blasting Agents • Flammable and Combustible Ligwds • Frwt Ripening Plants • Hazardous Materials Supported Structures • High-Pile Combustible Storage (HPS) • Liquefied Petroleum Gases • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Bwldings Powder Coating Public Assembly Pyrotechrncal Special Effects Radioactive Materials Refrigeration Systems Repair Garages Rubbish Handling Operations Spraying or Dipping Operations Tents, Canopies and/or Air Tire Storage Welding and Cutting Operations Wood Products/Lumber Yards FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga If the factlity is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Bwlding & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from isswng a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure regwrements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility 2. Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is requred to submit a Plan, is also regwred to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of bwldings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Bwlding, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FSC-13 Alternate Method Application • Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review additional requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fve District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee ~a~ Please comply with the approved Alternate Method by providing a .4/3000 or an ESFR automatic fire sprinkler FCS-14 Map Recordation • 1. Reciprocal Access Agreement The plan as submitted indicate that the regwred Fire Department access a. Is shared by multiple owners, or b. Is located on common space under the control of an owner's assocation Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire District The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, bwlding or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire Distract approval The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, pnor to recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino. To assist Fire Construction Services in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal a The current title reports to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties included in the agreement b The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subject to the agreement c. A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn radn • and slope of roadway surface shall be provided The access roadway shall comply with the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 2 Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement The plans as submitted indicate that a regwred private fire mains or appurtenances a Provide service to adjacent properties, or b. Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association, or c Is shared by multiple owners Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the private water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection egwpment essential to the water supply The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District The agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or bwlding permits u 6 Ca- Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard • Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, speafications, flow test data and calculations for the prvate water main system for review and approval by the Fire Distract Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is regwred prior to any bwlding permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections 2 All prroate on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Public Water Supply (DomestidFire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of ail new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distract and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radws of the protect Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard • 4 All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 5 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 6 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services 7 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The bwlding construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: • 1 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Caa Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fve access road, at each hydrant location 2 Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler • contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the regwred fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3. Fire Sprinkler System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subfect to the release of power) 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or egwpment is placed in service 6 Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7 Access Control Gates Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 • or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services 8 Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services 9 The CC&R's, the reaprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the regwred annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways 10 Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercialhndustrial and multi-family bwldings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, wsible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the bwlding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non- illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be required on bwldings located on wide streets or bwlt with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial and industrial bwldings The swte designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites 11 Hazardous Materials Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire • Construction Services Ca3 12 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at • the subject budding or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 13. Mapping Site Plan Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'h" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and bwlding features as regwred in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector • r ~ LJ Cay T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: October 26, 2005 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commisslon ' FROM: Dan Coleman, Acting Clty Planner BY: Douglas Fenn, MPA, Associate Planner SUBJECT. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPMi6926 - ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, INC - A request to subdivide 18 27 acres Into 9 parcels In the Industrial Park District (Subarea 12), located between Richmond Place, Buffalo Avenue, and fronts along 4th Street - APN• 0229-263-49 thru 53. Related Flle: Development • Review DRC2004-01013. This protect has been determined to be within the scope of a Mitigated Negative Declaration that was adopted by the Planning Commisslon on September 28, 2005. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surroundino Land Use and Zonino: North - Industrial Buildings -Industrial Park District (Subarea 12) South - 4th Street and Clty of Ontario East - Existing Retail -Industrial Park District (Subarea 12) West - Hotel protect under construction -Industrial Park Dlstrlct (Subarea 12) B General Plan Designations: Protect Slte - Industrial Park North - Industrial Park South - 4th Street, Clty of Ontario East - Industrial Park West - Industrial Park C Site Characteristics• The site is surrounded by vacant land and industrial/office uses to the north and the Costco and Wicks furniture retail complex to the east across Buffalo Avenue. To the west, across Richmond Place Avenue, is the Tharaldson Hotel protect that is under construction with related restaurant and retail pad protect DRC2003-00770. To the south, across 4th Street, Is the Ontario Mills The street frontages of the site are fully improved with curb and gutter. The land • division is for financing purposes and is in conformance with City regulations. BACKGROUND• On September 28, 2005, the Planning Commission approved the development-related portion of a master planned retail protect. The proposed subdivision is for ITEM D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16926-ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS INC October 26, 2005 • Page 2 financing and maintenance purposes The proposed map complies with the regulations of the Subdivision Map Act of 2005 and the City's subdivision ordinance ANALYSIS A. Design Review Committee. The Design Review Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Coleman) reviewed the parcel map and protect on July 19, 2005. The Committee was pleased that the applicant had addressed the many mayor and minor issues. The Committee recommended approval subtect to working out the remaining issues with staff. B. Technical and Gradino Review Committee: The map and protect was reviewed by the Committees on July 19, 2005, and was approved by both Committees All issues have been addressed and are included in the attached Standard Conditions of Approval Resolution of Approval with Conditions C Environmental Assessment: On September 28, 2005, the Planning Commission adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the associated master planned retail development, which included the proposed parcel map. The Commissions adoption declared that impacts could have a significant adverse environmental impact on short-term air quality, cultural resources, geologic problems, noise, hydrology, and water quality. However, mitigation measures were regwred to reduce all impacts to a level of less-than-significant. CORRESPONDENCE. This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin • newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the protect site. No correspondence has been received. RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends that the Declaration of environmental impacts and approve the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. Planning Commission adopts a Mitigated Negative Parcel Map SUBTPM16926 through the adoption of Planner DC. DF/ge Attachments. Exhibit A -Site Utilization Map Exhibit B -Tentative Parcel Map Exhibit C -Design Review Comments dated May 31 and July 19, 2005 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16926 • ~a • • • ~~ ~6 12 ~~ I i1 -~ - CT' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DRC 200d-01013 `aesmeom SITE UTILIZATION PLAN ~-' ~ ®°"O ^ $UBTPM18928 ®A' Ale~ao0luul TIE SIGNATURE CENTER ~~ i(u1 es .u Iel~r" ww. ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'll~;(` ;--~ -_----~----_-~_ ~:~_ ---__-, ~ ,`~~~ ~'I'a: TENTATIVE PARCEL € ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ i~l'''I Ii ' _ `~ _ _ - ~ . ~ k~; U"~,,~ ~~..-'~' MAP No. 16926 N ~~I I '~ l ~ I I I1 PARCEL 14 OF PARCEL MAP ND 118]1 IN IHE GTY ' ~f I ~~ ~ ~ ~ /~i I i I^~ I i~ OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA COUNiY OF SAN BERNAROINO, a+r ^~ s' cur-~ 'I Iy + y y 4 ~ ~ i ~ STATE OF CMIFORNIA AS PER MM RECORDED IN BOOK ~' I ry ~ .Mm' _ - ~\ i y> ~L 143 OF PARCEL MAPS, PACES 41 THROUGH W le ~ ~ I INCLUSIVE RECORDS OF SAID CWNTY r,, h° I ~~ ~~ _/ i wnrer. mrx. ~~ ~~ ym \ / _ \ I ~ I I y , ~. ~, 4,~I~ -~ - ~~I~~, _ 1 ~I', y ,'" I yy r..m u~oru~w w++m .Manauno Y i~l ~ i~ ~ - ~ I ~~~~141 orc wm.n~v. www. mrzacus.. EE I A - i rFFllr ~• ~owwu~iw. ~m~v v°o m~•wn rmu sl I(I Y li ~ __ I I ~ ~ ~ 19i ~ ~ ~ _ ~ - - I I ~ ~~ ~ I ' - _-_ •esmneawwcenwwe~ om-m-. ~ 4 ~~ ~ ~_ ~~ ~ I I ~ ~~ ' oxrce ~ r.. nor u< ~ ~ A ~ + Awswr .umiws rci u «d:onuwon uc ~`°~~.~: ~ ,~ ~I ~ 7 I ~~ ~__ ..nn r.. - _~ ~ ~ l V I ~ ~ ~ _ ~ _~ ~` av~°^°~ ^~"^a' ~ _- ! ~~I U I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I ~ ~~ ~ _- i I; -___ W ~ __ I {~ I ~ ~ I s _ t ~~~+ ~~ G alllLlllOlllllllilOlllllp - ~ ~ a ' - -+, ~~ „ ~ ~ ~' - - - I '~ , . . ~ + fir= 1 "~ ,~~ ~; ~ , ~, ~~>~ ~~ >a.~~ ~ ~ ''i ~~r I GNE,9A,gO',~ ~ ~, '-- r ' - ~ - ~ I ~ ' ' GBOIIMW( 10V mnlt rNVm Sl CYY0~01 I~y1W~~~~ l~~ 1 1 i- ~ I M ~q ir~maw.. oev.~.~~•m ~' ~i~- ~~~((r( ~i ~ 4 Q o III + I _ ~, ~~i VI ~i/ I o ~ 11`I , KLAN FA4]Q'I8 _ ~~\ ~ ~ f ~( lI _ I ~.w~a..,~a.~,a..,a m.W. _ .~~ /G J _ eY OPSU.aID,G14A'lPRdn~ rK~ gY~SiM M __('~___ _' +~ //I R - \ I ~ ' ~II O.~m u.~ i4 ~~n ~Rw9 ~~ I~iy ~'/.~-r SIIE[l tl IP i ' I ~i r , ~I ~ , i F~~~ ~ ~ 1 I O.. nmu.~aonwn W..w~v~u°v®N..ur,o. I ` _ .~~I~,i I ~~ I v r I~ a[uiur.. U R rNm uy n tam W.~-.a i _ ~4m++ M fgpa N qNl rc wnotll uucV.1 vmM f f+l' R ~ w . ' ' '~ ..r iasamm..cnue. u.m .nA MtYIAM I~''II~ ~ rr _ )(I Qi~ mu ~ - 'li (i I ~I ~~ IIi~I- f"h +I~ ~ - c ~ 1 i~I/ ~I pp p O mwmmrwmlcvra~ F '•, 'I III ' rti - I 3~ ~~ox..o.m nn.c .TM .~: .~o`~"...uo ..n.v J° ul P ~ I _ ~~ I ' . V m M ~.,..~ i . .. _ - s. ~.~ I ipn ~ ~a a e ~ ~miepn~be iK Mi~~iw~n~vo Mom . ~• f ~I __ _ _ '~ li mom m[o~n ttim~i u wmRUo-a -~ ~ ~ ~~~' ~ _ _ __ ' O __ ~ i~~~ +~ (ws im nn.mm ..r~iiu auaYOic.m~....am -~ /,~ - _ __ E _ ~';?__ __~=,~ I _c_ ____ _ ______ __ __ I - _ __ _ _ __ _ e1 _. _ _. _ _ - - GTV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DRC 2ooa-01013 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 16926 ~r°`t.°-'L ®N ~ $UBTPM78928 ®m ~~ T1E SKiNATDRE CENTER ate. dRf rg PAw~~~ CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • u Doug Fenn July 19, 2005 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-01013 - ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, INC - A request to develop a 113,015 square foot retail center, on 18 27 acres in the Industrial Park Distract (Subarea 12), located between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue, and fronts along 4th Street - APN. 0229-263-49 thru 53 Related Fde Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16926 A COMPLETE SET OF PLANS WILL BE PROVIDED AT THE DESIGN REVIEW MEETING. The applicant has addressed every previous and secondary issue of the previous staff report A substantial amount of primary material has been added to every bwlding that creates a protect that has a lasting look of quality and permanence Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee approve the revised protect as submitted Attachments Reductions of elevations Design Review Committee Action. Members Present Staff Planner Fletcher, Coleman Doug Fenn The Committee recommended approval subject to staff verifying parking ~~~!-~ `G' ` DS DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS . 8.40 p m. Doug Fenn May 31, 2005 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16926 - ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, INC - A request to subdivide 18 27 acres Into 9 parcels in the Industrial Park Distnct (Subarea 12), located between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue, and fronts along 4th Street -APN: 0229-263-49 thru 53 Related Flle DRC2004-01013. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-01013 - ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, INC. - A request to develop a 113,015 square foot retail center on 18 27 acres in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 12), located between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue, and fronts along 4th Street -APN 0229-263-49 thru 53 Related Flle Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16926. Desion Parameters The site Is surrounded by vacant land and Industnal/office uses to the north and the Costco and Wicks furniture retail complex to the east across Buffalo Avenue To the west, across Richmond Place Avenue, is the Tharaldson Hotel with related restaurant and retail pad protect DRC2003-00770. To the south, across 4th Street is the Ontario Mills The street frontages of the site are fully Improved with curb and gutter The land division Is for financing purposes and Is in conformance with City regulations The protect is an Infill protect The proposed protect Is planned for a large Inline retail building . (Building 1) totaling 84,230 square feet There are four retail buildings (Buildings 2-4), Including one building intended for a bank with adrive-thru, designed to front along 4th Street The four retail buildings range from 5,600 square feet to 5,800 square feet Two of the buildings (Buildings 2 and 3) are anchored at the southwest corner of 4th Street and Richmond Place A diagonal oriented landscape/hardscape plaza that has a large fountain at its terminus, which Is visible at the 4th Street and Richmond Place intersection, bisects these buildings All of the buildings are richly designed with a modern theme, which has a subtle industrial design, that Is indicative of this area The buildings are concrete tilt-ups with strong vertical and honzontal Interplay along the facades There Is also ledge/stackstone that is on towers and freestanding concrete tilt-ups walls on the primary retail building The applicant proposes blue reflective glazing and a multi-color scheme of grays, light brown, and light earth tone green to add contrast to the buildmgs Staff Comments. Malor Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect Site Plan The primary access into the protect Is off of 4th Street, and "Lighthouse Monument" towers that are 12 feet high flank this entry Because of the large size, scale, and mass of the protect, these monument towers should be at least 20 feet In height' Additionally, these towers • should have stone material Instead of the proposed Integral colored concrete ~ To provide a perspective The entry tower elements at "Town Square" at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard are 17 feet high D (~ DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTPM16926 AND DRC2004-01013 -ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, INC • May 31, 2005 Page 2 2. The trellised pedestrian pathway that is submitted from the primary retail Building 1 to Building 4 should also be extended to connect the other buildings This extension should be the same design material and concept as the proposed trellised pedestrian pathway 3 The site plan and landscape plans need to depict landscape planters surrounding the trash enclosures with the exception of the gate access side 4 The decorative paving at the primary entrance off of 4th street should be extended along the entire landscape median The drive-thru for Building 5 should be extended back 10 feet to the east so as to not conflict with the adtacent on site two-way drive aisle Building Elevations. Building 1 a Additional stonework should be designed on the entire front portions of the bulding that are proposed with the square reveal theme Stonework should be added on the sides of the building of the three windows with the metal canopy overhang element The stonework at the rear of the building should be raised to the next reveal level • b To be in concert with the two matching tower elements, the central tower like element should have reflective glazing similar to the two towers c On the rear elevation, the roll up doors should have windows and metal trellis work over them as the applicant has proposed on the interior roll-up doors d The cornice treatment that is on the tower elements should be wrapped around the entire budding. Bwlding 2 and 3 a Additional stonework should be designed on the entire tower elements that are proposed to be painted yellow Stonework should be added on the sides of the bulding of the beige colored window portions The top section of the tower element should be widened so as to appear as not a tack on design c The cornice treatment that is on the tower elements should be wrapped around the entire bulding Budding 4 • a Additional stonework should be designed on the entire proposed brown painted tower On the south elevation, stonework should be raised to the next reveal line A stonework wainscot should be added on the west and east elevations b On the west elevation, windows shourl-~d be added on the yellow colored section I DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTPM16926 AND DRC2004-01013 -ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, INC May 31, 2005 Page 3 c The cornice treatment that is on the tower elements should be wrapped around the entire bwlding Bwldmg 5: a Stonework should be installed on the entire gray colored window elements. b. A decorative 3-foot high planter should be installed between the support columns of the dnve-thru overhang c The cornice treatment that is on the tower elements should be wrapped around the entire bwlding Secondary Issues• Once all of the mayor issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee wdl discuss the following secondary design Issues• a Provide matenal boards of what materials will be used for the arcular design elements that are shown on the intenor dnve aisles. b Provide more trees along the north property line to help screen this protect from a future protect to the north c The southeast comer of the protect (4th Street and Buffalo Avenue) should be enhanced to better reflect what is proposed at the 4th Street and Richmond Place intersection d Plant trees along both sides of the sidewalk, parking space, between trellises, to provide Code compliance and additional shade to the parking lot e The covered trellis bases should be covered with stonework f All decorative bollards should be illuminated and provided along pedestrian pathways Policv Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion 1 Provide decorative pavement at all drive entry throats (outside the public right-of-way) 2 Decorative pavement used in common pathways should extend across driveways for continwty and to alert motorists 3 Trash receptacles must be decorative to match the architecture of the protect 4 Outdoor dining patios for restaurants along 4th Street will requue a noise study and appropriate sound attenuation barriers, such as Lexan panels Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the protect is revised per the above recommendations and return to the Design Review Committee as a full item • ~g DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTPM16926 AND DRC2004-01013 -ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, INC • May 31, 2005 Page 4 Desion Review Committee Action• Members Present McPhail, Stewart, Coleman Staff Planner Doug Fenn The applicant did not receroe DRC comments for this meeting The Committee continued the item to the June 14, 2005, agenda Additional Site Plan recommendations were Buildino 2. Shift the west parking row to the east to eliminate the large triangle of asphalt. Bwldinct 4: Provide 15-foot landscape, including sidewalk, between the main entry and the bwlding, or move to the opposite side Bwlding 5 Revise the parking IoUdnve-thru egress to eliminate sea of asphalt and provide a less awkward circulation. • • p~ • RESOLUTION N0.05-102 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16926, A SUBDIVISION OF 18.27 ACRES INTO 9 PARCELS IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 12), LOCATED BETWEEN PITTSBURGH AVENUE AND RICHMOND PLACE AND FRONTS ALONG 4TH STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0229-263-49 thru 53. A. Recitals. 1 Associated Engineers Development fled an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16926, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16926 request is referred to as "the application." 2 On the 26th day of October 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said heanng on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred . B Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on October 26, 2005, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically fords as follows a The application applies to the property located on the north side of 4th street between Pittsburgh Avenue and Richmond Place, and b The site is surrounded to the north by industrial/office uses and vacant land, to the east of the property is a retail center, to the south is 4th Street and the City of Ontano, and the property to the west is under construction with a hotel commercial complex, and c The application proposes the subdivision of 18 27 acres into 9 parcels; d The application, in conjunction with Development Review DRC2004-01013, proposes the construction of a retail project The subdivision, together with the recommended conditions of approval, meets the development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows Dlo PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-102 SUBTPM16926-ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS INC October 26, 2005 . Page 2 a. Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16926 is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and b. The design or improvements of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16926 is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and c. The site is physically swtable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable infury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e. Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16926 is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and f The design of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16926 will not conflict with any easement acgwred by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. On September 28, 2005, the Planning Commission adopted a Mitigated Negatroe Declaration for the assoaated master planned retail development, which included the proposed parcel map The Commission adoption declared that impacts could have a significant adverse environmental impact on short-term air quality, cultural resources, geologic problems, noise, hydrology, and water quality. However, mitigation measures were required to reduce all impacts to a level of less-than-significant. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subfect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference: Plannino Department 1) Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall be prepared (or amended) to address such issues as: Reaprocal ingress and egress, reaprocal parking, property maintenance standards and landscaping standards, and adherence to the Uniform Sign Program, in order to ensure coordinated long term maintenance of the shopping center. The CC&Rs shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission and the City Attorney prior to map recordation. Encineenng Department 1) Fully complete all missing public improvements for 4th Street, Buffalo Avenue, Richmond Place, and Mission Park Drive including curb and gutter, sidewalk, pavement reconstruction and overlay, streetlights, traffic signs, traffic striping and traffic signal and/or traffic signal modifications. • a) Provide deceleration right turn lane for westbound 4th Street driveway and for Richmond Place Install a right turn lane for protect driveway per Standard Drawing 119, Section A-A and for Dil PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-102 SUBTPM16926-ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS INC . October 26, 2005 Page 3 Richmond Place intersection per Section B-B of the Standard Prepare a traffic analysis to determine regwred lane lengths. b) Provide a third westbound through lane along the 4th Street frontage 2) Protect the existing 4th Street 'Major Divided Arterial' improvements including curb and gutter, streetlights, traffic signs, traffic striping and traffic signal modifications, or replace. 3) Protect the existing Buffalo Avenue 'Major Arterial' improvements including curb and gutter, streetlights, traffic signs and traffic striping, or replace. 4) Protect Richmond Place'Industnal Local' improvements including curb and gutter, streetlights, pavement traffic signs and traffic striping, or replace 5) All asphalt concrete pavement along the street frontages of the project to the centerlines of 4th Street and Buffalo Avenue shall be removed • and replaced, cold planed and overlaid or otherwise repaired to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 6) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the project side of 4th Street shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the east side of Buffalo Avenue to the fvst pole west of Richmond Place, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing 4th Street shall be undergrounded at the same time. 7) Vehicular access rights to 4th Street and to Buffalo Avenue were dedicated to the City on Parcel Map 11671 Obtain CityTraffic Division approval to place drive approaches as shown After Traffic Division has approved the driveway locations, prepare the legal documents to vacate non-vehicular access for the proposed drive approaches 8) Public improvement plans shall be 90 percent complete prior to the issuance of Grading Permits Public Improvement plans shall be 100 percent complete, signed by the City Engineer, and an improvement agreement and bonds executed by the developer prior to Building Permit issuance. 9) Operation and Maintenance of Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the Water Quality Management Plan shall be addressed m the project Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions Identify applicable . BMPs on the Grading Plan prior to Building Permit issuance ~~a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-102 SUBTPM16926-ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS INC October 26, 2005 • Page 4 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2005. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST: Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of October 2005, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS' NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT COMMISSIONERS' • D13 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16926 SUBJECT: RETAIL COMPLEX APPLICANT: ASSOCIATED ENGINEERING BETWEEN RICHMOND PLACE AND BUFFALO AVENUE, FRONTS ALONG 4TH STREET- LOCATION: APN: 0229-263-49 THRU 53 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16926 is granted subject to the approval of Development Review DRC2004-01013 B. Time Limits This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is tiled with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations • SC-1-OS Completion Date ~~- / / ~~_ Did Protect No SUBTPM16926 Comolellon Date 2 All site, grading, landscape, urigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bulding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved • use has commenced, whichever comes first 3 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all J~_ other applicable Cary Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bulding permit issuance. D. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. ~~_ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall regwre separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 2 A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and ~~ approval prior to issuance of budding permits 3 Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominwm, or town homes prior ~~_ to occupancy and shall requve separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to issuance of budding permits. E. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of ~~_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $ 474 prior to the issuance of bulding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures • Failure to complete all actions regwred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: F. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards _J_J- 2 Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by ~~ deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved 3 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring lotnt ~_/_ maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 4 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or ~~_ noted on the final map 5 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be qwt-claimed or delineated on the ~~_ final map 6 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be ~~_ dedicated to the City • SC-1-05 DIS Protect No SUBTPM16926 Comolehon Date G. • • 7 Additional street right-ot-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs Street Improvements Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but nat limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC. Pvmt Side- walk Orive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bfke Trail Other 4th Street X (b) X X X X (e) Buffalo Avenue (b) X X X Richmond Place (b) X X X 3 SC-1-OS Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) Right turn lanes 4th Street Entrance, 4th Street westbound at Richmond Place Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer -~- -J-J- ~~- ~~- / / ~~- _/~- D~~ Protect No SUBTPM76926 Completion Date Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at Intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the Ciry Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-Inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as speafied e Handicapped access ramps shall be Installed on all corners of intersections per Clty Standards or as directed by the Clty Engineer f Existing Clty roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be Installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be Installed per City Standards In accordance with the City's street tree program Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street Improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line Item within the construction legend stating °Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(rypically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation In those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The Clty Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional Information, contact the Protect Engineer Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Oty Buffalo Avenue Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 8' 25' O C 15 Gal ' Richmond Place Brachychiton populneus Bottle Tree 5' 25' O C 15 Gal ' 4th Street Foreground Trees Platanus acerifolia London Plane Tree B' 20' Max 15 Gal Approximately 60% 'Bloodgood' Informal Background Trees Pinus cananensis Canary Island Pine B' 25' Max 75 Gal ' Approximately 40% Informal Accent Lagerstroemia indite Crape Myrtle 3' 20' Max 24' Box 'Muskogee' Construction Notes for Street Trees ' FIII In Quantity on plan 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City Inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backflll soli amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public Improvement plans only Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, Including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or Industrial driveways may have Imes of sight plotted as required SC-1-OS • -~-~- ~~- ~-~_ ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~. • Did Protect No SUBTPM16926 Comvlehon Date ~H. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A signed consent and waiver f Districts shall be filed with the permits whichever occurs first 2 Parkway landscaping on the i Beautification Plan 4th Stree I. Drainage and Flood Control orm to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building Formation costs shall be borne by the developer ollowing street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective t Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas J. Improvement Completion If the requred public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed bythe Developer and the City will be required for All public improvements on 4th Street, Buffalo Avenue, and Richmond Place K. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary • 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requrements of the Cucamonga Valley W ater District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them L. General Requirements and Approvals An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, for North drive approach on Richmond Place Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Bwlding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project C~ SC-1-OS _/~_ _/-/- ~~- ~~- ~~- ~-/- / / ~-/- ~~- _/_J- ~~- D ~~ ~,~4~~~; Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection - District -- Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS April 14, 2005 (9) Parcel Industrial Park Distract N/S 4th St ,Between Richmond and Buffalo SUBTPM16926 & DRC2004-01013 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design gwdelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commerciaUindustrial protects is 300-feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways. u At intersections ui. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv As requred by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fve Distract v. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building c If any portion of a facility or bulding is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or bwlding, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided d Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flows for this protect will be determined when the type of construction and square footage of the bwldings are known This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. C~ • D ~~ 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radds of the proposed protect may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provde required fire flow • 3. Fire protection water plans are required for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fue Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet • 2. Group "A" Occupancies. 3. "E" Occupances with an occupant load of 50 or more persons. 4. All structures that do not meet Fire Distract access requirements (see Fire Access) 5. When required fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure 6. When the building access does not meet the regwrements of the 2001 California Building Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard #9-7 7 When any applicable code or standard requires the structure to be sprinklered FSC-5 Fire Alarm System The California Bulding Code, the RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the Califorrna Fire Code regwre a listed fire sprinkler morntonng Central Station Fue Alarm system Plan check approval and a bulding permit are regwred Prior to the installation of the fire alarm system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6. u FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Std #9-7 Location of Access All portions of the structures 15' story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fue District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the Dao exterior of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards • are• a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b. The maximum inside turn radws shall be 24-feet. c. The minimum outside turn radws shall be 50-feet d. The minimum radws for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). ~. Trees and shrubs planted adtacent to the fire lane shall be kept trammed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 3. Access Doorways: Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be • provided as follows. a In bwldmgs without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Bwlding Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or mator fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the regwred access roadways When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire Distract access to all regwred openings 4 Access Walkways• Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required bwlding exterior openings 5 Commercial/Industrial Gates• Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be m accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2 The following design regwrements apply a The gate shall be motorized and slide open horizontally or swing inward. b All gates must open at the rate of one second for each one-foot of regwred width. c. When fully open, the minimum width shall be 20-feet d Gates are not regwred to be motorized • 3 Da i 6. Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 7 Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property • • Aerosol Products • Application of Flammable Finishes Operation • Automobile Wrecking Yards • Battery Systems • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Cellulose Nitrate • Compressed Gases • Cryogenics • Dry Cleaning Plants • Dust-Producing Processes and Operations • Explosive or Blasting Agents • Flammable and Combustible Ligwds • Frwt Ripening Plants • Hazardous Materials • High-Pile Combustible Storage (HPS) • Liquefied Petroleum Gases • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings Magneswm Working Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Open Burning Organic Coating Ovens Powder Coating Public Assembly Pyrotechnical Special Effects Radioactive Materials Refrigeration Systems Repair Garages Rubbish Handling Operations Spraying or Dipping Operations Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures Tire Storage Welding and Cutting Operations Wood Products/Lumber Yards FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino • The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 -- Daa If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Budding & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from isswng a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has • met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure regwrements. A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new faality. 2. Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is regwred to submit a Plan, is also regwred to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions. The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner. FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 Califorrna Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fue Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation • 1. Reciprocal Access Agreement. The plan as submitted indicate that the regwred Fire Department access: a. Is located on property which is not under the control of the applicant; or b Crosses a property line, or c. Is shared by multiple owners, or Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire District The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, bwlding or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire District approval. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino To assist Fire Construction Services in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal• The current title reports to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties included in the agreement . The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subject to the agreement. ~a 3 c A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn radn and slope of roadway surface shall be provided The access roadway shall comply with the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 • 2. Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement The plans as submitted indicate that a required private fire mains or appurtenances a. Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant, or b. Crosses a property I~ne; or c. Provide service to adjacent properties, or d. Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association; or e. Is shared by multiple owners Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the private water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection egwpment essential to the water supply. The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District The agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions • PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, speafications, flow test data and calculations for the private water mam system for review and approval by the Fire Distract Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any bwlding permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed m accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems. The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fue hydrants within a 600-foot radws of the project Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard 4. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the . installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 6 Da ~ 5. Construction Access. The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 6 Fire Flow. A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is • responsible for obtaining the fue flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 7. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures°. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the regwred fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3 Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or egwpment is placed in service 6 Fire Alarm System. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7 Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services. 8 Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable • to Fire Construction Services. Day 9. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the . requred annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 10. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercal/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness. When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non- illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance. Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial and industrial buldings The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all swtes 11. Hazardous Materials: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fue Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division. The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 12 Confidential Business Occupancy Information• The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subiect building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. • 13. Mapping Site Plan Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'h" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all dewces and building features as regwred in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. • 8 Dad T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: October 26, 2005 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Dan Coleman, Acting Clty Planner BY Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00699 -THE RANCH GROUP - A request for a land use amendment from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) in connection with a proposal for a master plan for 79 single-family residential lots on 18 6 acres, located at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 6th Street - • APN 0210-062-08 Related Flle Development District Amendment DRC2004-00700 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2004-00700 -THE RANCH GROUP - A request to change the Development District Map designation from Industrial Park (Subarea i6) to Low-Medwm Resldentlal (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 18.6 acres at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 6th Street -APN• 0210-062-08 Related Files. General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00699 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION. A Prolect Density 4 25 units per acre as shown on the illustrative Master Plan B Surrounding Land Use and Zonino North -Single-Family Residential, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South -Single-Family Residential, Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East -General Industrial West -Neighborhood Park, Park C General Plan Designations Prolect Slte -Industrial Park with a Master Plan North -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) • South -Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East -General Industrial West -Park fTEMS E & F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00699 AND DRC2004-00700-THE RANCH GROUP October 26, 2005 1 • Page 2 D Site Characteristics The 18 6-acre site is the remaining acreage of the DeBerard Ranch homestead It is currently used as a vineyard, and dilapidated farming accessory structures are included on the site The site is generally flat and drains southerly. BACKGROUND The Planning Commission previously held a public hearing on this matter on August 10, 2005, and unanimously recommended approval, however, because of some mailing list deficiencies, staff and the applicant brought the applications back to the Commission after correcting the marling list and re-notiang for this new public hearing. The applicant, with staff in attendance, held a neighborhood meeting on July 28, 2005, at the Lion's West Community Center. Approximately 10 residents were in attendance with general concerns such as supporting future single-story houses versus two-story, view protections, and circulation improvements. In general, the attendees were supportive of the single-family master plan (Exhibit C). ANALYSIS: A General The site is bordered on the north and south by single-family residential uses and a public park on the west side to the east across Archibald Avenue Therefore, the requested amendment is compatible with the neighborhood It should be noted that when the area to the south was rezoned November 17, 1999, from Industrial to Low-Medum • Residential, it was a consideration at that time to change the subject site as well. However, the property owner objected and, therefore, the site was left within the Industrial Park designation The requested designation would generate less traffic, air pollution, and have only a marginal increase in park and recreation needs than the current Industrial Park designation In addition, the designation would be highly compatible with the other residential uses in the area. The Master Plan as submitted illustrates that a conventional Low-Medium Subdivision of 79 single-family residential lots (4 24 dwelling units per acre) can be reasonably developed on the site It should be noted that the Master Pian is Illustrative only and that a separate Tentative Tract Subdvision Map and application, will need to be processed at a later date B Environmental Assessment• The Initial Study indicates possible temporary environmental impacts that may occur as a result of future development and grading activities such as air quality and noise With the noted mitigations in place, the temporary impacts wdl be reduced to aless-than-significant level No development is being proposed at this time A Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the project site • ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00699 AND DRC2004-00700 -THE RANCH GROUP • October 26, 2005 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends the adoption of the attached resolutions recommending the City Council approve the requested applications for General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00699 and Development District Amendment DRC2004-00700, and to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts Re submitte , Dan oleman Acting City Planner DC LH\ma Attachments. Exhibit A -Location Map Exhibit B -Master Site Plan Exhibit C -Neighborhood Sign-in Sheet Exhibit D -Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00699 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Distract Amendment • DRC2004-00700 • L~F3 J J ~ 1 ~ J CAMERON ST ~~ GOLDEN OAK PARK 1~ 7 o n DE BERARD RANCH DEVELOPMENT • 300 0 300 600 Feet DRC2004-00699 (GPA) DRC2004-00700 (DDA) Exhibit ~ LOCATION MAP - C°~ F ~ s,,,~wanoaca~ ~,T6 W1~•ND~ rl $ eAF ~Insa~saneanvmv®avmHaoons ~ U >"- EDNVII UNV~4 c ~ Q • e A p Q t~eE:$ iE~ ~~S 9e~ ~ 4~9DS ~ ~~~( ~aW~+ ~I o ~ B ~~ ~ ~e~-~ ~~I~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~ aD ~~ ~ a ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~~~t~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~ r»u iseis ~, terra © '~rx~av_ ~ ~ ~ocm z ~ ~~~ .,~_ _ -_~~- -_ Q`NgM7lly'' ~+. --~- _ ,~ i ---- , A ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I~-- w i ~ > ~ , 1 1 , , 1 V_-- ITi ~~_ `^J /~ II ~ 1 1 F~fn~ l ^l ~ U G I 1 1 1 ~ It -- 1 1 i 1 ~, 1S t,vHS^? i ~ ~1 ~ L M 1 ~' ~ ~ -~/ ~ o ~~ ~ ~ ~' I~ I I 1 1~ o n ,,1 ~ -- I ; -~_ ~ J A 1 -- ~i----- w ---- ~, ~, $X!G i ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~~ i _- I ~w i' ~ t' wyii w Tw ~-~ i-ia'-~`_ ,I n f _1.~ y __~ ~; ~ J __ ~~ ~. '~iT _~-~ i ~ c, 1 w \ i ~ 0 r ~IC.~d ~ ~. ~, ~ ~y~l arv s J i ,_• ~' , ~ ~' G ~ i~ I S . ~xti~6tT g - DEBERARD RANCH COMMUNTIY MEETING Thursday, JuIY 28, 2005, 7:30 PM LIONS WES"i COAgMUNTY CENTER Filipe Room PLEASE SIGN IN Kd ~~~ i 17~ 1• 9 tea`/ ~~~j Ex~~er c c-~-F~ _ _ Address _ ~e~.~U~ 305 • 1I 11 u ED. Please note that B is the responsibility of the applicant ro ensure tllat staff wt71 not 6e available ro pedorm work required to Prey missing Appkcation Number for the Protect ro which this form PeRains: ProledTide- l/E~~~' Name & Address of preje°t owner(sr Name & Address o! developer w Purled sponsor. ~ M ~ 5 ~T f' ~ Rev. 3l~7t04 _ -~~.._W_. ~«...., can+.+~x-peae'I ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (part I -Initial Study) (Please type or print clearly using inK Use the tab key to more tr°°1 °~ 6ne to the next fins) Contad Person & Address c . ~J5 AP/o ti~£ Name & Address o/person Prepanng this form jd d+llerent from above). hone Numbar.' ~ ~~/-~I / Telep -~~~~ Information indrea[ed by an asterisk (•) ~ not requued of non-construct°n GUP's unless oihenvise req a ~ ftY~ f ~~~ '1) Provide a full scale (8-72 x 11) copy of the USCiS Quad2nt Sheet(s) which indudes the proj the srte boundades. south, eas4 end halo hs that show representatve views into the site ham the no~esentatve views of p) provide a set o1 rwlo fpom ~ s~e /ram tha prima access points tllat servahthe sita% and rep ry west views I_to ~~ shower krcaton of each p graph s+9~cant features from the site. Indude a map 9 ~ o~ rr y'~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $~ y) Pro%ed Locabon (descn7re). SW ~~J1e nl ER ~ q) I Numbers Assesso/s Parse (attach additonal sheet d necessary)' ?/(,-Q>oG -Q8 •5) Gross Srte Area (ac/s4• R.f 2~• ~G~$/C • •6) Net Srte Area (total site size minus area of Pubtrc streets & proposed !~ ~~~$$ dedications): ed neral plan amendment ormne change which would affed the pro)ed site 7) Descnbe any propce 9a (attach additional sheet it necessary)' .T / ~ ~ t~ C~~L17JG ~~~ x. 7~ l~~iv~i-iTi~ 1oTs ~r Rev_ 3/17/04 ,~„_.,-.~ em,ty Paril doCPa9e 2 :0/Ll/E "nay gaoeyaoP tN~a ,.N,~.a .ter-nom.... ~.._.. --- ~~ /~% u a ` ~ ~ ~ ego pue .(,Valr41 a. -alrsay);osl°adseJeouots!y~o/pueleinllnouw+ouHaylaquosa4 (Ot suodalpa•IS';qnd'sXoal)uoRerwo}ur}osao~nosfle J~ ~ /~/ :(sarpNs oy1g4 'stanurs Jeor6oJaatpre pue ogorq'sarprgs nr6oJotp~(t! ~o/pue Jeor6oJoa6 °a"J uo7euuojur {o sa°inos ye eJr~ 'uo.41PP s ua pselryoMs saxgea; lue°yru6/s;o sydei6ologd yoep y "sainlonrls ag31o esn ey! pue (uoyrpuoa pue a6e 6urpnlau) a!. 6ugsrxa .Cue equosad -spadse orua°s pue 'sasnoo a6euJerp 'spew Pug sl!g4 'saaq aiNern `s7gu4ue Pug shield r r s ros'~igde~6odo! uo uoJ euuo ur 6ur n uU°alwd ay! ago/aq s!s/xa U se eUS ay1 /0 6uptas Jeo!s.(4d a41 a<7p°sap (6 ~,14g, r. , ; p !~ ~ wry ~ c o iT7 r f r~r r'~ ~~~ ~ ~ n~1 / 1 ~~ .~alo~d ay! juaruardu~r F/Inl o! ~ap1o ur saraua62 • Jeluawwano5~aglo pue eb'uowe°r~ o4oue~ In ~+~~ a41 u~oq tiessa°au aq ru+ goryn~ slruuad J/e}o uogduasap a apnJoul (8 • • 71) uescnbe anynoise sourt~s and then (e~aw lh~at nuw affe~~ ;he s'te (a'rcra$ readwsynoae, etc.) andhow Jtey w:ll affect • proposed uses: a ~~/G ~/G/ 5 c - - ,b6V D ~FI- (p) Descn7~e the proposed Protect in deist]. 7hts should provide an adequate descnpUOn o(fhe site in terms of ultimate use that will resuM from the ProPaz~ Proled Indicate t! there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur wtTh each Phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach addmonal sheet{s) i( necessary: GPI A'~U 2o,~I~ Goff NG>~ /5 /N 0~~7 TD ~JLL6W ~D~ THE l~si~l.~~MEr~! D~ ~9 RFSI~+JT,ih.l, ~uil7S • 13) Describe the sun°undmg pr°peties, indudng information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or went azpects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc ), :ntensdy o/ land use (one-fam(ry; spa heuses, shops, department stores, eta) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc): -- .~. i tq) l~he proposed pro)ed change tt,e pattern, scale, or cbarader of the suneunding general area e(the project? Rev. 3/17/OS c a6ed~P LUed LPNS Iegwfltl3lNr IIYJ~nav~..... ~ _ v0/LL/E 'na}j P a ~ aieaipur/ payoeUN -(sfrun ales:oJ:o le.ua: a:_ sNUn Jay? q~ :ans Jo/ wnwrxew Pue ans7o7 wnwrurw 'sans 7aoJed {o a6ueJ a{eorpm) Payoe7aQ 'T~:spun7equaplsaf{ofagwnN (Ol =S1~3Pt~fid 7tJI1N30(S3.'.~ ;;e/Fap/7s6)leulsnpuUfsra:awwo~ q u e AaOeA s6uowran~ I6SZ-L86 le t~PJS!(7 aJ M ie a adze eyJ petuoo asee7d 'vogeoyuep ~ayun{~oj -(salewgsa a6esn ~o{VJuewrpegN aaS) :uogrraus6 a6eA+as,fl FP !o aJeolpur pasodad s7 waJS.Ss a6en+as NeUues a of afueyasrp /f 'sJSaJ uogelaaiad yoeJJe pasodNd aJe sNUe1 ogdas p `! 7esodsrp a6eMes{o poyJeu~ Pas°d°~d aJ~rpul (6! ~eMaS ~ Xuel o!JdaS ^ ~~t ~ eryewwo~ 'q --~- os rw 6) asn Xead (oe/dep/IsB) 'PW/I ( N- /le ----- (6ep/7e6)lequaprsad .e ~--- (dec,7e5) asn Xead -1691-LB61a topJS?01alsM ifa!!eA e8u°'udrt~ aqJ pgJUOo ~/~ as -a6esn ~ateti7 {o tunowe paJOadxa aleorpu7 (B l asea7d 'ualeoyuep ~ayJrn{ ioj '(saiewgsa a6esrt io{ N luawyoeuv S) sal .tue ateoPU7 (L! •sweJp aus ayJ yo!4n^ o;ur (sagddns latett pgsawaP 6uPnlour) uele,N p Poq saaq oniaos:o aln;ew {o s7usulaoslda~ io/pue s7enowa~ pasodad aJ~!Pul (9l. ~pasodmd ale Eugeo:dpernos{o spoyiaw Jeyht Lsas't airs-uo pue saryadwd7u os~~7f~~ a72n!Pul (Sl • asrou asay7 Qrna n~o}7 7unowe pue ao.^os 6urpn7aur'oale:aua6 aq o/ as,ou uual-6uo7 pus uua7-POys{ • • 21) Anrlc'p?t~ rar,9e of safe prices and/or rents Sate Price(s) S~ to S~v sr month) S~-~ to 5~-- 22) Speafy number of bedrooms by unit type: . ted household size by unit type= ~' '~~ 23) Indicate anaclPa - chldren who wJl be residing within the protect Contact the appropriate School 24) Indicate the expected number of school D~smcts as shown in Attachment 8• ~~~ q~f GV~tffO NGA , s_ Elementary'. -L--. JR y , a L ~~,t~p.r>rdNGi1 b Junior High: f~~L- Gtfs)FF6r' c. Senior Htgh ~~ ;OMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL AND !N3 ~i mmer)c~~Ad s~~OJEC~S at u ~/~! 25) Describe type of use(s) and major lurichon(s) - 2g) Total Hoot area of commercial, industrial, or vuhtutional uses by type. 27) ,lnd~cate hours of operation: ~J Total. 23) Numberafemployees: 64axtmum ShiY- F~ Time of r~axunum Shdi Rev y77t1>4 __ ..~.r..••_..~~ ew•rt., vain Cocrage 6 29) Prowde breakdown o/anticipated/ob classrfica6ons, mcluding~, ae a- ' j~aryranges, as wall as an rndicafior, of the role of hire for each classificafron (attach adddronal sheet d necessa !1Y 30) Es6mahon of the number of ~scr.cers to be hired that currently reside in the CrT,r .'~j~ '31) Far commercial and industnal uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollutro emissions. (Data should be ven5ad ShiarSh the South Coast Air Quality hfanagemenf Distract, at (818)572-6283)' 1 f/i~ . ALL PF.OJECTS 32) gave the water, sewer, fire, and flood central agencies senrmg the pro/act been contacted to determine their abiUty to protnde adequate sennca fo the Proposed prolect7 If so, pfease indicate their response. 33J (Examples of haTardous~and/or~oX ° e enals mcfude, but are rot Hmn d fo PCB ~radfoact~ivre sututances pesbr'c~rdes and herbicides; loafs, oils solvents, and other flammable Ifqurds and gases. Also note undergroun Sstorage ~e dY o~ of use, i! Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or dscharge on the property, known. - - _ . ~Q cr r ~ i ~F.~ F ~ Rev. 3l77rOC ...... ~..,c~.~ni .CnRM4Y:r)l1tdTERVnrh+al Study Part? docPage ; • 34) WWII the proposed protect involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals, mclud~ng but not limited to those examples listed above ll yes, provide an inventory of all such matenals to be used and proposed method o(d~sposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans ~~ I hereby certdy that the statements fumtshed above and m the attached exh~brts present the data and Information required for adequate evaluation of this protect to the best of my ablllry, that the /acts, statements, and In/ormahon presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief 1 further understand th Itlonal information maybe regwred to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City o/Rancho camonga. Date: 7- / 2 ' D ~. ~~ F ! ~ i poi nnmimirnciNC~ ~Fna MS~COUNTER\Inillal Studv Pant docPage 8 Rev 3/17/04 ~ ~ ', . ::;,,t ' ' ,~, ~ - . - _ 5,~ _ ' - c ~a - . - . ~ i ~ _ r~j'~ ., . ;~_ ,z ,+ . .. ~i ~ . ~~ S 3 R~ _ ~'l)~} • ... N d t w 7 O d 7 C d Q a /~a Y V Q t 0 d 7 C d Q a ~o t Q E+ F ~'S -nt -Lk3 ,~~i Yi . :;1 ~~. -"`,1 _ ''`-~ ~i ~i: ~~,;~ ,.~ _.., ;' f ~~, 4si . ";~~ ;~. . ~' , . ~~ v ",.s;',. ~~ tll d w N ~_ x 0 a~ c Y O J r d r K 7r~ ~/~ ~ e• ~ _ ~ ~ ° _ ~•~ _~~r' ~t •~ j~Y C'~~~y~l.u ~'n "r ~.•~i`i 1• F .~'S~.a•_: «, ~{• ~J~ i 'S?,;~~~a+..`•;~~I":,~,c'i: ``~f'`vF}r, ~~;'a„, ~y~i. ,, -ice.;; "i: a"' ~~~ni ~ ~ ~ 1 'r,%, ,?•!•Y;r wt~ht`_~rrl'r +'r,i lt.`'~$i"+~i: •.~1'. ~ iyi•r; .'t "+..'.~4. i1G •FI 'a.• Park Residential at South of Property Archibald Avenue -South Archibald Avenue -Looking North r W w d 07 ~F~ N s .r x LJ r N W ~.+ d at .v N t r x m +. N c 0 N d i r V 3 L 'r V/ a- c +. N .% W w N d C Y O O J d d i/ [7t ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga • - ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM ' INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00699 and DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2004-00700 2. Related Files: None 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00699 -THE RANCH GROUP - A request for a land use amendment from Industrial Park with a Master Plan, to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) on 18 6 acres at the southwest comer of Archibald Avenue and 6th Street -APN 0210-062-08 Related Files Development District Amendment DRC2004-00700. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2004- 00700 -THE RANCH GROUP - A request to change the Development Distract Map designation from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling urnts per acre) for 18 6 acres at • the southwest comer of Archibald Avenue and 6th Street -APN 0210-062-08 Related Files General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00699. 3. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Rocky Sanchez Ranch Development Group, LLC P.O. Box 225 Corona, CA 92878 4. General Plan Designation: Industrial Park 5. Zoning: Industrial Park Sub Area 16 6. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting (Briefly describe the project's surroundings): The site is a vineyard bordered by Neighborhood Park to the west, 6th Street and Single-family residential on the north, Archibald Avenue and Industrial Park uses to the east and Single-family residential to the south. 7. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Ciwc Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 8. Contact Person and Phone Number: Larry Henderson AICP, Principal Planner • (909)477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is requued (e.g., permits, imancing approval, or participation agreement): None E,~ F ~g City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND Project File: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00699 and DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2004-00700 2. Related Files: 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00699 - THE RANCH GROUP - A request for a land use amendment from Industrial Park with a Master Plan, to Low-Medwm Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) on 18 6 acres at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 6th Street -APN 0210-062.08 Related Files Development District Amendment DRC2004-00700. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2004- • 00700 -THE RANCH GROUP - A request to change the Development District Map designation from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling urnts per acre) for 18 6 acres at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 6th Street -APN 0210-062-08 Related Files• General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00699 3. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Rocky Sanchez Ranch Development Group, LLC P.O Box 225 Corona, CA 92878 4. General Plan Designation: Industrial Park 5. Zoning: Industrial Park Sub Area 16 6. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting (Briefly describe the proiect's surroundings): The site is a vineyard bordered by Neighborhood Park to the west, 6th Street and Single-family residential on the north, Archibald Avenue and Industrial Park uses to the east and Single-family residential to the south 7. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Croic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • 8. Contact Person and Phone Number Larry Henderson AICP, Principal Planner (909)477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e g permits, financing approval, or participation agreement). None j 1 ~i ~~ Initial Study for DRC2004-00699 and DRC2004-0700 GLOSSARY-The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVWD -Cucamonga Valley Water Distract EIR- Envronmental Impact Report FEIR- Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM~o -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAOMD -South Coast Air Ouahty Management Distract SWPPP -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 • • • Rev 1/20/05 C~Fav . Initial Study for ' City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00699 and DRC2004-00700 Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages O Aesthetics (X) Agricultural Resources (X) Air Quality ()Biological Resources ()Cultural Resources ()Geology & Soils ()Hazards & Waste Materials (X) Hydrology & Water Quality ()Land Use & Planning ()Mineral Resources (X) Noise ()Population & Housing ()Public Services ()Recreation () Transportationffraffic () Utildies & Service Systems ()Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: () I find that the proposed protect COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. • (X) I find that although the proposed proiect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the prolect have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION wdl be prepared. () I find that the proposed pro/ect MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ~s required. () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. () I find that although the proposed pro/ect could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pur~ant~ earlier or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mill anon mea a imp ed u on the proposed pro/ect, nothing further is regwred. Reviewed r ~ E-~ Fd t Date June 21.2005 Date ~/~/D~ Rev 1/20/05 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00699 and DRC2004-00700 Page 4 • Issues and Supporting Information Sources EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Less Than Slgnifitent Lw WHh TM,1 A4tlPatlOn SipmfinM No 1. AESTHETICS. Would the pro/ect: a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vista? () () () (~) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (~) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic bwldings within a State Scenic Highwayl c) Substantially degrade the existing wsual character or () () () (~) quality of the site and its surzoundingsl d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (~) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the areal Comments• a) There are no significant vistas within or adtacent to the protect site The site is not within a view corzidor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 b) The protect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. c) The site is located at the southwest corner of Archibald and 6th Street and is characterized by Single-family residential development to the north and south The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this protect Design review is required prior to approval. City standards regwre the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and faalities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility Imes and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The protect would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which regwre review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and totaled to confine the area of illumination to within the protect site The impact is not considered significant 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (~) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with ewstmg zoning for agncultural use, or a O O U (~) Williamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (~) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses --. ., L._J • Rev 1/20/05 Inltlal Study for DRC2004-00699 and DRC2004-00700 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 ~~ n~ SipniRlgnl Lest Issues and Supportmg Information Sources' PolenUaey s~vNnmm WM wuoaum Tl,azl s,onn®,a ra Comments' a) The site is a vineyard designated as Prime Farmlands The site is located at the southwest comer of Archbald Avenue and 6th Street, and is characterized by Smgle- famdy residential development to the north and south There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance withm the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2. The motor concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existmg and planned development Further, two-thuds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and then economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are nol intended to be retained as farmland m the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a sigmficant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overndmg Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no • Williamson Act contracts within the City c) The site is located at the southwest corner of Archibald and 6th Street and is characterized by Single-family residential development to the north and south The nearest agricultural use is more than 1 46 mile northeast from the protect site Therefore, no adverse impacts are antiapated. ~J 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project. a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (~) applicable av quality plan? b) Violate any au quality standard or contnbute O (~) O ( ) substantially to an existmg or projected au quality wolatron? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () () (~) any criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non-attarnment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (~) () ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () ('~) number of people? Comments' a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contnbute to the pollutant levels m the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overridmg Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed project is consistent wdh the General Plan for~'i~ t~~E~ was prepared and impacts evaluated. Rev 1/20/05 l~ ~J Initial Study for DRC2004-00699 and DRC2004-00700 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 r~~ spmfi®In it Issues and Supporting Information Sources SBrnfioanl A4uyatlm S~9rvM1aIM r» I Into IM I I Air Quality Impact Report, prepared by OJI Environmental Services Inc, dated March 1, 2005 has concluded that none of the protect-related activities exceed the emissions threshold of significance established by the South Coast Air Quality management District, the California Air Resources Board, and the Federal Environmental Protection Agency. b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the proled site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again. Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and they would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a protect-specific basis. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition • so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was Investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Stall. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted In SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Rev 1/20/05 • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. . • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. CAF-f~a `~ Initial Study for DRC2004-00699 and DRC2004-00700 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Lest 7tgn SiBrcfi®rit Las Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g P°"°"ry SiBmfi®nl `"tl1 Mitlgatl°n n"° SIBnIfiCaM No I en Intro lea i n i a Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (l.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. i • 6) The site shalt be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water duality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, m accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW~CB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain sigmficant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nox, ROG, and PM,o would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatroely significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less than significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overciding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Councl. In the long-tens, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less than significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stnppmg. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the ctywide increase in operational emissions as a signfcant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. /-/ ~a ~~ Rev 1/20/05 Initial Study for DRC2004-00699 and DRC2004-00700 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 Lm Thin 9PSflfant Lars Issues and Supporting Information Sources: I~lantlallr Siyrvfl®M "~"' AUagatlan Sipnfl®rll ~' Na I In IM I I c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FEIR Identified the citywide Increase In emmssions as a significant and adverse Impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the Clty Council. The protect proposed Is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and Impacts evaluated. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors. long-term health care facmlmties, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts rf they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified In SCAQMD Rule 1401. According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified In SCAQMD Rule 1401. The protect site Is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor because it abuts existing single-family homes to the south and north Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ecY a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () ('~) through habitat modifications, on any species Identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the Callfornma Department of Fish and Game or U S Flsh and Wildlife Servmce4 b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () ('~) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the Callforma Department of Fish and Game or US Flsh and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (~) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not Ilmmted to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filimng, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially wroth the movement of any native () () () (~) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or wroth established native resmdent or mmgratory wildlife ! corridors, or mmpede the use of native wmldlmfe nursery sites? i i • Rev 1/20/05 ~ ~~ • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00699 and DRC2004-00700 Page 9 • r1 U Leaa 71,an $iQnrran Lpa Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially siQniM1tant y!M Mniuaam 711an slo,anum Ho I acl Inco ,ateC I atl I as e) Conflict wdh any local policies or ordinances U U O (~) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (~) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments' a) The protect site is located in an area developed with residential, recreation and industrial park uses. The site is a vineyard that has been previously disrupted during farming. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. b) The protect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on site, meaning the protect will not have any impacts. c) No wetland habitat is present on site. As a result, protect implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The matority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildirfe corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are some hernage trees on the protect site At the time of a development application (Tract map or Development Review) a tree removal permit will need to be submitted and evaluated at that time It is therefore, premature to consider the proposed project will conflict with any local ordinance or have an adverse impact. f) The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect~ a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (~) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.51 b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (~) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (~) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, Including those interred () () () (`~) outside of formal cemeteries ~~~~~ Rev 1/20/05 Initial Study for DRC2004-00699 and DRC2004-00700 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 r~ ~ Sgnfitarn las Issues and Supporting Information Sources PWmbaly sic"~nm"~ WMr Mbgatlon 71ip, sunnora rw i as m iee i i Comments' a) The proled site has previously been identified as a "Historic Resource' per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no substantial adverse impact since the De Berard Ranch House was demolished after a major structural fire a few years ago An appropriate Historic Point of Interest Designation and signage will be considered at the time of Development for information and local history purposes ony. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11) Construction actively, particularly grading, sod excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existir+g and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: ~) H any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the Inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 511) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphereof-influence, including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modem man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The proled site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also • r~ L. J • Rev 1/20!05 ~~r ~ " • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00699 and DRC2004-00700 Page 11 r~ ~ SipruflaM leo Issues and Supporting Information Sources s,a fig;,; M. ; tlan sp ~ ra I tl Inw letl ~ tl ~ provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-dlsturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. • • d) The proposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The protect sde has already been disrupted by on going farming No known religious or sacred sties exist within the protect area No evidence is in place to suggest the protect site has been used for human burials The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050 5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 As adherence to State regulations is regwred for all development, no mitigation is regwred in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are antiapated 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the pro/ect a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving. i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (~) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shaking? () () () (~) nQ Seismic-related ground failure, including O O O (~) liquefaction? rv) Landslides? () () () (~) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () (~) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () () (~) or that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? L.~r a / Rev 1/20/05 Initial Study for DRC2004-00699 and DRC2004-00700 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 r ~~ ~ SipnM1®M leaf Polenlm0y `~ 7M Issues and Supporting Information Sources s~an~f am ~~eyan ~ s~oNnce~n rb d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (~) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial asks to life or propert~R e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (~) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the sde and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Speaal Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5 1 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hill Fault, passes within 1 75 miles northwest) of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 5 miles north. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6 0-7 0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jaanto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is 10 5 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to M„. 8 2 earthquakes, is 18 miles northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Bwlding Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant b) The proposed pro/ect will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subtect to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, bwldings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than- sigrnficant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM~a emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible y) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PMfa emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMfo emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all Inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 51) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The protect would not withdraw water from the existing aqufer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit /or=sod type according to General Plan FEIR Figure Rev 1!20/05 `-' ~~ c3~ • • LJ • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00699 and DRC2004-00700 Page 13 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Less men Signsaril Less WIN Then Mmaaum sgnmam ra 5 1-2 Soil types onslte consist of HaC Sall association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5.1-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the prolect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types onslte consist of HaC Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5.1-3. These soils are typically Hanford Sandy Loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The prolect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. • • 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the pro/ecf. a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (~) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (~) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (`~) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (~) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (~) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the prolect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the prolect areal f) For a prolect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, O O O ('~) would the pro/ect result m a safety hazard for people residing or working in the prolect area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (`~) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (`~) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments• a) The prolect will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service C~F3 / Rev 1120/05 Initial Study for DRC2004-00699 and DRC2004-00700 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Lm roan Sipufi®n1 Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources• s~~ m wfi~ an see ~ ra i a me yea i a i Hazardous Materials Division that ~s more comprehensive than any other m the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergences. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less than significant. No adverse impacts are expected. b) The proposed protect does not include the use of hazardous matenals or volatile fuels. The City partiapates in a countywide interagency coahhon that is considered a full service Hazardous Materals Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less than sigmficant No adverse impacts are anticipated c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the protect site The pro/act site is located wdhin .75 mile of the nearest existing (Cucamonga Elementary and Rancho Cucamonga Middle) public schools and within 39 mile of a private day care (Montessori) and private school for special needs children (Keystone). Typically, the uses proposed do not create • obtectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticpated No impacts are anticipated d) The proposed protect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and ~s within 2 miles of a public airport. Protect site is located approximately 1 5 mile northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated g) The City's Mulb-Hazard Disaster Pian, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District m the event of a disaster. Because the pro/act will include at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed protect site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 • Rev 1/20/05 E,c «a • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00699 and DRC2004-00700 Page 15 • • Lev n,en '., Si9Nfifenl La! rmmmM wan than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: $iprvfifent ~ fi~tl ~ s,~.fi~ ~ ~ 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () () (`~) ( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (~) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net defeat m agwfer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which wcutd not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substanbally alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (~) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (~) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or aver, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (~) the capaaty of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? () () () ('~) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (~) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance; Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation mapT h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (~) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (~) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? 1) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? O O O (~) Comments' a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) Project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWOCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. E~Fr33 Rav 1120/05 Initial Study for DRC2004-00699 and DRC2004-00700 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Less rnert $IQIIIr1f.9M Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources• Potmta0y siomncaM NAM nuoeaum 71t9~ Siprul~oM Na i moo tea i e i a Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopmenf. Prior to commencement of construction of a protect, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting stone water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation Pertorrn inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction protect discharges. A construction protect for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction protect proponents are required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) To comply with the NPDES, the protect's construction contractor will be required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. At the time a Tentative Tract Map Application is filed a WQMP, will prepared and submitted, that identifies Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded sods, entering the drainage system after construction Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include bath structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage stone water pollutant levels mclude detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system The following mitigation measures would be regwred to control additional storm water effluent• Construction Activdies: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and oN-site erasion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods • • • Rev 7/20/05 E`>~~~3 / . Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00699 and DRC2004-00700 Page 17 Las 71mn Sipnififanl Lmf aoientbM WM Tnen Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sipn~fioM w~~p~non s~pn~nm,~ no experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project w01 be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prlor to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Opera6onah 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared pursuant to any Tract or Parcel Map Application to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the • maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a . minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from ground water in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins. CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibd IV-2. The development of the site will regwre the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development atywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities. c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain faalities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The future protect design will include landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Bwlding Offiaal and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered significant. d) oe.. +nn~nF The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new budding and hardscape C~~"~35 Initial Study for DRC2004-00699 and DRC2004-00700 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 r~ ~ 3lprtlfipM lw Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Polefiw~ Siprnfi®nl win, MNPdtlm '°an Sigrnfioni No I Q InC I!C I I proposed on the site; however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or aver All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. e) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm dram facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is for new development or significant redevelopment, therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented. ~) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non- structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. _0) Prior to Issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected h) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected. The Rancho Cucamonga area is Flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected. • • • Rev 1/20/05 C~-`,3~y • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00699 and DRC2004-00700 Page 19 r~,nr SiOmbram Leas Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotenbMy s~o~r~m WM Mnipebao 7hM s~onlrcam a» I M1 IMO orete0 I Bel I M j) There are no oceans, lakes or reservoirs near the protect site, therefore Impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow Impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. • 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the protect' a) Physically divide an established community? () () () (~) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (~) regulation of an agency with turisdiction over the protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict nth any applicable habitat conservation plan () () () (~) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 6th Street and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north and south, and a public park to the west The proposed land use and zone change to Low-Medium Residential would allow for the development of a range of residential housing product, including, single-family detached, single-family attached (du-, tri, and four-plex), multiple family dwellings (apartments), and would conditionally permit mobile home park. The protect will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed protect site land use designation is Low-Medium Residential. The proposed protect Is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection. As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The protect sde is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. • 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the protect: a) Resuk in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (~) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Resuk in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (`~) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan C,c F"~3 7 Rev 1/20/05 Initial Study for DRC2004-00699 and DRC2004-00700 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 ~~ n,.a s~gryficam tass Issues and Supporting Information Sources: P°~""ie0j~ S~gruficaa l.TNpetlan "~" S~gnfiwa '~'~ W I act Izro te0 I eC1 I act Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. 11. NOISE. Would the protect result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (~) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (~) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (~) levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () (~) () ( ) ambient noise levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect? e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (~) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels? f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (~) would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels? Comments' a) The protect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out. A Noise Study was prepared by Ultrasystems Environmental, dated March 2005 indicated that; Mitigation measures listed below would reduce exterior and interior noise levels to less-than- significant levels' Exterior 65dba Interior 45dba ~) A 7.5-Toot tall wall along 6th Street and Archibald Avenue will be required at the time of development. b) The uses associated with this type of protect normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. As such, no impacts are anticipated. • Rev t /20/05 ~~ ~~ • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00699 and DRC2004-00700 Page 21 ~.,. m., s~ynnwn ~+. Paanneiy wmi 7hn Issues and Supporting Information Sources sw.r~w µ~v~+ awe ~ Irtpatl Ircorporetea ~~ iRVea c) The primary source of ambient nose levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed actmties wdl not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the wcimty of the protect. d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-sde stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: • • 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, Including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a natlonal holiday. 3) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified (n Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, If noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 4) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts due to the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 5) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a natlonal holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 dally trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is within 2 miles of a public auport. Located approximately 1 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private avstnp, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated E~G~~ Rev 1/20/05 Initial Study for DRC2004-00699 and DRC2004-00700 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 r~ m.o Sipniewn Lm Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 P°'a""°"'' s~o~~~+ "'"' Mnipaem m~ s~~rKmn No I Inca rayed I xt i oc1 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the prolect. a) Induce substantial population growth m an area, either () () () (~) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (~) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (~) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The prolect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. Construction actrnties at the site wtll be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. No impacts are anticipated b) The prolect site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected. c) The prolect site is vacant land. No impacts are anticipated. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the prolect result m substantial adverse physical impacts assoaated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need /or new or physically altered govemmenta! faalrtres, the constructton of which could cause srgmficant environmental impacts, rn order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance oblechves for any of the public services. a) Fire protection? O O O (~) b) Police protect~on7 () () () (~) c) Schools? O O O (~) d) Parks? U O O (~) e) Other public facilities? O O O (~) Comments• a) The site is located at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 6th Street and is characterized by Single-family residential development to the north and south. Future Housing Units would be served by a fire station located approximately 1 66 mile from the prolect site. The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing faalities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the prolect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated. b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the prolect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the prolect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. • n LJ Rev ,/2o/os ~~ F 4 v . Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00699 and DRC2004-00700 Page 23 ~~ mom, SgNficeM lass Prnmroelly WM, 71ian Issues and Supporting Information Sources• s~m~r~n rn~uv~oo~ s,cnamn ~ i an iMO yea i i ee c) The Cucamonga School District and the Chafiey Joint Union High School Distract serve the prolect area. Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development. A standard condition of approval wtll requre the developer to pay the school impact fees. With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Distracts are not considered significant. No impacts are anticipated. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located adlacent to the prolect site. The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will regwre the developer to pay park development fees. No impacts are anticipated. • • e) The proposed prolect will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The prolect wtll not requre the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new faalities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9 9), the prolected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the prolected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned and is constructing a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the prolected need of 15,500 square feet at bwid-out of the City. 14. RECREATION. Would the prolect: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (~) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the prolect include recreational facilities or () () () (~) regwre the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the envvonment~ Comments• a) b) The site is m a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park, Golden Oak Park, is adlacent to the prolect site This prolect is proposing new housing that would cause a less than significant increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A standard condition of approval wdl require the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated. See a) response above. CAF ~1 Rev 1/20/05 Initial Study for DRC2004-00699 and DRC2004-00700 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 Les. Tnn siprofcvlt Len Issues and Supporting Information Sources: `°'~118Q'' S~Onficarll W"" Mnpetlm m°' SiOnficas No I Inca reteE I I 15. TRANSPORTATIONlfRAFFIC. Would the protect: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in () () () (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (/) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity'r () () () (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments' a) The proposed land use and zone change to Low-Medium Residential would allow for the development of a range of residential housing product, including single-family detached, single-family attached (du-, tri-, and four-plex), multiple family dwellings (apartments), and would conditionally perms mobile home park The density allowed in the Low-Medium Residential zone is 4-8 dwelling units per acre Implementation of the proposed 18 6-acre protect will generate between 967 to 1,934 average vehicle taps daily, at the low and high end of the density range, respectively The proposed protect proposes the development of 79 single-family residences The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimiates that each dwelling unit will generatel3 trips daily As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. A Traffic Study prepared by OJI International Consultants Inc. indicates that the Land Use Amendment from Industrial Park to Low- Medium Residential will reduce the average net daily Trips by 337 The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in protect design The protect will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume or congestion at intersections. The protect site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No impacts are anticipated. Rev. 1/20/05 E,~ FNa C~ C , J • • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00699 and DRC2004-00700 Page 25 \_ J • ~~ m., s~.rcam Lw PWenGilly WIN 71Yn ' Issues and Supporting Information Sources: s~o„~M Mo~oau ~ s~o~~ ~ ~ b) The densty allowed in the Low-Medium Residential zone is 4-8 dwelling units per acre. Implementation of the proposed 18.6-acre protect will generate between 74 and 149 two-way peak hour trips, at the low and high end of the density range, respectively. This is less than 250 two-way peak hour trips for non-retail, therefore, is below the threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) critena for regwring a traffic impact analysis. The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each of the 79 dwelling units will generate 2 79 two-way peak hour traps daily The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The protect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. c) Located approximately 1 4 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are antiapated d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The protect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The protect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards due to a design feature. No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. f) The protect design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and wtll therefore not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated g) The protect design includes, or the protect will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc.). 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the pro/ect: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? () () () (~) b) Require or resuk in the construction of new water or () () () (~) wastewater treatment faalities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (`~) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects ? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (~) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed ~.~ ~ ~3 Rev 1/20/05 Initial Study for DRC2004-00699 and DRC2004-00700 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 Leas mr~ sonmc.m ~+ Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 'so ~ M„~ ~ s. ~„ ,,, e) Result in'a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that d has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing ' commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permuted () () () (/) capacity to accommodate the protect's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste? Comments• a) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water Distnct sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District sewer system, • which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontaro, neither of which are at capacity. The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Bwlding Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The protect is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water Distract water system There is currently a suffiaent water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. f) 9) Rev. 1 /20/05 Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated ~d->c ~ • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00699 and DRC2004-00700 Page 27 U • Issues and Supporting Information Sources. Less 71,n Signfroaa 4a WM Than Mngatlan Si7nace,a No 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the () () () (~) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually () () () (~) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ('Cumulatively considerable' means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects)? c) Does the protect have environmental effects that will () () () (~) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments• a) The site is not located m an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3. Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed. Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site. b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the silo in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was-adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Fmdmgs of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out m the City and Sphere of Influence. The Cary made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less than significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEt7A Gwdelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. Rev 1/20/05 c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality wJou~be short-term and would cease once ~~-~ "/ Initial Study for DRC2004-00699 and DRC2004-00700 construction activities were completed impacts associated with the exposure measures contained in this Initial Study levels. EARLIER ANALYSES City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 28 The Initial Study identified potentially significant of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation will ensure impacts are at less than significant Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEOA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive: General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certfied January 4, 1989) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 18, EIR (SCH #93102055, certified June 15, 1994) Traffic Study, prepared by OJI International Consultants Inc., and dated May 2005 Acoustical Analysis, prepared by, Ultrasystems Environmental, dated March 2005 Air Quality Impact Report, prepared by OJI Environmental Services Inc., dated March 1, 2005 • • • Rev. 1/20/05 ~'''~ ~~`~' • Initial Study for nR~~nn4-00699 and DRC2004-00700 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 29 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point w)F ere-cfe~rly no signiiicar~nvironmental effects would occur. i Applicant's Signa~re:_~~/~-~ Date: 7~/ -O.S Pnnt Name and u • E~Fy~ Rev 1/20/05 ' _ City of Rancho Cucamonga . MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaret/on is being circulated forpubllc revlewln accordance w/fh the Califomla Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the PubOc Resources Code. Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00699 And Development Distnct Amendment DRC2004-00700 Public Review Period Closes: August 10, 2005 Project Name: Project Applicant: Ranch Development Group, LLC Project Location (also see attached map): Located at the southwest comer ofArchibald Avenue and 6th Street - APN 0210-062-08 Project Description: A request for a land use amendment from Industnal Parkwith a Master Pian, to Low-Medwm Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and to change the Development Distnct Map designation from Industnal Park (Subarea 16) to Low-Medium Residential on 18 6 acres FINDING This Is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an • Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but ^ Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public revew would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and ® There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Reportwill not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. October 26 2005_ • Date of Determination Adopted By E~F4~ • RESOLUTION NO 05-103 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00699, A REQUEST FOR A LAND USE AMENDMENT FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL IN CONNECTION WITH A PROPOSAL FOR A MASTER PLAN FOR 79SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS (4-8 DW ELLING UNITS PER ACRE) ON 18.6 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 6TH STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0210-062-08. A. Recitals. 1. The Ranch Group fled an application for General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00699, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as °the application.° 2 On October 26, 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date . 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public hearing on October 26, 2005, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 18 6 acres of land, basically a rectangle configuration, located on the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 6th Street, and is presently a vineyard. Said property is currently designated as Industnal Park with a Master Plan; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and is an existing single-family residential neighborhood. The property to the west is designated Park and is developed as a Neighborhood Park The property to the east is designated Industnal and is developed with industrial and commercial uses. The property to the south is designated Low-Medwm Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is an existing single-family residential neighborhood; and • c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-103 DRC2004-00699 -THE RANCH GROUP October 26, 2005 • Page 2 d. This amendment does promote the goals and obtectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially mturious or detrimental to the adtacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. f. The Master Plan as submitted illustrates that a conventional Low-Medwm Subdivision of 79 single-family residential lots (4.24 dwelling units per acre) can be reasonably developed on the site. It should be noted that the Master Plan is illustrative only and that a separate Tentative Tract Subdivision Map and application, will need to be processed at a later date. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows. a. That the subject property is swtable for the uses permitted in the proposed distract m terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area, and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. That the proposed amendment is m conformance with the General Plan. . 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelmes promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained m said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed within the Mitigation Monitoring Plan c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the • proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained m the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the C,r! F S~v PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-103 DRC2004-00699-THE RANCH GROUP • October 26, 2005 Page 3 presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00699, as shown in Exhibit A attached hereto for reference and each and every condition set forth below Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide . evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following prowsions• • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed • excavated sod during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices ~~~ S1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-103 DRC2004-00699-THE RANCH GROUP October 26, 2005 Page 4 Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carved over to adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 regwrements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved bySCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. • 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered egwpment where feasible • 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 11) All residential and commercal structures shall be regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation of • archaeological sites within new developments, using their speaal qualities as a theme or focal point. E~~"~"a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0.05-103 DRC2004-00699-THE RANCH GROUP • October 26, 2005 Page 5 Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on sigrnficant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdelines. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the protect site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, framed and egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activties. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected speamens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, m accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time • of year of construction. C~ i 53 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0.05-103 DRC2004-00699-THE RANCH GROUP October 26, 2005 • Page 6 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW OCB) shall be applied to ~II inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Budding Official for approval, Storm W ater Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entenng the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies speafic measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a • minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize sod exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared pursuant to any Tract or Parcel Map Application to reduce pollutants after construction entenng the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbiades Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, • including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. C.a ~s`a' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-103 DRC2004-00699-THE RANCH GROUP • October 26, 2005 Page 7 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that wdl be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The W QMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Nose • 1) A 7.5-foot tall wall along 6th Street and Archibald Avenue will be required at the time of development 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8.00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 3) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards speafied m Development Code Section 17 02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02 120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Budding Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Budding Offical within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Budding Offical If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 4) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in fvst phase. 5) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p.m. and 6.30 a m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavytrucks used • for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. E~F55" PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.OS-103 DRC2004-00699-THE RANCH GROUP October 26, 2005 Page 8 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2005. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST: Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of October 2005, by the following vote-to-wit. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS: • • • ~~ F5~ ~«+sr p~Of R necowR(ri(Sf 1 DRC2004-00699 (GPA) DRC2004-00700 (DDA) ~~ u ~n~b~~ LOCATION MAP ~~~5 2 300 0 300 600 Feet City of Rancho Cucamonga • MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00699 and Development District Amendment DRC2004-00700 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the '(Mitigated Negative Declaration/Enwronmental Impact Report) for~the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessaryto ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who wdI take action, what action wdl be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance wdl be reported. • 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible gwdelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps wdl be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Fonn wdl be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance wdl be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation well be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency (Planning Department) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~~ F~ Mitigation Monitoring Program DRC2004-00699 AND DRC2004-00700 -RANCH DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Fonn. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of • construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring afterwntten notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time. 9. In those instances requmng long-term protect momtonng, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the momtonng results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitonng/reportmg plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. • E~ ~S~ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00699 AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2004-00700 Applicant: Rocky Sanchez Ranch Development Group, LLC Initial Study Prepared by: L. J. Henderson AICP. Principal Planner Date: June 21.2005 .. 1T3 ^*h~ ~/~fir:Quality ~ .per a . ~, , ~ All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' speafications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City veniication Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer CPBO C Review of plans C 2 shall submit construction plans to Cdy denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low ilkmission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, ~r that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 pertormance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of plans A/C 2~4 Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans A/C 2~4 through seeding and watering . 1 ~ • ., - • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. BO C Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule actiwties to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans A/C ?J4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City d silt is carried over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a resuR of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , BO C During A 4 ' wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction SCAOMD Rule 403 regwrements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction sudable means. The site shail be treated with water or other soil- BO C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and Regional construction Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403. Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construcbon construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Rewew of plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Rewew of plans A/C ti4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equpment when not in use. 2 of 8 E ..Q .. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C Z4 regwred to incorporate high effiaency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C 2/4 regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. . G}Iltufalz,~eSOU~C6~ ~~<^,s a4 ~k e'~' ~ ./ 'f , ~ , , If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer vnll retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction actrvi4es, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the Ciiy of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CPBO C Rewew of report A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modrfication without an opportunity for the Cdy to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to regwre CPBO C Rewew of report '~ ~4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's CPBO C Rewew of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CPBO C Rewew of report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse prolect effects on signdicant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEOA gwdehnes. • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Rewew of repoA ~ ~4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the prolect area. Submit one copy of the completed report, wdh original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 30~ • .. , -. .. A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction CP B Rewew of report A~ 4 field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. W here mitigation monrtonng is appropriate, ' the program must include, but not be hmrted to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of report A/D 4 egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing actiwLes • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Rewew of report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Submit summary report to Crty of Rancho Cf D Rewew of report D 3 ~ Cucamonga Transfer collected speamens with a ~j copy of the report to San Bernardino County " Museum ~Geology~anil?~Soi(s ;v~:?":~:"~ r° ~~'~~'~° t~~~~y~ ~ ~ ~~~~" ~ : ;~v,$ ~ E ~ .`"" , ` . , ..~ M:, w' a.-'ri~"4 ^T Tfl^al - i xi . 1).. +f~ Pe y~.3,%f+iyu i P~ 3'S , 4~ i .1. d n.NYi~ ~~ The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) construction daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o construction emissions assoaated with vehicle tracking of sotl off- site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Grading operapons shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions construction from the site during such episodes. 4 of 8 -. .. Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions : ly"d a ogyand~lNat ~~uahtj , ~ r , z Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permd applicant BO B/C/D Review of plans A!C 2/4 shall submit to Budding Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specdically identrfying Best Management Pracbces (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activdies entering the stone drain system to the maximum extent practical. An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Revew of plans A/C 2J4 grading plan, and implemented for the proposed prolect that identities specdic measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern Caldorma, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off- site as a result of this prolect wdl be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a spea0ed time frame. Dunng construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C/D Revew of plans A/C 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the sde when there is rainfall or other runoff. Dunng construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2J4 cleaning wdl be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the sde m R T S • 5a~ • .. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 the W afar Quality Management Plan prepared pursuant to any Tract or Parcel Map Application to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B!C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertdizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Ouality Management Pian (WOMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into he storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the Cary of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Bwlding Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction P e r mit. lF° ~`'.~,~i~' ~ . ^..: nts,(yy~r~~~ ~. ~g ~ ~Nose ~ ~, "$ ~ « ~ ` em y~ A ix` a `~!+ `i^"°~ M1~ ~e !, ~ ~ ~ . t ~, ~ ~, A 7.5-foot tall wall along 6th and Archibald Avenue will BO C During A 4 be regwred at the time of development. construction 6of8 • .. Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C Dunng A 4 hours of 8 00 p.m and 6 30 a m. on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C Dunng q 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level momtonng as specified m Development Code Section 17.02 120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Bwlding Offiaal. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Budding Official Hnthin 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Budding Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C Dunng A 4 as possible in the fvst phase. construction Haul truck delivenes shall not take place between the POBO C Dunng A 4f7 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. T g • 7 O~ • Key to Checklist Abbreviations Res ,onsible,Person ~ S ~"'>'` ~` „ `d mow, P ~v,-..,. .~,,,'~'~~;.;:'.:,r` _. , „,„ _ _ _, mr ~oniioringFiequency~ x a a. _~ .,y~-~;- ~MetFiocl~ofU erificati ~ ~c~ ~- - z ,v_.,, ~ auctions';~;;"+ ~ ~~'a, ~` ~ CDD -Community Development Director or designee , A -With Each New Development ,~ A - On-site Inspection , , , ,~ , 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP - Ciy Planner or designee B - Pnor To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 - Wdhhold Certdicate of Occupancy BO -Building Offiaal or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studles/ Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E - Operatlng 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC - Flre Chiet or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 - Ckatlon `l\ ~~ V 8of8 ' - City of Rancho Cucamonga • MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration !s being c(rculated /or public review In accordance witl- the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00699 And gevelopment District Amendment DRC2004-00700 Public Review Period Closes: August 10, 2005 Project Name: Project Applicant: Ranch Development Group, LLC Project Location (also see attached map): Located atthe southwestcomerofArchibaldAvenue and 6th Street-APN. 0210.062-08. Project Description: A request for a land use amendment from Industrial Park with a Master Plan, to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and to change the Development District Map designation from Industnal Park (Subarea 16) to Low-Medum Residential on 18 6 acres. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an • Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: ^ Rewsions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public rvvew would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and ® There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Reportwill not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Inital Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. October 26. 2005_ • Date of Determination Adopted By E~~~~ • RESOLUTION N0.05-104 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2004-00700, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 18.6 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 6TH STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0210-062-08 A. Recitals. 1. The Ranch Group filed an application for Development District Amendment DRC2004-00700, as described m the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application.' 2. On October 26, 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and issued Resolution No 05-103 recommending to the City Council thatthe associated General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00699 is approved. 3. All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. • B Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referencedpublic hearing on October 26, 2005, including written and oral staff reports, togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 18 6 acres of land, basically a rectangle configuration, located on the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 6th Street, and is presently a vineyard. Said property is currently designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16); and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and is an existing single-family residential neighborhood. The property to the west is designated Park and is developed as a Neighborhood Park. The property to the east is designated Industrial and is developed with industrial and commeraal uses. The property to the south is designated Low-Medwm Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is an existing single-family residential neighborhood, and - c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan • and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, and This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element, and ~,F- f~~ / PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-104 DRC2004-00700-THE RANCH GROUP October 26, 2005 Page 2 e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. f. The Master Plan as submitted illustrates that a conventional Low-Medwm Subdmsion of 79 single-family residential lots (4 24 dwelling units per acre) can be reasonably developed on the site. It should be noted that the Master Plan is illustrative only and that a separate Tentative Tract Subdivision Map and application, will need to be processed at a later date. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is swtable for the uses permitted in the proposed distract m terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use m the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. • 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative • Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared m compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelmes promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained m said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the prolect, which are listed within the Mitigation Monitoring Plan. c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the prolect, there is no evidence that the proposed prolect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the . Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. ~.~ f= "?~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-104 DRC2004-00700 -THE RANCH GROUP • October 26, 2005 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development District Amendment DRC2004-00700, as shown in Exhibit A attached hereto for reference and each and every condition set forth below Environmental Mitioation Air Quality 1) All construction equpment shall be maintained m good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed bythe South Coast AirOuality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices CiG f= 7 / PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.OS-104 DRC2004-00700-THE RANCH GROUP October 26, 2005 Page 4 Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carved over to adjacent public thoroughfares oroccurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 regwrements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • • • C•l~= 7a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.OS-104 DRC2004-00700-THE RANCH GROUP October 26, 2005 • Page 6 4) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW QCB) shall be applied to all mactrve construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,a emissions Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Offiaal for approval, Storm W ater Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entenng the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies speafic measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize sod exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or • off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared pursuant to any Tract or Parcel Map Application to reduce pollutants after construction entenng the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7) Pnor to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the • City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce C ~F7'f PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-104 DRC2004-00700-THE RANCH GROUP • October 26, 2005 Page 7 pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identifythe structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelmes for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e , a copy of the W aste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Norse 1) A 7 5-foot tall wall along 6th Street and Archibald Avenue wdl be required at the time of development. 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of • S 00 p.m. and 6:30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 3) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property Ime Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120 Monitoring at other times may be regwred by the Bwldmg Offical. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Bwldmg Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 4) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. 5) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive • land uses or residential dwellings 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution J ~ ~ ~ r•~aON ST 7W ST OAAAEfltON ST DAR DEERBROOK Sf ~~ f• 9 a DRC2004-00699 (GPA) DRC2004-00700 (DDA) ~n~b~ ~ LOCATION MAP E~ F~Co 300 0 300 600 Feet ~J City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00699 and Development District Amendment DRC2004-00700 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the "(Mitigated Negative Declaration/Enwronmentai Impact Report) for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessaryto ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This • procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As momtonng progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be m place through all phases of the project. The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified m the Mitigation Momtonng Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance wtll be reported. All momtonng and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authonty for processing the protect. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: • City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency (Planning Department) 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~~1 F 7 ? Mitigation Monitoring Program . DRC2004-00699 AND DRC2004-00700 -RANCH DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC Page 2 3. Appropriate speaalists wdl be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Forrn. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arse requmng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form wdl be completed bythe protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring afterwntten . notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupanaes if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Dvision. The Division shall requre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requmng long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitonng/reportmg plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of bwldmg permits. • E-I- F 7S' MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC200400699 AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC200400700 Applicant: Rocky Sanchez Ranch Development Group, LLC Initial Study Prepared by: L. J. Henderson AICP. Principal Planner Date: June 21.2005 A Ou l tj • .. r a i r All construction equpment shall be maintained m good CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that ail construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer CP/BO C Review of plans C 2 shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low i emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAOMD) as well as City Planning Stait All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted m SCAOMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Rewew of plans A/C 2 noted m SCAOMD Rule 1108. All construction egwpment shall comply wdh SCAOMD BO C Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering T S 1 of 8 - .. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. BO C Rewew of plans A/C Z4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended penods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans A/C Z4 exposed excavated soil dunng and after the end of work penods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City rf sdt is carved over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high words (i e., BO C Dunng A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction SCAOMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction swtable means. he site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO C During A 4 tabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and Regional construction Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB)) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C Dunng A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean BO C Rewew of plans A/C . 4 alternative fuel powered equpment where feasible. The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Rewew of plans A/C 214 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews wdl shut off equipment when not in use. • 2of~ • All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Rewew of plans C ?J4 regwred to incorporate high efiiciencyAow polluting heating, air conddioning, appliances, and water heaters. All residential and commercal structures shall be BO C/D Rewew of plans C Z4 regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stepping. ~G~Ura{e BSOU~Ce~S~~~M~" "~' If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer well retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction actmties, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CPBO C Rewew of report A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require CPBO C Review of report A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's CPBO C Rewew of report AB 3/4 archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CPBO C Rewew of report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEOA gwdelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Rewew of report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, ~nnth original dlusirations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving n R O 3of8 - -. .. A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction C? B Review of report A1D 4 field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mit~gaUOn measures (i e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. W here mitigation momtonng is appropriate, the program must include, but not be hmded to, the following measures. • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of report A/D 4 egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils wdh minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing actiwties • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Revew of report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the montor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and nobly the monitor of the find. • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CF D Revew of report D 3 ~ Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County - Museum eology~and?Sod ~ ;~;~ R ~~, , 7 The site shall be treated wdh water or other sod- BO C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) construction daily to reduce PM~o emissions, m accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod off- site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions construction from the site during such episodes • 4 of ~ • • .. Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C Dunng A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions .~tytirolog'y~anii~W atet~CQiiahty W , «~ ' Prior to issuance of grading permds, the permd applicant BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to Bwlding Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identdying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies speafic measures to control on-site and ofi-site erosion from the time ground disturbing actnnties are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur edher on-site or off- site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame Dunng construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C/D Revew of plans A/C 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the sde when there is rainfall or other runoff During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the sde. (J} \I 5of8 The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in CE the Water puality Management Plan prepared pursuant to any Tract or Parcel Map Application to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical B/C/D ~ Review of plans ~ A/C 2/4 Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2J4 Prior to issuance of budding permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of plans A!C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices I (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm dram system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identifythe structural and ' non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C Z4 shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Bwlding Official for coverage undertheNPDES General Construction Permd. n^A@ar Noise ,r~- `t wttmas, -a.-. .yam., w, ~.. > ~ A 7 5-foot tall wall along 6th and Archibald Avenue will BO C During A 4 be required at the time of development, construction 6 of ~ . C_~ .. Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8 00 p.m. and 6'30 a.m. on weekdays, constructton including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C Dunng A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17 02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Bwlding Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Budding Offical within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Bwlding Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction actiwties shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted ' The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C Dunng A 4 as possible in the hrst phase. construction Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/B0 C Dunng A 4!7 - hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, d heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensdive land uses or residential dwellings. 7of8 Key to Checklist Abbreviations Res onstble Persori ~~~~~ ~`<~~ mkt, ~mF"~ .,P, _ ;., ~~;,~,:. , ,,;1`' ~ ~ N F , ~ a , a sue; ~ Monltorin jiF'req'uency'~;, ~ , ,~,. ,~-u ~> ~-.,,, <. ~ . °,Method~of~+V}e_rificati n R,,. e~ - ~;_ ~ ~r : r~ , ~Sanctions~;s`' .a~;~~~~~`~+rr~, ' CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 - W ithhold RecordaUOn of Final Map CP -Cary Planner or designee CE - Cny Engineer or designee 8 - Pnor To Construction C -Throughout Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval C -Plan Check 2 -Withhold Grading or Bwlding Permit 3 -Withhold Certdwate of Occupancy BO - Bwlding Official or designee D - On CompleUOn D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E - OperaBng 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds FC - Flre Chief or designee 8 -Revoke CUP 7 - CltaUon ;4T! I ~1 • 8of8. C~ • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP AGENDA GuRcn;vfONGA OCTOBER 26, 2005 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Chairman Stewart_ Vice Chairman Maaas _ Fletcher _ McNiel_ McPhad_ II. NEW BUSINESS A PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2006-00877-PAULHOFER-APre- Application Review to consider a conceptual design concept for a proposed development of 10 two-story office buildings and 11 industrial warehouse buildings on 9 82 acres of land m the Haven Overlay District (Subarea 6), located at 8812 Haven Avenue, - APN 0209-131-02 and 07 III. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda IV. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Adm~nistrahve Regulations that set an 11 00 p m adjournment time If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission 1, Lois J Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certdy that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 20, 2005, of least 72 hours prior to the meeting perGovemment Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 C~wc Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga ~~ Vicinity Map Planning Commission Workshop • October 26, 2005 ~~~~ A * Meeting Location Rancho Cucamonga City Hall 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~• N City of Rancho Cucamonga PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16926-ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS INC October 26, 2005 Page 2 finanang and maintenance purposes The proposed map complies with the regulations of the Subdivision Map Act of 2005 and the City's subdivision ordinance ANALYSIS A Design Review Committee The Design Review Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Coleman) reviewed the parcel map and project on July 19, 2005 The Committee was pleased that the applicant had addressed the many mayor and minor issues The Committee recommended approval subject to working out the remaining issues with staff B Technical and Grading Review Committee The map and protect was reviewed by the Committees on July 19, 2005, and was approved by both Committees All issues have been addressed and are included in the attached Standard Conditions of Approval Resolution of Approval with Conditions C Environmental Assessment On September 28, 2005, the Planning Commission adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the associated master planned retail development, which included the proposed parcel map The Commissions adoption declared that impacts could have a significant adverse environmental impact on short-term air quality, cultural resources, geologic problems, noise, hydrology, and water quality However, mitigation measures were required to reduce all impacts to a level of less-than-significant Based upon the facts and information contained in the prior Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with wntten and oral staff reports, the Planning Commission finds there are no substantial changes m the project or the site and its surrounding conditions that would require revision to the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. All environmental mitigation measures from the previously approved tract and development review shall apply to this project. CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site No correspondence has been received RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16926 to be consistent with the project evaluation m the previous adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and approve Parcel Map SUBTPM16926 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. Respectfully submitted, Dan Coleman Acting City Planner DC DF/ge Attachments Exhibit A -Site Utilization Map Exhibit B -Tentative Parcel Map Exhibit C -Design Review Comments dated May 31 and July 19, 2005 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16926 ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO OS-102 SUBTPM16926-ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS INC October 26, 2005 Page 2 a Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16926 is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and b The design or improvements of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16926 is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and e Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16926 is not likely to cause serious public health problems, and f The design of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16926 will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4 On September 28, 2005, the Planning Commission adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the assora d master tanned retail development, which included the proposed part Ana he C mission option ~cla~ed'thatirnp ct~ s~coatd-have significant adverse e ironme~tal impact on short- erm air quu33hty, cultural re~durces, geolog probc~e~ iQse, hydrology, d water quality However, mitigation measures were required to reduce all impacts a level of less-than-significant Based upon the facts and information contained m the pnor Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with wntten and oral staff reports, the Planning Commission finds there are no substantial changes m the protect or the site and its surrounding conditions that would require revision to the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. All environmental mitigation measures from the previously approved tract and development review shall apply to this protect. Base upon the s a d concl orth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the app icabtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall be prepared (or amended) to address such issues as Reciprocal ingress and egress, reciprocal parking, property maintenance standards and landscaping standards, and adherence to the Uniform Sign Program, in order to ensure coordinated long term maintenance of the shopping center The CC&Rs shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission and the City Attorney prior to map recordation Engineering Department 1) Fully complete all missing public improvements for 4th Street, Buffalo Avenue, Richmond Place, and Mission Park Drive including curb and gutter, sidewalk, pavement reconstruction and overlay, streetlights, ~- !I Planning Commission Meeting of RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN-UP SHEET Please print your name, address, and city and indicate the item you have spoken regarding Thank you. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 NAME ~la~e, ~ i 1a ~mr~ mA~--~~z .1~ ~ n .~ Gv ~ l G~~ rat-` ADDRESS CITY ITEM 5~~ss'In/a~,itt,{~3~, Sf~cz,V La (~. w~wt~, U`{ Rzzsa 1~3~ ihil~ A1J~ ~~I ut~tS ~75~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ 9G31~/MU.ac/ ~j/ G~ro~~.~c,s~9yCA