Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006/01/11 - Agenda PacketCow t~ • n U THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION ~ AGENDA ~~ CUCAMONGA JANUARY 11, 2006 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Stewart_ Vice Chairman Macias _ Fletcher _ McNiel_ McPhad_ II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES December 14, 2005 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public heanngs in which concerned indiwduals may voice their opinion of the related project Please wad to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be l~mded to 5 minutes per individual for each protect Please sign ~n after speaking A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16867 - ETCO INVESTMENTS -The proposed subdivision of 8 9 acres of land into 12 residential lots in the Very Low Residential District ( 1-2 dwelling urnts per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of the I-210 Freeway - APN 0225-171-19 Related Files Development Review DRC2004-00667 and Variance DRC2004-01285 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration Continued from December 14, 2005 r PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA JANUARY 11, 2006 RANCHO G'UGAMONGA 4 I CONSIDERATION TO INITIATE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005-01105 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request by Robert Bathlsh and Ken Wilson to change the Development District Map from Medium-High (14-24 du/acre) and General Commercial (GC) to Mixed Use for approximately 3 8 acres of land, generally located south of the rail road right of way to Roberds Court and from Amethyst Avenue east 325 feet- APN 0202-151-20, 0202-161-01, 02, 03, 04, and 05 Related Files General Pian Amendment DRC2005-01104, Landmark Designation DRC2005-00776 and Landmark Designation DRC2005-00777 VII. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the hme and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS IX. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Admmistrahve Regulahons that set an 11 00 p m ad/ournment time If hems go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission I, Lois J Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on January 5, 2006, at least 72 hours pnor to the meeting per Government Code on ga Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, Rancho Cucam - / ®T~ C.f~v~s-..`~_ If you need special assistance or accommodations to partapate m this meeting, please contact the Planning Division al (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired • • • • _ PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA JANUARY 11, 2006 IjANCeo CUCAMONGA 3 Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration This action will be forwarded to the City Councl for final action and the date of the Public Hearing before City Council will be separately noticed Continued from December 14, 2005 F ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16882 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request for a seven numbered and two lettered lot subdivision of 9 68 acres for 99 condominums on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue APN 1100-161-04 Related files General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00269, Development District Amendment DRC2004-00270, , Development Review DRC2004-00268 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration Continued from December 14, 2005 V. NEW BUSINESS G ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00268 -LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request to develop 99 condominiums on 9 68 net acres within the Community Commercial land use designation of the Foothill Boulevard Distracts on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue Land use amendment applications to change the zoning to residential categories are accompanying this application APN 1100-161-04 Related files General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00269, Development District DRC2004-00270, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16882 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negatve Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration Continued from December 14 2005 VI. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS H CONSIDERATION TO INITIATE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2005-01104 CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA-A request by Robert Bathish and Ken Wilson to change the General Plan land use designation from Medium-High (14-24 du/acre) and General Commercial (GC) to Mixed Use for approximately 3 8 acres of land, generally located south of the rail road nght of way to Roberds Court and from Amethyst Avenue east 325 feet -APN 0202-151-20, 0202-161-01, 02, 03, 04, and OS Related Files Development District Amendment DRC2005-01105, Landmark Designation DRC2005-00776 and Landmark Designation DRC2005-00777 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA JANUARY 11, 2006 RANCHO cUCA.yoNCA 2 B VARIANCE DRC2004-01285 - ETCO INVESTMENTS - A request to reduce required lot width and lot depth related to the subdivision of 12 single-family residential homes on 8 9 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of the I-210 Freeway -APN 225-171-19 Related Files Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-00667 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 Continued from December 14, 2005 C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-00764 - ENTREPRENEURIAL RESTAURANTS CORPORATION (LAS CAMPANAS RESTAURANT) - A request to construct a restaurant, with bar, of about 7,200 square feet on Bwlding Pad 'C' of a previously approved commercial/office development in the Industnal Park (IP) District (Subarea 7), located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue -APN 0229-011-69 Related files Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17426 and Development Review DRC2004-01125 On August 25, 2005, a Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Development Review DRC2004-01125 The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration D ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00269 -LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request to change the land use designation from Community Commercial to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) on 9 68 acres on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue APN 1100-161-04 Related files Development D~stnct Amendment DRC2004-00270, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16882, and Development Review DRC2004- 00268 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration This action will be forwarded to the City Council for final action and the date of the Public Hearing before City Councl will be separately noticed Continued from December 14, 2005 E ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2004-00270 -LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request to change the zoning designation from Community Commercial to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling urnts per acre) within the Foothill Boulevard Districts on 9 68 acres on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue APN 1100-161-04 Related files General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00269, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16882, and Development Review DRC2004-00268, Staff has prepared a Mitigated • • Vicinity Map ~ Plannin Commission g January 11, 2006 ~, r -° p ~----------- ----v i -'-~.1 P W ¢ ZO W ~Y S a ~ WIL IN ~0 = ~~ 1 ~ vQi v ~ , ~ Q P~~ ~ Oo 0 i ~ ~ A and B BASE LINE J ~ HURCH ~ > rv D E F and G FOOTHILL Q ARROW W i C 8TH ~ -+ QO - - CO H and I 2 ~ ~ _ ® 3 W N 4TH ~k =Meeting Location: Rancho Cucamonga City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City of Rancho Cucamonga T H E C[ T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATt January 11, 2006 TO• Chairman and Members of the Planrnng Commission FRONk Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner BY' Rozalynne Thompson, Contract Planner SUBJECT• ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16867 - ETCO INVESTMENTS -The proposed subdivision of 8 9 acres of land into 12 residential lots in the Very Low Residential Distnct (1-2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of the I-210 Freeway -APN 0225-171-19. Related File Vanance DRC2004-01285 • VARIANCE DRC2004-01285 - ETCO INVESTMENTS -Requests to reduce the minimum depth of Lot 10 from 200 feet to 180 feet to allow Lot 11 to have frontage along Etiwanda Avenue and to allow Lot 12 to also have frontage along Etiwanda Avenue and a reduced mirnmum width from 90 feet to 75 feet All vanance requests are related to Tentative Tract Map 16867, the subdivision of 12 single family residential homes on 8 9 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of the I-210 Freeway -APN. 225-171-19 Related Fde Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 ANALYSIS The original notice for the Variance did not include the sound wall with a height m excess of 8-feet A continuance is necessary to re-advertise the amended notice within the notice penod as regwred by section 65091 of the Government Code RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that both items be continued to the January 25, 2006 • DC RT/bt ITEMS A & B Acting City Planner Staff Report DATE January 11, 2006 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner BY Mike Smith, Assistant Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-00764 -ENTREPRENEURIAL RESTAURANTS CORPORATION (LAS CAMPANAS RESTAURANT) - A request to construct a restaurant, with bar, of about 7,200 square feet on Bwlding Pad "C" of a previously approved commercial/office development in the Industnal Park (IP) Distnct (Subarea 7), . located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue - APN 0229-011-69 Related files Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17426 and Development Review DRC2004-01125 On August 25, 2005, a Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Development Review DRC2004-01125 The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent protects or minor revisions to protects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zonino North -Vacant, Community Commercal Distract, Terra Vista Community Plan South -Vacant, Industrial Park Distract (Subarea 7) East -Commercial Center, Industnal Parts Distract (Subarea 7) West -Vacant, Industnal Park Distract (Subarea 7) B General Plan Designations Protect Site -Industnal Park North -Community Commercial South - Industnal Park East -Industnal Park West -Industrial Park • ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00764 -ENTREPRENEURIAL RESTAURANTS CORPORATION January 11, 2006 Page 2 BACKGROUND The proposed restaurant is part of a commercial/office center that was previously reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on August 24, 2005 (related file Development Review DRC2004-01125) Identified as "Budding Pad C:'the restaurant will be located at the northeast corner commercal center on Parcel 2 of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17426 This parcel map is currently under separate review and will be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action at a later date The overall protect is part of the larger 140-acre master planned Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park that was conceptually approved by the Planning Commission on April 28, 1999 (related file Development Rewew DR99-11). ANALYSIS A General The building pad area is located immediately adjacent to the southwest corner of the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue Construction has not yet begun on any of the buildings within the surrounding commercal/office center, therefore, d is vacant to the west and south The property across Foothill Boulevard to the north is also vacant To the east is a commercial center that includes, among other uses, Lowes Home Improvement and Islands Restaurant The properties to the south, east, and west are zoned Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) and the properties to the north are zoned Community Commercial District within the Terra Vista Community Plan The subtect property is generally level with no significant slope Vegetation on the site is limited to low grass Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue are both classified as Ma1or Divided . Arterials Although the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan does not have an adopted architectural guideline and material palette, the Planning Commission has stated that the overall quality of architecture for all bwldings within the master plan should be on par with the Lowes Home Improvement store Furthermore, the Planning Commission encourages "signature" architecture at the mator street intersections The proposed architecture is Spanish Mission, specifically the Santa Barbara Mission, and will incorporate elements of those historic structures including faux balconies, raised gables, and elaborate details such as wrought iron window surrounds Further inspiration is derived from the Mission Inn in Riverside B Use Description and Hours of Operation The applicant proposes afull-service "Las Campanas" Mexican restaurant with a full bar. The total floor area will be 7,200 square feet and will include an indoor/outdoor courtyard area (with a retractable roof) of about 1,400 square feet, an indoor dining, reception, bar area of about 3,600 square feet, and kitchen/service areas of about 1,800 square feet Seating for the restaurant and bar will be sufficient for 215 to 235 and 20 to 40 persons, respectively The proposed hours of operation will be Sunday through Thursday from 11 00 a m to 10 00 p m ,and Friday and Saturday from 11 00 a m to 11 00 p m (Exhibit H) No entertainment is proposed. C Compatibility with surroundinos Staff antiapates that the proposed use will fully comply with the performance standards of this development district and will be compatible with existing or proposed commercial development Furthermore, as there are numerous office/warehouse buildings in the general vicinity, the restaurant will fulfill the need for • "supporting" commercal uses in the industrial district as intended by the Development Code Ca PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00764 -ENTREPRENEURIAL RESTAURANTS CORPORATION • January 11, 2006 Page 3 D. Parkins Calculations T e of Use Floor Area s ware feet Parking Ratio Number of Spaces Re wired Number of Spaces Provided Restaurant 6,000 1/100 60 1,200 1 /55' 22 Total 7,200 82 82 'Floor area of restaurants in excess of 6,000 square feet regwres one parking stall per 55 square feet E Grading Committee The Grading Committee reviewed the protect on November 1, 2005, and determined that the proposed grading for the building pad is consistent with the Grading Plan of the Master Plan that was reviewed and approved on July 5, 2005 Therefore, the Committee recommends approval. F Design Review Committee The Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Coleman) reviewed the • protect on November 1, 2005 As the applicant's proposal is architecturally exceptional and will exemplify the "signature" architecture that the Planning Commission encourages at mayor street intersections, the Committee recommended approval subtect to the incorporation of several minor changes, including the addition of decorative paving m the walkway at the south side of the bwlding and integrating the design of the trash enclosure into the budding (Exhibit I) The Design Review Committee's comments and conditions have been incorporated into the attached Resolution of Approval G Technical Review Committee The Technical Review Committee reviewed the protect and recommends approval subject to the conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval H Environmental Assessment The budding site is within the master-planned Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park, a 140-acre commeraal and industrial complex, located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue The design of the protect is in compliance with the approved Master Plan (Development Review DRC99- 11 and Development Review Modification DRC99-11MOD) A Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted for the original Master Plan in April of 1999 Subsequently, in June of 2000, a Mitigation Monitoring Program was adopted by the Planning Commission, and, in February of 2002, a Negative Declaration was adopted for the modification to the original Master Plan (DRC99-11MOD) and the corresponding parcel map for this site (Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15630) The protect will be regwred to implement all pertinent mitigation measures adopted m the previous Negative Declarations, thereby ensuring that any potential impacts of the protect will remain less-than-significant Staff is . of the opinion that no further environmental review is necessary because the protect is (1) consistent with the approved Master Plan and (2) within m the protect scope of the above- cited, prior environmental assessments CJ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00764 -ENTREPRENEURIAL RESTAURANTS CORPORATION January 11, 2006 Page 4 • RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00764 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions Respectfully submitted, Dan Coleman Acting City Planner Attachments Exhibit A -Location Map Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Draft Res - Site Plan - Grading Plan/Sections - Floor Plan - Elevations - Bwldmg Sections/Roof Plan - Landscape Plan - Correspondence from the Applicant - Design Review Committee Action Agenda dated November 1, 2005 - Initial Study Part II elution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00764 u C'~ - - . CHAFFEY-• W, ~. a `CO__LLEGE_L_ G i } r 4 1 j 3 3 ~(ew I_~ fi ~mx ela_--f'°°+°'__ -~ IM.WGIIIIMR _' _-_ _ fiuwrAron iR ~i {~O$Q$ ~ f1MINEL110MYR _ \ ~ _ n.w.J e~ i . ° 8 nol fiR~lURY 6.vRl If/llREiMR 1 WRfY10. ;91i1~10A I>mlR SSM9NL1 i I. ~ ' • G AA ~~ 1 m I ~mexAnovox ,HISTORIC >ifinn~a WINE MUSEUY~ ~.MIERR ~ _ FAT `~-' ~ _ PROJECT SITE ~' _~ `RUTH I tl ~ / YUSSER _ i oAw.reaa s VICTORIA GA. I ~ AVE WAN ~ ~ ~ S' p11XIWR j ~ mre •fvM C.A J fi xvox P~ 4~'P I ~ ' (''~~~~mom.n y[I y^2 / i ,Vl1YY RS .J," ip 3 „R L-- TERRA VISTA RANCHO ~ ~W~R ~ "~ I~ TOWN CENTER °Me"nlaca~i ~ °" ~ CENTER COURT ~ ~ CIIO/MY 'i cm = . HALL _,,, ,,,~ ~ u I , - 1 ~ c ~ F ~L EXHIBIT A ;----~--- - - j " i i ------ ~, ~6 ~' " 1 i ~- v< ~ l11I~ n.~~ ~m~ ~]fll v °~ • ~, ~ ti~ 2! d 3!~ ;~~l~tjjil~ iy ~ ~ ;~e 1, r f ! ~~ !. f!!c ~! 5Y ee j ``-d ! fi f ~!~! ~'~l giS{jsjj~lj == i ~~ ~ 1 11 11 ~~ 11~ip oilf6 aj,fti {{E i }+ F- a ! }d= 1 2 e ca ei nF E:•FB pp~~S'r' S.y[[ ~~ld f~d i~tf ~~{~, 12~~~ ~ cE iEFl i~ y ~ ~kn0 ~SS6e2d s ~;d ! t 1 ~ ~ 1 d r~~° 't~'~r~l~1~'{ ~ !Fd rf 4 !~ !! ! ;111 ~ f3 ~ ~ • ~ t} i j}] ! ! !I~ ~ ~;'± f~ft#`ile ~jl w !lirddl! o ~F '.Fnd'td3~~1f ~ ~lee~"~S. ~ftff~y ~~F€~ey a d F~ 1~~ 3~~ ! 1f~i fiai~f?;itd1 ,~-, 211:1L! 'm ~:~9!~:a~E~~: ! ~ l.Cet rieil is=ead W ~_ I... c m a m Nb mR m' O~ u EXHIBIT B _ c~ • • ~i NVId ONIOV2i0 1Vf11d3~N0~,...... ~ Y ?~ . t ~ .i .m.es~»,~va ~+~> tlIN1J0jIlV0 V0N0WVJf100H0Ntli1 S i ~ - . .N ~U- e ~ ~O 3Atl N3NIllIY1 ONV 0n18 llIH100d 800 M V21f1V15321 SVNHdWV~ SVl ? e ;i ~l i . ! J ,,._. 1 N i `~i ~ li4 ~I , Y} ~ 1 ~ 1 _ I II 11 ..-~ ; ~ z--~.~~ i..' .~ I ~ e fl I '~ Ilil ~I r - - ~ ~ ~ I ~- 'r.=S~ ~~ . ~~=~`~ . ^ \ ' ©~ : I I ~ ^ \ ~, ~. - ~ _ _~ 11 ~ I I I - ` I . _ ___ - - , , -I '~ } 7~ I -=~-=-- ~~ =-T~ J I I e I I a a I1I ,%r ' r1 _ \ J _~- ~y , r' ~- tr ^ ~ Sri ~ ~~.- W .~ I --- ---~__ T ~ ~ -'-'-i I ', 3fw3Ar N3MTI11' ~r i __..__. I _._.' _I .'~YJtvL° ~1 ' ~ ~ , ~.., .I ~~ 1 I~ e _ N M ~ .Y 1 ~!' e I ~} 1 ~ ~ ,j ~'~ i~ 1 , Y I ~~~ f ' , / '{ E I ' i ' ;I 'I _ d~'jl' ~ ~i . ~ ~' - e i ~- 7111' I i~ Ila a~ ~ ~ .. - y :L' ~' I ~ ' ' e ., ~: ^r , n f' tt4! K ~ d ICI W k ~ ~ a ~ .. as o . .' 1~ i - o~ 1 I 9 ~ '$•' ~ t I ~~ W 1, 1 Sa - I Iii I „IL t. O }1 ~ 1~ 1 a Z ~ D f 11 ~ - ' + ~ - h ' } - - I ;I I' ~II i I i Ilt 'I n I .1 + , ~~ ~~ .r ~ i f i' r r ~; I'1 !'b I I I [; PT 'E ~ 1 EXHIBIT C !!E ~ II ~ I ~ ~€ \-J E E d 13.-- __.__ .. _ -"1 ' - ---'~ 7 ~ _ rv~ -- ' I i2~ II ~ ~ ~~ ~ rr _ 1 d I1--. ~-. _ _ ...F 71' _ ..;. _...__ ., J h~'__ - u_...~..>wrac ~C~ e 9 Y ~~ eg 4t 4j a ee a `~ 5~ Ei ,a d ~~ ~ 4 6 E~' !'d S{ ! $! #1 !! i !I l~p~?~~~f~BA ~~Yili Fpll~gd dlj~i~l~~o~~~~ W ddd~~d~~dl~dd, " ®ooo®®®®oe®®o® --- - I ~ I //y •/~~ \ ~ i 1 1 ~ I •_ } ! 9 Y 9 .. Y d ~ p ! ~ ~(fi! ~. E~ S fi ! ~e E __ ~#i6 ~E0 9 ..'sElilY ~~[~ EjP YYYE _ - >>as~~@tdf ad~d~ y- ~"C~~69gid°cv! SL•x-_ -a 9g~6pP~g96YYYS ~~~~~~~~i6i~~~ 000000000®0000 m 2 ~T Y~ v BUILUINL CALLULATIONe ~V" 1 0 -_ - - - - _ i ~ I L~ ~ -- i S ! ~ ~ F ~ I ~ • ~ S S i e p 1 ~ ___~, I _ C3 \y ~ ~~ i _- 1 __ _ ®_ ` A B t ~, ceneaAL xoTes _ _ _~_ ... e,..... ~...~s....,. ~...b~ s~~Aa~....v ~ _ _-_ HALL LECEN~ _i cn~ s Las Campanas SWC Froihlll BIM d MAlllen Ave Raalro GKamoiga CA • FLOOR PLAN • I H Al ° • m 2 ^ ^ V ..Y ~/ ~f0~ NORTH ELEVATIOM1 ~yjlFa sY VV ~~n~ ifs, ~j i rfw/uF~' wavifNl /{mN l~Nyc\ 9lcc /4ry/=, ~ ~\ offs- a' oT'uu~sars \ ~~ GMI/e5rs q COY' \. .. ~t~ ~ ~~ SOOIII GLE~A f10N WEST ELEVATION ~~s.fY F+l/rxfYe~ ~`°' _.. , EAST ELEVATION f,ENFRAL M1llll\ Las Campanas SWC FaxAlll6hd bMilllkm Ave flurAo CuolmnggG BUIIDINC ELEVATInNS 1 ~~ ,aiz GENEML NOTES ~ ^ BUILDING SECTION A I Y` a ICI (mil (~Il a II BUILDING SECTION B ROOF PLAN Las Campanas SWC Fmlhill Bhtl d Mlllikm dve Pancho Cuanwlpa CA ® ROOP PUN M EVIIDINeC SECTIyONS P.1 1 C C~ • • i L n 3 d ~ 'o it ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ d d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~_ ~ ~ F pq~ _® j Y ~j y- y~y 5~ y ~ {t ~~le ! ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ k y 9 ~ +~ S ~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 it 6 ~3 g p g p i S ~ ~ 3 0 ~ E y g ~} 5 a~~ 3~~~'~F~d 9 ~ :3 ~ ~i @ y ~ e4 1 ~- ~ ~ ~ ~3~ `~ ~~y~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6@~ g ~~~e ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ Y ff 5 ~~~~9~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~ p "~l~O $ q ('~,-l, ~k ~a ~tf~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ 3~3 k~~~d • EXHI~ii Q ~ lie w Ala City of Rancho Cucamonga • Community Development Department 10500 Crvrc Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 1 Uniform Application. Supplemental Sheet for Project Descriptton 'b(~~(.~ j ~ Q[) Detailed Description of Proposed Project. Entrepreneurial Restaurants Corporation has entered into a ground lease with Foothill & Milliken JP / PI LLC on the southwest corner or Foothill Boulevazd and Milliken Avenue It is the intent of Entrepreneurial Restaurants Corporation (ERC) to construct and operate an approximately 7,200 squaze foot Las Campanas restaurant on this site The restaurant will be a full service, fine dining Mexican restaurant with a full baz (type 471~quor license) Of the 7,200 squaze feet, rt is estimated that the restaurant will contazn approximately 1,416 squaze feet of indoor / outdoor courtyazd azea, covered by a retractable roof, 3,615 square feet of indoor drmng, reception, and bar azea, krtchen and service azeas of approximately 1,812.5 squaze feet, and restrooms totaling approxrmately 356.5 squaze feet The extenor azchitecture will be m the style of Santa Bazbaza Mission. The buildings extenor will have faux balconies and raised gables reminiscent of a Santa Bazbaza Mission The extenor as well as the indoor /outdoor couriyazd will be lushly landscaped • including water features, upscale paving, and beautiful hazdscape The mtenor of the building will feature a dramatic entrance /reception azea with azeas for wazting as well as food pickup for to-go orders. The ditung azea and bar area will be impeccably decorated featuring the finest quality furniture and fixtures available. The rndoor /outdoor courtyazd will be lushly landscaped providing a true courtyazd dining experience The restaurant will have approximately 215 - 235 seats for dining and 20 - 40 seats for beverage service at the beautifully appointed baz azea Proposed hours of operation will be Sunday- Thursday 11AM to IOPM and Friday and Saturday 11AM to 1 I PM Cunently there ~s a Las Campanas Restaurant located within the H~stonc Mission Inn Hotel m Riverside, CA At that location, the only mtenor portion of the restaurant is the kitchen and service azea All of the dining at the Mission Inn location is outdoors m a very lushly landscaped setting, with water features, fire pits and heaters The menu at the Rancho Cucamonga location will be an expanded version of the offerings at the Mission Inn location The menu will feature traditional Mexican items, with a very upscale touch All of the beef items, such as the steak enchtladas, steak tacos, and steak quesadillas aze prepazed with filet mignon In addition to the core traditional Mexican items, the restaurant will feature prime steaks, done with a Mexican touch, and other less traditional gourmet items. • EXHIBIT H c~a DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7.10 p.m Michael Smith November 1, 2005 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-00764 - ENTREPRENEURIAL RESTAURANTS CORPORATION (LAS CAMPANAS RESTAURANT) - A request to construct a restaurant with bar of about 7,200 square feet on Bwiding Pad C of a previously approved commercial/office development in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7), located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue - APN• 0229-011-69. Related files• Development Revew DRC2004-01125 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17426 Design Parameters The proposed restaurant will be located at the northeast comer of a previously approved commercial and office center (related file. Development Review DRC2004-01125) that will be at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue. The property is part of the 140-acre Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park that includes Lowes Home Improvement specialty retail warehouse and an Islands restaurant This 7,200 square foot restaurant wdl be highly visible because of its location on the site and its proximity to the intersection The proposed "signature" architecture of the restaurant will be distinctive and will differ from that of the other three bwldmgs that will constructed on the site. The architecture is reminiscent of a Spanish mission including white plaster exterior wall finish and red clay barrel tde roofing As the owner of the restaurant also owns the Mission Inn in Riverside, elements and features of that hotel have also been included such as the file dome, arched windows, • and decorative wrought iron window trim and details. Interesting design features include a large dining courtyard with a retractable roof system on the west side of the restaurant, a tower element at the northwest corner, a curved fapade with a fountain at the northeast comer, and a roof height that varies between 15 to 35 feet Access to the site wdl be available wa three entrances The parking requirement for this use was considered during the review of the surrounding area and will be suffiaent to meet anticipated demand. Staff Comments The following comments are intended to prowde an outline for Committee discussion Policv Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion. 1 Provide decorative paving m the walkways along the south side of the building. 2 All roof egwpment shall be screened by parapet walls 3 All trash enclosures should be constructed per the City's design standard for commercial protects. The enclosure and roof trellis should be integrated with the architecture of the budding , Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee approve the proposal. Design Review Committee Action• . Members Present McPhail, Stewart, Coleman Staff Planner Michael Smith The Committee recommended approval EXHIBIT I c13 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00764 2. Related Files: DR99-11, DRCDR99-11MOD, SUBTPM15630, DRC2004-01125, and SUBTPM17426 3. Description of Project: DRC2005-00764 - Entrepreneurial Restaurants Corporation (Las Campanas Restaurant) - A request to construct a restaurant of about 7,200 square feet on Building Pad 'C' of a previously approved commercial/office development in the Industrial Park (IP) District, Subarea 7 located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue, APN 0229-011-69 Staff has found the protect to be within the scope of a previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Momtonng Program adopted by the Plamm~g Commission on April 28, 1999, and June 28, 2000, respectively, and a Negative Declaration adopted by the Planning Commission on February 13, 2002 This protect does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the previous Negative Declarations Related Files DR99-11, DRCDR99-11MOD, SUBTPM15630, DRC20 04-01 1 2 5, and SUBTPM17426 The 5 31-acre site is within the master-planned Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park, a 140-acre commercal and industrial complex located generally at the south side of the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue The design of the protect is in compliance with the approved Master Plan (Development Review DR99-11 and Development Review DRC99-11 MOD) A Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted for the original Master Plan in April of 1999 Subsequently, in June of 2000, a Mitigation Monitoring Program was adopted by the Plamm~g Commission for the original Master Plan (DR99-11) In February of 2002, a Negative Declaration was adopted for modification to the original Master Plan (DRCDR99-11MOD) and the corresponding parcel map for this site and the surrounding area (SUBTPM15630) The protect will be requred to implement all pertinent mitigation measures adopted in the previous Negative Declarations, thereby ensuring that any potential impacts of the protect will remain less-than-significant The Master Plan for the 140-acre site includes a Congestion Management Program/Traffic Impact Analysis (CMP/TIA) The approval of the Master Plan included a Mitigation Monitoring Program, including mitigation of traffic-related impacts, which apply to all protects within the Master Plan A portion of the 140-acre Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park is within potential habitat for the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (DSF) A Habitat Assessment survey for the DSF was performed for a portion of the Corporate Park Master Plan (west of Milliken Avenue) known to contain potential habitat The results of the survey were negative, and the Corporate Park lacks the required Delhi-soils that provide appropriate habitat for the fly The proposed protect site is not located within an area known to be potential habitat for the DSF, and is about 1,500 away from any areas that have been identified as potential habitat for the DSF EXHIBIT J ~'`~ C~ L • Initial Study for Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00764 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Scott Megna Entrepreneurial Restaurants Corporation 3443 Orange Street Rroerside, CA 92501 5. General Plan Designation: Industrial 6. Zoning: Industrial Park Distract, Subarea 7 Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The protect site is at the northeast corner of a vacant parcel that is located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue The parcel, including the subtect site, is currently an abandoned vineyard that has not been farmed for several years The property is part of a larger existing commercial/industrial complex located directly to the east and south that is "anchored" by a Lowe's home improvement store and several businesses on indwidual "pads" including several restaurants (Islands and Farmer Boys) and Union Bank of California Directly to the south is a large industrial warehouse building of about 60,000 square feet The parcels immediately to the west and north across Foothill Boulevard are undeveloped 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga • Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Mike Smith (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None GLOSSARY-The following abbreviations are used m this report: EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model C~5 Initial Study for Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00764 Clty of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mibgation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages ()Aesthetics ()Agricultural Resources ()Air Quality ()Biological Resources ()Cultural Resources ()Geology & Sods ()Hazards & Waste Materials ()Hydrology 8 Water Quality ()Land Use & Planning ()Mineral Resources ()Noise ()Population & Housing ()Public Services ()Recreation () Transportation/Traffic ()Utilities 8 Service Systems ()Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (/) I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pu uant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that ea i r IR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are im pon the roposed protect, nothing further is re/g/wred Prepared By Date ~/ Reviewed By / Date ~Z~7i7'aS • • C-~v Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00764 Page 4 • EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (x) General Plan EIR (Certified October 2000) (x) Master Environmental Assessment for the 2000 General Plan Update (Certified October 2000) (x) Development Review DRC99-11 Mitigated Negative Declaration (Adopted April 1999) (x) Development Review DRC99-11 Mitigation Momtonng Program (Adopted June 2000) (x) Development Revew DRC99-11 MOD Negative Declaration (Adopted February 2002) • (x) SUBTPM15630 Negative Declaration (Adopted February 2002) (x) Retail Portion of the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Site Speafic Traffic Analysis, RKJK & Assoaates Inc ,May 2000 (Adopted February 2000) I~ C~~ RESOLUTION NO 06-01 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-00764, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A RESTAURANT, WITH BAR, OF ABOUT 7,200 SQUARE FEET ON BUILDING PAD "C" OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED COMMERCIAUOFFICE DEVELOPMENT IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 7), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND MILLIKEN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN 0229-011-69 A Rentals 1 Entrepreneunal Restaurants Corporation (Las Campanas Restaurant) filed an application for the issuance of Development Review DRC2005-00764, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 11th day of January 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on said application and concluded said meeting on that date All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced meeting on January 11, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application applies to a building pad with an area of about 14,000 square feet at the northeast comer of a parcel of about 231,000 square feet (5 31 acres) located in the Industnal Park District (Subarea 7) at the southwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue, and b The building pad area is part of a previously approved protect, Development Review DRC2004-01125, that was reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on August 24, 2005, which in turn is part of an existing master planned commercial and Industnal complex of 140 acres that is anchored by Lowes Home Improvement (warehouse retail); and c Construction has not yet begun on any of the bwldings within the surrounding project area and, therefore, it is vacant to the west and south The property across Foothill Boulevard to the north is also vacant To the east is a commeraal centerthat includes, among other uses, Lowes Home Improvement and Islands Restaurant, and d The application contemplates the construction of a restaurant with afull-service bar • with a floor area of 7,200 square feet, and C~" PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-01 DRC2005-00764 -ENTREPRENEURIAL RESTAURANTS CORPORATION January 11, 2006 Page 2 • e The hours of operation will be Sunday through Thursday from 11 00 a m. to 10 00 p m ,and Friday and Saturday from 11 00 a m to 11 00 p m ,and f The architecture of the restaurant exemplifies the high-quality design that has been established along Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue The architecture is inspired bythe early Califomia/Spanish missions, speafically the Santa Barbara Mission, and includes design details that were derived from the Mission Inn in Riverside, and g The Planning Commission previously approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration on April 28, 1999, for the 140-acre Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan, of which this site is a part Furthermore, the Planning Commission previously issued a Negative Declaration for the update of the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15630 on February 13, 2005, of which this site is a part There have been no substantial changes in the area to warrant further environmental review, and 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed uses are in accord with the General Plan, the obtectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located b. The proposed uses, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially in/unous to properties or improvements in the vicinity. • c The proposed uses comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 4 Environmental rewew was completed for this site and the surrounding development and corresponding Parcel Map SUBTPM15630 approved by the Plamm~g Commission on April 28, 1999, and February 13, 2005, respectively The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been adopted, no further environmental review is required for subsequent protects within the scope of the Mitigated Negative Declaration The proposed development is within the scope of the poor Mitigated Negative Declaration and Negative Declaration, as the site was always planned for development with a development of this type and the size and scope have not changed. Accordingly, no further environmental review is necessary. Based upon the facts and information contained in the prior Mitigated Negative Declaration and Negative Declaration, togetherwith written and oral staff reports, the Planning Commission finds that there are no substantial changes in the protect orthe site and its surrounding conditions that would require revision to the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration or Negative Declaration All environmental mitigation measures from the previously approved and updated Master Plan and parcel map shall apply to this protect 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Plannina Department 1) Approval is for the construction of a restaurant and barwith a floor area • of 7,200 square feet in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue - APN 0229-011-69 and 0208-961-05. C - °I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-01 DRC2005-00764 -ENTREPRENEURIAL RESTAURANTS CORPORATION January 11, 2006 . Page 3 2) No outdoor seating is permitted outside the limits of the walled building area and the retractable roof 3) Downspouts shall not be visible from the extenor on any elevations of the buildings All downspouts shall be routed through the mtenorofthe building walls 4) A minimum of 82 parking stalls shall be provided 5) The Foothill Boulevard frontage and intersection with Milliken Avenue shall include the following design elements per the Activity Center design as adopted by the Foothill Boulevard/Histonc Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan These elements shall be installed pnor to occupancy of the restaurant • At the comer, use decorative pavement extending to 40 feetfrom the intersection Use accent integral colored concrete with bnck paver accent bands • At the corner, plant a background grove of specimen Date Palm trees 20 feet on center At the comer, provide speaal public Route 66 artwork as . specified in the Foothill Boulevard/Histonc Route 66 Visual Improvement Master Plan • Along the Foothill Boulevard frontage, near the intersection, provde three Route 66 icons at approximately 30 feet on center as specified m the Foothill Boulevard/Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Master Plan • Along the Foothill Boulevard frontage, use formal streetscape design including 10-foot wide (minimum) accent integral colored concrete sidewalk with double rows of bnck paver bands (approximately 10 feet wide by 15 feet long gnd pattern) Crape Myrtle trees shall be planted within 4-foot by 4-foot tree wells vnth grates spaced 30 feet on center along both sides of the sidewalk Provide decorative posts and cables behind the sidewalk along the Foothill Boulevard street frontage as specified m the Foothill Boulevard/Histonc Route 66 Visual Improvement Master Plan 6) The facility shall be operated in conformance with the performance standards as defined in the Development Code including, but not limited to, noise levels 7) Any modification of the operating hours or days, or any intensification of the use beyond what is specifically approved by this Conditional Use Permit shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission . ti) No entertainment is allowed under this permit A separate application for an entertainment permit is regwred for any entertainment as defined by Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapter 5 12 Cao PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-01 DRC2005-00764 -ENTREPRENEURIAL RESTAURANTS CORPORATION January 11, 2006 Page 4 9) If operation of the restaurant or bar causes adverse effects upon adtacent businesses or operations, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the City Planner for consideration and possible termination of the use 10) Retaining walls shall be constructed of decorative masonry (i a slump stone, split-face, or stucco to match the budding) 11) Decorative paving shall be provided m the walkways along the south side of the bwldmg. 12) London Plane, California Sycamore, and Flowenng Plum trees shall be planted along the Foothill Boulevard frontage landscape setback behind the nght-of-way 13) Landscaping shall be installed pnor to release for occupancy 14) Any signs proposed for the conformance with the City's Sign Sign Program, and shall regwr Planner pnor to installation restaurant shall be designed in Ordinance, the applicable Umforrn e review and approval by the City Enaineenng Department 1) Install Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements in accordance with City "Mayor Dmded Artenal" standards including a) Provide Activity Center sidewalk treatment, Foothill Boulevard decorative streetlights, and street trees in accordance with the Foothill Boulevard Distracts Chapter of the Consolidated Development Code and the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan (Street Tree Requirement Forrn previously provided) b) Protect existing traffic signal egwpment, signing, stnpmg, and all other Public improvements along Foothill Boulevard, or repairas required by the City Engineer 2) Dnve approach at the west property Ime on Foothill Boulevard shall conform to City Standard Drawing Number 101, Type "C " Minimum width for a commeraal dnve approach is 35 feet (measured at the right-of-way Ime) a) Traffic Engineer shall approve the location of re-aligned or new streetlights m wamty of proposed dnve approach Streetlights should align across Foothill Boulevard b) The proposed dnve approach should not interfere with the existing 90-foot taper for the eastbound nght-turn lane onto southbound Milliken Avenue c) The proposed Foothill Boulevard drive approach will be partially off-site Prior to building permit issuance, obtain and provide the • • l.~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-01 DRC2005-00764 -ENTREPRENEURIAL RESTAURANTS CORPORATION January 11, 2006 . Page 5 necessary access easements to construct the dnve approach off- site Also, include /oint access easement in favor of the property to the west on Tentative Parcel Map 17426 (SUBTPM17426) If building permits precede the Tentative Parcel Map, then provide the access easement by separate document 3) Milliken Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Ma/or Divided Artenal" standards including a) Protect existing curb and gutter, dnve approach and streetlights or replace/repair as required by the City Engineer b) Provide Activity Center sidewalk treatment and street trees in accordance with the Foothill Boulevard Distncts Chapter 17 32 of the Consolidated Development Code and the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan (see previously provided Street Tree Reqwrement Form) On Milliken Avenue, Actmty Center sidewalk treatment shall extend to the first dnveway south of Foothill Dnveway approaches to Milliken Avenue are to be in accordance with City standard Minimum width for a commercial dnve approach is 35 feet, measured at the nght-of-way Sidewalk shall cross the dnve approach at the zero curb face per City standard • c) Extend the existing southbound bus bay and combine with the nght-tum lane for the proposed dnve approach on Milliken Avenue Dedicate additional nght-of-way at least 7-feet wide measured from the curb face along the right-tum lane and provide sidewalk easements as necessary to encompass the Activity Center and curvilinear sidewalk along portion(s) of Milliken Avenue beyond the Actroity Center limit d) Protect existing traffic signing and stnping along Milliken Avenue, or repair as required by the City Engineer e) Protect existing traffic signal egwpment in Milliken Avenue f) Protect existing R-26(s) signs or replace as required g) Re-stripe Milliken Avenue for four southbound through lanes separate from the bus bay/right-tum lane for the two protect dnveways 4) All dnveways shall have dnve approaches, not cross gutters and access ramps Sidewalks shall cross dnve approaches at the zero curb face 5) No new private storm drain lateral across Milliken Avenue will be allowed Redesign the on-site pnvate storm drain to utilize existing facilities on the west side of Milliken Avenue On-site grading and • pnvate storm drain improvements shall tie into existing catch basins north of Century Court or be designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer caa PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-01 DRC2005-00764 -ENTREPRENEURIAL RESTAURANTS CORPORATION January 11, 2006 Page 6 6) An in-lieu fee for one-forth the cost of constructing special pavers within the Foothill Boulevard/Milliken Avenue intersection shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits The fee amount shall be based on the square footage of the intersection 7) Provide sidewalk easements to encompass all Activity Center treatments and sidewalks that cross drive approaches outside existing rights-of-way Sidewalk easements between the two dnve approaches on Milliken shall be sufficient to allow curvilinear sidewalk 8) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of the curb to 1/2-foot beyond the right-of-way along all street frontages Join to on-site grades beyond the right-of-way with maximum 2'1 slope Sidewalks shall cross dnve approaches at the zero curb face Driveway accent pawng on-site shall not extend into the public right-of-way 9) No new median openings will be allowed m Milliken Avenue or Foothill Boulevard 10) Reference Parcel Map 15295 for vehicular ingress/egress rights on Parcel 1 Prepare legal documents to revise vehicular access rights to vacate non-vehicular access to Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue for the proposed new dnve approaches. 11) Provide a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and identify applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the Grading Plan The WOMP dated September 2005 has been reviewed. The following items need to be completed prior to grading permit issuance a) Section 1 2 -Provide permit numbers for the following Tractor Parcel Number DRC Number PMT Number WDID Number b) Section 1 3 -Indicate whether a Properly Owner's Assoaation (POA) will be formed If so, describe the responsibilities of the POA c) Section 6 - Notarize and record the City's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan " (Copies are available at the Engineering front counter) 12) Prepare or amend existing CC&Rs as needed, to preserve shared access, maintenance, and surface drainage agreements with the property to the south Provide a completed copy to the City Engineering prior to obtaining building permits ~J • u Ca3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-01 DRC2005-00764 -ENTREPRENEURIAL RESTAURANTS CORPORATION January 11, 2006 . Page 7 13) Maintenance of BMPs identified in the WOMP shall be addressed in the protect Covenants, Conditions, and Restnctions (CC&Rs) Environmental Mdiaation 1) The applicant shall implement all pertinent mitigation measures adopted in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan (DR99-11) adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in Apnl of 1999, and Modification to the Master Plan (DRCDR99-11 MOD) and Parcel Map (SUBTPM15630) adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in February of 2002 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman • ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of January 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS n L} COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-00764 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: ENTERPRENEURIAL RESTAURANTS CORPORATION (LAS CAMPANAS RESTAURANT) LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND MILLIKEN AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Com lehon Da 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/ /_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 06-01, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Archdect B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use / /_ has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, ail Conditions _/_/~ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner ca5 Protect No DRC2005-00764 Completion Date 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bulding permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of bulding permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adtacent properties. 6 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subfect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete • or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 All bwlding numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination D. Shopping Centers 1 Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 2 The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours 3 Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only " 4 All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants a Noise Level -All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 60 d6 during the hours of 10 p m until 7 a m and 65 dB during the hours of l a m until 10 p m b Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar obfects between the hours of 10 p m and 7 a m unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area 5 Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof Full samples shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits _~-~- _/___J- ~_~- ~_~_ _J_J ~-J- ~~- ~-~- _1___J- ~-~ --~ ~- ~-~- ~-~- / / 2 cap Protect No DRC2005-00764 Comolehon Date E. F. G. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program It shall include the plaza area hghung fixtures, budding fighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot fightng fixtures Building Design All roof appurtenances, including av conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adlacent properties and streets as requred by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in building plans For commercial and industrial prolects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main bulding colors. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long W hen a side of any parking space abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adlacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be prowded throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards 5 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped 6 Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet Trip Reduction Bicycle storage spaces shall be prowded in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily residential prolects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provde bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100 Where this results to a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number Transit improvements such as bus shelters, bus pullouts, and bus pads shall be provided Bus shelters shall also include a bench, a trash receptacle, and an adjoining bike rack (minimum 3 capacity) on a concrete pad Bus shelter shall be located outside public right-of-way and shall be privately maintained -/~- • ~~- ~_/- -/-/- ~~- ~~_ ~~- -/~~ ~~- ~-/- -1-/- `J cap Protect No DRC2005-00764 Comolellon Date • H. Landscaping and model home landscaping in e lantin din slo l l t d / / p g g p an, inc u irriga ion p 1 A detailed landscape an _ _ _ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdiwsion 2 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial protects, and a minimum of 30% within _/_/_ commercial and office protects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger 3 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking ~_/_ stalls 4 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adtacent to and along structures at a rate of one ~_/_ tree per 30 linear feet of building 5 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/~_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 6 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 6 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater _/_J- slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area l -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy • 7 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in _/_/_ the required landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department 8 Speaal landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering _/_/_ sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is regwred along Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue 9 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/~_ perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 10 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the prinaples of _/_/_ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. I. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval ___)_/_ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall requve separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs 2 A Uniform Sign Program or amendment to the existing Uniform Sign Program for this _/_/_ development shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits J. Environmental 1 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the _/~_ • issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if cas Protect No DRC2005-00764 Comolellon Date appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report • 2 The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of ~~ the acoustical report were implemented In construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with Cary standards Certification shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes 3 Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/~_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Ctty Planner in the amount of $495 00 prior to the Issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds maybe used bythe Crryto retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions regwred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit K. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location ~ /_ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to Clty Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) • L. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following ~-/- a Site/Plot Plan; b Foundation Plan; c Floor Plan; d Ceiling and Roof Framing Pian, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) Including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, waterand waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Plannrng Department Protect Number (DRC2005-00764) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/~_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are requved prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and W orkers' Compensation coverage to _/~_ the City prior to permit issuance • 4 Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls ~-/- 5 caq Protect No DRC2005-00764 Comolenon Date • • • 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued bythe _/_/_ Building and Safety Department M. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the protect file number (DRC2005-00764) The applicant shall complywith the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Budding and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or ~~_ mator addition, the applicant shall pay development tees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to- City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map ~~_ recordation and pnor to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p.m and 6 30 a.m Monday ~~_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public ~~ counter) N. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/~_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Bulding Code for required occupancy separations ~~_ 3 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC ~~_ Section 1505 4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A ~~_ 5 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed ~~_ O. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with Califomia Bulding Code, City Grading ~_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Califomia to ~_/_ pertorm such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the ~~_ time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/ submitted, and approved by the Bulding and Safety Official prior to the issuance of budding permits C Protect No DRC2005-00764 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: P. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved 2 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring tolnt maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC 8 R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 3 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City 4 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs Q. Street Improvements Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Foothill Boulevard X X X X X X (e) Milliken Avenue X X X X X X (e) Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) Right-turn lane and bus bay required Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Crnl Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits requred c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduct, and interconnect condwt shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal condwt with pull boxes shall be installed wcth any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Condwt shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engmeer Completion Date u ~~- ~~- ~~- -/~- ~~ • _/_1- ~~- ~~- _/J. ~~ 7 CJI Protect No DRC2005-00764 f Existing Clty roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with • adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engrneer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single faintly residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. Install street trees per Ciry street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the true page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating °Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1)-" Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Project Engineer • • Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Gty FOOTFALLBOULEVARD Actmry Centers Lagerstroemia indite Crape Myrtle HYb^d - 3 tt 15 N o c 24-inch FIO-n 'Muskogee' Lavender Triangular spacing box FOOTFALL BOULEVARD Non-actrviry centers Accent tree Prunus blueiana NCN 3 ft 20 ft o c 24-inch Informal groupings box not more than 25 % of total frontage trees Non-activity centers Platenus racemosa Caldomia Sycamore 8 ft 35 ft o c informal groupings 15-gat Non-activity centers Platanus acerifolia London Plane Tree 8 ft 30 tt o c informal groupings 15-gal MILLIKEN AVENUE South of FooNill Llquidambar Amerx:an Sweet Gum 8 tt 25 o c min 15-gal Boulevard sryreciflua - 30 % Informal groupings 15-gal Brechychyiton Bottle Tree 8 ft 25 tt o,c populous - 70% Informal groupings Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with Ctty standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Completion Date -/-~- -/~- _/~- ~~_ ~~_ 8 c~a Protect No DRC2005-00764 Completion Date 5 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with _/_/_ adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or • industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required R. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting _/~_ Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of bulding permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 2 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective ~_/_ Beautification Master Plan Milliken Avenue The City Engineer as well as the City Planner shall review on-site landscape plans S. Drainage and Flood Control 1 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the ~~_ property from adtacent areas T. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/ /_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary ~~- 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the regwrements of the ~~ Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the ~ Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is requred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved- ~~_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any regwrements that may be received from them U. General Requirements and Approvals 1 An easement for a toint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of _/~_ building permits, whichever occurs first, for Foothill Boulevard 2 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the Ciry, covering the estimated operating costs for all ~~_ new streetlights forthe first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved 3 Prior to the issuance of bulding permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall ~_/_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first bulding permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect • C 33 Protect No DRC2005-00764 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR • COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: V. Security Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with direct lighting to be provided by ail entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the enure development 3 Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. W. Security Hardware One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, or alarmed X. Windows 1 All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be Irfted from frame or track in any manner 2 Storefront windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic 3 Security glazing is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and impede entry to burglars Y. Building Numbering Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility Z. Alarm Systems Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed Instructing management and employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriff's dispatch number (909) 941-1488 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED s ~~- / / ~~- ~-/- _~-~ _/~_ / / -~-~- ~~- ~_~- ~~- ,o ~~ ~~ ~~"`,,,;,~~. Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ~~: ' Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS September 19, 2005 Las Campanas Restaurant SWC Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue (PM 17426 Lot 2) DRC2005-00764 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a The maximum distance between fire hydrants incommercial/industrial protects is 300- feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet. b. Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: i. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways. u At intersections. ui On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. ro As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. v. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building. c If any portion of a facility or budding is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or budding, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. d. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof. C35 FSC-2 Fire Flow • 1 The required minimum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 1,500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system m accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring. This requirement is made m accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to prowde the required fire flow subtect to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to prowde regwred fire flow. 3. Firewater plans are required for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground • supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in: Assembly and Educational Occupancy Buildings. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or standards) requires an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system. Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Budding Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code 2. Prior to any removal, remodel, modification and/or additions to the building or suite's fire alarm system, Fire Construction Seances' approval and a budding permit must be obtained. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 3 Based on the number of sprinkler heads; the sprinkler system is required to monitored by a . listed central station fire alarm system. 2 al FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire . Lanes Standard 9-7 1 Location of Access: All portions of the structures ist story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the budding. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. b The maximum inside turn radius shall be 20-feet c. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 46-feet. d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f At any private entry median, the mirnmum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side • g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle werght (GVW). Trees and shrubs planted adiacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 3. Access Doorways• Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows. a In buddmgs without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Budding Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards 4 Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all regwred budding exterior openings 5 CommerciaUlndustrial Gates Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2 The following design requirements • apply 3 C 37 a Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval Upon the completion of the • installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS b Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. c Gates may be motorized or manual d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20 00. f Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. g The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be egwpped with a manual override device and afad-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism m case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motorized gates shall be egwpped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate m a visible and unobstructed location. i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the • complex. ~ If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be regwred due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 6. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 7 Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or budding construction Plan check submittal is regwred with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be regwred for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the fudgment of • the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property • Candles and open flames in public assemblies 4 C3g • Compressed Gases • Public Assembly • • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • Liquefied Petroleum Gases • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved pnor to construction of buildings and/or the installation of egwpment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous matenals in accordance with the 2001 California Budding, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire Distract "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation 1 Reciprocal Access Agreement The plan as submitted indicate that the regwred Fire . Department access• a Is located on property which is not under the control of the applicant, or b. Crosses a property line; or c. Is shared by multiple owners; or d. Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire Distract The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, budding or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire Distract approval. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino To assist Fire Construction Services in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal• a The current title reports to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all • properties included in the agreement. 5 C3q b The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subject to the agreement . c A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn radu and slope of roadway surface shall be provided The access roadway shall comply with the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. 2 Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement The plans as submitted indicate that a regwred private fire mains or appurtenances a. Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant; or b Crosses a property line, or c. Provide service to adjacent properties, or d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association; or e Is shared by multiple owners Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the pnvate water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection egwpment essential to the water supply. The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract The agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded within the • Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or budding permits. Chronoloaical Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems• The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the prroate water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards Approval of the on-site (pnvate) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any budding permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delroering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped • 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire 6 C~~ District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard 9-8. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 4. Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be receroed. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: • 1 Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflectroe Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2 Private Fire Hydrants. For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hinng the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3 Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subiect to the release of power). • 7 Cy 1 5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted • and/or equipment is placed in service 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPp Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reaprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 9. Address: Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the budding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non- . illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks inmulti-tenant commercial and industrial buildings The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all swtes. 10 Hazardous Materials• Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division. The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services 11. Confidential Business Occupancy Information• The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subfect building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 12. Mapping Site Plan• Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'/z" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and budding features as required in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire • Inspector. 8 c4a T H E C I T Y O F R A N C ti O C U C A M O N G A StaffReport DATE January 11, 2006 TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner BY Larry Henderson AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00269 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request to change the land use designation from Community Commeraai to Medwm Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) on 9 68 acres on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue APN 1100-161-04 Related files Development Review DRC2004-00268, Development Distract DRC2004-00270, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16882 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2004-00270 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request to change the zoning designation from Community Commercial to Medwm Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) within the Foothill Boulevard Districts on 9 68 acres on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue APN 1100-161-04 Related files Development Review DRC2004-00268, General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00269, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16882 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16882 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request for a seven numbered and two lettered lot subdivision of 9 68 acres for 99 condominiums on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue APN 1100-161-04 Related files Development Review DRC2004-00268, General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00269, Development Distract Amendment DRC2004-00270 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00268 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request to develop 99 condominwms on 9 68 net acres within the Community Commeraal land use designation of the Foothill Boulevard Districts on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue Land use amendment applications to change the zoning to residential categories are accompanying this application APN 1100-161-04 Related files General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00269, Development District DRC2004-00270, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16882 ITEMS D, E, F, G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00268 THROUGH -00270 AND SUBTT16882 - LEWIS INVESTMENT CO. January 11, 2006 Page 2 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION • A Protect Density 10 23 dwelling units per net acre B Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Apartments, Etiwanda Speafic Plan, Medium Density (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South - Foothill Boulevard, Single-Family Residential, Low Density (2-4 dwelling units per acre), Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Community Commeraal East - Vacant with Utility Overhead Power Lines and temporary Flood Water Retention Basin, Foothill Boulevard Speafic Plan, Commeraal Office West - Vacant, underutilized with some single-family residences and commeraal uses, designated Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, Community Commeraal C General Plan Designations Protect Site -General Commeraal existing, with Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) proposed North - Medum Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling urnts per acre), General Commeraal East - Office West - General Commeraal D. Site Characteristics The site is generally flat site and drains to the south The property to the north is elevated via a retaining wall approximately 4 to 5 feet higher than the subtect property In addition, a Metropolitan Water District easement across the Foothill Boulevard frontage imposes restrictions on the location and types of trees that can be allowed E Parking Calculations Visitor Number Spaces of Visitor Requred Number of Number Ratio Spaces Square Parking Spaces of Spaces Required Provided Type of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided ep r Unit ep r Unit 33 2bd/ 2 bth 1,335 1 8 60 66 25 .38 (1 covered) (30 covered) 33 3bd/2 5 bth 1,803 2 66 66 .25 38 33 3bd/2 5 bth 1,920 2 66 66 25 38 TOTAL 192 198 25 38 ANALYSIS A General The site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, approximately 500 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue, and is characterized by developed Medum density apartments to the north, vacant Office Commeraal to the east, single-family Low density across Foothill Boulevard to the south, and underutilized commeraal and residential uses zoned Community Commeraal to the west. This protect will be of a similar design and size to neighboring apartment development to the north The protect will become a part of 17,E,F, G a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00268 THROUGH -00270 AND SUBTT16882 - LEWIS INVESTMENT CO January 11, 2006 Page 3 the larger community The protect site land use designation is currently Community Commercial with Medium Density Residential proposed The design utilizes a tri-plex building with double loaded drive aisles and pedestrian court yards with strong architectural elements that emphasize the vintner heritage of the area The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and Improvement Plan B Site Design The site design includes a Master Plan for the adtoinmg area to the west and east since those are proposed to remain General Commercial and Office The Master Plan does illustrate that the proposed uses and the requested amendment could reasonably work together and should not be detrimental to the ultimate development of the area C Architectural Design The theme of the proposed residential property supports the Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan while providing a vineyard architectural theme which is complimentary The community buildings and gates are of a vintner style architecture The triplex building units are of a traditional craftsman and Spanish revwal styles which is highly compatible and should establish a rich tapestry for the neighborhood D Design Review Committee Reviewed and recommended for approval on November 15, 2005 E Technical Review Committee Reviewed and recommended for approval with conditions . on November 15, 2005 F Grading Committee On November 15, 2005, the Committee reviewed and recommended approval with the condition for the protect to accept the runoff from the west property G Environmental Assessment An Initial Study and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared and is recommended for adoption FACTS FOR FINDING General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00269 Fact -General Plan Goal 2 6 1 3 2 states," Restrict step commercial development m favor of more focused commercial or mixed-use centers " Discussion We have some stop commercial development because of the shape and size of some parcels of land along arterial highways We would like to see those parcels consolidated so they can be more efficiently developed and avoid tralf~c conflicts caused by multiple driveways. We have used master planning of land to good advantage to avoid expanding step centers We wdl continue to use creative planning tools to restrict step development. Although not a true mixed use center, the amendment wtll break up the commercial strip make-up of this section of Foothtll Boulevard and, therefore, supports the intent of this goal and discussion in the General Plan Therefore, this amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the distract in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development D,E,F,G 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00268 THROUGH -00270 AND SUBTT16882 - LEWIS INVESTMENT CO January 11, 2006 Page 4 2 Fact - General Plan Goal 2 6.1 3 9 states, "Allow medium and high density residential uses along transit routes in mixed-use areas and in the vicinity of actwity centers " Discussion We need the diversity of housing provided by these residential categories and would like to reinforce increased transit use where that is feasible. The synergy between more intensive residential uses and such activities as recreation centers, cultural faalities, entertainment centers and commeraal areas serves to give our cit¢ens a greater lifestyle choke than is afforded by exclusively single-family residential development Foothill Boulevard is a transit route and is in the vicinity of the activity center identified at the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard Therefore, this amendment promotes the goals and obfectwes of the Land Use Element 3 Fact -The Master Plan clearly demonstrates that the proposed use is designed with a high degree of compatibility through landscape setback buffers and pedestrian walkway connections to adfacent commercial designated areas Therefore, this amendment would not be materially infunous or detrimental to the adfacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties Development District Amendment DRC2004-00270 1 Fact -The size and configuration of the property and the submitted Master Plan and . all other evidence demonstrates that the Development District Amendment is suitable for the uses allowed under the General Plan as amended under DRC2004-00268 and compatible with the surrounding existing and proposed uses 2 Fact -The proposed Development District Amendment is consistent with the General Plan Designation as proposed for amendment DRC2004-00269 and all applicable goals and policies of the General Plan 3 Fact -The submitted Master Plan and all other evidence demonstrates that the Development Distract Amendment would not be materially infunous or detrimental to the adfacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16882 Fact -That the tentative tract map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans as amended by the previously referenced applications Fact -The design and master plan of the tentatwe tract map has demonstrated consistency with the General Plan, Development Code, as amended by the previously referenced applications Fact -The environmental record and the design of the subdivision demonstrates it is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable infury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, or cause serious health problems PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00268 THROUGH -00270 AND SUBTT16882 - LEWIS INVESTMENT CO January 11, 2006 . Page 5 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00268 1 Fact -The Architectural Plans, including the Master Plan, demonstrates that the proposed protect is consistent with the obfectives of the General Plan as amended, and the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the distract as amended in which the site is located 2 Fact - As amended by the previously referenced land use applications and the information in the Architectural Plans, including the Master Plan, demonstrates that the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 3 Fact -The Architectural Plans, including the Master Plan, demonstrates that the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site RECOMMENDATION Approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16882 and Development Review DRC2004-00268 and fonruard a recommendation of approval to the City Council for . action on General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00269 and Development District Amendment DRC2004-00270 Respectfully submitted, Dan Coleman Acting City Planner DC LH\ma Attachments Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Location Map Master Plan Site Utilization Map Tentative Tract Map Conceptual Grading Plan Detailed Site Plan Elevations and Floor Plans Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution Recommending Approval for General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00269 Draft Resolution Recommending Approval for Development Distract Amendment DRC2004-00270 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16882 • Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2004-00268 :' e r 11 i~ ~, v ~ 1 s.'~ .~~~ `' ,L r'":~~~.,'~ ~~ .°w'-~7~.±rtfi~' ~••~ r~ LnY ~ f ,~.~~s, ~' ..,, ~~~. U' AMADOR ON ROUTE 66 SUBTT 16882, DRC2004-00268 ~~ `= "~ ~{ •~ r~ F G~ / .-~ V~ ~~, 3 ~~ '4i ~~ .x ; ,:• ~ a~r, ~• :~ ~, EXHIBIT A - `ter ~~~„~ '~ ~~ 4= ~' ,. t.:~ = s y;` ~ a. ~, ~~~ 1 ~~ ` ~' 1, i • ~ ~ ~ ~, i 1y , r ~`~ = k "S : L ~~ .`" ~ r ~ ~`y (t~yr ~~ ~~':[r1 ~. „~ - d ..:.n~am ~ee~ D,~,F, ~ ~ m ~ _ ~ ~ - s -o- i I - ~ ~ ~-~~, _ ~~.,~ ~ ~~ V ~I .,1, d~.lli i{x.l~'='bY;~alt~el~{e1° d ~ .. ~ G~ Do i ^JW a~ - - - ~6~:, ~ I i ~. / ~~y~~ H J 1J _ ° fS'd f V~Qi P~. ~ t ~~ `~ / . ,d f a~ vE~~`~1y. r:J J < _- -_ _ _ _;, -_ -_ FOOIHILL_ _ - _ --_ -BOVLEJgp~~_~_ _ _ , _ -___ ~ _ _ __ I _ _ ! ~_ s PRELIMINARY MASTER PLAN Lewls O eratin Co AMADOR On Route 66 p g rP SCHEME 1 ~~ g ~ a..'o `~~. `~'.C.`,.~~ 1156 N Mountain Avenue ~ r) - ~,-,-•, _, Upland, CaLfomda 91786 TENT TR/1CT 16gg2 ar~cnsFa ~sunrrinxx~~ (909) 9A5-09]I CITY OF RANCHO CU(,AMONOA, (,ALIFORNIA oeao os w nu fYll `iNYWI m xor v~ ~raa xruanr r asu JI7 :INYdlIG7 1N371F3AM SLN31 h A m ~ ~~ ~_ ~ ~~ ~ e ~U ~ ~ ee ~~ ~ ~~~ 4~ ~` ~~ tl t0 ti i e2 • ~ ~ a GLI 6l SP9'I'IIXCYO zaaswens~+uruy NOIL bZl7LLl) 31/S mvo My mov ruoum awn EXHIBIT C~,a.._.~_._ o E,F ~g 49A~J W .' yd'/yy/°~~~~~~M~ f ~' a~ w.m ~-P. r~ suns p amn w m ve 3uslr w2ma' x nu an :wra~rro iv3n~ scan .. ~~ ! ~ i ~ ~ ~ ni ' ~ !~ ~ __ .. A 1 d ~~ r e i i ~ 1 I el IliriQ t~!(! ~fl~! ~~i!! u' ~l Ilap_!,~i ~~4~~~1 r r t1 ~~idiii~~ ~i~i~ '~lli~ 1" d mill i0~lii t 9 ~ c ' b ~2 ~li~ ~ ~~W liar a ~ ~a ®~g to i ~a E i " 1 i - -, : ~~ `~ nr u~a~ svre+xa mo-an wrb -e`~~ ~- iaasucens uru awnNn . 3A1L6'1J1HL a~•unnlr .ti ,, iY i< I - t n ~ - ~,- --~--~-~ .3-I t . ~« ~ i« p III f-' l ~~I I I ~;~!!~~ ~ E ~ ~+~ ~~ 1 x_ _ ' II ~ ~ e a ~ .~ I t II ~ / • ~ II '~ !&f k E' t'I I I1 i~ E. a ~ M . ~ I ~° I I! EXH~~IT ® D,E,~,G q ..~,_ aev-e~ rm~u an tal vi aar~r NrfMltlrl r1LJl X71 NHYdif0.7 lN3RISfAM SL%77 ,~, eaMa ~,~, ~-.. M. °° -~as~n- Nt~7d Ek1~01>FfJ mnsutenr vrxt 3nunxu -j y/1~'~ i~&KVedQ7g1Y mmm are mue re mar V ~~ ' 9 I ~ A! i •i ~~1 a ~ ~ r ! ~~,,16 t! Rj ;_ ~ r~ ~~ i~ 1 i ~~~,r ~~~ i ~~~r ~ ~i~o ri EA i :: ~~ il~!l,1i I iE !i~ ~~ rl~iii' i~° ~ = rril Iri! geEaB rtgii! i~~ Il~n~~~l~' gold! !.'.c !pt 1LE rllirir6 ill it .I a ~ Iliirl 1!!ir I1111'lirr ~ Eai~eaae~pap r ! I ~1 . ~e.m II~~ U ~ ~' ~ i ~2~~~ i ~~~~~ eaaaa ~ as ~~g t~ ~~ ~1s ~ 9 1 EXHIBIT E i l , p, E, F, G io r e \ / ~ 1 - _ `\• ~d If(i 11 k i~ I • M ti wry/~ M/Y aI1~N -IILOJd hOl-I(1 M oen-ae faU and ~ ~ N avtre n mrur m aca vv 2xur enwae r Barr Z889W8rr5 fDYN[ 3ArlYlN3! Y ~7/ ;INYdifGG 1N3RlSiAl1l 5A31 } a ' I 9 ~ ~ • ~~ ~ ~~ i ~~_ ~ W~ k~~ ~ \Btl 0 ti ~~ R` ~e _____4___- ___ __ .__ __ •rt ~,E,F,G« w~/~ WO-Ot (A~ 39[(/ TJ bnu, w m vs Ynn+r wrwia w m~ ~n ;~vra~%~ +nvniuput~sxn 111°1 °°,ra,~.,°®° -- n~rid ~iuans vrr~ 3nururn 3Lb' ®7/N130 ae3uxaV•etw-rY mb .Y m~ /O'Ylm ml~LO @I-Rf M~ 1\ O i • i l!i!iii°~° ®~ °'j l~~ ~I ~!je ~~!°! ih ~I°~~ ~~~ ~le~y~~0!; ~ ° I !! e~lll~l0ltlll lel --'--~ --i r~s -- -'- ~~~°~~ ~~~~~i ~~~~~ ~ ' ~~~ga~~$~ °~ ~ ~i a~ ~ A 1 1~ ' ~ 1 a e .~ i - •- - - :-il-- --- -- +r-- - 0 I EXHIBIT F a< _~ _ e Amy / ~9 _ -_ - °__ - -- fl / 1 °* q. °* {i °~ ~ ea + k/ + ~ t a 8 4 ri • • 1 } !{r t ~# ~1, ! , ~, 1 1 # y l~,~ # ~ rr , r°',# ,t ~irr # 9,##~ ria,,~is,; i ~ i 1 it! ; k - l# ~ 3 ~d f l r , iru~c„ .#, l~l ls#r„##~„ ,r ~ r ;! a,Sr , , ~~ h r ! di r ~ 3 i i ~ )i!l~~IHs s #~ ;l1 ,iii~lillil' i ~ ~ ~ ~+{ SA l 1 r / ~1 ~ ~ , r ~ ~®OIIJIJ r~ „ . , 1 r ; r , Y/ ~ Y~f3 ~ ? # . 6~! ~ ail ~ ,11 "s#if # #~ ~#~ , # III ® ®® - i - sf ~, _ il, _. ~ e6 ^~ _ d I L ~ ,,.,M ' Ig ~ r - -__ _ -_- - ~ ~ t! as .' ~a. _ l~r r; ~, s . ~=r , ~# fir ~ ' ~ I j ~ ~. ° L ;~ >~; ~ ~. ~> ~~~- N A , I # a { { { { E ~57,r E! ;~'} y E , I . I ~'i~~ l j as E 0 ®!!® 44® C~ I I ~ ~ _ d i ~ ~,I ~ R.i i~ ~ ; i - ~ ~~ ----I . ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ---- - - -I- -- - ----- I- j , i pr.l # I I rlY Y1 IY ~ $ ~ 3 D ®00® L w Y I Y ~ e, i ~ i iry ' I l I O U ~ # ~ ' dril , '''~ ' s r , .-r j ~. ! O I'' y .. o, ,mll~~ I u 00 0 0® _ -'_ - -' ___t~ j1 '~~ q i ' - - S 'll~ [~ ~y ~ g3 r ~ a ~ I _ n I 1 i ~ I I ~J ~ :1 E: a# ~ ' -_~_-_- -_-_ 1 ~ ~ #~ra B€ r rl ~ 1 ~ ~ Y _ I I I II ' •1 I ~ ~ t t ~ i I;~rji 1 ~ ~ a ~ € 6 d~ ~ ~ ~~el~tl --- - --- - i _ a 00 000 ~ - ~ ~ ~ !i ,~ ~, ~ s 'I j , j o r - s ~}' I, ~I ~ ~- i ---------- -- ~ - ~~#~_~ S.~ ~~ ~~ i°a ~~i~~1 t. ~i ~i ;.., , ;] ~ ^1I 11 ~ tl~~. .i.... '~~ a p ~~o Q ~ .] ~°~S o~~ .~ a E # p,E, ~,~ t3 W -- a°I~Y .. i.°:F ~ A~IJ4 ~Y:i °y s~; e ~:c:E9 x.ufe ~~ ~~, ~[ .j,I~ :.Iii ~~ ~~~ ~~ z z~r o~ ~ • z~~~ 0 :~ ~®~ ~ 1 p,E,F,C~ I~ ~, _~ ~ . ,.~ ~, ~~~ ~~a q. 9 ~~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~~~ r~Or ~~ ~., ~ ~ ~®® ~; ~ _~.~ ~ w __ __ 1 '-/\ ~. n - ~ /'M + ~ I ~~ \~D i I 1~ 91 a i~ ~~;~ ~C~15 D,E, , x~qg ~: e ~i ~f' ~~4)t p i.5i Fi~~ 5~3~ 3 ~<Is u Y _~ 0 ~tl e 8 0 D 7 ~ ` ^ W ~_ z z O in w h O ~ ~ E ~ ~~ o :~p ~ ~ r < O Z Z O 5 5 £ ~ 7 . i ~ a O u • O A~ J o 0 ¢ _ 3 u ~ z y ~ rc 0 s- ~ a f ! • EXHIBIT G C~ • ~ 09 ~ ~ yJ / C/f I < 1 5 z~~•- li i ~ SSee iL`1 _ ~~p _ I :.,, W ~,' ~„"s ~' .~ ei ~7 7i ~ J a :i~II ~e,K 5a III idg ~ y~ `~~. .\ u <'` N W rIi ~ _ ~ ff33 ~4 III Id'C ~ :' ~._ - a d ~~ ~ m oR~ g ~~~~ a °r~,,. iJ78 z p 3„xx D ~:4~ ~uy~si aGp 3<xx ~_ ~'' ~: LL a ~ ~ N~~~~3~ ~ ~ w CC Z 7M8 Q < 5 ~0~~3 ~/ 0 8 a W a x LL Z ~ ~ u ~ p z J 'i O ~ f _ ~ O u a U ~ _ ~ 0 3 v I ?~- y m- e Z p&~ J S a~ ~ I _' _ ~~ _ , x Q. ~i ~o S~ ----J o W N o~ _; i I I n • augq z q a~ .~~q~ ~ ~.g' s q =i' <b ~< 0 f O x z O r f a J J 3 ~~ ~, o ,O/ u W ~ .L'` u O z O 0 u x U u z z 0 p~E,F,G l8 y • ~... `J 'gymZ 0. N z 0 i ~i yz~a S~'A <.. ~'f~ ~~pp~ 531 'ea a 3<It `~1^I ~1/ < d ~ ~ N cW O ~ G U = i u Z O Z o o ~ ~ O u < U J 0 3 x V Z rc ~° [~ • sJ A s=3. ~-,~ ~r:' o ~.s~ ~~~~ ~~~a ~'<Ae tl ~ di ~ Q N W ZC y i ~ < V ~ N = ~° n~ U Z y O z O ~ ~ J < U < W O U J O 2 V Z c ~,E,r,G ao i ~p i L_~ 6 3 -°~.~~ Y, x ~ g z w O ~i iu{9 ~z®~ i °~ ~;~~ G Y..5 ~ ~~~9 ~<u ~< O~ ,,/-~ o W ~ ~~ O z 0 ~~ J U U x V 2 K f 0 x z O J 3 ~i ~ ~ =o~a o: e ~-~; A~ ~:g ~~ .boa d f.§ 3~~a G A Sf [ ~~ ~/ ~ ~~ ~ V ^ ..1 h ri V o O z W ~ o w O u Au x V O Z s a t y W 0 2 Z O r f <_ J J 3 ~- p~ E ~ F, ~ as (11 T1 s • AMADOR on Route 66 p~~- InnnMnnmiEUmmil RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA wiwwrw l~nwnuu~eH w ocan ~c~• pan WILLIAM LYON HOMES "~-'°''°-`^'° 1 POOL BUILDLVG EXhRIOA ELEK1T10NS root aoe aavaiox AILM l/ c~ su ~R Exnxr C ~n01ELI ENM11 ENTRY TOWER EXfERIOA ELEWQIONS AMADOR on Route 66 s_ ~~~.1.__ Imm~ulpnunltnnuml RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA vn~wrw HEVwAwAEU~ AYC MITE CIE IHC WILLIAM LYON HOMES • 1~ D C~ T 9.~ u LJ AMADOR on Route 66 ~~~- unnmummminnnml RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA VALLIIIM I~.L.IALNALCH AYC NIfICi• ING WILLIAMLYONHOMES ~ ~~'° ~=~~M I v ENVIRONMENTAL - ~ INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) Gty o7 Rancho Cucamonga (Please type or pant clearly using ink Use fhe tab key fo move /rom one hne fo the next hne ) Planning Drmmon (909)A77-2750 The purpose of this form is to Inform the Clty of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. App6cahon Number for the pro/ect to which this torm pertains TTM 1 Pro/ect Title Foothill and Name & Address of pro)ect owner(s) RC Foothill 998. LLC. A California Limited Liability Company 2155E Garvey Avenue North, Suite B-18, West Covina, CA 91791 Name & Address of developer or pro/ect sponsor Lewis Investment Company t 156 N Mountain Avenue I lnlanrl. CA 91786 Contact Person 8 Address Stacv Lin (Same address as above) Name 6 Address or person preparing this loan (~f different trom above) Telephone Number (909) 946-7536 EX H I B IT H Page 1 of 9 Created on 1/7!2005 3 27 PM piE~~,c~a~ INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONSWlLL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that d Is the responsrourty or the appucam ro ensure umt the appkcahon is complete at the hme or submittal, Crty slat/ will not be available to peilorm work required to provide missing m/ormahon .Information indicated by an asterisk (') rs not required of non-construchon CUP's unless otherwise requested by staf/ '1) Provide a /u/l scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy o/the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the pro/ect site, and indicate the site boundaries - 2) Provide aset o/color photographs that show representative views into the site /rom the north, south, east and west, views info and Irom the sde from the primary access points that serve the sde, and representative views of significant /eatures /rom the sde Include a map showing location of each photograph 3) Pro/ect Location (describe) Approximately 550 feet east of Etiwanda Ave , on the north side of Foothill Boulevard 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attacn additional sheet if necessary) 1100-161-04 'S) Gross Sde Area (ar/sq tt ) 9 96 ac / 433,858 SF '6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area o/public streets & proposed dedications) . 9 37 ac / 408,157 SF 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the pro/ect site (attach additional sheet i/necessary) A General Plan Amendment and Development Dlstrlct Amendment are required, from existing Community Commeraal to Medium Density Residential 8) Include a description o/all permits which will be necessary /rom the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the pro/ect NPDES Permit Rough Gradlnq Permit Private Sewer and Water Permit Public Sewer and Water Permit, Precise Gradlnq and Drainage Permit Public Street Improvements Permit Building Permits 9) Describe the physical setting o/ the ste as rt exists be/ore the pro/ect mcludmg mformahon on topography, sod stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing structures on site (mcludmg age and condition) and the use o/the structures Attach photographs o/ sigmbcant features described In addrton, ate all sources of m/ormahon (i a ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, bwhc and archeological surveys, traf(~c studies) The subfect site has areas of dense brush and exposed rock and soil cover types, a portion of which has been disturbed and graded during previous dirt moving operations adjacent to the site There are no trees located on the site The site topography is relatively even with grades from flat to 3%, and with high points at the northerly east and west corners draining evenly to a low point at the southerly border near OS 01-18 Environmental Part I DOC Page 2 of 9 Created on irr/2005 3 27 PM - ~,E,F,c~a~ the southwester) corner of the ro eci A few trails traverse the site one near the westerly project boundary one along the full south frontage of the site (parallel to Foothill) and a third trail along the easterly protect boundary The trails appear to have been created to facilitate the movement of dirt related to recent adjacent development (apartments to the north and a regional detention basin to the east) No structures currently exist on the site No evidence of animal habitation was obvious although no formal survey has been conducted f 0) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site Crfe all sources or rn/ormatron (books, published reports and oral history) There are no known cultural and/or historical aspects related to the subject sde 11) Describe any Horse sources and their levels that now af/ect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses The most significant noice source currently at the project is generated by traffic on Foothill Blvd The site will need to be laid out and designed in order to reduce the impact traffic noise will have on the develo merit, includin setbacks, rade se aratton and walls 12) Describe the proposed proect m detail Thrs should provide an adequate descnphon of the site m terms oI ultimate use that will result from the proposed project Indicate i/there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the antrapated completwn o/each increment Attach additional sheet(s) it necessary The proposed project will consist of 99 condominum units in 33 3-plex buildings The site will be accessed b two ated entries at either end of the ro ect on Foothill Blvd Driveways and sidewalks will convey vehicular and pedestrian traffic though the site Open space will be maintained in and around the buildin s and a common recreational center will also be provided C u The project is expected to be phased with 4 approximately equal divisions Completion of the phases is antra ated to be se uential and continuous from start to finish of all hased construcLon OS 01-18 Envvonmen[al Part I DOC Page 3 of 9 creareo on a ueuw o u ~,•~ - prEj F,C3 aF~ - 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including m/ormabon on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects Indicate the type o/land use (residenhal, commeraal, etc), intensely olland use (one-lamely, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale oI development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) Adtacent to the north is an existing apartment complex Vacant land and a convenience store are adtacent west and a interim regional detention basin is to the east Foothill Blvd borders the south side of the protect with an existing single-family residential protect and vacant land across to the south Vacant land is similar to the sublect site with a mix of brush barren land a few trees and a network of trails and drainage courses 14) WWII the proposed pro/ect change the pattern, scale or character oI the surrounding general area o/the pro/ect~ The residential use of the sde is similar to adtacent uses lower densely than the development to the north, and slightly higher density than existing development to the south • 15) Indicate the type o/short-term and long-term Horse to be generated, including source and amount How will these Horse levels affect adtacent properties and on-site uses What methods o/ soundproo/mg are proposed Short-term noise will be generated during construction from various machinery and tools Construction will be limited to standard working hours, and therefore the impact to adtacent properties should be limited _ Long-term noise will be generated by residential traffic which is consistanl with existing protects and will only slightly increase the volume on Foothill Impact should be minimal and typical for the type of use '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements o/mature orscenrc trees There are no existing trees on the site 17) Indicate any bodies o/water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drams The sublect site currently surface drains to Foothilll Boulevard • 05 01-18 Environmental Part I DOC Page 4 of 9 Created on tr//2005 3 27 PM ~,ctF.~aq 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For lurther clan6cahon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591 a Residential (gal/day) 39 600 00 Peak use (gal/Day) 79 200 00 b Commercial/Ind (gal/day/ac) Peak use (gal/mm/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal ^ Septic Tank ®Sewer It septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests 1I discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A /or usage estimates) For ludher clantication, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591 a Residential (gal/day) 19 800 00 b Commercial/Industrial (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number o/residential units 99 Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units) 99 for-sale condominum units • • 21) Anticipated range o/sale paces and/or rents le Price(s) S $300 000 00 to $350 000 a Rent (per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number o/bedrooms by unit type 1-2 Plan 3 - 3 bedroom lus den/o tlonal bed 4 23) Indicate anhapated household size by unit type All units are expected to house between 1 and 5 people averaging plus or minus 3 per unit OS 01-18 Environmental Part I DOC Page 5 of 9 Created on 7!7/2005 3 27 PM D,E,Fr~330 • 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the pro/ect Contact the appropriate School Distracts as shown in Attachment B a Elementary 18 b JuniorWgh 6 c Senior High 7 COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type o/use(s) and major funcbon(sJ o/commercial, industrial or instduhona/ uses 26) Total /loot area of commercial, mdustnal, or insbtuhona/ uses by type 27) Indicate hours of operation 28J Number oI employees Total Maximum Shift Time of Maximum Shitt 29) Provide breakdown of anhapatedlob c/assi(cahons, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an rndicahon of the rate of hire for each classi/nation (attach additional sheet if necessary) 30J Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City '31) For commercial and mdustnal uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be verrl~ed through the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract, at (818) 572-6283) OS 01-18 Envrtonmental Part I DOC Page 6 of 9 Creased on 1!7/2005 3 27 PM ptEt~r~ 31 - ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, /ve, and rlood control agencies serving the protect been contacted to determine them ability to prowde adequate service to the proposed protects It so, please indicate then response CVW D has been contacted regarding sewer and water service Both sewer and water will require limited off- site extensions however connection and service should not be a problem Fire will review the site plan and make any comments necessary to ensure adequate service The site Is within the Etiwanda master plan of storm drainage and two options are available connection to a drain m Foothill and connection to an existing detention basin ad scent east of the sub ect site 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals~ Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCt3's, radioactive substances, pesticides and herbicides, ruels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage o/ any o/the above Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates o/use, iI known There have been no known stora a or dischar a of hazardous and/or toxic materials on the site 34) Will the proposed pro/ect involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage or discharge ofhazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples Osted above 1/yes, prowde an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal The location o/such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans The protect will not involve the temporary or long-term use storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials I hereby certily that the statements furnished above and rn the attached exhibits present the data and inlormatron required for adequate evaluation o/this pro/ect to the best of my abrlrty, that the /acts, statements, and inlormatron presented are true and coned tot he best o/my knowledge and belie/ I further understand that additional inlormatron maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City o/Rancho Cucamonga Date 1/18/2005 Signature Title Assistant Protect Manager OS 01-18 Environmental Part I DOC Page 7 of 9 Created on 1!7/2005 3 27 PM p,E,r,C~ 3a ATTACHMENT A ater Usa e Average use per day Resldentlal Single Famlly 600 gal/day ApUCondo 400 gal/day Commerualllndustnal General and Regional Commerclal 3,000 gal/day/ac Nelghborhood Commerclal 1,500 gal/day/ac General Industrlal 2,500 gal/day/ac Industrlal Park 3,000 gal/day/ac Peak Usage For all uses Average use x 2 0 Sewer Flows Resldentlal Single Famlly 270 gal/day ApUCondos 200 gal/day Commeraal/Industrial General Commerclal 2,000 gal/day/ac Nelghborhood Commeraal 1,000 gal/day/ac General Industrlal 1,500 gal/day/ac Heavy Industrlal 3,000 gal/day/ac Source Cucamonga County Water Dlstrlct Master Plan, 6/00 i OS Ot-18 Environmental Part I DOC Page 8 of 9 Created on 1/7/2005 3 27 PM ptC,F,~33 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school dlstrlct for your area for amount and payment of school fees Elementary School Dlstncts Alta Loma 9350 Base Llne Road, Sulte F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-0766 Central 10601 Church Streel, Sulte 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-8942 Etlwanda 5959 East Avenue P O Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 Htgh School Chaffey Hlgh School 211 West 5th Street Ontano, CA 91762 (909) 988-8511 Page 9 of 9 Created on 1!7/2005 3 27 PM 05 Oi-78 Environmental Part I DOC P, E, F,C~3'~ AMADOR ON ROUTE 66 SUBTT 16882, DRC2004-00268 p,E, r-, ~ 3s BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II Protect File. General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00269, Development District Amendment DRC2004-00270, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16882, and Development Review DRC2004-00268 Related Files: None Description of Prolect: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00269 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request to change the land use designation from Community Commercial to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) on 9 68 acres on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue -APN 1100-161-04 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2004-00270 -LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request to change the zoning designation from Community Commercial to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) within the Foothill Boulevard Districts on 9 68 acres on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue -APN 1100-161-04 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16882 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request for a seven numbered and two lettered lot subdivision of 9 68 acres for 99 condominiums on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue APN 1100-161-04 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00268 -LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request to develop 99 condominums on 9 68 net acres within the Community Commercial land use designation of the Foothill Boulevard Districts on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue -APN 1100-161-04 4. General Plan Designation Community Commercial (Existing), Medium Density (Requested) 5 Zoning: Community Commercial within the Foothill Boulevard Districts (Existing), Medium Density (Requested) 6. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Developed Medium Density apartments to the north, vacant Office-Commercial to the east, single-family Low Density across Foothill Boulevard to the south, and underutilized commercial and residential uses zoned Community Commercial to the west 7. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 8 Contact Person and Phone Number. Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner (909)477-2750 9. Other agencies whose approval is regwred (e g , permits, financing approval, or participation agreement)• Cucamonga Valley Water District ,San Bernardino County Fue District, Rancho Cucamonga Fue Protection District ,and Regional Water Quality Control Board • D,G,~,C~3~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 2 GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used m this report CVW D -Cucamonga Valley W ater Distnct EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District SW PPP-Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Mode17G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less-Than-Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages OAesthetics O Agncultural Resources tx) Hir truauiy ()Biological Resources ()Cultural Resources ()Geology & Sods ()Hazards & Waste Materials (X) Hydrology & Water Quality (X) Land Use & Planning ()Mineral Resources (X) Noise (X) Population & Housing (X) Public Services ()Recreation (X) Transportationliraffic (X) Utilities & Service Systems OMandator Fndin s of Si nficance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (X) I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the protect have been made by, or agreed to, by the proiec r onent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared Prepared By Date O Reviewed By Date ~~' D , E, F, ~ g'l Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 3 Less man SiB^ificant Less Potennalry Wain Tnan Issues and Supporting Information Sources s~yry ant otwaoao'~ S,eruh ~m I Nan EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS t. AESTHETICS. Would the protect () () () (/) a) Have a substantial affect a scenic wsta~ b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not () () () (/) limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing casual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which () () (/) ( ) would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments a) There are no significant vistas within or adtacent to the protect site The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 b) The protect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard approximately 500 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue and is characterized by developed Medwm Residential density apartments to the north, vacant Office/Commercial to the east, single-family Low Density across Foothill Boulevard to the south, and underutilized commeraal and residential uses zoned Community Commercial to the west The casual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this protect Design review is regwred prior to approval City standards requre the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The protect would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vianity The design and placement of light fixtures wilt be shown on the Site Plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the protect site The impact is not considered significant 2 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the protect () () () (/) a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the s prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and ma p Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a O O O (/) Williamson Act contract pt~ F, ~ 3B • Initial Study for DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Issues and Supporting Information Sources c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, () () () (/) due to then location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Less Than Significant Less W,~h TTan Mniganon Significam No Comments• a) The site Is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard approximately 500 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue and is characterized by developed Medium Density apartments to the north, vacant Office/Commercial to the east, single-family Low Density across Foothill Boulevard to the south, and underutilized commercial and residential uses zoned Community Commercial to the west There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic wability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Counal The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) The site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard approximately 500 feet east of Etlwanda Avenue and Is characterized by developed Medium Density apartments to the north, vacant Office/Commercial to the east, single-family Low Density across Foothill Boulevard to the south, and underutilized commercial and residential uses zoned Community Commercial to the west The nearest agricultural use is more than 1 OS mile northwest from the project site Therefore, no adverse impacts are antiapated 3. AIR DUALITY Would the pro/ect a) Conflict with or obstruct Implementation of the appllcable alr quality plan () () () (/) b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially () (/) () ( ) to an existing or projected air quality vlolation~ c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any O O O (/) cntena pollutant for which the project region Is non- attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient av quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations p, E, F,~J 3°I initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 5 Less man SiBnihcant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potanhally SiBn~hcant WRh Mingahon Than SiGnilKant No I an Inco ratetl I act I act e) Create obtectionable odors affecting a substantial number () () () (~) of people Comments• a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, .heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing panicle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on aprotect-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained In good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures Imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) Ail construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions. • ~,E,~,Cj ~}O Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 6 • Less Than S gnil¢am less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially s,gNn~am ____ With M^~iga4on ......... ,en Than Signibcam i~ena~t No Irma Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil dunng and after the end of work penods Dispose of surplus excavated material m accordance with local ordinances and use sound engmeenng practices. Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt ~s carved over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Suspend grading operations dunng high words (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCA~MD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RW~CB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM~g) emissions, m accordance with SCA~MD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCA~MD and RW~CB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~g emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered egwpment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews wdl shut off equipment when not m use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction au quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon the Urban Emissions Model 7G URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (F wlould exceed SCAOMDNthresholdstlfor Organic Gases (ROG), and Particulate Matter (PM,g) significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council . In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be D,E~~=,G III Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 7 Less Tien Sipnihcanl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Poienoally siprvnoanl WM MitipeLOn TM1an S,pn~licant No I C Into alaE I C I t mitigated on a prolect basis to a level less-than-significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to Incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated r1 ~~ d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive • receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 The prolect site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor residences adjoining to the north Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less- than-significant levels e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated f) LSA Associates, Inc prepared an Air Quality Impact Analysis for the project (Air Study), which is available for review in the prolect file in the Planning Department The Air Study was completed in accordance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) CEQA Air Quality Handbook The Air Study concluded that the impacts associated with the prolect are less-than-significant C piE,~,G'~+a Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 8 i._.~ IL Less man Sigmhcam Less Petenually WRh Than j Issues and Supporting Information Sources s~gNh~ant M~hgahon s~gnm~ant r,e I I act Inco ratetl I acl 1 ap 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Would the protect () () () (/) a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or () () () (/) other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected () () () (/) wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting O O U (/) biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance i) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments a) The protect site is located in an area developed with residential, commercial, and utility uses The site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments as well as annual disang for weed abatement According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The protect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the protect will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on-site As a result, protect implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The matority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated piEiF,C ~3 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 9 Less Than Sigml¢ant Less Pclanually With Then Issues and Supporting Information Sources SpmM1Cant Mnigaucn SigmLCant No I ct Inco oratetl I act I act e) There are no heritage trees on the protect site, therefore, the proposed protect is not in conflict with any local ordinance f) The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project () () () (/) a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () (/) () ( ) of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological O (/) U ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred O O U (/) outside of formal cemeteries Comments a) The protect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 511) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. Propose mitigation measures and recommend Conditions of Approval to etimmate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEOA gwdelines. \n\ ~ t_J Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 10 Less Than 9gmM1Cant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potent,ally signNCant With Mmpaaon Than s~enmeam No 1 act Inco ratetl I act I act Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of- influence, including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The protect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) If any paleontological resource (i e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be - limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The protect site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments as well as annual discing for weed abatement No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area No evidence is in place to suggest the protect site has been used for human burials The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050 5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered Qn-site No adverse impacts are anticipated p,t,~-,~ ~t5 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 11 Less Than Sigmhcant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sigmbcant MiLga4on Significant No I aM Inco retetl I act Im act 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the protect a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, mtury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated () () () (~) on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 n) Strong seismic ground shakmg~ O O O (~) ui) Seismic-related ground failure, including () () () (~) liquefactlon~ iv) Landshdes~ O O O (~) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () (~) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or () () () (~) that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, I~quefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 16-1-B () () () (~) of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of () () () (~) septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater Comments a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Specal Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 51 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hill Fault, passes within 2 7 miles northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 4 03 miles north These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7 5 earthquakes is 15 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8 2 earthquakes, is 17 miles northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-signrficant ~~ The proposed protect will regwre the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils The Rancho Cucamonga area is subtect to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting D E~r,~`~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 12 L Less Than sicrn6cant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources spa^m=ent Miocaavn sv^~I~=aa. r+^ I C Into rated I act I act in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWl]CB) daily to reduce PM~v emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~v emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW~CB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions . c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The protect would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Soil types on-site consist of Tv6 Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 51-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The matority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types on-site consist of TvB Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 These soils are typically Loamy Sand No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The protect well connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed u 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS Would the pro/ect () () () (~) a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (~) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (~) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school p,6i~,G41 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 13 Less Than S,prul,cent Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially SgmLCant With Miagaaon Than SigmM1Cant No I act Into rated I act I act d) Be located on a site which Is Included on a list of () () () (~) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (~) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would O O O (~) the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area g) Impair ImplementaUOn of or physically intertere with an O O O (~) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (~) mtury or death involving wddland fires, rncluding where wildlands are adtacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ Comments: a) The protect well not Involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The Clty participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed protect does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are anticipated c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the protect site The protect site is located within 7 mile of the nearest existing or proposed school • • d) The proposed protect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of . hazardous materials No impact is anticipated p,E,F,f~4$ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 14 Less Than SpmM1Cant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pctanaally Significant wnh MiLgauon Than Sign~f¢ant No I atl Inro ratetl 1 ad 1 att e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The protect site is located approximately 4 1/2 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is ant~apated f) The nearest private austrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster Because the protect includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire Distnct Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed protect site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 t. J 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Would the pro/ect () () (~) ( ) a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or intertere () () () (~) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (~) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (`~) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surtace runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the () () () (`~) capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () () () (~) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (~) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps A,E,F,C~4q initial Study for DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Issues and Supporting Intormation Sources Clty of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Less Than Sigm6cam less Witty Tian MM1igaOOn Signdmant No h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that would impede or redirect flood flows () () () (~) i) Expose people or structures to a sigrnficant risk of loss, () () () (~) intury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp t) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (~) Comments• a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) The protect is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, regwring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction Permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment Prior to commencement of construction of a protect, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction poilutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation Pertorm inspections of all BMPs Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction protect discharges A construction protect for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit Construction protect proponents are regwred to prepare a SWPPP To comply with the NPDES, the construction contractor of the protect will be required to prepare a SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post- construction operational management of storm water runoff The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Madole and Associates dated January 14, 2005, that identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction Runoff from driveways, roads, and other impermeable surtaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system BMPs include both structural and non- structural control methods Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing Erosion and Sediment Control Plans, and various business plans that must be developed by any A,t, r, ~ ~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 16 Less Than Sgml¢am Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially signn¢anl With MNpation Then signnicanl Nn I act Inco retatl I att Im act businesses that store and use hazardous materials Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent i Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on- site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be pertormed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP) prepared by Madole and Associates, dated January 14, 2005, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping Plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits. b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga I~RC2004-00269. DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 17 Less Tnen S,gnd¢ant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Signd¢ant With Mitiga~on Than Sipnifmant No I act into rates I act I act development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surtace As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered significant d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm dram facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is for new development or significant redevelopment, therefore, is required to comply with the NPDES to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 7) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WOMP, including a protect description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 18 u Less Than Sgnilmant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially s~gn~u~ant Wrch MNgation Then 9gmLCant No I ect Inco ialetl I act I ad g) The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected h) The prolect site Is not located within a 1o0-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse Impacts are expected i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected I) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the prolect site, therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City u 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the prolect a) Physically divide an established community () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (`~) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the prolect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or O O U (/) natural community conservation plan Comments• a) The site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard approximately 500 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue and is characterized by Developed Medium Density apartments to the north, vacant Office-Commercial to the east, single-family Low Density across Foothill Boulevard to the south, and underutilized commercial and residential uses zoned Community Commercial to the west This prolect will be of similar design and size to neighboring apartment development to the north The prolect will become a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated b) The prolect site land use designation is currently Community Commercial with Medium Density Residential proposed The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan and does not intertere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticipated DIEi~~~53 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBT"fi6882, DRC2004-00268 Page 19 Less Tnan Signilmanf Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources awemially Sgnd¢enl wrtn Mitipalion rnan $IQnIflCdnl No I act Inca retaa I act I act c) The protect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development wtll not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the prolect () () () (/) a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments• C J a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable • mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact 11. NOISE. Would the protect result rn () (/) () ( ) a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels () () () (/) in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient O (/) O ( ) noise levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect e) For a prctect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would O O O (/) the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels p,E,F,GSy Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 20 ~J Lela Tnan 51BnlecaOf Less Issues and Su ortm InformaUOn Sources pp g Potenaelly SiOmLCant wrtn Mrtigaaon roan Sigmhcant No I acl Inco oratetl I act I act Comments a) The prolect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at bwld-out A Noise Impact Analysis was prepared by LSA Associates, Inc dated November 23, 2004 The Nose Study concludes the mitigation measures listed below would reduce exterior and interior noise levels to less-than-significant levels 1) A 12-foot sound wall along the southern boundary of the prolect along Foothill Boulevard is required. This sound wall can consist of berms and concrete masonry units. 2) A sound wall along the western boundary of the prolect with height gradually decreasing from 12 feet near Foothill Boulevard to 8 feet near the internal driveway is required. 3) An air conditioning system for all dwelling units with direct line-of-sight to Foothill Boulevard traffic Is required. 4) Building fagade enhancements or upgrades, such as double-paned windows with a minimum sound transmission class (STC) of STC-32, are required for all dwelling units in the southern most row of buildings along Foothill Boulevard. 5) A 5-foot sound wall along the southern balcony perimeter is required for all dwelling units in the southernmost row of buildings with balconies exposed to _ Foothill Boulevard traffic. The sound wall can be constructed with a combination of wood and plexiglass, with no gaps. b) The uses associated with this type of prolect normally do not induce ground borne vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the prolect d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction egwpment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 6) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8.00 p m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national hohday 7) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If p,E,~'r~55 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 21 Issues and Supporting Information Sources Less Than 9gmisant Less Witty Then MihBabon Signilicant No noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 8) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction egwpment, however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be regwred 9) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p m and 6:30 a.m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily taps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The protect site is aocated approximately 4 1/2 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the Citys westerly limits No impact is anticipated 12 POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the pro/ect () () () (/) a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (tor example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the () () () (/) construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments• a) The protect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce substantial population growth Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area No impacts are anticipated b) The protect site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c) The protect site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated DiE~F,GSb Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 22 ~_J less Than Signd¢am Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Finanaally Significant wpm Mnipatmn roan Significant No I act Inco oretea I act I act 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the protect result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance () () () (~) obtectives for any of the public services a) Fire protection b) Police protections () () () (~) c) Schools () () () ('~) d) Parks O O O (~) e) Other publicfacddies~ O O O (~) - Comments a) The site, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard approximately 500 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue, would be served by a fire station located approximately 1 4 mile from the protect site The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard Conditions of Approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the protect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the protect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the protect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled The Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the protect area Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development A Standard Condition of Approval will require the developer to pay the School Impact Fees With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located 22 mile from the protect site The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A Standard Condition of Approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga well increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the protected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the p~E~F,C~61 Initial Study for DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Issues and Supporting Information Sources City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 Less Than • Sipnd¢ani Less I Wah Than Miapa4on Sipndicant No cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City 14. RECREATION Would the protect () () () (/) a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreatOnal facddies or require O O O (/) the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the envuonment~ Comments• a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located 22 mile from the protect site This protect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A Standard Condition of Approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated b) See a)response above 15 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the protect () () () (/) a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e , result m a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacty ratio on roads, or congestion at mtersections)~ b) Exceed, either mdrvidually or cumulatively, a level of O O O (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change in av traffic patterns, including either O O O (/) an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature O O U (/) (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) e) Result in inadequate emergency access O O O (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity O O O ('~) r~ I•_J p,~,1=,C~5$ Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 24 • Less roan Sigml¢am Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially SigniM1Cam won Mmgatwn roan Signd¢anf No I act In[O rat¢tl I ett I aM g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs O O O (~) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments: a) Implementation of the proposed protect will generate an average of 580 vehicle taps daily The proposed protect includes the development of 99 condominium units The Traffic Study prepared by LSA Associates Inc , dated January 12, 2005, estimates that each unit will generate 5 86 average daily trips As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in protect design The protect will not create a substantial increase In the number of vehicle trips, trafiic volume, or congestion at intersections The protect site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development Fee that must be paid by the applicant poor to issuance of Building Permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No impacts are anticipated b) The protect will generate 94 two-way peak hour trips, which is less than 250 two-way peak hour trips for non-retail, therefore, is below the threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic impact analysis The Traffic Study prepared by LSA Associates Inc , dated January 12, 2005, estimates that each unit will generate, 44 two-way peak hour trips daily The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing The protect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adtacent arterials The protect will be required to provide street Improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated c) Located approximately 4 1/2 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the tlight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) The protect is in an area that is mostly developed The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The protect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The protect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are ariticipated f) The protect design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated g) The protect design includes, or the protect will be conditioned to provide, features supporting • transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) p,E,F, C~59 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 25 Less Tnan Sipndiwnt Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Sp^ifmant Witn MM1ipation Tnan Signd¢ant No I act Inco ratetl I act I act 16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the () () () (~) project a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (~) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water () () () (~) drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects ~ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (~) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (~) provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to () () () (~) accommodate the protect's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () ~ (~) regulations related to solid waste Comments• a) The proposed protect is served by the CVW D sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed protect is served by the CVW D sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within the City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water duality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits The impact is not considered significant d) The protect is served by the CVWD system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No impacts are anticipated D,Ei~, e r~o Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 26 Lass Than SiOn'hcanl Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources PP 9 Patenaally S,eNrcant wnn Mnipaam man 9enmcant No I ad Inco ratetl I ad 1 ct e) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within the City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE () () () (,~) a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) c) Does the protect have environmental effects that will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or mdirectly~ Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required tc develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build- out in the City and Sphere of Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan D,E,F,~j (al Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ~Ir.ccA PrniocT Nama> Page 27 Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is regwred c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review PP ~)he City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that a I (x) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) . (x) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH#88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (x) Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan EIR (SCH#87021615, certified September 16, 1987) (x) Etiwanda Specific Plan EIR (SCH #82061801, certified July 6, 1983) (x) Traffic Study prepared by LSA Associates Inc ,dated January 12, 2005 (x) Noise Impact Analysis by, LSA Associates, Inc ,dated November 23, 2004 (x) Air Quality Impact Analysis by, LSA Associates, Inc ,dated March 2005 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study t acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clear ignificant environmental effects would occur Date ~~~~"~f)S Signature Print Name and Title STAri'f l,J n~ DQ-B'ICGT MMdn~r~tZ • p,E,F,Gc~a City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaratron rs being circulated for publrc review rn accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00269, Development District Amendment DRC2004-00270, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16882, and Development Review DRC2004-00268 Public Review Period Closes: January 11, 2006 Project Name: Project Applicant: Lewis Investment Company Protect Location (also see attached map): Located within the Community Commercial Land Use Designation of Foothill Boulevard Districts on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 1100-161-04 Project Description: A request to change the land use and zoning designation from Community Commeraal to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) on 9 68 acres for a seven numbered and two lettered lot subdivision for 99 condominiums FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the protect may have a significant effect on the envvonment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The protect file and ail related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is mulled to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. January 11, 2006 • Date of Determination Adopted By • RESOLUTION NO 06-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00269, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 9 68 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1100-161-04 A Recitals 1 Lewis Investment Company filed an application for General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00269 as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application " 2 On January 11, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred . B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public hearing on January 11, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a The application applies to approximately 9 68 acres of land, basically a rectangle configuration, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard and is presently vacant Said property is currently designated as General Commeraal, and b The property to the north of the subject site is designated Medwm density Residential and is developed with apartment units The property to the west is designated General Commercial and is under developed with a few single-family residences and a small business The property to the east is designated Office and is vacant The property to the south is designated general Commeraal (currently vacant) and Low density Residential (developed with single-family residences), and c This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Polices of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, and • d This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element, and p,E,F.yLy PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-02 DRC2004-00269 - LEW IS INVESTMENT COMPANY January 11, 2006 Page 2 e This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted m the proposed distract in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use m the surrounding area, and b That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties, and That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan 4 Based upon the facts and information contained m the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows• • a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared m compliance with the . California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed as conditions of approval in the related subdivision and development review applications that were reviewed concurrently with this application c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained m the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect asset forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00269 subject to the following condition . PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-02 DRC2004-00269 - LEW IS INVESTMENT COMPANY January 11, 2006 Page 3 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of January 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS p ,E, ~, g ~~ LJ Subject Property Existing Zoning © L 0 LM M ® CC ® RRC CO ®OS 200 0 200 400 Feet EXISTING GENERAL PLAN m D --I SUBJECT PROPERTY PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN © LOW LOW MEDIUM 2~~ ~ 2~~ 4~~ Feet ® MEDIUM 0 GENERAL COMMERCIAL © OFFICE ® FLOOD CONTROL /UTILITY CORRIDOR f°'°I PARK ~ PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN • RESOLUTION NO 06-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2004-00270, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIALTO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) WITHIN THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS FOR 968 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, EAST OF ETIWANDA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN 1100-161-04 A Recitals 1 Lewis Investment Company filed an application for Development District Amendment DRC2004-00270, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subfect Development Distract Amendment is referred to as "the application " 2 On January 11, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and issued Resolution No 06-02 recommending to the City Council that the associated General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00269 be approved 3 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public hearing on January 11, 2006 including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to approximately 9 68 acres of land, basically a rectangle configuration, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue, and is presently vacant Said property is currently designated as Community Commercial, and b The property to the north of the subfect site is designated Medwm Residential and is developed with apartment units The property to the west is designated General Commercial and is under developed with a few single-family residences and a small business The property to the east is designated Office and is vacant The property to the south is designated general Commercial (currently vacant) and Low Density Residential (developed with single-family • residences), and p,E,t=,Gc~9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-03 DRC2004-00270 - LEW IS INVESTMENT COMPANY January 11, 2006 Page 2 c This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, and This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element, and e This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with the existing land use m the surrounding area, and b That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties, and That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative • Declaration, together with all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows , a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negatroe Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial ewdence contained m the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the • presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations D , E ~ t=. ~ `1 U PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-03 DRC2004-00270 - LEW IS INVESTMENT COMPANY January 11, 2006 • Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development District Amendment DRC2004-00270 subject to the following condition 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or m the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of January 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS p,E,r,~ `71 • DRAFT ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2004-00270, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) WITHIN THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS FOR 9 68 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD EAST OF ETIWANDA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN• 1100-161-04 A Recitals 1 On January 11, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng with respect to the above referenced Development District Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No 06-02, recommending that the City Councl of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said Amendment 2 On 2006, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Development District Amendment • 3 All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred B Ordinance The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows SECTION 1 This City Council hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct SECTION 2 Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council dunng the above-referenced public heanng on 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows• a The application applies to approximately 9 68 acres of land, basically a rectangle configuration, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue, and is presently vacant Said property is currently designated as Community Commercial, and b The property to the north of the subtect site is designated Medwm Residential and is developed with apartment units The property to the west is designated General Commeraal and is under developed with a few single-family residences and a small business The property to the east is designated Office and is vacant The property to the south is designated general Commeraal (currently vacant) and Low density Residential (developed with single-family residences), and r~ CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO DRC2004-00270 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY January 11, 2006 Page 2 c This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Pollees of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, and d This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element, and e The proposed Development District Amendment is within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and f This amendment wtll not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and will not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties SECTION 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the Development District Amendment is hereby amended to change the Development District Map, in words and figures, as shown in the attached Exhibit A SECTION 4• Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, this Counel finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the Californa Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all sigmficant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows• In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the Califorrna Code of Regulations • • \J p,E, F, C~ ~3 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO DRC2004-00270 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY • January 11, 2006 Page 2 SECTION 5• If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invai~d or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 6 The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontano, California, and arculated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California U i m D --I • Subject Property PROPOSED ZONING LM M CC RRC CO OS 200 0 200 400 Feet PROPOSED ZONING a,E,-=,c~~5 • RESOLUTION NO 06-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16882 FOR A SEVEN NUMBERED AND TWO LETTERED LOT SUBDIVISION FOR 99 CONDOMINIUMS ON 9 66 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1100-161-04 A Recitals 1 Lewis Investment Company filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16882, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 11th day of January 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3 All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred • B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 11, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to the property located on the north side of Foothdi Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue, with a street frontage of 815 feet and lot depth of 537 77 feet, and is presently unimproved, and b The property to the north of the subject site is designated Medwm Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is development with apartments, and c The property to the west is designated Community Commercial and is vacant, underutilized with some single-family residences and commercial uses, and d The property to the east is designated Office and is vacant with Utility Overhead • Power Lines and temporary Flood Water Retention Basin, and D,E,r, C~`lly PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-04 SUBTT16882 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY January 11, 2006 Page 2 e The property to the south is designated Low density (2-4 dwelling units per acre, • and General Commercial and is Single-Family Residential, Low density (2-4 dwelling units per acre), and vacant 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth m Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby fmds and concludes as follows. a That the tentative tract map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speafic plans, and c. The site is physically swtable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdrvision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable mlury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and e The tentative tract map is not likely to cause serious public health problems, and f The design of the tentative tract map wdl not conflict with any easement acgwred by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdroision • 4 Based upon the facts and information contained m the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission fmds that there is no substantial evidence thatthe prolect wdl have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared m compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed prolect, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission fmds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the prolect, there is no evidence that the proposed prolect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained m the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the . Planning Comm~ss~on during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the 7, E,t-,G 1~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-04 SUBTT16882 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY January 11, 2006 Page 3 • presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) All future purchasers shall be advised through written disclosure by the Developer in a manner approved by the City Planner and City Attorney of the Master Plan layout of adjacent Commercial and Office uses Engmeenng Department 1) Foothtll Boulevard shall be improved m accordance with City's "Mafor Divided Highway" standards as regwred and including a) Prowde curb and gutter, curvilinear sidewalk, 9500 Lumens HPSV street lights, street trees, curbside drain outlets, R26(s) "No Stopping" signs and asphalt pavement, as required b) Provide a bus bay at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard • and Cornwall Avenue c) Prowde a westbound deceleration right-turn lane on Foothill _ Boulevard at Cornwall Avenue d) Relocate the existing 66 kV power poles to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. e) Prowde master plan access to the "Not-A-Part" property to the east to Cornwall Avenue cul-de-sac and Foothill Boulevard f) Proposed gated entrances are to be in accordance with City's "Residential Project Gated Entrance Design Guide" standard g) Revise traffic signing and striping, as regwred 2) The Cornwall Avenue cul-de-sac shall be improved m accordance with "Local Street" standards as regwred and including a) Provide curb and gutter, sidewalk, 9500 Lumens HPSV street lights, street trees, R26(s) "No Stopping" signs and asphalt pavement, as required b) Provide access along the east of Cornwall Avenue to • "Not-A-Part" property to the east 3) The Foothill Boulevard frontage shall be designed m accordance with PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-04 SUBTT16882 - LEW IS INVESTMENT COMPANY January 11, 2006 Page 4 the City adopted Foothill Boulevard Historic Route 66 Visual • Improvement Pian including street lights This designates a "Suburban Parkway Enhancement Area" at the southwest corner of the protect site, featuring colored pavement emblazoned with the Route 66 logo, special sidewalk treatment, artwork and a historic post, and a cable roadway safety barrier Said enhancement area shall be maintained by the developer and shall be included in the CC & Rs 4) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the opposite of Foothill Boulevard shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of building permits The fee shall be one-half the City adopted umt amount times the length of the protect frontage 5) Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Cornwall Avenue The developer shall receive credit against, and reimbursement costs in excess of, the Transportation Development Fee in conformance with City Policy If the developerfads to submitfor said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate 6) The existing Foothill Boulevard median island east of Etiwanda Avenue • shall be extended and landscaped to Cornwall Avenue per City Standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for median landscaping from future development as it occurs on parcels to the west and on the opposite side of the street If the developer fails to submit said reimbursement agreement within six months of the landscape improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate 7) Metropolitan Water District shall approve all plans that impact their easement including utilities, storm drain, slopes, street trees, and landscaping A note shall be included on all pertinent plans requinng Metropolitan Water District Operations Maintenance Branch to be notified two working days prior to startng any work m the vicinity of their easement 8) A permit shall be obtained from Metropolitan Water District for any work within their right-of-way, including grading a) Obtain written comments from Metropolitan Water District regarding the site design restrictions within their easement 9) Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map . approval or building permit issuance, whichever comes first PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-04 SUBTT16882 - LEW IS INVESTMENT COMPANY January 11, 2006 Page 5 • 10) Flow increases as a result of development shall be mitigated by enlarging Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Interim Master Plan No 6 adtacent to the east a) The developer who installed the basin is eligible for reimbursement to recover proportionate cost of the land and ultimate basin related facilities (outlet, etc.) Prior to recordation of the map, provide for a fair share cost for use of the land b) The mtenm basin to the east is private property Obtain an easement for installation of private storm drain faalities being proposed by this development 11) The proposed private on-site storm drain system needs to work with both the interim basin and ultimate public storm drain systems In the interim, prvate storm drain outlet to the bottom of the basin, not the top of the spillway 12) Priorto grading permit issuance, Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be - shown on the Grading Plan 13) Maintenance of BMPs identified in the WQMP shall be addressed in • the protect CC&R's 14) Final Tract Map 16882 shall be approved and recorded, prior to approval of any building permits Environmental Mitigation Measures Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication 2) Pnor to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand orhigh-volume, low-pressure spray p, E,F,GBo PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-04 SUBTT16882 - LEW IS INVESTMENT COMPANY January 11, 2006 Page 6 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated sod during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactnre construction areas that remain inactroe for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~a emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use 10) All residential and commeraal structures shall be regwred to incorporate high-effiaency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters i • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-04 SUBTT16882 - LEW IS INVESTMENT COMPANY January 11, 2006 Page 7 • 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage Propose mitigation measures and recommend Conditions of Approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, • important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with original dlustratwns, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing actvities elsewhere until the monitor has • completed salvage If construction personnel make the p,E,F,~Ba PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-04 SUBTT16882 - LEW IS INVESTMENT COMPANY January 11, 2006 Page 8 discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert • construction and notify the monitor of the find Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sotls 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RW OCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, m accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 • hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Bwiding Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall tie prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed prolect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are ~mtiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this prolect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff p~E~r,~g3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-04 SUBTT16882 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY January 11, 2006 Page 9 • 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Madole and Associates, dated January 14, 2005, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 6) Landscaping Plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbiades Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits. 7) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a protect description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The • WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 8) Prior to issuance of Grading or Pawng Permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the W aste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Nose 1) A 12-foot sound wall along the southern boundary of the protect along Foothill Boulevard is required This sound wall can consist of berms and concrete masonry units 2) A sound wall along the western boundary of the protect with height gradually decreasing from 12 feet near Foothill Boulevard to 8 feet near the internal driveway is regwred 3) An air conditioning system for all dwelling units with direct line-of-sight to Foothill Boulevard traffic is regwred • 4) Budding fapade enhancements or upgrades, such as double-paned windows with a minimum sound transmission class (STC) of STC-32, D,E,r,~ 8~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-04 SUBTT16882 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY January 11, 2006 Page 10 are regwred for all dwelling units in the southern most row of buildings • along Foothill Boulevard 5) A 5-foot sound wall along the southern balcony perimeter is regwred for all dwelling units in the southernmost row of buildings with balconies exposed to Foothill Boulevard traffic The sound wall can be constructed with a combination of wood and plexiglass, with no gaps. 6) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 7) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as speafied in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times maybe regwred by the Building Offical Said consultant shall report their findings to the Bulding Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 8) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in • first phase 9) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6:30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavytrucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily taps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-04 SUBTT16882 - LEW IS INVESTMENT COMPANY January 11, 2006 Page 11 • I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of January 2006 by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • p,E,~,~86 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING ~ PROGRAM Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00269, Development District Amendment DRC2004-00270, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16882, and Development Review DRC2004-00268 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect This program has been prepared m compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action wdl be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance wdl be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to prowde focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring • progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City m performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports wtll be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Diwsion 10500 Ciwc Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, AND DRC2004-00268 LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY • Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined bythe prolect planneror responsible City department, to monitorspecific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the prolect planner 4 The prolect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the speafic phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the prolect planneror responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The prolect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring afterwritten notification has been issued The prolect planneror responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached • hereto is not occurring The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after prolect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time In those instances requiring long-term prolect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the prolect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits LJ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2004-00269. DRC2004-00270. SUBTT16882, and DRC2004-00268 Applicant: LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY Initial Study Prepared by: L. J. Henderson. AICP, Prinapal Planner Date: August 9, 2005 rn _~ S+~ a S ... ~ Air Qualtty - c~ .. ~ - ;, ` ;~' -?`, . ~' - " ~ - , z- ,.~. . _. _ ~ All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans A/C - 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the CP/BO C Review of plans C 2 developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff Ail paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering • ~of 8 • d rn O CJ .. . .. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material m BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction SCAOMD Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C Durng A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction swtable means The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and construction Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Rewew of plans A/C 4 alternative fuel-powered equpment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Rewew of plans A/C Z4 Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use 2of8 (1l .. ... .. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C 2/4 required to incorporate high-efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters All 'residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C 2/4 requred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stepping Cultural Resources If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or signficant moddicaUOn without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to require CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Rewew of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Rewew of report A/D 3/4 Conditions of Approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report A/D 3!4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original diustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving d ~ - • ~of 8 • (t1 'r1 ~Ll • -. . It any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal CP B Review of report A/D . 4 fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualdied paleontologist to monitor construction actroities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i a ,paleontological monitoring) that maybe appropnate Where mitigation monitoring is appropnate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological morntor, trained and CP B Review of report A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing actiwties elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho CP D Revew of report D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum ao ~ & i A:~w 3•' r (~ ~ p j~~ 7'ns. rf, '-"7 Y tiJ. rS"~w, ~F Yl"F.. ~`~'x+~1n.- +.ts.n.+~'S1~-,g'4 •~-n~, ,~i tn..~ik~a-bar7P, ,nA~,',5~, Ya%~~`"? ~'~~,.~'` ~ ~ni"rJh di+G l~?lH~3rf~1^r+. ~. "YG; S'd'~~"~ ah..` ~ e r, ~n :.w rN.{}; w. 7"^'i, d A4..-_• +.~:..,-rA ^nVi! ~C"•i. i ~. ~ !r}~'s~'ni~'!='.w•'vTi7•° n r r~'p~. C nl r~:, o' e+ v_Ti1•a` a. ~.r~w9 n'~ {r>"i ., ` EL 9`;. ~ ~Si ~' z The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and construction RW OCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule estabi~shed by the City to reduce PM,o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 4 of 8 m . . ~ .. . . . . ... . . .. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction from the site during such episodes Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality Pnor to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit BO B/C/D Revew of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) speatically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame Durng construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site . ~of 8 • _rn S 1 • • C~ ~. -. .. The developer shall implement the BMPs identdied in CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 the Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP) prepared by Madole and Associates, dated January 14, 2005, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical Landscaping Plans shall include provisions for BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2!4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits Pnor to issuance of Bulding Permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of plans AIC 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WOMP, including a protect description and identifying BMPs that wdl be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The ~ WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New - Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise ~ - ~ `' '; ^ - - "> ` ' i~ "' `' - - ~ _ ~3`= -`,.' - '' , ~ . ~ - ~ ci rz, - _ A 12-foot sound wall along the southern boundary of the CP/BO BC Review of Plans CA 2/4 protect along Foothill Boulevard is requved This sound wall can consist of berms and concrete masonry units 6 of 8 D m aL~ U .. . . . . . . . .. . A sound wall along the western boundary of the protect CP/BO BC Review of Plans CA 2/4 with height gradually decreasing from 12 feet near Foothill Boulevard to 8 feet near the internal driveway is required An air conddwnmg system for all dwelling units with CP/BO BC Revew of Plans CA 2/4 direct line-oi-sight to Foothill Boulevard traffic is requved Bulding fapade enhancements or upgrades, such as CP/BO BC Review of Plans CA 2/4 double-paned windows with a minimum sound transmission class (STC) of STC-32, are requred for all dwelling units in the southern most row of bwldings along Foothill Boulevard A 5•foot sound wall along along the southern balcony CP/BO BC Review of Plans CA 2/4 perimeter is required for all dwelling units in the southernmost row of bwldings with balconies exposed to Foothill Boulevard traffic The sound wall can be constructed with a combination of wood and plexiglass, with no gaps Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction ~ including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a i national holiday Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards specified ~n Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be regwred by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, ii noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Budding Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or hailed • ~of 8 • ~ .. -. . .. The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A 4/7 as possible in the first phase construction Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the POGO C During A 4!7 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings Key to Checklist Abbreviations , m T) t~ e~ --ResporislblePerson,• ~ ,` -- _,~.{_1;;;, u'- ~`° _- f'•- :Monitoring' Frequency ~~)`s~c, ~ ~,-, ~~.~,'"~'~`'"- • `Method ot~VerHic@tlon;~,~.;-~;,, , "":,~ ~ - , ,Sanctions CDD -Community Development Dvector or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B -Prior To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certdicate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 - CdaUOn 8of8 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16882 SUBJECT: AMADOR ROUTE 66 PROJECT APPLICANT: LEWISINVESTMENTSCO LOCATION: NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Completion Date A. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the attemative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's tees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of Tentative Tract No 16882 is granted subfect to the approval of General Plan _/_/_ Amendment DRC2004-00269, Development District Amendment DRC2004-00270, and Development Review DRC2004-00268 3 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 06-04, Standard _/_/_ and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The Conditions , sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits 1 This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning _/_/_ Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval r 1 ~J p~Ett=,c~Q~ Protect No SUBTT16882 Completion Date C. Site Development • t The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the Foothill Boulevard Route 66 Improvement Plan 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bwlding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 4 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 5 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subfect to the approval of the Planning and Engtneering Departments and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the Cary Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said informatcon changes 6 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape • maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of bwlding permits D. Building Design 1 For all residential development, provide conduct f rpm each unit/lot and a pull box to connect to the street Provide interior structured wiring for each house/bwlding with minimum Category 5 copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central dcstribution panel, prcor to release of occupancy (fiber-to-the building, FTTB) Plans shall be submitted for Ctty Planner and Bwldcng Official review and approval prior to cssuance of bwlding permits E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibct parking on interior circulation aisles other than m designated wsitor parkmg areas F. Landscaping 1 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the regwred landscape plans and shall be subfect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Department 2 Special landscape features such as moundcng, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intenscfied landscaping, is regwred along Foothill Boulevard -/-/ -/-/- ~~_ / / -/-/- / / -/-/- -/-/- / / -/-/- p,E,F,~j q& Pro,ect No SUBTT16882 Completion Date 3 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the -/-/- perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 4 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the -/-/~ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department G. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are requred for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of -/_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $495 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds maybe used bythe Cityto retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit H. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location -/-/_ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) • I. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following -J-/- a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, i Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, texture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Protect Number (i e , SUBTT16882) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report -/-/- Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to -/-/- the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are requued for fencing and/or walls -/-/~ D, E,F,~`~q Project No SUBTT16882 ComoleLOn Date J. Site Development • 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be -/-/- marked with the prolect file number (i e , SUBTT16882) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Buiding and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of bwlding permits for a new residential prolect or major addition, the applicant -/-/- shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Plan Check Fees , Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance 3 The Building and Safety Official shall provide street addressed after tracUparcel recordation and -/-/- prior to issuance of bwiding permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday -/-/- through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public -/-/- counter) 6 Submit pool plans to the County of San Bemardino's Environmental Health Services Department -/-/- for approval K. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Budding Code (CBC) for property line clearances -/-/- . considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations -/-/- 3 Rooting material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wrnd" instructions -/-/- 4 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC -/-/- Section 1505 5 Provide draft stops in attics in line with common walls -/-/- 6 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A -/-/- 7 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected ~n accordance with CBC Table 5-A -/~- 8 If the area of habitable space above the first floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the -/-/- construction type shall be V-1 Hour minimum 9 Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same bwlding shall be not less than 1-hour -/~- fire-resistive construction L. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading ~-/- Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A sods report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to -/-/- • perform such work 4 p, E, F, c, ~o~ Project No SUBTTt6882 ComoleLOn Date 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the -/-/- time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Bulding and Safety Official prior to the issuance of bulding -/-/~ permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for -/-/- existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer M. Additional Requirements/Comments 1 The protect shall fully comply with accessibility regwrements of 2001 California Building Code -/_I- Chapter 11 A (Housing Accessibility) APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from -/-/- street centerline) 60 total feet on Foothill Boulevard -/-/- 2 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards -/-/- 3 Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by -/-/ deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building ~ permits, where no map is involved 4 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring toint ' ~-/_ s or maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 5 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the _1-/- final map 6 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be -/~- dedicated to the City 7 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to prowde a minimum of 7 -/-/- feet measured from the face of curbs O. Street Improvements 1 Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from asource -/-/- of energy, fuel or power to any bwldmg service egwpment which is regulated bytechnical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and all improvements requred by these conditions of development approval have been ordinances , completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those bwldings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as regwred by case shall more than 95 percent of the bwldings or t I n no conditions of approval of developmen units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements regwred by t these conditions of approval of developmen • DrE,~,~ ioi Protect No SUBTT16882 Comolebon Date • Construct the following perimeter street Improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvmt Side• walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trell Medtan Island Btke Tratl Other Foothill Boulevard X X (c) X X X (d) (b) Cornwall Avenue X X X X X X Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an In-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item Improvement Plans and Construction • a Street Improvement plans, Including street trees, street lights, and Intersection safety Ilghts on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered CIVII Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, priorto final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs fast b Prior to any work being pertormed In public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified • e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per Clty Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards In accordance with the City's street tree program _~-~- -~-~- _/-/- ~-~_ -~-~- ~~_ ~-~- -~-~- _/~- -~-~- DtE fF,G ioa Protect No SUBTT16882 Comolenon Date Install street trees per Clty street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation In those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min Grow Spaee Spaeing Stze oty Foothill Boulevard Rhus lances Afncan Sumac 5 tt 20 ft o c 15-gal Fill In Informal groupings Non activity centers not more than 25 - pnmerily in R O W of total frontage trees Non ectrvity centers Platanus acerifolla London Plane Tree 8 tt a n e p p 15 gal Fill In 30 ft o c lans - on-site suggested Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Pnor to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicittes or nutrient deficiencies may require backflll soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only P D. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A separate set of landscape and Irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the Clty Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed Into the Landscape Maintenance District Foothill Boulevard 2 Public landscape areas are required to Incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble or other acceptable non-Irrigated surtaces 3 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the approprl otval ordi suancenof b 9 ding Districts shall be filed with the Clty Engineer prior to final map app permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 4 Ail required public landscaping and Irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City Drainage and Flood Control A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the Clty Engineer prior to final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be Installed as required by the City Engineer Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adtacent areas _/-~- • -~-~~ -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- • 7 D,E,~,G l03 Project No SUBTT16882 ComoleLOn Date R. Utilities CJ Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the regwrements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water distract within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any regwrements that may be received from them S. General Requirements and Approvals r 1 LJ 1 Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to bulding permit issuance if no map is involved 2 Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of-way Metropolitan Water District -Foothill Boulevard 3 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or pnorto building permit issuance if no map is involved 4 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are droerted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permd application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- / / D,~,F.~ !o `I ~,~,~ . Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District r Fire Construction Services __ STANDARD CONDITIONS June 9, 2005 Lewis Investment Co Tract 16882 SUBTT16882 & DRC2004-00268, 269, 270 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design gwdelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants (Also see RCFPD Standard #9-8) a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial protects is 300 feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150 feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100 feet • b The maximum distance between fire hydrants in multi-family residential protects is 400 feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 200 feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150 feet c The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential protects is 500 feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250 feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200 feet d For single-family residential protects m the designated Hazardous Fire Area, the maximum distance between fire hydrants is 400 feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 200 feet from an approved fue hydrant For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150 feet. e. Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are i At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways u At intersections ui On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv As required by the Fire Safety Diwsion to meet operational needs of the Fire District • v A minimum of forty feet (40') from any bwlding f If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150 feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional • private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fire flow shall be provided g Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of requued fire flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The required fve flow for this project will be determined when the size and type of buildings is known This requvement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 2 The regwred minimum fire flow for this project, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed will be determined when the size and type of buildings is known This flow will reflect a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 or 13R with central station monitoring This regwrement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 3 The regwred minimum fire flow for structures located in the designated hazardous fire area shall be not less than 1,750 gpm at 20-psi residual For structures in excess of 36,000 square feet use CFC Table A-III-A-1 4 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radws of the proposed project may be used to provide the regwred fire flow subject to Fire District revew and approval Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow • 5 Firewater plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are appraued. 6 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600 feet of the proposed project site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fue sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fve sprinkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fue sprinkler system plans FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards regwre an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in 1 Multifamily structures greater than 7,500 square feet. 2 Multi-family residential structures in excess of 4 units 3 All structures that do not meet Fire District access regwrements (see Fire Access). • 4 When required fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure 2 A,E,F,S ~o~ When the budding access does not meet the requirements of the 2001 California Bwlding Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard #9-7 When any applicable code or standard regwres the structure to be sprinklered • FSC-5 Fire Alarm System RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or standards) regwres an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Building Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code Prior to the installation of the fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a bulding permit must be obtained Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fue Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fue lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fue Department Access - Fire Lanes Standard #F191 10 200 1 Location of Access All portions of the structures 15' story exterior wall shall be located within 150 feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions • 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26 feet b The maximum inside turn radds shall be 24 feet c The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50 feet d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45 feet. e The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches f At any prroate entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the dnving surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) Trees and shrubs planted adfacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of ~ 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus • 3 ~~E~F,~ ~~`~ 3 Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Bwlding Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards • 4 Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all regwred bwlding exterior openings 5 Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1 The following design regwrements apply a Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are regwred to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS b Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward c Gates may be motorized or manual. d When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet e Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20.00 f Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second g The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and afad-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in • case of power failure or mecharncal malfunction h Motorized gates shall be egwpped with a Knox override key switch The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location i For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex If traffic pre-emption dewces (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations 6 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fue lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 7 Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly assoaated with the business operations and/or bwlding construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be regwred for any activity or operation not speaficaily described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce • conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. p,ar,F,c~ io8 Compressed Gases Cryogenics Flammable and Combustible Liquids Hazardous Materials Liquefied Petroleum Gases Public Assembly LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Bwldings Welding and Cutting Operations Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan Californaa Government Code, Section 65850.2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting speafic hazardous materials disclosure requirements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new faality 2 Any business that operates on rented or leased oroperty which is required to submit a Plan, is also requred to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is • subfect to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner. FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shalt be submitted and approved prior to construction of bwldmgs and/or the installation of egwpment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Bwlding, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal wdl review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee FCS-14 Map Recordation Reciprocal Access Agreement The plan as submitted indicate that the regwred Fire Department access a. Is located on property which is not under the control of the applicant, or • 5 A~~iF,~ l~°I Crosses a property line, or • c Is shared by multiple owners, or d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire District The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire District approval The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino To assist Fire Construction Services in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal The current title reports to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties included in the agreement The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subfect to the agreement A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn radn and slope of roadway surface shall be provided. The access roadway shall comply with the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 2 Reaprocal Water Covenant and Agreement The plans as submitted indicate that a regwred • private fire mains or appurtenances a Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property line, or c Provide service to adjacent properties, or d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association, or Is shared by multiple owners Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the private water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection egwpment essential to the water supply The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract. The agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or budding permits 6 Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the • issuance of any building permits: 1 Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distract Standards Approval of the on-site (pnvate) fire underground and water plans is regwred pnor to any bwlding permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Bwlding & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2 Public Water Supply (DomestidFire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radws of the protect All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements • of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the firnshed surface of the road Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fue flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fve Construction Services Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The bwlding construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On pnvate property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. ~~1:,~,~ II I 2 Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on- site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the requred fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler morntoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subfect to the release of power) 5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other speaal hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fue Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service 6 Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7 Access Control Gates Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services • 8 Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fve access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all regwred fire access roadways 9 Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. 10 Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commeraal/industrial and multi- family buldings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness. When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance. Larger address numbers will be regwred on bwldings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial and industrial buildings The swte designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all swtes 1 t Fuel Modification Please refer to RCFPD Summary of Fire Hazardous Area regwrements. • D,~,F,c,i~a 12 Hazardous Materials Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in venting from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino • County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services 13 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subiect bwlding or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 14 Mapping Site Plan Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'/z" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as regwred in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector • 9 D~c,F,~~13 • RESOLUTION NO 06-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00268, A REQUESTTODEVELOP 99 CONDOMINIUMS ON 9 68 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, EAST OF ETIWANDAAVENUE INTHE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1100-161-04 A Rentals 1 Lewis Investment Company filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2004-00268, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subfect Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 11th day of January 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date Ail legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced meeting on January 11, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application applies to the property located on north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue, with a street frontage of 815 feet and lot depth of 537 77 feet, and is presently unimproved, and b the property to the north of the subject site is designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units) and is developed with apartments, and c the property to the west is designated Community Commercial and is vacant, underutilized with some single-family residences and commercial uses, and d the property to the east is designated Office and is vacant with Utility Overhead Power Lines and temporary Flood Water Retention Basin, and • e the property to the south is designated Low density (2-4 dwelling units per acre), and General Commercial and is Single-Family Residential, Low density (2-4 dwelling units per acre), and vacant PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-05 DRC21004-00268 - LEWIS INVESTMENT CO January 11, 2006 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the • above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows The proposed prolect is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan, and b The proposed use is m accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and c The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, wdl not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence thatthe project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared incompliance with the • California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no sigmficant adverse environmental effects will occur. c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed prolect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-OS DRC21004-00268 - LEWIS INVESTMENT CO January 11, 2006 Page 3 • Planning Department 1) All future purchasers shall be advised through written disclosure by the developer in a manner approved by the City Planner and City Attorney of the Master Plan layout of adtacent Commercial and Office uses Eng ineering Department 1) Foothill Boulevard shall be improved in accordance with City's "Mator Divided Highway" standards as regwred and including a) Provide curb and gutter, curvilinear sidewalk, 9500 Lumens HPSV street lights, street trees, curbside dram outlets, R26(s) "No Stopping" signs and asphalt pavement, as regwred b) Provide a bus bay at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Cornwall Avenue c) Provide a westbound deceleration right-turn lane on Foothill Boulevard at Cornwall Avenue d) Relocate the existing 66 kV power poles to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. • e) Provide master plan access to the "Not-A-Part" property to the east to Cornwall Avenue cul-de-sac and Foothill Boulevard f) Proposed gated entrances are to be in accordance with City's "Residential Protect Gated Entrance Design Guide" standard g) Revise traffic signing and striping, as required 2) The Cornwall Avenue cul-de-sac shall be improved in accordance with "Local Street" standards as regwred and including: a) Provide curb and gutter, sidewalk, 9500 Lumens HPSV street lights, street trees, R26(s) "No Stopping" signs and asphalt pavement, as regwred b) Provide access along the east of Cornwall Avenue to "Not-A-Part" property to the east 3) The Foothill Boulevard frontage shall be designed m accordance with the City adopted Foothill Boulevard Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan including street lights. This designates a "Suburban Parkway Enhancement Area" at the southwest corner of the protect site, featuring colored pavement emblazoned with the Route 66 logo, special sidewalk treatment, artwork and a historic post, and a cable • roadway safety barrier Said enhancement area shall be maintained by the developer and shall be included in the CC & R's PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-OS DRC21004-00268 - LEW IS INVESTMENT CO January 11, 2006 Page 4 4) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the • existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the opposite of Foothill Boulevard shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of bwlding permits The fee shall be one-half the City adopted umt amount times the length of the protect frontage 5) Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Cornwall Avenue The developer shall receive credit against, and reimbursement costs in excess of, the Transportation Development Fee in conformance with City Policy If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate 6) The existing Foothill Boulevard median island east of Etiwanda Avenue shall be extended and landscaped to Cornwall Avenue per City Standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for median landscaping from future development as it occurs on parcels to the west and on the opposite side of the street If the developer fads to submit said reimbursement agreement within six months of the landscape improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate . 7) Metropolitan Water District shall approve all plans that impact their easement including utilities, storm drain, slopes, street trees, and landscaping A note shall be included on all pertinent plans regwnng Metropolitan Water District Operations Maintenance Branch to be notified two working days prior to starting any work in the wcinity of then easement 8) A permit shall be obtained from Metropolitan Water District for any work within their right-of-way, including grading a) Obtain written comments from Metropolitan Water District regarding the site design restrictions within their easement 9) Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or bwlding permit issuance, whichever comes first 10) Flow increases as a result of development shall be mitigated by enlarging Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Interim Master Plan No. 6 adtacent to the east a) The developer who installed the basin is eligible for reimbursement to recover proportionate cost of the land and ultimate basin related facilities (outlet, etc) Prior to recordation . of the map, provide for a fair share cost for use of the land 1~~c,F,C~ ll'1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-05 DRC21004-00268 - LEW IS INVESTMENT CO January 11, 2006 Page 5 • b) The interim basin to the east is pnvate property Obtain an easement for installation of pnvate storm drain facilities being proposed by this development 11) The proposed private on-site storm dram system needs to work with both the interim basin and ultimate public storm dram systems In the interim, private storm drain outlet to the bottom of the basin, not the top of the spillway 12) Pnorto grading permit issuance, Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be shown on the Grading Plan 13) Maintenance of BMPs identified in the WQMP shall be addressed in the protect CC&Rs. 14) Final Tract Map 16882 shall be approved and recorded, prior to approval of any building permits Environmental Mitigation Measures Avr Qualrfy 1) All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good operating • condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand orhigh-volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through • seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads D~E,~,C~~t8 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-OS DRC21004-00268 - LEW IS INVESTMENT CO January 11, 2006 Page 6 Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time • Schedule activities to mirnmize the amounts of exposed excavated soil dunng and after the end of work penods Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if sdt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCBJ) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, m accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be regwred to incorporate high-effiaency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 11) All residential and commercal structures shall be regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • • p ~, F, ~ 11°I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-05 DRC21004-00268 - LEWIS INVESTMENT CO January 11, 2006 Page 7 • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their speaal qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend Conditions of Approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on sigmficant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a • qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that maybe appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, framed and egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent • (approved by SCAOMD and RW QCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible p l~, F,~ Sao PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-OS DRC21004-00268 - LEW IS INVESTMENT CO January 11, 2006 Page 8 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule • established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site durng such episodes 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,a emissions Hydrology and Water 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Bwlding Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum - extent practical 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included m the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific • measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Pian shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Speafy the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy penods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 3) Dunng construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) Dunng construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed pnor to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust m order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Madole and Associates, dated January 14, 2005, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical ~,~,~,c~iai PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-05 DRC21004-00268 - LEWIS INVESTMENT CO January 11, 2006 Page 9 • 6) Landscaping Plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits 7) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a W OMP, including a prolect description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 8) Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Bwldmg Official for coverage under the NPDES General . Construction Permit Noise 1) A 12-foot sound wall along the southern boundary of the prolect along Foothill Boulevard is regwred This sound wall can consist of berms and concrete masonry urnts 2) A sound wall along the western boundary of the prolect with height gradually decreasing from 12 feet near Foothill Boulevard to 8 feet near the internal driveway is regwred. 3) An air conditioning system for ail dwelling units with direct line-of-sight to Foothill Boulevard traffic is regwred 4) Bwldmg fagade enhancements or upgrades, such as double-paned windows with a minimum sound transmission class (STC) of STC32, are regwred for all dwelling units m the southern most row of buildings along Foothill Boulevard 5) A 5-foot sound wall along the southern balcony perimeter is required for all dwelling units in the southernmost row of bwldings with balconies exposed to Foothill Boulevard traffic The sound wall can be constructed with a combination of wood and plexiglass, with no gaps PEE ~F~ ~ ~aa PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-OS DRC21004-00268 - LEWIS INVESTMENT CO January 11, 2006 Page 10 6) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of • 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 7) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards speafied in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitonng at other times maybe regwred by the Budding Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Bwlding Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 8) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in fvst phase 9) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sundayora national holiday Additionally, if heavytrucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent • feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plamm~g Commission held on the 11th day of January 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS . ABSENT COMMISSIONERS p,E,F,~ (a3 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00269, Development District Amendment DRC2004-00270, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16882, and Development Review DRC2004-00268 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported • 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible gwdelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address. City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division • 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 D,E~~~~j ia'~I' DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, AND DRC2004-00268 LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the prolect planner or responsible City department, to momtor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the prolect planner. 4 The prolect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is requued for the speafic phase of development. 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue regwnng no further monitoring wdl be signed off as completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated cvcumstances may arse regwnng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The prolect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form wdl be completed bythe prolect planner or responsible Citydepartment and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 constucltion contractors f compliance I h any aspects of thehMMP sonot occurnngtafferVwntten notification has been issued The prolect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8 responsib lily of the'C ~tof Rancho Cucamonga'Planning D v s on The Di Ps on shalhaelqu re the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to momtor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time 9 In those instances regwnng long-term prolect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the prolect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an indiwdual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitonng/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of bwlding permits. • i~,E, r. ~ ias MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2004-00269 DRC2004-00270. SUBTT76882, and DRC2004-00268 Applicant: LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY Initial Study Prepared by: L. J. Henderson. AICP. Princiaal Planner Date: August 9.2005 .. . - .. • - ~ . .. IfYt~ vl ~4 ./y jai[ ~y,~m n M~.a. ` (- J'~ F~ r7~lr:~l 1 i4%.~,"!vin xh Av Quality. • v"~` y..t ; ~,": ~ . ; i - yip' S PY Y ' !~ ~ k i _ :~ ' '~ ; , .. _ „ ~,t.,..... ;r~~.: ,; ty ~ .F,,.r .:~r~ -. ; c: aS :., k'ra ~ c . ~~-~:; ,y ~.: All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specdications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the CP/BO C Review of plans C 2 developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City ~ denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide I evidence that low-emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was I investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction ~ measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality • Management Distract (SCAOMD) as well as City ~ Planning staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAOMD Rute 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAOMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAOMD BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering C (T T A 1 of 8 .. .. .. ~. . . . . . . . .. . . • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended penods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans A/C 2l4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work penods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineenng practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C Dunng A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction ~ Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , BO C Dunng A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction ~ SCAQMD Rule 403 regwrements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods BO C Dunng A 4 ~ haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction ~ suitable means The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 ~ sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and construction 3 Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans A/C 4 altemativefuet-powered equpment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. (T T a 2of8 • • • d _m ~-1 Al .. • .. . • -. . .. . All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C 2/4 required to mcorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conddwnmg, appliances, and water heaters All residential and commercial structures shall be 80 C/D Review of plans C Z4 requred to mcorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Cultural Resources If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre CP/BO C Rewew of report A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites wdhm new developments, using then special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's CPBO C Review of report AID 3/4 archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 Conditions of Approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on signdicant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 3of8 d 'Tl A) .. . - ... ~. .. If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal CP B Review of report A/D 4 fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monttoring) that maybe appropriate Where mdigabon monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, framed and CP B Review of report A/D 4 egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing actvties • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing actroilies elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho CP D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected speamens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum ~11 "h'r~ x' q ~ v x c xy r~ *,r, -r~ M r The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and construction RWOCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-sde Timing may vary depending upon the time of i year of construction ~ • Hof a ~ d m i~P .. .. . -. .. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction from the site dunng such episodes Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions Hydrology and Water Dualih' -- ~ - '. ', ~ ~,.1 ~~,°`~`. ''s;_>~ : `~" gr:'-j <., _ ~, . , , Pnor to issuance of Grading Permds, the permd BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit to Bwlding Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specdically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Revew of plans AIC Z4 Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identities specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing actroities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. Dunng construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 cleaning will be pertormed pnor to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site 5 of 8 _~ Ch t~ The developer shall implement the BMPs idenhfied in CE the Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP) prepared by Madole and Associates, dated January 14, 2005, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum eMent practical Landscaping Plans shall include provisions for BO controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits Pnor to issuance of Bolding Permits, the applicant shall CE submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WOMP, including a protect description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Ranrhn Curamnnna in .lone 2004 BIC/D Review of plans AIC B/C/D Review of plans A/C B/C/D ~ Review of plans ~ A/C 2/a 2/4 2/4 Pnor to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage underthe NPDES General Construction Permit Y~', ~'t~. k': ..,'YH'y'h~:.~ ~y{ryy~~ _ ~Lj~, x`~'F~M1 ~M1~r~~~..~~...~~~..~c1~ L'y i.»m 5 ~.'Y .f3" -;a t. } Y 'C 3 "'• - r = ~ N ' ~ ~ ~~~ _a~ ~~~M<br.~:'1~~_..r~ . ~ C ~~3C~ n 'sbt ~~'~i~'i:~ ~ r' t s-~ve_~ [~'`i.n°~i~~ ^3~we1 L'y ~• 4 _ ;Ly^l.,yU _ s- ~a-.tt ° -' . ~ y ; Vr e ^E Y~~+1 . i e + . ..._ d8 1 .~ n w ~. - ....33 ._ww ~ s Y wl~ r~~ e -Y-irn i. S ~ ~ , 1.~.. 4 Tr U ~ :f _. . ~ , n A 12-foot sound wall along the southern boundary of the CP/BO BC Review of Plans CA 2l4 protect along Foothill Boulevard is regwred This sound wall can consist of berms and concrete masonry units • ~of 8 • _m T l~ `~ L~ .. . - -. .. A sound wall along the western boundary of the protect CPBO BC Review of Plans CA 2/4 with height gradually decreasing from 12 feet near Foothill Boulevard to 8 feet near the internal driveway is required An air conditioning system for ail dwelling units with CPlBO BC Review of Plans CA 2/4 direct line-of-sight to Foothill Boulevard traffic is required Bulding farrade enhancements or upgrades, such as CP/BO BC Review of Plans CA 2/4 double-paned windows with a minimum sound transmission class (STC) of STC-32, are requred for all dwelling units in the southern most row of buildings along Foothill Boulevard A 5-foot sound wall along along the southern balcony CPBO BC Review of Plans CA 2/4 perimeter is required for all dwelling units in the southernmost row of buildings with balconies exposed to Foothill Boulevard traffic The sound wall can be constructed with a combination of wood and plexiglass, with no gaps Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of B 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property Ime The developer shall hve a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level momtonng as specdied in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Bulding Official within 24 hours, however, ii noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Bulding Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 7of8 ~ .. .. . The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A 4f7 as possible in the first phase construction Haui truck deliveries shall not take place between the POGO C During A 4!7 hours of S 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily taps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensi4ve land uses or residential dwellings Key to Checklist Abbreviations ~Ry~ ~1 "Fio's'~o'~~"81~91~'Fd~Qo~~~~~(!([[~~(~ 4~ ~ P,,, r4~~ n6Gi~y~ ~ k ~4~11 ~ ,fir `III&tiitoriML.yy:F~ `'(ay~]'Uen/~y' - J lrv3 Y~M }v1,.wW -w 1 C yryryy `y'l.,~~'' ((~~ A~e+PiO. nx~i.~ ~ ,f33w.~~.,yy.//~~ ,„.vjy~~ r,•Fi4f'1,~1/'~i,~I;i~ - rLT'NYrwVtlOnJd~ Yr (S"F~," 1 CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B • Prior To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - Ciry Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construcbon C -Plan Check 3 • W dhhold Certdicate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 • Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation • ~of 8 • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~ DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00268 SUBJECT: AMADOR ROUTE 66 PROJECT APPLICANT: LEWIS INVESTMENTS COMPANY LOCATION: NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL, EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Completion Date B. • 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to _ relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of Development Review DRC2004-00268 is granted subfect to the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00269, Development District Amendment DRC2004-00270, Development Review DRC2004-00268, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16882 3 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 06-05, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect Time Limits 1 DevelopmenUDesign Revew approval shall expire if bwlding permits are not issued or approved _/_/_ use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed D E,F, ~ 1~ Pro,ect No DRC2004-00266 Completion Date C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/~ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the Foothill Boulevard Route 661mprovement Plan 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ ' of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submttted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The bwldings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/~_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street Improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bwlding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit Issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved _/_/_ by the Ctty Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits Such plan shall indicate style, Illumination, location, height, and method of,shielding so as not to adversely affect adtacent properties ~ 8 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with _/_/ all receptacles shielded from public view 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed to underground vaults 10 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination 11 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the _/_/_ Homeowners' Association are subtect to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of bulding permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the Cary Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and f th e name Department a list o every year and whenever said information changes 12 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ homeowners' assoctatlon, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape owner , maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits 13 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall _/~_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adtoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property ' s owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the protect perimeter • p,c IF, ~ X35 Protect No DRC2004-00268 Completion Date 14 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry I • 15 For multiple family development, laundry facilities shall be provided as required by the Development Code 16 For multiple family development, a minimum of 125 cubic feet of exterior lockable storage space shall be provided 17 For residential development, recreation area/facility shall be provided as required by the Development Code 18 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers maybe manufactured products D. Building Design 1 Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowner's Association shall be submitted for City Planner and Bwlding Official review and approval prior to issuance of bulding permits 2 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included to building plans 3 For all residential development, provide condwt from each uniUlot and a pull box to connect to the street Provide interior structured wiring for each house/bwlding with minimum Category 5 copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy (fiber-to-the building, FTTB) Plans shall be submitted for City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation atsles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/bwidings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards 5 All units shall be provided with garage door openers ii driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk 6 The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior cvculation atsles other than in designated visitor parking areas 7 Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fue Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way • / / /_/_ /_/_ /-/- /~_ / / / /. / / -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- / / -/-/- -/~- / / Protect No DRC2004-00266 Completion Date F. G. Trip Reduction 1 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily _/_/ residential protects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the requred ~ automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces regwred are 2 5 percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces regwred exceed 100 Where this results in a traction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number 2 Transit improvements such as bus shelters, bus pullouts, and bus pads shall be provided Bus ~~- shelters shall also include a bench, a trash receptacle, and an adtoining bike rack (minimum 3 capacity) on a concrete pad Bus shelter shall be located outside public right-of-way and shall be privately maintained Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 A minimum of 45 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within _/_/_ the protect 0 % - 48-inch box or larger 10% - 36-inch box or larger, 10% - 24-inch box or larger, 80% - 15-gallon, and 0% - 5 gallon 3 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking _/_/_ stalls 4 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adtacent to and along structures at a rate of one _/_/~ tree per 30 linear feet of building 5 All prroate slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/_/_ - slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion lanting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be l Slo e t p p con ro installed by the developer prior to occupancy 6 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater ~~_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 7 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for _!~_ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thrroing condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within diseased dead damaged An min d t , , , y g rim an 30 days from the date of damage 8 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in _/~_ the regwred landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be requred by the Engineering Department • ~~ trFi ~J 13'7 Protect No DRC2004-00268 Comolehon Date 9 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Foothill • Boulevard 10 Landscaping and irrigation systems requred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 11 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department 12 Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species 13 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code H. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall requre separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs 2 Dvectory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or town homes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to issuance of bulding permits Environmental 1 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Interstate 15 Freeway in a standard format as determined by the Ctty Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any • property 2 Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on-and off-site A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to final occupancy release The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA 3 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the bulding materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The bulding plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained m the final report 4 The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards Certification shall be submitted to the Bwlding & Safety Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes 5 Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $495 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit • / / -/-/- ~~- -/-/- / / / / / / / / -/-/- ~-/- / / _/~ ~,E,F,c~~3g Protect No DRC2004-00268 ComoleLOn Date J. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location -/-/~ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permts APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) K. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following -/~- a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and • g Planning Department Protect Number (i e , DRC2004-00268) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submtt two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a sods report -/~- Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and W orkers' Compensation coverage to -/-/- the City pnor to permd issuance 4 Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls -/-/- L. Site Development _ 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be -/-/- marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2004-00268) The applicant shall complywith the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential protect or mator addition, the applicant -/-/- shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance 3 The Budding and Safety Official shall provide street addresses after tracVparcel map recordation -/-/- and prior to issuance of building permits • flfc61,~J I'~~ Project No DRC2004-00268 Comolellon Date 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday -/-/- through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays • 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public -/-/- counter) 6 Submit pool plans to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department -/-/- for approval M. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Bwlding Code (CBC) for property line clearances ~_/- considenng use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations -/_/- 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions _/~- 4 Provde draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC _/J- Section 1505 5 Provide draft stops in attics in line with common walls -/-/- 6 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/~- 7 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A -/-/- 8 If the area of habitable space above the first floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the -/-/- construction type shall be V-1 Hour minimum 9 Walls and floors separating dwelling units rn the same bwlding shall be not less than 1-hour ~_/- fire-resistive construction N. Grading • 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading -/-/- Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to -/-/- perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the -/-/- time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, -/-/- submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of bwlding permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction projects and for -/-/- existing bwldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer O. Additional Requirements/Comments 1 The protect shall fully comply with accessibility requirements of 2001 California Bwlding Code -/~- Chapter 11A (Housing Accessibility) r1 U Protect No DRC2004-00268 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: P Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 60 total feet on Foothill Boulevard 2 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 3 Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved 4 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 5 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map 6 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City 7 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs C Street Improvements Pursuant to City Council Resolution No SS-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the Clty Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development Construct the following perimeter street Improvements Including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Troll Median Island Blke Trail Other Foothill Boulevard X X (c) X X X (a) (b) Cornwall Avenue X X X X X X Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item Improvement Plans and Construction Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to ~~- ~-~- _/~_ ~-~- ~-~- _/~- / / / / _/_/~ ~~- -~-~- • 8 Protect No DRC2004-00268 Completion Date final map approval or the issuance of bwiding permits, whichever occurs first . b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a _/_/_ construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and ~_/_ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction _/_/_ protect along mafor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wrong Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City ~_/_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads regwring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with ~_/_ adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required Acash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be _/_/_ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots . h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check- _/~_ 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in ~_/_ accordance with the Citys street tree program • t/ I E r ~1 ~ ~ `a Protect No DRC2004-00268 Comolenon Date Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street Improvement plans Street Improvement plans shall Include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be Installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typlcally sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation In those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min Grow Space Spacing Size aty Foothill Boulevard Rhus lancea African Sumac 5 ft 20 tt o c 15-gal Fill In Non activity centers Informal primarily m R O W Groupings Not more than 25 % of total frontage trees Non activity centers Platanus acenfolia London Plane Tree 8 ft Sppce per on-site 15-gal on-sne plans - 30 h o c suggested Construction Notes for Street I rees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the Clty Inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfdl soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only R. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A separate set of landscape and Irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, traits or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District Foothill Boulevard 2 Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble or other acceptable non-irrigated surtaces 3 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 4 All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the Clty S. Drainage and Flood Control A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be Installed as required by the City Engineer Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adtacent areas / / • -/-/ -~-~- ~~- / / ~-/- -~-~- r U I ~ to~ ~'~3 p t Project No DRC2004-00268 Comolehon Date T. Utilities • 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/-/- 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/-/_ Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved ~_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any requirements that may be received from them U. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage -/-/- Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to bwlding permit issuance if no map is involved 2 Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of-way _/~_ Metropolitan Water District - Foothill Boulevard 3 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_/- new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or priorto bwiding • permit issuance if no map is involved 4 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related admtnistratrve fees shall _/_/- be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fulty refundable rf at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the Ctty Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Bwlding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: V. Security Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power ~_/_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buldings, with _/_/_ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development 3 Lighting in exterior areas shall be to vandal-resistant fixtures -/~- W. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors -/-/- • 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used ~_/_ 11 D E, ~, ~ 1`14 Protect No DRC2004-00268 Comoletion Date 3 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices _/_/_ X. Security Fencing 1 All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will prowde the police _/_/_ with a keypad access and a unique code The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at (909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Preventicn Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475 Y. Windows 1 All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted _/_/_ from frame or track in any manner Z. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime ~~_ visibility 2 At the entrances of commercial or residential complexes, an illuminated map or directory of ~_/_ protect shall be erected with vandal-resistant cover North shall be at the top and so indicated Sign shall be to compliance with Sign Ordinance, including an application for a Sign Permit and approval by the Planning Department 3 All developments shall submit an 8 Yz" x 11"sheet with the numbering pattern of all multi-tenant ~_/_ developments to the Police Department APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING • CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • 12 DtEt F,~ 1~t5 "~,,,,,~ , Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District .. Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS June 9, 2005 Lewis Investment Co. Tract 16882 SUBTT16882 & DRC2004-00268, 269, 270 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants. The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants (Also see RCFPD Standard #9-8) _ a The maximum distance between fire hydrants incommercial/industrial protects is 300 feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150 feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100 feet b The maximum distance between fire hydrants in multi-family residential protects is 400 feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 200 feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150 feet. c The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential protects is 500 feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250 feet from an approved fue hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200 feet d For single-family residential protects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area, the maximum distance between fve hydrants is 400 feet No portion of the exterior wall facng the addressed street shall be more than 200 feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150 feet e Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are i At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways u At intersections ui On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District v A minimum of forty feet (40') from any bwlding 1 If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150 feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional pnvate or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fire flow shall be provided Provide one fue hydrant for each 1000 gpm of regwred fire flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow The regwred fire flow for this protect will be determined when the size and type of bwldmgs is known. This regwrement is made in accordance with Fue Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 2 The regwred minimum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed will be determined when the size and type of buildings is known This flow wdl reflect a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 or 13R with central station monitoring This regwrement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fue Distract Ordinances 3 The regwred minimum fve flow for structures located in the designated hazardous fire area shall be not less than 1,750 gpm at 20-psi residual For structures in excess of 36,000 square feet use CFC Table A-III-A-1 4 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radws of the proposed protect may be used to provide the required fire flow subtect to Fire Distract review and approval Pnvate fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide regwred fire flow 5 Firewater plans are required for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 6 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600 feet of the proposed protect site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 Pnor to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, speafications and calculations for the fire spnnkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained pnor to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards regwre an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in 1 Multifamily structures greater than 7,500 square feet 2 Multi-family residential structures m excess of 4 units. 3 All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (see Fire Access) 4 When regwred fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure . 2 - p , E , ~, ~ l'~ "7 When the bulding access does not meet the regwrements of the 2001 Califorrna Building Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard #9-7 . 6 When any applicable code or standard regwres the structure to be sprinklered FSC-5 Fire Alarm System RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or standards) regwres an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Bwlding Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code 2 Prior to the installation of the fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a building permit must be obtained Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access - Fire Lanes Standard #F191 10 200 1 Location of Access All portions of the structures 15` story exterior wall shall be located within 150 feet of Fire Distract vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the bwlding Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed • obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26 feet b The maximum inside turn radws shall be 24 feet c The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50 feet d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45 feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) ~ Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 3 3 Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards 4 Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus . access road to all regwred budding exterior openings Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1 The following design requirements apply a Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are regwred to be submitted to Fve Construction Services (FCS) for approval Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS b Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward c Gates may be motorized or manual d When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet e Manual gates must be egwpped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20 00 f Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. g The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and afail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction • h Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch The switch must be installed outside the gate in a wsible and unobstructed location. i For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation Bi-duectional or multiple sensors may be regwred due to complexity of the various entry configurations 6 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 7 Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or budding construction Plan check submittal is regwred with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is regwred prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the iudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. . 4 p,EtF,S~'t9 Compressed Gases • Cryogenics Flammable and Combustible Ligwds Hazardous Materials Liquefied Petroleum Gases Public Assembly LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings Welding and Cutting Operations Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Urnfied Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Bwlding & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting speafic hazardous materials disclosure requirements. A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility 2 Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is requred to submit a Plan, is also • regwred to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Budding, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee FCS-14 Map Recordation 1 Reciprocal Access Agreement The plan as submitted indicate that the regwred Fire Department • access a Is located on property which is not under the control of the applicant, or Crosses a property line, or Is shared by multiple owners, or . Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire District The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fue Distract approval The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino To assist Fire Construction Services in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal a The current title reports to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties included in the agreement b The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subject to the agreement c A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire Distract access, the width, turn radu and slope of roadway surface shall be provided The access roadway shall comply with the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement The plans as submitted indicate that a regwred pnvate fire mains or appurtenances • a Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant; or b Crosses a property line; or c Provide service to adjacent properties; or d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association, or Is shared by multiple owners. Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the prroate water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection equipment essential to the water supply. The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract The agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1 is regwred prior to the issuance of grading or building permits ptf/~F,~ ~`J'~ Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions • PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1 Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for revew and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is regwred pnor to any bwlding permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems. The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped • 3 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fue Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed - at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 4 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services 5 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fue Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, °Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, • the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 7 D ~ E I ~",, 0152. Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on- sitefire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for . hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code Fire Sprinkler System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services Fire Sprinkler Monitoring• Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler momtonng system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power) 5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other speaal hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service 6 Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7 Access Control Gates Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted m accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fue • Construction Services The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all regwred fire access roadways. 9 Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When bwldmg setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry 10 Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commeraaVindustnal and multi- family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, wsible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the bwldmg setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be regwred on buldings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commeraal and industrial buildings The swte designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites 11 Fuel Modification Please refer to RCFPD Summary of Fire Hazardous Area regwrements • pi~~f=,C~ l53 12 Hazardous Materials Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk . Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fue Construction Services 13 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subiect bwlding or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 14 Mapping Site Plan Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'/z" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site m accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and bwldmg features as regwred in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector U • p, E, r,e~~5y - T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE. January 11, 2006 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM• Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner BY Candyce Burnett, Associate Planner SUBJECT CONSIDERATION TO INITIATE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2005-01104 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request by Robert Bathish and Ken Wilson to change the General Plan land use designation from Medium-High (14-24 du/acre) and General Commercal (GC) to Mixed Use for approximately 3 8 acres of land, generally located south of the rail road right of way to Roberds Court and from Amethyst Avenue east 325 feet APN 0202-151-20, 0202-161-01, 02, 03, 04, and 05 Related Files . Development District Amendment DRC2005-01105, Landmark Designation DRC2005-00776 and Landmark Designation DRC2005-00777 CONSIDERATION TO INITIATE A DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005-01105 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request by Robert Bathish and Ken Wilson to change the Development District Map from Medwm-High (14-24 du/acre) and General Commercial (GC) to Mixed Use for approximately 3 8 acres of land, generally located south of the rail road right of way to Roberds Court and from Amethyst Avenue east 325 feet- APN•0202-151-20, 0202-161-01, 02, 03, 04, and 05 Related Fdes• General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01104, Landmark Designation DRC2005-00776 and Landmark Designation DRC2005-00777. BACKGROUND: The subject project area consists of 6 lots with 6 existing legal non-conforming homes, one vacant parcel, and the Cucamonga Valley Water District water tank factlity within the Medwm-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units/acre) and General Commercial zones Single-family detached homes are anon-conforming use in the Medwm-High Residential and General Commercal zones; therefore, the homes cannot be enlarged or significantly altered. Most of the homes in this area are over 50 years old and are listed in the Designated and Potential Historical Site List as Potential Local Landmarks or a Point of Interest On September 21, 2005 the City Council reviewed a request from Chris Nichols (tenant at 9532 Roberds Court) to initiate an application to designate the original Roberds House (9532 Roberds Court) and the Nazarene Church (7201 Amethyst Avenue) as Historic Landmarks. The City Councl • recommended the Historic Preservation Commission consider the Historic Landmark Designation of these two properties. A copy of the September 21, 2005 staff report is attached (Exhibit A) ITEMS H R I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-0114 A REQUEST TO INITIATE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005-01105 • January 11, 2006 Page 2 In response to the Landmark Designation initiation, on November 21, 2005 a letter was received by Robert Bathish (owner of 7201 Amethyst Avenue) and Ken Wilson (owner of 9532 Roberds Court) requesting the Planning Commission initiate a General Plan land use designation amendment (Exhibit B) The amendment was requested because of the non-conforming status of their properties and their desire to develop for residential uses that are compatible with the existing residential uses in the area Under the existing zoning, they could bwld commeraal development or multiple-family/single-family attached housing units These uses would be inconsistent with the existing character and development of this single-family residential area A conceptual master plan for the subject project area will be presented A Development Distract Map amendment is necessary for consistency with the General Plan land use designation ANALYSIS: Amending the General Plan land use designation and the Development Distract Map from Medwm-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units/acre) and General Commeraal (GC) to Mixed Use (Low-Medwm Residential) would make the zoning of these lots consistent with the existing single-family development and the histonc character of the area Additionally, these changes will permit the resident to enlarge their existing structures and promote future development that is more consistent with the surrounding neighborhood. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends further study of the issue and the initiation of a General Plan Amendment and a Development Distract Amendment. • Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~~ olema Acting City Planner DC CB/bt Attachment- Exhibit A -Staff Report dated September 21, 2005 Exhibit B -Letter from Robert Bathish and Ken Wilson dated November 21, 2005 i r ~~~ ~ C I T Y RANCH O UCAMONGA Staff Report DATE September 21, 2005 TO Mayor and Members of the Clty Council Jack Lam, AICP, Clty Manager FROM Dan Coleman, Acting Clty Planner BY Knstln Wnek, Planning Aide SUBJECT• LANDMARK DESIGNATIONS DRC2005-00777 AND DRC2005-00776 - CHRIS NICHOLS - A request to initiate an application to designate the original Roberd's House located at 9532 Roberds Court and the Nazarene Church located at 7201 Amethyst Street as Designated Local Landmarks-APN 202-161-05-APN. 202-161-04 • RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Clty Council Initlate an application so the Historic Preservation Commission can consider the Hlstonc Landmark Designation of the onglnal Roberd's House and the Nazarene Church. BACKGROUND: In 1988 the Hlstonc Preservatlon Commisslon reviewed the designation of the property located at 7201 Amethyst Street and approved it as a Point of Historic Interest The property located at 9532 Roberd's Court has not been considered to date The original Roberd's house was built in 1913 by Harry Roberds and his wife Rilla and is considered to be the first house built in Alta Loma During the 1920s the Roberds felt this dwelling was too small to support their family so they had it moved to its current site on Roberd's Court They then purchased the Nazarene Church and had It moved to the site on Amethyst Street where It is currently located ANALYSIS: The attached Staff Report from June 2, 1988 provides a detailed analysis of the historical and cultural significance of the Nazarene Church (Second Roberd's House) CONCLUSION: Basec~,cq the request by Chris Nichols, staff is recommending that Applications for HI ric La mark D sig anon be considered for the subtect properties Dan Coleman Acting City Planner Attachment Exhibit A -Staff Report dated June 2, 1988 . Exhibit 6 -Letter from Chris Nichols requesting Landmark Designation for 9532 Roberd's Court and 7201 Amethyst Street- Dated August 22, 2005 Exhibit C -Pictures Exhibit D -Location Map EXHIBIT A ~~ ~J' 1 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT - ..- DATE: June 2, 1988 T0: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE ROBERDS HOUSE, 7201 AMETHYST I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: oca ion: a Ouse s orated on an L-shaped parcel, on the eas~i3e of Amethyst, immediately south of the Pacific Electric Railroad Tracks and the Water District storage tanks. B. Site Land Uses - Zonin -General Plan Desi nation: The site is a s ng a am y res ence. a zon ng s Medium-High Density Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and is designated H, High Density Residential (24-30 dwelling units • per acre) on the General Plan Land Use Map. C. Surroundin Land Use - Zonin -General Plan Desi nation: or - a er ~s ric proper y w s orage an s; oned and Designated MH, Medium-High Density Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) South - Single family residence; Zoned GC, General Commercial and the General Plan Designation is Commercial. General Commercial is more intensive than Office/Professional or Neighborhood Commercial District and can include major shopping facilities, major service-oriented uses and major financial and corporate headquarters. East - Senior housing development; Zoning is SHOD, Senior Housing Overlay District; General Plan is High Density Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre). West - Across Amethyst are the railroad tracks and vacant land. zoning is GC, General Commercial and General Plan Designation is Commercial. D. Descri tion: The 1-1/2 story house is barely visible from the s ree ecause of dense vegetation. The State Historic Resources Inventory form characterizes it as a Craftsman style structure. Outstanding features include the long shed dormer, the gabled portico with simple stickwork in the pediment, many multi-paned windows and French doors, exposed beams and raftertails, and large round cement columns with simple caps which support the porch and the pergola along the north side. s2 1 HISTORIC PRESERVAT' aFF REPORT RE: ROBERDS HOUSE June 2, 1988 Page 2 The house has a garage at the end of the driveway. The lot is large, nearly one acre. II. ANALYSIS• A. Back round - Current: This property was selected from the list o po en is an marks as part of the City's program to designate its landmarks and points of interest in an orderly fashion. B. Back round - Historic: Information on this property comes from e a e is or c RCalifornial1880t1980 by Martha St be e~' History of Alta Loma, a. Rilla Roberds was the daughter of Douglas W. Stephens, pioneer vineyardist of Cucamonga. Harry and Rilla Roberds built the first home in the Alta Loma Townsite on this land. They had been married in 1913 and both worked in the first packing house. They rode around town on a Twin Indian motorcycle. In the twenties, after their son, Ron, was born, they moved their • small house farther south and bought the Nazarene Church, located about a mile away at Archibald, 40 acres south of Base Line, and moved it to the original site of the first house. They remodeled the church into a home. The Roberd's telephone was used when there was a fire. The first fire engine was kept in a garage lust north of their property. Ri11a Roberds would run out and wave at the service station when a fire call came. The east-west street 200 feet south of the site is called Roberds Court. The Roberds family once owned most of the land south of the tracks down to Base Line on both sides of Amethyst. C. Si nificance of the Roberds House: The Roberds House has severs ea ures an assoc a ons that give it local significance. Its architecture is of special interest because it is an example of early "adaptive reuse" and because it is a (simple) Craftsman style structure. It is significant also because the Roberds family is well known. Mrs. Roberds is a member of the pioneering Stephens family, and Mr. Roberds built the first house within the Alta Loma Townsite. D. Relevant City Policies: This house is on the edge of Otd Town • oma. a eneral Plan calls for the preparation of a Neighborhood District Plan to preserve the character of this area . E. Issues: The property is zoned for Medium-High Density Re~fiBehtial use. A single family residence is a non-conforming ,y£ Z'S HISTORIC PRESERVATI~ RE: ROBERDS HOUSE June 2, 1988 Page 3 STAFF REPORT • use in this zone; therefore, the house cannot be enlarged. The size of the lot and the non-conforming status of the house raises a question about how long the property will remain as it is. Changing the City code to allow, with a Conditional Use Permit, expansion of non-conforming uses that are historic landmarks if such expansion would not adversely affect adjacent property would help preserve such landmarks. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Roberds house meets several criteria in e is oric reservation Ordinance: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: 1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical period and style. 2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which was once common but is now rare. 3. The proposed landmark was connected with a local personality. B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting. 1. The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. 2. The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood and community (Ord. 70 S9, 1979). IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Staff has talked to a member of the family while vis ng a site. The owner has been notified, as well as owners within 300 feet. This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation omm ss on recommend to the City Council that they designate the Roberds House, 7201 Amethyst Avenue, a Historic Landmark because the site meets the criteria of the Ordinance and designation is in harmony with the General Plan. Respectfully submitted, " ~ Henderson Senior Planner LH:AB:ko Attachments: State Historic Resources Inventory Form Landmarks Application ~ Photographs ~~ L. (p u r 1 U .~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONBA AU6 2 5 2005 • Bill Alexander, Mayor of Rancho Cucamonga ,All Council Members August 22, 2005 RECEIVEC -PLANNING • r1 ~J Re: Assessor Parcel 1120216104 7201 Amethyst Ave Alta Loma, (`alifivnia 91701 Muni©pa] Code: Section 224.100 Dear Maya and City Council Members, dAAMMIISTRA ~ AUG 252~`i I am writing this letter to initiate an application to malting said property a designated landmark Please review all enclosed infonnatioa. The informati~ was tak® out of the honk "I-listory Of Alta Loma". The pamphlet informanori has a cePY of the cove attached to it I have hued in Alta Loma since 1964 and of course have experienced the dramatic growrth and change of the community that surrounds "Old Town Alta Loma". The house I live in, 9532 ltoberds Ct is the first house to be built in Alta Lama and was originally at the Amethyst address. As it states in the enclosed information when the house became too small fa her gravving family, Mrs. Roberds moved it to its currart address on Roberds and moved in the Naar®e church to the Amethyst address to acca®modate ha growing family. R'e have last so many of our historical houses and settings, through demolition or natural disasters, I feel it is a shame to let one of the first dwellings of Alta Loma fall to the hands of developers and be demolished, Yet again losmg our wonderfid heritage to uncaring hands. ALso in front of the Amethyst house is a redwood that is 100+ years old and would surely became firewood if the development continues. Please stop by the above address, 7201 Amethyst, and view the true magnificence of the tree far ytairaeli I have a true love and feel very passionate about the history of Alta Lama and have often felt it has be® lost io the shuffle of money and developers. I rent the house I live in at 9532 ]toberds and have lived there fa 12 years. I have lived in this duect neighborhood far more than 20 years. I have several times tried to buy the house I am i4 but to no avail. My current landlord is not an Alta Loman native, but he does have great respect far the history and culture of the area. There are people trying to buy the land at 7201 Amethyst and trying to buy the 3 houses here ~ ltoberds Since my house is the srst house in Alta Lana I would also like to apply for it to be an historical landmark, but I could find no parcel number for it I feel that time is of the essence fa my application to be submitted, because the owners of these Properties are tempted by the offer of money. My hope is to at least preserve one a both of these hoi>ses. The next page are the signatures of my neighbors, all which have been in Uie neighborhood 30+ years and some of which are decedents of the original settlers. `~~~~- ' Nch 9532 ltobads Ct Alin Latta, Cali£ ~£T~ August 22, 2005 The following sigoanaes have ®dorsed the application far 7201 Amethyst and 9532 Roberds Ct. to become historical landmarks in the Rancho G~camonga "Old Tawn Alta Loma" area. • • /~£Z$ 7201 Amethyst .+~1 ,w~. - y!. _x i a~J !) ~sw S ai I 1.'.rri i. t I i Y I4 "9 T t _> w r 1 ° .. - _ ~ J r ail w ] SF h' ` ~~ ~ , ~ e ~ ~.~ ~ . " y ' ~ ~. : obi i _ ) ~ ~ ~ ~~~FJ +~~~ 1~ - 5 t x55{• `0. ~q Y~ ~ , ~ I Ylr ~ r ~ ~ _ _.. 5 n n_ _ a Y. i~"li ^t~ ~ _ ° 51'~• YL~gTS wtie ` a . - ` ~ ') `" ~ }r . ~ yt,a ~~,~~i ~". ~«`, ,y i ~7~gi~1µ~'~ ~z - ~ {` r `F,. ; ~~ ~ ~r s ` ~~ ~~r' l rn' "i'a;..- ,ria . .-s ~, " ` '~ ~+ C' `~ ' , :v ,5 ~ ~i~' ,4) 1f.9yM,~. ,5 ~y ~ ~ ~ v -` - .'t r Ss' ~-"., ' ~,'~ i.a ~ ~ ' ~~y ~"° - , ^ '~' ~ r ~~ - i;- f N y t, ~~~` < - .~ S ii` r.r' ' s; j3 , yj ~ ' _ 'li. A ? )_ n „ , .r; .. uu 3riw ~ -Prra„ a ~ v~r T 3~ r ~ ~5 :1' - Y r Y i ' . _' ~ Li ^r - - r':M; -" ~ _ -Y _ ~ n ' a _`~. d1.3.'3 C-~°,E_ ^. rr ::- .0,1 -. ' t w u. r _ ^ :~' a.. ~ _ ._~^.,v .k, ~5 •Y^t Y ~ £ t ~'+ ' ~~ ~ it ,!r - 7201 Amethyst • H~~io .,~ ~~ ~ ~ ~_ N -w~ • u LOMITA 20216104 ~/. ~' 7228 7216 7250 ~ 7266 y~ Q~ ~~ ~ 9464 7230 20216105 ~ 7235 9 ~ ROBERDS 7251 19541 7289 BASE LINE CIE SUBJECT PARCELS 200 0 200 400 Feet 9560 9588 _~ EXHIBIT _ SITE LOCATION MAP DRC2005-00776 DRC2005-00777 ~ ~~ I2, • November 21, 2005 City of Rancho Cucamonga C!O Chair Members of the Planning Commission 10500 Ciwc Center Dnve cho-Carzmonga~A-9'1730 RE: Consideration of General Land Use Plan Amendment. Parcels APN: 202-161- 04 Robert Bathish, Owner and APN: 202-161-05 Ken Wilson Dear Planning Commission, We are asking for you to approve an initiation of general land use amendment for the above mentioned parcels. The area in general on Amethyst, North of Baseline and below 19'" street, have irregular zonings (residential, residential point of interests mixed with commercial) and a master plan has never been conducted or updated. I think Ken and I are both willing to work with the City Planning to come up with a practical solution for all parties involved including our neighbors that have been long tens residents. So with that said, if you can initiate a General Land Use Plan Amendment we will all work toward a goal that satisfies all concerned and overall commurnty. We have hired Enk Peterson, architect, from CEDG (working with Sam Maloof currently) whom is familiar with the site due to the DRC2005-00174 work to submit a conceptual master plan for our immediate area We also welcome the planning commission to wsit our properties any Gme. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Robert Bathish -1248 %fCen Wilson 909-559-4826 GrJ-18 12obe,zrS C~t ~ (~ 1.~.. c,~ °I f~ 1 EXHIBIT B N ~_ ~3 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 20 • Less Than 9Bmbcant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially SiBmhcant Wrth Mitigation Than SiBnihwnt No I act Inco retetl 1 act I tl Comments• a) The prolect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out A Noise Impact Analysis was prepared by LSA Associates, Inc dated November 23, 2004 The Noise Study concludes the mitigation measures listed below would reduce exterior and interior noise levels to less-than-significant levels 1) A 12-foot sound wall along the southern boundary of the prolect along Foothill Boulevard is required This sound wall can consist of berms and concrete~~ ~m _~~ ~ ~~ '~"G'~ ~' ~ masonry units. urtlezh ti~~~ ,.ie~~ ~o~r~i~l><au~-' 2) A sound wall along the western boundary of the project with height gradually Y~f decreasing from 12 feet near Foothill Boulevard to 8 feet near the internal a driveway is regwred. ~lrc~'~" 3) An air conditioning system for all dwelling units with direct line-of-sight to ~"~ Foothill Boulevard traffic is required. t ~ 4) Building fagade enhancements or upgrades, such as double-paned windows uired for all re STC 32 tS ~ 5 V~ q , are - with a minimum sound transmission class (STC) of y~ ~~ dwelling units in the southern most row of buildings along Foothill Boulevard. 5) A 5-foot sound wall along the southern balcony perimeter is required for all osed to lconies ex th b ~~~~.,{~ p a dwelling units in the southernmost row of buildings wi Foothill Boulevard traffic. The sound wall can be constructed with a KGig~ combination of wood and plexiglass, with no gaps. ~•,_,.,,~ ,,,, -~ YC~ b) The uses associated with this type of prolect normally do not induce ground borne vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the prolect d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 6) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6.30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 7) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, If noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If p,Ei~'i~55 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 21 Less Tnen ~ $IONIICanI La55 Potentially Wlm Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources SIBnd,wnt Mlopaeon SIgN(cant No I act Inco led 1 att I act noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 8) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the+potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be required 9) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The protect site is located approximately 4 1/2 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the pro/ect () () () (/) a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the () () () (/) construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments: a) The protect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce substantial population growth Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area No impacts are anticipated b) The protect site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c) The protect site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated • • DrEi~,GSb PCOMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-05 D C21004 00268 - LEW IS INVESTMENT CO Jan 2006 Page 9 • 6) Landscaping Plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbiades Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits 7) Prior to issuance of Bwlding Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WOMP, including a protect description and identifying BMPs that will beused on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 8) Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the W aste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Budding Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise 1) A 12-foot sound wall along the southern boundary of the protect along Foothill Boulevard is regwred This sound wall can consist of berms and concrete masonry units. 2) A sound wall along the western boundary of the protect with height gradually decreasing from 12 feet near Foothill Boulevard to 8 feet near the internal driveway is regwred 3) An air conditioning system for all dwelling units with direct line-of-sight to Foothill Boulevard traffic is regwred 4) Bwiding facade enhancements or upgrades, such as double-paned windows with a minimum sound transmission class (STC) of STC-32, are regwred for all dwelling units in the southern most row of buildings along Foothill Boulevard 5) A 5-foot sound wall along the southern balcony perimeter is regwred for all dwelling units in the southernmost row of bwldmgs with balconies exposed to Foothill Boulevard traffic The sound wall can be constructed with a combination of wood and plexiglass, with no gaps • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-05 DRC21004-00268 - LEW IS INVESTMENT CO January 11, 2006 Page 10 6) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of • 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 7) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified m Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified m Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be regwred by the Building Offical Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if nose levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Bwlding Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 8) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase 9) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent • feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST Pam Stewart, Chairman Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of January 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES• COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT' COMMISSIONERS p~E,F,9 (a3 Planning Commission Meeting of RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN-UP SHEET Please print your name, address, and city and indicate the item you have spoken regarding. Thank you 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 NAME ADDRESS ~~ ~ V1 li i'~~G,~ clTv ITEM f Q~ l,U 6 C~~ ~ ~~~ W ~- S s T ~ ~ ~--f{ 3 S ~ W X9 ~ ssi a v ~ S p S 5^` f 3 ~ ~ Q j~o Z Z ~€ ~ g ¢ a ~~~ ~ 9 ~/~ V~ y U 3~$~ F S 5 o ~1~~~ ! 4 F ~ :: i~ i $ri U a 5 a S ~ ~~B ~~~ ~k R 8 ~~~ ~q t Y~: a~b A^ §~~ ~$e _`y+ eo~ Asl 9 :`~~ gJ ~^~ ~ff~d gg A~b §~~ y Wasp g. CC A~: WW 4 1Y f ?p+~ $ ~ V a ~ V°~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ 3 •y~§ X33 All ~1 ~ ~ a ~ o U ~ ~ ^ N O K W Q1 ^' K ~~y S A~~u o~ ~°~~ R i Aei e gi Ys ~" ~ i 9~" n ~~~ ~ ~ „ O a a ~ ~ w x U N ZQ 3f1N3ntl 1SAH13WV J a ~ ~ ~ : 3Atl Q1tlSIH~Ntl y F W H_ ~ ~ E ~ K 3Atl 1SAH13Wtl w m a f z_ 3Atl NtlWll3H V h z N : s y~ ~ N ~ t N ~ ~ ~_ ~ ~~~ Z Z ~ §~ ~~; wig g ~~~ ~~~ 04 ~~~ ~~~ gg t8 ks~ ~~~ s33 a ~~ g ~~ _ ~a°~ p ~ 44. ~~~ ~~$ s ° N • W 61 R ~ 4 ~ Rp~q o ~ ~~~ 0 5yy s~~ ~~. $444. ~~ P54 3 .PBL 8 y 3 C ® ~ W `¢N b 1 O C 3r1N3~V 1S.1H13WV i i anv aiveiHOav N Q H N s 3AV NtlW1l3H C N J o a E-~ ~'