Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006/01/25 - Agenda Packet~u~ • • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RnNCeo JANUARY 25, 2006 - 7:00 PM CUCAMONGA Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Stewart Vice Chairman Maaas Fletcher _ McNiel_ McPhad_ II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES January 11, 2006 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings m which concerned indiwduals may voice their opinion of the related pro/ect Please wait to be recognrzed by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be l~mrted to 5 minutes per individual for each protect Please sign in after speaking A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTAND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17166 - PGP PARTNERS INC - A request to subdivide a 20 2 acre property containing 16 industrial buildings into 16 numbered lots m Subareas 4 and 5 in the General Industrial Zone, located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Crescent Center Drive - APN 0210-071-52 thru 56 Related File Development Review DRC2003-00072 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA JANUARY 25, 2006 C~ ONGA 2 B ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16867 - ETCO INVESTMENTS -The proposed subdivision of 8 9 gross acres of land into 12 residential lots in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of the I-210 Freeway -APN 0225-171-19 Related File Variance DRC2004-01285 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration Item continued from January 11, 2006 C VARIANCE DRC2004-01285 - ETCO INVESTMENTS -Requests to reduce the minimum depth of Lot 10 from 200 feet to 180 feet to allow Lot 11 to have frontage along Etiwanda Avenue and to allow Lot 12 to also have frontage along Etiwanda Avenue and a reduced minimum width from 90 feet to 75 feet Also, a request to construct a sound wall with a height in excess of 8 feet All variance requests are related to Tentative Tract Map 16867, the subdivision of 12 single-family residential homes on 8 9 gross acres of land in the Very Low Residential Distract (1-2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of the I-210 Freeway -APN 225-171-19 Related File Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 Item continued from January 11, 2006 V. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS D A REQUEST TO INITIATE DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2005-01083 - SAHGA GROUP - A request to amend Table 17 32 030 -Use Regulations for Foothill Boulevard Districts of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, adding Thrift Stores as a conditionally permitted use in Subarea 2 of the Community Commercial Distracts, located along Foothill Boulevard between Cucamonga Creek and Hellman Avenue E REVIEW OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00850 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES/AIM ALL STORAGE - A review of the construction and operation of an existing Aim All public storage facility on 6 13 acres in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and the east 210 Freeway on-ramp The purpose of this review is to ensure that it is being operated in a manner consistent • n U n U n lJ • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA JANUARY 25, 2006 c~' oNCn 3 with condltlons of approval or In a manner which Is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially inlurlous to properties In the vlcinlty pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17 04 035 G 2 -APN 1076-331-02 and 1076-341-01 Related file Variance DRC2004-00050 VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda VII. COMMISSION BUSINESS VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m ad/ournment time Ifttems go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL ADJOURN TO A WORKSHOP IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING TO DISCUSS PRE- APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2005-01092 - RICHARD DICK & ASSOCIATES AND PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2005-01094 - WORKFORCE HOMEBUILDERS LLC. 1, Lots J Schrader, Planning commtsston Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on January 19, 2006, of least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 of 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga If you need special assistance or accommodations to partiapate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Diwsion at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ® ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired Vicinity Map Planning Commission Meeting ~ January 25, 2006 C~ ~ Meeting Location. Rancho Cucamonga City Hall 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 N A /\/ City Boundary (as of 12/20/2005) ~J I SPHERE OF INFLUENCE C~ • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO cUCAMONGA JANUARY 25, 2006 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California MEETING CANCELED NO ITEMS SUBMITTED 1, Lois J Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on January 19, 2006, at least 72 hours pnor to the meeting perGovemment Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga osd . ~~i-~' ~ J, T H E C I T Y O F RANCflO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE January 25, 2006 TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Dan Coleman, Acting Clty Planner BY Vance Pomeroy, Contract Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17166 - PGP PARTNERS, INC - A request to subdivide a 20.2 acre property containing 16 Industrial buildings into 16 numbered lots in Subareas 4 and 5 in the General Industrial Zone, located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Crescent Center Drive - APN 0210-071-52 thru 56 Related Flle. Development Review DRC2003-00072 • PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION• A Surrounding Land Use and Zonino: North - Industrial, General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) South - Industrial; General Industrial (Subarea 5) East - Industrial; General Industrial (Subarea 5) West - Residential Low-Medium Density (4-8 dwelling units per acre) B General Plan Designations Protect Slte - General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) North - General Industrial (Subareas4 and 5) South - General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) East - General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) West - Low-Medlum Resldentlal C. Site Characteristics: The subject site is a flat property generally sloping to the south that - Is currently improved with 16 separate industrial buildings under single ownership. ANALYSIS. A General. The subject site Is currently improved with 16 industrial buildings under single ownership, seven of the buildings are of recent construction. All buildings are accessed through a private driveway The subdivision of this property will effectively re-plat the • existing 5-lot map (Parcel Map 7012) into 15 numbered lots for the buildings (with the Item A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT17166-PGP PARTNERS, INC January 25, 2006 Page 2 two front buildings on 1 lot) and 1 numbered lot for the pnvate driveway access. No changes are proposed or needed for the buildings as a result of the map, and the parcels meet the mirnmum regwrements for the zone and Subareas B. Desion Review Committee: The Committee reviewed the protect on November 15, 2005, and recommended approval as presented C. Technical Review Committee The Committee reviewed the protect and recommended approval subtect to the conditions outlined in the attached Draft Resolution of Approval D. Environmental Assessment: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study. Staff completed Part II of the Irntial Study and found that there would be no sigrnficant adverse environmental impacts. A Negative Declaration has been prepared for adoption. CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the protect site. - RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17166 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions and issuance of a DC:VP/ge Attachments: Exhibit A -Tentative Tract Map Exhibit B -Design Review Committee Action Commerrts Dated November 15, 2005 Exhibit C -Initial Study Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17166 • ~- a- Dan Coleman Acting City Planner t I rte. @ ~ ~;eaef f~~ SELTp1ti`- TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11166 SELpM~ B c r~: ~ f ~~~; ss ~ fil~F;g -~° ..T.~ pl .o~{~_ ___ ~.~.. ttcncx~-c scc ~a+v o-o LE01L oeeexronox 4tlQ68 i.« ° dG61S!![ ~.wo.. wi ~m ` ."m.~ ~... ...... ~...q pROpERTY 1HHREHH PREPMITIOM 011E m a m PM MOPERTY ZOMMO pROEERIY 1RE1 HOHOIN80N TYPE UT L TY pURYEYONH +~irni..se.~~ mopo~HEO Ma ~e..'T.,...w ~~.~~ w... N Q 4RIlKK S ,~•... JI 3 1~9 a +V UUW SS C DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 05 p m Vance Pomeroy November 15, 2005 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17166 - PGP PARTNERS, INC - A request to subdivide a 20 2 acre property containing 16 industrial buildings into 15 numbered lots and 1 lettered for condominium purposes in the General Industrial Zone (Subareas 4 and 5), located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Crescent Center Drive - APN 0210-071-52, 53, 54, 55, and 56 Related file Development Review DRC2003-00072 Design Parameters The subtect site is currently improved with 16 industrial buildings under single ownership Seven of the bwldings are of recent construction All buildings are accessed through a private driveway The subdivision of this properly will effectively re-plat the existing 5-lot map (Parcel Map 7012) into 15 numbered lots for the buildings (with the two front buildings on 1 lot) and 1 lettered lot for the private driveway access No changes are proposed or needed forthe buildings as a result of the map, and the parcels meet the minimum regwrements for the zone and Subareas Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Committee recommend approval of the proposed tract map as submitted to the Planning Commission Design Review Committee Action Members Present McPhail, Stewart, Coleman Staff Planner Vance Pomeroy The Committee recommended approval of the protect as presented EXHIBIT B ~_~ ~,~ ~, ~- Gy d Rancho CLCandipa PtraJp Lri4V, 1s~) maeo RANCHO CUCAI~OIIBA JAN 212003 ,~ ENVIRONMENTAL ' INFORMATION FORM RECEIVED-Pt.AM~gl6 (part I -Initial Study} (/ease lypa a prlrrl clearly wlnp Ink Use era d6 key ro moo /rom orra Dee ro Ura nart Ynaa INCOMPLE7EAPPLICATIONSWILLNOTBEPROCESSED Please notefheflffsMemsponsldRryo/fMappgcertffoansuretlwf the epp//oeflon fe complete et the tlnle of su6mktal, Clly sfefl wCl not be avar7etlfe to perform work required ro prodde missing lnlomaflae. AppUcabo~ Numbarlor ~t1d~2/'DR~2c~~ ProJecf nae• _~ Name B Address dpro%of owner(sJ: i ~yr Nerve 6 Address oI dereloperor pr%d sponsor. ~,~ Zoe Goofed Person B Address: ETtYC ~//}/V p E Q (~A? G 2la~b ~Or~ Ptlrrdd(1 ~ f {~ ~d rc.c, froY esr~C,r~ 42 coo IVanre 8 Address o/ person preparing this farm (d dHlerent Flom above): 7wMehrvra Numtser' 1 \ "1 ~t ~ Z.O ~° ~ I2.1~D EXHIBIT C X10,9 ~-s- ~d~,~~,~,pa,- MRY-21-2004 13 39 19494210989 96i P.02 .- ~ ~ Informeaon )ndketed by en astenslt f 7 is not Bquhed of nonconstruabn CUP's unless ofhenvise requested by slaty. •1) pronda a full scale (B-7R r,71) SAY of the USGS Ouedranf Sheet(s) whrrh inaudes the protect stye, end Indkate the ske boundaries- _ 2) Provrda a sat of Caor photographs fhaf ahowa[ceSS pofnt~s that serve fha sRe; ~ res~ tlve views of ~ ~~ views n and 1~ the site hom the primary significant features ~ the sde. lnaude a map showrng kxeflon of each pAo/fo_B,mnPh• 3) protect-•pceHOn (descdbe): ~ ~ ~~ III.V ~~ ~~n I VJGtI'~ /7/~ q assessor's Parcel Numbers (effacA edditlonel shoat 1f newsssry): •s7 (',mss Stye Area (edaq. R): •6) /tat Sire Area (fast ske size minus area of pubQc sheets d proposed ~ r ~ . dedreaflons nerel an amerdmant a zone thartge ~~ wouM eRect the prq/act alto ~ Descdbe any pml~: (ettedr addmanel p/ftsndro Cueamongo and other B) Inducts a da>cdPtlm d all pemdts whhh aM be neoessery from }he Gty mmenfe/ ager+aes In order fo fully Mipiement the Pro)eer two .. _....~.~- n.TA,~na VY. t1 ' _ ~Pe6e z of s ~~ _ Geared on 5r1za0Q149a PM EnNmnnienblurraFOrmt.doc t1RY-21-2004 1339 19499210989 96i - P.03 g) Descnbo the pnyskar semng olthe site es it exrsts before the PrSlea irrcluding infimretlon on topograPhY. ~+T sfablfrty, p/ards and enhrrels, mature frees, trails end roads. drelnege courses, end stank espeds. Dascn'be any existing stnrcarres an sKe (Inauding age end condmon) and the use al the struQures. attach phaogrephs d srgnrlkant features tlescdbed rn addrbon, cite all yyurces of a,formetron (.e., lieofogkal and/or' hydrokgic siudres, bloat and arGteok9lrzil surveys, trefbc studios): _ ~ / n , • I ~ r I .. ~- I _..:11 •~ ~.,, \~ • C~ C_J r..... MRY-21-2004 13 39 19494210989 96i P 04 f0) Descnbe the /mown wttural and/or h1slorical aspects dfhe sda C!!e a0 sources d /rrlonr+adon (boobs, pu6!lslred reports and oral hbtary): _ L 11) DesvrDa ery noise souroas and fhek revels that Q0Y at/aCt dre site (etrcrart, roedwaY noise, etc) end how tlroy wIB 12J Desatbe the proposed pro)ecr In dereY rnls should provide en adequate desaipUon d the sRe pr terms d uwrneto use that wip result Imm the proposed prod indicate it there era Pad Phases ~ develapmerrt. the erder¢ d development fo occur wifA each Ohese, end the anticipated con>Dledar d each hraernerd Ntlaclr addNlorrel sheet(s) ~1..~ aeawnv - , ~J f 3) Describe the surrounding propeNes, induding lntarmafkn on plants and anlmels end any wlNral, hLttrxicel, a stank aspects. Indkefe the type of lend use (n:mdentrai. corrimerclal etc.). mfenslly o/Iand use (or~femAy, - . -.---- _,..,^^ .ro..nA.nwrtf stores- elc.l end scale O1 development (height, trordape, setback rear Yard. • of start-tens and longderm noise fo De generated, rneluding source erM emarrrf. stow waf brass lndkefe the type and ae.SNa uses Whet methods e(spmdproogng are prop08edT nose levels aAed ad/ecenf propefge9 L - .r _____ ~~`- ~ _ _ _ _ ^ •. 1~- •16) Indicate proposed removals end/or replaeamenb of mahne d scenic bees: .-~_~._~u-a.c..~• ~... Pans ~ t1RY-21-2004 13'39 19494210989 Creelsd on Sfy~l2002 4Aa PM gE,; P.05 14) 4YiN the proposed f~~ dredge y1B ~~• s~k or chareder of the sumwndmg genera! area d Ne pro)ed9 1 ~ Indicate any bodies of water (indudrng dpmesbc r~far suPPI~T) mto M'l'i~ the sde drains: • t8) /ndicafeexpededamounto/waterusage (SeeAHachmantA/uusaBeestunates). for furtherclaril~callon.doa~ contact th Gucemon9e ~untY WaterOLssnd et 887-2591. e. Resldantlel (9aVday) Peek use (gaUDay) -- SoD ~I/day ~ ) ~ SGb ti~~~~ ~°a~- b. ComnrerGeVlnd. (ga4day/ec)~ P~era~k use r/ec 19) Indicate proposed method olsawege disposal. 'l0/ t,70~~ ~Tenk ~'~~ Hsepfk: tanla are ProPo~ Mach percolation tests. H dtscharge to a sankary sewage system !s proposed indk;ale expected dally sewage generefkx>: (Sea Attachment A for usage estimates) For lusher cladfir~bon, please rzrrted the Curamonge CoutMy Wafer Dlddd et 887-2681. , a Resldentle! (geVdaY) b. Commarr;Ja4lndustrfel(gaVdaY/ac) ~50~~I ~~A) f ~ x YI.~J aG ~ ~~! 7J~~a~1KYW Mfr ~b ~~ lad ~a ~- ~ RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: f" ~ , Number olrasidBntiel unHs: ~_ Qg~¢pg (lndiwte range of parcel saes, mWmum lot titre end maximum lot shb: wfrather units are rents/ fX 1ar58fB asks): • 21) ,gngclpeted range Sale Pnoe(s) ReM(permonfh) S ~ SpeciynumberMbedrooms errdbr rarrt+r _ro S ~ro S 23) Indkafe enGcrpeted household size by unk type: ... _ ... _ a..._ ~ ~ e ~--q rmu.n „„ srnntm rna ou MRY-21-2004 13.39 19494210989 96'/. P.06 y ~ wr8fln dre Conrad the ePPreP^~e 24) irate the exp~ad number of schod chUdren who wJl be resrdm9 P~ S Dlsbrcts as show*r fn Attachment t3: a ~r• ~ ~ . b. Junior ~ Senior Mgh 25) Describe type o of se(s) end mefor fundbn(s) of commerelal, indusfnel or lnstBu8onel uses ~t ~ i~l w~a~ use u b ~ S l uses by trve~ ~ 26) Total Boor area d tomrrferrJal, lnd~~n~ 1Om ~-7 ~~ Mefdmum ShBN rm,e a Meslmum slrlt• ndudin -n end salary ranges, as web u an 1ndk:atlon of the 29) provkle breakdown of enbcipefed/ob dassl6w8ons, B ~ rare d hire far each dessifica8on (edam edfikbnsl t ~nO°eS'9OM' 2 28 7) indicate hours o/operetkxi: Number d empbyeex Tdal.• 30) Esilmetion of the number of workers to be hiredthat cyrrant/y reside -- na ~Y•' and amount ofafrpd/ufion endssiorts. (Date should ~1) For commercial and lndustnel uses arty, lnd~re ~ ~~~ tYPe e! Bf 8 572-6283)- be ven6ed through Ne souuf Coast ~ ouefdy Management Drstnct ( ) , _ 1 i _ . ,- .-l~,nln ~^ Dlenlc L I h/1 ~ ~D _~""" MRY-21-2004 13 39 ,~ 19494210989 ~re]led Oft tirlllPfR ~.Vy rm 97i P.07 -- ALL P____ R~~~CTS 32) Have the water, sewe4 fire, end flood control agoncres seMng the project been cordaded to determine thalr abgdy to pronde adequate service to theproposed WoJed1 Hso, Please indicate thatrrasPonse.^ n / 1 33) In the known history of fhh property, Ass there been any use. storage, or drscherge o/hazardous and/or fords materials? Examples of hazardous andor tack mefenels Include, but are not Umlted to PCB's, redloecWe substenoes; pesbudes and herbkMes; hre1s, oils, solvents, and other Aammetrt lrqulds end gases. Also note underground a~on~ o! any of fha above- Please gst the mefenels and desrnbe thalr use, storage, and/or disdrarga m the propaAy. as t/hnne dates d use, Nkrawn ~r'/ 34J WUI the proposed Proled revolve the femporery a krng-term use, storage or diseherge d hazardous and/or todc matenels, 4rdudirrg but not Ilmlted to those exempts Rsted above? f(yes, Provide en Inventory o/ell such metedals fo be used and proposed method o/dispose/. The locatlan of such uses. ekxrp wiM the sloraga end ehlpmen! arses, alra0 be shown end labeled on the epplkeflon plans ~• hereby certr4' that the statements lumished above and N the attached exhlbks present the date end lnfonrrefl~req~I adequate evaluaf/on o/Nu pro/ed to the best of my ebllMy, that the fads, statements, andUformetion~preaenfed ~~ ~~ an eeequate elmue6oncen~amedebyihe~oriRandw~ca+eamonea- neiinrormabona,aybereq Date: ~ • ~• D~ Srgnelwe: ,~/LCit~H~ Tdle: ~a~(/I ~ 1~1.~/1~ - ~ I ~~~~--CM/MIMf IM p. MRY-21-2004 13'40 19494210989 96i P.08 BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II 1. Project File: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17166 2. Related Files: Development Review DRC2003-00072 (approved June 25, 2003) 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SU8TT17166 -PGP PARTNERS INC - A request to subdivide a 20 2 acre property containing 16 industrial buildings into 16 numbered lots in Subareas 4 and 5 in the General Industrial Zone, located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Crescent Center Drive - APN 0210-071-52, 53, 54, 55, and 56 Related files Development Review DRC2003-00072 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: PGP Partners, Inc 21068 Bake Parkway, Suite 200 Lake Forest, CA 92630 5. General Plan Designation: General Industrial 6. Zoning: General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The sde is an existing business park located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, midway between 4th Street and 6th Street Currently, the protect area is an industrial block with access from Archibald Avenue The industrial block contains four streets Crescent Center Drive exists on the south side of the block, London Way is located on the west side of the industrial complex and connects to Crescent Center Drive, Hawthome Drive is on the north side of the block connecting with London Way, and Dover Way comprises of the additional area on the north side of the mdustnal complex connecting to both Hawthorne Drive and Crescent Center Drive Entrances for the mdustnal complex are located off of Archibald Avenue onto either Dover Way or Crescent Center Drive. Development to the north, south, and east is office and light industrial Directly to the west is an existing residential area, but to the south of the residential area are office bwldings and a college The area is currently zoned for General Industrial uses which includes office and administrative, light industry, and storage activities The protect would be in conformance according to the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Vance Pomeroy, Contract Planner (909)477-2750 10. Other agenaes whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None ~--~a Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17166 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB - Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management Distract URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages ()Agricultural Resources ()Cultural Resources () Hydrology/Water Quality ()Energy and Mineral Resources ONoise ()Recreation OMandatory Findings of Significa O Av Quality ()Geology/Soils ()Land Use/Planning () Population/Housmg () Transportationlfraffic ()Aesthetics ()Biological Resources ()Hazards & Hazardous Matenals ()Mineral Resources O Public Services ()Utilities/Service Systems DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (~) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Prepared By Reviewed B~ Date Z ~ Z ~ /~ Date ~ ~Z/~O X1--13 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17166 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 Less marl Sgnificant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources FotenLally $ignficant wrtn MNgaoan man Siprvficem No I C Into etl 1 I EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the protect a) Have a substantial affect a scenic wsta~ () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not () () () (/) limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic burfdmgs within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which () () () (/) would adversely affect day or nighttime wows m the area Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adtacent to the protect site. The sde is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 b) The protect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The site is located on the east side of Archibald Avenue within the existing Crescent Business Center industrial park and is characterized by office and industrial development to the north, south, and east To the west is a residential neighborhood and office complex The proposed subdmsion will create separate lots for each of the 16 existing buildings The casual quality of the area wrfl not degrade as a result of this protect City standards regwre the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to mwmize unsightly appearance of overhead utildy Imes and utility enclosures m accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The proposed subdivision will not create new light and glare because the site is fully developed 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect. a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland () () () (/) of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the Calrfomia Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Williamson Act contract c) Involve other changes m the existing environment which, () () () (/) due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments: a-c) The proposed subdmsion will not affect agricultural resources because the sde is fully developed. i ~}-"~ `7 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17166 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Less 71ien &gluficent Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g PMenoally Sipruficant wnn Mmpenon mee SiOrvficant No I h Into tail I 1 cl 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable () () () (/) av quality plats b) Violate any av quality standard or contribute substantially () () () (/) to an existing or protected air quality wolaUOn~ c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any () () () (/) criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non- attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () () () (/) concentrations e) Create obtectionable odors affecting a substantial number () () () (/) of people Comments• a-e) The proposed subdivision will not affect air quality because the site is fully developed J 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the protect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (/) through habitat modifications, on any species identrfied as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or () () () (/) other sensitive natural community identrfied in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected () () () (/) wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (Including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interzuption, or other means d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) _ resident or mlgratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or mlgratory wildlrfe corzidors, or impede the use of native wildirfe nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting () () () (/) biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () - () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan ~~ Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17166 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Leu rn>,n $IQNnLfltll L8S5 Issues and Supporting Information Sources v^l8n°00Y Spnhcant wrtn MNpauon rnan Sip,vfitent No I Into tetl I C I C Comments• a-f) The proposed subdivision will not affect biological resources because the site is fully developed The protect site is located in an existing business park developed with office and industrial uses 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the protect a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () () () (/) of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () () () (/) of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () () () (/) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries Comments: a-d) The proposed subdivision will not affect cultural resources because the site is fully developed 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the pro/ect a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, intury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated () () () (/) on the most recent Alquist-Paolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shakings O O O (/) m) Seismic-related ground failure, including O O O (/) liquefaction? iv) Landslides () () () (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () () () (/) c) Be located on a geologic untt or soil that is unstable, or () () () (/) that would become unstable as a result of the protect, ' and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B () () () (/) of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial _ _ risks to Irfe or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of () () () (/) septic tanks or attemative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water ~-~~ Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17166 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Lass Tlfan Sipn,ficant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources a°'a"°a"r Spiuficant wnn Auepaoon man Sipiehcenf No I Inm tail I I Comments: a-e) The proposed subdivision will not affect geology or sods because the site is fully developed No known faults pass through the site and rt is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is d in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Faun, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5 1 of the General Plan FEIR 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the pro/ect a) Create a signrficant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a signrficant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a prolect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the prolect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the prolect area t) For a prolect wthin the wantty of a private airstrip, would O O O (/) the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the prolect area g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere wdh an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (/) injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adfacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a-h) The proposed subdivision will not have any impact in hazards or waste materials because the sde is fully developed 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the pro/ect - a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () () () (/) requirements /f i Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17166 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Less Then &piaficant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially $igrvficant weh MIUgeUOn Than Significant No 1 en Inrn te0 I I n b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (/) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (/) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (/) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the () () () (/) capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () () () (/) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (/) winch would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (/) intury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp t) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (/) Comments: ay) The proposed subdivision will not have any impact in hydrology or water quality because the sde is fully developed 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the pro/ect: a) Physically divide an established community () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with turisdiction over the protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specrfic plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or () () () (/) natural community conservation plan ~3--i g \_J Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17166 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 Less man S1gniLCant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potanaally S,gmficam wan MNpaaon man Significant No I en Inco retetl I en I an Comments: a-c) The proposed subdivision will not have any land use or planning impact because the site is fully developed 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the protect a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of avadabllity of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments: a) The proposed subdivision will not have any land use or planning impact because the site is fully developed The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact r~ L b) The proposed subdivision will not have any land use or planning impact because the sde is fully developed The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery sde, therefore, there is no impact 11. NOISE. Would the protect result in. a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () () () (/) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) groundbome vibration or groundbome noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels () () () (/) in the protect vicinity above levels existing wthout the protect d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient () () () (/) noise levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels -- f) For a protect wthin the vicmdy of a private avstnp, would () () () (/) the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels Comments: a-f) The proposed subdivision will not have any noise impact because the site is fully developed ~'}-~ Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17166 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Less Then Sipnihcant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources `°~809~1y ^ygnifiCent vino Mnipahon man SigruM1Cem No I act Into ratetl 1 ect 1 an 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the protect a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (/) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the () () () (/) construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments• a-c) The proposed subdivision will not have any land use or planning impact because the site is fully developed 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the protect result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered govemmental facilities, need for new or physically altered govemmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other pertormance ob/ectives for any of the public services a) Fire protections O O O (/) b) Police protections O U O (/) c) Schools O O O (/) d) Parks O O O ('~) e) Other public facihties~ O O O (/) Comments: a-e) The proposed subdivision will not have any public service impact because the site is fully developed 14. RECREATION. Would the pro/ect~ a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional () () () (/) parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational facilities or require () () () (/) the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the - _ environment • Comments: . a-b) The proposed subdivision will not have any recreation impact because the site is fully developed _ f~-ao • • • Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17166 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Less man SipnNCent Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g rma"°~'Y SiPaficant wnn A44gaaon man $ipn,OCant No 1 Inrn ceU I n ~ ect 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the protect a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in () () () (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e , result in a substantial increase m either the number of vehicle taps, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either () () () (/) an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity () () () (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments: a-g) The proposed subdivision will not have any transportation impact because the site is fully developed 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the protect a) Exceed wastewater treatment regwrements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Regwre or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing faalities, the construction of which could cause signrticant environmental effects c) Regwre or result in the construction of new storm water () () () (/) drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant envronmental effects ~ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand m addition to the prowder's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to () () () (/) accommodate the protect's solid waste disposal needs ~-oZ ~ Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17166 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 Less Than $IQNfiCe11t L055 Issues and Supporting Information Sources Fotenaaliy Slpaficant won A4ugebM roan Slprvfiwnt No 1 C Intro 2tetl I R I g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste Comments• a-g) The proposed subdivision will not have any utility or service systems impact because the site is fully developed 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality () () () (/) of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory _ b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) c) Does the protect have environmental effects which will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments• a-c) The proposed subdivision will not have any impact because the sde is fully developed EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identrfied above for this protect were wdhin the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Indial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (/) General Plan FEIR -- (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (/) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) (/) Other Biological Assessment (Ecological Sciences in May 2003) • • /~"~~'~- • City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentatroe Tract Map SUBTT17166 Public Review Period Closes: January 25, 2006 Project Name: Project Applicant: PGP Partners, Inc Project Location (also see attached map): Located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Crescent Center Drive - APN. 0210-071-52, 53, 54, 55, and 56 Project Description: A request to subdivide a 20.2 acre property containing 16 mdustnal bwldings into 16 numbered lots m Subareas 4 and 5 m the General Industnal Zone. Related files: Development Review DRC2003-00072 FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study indicates that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is Included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Clvlc Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. January 25. 2006 Date of Determination Adopted By RESOLUTION NO 06-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17166, A 16 LOT SUBDIVISION OF 20.2 ACRES OF LAND IN SUBAREAS 4 AND 5 IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL ZONE, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND CRESCENT CENTER DRIVE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0210-071-52 THRU 56. A Recitals 1 PGP Partners, Inc., filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17166, as described m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 25th day of January 2006, the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. = 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, detemm~ed, and resolved by the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 25, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically fords as follows: a The application applies to the property located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Crescent Center Drive, with a street frontage of 569 feet and lot depth of 1,280 feet and is presently improved with 16 mdustnal buildings, and b The properly to the noRh of the subject site is mdustnal; the property to the south consists of mdustnal buildings; the property to the east is mdustnal; and the property to the west is single-family homes; and c. The development is proposed to subdivide the land and will not include the addition of any floor area; and d. All parking and arculation requirements are met. . - 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby fords and concludes as follows• y~au PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-05 SUBTT17166-PGP PARTNERS, INC January 25, 2006 Page 2 a That Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17166 is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speafic plans, and b The design or improvements of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17166 is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and The site is physically swtable for the type of development proposed, and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and e Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17166 is not likely to cause serous public health problems, and f The design of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17166 will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the Califoma Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared, therefore, reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of RegutaLOns, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the Califoma Code of Regulations. 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference C~ ~- a~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-05 SUBTT17166-PGP PARTNERS, INC January 25, 2006 Page 3 • Engineering Department 1) Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map Budding and Safety Department The following specific conditions apply to the protect prior to recordation of the final map Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17 22 030' 1) A copy of the proposed declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions will apply and shall include an agreementfor common area maintenance, including facilities and landscaping together with an estimate of the initial assessment fees anticipated for such maintenance; a description of a provision for maintenance of vehicular access areas within a protect; and an indication of appropriate responsibilitiestor maintenance of all utility Imes and services for each unit, and, 2) A physical elements report which shall include, but not limited to a) A report detailing the condition and estimating the remaining useful life of each element of the protect proposed for conversion: fire protection systems mcludmg automatic sprinkler system, alarm systems, or standpipe systems and structural elements b) A structural pest control report. A licensed structural pest control operator pursuant to Section 8516 of the Business and Professions Code shall prepare such report. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JANUARY 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary ~- a~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-05 SUBTT17166-PGP PARTNERS, INC January 25, 2006 Page 4 I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of January 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES• COMMISSIONERS• NOES' COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT COMMISSIONERS /~'~~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17166 SUBJECT: SUBDIVISION OF 20 2 ACRES APPLICANT: PGP PARTNERS, INC LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND CRSCENT CENTER DRIVE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Completion Date General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Cdy, ds _/~_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the attemative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, ds agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at ds sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition B. Time Limits 1 This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expve, unless extended by the Planning ~~_ Commission, unless a complete final map is filed wdh the City Engineer wdhin 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The sde shall be developed and maintained in accordance wdh the approved plans which include J~_ sde plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained harem, Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business actrvdy being commenced thereon, all Conditions J_J- of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Cdy Planner C-1-OS ~-~~, Pro)ect No SUBI"r17166 Comoletron Date 3 Occupancy of the facddies shall not commence until such time as all Unrform Bwldmg Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied wdh Prior to occupancy, plans shall be ' submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Budding and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and budding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All sde, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency pnor to issuance of any permts (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, budding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance wdh all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subfect to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs fast A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 8 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the Cdy Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of balding permits D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 3 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long W hen a side of any parking space abuts a bwlding, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adfacent to the parking stall (including curb) All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards -~-~- -~-~- ~~- -~-~- _/~_ _/~- -~-~- _/~_ ~~_ SC-1-OS ~-~,~ 2 Protect No SUBTr17166 Completion Date 4 Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of bwlding permits . For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) The following specific conditions apply to the project prior to recordation of the final map. Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.22.030: A copy of the proposed declaration of Covenants, Conddions, and Restrictions will apply and shall include an agreement for common area maintenance, including facilities and landscaping together with an estimate of the initial assessment fees anticipated for such maintenance, a description of a provision for maintenance of vehicular access areas within a protect, and an indication of appropriate responsibilities for maintenance of all utility lines and services for each unit, and, 2 A physical elements report which shall include, but not limited to a A report detailing the condition and estimating the remaining useful life of each element of the protect proposed for conversion fire protection systems including automatic sprinkler system, alarm systems, or standpipe systems and structural elements b A structural pest control report A licensed structural pest control operator pursuant to Section 8516 of the Business and Professions Code shall prepare such report Standard Conditions which apply to any new proposed structures after the recordation of the map. E. General Requirements Submit five complete sets of plans including the following. a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceding and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture unds, gas piping, and healing and an conditioning, and g Planning Department CUP Tracking Number must be clearly noted on the Title Sheet o the Plans - • h Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls. SG7-OS _ ~- ~ 3 -/-/- -/-/- Protect No SUBTTI'166 Comolehon Date F. G. i All sheets must be marked NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required pnor to plan check submittal -/-/- 3 Contractors must show proof of State and Ctty licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to -/-/- the Cdy pnor to permit issuance 4 Business shall not open for operation pnor to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the ~~- Building and Safety Department Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be -J-J- marked with the protect file number (i e., DRC2003-00072 and SUBTT17166) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Budding and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of bwlding permits for a new residential protect or mator addition, the applicant -/-~- shallpay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shalt provide a copy of the School Fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department pnor to permit issuance 3 The Building and Safety Official shall prowde the street addresses after tracUparcel map -/-/- recordation and prior to issuance of Bwldmg Permds. 4 Construction actively shall not occur between the hours of 8.00 p.m and 6:30 a m Monday -/-/- through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. . 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public -/-/- counter) New Structures 1. Prowde compliance with the California Bwldmg Code (CBC) for property line clearances -/-/- considering use, area, and fve-resistiveness. 2 The protect shall be designed to comply wdh the 2001 Calrfomia Bwldmg Codes (CBC), the California Fire Code and with RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39. 3 Prowde compliance with the California Budding Code for required occupancy separations. ~~- 4 Prowde draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC ~-~- Section 1505 5. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the regwred fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _J-l- 6. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. ~~- 7. Prowde the required restroom faaldies per the CBC Appendix Chapter 29. --J-1- _ 8 All exit components must comply with the requirements of CBC Chapter 10 (adtoining rooms, ~-~- rated corridors, door swings, separation of exits, etc.). . SG1-05 4 f3- 31 Project No SUBTT17166 Completion Date 9 At the time of tenant improvement plan check submdtal (for construction) additional requvements -/-/- may be regwred • 10 Clearly indjcate on the plans compliance with ADA regwrements for the disabled -/-/- 11 A regjster architect must sign and stamp the plans H. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with Califomia Building Code, City Grading -/-/- Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance wjth the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Califomia to _J-1- pertorm such work 3 A geologjcal report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submjtted at the -/-/- time of application for grading plan check 4 At the time of tenant improvement plan check submittal (for construction) additional requirements may be regwred 5 The final Grading Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, -/~- submitted, and approved by the Budding and Safety Official prior to the issuance of bwlding permits 6 A separate grading plan check submittal is requved for ail new construction projects and for existing bwldings where jmprovements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and sjgned by a California . registered Ciwl Engineer t be submitted for plan check and be approved t l ans mus p Not on title sheet that tenant improvemen prior to construction The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Bulding and Safety Department it you have any questions about the procedure at (909) 477-2710 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1 Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by -/~ deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved 2 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint ' -/~- s or maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map • SG1-05 5 ~-3a w.,~ . Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District --- Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS September 28, 2005 Crescent Business Center NEC Archibald & Business Center Dr SUBTT17166 THE FOLLOWING SPECIFIC CONDITIONS APPLY TO THE PROJECT PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP. Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.22.030 - A A copy of the proposed declaration of CC&R'S which will apply and which shall include an agreement for common area maintenance, including facilities and landscaping together with an estimate of the initial assessment fees anticipated for such maintenance; a description of a provision for maintenance of vehicular access areas within a project; and an indication of appropriate responsibilities for maintenance of all utility lines and services for each unit; and, B. A physical elements report; which shall include but not be limited to: • 1 A report detailing the condition and estimating the remaining useful life of each element of the protect proposed for conversion. fire protection systems including automatic sprinkler system, alarm systems, or standpipe systems; and structural elements 2 A structural pest control report A licensed structural pest control operator pursuant to Section 8516 of the Business and Professions Code shall prepare such report. These conditions exist unless otherwise noted in which case those conditions apply as noted. THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PARCEL MAP. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commerciaUindustnal protects is 300-feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the . _ public roadways ~~ u At intersections ui On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv As regwred by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District v A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any budding c. If any portion of a faality or bwlding is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or bwiding, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fue flow shall be provided d Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof. FSG2 Fire Flow 1. The regwred fire flow for this protect is 3,750 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 2 The regwred mirnmum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 2,000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch _ This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fue sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station momtonng This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to prowde the requred fire flow subiect to Fire District rewew and approval. Private fire hydrants on adiacent property shall not be used to prowde required fire flow 3 Fire protection water plans are regwred for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for rewew, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 Calrfornia Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in• 1. Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet. 2 ~---3~ 3 4 5 6. Group "A" Occupances "E" Occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more persons All structures that do not meet Fire Distract access regwrements (see Fire Access) When required fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure When the building access does not meet the requirements of the 2001 California Bwiding Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard #9-7 When any applicable code or standard regwres the structure to be sprinklered. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System The Califorrna Budding Code, the RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code require a listed fire sprinkler morntoring Central Station Fire Alarm system Plan check approval and a budding permit are regwred Prior to the installation of the fire alarm system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alann Standard #10-6. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire Distract access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fue Department Access Roadways Std #9-7. 1. Location of Access All portions of the structures 1't story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire Distract vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the bulding. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are. a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. b The maximum inside tum radius shall be 24-feet. c. The minimum outside tum radws shall be 50-feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). C J 3 /~-3~ ~ Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trammed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fue Department apparatus 3 Access Doorways. Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows a In buildings without high-pled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Bwiding Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards b In bwldings with high-pled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire Distract access to all required openings 4. Access Walkways• Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings 5. CommerciaUlndustrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fue Distract Standard #9-2 The following design requirements apply a Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fue Construction Services (FCS) for approval Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS • b Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. c Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the munmum clearance dimension of Brave access shall be 20 feet e Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fue Safety Office for $20.00. f Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second g The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be egwpped with a manual override device and afail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechansm in case of power failure or mecharncal malfunction. h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. - ~. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fue Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complewty of the various entry configurations • 4 ~~~ 6 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 7 Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan rewew FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction Plan check submittal is requred with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be regwred for any activity or operation not specifically descnbed below, which in the iudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property • Aerosol Products • Application of Flammable Finishes Operation • Automobile Wrecking Yards • Battery Systems • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Cellulose Nitrate • Compressed Gases • Cryogenics • Dry Cleaning Plants • Dust-Producing Processes and Operations • Explosive or Blasting Agents • Flammable and Combustible Liquids • Frwt Ripening Plants • Hazardous Materials Supported Structures • High-Pile Combustible Storage (HPS) • Liquefied Petroleum Gases • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings Magnesium Working Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Open Burning Organic Coating Ovens Powder Coating Public Assembly Pyrotechnical Special Effects Radioactive Materials Refngeration Systems Repair Garages Rubbish Handling Operations Spraying or Dipping Operations Tents, Canopies and/or Tire Storage Welding and Cutting Operations Wood ProductslLumber Yards FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino Air The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall rewew your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards. Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Matenals Division at (909) 387-4631-for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the CaVEPA-Certified Unified Program Agency (CLtPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ~3~ 1 If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Bwlding & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850.2 . prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure regwrements. A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be regwred if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility Any business that operates on rented or leased oropertv which is regwred to submit a Plan, is also requved to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subiect to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions. The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of bwldings and/or the installation of egwpment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Frre District "Application for Alternate Method° form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee FCS-14 Map Recordation RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are regwred on this protect The protect appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided A reaprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners. Reciprocal access agreement -Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and anon-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subiect property The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, budding or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. Reciprocal water covenant -Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems faalities in general) The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire Distract. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino Recorders Office. The Fve Construction Services Unit shall approve the agreement prior to recordation. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office. The Fire Construction Services Unit shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation ~-~8 FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: This condition applies if any additional structures are built on this site subsequent to the map recordation. Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities Distract #85-1 or #88-1 is regwred prior to the issuance of grading or bwlding permits for any proposed structures Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions Applicable to any proposed construction (Future addition or remodeling). PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems• The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for rewew and approval by the Fire Distract Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distract Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is regwred prior to any bwlding permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Bwlding & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services wdl perform plan checks and inspections 2 All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable praor to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fve construction Services wdl inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3. Public Water Supply (DomesticlFire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan • showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the rewew and approval by the Fire Distract and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radds of the protect Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. 4 All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable praor to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 5. Construction Access• The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6° above the finished surface of the road. 6. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services 7 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements• All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino 7 ~-3~ PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The bwlding construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2 Private Fire Hydrants• For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants The underground fue line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the Califorrna Fire Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring• Prior to the issuance of a Certficate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service 6. Fire Alarm System• Prior to the issuance of a Certficate of Occupancy, the fve alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7 Access Control Gates. Prior to the issuance of a Certrficate of Occupancy, vehicular . gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance v~nth RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certficate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services 9. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specrfy the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all regwred fire access roadways. 10. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certficate of Occupancy, commeraal~ndustnal and multi-family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting wsible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness background , When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non- illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance. _ f3 ~--~D Larger address numbers will be regwred on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks inmulti-tenant commeraal and industrial buildings The swte designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all swtes 11 Hazardous Materials Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Matenals/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services 12. Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire Distract use in the event of an emergency at the subiect bwlding or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 13 Mapping Site Plan• Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'/z" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be rewsed by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and budding features as regwred in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector ~ `T' T H E C I T Y O F R A N G tl O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE: January 25, 2006 TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM• Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner BY Rozalynne Thompson, Contract Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16867 - ETCO DEVELOPMENT, INC - A request to subdivide 8.9 gross acres of land into 12 residential lots in the Very Low Residential District (.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of the I-210 Freeway and on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0225-171-19. Related File Variance DRC2004-01285. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration This item was continued from January 11, 2006. VARIANCE DRC2004-01285 - ETCO DEVELOPMENT, INC. -Requests to reduce the minimum depth of Lot 10 from 200 feet to 180 feet to allow Lot 11 to have frontage along Etiwanda Avenue and to allow Lot 12 to also have frontage along Etiwanda Avenue and a reduced minimum width from 90 feet to 75 feet in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of the I-210 Freeway - APN• 0225-171-19. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTTi6867 This item was continued from January 11, 2006 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Project Density. Zone range - .1 to 2 units per gross acre; proposed density is 1 33 and per gross acre. B Surrounding Land Use and Zomno North -Single-Family Residential, Developed, Very Low Residential South - I-210 Freeway East - Etiwanda Avenue, Public Right-of-Way West -Single-Family Residential, Developed, Very Low Residential . Items B & C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16867 AND DRC2004-01285 - ETCO DEVELOPMENT, INC January 25, 2006 Page 2 • C. General Plan Desicnations• Protect Site -Very Low Residential North -Very Low Residential South -Public Pastilles, Right-of-Way East -Public Pastilles, Right-of-Way West -Very Low Residential D. Site Characteristics: The protect site is a remnant parcel left over from the construction of the I-210 Freeway. The subject property is vacant, zoned Very Low Residential, and within the boundaries of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. There is no sigmficant vegetation on-site E Backoround On June 6, 2005, the Planning Commission conducted aPre-Application Review workshop for the Tentative Tract Map, Variance, and Development Review application (DRC2004-00667). The Planning Commissioners reviewed and commented on two subdivision alternatives. The first proposed 12 lots with homes fronting onto Vintage Drive. The second layout proposed cut-de-sacs as recommended by the Traffic Engineer. After review and discussion, the Planning Commissioners agreed that the first layout was the preferred one, provided that the developer considered the unique characteristics of Lot 12. Since the Planning Commission workshop, the applicant has withdrawn the development review application (DRC2004-00667), therefore, no homes are proposed at this time • ANALYSIS A General• The properties to the north, east, and west are developed with single-family residences and are approximately 20,000 to 25,000 square feet in lot area. All properties surrounding the subject site are zoned Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan The protect site is generally rectangular in shape with approximate dimensions of 1,120 feet easUwest by 350 feet north/south with an overall area of about 392,000 square feet. The existing topography slopes from about 1,457 feet on the north side of the lot to about 1,448 feet on the south side. Development of the site will connect Vintage Drive eastward to Etiwanda Avenue. No homes are proposed at this time. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the protect on December 6, 2005. The Committee (Fletcher, McPhail, Coleman) reviewed the protect and recommended approval. C. Grading Review Committee• The Grading Review Committee reviewed the protect on December 6, 2005, and recommended approval. D Technical Review Committee: The Committee reviewed the protect and recommended approval subtect to the conditions outlined in the attached Draft Resolution of Approval. E Environmental Assessment: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study. Staff completed Part II of the Initial Study in consultation with outside sources and found that • there could be significant adverse environmental impacts on short-term au quality dunng the site preparation Grading and egwpment exhaust would cause such impacts. Mitigation measures will be regwred to reduce the_ short-term air quality impact to a ~ ~~ a - PLANNING COMMISSION S ~ AFF REPORT SUBTT16867 AND DRC2004-01285 - ETCO DEVELOPMENT, INC. January 25, 2006 • Page 3 less-than-significant level. A noise study was also prepared to evaluate the impact of the I-210 Freeway traffic noise on the proposed residential lots. The study concluded sound attenuation walls would reduce noise to acceptable levels. F. Variances: The applicant proposes Variances for lot dimensions and the height of sound walls. Lot Width and Lot Depth The required alignment of Vintage Drive with Arapaho Road necessitates this Variance request. All lots wdl have frontage along the proposed Vintage Drive extension except for Lots 11 and 12, which will front Etiwanda Avenue. The proposal includes Variance requests for lot depth and lot width. The depth for proposed Lot 10 wdl be 180 feet, the proposed width for Lot 12 wrfl be 75 feet The minimum lot depth for the Very Low Residential zone is 200 feet and the minimum lot width is 90 feet. Lot depths are calculated by using the center points of converging lines and the lot depth dimension for these lots are surpassed along the north side of each lot Sound Wall Heiaht• The applicant requests a Variance to allow sound wall heights up to 14 feet. Given that the I-210 Freeway abuts the property to the south, the protect site is subject to traffic noise levels that exceed the City's standards. The acoustical analysis concludes that 14-foot sound attenuation walls and acoustic upgrades in the prospective homes are necessary to reduce noise to acceptable levels. This is consistent with other freeway sound walls in the area. • The purpose of a Variance is to provide flexibility from the strict application of development standards, however, the Planning Commission must make the following findings in order to approve the request The following are facts to support these findings: Variance findings for Lot Widths and Lot Depths: Finding 1 That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the obfectives of the Development Code. FacUs: The strict application of the Ordinance would result in a practical difficulty because development on Lots 10, 11, and 12 would be prohibited since the dimensions wrfl be less than those required under the Etiwanda Speafic Plan. Finding 2• That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conddions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same distract. FacUs• Per Traffic Engineering regwrements, the proposed Vintage Drive extension must align with Arapaho Road As a result of the regwred alignment, three lots, Lots 10, 11, and 12, will be created with dimensions that do not meet the minimum of the Etiwanda Specrfic Plan - . Finding 3. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprave the applicant of - pnvdeges enfoyed by the owners of other _ properties in the same distract ~~C3 PLANNING COMMISSION S'I AFF REPORT SUBTT16867 AND DRC2004-01285 - ETCO DEVELOPMENT, INC. January 25, 2006 Page 4 • FacVs Without the Variance, the project would be depnved of privileges enjoyed by other owners within the same distract to develop single-family residences. Findino 4 That the granting of the Vanance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties or improvements in the viamty. FacVs This development is unique because the property is a remnant parcel of excess right-of-way, left over after construction of the I-210 Freeway, and Vintage Drive is one of the few streets in surrounding developments that will align with an opposing street (Arapaho Road). The Vintage Drive alignment with Arapaho Road creates three lots with nonconforming dimensions. Since this is a urnque condition in this area, granting the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties. Finding 5• That the granting of the Vanance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially in~unous to properties or improvements in the vicinity FacVs: Granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or be materially in~unous to properties or improvements in the vicinity because Lots 10, 11, and 12 will be developed according to City standards, which address issues of public health, safety, and welfare. . Vanance findinos for sound wall height Findino 1 That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the speafied regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the obfectives of the Development Code. FacVs: To comply with the City's noise level standards, the applicant has requested sound attenuation wall height of up to 14 feet to reduce traffic noise. Variances for similar wall heights were granted previously for surrounding tracts Findino 2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same distract FacVs: The protect site is unusual because it is adfacent approximately 70 feet north of the I-210 Freeway. There are already sound walls up to 16 feet high along the I-210 Freeway Finding 3: That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprave the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district FacVs Without the Vanance, the protect would be depnved of privileges enfoyed by • other owners within the same district to develop single-family residences. Construction of sound attenuation walls is necessary to protect the future ~~~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16867 AND DRC2004-01285 - ETCO DEVELOPMENT, INC January 25, 2006 Page 5 residences from excessive traffic noise levels The proposed wall heights are consistent with those on surrounding properties for which the Planning Commission has granted Variances. Finding 4: That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties or improvements in the vicinity. FacUs Because the project site is adjacent to a mayor noise source, and that similar Variances have been granted in the wcinity, the proposed project will be in the spent of other Variances approved in the area. Findino 5• That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the wcinity FacUs Granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or be materially in~unous to properties or improvements in the vicinity On the contrary, granting of the Variance will reduce noise levels to levels consistent with City standards and will prevent exposure of residents to excessive noise levels. CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the protect site The Variance was re-advertised to include the wall height RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 and Variance DRC2004-0128~through adoption of the attached Resolutions with conditions, and ~~~~ ianra-nf.a Mdiaated p eoative Declaration. Acting City Planner DC•RTUna Attachments. Exhibit A -Site Location Map Exhibit B -Site Utilization Map Exhibit C -Site Plan -- Exhibit D -Tentative Tract Map No. 16867 Exhibit E -Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit F - Letter of JusbficafJOn for Variance from Applicant dated December 21, 2004 Exhibit G -Pre-Application Rewew Workshop Minutes-dated June 8, 2005 Exhibit H -Design Rewew Committee Action Comments dated December 6, 2005 Exhibit I -Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2004-01285 Yv ~C 5 - ~4 ryv /~. ~a F.. ~.~~ .'~v~ ETIWAf}IpA enw~non PROJECT S A„ ~~~ I p I J EXHIBIT A (RoPO~~,~lp ~ / FONTANA di/L~ wf~St~1 i i -~.,' ~ ~- -- ~„ ~ ,_ , s IS ~ '/l~; °~ ~ s I s ` `V '~. 3 _ ~~ 4 ~ 1- R ~~--~--'--F~-r- -J ~-~~~ ~ ~- ~- ~- ~ _ ~, ~_ . ;,~ ~ .~..,. w~.; -~ r .i,-I i I~+~,,~-- ~I- 1 1 r~ ~; P , ~• `~ ' ~ - \-~a~'-_r _ 1~~- 3i ~- ~ .L__J ~._ .~ ~ _ ,n r:.~ ..~,. a'I IEi E ¢< ~~~: i; d 0 E ar t i SF ~~~ 5 @9 ~a, 3 ~ 3 ~: jar ~ ~;1 _ ~~ ~~ -^~ ,o ~- --J Z ~-- - ~ s ~ I ~.~~ INN711 ICn~113 II -I ~ _ % - _-_- ~_ a ~ _ 1 ~- I- i f ~ 6r - "" "° v4o -1 ~~I`_~~» 1 - 1 - ~~ti ~ - - ~ ~ \ ~~~~-~ _1 ___ -_ ~• EXHIBIT B ~I a~ ^^~ ~~L IICI ~~~~ ,~N f€ -_ -___ ~__ ~ ~~ ---r -~- ; ~ - -- - i I ~ I 'i~-- ~ ~ _ I J~ _ . i _ ~-, .~,~ s ~ _~ I~ 1 • I ~ ~r w ' ' -' i _ i F ~-_ ` ~ --;~~ ~" ~ '~I 7I i ~ __ ~ ' 1 art- - { t ;'~ _~ I I_ +~ y y l ,~ ,~, p M 9 ~~ "L ;~ , _ . . I--~ ~I I , _ _ wa I ~ - ~~ i r -"1 ~ Yf I I 1 i ~ ~ ~f , Ilm --- I ~ / ) `. ` --~ _ - +o ~ _ ~ I i L __I ~ 1 ~~c ~ h a~ b ~b~ ~' k ao;e , ~2o\`a Q Uin~. N ~' Q ~ W =W~oh ~~C `, Wti~ ~ ~~_ S N ~'il~i ,.Y,~,~ _ ~~ i e 1 ''° Q ~o~ J ~ + Z 1 ~ 6 e F', ' Q Ubl/1"'0 { Irv ! j "~ ~Il~a~-~ ~ 'i F{ J QQO i a Y . ~ {d{~ ~~ 0~ Vim" C ei d ~ ~tO~i~_ r~ !{i ° ~E ~i A, E ~~b~ow a ~ m I~~@ ~5 1~ ~ O b 'S k' ~ 1 1t / 9 ts~ i f\~. O h o ° q fi kC :ge ° V! Q 2 V w i i .--,.e.. o i EBgO/!6T sw I ~ _.^.~ 141'~I I ~~ tfltC i' ~ v z - { E ~ ntert i e \ rd/l~vttt i~ d`a ipa ~a ti C -~--N 3A~4-_ _ ~ ~~ _.,Ii[m. I V t c 'L ~ I 4, P , ! IIj '~nikaDR,l~t .. 2yy _',:-~ ~~ I ~c~ t _ n ~ ~i ~I Y ~ ~ ~ g,~e - _L _ ~' _ o ' I, p o P ~;I, ~ ; I; I -L ~ ' ~I ~ ~1 z z~ __, _; ~~ ; l ;, I i ~. d 4 U 2 7 11 i Y d 9~ t~{ r~g e ~e C 1 ~1 ~ ~ __ '1 I ! 01 n Pig ~ a{GE~C9iilra'{7i~i 4 J I~U ~ e W U i_ I = ___ ~ Iq I I i W t•~~ ~A ~ apa ~iF ~' I ~ I, ~~ rv ~ I . ' ~. f 1 ~Pt P ~c[ taE' ~3~j Q _2 ~'1 _ _ I ~ 4\I~ ~~~ ill ~ 1,3) 'Cs §e aalt ~il~ G~6 li iY 3 f [ ii ~ I ~~ I ~~~ a. I !~S' r. f !~ a ~~ ~a . ~p ~' ~ d @ F=~tl. 2 ~ - ~ ,i'' ~ I II - )j 1, ~S i 9@a 5:~ s: ~@S: ~4~3 IC~d W p _ r ny i-' a_B ;~i r R h~ ' I I is V V I I e I~ TZ II I i I i • I • ~1' -' ~ a _ I f ~ a = ;, ~i ~ F, Z ~t ~ I { e Y x y li ~ ~ 1~ ~} i I I x y I. w / r q B I~ w t~ 41 1 .~- ~ J.I a 4 ~ f"'' ~ I~ [i ~',~ ~ I ~ 5g p° I ~ I1 k-+.°... t o It C@ r r~ 1 r ' a !~ ~ i~ ____ _J' ~ ~ g ~ --- ~ ,--- $lEysil~ili ~t1;i ~ s~N Sjtal,~ X111 ! '~ I~I:1 r o r rr r r rr.o o t•t•E ? ILIA, ~e~ ~;113 F't F9lQgt F Ft4t4t !a F ~rp~tBq! /~ "~~ ~;;1 ii, ~I ~.i'v?o ~ ~ Nd i'~d'ti~~ CS i~ ~1 E E9 {~ e~ E Ct ES 4'1 ti !i t91 t~ !i 11 '~~~I'~ I ~ ~-Lr !11~ ~~~~y bbb~bb~r~b ebb bbd ! n1 3 , EE ti E\ m aS _ • ~ i i ~ ~ ~ 11 m~ ~~ E. S U Eo N ! 4. i~ 111 ! ~~ ~~"~~ ~ ei ~ ii ~b M ~~~ jai ~; s ('' ~"~~ • E E ;1°E EEEE ~2 g ao ° ~ ti O '.. i ___.~ ! '~ 'a~ 11 Q O ~ ~,~ ~ i ° i ! ~ I ~ ~,~ ~~ E1 `sEa ~ a 111! -,~~ ~ __ .-_ --~~_-~-- - '~, TL e 1~ ' a.~t ~ , ill l l I is S `~ ~ ~ I ~ ,. r e e q ~ ``"- _ ~ l` ~ ~~ illl SEE I ~ ~ ~ • -_ ' a ,~ ; ' ' :4~E /l I! ~ iiE dlf, lg' ~ y aia ~ o 22 ~ Z O ' - ' G ~~eQ~•~. ~E ~- "CS ! ~ ~_ i ~ ~ ~I ~ 1 f° E im ` _ N ~, l g` {~ • U 2 `~_- ~' ~ 1°'~~~ ''IiII' ~ILEPE~F~I~Ita-f'°~ Q Et t ~ ~ ~ ~ ( r'+ i ii ~ [ 1 ~ i ilI i~ ~ i Se E Q ~. I ,, QQQ ..... ... ~ O ~ --~ 1 I ~~ li 1! ~ ff ° 5 m -~ ~ ~` ~' (' 4 ' ~ ! 1 I 1 ~ W 1~1~ 1!! 1€ all t~1 i' ~ ~ ~ ` , ` ~ ` ' f,. h ~ E ~I' ~ ~ ~ 6!'t iai 4a ,~a g~~ t I 1 I` 2 ~,_ ~, I ~ 0.0 ~I ~ ~ _ j9~~ ~~6 °! '~' !~ , /' Q ~ ~ ~ ~-~ ~ ~ 'i ~ ~ saEl ref s~ 8~1: 8.lI Z _~ -~ t ff ~ ~ i l E ~~ ~ '~ E i ~ p p ~ t~ S~ ~ E , ~ ~ a ~E~' ' E ~ ~ E 1 ! z 1 . ~~ ~ , \ ' ~~ I '' ~ij ~ cy f E E 1 E E° _ €€ EE E E, E! E ~~ E~~'~~~~~~ I - ~ ~ $ 1 ~°r I III ~I1 1 i ° 1° EE tv 1 E1 1 E E El p E• iIi E E E ~ ' aE ,~ F 1,111 II ~ I ~ ~ lu !1 a1 a1 a a! a~ a~ a a11f °1 f! .y ,1,~ 1~ ,f ~"3.at;iii~t~l~t 4`'~,~' ii e~111~~~e1E~1j111i~1ete(1111~ r~fli~lE~l ~ ~;1! ~~ ~,' q bbbd~,bbbbbbb bbb bb „, ,. , v~ !D 1133N5 S t0/6Z/10 31Y0 Z Y9NOWYJ09 ON~NYU JO At IJ 3H! NI ~9e9illans t99oo-roozoaa ws ws ,ww ~,.~nn,,,, usernU dV{'V l.~t/'Jl 3/1 /1d1N31 °T1'st"awysar,"~o~ca Nd7d ~N/Od~l9 1d/11d3~N0~ ^ - ~- e . yrw I ~~ arn+ n 5 er ~8 re[e .e rant n. muv¢~.nl wn....Reuw aran~ ~~~ n. w~~ w'G%[L -rte. aa. w u. su. ~ n..r r /~ OJSTf 4 W [K [6f1 ~.U biY~ nB ~~ t~W[[ -1~9 .^tl 3/iN11Y, ~ OTA'NpNI -- __ .,__,. --ww Wei _ - _- 1 ~' ~ ~ I p Q n ~ !u~ ~r,x33a~ o~z i ~ R~ _ _ _ _ _ _ '., anx vxmo -@ r~~ .~.yy~~~,_ . __ _'-__-"_- "_..»r:5_. - ~_ 5~ .ewsy'..~~NYt'aLl:yTe.w...a ~r r•x...Q l~9 nll ,l ~~~ ~II~ ~~-07~ 711YdYtlY h C i 3 --~ fix,.. c .. t ....,, .._....,! t -- . _.._. 4. --~! •aarmn r .. -'~-fl n u m~ s e rani r:r°1u'o° --~i .m.a.m..;:.d..a : ~-0 •~.r~a-r»~-~ .a....~....anr _~,.._.,,~-a r~.ura~~un~rws im~ .®.m r u wunaene~ s ma nv-~w asmsaruuur nwb.raa~a~ r -p rnre.cwxaunraw. s. -{]i ~•ur.uar r~ ons'wmra ~~W-0 •ur.v.~wa.uan~wa y-0t l.r rLJJ'S'-"y--'~D'-'Yl-Ifl ~.= $~...~_. .. ,,yy« ~:-~ ~ 1u ©u -~ ./ _ `y `L. _ __ .( ~A~ ~ _ _ __ __ ____ _ ~~.jiy . _ ' /,/. ~. W. revr\„ ^' nr a...y, `,,,,-r'. 0.', `~ ..:i_: ;~_ p', m ~ _l" ~'rn~ ~ s': "v;,~.; i..yM U r;` BM ii.~L..S% ^ %. ,~' Lq,,{'' G. L I::r~' ~,K i.~/\ry~ ~ .~ O Y1 rri •~'=Tt~ _T____ a ; . 0" a I ., ~ _'T" - _ ..T.` , , '1 Y' ~T'. ...~"_' ._ ~.rn~, 4~..t .« ~ _ _ ...:er. . jl i ,i'~ •Ir _`cl r~~ 1 -~ 1 -'Y.~F~I_,I-_°-- .--1., nom:, _.~- _7Y.'..~- I i _ ror ; I - _.._ I' ~'r. I ..rn, -a'r ~ I n"m:aw ~ - ~i ~~ 1 ~ I ',I ~~ I I I II ~ ~ I I ~ ~~' 1 _ I 'I : ~ ~ _ ~ E I _ I - i' I ~ __ i=1' i t 1 V9NOWY~/1~ OH~NVb !0 Ally 3HL NI L9891 ON lOb'!~1 3~/lb'1N31 Nt/~d JN/Obl~J 7b'n1d3~N0~ I ~ ( ~ 6' ~1 ~ ~ n~~ ~'rn I,u rLs ! ; ,, 1~_..n~,e___ L~ BRIO - .' -_ ~ ~ MNE~~- r ,i>_. ~` ( 741ryr A 111'L',`OO 4 - T I~ I ~i~i s- I ,,, +~'~ I n~` I bar ` X Z 30 Z 133N5 YO/6Z/YO 3[YO b'JNOYIY~N~ 014~NYtl !0 A/ lJ 3111 NI L9891118n5 3' L9900-600Z~rY0 L9891 'ON d 7'{N 10 t12l1 3~117'1N31 Nd1d 9N/Od~lO 1bOld30N00 _ --- ~o~ - ~s -, aa,e . .;~ yl ~ ~,....mo...~ ~ _r~_ _ ....e,.~.,.~ L ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ _ w~a ~ wmv yIy' la 'O n m. 4 - ~;«~ -- ~S wr i+ey vn rsuw revel .n w,.r. J77 'S.LN3W153NN1 OOJ,3 ~W'0/m"~OF10016 -- ~k[xpt ,.. .--~ _-E r rW~ _u_=~_- --re- ..~m~~ -L1.7lY9,. a.,,. lum ~ ~ ns ~ av~~ 1 -gar®a - urw _- sm __ .- a• L~1 .sP"~, _ __~ .: amp _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ ~ _1 .r~Y'i' i ~~ ~°~E ~ ;Mm nr~xe ~ ~ tlm Y __ - ~ i uuw o¢ ~ d E r~~aa ~ i ~_ ^Awnr rovrur. _ ~I ~LC~ o/ V V % ~ lJ~ r aX U ! v CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEC 21 2004 RECENED -PLANNING December 21, 2004 Plamm~g Drvrs~on City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re SLTBTT16867 & DRC2004-00667 Deaz Srr or Madam: Please accept this correspondence as a request for a vanance for the referenced project This site rs a remainder pazcel that was created by construction of the 210 freeway. The parcel rs long (east/west drrechon) and narrow and ~s required to provide aneast/west collector street w~thm its boundanes. This proposed street will align/jom with existing streets This s~tuahon lends to the creation of a few lots that are unable to follow the exact City design cntena. With that understanding please consider for approval the following dev~ahons from the Ehwanda Specific Plan• 1.) Lot 12 a.) Frontage of the lot rs along Ehwanda Avenue with access from dnveway on Vintage Dnve b.) Reduce the mmunum width of the lot from 90 feet to 75 feet. c.) Reduce the mimmum side-yazd setback along Vintage Dnve from 25 feet to 20 feet 2.) Lot 11 a) Frontage of the lot is along Ehwanda Avenue with access from dnveway on Vintage Dnve. 3.) Lot 10 a.) Reduce minimum depth of lot from 200 feet to 180 feet Please note that the above lots incorporate all of the remaining bask development standards as stated within the Etiwanda Specrfic Plan. Sincerely Steve Schapel Drrector of Land Development EXHIBIT F ,~ ~cia- ]351 Pomona Road, Suite 210 Corona, CA 92882 Phone: 951-479-3000 Fax: 951-47'9-3020 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA . PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Adtoumed Meetmg ' June 8, 2005 Cha~nnan Mauas called the Adtoumed Meetmg of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7.15 p.m. The meeting was held in the Rams Room at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Richard Fletcher, Rich Maclas, Larry McNiel, Cnstine McPhail, Pam Stewart ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller, City Planner, Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, Michael Diaz, Senior Planner, Joe Stofa, Assouate Engineer, Rozalynne Thompson, Contract Planner •fflf NEW BUSINESS A PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2005-00448 - ETCO DEVELOPMENT - A proposed subdivision of 8.90 acres of land into up to 12 lots in the Very Low Residential District, located at the northwest comer of Etrvvanda Avenue and I-210 Freeway - APN: 0225-171-19. Brad Buller, City Planner, introduced the item and gave an overview of the Pre-Application Review process. He emphasized that the purpose of the workshop was to rewew the proposed subdivision's layout and Ks relationship to the surrounding area He stated that the parcel before the Commissioners was one of the City's remnant parcels bounded by the 210 freeway to the south, single-family developments to the west and north, and Etiwanda Avenue to the east. He then added that the applicant submitted two proposals for the Commissioners to consider. He commented the first proposed 12 lots, all of which would have dared access to Vintage Dnve; and the second layout addressed the Traffic Engineer's request to eliminate dared access on Vintage Avenue by proposing cut-de-sacs. He conGuded by stating that the primary issue about the subdivision is that of safety because Vintage Drive is designed to be a busy collector street in the City. Steve Schapel, representing Etco Investments, described the two layouts. He stated that Etco Investments and the owner favored the first design because ft allows a greater number of lots. He agreed with Mr. Buller that the second design was in response to traffic comments. Mr. Schapel then presented an alternative to both proposals. In an altematrve layout, he proposed shared access drives for every two lots. Rozalynne Thompson, Contrail Planner, gave a brief overview of the project. She stated that the key issue is whether a perfect soluUOn for the layout of the parcels is obtainable. She then stated that after considering the key City's development standards, including traffic circulation, staff prefers the original proposal rather than the recently submitted one. Ms. Thompson believed that the first proposal is more favorable from a livability and long-tens maintenance standpoint because the home . pads have greater setbacks from the 210 freeway and Vintage Drive, there are fewer potential deep street side yard landscape areas that are difficult-to maintain, and horse corrals will meet the minimum setback of 70 feet. She acknowledged the second proposal is more favorable from a traffic circulation standpoint, however, she noted that Lots 3, 5, and 8 of the this proposal would not have EXHIBITC~ ~~`3 _ direct access to the local trail located to the south of the existing parcel. Finally, she added that there might be an issue as to whether the horse corrals, especially the one on Lot 9, could comply . with the minimum 70-foot setback. Mr Buller stated that there were additional issues for the Commission to consider inducting the issue of the maintenance of the local trail on the north side of Vintage Dnve He said they should also consider the layout of the lots Huth frontage along Etnrvanda Avenue because the garages of those residences should be directed away from Etrvvanda Avenue Finally, Mr Buller recommended that an attractive, single-story home should be developed on lot 12 (lot 11 in the second layout). He then concluded the overview and fumed the discussion over to the Planning Commission Commissioner Stewart preferred the first layout to the second. However, she doubted that Lot 12 of Exhibit I would be viable because she feared a lot of such a configuration and size could become unsightly. FuAhernore, she cautioned that off-street parlung must be heavily regulated and available to guests. She suggested driveways with an attractive and user-fnendly hammerhead design might worts. Commissioner McNiel thought that the first layout is a supenor plan He anticipated that traffic traveling through Vintage Drive would be lighter than surrounding streets Although he would prefer guest parking, he concurred with Commissioner Stewart's recommendation of access dnveways with hammefieads. He stated that Lot 12 of Exhibit I presents the same problem as other lots with dual frontages. Commissioner McPhail agreed Huth both Commissioners Stewart and McNiel She stated that she would like to see Lot 12 of Exhibit I as a pocket park for the community Commissioner Fletcher commented he preferred the first layout because it meets more Development • Code regwrements, especially relating to trails He recommended that the two homes on Lots 11 and 12 either front Etiwanda Avenue or be designed so that the sides of the houses look like an additional front of the home. He added that the driveways must provide as much off-street parking and decorative paving on the site as possible and that Lots 11 and 12 need to be designed as upscale as possible. Chairman Macias agreed with all the comments made by the other Commissioners. He concurred with the other Commissioners that something unique must be done on Lot 12 of ExhibR I. Mr. Buller concluded that the consensus of the Commissioners was that they would support the first layout of the subdivision, provided that the developer considers the unique characteristics of Lot 12 of Exhibd I and ske and design the residence accordingN •w~~• B architectutral des gns for 310 condom n u2ms on 8 32ecres (9 oss) atlt a southeast comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Church Street within the Victona Gardens Master Plan - APN: 0207-1618. Attending the meeting were Steve Wesson from Forest City and Joe Stucker and John Young from the Lewis Operating Corporation. City Planner Buller opened the meeting and gave a general overview of the architectural guidelines and direction for the area. He mulled the representatives for Shea Homes to present their design concepts for the architecture of the new units. .` _2 ~~ ~L~ June 8, 2005 PC Adjourned Minutes • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8.10 p m Rozalynne Thompson December 6, 2005 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16867 - ETCO INVESTMENTS -The proposed subdivision of 8 9 acres of land into 12 residential lots m the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of the I-210 Freeway -APN: 0225-171-19. Related Files. Development Rewew DRC2004-00667 and Variance DRC2004-01285. VARIANCE DRC2004-01285 - ETCO INVESTMENTS - A request to reduce regwred lot width and lot depth related to the subdivision of 12 single-family residential homes on 8 9 acres of land m the Very Low Residential Distract (1-2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of the I-210 Freeway -APN 0225-171-19. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-00667 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867. Desion Parameters The protect site is arectangular-shaped parcel that is located immediatelywest of Etiwanda Avenue and north of the 210 freeway. The subtect property is vacant, zoned Very Low Residential, and within the boundaries of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan There is no significant vegetation on-site. Existmgsingle-family residential developments surround the site from the north (Carnage Estates II), east, and west (Carriage Estates I) and the 210 Freeway is directly south of the site This protect is a subdivision of 8.9 acres into 12 single-family residential lots. All lots will have frontage along the proposed Vintage Drive extension except for Lots 11 and 12, which will front Etiwanda Avenue The proposal includes variance requests for lot depth and lot width The depth for proposed Lot 10 will be 180 feet and the proposed width for Lot 12 will be 75 feet. The minimum lot depth for the Very Low Residential zone is 200 feet and the minimum lot depth is 90 feet. The required alignment of Vintage Drive with Arapaho Road necessitates the variance requests The resulting lots retain suffiaent buildable area to allow reasonable development that will not compromise the intention of the zone Lot depths are calculated by using the center points of converging Imes and the lot depth dimension for these lots are surpassed along the north side of each lot Potential noise impacts from Interstate 210 freeway have been addressed m the CEQA documents. The studies have concluded that sound levels, produced primarily by traffic on the 210 freeway, will exceed allowable thresholds. To reduce noise to less-than-significant levels, it has been recommended that 14-foot high sound barrier should be constructed along the southern property line of the protect site at the time homes are built. Wall heights exceeding 8 feet will regwre approval of a Variance application. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues. The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect• • 1 According to the General Plan, the protect is within the Highway 65dba zone The noise attenuation st~u,,d/y for this protect showed that substantial noise from the freeway would need to ~XN~g/T / / l~ ~cl~ DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTT16867 AND DRC2004-01285 - ETCO INVESTMENTS December 6, 2005 Page 2 be mitigated by installing a 14-foot sound wall along the southern property Ime. A Variance is regwred for walls over 8 feet m height The wall design shall match those constructed by Caltrans to the west and east Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee recommend approval of the proposed tentative tract map. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Fletcher, McPhail, Coleman Staff Planner Rozalynne Thompson The Committee recommended approval of the protect as presented i 1~ ~~~v City of Rancfa Cutarronpa Plaruvng Dnislon (809)477.2160 ~~ GENERAL MFORMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) (Please type or print clearly using Ink Use the tab key to move hom one line to the next Ilne.) INCOMPLETEAPPLICATIONSWlLL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that Rls the responsiblldyof the applicant roensure thffi the appbcabon is complete at the bme of submittal, City ateH will not be available to perlonn work required to provide mtssing mlormatlon 00 - OD(oL'o App6cabon Number for the project to which this loan pertains: ~Q~°~~~ g~ ~ _ Protect T7tle~ \J'fc "lY~~/,'L'~ t~ ~ l.Q AJ ~ 1 Name & Address of project owner(s): ~J1~4`i~ of ~`L- Lt=°«~'~H ~-~ ~ -0~3 Q~~F',-~De2 QahO ~ Name 8 Address o/ developer or pro/ect sponsor ETC.A ~~J ~~~~~ ~~~ ~35i ~oK~A ~~ ~ ago Study Pert1 docPage ~ ~ ~' / ~a r .+r Rev Bn Contact Person & Address Sr~c SC 1-{~E` L7 l~ R ~, ~~i-~ Name & Address o(person preparing this torn (d different tram above) 210 _ 4~! 9- 3~~ Q1~Z In/ormation indicated by an asterisk () rs not required of non-construcBon CUP's unless othenvlse requested by stall 'i) Provide a toll scale (8-t/2 x 11) copy o/the USGS Ouadrent Sheet(s) which Includes the pro/act site, and Indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site Irom the north, south, east and west, views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site, and representative wows of significant features from the site. Include a map shawmg location of each photograph. 3) Protect Location (describe). ~ ~~~~-r 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet r/necessary)' ~ ~ 0 ~~ ~!' ' ~~ ~ ~ ~ 5) Gross Slte Area (adsq. ft) ~. •6) Net Slte Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedfcations) o ~,~~ SF 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the pro/act site (attach add~bonal sheet !t necessary) eJ / A I ~PLANNING~FINAL\FORMS\COUNTERUnitlel Study Part? docPage Rev 5/3proa Telephone Number. 8) Include a description o(all peg„uts which will be necessary from the Cary o! Rancho Cucamonga and othergovemmental agencies rn order to fully implement the pro/ect SJ~i~tJ\St~a t~trk-~ ~Z~,ot1Q/~RoN ~;~~,tN EYly~ tTS ~ t N ~'('(t.FbT z(L µ C'6 9) Describe the physical setting o/the site as rt exists before the pro/ect includmg information on topography, soil stabrliry, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site (includmg age and condition) and the use of the structures Attach photographs ofsignificant features descn6ed In addition, cite all sources o(in/ormahon (i e., geological and/orhydrologrc studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traltic studies)• '~~~ ~i1'Cfc 15 ~t Q.<y['y~1.1(r1V~t42 Of1'(LC~c\- OF ~'~~ ..-.i__, i, _n~c cam.,-~rvtzYt~.c VtR 51~E76`C ~~~.J -i~`"~P~~ 10) Describe the known cultural and/orhistoncal aspects of the site. Cite all sources o(rn(orma6on (books, published reports and oral history). aA-~~ /14;~ ` 1 Rev 6/d0/03 I \PLANNING\FINAL~ORMS\COUNTERVni~al Study Pant docPape " -~~ g t-c~ LS V Rc Ar.1T -~ D C~J ene7 ~..~, t'(li w~~5. ~j '~ ~jpeN•! ~ f OJAI.~ 4 NOI 12) Describe the proposed pro/ect in detail This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms o/ultimate use that will result from the proposed pro/ect Indicate i/ there are proposed phases /ar development, the extent of development to occur wdh each phase, and the anticipated completion o/each increment. Attach adddional sheet(s)!/ necessary: . ~.. At ../f X11.. ~ riT .c .e -+.. sG7 J. t ~ ., A~ 170ETTi')A L. S~rSp-JiStoN -+.ro 'L'£ c.o~ ~ yu~cTE'~ AS oNc' ~ 1'M1S8. -,-,~ , .~~nAL ~ s ~An1T e. ~ D~~ -rv P/E c-eNC Q~.c{-~ w ~'M-~ i ~~~ OF P~~jooT 3800 5 F. cHJ 2orpeo SF MIN r-PI'S. on,o~e-x ,s ga~Nh~ eN -tom wt-5c /us~Gflf ~ E-t~sT fay ~., ` ~1 ~ 11 t N'f~49 E ~-~ -~-o ~'T' 1 w 1"v~f]' /}/e. ~c~o~0 ~wnl~ IS {}~1-flctQA't~^~1 -tom ~,~ cis-rrW~ ANA a- 13) Descnbe the surrounding properties, including in/ormabon on plants and animals end any cultural, histortcal, or scenic aspects Indicate the type o/ land use (residential, commercial, etc ), intensity o/ land use (one-/am/ty, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) end scale o/development (height, !rootage, setback, rear yard, etc ): 'm'° s.= ~1r ci ~ '~ .,..~ ~ ~ ~-on+Nc't-T -T~ M.enr'Il oN~'l E-sttS'`~~~ tZrr~ ~S~ ~v.)E~,'r S"lYl,r ,~ w' 11 $E C~tab'M.U~l'e9 ~d 14) Wdl the proposed pro/ed change the pattern, scale, or character o/the surrounding general area of the pro/ed7 /n r~ I.J I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTERVnf6al Study Part1 docPege ~ ~ d~ Rev 6130/03 11) Descnbe any noise sources and theirlevels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadwaynoise, etc) and howthey will aped proposed uses 15) Indicate the type ofshort-terrr>•a'nc long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount How will these noise levels aflect adjacent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? iF7 ISP \..l , G~1l.m,tRlhlcl ot7~1~tJS 7f lL~•Y}'1~'~ }{y ME C~Nb'TYWG'ilor-) Kt '16) 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water suppDes) into which the site drams: F(,'C ~(l ~ ~~ alp 18) Indicate expected amount of wafer usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clanficauon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distnct at 987-2591 a Residential (gaVdey) ~ ~ Peak use (gaUDay) b Commero~aUlnd (gaUday/ac) - Peak use (gaUmiNec) - 19) Indicate proposed method o/sewage disposal ^ Septic Tank ~,iSewer Il septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests It discharge to a sanitary sewage system Is proposed indicate expected daily sewagegenerahon. (SeeAttachmentAlorusageest~mates) For furtherclanficatlpn,pleasecontactUie Cucamonga County Water Dutnct et 987-2591 a Residential (gal/day) 3{ °z4~ b Commeroial/Industnel (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 2D) Number of residential unls• y~ Detached (indicate range o! parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maxfmum lot sae /`>r\ ~J I ~"~ '~ 1~-H~G ~n'O f'L d~0, 00O 'S~ ~ M I N 1 --Iz' • Attached (indicate whether units ere rental or for sale unifs)• 11PLANNING~FINALU=ORMS\COUNTERVnitlal SWdy PaAl docPape: ~~o~'' Rev 6i'30/03 Pc-tr9 /vt.~-(-~l Ens Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees NQ ~-~S 21) Anhc~pated range of sale pnces and/or rents Sale Pnce(s) $ ~ Z Omo to $ 7 0 000 Rent (per month) $ to $ ~ • 22) Specdy number of bedrooms by and type ,P~~a 1 r,~ D1 ~ ~ 0~2 `30-~ c~ p,EOq.eov-~ ~1-o~se5 • . 23) Indicate anhapated household srze by unit type' L ~. h~rJ 4 -rte 5 ~v~nsoas (~~- 24) Indicate the expected numbero/school children who will be residing wahrn the protect Contact the appropnate School D~stncts as shown m Attachment B• e Elementary. b. tumor N~gh• ~ ~ • c. Senior High l ~ COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type o1 use(s) and major lunchon(s) of commercval, mdustnal or tnstitu8onal uses: 26) Total floor area of commeroial, mdustnal, or tnshtuhonal uses by type. 27) Indicate hours of operaGOn 28) Number of employees Total Maximum Shift • Time o(Mazimum Shift (~ I ~PLANNING~FINALV=ORMS~COUNTERVmUa1 Study Pant docPage ~ /'~ ~ ~~ Rev 6r30/03 w 29) Prowde breakdown of antiapatedlob classlficahons, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an Indtcahon o/the rate of hue for each classthcabon (attach addrt~onal sheet d necessary) • 30) Esbmahon of the number o/ workers to be hued that currently reside m the City '31) For commerotal and mdustnal uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of au pollution emissions (Data should be venfied through the South Coast Au Oualrty Management Drstnct, at (818) 572-6283): ALL PROJECTS 32) Heve the water, sewer, tire, and flood control agencies serving the prolect been contacted to determine !hart abtldy to • provide adequate service to the proposed prolect? ll so, please md~cate then response -~ G~ c A n orb qA t~~N"1 w .~. ~K'` l'MS 3~,a c~,~-rncr~ ., s ~-t°E , 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic metenals? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic metenals include, but are not limited to PCB's, redioactive substances, pesticides and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and other /lammable liquids end gases Also note underground storage o/any o/the above. Please list the metenals anti descnbe then use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates o/use, II known V~J ~LNow,J I ~PIANNING~INAL~FORMS~COUNiERUnIUaI Study Partt docPape y~ ~~ d'_J Rev 6/30/03 a 34) t~cludmg bu ~no~ mr~ed to those examples lasted abo~e?rlf yes, provide enr nventorry of ahlasu h mate a srto be used and proposed method of disposal The location o/such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the appl~cahon plans 1 hereby certify that the statements fumtshed above and m the attached exhibits present the data and mformahon required for t ~ he best o/ my knowledge enl d belie/ el~urther unders end that add hone/ mformetton maybe required to 6~ ubm tted be% en adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Date: ~~ ~ ~ ~ ¢ Stgnature• l rule: ~'(/~~ ~."~ 1/.~ ~''Lo ,~,Zvlto/i~rsr~ ~"~ Rav sr,~oros I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTERUnlhal Study Partt docF' _ • ATTACHMENT B . Contact the school dlstnct for your area for amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Llne Road, Sulte F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Swte 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-8942 Etlwanda 6061 East Avenue P.O Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 . High School Chattey Hlgh School 211 West 5th Street Ontano, CA 91762 (909) 988-8511 I\PLANNING\FINAUFORMS\COUNTERUniLalSWdy Parn docPi ~(~v~~ Rev 6/30/03 City of Rancho Cucamonga • ' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM ' INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 2 Related Files: VARIANCE DRC2004-01285 - ETCO DEVELOPMENT, INC -Requests to reduce the minimum depth of Lot 10 from 200 feet to 180 feet to allow Lot 11 to have frontage along Etiwanda Avenue and to allow Lot 12 to also have frontage along Etiwanda Avenue and a reduced minimum width from 90 feet to 75 feet in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of the I-210 Freeway -APN. 225-171-19. 3 Description of Project: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16867 - ETCO DEVELOPMENT, INC - A subdms~on of B 9 gross acres of land into 12 residential lots in the Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of the I-210 freeway and on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue -APN 0225-171-19 4 Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Etco Development, Inc 1351 Pomona Road, Swte 210 Corona, CA 92882 5 General Plan Designation: Very Low Residential (.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) 6 Zoning: Very Low Residential (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Existing single-faintly residential developments surround the sde from the north, east, and west and to the south the 210 Freeway is directly south of the site 8 Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Croic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Rozalynne Thompson, Contract Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System -Regional Water Quality Control Board Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan -City of Rancho Cucamonga Cucamonga Valley Water District -Water and Sewerage connection permds ~~aC~ • _J Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used m this report: CVW D -Cucamonga Valley Water Distract EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,p -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAOMD -South Coast Air Quality Management Distract SWPPP-Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Mode17G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a 'Potentially Significant Impact,° 'Potentially Signficant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,° or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. OAesthetics O Agncuttural Resources (x) Au Quality OBiological Resources (x) CuRural Resources (x) Geology & Sods ()Hazards & Waste Materials ()Hydrology & Water Quality ()Land Use 8 Planning ()Mineral Resources (x) Noise () Populabon 8 Housing (x) Public Services ()Recreation () TransportationlTraffic () Utildies & Service Systems ()Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared (x) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant ect In this case because revisions In the project have been made by, reed to, by t p Jett proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION wlll be p n Prepared By Reviewed By Rev. 4/20/05 ~ ~C ~l Date d~ Date ~~~ ~ 7' ~~ -. - Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 Less man S~finificent Leis Issues and Supporting Information Sources PalenU611Y Sipuhcent WUfi Mlhpetlon 7nen Siprxfieem No ` I I tail t I EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the protect a) Have a substantial affect a scenic wsta~ () () (/) ( ) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not () () () (/) limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings w~thm a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing casual character or () () () (/) qualdy of the sde and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which () () (/) ( ) would adversely affect day or nighttime views m the area Comments: a) The protect site is not located wdhrn a view corridor according to General Plan 6chibit III-15, hence, d is not anticipated that the prolect would have an impact to a scenic vista b) The prolect sde contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways wdhm the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga c) The site is located immediately north of the I-210 freeway and is characterized by single- family residential development to the north, east, and west. The casual qualdy of the area will not degrade as a result of this prolect. City standards regwre the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of the overhead utility lines and utddy enclosures m accordance wdh Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) Since it is anticipated in the future that twelve homes will be developed on the site, the prolect would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate wamty The design and placement of the light fixtures will be shown on Sde Plans which regwre review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, drffusmg, or indvect lighting to avoid glare. The Ightmg will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the prolect site The impact is not considered signrficant 2 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the protect. a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland () () (/) ( ) of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the Calrfomia Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict wdh existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Williamson Act contract? _ c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, () () () (/) due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? /~ ~a"g - u • Rev 4/20/05 Irntial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 ~~ m~ s,~~~ ~~ Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g PO1e"'~"Y Siprxrrcem wrtn Miopetlon ~'°" SiOMficant No i ~~ ~ i n ~ Comments: a) The site is not designated as Pnme Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance The sde is immediately north of the I-210 freeway and is characterized by residential development to the north, west, and east There are approximately 1,300 acres of Pnme Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2. The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located m the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viabddy is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland m the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was utimately adopted by the Cdy Council. The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) The site is located immediately north of the I-210 freeway and is characterized by residential development to the north, east, and west The nearest agricultural use is more than 11 miles northeast from the protect site Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the pro/ect~ a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable () () () (/) au quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially () (/) () ( ) to an existing or protected air quality violation? c) Result m a cumulatively considerable net increase of any () () () (/) crdena pollutant for which the prolect region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations e) Create obtectionable odors affecting a substantial number () () () (/) of people Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels m the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Rev 4/20/05 ~~~ Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Less marl Sigrafieant Less P°IerNelty WM roan Issues and Supporting Information Sources sag^.~ t 1~ geu ~ a?^•~' "° b) During the construction phases of the prospective development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction actmties While most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and egwpment work and operate at one development site until then tasks are complete. They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again. Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and egwpment emissions are regwred to be assessed by the South Coast Av Quality Management Distract (SCADMD) on a protect-specrfic basis. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-signrficant levels. 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the Issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low- emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was Investigated and found to be Infeasible for the protect. Contactors shall also conform to any construction measures Imposed by the South Coast Alr duality Management District (SCADMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted In SCADMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high- volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCADMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCADMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material In accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering~jpractices. Rev. 4/20/05 r" ~ ~n Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Less Than Spniflcera Less PotenaellY With Tian Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sipnificenl nuuoaum s~necem Na ~. ~ Ircro tea I I Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) In accordance with Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 241nch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 8) SCA~MD and Reg onal W ter OualityrControl Boa db[RWOCB)) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM10) emissions, In accordance with SCA~MD Rule 403. i 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RW~CB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain Inactive for 98 hours or more to reduce PM,p emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean aftemative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut oft equipment when not In use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6). Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nitrogen Oxides (Nox), Reactive Organic Gases (ROG), and PMTe would not exceed SCAOMD thresholds for signrficance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant rf they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in signrficant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively signrficant rf they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant The following mtigation measures shall be implemented: 10) All residential structures shall be required to incorporete high efficiencyflow polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 11) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identrfied the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council _ c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamoyn~ga~ja~rea, which already exceed Federal and State Rev 4/20/05 /,J Y-- ~ I - Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Lase man SpnlfieeM Less PolenGellY Wsfi TMn Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Si~nlfieeM M~IiQetlM s~ca~icam Na I atl Into tetl I I standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse Impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilties, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create signrficant impacts rf they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants Identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The protect site is located within 1/4 mile of several residential developments. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce the impact to less-than-significant levels e) Typically, the subdivision and subsequent development do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ech 4 . a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (/) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the Califomia Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or () () () (/) other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the Califomia Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected () () () (/) wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, veinal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlrfe corridors, or impede the use of native wildlrfe nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting () () () (/) biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan u L_~ Rev 4/20/05 ~~ ~joZ- Initial Study for Tentative Traot Map SUBTT16867 • • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 ,~.m~ SipNficant Lms Issues and Supporting Information Sources PotenOally $,grvficent WiN Mitlpaoon Tl,en SiGrufiram No ~ ct ~nco ~atl ~ ~ ecc Comments: a) The protect site is located in an area developed with residential uses The site has been previously disrupted during the construction of the infrastructure and surrounding developments According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of senselive biological resources; therefore, development wrfl not adversely affect rare or endangered speaes of plants or animals because of the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent welh the General Plan Land Use Plan. b) The protect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the protect well not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on-sele. As a resuk, protect implementation would have no impact on these resources. d) The matonty of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wrfdlrfe corridors that may have existed. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are no heritage trees on the protect site, therefore, the proposed protect is not in conflict with any local ordinance. f) The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the potect a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the signficance () () () (/) of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5 b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () (/) () ( ) of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) On October 21, 2004, SWCA environmental consultants prepared a cukural resources assessment of the protect sde A cistern dating from 1904-1914 was discovered on-sde at the extreme northeast comer. Because the cistern has lost too much integrity because of freeway construction and residential development, d would not be considered a 'Historic Resource° per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). There wrfl be no impact b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site, however, • the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11). Construction actively, particularly grading, sort excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: Rev. 4/20/05 ~ ~C s3 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Less Then Si9rvficent Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources PotensaAy ao,~we WM M~ouenm Then sP.ecem No ~ i~ ee i ~ i 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact Interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant mod'rfication without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on signrficant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CE~A guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the Inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original Illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information • Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 511) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the San Bemardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the prolect site, however, the area has a high sensdivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposded during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago durng the late Pleistocene epoch of the Quatemary penod, when the last 'Ice Age° and the appearance of modem man occurred, may contain signrficant vertebrate fossils. The protect sae is underlain by Quatemary alluvum per General Plan Exhibd V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented• 2) If any paleontologicai resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submR a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the repid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the Interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert • earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed - salvage. If construction personnel~/make the discovery, the grading Rev 4120/05 ~ ~ 37 LJ Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 ~~ m~ Siprvecam Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Patenoally av.~~ WM ewveu«~ T~vi sow ~ ~ e<, ~nro red ~ i contractor should Immediately divert construction and notlty the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed prolect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The prolect site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the prolect area No evidence is in place to suggest the prolect site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050 5) states that if human remains are discovered on-stte, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of ongin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 98. As adherence to State regulations is requued for all development, no mitigation is regwred in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-sde No adverse impacts are anticipated • 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the prolect a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated () () () (`~) on the most recent Algwst-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. u) Strong seismic ground shakings () () () (/) w) Seismic-related ground failure, including O O O (/) liquefaction iv) Landslides () () () (/) b) Result in substantial sod erosion or the loss of topsoils () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or sod that is unstable, or () () () (/) that would become unstable as a result of the prolect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive sod, as defined in Table 18-1-B () () () (/) of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial nsks to hie or property " e) Have sods incapable of adequately supporting the use of () () () (/) septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater Rev. 4/20/05 {~~C~ Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 ~, nice rNproficent Legs Issues and Supporting Information Sources s,~°~ w v~e~ s; fi~~ Ne ~ ~~ ea ~ ~ Comments: a) No known faults pass through the sde and d is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is d in the Rancho Cucamonga Cdy Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1 and Section 5 1 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hill Fault, passes wthin 61 mile northwest of the sde, and the Cucamonga Faun Zone lies approximatey 6.5 miles northwest. These faults are both capable of producing M„, 6.0.7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to M„,7 5 earthquakes is 8.5 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8 2 earthquakes, is 11 miles northeasterly of the sde Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhering to the Unrform Bwlding Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-signrficant Prospective development on the site will regwre the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subtect to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts m the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the follov~nng fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-signrficant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCA~MD and RW~CB) dally to reduce PMro emissions, in accordance with SCA~MD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PMro emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMro emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soli stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWaCB) shall be applied to all Inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMro emissions. b) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or wdhdrawals of water from the aquifer The protect would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The sde is not within a geotechmcal hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or sod type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5.1-2 Sod types onsite consist of Hanford Sandy Loam Soil assoaation according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated. c) The matonty of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types on-site consist of Hanford San Loam Soil assoaation according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibd 5 1-3 These soils are typically well-drained, runoff is slow to medwm, and the hazard of erosion is slight to moderate No adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev. 4/20/05 T Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Lass man SipNGeant Lacs Issues and Supporting Information Sources. PotennallY S,oNeoam Wad FLnpaaan Than sipnificaN No I a nico ao i i ~ d) It is anticipated that future development on the site will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal To date, no septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed • 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the pro/ect a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous matenals into the environment? c) Enid hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous matenals, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school d) Be located on a sde which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous matenals sties compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area? f) For a protect within the vicinity of a pnvate airstnp, would O O O (/) the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area g) Impair implementation of or physically intertere wdh an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant nsk of loss, () () () (/) intury or death involving wiidiand fees, including where wildlands are adtacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ Comments: a) Rev. 4/20/05 ~ ~~ The protect will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. The City partiapates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Matenals Division that is more eomprehensrve that any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System MultrHazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies. Compliance with Federal, Statg, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous matenals and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-signrficant No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed protect does not include the use of hazardous matenals or volatile fuels. The Cdy partiapates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state. The Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 ~~ 90Nrrcarn Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g PaBn°°~~y Sipnifieent "~ Mitlpeoon Th8° 99Nrrcant No ~ n Into tee ~ ~ City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for signrficant impacts to a level less-than-signrficant No adverse impacts are anticpated c) There is no school located wdhm 1/4 mile of the protect sde The protect sde is located wdhm 66 mile of the nearest existing or proposed school Typically, residential subdivisions and their assoaated uses do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The proposed protect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance matenals site A recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous matenals. No impact is anbcipated. e) The site is not located wdhm an Arport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public avport. The protect sde is located approximately 9 miles northerly of the Ontario Arport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the Cty's westerly limas. No impact is anticpated. g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fve Distract in the event of a disaster Because the protect includes at least two points of public street access and is regwred to comply wdh all applicable City codes, including local fve ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticpated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fve District Strategic Plan 2000-2005; however, the proposed protect site is not located wdhm a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibd V-7. 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the pro/ect: a) Violate any water qualdy standards or waste discharge requirements () () (/) ( ) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (/) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aqurfer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permds have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the sde () () () (/) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or aver, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or sedation on- or off-sde - Rev. 4/20/05 ~~~~~ r~ LJ Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Less roan SiOmficant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources. Potenfially s~omfi~aro WM Mlepeaon Than s,n~~ "° 1 ct Inca retad I I act d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (/) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the () () () (/) capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? () () () (/) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that () () () (/) would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (/) intury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp t) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? () () () (/) Comments• a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water Distract (CVWD) The protect is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permd under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SW RCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment Prior to commencement of construction of a protect, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permd The General permit requires all dischargers to comply wdh the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading• Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation • Perform inspections of all BMPs Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction protect discharges A construction protect for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES Rev 4/20/05 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTTi 6867 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Lass 7nan Sipnficent Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources PotenOnlly 9pnRitant win, Mtlpatlon man $ip,tlficant No I Irco ted I I permit Construction protect proponents are required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) To comply with the NPDES, the project construction contractor will be regwred to prepare a (SW PPP) during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WIMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff The applicant has submitted a WOMP, prepared by SP Consuhing Group, which identifies (BMPs) to minimize the amount of pollutants such as eroded soils entering the drainage system after construction Runoff from driveways, roads, and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entenng the storm drain system The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent Construchon Achvihes: 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used . on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included In Greding Plan, and Implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An Inspection and maintenance program shall be Included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or grevel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there Is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be pertormed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction OperaGOnal. 5) The developer shall Implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by SP Consulting Group to reduce pollutants after . construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Rev 4/20/05 ~~~~~ Initial Study for Tentative Tract MaD SUBTT16867 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Less Than sipmficenl Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources PMenhally sipninc.nl Wnh Mmve9an Then spnn~em Na I ect Inco tetl I I ed 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits. 7) Practical Information materials wail be provided to the first residents/occupants/tenants. These materials shall Include general housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of stormwater quality, and BMPs that eliminate or reduce pollution during property improvements (concrete work, pool Installation, etc). These materials will be made available by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The developer shall request these materials in writing at least 30 days prior to intended distribution and shall then be responsible for their distribution at the time of occupancy of prospective residences. 8) If a homeowner's association is formed, conditions, covenants, and restrictions shall be required for the purpose of water quality protection. Alternatively, use restrictions may be developed by building operator through lease terms, or other mechanisms. Pesticide application in common areas must be performed by an applicator certified by the California Department of Pesticide Regulation. 9) Sites must be designed to contain and infiltrate roof runoff, or direct roof runof( to vegetative swales or butter areas. 10) Irrigation methods should be utilized to minimize runoff of excess irrigation water across Impervious surtaces and Into the stormwater conveyance system. Such measures include employing rain-triggered shutoff devices to eliminate or reduce irrigation during and Immediately after precipitation, using mulches (such as wood chips) to minimize sediment in runoff and to maintain soil Infiltretion capacity, and coordinating design of the Irrigation system and landscape to minimize overspray and runoff. Irrigation systems should consider the use of flow reducers or shutoff valves triggered by a pressure drop to control water loss in the event of broken sprinkler heads or water supply Imes. Water conservation devices such as programmable irrigation timers and soil moisture sensors should also be considered. 11) Project plans shall include Source-Control BMPs to decrease the potential for erosion of slopes and/or channels, consistent with local codes and ordinances, and with approval of all agencies with jurisdiction (e.g USACOE, RWOCB, and CDFG). The following design principles shall be considered, end Implemented where determined to be applicable and feasible by the City of Rancho Cucamonga: Convey runoff safely from the tops of slopes. Avoid disturbing steep or unstable slopes. Avoid disturbing natural channels. Rev. 4/20/05 f3 ~ yi Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 Issues and Supporting Information Sources City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 ~, men 9pnificern Less WM Then L~eDeepn $IQIefiCele No Install permanent stabilization of BMPs on disturbed slopes as quickly as possible. Vegetate slopes with native ordrought-tolerant vegetation. Control and treat flows in landscaping and/or other controls prior to reaching nature) drainage systems. Install permanent stabilization BMPs in channel crossings as quickly as possible, and ensure that increases in runoff velocity and frequency caused by the project do not excessively erode the channel. Install energy dissipaters, such as riprep, at the outlets of new storm drains, culverts, conduits or channels that enter unlined channels In accordance with applicable specifications to minimize erosion. Energy dissipaters shall be installed in such a way as to minimize impacts to receiving waters. On-site conveyance channels should be lined, where appropriate, to reduce erosion caused by increased flow velocity due to Increases in tributary impervious area. The first choice for linings should be grass or some other vegetative surtace, since these materials not only reduce runoff velocities, but also provide water quality benefits from filtration and Infiltration. If velocities in the channel are large enough to erode grass or other vegetative linings, riprap, concrete soil cement, or geo-grid stabilization may be substituted or used in combination with grass or other vegetation stabilization. Other design principles that are comparable and equally effective. 12) Signage such as notices regarding discharge prohibitions at storm drain Inlets to eliminate or reduce dumping and littering are required. The phrase "No Dumping -Flows to Creek," or an equally effective phrase as approved by the NPDES General Committee, must be stenciled on catch basins (inlets) to alert the public as to the destination of pollutants discharged Into stone drains. This signage must be maintained and a party responsible for maintenance should be Identified in the WOMP. 13) A pervious (porous) surface such as grass, modular pavers, or porous asphak or concrete, must be used where appropriate (light vehicle loading areas) to reduce runoff. 14) Materials used to reduce potential sources of pollutants in stormwater runoff by eliminating compounds that can leach Into runoff and reducing the need for pesticides, paints, and other materials are encouraged to be used. According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from ground water in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed prolect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a Rev. 4/20/05 R/ ~/' ~ ~~ Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 Less man $~vmficant Less Potenually WM Tien Issues and Supporting Information Sources s~oryn~e~n ~aaua~ sv~fi~ ~ recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2. The development of the site wdl regwre the grading of the site and excavation; however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surtace. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilties c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff because of the amount of new bwlding and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff wdl be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Budding Offiaal and City Engineer pnor to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact ~s not considered significant d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new budding and hardscape proposed on a sde; however, all runoff wdl be conveyed to existing storm dram facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect wdl not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Bwlding Official and City Engineer pnor to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-sde. No impacts are anticipated e) Grading actiwties associated with the construction penod could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is for new development or significant redevelopment, therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 15) Prior to Issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP), Including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants Into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall Identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. ~ 6) Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (l.e., a copy of the Waste DI'scharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. f) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5.] No adverse impacts are expected g) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan FYh~hit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected. Rev 4/20/05 ~~C~~ Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 less 7nen aanrwn Less roiennmiy wro, rne~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources ygNficant Mmoenm SlPUficant No h) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm dram system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debns dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibd V-6. The prolect sde is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected i) There are no oceans, lakes or reservoirs near the prolect site, therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabnel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debns dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the prolect a) Physically divide an established communrty~ () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with lunsdiction over the prolect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or () () () (/) natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located north of the I-210 freeway and ~s charactenzed by residential development to the north, west, and east. This prolect wdl be of similar design and size to surrounding residential development to the north, east, and west. The prolect wtll become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are antiepated b) The prolect site land use designation is Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre). The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan and does not intertere with any pollees for environmental protection. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The prolect sde is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. Accordrng to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the prolect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development wdl not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the prolect is surrounded by' urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. Rev 4/20/05 /v ~C S0~/ • Irntial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 less man Sipnficant Less Patanua0y WM Then Issues and Supporting Information Sources ao~~a~am Mmoaaon Si,nrwn Na ~ Inco tea ~ ~ 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specrfic plan or other land use plan Comments• a) The sde is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery sde, therefore, there is no impact • 11. NOISE. Would the pro/ect result rn a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (/) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels () () () (/) in the prolect vicinity above levels existing wthout the prolect d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient () (/) () ( ) noise levels in the prolect vicinity above levels existing without the prolect e) For a prolect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the prolect expose people residing or working in the prolect area to excessve noise levels f) For a prolect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would () () () (/) the prolect expose people residing or working in the prolect area to excessive noise levels? ~ ~G~l~ Rev 4/20/05 Initial Study for Tentatroe Tract MaD SUBTT16867 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 Less Then ~ ~~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources s„ufi'am eno~~ s No i i~ ,~ i i Comments: a) The protect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out because of traffic noise from 210 Freeway. The City of Rancho Cucamonga regwres all residential protects to conform to applicable noise criteria, 65 decibels for the exterior of a budding and 45 deabels for the interior of a structure. Therefore, Gordon Bracken and Associates, Acoustical and Energy Engineers pertormed an Acoustical Analysis on September 16, 2005, to determine the exterior and interior noise exposure at the protect site Also, potential mitigation measures were identified Although residential construction is not proposed with the subdivision, the study assumes placement of future building pads approximately 100 feet north of the southern property line The eMenor average noise levels reported were 69 2 deabels as measured from the southwestern comer of the site and 70.1 deabels as measured from the southeastern comer of the sde To mitigate exterior noise, the study recommends construction of a 14-foot high sound barrier along southern property line of the protect site at the time homes are bwtt. The study presumes that the barriers will be erected at site grade, reduang exterior noise level to 65 deabels or less at the fvst floor level. Mitigation measures listed below would reduce exterior noise levels to less-than-signrficant levels: 1) Construct sound attenuation barriers along the south tract boundary per tM recommendations of the Noise Impact Study (Gordon Bracken end Assoeietes, September 16, 2005). This sound barrier shall be constructed as early as possible during construction of this project. Walls heights greater than 8 teat • shall require approval of a variance application. Prospective structures on the lots will be exposed to exterior noise levels as high as 72 1 dBA CNEL This will regwre mtenor noise reduction levels as high as 27.1 dBA The following mtigation measure would ensure that interior noise levels are reduced to an acceptable level 2) Onee Building Plans are submitted to the Planning Department, an Acoustical Analysis shall be prepared to determine the building mitigation required to meet the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard. b) The uses assoaated with this type of protect normally do not induce ground borne vibrations As such, no impacts are antiapated. c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed actnnties will not significantly Increase traffic; hence, are not antiapated to increase the ambient noise levels within the viandy of the protect. d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction egwpment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mdigate the short-term noise impacts once construction commences. 3) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. ~ ~c ~~ Rev 4/20/05 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 less men Spruhcant Lau Issues and Supporting Information Sources PMenOelly ypniRwm WM rnrogaaon Rian s~anecnn+ Na ~ Inrn te0 ~ act ~ azt 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property Ime. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified In Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, If noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall Immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 5) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-sde construction equipment; however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be requved: 6) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, Including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, If heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport Located approximately 9 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 5 miles to the west of the Citys westerly limits. No impact is antiapated 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the pro/ect~ a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, edher () () () (/) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessdating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the () () () (/) construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments: a) The protect is located m a predominantly developed area and will not population growth Construction activities at the sde will be short-term long-term employees to the area No impacts are anticipated f3~~ `~`~ Rev 4/20/05 induce substantial and will not attract Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 Page 23 Less Then 9pNficent Less PMenaellY WNh Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources SipeficaN nungenon s~omncem Na ImoacY IncomweteC Inpecl _. ~ b) The protect site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c) The protect site is vacant land No impacts are antiapated 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the pro/ect result to substantial adverse physical impacts assoaated wdh the provision of new or physically altered govemmental facilities, need for new or physically altered govemmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response Mmes or other performance ob/ect~ves for any of the public services. a) Fire protections () (~) () ( ) b) Police protection? O O O (~) c) Schools? () () () (~) d) Parks O O O (~) e) Other public facilities? () () () (~) Comments: a) The site, located north of the I-210 freeway and west of Etiwanda Avenue, would be served by a Fire Station No 176 located approximately 1 75 mile from the protect site. The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new faalities Standard condi4ons of approval from the Uniform Bwlding and Fire Codes will be placed on the protect so no impacts to fire services will occur b) Additional police protection is not regwred as the addition of the protect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the protect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. c) The Alta Loma School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School Distract serve the protect area Both school distracts have been notified regarding the proposed development A standard condition of approval will regwre the developer to pay the school impact fees. With this standard mitigation, impacts to the school distracts are not considered significant. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located 55 mile from the protect site The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing faalities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause t_he need to construct new faalities. A standard condition of approval wily requve the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are antiapated e) The proposed protect will utilize theexisting public faalities The site is in a developed area currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The protect will not regwre the construction of any new faalities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9.9), the protected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the protected demand. -The General Plan FEIR identified the r1 Rev 4/20/05 ~ ~ C ~~ Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 Less Then 9pnACem Less PoteneellY N'M 71i0n Issues and Supporting Information Sources s,ror~em miegeeon sm.ncem No ~ loco etl ~ ~ cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City. 14. RECREATION. Would the pro/ect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional () () () (/) parks or other recreational facilrties such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational facildies or regwre () () () (/) the construction or expansion of recreational faalrties, which might have an adverse physical effect on the enwronment~ Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located .55 mile from the protect sRe. This protect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A standard condition of approval will regwre the developer to pay park development fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above i 15. TRANSPORTATION/1'FlAFFIC. Would the pro/ect. a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in O O O (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacrty of the street system (i.e , result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle tops, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either O O O (/) an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety nsks~ d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm egwpment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) ResuR in inadequate parking capacty? () () () (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Rev 4/20/05 f3 ~C y~ Initial Study for Tentative Tract Mao SUBTT16867 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 LESS m~ Sprvficant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Po[en0alty y,~,scam WRY ~u~~non 7~en eoN~~ No ~ ins ~ i i Comments: a) Development of the sites is not proposed with the subdivision. Once the sites are developed, it is anticipated the prolect will generate approximately 156 vehicle trips daily The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each dwelling unit will generate 13 taps daily. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The prolect is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in prolect design The prolect will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume or congestion at intersections The prolect site will be regwred to prowde street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of Bwlding Permds. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No impacts are anticpated b) As discussed above, the quantity of vehicular trips generated by future development is minimal. The prolect will generate 84 taps in the a m peak hour and 12 tops in the p m peak hour, which is less than 250 two-way peak hour trip threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for regwring a traffic impact analysis The prolect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing The prolect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials The prolect will be regwred to prowde street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticpated. c) Located approximately 7 miles northerly of the Ontario Avport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated d) The prolect is in an area that is mostly developed The prolect will be requved to prowde street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The prolect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The prolect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The prolect will be designed to prowde access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated. f) The prolect design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will therefore not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are antiapated g) The prolect design includes, or the prolect will be conditioned to prowde, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) • • Rev 4/20/05 ~j ~C~ Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 L C~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 Less Than ape.beern less Issues and Supporting Information Sources. POtemially so~b~em Wab Mitipebon Than 99ruficant No I act IMO tad 1 act I 6. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the pro/ech a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (~) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (~) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause signrficant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water () () () (~) drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause signrficant environmental effects. d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (~) protect from existing enttlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (~) provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that d has adequate capacity to serve the protest's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to O O O (~) accommodate the protest's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (~) regulations related to solid waste Comments: a) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Emp+re Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated. c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, woived bVetheeBuildin igOfficial handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be app y 9 and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits The impact is not considered signficant d) The protect +s served by the CVWD water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect.-No impacts are anticipated. • e) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are Rev. 4/20/05 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 Issues and Supporting Information Sources City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 27 9Pnfihcant I ~ ' I Sipivficent I No f) Solid waste disposal wdl be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with suffiaent capaaty to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This protect complies wnh Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The Crty oT Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality () () () (/) of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife speaes, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the motor periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limned, but cumulatively considerable? ('Cumulatively considerable° means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when wowed in connection wnh the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects)? c) Does the protect have environmental effects that wnl () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either dvegtly or indvectly~ Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the sne is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, n is unlikely that any endangered or rare speaes would inhabit the sne b) If the proposed protect were approved, and the resultant lots were developed, then the applicant would be regwred to develop the site in accordance wnh the Cny of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certrfication of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of bwld-out in the City and Sphere of Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in signrficant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, av quality, the acoustical envronment, library services, and aesthetics and casual resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-signrficant levels As such, the Cny adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balanang the benefns of development under the General Plan Update against thThese benefns includeless overalel impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space Wnh these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is regwred • Rev 4/20/05 ~ ~t" ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16867 Page 28 c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-signrficant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects The effects tldentrfied above for this proaectrwel a within9 he s opelaof land adequately 15063(c)(3)(D). analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certrfied October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (/) Etiwanda Specific Plan EIR (SCH #82061801, certified July 6, 1983) (/) Other Noise Impact Study (Gordon Bracken 8 Associates, September 16, 2005) (/) Other Cultural Resource Assessment (SWCA Environmental Consulting, October 21, 2004) (/) Other Traffic Analysis (Transportation Engineering and Planning, November 13, 2004) Rev 4/20/05 ' ` "' ` ~J Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16867 Page 29 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the prolect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the prolect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no signs ant environmental effects would occur Date' /`~~~ ~~/ Applicant's Signature Pnnt Name and Title 7 ~ `f~ - / ~~~ `~~ ~pL/ Rev 4/20/05 ~ T ~J _ ~ ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public reviewln accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 0/the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 Public Review Period Closes: December 14, 2005 Project Name: Project Applicant: Etco Development, Inc. 1351 Pomona Road, Suite 210 Corona, CA 92882 Project Location (also see attached map): Located within the Very Low Residential Distnct on the north side of the I-210 freeway and on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0225-171-19 Project Description: A subdmsion of 8.9 gross acres of land into 12 residential lots in the Very Low Residential Distnct (.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) Related File: Vanance DRC2004-01285. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine If the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions m the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negatroe Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included In the attached Initiai Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477- 2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. December 14. 2005 _ Date of Determination Adopted By l°v ~~5s . RESOLUTION NO 06-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16867, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 8 9 GROSS ACRES OF LAND INTO 12 RESIDENTIAL LOTS IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT IN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AREA, LOCATED W EST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF THE I-210 FREEWAY, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN• 0225-171-19 A Rentals 1. Steve Schapel on behalf of Etco Development, Inc. filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867, as described m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as °the application ° 2. On January 11 and on January 25, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date 3. All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution. . NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows• 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings on January 11 and on January25, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby spenfically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located west of Etiwanda Avenue, immediately north of the I-210 Freeway, with a street frontageof approximately 302 feet and lot depth of 1,120 feet, and is presently vacant; and b The properties to the north and west are developed with single-family residences, the property to the south consists of the I-210 Freeway, the property to the east is Etiwanda Avenue; and c. The application proposes to subdmde 8 9 gross acres into 12 residential lots, and d The development is proposed to include the development of one single-family residence on each lot; and e The proposed lots range in size from 20,079 to 38,267 square feet, with an average • lot size of 25,416 square feet The Etiwanda Spenfic Plan standard is minimum 20,000 square feet and an average of 25,000 square feet. The properties to the north, east, and west are developed with single-family residences and are approximately 20,000 to 25,000 square feet m lot area /~ ~;cs~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-07 SUBTT16867 - ETCO DEVELOPMENT INC. January 25, 2006 Page 2 . 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public heanng and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby speafically finds and concludes as follows: a That the proposed proiect is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan; and b. That the proposed design is in accord with the obiectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and c That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence thatthe protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negatve Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance wilh the • Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negatroe Declaration and the initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained m said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the proiect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the proiect which are listed below as conditions of approval. c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proiect, there is no evidence that the proposed proiect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subiect to each and every condition set forth • below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 5~'~-' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-07 SUBTT16867 - ETCO DEVELOPMENT INC January 25, 2006 Page 3 Planning Department 1) Approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 is subject to the approval of Vanance DRC2004-01285 2) Streetscape along Etiwanda Avenue shall be designed per the Etiwanda Specific Plan 3) The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the adjacent I-210 Freeway. The standard format for the wntten notice shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval, prior to issuance of Building Permits The wntten notice shall be signed by the prospective buyer pnor to the acceptance of a cash deposit on the property. En gineenng Department 1) Vintage Drive is a designated °Collector" Street in the City General Plan (44 feet curb to curb, 66 feet wide nght-of-way) a) Join existing Vmtage Dnve in Tract Map No.14120-3 on the west end and align with Arapaho Road, across Etiwanda Avenue, on • the east end. lk t d ewa , si b) Provide curb, gutter, pavement, property line adjacen 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlights, traffic signing and stnpmg, street trees, drainage facilities, etc. on both sides of Vintage Dnve. c) Planning Commission has approved direct access to Vmtage Dnve Circular or hammerhead dnveway designs will be required on each lot Prevent all possible backing out into Vmtage Dnve 2) Etiwanda Avenue, as designated in the Etiwanda Specific Plan, is an 88-foot wide right-of-way. Match the existing west curb face alignment and provide a 13-foot wide landscape parkway plus a 7-foot wide bike lane adjacent to the nght-of-way line (total 20 feet from curb face), per Figure 5-24 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. a) Provide the following public improvements. cobble curb on comer returns to Vmtage Dnve, gutters, street pavement, 7-foot wide properly line adjacent bike lane/sidewalk, access ramps, 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights, signing, stnpmg including R26 °No Stopping° signs, street trees, and, if necessary, provide drainage and storm dram facilities to connect with the existing storm drain in Etiwanda Avenue. b) Street tree planting at the Vintage Dnve/Etiwanda Avenue - intersection shall be consistent with the neighborhood entry concept per Figure 5-12 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. /v~.g~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-07 SUBTT16867 - ETCO DEVELOPMENT INC January 25, 2006 Page 4 c) No direct driveway access to Etiwanda Avenue, however, provides Caltrans access approach to the existing service road 3) Prior to the issuance of building permits, all °Engmeenng Fees° including a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid. The Diversion Deposit and administrative fees are for the Construction and Demolition Dwersion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to the Bwlding and Safety Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engmeenng Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition prolect. 4) Development within the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Area is responsible for the City's adopted drainage fee (master plan and regional) as well as reimbursement to other development, or the City, for oversizing of drainage faalities as determined by the City Engineer. 5) Install private landscaping and irrigation systems in the parkway on Etiwanda Avenue side yards of Lots 11 and 12 prior to Public Improvements being accepted by the City. 6) The developer has proposed a Homeowners Association (HOA) to maintain the north side of Vintage Drive A lettered lot is preferable to an easement on Lot 12, but either way, the limits of maintenance responsibility should be delineated. The HOA will also maintain private facilities and Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Maintenance of BMPs identified in the WQMP shall be addressed in the prolect CC&Rs. Clanfy responsibilities of individual homeowners and HOA with respect to trails, private drainage facilities, and BMPs. 7) Provide a letter from Caltrans that states draining through thevfacilitles is acceptable and that the developed flows from this tract may be conveyed through that system. The proposed Conceptual Grading Plan indicates a private storm drain connection from the private trail gutter to an existing Caltrans trapezoidal channel with a 36-inch storm dram outlet. The City will not maintain this private drainage faalrty Maintenance shall be addressed in the Homeowners Assocation Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs). Also, show and explain how Caltrans will have access to maintain their facilities. Show the location and label existing or proposed drive approach to serve the existing Caltrans service access road. Absent of Caltrans approval, the prolect drainage faality should discharge to Etiwanda Avenue and, in that case, new drainage/storm drain system will need to be submitted l3 ~'s~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-07 SUBTT16867-ETCO DEVELOPMENTINC . January 25, 2006 Page 5 Environmental Mitigation Av Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'speafications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication. 2) Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low- emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that then use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed bythe South Coast Air Qualrty Management Distnct (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high- volume, low-pressure spray. . t d d d in e ar s no 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance stan SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions. Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time. • Schedule actmties to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil dunng and after the end of work penods. • Dispose of surplus excavated matenal in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineenng practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carved over to adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction t~~ Y-' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-07 SUBTT16867-ETCO DEVELOPMENTINC January 25, 2006 Page 6 Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 regwrements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB)) dailyto reduce Fme Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW QCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean altematlve fuel powered egwpment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not m use. • 10) All residential structures shall be regwred to incorporate high . effiaency/low polluting heating, av conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 11) All residential structures shall be requved to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-strapping. Guttural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resouroes are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction actiwties, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to requve incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using thevspecial qualities as a theme or focal point Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage p, ~C lal PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.06-07 SUBTT16867 - ETCO DEVELOPMENT INC . January 25, 2006 Page 7 Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdelmes Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i a ,paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: . . Assign a paleontological monitor, framed and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i e., San Bemardmo County Museum). Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected speamens with a copy of the report to San Bemardmo County Museum. Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RW QCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. • p~~CGa- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-07 SUBTT16867-ETCO DEVELOPMENTINC January 25, 2006 Page 8 • 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW QCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Hydrology and Water Quarry 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Bwlding Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) speafically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction activities entenng the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included m Grading Plan, • and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies speafic measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Speafy the timing of grading and construction to minimize sod exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a speafied time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sedimentfrom the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust m order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by SP Consulting Group to reduce _ pollutants after construction entenng the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. • ~ ~C ~3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-07 SUBTT16867 - ETCO DEVELOPMENT INC January 25, 2006 Page 9 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval pnor to the issuance of . Grading Permits 7) Practical information materials will be provided to the fvst residents/occupants/tenants These materials shall include general housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of stormwater quality, and BMPs that eliminate or reduce pollution during properly improvements (concrete work, pool installation, etc) These materials will be made available by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The developer shall request these materials in writing at least 30 days pnor to intended distribution and shall then be responsible for their distribution at the time of occupancy of prospective residences. 8) If a homeowner's association is formed, conditions, covenants, and restrictions shall be regwred forthe purpose of water quality protection. Alternatively, use restrictions may be developed by bwlding operator through lease terms, or other mechanisms. Pesticide application in common areas must be performed by an applicator certified by the California Department of Pesticide Regulation 9) Sites must be designed to contain and infiltrate roof runoff, or direct roof runoff to vegetative swales or buffer areas. 10) Irrigation methods should be utilized to minimize runoff of excess irrigation water across impervious surfaces and into the stormwater conveyance system. Such measures include employing rain-triggered shutoff devices to eliminate or reduce irrigation during and immediately after precipitation, using mulches (such as wood chips) to minimize sediment in runoff and to maintain soil infiltration capacity, and coordinating design of the irrigation system and landscape to minimize overspray and runoff Irrigation systems should consider the use of flow reducers or shutoff valves triggered by a pressure drop to control water loss in the event of broken sprinkler heads or water supply Imes. Water conservation devices such as programmable irrigation timers and soil moisture sensors should also be considered 11) Protect plans shall include Source-Control BMPs to decrease the potential for erosion of slopes and/or channels, consistent with local codes and ordinances, and with approval of all agencies with jurisdiction (e.g. USACOE, RWQCB, and CDFG). The following design principles shall be considered, and implemented where determined to be applicable and feasible by the City of Rancho Cucamonga: Iv ~ toy PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.O6-07 SUBTT16867 - ETCO DEVELOPMENT INC. January 25, 2006 Page 10 Convey runoff safely from the tops of slopes. Avoid disturbing steep or unstable slopes Avoid disturbing natural channels. Install permanent stabilization of BMPs on disturbed slopes as quickly as possible. • Vegetate slopes with native ordrought-tolerant vegetation. • Control and treat flows m landscaping and/or other controls poor to reaching natural drainage systems Install permanent stabilization BMPs in channel crossings as gwckly as possible, and ensure that increases in runoff velocity and frequency caused by the protect do not excessively erode the channel. • Install energy dissipaters, such as nprap, at the outlets of new storm drains, culverts, condwts or channels that enter unlined channels in accordance with applicable speafications to minimize erosion Energy dissipaters shall be installed in such a way as to minimize impacts to receiving waters. On-site conveyance channels should be Imed, where appropriate, to reduce erosion caused by increased flow veloaty due to increases in tributary impervious area. The first choice for lirnngs should be grass or some other vegetative surface, since these materials not only reduce runoff velocities, but also prowde water quality benefits from filtration and infiltration. If velocities in the channel are large enough to erode grass or other vegetative linings, nprap, concrete sod cement, or geo-grid stabilization may be substituted or used in combination with grass or other vegetation stabilization. Other design principles that are comparable and equally effective. 12) Signage such as notices regarding discharge prohibitions at storm dram inlets to eliminate or reduce dumping and littering are required. The phrase 'No Dumping -Flows to Creek," or an equally effective phrase as approved by the NPDES General Committee, must be stenciled on catch basins (inlets) to alert the public as to the destination of pollutants discharged into storm drams This signage must be maintained and a party responsible for maintenance should be identified in the WOMP ~ ~ ~ ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0.06-07 SUBTT16867 - ETCO DEVELOPMENT INC January 25, 2006 Page 11 13) A pervious (porous) surface such as grass, modular pavers, or porous asphalt or concrete, must be used where appropriate (light vehicle loading areas) to reduce runoff. 14) Materials used to reduce potential sources of pollutants in stormwater runoff by eliminating compounds that can leach into runoff and reducing the need for pestiades, paints, and other materials are encouraged to be used 15) Prior to issuance of Budding Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and idenhfying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that wdl be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identifythe structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga m June 2004. 16) Pnorto issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, applicantshall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Wafer Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the W aste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Bwldmg Offiaal for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permd Nose 1) Construct sound attenuation barriers along the south tract boundary per the recommendations of the Noise Impact Study (Gordon Bracken and Associates, September 16, 2005). This sound barrier shall be constructed as early as possible during construction of this protect Walls heights greater than 8 feet shall regwre approval of a variance application 2) Once budding plans are submitted to the Planning Department, an Acoustical Analysis shall be prepared to detenrnne the budding mitigation required to meet the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard. 3) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8.00 p.m and 6:30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards speafied m Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property Ime The developer shall hve a consultant to perform ~~~~0~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-07 SUBTT16867-ETCO DEVELOPMENTINC January 25, 2006 Page 12 weekly noise level monitoring as speafied in Development Code Section 17 02.120 Monitoring at other times maybe required by the Budding Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Bwlding Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Bwiding Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 5) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. 6) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m and 6:30 a.m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavytrucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily taps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JANUARY 2006. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST: Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of January 2006, by the following vote-to-wit. AYES: COMMISSIONERS NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: • Yv~~G~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16667 This Mitigation Mon~tonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the m~UgaUon measures identified m the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheebove-listed proiect This program has been prepared in compliance wrath State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the follownng elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded wrath the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure condtions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the proiect 2 A procedure of compliance and venfication has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action moll be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance well be reported 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flewble gwdelines. As monitonng . progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project The proiect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall wordmate enforcement of the MMP. The protect planner oversees the MMP and rewews the Reporting Forns to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each Gty department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The follownng steps well be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A fee covenng all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitonng or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant A MMP Reporting Form vall be prepared for each potentially significant impact and ds corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Montoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the proiect file moth the department hawng the onginal authonty for processing the protect Reports well be available from the City upon request at the follomnng address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Gvic Center Dnve • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 - - ~v~~~~ Mitigation Monitoring Program SUBTT16667 Page 2 • 3 Appropriate speGalists well be retained rftechnical expertise beyond the Cdy staffs is needed, as detertnined by the project planner or responsible Gty department, to monitor specific m~tigaUon activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4 The project planner or responsible Gty department well approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the speGfic phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Fortes for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring v~nll be signed off as completed by the probed planner or responsible Gty department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unanticipated Grcumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements oraddd~ons An MMP Reporting Forth vwll be completed by the probed planner or responsible Gty department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The probed planner or responsible Gty department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance v~nth any aspects of the MMP is not occumng after written notification has been issued The project planner or responsible Gty department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupanGes if compliance v~nth a mitigation measure . attached hereto is not occumng The probed planner or responsible Gty department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibd~ty of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the Gry These funds shall be used by the Gty to retain consultants and/or pay for Gty staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time 9 In those instances requinng long-tens probed monitoring, the applicant shall provide the Gty vnth a plan for mondonng the mitigation adiwt~es at the probed sde and reporting the monitoring results to the Gty Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitonng/reportmg plan shall conform to the Cdy's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development D~redor or Gty Planner prior to the issuance of budding pertnits. • ~~ "~/ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: Tentative Tract Maa SUBTT16867 Applicant: Steve Schai oel IETCO Develoament. Inc.) Initial Study Prepared by: Rozalvnne Thomason Date: October 17. 200b , Alr Quality ~ , .. , r° - . All construction equpment shall be maintained in CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 good operating condifion so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shell ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' spedfications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. Prior to the Issuance of any grading permits, the CP/BO C Review of plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was irnestigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well es City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans A!C 214 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. All asphak shall meet or exceed pertonnance BO B Review of plans A/C 2 standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1101) All construction equipment shell comply with BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. BO C Review of plans A/C ~ 214 1 of 11 ~ .. -. . • Phase gradmg to prevent the susceptibility of BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 large areas to erosion over extended periods of Ome. • Schedule activfties to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated matertai in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. ^ Sweep streets according to a schedule BO C During A 4 established by the City if sift is carved over to construction adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds BO C During A 4 (i e , wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in construction accordance with Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-Inch freeboard ratio on BO C During A 4 soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or Construction other suitable means. S The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 • soil-stabih~ing agent (approved by SCAQMD and construction Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB]) daily to reduce PMro emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Chemical soli-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all InacWe construction construction areas that remain inactive for 138 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or BO C During A/C 4 clean aftemaWe fuel-powered equipment where construction feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans A/C 214 construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use C~ (` ~f 11 s • ~ .. All residential end commerdai structures shall be BO C!D Review of plans C Z4 required to Incorporate high-effldency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. All residential and commerdai structures shall be BO CID Review of plans C Z4 required to Incorporate thermal pane vnndows and weather-stripping Cukurai Resources ~ ~ ~ ' - ~ ~ ' Y' ~ ; ; ; ~ `" ~'' °, '3 s . If any prehistoric archaeological resources are CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activitles, to take appropnate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CPBO C Review of report A/D 3/4 sites from demolklon or significant modification without an opportunity for the Ciry to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to regwre CPBO C Review of report A/D 3/4 Incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using then speaal qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CPBO C Review of report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guideAnes. • Prepare a technical resources management CP C Review of report A/D 314 report, documenting the irnentory, evaluatlon, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. ~ 3of11 n VJ ~ .. If any paleontological resource Q.e plant or animal CP B!C . Review of report A/D 4 fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submft a report of flndings that will also prowde specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures Q e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be IlmRed to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of report A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-tlme during the Interval of earthtlisturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being CP/BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 cleared or graded, divert earth~isturbing ectlvlties elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository Q e , San Bernardino County Museum) • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho CP D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum C3eology end Shcs The site shall be treated with water or other BO C Dunng A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and construction RWOCB) daily to reduce PMro emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. ~11 ~ - ~ ~ .. . , , . . Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a CE C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction emissions assodated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction from the site dunng such episodes Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inacflve for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality ' ~° °, , :~+''i; "s.., ~ ~' ~^° ~ ~ _ ,a: ,~, ~;i -;~ , , , Prior to Issuance of grading permits, the permit BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit to Building Offidal for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) spedflcaly Identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction activities entering the stone drain system to the maximum extent practical An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 In Grading Plan, end implemented for the proposed ' project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing actNities are Initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall Include the following measures at a minimum a) Spedry the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-s,te as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a spedfled time frame. During construction, temporary berms such as CP/BO/CE C Review of plans A/C 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff G 5of11 n .. ... ~. During construction, to remove pollutants, street CPlBO/CE C Review of plans A/C 7J4 cleaning will be performed prior to storm everds and after the use of water trucks to control dust In order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site The developer shall Implement the BMPs identified in CE C Review of report A/C Z4 the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by SP Consulting Group to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical Landscaping plans shall include provisions for CP/CElBO B/C/D Review of plans A/C Z4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pestiddes/trerbicldes Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, Including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permds. ' Practical information materials vnll be provided to the BO B/CID Review of plans A/C Z4 first residents/occupantsttenents. These materiels shall include general housekeeping prad3ces that contribute to protection of stortnwater quality, and BMPs that eliminate or reduce pollution during ~ property Improvements (concrete work, pool Installation, etc) These matedals will be made available by the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department The developer shall request these materals in writing at least 30 days prior to Intended distributlon and shall then be responsible for their distribution at the time of occupancy of prospective residences. If a homeowner's assoclation is formed, conditions, CE D Upon B 7 covenants, and restrictions shall be required for the Occupancy purpose of water quality protection. Alternatively, use restrictions may be developed by building operator through lease terms, or other mechanisms. Pesticlde application in common areas must be pertormed by an, applicator certlfied by the California Department of Pesticlde Regulation ~f 11 . f~ v .. -. Sites must be designed to contain and infiltrate roof BO/CE B/CID Review of plans A!C Z/4 runoff, or direct roof runoff to vegetative swales or buffer areas. Irngadon methods should be utilized to minimize BO/CE B/C/D Review of plans AIC 2/4 runoff of excess irrigaton water across impervious surteces end Into the stomnvater conveyance system Such measures include employing rain-triggered shutoff devices to eliminate or reduce Irrigation during and immediately after preapitatlon, using mulches (such as wood chips) to minimize sediment in runoff and to maintain soil InfittreUon capaaty, and coordinating design of the irdgahon system end landscape to minimize oversprey and runoff. Irngabon systems should consider the use of flow reducers or shutoff veNes triggered by a pressure drop to control water loss in the event of broken sprinkler heads or water supply lines Water conservation devices such es programmable Irrigation timers and soil moisture sensors should also be considered Project plans shall indude Source-Control BMPs to CE 8/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 decrease the potential for erosion of slopes and/or channels, consistent with local codes and ordinances, and with approval of all agendas with Jurisdictlon (e g USACOE, RWQCB, and CDFG) The following design prindples shall be considered, and implemented where determined to be applicable and feasible by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Convey runoff safely from the tops of slopes. CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 Avdd disturbing natural channels. CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 Install permanent stabilizatlon of BMPs on disturbed CE B/CID Raview of plans A/C 2/4 slopes es quickly as possible Vegetate slopes with native or drought-tolerent CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 214 vegetation. Control and treat flows in landscaping and/or other CE B/CID Review of plans A/C 2/4 controls prior to reaching nature) drainage systems 7 of 11 l~ ' .. " .. , . CE B/C/D Review of plans A1C 214 Install permanent stabdrzatlon BMPs in channel crossings as quickly as possible, and ensure that Increases in runoff velocty and frequency caused by the protect do not excessively erode the channel Install energy dissipaters, such as riprap, at the CE B/C!D Review of plans A/C 2/4 outlets of new storm drams, culverts, conduits or channels that enter unlined channels in accordance with applicable speGflcatlons to minimize erosion Energy dissipaters shall be installed in such a way as to minimize Impacts to receiving waters On-site conveyance channels should be Ifned, where CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 appropriate, to reduce erosron caused by Increased flow velocity due to increases in tributary impervious area Tha first choice for finings should be grass or some other vegetative surface, since these materials not only reduce runoff veloafies, but also provide water quality benefits from flltratlon and infiltretlon If velocitles m the channel are large enough to erode > grass or other vegetatve Unings, riprap, concrete soil cement, or geoyrid stabr6zaflon may be substituted or used in combination with grass or other vegetation 1 stabilizatlon Other design principles that are comparable and CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 equally effective. Signage such as notlces regarding discharge CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2l4 prohibitions at storm drain inlets to eliminate or reduce dumping and littering are regwred The phrase "No Dumping -Flows to Creek," or an equally effective phrase as approved by the NPDES General Committee, must be stenGled on catch basins pnlets) to alert the public as to the destination of pollutants discharged into storm drains. This Signage must be maintelned end a party responsible for maintenance should be identified m the WOMP ~11 ~~ A pervious (porous) surface such as grass, modular CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 pavers, or porous asphaR or concrete, must be used where appropriate eight vehiGe loading areas) to reduce runoff Materials used to reduce potential sources of BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2l4 pollutants in stormwater runoff by eliminating compounds that can leach into runoff and reducing the need for pesticides, paints, and other materials are encouraged to be used Pnor to issuance of Brulding Permits, the applicant CE B/C/D Revew of plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), Including a project descnption and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that vnll be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall Identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga In June 2004. Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, BO B/C!D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall obtain a ;Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the Cdy Building Offlcial for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise Construct sound attenuation barriers along the south BO B!C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 tract boundary per the recommendations of the Noise Impact Study (Gordon Bracken and Associates, September 18, 2005). This sound barrier shall be constructed as early as possible dunng construction of this project. Walls heights greater then 8 feet shall require approval of a variance application ..~, 1~ ~ 'J 9of11 Once building plans are submitted to the Planning CP/BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 Department, an Acoustical Anatysis shall be prepared to determine the budding mitigation requued to meet the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard Construction or grading shall not take place between BO C During A 4 the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, Construction Including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed BO C During A 4 the standards spedfied in Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured et the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring es specified in Development Code Section 17.02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Offidal Safd consultant shall report their findings to the Building Offidal within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Offidal If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in Intensity to a level of ~ compliance with above noise standards or halted L The perimeter block wall shall be constructed es early CP/BO C During A 3/4 ~ as possible in first phase. construction fl Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO C During A 4!7 hours of 8:00 p m. and 6 30 e m on weekdays, Construction Including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additlonalty, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daffy tops (courding both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. C~ n ~f 11 s ~ ~ Ksy to Checklist Abbroviations Responsible Paroon Monitoring Froqusney Msthod of VerHication Sanotiona CDD - Commundy Development Dlreetor or designee A- WRh Eech New Development A - On-ade Irepeetion 1 -WRhhold Recordation of Finai Map CP - CRy Planner or designee B - Pnor To Construction B -Other Agency PermR /Approval 2 -WRhhold Grading or Building Permit CE - Cdy Engineer or designee C -Throughout Canstruetion C -Plan Cheek 3 -WRhhold Cerlircete at Occupancy BO -Budding Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate SubmRtal Reports/Studies/ Plana) 4-Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain DeposR or Bonds FC -Fire Chle1 or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 - CRahon 11 of 11 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16867 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP APPLICANT: ETCO DEVELOPMENT INC LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND I-210 FREEWAY ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Completion Date A. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its ~ /~ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense m the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 is granted subject to the approval of Variance DRC2004-01285 B. Time Limits - 1 This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning ~J_/_ Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/~_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Plannrng Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Speafic Plan 2 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/~_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bwlding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdmsion, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first • ~ ~c 81 Project No SUBTT76867 Comoletwn Date 3 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the • time of building permit issuance 4 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner Forsingle- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 5. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, m accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and poor to approval of street improvement and grading plans Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements a Local Feeder Trails (i e , private equestrian easements) shall, at a minimum, be fenced with two-rail, 4-inch lodgepole °peeler° logs to define both sides of the easement, however, developer may upgrade to an alternate fence material b Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as veterinarians or hay delroeries, including a 12-foot minimum dove approach Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs c Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0 5% at the downstream end of a trail for a distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street Drainage devices may be regwred by the Bwlding Offiaal d Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot corral area in the rear yard Grade access from corral to trail with a maximum slope of 5 1 and a minimum width of 10 feet. • e For single family residential development within the EquestnaNRural Overlay District, at least one model home shall be provided with a constructed 24-foot by 24-foot corral wdh appropriate fencing 6 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the egwne animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met Indroidual lot owners in subdmsions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' assoaations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 7 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently wdh the Final Map or poor to the issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submd to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street E. Landscaping A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval poor to the issuance of budding permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision -~-~- ~_~- ~~_ ~_~- ~_~- ~~ ~-f- ~_~- / / _/~_ ~_/. ~~- ~~~ ~a Protect No SUBTT76867 Completion Date F. G. 2 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent vngation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 3 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater _/~_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows. one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq tt of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting requred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously _/~_ maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 5 New windrow planting of Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) is required at a ratio of 50 linear _/_J- feet per acre The size, spacing, staking, and irrigation of these trees shall compty with the Citys Tree Preservation Ordinance (RCMC 19 08 100) and Ettwanda Specific Plan Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval _/~_ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Stgn Ordinance and shall regwre separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs En vironmental 1 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the 210 and I-15 Freeways ~~ in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any ~ property 2 Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation ~~_ measures Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on-and off-site A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to final occupancy release The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA 3 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to the ~ /_ issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The bwlding plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 4 The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of ~~_ the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards Certification shall be submitted to the Building 8 Safety Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes 5 Mitigation measures are regwred for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of ~_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $495 00 prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds maybe used bythe City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mdigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit - ~ ~ c g3 Protect No SUBTT76867 Completion Date 6 In those instances regwring long term monitoring (i e) beyond final certificate of occupancy), the _/_/_ applicant shall provde a written monitoring and reporting program to the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualrfied to . know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) H. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be ~~_ marked with the protect file number (i e , SUBTT16667) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and ail other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of bulding permits for a new residential protect or mator addition, the applicant _/~_ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to• City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bwlding and Safety Official after tracVparcel map ~~_ recordation and prior to issuance of bulding permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday ~~_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays I. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with Calrfomia Bwlding Code, City Grading ~~_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Calrfomia to _J~- pertorm such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the ~~_ time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, ~_/_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits 5 If developed as a custom-lot subdivision, the following regwrements shall be met ~~_ a Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on-site ~ /_ drainage facilities necessary for dewaterrng all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Official prior to final map approval and prior to the issuance of grading perrnrts b Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto or over ~_/_ adtacent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Bwlding and Safety Official prior to the issuance of grading and building permits C _~ /~~~y Protect No SUBTT16867 Comoletion Date c On-site drainage improvements, necessary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided ~J-/- properties, are to be installed prior to issuance of bwldtng permits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel relative to which a bwldtng permit is requested . d Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety ~~- Department for approval prior to the issuance of grading and building permits (this maybe on an incremental or composite basis) e Ail slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses or ~-/- planted with ground cover for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Bwlding and Safety Official In addition, a permanent irrigation system shall be provided This requirement does not release the applicant/developer from compliance with the slope planting regwrements of Section 17 08 040 of the Development Code 6 A separate grading plan check submittal is requred for all new construction projects and for ~~- existing buldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. Dedication and Vehicular Access - 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from ~_/- street centerline) 33 total feet on Vintaoe Drive (full widening = 66 feet). -J-/ J~~ 44 total feet on Etiwanda Avenue - 2 Comer property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards ~-/- 3 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or ~~- noted on the final map 4 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be qwt-claimed or delineated on the ~-J- final map K. Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (interiorstreets, drainage faaldies, commundytraiis, paseos, landscaped ~~- areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentatroe map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees Pursuant to City Councl Resolution No. 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source 2 ~-J- . of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, ail improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one budding or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buldings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development • ~5~C Protect No SUBTT16867 Comolehon Date • Construct the following perimeter street Improvements including, but not limited to Curb & AC Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trell Island Trail Other Vintage Drive X X X X X Etlwanda Avenue (f) X X X X (e) Notes (a) Median Island includes landscaping and Irrigation on m so markedrs dewaik reconstruction and overlays will be determined durng plan check (c) shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) Entry concept per the Etlwanda Specific Plan Figure 5-12 (f) Cobble curb and gutter Improvement Plans and Construction a Street Improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and Intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, pnor to final map approval or the issuance of budding permits, whichever occurs first. b Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office In adddlon to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the Cdy Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-Inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as spegified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of intersections per Clty Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Exlsttng City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure pennrts are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refundec upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall bE installed to Clty Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards it accordance with the Citys street tree program -~-~- ~~_ ~~- ~~_ ~-~- ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~- _/J- ~~~~ Protect No SUBTTi6867 Completion Date Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet t) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size qty Etiwanda Avenue North of Foothill Boulevard Eucalyptus camaldulensis Red Gum 8 k 30 k o c 5-gal Fill-in Specrfic Plen dictates species despite parkway width Vintage Drive Platanus acenfolia London Plane Tree 8 k 30 tt o c i6-gal Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) Ali street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill sod amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required L. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be fled wdh the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer M. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance wdh the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, andthe Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required poor to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects • r~ LJ ~-~- -~ ~- ~~_ ~~- • 7~ 6 / Protect No SUBTT76867 Completion Date 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any requirements that may be received from them N. General Requirements and Approvals Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid poor to final map approval or poor to bulding permit issuance if no map is involved A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the Ctty, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or poor to building permit issuance if no map is involved Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid forthe Construction and Demolition Droersion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the Ctty Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first bulding permit application is submitted to Bwlding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED ~ / ~-~_ / / 8~~~ Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS November 1, 2005 ETCO Investments Subdivision Vintage West of Etrvvanda Avenue SUBTT16667 and DRC2004-00667 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a The mawmum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential protects is 500 feet No portion of the extenor wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250 feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall rrot exceed 200 feet b Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are i At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industnal or residential proled from the public roadways ii At intersections. iii. On the nght side of the sVeet, whenever practical and possible iv As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire Distract v A minimum of 40 feet from any building. FSC-2 Fire Flow The required fire flow for this protect is 2,000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20.pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appenduc III-A, as adopted by the Fire Distract Ordinances. 2 Public fire hydrants located within a500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subled to Fire Distract review and approval Pnvate fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow ~ ~c ~`1 Firewater plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved 4 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all Fire hydrants located within 600 feet of the proposed proled site FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire Drstnd access roadways include public roads, streets and highways. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Public Water Supply (DomestiGFire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Drstnd and CCWD On the plan, show all exstng fire hydrants within a 600-foot redrus of the proled Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard # 9-6. All required public fire hydrents shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delrvenng any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Frre Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Frre Construction Servrces must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2 Construction Access: The access roads must be paved rn accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Frre Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14 feet 6 inches above the finished surface of the road 3. Fire Flow: A wrrent fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant rs responsible for obtaining the fire flow rnfonnation from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Servrces. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed rn accordance with Frre Construdron Services' 'Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or dnvevray rn accordance with the Crty of Rancho Cucemonga Engineenng Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On pnvate property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location I`J ~'C9O 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed spnnkler contractor, rn the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on- site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hmng the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the regwred . fire flow in accordance vwth the California Frre Code. 3. Fire Access Roadways: Pnor to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance vwth the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Sernces The CC&R's, the reraprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map Nnth provisions that prohibit parfong, speary the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all regwred fire access roadways 4 Address Pnor to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with mirnmum 4mch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be mtemalty or extematly illuminated dunng pencils of dartcness. The numbers shall be visible from the street When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry 5 Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Drstnct "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides _ contact mfortnaUon for Rre Drstnct use m the event of an emergency at the subject building or property Thrs forth must be presented to the Frre Construction Services Inspector I3~C qi • RESOLUTION N0.06-08 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2004-01285 FOR REQUESTS TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM DEPTH OF LOT 10 FROM 200 FEET TO 180 FEET TO ALLOW LOT 11 TO HAVE FRONTAGE ALONG ETIWANDA AVENUE AND TO ALLOW LOT 12 TO ALSO HAVE FRONTAGE ALONG ETIWANDA AVENUEAND A REDUCED MINIMUM WIDTH FROM 90 FEET TO 75 FEET IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (.1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, NORTH OF THE I-210 FREEWAY - APN 0225-171-19. A. Recitals 1. Steve Schapel on behalf of Etco Development, Inc. fled an application for the issuance of Variance DRC2004-01285, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution, m contunction with their application for approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867. Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subtect Variance request is referred to as °the application ° 1. On January 11 and on January 25, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date. • 2. All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public heanng on January 11 and January 25, 2006, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a The application applies to property located west of Etiwanda Avenue, immediately north of the I-210 Freeway, with a street frontage of approximately 302 feet and lot depth of 1,120 feet, and is presently vacant; and b The properties to the north and west are developed with single-family residences, the property to the south consists of the I-210 Freeway, the property to the east is Etiwanda Avenue; and c. The Vanance is related to proposed protect Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 for • 12 parcels, and ~j~CRa- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-08 DRC2004-01285 - ETCO DEVELOPMENT, INC January 25, 2006 Page 2 d The proposed lots range in size from 20,079 to 38,267 square feet, with an average lot size of 25,416 square feet The Etiwanda Specific Plan standard is minimum 20,000 square feet and an average of 25,000 square feet. The properties to the north, east, and west are developed with single-family residences and are approximately 20,000 to 25,000 square feet in lot area e Per Traffic Engineering requirements, the proposed extension of Vintage Dnve will require alignment with Arapaho Road; and f The alignment would reduce the minimum depth of Lot 10 from 200 feet to 180 feet, require Lot 11 to have frontage along Etiwanda Avenue, and would regwre Lot 12 to also have frontage along Etiwanda Avenue and a reduced minimum width from 90 feet to 75 feet. g This development is unique because the property is a remnant parcel of excess right-of-way left over after construction of the I-210 Freeway and Vintage Dnve is one of the few streets in surrounding developments that wdl align with an opposing street (Arapaho Road). The Vintage Dnve alignment with Arapaho Road creates three lots with nonconforming dimensions. • h The property abuts Etiwanda Avenue, classified as a Secondary Street in the General Plan and is approximately 70 feet from the I-210 Freeway; therefore, the protect site is subfect to noise levels that exceed the Citys standards The acoustical analysis indicates the need for sound attenuation walls up to 14 feet, plus acoustic upgrades in the future homes to reduce the noise to acceptable levels i The application proposes the construction of a sound wall up to 14 feet high along • the I-210 Freeway to reduce traffic noise to below City standards for residential. There are existing freeway sound walls up to 16 feet along the I-210 Freeway 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the speafied regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the obtectives of the Development Code b That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or cond~ons applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same distract. c That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprave the applicant of privileges enfoyed by the owners of other properties in the same distract d. That the granting of the Variance wdl not constitute a grant of special pnvdege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. e. That the granting of the Variance wdl not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially infunous to properties or improvements in the vanity. • /~~C93 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-08 DRC2004-01285 - ETCO DEVELOPMENT, INC. January 25, 2006 • Page 3 4 The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the protect identified in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the regwrements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the Gwdelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15305 of the State CEQA Gwdelmes 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below. 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense m the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2) For Lots 10, 11, and 12, the developer shall prowde each prospective buyer wntten disclosure of this Vanance, and that additional Vanances may be necessary to develop these lots. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JANUARY 2006. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST: Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of January 2006, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES COMMISSIONERS: NOES. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT• COMMISSIONERS' ~g~c9y t,~~ i ~~~ - ~~» ~a_a s:~~ T H E C I T Y O F :~ ac t RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE January 25, 2006 TO' Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM• Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner BY Michael Diaz, Senior Planner SUBJECT. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST TO INITIATE DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2005-01083 - SAHGA GROUP - A request to amend Table 17.32.030 -Use of Regulations for Foothill Boulevard Districts of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, adding Thrift Stores as a conditionally permitted use in Subarea 2 of the Community Commercial Districts, located along Foothill Boulevard between Cucamonga Creek and Heilman Avenue BACKGROUND. When the Foothill Boulevard Specific Pian (now known as Chapter 17 32 of Development Plan) was drafted, a conscious decision was made not to allow theft stores The decision makers felt that the use was not the type they desired to see along our primary commercial corridor Therefore, currently, Table 17.32.030 -Use of Regulations for Foothill Boulevard Distracts of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, does not list theft shops as a permitted or conditionally permitted use in any of the Foothill Boulevard districts. On January 5, 2000, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 619 establishing new definitions for "theft store," "second-hand store," "antique shop," and "pawn shop " The new definitions recognize the unique differences between various types of uses that many people lump together as a "thrift store." Ordinance No 619 also revised whether these uses were allowed in the Neighborhood Commercial and General Commercial zones, however, did not change the regulations prohibiting these uses along Foothill Boulevard The proposed change would affect ail properties zoned Community Commercial within Subarea 2 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts being defined as the properties fronting Foothill Boulevard between Cucamonga Creek and Hellman Avenue (Exhibit B) Most of the properties in Subarea 2 are developed, a number of which are older, small scale multi-tenant retail centers The proposed request to initiate a change to the Development Code is being made in hopes of facilitating the development of a Goodwill Industries store and donation center in the commercial center at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue Staff has also received an inquiry about potential thrift stores or second-hand stores in Subarea 3 at Foothill Boulevard and Hellman Avenue Item D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-01083 - SAHGA GROUP January 25, 2006 Page 2 . In 2003, Goodwill Industries submitted a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application for a store within the shopping at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Base Line Road (Albertson's Center) The proposal met with public opposition and was eventually denied by the Planning Commission Although the deasion was appealed to the City Council, the applicant chose to withdraw their application. During the debate regarding the 2003 Goodwill proposal, they were informed to find a more suitable location Some of the previously raised issues regarding the thrift stores ranged from the potential increase in criminal activity to dumping ANALYSIS Amending Table 17 32 030 -Use Regulations for Foothill Boulevard Districts to add thrftt stores in Subarea 2 of the Community Commercial Districts could possibly lead to other requests for such uses along Foothill Boulevard Although the antiapated theft store for the applicant's site represents the high-end of thrift stores, there is no guarantee that all such requests will be so Thus, if thrift stores are added to the list of uses, staff recommends that they be allowed only subtect to the approval of a CUP consistent with atywide zoning regulations The CUP process allows the City to review requests on a case by case basis and to grant approval only after conducting a public hearing, where all the findings can be made and impose a sufficient number of operating conditions to ensure that the use is compatible with other surrounding properties and/or uses. In addition to general zoning and/or development requirements, specific key factors affecting the City's decision on a CUP request would be the consideration of how a store will be managed (e.g , hours, sufficient number of personnel, etc ), how donated items are collected and . displayed, and whether the site and/or center was developed with adequate trash facilities and vehicular arculation The CUP process would apply to all new thrift store applications and would be a regwrement for any existing thrift shop (with or without an existing CUP) seeking to expand and or otherwise significantly alter the use of the existing operation. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends initiating the requested Development Code Amendment Re ec Ily submitte , oleman Acting City Planner DC MD/ge Attachment Exhibit A -Letter from Goodwill to Dan Coleman dated December 12, 2005 Exhibit B -Map of Foothill Distract Subarea 2 Exhibit C -Land Use Defindions D-a- ~l nGn Finn,Nm 11(lN(u<nip <; HAIR ~r)nRll UI QOV4xNhR~ (BOARD OP DIRPI IU0.\ , r)FFIfFnS (,IlniR ~ nrnr. PFnce, n FnHf 7nVtnnlrn/ (arPnrgnon FlRr,'va r n urx nargd MCQunry Pnmmovn! lHdure, mrpr,mllnn }PtnNl1 \'RF (,RAIN )nmrt u fncdno I RFwumrR Mnrpan In Il /nAn 5F(,nrTnnr barGrri MUAIInn f ormm~nl¢ Polrmlm A.NIC<nNl 51 rllFrMrv IJen Ofrrru ,lln/.er NA'In fap,hrl Pxr}nrrNT r CE(> nnvp(na N flnry, MAW CNIFF C11•ilUTIN~ (JrrlrnR Mmk,UmaGln I I ~ ~ S O IJ T H EI R N C n L n F O R N i A December 12, 2005 Mr Dan Coleman Acting City Planner 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 RE Development Code Amendment for Goodwill Store and donation Center Dear Mr Coleman, VIA FedEx I am wnhng to provide you with information on Goodwill's store operations to and in the completion of the application for a Development Code Amendment filed by Sahga Group regarding their protect located at the southwest comer of Vineyard and Foothill Boulevard in Rancho Cucamonga Goodwill Industries is comprised of more than 180 autonomous agencies through out the United States. Goodwill Industries of Southern California successfully runs 45 retail stares in Los Angeles, San Bernardino, and Riverside Counties in addition to the information listed below, I am enclosing Some photographs of some of stores that represent our store operations. • Proposed Use: Goodwill Retail Stores sell high-quality donated apparel, household goods, and small appliances in a first class retail setting Merchandise mix and presentation are similar to that found in other fine retailers such as Target and Mervyns. The store is organized for efficient collection of donated goods from the general public • Compatibility Approximately half of our stores are located in neighborhood shopping centers where our co-tenants include a variety of national and regional chains such as Dollar Tree, 5kechers, Pep Boys, Rent-a-Center, Rite Aid, Kragen Auto, 24 Hour Fitness, Smart and Final, Walgreens, Dulux Paints, Voris, Payless Shoes, Bank of America, Stater Bros ,and 99 Cent Only Stores • Hours of Operation: The store will be open for business from 9 00 A M until B 00 PM, Monday through Saturday and 10:00 AM until 7.00 PM on Sunday Staff will be present in the store for approximately one hour prior to opening until one hour after closing each day • Number Of Employees: This store of will employ 12 to 15 full time people with the matonty of employees working the afternoon hours • 342 N San Fernando Road • Los Angeles, CA 90031 ~23) 223,1271 • FAx (323) 343-997.7 • www goodwdlsocal org Serving the Counties of I_os An`galea, Riverside and Sen Bernardino E~~O~~ 1 • As you can see from our photos we take pride m our stores, and decisive measures are taken to ensure that our stores and the areas surrounding are stores are kept clean and customer friendly Aker you have had an opportunity to rewew the photographs and information, please feel free to call me wdh any questions you have It would be a pleasure to meet with you at your convenience to discuss our operations and commitment to excellence Iwy direct Ime is (323) 539-2001 Sincerely, ~~~~~ Terry eda Director of Real Estate cc Craig Smith Encls • • D-~ m 2 00 ~T W ~Q~ SUBAREA 2 San Bernardino Rd Q s 0 A O 00 A n O F1. J W~ N mI~ W N O Footlilll Blvd LEGEND RESIDENTIAL LR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LMR LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL MR MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL MHR MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL SN.. ~.. i'.yS gp2~4~~ .~ ~. ~~~ ~ ~~,''TTSSo 0 ~ e e ea o °o a~~ j f O ~ 0 0 0 oO^ ~~~~~opan~ '"`~70onp~~ °~00~3 ~3~~ °~o ~Q~ C~~QUu~LJo~-~~~tJo~iLi^o~~00~ ° c m E N COMMERCIAL OFFICE PUBLIC SC SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL MU MIXED USE U UTILITY CC COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL O OFFICE P PUBLIC RRG REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL CO COMMERCIAUOFFICE ~~ MASTER PLAN AREA INDUSTRIAL DUSTRIAL T I N LI LIGH LAND USE PLAN m ti O .., v w N O DD O Ordinance No 619 rage 4 DEVELOPbtEYT CODE AMENDMENT 99-OS Secrron 17.0? 1 ~0 - Defrnrtrons, should be amended ro add the jollo}ving land use definrrroas Thrift Store - A retail store offering used clothing, furniture, household appliances, and similar merchandise which is in good repay, provided (1) alt clothes are displayed on racks, folded on shelves or tables, or in some organized fashion, as distinguished from being displayed in heaps or piles, (2) no merchandise shall be accepted on consignment, and (3) merchandise requires no cleaning, repair, assembly, or refurbishment before It can be worn or put to normal use The ma/only of merchandise offered for sale shall be donated; however, all collection and storage shall be conducted inside the building. Second-hand Store - A retail store or resaler offering used clothes, furniture, household appliances, and similar merchandise, provided; (1) clothes may be displayed in heaps or piles, as distinguished from racks or folded on shelves or tables, (2) merchandise may be accepted on sale for consignment, and {3) offers used materials or goods for sale that regwres cleaning, repair, assembly or refurbishment before rt can be worn or put to normal use Merchandise may be donated, however, all collection and storage shall be conducted inside the building Antique Shop - A retail store offering antique clothes, jewelry, furniture, household • appliances, punted materials, art, and similar merchandise, provided not more than 10 percent of the merchandise or 10 percent of the floor area rs devoted to the sale of collectibles, new merchandise, or simulated antiques "Antique" shall mean anything very old, or the like, made at a much earlier period than the present, generally more than 50 years ago, and which, because of age, rarity, or historical signdicance, has a monetary value greater than the original value Pawn Shop - A pawnbroker or other shop engaged in the business of receiving tangible personal property, new or used, in pledge as security for a loan Tangible personal property does not include toms, monetized bullion, or commeraal ingots of precious metals Secrron /7 /0 030 -Use Regu/arrons, Tab/e /7 !0 030 Use Regu/aeons jur Conunercral/Office Drsrrrcrs, should be amended as follows Use Office Professional Zone Neighborhood Commercial Zone General Commercial Zone Antique Shop - Permitted Permuted Pawn Shops - - CUP Second-hand Store - CUP P Thrift Store - C P t. J EXHIBIT C ~-~ . ~~., 's ` • x T H E C I T Y O F R A N G II O C O C A M O N C A Staff Repoli DATE January 25,2006 Td Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner SUBJECT REVIEW OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00850 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES/AIM ALL STORAGE - A review of the construction and operation of an existing Alm All public storage faality on 6 13 acres In the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and the east 210 Freeway on-ramp The purpose of this review is to ensure that it is being operated in a manner consistent with = conditions of approval or in a manner which is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially infurious to properties in the vicinity pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17 04.035 G.2 - APN 1076-331-02 and 1076-341-01. Related file: Variance DRC2004-00050 ABSTRACT• The purpose of tonight's meeting is for the Planning Commission to determine if there Is "sufficient evidence to warrant a full examination° of the Conditional Use Permit for Aim All Storage If so, a public hearing will be scheduled and all parties duly noticed Staff would then conduct a full investigation and present their findings in a report to the Commission BACKGROUND On November 19, 2003, the City Council approved Development Code Amendment DRC2003-00706 (Ordinance No 719) allowing public storage facilities within residential zones subject to a Conditional Use Permit. This code amendment was initiated on behalf of Aim All Storage's desire to locate on this property On April 28, 2004 the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00850 for this Alm All Storage protect and the related Variance DRC2004-00050 to reduce the setback from 20 feet to 0 feet along the east boundary abutting the neighboring homes. A series of neighborhood meetings had been conducted by the applicant during the review process. ANALYSIS Four residents have requested that the Planning Commisslon review this Conditional Use Permit for the Aim All Storage project at Haven Avenue and the 210 Freeway One resident, Mrs. Eileen Crowl, testified at the September 21, 2005 City Council meeting regarding her concerns with this Aim All Storage and opposed allowing another public storage project near residences Mrs. Crowl presented photographs of this Alm All Storage (Exhibit E). At the request of City Councilman Rex Gutierrez, staff presented an update to the City Council on November 16, 2005, regarding the status of resolving residents concerns (Exhibit F). Staff • presented five unresolved issues. Item E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-00850 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES January 25, 2006 Page 2 • 1 Freeway Noise -The residents want the sound wall the same height as that bwlt by Caltrans, extended to connect to the new Aim All Storage Bwlding B The residents stated that they were told by the developer at a neighborhood meeting in May 2004 that the sound wall would be completed On December 20, 2005, staff interviewed the applicant, Mr Charles Buquet, Charles Joseph Associates, who confirmed that the sound wall was to be continued at full height to connect with Bwlding B Mr Buquet indicated that regardless of any noise study there was a commitment made by the developer to complete the freeway sound wall The noise study indicated that a sound wall was not necessary. The plans presented to the Planning Commission, and approved, indicate an 8 foot high wall which is what was bwlt to connect from the end of the Caltrans freeway sound wall to Bwlding B On January 11, 2006, staff met with Aim All Storage to discuss extending the freeway sound wall at full height Aim All Storage indicates that their structural engineer is already in the proess of designing it (Exhibit I) Code Enforcement is scheduled to measure noise levels during the weeks of January 9 and 16 and staff will give an oral update at the meeting on the test results 2. Security -Residents are concerned that the perimeter wall and gap(s) in said wall are not sufficient to keep someone from entering into the Aim All Storage protect and then gaining access to their rear yards. The gaps have since been filled. On December 24, 2005 a burglar broke into Aim All Storage wa the front gate on Haven Avenue 3 Lighting Glare -Residents have requested that lights be turned off or shielded The lights are directly visible from their second floor windows. The glare from the lights affects then rear yard and windows on both floors. No light level measurements have been submitted Staff has inspected the lighting on a half-dozen occasions over the last six months. At staff's request, Aim All Storage had turned off the malonty of lights, including those along the east-west bwldings; however, after the Christmas Eve burglary these were turned back on to enhance security. The reduced lighting levels in combination with the repainting of Bwiding B from white to a tan color, has signrficantly improved the lighting situation Aim All has temporarily put black tape on the light fixtures and has been waiting for response from residents as to its effectiveness On January 11, 2006, staff met with Aim All Storage to discuss permanently "blacking out" the sides of light fixtures that face residents homes In a follow-up letter, Aim All indicates that they have removed every other light bulb and painted the lenses black to direct lighting downward Code Enforcement is scheduled to measure lighting levels the week of January 16 and staff will give an oral update at the meeting on the test results. 4. Sunlight glare on white rooftops of 1-story storage bwldings -Residents requested that roofs be painted a darker color These roofs are white metal The rooftops are directly visible from their second floor windows. On December 20, 2005, staff interviewed the applicant, Mr. Charles Joseph Buquet, who stated that the color of the roofs was discussed at neighborhood meetings and were not intended to be _ white. The plans presented to the Planning Commission, and approved, list 'Galvalume' as the color. On January 11, 2006, staff met with Aim All Storage to . discuss painting those roofs, which are closest to residents, a darker color. As an G- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-00850 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES January 25, 2006 Page 3 alternative, we also discussed installing reflective "mirrored" windows or coating on neighbor's west (rear) elevations In their January 16 letter, Aim All indicates that they spoke with Mrs Crowl (Exhibit I) and offered to tint her windows and install a solar screen, they are awaiting a response. 5 Noise of rainfall on metal rooftops -Following an intense storm, residents complained of noise emanating from rain falling onto metal roofs Building G abuts their backyards Residents requested that a different roof material be used The plans presented to the Planning Commission, and approved, indicate that roof material was to be "UltraDek" or equal with a "Galvalume" finish. UltraDek is a standing seam metal roofing product Although staff has visited the site on numerous occasions, none were during rainstorms Last October Rancho Cucamonga was hit by a heavy storm During heavy rainfall, because there will be noticeable noise as rain falls on a variety of surfaces, such as pavement and roofs, including the roofs of homes in the neighborhood, pools, and concrete patio and pool deck surfaces, there is no practical way to measure rain noise from metal roofs of storage bwldings The Bwiding Offiaal researched potential finishes or materials that may be applied to metal roofs of storage bwldings Generally, there are two choices: 1) insulation, such as sprayed-on polyurethane expanding foam, or 2j weatherproofing, such as sprayed-on rubberized coatings None of the manufacturers or installers contacted had any data on the noise reduction characteristics of these products CORRESPONDENCE Although tonight's meeting is not an advertised public hearing, staff encouraged public partiapation by marling notices to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the Aim All Storage site. RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine through minute action that suffiaent evidence exists to warrant a full investigation by staff and noticing a public hearing to review the Conditional Use Permit and consider possible modification or revocation However, in light of Aim All Storage's commitment to continue working with neighbors to resolve these issues, staff recommends that the hearing not be scheduled for at Attachments Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibd C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Location Map Approved Site Plan Letter from Gordon & Eileen Crowi Letter from Steve & June Selos Letter from William Bissell (attorney for Aim All Storage) Photographs Copy of Staff Presentation to Council on Nov 16, 2005 Resolution of Approval No 04-48 and conditions of approval Letter from Aim All Storage dated January 16, 2006 ~~ Acting City Planner ~~ ~o o ._ ~~ ~~ _ ;~ ._ a 0 E~ Q 0 0 M EXHIBIT A ~~ ~' ~T W xor~vw~ ~_ ~~ e ® ~ ~.... ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ti ~r~ ~s. aioo s PREL noa r s~na •• aioo eioov 10~lOI000OCQ71117. II 11 I 'I II ~ I I i 1Fi1116P IMINARY MASTER PLAN AIM ALL SELF STORAGE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONC,4 ~~ __.~--_'y ~.. a .. ® ~~ ___._ ~~ • N00 {1101 e .,~. , ~~ r~Al -`fin ND= ..~, ' ~- - - - ~ _ _ - _ POOLl •pYK - - i 1 ~jpPlp ~' ~ ,~ r. - - lNOS ~ AT6T T' 6 _-_ ~ i/ "_ ~ e . ~ - IOJJ.' Y .~>5 . ~ `i tc 1 z~~`/~.:.f..4 tsi Sbri t`ir`~a`s^~:: 6 ~~_flY}.ri' a _ '~~ `; < ~rr,; '~., t>~`' ~~/i ~ it __~ n ~tratx>vumaxbww5/ ~ . x•~a wei anne ~ ~ - ~, " 116]5 `M1 .-_ \~ 8 \ _~~~~ ~~ LJ 9 I lv"Y~ ~ \ / Y1 A -- ~~ ~~ BLDG + ~ , , 1.65 , ~~ , _ . p _ ~~ to rsrogr .~ _ ~ u6~ 6 / 1 ~/ i f 3 +T66Il \~~ ~/ ^ _11616 +lf6T 1 _ 8 __ ~ a4 Ifbl J ~ ~ _ , - R +fbo ~ o a 1 u561 I S' 6 5' I 6~ ~ - + 1156 z ET YOPC BJiK p k7 Ufd1IY O 70= 46 0 > P,4D= 463 o PAD= 46 E ~ ~T rs rr ~~ ~ -- ---- ~aaux PeoL I ssu vwxon n cram b0 VAl1xDA R smm ~. usso vwxon i R scam ~..TO ~ ~ i 6510 vwxon n amm w vnuxon a cram ~o vwxon n emrm p YwNDA aim 6610 Vwxw } IlI6J I _J 6510 VwxDn ~~ 11 I •I I I+1 T IN91 1~A5 ~~ • IiTTS ~ \1~ // /-~i~ ~ --~_C >% ' /~69 J J~ ~'~{ `i =I i _._..,._ Dan Coleman Rancho Cucamonga Planning Dept PO Box 807 • Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91729 Wednesday November 2, 2005 CITY OF Rhi~CnC CUCAMONGA hOV 0 "r 2005 Dear Mr Coleman and the Planning Dept Gordon 8 Eileen Crowl 6550 Valmda Ave Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 I am venting to ask the Planning Commision to review the conditional use permit for the property at 6599 Haven Ave, specifically Aim All Storage I am representing the residents of the 6542-6610 block on Valmda Ave, in Rancho Cucamonga The reason for this request is that we the residents of Valmda Ave feei that the protect has not lived up to the promises made in the planning stages I will try to state the most important points of contain and give background as to why these are still concems In November 2002 the 210 freeway was completed through Rancho Cucamonga, at this time a sound wall was constructed along the Haven East bound on ramp This wall encompasses the entire back yard of 6542 Valmda and extends 50 feet west into the then empty field of 6599 Haven The neighbors and I contacted Cal Trans SanBag and the City of Rancho Cucamonga about the fact that the chain link fence along the on-ramp was still very noisy in our adtacent back yards and a safety issue We were told that the developer of the property would complete the sound wall Here is the first issue, complete means to continue in the same manner as the existing Thus, we have since 2002 been expecting any development on that empty lotto "complete" the existing sound wall This will effectively block the remaining sound problem that is being protected into our bedrooms and back yards In November 2003, we (the representatives for the Valmda Ave block) attended a city councl session where a vote was being taken to change the zone of 6599 Haven from single family residential to a conditional use permit for a storage facility We voiced strong concems that this change would negatwely affect the current single family neighborhood which had been m existence since 1979 When the vote was being taken one member of the Gty councl made the comment that "this area is not suitable for single family living" We who live here took this as a slap m the face and pointed out that a similar piece of land at the North-East comer of Milliken and the 210 had lust been developed as single family homes in the selling range of $500,000 Against our wishes the city council adopted the code amendment and proceeded to send the protect to planning I attended another meeting, (I am sorry but the date is not recopied except m my memory) this meeting was held at the Water Distnct bwidmg Chuck Bouquet, Mike Gwrbino and Mike Tonney were representing Aim All and June Selos, Tnna Stone and Eileen Crowl representing the residents of Valmda Ave Some blue pnnts were shown and discussion took place about certain aspects of the protect June, Tnna and I were then taken to the foyer v~nth Chuck, Mike and Mike We talked for a very long time about noise concems, elevation concems, landscaping concems and the effect the protect as a whole would have on our quality of I~fe At this time these men seemed very reasonable and assured us that all of our concems would be addressed and that Aim All was stnwng to be a good neighbor In May 2004, a neighborhood meeting was finally scheduled This was held at the Lions Center East The Stone family, Selos family, Moore family and Crowl family represented the 9 affected houses on Valmda Ave and 3 families from the affected Heather St were represented Mike . Gwrbino, Mike Tormey representing Aim All and a woman representing the City of Rancho Cucamonga were present for this meeting At this-meeting we were shown some plans and had the floor opened to concems and questions After the meeting we were assured there would be EXHIBIT C '~~ _ another meeting where all the concerns would be addressed and we could see the finalized plans This second meeting never happened and construction began in July 2004 At the Lions Center meeting the following concerns were voiced and are still issues of concem for the neighbors • 1 Mr Stone, Mr Selos and Mr Crowl asked to see spec elevations concerning construction 2 Mr Crowl and Mr Selos asked if the Cal Trans sound wall was going to be completed 3 Mrs Crowl and Mrs Selos asked about the corrugated roofing expressing concem that the roofing matenal would cause a lot of glare and noise 4 Mr Moore asked about the height of the bwldmgs that would be behind his home 5 Mrs Stone and Mrs Crowl asked about landscaping or other types of beautification plans to make the look more compatible to what would be in a single family neighborhood 6 Mr Moore and Mrs Crowl asked about the lighting and how much lighting would be required and the effect it would have on their back yards 7 Mrs Crowl asked why the bwldmgs were shown painted pink on the punts, since pink walls were not compatible with the current homes 8 We asked about the hours of business and the city representative said the hours would be closed at 7PM 9 We asked about traffic problems because the light at 19"' and Haven is a no U-turn and there is no access to Aim All for south bound traffic bepuse of a median down Haven Ave Mr Stone was very concerned about the "emergency" entrance to the building off Heather and directly behind his home The following were the answers we were given by Aim All and the city representative There will be another meeting and specific elevabons vnll be available This meeting never happened and in July 2004 construction started without addressing the above concerns These elevation concerns have caused the Moore family to have a tall addition to their existing wall without a permit The lack of elevation plans caused Aim All to be allowed to install a sloping concrete wall along the south ends of the property butting up to the Stone's back yard Currently all walls on slopes in Rancho Cucamonga and specifically our neighborhood are terraced walls, the effect of this sloped wall behind the Stone's terraced wall is one of vertigo If you walk out into the Stone's back yard you fell like you-have ~ust had way too much to dunk A similar wall is being built along Haven Ave South of 19' and it is being terraced, so our question is," why was this wall allowed to be sloped causing . such an eyesore in the Stone's yard" C o 2 We were told at the mee~ing a sound wall would be completed at the North end of the site and that the reason for the two-story budding at the North end was to comply with sound requirements As of date, the Cal Trans sound wall has not been completed and an 8 foot terzaced garden wall is at the open North side of the site bordenng the on ramp of the 210 . freeway A large gap has been left between the "garden wall" and the sound wall and an unsightly chain link fence still borders the North side of the Aim All buildings A complete sound wall to our understanding meant the area in question would be completely blocked off from sound of the freeway and on ramp This is not the case and as of date I have been told that Aim Ali was only required to put up the 8 foot wall because a sound study showed there were no residents in the Aim All center affected by the freeway Excuse me, but we are back to the old statement that our area is not swtable for single family Irving, because those of us who have backyards and bedrooms facing that gap still are affected by the sound and lights and have never had a sound study done in our back yards The appropnate measure would be to complete (in the full sense of the meaning) the current Cal Trans sound wall the remaining 20 feet thus effectively blocking off the gap by the on ramp Currently plans are to close part of the gap, in the wall with wrought iron This will keep the people from coming through the gap but doesn't solve the sound problem To date since the "garden wall" has been completed, we have seen people walk through the gap between that wall and the Cal Trans wall, walk along the elevated landscaped area, hop up onto our neighbor's wall and walk all the way down to the south end of Valmda Ave along our back yards Our neighbor at 6538 Valmda had their home broken into several weeks ago and it is believed that the thief's came through the gap and over the wall into her back yard, entenng though a back window This sound wall issue has been a mayor concern and source of imtation since November 2002, Mr Crowl and Mr Selos stopped fighting the intrusion of a storage umt in our single family neighborhood when they were assured the sound wall would be completed Both of these men claim the plans they were shown onginally showed the two story budding extending the entire length of the North end of the property thus closing the said gap They both feel stabbed in the back, as do the rest of the neighbors 3 We were assured that the corrugated roofing would not glare or cause excesswe noise and were told that all elevations were below our walls so this would not be an issue Mrs Crowl pointed out that her home's elevation was well above the existing garden wall because it is a to-level I was told the roofing matenal would not glare Mr Moore has a similar problem with bedroom windows and was again told the matenal would not glare or cause excessroe noise dunng the ram To date, the spnng sun glares so unbearable off the corrugated roofs that we cannot go into our back yard and have to close all the shades in the back of the house dunng the day (not when the sun is in the west ,but when it is in the south-east) to stop the oppressive glare To date two rainstorms have occurred since completion and we thought it was hailing until we went to our front yard and saw that it was only lightly raining Thus the roofing problem has not been taken care of I specifically asked at the meeting to have a different color roof or painted roof and was told that would not be necessary Please come to my home some mid-afternoon as did, Rex Gutierrez, Sam Spagnola and Merry Westerlin and be convinced we are up against oppressive glare Something needs to be done to the roofs at Aim All Storage 4 Mr Moore was told the height of the buildings would all be below our existing garden walls with the exception of a few places at 3 feet or less above our walls Mr Moore at 6600 Valmda Ave, now has an additional ten feet added to his garden wall to cover the heights of the buildings behind his home We were told before construction started an elevation plan would be shown to the neighbors This was never done At this Ume I believe Meny Westerlin is working v~nth Mr Moore concerning the added wall and I hope this issue vnll not have to be addressed again 5 The Stones and the Crowl's asked for some sort of landscaping comdor to give us a more "single family" feel to the storage facility We were told we would not see the storage umt G~ because it was being dredged 9 feet lower than the existing field, so landscaping would not be needed because we would not see the faality Well, from our homes all we see are corrugated roofs, corrugated doors, concrete walls and dnveways and at night the whole thing is lit up like a Chnstmas tree Many of the lights have since been fumed down but there is still a light glare issue (see point 6) and there it is not a very nice sight behind our • homes A few trees and canes would have helped tremendously Currently building up our garden walls a few feet and allowing us to plant vines etc, along the elevated walls would be a compatible solution 6 The neighbors were very concerned about the amount of light the storage facility would have on at night Mr Tormey told us all the lights would be motion sensored and the camera infrared eliminating the need for lights all night long When the facility was close to finish, every light in the facility was on from dark to sunnse and we felt like we lived in the middle of a Wal-Mart parking lot The lights along the two east/west running comdors were fumed off and that helped immensely However all the West facing lights along the East buildings butting up to our yards have been left on In September 2005 I contacted the city and with Meny Westerlin's help all the west facing lights on those bwlding except for a few in the middle were fumed off This was a huge improvement Also, as a result of that meeting the huge white walls facing east were painted a darker color, thus they no longer reflect the moon and existing lights However, a day after the painting was completed the lights along those wall (the west facng lights on the East wall that butts up to our backyard) were fumed back on and thus I have an industnal glow again Thank you for painting the wall, now please turn the lights back off so we don't feel stabbed in the back and like we are living in a Catch 22 (i a ,solve one concern but renege on one that was fixed pnor) Please install the motion lights or shield and lower the wattage of the other lights that need to remain on, but do turn off the ones that face the two huge fagade walls 7 This issue is presented lust to show how we feel like we were stabbed in the back We . were told that the pink walls were lust the artist's rendition and when the final plans were shown to us the color would be changed and in fact the wall would not be painted pink Case in point, the walls are in fact painted PINKS Can I live with this Yes, but it is lust another imtation in the overall imtation at the way this protect has been handled 8 When Aim All opened for business it was open 24hours~ Our September meeting with Merty Westerlin was supposed to correct this problem 9 Traffic would not be a problem we were told Well, to date 19"' and Haven ~s not a U-turn so customers turn left onto 19"' and then left onto Valinda and make a U-turn on Valinda My daughter was almost hit by a car toHnng a trader, who made the U-turn while she was waiting to turn nght off Valinda onto 19"' Hillside community church every Sunday runs their vans through our neighborhood to turn around and enter the faality Last Sunday I did not see any Hillside vans, so Merry may have corrected that problem The left turn lane at 191h and Haven is being expanded so that solves another traffic issue, however the customers U-fuming on Valinda or traveling around or neighborhood is still a problem and customers using the "emergency° entrance has been a problem Rex Gutierrez was here one day when a customer was unloading at the "emergency" entrance, an area we were assured would not be used by Aim All Customers I think 19'h at Haven needs to be a U- tum or a left turn lanes needs to be installed in the median by the Aim All dnveway on south bound Haven The "emergency' entrance is also another unsightly piece of work The dnve way slopes to the east and has a crooked fence at the entrance giving the effect of another drunken piece of construction 4 ~~ Please help the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga, specifically the Valinda Ave residents directly affected by this wnstruction I can be contacted at 909-989-9699 and I am willing to allow interested parties into my yard if they are wailing to help us fix the current frustrations Thank you for your time, Sincerely, _~, ~.~ ~~ ~ordon & Edeer~'~ or the residen of 6600-6538 Valinda Ave v _ i C 5 ~ ~r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dan Coleman Rancho Cucamonga Planning Dept PO Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Sunday November 6, 2005 NOV 0 7 2005 RFf Fhl~r, - Pi_APINING Dear Mr Coleman and the Planning Dept Steve & June Solos 6542 Valmda Ave Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 We are witting to ask the Planning Comm~ss~on to review the conditional use permit for the property at 6599 Haven Ave ,called .Aim All Storage I live at 65 2 Valmda Ave and my home and back yazd are directly affected by this protect The reason for my request is that we do not feel the promises made to us dunng the planning stages of the protect have been followed through with To begin with, m 2001 and 2002 our back yard was invaded by CalTrans and the construd~on of the 210 freeway W e had to endure the construction of a 20 foot tall sound wall along our North facing property causing us to lose our view of the mountains. When the freeway was complete the mvas~ve sound wall only continued 30 feet past our property line along the Haven on ramp to the 210 East My enure West facing yard was open to the noise of the on-ramp and freeway and lights from the off ramp My neighbor contacted CalTrans and was told the sound wall would be completed by the developer of the property at 6599 Haven Ave In November 2003, my neighbor Eileen Crowl and I, attended at City Council meeting where a conditional use permit was being considered for the Haven property This permit would change the single family zone to a conditional permit for a storage facility My neighbor and I strongly opposed this zone change and unfortunately our opinions were overruled and the city changed the zone Later we attended another meeting concerning the proposed construction of.Aim All Storage at the Haven property After the meeting Chuck Bouquet, Mike Cnurbino and Mike Tonney representing Aim All Storage assured Eileen Crowl, Tnna Stone and me (representing the nine affected families on Valmda Ave) that the construction would be in keeping with a single family home feeling We were assured that the sound wall would be completed as part of the protect, this was one of Steve Selos's main concerns, and that the completed project would not be mtrusroe In May 2004, a neighborhood meeting was scheduled This was held at the Lions Center East Our neighbors, the Stone's, the Crowl's, the Moore's and Steve and I attended this meeting as well as neighbors from Heather St Mike Cnurbino, Mike Tonney were present representing Aim All Storage and a women was present representing the City of Rancho Cucamonga At this meeting Steve and I asked many questions concerning the protect and asked to see blue pnnts and elevations of the protect Steve specifically asked about the current sound wall and plans to finish the sound wall I asked about the noise and what I could be expected to see from my back garden and kitchen windows • • EXHIBIT D c_~~ . At the meeting at Lions Center East Steve and Mr Crowl were assured that the sound wall would be complete and the plans looked like the wall would be incorporated into the two story building that would be right to our property Ime We were told that the sound sttuat~on would be taken care of and specific plans would be shown to us at the next meeting This next meeting never took place and construction began m July 2004 At the meeting I was told that the sound from the freeway would be taken care of by the completion of the protect I was told that my back garden view would not be affected and I would be pleased with the completed protect When the Storage Facility opened in 2005 the sound wall was not complete and an eight foot terraced garden wall is m that area Not only is the wall not the same height as the CalTrans wall, rt does not butt up to the CalTrans wall leaving a large gap, that students and any person who desired can walk right through, across the elevated landscaping at that point and nght into my back yard We still get all the noise and view of the freeway that we had before the protect was complete because this unfinished area ~s right behind my back garden We would like to see the sound wall completed to the same height and butting up to the current CalTrans wall and extending the enure length and width of the azea between the CalTrans wall and the ?um All two story building The unsightly chain link fence (which we were told was temporary) needs to be removed along the freeway on-ramp My view from the back garden ~s not what I was told it would be When the protect finished there were two large move screen size white walls stanng at me and to top it off • they were lighted all night long In September 2005, Merry Westerlin worked with Eileen Crowl and I to get the lights turned off This helped Then In October 2005 the white wall were painted and the glare was taken care of, but lust as we were going to thank Aim All and the City, the fights were turned back on and we still have an industrial glaze all night long in our back garden We want the I~ghts turned back off The Aim All Storage Facility has now blocked my entire Western side of my home and garden while the CalTrans wall has blocked my entire North side of my home and garden Our backyard now feels like a prison blocked in by walls on all sides This was not in keeping with a conditional use penmt allowing storage facilities that would blend m with the existing neighborhood Instead my neighborhood has the feeling of being Invaded by a lazge industry with many lights and corrugated steel roofs and doors stanng me all the Ume As a long time resident of Rancho Cucamonga, since 1989, we feel that the city can help solve and improve the situation concerning Aim All Storage that is causing a lot of frustration and anger to our family and the neighbors Thank you for considering our request We can be reached at 909-945-3685 to answer any questions concerntg the things that I feel need to be corrected Sincerely, /.-1 ~ -~ ,, ^ S . Steve & June Selos ~~I' / V"`~~ G-13 WILLIAM G BISSELL ATTORNEY AT LAW IIO NEWPORT CENTER ORIVE SUITE 200 NEWPORT 9EAGM, CALIFORNIA 92680 • TELEPHONE (94fl1 %Ifl-1159 ~^ TELEFA% 19<91 ]19'1158 pF ~P~C~p GpGPMpN 11 November 14, 2005 G~~ 15 Zp~a NpV The City of Rancho Cucamonga R~C~\vEp , p~PNN~NG Planning Department Attn: Dan Coleman Acting City Planner 10550 Civrc Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Re: Aim All Storage 210 /CUP DRC2003-00850 Deaz: Mr. Coleman: Aim All Storage 210 (Aim All), the owner under City of Rancho Cucamonga Condttronal Use Permit DRC 2003-00850 has asked this office to respond to your November 3, 20051etter to Aim All as well as address some of the comments contained in the letters of Gordon and Eileen Crowl and Steve and June Selos to you dated November 2°" and 6'" 2005 respectively. In your letter you • state "Throughout the Crty's discussions wtth Aim All, both yourself and Mtke Tormey, we have stressed the Importance ofAtm All berng a good neighbor. " It is the position of Aun All that from its eazliest involvement m this project it has gone the extra mile in taking the reasonable and legitimate concerns of its neighbors into consideration beginning with the design of the facility , extending into the construction process and more recently, the operation. Consistent with its ongoing efforts to be a good neighbor Aim All continues to take the concerns of the residents in the vicinity of its facility to heart. This is evidenced not only by Aim All operating a clean, attractrve, well maintained, well managed and safe self storage facility, but also by Aim All going substantially beyond the requirements of its"conditional use permit and at no small cost to itself, and modifying aspects of its facility or operation which although having received full City approval have nontheless been the subject of complaints by a small minority of its neighbors. Specifically Aim All has agreed to: 1. Repaint two lazge walls of its facility from the Crty approved white, to a color which has less light reflecting properties. 2. Reduce the hours of its operations on the site to between 7:00 am and 7:00 pm. 3. At the City's insistence Aim All has (at least temporarily, pending comment from the City Fire Department) substantially reduced the lighting in its facility to appease what Aim All understands to be two complaining neighbors. It is worth noting that the City has • EXHIBIT E ~a~ Dan Coleman Nov. 14, 2005 Page 2 insisted on this concession from Aim All despite being tnformed by Aim All that the reductron in lighting will compromise Aim All's security system. It would seem that Aim All's efforts to keep its facility safe, secure and a crone free site would be of greater unportance to the surrounding commumty than the appeasement of a very few possibly hyper-sensitive individuals 4. Build a new wall on its property to lode from view an existing approved wall which again, reportedly a very few individuals have complained of on purely aesthetic grounds The single item which has been the subject of complaint, again appazently from only one or two residents, which Aim All has declined to modify is the roofing material used throughout the facility The approved metal roofing is an azchitectural feature of the facility, the replacement of which would be an extremely expensive undertaking. As noted by Mr. Huynh's October 13, 2005 letter to the Mayor and Members of the city council, the present composition of the roofing at the facility "meets the requerements of the approved plans ". In addressing the most recent letters of Mr and Mrs Crowl and Mr and Mrs Selos to the Cny Planning Department it seems appropriate to respond to each letter point by point. Before doing so however it is worth noting that both the Selos' and the Crowls have acknowledged that they have actively opposed this project from the eazliest planning stages. It is the rare project that is able to win over the hearts of all of its former opponents. In many instances there is a point at which tt must be recognized that some people are simply never going to be satisfied with the project (or at least admit to being satisfied) regardless of any measures the owner may take. In the Crowl letter of November 2°d 2005 Mr and Mrs Crowl list nine areas of concern. Those areas of concern and Aim All's response are as follows• 1.Claimed denial of access to the elevations for the project. Aim All's Response. The elevations for the project have always been available for inspection by any interested party either at the City's Building Department or at the offices of Aim All. The elevations were, of course, a component of the information reviewed and considered in the permit application process and were subject to public review and comment both prior to and at the public hearing held in connection with the permtt apphcatron. 2. Completion of Cal Trans sound Wall Aim All's Response: The only representations concerning the "sound wall" to which the letters refer aze purported representations made to area residents by Cal Trans. Aim All has made no representations concerning the construction of any wall the purpose of which /`r Dan Coleman Nov 14, 2005 Page 3 was in any way to mitigate sound, which was inconsistent with the plans approved for the project Aun All has in fact heazd from various residents that its building "A" with rts razsed parapet has reduced to nil the volume of sound coming from Haven Avenue while the wall of building "B" has done the same with noise coming from the 210 Freeway Concerns about the metal roofing matenal of the project Aim All's Response: The use of metal roofmg has been an architectural feature of the project from the eazliest conceptual design. Just as with all other features of the project the use of metal roofmg was subject to public comment or objection in the permit application stage. Following completion of the public hearing and after giving the matter its full consideration the City's Planning Commission approved the use of metal roofmg for the project It is Aim All's contention that an independent investigation into the complaints concenung the metal roofmg would establish that the complaints as to glare and noise aze simply unfounded. 4. Concerns over the height of the Buildings adjacent to the Moore residence. Aim All's Response: (see comments re: number 3 above which apply equally to the heights of each of the buildings comprising the project.) Concerns re: landscaping and beautification plans: Aim All's Response: All landscaping has been installed in stnct accordance with the approved plans for the project. While Aim All believes the landscaping in its present state is very attractive and is consistent with highest standazds of the neighborhood, the beauty of the landscaping will only improve with time as it matures. 6. Concerns re: lighting: Aim All's Response: While the location and candlepower/watts of the exterior lighting for the project have been a known quantity since well before the construction phase, Aim All is cogniTant of the fact that the actual~effect the lighting will have is difficult to know until it is actually observed in operation. Aim All has taken a number of steps to reduce direct light as well as glare from reflected light from being directed toward the adjacent residences. It is Aim All's understanding that its mitigative efforts have been successful and that light /glaze concerns are no longer an issue. It is however important that Aim All and the City keep the interests of the entire housing development in mind when making changes which may benefit the few to the possible detriment of the whole. It may well be that the interests of the neighboring residents as a whole in having Aim All take all available steps, including sufficient lighting, to insure that the project is safe and crime free may be greater than their interest that no glare be visible to a few homes. While a very few residents may object to any light at all coming from the Aim All _ premises, it should be understood that to the extent that the exterior lighting is reduced at the project Aim All's security efforts are to some extent compromised. ~-l<o Dan Coleman Nov. 14, 2005 Page• 4 7. Concern re pink colored walls. Aim All's Response: The pink colored walls of the project were depicted as such from the eazly artists renderings. No representations were ever made by Aim All that the walls would be painted any other color, only that the colors used on the project would be compatible and not clash with the existing neighborhood Aim All believes that the present colors aze very neutral, tasteful and achieve that objective. The like or dislike of any particulaz color is such a subjective matter that it is doubtful that any color would gain universal approval. 8. Concern re: hours of operation: Aim All's Response: The hours during which Aim All tenants aze permitted access to the facility have been reduced to between 7:OOam and 7:00 pm. The Crowls are certainly aware of this concession by Aun All and it is difficult to understand why ties resolved tssue is being revived at this date. 9 Concern re: traffic control. Aim All's Response: Traffic control on the City streets is of course beyond the control of Aim All. With regazd to the Crowl's expressed concern over the use of the "emergency entrance" by Aim All tenants, Aim All will make that entrance unavailable to its tenants. As for the Selos' letter of November 6"` it appears that their concerns are for the most part limited to the "completion of the Cal Trans sound wall" and the impact the 210 freeway and the subject project has had on their view .With regard to the sound wall [information to be supplied by client] As for the impact on the Selos' view, while one can certainly understand and commiserate with them in the loss of view, the fact remains that as a generai Wile in California a property owner does not have a right to a continued unimpeded view. Most new construction will in some way affect or interfere with the view of neazby existing neighbors, it is one of the unfortunate byproducts of living in a developing area. As stated in Miller & Starr California Real Estate 2°" at § 29:6 ".. since a property owner has no tmplied easement for a view .. he cannot complain about the creatton of a building or structure, and it is not a nuisance, merely because it obstructs the view or ltght and atr as long as tt was constructed lawfully pursuant to validly issued permits " citing among other authorities Wolford v Thomas (1987 190 CA3d 347. In your November 3'~ letter to Mr. Giurbino of Aim All you advise Mr. Giurbino that Aim All's alleged violations or nonconformance with its conditional use permit are set forth in your previous letter of September 28, 2005 to Mike Tormey, Aim All's construction supervisor. The September 28, 20051etter discussed the need for Aim All to reduce the reflecting glare of light from its facility . and to reduce the hours during which tenant access to the facility is available. Both of these concerns as well as others have, as discussed above, been addressed by Aim All or are in the process L-/'~ Dan Coleman Nov. 14, 2005 Page 5 of being remedied. Accordingly, in the absence of the City directing Aim All to a specific uncured violation ornon-compliance with the terms, conditions or requirements of its conditional use permit Aim All considers itself to be in full compliance with the permit. This letter opened with the comment that Aim All has strived and will continue to strive to be a good and responsible neighbor. In doing so it asks for the same consideration from its own neighbors and that the City continue to give equal consideration to the interests of both factions. Sincerely, LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM G. BISSELL /.~~~~~/ William G. Bissell cc: . Mayor William J. Alexander Mayor Pro Tem Diane Williams Councilman Rex Gutierrez Councihnan L. Dennis Michael Councilman Sam Spagnolo Mr. Trang Huynh Dept. of Building & Safety ~-/8' UY { I i Z . ''~~ a ~ .t =at 'TSr t,} r~` 'rrt Y 1FE 4 {~ F` y }' }TY='x u~ S~' t~ +r v _ -. Y..-` ~ r i i~ Y.i. ~~i T "d ~ T~ ~ ~ - ~ - ~~ .r ~y ~~aTt.t ~a•t ~~r • ~ } t - - ,. - S - ''h~ ,, t .'riffs ,#x;r'. ~1' ~ - `rv' ~. `„u.a=y - . _ ~ r`v ~ ~ - '~.-f.. r}~ ' rr~_ S.T' ,ifs y~y;~ . t ~' •~ 's`='. „ ~ ~t ~r s~.e.s C ~`~~yK 't ~ W`t'~~.o....~ v~"-"' '1 ~..~ Y-:. ~.: ' .~ ~ ~' ,a +~ ~}4~ .r r-r rbr_ x~`ri t;n"~nkr~~'~d. -' t _ ~t~~+ ir• Y.f > s. .. s,~< 4 a't~a,.r ~ S~ ~, s 1 ~ ' rt'~'1.7 /, :. `r4~. ~ i >*•waC ,si'': :;;q, }~~r ~yy..§t~ ~?~~~.':.~Y?P.?r~i<~ ~ ~. V„ 1~, Y~~aU .I'u ,z. R~ ry"ra,1, For n (y-~`.~ A~,f'~~ $r.' {.~ r - ;.. . 4 ti -• .~ i ~~ r - ~„ i i.~ ;3~~ { : 4t<o` ~K?j.~>~ 3~i1x i wi.. ~ _ ~•{• e; fi. ~ . ' ~ ~~, t .7-T2~~ :~swrc~a ~i 1, ~' ~°.,t .. Ft d ~~' a • ,. 1 r~~' ~ 4M ~!~( i~F'.4,~~gs j~?y~t~+','~~it4j~~_~y..rc \`„~. ..y= r ~ 'tt'"' ~ ~ <`;, i . v~.^'?~;t,~Fy , : ~ ~ ): ,i,~. ~ 54.x, a: ~. Y $ r.~ r' ' S `#y.l pa 1 h '~i~ p,~-,x~,,.~._~T'4Q n'G~~S.p?>,'i =w~r~~Gi~' _ ' ' ~.k°-.1 . 5.,~-•r y~ ~ {.=`'y~'r:r 3/.4 '~,~'! ~+'F.~~1~1' 1 ~ ~rr~ gi l icy.." ~~," )~,,~ ~3~ ~q v ~1~ ~- ' ~~~ '. ~ #. `j`ai Y~l'ta` ; r}~LL~K' TR L"l ~: H '>~: ' Y ~ P~ 1 t_t i ~ ~x{Y ry< 14 ~~ , .. ~~ ~ r , ~~~~ f1r. ~'?, '. T'M 'ef- ~'~' ' ^ ~~~ i Y i~i~ tom'. ~ h ~~,~ wt St ..r~ti , ~T. _ ~ sr. f '14 Yid i r r ~, ~ ~. ss +tY~~"~a". k;! - r t ~' Y ~ ~ ~. •)6 . •i ty~~ ~~t.~ ~r .tF+ _ _ 'S~ y~;}' }i I I it I~, ~~I ~7 ~;~~~Cx C4~6 i~ ~f •}1,' XHIBIT F ~~-~~.. -~ E 1} ... ~. r ~ ~~ ~1 r A I ~' S~'Y Jy~ ~ ~ '- ,J' ~...~ ~ . . Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ a~ ~ ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ti ~ ~ ~ ~~ . _ t ' .~ri ~. ~ - ~ b. ; . ~ f 7J~ ~ ~. }~~i ~`~ ~ ~ ~. i ~ ' ~~ i a- . -Y7 f~ ,' 1 ' ' i t . ~ - - y ~ ~~. • • ~ ~ t { ~-~ 1 ~~ L: _ !~ ~~i~,? f ~ r ~ e~ ~(' +' E~ F- (E 1 1. r ~ .~' ~~%~ ;"{~ "' i ' ,~,?^~ f ~ ~ {~ r~ ~ a ~ . 4. • =C • _t'r n irv o- A~ ;L *" . +' ~. ,.+; .C :~ .'_ , fi t ~ ~ ~ .'.+ '. ~ . T t ~`~ „ n~ ~ T ^a w 4 ` rt ` L ` Y . ~ Y ` '~ A C ` 4 t ' f' } t r? yx„x ¢ W ~ ~ ~ ... . * .~h~ _ F ~.i3. _ - a .~ _ ,- ~, .. ~ ~ Yt ~ 1 4, ~ I 1 I 1 I F r r `( ` ~ ~ '~-~~ !t ISS k~ 4 3`1 s~.w..~~~(7(.y~Sf}~ l^a1T - -'~'gMf' ' * fi ? . .. r , ~i. +, ~.., kj i .,,, ~ ~ • ~, ~.~ ,~,E ,~va,~ ~b~Y. "• ~~_ 4 J,N w : , • tea.' Y ' ! i.yia Y. y"'~ ~~' fit..-ug. `a' 3,1, ~,~.;~"~ c i '~} ~ }~ ~ J FF~}-` l3S:s ' ~~S i }~ ; yrv -_ ~.KrYK"3}u. ~ . ).ti i ~fY S l~ . sI( ~~ ~. .'.d ~? -;tr u-K • ~-~ K ~, 33', ,,...; 3 ik. 1 ~ 5 ? ,' « S ~F`" .... Z.`" a..,, } ~ ~` ~ ..' ~.~jp~ ~~' «t ~~~ ~~~ •$3 t "x~ ~~~a~~'.s:. k # ki +4! ~Y ~~ k, s , F yS ;' 1 ~' ..~~. ~ ,' 4 t . .y rJ ~~aa ~ry _;.. iF-~ i Y .1 ~ .~ •4`1.. i k ` . ~ 5 bwk~'~tf^9 ~j t'N' °-„4'f[~~,k a '~N-rya3\mrr.~~ pnf a „~ ~y'~l s ix* «; CA:2 t ¢~ Y.J ..r ~YN {25 ~. ~'~kx i~ a~~ ~~ ~.% i .e Xk d ~ J J ¢ if ~ ~~ ~Jt y.{< s~ ~ _ _ .. ~ rv~jE~, e ~i~'~y ~lY ~~ JJ ufi{e' L , t 3 I. ~ i Y~ '. '. j'W'?' ~ WI'e ~_ 3 ~~~ ~~~ a `" ~~~tpi~r ~3~ ~' '.i... '~. t~Ffa ; ea ~ yYa i ~ ~ -y .~ ~ ~,, o r' v ..~',` .A , ,• r, '" ~ -£r : _ +=y,"S'r '~~` ..fib ~ k°ts d _ - - _ ~ r y_, t t ~ cf, 4. w •...'wF'.:~~#"°>f-a~ ~ ;°~' 1 -a, ~ =erg ~~ `yt: `r~ a~ 'ir... rn e. f t~ ~i jT~ iws .<_`3>NCjr^" ^ "tY.~:. C''`~'ah ~., .- ~ ter` ~~ { ~;' ~ !+„ _ , Per. ," :;~ ,, nr• „ ( .~Fa ;;. ~.'g 1 ~ r ~ 3 ~~ , •'--%s; ,~ _ - ., r. - +~~, 1 ~~ 1 "~~~?>i~ 1 '~ ~f '^. _-_ 4~ ' ~' ` { s ~ r ~ - ( - 't ~ v: , may" °~h`; ~.1- „~,~ k r (' 1,%vun t 4 ~•, F ~~. ~-~Swylh~al Y ~ . .+{(~~ ~1e la~:f4~i- ~, i1J f""~~V R, S' I,>[ .~ .~~v ')~z.~-~ L' ..l? •~J~f i.. r.~ • mom: FF N It~~:f lk-5T. # _ !' A a t .i Psi ` ~.> :. /~ .~ ,` e 4 yw h~iy 1 '.~ 1 t ' f -,,t ~ { .) ~. 'Y.. w'. f 1. }t "~~ "'"}~} ~}E~ `~ ~.~ y ~"ri ~~'e a a ~ ~u ~ll ~l `~ ! xt''~• Ike E ~ ~~~ "`~~.3;~Y,'i"4 ~F. 1 +P~f-.. 3 ~'~ '+: it . ~? t .. n° r~ . 2 {, . m di' ,ro -3T"6'..74;, .~, b'k~1' ' .~ ~`:.~ -~L ~- p~`iy+5 u-yl!o ii~~»s`irN,'~Y ~' .r,.; t'gF <~"}~_ t J. ,. F„ }~i 1. j] ~r~ 1~".xr. ~1:: t 1 ,. sk ,?r'S~.'"4 ~. '. F~ ~ NiS• ) f 1 " ~ ,'I y ^rn.~-'~lyf~ 4Ct' itf ~ `( F rl v r~ 1 ~^ -. ~y '~ ,• { t'~;, rTCry, ,ter 1 t~~} 't, I. ..~ ..'r- ~ t:~; ,:. ~, .. _ ,ter ,. ~'~! ~,.~a ~'. .:.i+ 7- ).~~.u'i ~s'~{~. ; ~i1 Y,•;"s~ ~ ~~:gti~w. a,a:.,,.:y; ' 1. , ~ yu ~1.y ,d. f "~{r ~{ _ "•,~<~!!, a ~" 1.M' M t. " ~ d L~ ,slt •~ f i ~,^ hti tl y~>F ~~ ~'~t ";SYyz~P,y ,- ,~ t^ ; , - t.~,; Fr 4`r,-.~-; _~{ ICI q.,~.`~~' f ~. _ ,u.._ 4Y :~ \-~_ • f }'- ~~' . t. ' r • ~. AIM ALL STORAGE Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00850 Resolved Issues: 1.Hours of operation -Close at 7:00 p.m. • Resident requested closing time at 7:00 p.m. • Aim All now closing at 7:00 p.m. with "one hour" grace period. 2. Glare from lights shining onto the two large white wall of the 2-story building. • Resident requested repainting darker color • Repainting completed by Aim All. 3. Gaps between walls at southeast corner • Residents requested closing gaps • Aim All has agreed to close the gap with solid wall when the new stepping wall is built (see item no. 4 below). EXHIBIT G „~uuoum.uw aumc. iunuurt lu~tl~iun __ linqunai~ Imii nilldi.l~~I~°\II ~IIIR\~d Jui - ~~ AIM ALL STORAGE ~ Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00850 4. Sloping block walls at the southeast corner • Residents requested a new stepping wall to hide the existing sloping wall. • Aim All obtained permits for both the as- built wall and the new stepping wall. Building & Safety has inspected the as-built wall and we are waiting for the starting of the construction~of the new stepping wall. ~ Outstanding Issues: 5. Freeway noise • Resident wanted sound wall matching the height of Caltrans wall (14-16 feet high) • Aim All declined 6. Security • Resident wanted perimeter wall raised and gaps closed ~ • Aim All has installed 7' wrought iron gate - at bottom of slope, but not at top of slope. l I)w unnm.dnJ liwm~. l~.nn uu In.Jhmu_. Lmpui air Inlii nill J~. Ul tikl ~~ AI~VII tiIUKNd Joy ~ a- AIM ALL STORAGE - -- - ConditionaI Use Permit DRC2003-00850 ~ Outstanding Issues: 7. Lighting glare • Resident wanted lights turned off or shielded. • Aim All has tried various levels of lighting from no lighting to full lighting. At this time the lights are at a very minimum level in order to operate the security camera. 8. Glare from sunlight on white rooftops • Resident wanted roofs painted darker color. • Aim All declined 9. Noise of rain falling on metal rooftops • Resident wanted different roofing material • Aim All declined l I)oiunnm•dnJ 4Wm_ Iunum. lu.al ~iun __ linywian ln0.nx11 d~. 1~LAlL~`(~I \II tilUlt\ld Ju. _ . RESOLUTION NO. 04-48 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00850, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND THE EASTBOUND 210-FREEWAY ON-RAMP, IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN' 1076-331-02 AND 1076-341-01 (A PORTION). A. Recitals 1 Charles Joseph Assoaates filed an application on behalf of Aim All Storage for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00850, as described in the tdle of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subied Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2 On the 28th day of April 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and conGuded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, deterimned, and resolved by the Plannng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the fads set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on April 28, X004, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifcaly finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at the southeast comer of Haven Avenue and the eastbound on-ramp of the 210-Freeway, with a street frontage of approximately 405 feet along Haven Avenue, and a lot depth of approwmatey 560 feet, which is presently improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk along Haven Avenue; and b. The property to the north of the subject ske is the 210-Freeway, the property to the south of the proposed storage facility is proposed to be subdivided by Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16646 into seven lots for single-family detached homes, and the property tothe east consists of existing single-family homes; and c The Conditional Use Perind is intended for a public storage fadlity, which is allowed in the Low Residential Distnd upon review and approval of a Conditional Use PennR and the findings noted below (Development Code Section 17.08 030.E.5); and d. The proposed managers apartment is subject to noise levels exceeding 65 CNEL along Haven Avenue, which can be mitigated to acceptable levels as described in the noise study prepared for the protect; and EXHIBIT H ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-48 DRC2003-00850 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -AIM ALL STORAGE Apnl 28, 2004 Page 2 e The proposed protect conforms to the standards and regulations of the as noted in the staff report; and arkin d g p Development Code, in terns of building separation an f. The proposed project and the intended uses, together with all Conditions of welfare or matenally injunous to Approval will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or onents are required to complete all properties or improvements in the vicinity The project prop acent to the site. The 210-Freeway is a significant generator of ments ad l a t missing parkway improve st be mitigated in a residential environment. The proposed public storage facility wil noise that mu act as a sound buffer between the residences and the roadway noise. g, The proposed public storage facility is, by nature of the operation, a facilitythat has and would therefore provide a buffer i se, a low activity level, generates little traffic and very little no enue and the exsting single-family residential A v between the 210-Freeway and Haven lternative to the typical freeway sound wall. neighborhood, as an a 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the f facts set forth in paragn3phs 1 and above-referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings o ' 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the a . Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposed use, together with the conddions applicable thereto, will not be b ious to properties or . detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injur improvements in the vicinity c. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the t Code Section 17.08.030.E.5 as noted: Development Code and the specific findings of Developmen d. The development of amini-storage may be considered in residential land use ned in Section 17.08 050.F. of the tl i districts as a means of mitigating land use conflicts ou are certain locations within the City where residentially zoned properties Th i ere ng Development Code are located adjacent to undeveloped parcels of land where this transition between the exist h traffic corridors, commercial or hi e g ., residential neighborhood and non-residential influences (i. ts desirable development, resulting in industnal land uses, etc.) is a primary design issue that preven undeveloped or underdeveloped The mini-storage would be considered in d i i t ng e n such parcels rema situations where the facility would act as a mitigational buffer for residential developments impac and issues determined by the by unchangeable environmental issues, such as traffic, noise, Planning Commission. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative 4 environmental assessment for th f , e or Declaration, together with all wntten and oral reports inGuded o substantial evidence that the project the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is n the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and will have a significant effect upon Monitoring Program ariached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: c ~a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-48 DRC2003-00850 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -AIM ALL STORAGE • Apnl 28, 2004 Page 3 a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared incompliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Dedaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration v~nth regard to the application ~ b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identfies certain significant ' reduced tonanl acceptabletlevlell by the impos t oin of'mitigat on mealsures'on the pro ecthwhich are listed below as Conditions of Approval. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Tdle 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Dedaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habilat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Dedaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning adverse elffect asnset forth m~ Sect on7 53.5(0.1 d) off T~t er 14 oIf the Calbif mia Cotde of ReguPat~onsf • 5. Based upon the findings and condusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, anld nothe Standard Condt onseattached Thereto andimcotrpo ed here n bycethis~referetn ~ below Planning Division 1) This public storage fadlity shall complete full frontage improvements along Haven Avenue, inducting landscaping and block wall at Lots 6 and 7 of adioining Tentative Trail Map SUBTT16648. 2) The developer has agreed to work in conjunction with the Gty Planner to develop an artistic representation of the City logo on the tower element, located at the northwest comer of the sNe, near the 210-Freeway on-ramp. 3) Construct a 6-foot decorative wall along the south boundary of the public storage parking area (north boundary of Lot 6). 4) Landscaping with the emergency access to Heather Street shall indude trees and slope planting per City requirements. 5) The emergency access onto Heather Street shall be dual gated, with one gate at the southern building face, and a second gate at the bulding setback line along Heather Street All landscaping within the gated area shall be landscaped, imgated, and maintained by the public • storage fatality operator. 6). The developer shall conduct apre-construction meeting with the residents of Valinda Avenue pnor to ground disturbing activities, in c~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-48 DRC2003-00850 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -AIM ALL STORAGE Apnl 28, 2004 Page 4 order to coordinate protection of ewsting property along the probed boundary. ~ Provide more decorative wall mounted decor, rather than the square metal factures shown on the Conceptual Plans, to the satisfaction of the Gty Planner 8) No signs are approved by this Conditional Use Permit A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for Planning Commission rewew and approval pnor to issuance of buil`ditntg he Si n Any signs proposed for this development shall comply 9 Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval prior to installation of any signs Enpineerino Division 1) Haven Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance vwth City "Mayor Divided Artenal" standards, including but not limited to the folloHnng~ a) Provide curb, gutter, sidewalk, and streetlights as regwred. b) There shall be no additional openings in the Haven Avenue . median. c) Install access ramps for pedestrians to cross the 210-Freeway on-ramp. d) Protect ewsting 210-Freeway on-ramp traffic signal and egwpment, or relocate/replace as required e) Protect signage, striping and R26 "No Stopping" signs, or replace as regwred. 2) Parkway landscaping behind Lots 6 and 7 shall be included in the Landscape Maintenance District. The parkway landscaping allowing the public storage fatality shall be privately maintained. 3) Sidewalks shall cross drive approaches at the zero curb face. Provide additional public nght-of--way as needed. 4) Parkways shall slope at two percent from the top of wrb to 1-foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages. 5) Heather Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Local Residential" standards, inGuding but not limited to the following: a) Provide curb and gutter, and property line adjacent sidewalk, as . regwred. C 3a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-48 DRC2003-00850 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -AIM ALL STORAGE • Apnl 28, 2004 Page 5 b) Provide 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlights, as required. c) Street trees and dnve approaches shall be installed upon development. 6) The irrevocable offer of dedication per Parcel Map 7237 shall be abandoned pnor to the issuance of building permits. 7) The existing overhead utilities (telewmmunications and electncal, except for the 66kv electncal) on the project side of Haven Avenue shall be undergrounded along the entire prolect frontage of both Lots 6 and 7 of the tentative tract map, as well as Lot 8 of the tentative tract map, which is the site intended for the public storage faulity. Undergroundmg shall extend to the first pole off-site (south), prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing Haven Avenue shall be undergrounded at the same time The developer may request a reimbursement agreementto recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future - development (or redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being . accepted by the Cdy, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 8) On-site dremage facilities shall be designed for Q100, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to the issuance of grading pertnRs. Overflows for the commercial sde shall not impact the single-family residential lots. g) According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panel 7890, a portion of subject property along Haven Avenue is within Flood Zone 'A'. It is possible that sufficient flood protection has been provided with the construction of the 210-Freeway and the Master Plan Storm Drain in Haven Avenue. However, the current Flood Zone 'A' designation remains. The developer shall apply the construction standards outlined in paragraph 19 12.051 of Ordinance 6569 to atl new construction v~nthin Flood Zone 'A,' or process a revision to the FIRM directly through FEMA. 10) Management P9anm(WQMP) shall(be^shown on the Grad ng Pe unto the satisfaction of the Cdy Engineer Environmental Mitigation Air Qualify • 1) All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction eg}w~-pment is being properly serviced and G PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 048 DRC2003-00850 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -AIM ALL STORAGE Apnl 28, 2004 Page 6 • maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for Cdy verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading perrnts, the developer shall submd construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide util zed, or t at the r use was irrvestligated and found to be nfeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distnd (SCAQMD), as well as Gty Planrnng staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed perfornance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) 403 AdditiolnaltyQcontractorsashallmndude the fol owing prov sOonsnd Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering prectices. Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City ff silt is tamed over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of haulrng. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. exceed ng 25 milese pe o hou jnnn eiacho do ncel~ with SCAQMD Rule 403 regwrements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB)) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM~o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-48 DRC2003-00850 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -AIM ALL STORAGE Apnl 28, 2004 Page 7 7) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 98 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible 9) p anscnclude aa'statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not m use. 10) be eft dllingtfor prolonlged peln'odst(Se.ninexcess of 10tminutes) II not 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 12) All residential and commercial structures shall be regwred to incorporate thermal pane vwndows and weather-stopping. . Cultural Resoun:es 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualdied archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropnate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact intenm measures to protect undesignated sRes from demolition or significant modification v~nthout an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites wnthin new developments, using theirspeaal qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on signro ceate important, and unique prehistoric resources, following app p CEQA guidelines. Prepare a technical resources mangos d m beat on of resount~~ the inventory, evaluation, and prop 9 within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with onginal illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Infortnation-Centerfoi permanent archiving ~~~ - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-48 DRC2003-00850 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -AIM ALL STORAGE Apnl 28, 2004 Page 8 • 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct apre-construction field survey of the protect sde. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide speafic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e., paleontological monitonng) that may be appropnate. Where mitigation monitonng is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limded to, the follownng measures. a Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing activities Should fossils be found wnthm an area being Geared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the montor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Submd a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected speumens wrath a copy of the report to the San Bemardmo County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent . (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daffy to reduce PM~o emissions, m accordance wrath SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PMro emissions associated wrath vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour to mmim~ze PM,o emissions from the ske during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the project where appropriate. Measures thatmay be used to mimm¢e runoff and to enhance infiNration inducts Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bncks, tertaces, diversions, runoff - spreaders, seepage pks, and recharge basins. 2) Pnor to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the . City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a protect description c ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-48 DRC2003-00850 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -AIM ALL STORAGE Apnl 28, 2004 Page 9 and identifying BMPs that wdl be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identifythe structural and non-structural measures consistentwith the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga June 2000. 3) Pnor to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Store Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (~ e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Pernd Noise Manager's Aaartment: 1) Bariers with a minimum of 6-1/2 feet shall be constructed around the penmeter of the second-floor decks The bamers shall be continuous structures and shall be constructed of a matenal with a surface density of at least four pounds per square foot All glazing assemblies used throughout the manager's apartment shall be well fitted and weather-stepped In addition, sound-rated doors and ~nnndows shall be required for compliance with the intenor noise standard. The following table identifies the estimated minimum Sound Trensmission Class (STC) ratings that are required for the doors and windows: Estimated Minimum STC LOCATION ~ Entry or Sliding Window Glass Door North Elevation (Second WA 28 Floor) West Elevation 32 WA (First and Second Floor- residential area only) South Elevation 32 32 (First and Second Floor - residential area ony) STC is per ASTM Designations E413 and E336 or E90 A qualified acoustical consultant shall determine the exact STC rating required at each location on the protect sde dunng the final design phase of the protect ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-48 DRC2003-00850 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -AIM ALL STORAGE Apnl 28, 2004 Page 10 ~, 2) The intenor noise standard is to be met wrath windows and doors closed, therefore, ventilation is needed in order to provide a habitable environment. Any fresh air intake ducts or other openings shall be onented away from Haven Avenue All ducts shall incorporate at least 6 inches of flexible fiberglass ducting, and at least on 90-degree bend. Wall-mounted air conditioners shall not be used. 3) The roof system shall have a minimum 1/2-inch plywood sheathing that is well sealed to form a continuous barrierto the noise Minimum R-19 insulation Batts shall be placed m the joist space. 4) 7 Bench stullcco extenor,cwithtm nmum R-9~nsulat onllbatts between the studs. All /omts shall be well fitted and/or caulked to form an airtight seal 5) In order to ensure adequate sound absorption, the following should be included in the project design: a) Including the first floobstair anld hall)thThe carpet sh P havens minimum pile height of 1/8-inch. b) Atl interior walls shall be of gypsum wallboard construction ,~ 6) A qualified acoustical consultant shall review the final design of the project to venfy compliance wrath the City Noise Standards All Construction Activities: 1) p rasa d 6 30 a m~on weekdaysin udlmg Saturday,toeat anyt~me~on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02 120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitonng at other times may be required by the Planning Division. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance wrath above noise standards or halted 3) The perimeter wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. G 3g PLANNING COMMISSICJ~~ , tESOLUTION NO 04-48 DRC2003-00850 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -AIM ALL STORAGE Apnl 28, 2004 Page 11 4) Haul truck delrvenes shall not take place between the hours of 8.00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, inGuding Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily tnps (counting both to and from the construction sde), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF APRIL 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Rich MaGas, Chauman . ATTEST• Brad B cret ry I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby Planning Commisson ofRthe ICity of Rancho CucamonganaroauregulaameeHng ofthe Plamm~g Commission held on the 28th day of Apnl 2004, by the folloHnng vote-to-w~t• AYES COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS. FLETCHER, MACIAS, McPHAIL, STEWART NONE McNIEL ~, E-3~ ~ • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00850 SUBJECT: AIM ALL STORAGE APPLICANT: CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND THE EASTBOUND 210-FREEWAY ON-RAMP ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Completion Date A. General Requirements ~ The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Cdy, ds 1 ~~ . agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the aftematrve, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, ds agents, officers, or es l , oye emp employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The Cdy may, at its sole discretion, participate at as own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 04-48, Standard shall be included on the plans (full size). The t t l ~~- ions iga mi Conditions, and all environmenta sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not regwred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Archdect. B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit and Variance approval shall expve rf building permits are not issued or 1 ~~_ . approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed C. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include 1 ~~- . architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and site plans , grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations • SC-1-04 1 U ' 0 i ~planrnngVinaltpingcommtdre2003-00 `8.~0 ponds 4.28 doc _ Project No DRC2003-00850 Comoletion Date 2. Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner • 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been compiled with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Bulding and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance pnor to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner rewew and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency pnor to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdmsion, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of budding permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) pnor to the issuance of bwldmg permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adfacent properties. 8 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for indmdual units with all receptacles shielded from public view 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 10. All budding numbers and indmdual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 11. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the Cdy. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer rewew and approved pnor to the issuance of building permts. 12. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adfoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mad, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days pnor to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the profect's perimeter. 13. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to maintain an open feeling and enhance views. D. Building Design . 2 SC-1-04 Ali roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted egwpment and/or protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adfacent properties and streets as regwred by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the bwldmg design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in budding plans. For commercial and industrial protects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main bwldmg colors. i lplannmg\fmal~pingcommWrc2003.00850 coeds 4-28 doc 2 ~•-~~ -/-/- _/~- ~~- ~-/- ., ~~- ~~- _/~ _/~- ~J- ~~- ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~- Project No DRC2003-00850 Completion Date E. F. G. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long W hen a side of any parking space abuts ~_l~ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minmum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall ~~- contain a 12-inch walk adlacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be prowded ~~- . throughout the development to connect dwellings/umts/bwldings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses 4. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, ~~- and exits shall be striped per Cdy standards. 5 Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, Cary Engineer, and Rancho ~~ . Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of bwlding permits For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. 6 Handicap accessible stalls shall be prowded for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more ~~ parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped. Trip Reduction 1. Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and other ~._/- non-residential development. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in ~~- . the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner revew and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits or prior final map approval n the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2 Existing trees regwred to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in ~~- . accordance wdhthe Mumapal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be ' s shown on the detailed landscape plans. The"applicant shall follow all of the arbonst recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 3 A minimum of 30% wdhin commercal and office protects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch ~~_ box or larger. 4 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking _/~ stalls. 5. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adlacent to and along structures at a rate of one .~~- tree per 30 linear feet of budding 6 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5'1 or greater slope, but less than 2'1 ~~- . slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion wred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be re lantin Sl g g ope p control. installed by the developer prior to occupancy. • SC-1-04 " i \planning\fmal\pingcommtdre2003-00850 cords 4.28 doc 3 E-L.~a Protect No DRC2003-00850 Completion Dale 7 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 8 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subtect to Ctty Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Division 9 Speaal landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, speamen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensrfied landscaping, is required along Haven Avenue 10 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division 11 Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to issuance of building permits These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species 12 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscepe as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code H. Signs `. J 2 A Unrform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for Planning Commission review and approval prior to issuance of budding permits The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and Sign Program and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division pnor to installation of any signs Environmental 2. 3. 4 SC-1-04 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher protect in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, pnor to accepting a cash deposit on any property. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the 210 and I-15 Freeways in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of bulding permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuatior to below 45 CNEL, the budding materials and construction techniques provided, and d appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checker for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations o the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior am exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards Certification shall bE submitted to the Bwlding & Safety Division pnor to final occupancy release of the affected homes Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is relicant shlallfbe reeu ed ti implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting App q i \planning\flnalWingcomm\dre2003-OOb50 aonds 42B doc 4 Ci-Y.3 ~ / / / a I / / / / / / / -~-~- /_/_ / / I / / / -~-~- Protect No DRC2003-00850 Completion Date post cash, letter of credit, or other farms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 00 prior to the issuance of binding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertormance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds maybe used bythe Cityto retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete atl actions requred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit J. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U.S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDRIONAL REVIEW(S) K. General Requirements Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Protect Number (i.e., SUBTT #, SUBTPM#, DRC #) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and 'wet' signature are required pnor to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and W orkers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Division. 6 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Bwlding and Safety Division staff for information and submittal regwrements. L. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2003-00850). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in SC-1-04 ~ ~ i ~planningVinartpingcomm~dre2003-00950 contls 4-2a doc 5 (~ ~ r J~- ~J ~~ ~~ ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~ Protect No DRC2003-00850 Comole4on Date effect at the time of permit application Contact the Bulding and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and Schooi Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Bwlding and Safety Division prior to permits issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bulding and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of budding permits. 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6.30 a m Monday through Saturday, wdh no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter) M. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Bulding Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for regwred occupancy separations 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's °high wind° instructions. 4. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC Section 1505 5. Provide draft stops in attics in line with common walls 6. Roofing materials shall be Class 'A' 7. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the regwred fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A 8 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. 9. Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same bwlding shall be not less than 1-hour fire-resistive construction 10. Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with CBC Section 906 11. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. N. Grading 1 2. 3. 4 i SC-1-OA Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance wdh Califomia Bulding Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Califomra to pertorm such work -- The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing bwldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and till The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Calfomia registered Civil Engineer. i tplennmgVinaitpingrgmmY1rr2003-00850 cords 4-28 doc 6 ~,~ /s - ~~- -~-~- ~~~ ~~- ~-/- ~~ ~~- ~~- ~J- ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~- J~- Protect No DRC2003-00850 Comolellon Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-oi-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 105 (Varies) total feet on Haven Avenue 30 total feet on Heather Street All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map. P. Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, communitytrails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall Include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any bwlding service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements requred by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one bwlding or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those bwldings, or unds proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the bwldings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development. ~ rnnctruct the following Denmeter street improvements including, but not limited to: v Curb b 0.C. Sldtr Drive Street Street Comm Median Blke Street Name Gutter Wmt walk Appr. Lights Trees 7ra11 Island Trell Other HAVEN AVENUE X (c) X HEATHER STREET X X X X X X t (b) Pav ement reconstruction Notes: (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and irrigation on me er and overlays well be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item. 4. SC-1-04 Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Prior to any work being construction permit shall other permits required Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Cnnl Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Cily Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior tc final map approval or the issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first. performed in public right-of-way, tees shall be paid and s be obtained from the City Engineer's ONice in addition to ant ~ ~plennmgVmartpingcommtdre2003.00850 cords 4-28 doc 7C'1~ y i ~J- ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~_ C_J ~~- ~J- ~~~ Protect No DRC2003-00850 Completion Date u c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal condut, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d Signal conduct with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes. 1) Puli boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer t. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure pennrts are requved A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drams shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. 5. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program 6. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line dem within the construction legend stating• 'Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(lypically sheet 1)' Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conddions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Mln. Streel Name Botanical Name Common Name Grow Space Spaeing Slze Gty. Haven Avenue Magnolia NCN 8 ft 60 tt O.C. 15 gal FIII (Foreground) grandlflora (INTENTIONALLY In P.A. B R or greater, 'Matestic Beauty SPACED THIS FAR generally in front of APART) sidewalk P.A. less than 8 ft Magnolia NCN 3 ft 20 ft. O.C. 15 gal grandlflora 'St Mary ' Primary tree in Brachychiton Bottle B tt 25 ft. O C. 15 gal masses, mainly populneus Tree (INFORMAL IF behind siewalk MAINTAINED BY CITY) Heather Street Platanus London 8 ft 30 tt O.C. 15 gal acerifolia Plane Tree SC-1-04 i planning\tinel\pingcommWrc2003-00850 conds 4-28 doc s C ~~ _/-~- ~_~_ ~~- • ~~- ~~. ~~- ~~_ ~_J- Project No DRC2003-00850 Comoletion Date Q. R. Construction Notes for Street Trees ~~- 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may requue backfdl soil . amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only 7 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with ~~- adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all prolect Local residential street intersections and commercial or intersections, including driveways industrial driveways may have Imes of sight plotted as required 8 A permit shall be obtained from Caltrans for any work within the following right of-way: ~~- Eastbound 210-Freeway on-ramp. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall _JJ- besubmitted tothe City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance The following landscaped parkways, medians, f t irs . of building permits, whichever occurs paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance Distract Haven Avenue (behind Lots 6 and 7 only) 2. Public landscape areas are regwred to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble or ~~- other acceptable non-irrigated surtaces 3. A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting or to final map approval or issuance of bwiding ~~- Distncts shall be filed with the City Engineer pri permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. ~ 4 All regwred public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the ~~ developer until accepted by the City. 5 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective ~~-. Beautification Master Plan Haven Avenue. Drainage and Flood Control 1. The project (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone, therefore, flood protection a registered Crvd Engineer and approved by the City rtified b d ~~- y as ce measures shall be provide Engineer. 2 It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone'A' designation removed ~~- . from the prolect area. The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection taalities The developer's engineer shall prepare all t ' ' ion. designa X suftiaent to obtain an unshaded plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations A Conditional Letter of Map necessary reports , Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or tssuance of A Letter of Map Revision (CONK) shall be issued by t f . irs bulding permits, whichever occurs ancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. occu t p o FEMA prior 3. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the Crty Engineer prior to f anal map e faalities shall t All draina f ~~ g irs approval or the issuance of budding permits, whichever occurs be installed as regwred by the City Engineer. 4. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the ~~- property from adjacent areas. • SC-1-04 i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003.00850 conds 4.28 doc 9 E-~8 Protect No DRC2003-00850 Completion Date S. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCW D is requred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subfect to any requirements that may be received from them. T. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the lust six months of operation, prior to final map approval or priorto bulding permit issuance if no map is involved 2 Prior to the issuance of budding permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable rf at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division when the test building permit application is submitted to Bwlding and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: U. Security Lighting All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-toot candle power. These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, wdh direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. V. Security Hardware 1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors. 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are wdhu 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 3 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices SC-1-04 10 - i \planning\tinal\pingcommWrc2003-00850 contls 4-28 tloc ~ ~[ / - -~-~- ~-~- ~~- ~, ~J- ~~- ~~- ~J- JJ- ~~- JJ- ~~- ~~- Project No DRC2003-00850 Comolenon Date 4 All roof openings giving access to the bwiding shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, ~~_ or alarmed. W. Security Fencing 1 All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the police ~~_ with a keypad access and a unique code The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Cnme Prevention Unit along with plans If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police wa the 24-hour dispatch center at (909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Cnme Prevention Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475. X. Windows 1. All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking dewces and should not be able to be Irfted ~~_ from frame or track in any manner. Y. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime J~_ wsibdity. Z. Alarm Systems 1 Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm rf needed. Instructing management and ~~_ employees on the operation of the alarm system wrfl reduce the amount of false alarms and fn tum save dollars and Irves. 2. Alarm companies shall be provided wtth the 24-hour Sheriff's dispatch number. (909) 941-1488. ~~~ APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED ~~ Sc-1-04 i \plannmg\final\pGgcomm\dre2003-00850 conds 4.28 doc ~ 1 ~~ • RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS February 12, 2004 Aim All Self Storage SEC Haven & SR-210 DRC2003-00850 & SUBTPM16648 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design gwdelmes for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design gwdelmes for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants m commerc~al/mdustnal protects ~s 300-feet No portion of the extenor wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b. Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: • 1. At the entrance(s) to a commeraal, mdustnal or residential protect from the pubhc roadways 2. At intersections. 3. On the nght side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As required by the Fire Safety Drvrs~on to meet operational needs of the Fire D~stnct 5 A rmmmum of forty-feet (40') from any building. c. If any portion of a fac~l~ty or building ~s located more than 150-feet from a pubhc fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the extenor of the fac~l~ty or building, additional pnvate or pubhc fire hydrants and mains capable of supplyrng the required fire flow shall be provided. d. Provide one fire hydrant fot each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The requred rmmmum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire spnnklers are installed ~s 3750 gallons per rrunute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire spnnkler system m accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monrtonng. This regmrement ~s made m accordance with the Cahfomia Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Frre D~stnct Ordinances. 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed proiect may be used to provide the regmred fire flow subject to Fire D~stnct review and approval. Pnvate fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide regmred fire flow. 3. Firewater plans are required for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 4 On all site plans to be subrmtted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems ~ si 1 Pnor to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire spnnkler system, [he applicant shall submit plans, speafications and calculations for the fire spnnkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained pnor to submitting the overhead • fire spnnkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distnct Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standazds require an approved automatic fire spnnkler system to be installed rn• 1 Commeraal or industnal structures greater than 7,500 square feet FSC-5 Fire Alarm System 1. Based on the number of spnnkler heads; the spnnkler system is required to monitored by a listed central station fire alarm system FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Frre Distnct access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as pnvate roads, streets dnve aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lanes Standard #F191 10.200. 1 Location of Access: All portions of the structures ls` story extenor wall shall be located within 150- feet of Fire Drstnct vehicle access, measure on an approved route azound the extenor of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes rn elevation, gates and fences aze deemed obstrocUOns. 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: a. The rrummum unobstructed width rs 26-feet. b. The maximum inside loin radius shall be 20-feet. c The minimum outside loin radius shall be 46-feet. d. The minimum radius for col-de-sacs is 45-feet. e. The rrummum vertical clearance rs 14-feet, 6-inches. f At any pnvate entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the dnving surface shall not exceed 12°k. i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). ~. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trammed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Frre Department apparatus Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provrded as follows: a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provrded rn accordance with the 2001 Cahfomia Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provrded m each 1001mea1 feet or mayor fraction thereof, of the extenor wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways aze tstalled provisions shall be made to maintain Frre Distract access to all requrred openings 4 Access Wakkways• Hnsdscaped access walkways shall be provrded from the fire apparatus access road to all requrred building extenor openings. 5. CommerciaUindustrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Frre Department access road shall be rn accordance with Frre Distract Standadd #9-2. The following design requirements apply: a. The gate shall be motonzed and slide open honzontally or swing rnwazd b. All gates must open at the rate of one second for each one-foot of requrred width. c. When fully open, the minimum width shall be 20-feet Ewa 2 - u d Gates are not required to be motonzed 6 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A srte plan . illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fve Distnct standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check subrruttal is required with the pernut application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required pnor to penrut issuance. General Use Permit shall be regnired for any activity or operation not specifically descnbed below, which m the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property • Aerosol Products • Magnesium Working • Application of Flammable Finishes • Battery Systems Organic Coating • Ovens • Cellulose Nitrate • Powder Coating • Compressed Gases • Cryogenics • Radioactive Matenals • Dust-Producing Processes and Operations • • Refngeration Systems • Explosive or Blasting Agents • Flammable and Combustible Liquids • Fruit Ripening Plants • Spraying or Dipping Operations • Hazardous Matenals • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • High-Pile Combustible Storage (HPS) • Tire Storage • Liquefied Petroleum Gases Welding and Cutting Operations LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles m Assembly Buildings Wood Products/Lumber Yards FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards. Contact the San Bemardmo County Fire, Hazardous Matenals Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance. The County Fire Department iS the C31/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building & Safety will not be • finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. California Government Code, Section 65850.2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific ~~3 3 hazardous matenals disclosure requirements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility 2 Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is required to submit a Plan, is also • required to subrrvt a notice to the owner of the property m wntmg stating that the busmess is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved pnor to conswction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous matenals in accordance with the 2001 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electncal Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FDIS and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire Distnct "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: hall submit conswction plans t l i , ican s 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems. The app d calculations for the pnvate water main system for review and t a t d a n a specifications, flow tes approval by the Fire Distnct Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distnct Standazds Approval of the on-site (pnvate) fire underground and water plans is required pnor to any building pernvt issuance for any swcture on the site Pnvate on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standazds # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Conswction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. Al] pnvate on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delrvenng any combustible frarrung matenals to the site. Fire conswction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. Public Water Supply (DomestidFire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the 2 . locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standazd # and #9-5 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivenng any combustible framing matenals to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Conswction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Conswction Services must grant a cleazance before lumber is dropped Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of 3 . the RCFPD Fire Lane Standazd #9-7 Al] temporary utilrties_over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. ~ sy 4 4. Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building consttvction must be substantially completed m accordance with Ftre Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement mazker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or dnveway in accordance with the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga +, Engtneenng Standazd Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Mazkeis" On pnvate property, the mazkeis shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant ]ocatton. ' 2. Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed spnrtkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Servtces, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responstble for htnng the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Servtces venfying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow m accordance with the Cahfomia Fire Code 3. Fire Sprinkler System. Pnor to the issuance Df a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire spnnkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Ftre Construction Services 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring• Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire spnnkler monttonng system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire spnnkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire spnnkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazazd protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Ftre Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed m service. 6. Fire Alarm System. Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehiculaz gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standazds #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Pnor to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancytthe fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Servtces The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit pazking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways 9. Address: Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commerciaUindustnal and multi- fanulybuildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electncally illuminated dunng penods of dazkness. When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance. Larger address numbeis will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks mmulti-tenant commercial and mdustnal buildings The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all swtes _- - ~~~ 4 10. Hazardous Materials Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (m venting from the County) that the faciluy has met or is meeting the Rtsk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Matenals/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division. The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Ftre Constroction Services. 11. Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form Thts form provides contact information for Fire Distract use m the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Ftre Construction Services Inspector. 12. Mapping Site Plan: Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'/i' x 11" or I1" x 17" site plan of the site m accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required m the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector ~' -~~o 6 Jdrl lb Ub UJ:S/f~ H11'I HLL b1UKHUt I'IHrIVI'll MIKE GIUIZBINO A S S O C I A T E S January I , 2006 Mr Dan lemon Gry of cho Cucamonga 10500 Cr w Center Dnve Rancho C camonga, Caltfonua 91629 Ibual ago-ll~b F+•1 CITY pF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ AN ~ " 2006 ~~`rN'^~ -PLANNING Re Alm ~11i Storage 210, LLC - 6599 Haven Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga This Is wl ere we are wlllr the Issues that were discussed m the meeting of January 12th, 2005 m your office have retained the sernces of Raskrn Engmeenng to design a footing and wall to aaommodatc the closu of the sound wall to full height We are m hopes that thrs can be completed by the end of February On Fnda January 13Ur, vve were on site to deal wnh the fight rssue We have removed every other bulb, and bloc ned the Ierlses so that they only shine down on the rest Hopefully. this wdl remedy the fighting rssue The hom owner at 6550 Vahnda, Mrs Eileen Crowe, was contacted by Mtke Tormey He tnfonned her of what ~ e were doing to try and resolve these Issues Dunng this conversation she was offered to have her wind ws tinted and solar screen mslalled to help reduce her Issues with glare She felt that this might work and ems gong to contact the person who installed her wtndovvs to see Mike Tormey requested that she Ict know d n was acceptable as soon as possible m order drat arrangements could be made to get the work erfonncd u 11m All Storage 10590 AVagnoha Ave Riverside, C4 92505 Ph (Q~) 351-1163 Fav ( ) 353-1149 Cell ({3H9j-59r1-?72 Sure F EXHIBIT I E-~~ • • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP AGENDA ~UCAMONGA JANUARY 25, 2006 - 7:00 PM " Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Chairman Stewart Vice Chairman Macias Fletcher _ McNiel_ McPhail_ II. NEW BUSINESS A PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2005-01092 -RICHARD DICK & ASSOCIATES - A review of conceptual plans for a commercial center comprised of four buildings with a combined floor area of about 118,000 square feet for a home improvement store, food service, and vanous standard/medical offices in the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park in the Industnal Park (IP) Distract, Subarea 7, located at the south side of Foothill Boulevard, at Mayten Avenue -APN 0229-011-87-92 B PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2005-01094 -WORKFORCE HOMEBUILDERS LLC - A conceptual review of 170 work force apartment homes located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard west of Center Avenue m the Community Commercial Distract of the Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 3) -APN 1077-601-02, 03, 04 III. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time and place for fhe general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda IV. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m ad~oumment time If dems go beyond that 6me, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA JANUARY 25, 2006 •u'~CONGA 2 1, Lois J Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certt(y that a true, accurate copy o(the foregoing agenda was posted on January 19, 2006, at least 72 hours poor to the meeting perGovemment Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga ~~ If you need speaal assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Division at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ® ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired -.J • Vicinity Map Planning Commission Workshop January 25, 2006 • N A i!'C Meeting Location Rancho Cucamonga Clty Hall 10500 Clwc Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 /\/ City Boundary (as of 12/20/2005) ~~' SPHERE OF INFLUENCE Charles Joseph Associates PUBLIC/PRIVATE SECTOR MANAGEMENT SERVICES January 25, 2006 Dan Coleman, Clty Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P O Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-0807 Re Alm All Storage Conditional Use Permit - DRC2003-00850 Dear Mr Coleman .~aN 2 5 2006 RECEIVED -PLANNING Thank you for the fax transmittal this morning of a letter you received from a neighboring resident yesterday afternoon, and a copy of that letter was forwarded to Mike Giurbino by our office for his review and information As we have discussed previously, our scope of involvement with the Alm All Storage project included assisting Aim All Storage with their Design Review and Conditional Use Permit review and approval process for their Haven Avenue protect, and these services were completed in Apnl 2004 Our client then proceeded with the building plan check process and construction of the City-approved protect on their own, and we had no further or direct Involvement with their protect activity following completion of the Design Review and CUP approval process Following your contact with my office In late December 2005, we reviewed the materials and information you provided relative to neighbor concemsand/or complaints that had been directed to the City Subsequent to that review, we made contact with Mr Giurbino and facilitated a meeting with you and he on January 11, 2006 at your office, at which you and Mr Giurbino discussed the outstanding concerns and Issues and agreed to a course of action based on that meeting discussion I also saw a copy of a fax that he had sent to you following that meeting providing you with an update as to his follow-up activity that you were kind enough to forward to our office for our Information I have also reviewed the Planning Commission staff report and recommendation to allow Mr Giurbino a penod of 60 days to complete his follow-up activity as agreed at the January 11, 2006 meeting, and believe he should be afforded this opportunity In light of his willingness to work with the neighbors and Clty to address and resolve reasonable and feasible concerns Please feel free to contact me at your earliest opportunity should you have any questions or need of additional Information or assistance with this matter Sincerely, uck Buquet Charles Joseph Associates Office 909.481.1822 800.240.1822 Fax 909.481.1824 Ctty Center • 70681 Foothill Blvd , Sutte 395 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA • 91730 A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGR r c'.'l ~ Aim All Storage * Early summer 2003- Notice of Fling sign was posted for notification of project and Development Code Amendment * September 11`h 2003 Letter received from City regarding opposition to project from Eileen Crowl (Exhibit 5) * September 15th 2003, CJA provided a written response, project site plan reductions and information mailed to Eileen Crowl providing opportunity to meet regarding concerns (Exhibit 5) * September 24th, 2003 Planning Commission Meeting Notices were marled prior to this meeting to property owners by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Eileen Crowl, June Selos, and Trina Stone attended Planning Commission meeting and spoke into the record- Minutes attached (See Exhibit 1) Planning Commission approved the initiation of the amendment and was forwarded to City Council (Exhibit 1) November 5th 2003, City Council Notices were mailed prior to this meeting to property owners by the City of Rancho Cucamonga including Eileen Crowl, June Selos, and Trina Stone for City Council regarding the staff report for the Development Code Amendment and the record does not show the neighbors attending this meeting March 1 2004, Notices mailed for March 11, 2004 for neighborhood meeting to Property owners by the Charles Joseph Associates Eileen Crowl, June Selos, and Trina Stone attended meeting and signed meeting sheet (See exhibit 2) During that meeting City staff and applicant informed the neighbors this matter would be going forward to Planning commission the following month (Exhibit 2) April 28th 2004, Planning Commission (Exhibit 3) Notices were mailed prior to this meeting to property owners of surrounding property, including Eileen Crowl, June Selos, and Trina Stone for this meeting We have attached a copy of the mailing labels mailed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga with highlights of the neighbors (See exhibit 6) The City also posted notice on Notice of filing sign None of the neighbors attended this meeting. No appeal was filed for this project. This concluded our scope of services for this project. -~.. Commissioner McPhail recused herself from acting on Item A as her fine receives remuneration from the applicant Motion: Moved by Fletcher, seconded by McNiel, to adopt Item A of the Consent Calendar. Motion tamed by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, MACIAS, McNIEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: STEWART -tamed ABSTAIN: McPHAIL ..... K DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-00709 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES- A proposed amendment to the text of the Development Code to allow self-storage facilities within residential zones, under specific circumstances, with the approval df a conditional use pertnk. Debra Meier, Assodate Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Madas opened the public hearing. Chuck Buquet, Charles Joseph Assodates, 10681 Foothill Boulevard, #395, Rancho~ucamonga, Stated they had been approached to change the 7-acre parcel located on the east side of Haven Avenue immediately south of the 210 Freeway eastbound on-ramp to retail commensal, which would _ allow service stations and fast food ,but they could not support that use. He said they have had r lot of experience with self-storage facility design and development and this ske is now owned by the people who did the self-storage project at Artow Highway and Hermosa Avenue. He stated tha project is adjacent to residential property and the design and orientation and limked hours of operation have made that awin/win skuation. He was not aware of any complaints. He explained, they were not requesting a change of the zoning of the property so no other commercial uses could be placed there. He reported they have filed a specific project and plan to build the storage faalky on one portion of the ske and single-famiy homes on the remainder of the ske. He said the seH- storage fadlky would be to the north, oriented toward Haven Avenue. He indicated they intend to meet with the neighbors and solicit input on the design. He pointed out the Development Code Amendment would protect the underlying use. He noted this would be a C'dy-wide Development Code Amendment and said he has a ske at the 210 and 15 Freeways that he also believed is not conducive to single-family residential uses even though k is zoned for residential. :. Eileen Growl, 6550 Valinda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, stated this would be in her backyard. She said she aNvays dreamed of another famiy living behind her house. She fek they are a communky oriented neighborhood. She stated her next door neighbor is along the freeway on-ramp, her house is kitty comer to the on-ramp, and there are houses on Dakota Avenue that bads up to Haven Avenue. She observed they all have to live with the noise and are doing fine. She stated they are putting in new windows and she wondered why homes could not be put on the parcel and the sound wall continued. She said Haven Avenue and 19th Street currenty has a lot of traffic. She said U-__ _ _ turns are not permitted when heading south on Haven Avenue at 19th Street but people constantly make u-turns. She asked how southbound traffic would get into a storage unk wkhout making a U- tum at 19th Street. She said her husband is a Los Angeles County Sheriff and he fek storage units are used by a transient population, as people in their neighborhood store items in their garages. She feared problems with crime and illegal substances. June Selos, 6542 Valinda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, expressed concern about the wordage and asked the meaning of "conditional use" and "under spedfic conditions." She said theywrote a letter and Charles Joseph Associates responded and said that this was the ony use that could be contemplated with the proximity of the freeway and assodated noise and traffic droulation needs of -10- September 24, 2003 Planning Commission Minutes the site because the site is not conduGVe to single-family residential development. She asked why they are then planning to build eight houses on the site. She was concerned about the value of her home and said they are dealing with noise and light. She said Mr. Buquet's comment that he knows of another site made it sound like this will be a blueprint for other protects in the City. She noted that Rancho Cucamonga is growing fast and she felt k is not always to the betterment of local neighborhoods. Trina Stone, 6610 Valinda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, was concerned about what people keep in their storage fadlities, the hours of operation, increased traffic because of u-hauls trying to make U- tums or making illegal u-turns on 19th Street inmid-block. She said it was zoned for residential and she did not feel it would be good to have self-storage. She stated someone wanted to build a churd~ there a few years ago and she felt that would have fit in better but she thought someone had said the City would not rezone for a church. She thought the noise from the doors on the storage units during late hours will be a nuisance. She was offended that the letter from Charles Joseph Associates said the area is not condudve to residential development because their homes have been there for 30 years. She asked that the Commission seriously consider the request since it will affect many residents in the City who have already been adversey affected by the 210 Freeway. Mr. Buquet stated he appredated the comments made by the residents. He said no offense was intended by the comment that the area is not condudve to residential development and k is merely a technical term. He stated it has more to do with environmental impacts assoaated with the freeway and Haven Avenue noise. He noted the City has recently been holding meetings concerning noise issues adjacent to the freeway. He said they propose aself-storage fadlity designed to be fully contained and accessed off Haven Avenue. He stated that self-storage fadlities generate less traffic than single-family residential, multi-family residential, industrial, or commercial uses. He said the hours of operation would be primarily daytime hours. He explained they plan residential on the south side of the site so that there would not be an intertace with one side of the street being aself-storage fadlity and the other side of the street being residential fadng the storage. He said that garages at homes are designed and intended for storage of vehides, not materials and the demand for self- storage is growing. He indicated the self-storage fadlity would be monitored 24 hours per day. He explained they would still need to process any development and there will be an opportunity for neighborhood input during that process. He said storage of hazardous materials and illidt activities would not be condoned and vehide repairs could not take place there. He stated he has 18 years of experience with the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department. Hearing no further testimony, Chairman Madas dosed the public hearing. Brad Buller, City Planner, darified that there is another proposal fora mini-storege in the Etiwanda Spedfic Plan area as alluded to by Mr. Buquet. He said the action before the Commission this evening would only apply to the Development Code and would not apply to the Etiwanda Spedfic Plan, but it would be applicable to consider a change in the Etiwanda Spedfic Plan area if this concept is supported. Commissioner McPhail stated the Commission was voting on the opportunity for such projects to be considered, but not a spedfic development. She thought an approval of the Development Code Amendment would not mean they would necessarily approve the specified land to be used in that way. Mr. Buller confirmed that was correct. He said this is the land use action and a spedfic project would need to be reviewed as a land entitlement action with a separate hearing. Chairman Madas stated they were considering an amendment to the Development Code to make the use more flexible. Planning Commission Minutes -11- September 24, 2003 Mr. Buller explained the conditional use pertnrt process and said that approval of the Code Amendment would only enable someone to request that use, it would not approve any project. He said the spedal conditions needed for this use to be considered would mean the Commission would feel the need for an alternative buffer between a major noise generator, such as a freeway, and either existing or future residences. He explained that under the conditional use pemdt process, they would look at that spedfic criteria as well as other criteria that would make it compatible with the neighborhood. He stated the Commission would not be obligated to approve any request if it could not determine compatible through public testimony, conditions, dreulation, design, etc. He said the residents will have every right to raise questions and issues should that application move forward. Commissioner McPhail stated that when the concept was presented to the Commission previously, it was fek they want to be flexible in opportunities to enrich the community. However, she fek the particular property menboned this evening may or may not be appropriate and she was not yet convinced it would be a good use. She felt the conditions that would make it more palatable may not be acceptable to the applia3nt. She said it would have to be a superior facility. She supported the Development Code Amendment. Commissioner McNiel also supported the amendment. He observed there are several such faaTities in the community and he felt the use is probably the least intrusive of any function in the community. • He said it does not allow small manufacturing to occur and the hours are limited. He fek k would be preferable to have the use in residential areas because the residents use the fadlities. Commissioner Fletcher stated his ofTia: is off Arrow Route and there are numerous such fadlflies along that area. He agreed they generate much less traffic than retail or residential. He felt the amendment will provide flexibility for what is benefictal to the community and it would not be detrimental. He noted this action would not approve a spedfic project, but would make conditions flexible. He said the City has a strong history of dosey regulating cond~ional use permits. Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Fletcher, to adopt the resolution recommending Development Code Amendment DRC2003-00709. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, MACIAS, McNIEL, McPHAIL NOES: NONE - cartied ABSENT: STEWART L .GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00712 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Regional Center Land Use Mix Table 1111E by modifying the land use acreage ranges and the density ranges to be consistent with the approved development projects within the Regional Center that is generally bounded by Foothill Boulevard, Base Line Road, I-15 Freeway, and Day Creek Channel. In accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21166 ar Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, no subsequent or supplemental Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration is required to be prepared. Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. ----~ - - Commissioner McNiel asked if the action was a dean up item. Ms. Fong confirmed that was corned. Chairman Maaas opened the public hearing. There was no testimony and he dosed the hearing. Commissioner Fletcher asked for confirmation that this would not ina~ease total density. Brad Buller, City Planner, confirmed the total number of units remains the same. Planning Commission Minutes -12- September 24, 2003 ID D.~-/ I - ZDOt/ ~,ull ~ ~gAht - ,• =;in~ P,II Storage Ce„~~~~ur~;*y i~J1eeting S~rr~ I.. 5~~~~, Name Address Phone # ' ~~ ~ red io i o ; ~ 39s ~ ~ y~i~g ~ 3 u' /~5,~ 5 6 /T y~ S~~ ~V ~~ ~ ~~~.1 ~ LU / /~U 7 f~~ SNCrcwoo~ (y(o(o(a .DAKn-rf+ Aul~ /~ L, 9'f~-o3S 9 8 i~ 9 GcJ ~~J vt"( 1 So ( ~ ~~lo~I 1o J I/ ~ SGIo 5 / ~5'f2 U~-nd~. 9~5'3(~~' 11 ~,,~AyNE+ AR G0O I~AG~N~A i4v~ 909 9s~1 s' 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 J ~., Charles Joseph Associates PUBLIC/PRIVATE SECTOR MANAGEMENT SERVICES March 1.2004 Dear Property Owner Re Community Meeting for Conditional Use Permit DRC 2003-00850-AIM ALL Storage and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT 16648 located south of the Interstate 210 and Haven Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga Dear Property Owner This letter is to invite you to a Community Meeting concerning a Proposed Public Storage Facility of 187,000 square feet on 5 96 acres of land and a request to subdivide 7 68 acres of land into seven single family lots, located south of the Interstate 210 Freeway on the east side of Haven Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga This meeting well give us the opportunity to share with you our plans for this Public Storage Facility and 7 Single Family lots we believe will be a positive addition to your neighborhood, and to discuss the specifics of this protect and to answer any questions that you may have with regard to this protect We appreciate you taking time out of your busy schedule on Thursday, March 11, 2004 at 6 00 P M to loin us at Lions Center East, 9191 Baseline Road, located on the southeast corner of Lion Street and Baseline The meeting will be held in the Thomas Room We are looking forward to meeting with you Should you have any questions or need any additional information in advance of this meeting, please feel free to give me a call at your earliest opportunity Sincerely, Charles J Buquet Charles Joseph Associates Enclosure cc Debra Meier, Clty Planning Office 909.481.1822 888.240.1822 Fax 909.481.1824 Cny Center • 10681 Foothill Blvd , Swte 395 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA • 91730 A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION r • rcel Ma SUBTPM16480 ~nnth modification to require that the Planning Commission approve the P C RS Motion carried by the following vote: AYE FLETCHER, MACIAS, McPHAIL, STEWART NOES: NONE ABSENT: cNIEL -carried ..... C. TENTATIVE PA EL MAP SUBTPM16089 - DOWDING - A request to subdrvide 2.135 aces of land into 3 single-fa ily lots in the Very Low Residential Distnd (.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the north s of Wilson Avenue, approximately 330 feet east of Hermosa Avenue - APN: 1074261-03. Tre Removal Permit DRC2003-00529. Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner, p ented the staff report. Chairman Madas opened the public hea Carl Kobbins, 8880 Benson Avenue, Suite 0, Montclair, stated he was the engineer and represented the applicant. He agreed with the pro sed conditions of approval. Commrssioner Stewart asked what would happen to the xisting house. Mr. Kobbins replied they are rehabilitating it and he thought t applicant intends to Irve in it. Hearing no further testimorry, Chairman Maaas dosed the public aring. Commissioner Stewart felt the application was very straightforward. Motion: Moved by Stewart, seconded by McPhail, to adopt the resolution roving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16089. Motion cartied by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, MACIAS, McPHAIL, STEWART NOES: NONE ABSENT: McNIEL D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16648 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES/AIM ALL STORAGE - A request to subdivide 7.77 acres of land into seven single family residential lots totaling 1.64 acres and one remainder parcel of 6.13 acres for the purpose of developing a public storage fadlity located in the Low Residential Distnd (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast comer of Haven Avenue and the east 210 Freeway on-ramp -APN: 1076-331-02 and 1076-341-01. Related Fles: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00850 and Variance DRC2004-00050. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00850 - CHARLESJOSEPH ASSOCIATES/AIMALL STORAGE -A request to develop a public storage faclity of 185,491 square feet, along with 3,597 square feet for the manager's office and __ _ _ apartment, on 6.13 acres in the Low Residential Distnd (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast comer of Haven Avenue and the east 210 Freeway on-ramp -APN: 1076-331-02 and 1076-341-01 (a portion). Related files: Tentative Trad Map SUBTT16648 and Variance DRC2004-00050. ~'~ F. VARIANCE DRC200400050 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES/AIM ALL STORAGE - A request for a reduction in setback to 0 feet along the south and east boundaries, related to the development of a public storage facility on 6.13 acres in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast comer of Haven Avenue and the eastbound Planning Commission Minutes -4- April 28, 2004 A+ 210 Freeway on-ramp - APN: 1076-331-02 and 1076-341-01 (a portion). Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16648 and Conditional Use Perna DRC2003-00850. Brent Le Count, Associate Planner, presented the staff report Chairman Macias stated it was his understanding that the Commission was being asked to approve the project but not the proposed signage. Mr. Le Count affirmed that was correct. He said the resolution contained a condition prohibiting signs on the north elevation. Commissioner Fletcher asked if there are existing fences on the east and west side. Mr. Le Count replied there is a block wall about 6 feet high. Chairman Macias opened the public hearing. Chuck Buquet, Charles Joseph Associates, 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 395, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he represented Aim All Storage. He noted it is the same developer who constructed the project at the comer of Arrow Route and Hermosa Avenue. He recalled that the Cily was skeptical about compatibility when that project was buiR but he feR it proved that such a use is compatible with residential areas. He stated this project will only have indoor storage and people wi0 not be able to work in the units. He believed the design of the project creates a buffer between the freeway and the existing residential area. He stated the hours will be limited and the ony access to the storage area will be from Haven Avenue. He said they propose single famiy residential along the east side of the project to complement the houses across the street He noted the north elevation will be seen from the freeway and said they were trying to work with planning staff to create a quasi feeling of a City entryway. He indicated his Gient proposed one sign on the north elevation with his first choice being on the tower and his second choice further east Mr. Buquet said the site is depressed and they are exporting 30,000 cubic yards of soil from the site to lower the buildings to a maximum of 234 feet above the existing walls. He indicated they agreed with the conditions of approval other than Planning Condition 8 prohibiting signs faang the freeway and said that no issue was raised about the signs until the second Design Review Committee meeting. He showed an exhibit that depicted the relationship of the building to the freeway on-ramp, showing that a sign 29 feet high at the top of the sign would only be 12-14 feet above the freeway grade. He asked that Planning Condition 8 be deleted to allow them to work with staff regarding the signs and said they were merely trying to identify the building for the convenience of their customers. He said they are not asking for a median break and noted that people exiting the freeway will have to go south and make a u-tum to enter the project. He stated there is freeway signage along the 210 Freeway. He indicated they were asking to be able to place a tasteful anthftecturel sign of an appropriate size that would be visible from the freeway. Mr. Buquet stated his client and the civil engineer were present and available to answer questions. _ _ Commissioner Fletcher asked if there would be enhancements to the neighbors' walls. Mr. Buquet replied their building walls will be next to the residents' walls but they have lowered the site as much as possible. He said they are woridng with the neighbors and are willing to put in an extra course or two of blocks on the existing walls ff the wall structure will support it Commissioner Fletcher noted the plans show four signs including the monument sign. Mr. Buquet replied the drawings are incorrect and they know they are limited to a monument sign and two building signs. He said they are not requesting a sign facing the residential on the east orsouth, but rather want a monument sign, a sign on the tower of the west elevation and one on the tower on the elevation faang the freeway. He said they would work with staff. j~1.~1 i. •{ \ ~ "+ ~. ~S ,. ;";, ~~ y, Planning Commission Minutes -5- April 28, 2004 ,~- Heanng no further testimony, Chairman Madas dosed the public heanng. Commissioner McPhail stated she had seen the protect in several iterations. She said she has been reluctant about the protect since the beginning but Noll tolerate it because it has been pointed out that it makes a good buffer from the freeway. She was not impressed with the street frontage along Haven Avenue and felt the architecture is satisfactory She did not want any signs on the northern elevation fadng the freeway and said it had been discussed in Design Review. She agreed it is a good land use. Commissioner Stewart felt it is a good project and a great use for the land because it provides an excellent buffer and she liked that the existing homes would have homes across from them. She shared staffs concerns regarding the signage on the elevabon facing the freeway. She feared that if signs are permitted on this probed, it well open Pandora's box and there will be an issue of where the line should be drawn. She thought the use is community onented, rather than freeway onented She believed people will not be traveling on the freeway looking for some place to store items, but rather people from the community will go there for the service. Commissioner Fletcher agreed the building is archkecturally strong and aesthetically pleasing. He liked the fact that ft buffers the existing residential use from the freeway With respect to freeway- oriented signage, espedally along the 210 corridor, he felt rt is important for the community and for business that are ludry enough to locate along freeway frontage to have brand identity. He felt the signs proposed are subtle and the location identity will serve both the project owner and consumers who want to get there. He did not think the prohibition for freeway-oriented signs is contrary to the Code but felt k is rather a policy issue. He felt it was tastefully done and observed it is on the side of the building. He was willing to approve a sign fadng the freeway and thought there should be further discussion regarding signs. Chairman Madas felt it is fundamentally a good project and provides a good buffer. He believed the applicant has improved the project. He was concerned about signage along the 210 Freeway corridor and opening up Pandora's box; however, he did not have a problem with the signage as shown on the north side. He indicated he trusted staff to work with the applicant and believed the applicant has a good record of doing tasteful development. He noted that would mean a 2-2 tie wrath respect to the signage. Commissioner McPhail asked if it was possible to approve the project without approving the signs and bong the signs back. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the Commission could approve the project and bring back the sign issue when there is a full Commission. He confirmed it is a policy, not the Code, which prohibits signs facing the 210 Freeway. He reiterated that staff has been approached by other businesses and churches asking for signs when they have frontage or even a wall fadng the freeway. He stated staff would need diredion from the Commission to make an interpretation as to what types of uses may be allowed to have signs; i.e., a housing project, church, business, service to the community, etc. He said staff would need diredion overall because it is likely there will be more requests once there is an interpretation that the freeway rs a street frontage, therefore permitting signage. He suggested Planning Condition 8 could be dropped and Planning Condition 9 could be modified to regwre that signs shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. Chairman Madas suggested the Commission move forward and have discussions regarding that policy issue He agreed with Commissioner Stewart that the use rs a community based function but he felt the freeway has a different fundron from the community. He said he would potentially consider some altematrves to the current policy on freeway signage but he did not want it to lead to a sea of neon signs along the freeway. In the interest of being business friendly he did not oppose some tasteful signage along the freeway because he did not think that would have a major impact. Planning Commission Minutes -6- Apnl 28, 2004 Motion Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Siewart, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the resolutions approving Tentative Tract Map SUBTT1648, Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00850, and Vanance DRC2004-00050 with modification to require the signs be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission Motion tamed by the following vote AYES FLETCHER, MACIAS, McPHAIL, STEWART NOES NONE -tamed ABSENT McNIEL ..... Commissioner McPhail left meeting at 8 03 p m ..... NEW BUSINESS G CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DR 004-00201 -FRED SANCHEZ - An appeal of the City Planners deasion denying a req st for the removal of a Mexican Fan palm tree at 7638 Pepper Street - APN: 0208-711-1 Dan Coleman, PnnGpal Planner, presented the staff report Chairman Maaas invited public comment Fred Sanchez, 1512 North Glen Avenue, Ontane, stateo h tree needs to be tnmmed and there is only one other such tree in the neighborhood He said h spoke to the neighbor who has the tree, and he indicated he would like to remove his tree b he cannot afford to do so Mr Sanchez commented he wants to put in aslumpstone walla the tree is in the way He said he wants to beautify the house that has been vacant for 5 year He reported it would cost between $500-$700 to tnm the tree and he did not believe he should veto pay that amount of money to maintain a tree he doesn't even like He said all the neighbo agree he should be able to remove the tree He noted that when he applied for the Tree Rem vat Permit, he obtained a listing of contractors and he thought the tree could be transplanted to industnal area He said he was willing to cooperate to have a budder move the tree He indi d he would like to place a shade tree elsewhere on the property Mr Coleman indicated that the Tre reservation Ordinance is very specific that the tree should be preserved in place if it is healthy a said the Ordinance also allows the tree to be transplanted on site as a second altematrve and he last resort is removal of tree and/or transplanting the tree off- site He noted a replacement a would be approwmately $2,000 Commissioner Stewart said he deeply respects the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance, but she felt it is incumbent to conside d on a case-by-case basis She indicated she visited the site and the owner wants to put in a ock wall fence and he does not want to substitute wrought iron in order to save the tree eecaus he applicant stated he was willing to have a construction crew remove the tree for use elsewhere she said she favored allowing removal of the tree in this instance She did not feel the tree is ve attractive Commissioner iiet nt s 9merovmth them roiseionea~St the streetscape a He thought there ould evident the app P 9 P P rtY probably be a market for the tree He said he did not agree with staffs findings with respect to Cntena 2 and 3, the lack of necessity to remove the tree in order to construct improvements and the effect the removal of the tree would have on the established character of the area He noted the tree is close to the douse and he did not wish to force the applicant to use a wrought iron fence where he wants a block wall Commissioner Fletcher observed there was only one other such tree in the block _7_ Apnl 28, 2004 Planning Commission Minutes ~ „r,. ' Coleman C17Y OF fi~,iu~nG CUCAfJIONGA s 50 Va nda Ave r ~ncho Cucamonga Planning Dept Rancho Cucamonga, CA pp Box 807 hQV Q 7 2~~~ 91737 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91729 ~~clt~~=c - FLP.cIR!tNG Wednesday November 2, 2005 (' Dear Mr. Coleman and the Planning Dept I am venting to ask thecPlcaanli ~ Aim All Storageo rl amVrep eentng the resi dents of~ he 6542-6610at 6599 Haven Ave, spe Y of Val nda Ave feel that the pro ed has not IgivedTup to the proms es made in the plan ng stages s t will try to state the most important points of concern and give background as to why these are still concerns. In November 2002 the 210 freeway was completed through Rancho h s ~° eg compasses the sound wall was constructed along the Haven East bound on ramp field of 6599 Haven entire back yard of 6542 Valinda and extends 50 feet west into the then empty The neighbors and 1 contacted Cal Trans SanBag and the City of Rancho Cucamonga about the fad that the chain Imk fence along the on-ramp was still very nOwould complete the sound walland a safety issue. We were told that the developer of the property Here is the first issue, complete means to continue in the same mlot to r comp ete° the ex st ng we have since 2002 been expecting any development on that empty ro eded into our - sound wall This will effectively block the remaining sound p~%bleCmo Maw ~~~~ bedrooms and back yards. S,~ Z.tlO°l ~ ~b`'"~~ In November 2003, we (the representatives for ~eazone of 6599Hevenefroms n9 ~m iy I session where a vote was bung taken to change We voiced strong concerns that this residential to a conditional use perrnd for a storage fatality change would negatively affect the current single family neighborhoodcewtnq made the comment ce since 1979. When the vote was being taken one me We ~ ttiv ~ ~ took this as a slap m the that "this area is not sudable for single family living'. had ustbeen deve oped as single fa ce homesen the selling rang o e~00,000. Ag ns our0 wishes the city council adopted the code amendment and proceeded to send the probed to planning. I attended another meeting, (I am sorry but the date is not recorded except in my memory) this were representing Aim Wand JDulne Selos Tnr na Stone and EieeenACrowl p'resertbng'the o~ey residents of Valinda Ave. Some blue pnnts were shown and discussion took place about certain We talk d foea very ong time about no se concems~, elevation concerns ~andscapmg concem'se and the effect the project as a whole would have on our quality of I'rfe. At this Ume these men seemed very reasonable and assured us that all of our cons ~ E ~ ~ addressed and that Aim All was stnvmg to be a 9°O'd~Vn~eighbor. ~` 2~ LI In May 2004, a neighborhooa ~ee~ 9 ~s finally s'ch1 eduled• This was held at the Uons Center East The Stone family, Selos family, Moore famiy and Crowl family represented the 9 affected houses on Valmda Ave and 3 families from the affected Heather St were represented ~ e resenting the Ctry of Rancho Gwrb~no, Mike Tormey representing Aim All and a woman rep Cuca~mono9 e ~ ~ ~~cems and questions.AAfter the meeting we were a cured there wou d be the fl P 1 ~-] EXHIBIT C ~~ a'' another meetmg where all the concerns would be addressed and we could see the finalized plai acs ~` This second meetmg never happened and construction began m July 2004 ~ At the Lions Center meetmg the following concerns were voiced and are still issues of concern for the neighbors 1 Mr Stone, Mr Selos and Mr Crowl asked to see specific elevations concerning construction. 2 Mr Crowl and Mr Selos asked rf the Cal Trans sound wall was going to be completed. 3 Mrs Crowl and Mrs Selos asked about the conugated roofing expressing concern that the roofing matenal would ceuse a lot of glare and noise 4 Mr Moore asked about the height of the bwldmgs that would be behind his home 5 Mrs Stone and Mrs Crowl asked about landscaping or other types of beautificeUon plans to make the look more compatible to what would be in a single family neighborhood 6 Mr Moore and Mrs Cromd asked about the lighting and how much lighting would be required and the effect it would have on their back yards Mrs Cromd asked why the bwldmgs were shown painted pink on the punts, since pink walls were not compatible moth the current homes. 8 We asked about the hours of business and the city representative said the hours would be closed at 7PM 9 We asked about traffic problems because the light at 19'" and Haven is a no U-turn and there is no access to Aim All for south bound traffic beceuse of a median down Haven Ave Mr Stone was very concerned about the "emergency' entrance to the bwlding off Heather and directly behind his home The following were the answers we were given by Aim All and the aty representative. Q 1 There will be another meetin ands T~ ~,~ ~ ZD g pedfic elevations moll be available. This meeting neVerg~ happened and in July 2004 construction started without addressing the above concerns. These elevation concerns have ceused the Moore family to have a tall add~ion to their existing wall without a pennd The lade of elevation plans caused Aim All to be allowed to install a sloping concrete wall along the south ends of the property butting up to the Stone's back yard Currently all walls on slopes in Rancho Cucemonga and specifically our neighborhood are terraced walls; the effect of this sloped wall behind the Stone's terraced wall is one of vertigo. If you walk out into the Stone's back yard you fell like you have ~ust _- had way too much to dunk. A similar wall is being buiR along Haven Ave. South of 19' and it is being terraced, so our question is,° why was this wall allowed to be sloped causing such an eyesore in the Stone's yard? G--~ • Dear Members of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, amendment to the Deve opmen . residential areas. These are the following reasons for our opposition. -.~yo ~~ '~ticy 0 ~~c~~ p j j C <a,A fip~ This letter is to state ourlunequii co e° gpecificallyt to allow self storageofac'I tie within ~9iyy~ 1) 2) ~G In the past, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has not changed the residential coding. WhY start now? If this is the case, why did the City not allow property at the South East corner of Haven and the 210 Freeway, have a church building to be built, which would allow for much more enrichment of the community than a storage unit. Is money and taxes an issue? Storage units encourage a transient population to use these storage facilities. There are very major problems with this. With San Bernardino County being called the "Methamphetamine Capital of the United States°, Why does the City want to allow the installation of facilities that could be used for these very dangerous, illegal activities? The City of Rancho Cucamonga already has a large transient population with the amount of apartment buildings that are around. That transient population is not wanted in established single family residential areas, where families have lived for over 20 years. Even though these facilities technically don't allow the storage of hazardous materials, this is a possibility. This is a danger that would put those in a residential area at risk. I personally don't want a storage unit in my back yard. Who knows who is in the f eewayel don't want more from somebody working lon ttheir boat or car om Allowing this change to happen, allows for other changes, such as allowing a gas station or 7-11 type convenience store. This brings the possibility of increased crime. • 3) 4) 5) In closing, We believe that changing the zoning in a residential area is a bad idea and bad for the residences and families that would have to live in this area. Thank you for listening. We a the zon ~ ht decision for the residents in this area. And that decision is no on changing 9• Gordon and Eileen Crowl, 19 year residents of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ ~~~~ I (pS"S~ /~~nC.4 ~ ~ ~i~ .CGYn4, ~e 9/~3~ ~~( Charles Joseph Associates PUBUCIPRIVATE SECTOR MANAGEMENT SERVICES September 15, 2003 Gordon and Eileen Crowl 6550 Valinda Avenue Alta Loma, CA 91737 Re: Development Code Amendment - DRC2003-0079 0 ,n Dear Mr. and Mrs. Crowl: This is as a follow-up to review of your correspond~e PPrethc~at the opportunity forwarded to our office for appropriate follow-up. to review your letter outlining your stated basis of objection to our project efforts and to provide you with additional inforrrration that we believe should be responsive to most of your concerns. Our office was contacted over the past co iop~~ dYalong Haven Avenue two th~ wanted to change the zoning the property as station and convenience Commercial zoning for the purpose of constructing g _ uses at this location. Our office declaU'ble use or~-the existing residential felt that this would not be a particularly comp Plannin we properties east of this site. During meetings held with City 9. suggested that this would be a site that would work well for a combination sell storage and residential developme~on ~ ~ ee dstingland use was to aamend also determined that the best p the City's Development Code to allow for self-storage uses under specific circumstances that also exist at this location. In an effort to be helpful with providing additional information concerning our project efforts to date, the following is for your review and consideration: 1. As stated in the foregoing, we are not changing the existing residential zoning of this property. We have filed a Development Code Amendment that would allow for self-storage uses within residential zoning under specific circumstances that currently exist at this location. BY amending the Code rather than changing the existing zoning, this is the only use that could be contemplated at this site other than residential development. With the proximity of the 210 Freeway and associated noise and traffic circulation needs, this site is not as conduave to single-family residential development as one might otherwise believe to be the case. A single- family development would likely result in additional traffic within the residential subdivision adjacent the site and the assoaated noise exposures from residential use. We are proposing a small number of single-family residential lots along the southern portion of our project site Office 909.481.1822 800.240.1822 Faz 909.481.1824 •91730 City Cmors • 10681 Footh~~FOxN1A Co9xPORATION Cacamongs, CA ~t~() to finish out the residential that currently exists on the south side of the . street and east of our project location. The proposed self-storage facility will have its primary access from Haven Avenue, and will be designed for orientation as such. 2. Contrary to your letter statement, self-storage uses do not encourage a transient population or use of these facilities. You should be aware by review of various news articles and discussions with some of your friends and neighbors that there is a substantial demand for self-storage faalities throughout the Southem Califomia area and in this City. The facility that will be proposed for construction will be designed to the ars of experience standards and managed by a company that has many y in the design and ownership ofself-storage fa9ilitie ~ Self-of licit activity are operated in such a manner as to discoura a an type and tenant access to the facility is controlled in such a manner so as to not allow for after hours access to the premises. The faclity contemplated at this location will have an onsite caretaker/manager, who will also be responsible for monitoring access compliance as part of their assigned duties. Self-storage uses generate the least amount of traffic trips when compared to all other residential, industrial and commercial land uses, and we have had very good experience where we have designed and constructed such projects next to existing residential properties. 3. The possibility of hazardous materials and illicit activity is normally greater . in asingle-family residential environment, where coming and going and associated activity can be internalized more so than that occurring within a monitored self-storage facility. The developer of this facility is not going to risk amufti-million dollar investment by allowing hazardous materials storage or illicit activity to occur on their premises. 4. The self-storage facility contemplated at this location will actually serve to reduce overall noise exposures from those currently experienced by the existing residential properties. The facility will be designed in such a manner as to utilize the exterior wall areas as the bads of interior storage buildings that will be designed with a profile that will help buffer existing 210 Freeway and Haven Avenue noise that will also be complimented with the landscaping that will also be a component of site design. The facllity will nom~ally operate primarily during daylight hours, so there will not be the after hours noise factors that would be associated with single and multi-family residential and commercial development at this location. Facility tenants will not be allowed to work on any vehicles on the premises, as this is a storage fadlity only. 5. Our proposed amendment contemplates nothing other than that outlined above, and the property owner designs, constructs and manages self- storage facilities throughout Southern Califomia. As such, there are no gas stations, convenience stores or other uses that would have any interest to our client. . 7 d~ • We have enclosed a copy of the self-storage facility plan materials that have been filed for this site with the City of Rancho Cucamonga for your review and information. We would like an opportunity to discuss the proposed amendment and project design with you in the near future and will be inviting you and your neighbors to a community meeting so we can share our plans for what we believe will be a positive addition to this area. Again, thank you for taking your time to share your initial concerns with the City and for reviewing this letter and accompanying endosures. Please feel free to contact me at your earliest opportunity should you have any questions or need of additional information or assistance with this matter. Sincerely. Charles J. Buquet Charles Joseph Associates Enclosures • Co; Debra Meier, City Planning Mike Giurbino, Aim All Storage • N~ Smootn teen ~nee~s••^ 1076-131-22 ARTURO & LETICIA ANDRADE 6605 MESADA ST RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-131-25 JAMES R WELLMAN 6573 MESADA ST RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-141-44 LA T WILLIAMS 6669 MESADA ST ALTA LOMA, CA 91737 1076-141-47 JOSE J DE ANDA 6635 MESADA ST RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-331-02 AIM ALL STORAGE 210 10590 MAGNOLIA F RIVERSIDE, CA 92505 1076-131-37 JEFFREY J & DEANNA FREEMAN 10472 FINCH AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-141-45 ESPERANZA G MIJARES 6657 MESADA ST RIALTO, CA 92377 1076-141-48 RUBEN R & LELIA MUEGO 6625 MESADA ST RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-331-03 LLC MdCHAEE%&. .PAULI3JE AG[IS_ 6'SB0~~7AL"SNDA~IVE ; ALTA LOMA, CA 91737 1076-331-OS YUN G & DONGSOON HEARN 6560 VALINDA AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-331-10 JOSE A CASTANEDA 6543 VALINDA AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-331-13 MICHELE E MORALES 6573 VALINDA AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-341-18 TR SHERWOOD 6676 DAKOTA AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-341-21 JAVIER JIMENEZ 6646 DAKOTA AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91737 1076-131-23 ALBERT A ROLDAN 6593 MESADA ST RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-331-06 ~GORDON-A°~EZLEETJ CROWD -6550-VALINDA AV-~ E --~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-331-11 THOMAS A & BRENDA JENKINS 6553 VALINDA AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-331-14 GLENN M WOODRUFF 10658 MANGO CT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-131-24 JOSE F & REBECCA ROMERO 6583 MESADA ST RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-131-38 M PRYOR 6561 MESADA ST RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-141-46 SCOT JAMISON 609 BRIARWOOD LN SAN DIMAS, CA 91773 1076-141-49 THOMAS A TREVITHICK 6615 MESADA ST RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-331-04 KENNETH L & CHRISTINE MAHURII 6570 VALINDA AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-331-07 LO 6542 VaA INDA AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-331-12 MICHAEL C & NANCY SPIES 6563 VALINDA AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-341-17 LUIS MEDINA 10535 RING AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-341-19 1076-341-20 G & MARILYN pWt~I .y RUSSELL A & JOYCE BECKER DAKOTA AVE "'~ 6656 DAKOTA AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-341-22 NICHOLAS R & PAMELA HOLLOWAY 6636 DAKOTA AVE ALTA LOMA, CA 91737 1076-341-23 ROBERT P & MARIA BYRNE 6348 TOPAZ ST ALTA LOMA, CA 91701 Laser 5960'"' Smooth Feed SheetsT"" 1076-341-24 ~~VID PATRICIA HUDSON 57 HEATHER ST RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-341-27 DAN BENART 10587 HEATHER ST RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-341-30 JAMES E & MARGUERITE SAUL 10617 HEATHER ST RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-341-33 LOUIS E & RUTH WESTFALL 10647 HEATHER ST RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-341-36 WALTER F & PAMELA LAPPS 10566 RING AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-341-39 PETER M & DAGMAR REINDL 10596 RING AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-341-42 ROBERT & DEBORAH QUINN 10626 RING AVE ALTA LOMA, CA 91737 1076-341-46 DENISE G NOBLETT 6620 VALINDA AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-341-49 CHULAM R MANEKIA 6590 VALINDA AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-341-52 DE W & SHIRLEY LIST 10636 HEATHER ST RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 n avErly® Address Labels 1076-341-25 JOSEPH ~ I_-`& 'BETTY~DUQUETTE 10567 HEATHER ST RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-341-28 RONALD A & MARY HLAVKA 10597 HEATHER ST RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-341-31 MICHAEL E & MARY BORGER *B* 10627 HEATHER ST RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-341-34 'Y3'~N~~+VE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-341-37 ~~ST~ _ , ~~ R~ING~A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-341-40 MARTHA A RAMIREZ 10606 RING AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-341-43 ERNEST F & MILDRED MALLOY 10636 RING AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-341-47 B WILLIAMS""~C ~~\,-~"~ 4~~rin~A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-341-50 CHUN H STEVENSON 6583 VALINDA AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-341-53 ALAN J SWARTZ 10648 HEATHER ST RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 ~~ ,ate-~,~. 1076-341-26Q~ TER_~ TRUTH-F 97-HSATfiI'R~"~''P RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-341-29 DENIS A & JUDI DUROCHER 10607 HEATHER ST RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-341-32 SHARON D OLOTOA 31S E HILLCREST BLVD INGLEWOOD, CA 90301 1076-341-35 JOHN & COLETTE BONTEMPO 10556 RING AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-341-38 ROMMEL S & SIGNA JIMENEA PO BOX 3946 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729 1076-341-41 BARRY D & SHIRLEY PITTS 10616 RING AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-341-44 VIVIAN M REVC 10646 RING AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-341-4~ ~sNk= _MOOA~ 660D VALINDA AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-341-51 KEVIN REYNOLDS 6595 VALINDA AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 1076-341-54 ALEJA CASTELLON 10660 HEATHER ST ALTA LOMA, CA 91737 Laser 5960'"" Smootn reea aneeis ~ m 1076-341-57 CARL & STEPHANIE RUSSELL 10659 MANGO CT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 Y7//\`l AVFRV~ Address Labels *** 61 Printed *** ..,........r......._. ,___ Laser 5960'M `~~T a1uf B/C 4 Y ~~ ~~ 3~ First American Title Company 323 West Court Street • San Bernardino, California 92412.909.889 0311 • fax 909.384 8440 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ss COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, MARC A. AVILA, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ACCORDING TO THE RECORDS OF A VENDOR SERVICE, THE ATTACHED LIST CONTAINS THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PERSONS TO WHOM ALL PROPERTY IS ASSESSED AS THEY APPEAR ON THE LATEST AVAILABLE ASSESSMENT ROLL OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO WITHIN THE AREA DESCRIBED AND FOR A DISTANCE OF 300 FEET FROM THE EXTERIOR BOUNDARIES OF THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS: ASSESSORS PARCEL # 1076-341-01 I/WE CERTIFY (OR DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF U HE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA) THAT THE F REGO CORRECT. DATE: September 18, 2003 SIGNED SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME ON THIS 18th DAY OF, SEPTEMBER 2003.- ~ GEORGENA MUNIZ r ~}^~ COMM.M13t15635 Z m, - " NOTARY PUBLIC-CALJFORNIA 3 Z _ SqN gERNARDINO COUNTY ~ ,My Commisslon E~ires May 25. 2005 November 4, 2005 Dan Coleman Acting City Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Dear Mr Coleman, .. T ,// II ....,, ~~~.z,;~ ~I~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JAN 2 4 2006 RlDCCIVED -PLANNING 1 am venting this letter to inform you of some of the issues that my husband, I, and our neighbors have had to deal with regarding the Aim-All Storage Fac~hty protect on Haven Ave and the 210 Freeway Our first notification that something was being planned for that lot was the day before the City Council meeting to amend the zoning code for that site We did not receive notification from the City, Planning Dept , or proposed developer, but instead from a neighbor who lust happened to see a nonce about tt As 1 was unable to attend that meeting, I wrote a letter stating my concern about the proposed amendment and protect which was entered into the record by my neighbor At the Council meeting, my neighbors who were able to attend were told they could only speak about the zoning code amendment m general and not about the proposed storage fac~hty specifically As there were no other City Council meetings regarding this issue, we were never given the chance to voice our opinions, concerns, & opposition to this protect specifically to the City Council Already our hands were being tied Next was the letter from Charles Joseph Associates (Charles Buquet), m representatwn of the developer, stating that their studies deemed that property unfit for residential use due to the excessive nose levels from the freeway The best solution was a storage facility Not only was I appalled at this statement, but I felt cheated by the Gty and Cal-Trans because we were never offered any type of relief from the freeway noise (m fact, only 3 homes on our street were offered anyt}ung) This is where, 1 feel, the ties from the developer began, as there are numerous new neighborhoods going up along the 210 and 15 freeways The letter also informed us of the Planning Commission meeting regarding this development I knew m my heaR that this wastust a formahty as I have never seen the Planning Commission nor City Council vote down any protect that Charles Buquet has presented (yes, I know his connections run deep and wide m the city of Rancho Cucamonga) At the meeting, I feel that my neighbors and 1 were completely ignored By this I mean that as we spoke, one commissioner swiveled his chau from side to side, never once looking at the speakers, one shuffled through papers, one tapped a pen on a stack of papers while looking at the ceiling, and, worst of all, one was on a cell phone Tell me you wouldn't feel tike you were being ignored and that then minds had already been made up with that kind of body languages I ended up making a fool out of myself because I was so angry about the aloof behavior of these non-elected commissioners We brought up all the same issues that the most recent storage facility-threatened ~f ~~ E ~~a s~/~'~ neighborhood voiced and more as this one islust 2 %z feet away from our property lines not 200 feet Only one comm~ss~oner (Christine MacPhail, 1 believe, but I'm not sure) voiced concern about this protect being allowed m awell-established res~dent~al neighborhood She stated that the Planning Commission, City Council, and Planning Dept should and would keep close tabs on this protect as rt was setting a precedent m this city She also said that the developer should have frequent meetings with our neighborhood not only to keep us updated on the protect, but to allow us to have a say in how rt should look in order to better fit m wrth our well-established neighborhood As you probably know by now, NONE of that happened At the one and only meeting (1 don't Gaze what the Aim-All people say, we were only notified of this one meetmg~ Obviously, had we known of any others we would have been there) with the developer and city representatwes, we were repeatedly told what a great thing this would be for our neighborhood and how lucky we were that the developer wasn't putting m afast-food restaurant or convenience store Actually, the code amendment wouldn't allow for that, so they weren't really dorng us a favor When one person asked the developer what they would've done ~f the zoning code had not been amended, the response was that they would not have bought the property if they had not been assured that the code amendment would pass (tell me that doesn't appear to reek of backroom dealings)! Promised/ Actuality/ Possible Solutions Promised We were told that the building would be 18 inches (north end) to 3 feet (south end) above our ex~stina ag rden walls They told us that we would be amazed at how much dirt would be removed in order to accomplish that Actuality The building ~s below garden wall level at the north end and 2-3 feet above the approximately 5 feet of unremforced block (again, I don't caze what Aim-All says, there was no rebar when they illegally added those courses of block) that was added to my neighbor's wall What happened to 3 feet above our existme walk It probably has something to do with a conversation between some people on the construction site that one of my neighbors overheazd It was about how the person who was taking the dirt wasn't going to take it anymore because rt wasn't clean as promised The figgmg stopped after that and they started leveling out the dirt I knew then that they would not keep this promise Possible Solution Make them tear it down and do rt right or, better yet, tear rt down period Probably won't happen though, nght~ Promised The building will not only fit m with the neighborhood, rt will reduce the noise from the freeway Actuality Although I have nothing against mobile homes, I don't happen to Lve m one So I don't see how a corrugated aluminum roof fits m with my neighborhood Not only is it ugly, but the glaze when the sun hits it is blmding~ I can't open my upstairs blinds m the afternoon it's so bad V/hen rt rams, rt's extremely loud Even a fight ram sounds like a torrential downpour The way the building ~s situated seems to be funneling the freeway Z noise right into our homes and the aluminum roofs seem to be amplifying rt Pm sure you're thinking that, according to the Laws of Physics, it's not possible WeII, m my house, it's a reahty~ 1 can't open my upstairs windows during peak traffic hours or at night Heck, it's loud even with the windows closed It was not this bad before the fac~hty was built Possible Solution Coat the roofs with some kind of substance that cuts down the glare and makes the aluminum less noise conducive I don't know ~f a poly-urethane (~) type material would work, but I'm sure that there's something that will and I'm sure you will find ~t Or, tear the roofs off and put composite ones on Now that would fit m with our neighborhood The developer could always pay for us to have tinted dual-paned windows m the rooms of our homes that are affected By the way, we did bring these issues up at the Planning Commission & Developer meetings They were laughed off (yes, laughed off) by the developer and the City of R C 's representatives (not the Commissioners) We were told they were "non-issues" and not to worry about them Promised The building would not have the hideous color scheme that was shown ~n their presentation Definitely the homble salmon pink would not be a part of rt Actuality The building has the hideous color scheme that was shown m their presentation The horrible salmon pink ~s definitely a part of it Possible Solutiou Paint rt with something more suitable that doesn't involve salmon pmk~ Forme, this isn't a mayor issue It's~ust one more broken promise I think rt helps to show a pattern of behavior Promised My husband asked what the elevations of the buildings would be and ~f he could see the plans He was told, as were the rest of us, that the plans had not yet been finalized and they didn't have the plans with them (how convement~) However, when they were finalized, we would be notified of another meeting where we could look over, submit suggestions, and "sign off' on the plans There would be other meetings, too, before construction would begin Actuality BIG, GIANT LIES~~~ We NEVER received notice of any other meeting One neighbor called the developer several times over several weeks only to be told that the plans were still not finalized and then they began grading In fact, my husband and his friend went to the Planning Dept several months ago to see the plans (he figured they probably had been finalized by then since the building was already up & running) He told the woman behind the counter that he wanted to see all the plans for the Aim-All Storage Facility on Haven Ave & the 210 freeway She said she needed the exact address He said it was between 6500 and 6600 Haven Ave She said she didn't have time to look up all the addresses m that block (they were the only people at the counter) He informed her that there's only one building on Haven that would be m that address range She told him that without the exact address she couldn't help him and walked away This, to me, eprtom~zes the total lack of respect and concern [hat the Planning Dept has for the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga If she really wanted to help him she could've grabbed a phone book and looked up the address or given my husband the book so he could do ~t himself It would be really sad ~f the Planning Dept did not have the technology to look up a project by name and/or general address (he was close enough - 6599 Haven Ave - .~~~ :ti ~ , ~„ 1 1 1 1 a 1 . ~~ r~,rf / ~ ~ . • ~ ' .1 ' ~ , 1 ~ ,[ • ~ n q i i ., ~ / ~ .. ~ • ' / i~, d~u ' [ ~ • / r 1 Fi y . ' 1' ~, ' [ 'IAA , •~1 . f . , [~ ~ r t {`. ~ ~ •~ ~ ,N 1 ~ , 1• 1. ` ~ [ 1111• ~I ' ~ 111 l r ' J ~I • .11_ ~~ / 1, 111 [ t i~ 1r i r t that rt should've taken less than 30 seconds) It really seemed to me that she didn't want him to see the plans for some reason Why all the secrecy if everything's on the up & ups Possible Solution For me, ttus bell cannot be unrung~ It will be a very long time before I trust any developer or anyone from the Gty of R C 's Planning Dept, if even That being said, perhaps zoning codes should not be amended until the developers have actual plans that the city and residents can examine Promised Sound wall at the northeast end of the site that would not only help reduce the freeway noise, but would keep unauthonzed mdrnduals out of the storage facility and, ultimately out of our neighborhood. I took that to mean that people would not be able to access our neighborhood or properties via the storage facility property Actuality A wall that steps down to height of approximately 2-3 feet A wall that anyone can step over In fact, people have stepped over that wall, climbed the slope, stepped onto the roof of the amts adJacent to our back walls, and walked the length of those units I assume they exited through the emergency vehicle gate at the south end of the property, but 1 can't say for sure However, it would have been so easy for them to Just s~ over my back wall into my yazd as there is a 3 ft surchazge of dirt (& now concrete) up against my garden wall How daze this developer be allowed to put my family and our property m this kind of Jeopardy ~ ~ This is absolutely mexcusable~ Solution I understand that this issue is m the process of being remedied If not, and rt's an issue with Cal-Trans, then the City & developer need to get together with Cal-Trans and do whatever it takes to work this out Cost should not be an issues This should have been done BEFORE any construction was allowed to begin as ti ~s a MAJOR SAFETY ISSUE for our neighborhood Actual Construction When the actual grading began, the crews did a pretty good Job of dust control A water truck was constantly going azound the site to keep the dirt from blowing azound However, after a couple of weeks the truck was there far less often until it was completely gone from the site The problem with that was the Job was still "m the dirt" as no footings had even been dug let alone poured Our homes were getting sandblasted Pools, spas, and houses had a constant layer of dirt (and still do to a lesser degree because of the homes that are being built at the far southern end of the site) There were no fences azound the construction site, so krds and others were constantly on the site When fences were finally put up, they were flimsy and constantly blowing over They, however, did not bother to put up any fencing at the northwest end of the site neaz the freeway on- ramp So much for safetya When it tamed, there were avers of muddy water m the neighborhood from the site The construction crews consistently started work before 7 00 a m (usually between 6 OS and 6 40 a m) I was constantly being cussed out by the masonry foreman for asking them not to start before 7 00 a m In fact, at one point, a gentleman (I don't know ~f he was with the city or the developer) had to step m and push the foreman away from my face The workers would play their radios at a volume that would rattle my windows 4 (even if tt had been a station I liked, the decibel levels were beyond unacceptable) My husband kept telling me to call the police At the rime I felt the police had better things to do as our daughter had recently lost four fnends to violent deaths m this city Not only that, but what happen? The developer would be fined? Big deal ~ 1 was, and still am, fed up with this city profiting at my expenses Now, however, I wish I had called the police every time I so much as heard them sneeze back there before 7 00 a m ~ Then I would have indisputable proof oflust how disrespectful this developer and their workers have been One of the worst offenses occurred on Pnday, January 2 i, 2005 at approximately 11 30 a m The construcrion crew was working on the emergency vehicle lane behind my property I had noticed that the workers kept going m the azea between the facility budding and my and my neighbor's back wall I thought it was odd because I didn't know of any work going on back there (not that I claim to know where there were supposed to be working) At the parttculaz time menrioned above, I was looking out my kitchen window I saw one of the workers walking towazd my back wall unbuttoning his pants He looked side to side, and at some point, must have seen me m the kitchen window m front of him He ducked between the facility wall and my neighbor's wall He came out 20-30 seconds later zipping up tits pants I knew then that they were using that azea as a toilet (& trash can) I called Mtke Tormey, the construction supervisor for Aim-All, to tell him what I had lust witnessed When 1 told him who I was, tits response was, "Aw, what nowt" I told him what 1 had seen and he ey lled at me that tt wasn't possible because he had portables on the site I told him that 1 knew that, I could see them on the other side of the site from my bedroom window ]also informed him that the reason I could see the worker unbuttonrng &ztppmg up tits pants was because they had put a 3 ft surcharge of dirt up against my garden wall I told him that I could see people fromlust above the knee up Not only that, but when rt rains (& R was dnzzhng at that point) the water comes through my wall (because of the surcharge) and I had pictures to prove tU I, also, let him know what a major health hazard this was At that point he said, "Aw, shrt~ I'll take caze of rt " He did go and yell at tits workers within a couple of minutes of our conversation Although I appreciated Mike's effort, I did not appreciate the fact that a tamed hard later that day and the water (& Heaven knows what else) came through my wall They have since put concrete back there to try to stop the flow through the wall, but I have noticed tt come through at least once since I believe my issues with my neighbor's ] 0-12 ft gazden wall aze well documented with the city However, l feel that the fact that the developer did not have a permit for tie wall before tt was built should be on the record To me, that shows not only a lack of r~'spect for our neighborhood, but the city as well They have pushed the envelope every st@p of the way and the city lets them get away with rt They do rt first, then ask permission later and the city gives rt~ JUST STOPS How many homeowners would be allowed to get a pegpit after the fact for a wall that m no way meets budding code standards, with no plans, and no inspections during the building of that walk I'm sure the homeowner would have to tear tt down and start over Could this be a double standards When the developer had some workers apply plaster to my neighbor's side of that wall, they stepped onto my back wall (again, that darn surcharge) and then over into my neighbor's backyard When I asked them tf they had permission to be over there, they said they did I told them that was fine, but they did not have peimission to go across my property m that manner Unfortunately, I had to leave For a little while When 1 returned home, I saw one of the workers standing on top of my back wall swinging a 5 gallon bucket of plaster at my dog's head! Needless to say, that man learned a few new phrases that days A few days later, I spoke with my neighbor about whether or not he had given permission for those workers to be m his yard He said that not only had he not given permission, but those workers had trampled and gotten plaster on his expensive landscaping If my neighbor didn't give his permission and I certainly did not give my permission for my property to be used as access to my neighbor's, who do you suppose gave those workers that kind of unauthorized pennission~ Once again, a total lack of respect and regard for us and our properttesi Do you see the pattern of behavior here As far as my issues with the severely sloping retatmng walls behind my properly go, I know those are, also, well-documented I would, however, like to tell you about how 1 found out that wall was going to be built There had been a lot of digging going on behind my wall, so when I saw Mtke Tormey standing back there I asked him what they were planning on doing He told me they were going to pit up a retammg wall I naively, and mistakenly, thought he meant that they were going to take out our (my neighbor to the south, my ,and my neighbor to the north's) ewstmg back walls and put up the retammg wall I said that was good and mentioned that I didn't understand how they had gotten away with the 3 ft surcharge of dirt up against our garden walls (essentrally using them as retammg walls) for so long He laughed and stated that he was surprised that those walls were holding up as well as they were I was a bit stunned by this admission, but, since rt was one of the friendlier conversations I had had with Mike, I didn't want to rum it with an "Ahai" My mtstakei 1 told my husband about the conversation and the retatmng wall when he got home from work that day We were both optimistic that finally, finally they were going to do something right by usi Imagine our surprise and disappointment when the wall went up behind our back wall Not only does the retaining wall have a severe slope to it (that causes instant vertigo when one steps into our backyard), they left a 3 ft gap between the retammg and our neighbor's wall What they did, essentially, was create a funnel into our backyard for anyone walking behind that building Since they made rt so one can literally step over our back wall into our yard, I'm sure that you can understand our anger and outrage that this was not only allowed to happen, but had to have been approved by someone m the Planning Dept Also, the 1 inch gap between the retaining wall and our bank wall that traps the ram Since the sun doesn't hit that area, the block stays damp for days and has caused lime to leech through Thts is m the process of being remedied, but I'll get to my feelings on that shortly Current Issues Issue Very bright light, on the far eastern side of the south building, that shores through two of our upstairs bedroom windows all night In fact, the whole facility is so Irt up at night that it's almost hke daylight ~P Solution Use a motion-sensitive type light, place the light lower on the wall, or use lower wattage lights I prefer the motion-sensrtwe light solurion because then maybe, Just maybe, I would be able to see a star or two at night from my bedroom window again Issue Loud automated sprinkler system that goes on at least four times a day, including l 1 30 at night 1t makes a hissing (I'm sorry, I don't know how to better describe rt One would have to hear rt to believe rt) noise that is so loud when it goes on, rt literally makes one Jump Not to mention how frightening that noise is at mght~ Solution I believe, but I'm not sure, that the only landscaping on the site happens to be right behind our property and the sprinkler system control unit is wrtlun approximately 15 feet of our property line I'm sure that's why we hear it so clearly I don't know what, if anything can be done about the nose, but we would appreciate it if they would stop the 11 30 p m watering Issue The startlingly loud metal roll-up doors on the storage amts, especially the amts that have therr back walls within 2 %: feet of our properties Solutiou There really isn't anything that can be done about this, is there It ~s unbelievable to me that no one connected with the city (City Council, Planning Commission, & Planning Dept) did any studies on this before they decided to put this kind of business m a residential neighborhood I would hope that the City would not rely on the word of Charles Joseph, Associates and/or the developer for this kind of information I would rather hear the freeway Oh wart. I still dog ~ ~ Issue A couple of months ago we recewed an mv~tarion to attend the Aim-All Storage grand opening The hours of operation were stated on the front of the postcard We already knew that they would be open from 7 a m to 7 p m 7 days a week, 52 weeks a year, but we were mortified to learn that they would be open 24 hours a day for commercial accounts Solution JUST SAY NOS ~ ~ This is yet another example of how this developer does things first and asks for permission later There is no way that any business operating m a residential neighborhood should be allowed to be open 24 hours a days Especially when the neighborhood has been there for 26 years before the business Those metal doors don't know what time ~[ ~s they're always loud In fact, on Wednesday, September 21, 2005 at 9-50 p m , we endured such an episode We heard a loud, crashing metallic bang We looked out at the storage facility and, sure enough, there was a truck (Oman's Store Fixtures & Lrquidators, Inc) at one of the amts close to our home Until 10 25 p m , we heard crashing, banging, yelling, and honking Finally, the truck rumbled away So, l beg you, please, please, please don't allow them to operate this kind of business m our neighborhood 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 52 weeks a year Please don't even allow them any leeway on the 7 p m closing rime If a customer comes at 2 minutes (or even-29~ minutes) to 7 and they can't unload everything before 7 p m ,they should be told to come back the next day They're open 7 days a week, for goodness sake ~ DO NOT give m to them on this issue PLEASE!!! Dealing with the City .. ~, - , ,. , „ •„ . ,,,. F ~ ry,,~ . , ,. ;~ ,; I ~ , „ , , ., _ , ,, ~., , ~ , .,.,~ ~ , ,. ;,r. , ,' ~ ~ , ,- ,~ .'" ' ~ ~ ,~~ .,,s ,~,, ~ ~~ . ,_. ~ ,, ~ '_-t' li ,I' ~ ~n ~ Ii ~ ~, .r ~ ~~ ,~ , "~ .i! .~.,~ ~f a n, , , i. _~ i~ .r ~ i. ~ ~ ~ , i , t , ~ , e ~ . ~ . •~ .~lt+.,• , .'( ' .'rl li „ ~ ~ . I , ,It .~rl ~~, ~; i ll I' i rv ~~ ~ P, is ~. . ' ~ In July, I contacted Councilman Rex Gutierrez by e-mail because I took exception with something he said at a Council meeting about my neighborhood and our lack of fighting to keep this storage facility out of rt I mentioned some of the issues that I've stated m this letter I'm not sure if he contacted the Planning Dept ,but an Inspector Supervisor for the city showed up at my door mqu~rmg about my neighbor's wall I actually felt a bit sorry for her because I knew she was being put m the middle of a rock and two hazd places She had the developer on one side, a neighborhood that had had basically no contact with the Planning Dept since that one meeting with the developer (& desperately needed to vent our fnrstrarions), and somewhere in the middle, the actual building codes I would not have wanted to trade places with her, that's for sure However, my empathy soon began to wane when it became clear that she was going to protect and defend the developer's best interests I'm not saying that our (the neighborhood's) best interests should've come first, I'm saying that what was right according to the building codes should've taken precedence On several occasions she told me that she drdn't know what my problem was with the retaining wall behind my wall (as did Mike Tormey) and that I couldn't possibly know [hat there was no rebar (I should say structural rebaz they could've dropped some in after the fact) in my neighbor's wall (even though I had watched ~t go up block by block from the uncapping to the recapping) It took 2 City Councilmen and her own boss to convince her that there was a problem wtth the walls A BIG problems As faz as my neighbor's wall goes, Mike Tormey had assured the inspector that there was rebar m that wall (I'm sure there ~s m the lower half) and that he would even have it xrayed (this after he had admitted that tt had been put up without perm~ss~on, plans, engineering, & inspection) Later, when she told me that the xray showed there was rebar m the wall, I told her that I would like to see the xray because I knew that they had not done any drilling 1 was met with a cold stare and dead silence Then, she told me that the developer had alwavs been upfront and honest with her and had been cooperative ~n every way (please reread this paragraph thus far Honest & upfront Hahn) She, then, insinuated that perhaps my neighbors and I were the problem not the developer I have since noticed that my neighbor's is braced to the storage facility unit wall At one point, the inspector told me that my neighbor was "very happy" with Ins wall (he later confronted her about that statement) and my neighbor up the street was "happy" that the two tall towers had been painted (they were bright white with lights on them at night At the lime they repainted them white They have since been painted a shade of brown) She had appazently told them that I was "happy" with the options for my wall It wasn't until we all talked that we found out how "happy" we were It was news to us because not one of us was "happy" This kind of behavior goes back to that one meeting with the developer Apparently, the City representative told the Planning Dept and City Council that our neighborhood was "very happy" with everything the devtoper har}said Once again, a LIEr One of my neighbors was so "very happy" that he put lus house up for sale wrthm a week of that meeting None of us were "happy" after that meeting, but a few of us were cautiously opt~m~sttc that the developer would actually do what they had S 1 ~- y, ., „ i 1,1 I ' ,, . , ~ I, 1 ' ~ ''~ .,-, , ,~~ iu ,. • ~ ~ 1' ...,~ ~ ~ ~,,,,, ., l ,i ~:. ,. '. 1 , ' ' ~ , ~ , ' S v- `i~ 1 tl i t ~ 1 , 1.~' ti fl ~ ~ ~ I rd d I ! w ~ ~ 1/ ~ ~ ~ , l ~, i I rfdJ' - ,P, ,1 f., ' f , i i ' ~ <.J ~ , ., d. 1'' ' r I , . ,,- 1 , 5, , ~. it 1 ,~ . 'i , ~ - t, ~ 1.1 1 ~,1 i. fI . t'~' 1 promised and that the Cary would keep close tabs on them to make sure they did That obviously didn't happen I feel that the City dropped the ball every step of the way on this protect A prolect that should've been monitored daily as rt set a zoning code precedent m this city Had it been, I'm sure there wouldn't be the problems with which we are now dealing I see now that the inspector was not so much as siding with the developer as she was protecting (or covenng for) the city given what seems to be their apparent lack of supervision for this protect Once again, I would not want to be m her position Property Values I have recently spoken with several realtors, all of whom told me that because of the "incurable obsolescence" that was built behind our homes, we could expect a 10% - 20% decrease m the market value of our homes depending on the market Another mator issue that was brought up at every opportunity and was dismissed as another non-issue by the City Council, Planning Commission, Planning Dept ,Developer, and Charles Joseph, Associates (Chazles Buquet) Why should any of these people care about our property values, it wasn't m their backyard, nght~ Hopefully, one day rt will bey I feel that the all those mentioned above should be held accountable for the decrease m the value of our homes We did not want this storage facility m our neighborhood and certainly not within 2 %z feet of our properties They're the ones who pushed rt through (seemingly without thought) so I feel they should be held financially liable for our losses I also feel that those same people owe everyone m~ y neighborhood an explanation as to how & why this could've happened It wouldsriice if all of us could have an informal, yet recorded, meeting where our neighborhood could finally get some honest, straight-forwazd answers to our questions Wouldn't you agree we deserve at least that much Our Wall We were given a couple of different options for our wall None of which I felt was the best and proper option I suggested that the developer tear down the existing back garden walls of three homes at the southeastern end of the site (my neighbor to the south, mine & my neighbor to the north) and put one step-down retaining wall there (they would have to take down the retaining wall that is now there) I think this would have been the best solution as 1 feel there is still a lot of pressure on my and my neighbor to the north's wall because of the 3 fr surcharge against them I have been told, but don't believe, that tfiere is a 9 fr caisson at the southeast comer of facility 1 know there's one at the northeast corner because I could hear and see them dnlling and placing it, but didn't see that down at my end I would tike some proof, and I don't mean an inspector's or engineer's signature or stamp on the plans I would tike to see pictures or xrays of that I was told that the city would never ask the developer to do that because of the cost involved (it always comes down to the almighty dollar, doesn't its) I, also, felt preesured to make a decision because, "the developer wants his $9 million retention back "Well, guess what I WANT MY QUALITY OF LIFE BACK!!! I want to see the sunset be}und the I mountains from my kitchen window, but can't because the bu~ldmg was allowed to be built 3 feet above where my property s~ts~ I want to see the stars at night from my bedroom window, but can't because that fac~hty is so ht up at night rt might as well be days 1 want to sleep with my windows open m the summer, but can't because of the freeway nose that is funneled through and amplified by that facility Heck, even with the windows closed it's hard to sleepy I want to not live feaz everyday that something m that facility is going to explode So, as far as their retention goes, I feel the city should hold it until this developer does right by this neighborhood. And I mean right by everyone m this neighborhood, not lust those who complain. If they don't, then the City should use that money to make sure it's done The inspector told me that we should be hearing from the developer soon as to the plans for our wall We'll see how that goes In conclusion, I would Lke to apologze for the length and often, shall we say, "passionate" tone of this letter However, I felt rt was important for you to know how we've been treated by everyone involved m this project from the very beginning 1 believe that relevant past behavior ~s a pretty good indicator of future behavior Based on that, I feel this city should think long and hard before ever allowing this developer to do business here agam~ 1 would also hke to sincerely thank you for taking the time to Lsten to us and for showing genwne concern regarding this subject That is something that we previously didn't have From your department, so rt ~s greatly appreciated Sincerely, /"~-C1.~262~ ~i2.~ / Tnna Stone 6610 Valtnda Ave Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 PS 1/23/06 As you can see, this letter was ong~nally written in November 2005 and for various reasons, 1 never sent tt m I'd hke to give you a Lttle update, though My wall has since been completed, and I have to say, that I'm d~sappomted, but not the least bit surprised, that not one person From the City Council or Planning Dept has contacted us to see ~f were satisfied I'm sure that somebody told someone that we're "happy " Surpnse~ I'm note My husband ~s resigned to the Fact that nothing will be done about rt, but I'm not grvmg m without a fight We chose not to have the developer paint or plaster that wall (before it was completed) because we thought it would look out of place as our two side walls aren't plastered or painted We understood that the block would not match exactly, but we felt it was pretty close The problem, however, is the dark brown grout (our existing grout ~s light gray), the sloppy grout lines (they're a mess), and the grout splatter on the blocks I told the inspector (when this was still m the planning stages) that I wanted to reserve the right to make them tear it down and do rt right if a wasn't ~0 satisfactory She told me I that I couldn't do that Apparently they knew that there would be no recourse fgr l~iett shoddy workmanship Not only that, but the wall stops at my neighbor to soutft's Wall (apparent]y they didn't complain), so the sloping retaining wall ~s still m our ]me of sight (c~ will be more so when we cut down the tree at the southwest end of our yard) This ~s~ust ndiculous~ 1 would hke to go on record as wantrng to see Aim-All's condmonal use permit revoked (or at least suspended) for all the reasons stated m the letter and because I feel that storage facilities m general should be classified as mdusinal businesses, due to what can be & ofren is stored within them, and ,therefore, should NEVER be m a residential netghborhood Thank you again for your time Deaz City of Rancho Cucamonga, I live on the 6600 block of Valmda Ave, Rancho Cucamonga CA and my back yazd borders the Aim All Storage facility that was granted a conditional use permit m the place of single family housing Since the storage unit has been constructed I feel the following problems have not been addressed properly and would like the Crty the help me as a resident get these things solve satisfactorily Problem The night lime lights causing excesswe lighting in our single family neighborhood The glow from Aim All Storage at night ~s more consistent with a shopping center parking lot than a single family neighborhood If there were homes behind us we would not have industnal glare all night long Solutions lower wattage lights Infrared cameras and motion censored lights Problem glaze from the corrugated steel roofing, we asked before construction started about the roofs and were assured they would not be a problem Anyone who has been to our homes will tell you these roofs have caused undo glare into our bedrooms and kitchen and ]rvmg areas Soluttons 1) Paint roofs and insulate 2) .Aim All to have affected houses installed with tinted windows Problem Noise on corrugated steel roofing during rain Again this goes back to our concern expressed during the planning stages Solution Insulate roofs Problem Sound wall on North East end of property has not been completed and allows a tunnel of noise through We were assured when this protect was approved that our sound quality would be improved because the gap along the 210/Haven on ramp would be closed off, Iommg the current Cal Trans sound wall This has not happened Solution Complete the sound wall matching the existing Cal Trans sound wall Thank you, ~jr~2--~ Ft,a~.,C-ic~A 6~~~ ~~~..r~n~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ter-, ~~ ~ o r-r- ~~ ~ ~-< ~~~7 n-~~ ~~.2t7a-T~N~ ~or-te-ictr~l~ ~ a a ~ la-gJ~ i i u-t S - i~k~-,~ k-~ • . t mac, v ~-~^~ h~~Sk t~G 1</ Dear City of Rancho Cucamonga, I true on the 6600 block of Valinda Ave, Rancho Cucamonga CA and my back yard borders the Arm All Storage facrlrty that was granted a condrt~onal use permit rn the place of single family housing Since the storage unit has been constructed I feel the following problems have not been addressed properly and would lrke the Crty the help me as a resident get these things solve satisfactonly Problem The night time fights causing excessive hghung m our single family neighborhood The glow from Arm All Storage at night rs more consistent with a shopping center parking lot than a single family neighborhood Li there were homes behind us we would not have industrial glare all night long Solutions lower wattage lights Infrared cameras and motion censored lights Problem glare from the corrugated steel roofing, we asked before construction started about the roofs and were assured they would not be a problem Anyone who has been to our homes will tell you these roofs have caused undo glare into our bedrooms and kitchen and Irving areas Solutions 1) Paznt roofs and insulate 2) Arm All to have affected houses installed with tinted windows Problem Noise on corrugated steel roofing dunng razn Again this goes back to our concern expressed during the planning stages Solutron Insulate roofs Problem Sound wall on North East end of property has not been completed and allows a tunnel of Horse through We were assured when this protect was approved that our sound quality would be improved because the gap along the 210/Haven on ramp would be closed off, Iorning the current Cal Trans sound wall This has not happened Solutron Complete the sound wall matching the existing Cal Trans sound wall Thank you, `off ~ ~~- ~~~~~, goy- ~~o -~~~~.~ Steve & June Selos 6542 Valinda Avenue Alta Loma 91737 Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission Re: Aim All Storage Unit 25 January 2006 We live on the 6600 block of Valinda Avenue and our back garden borders the Aim All storage facitility which was granted a conditional use permit in the place of single family housing. Since the storage unit has been constructed, a number of problems which have been brought to the attention of the City, continue to cause us concern. The problem that most concerns us is the way the wall on the north east end of the property has not been completed. I am referring to the wall on the units property. There is a staggered gap where the corner walls connect. Not only does this cause an issue with noise, but our biggest concern is the issue of security. We feel our concerns are justified as in October 2005 my immediate neighbors at 6538 Valinda was burglarized.. (I would add that my neighbours have lived here tis~ for 24 years without incident}The police investigating the crime informed us of their opinion that the perpetrators must have come through the gap in the wall The only solution to this would be to complete the wall allowing no gaps or easy access to all the properties in the neighborhood. Also, the sound wall on the north east end of the property has not been completed and allows a tunnel of noise through. We were assured when this project was approved that our sound quality would be improved because the gap along the 210/Haven on ramp would be closed off and join the current Cal Trans sound wall. This has not happened. The solution to this would be to complete the sound wall to match the existing Cal Trans sound wall. We appreciate the opportunity to bring these concerns to our City. Sinc~ly~\~ p Steve & June Selos Planning Commission Meeting of ~CAa1,1,t,G, ~~ a~0(p RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN-UP SHEET Please print your name, address, and city and indicate the item you have spoken regarding Thank you. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 ADDRESS CITY ~ c~ ~~ P~ ~a2 I .,via ~~,,Q >~ 6 3 io ~I~~P~ ~. e8~~ ~~~~i ~~9'~t I-1 a~ ~ v~ I"c65o ~r~DA ~tv~ (~5Oo ~ o..C; r-~~ +1-~e. ~lil/ ~G ~W~C ~~o~ vas, N~.~ s z ~~ ~ -~. ITEM Y~~ao~(.. `~ldl~. ~C 4?.3q ~~~ ~f-~~~- ~ (~ lu~/.{r//J~ ~~C- ~C,G, 2~- >~ .c. R _C . ~•~ G~ ~'~> K~'t~.crbtho .~ ~ 1S FOR 71iE PURPOSc' Pc r . P OF AD VALOREM iAXAilON ONLY a r C C I Map No . 7237 • P. M. 74/87. $$ NOr i0 SURVEYORS SCALE. OF SAN eF4 FlRST AMERICAN TTTLE INSURANCE COMPANY ~ ~~m4cf~~ i •?his map may or may not be a survey of the land de• Z ;_ ~ ~ ~ gleled hereon. You should nol rey upon M for arty pur. ~y~~ ~ = pose other than orkntation to tha general location of the `~ '7'iT~O parcel or parcels depicted. Flrst Amerkan Title e%GroeafJ fd5) dlsclalms airy (lability for alleged bss or damage whiott ~ ' +~ , ,.~, .. ;! •I Rancho Cucamonga Clty 1076 - ~; Tax Rate' Area 15000 maYJesu4~om retlaxe upon lMs ~.{ ~• I Is , - - - -~ - _ 1/Sp~1 99.91 - ~IW-IiT.- - ' ~ _- - - - - - - _. - - !1~ I15 ~' 25 ° ~ 'Y• J~ n i JO N 7 1~ ' n 1 113 ii.„f~ f ~` 51.11 ¢•8, ~~, 30 1 101.03 ° 115 ~ 4~ \ 1- • • ~ / P ~t ~ 23 ~ ~ 56 N v~ H ~• n ¢ e Ifi n.12 29.76 8 ~~'l'~ Par.3 tli ~ i r ~~; 4s' ttie.,e 120 1A Ils.ae ~ H.34 ~ t 20 21 58 ; ~.7 ~', 19 { „ ~, >. Q ~~ 3.06 AC. ~ 47 1 ~ .~ Q n W~ a ¢ 18 i,~ ~ ~ J 1 r .; o~ u i I 120.66 ~ .Zi m i IOS ~ ~~ i e It~~" ' 1 91.57 ~ s5.13 ~~ ~ - ~ 44.89 ~ .min e ~ .y to ~ a+ 49• ss7.OZ ~ I J~J zs zs ~• 6s 96 ~'( zz R J0.82 78.50 a I - / ~ 54.92 ~ ~, _ _ - _ -. -HEATFfR - 1 - f ~ x ------ 341- --I----- ~,a t ns -~-•------ 48.26 ' 63 N 44 I `~ ~ 85.,6 65.16 s3.,6 I 65 ,8 73 83.77 ~ ,4' N Q 64 45 48.24 ` ~ `gr 65.,6 N ,J.,9 63.73 63• 8 ~ z ~ - o .~._ ~ o ~~-.._ ~l «. _ 27 ''a. -a~ _ - _ _ .,, ~°' ~~ t4.2s yo.t~ 4i o - - o~.` --- --,~J__°_~)~m t_-~ ~--rN-O 32 ` 6s•3` 46 ,~ o ~ 9 ~ ~ a 722 - 23 - 24 - ~ = 26 °- 27 - 28 ~ 29 8 • 30 - 31n 1 t''~,,s sb . 45 G .66 g C- Irs ~ 85.,6 85.,8 ro' 65 I 70 8 85.30 65.,6 65.,8 63 ,6 68.27 70.31 70.73 .48 w \ : ~ ~ Y7/ ~ n I ~ 83.30 63.50 63.50 63.16 u 57.01 ~ ,7.78 22.93 35.36 3,.7723. it 44 m ~ ~ ~ ~ 34 3g o 43 w ~ -¢_- $ "' ,° --,~~ ~ 37 38 39 ^ 40 41 45 ~ ti ~ ~ IIS ~ + N ~ „ 37- _-' _40 N__~I =_42 `H= ~"r"~~'~ ~'•~ ~ Q .p J __ a-•J -~ - ~ m _ m ~ I '` 49 I I I _ T _N N_ N /j(~'~ tk I sz.51 ,.• .3 f c 85.50 ~ 65.50 I 65 50 I 65.50 65.16 ^' ,0.80 ~ 6 65 85 ~ - ~ / '/ ' 39 85•j9 . 02 ~ (n•\ n / 8S' ~- 108.82 Ji ~ ~ - - wz o -- -RING- -- --- ----------- ~ -------'-~ 6,.,0' N 'U•7s ~ ~ ~ ~ - i \ > ~ ~3~ ~- ss.s9 ~, X03 es ~ 210 n° w 85 ~•n ~ l bs. ri B 7 ,9. 24.08 65 85 I ~ V • 65.39 ~ u~ 04 2 N ' yl, o R rv H _n I 3`,42 JS 33 J/2 53 85.39 63.,0 u " O5 3 ~ tl s/ ~ ~ ~ n 17 ' ~ 06 4 t• e,.3o ~..J ~~ z H l i o7 5 tl ~/ ~•:A 16 15 I6 14 .18 ~41 ~3) ~ ' ~ ~ ~ Os 6 ~ n j~ 37.,6 13o 113 .i I2 ,~ II J, > ¢ .ti I~ g ~I0 g ICJ 7 7t S~R~ 1 85 65 83 '1 1`~ 71 65 50 2 57.5, 71 71 I / ---------1-9TH---- .-' u U r 0 ~~ ~~~~0 '1" ' ~ y~ b f107 I ri Q I. Q V C $ ~ ; ~ _~s I ~v.$v m V O~ D a N ~ A E v~ o W yq ~+ a, ~ 2 ~ > > d ` N A N=.roEaEl idm«a4~ R a g $ «i ~Wj C 4 r4 _u ~~ C c zEN~L° ~ ~ ~i 7 D G ua ~ E 2 ~ ~ = E ~ <na°~ a °I _¢„tssE~ I 4~n$u~'` I n ~ I I I I I I I N I p (V ~ ~ ry I i I i i I q i a I I CC i I , ~~ I i I I - ... 1 OC ~ pC 6C'ro // 89 lN1 }~ l ~ ~ ©~ N M __~ 'n N I ~• C1 P„ ..~~ 89 ~ R I- - -- - - ~ ~~1$-- - •- -- ~ 1 R ~, ~-- ._ - _~ 1 ~ ~ Oy,`C CY•011 CC•101 ' ~, rovoi ~ n.u (, 103 a I qb O ~ u~7nV- _.. _.. ._ _ -_ .- - -- -~ IN3AV - --b'aNI lb~- " - - -N3ANH _ ._ O ' I .. _. .- .- a w°~ h~ W ~ ' ~ ~ f ~ 1. r+ MM C MU° '~_ a u c ;° ~ ~ , Ih F7.. 't7 ~' (C ILD i O Q L ~, m^m y~ N --qqp C QmN , i• i') U 3 ~~ 3 ~ ., zZ ~^ n°_ ~ ~ ~ ,0 q L - CS ~ m v ~:;~ r ~ C 4 ' V l .G ~ .C Y C Q ~ ` ~ _ M ~ N T- Q ~ ~ VI ~ Z ~ : a ~ , % o r w « •- Y ~ ~ E m ._ ~ •° ~ ~ c r ~ ~ ~ w • ~ ~ ~ u ~ i o Z e M `I+ I ~ L ~ ~~ . . ~ A! .. ~_ '' f ~ ~ : )B91 i P MAY 1988 )o <. )0 70 7o 7p t/ 13 56 57 58 59 60 I I I i .~ 11 _ 12 13 14 _ 15 l03 11 30 !0 I 09 7 L 103 16 19 I 3o 101 67 J0 _ 1 01 67 1 to I 30 lo: so l01 sa 1 1 _ - _ - _ _ . ~ 1 l6 e I ° 26 10 ~ 17 z7 I O 28 "• 38 ° 21 ss I p 71 19 70 70 70 B 31 7 76 0 1 ~ ~' t0 16 I mot- ~l 101 67 1 I + 107 30 ° ^ ~ - - H{,FTfE i~ - 91.9 - 'L~ - - S•-F-I~E~i- - oe 6 - ~ ~ 18 is . `" ~ ° 25 9 ^ 8 26 ° ~u ~ ~ 37 27 0 s~ o µ' I 7p 33 31 :1 Bp 8 • 61 BI 61 61 ^ s5 IB I I 1 I 16 i I 102 67 102 67 I 101 30 707 30 w I o S7 ~' 20 ° 1~'6 I 07 5 n I 11 14 I 2< g 19 29 Q I '" 36 26 19 53 I i ~ _ 0 - 65 19 _ _ 64 18 _ _ 17 _ 63 16 I 1 1 103 16 '1 1~ '1 I tit I 107 67 tOt 67 . 9 134 -92 1 1 ° ~ \ 5 'l I I 69 99 9t 90 62 61 O 61 I D6 4 16 13 I o 23 ] I V 1 61 6~ 6t 73 BI 61 BI 70 61 76 )o of 70 I r 1 6q 6A 20 30 I 25 Js O t8 5i « ° 1 O I I 21 22 23 24 !0 25 ~ Y ~ 6 \ 1 ~ 101 67 107 67 I Io7 so l01 so I 66 _ 6) _ 68 69 ~ 70 ~° 05 3 r 4 15 t1 a ¢ ° 22 6 21 - 31 +--~ z ° 34 24 17 sl J+c I ~ l.- `96,13 ~ ° 1 ~ _ ~ 10! 71 I n IOJ lm s C ~ 101 67 102 67 ~ I 30 I ° t .~ 41 _ ~ a _ 30 J~3J~J 0~ J e` p7 ry !0 _ ` D4 2 I ° 14 tl ~ 30 I 30 S, 21 5 ^n ~, e p1 ~ ~ !D 1 !v - - J 61 69 q 3U 19 'Oe •~° J3 B77Q ' I ~~ B3 it BJ 13 /// ~ I ~~~'` 6t o, ~ ,. /' l ~ ~ ,G JO ~ •~ I I a ~ _ - ~ _ ^ I I 1 53 U /j 1 ~~ DI )1 / D3 16 J I _ - ti~ 75 0 ~ 3J y6 4 33 55 .o ~, 39 s13o B ° I - -- --- J °,_- - N Itill O E - - J tr tt. ^„ 30 ~ ~' 29 ., s a ~ 28 27 ,. 66 .e a 26 9B 37 ~1 I ~~ 33 / 33 I6 33 . 71 17 71 17 n n n n 71 17 71 17 y 7370 36 Q ~ n ~ _ ° 74 73 >" 72 - n e e 1 03 e I ~ o to 13 0 17 ~ 18 o t9 a 20 ~ 1 2 « 3 _° / fie s 4 - j ~ ~/5! 1) 71 97 70 01 7p 71 ° I 98 79 /i~~ I i ``'` - 1 e 2 ° 3 - °0 39 w 0° 4D o O II ° 42 I 71 i 3! IB 71 17 71 17 4 71 17 71 17 71 17 71 17 71 !3 B! 60 Z7 f1 ____ _ ~9T'N--- _ ~ I ~ ~ ~ - - ~ _ - - ~i Rf•E 1- - - - -- I I ~~~.: ytr •;1 ,.: ~'~ '~~'. t` .t ~' Pln iracl No. 15531, N B 166/91-95 Por irDC! No 9366, N B 135/10-21 Por irocl No 9429, N.B 132161-64 Por iracl No 9370, 11.6. 131/90-91 - 9 , I I 43 ~ h I , 96 I 15 l 1 Ptn. N.E. 1/4, Sec. 35 BookS1076 Page 14 T.1 N., R.7 yy• San Bernardino County I.~ RE VIfFO 05/11/88 PE 09/O6/9D NP 03/11/92 8L8 01/16/98 PE X833 - ~-~Ff-Gf1lyM~B- - - ~0 MAY 1988 . !. ~, , , -, ~~:r;,~'; '. . uLUI 15 '- -' --iri'-ENftE- - - - - - _ - ~~- _ STAiE HIGHWAY 30 Pln irocl No. 15531, Al. B.. 266/92-95 Por Trocl No 9429, N B 132/61-64 Por iracl No 9366, N B. 135/20-11 Por Traci No. 11932, N.B. 181/79,80 Por iracl No 9310, U.B. 131/90-91 I i I Assessor's Map Ptn. N.E. 1/4, Sec. 35 Book 1076 Page 13 T.1 N., R.7 W, San Bernardino County.._ r r.~0. eEViseo 05/11/88 PE 03/05/97 PE 01/16/98 PE 07/07/98 PE