The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2006/02/22 - Agenda Packet~~ • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION ~ AGENDA 7~~~~ CU~ ONGA FEBRUARY 22, 2006 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Stewart_ Vice Chairman Maaas Fletcher _ McNiel_ McPhad_ II. ANNOUNCEMENTS PRESENTATION OF A RESOLUTION COMMENDING COMMISSIONER LARRY MCNIEL FOR HIS SERVICE ON THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES January 25, 2006 Adiourned Meeting February 8, 2006 Regular Meeting IV. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendarrtems are expected to be rouhne and non-controversial They will be acted on by the Commission atone time without discussion If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00986 - MERITAGE HOMES AT RANCHO ETIWANDA LLC - A request to develop 145 homes on 52 54 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 du/ac) located on the north side of Day Creek Boulevard, east of the Southern California Edison Corndor APN 225-071-47, 51 and 225-081-08, 09, 14, and 15 Related file Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16227 Staff has found the project to be within the scope of the protect covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report (State Cleannghouse #88082915 and #98121091 certified by the City Council on August 1, 2001) and does not raise or create new PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA FEBRUARY 22, 2006 RANCHO CvcAMONCA 2 environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report V. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following dems are public heanngs in which concerned individuals may voce their opinion of the related pro/ect Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be I~mited to 5 minutes per individual for each project Please sign in after speaking B ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17745 - JASEN GROHS - A proposed subdrnsion to convert 60 existing residential apartment units to 60 residential condominiums on 5 72 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) located at 9866 through 9940 Highland Avenue -APN 0201-395-01 through -15 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration C PUBLIC SLOPING FOR SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) DRC2004-01204 FOR THE NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION, PRE ZONE (DRC 2004-01208), AND ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT (DRC2006-00041) -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An opportunity to give public testimony pertaining to the environmental issues to be addressed in a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to the General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report (State Cleanng House No 2000061027, certified October 17, 2001) for approximately 4,115 acres to be annexed into the City, the pre-zoning of approximately 685 acres to be in conformance with the City's Development Code and zoning regulations and an Etiwanda North Speafic Plan Amendment (ENSP) to amend approximately 508 acres within the ENSP area (110 68 acres rezoned from Flood Zone to Resource Conservation, 242 72 acres rezoned from Hillside Residential to Resource Conservation, and, 154 74 acres rezoned from Flood Control to Resource Conservation), located in the northern Etiwanda Area of unincorporated San Bernardino County, generally north of State Highway 210, and generally west of Haven Avenue to the eastern boundary of the City of Fontana in the City's Sphere-of-Influence -APN 0201-03-209, 250, 273, 278-279, 282-285, 0201-28-102, 104-110, 113-114, 116-122, 0225-05-101, 104, 107, 115, 117-120, 122-123, 125-134, 136-137, 0225- 06-102, 105-106, 108-111, 115-117, 121-122, 125-127, 129-130, 133, 0225-07-101-116, 120, 0225-09-105-06, 201, 0226-06-103, 107, 116, 120, 126-128, 133, 147-148, 156-157, 161-174, 0226-08-208, 0219-221, 230 f`J • • r~ L • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA FEBRUARY 22, 2006 co~ o cn 3 VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS This rs the hme and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda VII. COMMISSION BUSINESS VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m ad/ournment time If items go beyond that hme, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL ADJOURN TO A WORKSHOP IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING TO DISCUSS PRE- APPL/CATIONREVIEW- DRC2005-010351NTHE RAINS ROOM. I, Lois J Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the Cify of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on February 16, 2006, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 CIVIC Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at http•//www a rancho-cucamonaa.ca us If you need speaal assistance or accommodations to partiapate m this meeting, please contact the Planning Dmsion at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired Vicinity Map Planning Commission Meeting • February 22, 2006 N1 /S ~ Sphere1.shp • /~/ City Boundary (as of 12/20/2005) • ~, ~s i T H E C I T Y O F _ _ _ R~AzNC80 CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE February 22, 2006 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner BY Emily Cameron, Assouate Planner SUBJECT• DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00986 - MERITAGE HOMES AT RANCHO ETIWANDA LLC - A request to develop 145 homes on 52.54 acres of land rn the Low Residential Distnct (2~ dwellmg units per acre), located on the north side of Day Creek Boulevard, east of the Southern Calrfomra Edison Comdor APN 0225-071-47, 51 and 0225-081-08, 09, 14, and 15 Related file Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16227 Staff has found the project to be within the scope of the protect covered by a pnor Environmental Impact Report (State Cleannghouse #88082915 and #98121091 certified by the City CounGl on August 1, 2001) and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered m that Environmental Impact Report PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Protect Densrtv 2.1 dwellmg units per acre B Surroundino Land Use and Zornna North - Vagnt Land, North Etiwanda Preserve South - Single-Family Residential East - Etiwanda Avenue West - Southern Calrfomia Edison Comdor C General Plan Designations Protect Site -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - North Etrvvanda Preserve South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Etrvvanda Avenue West - Utility Comdor, Flood Control D Site Charactenstics The protect is situated at the base of the alluvial fan which rs located at the base of the San Gabnel Mountain foothills This site was ongmally a portion of the Rancho EUwanda Planned Development (previously the University Planned ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00986 - MERITAGE February 22, 2006 Page 2 s Development) Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15699, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226, and SUBTT16227 were subsequently approved Rough grading was completed in September 2005. ANALYSIS A Backoround: On August 1, 2001, the City Council approved Development Agreement DA01-01 This agreement is for the Rancho Etiwanda Estates, a 632-lot Master Planned Community encompassing approximately 249 acres Development Agreement DA01-01 requires the applicant to develop within substantial compliance with the Etiwanda North Speafic Plan, incorporating the architecture and design details of the Etiwanda area. Requirements include side on garages, recessed garages, exterior siding, and speafic architectural styles Development Agreement DA01-01 requres the Low Residential development standards for all lots within this tract The property was rough graded in June of 2004, including mass grading and installation of infrastructure. The Master Developer, BCA Development, has agreed to install the main access of the gated community, as well as the decorative perimeter walls These walls will be consistent throughout the entire Master Planned Community The site is bordered by vacant land to the north and west To the south is Day Creek Boulevard, and to the east is Etiwanda Avenue B Design Parameters• The developer is proposing to develop 145 homes within this master planned development A total of 22 (15 percent) of the proposed house product will be a "mock single-story" with a roof pitch and front elevation that emulates asingle-story The two-story plans have been designed with three floor plans and four architectural styles The proposed architectural styles are San Juan, Monterey, Ranch, and Country The Monterey and San Juan elevations incorporate wrought iron detail, recessed windows, precast finial detail, and arched patio/entryway The Monterey style incorporates board and batt siding, wood trellis, balcony, and shutters. The Country style incorporates back and siding with shake siding details, louvered shutters, and exposed rafters The Ranch style incorporates wood kickers, oversized eaves, and louvered shutters. All four sides of homes have articulation, as required by the Design Review Committee. All homes incorporate decorative garage doors and chimneys to match the architectural style of the home Two of the plans include front porches, and two of the plans provide side-on garages The developer is proposing 13 phases and four model homes C Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Stewart, Coleman) reviewed the elevations on January 31, 2006. The Committee recommended approval. D Environmental Assessment An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in June 1991, a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report was certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in October 1999, and an Initial Study Addendum was certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Staff has found the project to be within the scope of the prior Environmental Impact Report and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report, Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, and Initial Study Addendum ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00986 - MERITAGE February 22, 2006 Page 3 • RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review DRC2005-00986 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval and Standard Conditions DC.EW/ma Attachments Exhibit A -Site Utilization Map Exhibit B -Architectural Details Exhibit C -Fence and Wall Plan Exhibit D -Elevations Exhibit E -Floor Plans Exhibit F -Design Revew Committee Action Comments dated January 31, 2006 Draft Resolution of Approval for DRC2005-00986 • ~~ Acting Cdy Planner \ 60' O"' m260V I ~ I I dV'Zp Z2 N2S~ NNNN W z I K200m 2N3KVK NN[VN O d3~K ~0~~00~Q 0000 U y ~ Q J < f KN QONW06 W dZ22 2~KNN~m Q6QQ K~mO ~, C `\ 4 `'"~~~~a`~``.\\\\~ \ ~ ~ ~~,~`~~;,i~'~~~~~ ~\~~y, '~ ~~~ 1~~~~~~~~ ~]'~SOd~B~~\ ~ I ` ~, l``\, 11l'\~1~1, It ~ e ` N ~ d Q 1 I ~ , ' 1\ S ~ • j C ~ II ~ 2 ~ 7 0 a V O QS G O C V ~ ~~ ~~~~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W Z ~ i ~, lI' ~ ~ ~ r Q ~ ~ ~ ' a N 0 ~ w ~', , 1 4 ~ W Q ,~ ~.{ O ff a = ~ ~ l • (~ Z ~~ ~ ~, i ~ .~ll~l i • • V_ z ~11 SHELBY LANE UPPER ETIWANDA MERITAGE HOMES OF CALIFORNIA STYLE GARAGE DOOR FRONT DOOR TYP WINDOW EAVE SHUTTER STYLE ~„ SAN JUAN MONTEREY ~ 8 8 ~ ,~,,.,ro.~,,,o. ~,,,,m ~~~~ RANCH COUNTRY ~ ~~~~ '~ •.,re.~.~~. .~~w:~,: „~~. Ma111KILML ,OPCmM4W 4K11V K 9w'x'' 9 w.._ .X. n I..w SPLITFACE PROPERTY W~ >-Y ~I, ~*, *- WALL DETAILS SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY SEE LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR DETAIL L~11~L ~F~ ~ a ~ssmme WROUGHT IRON MAINTENANCE GATE RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATE TRACT #16227 ~~,~ .~~~ M~PYA4~IY OC ~i~rm~ wb~o lq ~rwoe u~aw md' -L STONE VENEER PE.ASTER w>,r.~nn w~..m M ~~ROYP ac N•uq~ •Vw b~P 10 Igw~vn M~f wy ]RINY ~YV fP4 P~ ~~ SPLITFACE PILASTER avrnm mrv M^0 ~"'MO t~~JOp~NtlilsW r~ YC~ a~~ ~~ av m~ , rJEYACgy1 PILASTER FENCE CONNECf10N rem 11 41 W Vr~ Y WILL use WROUGHTIRDN PENCE TRACT NO 1822' OCIAIIED SRE PWI WALL DETAILS • CMU WALT. WITH STUCCO C ~ u • aq • aooS SHELBY LANE UPPER ETIWANDA MERITAGE HOMES PLAN 3148 .~ ~g ~ WLYI'lllY ~ a~n~e~nal oncawawa 8 ~~ ,. ~w~0 ELEVATION A -- _ -- ELLVX11tJlV b SHELBY LANE UPPER ETIWANDA MERITAGE HOMES • waaan ~ • ixirtrenwu orcnx.o... cnav ~;"~- P L A N 3148 g ~aa ELEVATION C ELEVATION D ~ ~ SHELBY LANE UPPER ETIWANDA MER[TAGE HOMES ROOF PLAN-/8"SCALE ALL PITCHES 4 rx U N O I LEFT ELE V ATION - /t'~ SCALE PLAN 3148 -ELEVATION A -SAN JUAN • ~9 • xoo5 III i uoouv ~cvav o.~umo w~v xc a~ "~..-~..X' 1~ T m Aq REAR ELEVATION-/~"SCALE AIGHT ELEVATION-/~"SCALE SHELBY LANE UPPER ETIWANDA MERITAGE HOMES REAR ELEVATION - ~/~` SCALE ~~ W:AL6 ROOF FLAN -./8" SCALE ALL PITCHES q.u U N O • PLAN LEFT ELEVAT[ON - /4" SCALE ELEVATION B -MONTEREY i rvoaou. uuu ocmganu war me 9~-w ,. 9' W.._ • RIGHT ELEVATION - ~/4" SCALE - • REAR ELEVATION-/4"SCALE ROOF PLAN-/8"SCALE ALL PITCHES q ~a U N O u • Eg • aoo5 SHELBY LANE UPPER ETIWANDA MERITAGE HOMES PLAN 3148 - ELEVATION C -RANCH RIGHT ELEVATION - E/4"SCALE LEFT ELEVATION - /i' SCALE i Bu~Gte 4WOIA ' MOYLECIVR.4 -OVC1RidfEE LWM WL a'~~ua n ] ~ ~ W m ' -~.~'~6 SHELBY LANE UPPER ETIWANDA ROOF PLAN - [/8" SCALE ALL PITCHES 6 [a U N O [x • [g • nooy PLAN MERITAGE HOMES LEFT ELEVATION-[/q"SCALE ELEVATION D -COUNTRY -_I N~ • aaw x~c avwemen ~.... +~ ~'~~ " e w.,... ~~. ~..~.-...~. A7 REAR ELEVATION - [/p'~ SCALE RIGHT ELEVATION - [/q" SCALE • ,.~. uuurenwv ,amno~mu~ arow we g _ ! ~"- r PLAN ~ S 6~/~ ~ ~,,,,,, ~ ' ~~ . ~9 • coos --' 0 SHELBY LANE UPPER ETIWANDA MERITAGE HOMES C~ P LAN_3 ~~6~ Ly1 u ~ ~g ~ zoos w.~e rec~u.•~ caou..K o.~.a.n. 1 ~~ ~. 9' ~ 0 • REAR ELE V ATlON - ~/4' SCALE RIGHT ELEVATION - ~/a"SCALE u . ~g .Taos PLAN~s6i- ELEVATION A -SAN JUAN LEFT ELEVATION-`/4" SCALE uooaai ~rzrn.va ,wcmesm~ rmv nc ~x~ ~~ M~ --•--- A12 SHELBY LANE iTPPFR ETTWANIIA ROOF PLAN - ~/B"SCALE ALL PITCHES ~ ~i U N O SHELBY LANE \J LEFT ELEVATION-/~ SCALE PLAN ~~6L- ELEVATION B -MONTEREY u act"' `'v. .wcO0O1.. n ~ - ec'uu cacaos.... ~R we ~ ~~ Aag REAR ELEVATION - /i' SCALE RIGHT ELEVATION - /a' SCALE ROO E PLAN - /S" SCALE ALL P[TCHES 6 u U N 0 SHELBY LANE UPPER ETIWANDA MERITAGE HOMES `~ V a ~9 • xoa5 PLAN ~g6L- ELEVATION C -RANCH LEFT ELEVATION - ~/4" SCALE ewn ~cmour ~~rn~ man ..c f ~5:: :~ ~~ m _._._.v.: ~4 REAR ELE V AT[ON - ~/y' SCALE RIGHTELE V ATION - s/4'"SCALE ROOF PLAN - i/8" SCALE ALL PITCHES 4 u U N O SHELBY LANE _~ • ~a - t9 • aoo5 LEFT ELEVATION - v/q" SCALE PLA F6rELEVATION D-COUNTRY • uomar Noertc+uw o.cm.sa«w wi...1c g~'.u','~`"S 9' ~.... _ =_.s.=..~s n~tin~ cccvnu.~..-ve ~~^~~ REAR ELEV AT[ON - ~/~' SCALE ROOF PLAN - ~/8"SCALE ALL PITCHES 6 ca U N O ~'. •`~.,r. SHELBY LANE UPPER ETIWANDA MERITAGE HOMES ~ l~~ a, FY u • ~g V ;005 P LA~ i~~~ .~. ,~,~, NwEwG~~ ollOlsuOW e~~s n ~~xw~r SHELBY LANE UPPER ETIWANDA MERITAGE HOMES ELEVATION C woooiar .awi.eaww ~ o.cw.mw ~aew uc u . a9 • aoo5 ~ 1 ~ _` ~..a'.a ...~... ELEVATIOND , i • ~ SHELBY LANE UPPER ETIWA[VDA MERITAGE HOMES i~ ' V AFAR ELEVATION - /q"SCALE ~ ~1 ' '.I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ROOF PLAN-/e'SCALE ALL PITCHES 4 ~z U N O u~_~q • aooy LEFT ELEVATION-~/q"SCALE naawn .wnrtvu+.+v ",~~ ulc nmuaem p ~:sx PLAN 47LS - ELEVATION A -SAN JUAN _ , ~'"""~" _ ~ RIGHT ELE NATION - t/q"SCALE u ~9 ' ~°O5 1 - - _ i SHELBY LANE UPPER ETIWANDA MFPITG(:F Hl1MFC • LEFT ELEVATION - ~/~' SCALE uWOItY I .wWRECTICnL ][YfaXE~ cimuv we i~W= ~a..~_ • ROOF PLAN-~/8"SCALE ALL PITCHESq~aU NO ELEVATIONB -MONTEREY PLAN 471F' - SHELBY LANE UPPER ETIWANDA 0.00F PLAN-/8"SCALI ALL PITCHES 4 ~a U N O u • ~q • mo5 PLAN 47L9- ELEVATION C -RANCH LEFT ELEVATION - /i"SCALE SHELBY LANE _~ ~~. ~.,.~ f ~~ _. 9: wM_ • .: • ,q • Laos • ROOF PLAN-/8"SCALE ALL PITCHES 6 ~~ u N o ELEVATION D-COUNTRY PLAN 47LS" • SHELBY LANE UPPER ETIWANDA MERITAGE HOMES ELEVATION A • • .. PLAN a>ao ss • ~q • aoey A ~~~ mmaav ~rrreawu o.cm.m i~ .. SHELBY LANE UPPER ETIWANDA MERITAGE HOMES PLAN ;cia/'/o7n/~./~J~/~ u ~9 • xoos c~ / /VIV nx.nrE . •e.oers.. raae r+c ~x_ ~_° 0 ~ ~w B ~.._ • • V • ROOF PLAN - •/8" SCALE ALL PITCHES {.a U N O LEFT ELEV ATION - ~/q' SCALE PLAN alao ' ELEVATION A -SAN JUAN SHELBY LANE UPPER ETIWANDA HERITAGE HOMES rs • ~g • coos ~~' ROOF PLAN - ~/8" SCALE ALL PfTCHES a~a U N O PLAN ciao' ELEVATION B -MONTEREY • • • SHELBY LANE UPPER E'I'IWANDA U SHELBY LANE UPPER ETIWANDA .x • ~9 • xoo5 } • SHELBY LANE • i n n n n C T l lR/ D N7 Tl D \~V • ROOF PLAN -./8"SCALE ALL PITCHES 6 ~a U N O PLAN ciao - ELEVATION D -COUNTRY • ~_ V_ a CW~ _~ • SHELBY LANE UPPER ETIWANDA MERITAGE HOMES OF CALIFORNIA ns us.-oce ar PLAN 3 " u • sq • aoo3 3µB SF TOTAL MAa 5A ~•~! i GREAT RM DID BR 3 d~-~~ w IJ ~ BR ~ E:~ PARLOR/ -- STUDY POPGN qi~M • SHELBY LANE ort ekc fa'o• . w'-q7 an.s eoa MASTER ~dC BR 2/ RE~v T ~PqN / L' Td N1. ,~ 4 TEEN LOFT D ar.w~ 8R 4 B ' ~ wu ~ anAnax SECOND FLOOR - ~qqz SF PLAN ~56> )s6~ SF TOTAL zz .9 • zoay UPPER ETIWANDA MERITAGE HOMES OF CALIFORNIA I FAMILY I W?~dM 1 ~.., »~. SF DINING Li roncN I - I xuaan MO111EMML •dICTn.MW caour «c ~~_ _-•^^ AB ~-- -r E ~ ~ ! ~ PARLOR/ SNDY OPIIdU1 ORIG[ (N94 srl oPf10lUL an s (.31a 5f'1 SHELBY LANE UPPER ETIWANDA MERITAGE HOMES OF CALIFORNIA W W u ~y • xoo3 MASTER RETREAT OPTION PLAN X561 .~. ~~, ,~~ • ~~.,aw.. fl ~ _... _-..~.__.Ay SHELBY LANE UPPER ETIWANDA .1ERITAGE HOMES OF CALIFORNIA r- ~, ~o~ iM0 _~y li__,NOOK~ KITGHENi ' FAY F m ~-I - ~ --- i--t ~ -~~I -~ ' LIBRARY/ OFD E r0 BRn E/ `~lA SECOND FLOOR - Lyz4 SF PLAN ~n 3IL5 SF TOTAL u • Ey • xao5 GAS TM 6• ! CASITA W/EATH ~ x7z SF v~ Y Mrto coua* "2=6AY 6ARA6E -- -- ai.:e i-- - uvown NKMECNIIAL •U~<0~• cvaw we ~•~ ~~ i • ~ ~R~ CASITA . x7: SF orr aac BD'-D' % D'4'f `^~' ~~ MASTER mr ~ Q ,rr ~m 7; ; RE _===J_.== ~ rte: e~ T C KIDS_ COQ ~ '" ~ BR 4 ' BA~,an'a era r" p L ~,;, Q - --~ ; ------------------- SECOND FLOOR PLAN ciao Poo SFTOTAL ~x • ~9 • aooy SHELBY LANE UPPER ETI ANDAFr-----` i-~ MERITAGE HO ES '-~--ort ~Ano ~-_!_' ~ f0'? X D'-D') _ M1 ~ I ~ r , ~L_J_- - KITOHEN ,,,,,• _._i,, ®-XI .-~ NOOK { ~ FAMILY , ~._ __.__~ --r_ _y, ~ ~ I r-a •, 4 L_~ , r -__ , , ~ ' ~ ~ >a _.- ....m~ -.._ -.-----_~ pm LA11DItY 7.Yd 'r, ::i -F=,,,-- ' • -- Dl~r 6DV FLOOR - ORIOIIAL GNRA W BAM 51R11D51/' V r--sa Gf' ORIDIUL GASITA I-BAY 6ARASE>- - --'-orr usrtA .•oir nc _ ~am.~ x... ~ {~..... _~.'r.._...A23 OTf EeJPOOM 6 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7 50 p.m Emily Cameron January 31, 2006 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00986 - MERITAGE HOMES - A request to develop 145 homes on 52 54 acres of land in the Low Residential District, located on the north side of Day Creek Boulevard, east of the Southern California Edison Corridor - APN. 0225-071-47, 51 and 0225-081-08, 09, 14, and 15. Related file Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16227 Background On August 1, 2001, the City Council approved Development Agreement DA01-01 This agreement is for the Rancho Etiwanda Estates, a 632 lot Master Planned Community encompassing approximately 249 acres The Development Agreement regwres the applicants to develop within substantial compliance with the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, incorporating the architecture and design details of the Etiwanda area Regwrements include side on garages, recessed garages, exterior siding, and specific architectural styles. The Development Agreement regwred the Low Residential regwrements for all lots within this tract The property was rough graded in June of 2004 The area was mass graded and infrastructure was installed The master developer has agreed to install the main access of the gated commurnty, as well as the decorative perimeter walls These walls will be consistent throughout the entire master planned commurnty The site is bordered by vacant land to the north and west, by Day Creek Boulevard to the south; and by Stillwater Place and a portion of • Tract 16227, being built by K Hovnanian, to the east Design Parameters• The protect site is located within the "Upper Etiwanda" neighborhood which has its own urnque architectural design guidelines per the Etiwanda North Speafic Plan (ENSP) The ENSP regwres that a mix of the following primary architectural styles be used for at least two-thirds of the units• Bungalow, Ranch, Monterey, or San Juan Up to one-third of the urnts may use these styles• Country, Victorian, or Santa Barbara Removal. The proposed homes are two-story with one floor plan which incorporates significant single story elements A total of 22 (15 percent) of the proposed house product will be a "mock single-stork' with a roof pitch and front elevation which emulates asingle-story The two-story plans have been designed with three floor plans and four architectural styles. The proposed architectural styles are San Juan, Monterey, Ranch, and Country The Monterey and San Juan elevation incorporate wrought iron detail, recessed windows, precast finial detail, and arched patio/entryway The Monterey style incorporates board and batt siding, wood trellis, balcony, and shutters. The Country style incorporates brick and siding with shake siding details, louvered shutters, and exposed rafters. The Ranch style incorporates wood kickers, oversized eaves, and louvered shutters as well All four sides of all homes have articulation All homes incorporate decorative garage doors and chimneys to match the architectural style of the home Four of the plans include front balconies, and two of the plans have side-on garages, which total 60 percent of the total product The developer is proposing to bwld the homes in 14 phases. Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion • ~x~~,~ir ~ ~.~ DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2005-00986 - MERITAGE HOMES January 31, 2006 • Page 2 Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this prolect 1. The applicant has worked diligently with staff Together with the Development Agreement and discussions with staff, there are no major issues. Secondary Issues Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues 1 The Monterey and San Juan styles shall incorporate a functional balcony as a standard, not an option This is in addition to the standard balconies which have been added to the rear elevations faang any major street (50 percent minimum). All balconies shall be constructed with large columns that match the architecture of the homes. 2. Oversized window tnm on the Monterey style shall be incorporated on all four elevations The front elevation has the oversized trim, whereas the sides and rear elevation do not 3 Provide only dual shutters on the Ranch style Revise shutter detail to add on both sides of windows where applicable (nght elevation, Plan 3715) 4 Provide a finished cap (with finial) on all proposed gang mailboxes. • Policv Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the prolect design without discussion 1. Boulders from the prolect site shall be utilized and integrated as part of the front yard Landscape Plan, per the Master Plan Resolution of Approval 2 Driveways shall be colored and scored in a diagonal pattern for additional entryway detail 3 Submit a detail of the the work accents proposed on the Monterey style pnor to submitting construction drawings. 4 All corner side walls shall be setback 12 feet from the curb at the sidewalk if the property line is adjacent Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee recommend approval of the prolect subject to the above revisions Design Review Committee Action Members Present• Fletcher, Stewart, Coleman Staff Planner Emily Cameron The Committee Reviewed the prolect and recommended approval subject to the applicant working with staff on the below issues ~c.l DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2005-00986 - MERITAGE HOMES January 31, 2006 Page 3 The applicant is requred to prowde additional balcones on the plotting of the San Juan or Monterey style, subfect to review by staff prior to final plotting The matonty of balconies will be required, however, where it is deemed an inappropriate location (minimal setback etc ), the balcony may be omitted 2 The applicant shall prowde diagonal scored concrete with no colored concrete regwred. The applicant clanfied concerns about the following issues as well The 6-inch by 6-inch tiles proposed shall be provided as a block of 4 tiles total 2 The Ranch style shutters will be modified to provide a full shutter style (both sides) CJ • ~~~ • RESOLUTION NO 06-09 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00986, A PROPOSAL OF 145 DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ON 52 54 ACRES IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD EAST OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CORRIOR, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN 0225-0717, 51 AND 0225-081-08, 09, 14, AND 15 A Recitals 1 Meritage Homes filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2005-00986, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 22nd day of February 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred • B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced meeting on February 22, 2006, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby spenfically finds as follows a The application applies to the property located north of Day Creek Boulevard and west of Etiwanda Avenue, with a street frontage of approximately 1,600 feet on Day Creek Boulevard and a lot depth of 1,050 feet along Etiwanda Avenue, and is presently improved with rough grading and under construction for curb, gutter and utilities, and b The property to the north of the subject site is vacant land, the property to the south consists of single-family residential, the property to the east is under construction, and the property to the west is a 240-foot wide Southern California Edison (SCE) utility corridor, and c The project consists of development rewew of 145 lots master planned by BCA Development, and . d The sewer, storm dram, detention basin, curb, and gutter are currently under construction, and X39 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 06-09 DRC2005-00986 - MERITAGE HOMES February 22, 2006 Page 2 e The project conforms to the bask Development Standards of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan with required architectural elevations, slope requirements, and overall protect density 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced meeting and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth m Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and conctudes as follows The proposed protect is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan, and b The proposed use is in accord wrath the obtectives of the Development Code and the purposes or the distract in which the site is located, and c The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity • 4 Staff has found the project to be within the scope of the protect covered by a pnor Environmental Impact Report certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervsors in June 1991, a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report was certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in October 1999, and an Initial Study Addendum was certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in August 2001, and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report, Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, and Initial Study Addendum 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Deaartment 1) All dnveways shall have a maximum grade of 10 percent If necessary, dnveways shall be lengthened and the garage setbacks increased in order to achieve a 10 percent grade 2) All comer lot sideyard walls shall have a setback of 12 feet from the curb at the sidewalk if propeRy line adtacent 3) Wall heights are limited to a maximum of 6 feet Separate retaining walls are limited to 4 feet in height 4) Boulders from the project site shall be utilized and integrated as part of the front yard Landscape Plan, per the Master Plan Resolution of Approval ~Tv PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 06-09 DRC2005-00986 - MERITAGE HOMES February 22, 2006 . Page 3 5) Monterey and San Juan elevation shall incorporate a functional balcony as a standard, not an option Where the standard balcony is not practical, it may be omitted The balconies not used must be reviewed and approved by the City Planner. Engineenng Department 1) Conditions of Approval for Tentative Trail SUBTT16227 shall apply 2) Pnor to Budding Permit Issuance, the "Master Budder" needs to complete the following a) Record protect Covenants, Conditions, and Restnchons (CCBRs) b) Complete LMD plans (Drawnng 2020-L), mGudmg an alternate streetlight proposal across the Southern California Edison Comdor 3) Before the 150th Building Pennit is issued for Rancho Etiwanda Estates, Day Creek Boulevard and Etrvvanda Avenue shall be open to traffic • 4) Before any occupancy, A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA 5) Pay the Traffic Grcutation Improvement Fee pnor to Budding Pennit issuance currently estimated at $2,348 per residence, although a reimbursement agreement submitted for actual costs is expected soon 6) All development phases v~nll regwre two means of access if any lot in that phase is more than 600 feet from the pnmary access Construct the Mediterranean, Artic, Indian Ocean, and Stillwater connection ~nnth the second phase 7) The Cary Street Improvement Plan Mylars shall be revised and approved by the City Engineer so that the dnveway wndths at the back of the sidewalk do not exceed 40 percent of the lot frontage Environmental Mitigation Measures 1) The protect shall implement all pertinent mitigation measures identfied in the Environmental Impact Report that was prepared and cert~ed by the County of San Bemardino Board of Supervisors in June 1991, the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report that was certified by the County of San Bemardino Board of Supervisors in October 1999, and the Initial Study Addendum that was certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in August 2001 • // ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 06-09 DRC2005-00986 - MERITAGE HOMES February 22, 2006 Page 4 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planrnng Commission of the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of February 2006, by the follo~nnng vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS C~ L J rya COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2005-00986 SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW OF 145 LOTS APPLICANT: HERITAGE HOMES LOCATION: NORTH OF DAYCREEK BOULEVARD, WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requin:ments 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any adion brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or in the aRemative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the Crty, Its agerrts, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, Its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such agion The Crty may, at rts sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 06-09, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be Induded on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the constructioNgreding activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No eMensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained In accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, extenor matenals and colors, landsceping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, . Development Code regulations, the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, and the Master Plan ~~~ ComoleLOn Date _/ ~ / / / / / / Protect No DRC2005-00885 Completion Date D. 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_l- State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to . occupancy 4 Revised site plans and bulding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for City Planner rewew and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, Irrigation, and street Improvement plans shall be coordinated for ~_/- consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval In the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance wdh ail sections of the Development Code, all _/~ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bulding permit issuance 7 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with _J~- all receptacles shielded from public view 8 All building numbers and individual units shall be identrfied in a clear and concise manner, ~~- including proper illumination 9 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property ~~_ homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape owner , maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer rewew and approved prior to the issuance of budding permits 10 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall ~~- condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work wdh the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property ' . s owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project perimeter 11 Construct block wails between homes (i a ,along interior side and rear property lines), rather than ~~- wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency 12 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry _J-/- 13 Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to J~- maintain an open feeling and enhance views. 14 On comer side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk The _/J_ 5-foot walVfence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the regwred street trees Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for City Planner rewew and approval prior to issuance of bulding permits The parkway landscaping including shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner The trees , developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance mat as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash d f t d ar or an regwrement, in a s deposit on any property Bui lding Design 1 All roof appurtenances, Including air conditioners and other roof mounted egwpment and/or _/_/_ projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as regwred by the Plannrng Department Such screening shall be architecturally rated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details inte g shall be Included in budding plans- • 2 ~~~ Protect No DRC2005-00885 Comolehon Date E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) • 1 Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street F. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwldtng permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 3 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and vrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ff of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent vrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 For single-family residential development, ail slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 5 Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be regwred per the Development . Code and Etiwanda North Specific Plan This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting 6 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department 7 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department G. Environmental Mitigation measures are required for the project The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $495 00 prior to the issuance of bwldtng permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertormance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds maybe used bythe City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit H. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Mutti-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for . mailboxes with adequate fighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits -~-~- -J-/- -/~- ~~_ ~-~- ~~. ~~- ~~- ~~_ _/~_ 3 /% ~[~ Project No DRC2008-00885 Comoletion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: . NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) I. General Regwrements Single-Family Tract Conditions Apply: 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following ~-/- a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceding and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single Itne diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Protect Number (i e , DRC2005-00986) clearly Identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _J-/- Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are requred prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_J the City pnor to permit issuance ~ 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls -J-/- 5 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can ~~_ contact the Bulding and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements J. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be ~~_ marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2005-00986) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Bulding and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential protect or mator addition, the applicant _/~_ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bulding and Safety Official after tracUparcel map -/~_ recordation and pnor to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p.m and 6 30 a m Monday ~~_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays • 4 ~ ~~ Protect No DRC2005-00885 Completion Date K. New Structures • 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for requred occupancy separations 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions L. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with California Bulding Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to pertorm such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for ail new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Ciwl Engineer PPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Street Improvements 1 Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated bytechnical codes and for which a permit is regwred unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted bythe City Council, except that in developments containing more than one bulding or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as regwred by conditions of approval of development In no case shall mare than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development N. General Requirements and Approvals Prior to the issuance of bulding permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable rf at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first bulding permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect \_J -~-~- ~-~- _/~- _/~_ -~-~- _/~ ~-~. -~-~- -~-~- ~-/_ 5 ~~~/ Prgect No DRC2005-00885 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • O. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors ~-/- 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within _/_/_ 40 Inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 3 Ali garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devtces ~~_ P. Windows 1 All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devtces and should not be able to be lifted _!~_ from frame or track in any manner Q. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for ntghtttme _/~_ visibdiry APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED 6 n~ p' T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE February 22, 2006 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM. Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner BY Vance Pomeroy, Contract Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17745 - JASEN GROHS - A proposed subdivision to convert 60 existing residential apartment units to 60 residential condominiums on 5 72 acres of land in the Medwm Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) located at 9866 through 9940 Highland Avenue - APN 0201-395-01 through -15 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION • A Project Density Zoning - Medium Density (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Protect - 10 49 dwelling urnts per acre existing B Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Single-Faintly Residential and Vacant Land, Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Highland Avenue, I-210 Freeway East - Flood Control Channel, Church and Vacant Land; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling urnts per acre) West - Smgie-Family Residential, Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) C General Plan Designations Protect Site -Medium Density Residential North - Low-Medium Density Residential South - I-210 Freeway East - Low Density Residential West - Low-Medwm Density Residential D Site Characteristics The subtect site is currently a fully improved multiple-family residential property with driveways, landscaping, fencing, and other amenities The site slopes generally from the north to the south with ingress and egress from Highland Avenue ANALYSIS A. General The subtect site is currently improved with 60 apartments arranged m fourpiexes A recreation bwlding and other amenties are located in the center of the complex All buildings are accessed through a pnvate driveway off of Highland Avenue The ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT17745 - JASEN GROHS February 22, 2006 Page 2 subdivision of this property wdl convert the property into 60 residential condominium units on 15 numbered lots for the bwldings and immediate surrounding common area and one lettered lot for the general open space and driveway access The proposed subdivision will not have any land use or planning impact because the site is fully developed The protect site is located at an existing multiple-family residential development which will not be significantly altered by the conversion to condominiums The proposed conversion to condominiums would increase the supply of affordable ownership units within the City consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan Housing Element B Condominwm Conversion Reowrements The applicant has submitted a written statement summarizing their compliance with City standards (Exhibit E) The protect and regwred physical elements report, bwlding history report, and other testing and survey reports have been reviewed by City departments and found to be in compliance with the property development standards of the Development Code All noticing requirements for condominwm conversions in the Subdivision Map Act have been fulfilled. No new bwldings or exterior modifications are proposed Consequently, the only plan needing review is the proposed Tentative Tract Map On July 1, 2005, the existing renters were notified by the owner, via certified mail, and given an opportunity to purchase their unit C Design Review Committee: Although no new bwldings or exterior modifications are proposed, as regwred by Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Coleman) reviewed the protect on December 20, 2005 The Committee recommended approval of the protect as presented • D Technical Review Committee. The Committee reviewed the protect and recommended approval subtect to the conditions outlined in the attached Draft Resolution of Approval E Environmental Assessment The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study Staff completed Part II of the Initial Study and found that there could be no significant adverse environmental impacts from the protect If the Planning Commission concurs, then an issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the protect through adoption of the attached olution with c ditions, and issuance of a Negative Declaration Re gctfully s matte , Dan /Coleman Acting City Planner Attachments Exhibit A -Tentative Tract Map Exhibit B -Site Plan Exhibit C -Preliminary Landscape Pian Exhibit D -Design Review Committee Action Comments dated December 20, 2005 . Exhibit E -Applicant's Statement Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17745 ~~ u • E .dwmro voxdnaluaoxva 3aNiI~V dXINdMM N06tliN10'! IIIIYYeGMW WW1 M NpLV]Ol LJ3fOYd ~ ~ T 1 Z ~+ # 3 n~ ~Y- ..V.~ ~~~ p ®~ LCD Z ~ a U Q ~c W _> H Z W I"" ~5 Eac a a ~ ~ry~ r. o`a ~ 8~~~ ~~g a b € a ~ ~ ~o RAH $~'~ ~~~5 seR py4~a~~es~~Z ~Eo y~y~~~ge3~ d4^°~~G~`T ~wa{yaaaa~.g e" a a ~8~$ ~~a~ ~ ~~h3 ~ z ` 2 ~ Y . °, Q o - ^n_ ~ Lf y5y a m Q Ua° w ° ~a~g [ ~ iL t 0 a~YC ~ NAYS ~~~~ $k i~38 ~ w~~ ~~~~ i~3`~~v 3 kr y~~$5 ~~~~~$ a n U laJ c.iNr lnJ r~ .muva rWrlNr ! ~d 1pIWPofJMVi 3 X11 Y11 ]3ir0 VLWI voi aaNVC~aa 'aQj `SajE .r E-H ~~ i~ ~ tl „ G 8~ E ~ ~~~EaBFF~~ ~ tt ~ e ~ ~ _ _ ~~eE~i@88'rII N$ _ m m 5at~i~ii~1 ~ 3 8 r ~ ~ ~ w p ~ ` ~~_~$$~ ~ jay ~' 3p S ~~ ~ Q ~a-E-~~~~~~ $ ~~ e . m .. e ~ ~ ~j~8a@~ g 3S~ 3~~~~em Q 6$a€a~t 2asE z a a W W 3y Cm ~ ~ Gd~~ n„~~~ ~~ ` ~ g ~ ~ J i m .~. __ __ !~ ~I~I IN~VS~~d"a~~~ ®~N~9®~ ~ilf~4f1~®~ I l a ~ 4 ~ E ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ rg 3 ~ E a a a & Y `~ i R 31V QPo-MJH i k g a~~@ x a ,- a 3a = g ~ ~~~__I ssaaessas^. cva^ ~` ~`exx a ~ a ~e " ~~'~a~zRs~'~RRawwRZ~ ~~v~r ~5 5 ~_: ~€~ ~ ?~$a ~ vozok€.z~~sse~oe~a~I a8_,a: ? ~azz$$e ~°ax aka S§4S ~e~_...,_.,e_ ~~ 3 ~~' a Y~~° t. ..ae Y~9-.y~~yC ¢C''gsL S.'i. c~v°~ YbsE i~~d °~E ~ 3P. °b~L~CO ~4aS9 T3SvS o m °a a e~ a e$ Y Y~: $ti ° ia$ A~ A z'r i' a: ~ Q Z c~ G Q U U O 2 U Z LL Y Y 'e n~ 0 0 N . ~~ N U W O V Z_ Z Z Q d O W W a N Q e ~o $ t a ~ l2 i 3AV ONVZfOW ~I e. V z ~i ~~ ~~ z =s d n ~O O ~ T m o 70 C m a m c~ ~ v ~ _ ~ ` O o - ~ ~ o C Z o C7 Z cr D Z ~ ~ O Z D F §'s~~ ~ S ~ a i 9 ~ ~ i ] s 5 • r7 CCU 4~~r,~U ~~ x q ti p- x E'i 7°i~ ~~_9 a 3~ ~~~~ s ~ ^i~f :~° ,~~_ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7 00 p m Vance Pomeroy December 20, 2005 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17745 - JASEN GROHS - A request to convert 60 existing residential apartment units to 60 residential condominwms on 5 72 acres of land in the Medwm Residential Distract (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located at 9866 through 9940 Highland Avenue - APN 0201-395-01 through 15 Design Parameters The subject site is currently improved with 60 apartments arranged in fourplexes. A recreation building and other amenities are located in the center of the complex All buildings are accessed through a private driveway off of Highland Avenue The subdivision of this property will convert the property into 60 residential condominium units on 15 numbered lots for the bwldmgs and immediate surrounding common area and 1 lettered lot for the general open space and driveway access The Condominium Conversion regwrements of the Development Code have been reviewed by several departments and found to be satisfactory All noticing regwrements for condommwm conversions in the Subdivision Map Act have been fulfilled ' The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code regwres that all subdivision maps be reviewed by the Design Review Committee (DRC), however, no new buildings or exterior modifications are proposed Consequently, the only plans needing Committee review is the proposed Tentative . Tract Map Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Committee recommend approval of the proposed tract map as submitted Design Review Committee Action Members Present McPhail, Stewart, Coleman Staff Planner Vance Pomeroy The Committee recommended approval of the project as presented C~ . 17.2230 Application Information required. A Terms of proposed assistance, discount, or other financing program to be offered, if any, to present residents for the purpose of subsequent unit purchase, B. Proposed program of relocation assistance to be offered by the applicant, rf any, C. Proposed homeowner's association (HOA) fee, D Names and addresses of all tenants E The sub-divider shall submit evidence that a certified letter of norification of intent to convert was sent to each tenant for whom a signed copy of the nonce is not submitted. F A report field test by a qualified independent testing agency as specified m the Uniform Building Code showing that the common walls (wall to wall) provide the same airborne sound insulation as required by the most current Uniform Building Code requirements adopted by the city If the report shows that they aze not met then he will complete improvements necessary to meet these requirements pnor to any sale.. • G. A copy of the proposed CCBcR's which will apply and which hall include an agreement for common area maintenance, including facilities and landscaping together with an estimate of the initial assessment fees anticipated for such maintenance; a descnption of vehiculaz access azeas vntlun a project, and an indication of appropriate responsibilities for maintenance of all utility lines and services for each unit (See CC&R's enclosed). H. Physical Inspection Report: A report detailing the condition and estimating the remaining useful life of each element of the project owned proposed for conversion,: Roofs, Foundations, Extenor Paint, Paved Surfaces, Mechanical Systems, Electrical Systems, Plumbing Systems including sewerage systems swimming pools sprinkler systems for landscaping; Utility delivery systems, Central or community heating and air conditioning systems, Fire protection systems including automatic spnnkler system, alarm systems, or standpipe systems, and structural elements Such report shall be prepared by an appropriately licensed contractor or architect or by a registered civil or structural engineer other than the owner. For any element whose useful life is less than five yeazs, a replacement cost estimate shall be provided, 2 A Structural Pest Control Report -See Packet • 3. A Building History Report of the following. a The date of construction of all elements of all elements of the project (answer . Bmldmg permits were issued ] 0-13-88) b A statement of the ma3or uses of said project since construction (Answer: Prior to 1988-89 the property was previously a 5 71 acre pazcel of land m a residential community. In 1989 the property was subdivided into 15 four amt residential bwldings for the purposes of tncome property c. A date and description of each maJor repatr or renovation of any structure or structural element since the date of construction For the purposes of this subsection a "major repatr" shall mean any repair for which an expenditure of more than one thousand dollars was made Answer: a) Umt 9916 D - $5,000 was spent on redoing the plumbing, new fiberglass tub, new shower valves. b) A1160 amts new carpeting and new vinyl floors c) Spa replastenng, re-chip $3,800 d) Entry Gates - 4 new gate motors $4,800 Note Information provided by on-site maintenance Dean at Brendean Construction and Home Repair Service, 19310 Rose Lane, Bloomington, CA 92316 Ph. 909-877-3987 d. Statement regazdmg current ownership of all improvements and underlying land (Answer: Curently the property is owned by JCG-JDG, Investment LLC. Currently there is no easements or liens on the existing ProPertY)• • • C/~ C~ LJ 17.22.040 Property Development Standards A General Requirements. 1. Each dwelling unit shall conform to current nose and energy msulaUon standazds required by the latest adopted Uniform Building Code or other applicable law or regulations R 11 Insulation on both sides of comm. wall-Acceptable 2 Each unit shall have installed smoke detectors as required by the latest adopted edition of the Uniform Building Code -Yes, Hard Wire Detectors, see Floor Plans). 3. Each unit shall provide pazking as regwred by Section 17 12 040 -Acceptable, See Site Plans) 4. Each dwelling unit shall be sepazately metered for gas and electncrty - (Yes, Noted on Plans) 5 Each dwelling unit shall be provided with separate water shut-off valves and electricity main shut off- (Yes, Noted on plans). 6. Each azea for trash placement and pick up shall be adequately designated and all refuse shall be removed on a regulaz scheduled bans from the premises 7. Permanent mechanical equipment which the building official determines is a potential source of vibratron or noise shall be shock mounted or isolated, or otherwise mounted in a manner approved by the building official to lessen the transmission of vibration and noise. 8 Illuminated addresses and, if found necessary by the planning commission, directory maps for all units shall be proximately displayed from appropriate public or private access wrtlun or adjacent to the project - (We will meet City requirements). 9 At least one hundred and twenty-five cubic feet of enclosed, weatherproof, lockable storage space is to be provided for each unit This storage space shall be m addition to that ordinary container (Noted, see Floor Plans). 10 A laundry area shall be provided m each unit, or if common laundry azeas aze provided, such faciLUes shall consist of not less than one automatic washer and dryer for each of five units or fraction thereof (Noted, See Floor Plans). 11. The applicant shall provide written certification to the buyer of each unit on the initial sale after conversion that any dishwashers, garbage disposals, stoves, refrigerators, hot water tanks, and air condmoners that aze provided aze m worlnng condition as of the close of escrow At such Ume as the homeowners ` association takes over management of the development, the applicant shall provide written certification to the association that any pool and pool egwpment and any appliances and mechanical equipment to be owned m common by the associatwn is in working condition B. Application requirement. The applicant shall provide the city with a tentative subdivision map in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act and local ordinance and a development plan of the project including, but not limited to• 1 Dimensions and location of each building or unit and the location of all fences or walls; See Site Plan 2. Building elevations indicating the type of constructton material existing and proposed; See Site Plan t39 3. Typical floor plans of existing amts with squaze footages of each amt indicated • and the number of amts per plan, See Site Plan 4 Location of common azea and amemties existing or proposed; See Site Plan 5 Location and dimensions of parking garages, carport pazkmg azea, access ways, and any other on-site azea reserved for vehicular use; See Site Plan 6 Location of areas for exterior storage space for inthvidual occupants; 7 Landscape plan per city standazds which specifies proposed trees, shrubs, plants, and ground cover, and indicates existing landscape massing Species, quantity, and sizes shall be indicated for proposed landscaping only See Landscape Plan. 8. Evidence that a notice of intent to convert shall be delivered to each existing tenant's dwelling amt. The form of the nonce shall be as approved by the commumty development department and shall contain no less than the following a. Name and address of current owner b. Name and address of the proposed subdivider c Approx date on which the tentative map is proposed to be filed d Tenant's nght to purchase e. Tenant's right of notification to vacate f Tenant's nght of termination of lease g. Provision of special cases and h Provision of moving expenses i. Tenants Right To Purchase, As provided in Government Code Section 66427.1 (b), any present tenant or tenants of any unit shall be given a nontransferable nght of first refusal to purchase the amt occupied at a price no greater than the pnce offered to the general public. The right of . first refusal shall extend for at least sixty days from the date of issuance of the subdivision public report on commencement of sales, whichever date is later, ~ Vacation of Umts. Each non purchasing tenant, not m default under the obhgations of the rental agreement or lease under wlch he or she occupies his or her unit, shall have not less than one hundred twenty days from the date of receipt of notification from the owner of his or her intent to convert or from the filing date of the final subdivision map, whichever date is later, to find substitute housing and to relocate, k. Other information as may be deemed necessary by the community development department 9. Any other information that the director of community development deems necessary to determine whether the proposed project is consistent with this chapter. (Ord. 399 S 1, 1989; Ord. 211 S 4 (part), 1983; Ord. 119 S 4, 1980) • ~~~ s • ENVIRONMENTAL - INFORMATION FORM (Part 1 -Initial Study) City orrianUro Cucamonga (Please type or pnnt cleaAy using !nk Use the tab key to move from one line to the next Irne ) Planning Department (809)477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to, traffic, noise, biological, drainage, and geological reports may be required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part II as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that rt rs the responsrbrldy of the applicant to ensure that the appl~cat~on is complete at the time of submittal, City staff will not be evadable to perform work roqurred to provide mrssrng information Appl~cabon Number for fhe protect to which this form pertains SUBTT17745 Protect Trtle The Highlands Name a Address of pro/ect owner(s) Jasen Grohs Danny Grohs, Josh Grohs, 119E St Joseph Street, Arcadia, CA 91006 Name 8 Address of developeror protect sponsor Jasen Grohs Danny Grohs Josh Grohs 119E St Joseph Street, Arcadia, CA 91006 C 1MUr-Sol ConstruGionl9866 Highland Avenue, Rancho Cucamo~\C~of Rancho Cucamonga Enviommental Infonnalion Forth docPage 1 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 s • Contact Person & Address Robert Artura 119E St Joseph Street Arcadia CA 91006 Jasen Grohs. Dannv Grohs, Josh Grohs, 119E St Joseph Street, Name 6 Address of person prepanng this form (d different from above) Telephone Number 626-447-0558 ext 33, 626-232-3251 • '1) Pmwde a full scale (tJ-1/L x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) whrch includes the pro/act site, and rnd~cate the site boundanes 2) Pmwde a set o(color photographs that show representative wows into the site from the north, south, east, and west, views into and from the site fmm the pnmary access points that serve the site, and representative views of srgnficant lectures from the sde Include a map showing location of each photograph 3) Pre/ect Location (descnbe) 9866 Highland Avenue Rancho Cucamonga 1 Block N of the 210 f-W 1/2 Block East of Archibald . 4) Assessols Parcel Numbers (attach addfional sheet rf necessary) 0201-395-01 through 15 'S) Gross Srte Area (arJsq R) 268,765 2/6 17 Acres '6) Nef Srte Area (total sde size minus area of public streets 6 pmposed 249,002 square feet/ or 5 72 dedications) ac 7) Descnbe any pmposed general plan amendment or zone change whrch would affect the pm/act site (attach add~honal sheet r/necessary) None • r- • ~- C VulurSol ConstrudroM9866 Highland Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga\Cdy of ancho Cucamonga Enwommental Infonnahon Form docPage 2 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 Informahon rnd~cated by an astensk (') rs not required ofnon-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by stab 8) Include a descnphon o/all permits which will be necessary hom the City of Rancho Cucamonga and othergovemmenfal • agencies rn order to fully implement the pm/ect Electric Water and Budd & Safety Permits 9) Descnbe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the protect including information on topography, sod stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Descnbe any exishng structures on site (including age and condrton) and the use of the structures Attach photographs of significant features descnbed In addition, cite all sources ofinformahon (~ a ,geological and/orhydmlogicstuilies, biotic and archeological surveys, trafic studies) The sublect site consists of 16 conbguous parcels with each of the sublecYs 15 buildings located on its own respective parcel positioned around a common lot that provides fir mgres/egress and common area amenities Topography The sublect site is gently downward sloping from north to south . Exposure The sublect site has exposure to street traffic along Highland Avenue Views The sublect property offers limited aty and mountain views Drainage The drainage flow is toward the southern end of the site and Highland Avenue Sods As no soil or geological reports were available for review it is assumed that there are no sod conditions which negatively affect the sublect site Bwlding Age The bwldmg was constructed in 1988-89 and is approximately 16 years old The bwld is considered to be in good condition 10) Descnbe the known cultural and/orhistoncalaspects ofthe site Cite all sources ofinformahon (books, published reports and oral history) • C wlurSOl ConstruGionU866HighIand Avenue, Rancho Cucamong~y/~ancho Cucamonga Enwommental Infonnahon Fonn docPage 3 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 s • 11) Descnbeanynotsesourcesandthetrlevels[hatnowatlectthestte(aucraft,madwaynoise,etc)andhowtheywdlaffect proposed uses Medium amount of noise cumin from HI hland Avenue traffic • 12) Descnbe the proposed protect in detail This should provide an adequate descnphon ofthe stte in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed protect Indicate rf there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion o/each increment Attach addrhonal sheet(s) d necessary The proposed protect is a 60 unit condominium conversion The protect well be sold In phase rang- Inq from 6 10 phase releases We will fix up 6-8 units In each phase which will Include pambng the mtenor _ And extenor new appliances new carpet new common rod Iron fencing in the walk ways and rear patios, Re-tile and re-deck the pool area add additional landscaping I e flowers to the front entry's, etc We anticipate to be full competed with fix up and sales within one Year . 13) Descnbe the surrounding properties, including inlormat~on on plants and animals and any cultural, histoncal, orscenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc ), intensity olland use (one-family, apartrnent houses, shops, depaRment stores, etc) and scale o/development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) The current land use is residentiai multi-family apartment houses Height Is 25' Set-backs are all met at the time of construction (existing bwlding) Surround properties the the East is a dirt lot to the west Is single family residentlai houses, to the North is residential land and houses Plants Include trees, flowers, rass • 14) Will the proposed protect change the pattern, scale, or ch/aracter o/the surrounding general area of the prolect~ C whir-Sol Construdionl9866 Highland Avenue, Rancho Cu ReV n~;~ty o~ancho Cucamonga Enwommental Information Form docPage 4 of 10 ~ ~ The proposed protect well enhance the look of the area since the buildings well look new 15) Indicate the type ofshort-term and long-term norse to be generated, mcludrng source and amount How will these norse levels affect adjacent properties and ornsrte uses What methods of soundproofing a2 proposed We had ordered an acoustical test and the results had Indicated that the as-built common wall assemblies are adequate to meet the FSTC 45 minimum field sound rating No mitigation is necessary The acoustic test was run by Gordon Bncken & Associates Property to the East is a large lot Property to the West is a single family housing protect Area to the south is Highland Avenue this is the only source of noise which is reduced by the common block wall '16) Indicate proposed removals and/orreplacements o/mature orscenrc trees N/A 17) Indicate any bodies of water (mcludrng domestic water supplies) into which the site drerns 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A for usage eshmates) For further clanficahon, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water Drstnct at 87-259j cwt. ~rrfir'~ a Resrdenhal (gaUday) Jot eak use (gaUday) b CommeroraUlnd (gaUday/ac) Peak use (gaUmrn/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method o/sewage disposal ^ Septic Tank X^ Sewer If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests If discharge to a sanitary sewage system rs proposed indicate expected daily sewage generehon (See Attachment A for usage eshmates) For furtherdanficahon, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water Drstnct at 987-2591 a Resrdenhal (gaUday) b Commeroral/Industnal (gaUday/ac) RESIDENTIAL p~pJECTS: 20) Numberolresrdenhalunrts 60 • Detached (militate range of parcel saes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size C wlurSol Construdionl9866ffighland Avenue, Rancho CucamongBlC~rtybcRancho Cucamonga Enviommentai Information Fonn docPage 5 of 10 Rev 3I17I04 Attached (indicate whetherunrts are rental or for sale units) 21) Anhapated range of sale pnces and/or rants Sate Pnce(s) $320.000 to $370.000 Rent (per month) $1.000 to $1.350 22) Specify number ofbedrooms by and type Unlt A 3 Bedroom 2 5 Bath Unlt B 2 Bedroom, 2 Bath Und C 2 Bedroom, 1 '/. Bath Unlt D 2 Bedroom, 2 Y: Bath 23) lnd~cate anhc~pated household srze by unit type 2-4 per dwelllng • 24) Indicate the expected numbero(school chrldrnn who wdl be resrdmg within the pm/ect Contact the appmpnate School D~stncts as shown rn Attachment B a Elementary b Junior High c SenrorH~gh ,I ~~j,~n /JON//) ~1 n COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL. AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type of use(s) and ma/or function(s) of commercial, mdustnal or mshtuhonal uses 26) Total floor area of commercial, mdustnal, orrnshtut~onal uses by type nue 27) Indicate hours of operation C NAurSol ConstruGion\g666 Hghland Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga\Cny of Rancho Cucamonga Enwommental Infortnaoon Fonn docPage 6 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 . 28) Number of employees Total Maxrmum ShrR Time of Maxrmum ShrR 29) Prowde breakdown of anhcrpated/ob classrficahons, rncludrng wage and salary ranges, as well as an rndreation of the rate of hrro for each classrficat~on (attach add~honal sheet rf necessary) 30) Eshmahon o(the number of workers to be hued that cum3ndy reside rn the City '31) Forcommeroral and rndustnal uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount ofarrpolluhon emissions (Data should be venfied through the South Coast Arr Quality Management Drstnct, at (818) 572-6283) N/A ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agenaes serving the pro/ect been contacted to determine them abrl~ty to provide adequate service to the proposed pro/ect~ if so, please rnd~cate them response Yes Exlstin 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals Examples ofhazardous and/ortoxrc matenals include, but are notlimrted to PCB's, rad~oachve substances, peshcrdes and herbrcrdes,fuels,orls,solvents, andotherflammablel~qurdsandgases Also note underground storageofanyoftheabove Please Irst the matenals and descnbe them use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, rt known None No significant nwsances or hazard specific to the subject site C Whir-Sol Construdron\9866 Hghland Avenue, Rancho Cucamong~~ fl2ancho Cucamonga Envrommental Infonnahon Forth docPage 7 of 10 Rev 3117/04 • 34) WII the proposed pro/ect involve the temporary orlongterm use, storage, ord~scharge of hazardous and/ortowc matenals, mdudmg but not limited to those examples listed above if yes, previde an inventory of all such matenals to be used and proposed method ofdisposal The location o/such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on th~ppl~c~o~ns ~jJ~ ~~ l hereby certify that the statements /umished above and rn the a ched exhr s present the data and rn ahon req for adequate evaluahon of thrspro/ect to the best of my abrhty, that the cts, state nts, and mformafron presen are hue ~ correct tot he best o/my knowledge and belief 1 fuRher understand that dd/honal rM rmabon may be raqur d t sub rtt fore an adequate evaluation c(an be made by the City of Rancho Cucam nga / Date ~ ~ `~ ~~ Signature / aria C \DOCUmenLS and SelttngsWeather Artura\Loeal Settings\Temporary Inte~Fl ~WLKAVnitial Study Partt doc Page 8 of 10 Rev 3/17/od ATTACHMENT "A" • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usape Single-Family Multt-Family Neighborhood Commerctal General Commerctal Office Professtonal I nstttuttonal/Government Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (distribution) Sewer Flows Single-Family • Multl-Famlly General Commerctal Office Professtonal Industrtal Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrtal (dtstnbutton) 705 gallons per EDU per day 256 gallons per EDU per day 1000 gal/day/unit (tenant) 4082 gal/day/unit (tenant) 973 gal/day/urnt (tenant) 6412 gal/day/unit (tenant) 1750 gal/day/unit (tenant) 2020 gaf/day/unit (tenant) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) 270 gallons per EDU per day 190 gallons per EDU per day 1900 gal/day/acre 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government 3000 gal/day/acre 2020 gal/day/acre 1863 gal/day/acre Source Cucamonga Valley Water plstnct Engmeenng & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 C WlurSol ConstruGionl9866 Highland Avenue, Rancho CucamongalGay of Rancho Cucamonga Enviommental Intonnation Form docPage 9 of 10 Rev 3117104 e ATTACHMENT B • Contact the school dlstnct for your area for amount and payment of school fees • Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Llne Road, Swte F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Swte 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-8942 Etrvvanda 6061 East Avenue P O Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 High School Chaffey Hlgh School • 211 West 5th Street Ontano, CA 91762 (909)988-8511 C WlurSol Construdion~9866 Highland Avenue, Rancho Cu Rev n~a ~CTy o~ancho Cucamonga Enviommenlal Infonnahon Forth docPage 10 of 10 • • lopot,one- ine wens iupuyia}diu~ivia}~ s • _ _a_ _ __ . l ~ n i f; fYtllk lK - II=~_t•'• ~'' ~ 1 ~~~~~~ ~ ~}~ RE t•AkUI\O (~pym~Q 1$9~3AYpi 1 ~ I n l Q " -_'` - ~.~ Y.WII I ..Yr£ ,~ '~'1 ~ cI~A~V+ >'P. -°1(fn41[ ~JFL ~ 844 ' ~.r (~f ~ , " "' ~~ t~ ~~ ~ .~f ~ ~ _ J' Jr ~ ~ : I ... 4' S V - •w.. • .. = ~ • ~ T i ~ ~..._ i I r _ _~ ~. _ ! ~ ~ v. t - " -T _ _ ~_ ~ ~ __ _ . a.. ~ y J ~ 8 ~ i, -' "_ _ „ y i "- -`LL _. ,..- ri ~ u • .. M •3~r r. l _ ~ v - I Ir - ~ `I/`•~~ /~~, J >,... !T i I - ~1U lnvN~ I - lrl'elund 'AIR Lmuo ~•y~. 15 De ' _ - ' a~ ~ ° .~.+ r` -_ _~ -" _. - r ' • r F .~ ,.. ti, ~.T ~ ~~u r '~- I ~ ~~ ~ ~ n-f vI :' ~~ -~ EM ~ ~ ; K 'M'me / ~^y 9 ^ i ~ .1; ' . rn... } ,. I r .., ~ a _ -_ r~ ~_..., -- . a .n.eRANCA~` '} n ruca~ioxc~ - ,- I 0 a', -'~- * M 0 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4 ~ Km ['I J p 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2 m>. ~IJVf/ Map center Is UTM 11 445579E 3777449N (WG584/NAD83) CUCAMONGA PEAK quadrangle M=13.424 Pro~ectlon Is UTM Zone 11 NAD83 Datum 6=-0.331 ~~ httn //w~arw tnmm~ne cnm/nnnt acn~Tl 1 &n=3777449 00008501&e=445578.999999995&.. 1/12/2006 9866-9940 Highlan~enue, Rancho Cucamonga Outside Pictures 4, ~ ~ ~ ~~ IL lZ~ti I ,~ f N ` ~` • a' ~~-~. ~ ~ ~ ~a~~.r.. Westerly Outside Picture Northerly Outside Picture t3aa Easterly Outside Picture Southerly Outside Picture • 9866-9940 Hr~and Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga Interior Pictures C'~?3 Easterly Intenor Picture Northerly Intenor Picture Southerly Intenor Picture Westerly Interior Picture City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM '- ~ INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Prolect File Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17745 2. Related Files: None 3. Description of Protect: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP - SUBTT17745 - JASEN GROHS -Tract Map to convert 60 existing residential apartment units to 60 residential condominiums on 5 72 acres of land in the Medium Residential Distract (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located at 9866 through 9940 Highland Avenue APN 0201-395-01 thru 15 4. Protect Sponsor's Name and Address: Jasen Grohs 119E St Joseph Street Arcadia, California 91007 5. General Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential 6. Zoning: Residential Medum Density (8-14 du/ac) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting. The site is an existing multiple-family residential apartment complex located on the north side of Highland Avenue, midway between Archibald Avenue and Hermosa Avenue Currently, the protect area contains 15 four-unit bwldings The entrance for the complex ~s located off of Highland Avenue Development to the north, west, and east is single-family and multiple-family residential Interstate 210 is located to the south The protect site is currently zoned for Medium Density Residential uses with the surrounding area zoned both Low-Medium and Low Density Residential which includes multiple-family and single-family uses The protect would be in conformance according to the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact Person and Phone Number: Vance Pomeroy, Contract Planner (909) 477-2750 C J 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement)• None CJo+~ Initial Study for Tentative Tract Mao SUBTT17745 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o-Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a °Potentially Significant Impact,° °Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or °Less-Than-Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages Aesthetics Biological Resources Hazards & Hazardous Materials Mineral Resources Public Services Utilities/Service Systems ()Agricultural Resources ()Cultural Resources () Hydrology/Water Quality ()Energy and Mineral Resources ONoise ()Recreation r ~ Mandatory Findings of Siondica O Au Quality ()Geology/Sods ()Land Use/Planning ()Population/Housing () Transportat,oNTraffic DETERMINATION On the basis of this in,tial evaluation: (~) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NE( Prepared By Reviewed By ~,~~~ Date /~ig-o ~ Date ~~ • L..6..1 CI„rl.. fns City of Rancho Cucamonga ~,,,,,u, .,,...., ,,,, Pa e 3 Tentative Tract Ma SUBTT17745 Less man Sigraficanl Lars Polenhally Wnh Then Issues and Supporting Information Sources s~gnfi=anl Mmgaaon S,greM1=enr "° I n Iroo rateC I I an EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the protect a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas () () () (~) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but O O U (~) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (~) quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (~) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments• a) There are no significant vistas within or adtacent to the protect site The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 b) The protect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The site is located on the north side of Highland Avenue east of Archibald Avenue and is characterized by the existing multiple-family and single-family residential development to the north, east and west Interstate 210 is to the south The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this protect because no construction is proposed d) Because the protect is already built, the proposed conversion to condominiums would not increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity The impact is not considered significant 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the protect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland () () () (~) of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Williamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, () () () (/) due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments: a-c) The proposed subdivision will not affect agricultural resources because the site is fully developed ,~a ~ t.-..._I 0.. ..J.. {... City of Rancho Cucamonga n nual .~wuy w, Pa e4 Tentative Tract Ma SUBTT17745 Les, men Sipruficem Lela Potent,ellY WM Tllsn Issues and Supporting Information Sources $,pnificent M,Op90on Sipnlfitent No I Imo lee I act I ct 3. AIR DUALITY. Would the protect a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable () () () (/) air quality plan b) Violate any air quallty standard or contribute substantially () () () (/) to an existing or protected air quallty violation c) Result In a cumulatively considerable net Increase of any () () () (/) criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non- attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quallty standard (Including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () () () (/) concentrations e) Create obtectionable odors affecting a substantial number () () () (/) of people Comments: a-e) The proposed subdivision will not affect air quallty because the site Is fully developed 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the protect () () () (/) a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species In local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Flsh and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or () () () (/) other sensitive natural community Identified In local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Flsh and Game or US Flsh and WIIdIIfe Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected () () () (/) wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (Including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological Interruption, or other means d) Intertere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with stablished native resident or migratory wlldllfe corridors, e or Impede the use of native wlldllfe nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting () () () (/) biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan J r~ LJ r~a~ City of Rancho Cucamonga i Inmal stuay ror Tentative Tract Ma SUBTT17745 - Pa e 5 less Then ~~fi~, ~~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources Fote~oal~v sl~ncam wnn ~o~~ ~ man sopfi~^~ ~ "~ Comments• a-f) The proposed subdivision will not affect biological resources because the site is fully developed The prolect site is located at an existing multiple-family residential development which will not be significantly altered by the conversion to condominiums CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the prolect 5 . a) Cause a substantial adverse change m the significance () () () (~) of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () () () (~) of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () () () (~) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (~) outside of formal cemetenes~ Comments: a-d) developed sThesp odject (site slilocated atan exist ng multiple fambily es dent al development which will not be significantly altered by the conversion to condominiums. i • 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the prolect a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving () () (~) i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated () on the most recent Algwst-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Dmsion of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shakmg~ O O O ( ) nQ Seismic-related ground failure, including O O O (~) liquefaction O O O ( ro) Landshdes~ b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () () () (~) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or () () () (~) that would become unstable as a result of the prolect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) ee located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B () () () (~) of the Uniform Bwlding Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of O O O (~) septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste wA}P.f7 V_' / City of Rancho Cucamonga rnuai ~wuy w' Pa e 6 tentative Tract Ma SUBTT17745 Less Than Siprvficent Leu PNenhallY Wnft Th~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources S,grvficant ~o ~~ apni~ I Nom Comments• a-e) The proposed subdivision will not affect geology or soils because the site is fully developed No known faults pass through the site, and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is R in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5 1 of the General Plan FEIR 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the prolect a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sties compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a prolect located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles () () () (/) of a public airport or public use airport, would the prolect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the prolect area f) For a prolect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would () () () (/) the prolect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the prolect area g) Impair implementation of or physically mterfere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (/) injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildiands~ Comments: a-h) The proposed subdivision will not have any impact in hazards or waste materials because the site is fully developed The prolect site is located at an existing multiple-family residential development which will not be significantly altered by the conversion to condominiums 6. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the prolect a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () () () (/) requirements • ~~~ • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Tentative l ract ma auc i ~ ~ r rv~ Less man Siprvficant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources PptenUalty 9pni scant WM InMen ~o~ TTan ~9rv e~n~ ' New b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or intertere () () () (~) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there ld be a net deficit in agwfer volume or a lowering of wou the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (~) including through the alteration of the course of a r area , o stream or aver, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (~) including through the alteration of the course of a or area , stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or t of surface runoff in a manner which would result amoun in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the () () () (~) capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () () () (~) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (~) ed on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood mapp Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (~) which would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant nsk of loss, () () () (~) intury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp t) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ O O U (~) Comments: a-~) The proposed subdivision wtll not have any impact in hydrology or water quality because the site is fully developed The protect site is located at an existing multiple-family residential development which will not be significantly altered by the conversion to condominiums u LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project 9 . a) Physically divide an established community () () () (~) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (~) regulation of an agency with turisdiction over the protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an envvonmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or () () () (~) natural community conservation plan ~~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Pa e 8 Tentative Tract Ma SUBTT17745 Lass Than Significant Less Potentially Wrth Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources siBni6cam Mnigaaon signibcan. N~ imeact IncorDO2te0 Comments: a-c) fully pdeve opedubThe' pro e'otn sitea is aocated at eanr elx sting 'mu t ple-fam lye residential development which wdl not be significantly altered by the conversion to condominiums The proposed conversion to condominiums would increase the supply of affordable ownership units within the City consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan Housing Element 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project a) Result m the loss of avadabdity of a known mineral O U O (~) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the States ~ b) Result m the loss of availability of a locally important () () () ( ) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments: a) fully deve~oped The stenswnot designatedyals a State Aggaegate Resources Area a co ding to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) fully deve~oped The sitenis nlot des gnated by he Generral PIan9F gureclV tcand Table IIV-1S as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact Comments _. J ~~a b.d...l Cis „-i., fnr City of Rancho Cucamonga .. ~„~a, .,,,.,., ,,,, Pa e 9 Tentative Tract Ma SUBTT17745 Less man Sipmficam Lass ~I Potanaelly Wigs Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Miagaaon Significant No I att Inco rete0 I aR I a-f) The proposed subdivision will not have any noise impact because the site is fully developed The protect site is located at an existing multiple-family residential development which will not be significantly altered by the conversion to condominiums 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the protect a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (/) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the () () () (/) construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments• a-c) The proposed subdivision will not have any land use or planning impact because the site is fully developed The protect site is located at an existing multiple-family residential development which wilt not be significantly altered by the conversion to condominiums The proposed conversion to condominiums would increase the supply of affordable ownership units within the City consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan Housing Element The existing renters have been previously notified and given an opportunity to purchase their unit The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17 22 060 establishes an annual limit "of no more than one-half the number of multi-family rental dwelling units added to the City's housing stock during the preceding year" (2005) In 2005, the Cdy issued Building Permits for 338 multi-family rental units The maximum number of units that may be converted to condominiums would be 169 units (338 by 50 percent). The proposed subdivision would convert 60 units, well within the maximum allowed Therefore, the proposed subdivision would not displace substantial numbers of the existing housing or residents necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the protect result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facildies, need for new or physically altered govemmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance obfectives for any of the public services a) Fire protections O O O (/) b) Police protections O O O (/) c) Schools () () () (/) d) Parks O O O (/) e) Other public facilihes~ O O O (/) Comments a-e) The proposed subdivision will not have any public service impact because the site is fully developed The protect site is located at an existing multiple-family residential development which will not be significantly altered by the conversion to condominiums ,(333 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17745 Issues and Supporting Information Sources City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 10 Lass Than S~gntl¢am Lass Potanaally WM Than Significant Miagahon Significant No 14. RECREATION Would the prolect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regwnal O O O ( ) arks or other recreational facilities such that substantial p physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the prolect include recreational facilities or requve () () () (/) the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment Comments• a-b) The proposed subdiwsion will not have any recreation impact because the site is fully developed. The prolect site is located at an existing multiple-family residential development which will not be s~gmficantly altered by the conversion to condominwms 15. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC. Would the prolect a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e , result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle taps, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) () () () (/) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either () () () (/) an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm egwpment)~ e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capaclty~ O O O (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments: a-g) The proposed subdivision will not have any transportation impact because the site is fully developed The prolect site is located at an existing multiple-family residential development which wdl not be significantly altered by the conversion to condominwms • C `~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga rantarive Tract Mao SUBTT17745 Page 11 • Less Tien Sipnfipant Lass PMenUally Wrtfi Tfiert Issues and Supporting Information Sources s;oryfi~m MNpaom sipnificem No -- ..,..A,a ~,..,~, i~ 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the protect a) Exceed wastewater treatment regwrements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water () () () (/) drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects ~ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to () () () (/) accommodate the protect's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste Comments• a-g) The proposed subdmsion will not have any utility or service systems impact because the site is fully developed The protect site is located at an existing multiple-family residential development which will not be significantly altered by the conversion to condominiums 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality () () () (/) of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually () () () (/) hmded, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) c) Does the protect have environmental effects which will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either duectiy or ind~rectly~ Comments• ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Ma SUBTT17745 Pa e 12 Lars Than • sivnihcent Lass Potentially WiN Tha^ Issues and Supporting Information Sources sivnihtant M^t~vahon s~v~h~an+ N~ ..-. .r mnm,an Irmact Irtpael a-c) The proposed subdivision will not have any impact because the site is fully developed The protect site is located at an existing multiple-family residential development which will not be significantly altered by the conversion to condominwms EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program Environmental Impact Report (EIR), or other California Enwronmental Quality Act (CEQA) process, one or more effects The effectsdidentf eld analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are avatlabie for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Dnve (check all that apply) (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) • P} 2 (.!~ u City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration ~s being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Oualrty Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project Fde No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17745 Public Review Period Closes: February 22, 2006 Project Name: Project Applicant: Jasen Grohs Project Location (also see attached map): Located at 9866 through 9940 Highland Avenue APN 0201-395-01 thru 15 Project Description: Tract map to convert 60 existing residential apartment units to 60 residential condominiums on 5 72 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an • Initial Study to determine if the protect may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study indicates that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be regwred. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477- 2847. NOTICE The public is mulled to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration dunng the review period. February 22 2006 Date of Determination Adopted By ~~ . RESOLUTION NO 06-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17745, A SUBDIVISION CONVERTING 60 EXISTING RESIDENTIAL RENTAL UNITS INTO 60 CONDOMINIUMS ON 16 LOTS ON 5 72 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT 9866THROUGH 9940 HIGHLAND AVENUE - APN 0201-395-01 THROUGH -15, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals 1 Jasen Grohs filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17745, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subtect Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 22nd day of February 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3 All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred • B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that ali of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 22, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application applies to the property located at 9866 - 9940 Highland Avenue, with a street frontage of 155 feet and lot depth of 1,600 feet, and is presently improved with 60 residential rental units, and b The property to the north of the subtect site issingle-family residential and vacant land, the property to the south consists of the I-210 Freeway, the property to the east is a church, and the property to the west is single-family residential, and c The conversion of the existing rental units to condominiums will not result m any significant proposed exterior changes, and d All parking and circulation regwrements are met, and • e The protect and regwred physical elements report, bwlding history report, and other testing and survey reports have been reviewed by City departments and found to be m compliance with the property development standards of the Development Code. To wit the following reports, U~JS RESOLUTION NO 06-10 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17745, A SUBDIVISION CONVERTING 60 EXISTING RESIDENTIAL RENTAL UNITS INTO 60 CONDOMINIUMS ON 16 LOTS ON 5 72 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT 9866THROUGH 9940 HIGHLAND AVENUE - APN 0201-395-01 THROUGH -15, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A Recitals 1 Jasen Grohs filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17745, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subfect Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 22nd day of February 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B Resolution . NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public heanng on February 22, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to the property located at 9866 - 9940 Highland Avenue, with a street frontage of 155 feet and lot depth of 1,600 feet, and is presently improved with 60 residential rental units, and b The property to the north of the subfect site issingle-family residential and vacant land, the property to the south consists of the I-210 Freeway, the property to the east is a church, and the property to the west is single-family residential, and c The conversion of the existing rental units to condominiums will not result in any significant proposed exterior changes, and d All parking and circulation requirements are met, and e The protect and regwred physical elements report, bwlding history report, and other . testing and survey reports have been reviewed by City departments and found to be in compliance with the property development standards of the Development Code To wit the following reports, [./J / PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-10 SUBTT17745 - JASEN GROHS February 22, 2006 • Page 2 test and surveys were prepared and reviewed, and copies of which are on file with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Energy Efficiency Regulations (Title 24) Report by Perfect Design & Engineering Inc ,Acoustical Control and Sound Transmission Report by Gordon Bracken & Associates, Structural Pest Control Report by Eastern Pest Control & Termite, Property Condition report by Land America Assessment Corporation, and f No new buildings or exterior modifications are proposed Consequently, the only plan needing review is the proposed Tentative Tract Map, and g All noticing requirements for condominium conversions in the Subdivision Map Act have been fulfilled On July 1, 2005, the existing renters were notified by the owner, via certified mail, and given an opportunity to purchase their unit, and h The proposed subdivision would convert 60 units; therefore, the proposed subdivision would not displace substantial numbers of the existing housing or residents necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows. a That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and b The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable mtury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and The tentative tract is not likely to cause serous public health problems, and f The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acgwred bythe public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision, and g The proposal is compatible with the obtective, policies, elements, and program specified in the General Plan, and The design or improvement of the protect is consistent with applicable General Plan, and i The proposal is consistent with the purposes of Rancho Cucamonga Muniapal Code, Title 17 Development Code, Chapter 17 22, and • t The proposal promotes the health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the City B ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-10 SUBTT17745 - JASEN GROHS February 22, 2006 Page 3 • 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained m said Negative Declaration with regard to the application b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed protect, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set • forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Plannin 1) Tenant's Wahl to purchase As provided in Government Code Section 66427 1(b), any present tenant or tenants of any unit shall be given a nontransferable right of first refusal to purchase the unit occupied at a pace no greater than the pace offered to the general public. The right of first refusal shall extend for at least 60 days from the date of issuance of the subdivision public report or commencement of sales, whichever date is later 2) Vacation of units Each non-purchasing tenant, not in default underthe obligations of the rental agreement or lease under which he occupies his unit, shall have not less than 120 days from the date of receipt of notification from the owner of his intent to convert or from the filing date of the final subdivision map, whichever date is later, to find substitute housing and to relocate. 3) Illuminated addresses and, if found necessary by the Planning • Commission, directory maps for all units shall be prominently displayed from appropriate public or private access within or adtacent to the protect C~, ~/ UT~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-10 SUBTT17745 - JASEN GROHS February 22, 2006 • Page 4 4) The applicant shall provide written certification to the buyer of each unit on the initial sale after conversion that any dishwashers, garbage disposals, stoves, refrigerators, hot water tanks, and air conditioners that are provided are in working condition as of the close of escrow At such time as the homeowners' association takes over management of the development, the applicant shall provide wntten certification to the association that any pool and pool equipment and any appliances and mechanical equipment to be owned in common by the assoaation is in working condition 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY • ATTEST Pam Stewart, Chairman Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of February 2006, by the following vote-to-wiY AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS ~J ,~ ~a STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17745 SUBJECT: CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION OF 60 RESIDENTIAL UNITS APPLICANT: JASEN GROHS LOCATION: 9866 - 9940 HIGHLAND AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Completion Date A. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Ctty, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or for an es l y , oye emp employees maybe regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition B. Time Limits 7 This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning _/_/_ Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include -/-/- site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions ~_/- of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner • 1 tCJ 7~ Project No SUBTT17745 Completion Date 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be . submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bwlding permit issuance 7 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of bulding permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 8 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and Cary Engineer revew and approved prior to the issuance of bulding permits .APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • _/-~. -~-~- ~_~ -~-~- ~~- -~-~- 2 ~~~ Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Building & Safety STANDARD CONDITIONS October 26, 2005 G-Apex LLC 9866 I3ighland Ave Multifamily Condotriimum Conversion SUBTT17745 Building & Safety has reviewed your plans subxtittted for a Tentative Tract Review for condottiimiim purposes Thts pxolect review was based on the plans submitted which reflect an occupancy type R-1 /V-1, construction type V-N or V-1 hour, with the total square footage unknown Please comply with the following Standard Conditions. Plans and spectficanons in accordance The Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Standazds section 17 22 040 must be subtmtted to the B&S Division for review of the following issues a T-24 Energy Regulations calculations and proposed alterations b Sound control study and proposed alterations c Cahforma Housing Accessibility analysts for compliance proposed changes d Elecmcal changes regarding smoke detectors upgrades, elecmcal meters and shutoff specifics e Plumbing changes such as water and gas shut-off f Illuminated addresses and directory proposals g Storage space specifics h Laundry facilities locations t CC&RS with reciprocal agreements for Fire Dismct Access and Ftre Protection water supply All submittals to Building and Safety must include (5) sets of plans and (2) sets of spectficanons or calculations The speafics of the buildings on this protect, such as occupanry, squaze footage, height, number of stones and type of construction were not found on the plans Building & Safety requires this infontiaaon to provide the applicant with a complete review and applicable comments Please provide the necessary building data on your subitttal to Building & Safety fox the proposed condoiniruum conversion A Registered Architect must sign & stamp all the plans ~~ • ~~`S Page 1 of 1 October 26, 2005 G-Apex LLC 9866 Highland Ave Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS Multifamily Condominium Conversion SUBTT 17745 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply (Existiug must be maintained) FSC-2 Fire Flow (Existing must be maintained) FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems (Existing must be maintaiued) FSC-5 Fire Alarm System (Existing must be maintained) SC-6 Fire District Site Access (Existing must be maintained as shown below) ire D~stnct access roadways include public roads, streets and lughways, as well as pnvate roads, streets dnve aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lanes Standazd #9-7. 1 Location of Access All portions of the structures 1~` story extenor wall shall be located w~thm 150-feet of Fire Distnct vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the extenor of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes m elevation, gates and fences aze deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The maximum ms~de fain radms shall be 20-feet c. The minimum outside fain radms shall be 46-feet d The mm~mum radius for cal-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance ~s 14-feet, 6-inches f. At any pnvate entry median, the mm~mum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the dnvmg surface shall not exceed 12%. i. Support a mm~mum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) ~ Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept tnmmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6- mches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Ftre Department appaza[us 3 Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided m accordance with the 2001 Cahfomia Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standazds 4 Access Walkways Handscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to . all required building extenor openings a 5 Residential gates installed across Fire D~stnct access roads shall be installed m accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1 The following design requirements apply ~~ b Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates m service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS c Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inwazd • d Gates maybe motonzed or manual e When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet f Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20 00 g Motonzed gates must open at the rate ofone-foot per second h The motonzed gate actuation mechanism must be egmpped with a manual ovemde device and afail- safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism m case of power failure or mechanical malfunction i Motonzed gates shall be equipped with a I{nox ovemde key switch The switch must be installed outside the gate m a visible and unobstructed location ~. For motonzed gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief pnor to installation Bi-directional or multiple sensors maybe required due to complexity of the vanous entry configurations 6 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standazds shall be included m the archttectural plans submitted to B&S for approval FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed aze those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required pnor to pennrt issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any activtty or operation not specifically described below, which m the Iudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce • conditions that maybe hazadous to life or property Compressed Gases Public Assembly Flammable and Combustible Ligwds Hazardous Materials Tents, Canopies and/or ?.ir Supported Structures Liquefied Petroleum Gases FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Coustructiou Services Plans shall be submitted and approved pnor to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazazdous materials m accordance with the 2001 California Building, Frre, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Mazshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted,on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee FCS-14 Map Recordation RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are requrred on this project The project appeazs to be located on a property that is being subdivided A reciprocal agreement is requrred to be recorded between property owners Reciprocal access agreement -Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners grantrn~ irrevocable and anon-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gam access to the subject property The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery tq the property by the fire District 2 ,(~ ~~ Reciprocal water covenant -Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners ganting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favonng the Fire Distnct for the purpose of . accessing and maintaining the pnvate water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities rn general) The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire Distnct The ageement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernazdino Recorders Office The Fire Constrnction Services Umt shall approve the ageement pnor to recordation The recorded ageement shall include a copy of the site plan The ageement shall be recorded with the County of San Bemazdmo, Recorders Office The Fue Construction Services Umt shall approve the agreement, pnor to recordation FCS-16 Posting of Addresses The address of the units, the designation of the buildings, the site address monument and the site directory must be posted as dictated by the fire inspector i ~ ~~ T H E C I T Y O F R A N C ti 0 C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE February 22, 2006 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM. Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner gy. Candyce Burnett, Assoaate Planner SUBJECT PUBLIC SLOPING FOR SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT RT HE NO N A 4 DR O D PLAN SPEC FIC ETIWANDA NORTH 2004 O1P g) DRC ZONE AMENDMENT (DRC2006-00041) - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An opportunity to give public testimony pertaining to the environmental issues to be addressed in a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to the General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report (State Clearing House No 2000061027, th t • e o certified October 17, 2001) for approximately 4,115 acres to be annexed in ' s the pre-zoning of approximately 685 acres to be in conformance with the City City , Development Code and zoning regulations and an Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment (ENSP) to amend approximately 508 acres within the ENSP area (110 68 acres rezoned from Flood Zone to Resource Conservation, 242 72 acres rezoned from Hillside Residential to Resource Conservation; and, 154.74 acres rezoned from Flood Control to Resource Conservation), located in the northern Etiwanda Area of unincorporated San Bernardino County, generally north of State Highway 210, and generally west of Haven Avenue to the eastern boundary of the City of Fontana in the City's Sphere-of-Influence - APN 0201-03-209, 250, 273, 282-285, 0201-28-102, 104-110, 113-114, 116-122, 0225-05-101, 104, 278-279 , 117-120, 122-123, 125-134, 136-137, 0225-06-102, 105-106, 108-111, 115 107 , , 121-122, 125-127, 129-130, 133, 0225-07-101-116, 120, 0225-09-105-06, 115-117 , 201, 0226-06-103, 107, 116, 120, 126-128, 133, 147-148, 156-157, 161-174, 0226- 08-208, 0219-221, 230. PURPOSE The purpose of the public scoping meeting is to allow the general public an opportunity to comment on the scope of what should be covered in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed protect and to all proposed actions related to the protect Based on the location of the protect site, the City determined that the proposed protect could have significant effects on the environment, therefore, a Supplemental EIR is being prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) The Notice of Preparation (NOP) of an EIR was mailed on January 26, 2006, and the public comment penod was noted as beginning on January 26, 2006, • and ending February 27, 2006 (Exhibit A) PROJECT DESCRIPTION• The proposed protect referred to as "North Eastern Sphere Annexation" consists of an annexation of approximately 4,115 acres of land, generally located north of the City boundary between Haven Avenue and the City of Fontana border Currently, the ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-01204, DRC2004-01208, AND DRC2006-00041 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 22, 2006 • Page 2 matority of the protect site is designated as Flood Control and Public Utilities Land on the City's General Plan and pre-zoned by the Et~wanda North Specific Plan as Flood Control, Resource Conservation, and Hillside Residential In addition, there is no City zoning designation for 680 acres of the site, generally located between Haven Avenue extending approximately 6,430 feet easterly, which the City is proposing to designate to Flood ControUUtility Corridor (390 acres), Open Space (268 acres), and Hillside Residential (21 acres) No development is proposed as part of this protect BACKGROUND AND PROJECT STATUS On August 17, 2005, the City Counal approved the request to execute the Professional Services Agreement with Michael Brandman Assocates and to authorize the appropriation of funds for costs associated with the proposed annexation In compliance with the EIR preparation process as outlined in CEQA, the EIR consultant, Michael Brandman Associates prepared the NOP. The NOP serves as the public notification that an EIR is being prepared and requests comment and input from responsible agencies and other interested parties regarding environmental issues are to be addressed in the document. In addition to the NOP, CEQA recommends conducting a scoping meeting for the purposes of identifying the range of potential significant impacts that should be analyzed within the scope of the Draft EIR. CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, notices were mailed to all responsible and trustee . agencies, and to all property owners within the sphere-of-influence for the protect area A total of 43 notices were mailed to property owners on February 9, 2006 (Exhibit B). RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission accept public testimony pertaining to the environmental issues to be addressed in the EIR being prepared for the North Eastern Sphere Annexation and the related applications Dan oleman Acting City Planner DC:CB/ge Attachments Exhibit A -Notice of Preparation Exhibit B -Notice of Public Hearing t. J ca City of Rancho Cucamonga ' Notice of Preparation of a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Date: January 23, 2006 To: Responsible and Trustee Agents/Interested Organizations and Individuals Subject: Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the North Eastern Sphere Annexation Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (DRC 2004-01204), Pre Zone (DRC 2004-01208), and Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment (DRC2006-00041). Lead Agency: Consulting Firm: Agency Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Firm Name Michael Brandman Associates Street Address P O. Box 807 Street Address 621 E. Carnegie Dnve, Swte 100 Gty/State/Zip Rancho Cucamonga CA 91729 City/State/Zip San Bernardino, CA 92408 Contact Candyce Burnett Assoaate Planner Conrad Kent Norton AICP REA 909 477.2750 909.884.2255 The City of Rancho Cucamonga (Qty) will be the Lead Agency and, pursuant to the California • Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), will prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to the General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report (State Clearing House No 2000061027, certified October 17, 2001) for the protect identified below. We need to know the views of your agency as to the scope and content of this Supplemental EIR germane to your agency's statutory responsibilities in connection with the proposed protect. Your agency may need to use this Supplemental EIR when considering permits or other approvals Due to the time limits mandated by State law, your response must be sent at the earliest possible date, but no later than 30 days after receipt of this notice. Please note that the NOP response period will be )anuary 24, 2006 through February 27, 2006. Please send your response to Candyce Burnett at the address shown above. We request that you include the name, mailing address and telephone number of a contact person in your agency in all correspondence. A Public Scoping Meeting regarding the proposed annexation will be held in conlunctlon with the regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting at 10500 Civic Center Drive on Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 7:00 pm. Project North Eastern Sphere Annexation, Pre-Zone and Etiwanda North Specific Plan Title Amendment The approximately 4,115 acre proJed site located in the northern Etiwanda Area of Project unincorporated San Bernardino County, generally north of State Highway 210, and Location generally west of Haven Avenue to the eastern boundary of the City of Fontana. Please refer to the attached ma The ro ect site is artiall within the Etiwanda EXHIBIT A C3 1 \PLANNING\Candyce\AnnexahonWOP 012306 doc Page 1 North Specific Plan and wholly within the City of Rancho Cucamonga sphere of influence The City of Rancho Cucamonga is the lead agency for the proposed North Eastern 5pnere • Annexation protect, and is responsible for conducting the specific environmental rewew under CEQA. CEQA Guidelines §15063 provides that if a lead agency determines that an EIR will clearly be regwred for a proled, as is the case for this protect, an Initial Study Is not regwred. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that a Supplemental EIR will be prepared based on the scale and potential complexity of the proposed proled. The Supplemental EIR will be prepared to evaluate the potential and probable impacts of the proposed proled. The EIR will be comprehensive in nature, evaluating all subject issues from the CEQA Initial Study Checklist. Project Description The protect consists of the annexation of approximately 4,115 acres from the Iurisdiction of the County of San Bernardino to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The proposed 4,115-acre annexation area is currently within the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan sphere of influence. Approximately 3,430 acres of the annexation area has been prezoned and would be subject to the land use and development standards of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan (ENSP) upon annexation. With the annexation as proposed, the ENSP will be amended and approximately 508 acres within the ENSP area will be rezoned to Resource Conservation (approximately 243 of those acres changing from Hillside Residential and the remaining from either Flood Control or Flood Zone land uses). The annexation area outside of the ENSP area (approximately 685 acres) will be subled to the Development Code and zoning regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Many of the associated environmental impacts of the annexation area have been previously evaluated in the General Plan Update EIR; therefore, only minor additions are necessary to make it applicable to the proposed probed. . LAFCO, the Local Agency Formation Commission for the County of San Bernardino, Is the trustee agency for the proposed change in City corporate boundaries, and they also facilitate and commission the corporate boundaries for all public service districts. In order for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to submit the proposed annexation to LAFCO, prezoning the land use designations for the entire annexation area is regwred. Furthermore, a Plan for Service, which explains pertinent information relating to governmental functions, facilities, services, and analyzes the fiscal impacts (cost and revenue) of each of those services as a result of the proposed annexation, must be provided to LAFCO and will be available to any other interested parties. Public service district boundary changes may be considered by the City, LAFCO and service agences, and may be implemented as a part of the annexation process in order to provide optimum service to the area. Currently, the annexation area is within the sphere of influence for the Cucamonga Valley Water District, Inland Empire UGIIUes Agency, and the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. The Urban Water Management Plans of these agencies well need to be evaluated to determine that they address the areas proposed for inclusion. Because LAFCO requires concurrent annexation to the community based districts in any city annexation, these distrld boundaries will be amended to include the annexation area. The areas not served by sewer maybe served by septic systems. The proled may requre other service district amendments which will be considered in the EIR, including but not limited to, the West Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Community Facilities District 88-1, the Etlwanda School District, the City-wide Arterial Street Ughting District, and the detachment from County Services Area 70 Improvement Zone OS-1 (CSA 70 OS-1). The probed may also require service . agreement amendments for solid waste disposal, and public parks and libraries. There are no I \PLANNING\CandyceWnnexat~onWOP 012306 doc Page 2 properties in the proposed annexation area that are listed on the Cortese list of hazardous waster sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. • Following are proposed actions related to the protect, which are the preliminary focus of the Supplemental EIR for the North Eastern Sphere Annexation: • Development District Amendment and pre-zone in conformance with the existing City General Plan for approximately 685 acres generally located north of City limits between Haven Avenue and 1,242 feet easterly of the planned Milliken Avenue extension alignment. o The Development District Amendment would be consistent with the current General Plan designations and would pre-zone the approximately 685 acres pursuant to the development standards set forth in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. o The proposed pre-zone would replace the County's Zoning Designations upon completion of the annexation proceedings. • Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment to allow the following land use changes• 110.68 acres rezoned from Flood Zone to Resource Conservation; 242.72 acres rezoned from Hillside Residential to Resource Conservation; and, 154.74 acres rezoned from Flood Control to Resource Conservation. • Annexation of approximately 4,115 acres of land (including approximately 3,430 acres previously pre-zoned with the Etiwanda North Specific Plan and approximately 685 acres from the current pre-zone request). The majority of the annexation area is currently vacant However, the Henderson Creek Channel traverses the protect site and there are a few residential units located at random within the eastern portion of the annexation area. Southern California Edison's overhead power transmission line easements are included within the site, and are currently in use as a utility corridor. The annexation area is currently subject to the West Foothills Planning Area under the County of San Bernardino General Plan. The table at the end of this notice prepared by Stanley R. Hoffman Associates shows the potential development with the proposed land uses of the annexation area. The Supplemental EIR will focus on the following potential or probable impacts: • Aesthetic • Agricultural resources • Air quality • Biological resources • Cultural resources • Hazards and hazardous materials • Hydrology/water quality • Geology and soils • Land use and planning • Noise • Population/housing • Public services • Utilities/service systems The Suppiemental EIR will address the short and long-term effects of the project on the environment It will also evaluate the potential for the project to cause direct and indirect growth- inducing impacts, as well as cumulative impacts. The EIR will evaluate alternatives to the proposed protect which reduce potentially significant protect impacts identified in the EIR The Supplemental EIR will identify feasible Mitigation Measures for those impacts that are determined to be significant. • The Supplemental EIR will identify levels of significance after mitigation for each significant environmental impact. A Mitigation Monitoring Program, if required, will be developed in accordance I \PLANNING\CandyceWnnexahonWOP 012306 doc Page 3 ~ G, with §15150 of the CEQA Guldellnes. Please contact Ms. Candyce Burnett at the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga or Kent Norton with Michael Brandman Associates for more Information. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION AFTER BUILDOUT t/~roC ~i-{ ~~ .~. Residential 146 17 188 Residential Estates 213 38 213 Total Residential 359.55 401 1 Flood Control 1,580 54 Fault Zone 118 28 Open Space 946 03 Resource Conservation 167 50 Utility Corridor 250 82 .,__~_ 8 57 Total Non-Residential 3,071.74 0 TOTAL DEVELOPMENT 3,431.29 401 1 Etlwanda North Preserve Total Annexation Areal 684 15 4,115.44 I1 Population is protected based on assumptions provided by January 1, 2005 estimates from the California Department of Finance average household size of 3 21 persons per household 2 This includes the acres from the Etiwanda North Preserve which are precluded from development (Sources Stanley R Hoffman Associates, Inc Califomia Department of Finance, January 1, 2005 • • • 1 \PI,ANNING\CandyceWnnexahon\NOP 012306 doc Page 4 n r ,~ / :~x Syr, ~~i>Y~/ ' /' .r>, -.. :. ~r , ti ..'a ~r 6~/ ,f /is,~~:, ~ t9i ~U.Tv'~ w.'.' .i~`,~. -'S_ _of TO SCALE • Imona ... ~Ontarb ~4,2< x ..;4.r.`a.•r:i%'_. P`I; :XJ.''S•f,..t~4T~t ~ ~'~`•' ~' t I YF 4 ~~ . ~ ,.. ~.~• . I i~1~~ ".'~~~„"~ :.Corona ~ A 1~~ } {I,' 4~ I I a V ~ t y, '.; - + ~ _ ~ _ `L`am is , a; • Fontana ~ -:, _ ,~-y_~}') Isy(}~'~'~, `r A ;~ja+ Lf / ~ )) ~~-~~~ J RlveisldT3 •z=_ 4 ~~,1 r; '> 'f ~ 1 ~I ~~~I~JI _"~ ~~/~/OOd ~l ~~='--ii jJy~, r W~1 ~ I /wi. .., )L BUIBW s¢.''• •/5~9~ rj - '^ C' ~''~ ~'+"4 `~ .m .~ y *~ 1 7i y .~ /, ~ ~ ~'' .~ r :s ._ f ""w.r.~:.~I_c. .°L ` .+ Y ' J i~; e.i vt p ' .•:a-. 11 -~ . . ~•, - f x~, • ~ ~~ p 5 25 0 5 ^~~^ i~ Miles ivUchael Brandman Assocates 00180030 • 01/2006 ~ 1_reglonal mxd Exhibit 1 Regional Location Map U I r ur rar~rv~.nv ~. •~ ~~~+^ NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION u C~ Source ESRI Streets Map USA Data antl Cary of Rancno Cucamonga ~~~~ ~ a,ooo z.ooo o a,ooo EXhlblt 2• nn~n g~j Feet Local Vicinity Map mxd CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CCF NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION T U C Y O ~t~NCHO CUC~MONG~ • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING COMMISSION WHEN IS MEETING? 7 00 P M on February 22, 2006 WHERE IS MEETING? Rancho Cucalmonga Civc Centelr, t th 1 ls m 1 e 2006, a February 22, on 7 p m hearing at Council Chambers, located at 10500 CIVIC Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730, to consider the following described pro)ect I 0 WHAT IS PROPOSED? RN SPHERE ANNEXATION PRE OR THE NORTH EASTE C2 04I 01204 ( EIR) DR ZONE (DRC 2004-01208), AND ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT (DRC2006-00041) - C ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An opportunity to give public testimony pertaining to the environmental Issues to be addressed in a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to the General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report (State Clearing House No 2000061027, certified October 17, 2001) for the pre-zoning of approximately to be annexed Into the City , approximately 4,115 acres 685 acres to be in conformance with the City's Development Code and zoning regulations and an Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment (ENSP) to amended approximately 508 acres within the ENSP area (110 68 acres rezoned from Flood Zone to Resource Conservation, 242 72 acres rezoned from Hillside Residential to Resource . Conservation, and, 154 74 acres rezoned from Flood Control to Resource Conservation) located in the northern Etiwanda Area of unincorporated San Bernardino County, generally north of State Highway 210, and generally west of Haven Avenue to of Fontana in the City's Sphere of Influence APN 201- f the Cit d y ary o the eastern boun 278-279, 282-285, 201-28-102, 104-110,113-114, 116-122, 225-05- 273 250 03-209 , , , 101, 104, 107, 115, 117-120, 122-123, 125-134, 136-137, 225-06-102, 105-106, 108- 121-122, 125-127, 129-130, 133, 225-07-101-116, 120, 225-09-105- 115-117 111 , , 06, 201, 226-06-103, 107, 116, 120, 126-128, 133, 147-148, 156-157, 161-174, 226- 08-208, 219-221, 230, 999999999, 999999999 INFORMATION The proposed plans and other Information can be reviewed at the City Planning AVAILABLE: Division. WHO TO CONTACT: Anyone having concerns or questions or wishing to review or comment on the pro)ect Division at (909) 477-2750 or visit the offices Plannin C t h g l y e is welcome to contact t located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Monday through Thursday from 7 a m to 6 p m The Planner most familiar with this proposal is Candyce Burnett WHAT CAN I DO? All interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing and express opinions for or against the proposal or may submit their concerns in writing to the City prior to said meeting Written comments should be addressed to the Planning Division, City of Rancho Cucamonga, P O Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 This is an opportunity to give public testimony only No action will be taken by the Planning Commission during this public hearing C EX H I B IT B pox 807 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 •(909) 477-2750 FAX (909) 477-2847 www c~ rancho-Cucamonga ca.us C°~ ' s C 1 T Y ~ F T H I~ANCKO CUCt~MONG1~ IF YOU CHALLENGE THE FOREGOING ACTION IN COURT, YOU MAY BE LIMITED TO RAISING ONLY THOSE ISSUES YOU OR SOMEONE ELSE RAISED AT TH~ PUBLIC HEARING FOR FINAL ACTION DESCRIBED IN THIS NOTICE, OR IN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE DELIVERED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AT, OR PRIOR TO, THE PUBLIC HEARING. DATE NOTICE MAILED• February 9, 2006 • 10500 Civic Cen[er Dnve • P O Box 807~Wac' raon ho--arcucamonga.cal s29 •(909) 477-2750 FAX (909) 477-2847 ~~o 22606157 INLAND REAL ESTATE GROUP LLC 1 LIME ORCHARD ~UNA NIGUEL, CA 92677 22506118 SANDOUIST,A/R SOLANO,RAMSEY & POTTER 120 E DEODAR ST ONTARIO, CA 91764 N 226ae16e, w FRED C NELSEN AND ASSOC 13209 RICHMOND WY APPLE VALLEY, CA 92308 T 22606172, 73, 74 MEI-HUA, KUO 15538 E GALE AVE HACIENDA HEIGHTS, CA 91745 to 22505118 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (USDA) 1824 S COMMERCENTER CIRCLE SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408 +3 67 LING YEN MOUNTAIN TEMPLE (CALIFORNIA 2934 E GARVEY AVE SOUTH #102 WEST COVINA CA91791 Ib 22506130 LUNING ASSOCIATES 3689 CHELAN BLVD MANSON, WA98831 14 zzsosloe WARM SPRINGS INVESTMENTS LTD 4100 NEWPORT PLACE STE 800 NEWPORT BEACH CA92660 as 22505194 GRANANDOS, JUAN C 5401 CARRIAGE PL RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 d5 O6 MIKE 6621 CANTERWOOD RD LA VERNE, CA 91750 ~e 22505132 CHANG, SHENG H 1140 SINGINGWOOD DR ARCADIA, CA 91006 2 22606127,20128110 BREDLAU REV FAMILY TRUST (10-18-99) 13040 PINION STREET ETNVANDA, CA91739 s 22606147, 48, 646 LING YEN MOUNTAIN TEMPLE (CALIFORNIA 14240 SAPPHIRE HILL LN CHINO HILLS, CA 97709 8 20128109 SHAW, LAWRENCE & JENNY TR 1705 N VALLEJO WY UPLAND, CA 91786 , 22606126,28 FRENCH TRUST (FBO HAROLD H/JACOUELIN 2319 BAYSIDE CT WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91361 14 z2so612z HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIFE INC 30 N RAMON STE 303 PASADENA, CA 91103 1~ 22505115, 17, 20, 21, 26' COUNTY SERVICE AREA 70 IMP ZONE OS-1 385 N ARROWHEAD AVE 5TH FL SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92415 a.o zz5os1os,17 CUNNINGHAM, ALEXANDER J 4686 EAST AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91739 ~3 z2soslm CLARK, JAMES W TR 6233 ETNVANDAAVE ETNVANDA, CA 91739 .i6 22505123 8OUTROS,ADEL 6641 SILENT HARBOR DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 as 22506115 CARSON, WILLIAM T TR 1155 S WANAMAKER AVE ONTARIO, CA 91761 8 22505122 BOUTROS,ADEL 13185 ORANGE CT CHINO, CA 91710 6 20128113,22608230 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 14799 CHESTNUT ST WESTMINSTER, CA 92683 5 22606116,62 ADR DEVELOPMENT INC 17953 SANTIAGO BLVD #107-287 V?LLA PARK, CA 92861 20103209.83 HU, BERNARD C R 2648 DURFEE AVE EL MONTE, CA 91732 i5 22508111,33 ALLIED CONSULTING 8 INVESTMENT INC 30806 COAST HIGHWAY LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92651 I$ 20103279 AZER FAMILY TRUST 11/20/03 4005 PENNSYLVANIA AVE LA CRESCENTIA, CA 91214 al zo1o3250 SIEGAL, JACK L TR 515 OCEAN AVENUE NPHA SANTA MONICA, CA 90402 a4 zolzelo6 LLEWELLYN, JOAN REVOCABLE TR 7- 8-02 645 W 20TH ST UPLAND, CA 91784 ~~ 2zso61oz JOHNSON, CECIL M TR 6901 N JONES BLVD LAS VEGAS, NV89131 ao ~~~ 20103285 22506108 20128119, 71 27, 29 22606163, 22608208, 20.21 22505107 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 22x°71ot °2-0s o7as, zo SAN BERNARDINO CO FLOOD CONTROL COUNTY SERVICE AREA 70 825 E THIRD ST RM 207 825 E THIRD ST 825 E THIRD ST SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92415 SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92415 SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92415 • 33 3~ 3~ 225061n 20128116 ANTHONY MARICIC 22606170,71 CORDEIRO, TONY RAMSEY, EARL R 9449 PALMETTO , p 0 BOX 1476 P O BOX 3 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 CA 92335 0NTANA ~ ~p,NA CA 92334 ~6 , 3 20128114 2621, 22so61o3 Ss, s1. 3s 22606120 ~ DEBORAH A WEBSTER 22606216 METRO WATER DISTlSO CALIF 22w5no, n, 29.31 33 CITY OF LOS ANGELES , P O BOX 53 p O BOX 54153 LOS ANGELES CA 90054 P O BOX 51111 ETNVANDA, CA 91739 a9 LOS ANGELES CA 90051 ~ a~ 2o1z61os-o7 2zso6126 HOWARD HARRELL POORE ETC 20103273 CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DIST WALDROP, MARK PTNSHP P O BOX 638 P O BOX 745 MOUNT BALDY CA 91759 p0 BOX 2009 UPLAND CA 91785 CUCAMONGA CA 91730 .ao 4 ~ 4~ 22505125 CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT PO BOX 638 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 • v3 ~~ a • • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP AGENDA (;RnrrfONGA FEBRUARY 22, 2006 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Chairman Stewart Vice Chairman Maaas Fletcher _ McNiel_ McPhail_ II. NEW BUSINESS A PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW - DRC2005-01035 -MICHAEL CHAT - A pre-application review of a proposed master-planned retail and office complex comprised of two 2-story office buildings of 28,000 square feet (each), three single-story retail buldings of 17,500 square feet (combined), and three single-story restaurant pad buildings of 17,000 square feet (combined) on three parcels (combined area = 8 4 acres) located Industrial Park (IP) District (Subarea 7) at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Elm Avenue, APN APN 0208-961-05, -06, -07 III. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the Gina and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda IV. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Admm~strat~ve Regulations that set an 11 00 p m adjournment hme If items go beyond that hme, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commisson THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL ADJOURN TO A SPECIAL MOBILE TOUR OF VARIOUS CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT (CVWD) FACILITIES AT 1:OOPM ON FEBRUARY 24, 2006, BEGINNING AT THE MAIN FACILITY LOCATED AT 10440 ASHFORD STREET. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA FEBRUARY 22, 2006 G'~ ONGA Z Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is m session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at http•Ilwww ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us 1, Lois J Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on February 16, 2006, at least 72 hours poor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga ~~ If you need special assistance or accommodations to partiapate in this meeting, please contact the Planning D~wsion at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours pnor to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ® ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired r 1 LJ CJ Vicinity Map • Planning Commission Workshop February 22, 2006 i • S P H E R E O F I N F L U E N C E A • /~/ City Boundary (as of 12/20/2005) PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 06-09 DRC2005-00986 - MERITAGE HOMES February 22, 2006 Page 3 5) Monterey and San Juan elevation shall incorporate a functional balcony as a standard, not an option Where the standard balcony is not practical, it may be omitted The balconies not used must be reviewed and approved by the City Planner Engineerino Department 1) Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract SUBTT16227 shall apply 2) Prior to Budding Permit Issuance, the "Master Builder" needs to complete the following a) Record project Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) b) Complete LMD plans (Drawing 2020-L), including an alternate streetlight proposal across the Southern California Edison Corridor 3) Before the 150th Budding Permit is issued for Rancho Etiwanda Estates, Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall be open to traffic 4) Before any occupancy, A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA 5) Pay the Traffic Circulation Improvement Fee prior to Building Permit issuance currently estimated at $2,348 per residence, although a reimbursement agreement submitted for actual costs is expected soon 6) t#~e ~eeead-pf~ase 6) All development phases will require two means of access if any lot in that phase is more than 600 feet from the primary access. Construct the State, Overland, Imperial, Melody, and DuPont connection with the first phase. Melon Drive and a portion of Del Rey Drive in Tract 16227-2 shall be complete prior to Phase 10. 7) The City Street Improvement Plan Mylars shall be revised and approved by the City Engineer so that the driveway widths at the back of the sidewalk do not exceed 40 percent of the lot frontage A-41 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA F E 8 2 2 2006 RECEIVED -PLANNING ~j ~ /dSO0 ~ v ~ o~,~,;vwJ ~~; ~ 8d7 ~a..,.al~, ~i,u:oe-mo-~Q,, L'R 9/qa9- D8o7 f.Q,, LEI 9d33S- 59b8 f /9~ o7oa ~ ~,: APN d22S- abl-~.s 0-000 ~,.,,,d- Ain' o2~s-o~/-/~-o-ooa OU~Wv Y,~.,,.,z.•-ro~ C=o»..on-~¢a~or~J D .,J9.Xi ~~ .Gueecor~~Q "` ~J' ~ f he~c,ao-,~ Ca-c~~, .~,~fih. ~e~..,~d-, ~ ~ • -°~z a'ye' t ~ { tti,~t ~ caw ~`°~-`.~a., ~w .~. ~~~ ~ ~•b ,vrci 2~/ . ~~ ~ ~ o+.~ti ~u,~ „o-a ~ r~i FamiN Practice PhYSician & Designated Immigration Medical Examiner SHENG H. CHANG, M.D., INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA F E B 2 2 2006 RECEIVED -PLANNING February 20, 2006 To Planning Coinmissioners City of Ranch Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr P O Box 807 rancho Cucamonga CA 9i72n Attu Cazohne Via Fax and Certified Mail Re The proposed changes of zoning for the properties-within the sphere of influence of the city of Rancho Cucamonga, specifically speaking APN# 22505132 Deaz Caroline and member of planning commission, I have received "Notice of Public Hearing Planning Commission" on or around February l0a' I could not attend the meeting on 2/22/06 due to prior engagement. However, I want to voice my opposition of the city's proposal with this letter The planning by the city of Rancho Cucamonga is unreasWi~ao is benefited from thisthe benefits of all property owners involved The only party whole process of re-zomng is the big developer on the other side of Etiwanda Dlease slog *.hs entire nrecess until a fair way could be fo>ind to develop the entire north side of the city of Rancho Cucamonga Sincerely, Sheng Ch M D roperty Owner of APN# 22505132 c c All property owners involved 500 N Garfield Avenue, Suite 210 Monterey Park, CA 91754, Tel 626-573-0055 Fax 626-573-4087 ShengChangMD@sbcglobal net CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION of GOVERNMENTS Mom OfFce 8T8 West Seventh Street Tzth Floor Los Angeles, California 9om7-3435 [ (n9) z36 sgoo f (z T3) z361ez5 www scag ca gov OIBL[R President iom Young Port Nueneme Hr51 VRe Pesident Wonne Burke Los Angeles Caunry • Second Wa Nevdent Gary putt Sarc BemmtlinD Caunry Immediate Past Resident Ron Pobens iemeinla tmpedal CDUnry-WtloiTarrillo Imperial County •Ian Edney El Centm Las Angeles Caunry Yvpnne Burke Los Angeles County 2ev Varoslanky Los Angeles County bin Aldinger Manhattan Beach • Narry Baltlvnn San Gabriel Paul Bowlen (ermos Todd Campbell Burbank Tony CaMenas Los Angeles Stan Carroll mHabra Heights Margaret Clark Rosemead Gene Darnels Paramount Mrke Dispenia Palmdale • lady Dunlap Inglewood Rae Gabebch Long Beach Damd Galin Downey •Enc Ganetli Los Angeles•Wendy Greuel Los Angeles frank GumlP Cudahy • lame Hahn Los Angeles • Isatlore Hall Compton Keith W Nanks Azusa • lose Huuar Los Angeles •iom Lagorrge Los Angeles • Paula Lantz Pomona Paul Nonatka imran[e • Pam O Connor Santa Mom[a • Alex Padilla Los Mgeles Bernard Parks Los Angeles •Ian Perry Los Angeles • Ed Reyes Las Angeles • Bill Rosendahl Las Angeles •Greiq Smith Los Angeles•iom Sykes WalnW• Paul talbot Alhambra•Sltlneyiyler Pasadena• Ionia Reyes Uranga long Beam Amonm WlWraigosa Los Mgeles Dennis Vhzhbum Calabaus lack Weiss tas Angeles • Herb I Wesson Ir Los Angeles Dennis Zrne Los An4eles Orange County Chris Norby Orange County Christine Barnes La Palma lohn Beauman Brea • Lou Bone lusun • An Brown Buena Park • Alzhard Chavez Anaheim pebble Cook Hunbnqton Beam Cathryn OeYOUng Laguna Niguel R¢Aard Drwn Lake Forest Marilynn Poe Los Alamims Lod Ritlgeway Newport Beam Riverside Counts Ie0 Stone Aivervde Caunry Thomas Buckley Luke Elsinore Bonnie Pockinger Moreno Valley Ron lovendge Riverside Greg PotUS Cathedral Gry Ron Roberts iemxula San Bernardino County Gary DYitt San Bernardino County • Lawrence Dale Barstow Paul Eaton Monttlau • Lee Ann Gartia Grand senate • Lm IasDer town DI Apple Valley • Larrv McCallon Highland • Deborah Robertson Aialta • Alan Wapner Ontario Venturi CmnM Iudy Mrkels Ventura County Glen Beterta Smr Valley (aH Morehouse San Buenaventura•lom YOUng Port Hueneme Orange Caunry Transportation Authontp Lou Correa Counryol Orange Riverside Caunry TnnspDNllon Cnmmisslon Robin lone Hemet Ventura Caunry TnnspDNtiDn CDmmnvon Keith MAlhouse Moorpark ® PrrvM On Per,gM Paper 559 rzhal~s FEB 16 2006 February 15, 2006 RECEIVED -PLANNING Ms Candyce Burnett Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P O Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: SCAG Clearinghouse No. I 20060063 North Eastern Sphere Annexation, Pre-Zone and Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment Dear Ms Burnett: Thank you for submitting the North Eastern Sphere Annexation, Pre-Zone and Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment for review and comment As areawide clearinghouse for regionally significant protects, SCAG reviews the consistency of local plans, protects and programs with regional plans This activity is based on SCAG's responsibilities as a regional planning organization pursuant to state and federal laws and regulations Guidance provided by these reviews is intended to assist local agencies and protect sponsors to take actions that contribute to the attainment of regional goals and policies We have reviewed the North Eastern Sphere Annexation, Pre-Zone and Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment, and have determined that the proposed Protect is not regionally significant per SCAG Intergovernmental Review (IGR) Cntena and Cahforrna Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Section 15206) Therefore, the proposed Protect does not warrant comments at this time Should there be a change in the scope of the proposed Protect, we would appreciate the opportunity to review and comment at that time. A description of the proposed Project was published in SCAG's January 16-31, 2006 lntergovemmental Review Clearinghouse Report for public review and comment The protect title and SCAG Clearinghouse number should be used in all correspondence with SCAG concerning this Protect Correspondence should be sent to the attention of the Clearinghouse Coordinator If you have any questions, please contact me at (213) 236-1851 Thank you S/i~/n7~~c~erely, /'~~ / BRIAN WALLACE Associate Regional Planner Intergovernmental Review Doc. #11835311 Planning Commission Meeting of RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN-UP SHEET Please print your name, address, and city and indicate the item you have spoken regarding Thank you NAME ~~se~1 ~ s 2 P v 3 4 P/' ~ c~ 5 ~~ ~ s,~ 6. l~~ebo~~-h 1~6s-}e~ 7 8 ADDRESS CITY ITEM ~ D ~ `Z (D~ / (,l~2sd/11tyJ l»l ~ bcPC vim- ~a ~-v~ at~-~ bgah ~-1;,,~n,G~ ~~ e ~ 0 Box 53 RC ~ C ~,~,~w~~,dQ ~~4 R1~3 t C ~~ M~~i~ , (~ ~1i73 z ~~~c~i~v~ ~r~~~S~`I~i c 9 k / rv ~~ I" Yl-,(,~b ~X1si AUL` ~`9'"j ~r,4nl D~ 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35. U~;1 ~ ~o~m L'~h l 1135 ~P~ S (~,t . ~f~{-~ //2r- ft ((