The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2006/03/08 - Agenda Packet~Z~ • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA MARCH 8, 2006 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California MEETING CANCELED NO ITEMS SUBMITTED 1, Lois J Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on March 2, 2006, at least 72 hours poor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 C~v~c Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga -- ~,C~+ ,~,. ~z~. n u r1 lJ • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO MARCH 8, 2006 - 7:00 PM CUCAMONGA Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Stewart_ Vice Chairman Maaas Fletcher _ McPhail _ Munoz _ II. ANNOUNCEMENTS WELCOME LOU MUNOZ TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES February 22, 2006 Regular Meeting February 22, 2006 Adjourned Meeting IV. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendaritems are expected to be routine and non-controversial They will be acted on by the Commission atone time without discussion If anyone has concern over any item, d should be removed for d~scuss~on V. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned ind~wduals may voce their opinion of the related project Please wait to be recognized by the Chauman and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per ~nd~vidual for each pro/ect Please sign ~n after speaking PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MARCH 8, 2006 ~i1NCH0 2 (/UCAMONGA A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17493-GREG RAMOS-A Request to subdivide 1 035 gross acre of land into 3 lots within the Low Residential District, located at 10295 19th Street, fronting on both 19th Street and Hamilton Street -APN 1076-121-17 Staff has determined the protect to be exempt from CEQA under categorical exemptions Section 15315 - Minor Land Divisions , B ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17426 - PANATTONI DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC - A request to subdivide an existing parcel of 5 31 acres into 4 parcels in contunction with a proposal to construct a commeraal and office complex comprised of three buildings with a combined floor area of about 42,221 square feet, plus a fourth building of about 7,200 square feet to be developed by others, on a vacant parcel of 5 31 acres in the Industrial Park Distract, Subarea 7, located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue -APN 0229-011-69 and 0208-961-05 Staff has found the protect to be within the scope of a previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program adopted by the Planning Commission on April 28, 1999, and June 28, 2000, respectively, and a Negative Declaration adopted by the Planning Commission on February 13, 2002 This project does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the previous Negative Declarations Related Files Development Review DR99-11, Modification to Development Review DRCDR99-11 MOD, Tentatroe Parcel Map SUBTPM15630, Development Review DRC2004-01125, and Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00764 C DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2005-01083 - SAHGA GROUP - A request to amend Table 17 32 030 -Use Regulations for Foothill Boulevard Distracts of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, adding Thrift Stores as a conditionally permitted use in Subarea 2 of the Community Commeraal Districts, located along Foothill Boulevard between Cucamonga Creek and Hellman Avenue D ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP - SUBTT17783 -CHARLES JOSEPH AND ASSOCIATES - A proposed subdivision to convert 589 existing residential apartments into 589 residential condominiums within the Mentage and Chambray projects on 24 6 acres of land in the Mixed-Use/High Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Arbors Village of the Victoria Community Plan, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Foothill Boulevard APN 0227-201- 38, 41, and 42 Related File Development Review DRC2003-00337 This action includes approval of • n U C~ • ~J PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MARCH 8, 2006 jtnrrcxo 3 cUCAMONGA an Addendum pursuant to the California Quality Act Section 15164, to the previously adopted Negative Declaration that was adopted by the Planning Commission on December, 10, 2003 VI. NEw BUSINESS E CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL FOR DRC2003-00957 - GEORGE JABER - An appeal of the City Planner's denial of application for incompleteness regarding the proposed development of 4 condominium residential units, to include two duplex buildings, on 59 net acre of land in the Medium Residential Distract (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located on the northeast corner of 19th Street and Hellman Avenue - APN 0201-474-10 Related File Preliminary Review DRC2003-00518 VII. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS IX. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Adm~nistrat~ve Regulations that set an 11 00 p m adloumment bme If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent o(the Commission 1, Lois J Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the Cdy o(Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on March 2, 2006, at least 72 hours poor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Ciwc Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamo~ n/g PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MARCH 8, 2006 C~ oNCn 4 Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers whsle the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at http•l/www.ci.rancho-cucamonaa ca us If you need speaal assistance or accommodations to partiapate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Division at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ® ensure accessibility Listening dewces are available for the heanng impaired • Vicinity Map • Planning Commission Meeting March 8, 2006 C • N e ~ Meeting Location Rancho Cucamonga City Hall 10500 Croic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 0 Sphere1.shp /\/ City Boundary (as of 12/20/2005) ~ T H E C I T Y O F RANCUO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE March 8, 2006 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner gy Lou LeBlanc, Assistant Planner SUBJECT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17493 -Greg Ramos- A request to subdivide 1 035 gross acre of land into 3 lots within the Low Residential District, located at 10295 19th Street, fronting on both 19th Street and Hamilton Street - APN 1076- 121-17 Staff has determined project to be exempt from CEQA under categorical exemptions Section 15315 Minor Land Droisions • PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zomno North - Low Residential Distract South - Low Residential District East - Low Residential Distract West - Low Residential Distract B General Plan Designations Project Site - Low Residential District North - Low Residential Distract South - Low Residential District East - Low Residential Distract West - Low Residential District C Site Characteristics The protect has an existing house that wdl remain on 1 of the 3 lots Along the eastern side of the property, is a Eucalyptus windrow running north to south ANALYSIS A General Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17493 creates one large parcel totaling 28,262 60 square feet fronting on 19th Street and 2 smaller parcels totaling 8,100 • square feet, each fronting Hamilton Street The existing house and garage located on Item A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17493 March 8, 2006 • Page 2 Parcel 1 shall remain The existing one-car garage located on both Parcels 1 and 3 wdl be removed The proposed project on the 1 035-acre site meets or exceeds all development standards of the Low Residential Distract B Design Review Committee The Design Review Committee reviewed the Site-Plan on January 17, 2006 (Exhibit B) The protect has no elevations or architecture to review The Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Diaz) recommended approval of the protect C Technical Review Committee The Technical Review Committee reviewed the protect on January 17, 2006, and recommended approval subtect to the Standard Conditions outlined in the resolution of approval D Environmental Assessment Staff has determined the protect to be exempt from CEQA under Categorical Exemptions Section 15315 Minor Land Divisions CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17493 by the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions • Re~cffu submitted p an, Acting City Planner BB LUge Attachments Exhibit A -Location Map Exhibit B -Site Plan Exhibit C -Grading Plan Exhibit D -Aerial Photo Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17493 • ~- a Windows Live Local Page 1 of 1 Windows Live Local [use current map view] • powered by Virtual Earth Beta What Business name or cafe9ory Where Address, a[y, or other place Welcome Scratch Pad Locate Me Permalink Add Pushpir~ Directions Settings Community Help About 110 1 ~ finch Ave ~ ~ Blackoek SI s < m w Q ~ SKIMn Or V C ~ INE 1 6 V ~ N t ~~ x = o a m ner Rd a ~ Heather SI m ~ rn a 0 m 4 ~ ¢ G 1 ~ w m ~ ~ _ ~ m v Pong Ave i. Ring Ave m - _ _ _ _ _ _ m ~ _ _ r. • _ __ T91h St ~..J _ _ , _ __ _ _ _ __ 1 ~ a Gala Ave ~ o Gala A F L" x ~ m m m _E Hamilton SI„, _ _~. _, _~• r ~b ~ .(~: t. a' Hamtltnn Sl ,~ rile Sl m ul .T.' . :~.' r , }~' `[? .. ~ m m ~ ' `.'~' .->tJH~ermo a Park;'(:- ~ -- - Jonquil Dr ~' PGN.IY/"~ :.,~ ~~ • •~{ HoNy Sl ,' ~.._ ~ ~~v T..,; ~',.:~5_~~. ~_..T ~.! Helry St t HoGY St Vidone SI Golden Yarrow Ln Manle VrAa SI 1 -- ~k i• a' m w s • G~Nibl'I" ~ http://local 1TVe.com/ ,~'3 l 2/6/2006 n. I i i ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~2 In_ ~ ~ ~ I I I ~ i ~ s ~ :~ 53 • ~ ~ ~'3 'y g ~E F 3 o 4 pp ftl ~ ~Y 6€ W ~ L o~ g ~ ~8 8 ~5?~~ _ ~ §§ e. N „ w . ~ t, ° Z ;~ Q a J "o w'o F- _ i^ = N V , 4 2' 4 O i i ~.~. Y1 ~ X38 a e~`~~C~ E y ~a~{@Y C~Fi ~'~ CLl I6 YJ 6YIVIO M'6 Yj ~'9NpYYJ1YJ pIYJNyy ~ 1123163/~Y YLIUB Miir 133tl1S WBt S8[01 SOM'tl a~`~ NOI1MJOl1~3fOtld tlOd (13tlVd3tld k~~ n ~ r ~~~ k~@ F, k n § 5 0 ~~6B ~~• k3 L<~ n 5F G~ ~~f ~ ~ 0 a qq ynk ~ ^a p ~ n ~ n ; 9 ~ e ~ b q k ~~~ e ~ ~ n a~3 ~~~ ~~cnc,~ it ~ ~ ~ ~: : Qk $a ~kpp f ~bla .~ e k~9 pp tak ~ ' g k 5k 5 5 'kgp E ~PnP`t ~ a8 ~ ~~ >< ° ~ c E5 LgL '~` E 9 @@ Q 9 i$3~ ~ (g k~~5 ~ ~3~ ~~ i s€ I ~- --_ - _ 8 N i ~I ~I 9 ~~~ /Z a r m ti O z w N Q U ~+ ~~ W W iW?m ~ 'N e o _ p_- -__~_.-__- tl ~~ D~o~ 55 5 __ p8 ~~ 3 a 3~ o~;V ~ ! ~° EI En ~~o~ 3't S I-~i.' ~ ~pp prr 19 ~ ~ A~ ~_ 33 8~ ~~ ~ t~~ ntl bk ouou J-B-_ _~ __ ~ ~ ~ i p3 Y ~ pC+~ i~y E FGF~ I a Q lottl lsr siavrl ~5 E9" n Eppi gat 4b Qp7n pp3 t 1='I-"~x :~^ n n 3onam Iri l.s. nam _ '~ ~ 4a A ~yF~ t EapEaE !aH~ ~~p ~'~°C I' ~ I ~~ I ;~ 5 ~g ~ ~b° E ~pA p~~ ~d3 a ` iSk i~ ''ddA6 a8 ~ ~ ~ jib ,g "jai Wg ~ ~~~;eas ~~~~n~~ee2 W: a 5n5 b g6~ t f ~ r iu yi I / a ~ ~ e I ~ a ~ j ~F 6 ~~ ~ QF ~ kai Qat k~G J ~`. ~ d j 5 o p' 8 pga 1 ~' 1 °~~ ~a ea~ i°.a Ii ~Ii ~ F ~G~~S~~'~~gg~e~~+~~F ~~d a a p yc emL ~iQ b Q ~_ ~ . ~ ~k~k~k~aei~ ~a :N~ II W 3 i _ _ _ -r .~anr: '•am an s.sr~m ~ ~S~ il'K: I ' ~~ ~ ~e ~~ ~ ~~ f 6q m ~ !y ii e W O ~ ~ pp ~~i i ~n ~ e t q~ ~ gg 0 ~ ~ ~ :, ~5 N Igo \ an i~ "! ~~`~.~~#~~ §' !~"~"; E ~ 3 s` d ° I ` g N'f ~. S ~ ~ ~ L isi{1` ~~ r j !!! 3 y d~ ~ ~1 I +~ 1 ~ ~~~~~a~a:pa 6 a gL, ~ p p a ~ I~ y -l -=~tt-- `-- ~ -4a ~=_ b_ ~L_o k3 jl_ ~ EXHIQIT E3~a __ 6Ti~;> g~ I `.~ 2 • • I • ~ IWY C'~^..6 V+ryl .UM 4 ~ ~ Iii ~1~ ~` 1~ I ~B ,,e~ a. ,,,.a~ ,'~ = R ~ ~~ a ~' g ~ ~~~ E5~ ;(~~ F i a 9 i t~~ 1~ ~ e $I Q8i ~ 9~E~~~ @ ~3 6 A 55 44 ~~6~ ll~s 1 ev~ 181 M O1 q ~i3s L n 8~- i a m ! ~~ i J M ~ ° = I W i ~ ~~ ~ :~, ' E s B! ~--- -----__ ~_~ ~~ a-_.-._- ----- _-- .~~ ~ C~ Z \1 , aJ.. ~ - Z Q o Q ° 1V~ L~. `, _l ` ~~ ~~-_ ~. ~- ~ ~ ~ a Z ~ 1 ,, ° `-`, ~. ~ ~ -- y~ ` ___~ ~- ry .Ktf Lf1 naw / I,~ d I ~/ JI _ ~~ i ~ a ~ I I ~ /s I 'I / a I I ! Q~I I W ~ g u ~ Q -" ~ ~. R .. BlJ'~ SI~~ ~ Y ~ 4 ~ R4 L~NM` AS LI LSI _--'i a~ ,^~_ ,m ~,` ~,~_ . ~F~J Wry,^F n ` ~ AAAf ' ' -f ~~ ~ ~~~ '' ~ '~~ -I ,~ e_-- ' -~ 4 r _- EE~~~eRi~l~ -EXHIBIT C Windows Live Local Page 1 of 1 ~4 ~; Windows Live Local --~ [use curr map view] µ? •_ o. t. Vutual Eatth Betd What ousu~r~a nemr or ca tegon Where ess, cup or uUrer pface ~, 6~~~f ~r,',i~y+~j • ~~' ~'~ ~ ~ r~ 2/6/2006 http //local live com/ • RESOLUTION NO 06-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17493, LOCATED WITHIN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AT 1029519TH STREET, FRONTING BOTH 19TH STREET AND HAMILTON STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1076-121-17 A Recitals 1 Greg Ramos filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17493, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 8th day of March 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said heanng on that date 3 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public hearing on March 8, 2006, including wntten and oral staff reports together with public testimony, this Commission hereby spenfically finds as follows a The application applies to the property located at 10295 19th Street, with a street frontage of 135 feet and lot depth of 329 16 feet and is presently improved with curb and gutter There is a Eucalyptus windrow running north to south along the eastern side of the property, and b The property to the north of the subject site is developed with existing residential buildings, the property to the south consists of existing residential buildings, the property to the east consists of existing residential buildings, and the property to the west also consists of existing residential buildings, and c The application proposes a subdivision creating 1 large parcel totaling 28,262 60 square feet fronting 19th Street and 2 smaller parcels totaling 8,100 square feet each fronting Hamilton Street, and d The protect, together with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with • all single-family residential development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-12 SUBTPM17493 -GREG RAMOS March 8, 2006 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the • above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed protect is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan, and b The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and c The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially incurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity 4 Staff has determined the project to be exempt from CEQA under Categorical Exemptions Section 15315 Minor Land Divisions 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department • 1) If grading will necessitate removal of any heritage trees such as the Eucalyptus windrow, then the applicant shall submit an application and fees for a Tree Removal Permit prior to issuance of any Grading Permit Engineering Department 1) Parcels 2 and 3 shall accept the drainage from Parcel 1 and provide private drainage easements on the easterly sides of both Parcels 2 and 3 in favor of Parcel 1 on Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17493 2) Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited to, installing street trees on 19th Street, per City standards to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Revise the existing Street Improvement Plans as needed Protect the existing curb and gutter, sidewalk and drive approach, or repair as regwred, protect the existing or provide R26(s) 'No Stopping' signs Provide traffic signing and striping as required Plan check fees for the above revision are required 3) At the time of development, Hamilton Street improvements are to be in accordance with City "Local Street" standards as required and including provide sidewalk, drive approaches and street trees on Hamilton Street, protect the existing curb and gutter and street light, or • repair as regwred on Hamilton Street Provide traffic signing and ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-12 SUBTPM17493 -GREG RAMOS March 8, 2006 • Page 3 striping as regwred Revise the existing Street Improvement Plans as needed Plan check fees for the above revision are regwred 4) At time of development, provide a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and identify applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the Conceptual Grading Plan 5) Fees due at Bwlding Permit Transportation, General City Drainage, Park, and Beautification The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF MARCH 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman • ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of March 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS -~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17493 SUBJECT: SUBDIVISION OF THREE LOTS APPLICANT: GREG RAMOS LOCATION: 10295 19TH STREET-APN 1076-121-17 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Completion Date A. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition B. Time Limits 1 This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning -/-/- Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/~- siteplans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner • SC-1-OS 1~ Protect No SUBTPM17493 Completion Date 3 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for • consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bulding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdmston, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 4 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit tssuance 5 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Cary Planner For stngle- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 6 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 7 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the tssuance of bulding permits 8 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice • requirements, special street posting, phone listing for communiryconcerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing 9 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adfotning property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street E. Landscaping A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of building permits or pnor final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 3 Ali private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet m vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as • follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or SC-1-OS / / / / / / ~_/- / / ~~- ~-/- _/~_ -J-/- -J-~ ~~. ~~ Protect No SU8TPM77493 Completion Date larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy • 4 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously -!_/_ maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satistactory condition 5 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included to -/~_ the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department 6 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the -/~_ perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 7. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the -/~- design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) F. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following ~~- a Site/Plot Plan, • b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Project Number (i e , SUBTPM17493) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report ~_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wei" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to -/-/- the City poor to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls -/-/- G. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction Ali plans shall be -/~_ marked with the project file number (i e , SUBTPM17493) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in • SC-1-05 ~.-~a Prgect No SUBTPM17493 Comoleaon Date effect at the trine of permit application Contact the Bulding and Satety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts Prior to issuance of budding permits for a new residential protect or mator addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not Itmded to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school tees receipt to the Bulding and Safety Department prior to permit issuance The Building and Safety Official shall provide street addresses after tracUparcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits Construction actmty shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays H. New Structures Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness Provide compliance with the California Building Code for requred occupancy separations Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions I. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with California Bwlding Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permds 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing bwidings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Crvd Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. Dedication and Vehicular Access • Rights-oi-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map SC-1-OS 4 ~a3 ~_~- ~~- -J-/- -/~_ _/~_ .~-/- _/-/ -~~ -/_/ -~-~- Prgect No SUBTPM77493 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 60 total teet on Hamilton Street 3 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map 4 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map K. Street Improvements All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, communitytrails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which Is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, ail improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other 19th Street X Hamilton Street X X X Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item Improvement Plans and Construction Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first Prior to any work being performed In public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office In addition to any other permits required Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be Installed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer Comolehon Date _~-~_ -~-~~ -~-~- / / -~-~- / / --~-~~ ~-~- -~-~- _/~_ • SC-1-05 r3 iy Proiect No SUBTPM77493 Completion Date d Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash • deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer e Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drams shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots f Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check 5 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program 6 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adiust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Proiect Engineer. Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Gy. 19 Street Lagerstroemia indite Crape Myrtle Hybrid - 3' 20' O C 24' Box Fill 'Muskogee' lavender in Hamilton Street lagersiroemia indite Crape Myrtle Hybrid - 3' 20' O C 24' Box Fill 'Muskogee' Lavender in • Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backflll soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subiect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only 7 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all proiect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required L. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer M. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the • property from adiacent areas SC-1-OS / / / / ~-/- / / ~-/- -1-/- / / -/-/- / / 6 ~~5 Protect No SUBTPM77493 Completion Date 3 Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured _/_/_ from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk N. Improvement Completion 1 Ii the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, _/_/_ an improvement certificate shall be placed upon the final parcel map, stating that they will be completed upon development for Parcels 2 and 3 on Hamilton Street O. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, ~_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) to accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/_/_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _J_/_ Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is regwred pnor to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits to the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from ail utilities and other interested agencies involved. _/~_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any requirements that may be received from them APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SC-1-05 ~'~~ w..:-~, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection • _ District ~--- Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS September 15, 2005 Greg Ramos Subdivision Single Parcel into (3) SFR lots 10295 19th St SUBTPM17493 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design gwdelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants • a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential protects is 500-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet. b Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are i At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways. u At intersections ui On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. iv. As required by the Fire Safety Diwsion to meet operational needs of the Fire Distract. v A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any bwlding FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The requred fire flow for this protect is 2,000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances • 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provde the regwred fire flow subtect to Fire Distract review and approval Pnvate fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide regwred fire flow /~ Firewater plans are required for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits wdl not be issued until firewater plans are approved. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of • the proposed protect site FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal wdl review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 revew fee Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fue District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard # 9-S and #9-5 All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering • any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fue Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2. Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 3 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The bwlding construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. • ~~g 2 Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with mirnmum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall • be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be wsible from the street When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire Distract use in the event of an emergency at the subfect building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector • u ~-~9 T H E C I T Y O F R A N G M O C II C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE• March 8, 2006 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM. Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner BY Mike Smith, Assistant Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17426 PANATONNI DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC - A request to subdivide an existing parcel of 5 31 acres into 4 parcels m conjunction with a proposal to construct a commercial and office complex comprised of three butldings with a combined floor area of about 42,221 square feet, plus a fourth building of about 7,200 square feet to be developed by others, in the Industrial • Park District, Subarea 7, located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue - APN• 0229-011-69 and 0208-961-05. Staff has found the project to be within the scope of a previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program adopted by the Planning Commission on April 28, 1999, and June 28, 2000, respectively, and a Negative Declaration adopted by the Planning Commission on February 13, 2002. This project does not raise or create new environmental impacts, not already • Fdes: Development considered m the previous Negative Declarations Related Review DR99-11, Modification to Development Review DRCDR99-11MOD, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15630, Development Review DRC2004-01125, and Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00764 BACKGROUND• Construction of a master planned commercial/office complex comprised of four buildings is currently underway on the subject site. The application for three bwldings within this development was reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on August 24, 2005 (related fde Development Review DRC2004-01125), while the application for the fourth building was reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on January 11, 2006 (related fde. Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00764). PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION. A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning• North - Vacant; Community Commercial (CC) District, Terra Vista Community Plan South - Industrial Warehouses; Industrial Park (IP) District, Subarea 7 • East - Commercial Center, Industrial Park (IP) District, Subarea 7 West - Vacant, Industrial Park (IP) District, Subarea 7 Item B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM17426 - PANATONNI DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC March 8, 2006 Page 2 B General Plan Designations Protect Site - Industnal Park North - Mixed-Use South - Industnal Park East - Industrial Park West - Industnal Park C. Site Characteristics' The protect site is a vacant parcel of about 5.31 acres in the Industnal Park District, Subarea 7. The parcel is generally rectangular in shape with its pnmary axis aligned north to south. The protect site is bound to the south by an industrial building; to the east is a commercial center that includes, among other uses, Lowes Home Improvement and Islands restaurant, the property to the north and the matonty of the properties to the west are vacant. The subject property is generally level with no significant slope. Vegetation on the site has recently been removed because of the grading-related activities A north to south rail line spur terminates at the southwest corner of the protect site. Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue are both classrfied as Major Divided Arterials • ANALYSIS' A. General The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into four parcels of 34,267 square feet (Parcel 1), 63,785 square feet (Parcel 2), 50,847 square feet (Parcel 3), and • 82,666 square feet (Parcel 4) (Exhibit C). On each new parcel will be one of the bwldmgs of the previously approved master planned commeraal/office complex The Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17426 does not cause, or regwre, any changes to the site layout, the plotting of the bwldmgs, or the architecture of the building. Although shared access, parking, and maintenance easements will be a condition of approval, each lot will have the number of parking spaces needed to satisfy the parking regwrement of the building on which it is built. B. Desion Gradino and Technical Review Committees: The Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Stewart, Coleman) reviewed Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17426 on January 31, 2006. As the application is only a proposal to subdivide the property with no changes to the site layout or building architecture, the Committee recommended approval. Incorporated into the Resolution of Approval is a condition requiring a shared parking access and maintenance agreement among all the property owners/tenants. The Grading Review Committee also reviewed the protect on January 31, 2006. Fording that the proposal will not regwre changes in the previously approved Grading Plan, the Grading Review Committee recommended approval Technical comments were provided to the applicant and have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. C Environmental Assessment. The 5 31-acre site is within the Master Planned Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park, a 140-acre commeraal and Industnal complex generally located between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route on both sides of Milliken Avenue. The design of the protect is in compliance with the approved Master Plan (Development Review DRC99-11 and Development Review Modification DRC99-11 MOD). A Mitigated • Negative Declaration was adopted for the original Master Plan in April of 1999. Subsequently, in June of 2000, a Mitigation Monitoring Program was adopted by the Planning Commission, and in February of 2002, a Negative Declaration was adopted for modification to the original Master Plan (yD~RC99-11 MOD) and the corresponding Tentative LJ"a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM17426 - PANATONNI DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC • March 8, 2006 Page 3 Parcel Map SUBTPM15630 for this site. The project wdl be regwred to implement all pertinent mitigation measures adopted in the previous Negative Declarations, thereby ensuring that any potential impacts of the project will remain less-than-significant The staff is of the opinion that no further environmental review is necessary because the protect is• (1) consistent with the approved Master Plan, and (2) within in the protect scope of the above-cited prior Environmental Assessments CORRESPONDENCE. This item was advertised as a public hearing m the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the protect site No comments have been received. RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends approval of Tentatve Parcel Map SUBTPM17426 through t~Q-aac~ption of the att~ed Resolution of Approval with Conditions. Dan Coleman Acting City Planner . DC.MS/ge Attachments Exhibit A -Location Map Exhibit B -Aerial Photo Exhibit C -Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17426 Exhibit D -Grading Plan and Cross-Sections Exhibit E -Design Rewew Committee Comments dated January 31, 2006 Exhibit F -Initial Study Part II Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17426 r~ I~ [3 3 ,~ ~~. PROJECT SITE ~~ ~, -~ „ ,,.. _ s ~, a N ^ . ~~~ _ ~+~y M~b OWN ~ b , . ^- "_ NETHOLINK S4tl IN m .^w r,.- _ - ~4+~ , ~T~~\ ~~ EXHIBIT A I ~ ~ ~ ~ ' I ~~~-k. .r 1 Er i. ~~~~ii ~ F iu='t !«'~' _ ii ~'~.~ >"2:n' ~} ia~ ril'1 ~Yi _ ~ ~~ ' ' 1 i~ M ~<`4 r`tr r ~ i ~. ~ ~_ 18 i ~_,,_ X": 4 `P~ .`fir. ,,;,'+_~ ~,._~i mot. -iTt,; t2_''~-"t;+„i S'~~-, r' ~ i~ *'~' r _ r?t;..~ .' h'. °~r ~ '~;z _..a; F~~ IT EXHI~ B r, ~'~~~"~)i,'a _'7 ~' E5 ~ y.. `-S o7 ,. . _ ~I ~Jms~l ~i 9Zbt/'ON dVW 139tlVd 3AI1tl1N31 tlINtlOlITIO'1ICMCPIYOfIO tlMCiMttl ~~ .~ ' 3 1 9 ~ 'OA791111LLO0i GNtl'3At/ N371111~1 'tl07 MS • • • I AVM31V0 I~IHlOOd • a f N Q a ~ V 'gi r 0 !I s Z Q ~~ Q '~ J Z i J ~ '~ Ua,:: U ~:o ~~ Q U ~ ~O ~ U ~_ Q ~ °~~ ~~ ~~, ~~ U.~~ l1J `' ;' ~/ z ~,, ` ~~~ ~, [ ~Jf i 4 r e a P i' t v F i tl ~~P~~i~ a a~~ ~ 1 ;o~ f !. ' P t a ps ;~B iP !~ P a P fs f o E ~ ~ ~ i J~ :; ~ 6 ~ ~a P ~ eAfl; ~ ~ P IFe If tl 1• ~ r `~EPi iP ~ IC tie !8 ~ '~ B~~ ~ ~ @;g I. i ii ~i ~~.~ ; 9 ~ EXHIBIT C $-~ } f ~S 8 xi 3 ©i• ~nI i I ~ ~ ~I r ~ Y. °I ICI .". r III, (~~ ~ I I~ IK'I I,~ l r r„ I I1 III I, ~' ~ Illrl l =' I r l l~ I I ' I ~ I h ._ r I~ I I~ I I ~ Ir ~ _~_ I I ~I~ _ III ~ 4~,1 I ~, r~ I`LI ` n ~ .~ `i ¢ ~ 'I I l ~rl I y 1 I` c I ~C~ 'yy > I ' II1 I I 1' ' al Id ~ 1;1 I i ' '~\ _.-_P R -'~_ ~ I' I 'V 1 'Y1 ~°--' -C' F I ' ~` l ~ I --- - i¢- --- %i i ~ _ \ ~'`-- -- -I I i I i• ~l ~PPI -- i I Im \\~ ~ I ~ _ . it i~ o «.a I "• - -_- ---- r I -- __-- Il rr.~~ ° I ~~ ~ 1 ®~B® ~ I I AI ~- f ~ I I i` ~ ~ ; - I IB I ~. I II'~\ y ~~ ~I r~'Vl~ ---, T I ,II ~I qS~ i \,\r \ I ° i P `h ~~ 1} }I I+I Ili ,1 ~ ~a ~ I { ~ III ~~'~ d~ ~ ~I' ~1111~ /Ilr 1 n 'qdf~ a s 6 e i III% I I U • I \ d' ~ I~~ ~~ i~ d~l"k' I~I~ :I ~ I .1 i 1 1111111 I SS d ~ f `ii III~I%~ le; I ~ f ~~ ~~N ,'r di/~i4 ~1 ~ ~ Ir III ;; fir' ~,ll ile rr` 1 ~ 1 I' 1 II ~ ~ I F11 i~PPil~ i.r ~ 11`}, I ~ ~ Gr ~ d~'~~~1' ~dl$~I l~lii I i~ i 1~ 19 ~1 gl~ld~ I~ 1. ~I '~ 1 , Q ! ~~~ •~ ~ ~f~1 I~ it 1 I ,I i g, m III I ooboooooooo®o~ 11 1 ~ :l '~' n/~ F I 'i a~,r ,+~ ,fal,~ 1 'r, 1 I 'I~ `j ~~ ~,~j ~ ; I 't't r / ~ i 1~ I , I~ ~ ~ I i 1 Y .~ I P I/d I „{ i I .,, I 9 I Y F~~ I df ~ ~.~, i( 1 ~3'; ~I~ t~ ~~ g~' ~ i P I ~ !. P~.~g, ry,'ic ~I'• ~1 +u ~ P ~i r~l PIS a 1 ,f i r iPp ~n';r A`~I ~' , I I~ f' ~ ~~i:'' P ~'i~IPr„~ dl I I ll~t SI , jr.l_ PP~i~,~'~°['r d~~ddl I- I ~~~ ~ l b .~~I'~' ~ f I ~~i j y~ ~ ¢ '~~~~ . ~~! ~ i , ~' ~,~~ t r I i I 1 EXHIBIT D ~w';;I tlP'O1p~7Y~ YON01Pt~fp 01t7111IM .~..I {. P o ON 'OAlB TILLOOJ OIY 3AV 1®fT11 7lD~ M4 1 AtlM31tlO l'iiLOOd ~~ ~~ ~ ~ v~r ~~ ~~ ~ `~ I ~\\~ ©Z ~~ ~lr ~J 1~Y~~- • i tit ~ ~,r L~-=-S r ~.,c ~I I II ~ \` I 7 ~~ _J I _ ~`, \,I --'---r~ - ~,~ -'t-~ ~~ -- _ °~~ .___ ~ r I v \ ~=p\»~~s+t~i~ \~ ~~~' ~ I I ' r I \, 'v fir! II ,. ~ L 311N! r1771fTLw' rr~l*- -~,-- - .•T~- _ _ _r_.. __. __ ~F_ _ _ ___ - _r__ ___ It f__. __ ~ - `~ ~ I I ~' i I ' ;' ~ I ~ T/r I ~ }iS ie 1 ~~ 1~~ ~ ~~ i c ~~ \ i , '' ~ - \ r_. - ~~ \ ~ , ,.~ G. ;~ ,_, >-~ ~ . ~:, ~ ~, Nria ~wara~ Trru ~ I ! k ~~ .e,~~-.~ r~mo~ wono~naro aaMru ~~~0 'anie nilood oir 311r imn11 110 M4 ..3 i1~A I AVM31tlD T1i100~ . N N c ~. l Yp ~ 1F h ~~~.~ ~ ,- '- ' ~ i ~ o i : _ - ~ ~ V _~ ~ ~ ~ ~_~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ A ~ l- _ _--_-ter -_- _- - -i -_I_ - i ._ -\~~ ~ ~ _ _ r~ _ - -__ - ~ _ -`_y `' K •~ I ~ ) ~ ~ ~ ~~~ 6{ ~l t ~` ~, ~ 6!. !' i / BB+~~ \ ~~~'P F~Opg. ~ ~ P ~ ~~ti '~~I~66{~! ~~ , ~ ,, I y ~,~.A ~ ~ .~ ~ a ~~.r ~~ ~ ~~~ \ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ M ~~ ~ ~ ' ~ _ / _ __ __ ~._ P ~ _ e ~_ ~ ~ • ~ .~ ~ ` : ~ ~oeoo0oooomccoo ~d~ Z i= g ~ _ ~ rT ~ E ~;4~ 3 Z a~ rF-- e i ~ i ~i C l~p i ~ ~ f u i W ~ (I 0 i ~(~~' 6 ~ ~,f i ' U i `% i• t.~.. vwio~v~ vwawvom aoinu aasu nil avn Suva anuvna- i~ ~fi @I ~~ ~ w ~ is e Fis ° ~~ Pali !8~~ ~ boo i itii F F I i ! E 918 ~ ~ ~~ ~ .~ - ~ < ~ c !~ 1 i~1 t 1 @ ~e ~ ~ '~ 86~~ ~ i ~~ ~I@q!`@ @ i9~~ f0' ~~PI 51 @ IF! ~ il€ F i ~ ter.-„,~, i r 0 J me ..? =a 8 W 7 <a :! 3~ s e @ B ~' i1 w s ~ B~ ~~ ~ ~ ` Bf t r1 r B ae i11 Y @ @ ' B B i fj j ~f ' 7 B ~ ~ @ e aB' ~ p ~ g ~ @ ! A s ~i `~E tt to B 1@Iei4t°! P ~ yi':1~: ~~p1'411~^1 - ii @B ~ ~@ B°B'-@69o6'i ~ ~6 6l~i~@.@@i@ ~@ i5 1 !@ ~° ,B rma ~laavl~ r-ruaaol+oo ``s I ~ ! ~ ~~ .~~e`~ vwadrno'vAiAawYOin AM7NYtl ® 9L1/l 'ON d11N ~~tlYd 311LLY1191 @ i ~~ 1 AtlM31VJ l'iilOOd s ~ t a I 1' u, ~' Ili ~~ •,~i:_`-,~ti \~.\ n ~, f, I Y i r ' III' ~A i t` I~:J ~ "YY""~~~/°1 \~\\;\\...\\\~ ~_~SiY "t, ti 1 I 1\\ ~~ ' i~; I I X11 I. ~~ ~ I~' \ \\ ~~- ~~ c , 111 I V , I I I, f ~' .,T~ 1~ \ \~\ \ ~\\ j~ I ~ ' ~ k V vA' ~ III ~ ~"" ~%A4',v ~ /d"~ ~~~ vt f"1 ~ N , I 'I I b I ~~ ~.. I I c I~ jr~ • .~1'~~~~C~ r.A~ i~-t i rYL ~ _ ^ U i ,. Ve, l , 1 , ~ ~ ~ ~_ , _I a ~-- e I ,•~,+ t i i~ '. \ y \ II I I `~ I ~~ \ f - ~_ ___ I r ~ ~ . I ___z.__ __._-~R f `_~____ II I c ~ ) 1 L-i~fa~~ - I I I~ \~ ` \ \ ~~ 1 II ~ I P P 1 1I 1I ~-•~ ~ j 11 ~C ~\ \Y r~T ~~ L - 6 C 1 t y1 ~I E /~_____ r-_-1 i ° -~ --T -~T 1 _-__ _-_ .- _ 7 Y M771fl1U ~r~F{-_- --- - rt - _ o i ~ { f ~ I I 1 __ _ liy_ _ __ ~~ -_- _ ._ c __ _ _ I ~ t ~, ~ I I _-_ .,~__ __ m 1 ..- _____~_ ___ 1_I t-- g{-pg ~ _ /__/_ , n I r - - ~- d I \, j -~- li'j II/'~ I\~ a 'III ~~ r I A ~ i ~ ~ ~ I p <I ' I ~\ ~ ~~ ~~ ~li ~~~ ~ ;R ~ -~sB I. ~I ° I!I tl 1 66 gp 71 ~~ i~ ~. ' Ij~ jl,~~t`rI' ~ ~ ~ p6p ~ PI 1 1 ~ I ~ ~ ,,,h111 e Ili ~i~ ll~ `I n 1 1',r !ii ~I +I. 1M~ h ii , , !! s~~;'i~~~jt;~;l~! ,;~,, I q;! pp i ~~i ~ I ! l i 0' ~ ~ Q ~ ~` { : -{ f "jti I, i a I ~l1~kt 11 p~~{~~~~'i~i it ~u tl I t ~ f t~A~ PI i ~ pl , 1 ~6PPIpP I~~ I' I, I , p1~.,4I,~~~ib 1, I I ,I >a e f I li i iiJ~~i~>~i,~~~~i~; rl •,~ I I 00®OO®®6D~mK^~ 1 I ~ . ~ ~~ 99 ti, ,~ I ~ ~ ~ 'F I ; i '. - ';fin f,„~ I' 'C ,1 r , . ~~ I t, lll~+ lit k ~~} I ~,A ~~ I l l ~i I t n I ~ 1 I ,A I!° 'L ', ~ s !i I' 1 i I, ~ I 't I t ~i ~t~~ t:'l~,p ~ I '~ ,1, 1 ,- 1 . % ~ /,~ ~ ~_-1. y d a I ~ ~ ~ . ~~ ,I ° i ~ I ~ 1 , A ~ ~ I (~ I ~ ~ ~. ! ~f f ~-(~ ~ -~ N \~ - i ~-- o a ~~ .°..'L:,.. MI'ld 'JNOtllfJ ltlllld3')NO'J ~. ©~ ~® xsa rou avw ~uvd anuv~ I AtlM31tlD T1ilOOd e N N r '1aC' _ ~ ~ ~ w' ~ ale ~ " -~--•~- ~ ^ ~ '^~-7 N ~ l ~.~ ~ 1. l / __ ~_LJ_L~~~,11~ ~4-~ _-.~ 1.~ ~ ,~-_„~~' a~~~ _T~~__ _ ~--- / 6 4Tl ~~~-\~~I! ......woes r m 1~... ~-_~ 'y~,+ -~~~ ~~-•-L_~~ac`. 1_ ~.~~ ~a+±~ _s1r r /~ _ b e W WK[N 11VEl1UE~ ~'1 ~` ~/ _ _ ~' _ L ~ ~ ~ ~ r _ - ~-- - l _ 16i ~ I t I ' ' i _ _ _ _ ~~ ~ Ifs` f _ _ may} ~` _ ~!-.~= _-` = - '\~l~ t~~' 'j ;~ ~ ~_ ' y\ g a e - - + ~--- , ~ ~ -~ a E i ,, it ~ ~ ~ ~~ p t~ gg s ` ~ pp ! Ih 1 `:.' G ~ ~ ~~ ~kt'ty ~ ~e ~ Y `~ ~' yy ~ ~ \ it ~~~, ~~~\\J~~~~i~~~66~~1 I~ tl f ~,~\~~~~ ~~~ ~~ u ~ Z I i ! e , ~ ~V ~, ~~ ~ -: «-r ~ ~ ilk: ~`~, ~..A~,~~~: ~ ~ ~~.~.~ ~ ~ V ~, g t p _ _ _ _ e ~~ ~ '1 lI SIT ~,~ ~~~~-~ ~-, ~ v ~v~ ~~~~! ~ ~, , ~ ~~ it ~ -- !. .~A~~~ ~\~~~~~~A:`. ~_ ~ Su ~.`e~~p.l.l~4IYYYS ~_ ~ ~ p4 t3 hg ge ~p ~ ~ ~ 111 --I~A~~~~: ~~~ ~~~ t~ :~ ~~~ ~AA~.~~~~~~~~Itltf~ ~ ~ ~ J { ~- ~ • \ • •` ~` . ~ ~ ~ V `000D0000000000 ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ , % / ~ -_ 4'~ 4,i a og ~ r, aNn uaadoad Alaa157M .., 3Nn Altl3dotld Altl3NltloN =r=- --- - • I:- ~--~ ,,e,~, ---~- - ~' ~.~ lJ 3Nn A1tl3dOtld Altl31SV3 3NIl Altl3dotld Altl31S3M j ____ __ _ _ ---___-• ____ N __ __ '_~r ._ wy '_I__ - __ _.. .____ _- __ -____ .__ ~-__- 4-_. _ _. _. _~ I _. - .. av mo. ~-' N J~ 3Nn uaaaoad Aladls3M -- -- ~. • CONSENT CALENDAR DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 00 p m Mike Smith January 31, 2006 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17426 - PANATTONI DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC - A request to subdivide an existing parcel of 5 31 acres into 4 parcels in coniunction with a proposal to construct a commercial and office complex compnsed of three buildings with a combined floor area of about 42,221 square feet, plus a fourth building of about 7,200 square feet to be developed by others, on a vacant parcel of 5 31 acres in the Industrial Park Distnct (Subarea 7), located at the southwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue - APN 0229-011-69 and 0208-961-05 Staff has found the protect to be within the scope of a previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Momtonng Program adopted by the Planning Commission on Apnl 28, 1999, and June 28, 2000, respectively, and a Negatrve Declaration adopted by the Planning Commission on February 13, 2002 This protect does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the previous Negative Declarations Related files Development Review DR99-11, Development Review Modification DRCDR99-11MOD, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15630, Development Review DRC2004-01125, and Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00764 Design Parameters The subiect property is located at the southwest corner of Foothill • Boulevard and Milliken Avenue Across Milliken Avenue, to the east of the subtect site, is the Lowes Home Improvement specialty retail warehouse, an Islands and other vanous restaurants, and a bank, to the south and southeast are several large warehouse distnbution buildings; to the north is vacant land, and to the west is partially developed land This Tentative parcel Map is for the purpose of subdividing a previously approved master-planned commercal and office complex that was approved by the Planning Commission on August 24, 2005 (related file Development Review DRC2004-01125) The protect site is vacant, the applicable grading and building construction plans are under review The proposed parcel map divides the property into four separate parcels with one building on each parcel. Each parcel will also include a portion of the parking lot of the complex Although the master-plan includes shared parking and access, the number of parking stalls within each parcel will be sufficient to satisfy the parking regwrement of each bwldmg The proposed parcel map complies with the applicable standards as descnbed in the City's Development Code No changes in the Site Plan of the protect, bwldmg architecture, or land use are proposed Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the protect to be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action Desion Review Committee Action Members Present Fletcher, Stewart, Coleman • Staff Planner Mike Smith The Committee recommended approval of the protect EXHIBIT E ~~3 BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II 1. Project File: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17426 2. Related Files: DR99-11, DRCDR99-11MOD, SUBTPM15630, DRC2004-01125, and DRC2005-00764 3. Description of Project: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17426 - PANATTONI DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC - A request to subdivide an existing parcel of 5 31 acres into 4 parcels in contunction with a proposal to construct a commeraal and office complex comprised of three buildings with a combined floor area of about 42,221 square feet, plus a fourth building of about 7,200 square feet to be developed by others, on a vacant parcel of 5 31 acres in the Industrial Park District, Subarea 7, located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue - APN: 0229-011-69 and 0208-961-05 Staff finds the protect to be within the scope of a previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Momtonng Program adopted by the Planning Commission on April 28, 1999, and June 28, 2000, respectively, and a Negative Declaration adopted by the Planning Commission on February 13, 2002. This protect does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the previous Negative Declarations. Related Files Development Review DR99-11, Modification to Development Review DRCDR99-11 MOD, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15630, Development Review DRC2004-01125, and Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00764. The 531-acre site is within the master-planned Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park, a 140-acre commercial and industrial complex located generally at the south side of the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue. The design of the project is in compliance with the approved Master Plan (Development Review DR99-11 and Development Review DRC99-11 MOD) A Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted for the original Master Plan in April of 1999. Subsequently, in June of 2000, a Mitigation Momtonng Program was adopted by the Planning Commission for the original Master Plan (DR99-11) In February of 2002, a Negative Declaration was adopted for modification to the original Master Plan (DRCDR99-11 MOD) and the corresponding parcel map for this site and the surrounding area (SUBTPM15630) The protect will be regwred to implement all pertinent mitigation measures adopted in the previous Negative Declarations, thereby ensuring that any potential impacts of the protect will remain less-than-significant. The Master Plan for the 140-acre site includes a Congestion Management Program/Traffic Impact Analysis (CMP/TIA) The approval of the Master Plan included a Mitigation Monitoring Program, including mitigation of traffic-related impacts, which apply to all protects within the Master Plan. A portion of the 140-acre Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park is within potential habitat for the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (DSF) A Habitat Assessment survey for the DSF was performed for a portion of the Corporate Park Master Plan (west of Milliken Avenue) n U • • B-i4 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17426 Page 2 • known to contain potential habitat The results of the survey were negative, and the Corporate Park lacks the required Delhi-soils that provide appropriate habitat for the fly The proposed protect site is not located within an area known to be potential habitat for the DSF and is about 1,500 feet away from any areas that have been identified as potential habitat for the DSF 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Panattoni Development Attn. John Mehigan 18111 Von Karman, Swie 500 Irvine, CA 92612 5. General Plan Designation: Industrial 6. Zoning: Industrial Park District, Subarea 7 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The protect site is located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue. Vegetation on the site has recently been removed because of the grading-related actiwties. The property is part of a larger existing commercial/industrial complex located directly to the east and south that is "anchored" by a Lowe's home improvement store and several businesses on mdroidual "pads" including several restaurants (Islands and Farmer Boys) and Union Bank of California Directly to the south is a large industrial warehouse budding of about 60,000 square feet The • parcels immediately to the west and north across Foothill Boulevard are undeveloped 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Ciwc Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Mike Smith Assistant Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: EIR - Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG - Reactroe Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model • ~- /S Initial Study for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17426 Clty of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages ()Aesthetics ()Agricultural Resources ()Air Quality ()Biological Resources ()Cultural Resources ()Geology 8 Soils ()Hazards & Waste Materials ()Hydrology & Water Quality ()Land Use & Planning ()Mineral Resources ()Noise ()Population & Housing ()Public Services ()Recreation () Transportation/Traffic ()Utilities & Service Systems ()Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (/) I find that although the proposed protect because all potentially significant effects 1) NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuan mitigated pursuant to that earlier EI mrtgahon measures that are imposed ~ Prepared By Reviewed By could have a significant effect on the environment, have been analyzed adequately m an earlier EIR or p licable standards, and 2) have been avoided or ~JEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or fie propo d protect, nothing further req fired Date ~ Csp i Date Z /~~/v • • 13-1 ~ Initial Study for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17426 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 • EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed m the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (x) General Plan EIR (Certified October 2000) (x) Master Environmental Assessment for the 2000 General Plan Update (Certified October 2000) (x) Development Review DRC99-11 Mitigated Negative Declaration (Adopted Apnl 1999) (x) Development Review DRC99-11 Mitigation Monitoring Program (Adopted June 2000) (x) Development Review DRC99-11MOD Negative Declaration (Adopted February 2002) • (x) SUBTPM15630 Negative Declaration (Adopted February 2002) (x) Retail Portion of the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Site Speafic Traffic Analysis, RKJK & Assoaates Inc ,May 2000 (Adopted February 2000) • ~-i n RESOLUTION NO 06-13 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17426, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE AN EXISTING PARCEL OF 5 31 ACRES INTO 4 PARCELS IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSAL TO CONSTRUCT A COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE COMPLEX COMPRISED OF THREE BUILDINGS WITH A COMBINED FLOOR AREA OF ABOUT 42,221 SQUARE FEET, PLUS A FOURTH BUILDING OF ABOUT 7,200 SQUARE FEET TO BE DEVELOPED BY OTHERS, ON A VACANT PARCEL OF 5 31 ACRES IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT, SUBAREA 7, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND MILLIKEN AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0229-011-69 AND 0208-961-05 A Recitals 1 Panatonni Development Company, LLC filed an application forthe approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17426, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17426 request ~s referred to as "the application " 2 On the 8th day of March 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date _ • 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on March 8, 2006, including written and oral staff reports and public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to a parcel located in the Industrial Park District, Subarea 7, at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue, with a east to west dimension of about 390 feet and a north to south dimension of about 630 feet, and b The application proposes the subdivision of one parcel of about 231,000 square feet (5 31 acres) into four parcels of 34,267 square feet (Parcel 1), 63,785 square feet (Parcel 2), 50,847 square feet (Parcel 3), and 82,666 square feet (Parcel 4), and c The application is in conjunction with the development of 3 commeraal/office buildings and a restaurant (previously approved Development Review DRC2004-01125 and • Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00764), with a combined floor area of about 50,000 square feet that is currently under construction, and ~3-l g PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-13 SUBTPM17426 - PANATTONI DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC March 8, 2006 Page 2 d The proposed Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17426 does not affect the Master Plan site layout, the plotting of the buildings, the distribution or number of parking stalls for each building, or the architecture of the buildings, and e The property to the north of the subtect site is vacant, the property to the southwest is a warehouse distribution center, the property to the west is vacant, the property to the south is improved with an mdustnal warehouse building, and the properties to the east are improved with a commeraal center, and f The subdivision, togetherwith the recommended Conditions ofApproval, meets the development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17426 is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and b The design or improvements of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17426 is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and • c The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and • d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and e Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17426 is not likely to cause serous public health problems, and f The design of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17426 wdl not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4 The Planning Commission previously approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration on April 28, 1999, forthe 140-acre Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan, ofwhich this site is a part Furthermore, the Planning Commission previously issued a Negative Declaration for the update of the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan and Parcel Map SUBTPM15630 on February 13, 2005, of which this site is a part There have been no substantial changes in the area to warrant furtherenvironmental review The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been adopted, no further environmental review is regwred for subsequent projects within the scope of the Mitigated Negative Declaration The proposed development is within the scope of the pnor Mitigated Negative Declaration and Negative Declaration, as the site was always planned for development with a development of this type and the size and scope have not changed Accordingly, no further environmental review is necessary Based upon the facts and information contained m the prior Mitigated Negative Declaration and Negative Declaration, together with wntten and oral staff reports, the Planning Commission finds that there are no substantial changes in the protect or the site and its surrounding conditions that • would require revision to the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration or Negative Declaration All ~-~.~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-13 SUBTPM17426 - PANATTONI DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC ' March 8, 2006 Page 3 environmental mitigation measures from the previously approved and updated Master Plan and parcel map shall apply to this protect 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) Approval is for the subdivision of one parcel into four parcels of 34,267 square feet (Parcel 1), 63,785 square feet (Parcel 2), 50,847 square feet (Parcel 3), and 82,666 square feet (Parcel 4) 2) Shared access, parking, and maintenance shall be incorporated in the protect Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CCBRs) 3) All pertinent conditions of approval for Development Review DRC2004-01125 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00764 shall apply as adopted by Planning Commission Resolution No 05-81 and 06-01, respectively Enoineerina Department 1) Install Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements in accordance with City "Mayor Divided Arterial" standards including a) Provide activity center sidewalk treatment, streetlights, and street trees in accordance with the Foothill Boulevard Distracts Chapter of the Development Code and the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement b) Protect the existing traffic signal equipment, signing, striping and all other Public improvements along Foothill Boulevard, or repair as required by the City Engineer 2) Provide a shared access drive approach at or near the west property line on Foothill Boulevard The minimum width for a commercial drive approach is 35 feet a) The proposed drive approach is shown partially off-site, which will regwre permission from the adtacent property owner If the developer is unable to obtain the necessary easements, this driveway will need to be redesigned with its full width on-site and the Site Plan revised accordingly b) The Traffic Engineer shall approve any relocation of the existing streetlight in the vicinity of the proposed drive approach The • streetlights should align across Foothill Boulevard Install Foothill Boulevard decorative streetlights g ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-13 SUBTPM174'26 - PANATTONI DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC March 8, 2006 Page 4 c) The proposed drive approach should not interfere with the existing 90-foot taper for the eastbound right-turn lane onto southbound Milliken Avenue d) Provide aright-tum deceleration lane for the drive approach, separate from the intersection right turn lane If the existing rights-of-way to the west are not suffiaent and the adjacent property owner is unwilling to dedicate additional rights-of-way, the developer shall deposit cash in lieu of construction for its future installation e) The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the cost of the permanent off-site right-tum lane improvements on Foothill Boulevard from future development of the adjacent west property If the developer fads to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate 3) Milliken Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Mayor Divided Arterial" standards including a) Protect the existing curb and gutter, dnve approach and streetlights or replace/repair as required by the City Engineer b) Provide actmty center sidewalk treatment and street trees in accordance with the Foothill Boulevard Districts Chapter 17 32 of the Development Code and the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan (see previously provided Street Tree Regwrement Form) On Milliken Avenue, the activity center shall extend to the first driveway south of Foothill Boulevard The driveway approaches to Milliken Avenue are to be in accordance with City Standard The minimum width for a commercial dnve approach is 35 feet, measured at the right-of-way The sidewalk shall cross the drive approach at the 0" inch curb face per City standard c) Extend the existing southbound bus bay and combine with right-turn lane for proposed dnve approach on Milliken Avenue Dedicate an additional right-of-way at least 7-feet wide measured from curb face along the right-turn lane, and provide sidewalk easements as necessary to encompass the activity center and curvilinear sidewalk along portion(s) of Milliken Avenue beyond the activity center limit d) Protect the existing traffic signing and striping along Milliken Avenue or repair as required by the City Engineer e) Protect the existing traffic signal equipment in Milliken Avenue f) Protect existing R-26(s) signs or replace as required • ~ ~1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-13 SUBTPM17426 - PANATTONI DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC • March 8, 2006 Page 5 g) Restripe Milliken Avenue for 4 south bound through lanes separate from the bus bay/right-turn lane for the two project driveways 4) All driveways shall have drive approaches, not cross gutters and access ramps The sidewalks shall cross the drive approaches at the 0" curb face 5) No new private storm drain lateral across Milliken Avenue Redesign the on-site private storm dram to utilize the existing facilities on the west side of Milliken Avenue The on-site grading and private storm drain improvements shall tie into the existing catch basins north of Century Court or be designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 6) An in-lieu fee for one-fourth the cost of constructing special pavers within the Foothill Boulevard/Milliken Avenue intersection shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of Building Permits The fee amount shall be based on the square footage of the intersection 7) Provide sidewalk easements to encompass all activity center treatments and sidewalks that cross the drive approaches outside existing rights-of-way The sidewalk easements between the two drive approaches on Milliken Avenue shall be sufficient to allow curvilinear sidewalk 8) The parkways shall slope at 2 percent from top of curb to 1/2 foot beyond the right-of-way along all street frontages Join to the on-site grades beyond the right-of-way with maximum 21 slope The sidewalks shall cross the drive approaches at the 0" curb face The driveway accent paving on-site shall not extend into the public right-of-way 9) No new median openings will be allowed in Milliken Avenue or Foothill Boulevard 10) Reference Parcel Map 15295 for vehicular ingress/egress rights on Parcel 1 Prepare the legal documents to rewse the vehicular access rights to vacate the non-vehicular access to Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue for the proposed new drive approaches 11) Prepare or amend the existing Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) as needed to preserve the shared access, maintenance, and surface drainage agreements with the property to the south Provide a completed copy to the City Engineering prior to obtaining Building Permits • a) Maintenance of Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be addressed in the protect CC&Rs ~-~°`~' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-13 SUBTPM17426 - PANATTONI DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC March 8, 2006 Page 6 • Environmental Mitigation 1) The applicant shall implement all pertinent mitigation measures adopted in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan (DR99-11) adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga m April of 1999 and Modification to the Master Plan (DRCDR99-11 MOD) and Parcel Map (SUBTPM15630) adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga m February of 2002 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF MARCH 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plamm~g Commission held on the 8th day of March 2006, by the following vote-to-wit• AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~ a3 •i COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17426 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICANT: PANATONI DEVELOPMENT CO , LLC LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND MILLIKEN AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: .A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the attemative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition B. Time Limits This tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is fled with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or pnor to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first Completion Date ~~- _/~_ _J/- ~-~- SC-1-05 ~ ~ a~ Protect No SUBTPM17426 Comoletion Date 3 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bwlding permit issuance • D. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/~_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or pnor final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdiwsion. 2 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for _/_/_ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 3 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in _/~_ the requved landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department 4 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering _/_/ sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is requred along Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue 5 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the ~_~_ perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 1 • 0, APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-27 FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE. ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) E. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/~- a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceding and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Protect Number (i e , SUBTPM17426) clearly identified on the outside of all plans h Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls . SC-1-O5 ~~ Protect No SUBTPM77426 Completion Date 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and °wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal . 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and W orkers' Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the Ctty pnor to permit issuance 4 Business shall not open for operation pnor to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued bythe _/~_ Building and Safety Department F. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be ~~ marked with the prolect file number (i e , SUBTPM17426) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Pnor to issuance of bwldmg permits for a new residential prolect or major addition, the applicant ~~_ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance 3 The Building and Safety Official shall provide the street addresses after tracUparcel map ~~_ recordation and prior to issuance of bwldmg permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8.00 p m. and 6 30 a m Monday ~~_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public ~~_ • counter) G. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Bwiding Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 The prolect shall be designed to comply with the 2001 California Bwlding Codes (CBC), the _/~_ California Fire Code, and with RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39 3 Provide compliance with the California Bwlding Code for required occupancy separations ~~_ 4 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, to accordance with CBC ~~_ Section 1505 5 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the requred fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A ~ / 6 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A ~~- 7 Provtde the required restroom facilities per the CBC Appendix Chapter 29 ~~- 8 All exit components must comply with the requrements of CBC Chapter 10 (adjoining rooms, _I_/ rated corridors, door swings, separation of exits, etc ) 9 At the time of tenant improvement plan check submittal (for construction) additional requirements ~~_ may be regwred 10 Clearly indicate on the plans compliance with ADA requirements for the disabled _/_/- • 11 A registered architect must sign and stamp the plans SC-1-05 D>~~P Protect No SUBTPM17426 Comoletion Date H. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with Califomia Building Code, Crty Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4. At the time of tenant improvement plan check submittal (for construction), additional requirements may be required 5 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 6 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for ali new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer Note on title sheet that tenant improvement plans must be submitted for plan check and be approved prior to construction. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department if you have any questions about the procedure at (909) 477-2710 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Dedication and Vehicular Access Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or pnor to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs J. Street Improvements 1. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC. Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Foothill Boulevard X X X X X X Mlliiken Avenue X X X X X X Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item Improvement Plans and Construction , a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights -J-/~ _/~_ ~~- ~~- ~_~. ~~_ • ~~- ~~_ ~-J- _/-/ SC-1-OS 4 -~~ Protect No SUBTPM77426 ComoleUOn Date on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be . posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a _/_/_ construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits requred c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduct, and _/~_ interconnect condut shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction ~~_, protect along mafor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City ~~_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times wcth ~~ adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded • upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the Cary Engineer. g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drams shall be _/~_ installed to City Standards, except for single faintly residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. J~_ 3 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in ~~_ accordance with the City's street tree program SC-1-05 5 ~a~ Protect No SUBTPM17426 Completion Date Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional Information, contact the Project Engineer Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size aty Foothill Boulevard Lagestroemia indite Crape Myrtle Hybrid - 3' 15' O C 24' Activity Centers 'Muskogee' Lavender Triangular Box Fill spacing in Foothill Boulevard Prunus bhreiana NCN 3' 20' O C 15 Gel Non Actrviry Centers Informal Accent Tree Groupings Not more than 25% of Total Frontage Trees Non Activity Centers Platanus racemosa California Sycamore 6' 35' O C 15 Gal Informal Groupings Non Activity Centers Platanus acerifolia London Plane Tree 8' 30'O C 15 Gal Infortnel Groupings Milliken Avenue Liquidambar American Sweet Gum 8' 25' O C Mm 15 Gal South of Foothill sryreciflua Informal Boulevad 30% groupings Brachychiton Bottle Tree 8' 25' O C Min 15 Gal populneus 70% Informal Groupings Construction Notes for Street Trees FIII in tree quantity on plans 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only 5. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have Imes of sight plotted as required K. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Clty Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan Milliken Avenue SC-1-05 ~ ~ _/-/. • `r u -~~- _/~- • ~G Protect No SUBTPM77426 Completion Date L. Drainage and Flood Control • 1 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas M. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley W ater District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliancefrom the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water distract within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. N. General Requirements and Approvals • 1 An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, for 1) South Milliken Avenue driveway and 2) Foothill Boulevard driveway A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable rf at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the Ciry. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first bwlding permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED ~-~ ~-/- -l ~- -J ~- ~~ ~~- ~~_ SC-1-os ~-3a ,~ ~,wy~ :~ , Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection ,= District • - ~. ~---~ Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS January 10, 2006 Gateway I SWC Foothill & Milliken SUBTPM17426 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at htto.//www ci rancho-Cucamonga ca us/firehndex htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section. Search by article, the preceding number of the standard refers to the article Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding stardard. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants. The following provides design guidelines for the • spacing and location of fire hydrants: a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commeraal/industrial protects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet. b. Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industnal or residential protect from the public roadways u. At intersections. ui. On the nght side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire Distract ' v A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building. c If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided d. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of requred fire flow or fraction thereof. • "~~ FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The requred fire flow for this protect is will be based on the most demanding bulding This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire Distract Ordinances 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provde the required fire flow subject to Fire Distract review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Firewater plans are required for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until public fire protection water plans are approved. 4 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 Pnor to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire spnnkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, speafications and calculations for the fire spnnkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems • Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract Ordinance 15, the 2001 Califorma Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in. 1 Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet 2 Assembly and Educational Occupancy Buildings 3 "All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (see Fire Access) " 4 When required fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure. 5 When buildings do not meet the requrements of the 2001 Californa Bulding Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard 9-7 6 When any applicable code or standard regwres the structure to be spnnklered. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or standards) requires an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system. Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Building Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code. 2. Pnor to any removal, remodel, modification and/or additions to the bwlding or swte's fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a building permit must be . obtained. Plans and speafications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6. 2 ~-30~. 3 Based on the number of sprinkler heads; the sprinkler system is requred to monitored by a listed central station fire alarm system. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Lanes Standard 9-7 1. Location of Access All portions of the structures 15' story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b. The maximum inside tum radws shall be 20-feet c. The minimum outside tum radius shall be 46-feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. I~ At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on • each side g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) Trees and shrubs planted adfacent to the fire lane shall be kept trammed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 3 Access Doorways• Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows. a In bwldings without high-pled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Budding Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b In bwldings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or mafor fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all regwred openings 4. Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire • apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings 3 ~,-33 5 Commercial/Industrial Gates Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2. The following design requirements apply: a Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are requred to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. c Gates may be motorized or manual d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet e Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20.00 f Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second g The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be egwpped with a manual override device and afail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mecharncal malfunction h Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. • i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex i If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations 6. Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 7. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternatroe Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review 8. Roof Access: There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75' above the level of the fire access road. a This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder. . b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in bwldings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access 4 c The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration d Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e Where the entire roof access is restncted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is requred. f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard 9-9 Appendix A and drawings 9-9a and 9-9b. h. A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly assoaated with the business operations and/or budding construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required pnor to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be regwred for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the iudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property • Battery Systems • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Compressed Gases • Public Assembly • Cryogerncs • Dry Cleaning Plants • Refngeration Systems • Repair Garages • Flammable and Combustible Ligwds • Spraying or Dipping Operations • Hazardous Materials • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • Liquefied Petroleum Gases • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino r1 U The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards. Contact the San • Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materals Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and 5 assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga • 1 If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Pfan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from isswng a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure regwrements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be regwred if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility. 2. Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is regwred to submit a Plan, is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions. The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Budding, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FSC-13 Alternate Method Application • Fue Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee FCS-14 Map Recordation RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are regwred on this protect The protect appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided. The reaprocal agreement is regwred to be recorded between property owners and the Fire Distract. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office Reciprocal access agreement -Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and anon-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subfect property The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire Distract. Reciprocal water covenant -Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire Distract for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general). The covenant • shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District 6 ~ 3G~ FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1 is requred prior to the issuance of grading or bwlding permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections 2 All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radds of the protect Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure • Standard 9-8. 4 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 5 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 6 Fire Flow. A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". n U IJ"~~ PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: • 1 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or drroeway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2. Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the regwred fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler morntoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire spunkier system (subfect to the release of power) 5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted • and/or equipment is placed in service 6 Fire Alarm System• Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7 Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services 8 Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services 9 The CC&R's, the reaprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the regwred annual inspections and the maintenance of all regwred fire access roadways. 10 Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commeraal/industnal and multi-family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non- illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be regwred on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks inmulti-tenant commercial and industrial buildings. The suite designation • numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all swtes. X3-38 11 Hazardous Materials Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Matenals/Emergency Response and Enforcement Droision The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services 12 Confidential Business Occupancy Information• The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information° form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject budding or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 13. Mapping Site Plan: Pnor to the issuance of a 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance wit by the applicant to reflect the actual location regwred m the standard. The site plan must Inspector Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 ~/z" x 11" or h RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised of all devices and budding features as be reviewed and accepted by the Fire • • L J 9 g-3~ T H E C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE. March B, 2006 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner BY- Michael Diaz, Senior Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2005-01083 - SAHGA GROUP - A request to amend Table 17 32 030 -Use Regulations for Foothill Boulevard Districts of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, adding Thnft Stores as a conditionally permitted use in Subarea 2 of the Community Commercial Distracts, located along Foothill Boulevard between Cucamonga Creek and Hellman Avenue. ABSTRACT The Foothill Boulevard Speafic Plan (now known as Chapter 17.32 of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code) does not list thrift shops as a permitted or conditionally permitted use in any of the Foothill Boulevard Districts Approval of the proposed code amendment would modify Table 17.32.030 -Use Regulations for Foothill Boulevard Distracts to allow theft shops as a conditionally permitted use on all properties zoned Community Commercal within Subarea 2 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts (Exhibit A) between Cucamonga Creek and Hellman Avenue. BACKGROUND. When the Foothill Boulevard Speafic Plan was drafted and approved, thrift stores as a land use were not included in Table 17 32 030 -Use Regulations for Foothill Boulevard Distracts because of concerns that theft shops were not consistent with the efforts to improve the appearance and use of properties along Foothill Boulevard In 2000, the City Counal adopted Ordinance No 619 which established new definitions for "Thnft Store," "Second-Hand Store," "Antique Shop," and "Pawn Shop° to help clarify the differences between these uses and determine where these uses could be located within the City. Presently, thrift stores are only allowed with a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) in the Neighborhood Commercial and General Commercial Zones In 2003, Goodwill Industnes submitted a CUP application for a theft store within the Albertson's Shopping Center at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Base Line Road The proposal met with public opposition and was eventually denied by the Planning Commission. Item C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT - DRC2005-01083 March 8, 2006 • Page 2 On January 31, 2006, the applicant requested that the Planning Commission initiate a code amendment to add thrift stores as a conditionally permitted use within Subarea 2 of the Foothill Distracts. The Planning Commission approved the request to initiate the code amendment. ANALYSIS A. Definition: A theft store is defined as °A retail store offering used clothing, furniture, household appliances, and similar merchandise which is in good repair, provided: (1) All clothes are displayed on racks, folded on shelves or tables, or in some recognized fashion as distinguished from being displayed in heaps or piles, (2) No merchandise shall be accepted on consignment, and (3) Merchandise regwres no cleaning, repair, assembly, or refurbishment before it can be worn or put to normal use. The mafonty of merchandise offered for sale shall be donated; however, all collection and storage shall be conducted inside the building" (adopted and provided for in Section 17 02.140 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code) B Proposed Amendment• Table 17.32 030 -Use Regulations for Foothill Boulevard Distracts of the Development Code will be amended to add theft stores as a potential land use on Community Commercial zoned property within Subarea 2 of the Foothill Boulevard Distracts, subfect to the approval of a CUP. C Affected Properties: Approximately 37 properties are located within Subarea 2 of the • Foothill Boulevard Distracts, 25 of which are zoned Community Commeraal. If approved, the proposed code amendment would allow the applicant's client to submit a CUP application for a Goodwill Industries Thrrft Store to be located in the commercal center located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue. D Proposed Review Process Staff recommends that theft stores (as defined by the Development Code) be subject to the approval of a CUP The CUP regwremenUprocess is consistent with zoning regulations regulating theft stores in other parts of the City. A CUP regwrement allows the City to review applications on a case by case basis and determine if a theft store proposal will be appropriate for the proposed location. Moreover, the CUP process provides for public notice and hearing, the imposition of a suffiaent number of operating conditions to ensure that the use is compatible with other surrounding properties and/or uses, and the ability to revoke approval should the thrft store be operated in a manner that is contrary with the conditions of approval ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT• The proposed minor code amendment to an existing zoning ordinance is determined not to be a project as defined in Section 15378(a)(1) of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended The Code amendment which adds thrift stores to the list of potential retail uses in a commercially zoned area and will not have a direct or indirect physical change in the environment CORRESPONDENCE This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper and notices were mailed to all affected property owners (those properties with Community Commeraal zoning in Subarea 2). (~-~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT - DRC2005-01083 • March 8, 2006 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt and forward the attached Resolution of Approval to the City Council for final action Re tfully sub olema Acting City Planner DC MD/ge Attachment Exhibit A -Map of Foothill Distract Subarea 2 Exhibit B -Land Use Definitions Draft Resolution Recommending Approval for DRC2005-01083 Draft City Council Ordinance Approving Code Amendment • C-3 m a 00 D J . _ ~~ \ SUBAREA 2 ~,_ \, _ San Bernardino Rd. / ~v a ~ ~ Q9~ b d d ~ ~ d ~~ `~' SC ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ a d ~ ~'] ,, - a ~ ~`~ y, »» Foothill Blvd. ~ -;, ~ . ~, ~~ ~ ° p corn 'CC.~Q~ a aoQ ~°^ ~ as ~°°°~°0 a ~ Mf~° pp ~ d Do~~ V~ p~~~t ° ~ o Q p0 c ~Q ~ on ~° p ~ ~ o~ Boo ~Q n0 ~~a~oiJoC._..~Do~aLL~ p~~oooo ~ LEGEND RESIDENTIAL lR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LMR LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL MR MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL MHR MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL • COMMERCIAL OFFICE PUBLIC SC SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL MU MDCED USE U UTILITY CC COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL O OFFICE P PUBLIC c m E d RRO REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL CO COMMEitCIAUOi~FICE ~~ MASTER PLAN AREA INDUSTRIAL U LIGHT INDUSTRIAL • Ordinance No 619 Page 4 • ,., - DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 99-0~ , Section 17.0? /~0 - Definrnons, should be amended to odd the following land use definrnons :. - _ , ` '~ Thrift, Store - A retail store offenng used clothing; furndure, household appliances, and , similar merchandise which is in good repair, provided.-(9) alLdothes are displayed on ~' racks, folded on shelves or tables, or in some organized fashion; as~distmgwshed from - '- being- displayed "•iri heaps• or piles, (2) no- merchandise , shall ~ be' accepted' on ,_ consignment;:, and ; (3) 'merchandise, requires no cleaning; .repair, ,assembly, or refurbishment before rt can be worn or put to normal use The malonty of merchandise -' offered for sale shall, be donated; however, all collection and storage _shall be conducted- - ' inside~the bwliiing:;y ~' - ~, ~ - :"Second-hand~Store -`A-retail store-or resaler offenng used clothes;-.fumrture, household• appliances, and similar merchandise, prowded;,(1) clothes may be displayed in heaps or ` ~_pdes, as distinguished from racks or folded on shelves or tables; (2)'merchandise' may- - . be~accepted.on sale for consignment; and (3) offers used materials or,goods for sale, - -' that requires cleaning, repay, assembly or refurbishment before dean be worn or put to _ normal use. Merchandise may be donated, however, all collection and storage shall be ' - conducted inside the building; .,; . - - _ _ ~ _ _ _ s ti tie` Sho -- A retail store offenng antique clothes, fewelry, furniture, household pliances, pnnted,matenals, art, and similar merchandise, provided not more than 10 percent of the merchandise or 10 percent of the floor area is devoted to the sale of collectibles, new merchandise, or simulated antiques - •"Antique" shall mean anything very old, or the like, made at a much earlier period than the present, generally more than 50~ years ago, and which, because of age, rarity, or historical significance, has 'a ~'monetary,value,greater than the original value: ~ ~ ' .,, ,_ ., PawnyShop - A pawnbroker or other shop engaged iii the business of receiving tangible personal property; new ,or used, in pledge as security for a loan Tangible personal property does not include coins, monetized bullion, or commercial ingots of preaous :_ ., ,- ~~ metals`'s,' ~ H - Seclron ` 17.10 030 -Use Regrrlatrons, Toble 17.10 030 `Use Regrrlarrorrs fur Conunercral/Ojjce Districts,shorildbeanrendcdasjollows• ` Use Office Professional Zone Neighborhood Commercial Zone ~ General Commercial Zone Antique Shop - Permitted Permitted Pawn Shops - CUP Second-hand Store - CUP P Thrift Store - P ,EXHIBIT B ~-s • RESOLUTION NO 06-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2005-01083, AMENDING TABLE 17.32 030 -USE REGULATIONS FOR FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE, ADDING THRIFT STORES AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE IN SUBAREA 2 OF THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS, LOCATED ALONG FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN CUCAMONA CREEK AND HELLMAN AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Rentals 1 The Sahga Group fled an application for Development Code Amendment DRC2006-01083, requesting the Planning Commission to initiate a code amendment for the protect described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2 On the 25th day of January 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga agreed to initiate the requested code amendment for consideration at a future public hearing. • 3 On the 8th day of March 2006, the Plannmg Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby spenfically finds as follows: a The amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code is necessary to add theft stores to the list of potential land uses for consideration within the Community Commernal Zone of Subarea 2 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts b The amendment modifies Table 17 32.030 -Use Regulations for Foothill Boulevard Districts of the Development Code, to add theft stores as a potential land use on Community Commeraal zoned property within Subarea 2 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). • c The Rancho Cucamonga Development Code defines a thrift shop as °A retail store offering used clothing, furniture, household appliances, and similar merchandise which is in good repair, provided (1) All clothes are displayed on racks, folded on shelves or tables, or C-(~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-14 DRC2005-01083 - SAGHA GROUP March 8, 2006 Page 2 in some recognized fashion as distinguished from being displayed in heaps or piles, (2) No merchandise shall be accepted on consignment, and (3) Merchandise requires no cleaning, repair, assembly, or refurbishment before it can be worn or put to normal use The matonty of merchandise offered for sale shall be donated, however, all collection and storage shall be conducted inside the bwlding" (adopted and provided for m Section 17 02.140 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code). d The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a That the proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, rn a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, and b That the proposed amendment promotes the goals and obtectives of the Development Code, and c. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially mfunous to properties or improvements m the vicinity; and u d That the proposed amendment is m conformance with the City's General Plan. • 4 This Commission hereby finds that the proposed amendment has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder. The City Counal finds that this Ordinance and said Development Code amendment is not a protect as defined m Section 15378(a)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines in that the adding of theft stores to the list of potential retail uses m a commeraally zoned area will not have a direct or indirect physical change in the environment 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2005-01083 as shown m the Ordinance attached hereto 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF MARCH 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY. Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST• • Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary C ~J • • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-14 DRC2005-01083 - SAGHA GROUP March 8, 2006 Page 3 Planning Commission of the City of Rancho ng Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, mission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a n held on the 8th day of March 2006, by the following vote-to-wit. I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoi passed, and adopted by the Planning Com regular meeting of the Planning Commissio AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES' COMMISSIONERS' ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS. C ~V • ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2005-01083, A REQUEST TO AMEND TABLE 17.32 030 -USE REGULATIONS FOR FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE, ADDING THRIFT STORES AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE IN SUBAREA 2 OF THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS, LOCATED ALONG FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN CUCAMONGA CREEK AND HELLMAN AVENUE A Recitals. 1 The Sahga Group filed an application for Development Code Amendment DRC2006-01083, requesting the Planning Commission initiate a code amendment for the protect descnbed in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subfect Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 25th day of January 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga agreed to initiate the requested code amendment for consideration at a future public hearing • 3 On March 8, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing concerning the Development Code Amendment contained herein, as regwred by law At the conclusion of the heanng, the Planning Commission recommended adoption of said amendment 4 On , 2006, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing concerning the Development Code Amendments contained herein as required by law. 5. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Councl hereby ordains as follows Section 1 This Councl hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Ordinance, are true and correct. Section 2 Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Councl dunng the above-referenced public heanng, including written staff reports, the minutes of the above-referenced Planning Commission meetings and the contents of Planning Commission Resolution No 06-14, this Councl hereby specifically finds as follows • a. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the City's Development Code and add Thrift Stores to the category of uses allowed within Community Commeraal Zone of Cq CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2005-01083 - SAHGA GROUP Page 2 Subarea 2 of the Foothill Boulevard Distracts, subfect to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit b Section 17 02 140 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code defines a theft store as °A retail store offering used clothing, furniture, household appliances, and similar merchandise which is in good repair, provided that: (1) All clothes are displayed on racks, folded on shelves or tables, or in some recognized fashion as distingwshed from being displayed in heaps or piles, (2) No merchandise shall be accepted on consignment; and (3) Merchandise requires no cleaning, repair, assembly, or refurbishment before it can be worn or put to normal use. The malonty of merchandise offered for sale shall be donated; however, all collection and storage shall be conducted inside the building.° Section 3. The provisions of this Ordinance and the Development Code Amendments contained herein have been reviewed and considered by the City Council in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder The City Council fords that this Ordinance and said Development Code Amendment is not a protect as defined in Section 15378(a)(1) of the CEQA Gwdelines in that the adding of theft stores to the list of potential retail uses in a commercially zoned area will not have a direct or indirect physical change in the environment, therefore, the subject amendment identified in this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the Califorrna Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Gudelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 21080.17 of the Public Resource Code and Section 15282(1) of Division 6 Title 14 of the Califorrna Code of Regulation Section 4 Table 17 08 030 -Use Regulations for Foothill Boulevard Districts - of Title 17 • of the Rancho Cucamonga Murnapal Code is hereby amended, in words and figures, as shown in the attached Exhibit A to allow thrift stores in the Community Commercial Zone of Subarea 2 of the Foothill Boulevard Distracts, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit Section 5 Severability. The City Council declares that should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect Section 6 The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. u [n ~ • EXHIBIT A Excerpt from Table 17.32.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Depicting Where Thrift Stores (Highlighted) Will Be Added as a Conditionally Permitted Use in the Community Commercial (CC) Zoning District within Subarea 2 of Foothill Boulevard Districts. Use Regulations for Foothill Boulevard Districts Summary Table of Permitted (P) and Conditionally Permitted (C) Uses RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES Subar ea One Subarea 2 Subarea Three Sub area Four Continued MU O MR P SC CC O MR Maa SC CC CO u+a MR U MU C C R~ MR LI O Public and Private Clubs and Lodges, C including YMCA, YWCA, end similar Youth Grou Uses P P P P P P P P Record and Ta a Stores C Recreational Vehicle Stora a Yards Restaurants sit down a) wrth entertainment and/or cocktail C C C C C C C C C C bar loun e g , b) inadental serving of beer and P P P P wine (wnhout a cocktail lounge, P P P P P P P P entertainment or dancing) bar , I c) caf4, hmiled to 20 seats (including P P P P P P P outdoor seating) P P P P P t Food WRh dove-thru d F C C C C C C ) as P P P Wilhout drive-thru P P P P P P P P P P P Shoe Stores and Re air Sho P P P S cial Retail P P P P P P SDOrtina Goods Stores a) Specialty, Backpacking, Tennis, P P P Sknng, Mountaineering, Fishing, P P P P P etc b) General, encompassing a vanery P p p P P of s rts ui ment P P P Su ennarkets P P P P P Swimmin Pool Services and Su lies P P P P Tailor Sho P P P P P Thrift Stores C - To Stores P P P P P P P Variety Department Stores, Junior C C p C p P P De artment Stores mestic d V t o e enna a) Non-boarding P C P C P P P P C C C C C C b BoaNin Watch and Clock Re it Stores C P P P P P P P P P Yarda a Goods Stores P P P P P • e J' r,~ T H E C I T Y O F R A N C U O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE March 8, 2006 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner 8Y Douglas Fenn, MPA, Associate Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP-SUBTT17783 -CHARLES JOSEPH AND ASSOCIATES - A proposed subdivision to convert 589 existing residential apartments into 589 residential condominiums within the Meritage and Chambray protects on 24 6 acres of land in the Mixed-Use/High Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Arbors Village of the Victoria Community Plan, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Foothill Boulevard APN 0227-201- 38, 41, and 42 Related File Development Review DRC2003-00337 This action includes approval of an Addendum pursuant to the California Quality Act Section 15164, to the previously adopted Negative Declaration that was adopted by the Planning Commission on December 10, 2003 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION• A North - Mixed Use/Medwm Residential (14-24 dwelling units per South - Mixed Use/High (24-30 dwelling units per acre) East - Mixed Use/Victoria Gardens lifestyle center West - Southern California Edison (SCE)/Utility Corridor B. General Plan Designations Protect Site -Mixed Use North - Mixed Use South - Mixed Use East - Mixed Use West - Flood Control/Utility Corridor C Site Characteristics. The protect site has recently been developed with multi-family bwldings • Item D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT17783 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES March 8, 2006 Page 2 • ANALYSIS A General The applicants propose the condo conversion of existing 589 multiple-family units into condominium "for sale" units Because of the accelerating housing prices m our city and the surrounding communities, this proposed subdivision would be beneficial to the community and in the sport of the affordable housing goals of the City's General Plan housing element Staff believes that this wili be an opportunity for first-time homebuyers to have the option of owning a residence The applicant has given notice to prospective and current tenants a Notice of Intent to convert the units to Condominiums, in accordance with the State Subdivision Map Act and City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code section 27 22 030 and 040 B Desion and Gradino Committees The affiliated Committees recommended approval at their meetings on December 6, 2005 The project was a consent calendar "walk on" item for the Design Review Committee The Committees determined that, with the recommended standard and speaal conditions of approval, the project is consistent with the City's standards and ordinances C Environmental Assessment The previous findings analyzed the potential environmental impacts of Development Reviews DRC2003-0336 and 337 The determination by the Planning Commission on December 10, 2003, declared that Development Reviews DRC2003-00336 and 337 were within the scope of the supplement to the Victona Arbors • Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Cleannghouse No 98041137) that was certified by the City Council on July 7, 1999 CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public heanng m the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract Map SU 783 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions R pebtfully submitted, Dan Coleman Acting City Planner DC DF/Is Attachments Exhibit A -Site Utilization Plan Exhibit B -Tentative Tract Map 17783 Exhibit C -Addendum to the Previous Environmental Action and Findings Exhibit D -Prospective Tenant and Tenant notice of intent to convert to Condominiums • Draft Resolution of Approval with Conditions for Tentative Tract SUBTT17783 Da ~~~«s,~~ g Q E~ J U ~~ ~~ ~ .-~ ,- ~ -' ~~ a~ ~ F ' ' ~ ~ / _ / ~ - ° - ,., l I _-1-• / Y I .'ifr~-~ ~'_ .__ I q ~3i ~ ~ - .,,r^--.,~G_ J e tr--= - ~rB~+ ~ 1111 I_11's~i __ ~ ~ '_- ~ j ~_ <<~~,' , ICI ,~ ~, t- ° _ ' ~ _ _" f~_w, iimn a-.~ - ;~, _- _ ~ ___ _ ~ _ ___~ \ ' \\\ ~6 yy \ 3 ~\ ~~ i5 '> -r -- ~~ ~' . ., ~. _ 1 _ ~ __ ~ ~I ~ " \\ Cllr' 'c__ _ _ I I ~ ~ i ~ \\\\ .. -- ~ .I3''~L ~ `, . ~ ~'~ 144 --eF= ~ I _ u - _. - ~ L~~~!!{ ~. __ ~~ 'j,i~~,t ,f e..csti / / _g i / ~8 i i i c i i i~ wuEVwo D~ a ~'~'° ~y~ I u~ T J i ~' L -~ ~Za o~ ~ ~ n O~~ N ~ ~a 5' _ ~~~~~ ~ ~1 ~ _ - ~ T - __ ' p ~ 9 ~ ~ 1 N~ '_ ~ ~ l _ ~ .,,.J ~ ~ _ _ _ ~~ F 1 Ii (y..1 P l _ ~ ~ c r, _ _ _ ~ :... ~ y _ C ~ ~ _ K .. _ .--_ - - -4 - -_ - - - VIWISIN ~~ "~ - --15.^-~ - ' ~I~ 1~1 111 1 'i' ~1~ i~l II i ~ ! ~,; iiii ~ - ~~ i t~ I ii~ 1~~ 8 11• ~ 11 1 ,li ' 1 1 :' 11• 111 , :II ' i iilllil ~ ~ ~~i I~ ~~ i 5 i{I i I I I~ Ij •J u I m II i i I i i '~ i ~ i i i -' . _ t , -,=;. _` 8 S~' ~ ~ ~ , I ~ } 1 5 I ~ ~ e. z ~~ r ~ ~ -~ - Ji I ~ _~ 1 ~ ~~ ~~_. r I te.. l , ~ -_-~.._.., I __ ~` _ _ - _- _-_ _ I ~ ~^'t ~I i~ 1 v _ W i ryy. , 3~ 3 a~ ~ ~ I a °I I 1 i i I I i 1 / C~ ADDENDUM TO THE PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION AND FINDINGS PREPARED FOR DRC2003-00336 and 337 IN ORDER TO CONSTITUTE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION FOR SUBTPM17783 L~ Prepared for City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 February 1, 2006 Prepared by Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map 17783 • TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 Purpose 1 2 The Previously Approved Protect(s) 1 3 The Previous Environmental Action 1 4 Actions Subsequent to the Adoption of theEnvuonmental Findings 1 5 Protect Changes Addressed m this Addendum 1 6 Required Findings for Use of an Addendum 2 7 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 2 8 Modified Environmental Checklist Form 3 A Substantral Change rn Prolect Requrnng Malor Revrsron k 3 • en 8 Substantral Change rn Circumstances under which Prolect rs Underta Regwnng Malor Revrsron 3 C New Informatron of Substantial Importance Showing New or Greater Srgnrficant Effects 3 D New Informatron of Substantial Importance Showing Abrlrty to Substantially Reduce Srgnrficant Impacts 3 E Less Than Srgnrficant ImpacUNo Changes or Circumstances and No New Informatron That Would Require the Preparation of a New Review of a Mitigated Negative Declartron or Environmental Impact Report 4 F No Impact - 4 Addendum Pagel February 1, 2006 p'~ Tentative Parcel Map 17783 • ADDENDUM TO THE PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS AND FINDINGS FOR [SUBTPM17783] Purpose This Addendum is prepared to augment the previously adopted environmental findings that were adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on December 10, 2003, for DRC2003-00336 and 337 This Addendum serves as the environmental review of the proposed protect, known generally as the Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17783 (referenced as SUBTPM17783), as regwred pursuantto the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq and the State and local CEQA Gwdelines Pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and the State and local CEQA Gwdelines, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is the Lead Agency and is charged with the responsibility of deciding whether or not to approve the proposed protect SUBTPM17783 As part of the deasion making process, the City is regwred to review and consider the potential environmental effects that could result from the modification of the protect analyzed in the previously adopted findings 2. The Previously Approved Protect(s) Both Development Reviews DRC2003-00336 and 337 were for the development of two adtacent • multi-family protects which total 589 residential units Both of these protects have been recently developed 3 The Previous Environmental Action The previous "findings" analyzed the potential environmental impacts of the Development Review(s) DRC2003-0336 and 337 The determination by the Planning Commission on December 10, 2003, declared that the Development Review(s) DRC2003-00336 and 337 were within the scope of the supplement to the Victoria Arbors Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No 98041137) that was certified by the City Counal on July 7, 1999 4. Actions Subsequent to the Adoption of the Environmental Findings In response to the application, this Addendum to the findings was prepared to consider the impacts associated with the modifications and changes to SUBTPM17783 This Addendum focuses on the changes between the protect as previously evaluated and as approved on December 10, 2003, by the Planning Commission, and the modifications to convert the multi-family residential units into condominiums 5. Protect Changes Addressed m this Addendum As previously stated the protect is the request to convert the existing multi-family units into condominiums, and to be sold as such Specifically, the application now pending would change the protect from what was previously approved in the following ways `.J Addendum reyc~ February 1, 2006 p"~ Tentative Parcel Map 17783 (1) Convert the existing multi-family units into condominwms There will be no physical change to the units, and all amenities are in place for condominium purposes 6. Required Fmdmgs for Use of an Addendum Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines states that an Addendum to an earlier findings Mitigated Negative Declaration or "EIR" shall be prepared if some changes or additions are necessary to the previously adopted document, but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration or "EIR" have occurred Section 15162 of the State CEQA Gwdelines identifies the conditions that require preparation of a subsequent "EIR" A proposed change in a protect will require preparation of a subsequent environmental document if • In performing the regwred analysis and determining that the critena is met for use of an Addendum, this Addendum relies on use of a Modified Environmental Checklist Form, as suggested in Section 15063(d)(3) of the State CEQA Gwdelines Section 8 of this document contains the Modified Environmental Checklist Form and explains the basis for each response to the questions on that Form This Addendum has evaluated each of the changes to the previous protects between the "environmental findings" adopted in 2003 and the version now presented, and measures the impacts of those changes against the checklist of questions presented in Section 8 of this document Based on this analysis and the information contained in this Addendum, there is no evidence that • the proposed protect requires major changes Companson of the previous protectwith the proposed protect, as descnbed in Section 5 of this document, indicates that there are no new significant environmental impacts associated with implementation of the SUBTPM17783 In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the circumstances under which the protect is undertaken have substantially changed and there is no evidence of new or mode severe environmental impacts ansing out of the proposed protect 7. Evaluation of Environmental Impacts As indicated above, the Modified Environmental Checklist Form included in Section 8 of this Addendum was used to identify the potential environmental effects of the proposed protect changes Each protect change was referenced against the standard environmental categones listed in Appendix G of the State CEQA Gwdelines A summary of the proposed protect changes, resulting potential impacts, and the reasons why an Addendum is appropriate in this situation, are set forth below The only change ~s to convert the existing multiple-family units into condominwms • Addendum dye February 1, 2006 p_~ 823308 1 Tentative Parcel Map 17783 8. Modified Environmental Checklist Form The Form, and accompanying evaluation of the responses, of the information and analysis upon which the City of Rancho Cucamonga makes its determination that no subsequent environmental document is requred for the SUBTPM17783 • Aesthetics • Agricultural Resources • Air Quality • Biological Resources • Cultural Resources • Geology/Soils • Hazards and Hazardous Materials • Hydrology/WaterQuality • Land Use Planning • Mineral Resources • Noise • Population/Housing • Public Services • Recreation • TransportationfTraffic • Utilities/Service Systems • Mandatory Findings of Significance There are six possible responses to each of the questions included on the Form A Substantial Change in Pro/ect Regwnng Major Revision This response is used when the protect has changed to such an extent that major revisions of the previous MND or EIR are required due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or an increase in the seventy of the previously identified sigmficant effects B Substantial Change m Circumstances under which Project rs Undertaken Regwnng Major Revision This response is used when the circumstances underwhich the protect is undertaken have changed to such an extent that major revisions of the previous MND or EIR are required because such changes would result in the protect having new sigmficant environmental effects or would substantially increase the seventy of the previously identified significant effects C New Information of Substantial Importance Showing New or Greater S~gnrficant Effects i This response is used when new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous findings were adopted, shows that the protect would have a new sigmficant environmental effector more severe significant effect than identified m the previous MND or EIR D New Information of Substantial Importance Showing Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impacts This response is used when new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous MND or EIR was adopted, shows Addendum February 1, 2006 ~_cj 823308 1 rage s Tentative Parcel Map 17783 (1) The significant environmental effects of the prolect could be substantially reduced through imposition of mitigation measures or alternatwes that although previously found to be infeasible are in fact now feasible, but the prolect proponent declines to adopt them E Less Than Significant ImpacUNo Changes or Circumstances and No New Information That Would Require the Preparation of a New MND or EIR This response is used when (1) the potential impact of the prolect is determined to be below known or measurable thresholds of significance and would not regwre mitigation, or (2) there are no changes in the prolect or circumstances and no new information that would regwre the preparation of a new MND and/or EIR pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and Section 15162 of the State CEQA Gwdelines F No Impact This response is used when the proposed prolect does not have any measurable environmental impact The Form, and accompanying evaluation of the responses, provided the information and analysis upon which the City of Rancho Cucamonga makes its determination that no subsequent environmental document is regwred for SUBTPM17783 n LJ Addendum February 1, 2006 823308 1 -LO Page 4 ~1 LJ New New Information Less than Information Showing Significant Substantial Substantial Showm9 Ability to ImpacUNo Change in Change in New or Reduce. Changes or No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Protect Reqwnng Circumstances Reqwnng Greater Significant but not New tion f I Impact Mator MND Mator MND Effects Eliminate Signifcant orma n Requiring Revisions Revisions than Effects in Preparation Previous previous of an MND MND MND 1 AESTHETICS Would the protect. a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic '~' vista b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock '(' outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual T character or quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare T which would adversely affect day or nighttime views In the area re will be no additional Impacts because the request is to convert the existing multi-family units into condominiums these impacts were considered In the EIR and findings made by the Planning Commission on December 10, However , 2003, at review of the development request for multiple-family units nothing contained in the current proposal of the SUBTPM17783 alters the type or degree of impact that the will have on aesthetics Therefore, the Clty finds A Substantial changes in the protect and protect circumstances resulting in new significant effects or a substantial increase In the severity of previously identified significant effects have not occurred, B New information of substantial importance with respect to this environmental resource/impact resulting in new significant effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects has not been identified, and C None of the proposed protect changes would significantly affect this environmental resource 2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES Would the protect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the T Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, 'I' or a Williamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or 'I' nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Addendum February 1, 2006 823308 ~-I I rage a New New Information Less than Information Showing Signifcant Substantial Substantial Showing gbihty to ImpacVNo Change in Change in New or Reduce, Changes or No Issues and Supporting Information Sources 'Protect Requiting Circumstances Requiring Greater Significant but not t El New Information Impact Maior MND Mafor MND Effects imina e Significant Requiting Revisions Revisions than Effects in Preparation Previous previous of an MND MND MND There are no environmental Impacts because this protect will convert multiple-family units Into condominwms In addition, these Impacts were within the scope of the EIR and previous envlronmental findings by the Planning Commission on December 10, 2003, and the changes in the protect do not create the need for additional environmental review for the A B following additional reasons Substantial changes in the protect and pro/ect circumstances resulting In new significant effects or a substantial increase In the severity of previously identified significant effects have not occurred, New information of substantial importance with respect to this environmental resource/Impact resulting in new significant effects or a substantial increase In the severity of previously identified effects has not been identified, and C None of the proposed pro/ect changes would significantly affect this environmental resource 3. AIR QUALITY Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations Would the protect a) Conflict with or obstruct Implementation of the applicable air quality plan 'I' b) Violate any air quality standard or contnbute substantially to an existing or protected air ,~, quality wolation~ c) Result In a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which ,J. exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors) d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations 'I e) Create obtectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people 'j' Addendum February 1, 2006 823308 D -ia~ Page New New Information Less than Information Showing Signfiwnt Substantial Substantial Showng gbihty to ImpacUNo Change in Change in New or Reduce Changes or No Issues and Supporting Information Sources ' Project Requirin 9 Circumstances Requiring Greater Signficant but not t New Information Impact Mafor MND Mafor MND Effects Elimina e Sigmfiwnt Requinng Revisions Revisions than Effects m Preparation Previous previous of an MND MND MND The previously adopted EIR and environmental findings by the Planning Commission on December 10, 2003, considered the impacts on air quality resulting from the previous development prolect DRC2003-00336 and 337 The changes considered In this Addendum do not alter or increase the levels or severity of those impacts Therefore, the City concludes that A Substantial changes In the prolect and prolect circumstances resulting in new significant effects or a substantial increase In the severity of previously identified significant effects have not occurred, B New information of substantial importance with respect to this environmental resource/impact resulting In new significant effects or a substantial increase In the severity of previously identified effects has not been identified, and C None of the proposed prolect changes would significantly affect this environmental resource 4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the protect. a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or speaal .~. status species In local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wlidhfe Service b) Have substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community -I. identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the Cahforma Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of " ' the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited j to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any natroe resident or migratory fish or wlidhfe .I. species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict wdh any local pohaes or ordinances .I. protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance February 1, 2006 823308 p-~3 Page New New Information Less than Information Showing Significant Substantial Substantial Showing gbihty to Impact/No Change in Change in New or Reduce Changes or No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Protect Requiring Cvcumstances Requiring Greater Significant but not New n ti I f Impact Mator MND Mator MND Effects Ehmmate Sigmriwnt orma o n Reqwnng Revisions Revisions than Effects in Preparation Previous Previous of an MND MND MND f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habdat Conservation Plan, Natural Community 'I' Conservatlon Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat Conservatlon plan The site is currently developed and therefore there are no Impacts to biology or natural habitats The changes considered in this Addendum to the protect will not have any Impact on biological resources Consequently, the City finds A Substantial changes in the protect and protect circumstances resulting in new significant effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously Identified significant effects have not occurred, B New information of substantial importance with respect to this environmental resource/impact resulting in new significant effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects has not been identified, and C None of the proposed protect changes would significantly affect this environmental resource 5 CULTURAL RESOURCES Would the protect: a) Cause a substantial adverse change In the T significance of a histoncal resource as defined In §15064 5 of the State CEQA Guidelines b) Cause a substantial adverse change In the significance of an archaeological resource 'I' pursuant to §15064 5 of the State CEQA Guidelines c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique T paleontological resource or sde or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those 'I' interred outside of formal cemeteries The previously adopted EIR and environmental findings by the Planning Commission on December 10, 2003, indicated no prehistoric or historical archeological sites were evident on the site, and none were discovered during the construction phase of the development process Based on the lack of findings, the City finds A Substantial changes In the protect and protect circumstances resulting In new significant effects or a substantial identified significant effects have not occurred, reviousl f t th y p e severi y o increase in B New information of substantial importance with respect to this environmental resourcelimpact resulting in new significant effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects has not been identified, and C None of the proposed protect changes would significantly affect this environmental resource Addendum February 1, 2006 823308 p-~ 4 Page J New New Information Less than Information Showmg Signifcant Substantial Substantial Showmg gbtlrty to Impact/No Change in Change in New or Reduce Changes or No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Protect Requiring Circumstances Requiring Greater Signifcant but not New t I f Impact Mator MND Mator MND Effects Eliminate Sgmfcant ion n orma Reqwnng Revisions Revisions than Effects m Preparation Previous previous of an MND MND MND 6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential T substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo State Geologist for the area or based on T other substantial evidence of a known fault Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 iI) Strong seismic ground shakings T uQ Seismic-related ground failure, including T liquefaction iv) Landslides T b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of T topsoih c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a T result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined In Table 18-1 B of the Uniform Budding Code 'I' (1994), creating substantial nsks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste T water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water rage a February 1, 2006 823308 ,~"~ S New New Information Less than • Information Showing Sigmficant Substantial Substantial Showing Abtlity to ImpacUNo Change m Change m New or Retluce, Changes or No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Protect wnng Re Circumstances Requiring Greater Significant but not New n t I f Impact q Mator MND Mator MND Effects Eliminate Sigrnficant orma io n Requmng Revisions Revisions than Effects in Preparation Previous previous of an MND MND MND Implementation of SUBTPM17783 well "not" result in additional development within the City, or require grading, Boll preparation for development activity As indicated in the previously adopted EIR and environmental findings by the Planning Commission on December 10, 2003, adherence to standard budding code requirements, including requirements for grading and compaction of soil, will be required, and therefore the impacts to and from geology have already been addressed Therefore, the City is able to conclude A Substantial changes in the project and project circumstances resulting in new significant effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects have not occurred, B New information of substantial importance with respect to this environmental resource/impact resulting in new significant effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects has not been identified, and C None of the proposed pro/ect changes would significantly affect this environmental resource 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Would the protect a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the T environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials , b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable ,I, upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or 'I' waste within one quarter mile of an existing or proposed school d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to T Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or 'I' public use airport, would the pro/ect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the pro/ect area Addendum February 1, 2006 823308 D-~ ~ Page New New Information Less than • Information Showing Sigmficant Substantial Substantial Showing Ability to ImpacVNo Change in Change in New or Reduce, Changes or No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Protect Requmng Circumstances Regmnng Greater SigmFlcant but not New ti I f Impact Mator MND Major MND Effects Eliminate Sgnificant orma on n Requmng Revisions Revisions than EHecls in Preparation Previous Previous of an MND MND MND f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the protect result in a safety 7' hazard for people residing or working in the protect area g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere T with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, intury or death involving wildland fires, T including where wddlands are adtacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wlldlands~ The previously adopted EIR and environmental findings by the Planning Commission on December 10, 2003, already considered the impacts associated with this type of protect in terms of impacts on contaminated soil, the impacts of placing development near MTA rail line and other associated hazards from the development of additional housing units in the City The City concludes that A Substantial charges in the protect and protect circumstances resulting in new significant effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects have not occurred, B New information of substantial importance with respect to this environmental resourcelimpact resulting in new significant effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects has not been identified, and C None of the proposed protect changes would affect this environmental resource 8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Would the protect. a) Violate any water quality standards or waste T discharge requirements b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater T able level (e g ,the production rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted rage ~ r February 1, 2006 823308 -~ n New New Information Less than Information Showing Significant Substantial Substantial Showing Ability to ImpacVNo Change in Change in New or Reduce, Changes or No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Protect wnn Re Cvcumstances Requmng Greater Signficant but not New abon I f Impact g q Mator MND Mator MND Effects Eliminate Significant n orm Reqwnng Revisions Revisions than Effects m Preparation Previous previous of an MND MND MND c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or areas Including through the .I. alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-slte~ d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or 'I' substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff In a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned 'I' stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quahty~ T g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard 'I' Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area ,I, structures which would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, "I' including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp t) Inundation by seiche, tsumani, or mudflow~ T Addendum February 1, 2006 823308 ~-( S Nage r New New Information Less than Infonnahon Showing Sigmfcant Substantial Substantial Shoving Ability to ImpacUNo Change in Change in New or Reduce, Changes or No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Protect n R Circumstances wnng Re Greater Signfcant but not New Impact g equiri q Eliminate Information Motor MND Motor MND Effects Significant Requiring Revisions Revisions than Effects m Preparation Previous previous of an MND MND MND As Indicated in the previously adopted EIR and environmental findings by the Planning Commission on December 10, 2003, the development of multi-family residential units is likely to Increase impermeable surfaces in the City and would result in additional urban runoff that could contribute to the cumulative degradation of downstream surface waters and groundwater However, the impacts to these resources and facilities were not considered significant The proposed SUBTPM17783 as analyzed in this Addendum will not alter or change those impacts The City therefore finds that A Substantial changes in the pro/ect and project circumstances resulting in new significant effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects have not occurred, B New information of substantial importance with respect to this environmental resource/impact resulting in new significant effects or a substantial increase in the seventy of previously identified effects has not been identified, and C None of the proposed protect changes would significantly affect this environmental resource 9 LAND USE AND PLANNING Would the protect. a) Physically divide an established community T Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with tunsdiction over the protect (including, but not T hmded to the general plan, specrfic plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation T plan or natural community conservation plan The SUBTPM17783 does not contain policies or programs that would divide an established community, conflict with other land use plans or impact a habitat conservation plan or a natural community conservation plan Consequently, this protect is not likely to have any impacts on land use planning and the City concludes that A Substantial changes in the protect and protect circumstances resulting in new significant effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects have not occurred, B New information of substantial importance with respect to this environmental resource/impact resulting in new significant effects or a substantial increase In the severity of previously identified effects has not been identified, C None of the proposed protect changes would significantly affect this environmental resource 10 MINERAL RESOURCES Would the protect a) Result In the loss of availability of a known T mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state February 1, 2006 823308 D-~`~ Page 13 New New Information Less than Information Showing Si9nifiwnt Substantial Substantial Showing gbtlrty to Impact/No Change in Change in New or Reduce Changes or No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Protect Requirin 9 Circumstances Requiring Greater Significant but nol New ti I f Impact Malor MND Mator MND Effects Eliminate Significant on n orma Requiring Revisions Revisions than Effects m PreparaUOn Previous previous of an MND MND MND b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- Important mineral resource recovery site 'j' delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan The proposed parcel condo map division will not create or have any impacts on this resource Consequently, the City fends A Substantial changes in the prolect and prolect circumstances resulting in new significant effects or a substantial increase In the severity of previously Identified significant effects have not occurred, B New information of substantial Importance with respect to this environmental resource/impact resulting in new significant effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects has not been identified, and C None of the proposed prolect changes would significantly affect this environmental resource 11. NOISE. Would the prolect result In: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels In excess of standards established In the T local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of T excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient T noise levels In the prolect vicinity above levels existing without the prolect d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in T ambient noise levels in the prolect vicinity above levels existing without the prolect e) For a prolect located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or 'I' public use airport, would the prolect expose people residing or working In the prolect area to excessive noise levels f) For a prolect within the wcindy of a pnvate airstnp, would the prolect expose people T' residing or working In the prolect area to excessive noise levels Addendum February 1, 2006 823308 ©-a~ Page New New Information Less than Information Showing Signifcant Substantial Substantial Showing Ability to ImpacUNo Change in Change in New or Reduce Changes or No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Protect inn R Circumstances uinng Re Greater Significant but not New Impact g equ q Eliminate Information Mator MND Mator MND Effects Signifcant Requiring Revisions Revisions than Effects in Preparation Previous previous of an MND MND MND This protect well not create additional noise Impacts because the protect is for the conversion of the multiple-family units Into condominiums For this reason, the Clty concludes A Substantial changes in the protect and protect circumstances resulting in new significant effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects have not occurred, B New information of substantial Importance with respect to this environmental resource/Impact resulting in new significant effects or a substantial increase In the severity of previously identified effects has not been identified, and C None of the proposed protect changes would significantly affect this environmental resource 12 POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the protect• a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new T homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) Displace substantial numbers of existing f th T e housing, necessitating the construction o replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, t T necessitating the construction of replacemen housing elsewhere The proposed protect will not create additional persons in the area The impact of the proposal on population growth was fully considered in the previously adopted EIR and environmental findings by the Planning Commission on December 10, 2003 The City therefore finds A Substantial changes in the protect and protect circumstances resulting in new significant effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects have not occurred, B New information of substantial importance with respect to this environmental resource/impact resulting in new significant effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects has not been Identified, and C None of the proposed protect changes would significantly affect this environmental resource rage ~ a February 1, 2006 823308 ~~ New New Information Less than Information Showing Signifcant Substantial Substantial Showing gbihty to ImpacUNo Change in Change in New or Reduce, Changes or No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Protect irin R Cvcumsiances Requiring Greater Significant but not New Impact g equ Eliminate Information Mator MND Malor MND Effects Signifcant Requinng Revisions Revisions than Effects in Preparation Previous previous of an MND MND MND 13 PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the protect result in substantial adverse physical Impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental T facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance obtectrves for any of the public services ~ i) Fire protectionv T u) Police protecUon~ T III) $ChOOIS~ iv) Parks T v) Other public facillties~ T The previously adopted EIR and environmental findings by the Planning Commission on December 10, 2003, fully considered the impacts of this protect on the need for additional schools, police and fire services, and other municipal services Consequently, the City concludes A Substantial changes in the protect and protect circumstances resulting in new significant effects or a substantial increase In the severity of previously identified significant effects have not occurred, B New information of substantial importance with respect to this environmental resourcelimpact resulting in new significant effects or a substantial Increase in the seventy of previously Identified effects has not been identified, and C None of the proposed protect changes would significantly affect this environmental resource 14 RECREATION a) Would the protect increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other T recreational facitihes such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated Addendum February 1, 2006 823308 p -~~. rage r New New Intormaton Less than Information Showing Significant Substantial Substantial Showing Ability to ImpacVNo Change in Change in New or Reduce, Changes or No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Protect R Circumstances uinn Re Greater Significant but not New Impact eqwnng g q Eliminate Information Mator MND Maior MND Effects Signifcant Reqwnng Revisions Revisions than Effects in Preparation Previous previous of an MND MND MND b) Does the protect Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of 'I' recreational facllltles which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment The proposed condo map will not create new Impacts on recreational, or expansion of recreational facilities The previously adopted EIR and environmental findings by the Planning Commission on December 10, 2003, were fully considered and analyzed In the previous analysis The City therefore finds A Substantial changes In the protect and protect circumstances resulting in new significant effects or a substantial Increase In the severity of previously Identified significant effects have not occurred, B New Information of substantial importance with respect to this environmental resource/Impact resulting in new significant effects or a substantial Increase In the severity of previously Identified effects has not been Identified, and C None of the proposed protect changes would significantly affect this environmental resource 15. TRANSPORTATIONfTRAFFIC Would the protect• Cause an Increase In traffic which Is substantial In relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (I a ,result Ina 'I` substantial Increase In either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at Intersections) b) Exceed either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the T county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result In a change in air traffic patterns, Including either an Increase In traffic levels or a T change In location that results In substantial safety risks d) Substantially Increase hazards due to a design feature (e g ,sharp curves or dangerous 'r intersections) or Incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) e) Result in Inadequate emergency access T f) Result In inadequate parking capacity T Nage '- i February 1, 2006 823308 (~ -~3 New New Information Less than Information Showing Significant Substantial Substantial Showing gbihty to Impact/No Change in Change in New or Reduce. Changes or NO Issues and Supporting Information Sources Protect Requinn 9 Circumstances Requinn g Greater Significant but not li t New fonnahon I Impact Maior MND Maior MND Effects mina e E Significant n Regwnng Revisions Revisions than Effects in PreparaUOn Previous Previous of an MND MND MND g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or .I. programs supporting alternative transportation (e g ,bus turnouts, bicycle racks) The previous adopted EIR and environmental findings by the Planning Commission on December 10, 2003, previously considered the effects of the construction of the multi-family development The proposed condo map will not have an impact on traffic and such, that has not already been analyzed and mitigated Consequently, the Clty concludes A Substantial changes m the protect and protect circumstances resulting in new significant effects or a substantial rred t B occu increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects have no New information of substantial importance with respect to this environmental resource/impact resulting m new significant effects or a substantial increase in the seventy of previously identified effects has not been identified C None of the proposed protect changes would affect this environmental resource 16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the protect• a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of T the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or ,I, expansion of existing faaltties, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of 'I' existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the protect from existing entitlements and 'I' resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve ,I, the protect that it has adequate capacity to serve the protects protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ,I, capacity to accommodate the protects solid waste disposal needs Addendum February 1, 2006 823308 D~ Page New New Information Less than Information Showing Sigmfcant Substantial Substantial Showing Ability to ImpactlNo Change in Change in New or Reduce, Changes or No Issues and Supporting Informatwn Sources Prgect uiting Re Circumstances Regmnng Greater Significant but not New t f Impact q Major MND Major MND Effects Eliminate Significant ion In orma Requiring Revisions Revisions than Effects in Preparation Previous Previous of an MND MND MND g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes 'I' and regulations related to solid waste The previously adopted EIR and environmental findings by the Planning Commission on December 10, 2003, considered the impacts of the programs and policies on the need for wastewater, storm water drainage facilities, solid waste disposal, water and other utilities No changes or addition to aforementioned facilities and utilities will arise from the proposed condo map Therefore, the City finds A Substantial changes In the protect and protect circumstances resulting in new significant effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects have not occurred, B New information of substantial importance with respect to this environmental resource/impact resulting in new significant effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects has not been identified, and C None of the proposed protect changes would affect this environmental resource 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a 'I' plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect 'I' are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) c) Does the protect have environmental effects T which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly rage _r y February 1, 2006 823306 D °~~ New New Information Less than Information Showing Signficant Substantial Substantial Showing gbihty to Impact/No Change in Change in New or Reduce Changes or No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Protect wnn Re Circumstances Regwnng Greater Significant but not New rmation I f Impact g g Mator MND Mafor MND Effects Eliminate Significant n o Requiring Revisions Revisions than Effects m PreparaUOn Previous previous of an MND MND MND The previously adopted EIR and environmental findings by the Planning Commission on December 10, 2003, previously addressed mandatory findings of significance The proposed condo map will not have an adverse impact In terms of cumulative impact and, there is no anticipated change in the impacts to biological resources and no anticipated change to the protect's contribution to cumulative impacts Therefore, the City finds A Substantial changes in the protect and protect circumstances resulting In new significant effects or a substantial increase In the severity of previously identified significant effects have not occurred, B New information of substantial importance with respect to this environmental resourcelimpact resulting in new significant effects or a substantial Increase in the seventy of previously identified effects has not been identified, and C None of the proposed protect changes would significantly affect this environmental resource -.~J Addendum February 1, 2006 8233013 D ~~ Page 12/15/2005 01 09 9094611824 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOC PAGE 02/06 Prospective Tenant Notice of Intent to Convert to Condominiums Date: To: 7828 Day Creek, # Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Dear Prospective Tenant: At the request of the Owner of 7828 Day Creek, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739, we are writing to inform you that the Owner plans to file a tentative map with the City of Rancho Cucamonga to covert this property to a condominium. No units may be sold in this building unless the City approves the conversion maps and until after a public report is issued by the Department of Real Estate. If you become a tenant of this property, You vain be given notice of each hearing for which notice is required pursuant to Sections 66451.3 and 66452.5 of the Government Code and Sections 17.22 030 and 17.22.040 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. You will, have the right to appear and the right to be heard at any such heanng. Should ou mab y be requtred to vacate property, aad if the condominium conversion is appro ed, y your nn,t. The condominium conversion process will likely take many months to complete. Although the Owner has no ctnrerit plans to market the units for sale, n the while you become a tenant of this property and the Owner commences a sales program Y are still lawfirlly a resident at be property, you (i) will be given venous notices and a right of first refusal to purchase your unit as required by law; (ii) may be entitled to relocation benefits. Please acknowledge your receipt of this notification by signing this letter below and thank you for considering a residency at 7828 Day Creek. Rancho Cucamonga, 91739. If you have any questions or comments, please do mot hesitate to contract (insert manager s name and telephone number). Smcerely, Management for 7828 Day Creek, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 1 acknowledge receipt of this notification. Date. ~~''`p~ ~~~~ 12/15/2005 01 09 9094811824 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOC Tenant Notice of Intent to Convert to Condominiums November 13, 2005 To the lawful tenant(s) of• 7828 Day Creek , # Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 PAIL b.i/ bb Dean Resident The owner of this building at 7828 Day Creek, Rancho Cucamonga+ CA 91739, plans to file a tentative tuap with the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga to covert this building to a condominium project Duzvag the tentative roaP process you vrill be given notice of each hearing for which notice is required pursuant to Sections 664513 and 66452.5 of the Government Code and Sections 17.22.030 and 17.22. ear and ~ eriBh ~ ~ heard ~ Cucamonga Development Code. You have the right to app au~y such hearing. No units may be sold in thts building unless the Ctty approves the conversion maps and until after a public report is issued by the Department of Real Estate. Should the condomtrtium conversion project be approved, tenants may be required to vacate the premises. The condominium conversion process .vi11 likely take many months to complete. Although the Owner has no currenR plans to market the units for sale, in the event that the Owner commences a sales program wbiJe You are still lawfitlly a resident at theme operty, you (i) will be given various notices and a right of first refusal to purchase Yo required by law; and (ii) maybe entitled to relocation benefits. Thank You for yow continutng residency at this project The tentative map application is lust the first step iu a long process. If you have any questions or comments, please do not (enter property manager's name and hesitate to contact telephone number). Siuncerely, property Manager's Name Deliveryvia- posted to doors, US Mail (return receipt) 1 ~' p-ag • RESOLUTION NO 06-16 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17783, A REQUEST FOR A CONDO MAP RELATED TO TWO ADJACENT MULTI-FAMILY PROJECTS, MERITAGE AND CHAMBRAY, THAT TOTAL 589 UNITS 24 6 ACRES IN THE VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0227-201-38, 41, AND 42 A Rentals 1 Charles Joseph and Associates, filed an application for approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17783, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 8th day of March 2006, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above-described map and concluded said hearing on that date 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred • B Resolution 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on March 8, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The subtect property is within the southern portion of the Victoria Arbors Village of the Victoria Planned Community, and b The subject site has recently been developed with multi-family residential units , and c The application proposes to convert the multi-family residential units into 589 condominiums units, and d The application for this subdivision was filed in September 2005 prior to any units being rented All prospective and current tenants were given a Notice of Intent to Convert to Condominiums as required by the State Subdivision Map Act and local ordinance, and e The proposed conversion would create 589 condominium ownership units consistent with the following goals and objectives of the General Plan Housing Element • i To provide "a variety of housing types for economic segments wishing to reside in the community regardless of race, religion, sex, or income group " ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-16 SUBTT17783 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES March 8, 2006 Page 2 u "Allow and create opportunities that enable a broad range of housing types, maintain a balanced supply of ownership and rental units, and provide sufficient numbers of dwelling units to accommodate expected new household formations " ui "Provide opportunities so that 30 percent of the persons employed in the City may hve in the City " 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the tentative tract map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and b That the design or improvements of the tentative tract map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and That the site is physically swtable for the type of development proposed, and • d That the design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable intury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and e That the tentative tract map is not likely to cause serous public health problems, and f That the design of the tentative tract map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision g The proposal is compatible with the obtective, policies, elements, and program specified in the General Plan, and h The design or improvement of the protect is consistent with applicable General Plan, and i The proposal is consistent with the purposes of Rancho Cucamonga Mumapal Code, Title 17 Development Code, Chapter 17 22, and The proposal promotes the health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the City 4 This action includes approval of an Addendum, pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act Gwdelines Section 15164 The previous findings analyzed the potential environmental impacts of Development Reviews DRC2003-0336 and 337 The determination by the Planning Commission on December 10, 2003, declared that Development Reviews DRC2003-00336 and 337 were within the scope of the supplement to the Victona Arbors Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No 98041137) that was certified by the City Council on July 7, 1999 • D,3d PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-16 SUBTT17783 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES March 8, 2006 • Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) All pertinent conditions of approval of Planning Commission Resolutions Nos 03-185 and 187 for Development Reviews DRC2003-00336 and 337 shall apply 2) A copy of the proposed declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) which will apply and which shall include an agreement for common area maintenance, including facilities and landscaping, together with an estimate of the initial assessment fees anticipated for such maintenance, a description of a provision for maintenance of vehicular access areas within a project, and an indication of appropriate responsibilities for maintenance of all utility lines and services for each unit 3) Tenant's Wahl to purchase As provided in Government Code Section 66427 1(b), any present tenant or tenants of any unit shall be given a nontransferable right of first refusal to purchase the unit occupied at a • price no greater than the price offered to the general public The right of first refusal shall extend for at least 60 days from the date of issuance of the subdivision public report or commencement of sales, whichever date is later 4) Vacation of units Each non-purchasing tenant, not in default underthe obligations of the rental agreement or lease under which he occupies his unit, shall have not less than 120 days from the date of receipt of notification from the owner of his intent to convert or from the filing date of the final subdivision map, whichever date is later, to find substitute housing and to relocate 5) The applicant shall provide written certification to the buyer of each unit on the initial sale after conversion that any dishwashers, garbage disposals, stoves, refrigerators, hot water tanks, and air conditioners that are provided are in working condition as of the close of escrow At such time as the homeowners' association takes over management of the development, the applicant shall provide written certification to the association that any pool and pool equipment and any appliances and mechanical equipment to be owned in common by the association is in working condition Engineering Department • 1) All pertinent conditions perTentative Tract 15974 and the Development Agreement shall apply p-3i PLANNING COMMISSION SUBTT17783 -CHARLES March 8, 2006 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO 06-16 JOSEPH ASSOCIATES 2) A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to recordation of the Final Map Formation costs shall be borne by the Developer The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF MARCH 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, • do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of March 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • ~ -3a COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17783 SUBJECT: CONDOMINIUMS APPLICANT: CHARLES JOSEPH & ASSOCIATES LOCATION: WEST OF DAYCREEK BOULEVARD/NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Comolehon Date General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _I_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or m the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition B. Time Limits 1 This tentative tract map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a _/_/_ complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, _I_/_ architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE of the Victoria Community Plan 2 Pnor to any use of the protect site or business actmty being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner SC-1-O5 '~ Protect No SUalT17783 Completion Date 3 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bulding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes fast 4 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 5 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the _/_/_ adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 6 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the Ctty Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of bulding permits D. Landscaping 1 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for _/_I_ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertil¢ing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 2 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in _/_/_ the required landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department E. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval poor to the issuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SC-1-OS i \planning\final\pingcomm\2006 res & stf rpnsubm~77aaeondrev3-e doe P3`f ~,,,,,~ . Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ' Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS October 25, 2005 Chambray & Mentage 7828 & 7922 Day Creek Blvd SUBTPM 17783 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT Separate fire alarm systems will be required for Lot 1 and Lot 2. Please submit plans for review and approval to FCS before the installation begins. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply (Existing) must be maintained as approved FSC-3 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems (Existing) must be maintained as approved Rancho Cucamonga Fire D~stnct Ordinance 15, the 2001 Cahforn~a Fire Code and/or any other applicable ~andazds requred an approved automatic fire spnnkler system m Multifamily structures greater than 7,500 square feet 2 Multi-family residential structures m excess of 4 units 3 All structures that do not meet.Fue Distnct access requirements RCFPD Standard #9-7 FSC-5 Fire Alarm Systems (Existing) were required on these sites 1 RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor azea (or by other adopted codes or standazds) required an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Building Code, RCFPD Fue Alarm Standazd #10-6 and/or the Cahfomia Fue Code 2 Separate fire alarm systems will be required for Lot 1 and Lot 2. Please submit plans for review and approval to FCS before the installation begins. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access (must be maintained) Fire Distnct access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as pnvate roads, streets dnve aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fue Department Access -Fire Lanes Standazd #9-7 1 Location of Access All portions of the structures 1~` story extenor wall shall be located w~thm 150-feet of Fire D~stnct vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the extenor of the building Landscaped azeas, unpaved changes m elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The maximum msrde turn radms shall be 20-feet c The m~mmum outside tum radius shall be 46-feet d The minimum radms for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f At any pnvate entry median, the mrmmum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent D 35 h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% ~ Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) ~ Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6- inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus • 3 Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings 4 Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed m accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1 The following design requirements apply b Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Ftre Construction Services (FCS) for approval Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS c Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward d Gates maybe motorized or manual e When fully open, the minimum cleazance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet f Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Ftre Safety Office for $20 00 g Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second h The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be eginpped with a manual ovemde device and afail- safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction i Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox ovemde key switch The switch must be installed outside the gate m a visible and unobstructed location ~ For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation Bi-directional or multiple sensors maybe regwred due to complexity of the vanous entry configurations • 5 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire Distnct standazds shall be included m the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 6 Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be cleazly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the azchrtectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which m the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that maybe hazazdous to life or property Public Assembly Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of egwpment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials m accordance with the 2001 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standazds . FSC-13 Alternate Method Application D-3~ 2 Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submttted on the Fire Distnct "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee ~S-14 Map Recordation 1 Reciprocal Access Agreement The plan as submttted indicate that the required Fire Department access a Is located on property which is not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property line, or c Is shared by multiple owners, or d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire District The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire Distnct approval The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan The agreement shall be presented to Ftre Construction Services for review and approval, pnor to recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bemazdmo To assist Fire Construction Services m reviewing the agreement the following shall be included m the submittal a The current title reports to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties included m the agreement b The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subject to the agreement c A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire Distnct access, the width, turn radu and slope of roadway surface shall be provided The access roadway shall comply with the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standazd #9-7. Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement The plans as submitted indicate that a required private fire mains or appurtenances a Pass through or aze located on property not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property line, or c Provide service to adjacent properties, or d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association, or Is shared by multiple owners Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the private water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection equipment essential to the water supply The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distnct The agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, pnor to recordation The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of San Bemazdino • p-3~ Staff Report DATE March 8, 2006 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM. Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner gY, Vance Pomeroy, Contract Planner SUBJECT CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00957 -GEORGE JABER - An appeal of the City Planner's denial of application for incompleteness regarding the proposed development of 4 condominwm residential units, to include two duplex buildings, on 59 net acre of land in the Medwm Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located on the northeast corner of 19th Street and Hellman Avenue - APN 0201-474-10 Related Fde• Preliminary Review DRC2003-00518 BACKGROUND The City is bound by the Permit Streamlining Act (Cal Govt Code §65920 et seq) to provide timely review of planning and zoning requests After Planning Department staff's first 30-day review of the initial application submittal to determine if it is complete, the Development Code (§17.04 020, Rancho Cucamonga Muniapal Code [RCMC]), in conformance with State law, regwres an applicant to file those materials identified by the various departments which will make the application complete within 60 days of the notice of the incomplete application. The cycle of 1) application submittal, 2) incompleteness determination, and, 3) the re-submittal of materials, may repeat several times for a given protect until the applicant is able to provide a complete application. While City staff is diligent in meeting the mandated 30-day review period, as a practical matter, the City Planner gives staff the discretion to allow 60 days to lapse if the applicant is providing sufficient information to show that reasonable progress is being made toward the re-submittal If the applicant has not been in contact with the planner and sufficient time has lapsed since the incompleteness letter was sent, the City Planner can deny the protect (without pretudice to the applicant's right to re-apply for the same permd) in order to allow the applicant more time to gather the regwred information and then re-apply for the request ANALYSIS General• On September 25, 2003, the applicant fled a request to construct five condominium • units in 2 buildings on the subtect property The Planning, Budding and Safety, Fve, and Engineering Departments reviewed the initial application submittal, and within 30 days of the Item E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONSIDERATION OF APPEARL FOR DRC2003-00957 - AYAD JABER March 8, 2006 Page 2 submittal, determined that the application was incomplete The application was subsequently reviewed and determined to be incomplete on three separate re-submittals by the Planning, Fire, and Engineering Departments on each review The first re-submittal was provided in about froe months, the second re-submittal was provided in about four months, and the third and last re-submittal was made about five months after the fourth incompleteness letter. The City's last notice of incompleteness was mailed to the applicant on April 21, 2005. Nine months transpired thereafter without a re-submittal or any other contact with the protect planner The City Planner determined that the application was incomplete and denied without prejudice on January 23, 2006 The general intent of the Permit Streamlining Act (PSA) is to prevent agenaes from the inappropriate stalling or slowing the progress of a zoning request that is otherwise ready to proceed. If the City has performed under the PSA, the application can move through the zoning approval process without delay If the applicant does not perform as required under the PSA, that is evidence that the application was not otherwise ready at the time of submittal The City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that some application submittals may have not been ready at the time of submittal and allows the applicant to re-file the application request, as a new and separate application, without the one year delay which is imposed on other forms of application denial in the Development Code. • In the case of DRC2003-00957, items of substantial importance have not been provided to the several departments and the time to submit them has long since expired The applicant may file . a new and separate application request for substantially the same protect on this same site when the applicant is ready with the items regwred to constitute a complete application. FACTS FOR FINDING In accordance with Section 17 04.020.B 1, the following is information that if absent would constitute a reason for a denial FINDING. Information which is to be supplied by the applicant and is necessary to prepare a legally adequate environmental document. FACT The following item(s) were not received as a part of the most recent re-submittal package and amount to an applicable reason for denial of the application. 1 Noise Study - Revise the Site Plan to include the mitigation measures recommended in the noise study The sound walls described in the acoustical mitigation measures are 6 feet high -the walls on the Site Plan are 3 feet high If the mitigation measures create a condition that does not meet the development standards, alternate measures must be presented by the acoustical engineer or the protect should be modified to meet the development standards FINDING Information necessary to prepare a supplemental Environmental Impact Report m compliance with the Public Resources Code, Section 21166 FACT Does not apply FINDING Information without which the City's decision to approve a protect would not be • supported by substantial evidence PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONSIDERATION OF APPEARL FOR DRC2003-00957 - AYAD JABER March 8, 2006 • Page 3 FACT The following item(s) were not received as a part of the most recent re-submittal package and amount to an applicable reason for denial of the application Supplemental Notice Requrements -For infill protects, the following items are requred as described on the attached "Filing Procedures for Supplemental Notice Requirements" a. Large 4-foot by 8-foot Notification Sign(s) shall be posted on-site Although a Sign Permit was obtained, the sign erected at this site does not have the correct information on it. It states there is a "Proposed New Single-Family Residence" to be bwlt there Also, the general condition of the sign (falling over and tagged with graffito should be remedied 2. Tentative Parcel Map and application fee must be submitted to create condommwm ownership as requested 3 Site Plan -The provided summary table on the Site Plan does not calculate correctly (e g., Private Open Space [POSJ and Common Open Space [COSJ less the COS results m noncompliant POS) and does not seem to match the plan. Provide clear dimensional verification of compliance on the Site Plan and expanded data on the chart • 4 Conceptual Landscape Plan -The provided Conceptual Landscape Plan does not include the heritage tree replacement as described m the Tree Report of January 25, 2005 Correct per replacement ratio in the report 5 Variance Request (DRC2004-00317) -Three variances are required based upon the most recent Site Plan layout 1) reduction of streetscape budding setback from 45 feet to 39 feet along 19th Street frontage, 2) reduction of interior site boundary budding setback from 15 feet to 10 feet, and 3) reduction in landscape and wall setback from required 35 feet average/25 feet mirnmum to 21 to 22 feet along both street frontages Your tustification letter must address each variance separately. Neither the Variance application form nor the Variance tustification letter state the nature of the Variance requested A detailed description of the request is regwred A separate plan and/or elevation exhibit would assist in the description The tustification for the Variance is generally weak and lacking m any details, and may not provide sufficient findings for the request to be granted 6 A 1st floor Floor Plan drawing (at same scale as the 2nd floor Floor Plan) was not provided in the drawing set for review 7 The Detailed Site Plan and Conceptual Grading Plan shall include typical street sections 8 The Conceptual Grading Plan shall include cross sections at all site boundaries . (minimum and maximum conditions), shade pavements areas and slopes 3'1 or steeper. Indicate elevations of existing conditions on adtacent properties ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONSIDERATION OF APPEARL FOR DRC2003-00957 - AYAD JABER March 8, 2006 Page 4 9 The dnve approach on Hellman Avenue shall be per City Std 101, type C (commeraal type) The radius "R" of the curb return shall equal the distance from the curb face to the near edge of the sidewalk with a minimum of 6.5 feet and a maximum of 20 feet 10 Submit a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that follows current WOMP templates/gwdance and regulations set forth by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWCB). Access the following website for an updated San Bernardino County WQMP for New Development and Redevelopment Protects http.//www swrcb ca.gov/rvvgcb8/html/sb_wgmp html This site provides Gwdance and Templates that can be filled out electronically and printed Adhere to these guidelines and use the templates provided Also, include the Best Management Practices identified in the plan on Grading Plans when submitted for plan check 11 Fire District fee is due 12. Proof of the available fire flow must be submitted 13 Fire Department access is not acceptable as submitted 14 Reaprocal agreements are required for fire department access and water supply RECOMMENDATION- Staff recommends that the appeal be denied and the City Planner denial DC VP\ma Attachments Exhibit A -Location Map Exhibit B - Aenal Photo Exhibit C -Incompleteness Letters 1, 2, 3, and 4 Exhibit D -Denial Letter dated January 23, 2006 Exhibit E -Appeal Letter of applicant dated January 26, 2006. Draft Resolution of Denial of Appeal for Development Review DRC2003-00957 u u • c `r Acting City Planner Wm~ Ltve Local ~ P~ of 1 Windows Live Local ~- ~ [Use current map view] °~ powered by Virtual Earth Beta What. Business name or category Where. Address, city, or other p/ace Vdelcome Scratch Pad Lrrate Me Permalink Add Pushpin Dlredions Setting- Cnrnmunity Help Abeur do ip 5. w n J Y m O }~ ttl Ally Loma Or q' m Ally Loma br m Q ro a Beryl Park. ;~_; '`_ .3 ~ ~ ~; _ r ~ p ~ ~,y, _~ _,. ,~'4, -~~'i S,._ r, ~, «. ` ~ Hghlantl Ave _ _ _ -_ _ <-:__ _ _ - d __ _` 8 2t0 ~o - - -- -- -_° - - .ao 3 Ganian St ~ ~ a u D ~' Y rn $ ~ Q L Z W b QI 30 w v Alta Loma ~ 14th St ~ ~$~I.js~~ ~ d aN ~ o v ' n D m ~ r ~ m Isaac Lord br < ~ Hamilton St a Hamilton SI m r m a_ ~ Mignonette SI Mignonette St Mignanahe SI N i m a a o m 'Sage Dr m 300 ydS m g 7rsvelBr lY _~' Ledi9 a' ~+ ~ m '(ac91e~wod 0` m 6 ~ 3005 Nkuow M .., http //local live coin/ 2/6/2006 Windows Live Local Page 1 of I i~tl %~~ ,Windows Live Local [Use current map view] ~ p ±~,~_ c ~ L, Virtual Earth Beta What Business name or category Where. Address, oty, or other place (~ U http711ocal.live coin/ y N /6/2006 Ioi Flrnrne °i,l at r}, Fad I i~rnte 11e Prr.n aL.,L r~.a.a o, ~~ti....., n,. _..w...~.~ _ .. _ : ty~r wn.unM J AI,p(ANDER Mayor ProTna DIANE WRLAMS Counnl>nrmbm Itix GuTIERRez ROBERT J HOWDYSHELI. • , ~ DONAID J KUATH, M D Cary Maw n THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JA°~ I-A"'' AI~P RANCxo CUCAMONGA October 28, 2003 Ayad Jader 4947 Huniswood Place Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SUBJECT• DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00957-VILLAGE GREEN RESIDENCES Dear Mr. Jader. Thank you for submitting your proposed protect We want your project to be a success, one which you and the City can be proud of. As you are already aware we have assigned a project planner, Kirt Coury, to assist you throughout the review process up to final occupancy. We have reviewed the application for your proposed protect for completeness and accuracy of filing and determined it to be incromplete for processing Attached ~ a fist of information needed poor to finding the . application complete. Further processing of your protect volt begin once the Completeness Items are submitted and the application accepted as complete We recommend that all issues on the attached list be addressed now to expedite processing of your protect. Submit eight copies (collated, stapled, and individually rolled) of the revised comliplete must berlecelved within 60 days from the date of this) letter ecessary to make the application This determination of incompleteness is final unless appealed within ten calendar days from the date of this letter Only Completeness Items may be appealed at this time. A wntten statement of reasons for the appeal must be filed with the Planning Commission Secretary with a $62 appeal fee. To expedite the process, please use the case numbers listed In the SubJect header above when corresponding with or contacting staff. Should you have any questions regarding the review process, or'rf we can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact the protect planner at (909) 477-2750, Monday through Thursday, from 7 a.m. to 6 p m. To meet with your proJe~c -ptan~er. Please call ahe ran appointment at a convenient time. Dan Coleman Pnncipal Planner DC.KC~m Attachment cc Dan James, Senior CIVII Engineer Brenda King, Public Service Tech I, Fire ~. 10500 Crvtc Ccnmr Dr • PO Box 807 • Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91729-0807 • Td 909-477-2700 • Fu 9091f77-2849 • www u rancho-cucamonga•° ~ FILE NO.: DRC2003-00957 • (COMPLETENESS COMMENTS) NOTE: This information is provided to assist in the preparation of a development package a more tho ough analysi Adur' ng the Development Review P oc ~ n~sary based upon Tias for a Successful Process: A. Address Technical and Design Issues as early in the process as possible. B to serve as th key oontact person with City staff. n your professional design team and C. Revise all plans to be consistent and to reflect staff's comments. D. Carefully review the Development Review Checklist submittal requirements. II. Planning Division (Kart A Courv) (9091477-2750: A Completeness Items -Additional information that must be submitted pnor to finding the application complete: 1, Planning Division's case number (e g., DRC2003-00957) shall be included in the . the block of all plans. 2. Supplemental Notice Requirements -For infill protects, the following items are required as descnbed on the attached'Fding Procedures For Supplemental Notice Requirements': a. Large 4-foot by 8-foot Notification Sign(s) ~icationefeesta site plan show ng submit a Sign Permit Application, $51 app location of sign, and a $500 cash deposit per sign. 3, Revise Vicinity Map on Cover Page to reflect the correct project location. 4. Environmental Information Form (Initial Study Part I) -Question #io ecSt i cation. Quest on #2' 1Submd co o~ photographCs ofs et andesuroundings. i 5. Submit three sets of typed and gummed labels, listing the name, address, and assessors parcel number of all grope h °ISt shall ibe obtamedtfrom the latest boundanes of the subject property. equalized assessment roll issued by the County Tax Assessor. In add~ion, include a radius map drawn on the Assessors Parcel Maps, indicating the subiect property with a 300-foot radius drawn around the property. fi project of be not f d, such as legal property ownerraappl cant, acerchitect, engmeere, etc. • ~ -8 COMPLETENESS COMMENTS DRC2003-00957 -VILLAGE GREEN RESIDENCE October 26, 2003 Page 2 7. Noise Study - Submit a noise study prepared by a certified acoustical engineer. The subject property is located within the 65dBA noise contour of the 210 Freeway and 19th Street, and a noise study is regwred. The General Plan indicates that noise levels will exceed 65dBA and 60dBA within 1,256 feet and 2,706 feet of the 210 Freeway centerline, and within 126 feet and 271 feet of 19th Street centerline, respectively An independent review by a third party acoustical engineer, paid for by the applicant, is regwred to verify the validity of the study. g, Histoncal Preservation -The existing house at 6695 Hellman Avenue that is proposed for demolition, is architecturally unique and may be histonc; therefore, any development application regwres concurrent evaluation by the Histonc Preservation Commission. Submit a Histonc Budding Assessment prepared by a qualified expert. This study will be used to determine whether the bam is worthy of landmark designation and how much land should be included in landmark. If the structure qualifies for local landmark status, then any development application must also be accompanied by a histonc landmark designation application and histonc landmark alteration permit application for demolition. 9 removalR The permit feesis $432tl An alrbonstirepoR seeq red wdhspermit application (see attached). • 10 cftthetsitetandnthe reationshpbof the proposed project toe exsUng surrou dting uses. The map shall indicate the proposed project Site Plan and all of the following items within a 600-foot radius: All parcel lines and streets (nght-of-way, improvements, drainage facd~Les), location and use of structures, adjacent access, and circulation, and existing zoning and land use. The scale of this map shall not be less than 1-inch = 100 feet. Aerial photos are not acceptable as a substitute, since they do not copy well as exhibit reductions. 11. Site Plan -Revise to include all information listed on attached checklist. Show all existing improvements and features within 200 feet. Identify all budding setback dimensions. Provde a summary table, including parking calculations, ratios, and regwrements. Delete all landscaping information and include on a separate Conceptual Landscape Plan. SP 17 water feature could not be found on plan. 12 check) stUenclude alandscape egend and percentage as welPas I ustrative typical elevations of all walls and fences and their materials. 13. Elevations -Indicate the maximum height of the buildings on all elevations. Label all elevations north, south, east, west, respectively. 14. Floor Plans -Label the scale used on all Floor Plans. • 15 Conceptual Gradino Plan - Submit a plan and provide all information listed on attached checklist, including the four restaurant parcels Show all existing improvements and features within 200 feet. Provide cross-sections, as well as ~~ COMPLETENESS COMMENTS DRC2003-00957 -VILLAGE GREEN RESIDENCE October 28, 2003 Page 3 street sections for all adjacent streets. Also, all cross-sections should extend through budding pads or streets. 16. Provide a Variance application, fees ($875), and justification letter to include the reduction of the landscaping setback requirement (from 35 feet to 31 feet on 19th Street and from 35 feet to 17 feet on Hellman Avenue). Provide an extra set of marling labels and radius map for the proposed vanance application. 17. Identify location, height and materials of walls and fences. Provide a typical illustration. 16. Identify location of and provide an illustrative elevation of the on-sde trash enclosure. B. Techmc~ssues -The following preliminary technical issues are minimum code requirements, which must be satisfied before the protect can be recommended for approval to the Planning Commission. It is recommended that these issues be addressed in the revised plans: A 35-foot landscaping setback is required along 19th Street and Hellman Avenue as measured from the curb face. Modify the site design and parking layout at the Hellman Avenue drive approach to reflect this requirement, or provide a vanance • request as mentioned on item A-16 above. All minimum required parking standards shall be met. 2 common open space, and usable ope specerequ ements. Bas cedeve opment standard requirements are identified in Section 17.08.040-B of the Development Code. If the protect design does not comply, then additional Variances will be needed C. Desio~n Issues -The following are preliminary design issues that are recommended to be addressed in the revised plans: 1. Architecture -The flat parapet roofline are inconsistent with the neighborhood character. The protect appears more urban commercial, than it does suburban residential. A recognizable design theme shall be established which is compatible with surrounding planned or existing developments and should be based upon prominent design features in the immediate area. The architecture should consider compatibildy with surrounding character, including harmonious building style, forth, size, color, material, and roofline. Shadow patterns created by architectural elements such as overhangs, protection or recession of stones, balconies, reveals and awnings contribute to a building's character while aiding in climate control. Provide architectural treatment to all elevations (i.e., 360-degree architecture). The mass and scale of the building should be proportionate to the site, open spaces, street location, and surounding developments. All attached protects adjacent to existing one-story single-family developments shall be one- • story, unless the impact of two-story structures on the existing one story ~-~~ • COMPLETENESS COMMENTS DRC2003-00957 -VILLAGE GREEN RESIDENCE • October 28, 2003 Page 4 neighborhood is fully mitigated with emphasis on privacy, view, and general compatibility 2 ne ghborhoodcmc udeatbutla~e not I m ted t flreal nvehrock, stacked Ist ne treatment, etc. Whatever material is proposed should also be the finish of the proposed wall pilasters. 3 endsaalongtl9th Street and tHelPman Avenuell (consultgwth staff for specifac locations). 4, Provide a detail drawing of the proposed water feature SP.6. 5. Identify if the garage doors will be wood or roll-up. 6. Provide large member trellis structures at the entrance of as well as within the enclosed spa area. 7. Incorporate a decorative sidewalk connection across the dnve approach. In addition, incorporate the same type of decorative/stamped concrete within the • roadway area (i.e. m front of the garage units and spa area). g, Provide a sidewalk connection to the public sidewalk, such as near the guest parking or dnve approach. g. Eliminate parallel parking by relocating to adlom the other guest parking spaces. 10. All roof- and ground- mounted egwpment shall be fully screened from public view. 11 locationspshown becausela) would snot comply with Fie District accessoroad standard of 14 foot vertical clearance, or b) planter space too small, such as near entry of Unit 4 Select a more appropriate tree Also, use Xenscape principles m the landscape design to conserve water. III. to meenno Diwsion (Rene Guerrero) (909) 477-2740 ext. 4010: A. Comoleteness• 1. SEE ATTACHED. B. Issues• 1. SEE ATTACHED • C, Preliminary Conditions: 1. SEE ATTACHED. E-II COMPLETENESS COMMENTS DRC2003-00957 -VILLAGE GREEN RESIDENCE October 28, 2003 Page 5 If the project is IV. Bwldin and Sate uiwsion - ~ ~a,~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ - approved, then the following plan check requirements will apply: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) A. General Reowrements• B. Submit five complete sets of plans mcludmg the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable); c. Floor Plan; d. Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); e and sn eloflservce entranoe condluctorslnpanel schedules, and single Ime diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, mcludmg isometncs, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g, Planning Division Protect Number (i.e., TT, CUP, DR, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a sods report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required pnorto plan check submittal. 3 Compensation coverage to the City pno~r to permft sisuancenses and Workers' 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. Site Dew ment: 2. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., DRC2003-00957). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Budding and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential protect or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. • r 1 ~-~~ COMPLETENESS COMMENTS DRC2003-00957 -VILLAGE GREEN RESIDENCE October 28, 2003 Page 6 Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receiptto the Building and Safety Division pnor to permit issuance. 3, The Budding and Safety Official shall provde street addresses after tracUparcel map recordation and pnor to issuance of budding permits. 4. Construction actiwiy shall not occur between the hours of 8.00 p.m. and 8:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per Cdy Standard (available atthe Planrnng Diwsion's public counter). 6. Submit pool plans to the County of San Bemardino's Envvonmental Health Services Department for approval. C. New S,~ res: 1. Provide compliance with the California Buildmg Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provde compliance with the California Buildmg Code for required occupancy • separations. 3. Roofing matenal shall be installed per the manufacturer's °high wind" instructions. 4. Provde draft stops in attic areas, not exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC Section 1505. 5. Provide draft stops in attics in line with common walls. 6. Extenor walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. 7. Openings in extenor walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC 5-A. 8. If the area of habitable space above the fast floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the construction type shall be V-1 Hour minimum. g, Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be not less than 1-hour fire-resistive construction. D. Gradin 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Buildmg Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A sods report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. E-(3 COMPLETENESS COMMENTS DRC2003-00957 -VILLAGE GREEN RESIDENCE October 28, 2003 Page 7 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Budding and Safety Official pnorto the issuance of budding permits. 5. A separate Grading Plan Check Submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fdl. The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Cml Engineer. E. Other: 1. Protect shall fully comply wdh accessibility requirements of 2001 California Budding Code Chapter 11 A (Housing Accessibility). V. Fire Prevention/New Construction Umt- (Moises Eskenazil (909a 477-2770: SEE ATTACHED. • G -~`t' U • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECT COMPLETENESS REPORT To Planning Division: Kirt Courv DRC2003-00957 APN 20]-47410 Type. Multi-Family (5 Umts) Location. NEC Hellman Ave. & 19`~ St. P&E Meeting: 10/7/03 By. Re a uerrero /0 /(p 03 Ckd. ~ •~ b b e3 Yes JC No, Accepted as COMPLETE --If no, see below (if Yes, see `B" only) A Completeness -Additional information that must be submitted prior to finding the application complete. 1. Revise Vicinity Map on Cover Page to reflect correct project location. 2. Detailed Site Plan shall include all driveways to scale on adjacent and across the street properties for a distance of 200 feet beyond the lirruts of the subject site. 3. Detailed Site Plan shall include all street improvements including curbs, gutters, sidewalks, median islands and pavement widths witlirn 200 feet of the project on adjacent and across the street properties. Label improvements as "existing" or "proposed (to be constructed with project)" or "future (by others and not-a-part of this development)". 4. Detailed Site Plan shall include typical street sections 5. Submit a Conceptual Grading Plan, wluch shall include, but not linuted, to the following a Conceptual Grading Plan shall rnclude existing features within and 100 feet beyond all site boundaries (label to remain or be removed) -- natural ground, trees, structwes, drainage courses, streets, trails, slopes, etc. b Conceptual Grading Plan shall rnclude Streets -- cross sections, improvements, rights-of--way, etc. c Conceptual Grading Plan shall include drainage and flood control facilities (size, type, etc.), easements, property lines, rights-of--way, pazkway culverts where drainage is directed to streets; cross sections at all site boundanes (min and max. conditions); shade pavement areas and slopes 3:1 or steeper. d Conceptual Grading Plan shall include all proposed grading -- structures, curbs, walls (label height), gutters, pavement, walks, swales, mounding, slopes, open space, trazls, etc. 6. Submit a Water Quality Management Plan per the attached outline Proposed Best Management Practices (BMP's) shall be illustrated on the Conceptual Grading Plan. Page 1 of 3 E tc5 7 drivewayso n thr~Gradmg and Landscape plans mi accordtane~ with the policy • previously given. 8 Provide a Master Plan showing ingress, egress and dnve aisle locations for APN 201- 474-7 through 12. A single, shazed access driveway (50-feet maximum) may be considered for the subject site and the parcel to the north. B. Issues -Preliminary technical issues that must be addressed before the project can be recommended for approval to the Planning Commission: 1 shall be to a ed at least Z 0 feet from the intersec t on curb return at Hellman Avenue and I9'" Street. 2 The proposed dnve approaches shall be 35 feet wide within the public right-of--way. Beyond right-of--way, driveways can be reduced to 26' wide miirimum. Sidewalk shall cross the dnve approach at the zero curb face (no handicap ramps). 3 The plans do not show the correct street trees for both Hellman Avenue and 19's Street. See the attached "Street Tree Requirement Form". C Prelinnary Conditions of Approval: • 1 19`s Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Secondary Arterial" standards, including: a. Protect existing cwb and gutter, or repair, as needed. b Provide property line-adjacent sidewalk, as required. c Provide one (1) 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlight d. Modify or relocate existing traffic signal equipment, as required. e Provide traffic signage and striping, as required. f There shall be no driveway access fiom 19'" Street. g Protect existing 1226(s) signs, or replace, as required. 2 Hellman Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Collector Residential" standards, including: a provide curb, gutter and property tine-adjacent sidewalk, as required. b Provide one (1) 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlight. c. Provide traffic signage and striping, as required. d Protect existing R26(s) signs, or replace, as required. 3 An in-lieu fee as contributton to the future undergroundtng of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the project side of 19`s Street shall be paid to the Ctty prior to the issuance of building permits The fee shall be the City adopted oral amount times the length from the center of Hellman Avenue to the east project boundary • 4 An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead Page 2 of 3~ ~~ • utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the project side of Hellman Avenue shall be paid to the City pnor to the issuance of bwlding permits The fee shall be the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of 19`s Street to the north project boundary. 5 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the protect site from adjacent lots. 6. Comer property tine cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 7. parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to one foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages. 8. Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the esnorat buildinf operating all street lights during the first six months of operation, p g permit issuance or approval of the final map, whichever occurs first. 9. A signed consent waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate landscape and lighting districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance ofbuilding penmts, whichever occurs first. 10. The citywide Transportation Development Fee, covering the city-adopted estunated costs to mitigate the traffic impacts of new development, shall be paid upon issuance • of building permits. 11. Street Improvement Plans shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of--way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's office Security shall be posted and an improvement ageement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney guaranteeing completion of public improvements pnor to 5na1 map approval 12. Install missing street trees along the project frontages per the attached "Street Tree Requirements Form". Revise existing improvement plans as needed Page 3 of3~-~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION STREET TREE FORM LAST UPDATED 8/27/01 DATE: 4-1-03 T0: RENE GUERRERO, ASSISTANT ENGINEER COMMENTS PREPARED BY: PROJECT: nnwnl Rnl tRK_ CONTRACT LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECKER nRr.~0o3-00253(PR). DRC2003-00518 (PR), DRC2003-00957 LOCATION: NEC 19~' AND HELLMAN AVE DESIGN NOTES: 1 AVAILABLE PLANTING AREA (TYPICALLY BETWEEN BACK-OF-CURB AND THE SIDEWALK)T ESTAB (SHED STREETSUPON SHOULD ALREADY HAVE DESIGNATED TREE SPECIES. CONTACT LAURA BONACCORSI AT 909.477-2740, EXT 4023 FOR INFORMATION. 2. STREET TREES ARE TO BE SHOWN ON STREET OR OTHER PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS SIGNED BY THE CITY ENGINEER, AND CONSTRUCTED PER THE SAME. 3 STREET TREES SHOWN ON PLANNING DNISION SUBMITTALS ARE CONCEPTUAL ONLY 4. INTERIOR STREETS WILL BE REQUIRED TO SELECT DECIDUOUS TREES FOR EAST-WEST STREETS AND EVERGREEN TREES FOR NORTH-SOUTH STREETS FROM THE CITY'S APPROVED STREET TREE LIST. WIND-PRONE AREAS MAY BE REQUIRED TO UTILIZE A MORE DECIDUOUS PALETTE 5 INDICATED SPACINGS AND SIZES ARE REQUIREMENTS FOR CITY-MAINTAINED TREES ONLY WHERE THE TREE CONCEPT GOES BEYOND AREAS OF INFLUENCE NEAR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR ANY CITY MAINTENANCE EASEMENT, SPACINGS AND SIZES WILL BE PER THE ON-SITE PLANS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DIVISION ONSITE AND OFF-SITE PLANS SHALL BE COORDINATED. 6 STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS SHALL REFLECT THE LEGEND AND NOTES INDICATED BELOW. IN SOME CASES, WHE DETAILS ABOUT PARKWAY SIZES OR UTILITIES ARE UNAVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF CONDITIONING, OPTIONS ARE PROVIDED FOR VARIOUS SITUATIONS. R IS THE DESIGNER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ASCERTAIN THE CONTEXT OF THE TREE PLANTING, SELECT THE APPROPRIATE TREE OPTION, AND OMIT ANY ERRONEOUS INFORMATION ON THE FlNAL LEGEND 7 STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS SHALL REFLECT A LINE ITEM WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LEGEND TO STATE: STREET TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE NOTES AND LEGEND ON SHEET. (TYPICALLY SHEE71) CONSTRUCTION NOTES FOR STREET TREES: 1. ALL STREET TREES ARE TO BE PLANTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARD PLANS. 2. PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY PLANTING, AN AGRONOMIC SOILS REPORT SHALL BE FURNISHED TO THE CITY INSPECTOR. ANY UNUSUAL TOXICITIES OR NUTRIENT DEFICIENCIES MAY REQUIRE BACKFILL SOIL AMENDMENTS, AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY INSPECTOR. 3. ALL STREET TREES ARE SUBJECT TO INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE BY THE ENGINEERING • DIVISION. 4. STREET TREES ARE TO BE PLANTED PER PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS ONLY G ~~ • RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS DRC2003-00253 & DRC2003-00518& PROJECT/FILE #: DRC200-00957 APPLICANT NAME: OCCUPANCY CLASS: FLOOR AREA (S): TYPE CONSTRUCTION Ayad A Jaber PROJECT NAME: Village Green Residences LOCATION: 6695 Hellman DATE: PLAN TYPE: PLANNER: 10-21-03 MFR, 5 town homes FD REVIEW BY: Court Coury Fire Protection: R-1/R-3 7000sgft V-N Moises Eskenazl N/R Fees due on this project DRC2003-00957. please pay the $82.00 still due. THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Note to applicant Building permits will not be issued until the public and private water plans are approved. Prior to submitting for plan check A Fire flow letter must be submitted to FCS and the Fire Department access and Water (Fire Hydrant) supply must be recorded into the CC&R's . RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD CONDITIONS 8 REQUIREMENTS. FSC-1 General Requirements for Public and Private Water Supply 1 General Guidance for Fire Hydrants• The following provides general guidance for the spacing and location of fire hydrants Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in multi-family residential is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de- sacs the distance shall not exceed 150-feet b Fire hydrants are to be located 1 At the entrance(s) to a protect from the existing public roadways This includes subdivisions 2 At intersections i 3 On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As regwred by the Fire Safety Diwsion to meet operational needs 5 The location of fire hydrants is based upon the operational needs of the Fire District 6 Fire hydrants shall be located a minimum of 40 feet from any building 2 Minimum Fire Flow The requved fire flow for this protect is 2250 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended Please see "Water Availability" attachment for required verification of fire flow availability for the proposed protect 3 Hydrants Used to Supply Fire Flow: Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the required fire Flow subtect to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow 4 Show Existing Fire Hydrants and Mains. Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600-feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size r_ G r FSC-2 Private (On-Site) Water andlor Fve Spnnkler Underground Plans for Fve Protection Exceeds Allowable Distance: When any portion of a faalily or building is located more tnan i~u-ree~ from a fire hydrant located on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of prowdeldyThe distancenssmeasureddasnveh cular path oPtravel on acaessgroadwaysf not line of sight be Contact the Fire Construction Seances (909) 477-2713 Number of Fire Hydrants Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of regwred fire flow or fraction thereof, subtect to standard spacing and distribution regwrements Contact the Fire Construction Services (909)477-2713 Frre Spnnkler Underground: Prior to the issuance of a fire sprinkler system permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground to the Fire Safety Dmsion for approval ' FSC-3 Fire District Site Access-Technical Comments 1 h ghways, asdwea~as pe~vate roalds,Dstreetsadrrve a sles and des gnated fi a banes streets, and 2 Location of Access: All portions of the sWcture or facility or any portion of the exterior wall of the first story shall be located within 150-feet of Fue District vehide access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the bwlding Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates, and fences are an obstruction 3 Private Roadways and Fire Lanes: The minimum specifications for prroate fire district access roadways are a The mm~mum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The inside tum radius shall be 20-feet c The outside tum radius shall be not less than 50-feet d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45_feet e The minimum vertical Gearance is 14 feet, 6 inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the dnvrng surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) Access Walkways: Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required bulding exterior openings Vegetation• Trees and shrubs planted rn any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6- inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehicles FSC-4 Single-family Residential Sales Models u Minimum Access and Water: Residential sales model homes require approved Fve District vehicle access and water supply from a public or private water main system General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not speaficelly described below, which m the iudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conddions that may be hazardous to life or property r L 2 Operate a place of public assembly FSC•5 Plan Submittal Required Notice Required plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 200012001 Bwlding, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical Code, Health and Safety Code, Public Resources Code, and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39, Guidelines and Standards NOTE In addition to the fees due at this time please note that separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans FSC-6 Alternate Materials and Methods The Fire Safety Division wdl review requests for alternate material lirz on fohAlt mate Method" form along vnth authority The request must be submitted on the Fire District "App supporting documents PRIOR TO (PARCEL) MAP RECORDATION- For Each Development Phase 1 Reciprocal Access Agreement: The plans as submitted indicate that a required point of Fire District access a Requires passage on property not under the control of the applicant, or b Does not access a public way, or c Crosses a property line Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the adjacent property for use by the Fire District to gam access to the subject property The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building, or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan required below The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office The Fire Safety Division prior to recordation shall approve the agreement To assist the Fire Safety Dvision m reviewing the agreement the following shall be included m the submittal a Title Report. A current title report, policy of title insurance, or other equivalent documentation proving ownership of all property included in the agreement b Legal Description. A legal description of all properly subject to the agreement c Assessor's Parcel Numbers. The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subtect to the agreement d Site Plan: The access roadway shall comply with the requirements of Private Roadways and Fve Lanes listed above A scaled sde plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn radu, load-bearing capacity of roadway surface, etc shall be provided 2 Recprocal Water Covenant and Agreement: The plans as submitted indicate that a required private fire mains or appurtenances thereto a Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property line Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner's granting a non- exclusive easement for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, fire hydrants, and built-in fire protection systems The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamon a Fire District, Fire Safet Drvisior~Th;a reement shall be recorded with the Count G °" of San Bernardino, Recorders Office The Fue Safety Division prior to recordation shall approve me I • agreement PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Complete the following: 1 PnvatelOn-site Fire Hydrants• Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plaoval be the F ~e D sh ct1ePlans anddinstlallation shall comply wth F rerDistlrictystem for review and app Y standards Contac the Fire Safety Division for a copy of "Fire D~stnct Notes for Underground an Water Plans " 2. Private Fire HydrantslOn-site Installation: All private on-sde fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delrvenng any combustible building matenals on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing matenals, etc) A representative of Fire Construction Services shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit final test and inspection report to the Fire Safety Diwsion 3 Public Fire Hydrants: Prior to issuance of any bwlding permit, the applicant shall submit a plan and the Wat ~ D strict oOnlthe p anbshowea yex sting fire hydralnts wdhm ap600-foott ad uIS of ther'~ protect 4 Public Installation• All requred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delrvenng any combustible bulding materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing matenals, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builderldeveloper shall submit a copy of the Water District inspection report to the Fire Safety Dvision Contact Water District to schedule testing PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: . 1 Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner 1 Private Fire Hydrants- Final Acceptance: For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the budder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The bwlder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division 2 Fire Sprinkler System- Plans and Permit: Plans for the requred automatic fire sprinkler system shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed wdhout a Fire Construction Services perimt 3 fire sprinkler system(s) shall be testedtand accerpted by Fi a Construe on'ServecesO~upancy, the 4 Sprinkler Momtonng The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system Momtonng is required with 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupances, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupancies 5 Fire Suppression System. Plans and specifications for the fire suppression system for the protection of wmmercial-type cooking egwpment or other speaal hazard shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed wdhout a Fire Construction Services pennrt 6 Fire Alarm System: Plans for the fire alarm system shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for revew and approval No work is allowed Nnthout a Fire District permd • 7 Access Controlfiraffic Calming Device Permit A Fire District permd is re~tif CCg,Rts!lor o ecoess control device, traffic-calming dewce, or gate on any access roadway App .. ____.,._ ..ti,u ,..,,,ems,,, nrnvisions that orohibd obstructions such as traffic-calmm dewces (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modifications in fire lanes or access roadways without prior written approval of the Fire District, Fire Safety Division 8 Knox Rapid Entry System: A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed pnor to final inspectton se shall be submitted pnor to final bwlding plan approval Contact the Fire Safety h a Proof of purc Division for spec~c detatls and ordenng information 9 Construction Access: Fue D~stncl access, a minimum 26-feet in width and 14-feet, 6-inches minimum m clearances shall be maintained free and dear of any clear height shall be provided These minimu obstructions at all times, in accordance with Fire District Standards 10 Phased Construction: Each phase shall be provided with approved Fire Distract access roadways ceed the maximum permitted by the Fire Code or Fire Distract t ll ex no Dead-end roadways sha standards 11 Frre Lanes: Pnor to the issuance of any Cerlficate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed m accordance with the approved fire lane plan The CCBR's or other approved documents shall contain an rovisions that prohibit parking in the fire lanes The method of enforcement d p approved fire lane map an shall be documented The CCBR's shall also identrfy who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all regwred fire lanes 12 Address- Other Than Single-family: New buildings other than single-family dwellings shall post the ~celly th minirm l k t address ~nn eds 200 feet from the pub setba k exce b uding eriods of darkness When the illuminated during p street an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minmum number address shall be provided at the property entrance 13 Fire Suppression Systems- Final Inspection and Testing. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire suppression system(s) shall be tested and accepted by FCS 14 Frre Alarm System- Final Inspectron and Testing: Pnor to the issuance of a Certficete of Occupancy, the fire alarm (and detection) system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 15 Fire District Confrdentral Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the t "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" Form and submit to t D ric is Rancho Cucamonga Fire the Fire Safety Division This forth provides contact mfortnation for Fire Distract use ~.3 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Mayor Jiro Trm DIANE WILLIAMS Counnlmrmbm REx GurIFRRF7 ROBERT) HOWDYSHE DONALD ] KURTH, M Cary Managm JACx IwM, AICP RANCHO `,''UCAMONGA May 20, 2004 Ayad Jader 4947 Huntswood Place Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00957 -VILLAGE GREEN RESIDENCES Dear Mr Jader Thank you for submitting your proposed protect We want your project to be a success, one which you and the City can be proud of. As You are already aware we have assigned a project planner, Vance Pomeroy, to assist you throughout the review process up to final occupancy. We have reviewed the application for your proposed prolect for completeness and accuracy of filing and determined it to be Incomplete for processing Attached is a list of information needed prior to finding the appllcatlon complete Further processing of your prolect well begin once the Completeness Items are submitted and the application accepted as complete We recommend that all issues on the attached list be addressed now to expedite processing of your prolect Submit eight copies (collated, stapled, and Individually rolled) of the revised comllplete mu thberleceived within 60 days from the date of this) letter ecessary to make the application This determination of incompleteness is final unless appealed within ten calendar days from the date of this letter foiled w th theePlannmg Co mass on Sec elt ry wrth ai$62 appeal fee tatement of reasons for the appeal must be To expedite the process, please use the case numbers listed in the Subject header above when corresponding with or contacting stall. Should you have any questions regarding the review process, or if we can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact the prolect planner at (909) 477-2750, Monday through Thursday, from 7 a m. to 6 p m. To meet with your project planner, please call ahead for an appointment at a convenient time. DC~VP~nIa Attachment ~ • cc Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer Brenda King, Public Service Tech I, Fire G 10500 Gv¢ Ccnrer Dr • FO Boz 807 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 • Td 909-477-2700 • Fax 9091177-2849 • www n rancho-Cucamonga ca us Principal Planner FILE NO.: DRC2003-00957 • (COMPLETENESS COMMENTS) NOTE: This information is provided to assist in the preparation of a development package complete for processing. Additional information or comments may be necessary based upon a more thorough analysis during the Development Review Process. I Tips for a Successful Process• A Address Technical and Design Issues as early in the process as possible B Identify one person for overall coordination between your professional design team and to serve as the key contact person with City staff C. Revise all plans to be consistent and to reflect staff's comments. D Carefully review the Development Review Checklist submittal regwrements E Prowde an itemized narrative response to this letter for each responsible Division. II. Plannino Division (Vance Pomeroy) (9091477-2750: A Completeness Items -Additional information that must be submitted pnor to fmdmg the application complete: • 1 Supplemental Notice Requvements -For mfill protects, the following items are required as described on the attached "Ftlmg Procedures For Supplemental NoLCe Requirements " a Large 4-foot by 8-foot Notification Sign(s) shall be posted on-site. Please submit a Sign Permit Application, $51 application fee, a Site Plan showing location of sign, and a $500 cash deposit per sign Such sign must be installed and the requred deposit fled with the City pnor to fmdmg this application complete. 2 Tentative Parcel Map and $2,514 fee must be submitted to create condominium ownership as requested. 3. Prowde a Vicinity Map on the Cover Page to reflect the correct protect location. 4. Submit three sets of typed and gummed labels, listing the name, address, and assessor's parcel number of all property owners within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subtect property. The list shall be obtained from the latest equalized assessment roll issued by the CountyTax Assessor. In addition, include a radius map drawn on the Assessor's Parcel Maps, indicating the subtect property with a 300-foot radus drawn around the property Such labels, listing, and map must be submitted pnor to fmdmg this application complete . 5 Noise Study- Submit a noise study prepared by a certified Acoustical Engineer. The subtect property is located within the 65dBA noise contour of the 210 Freeway and 19th Street, and a noise study is regwred. The General Plan indicates that G- COMPLETENESS COMMENTS DRC2003-00957 -VILLAGE GREEN RESIDENCE May 12, 2004 Page 2 • noise levels will exceed 65dBA and 60dBA within 1,256 feet and 2,706 feet of the 210 Freeway centerline, and within 126 feet and 271 feet of 19th Street centerline, respectively An independent review by a third party Acoustical Engineer, paid for by the applicant, is required to verify the validity of the study. Such noise study must be submitted prior to finding this application complete 6 Historical Preservation -The existing house at 6695 Hellman Avenue that is proposed for demolition, is architecturally unique and may be historic; therefore, any development application requires concurrent evaluation by the Historic Preservation Commission Submit a Historic Building Assessment prepared by a qualified expert This study will be used to determine whether the bam is worthy of landmark designation and how much land should be included in landmark If the structure qualifies for local landmark status, then any development application must also be accompanied by a historic landmark designation application and historic landmark alteration permit application for demolition. The previously submitted evaluation is not sufficient The Historic Building Assessment must follow best professional practices in the field of cultural resource management such a those promulgated by the Secretary of the Interior, etc. to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 7 A Tree Removal Permit is required for all on-site heritage trees proposed for removal. The permit fee is $432. An arborist report is regwred with the permit application (see attached). The Tree Plan submitted is not sufficient. The location, • species, size, and condition, as well as evaluation per the requirements of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, must be provided in plan and narrative form by a Certified Arborist (a State of California designation). The report shall include a Site Plan identifying each tree location by its corresponding tag number 8 Site Utilization Map - Provide a blue line map drawn to scale showing the location of the site and the relationship of the proposed protect to existing surrounding uses. The map shall indicate the proposed protect Site Plan and all of the following items within a 600-foot radius All parcel lines and streets (right-of-way, improvements, drainage faalities), location and use of structures, adtacent access, and circulation, and existing zoning and land use. The right-of-way improvements are not of sufficient detail and lack appropriate labels of all features. The scale of this map shall not be less than 1-inch = 100 feet. Aerial photos are not acceptable as a substitute, since they do not copy well as exhibit reductions 9 Site Plan -Revise to include all information listed on the attached checklist. All existing improvements and features within 200 feet are not shown, including the driveways, zoning, curb and gutter, and sidewalk for surrounding properties, as well as street sections and drainage Identify all building setback dimensions The provided summary table does not include parking calculations, ratios, and requirements, and does not provide sufficient detail on the required and provided amounts for all open space categories 10 Conceptual Landscape Plan -The provided Conceptual Landscape Plan is not • completed per the submittal checklist Include a landscape legend showing all plant materials, their species, size, amount, and percentage, as well as illustrative typical elevations of all walls and fences and their materials z7-~o COMPLETENESS COMMENTS DRC2003-00957 -VILLAGE GREEN RESIDENCE May 12, 2004 • Page 3 11 Elevations -Indicate the maximum height of the buildings on all elevations up to the top of the roofing surface rather than the top plate. Label all elevations north, south, east, west, respectively, rather than front, rear, etc. Show all elevations (one is cut off on the E2 sheet), especially as they differ from one building to the other m design details. In addition, provide a more illustrative display of the elevations to provde meaningful depth to show design features 12 Floor Plans - Employ a'/e-inch =1-foot scale on all Floor Plans and show detail for all units including the unit number and/or building number Show garage doors m the plan 13. Conceptual Grading Plan - Submit a revised plan and provide all information listed on the attached checklist The provided plan does not show atl existing improvements and features within 200 feet. Provide cross-sections, as well as street sections for all adtacent streets. Also, all cross-sections should extend through budding pads or streets. 14 Prowde a Variance tustification letter to substantiate the reduction of the landscaping setback requirement (from 35 feet to 31 feet on 19th Street and from 35 feet to 17 feet on Hellman Avenue). The tustification should relate directly to the five legal findings regwred by state law to grant a Variance. An extra set of • mailing labels and radws map for the proposed Variance application was not provided as regwred. 15. Better detail is needed for the location, height, and materials of walls and fences Provide a typical illustration and show the proposed plasters m plan on the Site Plan 16 Prowde illustrative elevations of the on-site trash enclosure mcludmg the decorative features found on the proposed site walls B. Technical Issues -The following preliminary technical issues are minimum code regwrements, which must be satisfied before the protect can be recommended for approval to the Planning Commission. It is recommended that these issues be addressed m the revised plans: Provide a protect summary table identifying the lot coverage, private open space, common open space, and usable open space regwrements in a tabular fashion that demonstrates compliance by mcludmg the regwrement and the proposed amount for each category of open space Compliance must also be demonstrated on either the Site Plan or a separate Open Space Plan calling out the location and size of each portion of the proposed open space categories so they match the numbers in the table Basic development standard regwrements are identified m Section 17 08 040-B of the Development Code If the protect design does not comply, then additional Variances will be needed. . C Design Issues -The following are preliminary design issues that are recommended to be addressed m the revised plans ~7 COMPLETENESS COMMENTS DRC2003-00957 -VILLAGE GREEN RESIDENCE May 12, 2004 Page 4 1 Architecture -The elevations appear rather generic and would benefit from a well-defined architectural style. The design would benefit from a richer incorporation of details and features of the chosen architectural design/theme Shadow patterns created by architectural elements such as overhangs, protection, or recession of stones, balconies, reveals, and awnings contribute to the character of a bulling while aiding in climate control. Provide architectural treatment to all elevations (i.e., 360-degree architecture). The mass and scale of the bwldmg should be proportionate to the site, open spaces, street location, and surrounding developments. All attached protects adtacent to existing one-story single-family developments shall be one-story, unless the impact of two-story structures on the existing one-story neighborhood is fully mitigated with emphasis on privacy, view, and general compatibl~ty It is unclear from the submitted information as to whether this design issue has been addressed. Explore a mixture of roof heights and massing to alleviate the appearance of bulk along the interior property lines. 2 Provide a second material on the exterior finish in the revised drawings - little is in evidence for any such usage. Other materials in the neighborhood include, but are not limited to real river rock, stacked stone treatment, etc., but should be appropriate to the chosen architectural design/theme. Whatever material is proposed should also be the finish of the proposed wall plasters. 3. Additional plasters shown on elevations for the typical perimeter wall must be • shown in plan at regular intervals, at changes of direction and at ends, along 19th Street and Hellman Avenue (consult with staff for specific locations). 4. The garage doors will be wood or roll-up and must be called out m elevation and shown on the Floor Plans 5 The several elevations of the large member trellis structures at the entrance do not match each other. 6. Incorporate a larger decorative sidewalk connection across the drive approach than proposed In addition, incorporate the same type of decorative/stamped concrete throughout the roadway area (i.e in front of the garage units and spa area). Provide a sidewalk connection to the public sidewalk, such as near the guest parking or drive approach. Show all roof- and ground-mounted equipment and how it wll be fully screened from public view. IV Enoineerinq Division - (Rene Guerrero) (9091477-2740 ext. 4010: , See attached comments Buldino and Safety Division - (Trang Huynht (909) 477-2710 ext 4200_: If the protect is • approved, then the following plan check regwrements wll apply E a~ COMPLETENESS COMMENTS DRC2003-00957 -VILLAGE GREEN RESIDENCE • May 12, 2004 Page 5 NOTE. ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) A. General Requirements: Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Srte/Plot Plan, b. Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable); c Floor Plan, d. Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometncs, underground diagrams, • water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air condit~omng, and g. Planning Division Protect Number (i.e , TT, CUP, DR, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a sods report Architect's/Engineers stamp and "wet" signature are required pnorto plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City pnorto permit issuance Separate permits are requred for fencing and/or walls. B Site Development Plans shalt be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i.e , DRC2003-00957). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations m effect at the time of permit application Contact the Budding and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2. Prior to issuance of budding permits for a new residential protect or major addition, • the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to' City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees t~ ~~ COMPLETENESS COMMENTS DRC2003-00957 -VILLAGE GREEN RESIDENCE May 12, 2004 Page 6 • Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Budding and Safety Division pnor to permd issuance. 3. The Building and Safety Official shall provide street addresses after tracUparcel map recordation and pnor to issuance of budding permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter) 6. Submit pool plans to the County of San Bemardino's Environmental Health Services Department for approval C New Structures• 1 Provide compliance with the California Bwlding Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2 Provide compliance with the Califoma Budding Code for regwred occupancy separations 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. • 4. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC Section 1505 5. Provide draft stops in attics in line with common walls 6. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. 7. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC 5-A. 8 If the area of habitable space above the first floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the construction type shall be V-1 Hour minimum. g. Walis and floors separating dwelling units in the same budding shall be not less than 1-hourfire-resistive construction. D Gradin Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with California Budding Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of • California to perform such work. ~~ COMPLETENESS COMMENTS DRC2003-00957 -VILLAGE GREEN RESIDENCE May 12, 2004 • Page 7 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official pnorto the issuance of bwldmg permits. 5. A separate Grading Plan Check Submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. E. Other: 1. Protect shall fully comply with accessibility regwrements of 2001 California Building Code Chapter 11A (Housing Accessibility) V Fire Prevention/New Construction Unit - (Moises Eskenazi) (909) 477-2770 See attached comments • ~~ CITY OF 12ANP OOTECCT COMPLETENESSGREPORTNG DIVISION . To Planning Drvisiorr Lisa Kuschel APN 201-474-10 Type. Multi-Family (4 Units) Location: NEC Hellman Ave & 19's St. P&E Meeting 4/6/04 By Rene Guerrero ~ (2 04' Ckd. ~,~,'°""~~~~ "-- Yes X No, Accepted as COMPLETE --If no, see below (if Yes, see `B" only) A. Completeness -Additional information that must be submitted prior to finding the application complete. I. Detailed Site Plan shall include typical street sections. 2. Show existing and proposed sidewalk locations on the Detailed Site Plan and Conceptual Grading Plan. 3 Submit a Conceptual Grading Plan, which shall include, but not limited, to the following: a Conceptual Grading Plan shall include existing features within and 10 ound beyond all site boundanes (label to remain or be removed) -- natural gr trees, structures, drainage courses, streets, trazls, slopes, etc. b Conceptual Grading Plan shall include Streets -- cross sections, improvements, nghts-of--way, etc a Conceptual Grading Plan shall include draznage and flood control facihdes (size, type, etc.); easements, property Imes, rights-of--way, parkway culverts where drainage is directed to streets; cross sections at all site boundaries (min. and max. conditions), shade pavement areas and slopes 3:1 or steeper. d Conceptual Grading Pl ttersalga emuent,~walksP swal~mounding, s opes,c pen walls (label height), gu space, trazls, etc 4 Submit a Water Quality Management Plan per the attached outline. Proposed Best Management Practices (BMP's) shall be illustrated on the Conceptual Grading Plan. 5 Line of Sight designs shall be provided for all project intersections, including major driveways, on the Grading and Landscape plans in accordance with the policy previously given B Issues - Preliminary technical issues that must be addressed before the project can be recommended for approval to the Planning Commission. 1 shall be Iota ed atCleastD200 feet fromcthe hntersection curb return at Hellman Avenue and 19`h Street Page 1 of 3 ~ ~~ • 2 The proposed drive approaches shall be 35 feet wide within the public right-of--way Beyond right-of--way, driveways can be reduced to 26' wide minimum. Sidewalk shall cross the drive approach at the zero curb face (no handicap ramps). 3 The plans do not show the coned street trees for both Hellman Avenue and 19w Street. See the attached "Street Tree Requirement Form" C. Prelunmary Condthons of Approval' ] 19a' Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Secondary Arterial" standards, including: a Protect existing curb and gutter, or repair, as needed. b. Provide property tine-adjacent sidewalk, as requued. c Provide one (1) 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlight d Modify or relocate existing traffic signal equipment, as required e Provide traffic signage and striping, as required f There shall be no driveway access from 19`s Street. g Protect existing R26(s) signs, or replace, as required. h. Replace existing dove approach with new curb and gutter to match existing. 2. Hellman Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Collector • Residential" standards, including. a. Provide curb, gutter and property line-adjacent sidewalk, as required b, provide one (1) 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlight c Provide traffic signage and striping, as required. d Protect existing R26(s) signs, or replace, as required. e Replace existing drive approaches with new curb and gutter to match existing. 3. An m-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utihties (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the project side of 19`" Street shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be the City adopted unit amount tunes the length from the center of Hellman Avenue to the east project boundary 4 An m-heu fee as contribution to the future undergroundmg of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunicarions and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the project side of Hellman Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be the City adopted unit amount rimes the length from the center of 19`" Street to the north project boundary. 5 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the project site from adjacent lots 6 Comer property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. • 7 Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to one foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages Page 2 of 3 ~~J 2 8 Anon-refundable deposit shall be pazd to the City, covenng the estunated cost of . operating all street tights dunng the first six months of operation, pnor to budding permit issuance or approval of the final map, whichever occurs first 9. A signed consent waiver form to Iom and/or form the appropnate landscape and hghtmg distncts shall be filed with the City Engineer pnor to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. 10 The crtyvnde Transportation Development Fee, covenng the city-adopted estmnated costs to mitigate the traffic unpacts of new development, shall be pazd upon issuance of building penmts. 11. Street Improvement Plans shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Pnor to any work being performed ~n the public nght-of--way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtauted from the City Engineer's office. Secunty shall be posted and an improvement agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney guaranteeing completion of public improvements pnor to final map approval. 12 Install rmssing street trees along the project frontages per the attached "Street Tree Requirements Fonn" Revise existing unpmvement plans as needed. Page 3 of3 ~'3U CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION • STREET TREE REQUIREMENT FORM LAST UPDATED 8/27/01 DATE: 41-03 T0: RENE GUERRERO, ASSISTANT ENGINEER COMMENTS PREPARED BY: DAWN ROURK, CONTRACT LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECKER PROJECT: DRC2003-00253(PR), DRC2003-00518 (PR), DRC2003-00957 LOCATION: NEC 19~" AND HELLMAN AVE DESIGN NOTES: y STREET TREES ON NEW STREETS ARE TO BE SELECTED FROM THE CITY'S APPROVED STREET TREE LIST, BASED UPON AVAILABLE PLANTING AREA (TYPICALLY BETWEEN BACK-0F-CURB AND THE SIDEWALK). ESTABLISHED STREETS SHOULD ALREADY HAVE DESIGNATED TREE SPECIES. CONTACT LAURA BONACCORSI AT 909-477-2740, EXT 4023 FOR INFORMATION. 2. STREET TREES ARE TO BE SHOWN ON STREET OR OTHER PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS SIGNED BY THE CITY ENGINEER, AND CONSTRUCTED PER THE SAME. 3 STREET TREES SHOWN ON PLANNING DIVISION SUBMITTALS ARE CONCEPTUAL ONLY 4. INTERIOR STREETS WILL BE REQUIRED TO SELECT DECIDUOUS TREES FOR EAST-WEST STREETS AND EVERGREEN TREES FOR NORTHSOUTH STREETS FROM THE CITY'S APPROVED STREET TREE LIST WIND-PRONE AREAS MAYBE REQUIRED TO UTILIZE A MORE DECIDUOUS PALETTE. 5. INDICATED SPACINGS AND SIZES ARE REQUIREMENTS FOR CITY-MAINTAINED TREES ONLY. WHERE THE TREE • CONCEPT GOES BEYOND AREAS OF INFLUENCE NEAR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR ANY CITY MAINTENANCE EASEMENT, SPACINGS AND SIZES WILL BE PER THE ON-SITE PLANS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DIVISION ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE PLANS SHALL BE COORDINATED. 6 STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS SHALL REFLECTTHE LEGEND AND NOTES INDICATED BELOW. IN SOME CASES, WHEN DETAILS ABOUT PARKWAY SIZES OR UTILITIES ARE UNAVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF CONDITIONING, OPTIONS ARE PROVIDED FOR VARIOUS SITUATIONS IT IS THE DESIGNER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ASCERTAIN THE CONTEXT OF THE TREE PLANTING, SELECT THE APPROPRIATE TREE OPTION, AND OMIT ANY ERRONEOUS INFORMATION ON THE FINAL LEGEND 7 STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS SHALL REFLECT A LINE ITEM WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LEGEND TO STATE: STREET TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE NOTES AND LEGEND ON SHEET ~. (TYPICALLY SHEET 1) ~ , $ `^GO ~ ~ v a " -r ~ ' ~ - ' ' w a ersUcemla mdlca ~ L 19~^ STREET g - Lavender MyNe Hybnd a 9' Y0 0 C BOX 24 FILL IN 'Musk ee' HELLMAN AVE LagersVoemla mdlca Crape Myrtle Hybnd - Plnk 3' 20' 0 C 24' BOX UNDER UTILITIES 'Tu$carOra' CONSTRUCTION NOTES FOR STREET TREES: 1. ALL STREET TREES ARE TO BE PLANTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARD PLANS. 2. PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY PLANTING, AN AGRONOMIC SOILS REPORT SHALL BE FURNISHED TO THE CITY INSPECTOR. ANY UNUSUAL TOXICITIES OR NUTRIENT DEFICIENCIES MAY REQUIRE BACKFILL SOIL AMENDMENTS, AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY INSPECTOR. ALL STREET TREES ARE SUBJECT TO INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE BY THE ENGINEERING DIVISION 4 STREET TREES ARE TO BE PLANTED PER PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS ONLY. ~~ THE CITY OF RANCHO CiJCAMONGA WtI.LtAM J HI F.XArv uttc Mayor ProTrm DutaE Wiu.vn~s Couno[mrmbm RFX GIJrIERREZ ROBERT J HOWDYSHFJ~ DoNN.o ] Kuxrrt, M Crry Managn Jncx I.nt.t, AICP RANCHO C,'UCAMONGA October 27, 2004 Ayad Jader 4947 Huntswood Place Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00957 -VILLAGE GREEN RESIDENCES Dear Mr. Jader. Thank you for submitting your proposed protect. We want your project to be a success, one which you and the City can be proud of. As you are already aware we have assigned a project planner, Vance Pomeroy, to assist you throughout the review process up to final occupancy. W e have reviewed the application for your proposed protect for completeness and axuracy of fling and determined d to be incomplete for processing. Attached is a list of information needed prior to finding the application complete. Further processing of your protect will begin once the Completeness Items are submitted and the application accepted as complete. We recommend that all issues on the attached list be addressed now to expedite processing of your protect. Submd eight copies (collated, stapled, and individually rolled) of the revised application to the Planning Department. The information and/or plans necessary to make the application complete must be received within 60 days from the date of this letter. This determination of incompleteness is final unless appealed within ten calendar days from the date of this letter. Only Completeness Items may be appealed at this time. A written statement of reasons for the appeal must be filed with the Planning Commission Secretary with a $62 appeal fee. To expedite the process, please use the case numbers listed in the Subject header above when corresponding with or contacting staff. Should you have any questions regarding the review process, or if we can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact the protect planner at (909) 477-2750, Monday through Thursdayfrom 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. To meet with your project planner, please call ahead for an appointment at a convenient time. Principal Planner Attachment ~~ • cc• Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer Moses Eskenazi, Senior Plans Examiner r~~~ tn5n0 C•,v¢ Cenmr Dr • PO Box 807 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 • Td 909-477-2700 • Fax 909-477-2849 • wawa rancho-cucamonga ca us FILE NO.: DRC2003-00957 (COMPLETENESS COMMENTS) NOTE: This information is provided to assist in the preparation of a development package complete for processing. Additional information or comments may be necessary based upon a more thorough analysis during the Development Review Process. I. Tips for a Successful Process• A. Address Technical and Design Issues as early in the process as possible. B. Identify one person for overall coordination between your professional design team and to serve as the key contact person with the City staff. C. Revise all plans to be consistent and to reflect the staff's comments. D. Carefully review the Development Review Checklist submittal requirements. E. Provide an itemized narrative response to this letter for each responsible Division. • II. Planning Department (Vance Pomeroy) (909) 477-2750: A. Completeness Items -Additional information that must be submitted pnorto finding the application complete. 1 Supplemental Notice Requirements - For infill protects, the following items are required as described on the attached °Fding Procedures For Supplemental Notice Requirements:' a. Large 4-foot by 8-foot Notification Sign(s) shall be posted on-site. Please submit a Sign Permit Application, $51 application fee, a Site Plan showing location of sign, and a $500 cash deposit per sign. The sign must be installed and the required deposit filed with the City prior to finding this application complete. 2. Tentative Parcel Map and a $2,514 tee must be submitted to create condominium ownership as requested 3. Noise Study- Revise the Site Plan to include the mitigation measures recommended in the noise study If the mitigation measures create a condition that does not meet the development standards, alternative measures must be presented by the acoustical engineer 4 Historical Preservation -The Historic Resources report is deficient and inconclusive. The report must include testing the significance of the resource against the evaluation cntena of each of the national, state and local laws. Please include the qualifications of the person preparing the report. If any resource qualifies for local landmark status, then a development • application must also be accompanied by a Historic Landmark Designation Application and a Historic Landmark Alteration Permit Application•for Demolition. E ~7 COMPLETENESS COMMENTS DRC2003-00957 -VILLAGE GREEN RESIDENCE October 27, 2004 Page 2 5 A Tree Removal Permit has been received along with the permit fee. However, the permit does not outline or list the trees to be removed or the reasons for the removal. The Tree Plan drawing is not an arbonst report, which is required with the permit application The report must be prepared by a Certified Arborist (a State of California designation) and include the location, species, size, and condition, as well as, evaluation per the regwrements of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Provide in plan, narrative form, and include a key to the Site Plan identifying each tree location by its corresponding tag number. 6. Site Plan -The provided summary table does not provide sufficient detail on the required and provided amounts for all open space categories in a fashion that shows compliance. (e.g., Common open space is a minimum of 30 percent, the chart appears to show only 24.8 percent being provided.) • 7. Conceptual Landscape Plan -The provided Conceptual Landscape Plan does not appear to be prepared by a licensed landscape architect as is regwred Include a single landscape legend/chart showing all plant materials, their speces, size, amounUnumber, and percentage. 8 setback requarementt(from 35 feet t 3ltfeet ontl9th Street and f oIm 35 feet tlo 17 feet on Hellman Avenue) The tustification should relate directly to the five legal findings requved • by state law to grant a Variance. 9. Additional plasters shown on elevations for the typical perimeter wall must be shown in plan. B. Technical Issues -The following preliminary technical issues are minimum code regwrements, which must be satisfied before the protect can be recommended for approval to the Planning Commission. It is recommended that these issues be addressed in the revised plans: 1. The provided summary table does not provide suffiaent detal on the regwred and provided amounts for all open space categories in a fashion that shows compliance. (e.g., Common open space minimum is 30 perceet and the chart appears to show that only 24.8 percent is provided.) lithe protect design does not comply, then additional Variances will be needed 2 The walls around the spa area do not appear to meet the minimum safety fenang regwrements. Please correct. C Design Issues -The following are preliminary design issues that are recommended to be addressed in the revised plans: 1 Architecture -The elevations still appear rather generic and would benefit from a better defined architectural style. The design would benefit from a richer incorporation of detals and features of the chosen architectural desigNtheme. Shadow patterns created by architectural elements such as, overhangs, protection, or recession of stones, balconies, reveals, and awnings contribute to the character of a bulling whle aiding in climate control. Provide architectural treatment to all elevations (i.e., 360-degree architecture). The mass • and scale of the bulling should be proportionate to the site, open spaces, street location, and surrounding developments All the attached projects adjacent tothe existingone-story, ~-jg COMPLETENESS COMMENTS • DRC2003-00957 -VILLAGE GREEN RESIDENCE October 27, 2004 Page 3 general comoatibdity It is unclear from the submitted information as to whether this design issue has been addressed. Explore a mixture of roof heights and massing to alleviate the appearance of bulk along the mtenor property Imes. 2. Provide a second matenal on the extenor finish m the revised drawings -the amount of stone product added is negligible and not ewdent on all elevations. 3. Several elevations of the large membertrellis structures at the entrance do not match each other. The side of the trellis rafters are seen from both sides, rather than seeing them on one side and rafter ends on the other III. Enaineenna Diwsion - (Willie Valbuena) (9091477-2740 ext 4026: See attached comments IV. Building and Safety Division - (Trano Huynh) (909) 477-2710, ext 4200: . If the protect is approved, then the following plan check regwrements wdl apply: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) A. General Reguvements: Submit five complete sets of plans mcludmg the followmg~ a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable); c. Floor Plan, d Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); e Electncal Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single Ime diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, mcludmg isometncs, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and • g. Planning Department Protect Number (i e., DRC2003-00957) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a sods report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred pnor to plan check submittal. E-3~ COMPLETENESS COMMENTS DRC2003-00957-VILLAGE GREEN RESIDENCE October 27, 2004 Page 4 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City pnor to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls. • B. SiteSite pe~ment. 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved pnor to construction. All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (~ e , DRC2003-00957). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of the permit application. Contact the Budding and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2 he applicant shall payfdevelopmlen f eeslat the est bl shed rate PSuch fe s may nolu'de, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the School Fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division pnor to permit issuance. 3 The Building and Safety Official shall provide street addresses after tract/parcel map• recordation and pnor to issuance of the budding permits. 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of B:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public counter). 6. Submit pool plans to the County of San Bernardmo's Environmental Health Services Department for approval. C. NewNew S__ fractures: 1. Provide compliance with the CBC for property line clearances considenng use, area, and fue-resistiveness 2. Provide compliance with the CBC for regwred occupancy separations. 3. Roofing matenal shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind° instructions. 4 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not exceed 3,000 square feet, m accordance with the CBC, Section 1505. 5. Provide draft stops m attics m Ime with common walls. 6. Extenor walls shall be constructed of the regwred fve rating in accordance with CBC Tablq~ 5-A. L~ COMPLETENESS COMMENTS DRC2003-00957 -VILLAGE GREEN RESIDENCE • October 27, 2004 Page 5 7 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected m accordance with CBC 5-A. 8. If the area of habitable space above the first floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the construction type shall be V-1 hour minimum g. Walls and floors separating dwelling units m the same budding shall not be less than 1-hour fire-resistnre construction. D. Gradm 1 Grading of the subject property shall be m accordance with CBC, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be m substantial conformance with the approved Grading Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading Plan Check. • 4. The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official pnorto the issuance of budding permits. 5. A separate Grading Plan Check Submittal is regwred for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fdl. The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Cahfomia registered Civil Engineer E. Other: 1 The project shall fully comply with accessibility requirements of the 2001 CBC, Chapter 11 A (Housing Accessibility). V. Fire Prevention/New Construction Umt - (Moises Eskenazi) (909) 477-2770: See attached comments (same as previous comments). • ~-~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • ENGINEERING DIVISION Project No. DRC2003-00957 PROJECT COMPLETENESS COMMENTS Type Condo Uni Location NEC 19 Street & Hellman Avenue APN 201-47410 To Planning Division: Vance Pomerod 0 P & E Meeting: 9-28-04 By:Willie Val uena Ckd: Yes X No, Accepted as COMPLETE A. Comaleteness -additional information that must be submitted prior to finding the application complete 1, Detailed Site Plan and Conceptual Grading Plan shall include typical street sections 2 (m n mumaandrma xmulm conditions); shade pavements areas anduslopes 3:1 or steeper 3 The drive approach7he rald usr"R" of thescurbPetum' shaldl equal heed lance (commercial type). • from the curb face to the near edge of sidewalk with a minimum of 6.5 feet and a maximum of 20 feet q. Submit a tentative Vact map for condominium purposes 5 pumpmgt Drams to Ocean)tand Drann Insehrts^~a~stBMP's Sa d inserts9 o be o installed on-site. g Prehmmarv Conditions of Aooroval 1 19"' Street frontage improvements to be m accordance with City "Secondary Arterial" standards, including: a Protect existing curb and gutter or repair, as required. b Prowde property Ime adtacent sidewalk, as required. c Provide one (1) 9500 Lumens HPSV street light d, Modify or relocate existing traffic signal equipment, as required. e Prowde traffic signage and striping, as required. • t of 3 ~-~a • f, There shall be no driveway access from 19"' Street g, Protect existing R26(s) signs or replace, as regwred. h Replace existing dnve approach with new curb and gutter to match existing. p, Hellman Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Collector Residential" standards, including gutter and property line adjacent sidewalk, as required. Provide curb , a, b, Provide one(1) 5800 Lumens HPSV sVeet light. c Provide traffic signage and striping, as required d Protect existing R26(s) signs or replace, as required. e Replace existing dnve approaches with new curb and gutter to match existing. 3, An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing mmunications and electrical, except for the 66 KV l eco overhead utilities (te electrical) on the protect side of 19"' Street shall be paid to the City prior to ll be the Cdy adopted unit amount h . a issuance of budding permits. The fee s times the length from the center of Hellman Avenue to the east project boundary. q, An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing mmunications and electrical, except for the 66 KV l eco overhead utilities (te electrical) on the protect side of Hellman Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to The fee shall be the City adopted amount Lines the issuance of building permts. length from the center of 19"' Street to the north project boundary. 5 Any power pole relocation shall be paid for and coordinated by the developer. o and disposal of surface fr l t e 6 om adtacent t tect s te ng the pro enten draenage 7 Comer property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to one foot behind the g sidewalk along all street frontages. g Prior to the issuance of budding permits, a Diversion Deposit and related es shall be paid for the ConstrucLon and DemoliLon Diversion f t ive e administra oliLon are di erteld from0landfillsl andtappropnateed d n em g constructs nand duri documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shal tion smsubmitted to • ica Engineering Division when the first budding permit app rm CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Dvision F o Building and Safety 2 of 3 ~-~,j within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition • project 10. Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated cost of operating all street lights during the first six months of operation, prior to budding permit issuance or approval of the final map, whichever occurs first. 11 A signed consent waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate landscape and I fighting districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of budding permits, whichever occurs first 12. The citywide Transportation Development Fee, covering the City adopted estimated costs to mitigate the traffic impacts of new development, shall be paid upon issuance of bwlding permits 13. Street improvement plans, prepared by a registered Ciwl Engineer, shall be submiried to and approved by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed in public rights-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Cdy Engineer's office. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to final map approval. 14 Install missing street trees along the protect frontages per the "Street Tree Requirements Forrn" Rewse existing improvement plans as needed. • 3 of 3 C~ r st~?;~G - §::6~ ,. ~, • rt~~ Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Fire Construction Services REVIEW COMMENTS Apn121, 2004 Village Green Residences 6695 Hellman (2) Duplex Buildings DRC2003-00957, DRC2003-00518, DRC2003-00253 Fue Constmcaon Servtces has reviewed your plans subrmtted for Development Review. This prolect review was b1ashed5 aareefootage of each Building was n(ot hown nth P~Sn a single lot possible R-3 occupanry• 9 The project has been determined to be incomplete for the following reasons: 1. Ftre Dtsmct fees are due 2 Proof of the available fire flow must be subrmtted 3 Ftre Department access is not acceptable as subrmtted 4 Reaprocal agreements aze requued for fire department access and wares supply. • The speufics of the buildings on tlvs prolect, such as occupanry, squaze footage, hetght, number of stones and type of construction were not found on the plans Fue Construction Servtces requees thts informaaon to provide the apphcant with a complete revtew and apphcable comments. Please provide the necessary building data on your next subauttal When all of the above outstanding Ftre Distract Issues have been resolved, your prolect will be deemed complete by the Fue Dtstnct and wtth the approval from all of the other Ctty Dtvtstons; a may advance to the next step in the process Please contact Moises Eskenazt, Sr. Plans Examrner at 909-477-2710 ext. 4209 to answer any questions or set-up an appointment as necessary. Reference the following brief description of the outstanding issues and instructions on how to resolve them. Fo ~ Dos bt the n Eessary paper R,or btoppay the outstanding fire fees on thrs p olectn Setvtces (FCS) PROOF OF AVAILABLE FIRE FLOW must be obtained from the Cucamonga County Water Dtstnct (CCWD) The apphcant must contact CCWD's Engineering Department located at 10440 Ashford Street, Rancho Cucamonga They may be contacted by calling 909-987-2591 Theo office hours aze Monday through Friday, 7.30 a m to 5 30 p m Allow suffiaent tune fox CCWD to perform the test and produce a letter confirming the available fire flow The apphcant must submit the proof of the fire flow letter to the FCS counter .The letter must be current (vnthm one-yeaz of the request) and be site speafic. When FCS . receroes the letter, t}us fire flow Item will be deemed complete only tf the available fire flow, as stated on the CCWD letter, meets or exceeds the fire flow requued for the building in accordance anth the Cahfoaua Ftre Code Ftre flow is a requirement of the Cahforma Ftre Code Secaon 903 and Appendix III-A The requued fire flow for your prolect will be determined when the squaze footage of each building is provided. This fire flow may be reduced by up to 50%, if the building will be egrnpped with an automaac fire sprinkler system m accordance anth NFPA ]3R or NFPA 13D system E~JS n....e t ~o~ THE FIRE DEPARTMENT~IERGENCY ACCESS as subirutted ~ not comply anth the mirnmum requirements established by the RCFPD Fire Access/Fire Lane Standazd You aze required to change your design to comply wtth the Standazd As an opaon, you may choose to rrungate the Fire Department Emergency Access with the FCS staff and the Fire Mazshal The defiaenry tssues regazdmg the . fire access aze A A maxirnum made turning radius of 20' and a mirumum outside turning rachus of 46' is require at all the fire lane rums Prior to resubmitting to the Planning Division for further review, please prepaze a fire depamnent access plan m accordance to RCFPD standazd 9-7 mdtcatmg the location of the proposed Fire Department Emergsh it f om other Goads on the ate plan ~ the Standazd Please shade the proposed fire lane to distmgut RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emugenry Access and Water Supply are required on this protect The project's FD access appears to be located on cotnmoffpnvate property A reaprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners Fire Construcaon Services shall approve the agreement poor to recordation If the document cannot be prepared before the planning Drvision's deadlines please contact FCS to mrtigate the time frame. • E -L{J/P Page 2 of 2 WIIILIM) ALFJCANDER Mayor ProTrm DIANE WII.LAFI$ Caunnlmrni m REx GtmeaxEz L DENNIS MIC11AEi. $AM $PAGNOl.O Crry Managrr 1 THE CITY OF RANCHO Ct)CAMONGA JACx LAmt, AICP RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA Apnl 21, 2005 George Ayad Jaber 13224 E. Valley Boulevard La Puente, CA 91746 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00957 -VILLAGE GREEN RESIDENCES Dear Mr. Jaber. Thank you for submitting your proposed prolect We want your project to be a success, one which you and the City can be proud of. As you are already aware we have assigned a project planner, Vance Pomeroy, to assist you throughout the review process up to final occupancy. We have reviewed the application for your proposed prolect for completeness and accuracy of filing and determined it to be incomplete for processing Attached is a list of InfornaUon needed pnor to finding the application complete. Further processing of your prolect will begin once the Completeness Items an: submitted and the application accepted as complete We recommend that all issues on the attached list be addressed now to expedite processing of your protect. Submit eight complete sets (collated, stapled, and plans shall/ inlclude aU required pans per City's submhttaPlcheckl st0,encludingtthose that did notl~equire revision The information and/or plans necessary to make the application complete must be received wkhin 60 days from the date of this letter. This determination of incompleteness is final unless appealed within ten calendar days from the date of this must be filed w th Ithe Planning Commbssion Secretary with a $1 537 appeal feent of reasons for the appeal To expedite the process, please use the case numbers listed in the Subject header above when corresponding with or contacting staff. Should you have any questions regarding the review process, or if we can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact the protect planner at (909) 477-2750, Monday through Thursday from 7 a m to 6 p.m. To meet with your project planner, please call ahead for an appointment at a convenient time. DC:VPtma Attachment cc Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer Moises Eskenazi, Senior Plans Examiner ~._(~Q~ 10500 Crv~c Center Dr • PO Box 807 • Rancho Cuamonga, CA 91729-0607 •'Tel 909177-2700 • Fax 9091177-2649 • ~'w'w'G ranchotueamotga.t~.us ~ ,for Pnncipal Planner FILE NO.: DRC2003-00957 INCOMPLETENESS COMMENTS NOTE: This information is provided to assist in the preparation of a development package complete for processing. Additional information or comments may be necessary based upon a more thorough analysis during the Development Review Process. Tips for a Successful Process: A. Neighborhood Meeting - For infill projects that are adtacent to residential areas, the applicant is responsible for conducting a neighborhood meeting to explain the project, present draHnngs, and obtain input from surrounding residents. See attached handout on procedures. B Address Technical and Design Issues as early in the process as possible. C. Identify one person for overall coordination between your professional design team and to serve as the key contact person vwth City staff. D. Revise all plans to be consistent and to reflect staffs comments. E Carefully review the Development Review Checklist submittal requirements. F Provide an itemized narrative response to this letter for each responsible Department. i Plannino Department Nance Pomerovl (9091477-2750 ext 4325: A Incompleteness Items -Additional information that must be submitted prior to finding the • application complete 1 described on the attacFhedu"Fd rig Procedures) For Supp emeonltal Notice Requ rements: as a. Large 4-foot by 8-foot Notification Sign(s) shall be posted on-site. Although a Sign Penrnt was obtained, the sign erected at this site does not have the right information on it It says there is a "Proposed New Srngle-Family Residence" to be built there. Also, the general condition of the sign (falling over and tagged Hnth graffiti) should be remedied See the requirements attached. 2. Tentative Parcel Map and $2,514 fee must be submitted to create condominwm ownership as requested. (Third notation) 3 Noise Study- Revise the Site Plan to include the mitigation measures recommended in the noise study. The sound walls described in the acoustical mitigation measures are 6 feet high -the walls on the Site Plan are 3 feet high If the mitigation measures create a condition that does not meet the development standards, alternate measures must be presented by the acoustical engineer or the project should be modified to meet the development standards. 4. Site Plan -The provided summary table on the Site Plan does not calculate correcfly (e.g., Private Open Space [POS] and Common Open Space [COS] less the COS results in noncompliant POS) and does not seem to match the plan. Provide clear dimensiona verification of compliance on the Site Plan and expanded data on the chart. E-~G8 COMPLETENESS COMMENTS ' DRC2003-00957 -VILLAGE GREEN RESIDENCES Apnl 18, 2005 Page 2 5 Conceptual Landscape Plan -The provided Conceptual Landscape Plan does not include the hentage tree replacement as descnbed in the Tree Report of January 25, 2005 Correct per replacement ratio in the report 6 Variance Reouest (DRC2004-00317)-Three vanances are required based upon the most recent Site Plan layout• 1) reduction of streetscape building setback from 45 feet to 39 feet along 19th Street frontage, 2) reduction of intenor site boundary budding setback from 15 feet to 10 feet, and 3) reduction in landscape and wall setback from required 35 feet average/25 feet minimum to 21 to 22 feet along both street frontages. Your lustificetion letter must address each vanance separately. Neitherthe Vanance application form northe Variance justification letter state the nature of the vanance requested. A detailed descnption of the request is required. A separate plan and/or elevation exhibit would assist deta wand may not provide' soffit ent find ngs for the requestlto be granteda~ing in any 7 No 1 st floor Floor Plan drawing (at same scale as the 2nd floor Floor Plan) was provided in the drawing set for review. B, Techni_ I Issues -The following preliminary technical issues an: minimum Code requirements, Co mss onb Itsstrecommeended that ~hesetssues be addressed inotheprervoisedtplans Planning 1 fromincurb face perulDevelopment (Code iTable 17 08040- etbasedguponmattached Single-Family Residential product on a secondary sVeet (also see Footnote C). 2 andie st property lines) sunder the Basic Development Standards Table 1/7!08 040 B orth 3. An average 35-foot, minimum 25-foot, landscape and wall setback is required along both street frontages. 4. The provided summary table does not calculate correctly (e g., POS and COS less the COS results in noncompliant POS) and does not seem to match the plan. Provide clear thie protect des gn dtces notocomiply, then additionaliVanances willdbe needed the chart. If 5 Amenities regwred by Section 17 OS 040 R (125 cubic feet of lockable storage and either common laundry area or laundry hook-ups in each unit) are missing from the proposal. C Desig_ n I_ slues -The following are preliminary design issues that are recommended to be addressed in the revised plans: 1 definied archit cturallst)Ae~The des gn woo d benefit from a ncherl ncorpora on of detaes and features of the chosen architectural design/theme. Shadow patterns created by . architectural elements such as overhangs, protection, or recession of stones, balconies, reveals, and awnings contnbute to the character of a building while aiding in climate control. Provide architectural treatment to all elevations (i.e , 360-degree architecture). The mass and scale of the building should be proportionate to the site, open spaces, street location, E-~y COMPLETENESS COMMENTS DRC2003-00957 -VILLAGE GREEN RESIDENCES Apnl 18, 2005 Page 3 and surrounding developments All attached projects adiacent`to existing one-Qstorv general compatibility It is unclear from the submitted information as to whetherthis gesign issue has been addressed. Explore a mixture of roof heights and massing to alleviate the appearance of bulk along the interior property Imes. 2 provide a second matenal on the extenor finish in the revised dravwngs -the amount of stone product added is negligible and not in evidence on all elevations. 3. The several elevations of the large member trellis structures at the entrance do not match each other The side of the trellis rafters are seen from both sides rather than seeing them on one side and the rafter ends on the other 4. Provide additional visitor parking. III. En ineenng De artment (Willie Valbuena) (9091477-2740, ext 4026: A. Completeness -additional information that must be submitted pnor to finding the application complete: 1 Detailed Site Plan and Conceptual Grading Plan shall include typical street sections 2. Conceptual Grading Plan shall incude nts areas and saolpese 3 1 odrasteeper.'r Indicate maximum conditions), shade paveme elevations of existing conditions on adjacent properties 3 The dnve approach on Hellman Avenue shall per City Std 101, type C (cgmmeraal type). The radius "R" of the curb return shall equal the distance from the curb face to the near edge of sidewalk with a minimum of 6.5 feet and a maximum of 20 feet 4 Submit a tentative tract map for condominium purposes. 5. Submit a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that follows current WQMP templates/gwdance and regulations set forth by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWCB) Access the follovwng website for an updated San Bernardino County WQMP for New Development and Redevelopment Projects. http.//www.swrcb.ca goy/rwgcb6/html/sb wgmp html This site provides Guidance and Templates that can be filled out electronically and punted Adhere to these guidelines and use the templates provided Also, include the Best Management Practices identified m the plan on Grading Plans when submitted for plan check. B Preliminary Conditions of Approval 1 19th Street frontage improvements are to be in accordance vnth City "Secondary Artenal" standards including. a Protect existing curb and gutter or repair, as regwred. b Provide property line adjacent sidewalk, as regwred ~-'.~~ COMPLETENESS COMMENTS ' DRC2003-00957 -VILLAGE GREEN RESIDENCES April 18, 2005 . Page 4 c Prowde one 9500 Lumens HPSV street light d, Modify or relocate existing traffic signal equipment, as requved. e. Provide traffic signage and striping, as regwred. f, There shall be no driveway access from 19th Street. g. Protect existing R26(s) signs or replace, as regwred. h. Replace existing drive approach with new curb and gutter to match existing 2. Hellman Avenue frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Collector Residential" standards, including: a Provide curb, gutter, and property line adiacent sidewalk, as regwred. b. Prowde one 5800 Lumens HPSV street light c Prowde traffic signage and striping, as regwred d. Protect existing R26(s) signs or replace, as regwred. • e. Replace existing drive approaches with new curb and gutter to match existing. 3 An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the ex~sUng overhead utilities t for the 66 KV electrical) on the project side of xce l p , e (telecommurncations and electrica 19th SVeet shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of budding permits. The fee shall be center of Hellman Avenue to the east th f e rom the City adopted unit amount times the length protect boundary. 4 An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities the 66 KV electrical) on the protect side of f or (telecommurncations and electrical, except Hellman Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of budding permits. The fee shall th from the center of 19th Street to the north be the City adopted amount times the leng project boundary 5 Any power pole relocation shall be paid for and coordinated by the developer. 6 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the project site from adjacent lots 7 Comer property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 8 Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of the curb to 1-foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages. g. Prior to the issuance of budding permits, a Diversion Deposit and related admirnsVative fees l u l d r t D o n moli de construction an enerat d dunng stes g refulndable ifat least 50 percent of all wa ~~ COMPLETENESS COMMENTS DRC2003-00957 -VILLAGE GREEN RESIDENCES • Apnl 18, 2005 Page 5 are diverted from landfills, and appropnate documentation is provided to the City. Forn CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engmeenng Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Department Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engmeenng Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect 10. Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covenng the estimated cost of operating all street lights dunng the first six months of operation, pnor to building permit issuance or approval of the final map, whichever occurs first. 11 A signed consent waiver form to torn and/or form the appropnate landscape and lighting distncts shall be filed with the City Engineer pnor to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. 12. The citywide Transportation Development Fee, covenng the City adopted estimated costs to mitigate the traffic impacts of new development, shall be paid upon issuance of building permits. 13. Street Improvement Plans, prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Pnor to any work being performed in public nghts-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineers office Secunty shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to final map approval. 14. Install missing street trees along the protect frontages per the "Street Tree Requirements Forth " Revise existing improvement plans as needed IV. Buddino ano sarerv uepanmern- i ~ ~ a,.u then the following plan check requirements will If the protect is approved, NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) , A General Requirements. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following. Site/Plot Plan, Foundation Plan and Reverse Foundation Plan (when applicable); c. Floor Plan, d Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable), e. Electncal Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of sernce entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; ~~a COMPLETENESS COMMENTS DRC2003-00957 -VILLAGE GREEN RESIDENCES Apnl 18, 2005 Page 6 f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometncs, undergroun as~ag inm and heating waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, g p p 9~ and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Project Number (DRC2003-00957) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a sods report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fenang and/or walls. B. Site Develop. 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i e., DRC2003-00957). The applicant shall comply vnth the latest adopted California Codes, and a ilcaUon a Contact the Buildng and Safety regulations in effect at the Ume of permit app Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Pnor to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to• City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Develo of the school feelsa eceipt to the Bu Iding and Safety Departmlent pno rtopperrrit a copy issuance. 3 The Budding and Safety Official shall provide street addresses after tract/parcel map recordation and pnor to issuance of budding permits 4 through Saturday,lv~nth No construct on on Sunday or holidays P.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public counter) 6 Submit pool plans to the County of San Bemardino's Environmental Health Services Department for approval C New S_ truce 1 Provde compliance with the California Budding Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance wdh the California Bwlding Code for regwred occupancy separations. ~fi3 COMPLETENESS COMMENTS DRC2003-00957 -VILLAGE GREEN RESIDENCES Apnl 18, 2005 Page 7 3 Roofing matenal shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions 4 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC Section 1505 5 Provde draft stops in attics in line with common walls 6. Extenorwalls shall be constructed of the regwred fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. 7. Openings in extenor walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC 5-A 8 If the area of habitable space above the first floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the construction type shall be V-1 Hour minimum. g Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be not less than 1-hour fire-resistive construction. D Gradin 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final Grading Plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved Grading Plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading Plan check. 4 subm ttedgandl approved by the Bu dCngfand Safety Offic a'I pnorto th Sssuance off bui ding permits 5. A separate Grading Plan Check Submittal is regwred for all new construction projects and moee oflcombineldcu and fill. The G ad ng Plann shallbe preparednstamped and signed by a CaOfomia registered Civil Engineer. E Other • 1. Protect shall fully comply with accessibility requirements of 2001 California Building Code Chapter 11A (Housing Accessibility) V Fire Prevention/New Construction Unit - (Moises Eskenazi) (909) 477-2770• See attached comments E ~~ - ~ - Rand Cucamonga Fire Pi~tection District .~N~N„ ' ~ Fire Construction Services -~• . REVIEW COMMENTS Apn118, 2005 Village Green Restdences 6695 Hellman (2) Duplex Buildings DRC2003-00957, DRC2003-00518, DRC2003-00253 Fire Construction Services has reviewed your plans submitted for Development Review. Tins protect review was based on the plans subtmtted which reflect (2) Duplex buildings on a single lot possible R-3 occupanry• The project has been determined to be incomplete for the following reasons: 1 Frre Dtsmct fee is due. 2 Proof of the available fire flow must be submitted 3. Fue Department access is not acceptable as subtmtted 4 Reuprocal agreements aze required for fire department access and water supply The speafics of the buildings on this protect, such as occupancy, squaze footage, height, number of stones • and type of construction were not found on the plans Ftre Construction Services requees this mfortnanon to provide the apphcant with a complete review and apphcable comments Please provide the necessary building data on your next submtttaL When all of the above outstanding Fue Dtsmct issues have been resolved, your protect will be deemed complete by the Fue Dtsmct and with the approval from all of the other Cary Divisions, tt may advance to the next step in the process Please contact Moises Eskenazi, Sr. Plans Examiner at 909-477-2710 ext. 4209 to answer any questions or set-up an appointment as necessary. Reference the following brief descriptioa of the outstanding issues and instructions on how to resolve them. FIRE DISTRICT FEES of $82 00 must be paid. Please proceed to the Fue Construction Services (FCS) counter to obtain the necessary paper work to pay the outstaadutg fire fees on this protect PROOF OF AVAILABLE FIRE FLOW must be obtained from the Cucamonga County Water Dtsmct (CCWD) The apphcaat must contact CCWD's Engineering Department located at 10440 Ashford Street, Rancho Cucamonga. They may be contacted by calling 909-987-2591• Theo office hours aze Monday through Fnday, 7.30 a m to 5.30 p.m Allow suffiuent trine for CCWD to perform the test and produce a letter confitrnmg the available fire flow. The apphcant must subtmt the proof of the fire flow letter to the FCS counter. The letter must be cuaeat (within one-yeaz of the request) and be site speafic. When FCS receives the letter, this Ste flow item will be deemed complete only tf the available fue flow, as stated on the CCWD letter, meets or exceeds the fire flow requtred for the building in accordance with the Cahforn~a Fue Code Fue flow is a requirement of the Cahforma Fite Code Section 903 and Appendix III-A The required fire flow for your protect will be detemuned when the squaze footage of each building is provided. This fire flow tray be reduced by up to 50%, tf the bwlding will be equipped with an automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13R or NFPA 13D system ~~5 Page 1 of 2 THE FIRE DEPARTMEN~MERGENCY ACCESS as submitted~es not comply with the minimum requirements established by the RCFPD Fue Access/Fue lane Standazd You aze requued to change your design to comply with the Standard As an option, you may choose to mitigate the Fue Department Emergenry Access with the FCS staff and the Fue MazshaL The deficienry issues regazdmg the . Ere access aze: A. A maximum inside turning radius of 20' and a miiumum outside turning radius of 4b' ss require at all the fire lane rums. Prior to resubmitting' to the Planning Division for further review, Please Prepare a fire department access plan m accordance to RCFPD standard 9-7 indicating the location of the proposed Fue Department Emergency Access Roadways in compliance with the Standard. Please shade the proposed fire lane to distinguish it from other roads on the sue plan. RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fue Department Emergenry Access and Water Supply aze regiured on this protect The project's FD access appears to be located on common pnvate property. A reciprocal agreement is requued to be recorded between property owners. Fue Constmcaon Services shall approve the agreement poor to recordation. If the document cannot be prepazed before the planning Division's deadlines please contact FCS to mitigate the time frame. r~ L E -~ Page 2 of 2 Mayor WILLwM J ALEXANDER Moyar ProTnn DUNE WIU.IAMs Counnlmcmbns • REx GunERnPz L DENN1s MICHAEL SAM $PAGNOLO Gry Managn JACK LAM, AICP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RANaxo C,,UCAMONGA u • January 23, 2006 George Ayad Jaber 13224 E. Valley Boulevard La Puente, CA 91746 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00957 -VILLAGE GREEN RESIDENCES Dear Mr. Jaber: Based upon a review of your application file, staff has determined that it has now been more than 9 received the requested plansiand/or inforrnaton o ~a etter of withdrawal d to date, the City has not Therefore, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.04 020.8 Your applicaUOn has been denied without prefudice to refire at a later date. This decision shall be final following aten-day appeal penod beginning with the date of this letter Appeals must be filed in writing with the Planning Commission Secretary, state the reason for the appeal, and be accompanied by a $1,605 appeal fee. plannerV once Pomegroysof our officer at (909)b477 27150Sext. 4325 eMontday through tThursday tiowoan the hours of 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. DC:VP/ge cc: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer Moises Eskenazi, Senior Plans Examiner 10500 Gnc Ccntcr Dr • PO Boz 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 •~ 9~ 77'2700 • Fax 909-477-2849 • ~'~'~' u rancho-Cucamonga u us 6 Dan Coleman Acting City Planner C Doja, Inc. . Engineering Contractors License No. 597764 Date: January 26, 2006 To: The Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Attn: Dan Coleman Acting Ctty Planner Re: Development Review DRC2003-00957 -Village Green Residences Dear Mr Coleman, I am in receipt of your letter dated January 23, 2006 canceling review of the Proposed Village Green Residence Protect This proposed protect is supposedly the first of its kind that my fo~ the cnysof RtC [Being new and naive about [het trocmes and cltallue gtes that IaYS ahead[, Doha Ronnebeck have to rely on the services of the arohitect, Pete Volbeda and the civil engineerlrea~d took some Engineenng to go thru the vanous processes required by the city Indeed, Y valuable time to prepare and subinit the requirements imtially required to process this application. At this point in time, I already spent nearly $10,000.00 representing dues to the arclutecUengineer as well as other preliminary fees I tned contacting the architect, Pete Volbeda, but unfortunately he is out of town and will be back next Monday, January 30, 2006 The Ctvtl Engineer, Jeny Ronnebeck is very difficult to reach and have left messages after messages m his office. 1 am now caught in a very strange situation wherein all the efforts and resoiuces I have invested on this protect wdl go down the dram prepare and submrtp he requvements that your otffice needtto ont nuetthe developmental review process Under these circumstances I am hoping that your office will be more considerate and understanding and would grant this request. Sincerely Georg abet Owner Deve per 13224 E Valley Blvd. La Puente Ca 91746 Tel (626) 369-9573 Fax 626 369 6193 • G-~ RESOLUTION NO 06-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE DECISION OF THE CITY PLANNER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00957, A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF 4 CONDOMINIUM RESIDENTIAL UNITS, TO INCLUDE TWO DUPLEX BUILDINGS, ON 59 NET ACRE OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (5-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 19TH STREET AND HELLMAN AVENUE, IN RESPONSE TO AN APPEAL OF A CITY PLANNER DENIAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF THE SAME REQUEST, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0201-474-10 A Rentals 1 George Jaber filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2003-00957 as described in the title of this Resolution, on September 25, 2003 Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subject Development Revew request is referred to as "the application " 2 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department staff reviewed the submitted application to determine if the application was complete in October 2003, and determined that the application was incomplete The applicant was sent a notice of this determination 3 The applicant responded on March 29, 2004, by providing a re-submittal for review to determine if the revised application was complete City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department staff determined that the revised application was incomplete The applicant was sent a notice of this determination 4 The applicant responded on September 20, 2004, byproviding a re-submittal for review to determine if the revised application was complete City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department staff determined that the revised application was incomplete The applicant was sent a notice of this determination 5 The applicant responded on March 24, 2005, by providing a re-submittal for review to determine if the revised application was complete City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department staff determined that the revsed application was incomplete The applicant was sent a notice of this determination on April 21, 2005 6 The City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department received no revised plans, nor any communication from the applicant or his representatives for over nine months after the last notice was sent 7 Consequently, and in accordance with Section 17 04 020 B of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code (RCMC), the City Planner issued a letter dated January 23, 2006, notifying the applicant that the application had been denied without prejudice to the applicant's right to re-apply for the same permit The applicant was also informed of the appeal nghts associated with the denial 8 On January 30, 2006, the applicant filed an appeal of the City Planner deasion with the Planning Commission secretary within the ten day appeal period ~~~ 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-15 CONSIDERATION OR APPEAL FOR DRC2003-00957 -AYAD JABER March 8, 2006 Page 2 9 On the 8th day of March 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a hearing on the appeal from the City Planner decision and concluded said hearing on that date 10 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced hearing of the appeal on March 8, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to the property located at the northeast corner of Hellman Avenue and 19th Street with a street frontage of 130 feet and lot depth of 199 feet, and review it, and The application was found to be incomplete on all four of the opportunities given to The applicant allowed the 60-day time limit to respond to lapse on all four occasions, and d The applicant had no contact with the Planning Department afterthe fourth letter of incompleteness was sent, and e In accordance with Section 17 04 020 B a of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the following Information, which is to be supplied by the applicant and is necessary to prepare a legally adequate environmental document, was not received as a part of the most recent re-submittal package and amount to an applicable reason for denial of the application Noise Study -Revise the Site Plan to include the mitigation measures recommended in the noise study The sound walls described in the acoustical mitigation measures are 6 feet high -the walls on the Site Plan are 3 feet high If the mitigation measures create a condition that does not meet the development standards, alternate measures must be presented by the acoustical engineer or the protect should be modified to meet the development standards f In accordance with Section 17 04 020 B c of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the following information, without which the City's decision to approve a project would not be supported by substantial evidence, was not received as a part of the most recent re-submittal package and amount to an applicable reason for denial of the application i Supplemental Notice Regwrements -For infill protects, the following items are regwred as described on the attached "Fling Procedures For Supplemental Notice Requirements " c-6o PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-15 CONSIDERATION OR APPEAL FOR DRC2003-00957 - AYAD JABER March 8, 2006 Page 3 Large 4-foot by 8-foot Notification Sign(s) shall be posted on-site Although a Sign Permit was obtained, the sign erected at this site does not have the correct information on it It says there is a "Proposed New Single-Family Residence" to be built there Also, the general condition of the sign (falling over and tagged with graffiti) should be remedied u Tentative Parcel Map and application fee must be submitted to create condominium ownership as requested m Site Plan -The provided summary table on the Site Plan does not calculate correctly (e g ,Private Open Space [POS] and Common Open Space [COS] less the COS results m noncompliant POS) and does not seem to match the plan Provide clear dimensional verification of compliance on the Site Plan and expanded data on the chart iv Conceptual Landscape Plan -The provided Conceptual Landscape Plan does not include the heritage tree replacement as described m the Tree Report of January 25, 2005 Correct per replacement ratio m the report v Variance Request (DRC2004-00317)-Three variances are regwred based upon the most recent Site Plan layout 1) reduction of streetscape budding setback from 45 feet to 39 feet along 19th Street frontage, 2) reduction of interior site boundary budding setback from 15 feet to 10 feet, and 3) reduction in landscape and wall setback from required 35 feet average/25 feet minimum to 21 to 22 feet along both street frontages Your tustification letter must address each variance separately Neitherthe Variance application form nor the Variancetustification letter state the nature of the Variance requested A detailed description of the request is required A separate plan and/or elevation exhibit would assist m the description The justification for the Variance is generally weak and lacking m any details, and may not provide suffiaent findings for the request to be granted vi A 1 st floor Floor Plan drawing (at same scale as the 2nd floor Floor Plan) was not provided in the drawing set for review vii The Detailed Site Plan and Conceptual Grading Plan shall include typical street sections wu The Conceptual Grading Plan shall include cross sections at all site boundaries (minimum and maximum conditions), shade pavements areas and slopes 3 1 or steeper Indicate elevations of existing conditions on adjacent properties ix The drive approach on Hellman Avenue shall be per City Standard 101, type C (commercial type) The radius "R" of the curb return shall equal the distance from the curb face to the near edge of the sidewalk with a minimum of 6 5 feet and a maximum of 20 feet x Submit a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that follows current WQMP templates/guidance and regulations set forth by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board Access the following website for an updated San Bernardino County WQMP for New Development and Redevelopment Projects http //www swrcb ca gov/rwgcb8/html/sb_wgmp html This site provides Gwdance and Templates that can be filled out electronically and panted Adhere to these gwdelines and use the templates provided Also, include the Best Management Practices . (BMPs) identified in the plan on Grading Plans when submitted for plan check xi Fire District fee is due E-~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-15 CONSIDERATION OR APPEAL FOR DRC2003-00957 -AYAD JABER March 6, 2006 Page 4 xu Proof of the available fire flow must be submitted xui Fire Department access is not acceptable as submitted xiv Reaprocal agreements are requued for fire department access and water supply g The City Planner made no error in denying the application under the provisions of Section 17 04 020 B of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced hearing on the appeal and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That Development Review DRC2003-00957 application is determined to be incomplete, and b The applicant failed to respond to the determination and that the application was incomplete within the regwsite 60 days, and c Development Review application DRC2003-00957 was correctly denied by the City Planner without pretudice to the applicant's right to reapply for the same permit 4 Based upon the findings and conclusions setforth in Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby sustains the decision of the City Planner as set fofohthe same ttermdf • January 23, 2006, to deny without pretudice to the applicant's nght to re-apply P 5 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF MARCH 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of March 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS • ABSENT COMMISSIONERS c~~ SIGN-IN SHEET PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 8, 2006 NAME COMPANY ADDRESS ,`per ~~ V~~3 ~ "~LI' I--fj ~~I ~ h I S IJ '~~ S o ~.1 -H ~ ~ ~~~