HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006/05/10 - Agenda Packet,r-
J
•
•
C~
~~
~P'?c
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA
RANCHO MAY 10, 2006 - 7:00 PM
CUCAMONGA
Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
Council Chambers
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California
I. CALL TO ORDER
Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call
Chairman Stewart_ Vice Chairman Maaas _
Fletcher _ McPhail _ Munoz _
II. ANNOUNCEMENTS
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
April 12, 2006 Regular Meeting Minutes
April 26, 2006 Regular Meeting Minutes
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendaritems are expected to be routine and non-controversial
They will be acted on by the Commission atone time without discussion If anyone has
concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their
opinion of the related protect Please wait to be recognrzed by the Chairman and
address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be
limited to 5 minutes per individual for each protect Please sign in after speaking
-~.
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
MAY 10, 2006
G'U~CONGA 2
A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
SUBTPM17423 - CIP REAL ESTATE - A request to subdivide 3 37 net
acres of land Into a single parcel for 26 condominium units in the Haven
Avenue Overlay District (Subarea 6), located at the northeast corner of
Haven Avenue and Trademark Parkway - APN 0210-081-017 Related
Flie Development Review DRC2005-00585 Staff has prepared a
Negative Declaration of environmental Impacts for consideration Thls
item Is re-advertised from the April 12, 2006 meeting
VI. COMMISSION BUSINESS
VII. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be
discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m
ad/oumment time If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent
of the Commission
1, Lois J Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was
posted on May 4, 2006, at least 72 hours poor to the meeting per Government Code
Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamon
Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers whsle the meeting is in session
Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at
http•Ilwww a rancho-cucamonga ca us
ou need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting,
If
y
please contact the Planning Division at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours
prior tc the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to
®
ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired
•
•
.~
Vicinity Map
Planning Commission
May 10, 2006
•
Q
N
~ Meeting Location:
City Hall
10500 Civic Center Dnve
•
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
' HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
AGENDA
Cu~ oNCn MAY 10, 2006 7:00 PM
Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
Council Chambers
70500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California
MEETING CANCELED
NO ITEMS SUBMITTED
Lois J Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
1
,
or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was
posted on May 4, 2006, at least 72 hours pnor to the meeting per Government Code
Secbon 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga
/~-~ ~L.
T H E C I T Y O F
R A N C h O C U C A M O N G A
Staff Report
DATE May 10, 2006
TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner
BY Douglas Fenn, Assoaate Planner, MPA
SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
SUBTPM17423 - CIP REAL ESTATE - A request to subdivide 3 37 net acres of
land into a single parcel for 26 condominium units m the Haven Avenue Overlay
Distract (Subarea 6), located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and
Trademark Parkway - APN 0210-081-017 Related File Development Review
DRC2005-00585 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental
• impacts for consideration This item is re-advertised from the April 12, 2006,
meeting
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION
A Surrounding Land Use and Zornna
North - Professional Office Park (under construction), Industnal Park and Haven
Avenue Overlay Distract (Subarea 6)
South - Vacant land, Industnal Park and Haven Avenue Overlay Distract (Subarea 6)
East - Office Buildings (Research and Development), Industnal Park and Haven
Avenue Overlay District (Subarea 6)
West - Industnal Buildings, Industrial Park and Haven Overlay Distract (Subarea 6)
B General Plan Designations
Protect Site - Industnal Park
North - Industnal Park
South - Industrial Park
East - Industrial Park
West - Industnal Park
C Site Characteristics The undeveloped portion of the site presently drains from the north
to the south With the exception of the existing street trees along Haven Avenue, there
are no other existing trees on the undeveloped portion of the site There are no mature
trees on the vacant portion of the subject site
C~
ITEM A
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
SUBTPM17423 - CIP REAL ESTATE
May 10, 2006
Page 2 •
ANALYSIS
Background/Parcel Map The Development Review DRC2005-00585 was approved by the
Planning Commission on April 12, 2006 The applicant submitted a tentative parcel map division for
the proposed buddmgs into 26 "for sale" condominiums The Development Code exempts the
project from the minimum parcel size requirements because it is a master planned development.
This item was continued to the May 10, 2006, agenda in order to complete environmental review
and the required legal noticing
General
A Design Review Committee Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17423 was part of the Design
Review Committee's (McPhail, Stewart, Coleman) review of the development portion of
the protect on January 3, and February 28, 2006, respectively The Committee
recommended approval to the Planning Commission at the February 28, 2006, meeting
A condition of approval incorporating the Committee's recommendations has been
included m the proposed Resolution of Approval
B Grading Review Committee The Grading Committee reviewed the project on
January 3, 2006 The Committee recommended approval
C Environmental Assessment Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of •
the potential environmental effects of the project Based on the findings contained m that
Initial Study, City staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that the protect
would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a
Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the
public comment penod and of the intent to adopt the Negative Declaration
D CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley
Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property
owners within a 300-foot radws of the project site
RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative
Parcel Map SUBTPM17423 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with
Acting City Planner
DC DF/ge
Attachments Exhibit A -Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17423
Exhibit B -Design Review Comments dated January 3, 2006 •
Exhibit C - In•tial Study Part I and II
Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17423
A-2
m EWt OESf~~
nHa we [CpMO ax BCtt .o]prwpa"[(ru
0.53ESSOgSMpLEls N1/MEEfl 03.o-r4~.~1
~ nwNPm ~~ u':.:,,:: ~.,~ v~E IX,
W ,.aN..m .wR <:;~3~..,.NP aR xro
-veneeN M'wnrto wrmr+: we
soi, R.i v~rnsmse.
"s +c.,.m
R3EgNCE ~~.Ea[0.'uF xal[+PSiKi
}t5E9NLE aRWP~uSmm~
IPIC 6EPNGE (pswr
MI WSSEFNEE un
•IRM£5(ANf.E
`1fiM5NN'SERNCE nIX tR [rvi+«Grmrs
marECrnav au ru .+>R~nIX nvw~
use CESK.NSrxW .~~ "°:"`
_YIMRM 1yM13 ~ +Y~[n IX~OUr~ «
em a xa,a" WvnKKp~ CCPxrgV
REmRO EwsENEnrx
" A3RxArA vrarR9.W yeEn tx[ :T'nS hV W 'auM4a <MM1
+af~w}5 ~ P[[pmrC~RH~Mpi] /~l~5 0+
~ /~/~~v vm w.1p o eia aw`"`ao .".";xea.eia"=i" ~`'"A 1z °r"
~:J rvc..w~^+rrtrt+~ x~r~ x m SK crt a +axna
~oz`"`«.r v a~w u e;eowRr ~o.w• IX
a<<~ w ~3, , . , «5,
S.w~~+ Rn MN PEi mP
-~.J- ~ __r_ ~«
I rs't°
~~.:.VENUE
~- ~r=' -
~})A HARK PAflKWAY
~ R ~ n
-~~-- -g
~ i
~~
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP No. 17423
FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES
26 UNITS PROPOSED :.
PAROEi 1 OF PAPCEI MAP NO 9498 IN THE CITY
OF RANCHO CJLAIAONCA COUNTY OF SAV DERIIARDMO
STATE OF CALIfONNIA AS PER MAP RECORDED IN SOUK
102 OF PnPCEL MAPS PAGES 2 ANp } RECORDS
OF $AA COUNTY I
1 „ ^
~~ N
'"' --~^~-- =~~ CEfY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
OF=F --~~---~.~i~«w«,.
' I
- g I:
~~
r
___''_ ~
~R__~t
,~ 'I ~i~
o_~
. ~:~ ,~
1? II
_ ~ , ~I
o-
+ . ;aa,
i
~ Y
I; -~
A I
--._ ~~~
t
DRC 2005-00585
SUBTPM17423
pv
I,
i it =
g~f
r°-- ,-
~_
isi ill. l.i's/ ~, ,+-i;
a "
~,.. -
mEYARmm
Awxinw ~mlmm TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 77423
~i arwl rn .wi .u~ i«p«i-~~«~ StONEIUVEN EItECUtIVF PARK
it ' ' I~ (' ~ I y
.If ~ ry yt ~I~
1 ~ k..
_ I _ ,
~- PARCELI ~ '
;~
~ I~~ I
,'b an' 65 y' r«.w
,,,` ~• __f'n_i_
~ ~.~ ~\ Y `VVVI _ __ _ l
~a ~AA
~ ` F /~'/ -
fi: P J F"
14` ~ ~ P
f~l •, .A;a ~ Y~
Y'
vr~~ 1_
YKWI' MAY
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS •
7.00 p m Doug Fenn January 3, 2006
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17423 -CIP
REAL ESTATE - A request to subdivide 5 61 net acres of land into a single parcel for 26
condominwm units in the Haven Avenue Overlay District (Subarea 6), located at the northeast
corner of Haven Avenue and Trademark Parkway -APN: 0210-081-017. Related file
Development Review DRC2005-00585.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00585 -CIP
REAL ESTATE -The design review of 9 professional office buildings (including 2 existing
buildings) on 5 61 net acres of land in the Haven Avenue Overlay District (Subarea 6), located
at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Trademark Parkway -APN• 0210-081-017
Related file• Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17423.
Design Parameters: The subtect site is located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and
Trademark Parkway The site is part of The Gateway master plan (see attached) and is
developed with two existing professional office buildings. A portion of the parcel to the north is
undeveloped. The proposed project would create a new master plan Although The Gateway
master plan expired, it is useful for comparison. The Gateway master plan was "intended to
encourage the development of a prestigious office park and business environment" and assures
that "a cohesive integrated development program can be achieved through the design control of •
the site plan, architecture, landscaping and protect implementation " Many of these design
controls should be continued for consistency because portions of the master plan have already
been implemented The master plan had strong identity and pedestrian orientation wherein
buildings were "clustered around plaza areas which are interconnected by walks or arcades:'
Further, the master plan emphasized only multi-story bwldings facing Haven Avenue. The
master plan called for "sophisticated style" architecture that avoids trendy themes or elements
„
The primary architectural elements, as evident in the existing buildings, will be expressed
through the use of steel, glass and concrete, in contunction with curtain wall, poured in place
and concrete tilt-up construction techrnques " Main building entrances will protect a formal
entrance statement through the use of landscape plazas, architectural articulation of building
form, and more formalized landscape planting The master plan was approved with a
three-story office building in addition to the two existing office buildings, whereas, the proposed
project features seven new buildings (four 1-story and three 2-story).
To the north is vacant land, and across the street of Winston Avenue is a vacant parcel; to the
south of Trademark parkway is vacant land; and to the west across Haven Avenue is an office
budding and vacant land The undeveloped portion of the site presently drains from the north to
the south. With the exception of the existing street trees along Haven Avenue, there are no
other existing trees on the undeveloped portion of the site There are no mature trees on the
vacant portion of the subtect site
The protect is a single-phase development The protect is to develop four single-story
professional office buildings, and three two-story office buildings which will front along Haven
Avenue The two existing professional office buildings will have a free standing architectural •
enhancement element that will reflect the proposed architectural style of the proposed buildings
The square footage of the buildings will range from 4,040 to 9,228 square feet.
EXHIBIT B A-4
DRC ACTION AGENDA
SUBTPM17423 AND DRC2005-00585 - CIP REAL ESTATE
January 3, 2006 '
• Page 2
The exterior of the existing buildings will be enhanced to match the materials of the proposed
buildings. The existing glazing will be replaced with a blue reflective color and metal accent
awning, and a stone work will clad the proposed free standing concrete panels. The proposed
buildings will have the same materials
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion
Ma1or Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion
regarding this protect
1 only Pone suOcncessf Ily outT~e hproposed Site u'Pla nshas slcattered freestandings pads
surrounded, and separated by, parking
2 palrt culah ly Bwldings 3 through 5 wh ch'wlill be~usually prominent a ong Haven Avenueerial,
3 The following enhancements are recommendations to improve the following buildings.
Buddino_s 1
• a Add a cornice element overhang on the existing building as depicted on Buildings 3
through 5
Bwldmgs 3 throuoh 5
a. The primary material should cover the entire fapade were the sections of the
bwldings are depicted with the metal canopy element This is espeaally important
were the metal canopy is over the primary entry of the bwldings
b The applicant must clarify what areas of the glazing is vision or spandrel
c feet m delpth.cThey arett oo sumalll n aelat onlltolbhe mass and s ze of the bu Idingshree
d Between Bwldmgs 4 and 5, an artistic element feature should be installed on the
west end as visible from Haven Avenue This should be incorporated as a strong
and aesthetically pleasing pedestrian plaza area
e All of the sides of the tower like elements should be glazed This will strengthen the
professional office look and, in the spent of the Planning Commission's instruction,
obtain a significant amount of glazing on professional office bwldings along the
Haven Avenue overly corridor
• Building 6 through 9
a Delete the stone material on the tower Ike element and replace all of the sides of the
tower feature with glazing
A-5
DRC ACTION AGENDA
SUBTPM17423 AND DRC2005-OO5S5 - CIP REAL ESTATE
January 3, 2006
Page 3
Because of the smaller size and scale of these buildings, the stone material should
cover the entire facade of the building sections that are not glazed This must be
done on all sides and on every building
Provide either, or a combination of, artwork, a water feature, or seating area with
decorative trellis in the pedestrian plaza between Building 6 and the existing
Budding 2.
Secondary Issues Once all of the maior issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the
Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues
1 Provide pedestrian connection from Buildings 2 and 6 to Building 7.
2 All pedestrian paths between the buildings must be of a durable decorative material and
submitted to the review committee for review and approval
3. The proposed futuristic bus shelter and shade structure should be redesigned to match
the architectural style of the protect Label materials
4. The ledge stone material board color does not match the stone color of elevations.
5 Call out the detail materials and color of the decorative pavement within drive entry throats
(outside public right-of-way)
6 An enhanced detail of the trash enclosure needs to match the architecture of the protect
Staff Recommendation• Staff recommends that the protect be revised and returned for further
review.
Attachments
Design Review Committee Action
Members Present McPhail, Stewart, Diaz
Staff Planner Doug Fenn
The applicant was instructed to redesign the Site Plan and work of the other outstanding design
items with the protect planner and return to DRC at a later date
•
•
A-6
h
•
ENVIRONMENTAL
_" - __ INFORMATION FORM
(Part I -Initial Study)
Clfy of Rancho Gv=arron9a (Please type or pent clearly using ink Use the tab key to move from one 1/ne to the next hneJ
Plarvun8 (xnson
reos~ an-z7W
Upon review of the
The purpose of this form is to inform the City, of the basic components of the prgposed
project so that the City may review the project pursuant~to City Policies, Ordinances; and
Guidelines; th~ California Environmental Quality'A~ct; and~th8 `City's• Rule3• and
Procedures to Implement CE,QA. It is important that the information requested imthis
application be provided in-fuH.
Study Part 1 and the
application,
unle55,Y71Cd~~c,~y..~~=.~rT~-_„_~: _C .. „ ~ ._ ..:-- ..~-c_ i . - ~
complete and adepuate, Tfieproject~apPlica`tion wiihnoi:beschedul __ for omm~ e _
review unless all rPguired reports are' sutiitiitted",and deemed complete for staf=f to
prepare the Ihitial Study;Part II'as~ requiieiltiy CEC1A= IrY'addition.to~lthe,filing,~fee,•the
applicant will be responsible to pay or 1•eimtiurse-the City; its agents, officers, and/or
consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations,
mitigations, ets., of an~espet:iai studies;or,rgpprts,.~- - '
ED Please note that rf is the respons/d7ity o1 the applk:anl to enswe that
staff tall not be avaAable to peAorm work requned to provxle rrusstng
the apphca
mformahon
Appbcabon Number /or the pro/ect to which this /orm pertains
Profed Title Haven Trademark Corporate Center
Name B Address ofproled owner(s) CIP Gateway 1 & 2 LLC
19762 MacArthur Blvd.
Irvine, CA 92612
C/O CIP Real Estate
Name & Address of developer or pro/ect sponsor
rTV uoal Estate
Suite 300
19762 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 300
Irvine, CA 92612
Attn: Chuck McKenna
E X H I B I T C Ludy Pant docPage 1 of 10
Rev 3/17/04
A-7
Contact Person 8 Address HPA, Znc .
4931 Birch Street
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Name & Address of person preparing this form (i/ddlerent /rom aboveJ.
Telephone Number (999) 863-1770
Mformatron indicated by an asterisk (7 is not required o/ non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by stall.
'1) Fronde a felt scale (8-12 x ») copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which mGudes the project site, and rndigte
the sde boundaries.
• ~ Prowde a set o/cola photographs that show represenlalive wows mto the sire from the north, south, east, and
west, wews mto and flan the sale from the primary access pants that serve the she; and representabva news of
sigrnficant features from the site Include a map showing bcattai of each photograph
3) PrgedLocahon(descnbe) 5.74 Acres on the Northeast corner •
of Haven Avenue and Trademark Pkwy.
4J Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach addthonal sheet d necessary) 0 21 0 - 0 81-1 7
'5) GrossSrteArea(adsgR.) 5.74 Acres / 249,790 SF
'S) Net Site Area (total site srze minus area of public streets 8 proposed
dedications) 5.61 Acres / 249,516 SF~
7) Desrnbe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the prgecf sde
(attach adddional sheet d necessary)
None
Attn: Jaime Cruz
•
A-8
• 11J Describe any noise sources and theirlevels that now affecf the site (aircraR, roadwaynase, etc) and howthey will affect
proposed uses.
Slight traffic noise from Haven Avenue which will have no affect
with the proposed use.
12) Describe the proposed pro~ec in detail This should provide an adequate desrnphon o/the site in terms o/ uPomate use
that witl result Irom the proposed profec Indicate it there are proposed phases /or development the extent of
development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each irivement. Attach adddional sheet(s) d
necessary.
Seven (7) new office buildings consisting of three (3) buildings
which are 2 stories running parallel to Haven Avenue and four (4)
buildings which are 1 story. These new buildings will compliment
the two (2) existing 1 story office buildings and complete the
develo merit of theoon-site to a campus setting.
•
>3J Desrnbe the surrounding properties, including in/ormation on plants and animals and any cuffurel, histortcat, or scenic
aspects lndxate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.J, intensity of land use (one-/amity, apartment
houses, strops, department stores, etc J and state o/ development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard etc ):
The property to the South is an under developed field consisting
of gra a vines. The property to the East is a single story
office and industrial use. The property to the North is a vacant
oarcel and is currently being developed for industrial and office
use. The ro ert to the East is new office and R & D use.
14) ill the proposed pro/ect change the pattern, scale, or character o/the surrounding general area of the project
I
A-9
g) Indude a desrnpt~on o/a!I permits which will be necessary from the Clry of Rancho Cucamorga and other governmental
agencres in order to fully Implement the protect
Grading Permit
Building Shell Permit (1 Permit for all 7
Landscape Permit
g) Desrnbe the physrcal setting of the ste as d ewsts before the prged Indudmg mformahon on topography, sal sfabrlity,
plants and aromals, mature bees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Desrnbe any ex~sbng
sfrudures on sde (mdudmg age and cond~Gon) and the use o/ the structures Attach photographs of slgnficant features
desrnbed In addition, CJte all sources W Information (~.e , gedogical and/or hydrologic studres, donc and archectog>cal
swveys, traffic studies).
The site consists of two single stor office buildings located
off Haven Avenue with access from Trademark Pkwy. North and a
secondary entrance located off Winston Avenue. The site also
consists of approximately 3.6 acres of under developed land.
The topograph is flat the soil is stable and consists of
mature landscaping. The buildings were built in 1989 and were •
constructed with storefront windows on all sides and aggregate
exterior. The buildings have new HVAC and three-ply cap sheet
roofing in excellent condition. The buildings serve office
tenants.
t p) pescnbe the known cultural and/or hlstoncal aspects of the site Gte all sources oflnfomlatwn (books, published repoRs
and oral history)
None
•
A-10
Rev 3/'17/04
1 ~~N~~Iµq~~oRMS1000tJTERVrnhal SNdy Partt docPage 3 of 1(
15) Indicate the type o/short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount How will these nose
levels aAect ad/scent properties and on-site uses What methods o/soundproofing are proposed
Typical construction noise with auto and truck traffic during
• the development phase of the project. Auto and truck traffic
with occasional trash pick up and office su 1 deliver after
construction is complete and blds. are occupied. The blds. will
wi a lnremovasand/arep~cemensomatueo~scero~ees° The site will be
'16) Indicate proposed
landscaped according to a city approved landscape plan with most
mature trees to remain. The site will be enhanced with a mixed
variety of complimentary species.
17) Ind~gte any bodies of water (including domestic water supplres) into which the site drains'
None
• 18J Indicate expelled amoun~a% e~Wate D hrct at 9879 enl A for usage estimates) For further clarnc~ahon, please
contact the Cucarrang Y
a Residential (gaUday) Peak use (gaUDay)
al/da /ac 4, 2 0 0 peak use (gaUmiNac) 8 x 4 0 0
b Commeraa/Ind (9 Y )
19J fndreate proposed method o1 sewage disposal ^ Septic Tank ~ Sewer
K septic tanks are proposed, attach percdahon tests. M discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate
expelled daily sewage gerierafron (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further dardicabon, Please o0ntact the
' Cucamonga Valley Water Disfid at 987-2591.
a Resrdenbal (yal/day)
b ComrnerpaUlndustrTal (gal/day/ac)
RESlDEN7iAL PROJECTS:
20) Number orresklentialumfs
Detached Indicate range or parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size
AMached (rndiwte whether units are rental or for sale units)
A-11 Rev 3/17/04
11PlANNINGIFINAl1F(~R~S~~~ER4rnbal Shidy Part1 docPage
21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents
Sale Price(s) 3 to $
Rent (per month) $ to
22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type
23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type
24) lndreate the expelled number of schca' children whu wlli tie residing within the prcyer.t. wntaG the appropriate Schoa
Districts as shown rn Attachment 8
•
a Elementary
b Junior High
c Senior Hrgh
COMMERCIAL /NDUSTR/AL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS
25) laescnbe type of use(s) and mapr /unchon(s) of ownmeraal, industrial a msbtutronal uses•
All new proposed building areas are for office use.
26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, a institutional uses by type
49,350 SF of new office area to be added to the existing
19 097 SF of office area for a total of 68,447 SF.
27) /ndicatehoursoloperahon The hours of operation will be typically office
8:00 am to 5:00
28) Number of employees
Total Approximately 75 - 100 employees •
Maximum ShrR 8
Time of Maximum Shift 8 : 0 0 am to 5 : 0 0
A-12
2y~ provide breakdown of ant~crpated fob classtficabons, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication ofthe rate of
hire for each classr(rahon (attach addrt~onal sheet rf necessary)
The lobs created will be
for office use with
and the affiliated administrative positions.
will
ran 25 Thousand to 100 Thousand
salaries.
/ per annual
30) Estrmatan of the number o/ workers to be hired that currently reside in the Gty ~ 5 $ to S 0 $ of total
'31) For corrrnercral and industnal uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air polubon emissions (Data should be
venbed through the South Coast Air Duality Management Drsbrd, at (818) 572.6283).
Air polution emissions will be typically car, truck, and service
vehicles related to office use.
e~~l >ri-ilf,fFTTi
32J P ov de aadequate serv ce to the pro ed profeG?nlf so, plearse ind~catef the response ded fo determine their ability to
Yes
33) In the kiawn Mstory of this property, has them been any use, storage, or discharge d hazardous and/or toxic matenals?
Examples dhazardous and/or toxic matenals include, but are not bmrted to PCB's, radroacbve substan~s^pesbcdebsoand
Irerbrcides, fuels, als, soNeMs, and otherflammable liquids and gases Also rate underground storage
Please Est the matenals and desrnbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property; as wall as the dales of use, d
krawn.
None
`r1
U
I WLANNIN~FlNALV=pR~1COUNTERUruGal Study Part1 docPape 7 of 70
A-13
Rev. 3/'17/04
34) ill the proposed protect rnvoNe the temporary along-term use, storage, ordrscharge o)hazardous and/ortoxic matenals,
including but not limned to those examples hsted above ~ if yes, provide an inventory of all such matenals to be used and
proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown ar~
labeled on the application plans.
No
I hereby certify that the statements /umrshed above and in the attached exhibits present the data and iri)ormaGon required for
adequate evaluation o1 this protect to the best o/my ability, that the facts, statements, and rrdamation presented are hue and correct
tot he best o/ my krwwledge and betel. 1 further understand that additional informatron ma quved to be submitted before an
adequate evaluatOn can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga C r ~ ~/f-C ES
Date:
•
•
A-14
r%: r~~. ~s os
•
nw --~
'',~{{ 4~_
~~ ~_'~
-
III
_s--~Ih~~'1
~ J11 ~• ,4
n
i~--- 4-
)
Y yV _ -•
/
] .
.
at ~'~ 'f
~_ ~y}_ I..~'i"1L ~ }- Y }~r~~S; ~~_r ~~~ ~ d~_ ~ '•T'~M _
J
M1-.. .~ H, ~
T fi
'l
I
.
l
J
~ Q y _ ~~,r
:
I
T ''
~
'
~
.
_ ,,,: ,
;~
,~.~~,_ -_
'~~( 11`
~ ~•
.1 _ 1. _.__
'~~, I ~
Project Site ~~~~" ~~
"
_
~ ~t}
.
311-
- C
_
4
'~
`~
~
,
,
_ 1
^.
1 -
` ~
wW
r
-
' II~L1N
A'-_ I
'
li--_ I
__
=
-~ j _
=, ~-~
J
_ _- rr c t1
~ ,Ci
i
_ T I '
i
'
_- ~_ -jµ '~=-_S_
~_ ..Yi }
I:--lam, --~:' r ~ _ 1 yi
_ ' l
+~--r
• , ~~
~ ~ ~
I
~ r 1r`i
~i
~ ~_7 ~ __I i11~1" =-c'; ~l. ' _
I -__
~
I ~ "-
-
44
~~
°°
-_
__ - __-a'~J..
_ _ c _, i-%^i-
T
'.aL~
~ .ate l __ _ __ I~_i ~~
_ _ _
- Jr~r' ~
_ ~ i
l
- ~ 1 {
A
i ~ t
' ~ ~ '
~
~
I
.~.I-~~
i I
i _
~ A-
~ __I
!Ir
-'
}.
.
1 ~
_
- ~T ~
1 i .~
~~
_ _
_
fa
- 1. ..__ ~ i I r ~ - ~•
LL
- __ - - _Lt_~:f ___ - - - - _ -
- - ~{
__ __ _ _ 'Y.
. - ~. A
a
.
// f - _ O
r
I ~
1
, i ~ ~ ! ~ ' _ } J~~
,_ ~ . ____ _ _ __ ~ I _ t-A
'_ - -- _
[,.r
~
_ _ -
I
..}j
' - _
~ I _ _
_'1' r-_ tl ~ ^~_' - __ _~- I
'J -
}-L ,'q ''
I 1
LD I~•Q~f~l~l~lnWsI~~OI!'I/ID f-1»~l~l ri di Wr~Mil
• ~~
lCOIOOIC.~I
scle laces
plate I
Regional Slte Location
LCe 81 ASSOGBI@S
roam, zoos q_15
t J° Z :abed f'LCT dap iaased YJ'ocFpraasaH aa6 :cofadFs~vaQ
8A1.DE RaOR • L!!OC INC 91L9V
PARCEL MAP NQ rV N~
a „fz
OCl 09ER, 1900 IN THE CITP OF RARCMO CUCAYDRRR •
REIR! A gClplvnRMl 6 TIK souTR Rllf aF toi [L LOI! :! AIO
w
=9, SECT IOY la. TDrllli 1 iDYTM. RAINL T ~[Jf, I
AlE 8 rE
A
wml. A+ PER R/ IawROE! Ir poR art er
U POIQ•IA f
oP Tle eouwTT or aAR eERRARpRO.
w~~~
~f
•u
_ _
wYiri/ e,rr
~
/~'
- "'~'~ wiw !TR[ET
---~
lIIITn
_
•i
y
<iI 7 ~ <
~
39
t
-
INY~w Ir'I tf/
_ ~A
~~
-I/ylAe Dv+el !~'q i b q tger ,u M
l
/AR I/w I
J}E(IfRa.r .vngi w ~~ ZS
I
~ I I ~
W
~ >4 ~ t
~
PARCEL I ~L ; $
2
F PA"E a r
~
.
I ar ,r.! ~ cs
r `
I pp ~~ \ ww , ~••~ h r <
Q
• ' b
I • ~ ~ fD
I /.Mr .~ ,
w
r
I~ < r ~ i ~
P , 3sr
I ~
~
~ ~ R
w
,~.
;
e.~
i t
.r ac..
• S~
a
p ~
3 i o
~ ~
.
an \
i
.
c
~ Oy +
R
t I v \ /„/I . ~w I ? .
1 aRE117lET r111fET a ~ !
aa
F
j
~' Y :s,ti ; 1 ~wr ~
' L
tiz I L
ifl 12 ~
j PARCEL 3
2
i ~oiT 11ia 4
2 ~ f ~ ~
~ t
4 '
^<
~ ! ~l~
e
: ~~ ~ ~
<
1 I
~ ac
.
o
I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .L Z
< .t
~
~
~ uca
A I !
~
.syi ~ ~
t is 2
I ~r /Z a
~,
S I _
!
C rr/iw i ~
~
_ • q
;
I MRRwM a IoVT
~ ` ~A M I y
'
~ ~ A
w
~
% Mw
w r
I ~ I
~
.i
' /,- / .u. PARCEL ~!
~ s' ! ar .d Sf
f
L
I , T -
a !1/RVlTDIb ROTFa
1 < , PARCEL 6 q < e j, ~'19Sr7L'i"~"~='r
'~ ~ '
I i < ..w/.r. i..4wurY.Y..
/Y,..~r
' ~ 't '` ~~ tir
~
'
~
Q.
~ I y ~Y4
N/'-' -
t
~i I 1 {
~ /.AN
w N h
~
I-Y~h~ IWO ~
~ ~ • ~
•r
~~ I
t// • r
Mw ~
~
_ . J i
~ _ r_ rww "~
_'T CII< e[ 11YfJ10 WYYiIr,~- CIT LI~IR
t
. su
~
cIT< O OIITMIO eAh'~ ~T
AN wN
POIRITn
- _ ~ wNw/~
_ __________
--
o _
ar. r rum
-
q Iv~r~
__'T ~~ __________________ .~iOt,r
~ I
M
J I
i
I ~
•
A-16
T H E C I T Y O F
ANC CAMONCA
Mesnorandwn
DATE August 13, 1990
'P0: Applicants
FRONt Dan Coleman, Principal Planner
SUB,I~T; HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCE SITES
Effective July 1, 1987, Government Code Section 65962.5 requires each applicant for
any development protect to consult the State list of Hazardous Waste and Substance
Sttes. Based upon. this list (available from the Planning Division) the applicant is
required to submit a signed statement to the City of Rancho Cucamonga indicating
• whether the protect is located on a,srte which is included on the list before the City
accepts the application as complete. If the protect is listed by the State as a hazardous
waste or substance srte, the applicant must fully descnbe the nature of the hazard and
the po*.ential environmental impacts on the Initial Study, Part 1. Attached is a standard
statement for the applicant to sign.
The State list of Hazardous Waste and Substance Sites may be reviewed at the City of
Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division offices, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
Attachment: Statement Form
DC:dc
U
A-17
HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE STATEMENT
I have been informed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga of my responsibilities pursuant
to California Government Code Section 65962.5 (copy attached) to notify the City as to
whether the site for which a development application has been submitted is located
within an area which has been designated as the location of a hazardous waste site by
the Office of Planning and Research, State of Califomia (OPR).
I have also been informed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga that, as of the date of
executing this Statement OPR has not yet compiled and distributed a list of ha~rdous
waste site as required by said Section 65962.5.
I am informed and believe that the proposed site for which a development application
has been submitted is not within any area specified in said Section 65962.5 as a .
hazardous waste sde
I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Califomia that the foregoing
is true and correct.
Dated: `~ ~" ~ ~ ~
V, ~
r~
L..J
A-18
CIP
.~
Mr Douglas Fenn
Associate Planner
The Crty of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Dnve
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807
September 26, 2005
19762 MacArthtu Blvd ,State 300
Irnne, CA 92612-2498
tel 949 474 7030
fax 949 414 2101
www oprealestate.com
Re• Development Review DRC2005-00585 and Tentative Pazcel Man SUBTPM17423
Deaz Mr. Fenn.
This letter will respond to Comment No 5 of Paragraph II,A of the Incompleteness Comments
returned to the Applicant under cover of the City's letter dated August 10, 2005.
Comment No. 5 states that a biological survey of the site is required because the property is
located m an azea identified as a potential habitat for the endangered Delhi Sands flower-loving
fly ("Della Sands fly")
• I understand that you have had a conversation with the Applicant's agent, Ms Carol Plowman of
Lee & Associates, with respect to this matter Confirming your conversation with Ms. Plowman,
I am enclosing the followmg•
• A copy of the Habitat Suitability Evaluation fora +25-acre site in the City dated
Mazch 24, 2004, and performed by Ecological Sciences, Inc.
• A copy of the San Bemazdino County Histonc and Current Habitat Distribution of
the Dellli Sands fly.
A copy of Parcel Map 9498
The subject application has been made by the Applicant with respect to Parcels 1 & 2 of Parcel
Map 9498. Confirming your conversation with Ms Plowman, it is the Applicant's
understanding that Pazcels 1 & 2 of Parcel Map 9498 are not located in an area identified as a
potential habitat for the Della Sands fly
The enclosed study was performed by the owner of Parcels 3, 4 & 5 of Parcel Map 9498,
because, we understand, a pomon of that property may be within the potential habitat shown on
the enclosed potential habitat map
A-19
F \wp\Gateway Dev\Frnn 092605 commrnt 5 doc
Mr. Douglas Fenn
September 26, 2005
Page 2 of 2
Pazcels 1 & 2 of Pazcel Map 9498, which are the subject of this application, aze graded and •
developed although there remains the potential for addthonal butldmgs wrthm the City's
coverage requirements which addrttonal butldmgs are the subject of ttus apphcatton. (I invite
your attention to page 8 of the enclosed habitat study which confirms that the study area is
surrounded by existing development to the North, East and West In fact, the existing "
development to the North constitutes Pazcels 1 & 2 of Pazcel Map 9498, which is the subject of
this apphcatton.)
Please call me if you have any further questions or comments.
Very truly yours,
Chazles A McKenna, Jr.
CAM/jg
Enclosure
r1
LJ
•
F \wp\Gateway Dev\Frnn 092605 comment 5 doc Q-20
~ ~,~>~
~''~` '
ECOLOGICAL
SCI EN CESm<
2840 S. HARBOR BLVD., SUITE C-5 • CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, OXNARD, CA 98085
TEL 805.985. 1944 • FAX 805.985. 1945 • EMAIL: SCAMERON~ECOSCIENCESINC.COM
March 24, 2004
Ms. Carol Plowman
Lee 8 Associates
3535 Inland Empire Boulevard
Ontano, CA 91764
SUBJECT: Results of a Habitat Suitability Evaluation, t25-acre Site, Clty of Rancho
Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California
Dear Carol•
This letter report presents findings of a reconnaissance-level survey conducted to generally evaluate the
suitability of a t25-acre study area to support the federally-listed endangered Delhi Sands Flower-loving fly
(Rhaphromrdas termmatus abdommal~s-herein DSF)
/ntroduction
The subted t25-aura site consists of three parcels consisting of 10 27 acres, 8 56 acres, and 6 82 acres,
respectively The site is regionally located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (Plate 1) Specifically, the
site is located north of 4"' Street, south of 6i" SVeet, east of Haven Avenue, and west of Utica Avenue
(P/ate 2) Protects proposed in the area that contain potentially suitable habitat to support sensdive
biological resources such as the DSF must demonsrate to reviewing agencies that potential protect-
related impacts to sensitive biological resources are avoided or minimized In order to meet the
environmental documentation and review requirements, potentially occumng sensible biological
resources must be addressed to demonstrate the applicant's conformance to California Environmental
Quality Act (CEGA) and the federal Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended As such, this
report is intended to provide biological information to the applicant In support of the environmental review
process
As a federally listed endangered species, the DSF is protected under the Act As such, federal law
prohibits "take" of listed species The term "take" means to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill,
trap, capture or tolled, or attempt to engage in any such conduct In some cases, habitat modification
can constitute prohibitive "take" A section 10(a) permit is required for protects where a determination of
"take" Is likely to occur dunng a proposed non-federal activity If the protect were to require a federel
permit (e g , USACOE 404 permit), the federal agency Issuing the permit would consult with the Service
to determine how the action may affect the DSF under Section 7 of the Ad
The Sernce routinely reviews environmental documentation for proposed development protects In the
area, and as such, would recommend that any impacts to sensitive biological resources Ue adequately
addressed and mitigated pursuant to the Ad and CEQA Due to the inherent limitations of unseasonal ar
habitat-based data, definitive conclusions regarding the actual presence or absence of DSF cannot be
made in this evaluation Accordingly, this report is intended to provide the applicant with general
. information relative to the occurrence potential of DSF based solely on the nature of habitat present
A-21
Selected Species Overview •
The Service listed the DSF as an endangered speaes on September 23, 1993 This speaes is only
known to occur in assoaation with Delhi sand deposils (USFWS 1997), primarily on twelve disjunct sties
vnthin a radius of about eight miles in the sties of Colton, Rialto, and Fontana in southwestern San
Bernardino and northwestern Riverside counties However, recent survey data (1997-03) indicates that
DSF occur in low numbers in Ontario, and also insub-optimal habitat conditions The DSF is restricted to
the Collon Dunes, which covers approximately 40 square miles More than 95 percent of the formerly
known habitat has been converted to human uses or severely affected by human activities, rendering d
apparently unsuitable for occupation by the speaes (Smith 1993, USFWS 1997 in Kingsley 1996)
General Habitat Characteristics
Areas centaimng sandy substrates with a sparse cover of perennial shrubs and other vegetation
constitute the primary habitat requirements for Rhaphtomidas flies (USFWS 1997) Polenbal habitat for
the DSF is typically defined as areas wmpnsed of sandy sod (Delhi sedes) in open areas commonly
dominated by three indicator plant speaes California buckwheat (Enogonum fasaculatum), California
Croton (Croton calrfomica), and telegraph weed (Heterotheca grandrNora) Annual bursage (Ambrosia
acanthtcarpa), fiddleneck (AmsincMa menztese), autumn vinegar weed (Lessingta glandulifera), sapphire
enastrum (Enastrum sapphinnum), primrose (Oenothera sp ), and Thurber's buckwheat (Enogonum
thurben) are also commonly present at occupied DSF sites In addition, insect indicator speaes such as
Apiocera and Nemomydas are also typically assoaated with occupied DSF habdat It is also important to
note that the presence or absence of indicator speaes does not detertmne presence/absence of DSF.
Rather, these indicator speaes exhibit a strong correlation to habdats oa;upied by DSF A gradient of
habitat swtabil~ty ewsts for DSF, composed of varying degrees of troth natural and arttfiaal conditions
DSF Recovery Unlts/Proposed Core Reserves
Subregional areas encompassing smaller areas known to be inhabited by the DSF or encompassing
areas that contain restorable habitat for the DSF have been grouped into three Recovery Umts (RUs) by
the Service based on geographic proximdy, similarily of habitat, and potenttal genetic exchange (USFWS •
1997) The sublecl site is located within an area designated as the Ontario RU The Ontario RU
histoncelly contained the largest block of the Cotton Dunes, however, most lands m this RU have been
converted to agriculture, or developed for commeroial and residential projects (USFWS 1997) The
Ontario RU contains several areas that currently support DSF, and additional areas have been proposed
for restoration m the DSF Recovery Plan DSF Nell continue to exist in the Ontario RU only wdh land
conservation, a cessation of current habitat-degrading land management practices and recreational uses,
and/or a restoration or natural reversion of ecologically damaged lands back to an ecological commurnty
typical of Delhi sands formations
Additional data will be needed on reproduction and mortality rates, dispersal, and habitat variables before
further refinement of RU boundaries, development of alternative RU preserve designs, and analyses of
population can be made (USFWS 1997) Until such data is obtained, the highest priority will be to protect
existing populations of the DSF (USFWS 1997) To achieve downlisting, areas containing occupied
and/or restorable habitat and dispersal comdors need to be evaluated relative to the extent of distribution
patterns necessary to support secure populations Sites to be protected should be selected based on
habitat needs of adults and larvae, and willingness of landowners to partiapate in recovery efforts
(USFWS 1997) Several "Core Reserve Areas" have been initially identified by the Service, but to our
knowledge, the actual extent of the proposed reserve areas have not been finalized Occupied and/or
potenfially restorable habitat m the RUs includes only those areas that, at a mirnmum, contain Delhi
Series sods Further, RUs do not inGude residential and cemmeroial development, or areas that have
been otherwise permanently altered by human actions (USFWS 1997)
Development in the region has been cumulatively reduang the amount of open areas Such conversions
have been and will continue to lead to the permanent loss of the amount of land available for DSF When
viewed individually, it may be possible for each protect to mitigate potential project-speafic impacts
through the implementation of habitat replacement programs and the requirements of the regulatory
~7 •
• °"`° Lee 8 Associates
Marta 24, 2004
A-24 Pege 4
. processes to which each protect may be subiect (e g , CEQA) Cumulative impacts are expected to be
addressed through partiapation and implementation of the Valley Wide Multiple Spedes Habitat
Conservation Plan (as initially outlined in the 1995 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the
Service, other resource agenaes, and local iunsdictions) Additionally, regional and/or subregional DSF
habitat conservation plans currently proposed for the region would also be expected to address this issue
We understand that Rancho Cucamonga (City) is currently negotiating wdh the Service to develop a
mutually acceptable process for implementing portions of the DSF Recovery Plan developed by the
Service We further understand that it is the intent of the City to continue to accommodate essential DSF
habitat in their long-range development plans
Focused DSF Survey Guidelines
The Service prepared Presence/Absence Survey Gudelines for the DSF in December 1996 (USFWS
1996) In general, the guidelines maintain that in order to more fully determine the presence or absence
of DSF such that the results are acceptable to the Service, a survey follovnng these guidelines must be
conducted. The guidelines require that surveys be conducted in all areas containing Delhi sands twice
weekly (two days per week) dunng the single annual flight penod from July 15 to September 20.
However, at the discretion of the Service, survey guidelines may be modified depending upon individual
site circumstances (e g ,highly degraded sites that don't support constituent elements of potential DSF
habitat or early seasonal emergence penods)
Methodology
Literature Search
Documentation pertinent to the biological resources in the vianity of the site was reviewed and analyzed
Information reviewed included (1) the Federal Register listing package for the federally listed endangered
DSF; (2) literature pertaining to habitat requirements of DSF, (3) the California Natural DiversRy Data
Base (CNDDB 2003) information regarding sensitive species potentially oa;umng on the protect site in a
• computer report format for the "Guasti" USGS 7 5-minute quadrangle map, and (4) review of available
reports from the general viandy of the protect site.
2004 HabitatSuitability Evaluation
r1
~J
Ecological Saences, Inc biologists conducted areconnaissance-level field survey on the subject site to
evaluate potential habitat for DSF on February 10, 2004 Ecological Sciences, Inc biologists have
observed numerous DSF in the field since 1995, and have extensive expenence conducting both focused
surveys and habitat evaluations for this sensitive taxon Ecological Saences is well versed month the biotic
charactenstics of a range of habitats occupied by DSF, as well as other sensitive wildlrfe speaes
potentially occumng in the area The site was examined on foot by walking a senes of meandenng
transects across the subfect property As mentioned, the pnmary ob/edive of the one-day field visit was
to generally evaluate the site's potential to support DSF Dominant plant speaes and other habitat
charactenstics present at the site were identified to assess the overall habitat value
Existing Site Conditions
The site is charactenzed as an abandoned vineyard dominated by invasive plant speaes. Vanous types
of debns (concrete, asphalt, gravel, manure, lawn dippings) have been dumped in portions of the ske
Landsceped business park signage is also present on property comers The site has been disked
between the existing vine rows, and a dense interstitial thatch of non-native vegetation appears to have
been present poor to disking No native vegetation communities are present A regularly maintained
drainage ditch is loceted in the southwestern portion of the site Vegetative coverege was approximately
40 percent Plates 3a-3b photographicelly illusVate existing site conditions
~?
Lee 8 Assoaates
March 24, 2004
Page 5
A-25
Vegetation •
Ruderal vegetation dominates the subled site Invasive plant speaes recorded dunng the survey effort
included cultivated grape (Vitus wndera), filaree (Erodium acutanum), brome grasses (Bromus spp.),
Mediterranean grass (Schismus barbatus), pigweed (Amaranthus album), London rocket (Systmbnum
mo), Russian thistle (Salsola tragus), mustard (Brassica and/or Hirschfeld~a spp.), Vee of heaven
(Ailanthus altisstma), and a few scattered tamansk (Tamanx sp) in the drainage area Landscaping
species present on site mcluded gum tree (Eucalyptus sp ), pine (Pious sp ), olive (Olea europea), and
sweetgum (Lrquidambarstyraat]ua).
Native plant species present on site included fiddleneck, western ragweed (Ambrosia psilostachya), and
bur-sage In addition, telegraph weed and a single mule fat (Bacchans sal~cdolia) shrub were present in
the dremage area Several of these native plant species are often considered potential 'indicators' of
suitable DSF habitat although indicator plant speaes also occur on highly disturbed/degraded properties
that do not support potential DSF habitat Moreover, the context in which these native plant speaes occur
(e g ,overgrown and highly disturbed situations within a dense coverage of non-native grasses and (orbs)
does not constitute a substantive native Delhi plant community
Wildlife
Reptile speaes observed included western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentals) Bird speaes observed
dunng the survey effort mcluded Amenca aow (Corvus brachyrhynchos), rock dove (Columba Itvia),
western meadowlark (Stumel/a neglects), and house sparrow (Passer domesticus) Mammal species
directly observed, or of which sign was detected, incuded California ground sgwrrel (Spennophdus
beecheyi)
Soils Analysis /Soil Conservation Map Revlew
A review of sod maps prepared for the area by the U.S Department of Agnculture (1980) indicate that the •
subled site is located within an area mapped as Delhi fine sand (Db), Hanford coarse sandy loam (HaC),
and Hanford sandy loam (HbA) HaC and HbA sod types are not ordinanly assocated wnfh potential DSF
habitat Substrate composition was generally fnable, with a few areas containing gravel and cobbles.
Plate 4 dlusVates protect area sods.
Surrounding Land Use
The subled sde is located in a commeraal area of the City The study area is surrounded by existing
development to the north, east and west To the south (south of 4"' Street) is vacant land associated with
the old Ontano Motor Speedway site
Discussion
DSF have relatively narrow habitat requirements that are determined by appropnate plant species and
open sand as defining charactenstics (Kingsley 1996) The presence of Delhi sods appears to be the
most detenninative factor of whether an area can provide swtable DSF habitat Delhi sands constitute the
pnmary component of a complex ecosystem A vanety of microhabitat charectensUcs generelty constitute
potential DSF habdat (e g , Delhi sods, vegetation composition, soil chemistry, topography, percent
vegetative cover, frequency of non-native plant speaes, exposure to disturbances, etc.) However, rt is
widely acknowledged that a gradient of habitat swtabdity exists for DSF, composed of varying degrees of
natural and arGfiaal conditions Comprehensive DSF population data is generally lacking and key factors
regulating DSF populations have not been fully identified As such, whether this taxon would persist over
a long-tens basis m less than ideal conddions is currently unknown
While the aforementioned habitat conditions are considered optimaVessenGal to support DSF, DSF
sometimes occur in areas not typically considered suitable for this taxon. Although indmdual DSF have
~~
Lee 6 Associates
March 24, 2004
Page a
A-28
been recorded from sites supporting mostly ruderal, non-native vegetation, most known DSF-occupied •
sites contain areas, or are adtacent to areas, of relatively undisturbed exposed patches of viable, sandy
sods m association with native plant speces In addition, history of DSF colony sites indicates that
previously disturbed (by grading, agriculture, etc) Delhi sands fonnations may revert over a few years
(through erosion, aeolian processes, fossonal animal activity, and natural vegetative succession) back to
condR~ons capable of supporting DSF populations However, these natural processes are dependent
upon a cessation of disturbance-related land uses.
The srte is also not located adtacent to an area known to support DSF or potential DSF habitat In
addition, there is no apparent connectivity to the subfect site from the nearest known extant DSF
population (generally t3 0 miles to the south) due to existing development that has long since fragmented
potential DSF habitat m the area Whde variables such as the length, width, and structural charactenst~cs
of dispersal comdors have not been fully identified, this species likely has the cepabdRy of dispersing over
relatively large distances of seemingly unsuitable habitats under certain Grcumstances. Nonetheless, R
would be reasonable to assume based on the highly fragmented nature of habitats in the site viGnity and
our current knowledge of the species that the likelihood of DSF dispersing to the study area from any
known occupied sties would be considered low Moreover, the subject site would not likely be considered
an essential or regionally important property for preservation/restoration due to its geographic location,
surrounding commeraal land uses, and overall absence of suRable habitat on or adjacent to the sRe.
Despite the fact that existing site conditions do not appear to be particulady supportive of DSF as
described, in order to make more defirntive conclusions relative to DSF presence/absence, the Sernce
routinely requests that focused DSF surveys be conducted following federal protocol depending upon
individual site condtions During the environmental review process, recommendations to pertortn focused
DSF surveys are evaluated by reweHnng agenaes on a sRe-by-sde basis.
Conclusion
Based on results of the February 2004 habRat suitability evaluation, the sub/ect t25-acre sRe does not •
likely contain habitat considered sutable to support or sustain an extant DSF population No native plant
commurnties or open, sandy areas more commonly assoaated with potential DSF habitat are present in
the study area Long-standing surface disturbances can have substantial negative impacts on potential
DSF habitat by preventing potentially suitable DSF microhabRat soil condR~ons from developing
Disruption of soil integrity provides opportunities for invasive vegetation to dominate, mhibds the growth of
native Delhi communities, and results m a higher potential for alteration of sort chemistry in ways
detrimental to DSF Absent preventing recumng anthropogenic site disturbances and restoration of
ecologically damaged habitat back to a more characteristic Delhi sand community, the establishment of a
viable DSF population on the sub/ed sRe would likely be preGuded Accordingly, the occurrence potential
for DSF on the sub/ect site would generally be considered low
It has been a pleasure conducting this habitat sutability evaluation at the t25-acre pro/ect sRe logted m
Rancho Cucamonga If you have any questions regarding results presented m this report, please don't
hesitate to call
Sincerely,
Ecological Sciences, Inc
C~
ScottD Cameron
Principal Biologist
7
Lea 8 Assodefes
Marts 24, 2004
Page f0
C~
A-30
• References
California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) 2003 Computer Reports for the "GuasU' USGS 7 5-
minute quadrangle map
r1
L__J
•
Kingsley, Kenneth J 1996 Behavior of the Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly (Diptere Mydidae), a Little
Known Endangered Speaes Ann Entomol. Soc. Am. 89(6) 883-891.
Soil ConservaUOn Servce. 1980. Soil Survey of San Bernardino County, Southwestern Part, California
U S. Department of Agncufture.
U S Fish and Wildlife Service 1993 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants Detemm~aUon of
Endangered Status for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly U S. Department of Interior Federal Register,
58 (183) 498819887.
U S Fish and Wildlife Service 1996 Intenm General Survey Gwdelines for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving
Fly December 30
U S Fish and Wildlife Service 1997 Delhi sands Flower-loving Fly (Rhaphfomldas terminatus
abdominal~s) Recovery Plan. U S Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, OR 51 pp
7
Lee 8 AssoGates
Match 24, 2004
Page 1 f
A-31
.:
.~
,,,~
.:
~• • ~ • 7~
--- ~~~ ...mot' _ -
I~ __ I f _ .. ._ '--- -
~. - _
1 _ - - -. .. h - -
__ ~t~ ~ i •r_ °WlII -r s_ ~ _ _
h 11
1 ~ 1~-
n -
w - ~ ~_ __ -
r ~
~~~~_. '. ~ ~~ Faso
_ - ~ __
- - '~ `'~
B ~ - _ _ - - RANCH!
ONTaR[o- - ~ _ _ __ ____ _ _ __ ____ _
F O N
r ~ r r +,d -~
~II •
~ !i l ~
{ I • I •
. &.~ {~ ~ ~;,~ O-~f 1310 MOT~~; ~ ~ DW~CY
i ~~ ~ • ~ u •
~r F
- -1--- - - _- - ---~-- > _ - -
1 -_ ---- ---__,___ __ _- -
~ - ____- -_- ~-J
- - __ ~ -1r- ~ LAhL
sur~.aaor,.,rr rnwo~ • V(4M a....ti, cam ~~•.n gr ~ ~1A pe.~ w on. orve
!t4 OGICAL
ae~eraeee
March 2004
p/ate 2 •
Site V/c/nlly
Lee & AssoGates
A-32
Vew to north
•
view to south
• ,®~
GGOLOGICAI
3 CILN CCS
March 2004
plate 3 b
Site Photographs
Lee & AssoGates
A-33
View to east
i~
View to west
'~.~
eco~ocrcn.t
R CIGNCCS
March 2064
A-34
plate 3Q •
Site Photographs
Lee & Assoaates
r~
U
~~~~
e cc+avcrc .~l.
6C1l MCt8
March 2004
plate 4
Project Area Soils
Lee & Assoaates
A-35
D
w
J
a
n
~ A ~ $ ~ y i
~~
~~~
~~- ~y
.~
a
~~E
~~R
~~
g~i
,.
~~
r
~ i~
E
~d
n
T
A
d~~
:;~
~~~
~~
~ ~ ~~
~ ~l!~yy
F`
~~ ~ ~ t~ ~ ~j~ ~p
;~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~}t~~ is
~~~M ~ ~ ~~ t~t ,~ ~ ~M p
:'~ r
f ~ 1~t{y FMs ~ ~ T ,
t~f ~ ~ E~t~ ~ ~~ `~
,~ ~ a ~~ ~ ~
~~~ ,~~ R
~ ~ ~ ~~ ~
m-
nT
i
J
N
e
x
s
O
•
~ yM M
A ~~tl~ Y
n ~g~'
pp t
1
5~~~
x~~R;
r~
=~~~i
C ~~
~~q~~~
€A~R ~
y
~~~~ Q
"~ ~ tc
R $ Q 1~
! $~ 6 a
i
s
h
:~
a
:~
M
'.4
;~~
a
N
BACKGROUND
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II
1. Project File: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17423
2. Related Files. Development Review DRC2005-00585
3. Description of Prolect ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
SUBTPM17423 -CIP REAL ESTATE - A request to subdivide 3 37 net acres of land into a single
parcel for 26 condominium units in the Haven Avenue Overlay District (Subarea 6), located at the
northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Trademark Parkway - APN 0210-081-017 Related Fdes
DRC2005-00585 This protect is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA gwdelines Section 15301
4. Protect Sponsor's Name and Address:
Mr Chuck Mc Kenna
CIP Real Estate
19762 Mac Arthur Boulevard, Suite 300
Irvine, CA 92612
• 5. General Plan Designation. Industrial Park
6. Zoning: Industrial Park Avenue Overlay District (Subarea 6)
7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The undeveloped portion of the site presently drains from
the north to the south With the exception of the existing street trees along Haven Avenue, there
are no other existing trees on the undeveloped portion of the site There are no mature trees on
the vacant portion of the subtect site
8. Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Dnnsion
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
9. Contact Person and Phone Number:
Douglas Fenn, Associate Planner
(909) 477-2750
10 Other agenaes whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or
participation agreement): None
•
A-37
Initial Study for
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17423
GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report:
CVWD -Cucamonga Valley Water District
EIR -Environmental Impact Report
FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report
NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NOx -Nitrogen Oxides
ROG -Reactive Organic Gases
PM~a -Fine Particulate Matter
RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board
SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District
SWPPP -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 2
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least
one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigaton
Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages
() Aesthetics Q Agricultural Resources Q Air Quality
()Biological Resources Q Cultural Resources ()Geology & Soils
Q Hazards & Waste Materials ()Hydrology & Water Quality ()Land Use 8 Planning
()Mineral Resources () Noise ()Population 8 Housing
()Public Services ()Recreation () Transportation/Traffic
O Utilities & Service S stems Mandato Fmdin s of Si nificance
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation
(X) I find that the proposed protect COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared
() I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there
will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the protect have been made by, or
agreed to, by the protect proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared
() I find that the proposed protect MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is requved
() I find that the proposed protect MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant
unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately
analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed
by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain
to be addressed
() I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment,
because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or
NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated
pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures
that are imposed upon the proposed protect, nothing further is required
•
LJ
A-38
•
•
Initial Study for
nn nn Cl aaAD CI IDTDI1A17d91
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 3
1 tIVIAIIVC rr+nv~~rvira vva+,
Leaa 7nml
Siprufiwni Lsn
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polan4ally
Slgrvfiranl Wiih
MNpaaon Tlwn
SipnfiuM
No
Im atl Inm tad Im tl Im ad
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1. AESTHETICS. Would the project () () () (/)
a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vista
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, mcludmg, (') O U (/)
but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and
historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway
c) Substantially degrade the existing casual character () () () (/)
or quality of the site and its surroundings
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () 0 (/)
which would adversely affect day or nighttime
views in the area
Comments•
a-d) The applicant proposes 26 condominiums of 9 professional office building (mcludmg 2
existing buildings) This condo map is not within a view corridor or affects a scenic vista, will
not damage scenic resources or state historic buildings, nor degrade the existing visual
character of the surrounding properties, or create light and glare There no environmental
impacts of the proposed condominium map
2 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project () () () (/)
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural
uses
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or () () () (/)
a Williamson Act contract?
c) Involve other changes In the existing environment, O O U (/)
which, due to their location or nature, could result in
conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses
Comments:
a-c) The applicant proposes 26 condominiums of 9 professional office buildings (including 2
existing buildings) This condo map well not convert prime farmland, nor conflict with existing
zoning of agricultural use, nor change the existing environment that would result in the
conversion of Farmland There no environmental impacts of the proposed condominium map
J
A-39
Initial Study for
TC,ITAT1\/C on o!`CI ~AGP CI IRTPI\A17d93
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Pape 4
l uvlr\Ilv~ ~ n,\...~~..
Lass men
SiBnfiranl Lass
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polanfielly
S~pnfic,nl w~~n
NL,B,OOn m,n
Sipnfimnl
No
Im aq Into !eE I aq Im ap
3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project () () () (~)
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () () () (~)
substantially to an existing or protected air quality
violation
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase () () () (~)
of any criteria pollutant for which the protect region
is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or
State ambient air quality standard (including
releasing emissions that exceed quantitative
thresholds for ozone precursors?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () () () (~)
concentrations
e) Create oblectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (~)
number of people
Comments:
,, 1f
u
a-e) The applicant proposes 26 condominiums of 9 professional office buildings (including 2 .
existing buildings) This condo map will not conflict with or obstruct with implementation of air
quality air plan, will not increase air pollutants or release emission that exceed quantitative
threshold, nor create oblectionable odors There no environmental impacts of the proposed
condominium map
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the protect () () () (~)
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special
status species in local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian () () () (~)
habitat or other sensitive natural community
identified in local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (~)
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to,
marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct
removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other
means
•
q-40
•
Initial Study for
PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17423
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Pa e 5
TENTATIVE
L°~ m~
Sipnifie°nt Lau
Issues and Supporting Information Sources r°'°""°"Y
Sipnlfirant
Im °ct Nfi'"
MiUg°tlon
Inm w°teE m°"
Sipnfinnl
Im ap
N°
I °d
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any () () () (~)
native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species
or with established native resident or migratory
wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native
wildlife nursery sites
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances O O O (~)
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (~)
Conservation Plan, Natural Community
conservation Plan, or other approved local,
regional, or State habitat conservation plan
Comments:
a-f) The proposed 26 condominiums of 9 professional office buildings (including 2 existing
buildings) will not have a negative environmental impact on all of the above referenced
biological resources because the protect is a division of air space
•
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project () () () (~)
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource as defined in
§ 15064 5~
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (~)
significance of an archeological resource pursuant
to § 15064 5~
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique O O O (~)
paleontological resource or site or unique geologic
feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those () () () (~)
interred outside of formal cemeteries?
Comments•
a-d) No cultural resources will be adversely effected because the condominium map is a division
of air space There no environmental impacts of the proposed condominium map
r1
L_J
A-41
Initial Study for
TCAITATI\/C DAR(~FI MAP CI IRTPM174~3
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 6
Leaa Than
SlBnlfipnt Lesa
Issues and Supporting Information Sources P°'anaally
SiBnifiwnl wtn
MNpab°n Than
$IBNfiwnt
N°
Im act Inm oretetl Im aC I act
6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the proect
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, intury, or
death Involving
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (~)
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map Issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known fault?
Refer to Division of Mmes and Geology
S ecial Publication 42
n Stron seismic round shaken ~ ~
nQ Seismic-related ground failure, including O O O (/)
II uefaction~
iv Landslides ~
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of () () () (~)
topsoll9
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is () () () (~)
unstable, or that would become unstable as a result
of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (~)
18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994),
creating substantial risks to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the () () () (~)
use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater
disposal systems where sewers are not available
for the disposal of wastewater
Comments:
a-e) No physical impacts will occur to the existing geology of the area or soils, because the
condominium map Is a division of air space There no environmental Impacts of the proposed
condominium map
7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the () () () (~)
protect
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (~)
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?
•
. •
r 1
U
A-42
•
I• J
Initial Study for
raTrvr nnt~!`CI t\AAD CI IRTD~A17d9'2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 7
I CIV I n 1 1 V C rnrw~~ rvr~,
Lem Than
Significant leas
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Patanually
Significant
Im act wtn
MlhpaOOn
Into rated Than
Significant
Im ap
No
Im as
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (~)
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which Is included on a hst of O O O (~)
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a
result, would it create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment
e) For a prolect located within an airport land use plan () () () (~)
or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within
2 miles of a public airport or public use airport,
would the prolect result in a safety hazard for
people residing or working in the prolect area
f) For a prolect wdhm the vicinity of a pnvate airstnp, O O U (~)
would the prolect result in a safety hazard for
people residing or working in the prolect area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with O O O (~)
an adopted emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (~)
toss, injury or death involving wiidland fires,
including where wildlands are adjacent to
urbanized areas or where residences are
intermixed with wildlands?
Comments•
a-h) No people (neighborhoods), school children, will be adversely exposed to nor will hazardous
material be Imported to the site that would negatively effect the site of surrounding area,
because the condominium map is a division of air space There no environmental impacts of
the proposed condominium map
•
8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the () () () (~)
prolect
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or () () () (~)
intertere substantially with groundwater recharge
such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer
volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table
level (e g , the production rate of pre-existing
nearby wells would drop to a level which would not
support existing land uses or planned uses for
which permits have been granted)
A-43
Initial Study for
MAP SUBTPM17423
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Pa e 8
TENTATIVE PARCEL
Less man
Sipnificent Lew
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources
pp g v°`°n"a'lY
Sipnificent "~'"
Mihpehon ~"°°
Signficant
No
Im ea Inw latl Im as Im d
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of () () () (/)
the site or area, Including through the alteration of
the course of a stream or nver, in a manner, which
would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or
off-site
d) Substantially alter the existing dralnage pattern of () () () (/)
the site or area, including through the alteration of
the course of a stream or river, or substantially
Increase the rate or amount of surface runoff In a
manner, which would result In Flooding on- or off-
site7
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would () () () (/)
exceed the capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial
additional sources of polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () () () (/)
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area () () () (/)
as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or
Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard
delineation maps
h) Place within a 100-year Flood hazard area () () () (/)
structures that would impede or redirect flood
flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/)
loss, injury or death involving Flooding, including
flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp
I) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (/)
Comments
a-I) The proposed prolect will not violate air quality and waste water standards, alter existing,
drainage system or create additional capacity to existing drainage system Additionally no
persons will be exposed to flood hazard area or place housing in a flood hazard area,
because the condominium map is a division of air space There no environmental Impacts of
the proposed condominium map
9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the prolect
a) Physically divide an established community () () () (/)
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/)
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the
prolect (including, but not limited to, a general plan,
specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning
ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect
c) Conflict wdh any applicable habitat conservation O O U (/)
plan or natural community conservation plan?
•
•
•
A-44
•
Initial Study for
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Paae 9
TENTH I IVt YHKI.CL NI/1r' JL/~ I rm i t ~~.+
LB66 Then
Significant Lew
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potanaelly
Signifiwnt WN
MNga4on 7han
SigniRant
No
Im ad Inm eteE Im ed I ad
Comments:
a-c) No established community will be physically divided, nor will any change to land use or
program, or conflict with community conversation plans, because the condominium map is a
division of air space There no environmental impacts of the proposed condominium map
10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the prolect () () () (/)
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of value to the region and
the residents of the State?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally () () () (/)
important mineral resource recovery site delineated
on a Iocai general plan, specific plan or other land
use plan
Comments:
a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City
General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact
•
•
b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable
mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact
11. NOISE. Would the prolect result rn
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise
levels in excess of standards established in the
local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable
standards of other agencies? () () () (/)
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/)
ground borne vibration or ground borne noise
levels
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (/)
levels in the prolect vicinity above levels existing
without the prolect?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in O 0 O (/)
ambient noise levels in the prolect vicinity above
levels existing without the prolect?
e) For a prolect located within an airport land use plan O U O (/)
or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within
2 miles of a public airport or public use airport,
would the prolect expose people residing or
working in the prolect area to excessive noise
levels
f) For a prolect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, O O O (/)
would the prolect expose people residing or
working in the prolect area to excessive noise
levels
A-45
Initial Study for
E PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17423
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Pa a 10
TENTATIV
L••• Than
SIBn~fic•nl Lass
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources
PP g Pctenu.lly
Sipnfficam
Im eq vim,
MNp•bon
Inw oret•0 Th.n
Siprvfic•nl
Im •d
No
I •d
Comments:
a-f) The proposed condominium map will not create any noise, exposure of noise, or is within the
vicinity of an airstrip that would create or place persons to adverse noise levels
12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project () () () (~)
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area,
either directly (for example, by proposing new
homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example,
through extension of roads or other infrastructure)
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (~)
necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, O O O (~)
necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere
Comments•
A-c No displacement of housing, substantial population growth will accrue with the proposed
condominium map of professional office buildings There no environmental impacts of the
proposed condominium map
13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result rn
substantial adverse physical rmpacts associated with the
provision of new or physrcally altered govemmental
facilities, need for new or physrcally altered govemmental
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental rmpacts, in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response trines or other performance
ob/echoes for any of the public services
a) Frre protections O O O (~)
b) Police protections O O O (~)
c) Schools () () () (~)
d) Parks () () () (~)
e) Other public facihhes~ O O O (~)
•
•
•
A-46
Initial Study for
r. l.rl r.fino CI IOTDAA17A 7Z
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 11
I tIVIHI1VC r/~{r[\/GL IVIr\I a,vs+~
Less Then
Siprvficenl Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources
PP g Polenuelly
Sipraficenl WUI
MNpabon Then
Siprvficent
No
Im ea Inw reteE Im ea Im ed
Comments:
a-e) No additional public services for fire, police, schools, parks and similar like facilities will be
adversely Impacted by the proposed condominium map There no environmental impacts of
the proposed condominium map
14. RECREATION. Would the project () () () (/)
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and
regional parks or other recreational facilities such
that substantial physical deterioration of the facility
would occur or be accelerated?
b) Does the protect include recreational facilities or () () () (/)
require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities, which might have an adverse
physical effect on the environment
Comments:
. a-b) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga No
addltlonal recreational services or adverse Impacts to existing recreational facilities by the
proposed professional office condominium map There no environmental Impacts of the
proposed condominium map
•
15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC Would the pro/ect () () () (/)
a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of
the street system (i e , result in a substantial
increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the
volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at
intersections)?
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level O O O (/)
of service standard established by the county
congestion management agency for designated
roads or highways
c) Result in a change In air traffic patterns, including () () () (/)
ether an increase in traffic levels or a change in
location that results in substantial safety risks
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design O O O (/)
feature (e g , sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible uses (e g , farm
equipment)
e) Result m inadequate emergency access O O O (/)
f) Result m inadequate parking capacity? O O O (/)
A-47
Initial Study for
rr ur nT Vl- on o/"CI ~AAD CI IRTP~A'17d73
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 12
I C I V I M I I V G r rv w~ ~~
Leas 7hm
SigMlcanl Lau
Issues and Supporting Information Sources P°'an°°by
Spmbwnt
Im as wan
MNpabon
Into IeE m.n
Siprvlinnt
I ad
No
Im bd
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (~)
supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus
turnouts, bicycle racks)
Comments:
a-g) The proposed prolect will create additional traffic or adversely affect existing traffic counts, or
plans, or create inadequate emergency access or inadequate parking capacity The
condominium map is a division of air space There no environmental impacts of the proposed
condominium map
16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the () () () (~)
prolect
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water () () () (~)
or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the construction of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (~)
water drainage facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects ~
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve () () () (~)
the prolect from existing entitlements and
resources, or are new or expanded entitlements
needed?
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater () () () (~)
treatment provider, which serves or may serve the
prolect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the
project's protected demand in addition to the
provider's existing commitments
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (~)
capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste
disposal needs
g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (~)
regulations related to solid waste?
Comments•
a-g) The proposed prolect will not increase the demand of any of the any of the above referenced
utilities The condominium map is a division of air space and not located in such hazardous
areas There no environmental impacts of the proposed condominium map
n
U
A-48
Initial Study for
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17423
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 13
17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE () () () (/)
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the '
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife speaes, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or
eliminate important examples of the mafor penods
of California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are indiwdually () () () (/)
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means that the
incremental effects of a protect are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future pro~ects)7
c) Does the protect have environmental effects that () () () (/)
will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or mduectly~
Comments:
• a-c) The proposed protect will not degrade the quality of the existing environment or have adverse
cumulative impacts that will adversely affect humans, either directly or indirectly The
condominium map is a division of au space and not located in such hazardous areas There
no environmental impacts of the proposed condomwum map
EARLIER ANALYSES
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one
or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section
15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately
analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects
were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses
were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Croic Center Dnve (check all that apply)
(/) General Plan FEIR
(SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001)
(/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update
(SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989)
A-49
Initial Study for
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17423
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 14
APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
I certify that I am the applicant for the protect descnbed in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have
read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or
proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the
effects to a poi here cle rly/pp i nificant envir~ enta effects would occur
/I ~ n /~ „ /l~ ~ 00
Signature
Print Name and Title
U~~~-~
C~
•
•
A-50
City of Rancho Cucamonga
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code.
Project File No.: Tentatwe Parcel Map SUBTPM17423. Related file DRC2005-00585
Public Review Period Closes: May 10, 2006
Project Name: Project Applicant: CIP Real Estate
Chuck McKenna
19762 Mac Arthur Boulevard, Swte 300
Irvine, CA 92612
Project Location (also see attached map): Located in the Haven Overlay Distract (Subarea 6) at
the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Trademark Parkway - APN: 0210-061-017.
Project Description: A request to subdivide 3 37 net acres of land into a single parcel for 26
condominwm units.
• FINDING
This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an
Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is
proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding:
The Initial Study indicates that there is no substantial evidence that the proiect may have a
significant effect on the environment
If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be
required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study.
The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho
Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax
(9091477-2847.
NOTICE
The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period.
May10 2006
Date of Determination
U
Adopted By
A-51
RESOLUTION NO 06-49
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
SUBTPM17423, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 3 37 NET ACRES OF LAND INTO
A SINGLE PARCEL FOR 26 CONDOMINIUM UNITS IN THE HAVEN AVENUE
OVERLAY DISTRICT (SUBAREA 6), LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF HAVEN AVENUE AND TRADEMARK PARKWAY, AND MAKING FINDINGS
IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0210-061-017
A Recitals
1 CIP Real Estate, Inc , filed an application for approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17423,
as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map
request is referred to as "the application "
2 On the 10th day of May 2006, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public heanng
for the above-descnbed map and concluded said heanng on that date
3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred
B Resolution
• 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Rectals, PartA, of
this Resolution are true and correct
2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the
above-referenced public heanng on May 10, 2006, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows
a The subject property is within the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) and Haven Avenue
Overlay Distnct, and
The application is in contunction with the development of nine professional buildings, and
c The application proposes to convert the proposed nine professional office buildings into
26 condominwm units
3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the
above-referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby fords and concludes as follows
a That Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17423 is consistent with the General Plan,
Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and
b That the design or improvements of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17423 is consistent
• with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speafic plans, and
A-52
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 069
SUBTPM17423 - CIP REAL ESTATE
May 10, 2006
Page 2
c That the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and •
d That the design of the condominium subdivision is not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage and avoidable intury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and
e That Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17423 is not likely to cause serious public health
problems, and
f That the design of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17423 will not conflict with any
easement acgwred by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within
the proposed subdivision.
g The proposal is compatible with the obtectroe, policies, elements, and program speafied
in the General Plan, and
The design or improvement of the protect is consistent with applicable General Plan, and
i The proposal is consistent with the purposes of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,
Title 17 Development Code, Chapter 17 22, and
The proposal promotes the health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the City
4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together
with all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment forthe application, the Planning .
Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon
the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this
reference, based upon the findings as follows
a Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA
Gwdelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the protect
Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that there was no substantial
evidence that the protect would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination,
a Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public
comment penod and of the intent to adopt the Negative Declaration
b The Planning Commission has reviewed the Negative Declaration and all comments
received regarding the Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds (i) that the
Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA, and (n) that there is no substantial evidence
that the protect will have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission further finds
that the Negative Declaration reflects the independenttudgment and analysis of the Planning Commission
Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Negative Declaration
c Pursuant to the requirements of California Fish and Game Code Section 711 4 and Title
14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 753 5, the Planning Commission finds, based on the
Initial Study, the Negative Declaration, and considenng the record as a whole, that there is "no" evidence
before the City that the proposed protect will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources
or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends The protect is a drnsion of air space with no physical
environmental report Based on substantial evidence, the Planning Commission hereby makes a
declaration rebutting the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in California Department of Fish and •
Game Regulation 753 5 (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Code, Section 753 5 )
A-53
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-49
SUBTPM17423 - CIP REAL ESTATE
May 10, 2006
• Page 3
d The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Negative Declaration and all other materials
which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the
City Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Those documents are available for public rewew in the
Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750
5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this
Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in
the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference
Plamm~q Department
1) Before the final map is recorded, the applicant shall submit a copy of the
proposed declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs)
that will apply and which shall include an agreement for common area
maintenance including faalities and landscaping, together with an estimate of
the initial assessment fees anticipated for such maintenance, a description of
a provision for maintenance of vehicular access areas within a protect, and
an indication of appropriate responsibditiesfpr maintenance of all utility lines
and services for each umt
2) Tenant's right to aurchase As provided in Government Code Section
664271(b), any present tenant or tenants of any umt shall be given a
• nontransferable right of first refusal to purchase the unit occupied at a price
no greater than the pace offered to the general public The right of first
refusal shall extend for at least 60 days from the date of issuance of the
subdivision public report or commencement of sales, whichever date is later
Engineering Department
1) Haven Avenue existing public improvements shall be protected in place or
replace, as required
a) Conduit and pertinent structures for a fiber optic cable link shall be
installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer
b) Provide a northbound busbay per City Standard 119 at the northeast
comer of Haven Avenue and Trademark parkway
2) Trademark Parkway existing public improvements shall be protected in place
or replace as required
a) Remove the most westerly drive approach on Trademark Parkway and
install curb and gutter, sidewalk, and street trees
3) Winston Avenue existing public improvement shall be protected in place or
replace as required
• a) Reconstruct the existing drive approach to a minimum of 35 feet wide
per City Standard 101 Type C
A-54
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-49
SUBTPM17423 - CIP REAL ESTATE
May 10, 2006
Page 4
4) Revise the existing street improvement plans to reflect the required additional
public improvements
a) The existing street improvement plans shall be reviewed for additional
street trees on Winston Avenue and Trademark Parkway, including the
median and Haven Avenue
5) An in lieu fee as reimbursement for the previously undergrounded overhead
utilities (telecommunications and electrical on the opposite side of Haven
Avenue) shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the final map or
issuance of Building Permit The amount shall be one-half of the actual cost
of the undergroundmg of said utilities fronting Haven Avenue frontage The
reimbursement fee is unavailable at this time since the said reimbursement
has not yet been submitted by Universal Technical Institute
6) An in lieu fee as contribution to the future undergroundmg of the existing
overhead utilities (telecommunications or electrical) on the opposite side of
Haven Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to map approval or issuance of
Bwldmg permits, whichever comes first The fee shall be one-half the City
adopted unit amount times the total distance measured from the existing
power poles north of Trademark Parkway to the centerline of Trademark
Parkway
7) The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) dated June 21, 2005, has
been reviewed, and the following items need to be completed
a) Project Site Information - Provide SIC Codes
http //www osha gov/pishmis/sic manual html
b) Protect Categories -Additional Category (#8 parking lots of 5,000
square feet) This will affect multiple sections, please revise WQMP as
needed
c) Section 1 2 -Provide permit numbers (List the Tract or Parcel Map No ,
DRC No ,PMT No ,and WDID No )
d) Section 1 3 - Provide a Site Plan identifying storm drain facilities and
structures, structural Best Management Practices (BMPs), stormwater
flow (drainage), and the receiving water
e) Section 2 1 -Complete this section (Guidance pages are available at
the front counter of Engineering )
f) Section 2 2 -Complete this section
g) Section 2 3 -Complete this section
h) Section 3 2 -Complete this section (Use the format provided by the
template )
•
•
A-55
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-49
SUBTPM17423 - CIP REAL ESTATE
May 10, 2006
• Page 5
i) Section 3 2 -The City of Rancho Cucamonga Catch Basin Labeling
Standard is "Keep Gutters Clean For Those Down Stream "
~) Section 3 2 -Provide specifications for filtration devices referenced
k) Section 3 2 -Provide all the fact sheets referenced in the table
I) Section 3 2 -Review and revise maintenance responsibility and
funding source for O & M for each BMP
m) Section 3 3 -Complete this section (Use the format provided by the
template )
n) Section 3 4 -Refer to the California Stomwater BMP Handbook for
definitions and specifications for Treatment Control BMPs Verify
whether selections m the table meet the defimtions and speafications in
the handbook
http /Nuww cabmphandbooks com/developmentesp
o) Section 3 4 1 -Complete this section (Flo-Gard Fossil Filters are
flow-based BMPs )
p) Section 6 -Notarize and record the City's "Memorandum ofAgreement
. of Storm Water Quality Management Plan " (Copies are available at
the front counter of Engineering )
q) Plan Rewew -Show and label the applicable BMPs that are identified
m the WQMP on the Grading Plan
6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY 2006
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY
Pam Stewart, Chairman
ATTEST
Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary
I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
. Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 10th day of May 2006, by the following vote-to-wit
q-56
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-49
SUBTPM17423 - CIP REAL ESTATE
May 10, 2006
Page 6
AYES COMMISSIONERS
NOES COMMISSIONERS
ABSENT COMMISSIONERS
•
•
•
A-57
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT #: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17423
SUBJECT: CONDOMINIUMS
APPLICANT: CIP REAL ESTATE
LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND TRADEMARK PARKWAY
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
General Requirements
1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, Its
agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or in the aftematlve, to
relinquish such approval The appllcant shall reimburse the City, Its agents, offlcers, or
employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the Clty, its agents, officers, or
employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such actlon The City may, at Its sole
discretion, participate at Its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation
shall not relieve appllcant of his obligations under this condition
2 Approval of Tentative Parcel No 17423 is granted subject to the approval of Development
Review DRC2005-00585
3 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 06-49, Standard
Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be Included on the plans (full size). The
sheet(s) are for information only to all parties Involved In the construction/grading activities and
are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect
B. Time Limits
This tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a
complete final map Is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval
C. Site Development
1 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all
• other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the
time of building permit Issuance
Page 1
I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM12006 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM77423 c'.+^^^'' 0-10 doc
Comolet~on Date
~~-
~~.
_/~
~~.
A-58
Protect No SUBTPM17423
Comoletion Date
The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the
Owners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments
and the Clty Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the
Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the
City Engineer The Owners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the
name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever
said information changes
3. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property
owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape
maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to
the issuance of building permits
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
D.
Dedication and Vehicular Access
Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards
Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be
dedicated to the City
E.
Street Improvements
Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source
of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes
and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and
ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been
completed and accepted by the City Council, except that In developments containing more than
one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of
those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by
conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or
units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by
these conditions of approval of development
2 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to
Street Name Curb 8
Gutter A.C
Pvmt Side-
walk Drive
Appr Street
Lights Street
Trees Comm
Trail Median
Island Bike
Treil
Other
Haven Avenue X X X X X (e)
Trademark Parkway X X X X
Winston Avenue X X X X
Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and Irrigation on meter (b) Pavement
reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk
shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be
provided for this item (e) Bus Bay
Improvement Plans and Construction
a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and Intersection safety lights
on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be
posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City
Attomey guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to
final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
2
I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMMt2006 Res 8 Sd Rpt\SUBTPM174: joc
~ ~
•
~~
_/~_
~~-
_/~
•
-/~-
~-~.
L J
A-59
Protect No SUBTPM17423
Comoletion Date
b Pnor to any work being performed In public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a ~ _/___/_
C~
•
construction permit shall be obtained from the Clty Engineer's Office in addition to any
other permits required
c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and _/~_
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Ciry Engrneer
d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction ~_/_
protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and
interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside
of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer
Notes•
1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200
feet apart, unless otherwise specfied by the City Engrneer
2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified
e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City _/_/_
Standards or as directed by the Ciry Engineer
f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with ~~_
adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash
deposit shall be provided to cover the cast of grading and paving, which shall be refunded
upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be _/_/_
installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots
h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. _/~_
4 Provide a minimum of 3-inch condwt for future fiber optic use on all streets with connection
through the parkway to each lot or parcel (fiber-to-the curb, FTTC) The size, placement, and
location of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subtect to City
Engineer review and approval poor to issuance of building permits or final map approval,
whichever comes first
5 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards In _/~_
accordance with the City's street tree program
I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMMi2006 Res 8 Stt Rpt\SUBTPM1742: - -
A-60
Protect No SUBTPM17423
Comoletion Date
Install street trees per City street tree design gwdelines and standards as follows The completes
legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street
improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction
legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically
sheet 1) ° Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be
per the public landscape improvement plans
The Clty Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other
variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer
Min Grow
Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Spaee Spacing Slze Gty.
Haven Avenue Magnolia grandiflora NCN 3' 20' O C 15 gal FIII
'St, Mary in
Primary Tree In Brachychiton Bottle Tree 8' 25' O C 15 gal
Masses, Mainly Informal
Behind Sidewalk
Trademark Prunius blireiana NCN 3' 20' O C 15 gal
Parkway
P A, Less Than 8'
Winston Ave Piatanus acerifolia London plane 8' 30' O C. 15 gal
Tree
Construction Notes for Street Trees.
1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans
2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to
the City Inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil
amendments, as determined by the Ciry inspector.
3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department
4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only
F
Public Maintenance Areas
A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting
Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or Issuance of building
permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer.
Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective
Beautification Master Plan Haven Avenue
G.
Improvement Completion
If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map,
an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City
will be required for Haven Avenue, Trademark Parkway, and Winston Avenue
H.
Utilities
Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas,
electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) In accordance with the Utility
Standards Easements shall be provided as required
2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.
3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the
Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Flre Protection District, and the
Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from
I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM17423 Stn r•.^^~ ~ ' ^ tloc
~_f
C~
r1
LJ
~~-
~~.
~-/-
~~.
~_~-
-J_/-
•
A-61
Protect No SUBTPM17423
the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or Issuance of permits, whichever occurs first
Such letter must have been Issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval
• in the case of subdivision or prior to the Issuance of permits in the case of all other residential
projects
4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other Interested agencies Involved
Approval of the final parcel map well be subject to any requirements that may be received from
them
General Requirements and Approvals
A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the Clty, covering the estimated operating costs for all
new streetlights for the first six months of operation, priorto final map approval or priorto building
permit issuance if no map Is involved
Prior to the Issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall
be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit Is fully refundable if
at least 50% of aIi wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from
landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the Clty Form CD-1 shall be submitted to
the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and
Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following
the completion of the construction and/or demolition project.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION
PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
SEE ATTACHED
•
•
\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM~2006 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM17a29 Std Cond 5-10 doc
Completion Date
-/~-
_~~
-/~
A-62
~~~ :~a~ : Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
- District
`-- Fire Construction Services
STANDARD CONDITIONS
November 2, 2005
Stone Haven Executive Park
(7) Commeraal Bwldings
SUBTPM17423 and DRC2005-00585
THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT.
FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply
1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the
spaang and location of fire hydrants.
a The maximum distance between fire hydrants m commerciaUindustrial protects is
• 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an
approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet.
b Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are:
At the entrance(s) to a commeraal, industrial or residential protect from the
public roadways
u At intersections
ui On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible.
iv As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire
District
v A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any bwlding
c If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire
hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or bwlding,
additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required
fire flow shall be provided.
d Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of regwred fire flow or fraction thereof.
•
A-63
FSC-2 Fire Flow
The required fire flow for this protect is 2,000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual •
pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire
Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances
2 The requred minimum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed
is 1,500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch.
This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire
sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring. This
regwrement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as
adopted by the Fire Distract Ordinances.
3. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used
to provde the regwred fire flow subject to Fire District rewew and approval Private fire
hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow.
4. Firewater plans are required for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to
or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are
approved.
On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet
of the proposed protect site.
FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems
Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant •
shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system
underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be
obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans
FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems
Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other
applicable standards regwre an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in: ,
Commeraal or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet
Assembly and Educational Occupancy Buildings.
3. "All structures that do not meet Fire Distract access regwrements (see Fire Access).
4. When regwred fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure.
5. When buildings do not meet the regwrements of the 2001 Califorrna Budding Code and
the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard 9-7
6. When any applicable code or standard requires the structure to be sprinklered
FSC-5 Fire Alarm System
1 RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or •
standards) requres an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system. Refer to RCFPD
A-64
Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Building Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6
• and/or the California Fire Code.
2. Prior to any removal, remodel, modification and/or additions to the building or swte's fire
alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a building permit must be
obtained. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services m
accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6
3. Based on the number of sprinkler heads; the sprinkler system is required to monitored by
a listed central station fire alarm system.
FSC-6 Fire District Site Access
Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private
roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire
Lanes Standard 9-7
1. Location of Access All portions of the structures 1s' story exterior wall shall be located
within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the
exterior of the bwlding Landscaped areas, unpaved changes m elevation, gates and
fences are deemed obstructions
2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards
are.
• a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet.
b. The maximum inside turn radws shall be 20-feet.
c The minimum outside turn radws shall be 46-feet
d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet.
e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches
f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on
each side.
g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent
h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%
i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW)
~. Trees and shrubs planted adfacent to the fire lane shall be kept trammed to a
minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to
obstruct Fire Department apparatus.
3. Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be
provided as follows.
• a In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided m accordance with
the 2001 California Bwlding Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards.
3
A-65
b In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal
feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access •
roadways When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire
District access to all required openings
4. Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire
apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings
5. CommerciaUlndustrial Gates Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road
shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2 The following design requirements
apply
a Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are regwred to be
submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of
the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final
acceptance must be requested from FCS
b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward.
c. Gates may be motorized or manual.
d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet.
e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety
Office for $20 00
f Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second •
g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override
deuce and afail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the
locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction.
h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch The switch must
be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location.
i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the
complex
~. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the deuce, location and
operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or
multiple sensors may be regwred due to complexity of the various entry
configurations
6. Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site
plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire Distract standards
shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval.
7. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly
noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if
applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan
review •
4
A-66
FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits
. Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly assoaated with the business operations and/or
building construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval
of the permit, field inspection is required prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be
regwred for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of
the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property.
• Battery Systems
• Candles and open flames in public assemblies
• Compressed Gases
• Public Assembly
• Cryogenics
• Dry Cleaning Plants
• Hazardous Materials
• Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures
• Liquefied Petroleum Gases
FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services
Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of bwldings and/or the installation of
• egwpment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001
California Bwlding, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and
FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards.
FSC-13 Alternate Method Application
Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate
method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for
Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee.
FCS-14 Map Recordation
RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are
regwred on this project The project appears to be located on a property that is being
subdivided A reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners.
Reciprocal access agreement -Please provide a permanent access agreement between the
owners granting irrevocable and anon-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gam
access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction,
gate, fence, bwlding or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire
Department approval The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the
assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District.
Reciprocal water covenant -Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant
• between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire
District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire
A-67
hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general). The covenant shall have provisions for
emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District
The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino Recorders Office The
Fire Construction Services Unit shall approve the agreement prior to recordation The recorded
agreement shall include a copy of the site plan The agreement shall be recorded with the
County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office. The Fire Construction Services Umt shall approve
the agreement, prior to recordation
Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard
Conditions
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to
the issuance of any building permits:
Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans,
specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for revew
and approval by the Fire Distract. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distract
Standards Approval of the on-site (prroate) fire underground and water plans is regwred
prior to any bwlding permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site
combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with
RCFPD Standards # 9-8. The Bwlding and Safety Division and Fire Construction Services
wdl perform plan checks and inspections
All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering
any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services wdl inspect the
installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped
3. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems. The applicant shall submit a plan
showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the
Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot
radius of the protect Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure
Standard 9-8
4. All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering
any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the
installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the
site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services
must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped.
5. Construction Access• The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the
requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access
roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road.
6. Fire Flow. A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is
responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to
Fire Construction Services
Easements and Reciprocal Agreements:
recorded with the County of San Bernardino
All easements and agreements must be
•
u
6
A-68
PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER
The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction
Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures"
PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following:
Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker
indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of
Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant
Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire
access road, at each hydrant location.
2 Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler
contractor, m the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most
hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants The underground fire Ime contractor, developer
and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test
report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available.
The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow m accordance with the
Cahforrna Fire Code.
3 Fire Sprinkler System• Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire
sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services.
4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring• Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire
sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services.
The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately
following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subfect to the release of power)
5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be
inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted
and/or egwpment is placed m service.
6 Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm
system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services.
7. Access Control Gates. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular
gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-2
by Fire Construction Services.
8 Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire
access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable
to Fire Construction Services
9. The CC&R's, the reaprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be
recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit
parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the
requred annual inspections and the maintenance of all regwred fire access roadways.
10. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commerciaVindustrial and
. multi-family bwldmgs shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting
background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness.
7
A-69
When the budding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-
dluminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance
Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with
large setbacks in multi-tenant commeraal and industnal buildings The suite designation
numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites
11 Hazardous Materials Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant
must demonstrate (in venting from the County) that the faality has met or is meeting the
Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San
Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and
Enforcement Division. The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire
Construction Services
12 Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the
Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form
This form provides contact information for Fire Distract use in the event of an emergency at
the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction
Services Inspector
13. Mapping Site Plan Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, an 8'rz" x 11" or
11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised
by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as
regwred in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire
Inspector.
u
8
A-70