Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2006/07/12 - Agenda Packet
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RnxcHO JULY 12, 2006 - 7:00 PM CUCAMONGA Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California • • I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Stewart Vice Chairman Macias Fletcher _ McPhail _ Munoz ~~ II. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS ~~ PRESENTATION OF THE 2005 DESIGN AWARDS II III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES JI June 28, 2006 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consenf Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial They wdl be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion If anyone has concern over any item, ~t should be removed for discussion A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2004- 01198 -LILY KAUT- The review of site plans and elevations for 6 single- family homes on 2 99 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 6956 East Avenue -APN 0227-121-33 and 37 Related File Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration ~ .,f A ~ ,r, I PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA I JULY 12, 2006 RANCHO CUCAMONGA V. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned indwiduals may voice their , op~mon of the related pro/ect Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be I~mited to 5 minutes per individual for each pro/ect Please sign m after speaking B ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 - KAUT - A request to subdivide 2 99 acres of land into 6 single-family lots in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling urnts per acre), located at 6956 East Avenue -APN 0227-121-33 and 37 Related Fde Design Review DRC2004-01198 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negatroe Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17222 -NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT - A request to subdivide 0 92 acre of land into 4 lots in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located 100 feet north of Vivero Street, on the east side of Camelian Street, at the terminus of Candlewood Avenue -APN 0207-551-73 Related file Variance DRC2005-01078 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration CONTINUED FROM 6/28 D VARIANCE DRC2005-01078 -NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT - A request to reduce the required average lot area of 8,000 square feet to 7,903 square feet fora 4 lot subdivision on 0 92 acre in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling unds per acre), located 100 feet north of Vivero Street, on the east side of Camelian Street -APN 0207-551-73 Related file Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17222 CONTINUED FROM 6/28 E VARIANCE-DRC2006-00477-NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT-A request to increase the permitted wall height along the west property line by a maximum 3 feet in order to attenuate traffic noise from Carnelian Street fora 4 lot subdivision on 0 92 acre of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling unds per acre), located 100 feet north of Vivero Street, on the east side of Camelian Street -APN 0207-551-73 Related File Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17222 CONTINUED FROM 6128 F VARIANCE - DRC2006-00519 -NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT - A request to decrease the 40-foot minimum property line lot width requirement by 20 feet for 1 lot of a 4 lot subdivision m the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located 100 feet north of Vivero Street, on the east side of Carnelian Street -APN 0207-551-73 Related Fde Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17222 • n U 2 of 4 1 • • C~ i PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA _ , JULY 12, 2006 RANOFiO CIJCAMONGA VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be , discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda VII. COMMISSION BUSINESS G ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN POSITIONS FOR THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSIONS H CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENTS FOR DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE , VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Plannmg Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m adloumment hme If items go beyond that hme, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission 1, Lois J Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on July 6, 2006, at least 72 hours poor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga w~ If you need speaal assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 46 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ® ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with 3 of 4 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA JULY 12, 2006 RANCHO cUCAMONGA a previous speaker If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podum located at the center of the staff table State your name for the record and speak into the microphone After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments " There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing The deadline for submitting these items is 6 00 p m Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting The Planning Commission Secretary receroes all such items AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7 00 a m to 6 00 p m ,except for legal City holidays APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Councl within 10 calendar days Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $1,747 for maps and $1,842 for all other decisions of the Commission (Fees are established and governed by the City Council) Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is m session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at http://www.ci.rancho-Cucamonga ca us • 4of4 ti Vicinity Map Planning Commission July 12, 2006 • ~, Q ~ Meefing Location• " City Hall 10500 Civic Center Dnve THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO JULY 12 20 GUCAMONGA , 06 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Stewart Vice Chairman Macias Fletcher _ McPhail _ Munoz II II. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS ~~ PRESENTATION OF THE 2005 DESIGN AWARDS I~ III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ~~ June 28. 2006 I~ IV. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial They will be acted on by the Commission atone bme without discussion If anyone has concern over any item, ~t should be removed for discussion A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2004- 01198 -LILY KAUT- The review of site plans and elevations for 6 single- family homes on 2 99 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 6956 East Avenue - APN 0227-121-33 and 37 Related File Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration ~ „s n _ PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA JULY 12, 2006 R~~NO CUCAMONCA V. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related pro/ect Please wait to be recognrzed by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each pro/ect Please sign in after speaking B ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 - KAUT - A request to subdivide 2 99 acres of land into 6 single-family lots in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 6956 East Avenue -APN 0227-121-33 and 37 Related File Design Review DRC2004-01198 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17222 -NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT - A request to subdivide 0 92 acre of land into 4 lots in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located 100 feet north of Vivero Street, on the east side of Camelian Street, at the terminus of Candlewood Avenue -APN 0207-551-73 Related file Variance DRC2005-01078 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration CONTINUED FROM 6/28 D VARIANCE DRC2005-01078-NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT-Arequestto reduce the required average lot area of 8,000 square feet to 7,903 square feet fora 4 lot subdivision on 0 92 acre in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling unts per acre), located 100 feet north of Vivero Street, on the east side of Carnelian Street -APN 0207-551-73 Related file Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17222 CONTINUED FROM 6/28 E VARIANCE-DRC2006-00477-NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT-Arequestto increase the permitted wall height along the west property line by a maximum 3 feet in order to attenuate traffic noise from Carnelian Street fora 4 lot subdivision on 0 92 acre of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located 100 feet north of Vivero Street, on the east side of Carnelian Street -APN 0207-551-73 Related File Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17222 CONTINUED FROM 6/28 F VARIANCE - DRC2006-00519 -NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT - A request to decrease the 40-foot minimum property line lot width requirement by 20 feet for 1 lot of a 4 lot subdivision in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located 100 feet north of Vivero Street, on the east side of Carnelian Street -APN 0207-551-73 Related File Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17222 2 of 4 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA JULY 12, 2006 RnNCeo G'UCAMONGA VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS Thts is the time and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda VII. COMMISSION BUSINESS G ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN POSITIONS FOR THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSIONS H CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENTS FOR DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m ad/ournment time If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission 1, Lois J Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on July 6, 2006, at least 72 hours poor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga w~ If you need special assistance or accommodations to partiapate m this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750 Notifcation of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ® ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the heanng impaired INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with 3 of 4 _ PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ~~HO JULY 12, 2006 cUCAMONGA a previous speaker If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table State your name for the record and speak into the microphone After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments " There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing The deadline for submitting these items is 6 00 p m Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting The Planning Commission Secretary receroes all such items AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drrve, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 These documents are available for public inspections dunng regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7 00 a m to 6 00 p m ,except for legal City holidays APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $1,747 for maps and $1,842 for all other decisions of the Commission (Fees are established and governed by the City Council) Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is m session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at http.l/www ci.rancho-cucamonga ca us 4of4 T H E C I T Y O F RANCflO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE July 12, 2006 TO~ Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Lois Schrader, Plamm~g Commisslon Secretary ' SUBJECT ELECTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION OFFICERS BACKGROUND The Plamm~g Commisslon Administrative Regulations provide for electron of Chatrman and Vlce Chairman to July of each year RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission should elect a Chatrman and Vtce Chairman to serve for one-year terms Respectfully submitted ~, o~,~l' Ja s R Troyer, AICP Plamm~g Director JT/LS Is ITEM G I tPLANNINGtFINALtPLNGCOMM12006 Res & Stt RpttPC Ofc Stf Rpt 07-06 doc MEMO TO Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission FROM Rancho Cucamonga residents and property owners DATE July 11'", 2006 SUBJECT Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17222-NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT We, the undersigned, object to A vanance to reduce the required average lot area of 8,000 square feet to 7,903 square feet fora 4 lot subdrv~s~on on 0 92 acre m the Low Residential Dismct (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located 100 feet north of Vrvero Street on the east side of Carnelian Street - APN 207-551-73 Related File Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17222 A vanance to decrease the 40 foot mm~mum property line lot width requirement by 20 feet for one lot of a four lot subdrvision m the Low Residential Drstnct (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located 100 feet north of Vivero Street on the east side of Camehan Street - APN 207-551-73 Related File Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17222 Name Address Signature MEMO TO Rancho Cucamonga Planning Comm~ss~on FROM Rancho Cucamonga residents and property owners DA'I'S July 11's, 2006 SUBJECT Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17222-NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT We, the undersigned, object to A vanance to reduce the required average lot area of 8,000 square feet to 7,903 square feet fora 4 lot subdrns~on on 0 92 acre m the Low Residential D~stnct (2-4 dwelling amts per acre) located 100 feet north of Vivero Street on the east side of Camehan Street - APN 207-551-73 Related File Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17222 A vanance to decrease the 40 foot mm~mum property Ime lot width requirement by 20 feet for one lot of a four lot subdrnsion m the Low Residential Distnct (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located 100 feet north of Vrvero Street on the east side of Cameluin Street - APN 207-551-73 Related File Tentatwe Parcel Map SUBTPM17222 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-65 SUBTT 16578 -Lily Kaut July 12, 2006 Page 3 adverse effect as set forth m California Department of Fish and Game Regulation 753 5 (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Code, Section 753 5 ) e The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750 4 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) All perimeter walls facing public view shall be made of a decorative material 2) The applicant shall provide written permission from adjacent property owners for any off-site grading prior to issuance of grading ~~ permits Engineering Department 1) Street "A" shall be improved in accordance with City "Local Street" standards including curb and gutters, a.c. pavement, street lights, street trees, sidewalk, drive approaches, traffic signs and stripings• The cul-de-sac bulb shall be per City Std 111. The developer shall make a good faith effort to negotiate with owners of APN's 227-121-34 and 227-121-36 regarding privately maintained landscaping and irrigation along their sideyards on Street "A". Improvements are to be installed to the street curb. Plans for these areas wdl be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division, with exception to street trees. If the owners are not wdlmg to negotiate said improvements, install rockscape on the parkway, per City Standards. Provide drive approaches for existing "Not A Part" residences to Street "A". The developer may request reimbursement agreement to recover the amount for installation of permanent public improvements from future development as it occurs on either side of the street fronting APN's 227-121-34 and 227- g-~ B - 9 8 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-65 SUBTT 16578 -Lily Kaut July 12, 2006 Page 4 121-36 If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all nghts d the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 2) The developer shall make a good faith effort to negotiate with owners of APNs 227-121-34 and 227-121-36 an exchange of corner cutoffs dedications on East Avenue for sidewalks and curb returns on both corners. • Remove or relocate existing power pole located at the northwest corner of East Avenue and Street "A". 3) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Street "A" shall be undergrounded from the first pole offsite most westerly on Street "A" to the first pole offsite Street "A" on East Avenue, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever comes first. All services crossing Street "A" shall be undergrounded at the same time The developer may request reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted amount for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on either side of the street fronting APN 227-121-34 and 227-121-36. If the developer fads to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 4) Development within Etiwanda/San Sevame Area 8 is required to install master plan storm drams and mtenm basins Interim Basin No. 5 and the storm dram m East Avenue were both constructed by Tract 15912, south of the subject tract. Tentative Tract 16578 can satisfy its condition to install storm drams through the payment of fees. However, those fees do not cover the interim basin. The developer of Tract 15912 is eligible to request reimbursement forthe proportionate cost of the land and ultimate basin related facilities (outlet, etc.). They must request said reimbursement within six months of the public storm dram facilities being accepted by the City. Therefore,this development will need to deposit $5,000 per gross acre in Tentative Tract 16578 with the City for the purpose of reimbursing the developer ofTract 15972. If reimbursement is not requested within six months of public improvement acceptance, the deposit will be returned to developer of Tentative Tract 16578. 5) An m-lieu fee as reimbursementfortheyreviously undergrounded overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except the 66 KV electrical) on the opposite side of East Avenue shall be paid to the City pnorto issuance of budding permits. The amountshall ~+ 3 --~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-65 SUBTT 16578 -Lily Kaut July 12, 2006 Page 5 be one-half of the actual cost of undergrounding of said utilities fronting East Avenue 86-foot frontage. The reimbursement fee is unavailable at this time since Tract 16189 is still under construction. 6) Reimburse adjacent developers for oversizmg of interim drainage facilities. 7) The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) submitted with tentative map application has been reviewed and found to be substantially complete. Include the Best Management Practices (BMP's) identified m the plan on grading plans when submitted for technical plan check. [mod. ~~tn~ ~p„~b,t~'ovd' Environmental Mdigation Air Quality 8) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 9) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, orthat their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South CoastAir Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff 10) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand orhigh-volume, low-pressure spray 11) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 12) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 06-61 SUBTPM17222 - NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT July 12, 2006 Page 4 2) Approval is also granted for a Minor Exception to allow a maximum calculated wall height of 8 feet along the north and south property lines 3) All perimeter walls shall be constructed of decorative block and the free standing portion of the walls shall be 6 feet in height and have a uniform design compatible to those in the area, to the satisfaction of the Planning Director Enpineennp Department 1) Carnelian Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Secondary Street" standards as required and including a) No driveway to Carnelian Street b) Remove existing dnve approach and install curb and gutter c) Provide street lights, street trees, traffic striping and signage, as required d) Remove the diagonal block walls and replace with new ones to align with the straight existing block walls e) Revise City Drawing 1286 Sheets 1, 4, 8, and 11 to reflect above required improvements including irrigation system 2) Candlewood Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Local Street" standards as required and including a) Provide a c pavement, curb and gutter, property line adjacent sidewalk, street lights, street trees, dnve approaches, traffic striping and s~gnage, as required b) The asseptable proposed sidewalk shall be curb adtacent along the south side of Lot 1 dnve approach and the sidewalk shall transition from back of the drive approach with a 5-foot sidewalk easement up to the easterly property boundary of Lot 4 This will create a 5-foot or 6-foot parkway between curb face and sidewalk The portion at the back of the proposed curb adjacent sidewalk of Lot 1, dust west of Lot 99 of Tract 9157 shall be rockscaped to City Standards C, v E l~ - ~`"~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 06-61 SUBTPM17222 - NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT July 12, 2006 Page 5 4) The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) submitted with tentative map application has been reviewed and found to be substantially complete Include the Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the plan on grading plans when submitted for technical plan check Environmental Mdigation Measures Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed bythe South CoastAir Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand orhigh-volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads Protect No SUBTPM17222 Completion Date E. Environmental 1 Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures Noise levels shall be monltored by actual noise level readings taken on-and off-site A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Clty Planner review and approval prior to final occupancy release The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA 2 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of Interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The building plans well be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained In the final report 3 The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented In construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with Clty standards Certification shall be N~ # submitted to the Building & Safety Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Dedication and Vehicular Access Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following street Carnelian Avenue All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map G. Street Improvements Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit Is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all Improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter A C Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Carnelian Street X X X X X (e) Candlewood Street X X X X X X Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and Irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) walls -~-~- _~-~. / / -~-~- -~- - I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM172225td Cond 7-12 doc Protect No SUBTPM77222 Completion Dale Improvement Plans and Construction a Street Improvement plans, Including street trees, street Ilghts, and intersection safety Ilghts on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street Improvements, prior to f nal map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Clty Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduct, and Interconnect conduit shall be Installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be Installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be Installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing Clty roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to Clty Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per Clty Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program G.D ~ F - g~ -~- - / I -~- - -~-~- -~-~- -~- - -~-~- -~-- -~-~- I \PLANNING\PINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stt Rpt\SUBTPM17222Std Cond 7-12 doc Protect No SUBTPM17222 Completion Date Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street Improvement plans Street improvement plans shall Include a line Item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be Installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree Installation In those areas shall be per the public landscape Improvement plans The Clty Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional Information, contact the Protect Engineer Mm Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty CarnehanNlneyard Fdl In Frontage Concept Rhus lances African Sumac 5' 20' O C 15 Gal Foreground Tree Formal Background Tree Plantanus London Plane Tree 8' 30' O C 15 Gal acerifolla Informal Candlewood Street Plsfaaa Chinese Plstache 5' 30' O C 15 Gal Under utilities Lagerstoemia Crape Myrtle Hybrid 3' 20" O C 24" Indica chinensis Box Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted In accordance with Clty standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the Clty Inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the Clty Inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to Inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public Improvement plans only H Public Maintenance Areas A revised set of landscape and Irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the Clty Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District Carnelian Street A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Clty Engineer prior to final map approval or Issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer Drainage and Flood Control Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adtacent areas J. Improvement Completion If the required public Improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an Improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the Clty well be required for Carnelian Street &Candlewood Street Curb/gutter, A C pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, street lights, street trees, block wall C, .~, E,F - ~~ (A) -/-/- _/-- I I / / -/- - I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Slf Rpt\SUBTPM17222Std Cond 7-12 doc Protect No SUBTPM17222 Completion Date K. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utlllty Standards Easements shall be provided as required The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential pro)ects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any requirements that may be received from them L. General Requirements and Approvals A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the Clty, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to fnal map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the frst building permit application is submitted to Bwlding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect - Er~d New co*J ~ ~' o N s APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS• NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) M. General Requirements Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Slte/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, waterandwaste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and C~ 4~, ~~F - 81 CSJ / / / / -/- . -/-- -/-- -/- - -/- - I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM17222Std Cond 7-12 doc Protect No SUBTPMt7222 Completion Date N. O. P g Planning Department Protect Number (i e , SUBTPM17222) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _I_I_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls _/_/_ 5 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can _/_/_ contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the protect file number (i e , SUBTPM17222) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential pro/ect or ma/or addition, the applicant _/_/_ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract parcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 8 30 a m Monday _/_I_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_I_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations _/_I_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions _I_/_ Grading 1 Grading of the sub/ect property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _I_/_ time of application for grading plan check C ~ AI ~~ ~ - ~' ~ C~~ I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM17222Sid Cond 7-12 doc Protect No SUBTPM17222 Comolehon Date The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permds A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer / / -~- $ C,~~F-81~~~ I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res 8 Stt Rpt\SUBTPM17222Std Cond 7-12 doc ~-,~.~ ~' •:.~ >r r ;;, ~- T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C H C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE July 12, 2006 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Emily Cameron, Associate Planner , , SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2004-01198 - LILY KAUT- The review of site plans and elevations for 6single-family homes on 2 99 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 6956 East Avenue -APN 0227-121-33 and 37 Related File Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 - KAUT - A request to subdivide 2 99 acres,of land into 6 single-family lots in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 6956 East Avenue -APN 0227-121-33 and 37 Related File Design Review DRC2004-01198 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Density 2 dwelling units per acre B Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Single-Family Homes, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South -Single-Family Homes, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Vacant Property, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), East Avenue West - Single-Family Homes, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) General Plan Designations Project Site -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) . C Site Characteristics The site is located approximately 330 feet west of East Avenue, and creates the cul-de-sac formation of "Street A," which intersects East Avenue To the north ITEMA&B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-01198 & SUBTT16578 -LILY KAUT July 12, 2006 . Page 2 and south are existing single-family residences, to the east are vacant parcels abutting East Avenue, and to the west is asingle-family home (Hippard Ranch) ANALYSIS A General The developer is proposing 6 single-family homes with a Trail Map in contunction with the development All proposed homes are two-story The site will be developed under the Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan The average lot size proposed is 15,696 square feet which meets or exceeds all Etiwanda Speafic Plan requirements The homes range from 4,400 to 4,742 square feet Four of the 6 homes provide side-on garages All homes include a 3-car garage Elevations include extended porches, stacked stone, shingle siding, full window pop-outs, bay windows, and shutter details The adtoining property owner to the west, Jim Banks, has met with staff and expressed his concern with the compatibility of two-story homes Mr Banks lives in a single-story home, an historic landmark, that is setback 115 feet from the shared property Ime with the proposed tract The proposed homes are 38 feet from the property Ime, therefore, there will be a combined building separation of 153 feet which is significantly greater than normally would occur For example, the minimum lot depth is 100 feet in this zone There is dense vegetation, including a Eucalyptus windrow, separating and buffering Mr Banks' • home from the proposed protect (see attached aerial photograph) The issue of single-story homes was raised at Design Review Committee (see below) The letter detailing the Banks' concerns was received July 3, 2006 and is attached as Exhibit I B Design Review Committee The Design Review Committee (Stewart, McPhail and, Coleman) reviewed the protect on two separate dates, May 2, 2006 and May 16, 2006 The Committee requested adding asingle-story plan on two or three of the lots The applicant revised all homes to include window pop-outs, wainscoting, longer and wider pop-outs, and additional stacked stone with the use of wrap around porches The Committee reviewed the revised protect on May 16, 2006 The applicant informed the Committee that the homes were essentially pre-sold and none of whom wanted a single-story home The Committee recommended approval (Exhibit F) on the basis that this is a small subdivision of custom homes designed for specific buyers C Technical Review Committee The Grading and Technical Review Committees have reviewed the protect and recommended approval subtect to the Standard Conditions attached D Neighborhood Meeting A neighborhood meeting was held on January 5, 2005, at City Hall A total of 5 residents attended, and were generally accepting of the layout and architectural style of the homes E Environmental Assessment Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the • potential environmental effects of the protect Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related A & B-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-01198 & SUBTT16578 -LILY KAUT July 12, 2006 Page 3 to construction noise, dust mitigation, and hydrology, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment, Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment penod and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the protect CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Dady Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within 2 300-foot radius of the project site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract SUBTT16578 and Design Review DRC2004-01198 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration Respectfully submitted, Jam s R Troyer, AICP • Planning Director JRT DC/bt Attachments Exhibit - A - Site Plan/Location Map Exhibit - B - Grading Plan Exhibit - C - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit - D - Fence and Wall Plan Exhibit - E - Elevations Exhibit - F - Design Review Committee Action Comments dated May 2, 2006 and May 16, 2006 Exhibit - G - Initial Study Exhibit - H - Aerial Photograph Exhibit - I -Letter dated July 3, 2006 from Jim and Marsha Banks Draft Resolution of Approval for SUBTT16578 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2004-001198 • A&B-3 II I ~ ~y`~G~1~~a~ Q N ~ --1-~',~ i ~ ~~ ~~ a~'I ~-~~~ C ~~ 0 ~"~ N ~-. E-~ W %/ r, i~ ~I J i ~~I I~ I ~ F K aW o~ Q 0 b ~1 Y ~~ ~\ \. ~ I ~ awl ^ ~~o Rio ~i~ a a p ' ^° z v > ~ d U ~- O g ~ S ' ? z - =a a `~~++ S fs p O 55 T ~' F -r e: !E B~f i k/i '~~ 3 dig ry ~ (~ ~~ i ~-i i ,~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ i a ~ ~ , >' / w> --~--L- a~ --~, I -_-3fW3nV 15V5J-___ _ry~ ----- o--iT ®~ lar~m ~ ' i p r~ lsaa?~vo~ ~-i i ~ i ' a ~~ ~~ ~a -- -- -- , o,~!!m ® p ~ o r---~ ~a J iarioo _ y ®; LL~~ ~~~menn~Id o ~~ O u~m' ® ~~I ~~ -~ Ir+vovn /, I' ~~~~ ~~N ddb Z~~~~d / - /. ~ ~", ~ 3(1N3/~b' H4NHMI13 ~_ _ • r a o-~+ L_.J I` tl I F •,°'-;~, "°" "°,•_ 6 ~ etsvi drx t~nu anuri.Me.t §~i r ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ A + ~ § (V g ~~~ ~ na+awmasmnua~Nw 5gg ~gg@ II~ I ~~ gg t v ~6 sa~isa ~w~ew.'rr,~a~x b'!~ ~ ]~P4s '~53s e~ t $~33 3 3 1 ! e 9 6 I ~ ~ ~ ~P • ~~ m ,r n i N ~ 1 i (N r 9 z 6 ~ 2 \ ~ x I Aga I~~ I ~/ I~ Q i~ V n Z 0 _ ~g i~ o r tl__~^ ~ _ _ . K f- O` m ?~ 5 ` ~ 1 ~` _fi_ _ ____ _ F / ~ y £ ,..< - 6 3 ~~ ~ 6 ~8g ~~ ~n ~~ ~g ~ 4~~i ~€, ~§ssCF~~ : aqq~ ~~~ @oe~'. 6.@ §tlE ~ ~- ~iMTiun ~~ a ~"~ - ~ _ ~ S P y 1 oai m,~~ ~ ~ °~°~ °' ~ v ~ ~~~ ~Y Y 5 @k F Ii1 q~y ~ ~bm- ~~ ~, @@ pb 6 g E S \~ ~ ~ m ~ yr N N ~w I ~ {~ i{ I I~ t~Yf Y2~j~ C J -}t~ ~ u = I a II jo a Q ~ v A & B-5 : `" a _ a 82591 dYN llYal BALLYllLfl ~~ ~ ~ ; _ ~ ~ ~ m a0d ~NIUYa9 TYNde)N07 @ [ ~ ~~ ~~~~w;q,,,;,.,,,,p,.,,~ z~~ ~ snouoasssoaa { 44i ~[~S3 i~ i ~9~~3 'F:~1~4 ~~ E ~ i ~ R. J p~ OI~¢ J~ Nx ~~ si•s...o-+.~:...~•... LRYI t~~ ~ 8CS9I dYR .L71'tl1 Lll1Y1NdL y~~ ~~~R ~g Itl~y~$3~ .~.R ~@~1§ sas+asxo ilnn wu-raamx ~.b' ~ 4}~t 55{Fa t, F53~b 3a a 7 ~ S ~ ~V I I I ~~ ~ ~~; 1 1\ ~---, III ~ r I -------~ I I j I ( f~ W€ E-+ ~ C~ ~ ~~ W~ 4 I 'I~ 1 ~~ ~ ~~ ul ~ Q ~\ Z ~ a_ \~ ~~ ~~ ~_~. -r 3~T __ _ ,~~~ 1 Y \ ~\i I ~ Ill\\``~y ~ `~ ~~ ~~_ '_- i_ 1B1an - _ _ ~ - ~- -~-~l:~,u ~. .' - ak i ~ ^ t ~h~ ~o~ ~ r J _ I I ~~ ~\~ ~ . ~~~_ ~ ~- = ~ ~, - '` ~d ~ ~ \ ~ ~-~ ,;; \ 1Q I®1 ~ OJ ~~ ~. zl j / /~ _J~slll~~'lc~r (-~ ~,° ~~~-~ o((x'~~ - I C ~ ___ __ ~~ ~ _ ~~;1 1 ~ S f II [`' n i ~~:~ ~ ~ I ~~I I\ ~~ a rl- P ~, I' Q a ~ ~ ~ >. o _ -~ Z• ~ I ~ € ~ 33 yy ~ 9 ~ i P ~gi ik Ea~~B {sa s e~ i e3f@ ~iE ~~i~~9i~~6 e e f ~ e ~• ~ + s~~a ~~ ~" Ra~~~~~e~e ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~r~~ 11 /~ ~I ~~ Q I I ,. _ I q / /H f S 1 ~n 1 g~ y~ ~ ~r~[!,~ ~ml A I fi tV ~ 1 i/ yl.~ -- ~ $ ~ ~ I~ /r ---I I /Fn/ 0.N 1I v rm t ~~ ~ n III T.~ `~ / ~ / ~ 7~ I`;. a I P N ~ ~/~H^; l/^at N F ~ \ _I ~~ \ t iIIS41 Il ivl \ T-~N ^ ~ ~ ~ \ \ II I ~ -----~ ; w u -__ u - ~ II > >~ da ~e a 6 w ~~ I` _ ~ ~ _ ~e_~~ CV m - g, n~ Zc a- 9 ~ .~ F `~ F - ~ eR i~ ~ _ ~ e / 4 - . ~~~ Ytl ~~ e~P 1a~~ 2i ~e - apt pFpl,~9 ~i4%~J~~ld~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ ~~~€~p~p~r~g~g~ ~ ~ ~ \ II p V 18tl15-OLSGI YHIµ~ y2~' 9L 2L ~~46 ~E f ( E ~ 1L ~ gg L qq ggV yy zz~isi.a ~w~s«uYrim it " ~ i ,.... ~ FAY ~~i~ Ff B€3a i ~ 1' i f lEl - 3 - N .b "q ^; _ t ~f t~~ 3 ~~ ill I - E ~~ ; _ ~ g~ , i ~E I } ~~ w @ E #~ z Ex ~ ~ ~ J ~ F 7~ J €~ ~ K ;~ O tla6 -- E~1 ~ I I ~ EE J LL ~~ _1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~E d I ;~~ ~ ~ W Ex ' w E9 z E~~ tli ~ - U ~~ ~ F -~ F O ~i~ ~ J Q ~ Z J • A & B-8 ~~~atb+~' ~? X 5' (r sNEO Roa AROVE vnNDOw SPANISH $1YLE COVCREi RlE ROOFlNC ROPE 5 12 --- i0P _ _ _ OPEN EAVE W/ - PAINIEO ROOF RAFTERS - SNCCO FlNISN -- iYP VYNIL FRANE WINDOW W/ SNCCO 7RIN AROUND ANO pECOflA71VE W000 SHUTTERS -~ D ~ANISN STYLE CONCflET NLE ROOFlNG FF W TOP_ _ _ _ _ i ~ OPEN EAVE W/ _ PAINTED ROOF RAFTERS I STUCCO FlNISN 2!' S0 STIXIE VENF"FA PILASTER (TYP) - OECORARVE / STOVE l£N~ _ ~GARALT PANEL DWfl NAIN ENTRY POOH J FlN141 W/ OPENEfl (TW Of 2) SCALE „~°"~~~'~ ~... ... ~~J ~~I~%IV s/16.1'-0' '~4~1 ii ~ -b I yl~l I II I I I Vc ~ ~ O ~ ~ _~ . s `A .1 . ti k ~ '~ ' ~ ~~ ~, ~ , ~ ~ ~ - 'R i ~l I - 1-,~ ~ 41 I' ~ l l I I I I I ~~ A&B-10 ~3 w J Q ~ U ~ .n m (~ \~ [-- 2 L~: _4 L S i- i' • 7 • • SHED ROOF ABObE WINDOW SPANISH SME CONCREi PLE ROOFlNO SLOPE 5 12 i0P _ _ _ OPEN EASE W/- - - - - - - ~ ~ - PAINIED ROOF RAFTERS _ ~ - ,. ~ ' 570000 FlNI$H f f '. ~ { ~ _ OECORANVE _ f 4AT INSET (1VP ) TYP VYNIL ERANE MNDOW W/ SNCCO iRIN AROJND - ~ /I ~ ~ / 8 f ~ _ ~ _ AND OECORAIIVE W000 SHUilERS ~ ' D SPANISH STYLE , QO FF CONCREi TILE ROpFlNC W i0P_ - . - _ - , I f OPEN EAVE W/ PAIN7Ep ROOF ftPFiERS ~~ ~~ SNCCO FIM41 ~ ® JI / ®® ~ m PILASiERS(iYP )~N- t f n n n n ~ ~-, DECOftA71~E / STOVE KNEED ~GARACE PAN0. DOOR MAIN ENTRY DOOR J RNISN _ W/ OPENER (i1P OF 2) / SG AIE =~/ i f....~~~J i~M~l_~~ 3/16'.1-0' ~ wp J a~~~ J ~ N pf Z ~l t- -~' EI f _~ t,1 i--\ !v 1 ~' c; wa <- ol ~ LL I '~ N IC` F ~~ i \ ~" ti. ~y I I ~ ~ I~ ~I ~ ~ f x ~ ii ~ _ ~i 'i !a ~ ~ I: ti ~ M M ~ k i; it ~ ~ i. •~, I. ~ ~ ~ ,, ;~ ~~ - • ®j~ ~ , ~„ ;; ~; .,, - ;~ ~a ~~ '~ ' 7 t~ ii ~' }-- d - ~, ° is _ ~ i' J ~- t( i ~: ~ A&B-12 • • • i ~- ~ . D G7 FF i0P -- ~ f f _, ~ ~ ~ - ~ y 8 db ~ ~ ~ - , ,, ,~ , . {~°, R, ---To SCALE ~!' ~. f ~ s ~.~-t,-~»~~;~~ cm~wra gun a+uro~o~ x~ 1 .r. r~nis - assal rtu 3E! t19p F ~ gt S A f ro. vsavm scao+. (1[f a573 t3 F SSf !3 S ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 - I 1 '' - r. m ~ii gg ~ .5 :~ ~ ~~ :i ~ ~ eE t ~ ~i~ea~ii ~~ ~~ I I ~ E~ -;_ ~ ALL" i I-' ', 3 C ;- I I ~ ~s - ~ I, ,, ;y. ,~;,~, t ~ - ~. - 6 ~ f t - ` ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ w/ y i ;% ~,~~, ~ i ~ ® ~ a g~g ~a [f tl[ `-~ ' a I I e , u. I I IJ .I I I ; ~ 1~ L I) L ~ ~ ~ 4 \) S n: Y ig :~ :i :i 8 ~I~ 7 II I I I ~ '~~ I I I II II I I I I ~ ~ I j II I I f O f ~ - Z_ y 1 ~ I 1 ~ I i II ~ L ' ~ 9 13 ~ ~ ~ 1 II ~ .ra I ,n I ,I I ' 3 `'' A & B-14 ~` C~ ~'I w 4 J J 'o N m o' II I I ' I I - ~~ I I , ~ III dm III , ` ~i (III _~ (IIII ~ , s.- IIIII 111111 - IIIIII 111111 I II I I ,i III ~ ~ IIII (IIII ~ ~ 111111 ~ ~ I~ 1111111 1111111 ~ ~ ~i IIIIIIII (IIIIIIII - IIIIIIIIII ~ ~ I IIIIIIIII I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ^. (IIIIIIIIIII - • IIIIIIIIIIII x V ~ ~ A IIIIIIIIIIIII . - ~ ~ ~ IIIIIIIIIIIIII ~ ~ IIIIIIIIIIIIII ~ , IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII (IIIIIIIIII ® ~ ~ ® ~ ~ IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII ~ ~ IIIIIIIIIII ~ k IIIIIIIIIII itlllllfllll IIIIIIIIIIIII _ , IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII ~ ~' ' IIIIIIIIIIII (IIIIIIIIIII ' (IIIIIIIIII - ' (IIIIIIIII (IIIIIIII flllllll ~ _ x IIIIIIII ~ ~ 1111111 111111 ~ ~ I III I ~ ` ~ ~ (III ~ , I I I II II I (} - IIIII ~ IIII II ~ I g;~ I I _.i I I I I1! °I ~I°i 3 . , -, t-- i1` (1 I A & B-15 ~~ ~ , I~ !r~ I W Q I J I Q U `~ s m fl Ll ~- !~) • iIS A & B-16 iOP- _ - f~~s A FF _-_ y iOP --- J -~ a ~ ~~ m _~ ~-_ `GARAGE PANES OOIXi W/ OPENER (PR OF 2) ----_--- Tov itP oecaRAn~E vrooo coRREEs FF 70P S G A L E _ 1 ~~~ ~~ ~,... ~ } ~ m _ I4 • y i Si®1IS19lNYJ AlLLY9UlN~ 6xi 1 .V. JAYS ,GLG91 YLl~yg~ 3'~ i( 1 EI/ ~ ~ ~ } ~ ~ 1 ; 6 :b : ~ al - I `II I :i I I I [E E ~ --; I ~ 4Q `(~ , r ~~ ~,' : ;r', , .Y .C.: ~ I r,. 0000 ~i pi; - ~! (.. 3 Sly aG E I I r c a o` I I ~ II I II i fli g J i 3~= i3iil,@i~ii 3 P 3E n~ L' - , ll RR i 11: ai alley lA l~ ill r1 ~ I- w 3 n~ v ;0 ~~ ~ ~i I I I : i fi ~~ I I I : 3 I :'~1 ~ I - -,r l,< t Y I "[ ,~~ ~ . ~: ,r ; ~.tc _ Y ' ~-° '' I " '-gy i !~ p - ;"::r tii ~ ~~ ' 1 5 :t~ ~ ~ ~ l ~ Y~ \e ~ + ~ ~ V I ~ ~ A, ~ ~r4 . j . I: 1.~~ W d ~ IIJ I ® ' J I I I I f I I I I I ~ 1 9- I n 9 .I O t A&B-18 • . DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 40 p m Emily Cameron May 2, 2006 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 -LILY KAUT - A request to subdivide 2 99 acres of land into 6 single-faintly lots in thq Low Residential Distract (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 6956 East Avenue -APN 0227-121-33 and 37 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2004-01198 -LILY ItAUT-The review of site plans and elevations for 6 single-family homes on 2 99 acres of land in the Low Residential Distract (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 6956 East Avenue -APN 0227-121-33 and 37 Desican Parameters The property is located on the west side of East Avenue south of Victoria Street The average lot size is 15,696 square feet (15,000 square feet required by the Etiwanda Speafic Plan) The 6 lots are located approximately 320 feet west of East Avenue A cul-de-sac will be a portion of the improvements that the developer is regwred to provide The property is vacant and abuts existing residential developments on all sides There is a Eucalyptus windrow, lust off-site west of the westerly tract boundary, that regwres speaal fence design to protect The developer has worked with the adjoining property owners on the north and west sides to provide similar fence materials The proposed fence material types are Cedarcrete on the west property line, and vinyl fenang on the northern property line The applicant is proposing 6 single-family homes, all proposed as two-story, however, all garage elements have been reduced to a separate 1-story element The applicant is also proposing a total of 4 floor plans Plan A and Plan B plus their reverse plans All homes have a useable front porch Four of the porches wrap around the side of the home The developer has revised the elevations several times to incorporate additional materials, including siding, rockwork, shutter detail, and pop-out window details to create movement on the sides of the homes The rear elevations include a breakfast nook which allows for movement as well Four of the six proposed homes have the regwred side-on garages, with 16-foot wide driveways, as required Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project 1 Indicate whether or not the two-story homes with the one-story garage meet the policy required by the City Council Staff believes this is consistent with the intent of the Councl policy direction of all two-story homes built at the minimum setbacks that give a cramped streetscene appearance The one-story garage element, one-story porches, and generous side yard setbacks are significant design elements that provide light, air, and open space, as well as enhance the streetscene 2 The rear elevations should be redesigned with greater articulation (horizontal movement of • wall planes) The 10-foot wide pop-out element is too small l ~x~ihik ~' A&B-19 DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTT16578 AND DRC2004-01198 -LILY KAUT May 2, 2006 '' Page 2 It, ~~ I Secondary Issues Once all of the mator issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues 1 Decorative property line walls shall be provided on' Lots 1 and 6, facing public view Materials should be similar to the surrounding properties (i a split face block with rock pilaters) 2 Front yard landscaping species shall be reviewed and approved prior the submittal of construction drawings Landscape palette should resemble the "Local Street Front Yard Palette" Figure 5-17 of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan Policy Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion 1 Construct block walls between homes (i e , albng interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fenang for permanence, durability, and design consistency 2 Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC 3 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry 4 Vary garage door design pattern from house to house Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the project be revised and return to Design ' Review Committee as a Consent Calendar item Design Review Committee Action Members Present McPhail, Stewart, Coleman Staff Planner Emdy Cameron The Committee recommended redesigning as follows Add cone-story plan to mix on two or three lots 2 Enhance elevations with more and stronger details, raise wainscot to the bottom of the 1st floor windows, and widen the 2nd story pop-outs The Committee showed the applicant renderings of two protects as examples 3 Extend rock/brick wainscoting to meet the bottom of the windows on all sides Window trim should match the elevation and style of the home A & B-20 ''4 CONSENT CALENDAR DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 00 p m Emily Cameron May 16, 2006 ~1 LJ • ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 -LILY KAUT - A request to subdivide 2 99 acres of land into 6single-family lots m the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelfmg units per acre), located at 6956 East Avenue -APN 0227-121-33 and 37 ' DESIGN REVIEW DRC2004-01198 -LILY ICAUT- The review of site plans and elevations for 6 single-family homes on 2 99 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 6956 East Avenue -APN 0227-121-33 and 37 PLANNER WILL GIVE ORAL PRESENTATION THE MEETING REVISED PLANS WILL BE AVAILABLE AT Attachment Design Review Committee Action Members Present McPhail, Stewart, Coleman Staff Planner Emdy Cameron The applicant presented revised elevations that addressed previous ~ Committee recommendations, however, all six lots have been pre-sold, and none of the buyers wanted a one-story home The Committee recommended approval of the protect with no one-story homes because this project is, in essence, custom homes A & B-21 Crty o/Rancho Cucamonga Planning Dmsron (909)477-2750 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM ' (Part I -Initial Study) (Please type or pant clearly using Ink Use the tab key to move Aom one I/ne to the' nest Ilne ) The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the- California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to:lmplement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this aaalication-be~provided in full. -' ~ ~ ,- ~- - ~ . INCOMPLETEAPPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that it Isthe responsibility o/the applicant to ensure that the appllcahon rs complete at the time o/submittal, Crty stall will not be evadable to peAorm wodr required to prowde missing Infomlation Appl~cat~on Number for the pro/ect to which this (orm peRalns Pro/ect Title ~f-~ J ~ /~V ~f ~ U ~i ~Lg DI /~ r7 I ~ ~n ~7 Name 8 Address of pro/ect owner(s) f l /Y >~/1 tA7 ,~ ~tf ~ ~ / G~ ~ /'S Contact Person & Address ~) ~ ~E ~S ~7R6 Iq~ ~T. ~ Zi.~ • A ~T~- LowrA C A ~ ~ 70 / _ , Name 8 Address of person prepanng this form (it different from above) r~ ~J C7h&~'~ Pag A & B-22 Created on 52212002 4 09 PM ~ ~ ~ Information indicated by an asterisk (•) is not required o/ nonoonstruchon CUP's unless otherwise requested by stall, •1) Provide a full scale (&1!1 x 11) copy o/the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) whrch includes the prolect site, and indicate the site boundaries rowde a set of color photographs that show representative views into,the site from the north, south, east and west, views into and /rom the site from the primary access points that serve the site, and representable views o/ signfcant features from the site Incude a map showing location o/each photograph p 3) Protect Location (describe) ~~~ D~ ~~ 1 KV~ ~(/ E N~ ~T~ o ` ,~ -' I S` C ~( D 4) Assessors Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet Jf necessary) 0 Z ~ / ~ ~ 2 ~ " J? / ~ ~ 37 •5) Gross Srte Area (adsq tt )' _/3~ , 3lv ¢ • •6) Net Srte Area (total sde size minus area of public streets 8 proposed dedications) ~ 3, 79'0 ~ 2 . ~ ~ ~ . 7) Describe any proposed general plan (attach addfional sheet if necessary) 2 . c-~ _ zone change whrch would effect the prolect site 8) Include a description o/all permits whrch will be necessary from the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the prolect 7>~~tt. SUt3 D It/l ~ ~ o l~ /T~2kCT Mit P i D~srG nr R~v~ E w ~. . 9) Descdbe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the prolect including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures Attach photographs of significant features described In addition, cite all souroes of information (i.e ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies) A' ho' rY Fly PD~E V~K-[N (NE W(L~ CONv~eT -rn pu rc8~ S 1"~~F t' L,~I~G sT-2vc7'vQ~Krsro~'~ ('30+ y~ a~~) ~' Gv~sT ~foy, Page 2 of 9 Created on 5/2212002 4 09 PM EnvironmentallnfoFonnl doc q & B_23 CG `) T//i~ 10J Descnbe the known cultural and/or h~stoncal aspects of the site Crte all sources o/m/ormabon (books, published reports and oral htstoryJ n U ~Tn ~a~ ~ t%°; ~! ~ ~rr~ ~ nr~-~ D~rG /~!~ ~ fr 7 i w~tilU~a 7yr~N S ~ T~ 11) Descnbe any noise sources and thenlevels that now affect the sde (aucraR, roadway Horse, etc.) and how they will affect proposed uses 12J Descnbe the proposed pro/ect m detail This should provide an adequate descnpt~on of the sde in terms o/ ultimate use that will rosult /rom the proposed pro/ect Indicate rt there are proposed phases for development the extent o/ development to occur with each phase, and the antiapated completion of each increment Attach addrt~onal sheet(s) d necessary ~LA-~ S e,4~1 BE S U~I VC lT / f-.!J• ~-I/~n~i f iiri r ~ S' ~l t~G r L-+E - T .4-N-t r~Y ~ ~.5 I D~r~t ~ ~ S (n/l ~-t- BF • EnvironmentallnfoForml doc Page 3 of 9 A & B-24 Created on S/zvzooz a o9 PM • u etc ) .In.~.i~ ~-A~T~ 7~ X!o/?7L-{~, W,cS7" ~Lc~'/1~,~NT/~C_ CA'~7 ~i~'~/7 ~~ ~~lC/~(~lCr~~ 13) Descnbe the surrounding properties, mcludmg information on plants a(td animals and any cultural, hfstoncal, a scenic aspects Indicate the type o/land use (res~dentfal, commerofal, etc ), Intensdy o/land use (one-tanuly, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, 14) Will the proposed pro/act change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the pro/ecf? 16) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term norse to be generated, mcludmg source end amount How wrll these norse levels affect ad/acent properties and on-site uses What methods of soundproofing are proposed9 ~~~~~?t~UCT~D>.l ~lv/S,E .4~" 501'1/.= RS~NT, ,,.i~G OOn./~O,T /~ f~///~% A101~L W~L~ l~ f KD~"1 WI I ~fSv CATI 6I•l ~' ~ /~,~ ttl,~ GL-~.~S- '16)^Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees 17) Indicate any bodes of water (mcludmg domestic water supplies) into which the sae drams. EnvironmentallnfoFonnl doc Page 4 of 9 A & B-25 Created on 5Y12r1002 4 09 PM • ® ~'~~ ~, 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A for usage e$GmatesJ For further clan(cahon, please contact the Cucamonga Coun~Jty~ Wafer D/ tnc~t a~t~987- X591 a ResrdenGal (gaUday) v"IJ 9 ~Pe k~ e gal/Day) 70~~ ~~b~ b CommeroraUlnd (gaUday/ac) NIA Peak use (gaUmm/ac) N 19) Indicate proposed method o/sewage disposal ^ Septic Tank Sewer if septic tanks are proposed, attach peroolahon tests If discharge to a sanitary sewage system rs proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clanficahon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Drstnct at 987-2591 ,ilU ~N~ j ~('~6' e Residential (gaUday) b CommeroraUlndustnal (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of resrdenGal units ~ I n etached (md~cate range of parcel saes, minimum lot sze, and maximum lot size ~J / loo ~ ~ ~ s. ~. A ached (md~cate whether units ere rental or /or sale unds)• ~ Sf1 ~~ 21) AnGcrpated range of sale pnces and/or rents Sale Pnce(s) $ ~ ZS~~oo to $ ~A l~ / DD Rent (per month) $~- to $ N /~ 22) Speafy number o/bedrooms by unit type ~ S C ~ • r~ L.J 23) Indicate anhapated household sae by unit type ~U/~ • A & B-26 EnvironmentallnfoForml doc Page 5 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing wdhm the pro/ect Contactythe appropnate School Distncts as shown in Attachment 8 a Elementary / 5~ ' b Junior High , c Senior High ~ , COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type of use(s) and ma/or funcGOn(s) of commercial, industnal or instrtuGonal uses 26) Total Boor area of commercial, industnal, or insGtuGonal uses by type 27) Indicate hours of opereGon 28) Number of employees Total Maximum Shdt Time of Maximum Shin 29) Provide breakdown oI anticipated/ob classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indlcaGon of the rate o/hire /or each classirrcabon (attach additional sheet d necessary) 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the Gty '31) For commercial and industnal uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be venfied through the South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct, at (818) 572-6283) Environmenfallnfofonnt doc A & B-27 Page 6 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM ALL PROJECTS 32J Have the water, sewer, Flre, and Flood control agencies serving the protect been contacted to determine their ability to • provide adequate service to the proposed prgect7 if so, please indicate their response YES 33J In the known history o/this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge ofhazardous and/or toxic matenals? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic matenals include, but are not limited to PCB's, redioecbve substances, pesticides and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and other Flammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage of any of the above Please list the matenals and descnbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, dknown ~~/l~~i 34) Will the proposed pro/act involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic • matenals, including but not limited to those examples fisted above9 If yes, provide an inventory of all such matenals to be used and proposed method o/disposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans adequatecevaluet on ofthis pro/ecttto the best ofmy ab I ty, that the tactsestatemients, and mtormebon presented arejfrue~d correct tot he best of my knowledge and belie/ l further understand that additional in/ormahon maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga / / /' Date ~ /1 Signature /~~ ~~/~ Trtle• ~~j^~ ,~~~~~ ` ~(~ ~t/~ 4l YLtC:U i t~~ A & B-28 Env~ronmentallnfoForml doc Page 7 of n Created on 5/2212002 4 09 PM ® ® t ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga County Water District February 2003) 'Water Usage ' Single-Family 705 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 256 gallons per EDU per day Neighborhood Commercial 1000 gaUday/unit (tenant) General Commercial 4082 gal/day/unit (tenant) Office Professional 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) Institutional/Government 6412 gal/day/unit (tenant) Industrial Park 1750 gal/day/unit (tenant) Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) . Sewer Flows Single-Family 270 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 190 gallons per EDU per day General Commercial 1900 gal/day/acre Office Professional 1900 gal/day/acre InstitutionaUGovernment Industrial Park 3000 gal/day/acre Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/acre Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/acre Source Cucamonga County Water Dlstnct Englneenng & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 • A & B-29 Page 8 of 9 Created on 5/30/2002 8 29 AM EnvironmentallnfoFormt doc ATTACHMENT B ' , Contact the school dlstnct for your area for amount and payment of school fees • Elementary School Districts Alta Loma ~ 9350 Base Llne Road, Swte F , Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-0766 , Central 10601 Church Street, Swte 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ' (909)989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 , (909)987-8942 4 Etiwanda 5959 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 ol h S . c o High Chaffey Hlgh School I ' 211 West 5th Street Ontano, CA 91762 (909)988-8511 • A & B-30 Page 9 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM EnvironmentallnfoFonnl doc ~ -~ ~ j 1 ~, ., ,~, t ,~ ~„ ,~ ~ ~, ~. I/ , ,,y, A & B-32 ~~ ~ r1 • C~ ~t C ~ v, ,luc(~ ,'~,~1 t~ A & B-33 • J 1,,.~ ;~~~;~~<<-r, z, , „ ~ Il~~~~ A & B-34 2c' _`~ ~ `;\ x h \\ ~,- tDINO \\ ~ c I` '~ ___ _ IL ____ _ _ i=_- -___ ._- ~900~ F ; \ 3[ 3f ~3E ii °SP:.-- Pd \kk J T-~'r Staeon /`~ v Oro III ^`\„' ~~ J I 2~ u J _~ I .;, ~ ' _4 it \I~ " I ~I 10' 1 ~ =''aoo I v I ~l .. __ _ vgp 1 ,~ ~ 22' '~®- \ _ -~PN iboo ~ - ~ . \ v7a ~s ~z- __ __~__ ~_®__ __ ___ _ __=a6~e= __ ~ i amwt Ave iE P F • . scn J ~~. "1 f ~ ti ti W O II x .3d f~ - G ~_J ~ _J ~ _ _ F 3 ' ~ 33 - I. 2. - a 1359 ~ ... E '' \ ~ n ~~ ~I 3[ i1 • Etlwanda \,, -__• 15 '~ al76aWmN ;, 3E~ - ~4-°0T30" ~L ~ - _ ~ sp FONTANA l Ml• - _____ n-ecowmc.~zonver, nesrorv m.mrvl.-ue. 117°3 e52 • 'rv e53pppn E 3 e51 2'30" '"r ~~ °~~'9ti ROAD CLASSIFICATION I MILE a , ` /~. -~ Se's Heavy duty / ~ \y ~ / (~ m49~ Light duty -__.__ veddlrt ~ V V - f Medmmduty =__ Unlmpro Interstate Route ~ U S Route O State Route • CALIF q & 8-35 CUCAMONGA PEAK, CALIF ~i`._ ,"LI_Pi?I^1T NE/40NTARIOISDUADRANCLE QUADFANGLE LOCATION / ~~4 = ~~, ~ , ~l`~T 34117-BS-TF-024 12 F{i J`.~~ ', iE^VQ ~<5l)1 Revlvons shown In purple and woodland complied) from _,, 0-l y J~ 1985 and other source dl la' 1966 PHOTOREVISED 1988 aerial photographs taken Partial check by U S Forest Service Map edited 1988 DMA 2452 11 NE-SERIES V895 _ . __._,. ....e~cmn of urban areas f F f^. i, i ~`'-~y j I City of Rancho Cucamonga • \ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORII~I ~::~; INITIAL STUDY PART II Y9 { t`-i BACKGROUND Project Fde: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 and Design Review DRC2004-01198 2. Related Fdes: n/a 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 - KAUT - A request to subdivide 2 99 acres of land into 6single-family lots in the Low Residential District (2.4 dwelling units per acre), Ibcated at 6956 East Avenue -APN 0227-121-33 and 37 Related File Design Review DRC2004-01198 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2004-01198 -LILY KAUT- The review of site plans and elevations for 6single-family homes on 2 99 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 6956 East Avenue -APN 0227-121-33 and 37 Related File Tentative Tract Map SU¢TT16578 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration 4. Protect Sponsor's Name and Address: Ldy Kaut 10630 Towne Center Drive #105 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5. General Plan Designation• Low Residential 6. Zoning. Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) 7 Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The property is surrounded by residential property to the north, west, and south To the east, there are two vacant properties, both zoned for single-family development, abutting East Avenue The subject property contains two non-histonc homes that will be demolished 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Emily Cameron (909)477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is regwred (e.g , permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None • • A & B-36 ,,), • • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC2004-01178 Page 2 GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVW D -Cucamonga Valley W ater Distriot EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District SW PPP -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," yPotentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages (x) Aesthetics (x) Agricultural Resoprces (x) Air Quality (x) Biological Resources (x) Cultural Resources (x) Geology & Sods ()Hazards & Waste Materials (x) Hydrology & Water Quality (x) Land Use 8 Planning (x) Mineral Resources (x) Noise ()Population & Housing ()Public Services ()Recreation ~ () TransportationlTraHic ()Utilities & Service Systems ()Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (x) I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the protect have been made by, or agreed to, by the protect proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared Prepared By ~ (~~'`- ~ ~ ~ YAK - Reviewed By / Date (-'~ 7 ~ - Date tL'/7 DO A & B-37 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC2004-001198 1 Page 3 Less T11an Sgrvficant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources PotenaallY Signhcant W,tl, A4bpa9on Tfian Sipruhwnt 'No I n Rico atetl I I act EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the protect , a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas () () () (~) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () ~ (~) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (~) quality of the site and its surroundings , d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (~) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttihie views in, the area Comments• a) There 2re no significant vistas within or adjacent to the prolect site The site is not within a view corridor according to General flan Exhibit III-15 b) The protect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The site is located on the west side of East Avenue, south of Victoria Street and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north, south, and west, with East Avenue to the east The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this prolect Design review is required prior to approval City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The prolect would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on sitd plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the prolect site The impact is not considered significant 2 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES Would the pro/ect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (~) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict wdh exsting zoning for agricultural use, or a O O O (~) Williamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (~) which, because of their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses C~ • A & B-38 ,,), C~ Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC2004-001198 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 i Less Then ~ Sipmticant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Infbrmation Sources sipnitioam Miapation Sipmtitant IJo I act Inca ratatl I act 1 acl Comments: , a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is located on the west side of East Avenue, south of Victoria Street and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north, south, and west, with East Avenue to the east There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed tc development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The mator concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and then economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) The site is located on the west side of East Avenue, south of Victoria Street and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north, south, and west, with East Avenue to the east The nearest agricultural use is more than 3 miles southwest of the protect site Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the protect a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (~) applicable air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute O (~) U ( ) substantially to an existing or protected air quality violation c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of O O U (~) any criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (~) () ( ) concentrations e) Create obtectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (~) number of people Comments: . a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding A & B-39 Initial Study for ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC~004-001198 . Page 5 Less Than Si9n'i~cant Lau Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially S~gnihcent With Mibpahon Than SignM1Canl No I act Inco tad I I atl Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR'was prepared and impacts evaluated b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be' generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer 1o a different site where the process begins again Therefore, th'e emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a protect-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air duality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • • A & B-40 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT76578 & DRC2004-001198 Page 6 Less than Sipnihcem Lev Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potanbally Sgnificant wan Mibpabon rh.a Siprvbwni No I acl Into te0 1 1 xY • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to, a schedule established by the Clty If slit is carved over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Duality Control Board [RWOCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PMip) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW~CB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMip emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not In use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon the Urban Emissions Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan Final Environmental Report (FEIR), Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), Reactive Organic Gases (ROG), and Fine Particulate Matter (PM~p) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant The General Plan FEIR identitied the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. A & B-41 ,~` Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC~004-001198 II Page 7 Less Than Signd¢am Lass ' Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially sign,litanl Wad MNgaoon TOen Sipnihcent ~ No I act Into rated I act I act After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase In emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect proposed Is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prg,pared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populatipns that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAOMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAOMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts~lf they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants Identified in SCAOMD Rule 1401 e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtectionable odors No adverse Impacts are anticipated 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (~) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U,S Fish and W ildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (~) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (~) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (~) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances O O O (~) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance A & B-42 ''4 r~ L n U Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC?004-001198 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 ~ Less Tfian ~ Sign,hcant Less Issues and Su ortin information Sources pp g Potentially Sigruhcant Wnh Miogaoon Tfian Significant IJo 1 ct Into ratetl I eh 1 act f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plats Comments: ' a) The prolect site is located in an area developed with residential uses The site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments According to the General Plan Exhibd IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the prolect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the prolect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The protect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the prolect will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on-site , As a result, prolect implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated e) Although there are numerous mature trees surrounding the prolect site, there are no , heritage trees actually on the prolect site, therefore, the proposed prolect is not in conflict with any local ordinance f) The prolect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES Would the prolect a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries Comments• • a) The prolect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact A & B-43 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC2004-001198 I Page 9 Less Tliart $ip,uhcant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Patenually 9pnmaam W~~ MmpaDOn IDen $ipruLCarn 'No I n moo tea I n i n b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the prolect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is knowh to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 511) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented , 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification Without an opportunity for the City to establish Its archaeological value. •' Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CE~A guidelines. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the prolect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age° and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The prolect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e plant or animal fossil) are encountered before or during grading, the developer shall retain a qualified paleontologist to conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures A & B-44 • L J U Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC2004-001198 Page 10 Less men sipmhcant Less Potentially WiN man Issues and Supporting Information Sources sipn~ncam Mibpebon apruncam NO I ad IMO rate0 I I Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should Immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (I.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit a summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. r~ U • d) The proposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The protect site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area No evidence is in place to suggest the protect site has been used for human burials The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050 5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site No adverse impacts are anticipated 6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the protect a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, intury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shakings U O O (/) uQ Seismic-related ground failure, including O O O (/) liquefaction iv) Landslides () () () (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () (/) () ( ) A & B-45 ''sy, Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC2004-001198 II Page 11 Lass man ' SipniM1Cant Lass ~ Issues and Su ortn Information Sources pp g Potenhally Sign,htant won Mnipaoon roan Srgnihwnt , No I an Inco tail I an 1 h c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () () (/) or that would become unstable as a result of ''the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive sod, as defined in Table O O O (/) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (/) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater C~ Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5 1 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hill Fault passes within 3 miles northwest df the site, and the Cucamonga Fautt Zone lies approximately 5 miles northerly of the site These faults are both capable of producing M„, 6 0 to 7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7 5 earthquakes is 12 miles easterly of the site and the San Andreas Fault, capable of producing • up to M„, S 2 earthquakes, is 14 miles easterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-signrficant ' b) The proposed protect will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils The Rancho Cucamonga area is subtect to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~g emissions, in accordance with SCA~MD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,p emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~g emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCADMD and RWQCB) shall be • applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~g emissions. A & B-413 • Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC2004-001198 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Less Than $IgnlFLanl hH3 Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Potentially Spruhrant vino Mibpahon Then S,pnticem t+o I ect Into atetl I ~ c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 51) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the agwfer The prolect would not withdraw water from the existing agwfer The sitA'is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Soil types on-site consist of Tulunga Loamy Sand association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial sod deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types on-site consist of Tulunga Loamy Sand association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 These soils are typically used for irrigated crops such as citrus and runoff is slow to very slow No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The prolect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed • 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the prolect a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (~) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a signrficant hazard to the public or the O O U (~) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (~) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (~) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a prolect located within an avport land use plan or, () () () (~) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the prolect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the prolect area f) For a prolect wdhin the vicinity of a private airstrip, O O U (`~) would the prolect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the prolect area g) Impair implementation of or physically intertere wdh an O O O (~) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (~) loss, injury or death involving wddland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ A & B-47 ''~~, Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC2004-001198 City of Rancho Cucamonga I, Page 13 Less roan ' Sipn,hcant Less ~ Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Fbtanbally Siprnficant With Mmpabon Than Si9n,fitant INo I ct Inco reteE I act I ad Comments: a) The prolect will not Involve the transport, use, ordisposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a countywide Interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state The City is In the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements The Clty has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The Clty participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City is In the process of developing, an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements The Clty has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant'impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are anticipated L~ c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the protect site The prolect site is located within 3/4 mile to the nearest existing or proposed school Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors No adverse Impacts are anticipated , d) The proposed prolect Is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site Inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact Is anticipated e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and Is not within 2 miles of a public airport The prolect site is located approximately 3 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact Is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact Is anticipated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, Includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Flre District In the event of a disaster Because the prolect includes at least two points of public street access and Is required to comply with all applicable Clty codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wlldland Intertace area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed prolect site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 • A & B-48 ''S • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC2004-001198 , Page 14 ' Less Than Sipmimant Less ' Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g amem~ellr Signihwm vino Miepation roan Sipmla am No I am Into rate0 I I an 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project, a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () (/) () ( ) regwrements~ b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () ' () () (/) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in agwfer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the' () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (/) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () (/) () ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (/) that would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, intury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp t) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (/) Comments a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) The protect is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial • activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWOCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits A & B-49 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16576 & DRC2004-001198 I Page 15 Less man , Sipmhcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially 5ignn¢am wren Miopation than $ipniheanl ' No I as Intro atetl I act 1 an Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment Prior to commencement of construction of a protect, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation Perform inspections of all BMPs u Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction protect discharges A construction protect for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit Construction protect proponents are required to prepare a SWPPP To comply with the NPDES, the construction contractor of the protect will be required to prepare a SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff The applicant will prepare a WQMP prior to submittal of construction drawings that identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage ' system after construction Runoff from driveways, roads, and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent Construction Achvdies 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall • include the following measures at a minimum• a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance A & B-50 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC2004-001198 Page 16 Lass man S,9^~hcam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Fotenaally Signd¢ant won Mm9abon roan S,9nr~eam No I act Inco tad 1 I program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed poor to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust In order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified In the Water Quality Management Plan shall be prepared prior to submittal of Building and Safety Division, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be . monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from ground water in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed prolect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor wdl it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will regwre the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing agwfer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surtace As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact; however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facddies c) The prolect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff because of the amount of new bwlding and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the prolect wail not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The prolect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Bulding Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the prolect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered signrficant . d) The prolect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff because of the amount of new bwlding and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the prolect will not alter the course of any stream or river A & t3-51 'Iti, Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT76578 & DRC2004-001198 II Page 17 Less Then ' Sivndv;ant Less ~ Issues and Su ortin In#ormation Sources pp g Potentially siv~i~cant With Mnipanon Than Sivnincant ~ INo I as Incro area I atl I ad All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated e) The prolect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The prolect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not 'result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated , f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspend9d solids in surface flows dunng a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality,impacts The site is for new development or significaht redevelopment, therefore, is required to comply with the NPDES to minimize water pollution The following mitigatign measures shall be implemented C~ 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP), including • a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall identify the structural and non- '. structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 2) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected h) The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to • General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected A & B-52 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC?r004-001198 I Page 18 I Lass Than 9gmficam Less I Issues and Supporting Information Sources Fotenually $IONfiCelll W,Ih McIQa00n Then 510NIICal11 l ,YD I act Inco rateE I act I act There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the protect site, therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City 9. 'LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project a) Physically divide an established community () () () (~) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (~) regulation of an agency with turisdictioh over the. protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specfic plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () () () (`~) or natural community conservation plan • Comments• a) The site is located on the west side of East Avenue, south of Victona Street and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north, south, and west, with two vacant properties to the east This protect will be of similar design and size to surrounding residential development to the north and south The protect will become a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated , b) The protect site land use designation is Low Residential in the Etiwanda Overlay District The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The protect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit lV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biclogical resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan • 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (~) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (~) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan A & B-53 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC2004-001198 ~ Page 19 Less Than , S,grvficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Paamiel~y Sigrvfcant wan Miagaaon Than &grvatam ~ No I en Irv:o taa ~ C ~ Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there ~s no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure I,V-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact 11. ,NOISE. Would the protect result in a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (/) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies ' b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (/) levels in the protect vicimty above levels existing without the protects ' d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () (/) () ( ) ambient noise levels in the protect wcinity above levels existing without the protect e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels f) For a protect within the vicinity of a prroate airstrip, () () () (/) would the protect expose people residing ar working in the protect area to excessive noise levels Comments. a) The protect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding the City standard of 60dBA between 10 00 p m and 7 00 a m ,and exceeding the City standard of 65dBA between 7 00 a m and 10 00 p m ,according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 because of traffic noise from the I-15 and I-210 Freeways 1) Pnor to issuance of grading and building permits, the applicant shall submit an acoustical study prepared by licensed acoustical engineer analyzing traffic noise impacts upon the project site and making recommendations for mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards. b) The uses associated with this type of protect normally do not induce ground borne vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated L~ CJ c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The • proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the protect A & B-54 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC2p04-001198 , Page 20 Less Tian ' Sigmhceni lass Issues and Supportng Information Sources PotaMially signiecanl With Mioganon Tftan Signlcant fSo , acl Inco rateE I act I d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) ind,cates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will enerate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to 9 mitigate the short-term noise impacts 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 1,7.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level momtonng as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Offictal. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Bµildmg Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately ngtify the Budding Official. If notse levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted . 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equpment, however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be required 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6 30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, If heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The site is located approximately 4 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated • A & B-55 'y. Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC~004-001198 Issues and Supporting Information Sources City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 Less roan Siprvi¢ant Lass WiN Tfian NLbgabon si9nficam No 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the pro/ect , a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (~) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of ewsUng housing, O U U (~) necessitating the construction of replacement housing ' elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people: necessitating O O O (~) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments• ' a) The prolect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area No impacts are anticipated b) The prolect site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c) The prolect site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the prolect result to substantial -~ adverse physical impacts assoaated with the provision of new or phystcally altered governmental facilities, need for new or phystcally altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, to order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance ob/ecttves for any of the public services , a) Fire protections O U O (~) b) Police protecUOn~ O O O (~) c) Schools () () () (~) d) Parks () () () (~) e) Other public facilities O O O (~) Comments. a) The site, located south of Victoria Avenue and west of East Avenue, would be served by a Fire Station 176 located on East Avenue approximately 1 2 mile from the prolect site The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the prolect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated b) Additional police protection is not regwred as the addition of the prolect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the prolect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled A & B-56 C~ C~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SU8TT16578 & DRC2004-001198 Page 22 • Less men $,pmhcent Lana Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potannelly S,QM,cem W,ih Mmgeaon Thin &pnhcem Na I n Inco 218E I ~ c) The Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School Distract serve the prolect area Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development A standard condition of approval "wdl requre the developer to pay the school impact fees With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Distracts are not considered significant The prolect will be regwred to pay school fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits No impacts are anticipated d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located 3/4 mile from the prolect site The prolect will not regwre the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new faalities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated • e) The proposed prolect will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing faalities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the prolected increase m library space under the General Plan will not meet the prolected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the prolected need of 15,500 square feet at bwld-out of the City, and is planned to open in August 2006 14. RECREATION. Would the pro/ect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (~) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the prolect include recreational facilities or () () () (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located 3/4 mile from the prolect site This prolect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A standard condition of approval will regwre the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated \J b) See a) response above A & B-57 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC?t004-001198 y Page 23 Lass Then S,gmhcant Less ' Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potenaalry siombcant won Mmgenon roan Sipruhcam , No 1 act Into rate0 I act I ad 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project , a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in () () () (~) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e , result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to '~ capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of O O O (~) service standard established by the county congestion managemen- agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, Including' O O O ('~) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards because of a design O O O (~) feature (e g ,sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (~) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity O O O (~) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (~) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments a) Implementation of the proposed protect will generate 58 vehicle trips daily The proposed protect includes the development of six single-family homes The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each single-family home will generate 9 75 trips daily As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in protect design The protect will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections The protect site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, the City has established a transportation development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No impacts are anticipated • n LJ b) The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each single-family home will generate 9 75 two-way peak hour trips daily, therefore, the total protect would generate an estimated 4 5 and 6 vehicle trips during am peak hour and pm peak hour, respectively In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local turisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement protects On May 18, 2005, the City of • Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact A & B-58 ,,) • Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC~004-001198 City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 24 i Lass Then ~ $,pndcant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant With M,bpabon Than SiynfiWnt INo I act Inca orated I act I Analysis reporting requirement This protect will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permits The protect Is In an area that Is mostly developed with all street Improvements existing The protect will not negatively Impact the level of service standards on adtacent arterials The protect will be required to provide street Improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No Impacts are anticipated • • c) Located approximately 4 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site Is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No Impacts are anticipated d) The protect Is in an area that Is mostly developed The protect will be required to provide street Improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The protect design does not Include any sharp curves or dangerous Intersections or farming uses The protect wlli, therefore, not create a substantial Increase In hazards because of a design feature No Impacts are anticipated e) The protect well be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an Inadequate emergency access No Impacts are anticipated f) The protect design has adequate parking In compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and well, therefore, not create an Inadequate parking capacity No Impacts are anticipated g) The protect design Includes, or the protect well be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would fhe protect a) Exceed wastewater treatment regwrements of the () () () (~) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result In the construction of new water or () () () (~) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Require or result m the construction of new storm O O O (~) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (~) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (~) provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that It has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments A & B-59 Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC~004-001198 City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 25 Less Than , Sipnlhtant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Polenoally significant wnn MN9aaon Tnan S,pmM1Cam ~No I ad In<o rateC I acY I t f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted O O O (~) capacity to accommodate the protect's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local ~ statutes and () () () (~) regulations related to solid waste Comments• ,a) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is required to meet the regwrements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency,at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontano, neither of which are at capacity The protect is regwred to meet the regwremenis of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Bwldmg Offiaat and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits The impact is not considered signrflcant d) The protect is served by the CVWD water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacty No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated • C~ A & B-60 Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16678 & DRC2004-001198 • • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 Lass man S1prubeaM Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially sipnihcam WM Mibpebon Tt,an sipnficna No I an Ir,co rated I 1 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the prolect have the potential to degrade"the () () () (~) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the prolect have impacts that are individually () () () (~) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a prolect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past prolects, the effects of other current prolects, and the effects of probable future prolects) c) Does the prolect have environmental effects that will () () () (~) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, edher directly or mdirectly~ Comments• a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site b) If the proposed prolect were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere of Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics, and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Pian Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use prolects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial . adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once A & B-61 Initial Study for ' ~ Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga page 27 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SU8TT16678 & DRC2004.Ot t78 cdnstructian actnrHies were completed. The Inidal Study identdi¢d potentially sign0lcant impaota associated with the exposure of people to Incr¢esed nose levels. Mrligetion measures contain0d H1 thre InRiel Study will ¢nSUre impacts are at 1e.45.1f1an-Significant I¢VaIS. BARUER ANALYSHS Earo¢r analys¢s may ba used where, pursuant to the tlenng, progrem EIR, or other CEt]A process, one or more effects have bean adsquatay analyzed In an earll¢r~Elre ourithMthe SCOpa of hand~adeq~ IY 15063(c)(2)(C) The effects Identifi¢d above for thu: pro}eo s~~~ ahd such 61Tec1S anayzed rn the following earlier dveument(s) pursuant to applicable legal were addressed by mttlpetion measures based on the earlier analysis The tolbHnn9 eaHrar analyses Cocarnoinga~Plann n9 O~Sron rottlcPSI1l05~ Civic Center m~e (check all Drat apply Clty of Rancho (x} General Plan FEIR (SCHtt2000081027, Cerbfred October 17, 2061) (x) Elnvanda Speafic Plan EIR (9CH yg2087801, certrlred JuN 6.19&3) AppWCAPfl' CERTIPIt;,AT1ON ' I cerdfy that I am the ePphcant for the pro}eat described in this Inmal Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mrtlgenon measures FuRh¢r, I have rovised the proleot plans er proposals andlor hereby agre¢ toSherp~~pao nron~mental etfecls would occurrhe effects or mdlgate the e4tects to a po1M where olearty no rgn ' Date: _ ~ ~,~ Q(p A~sllcanYS SlgrratUre. Print Name end 7ttle: A& B-62 C J C~ TO 39Fid LTZ0b86606 ET•bT 900Z/L0/90 City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 and Development Revew DRC2004-01198 Public Review Period Closes: July 12, 2006 Projei:t Name: Project Applicant: Lily Kaut Project Location (also see attached map): Located at 6956 East Avenue - APN: 0227-121-33 and 37. Project Description: A request to subdivide 2.99 acres of land into 6 single-family lots and the review of site plans and elevations for 6single-family homes in the Low Residential Distract (2-4 dwelling units per acre) FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is • proposing this Negatwe Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study indicates that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration dunng the review period. July 12 2006 Date of Determination Adopted By A & B-63 m w O .ti W a U a a 0 3 '9~~ ,;~u- - ~= :'~~; . _ u . ~=~:~-; ~ ~ ~~~ $` _ ~, r 1 rye. ~ ` u ~ ~ Sr ` w i? ~ a J "~ ~ y y . n r{a,.,~ ~ n~~ ~'~' .. ' 'Yi' ~+ x3t ~ ~ _ ~3_~ ~ = ~ ,~ y~!.~3i'iYy >"ty~ _ii, bn.. ~ ~ 3~= a ~ ~_~` -a _~ . w _F ~ r ~ ~. ~ ~ e 4~ v e ~ ..ee^^--S + •, ` ~G _ ~~ t R~~. 2'{,.'~ ~~"fi . ~__ ~~2 ` . e ~ ,Ri C ;~~ SS [ ' __ to ~ ~s ~•nz ,''rFr C% _-. ~ _vT .t.. r.q ~ l r ~ ~ t ~ `~~'„ {1 i _ _ ak :.~ ~ fir? A`~ .,n5 .. aC r~"a'-[Y ~"v .. _. . . . . . I ~ 0 N_ ~_ f • ~i ~, ~ U ~ a.~? U o C OQ ~ > ~?; °~ o U o o ~ ~ Q ~ • . • ~~~~ ~ A & B-64 10788 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 3 July 2006 ' Enuly Cameron, Associate Planner Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 RE: Planning Commission Agenda July 1'2, 206 development of 61ots west of East Ave, south of Victona Dear Ms. Cameron: ll~ir OF RANCHO CUCAMOAIGA ~U~ rJ ~ ~~ NECEIVED - P1.AtVNiNG • My wife Marsha and I hve immediately west of a housing tract that is on the Planning Commission agenda for July 12. It is a subdivision of six (6) lots, the western two of which are adJacent to our property. We are deeply concerned about the wisdom of placing two story houses on all of these lots, particularly the two that are adJacent to our property. We understand that the Design Review Committee expressed some concerns about the two story houses on the lots adjacent to our property. We'd like the Planning Commmssion to know our concerns as well. Our home is an histonc landmark of the City. It is a low structure, built of aver rock It blends with the soil and vineyards around it. When we added a garage (about 20 feet from the tract m question) we were careful to use the low profile, aver rock and other features consistent with the house. When we added on to the house, we were careful to comply with the requirements of the City's Historic Preservation Commission and again kept the structure low and consistent with the ongmal house. We received a City architectural award for this addition. • Building two story, big box houses adjacent to an historic landmark will spoil the environment for the apprec~at~on of rts history. Our home has been q & B-65 ~Xh~bi~ ~ included on some histonc home tours . One of the visitors wrote back to us and said that they appreciated our house the most because rt was m the best • preserved setting. ' The City has worked hard and invested energy and money to preserve its history. But preserving the landmark itself without being sensrtrve to the relationship between the landmark and adjacent development does great damage not only to the landmark but to the sense of history that can be felt around it. If you don't preserve the setting, you don't {'ally preserve the landmark. The City demonstrated its appreciation of this pnnciple when rt was reviewing the commercial development to the west of the Filippi Winery. After many meetings a plan evolved that was good for the winery and good for the developer. We hope the Planning Comrnission will apply these pnnciples to the project m question. Undoubtedly the developer will advance an economic argument. But please don't lose sight of the fact that we have an investment too. We have made a substantial investment m the preservation of history. We preserved a house many construction people told us to tear down. We reassembled the onginal • Hippard Ranch by purchasing three different parcels over time. We returned about 14 acres to its h~stonc vineyard and we plan to add more acreage to the vineyard. As long standing and outspoken cntics of high density development m Rancho Cucamonga, we have put our money where our mouths are. Our investment m preservation is on the land now. The developer is planning tq invest and planning to take a return on his or her investment There is nothing wrong with a developer making a profit, but we've been on the land and investing m it for 30 years and the developer profit should not come at our expense or at the expense of the histonc landmark. We plan to continue our histonc preservation as long as we can and one of our children would like to maintain "Hippard Ranch" as it is. In the thirty years we've been there, there have been four or five real estate booms that gave us the opportunity to "cash m" We elected to make the financial sacrifice and preserve history. Recent residential development m Rancho Cucamonga has resulted in a lot of big box houses eating up a lot of land. Some may find this appealing but A & B-66 • rt is not consistent with our neighborhood. The housing tract to the south of the proposed tract has a crux of one and two story houses but none of the two story are near our house and the houses nearest to us are depressed below our grade level If I recall correctly, the Planning Department required this configuration, for the very same reasons we ask the Planning Commission ~to require it now. North of the proposed tract there are few two story houses. Our neighborhood is not compatible with a forest of big box houses. The residents to the north recently petitioned the City to reduce the density (L to VL) m their neighborhood. The City agreed and made the change. , There need to be some single story houses in the group and it makes the best sense to put them on the larger lots so they can spread around a little more than the big boxes.' The two largest lots are those adjacent to our histonc landmark. There is a demand for single story homes. I've heard a number of people complain about the lack of new, single story homes. The tract currently under construction to the west of us has had no trouble selling its single story homes In fact, their sales staff informs us they have converted some • of their two story plans to one story. As the Baby Boomers age, more and more people will need single story homes Please adjust the developer's proposal. Please place only single story residences adjacent to the histonc landmark. Si cerely, , ~~J(~ C ames an s, r. ~ ~ Marsha ee anks A & B-67 3 I~1 U RESOLUTION NO 06-65 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578, ON 2 99 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED WEST OF EAST AVENUE AND SOUTH OF VICTORIA STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN 0227-121-33 AND 37 A Recitals ,1 Lily Kaut filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map 16578, as descnbed m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 12th day of July 2006, the Planing Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date 3 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on July 12, 2006, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows , a The application applies to property located on the west side of East Avenue, south of Victoria Street with a street frontage of approximately 330 feet and lot depth of 331 feet and is presently vacant land, and b The property to the north, south and west of the subject site are single-family homes The property to the east is vacant, and c The application contemplates the subdiwsion of land into 6 lots that meet or exceed the standards of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and . any applicable specific plans, and A ~& B-68 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-65 SUBTT 16578 -Lily Kaut July 12, 2006 , Page 2 b The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speafic plans, and The site is physically swtable for the type of development proposed; and d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable intury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems, end f The design of the tentative tract wdl not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith ali written and oral reports included for the environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission finds,that there is no substantial evidence thatthe protect wdl have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows , • a Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the protect Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, wdh the • imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the protect would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration b The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds (Q that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared incompliance with CEQA, and (u) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission furtherfinds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent tudgment and analysis of the Planning Commission Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration c The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitonng Program for the protect that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during protect implementation The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the protect d Pursuant to the requirements of California Fish and Game Code Section 711 4 and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 753 5, the Planning Commission finds, based on the Initial Study, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and considering the record as a whole, that there is no evidence before the City that the proposed protect will have the potential for an adverse • effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wtldlife depends Based on substantial evidence, the Planning Commission hereby makes a declaration rebutting the presumption of A & B-69 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-65 SUBTT 16578 -Lily Kaut July 12, 2006 • Page 3 ' adverse effect as setforth in California Department of Fish and Game Regulation 753 5 (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Code, Section 753 5 ) e The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mdigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which cbnstitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Those documents are available for public rewew in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750 4 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Deoartment 1) All perimeter walls facing public view shall be made of a decorative material 2) The applicant shall provide written permission from adtacent propdrty owners for any off-site grading prior to issuance of grading permits • Environmental Mttioation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that ail construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand orhigh-volume, low-pressure spray • 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 A & B-70 PLANNING COMMISSION SUBTT 16578 -Lily Kaut July 12, 2006 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO 06-65 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the follpwing provisions Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any oh-sde haul roads Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carved over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occur as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) m accordance with Rule 403 regwrements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWOCB]) datly to reduce PM,o emissions, m accordance wdh SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction-Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not m use 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping • • C~ A r3~ B-71 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-65 SUBTT 16578 -Lily Kaut July 12, 2006 • Page 5 Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer wdl retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activties, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wdl Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following • appropriate CEQA guidelines Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also prowde speafic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitonng)that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing activities Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has • completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find A & B-72 ''V PLANNING COMMISSION SUBTT 16578 - Ldy Kaut July 12, 2006 Page 6 RESOLUTION NO 06-65 Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i a ,San Bernardino County Museum) Submit a summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible r 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-sde Timing may vary depending upon the time~of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Budding Offiaal for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a mirnmum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize sod exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect wdl be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a speafied time frame • • • A & B-73 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-65 SUBTT 16578 -Lily Kaut July 12, 2006 , • Page 7 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed pnor to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site Post-Construction ActiwUes 5) The developer shall implement the MPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Madole 8 Associates, Inc dated December 10, 2004, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 6) Landscaping Plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pestiades/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be • submitted to the City for review and approval pnor to the issuance of Grading Permits 7) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 8) Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Nose 1) Prior to issuance of grading and building permits, the applicant shall . submit an acoustical study prepared by licensed acoustical engineer analyzing traffic noise impacts upon the protect site and making recommendations for mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards A & B-74 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-65 SUBTT 16578 - Ldy Kaut July 12, 2006 Page 8 f • 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 3) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at , the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Budding Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Budding Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensely to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 4) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible m first phase 5) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used • for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent ' feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF JULY 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST James R Troyer, Secretary I, James R Troyer, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning • Commission held on the 12th day of July 2006, by the following vote-to-wit A & B-75 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-65 SUBTT 16578 -Lily Kaut July 12, 2006 • Page 9 AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS C~ I-1 U A & B-76 S,V '' City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING ~ S ~~ PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 and DRC2004-01198 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the '(Mitigated Negative Declaration/Environmental Impact Report) for the above-listed protect This program has been prepared incompliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the fallowing elements 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures, are recorded with the action and the procedure necessaryto ensure compliance The mitigatior measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of /approval for the protect A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible gwdelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon • recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect. The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City m performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • A & B-77 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM SUBTT16578 AND DRC2004-01198 • July 12, 2006 Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the prolect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provde appropriate written approvals to the protect planner. 4. The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by, signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the speafic phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue regwring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unantiapated circumstances may arise regwring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The prolect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed bythe prolect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7 The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring afterwntten notification has been issued The prolect planner or responsible City department also has the • authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after prolect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to momtor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time 9 In those instances requiring long-term prolect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the prolect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitonng/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of bwlding permits A & B-78 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: Tentative Tract Maa SUBTT16578 and Develoument Review DRC2004-01198 Applicant: Lily Kaut D SN W V CD ....,.,.. ,.,,.,,y r~ctJalcY Uy. Gllllly liAfilerOrl. H ssoaaie mann er uate: May 31.2006 .. -. -. •. ~. Air Quality _ , All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all _ construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venficaLon Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the CPBO C Rewew of Plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to the City __ denoting the proposed schedule and protected equpment use Construction contractors shall provide -- __ evidence that low-emission mobile construction - equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect -- Contractors shall also conform to any construction _ measures imposed by the South Coast Au Quality - Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City -- Planning staff __ AfI paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of Plans A/C - 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of Plans A/C 2 noted ~n SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Rewew of Plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions -- • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of Plans A/C 2M through seeding and watering - - Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads BO _ C Rewew of Plans A/C 2/4 1 of 8 • • • • i • .. .. . . . .. . . .. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of Plans A/C Z4 areas to erosion over extended periods of Ume Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Revew of Plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices _ • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A q by the City if silt is carved over to adjacent public Construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling - Timingmay vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Construction Rule 403 regwrements _ ~ Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A q - ~ haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction ~ suitable means The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A/C 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Construction Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in - accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 _ Chemical sod-stabd¢ers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C Dunng A/C 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of Plans A/C 4 alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of Plans A/C Z4 construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equpment when not in use - - All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C Revew of Plans A 4- required to incorporate high-efficiencyAow-polluting - heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 2 of 8 .. . .. All residential and commercial structures shall be CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/3 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping - Cultural Resources If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities and to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CPBO C Review of A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification Report without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value - Consider establishing provisions to regwre CPBO C Review of A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new Report developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point _ - Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Review of A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage Report - • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Rewew of A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse prolect Report effects on significant, important, and unique - prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA - guidelines Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and Report proposed mitigation of resources within the prolect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent - archiving D W 00 1 3 of 8 • - ~ • ... - .. If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal fossil) CP B Review of A/D 4 are encountered before or during grading, the developer Report shall retain a qualified paleontologist to conduct a = preconstruction field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with Report minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing actrodies • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities Report elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage D If construction personnel make the discovery, the Q° grading contractor should immediately divert 0o construction and notify the monitor of the find w ro Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for CP D Review of D 3 documentation in the summary report and transfer to Report an appropriate depository (i e , San Bernardino County Museum) • Submit a summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. - Geologyand Sods - ~ ~ --~' ' ~:; -. - F - ~ ' ' - The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and Construction RW OCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible - 4of8 D R~ W ao w .. ... ' • -• .. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During q q schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o Construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil oft-site Timing may vary depending upon the 4me of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During q q speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions Construction from the site during such episodes Chemical soil-stabilizers ( d b approve y SCAOMD and BO/CE C During q RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction q areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to Construction - reduce PM,a emissions Hydrology and Water Quality Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall BO/CE C Review of Plans A/C be integrated into the design of the protect where During q appropriate Measures that may be used to minimize Construction -- runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, pre-cast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, -- _ diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pRs, and recharge _ basins Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant BO B/C/D Revew of Plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically __ __ identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during __ __ - constructionactivities entering the storm drain system to - the maximum extent practical 5 of 8 • • • .. ~ ... -. -• . .. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C Z4 the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identfies specific measures to control on- site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be _ included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be _ corrected through a remediation or restoration program - within a specified time frame Dunng construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there ' s rainfall or other runoff > - 7 wring construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 ~ :leaning will be performed prior to storm events and - ' ifter the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site - The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 the Water Quality Management Plan shall be prepared - prior to submittal of Building and Safety Division, to _ reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm - drain system to the maximum extent practical - Landscapmg plans shall include provisions for BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pestiades/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a - minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the Cityfor review and approval pnor to the issuance of grading permits - 6 of 8 D fp W v, ~ • . .. Prior to issuance of buldng permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including aprotect - - description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 _ Pnor to issuance of grading or paving permits, the CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage underthe National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be _ submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the _ NPDES General Construction Permit - j Noise ~ ~ - _ ~~-- • _ ., ' , - _ - ~ - Prior to issuance of grading and building permits, the CP/BO B Review of Plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit an acoustical study prepared by and during licensed acoustical engineer analyzing traffic noise inspection - impacts upon the protect site and making _ recommendations for mitigation measures to reduce - noise levels to below City standards Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A/C 2/4 hours of S 00 p m and 6 30 a m, on weekdays, Construction _ including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 7 of 8 • -. • ~ ~ ~ .. .. ~ . .. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A/C 2/4 standards specified in Development Code Section Construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The - developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify - the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A 4 as possible in the first phase Construction Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the CP C During A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, Construction _ including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a - national holiday Additionally, If heavy trucks used for - - I hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction sde), then the developer shall - prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass _ sensitive land uses or residential dwellings Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method o1 Verlilcatlon Sendlons CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B -Prior To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation - 8 of 8 ~„ ~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - DEPARTMENT t STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16578 SUBJECT: ~ SIX LOTS AND RESIDENTIAL HOMES APPLICANT: LIL LOCATION: EAST AVENUE/SOUTH OF VICTORIA ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Comolehon Date • A. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or m the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition B. Time Limits 1 This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning _/_/_ Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Etiwanda Specific Pfan 2 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bwlding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first • SC •1-05 ~ I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM~2006 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT16578: A & B-$7 doc Protect No SUBTT16678 Comolehon Date 3 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all • other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Speafic Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 4 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 5 $)reet names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance Hnth the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map D. Landscaping A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Muniapal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer •E. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director to the amount of ~yaa nn rnr~or to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertormance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds maybe used bythe Cityto retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit F. Other Agencies / / / I I / I I I / / / -/-/- The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/_/_ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permds APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) G. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following -/-/- • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM~2006 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT16678 A & B'$8 doc Protect Na SUBTT16578 Comolehon Date a Site/Plot Plan, ~, '~ b Foundation Plan, ~ • c Floor Plan, d Ceding and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and DRC #) clearly identified' SUBTPM# SUBTT # b N , , um er (i e , g Planning Department Pro/ect on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_I_ the City prior to permd issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/on walls _/-/- 5 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy'Efficiency Program (CEEP) can _I_I_ contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements H. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_~ marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2001-00001) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential protect or mayor addition, the applicant _/_l_ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract parcel map _/_/ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays I. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations _/_/_ 3 Roofing material shall be Installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions _/_/_ r~ U I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT1657£ A & B-89 Protect No SUBTT16578 Comolehon Date •J. Grading , 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be to substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to'~ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submttted at the time of application for grading plan check , 4 The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of bwlding permits 5 A'Separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer 6 If human remains are discovered on-site before or during grading, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Seaton 5097 98 and California Health and Safety Code Section 7050 5 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Corner property line cutoffs shall be d 2 Private drainage easements for cross noted on the final map 3 All existing easements lying within Tutu final map L. Street Improvements edicated per City Standards -lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or re rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service egwpment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Counal, except that in developments containing more than one bulding or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as regwred by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development r 1 U -/-/- I I I I / / / / / / / / / I I / / / / / I \PLANNING\PINAL\PLNGCOMMt2006 Res 8 Stf Rpt\SUBIT'16578: A & B-9O doc } y ~ Protect No SU6TT16578 Comolehon Date Construct the following perimeter street improvements Including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter A C Pvmt Side- walk Dnve ~Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other STREET "A" X X X X X X Improvement Plans and Construction a Street Improvement plans, Including street trees, street lights, and Intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the Ciry Engineer Security,shall be posted and an agreement executed to the sahsfachomof the Cdy Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the publlcand/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first , b Prior to any work being performed In public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the CIty Engineer's Office In addition to any other permits required c Pavement stnpin~; marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be Installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be Installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at Intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both Sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR; or any other locations approved by the CIty Engineer Notes ' 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at Intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be Installed on all corners of Intersections per CIty Standards or as directed by the CIty Engineer f Existing CIty roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times wdh adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the CIty Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to CIty Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per CIty Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program / / r 1 L J I I / / I I -/-/- •, / ~l -/-/- / / / / / / C~ I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpl\SUBTTI6 A & B-91 -1z doc Project No SUBTT16578 Comoleaon Date 6 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed • legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street Improvement plans shall include a Ilne item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer ~Mm Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Cry STREET "A" CERSIS CANADENSIS EASTERN ROSEBUD 5' 25'O C 15GAL Construction Notes [or s[ree[ i rees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2)' ' Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City Inspector 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineenng Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only M. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer ~. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adtacent areas O. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects • / / / / -/-/- / / / / / / / / I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT16578 A & 8-92 ley I ' Prgect No SUBTT16578 Completion Date P. General Requirements and Approvals I ~ 1 Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainll~le, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage T/_l~ Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit Issuance If no map Is tnvolved ' 2 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the Clty, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_/_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit Issuance if no map is involved 3 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall _/_/_ be paid for the Construction'and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit Is fully refundable rf at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation Is provided to the Cdy Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect , APPLICANT SHALL CONTACt THE FIRE SAFETY dEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED C~ r1 U I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT1657f A & B-93 ' ,,,,, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS Mazch 29, 2006 Kaut Tract (6) SFR West side of East Ave south of V~ctona SUBTT16578 & DRC2004-01198 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design gmdehnes for the spacing and location of fire hydrants ' a The maximum distance between fire hydrants m single-family residential protects is 500-feet. No portion of the extenor wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall'not exceed 200-feet b Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants aze • 1 At the entrance(s) to a commercial, mdustnal or residential protect from the public roadways 2 At intersections 3. On the nght side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As required by the Fue Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire Distnct ' 5. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any bu~ldmg FSC-2 Fire Flow The required fire flow for this project ~s 2,000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20- pounds per squaze inch This regwrement is made m accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project maybe used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire Dismct review and approval Pnvate fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow Firewater plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until Tirewater plans are approved. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire Distnct vehicle access and water supply from a public or pnvate water main system before construction ~C-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire Distnct "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee A & B-94 FCS-IS Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities Distnct #85-1 or #88-1 ~s required pnor to the issuance of grading or bu~ldmg permits Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions • PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: ' 1 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant'shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fue Distnct and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants w~thm a 600-foot radius of the project Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard #9-8 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivenng any combustible framing matenals to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Sernces must grant a cleazance before lumber is dropped 2 Coustruction Access The access roads must be paved m accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fue Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary util~t~es over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 3 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be recetved The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow mfonnation from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fue Construction Services PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the followiug: 1 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or dnveway m accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engmeenng Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Mazkers" On pnvate property, the mazkers shall be • installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. ' 2 Public Roadways: Pnor to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed m accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services 3 Address: Pnor to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be mtemally or externally rllummated dunng penods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry • A & B-95 • RESOLUTION NO 06-66 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO DRC2004-01198, THE DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO 16578, LOCATED WEST OF EAST AVENUE IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN 0227-121-33 AND 37 A Recitals 1 Lily Kaut filed an application for the Design Review of Tract No 16578, as described m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 12th day of July 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows • 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on July 12, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located on the west side of East Avenue, south of Victoria Street with a street frontage of approximately 330 feet and lot depth of 331 feet and is presently vacant land, and b The property to the north, south and west of the subject site are single-family homes The property to the east is vacant, and The application contemplates the construction of 6 single family homes, all ofwhich are 2-story, and d The application contemplates the use of rural architectural features which include siding, back veneer, and wrap around porches consistent with the design gwdelmes ofthe Etiwanda Specific Plan 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, • this Commission hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows a That the proposed project is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan, and A & B-96 ,~ i II PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-66 DRC 2004-01198/ Lily Kaut July 12, 2006 ~~ Page 2 • b That the propgsed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the distract in which the site is located, and , c That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and ' d That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially in~unous to properties or improvements in the vanity 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a Pursuant to the California Environmental QualityAct ("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the protect Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would b@ no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment • penod and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration b The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments recenred regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA, and (u) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission furtherfinds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration c The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the protect that has been prepared pursuant to the regwrements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures dunng protect implementation The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the protect d Pursuant to the requirements of California Fish and Game Code Section 711 4 and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 753 5, the Planning Commission finds, based on the Initial Study, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and considering the record as a whole, that there is no evidence before the City that the proposed protect will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends Based on substantial evidence, the Planning Commission hereby makes a declaration rebutting the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in California Department of Fish and Game Regulation 753 5 (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Code, Section 753 5) • A & B-97 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-66 DRC 2004-01198/ Lily Kaut July 12, 2006 Page 3 e The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and ali other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's deasion is based is the Plamm~g Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Those documents are available for public review in the Plamm~g Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750 4 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 abgve, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and u1 the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department , 1) All Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map 16578 shall apply 2) All perimeter walls facing public view shall be made of a decorative material 3) The applicant shall provide written permission from adtacent property owners for any off-site grading prior to issuance of grading permits • 4) Walis abutting the northerly and easterly property line shall be constructed of Cedarcrete and vinyl fencing respectively, with written approval from the ad~oming neighbors, for the purpose of eliminating footings to protect existing Eucalyptus windrows 5) All garage doors shall vary m architectural style to match the proposed homes Engineering Department 1) Street "A" shall be improved m accordance with City "Local Street" standards including curb and gutters, a c pavement, street lights, street trees, sidewalk, drive approaches, traffic signs and stnpmgs The cul-de-sac bulb shall be per Cary Std 111 The developer shall make a good faith effort to negotiate with owners ofAPN's 227-121-34 and 227-121-36 regarding privately maintained landscaping and irrigation along their sideyards on Street "A" Improvements are to be installed to the street curb Plans for these areas will be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division, with exception to street trees If the owners are not willing to negotiate said improvements, install rockscape • on the parkway, per City Standards • Provide drive approaches for existing "Not A Part" residences to Street "A" A & B-98 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-66 DRC 2004-01198/ Lily Kaut July 12, 2006 , Page 4 The developer may request reimbursement agreement to recover the amount for installation of permanent public improvements from future development as it occurs on either side of the street fronting APN's 227-121-34 and 227-121-36 If the developerfads to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by 'the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate 2) The developer shall make a good faith effort to negotiate with owners of APNs 227-121-34 and 227-121-36 an exchange of corner cutoffs dedications on East Avenue for sidewalks and curb returns on both corners • Remove or relocate existing power pole IoCated at the northwest corner of East Avenue and Street "A" 3) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electncal) on the project side of Street "A"shall be undergrounded from the first pole offsite most westerly on Street "A" to the first pole offsite Street "A" on East Avenue, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever comes first All services crossing Street "A" shall be undergrounded at the same time The developer may request reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted amount for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as rt occurs on either side of the street fronting APN 227-121-34 and 227- 121-36 If the developer fads to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate 4) Development within Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area 8 is required to install master plan storm drams and interim basins Intenm Basin No 5 and the storm drain in East Avenue were both constructed by Tract 15912, south of the subtect tract Tentative Tract 16578 can satisfy its condition to install storm drains through the payment of fees However, those fees do not cover the Intenm basin The developer of Tract 15912 is eligible to request reimbursement for the proportionate cost of the land and ultimate basin related facilities (outlet, etc) They must request said reimbursementwithinstx months of the public storm drain faalities being accepted by the City Therefore,this development will need to deposit $5,000 per gross acre in Tentative Tract 16578 with the City for the purpose of reimbursing the developer of Tract 15912 If reimbursement is not requested within six months of public improvement acceptance, the deposit will be returned to developer of Tentative Tract 16578 5) An in-lieu fee as reimbursement for the previously undergrounded overhead utilities (telecommunications and electncal, except the 66 KV electrical) on the opposite side of East Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of building permits The amount shall be one-half of • • A & B-99 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-66 DRC 2004-011 98/ Lily Kaut July 12, 2006 ~ • Page 5 the actual cost of undergrounding of said utilities fronting East Avenue 66-foot frontage The reimbursement fee is unavailable at this time since Tract 16189 is still under construction 6) Reimburse adtacent developers for oversiiing of interim drainage facihUes 7) The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) submitted with tentative map application has been reviewed and found to be substantially complete Include the Best Management Practices (BMP's) identified in the plan on grading plans when submitted for technical plan check 8) Prior to the issuance of bulding ,permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is,fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropnate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division when the first Building Permit application is submitted to Budding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect 9) Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated cost of operating all street lights during the first six months of operation, prior to building permit issuance or approval of the final map, whichever occurs first 10) A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropnate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of budding permits, whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer Environmental Mdiaation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide • evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction A & B-100 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-66 DRC 2004-01198/ Ldy Kaut July 12, 2006 Page 6 measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and goatings shall be applied either by hand orhigh-volume, low-pressure'spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time • • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried aver to adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Suspend grading operations during high words (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric orclean alternative fuel • powered equipment where feasible A & 8-101 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-66 DRC 2004-01198/ Lily Kaut July 12, 2006 • Page 7 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction-Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use 10) All residential and commercal structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be requred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to momtor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer wdl retain a qualified paleontologist to momtor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide . specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures A & B-102 ~q, PLANNING COMMISSION DRC 2004-01198/ Lily Kaut July 12, 2006 Page 8 RESOLUTION NO 06-66 Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activties Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the sumfnary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i a ,San Bernardino County Museum) Submit a summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Budding Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) speafically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical ~J • A & B-103 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-66 DRC 2004-01198/ Lily Kaut ' July 12, 2006 • Page 9 , 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies speafic measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specrfy the timing of grading and construction to minimize sdil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which,does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 3) During construction, temporary bgrms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site, when there is rainfall or other runoff , 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning wdl be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site Post Construction Operational • 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified ~n the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Madole & Associates, Inc dated December 10, 2004, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 6) Landscaping Plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for rewew and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits 7) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 8) Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, applicant shall obtain a • Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of A & B-104 PLANNING COMMISSION DRC 2004-01198/ Lily Kaut July 12, 2006 Page 10 RESOLUTION NO 06-66 the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise 1) Prior to issuance of grading and building permits, the applicant shall submit an acoustical study prepared by licensed acoustical engineer analyzing traffic noise impacts upon the protect site and making recommendations for mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 3) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Bwlding Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Bwlding Offical within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Offical If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 4) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase 5) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavytrucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily taps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF JULY 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman • • • A & B-105 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-66 DRC 2004-01198/ Lily Kaut July 12, 2006 • Page 11 ATTEST , James R Troyer, Secretary I, James R Troyer, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Pdannmg Commission held on the 12th day of July 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • ~ & B-106 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING ~ PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 and DRC2004-01198 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identfied in the '(Mitigated Negatroe Declaration/Enwronmental Impact Report for the above-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessaryto ensure compliance. The mitigat~orl measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to Whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible gwdelines. As monitoring • progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect. The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City m performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance wtll be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department hawng the original authority for processing the protect. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • A & B-107 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM SUBTT16578 AND DRC2004-01198 • July 12, 2006 Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mrtlgaUOn activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the,protect planner. 4. The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Fomt. Attar each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5 as omelet d by the pro act plannerortrespons blerCity departhment at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6 Unantiapated arcumstnces may arise regwnng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed bythe protect planner or responsible Citydepartment and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng after written • notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8 responsnbility of theltCity1of Rancho Cucamonga PlanningeDivis on t The Divas on shall) equhe the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time. 9. In those instances regwring long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mtigation measure has been implemented. The monitonng/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of bwlding permits • A i~ B-108 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) D R~ W 0 Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 and Development Review DRC2004-01198 Applicant: Lily Kaut Initial Stud Pre ared b Em'I C A - y p y. f v ameron, ssocfate Plann er Date: Mav 31.2006 . • ~. .. ~ ~ Air Quah y '~ ~ Ica aas ,~-n~ ti a",; ' ~ & t ~ - ~ ~~ - , - •-- .. ,~~ . , y~, ;"M°~''~"g~',~"~.'~ a N e ~., ~rl G ~MTr t ti.. t..a .. -~4- i.`. ~ ~ ,~ ~~~° ,bS±, . / i'~ ,~+. ~ ~l ("k., •.~ rt lS~d a. ~ ,~ ~ „ ,w,w• ~ 7 x1 c t y;9-{~K.M1~~ ` q Y ?~ 4 ra'!'t~'~:': 1.~ ..; .'.'~,k~ ~;, ~, F~- .k /'.~.`.~~. :ef :';", ,r~~l~M`^ uarx ! N ~ ~ ~ ~~'~ `' ~ ~y~n~rwf- ,1!"?p~~,~-.~ r ~ , v,; `°',t,`„ ~ _ All construction equpment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of Plans A/C operating condition so as to reduce operational 2/4 emissions The contractor shall ensure that all - construction equipment is being properly serviced and - maintained as per manufacturers' speafications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for Cdy venhcation Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the CP/BO C Review of Plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected _ egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide _ _ - evidence that low-emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was - - - inveshgated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality - Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City - Planning staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of Plans A/C - 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Rewew of Plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 _ All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Adddionally, contractors shall include the following provisions - - • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Rewew of Plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering - • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads BO _ C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 • :f8 u • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibddy of large BO C Review of Plans A/C Z4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material m BO C Review of Plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices - • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public Construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling - Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of _ consuucnon • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Construction Rule 403 requirements > _ o Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods BO C During A 4 ~ haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction swtable means ~ The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During ~ AIC 4 sod-stabd¢mg agent (approved by SCAOMD and Construction _ Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) daily - to reduce Fme Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, m accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403. - _ Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A/C - 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of Plans A/C 4 alternatrvefuej-powered egwpment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of Plans A/C y4 construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not muse. - - - All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C Review of Plans A ¢ regwred to incorporate high-effiaencyAow-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters - s c 2of8 All residential and commeraal structures shall be CP regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Cultural Resources `~- ~""' - ':,r-'~-="~", ax,;~'~;°~: If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer wdl retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction actwities and to take appropriate measures to protector preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wdl • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CP/BO sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value D R~ W 1 1 1 Consider establishing provisions to require CPBO incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using then special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the area's CPBO archaeological heritage Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines Prepare a technical resources management report, CP documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, wdh original illustrations to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archroing. C ~ Review of Plans ~ A/C 2/3 ~~ / C Review of A/D 3/4 Report C Review of A/D 3/4 Report C Review of - A/D 3/4 Report - C Review of A/D 3/4 Report - C I Report of I A/D I 13/4 • ~f 8 I. • .. ... -. -• .. If any paleontological resource (~ a plant or animal fossil) CP B Review of AID 4 are encountered before or during grading, the developer Report shall retain a qualified paleontologist to conduct a = preconstruction field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specdic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures _ • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Revew of A/D 4 egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with Report minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activties. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities Report D elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. Qo If construction personnel make the discovery, the _ pp grading contractor should immediately divert - - construction and notify the monitor of the find v Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for CP D Review of - D 3 documentation in the summary report and transfer to Report an appropriate depository (i e , San Bernardino County Museum) ^ Submit a summary report to City of Rancho - Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a _ copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. - 'Gtiolcgy'ai~s~9~ Is . , , ~. ~ -o- ;,,•., The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and - Construction RW OCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, m accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible - - - 4 of 8 D f2o W J w • .. ~ ~ . . ., .. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C Dunng q q schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o Construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod - off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C Dunng A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions Construction from the site during such episodes Chemical soil-stabili e z rs (approved by SCAOMD and BO/CE C Du RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction nng A q areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to Construction reduce PM,o emissions. ' H drologyand Water tY ~ .,,- ,•r - ,.s~, ~ ~~:.~4"rt ~" ~s :.~' '~';~:-":t;',~, ~.~^~t,. E~ ~i~ ;~ ~i ~• ;;%,;~<ti;`~r ~'. f=`,`;.,~ • Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall BO/CE ~ C . r be integrated into the design of the protect where Review of Plans During A/C 4 appropriate Measures that may be used to minimize Construction runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drams, _ pre-cast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, _- ~- diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pds, and recharge - basms - - Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permd applicant BO B/C/D Revew of Plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically ~ - _ identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that _ shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during -- construction activities entering the storm drain system to _ - the maximum extent practical • - ~f 8 • ~ • - • . .. trot Plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 m, and implemented for the proposed itifies specific measures to control on- erosionfrom the time ground disturbing utiated through completion of grading :ontrol Plan shall include the following i minimum a) Specrfy the timing of __ _. _ nstruction to mirnmrze sod exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern Califorrna, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be - included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be _ corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame During construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C Z4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff _ During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Rewew of Plans A/C 2/4 cleaning will be pertormed pnor to storm events and = _ after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site = The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C - Z4 the Water Quality Management Plan shall be prepared _ pnor to submittal of Building and Safety Division, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm = drain system to the maximum extent practical - - Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pestiades/herbiades Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a _ minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval pnor to the issuance of grading _ _ permits D Ro 6of8 D fp tp s .. , .. uts, the applicant shall approval of a W ater CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 IP), including a protect - _- -Management Practices _ (BMPs) that wdl be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent wdh the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted b y the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 _ Prior to issuance of radin g g or paving permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C yq Intent (NOI) to comply wdh obtaining coverage underthe National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit - - lvols"e ~~ ~~ y ... h~d~)' ti¢N~ d . .A a n~ - .. I~ ~C ~~t ~. d~}'T".~i.~gyp yl#i~5}t; °,° . F Pnor to issuance of grading and budding permits, the CPBO B Review of Plans A/C -n .. 2/4 applicant shall submit an acoustical study prepared by and dunng licensed acoustical engineer analyzing traffic noise inspection impacts upon the protect sde and making - recommendations for mitigation measures to reduce - noise levels to below City standards Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C Dunng A/C 2/4 hours of 8 00 p.m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, Construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 7 of 8 • - C~ .. ~ ... -. . .. shall not exceed the BO C During A/C 2/4 ant Code Section pro ert line Th Construction p y e - to pertorm weekly -••••, ,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,mod in Development Code Section 17.02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Budding Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify = the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced = in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The perimeter block wall h ll b s a e constructed as early CP C D as possible in the first phase uring A 4 Construction Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the CP C hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a.m on weekdays, During Construction A 4 - including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a = national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for _ - hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to _ and from the construction site), then the developer shall - prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings _ D W 1 rn Key to Checklist Abbreviations R86 Onsible~Fars nl, y- iq'*°!i1i~f ? ~° ~.-:,~, .. a p o -,. ,~-5 ;_~~, f:i;~ ~~- r - 13:;v °~': a'rilfodpgPFr~ti~fio~r,,. •r,~a r ;tiltatll ~ ri i~d(G;~`t~eit}IoAU01i~,~R~ri~" !.'^'•k,:'lA~t• • ;~s ;Sanctions ~ •„ - CDD -Community Development Director or designee A - Wrth Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Pnor To Construgion B -Other Agency Pennrt /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Oxupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO • Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds FC • Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation 8of8 ~~~~'~~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ' DEPARTMENT ., STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DESIGN REVIEW DRC2004-01198 SUBJECT: SIX LOTS AND RESIDENTIAL HOMES APPLICANT: LILY LOCATION: EAST AVENUE/SOUTH OF VICTORIA ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS• A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 06-66, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not regwred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Speafic Plan SC-1-05 Completion Date / / • -/-/_ -/-/- -/-/- • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM12006 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2004- A & B-1 ~ 7 is I\ 1 Protect No DRC2004-01198 Comolelion Date 2 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and • State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Bullding and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 3 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval pnor to the issuance of budding permds 4 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement' plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading', tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 5 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all' other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the bme of bwldmg permd issuance 6 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 7 Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 8 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination ' 9 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the pro/ect perimeter If a double wall • condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adtoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the protect's perimeter 10 Construct block walls between homes (i a ,along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency 11 Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC 12 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry 13 For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two'/-inch lag bolts, to withstand high winds Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade 14 On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk The 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property LJ / / / / I / / / / / / / / / / / / / / I / / / / I / I \PLANNINGIFINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2004-01 A & B-118 h ~ Protect No DRC2004-01198 Comoletion Date D. Building Design All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and Increased delineation of surfade treatment subtect to Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits All roof appurtenances, Including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or~ protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adtacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director Details shall be included In building plans E. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping In the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the Issuance of building permits or prior final map approval In the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Existing trees required to be preserved In place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110; and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved In place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods 3 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and Irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each Individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an Inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are In satisfactory condition 4 Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and Irrigation shall be required per the Development Code and/or Etiwanda Specific Plan This requirement shall be In addition to the required street trees and scope planting 5 Landscaping and Irrigation systems required to be Installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously mamtained by the developer 6 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department F. Environmental Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant Is responsible for the cost of Implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director In the amount of R a45> nn nrior to the Issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds maybe used by the Clty to retain consultants and/or pay for Clty staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit -/-/~ / / / / -/-/- -/-/- -/-/-• / / / 1 / / • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res 8 Stf Rpt\DRC2004-i A & B-119 S Protect No DRC2004-01198 Comolehon Date G. Other Agencies ~, '~ • 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be sub)ect to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909-477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS NOTE' ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) H. General Requirements Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electncal Plans (2 sets, detached) including the s¢e of the main switch, number and s¢e of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, waterandwaste • diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Protect Number (i e , SUBTT #, SUBTPM#, DRC #) clearly Identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit lwo sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect'slEngineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City pnor to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls 5 Developers wishing to participate In the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements Site Development Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2004-01198) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to Issuance of building permits for a new resldentlal protect or mayor addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may Include, but are not Limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and • Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School 4 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2004-C A & B-~ 20 - /_/_ i / / / / / / / / / / / / / / Protect No DRC2004-01198 Completion Date Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Bullding and Safety Department prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map• _/_/~ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays J., New Structures , 1 Provide compliance with the California Bullding Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Binding Code for required occupancy separations _/_/_ 3 Rgofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions _/_/_ K. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be In accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _I_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/ / time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading plan, appropriate certlfcations and compaction reports shall be completed, _I_/~ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of bwlding permds 5 A separate grading plan check submittal Is required for all new construction protects and for _/_/_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer 6 If human remains are discovered on-site before or during grading, no further disturbance shall _/_/_ , occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 and California Health and Safety Code Section 7050 5 L. Additional Requirements/Comments 1 -/-/- APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards _/-/- 2 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or _/_/_ noted on the final map • t I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM12006 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2004-01a & B-1Q~ 12 doc y Protect No DRC2004-01198 Comolehon Date 3 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map ' •N. Street Improvements ' All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated~by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of thbse buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter A C Pvmt Side• walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Street"A" X X X X X X 4 Improvement Plans and Construction • a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction pro/ect along ma/or or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer • / / / / -~-~- / I / / / / / / / / / / I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC200a-01 A ~& B_1'ZQ c )' Protect No DRC2004-01198 Completion Date Existing Clty roads requiring construction shall remain open~to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are requiredi A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to Clty Standards, except for single family residential lots Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check ' Provide a minimum of 3-inch conduit for future fiber optic use on all streets with connection through the parkway to each lot or parcel (fiber-to-the curb, FTTC) The size, placement, and location of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subtect to City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits or final map approval„ whichever comes first Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street Improvement plans Street Improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required,~tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Mm ' Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Oty STREET "A" CERSIS CANADENSIS EASTERN ROSEBUD 5' 25' O C 15ga1 Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted In accordance with Clty standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the Clty inspector Any unusual toxicdies or nutrient defiaenaes may require backfill sod amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only O. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of budding permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer P. Drainage and Flood Control A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be Installed as required by the City Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adtacent areas / / , • I / / / / / / • / / / / / / • I \PLANNING\FINALIPLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2004-011 A & B 123 i°` ,\ Protect No DRC2004-01198 Completion Date Q. Utilities ~ ' • 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV~ (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed antl constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days,prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects R. ' General Requirements and Approvals 1 Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior ko building permit issuance if no map is mvolved 2 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved 3 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversidn Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from • landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineerng Department when the first building permd application is submitted to Budding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition pro/ect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED C~ -/-/- -/-/- / / -/-/- / / / / I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2004-C A & B-124 ,,4 ~,,,,,~ . Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Fire Construction Services ' ~ • it STANDARD CONDITIONS . March 29, 2006 Kaut Tract (6) SFR West side of East Ave south of Victona SIJBTT16578 & DRC2004-01198 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides desigri gu~dehnes for the spacing and location of fire hydrants. a The maxunum distance between fire hydrants m single-family residential projects is 500-feet. No portion of the extenbr wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shalT.not exceed 200-feet. b. Fue hydrants aze to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are 1 At the entrance(s) to a commercial, mdustnal or residential project from the public roadways 2 At intersections 3. On the nght side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4. As required by the Fire Safety Droision to meet operational needs of the Fire Distract. 5. A rmmmum of forty-feet (40') from any building FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The required fire flow for this project is 2,000 gallons per minute at a muumum residual pressure of 20- pounds per squaze inch. This requirement is made m accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire D~stnct Ordinances 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project maybe used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire Distract review and approval. Pnvate fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow 3 Firewater plans aze required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 4 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located w~ttun 600-feet of the proposed project site. FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire Distract vehicle access and water supply from a public or pnvate water main system before construction FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire Distract "Apphcat~on for Altemate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee • • A & B-125 '17 I 1 FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the pazcel map into the Community Facilities D~stnct #85-1 or #88-1 is required pnor to the issuance of grading or building peipitts • C11pOIIOjOg1Ca1 SIIIlIII1ai'y OI KC.1+YL JLaIIpilru t,uLw~ivu~ PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The appltcant~~shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Ftre Distnct and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standazd #9-8 , All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivenng any combustible framing matenals to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Ftre Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2 Construction Access• The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities, over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 3. Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow mfonnation from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers. All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway m accordance with the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga Engineenng Standazd Plan 134, Installation of Reflective Hydrant Mazkers" On pnvate property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. i 2 Public Roadways: Pnor to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed m accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. 3 Address: Pnor to the granting of occupancy, single-faintly dwellings shall post the address with minunum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during penods of dazkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. C~ A & B-126 Staff Report , DATE July 12, 2006 TO' Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director gy Tabe van der Zwaag, Assistant Planner SUBJECT NEBS OME DEVELOPMENTnEA requeDst to subdTv de 0 92 acre of~land intoT4 ots m t e Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling yrnts per acre), located 100 feet north of Vivero Street, on the east side of Carnelian Street, at the terminus of Candlewood Avenue - APN 0207-551-73 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental . impacts for consideration VARIANCE DRC2005-01078 -NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT - A request to reduce the required average lot area of 8,000 square feet to 7,903 square feet fora 4 lot subdivision on 0 92 acre of land in the Low Residential Distnct (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located 100 feet north of Vivero Street, on the east side of Carnelian Street -APN 0207-551-73 VARIANCE DRC2006-00477 -NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT - A request to increase the permitted wall height along the west property line of a 4 lot subdivision by a maximum 3 feet in order to attenuate traffic noise from Carnelian Street in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located 100 feet north of Vivero Street, on the east side of Carnelian Street -APN 0207-551-73 VARIANCE DRC2006-00519 -NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT - A request to decrease the 40-foot minimum property line lot width regwrement by 20 feet for 1 lot of a 4 lot subdivision on 0 92 acre of land in the Low Residential Distnct (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located 100 feet north of Vwero Street, on the east side of Carnelian Street -APN 0207-551-73 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Density 4 dwelling units per acre B Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Single-family homes, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) • South - Single-family homes, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Single-family homes, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Single-family homes, Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) ITEM C,D,E & F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM17222, DRC2005-01078, DRC2006-00477 AND DRC2006-00519 • NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT July 12, 2006 Page 2 C General Plan Designations Protect Site - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) D Site Characteristics The project site is located 100 feet north of Vivero Street, between the ' terminus of Candlewood Avenue and Carnelian Street on a parcel of 0 92 acre of land The parcel of 9 94 feelt from north-toasouthlthAll of the Isureroundmg p otpert esearerdeveloped wdhtsingle fain ly residences The existing topography slopes from about 1,388 feet at the north property line to about 1,379 feet at the south property line ANALYSIS A General The applicant proposes subdividing the existing lot into 4 lots for future development of one single-family residence per lot The existing lot is currently developed with asingle-family residence that takes access from Carnelian Street The existing residence will be demolished pnor • to final map approval The new lots will take access from the proposed extension off Candlewood Avenue, which currently terminates at the east property line of the site Because of the short length sf ahflagulotdeThe ottsizels of the proposeddlots are as fotllows s Lot 17,884 square feet9Lot 2-7,375 square feet, Lot 3-8,888 square feet, and Lot 4-7,465 square feet No homes are proposed at this time B Variance The proposed parcel map and the parcels created comply with the City's requirements for lot width, depth and minimum lot area that are applicable in the Low Residential Distract, however, requires variances in several areas 1) The average lot area for the 4 lots, though, is 97 square feet less than the City's 8,000 square foot average lot area requirement, 2) Lot frontage additonal ~Va ancetsroalsor~equested inrorder town cease wal heght alongtCa~neleanaSteet m order to reduce traffic noise per City standards C Tree Removal Permit The applicant has submitted a Tree Removal Permit requesting permission to remove trees on the site The included Arborist Report states that only a group of nine Italian cypress trees are worthy of preservation These trees, though, are m conflict with the proposed location of the cul-de-sac extension of Candlewood Avenue D maximum 2 feet forha comlbcnation reta nmg/freestanding wallstl located a ong portions) ofethetnoRh and south property lines AVERAGE LOT AREA VARIANCE FACTS FOR FINDINGS The applicant has applied for a Variance to reduce the 8,000 square foot lot average requirement by 97 square feet The purpose of a Vanance is to • provide flexibility from the strict application of the development standards when speaal circumstances pertaining to the property such as size, shape, topography or location depraves such property of privileges entoyed by other property in the vianity and in the same district In order to grant a request for a Variance, the Planning Commission must make a series of findings Generally, these findings focus on C,D,E & F-2 ,,a, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM17222, DRC2005-01078, DRC2006-0047+7 AND DRC2006-00519 • NESS HOME DEVELOPMENT July 12, 2006 Page 3 " unique or specal circumstances applicable to a specific property Following are facts to support the necessary findings 1 Fact Without a reduct+on in the average lot area regwrement the applicant would have to subdivide the site into fewer lots that in turn would be much larger than the malonty of existing lots m the surrounding area, which would be inconsistent with the intent of the Dgvelopment Code Fording That strict or I~teral interpretation h~ cal haedshnt mfconssstent/w~h the object veuo~ result m practical d+fficulty or unnecessary p; y p this Code 2 Fact The applicant is subdividing a lot that +s surrounded by lots that were subdivided at a much earlier date, therefore, access is constrained and development of the lot that can only characte~to th'e sueound g aaea, or 2yBy beducing the BIOOOnsquare foottaveaage of area requirement by 94 square feet and creating lots that are substantially similar in size and character to the surrounding lots Finding That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties m the same zone 3 Fact Without the reduction in the average lot area requirement, the site would have to be subdwided into lots that are larger in size and out of character to the lots in the surrounding neighborhood Finding That stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the speafied regulation would deprave the applicant of privileges en/oyed by the owners of other properties m same zone 4 Fact The applicant is requesting to subdivide the site into lots that are at a similar density to the other lots in the surrounding area Finding That the granting of the Vanance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone 5 Fact The newly created lots will be indistinguishable from the surrounding lots other than being on average 94 square feet smaller in size than the 8,000 square foot lot average regwrement Finding The granting of the Vanance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially in/unous to the properties or improvements in the vicinity WALL HEIGHT VARIANCE FACTS FOR FINDINGS The applicant has applied for a Vanance to increase the maximum permitted wall height of 6 feet by an additional 3 feet along the west property line in order to construct combination retaining/garden walls The acoustical analysis for the proposed 4 lot subdivision indicates the need for 7-foot high sound attenuation walls to mitigate traffic noise along Carnelian Street The 7-foot high property line walls will be on top of 2 1/2-foot to 3-foot retaining walls C,D,E & F3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM17222, DRC2005-01078, DRC2006-00477 AND DRC2006-00519 NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT • July 12, 2006 Page 4 Fact That without the additional wall height the future property owners of the proposed lots would be subjected to traffic noise in excess of that which is permitted m the City's General Plan Finding That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the speatted regu/ahon would result m practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objective of this Code 2 designat det pbepwdhn an ex sting no ser co tourSthat is above the malx mum permittedan has Finding That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties m the same zone Fact Without the additional wall height the future property owners of the proposed lots would be subjected to noise level in excess of other residents m the same district Finding That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone 4 Fact The proposed walls will reduce the noise level on the subject lots to a level consistent with the General Plan Finding That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone homeownees ofdthe paoposedtlots and will njot othelrwisellaffect the healtharsafety andewelfare of the surrounding property owners Finding The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially in~unous to the properties or improvements in the vicinity LOT FRONTAGE WIDTH VARIANCE FACTS FOR FINDINGS The applicant has applied for a Variance becauseaof the ahgnlment of thec ulydeUSac tthat the ubdw soon w~llftake access from and the fact that the Carne) angStreetn anDartenal streetas Thepcull deasac runs) adjacentllt the southernapropertycleine, whi h pa9k rig tThe lotsmilquestaon meets the mr~n mum otrtw dth requirement aslmeasured at thel37 foot frlont yard setback Fact That wi developed at a the surrounding thout a reduction m the minimum frontage regwrement the lot would be lower density than dictated the in City's General Plan and out of character with lots in the Low Residential District C,D,E & F-4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM17222, DRC2005-01078, DRC2006-00477 AND DRC2006-00519 . NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT July 12, 2006 Page 5 Finding That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the speafied regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objective of this Code 2 Fact The Development Code requires that lots in the Low Residential District have a minimum street frontage of 40 feet measured at the right-of-way line The intent of which is to give each lot adequate area to provide street parking and landscaping and so that the streetscape ~s not dominated by driveways The lot in question gwckly widens from the front property line and meets the minimum lot width requirement as measured at the minimum front yard setback Without approval of the Variance, the site would have to be developed with fewer lots that are substantially larger and~out of character with the lots in the surrounding area ~ , Finding That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone 3 Fact Without the reduction in the street frontage width requirement the applicant would have to develop the site at a lower density than outlined in the City's General Plan for the Low Residential District This would result in lots that are out of character with the lots in the surrounding area and inconsistent with the intent of the General Plan Finding That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprave the applicant of pnwleges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone 4 Fact The proposed minimum frontage width reduction will allow the applicant to develop the site at a density which is similar in size and character to the lots in the surrounding area Finding That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special pnvtlege inconsistent wrth the I~m~taUons on other properties classified in the same zone 5 Fact The reduction in the minimum frontage requirement will mostly affect the future homeowner of the lot and will be of similar size and character to the surrounding lots Fording The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially in~unous to the properties or improvements in the wamty A Design Review Committee The Committee (McPhail, Stewart, and Coleman) reviewed the project on May 16, 2006, and recommended approval (Exhibit D) B Technical Review and Grading Committees The Committees reviewed the project on May 16, 2006 The project was conceptually approved C Neighborhood Meeting A neighborhood meeting was held on April 14, 2006 at the Lions Center A total of nine residents attended and were generally accepting of the size and layout of the lots One resident was concerned that the loss of trees on the site would be detrimental to local wildlife The applicant explained that the extension of the cul-de-sac, the layout of the lots and the health of the trees necessitate the removal of a majority of the trees Concern was also raised about the C,D,E & F-5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM17222, DRC2005-01078, DRC2006-00477 AND DRC2006-00519 , NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT • July 12, 2006 Page 6 loss of view of the mountains for residents living south of the site and whether the applicant would build new property line walls The applicant pointed out that the new houses would be below the height of the existing houses to the north of the site and that new property line walls would replace andtdes gnllof the houses t hbe bu It on the IotsmThe applicant exp ainedl that theythave n tayet decided whether they would sell off the lots or develop them If they developed the lots, they mranufacturer'tha9theyorepresentedulArsummary of meetingtls att hred (Exhib tfE) modular home D Environmental Assessment Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the protect Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined CultureltResources~Gteology and Soilsn Hydrology and aWater QualityQand Nog'el therel would be no substantial evidence that the protect would have a sigrnficant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the protect CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Dadv Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17222, Vanance DRC2005-01078, Variance DRC2006-00477, Vanance DRC2006-00519, Minor Exception DRC2005-01077 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00289 through the adoption of the attached , Resolutions of Approval with conditions Respectfully submittec~~ f~ Jam s R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT TV rlc Attachments Exhibit A - Vianity Map Exhibd B - Site Utd¢aUon Map Exhibit C - Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17222 Exhibit D - Design Review Committee Action Comments dated May 16, 2006 Exhibit E - Neighborhood Meeting Summary dated Apnl 14, 2006 Exhibit F - Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17222 Draft Resolution of Approval for Vanance DRC2005-01078 Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2006-00477 Draft Resolution of Approval fC pVE & Fns e DRC2006-00519 -. I i `--`i^.,, .^ ..~y :. '•' „~ ,sue/.~ v~4n"v=~i w.- .~ ~~~~~~~/~/ r,~ J ~ ~~! ~ : -- ~_~ ~ ~ ~a'F , r u r~ v~,r ~f: ~, ,ter '~ ~'f i .+ ] :r ..,~. • r ~`_+ ~'-YA~VIN . ~ . r~` •~~.-.'7 s' ~Ir. .~~.s. ~2.`'~Ni i sr ! /r=`:l j v~ ~r ~a.~~~'i /r ~« PROJECT SITE r r ~~ a c ~ M ~~'r r~;l r. r y~~~~ ~- ~,/ RsIY ~~~`Y Fill- k~r '~!"`$~_"%/''. r,~'=r,. ,`G rte... '.:%~5 .e 1 f „~~ f°% 5 r' ~ i+< <`+f'rrr ~<n. Y, ~,i xv~~"~S-'~ '••'~'~ -'' F~~d ( %: rrY\r`"li as .`f: r.- j ~ - .~N r I ~„r Os ~ i rX ~y YJ tiff ti ~,` }~ Jrir 1` r/r.:1`` ":` .r .ice` \ ~,_~„`f r ~' r..~ .. ___ ~ - .. 3, ri ~r'^. ~. . " ~~- ' + EXHIBIT A ~ ~~ Ys, i -- _ ~ C,D,E & F•7 ~. "~" ~rK\~ '~ i~ r d G M 1' 1 i ier ' , '_~: °= : ~ " -r .-,_s, ;mow s%1~ ;:far ~ .: , .r ~- , {r , r' _ ,,. 'J~ . n Q m T e ~~ ~2 9~ a Z 0 e4S L n~"/YI bl __-- _ SIDE UTILIZATION MAP >4~~ ~ - - ` .-~>r ,. ~~i of s=osz - °TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ® ~"~ NO. 1722 ie• ~ II o ;IRANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ~ ®E~ 0 o c ,; g -• ~ ~r .~Y ~ $ o ., ®.. ®.. ®„ r (112 AC J >z.'. `. ~° ~sO 58 20NED , ~ PRESIDENTIAL © og I$ p RESIDENTIAL ® a `•° +~ ax # ® ~(APARTMEMII ~ t® ILO ~ 6 Q !O e ' 1 , ~ U F 0 _ ~~ ~I~ :,2 ro u 1.083 AC 11 a O PUBLIC ~ 16 i ~ ~ UTILITY ~ ~~ 63 2 i YARO A mF I PP 2 AC ~ ~ a '~_l'.°l I 1© °2~ 12 ~ .w n >„ \ ~ G ZONI ®p ~ Z~ RESIDE ® * ; ~ r$- I(L01 ~ ~ ~ © I u ~ 1 O . ~ ~~ fe J • / + 0 ZONED ® Z ~ ® ® a OO ® v e~ w RESIDENTI " AL v ® ilea (LOM) + ~2 I p N M Zm a -g~ _ _ rn¢ p OO e me O. e 4 0e ~~ ~ SI ' C ~ n 0 A~ wo l ® Por. Lof r 10 13.se,nc. ma x_ 1 I SITE 11 Ili ..I II ~Hha I I ~ ii a ®~~ ®•" i w ~ .. ~ a' I ~-_,.~ I ` I1 eQ / I I ;o • ..~ ZI e ~ ~RESI Qee l ®„ I de l C,m ~6 ~ _- -__'it£E_ --- ~ 43.814 AC M/L LL W f~ U ul o~aca y 7 „ t Q ^L a e I „® e ~. ~ i o; o os /s ~~ - iie i4 (2L34 ac ra ~~ ~a .~ : z~ ~°~~ rc H °> ~~b j s O2 W z z . • o~e gf~ ~Z~ D =0{ 3~~I •~ y ~" a z s I -~ .s.a • • • E V yn "vx~Mx xvxO aM nmoamr~ ~ ~ onro-K9(erN eve aoco-ISe(nrn)xa 9e6 vJ 3NapY Y • • Oll 1N3WMJl3A303WOH SB3N WW11 " n WEE... a I L Og145 31M'NV xWxvJ 011K Paerl .g y • ~ m O _ .Imnxxypl~ +x If l l i a 1 V M a~x~na vao.~o oom wv^r ~ ~ s 3tllLL03LHONtl N3Nl30A 51 '•i ~ ir e ix p l t mi vi e'omr rm-~sa ZZLLI ON dVW l30tltld 3Al1V1N31 ~ ~ E y '.1C OIPIWNIIINI w ~ ~I• SNOISIA3N 1~311N~Mtl '1133N10N3 1~3fOtld ~ 11Y6 I ~ b RR E _ ~t ~ I ~" I I e Zz S ~ R Q W N ~ ~ N ~ W .v O ~Zu Q Z Z ~ W H I r ' ~~ ;~ ~§"vim ~ ~ ~i i F~y Y'e i yYa Q~ d i m»~ ..alga x Y ~ -- _CaaJwal-_____ _______ ________ _~ srm C R e I ~i~s ao i „ ® (b ~{ b _ ~p f E _ 3°e ....w ~9 ~i c ql ~ pl ~ ~ e I ~ I l~ I- II I I ~ I I ~ W,"I " L-I EI _ ..- ~ , n II r, ~ j ~ aF. V"R >,s.: J I I ~I I" ~ ~ w ,~ i I I ~ Ilb ~~9 ~ ~I I I V ~' ~ .a I ~~ ~ 6y ~ O ~ pp Y5i p ~ ~ X11" / ~~ ~ ¢~p I ~ ~~~ O I ~ pY~ ~a~9 I ~ `~ ae.: I I y ~~ e ---C-}~~ ------- I~ ~ ~'~ 11. 11 p P r. ~ ~ ~ T~I U ~ Q ~~ 3 p f7 m~ Na ~ 4 E;T Q ~ y~ B ~ Yq ~~ ~~~ I- ~ ~ ~~ p I --------------- T---------- -- -- ---- -- ---- - ----------------~--------------- ~----- ~ -- - ' ---1---=--~--------- ------- -mm .nmax p Esawnm EE m xnvirn m sum. sarn a ----- ---------` 1HAY~ -_------ 0 B A p e~ ~ ~ . ~ q~a & a 2 e a b ~ ~~~• ~ ~ ~ G~ b r n 9 ><8 ~ ~ ~~~~ mp 6~( 5e yy'' • • t 4Q y u~ 2' ~ € '' G P w Fe ~2 y glaF E b g~b O y`~ ry,YS C'I S m6 :3 ~ ~~~s uKtl RA t~! a K p q ~ q5 Qqq pQ5G' aC'!~ b~' 6 i F"ek gEa DBbty ~~ P ~~ ~a b ~3~8 F~ '~ YP ~' q apP ~3s~ 6e -E Ib e a ~~ ~' +~tld~§t :§pre 8~ ® ' '~ W $i{ Y p oyP~s§/l, b~J~, 3 b ¢F 2~~ v° 0 x F~ 4_ A i Y 8360 k'~Sg6~6F~ A i~ 6C~ ap ~i $ 8 „_ c W~ ~~ ~~i r 9 ~~ "s n, ~9 d ~ F C~ p p g o ~ S fu p"e~ ~~ S~f y ~ YX 4 e"€ 6 Sg6 y 6® ~ ~~ E 6~ F 9 8~ R" E e e P . o a€ a~r~ s ~5e9s t ~~^ CDE&F-9 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS ~ • 7 10 p m Tabe van der Zwagg May 16, 2006 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17222 - NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT - A request to subdivide 0 92 acre of land into 4 lots in the Low Residential Distract (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located 100 feet north of Vivero Street, on the east side of Carnelian Street - APN: 0207-551-73. Design Parameters The protect site is located 100 feet north of Vivero Street, between the termihus of Candlewood Avenue and Carnelian Street on a parcel of 92 acre The parcel is generally square in shape with an overall depth of about 207 feet from east to west and a width of 194 feet from north to south. All of the surrounding properties are developed with single-family residences The existing topography slopes from about 1,388 feet at the north property line to about 1,379 feet at the south property line. , The applicant proposes subdividing the existing lot into four lots for future development of one single-family residence per lot The existing lot is currently developed with asingle-family residence that takes access off of Carnelian Street. The existing residence will be demolished prior to final map approval. The new lots will take access from the proposed extension of Candlewood Avenue, which currently terminates at the east property line Because of the short length of cul-de-sac extension of Candlewood Avenue, Lot 3 is being developed as a flag lot with 20 feet of street frontage. The lot sizes of the proposed lots are as follows: Lot 1 - • 7,884 square feet, Lot 2 - 7,375 square feet, Lot 3 - 8,888 square feet; and Lot 4 - 7,465 square feet. Variance The proposed parcel map and the parcels created comply with the City's regwrements for lot width, depth, and minimum lot area that are applicable in the Low Residential District, however, the average lot area for the four lots is 7,903 square feet, which is 97 square feet less than the City's 8,000 square foot average lot area regwrement The applicant has filed a Variance for lot area (DRC2005-001078). Staff supports the Variance because of the reduction in area being only 1 percent and lots being similar in size and character to the surrounding lots Staff Recommendation: Staff recommended approval of the protect as proposed Desian Review Committee Action• Members Present McPhail, Stewart, Coleman Staff Planner Tabe van der Zwagg The Committee recommended approval of the protect as presented ~~~ ~ q ' ~ ® C,D,E 8 F-10 C~ r1 ~J • 0 Report Summary Neighborhood Mtg (subdvision) When April 14, 2006 6 30pm Where Lions Center East Thomas Room 9161 Base Line Rd Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Kim, Lee Nam (land owner) Kim, Jung Hwan Nebs Home Development Nam Ho Park Sunny Ross Anna Jung Paul Kim Ron Martin & Associates Engineering Walter Clendenon Neighbors sign in sheet attached We are pleased with the turnout from the neighborhood We feel we were able to address as many questions from the neighbors as possible Many of there concerns were regarding the new house plan model more than the actual beginning process of the land parcel (subdivision) Some neighbors felt the two story housing would block "their mountain view" ,There was little questions about the amount of noise or traffic congestion but more attention paid to the house plans One neighbor's concern reflected the aged trees that housed blueiays He wanted to see them preserved if possible Mr Alejandro F Rubio 951-217-7981 asked for higher retaining wall, he spoke to Walter the engineer from Ron Martin & Associates and if done per his request this would create a 12ft wall for the future planned residence creating a unusually high wall on the planned home sites Because most of these concerns addressed problems relating to housing we felt that there was no visible concerns with the first step process to subdivide the land e also welcomed any future suggestions by passing out the company's business card along with brochure of our home manufacturer "Champion Homes" Ei Bt~i~ C,D,E&F-11 ~vBe~oN~nB_N~~~~ BNF®Rf~l99~;TE®N B=®B~ii~ (P~~ 0 ~ 6a~itiaB Study py o/RenMO e:ucarnonae )Please ryPa or print dearly uamg Mk use the taD kay to move nom orre llne to are nave Ones PlanNna OMekn (40a)477d7s0 . The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components p~ojeet so that the City may review the project pursuan# to Cliy Policies, Guidelines; the' California Environmentat Guality`~"/[at, ~and'~ the- ~I Procedures to Implement CEQA. h 6s important that thelrtformatioe~ r 6e~ rovided in full. :, • ~.~ :~-T;-. r. :~,f,~~'....fi,.m;~;n~:. application P ' .. `- = - ,i , ~,#~ ~•:'•~ i . - - ; ~ :• ~"_ Upon review; of the complefed,•Initial Study Part fanex~the:developir additional infdrmatioe`such as, but not limited'td;b'sffie;.noi"s'e, lilfilogit: geological reportis,may tie required._ The projectapplication,:wiii noE~bed unless•the ifentified spectai studies/reports art: sybrnitted;fo} revitw complete arid,adequate.The project application-will.'nol»tis`sctiedufed review unless all'•required reports are•submitted'artd;eidemed comj prepare, the_fnitiai Study Part II as required by CEQ%4:%'.trnaddition=`to•# appliCant:will bp~responsble to pay,of reimburse tha~i##G"1~"a9ents consultarits~ftfr°all coet& foG tha Preparation;; review~:analysisr ie~ 1?~=J mitigation"s„eti:.,ofatiyspecia4studies"orreports';5,~., _,,;,'`; Ir••;,,,,;,~; ,- mlonrmtMn. 'i ilrainage~ slid = ined`e,'o111p"left: d aceepte~'as~,` r Committees' ~; togs t+D :Ming`{e®; the• ` fficers,~ and/or ' - ~_.• ~. m_ rnendatibns,. . .! ~ 1`.• .Yfi.. a t;i7. P/easeno~ethatit/stheresponsiDHltydtheapplicantfoenaule~hat sfel/ will not be available fo PeAonn wak re9wead f0 prowde missing Application Number for the P^ale~ ro which fh/s form pertains: ProQecf trite: ~-' Name B Address of project owner(s): pP~o•5 - 02~ , ~ 2 ~ 5 3`( GJ~~.NEL «~ `- ~V~t..oPM~'~T, LLG. LOS ~ ~ 00 I O m ft s onsOr.• Z~6-~i~ >aS 1~C"J O ~~ Name 8 Address of developer arP /e P IrypI,pNNINGIFINAL1FORM51000NTER4NSa1 SadY Parts docPage 10110 Rev 3/17104 I C~ r~ L_J C,D,E & F-12 HINT F ~~ N COnrect pprsOli 8 Address. T ~ tr 1 '°' "'-tee ~V / t v - , G1~~ GALt~=~y~Cao~c7~Gy~~c ~~o, ~~.J _. ~ _ _ . Gt~~i'.i1~t~ 1 c~ ~ v• ._ ti U~ , Name & Address of person preparing thla farm (d drAerent Irom above): Informar/orr Indkated by an asterisk (~ !s not requlnad of rtwrCOnBhucHon CUP^s uNesa ofhenxlae requested by sfa/f. 'i) Provhie a fun scale (912 x 71) copy offhe USGS auadranf sheer(s) which Includes rna Praylecf atte, and hdlcafe rho one poundariea. 2) Prowde a set of cdor photograP/rs that show representadve vlewa ~ the ens horn Me oath, souHt, eas4 and west; views info and fib the alts /rom the pNmary access porme Oret senre the sft'e; and repreaenfathre Views o/ sigr~cant learures ~ the alts. Indude a map showing Mcadon of each PhOtOlPaP~ s) Pro)ad t.ocation (desufbe): pt- ~ ~ P rTj ~ ~ \ O/~ TG N r OD D i i~ .! . iTi~-. ~ ~ l ./~ / /'.d'Q l~~ Y.l it Pc.LV `~ t • • 4) Assesscv's Parcel Numbers (atfaeh addlNonal sheet d necessary)' O Z ~ i - ~ - ~ - ~~ •5) Gross sne Area (edsq d:): G}-'D ~ iJ ~ `JQ • 1 •B) Ner SJte Mee (tote! aria yze minus area of public sheets 8 proposed ~b¢-7~ G~ Gj- /~ . ~' ` dedications): ll "` 7) Descnhe any proposed genere/ plan amendment a zone change whieh would alfecf the pro/ed drB (attach ad0ibonal sheet d necessary). . OUNTER~ImBal ShidY ParN.docPege 2 ar t0 I ~PLANNINGPINALIFORMStC Rev. 3H71a4 QD,E & F-13 Telephone Number l~~T { ~ ~ ~ 1 ' " O 8© x ~ t 3) Include a descrlptton pfall pe mrts whrth w~l7 be necessary hom the Cdr of Rancho GrCemonga alid'tNhe!'gOVelttll7Bma! agenaea !n order to fully ru the Prof rtUal setting of the site as It exists before the pro)ed including frrlormattnn on roPoBmPDY.'~l ~'~~' 9) Describe the phys' pfanfs and an/me/s, mature Trees, hails and roads, drainage courses, end seen/c aspetds.hDef ~~ Daos structures Or1 site pnduding age and candrtron) and the use of the structures. AMach phoro9rep desulDed. !n addition, dfe alt souroes ofinfamation (le., gedogical and/whydrotogle ahrdhrs, Notic and erchedoglcal surveys, traffic ahMles): , x / I ~ \ i..t ~' S fO) Descn'Daknown~~tandhxtustodca/aspectsofth~ade. and era/ history): ~ _ _ ~ 1\PLANNINGIFINALIFORMS~OIINTERUnrhel SNOY P~~d~aga 3 of 10 Cite all sources olirdormatlon (booluA pubpshed reports Rev. 3117704 `Irr • • C,D,E & F-14 11j Desarbaanyndses°urcas° theirlevclsfhatnowaRecflhesHe(aiid'aR,roe orse,etc-)endhowBreYwlRalllCf Proposed uses: _ _ .., ~ r-- ~ >~~ I r`- t2) Aesarbe the proposed pooled In detail, This shouts provide an adequate descripfron of the si~~fe im~rn~ofRN ~ u ~ that will result from the ProPos~ pro)ed. Indicate d there ere Proposed phases for de davelopmerM ro occur with each phase, and the erdiclpated complefron ofeach inaemerd• Attach atldRlonef ~~) y netesserY. ._ ~ _ ._.. , . r ~ , -rz ~ X-t~-~i-~ .LE U~ 13) Describe the srsroundrng Properties, lnduding rn/avmadon on p/errfs and animals and any cuRrrrdl, hisMrkab a SceMc aspeds. !ndlesfe the type of lend use (resrdeMial, commerrlal, elm). intensify o(lanso (o+~- ~ e~ merit houses, shops, depanmenl stores, atm) and stela of developmera (helgtM, RwNage. 1 'T~c 1 ~ ~CTtz'P-Ch~~ll ~ C.~ ~L ~ 1 N l~~ ~i`~ ~ 1 L`-t~ E N~~lf~r1 5T -._ _ --___-.. ,.,.,rots rhanae the padem, scalB, m character Mthe surrounding general ergs o/the p+oJed? f 4J • ~ tiPtJ~NNINGFlNAIIFORMSVb~~RUrittlal SWdY Pent doCPage 4 of 10 Rev. 3/17104 C,D,E 8 F-15 •~ ~,J ~~J~i~ 1~) Indreatethetypeofshort-ter lor+g-term noisefobeganerated,im levBls afled adjacem p and on•sife uses? YVhat methods o/ arrmYYo--u^^nt~~Ffi~W+vtB these ndae, ~~•~•~vv7i I r _ _. C_S ~ ~ `1 B) Indicate plppogad removals endor replacements o1 mature or sCenlc trees: , S ~~v ~ ~ 18) Irrdk:ate expected anroun! 01 wafer usage. (See A/tachment A 1e1 usage estimates). For /u/ther daAficatlon. Please contact the Cueemange Valley Water Dlstrkt st gB7-a5g1. a Resddenhal (gatrday) Pack use (gal/Day) ~- A t;ommerda(tlnd. (ga4day/ac) Peak use (gaYmiNec) _,~ Sewer. owedm~thod o/sewage d/sposeA ^ Septic Tank 18) Indiate prof m!s proposed Jnd/cate d septic tanks are proposed, atiadf perco/ahon Pests I/ discharge ro e sanitary sewage syste ass oontad the expedatldaUysewagageneration: (SoeAthdchmenlAfarusageestimates) ForfurtherderificaBon.P~ Cucamonga Valley Wffier Didrld at 887-2591. a. Resldardial (9aUday) ~ ' b. Cpmmarc7al/lndusfdal (ga1/day/ec) - RESJDENTIAL PR CTS: 20) Number of residential urdts: __ ~rxliCero range o1 parcel slaw, minimum lot she and maximum let site: 1 J _~, .-.r c~~ O~ r''~ 971 !i L ~, gtia (indicate whether unNs are rental ar (or ale unks): 1 ~P~ANNINGIFINAUFORMSICOUNTERVnleal Study PdM.ood'age S 0170 ftav 3/77A4 • t~-'~ . C,D,E & F-16 17) lndlcete any bodies o/water (induding domestic water supplies) inro wlsch the alto drams: 29) Antiapared range of sale nd/or mots' 22) ~~ ~J Sale Pnce(s) 5 fo $ Rent (P~ ~~) $ fo 8 Speclly number of bedrooms by un/t type. 23) IrxliGete anticipated houseno/d size by unH type: _ 'L ~ `"~ ~~J ~~~ ~S ~~~ 24) Indicate fl+e expelled number of school children who wJl be residing within the pntjeG: Contact Me appropriate School Dlstr~cta es shown m AffacnmeM B. a. Efamerdary•' Sj Jx Junior H/gh: a Senor hfigh 26) pe type of use(s) and ma/or IunG/on{s) of commerc/al, iMusfrial w instlfuNonaf uses: 26) Tatat 8aa area of canmercie, " dusfrral, a inadtutinne! uses by typo: ~, 27) Indicate hours of operehon' 28) Number of employees. ,,~ Tofah. Maximum Shi/f' Time of Maximum ShItY 11pl,ANNINGIFINALV'ORMSICOUN1ERVniEal SNdY Partt docPege 8 0! t0 Rev, 3/77/04 C,D,E & F-17 29) Provide breakdown ofanGcip lob dassificatrons, meluding wage and salary rarer, es wallas an rridicaHon d Me rate of hue for each c/ass!(rcation ( addidone! sheet d nee9SSary): • 30) ESbmet/on o/ the number M workers to 6e .37J venfl d through fire SouthiCoast A! ~Quakty Mang type, and amount oI au pollution emisalaAS (Uete should De tpu, of (8t8) 572-8283): , ALL PROJECTS ' 32) Nave ~ ~fuete seMCe to the ProPosedm ~ect7nN so, please l~cate theN ~spon ~ rond~ a~te!rmrne their e~Yy fo provide adeq - - ~,~ / I h 1 ~~ ~ ~ . ~t ~V ~/ 33) !n Me known history of this property, has there been any use, storege, or drscher9~of~cteve substances; Pe mahcrdes aM and sEore~.' ofanyol Me above. Examples ofhazardousand/or toxic matertak Include, but are notlrmited to P s' es wag as the dates of use, it lrertuwdes• fuels, oils, solvents, and ofherflammable figmdasna~o d ~eAlsO ~ ~AeM, Pleeae list Me materials and describe their use, arorage, !mown. ~ ~ 1 ~~~`° ~ 4. 1~ I I i~i~ r GX~~T 1 . I \PLANNING\FINALI~RMS\OOUN7ER\ImUal SNdy Part7.docPe9e 7 ~ 10 currenfly resale !n Me,City: Rev 3I17N9 ~J C,D,E & F-18 ~~ S eetirrvoNefhetemporeryorlong-termuse,storage,ordisch fpazardow*er'd/orfo'ricmetedels, 34) WUl the proposed pro% ~ricluding but not /Im~fed ro those examples listed above? ll yes, prowrde an love amend Malprr~t areas ha be shown antl proposed method o/drsposaL The rocabon ofsuch uses, along wlfh fha storage, labeled on the aPPfrcagotr Plans. ~ ~ • u/red for hereby certify that the Statement8 funushed above and in the attached exhibhs presets the data sod IMorrnatlon req adequate eva/uafion of fhisProl~f fo fire best ofmy abdlry, that the facts statements, and intormetion presented are true and correct tot he best ofmy knowledge and Delref ! further understand that add!(f,~,.,~~f1irdormafion may ba required ro be gubmdfad Deters an adequate eva/uadon can be made by the Gty of kancho Cucamonga. / _~ ~ , ''I 1 i Date: i ~ 2 J y ~ Signature: Tr7fe: ~rtGfN~-~~ ~.~Nr1~ n L.J • _ .....,....•nue~ ~FnFMS\CAUNTERUnItlel SNdY Part~•00~P89e 8 °i 10 Rev. smroe C,D,E & F-19 •~ , '3r, UNIT~Q b ~-FS ~'~'- DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR -< ~` A max: °- GEOLOGICAL S JEY 1 ]7`iT,30' 4J"-"`E ~-~. v~ it o, -di r4i, 35 34' G r' 36' . ! •_~g•r<rnnra. I -___ Ke ` • ,~' ..: ~` r °.` ~ -. •. ` __ _ i- 'S_` Neu _ ,. s~!` is-~ -_ "'_ l~::Alta Loma ~.e-~.~'1'----."~~~ . 1+ ~` ~~.t` ,:Tat ~~a ~ .{~` ,--•._ -~~/,::.e.l `_ _..~_ 'c'am jkl='3c~-:. -_ __ _ r.a~- t. ~1-~ fi~ ~- 1. ' ~1~ _ ~--~ ees-~ 'Lan_'r ~ 3 t- Rna~r .~ -F pR -y - S?'-J-~a~~;~ ~}(l _ r' Nelms 'tf t ~ ~„ a~ '.~`~y~_3T1.'$31L~. I. q~ + {~J 1 _ _.. ~ , • ~Y '4' Yy. •, ~! •y~~.....~e• ~~i~Y'I.' ~ Fes'.!-.} ~,~s,~..r _ - ~ - ~.- -~- ~ ~-~ d _ .• ~ __ at k t:: ~ I ~< _T A - ~ F(r ~_ Fslh ~ ` pa., ~,' ___ ~~~.,+'' 1 ( ~.-r' ~ Cicamor6r I....~' T c• ~ -~,~ ~1 ! :~_~ t -r '; tsla~cal 6nn~morkl n ~'S4•.._ _ ~r = ~ti'y ..~Ix ~ ~ > _ ~ 1 .~ .~ ~-~w • e ~ I ~ a 3113 ~ Jt Jritt, ~ ., ._. ~ ~ ,~' y __ ~,~,y ~.'~ ('ucamo~h -. ~ -`_ ~ ~ ;C;7Y~' z ate` ~ _ { RaSlcfiowe•S; _ r .~ I"= .~ `~,~- I ^-- ':-~ 3 f..' f • /' r mow. ~ ~ ~ i..Yti.~~' :A• ~'~ ET . `J!f•y'. ~1 _ _ :fir ~•..~T. - ~.• ~~ c" ---"- ~ ~FeSerw r %. ~ _ ~~tiRFEF '# . d _ _ ~ I _ ~~. ~ brn - la''-.i~'_ _ - _. I +... ~`__==- s$t g~8±~ icse,.xz_r-~u>.- %f' ~)`S&b;."^ ( i Imo, i._a -~1~ 1 / ~ ; ~ Y 'CSC 54- Z s~ • _ ~' ,- ~s ~ ~~ -t ~y _ '`.a ~1 J iT4ar r (mom z<~~ wy- Q Og. ` "G~ ~fhrk fly` ~_. _ ,~ S - az ~~ ~[R ARDlN -_xSs~:=: 'r-tea t _,y -~ ~W2fee We! __ _ Yx` 6 ri~~ _F~ -W. f - 1 • owrus 'awi+r rw.nw oms wer, ~au~ixxrva3x~on si LL~311N~tl0 a J W ~~ ~~ ae d, >! ~' F z zuu aNdvrlia~ava3nuvut~ x.vwunonuam 8 ~~o {~ W D Z W V ®^ ygs aye ~ $ ~- 7 3 g'Bc ~ e a z s 6 g ¢¢b ~6 g~ gg ppgs F 9sF ~'~. kFF &y ~ e9, ~ 3q= E~ ~ ib s pz 9~~+( ° ~ ~ y p „ ~ 5~ .'i 5 ~ a ~ ~ 5Y C~ i °b°~ of ~8 s 'off F7 ~~ g~ ~ tl §@~$ E F 8 $I s .. 4 r , °m ~ i~ ~ ~ Yt's 2 g~ ~~ `e_ a d ~ gE ~ F5 ° §°~~ "~ e ~ ~ 3K Yp C 4 ~' B 7p Q ~gb ~~ ~i b A c- ~ ~~~ ~ 4 4(' ~E~ c~~~ C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s p~ yq4' Bg' C ~~ Pa y°~ ~ n ~~§pNp ~~ d ~ e ~f Ea ~~" ~ ~ ~ € e a ~a ~~ ~~~~ ~~~tl~~ ~p a : ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ g~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ gg gg CC!~ o~o~~~ j Fe ~~~ 2 e4~ § $2'~§~? n ka ~ ~w k Y'~_ 4p ~' ~a S a € ~ ~ A e 6 C,D,E & F-21 . j ,j ,~ ;'t . ._k ' ~~, ~~ r~` • ~ - , i~" ~~ ~ ~ ~,) 1 G y r~~` `~:y t. ~~ tr_ ~ ° i _ r , ul • ~J --~.,: ~-$ .~,~r;,;..w _~ - +~ r~~ i f, >t ' ~ r R ,., _ . ' ' , r ~ , ,' % ; - "J ,~;.~ ti' ~.~f 'rti~:Rrfil~'. z l' - I / / Y ~~+ ~ ~. - 7 ' ~!y ~Sf`~~.. J ~, I f ~!'ya.J~ . ~, r~' ' , , ,'f ' _ f ~ ry~~~w= sri"., - ~'~~~ ~+ ~n_ +p ~ ~ f ~ _ _z ~^ ii . ~ "L3: 2. I x, _ 1 y„\`r ' i \\„ 9 A p{ h t~ ,1, ,f •, Nom': ;'ry'~y~~~Wi ~~ fj+piwl ]~.-,i . .f/~ 1_ Ix..+ i f+ ' ~ ;~ , ~~ ' f ~~a~ 1 ~ is __ js t !(° •~y? ,~,.J ;' ~> 3 v' ~'i-_ ~ . , is r . ~ j~. ~,l ~Ftl , i's`y'~ rn ~ + . ~! ~ ~ ~r "t ~~ ~a 1 ~` r 1v~i ~.~ r ~, S^S~e ~ r ~YY -5.~; ..+: ~ - ~v r` "irY~~ _ ~ 5~( ~ !-1 ,. r,y- ~ ~ r ~: r yK +~ ~ ~fj~ I~ j • [~' LLB, ;`~(' : tl~:~~e Yr-- , 1 'M{ -, -; _ .~ ~ ' y ei'CI' t~ Y~'n ~~r~~ x ~y- , ~'l '.,~ aIi ~4 7 1' ,y c' • 1 ' z_ ~- [I.~f# ~ J 4z f'- , , ~~ ., I1r 1" 1 arj J _ ~ `t - ~ c,~ 't c,.r~ ) r ~_.~: ~ , era: J4fr 4 ' --~:ts ! C,D,E & F-25 e s ' City of Rancho G~ucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM ' INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project Ftle: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17222 2. Related Fdes: DRC2005-01078 (average lot area Variance), DRC2006-00477 (wall height Variance) and DRC2005-01077 (wall height Minor Exception) 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP - SUBTPM17222 - NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT - A subdivision of 0 92 acre of land into 4 lots in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located 100 feet north of Vivero Street, on the east side of Carnelian Street - APN 0207-551-73 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Nebs Home Development 3600 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1816 Los Angeles, CA 90010 5. General Plan Designation• Low Residential C2-4 dwelling units per acre) 6 Zoning: Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) • 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting• The property ig surrounded to the north, south, east, and west by single-family residences The site is presently developed with one single-family I residence The site drains from north to south and contains 18 trees of various species 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Ciwc Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9 Contact Person and Phone Number: Tabe van der Zwaag, Assistant Planner (909) 477-2750 10 Other agencies whose approval is required (e g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement)• GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report. CVWD -Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP-Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G • C,D,E & F-26 • u Initial Study for SUBTPM17222 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one trnpact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (/) Aesthetics ()Agricultural Resources (/) Av Quality (/) Biological Resources ()Cultural Resources (/) Geology & Sotls ()Hazards & Waste Materials (/) Hydrology & Water Quality ()Land Use & Planning ()Mineral Resources (/) Noise ()Population & Housing ()Public Services ()Recreation () Transportation/Traffic ()Utilities & Service Systems ()Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the bans of this initial evaluation (/) I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the protect have been made by, or agreed to, by the roponent A TIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be predared ~~ r ~ / /Date ~~/06 Prepared By - P O 1 / s~ Reviewed By e Rev 5/24/06 C,D,E & F•27 Initial Study for SUBTPM17222 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 Less man ~ $iprvfKant Lew Issues and Supporting Information Sources PotanUaily Sgrvi¢ant WiN MmgaUOn man 9prvficant i ~No I act Inco ratetl I act I n EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would fhe prolect a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas O O U (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ~ () (/) () ( ) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing casual character or O O U (/) quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (/) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adt8cent to the protect site The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 b) The protect site contains 25 trees of various species An arborist report was prepared (Roth, October 25, 2005) which concluded that a cluster of 9 Italian Cypress trees to be good candidates for preservation One tree, a Frwtless Mulberry, is suitable for preservation, however, is a species considered to be a poor landscape specimen The site contains no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga Therefore, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) The developer shall submit a tree replacement landscape plan prior to issuance of Grading Permits. The plan shall include replacement with at least 25 trees, in minimum 24-inch box size, and may include street trees and other front yard trees. Actual planting should occur prior to final occupancy of residences on these lots. c) The site is located located 100 feet north of Vivero Street, on the east side of Carnelian Street and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north, south, east, and west The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this protect Design review is required prior to approval City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The protect would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on Site Plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare The lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the protect site The impact is not considered significant C,D,E & F•28 I~ ~, Rev 5/24/06 • r~ ILJ Initial Study for SUBTPM17222 City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 4 Lass Than i 9gndmant Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potenbaily S,gndmant W,ih MNgabon Then S,gmhcent •Jo I act Into rated I act 1 ecl 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project ' a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (/) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agncultural use, or a O O O (/) ' Williamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (/) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments. a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is located 100 feet north of Vivero Street, on the east side of Carnelian Street and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north, south, east and west There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) The site is located 100 feet north of Vivero Street, on the east side of Carnelian Street and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north, south, east, and west The nearest agricultural use is more than 1 09 miles southeast from the protect site Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated 3 AIR QUALITY. Would the project a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (/) applicable air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to an existing or protected air quality violation Rev 5/24/06 C,D,E 8 F-29 Initial Study for SUBTPM17222 City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 5 Less Than Sign,hcant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potenhally Sign,hcant With Minganon Than SIBn~ficant i No Im act Inco oratetl I act 1 act c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase, of () () () (/) any criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations e) Create obtectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of peoples Comments• ~ , a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Gucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a protect-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. LJ u Rev 5/24/06 C,D,E & F30 Initial Study for SUBTPM17222 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Legg Then siprvbcant L•sg Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g '°`°""°"Y Sipnificent w"" Mibpebon '"°" S~pnikam No I ect lixo tad I I n 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rute 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) Ail asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAt]MD Rules 402 and 403. ,~ Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soli during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carved over to adfacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of constructlon. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWaC6]) dagily to reduce PM~p emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW~CB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,p emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After Implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR • (Section 5 6) Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) model estimates in Table 56-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nitrogen Oxides (Nox), ROG, and PM,p would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect bases to a level less-than- Rev 5/24/06 C,D,E & F-31 Initial Study for SUBTPM17222 City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 7 Less Tflan ' SiBmhwnt less ' Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potennatly signnicam WiU Maiyauon Then SigmGCanf I No I <t Inco rated Ira ad I act significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. i I 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide Increase in dperational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 The protect site is located adtoining sensitive receptor residences and is within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors at Valle Vista Elementary School and Red Hill Park Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated r1 LJ ~J C,D,E & F32 Rev 5/24/06 '~, • Initial Study for SUBTPM17222 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 • \J Less Than Sipnihcant Less Issues and Su ortn Information Sources pp g votannany SiBndicant wpm MiLganon Than Significant ~No m act Inco oreteo I act I eh 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Would the protect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (/) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or ' regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (/) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wddhfe Services ' c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal 'pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () () () (/) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments• a) The protect site is located in an area developed with residential uses The site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and the existing single-family residence on the site According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The protect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on site, meaning the protect will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on site As a result, protect implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The matority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated Rev 5/24/06 C,D,E & F-33 '~ Initial Study for SUBTPM17222 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Loes Then ~ Sipmhcant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources Fofanfiany SiBni0canl wen Miepaeon Then Sgnd¢enf No I aGf Inco refetl I ect I ecf e) The prolect site contains 25 trees of various species An arbonst report was prepared (Roth, October 25, 2005) which concluded that a cluster of 9 Italian Cypress trees to be good candidates for preservation One tree, 'a Fruitless Mulberry, is sudable for preservation, however, is a species considered to be a poor landscape specimen The report goes on to state that little effort should be made to alter construction plans to accommodate these trees Therefore, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-sighificant levels 1) The developer shall submit a tree replacement Landscape Plan prior to issuance of Grading Permits. The plan shall Include replacement with at least 25 trees, in minimum 24 inch bpx size, and may include street trees and other front yard trees. Actual planting should occur prior to final occupancy of residences on these lots. ~ , f) The prolect site is not located wdhin a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservatien plans will occur 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the prolect a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries Comments. a) The prolect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the prolect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 511) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will. • • n LJ Rev 5/24/06 C,D,E ~ F-34 r1 U Initial Study for SUBTPM17222 City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 10 i Less Than i Sigmficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potencalty 9gmhcant wnn Mrtigafion man 9gnifiwm ~No Im ad Inco oratetl I act I act • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvum, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The protect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i e., San Bernardino County Museum) Rev 5/24/06 C,D,E & F-35 Initial Study for SUBTPM17222 City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 11 less Than S,gnificant Less Issues and Supporting information Sources Potenaaliy SignRCant Wrth MiagaOOn Than Significant ~ No Impact Inw rated I act I act d) The proposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The protect site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure and the development of the existing single-family residences on and surrounding the site No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area No evidence is in place to suggest the protect site has been used for human burials The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050 5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 As adherence to State regulations is regwred for all development, no mitigation is regwred in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site No adverse impacts are anticipated 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project , a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, intury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/) delineated on the most recent Algwst-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shakmg~ O U U (/) uQ Seismic-related ground failure, including O O U (/) liquefaction iv) Landshdes~ O O O (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soli that is unstable, () () () (/) or that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (/) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (/) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Specal Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 51 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hill Fault passes within 1/2 mile south of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 2 7 miles north These faults are both capable of producing M„, 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to M„, 7 5 earthquakes is 13 miles • C r 1 L_J Rev 5/24/06 C,D,E & F-36 • • Initial Study for SUBTPM17222 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Less Than Sigrnfcanf Lase Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potenaally Sigmncant wnn MiLgaoon man Sigruficanl Pb I ct Inco orated I I ect northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to M„, 8 2 earthquakes, is 15 miles northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-s ig n rficant b) The proposed protect will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils The Rancho Cucamonga area is subtect to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PMiq emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,q emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMiq emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMiq emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The protect would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 51-2 Soil types onsite consist of Ramona Sandy Loam Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 C J d) The matority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types onsite consist of Ramona Sandy Loam Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 These soils are typically used for dry-farmed small grains and irrigated citrus, alfalfa, small grains and pasture Runoff is medium, and the hazard of erosion is moderate where the soil is not protected by vegetation No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The protect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed C,D,E & F-37 Rev 5/24/06 l~ Initial Study for SUBTPM17222 City of Rancho Cucamonga . , Page 13 Less Than ~~ SignJicanl Less ' Potentially With Than ~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sigmhcant Mmganon Significant No Im act Inco orated I act I act 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the pro/ect., a) Create a signficant hazard to the public or the O O O (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the O O O (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substan$es, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of O O U (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would iR create a signficant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, O O O (/) would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area g) Impair implementation of or physically intertere with an O O O (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of O O O (/) loss, intury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adtacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ Comments: a) The protect will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state The Clty is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal regwrements The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse Impacts are expected b) The proposed protect does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other In the state The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and • • Rev 5/24/06 C,D,E 8 F3a ',~ Initial Study for SUBTPM17222 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 less Than Sigmhcant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potenhally Sigmf¢ant Wifh Mmgauon Than Significant 'No I act Inco erred I atM 1 act Federal requirements The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are anticipated , c) There are schools located within 1/4 mile of the protect site The protect site is located within 1/4 mile of Valle Vista Elementary School and Red HIII Community Park Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The proposed protect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport Protect site is located approximately 4 miles southerly of the Ontano Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster Because the protect includes does not have at least two points of public street ' access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated (pending fire department mitigation) h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed protect site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the protect a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements () (/) () ( ) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (~) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the O O O (~) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site Rev 5/24/06 C,D,E & F39 Initial Study for SUBTPM17222 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Lass Than Signifitent Leas PotenLally With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources S,gmda~nt Ingo gorateE S,pniflcarit Ng d) Substantially alter the existing dra1nage pattern of the () () () (~) site or area, including through the alteration of ,,the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surtace runoff In a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (~) e) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () ('~) () ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (~) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (~) that would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (~) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp t) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (~) Comments: a) Pro)ecta sd des gned to'cconnecotvtoe ex sting watermand sewer systetmsDlsThe (Sts eDof California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, regwring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RU/OCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment Prior to commencement of construction of a protect, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit The General permit regwres all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading Develop and Implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation Perform inspections of all Best Management Practices (BMPs) C,D,E & F-40 • • Rev 5/24/06 Initial Study for SUBTPM17222 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Less Than Sgnificant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources PotenLally Signifcant With Mingaaon Than Significant No I act Inco ratetl I act I act Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction protect discharges A construction protect for new development or significant redevelopment requires an (NPDES) permit Construction protect proponents are required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) To comply with the NPDES, the protect construction contractor will be required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Kevin Kim of Nebs Home Development on November 11, 2005, that identifies Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction Runoff from driveways, ,roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods Structural~controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm dram system The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent • • Construction Achvdies 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) ' specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum. a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Rev 5/24/06 C,D,E & F-41 Initial Study for SUBTPM17222 City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 17 Less Than Si9n,fcant Lass ' Issues and Supporting Information Sources PotenLally SigmM1Cant With MNganon Than Significant ~No Im act Inco ratetl I act I act Post- Construction Operational 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Duality Management Plan prepared by Kevin Kim of Nebs Home Development on November 11, 2005, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits. 7) Provide Roof Runoff Controls that include vegetated swales and foundation planting to maximize storm water infiltration and limit storm water from entering curb and gutters. The plants used shall be sturdy enough to tolerate heavy runoff, sheet flows and periodic soil saturation. 8) Construct vegetated swales to limit lot runoff from entering curb and gutters. All landscaping shall be maintained to insure the maximum infiltration of storm water. b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from ground water in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facdibes c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered significant • d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official C,D,E & F-42 Rev 5/24/06 Initial Study for SUBTPM17222 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 L¢ss Than Sign,ficanf Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pot¢naally S,grnficant won Md,gamn roan S,grnLCant , No I tt Incg rated I ael I an and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated e) The prolect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new bwlding and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The prolect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anbcipated , Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface watef quality impacts The site is for new development or significant redevelopment, therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 9) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP), including a prolect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 10) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected h) The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected I) There are no oceans, lakes or reservoirs near the prolect site, therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of Rev 5/24/06 C,D,E & F-43 Initial Study for SUBTPM17222 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 Less Then Sigmhcent lass ~ Polenaally With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sign,i wnt InMOigana~ S~gni aca^I I No the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the Clty and spreading grounds both within and north of the Crty 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the protect a) Physically divide an established community () () () (~) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or O O O (~) regulation of an agency with turisdiction over the protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, ' or zoning, specific plan, local coastal program, ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effects c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan O O U (~) or natural community conservation plan Comments: a) The site is located 100 feet north of Vrvero Street, on the east side of Carnelian Street and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north, south, east and west This protect will be of similar design and size to surrounding residential development to the north, south, east and west The protect will become a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated b) The protect site land use designation is Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan and does not intertere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The protect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the protect 10 . a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (~) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (~) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact C,D,E & F-44 Rev 5/24/06 ~~r • Initial Study for SUBTPM17222 City of Rancho Cucamonga i Page 20 ~~ Less Than ~ Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources P9emially S nrfmant 9,ih MRi aLOn 9 han S nAicant II No I pact Incor orated Im act Impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is nli impact 11. NOISE. Would the project result in a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ~ O (/) O ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne horse levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (/) levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () (/) () ( ) ambien4 noise levels in the protect vianity above levels existing without the protect e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, O O O (/) would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels Comments• a) The protect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out A Noise Study was completed on February 22, 2006 by Wieland Associates, Inc The study found that the outside noise levels as measured at the nearest rear yard to Carnelian Street was 74 dB, 9 d6 over the 60 d6 limit between 10 00 p m and 7 00 a m as outlined in the General Plan Exterior 1) Construct a 7-foot high wall at the top of slope and along the west property line along Carnelian Street and extending a minimum 30 feet along northeast property Ime and 20 feet along south west property line. Interior 2) Second floor window and door assemblies for residences facing Carnelian Street shall use sound-rated assemblies with outdoor-indoor transmission class (OITC) ratings Ratings of up to approximately 32 may be required. The actual OITC rating needed shall be determined as part of the final engineering design of the project Rev 5/24/06 C,D,E & F-45 Initial Study for SUBTPM17222 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 Less Tian SiprnhceM Less Potentially WiN Then Issues and Supporting Information Sources Signiecant M~oganon Sipmficent No 1 act Inco retetl I 1 3) All exterior walls shall be constructed using 5/8-loch gypsum wallboard on interior walls. , 4) All lots adtacent to Carnelian Street shall orient duct openings away from the street including HVAC systems, attic mounted equipment, bathroom fans, and dryer vents. 5) Attic vents shall not be placed on elevations facing Carnelian Street. If such an orientation cannot be avoided, then an acoustic baffle shall be placed in the attic space behind the vent. 6) Minimum 5/8-inch thick gypsum board or plaster ceiling shall be provided in upper floor rooms. 7) Skylights shall not be used on elevations facing Carnelian Street. b) The uses associated with this type of protect normally do not induce groundborne vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the protect d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, wdl generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 8) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6.30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. g) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified m Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02 120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 10) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be required • • Rev 5/24/06 C,D,E & F-46 C~ Initial Study for SUBTPM17222 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Less Than Sign,htant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Signtlicant With Mmganon Than Significant i No I act Inco rateE I act I aq 11) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport Located approximately 4 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport,'is located approximately 2-1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated L 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the pro/ecf a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either O O O (~) directly (for example, by proposing 'new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, O O O (~) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (`~) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments: a) The prolect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area No impacts are anticipated b) The prolect site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c) The prolect site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated • 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the profect result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental faaldtes, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance ob/ectives for any of the public services a) Flre protections O O O (~) b) Police protections O O O (~) c) Schools () () () (~) d) Parks () () () (~) Rev 5/24/06 C,D,E 8 F-47 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTPM17222 ~ ~ Page 23 Less Than ~ • Sgnificant Less Potemally Wnh Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sgndwm I Mo gar~atetl Sl9n'enn, ~ Han e) Other public factldies~ O O O ( ) Comments: a) wouldlbe served by0a f eetstat on ofcatedrapproxematelyhl m letfrolmethe p oleclt sde trThe prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard Conditions of Approval from the Uniform Bwlding and Fire Codes will be placed on the prolect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated , b) Additional police protection is not regwred as the addition of the prolect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and wdl not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the prolect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled c) The Central School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School Distract serve the prolect area Both school distracts have been notrfied regarding the proposed development A Standard Condition of Approval will require the developer to pay the School Impact Fees With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant . d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park, Red Hill Community Park, is located less than 1/4 mde east from the prolect site The prolect will not requre the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any , existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A Standard Condition of Approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticpated e) curerently servedroby thellCity of Ran~chopCulcamongas The prolect wal not requdirerthe ' construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the protected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Pian for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at bwld-out of the City • C,D,E & F-48 Rev 5/24/06 ,~ • r1 LJ C~ Initial Study for SUBTPM17222 City of Rancho Cucamonga I, Page 24 ~~ Less Than ~ Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potemially SigniOCant With Mifigafion Than Significant i 5Jo I act Inco oratetl Im aQ 1 act 14. RECREATION. Would the protect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (~) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational facilities or () () () (~) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park, Red Hill Community Park, is located less than 1/4 mile east of the protect site This protect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A Standard Condition of Approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated b) See a)response above 15. TRANSPORTATIONlfRAFFIC. Would the pro/ect a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in O O O (~) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e , result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (~) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including O O O (~) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (~) (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (~) f) Result in inadequate parking capacdy~ O O O (~) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs O O U (~) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments• a) Implementation of the proposed protect will generate 52 vehicle trips daily The proposed protect includes the development of four dwelling units The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Rev 5/24/06 C,D,E & F-49 City of Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study for Page 25 SUBTPM17222 Less Than Sign,ficant Lass Poternially Wnh Tha^ No • Issues and Supporting Information Sources S'gnita`nt I MolgaTatetl Slgnifi~eM f Model estimates that each dwelling unit will generate 1 two-way peak hour trips daily. As ued development wtll contribute to the t in noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), con area The proposed prolect is consistent with the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga eral Plan for which the FEIR was pt2pared and impacts evaluated The prolect is in G t en an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included m prolec bstantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, design The prolect will not create a su c volume or congestion at intersections The prolect site will be required to provde ff t i ra street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per tablished a Transportation City roadway standards In addition, the City has es ment Fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of Building Permits velo D ff p e ic Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate tra circulation No impacts are antiapated b) The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each dwelling amt will generate 4 n Bernardino County voters passed 04 S a , two-way peak hour trips daily In November 20 sure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on M ea the development for rhea fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects On ted a Comprehensive Transportation ado p May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Schedule updating these development impact fees As a result, the San Bernardino F ee ct Analys s eeportn g requ ementthThis prolect wllMbanaequ red, asaa 9l mpa (CMP) T affi condition of approval, to pay the adopted Transportation Development Fee prior to an area that is mostly developed with all t • is in issuance of Bwlding Permit The prolec treet improvements existing The prolect will not negatively impact the level of service s d s dewalk) alongthe str'eetbeontage of he sderoNoeimpaces a u c S an gutte rb mprovements (c are anticipated OnstaNo Amrpactsta a alMic paled t north of c) tt f h e p o o er pa traffic l not hinge a and w h e flight pa th ect is in an area that is mostly developed The prolect will be required to provide ro The Th l p d e ) street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. us intersections or farming d angero prolect design does not include any sharp curves or substantial increase in hazards because of t e a uses The prolect will, therefore, not crea a design feature No impacts are anticipated ccess aNoempacts are a ticipated d will, e) p m o or je emergency a adequate reate an not e heeef t creates an inadequate park ng a p d g rk e d rl d r f) no e , therefo w l and Code opment Deve onga Cucam capacity No impacts are anticipated g) The Prt° n and vehiclet npr~educt olln (e g c bustbays b cycle racks (carpool t rt sl eC o o a o trans n supp 9 P parking, etc) • C,D,E 8 F-50 Rev 5/24/06 • I-._.~ Initial Study for SUBTPM17222 City of Rancho Cucamonga I I Page 26 Less Than ~ Signifcani Less Potentially Wifi Than i~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources s~an~ra and InMQi9anareE S9n act I I Nect 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the pro/ect a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (~) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (`~) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (~) water drainage facilities or expansign of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects ~ ~~ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (~) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (~) provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted O O O ('~) capacity to accommodate the protect's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (~) regulations related to solid waste Comments a) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is required to meet the regwrements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated • c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits The impact is not considered significant d) The protect is served by the CVWD water system There currently is a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No impacts are anticipated Rev 5/24/06 C,D,E & F-51 Initial Study for SUBTPM17222 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 27 Less marl Signnmant Less Potentially With Then Issues and Supporting Information Sources Signs a~m InMO 9a2ted SgNficem No e) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located wthin Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated f) heldrefuse atdlapperm ttedblandrfilllw h suffhc entrcapacity to handledthe City's sol d waste disposal needs g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE 17 . a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the () () () (~) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually () () () (~) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively siderable" means that the incremental effects of a con ect are considerable when wowed in connection prot with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) Does the protect have environmental effects that will () () () (~) c) se substantial adverse effects on human beings, cau either directly or indirectly Comments. a) of Rancho Cuclamonga GeneraaPlan Exhibt V 3 glAdditionally, the adreatsurroundmgCthe site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site b) thehsiPeomsaccordtance wth Phe CtytofnRan ho IlCucamongabGenerae PlandevThe 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant • Rev 5/24/06 C,p,E & F-52 Initial Study for ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT17222 ~ ~ Page 28 • levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, ,no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is regwred c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed m an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses • were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) • Rev 5/24/06 C,D,E & F-53 Initial Study for SUBTT17222 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 29 I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no ~ g~ environmental effects would occur / ,f ~ ~„` Date ~ ~ I l r b Applicant's Signature ~I'~~ Pnnt Name and Title Yt u ~ I ~` sf { nr' ~ i~°1 ~ ' ` - i \plannmg\fmal\cegaMstudy pt u--7-04rev final doc i \planning\finaNOisMsludy pt ir081004rev finalwrking doc • C,D,E & F-54 Rev 5/24/06 r,~; i _ ~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Dec/arat~on is being circulated for public review m accordance with the Cal~forn~a Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Protect File No.. Tentatwe Parcel Map SUBTPM17222 Public Review Period Closes• June 28, 2006 ' Project Name: Project Applicant. Nebs Home Development Project Location (also see attached map). Located 100 feet north of Vwero Street, on the east side of Carnelian Street - APN 0207-551-73 ' Project Description. A subdivision of 0 92 acre of land into 4 lots in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Related Files DRC2005-01078 (average lot area Variance), DRC2006-00477 (wall height Variance), and DRC2005-01077 (wall height Minor Exception) FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the protect may have a significant effect on the envronment and is proposing this Mitigated Negatroe Declaration based upon the following finding The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect, as revised, may have a significant effect on th2 environment If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report wdl not be required The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included m the attached Initial Study The protect file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847 NOTICE The public is mulled to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the rewew period July 12 2006 Date of Determination Adopted By C,D,E & F-55 • RESOLUTION NO 06-61 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17222, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 0 92 ACRE OF LAND INTO 4 LOTS IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED 100 FEET NORTH OF VIVERO STREET, ON THE EAST SIDE OF CARNELIAN STREET, AT THE TERMINUS OF CANDLEWOOD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN 0207-551-73 A Rentals 1 Nebs Home Development filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17222, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 12th day of July 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speaficaliy finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public hearing on July 12, 2006, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located 100 feet north ofvvero Street, on the east side of Carnelian Street, at the terminus of Candlewood Avenue, and b The property is presently developed with asingle-family residence that is proposed for demolition, and c Single-family residences bound the site on the north, south, east, and west Carnelian Street runs parallel to the west property line and Candlewood Avenue terminates into the east property line of the protect site, and d The application is to subdivide approximately 0 92 acre of land into 4 parcels consisting of the following square footages, and • C,D,E & F-56 ' ~,.I , PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 06-61 SUBTPM17222 - NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT , July 12, 2006 . Page 2 Parcel 1 7,884 square feet Parcel 2 7,375 square feet Parcel 3 8,888 square feet Parcel 4 7 465'sguare feet Average Lot Size 7,903 square feet e A total of 26 trees currently exist on the site The applicant has flled,a Tree Removal Permit to remove all trees The included arbonst report states that only a group of nine Italian cypress trees are worthy of preservation These trees, though, are in conflict with the proposed location of cul-de-sac extension of Candlewood Avenue, and f All 4 lots will face a proposed cul-de-sac extension of Candlewood Avenue, and g The applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting on Apnl 14, 2006 at the Lions Center that was attended by nine residents , , 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and b The design or improvements of the Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speafic plans, and The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial envvonmental damage and avoidable intury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and e The Tentative Parcel Map is not likely to cause serious public health problems, and f The design of the Tentative Parcel Map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaralcation9the Plantning Commiss on fmdsthat thereas no sub tantial ev dente thatthe protect the app will have effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto m and incorporated herein by the reference, based upon the finding as follows a Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA")and the City's local p otQectGBaseldeon the find ngs po tamed m'thattln t alfSt dy~City staff dete mined thatcwith the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the protect would C,D,E & F-57 '~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 06-61 SUBTPM17222 - NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT • July 12, 2006 Page 3 have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration b The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before rt, finds (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared rn compliance with CEQA, and (u) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evrdenpe that the pro~ectwill have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission fuRherfinds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the ' Planning Commission Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration , c The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 and finds that,such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project d Pursuant to the regwrements of California Fish and Game Code Section 711 4 and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 753 5, the Planning Commission finds, based • on the Initial Study, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and considering the record as a whole, that there rs no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends This rs supported by the fact that the site is presently developed with asingle-family home, has walls surrounding the entire lot and rs surrounded by existing development on all sides Based on substantial evidence, the Planning Commission hereby makes a declaration rebutting the presumption of adverse effect as set forth rn California Department of Fish and Game Regulation 753 5 (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Code, Section 753 5 ) e The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) Approval of Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00289 is hereby granted for the removal of 26 trees of various species as outlined in the Arborrst report The Trees shall be replaced on aone-for-one basis with 24- • inch box size trees C,D,E & F-58 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 06-61 SUBTPM17222 - NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT July 12, 2006 Page 4 , 2) Approval is also granted for a Minor Exception to,allow a maximum calculated wall height of 8 feet along the north and south property lines 3) All perimeter walls shall be constructed of decorative block and the free standing portion of the walls shall be 6 feet in height and have a uniform design compatible to those in the area, to the satisfaction of the Planning Director Enaineering Department 1) Carnelian Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Secondary Street" standards as required and including a) No driveway to Carnelian Avenue b) Remove existing drive approach and install curb and gutter c) Provide street fights, street trees, traffic stnping and signage, as required , C~ d) Remove the diagonal block walls and replace with new ones to align with the straight existing block walls e) Revise City Drawing 1286 Sheets 1, 4, 8, and 11 to reflect above required improvements including ungation system ' 2) Candlewood Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Local Street" standards as required and including a) Provide a c pavement, curb and gutter, property line adtacent sidewalk, street lights, street trees, dnve approaches, traffic striping and signage, as required b) The cul-de-sac bulb shall be per City Standard 111 The acceptable proposed sidewalk shall be curb adtacent along the south side of Lot 1 dnve approach and the sidewalk shall transition from back of the drive approach with a 5-foot sidewalk easement up to the easterly property boundary of Lot 4 This will create a 5-foot or 6-foot parkway between curb face and sidewalk The portion at the back of the proposed curb adtacent sidewalk of Lot 1, lust west of Lot 99 of Tract 9157 shall be rockscaped to City Standards 3) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 KV electrical) on the protect side of Carnelian Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole offsite of the westerly protection of the southerly protect boundaryto the first pole offsite of the • westerly protection of the northerly protect boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first All C,D,E & F-59 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 06-61 SUBTPM17222 - NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT • July 12, 2006 Page 5 services crossing Carnelian Avenue shall be undergrounded as well The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all nghts of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate 4) The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) submitted with tentative map application has been reviewed and found to be substantially complete Include the Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the plan on grading plans when submitted for technical plan check Environmental Mitigation Measures Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and • maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 2) Pnor to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, orthat their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed bythe South CoastAir Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand orhigh-volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads C,D,E & F-60 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 06-61 SUBTPM17222 - NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT July 12, 2006 ' Page 6 Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility,of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time Schedule activities to minimize the ~ amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Suspend grading operations during high winds (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means • 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with . SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric orclean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipmentwhen not in use 10) All residential and commercal structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stepping Biological Resources 1) The developer shall submit a tree replacement Landscape Plan pnorto issuance of Grading Permits The plan shall include replacement with at least 25 trees, in minimum 24-inch box size, and may include street • trees and other front yard trees Actual planting should occur prior to final occupancy of residences on these lots C,D,E & F-6t ''4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 06-61 SUBTPM17222 - NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT . July 12, 2006 Page 7 Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from ' demolition or significant modification without an opporturnty for the City to establish its archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to requve incorporation of archaeological sties within new developments, using theirspecial qualities as a theme or focal point ,Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on sigmficant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdehnes Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy ofthe completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) If any paleontological resources (i e , plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped, to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the momtor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately droert construction and notify the monitor of the find C,D,E & F-62 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 06-61 SUBTPM17222 - NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT July 12, 2006 Page 8 , Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i a ,San BernaYdino County Museum) Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions assoaated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary'depending upon time of year of construction , 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such episodes ' l~J 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented forthe proposed protect that identifies speafic measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are radiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site, as a result of this protect, will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a speafied time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff C,D,E & F•63 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 06-61 SUBTPM17222 - NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT July 12, 2006 • Page 9 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning wdl be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site 5) The developer shall implement the Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Kevin Kim of Nebs Home Development on November 11, 2005, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval pnor to the issuance of grading permts 7) Provide Roof Runoff Controls that include vegetated swales and foundation planting it maximize storm water infiltration and limit storm . water from entering curb and gutters The plants used shall be sturdy enough to tolerate heavy runoff, sheet flows and periodic 8) Construct vegetated swales to limit lot runoff from entering curb and gutters All landscaping shall be maintained to insure the maximum infiltration of storm water 9) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WOMP, including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 10) Pnor to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Offiaal for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit r1 t• J C,D,E & F-64 ' "~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 06-61 SUBTPM17222 - NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT , July 12, 2006 Page 10 • Noise 1) Construct a 7-foot high wall at the top of slope and along the west property line along Carnelian Street and extending a minimum 30 feet along northeast property line and 20 feet along south west property line 2) Second floor window and door assemblies for' residences facing Carnelian Street shall use sound-rated assemblies with outdoor-indoor transmission class (OITC) ratings Ratings of up to approximately 32 maybe required The actual OITC rating needed shall be determined as part of the final engineering design of the project The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase 3) Ali exteriorwalls shall be constructed using 5/8-vlch gypsum wallboard on interior walls , 4) All Igts adtacent to Carnelian Street shall orient duct openings away from the street including HVAC systems, attic mounted equipment, bathroom fans and dryer vents 5) Attic vents shall not be placed on elevations facing Carnelian Street If • such an orientation cannot be avoided, then an acoustic baffle shall be placed in the attic space behind the vent 6) Minimum 5/8-inch thick gypsum board or plaster ceiling shall be ~~ provided in upper floor rooms 7) Skylights shall not be used on elevations facing Carnelian Street 8) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 9) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards speafied in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Budding Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Offical within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Budding Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 10) The perimeter block walls shall be constructed as early as possible in • the first phase C,D,E & F-65 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 06-61 SUBTPM17222 - NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT July 12, 2006 • Page 11 11) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, ~f heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily taps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF JULY 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman • ATTEST James R Troyer, Secretary I, James R Troyer, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting ofthe Planning Commission held on the 12th day of July 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~1 LJ C,D,E & F-66 I'1, ' City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Protect File No.: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17222 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the fgllowing elements. 1 the prolcedure npecressaryto ensure comp) an'cetThe mit gat on measure condi ons of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2. A procedure of compliance and venfication has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action wtll be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program , Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 correspo deng rtmntgig torn measure PdePtif ed inrthe Mit gat onnl Mon tonng Check stctattached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Ciwc Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 C,D,E & F-67 Mitigation Monitoring Program TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17222 • Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the prolect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the prolect planner 4. the prolect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring wdl be signed off as completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. , 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The prolect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with anyaspects of the MMP is not occurring afterwntten notification has been issued The prolect planner or responsible City department also has the • authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after prolect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required penod of time In those instances regwring long-term prolect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the prolect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits u C,D,E 8 F-68 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: SUBTPM17222 Applicant: Nebs Home Development Initial Study Prepared by: Tabe van der Zwaag, Assistant Planner Date: June 1 2006 Air Quality All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the CP/BO developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction n b in rr a C C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Review of plans C 2 equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Plannin staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAOMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or hi h-volume, low- ressure s ra All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards BO B Revew of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAOMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAOMD BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall - include the followin rowsions 2/4 • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans A/C through seeding and watering 1 of 9 • • • - -. .. • -Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads BO C Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated sod during and after the end of work periods Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of n construction Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , BO C During A 4 m ~ wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction n SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements V ~ Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction swtable means The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During - A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and construction Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to - reduce PM, emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans A/C 4 alternative fuel- owered e w ment where feasible _ - The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work - crews will shut off egwpment when not in use 2 of 9 .. .. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C 2/4 required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heatin , air conditionin , a liances, and water heaters All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C 2/4 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stri in Biological Resources The developer shall submit a tree replacement CP B Review of plans C 2 Landscape Plan prior to issuance of Grading Permits The plan shall include replacement with at least 26 trees, in minimum 24 inch box size, and may include street trees and other front yard trees Actual planting should occur prior to final occupancy of residences on these lots Cultural Resources If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developerwdl - retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites CP/BO C Review of report A/D - 3/4 from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point Pursue educating the public about the area's CPBO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Revew of report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect - effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines - - n 0 m m ~9 Prepare a technical resources management report, CP documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Intormation Center for permanent archiving if any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or durmg grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i a ,paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures n 0 m w T V N CP C A/D 3/4 Review of report Review of report Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activties CP B Review of report - A/D 4 Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or BO B/C Review of A/D 4 graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until report - the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for CP D Review of D 3 documentation in the summary report and transfer to an report _ appropriate depository (i e , San Bernardino County Museum) 4 of 9 n 0 m w J W .. -. . - -. .. Geolo and Soils The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizeg agent (approved by SCAOMD and construction RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of ear of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction from the site durin such a isodes Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, - Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 5 of 9 • • i ~ ~ . .. . . .. . . . An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing -- ot grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or oft-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specfied time frame During construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 ~ sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent - - bdischarge of debris or sediment from the site when there - rn is rainfall or other runoff ' w T During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/DB/C/D Review of A/CA/C 2/42/4 a cleaning wdl be pertormed pnor to storm events and piansReview of - after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to plans prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site The developer shall implement the Best Management CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 Practices (BMPs) identified in the Water Quality - Management Plan prepared by Kevin Kim of Nebs Home Development on November 11, 2005, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minim¢ing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Pians for = these areas, including mondonng provisions fora minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for - _ review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading - Permds 6of9 . - .. Provide Roof Runoff Controls that include vegetated BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 swales and foundation planting it maximize storm water infiltration and limit storm water from entering curb and gutters The plants used shall be sturdy enough to tolerate heavy runoff, sheet flows and periodic Construct vegetated swales to limit lot runoff from BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 entering curb and gutters All landscaping shall be maintained to insure the maximum mfdtration of storm water Prior to issuance of Bwlding Permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water ~ Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect i description and identifying Best Management Practices ° (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into ,", the storm drain system to the maximum extent " practicable The WQMP shall identifythe structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant BO B/C/D Revew of plans A/C 214 shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Budding Official for coverage underthe NPDES General Construction Permit Noise - Construct a 7-foot high wall at the top of slope and along CP B Review of plans C 2 the west property line along Carnelian Street and extending a minimum 30 feet along northeast property line and 20 feet alon south west roe line 7 of 9 .. Second floor window and door assemblies for CP B Review of plans C - 2 residences facing Carnelian Street shall use sound- ratedassemblies with outdoor-indoor transmission class (OITC ratings of up to approximately 32 may be required The actual OITC rating needed shall be determined as part of the final engineering design of the protect All exterior walls shall be constructed using 5/8-inch CP B Review of plans C 2 sum wallboard on interior walls All lots adjacent to Carnelian Street shall orient duct CP B Review of plans C 2 openings away from the street including HVAC systems, attic mounted egwpment, bathroom fans and dryer vents ~- Attic vents shall not be placed on elevations facing CP B Review of plans C 2 ,Carnelian Street If such an orientation cannot be avoided, then an acoustic baffle shall be placed in the - ~ attics ace behind the vent Minimum 5/8-inch thick gypsum board or plaster ceding CP B Revew of plans - C 2 shall be rovided m u er floor rooms - Skylights shall not be used on elevations facing CP B Review of plans C 2 Carnelian Street Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A _ 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction' including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 8of9 0 m sp T J -. -. .. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report then findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official Ii noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A A as ossible in the first hose construction - Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO C During A 4/7 - hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, - construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for - hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass _ sensitive land uses or residential dwellln s Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification Sanctions CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Pnor To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Budding Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Bwlding Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 - Cdabon - i \planning\final\cega\mmchklst-rev1-05final doc 9 of 9 • COMMUNI~TY~ DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBTPM17222 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICANT: NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: 7539 CARNELIAN STREET ' ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. ~. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The appllcant shall reimburse the City Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, Its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at Its own expense In the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve appllcant of his obhgahons under this condition 2 Approval of Tentative Parcel Map Tract No 17222 is granted subject to the approval of Variance DRC2005-01078, Variance DRC2006-00477, and Variance DRC2006-00519 B. Time Limits 1 This tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map Is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained In accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file In the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations 2 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be • submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits SC-1-OS 1 Completion Date -~-~- ~ ~ / / I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpl\SUBTPM'i7222' C,D,E & F-7$p Protect No SUBTPM17222 Comolehon Date 3 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street Improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, , _/_/_ building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved • use has commenced, whichever comes first 4 Approval of this request shall not waive comPlable Commlun t tior S echficDPlans m effect at thel p y P and a s d O / / p , inance r other applicable City time of building permit issuance 5 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 6 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property ther means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape ' _/_/_ association, or o owner, homeowners maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of bwldmg permds 7 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the pro/ect perimeter If a double wall _/_/_. condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the ad/otning roperty owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mall, all contiguous property ' p s owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the protect perimeter D. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping In shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and nt l _/_/_- , opme the case of residential deve submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision . 2 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion ection shall include a permanent Irrigation system to be th d b is s y control Slope planting require installed by the developer prior to occupancy 3 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater _/_I_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size f ll , ows o shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or s and shrubs shall be planted In T ree larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold d thrmn lth _/_/_ g y an maintained in a hea and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 5 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _I_I_ perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 6 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of _/_/_. Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code r1 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM172, doc C,D,E & F-7E 'y, , Protect No SUBTPM77222 Comoletion Date ~E. Environmental 1 Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation _/-/- measures Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on-and off-site A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to final occupancy release The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA 2 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the -/-/- issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation f to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and i appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report 3 The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of -/-I- the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards Certification shall be artment prior to final occupancy release of the affected De fet & S ld p y a ing submitted to the Bui homes LICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, APP FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) F. General Requirements • _/_/_ 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Protect Number (i e , SUBTPM17222) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report -/-/- Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to -/-/- the City pnor to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls -/-/- 5 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can -/-/- contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM172~ C,D,E & F-8C doc \ Protect No SUBTpM17222 Completion Date G. Site Development ~ 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be SUBTPM17222) The applicant shall comply with the • _~_~ marked with the protect file number (i e , latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in artment for De t f d , p e y Sa effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building an availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and appllcable handouts 2 Prior to Issuance of building permits for a new residential prolect or mayor addition, the applicant but are not limited to Such fees May include t d _~_~_ , ra e shall pay development fees at the establishe Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Cit y str( PlanCheck oflthe Dhoolifeesr~eceiptdto the B uldmg and Safety d opy ovide a licant shall Fees App P Department prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map _~_~_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits , 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _~_~_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays H. New Structures , 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBrr) for property Ilne clearances _~_~_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations _~_~-. 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions I_/_ _ • I. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, Clty Grading The final grading plan shall be in substantial t _~-7- ices Standards, and accepted grading prac conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A Bolls report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to ~_~_- perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _~_~._ time of application for grading plan check 4 norrto the issuance of bulliding Offi calc t f S a r a r n / / p y e nd a e Bu Id ng oved by h pp d subm fled, a permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for roposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of bein t _~_~_ g p s existing buildings where improvemen combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer r~ 11PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM172 ~ doc C,D,E & F-81 RESOLUTION NO 06-62 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2005-01078, A REQUEST TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED AVERAGE LOT AREA FROM 8,000 SQUARE FEET TO 7,903 SQUARE FEET FOR A 4 LOT SUBDIVISION ON 0 92 ACRE OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED 100 FEET NORTH OF VIVERO STREET, ON THE EAST SIDE OF CARNELIAN STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN 0207-551-73 A Recitals 1 Nebs Home Development filed an application for the approval of Variance DRC2005-01078, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 12th day of July 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date All legal prerequisites prior to the adgption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on July 12, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located 100 feet north of Vivero Street, on the east side of Carnelian Street, at the terminus of Candlewood Avenue, and The property is currently developed with asingle-family residence, and c Single-family residences on similar sized lots bound the site on the north, south, and east Carnelian Street comprises the sites west property line and Candlewood Avenue dead-ends into the sites east property line, and d The proposed Variance would reduce the requued 8,000 square foot average lot size requirement by 93 square feet Without a reduction in the average lot area requirement the applicant would have to subdivide the site into fewer lots that in turn would be much largerthan the majority of existing lots m the surrounding area, which would be inconsistent with the intent of the • Development Code, and e All four lots will face a proposed cul-de-sac extension of Candlewood Avenue C,D,E & F-82 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No 06-62 VARIANCE DRC2005-01078 - NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT July 12, 2006 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng~ the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the obtectives of the Development Code Without a reduction in the lot area requirement the applicant would have to subdivide the site into fewer lots that in turn would be much larger than the ma~onty of existing lots in the surrounding area, which would be inconsistent with the intent of the Development Code, and b There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the Low Residential Distnct The applicant is subdividing a lot that is surzounded by lots that were subdivided at a much earlier date, which has placed constrains on the access and development of the lot that can only be overcome in one of two ways 1) By subdivding the site into larger lots that are out a character to the surrounding area, or 2) By reduang the 8,000 square foot average lot area requirement by 94 square feet and creating lots that are substantially similar in size and character to the surrounding lots, and ICJ c The stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enfoyed by the owners of other properties in the Low Residential District Without the reduction in the average lot area regwrement, the site would have to be • subdivided into lots that are larger in size and out of character to the lots in the surrounding neighborhood, and d The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of speaal pnvdege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the Low Residential District The applicant is requesting to subdivide the site into lots that are at a similar density to the other lots in the surrounding area, and e The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity The newly created lots will be indistingwshable from the surrounding lots other than being on average 94 square feet smaller in size than the 8,000 square foot lot average requirement 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto m and incorporated herein by the reference, based upon the finding as follows a Pursuant to the California Enwronmental Quality Act ("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, wdh the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the protect would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative • Declaration was prepared Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration C,D,E & F-83 '+~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No 06-62 VARIANCE DRC2005-01078 - NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT ,~ • July 12, 2006 Page 3 b The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds (i) that the Mitigated Negatrve Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA, and (u) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent tudgment and analysis of the Planning Commission Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration ' c The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 and finds that sugh Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project „ d Pursuant to the requirements of California Fish and Game Code Section 711 4 and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 753 5, the Planning Commission finds, based on the Initial Study, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and considering the record as a whole, that there is no evidence before the City that the proposed protect will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends This is supported by the fact that the site is presently developed with a single family home, has walls surrounding the entire • lot and is surrounded by existing development on all sides Based on substantial evidence, the Planning Commission hereby makes a declaration rebutting the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in California Department of Fish and Game Regulation 753 5 (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Code, Section 753 5 ) e The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below Planning Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at • its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve the applicant of his obligations underthis condition C,D,E & F-84 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No 06-62 VARIANCE DRC2005-01078 - NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT July 12, 2006 Page 4 2) Variance approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF JULY 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST James R Troyer, Secretary . I, James R Troyer, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of July 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS r~ LJ C,D,E & F-85 RESOLUTION NO 06-63 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2006-00477, A REQUEST TO INCREASE THE PERMITTED WALL HEIGHT ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE OF A PROPOSED 4-LOT SUBDIVISION BY A MAXIMUM 3 FEET IN ORDER TO ATTENUATE TRAFFIC NOISE FROM CARNELIAN STREET, IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PERACRE), LOCATED 100 FEET NORTH OF VIVERO STREET, ON THE EAST SIDE OF CARNELIAN STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN 0207-551-73 A Recitals 1 Nebs Home Development filed an application for the approval of Variance DRC2006-00477, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 12th day of July 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearng on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on July 12, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application apples to property located 100 feet north of Vivero Street, on the east side of Carnelian Street, at the terminus of Candlewood Avenue, and b The property is currently developed with asingle-family residence, and c Single-family residences bound the site on the north, south, and east Carnelian Street comprises the west property line of the site and Candlewood Avenue dead-ends into the east property line of the site, and d The proposed Variance would increase the maximum permitted wall height of 6 feet by an additional 3 feet along the west property line m order to construct combination retaining/garden walls The acoustical analysis for the proposed four lot subdivision indicates the need for 7-foot high sound attenuation walls to mitigate for traffic noise from Carnelian Street The 7-foot high property Ime walls will be on top of 2-1/2-foot to 3-foot high retaining walls . 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows C,D,E & F-86 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No 06-63 DRC2006-00477 - NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT July 12, 2006 ' , Page 2 • a The strict or literal interpretatios al hardsh a nconsf stentpw th therobte fives of the result in practical difficulty or unnecessary phy P proposed lots wou Id be sub~ect~ed to traffic noise m excessl of th t whiches perm tt d in the City's General Plan, and ' b There are exceptional or extraordinary arcumstances or conditions applicable to , the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the Low Residential District in that the proposed lots border Carnelian Streetwhich the City's General Plan has designated to be within an existing noise contour that is above the maximum noise level permitted for residentially zoned property, and c The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the speafied regulation would deprave the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the Residential Low District Without the additional wall height, the future property owners of the proposed lots would be subjected to noise level in excess of other residents in the same distract, and d The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special pnvilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties m the Low Residential District The proposed walls will reduce the noise level on the subject lots to a level consistent with the General Plan and enjoyed by the other homeowners in the surrounding area, and e The granting of the Vanance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially m~unous to properties or improvements in the vicinity The additional height of the subtect wall wdl be most apparent to the future homeowner 9 P the p~oposed lots and will not otherwise affect the health, safety and welfare of the surroundin roe owners 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto m and incorporated herein by the reference, based upon the finding as follows a Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration b The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA, and (u) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the pro~ectwill have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission furtherfinds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration C,D,E & F-87 ~~I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No 06-63 DRC2006-00477 - NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT July 12, 2006 ~~ • Page 3 c The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 and finds that the Mitigation Monitoring Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during the implementation of the protect The Planning Commission, therefore, adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the protect d Pursuant to the requirements of California Fish and Game Code Section 711 4 and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 753 5, the Planning Commission finds, based on the Initial Study, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and considering the record as a whole, that there is no evidence before the City that the proposed protect will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends This is supported by the fact that the site is presently developed with asingle-family home, has walls surrounding the entire lot, and is surrounded by existing development on all sides Based on substantial evidence, the Planning Commission hereby makes a declaration rebutting the presumption of adverse effect as set forth m California Department of Fish and Game"Regulation 753 5 (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Code, Section 753 5 ) e The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring" Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Those documents are available for public review m the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, . California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below Planning Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternatwe, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve the applicant of his obligations underthis condition 2) Variance approval shall expire if Bwldmg Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution C C,D,E & F-88 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No 06-63 DRC2006-00477 - NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT July 12, 2006 Page 4 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF JULY 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST James R Troyer, Secretary I, James R Troyer, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of July 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • • • C,D,E & F-89 ,,~ C~ RESOLU~`ION NO 06-64 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2006-00519, A REQUEST TO DECREASE •THE 40 FOOT MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE WIDTH REQUIREMENTAS MEASURED AT THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE BY 20 FEET, FOR ONE LOT OF A 4 LOT SUBDIVISION IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED 100 FEET NORTH OF VIVERO STREET, ON THE EAST SIDE OF CARNELIAN STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN 0207-551- 73 A Recitals 1 Nebs Home Development filed an application for the approval of Variance DRC2006- 00519, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the apphcaUon " „ 2 On the 12th day of July 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date " All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred • B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows '~ 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on July 12, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application applies to property located 100 feet north of Vivero Street, on the east side of Carnelian Street, at the terminus of Candlewood Avenue, and The property is currently developed with asingle-family residence, and • c Single-family residences bound the site on the north, south, east, and west Carnelian Street is parallel to the sites west property line and Candlewood Avenue dead-ends into the sites east property line, and d The proposed Variance would decrease the street frontage requirement from 40 feet to 20 feet The Variance is made necessary because of the alignment of the cul-de-sac that the subdivision will take access from and the fact that the City's Engineering Department has a policy against single-family residences taking access off of Carnelian Street, an arterial street The cul-de- sac runs adtacent to the southern property line, which negates the possibility that houses can front this portion of the street This area is available for vehicle parking The lot in question meets the C,D,E & F-90 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No 06-64 DRC2006-0519 - NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT July 12, 2006 • Page 2 minimum lot width requirement as measured at the 37 foot front yard setback 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunhg the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code The Development Code requires that lots in the Low Residential District have a minimum street frontage of 40 feet The intent of which is to give each lot adequate area to provide street parking and landscaping and so that the streetscape is not dominated by driveways The lot in question quickly widens from the front property line and meets the minimum lot width requirement as measured at the minimum front yard setback Without approval of the Variance, the site would have to be developed with fewer lots that are substantially larger than the lots in the surrounding area, and b There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district, in that the surrounding lots were developed as part of a larger tract which has placed limitations on access to the applicant's site The proposed site is a small infill development which must take access off an existing cul-de-sac that currently dead-ends into the east property line of the site The cul-de-sac is aligned with the site's southern property line which negates houses fronting onto a large portion of the end of the cul-de-sac This necessitates that three houses share half the remaining radius of the cul-de-sac The site is also bordered by a second street which the General Plan designates as a Mayor Arterial road, the City's Engineering Department has a policy against residential developments having driveway access onto arterial streets, and c The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the Low Residential District This would requve the applicant to develop the site at a lower density than outlined in the City's General Plan for the Low Residential District This would result in lots that are out of character with the lots m the surrounding area, and d The granting of the Vanance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified m the same zoning district The proposed lot meets all other Development Code regwrements except for the street frontage requirement and that the lot is similar in character to the surrounding lots, and e The granting of the Vanance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity The reduction in the street frontage requirement will mostly affect the owner of the lot in question, will be of similar character to the surrounding lots and will not affect the health, safety and welfare of the surrounding property owners 4 Based upon the facts and information contained m the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included forthe envvonmental assessmentfor • the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence thatthe protect C,D,E & F-91 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No 06-64 DRC2006-0519 - NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT • July 12, 2006 Page 3 wdl have effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto m and incorporated herein by the reference, based upon the finding as follows a Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the protect Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the proteot would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment penod and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration b The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and, based on the whole record before it, finds (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared incompliance with CEQA, and (u) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration c The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project d Pursuant to the requrements of California Fish and Game Code Section 711 4 and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 753 5, the Planning Commission finds, based on the Initial Study, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and considering the record as a whole, that there is no evidence before the City that the proposed protect will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends This is supported by the fact that the site is presently developed with a single family home, has walls surrounding the entire lot and is surrounded by existing development on all sides Based on substantial evidence, the Planning Commission hereby makes a declaration rebutting the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in California Department of Fish and Game Regulation 753 5 (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Code, Section 753 5 ) e The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, • this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below C,D,E & F-92 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No 06-64 DRC2006-0519 - NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT July 12, 2006 • Page 4 Plamm~g Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his,sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve the applicant of his obligations under this condition 2) Vanance approval shall expire if Bwlding Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF JULY 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST James R Troyer, Secretary I, James R Troyer, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting ofthe Planning Commission held on the 12th day of July 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS C,D,E & F-93 r • T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE July 12, 2006 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commisslon FROM: James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Lols Schrader, Planning Commisslon Secretary ' SUBJECT ELECTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION OFFICERS BACKGROUND The Planning Commisslon Administrative Regulations provide for electron of Chairman and Vice Chairman in July of each year RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission should elect a Chairman and Vlce Chairman to serve for one-year terms Respectfully submitted ~' ~ Ja s R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT/LS Is • ITEM G I ~PLANNING~FINAL~PLNGCOMM~2006 Res 8 Stf RptIPC Ofc Stf Rpl 07-06 doc T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE July 12, 2006 TO' Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FRONt James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director gy Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary ' SUBJECT DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE~APPOINTMENTS BACKGROUND The Commission normally reviews Design Review Committee membership at least once a year It is now time to review Committee membership . Commissioners McPhail and Stewart currently serve on the Committee RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission should determine appropriate membership for the Design Review Committee Respectfully submitted, ~ ~,~ Jam R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT LS Is • ITEM H DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP July 2003 to present Apnl 2003 to present January 1999 to present January 1993 to Present COMMITTEE CnsUne McPhail Pam Stewart ALTERNATES in order ' Larry McNiel Pam Stewart Larry McNiel Pam Stewart September 1998 to January 1999 Rich Macas Larry McNiel January 1997 to September 1998 Bill Bethel Ricci Macias August 1996 to January 1997 Rich Macias Larry McNiel January 1996 to August 1996 Heinz Lumpp Larry McNiel Auoust 1995 to January 1996 Heinz Lumpp John Melcher December 1994 -Auoust 1995 Hemz Lumpp Larry McNiel June 1994 -December 1994 Heinz Lumpp John Melcher December 1993 -June 1994 Larry McNiel John Melcher October 1993 -December 1993 Larry McNiel John Melcher January 1993 -October 1993 John Melcher Wendy Vallette John Mannenno Rich Macias Peter Tolstoy Peter Tolstoy' Peter Tolstoy Dave Barker Larry McNiel Bill Bethel Peter Tolstoy Dave Barker Peter Tolstoy Dave Barker John Melcher Dave Barker Peter Tolstoy Larry McNiel Peter Tolstoy Dave Barker John Melcher Peter Tolstoy Larry McNiel Dave Barker Peter Tolstoy Hemz Lumpp Dave Barker Peter Tolstoy Suzanne Chitiea Wendy Vallette Peter Tolstoy Suzanne Chitiea Larry McNiel • H-2 ~~ • STAFF MEMBERSHIP OF DRC July 2005 Dan Coleman July 2004 Nancy Fong July 2003 Nancy Fong July 2002 Dan Coleman July 2001 Nancy Fong Jan 2001 Larry Henderson Jan 2000 Dan Coleman July 1999 Nancy Fong Jan 1999 Larry Henderson Jan 1998 Nancy Fong July 1997 Dan Coleman Jan 1997 Din Coleman July 1996 Nancy Fong Jan 1996 Larry Henderson July 1995 Nancy Fong H-3 ,, Planning Commission Meeting of ~~' /~~`"~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN-UP SHEET Please print your name, address, and city and indicate the item you have spoken regarding Thank you NA~ ADDRESS CITY 1 /J~ -G' 2 ~ ~l'~I /X~fZ~s 4 ~f/ /~, ~~vtOu /2 5 ~~~~(5iT 4~~ ~ IJ l-~ IG ~ ~ C~i~Z ~~ ~D 2~ C.L tJ D ~~_ W D t~ 17 S`j ~ r. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ~ 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 ITEM ~~