Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006/08/09 - Agenda Packet • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA , PLANNING COMMISSION T AGENDA RANCHO ' AUGUST 9, 2006. - 7:00 PM CUCAMONGA Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California ' ' I. CALL TO ORDER ,, Roll Call Chairman Stewart_ Vice Chairman Fletcher _ Macias _ McPhail _ Munoz _ II. ~ ANNOUNCEMENTS . AEPROVAL o~ MINUTES ' , IIh , July 26, 2006 Regular Meeting IV: CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar~tems are expected to be routine and non-controversial They wtll be acted on by the Commission at one bins wdhout discussion If anyone has concern over any item, d should be removed for discussion A MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-00764 - ENTREPRENEURAL RESTAURANTS CORPORATION - A request to modify the operating hours of a previously approved Las Campanas restaurant and bar, located within the Industnal Park (IP) Distract, Subarea 7, at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue Currently, the approved hours of operation are 11 00 a m to 10 00 p m (Sunday through Thursday) and 11 00 a m to 11 00 p m (Fnday and Saturday) The proposed hours of operation are 11 00 a m to 1 of 6 ~, , PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA AUGUST 9, 2006 ~~~ CUCAMONOA ~, 12 00 midnight (Sunday through Thursday) and 11 00 aim to 1 00 a m (Fnday and Saturday) -APN 0229-011-69. Related files Development Review DRC2004-01125 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17426 On August 25, 2005, a Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning ' Commission for Development Review DRC2004-01125. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent protects or minor revisions to protects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration ~~~~V~rt ~ 1Z4 ~ ~ } ._ The following dems are public heanngs in which concerned ~nd~wduals may voce their opinion of the related project Please wad to be recognrzed by the Chapman and address the Commission by stating your name and addmss All such op~mons shall be , I~m~ted to 5 minutes per ~nd~v~dual for each pro/ect Please sign ~n after speaking B ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE, TRACT MAP SUBTT17919 - ELBA INC - A request to subdivide 9 85 acres of land into 50 lots m the Low-Medium Residential D~stnct (4-8 dwelling unts per acre), ' located at the northwest corner of Miller and East Avenues -APN 1100- 081-03, 04 and O6 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17651 - TAVA DEVLOPMENT COMPANY -A request to subdivide 41 acres of land into 56 single-family lots within the Very Low Residential Distract (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located on the south side of Banyan Street, approximately 1,220 feet east of East Avenue -APN. 0225-191- , 012 Related File' Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00174 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. D ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17594 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to subdivide 8 21 acres of land into six parcels for commercial purposes m the Community Commercial Distract (Subarea 4) within the Foothill Boulevard Distracts, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue -APN 0227-152-18 and 31 Related Files. Preliminary Review DRC2004-00874, Conditional Use Permit DRC2005- 00365, General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01000, Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-01002, Development Code Amendment • • 2 of 6 ''t n LJ • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA AUGUST 9, 2006 ~CHO ~ COCAMONOA ~ ~ ' DRC2005-01003, General Plan Amendment DRCz005-01006 and Vanance DRC2005-01124. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration E ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-00365 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -The development of a master plan for an office and commercal center consisting of a 112 room hotel, two restaurant pad buildings totaling 10,893 square feet, a two-story office and retail building totaling 46,000 square feet, a bank and office building totaling 6,583 square feet and gas station with sonvernence store and food court totaling 8,189 square feet on 8 21 acres of land in the Community Commercial Distract (Subarea 4)' within the Foothill Boulevard Districts, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue -APN 0227-152-18 and 31 Related Files , Preliminary Review DRC2004-00874, ' Tentatwe Parcel Map SUBTPM17594, General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01000, Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-01002, Development Code Amendment DRC2005-01003, General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006 and Vanance DRC2005-01124 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative , Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration F ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 2005-01124 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to allow a maximum ' building height of 54 feet where a maximum building height of 45 feet is allowed for the development of a master plan for an office and commercial center consisting of a 112 room hotel, two restaurant pad buildings totaling 10,893 square feet, atwo-story office and retail building totaling 46,000 square feet, a bank and office buldng totaling 6,583 square feet and gas ' station with convenience store and food court totaling 8,189 square feet on 8 21 acres of land in the Community Commercial Distract (Subarea 4) within the Foothill Boulevard Distracts, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue -APN 0227-152-18 and 31 Related Files Preliminary Review DRC2004-00874, Tentatwe Parcel Map SUBTPM17594, Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365, General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01000, Development District Amendment DRC2005-01002, Development Code Amendment DRC2005-01003, and General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration 3 of 6 l~` I 1 ' PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA I AUGUST 9, 2006 ' 1 ~ANCHO cUCAMONGA G DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2006-00576 - ,CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to Section,l7 02 110 -Public Hearings and Notification requirements This action is exempt from , environmental review pursuant to Section 15061 of the State CEQA Guidelines This item will be forvvarded to the City Council for final action and the date of the Public Hearing before the City Councl wdl be separately noticed VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS This ~s the time and place for the general public to address the Commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda ' VII. COMMISSION BUSINESS VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administretive Regulations that set an 11 00 p m ' adloumment time If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only wdh the consent of the Comm~ss~on 1, Lois J Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certrfy that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on August 3, 2006, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga • • 4of6 ''I • • ~ I PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA AUGUST 9, 2006 RANCHO G'tACAMONnA 1 ' If you need special assistance or accommodations to p'articip9te in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 ' ements to hours poor to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arreng ® i ensure accessibilrty Listening devices are available for the heanng impaired INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC ' TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planting Commission encourages free expression of all points of view To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the brews of your entire group To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience The public may address the Plamm~g Commission on any agenda item To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium IocattYd at the center of the staff table State your name for the record and speak into the microphone After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you~may do so under "Public ' Comments_° There is opportunity to speak under this section poor to the end of the agenda Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Plamm~g Commission Secretary for distnbution to the Commissioners All requests for items to be placed on a Plamm~g Commission agenda must be in wrihng The deadline for submitting these dams is 6 00 p m Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting The Planning Commission Secretary receives all such items AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7 00 a m to 6 00 p m ,except for legal City holidays APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's deasion to the City Counal within 10 calendar days Any 5 of 6 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA AUGUST 9, 2006 Ru+~o CUCASfONGA appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and,must be accompanied by a fee of $1,747 for maps and $1,842 for all other deasions of the Commission (Fees are established and governed by the City Council) Please tum off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at httP'//www ci rancho-cucamonga.ca.us r~ u • U 6of6 ~ Vicinity Map' ~ . Planning 'Commission' August 9, 2006 19 TH ~ 1 BASE UN! ~~ B CHURCH / M11 1 FOOTH/LL ARROW ' ' D,E,F 8TH ~Z ~ p ~ ~' ~¢ m ~ ~ . ... 3 W 4TH .LER A/ Q ~ Meeting Location " City Hall • 10500 Civic Center Drive u r1 f..J i ~ THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA , RAxcHo CUCAMONGA AUGUST 9, 2006 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Califbrnia I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call , Chairman Stewart _ Vice Chairman Fletcher Maaas _ McPhail _ Munoz _ II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES April 26, 2006 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendardems are expected to be routine and non-controversial They wdl be acted on by the Commission atone time without discussion If anyone has concern over any item, if should be removed for discussion A HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION DRC2006-00551 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -Consideration of a request to resand Historic Landmark Designation 90-067 and re-designate the Santa Fe Cucamonga Depot site as a Point of Interest, located at 8th Street and Archibald Avenue - APN 0209-062-04 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related protect Please wait to be recogn¢ed by the Chairman and HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION - AGENDA ~,~HO AUGUST 9, 2006 Cvc,+MONCn Page 2 address the Comm~sston by stating yourname and address All such optmons shall be Itmited to 5 mtnutes per tnd~vtdual for each protect Please sign m after speaking VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission Items to tie discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda VII. COMMISSION BUSINESS VIII. ADJOURNMENT 1, Lois J Schrader, Planning Commtss~on Secretary o/the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certdy that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on August 3, 2006, at least 72 hours pnor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is to session. Coples of the Planning Commission agendas and mtnutes can be found at http llwww cl rancho-cucamonaa.ca us If you need special assistance or accommodations to partiapate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ® ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the hearing impaued C~ • r~ L • HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION - AGENDA ~,~NO AUGUST 9, 2006 C`x;"r'o""" Page 3 ' INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view To allow all persons ~to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks beef If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table State your name for the record and speak into the microphone After ' speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podum It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do sounder "Public Comments " There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing The deadline for submitting these items is 6 00 p m Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting The Planning Commission Secretary receives all such items AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7 00 a m to 6 00 p m ,except for legal City holidays APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission deasion may appeal the Commission's decision to the Cary Council within 10 calendar days Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $1,747 for maps and $1,842 for all other decisions of the Commission (Fees are established and governed by the City Council) Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is m session Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at htto //www ci rancho-cucamonga ca.us Vicinity Map Historic Preservation Commissions August 9, 2006 ~~ A ~ Meeting Location N City Hall 10500 Civic Center Dnve ~,h i u i i, ~ • » ~ ' T H E C I T Y O F _ R A N C tl O C U C A M O N G A ' II StaffIZepo1-t ~, ~ , DATE. August 9, 2006 ,~ TO. Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Angela Landaverde, Planning Aide II u ~ SUBJECT HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION DRC 2006-00551 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Cb'nsideraUon of a request to rescind Historic Landmark Designation 90-067 and redesignate as a Point of Interest for the Santa''Fe Cucamonga Depot, located at 8th Street and Archibald Avenue - APN: 0209-062-04 ~~ • BACKGROUND ' A Historical Significance On February 7, 1990, the City Councl designated the Santa Fe Cucamonga depot a historic landmark The origln~l depot was built in 1887 and was a large structure denoted by Victorian era detailing with a steeply pitched roof and generous overhang. In 1945, the depot was rebuilt and the new "Art Moderne" bwlding Incorporated a portion of the original freight room The structure which displayed a significant "Art Moderne" style, a rarity in Rancho Cucamonga, contributed to the architectural diversity of the Clty. Its prominent location along the south side of the Santa Fe Railroad track made it a dominant part of the neighborhood character, while enabling citrus, orchard crops, and grapes to be shipped all over the United States The historic designation review process was triggered when the property owner, the Atchison/Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad sent a letter Informing the City of their Intention to demolish the building because of vandalism and unlawful entry On December 7, 1989, the Historic Preservation Commission designated the Santa Fe Cucamonga Depot a Historic Landmark and on February 7, 1990, the City Council adopted the Resolution of Approval for Historic Designation of the structure Since the City Council designated the structure in 1990, the depot has been demolished for reasons stated below B. Site Characteristics The Cucamonga depot site is located on the south side of the Santa Fe railroad tracks, east of Archibald Avenue on the north side of 8th Street, a few feet from the "T" intersection of Belmont Avenue and 8th Street The parcel on which it stood is a narrow . piece of land running alongside the tracts, extending from Archibald Avenue east to Haven Avenue ITEM A HISTORIC PRESERVATION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00551 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA August 9, 2006 ~ ' Page 2 ANALYS S ~ A General On July 5, 1991, the Cucamonga Santa Fe Depot was set ablgze early in the morning. It was believed by the fire district that a "bottle rocket" type of home-made~f~rework, 'thrown on the eastern portion of the roof of the de~iot, ignited the wood-framed structure Extensive structural damage occurred to the roof and the interior of the bwlding. On August 1, 1991, it was recommended by staff that the Commission approve of efforts to mitigate Santa Fe's demolition request by requiring a HABS/HAER quality documentation of the depot The depot was thereafter demolished. Because the structure has already been demolished, staff recommends re~tesignatmg the site as a Historic Point of Interest, which is merely recogrntion for historical purposes. Staff would also recommend that a commemorative plaque be installed when the property is developed B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT• Redesignation is exempt from the regwrements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Article 19, Section 15308 FACTS FOR FINDING: ~ , A. Historical and Cultural Sionrficance: Finding 1 The proposed Historic Point of Interest is particularly representative of a historic period, type, style, region, or way of life Fmdmo 2 The proposed Historic Point of Irterest is an example of the type of budding which was once common, but is now rare. FacUs: The Depot was originally built in 1887 and was rebuilt m 1945. The new "Art Moderne" depot, an architectural rarity in Rancho Cucamonga, incorporated part of the original 1887 structure The budding was Inked to the railway that was important to hfe in Rancho Cucamonga, The depot was destroyed by a fire` m 1991 and was consequently demolished Findin 3 The proposed Historic Point of Interest is connected with a business or use, which was once common but is now rare. FacUs. It enabled estrus, orchard crops, and grapes to be shipped all over the United States. B. Neighborhood and Geographic Settmp. Findin 1 The proposed Historic Point of Interest benefits the historic character of the neighborhood A-2 ~1 • HISTORIC PRESERVATION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00551 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ August 9, 2006 • Page 3 Finding2 The proposed Point of Historic Interest,•in its location, represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or aty FacUs: Although demolished, the simple building which displayed a significant "Art Moderne" style, a ranfy in Rancho Cucamonga, contributed to the architectural diversity of the City. Its prominent location along the south side of the Santa Fe Railroad track made d a dominant part of the neighborhood character and a familiar sight to indiwduals passing by. CORRESPONDENCE The Historic Point of Interest designation was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Dady Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation ,Commission recommend approval of Historic Point of Interest DRC2006-00551 to be forwarded to the City Counal for final action Respectfully submitted, ~. ~~ • Ja s R Troyer, AICP ~ • Planning Director JRT•AL\ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Rancho Cucamonga City Counctl Staff Report Dated February 7, 1990 Exhibit C - Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report Dated August 1, 1991, for Demolition of Structure Draft Resolution of Approval for DRC2006-00551 ' A-3 i,h ~~ ~~ I , _`. !,f ',;,` ~ MAIN ,' ~.~~ ;ti ~~.~ a W ' ::rr~ 4- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _~ A ~ , - .. ~ ' <. ,,f. ,~, SUBJECT PARCEL 300 0 300 600 Feet ~ Cucamonga depot 300 ft shp ~ Parcels shp • A-4 EXHIBIT A .y,y, CITY OF RANCTiO ~CUCAMONGA. STAFF,REPORT DATE: February 7, 1990 ~ ,~ T0: Mayor dnd Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner , Jeff Gravel,~Assistant Planner BY: SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE CUCAMONGA DEPOT, EIGHTH ~', I. RECOMMENDATION: The HistoriC~Preservation Commission recommends a e , y ouncil approve'the attached resolution designating the Cucamonga Depot as a Historical, Landmark because it meets the criteria for designation in the Historic Preservation Ordinance and because designation may h21p to preserve the building for a useful life in the future. , ~J • II. BACKGROUND: The Cucamonga Depot has come to our attention because e owner, the Atchison/Topeka and Santa Fe Railway, sent a letter informing the City of their intention to demolish the building. The building has been plagued by vandalism and unlawful entry. historicalesignificance oflthe building ing for time to assess the At the Novembgr 2, 1989 Historic Preservation Commission Meeting, Staff asked the Commission members if they wished to set a date for a designation hearing for the depot. The response by the Commission was unanimous to schedule the depot for public hearing in December. On December 7, 1989, the Historical Preservation Commission recommended to the City Council purchasing (when available), for a token amount, the Cucamonga Depot and designating it as a Historical Landmark. III. DESCRIPTION SUMMARY: A. Lo9~t~,~Street, 1 east~oof fArchibaldt Avenue the The hsitee is currently zoned Industrial Park, Subarea 7 in the Industrial Specific Plan. The area surrounding the site is predominantly vacant, zoned Industrial Park and General Industrial. However, there are existing residences to the south. EXHIBIT B A-5 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REr~12T CUCAMONGA DEPOT February 7, 1990 Page 2 ,. ,. B. Significance: According to Neil Leverton, the Santa Fe ai way epresentative that Staff met with,"the Topeka offdce records show 1945 to .be the date' of construction"of the present Depot on the site of the original 1887 Depot. The post World War II years saw huge volumes of produce shipped from this building. Commissioner Cooper indicated, at the November 2, 1989 Historical Preservation Commission meeting, that the Depot is significant in the fact that it was used to ship grapes to the east coast and all over the United States. Furthermore, according to David Cameron, a Santa Monica Preservationist knowledgable of railroads, the more modern style, such as the Cucamonga type are disappearing faster than the older Victorian style. Lynn Merrill, Historical Consultant to the City, believes that this style of railroad station may be one of the last in Southern California. It should also be noted that while the station was in operation it acted as the activity center for the Old Cucamonga Community. C. Issues: Currently, the Atchison/Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad property is for sale. The San Bernardino and Los Angeles Association of Governments are looking into the purchase of the line for a future commuter rail line. Upon wham or whatever organization purchases the railroad line, the opportunity will exist for the structure to be moYed and refurbished to serve as a portion of a new transportation depot or for another purpose. IV. CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the istorica andmark designation for the Cucamonga Depot because of its important role in the life of the community of Rancho Cucamonga and because of its architectural type which was once common but now rare, and thus making it historically significant to the City. l ly ~trty~'tted Bra~.B~gT i er ~~ City Planner BB:JG/jfs Attachments: H~sand~ResolutiontofnDecember~7,~ 19ggf Report, Minutes City Council Resolution of Approval • • L J A-6 r DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: EIGHTH STREET CITY OF ftANCHO'CUCAMONGA ST,~1FF REPORT ~~ December 7, 1989 Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission Larry Henderson, Principal Planner Arlene Banks, Associate Planner~~ A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE CUCAMONGA , AYN: • C I, BACKGROUND: The Cucamong$,, D TopekaaandcSanta FeoRailwayensent ecause a owner, the Atchison, a letter„ informing the City of their~~intention to demolish the building. The building has been plagued by vandalism and unlawful entry. The City responded to the letter by asking for time to assess the historical significance of the building and determine if the City is interested in purchasing or leasing it. At the November 2, 1989 Historic Preservation Commission meeting, staff asked the Commission members i'f they wished to set a date for a designation hearing for the depot. The unanimous response was to schedule a public hearing in December. On Tuesday, November 21, 1989, staff and Commission member Levert n, at themsite and inspectedethetinteriortof the bui dingal II. SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION: A, Location: The Cucamonga Depot is located on the south side of e an a Fe railroad tracks, east of Archibald on the north side of Eighth Street, a few feet from the "T" intersection of Belmont and Eighth Street. The parcel on which it stands is a narrow piece of land running alongside the tracks, extending from Archibald east to Haven. For this report, the "site" is the land on which the depot stands. B. Site Land Use, Zonin and General Plan Desi nation: The site o e epo is a are pa c o an wo or ree eet above street level, with no landscaping. Dirt, asphalt paving, and an old weighing platform characterize the area surrounding the building. A-7 ITEM B '~h~ CUCAMONGA DEPOT December 7, 1989 Page 2 L~ The Development Districts Map shows that th,e Depot is within the Industrial Area Specific Plan, in Subarea 17, "Industr,')al Park", which serves as~a transition zone from more intensive industrial or commercial activities,,to residential areas. New development in this zone is required to be especially sensitive 'to the surrounding's: ' The General Plan shows railroad use for the site. Surrounding Land Use, Zoning, and General Plan Designation: North: -Land Use: Railroad tracks. Zoning: Subarea 17 in the Industrial Specific Plaf~ (Industrial Park). General Plan Map: Railroad. ~ , South: - Land Use: Residential. Zoning: Subarea 4, Industrial Area Specific'~Plan (General Industrial). General Plan, Map: General Industrial East: - Land Use: Railroad use/vacant. Zoning: Subarda 17, Industrial Area Specific Plan. General Plan Map: Railroad West: - Land Use: Railroad use/vacant. Zoning: Subarea 17, • Industrial Area Specific Plan. General Plan Map: Railroad. D. Descri tion: The Cucamonga Depot is a simple, rectangular, ~ one-s ory wilding with smooth 'stucco walls, a flat roof, a horizontal band along the roofline, and a band of horizontal grooves a few feet beneath the roofline. These features, as well as the rounded overhang above the assymetical north entrance, classify the style as "Art Moderne". The depot has ~ entrances~on both the street and track sides, and several boarded up windows and freight doors. "Cucamonga" is painted on the upper portion of the east, north, and west walls, a'nd "Santa Fe" on the south wall. Four pilasters, the outer two wide, the inner two narrow, enliven and add a sense of strength to the highly visible west side. Graffiti is sprayed all over the building, and fire has damaged the northeast portion. The inside of the depot has been vandalized; graffiti covers every surface and broken glass, trash, and smashed splinters of wood litter the floor. The interior design is plain and simple, divided into three parts: a small public waiting room with bathrooms, an office section with numerous built-in cabinets, and a lower and upper freight area. The construction materials and design of the freight section lead staff to believe that it was part of the • original 1887 depot, with the envelope of the new building constructed around it. A-8 ~u~w~unuM ucrvi December 7, 1989 Page 3 • ' ~B. Significance• ~ , 1. Historical: The railroad came through the town in , i contributed to the Cucamonga boom years. The ,~ train depot built at that time was a typical ,Yictorian structure of wood with a steeply pitched roof and ' generous overhang. According to information given to Melicent Arner by Lynn Merrill, historical consultapt, , the Santa Fe rail line wAs constructed through North ' Cucamonga about the first of March, 1887, and the depot completed by the end of the following October. The , station served as a telegraph office as well as a passenger and freight~~station. According_to Light Over the Mountain by Donald Clucas, the bu ng was sever y amage in the "'big wind" of December 13, 1887, which also destroyed the nearby newly constructed North Cucamonga Hotel. ~' The energetic townspeople soon rebuilt both buildings, howgver, and the train station ' ~ ~ was back in business. ~t proved vital to the growing community, enabling,,orchard crops, citrus, and grapes to be shipped to the world, and people to travel from place to place more easily. According to Neal Leverton, the Santa Fe Railway representative that staff ,mein with, the Topeka 'office , records show 1945 to be the date of construction of the r present depot. The postwar years saw huge volumes of produce shipped from this building. Furthermore. according to Santa Monica preservationist David' Cameron who is especially knowledgeable about railroads, the more modern depots are disappearing faster than the older ones. Lynn Merrill believes that this style station nay be the last of its kind in Southern California. Staff thinks that this semi-public building played an important role in the life of the community and is a type of building that was once common but is now rare and thus has historical significance. Commission member Melicent Arner will be researching newspapers for articles about the depot once the month of its opening is known; and member Ada Cooper will be looking for information in her files. This research will document the history of the building and help further establish its significance. 2. Architectural: The Art Moderne style, according to A ie ui e o American Houses by Virginia and Lee c es er, was ui t main y rom about 1920 to 1940. A-9 l,UI.AMUN6A utru i December 7, 1989 Page 4 "I~ ~ i C~ It was influenced by t for ships, airplanes surfaces, curved corn the Art Moderne sty airstreams could move I he "streamlined industrial design and automobiles. The smooth ers, and horizontal emphasis of 1e all' give the feeling that smoothly over them;.." (p.465) Although the depot is a simple building, it's Art Moderne style, a rarity in Rancho Cucamonga, gives the building more architectural significance than it might have if this style were common. Staff concludes that the building's distinctive architectural style, simple though it may be, is significant. Properly maintained end landscaped, staff can imagine this building looking far more attractive and making an important contribution to the architectural diversity of the City. ~~„ 3. Issues: The Railway cgmpany wishes to have the depot ' a en off their hands because it has served its purpose and now is only a.. maintenance problem. An issue of importance is whether the City would want to purchase or lease this building and possibly eventually move it to serve as a new transportation depot or for some other use. (A major portion of the building is on a poured concrete foundatiorv; moving it may be difficult, but by no means impossible). The Commission needs to consider whether the building is of sufficient interest to warrant recommending not only the designation of the building, but also to recommend that the City Council negotiate with the railway company to purchase it for future City use. It should be noted that the depot is located within the City's Redevelopment Project Area, and a future transportation center will likely be located within the Redevelopment Project Area. C. Environmental Assessment: Designations are exempt from r c e c on 15308). IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Staff finds that the Cucamonga Depot meets severs cri eria or designation found in Section 2.24.090 of the Historic Preservation Ordinance. A. Historical and Cultural Significance: 1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical style. C~ A-10 I • •' ` ' I 4 YI ' , CUCAMONGA DEPUT ~~ ~ , December 7, 1989 a Page 5 '~ , I~ F , N ' 2. The proposed landmark is aq example of a Type of '~ building which was once commop but is now rare. ~• 3. The 'proposed landmark'is connected with a business and ~• use which was once common but is now rare. ~, 4. The site is the location of an important historic ~~ building. ,, •• , g. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting. , 1,. The propose landmark ~~n its location represents an established and familiar vis'ua1 feature of the neighborhood, community and city. (Ord. 70 S9,1979). V, CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been' advertised in The Daily epor owners within 300 feet have been notified, and staff hds met with and corresponded wf.th representatives of the railway company. VI. RECOHQ+IENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation mm ss~on recommend to the City Council the designation of the Cucamonga Depot as a landmark because it meets the criteria for designation in the Historic Preservation Ordinance, and because designation may help to preserve the building fora useful life in the future. Respectfully submitted, Larr H fiderson, Principal Planner LH:AB:js Attachments: Exhibit "B" - Photographson Map Exhibit "C" - Resolutions A-11 W ~~ ,jl~~ Cucamonga Depot N A-12 ~ Est: "A" 1 ~ 1 _ ,, HISTORIC PRhSERVA'r~nN COMMISSION_LANDMARK SURVEY ~' Address • ~n« a+.. . • 71,,,f _~~ AP/: ~ ,~ ,~ , i M1 .5 ~~de n Date of Photo_-T ___-- _ _ _ ~ __ _ __-_ _... _I view Looking ~tsP Date of Photo /f-99 Page of _ Pages. A-13 w~srd~ LJH2 ~-7-90 H ~, ,' y , SOct~SfG~~ ~~ ,~ ,~~ "' "-Vie~+ Looking 'NOrth -_~- ~~~ _, Date of Photo.,_~-Q~ nom si~~e. I 't11 'I ERV~TX9N COMMI$SION_.LANdMARK`SURVEY~ P '~~ Address ~'.tt4m- = p~ off' ~~ AP#: '~ View Looking Gt.hs"I- Date of Photo ~~-_~ Page _ of _ Pages. ®- A-14 ®~ LJH2 i' V i, ~, ~-7- 90 • COMMISSIONERS ~i~~i BILLINGS, BANKS, HASKVITZ, SCHMIDT, COOPER,,PRESTON ~, , NONE NONE ~~ NOES: '`~_ Or44ISSI0NERS:, 'ABSENT: CO ~ SSIONER: MOTION: Moved bye reston, sec Condition No. 1 to s that in satisfactory financing, e s shown on Sheet 3 of the p ati the following vote: , AYES: CONMISSI PRE BILLI NOES: ISSIONERS: ~ NONE A : COMMISSIONERS: NONE --carried ***** ~, • B. A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE CUCAMONGA DEPOT, EIGHTH STREET, EAST OF Arlene Banks,,Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Schmidt asked if the Railroad has stated that they would be willing to sell it for almost nothing. , Mrs. Banks responded that the term "token amount" has been used and that the Railroad has not officially responded. Chairman Schmidt asked if the City bought the depot, would there be a deadline to move it. ' Mrs. Banks responded that it would be negotiated. Commissioner Banks asked if a condition of purchase would be move it. Mrs. Banks responded that it would be up to the City Council and the Railroad. HPC MINUTES • -3- I ;NER, ' ~~ P --carried i y Banks to amend the Resolution, . event the applicant is unable to attain re shall be returned to the appearance November,l7, 1989. The motion carried by BANKS, HASKVITZ, COOPER, ARNER, SCHMIDT,~, DECEMBER 7, 1989 A-15 ~'~ Commissioner Banks stated there was' talk of using the depot for'the prgpased railroad being reactivated. She felt this could be focal point Instead of Haven Avenue. ' Mr. Henderson stated the site is too narrow to accommodate the 320 parking spaces needed. There is some incompatibility in 'terms of existing land uses. Archibald Avenue is not designed to carry the maximum traffic load in the City, Haven Avenue is. Haven Avenue is designed as the City's mayor access as far employment goes. , Commissioner Preston asked if this is an Amtrak passenger line now or is the southerly line the passenger line. Commissioner Billings responded they both are. , Commissioner Preston stated he had some concerns with this building and that it was not significant, but the report his changed that. He commented that he f~ndingskandtwh,atefactsiareatonsupport them ibHe~statedlthat frsomeo en goes to the City Clerk or Department Secretary and wants to see on what basis the Commission made its decision, it i,s always easier to have those in the Resolution. , Commissioner Banks questioned if the Commission has owner consent. Mrs. Banks responded the City has owner knowledge of what is happening and have not had an owner objection. Comnissiorter Haskvitz questioned what the estimated cost would be 7ro move the structure. Mr. Henderson responded that staff has not looked into any of that information. Chairman Schmidt opened the public hearing. Hearing no response, Chairman Schmidt closed the public hearing. MOTION: Moved by Preston, seconded by Arner to recommend to the City Council the purchase, for a token amount, and Landmark designation of the Cucamonga Depot located on Eighth Street, east of Archibald, and direct staff to further define the findings in the final Resolution to reflect the staff report. The motion carried by the following vote: HPC MINUTES -4- DECEMBER 7. 1989 • ~J • A-16 ~' i ' , , •~ ~ 1 ' ' RESOLUTION N0. '89-03 ~ • ~, , A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERYATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ,, RECOMMENDING ' APPROVAL OF THE CUCAMONGA,DEPOT LOCATED AT' ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND EIGHTH STREET AS A LANDMARK' a WHEREAS, the Historic Preservbtiori Commission has held a duly • advertised public hearing to consider all comments, on the proposed Landmark Designation. ~° ~ ,. WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received, and reviewed all input regarding said Landmark Designation. , WHEREAS, all legal prerequisil:es to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. ~ ~, ,. NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows: SECTION I: The application applies to property located at A;sessor Parcel Numm e~~62-04. ~~ • SECTION II: The proposed landmark is significant historically and architectural-Constructed on the site of the original 1887 depot and incorporating a portion of the orginal freight room, the building was constructed in 1945. It is now one of th'e last of this style depot in Southern California. Furthermore, the depot played an important role in the" life of the community. Although a simple building, it is also important architecturally because it is in the Art Moderne style, a rarity in Rancho Cucamonga. It thus contributes to the architecural diversity of the City. The proposed landmark meets the following criteria established ih , Chapter 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code: ' A. Historical and Cultural Significance • 1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical style, the Art Moderne style. 2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which was once common but is now rare, namely, a World War II-era depot. 3. The proposed landmark is connected with a business and use which was once common but is now rare; it enabled citrus, orchard crops, and grapes to be shipped all over the world. A-17 VCL CIIIVGI / , 1JUJ ' Page 2 ~ ' i ,. 4, The site is the location ~of ~n important historic building, the original 1887 depot. B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting. 1. The proposed landmark in its location represents an estAblished and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community and city. ' (Ord. 70 S9,1979). SECTION III: Designation of a landmark is exempt from CEQA (Article 19, Section I~5~(f8T ~ '~ ' SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence received and reviewed by this ommission and based on the findings set forth above, , NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission does hereby recommend approval of designation of the Cucamonga Depot~as a landmark. ~ , APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 7TH DAY'OF DECEMBER, 1989. HISTOR ERVATION C ISS N OF~THE~ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA , o mi airman AYES: COMMISSIONERS: PRESTON, ARNER, BANKS, COOPER, HASKVITZ, SCHMIDT, BILLINGS ' NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE • ~'I • • A-18 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 1, 1991 Tp; Chairman and Members of the_Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Larry J. Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner By; Anthea M. Hartig, Associate Planner S~~J~T; UPDATE ON THE SANTA FE DEPOT FIRE BACKGROUND: As some of you may be aware, the Cpcamonga Santa Fe depot was are early in the morning of fu home!madel firework r thrown ion believes that a "bottle rocket" typ ited' the wood-framed the eastern portion of the depots roof, ign structure. While the walls are standing, extensive structural damage to the roof and interior occurred. The exterior walls are buckling and the structure as a whole is in a very weakened states the portions of the structure wdestro ed datPhotographst of the ldepot•are Bin luded hfor your completely Y review (See Exhibit "HPC-1")• ~ Santa Fe Railroad has already expressed an interest in demolishing the gonecoutefortbids on the demolition of he structuret.howeverailroad has r~ ANALYSIS: When a designated local landmark suffers unforeseen damages such as these, the City has a number of regulations to follow and options upon which to decide. The Building Official has deemed the depot to be >_n an "unsafe and dangerous condition," and thus per our Ordinance, the Commission only needs to be aware of measures taken;to correct such a condition (2.24.150). The Ordina~ceh sofficial Building actions that "have been declared necessary by Official) to correct the unsafe or dangerous conditions, may be performed pursuant to this section." Jerry Grant, the City's Official, has already determined that demolition is the most viable option. is~ sure stolrequesthe pAppropri telmit>.gationsmwouldo includestrequiring Santa Fe to have a completed HAGS/HAER quality documentation of the depot prior to demolition. Upon site inspections and discussioro osed the City's Building and Safety staff, we feel any p P rehabilitation of the depot would be both c~tla hazardoous nstatey dangerous in that the structure is currently plans ofstherdepot'segremodeling intther1940sa andohaserecei ed an offer from a graduate student in Cal Poly's architecture program to volunteer drafting services. ~' ~v~l~~~ i \y A-19 ,y, ' I, HPC STAFF REPORT ~ ` SANTA FE DEPOT UPDATE I August 1, 1991 it I Page 2 ~ • II ~ 1 I RECOMMENDATION: Staff) recommends that the Commission approve of effortsil to mitigate Santa Fe's demolition request by requiring a NABS/HAER quality documentation of the depot. ,~ I Respectfully submitted, d~-r` ~ ~~• ~k` ' Larry J. Hendezaon Principal Planner ii ~I LJH:AH:sp I~ , , Attachments: Exhibit "HPC-1" - Photographs of the Cucamonga , Salta Fe Depot's Fire Damage II f 11 /, u A-20 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LANDMARK,SURVEY Address: 8~' ~T' l ~C.FN?~-+'D tylE. AP# Zp•~ - p~ 2r0¢ . 1 ~ , '` -' ,~ nta ~e _ ~ _ ~ _- _, . , ti, ~~5 i _~ _ - _-__ ~ _~ ' ' ` ` ~ L `3'j W ' - ~~ I ~~' ~ t I+i. _ ~ ~ ' ,g Jiew Looking ~~~ .Date of Photo n ~y'-'t ' ~> i 'EXf-N g~T' ~G --1 1 1 ^ A-21 ffiSTORIC PRESERVP.TION COMMISSION I:ANDMARK SURVEY Address: , •~ View Looking ~ Date of Photo `~' SUIr`( t99 ~ . A-22 ~X1-Y1P~fT' H'PG-I A. ~'~ HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY 207 - O(o Z - 04 ~~ M ' Address: ~~~'~ ST' ; ~c~asw ~E AP# .. ~ ^„ . Date of Photo 5 ~ LY 199 I, View Looking w~- P23 EXNI~IT ~-1S ,, , 's ~~ i .~ ~* II ~+ ='~, l ~ zlGi . _ - _ .ira,~,~ ' ~• ~,, ,, to .n ~ '~ ,` ,, - - ;u -,~_ . ~y i~ '1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSTON LANDMARK SURVEY Address: „ ~ ~ , A-24 ~ ~, ii -~G ar__..i....lrina N.W G~1 _. Law va a._ HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY ~j'k`S"r -- -Ai~l.E~i~-1'~ ~E AP# 20~ -OfoZ - C~, .. , Address• ., ,'~ ii V1eW Loolang ~~~ ~ Ua[e OI rnuw '~ A-25 ~xI-N arr -~ fC- ' I~ ~~, ~ ,, • RESOLUTION NO., 06-02 ~ ~, A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF CHANGING THE HISTORIC DESIGNATION FROM A LOCAL HISTORIC LANDMARK (90-067) TO HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DRC2006-00551 FOR THE SANTA FE CUCAMONGA DEPOT, LOCATED AT 8TH SKEET AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDING6 IN SUPPORT THEREQF - APN 0209-062-04. A. Rentals. ' 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has requested a Historic Point of Interest designation as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subject Point of Historic Interest ' referred to as "the application,;' 2. On August 9, 2006, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3. All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. M B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows , • 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A" of this Resolution are true and correct. 2 The application applies to approximately 1.22-acre of land, basically a narrow rectangular configuration, located on 8th street and Archibald Avenue. • , 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 9, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2 24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Muniapal Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts a. Historical and Cultural Siomficance: Finding 1 The proposed Historic Point of Interest is particularly representative of a historic period, type, style, region, or way of life. FacUs The Depot was originally bwlt in 1887 and was rebwlt in 1945 The new "Art Moderne" depot, an architectural rarity in Rancho Cucamonga, incorporated part of the original 1887 structure. The building was linked to the railway that was important to life in Rancho Cucamonga. The depot was destroyed by a fire in 1991 and was consequently demolished Finding 3 The proposed Historic Point of Interest is connected with a business or use, which was once common, but is now rare FacUs It enabled citrus, orchard crops, and grapes to be shipped all over the United States Finding 4 The site is the location of an important or historic bwlding A-26 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.06-02 DRC2006-00551 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA August 9, 2006 ~ Page 2 ' b Neiohborhood and Geooraohic Settino' , ' Findm 1. The proposed Historic Point of Interest materially benefits rthe historic character of the neighborhood. Findin 2: The proposed Historic Point of Interest in its location represents an established and familiarvisual feature of the neighborhood, community, or aty. FacUs Although demolished, the simple bwlding which displayed a significant "Art Moderne" style, a rarity in Rancho Cucamonga, contributed to the architectural diversity of the City Its prominent location along the south side of the Santa Fe Railroad track made it a dominant part of the neighborhood character 4 This Commission hereby finds that the•pro~ect has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Gwdelines promulgated thereunder The Council finds that this Historic Point of Interest is exempt under CEQA, pursuant to State CEQA Gwdelines Section 15308, as a Class 8 exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the H~stonc Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 9th day of August, 2006, of Historic Point of Interest Designation DRC2006-00551. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolutign. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF AUGUST 2006 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Pam Stewart, Chavman ATTEST• James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary Planning Director of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certifythatthe foregoing Resolution was dulyand regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the Cdyof Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 9th day of August 2006, by the following vote-to-wit• AYES. COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS • • A-27 Mr Buller explained that project woull require a General Plan Amendment, a zone change, and a Development Agreement to reduge parking ratio standards He indcated that the purpose of this meeting was to get a concurrence of the Task Force to determine Whether the concept is acceptable , Mayor Alexander reilerateii his obtecUons to the proposed density He expressed his desire for garden cottages of 800 to 1,100 square feet in 1-and 2-storq plans , Planning Commissioner Pam Stewart agreed that fhe project concept was too dense She supported the idea of garden cottages as a buffer to the'existing neighborhood. She felt the protect would bring needed pedestnan traffic to the neighborhood ~ She indicated that she would not support any reduction in parking Mayor Pro Tem Williams said that there are 30 and 40 year olds liwng with senior parents at Villa Pacific, another "senwrs only" protect She felt that parking must be adequate Commissioner Stewart indicated that this is a different area, with a lot of new expensive housing ~ ' Planning Commissioner Cnstine McPhail said that project must provide lifts and, elevators Mayor Pro Tem Williams agreed that even ~-story buildings would need lifts and elevators Commissioner McPhail stated that a safe pedestnan crossing must be provided at'Base Line Road '' • Pnnapal Planner Dan Coleman indicated that a traffic signal is planned at intersection Peter Pitassi, architect representing Joseph Filippi Winery, commented that they were not opposed to residential land use Pedestrian movement in this area is a mator design consideration He said that it would be inappropriate for the City to give incentives for market rate housing He stated that the project should meet all City parking standards He indicated that some developers, such as Lewis Homes, are now planning 2 or 3 times as much visitor parking as the Development Code would require He felt that archftecture is very important in how it ties into the heavy winery theme of the area and the Henry's Market shopping center He stated that it is tough to do a 3-story product with a winery theme He commented that two full ingress/egress access points needed for residents , Gino Filippi, Joseph Filippi Winery, agreed that residential land use is acceptable He requested that the project incorporate vineyard planting into the landscape design D. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING None E. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 4 45 p m i A-28 Maroh 30, 2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ETIWANDA/BASE LINE HISTORIC STUDY TASK FORCE MINUTES Saecial Meetinst ~ , i ~ I ~ , A. CALL TO ORDER ' A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force was held on Wednesday, March 30, 2005, iri the Rains Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Croic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California The meeting was cdlled to order at 4 00 p m , Task Force Members Present Mayor William Alexander, Mayor Pro Tem Diane Williams, and Planning Commissioners Pam Stewart and C,ristine McPhail Staff Present Brad Buller, City Planner anc~ pan Coleman, Principal Planner f 1e # fr M B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS • ..... C. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION 1 Discussion Of Planning Area 3 Brad Buller, City Planner, explained that the purpose of the Task Force meeting was to obtain input regarding proposed development of Planning Area 3 Bob Grigsby, the applicant, presented their concept of seniors only "for-sale" condominiums at northeast corner of Base Line Road and San Carmela Court He apologized that his partner, who had the project renderings, was delayed Mayor William Alexander asked Mr Grigsby if their protect had to be this dense to pencil outs Mr Grigsby replied that it did not Mayor Alexander indicated that he did not like 3-story buildings and felt the protect was too dense • Mayor Pro Tem Diane Williams said she thought the concept of seniors only condominiums was a great idea In particular, she liked the range of unit sizes A-29 staff Report DATE August 9, 2006 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Mike Smdh, Assistant Planner SUBJECT• EODREIPRENOEURAOL R SOTAURANTS CORPORATIONITA equesOtOto mods the operating hours of a previously approved Las Campanas restaurant and bar, located within the Industrial Park (IP) District, Subarea 7 at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Mdlik~n Avenue Currently, the approved hours of operation are 11 00 a m to 10 00 p m (Sunday through Thursday) and 11 00 a m to 11 00 p m (Friday and Saturday) The proposed hours of operation are 11.00 a m to 12 00 midnight (Sunday APN g0229U01aa69 andR Iat0eda hleso 1 00 a.m (Friday and Saturday) Development Review DRC2004-01125 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17426. On August 25, 2005, a Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Development Review DRC2004-01125 The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is regwred for subsequent projects or minor revisions to protects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning• North - Vacant -Community Commercial (CC) District, Terra Vista Community Plan South - Office/commercial protect under construction -Industrial Park (IP) District, Subarea 7 East - Commercal Center -Industrial Park (IP) District, Subarea 7 West - Office/commercial protect under construction -Industrial Park (IP) District, Subarea 7 B General Plan Designations Protect Site - Industrial Park North - Community Commercal South - Industrial Park East - Industrial Park • West - Industrial Park ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00764 -ENTREPRENEURIAL RESTAURANTS CORPORATION August 9, 2006 • Page 2 BACKGROUND The proposed restaurant was previously reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on January 11, 2006 The restaurant is part of afour-building commercial/office complex currently under construction (Related file DRC2004-01125) A condition of approval for the restaurant specifies that "any modification of the operating hours or days shall require revew and approval by the Planning Commission " ANALYSIS A General The building pad area is located immediately adjacent to the southwest corner of 'the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue Construction is underway of the buildings within the surrounding commercial/office center The property across Foothill Boulevard to the north is vacant To the east, is a commercial center that includes, among other uses, Love's Home Improvement and Islands Restaurant The properties to the south, east, and west are zoned Industrial Park (IP) District, Subarea 7, the properties to the north are zoned Commurnty Commercial District, Terra Vista Community Plan Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue are both classified as Mayor Divided Arterials. The nearest residential development is a multi-family apartment complex about 1,000 feet to the north B. Use Description and Hours of Operation The applicant proposes to revise their operating hours of their full-service 'Las Campanas' Mexican restaurant and bar as shown m table below The applicant does not propose to reuse any other aspect of their restaurant - architecture, floor area, and parking demand, for example, will remain unchanged. The restaurant is not approved for entertainment at this time Approved Hours Proposed Hours Sunday thru Thursday 11 00 a m. to 10.00 p m 11.00 a.m to 12:00 Midnight Friday and Saturday 11.00 a.m to 11 00 p m 11.00 a m to 1.00 a.m. C Compatibility with Surroundings. Staff anticipates that the modification to the proposed use will fully comply with the performance standards of this development district and will be compatible with existing or proposed commercal development There is no residential development in the immediate vanity that could be impacted by this modification. D. Environmental Assessment Staff is of the opirnon that no further envvonmental review is necessary because the modification of the project is (1) consistent with the approved master plan, (2) does not physia~lly alter the project, and (3) is within the project scope of the above-sled, prior envvonmental assessments. A-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00764 -ENTREPRENEURIAL RESTAURANTS CORPORATION • August 9, 2006 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Modification of Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00764 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions ' Res~ctfully submitted, ~• ~-~ Jam R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:MS/ge Attachments Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Site Plan Exhibit C - Correspondence from the Applicant Draft Resolution of Approval fot Modification of Conditional Use Permit DRC2005- 00764 ~J A-3 s- ~nArrcr - COLLEGE i .s_- ~^ ~~ IM r 1 1 ~F ^~0 ~~ PROJECT SITE .~ /~ TEI ° TON count EXHIBIT A s ''a`~y< ~L ~- ,~ ~-- j - ~~~ -- ---- ~~-=~rf"'P A-4 UXE GO(F COU~ -~ ---- i -- --------- ~ Ilyap~R QQ ~ ~ O mLL ~M ~ : 1OB0505 ~ ~ u In. ao 101®wIQ 1 ~ __ _ 6 ~ 110 / • Sbtl011 ItlfO 3 Y 0 r ~° t e ' .,~ l~ ~ e M ~ 1.. rMG, I16nMDlYF ' t I ~_ --- i m i~'~ R~I ~ a~ !~, ,~1~ Q~ ,~f. ;~! ~ l,~a 11! l Rdli r N 1- tt ;; ~: ~~ c=;, }6tFffiY -- !~~ ~~,~ y 1!3?Il~l A-5 EXHIBIT 6 _ . ~ !9a ~ l ~ ~ ~y ii i ~ ffR l ~i ~ " ~$ ~I~° i ~ ~ a 1 ~~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ < ~ =~ ~ a~ y V ~~ ~ s ., ~ ys ~C 0 a a m N6 mR vA' OS City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department 10500 Civic Center Dnve ' Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Uniform Application. Supplemental Sheet for Protect Descnption /Request for Modification of Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00764 Entrepreneunal Restaurants Corporation (ERC) received approval from the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission for Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00764 at its meeting of January 11, 2006. In section B - 2(e) of Planning Commission Resolution No.06-O1 it was detennined and resolved "The hours of operation will be Sunday through Thursday from 11.00 a.m. to 10 00 p.m., and Friday and Saturday from 11:00 a.m. to 1 I :00 p.m After further analysis of our planned operation of the Las Campanas restaurant in Rancho Cucamonga, and reviewing the impact on our pending ABC application for our type 471iquor license, ERC is requesting a modification to Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00764 ERC is requesting that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission modify the Conditional Use Perrnit by changing the hours of operation from Sunday through Thursday from 11 00 a.m to 10 00 p.m., and Fnday and Saturday from 11:00 a.m to 11 00 p m to Sunday through Thursday from 11:00 a.m to 12 00 midnight, and Fnday and Saturday from 11:00 a.m to 1:00 a.m. CI1Y Of RANCHO CUCAIAONaA JUL 0 3 ~ RECENED -PLANNING EXHIBIT C .A-6 RESOLUTION NO 06-73 , . A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-00764 TO CHANGE THE OPERATING HOURS REFLECTED IN RESOLUTION NO 06-01 FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED LAS CAMPANAS RESTAURANT AND BAR, LOCATED W (THIN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) DISTRICT (SUBAREA 7), AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND MILLIKEN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN 0229-011.69 ' A Recitals 1 On January 11, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng Following conclusion of the public heanng the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00764 through adoption of their Resolution No 06-01 , 2 Entrepreneurial Restaurants Corporation (Las Campanas Restaurant) filed an application for the Modification of Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00764, as described m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject request is referred to as "the application " 3 On the 9th day of August 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on said application and concluded said meeting on that date . 4 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced duly noticed public heanng on August 9, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows. a The application applies to a restaurant and bar that was previously reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on January 11, 2006, and b The approved hours of operation are Sunday through Thursdayfrom 11 00 a m. to 10 00 p m ,and Friday and Saturday from 11.00 a m to 11.00 p m The applicant requests a change m the hours of operation to Sunday through Thursday from 11 00 a.m to 12 00 midnight, and Fnday and Saturday from 11 00 a m. to 1 00 a m, and c. The applicant does not propose any physical changes to the project including architecture, floor area, or parking requirements; and A-7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-73 DRC2005-00764 -ENTREPRENEURIAL RESTAURANTS CORPORATION August 9, 2006 , Page 2 d The restauranUbar is part of a previously approved protect, Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-01125, that was reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on August 24, 2005, which in turn is part of a master planned commercial and office complex, and e Construction is currently underway of the buildings within the surrounding protect area. The property across Foothill Boulevard to the north is also vacant To the east, is a commercial center that includes, among other uses, Love's Home Improvement and Islands Restaurant The nearest residential development is 1,000 feet to the north, and f The Planning Commission previously approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration on April 28, 1999, for the 140-acre Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan, of which this site is a part Furthermore, the Planning Commission previously issued a Negative Declaration for the Update of the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15630 on February 13, 2005, of which this site is a part There have been no substantial changes m the area to warrant further environmental review 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth m Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed uses are in accord with the General Plan, the obtectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located b The proposed uses, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially mturious to properties or . improvements m the vanity c The proposed uses comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 4 Based upon the facts and information contained m the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is regwred pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) m connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations. a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Gwdelmes, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration m Apn128,1999 m connection with the City's approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17630 Furthermore, the Planning Commission previously issued a Negative Declaration for the update of the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15630 on February 13, 2005. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is regwred in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same protect unless (Q substantial changes are proposed to the protectthat indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment, (n) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the protect was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts, or (ui) new important information shows the protect will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (ro) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the Modification of Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00764, that substantial changes to the protect or the circumstances A-8 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-73 DRC2005-00764 -ENTREPRENEURIAL RESTAURANTS CORPORATION August 9, 2006 ' Page 3 surrounding the protect have not occurred'that would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated m the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration The application proposes only to revise the operating hours of the restaurant and bar, there are no physical changes to the protect Staff further finds that the protect wtll not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not'regwred to reduce the impacts of the protect to a level of less-than-significant The application proposes only to revise the operating hours of the restaurant and bar, there are no physical changes to the protect c Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is regwred pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the Modification of Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00764 d Pursuant to the requirements of California Fish and Game Code Section 711 4 and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 753 5, the Planning Commission finds, based on the Initial Study, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and considering the record as a whole, that there is no evidence before the City that the proposed protect will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends The application proposes only to revise the operating hours of the restaurant arld bar; there are no physical changes to the protect Based on substantial evidence, the Planning Commission hereby makes a declaration rebutting the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in California Department of Fish and Game Regulation 753 5 (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Code, Section 753 5 ) • 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby amends their Resolution No 06-01 by adding the following new Planning Department conddion. ' 15) The operating hours shall be Sunday through Thursday from 11 00 a m to 12.00 midnight and Fnday and Saturday from 11.00 a m. to100am 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF AUGUST 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY• Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST: James R Troyer, Secretary I, James R Troyer, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certifythat the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plamm~g • Commission held on the 9th day of August 2006, by the following vote-to-wit A-9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-73 DRC2005-00764 -ENTREPRENEURIAL RESTAURANTS CORPORATION August 9, 2006 Page 4 AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • • A-10 ar .`-~i-'.. .i b ,t 4 T H E C I T Y O F ' RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report ' DATE August 9, 2006 TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Diregtor BY: Emtly Cameron, Associate Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17919 ' -ELBA INC - A request to subdivide 9 85 acres of land into 50 lots in the Low-Medium Residential Distract' (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located at the northwest corner of Miller and East Avenues - APN 1100-081-03, 04, and 06. . Related ftles Minor Exception DRC2006-00248 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00642. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION• A Project Density 5 dwelling units per acre B Surrounding Land Use and Zonmg. North - Single-Family Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Single-Family Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East - Water of Life Church, City of Fontana West - Single-Family Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) C General Plan Designations Protect Site - Single-Family Residential North - Single-Family Residential South - Single-Family Residential East - Water of Life Church, City of Fontana West - Single-Family Residential D Site Characteristics The protect is situated on the northwest corner of Miller and East Avenues A total of 97 trees are on-site One Mexican Fan Palm will be relocated on-site An abandoned single-family home exists on-site No historical significance was found, therefore, the home will be demolished pnor to construction of the protect ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT17919 -ELBA INC August 9, 2006 . Page 2 ANALYSIS A General The applicant is proposing 50 single-family lots with no housing product at this time The site will be developed under the Low•Medium Residential Development Standards The proposed lots meet all the requirements of the,Etiwanda Specrfic Plan The applicant is proposing to sell the lots to a developer who will then develop the 50 lots with single-family homes at a later date The 50 lots are similar in size to the developed properties surrounding the site, averaging 6,176 square feet per lot The site lies within the Etiwanda South Overlay DistricULow-Medium Residential Distract that requires a 6,000 square foot minimum average lot size and 5,000 square foot minimum lot size `fhe layout provided is similar to the master planned layout which was presented when the , surrounding Tract 15711 was approved The applicant is proposing Firestone Dnve and Morning Crest Place to continue through the protect creating a connecting "loop" with Streets A and B Existing on-site is a vacant home that will be demolished The applicant submitted a histoncal resource assessment for the home (51 years old), and, the property is insignificant for histonc use , B Design Review, Committee The project was • reviewed by the Committee (Fletcher, Stewart, Coleman) on June 20, 2006 The Committee recommended approval with no further revisions ' C Neighborhood Meeting A neighborhood meeting was held on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 A . total of seven neighbors attended Questions pertained to the fencing, property Imes, and public improvements The neighbors were generally accepting of the project • D Minor Exception The applicant is proposing a wall on the east property line and surrounding the not-a-part parcel with wall heights that range from 6 feet 9 inches to 8 feet The wall will be constructed with the development of the homes at a later date and will coordinate with the design of the East Avenue theme wall E Tree Removal Permit A total of 97 trees are proposed to be removed per the Arbonst Report (Jim Borer, November 4, 2005) According to the Arbonst, only one tree is recommended to be preserved and relocated on-site, a Mexican Fan Palm The matonty of the trees surveyed are in an advanced state of decay and have not been maintained F Environmental Assessment Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to dust mitigations and water quality, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration A Mitigation Morntoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the protect • B-2 IL I ' nl II ~, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT17919 -ELBA INC a h • August 9, 2006 , Page 3 ~, CORRESPONDENCE• This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Valley Dady Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property Qwners vinthm a 300-foot radws of the protect sde ~, ~" , RECOMMENDATION Staff, recommends approval of ,Tentative Tract Map ' SUBTT17919 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions and issuance of a , Mitigated Negative DeGaration ' , Respectfully submitt , „ Ja es R Troyer, AICP Ptamm~g Director , DC.EW/ge ~~ Attachments Exhibit A -Site Plan/ Location Map Exhibit B -Grading Plan '~ Exhibd C -Tentative Tract Map Exhibit D - Mmor Exception Exhibit E -Design Review Comments dated June 20, 2006 Exhibd F - Irntial Study I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative ~Tr9ct Map SUBTT17919 , Ir 1 LJ B-3 ~i ~~~ Y, 6w•~ ~i ~ ~l~a • m ~ ~~~~~ ~ U o~$~ ~ ~~ ~~~ a~ tz ~~~ ~ a ~ ~ EXHIBITA ISI 1 ' I ~~ _ I ~ I1¢ a i I. I J~ _`is a __~#B ~ 4 ~ - -- - Z'' ~ ~ d ~ ~ i < <_: j ~ `~ r I ~i rti `~ --- - ~~ - - ~J y I ~ 1 ~6® Y C~ hl~ ~~ Y ~'~ ~- Y ~ r = Y _ _~ ~~ ~ 8 I ,~~ ~g ~sl, Iri -, ~; •I; ,i ~ ~I i ~ ;I~ ~ , '' } ;1 ~ ~-~ -~ I °~ I'I. .s~~ , I:i ~~ • ~~ ~ v _- M~~ ~~~ ~ ~~•~ ~ ~;o ~'; _ ~f ~,~ ~•E I fit ~ ~~~ Y ~, w YF Y'.b ~~ x!~ I% 1 ~ ~® ~-;~ 'I 1 ___~~ I -~~ ~., "s~ Y . ,~~ ~s~E ~s(~has6!~s~~,~p ~s6 ~s0 • °y Ir -~~ ~ I 10 I ~_ ~~ '• ~ ~. Mti i • I, / 1 I ' ) 'i 3 - _ _. -______r__ ~_________________• _ F_____ i _ ___ _ __ ____*. ~/~ i _ ______ i ~' ~T_1 I I ~ffl ~~ ' I~ I ; ~ ~ ~ , I I I I I I ~ I I I I ~> I I I I I I I 1 ;LLjI 1 I' I I I ~, __ L___~__J___~___1__ I___I I ill ~'._________.~-_~ ;. I I i ~ ~ '~ ) ,I ., - - --- g-5 • 1 -- ~ -- 4 1 IL-~~~ , I _____ ~_-~ ~~~8~ ~~ ~ ~~ , ' ~ ~ ( -., ~ ~T~J it = •` ~~~ ' ~~ ~si~ • ti I • ' 6iEiit! I I! I I E I ' ~ ~ iiii~„t :i_ i ~ _~ I I i; ~ m ~ ~ ~ i ~`~ i l ll' .,e~,~p ~ ~ !eQ••\•• o 1!0, " , ~ 1 • 2 Q ~ 4'' ^ ~ ~! sr ~,i ~ ~! ~? FI! I ' I '• 3~ al ~ ii ~ h ~'9 ; r E a~ ~i Ih ~~Ii !~' ~~ Iii i aj • ; ~ 0 V I I~~i~ ,tl ;~I 66!f lel ~a 9 Q ~C t~ h JW hh I I 3i 4Q - i~ : ~!; O h ~!~` ai V $ _ ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~2 ~, g 9 ~$i ~ '~~ 8i ~ :~ i s - i!I ~liE o :::;;: !ji .o-nm iin:: i •. B'6 ''Iti, • II , v h~ i ~ PI . q I -I i ; Q II _; ;1~i1! If ; 1j' '' -' ( /~ '~I ~~ /l I I ~ II/I ~~ ~'I `~~~' I 1 1 ~ 1 =~ ~I, <\- _ - ~ -f- -' T.Y rt-- Z-T T_ .~1_ 611f1 bl IIaN - C L \~ ., ., -~ 6~~~ , „ ~ ~ 4 ' I'; ~ I I III II ~ \ I II i Ali 41` 1 1I II ~ III it~ 1I ,~ f1 ~ ; ~' c - _.. d1191YJH~3`y_- _ __._-T - --- ~ I • IPo 00!! Vdi' I • ~ \ I ~~ 1 I I < ~ `\ I 1 I1~1~ ZZ J~ -'___ -~ mil' $i I ~`~ ~ ~~J ~ e~ ^,! us ~9 , ~ ~~ ~I -+~' ~I ICJ ~ I~ 1 ~ '~-~ +, ~ ~ ~~ ~! ~ FBI , I;k__ - , 4j r\ ~ V _ I `~ b' I ~ O ___~ i I i ~I Lm-_J~J7 h; p; hi ~v' gi! by l~~ I I ~___ ___ _-- I L ' ± n I I~ I~ 1 r I I-~J I Lv~ -y r Iy~ ,y - --'-- . ~Il-.~ ~ ----- I I~ I t ~ ___ Ilf_____ ~. F_____ _____________-----. T•-~'~'~ ~ 'ffI _ 1 I I L_____ . _____ f i I ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ II I 1 I I I I I I I I I ~ I ~ I I 1 - I I ~___1__,___7__TI __... 3I ~~~~ _~__- _-~ L___~__J___ , B_7 ~i I I~ I I I I I ~~~i ~'~ ,,,1j MINOR EXCEPTION EXHIBIT CITY OF RANCHO I I s PR B. .~f p wALL ' i I ~ ~ ~ GENED - F 3 ./ S 6 7 I 9 ~' PR P ~ . WALL *? I '~l I - - +3 ~ it ~- - I I -- I I r- ~ ~ i i , ~ 15 14 11 11 f0 ~ ~ ~ ~ I 'Q PRO P. 6. WALL i I ' I I ~ ~ 16 25 PR I . ~ 'WALL ~ I I I ~ 13 1f i I ~ 17 ?t ~ 1 I7 ~ I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ I f8 19 20 2Z 23 I , ( ~ ~, I __ PR P I .4' ALL ~ I I II I N _ _ 81~! ~ PROP. 7. ;WALL 5v ( i I o 0 i I o 0 ` ~~ I t~~ A PR P 8.0' ALL I \ ,~ 3! 35 36 37 9 40 I i ~ p PRD . 8.0 WALL ~ I ' ~ \~ ~ ~ - - - - - - - ~ L _ ~ c_ i ~ ~ - - - - - - v ~ --I t; ~ '-- - -, ~ 'o ®? '~' l~ A C 'g' ~ '7 ~ 1 J PVaNNING ENGMEEA~NC- 5UOVEYING MINOR EXCEPTION FOR WALL HEIGHTS a'~ 1095 3 1SIId.II~N AVE., 3U1TE S b ONTAEIO, cA. 91781 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGO a 909-895-0995 909-895-0985 FAX B-$ ~~~~~~~ '' I . DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS , 7 35 p m Emily Cameron June 20, 2006 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17919 -ELBA INC - A request to subdivide 9 85 acres of land into 50 lots in the Low-Medium Residential Distract (4 8 dwelling units per acre), located at the northwest corner of Miller and East Avenues - APN 1100-081-03, 04 and O6 Desion Parameters The property is located on the northwest corner of Miller and East Avenues The 50 lots are similar in size to the~developed properties surrounding the site, averaging approximately 6,000 square feet per lot The layout provided is similar to the Master Planned layout which was presented when Tract 15711 was approved The applicant is proposing Firestone Dnve and Morning Crest Place to continue through the protect creating a connecting "loop" with Streets A and B Existing on-site is a vacant home, which will be demolished The applicant submitted a historical resource asse$sment for the home (51 years old), and the property is insignificant for historic use ' At this time, the applicant is proposing only to subdivide the property and sell to a developer for development of the homes The applicant has worked ddigeritly with staff to provide wall heights and meeting the grading and drainage regwrements on-site The plans have also been revised to illustrate the East Avenue theme wall (for future construction)' There are a total of 97 trees on-site An Arbonst Report was submitted, no windrows exist on-site The Eucalyptus trees were examined and said to be in poor condition One Mexican Fan Palm tree is recommended to be relocated on-site . Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect None -The applicant has worked diligently with staff No mator issues exist Secondary Issues None -The applicant has worked diligently with staff Policy Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion 1 Any walls exceeding 6 feet in height with a maximum of 8 feet in height will require approval of a Minor Exception concurrent with any formal Development Review application for homes 2 The Planning Commission will requre a mix of single-story homes (minimum of 10 to 15 percent) at the time of development Staff will not support a Variance for side yard setback to meet this requirement Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval Design Review Committee Action: Members Present Fletcher, Stewart, Coleman Staff Planner Emily Cameron The Committee recommended approval of the protect as presented B-9 ~ ,,) ' ENVIRONMENTAL - INFORMATI(jN FORM (Part I -Initial Study) C7ty aI Rancho Cucamonpe (Please type or print dearty using /nk Use the pb key ro move Irom one Nne ro tlro nett ane~ Plannng Dmspn (908) 477-2750 ' ~ The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed proJect'so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California' Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Appl~cabon Number for the protect to which this /omi pertains. Tenta4ve tract # 17919 Prefect Title Miller 50 tract • Name 8 Address of protect owner(s). Elba Inc 910 N Amelia Ave ,San Dimas, CA 91773 Name 6 Address of developer or protect sponsor Same as above Contact Person & Address Joseph Bashoura 910 N Amelia Ave ,San Dimas, CA 91773 Name 8 Address of person prepanng this form (d ddferent /rein above) Same as above Tele~~ph//one Number (909) 592014 ~A~~~~ 1 ~ f3-10 Created on 12/152005 5 25 PM INCOMPLETEAPPLICATIONSWlLL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that d is the responsbdrty ofine applrcaM to ensure mat the appbcabon is complete at the 6me o/ submrttal, Ctty stab will not be evadable to perform work raquued to pmwde missrng information ' `1) Prowde a full scale (13-12 x f f) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) whrch rnoludes the protect site. and hrdkate the sde bdundanes '~ 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views ~ the sde from fhe north, soufp; east and west wows rnro and from the site from the primary access pants that serve the site, and representative vlews o/ srgdlfiamt features from the site Include a map showing rotation of each photograph 3) Prged Location (describe) The 10.acre property Is located at the northwest comer of Miller & East 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet dnea3ssary) 1100-081-03,04 06 `5) Gmss Sde Area (adsq ft) 9 85 `5) Net Site Area (rote/ site srze minus area of public streets & proposed ded~cadons) ~ 09 • 7) Describe any proposed general Plan amendment or zone change whrch would affect the prgect site (attach additional sheet rf necessary) NA 8) Include a description of all permds whrch will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga end other ', governmental ageiraes rn order ro fully implement the pro/ect ' Grading tree removal demollUon and construction 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as rt exists before the protect including rnrormation on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trans and roads, drernage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing structures on sde (including age and condrbon) and the use of the structures Attach photographs o/ srgnrframt features described In addition, ate all sources of rnformabon (i e , geological and/or hydrdogrc studies, biotic and archeological surveys, treffic studies) The site slopes from the northern boundary to the southwestern boundary The exlstina elevation along the northern boundary Is 1258 ft and falls to elevation 1243 at the southwestern boundary . The sde Is covered wrath native vegetation and trees Refer to the attached arbonst report for more EnwronmentallnfoFortn B-1 ~ Created on 12/15/2005 5 25 PM Information md~carod by an asterisk (`) rs not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff details on the ve elation and trees • There is an existing house on the site The hofYse v~nll de demolished as part of the protect 10) Describe the known cultural and/or hrstoncal aspects of)he site Gte all sources of mformatron (books, published reports and oral history) According to fhe previous owner fhe sde used to be a vineyard a stage coach stop a citrus orchartl and an egg farm over the last century The structure that may have served the above uses was burned to the • ground approximateN half a century ago and the exact locatron is not known 11) Describe any nose sources and their levels that now affect the site (aucrati; roadway noise, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses , The site Is affected by normal railway noise from I-15 which is approximateN 0 5 miles from the westernmost edge on Miller Ave and approximately the same distance from the northernmost edge on East Ave 12) Describe the proposed protect rn detail rnrs should provide an adequate descnptron of the site m terms of ultrmate use that will result from the proposed protect Indicate d there are proposed phases for development the extent of development to occur wdh each phase, and the anhcrpated completron of each increment Attach addrfional sheet(s) d rrecessary There are no proposed phasing See attached Protect Description for details r1 LJ B-12 EnvironmeMallnfoForm Created on 12/15r2005 5 25 PM ''I I 13) Descnbe the surrwrnding pmpertres, mdudmg rnfomtabon on plants and ~anrmals and any cultural, hrstodcal, or scerlrc aspeds Indicate the type of land use (resrdenbal, commercial, etc ), rntensrty of land use (one-tamely, aparbnenf houses, shops, deparbnent stores, etc) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etC ). North and West Single family residential development on 6000 +/- sg ft lots Over 100 homes total ~ - East East Ave bordenng Fontana Water of Life Community Church center and elementary school. ' South One single family residential adjacent to site Miller Ave and more SFR across Miller m varvmg lot I 14) Will the proposed pro/ecf change the pattern, scale or cherader of the surrounding general area of the pro/ed? Yes The proposed protect Nall convert the vacant native vegetation Into a residential commundy ' • 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to bg generated, mdudmg source and amount Htnv will these • nose levels affect ad/scent pmpertres and on-sde uses What methods of soundproofing are proposed? i Short tens noise Nall be generated by consWction activity Long term noise Nall be vehicular traffic accessing the site - `16) Ind~cete proposed removals and/or replacements of mature orscenrc trees See arbonst report 17) Indicate any bodies of water (mdudmg domestic water supplies) into which the site drams ' None C~ EnvironmentallntoPOrm 8-13 Created on 12/15/2005 5 25 PM I•~ 18) Indicate expelled amount of water usage (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further darrficabon, please oontad the Cucamonga County Water Drstnd at 987-2591 a Resrdenbal (gaUday) 35.250 00 Peak use (gal/Qay) 70.500 00 I b Commero~aUlnd (gal/day/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal Ifsephc tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests expected daily sewage generehon (See Attachment the Cucamonga County Water D~stnd at 987-2591 a Resrdenbal (gaUday) 13.500 00 D CommerpaUlndustnal (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Numberofresrdenbalunrts 50 lathe (md~cate range o/parcel srzes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size _ Peak use (gaUmrNac) ' ^ Septic Tank ®Sewer ~ if discharge to a sanitary sewage system rs proposep rnd~cate Aforusageesbmates) For/urtherdarficatron,pleasecontad Mlnlmum lot s¢e 5,000 s f Maximum Lot s¢e 11 181 s f Average lot s¢e 6,176 s f Attached (md~cete whether units are rental or for sale units) 21) Anbapated range of sale pnces and/or rents Se/e Pnce(s) $NA to $ NA Rent (permonth) $ to $ 22) Spegfy number of bedrooms by unit type NA 23) Indicate anbapated househdd srze by unit type NA B-14 EnvironmentallnfoFOrm Page 5 Created on 12/15/2005 5 25 PM 24) lndroate the expected number o/school children who will be resrdmg wrthm thA proled Goofed the appropnate School D~sfids as shown m Attachment 8 ~ I , a Elementary , b Junror High 80 i c ~ Semor High 20 COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type of use(s) and ma/or hrnchon(s) of commercral, mdustnal,or mshtuhonal uses 26) Total floor area ofcommercval, mdusfial, ormsMubonal uses by type i • - ;~ z7) Indroate hours of operetton ~ ' 28) Number of employees ~ Total ~ , Maximum Shrft ~ Time of Maximum Sh~R 29) Pmwde breakdown of anhapated lob classrficabons, mdudmg wage and salary ranges, as well as an mdroahon of the rate of hue for each dassrficabon (attach addrbonal sheet d necessary) 30) Esbmahon of the number of workers to be hired that currently msde m the City '31) For commercval and mdustnal uses only, mdroafe the source, type and amount of air pollution em~ss~ons (Data should be verified through the South Coast .Nr Qualily Management D~stnct, at (818) 572-6283) EnwronmentallydoFOrm B-15 Created on 121152005 5 25 PM 1~~ ' r ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencre's serving the pro/ect bean contacted to detehrirne them ability to provide adequate sernce to the proposed pro/ect~ If sp, please indicete them response Yes water sewer and fire services are avallalile for the site 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic , matenals txamp/es of hazardous and/or toxic matenals rndude, but are not landed to PCB's, redioacbve substances, pesticides and herbipdes, fuels, als, solvents, and other flammable Oqu~ds and gases Also note underground storage o/ eny of the above Please list the matenals and descnbe thou use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well , as the dates of use, d known 34) ~fl the proposed pro/ed involve the temporary or longterm use, storage Or discharge of hazandous and/or toxic metenals, including but not limited to those examples listed above? N yes, prowde en inventory of all such matenals to be used and proposed method of disposal The /ocebon of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans i~ No I Hereby certify that the statements famished above and rn the attached exhibds present the data and information requuad for adequate evaluation ofthrs pro/ecl to the bestof my abdrty, thatthe/acts, statemerds, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and bekef / furtherunderstand that addrhonal mlomtahon may be regwred to be submitted before an edequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga] Date ' oZ -~ ~ ' 05 Signature ~~f ~t Tdle ~~ -~ZU-i o~ B-16 EnvtronmeMallnfoFOnn Created on 12H 5/2005 5 25 PM .S 'd9 R B w 32'30', ~ i . 'S1 32 - _ JJ° GUASTI QUADRANGLE CALIFORNIA 7 5 MINUTE SERIES, (TOPOGRAPHIC) SE/4 ONTARIO I! OUADRANCLE 'S2 2150000 FEET 151 3 33 PACIFI A I 1 - -- ~ I r ' _~ ~ • _ - •~ .•p iJ~ g / T R A - - •a __ ~ ~~ __. T _ __ ~ t1W871d8 ~~' ° e - -_ ,,~IJOO - , a , - r __ t ,ti M I - - . " ; ` _° - _ - u - 11, _ tl N i-./2)p_ III OJ ~ _ I•. I 'C I I I ~~ - ~ ~ ~ p ~ E ~ ; /n N/LEER AVM w •_ - FO ~ITANA- ~: _I r 1 1 W I I O ~ _ \A . ~ ___ -_ , ~ _ - -- _ i ~ u u r _~- _ ~ o I I <I ~ .~ / n O ~ ~I I CORP /? ! - ' J . f Z I .. ! n - • ~ a ~ Park _ // Bo o _/no ~ ' _~ _ •I r ~•_ 1 ~ e _' ' • ~ __ - 1 ' i > I ~ I IQ I t ~I TE ' C•• "._y - / f5g - ARROW R U ` I ~ p s /150 _ ~ t 3 o ~ //50 • R. WI _ _ _ 1.. .. •; • _ - ~ (Srt3mg) - , ! ~ Rochester ~ '"---'-~ '~ WT 'Water Tank I -~ ~ r'~ ~_ ~~.«~i',.. .~ tiw~ ~='> - B l UPPER FEEDER w _ _ __ ® ® 1 // • !~//I J O }1 ~_~a _ I100~ _ _ 'E -_ ~. - . EEL PLAN7• _ -_ _ _ _ ~ - ~_ - - - - ,q ___ - . 1., I l .4. - voso ~~ u ~ , : ° ... WeII~..L18 / 17-r.. ~_,oeo - {t~~° __ - .. 16 _ - ~ o~p - ~ , ~ water' : % a. , I ¢ '1 - .Well , ~. / Tank _ - qty ~ ¢ 1 2 , rr.~~111 T _ ;'/~105 B~~7 W _ ~ 1 /OSp • \ • ii /pap GA ~ I' CUCA MO N _ '~RP_ _ BDS ^ _ _ _ _ DAR _ _ __ i SAN BERNA N _ - r I AVM i0 e ~ r 8te•Tled(Te °° og; lent =servoir I ~ - Well b~ °`F~j_. a8~ l.. 1 ~ n F I /aJO ~ p' / I o a ~ li I ~se3 o 1 t W 1~ 1 N 1 y ~i~ a^ # -~ ti ~ lW iW °a 'Z ti , ti_ O ti Z N ~ O O t Z ~ ~ r t- d J. H ~ ^' r C ~ ~ --r U H y w y i~ -. t H } L ti }1 L -~ }I Z I 3 1 i ~ 1 ~ r } I ? I } 1 ~ k N N ~ u ~ Ul ~ ' B-18 r F O d N N ~- # r ~~- O ~,/~R rid ~ ~ a-~ s A r,/oRTH -~2 'h~ ,, ~, ~~ ,,,, Ens i , ~1 e-2o ~ ~ ~~ ~~~vr i~ovs~ . ~ 8-21 ILL ~ ~ 1R ~ _ ~ ~~ ~, ~~ . ~ g-22 C ~ rti'Tc R NOIQ i N ' Sc~v~N ~! SQ ~+ ~ ~z g-23 ,h . S~~aTN ~~ • B-24 ~~sT ~! • • ,,y, CJ ~ S ~ ~ ~ ? B-25 ~~s T -~~ i (,J ~S / ~ ~ ''M~ i ' ,~ ~ ~ i` `. '~ 8-26 ~' ~• Y 2: \ .. - ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ;~ - ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM ~~ INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. „Project File: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17919 2. Related Files: WA 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL, ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17919 -ELBA INC - A request to subdivide 9.85 acres of land iMo 50 lots m the Low-Medium Residential Distnd (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located at the northwest comer of 'Miller and East Avenues - APN 1100.081-03, 04 and O6- Staff has prepared a Mrttgated Negative Dectaration of environmental impacts for consideration 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Elba inc 910 N Amelia Avenue San Dimas, CA 91773 5. General Plan Designation: Low-Medwm Residential (4-8 dwellings per acre) 6. Zoning: Low-Medum Residential (4-8 dwellings per acre) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project is located at the northwest comer of Miller Street and East Avenue The site has trees shrubs and native grasses One abandoned house epsts on-site, but is not considered a histonc resource Surrounding land uses include single-family homes, and a church site to the east. The proled slopes gently from north to south 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Emily Cameron, Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVWD -Cucamonga Valley Water Distnd EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PMio -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAOMD -South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct SWPPP - Stonn Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G B-27 Initial Study for '~ City of Rancho Cucamonga I ~~ Page 2 ' SUBTT17919 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY~,AFFECTED, ~ ~, The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at Fast one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact UnlegsP 9itigation Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the followin a es ', x A ricultural Resources (x) Air Quality (x) Aesthetics O g ,, , (z) Biological Resources ' (x) Cultural Resources (x) Geology & Soils ()Hazards & Waste Matenats (x) Hydrology & Water Quality (x) Land Use & Planning ()Population & Housing , (x) Mineral Resources (x) Noise Trans oRationlrraffic ' O Public Services ORecreation ~ O p O Utddies & Service Systems OMandatory Findings of Signrf(cance DETERMINATION ' On the basis of this ~ndial evaluation ~~ ~' () I find that the proposed prolect COULD NDT have a significant effect on the environment A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared , (x) I find that although the proposed protect coudc) have a sigmficant effect on the environment, there agreed toe by thelp olectp oponent A MITIGATEDrNEGATIVEtDECrLARATION well be p spared r () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is regwred , () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially ' Sigmficant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed (X) I find that although the proposed protect could have a sigmficant effect on the environment, NEGATIVE DECLARATIONI pursuant ttotappl cable standardsa andg2) thave beenaavoideld or mitigat on measures that are mposed uponrtheEpropolsed protectA, no hlinOg further sn equ red ns or Prepared By S- I(161 +t~ l~~'~ ~~~- -- Date / ~ Date 7 S d 6 Reviewed By B-28 • Initial Study for SUBTT17919 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 Less il,en Sig,gficent LMf Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potenfielly si0nircem Wfift M,fi~oro Tlun sa~lnwn ra I ecl Inro e0 I I EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS, t. AESTHETICS. Would the protect a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas () () () l/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, Including, but () () () (/) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Hlghway~ c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (/) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments• a~ There are no significant vistas within or adtacent to the protect site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 b) The protect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. c) The site is located at the northeast corner of Mtllgr Avenue and East Avenue and is surrounded by residential development to the north, south, west with East Avenue and the Water of Life Church to the east The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this protect Design review Is required prior to approval City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minim(ze unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The protect will increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the protect site The impact is not considered significant 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (/) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a O O O (/) Williamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (/) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses B-29 Initial Study for SUBTT17919 City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 4 ~ Lass Than I S,gnifitant Less I Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially sign,ticant With Mitigation Than significant I No ~ act Into retatl ~ ect I act Comments• , a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is located at the northeast gomer of Miller Avenue and East Avenue and is surrounded by residential development to the north, south, and west with East Avenue and the Water of Life Church to the east There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance wdhm the City of~,Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and theid economic wabddy is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urbarq uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed proj@ct is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated t b) There is no agriculturally zoned land wi~hin the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) The site is located at the northeast corner of Miller Avenue and East Avenue and is surrounded by residential development to the north, south, and west with East Avenue and the Water of Life Church to the east The nearest agricultural use is less than t mde from the project site Therefore, no adverse impacts are anfiapated 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (/) applicable air quality plats b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to' an existing or projected air quality violation c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () () (/) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of peopie~ Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated B-30 ,, ., Initial Study for SUBTT17919 City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 5 ' Lass man ' Signficant Ie.. ~ Issues and Supportng Information Sources Potentially significant WiN M~ngenon Than signficanl Hti I act Into retetl I , I b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workerg and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated,with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would riot violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are requirefl to be assessed by the South Coast Air Duality Management district (SCAQMD) on aprotect-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation, measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment sh$II be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' ' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. I 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air ~ual'ity Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) 'All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted In SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall Include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. 8-31 Initial Study for ~ ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT17919 , I Page 6 i.8$9 men Sipnificanl Lwa Potentially WiN IDen I Issues and Supporting Information Sources slpndicant , Mmpenon 8lytlfioenl ~° Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if slit is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. Suspend grading operatioris during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitably means. , 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMq and Regional Water duality Control Board [RWQCB]) dally to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCADMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCADMD and RW~CB) shelf be applied to all inactive construction areas ~ that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. , g) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans Include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon the Urban Emissions Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) model estimates in Table 5.6-4 of the General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), Reactive Organic Gases (ROG), and Fine Particulate Matter (PM~p) would exceed SCADMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant rt they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less than significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less than significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to Incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to Incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide Increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State B-32 • ., L~ Initial Study for SUBTT1,7919 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Less men I Slgniflw,t i... Issues and Supporting Information Sources Poleeoelly SiBnihcent wnn MNgaOOn mfln 9piYfloYe NO I Into teo I standards The General Plan FEIR identified the'citywide increase in eihissions, as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The prolect droposed is consistent wittt the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated , d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible ito the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAOMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAOMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts H they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAOMD Rule 1401 e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated • C~ 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the prolect ~ a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () ()' (/) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (/) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act pncluding, but not hmded to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () () () (/) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments: a) The prolect site is located in an area developed with residential and commercial uses The site has been previously disrupted during construction of surrounding infrastructure and B-33 ,,~, , I ,, Initial Study for SUBTTI-7919 City of Rancho Cucamonga I, Page 8 , ~ Less Tfien i 1 Sipni6ceni Less ~ Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potenaally sipn,ficam Wnh MNpeoon Than Significant , No ct Inco te0 1 an I ad developments According to the General Plan ,Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of theGeneral Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sdnsitive biological resources, therefore, development well not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the p{olect is surrounded by urbanizgd land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The prolect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on site, meaning the prolect will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on site As a result, prolect implementation would have no ', impact on these resources ~~ d) The malority of the surrounding area has beer) or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife cofndors that may have existed. No adverse impadts are anticipated ~, e) An arboriculturaf report was preformed ~by Jim Borer on November 4, 2005 The report identifies 9,7 trees on-site The malority of trees,whidh are considered Heritage trees are Red Gum Eucalyptus and Blue Gum Eucalyptus According to the arbonst report, the malority of the trees are in an advanced state of d9cay One tree considered viable, according to the arbonst, is a Washingtonia Robusta (Mexican Fan Palm) The applicant has submitted an application for Tree Removal The following mitigation measures shall be incorporated to mdigate the loss of the existing trees on-site 1) A total of 97 existing heritage trees (as Identified in the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance) that are removed shall be replaced at a ratio of 1 to 1 with a 15 gallon 'I sized tree. 2) Per the Etiwanda Specific Plan, any heritage windrows removed shall be replace in linear feet at 8 feet on center. f) The prolect site is,not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the protect a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred O O O (/) outside of formal cemeteries Comments: a) The prolect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact I~ • B-34 Initial Study for SUBTT17919 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 , ~ Les9 Than Sigmla;ant Laas ' Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially signirwnl With mingaaon Than fHgnficam Na I as Inco rete0 1 acl I b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the prolect~site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or' during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate'measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga will• , Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish Its archaeological value. , , Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a thQme or focal point. , Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse prolect effects on significant, Important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the prolect area. Submit one copy of the completed report,wRh original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of- influence, including the prolect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The prolect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: B-35 Initial Study for SUBTT17919 City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 10 , Less man , sipnlncem Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Polennally S~pnmcanl wun Mn~oaaa, man slmenr~m , rm azt Intro ted I 1 Assign a paleontological monitor, trained 'and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction'delay, to the site full-time during the Interval of earth-disturbing activities. ~ • Should fossils be found within ari area being cleared'or graded, divert earth- disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert Fonstruction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). Submit summary report to City of, Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed protect is in an area •that has already been disturbed by surrounding development No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area. No evidence is in place to.suggest the protect site has been used for human burials The California Health • and Safety Code (Section 7050 5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the bounty Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitiga;ion is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site No adverse impacts are anticipated 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the pro~ecC a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, intury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 ii) Strong seismic ground shakings () () () (/) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including () () () (/) liquefaction iv) Landshdes~ O O O (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () () (/) or that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (/) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property • B-36 i Initial Study for SUBTT17919 Issues and Supporting Information Sources City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Page 11 SIONhcanl t I M WW~ I s~9~ifiennt I No e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (/) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal ' systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewaters ~ ' Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not ni an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is il in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General ' Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 51 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hill Fault, passes approximately 3 5 miles north of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 5 miles north These faults are both capable of produang Mw 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to M„, 7 5 earthquakes, is 15 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas Fault, capable of up to M,„ 6 2 earthquakes, is 17 miles northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhering~to the Unrfonn Budding Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant b). The proposed protect will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils The Rancho Cucamonga area is subtect to strong Santa Ana wind conditions'dunng September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts'to less-than-significant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RW~CB) dally to reduce PM~o emissions, In acgordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW~CB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the agwfer The protect would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechmcal hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Sod types onsite consist of Tutunga Loamy Sand association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The matority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types on-site consist B-37 Initial Study for SUBTT17919 City of~ Rancho Cucamonga i Page 12 Less men , ' SBmfcem Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources a°'e""el'Y SiBrn~cent W~" MiLBah°n m°° SIBNecenl No I ed In°0 2tetl 1 I ec1 of Tutunga Loamy Sand association ;according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipatdd ' e) The prolect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sgwer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the pro/ect a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials , b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset, and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ' () () () (/) or waste acutely hazardous materials, substances, wdhin 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed schooh d) Be located on a site which is inclutled on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, ' would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?~ e) For a prolect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the prolect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the prolect area f) For a prolect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (/) would the prolect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the prolect area g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ Comments: a) The prolect will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state. The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less than significant No adverse impacts are expected B-38 1~ W Initial Study for SUBTT17919 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 Lean Than ' S,gruflceM Lau Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potanuel~y S,gruficanl wah Minpaoon Inn s+ptltcw alo I act Into B4 b) The proposed prolect does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Dmsion that is more comprehbnsroe than any other in the state. The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal regwrements The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce-the potential for significant impacts to a level less than significant. No adverse impactg are anticipated c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the prolect site The protect site is located within 1 mile of the nearest existing or proposed school Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticpated d) The proposed prolect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance matenals site. Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or tllegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an airport, land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The prolect site is located approximately 5 mtles northerly of the Ontano Avport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest pnvate airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles )o the west of the Citys westerly limits No impact is anticipated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster Because the prolect includes at least two points of public street access and is regwred to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fve in the Urban Wtldl~nd Interface area found m the northern part of the City according to the Fue'~Distnct Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed prolect site is not located within a high fve hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the pro/ect a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () () (/) ( ) regwrements~ b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (/) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in agwfer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) B-39 Initial Study for SUBTT17919 City of~ Rancho Cucamonga 1~ Page 14 Less Then I ~ ~ Significant Less i Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potanually Significant w~tn Mmgaaon man S,gnihcent , INo I n Intro ted 1 I ect c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) sde or area, including through the alteration of'the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off`site~ d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) sde or area, inciudmg through the alteration of the , course of a stream or river, or substantially iricrease the rate or amount of surtace runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-sde~ e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (/) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoffs '~ f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () () ' () (/) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps ' h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (/) that would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, intury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp t) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (/) Comments: ' a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) Protect is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWOCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment Prior to commencement of construction of a protect, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, inciudmg site clearance and grading Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation g_40 ., r~ Initial Study for SUBTT17919 • City of,Rancho Cucamonga I Page 15 ' Leas man ' Significant Less ~ Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Potanaally s~pruicant wro~ iMfigenon m.n Sipniscara ~No I Incp tad I I Pertorm inspections of all BMPs Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction protect discharges A construction protect for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit Construction protect proponents are required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction cbntractor will be required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for postconstruction ' operational management of storm water runoff The applicant has submitted a WOMP, prepared by SB&O Inc ,December 19, 20Q5, that identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded sods, entering the drainage system after construction Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system BMPs include both structural anti non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, ' and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent. Constrochon Activdies , 1) Prior to Issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to I Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on- site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be Included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational g-41 Initial Study for SUBTT17919 City of~Rancho Cucamonga I Page 16 ' Less Than , $,q,uficanl Lest Issues and Supporting Information Sources ame"Bally S,gmficanl wlm iNbgabgn rn.n S,gnficaia ' No alt Inm lad I I 5) The developer shall implefnent the, BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WoMP) prepared by SB&O, December 19, 2005, to rbduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system tp the maximum extent practical. ~ , 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for 'controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicldes. 'Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. , b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from ground water in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 ,The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according' to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation; however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development crtywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water'facilities - c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates; drainage patterns, and 'the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-gde The impact is not considered significant d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed • on a site; however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Budding Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is for new development or significant ~~ g-42 • Initial Study for SUBTT17919 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 ~ ma, aa,~rwem uss Issues and Supporting Information Sources so~ficam w ~o~ 5 ,,, i an loco .e i redevelopment, therefore, is requited to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented '~ 7) Pnor to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the Clty Engineer for approval of a WOMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. • g) The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected h) The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected ' The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm dram system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected There are no oceans, lakes or reservoirs near the prolect site, therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debns dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. • 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING Would the protect a) Physically divide an established community () () () (~ b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the prolect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect B-43 Initial Study for SUBTT17919 City of Rancho Cucamonga i, Page 18 ~ ~ bass,naa , . ~ Si9rvficant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources Fotanbaily Si9~ficant wpm Mitl9abon man SIOa~ficant 'INa act Irico tatl I I act c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () () () (/) or natural community conservation plan Comments: , a) The site is located at the northeast corner of Miller Avenue and East Avenue and is surrounded by residential development to the north, south,'and west, wdh East Avenue and the Water of Life Church to the east The protect wilt become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated , b) The protect site land use designation is Low-Medium Residential, which allow the ~' ' • development of, single-family residences in this District The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection As such,,po impacts are anticipated '~ ~, c) The protect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitroe biblogic'al resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Result in the loss of availability of a known ~rhineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () '~ () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact 11. NOISE. Would the protect result to a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (/) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (/) levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect • C~ g-44 C J Initial Study for SUBTT17919 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 Less Than ' &pnificent LMa Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polenbally Significant wnn nbbpetlon Then SlpnlflCYa No I ect Ineo retetl I 1 d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase' in ambient noise levels in the prolect vicinity above levels " existing without the prolect ~' O (/) ,' O ( ) e) For a prolect located wthin an airport la'n'd use plan or, O '~ O O ,(/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or pLlbhc use arport, would the prolect expose people residing or working in the prolect area to excessive noise ievels~ f) For a prolect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, O O O (/) would the prolect expose people residing or working in the prolect area to excessive noise levels Comments: a) The prolect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out Both Miller Avenue and East Avenue are the principal source of noise that will impact the site A preliminary noise study, prepared by Bill Lawson of Urban Crossroads on March t, 2006 found that for Future Exterior Noise Levels, the exterior noise mitigation measures would include a 5 foot to 5 5 foot high noise barrier should reduce the exterior noise levels to 62 0 to 64 0 dBA CNEL, which is lust under the 65 0 dBA required by the City's General Plan Therefore, mitigation measures listed below would reduce exterior and interior noise levels to less-than-significant levels, Exterior 62.0-64.0 dBA CNEL and Inferior 40 4-43 4 dBA CNEL 1) A 5-foot to 5-foot 6-Inch block wall shall be constructed along Miller Avenue and East Avenue upon development of the property. The construction of these walls shall be approved In conjuction with the application to construct single-family homes. b) The uses associated with this type of prolect normally do not induce ground home vibrations. As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the prolect d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6.30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 3) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If B-45 If~ Initial Study for susTTl~s1s City of~,Rancho Cucamonga y Page 20 ~ ~ Lass Then ~ Sipn,hcaM Less ~ Issues and Supportng Information Sources Pofenaally Sipnifcanf With M,tipefwn Than Slpm6cenf ~ wo acf Incro faf9tl I eh ~ xf noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted ~, 4) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by' on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts due to file transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be required 5) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 5:00 p.m. and 6.30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the dgveloper shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport'~land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The prolect site is located approximately 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 21/2 miles to the west of the Cdys westerly limits No impact is anticipated' ` 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the pro/ect~ a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () ' (/) ( ) dvectly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (/) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments: a) The prolect is located m a predomrnantly developed area and will induce a small population growth, once homes are constructed Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area No major impacts are anticipated b) The prolect site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c) The prolect site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated 'f. , r1 LJ g-46 • Initial Study for SUBTT17919 i City of. Rancho Cucamonga I Page 21 , I Lee3 Then ~ ~ Signitlwm Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Sigmtlcanf Wnn Mmgatlon men Si9ndicenf ~ No I aol Into rated I ecf I atl 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the prolect result (n ~ubsta~tial adverse physical impacts associated wdh the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or I physically altered govemmental facddies, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order , to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times pr other I performance ob/ectives for any of the public sennces~ a) Fire protections U O O (/) b) Police protections () () () (/) c) Schools () () () (/) d). Parks ~ O O O (/) e) Other public facihties~ O O O (/) Comments:. • a) The site, once constructed, will be served by Fire Station 173, located approximately 1 mile from the prolect site The prolect will hot require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could _ cause the need to construct new facilities Standard cgnditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes wail be placed on the prolect so no impacts to fire services will occur - No impacts are anticipated , b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the prolect will not change the r pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the prolect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled c) The Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the prolect area Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the school impact fees Wtlh this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant The prolect will be required to pay school fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits No impacts are anticipated C~ d) The site is in a developed area served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located 1/2 mile west of the prolect site The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing factlities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed prolect will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new factlities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the prolected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the prolected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan far which the EIR was prepared and B-47 Initial Study for SUBTT17919 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Less Then Siprceeant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources PrnBn4e1y S,pnlLCant wpm MNpeson '~" &pnIllcYe No I I ea Impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned 13 new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 Square feet, which is in excess of the protected need of 15,540 square feet at build-out of the City. 14. RECREATION. Would the protect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational faallties such that ~ substantial physical deterioration of the facddy would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational facilities or () () () (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the enwronment~ Comments: a), The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located 1/2 mile from the protect site Thls protect is not proposing any new housing In contunctlon with the TentatNe Tract Map, however, future housing is expected Therefore, a large employment generator Is not expected for an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A standard condition of approval will requve the developer to • pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated b) See a) response above 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the protect. a) Cause an increase In traffic, which is substantial in () () () (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e , result In a substantial Increase In either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (/) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm egwpment)~ e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity () () () (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks) n AQ o-~~ Initial Study for SUBTT17919 City of'Rancho Cucamonga I Page 23 , ~ Less Then I ' Significant Lw Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g PotenLelly significant WiN M,ugaaon Than Slynficanl , No act Inco reteo I 1 Comments: a) If the site Is developed with homes, will generate approximately 479 vehicle trips daily The proposed protect Includes the subdivision of property with the potential development of 50 single-family homes According to the Rancho Cucamonga Traffid Model estimates that each home can potentially generate 479 trips dally As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed protect Is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The protect Is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in protect design The protect will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume or congestion at intersections The protect site will be required to provide street Improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fie that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation Na Impacts are anticipated C. b), The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each single-family home site will generate 50 5 two-way peak hour taps ~ In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local turisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement protects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement This protect will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to Issuance of budding permit The protect is In an area that is mostly developed with all street Improvements existing The protect will not negatively Impact the level of service standards on adtacent arterials The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated c) Located approximately 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No Impacts are anticipated d) The protect Is in an area that Is mostly developed The protect will be required to provide street Improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The protect design does not Include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The protect well, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards due to a design feature No Impacts are anticipated e) The protect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access No Impacts are anticipated. f) The protect design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will therefore not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated g) The protect design Includes, or the protect will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) B-49 Initial Study for SUBTT17919 City of,Rancho Cucamonga I Page 24 ~ ~ Less Then I 9grvficent Less I Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g PotemiallY Significam wnn Mmgebon man Signlficenl wo 1 acl Into tetl I I 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. lNould the pro~ect~ ' a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Boards , b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could ~ cause ' significant environmental effects ' c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (/) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which ,could cause significant environmental effects ? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the, () () () (/) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (/) capacity to accommodate the protect's solid waste , disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste Comments: a) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District sewer system, which , has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana ,Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain factlities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits The impact is not considered significant d) The protect is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located B-50 i~i II Initial Study for SUBTT17919 City of~Rancho Cucamonga q Page 25 Less men II ' Sipmhcam Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources POtantially Signilment With Mniga4on Than Sigmhcent I INo I ect IncO 2tetl I act I within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located ryithin City of Ontano, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated '' f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs ~ ,, g) This protect complies with' Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anbapated ' ~~ ~~ 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE ~~ a) Does ~~the protect have the potential to degrade they () () ', () (/) quality of the environment, substan)ially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife,population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or , prehistory b) ~ Does the protect have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerabie~ ("Cumillatnrely considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed m connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) c) Does the protect have environmental effects that will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site b) If the proposed protect were approved, the applicant would be regwred to develop the site m accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere of Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less than significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Gwdelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use B-51 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT17919 Page 26 protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement'of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulatroe impacts is required ~~ c) ~ Development of the site under the proposed Tentative Tract 'Map, with possible home development m the future, would not cause substanCial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study iden)ifies construction-related emissions of ' criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant ifnpact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Addit'ronaily, impacts resulting from av quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts a$sociated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less than significant levels , EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utipzed m completing this Initial Study and are available for review m the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Drnsion offices, 10500 Civic Center Drroe (check all that apply) (x) General Plan FEIR (SCR#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (x) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCR #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (x) EUwanda Speafic Plan EIR - - (SCH #82061801, certified July 6, 1983) (x) Preliminary Noise Study, SB&0 March 1, 2006 ', (x) Arbonst Report, Jim Borer, November 4, 2005 ,' ~-~ L_ ~ B-52 I,y~ I Indial Study for ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT17919 I Page 27 A APPLICANT CERTIFICATION + ~ r ~ I I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Jnitial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have rewsed the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effectg or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant enwro ental Affects would occur r i Applicant's Signature ~ ~ Date Prmt Name and Title. ~°St<.9f~ ~ l~~H~~ ~ !~ ~~~ ~ i . ~ i i 5 4 t B-53 City of Rancho Cucarnottga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The follownng Mitigated Negative Dedaradon is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17919 Public Review Period Closes: August 9, 2006 Project Name: Project Applicant: ELBA INC Project Location (also see attached map): Located at the northwest comer of Miller and East Avenues - APN 1100-081-03, 04 and 06 Project Description: A request to subdivide 9 85 acres of land into 50 lots in the Low-Medwm Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) FINDING • • This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Inkial Study to determine k the project may have a significant effect on the envlronmerrt and Is proposing this Mkigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the prolect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment Badopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact RepoRwlll not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding Is included In the atteched.lnkial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the Cky of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 orFax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. Auoust 9. 2006 Date of Determination Adopted By B-54 p RESOLUTION NO 06-74 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OFTHE CITY OF RANCHO I CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17919, A SUBDIVISION OF 50 LOTS ON 9 85 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTAL DISTRICT AND ETIWANDA SOUTH OVERLAY DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MILLER AND ~, i EAST AVENUES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1100-061-03; 04, AND 06 ~ , A. Rentals. 1 Joseph Bashoura for Elba Inc fled an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17919, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17919 request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 9th day of August 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said heanng on that date All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public heanng on August 9, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a: The application applies to the property located at the northwest corner of Miller and East Avenues, with a street frontage of approximately 696 feet and lot depth of 509 feet and is presently improved with an abandoned house, and b. The property to the north of the subtect site issingle-family residential; the propertyto the south consists of single-family residential, the property to the east is Water of Life Church, and the property to the west issingle-family residential, and c. The application applies to the subdivision of land only, no house product is proposed; and d. The applicant conducted one neighborhood meeting to inform the `surrounding neighborhood residents of the proposed protect and the obtain feedback, and e The proposed subdivision will have a gross density of 5 dwelling units per acre and an . average lot size of 6,176 square feet, which is consistent with the Low-Medium Residential District and Etiwanda South Overlay Distract B-55 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-74 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17919 -ELBA INC August 9, 2006 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts s'et forth in peragr>?fphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows. , ' ~ a That Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17919 is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speafic plans, and ~ b The design or improvements of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17919 is consistent wilh the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and d. The design of the subdivision is not likelyto cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and e Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17919 is not likely to cause serous public health problems, • and ' f The design of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17919 will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision , 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative • Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assAssment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence thatthe proiedwill have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA")and the Citys local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, the City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the prolect would have a significant effect on the enviroriment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intentto adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration b The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds. (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the prolect will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independentludgment and analysis of the Planning Commission Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the prolect that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation • measures during implementation of the prolect The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the prolect B-56 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-74 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17919 -ELBA INC August 9, 2006 Page 3 d; Pursuant to the regwrements of California Fish and Game Code Section 711 4 and Tdle 14 of the Calrforma Code of Regulations, Section 753 5, the Planning Commission finds, based on the Initial Study, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and considenn~ the record as a whole, that there is no evidence before the City that the,proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends Based on substantial evidence, the Planning Commission hereby makes a tleclaration rebutting the presumption of adverse effect as set forth m California Department of Fish and Game Regulation 753 5 (Title 14 of,the California Code of Regulations Code, Section 753.5.) e. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Plarning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Those documents are available for public review m the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Calrforma 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and m the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. ' Plamm~ca Department • 1) A perimeter wall shall be constructed m accordance with the height proposed in the Minor Exception, not to exceed 8 feet m height. 2) All perimeter walls and walls exposed to public view shall be decorative The perimeter walls fronting Miller and East Avenues shall adhere ~o the approved wall design and materials palette approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 3) East Avenue frontage shall be improved per standards of Etiwanda Specific Plan Figure 5-28 and Figure 5-28A. , 4) Street "A" and "B" street names have not been approved by this application and shall require a separate submittal for review and approval pursuant to the Street Naming Ordinance (Rancho Cucamonga Muniapal Code Chapter 12 12). Engmeenng Department 1) The local depression at the catch basin shall not interfere with the residential drive approach 2) Where slopes occur m Landscape Maintenance Distract (LMD) areas along East and Miller Avenues, a 1-foot flat area behind the sidewalk shall be . provided Slopes higher than 6 feet shall have a 2-foot wide flat shelf at the top, along the base of the wall B-57 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-74 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17919 -ELBA INC August 9, 2006 ~ Page 4 3) Retaining walls ~ad~acent to sidewalks shall not have weep holes. Prowde and show on the public improvement plans for LMD grading, alternate' method for relieving hydrostatio pressures Show and label the area drains,' pipe sizes, invert elevations, pipe bedding/bagkfill, point of discharge, etc. 4) The cross gutter in Miller Avenue shall extend the full width of that street. 5) Miller Avenue frontage shall be improved in accordance with City °Secondary Arterial" Standards Frontage improvements shall be installed as follows a) Widen the north half of the street. This will include curb and gutter at 32 feet from the centerline, sidewalk, AC pavement, and 9500 Lumen HPSV~ streetlights along the north side Join to the existing pavement at the west project boundary b) Provide additional traffic striping, signage, and school related signs and legends as required to the satisfaction of the City Engineer including R-26(s) "NO STOPPING" signs along Miller Avenue. c) Install curb and gutter, AC pavement, and dove approach(s) on not-a-part parcel (APN• 1100-081-05). Also the sidewalk if full dedication is obtained. 6) Dedicate additional right-of-way on Mtller Avenue to achieve a total of 44feet, measured from the centerline of the street Dedication shall extend across the not-a-part parcel 7) East Avenue frontage shall be improved in accordance with City °Secondary Arterial" Standards Frontage improvements shall be installed as follows• a) Widen the west half of the street. This will include curb and gutter at 32 feet from the centerline, AC pavement to the centerline, and 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights along the west side Join to the existing pavement at the north project boundary. b) Provide additional traffic striping, signage and school related signs, and legends as regwred to the satisfaction of the City Engineer including R-26(s) "NO STOPPING" signs along Miller Avenue c) Install East Avenue to be consistent with Figure 5-28A of the Etiwanda Specific Plan Use a 5-foot wall set back from the sidewalk for Lots 41, 42, 45, 46, 49, and 50 through the sewer easement. Use a 10-foot wall setback with a low rock wall adjacent to the sidewalk for Lots 43, 44, 47, 48, and 50, south of the sewer easement (wrapping Miller Avenue intersection to end anot-a-part parcel) A low rock wall maybe used for retaining if necessary. d) The East Avenue sidewalk shall be 5 feet wide since portions are wall-adjacent U B-58 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-74 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17919 -ELBA INC . August 9, 2006 Page 5 8) The proposed internal streets shall be improved to the,City "Local Residential Street" Standards (36 feet curb-to-curb) ' a) Provide curb and gutter, properly-line-adjacent sidewalk, street trees, ' and asphalt pavement as regwred b) Provide 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlights as regwred c) Provide traffic signing and striping as required. d) Install standard knuckles per City Standard. e) The storm drain inlet in the internal street is in a sump condition. Accordingly, the storm drain system shall have a 0100 design with two 2 -0100 intercepts 9) Provide City Entry Monumentation, Type "H," at the northwest comer of East and M~Iler Avenues, within the LMD area. ' 10) Landscape Maintenance District Plans shall be provided for Miller and East Avenues LMD Plans shall incorporate attractive, low-maintenance designs, compatible with or transitiomng to adjacent ,landscape areas, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer The maximum slope within publicly maintained landscape areas shall be 3 tot ,W here slopes occur, a 1-foot flat area behind the sidewalk shall be provided Slopes higher than 6 feet shall have a 2-foot wide flat shelf at the top, along the base of the wall Slope widths should be minimized through the use of 30-inch maximum height freestanding retaining walls and up to 4 feet of retaining beneath the perimeter walls Low-maintenance wall treatments should be used. The planting areas for shrubs should have a minimum width of 3-feet clear of wall footings. The trees will regwre wider planting areas as determined by the City Engineer. 11) The site is located within Area 8 (modified) of the Etiwanda/San Sevame Area Drainage Policy Development within the Etiwanda/San Sevame Drainage Area is responsible for the City's adopted drainage fee (master plan and regional), as well as reimbursement to other development or City for the over sizing of local drainage faalities as determined by the City Engineer City fees shall be paid prior to final map approval. a) For the portion of Drainage Areas 8 and 9 south of Base Line Road, the Master Plan Drainage Fee is currently $22,700 per net acre, but subject to annual adjustment b) For Drainage Area 8, the Regional Mainline Drainage Fee is $7,800 per net acre, and there are no Secondary Regional Fees. The on basin t t d d d f . en i or an area-wi e e c) Tract 15711 has provided lan owner of the land is eligible for reimbursement to recover proportionate 8-59 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-74 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17919 -ELBA INC August 9, 2006 ' Page 6 cost of the land and ultimate basin related facilities (outlet, etc) The ' fair share amount has been determined to be $x,000 per acre, which' shall be paid pnor to recordation of )he final map. 12) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunicationsand electncal, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the protect side of Miller Avenue shall be undergrounded along the entire protect frontage, extending to the fast pole off-site (east and west) pnor to public improvement acceptance or, occupancy, whichever occurs first All services crossing MdlerAvenueshall be undergrounded at the same time The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If thA developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement with 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer'to reimbursement, shall terminate. , 13) The developer shall make a good faith effort to process a lot line adtustment that will achieve 32 feet of nght-of-way frontage on the internal street knuckle ' along the not-a-part parcel. Also; if property owner of not-a-part parcel desires, provide a drroe approach Parkway improvements are subtectto City Engineer review. 14) Pnor to any work being performed in the publio right-of-way, fees sha11 be , paid and a Construction Permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's , office in addition to any other permits regwred 15) Provide a Water Quality Management Plan ('WQMP) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and identify Best Management Practices (BMPs) on a grading plan Information concerning the WQMP is online at. www swrcb ca oov/rwocb8 html/sb womp html On this website, refer to the W OMP Guidance document for information on the WQMP. Use the WQMP attachments document to fill out the template electronically and print to submit to the City. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, WQMP shall be finalized and recorded 16) Maintenance of BMPs identified in the WQMP shall be addressed in the protect Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per B-60 ''~~i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-74 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17919 -ELBA INC August 9, 2006 Page 7 " manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. , 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, developer shall submit ,'~ construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment ust Construction contractors shall prowde evidence that low , emission mobile construction equipment wdl be utilizgd, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall alsoa conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by~hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. ~~ ,~ , 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 , 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erpsion over extended periods of time. Schedule actiwties to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during ahd after the end of work periods Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if sdt is carried over to adfacent public thoroughfares or occur as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 regwrements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means B-61 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-74 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17919 -ELBA INC August 9, 2006 Page 8 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) datly to'. reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabdrzers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain mactit-e for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered egwpment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction-Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use. 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be requred to incorporete high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 11) All residential and commeraal structures shall be required to incorporate '~ thermal pane windows and weather-strapping. ~_J Biological 1) A total of 97 existing trees (as identified in the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance) that are removed shall be replaced at are removed shall be replaced at a ratio of 1 to 1 with a 15 gallon sized tree. 2) Per the Etiwanda Specific Plan, any heritage windrows removed shall be replaced in linear feet at 8 feet on center Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction actroities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wdl• Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the Cityto establish its archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage B-g2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-74 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17919 - ELBA INC August 9, 2006 ~ Page 9 Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, impdrtant, and umque,~ prehistoric resources, following appropnate CEQA gwdelines Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory; evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resburces within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) If any paleontological resource (i e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the develop@r will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropnate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall sNbmit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i a ,paleontological monitoring) that maybe appropriate Where mitigation momtonng is appropnate, the Progfam must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing acUvrties Should fossils be found within an area'being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notifythe montor of the find Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropnate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum) Submit a summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce Fme Particulate Matter (PM~o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) -Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by . the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction B-63 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-74 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17919 -ELBA INC August 9, 2006 ' ' Page 10 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to ~ minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes ' , 4) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCA(~MD and RWOCB) shall be ; applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. ~ ~ , Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Achv~hes 1) Pnor to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Budding Official for approval, Storin Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies speafic measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing actiwt~es are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: , a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize sod exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance , program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect wdl be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) Dunng construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must , be used to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site when there , is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site. Post-Construction Act~v~t~es 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified m the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Madole & Associates, Inc dated December 10, 2004, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping Plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use offertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions fora B-64 ''~~, ., PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-74 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17919 -ELBA INC August 9, 2006 ~' Page 11 I~ minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City fqr review and'approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits 7) Prior to issuance of Bwldmg Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City ,' Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a prdlect description and ideritifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system tp the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify thg structural and non-structurab, measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 8) Prior to issuance of Grading or Paying Permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systefn (NPDES) General Construction , Storm' Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtaiged (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Bwldmg Official for coverage under the NPDES General CohstruCtion Permit Nose 1) A 5-foot to 5-foot 6-inch block wall shall be constructed along Miller Avenue and East Avenue upon development of the property The construction of these walls shall be approved m confunctiorrwith the application to construct single-family homes. 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8.00 p.m. and 6 30 a.m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on SuntJay or a national holiday " 3) Construction qr grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified m Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property Ime Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as speafied m Development Code Section 17 02 120. Monitoring at othertimes may be required by the Bwiding Offiaal. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Offiaal within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notifythe Bwldmg Offical If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 4) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible m first phase. 5) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and _ 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a • national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily taps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction B-65 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-74 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17919 -ELBA INC August 9, 2006 Page 12 traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. ', 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resoluton. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF AUGUST 2006. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY pF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST' James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary • I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning' Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the. Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning . Commission held on the 9th day of August 2006, by the following vote-to-wit. AYES COMMISSIONERS' NOES' COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT' COMMISSIONERS' L~ B-66 ,,`~~ • City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION M~ONITORIN PROGRAM Project File No.: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17919 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the (Mitigated Negative Declaration/Environmental Impact ReporC) for the , above-listed protect. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21'081 6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mit~gatiort measure$ are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of {}pproval for the protect. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, vyhat action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported ' . 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible fof the program Program Management -The MMP will be m place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department • 10500 Ciwc Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 B-67 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM SUBTT17919 -ELBA INC Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained rf technical expertise beyond the CitystafPs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to'monitor specific rrntigation 'activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner. 4, the protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP RePortmg Forrn. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specfic phase of development. , 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue regwring no further monitoring will be signdd off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arse regwnng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed bythe protect planner or responsible Citydepartment and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring afterwntten notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implementetl. 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall requre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitorand report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances regwring long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitonng/reportmg plan shall conform to the Citys MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of bwldmg permits B-68 • • - - MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: SUBTT17919 Applicant: ELBA INC. Initial Study Prepared by: Emilv Cameron. Associate Planner Date: 7/5/06 - • ' -. ~ . Air Quality , : ~, i ~~ ti . - , , , _ _ All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of Plans A/C p/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction - _ equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as - per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records = shall be available at the construction site for City - verrfication Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer CP/CE C Review of Plans C 2 shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use - - - Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low - emission mobdeconstruction equipment will be utd¢ed, - _ or that then use was investigated and found to be - infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform _ - to any construction measures imposed by the South _ _ - - Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD) as - - _ - - well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAOMD Rule 1113 - Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or _ high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of Plans A/C 2 noted in SCAOMD Rule 1108 All construction equpment shall comply with SCAOMD CE G Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions - • Reestablish ground cover on the construction sde CE C Review of Plans A/C - 2/4 throw h seedin and watenn - • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 rn 1 of 8 •- •' ... -... - • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large ~ -. - , , areas to erosion over extended enods of time CE C Rewew of Plans A/C - ~ 2/4 • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 work enods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in CE C R f Pl accordance with local ordinances and use sound eview o ans A q en ineenn racbces • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carved over to adfacent public CE C During _ A 4 thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Construction Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • _ Suspend grading operations during high words (i e , W wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with gO/CE C During A 4 Rule 403 re uirements Construction o Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other gO/CE C During A _ 4 - swtable means _ Construction - The site shall be treated with water or other BO/CE C During _ A 4 - sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Construcuon Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily _ _ to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,e) emissions, in - - accordance wdh SCAQMD Rule 403 - - Chemical sod stabdrzers (approved by SCAQMD and BO/CE C During A - 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to ail inactive construction Construction - areas that remain inactroe for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions - Theconstruction contractor shall utilize electric or clean CE C Review of Plans A/C 4 alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 - construction-grading plans include a statement that work - crews will shut off equipment when not in use All residential and commercial structures shall lie BO C Rewew of Plans A 4 requved to incorporate high-effiaency/low-polluting - - ' heating, av conddioning, appliances, and water heaters - 2 of 8 - • - i -___ • ~ ~~ ~ s All residential and commercial structures shall be CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/3 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stepping ~ , Biological Resources A total of 97 existing heritage trees (as identified in the ' CP C Review of Plans A/C p City s Tree Preservation Ordinance) that are removed - shall be replaced at a ratio of 1 to 1 with a 15 gallon sized tree Per the Etiwanda Specific Plan, any heritage windrows CP C Review of Plans A/C _ p removed shall be replace in linear feet at 8 feet on - center - Cultural Resources - - If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developerwdl retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction - activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or = - - preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will _ _ _ Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CPBO C Review of A/D - 3/4 W sites from demolition or significant modification _ Report - ~ without an opportunity for the City to establish its - J archaeolo ical value - _ __ - Consider establishing provisions to require CPBO C Review of A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new Report developments, using their special qualities as a - theme or focal oint • Pursue educating the public about the area's CPBO C Review of A/D 3/4 _ archaeological heritage Report • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CPBO C Review of A/D _ 314 _ conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect - Report - -- effects on significant, important, and unique - prehistonc resources, following appropriate CEQA _ uidehnes 3 of 8 - • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of A/D 3!4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and Report _ proposed mitigation of resources within the protect - area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiwn It any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal CP B Review of A/D _ q fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the Report developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that wtll also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i a ,paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate , the program must include, but not be limited to, the followin measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of A/D q - p egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with Report - ~ mammal construction delay, to the site full-time ~ dunn the interval of earth-disturbm actwdies - Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activties Report elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage _ If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately desert construction and notif the monitor of the find • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for _ _ documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i e , San Bemardmo Coun Museum • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D Review of D - 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected speamens with a Report - copy of the report to San Bernardino County - Museum. ~$ -- - s ~ ~ - _ s GeologicProblems ~ .' ~ - _ ,; ,~ ~ti. ;~., "~r;a-~ ~` r ,a~ r;~-,: ,,~, ; .- , - ~ , -~ . - . The site shall be treated with water or, other BO/CE C During q 4 soil-stab~hzing agent (approved by SCAOMb and Construction RW OCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a CE C During A schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o Construction q emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction - - Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO/CE C Dunng q 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions Construction - from the site during such episodes _ Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO/CE C Dunng A q - RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction Construction - areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to = - reduce PM,o emissions. Hydrology and'Water'Quality a ~ _ Pnor to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C - 2/4 applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, - - _ Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) _ - specifically identifying Best Management Practices - _ - (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants _ dunng construction actroities entering the storm dram - s stem to the maximum extent ractical _ W V w 5of8 - i~ - - - - - -_' - W A . , -.. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included m grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect BO B/C/D Review of plans AIC - - 214 , that identifies specific measures to control on-site and _ off-sde erosion from the 6me ground disturbing achwhes are in~Gated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the follovnng measures at a - minimum a) Specity the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods - expenenced insouthern Caldornia, and b) An inspection _ and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur edher on-sde or aff-_ - - _ sde as a result of this protect Hall be corrected through a - _ remediation or restoration program wdhin a specified time frame = During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags BO or ravel d k BIC/D Review of plans AIC 214 g i es must be used to prevent discharge of - debris or sediment from the sde when there is rainfall or other runoff, - Dunngconstruction, to remove pollutants street cleanin CE , g ll b B/C/D Review of plans A/C - 2 wi e pertormed pnor to storm events and after the use 14 of water trucks to control dust m order to prevent - - - discharge of debris or sediment from the sde _ - _ The developershallimplementtheBMPsidentifiedinthe CE B/D/D Rewewofplans AIC - _ Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP) prepared by - - _ 214 - Madole & Associates, Inc. dated December 20, 2004, to _ _ - reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm _ - - drain s ten to the maximum ractical - - Landscapingplans shall include prowsionsforcontrolling CE BIC/D Review of Plans A/C _ 2/4 - andminimizing the use of ferfil¢erslpesficidesMerbiades - Landscaped areas shall be mondored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and - stable growth Plans for these areas, including _ mondonng provisions for a mimmum of iwo years, shall) - _ _ _ be submdted to the Cily for renew and approval pnor to' - - - - the issuance of radin ermits ~ 6 of 8 to Pnor to issuance of Bwlding Permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C _ _ 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WOMP, - includmg a protect description and identrfy~ng BMPs that _ , will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the Cdy of _ - Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 Pnor to issuance of grading or pawng permits, applicant BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with - 2/4 obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant - Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water - Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's - Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City - Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General - _ Constructon Permit. - - - NOISO .• .f ., ,c, ~ ;' r ;~`- _'y q %,vlr-M~w '.~. '~ ''~ 'Y :~" ~i-` i;S ..~~" y;.-'~~. ?~„i - _ , , , A 5-foot to 5-foot 6-inch block wall shall be constructed along Miller Avenue and East Avenue upon B0 C During q - - _ 4 _ development of the property The construction of these - construction - - - wallsshall be approved in contuction with the application - to construct sin le-famil homes _ - Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 - hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, Construction - including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holida - 7 of 8 W J m ... - -- .. , - Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the . CP •. C .. standards specified in Development Code Section During Construction A _ - - 4 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Bulding Official wdhin 24 - hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify - the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above- standards, then construction activities shall be reduced _ - in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise - standards or halted The perimeter block wall shall b e constructed as early CP C D as possible in first phase uring A A Construction Haul truck deliveries sh ll t t k _ a no a e place between the POGO C During q - hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, Construction _ 4n _ - including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a - national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for _ - _ hauling would exceed 100 daily taps (counting both to _ - and from the construction site), then the developer shall _ _ prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any - - - - consTruction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, _ - - the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass _ - sensdive land uses or residential dwellings - Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person ' Moriit .ing`Fn3guency Methtsd'of VeC[ft~etlari• "' '' Sanctions ' CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection - - 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map- CP -City Planner or designee B - Pnor To Construction 13 -Other Agency Permit /Approval - 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - Crty Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certficate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds - FC -Fire Chief or designee ( 6 -Revoke CUP - t 7 - Citatton I ~of 8 • ~; + '~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT '~. ~ DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS ' PROJECT #: SUBTT17919 ' ' SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (50 LOTS) ' i APPLICANT: JOSEPH BASHONRA LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF EAST AND MILLER AVENUES' APN. 1100-081-03, 04, AND O6. I i, ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO FOUR PROJECT. 4 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements ~. ~, 1 The appllcant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Clty, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The appllcant shall reimburse the City, its agents, offlcers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the Clty, Its agents, offlcers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at~its sole discretion, participate at its own expense In the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. v.P-'~ B.- Time Limits This tentative tract map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map Is filed with the Clty Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which Include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first •C-1-OS 8-77 Completion Date ~~- 4 ~~- ~~- ~~- I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res 8 Stl Rpt\SU8TT17919Std Cond 8-9 doc Protect No SUBTT17919 Comolehon Date 3 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all ~~ other applicable Clty Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at thQ , time of building permit issuance ' 4 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be ~~ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director Foy gingle=family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 5 Street names shall be submitted for Planning director review and approval in accordance with the _/~_ adopted Street Naming Policy pnor to approval of the final map. 6 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Ihcorporation of the ___/~_ Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Englneenng Departments and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or ; prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be pjovided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 7 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all ~~_ lots for Planning Director and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing forcommunityconcerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing D. ' Environmental 1. Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of ~~ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director In the amount of $495 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertormance • and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit E. Other Agencies , 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/_/_ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structuref0r - "- mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval pnor to the issuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) F. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following ~~ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, • B-?8 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stt Rpt\SUBTT17919 x Project No Sl)Bl-r17919 Comoletron Date b Foundation Plan, ~ • ~ c Floor Plan, and Roof Framin Plan d C din , g e g e Eledncel Plans (2 sets, detached) inGuding the size of the main switch, number and size ~ of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, , f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, inGuding isometncs, undergrqund diagrams, waterandwaste diagram, sewer or septic system location, focture units, gas piping, and heating and air ' ~ conditioning, and g. Planning Department Project Number (I e , SUBTT17919) clearly iderrtfied on the outside ' of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. _/ /_ Archited's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required poor to plan Gteck submittal. 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverege _/_/ _ to the City poor to permit issuance 4. Separate permits are requred for fencing and/or walls ~ ~ _/ / 5 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements G. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved poor to construction All plans shall be _/ / . marked with the project file number (i e , SUBTT19719) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Califomia Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts ~ 2 Pnorto issuance of building permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant _/ / shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may inGude, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Perrlit and Plan CheGc Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and Sdwol Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department poor to ~pertnit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after trect/parcel map ~ _/ / recordation and poor to issuance of building pernrts 4 . Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6'30 a m Monday / / through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays H. New Structures 1 Prowde compliance with the Califomia Budding Code (CBC) for property line clearances / / considenng use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the Califomia Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3 Roofing matenal shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions _/ / • B-79 11PLANNING\FINALiPLNGCOMM12006 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT17919Std Cond ti-9 doc )' Prgect No 8Ut3TT17919 ' Comoletion Date I. Grading ~ i ' 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with Callfomla Building Code, City Grading ~~~ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan 'shall be in substantial conformance wdh the apprgved grading plan 2 ~ A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to ~~ perform such work ' 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the ~~_ , time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, ~_/_ ' submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior tb the issuance of building • permds ' 5 A~ separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for ~~_ ' existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Callfomla registered Civd Engineer ` APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENt, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. ~ Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of sway on the perimeter streets (measured from ~-J street centerline) 44 total feet on East Avenue ~ ~~ 44 total feet on Mtller Avenue ~~ 2 Comer property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. _/~J- 3 The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the regwred off-site property interests ~~_ necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to doso, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Sections 66462 and 66462 5 at such time as the City decides to acqure the property interests regwred for the improvements Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City if the City decides to acquire the off-site property interests regwred in connection with the subdivision Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit In the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal This condition applies In particular, but not limited to not-a-part parcel on Miller Avenue K. Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (interiorstreets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped _/~ areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees • 8-80 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\21H16 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTr17919S1 by ~ Protect NO SUB`IT17919 , Comolehon Date C J 2. Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service,equipmentwhlch Is regulated by technicbl codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that'In developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or, units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development 3. Construct the following perimeter street Improvements inclutling, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter A.C Pvmt Slde- walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail ~ Other ' East Avenue X X X X X (e) Miller Avenue X X X X X Notes (a) Median Islar)d includes landscaping and,grigatlon on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an In-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item (e) East Avenue parkway and theme wall Including Landscape ~, Maintenance Distract #9 Improvements , ~ , 4. Improvement Plans and Construction a Street Improvement plans, Including street flees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered CIVII Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the Clty Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer and the Clty Attorney guaranteeing completion of the publlcand/or private street Improvements, prior to final map approval or the Issuance of building permitsi whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertormed In public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Clty Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required , c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be Installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and Interconnect wrong Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the Clty Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at Intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the Clty Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-Inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of Intersections per Crty Standards or as directed by the City Engineer i B-81 -~-~- , ,,, ~-~_ ~~ _/~- ~~- ~_~- -~~- I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMNI\2006 Res 8 StI Rpt\SUBTT77919Std Cond 8-9 doc Project No SUBTT17919 Completion Date f Existing Clty roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential tots , h Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be instalied pqr City Standards In accordance wtth the Citys street tree program ' Install street trees per Clty street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The dompleted legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street Improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typlcally sheet 1).° Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Siza Gly. East Avenue Eucalyptus Red Gum '6' 30' O C 5 Gal FlII Foreground Tree camaldulensis ~ In 'Specific Plen dictates species despde parkway width Miller Avenue Aligns with Church P A 8' or more Magnolia grendrflora NCN 6' 30' O C 15 Gel 'MalesUC Beauty' P A less than 8' Magnolia grandrflora NCN 3' 20' O C 15 Gal 'St Mary' Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soli amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only L. Public Maintenance Areas A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District Miller Avenue and East Avenue frontages, (Landscape Maintenance District #9) Public landscape areas are required to Incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble or other acceptable non-Irrigated surfaces ~_~_ • ~~- ~~ _I-J- ~~- /~_ ~~- r 1 LJ B-g2 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMMt2006 Res & Stf Rpt\SU6TT179195 ~ h' Protect No StIE~TT17919 Comoletion Date ~ , 3 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the approprlete Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Clty Engineer prior to final map approval or Issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 4 All required public landscaping and Irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by The City M. Drainage and Flood Control A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the Clty Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as requred by'the City Engineer ' N. Utilities ' 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanrtary sewerage system, water, gas, ' electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utlllty Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the_ Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Flre Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compllancefrom the CVW D Is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance bf permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the Issuance of permits In the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be receivedfrom them ' O. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map Is involved 2 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to bulldmg permit issuance If no map is Involved 3 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable rf at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation Is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED B-83 ~~- /~_ ~~- ~-J-/. ___/~- ~~- ___J~- ~~- ___/~- ~~. I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Sd Rpt\SUBTT17919Std Cond 8-9 doc •I ~~~°~~0~ 4P 4~~;~!~ c9 ~1 FIRE April 27, 2006 Miller & East Avenue NWC Miller & East Single Family Tract SUBTT17919 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply ~~ 1. Design gwdelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants. a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants insingle-family residential protects is 500-feet No~ portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than• 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet. ' b. Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: i. At the entrance(s) to a commeraal, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways ii. At intersections. ui On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv As regwred by the Fire Safety Diwsion to meet operational needs of the Fire District. v. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any bwlding. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The regwred fire flow for this protect is 2000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20- pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the regwred fire flow subiect to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adiacent property shall not be used to provde required fire flow 3 Firewater plans are regwred for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 13-84 District t On all site plans to be submitted for revew, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed prolect site FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes regwre approved Fire District vehicle access and water supply from'a public or private water main system before construction FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method' form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee FC,S-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Faalities District #85-1 or #88-1 is requred prior to the issuance of grading or bwlding permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the Issuance of any,building permits: 1. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems• The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot raads of the protect. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard #9-8 2. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements bf the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 4 Fire Flow. A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCW D and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. Public Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street. When bwlding setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry B-85 ~~ ' I ' ~ 1 i n ~ I 1 b \ ' 1 I - ~ 1~ ' ^ T H E C I T Y O F ~, RANCtIO CUCAMONGA . Staff Report DATE: August 9, 2006 TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM• James R Troyer, AICP, Planrnng Dire~ptor BY• Lou LeBlanc, Assistant Planner ^ SUBJECT. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ~~ AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17651 - TAVA DEVLOPMENT COMPANY - A request to subdivide 41 acres of land into 56 single-faYndy lots within the Very Low Residential Distract (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located on the south side of Banyan Street, approximately 1,220 feet east of East Avenue - APN 0225-191-012 Related Fde: Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00174 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. , ~, PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION• , A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North -Very Low Residential South -Very Low Residential East -Very Low Residential West -Very Low Residential B. General Plan Designations Protect Site -Very Low Residential North -Very Low Residential South -Very Low Residential East -Very Low Residential West -Very Low Residential C. Site Characteristics. The vacant site is surrounded to the south, east, and west by undeveloped parcels The parcel has sparse vegetation and mature Eucalyptus trees on-site The parcel is pnmanly flat and drains to the south. ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT17651 - TAVA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY August 9, 2006 Page 2 ANALYSIS A General The Very Low Residential District requires a minimum neY lot size of 20,000 square feet and a minimum average net lot size of 25,000 square feet. The applicant is proposing a minimum net lot size of 20,133 square feet and an average net lot size of 25,053 square feet The protect site is also located within the Equestnan Overlay District that requires a trail system The applicant has designed the protect so that each lot is adfacent to a Local Feeder Trail and can accommodate a minimum size corral of 24-foot by 24-foot and be in accordance with the applicable Development Code setbacks. .The Tract Map provides Local Feeder Tratls within the proposed protect and a Community Trail along Banyan Street, proposed, °E" Street, and proposed "F° Street. The applicant has designed the Tract Map to allow access for adfacent property owners to the east to gain access to Banyan Street through proposed "A" and "E° Streets. No homes are proposed at this time and will be subfect to future Design Review application. B. Desion Review Committee The Design Review Committee reviewed the Tract Map on April 18, 2006 The Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Coleman) recommended redesign to provide swtable access to the developable parcels to the east The revised tract map was reviewed by the committee (McPhail, Stewart, Coleman) on July 18, 2006', and recommended approval of the project as revised C Technical Review Committee. The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project July 18, 2006, and recommended approval subfect to the Standard Conditions outlined m the resolution of approval D Trails Adwsorv Committee. The Trails Advisory Committee reviewed the project July 12, 2006, and recommended approval as proposed E Environmental Assessment• Pursuant to the California Environmental duality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Gwdelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the protect. Based on those findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to environmental impacts that are mitigated, there would be no substantial evidence that the protect would have significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A mitigated Monitonng Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and in compliance with, the mitigation measures for the protect Tree Removal Permit• A total of 74 trees are proposed to be removed per the Arbonst Report (Jim Borer, Certified Arborists No. 496) The arbonst determined that the majority of the trees are m an advanced state of decay The Etiwanda Specific Plan allows removal of the trees with replacement at a rate of 50 linear feet per acre of new on-site windrows, therefore, a total of 2,050 linear feet of new windrows are regwred on this 41-acre site. C-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT17651 - TAVA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY August 9, 2006 • ,Page 3 CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Vallev Dady Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the protect site ~ ,~ RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17651 and related fde Tree ~ Removal Permit DRC2006-00174, by the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions Respectfully suDbmitt~e/d~~,[/~~ 1\ - t;~' - Jam s R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director BB LLB\ma Attachments. Exhibit A - Vianity Map Exhibit B - Site Utd¢ation Map Exhibit C - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit D - Grading Plan • Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17651 C-3 Y ~P 3 ! .Fi ro I g w '! : ~ $~'" " '~~ n.m. a ~y ° IS a 3 i or p Jy_'_ ~aE~m ~'+'-~'-~m I-t.:N c4~n~` '3 `"` ~ l '„'amet.°d`~r", ~°'``."'. afi ~ % i ' . ~ ~ I,` t ~ - a=vn6 _ = J. _ - , x=' J a a _ _ ngme~ P.v .1 a P q ,aa. s C/lVh i e Q ' ~ ~ D1ID ~, Y w111 _ _ YCp~ -_ - _ _I- _ B@I~P ~y ~5 tw5s]wuu- [ ~ LL ~ ~ yr ` Z , ~ IJI, m ~~w; ~ PA ~ q -[iiR ~fl ~! ~'~ ~ pJ~ . ¢[ [ CGC~~~ ^Il4~6;n EI ~EE~ rY °~ a a ~ fA 1§" c~ Ct~i tv ~ :.m.s ~ ~ i m%_~_T 41!. i `~ ~^; ~ r u t I I~ " ~ ~~1. !m I p ~i -{ ~ w.IC FR ~°'"~'lei~ ^""°~q I 3 iY ~t `' ~it a ' " a3 a P ~ ~ o4o It R3RV~°~-~1 ~ [ ~1 „ a ' .m m - stP , y ~ ro I nr artoL ;; ~j Y CREEK ' _ -P "la ~ 4s IE R , - xa>c a j°X"1°~ ° t x vertu m ~ u~ ¢ m+'n ~ K ~ i ~ „ n aft-"~-__.~$LVU3 5c p _Y.la. ; A m n:. &~a.5le" c i ~'< • ~ _1, q n,P:c niR i i • -a`° y ~ ~ 3 A5 auA. ~E g 5 im + B $ a` a ~ ~ A roR,m ms.- I~ S.= Mtara R~ , art+P ~ma d' • If ° pl. ~nn:~i z , . C O~:Y. I n, v A e ~ [§ wo-u I -uul4 I ~^ ~ ~ R I 3~'m 4 Y;l ~ ~ s ~ ( Y p roP s 3 mwr ~ al Eqi ~ I f sa b Lv o 3' t I, „ „~i @ j EI~~L~'`, Ti. ~ t, aS~-A~~m ~\`~ :fi .c- Quc~_ ~~~3~'~ y„1 y~ ~ ~I%v~ Gy_ S I vs_3eW_fe_,Ats ~~"Ib wS' a ~ ~ ~~b~ ~+O iii t!__- ~ ~ i _ a T Pltu~:¢}'C yp _ je` lj t 3 b ~ yt a. .:rvi'4 £_~1 U e~ t .,'Sy' i~ ]wmm F I ~: IS5~Er~,,~~ Li ~`-V' YY ._ Y OA u v _ ~ ~I lgiA ~ Npls Y R i! F ^ n c, ~~ Yym 1 s_ a '' 1 111 Y 3[ - ,~ , .. 'VAIHm ~ e ~~ 4, 3 ~~ ~ . - ~ i~loy{ C I In ~ o H• s ~ Rig T ° 6 ~ [~ rtW - .sA. ~I t~ mL b {p ~ Q ti :A~ip~Y~ ~ oozL : » ~ ~ -~ L<m ~ bW - _ryr G',s ~ ~.f IV . -' `pi me°t ali L~ ~OC[N}tlt v L , ns ^~ i R .8n I' V r I a; XtlL7lA AI mLLi. t i 'A\ F t j/ ` i /. 'eT F L M INI Yl _ G. 'i ~5 '. tiiwr`~ Om N _ w R m.001 1 ~i , tm. i 4, I , i fllY wl ~' l1 F \ d y ~ ~ r ° ~ `'~~ iie~ls+.-=119 , ^_ Ry 1 L ` < ~ I,~19 p o -s =~ a~nJ Lic ~ ~1~'~ P~S~=Y~ v ~ m_n_ I {/ . ~ J~aM ,6 g~~ ~ ~ ~J ~ ~ms"soneF[~ KS oT~"' ~ m ~~ / . ~ { lm ~G I 'l.4 •~ n.A ~ PNr''~ ~. C ' : i 0.4~uoLLa w~X nILU9 ~N ~AV t ~~ i5 ~ I , p ~5 C ''~]~-~/~i' w -- ~; '1w! Ar _ _ gM YO IJ~oq ~ ~ - .. . ~ y ~ _~. r 1, 1 ~~ ,p~~ I ~ ~ 'g i~ >iM1AI ; >• !a ~ -~--ne° ~ ~01t' ~ LO {. ~I` Y^ ~s ® P Q A5' ~ u f 22 I .L.,V A'in ~ R I __ F P - PEfJA (~ AYi ~ , yY iE ' _i ' ~ r 1 __-__ _-_-_ 1m}y .© ~ I YfUA _ AY_ ! ,~ _ Ep1 3i R - 8 ~,~ _115 _ M~~v P " - 01 ` p ~ ~ ~ HI I ~r p~ 1 t-~~ ~~i R Q 0. i -~ ~ ~l A. AY NI ~ p~ ~mPl n g ~ i / / . AY r^ ~ / ^~ _ CCC ~ ~ t ~ AV i O I ~~-_ - s.r , $m ~ ~ li aE3T -. Ri la 4 _llm9 R AV ~ hl eam e++4r ^F. f I ~ ~ _ Ff L ~• ~~ ~~ '- I / ~WRm~ ~~'~ q._ T 3 'r, ~ ~ i ~y • `2 ~ ~ __ f ~ YI ~ m ~ Z ~, [S P ` I C IOltl I ~ ' Q~1 ~ , 1 / II ~ / 1, . C ee S A~-m sa~ k ~~ ~ 7K>7~n x4._ "c" d .'.YIYr '.. w Aw`- t ~, €~ '°Ab ~ r c mbY,a.~j; If n G ~~i. y%~L 'Yy'~- Ln4, T n ~f~ ~ -R`,I/~ ' 1, f l • / `III*Y. ` ~ 7 a r?i/O''<" - •rt, ~ w, Y 1um .utn I „ L ~ t ~ /O ,lV aSAb N.~' k$1 '/IU'M 4.M° 0 ~I 1.Ed Y•~ ~ ~ ~t ~ .. „ t .'~r~l 4 I I11 \ ~ \_} ~ M I , J,, ' p -__- y~!'__'-__ o I. o ~ ~' i f mu R ~ a ~•>a pfr4v~1" /~s~ @~ ~~`~'~m%~¢ l E~ Y~ l °o 1A 1 ~' ~ o :t` .,L~~-.,,4~v 8„""'."~ ~~ ` ,~ I ' ~ w _1 ~ r ~ ~ ua mq'PR Wc_w --~ 9 ~.°-Yl-r~#=-pr~''~,°~'b y ~' ! $$ ~ g~ ~ AI p ~o ~a~ "' 4w ,A ' Tn' r~ ~ ' .v \3 4 ° Y ®~ :4~ ~ ~ _ _ !l -n J=1 l~ Ra 1 ~ ~~~rt~ ~ `d'-°"- ~`~ },a ~~ \ ' ~ I\ ~ v 3 ~ ~ IfQ gp ~ + 6 5 ~ Y4V-y ~~~ O o' 9 L 9f r'a m` CL~J` ~ .1 T y -S V l". 4.y~ \n fY~'p. _i}.Y $i' Ss~Y~ LEA ,C' (.4 Y ~` /j+r~ :i...`', ~`L .S.X' 1" " ~ ~ ^ BMWM ~ AY Lai ~^ _. F Yn".lY" _S }t~.'~~W ~~ i~~s_ I ~ _ I 1 .-_ 11~' S'r }e4 t1`1 I I 1 ` I ' T1FYIt1LY'g ~~ ~f VL Mw ~4V ~ b I Y< '~ > b '. ~ d,V°'" V' irvffa..t I ~_~ P.~~ r 3 ~i Q~ R ~~ fi IYYY 1 W L 1 Y s! i l Z^ `yap ~ ~~ `e M f~tc~. (: 1 K~ ~~{.~ a ~P., .h 0 ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~~ 4 ~"i; ` i .. ~ 11 i.A ~ S - ~ r 1-01 0. ~ 9 ~ I 6 - ~MIM 9 SW F ., ~ JFV.11q b` I i+n ^ " ~ .<~ ` iun g~ g•¢ < e r ~ ~' ` ' ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~.' s..~ ~~ ~~ ~ n _ E~ .1, r ~ ~ - •F I' ~ .. a 0, I ' '1 I~15N~YYAtIrt.Al i I 9 I}-~ Fq k~ -_ ~_.;~ - ~~q~ Zup.3' A .i m E~ + 'Y <'r3•..~•° N„ A AY- ~~-N T 1f~~YP ..~ .1 SI ~ V x.. ~p+~y~y~.. .a_a'r~ t ~~ '~-'.Y3g1 ~ '~~`ti s i. • .. ~s'= R ai 3 °+N :I 1 ~T- ^E4-f i ~ l ~ Y ~ J-T T~_'T"I" T ,____ - h-_ _ ~ j t o i Y~ f ~} .C y~tyti~~~ G ~t ~` 3 '2Y~ -T ~'94 ~l Rl C9 h '- f' J yy Y~ k' WN`.~~j(~ ' `I C/! • !~ j ; ~ ~ t, ~ I Y ~% 1 - 7 ~ ~ ' ' SIC t . ?+3 ~ aA a<.~ A i a~~ ..;~. 'F^-'Y~FY~ 'J~ r>' yr_^s x ~ .~ ~ d' AT; A. r ~. ~b ~,xi ~ >' ':=~+i ~ ~1-`.~'~~Y.ll ~`~ " L1iENRY_' ti t, +C `~ --- - ~ ~ • SS~_-- _ ~=r-~-v ~ 1 w~-'71 x~ V mui-T c'Qi.n ~..~ AVa,S: :EA~ CHERR J. Yt '::"-,evz'- 'cASm1i4 °I,~' aK F;w;y .s :esv. I ' j 'y"^~~'~i.._ '`i # ^ s:w "; ''h ~. E`' 1' 19= lm[' ?ay ;, r"m5 I~ :~~ai4,Pw.:, r, ~ q m1i0iEeA arspp ` .:@ tl -~ .~ .f' ~ t;.~ ~1 '~ ~UI ' [ -`,~'•., ~~- f~~.''~~ C r 9 ~ y . ~] Obl~. /'~L ^-' l °x;: ~`. ' I ~. ~ f rw ~ ~ ~ . .,. ~ , y..~y .- '1 4;L~s. . ~ . ~I_ ` F-. ~ '~ ~ _ _ +m:. rOy.. ~`Cv_1 Mro.wa B i £tY "~', 3'3 ~~~~ 9 F 3 ' I ~. tli ' ~' `I . ~ ` 'II 1 ,.X P~ CMtq A IYIIA fi 1" +.~P L ff r ~}p5 y Y : ~ : ^,"3 I .~k ~~y~'~ e i . a W ,.~ 2 I 1 4 ~ ;e~. _ ~.'. ,. F r. i ` J' ~ ~. . , " .. r ^ , . wle p { p i X. {E .~yb, Ln 4 ~: Y i nrt a `a`- a H ~ 5 ~ I l ` ~ - ~M a ,'b"E ` 35~i~i ' e~,..ym„.r_ I ] ' F k ~ r. - . ~~ ,Sfa1N~ p~.>'v~ ._. :1c-:? + < ~ E •z'k^ ~. ~ - ~_ - q ~ U ' 8"w~ b'„ ~S ~H $ 4 1 ' _ r Ay4~ 1 : Lt _ ' q ro e ,A -'•IN/A1 '~.!.['- ,~'lH~ ,~YxE~ i ' 'L! - LY'= ~-~Tl y.a "Ti++ I~ ~J-''~~•Ai _ P. ar 1 4, J. r _-. _? N~rtp,'µ! m , = ryyJL ~~_ e• 'K, . S ti 9 V , ~ !L.. 3 LIYI ~[. I , ~'+`4i; a, ~. ,~. , I ,~-au, m M~.~I ~~+. i.-.nw~,(~"p ~~_ V ~ ~'AA V • ^- a .s 2-~4_' 2w YY ,f l N~j2YESi~ :AV= WdVIIAfyW ~J,1 M_y r _. ~ ^k ~y1r:F";".rte _ IP_l~ YII aS(Y.LIR.."' Y-~ rr plqq 4Y' l (LMY`tR~'T~Y~' 1 . .. , ~ _ sul`_ f{11 ~, ti•. ..~' ~'~' nl~.tt._'~ Y U Evau¢ _ , t^mRG lt_a r't1 ' q ttM ~iq ! [ ~C i G Y " ~ -S ,9r<"' , _ J ~I .b NMI, ~~~ a'~"] .K il. -In ~ " ,~~~.+: ,wnis ~ nnmlwl U r ~ ~_Ps} A ~ -,',56 ~P ~, ~~ ` ~n I ~ ' ~•` IaLA~1 ~~ ~ ~ ~u i~ `>n 1 ~ L~ ~ Q~W ' g~~a@ae:= II'~Y=1 s ~" ~i ~lp~oL) n ~W(( ~ br .. .Z ' " ~m-°:. s : ~~-`~r ~ , _ Ii n o , .'-* ~t i, .,. ,. .Y " s •a.t 4 _ 1 -•, { yy ;~ ~ ~ ~ ^ ( 2y ~ is !III ~ ~1~~~IC~ ~s?.P. ITiJ i-~ . n d~ { j R a Li.UIX AA ~F~4 u ~ lua' W~ ~c Sa ~V i., ~e i(. 1 'ta ~ ; h rS 9 + AY ~ .D . ~ . n raniw ~~ I q ~ . Er E t ~ gg IYf9hpp5l rp ~>i~p Y„iu `<"~ C Y~ RI "' •r' c •- l :' J ~ ~~A a Nf1l~X IY AV P_. :" ~ .- . p _~ _~ S i-1=:5 ~ ~a. r, x 1 . . c ~ „ ~ . _ , _ , l r H r - 1 - r n 7_ ~- e pi __ GI 71 j ~ ~ sc€ ~ ni' ~~3;, i ui l ":>'„ ` f>~;"w,-1. ` - .er LL ~ ' ,.r ~ ~ Y` L I iw~~ -.~ y~i Y ~J _,~~.ls~~L•; Tti .IS~ qy lu v0 ___^IwIRt `~ Bi L r® Lp a+nv:Y: lmunu_ I .G YCi3 fM4p1_ f F ~i'ID - ..,+ el r, ., n,~`. ~mlu..~ ;~. -~ - ` ~ ° ti; _ L' qG ` . _ _tl' n"^ Y'~~'. m u'°.tm c,RrF 2 w -n is 9mm u'%y iei~Pj. o ,s r<rn ~ ~ _- : : ~f~Ibl_ I ~i _ ~_ ~_AY~ .t" "-.~ iry, 7 ~~~~ ~'• - OfL01 ~ AY ~' ~ T~v n'ii I~ n%a~:9i ! _ _ ' _ 3 , _wwilL__ f" >- "~s4 _. _+~"-Y ' 10~°qe { _ I .~y d C ~ ~' Y ~ _~ L ., ^ ~I fgrt31CW 1 s€. .~ i __ r-".Y a ~ l ~ , , !Q :E '~iG ~i - ~ c M ,.r 1411' G ,F a . . 3 a A. - ,e i ~ G ' S ^ r '~ y y i `v y~ 'f 2 LiNU S'P IY d AY _m - ~ d }, ~ 99_ L.mD110 I -S 4a t' 0;' I~ q vA CI IM .~- o ~ y n . i rw. 'ic a~:~YS E'Y ia - A 3 _ " m 1 <. .. n << _' +y+. m< _" 1=x '~; Plum u ,p ~Yri' u. .. ^ +:LYiLE. E K,• srm PO n +w 3~ p . '~ ~~ Five' fs„ ~ ~.:-~ `'c~ 1 R FW l ~ N u Slf=l :~I l u Ig iml~unl r R VI ~ 'j ~ IIP u ..,Jf . ~ 15 .r. - w 'e 6]IXI ' AY {'~ ~ k 1 \ J +I~ ~ q __®_ - Ua ,) II Y y LINE_ L 1 i "/5'b_ IWLXIA ~6 W PIIEY iI M IIIA 011 ,t ~1- ' ..~ ~ PoeIAp I uIWIL ~ M1 +`Itv ~I~mI rt~ ~ ~ 5 ~ 2 Tiff vu ~~W a ~j R ~ ~i /q! ~ I _~ _ ~ ~-~y1I W 9~~ I^1AlIlYPlc ~ ~ F 6LM ' > Y PtlIX t AI _ '~ flpeEfl~ A Y , p AY ~ N i 1 _~ L>1/ _ ~ _ eV..u. ~ ti A _ _ A IlglA. ,V tu[o i- i i • • ~y ' II EMI ~ • • sere-Lee (ere) LIBZB YO 3NIAB1 BBZ 3.LIn5 30N3AY YINNOdflYJ IBIS ANYdX00 1N311d0'13A9B tlAYl _- r.~ ' -.mxava ar ~oi~uas '[ :. -,~ '~ dNWN0I1N7/7/1/]31/S ,. ., 159L{ ON 1OVM13Al1VIN31 I .,>».., 44N 41MLNie ~....¢ ! _ N ~ i 1 ~ p ~ ~ ! ^ f qn P ^ ' a^ a q a ' _ f 31OOVW~~ 6 1 Il N ! yy 5 pg II °*~ a $ p i ~ °. ' i $y~ S // I t p / ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ N! I I 'I ! 11g1 ~ ~ql 1 iltaF~E :yy~~I . [y e - ~[ p F Iy'qag !` 9!e ~ qY'44 E 5p~yef ~ ~I ~ ! ~y 1 e~ .o o ~ ' ~~ 9~i iA7 P8i ~ BSS r 19°. 1 ~ 3¢aI ~ BH G v . - ~ r o y ~ ~ ___________ _____ _______~_______ __ __~ _ • m ~~ • - ~ -- 'a~ ~;~` ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~~ ' ~ ~ 5 . Y . , i • _ 'w i 4h i ~ I tlV ' Ar o / "' p~" ~ ~~ , ~ i" ~ .~ . .'. ~ `~'~ 1` , ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ i 1 _ _ H ~ ~ .4 9 .r ~. c 1 1, •r i IC h ~ I e+- •. ~. r ;11 1.. I alv~ ii-' 3 1 • ~ ' 1~1; ~ 1 - ,S i i 1, 1~~ I I I CO ' ~ S l ' d ~ ~ ~ . it :1 i I ~ { , F . ~ • yy.'1 I ~• - - _ i ~... ~ I I i q~ ~ I _ q ~ ,. ~ i 4 , ~ r_ 1 1 ~ [~ I~ Zz ~~SeY ~ i _ ~ Y I~~I. ~~." " ~ r '• ~-11"~„~l1'? ii ~ IS •- I ~ ~15 -' ~'I i ' ~ae oF~ I ~• ~ ~ '- - - ' ~ - I•I d u o E6 ~ '~b ee - ! V v u `'_ • If •v .S '. [ ~ [ '~ `' A 1 ~ • ~ ' _ i N `a 5 F ~ I 1 i I 4 jF o~ ~YS - I ,~li• Ir 1 ~ ill ( tt {{ nS ~ u s - go_ e` .1 i _ L J. ~ 'YI ~- O a - _- ' ~ - e , 3 y.} I I ~ N ~ Y E Y~ ni ~ '1' 1 ~ , I 1 1i ~ c. ~ 4 1-e ~ • 1 g i ~ .. . y 1 . ~ 1 I Fb~i 1 ~ Ir_ [ ~ , ` ill i 11 I I 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 w S ~ i ~ i ~• a ,. I r .• _ 1 ' ~ I~ ~ -~---- - - I -- - =-- ~--'-'3 --- ~8 II ~ ; n tl 'j II 1 q L L \ I I I i ~ iy \ I ( Yy SC 1 >'~ Y~ \\\ ~ I 2 'y ' ` / y \~ ` '~ ' ~i n ~n N ? ` I ~ O a\ •_ M1 ~ M1 y<~h p a 3 N o ~ o ~ ~ f K p Z ~ ~ O S f F S F S S F 4 3 3 S S FSSS S S F F 3 1 3 # } t " ~ "1e 9p 3 q 3 9 5 d e '4 a tl S 4 e 4 : [ E + i Y q'q ~I a 4 g + gq ¢ [-at ' q d 4 [ : g 5 4 4 a '~I G j tl S tl ~ t i ' ~ y e i A [ 9 [ q [ 4 1 0 ]i <> ' i i 9 : P i i 4 4 y y ~ e F S S } S } 3 F } 1 1 # 3 3 413 F # } 1 # # F F S f 1 # 3 ~ ~ W ~J ~I g m ~ g i 6 l i 3 S 7 1 ! ' > q §' l 6 3 a d 9 i P l i i ? 1 1 A ~ [ : [ + 4 1 i + 4 e - Ca9 - `n 4 [ ~ 9 y + 9 e 9 1 5 BB 9 - e ¢ : [ z [ [ [ [ [ [ i t C-5 swe-<ec leral ueza ra aeual 002 3L(IS 3fIN3AY YINaOdIItlJ ISLS ANYd%Oa J.N3Md0'13A3U YAYl c°"-31 it -c9tlxar9 a9r ia~~uns ^~ ^ ~ . ~^• dVWl~b?713N1V1N3L , , . ..r, IS9!{ dV17YML 3N1V1N31 Nxl~ 1]1CW xLdMYI bYxrtl 9 ~~' ~ ?' Fu ~ ~ ( ^1 al \ , ~ > >a ~e I '. ~, ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ i 1 ' ' , a1 ~ _ , %~~ _ „ ~, r -, ~, ! ` ~ ~~ y `% ti u~S z 3 ! 4~ t _ ~'~° ' o: o z 4 ~z ~~le ~ ~ ~ '_I--y' ~ °l H i ~dzz egg _ }~I , v i Fe ~ ~ .~~ ~~ ~ 1~ F s" } 8 ~W ~ 0 E~2 ;.. _ - s _;z W ` ~ _ , a~>~-~ F .. ' I ~~ _ . ~~~~ ,I~~ V ' . / yl ~ ~ , .1 _- ~~~ ~ I~ ~a ~ _ ~ ~ x ` a n i ~~ I l b ~5~ ~ , , , ~ =, ~ { d qq B ~Si f ~i I - E 5 ¢ ~~E ap hG~~lP' I e: I 7~ g 4e I , yyy~'~Q byyr 9dy(8Y~~Ye@i~ aili!•~M~~~~ ~' P~ ' ( ylTt ~fI wa\\l\\ l l " ' ~ "~ ~F~9§$ep°~~ \ .~.H gl .I ~-_~ _~ ! `I r -r,~JL l ~~ ~ _ ~ l=i~y+ ~5~~ ~ ` C-6 ~- \ 0 s i w rib } ti { '~• i { i 's f f } } } } } g f f i f } } 5 3 3 3 1 1 f 1 1 f } f i a e f , ~ ~ f x i 9~ tl a a a tl a s . x l c : a i i a x x i `: ~ ~ 9 ; 9 1 9 9 i x x r - a i 9 i x i x x x i i x 9 • y i t s } f s s s } f s } f s } s } s s f s f f s s t s s s f f ~ ~ W ~S m a ~ a r r r s l a ; : r ? i } ; } 3 r ; i - 9 3 i ~ 3 2 } ! l 3 r r tl } a ~ } i f r i l ~ 9A x a x i a ; c . a r ea § . x c i r e r i r a a + a x r r r P ~Y'~ 1 _.~ i JyJyry `4 p'! r !~ i 1 111LLL r ~i f{a ~ ~ff# I ry'~ a~i~ _ .P 4 {~i Pxr N }~. f Y {}e ~ s ~ }{!II ~ ~ 5 ~ ;} c 3f(~ i{ ~ ! „~ ~li'0 y ~ ~~~~~! il{ ~(tl ~ i~' ~~ nnx ~~ d~7 ~ ttr j~e 'I~ }if ~~} ~ gda r, ~ g i ;~l 1 i L~ y'~r e ~ IP9 1 • II~'~ scse-ce< IeYeI , LI82B YJ 3NIASI 002 311(IS 811N3AY YINSOlf1Y9 IB19 ANYdNOJ 1N311dO13A30 YAY1 _~ ~~ ~ -waaYO an ~aiwana °e; d ~° rM•'• + dV{Nl~b?I13A/lb'1N31 ,~ •, , l551! ON1~Ytl13N1YJN31 I snxmi uavu RIn3W3 a•..r•o II 1 e ° a 8 v N t~ , ~v9E p Z ~ 1 '^ it 9 i °' 31p0YW~~ 6 n $S$355355}SSSSSSSFSSSSSSSSS it e o }t'Se pe i{ E333q {{ei 9?g5 a Y~ p411 p 4 « §~o2 gii3~2:333, d;d oc.,ia3d~~. y- ~ y •c aiiiil•a: :: aalaaaa iaa ~ y ~ '~p` ~ y 3 a ~p 4 \-4 • C W 2 535S5SS$51$SSSSS$$$543$355535 d45 ~~ '~F-• - yE n ~ 1 n ~3~~id EjpS{!1 9{a: 9i39p4i!!pj?IS ` ~ 1 ~o ~y 3;3.3:,-,a;;;, €3 a: ,33, ; ; 93 ae Ijr '~ C 9 -` 3: __ ! 3 3 i i 3 R R: 3 R F 1 ' ,, ~ 9( ' ~,J]_ _ ? ~ _ 1 r ~ N .'r 5 z let t ~ li ~ ~ y I - ..'LfN. '' I~~ ~ E la -I, ,I = ;y;,l- >. d 'a' _ 9 0., ..~~I ^,IS~ S~ ~ I ~ ~ 3 3 ~ ~ ~ yo e, y~Yr ~ Y . '~ ~ ~.r \ IT' I !~ Ej ~ ~ ~ 'r EjT~ ' - t ~ 9 pp~ F= U~ o FA ~ O 1 r i s ~~ ~~{}.~I.~t~ f n ~F'TTOm ipt^g I' - ._I '' •~ `~ 1 ~ - - 5rl'~a FF~i. "st W9 Ui€ez Ir ~ r r ,r}' 3 _ 1 _ I f ~ }~ - F- p ~ d z ~~ 3 ~~~~ ~~ , r oar , : a ~~Y , . , Z c I ~~ ! O?o I - q~,• i S i I' ~: ~ , ~ ,~ . ~~ ~ pr~ 1 r ~ ..° i I F yy p8 ~- I ~ h ~ ~ _ ~~" ~' ~'1 ,~ s F I~r ^'li t - ~ ~~ ~~" '~ ' ~ O,. r. II'~ , - , ; 9>~t, ~ ~p;: Oy r_ -~ _ !~ , ~B _ ~pjyRppp ~~e g¢ ggg ie a ~ 9 ~~pQapQ ¢pap¢ ¢pp'~° 99 ~64~Y ~ I{_~=-~ _-`~IS~=-?L',,_ _ _ __~=.,~ '' L J-- _--'--_ ~~ _ _ ~ , _ ep YR 8E8~~Y5 g" c , ra rKrrKr irtiimx _ -~ _, .~ y •_ ~I "' : : - _ , .,1 _ `! GX ~l~/T „ 1 scte-cce. lase) e.ieze rJ 'axual osz suns 'arwanr nxaodrlro ~sls ANYdWOJ ixaNdOlaA30 rArl R. '~a1Wrrl~ KLtl(yp M' ILY[ILYIi /1Y /4 lS9Ll ONIJYH13~aLY1M! Gann IAM L]Y)lW WoVq] e~lp ~ i r ' i B ~ e~ ~~ B 4~ i~ ~ 1 9 ~ ~ ' ~IIdlf~ :. ` .-- ~i7y t~ ,`i~ ~ r1E e ~ ~ ~I Ij~1'~ (; ;. ~j `I . dr li _ ~° i~~ ~~ ~~~si~~~r;~aoi , .~ r a- 1- +~- S~9 1, er.r lr... SS ~ w ii m ~ fD 133H5 335 h'Otl YON(l AqJ NJ3 _ ~ ~ ,. a Il 111, 2$0- R:~~ 1 " I W 1 g ~ 15 o `o 00$ 7~ a ~ i ,: CCC~ rl Z< C t~ g a ¢^'I S~ S 4~i'or ~ i 2zo~Se~. U~' dc~iea . ~Ho ~~~, m g{ U Imo. ~~7°g ` UEb°o0 ~ z ~ W 3 ~u F ~~.1 f \) J~, [~ ~}~ j I q >l~ a• ~ ~ ~ I It "~ .~ r S~1a9e~~ ~ r~re~ ~~Y€€S~~~EQ 1 ~1' -- __ 9• ~`' ', `~ ~, ~ _ ~ ~, , ~ ~ N ~ r ~ V' ~l /f ~ L ` + 1 (1 l ' I N ... ` i ~ r 'w I 7 \ 1! j 1 L p • e ~{ , U ~ ~ ~_~ ~ = =-== ~ m il C 1 ~1~ ` 1, ~ t`/ I// '' ~J i, r \_J 5 9 scse-Llt lore) -aoxau an u.riun+ NV7d ~ ° ~ ~ e(sze rJ 9uual „~s°~.. y ~ t ~- osz 9.uns anw9AV neaodnra {ms JNIOq?1J N/lld3~N0~ ANYdP(IJ 1N311d0'19A9U YAYL !yg[{ py1:1YM13N1Y1N31 ! 1 (~ o ,. suaem e+.ti ~tl 1 i . s»enu r.u 1 uaw -~.'-3~ !!HH • ~ L p es < ~ N p $ •1 p~ ~ 1 ° y p ° p~ ~ 9 E ; ~ 3 3 gyp{ W t t 1 ~ ~ •~ ~ q pp ~ ~ + r 1 t ~ ~ ip t5 F ~ 1 ~' ' ~ t • ~ W ~ ~, t '~-H' J /tC` ~!' ; 1 ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~! -- ~ 1 ~ a (r ! ~ 1 i L R y .[ - 1 ti, ~ ~ `. ~'i'i~ ~ . ° ~ ~` L r' ^' ~ ~.u - 9/.'*l'i~ i r'y,`T~~~{.. ~$,~ fc ~'~ipiO~~$$ias$$ { i. i ~ . 1 5 I ~ ~ I r ' ~ 1 /~ ~ r ~,,,R .I II ` ° } ~` \,p r ~ ~ ~ I ~~sY I I\ ~ v ,~' ~' \`;}{~I p ~ ~F 1` ~ ~ ` 5 \ ce ~ ~ ~. id IY \ .+- z '.-` r p!. 'i -, N~~ -~ I . t, 1h~ { ~ !,'> '~y~ 1 ~ ~ 1 2-'+ci+V 1 8 ~ ~3 .. \~,\.. ~I '$','~c, i ``` r ~z om :1 ~Y n.N ~' ~ \, `11"I'Z ;~ :, ;~ ; . -1 .') 13 \, ~ Ir ~ - ~ i ~'i' r' ~ . DE.°~$pr; ~ Ir. .t};~. I` 1 ,- .'a~°-,~ „' ~ A rte, ~ °~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ r; ~ if' Il , ~~ ' ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ S 1 m ~ ~ a W ~ ~ a i4 ~ ~ =~ k=~ ~~ ~d', ~ I +L ~ 1. r ~. ~' F @ ~ \ i = ~I ,~ ` n _ l 9$ 1 . '~~ , . ~U d b ° 0 ~rtr -110, I, 4' I , ' _ • W ~ ~ a-~ %,I .#%i$~{~i ~t' I ~, ~`~ / \ I'(ll' ;~~_ C•\~}'~_ gyp! 1 \1 ~ ~ A ~ ~ / ,~+ ` . "l ~I t ~ $~ c i ~ 1~ l"/2 °' 1~ F" v ~I I i ~ u' 1' G I ~ ~ i'~ ~ p I Z `={~l I+~`~J4, I E. f' L {~~, I\ ~ f,. ,..\~(~~ J1 I 1 ~ il>$ \ i ~~m r S/ 1 1 1{ ~~ ~ 1 1 '1 . ~~ J ` t° I I p a . I y~ ~ `I.1 ' w ~ ~ \c ~. . O~ •F I l t' '`'1;5- ~ ~ v . I ~ ~ , ; ' , ~ ~; L ; x •, ,, , l> ~„+ ; l ';~' I ' `-) ~ I ~ ~ / ~ B ' I r' '"~ e $t ~i r G v n . p Q + ~~ :c '., ,.`i~Si' ~ , , it 1' ~ f ~y , ,~~X ~ 3~i I ' b; : •S t ~A~ ~'1 1 ' ~I I ';~ ~ 4~- -- ~-, .' _ , ire ~~_ ~$ ~7 d ~~;'1K1~~;_ ' ~ ` e i ~. I~p'!1 tp ~tp (!~ '..° ° °~ pi . 1 rm +LV.ru~ {~ I r : t$ r - i i G j i ' o ~_ ~ e 8g S~ "m .rc ~';? i_5' ~~^^~~``__ 1\. ~' 1~1~._ 1•/)}'r" % -.-(~l.` ~ ~p re $ g ¢ . . p ~d4~Sil~p &6eg5~ \+~Y .I :l I. ~ 1 1'n I ~;_ li;~ j5~~-; qs t9~,. /i%~.._ „i.V ~ =..+~m~="-~S \ \ ~ ~.r qq qyyq }£yp'$qq$9a5c '~ tl e 11~\\ a; I 1 _ 1 1® _- ~l u5 ji_ ~j ~~ s j~~ ;-". '~~. ,P I~ 1'-'~ I ~ ~ 77 f" e ~~ e {+ `1r~4 1~ I ~ = - \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ` g J ,t,,. ., _ r^; _=i _ -. ~ r tl. ~ e EetP y~ y I cIZ,( ( j,. • y ~$BSi9~eF~F~S$1 •~~! r'I:'~''~*\u~'IV . I ,fit . ~t ~ G9 ~ , , r An 1 X71 1 \/ scse-us (eye) Li Bte YJ 'aNUal ooa a.uns 'anNanY nNaodrn~ ~s~s ,WYdMOJ ,W3Pde'IaAaU YAYi ~- ~~~ vvrm~ rvu 5 x ;n C 1. '~i ~ +~ 1 g ! ~l~x Sq' F~ t'~lEp Ig ~, 5g;olyygg~~~ !o _% vrrl gee xre ~'~ (' T l N 4 N N O ~ •_ R:~~ ~~ ~ t ~ ~ j Wo C. r r ~ ~ ~ ~ `o g 0 ~ ~ p` pg q : ~-' ~rE! IS •S ~r~ ' ~ tt }I ig~ F / I ~ ~'~, ff '. ~ , ~ ~n i ~ g a 2-<<~s 111 i i i"9 e! Z 'Z ~ ~ SF ~ ~ `~ i ~F o~~re ) ~ e~~~ ; U' d ~ o n ' i li ~~ of ~ ~E" m;~ Ir, 1 p p Ww~ ~4 ~~`''Li~ v F s ~ +~-~"~; 1 9a ¢g W ~ f" ~ i , 1 i' 1)lsi I ~ . `i 4 l~') ~ ht \ ~~1i `~ a = ~~ ~~~ 6~~~~~~} ~~~e'~ ~~~~~ ~= B~ `~~§49~v~oeyGy~gdg~agg . ~8~g~gg~g~giAi~. ~$€gF ~e E S$P !9 133H5 3 -amcva a. i..uwn. lSTLI ON1~YN13NLY/N]I uraY1 L-1 U eoe I NV7d t ONlOb2IJ 76'~1d30N00 ! ~ y s"e 1 ~{ / ~ ~ a.ns 9^ 1 « -1 i s ~ l,` t..~{,..~i1 1.-, i, X C~VC i C_ ,~ I / r~ 11 l ~ «i /,i , H i ` ~ `~ / ~ )~ J ~` ` 1 !`~ r, ~ ~~~ -~ ~`~ ~ ri ~ a ~- ~3~, il~ ~ 1 i , ~~ i/'~i,, ~ I k;~ @ x E ~85 .o uII S ~.~ - x ~ v g g' ~ p i 'C le ! .I x ~ w i FW N ~ Ce ' x~ \ ~ ti~ ~ r ~ a i !r _ __ T'_ ~ § w Y _ ~x ~ o S s- - S p x u E ~ ~ _ W eI S ~x x- = ! z ~~ \~ e ~U ~~ ENVIRONMENTAL - INFORMATION FORM (Part~l -Initial Study) CMy orRancho Cucamonga (Please~type or pnnt clearly using ink Use ffie tab key to move Irom one Ilne fo fhe next~llne.) Plannug Drvisron ~ , (909)477-2750' ~ The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the~basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California 'Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full ~ ' Application Numberforthe pmlect to which this form pertains SUBTTM17651 Pm/ect Title TAVA DEVELOPMENT CO TTM17651 Hsiao Chen Chw and Shueh-Hui Wu Chiu, and Hsiao Yen Chw and Huang Name 6 Address of pmlect owner(s) Yu- Chih Chiu 4228 Miraleste Dnve, Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 TAVA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, 5161 Caldomia Avenue, SuRe Name 8 Address of developer or pm/ect sponsor 200, Irvine, CA 92617 Contact Person & Addn:ss Stewart C McPherson, 14222 Wistena Lane, Tustin, CA 92780 Name & Address of person preparing this form (~f ddfen:nt from above) Same Telephone Number Office 714-731-1911, Mobile 949-293-2455 06-28-06ranchoenvironformmRialsry doc ~+-1 1 C2ated on 522/2002 4 09 PM INCOMPLETEAPPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note thatnrs the responsonny ormeappncum eu enwmn~ui the eppllcahon rs complete at the hme of submittal, Crty stall will not be available to peAorm work required to pmwde missmg In/ormahon ' '1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the prged site, and indicate the site boundaries 2) Prowde a set of rrolor photographs that show 2p2sentahve views into the site from the north, south, east and west, views into end hom the site from the primary access points that serve the site, and represeritahve views of significant features firm the site Include a map showing location of each photograph 3) Prgect Location (describe) gdlacent to and southerly bf Banyan Street approximateN one fourth mile east of East Avenue W) Assessors Parcel Numbers (attach addrtonal sheet if necessary) 225-191-012 •5) Gross Site Area (ac/sq R) 41 00 `5) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed 32 70 dedications) ~ 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the pro/act site (attach additional sheet if necessary) ' None , 8) Include a description of all permds which will be necessary from the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to (ally implement the pro/act , (1) Tree Removal Permit (2) Rough Grading Permit, (3) Precise Grading Permit (4) Wall Permit, and 5 Buddin Permit 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as d exists before the pro/act including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures Attach photographs of significant features described In addition, cite all sources of information (i a ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and arohedogical surveys, haffic studies) Site is predominantly covered wrath chaparral vegetation 8 mature EucaNPtus tree along west property bounds Elevation a ears relativel flat but vanes from 1,480 ft in northwest comer to1430 ft in south- east comer There are no trails roads drainage courses scenic aspects or structures on the Property Sods/geotechnical research and onsite sub-surface investigation performed by Applicants geologist Petra r;,.,..e..1...,r~i ~,,,r r,~~ rierermmed Sde is sudable for proposed development. Site does not he within an 06-28-05ranchcenwronforminR~alsy doc (~,-12 Created on 5222002 4 09 PM Information indicated by an asterisk (J is not required of nonoonstruchon CUP's unless otherwise requested by staN. Earthquake Fault Zone Depth of groundwater beneath Site is 600+ ft Sods consist of unconsolidated deposits of course-grained sand to bouldry allumwum A comprehenswe biological invesUgafan has been performed for Applicant by The Chambers Group includng onsite focused surveys for endangered plants u 8 animals updated June 2006 No coastal California gnatcatchers nor SB Kangaroo rats were found dunnq surveys/trapping and no special status plant species were observed dunnq focused surveys Plummer's Mariposa Idy a California natwe plant Soaety List 1 B speces was observed In add~hon, 2 6 acres of Rroersidian AFSS was observed Proposed offsie mitigation recommehded for both Protect Reports/Studies performed- (1)Chambers Biological Investigation updated O6/06;.Petre Geotechnical soils/geotechnigl Investigation and Percolation Test dated 06/09/06, (3) Petra Envtron ., Phase I dated02/07/05 (4) DKS Traffic Consultants Noise Impact Anarysis dated 1129/05 (5) Borer Arbonst Report dated 12/09/05 (6) Madole Assoaates Preliminary Drainage Studv 11/10/05 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the sde Cde all sources of mformahon (books, published reports and oral history) No known cultural and/or historical aspects of the Sde ' 11) Descnbe any noise sources and then levels that now affect the sde (arn:reft, roadway nose, etc) and how they wilt affect proposed uses Roadway noise along Banyan Street & East Avenue DKS Noise Impact Analysis indicates the neither roadways curcently exceeds Citys Standards Long Term (2020) wrth Protect Cond~bons indicate onty ' East Avenue south of Banyan expected to exceed Cdy's standards 12) Descnbe the proposed pro/ect m detail Thrs should prowde an adequate descnptron of the site m temps o/ultimate use that will result from the proposed pro/ect Indicate d there am proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur wdh each phase, and the ant~apated complehon of each increment Attach addrtonel sheet(s) dnecessary The proposed development is being processed under the VL Zone in accord Meth the Etrwanda Speafic Plan design guidelines Proposed development vnll be comprised of 56 SFD lots having a minimum lot area of 20 000 sq ft and an overall average lot area of 25 053 sq ft The Sde is covered by an Equestrian Overlay and includes in the design/TTM prwate feeder trails serving the rear of the lots wdh rear Yard • equestrian access and three linkages to the Community Trail System designed along Banyan St "F' Street, and "F" Street The Proposed development Moll fronton Banyan Street which runs along the north boundary of the Sde and will include two points of access those being "E" and "A" Streets A 06-28-O6ranchoenwronfonnini6alsty doc C-13 Created on 5222002 4 09 PM Ir`` I IrYi I development phasmg plan and development Ume schedule has not yet been determined Anticipated start in 2007 13) Descnbe the surmundmg properties, including rnformahon on plants and animals and any cultural, histoncal, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc), intensity offend use (qne-family, apartment houses, shops, deparhgent stores, etc) and scale of develoQmenf (height frontage, setback, rear yard, BtC ). I Properties to the immediate north east and south of the Site are all unimproved raw land Etrvvanda School Distnct owns 10 acres of land immediatery north of the Site Frye pnvate ownerships Ite on the west boundary of the Site varying in size from approximately 2 to 5 acre parcels each with one residence I er ro e 1 14) Will the proposed pmfect change the pattern, scale orchart+cterol the surrounding general area of the pro/ed~ The proposed development will convert 41+/- acres of vacant land into 56 half acre equestnan onented lots mlcudmg prnate feeder and Community Trails which will change the immediatery surrounding landscape, but prowde a dev elopment which is consistent with the nearby existing and new developments to the west and northwest of the Sde 15) Indicate the type o/short-temr and long-term Horse to be generated, rrlcludmg source and amount How will these Horse levels affect adfacent properties and onsde uses What methods of soundproofing are pmposed7 Short term noise anticipated from construcUOn actlwtles pnmanly related to grading and construction of _ underground uttlitles/storm dram faci6Ues and considered temporary Max short term noise level 'to reach 75dba at southeast corner of Summit Intermeidate School temporanly. Long term noise offsite v~nll be from roadway noise on Banyan SL and East Avenue Protect impact level not antlcipated to exceed City's Standards Mitlgatlon recommendations include Eft wall along Banyan, and standard sound attenuations ecificetlons to be built into house construction =16) Indicate proposed removals aridrorreplacerrients of mature orscenic trees Borer Arborist Report indicates 76 existing miscellaneous ornamental trees tieing along westerly property boundary to be removed No oak specimens are contained within the Vee inventory Replacement to be 1 1 with 15 gallon minimum sized trees planted in condormance with Etiwanda SP guidelines 17) Indicate any bodies of water (vicluding domestic water supplies) into which the site drams The Site iS located in Area 5 of the Etiwanda San/Sevaine Area Dreinage Policy tabled to utilized existing master Plan System 5 drainage faaliUes and the Victona Basin Secondary Facititv via offsite drainage . improvements to be constructed from the proposed development south to the existing POC on north side of the 210 Fwy between East Avenue and the new Etiwanda Channel O6-29-0aranchcenvironforminrtlalsty doc ~ C-14 Created on 5/22Y2002 4 09 PM 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A forusage eshmates) For fuMrerderrficehan, please • contact the Cucamonga County WaterOrstnct at 987-2591 t ' e Resnienhel (gel/day) 705 00 Peak use (gel/Day) p CommercraUlnd (gaUday/ac) Peak use (gaUrmn/ac) 5 J9) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal ®Sephc~ Tank ^ Sewer., If sephc tanks en: proposed, attach percolation tests elf discharge to a serntary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generahon (See Attachment A for usage eshm~tes) For further danficafron, please cooled the Cucamonga County Water Orsfict et 987-2591 y a Resrdenhal (gal/day) b CommemraUlndustnal (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of resrdenha/amts 56 I~tached (mdreate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot,srze and maximum lot sire Minimum lot s¢e is 20 000 sq ft maximum lot s¢e is 47 038 sq ft average overall lot s¢e rs 25 053 sq ft. Attached (mdreate whetherunds ere rental or for sale units) 21) Anhcrpated range of sale pnces and/or rents Sak: Pnce(s) $0 00 to $0 00 C~ Rent (per month) $ ro $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type Architecture has not yet been prepared pending ~' approval of development entitlements 231 Indicate anhcipated household size by and type Anticipated sizmg to be 3,500 sq ft single story floor plan and two or more two story floor plans uwth s¢es up to 4 500+/- sq ft C-15 t 06-28-O6ranchoenvironfonnini6alsty doc Page 5 of 9 Created on 522/2002 409 PM ~, I 24) fndroate the expected numbero/school children who wdl be residing wdhrn the~pm/ect Contact the appropnate School Distncts as shown rn Attachment 8 i ~ i ~~'/ ~ a Elementary .! a ~7~ i b JunrorMgh .2-~ ~- ~ c SemorHrgh ' 262z~e~Q' COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type of use(s) and mafor h/nchon(s) of commem~al, mdustnal or rnshtuhonal uses ' , .~ 26) Total flow area o/ commeraal, mdustnal, or mshtuhona/ uses 4Y type ~~i 27) Indicate hours of operehor{, I~ 28) Numberolemployees Total Maximum Shrfl Time of Maximum ShAI 29) Pmwde breakdown o/anhcrpated fob classrficahons, rnGudmg wage and salary ranges, as well as an rnd~cahon of the rate of hire for each classrficahon (attach add~honal sheet d necessary) 30) Eshmahon o/the number of workers to be hued that currently reside rn the Cfi' '31) Forcrommercral and mdustnal uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of err pofluhon emissions (Data should be venfied through the South Coast Air Quality Management Drstnct, at (818) 572-6283) 0628-06renchoenv~mnformmmalsty doc C-16 Page 6 of 9 Cn:afed on 5222002 4 09 PM • ~~ • ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and /food control agencies ~servmg the pro/act been contach~rl to deterrhme them, abflrty to • provide adequate service to the proposed pmlecty I/so, please indicate therrresponse Water/Sewer-Cucamonga Valley Water has been contacted and has indicated its ability to provxle ' i water and sewer service RC Fve has been contacted An alternative Fuel Modification Plan agreement has been reached with Fire No flood control service regwred, The proposed development will connect to City storm dram system 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous And/or toxlp matenals? Examples o(hazardous and/or toxic matenals include, but are not l~mrted to PCB's, rad~oadrve substances; pesticides and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable ligyids and gases Also note underground storage of any'of the above Please list the matenals and descnbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, es well es the dates of use, if known ' A Phase I environemental assessment was performed by Petra Enwronmenfal for the Site dated 2/09/05 Assessment indicates'no evidence past or present via record search arfd onsite inspection of the existence of any hazardous and/or toxic matenals within the sde' 34) liYll the proposed pm/act involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazaniau and/or toxic . matenals, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide en inventory of all such matenals to be used and proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans ~ , NO I hereby certify that the statements famished above end m the attached exhibits present the date and mfomiation raquued for adequate evaluahon of this pro/act to the best o/my ability, that the fads, statements, and information presented are hue and correct tot he best o/my knowledge and belie( I furtherunderstand that edd~honal information maybe roquned to be submitted before en adequate evaluahon can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ ~ , Date 6/28/06 Signature Tdle Representative of TAVA Development C • C-17 06-28-O6ranehcenvironfonniniGalsty doc Pege 7 of 9 Created on 5222002 4 09 PM ATTACHMENT A . Water Usaae Average use per day Residential ' Single Family ApUCondo CommerciaUlndustrial General and Regional CommerGal Neighborhood Commeraal General Industnal Industnal Park Peak Usage For all uses Average use x 2 0 600, gaUday ' 400,gaUday ' 3,000 gal/day/ac 1,500 gaUday/ac x,500 gaUday/ac 3,000 gal/daylac Sewer Flows ' Residential ' Single Family , ApUCondos Commercia UI ndustrial General Commeraal Neighborhood CommerGal General Industnal Heavy Industnal Source Cucamonga County Water Distnct Master Plan, 6/00 C-18 06-28-06ranehcenvironfortnmiUalsty doc Page 6 of 9 270 gal/day 200 gaUday 2,000 gal/daylac 1,000 gaUday/ac 1,500 gal/day/ac 3,000 gal/day/ac • 1 .~ C~ Created on 522/2002 409 PM ' ATTACHMENT B Contact the school distnct for your area for amount and payment of school fees Elementary School Districts „ Alta Loma , 9350 Base Line Road, Swte F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 , (909) 987-0766 " Central 10601 Church Street, Swte 112 , Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)989-8541 ~~ Cucamonga ~~ 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 , (909)987-8942 E6wanda 5959 East Avenue P O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 .High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontano, CA 91762 (909)988-8511 ., •, ' ~~ • C-19 0628-06raneAcennronforminrtialsrydoe Page 9 of 9 ceated on 5/ZZ/211a2 a ~ P1A I ~ I~I ~ 1 i~~ I ~ i HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE STATEMENT I ~~ I~ I have been informed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga of my responsibilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 65962 5 (copy attached) to notify the City ., as to whether the site for which a development application has been submitted is located ~ ' within an area which has been designated as the~location of a hazardous waste site by the , Office of Planning and Research, State of Califomia;(OPR)~ , I have also been informed by the Cary of Rancho Cucamonga that, as of,the date of executing this Statement, OPR has not yet cdmpiled and distrubted a lift of hazardous waste sites as required by said Section 65962.5x' r~ I am informed and believe that the proposed site for which a development application has been submitted is not within any area specified in said Section 65962.5 as a hazardous waste site. I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of California that the • foregoing is true and correct Dated: V~ G ~`-' ~~~,~ ,~ ~^'~"° ~ • C-20 • ' City of Rancho Cucalrionga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND , 1. Prolect File: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17651 2. Related Files: DRC2006-00174 Tree Removel Permit ~ '' 3. ,Description of Project• TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17651 -TAVA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - A request to subdivide 41 32 gross acres of land into 56 parcels in the Very Low Residential District, located approximately 1,200 feet, east of East Avenue and south of Banyan Street - 022'5-191-12 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: TAVA Development Company ~ , Attn. Mr Tony Allen 19600 Fairchdd,Road, Swte 270 ~ ' Irvine, CA 92612 ' 5. General Plan Designation: Very Low Residential 6. Zoning: Very Low Residential 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: To the north,,south, east, and west are vacant parcels To the northwest is Summit Intermediate School l;. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number Lou LeBlanc, Assistant Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agenaes whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVW D -Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District SW PPP -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G ', , C-21 I~` Initial Study for ~~ ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT17651 , ~ Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one Impact that is a °Potentially Significant Impact,° "Potentially S~gmficarit Impact Unless Nhtiggtion Incorporated,° or °Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by th'p checklist on the following pages. (/) Aesthetics ~ O Agricultural Resources (/) Alr Qualdy (/) Biological Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Geology & Sods ()Hazards & Waste Materials (/) Hydrology & Water Quality ' ()Land Use & Planning ()Mineral Resources (/) Noise' ()Population &'Housmg ()Public Services ()Recreation () Transportationlfrattic () Utilities & Service Systems ()Mandatory Frndmgs of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation. (X) I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the protect have been made by, or agreed to, b the protect proponent A MI GATED NEGATIVE DECLAR TION dl be prepared. Prepared By. Date ~r~/ ~/~ Reviewed By ~w ~ ~--~~ate~ `t' r `~~ C-22 • u • Rev 4/20/05 Initial Study for SUBTT17651 ~~ City of~Rancho Cucamonga ~ Page 3 , ~ Less men 1 ' Sipmfirant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Pae~>v~, SipruLCant w,tn MNpaho,l me" S,gnficent iNo 1 n Inca ted I I EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the pro/ect ~ , a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas O O O (~ b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () ,, (/) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State'Scenic Highways ' c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (/) ( ) which, would adversely affect day or nighttime views ins the area Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adtacent to the protect site The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 No impact anticipated b) The protect site is part of a larger area designated as a "Mator Community Design Feature" because of "special vegetation/windrows" according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 This vegetation, which includes Eucalyptus windrows planted to protect groves, provides "a historic link to our agricultural past " The Etiwanda Specific Plan (ESP) is the primary tool for implementing this policy The ESP Figure 5-13 does not identify any of the windrows on protect site for preservation The ESP calls far the perpetuation of the windrow system by the gradual replacement and expansion of windrows at a rate of 50 linear feet per acre of new on-site windrows, therefore, a total of 2,050 linear feet of new windrows are required on this 41-acre site An arborist report was prepared (Jim Borer, Certified Arborist No 496) which identified 74 trees on-site that qualify as °heritage trees" as defined by the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance Of these, 69 are Eucalyptus 'blue gum' or 'red gum,' 4 are California Sycamore and 1 Elderberry The arborists concluded that alt of the trees, except one California Sycamore (Tag No 3), have "some form of either structural decline or physical characteristic that makes their long-term viability marginal " Further, these trees were damaged in the October 2003 Grand Prix Fire The arborist noted that the California Sycamore (Tag No 3) could be relocated, however, with only "a 50 percent chance of survival " The protect site contains no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) New Eucalyptus windrows shall be planted a minimum of 2,050 linear feet in 5-gallon size as required by the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 2) The existing Eucalyptus windrows and other trees shall be removed and replaced with 5-gallon Eucalyptus Maculate 'spotted gum,' spaced 8 feet on center. c) The property is surrounded to the north, south, east, and west by vacant land The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this protect Design review is required prior to approval City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and Rev 4/20/05 C-23 Initial Study for SUBTT17651 City of Rancho Cucamonga i Page 4 ~ Less Then i $ipnfiCant Leae Issues and Supporting Information Sources PWanUally $,grvieam WM A4UpaUM Then Sgeecerit , No el Into tea I I utility enclosures m accordance With Planning Commission Resolution No; 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The protect would increase the number of streetlights and s~cunty lighting used m the immediate vicinity The design and placement of the light fixtures will be shown on Site Plans which require review for consistency with City'standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect fighting' to avoid glare The lighting wdl be selecteii and located to confine the area of illumination to within the protect site The impact is not considered significant 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the protect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Untque Farmland, ors () () (~) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared ,pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural Uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agn~ultural use, or a O O O, ' (~) Williamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (~) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments. a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is surrounded to the north, south, easy, and west by vacant land There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The motor concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our Cfty that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, tonging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Pian Land Use Plan The General Pian Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) The site is surrounded to the north, south, east, and west by vacant land. The nearest agricultural use is more than 1/4 mile south from the protect site Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated C-24 ~, Rev 4/20/05 Initial Study for SUBTT1.7651 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 ~~ ~~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources volem~a~ly $ionircan, wro, Mibpaoon m.~ 9a~IloM r+o I act Into e0 1 3. AIR OUALfTY. Would the pro/ect ~~ ' " a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of "the () () () (/) applicable air quality plans ~~ b) Violate any air quallty standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to an existing or protected air quality violation ,~ c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net mcrease of O O O (y) any criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations ~) Create obtectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () , (/) number of people Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development sRe until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a protect- specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected Rev 4/20/05 C-25 Initial Study for SUBTT17651 Issues and Supporting Information Sources City of Rancho Cucamonga y Page 6 Less Then I it Sigrnficanl Lass WM Than ~ MiLganon, 9gnificant No equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment 4vill be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be Infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform ~ to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air duality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or 0xceed performance standards rtioted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 1 5) All construction egwpment shall comply wi~h SCAQMD Rules,402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shell include the following provisions: •, Reestablish ground cover on the cbnstruction site through seeding and waterlog Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the Clty If silt is carved over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWaC6]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM~g) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 , 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~g emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered egwpment where feasible. C-26 '~, ,~ ~, r_1 LJ Rev 4/20/05 Initial Study for SUBTT17651 City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Page 7 ~ man 1 ' sip~uficant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potan4ally Spnificant wnn A4opauon 7na~ Siprvficant No 1 act Into rated I I 9) The construction contractor shall ,ensure that Construction-Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After Implementation of the preceding mifigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) mgdel estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nitrogen Oxides (Nox), Reactive Organib Gases (ROG), and Fine Particulate Matter (PM~p) would exceed SCAOMD thresholdg for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions beset( upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant If they cannot ,be mitigated on a protect basis toy a level less-than-significant The following ' mitigation measures shall be implemented ' 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water . heaters. 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAOMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAOMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAOMD Rule 1401 According to the SCAOMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAOMD Rule . 1401 The protect site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor two public schools and single-family residences Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading C-27 Rev 4/20/05 Initial Study for SUBTT17651 City of Rancho Cucamonga i Page 8 ' Lass Then i Siprefieenl Lev Issues and Supporting Information Sources r°'~a~rY Sign,ficant ~" Munpatlm Than S,pefi°ent ' No C Irco led 1 I the site The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated , 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the prolect. a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () (/) () ( ) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or,special status species in 'local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Services b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () (/) () ( ) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations 'or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Services c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ' () () () (/) the protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, , filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Intertere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with 'any local policies or ordinances () (/) () ( ) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments• a, b, f) The prolect site is surrounded to the north, south, east and west by vacant land According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development may adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals. The prolect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Pian, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 A biological survey was prepared (Chambers Group, June 2006) of the 41 2 acre prolect site The study concluded that the site contains fragments of high-quality Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS) totaling 2 6 acres located through out the west half of the site, a northwest portion of the site containing 7 9 acres of Southern Mixed Chaparral/RAFSS, and 30 8 acres of Southern Mixed Chaparral/White Sage Series The survey also found Plummer's mariposa lily plants • • Rev 4/20/05 C 28 C J Initial Study for SUBTT1,7651 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Less roan ' S,pNficent Lsaa Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potan"ally Significant wan MNgaUtn rn.n Sgnfit~t No ~I Inco led I I present on the site Plummet's mariposa Illy species is not regulated by the FedQral of Caltfornta Endangered Species Acts, however, is considered rare by the Calrfomta Native Plant Society There is no riparian habitat present on-site The protect site Iles within designated critical habitat for the Calrfomia Coastal Gnatcatcher (CCG) and San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR) Because of the presence of suitable habitat on-site an'd the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) records to the vicinity, this species has a moderate potential to occur on-site Therefore, focused surveys for coastal California gnatcatcher were necessary The Coastal Caltfdrnta gnatcatcher was not observed during any of the six focused surveys conducted during the breeding season Therefore, this species can be considered absent from the protect site at this time • • In addition, a live-trapping survey (SJM Biological Consultants, August 2005) was conducted for the federally endangered San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat and the Calrfornta Species of Special Concern Los Angeles Pocket Mouse (LAPM) The study found that the "habitat conditions on the property appeared to be generally highly suitable for both SBKR and LAPM", however, none were captured or observed It should t>e noted that the protect site was completely burned over to October 2003, during the Grand Prix Fire The trapping survey concluded "that neither SBKR nor LAPM will be impacted by the proposed development protect at the current time " The following mitigation measures are recommended to reduce the level of potential impact 1) If the site is developed more than 2 years after the date of the original biological surveys, new focused surveys for the California Gnatcatcher, San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat and the Los Angeles Pocket Mouse (LAPM) shall be pertormed prior to issuance of any clearing and grubbing, Grading or Building Permits. 2) The developer shall purchase and preserve off site lands to provide substitute '~ resources at a ratio of 1:1 equaling 2.6 acres. 3)'' The developer shall collect seeds of the Plummer's mariposa Illy and/or transplant bulbs under the direction of a qualified restoration ecologist. 4) Construction limits shall be fenced with temporary chain link fencing prior to any site clearing and grubbing or any other disturbance and prior to Issuance of any grading or building permits to protect preserved areas. 5) The developer shall hire a biologist to monitor vegetation clearing and Initial grading to minimize potential effects to common wildlife species and California Special Concern Species. 6) In the event that vegetation clearing or tree removal is necessary during the bird breeding season (February 15 through August 31), the developer shall hire a qualified biologist to conduct a preconstruction survey to identify the locations of nests within the areas affected by clearing. If the biologist finds an active nest within or adjacent to these areas, then the biologist shall delineate an appropriate buffer zone around the nest, marked by flagging or fencing, and construction or clearing shall not be conducted within this buffer zone until the biologist determines that the nest is no longer active. Rev 4/20/05 C-29 I,1 I I,y~ I 1 1 ' , Initial Study for SUBTT17651 City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 10 ~ Less man I , Slgnlhcenl lass I Issues and Supporting Information Sources Valanllally SlpnlhcaM wlln Mlligahon rnan $Ignificanl INo I act Into algid I act I C • 7) Prior to completion of the project construction activities each day, the developer shall remove all trash and debrPs to avoid attracting wildlife. ' c) No wetland habitat is present on-site As;a resNlt, protect implementation would have no impact on these resources ' d) The surrounding area is vacant land, however, flood control facilities to the north and east, ; and the I-210 Freeway to the south, have cut-off wildlife access and any wildlife corridors No adverse impacts are anticipated ' e) The protect site is part of a larger area designated as a "Mator Community Design Feature" because of "special vegetation/windrows" according to General Plan Exhibit 111- 15 This vegetation which includes Eucalyptus windrows planted to protect groves provides "an historic link to our agricultural past" The ~tiwanda Specific Pian (ESP) is the ' primary tool for implementing this pplicy The ESP Figure 5-13 does not identify any of the windrows on protect site for prdservation The ESP calls for the perpetuation of the windrovy system by the gradual replacemer)t and expansion of windrows at a rate of 50 linear feet per acre of new on-site windrows, therefore, a total of 2,050 linear feet of new windrows are required on this 41-acne site An arborist report was prepared (Jim Borer, Certified Arborist No 496) which identified 74 trees on-site that qualify as "heritage trees" as defined by the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance Of these, 69 are Eucalyptus 'blue gum' or 'red gum,' four are California Sycamore end one Elderberry The arborists concluded that all of the trees, except one California Sycamore (Tag No 3), have "some • form of either structural decline-or physical characteristic that makes their long-term , viability marginal," further, these trees were damaged in the October 2003 Grand Prix Fire The arborist noted that the California Sycamore (Tag No 3) could be relocated, however, with only "a 50 percent chance of survival " Therefgre, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels g) New Eucalyptus windrows shall be planted a minimum of 2,050 linear feet in 5-gallon size as required by the Etiwanda Specific Plan. g) Existing Eucalyptus windrows and other trees shall be removed and replaced with 5-gallon Eucalyptus Maculate 'spotted gum', spaced 8 feet on center. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (~) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (~) outside of formal cemeteries C-30 • Rev 4/20/05 Initial Study for SUBTT17651 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 Less Than i Sipnificanl Lau Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g I'otenaelly Significant Wlih MiLpeapn Tnn $IpniM1tril no I act Into etl I Comments , a) The protect site has not been identified as a "H~storic Resource° per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact ' b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 511). Construction aCtMty, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: . • • Enact interim measures td protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish Its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources wlthjn the protect area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 511) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The protect site is underlain by quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or Rev 4/20/05 C-31 I`` I 1,~' II I Initial Study for SUBTT17651 City of Rancho Cucamonga i~ Page 12 i Less Than I I Significant Less 1 Issues and Su ortin In ormation Sources PP g f Polamianv Sipndicant wan Mrtipanon Tnan spmncent , No act Inco tetl I eh I ct preserve them for study The palegntologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recorhmendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, tithe program must Incldde, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. ' • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer',to a`In appropriate depository (i.e., San ' Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed prolect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development No known religious or sacred sites exist within the prolect area No evidence is in place to suggest the prolect site has been used for hurrah burials The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050 5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 98.'. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site No adverse impacts are anticipated 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the prolect: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Paolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shakings O O O (/) ni) Seismic-related ground failure, including O O U (/) hquefacUOM iv) Landshdes~ O O O (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () (/) () ( ) C-32 • .'. r~ LJ Rev 4/20/05 ~1 L_J Initial Study for SUBTT17651 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 i Lass man ' $,9mlicara Lau ~ Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Po~~,e~~Y S~gruncant wnn Mmpaem man 99ruf~~an~ Ho I a Into tad 1 I c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () . () (~) or that would become unstable as a result of, the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidencA, liquefaction , or collapse d) Be located on expansive sod, as defined m,Table O O O (~) 18-1-B of the Unrform Budding Code (1994), creating substantial asks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () ()' (~) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewaters , Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site, and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is tt m the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone 91ong the Red Hill Fault, according to the ' General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 51 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hill Fault, passes within 75 mile northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 1 7 mile north These faults are both capable of producing M„, 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jaanto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7 5 earthquakes ~s 4 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to M„, 8 2 earthquakes, is 6 miles northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhering to the Unrform Bwidrng Code will 'ensure that geologic impacts are less-th an-significant The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-sde soils The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting ,~n temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts m the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. • 4) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all mactrve construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. Rev 4/20/05 C-33 Initial Study for SUBTT17651 City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 14 i ~ Lass Than ~ $,gnlnCanl less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Falannally $IgN(Canl w,m Miagaaan Than 5gnficam No I n Inp1 ted I I c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water frorh the aqufer The protect would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 51-2 Soil types on-site consist of Soboba Gravelly Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 13 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The matority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types on=site consist of Soboba Gravelly Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 51-3 These soils are typically used for dry-farmed seeded pastures No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The protect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanl~s, or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the protect a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (~) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (~) environment through reasonably foreseeable, upset , and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (~) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (~) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (~) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (~) would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area g) Impair implementation of or physically intertere with an () () () (~) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (~) loss, intury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adtacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ ~, Rev 4/20/05 C-34 Initial Study for SUBTT17651 ~, City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Lma man ' ^apNfitant lw Issues and Supporting Information Sources Focanaally S,pruficant wN, FLapabIXl rn.n SIpN6eaN No ~1 Inco teE 1 Comments. , „ a) The protect will not involve the transport, use, on,disposal of hazardous materials The City, participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that ~9ny other in the state. The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Mutti-Hazard Functional Plan to respond ,to chemioal emergencies Compliance wRh Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant'. No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed protect does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Mutti-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling'of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-signficant. No adverse impacts are anticipated ' c) There are schools located within 1/4 mile of the protect site The protect site is located within 1/4 mile of Summit Intermediate and Etiwanda Colony Elementary schools. Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated ' d) The proposed protect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials sde. Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is within 2 miles of a public airport The protect site is located approximately 8 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated i) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster Because the protect includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wddiand Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed protect site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 C-35 Rev 4/20/05 I '~i ' it Initial Study for SUBTT17651 City of Rancho Cucamonga ' I. Page 16 ' ', Lass men I I ~, Sigmfcant less I Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially S~gwncam With Mmgaaon Than sipnifcent I Mo I act Into retell ~ ~ cY S. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the pro/ect. a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () () (~) ( ) requirements b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (~) substantially with groundwater recharge such that ' ' there would be a net deficit m agwfer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g ,the , production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) ' c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the' O O O (~) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or aver, in a mahrter, which would result m substantial erosion or siltation on- of off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () ('~) site or area, including through the Iteration of the course of a stream or aver, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (`~) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () () ~ () (~) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (~) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate,Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (~) that would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant nsk of O O O (~) loss, infury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp f) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (~) Comments• a) Water and sewer seance is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water Distnct',(CVWD) The protect is designed to connect to the existing water and sewer systems The State of Califorrna is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requving a permit under the State's General NPDES permit The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits C-36 ~J Rev 4/20/05 C~ Initial Study for SUBTT17651 City of Rancho Cucamonga i Page 17 ~ ~ Less man i ' Sipnificam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Fotam,a0y significant wnn Miupanon, man spmficant No I ad Incg ratatl I 1 an Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or and' other activity for new development or significant redevelopment Prior to commencement of construction ,of a protect, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit The General permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading , Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP),that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters , Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation ' Perform inspections of all BMPs Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction protect fiischarges A construction protect for new development or significant redevelopment requires a NPDES Permit Construction protect proponents are required to prepare a SWPPP To comply with the NPDES, the protect construction contractor will be required to prepare a SWPPP during construction activities and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Madole & Associates, Inc on November 17, 2005, that identities BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils entering the drainage system after construction Runoff from driveways, roads, and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials Practices, such as' periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identdying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. ' 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance Rev 4/20/05 C-37 Initial Study for SUBTT17651 City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 18 Lass Then , Significbnt Lau Issues and Su ortn Intormatlon Sources pp g Finam,ally s,gmbcant vino Mingbbon ~nan $ipnennt No I an Into tea I I program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) Dunng construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff.' 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be perforrned prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construghon Operational 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water duality Management Plan (WG1MP) prepared by Madole and Associates, Inc. dated November 17, 2005, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. r1 L..-.J 6) Landscaping Plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth, Plans for these areas, Including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval I prior to the issuance of Grading Permits. b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from ground water in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as ~a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 47A feet below the ground surface As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact; however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facddies c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river A review of the property was prepared (Chamber$ Group, January 11, 2006) that concluded there are only two small, erosion-cut features about 500 feet long located on or immediately adtacent to the eastern property boundary These two features exhibit discontinuous shelving, sediment deposits, and destruction of vegetation They are also isolated from any known turisdictional waters of the United States The report concluded that these two features did not manifest the requisite bed, bank, and channel structure necessary for qualification as turisdictional streambed All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect design includes landscaping of ail non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to Rev 4/20/05 C-38 I ~), I Initial Study for SUBTT17651 City of~Rancho Cucamonga ~ Page 19 I Lass Then I ' $ipmficant Lev Issues and Su ortin Information Sources. pp g r°'Bn°°~N Sipnlficent W°~ MiLpat,on Th8° Siprcficent I No I act Into rele0 I I Issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, the, protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or ofi-site The Impact is not considered sigrnficant d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect well not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been de§igned to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace' water runoff because .of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Bui'ding Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits. Therefore, ' increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated I f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary • increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is for new development or significant redevelopment, therefote, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 7) Prior to Issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WOMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants Into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall Identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for ' New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official Tor coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse Impacts are expected h) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General • Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and Rev 4/20/05 C-39 ,,), Initial Study for SUBTT17651 City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Page 20 ~ Less Then i Significant Lev Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentiany Sipmficam wpm ALapebon $,pnl,°ent 'he" No ' ~ h In°ro W I ~ provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows ~ This~~existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6. The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected. There are no oceans, lakes or reservoirs near the prolect site, therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticpated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabnel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significancg within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project. a) Physically dnride an established community~~ ~ () ~ () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land usg plan, policy, or () () () ~ (/) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the prolect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () (/) () ( ) or natural community conservation ptan~ Comments: a) The site is surrounded by vacant land The prolect will become a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated b) The prolect site land use designation is Very Low Residential The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan and does not intertere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The prolect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the prolect site is within an area of sensitroe biological resources, therefore, development could adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals The mitigation measures listed under 4 a), b), and f) will reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan i. C-40 Rev 4/20/05 Initial Study for SUBTT17651 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 Less man ' Sipnficent Lrs . Issues and Supporting Information Sources '°te"Daily Sipnlficenl wan M,upetlan *>,." 9pilACNiI N° I act Inca tea I I Comments: I a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregates Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery sde, therefore, there is no impact ' 11. ~ NOISE. Would the pro/ect result rn a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (/) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (/) levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing , without the protects d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase, in O (/) O ( ) ambient noise levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels f) For a protect within the vicrndy of a private austnp, O O O (/) would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels Comments: a) The protect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out A Noise Study was required and prepared by DKS and Associates on November 29, 2005 The protect site is primarily impacted by noise from Banyan Street and from I-210 Freeway, which is located within 1,500 feet of the protect, and to a lessor extent from I-15 Freeway, which is located approximately 3,500 feet to the east Because of the distance, I-210 is not anticipated to create a significant impact for the protect site The future residential units will also experience some background noise impacts from the internal roadway of the proposed protect and the neighboring residential roadways The Exterior Noise Impact Study found that Lot No 42 is the only lot expected to exceed the 60dBA Ldn exterior noise standard, with an exterior noise level of 63 9 dBA Ldn With the proposed mitigation measure No i incorporated into the proposed protect, the future . levels will be below 59 3 dBA Ldn, which is below City standard Interior noise impact study found lots along Banyan Street (Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 42) wtll exceed the 45 dBA Ldn interior standard With the proposed mitigation measures 2, 3, 4, and 5 incorporated into the protect, the future interior noise level will be below the City standard C-41 Rev 4/20/05 1,` I 1,~~ 1 ' 1 ' Initial Study for SUBTT17651 City of;Rancho Cucamonga t Page 21 I i Lass man I I Sgnlllcant Less I Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g `°'antlally Slpnlllcant wlin Mmgaaon man Slpmfcant I No ect Inm Ieo I I C Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate'Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1; therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, thereas no impact 11. NOISE. Would the pro/ect result ~n a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (/) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies I b) Exposure of persons to or generatron of excessne () () ~ () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient 'noise O O O (/) levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protects ' d) A substantial temporary or periodic rncrease m O (/) O ( ) ambient noise levels m the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working m the protect area to excessive noise levels f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (/) would the protect expose people residing or working m the protect area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The protect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out A Noise Study was required and prepared by DKS and Associates on November 29, 2005 The protect site is primarily impacted by noise from Banyan Street and from I-210 Freeway, which is located within 1,500 feet of the protect, and to a lessor extent from I-15 Freeway, which is located approximately 3,500 feet to the east Because of the distance, I-210 is not anticipated to create a significant impact for the protect site The future residential units will also experience some background noise impacts from the internal roadway of the proposed protect and the neighboring residential roadways , The Exterior Noise Impact Study found that Lot No. 42 is the only lot expected to exceed the 60dBA Ldn exterior nose standard, with an exterior noise level of 63 9 dBA Ldn With the proposed mitigation measure No 1 incorporated into the proposed protect, the future levels will be below 59 3 dBA Ldn, which is below City standard Interior noise impact study found lots along Banyan Street (Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 42) will exceed the 45 dBA Ldn interior standard With the proposed mitigation measures 2, 3, 4, and 5 incorporated into the protect, the future interior noise level will be below the City standard • ., C-42 Rev 4/20/05 Initial Study for SUBTT17651 Issues and Supporting Information Sources City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Lees Then S,pn~fianl Leu Wih Then MNpaOOn &pnOnnl No Mitigation measures fisted below, would reduce'extenor and interior noise levels to less-than-significant levels Exterior: 1) The applicant shall provide a 6-foot high sound wall for Lot 42 facing Banyan Street. The sound barrier's weight shall be at least 3-112 pounds per square foot of face area and have no decorative cutouts or line-of-site openings between shielded area and the roadway. Interior: 2) The applicant shall provide a windows closed condition for homes on Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 42 facing Banyan Street. A windows closed condition requves a means of mechanical ventilation per the Uniform Building Code Standards. This shall be achieved with standard air conditioning or fresh air Intake system. 3) The applicant shall ensure that all air intake ducts on Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 42 will be oriented away from Banyan Street and shall incorporate at least 8 feet . of flexible fiberglass ducting and at least one 90 degree band. There shall be no other openings (mail slots, vents, etc.) in the exterior walls. 4) The applicant shall provlde exterlor walls with a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 46. Typical walls with this rating will have 2-inch by 4-inch studs or greater, 16 inches on center with R-13 Insulation, a minimum 7/8-inch exterior surtace of cement plaster and a minimum Interior surtace of 1/2-inch gypsum board. 5) The applicant shall provide window and door assemblies used throughout the protect that are free of cut outs and openings, well fitted and well weather-stepped. b) The uses associated with this type of prolect normally do not induce groundborne vibrations As such, no impacts are antiapated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities wdl not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not antiapated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the protect d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction egwpment, wdl generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 6) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8.00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a . national holiday. 7) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line. Rev 4/20/05 C-43 1,` I ,~ I I ' it Initial Study for SUBTT17651 City of Rancho Cucamonga ' I , Page 23 i ~ Less Than l ~ Si9n~LCent Less l Issues and Su ortin Inf rmation Sources pp g p Potentially Significant won Mitipauon roan sipmhcant ryo act Ineo tatetl I acl I act The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified m Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Budding Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in Intensity to a level of compliance with above noise, standards or halted. 8) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures wdlllreduce the disturbance created by on-site construction egwpment, however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials apd debris The following mitigation measure shall then be required ' 9) Hcul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m and 6.30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily taps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or,resldential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport Located approximately 7 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated ' f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Avport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the pro/ect a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (`~) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (~) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating O O O (~) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere • ,, Comments: a) The protect is surrounded by vacant land, however, is located within the Etiwanda community of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that is growing rapidly Construction • activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated No impacts are anticipated Rev 4/20/05 C-44 u Initial Study for SUBTT17651 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 ~m~ 9pnficem Lw Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g PotanUelly SiOnficant WM AUUpaoon Thin Sip.fienit No I ect IrKO teE 1 b) The protect site contains no existing housing uNts 'No adverse impact expected. ' c) The prolect site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental faalities, the construction of ' „ which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other peAormance objectives for any of the public services a) Fire protections () () () ('~) b) Police protectioM () () () (~) c) Schools O O O (~) tl) Parks () () () '~ ('~) e) Other public facibties~ ~ O U O (~) Comments: a) The site, located on Banyan Street, east of East Avenue, would be served by Fire Station No 176 located approximately 37 mile from the prolect site The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard Conditions of Approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the prolect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the prolect will not change ., the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the prolect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled c) The Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the prolect area Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development A Standard Condition of Approval will require the developer to pay the School Impact Fees With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered signrficant d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located 1/4 mile from the prolect site The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need tc construct new faalities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated r-1 LJ e) The proposed prolect will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase the demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected increase in library Rev 4/20/05 C-45 ,,` i I~yi I 11 I ' i Initial Study for SUBTT17651 City of Rancho Cucamonga t Page 25 ~ i Lass marl i ~ ~ ~ Significant Less I Issues and Supporting Information Sources PMenaally Sprvfiwnt Wnh A4upafion Than Sigrvfitant I No' I cl Incro tetl 1 I act space under the General Plan well not meet the protected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library 'services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations, was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent wdh the'Generai Plan far which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Viatorla Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, wtlich is in excess of the protected Sneed of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City 14. RECREATION. Would the protect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and O O O (~) regional parks or other recreational faalih~s such that substantial physical deterioration of the facihry would) occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational facih4es or O O O (~) require ;the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the enwronment~ ' Comments: ' a) The site is m a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park, Etiwanda Creek Park, is located 1/4 mile from the protect site This protect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated b) See a) response above 15. TRANSPORTATIONlfRAFFIC. Would the pro/ect a) Cause an increase rn traffic, which is substantial in () () () (~) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e , result in a substantial increase m either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (~) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result m a change m air traffic patterns, including O O O (~) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (~) (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) e) Result in inadequate emergency access O O O (~) • •, Rev 4/20/05 C-46 rte, ~~ Initial Study for SUBTT17651 City of Rancho Cucamonga j Page 26 ,i ~ Less roan ' Sgmficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potennaly Significant won Mniganon man Signdicant INO I an Inco rated I act I act f) Result in inadequate parking capacity f O O U (~) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (~) supporting alternative transportation , (e g ,, bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments: , f a) Implementation of the proposed prolect will generate 545 average vehicle trips daily The proposed prolect includes the development oY 56 homes The ITE trip generatwn handbook estimates that each single-family house will generate an average of 9 57 trips daily As noted in the General Plan iFEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute td the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan for which j:he FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed wkh street improvements existing or Included in the prolect design Thelprolect will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume or congestion at intersections The prolect site will be required to provide street improvement$ (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that) must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No impacts are anticipated b) The Rancho 'Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that the prolect of 56 homes will generate 99 75 two-way peak hour trips daily (42 75 during morning peak driving hour and 57 durng evening peak) In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects On May 16, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive'Transportation Fee Schedule updating these Development Impact Fees As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic I(npact Analysis reporting requirement This prolect will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted Transportation Development Fee prior to issuance of Building Permit The prolect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing The prolect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials The prolect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated c) Located approximately 7 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the~site The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated Rev 4/20/05 C-47 Initial Study for Sl1RTT17651 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 27 ~~ rru~ SI9rnfiCBM Lpa Issues and Supporting Information Sources Gotentlally yy~ury~¢nt WM Mi99a0on T1t~n 9pvfi[em ii° I c, Irico e0 1 ' , f) The protect design has adequatQ parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking - capacity No impacts are anticipated ' g) The protect design includes, or the protect will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation (e g , street widening) and vehicle trip reduction (e g , bicycle lane) 16. I UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the protect. a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (~) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (~) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Requre or result in the construction of new storm O O O (~) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (~) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or , are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (~) provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (~) capacity to accommodate the protect's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (~) regulations related to solid waste Comments• a) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated u b) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated c) All runoff will be conveyed to the existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Rev 4/20/05 C-48 C Initial Study for SUBTT17651 City of Rancho Cucamonga i Page 28 1 Less Than i $iprufitant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g a^ie^nally $ipmficam wnn MNpafion Than Sipnficam , No I ct In[o rated 1 I Official and City Engineer pnor to issuance of Grading Permits The impact is not considered significant d) The protect is served by the CVWD water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No impacts are anticipated ~ , e) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated i) Solid waste disposal wilt be provided by the current Ctty contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding ' solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated L~ • 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the () () (,) (~) quality of the environment, substantially reddce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually () () () (~) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) c) Does the protect have environmental effects that will () () () (~) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, edher directly or indirectly Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the sae is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 Rev 4/20/05 C-49 Initial Study for SUBTT17651 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 29 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of bwld-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence The City made findingsithat adoption of the General Plan would result in signficanf adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources ~ Mitigation, measures were adopted for .each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Gwdelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly , and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indvectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as hawng a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from aq quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts, associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation ' measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-sigf~ificant levels EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one , or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section , 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the fallowing earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The fallowing earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Department offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check ali that apply) ('17 General Plan FEIR ' (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (T) Etiwanda Specific Plan EIR (SCH #82061801, certified July 6, 1983) C-50 Rev 4/20/05 l~ ~ i ~ ~' ' ~I ~ •1 ~ i Irntial Study for ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT17651 y i~ Page 30 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION ,~ , I certify that I am the applicant for the prolect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the prolect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly o significant environmental effects would occur ~, Apphcant'sSignatur rl~/~ Cs ~ Datet~G/.z7~(~~ Pnnt Name and Title ~P ~ Jk+'~ C /"r ~ / iic'-"-SL~i~ f ~~IL~R~.-yea-/wt ~wlt /~^°^~ ~~ ,~ ~~ ~, , • • C-51 Rev 4/20/05 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration Js being circulated for publicreview in accordance wUh the Calffomia Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Publle Resoude~s Cody. Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17651 Public Review Period Closes: August 9, 2006 Project Name: Project Applicant: TAVA Development Company Project Location (also see attached map): Located approximately 1,200 feet east of East Avenue and south of Banyan Street-APN 0225-191-12. Project Description: A request to subdivide 41 32 gross acres of land mto 56 parcels in the Very Low Residential Distnct, FINDING This Is to advise that the Cky of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has coadudted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a sign cant effect on the environment snd Is proposing this Mkigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions m the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no s~gmficant effects would oxur, and (2) There ~s no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a sigmficant effect on the environment If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact RepoRwill not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding Is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-Z750or Fax (909)477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mkigated Negative Declaration during the review period. August 9 2006 Date of Determination Adopted By C-52 • 'f, RESOLUTION NO 06-75 ~ . A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17651, A REQUEST TO SU6DIVIDE 41 ACRES OF LAND INTO 56SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS W ITHIN THE VARY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED APROXIMATELY 1,200 FEET OF EAST AVENUE AND' SOUTH OF BANYAN STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0225-191-12 A. Recitals 1 Tava Development fled an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17651, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2. On the 9th day of August 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determineid, and resolved by the Planning •~ Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on August 9, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, ,this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows , a The application applies to property located on a vacant parcel on the south side of Banyan Street, with a street frontage of 1,326 47 feet and lot depth of 1,320 26 feet, and presently has no street improvements, and b The properties to the north, south, east, and west of the subject site are un- developed, and c The application proposes a subdivision creating 56 residential lots; and d. The project, together with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and e The application applies to the subdroision of land only, no house product is proposed, and • C-53 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-75 ' SUBTT17651 -TAVA DEVELOPMENT August 9, 2006 • Paget ~~ ~' f The proposed subdivision will have a gross density of two dwelling units per acre, which is consistent with the Very Low Residential District The Very Low Residential District requires a minimum net lot size of 20,000 square feet and a minimum average net lot size of 25,OOOsquare feet The applicant is proposing minimum netlot size of 20,133 square feet and an average net lot s¢e,of 25,053 square feet. ,, 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this ,Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: The proposed protect is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the obtectnres of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and c The proposed use is incompliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity. ' 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative • Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence thatthe project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigated Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows• a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA°) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the protect. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was'prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment,period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration b The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative DeclaratOn and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, fords (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared incompliance with CEQA, and (u) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission furtherfinds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent tudgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration c The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the protect that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during protect implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the protect C-54 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-75 SUBTT17651 -TAVA DEVELOPMENT August 9, 2006 Page 3 ' , d Pursuant to the requirements of California Fish and Game Code Section 711 fl acid Title 14 of the California Code'of Regulations, Section 753 5, the Planning Commission fords, based on the Initial Study, the Mitigated Negatroe Declaration, and considering the record as a whole, that there is no evidence before the City that the proposed protect will have the potential for an'adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wiltllife depends. Based on substantial evidence, the Planning Commission hereby makes a declaration rebutting the, presumption of adverse effect as set forth irnCalifornia Department of,Fish~and Game Regulation 753.5 (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Code, Section 753.5.) e The custodian of records for the Initial'Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of,proceedmgs upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based' is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Those documents are available for public review m the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Cmc Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, (909) 477-2750 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3'; and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the applicatibn subtect to each and every condition set forth below and m the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and, incorporated herein by this reference Plamm~g Department 1) Banyan Street (formerly called Summit Avenue) shall be improved per the standards of Etiwanda Specific Plan Figure 5-39. Engmeenno Department 1) Banyan Street frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Collector" standards. , a) Banyan Street has been constructed by others. The developer is responsible for reimbursing his fair share of the construction costs; b) No driveways to Banyan Street c) No mid-block trail crossings d) Install parkway community trail per Standard Drawing No 1002-A Dedicate 20 feet from the face of curb Install private gates for pertinent lots per Standard Drawing No. 1008 Install pass-through per Standard Drawing No. 1007 at Local Trail intersections 2) "E" at Banyan Streets shall align with the driveway for the proposed park on the north side of Banyan Street, creating, meffect, afour-way intersection a) Provide alert-turn-lane on Banyan Street (both directions) at said intersection b) Provide a traffic signal at said intersection with the Transportation Fee credit C-55 u ~~~ • • '~~ ~ ' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-75 ' SUBTT17651 -TAVADEVELOPMENT August 9, 2006 i Page 4 3) Street Community Trails on Banyan and "F" Streets shall be annexed into Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) No 7 The 12-foot trail ' along "E" Street shall also be annexed, but adjacent property owners are responsible for their sidq yard landscaping ' a) The Community trail on the south side of "F" Street shall be installed per Standard Drawing No 1002-B. Future development to the south will reconstruct per Standard Drawing No 1002-A. b) Install pass-through per Standard Drawing No 1007 at local trail intersections, Use Standard Drawing No. 1006-B where Local , Trail vehicular access crosses Community Trail on "E" Street. 4) Construct "E" Street along the vest property line as a "half-street" meeting' City "Collector Street" standards as regwred a)' Provide curb and gutter, asphalt paving (26 feet width), and Community Trail (20 feet Width). b) ,Dedicate, at a minimum, 48 feet~(includes 2 feet clearance from the tract boundary.) c) A good faith effort shall be made to obtain rights-of-way for installation of full width improvements along the two developed . lots on the southern-most west tract boundary If not obtained, tran$ition the street to avoid hawng a "half-street" that will never be completed. ' d) Community Trail fences are to be set back for line-of-sight at intersections. e) Provide 5800 lumen HPSV street lights. f) Provide traffic striping and signage, as required ' g) Provide R26(s) °No Stopping" signs. 5) All internal streets to be improved in accordance with City °Local Street" standards including: a) Local Rural Streets per the Etiwanda Specific Plan allow for a 55-foot right-of-way with a sidewalk on one side only. b) Provide 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlights c) Provide traffic striping and signage. d) Provide drive approaches for vehicular access to Local Trails. All concrete that crosses the trails shall be medium broom finish Provide curbside drain outlets for Local Trail drainage facilities C-56 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-75 SUBTT17651 -TAVA DEVELOPMENT August 9, 2006 , Page 5 6) The Master Plan Storm Dram (Line 6a) in Banyan Street shall be installed from Etiwanda Channel to its westerly terminus, including ' connection to the existing culvert, to the satisfaction of the City , • Engineer Construction of drainage facilities shall be performed ~to minimally disrupt traffic Construction scheduling is subject to approval , ' of the City Engineer and may regwre night construction and reopening of Banyan Street to full traffic during the day The developer is eligible , for Master Plan fee credit and/or reimbursement consistent with the drainage policy. Thg developer may, request a reimbursement agreement to recover oversizing costs, in excess of fees, from future development within the same tributary area If the developer fads to , ' submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the ~ terminate developer to reimbursement shall 7) The final Drainage Report shall address hydrology and hydraulics of ' the Master Plan Storm Drain (Line 6a) in Banyan Street and the local storm dram from the site to Line XIV-18 (upstream of Victoria Basin). In addition, the report shall determine whetherthe site is protected from breakout of the portion of the Etiwanda Spreading Grounds levee , remaining after SBCFCD completes the Etiwanda Creek debris basin,' or if additional mitigation measures are needed. 8) Parkway Community Trails can be shown on street improvement plans. . 9) Install local storm drains to convey all development drainage to the Victoria Basin Master Plan Storm Dram System The cost of local storm drams shall be borne by this development with no fee credit. a) All sump catch basins and laterals shall be designed to handle O,oo b) Extend the local storm dram system as far on-site as needed to ' contain Ozs within tops of curbs, O~oo within rights-of-way and ' provide a 10-foot dry lane in O,o ' c) The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover oversizing costs from future development within the same tributary area If the developer fads to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate 10) Runoff shall not enter Community Trails and run across trail surface. Perimeter walls along the trails shall not have weep holes that allow such drainage Provide curbside dram outlets as needed at concentration points. C-57 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-75 SUBTT17651 -TAVA DEVELOPMENT August 9, 2006 Page 6 • 11) Where private cross lot drainage facilities discharge to public streets, inlets to curbside drain outlets or public storm drams shall be designed to function (not become blocked) in the absence of regular maintenance Show the prvate inlets on the public improvement plans for reference. ' 12) The site shall be rough graded to eliminate all cross-lot drainage, (except in approved faalities adtacent to private trails). The Rough Grading Plan showing all slopes and retaining walls necessary to accomplish this shall be approved pnor to final map approval. 13) Where Private Local Trail gradients exceed 4 percent, water bars, splash curbs, or other diversionary devices shall be used. Where a downstream end of a trail meets a street, the trail shall be graded at no more than 0 5 percent for a, distance of 25 feet from the nght-of-way line to prohibit the deposit of tratl surface debns onto the sidewalWstreet. Provide curbside drain outlets for adtacent drainage devices 14) Side yard walls should stop at the return wall for houses, with concrete headers for the Community Trad (where applicable) continuing to the sidewalk, so homeowner responsibilities are more visible on °E° Street. Only the trail will be maintained by the City Street trees and side yard landscaping shall be maintained by adtacent homeowners. Side yards should also stop at the return wall for houses on parkways with sidewalk (Section F). ' 15) Install private landscaping and irngation systems in the parkways of Corner Lots 1, 11, 12, 22, 23, 34, 35, 45, 46, and 56 pnor to public improvements being accepted by the City. 16) Complete the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and identify applicable Best ,Management Practices (BMPs) on the Grading Plan 17) Maintenance of BMPs identified in the WQMP shall be addressed in the protect Covenants, Conditions, and Restnctions (CC&Rs). 18) Public improvement plans shall be 90 percent complete pnor to the issuance of grading permits. Public improvement plans shall be 100 percent complete, signed by the City Engineer, and an improvement agreement and bonds executed by the developer, pnor to building permit issuance. Environmental Mitigation Aesthetics 1) New Eucalyptus windrows shall be planted a minimum of 2,050 linear feet in 5-gallon size as regwred by the Etiwanda Specific Plan. C-58 '~,~, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-75 SUBTT17651 -TAVA DEVELOPMENT August 9, 2006 ~ Page 7 , ~ , 2) The existing,Eucalyptus windrows and other trees shall be removed and replaced with 5-gallon Eucalyptus Maculata "spotted gum," spaces 8 feet on center Air Quabry ~ i 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained m good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobdeiconstructiQn egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air C~uality Management Distract (SCAOMD) as well as City Planning Staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAOMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand orhigh-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted m SCAOMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adtacent public thoroughfares or occur as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) m accordance with Rule 403 requirements C-59 '~ ~~ LJ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-75 SUBTT17651 - TAVA DEVELOPMENT August 9, 2006 Page 8 ' Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means 6) The site shall be treated wlth water or other soil-stabilizing agdnt (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board ' [RW OCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean altemattve fuel ' powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor' shall ensure that Construction-Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equpment when not in use. 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to ' incorporate high-effiaency/low-polluting heating, air condrtiornng, appliances, and water heaters 11) All residential and commercal structures shall be regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stepping Biological Resources 1) If the site is developed more than 2 years after the date of the original biological surveys, new focused surveys for the California Gnatcatcher, San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat and the Los Angeles Pocket Mouse (LAPM) shall be performed prior to issuance of any clearing and grubbing, Grading or Budding Permits 2) The developer shall purchase and preserve off site lands to provide substitute resources at a ratio of 1 1 equaling 2.6 acres 3) The developer shall collect seeds of the Plummer's mariposa Idyand/or transplant bulbs under the direction of a qualified restoration ecologist 4) Construction limits shall be fenced with temporary chain link fencing prior to any site clearing and grubbing or any other disturbance and prior to issuance of any grading or budding permits to protect preserved areas 5) The developer shall hire a biologist to monitor vegetation clearing and initial grading to minimize potential effects to common wildlife species and California Special Concern Species. 6) In the event that vegetation clearing or tree removal is necessary t 31 th h A ugus ), e during the bird breeding season (February 15 throug developer shall hire a qualified biologist to conduct a preconstruction survey to identify the locations of nests within the areas affected by C-60 5 • I` ~ ~i ~ PLANNING CdMMISSION RESOLUTION N0.06-75 SUBTT17651 -TAVA DEVELOPMENT August 9, 2006 I Page 9 , clearing If the biologist finds an active nest within or adtacent to these areas, then the biologist shall delineate an appropriate buffer zone around the nest, marked by flagging or fenang, and construction or clearing shall not be conducted within this buffer zone until the biologist determines that the nest is no longer actwe'~ 7) Prior to completion of the protect construction actvities each day, the developer shall remove all trash and debris to avoid attracting wildlife. 8) New Eucalyptus windrows shall be planted a minimum of 2,050 linear feet in 5-gallon size as regwred by the Etiwanda Specific Plan. , g) Existing Eucalyptus windrows and other trees shall be removed and' replacecJ with 5-gallon Eucalyptus Maculata "spotted gum," spaced 8 feet on center , Cultural Resources 5~' 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a' qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will. Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modificatign without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdelines. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) If any paleontological resource (i e. plant or animal fossils) are _ encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to momtor construction actvities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , C-61 ,~ , ~, L1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-75 ~ , SUBTT17651 - TAVA DEVELOPMENT , August 9, 2006 ~ • Page 10 , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include; but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor,'trained and egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minihial construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing actiwties. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing ~ctnrdies elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report .and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e ,San Bernardino County Museum) • Submit a summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. ' Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of yearof construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Actromes• 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Bwlding Offiaal for approval, Storm W ater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) . that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction actiwties entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical C-62 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0.06-75 SUBTT17651 -TAVA DEVELOPMENT August 9, 2006 ~ Page 11 , 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that' identifies speafic measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing actroities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum. , a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize sod exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenande program shall be included to ensure that any erosion whicH does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sedimentfrom the site when there is rainfall or other ruhoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site Post-Construction Activities: 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by, Madole & Assoaates, Inc. dated November 17, 2005, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 6) Landscaping Plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans forthese areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits 7) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a W OMP, including a protect description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 8) Priorto issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, applicantshall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General • Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Controi Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e , a copy of C-63 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-75 SUBTT17651 -TAVA DEVELOPMENT August 9, 2006 Page 12 ' the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Budding Offiaal for coverage under the NPDES General ' Construction Permit ' Noise Exterior 1) The applicant shall provide a 6-foot high sound wall for Lot 42 fa~mg Banyan Street The sound barrier's weight shall be at least 3-1/2 pounds per square foot of face area and have no decorative cutouts or Ime-of-site openngs between shielded area and the roadway Interior: 2) The applicant shall provide a windows closed condition for homes on Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 42 facing Banyan Street A windows closed condition requires a means of mechanical ventilation per the Uniform Bwlding Code Standards. This shall be achieved with standard air conditioning or fresh air intake system. • 3) The applicant shall ensure that all air intake ducts on Lots 1, 2, 3, 4 and 42 will be oriented away from Banyan Street and shall incorporate at least 6 feet of flexible fiberglass ducting and at least one 90 degree bend There shall be no other openings (mad slots, vents, etc) m the exterior walls 4) The applicant shall provde exterior walls with a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 46 Typical walls with this rating will have 2-inch by 4-inch studs or greater, 16 inches on center with R-13 insulation, a minimum 7/8-inch exterior surface of cement plaster and a minimum interior surface of 1/2-inch gypsum board 5) The applicant shall provide window and door assemblies used throughout the protect that are free of cut outs and openings, well fitted and well weather-stripped 6) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8'00 p m. and 6.30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 7) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards speatied m Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property Ime The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified m Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the . Bwlding Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the C-64 , PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-75 SUBTT17651 -TAVA DEVELOPMENT August 9, 2006 I Page 13 , Bwldmg Offipial If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction' activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted ~' 8) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible m first phase ~, 9) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p m. and 6'30 a m on weekdays, including~'Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Nose Mitigation, Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible,~,the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings , 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF AUGUST 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of August 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES: COMMISSIONERS. NOES' COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS. • ,, ,, ., C-65 City of Rancho Cucamonga • MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17651 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use m implementing the mmgation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed proietrt. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implefnented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code). ' Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements. 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect, 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who wtll take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance wdl be reported. The MMP has been designed to prowde focused, yet flexible gwdelmes As monitoring . progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. ' Program Management -The MMP will be m place through all phases of the protect. The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps wdl be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City m performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified m the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who wdl take action, what action wdl betaken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation wdl be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Ciwc Center Drive • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 C-66 Mitigation Monitoring Program Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17651 ~ i Page 2 , I ~ 3. Appropriate specialists wtll be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the prolect planner or responsible City department, to inomtor specific mitgation activities and provde appropriate written approvals )o the prolect planner ~ ' 4. 'the prolect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the speafic phase of development ' 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further momtonng wdl be signed off as completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. ~ , 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arse' requirng the refinement or addition of mdigabon measures. The prolect planner is responsible for approving ahy such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by,the prolect planner or responsible Citydepartment and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the vJork of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring afterwntten notification has been issued The prolect planner or responsible City department also has the . authority to hold certificates of occupanaes if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre momtonng after prolect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Diwsion The Diwsion shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City: These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time In those instances requinng long-term prolect momtonng, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for momtonng the mitigation activties at the prolect site and reporting the moriitonng results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring reporting plan shall conform to the Citys MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits • C-67 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17651 Applicant: Tava Development ~~~~•~~~ ..••.•.y ~~~Na~~~ uy: you ~eoiance Date: March 2. 2008 .. ... -. "Aesthetics''` ~ • ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " New Eucalyptus windrows shall be planted a minimum CP D r , of 2,050 linear feet, in 5-gallon size, as required by the C A 3 Etiwanda Specific Plan. The existing Eucalyptus windrows and other trees shall CP D be removed and replaced with 5-gallon Eucalyptus C A 3 - Maculata "spotted gum," spaced 8 feet on center All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans A/C y operating condition so as to reduce operational q - emissions The contractor shall ensure that all - _ _ _ construction equipment is being properly serviced and _ maintained as per manufacturers' speafications - Maintenance records shall be available at the - _ constructionsite for City verification - - Pnor to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the CPBO C Review of plans C - - - 2 developer shall submd Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected - egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was _ - - investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air puality Management District (SCAOMD) as well as City - - Planning Staff. _ - All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 pertormance standards noted in SCAOMD Rule 1113. _ Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or - - - high-volume, low-pressure spray. - n au 1 of 10 - - - .. . _. ~: . . All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards CE B Review of plans A/C = 2 noted in SCAOMD Rule 1108- All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAOMD BO C Review of plans A/C Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall 2/q include the following provisions = • Reestablish ground cover o th n e construction site BO C Revi f l through seeding and watering ew o p ans A/C 2/4 • Pave or appl ravel to BO y g any on-site haul roads. C R f l eview o p ans A/C 2/q • Phase gradin to rev t th BO g p en e susceptibility of large C R f l areas to erosion over extended periods of time eview o p ans A/C 2/4 • Schedule activities t BO o minimize the amounts of C Review of plans A/C y4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 ~ accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices - • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adfacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing mayvarydepending upon the time of year of -- _ - construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) m accordance with construction SCAOMD Rule 403 regwrements _ - • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction suitable means. The site shall be treated with water or other BO C- During A - 4 sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and - construction Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) dairy to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM~a) emissions;-in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403. - - 2 of 10 • .. • ~ .. ~ -. ~. . . .. . . Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C Durin q RWOCB) shall be applied to all mactive construction g q areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to construction • reduce PM~o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C alternative fuel powered egwpment where feasible Review of plans A/C q The construction contra t h ll BO c or s a ensure that Construction-Grading Plans include a statement that C Review of plans A/C yq work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use _ - All residential and comm l t ercia s ructures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C yq required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting , heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters _ All residential and commercal structures shall be 80 C1D Review of plans C p/4 requred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stepping. __ ~Biologlcal}~es~Fes ,~ ,_ ~ r ••~ . . ... ` ap • ~.., ,•. , ~ _ - ~ ~ ; . ,~ ,~ , , ~., :_~.,~°~~. , ~;~ ^~-~. ~;;~~~ic,~ dr.^ ,~ _ *t"^. y. ~~. ,, , _ <•~ . '"= If the sit e is developed more than 2 years after the date CP B C , - of the ongmal biological surveys, new focused surveys -- A - y4 -- for the California Gnatcatcher, San Bernardino __ -- Kangaroo Rat, and the Los Angeles Pocket Mouse shall - _ -- -- - _ be pertormed prior to issuance of any clearing and _ _ _- grubbing, Grading or Building Permits - - The developer shall purchase and preserve off-site CP B B C/B/D D - -1 lands to prowde substitute resources at a ratio of 1 1 -- equaling 2 6 acres. The developer shall collect seeds of the Plummer's CP D A A A 3 - manposa Idy and/or transplant bulbs under the direction of a qualified restoration ecologist Construction limits shall be fenced with temporarychain CP B A A A y4 link fencing prior to any site clearing and grubbing orany - other disturbance and prior to issuance of any grading or _ _ - - building permits to protect the preserved areas C c 310 - n V 1 s s .. ... .. _ ... The developer shall hire a biologist to monitorvegetation CP C A clearing and initial grading to minimize potential effects - A - A 4 to common wildlife species and California Special Concern Speaes In the event that vegetation clearing or tree removal is CP C necessary during the bird breeding season (February 15 A A A 4 through August 31), the developer shall hire a qualified - biologist to conduct a preconstruction survey to identify _ the locations of nests within the areas affected by clearing If the biologist finds an active nest within or adjacent to these areas, then the biologist shall _ - dehneate an appropriate buffer zone around the nest , marked by flagging or fencing, and construction or _ clearing shall not be conducted within this buffer zone until the biologist determines that the nest is no longer active Prior to completion of project construction activities each CP C - day, the developer shall remove all trash and debris to A A A 4 avoid attracting wdd6fe. - New Eucaiyptus windrows shall be planted, a mwmum CP C A - of 2,050 linear feet in 5-gallon size as regwred by the _ A A - 4 - Etiwanda Specific Plan _ - - - - Existrng Eucalyptus windrows and other trees shall be CP D - C A removed and replaced with 5-gallon Eucalyptus - 3 - - Maculata 'spotted gum; spaced 8 feet on center CulturaPResource~` ~.h~. ,~ u,~ .,:~r~ ~~~ W , ~ r. ,~ k j~'x %`-+hi ~` i'` s^ ' ,~~. K ~~ i4,r~' ~ ' :/" .; ~•~r~~~~- s.-c.1'Y ~w„ f~t5-, ~z: ~'~.^a~ ~ tSa';? ~ ,~'~ L;' # ~i> ~, . ~~~"° are ~° " C . 1;~y-~ ..~~, _ - ~. , y . ;yi x e ~ 1 y, q~ If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer Nell _ retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction - activrfies, to take appropriate measures to protect or _ - preserve them for study. With the assistance of the - _ archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wdl: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CPBO C Rewew of report A/D 3/4 sties from demohfion or signrficant modrfication - - without an opportunity for the City to establish rfs archaeological value - 4 of 10 • Consider establishing provisions to require CPBO C Review of report A/D _ - 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a _ theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's CPBO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CPBO C Review of report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA _ - guidelmes • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with n original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County _ _ N Archaeological Information Center for permanent - - _ _ archnnng. - - If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal CP f3 Review of report A/D - 4 fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the - developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to mondor - - _ - construcUon actiwUes, to take appropriate measures to _ _ _ _ - protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist _ shall submit a report of findings that will also provide - - specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i a ,paleontological monitoring) that may be - appropnate Where mitigation mondonng is appropriate, - - the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: - • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of report A/D _ 4 egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with - - - minimal construction delay, to the site full-time - dunng the interval of earth-disturbing activities 510 .. , .. , ~ -, . .. . . • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of report A!D - - - 4 _ or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities -- elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage - If construction personnel make the discovery, the - grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the mondor of the find • Prepare identify and curate ll CP D , , a recovered fossils for Re f D 3 documentation in the summary report and transfer to wew o report an appropriate depository (i e , San Bernardino County Museum) • Submit summa re rt t C CP D ry po o ity of Rancho Review of report D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum `ebiogy and'Soll~r~ , ~ ~;;~ ,} I . ~ t -~ . _ m r ~~ W~~ ~~., i~ ' .i ., tR~+ ~ T; ^ yr ~, ~' ~f ~ tt .. S a + - ~ ~ ': w `r'te. ~`.~, rt 1. e$, v''i .. -/i t ~..-r °„~t: The site shall be treated with water or other BO C Durin A - soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and - g construction 4 _ RWOCB) dailyto reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance - _ with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought _ resistant landscaping as soon as possible Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o _ construction _ - _ emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil oft-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of - year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction from the site during such episodes. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A 4 - RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction - - areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 6 of 10 . - .. .. H tlrology aril ~y;°~;,r~F;,.,~v„'~~;~',~'~;' v y 'WaterOUallt ~ .+~,v.r(,n • .- '~^r .. .,, w ~ ~~ - k:4 Si~~w.y~p v~cf. sr,~~,~,_, - .1 K - rv , Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C ~ yq shall submit to Bwldmg Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. _ An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C Grading Plan, and implementedforthe proposed protect - yq that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing - actrviues are initiated through compleUOn of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum. a) Specify the timing of 'grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to - ramy penodsexperienced msouthern California, and b) - - _ An inspection and maintenance program shall be - - included to ensure that any erosion which does occur - either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be _ • ' - corrected through a remediation or restoration program _ - within a specified time frame - _ _ During construction, temporary berms such as BO 8/C/D, Review of plans A/C y4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent a - discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 cleaning wdl be pertormed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in CE = B/C/D- Review of plans A/C y4 the W ater Quality Management Plan (WOMP) prepared by Madole and Associates, Inc dated November 17, 2005, to reduce pollutants after _ construction entering the storm drain system to the = maximum extent practical. _ n J A 7~ 0 n v • - - -- • .. ~ . .. . . Landscaping plans shall ~nctude provisions for BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C . -- - y4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pestiades/herbiades Landscaped areas shall _ be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum oT two years, shall be submitted to the Cityfor review and approval pnor to the issuance of Grading Permits Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WOMP, 2/4 including a protect description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent wdh the Gwdehnes for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 Prwr to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C y4 applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been _ - obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Con struction Permit Q -NoiSe~. ^fk~• ~~ ~ ~ p j j` r xM `l ~jj •y Yq ~X' hf ~Tt:' A ' ~r~ :4 •il YW .~~~~ ,4 J P ~ } Y. . . 5 The applicant shalt provide a 6-foot high sound wall for CP CB C/A C/A 1/3 lot 42 facing Banyan Street The sound barner's weight shall be at least 3-1/2 pounds per square foot of face - area and have no decorative cutouts or line-of-site _ openings between shielded area and the roadway. 8of10 ~ ~ . -. . .. The applicant shall provide a windows closed condition CP CB C/A C/A 1 /3 for homes on Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 42 facing Banyan Street A windows closed condtion requires a means of mechanical ventilation per the Uniform Bwlding Code Standards. This shall be achieved with standard air conditioning or fresh air intake system - The applicant shall ensure that all av intake ducts on CP CB C/A C/A Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 42 will be oriented away from 1/3 Banyan Street and shall incorporate at least 6 feet of flexible fiberglass ducting and at least one 90 degree _- bend There shall be no other openings (mail slots, _ vents, etc) in the exterior walls , The applicant shall provide exterior walls with a CP CB C/A C/A 1/3 minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 46 Typical walls with this rating will have 2-inch by 4-inch studs or greater, 16 inches on center with R-13 _ insulaUOn, a minimum 7/8-inch exterior surtace of cement plaster and a minimum interior surtace of - 1/2-inch gypsum board = The applicant shall provde window and door assemblies CP CB C//~ C/A - ~ 1 /3 ~ - used throughout the protect that are free of cut outs and openings, well fitted and well weather-stripped ~ _ ~ - - " - Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C - During A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6.30 a m on weekdays, construction _ including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a - national holiday - C' a i 9~0 •_ ~ -. . .: !Is shall not exceed the BO C During q - - - 4 ~ment Code Section ie property Ilne The construction nt to pertorm weekly _ _rfled in Development Code Sectlon 17 02 120 Monitoring at othertimes may be required by the Building Official Sald consultant shall report their findings to the Budding Offical wrthrn 24 _ - hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall Immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above - standards, then construction activities shall be reduced - in Intensity to a level of compliance with above noise = standards or halted _ The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During q q as possible In the first phase. constructOn _ Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the POGO C During q - - hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction 4n Including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a - national holiday Additionally, If heavy trucks used for _ _ hauling would exceed 100 dally trips (counting both to _ - _ and from the construction site), then the developer shall - _ prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any - - _ _ construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, _ _ - the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass - _ - sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. c. ..., ...............~..,....,~.,a.,..,~~ ~~Re"s on ibefp"~`s- P. .~~ ~. a ~ 9 ,a Asa .~i ~ ' ~ ,K . t ~..~,~ ~ """^ ky , ;~ •,- .~ ,_v, .~,_., .~ ,~ s ~.,~ , e,~l,-~ brit ' 2 ~`~" 'r~ a rs-~ ,<»; ...~~ YH G ,. '~ cxlons-~a, tvfe , ~^y~,.a.,~~;,z~.,.i.~,, ,.~~~ ~~'r ~; CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection i -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B -Prior To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit - CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 - Wdhhold Certdicate of Occupancy _ BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studtes/Pians) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee - 6 -Revoke CUP 10 of 10 - I,` ~~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT , - ~ DEPARTMENTS STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17651 SUBJECT: ~ TRACT MAP FOR 56 LOTS APPLICANT: TAVA DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: SOUTHSIDE OF BANYAN AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 1,200 FEET EAST OF EAST AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO Y, OUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Coin IeLOn Dat A. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Cdy, its ~~_ agents, offtcers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or in the attematrve, to relinquish such approval The appllcant shall reimburse the City, Its agents, offtcers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the Ctty, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at Its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition B. Time Limits , 1 This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning ~~_ Commission, unless a complete final map Is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which Include ~~_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file In the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director C-78 I \PLANNING\fINAL\PLNGCOMMt2006 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT7651 StdCond 8-9 doc Project No SU6TT77651 Comdetion Date 3 All site, grading, landscape, Irrigation, and street Improvement plans shall be coordinated for • consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment building, etc) or prior to final map approval In the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 4 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at they time of bwlding permit issuance 5 Ail ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to thb satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed In underground vaults 6 Street names shall be submitted for Plarning Director review and approval in accordance witft the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map I 7 A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, In accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, In conjunction with street improvements. a Local Feeder Trails (i a ,private equestrian easements) shall, at a minimum, be fenced with two-rail, 4-Inch lodgepole "peeler" logs to define both sides of the easement, however, developer may upgrade to an alternate fence material b Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach Entrance . shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs c Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0 5% at the downstream end of a trail for a distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibd trail debris from reaching the street Drainage devices may be required by the Building Official d Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot corral area in the rear yard Grade access from corral to trail with a maximum slope of 5 1 and a minimum width of 10 feet e For single family residential development within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay District, at least one model home shall be provided with a constructed 24-foot by 24-foot corral with appropriate fencing I The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine animals where zoning requirements forthe keeping of said animals have been met. Indmdual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a Ilst of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 10 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape • maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Clty Engineer review and approved prior to the Issuance of building permits C-79 z ~_/_ _/_l- ~~ /- ~~_ ~~- ~~_ ~~. J~- ~-.,J- ~~- ~~- ~-/- I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Ras & Sd Rpt\SUBT17651 StdCond 8-9 doc D. E. ply ~, ' q Prgec t No SUBTT17651 ' ~ ~ ~ ~, Completion Date ,,, 11 Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot of dwelling _/_/_ ~, unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a sola4 energy system The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision ' • or issuance of permts, which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordahon of the final map ~, whichever comes first The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, ,~ structures, fixtures, or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17 08 060-G-2 ' 12 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along~the project perimeter If a double wall ~~_ ' ~, condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining , ' property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prror to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter , 13 On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk The ___/~_ 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees Detailed landscape and irrigation plaris shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of budding permits The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigatiorl,shall be maintained by the property owner The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a , cash deposit on any property Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street ~~_ Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/~~ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by,a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits or ~ ~ prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 All private slopes of 5 feet or more In vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 ~~ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 3. Atl private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2.1 or greater ~~_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or _ larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prror to occupancy 4. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously ~~_ maintained In a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 5 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included In ~~_ the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department • C-80 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT7651 S1dCond 8-9 doc it Protect No SUBTT17651 Completion Date 6 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located In putilic maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department , ~F. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department'pnor to installation of any signs' G. Environmental ~' 1 Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on-and off-site A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to final occupancy release The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA 2 A final acoustical report Shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits The final report shall disc}iss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction tebhniques provided, ,and rf appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures cbntained in the final report 3 The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards Certification shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes 4. Mitigation measures are required for the project The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $495 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the, Cdyto retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit 5. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i e) beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Director prior to issuance of building permits Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented H. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits C-81 4 -~-~- i ~_~- -/~ _l-/ ~~. ~~ ~~_ ~-/- I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT7651 StdCond 8-9 doc ,), • Project No SUBTT17651 • Comoletion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONRITIONS: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) OTE : N I. General Requirements , 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following ~ ~-/- a, Sde/Plot Plan; ~ , b Foundation Plan, ~ ' c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, , e ~ Electncal Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size ~ • of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isgmetrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and ' g Planning Department Pro)ect Number (i e , SUBTT17651) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report ~~_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to ~-J the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls ~ -~~- 5 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can ~-J- contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements J. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be ~~_ marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2001-00001) The applicant shall complywith the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in ' effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential protect or mafor addition, the applicant ~~_ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance 3 The Building and Safety Official shall provide street addresses after tracUparcel map recordation ~~_ and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday ~ /_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays C-82 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMMi2006 Res 8 Stf Rpt\SUBTT7651 StdCond 8-9 dx ,,y Protect No SUBTr17651 Completion Date K. New Structures I i , 1 Provide compllance with the California Budding Code (CBC) for property Ilne clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provlde compllance with the Callfornla Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3 Roofing material shall be Installed per the manufacturer's "high wend" Instructions •~ L. Grading 1 Grading of the subfect property shall be In accordance with Callfornla Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be In substantial conformance wdh the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Callfornla to perform such work 3 A geological report shall,be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 4 The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where Improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fell. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Clvd Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~ ' M. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the Clty for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 38 total feet on Banvan Street 3 Corner property Irne cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 4 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map 5 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map 6 The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and If he/she should fail to do so, the • developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Sections 66462 and C-83 ~-/- i ~~- ~~- ~-/_ -/-/- / / -/~ -J-/ ~~- / / ~~ ~~_ ~~- ~-/ ~~- I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM~2006 Res & Stt Rpt\SUBTT7651 SidCond 8-9 doc '•) I ' Protect No SUBTT17651 • Completion Date 66462 5 at such time as the Clry decides to acquire the property Interests require~J for the improvements Such agreement shall provide'for payment by the developer of all costs Incurred by the City if the City decides to acquire the off-site property interests requred in connection with the subdivision Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form bf a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal, report obtained by the City, at developer's cost The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal This condition applies In partcular, but not limited to local storm drainage facilities connechng to the Victoria Basin Master Plan Svstem , N. Street Improvements 1 All public Improvements (Interiorstreets, drainagefaalitles, communltytralls, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street Improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement; drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, street trees, and curbside drain outlets 2 POrsuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, In addition'to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all Improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and aocepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those butldings, or units proportionate to the ~COmpletion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more )han 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected~to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all Improvements required by these conditions of approval of development. 3 A minimum of 26-foot wide pavement, within a 40-foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be constructed for all half-section streets ~ , 4 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to. Street Name Curb & Gutter AC Pvmt Slde- walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm T211 Median Island Bike 7rell Other Banyan Street X X X X X Notes (a) Median Island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item • 5 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and Intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the Clty Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Clty Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, priorto final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertormed In public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and Interconnect conduit shall be Installed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer • ~~- -/.y/- ~~ ~~~ ~~- -/~- ~-~. C-84 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMMt2006 Res & Sd Rpt\SUBTT7651 StdCond 8-9 doc Project No SUBTT17651 ' Completion Data d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be Installed with any new construction or reconstruction _/~_ protect along mator or secondary streets and at Intersections for future traffic signals and , . Interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both skies of the street at 3 feet outslde~ of BCR, ECR, or any other locations apprgved by the Clty Englneer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at Intersectlons and No 5 along streets, a maximurrt of 20d' feet apart, unless otherwise specdied by the CIry Engineer , " ~ 2) Conduit shall be 3-Inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be Installed on all corners of Intersectlons per Clty ~~_ Standards or as directed by the Clty Englneer f Existing City roads requiring constructlon shall remain open to trafflc at all times with ~~_ adequate detours during constructlon Street or lane closure permits are required A cash , deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be ~~_ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan I ~~_ check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per Clty Standards in ~, ~~ accordance with the City's street tree program 7 Install street trees per Clty street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed ~_/ • legend (box below) and constructlon notes shall appear on the title page of the street Improvement plans Street improvement plans shall Include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be Installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typlcally sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree Installation In those areas shall be per the public landscape Improvement plans The Clty Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Spate Spacing Size Oty. Banyan Street lagerstroemia Indica Lavendar Crape Myrtle 3 tt 20 ft 24-inch 'Muskogee` Hybnd o c box Provide Street Select appropnate tree from approved street tree list List each street as B Names separate item in this legend Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted In accordance with Clty standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic Bolls report shall be furnished to the Clty Inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soli amendments, as determined by the Clty Inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to Inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public Improvement plans only 8 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the Clty Engineer for conformance with ~~_ adopted policy On collector or larger streets, Imes of sight shall be plotted for all protect Intersections, Including driveways Local residential street Intersectlons and commercial or • Industrial driveways may have Imes of sight plotted as required C-85 0 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMMI2006 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT7651 StdCond 8-9 doc ~~l ~ , i Protect Na SU8TT17651 Comolehon Date O. P. Q. Public Maintenance Areas ~, II ' 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plpns per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be T/_/_• submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, ', easements, trolls or other areas shall be annexed Into the Landscape Maintenance District Banvan 2 Public landscape areas are required to Incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble or ~~_ ' other acceptable non-irngated surtaces ' 3. A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting _/~_ , Distracts shall be filed with the Clty Engineer pnor to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer ' 4. All required public landscaping and' irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the ~_/_ developer until accepted by the Clty , Drainage and Flood Cdntrol ~' hall be the developer's responsibility to have the curfent FIRM Zone D designation removed 1 It ~~_ s from the protect area The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain an unshaded `X` designatidri ~ The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydrautlc calculations A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR)~ shall be obtained from FEMA prior'to firial map approval or Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A Letter of Map Revision (CONK) shall be issued by FEMA pnor to occupancy or Improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. 2 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer pnor to final map _/_/_ approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first Ail drainage facilities shall • be mstalled as required by the Clty Engineer. , 3 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surtace drainage entering the ~~_ property from adtacent areas 4. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured ~_/_ from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk 5 Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage In a ~~ sump catch basin on the p'ubllc street, and provisions made to pass through walls Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/~ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) In accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/~_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/~_ Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D Is required prior to final map approval or Issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the Issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects C-88 9 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT7651 StdCond B-9 doc ~ I Protect No SUBTT17651 Comoletion Date R. General Requirements and Approvals • 7 Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline,'Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or pnor to building permit Issuance if no map is involved 2 Anon-retundable deposit shall be paid to the Clty, covering the estimated operating costs for alt new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to liulldin~ permd issuance rf no map is involved 3 Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans, shall be cdmpleted beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map ' 4 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees,shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit Is fully refundable rf at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriatQ documentation Is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submittedto the Engineering Department when the first budding permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT; (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED . C-87 ~0 _/~- i -/-J- , ~~- f _/-J I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res 8 Stf Rpt\SUBII'7651 StdCond 8-9 doc I'~ Ica°~p~^~o,. @p S ~i1, C,y ~~ FIRE Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Dis#rict ' Fire Construction Services ' , STANDARD CONDITIONS November 21, 2005 TAVA Development Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17651 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply , . 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design gwdelines for the spacing and ' location of fire hydrants. ~~~ a For single-family residential protects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area, the maximum distance between fire hydrants is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, • the distance shall not exceed 150-feet b Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: i The entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways. u. Intersections. ui The right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. ' iv As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. v A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any bwlding c If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fire flow shall be provided d Provide one fve hydrant for each 1000 GPM of required fire flow or fraction thereof. • C-88 FSC-2 Fire Flow . 1 The regwred fire flow for this protect is 2,250 gallons per minute at a minimum residNal,pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances For structures in excess of 3,600 square feet use CFC Table A-III-A-1 2 Public fue hydrants located within a 500-foot radds of the proposed pFolect may be use'tJ to prowde the regwred fire flow subject to Fire District~review and approval Private fue hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to prowde required fire flow ,, Fire service plans are regwred for all protects that must extend the e~fisting water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until fire service plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for rewew, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, speafications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. , FSC-4 Requirement for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in: , Buildings constructed in the designed Hazardous Fire Areas in accordance to the approved alternative method #06016 FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access - Fue Lanes Standard 9-7 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimu included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approva FSC-7 Hazardous Fire Area identify the fire lanes A site plan m Fire District standards shall be This protect is located within the "State Responsibility Area" (SRA), the "Very High Fire Hazard Seventy Zone" (VHFHSZ), City of Rancho Cucamonga 'Hillside District ,and/or within the area identified on the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, Exhibit V-7 as High Probability-High Conseouence for Fire Risk. These locations have been determined to be within the "Hazardous Fire Area" as defined by the Fire • District The Hazardous Fire Area is based on maps produced by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and the City of Rancho Cucamonga C-89 1. Hazard Reduction Plans Thp applicant shall prepare~the architectural plan's for the construction of the buildings in accordance with the County of San B'ernardino's' Development Code as amended by RCFPD Ordinance 39, AppAndix II-A Fire Area FS-3 regwrerhents apply to the • construction of the buildings based on the slope of the terrain and/or mitigation of the fuel modification plans The development code provides Standards regulating and regwring ~ , a. Fire resistive roof assemblies , b. Fuel Modification and hazard reduction plans c. Fire Distract access roadways ~' ~ ,~ d Fire resistive constructon and protection of openings ' e. Fire sprinkler systems , f. Fire flow crdena ~'~ ' For construction requirements in the "Hazard Fire Area" refer to the following web site http•//www co sari-Bernardino ca us/landuseservices/DevCod_e (Chapter 2 Hazard Protectioh, ~' Article 2 Fire Safety (FS) Overlay District) for an Adobe copy , ~~ FSC-S Chronological summary of RCFPD Hazardous Fire Area requirements ~,, Prior to the issuance of a rough grading permit, the applicpnt shall obtain the Fire Distract approval of a preliminary fuel modification/hazard reduction plan and program. The plan(s) shall be prepared by an individual or firm qualified and experienced in wddfire~hazard mtigaton planning Prior to the issuance of a budding permit, the developer shall have submitted and obtain approval of a • final fuel modification plan Further, the budder shall have completed that portion of the approved fuel modification/hazard reduction plan determined to be necess$ry by the Fire District before the introduction , of any combustible materials into the protect area Approval is subject to an on-site inspection Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the remainder of the fuel modification/hazard reduction plan regwrements shall be installed, inspected and accepted by the 'Fire Distract staff Schedule the inspection with Fire Construction Services at 909-477-2713 FSG13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal have approve a request for alternate method, as submitted. Please comply with the conditions of the approved alternative method #06016 for AFS and vegetation management Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following ,prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distract Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply C-90 system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-8. The Budding 8 Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. • ~ All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a,Qlan Showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distract and CCWD. On,the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foq>; radius of the protect. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delvering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installatidn and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Fuel Modification Plans Please refer to RCFPD Summary of Fire Hazardous Area requi~~ments. 4 Construction Access. The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 5 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction ' Services PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER • The budding construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers• All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga '~ Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on- site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the regwred fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4 Fire Access Roadways Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access . roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services C-91 4 The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with prowsioris that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies wholes responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all regwred fire access roadways • ~ I 5. Address Pnor to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When bwlding setback from the public roadway excgeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry ~ ; ' 6.. Fuel Modification PleasA refer to RCFPD Summary of'Fire Hazardous Area requirements , i 7. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete dhe Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject bwldmg or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Sernces Inspector , S. Mapping Site Plan Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'Iz" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector • C-92 • 5 I 1 ~I I' Staff Report DATE' August 9, 2006 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Donald Granger, Assoaate Planner , SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17594 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to subdivide 8.21 acres of land into six parcels for commercial purposes in the" Cofimunity Commeraal District (Subarea 4) within the Foothill Boulevard Districts, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue -APN. 0227-i52-18 and 31. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2004-00874, Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365, General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01000, Development District Amendment DRC2005-01002, Development Code Amendment DRC2005-01003, General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006 and Variance DRC2005-01124 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration ~ ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-00365 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -The development of a Master Plan for an office and commercial center consisting of a 112 room hotel, two restaurant pad buildings totaling 10,893 square feet, atwo-story office and retail building totaling 46,000 square feet, a bank and office building totaling 6,583 square feet, and a gas station with convenience store and food court totaling 8,189 square feet on 821 acres of land in the Community Commercial District (Subarea 4) within the Foothill Boulevard Districts, located at the northeast corner of Fcothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue -APN. 0227-152-18 and 31. Related Files Preliminary Review DRC2004-00874, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17594, General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01000, Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-01002, Development Code Amendment DRC2005-01003, General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006 and Variance DRC2005-01124 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2005-01124 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to allow a maximum building height of 54 feet where a maximum bwldmg height of 45 feet is allowed for the development of a master plan for an office and commercial center consisting of a 112 room hotel, two restaurant pad bwldings totaling 10,893 square feet, atwo-story office and retail building totaling 46,000 square feet, a bank and office bwldmg totaling 6,583 square feet and a gas station with convenience store and food court totaling 8,189 square feet on 8 21 acres of land m the Community Commercial Distract (Subarea 4) within the Foothill Boulevard Districts, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue -APN 0227-152-18 and 31. Related Files' Preliminary Review DRC2004-00874, ITEM D, E, & F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 Page 2 Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17594, Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365, General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01000, Development D~stnct Amendment DRCZ005-01002, Development Code Amendment DRC2005-01003, and General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration '' PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surroundma Land Use and Zoning: ~ ' North -Single-Family Homes, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South -Vacant Land and Aggazzotti Home and former Winery Site; Industrial Park East -Open Space and Edison Transmission Towers; Open Space West -Spaghetti Factory Restaurant, Home Depot, and Retail Uses; Community Commeraal B General Plan Designations Protect Site -Office North -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South -General Commercal East -Flood ControUUtdity Corridor West ~ -Community Commercial ' C Site Characteristics The vacant site is rectangular m shape and has sparse vegetation and weeds covering the mafority of the site The site has evidence of discing for weed abatement purposes. D Parking Calculations Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Regwred Provided Office/Bank 29,583 1/250 118 Retail 23,000 1/250 92 Restaurant A 4,277 1/100 for first 6,000 square 43 feet, then 1/55 square feet thereafter Restaurant B 6,616 1/100 for first 6,000 square 71 feet, then 1/55 square feet thereafter Convenience 4,489 1/250 square feet 18 Store Fast-food 3,700 1/75 square feet 49 Hotel 112 Rooms 1 per room plus 2 per 117 resident manager Totals 508 464" The applicant is requesting a reduction m the amount of regwred parking through shared parking See parking analysis discussion below D, E, & F-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ' SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01 1 24 - CHAfiLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 . Page 3 , E Parking Analysis The applibant is requesting a reduction in the amount of regwred parkiftg based upon a Shared parking analysis study Staff supports the parking analysis and the use of shared parking for the proposed mix of office, hotel, retail and restaurant uses. The shared parking analysis for the protect site is based on the premisd of off-set peak demand The Planning Corhmission has approved shared parking in several protects, such as Virginia Dare Business Center and, most recently„ Haven Park at the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and 4th Street Charles Joseph Assoaates (CJA) prepared a shared parking analysis of the mixed use protect site consisting of a hotel, two restaurant pad buildings, atwo-story office and retail building, a bank, an office building, and a gas station with convenience store and food court, and concluded that the site presents an opportunity for shared parking Shared-use parking studies are based on industry research regarding parking generation rates and'uUhzation patterns Research organizations such as the Urban Land Institute (ULI) and the Institute for Transportation Engineers (ITE) have conducted extensive research to determine peak hour parking demand. The Planning staff evaluated the shared parking analysis by CJA and compared data from a parking study prepared by Walker Parking Consultants (WPC) m 2b05 for Haven Park, which is a similar protect that consisted of a hotel, two office buildings, a restaurant, and two pad commercial buildings WPC has extensive experience in parking analysis and shared parking, and had partiapated m the recent update of the ULI landmark study of mix~;d-use developments . F The shared parking analysis for the protect site by CJA is based on research that certain protects can effectively share a pool of parking because of two primary phenomena that occur in mixed uses. 1) Off-set peak hour parking demands that occur between certain uses, and 2) A certain percentage of vehicles will utilize more than one use on the protect, and are classified as "captive " Offset peak hour relationships occur when two or more uses, such as an office having peak hour parking demands between the hours of 8 00 a m and 5 00 p m. and a steakhouse that is open after 5:00 p m ,are able to utilize a significant amount of parking stalls from the same parking pool Land uses with offset peak hour parking demands can mutually benefit from the same parking pool because of a phenomenon known as static net parking demand Static net parking demand is defined as the actual parking demand of a specific use at a specified time. For example, a steakhouse that is open for dinner only will have a static net parking demand of 0 between the hours of 8 00 a m and 5 00 p m As such, stalls that would be allocated for a steakhbuse under traditional parking count calculations can be utilized by a daytime use, such as office Research studies indicate that mixed uses can effectively share a pool of parking because of offset peak hour parking demands, and that actual parking demand can be reduced because some customers will already be present or "captive" for existing uses (i a office worker who walks to the on-site restaurant for lunch) Vehicles that are coming from off-site and create a parking demand are referred to as "non-captive." Thus, the actual parking demand is not the simple sum of all proposed uses, but a calculated demand based upon peak hour use, non-captive, and captive ratios Since the protect consists of 29,600-square feet of office, 23,000-square feet of retail, and a 112-room hotel, the likelihood of captive use among the proposed mixed-use protect is moderate to significant As noted above, WPC has extensive experience with shared parking analysis On a . previous analysis done by WPC for a protect that had a similar land use composition, a 25 percent captive ratio for retail and sit-down dining, and a 35 percent captive ratio for fast-food was utilized For this protect, based upon the proposed square footages of retail and office use, Staff utilized a more conservative 10 percent captive ratio for retail and sit-down dining, and fast-food use All uses were calculated with 100 percent occupancy assumption Based upon pnor parking studies and the proposed land use composition, the peak hour parking demand for all land uses will be in D, E, & F-3 1~` PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01 1 24 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES , August 9, 2006 Page 4 , the early afternoon (1 00 p m to 3 00 p m) Durng the early afternoon, the office and retail uses will be at peak use, and the sit-down restaurant, although not in {leak use, will still be generating a significant amount of cars The applicant is requesting a reduction of 42 parking stalls or an 8 percent reduction of the Development Code requirement of 508 stalls to 464: The 508-stall figure is ,based upon a traditional parking calculation, adding up the total amount of required parking based upon each type of land use using the City's Development Code parking stall ratios During the ea{ly afternoon peak hour parking demand, Planning staff calculates that the total amount of regwred shared parking will be 453 stalls The 453-stall count includes a conservative cushion of ~15 percent. The protect proposes 464 stalls, which is 11 stalls greater than the 453 peak hour stall requirement Some parking studies cite that the real estate standard for occupancy rates is actually 95 percent (100 percent occupanc~l was utilized for the proposed protect). If the 95 percent occupancy rate is factored into the shared parking analysis, the protect will have additional available stalls as the amount of required parking drops based upon the real estate industry standard of a 5 percent vacancy rate Further, as the City continues, to develop, more restaurants and retail services are constructed. The non-captive ratios should fall, thereby adding more stalls to the protected 11 stall surplus. ~ ~ , ANALYSIS General The proposed protect, with its mix of hotel, office, retail, and restaurants, will have an exciting synergy consistent with the intent of the activity center designation The signalized intersection will provide a median break on Foothill Boulevard and coordinated apcess between the proposed protect and future development at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue. ~ The northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue is identified as an activity center, which regwres enhanced paving, plaza areas, and Route 66 icons The applicant has designed the gas station and convenience store to include a plaza with decorative hardscape, multiple wood trellis structures, and a Route 66 icon located in the rotunda The protect includes a Route 66 themed-water feature with a wood overhead trellis to be located between two restaurants with visibility from Foothill Boulevard Consistent with the Foothill Boulevard architectural concepts, all six buildings have made efforts to mimic winery-inspired buldings, making use of wood rafters, wood trellis features, stacked stone, and tower elements In order to be sensitive to the existing single-family neighborhood to the north, the protect utilizes several site planning techrnques that will minimize the impact of the proposed protect A 15-foot deep landscape buffer is located along the north property line with an 8-foot high wall at the top of the slope in order to provide adequate privacy and sound attenuation The protect has been designed with office uses plotted closest to the residential uses, thereby providing an additional buffer with a use that has hours of operation that will not negatively impact the single-family dwelling units north of the pro)ect site The four-story hotel bwlding has been oriented on a north to south axis so that no guest rooms face the single-family dwellings to the north All buildings that are closest to the residential neighborhood have extra deep setbacks in order to provide the maximum amount of buffering A Parcel Mag Concurrent with the Development Review application is Tentatroe Parcel Map SUBTPM17594 The applicant is proposing to subdivide the protect site into six parcels, ranging in size from 82 acre to 2 29 acres of land The minimum developable area is five acres, which the site area meets at 8 21 acres The minimum parcel size within the Community Commeraal District D, E, & F-4 I ~`~5 I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 , Page 5 , is five acres, however, parcels created within shopping centers are exempt from these st~aridards, as long as a Conceptual Development Plan for the entire denter has been developed and appropriate easements for reciprocal access, parking, and maintenance are provided Staff supports the proposed parcel layout and sizes since the overall protect design is master-planned '~ The Engineering Department has included a condition of approval requiring reciprocal parking and ~ ~ access and toint maintenance of common drive aisles. ~ , B. Minor Exception The Planning Director previously approved a Minor Exception (DRC2006-00010) to allow an 8-foot perimeter wall along the north property line and a portion of the east property Une` The applicant submitted the request for a Minor Exception because of a grade differential between the protect and the single-family neighborhood north of the protect Granting the (yhnor Exception will promote the public safety and welfare by allowing the construction of a wall height that is necessary to provide art adequate level of privat;y, sound attenuation, glare shielding, and public and private safety between the existing single-family dwelling units located north of the proposed protect. C. Variance. The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow a maximum budding height of 54 feet where,a maximum building height of 45 feet is allowed: The Variance is necessary to allow an ultimate tower height of 48 feet for the two-story office building and 54 feet for a primary tower element at the hotel building In compliance with development, the office budding has been designed with a roofline no higher than 25 feet within 100 feet of the residential neighborhood to • the north The primary second-story tower element, at over 100 feet from the residential neighborhood to the north, is 48 feet in height The hotel has been designed with the roofline of the fourth-story at 40 feet, ahd the primary tower on the south elevation at Foothill Boulevard being 54 feet high '~ FACTS FOR FINDINGS The purpose of a Variance is to provide flexibility from the strict application of development standards In order to grant a request for a Variance, the Planning Commission must make a series of findings Generally, these findings focus on unique or special circumstances applicable to a specific property Following are facts to support the necessary findings Findinc 1 The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations, would result in practical, difficulty, or unnecessary physical hardship. This is inconsistent with the obtectives of this Code , FacUs Literal enforcement of the budding setback would cause a physical hardship and practical difficultly for development of the property by requinng the tower elements in the office bwiding and the roofline and tower elements in the hotel to be reduced in order to meet the 45 foot height limitation The Development Code encourages architectural features and rooflines that create visual interest when the design of these features will not negatively impact adtacent properties The hotel bulding has been designed to be sensitive to the adtacent residential neighborhood by utilizing a floor plan that is oriented on a north to south axis so that no guest rooms face the single-family dwellings to the north Further, as required by the Development Code, the two-story office bulding has been designed with a roofline that is limited to 25 feet within 100 feet of the residential neighborhood to the north • Findin 2 P oPetrtY mvolvedxorPheninltended use of thecproperty that do not alpply gene) ally t tother properties in the same zone D, E, & F-5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 ' ~ • -Page 6 FacUs 'There are exceptional circumstances applicable to the subject property that do not apply to a ' majority of other properties in the immediate surrounding area, because of the fact that the project has been designed to be graded approximately 5 feet below the existing grade elevations of the neighborhood north of the project site With the factoring of the 5-foot grade differential, the net budding height results in the office budding, havng a height of 43 feet and the hotel building having a height of 49 feet when compared to the average house pad elevations of the neighborhood to the north Finding 3 That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprave the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone FacUs Literal enforcement of the building setback would deprive the applicant of development enjoyed by other properties in the same zone by requiring the applicant to redesign and lower the architectural focal points that provde visual interest and are customary to winery-inspired architecture, which is contradictory to design guidelines the Foothill Boulevard District's that encqurage multi-planed, pitched roofs, and towers as focal elements. Findinp 4: The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of a speaal privilege inconsistent wdh ' the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. , FacUs The granting of the Variance will not constitute a speaal privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone because there are unique site conditions (i e , grade differential between the proposed project and the existing neighborhood to the north) Further, the architectural design of the project employs good use of towers and multi-planed roofs, which is an architectural design goal of the Foothill Boulevard Distracts Finding 5. The granting of the Vanance, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vanity. FacUs Granting of the Variance for a parking setback will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare since the master planned project has been designed utilizing site planning techniques that take into account building massing, orientation, placement and landscape buffering The office building has been designed with a roofline that is stepped back from the residences, the hotel budding has been designed with a floor plan that is oriented on a north to south axis so that no guest rooms face the single-family dwellings to the north, and there is a 15-foot wide landscape planter and an 8-foot high perimeter wall along the north property line that will provide buffering These site plan design features will ensure that the public health, safety, and welfare of the adjacent single-family neighborhood will not be negatively impacted D Design Revew Committee The project was reviewed on June 6, 2006, by the Design Review Committee At the meeting, the architect presented revised drawings and an oral presentation that outlined responses to all of the primary issues identified in the Design Review Comments The Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Coleman) reviewed the revised drawings and recommended approval, subject to staff level review of architectural revisions and landscape conditions as indicated by the Committee The final colored renderings and Landscape Plan will be available at . the Planning Commission hearing for Commission review The Committee's conditions and revisions have been included as conditions of approval in the attached Resolution of Approval D, E, & F-6 n ~~' ~i~ ' 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT " SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 - CHARLI=$ JOSEPFi~ASSOCIATES • August 9, 2006 „ Page 7 ,, ,~ E Grading Review Committee The protect was reviewed by the Grading Comrr4ittee on May 16, 2006 The Committee recommended approval " F. Technical Review Committee The Technical Rewew~~ Committee reviewed the protect on "~ y May 16, 2006, and recommended approval subtect to the Standard Conditions outlined in the attached Resolutions of Approval G Environmental Assessment Senate Bill 18 took effect on Jariuary 1, 2005, which requires local government to notify Indian Tribes prior to the adoption or amendment of a General Plan fled on of after March 1, 2005, in order to permit tubes the opportunity to consult with local government for' the purposes of protecting and mitigation impacts to cultural places In compliance yvith SB18, staff sent correspondence to the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) requesting a list'of ' tubes to contact The City reviewed a list of 13 tribes to contact from the NAHC S618 specifically states that contacted tribes have 90 days to indicates whether or not they want to consult. Staff did not receive any letters from' the t,tlbes specifically requesting consultation dunng the 90-day nonce period (April 12, 2006, to July 12, 2006) for the purposes of protecting, preserving, or mitigating impacts W cultural places Staff did receive crib letter from the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians requesting 1) That the City consult with other Native American tribes, and 2) Copies of cultural resource documentation In response 1!o the letter from the Soboba Indians, staff contacted a total of 26 different tribal contacts or agents for tubes Staff contacted the archaeologist at the • San Bernardino County Museum to conduct a records search to determine if there are any known archaeological, historical; or cultural resources at the protect location Staff received a response letter (Exhibit K) from Robin Laska, Archaeologist at the San Bernardino County Museum, stating that a database search did not result in any previously inventoried prehistoric archaeological cultural resources The letter indicates that occurrence potential for historic, prehistoric, and prehistoric archaeological resources is low, moderate, and high, respectively Mitigation measures have been included that require that should any prehistoric archaeological resources be encountered before or dunng grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, and to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study Additional mitigation measures require the preparation of a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area The completed report with original tllustrations, shall be submitted to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. SB18 additionally requires a 45-day notification to all tubes of a proposed action on a General Plan adoption or amendment. During the 45-day notification period until the Staff Report deadline, staff did not receive any comments from the notified tribes An oral update will be provided at the Planning Commission hearing Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the protect Part I of the Initial Study was completed by the applicant City staff completed Part II of the environmental Checklist Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to aesthetics, agricultural resources, cultural resources, hydrology and water quality, noise, air quality, geology and soils, population and housing, and • transportation and traffic, there would be no substantial evidence that the protect would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration A Mitigation Monitoring ~~E~~ -~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 '• ~' • Page 8 Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation megsures for the protect ~ '~ NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The applicant went door-to-door in the residential .neighborhood to explain their prolect and obtain input On January 3, 2006, a ~meighborhood meeting was also held to discuss the proposed protect at the Best Western Hotel at 8179 Spruce Avenue. Approximately 15 residents from the residential development to the north attended the meeting. The residents had questions about the type of uses that would occupy the bwldings, privacy issues between the rear yards and the proposed protect, and whether or not the prolect would have dnve-thrus. The applicant explained m detail the size and scope of the prolect and indicated that the height of the hotel would be mitigated'by the 100-foot plus setback The applicant also noted that the hotel has been plotted on a north-south axis so that none of the rooms will have a direct view into the rear yards or homes located directly to the north. The applicant also explained that an 8-foot high wall with an adfacent 15-foot wide landscape planter would be constructed along the north property line The applicant's civil engineer explained that the neighborhood to the north is at a higher elevation than the proposed protect, and that the lower elevation of the prolect would provide further protection from glare generated from light poles. The residents indicated general support of the proposed protect, however, they expressed concern overall of th'e additional traffic the development would bang and the potential for dnvers to try to find a short-cut through their neighborhood The residents requested to have speed bumps installed on Chervil Street as a precautionary measure in order to reduce the possibility of speed violations The applicant indicated that the residents should contact the City's Traffic Engineenng Department regarding . the installation of traffic calming devices CORRESPONDENCE waslpost dsandvnoncesawerepmailed toral9property ownerslwrthDaa 600lfoot newspaper, the property radius of the protect sde RELATED LEGISLATIVE CASES On April 12, 2006, the Planning Commission recommended approval to the City Councl of General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01000 (median break), General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006 (change land use to Community Commercial), Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-01002 (change land use to Community Commeraal), and Development Code Amendment DRC2005-01003 (to allow hotels) through the adoption of four corresponding Resolutions. Those four legislative items have been scheduled for City Council review and action on August 16, 2006 Protect approval is contingent upon approval of all four legislative applications. C~ D,e, 4 F-~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ' SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 Page 9 ' ~ • RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17594, Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365, and Variance DRC2005-01124 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with conditions Respectfully submitted, '~'~~J~ ' ~~!" -- 0 James R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT DG/ric Attachments Exhibd A - Location Map ~ , Exhibit B - Site Utilization Map Exhibd C - Sde Plan Exhibit D - Grading Plan Exhibit E ~- Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17594 , Exhibit F - Floor Plans, Roof Plans and Building Elevations Exhibit G - Site Sections Exhibit H - Architectural Details • Exhibit I - Landscape Plan Exhibit J - Design Review Action Comments dated June 6, 2006 Exhibit K - Historical Resources Review, dated June 15, 2006, from Rohm Laska, Archaeologist at San Bernardino County Museum Exhibit L - Parking Study dated February 8, 2006, by Charles Joseph Associates Exhibit M - Neighborhood Meeting Summary by Charles Joseph Assocates Exhibit N - Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan Details Exhibit O - Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17594 Draft Resolution'of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365 Draft'Resolution of Approval for Varance DRC2005-01124 7,E,r -~ ` W / Y' ~JII i~~ o °~ ~~ ~~i~-- t ~+ ~?a q ,...c0 ~~~7~Q~, _ iosrma un ~~6~ aP~ a e J~ l 1. I~ I~ ,, W Z J ~IGY wG+ 4~ - ~g ~~~~~ SECTION r,~',t I` v.W, w !T YtmM00 SIaNP oR Bplw. ~ Q ' i'~ 4 il] 3 !li ~= ~'~ .. i 5 i ~ Y -~ ~ 0]/49/06 - 1.J4-0 Y 5 e+.a A1002 - CON~IHIH MAWN0.Y ~~an0o mots ~ - ~ i -- • BB WALL ELEVATION - I I • ~, ~ ~ ( I I ~ I ~ ~ ~i, B t ~ I I I O / ~ ~ I I I ' 6 W N x V ~ o 9 0 In a 1 ~ i ~ 0 ? N05103 tlINa03 1NJ Na3HN05 o I 3Na0 5 A 9 N 9 1 " § 'G_ 4 9 q g ~ § w c § § I ^ g i § 9 r^ a 3 9 9 "y 9 z § ° g 3 5' "' p 9 g g e g 9 0 ¢ 9 p § § 0 4 § W ~ p § e • § § ~ (/7 g ~ g § - - 9 ~ - 9 3- a g ' ~ 9 9 4 § § § § ~g • ~__ § _ -_ - 133aL4~ = r § I` . S q § § § § a § § § § 30N3Atl a3153N90a , . ~ -1 I a. ' U ~ O 1 / ` ~ u~ ~ ~9 9 ~ `f u ~~-Z - ~X~~T $ ~ ~~~ fi " 1 \ r I ~ ~~ e s i m. a m ~ w z z y o ~ F ~s - {Qq[ J V' F a „ 0 u f ~.^~~ I~ Q 7 ~ - § S a 0 LL ~ ~ O @g6 6 U F ~ ~9 Ifi fi gfi I ' § § 4 I I I I I n I g I ^ I § I I I I t I § I § ! 1 I F I I ~ s ! i § c ' I fi s I ~ § 5 g 5 3 ~4~6: •ACp o ~ O ee11 a I 3Naa istlrv ~; - III I YMIpyN~wlvlKm ~ = "~^_•- _ ~ ~~ "~J g ' o Q , lar®Lrniw~w~wu~v. _z__~ aaM~ ~ __ tll i ~ i i I 7 - - _ i~ ~ Y00/NNOJ NOSIQi ---_-_ ~y _ / F ~~- •®~ I ~ i I y p f~ ,y ~lw g £ ..,1 I ~~ p -_ ~ ! ,1 ! 6 E . yL-.ll Y O ~ • I I ~ i o ® ~ I U a--~ tl P n I 1 ~ I I I ~ ~ 1~ I ' I >ol o~ ~~~~ 11 I i Q}I 73NN~.~ I ~ I ~ 2 - ~• il' e I a~ ~, j I ~ . I I ~ 9 ~ ~ ~~ _ e~ I I ,I F z t $ N o 0 0 0 ~ ~ I (I I~ ~ I > I~ r o -- - S F 1 ~ ~I m`o: Flu ~ ' o o'~ i O f I F ~ I e 4 ; r O S 5 ~ ~~o i Z ~a ~ I ~O ' - e• mw s~.~um.r _ _~~____ ____r _R~ ~__ --~_ ______ 1 -__ ~.~- 9 __- J -_ - 6 Y - -- __~-~ I I- ? 6 C illlllllll111 f -- -- I ~~ * \ i5 I ~~ - I f ~~ ~ Bis/t I 9'-0 9'-0' 9-0' 9'-0' I I ~ ~ ~~ 1///;~~~ ii i i ~Y . s4a ~~~ 1 ~ rs'4 Bs' ,NII ~° I I P \ \ - 9 ~ I ;"~ TOP 0 c 5\`~ \`_- - ~ \~~ 1 ~ 4 Once mte v~~~ay controG are esta6luRed S}~rp~ y ~ I I ~e 0 ~ vnll FrovWe dliv6hone Jor Eabw oanopy `,/ q `~ \ ~` I I y I _ 7/a- hquuia to flow onto or oJJ of concrete Jwt,.ng al I \ ~n . ~ q b ! ~i ! ~ ~ ~ BT ~ ° J b8~ I l I Itlbr ,' ;, ®~ t ~ t ~ t ° t ° t , ~ ~ ' . ~'•'I,jl~~ ICI ~ ~ I~ i C/ ~ ~ ii ! o I ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ hCtl!lil tl ~NI b' IB'-0' 26 9'-0' ' 21-8' I'-8' 7'-D' -0 I -0' IB'-0 'n ~ 1 ~ S I l - i" Tl it '~ FOOD \ - ' ~ a ° a ~ I 4 _ Q: at' ~ Ig (3,70 ----- 1 - ~ ~ i ! ! O ~ ~~ ~ ~li I I ~ (47 ARKING - 7 r ~ ~- t t II d I © sr - G! a M ------i _- t _ _ - - - II e I ~ ~ i 11'- ' 13'-l' 9 0 I I I• \•r - - tt tii ;Ft Fi I ~ I t. (~ ~-----------~ t ~ ; -~ CONVENIENCE P7 t. _ I I J N e'... ~7 ----', STORE ~o o m a ~ ~ i ii ~-----~ :,. I r.•.•. ~ - - - - , 1 ~ e. •.•. ® I ~ - I T2 ... ~~ . \\ a ~~ .'.. ___ ___ _____ ~ I \ Q \ `~ - tee. ~ t io-o- ~~ - • 5 ~ ` _ e e~W '- _ _ AC~TIV(f_Y CEWTER \ 2 TYP ~o o _ ~~ ~ - nw os i _-_ II I ~ li C H E R V I L S T R E E T ~ \~ J~_ / ~~ ~ ~ w .~ I I ~ ~' ~ I ~' ~ ,IIIIIiflll#is tl~!~ ~-~o Iltt I' ~Itt}~; I+~-I, ,t~+II II 1 ~ I ~~. ~-~ - I _ I~1 I ,. ~~~ ,I '~JI~1, ~ e4 ~ I .±°''°~ I .,, I , ~ - - --~ Iltliu -_ _ ~ r\\ - -.-- ~ tn~ ~ -- F 0 0 H I L L B O U L E V A D j - - . ,-_,,.t ~ -p-Q-_ -_ -- ~^^^~~^ ~ AsaoUeted Engineers Inc m~~o9- ~~~ - - CIT/ OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~., CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN ~~ FlOO e o ~^ ~~ aeivunaA ~ m. i..i..>~m ... j.al ..~-a.~ VICTORIA GARDEN BUSINESS PARK RD-2!W -nom ~ ~ - -_ -~ _ s -_ • • I I '!~ k y i~~xl g Y ~ ag c~ 2 H i i u ~ ~ 2 ii ' Y ~ J Q .a ~~ ~ s w8 zs ei ° e s g g '~ O =~ =~ 9i +e li { U 93 z `~ T • ]i ° ~ ~, p B si e ~~ F ,~Jfi~ ° ~ ~i ~ p7 ii ~Ei a ~ ~ ~ ~~~ p ~ y ee a r ~ ° ~ ~~ SS ia£ Y ~a ~ ~ gg U !e ~' 4i A ,£ ! !g. age LL p 55 o c cc A p!e a ~ ~ 9 ~- I y 1 £ ` 9t9 • gi ~i `n llj 9 ~ ° I ~ Ci ~i Bi £^:E~~t • £ I k I • BpGp6 e" £ c ~ ~ k •9 • Q ~ ~ ii : @ SE~~~~z k ~ i ~ ~ l~4lq~i _ _ pp a {{ ii " p Gg gape/. d ~ ~ a a e a~ r ®. c i ~ ~i ~ a~&~- •~ 6~ ~ ,T, ~~II~ ~ 9 z I~ ~ 1~ y 6 :~ ~ I lL~ S M013B 335 3NI1 FYJIYIY 8~ :~ 5 I t 1 MOl3B 335 3N0 HO1YY1 e gp -~ I R ~ ~~ i ~ 2 o ~ di E : ~ ri ~ re~ I~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~e ~ ~a ~ v tli g a° ~ ~ =~ 44. g~ N~ 2 I i I r i :~~~~~ I i I I 1 - 110BY 335 3N11 I GAR +-`-".' • 'D Z Y4 9 Ol N t y ~~} d a @~/ a I a~ I di ~ U• a Z y ~ O i ~ ~~ m ~ w ~~ S U~ OS ~~ U e .$ s~ e ~b~ ~8 @ # a ~? ~ a~ ~~ w `P w k" ¢ I Z O¢i ~ U~ N U S U LL Q ~ ~ S Y~~ t~: 3AOAtl 335 3NI1 FgIY% - ~ - ROCNESTER BOULEVARD ~^~ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP No. 17594 I PORTIONS OF LOTS S AND 9 TRACT NO 7290 IN THE CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN SERNAROINO, STATE OF CALIFORNN, AS _ RECORDED IN BOOK 92 PAGES 22 AND 23, OF MAPS,_IN THE OFFICE OF SAN .--O-v..~=.• •• • BERNARDINO COUNTY ' SECTION A-A N CAAPH C SCALC FOOTNRL BOULEVARD u ///` SECTION B-B NOT t0 SCALE nn or RA~dO ~- I~ ~'~ ti ~r'vTi s ~ Eft-- ------ ----- ---~ ~ II ' om~lo uAP i - D \ L- _ WATER SEM9CE I \ J / O ~ I r \ SEWER SERNCE U ~ ~' I ~ ~ ~' ~ I I l l I xATUau wssERVrcE ..R..` r.. „e m2na Dear J W I I I I I FlRE PRaTECTIw ~• IM9 USE OESKLVAIIQV "~ W I fiP - ~ - [ecnc DESCa~aTroR r.. II I .. w.w«. 1 ~ ¢ - a ~ ~ _ n ~_ I ~ ~ 1 I _~ - w ~.eeE°^°n°: r.°... w,:~.o'.°w..~ w" :~M a°.r. o..~.vA. n..a~... ~c~a,":mm,.rm~a...a... p y CS ~ oso,mr.,...®..... W~ ? ~ ~ E ~ i \\\\\ µ ASSES50.QSPARCE[SAUMBER mxx-~sx-~e -ir ~ I I • ` v rr no mn .c %urx w• Smuw.*a m _ _ - _ - _ t R\\\\\ oW+cR 2 ~ vMCEl3 C \ \ ` _ ~ E \ ~ \ ExcWEER ~ _ \\ - ~ PNR~En3 a ~ \ _ nnS e pR[pnR(o I R uv rn~ L W C~E, p t ~~ I p PARS 3 3 I I dCU /~ _ i \ '\PT ~ CptO EASEMERxS wPn..omrA,w F 0 0 HILL B O U L`E V A R D ~',.°~ °~'~°""`~~`""~°P° .. PRONSED EASEAIERIS ......,,'...„... ....,ov.Q ' _ ....o...,. ~ , uaAwrA.Rn pQg_i w@~ _ ~~~ - «[~~ ~` s~~ C ~ OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA axmnmiss AssodatatlMEnDln~rs Inc _ ~n2. 8 _ R ~,;.o- „ ;.,., «~_,„ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 17594 ~2eoo m.:u\'r m~.. my ~~~? ~~ %erwRw ~~ VICTORIA GARDEN BUSINESS PACK c o< o- -rl o- lJ _~ Tl o- 4 Q _u_r~ TORY QQ-ICOURT ILA-W1'0 S~ Ud ROTANDA b Y4 --o --o ~v CONVENIENCE STORE 4,499 SF (90 PARKING ST ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~'li,;~~,II;lI~ ~~I' u~~~l'~I --o a~(~~~lfl li~ ~i~~ d b ~ FOOD OOIIIR FpOF PUN _ _ Q + ~~r _, ~•-moo "- - 0 i!] _ _ ~ ,!~ ~~ ~~e - Q _ - I nir - - _----- _ - _ - ~ '--- - g~ ~ ~_ ~~~ __ -- _ _ '~ ~ 0]/05/06 I/!'~1 -0 b -~_ - _ ena _ A2001 • • - - - • svmocvaoua. w a~+ / nwarra ~~_~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~ o-- ~ ~' ~Ld/ly C 8 $ ~ N ~~~~~ 88. a :Q ~~~ ~~ I~ i ~ ~ i ~ I r ^~o • • -- s ~H V _~ N I aaa~woWiew.~emo I D Im~NUlOV6M1CM~~f ~Y ..~.-. O2 CANOPY ELEVAl1ONS' ~ 4 _ _ - STRUNG ,n,. ~ .,~ ~.. r ~uv~a. u sr~~ CANOPY ELEVATIONS ~rn:ms A2004 - .: ~« - c d ~.,,~ 1O CANOPY PLAN ~' l/ m I x BANK/OFFICE ROOF BANK/OFFICE NORTH ELEVATIO l ~ ~- ~ ~~~~~ 41Ji'~t+`f l~ „'I + ~ +I~I!ii +~~~~ill ~ ~; 7 °'I 1 2 5Zo N a- F 8a ~M J 0 ~~ I J' z~ 'SAY J O T _ • ~~ ~~ O T~ ~~ _ •1~.~ _ B _ a - d W _- Y Q t m Q I p1/rv - ~/o pe0 u 5• A5001 - - ~ - BANKIOFFK;E EAST ELEVATION BANKIOFFICE WEST ELEVATION BANK/OFFICE SOUTH ELEVATION ~,~~ ~,.,~, . .; ! ~ I j ~ i j s il t, j;! I ' I s ~ i i P! ! I ! i i il P l € ~ E ~' a" Q~ W ~° w a g ~o F~ ~~ g ~tl~1 3~e~ ~~l~~~~ ~~~~ -~- rLr F-23 '. ,y, ..,. __ sNOUVna,a ____,_ riv-€a tloo~ - .. ,, ~ ~ uavdnvis~ - - dannr ~ ~! ~ ; IISI ~ S ~ti11 II '~ , O O c a - _ _ s - I .~' I _ o~ I ~ _ - _ _ I - .~ m ____ -s ~ ~ - senmru I Krtcl~r+ _ _ _ _ __ __ -_ I __ I I _ -__ ~~ I -° ~.._ __. ~ tECanaiu,~ svnce - -v "' I' P' {It ~•'I ___. ..N_ L__________ `I'1I IIiII01li•II I;i"pHIII 1111 ~ li~[I~~l~lai~'~ill i ~~ _- _ - o ;1~ - ,ix - a _ _ ~ ~ l~' 7 = "[ o , c RESTAURANT FLOOR N RESTAURANT ROOF PLAN ! o c - 1 - ~ I" - - . e _ ('} - ~, / L,1 4 mwewrraealorwwl A } wr'~om we~e1 e.~ } _ 11031 HUMIVI IYV1111'1 CLCYAINN 1/a• e1 -n- ~ - s ~~ _~~~ - 1 ~~~ u/u/os n/Ix/os 1/16 •1 _ Y 5 ~' llr9 A4002 i- /-~iESTAURANi SOUTH ELEVATION ~,~~„ Mnd~aNV g s ~~, ~ -_ ~~'~ ~' ~, s~v~d dooms aru ~ 8 's : i ~umyw~~uoux _=_~ b'QMI H3"''3' 1V1~3MY°° ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ex~-~r ~-'~ 4 4 ~ ~ ~. ~: ~ ~ b b ~ ~ b b ~,E,~~ 25 I~1`' ~ rr ~ ' .,~...~.~~... ~ tt N 31~.ro ocmu ~3. ~_ ,. ~ $N011Vh313 i t` S Q ITUwf -_--'~ wa-¢m xn -- - - ~../ ^ ~eva~aum~ew vuoux _' _ ~ iV QMl Fl31.N3~ 1V1~13WWOJ I~ 13 ~ i ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~I , i I~ ~ i ~ f' ~;~ i~~&i ~-- E~~4~~l~a~~ , ~~ ~~ 8Y ~F ~~ a ~!~ ~~~ ~-- ~-- ®--- , ,,, ~--- ~;- ~-- o---- ~- o- - o--- o--- o--- o--- o--- o--- o--- o--- E,F- ~~_ f~ A b ~~ ~' ~, • ---- °' Y ~ ~ ~~~ ___ -__---_ _ ~ - - _ .. doom-rr3.-, _ -~• -- OLLV/~,3 03UHV'W ~ 3 i S i~v /TMlOQ1 ~r~; ~.~.~~. -- - - dannr d~o,ur~p3wwo~ c c ~~~~~'~ ~x~~ ~-~o • w<a-ma wv _ _- - P1Vld HOOD 1SklH 3 - ~euso.urnss~wa.>. y~,__ I II • ~~ F-~1 9 n N r 22 21 9 16 IS I] _ 5-~' -e• e- - i N --- --- II II II II II II II II ~'I ~I . SECOND FLOOR PLAN 13,387 SF 1/8"=1'-0" ~/ 'GUEST ROOM 24 ROOMS SUITE 1 SUITE - TOTAL - 25 - ~ 1 I l a s a 2 s s e _ ] z I u- I -o I - - u-x I - ~ I -o u I - u- _ 3 ~ ~ ' ' ' 8 b b _ ® = o ee ~ _ 8 o ® _® uxt b uxrt o uxn o ®sroa z -p ~ ~ ® g ee. - ~ ® ® d~J © Oz z p F' ® - I 10 O ® I rw CMP Mq ® ~ I Iw mxxme Q b a q ® ® pd by ®~i b ® 0 e ~ - ° ® _ _ ~ sliic q,. fl ° ra ., A.. Rn ~ _ _ = V ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~ ,.. I•Ip• 61 LII ~l~i ~~Ibll~~'I, i I~'r~ !p!I!j ~~i ~i~(1~IIli II~ ill Q ' i'! llz 3 11i ~ = "1 Z 8J- = LL _ ~ __ .... oz/a/ae Ve-I-a _ 45 eleB _ A6002 r~ -- -- _ ~} ?( 22 21 19 IB IS IS ~1 5-e ' ~ _ _ _ e _ ~M e uxr r b-- - - o Mlr o 1 W ® b Oe b ~ ® uxr o - v wr o OO f S Y 7 ~ r ® stun THIRD FLOOR PLAN 19,934 SE 1/8"=1'-0" ~/ GUEST ROOM 37 ROOMS SUITE 1 SUITE TOTAL - 38 ~ 0 ~ y~ ® ® ® _ IMT b IM N IM 2 _ a u -e xxr o ~ b ~ 1 M CdM00R ~~ I ~~~~~ I•r I II• I', I.II ~I i;;~lp~ll~yl~ h ;r. ;i9~1~, ~i 51d~lifl,hl ill = Q- d=1 J ~ ' J ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 = ~' ! e E b' ® D ¢y~ VJ LL ~~ ~ , Ol/p/O{ Ve -I -o _ .s un ") 2 21 19 IB 15 IJ 1 1-'ip uxrt o " ® - o R uxrt b r ` ` W b° N b ® wrt o © - 0 WII D 0 E FOURTH FLOOR PLAN ,~ 19,695 SF 1/S"=1'-0" _ ~ 4 GUEST ROOM 34 ROOMS _ SUITE _2 SUITE- ~~~ TOTAL - 36 - 1 ~~~~~ R 10 9 B ) fi 5 . ] 2 L _ 11 -S~ 1 -0 1- 1 I -0 1- 1 1 1 '! © © ~ Q ~ ~ ' J OO OO 09 ' ~ - ~ 1 1 xo x ® e - - R ~ ® ® ® ® uxrt o uxrt o uxrt o 1 6 ® SiOR J J Q .q Y .G V ~ O 10 ' c '• 1 M CORRCCR ® O 1 xR CMRN R , O b n x O ~ ~ © ~ a 9 p® © O ® D _ ~ P ~ - - ® _~ O O _ J - O ~ ®O ®O __ ®O .. IL _ wl ~ o ~ xn ~ __ O O O P F ® ® W ubo• ub-0 ueo ~ -o• -n b -r 1 - u bo• ub ua b 1 b , A 1 ! 1 -°~ - ~ - _ m/o./oR 1)-~• ~ 1/fi -I -o - 5 ~ - 3 2 1 YS - I) tfi la 12 I] 10 9 8 ) 6 -- 01.9 -- 60 ,~~ .,,~ „~,.~,o ~,.,~, ~.A.-~,~ ~~~~ ~ - I I I e el n I I j l j l I I I I I I I I I I -~x~~- ~-~ 6 ~eannr ,, Iii ;~ . ,N, t ~~iii~~, lil iil li; D S '"3~ i. 0 S i ~__ ____ ..~~.~d~ - - __.._,_ ~ ~eaa+-au wn _ _= _ ... ',iNOLLV/3B ~ara~.ui.uew ~uo~a% -- • ~~. r s eomo-morao ~ w ~a ~ varcwlyo woven a+. aiaow ~ ruaoi m.-e-au xn ~~~,~ i -- i~ ' ~~~~~ ~ , =_~ ~eannr ~~ ~~ e 3 ~ ~ 4 ~ ,~ , ~ ~ '' [ ' ;;~-~~. - ~ ~ ~ ~ , ,~ .~ ,, ,~ ,~ ~~ ,r b ~ ~ `~~ o-- 3 ~ ~ ~ I ~- b Ay 3 I~ ' u ~F - 3 (~ ~' ---~~--- M1f11~ 4 t L ~' ~' 6 _~, it ~ I ~ ~ I' ' ~~ ~ ~ ., ~, yl j ' ~ I" i ~ ~ I II 1 i .I ' 1~~ J ., 1 --, r--~1 ~~11 ~, r ~ II ~~ II ~~ II II ' j1~ u ~1 I'I ~ ~~ II II I~ ~~ II ~ ~ ~ i ' ~~ COMMEFI~IAL CENTER JWDA' ~ '. ` ~ ~ :_ A-A SffE SECTION " ~ ., . I I "' 4M -- -~ ~~ ~ 1 ~ -tr~ •l\ r~ .L~.S~'S"~~ i 1 1Y.'IVM NC91fNl1Y ®1161 .mom-cx-sn raonu / wo~161 •~e wac~o wrawrn~ cxraw as rn. • wcmos am+ '~ -= - r;=,"_ s-r„ao gar ~ - ' ~ 8 m n .o-s ~ ~[ ~~ ~* ~~ 9 .L-I .9 .L-.I Y~ !~. iR ~ 4 3= i w ! i _ d ~ n ~ a ~ N ~ ~ _ a d .9 .9 .L•I O m y m , § } i ¢ R i ! ,, : I ~ ~I ! s : : Y i i i ~ i i ~ :~ ~ r & z i ~ R s i r ® = Q °' 31 ~ 3i 3~ t ; ~ ~ T R ,, t _ ! ! ~ .. i ! a s ~ _ ~ ~ ~ a : = i : ~ ~ .. ~~ t J _ ^ i e 1 ! ,~ 0 O - ~; 3= 3: 3 : D,C,F-~3~ ~x~T +~'~ 1~ - ,... 4 • C~ ~N ~t I 1fi11® AllIVIIHTIMCI.M = - , •• ~ I I _ m Q O ry p 1 ~~ • ~a ~ ~ ~~ II ' Z 11 r y 6 I, I, I I ,~ O ~ O d N e x ~§ ~3 ~ S I~ } II I~ ~ ~ II i ~ ~ 11 = I ~ r • I .a zp _ P .E-.E h i c e ~: ' ~: ~+ ~ " ~ ' p 4 Y '~ f ~~ I y' ~ ~ ~ ~ %~ - 111 ~ 4 t i ~ , ~ ~ ~ Yp a M O ~ pt II .~ ~ ! f a ~ 3: ~ 1 m T 3°~ Q 3: - 3 m : 3 - ;- g Er i ~ .L-,b ~ 1 t } Pi 'WNfaw~~9r-F II I~dUf ~E ~ ~H g 7 ~ m ~ o ~ G p~``~ ~'IYjI~~Pl~ ~i(I~ +i ~ ~ - - - ---- 1 ~ i!~ ~~~4i 6 ~, ~ m ~S ~j ~Srer '~' Br - ~ i~e ~: ~ ' ~ 5 i i u ~ ~s 6 ~ 1 ( ~ ~ g ;! i i ~ ~ 3~ ~~ 1 6~ err r li ; rl~;~ ~ ~a~.?= q 1 1 ~ ~ ~r J ii' `1 ) ((r ~ ;lijl ~ 1 ~ ip ~ a ~ ~ ' r' ~ ~ ~ 6 ~ ~~~m~ s ~ y~ _ ~ ~~ U ~ R~ iE ~ ~ s ~,~ _ I i ; ( ~ ~ r ~ 1 ((}} 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ i ; ~ ~ lti; l ~i " ` ~ L4 II ~~ • r ... „ , ... `d4Mf a s: I ?? $ ~ :: ll ~~ R ~~ ~ a ~, ~0 ~~ ~~,~'~T ~-Z ~~ C~ ~yysnm~v~aa __.- ..e.~.^_ ~~ 8 vruarM ivno~m advu -____ ..... -. ~..~ S7VlaO "J611 ., aw ~aHaw/T>•u~ - -- va-m-am wv -~. - .. ,. : 7 a ~ Q ~'"n"~°"„~'~" _~_~ dannr 1 '-. I~I 1 ~ ~ 1 t m rv - ~ I , ~ i ~; ~ ~ ~ a ~ i $, ~ ' , : I ~i ~ B ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i~ r YY a ~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ Y i ~ i ~ 1 ..~.~ a ~~ n n r ~ .. I ;I I' I i ~ ~ t ~~~~l ,. , .. ~, --r; -~, -r ~, ~~ ~- ,. ,. : :: 0 a °~ ~ ~ a _ .. ~ ~~I' 3 ~ ~ _ c ~ ~ ~-~ r _ 4 : 2 F_ . 2 2 ~ ~ .'i I aii u~~ luu ~ -__ .. o } a t ~ o~ ®aas TG I~~T >$ i~I~ i ~l' m = 2 i ~~~-i i I _ YY2 m = r c u l! ~ j~, iz : N ~ ~ y ~sg ~ ~ Yom' a ~ 8 4 Z F 9~e~g ~ deg ~ w ^ ~•~ wo orn Y a ae~x;s S~d?i ~" r o~ ~;€"s= a $$s~3 t d ~ Z N v S o ~ ~ p ppfd ~, Q$4 2~ ~ g a sn$ $~ ep~~ ~~ 3 p88 L 2s ~ l3~4 ~ ~e ~~~ Fiq ~ as,Y @i~~ gE ~~3~n ~sa ~® a g ~~ ? ~~ e @e is ~~ ee ~ ~ ~ y~ g ~ „~~ Lg~ 9€ qq / p ~~~i~~~~~~'~ E~~p~ tl i ~ 7~ ~" g €°°E Y~ YI ~ e~ ~ ~~ ~9 ~~21 ~I ~B ~i ~~ ~ w a i! ~n 'a~ ~$ff y ¢ $ d a f CC YS Y$ a i ~ ~ar, ~« l~~ yy #g {g Sm s° :~ a,~ x r~ ~ O O h ~ e m tt x N 0 Z w w J (7 Z F z JLL a~ ~~$i!~~ ~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~@~~ ~~'~ ~ Y ~~~~~~~ ~~E ~ ~~~~~~~ b § % a ~ S ~ ~~ g g S ~f !i ~ ~ a ~ i ' ~6 Y r' s 9 ~ 2p =$ _ ~6 p ~ ¢$ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ° ~ ~~ 5 i g6 J!i 6g : a f ny~ a .8 R .8 ~~ s~ °°x° 's~ = 0 0 d!c Q w 0 # S ~~~ ~ ~ ~4~8 yg Y Y ~~ ~ ~ eta ~. ~ i~~~ 6$6 I I~~i I i t ioio ppp ~ Y+?~tj94t;~` ~ ~ e E €fi~l4eiieiii ~li1 ~ - 0 0 ~_~,~_ ~, a V • ~~ DESIGN F~EVIEW COMIv~ENTS 8 20 p m Donald Granger ti~~ June 6, 2006 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17594 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES- A request to subdrvide 8 21 acres of land into 6 parcels for Commeraal purposes in thg Community Commeraal Distract (Subarea 4), within the Foothill Boulevard Distracts, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue - APN• 0227-152-18 and 31 Related Files Preliminary Revie~S DRC2004-00874, Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365, General Plan Amendment bRC2005-01000, Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-01002, Development Code Amendment DRC2005-01003, General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006, and Variance DRC2005-0 1 1 24 Staff has prepared ~ Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration i ~, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-00365 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -The development of a' master plan for ~n office and Commeraal center consisting of a 11'2-roor~t hotel, two restaurant pad buildings totaling 10,893 square feet, atwo-story office and retail ~bwlding totaling 46,000 square feet, a bank and office building totaling 6,583 square feet, and a gas statioh with a convenience store and food court totaling 8,189 square feet on 821 acres of land in the Community Commeraal Distract (Subarea 4), within the Foothill Boulevard Distracts, located at the northeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue -APN , 0227-152-18 and 31 Related Files Preliminary Revew DRC2004-00874, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17594, General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01000, Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-01002, Development Code Amendment DRC2005-01'003, General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006 and Variance DRC2005-01124 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration Backoround On May 10, 2006, the Planning staff met with the applicant to discuss the Design Review Committee (DRC) Comments outlined in the May 16, 2006, agenda. At that meeting, the applicant requested cl~nfication on staff's comments and requested feedback on the proposed architectural modifications As a result of that meeting, some of staffs comments outlined in the May 16, 2006, DRC comments have either been modified or omitted The applicant's responses to the remaining issues are indicated at the end of the comments in bold type At the end of the meeting, the applicant requested a time extension in order to allow the protect architect suffiaent time to make revisions and to consult with the Sheraton Hotel representatives At the request of the applicant, the protect was rescheduled for the June 6, 2006, DRC meeting Desion Parameters The proposed protect, with its mix of hotel, office, retail, and restaurants, will have an exerting synergy consistent with the intent of the activity center designation The protect site is located at the northeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard The site is rectangular in shape and is compnsed of two parcels It is vacant with sparse vegetation and weeds covering the matority of the site and has evidence of disang for weed abatement purposes To the north, is asingle-family neighborhood, to the east is an Edison Power Line Corridor, to the south, across Foothill Boulevard, is vacant land and the Aggazzotti home, formerly a winery and designated Historic Point of Interest, and to the west, across Rochester Avenue, are the Spaghetti Factory, Home Depot, and other retail uses A signalized intersection is proposed near the southeast corner of the protect The signalized intersection will provide a median break on Foothill Boulevard and coordinated access between the DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTPM17594 AND DRC2005-00365 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES June 6, 2006 ~ Page 2 proposed project and future development at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue The northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester~Avenue is identified as an,actrvily center and regwfes enhanced paving, plaza areas, and Route 66 icons. The applicant has designed the gas station and convenience store to include~a plaza with decorative hardscape, multiple wood trellis structures, and a Route 66 icon located in thg rotunda The project includes a Route 66 themed-water feature with a wood overhead trellis to be located between two restaurants with visibility from Foothill Boulevard Consistent with the Fopthill Boulevard Architectural Concepts, all six buildings have made efforts to mimic winery-inspired buildings, making use of wood rafters, wood trellis features, stacked stone, and tower elements. , In order to be sensitive to the existing single-family neighborhood to the north, the prolect utilizes several site planning techniques that will minimize the impact of the proposed project A 15-foot deep landscape buffer is located along the north property line with an 8-foot high wall at the top of the slope in order to provide adequate privacy and sound attenuation. The protect has been designed with office uses plotted closest to the residential uses, thereby providing an additional buffer with a use that has hours of operation that will not negatively impact the single-family dwelling units north of the protect site The four-story hotel building has been oriented on a north to south axis so that no guest rooms face the single-family dwellings~to the north All buildings that are closest to the residential neighborhood have extra deep setbacks in order to provide the maximum amount of buffering Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Desion Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect As noted above, the protect site is located along Foothill Boulevard, the City's primary commeraal corridor The bwlding architecture, site planning, and landscaping must be of the highest quality and sophistication To meet this goal, staff recommends the following enhancements Site Plan -The challenge of fitting so many different uses and buildings into the site has not been accomplished, and, in some locations, appears overbuilt as discussed below: a Circulation is awkward around the entrance of the hotel because of the east to west drive aisle being too close to Foothill Boulevard Firstly, the easterly Foothill Boulevard entry is an awkward T-intersection with only enough stacking distance for one car waiting to egress To address this, the Site Plan proposes signs and pavement markings telling the drivers to "Keep Clear" of the on-site T-intersection, however, it is doubtful that drivers will heed such warnings Secondly, a similar problem is evident at the middle Foothill Boulevard entry Normally, a 75-foot stacking distance is recommended with no parking and no intersections. All on-site arculation must eliminate or minimize conflicting vehicle movements. Applicant response: The applicant has designed the circulation around the signal location. This signal location was mutually agreed to by the applicant and the Traffic Engineer. Staff requested that the applicant's traffic engineer indicate the total vehicle taps (ingress/egress) using this driveway D,G,F- Uy ~z~c ~-\ • • DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTPM17594 AND DRC2005-00365 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES June 6, 2006 ~ •• • ~ Page 3 b The bank parking lot is a dead-end that will create arculation problems and ,, congestion, particularly if an exterior ATM machine is provided Staff recommends changing to a one-story building and re-orienting north to south along Rdchester Avenue to provide opportunity to' redesign the parking lot Applicant response: This building will most likely be an office bulgyding, resulting in the elimination of the ATM machine, vehicle congestion, and circulation conflicts that are typically associated with banks. Staff agrees if the buddirig is office use c. The entrance at Rochester Avenue should be treated as a major entry by widening the entire length of the drive to 35 feet Also, the landscape planter on the south ' ,, side of the dnve aisle should be increased in depth (10 feet wide) to allovV for ~' additional landscape material at the entry point Applicant response: The ' architect will study the Site Plan to see if the landscape planter on the south side of the drive can be widened and additional plant material added. d The trash enclosure at the end of the drive aisle off Rochester Avenue should be deleted because it is not needed (all buildings already have their own) Applicant response: Trash enclosure will be deleted. e'' The ADA accessible ramp in the activity center should be constructed with stacked stone because of its prominent location in the activity center, high visibility from Foothill Boulevard, and in order to complement the gas station and convenience . store budding Applicant response: Applicant agreed to add stacked stone. f Strong consideration should be given to create a better system of enhanced pavement that presents a logical, unified design theme Multiple decorative pavement patterns and fragmented areas that have no strong, logical connection should be avoided Consider using enhanced paving for the entire dnve aisles, not lust at the protect entry points This comment was modified to only require a sidewalk connection to Rochester Avenue. g The project has some offset dnve aisles at four-way intersections that should be aligned at right angles for optimum safety and circulation The five dnve aisles east to west near the gas station and convenience store and two-story office should be redesigned to either line up squarely or be substantially offset Applicant response: The project circulation has been laid out utilizing traffic calming techniques. h Provide a logical and functional pathway for deliveries to restaurant kitchens For example, the kitchen service door of the 4,277 square foot restaurant exits into the customer parking lot and is at the opposite end of the bwlding from the trash enclosure Applicant response: These restaurants are spec buildings only. During the plan check process, the Floor Plan will be adjusted in compliance with this comment. 2 Architecture a Gas Station and Convenience Store Building 1) All elevations should be modified to include recesses and projections that create a minimum of 18 to 24 inches of horizontal movement in the footprint 2) All half columns on all elevations should be modified to full columns that will provide greater richness, relief, and shadow All ~.Xl~z-T columns should be modified to be plotted away from the budding wall plane in order ~ z t~,C,F-~+s ~~ ~~i ~i 1 DRC ACTION AGENDA ~~ SUBTPM17594 AND DRC2005-00365 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES I , June 6, 2006 Page 4 ~ r . 1 to create relief opportunities for architectural protections 3) At the north, south, yeast, and west elevations, at the primary towers, the recessed stucco archway should be redesigned to include a decorative scoring pattern with a trellis feature and vine plantings. 4) Consideration should also be given to adding mural arc) accent elements that reflect a winery theme '5) Eliminate a matonty of wall signs The convenience store and food court should each have no more than three wall signs', excluding gas pri'ang signs 6) Relocate the gas price sign from the right side of the north elevation because it is not visible from public Streets (the view is blocked by the trash enclosure and bus shelter) 7) Delete the gas prang signs from the left , side of the north elevatwn and the right side of the east elevation, they exceed the number allowed2 by the Sign Ordinance and are not visible from public streets Applicant response: At the June 6, 2006, DRC meeting, the applicant will ~~ present revised plans in response tq this comment. , Bank and Office Btlilding 1) Redesign gas a one-Story bwldmg and re-orient (see , Site Plan issues above) 2) All elevations on the bank and office bwldmg should be substantially redesigned in order to,authenticaily capture and convey winery-inspired ' architecture The fenestration patterns and forms, roof plane, accent elements, cornices, ~ and exterior design should be redesigned Staff suggests using the buildings at Henry's Marketplace, located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard, as inspiration 3) Resolve the inconsistenaes between the elevations and floor plans FAr example, the west elevation shows four windows, however, none are shown on th'e floor plans , 4) Provide materials/colors for awnings . over the 1st floor windows on the north and south elevations 4) If for bank use, indicate where the vault wdl be located and Whether certain windows will be deleted 5) Show sign locations Applicant Response: At the June 6, 2006, Design Review meeting, the applicant will present revised plans in response to this comment. c Two Restaurant Bwldinos 1) All elevations should be modified to include recesses and prolections that create a minimum of 18 to 24 inches of horizontal movement in the footprint 2)'All half columns on all elevations should be modified to full columns that will provide relief and shadow All columns should be modified to be plotted away from the bwldmg wall plane in order to create relief opportunities for architectural proiections 3) Consideration should also be given to adding murals that reflect a winery theme 4) Show the sign locations 5) Show the exterior mechanical/electrical access doors Applicant response: At the June 6, 2006, DRC meeting, the applicant will present revised plans in response to this comment. Two-Story Office and Commeraal Building 1) All elevations on this bwldmg should be substantially redesigned in order to authentically capture and convey winery-inspired architecture The fenestration patterns and forms and other exterior elements, such as the gable and cornice roof design at the center of the building, should be redesigned The gable roof element at the center of the bwldmg should be strengthened and the mid-level cornices removed Consideration should also be Wall signs limited to one per building face, a maximum of three per business ~ Gas pricing signs limited to one wall sign per street frontage, maximum two, plus one monument per street frontage, maximum two per station A combination of wall and monument signs may be used, but not more than three total signs D'~ ~= - ~{ Et(ts}LB~T ~-3 DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTPM17594 AND DRC2005-00365 -CHARLES JOSERH ASSOCIATES June 6, 2006 ~ , ; Page 5 given to adding accent elements that reflect a winery theme Staff suggests using the bwidings at Henry's Marketplace, located at the southeast comer of Base Lme Road and Day Creek Boulevard, as inspiration , 2) The main tower element on the south elevation is too tall for this two-story budtlmg (at 55 feet, d is Raller than the highest element on the four-story hotel) 3) Add file roof along the entire north elevation instead of flat parapet. 4) Replace the square arches wdh curved arches on the west and east elevations 5) Resolve mconsistenae's between the elevations and floor plans For example, the 2nd floor windows of the north elevation do not seem feasible based upon restroom locations 6) Show the 'sign IocaGons Applicant Response: At the June 6, 2006, DRC meeting, the applicant will present revised plans in response to this comment. e Hotel Building 1) The east elevation lacks suffiaent articulation. This elevation will be very prominent from Foothill Boulevard; hence, requires special attention 2) Stacked stone should be eictended up the second floor on all elevations Applicant response: At the June 6, 2006, DRC meeting, the applicant will 'present revised plans m response to this comment. - Landscaoing a Provide a more creative landscape palette Applicant response: At the June 6, 2006, DRC meeting, the applicant will present revised Landscape Plans in response to this comment. ' Route 66 Rochester Avenue activity center -' Prgvide and clearly show on the Site and Landscape Plans, the required missing elements per the Visual Improvement Plan (see attached exhibits) 1) Repave the intersection and crosswalks with "Street Pnnt" accent paving material 2) Add three Route 66 icons m the parkway. 3) Add specal artwork or district identification at the comer. Applicant response: At the June 6, 2006, DRC meeting, the applicant will present revised plans in response to this comment. Route 66 Suburban Parkway Enhancement Area (near the middle dnveway) - Provide and clearly show on the Site and Landscape Plans, the regwred missing elements per the Visual Improvement Plan (see attached exhibits) 1) Repave the street with "Street Pnnt" accent paving matenal and a Route 66 logo impnnted into the pavement surface 2) Install post and cable barrier behind the curb 3) Add specal artwork icon both m the parkway and median 4) Add mosaic murals or state decal tale-work inlays Revise the sidewalk design to match the Visual Improvement Plan standards Applicant response: At the June 6, 2006, DRC meeting, the applicant will present revised plans in response to this comment. Gas Station and Convenience Store Butldmg Add landscape matenal, such as tree wells and planter pockets, in the decorative pavement at the plaza Applicant Response: At the June 6, 2006, DRC meeting, the applicant will present revised plans in response to this comment. D~~ -~-I ~ ~l4 I f DRC ACTION AGENDA ' SUBTPM17594 AND DRC2005~ 00365 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES i June 6, 2006 ' ' Page 6 ~ ' e Bank and Office Building The landscape planter along the south elevation betyueen the wall plane and the sidewalk should be increased io 10 feet in'width m order to allow for additional landscape material along the entry drive aisle of the'prolect Applicant response: At the June 6, 2006, DRC meeting, the applicant will present revised plans in response to this corpment. f Bank and Office Building Add a landscape planter (minimum 5 feet wide) at the east elevation between the wall plane and the sidewalk Applicant response: At the June 6, 2006, DRC meeting, the applicant will present revised pans in response to this comment. , ~g Restaurant Building At the south elevations on both restaurant bwldings, the depth of the landscape planters should be increased in order to allow for trees For the restaurant bulding closest to the hotel, the landscape setback area south of the building should be revised to include additional plant material. This comment was modified to only request trees at the north elevation of the restaurant building closest to the hotel. The applicant agreed to this modification. 4 Lighting Plan ,Revise the proposed light fixtures to include proper shielding to prevent spillage and glare onto adloirong residences Applicant response: Applicant agreed to utilize glare shields. ' Policv Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the proieGt design without discussion 1 The protect will regwre review and approval of a Uniform Sign Program. 2 All outdoor furniture (tables, benches, trash receptacles, bollards, etc) shall be uniform. Technical Issues The following items are minimum Development Code requirements, which must be incorporated into the protect design without discussion 1 Provide a minimum '24-foot wide, two-way drive-aisle along the east side of the 4,277 square foot restaurant (not 20 feet as shown) , 2 Increase the landscape planter to at least 6 feet between the sidewalk along the westerly Foothill Boulevard entry dove and adioining parking lot 3 The landscape planter along each side of the east entry drive aisle closest to Rochester Avenue off Foothill Boulevard shall be increased to 6 feet in width and include additional plant material Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee review the revised plans presented by the applicant and provide additional input and direction as necessary. Design Review Committee Action Members Present McPhail, Stewart, Coleman Staff Planner Donald Granger ~C ~ _ y g At the meeting, the applicant presented revised drawings and/or written solutions which satisfied TcX~ ~ 5 i I ~~41' I I I CJ DRC ACTION AGENDA ' SUBTPM17594 AND DRC2005~ 00365 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES June 6, 2006 I I ~ Page 7 ' ~I I the Mator Issues The Committee reviewed the protect, was pleased with the revisions made by the applicant, and indicated that the archdecture of the protect wa$, headed m the right direction The Committee recommended approval of the protect, subtect to the following conditions and enhancements listed below I II 1. The base at all pilasters should be 18 to 24 inches wide, subtect to staffs review and approval. ~ ' 2. All columns should be uniform and appropriate to each landscape design feature, and different styles of columns at the same architectural element (i a ,water feature) should be avoided. 3 The landscape plant palette should be more creative with a strong theme, such as, a Napa inspired design The landscape plant palettts should be substantially enhanced with plant material that provides color, variation, and interest i II 4. The colored ribbon gutter in the drive aisles should be eliminated, and the colored pavement areas should be enhanced to th'e satisfaction of staff 5 The fenestratioh patterns on the 6,500 square foot bank/office building should be modified to reflect a pattern that compliments the architectural style of the center. The window and door patterns should be subtect to staffs review and approval ~x~~ -~- ~ D,G~~'y~ ,' . •' ,. DRC2005-00365 Charles Joseph Assoaates Potential for the Presence of Wstoncal Resources. ~ Based on available information, the potential for the presence of historical resources •nt}rm the p%lect area is: Prehistoric Archaeological Resources. , Moderate Historic Archaeological Resources: Wgh Wstoric Resources. ~' Cultural landscapes. Unknown Ethnic Resources. Unknown Comments. Potential for burved Prehistorvc d Historic Archaeological Resources assocmted with the historic structures across the street 6 with the came industry. Recommendations. (following CEQA and NEPA gwdelmes) An archaeological monitor must be on-site during arty earth disturbing actiwties. If prehistonc or historc resources over 50 years of age are encauntered during lord modification, then nctivntms iP the immediate area of the finds should be halted so that the archaeologist can assess the fold, determine its significance, and make recommendations for appropriate mrt~gation mea.ures within the gwdehnes of the California Enwronmeninl Quality Act and/or the Federal Nat~oral Enrtronmental Pohry Act. Submission of a historical resources management report by the professional to documerM tha monitorug, to evaluate resource mgmficance and integrity, and, if neceswry, to evaluate project impacts and propose mitigation measures to m~t~gate potential adverse impacts m accordance with the approprate laws. If human remains are encountered on the property, then the San Berrardmo County Coroncr~s Office MUST be contacted within 24 hours of the find, and all work halted until a ckaronce is given by that office and arty other involved agencies Contact the County Coroner at 175 South Lena Raad, San Bermrdmo, CA 92415-0037 or (909) 387-2543. If you have arty further questions, please, contact me at (909) 307-2669 x 255, Monday through Assistant Center Coordinator 15 June 2006 Date ~, E l~ l 5 ~ Robin E. Loska ~~ • it • ,~ • ARCHAEOLOGICAL INFORMATION CENTER ,~ '` San genrardrno County Museum Son Bernardino 2024 Ororge Tree Lane (909) 307-2669x255 Redlands, CA 92374 FAX (909) 307-0689 • y ~~~ rinskaC sbcm sbcounty aov '' HISTORICAL RESOURCES REVIEW FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO GVLAMON6A PLANNING DEPARTMENT Incaice/Reference Number 06-06-15-02 ' Planning Number' DRC2005-b0365 Lharles Soseph Associates" Acres/Miles: 8.21 Acre(s) ~' U565 Quad (s). 6uasti 7.5' quad ~ ` , previousH Inventoried Historical Resources (that rs resources older than 45 nears m aae meludma rehistorrc and historic archaeolo ical resources historic resources cultural lands and ethnic resources l None known to exist wrthm or adjacent to the pholect area ~ Reoorted to exist wrthm or ad wcent to o%rect aria: ~ ' p Prehistoric' Archaeological Resources. 1 1 Historic Archaeological Resources. CA-SBR-2910H-Notiorwl Old Trolls Hwy/Rarte 66 which has been determined eligible for the National Rcgister. • 6+ Historic Resources 36-016463-La Fourcades Store (Cowgirl Theater), 36-016464- Agauottr Winery and 4. structures shown on U565 Ontarro'15' Quad, 1954. p Cultumllandscopes• 0 Ethnic Resources. Historic Maas Examined: Bkckburn,1932; U565 Cucamonga, 1894, U565 Ontarro,1954, Beasley, 1892, AAA-carious, Ha11,1888. Previous Field Surveys for Resources. 1060479 (see attach) may partially cover the pro,lect area. however, they did not survey the entire parcel Comments. r ~~ F - S Charles Jos~uh Associates PUBLIC/PRIVATE SECTOR Iv1ANAGE1vBiNT SERVICE 909-481-1822 • 10681 Foothill Blvd , Swte 395 • Ranclho Cucamonga, CA • 91730 i i January 5, 2006 (Rewsed February, 8<h 2006) City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Dan Coleman, Principal Planner 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re• Parkinq Study for Victoria Hospitality Center • SCOPE OF PARKING SURVEY The site plan provided by JWDA indicates that the site has 466 clearly identified vehicle parking spaces, and requires 502 parking spaces per the current development code parking requirements As part of this protect approval, the hospitality center will be required to have a reciprocal parking agreement and a mix of offs: retail and restaurant uses to take advantage of a mixed-use community for the surrounding residential Parkinq Study Goals The following parking study has 2 goals 1 The first is to determine if the project experiences potential substantial conflict with proposed l business, and where those conflicts occur 2 The second is to analyze this data to determine if the types of businesses of a particular zone will allow for shared parking and where they are located and how that affects the overall parking needs of the business uses during peak periods of the business operations for tustification of a shared parking analysis DEFINITIONS The following parking study definitions have been outlined for reference Transient aarking: Parking described as a patron coming into the site and leaving within a 3-5 minute time frame • Page 1 Victoria HosprtaLty Center Parking Study ~ , E i ~ ~ S Z E~.~s err ~ ,+ • Irtgress transienUEgress transient parking: ,Cars ingress into a zone parking space, or cars egress into a zone parking space , Net Parkins Change: The amount of cars using parking in any given done over specified gins of either Ingress or Egress For example, if 6 cars ingress into a zone and 5 cars egress out of that zone, the Net Parking Change would be 11 measuring the total number of car~movement in that zone Net Parking Demand: The amount of spaces measurt?d as gains (ingress) or loses (egress) in any given zone to accommodate the transient parking demands over specified )line For example, if 15 came into a zone (ingress), and 13 left (egress), the net parking demand would (+2) cars creating an increased parking demand, conversely if 13 ingresses and 15 egresses a net parking demand decrease of -2 cars creating a decreased parking demand for the zone, 0 would be an even 8mount of cars entering and leaving a zone wlthin the specified sample penod A higher number (+) would be an indication of a more people entering a zone, and lower number (-) would be an indication of more people leaving a zone , Static Net: The Static Net is the overall parking demand during a specified time within the site for a particular use For example, Static net of a lawyer's office from 6pm to Gam is "0" due to the business not being open Technically, the site allocates the spat`s needs parking but not during the time specified and can be credited toward a primarily night time use, such as~a sit down restaurant Parking Peak Potential: (Highest Block Total Zone Parking Count + Highest Block Ingress transient count= Parking Peak Potential) This is for equating the "worst case scenario" that could be extrapolated from the data The total amount of cars in a sample time block and total that ingress into the Center during a given .time sample block (2 or 3 hours) even though they are mutually exclusive Shared Parking: Parking that is used iointly within a parking zone for other uses when operations arb not normally conducted during the same hours, or when hours of peak use vanes For example, the static net for Outback steak house (night only business) at 3 30 PM is "0", and the 61 spaces allocated for that use could be shared between the Coffee Shop and Mortgage Office (day businesses) in that zone allocation Data Organization 8 Analysis In order to obtain our first goal as outlined above, we have reviewed the site plan to determine what uses on the site can be considered similar as to the use and related proximdy We have created zones that will identify the areas of use and typical business operations and types of business typically anticipated for the type of use They are as follows Zone 1 Gas Station Store (4,400 sq ft) and Food Use (3,700 sq ft) consisting of a 24-hour operation This zone meets the City parking requirements and can be considered a use to stand-alone Zone 2 1-two story Office Bwlding consisting of approximately 6,500 sq ft total, 26 regwred spaces and 1 two story office/Retail vertically dwided retail on the first floor, office on the second consisting 46,000 sq ft total of 184 regwred spaces 52,500 regwring 210 spaces These buildings can be considered stand-alone buldings, but are technically 36 spaces short • Page 2 Victoria Hosprtahty Center Parking Study ~' C F.~,rJ 3 ~x~~ ~-\ Zone 3 2-one story sit down restaurant pads consisting of approximately 10,883 sq ft total requ+nng 108 spaces • as are provided on the plan These buildings can be considered stand-alone bwldings, but w+ll prov+de s+lrplus parking for portions of the day and afternoon hours ~ Zone 4 A four-story hotel consisting of 112 rooms, total parking regwfed 117 spaces, 117 spaces are provided This bwld+ng and zone can stand-alone and meets the City parking requirements We have determined that per goal 1, there is a parking conflict for Zone 2 per the City parking requirements • DATA ANALYSIS We have determined that Zone 2 is deficient 36 parking spaces (7% deficient of the overall site) Now, In order to satisfy goal 2, we need to analyze the parking regwred and peak business hours of operation per the anticipated use Zone 2 contains 46,000 sq ft total+ng 23,000 sq ft commercial retail and 23,000 sq ft office and astand-alone 6,500 sq ft office bwldmg It has been our experience that the' complimer<ting uses will employ a shared parking , allocation for the site The office use is primarily daytime use and retail is primarily nighttime uses This is backed by several parking studies that our office has participated in previous developments and personal parking observations of retail/office ingress & egress traffic We are confident the shared parking between the Office (primarily day time use) and restauranUretail uses (pnmahly night time uses) will compliment each other for a stand alone parking within the same zone (Zone 2) end any overflow parking for either use would be complimented by zone 3 (restaurant uses) or zone 4 (hotel use) which are pnmahly night time/afternoon peak potential Roughly 23,000 sq ft of office is proposed on the second Story of the "commercial bwldmg" and the stand-alone office budding 6,500 sq ft When the daytime business operations close for the evening (typically around 5pm) there will be a substantial net parking change to the s+te since the office users w+ll be leaving This . will create a static net parking requirement of "0" for the office use and thus a net parking surplus of 118 spaces lust for zone 2 and that main access for this office use is located at the northern end of the site The location of the parking +n th+s zone will help to provide for additional parking the net parking demand during the 4pm to 6pm trens~ent parking trends associated wdh the "day time"uses and the "night time uses It has been our observation and experience that daytime office users have transient +ngress and egress traftlc during the day as part of the business operations their net parking demand dramatically decreases due to the transient egress at approximately 4pm and statistically subsides between 5-6pm depending on the nature of the speck user , Moreover, the restaurant users leave /ust after lunch 1-2pm and are relatively low static net from 2pm-4 30 pm (approximately 15 and typically employees) begin to occupy the parking spaces for droner only after they leave other office centers (typically starting at 4pm) and then park in a zone for restaurant use Parking requirements for a particular use are drawn from the peak potential for the particular use, hence the 1 parking space per 100 sq ft for restaurant, 1 per 250 for office, etc adopted by City ordinances We now have determined that for zone 2 will provide for surplus parking during the evening hours of operation for the retail uses in zone 2 and restaurant uses in zone 3 During the evening peak operations for the retail, hotel & restaurant the site will have a surplus of 96 parking spaces in zone 2 from the office suites being likely closed since to office being a daytime business operation Therefore, the restaurants, which have a higher net parking demand during the evening and weekend hours, are able to utilize that surplus parking to create an ideal shared parking situation Hotels do have more of a trensitory net parking demand during the eady afternoon hours If the peak parking potential is reached for the hotel during that portion of the day (2-5pm), the hotel patrons would be able to utUize that overflow parking restaurant zone 3, however for this study we are not requesting that the hotel provide shared paiking as we have considered this a "stand alone zone" It is important to note that the Hotel use does provide for pedestrian traffic from the hotel to the restaurant/retail uses, which will not need to park in zone 2 or 3 so the net parking • Page 3 V+ctona Hosprtalrty Center Parking Study 1 + C ~ ~ J \ •'~Xl~~~c (rZ ''I' I demand for zone 2 & 3 decreased The protect is technically only'36 spaces deficient, so there will be a surplus of 72 spaces m zone 2 alone, and zone 2 will still provide for additional 118 shared parking spaces dunn~ the peak business hours of operations foFthe restaurant and retail uses during the (weekends, and weekdlay's 6-9 pm) In conclusion, the proposed protect will only need to utilize 36-shared parking spaces is 7% shared parking ~ " Recommendation; This protect has been designed with complimenting uses will employ a shared parking allocation for the site as provided for m the CC&R's We are confident the shared parking between the Office (primarily day time use) and restaurant/hoteUretad uses (primarily night time yses) will compliment each other Roughly 23',b00 sq ft of office is proposed on the second story of the "commercial budding",,and 6,500 sq ft forthe stand alone office bwlding (29,500 sf total), which will be a use that is primarily a during the day time operations Therefore, during the "peak" operations of the retail, hotel and restaurant during the evening hours, the site wtll have a " surplus of 118 parking spaces alone m zone 2 due to the offiice swtes being likely closed during the evening due to office being a daytime business operation The protect is technically only 36 spaces deficient overall, however there will be a surplus of 82 spaces during the nighttime peak'busmess hours of operations the retail, hotel and restaurant In conclusion, the proposed protect will only need to utilize 36-shared parking spices, which is 7% of the total overall parking During the evening restaurzrht peak hours (8pm to 9pm) the site will only need 384 spaces (502 n;qurred for all uses minus 118 spaces for 29,500 office= 384 total) and the site will have 466 available Conversely, the restaurants lowest net parking demand rs during the 2-4 30pm, which will help to offset any overflow parkng ~f the peak potential ~s reachefl for the hotels peak hours of operation during the early aRemoon The parking requirement defiaencies for the zone 2 are symb~ot~c with zone 3, and zone 3 rs symbiotic with zone 4 Conflicts are experienced due, to the high parking ratios required for restaurant parking • and therefore the allocation of the add~t~onal parking ~n zone 2 to be shared with zone 3 during that nighttime peak hours of operation for the restaurants Based on our parking study, we believe the foregoing data and analysis support the necessary findings outlmdd m the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code for shared parking allocation for staggered business use operations and mixed use concept with the hotel use Based upon the proposed protect wdl,fulfill the parking demand for the site during all hours of operation without adverse impact to the Victoria Hospitality Center and pnnapal evening hours of the restaurant, hotel and retail operational uses, which will serve to create a surplus with the identified parking patterns located m Zone 2 Respectfully, Charles J Buquet Charles Joseph Associates u Page 4 V~ctona Hosprtahty Center Parking Study ~(~ `' - CJ rj ~X1~ts'gz=T L-3 Charles Joseph Associates PUBLIC/PRIVATE SECTOR MANAGEMENT SERVICES Victoria Hospitality Center Neighborhood Meeting Minutes , • Meeting Date. January 3, 2006, 6pm to 8pm 1. Questions were raised regarding the type of users and asked for ' identification of users; Union 76 gas statidn and Sheraton Hotel were ident~ed. Concems Edison Pro~ierty is not maintained well and vagrants into neighborhoods. Desire for City to put up wall at end of Chervil Notified homeowners of GPA and development code amendment initiation dates and related logistics. Concerns about " drinking behind office/retail building. Positive feedback in relation to Hotel use and general concurrence that they are high quality tenant and that would ensure through property management that vagrants and loiterers would not be an attracted to the site. 2 Questions regarding interaction between homeowners on the north property line and setback. Glaring of light, etc Setback was confirmed r at 15' and our property would slope down to provide for further , buffering between the properties and that light standards would tae at base parking lot levels. A drainage issue raised and was explained as to how to address existing drainage. Foregoing was acceptable to the . neighbors who adjoined the property line to the north. Discussion about how certain properties would be getting larger back yards and that they could use our proposed decorative wall as their rear property line Attempt to grade so that back yards would be flush with the new wall. This was well received from the neighbors, as they confirmed their own desire to construct the wall themselves but that our client would be doing that on their behalf. 3. Concerns about existing traffic on the residential "Chervil" road. Desire to have speed bumps or stop signs installed on the road. Said that v4e should ask and require City of Rancho Cucamonga to install stop signs on those roads. We provided logistical information in this regard, and how to contact Police department to start neighborhood ticketing programs and City Traffic Engineering relative to traffic control requests. 4. Asked if drives thrus-are being proposed, and we notified that none are proposed for this site plan. Asked about business circulation for the office/retail buildings, we indicated that loading areas and main parking are already provided at front of Office/retail building and oriented toward Foothill. • Of&te 909.481.1822 800.240.1822 Faz 909.481.1824 City Centez • 10681 Foothill Blvd , State 395 • Raacho Cucamonga, CA • 91730 A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ~x~~ M 1~tC--, r - 5 to I ~ ~ 5. There were repeated requests arld demands that atraffic-slowing device be installed on Chervil such as speed bumps and stop signs to slow traffic. Those not stopping at the comers and speeding have crashed into several homes in that area. Complaints have been lobbied and they desire to have City Traffic resolve this issue. Several complaints about wanting streetlights installed and or having light pole lights replaced with better bulbs. Advised them these are issues they would need, t;o address with City Traffic and Engineering. 6. Request for additional streetlights added to be'added on Chervil and Fennel, as well as repeated requests for Stop sign & speed bumps. I did receive a phone call and concern from a homeowner that chose not to attend the meeting that there may be graffdi on the north side of the , wall at the, end of the cul de sac, ,request for landscaping (ivy,) on that wall and to confirm that City was in charge of maintaining this wall. Confirmed wdh City, that they wdl de responsible for these improvements. Our client can install vine pockets along the wall at this area to discourage potential graffiti on the street side of the cul de sac • EX~Pzc M- ~ i~ G--~~ - 5 _l ,, .I li I m , S. Z 6 oEO SrAGHETn • FACTORY ~ 1 ,' f ~I ' I I I • i-ENISTINC STRECT\CAPk At rl 3 Ruuir GF Icom----- ---~ PlacemeN of Spcual \rnaork nr Dlstnct Idenuficatlon al all J Cai ~ , I -E%IStlp'G STREETSGPE I ,~ ~• , ~~ . :l ~ + I I •• ~ i 1R !~ = • Yg}~ • r ~` ~ is , nfT,` a FOOTHILL,BOULEVARD Add i Route GG Icon. .o Parkway I_er anon, on all 4 Sldr--~ n ~, i EAI~TINC STRttTSCAPt~ - t+ W E%ISTING NNTVERS WAIA • UENVV'S % Z d IY i W J ~ W s `r3 Foothill Baulevarcl - F{istoric Rauh bb- ROCHf.STFR AVENUEACTIVITY_CENrER `.IfPr;ISI dl)r LI nIIYlllt~ { IrnSt'r115 IVANi EXISTING ELCyiFNTS •Doublc Ra\s IAIn rn2;l'\gl of Cnpc ~41,rtir m ' - Planted Tree \Yr•II< - Duph<.m Sln'r Kr rpc Pd1 + m Ib~n)I , 16'-12' 10.4dc Cun rc~c kdrvvaIL. wnh f3ncL R, ndnG NlA I uman v rh I Tnlblr Ruvv Accent of Crape h1vnirv m I'I ul'~ II In r 4V'1 Ili .q~ N'~dc Turl P.ukwars Getu u•n (orb anA Sldrw alk aitd t Vllirl ARC S< ~~-"~^ - - ADDITIONAL ELEMENTS TO HELP UNIF\' ~ ` '' + •Repeat S¢Ic><.alk and Tree Pa6r rns on the Eact Slde< " - __ ~ and bong Srtlcwalk Out to Curb Adptc encs ' •Rldr Cnncwalks.vlth \ccenl P,ning,4lazulal Matching thr Color o' IhE I Nlsnng Cunr role -- - -- 1dd i Rnutr G6 Ir on, In ?•ve~s In Ihr Medlarn fun PalLwavc o) Ihn ~ (Dint n •Route o6 Icons \vrthm nc~ Planted hln IarL\.ays and un Fnhcr Slde nl ions ShcltE•r on foodull Bivd Cross• alk< I:i.erl m Arv rni r'aanr; ~A1,)4 nal .gl)~lal Accent Pavemem In the Intersection to Ma,r h Matching the Color u. Ihr I Nlsllnl; ('onl «I' all Ac[nm Center intnncebon~ PaVpK m thr M. dlalx .Platt mcnt ut Arn.ork nr Dlsnul Idcn;lnr anon mall 4 Cornr`rv •14str'n f\•drstnan LeT r`I 1 Ighl Pale s .Ail North anEl South bound micrsr cling strcr Is _ should have Route Gb and dntncl rdentn¢aUan L-0° \Vuie Concrete Banding 1°anporared on tit the frxnhlll Bhd ,I«etnamr _ signs -bollards on Cakh Corner •Intenor o(Intera ao~ Pau'd m Dario Colored Au-c•nl ~samg Matcnal Man hmg Ihr Hr Inng ~ boot Patlcrn n(Ihr• (onr rulc Pa\•rn m Ihr # MetLan ~ b;,~ ~Ir Sec Palene for Chul<c<at Ic nos, ~pecrnl Arbwrk ANT Fc alure<, Sl'reel Furrll;un md+h ien; P.+CI ~r, * Lqumatc Rlghl-of-vVm and Tld,l lr Lanr ~ shall F?r Per Clty'~ (ienela~ PI' ` (Yrudallon Hr`mt .t r%ISrINc HISHIDIC Housr --Pres!•rvc the Crlsllnq CI Camino RE•al flcll and Rrhxatr to thr ConTrr tin A4oro CNpusun` -- ' - II ~~ -- •-•• ': f• ti F +' • ~- • ~ _.r f ~ n (, ~ ~ _ ., - " ~ i ' ~~ t ~ ~ 1 a~ :_ ycv-r: ~ - 4 ~ , sR a`_ ~ +y i ~~ ' ` ~ S~ . I tit N ~ ~~ ^ye ` . 1 I . ~ ~ - ~ S' .. hi _ 1 6. „t 5 So ~ ~_ t } ti~ ~ ~~ K , ~. ~ e ~/1~ ~ ~~~~~ 4 ~` F . ~ctttP~~T- . .,N-! ~~ - f~ u II> iW~ ~1 ~ ,~- - t I r ' x `{ 4~ c ,_ ._ ' . - f C=G L' L FGA L a- m ~ ~' -yo u m d - -no. av~' d w ~ ' , G fn [. o 'i c - c ~ E w _ ,_ v ~ c°O~ c C ~, '~ r rn - - --------_- --- y r' 3:.t~tir~ ~CrCa~2t'Qri~ ` d'ilStC:~"i(: ~:!at1f~ ~~ , y f xhUnt( Tr,T C 1 «nc; --- --- ---` SIIeVNBAN PARKN'1Y ENNAhCEMENi AREA PROTOTYPE - - I~ [ elving I .rnds. aped Parkwa>• \ ~ } I ~Setbnck wuh 5¢lett. Ik Trees \ ° NOTES , • h k and lulfiMln lb'I- ~ <~ ~ ' Replxoa„ strto ol ne exlmng par t.at ~ ' . , '~ \ ~ plannnq'su!rt alk wnh a sr • mm of rnhant<A rcaiums ZS!tt t ~'I lr r l nt l dNny Mdfena l0 ~ ~ \ ~ ~ Mdif h Ite a[ nUlY r tYVer arCPN tC.lltlnM1 wRh NI[)6'nerl I d lk ' h h ' I h ' 1 ,\t3+c h th<• (olol 01 Yh. fslUlllg j : t t¢ rt. a Imlm t+l , arc x 7 S Y 45 cnpi ,~ aCCem NConC ttr Hrltk l'a,ers 1 _ ` r++ j - - tolr>rtKitoncretr bnck bandrog tlapt mtrtletrees h h l k F I . ne C's and xrtKla arhtnr Icon tcannes 12nutr G6 L<ga Impnrncd urta the I ~• ~ O e - I 61hanremen+ tldet.alk arra<rtxllA he unlred rot Sul f u e nl the Pav me nl - ; • ~ m J ~ ~ ` placement w mrn ur mush or t,a[e decal ulro _ } ^Yn t (olp: Mtrt~et m I«'e N'rlk ~ ~ ~ t ~~ •Re ilorc ,+ As <narh of the tta of lane n~en-en, t nh I I ` ~ Sp tcer at 1 S' on C[ Hirt- , . ~ y ~ O_ LL I ' ~, .pedal au em pavmR maten.,i and a Rnule f>51n¢u ! S Impnnted min the wrfacc ° 1u "nt Rnrh Hdndmg ~ •Hrolatt•a-13 strr4h of tht mc,6an nl uro n>ISl;l tnh 6nc k palls rn slr k t not rcie pat r rs to rnap h ,he ev.nng I I stout Pool and Cobh ~ paters m the ntedran PIa.C n It of the sprual a•n.ork Ruu'v ar Satoh f3arr,r; a, wmfeature. In the nudrlle Platenrlu o, Spcu'I s °.- 5 s 'i t°# Al work ICUn_____ ~ 13enrh-_ _ _ _ __ •© i 1 ~ ® ~ ~ l~nLzr hnrk Partern ut I. - L ! Canirclr•P,r.[rsmbt ~dlan to °~.~ Yi~ - ~ I'°~ bta,ut Evalnh Patin i - _ _ hxpar 4•d S¢k evalk ,1mas ~<wld ~ 13c Unll>cd vn Plat ems ni pi hknal: rviu. als of St« • Decal h I _ ` r _ Tilrt,nrk I~ilat. 4°,e , - y e _ t ~ ~ a _ 1u rnl (e>lulcd hunt I 'It - - ! j" - LxISUnG 41aLan , I I i ; i A' ~~ ~ ~ ._ _;- C~ISting Lands<.q lr rl P,t _t av ' ~ i ° Srtba3k talh Sul<walk I ots ! , I Lxl~'l {, AlMldn l,~SOl may ____ ~ i _____ _ C __ -_ _______u_ ___ ~ ! Nld Tuli uV1111 Ib'1 ~ ! ~~ ~ r ~ > ~ I [ ~ ~ • . ~ V ' •Ir° FxhlbR R ~s r m • • • i , I Z~ W i _ Foothill Baulevaru~ - 1-iistc~~~doute L;ib ' SI IIi11Rll\~ ISUTA\t \1 I V H \\I I~VI \ 1 AIt1 A I'RI II U111'I II -GRpr Ntndesm uee\'411: i Placement ul Spenzf I _ {lapr ~h¢~s,; i•„„\ielL ~pau d at 15 an Cenle.r 1 ~ ' ~ VrhmrA /Icon' ~ C u.u~ d n I ~ nr <"rpier-, I ~ -- \c c en. Colored Cnnere le I _ \, n'n[ Colou d („n~ mb I G ± III `` ,-__Plau•ment of Special A k ~,,,..,.. ~-._„ti ' Pl,u r mem ut aprc;al _ rtwor /kon i I 1 if %~~~ ~7Q .1rhvork,lcnn ¢~ ~., L. n ~ ~ ~ \ t r- ` y i j ~-Hlstonc Puq and Cahle 1 ~`°~` ~ / ^~} R d S B 1- ; bassi I', ~nl a vl (=,blr ~ '~ ;', .:~~ _ ~ `"~ , ~ ~ on wa\ ates arner i H~nrhsav', II'~R Itamcr ~ } *,-, i ~ ( $ ,ems _f ~ I i f '~"'° ~ w '~ / qtr -F .- ~i,' ~~'"~ i't F ~k ~ FOOTHILL BOUIFVARD _IUOilllll 60ULFVARU "` _ i 4 _ ~I ~~ ~ 16T1murluln Fvr.Ung Traellanc~ Lxlshng Median - d I ~~ v - i~ ~ ~ - -..~ j I I A i II E' ''i ~~I _ ~i I II I xnnn}' lra~, I t inM ~b'Vh'In.um nch .' - _ I I •~i •~`~i I •• 9i-~1 IFPI '~ ~fe '0 C _ ~ `~V ~ O i , V Q = 1 . d ~ ~ ' ~ E ~, _ O cc ~ ~ ~ _~ a c .-. ~ L .~ 3 ~ !', t'~ 9~ _{ _ ~~ O ti C ~ }.l ~~~ tl A K .C '~-y ~ • ~ IM..I _ ~ t'1 ~ ~~ Y ¢~• .~ .~ b ~~~ ~ ~ ~~h~" a i ~ '` ~ yfr i, "'`~~d1 :M ._ + 3 ~~ '' i L- ~ _ l;, ?y .i ~ , - - l) ~. i ~ . '- U r ~`~~ a'.I~, ,e(f ~, ''- ~~ ~~~ i !~ l ° "f " - ~"~~'s'a ,~ to -~~~ Y~ L Q ~ y~ yl 4 I S /_ • C i • i 1 • EX H ~ i~ tT ,< +` ~ ~ _ M-N ~ ~ i i,+ i - i 1 ' CRy of Rancho Cucan,nnga Planning Omsion , (sogl an-275o ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I - Initial'Study) The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to pity policies, ordinar?ces, and guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please dote that d is the responslbdrty ofthe applicant to ensure that the appl~cahon is complete at the time of submrttal, Ctty staff well not be available to peAorm work required to provide missing lnformadon ' ' ' flpphcahon Npmber for the profed to which this form ' pertains , DRC2005-00365 and SUBTPM 17504 • Protect vdona Business Hospilallty Center Title Name & Address of pm/ect owner(s) 509 RoseMane Dina, Arcadia, Ce9f007 323-633-6460 Name & Address of developer or protetM sponsor Charles Joseph Assoaates Chuck Buquet 10681 Foothill Blvd Suile 395, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact Person & Charles Joseph AssoGates, Chuck Buquet Address 10681 Foothill Blvd Sude 395, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Telephone (909) 481-1822 Number • Name & Address of person preparing thrs loan (ll different from above) As shown above exh,b~'r ~ Informahon indicated by astensk (') is not roquin;d ofnon-construction CUPS unless otherwise requested by stab ~ 1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy oI the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the pro/ed site, and indicate the site boundanes ' 2) Provide a set of color photographs, which show repn:sentahve wews into the site from the noRh, south, east and west, wews into and from the site from the pnmary access points, which serve the site, and representahve mews of signrfrcant featun;s from the site Include a map showing locahon o(each~photograph , 3) Pro(ect Locahon (descnbe) NE Comer o/Foothill and Rochester Rancho Cucamonga, CA 4) Assessors Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet i/necessary) 0227-152-18, and 0227-152-31 , 5) Gross Site Area (adsq 8 92 ft) , • 6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area o/public streets 8 proposed dedicahons) 8 22 7) Descnbe any proposed general plan amendment orzone change which would affect the pro/act site (attach additonal sheet A necessary General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Ofice Park to Community Commercial Development Code Amendment to allow hotel with a bar as condrhonally permitted use See attachedlus6frcahon in/omrabon 8) Include a descnphon of all permits which wrll be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the protect General Plan Amendment, General Plan Amendment Zone Change, Development Code Amendment, QIC,F - ~D • g)~ d an~ma~s, matuire treesn~rarls andtroads, drainagefcourses, and icen c aspiectsmDescnbe a~ex shng sttnrchrres on sde (including age and conddion) and the use of the structures' Attach photographs ofsignificant /eatures descnbed In addition, site all sources of in(ormat~on (i a ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, biohc and archeological surveys, traffic studies) • ~. Site is currently a vacant parcel with retaining wall structure, no landscaping, existing street improvements , ~~ and street lights along Foothill and Rochester Power transmission poles to the east, hosting residential to the North existing home depot center to the west, and Di Carlo rock house to the south, surtounded by vacant land and Masi plaza to the southwest 10)Descnbe the known cultural and/or histoncalaspects ofthe sde Site all sources ofin(ormat~on (books, published reports and oral history) ' Site histoncally had a wticultural use Site has been subled to annual weed abatement and soils dispng for past 20 plus Years 11)Descnbe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the sde (aircraft, roadway noise, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses basting noise sources from Foothill Blvd and Rochester traffic that wall have mammal impact on any land use for this site .. _.._,___,,... s ~~me Nmeo imnads and aooroonate mitigation volt be a component of the development apphcahon _..____........ ~~e ...,a, ao „n, mRr.~nns-00365 and SUBTPM 17504) G l~ - ~S 12) Describe the proposed protect in detail This should provide an adequate descnphon of the site rn terms o/ultimate use which will result Irom the posed pro/ect Indreate rithem ark, proposed phases for development, the extent ofdevelopment to occur • wdh each phase, and the anticipated completion of each mcn:mertt Attach additional sheet(s) d necessary i ~ i The proposed General Plan Amendment Zone Change & Development Code Amendment unit allow for the proposed uses of protect already on file vnth the City There is a proposed median break filing separate from this application to help ease the current wngestion at 'i ,~ theosoiulthnThe protect will be a multi usee developmenttknownhas ~ctona Hosp tal~ BusuiessdPark andes t to located at the NEC comer of Foothill and Rochester It will contain 1-two story office buildings on top of retail suites approximately 50,000 sf total, a 113 room limited service hotel (art extended-stay type geared toward business travelers), 2 full service, free standing sit down restaurant of approximately 6,000 sf, and , approximately 5,000 sf of bank drive thru, gas station mix of business and quick service casual dining (e g Bata Fresh, Quiznos, Coffee Bean, etc) All parking wall be located ontdrade in the interior of the development away from the surrounding thoroughfares, with all the mator structures at the center of the site The design concept is to create a business center where all the business amenities for the employed office over retail tenants and neighboring use are contained on site, and will include overnight accommodations for the business traveler The protect will employ extensive landscaping and quality architecture to create a high profile "place° in Rancho Cucamonga that should, in turn, attract'the best tenants n 1.~/ 13)Dss~se Indreate hedtype o~andruse (resdienhal, commercial, eltc)Sintensrlyolland use (one /amlyhapa~l nt houses, shops, depafinent stores, etc) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) West -Existing Home Depot center East -Immediately adtacent is the Edison Power transmission lines Beyond being a Circuit City Retail Center South -Approximately 11 undeveloped acres, with an existing non-conforming residential house at the comer Currentty in process for a retail development North - 6cisting single family residential tract 14)Will the proposed protect change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the pro~ect~ This wall continue the existing and newly constructed retail comdor along foothill and allow for a safer turn movement for the traffic generated by both businesses which well help the flow of traffic at this intersection and wall serve to ease traffic impact at Foothill Blvd and Rochester with signalized median break at the east property line, approximately 1000' east of Rochester Indreate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount How wall these noise level affect ad/acent properties and on-sde uses What methods of soundproofing are proposed 15) ~~ F ~~ This rs a General Plan Amendment related to a filing he preposed uses will be consistent with the nose levels Anticipated under the current zoning The specific uses allowed Under the current zonmglust does not allow for thb type of undedymg uses pmposed under the apphcahon currently on file with the City 16) Indicate preposed removals and/or replacements of mAture or sc~mc trees There are no trees curtently on the site The proposed plan involves extenswe new landscaping and the application rs for a General Plan Amendment Zone Change only at this time 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drams Site is surtounded by an existing stone sewer system that this proled vnll uti~¢e and this is only for a General Plan Amendment only 18)Indreate expelled amount of waterusage (See Attachment A for usage estimates) ForfuRherclarrficahon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Drstnct at 987-2591 a Resrdential (gaUday) Peak,use (gaUDay) b Commercial/Ind (gal/day/ac) 3000 Peak use (gaUmrNac) 6000 ~ 19)Ind~cate proposed method of sewage disposal Septic Tank Sewer If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is pmposed indicate expelled daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clanficahon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distract at 987- 2591 a Resrdential (gal/day) b Commercral/Ind (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS 20) Number of residential units Detached (mdreate range of parcel saes, minimum lot size and maximum lot sae N/A Attached (mdreate whether units are rental or for sale units) N/A 21)Anhcrpated range o/sale pnces and/or rents Q,C,~-lad Sale Pnce(s) $ to Rent (per month) $ to $ ~' • 22) Specdy number of bedrooms by unit type , '~ , 23) Indicate anhc~pated household sze by unit WA ' type 24)Ind~cate the expected number of school children who will be msdmg wrthm the pro/ect Contact fhe appropnate School Drstncts as shown m Attachment 8 , a Elementary 0 b Junior High 0 c Senior High 0 COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type of use(s) and ma/or function(s) of commeraal, mdustnal or msbtuhonal uses The project will be a multi-use development known as Victona Hospitality Center and is located at the NEC corner of Foothill and Rochester It will contain 1-two story office buildings on top of retail suiles approximately 46,000 sf total, a 112 room limited service hotel (an extended-stay type geared toward business travelers), 2 full service, free standing sit down restaurant of approximately 6,600 sq ft 8 4,200 sq ft, and approximately 6,500 sq ft of office/bank, 3,700 8 4,400 gas station mix of business and gwck service casual dimrtg (e g Bafa Fresh, Quiznos, Coffee Bean, etc) All parking v~nll be located on-grade m the mtenor of the development away from the surrounding thoroughfares, with all the mayor structures at the center of the site The only uses needed for this general plan amendment is the wider range of retail services and hotel consistent with what we believed was approved 15 years ago by the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga 26) Total floor area o(commemial, mdustnal, ormst~tubonal uses by tYPe See above descnphon for details lei • 27) Indicate hours of operation To be determined O(ryce hours pnmanly dunnq the day retail pnmanly dunnq the evenings Not know at this hme however office uses are anticipated to be pnmanly day time operehons as that is the nature o/ the business The gas station will be 24 hours 28) Number of employees Total To be determined, approximately 100 people would be a guess ,not know at this hme Maximum Shin Time o/Maximum Shin 29)Prowde breakdown o/anticipated/ob classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an ind~cahon o/the rate of hire /or each classification (attach addrtonal sheet dnecessary) Not know at this hme 30) Estimation o/the number of workers to be hired that currently reside rn the Cdy i inknnwn at this hme. 100+ is a guess due to various shift hours and weekends 31)For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283) ' Proposed prOJeCt will comply with All applicable standards Wall construction will inn concurrent wdh gredmg to Minimize construction noise ALL PROJECTS 32)Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the pro/ect been contacted to determine their ability to pmwde adequate service to the proposed pro/ect~ If so, please indicate their response All agenaes contacted have indicated them ability to provide adequate service to the pro)ect site • l~C F ~ ~0~ l,y, 33)In the known history of this property, has there been any use, Storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or t8xic'matenals~ Examples of hazardous and/or toxic matenals include, but a2 not I~mrted to PCB 5, radioactive substances, peshades and • herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage of any of the above Please list the matenals and descnbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the datels pf use, d known No ' 34) loll the proposed protect involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals, including but not limited to those examples listed above 1/yes, provide an inventory of all such matenals to be used and proposed method of'disposal The location of such' uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans ~ ~ No I 1 hereby certify that the statements famished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and inlomiabon required for adequate evaluation of this ported to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information prgsented am true and crowed tot he best of my knowledge and belief I further understand that additional in/ormabon may be n Q to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ - t~ Date December 21" 2005 Signatu2 Tdle Charlie Bu uet Associate ~IC ~F ~ ~G • ' iI I Id. r `1 M Q~Fa }k~ ) ~ ~', ~~ r~ `~ Q':_ I f r.. .p 1 re 1''.;I 'pI W '`II ~yC ~I'.s. 1{16f lgt ~~ ., '~~ = O W al `v/ I ~ ~~ 1`4'rru)'"w',~ M ~ •. ~•+.._ :i :.. V (• 4~i- y~~~ 11 ' i 1 ~ ~ ~ 1N o u~ ~ 1~+ ~ ~' .J ~ E ^~~ .. _M~- •`.v i ~ rI.Y jaoo oa~~ . `' . ~ A I- ul i ~ ~ ~ ~r ,+Y'- i u a9 U N~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ atrNaa ~ A~ q 3. '~~~ ~~ i 1 a~~`{ ~ l.~\ ~ ~f R' i~: % ~~ ~ I~.~:S.1 v _ _ ` I '~__ I __ _ ~ ] u i' ~ t•la J ~ ua Y ~ `ONdRJ'l' c .ay~_ _ _ .__ _ -. _,_,_ .. O. Z ~~ .)_~•\ •.;'! c ~ ~~', ~ •v° it ~`i~~' t "~ 0 0 N' r• \ ~ =x ~ - rryC'. ~ '.U. rgzr:l ~ ;~u Z ~ I ~J~_~ I ~L I _ • ~ ~t~~~ 1 q--~ • ~ f i I-r xi ~k.. 1 I 1 ~ 1 '__- l - ~ ~- _J^_d _a_J1}Imiy~,.~ - _ -t ~%~ '!_~ 16-0 ^ R P •1 IN it ~. - Nq- IUNVMLL)/ _ r^~ a 1 ~~ ~~I ~ i g Ib 3 1 •1 c ~II ~g ~` ~~~•~~ I 4 ~ 1. ~p i 1~ u \ ~2 . . p - _ - f~ ~ I ' ~ ~ ~~ ~ _ ~~~-~-- - ICI ~~) _ LL ~I ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ __ - 1 ~~ ~~ - _-_ -~ - - ~ I_~ I' _ I ~_ .I ~ ~ ~~ ~ 1' ~ , .~ ~ ~. ~ ~~ c ~ `4 -I ..Ratak ~ ~ RngT _ __ _ =_a`IS:.-•-• = i~ - - _' ~ -_ -_ - - b _ mo 'y~ .~r` '~ f~ ,~"r~,~~,~~- I it fl ~1 ~ ~ I 0 l ~ ~ i~`s~.,,~..~ 21 ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ - I ~ ~ ~ ~ I a • i ' ~ .~I• ~~ 3A< ~ ~ ` a3lalHUJ~ ~ ~~\r ~ 1 I ~ S ( I K_ ~ a!' ~ ~~ - ~ ~ ~ ~' ,I ~ 11C ~I ~ I { I ~ 1 9e. 1 I 6 s_ _I ~ ~ 1 r ~ k ~ / y 0 1 " 1 .1 i I I - ~~ a ~~5 . ~ G ~ I~;S I _ _~~ rcY ~~i ~ ~ ,I 1 • - - • W tnoows Ltve Local ~~" Windows Live Local 11929 Foothill Boulevard Rancho Cuca ~, ~-~icrcr t, Virtual Earth BEt2 What Business name or category Where. Address, nty, or other place .f Welcome Scrat th Pad Locate Me Pemnahnk Add Pusholn Dirertinnc _ ~'\ J N Page 1 of 1 iunlty Help About ^nrar+; SCRATCH PAD clear ~ email ~ 61o~it~ t 11929 Foothill BI Rancho Cucamor CA 91730 ~.. ~,~ ~~~ ,~. ,~otMlae.ar~ ocw httn //local Irve coin/ - - - - _ = 2/15/2006 ~°'~~ ~~ ~I „ , • I ~g~~~g I I ° S 8 4~ ~ ., ° ; S II II ~ Q „ , , „ ~ § 6 ~ ~ gg f' W ~ i Nq 2 ~ f ~ F j ~ s .. w , < ~ 1 6 W O q I H ~I i . P > ~~ a~~ II " ~ ~i 6 , ~ gg b B „ o II 7 o~~ w N05103 YINa03f7YJ Ni13HLH05 r Bq H : 6 N Y I .. ' ~€ ~ 3Na0 dOSAH - ~~ 9 5 q ' g i i § § ' q § G ~ ~ f q q v. § q 9 ~ d ~ I 5 § ° q § Oa l3NN o 'g ~ a w I 6 6 q § 9 9 ti ='I ~ Q g ~ 9 9 § w 9 O W ~ _ vt'i 9 , c $ § N 9 ! § $ a g § § ~~ U 9 § § ~ a = ~ s • a • • w ~ q 9 4 § 9 q § pq oti a i N 29 K g _ LL O i L § ~ i • w I I 311N31tl a3I53HJ0a . ~ 9 _ I 4 g ! ~ § § § § • ~ i __ ~ ~ § i I § ~ § , N I I § § M M § / i I ' ~ ' § - ~Z- I § - § I o -' N 7 ~ z 3 ! i j ~~_ 3r aaa mm „I 11 . ' _J ' ~ - , I ;- I --- ,I - - --~ - I I - - - ~ ,. ' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~3 « ` , + S RR _W ~ I I . I I ~ i T i ~ W I f ` r ~ Regional Related ~ ~ ~ Y > Commercial i j - - - - - ~.7dxY lCa V. CiM173 I ~ i L ~____--__-- I -_--_- -"-- - -- c^- ` r Open Space ~ ~ I ~ s ~: >,,,~I„ ,I~~z ~ II It9 ~.r I~~I~1, ; ~ I ! Open:Space w ~' h R v; I ~ g s ~C` L ~` a ~ ' « R ' .~~ I ~' f ~ g -~-~~= ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~-~ _ ~-: ; ~, _ • ~,II ~- ~ ~ N, ; r ~-. ~ g g y 1 ~ t n 1 ~ ~~ ~ _ ~ t__ \3 ~ ~ ~~ 'i f I a y 3 pe p e f _ ~ _-- - _ __- ,: : ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ - __ ~ _~~ ~ , , ~ ~w _ _ +~ I t 4 ~ ~ - ~ ' c. I F R ~ c ` - I I _ :, R , 7 I y I l_ry I I y i 3 IF~I`4 v n I ~ IJ I 1~ 4 ~~~"""111 ~ ~, ~ c I I ~-1 _ ..r _ _ _r_ 'T'om ~ b i R T j r / 5 I I 1 I f ` i j ' J, I - -- --, -- . - ---- ~ ~; II ___ _7. _ - __ -Iti~ Rr 2153HCJ8.~_____ _-- _ _ __ __~_~ ___~__ _.____ ___-___~ i~~~~ R--1 ~ i ~ ~9- ~ - i ~ ~C • '~ n I i ~ ~ { I i enj~A Rf I ig I ^' 'U I ! i i~ ~ - "v I 1 Vj d I g 1 I z'~ p 1 ~~ i i l f I <. ~U U ~~-~ _ ~ _x_11-- ~ i ~ ~~ ~ ,I - ,,,. - - ~^ ~ ~ ; ~1 ~ i 1 A~ ` ~,~ E I / -~ ~' 1 ~ 4 j.-G I r • J ~ -_ ; , ___-__ ____ --~_ _ i I ~ ~ i . ~ I , ' i ~ ~ ~ 1 I i % • -~-z- ~-I i `~--- I---- ~ f '' ~'7 I j~~~, 1 v /. RR • 1{' u ~ ' ~ € ~ i m°. I t, - ~ ` ~~~~ ~ ~ O ~ o ~ d~~ a9 ~ ~ I ~ ~- I 4 S AC j [. I I ~ "s9 ._ ~ > ~ ~ ' ~ i 1 ~ g o 1 ~ = ~ t Y ~ ~ ' s o q _ ~ I p i N C t o I I I ~ _ i ~ I z `-~ ' ~ , o V ~i ® ~. . R 1 I ' O • 0 I I I ' __ o 0 i O Q ~ p-„ 3a F I I ' ~ I j i O l i e•a I / ~ , l I ~(q~-~ (J I~7lY IY lZ ° ~ 0 O { 0 ` ~ ' R8 8 R ~ ~~ - o i o ~ __ _ _ _ I ' ° ~ ° j' . ~ n ° 1 / k' I j j ~ i o f o 0 o f ® ~ () \l ~JI yy I ' o ° 1\ I j ~ n i I o t ° ~ ~~ ~ I V I ~ gl 4g ~ V i i ^ l - i I ' ° / g ' I ~ a ~ / 6 ~' I j ~" a y °~ + ~ I I ~ ° 1 $ 1 I , b ,.. ,g ., o I l ' I ~ ~ c4 _ \ ~ ° O l ~ y ° i I II , ~ I I o0 0 Oi 0 ' ~ I I i I ° ° q I' , j °' ° ~~i ~ 2 - n 1 -- ~ I . I E i ~ W 1 . : ~~ » ~ \ .. ~» ~ I j ~ ~ _ n / -~ \ o o I j F : ° ° d: ~ I ' ! t ~ _ = , o ~ ~ ~ - ~i i m- h 1 1 I I -' ~ I j ~ ~ __ ~ ~ I ' ~ ~ I j N I ~ °_ / 1 o ~ ~ j "O: ~~5g / /I 1 IB _ +~~ I I i ~ I ~C t. 0 - r- ~C~ ~ I ° o _ -- ' . y 1 '~ M - _ - _ -_ _. _ I' _II ~.-_- I ' I ____ _ _ - . I___. _ti_-__ __ - City of Rancho Cucamohga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND Project Files. DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, pRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, and DRC2005-01124 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2005-01000 - 'CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to amend the General Plan Circulation Element to allow a median break on Foothill Boulevard approximately 1,000 feet east of the intersection of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard for the purposes of permitting a signalized intersection that will be located less than the standard 1,320 feet intersection spacing requuem~nt GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2005-01006 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to change the land use designation from Office to Community Commercial on 8 21 acres of land (Subarea 4) within the Foothill Boulevard Districts, located at the northeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue -APN 0227-152-18 and 31. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005-01002 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to change the Development District Designation from Office to Community Commercial on 8 21 acres of land (Subarea 4) within the Foothill Boulevard Districts, located aY the northeast • corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue -APN 0227-152-18 and 31 , DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2005-01003 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - ~ A request to amend the Community Commercial Distract land use regulations within Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts to add hotels, motgls and major hotel faalities as a Conditionally Permitted Use and cocktail lounges within major hotel facilities as a Conditionally permitted Use . TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17594 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to subdivide 8 21 acres of land into 6 parcels for commercial purposes in the Office Professional Distract, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue - APN 0227-152-18 and 31 ' CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-00365 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -The development of a master plan for an office and commercial center consisting of a 112 room hotel, two restaurant pad buldings totaling 10,893 square feet, atwo-story office and retail budding totaling 46,000 square feet, a bank and office building totaling 6,583 square feet and gas station with convenience store and food court totaling 8,189 square feet on 821 acres of land in the Community Commercial District (Subarea 4) within the Foothill Boulevard Distracts, located at the northeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue -APN 0227-152-18 and 31 VARIANCE DRC2005-01124 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to allow a maximum building height of 55 feet where a maximum bwldmg height of 45 feet is allowed for the development of a master plan for an office and commercial center consisting of a 112 room hotel, two restaurant pad buildings totaling 10,893 square feet, atwo-story office and retail building totaling 46,000 square feet, a bank and office building totaling 6,583 square feet and gas station with convenience store and food court totaling 8,189 square feet on 8 21 acres of land m the Community Commercial District (Subarea 4) within the Foothill Boulevard Districts, located at the • northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue -APN 0227-152-18 and 31 V~~= - ~~P r~ LJ ~'~1' I i ~ 'I ~ i Initial Study for ~ City of~ Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01iQ02, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, pRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Page 2 2. Related Files: Preliminary Review DF~~C2004-00874 '~ ii 3. Description of Project. The protect entails the development o6 a master plan for an office and commercial center consisting of a hotel, two restaurant pad buildings, atwo-story office ¢uilding, a bank and office building, and a gas station with convenience store and food court at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue To facilitate the proposed protect, a number of entitlements are required, including a change to the General Plan land use designation and Development District designations for the two existing parcels that currently comprise the site, and approval of a parcel map to create six new separate parcels The protect also includes a Development Code Amendment to amend the Commurnty Commercial District hand use regulations within Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard''Districts to add a hotels, motels and mator hotel facilities as a Conditionally Permitted Use and cocktail lounges within mator hotel facilities as a Conditionally Permitted Use A General Plan Amendment to allow a median break on Foothill Boulevard less than 1/4 mile intersection spacing requirement is also being requested '' The following table is a summary description of the current land use designations and uses and a breakdown of ,the other elements of the protect ~~ Current Land Use Designations and Development ~- Existing ~' APN _ Lot Area Existing General Plan Desi nation r Existing ' ' Zoning Desl nation ~ Exlstlng Use= ` • - _ _ ~ T Vacant LaiSd 0227-152-18 5 45ac ~ Office Office (Subarea 4) Foothill' Boulevard Districts Vacant Lr1nd 0227-152-31 2 75 ac Office Office (Subarea 4) Foothill Boulevard ' Districts To permit the proposed protect consisting of a hotel, office, retail, bank, and service station with convenience store, the current land use designations and development district designations must be amended to a land use designation that allows for hotel and retail development. Concurrent with the General Plan and Development District legislative entitlements, the applicant has submitted a parcel map to create six parcels The proposed lot sizes and their new land use designations are summarized in the following table • ~~~ - ~~ Rev 4/20/05 Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-Oi003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Page 3 Tentative Lot Proposed General Proposed Zoning Proposed Future Parcel Map Area Plan Designation Designatlor-,~ Uas1~ 17594, - + , Parcet, n ' ' ' , - Number • - ° ' ~ 4 ° '-, - ' Community Commercial Community Commercial BanWOffice 1 ~ 83 ac ' (Subarea 4) Foothdl+ Boulevard Distracts Community Cammemial Community Commercial ~~ Stahon and 2 1 33 ac ' (Subarea 4) Foothill with Food Court Boulevard Distracts Community Commercial Community Commercial ~~ and Retail 3 2 16 ac (Subarea 4) Foothill Boulevard Distracts Community Commercial Community Commercial Restaurant 4 79 ac (Subarea 4) Foothill Boulevard Distracts Community Commercial Community Commercial Restaurant 5 83 ac (Subarea 4) Foothill Boulevard Distracts Community Commercial Community Commeraal Hotel ; 6 2 06 ac (Subarea 4) Foothill , Boulevard Distracts 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Charles Joseph Associates 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 395 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5. General Plan Designation: The present General Plan Designation is Office. The protect proposes changing the General Plan Designation to Community Commercial 6. Zoning: The present Development Distract Designation is Office (Subarea 4) Foothill Boulevard' Districts The protect proposes changing the Development District Designation to Community Commeraal 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The protect site is located at the northeast comer of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard The site is presently vacant with sparse vegetation and weeds covering the matority of the site The site has evidence of discing for weed abatement purposes No buildings occupy the protect site To the north is asingle-family neighborhood, and to the west, across Rochester Avenue, are the Spaghetti Factory restaurant, Home Depot, and other retail uses To the south, across Foothill Boulevard, is predominantly vacant land with one single-family residence (i e , Aggazzotti Winery, a Designated Point of Interest). To the east is an Edison Power Line Corridor 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Donald Granger, Associate Planner ~ C~.-_ ~ (909) 477-2750 t r Rev 4/20/05 C~ i n I~ ~~i' ~I • r1 LJ Initial Study for ~~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01Q~02, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, QRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Page 4 10. Other agencies whose approval pis required (e g., permits, imancing approval, 'or participation agreement7. None. ~~ GLOSSARY -The tollowing abbreviations are used in this report. CVW D -Cucamonga Valley Water Distnct ~ ~ ~~ EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmg~tal Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases ~~ PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter „ RWQCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board " SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District SW PPP-Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G - Urbdh Emissions Mode17G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ~~„ The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a +~Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the iollowmg pages , (/) Aesthetics ()Biological Resources , ()Hazards & Waste Materials OMineral Resources ()Public Services ()Utilities & Service Systems (/) AgnculturatResources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Hydrology & Water Quality (/) Noise ' ()Recreation (/) Mandatory Findings of (/) Air Quality , (/) Geology & Soils ()Land Use & Planning (/) Population & Housing (/) Transportation/Traffic DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (/) I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the protect have been made by, or agreed to, by the protect proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared Prepared By Date ® o Reviewed By ~! Date 2 t~C~= -~q Rev 4/20/05 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC200`r01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC20o5 01124 Paoe 5 Lau Tnoa 9grvfiW,1 Lsaf Issues and Supporting Information Sources Poiannalty 9gnificant WM M~fi~on Tsui sp.nc.m w ~ i~ ib ~ ~ EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the protect: a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vista? O O O (~) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (~) not hmrted to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () (~) ( ) quality of the site and its surroundmgs~ d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () (~) () ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area r~ Comments• a) There are no signficant vistas within or adtacent to the protect site The site ~ not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 b) The protect site contains no scenic resources and no historic bwldmgs within a State • Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga ' The Foothill Boulevard Distract calls fora 14-foot wide raised landscape median As noted in the above protect descriptions, the protect is concurrently applying for a General Plan Amendment to allow a signalized intersection less than the standard 1/4 mile spaang Since the protect proposes median break less than standard 1/4 mde spacing, the protect will result m the loss of approximately 400 feet of landscape median The nearest existing ,. median break occurs approximately 660 feet or 1/8 mile east of the proposed median break With the proposed protect, there will be two median breaks between Rochester Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard The distance between Rochester Avenue aid Day Creek Boulevard is approximately 2,400 feet, 240 feet less than a 1/2 mile. The two median breaks less will cumulatively result m a loss of lust over 1/8 mile of landscaping The loss of the landscaping for the median breaks, as analyzed from the total lineal distance between Rochester Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard, is considered to be less-than-significant c) The protect site is located at the northeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard The site is presently vacant with sparse vegetation and weeds covering the matority of the site The site has evidence of discing for weed abatement purposes No buildings occupy the protect site To the north is asingle-family neighborhood; and, to the west, across Rochester Avenue, is the Spaghetti Factory restaurant, Home Depot and other retail uses To the south, across Foothill Boulevard, is predominantly vacant land with one single family residence (i e , Aggazzotti Winery, a Designated Point of Interest) To the east is an Edison Power Line Corridor The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this protect Design Review ~s regwred prior to approval City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities . to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution ~ ~~~ _ g~ Rev 4/20/05 ~ t Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC20o5-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2 Paae 65 • AND DRC2005 01124 Less marl ~ ' Sigmficent Less Potenoelly H'~fi T^e^ . Issues and Supporting Information Sources Si9~acte~ Irco ~fi ed &Cnfica~~ ' ' Nu ' d) The protect would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the wh chdrequ re review for conlsistency with Ctytstandards thatsrequibes sh eld rig, diftusl rig, or xldvect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of dlum~nation to within the protect site , A photometric diagram should be.requued,at plan check to demonstrate that all illumination levels will meet or exceed the Citys allowable foot candle requirements and not cause glare on the residential uses to the north The following mitigation will reduce the impact to aless-than-significant level ~) A Photometric diagram shall b'e submitted and approved prior to Building Permit issuance demonstrating that illumination from the project is confined within the project's boundarle's and meets the City's foot candle requirements. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect ~ ' a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (~) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the • Farmland Mapping and Momtonng Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () (') (~) Williamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (~) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments: a) The site is ndt designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is presently vacant with sparse vegetation and weeds covering the majority of the site The site has evidence of discing for weed abatement purposes There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-thud is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan and1eeastern hport olns cof courratCli~ °hateSis ncharacter zeds bye exist rig (nand planhned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland m the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of prolectis9 ons stentrwi h the GeneralaPlan forowhiohbhe FE Rltwasoprepared and impacts evaluated • b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City ~ C ~ - ~\ Rev 4/20/05 Irntial Study for '~ ~ City of,Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01Q02, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, 4RC2005-00365, AND DRC2005 01124 Pd4e 7 Lass rn~ i $,prxficeni Leu I ' Issues and Supporting Information Sources PMem,allY Sgn,ficant With MNpaoon Then Siprufitenl No ~ C Inco rete0 I act I ecl c) The site is located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north and an Edison Transmission corridor to the east The hearest~agriculiural use, a landscape nursery and a small remnant vineyard, is located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, approximately an 1/8 of a mile southe;3st of the site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated 3. AIR DUALITY. Would the pro/ect a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () ('~) applicable air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or' contrbutQ O (/) O ( ) substantially to an existing or protected air quality violations ~ ' c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () () (~) any cri4eria pollutant for which the protect region is non-attainment under an applicable,Federal or State ambient au quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors ' d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ' () (/) () ( ) concentrauons~ e) Create obtectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (~) number of people Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a 'significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated • • b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAOMD) on a • protect-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels i~C-F ~Z Rev 4/20/05 • Initial Study for ~~ ~ City of~Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01Qp2, DRC2005.01003, SUBTPM17594, QRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005 01124 Page 8 Lass Then 1 sigmncant Less ~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources Po+annally slgnncam With ~ Mn,gaton Than signnaam No I C Into a,eE I act I ect " 1) All construction equipment shall be maiFitained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall, ensure that all constru¢tion equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per " manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. ' ~ ~, 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading, Permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that ~' ' low-erpission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect. Contractors shall ,also conform to any constructiommeasures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAGIMD) as well as City Planning~Staf(. ~ I~' 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted In SCAQMD Rule 1108. , • 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAGMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall mclude~'the following provisions: I I • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material m accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. • 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWoCB]) daily to reduce Fme Particulate Matter (PMtg) emissions, In accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. ~ C' F Rev 4/20/05 ` ~ 3 ~' Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-Oj003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Peon 9 Less Then Sipruficant ~w Isspes and Supporting Information Sources P°'°^aai~Y SipruM1Cer~t wnn Mitipanon ,n,n STM1°Y11 No I act Into nq I I 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWaCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain Inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMip emissions. S) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean ;altematlve fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not In use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nitrogen Oxides (Nox), Reactive Organic Gases (ROG), and Fine Particulate Matter (PMio) would exceed SCAOMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant The General Plan FEIR idflntifibd the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. r 1 LJ In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant • operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively sign`ficant rf they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., In excess of 10 minutes). 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules In conspicuous areas. 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to Incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to Incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR • identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council ~r C''F V y Rev 4/20/05 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-010p2, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005 01124 Peae 10 Less Then I ' SigniM1Cent Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g P~~M1eny 99nficent WM MmgeDOn Tnen S,pnM1Cent No 1 In<o teO ~ 1 I c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR'identified the etywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect 'proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. ' d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAOMD identifies the following as senstive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilitiQS According to the SCAOMD, protects have, the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAOMp~ Rule 1401 According to the SCA~MD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air cdntaminants identified in SCAOMD Rule ' 1401 The protect site is adtoining nearest sensitive receptors, single-family residences, to the north The mitigation meas>rres listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels • e) Typically modern service stations (with gasoline sales only, no auto repair), office buildings, business retail, hotels, and restaurants do not create obtectionable odors The service station, located at the corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, is located over 200 feet from the nearest single-family residences No adverse impacts are anticipated • 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect~ a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (~) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, pollees, or regulations, or by the Califoma Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (~) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (~) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites Rev 4/20/05 Initial Study for ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01P02, DRC2005.01003, SUBTPM17594, PRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Pao2 11 ' Lass Then 99nificent Less ~ ' Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Pmanoeur Sgnificam wnn ~ MNge9on men Spuficant No e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances O O O (/) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinances ' f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ~ () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural'Community conservation ~~ Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State , habitat conservation plans Comments: a) The protect'site is located in an area developed with retail and residential uses To the north is an existing single-family neighbgrhood, and to east is an Edison Transmission corridor To the west, across Rochester Avenue, Is a Home Depot, festaurant, and automotive repair The site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and annual discing for weed abatement Acoording to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of'sensitive biological resources, therefore, development wdl not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The protect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities , No riparian • habitat exists bn-site, meaning the protect will not have any impacts i c) No wetland habitat is present on-site As a result, protect implementation would have no impact on these resources , d) The matority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are no trees, small or heritage size, on the protect site, therefore, the proposed protect is not in conflict with any local ordinance f) The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES Would the pro/ect a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ ' b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries • Rev 4/20/05 ~ C ~- ^ g • Initial Study for ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005.01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-010p2, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005 01124 Raae 12 Less Then ~ ' Sprvfioant less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g 'Pelant1e~~Y S,on~ficant vino Miep840n Than Siq,vficant No I ect Inco r•teo 1 ~ I C Comments: a) Thy project sde, has not been identrfied ps a "Hlstonc Resource' per fhe standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Hlstonc Preservation) There are no structures on the project site There will be no impact b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 511). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and'potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: , • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or • significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish Its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions' to require Incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CE~A guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center (or permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the profect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The project site is underlain by quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, • the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to O ~~' - ~ ~7 Rev 4/20/05 I,) , I Initial Study for ~ Crty of, Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005~01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01P02, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, PRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005 01124 PBae 13 Lass man I Sigrvficent Less I Issues and Supporting Information Sources baantielly SiprvGCant wltn ~ M~epason man 9gnficara No I ad Inco taa I I monitor construction activities,'to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that wilLalso provide specific rdcommendaUons regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the prdgram must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: I • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth,disturbmg activities. , • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery', the grading contractor should immAdiately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (I.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected • specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed prolect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The prolect site has already been disrupted by surrounding developments and annual discing for weed abatement No known religious or sacred sites exist within the prolect area. No evidence is in place to suggest the prolect site has been used for human bunals. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that ~ human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is requred in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site No adverse impacts are anticipated 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the pro/ect• a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving Q Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (~) delineated on the most recent Algwst-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shakmg~ O O O (~) w) Seismic-related ground failure, including O O O (~) Ilquefaction~ u Rev 4/20/05 ~ `~ tr i I,4)i I , II I ' n U ' ~, Indial Study for °~~ ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01gQ2, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, gRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005 01124 Paoe 14 lass Tfian I , ~~ S,9^~hcant, Less I Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g FtttenYally SiQfi,hcant wpm Mmpaoon man Sipmficant No I act Inco ted I d I act iv) Landslides ~ ~ O O O (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the los$ of topsoils () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () ~ () () (/) or that would become unstable as a result of the ' ~ protect, and potentially result in on- or 'bff-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction , or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (/) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial asks to Ilfe or property e) Have 'soils incapable of adequately supporting the use' () () „() (/) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not 'available for the disposal of wastewater Comments: ,~ a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Spebial Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the • General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5 1 of the General Plan FEIR The ked Hill Fault, passes within 2 miles north of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 4 miles north of the protect site These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to M„, 7 5 earthquakes, is located approximately 13 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to M„, 8 2 earthquakes, is located approximately 15 miles northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-signrficant b) The proposed protect will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site sails The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RW~CB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCA~MD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping' as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil • off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the sit(e~during such episodes. Rev 4/20/05 ~tE~ U „ , Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 P.aa2 15 Lana Tian SiOnd~carit Lsa Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g amam~allr SiOmRCant wnn Mnipaaon rn.n au,.nwa IJo I R Into teE I ~ I 4) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCA~MD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions' c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 51),indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The protect would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR figure 51-2 Soil types on-site consist of Tutunga loamy sand soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The matority of Rancho Cucamdnga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of sods are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Tutunga loamy sand soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 Runoff for Tutunga soils is slow to very slow, with slopes ranging from 0 percent to 5 percent No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The protect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the pro/ect a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, O O O (/) would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area g) Impair implementation of or physically intertere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plats u n LJ n U Rev 4/20/05 `i~C-t`t-~ l ', Initial Study for ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-010p2, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005 01124 Peae 16 Lass man ~ ' sipnihcan, Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pgienaany si0niatan, won rn,uoeaw roan S~gnncani He ~ act Inca a,e0 ~ 1 en h) Expose people or structures to a signifcant ns(C of O O O (~) loss, ~ntury or death invoiwng wildland fires, including where wildland~ are adtacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ , Comments: a) The protect, specifically the gas station, will involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in'the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are expected ' b) The proposed protect, specifically the gas station, does include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The protect includes a service station that will store underground fuel tanks housing automobile fuel Both the pump island and the underground fuel tanks will be,regwred to meet the Federal and State requirements • regarding fuel containment should a spill occur The County of San Bernardino Fire District conducts annual inspections of the underground tanks to ensure compliance with Fire Codes The City particpates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergences Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are anticipated c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the protect site The protect site is located within 1 mile of the nearest existing or proposed school Typically, the uses proposed (office, retail, hotel, restaurant, and service station) do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The proposed protect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials There are no structures on-site that will regwre demolition No impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an Avport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 mtles of a public airport Protect site is located approximately 4 miles northeasterly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated • f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract in the event of Rev 4/20/05 ~ C ~ - a ~ ~ I,) ,~ Irntial Study for ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005~01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, QRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005 01124 Paa2 17 Less Than I Siprvficanl Less ~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources Falenfieily sipnihcent wpm ~ MiLpaam man $,gMfiunt No I an Inco rateE I I gel a disaster Because the protect includes atleast two points of public street access and is regwred to comply with all applicable Cary codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest, ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Intertace area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fite Distract Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed protect site is not located within a,high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project a) Violate any water quality standards or watte discharge () (/) () ( ) regwrements~ b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (/) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g., the production rate of pre-existing neAtby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ~ () () () (/) the site or area, including through the alteration of course of a stream or aver, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () ~ () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (/) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () (/) () ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (/) that would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp ~) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (/) 7C~ F - ~ 2 • C~ Rev 4/20/05 n U 1 Initial Study for ~~~ ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01Q02, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, pRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005 01124 Paae 1 S Less Than i ~ ' Signif¢agt ~ Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Fgtennally Si nifiwnt with Miapa6on Then Sipn,fitant No 1 act Inco rateC I act 1 acr Comments• a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water'District (CVWD) The prolect is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems The State of, California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water /Vct The , General Construction Permit treats any Construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial' , activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit ThA State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board , (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits C~ Construction activities covered under they State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment Prior to commencement of construction of a protect, 'a discharger must submit a Nonce of "Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit The General permit regwres all dyschar®ers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading ,~ Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping ell products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other i waters of the nation Perform inspections of all BMPs Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction prolect discharges A construction„prolect for new development or significant redevelopment regwres an NPDES permit Construction prolect proponents are required to prepare a SWPPP To comply with the NPDES, the prolect construction contractor will be required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Associate Engineers, June 9, 2005, that identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surtaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods Structural controls used to manage storrn water pollutant levels include detention basins, oiVgrit separators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing Erosion and Sediment Control Plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent • Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, nnStorm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Rev 4/20/05 ~ ~ ~ `T Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005.01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Pea@ 19 Lev men S'pnfitenl leea Issues and Supporting Information Sources Soh °~;,; M,i~aem S; ~,„ n, ~ ~, ~~ ~~ ~ (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollu'jants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in Gr$ding Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activJties are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall Include the following measures at a minimum: a) Speeffy the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. • 4) Durng construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construchon OperaUOnal 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs Identified In the Water l]uality Management Plan prepared by Associated Engineers, June 9, 2005, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6), Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbic)des. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans (or these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the Clty for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7) Ponding areas on the south side of the project are depressed to promote the retention and infiltration of treated runoff and Irrigation water. 8) Rooftops drain to landscaping prior to entering the storm drain system. 9) Collection inlets provided with trash guard grate. 10) Rinker Stormcepter installed to treat water before entering Infiltration area. b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from ground • water in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVN/D has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area Rev 4/20/05 ~` [ ~ ~~ i ~~+ II ~ • Initial Study for "~ ~~ ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-011Q02, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, ,DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005 01124 Paae 20 ' Lass man ~~ Sprv6cart Lass II Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potenaaily Sign,fiwnt Wrth Mrtipaaon man Significant No I act Inro ratted I act I eh designated as a recharge bash or spreading grdund according to General Plan Exhibit , IV-2 The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued ' development citywide will increase water needs and "is a significant impact, however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water faahties c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and'the rate and " ' amount of surtace water runoff becau,~e of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A Grading and Dr,~inage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, the protect will not result (n substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered signrficant d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape . proposed on a site, however, the protect will not after the course ~of any stream or river All runoff wiil•be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated. e) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer pnor to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surtace flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is for new development or significant redevelopment, therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 71) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WIMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain • system to the maximum extent practicable. The WCMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2`~004C~ ~ 5 i Rev 4/20/05 Irntial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Paae 21 Law Thin S,pnGCarn LW Iss es and Su ortin Information Sources 4 PP 9 'Pma""~~Y s~vn~vicem vim, M,ovaeon tn.n s,y.n~.nt ' w I act Into tb I ~ 1 12) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Ehmmation System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e.,,a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identl(ication Number) shall be submitted to the CIty~Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. , g) No housing units are proposed with this prolect No adverse impacts are expected. h) The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive stone drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debrs dams and levees north of the City, spreadmg grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6. The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are~expected I) There are no oceans, lakes or reservoirs near the prolect site, therefore,lmpacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sds at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreadmg grounds both wdhm and north of the City 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the prolect• a) Physically divide an established commumty~ () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the prolect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () () () (/) or natural community conservation plan Comments• a) The prolect will not physically divide an established community because the residential neighborhood to the north will not change and no new public streets are proposed The site is located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north, and an Edison Transmission corridor to the east To the west, across Rochester Avenue, is the Spaghetti Factory, Home Depot, and other retail uses To the south, across Foothill Boulevard, is vacant land and the Aggazzotti Winery, a Designated Point of Interest Rev 4/20/05 D ~ , ~ ~ G • • ', Initial Study for ~ City of~Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01Q02, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Peae 22 ' Lea Tian 1 ~ 9prcfitarlt Lea Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Fotenuelly Sipml~cegt WM Miapaaon TTen &pnhcanl Na I act IMO rateE 1 en ~ I act b) The prolect entails the development of a master plan for an office and commercial center consisting of a hotel, two restaurant pad buildings; atwo-story office building, a bank and office building and a gas station with convenience store and food court at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue To facilitate the proposed prolect, a number of entitlements are required including a change to the General Plan land use designation and Development District desigrtabons for the two existing parcels that ' currently comprise the site, and approval of a parcel map to create six new separate parcels The prolect requires a General Plan Amendment and Development District Amendment to change the land use designation from Office to Community Commercial ' The prolect 'also includes a Development Code Amendment to amend the Community Commercial District land use regulations within Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts to add a hotels, motels and major hotel facilities as a Conditionally Permitted Use and cocktail lounges within major ~ptel facilities as a Conditionally Permitted Use A General Plan Amendment to allow a median break on Foothill Boulevard less than 1/4 mile intersection spacing requirement is also being requested. This prolect will be of ' ~ similar design and size to the two nearby commercial developments located ~at the southwest and northwest corners at Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue. The prolect Site Plan has been designed to reduce impacts to aless-than-significant level through the City's The prolect site land use designation is office To facilitate the proposed master-planned prolect, a number oT entitlements are required including a change to the General Plan land use designation and Development Distract designations for the two existing parcels that currently comprise the site The prolect requires a General Plan Amendment and Development District Amendment to change the land use designation ,from Office to Community Commercial As part of the legislative amendment process for the General Plan and Development District Designation changes that are proposed, the City will determine whether the changes are appropriate for the site in question and that the changes will more effectively implement the General Plan goals and objectives. If approved, subsequent development and use of the site will also be required to be consistent with the General Plan, the Development Code, and the policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The prolect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the prolect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan • 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect. a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Rev 4/20/05 ~C~ " Q~ Initial Study for " City of, Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, ~7RC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 ' Peae 23 t~ man 1 Sprufica,a Leaa ~ Iss es and Su ortin Information Sources y PP g ~°'ante1y Sgnifican "'"" ' Mingaoan '"'" Sgnficant No ' I n Into tae I I n Comments• a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1,'therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plani Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a,valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact 11. NOISE. Would the pro/ect result in. a) Exposure of,persons to or generation of noise levels in U (/) ~ O ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? cj A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () ~ (/) levels in the protect vicinity abovA' levels existing without the protect d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in O (/) O ( ) ambient noise levels in the protect vicinity above levels , existing without the protect e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (/) would the protect expose people residing or working in the. protect area to excessive noise levels Comments. a) The protect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out The protect site will be exposed to exterior traffic noise levels greater than 65 dBA within 429 feet of Foothill Boulevard, and greater than 65dBA within 108 feet of Rochester Avenue Since the protect includes a 107 room hotel that will provide temporary lodging facilities, an acoustical analysis of the protect site was completed by Dary & Associates, Inc With the use of standard construction practices and all south facing windows and glass doors utilizing STC32 glazing, the rental rooms in the hotel will meet the City's interior acoustical requirements of 40dBA The study recommends that a final acoustical analysis be completed at the time Building Permits are applied for in order to analyze any necessary building upgrades including, but not limited to, upgraded exterior windows • The protect has been designed so that the office, retail, bank, and hotel uses are plotted to provide a sound buffer from the more intensive service station and restaurant land • uses Also, is designed so that the bank, office/retail and hotel buildings have been plotted at significant distance from the single-family residences to the north The bank, ~~~"~~3 Rev 4/20/05 I'~i' II A n U ~, Indial Study for '" ~ ~~ Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-011Q02, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594„DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Page 24 Lass Tfien ~ ~~ Sipndicent Less ~ Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g FotenUally ~9n'fi~ant wan ~ MNpehon man Siprvfitant No I act Into ta0 I ad I act office/retail, and hotel buildings are located betwe2~n 80-100 feet from the north property of the protect that is the boundary line between the nearest single-family rQsidences and the commercial protect The mitigation measures listed below would reduce, exterior and interior noise levels to less-than-significant levels 1) Exterior: An 8-foot high masonry wdll shall be constructed along tote north property line inrorder to provide a sound attenuation and privacy, between the single-family dwelling units to the north and the protect ,I ~ 2) Interior: All south facing windpws and glass doors in the hotel building shall ha e n STC rating of 32 or greater. 3) ~A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuQnce of Building Permits. The final report shall discuss the level of Interior noise attenuation to below 40 dBA for the hotel r,Qoms, the building materials, and cohstruction techniques required. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. ~~ b) The uses associated with this type of protect (office, services station with no auto repair, • restaurant, retail and hotel) normally do not induce ground borne vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the protect , d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 4) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m: on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 5) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. • 6) The perimeter block wall along the north property line shall be constructed as early as possible. ~ ' ~ I~ , (~ Rev 4/20/05 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005 01124 P.eae 25 ' Lass Then $ipruhcenl Lea Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 v~en"a~lY &pnficant wnn Miopaoan TMn ypnhunt Np ' I aq' I led I The preceding mitigation measures well reduce the disturbance created by 'on-site construction equipment, however, do not addres§ the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be required 7) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, Including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday ,or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would e>tceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The protect is located approximately 4 miles northeasterly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 21/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the protect a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () (~) ( ) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (`~) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (~) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments• a) The protect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area Also, it is anticipated that following construction a matonty of the employees working at the protect site will likely be hired from within the City or the surrounding communities Additionally, Rancho Cucamonga is presently one of the 10 fastest growing cities in the United States The City is presently experiencing a construction boom that is generating new housing stock of all types (apartments, single-family dwelling units, condos, and town homes) The impact is considered to be less-than-significant No adverse impact expected b) The protect site contains no existing housing units and will involve the demolition of any structures No adverse impact expected f' 1 U c) The protect site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated • IJ, C, ' ~-1 a ~ Rev 4/20/05 °), , Initial Study for City of~Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01Q02, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Raae 26 Less Than S,grvLCant Less ~ Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g P~~anaanr Slprvfitgnt mm A4Gpaoan roan SgrvM1Cani No I ect loco te0 i ~ 1 13. PUBLIC SERVICES Would the protect result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated wdh the provision of new ' or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause sigm6cant environmental impacts, in, order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other per/ormance obfectives for any of the public services a) Fire protections O U O (~) b) Police protecUOn~ ' O O O (~) c) Schogls~ O O O ('~) d) Parks O O O (~) e) Other public faalities~ () () () (~) Comments: a) The site, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, would be served by Fire Station 173, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, '/a mde north of Base Line Road ~ The hre station'is, approximately 1 1/2 mtles from the . prolect site, which meets the Fire District's Strategic Master Plan by being within the 4 minute response time goal The prolect will not regwre the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the prolect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticpated b) Police protection and routine patrols of the site and surrounding areas is provided by the Rancho Cucamonga substation of the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the prolect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the prolect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District The prolect will be required to pay school fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of Bulding Permits No impacts are anticipated d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located approximately 1 1/4 mile from the prolect site The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed prolect will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, • currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The prolect will not regwre the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulatwe development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services Rev 4/20/05 ~ i ~ i ~ ~ t ~ \ Initial Study for ~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594,iDRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 ' Pane 27 Less mm, s~ornecam Lox, i Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 a^~e^~~e~y 9prvtcant wnn ~ Miuvaum me., ap.ncan No According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the protected demand The General Plan FEIR identrfiecj the cumulative impact 'on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the, General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of th0 General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the projected need of 15,500 square feet at bwld-out of the City 14. RECREATION. Would the protect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational faalities such that substantial physical deterioration of'the facility would occur or be accelerated ti) Does the protect include recreational facilities or () () () (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environments ' Comments• a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The' ~ nearest park is located approximately 1 ~/< miles from the protect site This protect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A standard condition .of approval will requre the developer to pay park development fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above 15. TRANSPOpTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the protect , a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in () () (/) ( ) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e , result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () (/) ( ) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (/) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety nsks~ d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm egwpment)~ • ~J • D~EtF -I©Z Rev 4/20/05 Initial Study for ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01 q02, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Paae 26 Less Than ~ ' $ipnificani Lela Issues and Su ortin Information Sources. PP g 'me"ua"Y s.7 rnficant won Miupaoon Than Spnl'cant No I an loco lea i ' ~ e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacily~ ~ O O O (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e.g , bus , turnouts, bicycle racks) ' Comments: a) A traffic study was prepared by Transtech Engineers, Inc , that concluded the implementation of the proposed protect will generate 494 p m ,two-way peak hour trips. The proposed protect includes the development of a 112 room hotel, two restaurant pad buildings totaling 10,893 square feet, a t~No-story office building totaling 46,000 square feet, a bank and office bulling totaling 6,583 square feet, and a gas'station with a convenience store and food court totaling 8,189 square feet As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho' Cucamonga area The proposed tirotect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The County of San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan has identified a LOS E or better for all intersections • The application proposes also includes a Development Code Amendment to add hotel uses within Community Commercial Districts A comparable retail protect in the Community Commercial District, using the same square as the proposed hotel (64,800 square feet), would generate 277 two-way peak hour trips, as compared to 78 two-way peak hour trips for the hotel The addition of hotel uses is less intensive than comparable retail protects in Community Commercial Districts with regard to two-way, peak hour automobile top generation protections. The application proposes a land use change from Office to Community Commeraal. According to the Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model, Communty Commercial uses generate 4 28 two-way peak hour trips per 1,000 square feet Office uses generate 2 36 twq-way peak hour trips per 1,000 square feet The two-way, peak hour top generation difference between the two uses is 1 92, lust under two vehicles This increase in the two- way peak hour top generation between the existing (Office) and the proposed land use (Community Commercial) will be mitigated by the proposed median break on Foothill Boulevard near the east boundary of the protect (see discussion under b below) The median break will improve the existing intersection operation at Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue According to a Traffic Signal Warrant Study by Wildan, the delay would improve significantly from 237 7 seconds to 95 2 seconds. This improvement is because of relief of westbound left turning volumes at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, by providing a westbound left turn movement at the proposed signal location Also, the median break would not only relieve not only the westbound left turn movement on Foothill Boulevard at Rochester Avenue, but also the northbound left turn movement on Rochester Avenue at Foothill Boulevard The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in protect design The protect will not create a substantial increase in the number • of vehicle trips, traffic volume or congestion at intersections The protect site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, in order to comply with Measure I, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid Rev 4/20/05 1`~~C--~ ~ -) O 3 I,), , Initial Study for '~ ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01802, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, 4RC2005-00365, AND DRC2005 01124 Paoa 29 Less Teen Sipmficam Less I Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polenhally Sprufiwnl wnn ~ Mihpahan Tnen 9pnficant No I act Irico te0 1 1 • by the applicant prior to issuance of Building Perfnits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation The impact is considered to be less-than-signrficant ~ ' b) According to the traffic study prepared by Transtech Engineers, Inc , implementation of the proposed protect will generate 494 p.m , tWO-way peak hour trips which is 1f3ss than the 1,000 two-way peak hour trips for retail land use, therefore, the protect, is belovlt the threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) critena for requiring a traffic impact analysis In addition to being below the County's threshold for a CMP ~ ' analysis and in compliance with Measure I, the Clty has adopted a comprehensive transportation fee schedule to ensure that all new development pays its fair share toward regional transportation improvement protects San Bernardino Assoaation of Governments (SANBAG), which acts the San ~ Bernardino Counfy Congestion Management Agency (CMA), has reviewed the City of Rancho Cucamonga's transportation fee impact schedule and found the City's transportation impact schedule to be an acceptable method of mitigating transportation impacts. As a result of the City's ' comprehensive transportation fee impact schedule, SANBAG has issued a, letter that waives the County's CMP TIA analysis requirement for all new development protects within the City of Rancho Cucamonga through November 2006 The protect proposes a median break in ordef to cdnstruct a traffic signal 'at the eastern • boundary of the protect The median break and signalized intersection will bQ spaced less than the standard 1/4 mile intersection spacing as~identified in the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan In order to support the request for a median break, the applicant I has aligned the signal with entry points for two commercial protects one located at the northeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard and the other located at the southeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard Wiltdan (December 2005) prepared a traffic signal warrant study and analyzed the Level of Service (LOS) for the existing Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard intersection, the intersection at Masi Drive and Foothill Boulevard and for the proposed intersection at the easterly boundary of the protect The traffic signal warrant study states that under post-protect conditions without the median break, the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue declines to an unacceptable LOS F during both the a m. and p m peak hours Under post protect conditions with the median break, the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue would operate acceptably during the a m peak hour (LOS C), but would continue to operate at an unacceptable LOS F during the p m peak hour. The delay, however, would improve significantly from 237 7 seconds to 95 2 seconds This improvement is because of relief of westbound left turning volumes at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, by providing a westbound left turn movement at the proposed signal location With the ultimate improvements of a dual westbound at eastbound turn lanes on Foothill Boulevard at Rochester Avenue, the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue would improve from a LOS C to be B in the a m peak hour and from a LOS F to D during the p m peak hour The study also states that the LOS at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Masi Drive would still operate at an acceptable level of service and not be negatively or positively affected by the proposed • median break and signal at the eastern boundary of the protect Also, the median break would not only relieve not only the westbound left turn movement on Foothill Boulevard at DES' - to `~ Rev 4/20/05 I ~' I ~ i . • Initial Study for ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01802, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, gRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005 Ot 124 Paae 30 Less man I Si9nncanl Less ~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potanaally S,bnn¢ant With Minyaaon Then $ignificani No I act Inro ratetl I act I ct Rochester Avenue, but also the northbouhd left tifrn movement on Rochester Avenue at Foothill Boulevard Wilh a median break and full improvements to Foothill Boulevard (dual east and west turning movements at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue), the intersection where the proposed signal Is located would operate at a LOS B during the, a m. and p m peak hours The study also states that the median break wiq also provide relief for the northbound left turn movement on Rochester Avenue at Foothill Boulevard by mitigating stacking The City's Traffic Engineer has reviewed and concurs with the " proposed traffic signal warrant analysis and median break prepared by W,Ildan The p(otect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing The protect will not negatively impact th'e level of service standards on adtacent arterials The protect will be requned to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the'site The impact is considered to be less-than-significant I ~ , c) Located approximately 4 miles northeasterly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change dir traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) The protect is in an area that is,rhostly developed The protect will be regwred to provide • street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The protect design, does not Include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The protect will, therefore, not create a Substantial increase in hazards because of I a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The protect well be designed to provide access for all emergency veJ~icles and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated f) The applicant is requesting a reductien in the amount of required parking based upon a shared parking analysis The City's Development Code acknowledges that there are opportunities where shared parking may be appropriate Charles Joseph Associates prepared a shared parking analysis of the mixed use protect site consisting of a hotel, two restaurant pad buildings, atwo-story office and retail building, a bank and office building, and a gas station with convenience store and food court and concluded that the site presents an opportunity for shared parking Shared-use parking studies are based on industry research regarding parking generation rates and utilization patterns Research organizations such as the Urban Land Institute (ULI) and the Institute for Transportation Engineers (ITE) have conducted extensive research to determine peak hour parking demand The planning staff evaluated the shared parking analysis by Charles Joseph Associates (CJA) and compared datum from a parking study prepared by Walker Parking Consultants (2005) for a similar protect that consisted of a hotel, two office buildings, a restaurant and two pad commercial buildings Walker Parking Consultants has extensive experience in parking analysis and shared parking, having participated in the recent update of the ULI landmark study of mixed-use developments • The shared parking analysis for the protect site by CJA is based on research that certain protects can effectively share a pool of parking because of two primary phenomena that occur in mixed uses 1) offset peak hour parking demands that occur between certain pi ~ l05 Rev 4/20/05 Initial Study for ~~ ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-010P2, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005 01124 Paae 31 Less Than I 99nficant Less Iss es and Su ortin Information Sources U PP g FatanYally Sidniew~t wan Miuga4an roan Sgnficant No I act Into te0 I ~ I uses and 2) a certain percentage of vehicles will utilize more than one use on the protect and are classified as "captive " Offset peak hour relationships occur when two or more uses, such as .an office having peak hour parking demands between the hours of 8 00 a m and 5 00 p m and a steakhouse that is open after 5 00 p m ,are able to utilize a significant amount of parking stalls from the same parking pool Land, uses with offset peak hour parking demands can mutually benefit from the same parking pool because of a phenomenon known as static net parking demand Static net parking demand is defined as the actual parking demand of a speafic use at a specified time. For example, a steakhouse that is open for dinner only will have a have static net parking demand of 0 between the hours of 8 00 a m and 5 Oq p m As such, stalls that would pe allocated for a steakhouse under traditional parking count calculations can be utilized by a daytime use, such as office Actual parking demand care be also reduced because some customers will already be present or "captive" for existing uses (i a office worker who walks to the on-site restaurant for lunch) Vehicles that~re coming from off-site and create a parking demand are referred to as "non-captroe." Thus, the actual parking demand is not the simple sum of all proposed uses, but a calculated demand based upon peak hour use that factors rn static net parking demands, non-captive and captive ratios , r~ L Since the protect consists of 29,600 square feet of office, 23,000 square feet of retail, and a 112 room hotel, the likelihood of captive use among the proposed mixed-use protect is moderate to significant As noted above, Walker Parking Consultants has extensive • experience with shared parking analysis On a previous analysis done by Walker Consultants for a protect that had a similar land use composition, a 25 percent captive ratio for retail and slt-down dining and a 35 percent captive ratio for fast-food was utilized For this protect, based upon the proposed square footages of retail and office use, staff utilized a more conservative 10 percent captive ratio for retail and sit-down dining Avery conservative 10 percent captive ratio for fast-food was utilized All uses were calculated with 100 percent occupancy assumption Based upon prior parking studies and the proposed land use composition, the peak hour parking demand for all land uses will be ~n the early afternoon (1 00 p m - 3 00 p m) Durng the early afternoon, the office and retail ' uses will be at peak use, and the sit-down restaurant, although not a peak use, will still be generating a significant amount of cars The applicant is requesting a reduction of 42 parking stalls or an 8 percent reduction of the Development Code requirement of 508 stalls to 466. The 508 stall figure is based upon a traditional parkrng calculation, adding up the total amount of regwred parking based upon each type of land use using the City's Development Code parking stall ratios During the early afternoon peak hour parking demand, planning staff calculates that the total amount of regwred shared parking will be 453 stalls The 453 stall count includes a conservative cushion of 15 percent The protect proposes 466 stalls, which is 13 stalls greater than the 453 peak hour stall requrement Some parking studies cite that the real estate standard for occupancy rates is actually 95 percent (100 percent occupancy was utilized for the proposed protect) If the 95 percent occupancy rate is factored rnto the shared parking analysis, the protect will have additional available stalls as the amount of required parking drops based upon the real estate industry standard of a 5 percent vacancy rate Further, as the City continues to develop and more restaurants and retail services are constructed, the non-captive ratios should fall, thereby adding more stalls to the protected 13 stall surplus No impacts are anticipated • ~~ ``°~ Rev 4/20/05 ', Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005=01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005.01002, DRC2005-01A03, SUBTPM17594, DRC200 a-00332, AND DRC2005 01124 Lass may $,grpficenl Lm Polenaally WM Tfi+^ Issues and Supporting Information Sources Siv~ufica~e ~ul,wfi~ `~^~^ N° I ad Inro IeC I i g) The protect design includes, or the protect wd' be conddioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ). • UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEM§. Would the protect 16 . a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (~) i applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (~) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (~) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (~) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () ('~) provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commdments~ f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (~) capacity to accommodate the protect's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (~) regulations related to solid waste Comments: a) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant, located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1, located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated • c) handle the flows cA Gradidng andsDra Wage P arnimustibe approved by he Bui ding Offic a~ and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits The impact is not considered significant ~ [_ I `= - ~ O~ Rev 4/20/05 ,;4; / , Imhal Study for ''~ ~ ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-010iQ2, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, gRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 + Paae 33 Less Then 9prvficanl, Lass I ' Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially $idufiwnt WM1h MiUpaban Then S~grvncant No I h Into eteC 1 act I 1 d) The CVWD provides water treatment, storage, end distribution of domestic water to Rancho Cucamonga and portions of the cities of Ontario and Fontana and a tract in Upland The current daily water usage inrthe G'VWD service area is 41 7 million gallons per day (mgd) Residential water use amounts to about 60 percent of the total water consumed Landscaping (public and private) is the next' largest consumer of wader at 20 percent i Under Senate Bill 610 (SB 610), Water Supply Assessments are required for protects that exceed the following sizes 1) residential development of more than 500 dwelling units, 2) shipping center or business establishmgnt employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 540,000 square feet, 3) commercial office buildings employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 250,000 square feet, 4) hotel or motel having more than 500 rooms, 5) industrial, manufacturing, processing plant, o~ industrial park housing more than 1,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or having more than 650,000 square feet, 6) mixed use protect including one or more of the protects specified above; 7) any othelr protect that would demand an amount bf water equivalent to or grater than the amount of water required by a 500-dwelling unit protect, and 8) any protect that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or morel in the number of existing service connections for a public water system Under SB 221 a Water Supply Assessment is required when 1) a protect that is a residential development of more than 500 dwelling units, 2) a protect that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more `in the number of existing service connections for a public water system, and, 3) applies to development agreements that include such subdivision. The protect is served, by the CVWD water system. The proposed protect does not exceed any of the above-cited thresholds for a water analysis. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the Citys solid waste disposal needs g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. l~iC,F-~©`v • • • Rev 4/20/05 • • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-010102, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, f.)RC2005-00365, AND DRC2005 01124 P8a2 34 Less men , Sipmncent Less ~ Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Foleneally Si4^~ncant W,Ih lAUpaoon Tnzn SipnM1Ceni No i i yea , i 17. 'MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE '1 a) Does the protect have the potential to' degrade the () ~ () (1 (/) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or ' wildlife population to drop below self-sustaming'levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, , reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important ' examples of the mator periods of Califgrnia history or prehistory ' b) Does the protect have impacts that are'mdroidually, O O O (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable? (°Cumulatively considerable" means that the mcrermental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) ` c) Does the protect have environmental effects that wdl () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indvectly~ Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, rt is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for sigmficant adverse environmental effects of bwld•out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result m significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is requred • c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Q~~tF_ f~~ Rev 4/20/05 Initial Study for ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-010p2, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Page 35 Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts 'are at less-than-significant levels ~ , EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier~ElR or Negative Declaration per'Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Drv~sion offices, 10500 Ciwc Center Dnve (check all that apply) (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certfied October,l7, 2001) (/) Master Envvonmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (/) Water Quality Management Plan (Assoaated Engineers, June 2005) (/) Acoustical Analysis (Davy and Associates, Inc ,June 2005) (/) Peak Trip Hour Generation Analysis (Transtech Engineers, August 2005) (/) Traffic Signal Warrant Study (Wtlldan, January 2006) (/) Shared Parking Analysis (Charles Joseph Associates, February 2006) i E t ~ -`~ • C~ • Rev 4/20/05 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01Q02, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, pRC2005-00365, ' • AND DRC2005-01124 Page 36 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION i I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study , I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protec- plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the , effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects, would occur , ' Applicant's Signature Date ~ ~ ~~~ ~ Print Name and Title Y;~nctr~ LE g uQ,1{-~ ~E~'-111 Rev 4/20/05 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE,DECLARATION The /ol/owing Mitigated Negahve DeclaratOn rs being c~rcufated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Oualrty Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01000, General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006, Development District Amendment DRC2006-01002, Development Code Amendment DRC2005-01003, Tentative Parcel 'Map SUBTPM17594, Conditiohal UsA Permit DRC2005-00365, and Variance DRC2005-01124 , Public Review Penod Closes: August 9, 2006 Project Name• Project Applicant: Charles Joseph Associates Project Location (also see attached map): Located in the'Community Commercal Distnct (Subarea 4) within the Foothill Boulevard Distracts, at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue - APN 0227-152-18 and 31 Project Description: A request to amend the General Plan Circulation Element to allow a median break on Foothill Boulevard approximately 1,OOOYeet east of the intersection of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard for the purposes of permitting a signalized intersection that will be located • less than the standard 1,320 feet intersection spacing regwrAment; a request to change the land use designation and development distract designation from Office to Community Commercial, a request to amend the Community Commercial District land use regulations within Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts to add hotels, motels and mator hotel facilities as a Conditionally Permitted Use and cocktail lounges within major hotel facilities as a Conditionally Permitted Use, and a request to subdivide 8 21 acres of land into 6 parcels for commercial purposes m the Office Professional District, and the development of a master plan, with a request to allow a maximum bwlding height of 55 feet where a maximum budding height of 45 feet is allowed, for an office and commercial center consisting of a 112 room hotel, two restaurant pad buildings totaling 10,893 square feet, atwo-story offGCe and retail budding totaling 46,000 square feet, a bank and office budding totaling 6,583 square feet and gas station with convenience store and food court totaling 8,189 square feet in the Community Commercial District (Subarea 4) within the Foothill Boulevard Districts, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the protect may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but. (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and • (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment '~~~ , „ ' ~ , MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ' ~ DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-0'1002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 ' ~ ~ August 9, 2006 ~ ~ ' Page 2 If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and'all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Centel Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. ~ NOTICE ' The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration~during the review period. ~ August 9 2006 Date of Determination Adopted By • n U ~F,F ' ~~3 1,` 1 RESOLU~fION NO 06-76 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17594, A S4BDIVISION OF 8.21 ACRES OF LAND INTO SIX PARCELS FOR COMMERCIAL ~ PURPOSES IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 4) WITHIN THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULVARD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKINGFINDINGSINSUPPORTTHEREOF-APN 0227-152-18 AND 31 A. Rentals 1) Charles Joseph Associates filed an app cation for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17594, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subtect Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application." 2) On the 9th day August of 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFOR, d is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commisson of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth ip the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public he~lring on August 9, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows. a The application applies to the property located at the northeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, with a street frontage of approximately 900 feet on Foothill Boulevard and a lot depth of approximately 400 feet, and b The property to the north of the subtect site is zoned Low Residential and is developed with single-family homes, the property to the south is zoned Industrial Park (Subarea 7) and is comprised of vacant land and the historic Aggazzotti home and former winery site; the property to east is zoned Open Space and is developed with Edison Transmission Towers; and the property to the west is zoned Community Commercial within the Terra Vista Community Plan and is developed with various commercial uses; and c. The application proposes the subdivision of an 11 70-acre site into six parcels ranging in size from 0 84 acre to 2 29 acres. Ail parcel sizes are permitted since the protect site is part of a Master Plan The protect site and the parcel map will provide appropriate easements for reciprocal access, parking and maintenance, and D Ems- 11 `-1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-76 SUBTPM17594 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 Page 2 d The application, m confunctio,n with Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365, proposes the development of a Master Plan consisting of a hotel, two restaurant buildings, a two-story office and retail building, a bank, a gas station with convenience store and fast-food restaurant; and e The subdiwsion, together with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minimum development standards for the C~tp of Rancho Cucamonga. 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public hearing and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth ih Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable Speafic Plans, and b The design or improvements of the Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and c. The site is physically swtable for the type of development proposed; and ' d The design of the subdiwsion is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable infury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e The Tentatve Parcel Map is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and f The design of the Tentative Parcel Map will not conflict with any easerrfent acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdiwsion 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect , will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the protect. Based on the findings contained m that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration b The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (u) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission furtherfinds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration ~F~ -l\S PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-76 SUBTPM17594 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 , ~ Page 3 c The Planning Commissidn has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the prolect that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with'the mitigation measures during prolect implementation The Planning Commis;ion therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the prolect. d Pursuant to the requirements of California Fish and Game Code Section 711 4 and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section'753.~, the Planning Commission finds, based on the Initial Study, the Mitigated Negatroe Declaration, and considering the record as a whole, that there is no evidence before the City that the proposed prolect will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends The prolect site is disturbed from previous weed abatement activities, the prolect site is surrounded by commercial and residential development, and the site has not been identified as potential location for habitat that is known to support sensitive biological speaes Fyrther, the site contains no blue Ime streams Based on substantial evidence, the Planning Commission hereby makes a declaration rebutting the presumption of adverse effect as set forth m California Department of Fish and Game Regulation 753.5 (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Code, Section 753 5) e. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the deasion of the Planning Commission is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, • California 91730, (909) 477-2750. 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth In Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth ' below and m the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Plannino Department 1) Approval of the SUBTM17594 is granted contingent upon approval of the Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365, Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-01002, Development Code Amendment DRC2005-01003 and General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006 2) All applicable Conditions of Approval per Resolution No. 06-77 approving Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-003265 shall apply 3) Approval is for asix-parcel subdivision of land for commeraal purposes 4) Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall be prepared (or amended) to address such issues as reciprocal ingress and egress, reciprocal parking, property maintenance standards, landscaping standards, and adherence to the Uniform Sign Program m order to ensure coordinated long term maintenance of the prolect. The CC&Rs shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission and the City Attorney prior to map recordation ~ F ~ ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.06-76 SUBTPM17594 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 Page 4 ~ Engineering Deoartment 1) Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Mator Divded Arterial" standards as regwred and including: a) Provide or protect curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, street trees, dnve approaches, signing, and striping. b) Reconstruct curb return/curb and gutter and relocate traffic signal egwpment at the northeast corner, of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue. c) Provide or protect R26(s)' "No Stopping" signs along the Foothill Boulevard frontage d) No new median openings are allowed in the Foothill Boulevard median without a traffic signal. e) ~ Protect or replace traffic signal egwpment. f) Provide deceleration/right-turn lanes for Foothill Boulevard driveways, as requiretl , g) The driveway with median shall have two 20-foot wide dnve aisles separated by a 10-foot wide median The median shall not extend into the public right-of-way. h) Signalized driveway must align with proposed driveway on the south side of Foothill Boulevard. i) The Foothill Boulevard frontage shall be designed in accordance with the City adopted Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan including street lights, traffic signal, activity centers, street pavers Route 66 and median ~) Obtain additional street/sidewalk easements from Southern California Edison and San Bernardino County Flood Control District in contunction with the proposed easterly right-turn lane k) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check from Rochester Avenue to Day Creek Channel Badge 2) Rochester Avenue frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Mator Divided Arterial" standards as regwred and mcludmg: 1) Provide or protect curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, street trees, drive approach, traffic signs, and striping, as regwred. • • ~J '~+) i " ~I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-76 ~ s, SUBTPM17594 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES ~, August 9, 2006 „ ~~ • Page 5 ., 2) Prtlvide a combined northbound "busbay/right-turn lane on Rochester Avenue for driveway 3) Provide or protect R26(s) "No Stopping" signs along Rochester Avenue frontage „ ~, 4) The Rochester Avenue drroeway is to be right turn in and out only Pestripe Rochester Avenue as regwred 5) The driveway with median shall have two X20-foot drive aisles separated by a 10-foot wide median. The median shall not extend into the public right-of-way. , 6) Protect or replace traffic signal egwpment. r 3) The follo4vmg are regwred on-sde a) ~ Provide stacking for four cars (25 feet per car) at the signalized driveway "" b) i Provide an easement for the maintenance of traffic signal. c) Prowde clear lanes for north and south traffic at the signalized drive aisle. . d) Prowde a sign as shown above that 'reads "Wait Here Fbr Sigrial" at signalized drive aisle. e) Provide "Keep Clear" pavement legend 4) Reconstruct Fennel Road to a reduced radius turn-around per City Standard 113, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 5) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 Kv electrical) on the protect side of Rochester Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole off-site north of the protect boundary to the first pole offsite south of Foothill Boulevard, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate 6) The developer shall construct electrical distribution faalities in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Muniapal Utility requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal • Utility The Rancho Municpal Utility shall be the electrical service provider for all protect related development. ''4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-76 SUBTPM17594 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 ~ i Page 6' 7) This development shall pay the City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency $150,734 78 for ParceI~APN 0227-152-31 and $302,590 26 for Parcel APN 0227-152-18 as part of the 2003-01 CFD improvements The said amount§ wdl increase after September 1, 2006, as determined by the Redeveloprrlent Agency. 8) An in-lieu fee for one-fourth the cost of constructing special pavers within the Foothill Boulevard /Rochester Avenue intersection shall be paid to the City prior to final map recordation The fee amount shall be based on the square footage of the intersection 9) Foothill Boulevard median island including landscaping and irngation shall be reconstructed in coniunction with the signalized driveway at the easterly protect boundary Revise existing Landscape Maintenance Distract plans (LMD) accordingly to reflect the above improvements , a) This protect wdl disrupt an existing City-maintained landscape and irrigation area. Pnor to new construction, a toint inspection and documentation of the condition of the existing work shale occur with both the new contractor and the City inspector The existing irrigation system shall be relocated as needed and any damaged landscaping replaced to the satisfaction of the City Engineer At this point, the new construction contractor shall be responsible for maintenance of both the new and existing areas The developer shall assume maintenance responsibility for the altered landscape area fora minimum of 90 days after reconstruction A follow-up inspection of both areas is regwred prior to the City's acceptance of the new area. 10) Prowde a 12-foot wide storm drain easement to be dedicated to the City on the Tentative Parcel Map. a) Provide two sump catch basins and laterals in Fennel Road and shall be designed to handle Q,oo• b) The storm drain shall be reinforced concrete pipe and shall be Q,m design No treatment structures allowed in City's storm drain 11) The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) submitted with the tentative map application has been reviewed and found to be substantially complete Include the Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the plan on Grading Plans when submitted for techrncal plan check. [-~- ~~~1 • • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-76 SUBTPM17594 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 • Page 7 Environmental Mdigation Aesthetics 1) A Photometric diagram shall be submitted' and approved pnor'to Building Permit issuance demonstrating that illumination from the protect is confined within the protect's bound~nes and meets the Citys foot candle regwrements Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as permanufacturers'speafications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction • measures imposed bythe South Coast Au Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local • ordinances and use sound engineering practices )^~ I ' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-76 ~ ' ~ ' SUBTPM17594 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 ~ ~ i i Page 8 ' ' , , Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City rf ~ ' silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. ' „ „ Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i e., wind speeds) ~~ " exceeding 25 mph) In accordance with Rula'403 requvements. , Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks ' or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. , ~ ~ , 6) The srte'shall be treated with vJater or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and the Reg~gnal Water QualityControl Board [RWOCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions,' hn accordance With SCAQMD Rule 403 , , , 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by~SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM;a emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electfic or clean alternative fuel-powered egwpment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction Grading ~, Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use. , 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs regwring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged penods (i e., in excess of 10 minutes,). 11) All industral and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be requued to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrohnk schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 14) All residential and commeraal structures shall be regwred to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stepping l~ -~~-1 • ,'~ , , • • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-76 , SUBTPM17594 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 • Page 9 ~~ Cultural Resources ' 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or „ during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist•to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wdl ~, Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites ,from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following • appropriate CEOA guidelines. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualfed paleontologist to monitor construction actrodies, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures. Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has • completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-76 ~' SUBTPM17594 -CHARLES JO,,~EPH ASSOCIAtES August 9, 2006 ' Page 10 ~'`I 1 ~~~ ~ I~ ' `~ i~ Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i a ,San Bernardino County Museum) Submit a summary report to the' City~of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) dadyto reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant~landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated vJith vehicle tracking of sod off-site "'timing may vary depending upon the time,of year of construction ., 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions Hydrology and Water Quarry 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Budding pfficial for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) speafically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures tocontrol on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize sod exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. p E,~ -12 3 • • • ~'h i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION~NO 06-76 SUBTPMi 7594 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 ~ • Page 11 , 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sedimentfrom the sde when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will tie , performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust m order to prevent discharge of debris or Sediment from the sde , 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Associated Engineers, ' ~ June 9, 2005, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the stone ' drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped n i g mizi min areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits ' • 7) Ponding areas on the south side of the protect are depressed to promote the retention and infiltration of treated runoff and irrigation water. ~ ' g) Rooftops dram to landscaping prior to entering storm dram system. 9) Collection inlets provided with trash guard/grate. ' 10) Rinker Stormcepter installed to treat water before entering infiltration area 11) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm dram system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identifythe structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga m June 2004 12) Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General • Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the W aste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Bwlding Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit ~ ~ ~ - f'Zy ,,~ . PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-76 ~ , SUBTPM17594 -CHARLES JO$EPH ASSOCIATES ~ , August 9, 2006 i Page 12 ' ~ • Nose ~ , 1) Exterior An 8-foot high masonry wall shall be constructed along the north property line in order to provide a sound attenuation and privacy between the single-family dwelling unit's to the north and the protect 2) Interior. All youth faang windows and glass doors in the hotel budding shall have an STC rating of 32 or greater. 3) A final acoustical report~shall be submitted for Planning Director rewew ' and approval prior to the issuance of Budding Permits The final report , shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 40 dBA for , the hotel rooms, the budding materials and construction techniques regwred., The budding plans wdl be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 4) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours ~of 8.00 p m and 6 30 a.m. on wdekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. , 5) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards speafied in Development Code Section 17 02.120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly . noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02 120 Monitoring at other times may be regwred by the Budding Offical. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Budding , Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Budding Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 6) The perimeter block wall along the north property line shall be ' constructed as early as possible 7) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6.30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily taps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. l7 C ~' -l~ • ' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-76 SUBTPM17594 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 Page 13 ., 6 The Secretary to this Commission sFiall certify to the adoption of this Resolution ~APP~iOVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF AUGUST 2006 ~ ~ ., PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ~tANCHO CUCAMONGA ' ~ „ BY. " Pam Stewart, Chairman , ATTEST James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary. I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the ' Planning Commission held on the 9th day of August 2006, by the following vote-to-wit• AYES COMMISSIONERS. • NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS 5 ~1 1 5 I City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORIN,~ PROGRAM Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01000, General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006, Development District Amendment D'RC2005-01002, Development Code Amendment DRC2005-01003, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM1,7594, Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365, and Variance DRC2005-01124 °" This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed protect This program , has been prepared in compliance with State law toy ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public ResouFces Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elem0nts 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance ThQ mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance Will be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, ~yet.,flexible gwdelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon ~' recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP wdl be in-place through all phases of the project The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken oh each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps wdl be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who wdl take action, what action will betaken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All momtonng and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address • City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency (Planning Department) 10500 Cmc Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 p ~r~ - t 2-7 Mitigation Monitoring Program DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC205-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005- 00365, AND DRC2005-01124 • 'Page 2 , 3 Appropriate speaalists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is nee7ded, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor spechfic mitigation ~ aFtivities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner. 4 The protect pfanner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Forrn. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development ` 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring wdl be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arise regwnng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the protect planner or responsible City department and;a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the • authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. S Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Diwsion shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to momtor and report ' on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time 9 In those instances regwring long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation actiwties at the protect site and reporting the mondonng results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to knowwhether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of bwlding permits 7C (= - 1Z~ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART 111) Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01000 General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006, Development District Amendment DRC2005-01002 Development Code Amendment DRC2005-01003 Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17594, Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365, and Variance DRC2005-01124 Applicant: Charles Joseph Associates Initial Study Prepared by: Donald Grander Date: January 17, 2006 ,~ 1 .. . • .. -. . • -. .. ~ ~ n.; :, "x~° 14 -~S}_u _ ' i~3`"i~L;t' w' tips f''":+~°u„-.~;r ` . a Aesthetics - -5 Y it,p~-ih .. +ZiS 4P'S.,.a:'.,Ji. s z'~ e~}r~ y~~,~7,+.°:VN49r ,,... `°~y.+: ;tst,.r ~ - S"+.."*-;^"°~:?!,`7P`" ' -- ' _ .- , _ °_ A Photometric diagram shall be submitted and approved CP B Review of Plans C 2,4 prior to Budding Permit issuance demonstrating that illumination from the protect is confined within the protect's boundaries and meets the City's foot candle - _ requirements - - _ 1. °UZ .~i ~ ^ ~ y t. " Y Irk Su F AIM1QU811t +- ''~ ~ T :" ~- ; n'iY~„ st`d`` Y~ a '~+'r', ti' Y~ _ ~"~ ~ t. ,n .n C _ Y - ~, ` .. - ~'. 34' ~ - _ Y t s ) - ~ ;;~ _rr 3 4 : ~ M _ e3 All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans AIC __ 2~4 = operating conddion so as to reduce operational - _ , emissions The contractor shall ensure that all _ - _ construction egwpment is being properly serviced and - - _ ° maintained as per manufacturers' specficetions _ i Maintenance records shall be available at the - _ - construction site for City venfication Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the CPIBO C Review of plans C 2 -- developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected _ egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction = egwpment wdi be utilized, or that their use was = _ - _ investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect - - Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality - Management Distract (SCAQMD) as well as City = Planning Staff 1 of 10 - .. .. -. . ~ -. .. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans AIC __ -- - 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAOMD Rule 1113 -- Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards BO B Review of plans AIC 2 noted in SCAOMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAOMD BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Revew of plans AIC 2/4 through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibddy of large BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 areas to erosion over extended penods of time t~J Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Revew of plans AIC 2/4 v exposed excavated soft during and after the end of work penods - Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 1 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices - _ _ _ Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the Cdy rf sdt is carved over to adtacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of _ - construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance vnth construction SCAOMD Rule 403 requvements _ • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction suitable means • _ 210 __ -- • • ~ - - The site shall be treated with water or other BO soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions The construction contractor shall uttlize electnc or clean BO alternative fuel powered egwpment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that BO construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not ~n use All industrial and commercial faafities shall post signs BO regwnng that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) ~ All industrial and commeraal facilities shall designate CP _ preferential parking for vanpools i All industrial and commeraal site tenants with 50 or CP more employees shall be required to post both bus and U./ Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas All industrial and commeraal site tenants with 50 or CP more employees shall be regwred to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible All residential and commeraal structures shall be regwred to incorporate high-effiaency/low-pollutmg heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters BO All residential and commeraal structures shall be regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and BO weather-stripping ' C Dunng A _ _ 4 constructon C I Dunng I A I 14 construction C I Review of plans I AIC I - 14 - C Review of plans AIC 2l4 C Review of plans A C Review of plans AIC C Review of plans D C ~ Review of plans ~ D CID ~ Review of plans ~ C CID ~ Review of plans ~ C 3of10 4 - - 2/3 _ - - - 2l3 - 2/3 Z4 - ' 2/4 ' ~ .- ~. .. , Cultural Resource"s ~ ~ ,.-, -.~- ~,,,° . -n '"~~~~e;t?~,,~4 ~°~, ~ ?,;~~; 'x>;•x-~., ; "` `' `"''.:: ~:^ ~ 'a `~~ ' >~ - ~ _ , , _ ~ , If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the _ archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will _ - _ • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CP/BO C Review of report '4ID 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification - - _ without an opportunity for the City to establish ds ~ - archaeological value _ • Consider establishing provisions to require CPIBO C Review of report '0JD _ 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point _ • Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Review of report AID - 3/4 archaeological heritage - '~ Propose mitigation measures and recommend CPIBO C Review of report A/D 3/4 , 1 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse prolect - _ effects on sigmficant, important, and unique - _ prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA _ - _ guidelines _ • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, vnth original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County = Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving - • _4~0 -- -- -- -- - - .. If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal CP B Review of report A/D _ - 4 fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the - developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activties, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation - measures (i a ,paleontological monitoring) that may be _ appropriate W here mitigaton monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the _ - following measures - _ • Assign a paleontological montor, framed and CP B Revew of report AID 4 - egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with _ minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of report AID 4 - or graded, divert earth-disturbing activties _ - - elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage - If construction personnel make the discovery, the - (I~ grading contractor should immediately droert _ - - - construction and notify the montor of the find - Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossiis for CP D Review of report D - - 3 ~ - l~ documentation in the summary report and transfer to - _ an appropriate deposdory p e , San Bernardino - _ County Museum) • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP C Review of report AID 3l4 ~- Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County - Museum t^_ y S^' Yy~r ;yeas _ ' Tir`c f, ~4~"`~~`-; ~._ ~, ol g ancl:Sodst' - G R -'M~a'>7a1•~t"<` i -.,.1 :>.~:1 ~:[: '~k, rGY,_t~ , ,,, - : o-k*; •• • - ' ~<.~ - t.'• z , . is ~i, ~, _ ~ _ . __ - -. - - e tt _ _ e o y , _ . a r __ The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO C- During A - 4 stabd¢mg agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) construction = _ daily to reduce PM,a emissions, in accordance with _ SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with draught resistant - - landscaping as soon as possible - 5of10 ,. .. ... . - -. .. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C Dunng A _ - ~ 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil _ off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of - year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C Dunng A - 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction - from the site dunng such episodes Chemical sod-stabd¢ers (approved by SCAOMD and B O C- - Dunng A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction _ construction _ areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions _ Hydrology and Water-Quality . _ ~ ': ~ -s4j ,: + - ,.~~~ ~_~r ', Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit BO B/C/D Review of plans AIC 2l4 applicant shall submit to Budding Official for approval, - - Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) - - - - speafically identifying Best Management Practices - _ - (BMPs) that shall be used on-sde to reduce pollutants - - _ dunng construction activdies entering the storm drain _ - - - _ - .system to the maximum extent practical. - ' An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO BICID Revrew of plans A/C - 2l4 grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect - - that identrfies specific measures to control on-site and - - off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activdies are initiated through completion of grading This erosion - control plan shall include the following measures at a _ - mimmum a) Speafy the timing of grading and construction to minimize sod exposure to rainy periods - expenenced inSouthern Calrfornia, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure - - that any erosion which does occur edher on-site or off- - - - site as a result of this project wdl be corrected through a ~ _ remediation or restoration program wdhin a specified _ time frame - -~ _, C. 6of10 - _ • - -- -__ Durng construction, temporary berms such as I BO I BICID I Reviewofplans I A/C __ I -- '-I 214 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/CID Review of plans AIC 2/4 cleaning wdl be performed poor to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in CE BICID Review of plans AIC 2l4 the Water Quality Management Pian prepared by Associated Engineers, June 9, 2005, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO BICID Review of plans AIC 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticideslherbicides Landscaped areas shall -_ be monitored and maintained for at least two years to - ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for -- _ ~ these areas, including mondonng provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval pnor to the issuance of grading , permds - _ i Ponding areas on the south side of the protect are CE BICID Review of plans AIC 214 ~ depressed to promote the retention and infiltration of - treated runoff and irngation water Rooftops drain to landscaping prior to entering storm CE B/CID Review of plans AIC - 2l4 drain system Collection inlets provided with trash guard/grate CE B/CID Review of plans AIC 2/4 Rinker Stormcepter installed to treat water before CE BIC/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 entering infiltration area - L _~ v, 7of10 . . .. . . . .. .. . . ~. .. Pnor to issuance of Budding Permits, the applicant shall CE B/CID Review of plans AIC 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that wail be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and __ non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdeiines s for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply - with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General _ - Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City ~ Building Official for coverage underthe NPDES General ` Construction Permd _ Noise ~ ~,_ ,_, ->- ;,• - ' ~°` ~~ _ .e• ~=' `s=ue= _ ;=~ `.~'~-`°"`~_ - -'"`-- _ - - ~ - Exterior An S-foot high masonry wall shall be CP B/CID Rev+ew of plans A,C = 2,4 = constructed along the north property line in order to _ _ provide a sound attenuation and privacy between the _ single-family dwelling units to the north and the project - - Intenor All south facing windows and glass doors m the CP B/C/D Review of plans A,C 2,4 - hotel bwlding shall have an STC rating of 32 or greater A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City CP B Review of plans A,C 2,4 _ Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of Budding Permits The final report shall discuss the level - _ of interior noise attenuation to below 40 dBA for the ~ _ hotel rooms, the budding matenals and construction - - techrnques required The budding plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report C l E a i -- _ - V ~( i .. .. ~ . " - . . .. Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During ~ A _ - 2,4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a " natonal holiday - " Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction " 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as speafied in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Offiaal Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Offiaal within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Bwlding Offiaal If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise _ standards or halted The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A - _ 2,4 as possible in first phase construction Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO C During A 4/7 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, - construction ~ including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a - - - _ national holiday Additionally, rf heavy trucks used for - hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to - and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mdigation plan denoting any - _ - construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings 9of10 V.... ~.. !`4.enLli~~ A{J~~nvi~finne ~~ _ _ ,1 W 10 of 10 __ . _ ° COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ,DEPARTMENT , STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17594 SUBJECT: ~ SUBDIVISION OF SIX PARCELS ~ , APPLICANT: CHARLES JOSEPH AND ASSOCIATES LOCATION: APN• 0227-152-18 AND 31 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements The appllcant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Cdy, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The appllcant shall reimburse the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, Its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The Clty may, a{its sole discretion, participate at its own expense In the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve appllcant of his obligations under this condition B. C. Time Limits 1 This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance wdh the approved plans which Include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director SC-1-05 1 ~~~ ~~~~ I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM~2006 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM17594Std Cond 8-09 doc Comolehon Date ~~- ~~_ -J-J. ~~- ,~ 1 , i Protect No SUBTPM17594 ' ~ Comolehon Date ' 3 All site, grading, landscape, Irrigation, and street Improvement plans shall be coordlr)ated for -/-/- • consistency prior to Issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval In the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first ' 4 Approval of this request shall~not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all ~-/-/_ other 8pplicable Clty Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans In effect at the time of bullding permit Issuance ~ ~ • The Covenants, Conditions, and Restnctions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the 5 ~_J- , . Homeowners' Association are subtect to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney They shall be recorded'concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the Issuance of bullding permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be sociation shall submit to the Planning ' A , s provided to the Clty Engineer The Homeowners t of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and Il t • s a Departmen every year and whenever said Information changes ' D.' Environmental ~ , 1 Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant Is responsible for the cost of ~~- implementing said measures, Including monitoring and'reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director In the amount of $495 00 prior to the Issuance of~ 'bullding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory erformance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds maybe used bythe Cltyto p retain consultants and/or pay for Clty staff time to monitof and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be ' considered grounds for forfeit ' APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) I SEE ATTACHED. , APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR ~ COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: , E. Dedication and ,Vehicular Access 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from ~~_ street centerline) 73 total feet on Foothill Boulevard ~-/- J ~ 50 total feet on Rochester Avenue - - - 2 Corner property Ilne cutoffs shall be dedicated per Clty Standards ~-/- 3 Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to ail parcels by CC&Rs or by ~~- deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the Issuance of bullding permlts, where no map Is involved 4 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring Point ' ~-J- s or maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 2 ~E-,F-1ti~ I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & SH Rpi\SUBTPM77594Std Cond 8-09 doc ~,~ ~~ Protect No SUBTPM17594 , Completion bate 5 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bepul~-claimed or dellneat~d on the • final map ' 6 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Clry , 7 ~ Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to prpvide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs 8 The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests ' ~ ~lecessary to construct the required public improvements, and'if he/she should fad to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of•the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Sections 66462 and 66462 5 at sUCh time as the City decdes to acquire the property'Interests required for the improvements Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City if the City decides to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with • the subdivision Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the ' amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City, at developer's cost The appraiser shall • have been approved by the City prior to commencergent of the appraisal This condition applies in particular, but not limited to Southern California Edison Company, San Bernardino County Flood Control Distract ~ , F. Street Improvements • Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which Is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, In addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Councll,'except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall mote then 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter A.C Pvmt Slde- walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Foothill Boulevard X X X X X X X Rochester Avenue' X X X X X X (e) Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and Irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item (e) Busbay Improvement Plans and Construction a Street Improvement plans, Including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety Ilghts on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the Clty Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street Improvements, priorto final map approval or the Issuance of budding permits, whichever occurs first \~ ' ~~` -/-/ -*-/-/- ~_/_ -/~_ ~~_ ~~- ~~- I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMMt2006 Res 8 Stf Rpt\SUBTPM77594Std Cond 8-09 doc 4 ,,~ . Protect No SUBTPM17594 ' Completion Date ' b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be palm and a _/_/_ construction permit shall be obtained frbm the City Engineer's Otiice in addition to any other permts required , • c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and ~ ~ /_/_ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the,Ciry Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction prolect along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and _J-/- , ~ interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside , of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer • Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at Intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200' ~ , feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of tntersections~per City ~~_ Standards or as directed by the Cdy Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with ~~_ adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaation of the City Engineer. g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be _/~_ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the Planning Directdr prior to submittal for first plan _/~~ check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall'be installed per City Standards In ~~_ ' accordance with the Citys street tree program r1 ~J ~ E ~ -~~~L a I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & SH Rpt\SUBTPM77594Std Cond 8-09 doc ~,)I Protect No SUBTPM17594 ' ~ ~ Comolehon Date 5 Install street trees per Clty street tree design gwc~elines and standards as follows The completed _~~_ legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear oh the title page of the street, , improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically ~ sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installaUOn in those areas shall be ~ per the public landscape improvement plans , The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other ' variables For additional information, contact the Protect engineer • Street Name Foothill Boulevard Botanical Name Lagerstroemia indica 'Muskogee' Common Name Crape Myrtle Hybrid- Lavender MIr1 Grow Space 3 feet ~ Spacing 15 feet O C Triangular 'Spacing Size 24 Inches box Oly. FILL ' IN Foothill Boulevard Non Activity Prunus blireiana NCN 3 feet 20 feet 15 , O C gallon Centers-Accent Tree Informal groupings not more than 25 percent of total ' ~ frontage trees Non Activity Centers Plantanus' California 8 feet 35 feet O C 15 gallon racemosa Sycamore Informal groupings Non Activity Centers Plantanus London plane Tree 8feet 30 feet p C 15 gallon acentoha Informal groupings Rochester Avenue Foreground Rhuslancea African 5feet 2O feet 15 Sumac O C gallon Formal Background Brachychiton Bottle Tree 8 feet 25 feet O C 15 gallon populneus Informal Construction Notes for Street I rees 1) All street trees are to be planted In accordance with City standard plans 2) lire City inspectoreAny unusuaato xcrt es or nutlent de icienc es moaysrequvefbacikf leso I amendments, as determined by the Clty inspector 3) All street trees are subfect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only • 1~,Cr~'-I~13 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM77594Std Cond 8-09 doc ~~ , Project N o SUBTPM17694 ' ~ Comoletion Date ' 6 Intersection brie of sight designs shall be reviewed by the Clty Engineer for conformagce with _/~_ adopted policy On collector or larger street's, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential'street intersections and commQrcial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight'plotted as required ' G. Public Maintenance Areas , 1 A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public W orks Standards sHali be -1_/- , submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of , 'building permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians„paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District Foothill Boulevard Median Island 2 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting ~~~ Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building , ' permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 3 Parkway landscaping or) the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective ~~_ Beautification Master Plan Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan, Including Traffic Signal, Median Island, Street Lights and Activity Centers ' ' H. Drainage and Flood Control ' 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the Ciry Engineer prior to final map ~~- ' approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the _/~_ property from adtacent areas • 3 A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control Distriot is required for work within its ~~ ' right-of-way I. Improvement Completion ' 1 If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, _J~- an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City i will be required for Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue Curb/Gutter, sidewalk, street signing/ striping, under grounding, signal equipment and proaches drive a t t , p rees, lights, stree busbay ' J. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, ~~_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary ~~- 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/~_ Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued bythe water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential • s D[~- I~~f I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stt Rpt\SUBTPM77594Std Cond a-09 doc Prgect No SUBTPM77594 ComGetwn Dete protects . 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other Interested agencies Involved Approval of the final parcel map well be subtect tp any requirements that may be received from them K. General Requirements and Approvals ~~ , 1 Permits shall be obtained from the following agencles for work within their right of-way: Southern C'ahforma Edison Company 2 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or pnor to building permit issuance rf no map is involved ~~ 3 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall bti~paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable rf at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application Is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COIIhPLIANCE~WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: None. .APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWWNG CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • 7 ~ Eta - 1 ~E S ~~~_ ~~- ~J- >~~. I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMMt2006 Res & Stl Rpt\SUBTPM17594Std Cond 8-09 doc Y { i II i ~~ Rancho Cucamonga Community Development ~ ~~ i! ' Building & Safety ~ '' h ~I COMMERCIAUINDUSTRIAL STANDARD CONDITIONS '~ I ~ ~ March 30, 2006 ' i Hotel & Commercial Development ~ ' NEC of Foothill & Rochester SUBTPM17594 & DRC2005-00365 , NOTE: Any revisions may void these requirements ar~d necessitate additional review. A. New Structures 1. Prowde compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistive construction. 2 The protect shall be designed to comply with the 2001 California Budding Codes (CBC), the California Fire Code and with RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39. • 3. Provide corripliance with the Califorrna Budding Code for regwred occupancy separations. , 4. Prowde draft stops in attic areas, not exceed 3,000 square feet, m accordance with CBC Section 1505 , 5 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. 6. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A 7. Prowde the regwred restroom facilities per the CBC Appendix chapter 29. 8. All exit components must comply with the requirements of CBC Chapter 10 (adjoining rooms, rated corridors, door swings, separation of exits, etc ) 9. At the time of tenant improvement plan check submittal (for construction) additional requirements may be required 10 Clearly indicate on the plans compliance with ADA requirements for the disabled. 11 A registered architect must sign and stamp the plans. • ~ C- ~ -~ ~b Page 1 of 3 I 1'I~ ~ B. General Requirements , 1 Submit five conceptual sets of plans~including th'e following a ~ Site/Plot Plan b. Floor Plan o, Foundation Plan , , , d Ceiling, Floor, and Roof Framing Plan 2. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the 'size of main switch, number' tend s¢q ofi service entrance conductors,'panel schedules, and single line diagrams. 3. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location', fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conddioning 4. Planning Department Tracking Number (SUBTPM17594 and DRC2005=00365) must be clearly noted on the Title Sheet of the plans. ' 5. Separate permits are requred for Penang and/or walls. ' 6 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a sods . report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 7. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 8 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Bwiding and Safety Department , C. Site Development Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plates shall be marked with the protect file number (SUBTPM17594 and DRC2005-00365). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Budding and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2 Prior to issuance of budding permits for a new commeraal or industrial development protect or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Budding and Safety Department prior to permit issuance . 3 The Bwlding and Safety Offiaal shall prowde the street addresses after tracUparcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits ~~ -)~~ Page 2 of 3 , 4. Construction activity shall not occur Between the hours of 8 00 p m. and 6 30 a rp ylonday through Saturday, with no construction bn Sunday or holidays. ~ • 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public ' ,counter) D. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be inaccordance with California ~uddmg Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final Grading Plan shall be m substantial conformance with the approved Grading Plan. ' 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to' perform such work ~ ' 3, A geological report shall be prepared by a~qualified Engineer or Geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plamcheck. , 4. At the time of tenant improvement plan check submittal (for construction) additional requirements may be regwred. 5 subm ttedGandl approvedpby theaBuild ng' anid Safety Off c alcpnor to the issuance o bull d ng permits. 6. A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by,a California registered Civil Engineer. Note on title sheet that tenant improvement plans must be submitted for plan check' and be approved prior to construction. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Budding and Safety Department~if you have any questions about the procedure at (909) 477-2710. • ~ C ~ - -~t~ Page 3 of 3 ;~~-~ , Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection ~ ~ _ District ~ ' -- Fire ConstructionServices . STANDARD ~ONDI'TIONS March 30, 2006 Hotel and Commercial Development , NEC of Foothill AND Rochester ' SUBTPM17594 AND DRC2005-00365 , ~: THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. The RCFPD Procedures and Standartls which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at htto //www ci rancho-Cucamonga ca us/firehndex.htm under the Fire Safety Department and Fue Construction Services section Search by article; the preceding number of the standard refers to the article Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard. Hotel construction must comply to all the provision of RCFPD Ordinance 39 for low rise buildings FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial protects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet. b Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: 1 At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect fr6m the public roadways 2 At intersections. 3 On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. 4 As regwred by the Fire Safety Department to meet operational needs of the Fire District 5 A minimum of 40-feet from any building. c If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or budding, . additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fire flow shall be provided d Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of regwred fire flow or fraction thereof. 17,E~~= - t~~ 1~p ~ ~ V ~I ~~ , i ~ w FSC-2 Fire Flow y h 1 The regwred minimum fire flow for thys protect, lrvhen automatic fire sprinklers are ynstalled is 2,250 gallons per minute at a mmirrYum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inc{i Thys flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic, fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoryng Thys requyrement ys made yn accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. ~ ,~ 2. Public fyre hydrants located withyn a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the required fire flow subiect to Fire DistryCt review and approval. Private fyre hydrants on adiacent property shall not be used to provide regwred fyre flow. 3. Firewater plans are required for all protects that mus{ extend the existing water supply to or ~ ' onto the site Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. ~ '~ 4. On all Site Plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site ~ ~ y FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. Pryor to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fyrg sprinkler system, the applicant shall submyt plans, s~eafications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground, supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprynkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fyre Dystrict Ordinance 15, the 2001 C~lyfornia Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards requyre an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance to NFPA 13 to be installed in: 1. Commercial or industryal structures greater than 7,500 square feet ' 2. Assembly and Educational Occupancy Buildings 3 All structures that do not meet Fire District access regwrements (see Fire Access). 4. When regwred fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure. 5 When buiidyngs do not meet the requirements of the 2001 California Bwldyng Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard 9-7 6 When any applicable code or standard requyres the structure to be sprinklered. 7 The hotel must be fully sprynklered in accordance to NFPA 13. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System 1 RCFPD Ordynance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or standards) requyres an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system Refer to RCFPD Ordynances 15 and 39, the California Buylding Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fyre Code 2 Pryor to any removal, remodel, modification and/or addityons to the buildyng or swte's fyre alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a buylding permit must be obtained Plans and specyfications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fyre Alarm Standrd ~ -6 ~ _ , 5 O 3. Based on the number of sprinkler heads; the sprinkler system is regwred to monitored by a listed central station fire alarm system. '~ '' FSC-6 Fire District Site Access • The hotel, Fire District Access must comply to RCFPD standards for low rase budding in accordance to Ordinance 39. ~~ Fire l~istnct access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as wQll as private ' roads, streets dove aisles and/or designated fire lanes 'please reference the RCFPD Fire Lanes Standard 9=7 1 Location of Access All portions,,of the structures 1st story exterior wall Shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the gxterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes m elevation, gates ,and ,~ fences are deemed obstructions. 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are. a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The maximum inside turn radius shall be 20-feet c.' The minimum outside turn radius shall be 46-feet. d. The minimum radws for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width bf traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12 percent. i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). ~ Trees and shrubs planted adtacent to the fire lane shall be kept trammed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3 Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows a In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 Califorrna Bwlding Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b In buddmgs with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or mator fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the regwred access roadways When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all regwred openings • 4 Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all regwred budding exterior openings. ~ E~! -~S) 3 ., '4~. ~ , 5. Commercial/Industrial Gates Any gate installed across,a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire district Standard #9-2 The f911owing design requirements apply , a Prior to the fabrication and Installation of the gates,' plans are requred to lye submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval Upon the completibn of the installation and before plaang the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS , b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inwaF~d. c Gates may be motorized or manual. d When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of~drive access shall be ~0 feet e Manual gates must be ~ egwpped with a RCFPD lock available at the, Fire Safety Office for $20.00 f Motorized gates must open at the rate pf one-foot per second. , g. The mo~onzed gate'actuation mechanisrttl must be egwpped with a manual override deuce and afad-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of powar~failure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motonzed~gates shall be egwpped with a khox'overnde key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex ~. If traffic pre-emption dewces (TPD) are to pe installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 6. Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A Site Plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to Bands for approval 7. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the Site Plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to Bands for plan review. 8. Roof Access: There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buldings on to the roofs of all commensal, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75 feet above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders ,or by an aerial ladder. b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access c. The number of ladder points may be regwred to be increased, depending on the bwlding size and configuration d Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard ~ 4F-152 ;'~ , ~~ , f ), I~ ' e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or othp~r obstructions, • a permanently mounted access ladder is,fegwred f Multiple access ladders may be'~required for larger buildings '' g Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RGFPD Roof Access Standard 9-9 Appendix A and drawings 9=9a and 9-9b. , h. A Site Plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan ~; ~, check. " + ., i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s) ,~ , FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits ' Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application fbr approval ~ ' of the permit, field mspec~ion is required pnor to permit issuance General Use,Permd shall be required for any activity or operation not speafically descnbed below, which in the iudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that maybe hazardpus to life or property. • Battery Systems ~ ' Candles and open flames in public assemblies Compressed Gases • . Public Assembly Cryogenics Dry Cleaning Plants Refrigeration Systems Repair Garages Flammable and Combustible Liquids Spraying or Dipping Operations Hazardous Materials Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures Liquefied Petroleum Gases LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business • Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards. Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga G--~ -t 5 ~ 5 If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building and Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. California Government Code, Section 85850 2 prohibits the City from isswng a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous ~ materials disclosure regwrements. A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used'or stored at the new facility. Any business that operates on rented 'or leased property which is regwred,to submit a plan, it is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subtect to the Business Emergency/Contingency,Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five working days, if requested by the owner. , FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved pnor to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Bwlding, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Co{~struction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District 'Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are regwred on this protect The protect appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided The reciprocal agreement is regwred to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the Site Plan The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, pnor to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office. Reciprocal access agreement -Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and anon-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subtect property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire Distract Reciprocal water covenant -Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general). The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1 Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems. The applicant shall submit construction plans, speafications, flow test data and ca\I~cil~~Onr^s for ~ S p~vate water main system for review • • LJ ~,~, and approval by the Fire 'bistnct Plans and installation ~ shall comply with Fue District Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is regwred . prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Pnvate~ on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be degigned in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10=4. The Budding and Safety Department and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections " All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnof to dalrvenng any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2 Public Water Supply' (Domestic/Fire) Systems ~ The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants Within a 600-foot, radds of the protect. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard 9-8. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and, witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14 feet 6" above the finished surface of the road • 4 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easement$ and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2 Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of'the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire • flow available must meet or exceed the regwred fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. OC~-ISS 4 Fire Sprinkler Momtonng ~~ Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construc)ion Services The fie sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately • following the completion of the fie sprinkler system ($ubiect to the release of power). 5 Fire Suppression Systt:ms and/or other special hazard, protection systems shalli be inspected, tested and accepted by Fie Construction Services before occupancy is 'granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6. ,Fire Alarm System. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fie alarm , system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fie Construction Services. 7 Access Control Gates' Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in, accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fie Construction Services. , 8. dire Access Roadways: Pnor to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fie , access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fie Construction Services. The CC&R's, 'the reaprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fie access roadway map with provisions that prohibit , parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the regwred annual inspections and the maintenance~of alt requied fie access roadways 9 Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certifiicate of Occupancy, commerciaUindustnal and multi-family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during penods of darkness. • When the budding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non- dluminated 6-inch minmum number address shall be provided at the property entrance. Larger address numbers will be requied on buildings Ibcated on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commeraal and industrial bwldings The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all swtes. 10 Hazardous Materials Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fie Department, Hazardous Matenals/Emergency Response and Enforcement Department. The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fie Construction Services 11 Confidential Business Occupancy Information• The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fie Distract "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject bwlding or property. This form must be presented to the Fie Construction Services Inspector 12 Mapping Site Plan. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 1/2 inch by 11 inches or 11 inch by 17 inches Site Plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and bwlding features as regwred in the standard The Site Plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fie Inspector • ~,`~') i i I '' , RESOLUTION NO 06-77 i i • • • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLAIJNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-00365, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MASTER PLAN FOR A MIXED USE OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL CENTER , CONSISTING OF A 112-ROOM HOTEL; TWp RESTAURANT PAD BUILDINGS TOTALING 10,893 SQUARE FEET, ATWO-STORY OFFICE AND RETAIL BUILDING TOTALING 46,000 SQ~IARE FEET, A BANK'AND OFFICE BUILDING TOTALING 6,583 SQUARE FEET AND A GAS STATION WITH CONVENIENCE STOREAND FOOD~COURTTOTALING 8,189 SQUARE FEET ON 8 21 ACRES OF LAND IN THE COMMUNITY ~" COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 4) WITHIN THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORN ER OF FOOTHILL BOULVARD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN,$UPPORT THEREOF - APN 0227-152-18 AND 31. , . A Recitals 1 Charles Joseph Associates flied an,application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred 1b a~"'the application ° 2. On the 9th day of August 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. , 3 All legal prereg4~sites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by,,the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 9, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows. a. The application applies to the properties located at the northeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, with a street frontage of approximately 900 feet on Foothill Boulevard and a lot depth of approximately 400 feet, and b The properties to the north of the subject site is zoned Low Residential and is developed with single-family homes, the property to the south is zoned Industrial Park (Subarea 7) and is comprised of vacant land and the historic Aggazzotti home and former winery site, the property to east is zoned Open Space and is developed with Edison Transmission Towers, and the property to the west is zoned Community Commercial within the Terra Vista Community Plan and is developed with various commercial uses, and c The application pertains to two parcels that are presently vacant with evidence of discing for weed abatement purposes, and IBC--C= -IS7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-77 DRC2005-00365 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 Page 2 d The applicant is proposing to construct a mixed use project that consists of office, hotel, retail, fast food, bank, restaurant and gas station and convenience store, which are either permitted or conditionally permitted uses m the Community Commercial'Distnct (Subarea •) within Foothill Boulevard Districts, and e. The project will promote land use, and economic goals of the Foothill Boulevard Districts by allowing for commercial, hospitality, food, and office uses torbe developed under one land use distract utilizing master-planning that will maximize the economic position of the Foothill Boulevard Corridor and capture;regional demand, and , f The project design incorporates a pedestrian plaza and water features that utilize Route 66 design memorabilia, thereby meeting the design goals of the Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan. 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows. a The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the distract in which the site is located C~ b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or rrlaterially injurious to properties or improvements m the vicinity • c The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Plamm~g Commission finds thatthere is no substantial evidence thatthe project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Gwdelines, Ciiy staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the prolect Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the prolect would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration b The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds. (Q that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared m compliance with CEQA; and (u) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the prolect will have a significant effect on the environment. The Plamm~g Commission furtherfinds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the • Plamm~g Commission Based on these findings, the Plamm~g Commission hereby adopts the Mdigated Negative Declaration E~~ -"jSg ~,y~ , „ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-77 ~ ~ , ~ DRC2005-00365 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES ~~ August 9, 2006 u 1 Page 3 c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mtigation Monitoring Program for the protect that has, been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during protect implementation The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project d Pursuant to'the requirements of Cahfomia Fish and Game Code Section 711 4 and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 753 5, the Planning Commission finds, based on the Initial Study, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, anti considering the record as a whole, that there is no evidence before the City that the proposed protect wdl have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. The protect site ~s disturbed from previous weed abatement activities, the protect site is surrounded by commeraal and residential development, and the site has not been identified as potential location for habitat that is known to support sensitilre biological species. Further, the site contains no blue line streams. Based on substantial evidence, the Planning Commission hereby makes a declaration rebutting the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in California Department of Fish and Game Regulation 753 5 (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulatons Code, Section 753 5 ) e The,,custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the decision of the Planning Commission is based is the Planning Director of the City of • Rancho Cucamonga Those documents are available for public review m the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho,Gucamonga, California 91730, (909) 477-2750 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth'm Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365 is granted contingent"upon approval of Development District Amendment DRC2005-01002, Development Code Amendment DRC2005-01003, and General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006. 2) The protect wdl be developed m accordance with plans on file in the Planning Department as approved and conditioned by the Design Review Committee (DRC) on June 6, 2006, as stated in the Design Review Committee Action Comments Listed below are conditions of approval from the DRC that shall be adhered to during the plan check process a) The base at all pilasters should be 18 to 24 inches wide, subtect to Planning Director review and approval. b) All columns should be uniform and appropriate to each landscape design feature, and different styles of columns at the same architectural element (i a ,water feature) shall be avoided Final design shall be subtect to Planning Director review and approval _ _) S ~~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-77 DRC2005-00365 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 Page 4 ' c) The landscape plant palette shall be a Napa inspired design. The landscape plant palette shall be substantially enhanced with plant material that provides color, variation, and interest. Final design shall be subject~to Planning Director review and approval. d) The colored ribbon gutter in the drive aisles shall be eliminated, and the colored pavement~'areas shall be enhanced to the satisfaction of the Planning Director e) The fenestration patterns on the 6,500 square foot bank/office building shall be modified to reflect a pattern that compliments the architectural style of the center. The window and door patterns shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval 3) The project shall implement the required elements of the Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan. Improvements include the following. i) Install three Route 66 icons in the parkway; 2) Instail specal artwork or district identification at the corner;~3) Repave the street with "Street Pnnt° accent paving material and a Route 66 logo imprinted into the pavement surface at mid-block on the Foothdl~ Boulevard frontage of the project, 4) Install post and cable barrier behind the curb; 5) Add special artwork/icomboth inthe parkway and median 6) Add mosaic murals or state decal file-work inlays, and 7) Install sidewalk to match the Visual Improvement Plan standards. All improvements shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and Planning Dvector during plan check. Location and type of improvements may be modified by the City Engineer or Planning Dvector during plan check in order to allow for site speafic adjustments as needed 4) Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real River rock Manufactured Rroer rock is not permitted Other stone veneers, such as stacked stone, may be manufactured products. 5) The Conditional Use Permit is approved to utilize shared parking A total of 464 parking stalls shall be constructed on the six-parcel project site. 6) The two, freestanding restaurant pad buildings are approved for sit-down dining only and have been parked under the Master Plans' shared parking analysis at the sit-down parking ratio These pads shall not be used for "quwk serve/fast food" restaurants (e g., Starbuck's, Quizno's, McDonalds) unless parking is provided at a ratio of 1 space per 75 square feet of gross lease area, including outside dining. Separate Conditional Use Permit regwred if hard liquor is sold. Drive-thru businesses shall also require a modification to this Master Plan Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365 7) A Uniform Sign Program for the office project shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval The Unfform Sign Program shall be submitted and approved prior to Bwlding Permit issuance. E ~-~.~~ • r ~ LJ ~' • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.O6.77 DRC2005-00365 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 ~ i ' Page 5 ' I i 8) All conditions from Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17594 shall apply ~ , ~ 9) Reaprocal maintenance agreement ensuring toint maintenance of all landscape areas, common ,areas, drives, ~ parking areas shall be , recorded prior, or concurrent with, the final parcel map , 10) Should all buildings not be constructed concurrently„all remaining building pads shall include hydro-seed, interior landscaping and perimeter landscaping to the satisfaction of the Plannng Director.,The , plans submitted for plan check shall include landscape and irrigation plans indicating a 'plant palette and irrigation design for all future , building pads. The final design of the landscaping for any future , building pads shall be subtect to Planning Director rewew and approval during plan check ' 11) All perimeter landscaping along all street frontages and future building pad landscaping shall be completed prior occupancy being granted. EnQlneerlnq Department , 1) Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements to be m accordance with City' "Major Divided Arterial" standards as required and mcluding• • a) Provide or protect curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, street trees, drive approaches, signing and striping. b) Reconstruct curb return/curb and gutter and relocate traffic signal equipment at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue. c) Provide or protect R26(s) "No Stopping" signs along Foothill Boulevard frontage. d) No new median openings in Foothill Boulevard median without a Traffic Signal e) Protector replace traffic signal equipment f) Provide deceleration/right turn lanes for Foothill Boulevard driveways, as required g) The driveway with median shall have two 20-foot wide drive aisles separated by a 10-foot wide median. The median shall not extend into the public right-of-way. h) Signalized driveway must align with proposed driveway on the south side of Foothill Boulevard . i) The Foothill Boulevard frontage shall be designed in accordance with the City adopted Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan including street lights, traffic signal, activity centers, street pavers Route 66 and median 7 E i~ ' ~ lv ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-77 DRC2005-00365 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 ~ Page 6 , ~) Obtain additional streeUsidewalk easements from Southern California Edison and San Bernardino County Flood Control Distract in contunct~on with the proposed easterly right turn lane. k) Pavement reconstruction and overlays v+nll be determined during plan check from Rochester Avenue' to Day Creek Channel Bndge~ ' 2) Rochester Avenue frontage improvements to be m accordance with City "Mator Divided Arterial" standards as regwred and including: a) Provide or protect curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, street trees, dnve approach, traffic signs and strapmg, as regwred., b) ~ Provide a combined northbound busbay/right turn lane on Rochester Avenue for driveway c) Provide or protect R26(s) "No Stopping" signs along Rochester 'Avenue frontage d) Rochester Avenue driveway will be a right turn in and out only Restnpe Rochester Avenue as regwred. e) The driveway with median shall have two 20-foot dnve aisles separated by a 10-foot wide median The median shall not extend into the public right-of-way. f) Protector replace traffic signal equipment. 3) The following are required on-site: a) Provide stacking for four cars (25 feet per car) at the signalized driveway. b) Provide an easement for the maintenance of traffic signal. c) Provide clear lanes for north and south traffic at the signalized drive aisle d) Provide a sign as shown above that reads "Wait Here For Signal" at signalized dnve aisle e) Provide a "Keep Clear" pavement legend. 4) Reconstruct Fennel Road to a reduced radws turn around per City Standard 113, to the satisfaction of the Cary Engineer. 5) The existing overhead utditles (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 KV electrical) on the protect side of Rochester Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole offsite the north protect boundary to the first pole offsite south of ~C~ - IeZ • • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-77 DRC2005-00365 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 . Page 7 ' , ,~ Foothill Boulevard, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street If the developer fads to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improveme~lts being accepted by the City;'all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. ,~ +' , 6) The developer shall construct electrical distribution facddies m accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Municpal Utility requirements and dedicate such facdmes to the Rancho Cucamonga Murncipaf ~~ Utility The Rancho Municipal U~tdity shall be the electrical service prowder'for all prolect related development. 7) This development shall pay the City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency for Parcel APN 0227-152-31 of $150,734.78 and for Parcel APN~ 0227-152-18 of $302,590 26 as part of the 2008-01 CFD improvements The said amounts will increase after September 1 of 2006 as deterrr}ined by the Redevelopment Agency . 8) An in-lieu fee for one-fourth the cost of constructing special pavers within the Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenueiritersection shall be paid to~the City prior to final map recordation. The fee amount shall be based on the square footage of the intersection. 9) Foothill Boulevard Median Island including landscaping and irrigation shall be reconstructed m conjunction with the signalized driveway at the easterly prolect boundary Revise existing Landscape Maintenance District plans accordingly to reflect the above improvements a) This prolect will disrupt an existing City-maintained landscape and irrigation area. Prior to new construction, a joint inspection and documentation of the existing area's condition shall occur with both the new contractor and the City inspector. The existing irrigation system shall be relocated as needed and any damaged landscaping replaced to the satisfaction of the City Engineer At this point, the new construction contractor shall be responsible for maintenance of both the new and existing areas. The developer shall assume maintenance responsibility for the altered landscape area fora minimum of 90 days after reconstruction. A follow-up inspection of both areas is required prior to the City's acceptance of the new area 10) Provide a 12-foot wide storm dram easement to be dedicated to the City on the Tentative Parcel Map. . a) Provide two sump catch basins and laterals m Fennel Road and shall be designed to handle Q100 ~C~~ lle3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-77 DRC2005-00365 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 Page 8 ' ~ . b) The storm drain shall be reinforced concrete pipe and shall be 0100 design No treatment structures allowed in City's storm ' dram ~' 11) The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) submitted with tentative map application has been reviewed and found to be substantially complete Include the Best Management Practices (BMp'S) identified in the plan on Grading Plans when submitted for Technical Plan Check. Environmental Mitioation Aesthetics 1) A Photometric diagram shall be submitted and approved prior to Bwlding Permit issuance demonstrating that illumination from the protect is confined within the protect's boundaries and meets the City's foot candle regwrements Air Quality 1) All construction egwpment shall be maintained m good operating'. ' condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and • maintained as per manufacturers'speafications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment wdl be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed bythe South Coast Air Quality Management District ,(SCAQMD), as well as City Planning Staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads . Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. D, E,tF- ~~o ~-f PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-77 ~ ' DRC2005-00365 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 , ~ • ,Page 9 • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil dunng and after the end of work periods ., Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ' ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a 'schedule, establishetl by the City if silt is carried over to adfacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Suspend grading operations dunng high words (i e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch frgeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means , 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and the Regional Water Quality Control Board ' ~ [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. ', • 7) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews wdl shut off egwpment when not in use 10) All industrial and commercial faalities shall post signs requmng that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be regwred to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas 13) All industrial and commercal site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be requued to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. • 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be regwred to incorporate high-effiaency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters ~ ~ ,i -~~5 I')~ I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-77 DRC2005-00365 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 Page 10 ~ 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to ~ , incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Cultural Resources ~ , 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will'retam a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With,the assistance bf the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will. ' • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the, City to establish its archaeological value. • , Consider establishing provisibns to req,uue incorporation of archaeological situ within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • ~ Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage ,, • • Propose mitigation rrleasures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect ~ effects on significant, • important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriatg CEQA gwdehnes • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide speafic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has • completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find 7 C- ri-' - 1 ~i6 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06=77 DRC2005-00365 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 ~ . Page 11 , • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for ' documentation in the summary report and transfer to an , ~ appropriate depository (i ~ ,San Bernardino County Museum) • Submit a summary report to the City, of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to' the San Bernardino County Museum ' Geology and Sods ~ ~ ' ' 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RW QCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible ' 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions assoaated with vehicle tracking of sod off~site. "timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such • episodes 4) Chemical 'soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive fdr 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Hydrology and Water Quality , 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official forapproval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activties are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize sod exposure to rainy periods experienced m southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration • program within a specified time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. l~ E,~ ~ l lad PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-77 DRC2005-00365 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES ` August 9, 2006 ~ Page 12 ~ ~ ' ~. • 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning wdl be ~ , performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks, to control dust m order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from ' the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified m the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Assoaatetl Engineers,, June 9, 2005, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical , 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and ' minimizing the use of fertilizers/pestiades/herbiades Landscaped, , areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stAble growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a~mmimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval poor to the issuance, of Grading Permits. 7) Ponding areas on the south side of, the,prolect are depressed to promote the retention and infiltration of treated runoff and irrigation water ~~ 8) Rooftops drain to landscaping prior to entering storm dram system. • 9) Collection'mletsyrovided with trash guard/grate , 10) Rinker Stormcepter installed to treat water before entering infiltration area 11) Prior to issuance of Bwldmg Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm dram system to the maximum extent practicable. The W QMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 12) Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Bwldmg Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit u 1~) ' i L PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06J7 ~ ~ ,, DRC2005-00365 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES , August 9, 2006 ~~ h Page 13 „ .. Noise 1) Exterior An 8-foot high masonry wall shall be constructed along the north property Ime in order to provide a„sound attenuation and privacy between the single-family dwelling units to ttYe north and the protect 2) Interior All south facing windows and glass doors in the hotel building shall have an STC rating of 32 or greater , 3) A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director rewew and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 40 dBA for, ,, , the hotel rooms, the budding materials and construction techniques regwred ~ The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained m thy, final report , M 4 4) Construction or grading shall ,ftot take place between the hours of 8.00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time,on Sunday or a national holiday. ^ " 5) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified m Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at • the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as speafied m Development Code Section 17 02.120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Bwldmg Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Bwldmg Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Budding Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced m intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 6) The perimeter block wall along the north property Ime shall be constructed as early as possible. 7) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8'00 p m. and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily taps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. ,~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-77 DRC2005-00365 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9,, 2006 Page 14 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF AUGUST 2006.' PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU~AMONGA BY• ' Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular mee0ng of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of August 2006, by the following vote-to-wit:, AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES. COMMISSIONERS• ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS ~C~-~-zo • r 1 L J ,1 ' _ ° COMMUNI~TY~ DEVELOPMENT ~ ~ - '. ,DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-00365' ' SUBJECT: MASTER PLAN FOR OFFICE, RETAIL, HOTEL, RESTAURANT, GAS STATION WITH ' CONVENIENCE STORE APPLICANT: CHARLES JOSEPH AND ASSOCIATES LOCATION: APN 0227-152-182 AND 31 ' ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: •A. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or In the altematrve, to relinquish such approval The appllcant shall reimburse the City Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at Its own expense In the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve appllcant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 06-77, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties Involved in the ctinstructionlgradmg activities and are not required to be wet sealedlstamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect i B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire tf building permits are not Issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code . regulations ~ ~~~~~~~ I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2005-00365 Std Cond 8-09 doc Comvletion Date _f_~f- -~-~- D. } ~ Protect No DRt;2005-00365 ' ~ Comolehon Date ~ , 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ , of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaation of the Planning Director i ll Uniform Buildin Cade and h t t l ' ~ /~ 3 g suc ime as a up l Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence _ State Fire Marshal regulations have been compiled with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be ' submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract and the Building and Safety i ' Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected, for compliance prior to, occupancy ~ ~ , 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all (jonditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ ' submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits ' 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ~~_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, ' building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a Custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first , 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Coda, all ~~T other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance ~ 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building ~~ , permits Such plan shall indicate style, illiiminatipn, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adtacent properties. 8 Trash receptacle(sj are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and ~~_ the number of trash receptacles shall be subtect to~Planning Director review and approval poor to the issuance of building permits 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be ~~~ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director: For , single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, ~~_ including proper illumination 11 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property ~___/_ homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape owner , , maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits Shopping Centers 1 A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, ~~_ free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc ,shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 2 Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the _/~ Planning Director a Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the protect) ~_/_ b Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to _/~_ include self-closing pedestrian doors c Large enough to accommodate two trash bins ~~~ ~ 2 ~ ~-j1 "_~ 7 Z I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM~2006 Res & Stl Rpt\DRC2005-00365 Std Cond B-09 doc I11 ' ~~ `r Protect N ~ I o DRC2005-00365 Comolehon Date d Roll-up doors ' ~ i -/-/- . i e Trash bins with counter-weighted lids ,, -~~- f Archltecturallytreateil overhead shade trellis i~~- i, ' g Chain fink screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the~enclosure and designed -/~- to be hidden from view ' 3 Trash collection shall occur between the hours of 7 a m 'and 7 p m only ~~- 4. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours -~-~- 5 The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and In no event shall trash and _J~- debris remain for more than 24 hours ,,~ 6 Stgns shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking°,and for °employee parking only " ~~_ 7 All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which ,~ shall be Incorporated Into the lease agreements for III tenants a Noise Level -All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an ~-/- exterior noise level of 60 d6 during the hours of i0 p m until 7 a m and 65 dB during the hours of l a m until 10 p m b Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or ~_/- other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building Materials, garbage cans, or other similar obfects between the hours of 10 p m. and 7 a m. unless otherwise specrfied herein, In a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area 8. Textured pavement shall be provided across' circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza n b h t h ~-/- • i a io ycom Theyshall be of brick/tlle pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or a thereof Full samples shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the Issuance of building permits ii 9 All future bwlding pads shall be seeded and irrigated for erosion control Detailed plans shall be ~~- Included In the landscape and irrigation plans to be submitted for Planning Department approval poor to the Issuance of budding permits ' 10 The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program It shall include the plaza ~~- area fighting fixtures, budding fighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot fighting fixtures 11 All future protects within the shopping center shall be designed to be compatible and consistent ~~- wlth the architectural program established 12 Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed Into the building faces and shall not extend Into ~~- the pedestrian walkways The design details shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director prior to the Issuance of bwlding permits E. Bui lding Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/-/- prolections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally Integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Details shall be included In building plans 2. For commercial and Industrial protects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main ~~- building colors s D~I~' ^113 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2005-00365 Std Cond 8-09 doc PrgeM No DRC2005-00365 Comoletwn Data F, Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) ~' 1~ All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long W hen a side of any parking space abuts' _/_/~ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 ~ QII parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimensiori of 6 feet and shag' ~~_ contain a 12-inch walk adtacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards atitl all driveway aisles, entrances, ~~_ and ewts shall, be striped per City standards 4 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more ~___/_ parking stalls Designate two percent o~~one stall,, whichever is greater, of the total number of , stalls for use by the handicapped 5 MtStorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more ~ ~~_ parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the ' rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet. G. Trip Reduction Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided In all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily ~~_ residential protects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces Warehousedistribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher • whole number , Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for ~~ commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area. If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet Transit improvements such as bus shelters on Rochester Avenue, bus pullouts, and bus pads ~~_ shall be provided Bus shelters shall also include a bench, a trash receptacle, and an adtoining ' bike rack (minimum 3 capacity) on a concrete pad Bus shelter shall be located outside public ~' right-of-way and shall be privately maintained H. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping In ~_/ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval In the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial protects, and a minimum of 30% within commercial and office protects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. 3 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls 4. Trees shall be planted In areas of public view adtacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building t7 ~-fF -~ -1 ~~ ~~- ~~ ~~- • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM~2006 Res & Sd Rpt\DRC2005-00365 Std Cond 8-09 doc ,yy , ~ Protect N ' o DRC2005-00365 ' ~ ,+ Comoletion'Date' 5 All prvate slopes of 5 feet or more In vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but lessithan 2 1 _/~_ , shall be, at minimum, Irrigated and land§caped with appropriate ground cover for erosion slope . , control Slope planting required by this section shall InCludq a permanent irrigation system to be Installed by the developer prior to occupancy ~ 6 All private slopes in excess bf 5 feet, but less than 8 feet In vertlcal height and of 2 1 or greater ~ ~ _/~ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq tt of slope area l -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq tt of slope area, and appropriate groun~i,cover In addition, slope banks , in excess of 8 feet In vertlcal height and 2 1 or greater slope shhall also Include one 5-gallon or , ' larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in ' nting required by this section shall staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slb'pe pl'a Include a permanent Irrlgatlon system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 7 For multi-family residential and non-residential development; property owners are responsible fbr ~~_ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas .. within the public right-of-way Ail landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained In healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, ' and tramming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or depaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage B The final design df the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and Sidewalks shall be Included in ~~_ ' the required landscape plans and shall be subfect to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway I~~ndscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department + 9. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering _/~_ sidewalks (with horizontal change), and Intensified landscaping, Is required along Foothill Boulevard 10 Landscaping and Irrigation systems requlred to be Installed within the public right-of-way on the _/~_ perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 11 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the ~~_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department 12. Landscaping and Irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of ~_/_ Xeriscape as defined In Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code I. Sig ns ' 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval ~~_ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Slgn Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to Instaliatlon of any signs. 2 A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for Planning Director review and ~~_ approval prior to issuance of building permits. J. Environmental 1 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the _/~ Issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and If approprlate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained In the final report 2 The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of ~~ the acoustical report were Implemented in construction, Including measurements of interior and 5 ~ C-~- ~`7S I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2005-00365 Std Cond 8-09 doc I 1 Project No DRC2b05-00365 Comoletion DAte exterior noise levels to document compliance with Ciry standards Certification shall be submitted to the Bwlding & Safety Department~prior to final ocbupancy release of the affected, homes 3 Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to ' post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the, amount of $495 00 pnor to the issuance of budding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures ,These fonds maybe used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit K. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure~for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permts ~ ~ , APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND $AFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) SEE ATTACHED. ~PLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: , L. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 73 total feet on Foothill Boulevard 50 total feet on Rochester Avenue • 2 Corner property brie cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 3 Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or pnor to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved 4 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring toint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 5 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map 6 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City /_/_ i -/--f- ~~- ~~- ~~- _l-/- ~~- -/-/- J~- ~~- 6 ~\EF .1-1(0 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMMi2006 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2005-00365 Std Cond 8-09 doc ,~ Prolec[ Na DRC2005-00365 7 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet Measured from the face of curbs i ' g The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Sections 66462 and 66462 5 at such time as the City decides to acquire the property interests required for thA improvements Such agreement shall providefor payment by tlje developer of all costs incurred 4v the City if the City decides to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with ' the subdivision Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given In an appraisal report obtained by the City, at developer's cost, The appraiser shall have been approved by the Ciry prior to commencement of the appraisal This condition applies In particular, but not limited to Southern California Edison Company, San Bernardino County Flood Control Distract M'. Street Improvements Pursuant to Ciry Council~Resolution No 88-557, no p(?rson shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated bytechnical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy.con~ections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development, Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvmt Sitle- walk Drive Appr Street Lights $treeY Trees Comm Trell Median islantl 91ke Trail Other Foothill Boulevard X X X X X X X Rochester Avenue X X X X X X (e) Notes (a) Median Island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item (e) Busbay Improvement Plans and Construction a Street Improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and Intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer and the Clty Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street Improvements, prlorto final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Pnor to any work being performed in public nght-of-way, fees shall be paid and,a construction permit shall be obtained from the Clty Engineer's Office In addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and Interconnect conduit shall be Installed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer Cif - 1 ~? 7 7 Comolehon Date -/_/_ , +/-/~ ~~- _/_/~ ~~. ~-/- ~-/- •~_ I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCDMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2005-00365 Std Cond 8-09 doc Prgect No DRC2005-00365 Completion Date d ,Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be Installed with any new construction or reconstructron _/_/_ project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals ancy t t d f , si e ou ee •~ Interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes ' " 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at Intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum,of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the Clty Engineer duit shall be 3-Inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as speafied. C on 2) e Handicapped access ramps shall be Installed on all corners of intersections per City ~~_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer , f Existing Clty roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with ~_/_ adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash ' ,, '~ deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be ~~ installed to Clty Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan ~_1- check 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be Installed per Clty Standards In ~ ~~_ accordance with the City's street tree program „ LJ e I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2005-00365 Std Cond 8-09 doc I, ~ ,,)I ~ i ~ Protect No DRCt2005-00365 , , Comolet,on Date ~~ i Install street trees per Clty street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction noteslshall appear on the title page of tNe street improvement plans Street improvement plans, shall irticlude a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation In those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Prolect'Englneer Common Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Neme Name Space Spacing Size Oty Foothill Boulevard Lagerstroemia Crape 3 feet 15 feet ~ 24 FILL IN Indica Myrtle ~ . O Inches 'Muskogee' Hybrid- Triangular box Lavender ~ Spacing Foothill Boulevard Non Activity Prunus bhreiana NCN 3 fget 20 feet 15 Centers-Accent Tree O C gallon Informal groupings not more ~'~ than 25 percent of ~' total , frontage trees Non Activity Centers Plantanus California 8 feet 35' feet 15 racemosa,, Sycamore ' O C gallon ~ Informal groupings Non Activity Centers Plantanus London 8 feet 30 feet 15 ' acerifolla Plane Tree O C gallon Informal groupings Rochester Avenue Foreground Rhus lances African 5 feet 20 feet 15 Sumac O C gallon Formal Background Brachychiton Bottle Tree 8 feet 25 feet O C 15 gallon populneus Informal Construction Notes for Street I rees 1) All street trees are to be planted In accordance with Clty standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City Inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backflll Boll amendments, as determined by the Clty Inspector 3) All street trees are subject to Inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public Improvement plans only DCF-I-l~j ~, ~-~. • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMMt2006 Res 8 StF Rpt\DRC2005-00365 Std Cond 8-09 doc I 1~`I 1 ~ 11 Protect No DRC2005-00365 6 Intersection Ilne of sight designs shall be reviewed by the Clty Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways Local residentiaP street intergections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as rgquired N. Public Maintenance Areas A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans p2r Engineiering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other afeas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance Distract Foothill Boulevard Median Island A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Distracts shall be filed with the City l=ngineer prior to final map approval or tssuance of budding permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan, Including Traffic Signal, Median Island, Stfeet Ughts and Activity Centers ~ O. Drainage and Flood Control '' 1 A fin;31 drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal bf surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas P. Improvement Completion 1 If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the Cdy will be required for Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue Curb/Gutter, sidewalk, street lights, street trees, drive approaches, signing/ striping, under grounding, signal equipment and busbay O. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the regwrements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects i~t~-- ~~-~S~ ,o i \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMMt2006 Res 8 Stf Rpt\DRC2005-00365 Std Cond 8-09 doc Completion bate _/_J- ~~- _J~_ ~-/. ~~~ ~-/. ~~. J~- ~~- ~~- .,~ ' ~ Protect N o DRC2005-00365 ' , Comoletwn Date 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other Interested agencies Involved _/~_ Approval of the final parcel map well be subfec1 to any requirements that may be received from , them i I I R. General Requirements and'Approvals ' 1 Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of-way SOuthera ~_/_ ' Calrfornia Edison Company 2 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all ~~_ new streetlights for the first,slx months of operation, prier to final map approval or prior to building permit Issuance rf no map Is Involved 3 Prior to the Issuance of building permits, a Dlversio~ Deposit and related administradve.fees shall ~~._ , be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit Is fully refundable Ii at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from I~ndfills, and appropriate documentation Is provided to the Clty Form CD-1 shall be submitted to , the Engineering Department when the first budding permrt application is submitted to Budding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the EnginAering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2600, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: S. ~ Security Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power ~~_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 All buildings shall have mihimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with ~_/~ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development ' 3 Lighting In exterior areas shall be In vandal-resistant fixtures. -J-/_ T. Security Hardware 1 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be Installed on all entrance doors If windows are within _J~ 40 Inches of any Locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 2 All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either von bars, metal gates,' ~~_ or alarmed U. Windows 1 Storefront windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic ~-~ 2 Security glazing Is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and Impede ~ /_ entry to burglars V. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime ~_/ vislbihty ^~ 11 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMMt2006 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2005-00365 Std Cond 8-09 doc Protect No DRC2005-00365 ' Comolenon Date 2 Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development They shall be _/~- • a minimum of three feet in length and two feet In width and of contrasting color to background ~ . , The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department PLANNINGTSERV CES ATT(9 9) 477 2 70, FOR OMPLIANCEEWITH ITH~ FOLLOW NG CONDITIONS: , SEE ATTACHED . t 12 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & SH Rpt\DRC2005-00365 Std Cond 8-09 doc i,`i` , ~ ' ~ 1 ~ ~ ` ~ , 1 I ~ , I I , - ~ ~ Rancho Cucamonga Community, Development, • ~, _ ~~ , ' Building & Safety, „ ~, COMMERCIAUINDUSTRIAL STANDARD CONDITIONS '' March 30, 2006 ~ ~ ~,~ , Hotel & Commercial Development NEC of Foothill & Rochester SUBTPM17594 & DRC2005-00365 ~ ~ ~ ' NOTE: Any revisions may void these requirements and necessitate additional review. A. New Structures 1. Prowde compUance with the California Budding Cbde (CBC) for property Ime clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistroe construction 2 The protect shall be designed to comply with the 2001 California Budding Codes (CBC), the California Fire Code and with RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39 3 Prowde compliance with the California Bwldmg Code fpr required occupancy separations , 4. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC Section 1505 5. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the requred fire rating m accordance with CBC Table 5-A , 6 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. 7 Prowde the regwred restroom facilities per the CBC Appendix chapter 29. 8 All exit components must comply with the requirements of CBC Chapter 10 (adjoining rooms, rated corridors, door swings, separation of exits, etc ). 9 At the time of tenant improvement plan check submittal (for construction) additional requirements may be regwred. 10 Clearly indicate on the plans compliance with ADA requrements for the disabled. 11 A registered architect must sign and stamp the plans. F -~~~ ~ ~,e-~ Page 1 of 3 ` i , '1' I • B. General Requirements 1 Submit five conceptual sets of plans including the following a ~ Site/Plot Plan ', ' b. Floor Plan ' c. Foundation Plan d. Ceiling, Floor, and Roof Framing Plan 2 Electncal Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of a ms , service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagr 3 a and heating and a~ sr in e c dl a e r gas pip g fixture unt ation, lo c system sept oW diagram9 sewe condibornng 4 Planning Department Tracking Number~,(SUBTPM17594 and DRC2005-00365) must be clearly noted on the Title Sheet of the plans ' 5. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. ' 6. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils re are requued pnor to plan check t " " signa u wet report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and submittal 7 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by 8 Business the Budding and Safety Department , C. Site Development ' 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plahs shall be marked with the protect file number (SUBTPM17594 and DRC2005-00365). The applicant rdinances,l andtregulatonssin effect at thellt~me ofCpermit applicaltionheContact theeBuddmg and Safety Department for avadabdity of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Pnor to issuance of budding permits for a new commercial or mdustnal development protect or mator addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, shall p ov de a opy lof tthen chool fees race ptto the Bw d ng and Safety Departmentpprliorto permit issuance • 3 The Building and Safety Offiaal shall provide the street addresses after tracUparcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. t~ ErF -l~3`~ Page 2 of 3 ICI' I 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a,m ,Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Suriday or holidays , • 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public counter) • D. Grading ~ ~ ~ ~ , 1. Grading of the subtect property shall be irl accordance with California wilding Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final Grading Plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved Grading Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Geologist and submitted at the time of application for,grading plan check 4 At the time of tenant improvement plan check submittal (for construction) additional regwrements may be regwred. 5. The final Grading Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be pompleted, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official pnor to the issuance of bwlding permits. 6 A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Cahforrna registered Croil Engineer. Note on title sheet that tenant improvement plans must be submitted for plan check and be approved pnor to construction The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact •the Bulding and Safety Department if you have any questions about the procedure at (909) 477-2710. ~E~ -1`35 Page 3 of 3 w4 ~ , Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection _ District ' ' Fire Construction Services STANDARD CON'DI,TIONS March 30, 2006 Hotel and Commercial Development ~ , NEC of Foothill AND Rochester SUBTPM17594 AND DRC2005-00365 , THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. The RCFPD Procedures and Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at htto //www a rancho-Cucamonga ca t~s/fire/index htm finder the Fire Safety Department and Fire Con'structipn Services section Search by article, the preceding number of the standard refers to the article Chose the appropriate article nufnber then a drop down menu will appear, select thA corresponding standard • Hotel construction must comply to all the brovision of RCFPD Ordinance 39 for low rise bwldings , • FSC-1 Public and Private.Water Supply Design gwdelines for Fire Hydrants: The followirig provides design gwdelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commerciaUindustrial protects is 300-feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet , b Fire hydrants are'to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: 1 At the entrance(s) to a commeraal, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways. 2. At intersections 3 On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. 4 As required by the Fire Safety Department to meet operational needs of the Fire District 5 A minimum of 40-feet from any bwlding. c If any portion of a facility or bwlding is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, . additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fire flow shall be provided d Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of requued fire flow or fraction thereof ~~~~-~8~ FSC-2 Fire Flow , ~ 1. The required minimum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 2,250 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adapted by the Fire 4istnct Ordinances 2.' Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of 4he proposed protect may be used to provide the 'requued fire flow subject to Firs District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adfacent property shall not be used to provide regwred fire flow. 3. Firewater plans are regwred for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 4 On all Site Plans to be submitted for review, sP~ow all fue hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site. ~ , FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler System, the applicant shall submit plans, s~eafications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systerhs Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards regwre an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance to NFPA 13 to be installed in 1. Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet. 2 Assembly and Educational Occupancy Buildings 3. All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (see Fire Access). 4 When required fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure. 5 When buildings do not meet the requirements of the 2001 California Building Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard 9-7 6 When any applicable code or standard requires the structure to be spnnklered. 7 The hotel must be fully spnnklered in accordance to NFPA 13 FSC-5 Fire Alarm System ' 1 RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or standards) requres an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system. Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Building Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code 2 Prior to any removal, remodel, modification and/or additions to the budding or suite's fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a budding permit must be obtained Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 VII C- r` - ~ ~ 7 2 • • C~ 3 Based on the number of sprinkler headls, the sprinkler system is required tq monitored by • a listed central station fire alarm system ~ ' FSC-6 Fire District Site Access The hotel, Fire District Access must comply to RCFPD standafds for low rise bwlding m accordance to Ordinance 39. Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets' and highways, as well as prrvate roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fve lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Lanes Standard 9-7 ~ ~ ' ~ ' 1 Location of Access All portions,of the structures 1st story' exterior wall Shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the ' exterior of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are• , a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 20-feet, c ~ The minimum outside tum radius shall be 46-feet. d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. • e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. f At any private entry median, the minimum wiiith'of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12 percent. i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). ~. Trees and shrubs planted adiacent to the fire lane shall be kept trammed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 3 Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows a In bwldings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided m accordance with the 2001 California Bwlding Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b In bwldings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided m each 100 lineal feet or mafor fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the regwred access roadways When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fue Distract access to all regwred openings 4 Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all regwred building exterior openings. 3 5. Commercial/Industrial Gates shall be in accordance with requirements apply Any gate installed across ~ Fire Department access road Fire District Standard #9-2 The following design Prior to the fabrication and irtistallation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Sernces (FCS) for approval Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from,FCS ~ , a ,b c d. Gates must slide open hor¢ontally or swing inward. Gates may be motorized or manual ~ ' When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of'dnve access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the,Fire Safety ' Office for $20 00. , f. Motorized gatgs must open at the rate of one-foot per second g The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be egwpped with a manual override device and afail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motorized~gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. i For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. ~ If traffic pre-emption devices (TPp) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be requred due to complexity of the various entry configurations 6 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A Site Plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to Bands for approval 7 Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the Site Plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to Bands for plan review 8. Roof Access: There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the bwldings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75 feet above the level of the fire access road. a This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in bwldings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access c The number of ladder points may be regwred to be increased, depending on the bwlding size and configuration d Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard ~~ 4 t F -1S~1' • I n LJ • ~~~ i~ , J ,~ e Where the entire roof access is re~trrcted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, • a permanently mounted access ladder is required f. Multiple access ladders may be"requred for larger bwldings ~' • g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the R~FPD Roof Access Staridard 9-9 Appendix A and drawings 9'-9a and 9-9b ' h. A Site Plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. ~~ i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s) FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits ~ ~~ Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or budding construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval ~' of the permit, field inspection is requued prior to permit issuance General Use ,Permit shall be regwred for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that maybe hazardpus to life or property • Battery Systems ~~ • Candles and open flames in public assemblies '~ • Compressed Gases • Public Assembly ' • Cryogenics Dry Cleaning Plants Refrigeration Systems Repair Garages • Flammable and Combustible Ligwds • Spraying or Dipping Operations • Hazardous Materials • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • Liquefied Petroleum Gases • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Bwldings FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San . Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance. The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga s 1 If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Budding and Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 85850.2 . prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure requirements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be requred if regulation substances are to be ' used or stored at the new facility. 2 Any business that operates on rented~'or leased property which is regwred to submd a ~~ plan, it is also required to submit a notice to the owner,~of the property in writing stating that the busme$s is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency,Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions. The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within froe working days, if requested by the owner , FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Bwlding, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District 'Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation 1 RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this project The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the Site Plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office. Reciprocal access agreement -Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and anon-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire Distract to gam access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other 'structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire Distract Reciprocal water covenant -Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general). The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to . the issuance of any building permits: 1 Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review ~~~ - ~~` and approval by the Fire ~bistnct Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards Approval of the on-site (priyate) fire underground and water plans is requved . prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on•site combination domestic and fire supplysystem must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4. The~Building and Safety Department and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections All private on-sde fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor,to deGvenng any combustible framing materials to th'e site. Fire construction Services will inspect the ' ~ fnstallation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply' (Domestic/Fire) Systems ~ The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, shtlw all existing fire hydrants wdhin a 600-foot radius of the protect Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard 9-8 All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Rre Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14 feet 6" above the finished surface of the road 4 Fire Flow• A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements• All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino , PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fue hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2 Private Fire Hydrants. For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of'the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the regwred fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3. Fire Sprinkler System• Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. ~~ - t~2 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring` Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of ,Occupancy, the fire spnnkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services , The fire spnnkler morntoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately • following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power) 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is 'granted and/or egwpment is placed in service 6. ,Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certficate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested ar)d accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services , 8. dire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. ' The CC&R's, 'the reciprocal agreement and)or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, speafy the method of enforcerh'ent and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 9. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commerciaVindustrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness. When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non- illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be required on bwldings located on wide streets or bwlt with ' large setbacks inmulti-tenant commercial and industrial buildings. The swte designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all swtes. 10. Hazardous Materials. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Department The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services 11. Confidential Business Occupancy Information. The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information° form This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subiect building or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 12. Mapping Site Plan• Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 1/2 inch by 11 inches or 11 inch by 17 inches Site Plan of the site in accordance with' RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as regwred in the standard. The Site Plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. • 17C~ ~~G3 RESOLU~T'ION NO 06-78 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO ~ , CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCF~ DRC2005-01124, A REQUEST TO ALLOW A BUILDING HEIGHT OF 54 FEET WHERE A MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT OF 45 FEET IS ALLOWED; FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MASTER PLAN FOR AN OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL CENTER ON 8.21 ACRES OF LAND IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 4), WITHIN THE FOOTHILL BdULEVARD DISTRICTS; LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULVARD AND ROCHESTERl~VENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0227,152-18 AND 31. A. Recitals ' 1 Charles Joseph Associates fled an application for the issuance of Variance DRC2005-01124 as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Variance request is referred to as "the application " ~ ~ 2 On the 9th day of August 2006, the Planing Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. ~~ B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of • the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct , 2. Based upon .the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public hearing on August 9, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby spenfically finds as follows: a The application applies to the property located at the northeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, with a street frontage of approximately 900 feet on Foothill Boulevard and a lot depth of approximately 400 feet, and b The property to the north of the subtect site is zoned Low Residential and is developed with single-family homes, the property to the south is zoned Industrial Park (Subarea 7) and is comprised of vacant land and the historic Aggazzotti home and former winery site; the propertyto east is zoned Open Space and is developed with Edison Transmission Towers; and the property to the west is zoned Community Commeraal within the Terra Vista Community Plan and is developed with various commernal uses, and c The Variance request is to allow a maximum building height of 54 feet where a maximum height of 45 feet is permitted, and d Literal enforcement of the building setback would cause a physical hardship and practical difficultly for development of the property by requiring the tower elements in the office building and the roofline and tower elements in the hotel to be reduced in order to meet the 45 height limitation The D, E F - ley '1~ ' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-78 , DRC2005-01124 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 Page 2 ~ ~ Development Code encourages architectural,features and rcoflines that create visual interest when the design of these features will not negatively impact the adjacent properties The hotel bwlding has been designed to be sensitive to the adjacent residential neighborhood by utd¢mg a floor plan that is briented on a north to'south axis so that no guest rooms face the single-family dwellings to the north Further, as required by the Development Code, the two-story, office building has been designed with a rooflme that is limited to 25 feet within 100 feet of the residential neighborhood to the north; and e. There are exceptional circumstances applicable to the subyect property that do not apply to a majority of other properties in the immediate surrounding area because of the fact that the project has been designed to be graded approximately S feet below the existing glade elevations of the neighborhood north of the project site. With the factoring of the 5-foot grade'differential, the net budding height results in ' the office building having a height of'43 feet and the hotel building having a height of 49 feat when compardd to the average house pad elevations of the neighborhood to the north, and , f. Literal enforcement of the building setback would deprive the applicant of development enjoyed by other properties in the same zone by regwring the applicant to redesign and lower the architectural focal points that provide wsual interest anc) are customary to winery-inspired architecture, which is contradictory to the design gwdelines Foothill Boulevard Distract that encourage multrplaned, pitched roofs and towers as focal elements, and ' ' ~ g. The granting of the Variance will not constitute a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same,zone because there are unique site conditions (i e., grade differential between the proposed project and the existing neighborhood to the north) Further, the architectural design of the project employs gbod use of towers and multi-planed roofs, which is an architectural design goal of the Foothill Boulevard Distracts, and h. Granting of the Variance for a parking setback will not be detrimental to the public healtf~, safety, or welfare since the master planned project has been designed utilizing site planning techniques that take into account building massing, orientation, placement and landscape buffering. The office bwlding has been designed with a rooflme that is stepped back from the residences, the hotel budding has been designed with a floor plan that is oriented on a north to south axis so that no guest rooms face the single-family dwellings to the north, and there is a 15-foot wide landscape planter and an 8-foot high perimeter wall along the north property line that will provide buffering These site Plan design features will ensure that the public health, safety, and welfare of the adjacent single-family neighborhood will not be negatively impacted 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows. a That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the speafied regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code b. That there are exceptional or extraordinary arcumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same distract c That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprave the applicant of pnwleges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same distract ~c~ ~ CGS PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-78 DRC2005-01124 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 Page 3 ~ d That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of speaal privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. , e. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental tp the public health, safety, or welfare'or materially mlurious to properties or improvements m the vicinity 4~ Based upon the facts and information contained m the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports mcluded~for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial eviderce that the prolect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated' herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Gwdelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the protect Based on the findings contained m that Initial Siudy, City stafNdetermined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the protect would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds• (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared m compliance with CEQA, and (n) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the prolect will have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent tudgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Momtonng Program for the prolect that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during protect implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the protect. d Pursuant to the requirements of California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 753 5, the Planning Commission finds, based on the Initial Study, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and considering the record as a whole, that there is no evidence before the City that the proposed prolect will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends The prolect site is disturbed from previous weed abatement activities, the prolect site is surrounded by commeraal and residential development, and the site has not been identified as potential location for habitat that is known to support sensitive biological species. Further, the site contains no blue Ime streams Based on substantial evidence, the Planning Commission hereby makes a declaration rebutting the presumption of adverse effect as set forth m California Department of Fish and Game Regulation 753 5 (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Code, Section 753.5 ) e The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the decision of the Planning Commission is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review m the Planning Department of the City of Rancho . Cucamonga located at 10500 Crnc Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, (909) 477-2750. n~ - 1r'1(n • '~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-78 DRC2005-01124 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 Page 4 r 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below. Planning Department ~~ 1) The Variance approval shall expire if the Bwlding Permits are not issued within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed. 2) All applicable Conditions of Approval per Resolution No. 06-77 approving Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365 shall apply. " 3) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or m the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition Environmental Mdigation • Aesthetics 1) A Photometric diagram shall be submitted and approved prior to Building Permit issuance demonstrating that illumination from the protect is confined within the protect's boundaries and meets the City's foot candle requirements. Air Quality 1) All construction egwpment shall be maintained m good operating condition so ~' as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that ail construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per ,, manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available atthe construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, orthat their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or • high-volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1108 7C-F - ~~t1 ~y, f PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-78 DRC2005-01124 - CHARLES JOS$PH ASSOCIATES ~' ' August 9, 2006 ~ ~' Page 5 , ~ ~ ~ 5) All construction equipment shall'comply with SCAQMD, Rules 402 and 403 ~ . Adddionally, contractors shall include thA following provisions. , i' Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. , , I • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. ~ '~ • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time ., , Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. , ,' Dispose of surplus excavated material m accordance with local ordinances and use sound enginepnng practices. • Sweep streets according to a ,schedule, established by the City if silt is carped over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depe,ndmg upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 regwrements. , • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or • , , cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means , ~ 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and the Regional W ater Quality Control Board [RWOCB]j daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~a emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered egwpment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not m use. 10) All industrial and commercial faalities shall post signs regwnng that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes).' 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be • required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules inconspicuous areas `l CAF' - l ~l o ' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-78 DRC2005-01124 -CHARLES JOS,~PH ASSOCIATES ~ ~ ' August 9, 2006 • Page 6 ~ ~ • 13) All industrial and commercial site~tgnants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrohnk schedule to the extent reasonably feasible 14) All residential and commercial structures shall~be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and Vvater heaters , 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and, weather-stripping , Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protector preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunityforthe City to establish its archaeological value ~ , • . Consider establishing 'provisions to 'require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their speaal qualities as a theme or focgl point Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse prolect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdelines Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the ' inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the prolect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i a ,paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures• • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing actvities. ~c~ - 1~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-78 DRC2005-01124 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 Page 7 ~ Should fossils be found~within an area being cleared or gradetl, divert • earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the momtor has completed ~ salvage. If construction personnel make the ,discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the momtor of the find Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i e., San Bernardino County Museum) Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-st8bilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance wdh SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-plarited with drought resist2nt landscaping as soon a~ possible ~ ' 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions assoaated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to • , minimize PM,o emissions from the sde during such episodes , 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to , Budding Offiaal for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize sod exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame . DC-,F - 2©~ I,` I ' ' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-78 DRC2005-01124 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES ' August 9, 2006 ~ ' Page 8 ~ ~ ~ 3) Dunng construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or~sediment from the s!te when there !s rainfall or other runoff. 4) Dunng construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed pnor to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in'order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. , 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Associated EnginAers, June 9, 2005, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm dram system to the' maximum extent practical. , 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilisers/pesticides/herbiades! Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval pnor to the issuance of Grading Permits. 7) Ponding areas on the south side of the protect are depressed to promote the , retention and infiltration of treated nunoff and irrigation water • 8) Rooftops drain to landscaping prior to entering storm drain system 9) Collection inlets provided with trash guard/grate. 10) Rinker Stormcepter installed to treat water before entering infiltration area. 11) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to th,e City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the 'maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 12) Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Nose • 1) Exterior An 8-foot high masonry wall shall be constructed along the north property line in order to provide a sound attenuation and privacy between the single-family dwelling units to the north and the protect ~'~ "' ~ l~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-78 , DRC2005-01124 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 Page 9 ~ ~ ~ 2) Interior All south facing windows and glass doors m the hotel bu~lding shall, • have an STC rating of 32 or greafer. 3) A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Piannint Director review and ' approval prior to the issuance of ~Buddmy Permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to~below 40 dBA for the hotel rooms, the bwlding materials and construction techniques regwred The building plans will be checked for confprmance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report 4) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p m. and 6.30 a m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 5) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified m Development Code Section 1,7 02 120-D, as measured at the property Ime. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level morntonng as speaf~ed in Development Code Section 17 02.120. Monitoring at othertimes may be regwred by the Bwldmg Offiaal Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately noUfythe , Bwldmg Offical. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced m intensity to a level of compliance wdh above noise standards or halted. ~ , 6) The perimeter, block wall along the north property Ime shall be constructed as • early as possible ~ 7) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p m. and 6.30 a.m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings r1 ~~~ _2©Z ' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-78 DRC2005-01124 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 Page 10 ~, , 6 ~ The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adopTlon of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF AUGUST 2006 ~ i PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman i ATTEST James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary ' I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of August 2006, by the following vote-to-wit• , AYES' COMMISSIONERS , • NOES. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS • E~ F ZC~ J I~, I , I i i i Rancho Cucamonga Community Development • I ' Building & Safety ~ '' ~~ COMMERCIAUINDUSTRIAL STANDARD CONDITIONS March 30, 2006 ~' Hotel & Commercial Development ~ '~ NEC of Foothill & Rochester , SUBTPM17594 & DRC2005-00365 , ,. ~' NOTE: Any revisions may void these requirements arfd necessitate additional review. o I~ A. New Structures ,,,• 1. Provide compliance with the California Budding Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistive construction. 2 The protect shall be designed to comply with the 2001 California Budding Codes (CBC), the California Fire Code and with RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39 , 3. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations 4. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC Section 1505 , 5. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. 6. Opernngs in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A 7. Provide the requred restroom facilities per the CBC Appendix chapter 29. 8. All exit components must comply with the requrements of CBC Chapter 10 (adioming rooms, rated corridors, door swings, separation of exits, etc.). 9 At the time of tenant improvement plan check submittal (for construction) additional regwrements may be required 10 Clearly indicate on the plans compliance with ADA regwrements for the disabled 11. A registered architect must sign and stamp the plans `~ ~~ ~ 2 ~t--~ ,~ .,, • Page 1 of 3 • B. General Requirements , 1 Submit five conceptual sets of plans including the following a ~ Site/Plot Plan b Floor Plan ~ ' c Foundation Plan ~ , d. Ceding, Floor, and Roof Framing Plan 2 Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number' and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and,single line diagrams. , 3. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, facture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning. 4 Planning Department Tracking Number (SUBTPM17594 and DRC200~-00365) must be clearly noted on the Ttle Sheet of the plans , ' 5. Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls 6 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a sods . report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred prior to plan check • submittal 7 Contractors must show proof of State and City 'licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance 8 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Budding and Safety Department. C. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plaits shall be marked with the protect file number (SUBTPM17594 and DRC2005-00365). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Bwlding and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or maior addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to. City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Pian Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Budding and Safety Department prior to permit issuance. • 3 The Bwlding and Safety Official shall provide the street addresses after tracUparcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits DE~_Zos Page 2 of 3 I 4 Construction activity shall not occur between, the hours of S 00 p m and 6 30 ~.m, Monday through Saturday, wdh no construction on Sunday or holidays, • 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public counter) ~D. Grading ~ ' 1. Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance wnh California Budding Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The firial Grading Plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved Grading Plan. ' 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Geologist and submitted at the time of application for, grading plan check 4 At the time of tenant improvement plan check submittal (for construction) additional regwrements may be required. 5 The final Grading Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be pompleted, submitted, and approved by the Budding and Safety Offiaal prior to the issuance of budding permits 6. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by ,a California registered Civil Engineer Note on title sheet that tenant improvement plans must be submitted for plan check and be approved prior to construction The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact •the Bwlding and Safety Department if you have any questions about the procedure at (909) 477-2710. • E ~- - 2~~ Page 3 of 3 ~;,,u~-~, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection • _ 'District ' ' ~ --~ Fire Construction Services STANDARD ~ONDI'TIONS March 30, 2006 Hotel and Commercial Development NEC of Foothill AND Rochester ' SUBTPM17594 AND DRC2005-00365 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. • The RCFPD Procedures and Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at htto //www ci rancho-cucamonca ca us/fire/intlex.htm_ under the Fire Safety Department and Fire Construction Services section. Search by article; the ' ~ preceding number of the standard refers to the article Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard. ! Hotel construction must comply to all the provision of RCFPD Ordinance 39 for low rise bwldings. , • FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants m commerciaVmdustrial protects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet. b. Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: 1. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways. 2 At intersections. 3 On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As required by the Fire Safety Department to meet operational needs of the Fire Distract. 5 A minimum of 40-feet from any building. c. If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, . additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided d Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of regwred fire flow or fraction thereof 7 E~ - ~~~ '~) } ~, ,~ FSC-2 Fire Flow ~, ,~ , 1. The required minimum fire flow for this proiect,~'whe~ automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 2,250 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of ~0-pounds per square mgfn. This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatip~ fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring. This requirement is made m accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire Distract Ordinances. ~ ~, 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radws of the proposed proiect fray be used to provide the required firs flow subject to Fire ~Distntit review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adiacent property shall not be used to provide regwred fire flow. , 3. Firewater plans are regwred for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 4. On all Site Plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site ,, FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire, sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract Ordinance 15, the 2001~California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards regwre an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance to NFPA 13 to be installed in 1. Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet. 2. Assembly and Educational Occupancy Buildings. 3. All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (see Fire Access). 4. When regwred fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure. 5 When buildings do not meet the requirements of the 2001 California Budding Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard 9-7. 6. When any applicable code or standard requires the structure to be spnnklered. 7 The hotel must be fully spnnklered in accordance to NFPA 13 FSC-5 Fire Alarm System 1 RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or standards) requres an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system. Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Budding Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code. 2 Prior to any removal, remodel, modification and/or additions to the budding or suite's fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a bwlding permit must be obtained Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 '~ ~ ~-Z p • ,, . , • 3. Based on the number of sprinkler heads, the sprinkler system is requred ,to monitored by • a listed central station fire alarm system : FSC-6 Fire District Site Access The hotel„Fire District Access must comply to RCFPD standards for low rise budding in accordance to Ordinance 39 ~ '' Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private ~~ roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Lanes Standard 9'7. ~ '' 1 Location of Access• All portions,pf the structures 1st story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the " exterior of the budding Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates pnd ~~ fences are deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are• ~ , a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. b. The maximum inside turn radws shall be 20-feet. c. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 46-feet. ' d. The minimum radws for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. . e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12 percent. i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). ~. Trees 'and shrubs planted adfacent to the fire, lane shall be kept trimmed' to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3 Access Doorways: Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows a In buddmgs without high-pled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Bwiding Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b In bwldings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided m each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all regwred openings. . 4 Access Walkways. Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all regwred building exterior openings. t~C-F _Zc~ 3 ~~ 5 Commercial/Industrial Gbtes• shall be in accordance with regwrements apply Any gate installed across ~ Fue Department access road Fire Pistnct Standard #9-2 The fo~lowing design a. Prior to the fabrication and ihstallation of the gates, 'plans are required to IDe submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval Upon the completignrof the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. , b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. c Gates may be matonzed or manual. ' d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of''dnve access shall be 2,0 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the,, Fire Safety ' Office for $20 00. f. Motorized gatgs must open at the rate of one-foot per second , g. The motgnzed gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and afail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of powerfailure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motorized~gates shall be egwpped with a Kr1ox tivernde key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. i For motorized gates, a traffic loop dewce must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. ~ If traffic pre-emption dewces (TPD) are to ¢e installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief poor to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 6. Fire Lane Identification. Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A Site Plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire Distract standards shall be included in the„architectural plans submitted to Bands for approval. 7. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the Site Plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to Bands for plan rewew. 8. Roof Access: There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75 feet above the level of the fire access road. a This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder. b A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in bwldings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the bwlding size and configuration d Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard • :' • f q. ~, , ,~ f f ~ 1' , e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, • a permanently mounted access ladder is required. ~ f. Multiple access ladders may bL regwred for larger buildings. ' g. Ladder construction must be m accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Staridard ' g-g Appendix A and drawings 9-9a and 9-9b. h. A Site Plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submittetl during plan ' check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly assoaated with the business operations arid/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval •, of the permit; field inspection is regwred prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not speafically described below, which in the iudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that mays be hazardous to life or property. Battery Systems ~ + • Candles and open flames in public assemblies ' , Compressed Gases ~' . • Public Assembly ' Cryogenics Dry Cleaning Plants Refrigeration Systems Repair Garages Flammable and Combustible Ligwds Spraying or Dipping Operations Hazardous Materials Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures Liquefied Petroleum Gases LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Bwldmgs FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business • Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards. Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance. The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucam;~onga ~7 ~J /~ T ~' r [i` 1 5 1 If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Bwldmg and Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department; reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. California Government Code, Section•65t3502 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of, Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure regwrements. A Ri§k Management Program (RMP) may also be regwred if regulation substances are tb be used or stored at the new facility. ~ • , 2. Any business that operates on rented' or leased arooerty which is required to submit a . ~ plan, d is also regwred to submit a notice to the owner, of the property in writing stating that the business is subject, to the Business Emergency/,Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five working days, if requested by the owner. FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of bwldings and/or the installation of egwpment designed to store, use or dispense Iazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Bwldmg, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire Distract 'Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department, Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this protect. The project appears to be' located on a property that is being subdivided. The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the Site Plan The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office. Reciprocal access agreement -Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and anon-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire Distract to gam access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire Distract. Reciprocal water covenant -Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities m general) The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire Distract Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1 Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review ~ c--~r 6 ~ Z • C~ ''t and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fue Distract Standards Approval of the on-site (pfivate) fire underground and water plans is required • prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private ron.site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4. The Building and Safety Department and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspectigns. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor,to delivering any combustible framing materials to th"e site. Fire construction Services wall inspect the Installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber Is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicdnt shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distract and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a'600-foot radds of the protect Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard 9-8. All requred public fire hydrants shall be insfalled, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Sennces shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3 Construction,Access: The access roads must tie paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over atx:ess roads must be installed at least 14 feet 6"above the finished surface of the road. 4 Fire Flow• A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant Is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. ~ - ' 5 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. , PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures°. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: ` 1. Hydrant Markers. All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants. For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code Fire Sprinkler System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services p ~F - ~i '~ r~' I i ~ 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring' Pnor to the issuance of a Certficate of; Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Constr coon Services The fire sprinkler morntoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately • following the completion of the fire spfinkier system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other speaal hazard protection systems shall ,be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services befote occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to, the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm ' system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Constructon Servces. ' 7. Access Control Gates Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular ' gates must be inspected, tested and accepted ir) accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services. S. 'Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Constructon Services. + The CC&R's, ~ the reciprocal agreement andl/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, speafy the method of enforcer(i~ent and identifies who is responsible for the required annualiinspections and the maintenancQ of afl regwred fire access roadways. 9. Address: Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commeraaVindustrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness. When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non- illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance. Larger address numbers will be required on buildings Ibcated on wide streets or built with large setbacks inmulti-tenant commeraal and industrial buildings. The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all swtes. 10. Hazardous Materials. Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Department The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services 11. Confidential Business Occupancy Information• The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire Distract use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 12. Mapping Site Plan Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 1/2 inch by 11 inches or 11 inch by 17 inches Site Plan of the site in accordance with' RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as requred in the standard The Site Plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. ~ ~,~ ~ Z~ ~ ' 4~ • T H E C I T Y O F R A N C fi O C U C A M O N G A „ Staff Report DATE August 9, 2006 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Plamm~g Director gY Dan Coleman, Pnnapal Planner SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2006-00576 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to Section 17 02 110 -Public Hearings and Notification requirements This action is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines This action will be forwarded to the City Counctl for final action " • BACKGROUND On July 5, 2006, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga declared their intent to amend the public hearing and notification requirements to increase the number of property owners receiving public hearing notices and to increase the amount of time between the marling of the public hearing notice and when the hearing is conducted - ANALYSIS A Noticin The City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes the importance of public participation at every level of the planning process Therefore, the City goes beyond the minimum requrements of state law for notification There are three notification methods for public hearing items 1 Mailing -State law requues that notices be mailed or delivered at least 10 days prior to hearing to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of a proposed protect The City typically exceeds this by using an expanded radius as determined on a case-by-case bases for infill protects, General Plan Amendments, and protects with EIRs Proposed Amendment Increase the notification radius to 660 feet per the dlrechon of the Clty Counal Effectively, this wdl triple the number of property owners who wdl receive nonce (Exhibit A) if the Plamm~g Department deems that an expanded radius Is warranted for Infdl projects, the expanded radius wdl be determined by the Clty Counal as an Item on a Clty Counal agenda 2 Publication -State law requires notice to be published in a local newspaper at least 10 days prior to the hearing or posted in at least three public places For public hearing items involving environmental review, State law requires notice to be published in a local • newspaper at least 20 days prior to hearing In both cases, the City typically publishes the "legal ad" notice 30 days prior to the hearing date Proposed Amendment Increase the notification period from 10 days to 15 days ITEM G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2006-00576 PUBLIC HEARING AND NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS August 9, 2006 Page 2 Large Notification Sign -City law requires that large, 4-foot by 8-foot NOTICE OF FILING signs be posted on the protect site for infdl protects with higher intensity land use than the surrounding neighborhood, protects requinng a General Plan Amendment, protects requiring an Environmental Impact Report, for other protects `as deemed necessary by the Planning Director These large NOTICE OF FILING signs provide notice to residents who may rent property in the protect area, new residents who may not be listed yet as property owners, and to people who do not live within the 660 foot radius and those who travel by the protect site Proposed Amendment Require NOTICE OF FILING signs to be posted every 300 lineal feet of project street frontage Regardless of whether a protect requires a public hearing, the City also encourages public participation through neighborhood meetings For infill protects that adjoin residences, City policy is to ask the protect applicant to conduct a neighborhood meeting to solicit public input early in the process The applicant is responsible for conducting a neighborhood meeting to explain the protect, present drawings, and obtain input from surrounding residents The neighborhood meeting should be held Dr10r to the Design Review and Technical Review Committees The project applicant will mail a wntten invitation, at a minimum, to all property owners within a 660-foot radus After the meeting, the protect applicant is responsible to prepare a written report detailing how they will address public concerns B Environmental Assessment The Planning Department Staff has determined that the protect is statutorily exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Qualdy Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Gudelines The protect qualifies under Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines because it can be seen with certainty that this text amendment that will not cause a significant effect on the environment CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Dady Bulletin newspaper RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council through adoption of the attached Resolution Respectfully submitted, ~~/~ R. ~~ " 0 (~ James R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT DC Is Attachments Exhibit A -Notification Radius Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Code Amendment DRC2006-00576 • r1 LJ C 1 G-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2006-00576 PUBLIC HEARING AND NOTIFICATION REQUfREMENTS . August 9, 2006 Page 3 Each square represents a property 100 feet x 100 feet N = Project site = 45 properties noticed within 300 foot radius ®= 145 properties noticed within 600 foot radius G-~ EXHIBIT A • RESOLUTION NO 06-79 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2006-00576, AMENDING SECTION 17 02 110 - PUBLIC HEARINGS AND NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A Recitals 1 The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development Code Amendment DRC2006-00576, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 9th day of August 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said heanng on that date All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- ' referenced public hearing on August 9, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located within the City, and b The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the distract, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, and b This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code, and c The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenaliy in~unous to properties or improvements in the vicinity, and • d The subtect application is consistent with the obtectives of the Development Code, and G-4 II PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-79 DCA2006-00576 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Page 2 , The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan 4 ~ The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is statutonly exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the' City's CEQA Gwdehnes The project qualifies under Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Gwdehnes because it can be seen with certainty that this text amendment that will not cause a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission has reviewed the'Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent tudgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby forwards to the City Council a recommendation to approve Development Code Amendment No DRC2006-00576 by the adoption of the attached City Council Ordinance 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the,adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF AUGUST 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C(JCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of August 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • i G-5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2006-00576 PUBLIC HEARING AND NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS • August 9, 2006 Page 3 EXHIBIT A Each square represents a property 100 feet x 100 feet = Project site = 45 properties noticed within 300 foot radius ®= 145 properties noticed within 600 foot radius G-6 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-76 SUBTPM17594 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 Page 4 Enpineerinq Department 1) Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Maior Divided Arterial" standards as required and including a) Provide or protect curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, street trees, drive approaches, signing, and striping b) Reconstruct curb return/curb and gutter and relocate traffic signal equipment at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue c) Provide or protect R26(s) "No Stopping" signs along the Foothill Boulevard frontage d) No new median openings are allowed in the Foothill Boulevard median without a traffic signal e) Protect or replace traffic signal equipment f) Provide deceleration/nght-turn lanes for €eet#+II-Boulevard the easterly and westerly driveways as-;~~ The middle driveway does not require one g) Any driveway with a median shall have two 20-foot wide drive aisles separated by a 10-foot wide median The median shall not extend into the public nght-of-way h) Signalized driveway must align with proposed driveway on the south side of Foothill Boulevard The Foothill Boulevard frontage shall be designed in accordance with the City adopted Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan including street lights, traffic signal, activity centers, street pavers Route 66 and median ~) Obtain additional streeUsidewalk easements from Southern California Edison and San Bernardino County Flood Control District in contunction with the proposed easterly right-turn lane If the easterly nght turn lane can be designed such that the existing right of way provides for curb adjacent sidewalk to the satisfaction of the City Engineer then additional easement is not required. k) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check from Rochester Avenue to Day Creek Channel Bridge ~E,F PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-76 SUBTPM17594 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 Page 5 For that portion of the pavement overlay easterly of the project's east property Ime and for the reconstruction for the median left turn pocket at Rochester, this work is eligible for transportation fee creditor reimbursement 2) Rochester Avenue frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Mator Stvided Arterial" standards as required and including a) Provide or protect curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, street trees, drive approach, traffic signs, and striping, as required b) Provide a combined northbound busbay/right-turn lane on Rochester Avenue for driveway c) Provide or protect R26(s) "No Stopping" signs along Rochester Avenue frontage d) Ttie o....ti,.~•,., n,,.... .. a.., ~ ~.. tie ...tir • ..a ,,, ~ enty Restnpe Rochester Avenue as requred to provide turning movements e) TMe Any driveway with a median shall have two 20-foot drive aisles separated by a 10-foot wide median The median shall not extend into the public right-of-way f) Protect or replace traffic signal equipment 3) The following are required on-site a) Provide 80 feet of stacking at the signalized driveway b) Provide an easement for the maintenance of traffic signal c) Provide clear lanes for north and south traffic at the signalized drive aisle d) Provide a sign as-sk~ewn-abeve that reads "Wait Here For Signal" at signalized drive aisle e) Provide "Keep Clear" pavement legend 4) Reconstruct Fennel Road to a reduced radius turn-around per City Standard 113, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 5) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 Kv electrical) on the protect side of RochesterAvenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole off-site north of the protect boundary to the first pole offsite south of Foothill Boulevard, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-77 DRC2005-00365 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 Page 5 8) All conditions from Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17594 shall apply 9) Reaprocal maintenance agreement ensuring ioint maintenance of all landscape areas, common areas, drives, parking areas shall be recorded prior, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 10) Should all buildings not be constructed concurrently, all remaining building pads shall include hydro-seed, interior landscaping and perimeter landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director The plans submitted for plan check shall include landscape and irrigation plans indicating a plant palette and irrigation design for all future building pads The final design of the landscaping for any future building pads shall be subtect to Planning Director review and approval during plan check 11) All perimeter landscaping along all street frontages and future building pad landscaping shall be completed prior occupancy being granted Enpineering Department 1) Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Maior Divided Arterial" stand8rds as required and including a) Provide or protect curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, street trees, drive approaches, signing and striping b) Reconstruct curb return/curb and gutter and relocate traffic signal equipment at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue c) Provide or protect R26(s) "No Stopping" signs along Foothill Boulevard frontage d) No new median openings in Foothill Boulevard median without a Traffic Signal e) Protect or replace traffic signal equipment f) Provide deceleration/right turn lanes for €eet+~-Bealevard the easterly and westerly driveways The middle driveway does not require one. g) the Any driveway with a median shall have two 20-foot wide drive aisles separated by a 10-foot wide median The median shall not extend into the public right-of-way h) Signalized driveway must align with proposed driveway on the south side of Foothill Boulevard The Foothill Boulevard frontage shall be designed in accordance with the City adopted Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan ,r.~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-77 DRC2005-00365 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 Page 6 including street lights, traffic signal, activity centers, street pavers Route 66 and median ~) Obtain additional street/sidewalk easements from Southern California Edison and San Bernardino County Flood Control District m coniunction with the proposed easterly right turn lane If the easterly right turn lane can be designed such that the existing right of way provides for curb adjacent sidewalk to the satisfaction of the City Engineer then additional easement is not required. k) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check from Rochester Avenue to Day Creek Channel Bridge For that portion of pavement overlay easterly of the project's east property Ime and for the reconstruction of the median left turn pocket at Rochester, this work is eligible for transportation fee credit or reimbursement. 2) Rochester Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Mator t3wided Arterial" standards as required and including a) Provide or protect curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, street trees, drive approach, traffic signs and striping, as required b) Provide a combined northbound busbay/right turn lane on Rochester Avenue for driveway c) Provide or protect R26(s) "No Stopping" signs along Rochester Avenue frontage d) Restripe Rochester Avenue as required to provide turning movements e) The Any driveway with a median shall have two 20-foot drive aisles separated by a 10-foot wide median The median shall not extend into the public right-of-way f) Protect or replace traffic signal equipment 3) The following are required on-site a) Provide 80 feet of stacking at the signalized driveway b) Provide an easement for the maintenance of traffic signal c) Provide clear lanes for north and south traffic at the signalized drive aisle PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-77 DRC2005-00365 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 9, 2006 Page 7 d) Provide a sign as--shewn-above that reads "Wait Here For Signal" at signalized drive aisle e) Provide a "Keep Clear" pavement legend 4) Reconstruct Fennel Road to a reduced radius turn around per City Standard 113, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 5) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 KV electrical) on the project side of Rochester Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole offsite the north project boundary to the first pole offsite south of Foothill Boulevard, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street If the developer fads to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate 6) The developer shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Municpal Utility regwrements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility The Rancho Municipal Utility shall be the electrical service provider for all project related development 7) This development shall pay the City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency for Parcel APN 0227-152-31 of $150,734 78 and for Parcel APN 0227-152-18 of $302,590 26 as part of the 2003-01 CFD improvements The said amounts will increase after September 1 of 2006 as determined by the Redevelopment Agency 8) An in-lieu fee for one-fourth the cost of constructing special pavers within the Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue intersection shall be paid to the City priorto final map recordation The fee amount shall be based on the square footage of the intersection 9) Foothill Boulevard Median Island including landscaping and irrigation shall be reconstructed in conjunction with the signalized driveway at the easterly project boundary Revise existing Landscape Maintenance District plans accordingly to reflect the above improvements a) This project will disrupt an existing City-maintained landscape and irrigation area Prior to new construction, a toint inspection and documentation of the existing area's condition shall occur with both the new contractor and the City inspector The existing irrigation system shall be relocated as needed and any damaged landscaping replaced to the satisfaction of the City Engineer At Planning Commission Meeting of ~ ! 6 ~O RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN-UP SHEET Please print your name, address, and city and indicate the item you have spoken regarding Thank you NAME ADDRESS CITY ITEM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Sc Pit r 5 Fu'ynU~ R , `'~ u~ C~fc~ ~ fT.~,~'~,~^i4 / % /~ s'Fw d/~~~ CfJ u ~5C I~L~ 81 ~c,P'Hru. ,l" 2. c ~ 9i ~.~v ~ -~ ck~